SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 20-F

(Mark One)

¨    REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
OR
þ    ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
    For the fiscal year ended 31 March 20152016
OR
¨    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
OR
¨    SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
    Date of event requiring this shell company report                    
    For the transition period from                to                

Commission file number: 001-14958

NATIONAL GRID PLC

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

England and Wales

(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

1-3 Strand, London WC2N 5EH, England

(Address of principal executive offices)

Alison Kay

011 44 20 7004 3000

Facsimile No. 011 44 20 7004 3004

Group General Counsel and Company Secretary

National Grid plc

1-3 Strand London WC2N 5EH, England

(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934:

 

Title of each class

 

Name of each exchange on which registered

Ordinary Shares of 11 17/43 pence each The New York Stock Exchange*
American Depositary Shares, each representing five The New York Stock Exchange
Ordinary Shares of 11 17/43 pence each 
6.625% Guaranteed Notes due 2018 The New York Stock Exchange
6.30% Guaranteed Notes due 2016 The New York Stock Exchange
Preferred Stock ($100 par value-cumulative): 
3.90% Series The New York Stock Exchange
3.60% Series The New York Stock Exchange

 

 

 *Not for trading, but only in connection with the registration of American Depositary Shares representing Ordinary Shares pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: None.

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: None.

The number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of 31 March 20152016 was

Ordinary Shares of 11 17/43 pence each 3,891,691,9003,924,038,086

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act: Yes þ  No ¨

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  Yes ¨  No þ

Note — Checking the box above will not relieve any registrant required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 from their obligations under those Sections.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days:  Yes þ  No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files):  Yes ¨  No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer” and “large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer þ  Accelerated filer ¨  Non-accelerated filer ¨

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

U.S. GAAP ¨    International Financial  Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board þ     Other ¨

If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.  Item 17 ¨    Item 18 ¨

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes ¨  No þ

This constitutes the annual report on Form 20-F of National Grid plc (the “Company”) in accordance with the requirements of the US Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) for the year ended 31 March 20152016 and is dated 57 June 2015.2016. Details of events occurring subsequent to the approval of the annual report on 2018 May 20152016 are summarised in section “Further Information” which forms a part of this Form 20-F .20-F. The content of the Group’s website (www.nationalgrid.com/uk) should not be considered to form part of this annual report on Form 20-F.

 

 

 


Form 20-F Cross Reference Table

 

Item

  Form 20-F caption  Location in the document     Page(s)    Form 20-F caption  Location in the document     Page(s)  

1

  

 

Identity of directors, senior management and advisors

  

 

Not applicable

   –        

 

Identity of directors, senior management and advisors

  

 

Not applicable

   –      

2

  

 

Offer statistics and expected timetable

  

 

Not applicable

   –        

 

Offer statistics and expected timetable

  

 

Not applicable

   –      

3

  

 

Key Information

      

 

Key Information

    
  

3A Selected financial data

  

“Additional Information—Summary consolidated financial information”

   200-201  
  

3A Selected financial data

  

“Additional Information—Summary consolidated financial information”

   190-191      

“Strategic Report—Financial review”

   22-25  
    

“Strategic Report��Financial review”

   20-23      

“Financial Statements—Consolidated statement of financial position”

   98  
    

“Financial Statements—Unaudited commentary on consolidated statement of financial position—Net debt”

   91      

“Financial Statements—Unaudited commentary on consolidated statement of financial position—Net debt”

   99  
    

“Financial Statements—Unaudited commentary on the consolidated cash flow statement—Net debt”

   93      

“Financial Statements—Unaudited commentary on the consolidated cash flow statement—Net debt”

   101  
    

“Additional Information—Other unaudited financial information—Reconciliations of adjusted profit measures”

   186      

“Additional Information—Other unaudited financial information—Reconciliations of adjusted profit measures”

   196  
    

“Additional Information—Shareholder information—Exchange rates”

   180      

“Additional Information—Shareholder information—Exchange rates”

   189  
    

“Exchange Rates”

   

 

“Further

Information”

 

  

    

“Exchange Rates”

   
 
“Further
Information”
  
  
  

3B Capitalization and indebtedness

  

Not applicable

   –        

3B Capitalization and indebtedness

  

Not applicable

   –      
  

3C Reasons for the offer and use of proceeds

  

Not applicable

   –        

3C Reasons for the offer and use of proceeds

  

Not applicable

   –      
  

3D Risk Factors

  

“Additional Information—The business in detail—Risk factors”

   173-176    

3D Risk Factors

  

“Additional Information—The business in detail—Risk factors”

   183-186  

4

  

Information on the company

      

Information on the company

    
  

4A History and development of the company

  

“Want more information or help?”

   

 

196-

Back cover

  

  

  

4A History and development of the company

  

“Want more information or help?”

   

 

207

Back cover

  

  

    

“Additional Information—The business in detail—Key milestones”

   164      

“Additional Information—The business in detail—Key milestones”

   174  
    

“Strategic Report—Chief Executive’s review”

   4-5      

“Strategic Report—Chief Executive’s review”

   6-7  
    

“Strategic Report—Our vision and strategy”

   14-15      

“Strategic Report—Operating environment”

   8-9  
    

“Strategic Report—Operating environment”

   6-7      

“Additional Information—Shareholder information—Articles of Association”

   187-188  
    

“Additional Information—Shareholder information—Articles of Association”

   177-178      

“Financial Statements—Consolidated statement of financial position—Unaudited commentary on consolidated statement of financial position—Property, plant and equipment”

   99  
    

“Financial Statements—Consolidated statement of financial position—Unaudited commentary on consolidated statement of financial position—Property, plant and equipment”

   91      

“Financial Statements—Consolidated cash flow statement—Unaudited commentary on the consolidated cash flow statement—Net capital expenditure”

   101  
    

“Financial Statements—Consolidated cash flow statement—Unaudited commentary on the consolidated cash flow statement—Net capital expenditure”

   93      

“Additional Information—Other unaudited financial information—Commentary on consolidated financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2015”

   197-199  
    

“Additional Information—Other unaudited financial information—Commentary on consolidated financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2014”

   187-189      

“Financial Statements—Notes to the consolidated financial statements—2. Segmental analysis—(c) Capital expenditure

   106  
    

“Financial Statements—Notes to the consolidated financial statements—2. Segmental analysis—(c) Capital expenditure, depreciation and amortisation”

   98      

“Additional Information—The business in detail—UK Regulation”; “US Regulation” and “—Summary of US price controls and rate plans”

   176-182  
    

“Strategic Report—How our strategy creates value”

   15    

4B Business overview

  

“Additional Information—The business in detail—Where we operate”

   175  
  

4B Business overview

  

“Additional Information—The business in detail—Where we operate”

   165      

“Strategic Report—Operating environment”

   8-9  
    

“Strategic Report—Operating environment”

   6-7      

“Strategic Report“—What we do – Electricity”;

“—What we do – Gas”;

“—Our Business model”;

   

 

 

10-11

12-13

14-15

  

  

  

    

“Strategic Report”—What we do – Electricity”;

   8-9  

 

i


Item

  Form 20-F caption  Location in the document   Page(s)    
    

“—What we do – Gas”;

“—Our Business model”;

“—Our vision and strategy”

and“—Our KPIs”

   

 

10-1116-17

12-13

14-1918-21

  

  

“—How our strategy creates value”

15
    

“Strategic Report—Principal operations”

   27-36

“Strategic Report—Delivering our strategy – key performance indicators”

16-1931-43  
    

“Financial Statements—Notes to the consolidated financial statements—2. Segmental analysis” and “—unaudited commentary on the results of our principal operations by segment”

   96-100104-108  

“Additional Information—Internal control and risk factors—Risk factors—Infrastructure and IT systems—We may suffer a major network failure or interruption, or may not be able to carry out critical operations due to the failure of infrastructure, data, technology or a lack of supply”; “—Law and Regulation—Changes in law or regulation or decisions by governmental bodies or regulators could materially adversely affect us”; and “—Customers and counterparties—Customers and counterparties may not perform their obligations”


174

174

176


    

“Additional Information—The business in detail—UK regulation”Regulation”; “—US regulation”Regulation”; and “—Summary of US price controls and rate plans”

   166-172176-182  
    

“Strategic Report—Our Business model”

   12-1314-15  
  

4C Organizational structure

  

“Financial Statements—Notes to the consolidated financial statements—32. Subsidiary undertakings, joint ventures and associates—Principal subsidiary undertakings”

   150157-159  
  

4D Property, plants and equipment

  

“Additional Information—The business in detail—Where we operate” and

— “Property, plant and equipment

   

 

165175

185194

  

  

    

“Strategic Report—What we do – Electricity”; “—What we do – Gas”; and

8-11

“—Our Business model”;

   

12-13
10-13

“Strategic Report—Principal operations”14-15

  27-36

    

“Strategic Report—Our vision and strategy—Embed sustainability” and “—Drive growth”

   1417  
    

“Strategic Report—Operating environment—Changing energy mix”The cost of supply”; “—Energy policy”; “—Regulation” Security of supply”; and “—Innovation and technology”Sustainability”

   6-78-9  
    

“Financial Statements—Consolidated statement of financial position—Unaudited commentary on consolidated statement of financial position—Property, plant and equipment”

   9199  
    

“Additional Information—Other disclosures—Property, plant and equipment”

   185199  
    

“Financial Statements—Notes to the consolidated financial statements—11.

115-116

ii


Item

Form 20-F captionLocation in the documentPage(s)  

Property, plant and equipment”

  122-123
    

“Financial Statements—Notes to the consolidated financial statements—19. Borrowings”

   123-125130-131

“Additional Information—The business in detail—Where we operate”

175  

4A

  

Unresolved staff comments

  

“Additional Information—Other disclosures—Unresolved SEC staff comments”

   185195  

5

  

Operating and financial review and prospects

    
  

5A Operating results

  

“Strategic Report—Financial review”

   20-2322-25  
    

“Strategic Report—Operating environment”

   6-78-9  
    

“Additional Information—The business in detail—UK regulation”; “—US regulation”; and “—Summary of US price controls and rate plans”

   166-172176-182  
    

“Strategic Report—Principal operations”

   27-3631-43  
    

“Financial Statements—Consolidated income statement—Unaudited commentary on the consolidated income statement”

   8795
“Financial Statements—Notes to the107

ii


ItemForm 20-F captionLocation in the documentPage(s)    
    

“Financial Statements—Notes to the consolidated financial statements—2. Segmental analysis—Unaudited commentary on the results of our principal operations by segment”

  99
    

“Additional Information—Other unaudited financial information”

   186-189196-198

“Strategic Report—Our KPIs”

18

“Strategic Report—Strategic Objective: Drive Growth—Sustained inflation/deflation in the UK/US”

27  
    

“Financial Statements—Notes to the consolidated financial statements—30. Financial risk management—(d) Currency risk”

   144-145152

“Additional Information—Internal control and risk factors—Law and regulation”

184  
  

5B Liquidity and capital resources

  

“Strategic Report—Financial review”

   20-2322-25  
    

Corporate Governance—Financial Statements—Notes to the consolidated financial statements—1 A Going concern”

   54102  
    

“Financial Statements—Consolidated cash flow statement”

   92-93100-101  
    

“Additional Information—Internal control and risk factors—Risk factors—Financing and liquidity—An inability to access capital markets at commercially acceptable interest rates could affect how we maintain and grow our businesses”

   176186  
    

“Financial Statements—Notes to the consolidated financial statements—2. Segmental analysis—Unaudited commentary on the results of our principal operations by segment”

   99107  
    

“Financial Statements—Notes to the consolidated financial statements—26. Net debt”

   134-135142-143

“Financial Statements—Notes to the consolidated financial statements—27. Commitments and contingencies”

144  
    

“Financial Statements—Notes to the consolidated financial statements—19. Borrowings”

   123-125130-131  
    

“Financial Statements—Notes to the consolidated financial statements—15. Derivative financial instruments”

   118-120126-128  
    

Additional Information—The business in detail—FERC—Short-term borrowing authorisation”Financial Statements—Notes to the consolidated financial statements—30. Financial risk management—(b) Liquidity risk”

   171151  
    

Additional Information—Shareholder information—Material interests in shares”Financial Statements—Notes to the consolidated financial statements—31. Borrowing facilities”

   180-181156  
    

“Material Interests in Shares” and “Material interest in American Depositary Shares”

   “Further Information”

5C Research and development, patents and licenses, etc.

“Additional Information—Other disclosures—Research and development”

194-195

5D Trend information

“Strategic Report—Financial review”

22-25

“Strategic Report—Principal operations”

31-43

“Strategic Report—Operating environment”

8-10

5E Off-balance sheet arrangements

“Financial Statements—Unaudited commentary on consolidated statement of financial condition—Off balance sheet items”

99

5F Tabular disclosure of contractual obligations

“Financial Statements—Notes to the consolidated financial statements—27.

144  

 

iii


Item

  Form 20-F caption  Location in the document   Page(s)    
    

interest in American Depositary Shares”

5C Research and development, patents and licenses, etc.

“Additional Information—Other disclosures—Research and development”

185

5D Trend information

“Strategic Report—Financial review”

20-23

“Strategic Report—Principal operations”

27-36

“Strategic Report—Operating environment”

6-7

5E Off-balance sheet arrangements

“Financial Statements—Unaudited commentary on consolidated statement of financial condition—Off balance sheet items”

91

5F Tabular disclosure of contractual obligations

“Financial Statements—Notes to the consolidated financial statements—27. Commitments and contingencies”

  136
  

5G Safe Harbor

  

“Important notice”

   1  
    

“Want more information or help?—Cautionary statement”

   
208/Back
cover

  

6

  

Directors, senior management and employees

        
  

6A Directors and senior management

  

“Corporate Governance—Our Board”

   43

“Additional Information—Shareholder Information—Board biographies”

178-17947-48  
  

6B Compensation

  

“Corporate Governance—Directors’ Remuneration Report”

   60-7568-81  
    

“Financial Statements—Notes to the consolidated financial statements—3. Operating costs—(c) Key management compensation”

   102110  
    

“Financial Statements—Notes to the consolidated financial statements—22. Pensions and other post-retirement benefits”

   126-129132-137  
    

“Financial Statements—Notes to the consolidated financial statements—29. Actuarial information on pensions and other post-retirement benefits”

   137-140

“Share Ownership”

“Further Information”145-148  
  

6C Board practices

  

“Corporate Governance—Our Board”

   43-49

“Additional Information—Shareholder information”

177-17947-48  
    

“Additional Information—Other disclosures” “—Conflict of interest”; and —Director’s indemnity”

   184-185193-194  
    

“Corporate Governance—“Board Composition, Our Board and its committees—committees and Board and committee interactions”; “—Audit Committee”; “—Finance Committee”; “—Safety, Environment and Health Committee”; “—Nominations Committee”; “—Executive Committee”; “—Management committees” and “—Statement of compliance with the UK Corporate Governance Code”

   49-5949-66  
    

“Corporate Governance—Directors’ Remuneration Report—Annual statement from the Remuneration Committee chairman”

   60-6168-69  
    

“Corporate Governance—Directors’ Remuneration Report—Approved policy table – Executive Directors”

   62-6571-73  
    

“Corporate Governance— Directors’ Remuneration Report—Approved policy table – Non-executive Directors (NEDs)”

   6573  
    

“Corporate Governance—Directors’ Remuneration Report—Service contractsPolicy on payment for loss of office” and “—Policy on Recruitment remuneration”

   6774

6D Employees

“Financial Statements—Notes to the consolidated financial statements—3. Operating costs—(b) Number of employees”

109

“Additional Information—Other disclosures—Employees”

194

6E Share ownership

“Corporate Governance— Directors’ Remuneration Report—Statement of Directors’ shareholdings and share interests (audited information)”

79

“Corporate Governance— Directors’ Remuneration Report—Annual report on remuneration”

75-81

”Additional Information—Other disclosures—All-employee share plans”

193  

 

iv


Item

  Form 20-F caption  Location in the document  Page(s)    

and policy on payment for loss of office” and “—Dates of Directors’ service contracts/letters of appointment”

6D Employees

“Financial Statements—Notes to the consolidated financial statements—3. Operating costs—(b) Number of employees”

   101

“Additional Information—Other disclosures—Employees”

185

6E Share ownership

“Corporate Governance—Directors’ Remuneration Report—Shareholding requirement” and “—Differences in remuneration policy for all employees”

66

“Corporate Governance—Directors’ Remuneration Report—Statement of Directors’ shareholdings and share interests (audited information)”

72-73

“Corporate Governance—Directors’ Remuneration Report—Annual report on remuneration”

69-75

“Additional Information—Other disclosures—All-employee share plans”

184
  

“Share ownership”

  “Further Information”  

7

  

 

Major shareholders and related party transactions

       
  

7A Major shareholders

  

“Additional Information—Shareholder information—Material interests in shares”

  180-181189  
    

“Material interests in shares” and “Material interest in American Depositary Shares”

  “Further Information”  
  

7B Related party transactions

  

“Financial Statements—Notes to the consolidated financial statements—28. Related party transactions”

  

137145

Further Information


“Financial Statements—Notes to the consolidated financial statements—27 Commitment and Contingencies.

144  
  

7C Interests of experts and counsel

  

Not applicable

  –      

8

  

 

Financial information

       
  

8A Consolidated statements and other financial information

   
    

“Financial Statements—Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm—Audit opinion for Form 20-F”

  8593  
    

“Financial Statements—Notes to the consolidated financial statements—1. Basis of preparation and recent accounting developments”

  94-96102-104  
    

“Financial Statements—Consolidated income statement”; “—Consolidated statement of comprehensive income”; “—Consolidated statement of changes in equity”; “—Consolidated statement of financial position”; and “—Consolidated cash flow statement”

  86-9394-100  
    

“Financial Statements—Notes to the consolidated financial statements – analysis of items in the primary statements”

  94-135102-143  
    

“Financial Statements—Notes to the consolidated financial statements – supplementary information”

  136-158144-167  
    

“Strategic Report—Chairman’s statement”

  2-34-5  
   

8B Significant changes

  

“Subsequent Events”

  “Further Information”  

v


Item

Form 20-F captionLocation in the documentPage(s)  

9

  

The offer and listing

   
  

9A Offer and listing details

  

“Additional Information—Shareholder information—“Exchange Rates”, “—Share price”, “— Price History”

  

 

180-182189-190

“Further Information”

  

  

  

9B Plan of distribution

  

Not applicable

 
  

9C Markets

  

“Additional Information—Shareholder information—Share price”

  181-182190  
  

9D Selling shareholders

  

Not applicable

  –      
  

9E Dilution

  

Not applicable

  –      
   

9F Expenses of the issue

  

Not applicable

  –      

10

  

 

Additional information

   
  

10A Share capital

  

Not applicable

  –      
  

10B Memorandum and articles of association

  

“Additional Information—Shareholder Information—Articles of Association”

  177-178187-188  
    

“Additional Information—

Other disclosures—Corporate governance practices: differences from New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) listing standards”

  184193  
    

“Additional Information—Shareholder information—Share capital”

  181189-190  

v


Item

  Form 20-F caption  Location in the document   Page(s)    
  

10C Material contracts

  

“Additional Information—Other disclosures—Material contracts”

   194  
  

10D Exchange controls

  

“Additional Information—Shareholder information—Exchange controls”

   188  
  

10E Taxation

  

“Additional Information——Shareholder information—Taxation”

   190-192  
  

10F Dividends and paying agents

  

Not applicable

   –      
  

10G Statement by experts

  

Not applicable

   –      
  

10H Documents on display

  

“Additional Information—Shareholder information—Documents on display”

   188  
   

10I Subsidiary information

  

Not applicable

   –      

11

  

 

Quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk

    
  

11A Quantitative information about market risk

  

“Financial Statements—Notes to the consolidated financial statements—15. Derivative financial instruments”

   126-128  
    

“Financial Statements—Notes to the consolidated financial statements—3. Sensitivities on areas of estimation and uncertainty”

   160-161  
    

“Financial Statements—Notes to the consolidated financial statements—30. Financial risk management—(a) Credit risk”; “—(b) Liquidity risk”; “—(c) Interest rate risk”; “—(d) Currency risk”; “—(e) Commodity risk”; “—(f) Capital risk management”; and “—(g) Fair value analysis”

   149-155  
    

“Strategic Report—Financial review”

   22-25  
  

11B Qualitative information about market risk

  

“Financial Statements—Notes to the consolidated financial statements—15. Derivative financial instruments”

   126-128  
    

“Financial Statements—Notes to the consolidated financial statements—30. Financial risk management—(a) Credit risk”; “—(b) Liquidity risk”; “—(c) Interest rate risk”; “—(d) Currency risk”; “—(e) Commodity risk”; “—(f) Capital risk management”; and “—(g) Fair value analysis”

   149-155  
    

“Strategic Report—Financial review”

   22-25  
      

“Additional Information—Internal Control and Risk factors“—Risk Factors ”

   183-186  

12

  

 

Description of securities other than equity securities

    
  

12A Debt securities

  

Not applicable

   –      
  

12B Warrants and rights

  

Not applicable

   –      
  

12C Other securities

  

Not applicable

   –      
  

12D American depositary shares

  

“Additional Information—Shareholder information—Description of securities other than equity securities: depositary fees and charges”

   188  
    

“Additional Information—Shareholder information—Depositary payments to the Company”

   188  
      

“Additional Information—Definitions and glossary of terms”

   203-206  

13

  

 

Defaults, dividend arrearages and delinquencies

  

Not applicable

   –      

14

  

 

Material modifications to the rights of security holders and use of proceeds

  

Not applicable

   –      

15

  

 

Controls and procedures

  

“Additional Information—Internal control and risk factors—Disclosure controls” and “—Internal control over financial reporting”

   183  

vi


Item

  Form 20-F caption  Location in the document   Page(s)    
      

 

“Financial Statements—Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm—Audit opinion for Form 20-F”

   93  

16

  

 

16A Audit committee financial expert

  

“Corporate Governance—Board and Committee Membership and Attendance”

   52  
  

16B Code of ethics

  

“Additional Information—Other disclosures—Code of Ethics”

   193  
  

16C Principal accountant fees and services

  

“Corporate Governance—Audit Committee—External audit”

   57-58  
    

“Financial Statements—Notes to the consolidated financial statements—3. Operating costs—(e) Auditors’ remuneration”

   110  
  

16D Exemptions from the listing standards for audit committees

  

Not applicable

   –      
  

16E Purchases of equity securities by the issuer and affiliated purchasers

  

Not applicable

   –      
  

16F Change in registrant’s certifying accountant

     –      
  

16G Corporate governance

  

“Additional Information—Other disclosures—Corporate governance practices: differences from New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) listing standards”

   193  
   

16H Mine safety disclosure

  

Not applicable

   –      

17

  

 

Financial statements

  

Not applicable

   –      

18

  

 

Financial statements

  

“Financial Statements—Company accounting policies”

   168-169  
    

“Financial Statements—Notes to the consolidated financial statements—1. Basis of preparation and recent accounting developments”

   102-104  
    

“Financial Statements—Consolidated income statement”; “—Consolidated statement of comprehensive income”; “—Consolidated statement of changes in equity”; “—Consolidated statement of financial position”; and “—Consolidated cash flow statement”

   94-100  
    

“Financial Statements—Notes to the consolidated financial statements – analysis of items in the primary statements”

   102-143  
    

“Financial Statements—Notes to the consolidated financial statements – supplementary information”

   144-167  
      

“Financial Statements—Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm—Audit opinion for Form 20-F”

   93  

19

  

 

Exhibits

  

Filed with the SEC

   –      

vii


LOGO


10C Material contracts

“Additional Information—Other disclosures—Material contracts”

185

10D Exchange controls

“Additional Information—Shareholder information—Exchange controls”

180

10E Taxation

“Additional Information——Shareholder information—Taxation”

182-183

10F Dividends and paying agents

Not applicable

10G Statement by experts

Not applicable

10H Documents on display

“Additional Information—Shareholder information—Documents on display”

180

10I Subsidiary information

Not applicable

11

Quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk

 

11A Quantitative information about market risk

 

“Financial Statements—Notes to the consolidated financial statements—15. Derivative financial instruments”

118-120

Key highlights

  

“Financial Statements—Notes to the consolidated financial statements—30. Financial risk management—(a) Credit risk”; “—(b) Liquidity risk”; “—(c) Interest rate risk”; “—(d) Currency risk”; “—(e) Commodity risk”; “—(f) Capital risk management”; and “—(g) Fair value analysis”2015/16

  
141-148 Financial highlights
  

“Strategic Report—Financial review”

 20-23 

 

11B QualitativeInformation about our reporting

Our financial results are reported in sterling. We convert our US business results at the average exchange rate during the year, which for 2015/16 was $1.47 to £1 (2014/15 $1.58 to £1).

We use adjusted profit measures which exclude the impact of exceptional items and remeasurements. These are used by management to assess the underlying performance of the business. Reconciliations to statutory financial information about market riskare shown on page 196.

Online report

The PDF of our Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16 includes a full search facility. You can find the document by visiting the investor relations section at www.nationalgrid.com and using a word search.

Further information

Throughout this report you can find links to further detail within this document or online. Please look out for the following icon:

LOGO

 

“Financial Statements—Notes to the consolidated financial statements—15. Derivative financial instruments”Adjusted operating profit

£4,096m

+6%

2014/15: £3,863m

Operating profit

£4,085m

+8%

2014/15: £3,780m

Operational highlights

Capital expenditure

£3,893m

+12%

2014/15: £3,470m

Greenhouse gas emissions

(million tonnes carbon dioxide equivalent)

7.3

+0%

2014/15: 7.3

 118-120 

Adjusted earnings per share

63.5p

+10%

2014/15: 57.6p*

Earnings per share

69.0p

+30%

2014/15: 53.2p*

Group safety performance

0.10 IFR

0.03 improvement

2014/15: 0.13 IFR

Employee engagement score

76%

+1%

2014/15: 75%

  

“Financial Statements—Notes to

*Comparative earnings per share (EPS) data has been restated for

   the consolidated financial statements—30. Financial risk management—(a) Credit risk”; “—(b) Liquidity risk”; “—(c) Interest rate risk”; “—(d) Currency risk”; “—(e) Commodity risk”; “—(f) Capital risk management”; and “—(g) Fair value analysis”impact of scrip dividend issues

  141-148

“Strategic Report—Financial review”

20-23

vi


Item

  Form 20-F caption  Location in the document   Page(s)    
      

“Additional Information—Internal Control and Risk factors—Risk Factors”

   173-176  

12

  

 

Description of securities other than equity securities

    
  

12A Debt securities

  

Not applicable

   –      
  

12B Warrants and rights

  

Not applicable

   –      
  

12C Other securities

  

Not applicable

   –      
  

12D American depositary shares

  

“Additional Information—Shareholder information—Description of securities other than equity securities: depositary fees and charges”

   180  
    

“Additional Information—Shareholder information—Depositary payments to the Company”

   180  
      

“Additional Information—Definitions and glossary of terms”

   192-195  

13

  

 

Defaults, dividend arrearages and delinquencies

  

Not applicable

   –      

14

  

 

Material modifications to the rights of security holders and use of proceeds

  

Not applicable

   –      

15

  

 

Controls and procedures

  

“Additional Information—Internal control and risk factors—Disclosure controls” and “—Internal control over financial reporting”

   173  

16

  

 

16A Audit committee financial expert

  

“Corporate Governance—Audit Committee—Experience”

   51  
  

16B Code of ethics

  

“Additional Information—Other disclosures—Code of Ethics”

   184  
  

16C Principal accountant fees and services

  

“Corporate Governance—Audit Committee—External audit”

   52  
    

“Financial Statements—Notes to the consolidated financial statements—3. Operating costs—(e) Auditors’ remuneration”

   102  
  

16D Exemptions from the listing standards for audit committees

  

Not applicable

   –      
  

16E Purchases of equity securities by the issuer and affiliated purchasers

  

Not applicable

   –      
  

16F Change in registrant’s certifying accountant

  

Not applicable

   –      
  

16G Corporate governance

  

“Additional Information—Other disclosures—Corporate governance practices: differences from New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) listing standards”

   184  
   

16H Mine safety disclosure

  

Not applicable

   –      

17

  

 

Financial statements

  

Not applicable

   –      

18

  

 

Financial statements

  

“Financial Statements—Company accounting policies”

   159  
    

“Financial Statements—Notes to the consolidated financial statements—1. Basis of preparation and recent accounting developments”

   94-96  
    

“Financial Statements—Consolidated income statement”; “—Consolidated statement of comprehensive income”; “—Consolidated statement of changes in equity”; “—Consolidated statement of financial position”; and “—Consolidated cash flow statement”

   86-93  
    

“Financial Statements—Notes to the

   94-135  

vii


Item

  Form 20-F caption  Location in the document   Page(s)    
    

consolidated financial statements – analysis of items in the primary statements”

  
    

“Financial Statements—Notes to the consolidated financial statements – supplementary information”

   136-158  
      

“Financial Statements—Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm—Audit opinion for Form 20-F”

   85  

19

  

 

Exhibits

  

Filed with the SEC

   –      

viii


LOGO

national grid
Connecting to life
Annual Report and Accounts 2014/15


LOGO

 

Overview
About National Grid01
 

Our strategy

Our strategy is to be a recognised leader in the development and operation of safe, reliable and sustainable energy infrastructure, to meet the needs of our customers and communities and to generate value for our investors.

LOGO

 

Deliver operational excellence

Achieve world-class levels of safety, reliability, security and customer service.

LOGO

Engage our people

Create an inclusive, high-performance culture by developing all our employees.

LOGO

Stimulate innovation

Promote new ideas to work more efficiently and effectively.

LOGO

Engage externally

Work with external stakeholders to shape UK, EU and US energy policy.

LOGO

Embed sustainability

Integrate sustainability into our decision-making to create value, help preserve natural resources and respect the interests of our communities.

LOGO

Drive growth

Grow our core businesses and develop future new business opportunities.

Contents

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16

LOGO Strategic Report

 

The Strategic Report pages 02–41includes an overview of our strategy and business model, the principal risks we face and information about our performance. In addition to the financial review included within this section, we provide additional analysis and commentary, including the performance of our operating segments, within the unaudited commentary sections of the Financial Statements. This additional analysis forms part of our Strategic Report.

At a glance02
Chairman’s statement0204
Chief Executive’s review04
Operating environment06
Our operating environment08
What we do0810
Our business model1214
Our vision and strategy14
Delivering our strategy – key performance indicators16
Our KPIs18
Financial review2022
Our people24
Principal operations27
Internal control and risk management3826
Viability statement30
Principal operations31
Our people44
  
 Corporate Governance

 

LOGO

Corporate Governance pages 42–75

The Corporate Governance Report, introduced by theour Chairman, contains details about the activities of the Board and its committees during the year, includingyear. We include reports from the Audit, Nominations, Remuneration, Finance, and Safety, Environment and Health Committees, as well asCommittees. We also include details of our shareholder engagement activities.

Corporate Governance contents4246
Directors’ Report and other disclosures5967
Directors’ Remuneration Report6068
 
 Financial Statements

 

LOGO

Our Financial Statements pages 76–163

Includinginclude: the independent auditors’ reports,reports; consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS as adopted by the EU; related commentary and notes to the consolidated financial statements, as well asstatements; and the CompanyCompany’s financial statements prepared in accordance with UK GAAP.FRS 101.

Financial Statements contents7682
Introduction to the financial statementsFinancial Statements83
77
Statement of Directors’ responsibilities7884
Independent auditors’ report85
79
Report of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm
8593
 
  
LOGO Additional Information

 

Additional Information

pages 164–inside back cover

AdditionalThis section includes additional disclosures and information, definitions and a glossary of terms, summary consolidated financial information, and other useful information for shareholders, including contact details for more information or help.

Additional Information contents164174

Definitions and glossary of terms203
Want more information or help?207
Cautionary statement208
We use a number of technical terms and abbreviations within this document. For brevity, we do not define terms or provide explanations every time they are used; please refer to the glossary for this information.

Definitions and glossary of terms192
Want more information or help?196
LOGO

Online

For a full search facility, please goas well as an important notice in relation to the pdf offorward-looking statements with our Annual Report and Accounts 2014/15 in the investor relations section of our website (www.nationalgrid.com) and use a word search.

cautionary statement.

LOGO

 


 

LOGO

About National Grid
Our job is to connect people to the energy they use, safely. We are at the heart of one of the greatest challenges facing our society – delivering clean energy to support our world long into the future.
Financial highlights
Adjusted operating profit1 Adjusted earnings per share1 Operating profit Earnings per share
£3,863m 58.1p £3,780m 53.6p
+5% +9% +1% -18%
2013/14: £3,664m 2013/14: 53.5p2 2013/14: £3,735m 2013/14: 65.7p2
Group return on equity Regulated assets Cash generated from operations Ordinary dividends
11.8% £37.0bn £5,350m 42.87p
+4% +7% +21% +2%
2013/14: 11.4% 2013/14: £34.7bn 2013/14: £4,419m 2013/14: 42.03p
24,274 £3.5bn 0.13IFR 7.3 75%
Employees Capital investment Best overall group safety performance to date Greenhouse gas emissions (million tonnes
carbon dioxide equivalent) Best employee engagement score to date
Our principal operations
UK Electricity Transmission UK Gas Transmission UK Gas Distribution US Regulated Adjusted operating
We own and operate an electricity transmission network and electricity and gas distribution networks serving consumers across the northeastern US.
profit %
We own and maintain the high voltage electricity transmission network in England and Wales, balancing supply with demand on a minute-by-minute basis.
All gas in the UK passes through National Grid’s national transmission system on its way to consumers.
We own and operate four of the eight regional gas distribution networks in Great Britain.
5 32 30 11 22
UK Electricity Transmission
UK Gas Transmission
UK Gas Distribution
US Regulated
Other activities
See page 28 See page 29 See page 30 See pages 33–35
1. Excludes the impact of exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries. See page 186 for more information about these adjusted profit measures.
Important notice
This document contains certain statements that are neither reported financial results nor other historical information. These statements are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. For a description of factors that could affect future results, please refer to the full cautionary statement on the inside back cover and to the risk factors section on pages 173 to 176.
2. Comparative earnings per share (EPS) data has been restated for the impact of the scrip dividend issues.
Our financial results are reported in sterling. The average exchange rate, as detailed on page 87, was $1.58 to £1 in 2014/15 compared with the average rate of $1.62 to £1 in 2013/14. Except as otherwise noted, the figures in this Report are stated in sterling or US dollars.
All references to dollars or $ are to the US currency.
Acting responsibly
We have won Business in the Community’s highest award, Responsible Business of the Year 2014. This accolade acknowledges all of our efforts in getting involved with the things that really matter to us and to society, and doing the right things in the right way.
RESPONSIBLE BUSINESS OF THE YEAR 2014
BUSINESS IN THE COMMUNITY
NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15
01


StrategicNational Grid Annual Report

and Accounts 2015/16
Contents

Chairman’s statement

It’s been a challenging year for the energy sector. Energy policies in the UK and US have continued to evolve against a backdrop of political uncertainty, seeking an acceptable balance between affordability to consumers, security of supply and sustainability considerations.

LOGO

 In focus:

In the UK, we saw debate around the cost of living lead to a sharper focus on the costs of energy and the competitiveness of energy markets. This focus has included an Energy and Climate Change Select Committee inquiry into energy network costs, as well as an investigation by the Competition and Markets Authority into the supply and acquisition of energy in Great Britain.

In the UK, Electricity Market Reform

 The Board is proposing  

 a recommended full-year  dividend of

42.87p

 (2013/14: 42.03p)

(EMR) was implemented successfully, and we saw developments in significant interconnector projects (see page 27). In the US, there were mid-term US congressional and gubernatorial elections and debate continued on essential infrastructure, resilience and sustainability.

Transparency

In January we announced our decision to stop publishing formal Interim Management Statements (IMSs), following the changes in legislation that removed this requirement. Mandatory requirements to publish information can frequently provide an unnecessary focus on matters of little relevance to a long-term business such as National Grid.

Alongside our major announcements at the half year and full year we will continue to provide updates covering market and Company developments.

We also continue to provide commentary on both our IFRS reported results and underlying economic (regulatory) performance, including reconciliations between the key metrics for both results. To help explain this more fully, we have increased the commentary on our regulatory performance on page 23, and have included further analysis of our regulatory performance by segment on page 100. We support the development of an accounting standard for rate-regulated activities, which would reduce the need for additional explanations of our results, and submitted a response to the IASB’s project in January this year.

Dividend

The Board has recommended an increase in the final dividend to 28.16 pence per ordinary share ($2.1866 per American Depositary Share). If approved, this will bring the full-year dividend to 42.87 pence per ordinary share ($3.3584 per American Depositary Share), an increase of 2.0% over the 42.03 pence per ordinary share in respect of the financial year ending 31 March 2014.

In August 2014 we began a share buyback programme designed to operate alongside our scrip dividend option, which we offered for the interim dividend and will offer again for the full-year dividend. The buyback programme, which operates under authorities granted at our 2014 AGM, is designed to balance shareholders’ appetite for the scrip dividend option with our desire to operate an efficient balance sheet with appropriate leverage.

Effective governance

In July 2014, John Pettigrew, who joined the Board in April 2014, became Executive Director, UK and Nick Winser and Maria Richter both stepped down from the Board.

    02

01


    

 

 

Philip Aiken stepped downAdjusted Group operating profit(%)

At a glance

LOGO

We are one of the world’s largest investor-owned utilities focused on transmission and distribution activities in electricity and gas in both the UK and the US. We play a vital role in connecting millions of people to the energy they use, safely, reliably and efficiently. We are organised into four operating segments, along with other activities.

UK Electricity TransmissionUK Gas Transmission

We own and operate the electricity transmission network in England and Wales, with day-to-day responsibility for balancing supply and demand. We operate but do not own the Scottish networks. Our networks comprise approximately 7,200 kilometres (4,470 miles) of overhead line, 1,500 kilometres (932 miles) of underground cable and 338 substations.

We own and operate the gas national transmission system in Great Britain, with day-to-day responsibility for balancing supply and demand. Our network comprises approximately 7,660 kilometres (4,760 miles) of high pressure pipe and 24 compressor stations. In 2015/16, the gas throughput across the system was more than 80 billion cubic metres.

Adjusted operating profit

Adjusted operating profit

Adjusted operating profit

£4,096m£1,173m£486m

2014/15: £3,863m

2014/15: £1,237m2014/15: £437m

Capital expenditure

Capital expenditure

Capital expenditure

£3,893m£1,084m£186m

2014/15: £3,470m

2014/15: £1,074m2014/15: £184m

UK regulated return on equity (RoE)%

LOGO

02National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Strategic Report


   Strategic Report

UK Gas DistributionUS RegulatedOther Activities
We own and operate four gas distribution networks comprising approximately 131,000 kilometres (81,400 miles) of pipeline. We transport gas from the Boardnational transmission system to around 10.9 million consumers on behalf of 39 shippers.

Electricity: We jointly own and operate transmission facilities across upstate New York, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island and Vermont. We own and operate electricity distribution networks in February 2015 before his appointment as Balfour Beatty’s new Chairman. He was a National Grid Non-executive Director for six yearsupstate New York, Massachusetts and played an important role in chairing our Safety, EnvironmentRhode Island. The assets we operate include 174 kilometres (108 miles) of underground cable, 491 transmission substations and Health Committee. Following Philip’s departure, Paul Golby was appointed as chairman of the Safety, Environment and Health Committee, as well as a member of the Audit Committee. Paul remains a member of the Nominations and Remuneration Committees.688 distribution substations.

 

Tom King stepped down fromGas: We own and operate gas distribution networks across the Boardnortheastern US, located in upstate New York, New York City, Long Island, Massachusetts and leftRhode Island. We forecast, plan for and procure around 16 billion standard cubic metres of gas each year.

Our other activities mainly relate to non-regulated businesses and other commercial operations not included within the Companybusiness segments including: interconnectors; UK-based gas metering activities; UK property management; a UK LNG import terminal; US LNG operations; US unregulated transmission pipelines; and corporate activities.

Adjusted operating profit

Adjusted operating profit

Adjusted operating profit

£878m£1,185m£374m

2014/15: £826m

2014/15: £1,164m2014/15: £199m

Capital expenditure

Capital expenditure

Capital expenditure

£549m£1,856m£218m

2014/15: £498m

2014/15: £1,501m

2014/15: £213m

US Regulated RoE

(calculated on 31 March 2015. He was succeeded by Dean Seavers, who joined the Company in December 2014 and, following a thorough handover, joined the Board as Executive Director, US with effect from 1 April 2015.calendar year)%

 

JohnLOGO

National Grid Annual Report and Dean’s appointments bring fresh perspective, experience and challenge to our Board. Dean joined us afterAccounts 2015/16At a career that has included business leadership roles of major divisions within GE, United Technologies and Tyco. In particular, he has led major change and performance improvement programmes that have improved operational efficiency and customer satisfaction – important priorities for our US business.glance03


Chairman’s statement

Balancing the three elements of the energy trilemma – security of supply, the cost of energy and environmental sustainability – continues to contribute towards a dynamic environment in the energy industry.

 

I would likeLOGO

“Being responsible and

 sustainable is central

 to thank Nick, Tom, Philip and Maria for their commitment to the Board and the very valuable contribution they have made.

National Grid’s UK regulated entities appointed Catherine Bell and Clive Elphick as Non-executive Directors with effect from 1 April 2014. The appointment of two Non-executive Directors is a new requirement promoted by Ofgem, which has termed the appointments Sufficiently Independent Directors. The arrangements are designed to enhance the financial ring-fencing conditions that already exist in the companies’ licences.

Responsible business

At National Grid, we believe thatboth what we do

 and how we do it are equally important. In July 2014, National Grid was named Responsible Business of the Year 2014 by Business in the Community (BITC). To win this award we had to demonstrate how we operate responsibly in everything we do, and how we are improving the outcomes for society through our work.it”

 

    LOGO

  

As you can read on page 17,we continue to invest in the future performance of our business, we are adding new KPIsstriving to our reporting, so we can more fully reflectmeet the issues that really matter tochallenges of the Company and our stakeholders.energy trilemma. For our 2014/15this year’s Annual Report, we have included workforce diversity as a new KPIdescribed the challenge in more detail, highlighting developments during 2015/16 and you can read more about our approach to this on pages 18 and 19, as well as progress in relation to our Board diversity policy on page 58.

response. You can find more information about our approach to being a responsible business, including our Total Contribution Report, on our website.

Looking ahead

We will face both opportunities and challenges over the coming year. For example, in the UK Ofgem has concluded its Integrated Transmission Planning and Regulation project. As part of this, the System Operator is expected to undertake a number of new advisory roles. We have a long track record in successfully managing potential conflicts of interest from our System Operator role and will work closely with Ofgem to make sure this continues.

In the US we expect to file important applications for new rate plans – you can read more about this on page 169. Wepages 8–9.

As part of our response, we need a strong leadership team that combines a deep knowledge of the industry with fresh insight. Over the past year we have had a number of changes to the Company’s leadership, which I believe have secured continuity, while complementing the strong range of skills and experience we need for the challenges and opportunities ahead.

In November, we announced that Steve Holliday had informed the Board that he wished to retire as CEO and leave the Company in 2016. Steve stepped down as CEO at the end of March and was succeeded by John Pettigrew, who was previously Executive Director of our UK operations.

Steve, who will continueremain on the Board until 22 July to worksupport John with policymakers,the transition, has made a significant contribution to the energy sector and National Grid. Under his leadership the Company has delivered excellent returns for shareholders, helping establish National Grid’s place as one of the world’s leading utilities.

Throughout his tenure as CEO, Steve has remained committed to our people, our customers and stakeholders to transform the energy industry through initiativescommunities we serve. This commitment has included leading the drive for greater levels of safety, as well as playing a leading role in Massachusetts, New York,the debate on creating employment opportunities for young people – championing the role businesses can play in providing good careers advice and Rhode Island (see pages 33 to 35).encouraging the growth of STEM education and engineering.

 

We must adapt to developmentsJohn’s appointment followed a very thorough and rigorous selection process, carried out by the Nominations Committee. The Committee, and subsequently the Board, was unanimous in corporate governance requirements. For example,its support for John, given his experience covering our UK and US operations. He was the updatedarchitect of our strategy for delivery and performance under the UK Corporate Governance Code enhancesregulatory regime, RIIO. He also played a pivotal role in introducing improvements and demonstrating strong leadership within both the quality of information investors can expect to receive about the long-term healthUS Electricity Transmission and strategy of listed companies, and encourages companies to be more transparent about risk management and internal control.Distribution businesses.

 

Finally, I am confident that our people will continue to help make National Grid a company we can all be proud of and I thank all our employees for their hard work and commitment to our success.Responsible business

LOGO

Sir Peter Gershonwww.nationalgrid.com/responsibility

 

  
Our KPIs
pages 18–21

04National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Strategic Report


 

 

LOGO   Strategic Report

In focus

The Board is proposing

a recommended full-year

dividend of

43.34p

Corporate Governance

pages 46–81

We will also be welcoming Nicola Shaw onto the Board as Executive Director, UK from 1 July 2016. Apart from the appointment of Dean Seavers on 1 April 2015, as we described in last year’s Annual Report and Accounts, there have been no other changes to the Board composition over the past year.

John and Nicola’s appointments highlight the importance of succession planning and this will remain an important area of focus for the Nominations Committee and the Board. Effective succession planning for both Executive and Non-executive Director positions helps make sure we have the right mix of skills and experience to manage change as the Company evolves.

Viability statement

During 2015/16 the Board reviewed and approved the Company’s principal risks. This played an important part in the Board’s approval of the new viability statement required by the 2014 UK Corporate Governance Code. You can read more about our viability statement on page 30.

Our UK Gas Distribution business

The Board regularly reviews the composition and balance of the Company’s portfolio. As part of this, we have begun a process for the potential sale of a majority stake in our UK Gas Distribution business.

We believe that the Company can deliver best value to shareholders through maintaining a portfolio of businesses with strong operational performance, alongside annual asset growth of around 5–7%, based on a long-term assumption of 3% in respect of UK RPI. The sale of a majority stake in our UK Gas Distribution business is expected to increase this growth rate towards the upper end of the range.

Following completion of a sale, the Board expects to return substantially all of the net proceeds to shareholders. We also expect to maintain the strong balance sheet that allows the Group to continue to fund its investment programme. The process is likely to be completed in early 2017.

Dividend

Our dividend policy aims to grow the ordinary dividend at least in line with the rate of RPI inflation each year. Accordingly, the Board has recommended an increase in the final dividend to 28.34 pence per ordinary share ($2.0445 per American Depositary

Share). If approved, this will bring the full-year dividend to 43.34 pence per ordinary share ($3.1768 per American Depositary Share), an increase of 1.1% over the 42.87 pence per ordinary share in respect of the financial year ended 31 March 2015.

Responsible business

At the start of 2016, the United Nation’s 17 goals to ‘transform our world’ officially came into force. The Sustainable Development Goals call on all countries to promote prosperity while protecting the planet. Business has an important role to play in helping achieve these goals. By being responsible and sustainable we can all make a positive difference to people’s lives and to our planet.

At National Grid, being responsible and sustainable is central to both what we do and how we do it. In the UK we are now an accredited Living Wage employer. We have come to the end of our two-year employee chosen charity partnership with Macmillan Cancer Support. I am very pleased to say that our UK employees have raised more than £600,000 and this money has been used by Macmillan to provide fuel grants for more than 3,000 people living with or recovering from cancer. I am looking forward to seeing which charity our employees choose next for us to support.

In the US, our energy efficiency programmes are making a real difference in helping our customers reduce their energy use. The American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE) scored all three states in which we operate among the top 10 for energy efficiency.

As you can read on page 18, we have added new KPIs to our reporting, so we can more fully reflect the issues that really matter to the Company and our stakeholders. For our 2015/16 Annual Report, we have included KPIs for our community engagement and for the work we do in support of education and skills. Both of these issues are important to us. We want to see the communities in which we operate thrive, and we want to see more young people studying STEM subjects because there are not enough young people coming through into engineering.

You can find more information about our approach to being a responsible business on our website.

We know there are areas where we can improve. As John describes in his CEO review, we did not meet some of our customer satisfaction targets, and we must continue to build on our safety performance.

Looking ahead

We support the work that Ofgem is undertaking to explore the introduction of onshore competition. However, we believe that competition should only be taken forward where it is in the best interests of consumers.

As the energy market continues to evolve, the role of the GB System Operator (SO) has also been a matter of debate with both Ofgem and DECC and we are currently in detailed discussion on what greater independence for the SO means in practice. We recognise the need to continue strengthening the management of potential conflicts of interest between our Transmission Operator (TO) and SO roles, but do not believe that creating an independent SO is in the interests of consumers, given the need to focus on security of supply.

Due to the nature of our business, we recognise that our critical national infrastructure systems are a potential target for cyber threats. We will continue to invest in strategies that aim to protect our business in the UK and US, and which keep pace with the increasing scale and sophistication of threats.

We also need to continue raising awareness of cyber security across the Company, addressing our attitudes and behaviour towards it as an issue, making security breaches less likely to happen.

I would like to extend my deepest appreciation to the management team and all our employees for their hard work, dedication and commitment to the Company’s success.

LOGO

Sir Peter Gershon

Chairman

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Chairman’s statement05


Chief Executive’s review

It’s an exciting time to be part of the energy industry, and I’m looking forward

to working with my leadership team on the opportunities that lie ahead.

LOGO

I firmly believe that through a high performance culture we will continue to find better ways of serving our customers – setting expectations, being honest about what we can deliver, then consistently delivering on our promises. However, customer needs are evolving with much greater engagement, awareness, and a desire to manage their energy use.

That’s why we are developing the way we think and work at National Grid – improving our end-to-end processes, removing waste and focusing on the things that create value for our customers. We have done more work during the year to develop this high performance culture and it will remain an important part of how we develop as a Company.

Our employees continue to show their commitment to the communities we serve. Our UK and US businesses have delivered over 18,000 interactions with young people, encouraging the development of the skills and capabilities needed to gain meaningful employment. Overall, we invest time and resources equivalent to a value over £14 million each year in the communities where we work.

Our UK business

As Sir Peter describes, we have begun a process for the potential sale of a majority stake in our UK Gas Distribution business. We have been working on how we separate Gas Distribution from National Grid, so we can create a stand-alone business that is ready for sale. We want to make sure it has the people, assets, systems and technology it needs to be successful in the future.

In the UK, where there are continuing concerns about electricity capacity margins, we contracted additional balancing services of 2.4 GW for the winter period to be available to help manage periods of peak demand.

This includes 133 MW from demand side balancing reserve arrangements, including businesses that signed up for reducing demand at peak periods if called on – for example, by turning off air conditioning for a period – in return for payment.

We have also launched the Power Responsive programme, which is designed to help growth in DSR. You can read more about this on pages 34 and 35.

I’m delighted to have been asked by the Board to take over as CEO of National Grid and lead the Company into its next chapter.

Having joined the Company 25 years ago, as a graduate, I’ve been fortunate that the opportunities and challenges I’ve had from moving around all parts of the organisation, in both the UK and US, have never failed to motivate and inspire me – both personally and professionally.

I’ve also been fortunate to have worked closely with Steve Holliday over the past ten years. Under Steve’s leadership, the Company has transformed its performance and culture, helping place National Grid at the heart of the energy industry. He leaves a great legacy for us to build on.

I now look forward to continuing the great work we are doing with our customers, shareholders, partners and employees to meet the challenges and opportunities of the changing UK and US energy landscapes.

On 1 July, Nicola Shaw joins National Grid as Executive Director for our UK business. Nicola joins us from High Speed 1, where she was CEO for the last five years, managing and maintaining the UK’s high-speed railway infrastructure. I very much look forward to working with her when she joins our business.

I would like to thank Ian Galloway for his tremendous support as UK Chief Operating Officer while we were seeking to make an appointment to the UK Executive Director role.

Our performance during 2015/16

Our business has delivered a strong performance during 2015/16.

In the UK, we have had our safest year ever, while in the US our performance continues to improve – we have seen fewer injuries and had fewer people taking time off due to an injury than ever before. However, we want to build on this performance and further reduce risks. We will focus on the causes of incidents and find more opportunities to learn from them and share best practice.

Reliability across our networks has remained very strong throughout the year. In the US, our electricity distribution system delivered solid performance with continued recognition of our storm response processes. In the UK, despite the ongoing concerns over tightening electricity margins, our SO business has managed the challenges extremely well.

Our commitment to our customers is critical to our future success. In the UK, we have exceeded our two electricity and gas transmission customer satisfaction targets. In the US, we did not meet our targets due to customer concerns about higher than normal winter bills.

06National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Strategic Report


   Strategic Report

     

was delighted that the judging panel commended our long-term vision based on trust and connectivity. They noted our foresight in using technology and innovationlook forward to develop solutions that protect our employees, customers and wider society; and recognised our appetite to inspire others.continuing

 the great work we are

 doing with our customers,  shareholders, partners

 and employees”

  

  LOGO

In the UK, we are in discussions with the Living Wage Foundation about the opportunity to become a fully accredited Living Wage employer. We can confirm that all our UK employees fulfil the criteria for accreditation. We are also working through the Living Wage Charter to understand the impact it would have on our supply chain, including the companies our suppliers use as sub-contractors, should we decide to adopt it.

 

LOGO

In focus

Employee

engagement score

76%

(2014/15: 75%)

Our KPIs

pages 18–21

Principal operations

pages 31–43

On 12 May 2016, Ofgem announced a mid-term review. As expected, the scope of this review is narrow with no changes to key financial parameters. We welcome Ofgem’s continued commitment to the clarity and certainty offered by the eight-year RIIO framework. Ofgem will run a consultation process this summer, with any changes to be implemented in April next year.

In addition, the Company has been working with DECC and Ofgem to consider how to evolve the current SO model, to make it more independent, while remaining cost effective. In doing so, it is vital that there is no disruption to the pivotal role we play as SO in balancing the network.

Our US business

America’s gas and electricity networks, most of which were originally constructed during the nation’s ambitious post-World War II building boom, have served us well over the last half-century.

But times have changed. We need to advance the country’s natural gas and electricity infrastructure beyond its 20th century limitations, by creating a more customer-centric, resilient, agile, efficient and environmentally sound energy network.

We call our approach to this Connect21, and you can read more about our work to support it on pages 38–41. For example, we’ve created our New Energy Solutions team, which is looking at how we promote cleaner energy, improving efficiency, affordability, and choice for customers by delivering state-mandated initiatives.

In order to continue investing in our networks and improving our service to customers, we filed three rate cases in 2015 – one in Massachusetts and two in downstate New York. These three proposals are undergoing a thorough review process by the regulators in each state.

Also during 2015/16, we backed the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) proposed Carbon Pollution Standards for New and Existing Power Plants (known as the Clean Power Plan). As we and other organisations have requested, the EPA’s final Plan provides states with compliance flexibility and makes sure that early emissions reductions via investments in renewable resources and energy efficiency strategies are counted.

Our people

The initiatives and achievements I’ve described are testament to the hard work of our people. I believe that developing the skills and capabilities of our employees is crucial to our success, so I’m really pleased that we delivered more than 154,000 days of technical, safety, leadership and personal effectiveness training across our global workforce during 2015/16.

I was also delighted to see that in our most recent employee engagement survey we achieved an engagement score of 76% – our highest since we started conducting Group-wide surveys of our people.

I would like to thank all my colleagues at National Grid for their contribution and ongoing commitment to our business.

Priorities for the year ahead

Maximising value from our core businesses and delivering safe, reliable networks will continue to be our top priorities. In addition, in 2016/17 we are focused on completing the sale of a majority stake in our UK Gas Distribution business and will continue to file for new rates to support our US business.

Longer-term priorities

Customer first

We must be close to our customers, so we can respond to their changing needs and deliver an outstanding service. As customer requirements evolve, so must National Grid. This will bring further opportunities to grow and drive value.

Performance optimisation

Everyone in our Company should see performance optimisation as part of the day job – constantly working efficiently and doing things better. If we are to succeed, we must maintain and further strengthen the Group’s high performance culture.

Growth

We have strong growth potential and see opportunities in all our regions and businesses. We expect to sustain a high level of investment in our regulated business in the UK and US as well as exploring new business opportunities over the medium term. We will, however, only invest in projects that meet our strict investment criteria and represent the best value for shareholders.

Evolve for the future

With the growing rate of renewables, distributed generation and, over time, energy storage, our industry is changing. We need to make sure we are at the forefront of this, continuing our involvement in industry discussions so we can keep abreast of the changes, and make sure we evolve for the future.

LOGO

John Pettigrew
Chief Executive
 

 

        NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/1503                                
National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Chief Executive’s review07


Strategic ReportLOGO

 

Our operating environment

Chief Executive’s reviewThe cost of energy

In Saratoga, New York, we have supported customer Quad Graphics with an energy efficiency incentive offer of $1,095,000. Our support is helping achieve significant energy savings while boosting productivity.

Read more on page 41.

LOGO

Security of supply

When we assessed the margin for the winter of 2015/16, we procured additional commercial tools that raised the margin to a tight but manageable 5.1%.

Read more on page 34.

LOGO

Sustainability

Decarbonising domestic heat remains one of the major challenges in society’s energy trilemma, so our Gas Distribution business is developing sources of renewable gas that can be transported through our existing networks.

Read more on page 36.

 

LOGO

Our operating environment is shaped by the ‘trilemma’, which has become the standard way to assess energy systems, as it simply articulates the three distinct objectives that need to be met in providing energy to consumers, but which are often in tension.

Regulatory changes are a response to choices that governments make in seeking to appropriately balance these often conflicting objectives.

I’m really proud of our performance this year. Overall, our businesses in both the UK and US achieved a strong operating performance.

 

LOGO08

 In focus:

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16

In the UK, there has been a lot of public focus on how secure and reliable our energy supply is, particularly on tighter margins between electricity supply and demand in the winter. Despite tighter margins than previous years, we were able to operate the system without calling upon our additional reserve. This was because of stronger than expected plant availability, mild weather,

Strategic Report

 Employee

 engagement score                

75%

 (2013/14: 71%)

healthy wind output and consistent interconnector imports from France and the Netherlands.

We also tendered the two new balancing services for additional reserves of supply. Although these additional reserves were not used, this was a sensible precaution in case of colder weather or a series of unexpected plant shutdowns.

In the US, we saw an extremely harsh and prolonged period of plunging temperatures and record levels of snowfall in parts of New England, particularly in February and March. Again, our network resilience held up well. We have invested millions of dollars in both our electricity and gas infrastructure to improve resilience and help reduce the impact of service interruptions.

In December 2014 we received an award for excellence in energy efficiency from Platts Global Energy. Platts commended us for ongoing initiatives to upgrade equipment, reduce emissions, and improve safety and network efficiency. And in March 2015, the Edison Electric Institute presented us with its Emergency Recovery Award for our power restoration efforts following the severe ice storm in northern New York in December 2013.

Safety

Safety remains a hugely important priority for us. Regrettably, there were two fatalities during the year – a member of the public in the UK who fell when climbing on one of our pipelines, and a contractor at our Rhode Island gas distribution business. Despite these incidents, we achieved our best-ever Group safety performance during 2014/15. We can never be complacent about our performance and must continually strive to improve.

Our operations

We have continued to provide good value and reliability for customers while keeping our element of bills as low as possible.

We are totally committed to providing the best value we can for our customers, investors and other stakeholders, so we’re working hard to make sure we are being as efficient as possible in everything we do. To help achieve this, we have continued to develop a way of working we call ‘Performance Excellence’, which you can read about on page 27. We also reorganised our UK business to increase clarity around what we do and who is accountable.

In the US, we finally completed the stabilisation work on our new financial systems (see page 34). This fixed a number of long-standing problems, such as inefficient payroll processing, which had previously required expensive manual interventions. Long term,

    04


 

   Strategic Report

 

 

 

the robust data we can produce with the new systems is an essential foundation to the future performance improvements and regulatory filings that we need for profitable growth in the US. 

 

It is increasingly recognised in the US that investment levels in some areas will need to rise compared with the earlier part of this decade, and we have seen increased activity this year, making it our highest ever year of US investment. 

In December 2014 the NYPSC approved $200 million gas infrastructure investment in Long Island to speed up the replacement of ageing pipe and extend the use of natural gas to more customers.

The NYPSC also published the results of the regulatory audit of our New York gas companies. These audits are a regular feature of the New York regulatory process. The audit was broadly supportive of our performance and structure and, as is usual, made some helpful recommendations for further improvement. We have responded with an implementation plan to provide these benefits on behalf of New York customers.

As you can read on pages 18 and 19, our customer satisfaction scores were mixed. We exceeded our UK electricity and gas transmission targets. However, we did not meet our US targets and I recognise this is an area in which we must improve.

Responsible Business of the Year

As Sir Peter has described in his statement, National Grid was named Responsible Business of the Year 2014, which is BITC’s top award. I am extremely proud of this achievement, which is terrific recognition of how we are running a responsible and sustainable business, bringing long-term benefits to society. Although BITC is a UK body, the award was given to the entire Company and recognises the excellent work we’re doing across our entire service area in the UK and US.

For example, in the UK we are completing a test line for the T-pylon at our training academy. It is smaller than the existing lattice towers and provides communities with added choice. Our property business entered into a new arrangement with the Berkeley Group to develop a number of our sites in London and the surrounding area. The first phase of investments could lead to the development of over 7,000 new homes, including affordable housing, alongside schools and public spaces.

Our EmployAbility programme provides supported internship opportunities for students with additional learning needs. Now into its second year, we have extended the programme and will continue to do this across more of our UK sites.

We are helping schools, parents and children see engineering as a modern, dynamic, desirable sector with a great future. Our careers education programmes in the UK include Careers Lab, an initiative we developed that has now been taken up by BITC. It links working professionals with schools LOGO

  

 

to bring the world of work to life for secondary school children. Our US initiatives include partnering with seven local community colleges to deliver energy utility technology training programmes that are designed to equip people for jobs in the energy industry. We are doing a great deal of work in this area, as you can read on page 24.

All this is business as usual for us – the BITC recognition is not the result of any special new initiative we have done to win the award. But it would not have been possible without the efforts of our employees. I was delighted to see that the results of our 2015 employee opinion survey – a good measure of how satisfied employees are with their employer – included an engagement score of 75% – our highest since we started conducting Group-wide employee opinion surveys.

I would like to thank all our people for making a positive impact, through their work for National Grid, their volunteering and fundraising achievements, and by getting involved in activities that really matter to us and to society.

Priorities for 2015/16

Safety: continue to build on our strong performance so we can achieve a consistent world-class safety performance;

Customers and stakeholders: improve the service we provide for our customers and continue to build trust among our stakeholders;

Performance Excellence: focus on being efficient in our end-to-end processes so we can continue to improve our overall performance and efficiency; and

Regulatory filings: prepare and file applications for new rate plans in New York, Long Island and Massachusetts.

LOGO

Steve Holliday

LOGO

LOGO
  LOGO

LOGO

 

     NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/1505


Strategic Report

LOGO

Operating environment

The UK economy has been recovering steadily in the past year, with 2.6%

economic growth, falling unemployment and falling inflation.

  

Growth in the fourth quarterThe cost of 2014, however, dropped to 0.5% as sluggish eurozone growth depressed exports and wider geopolitical events increased the perceived risk of investment. In the US, employment levels have continued to rise. The Federal Reserve ended its quantitative easing programme of bond purchases, though treasury yields continue to be at or near

historical lows. GDP increased 2.4% in 2014, although growth in the first quarter of 2015 was only 0.2%.

Below, we highlight our main market drivers and the impact they have on our business.

Market driver

Impact

Changing energy mix

Changing fuel costs and environmental programmes are affecting traditional electricity generation

UK

In February 2015 DECC announced the results of the first Contracts for Difference (CfD) auction allocation rounds, with wind technology making up the bulk of contracted generation. Continued support for solar PV through Feed in Tariffs (FiTs) and the Renewables Obligation contributed to growth in installed solar PV.

Older fossil fuel plants continue to face the challenge of environmental regulations while the new nuclear plant at Hinkley received State Aid approval from the European Commission in October 2014.

US

In the US, shale gas development has continued to keep national wholesale prices low.

Environmental Protection Agency regulations have led to generator retirements or increased costs for compliance.

Renewables are growing their share of electricity generation and account for a significant amount of newly installed capacity. Distributed generation, such as rooftop solar, has grown substantially in our service territory.

This could lead to significant network investment opportunities

UK

Increasing deployment of large-scale wind, large-scale solar  PV and nuclear will require more investment in transmission networks to connect new plant and reinforce the network. Variable output from solar PV and wind makes balancing demand and supply more challenging.

More interconnection between the UK and adjacent European markets will deliver net benefits to the UK.

US

Lower national wholesale gas prices have increased the amount of gas used for electric generation, causing constraints into the northeast US.

Oil to gas conversions will continue as gas maintains its price advantage. New interstate gas pipeline capacity is needed to overcome growing gas demand.

The electric transmission system will need upgrades and rebalancing due to generation retirements and to connect new renewable sources. Increasing amounts of distributed generation, particularly solar, will require investment in the electric distribution network.

Energy policy

 

  Security of supplySustainability

Commentary

 

Sustainability,

The cost of the energy we use is an issue for consumers, industry, energy providers, regulators and governments.

Consumers expect a reliable energy system that delivers gas and electricity when and where it is needed. They pay for the cost of this infrastructure and improvements to it through the network costs part of their energy bills. The costs are subject to regulatory approval.

The energy system is in a phase of transition from high to low carbon. Coal plants are closing down and being replaced with nuclear, renewables and gas.

During the transition, electricity margins need to be monitored and actively managed as we move to a generation mix with greater volumes of intermittent generation.

Evidence shows our climate is changing because of the emission of greenhouse gases resulting from human activity. The bulk of emissions derive from the demand for energy for power, heating and transport.

Developments

The UK Competition and Markets Authority has concluded its investigation into the energy market and set out numerous remedies, including proposals to address locational pricing on the electricity transmission network.

In May 2016, Ofgem stated that it will undertake a mid-period review of the RIIO outputs for our transmission businesses.

In the US, consumers have experienced rising costs for energy over the past three winters. Regulators are seeking to encourage investment in infrastructure and new technology to bring down costs and help consumers manage their energy use.

Energy security is the UK Government’s number one priority on energy. It is reviewing the capacity market and incentives so that market arrangements bring forward new generation of supplyall technologies at the right time – so that new generation capacity is built. The Government also signed an agreement for a new nuclear power station at Hinkley Point.

In the US, regulators are seeking investment in infrastructure to improve the security and affordability underpin EU policy

Against a difficult economic and financial background, the EU’sresilience of energy policy is underpinned by sustainability, security of supply and affordability. In October 2014 the EU heads of state agreed the EU’s 2030 Climate Change and Energy Framework. This includes a 40% reduction target for carbon emissions, alongside other objectives for renewables, energy efficiency and interconnections.networks while also decarbonising those networks.

 

Negotiations for a new international agreement on climate change continuedconcluded in Paris at the twentieth21st session of the Conference of Parties (COP20) in Lima(COP21) in December 2014. Nations are looking2015. A commitment to the Paris worldwide conferencehave clear goals and a system of governance and review were put in 2015 as the next opportunity to work out a new climate change deal.place.

 

Finally, the creation of a ‘genuine energy union’ was highlighted as oneThe published advice of the main prioritiesClimate Change Committee is that the UK’s fifth carbon budget should be a target of the new European Commission, which took office57% reduction on 1990 levels between 2028 and 2032. Legislation is expected to be proposed in November 2014.summer 2016.

The US EPA’s Clean Power Plan sets standards for power plants and agrees state level targets for reductions in carbon emissions.

 

Policy decisions can affect our investment needs and compliance obligations

Greater levels of market integration, interconnection and renewable generation are fundamental to achieving the EU’s policy objectives.

 

While European developments present challenges, the significant level of investment required will create opportunities for growth. For example, potential future interconnector opportunities include connections between the UK and France, Ireland, Denmark and Iceland. Such opportunities would help the EU achieve its interconnection targets. See page 27 for more information about our interconnector projects.Our response

 

 

UK energy policies are attracting investment and there is significant political focus on reducing costs for consumersresponse

Energy policy continues to evolve from the Climate Change Act 2008, which commits the UK Government to reducing UK greenhouse gas emissions to at least 80% lower than a 1990 baseline by 2050. The Energy Act 2013 implements the main aspects of EMR, and puts in place measures to attract the investment needed. The run-up to the General Election in May 2015, saw a sharp focus on the costs of energy and the competitiveness of energy markets.

 

 

National GridUK response

Group response

We are investing up to £16 billion over the eight years to 2021 to make sure Britain’s energy system is centralfit and ready to support a low-carbon economy. Despite this significant increase in investment, our network costs will remain flat in real terms over the deliverycoming years.

All network costs are heavily scrutinised through the UK energy regulator Ofgem and are the only part of EMRconsumers’ bills that are regulated. Ofgem’s incentives encourage innovation, so if we are more efficient, consumers share the benefits.

US response

Improving the customer experience and active on driving downhelping ratepayers manage their energy costs is a critical component of our business operations. To help reduce New England’s energy costs, we are partnering with the developer of one major proposed regional pipeline expansion project to improve transport capacity, upgrade existing facilities, and enhance market area storage assets.

National Grid has been performing itsWe are supporting the UK Government by providing analysis through our role as delivery body for the Government on EMR, as described on page 39.Electricity Market Reform (EMR).

 

The focus onWe have put in place new products to ensure that the cost of energy is importantSO has the right tools to National Grid.maintain supplies over winter. We are working hard to highlight to our stakeholders how the RIIO regulatory framework is helping us todeveloping DSR products that reduce costs for consumers while creating incentives for vital investment.reliance on traditional generation sources.

 

We have also started construction on two new interconnectors (see page 43).

US response

In addition to supporting new investments in gas and electricity infrastructure projects, we have submitted grid modernisation proposals that aim to improve the region’s reliability, sustainability and affordability of its energy supply and services. We have filed rate cases in Massachusetts and New York proposing to update our distribution rates.

  

      06


Reducing greenhouse gas emissions forms part of the Company’s KPIs (see page 21).

 

UK response

We have facilitated the connection of 4.5 GW of solar PV generation at the distribution network level, working with industry to remove barriers to entry and find solutions to network operability issues.

We have set out our vision for the Future of Gas, exploring opportunities to bring forward bio-substitute natural gas and compressed natural gas vehicle fuels.

US response

We continue to support the EPA’s Clean Power Plan, the Northeast’s cap-and-trade scheme of the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, and other state-level initiatives. We also support technological partners and innovative tools, such as energy storage, electric transportation and distributed generation, which can help meet sustainability and energy diversity objectives.

 

Market driver

Impact

US policy is evolving to meet environmental and energy diversity goals

In the US, many federal level developments have been through federal agency regulations and Presidential executive orders. At a state level, energy policy continues to evolve in the northeastern US, driven by interest in promoting energy efficiency, maintaining reliability and deploying renewable technologies that help meet environmental and energy diversity goals.

Options for increased renewable and distributed generation are being explored

In the US, the impact on natural gas dependency has resulted in an evaluation of the best way of increasing fuel diversity through renewable and distributed generation resources. We continue to support movement towards a clean energy economy; and support additional measures to increase America’s energy productivity.

Regulation

Infrastructure investment needs must be balanced with affordabilityWe must accommodate customers’ cost concerns and also provide safe, up-to-date systems

Regulators acknowledge that there is a significant need for infrastructure investment. However, affordability continues to be a primary concern.

Ageing gas mains can be riskier to use and can contribute to greenhouse gas emissions through leaks. Regulators and policymakers are asking utilities to put plans in place to strengthen their networks’ ability to withstand the effects of severe weather.

We must accommodate our customers’ affordability concerns while fulfilling our obligations to provide safe and reliable services and upgrading our systems. Investment is required for new connections, to meet the challenges of changing supply and demand patterns, and to replace ageing infrastructure in the UK and US.

UK regulators want greater efficiency and innovation

In the UK, the regulatory focus during the year has been on the RIIO price controls which give greater focus to incentives and innovation than the previous regulatory regime.

We continue to be engaged in the debate on the regulatory approach to electricity transmission investment, stemming from the projected increase in offshore wind generation and interconnection.

This is driving them to favour more market competition

In the UK, competition is already in place for offshore development and Ofgem has stated its intent to retain the option of using greater competition for certain large onshore projects.

For more information about network efficiency and innovation, see pages 27 to 31.

In the UK, Ofgem is reviewing the arrangements for planning and delivering Britain’s transmission networks

We are facing new challenges from an ageing infrastructure and a changing energy mix. Technical developments and innovation also mean that there could be opportunities to coordinate and integrate those investments.

The Integrated Transmission Planning and Regulation (ITPR) project is looking at long-term challenges such as ageing infrastructure, the changing energy mix, technical developments and innovation, to assess whether the regulatory arrangements currently in place are sufficient to ensure coordination and efficiency in the future planning of electricity transmission.

We need to make sure the network is planned in an economic, efficient and coordinated way

Ofgem has proposed enhancing our role as System Operator (SO) so that the SO has a greater role in system planning. No organisation is currently responsible for taking an overarching view of system development, so opportunities for coordination can potentially be missed. We are working with Ofgem to develop the framework for how the system will be planned and how assets will be managed.

US regulators are focused on system modernisation and integration of new distributed energy resources

State officials in Massachusetts and New York have approved gas system investment programmes to accelerate replacement of ageing infrastructure. The Massachusetts Grid Modernization proceeding and New York’s Reforming the Energy Vision effort both focus on deploying advanced electric grid capabilities to improve reliability, more fully exploit distributed energy resources, and provide new opportunities for customers to control their energy use.

Investments to modernise networks and integrate distributed resources will offer new options and value to customers

We are expanding gas system enhancement investment programmes and are developing electric grid modernisation plans. Through our regulatory efforts and stakeholder engagement we are seeking to create a regulatory framework that integrates distributed energy resources into the electric grid in a way that is cost effective and delivers benefits to customers.

In the US, FERC is reforming transmission planning and promoting competition in the transmission industry

FERC issued Order 1000 in 2011 to improve transmission planning and increase competition in the transmission industry. Policies to comply with the Order took effect in New York and New England in 2014 and 2015, respectively.

Competitive transmission planning provides opportunities for us

Order 1000 has opened our service territory to competition from non-incumbent transmission developers and also created opportunities for us to compete for transmission projects outside of our current geographic footprint.

Innovation and technology

Performance improvements and cost declines have led to continued growth in new technologies

Distributed generation of solar power has grown significantly due to price declines and tax incentives. Energy storage is growing in the US as certain states set goals and other utilities announce investment plans for storage capacity.

The UK hit a record high for wind generation in 2014 of 28 terawatt hours (TWh), 15% greater than the previous year.

Plug-in electric vehicle sales in the US and worldwide grew, even as gasoline prices dropped throughout the past year.

Further investment in electricity distribution networks may be necessary to integrate these new technologies

Investment in renewable energy continues to grow. Regulatory proceedings are underway to enhance the value of distributed resources to the grid and give customers more control over their energy use.

These could require significant network investment in order to integrate new and variable resources and provide customers with more information on their usage.

LOGO

 NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16 07Our operating environment
09


Strategic Report

What we do – Electricity

The electricity industry connects generation sources to homes and businesses through transmission and distribution networks. Companies that pay to use transmission networks buy electricity from generators and sell it to consumers.

 

LOGO

What we do

Electricity The electricity industry connects generation sources to homes and businesses through transmission and distribution networks. Companies that pay to use transmission networks buy electricity from generators and sell it to consumers.

In focus

Our business model

pages 14–15

 

Real-time balancing

Through our Electricity Network Control Centre we balance the UK’s energy needs in real time. Read more about this on pages 34–35.

LOGOLOGO

Generation

Generation is the production of electricity from fossil fuel and nuclear power stations, as well as renewable sources such as wind and solar. In the US, we own and operate 50 fossil fuel-powered stations on Long Island and 7.9 MW of solar generation in Massachusetts. We do not own or operate any electricity generation in the UK.

We sell the electricity generated by our plants on Long Island to LIPA under a long-term power supply agreement. The contract allows us to recover our efficient operating costs and provides a return on equity on our investment in the generation assets.

For solar generation, we recover our costs and a reasonable return from customers in Massachusetts through a solar cost-adjustment factor. This is added to the electricity rate, net of revenues earned from the solar assets.

Transmission

Transmission systems generally include overhead lines, underground cables and substations. They connect generation and interconnectors to the distribution system.

We own and operate the transmission network in England and Wales. We operate but do not own the Scottish networks. We are also working in a joint venture with Scottish Power Transmission to construct an interconnector to reinforce the GB transmission system between Scotland and England and Wales.

In the US, we jointly own and operate transmission facilities spanning upstate New York, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island and Vermont.

LOGO

Distribution

Distribution systems carry lower voltages than transmission systems over networks of overhead lines, underground cables and substations. They take over the role of transporting electricity from the transmission network, and deliver it to consumers at a voltage they can use.

We do not own or operate electricity distribution networks in the UK.

In the US, our distribution networks serve around 3.5 million customers in upstate New York, Massachusetts and Rhode Island.

LOGO

Supply

The supply of electricity involves buying electricity and selling it on to customers. It also involves customer services, billing and the collection of customer accounts.

We do not sell electricity to consumers in the UK.

All our customers in the US can select a competitive supplier for the supply component of electricity utility services. Where customers choose National Grid, they pay us for distribution and electricity costs. Where they choose to buy electricity from third parties, they pay us for distribution only and pay the third-party supplier for the electricity. Our base charges for electricity supply are calculated to recover the purchased power costs.

LOGO
Interconnectors

 

System operator

As system operator (SO) for England and Wales, we coordinate and direct electricity flows onto and over the transmission system, balancing generation supply and user demand. Where necessary, we pay sources of supply and demand to increase or decrease their generation or usage.

 

We have the same role for the two high voltage electricity transmission networks in Scotland and we are SO for the offshore electricity transmission regime.

 

Our charges for SO services in the UK are subject to a price control approved by Ofgem. System users pay us for connection, for using the system and balancing services.

 

As electricity transmission SO, our price control includes incentives to minimise the costs and associated risks of balancing the system through buying and selling energy, as well as procuring balancing services from industry participants.

 

In the US, similar services are provided by independent system operators.

will deliver significant benefits to consumers. These include opportunities for interconnection with Iceland, Denmark and a further link with France.

  

LOGO

We also jointly own and operate a 224 kilometre interconnector between New England in the US and Canada.

We sell capacity on our UK interconnectors through auctions and on our US interconnector through wholesale markets and bilateral contracts.

LOGO

Transmission systems generally include overhead lines, underground cables and substations. They connect generation and interconnectors to the distribution system.

We own and operate the transmission network in England and Wales. We operate but do not own the Scottish networks. We are also working in a joint venture with Scottish Power Transmission to construct an interconnector to reinforce the GB transmission system between Scotland and England and Wales.

LOGO

Generation is the production of electricity from fossil fuel and nuclear power stations, as well as renewable sources such as wind and solar. In the US, we own and operate 50 fossil fuel-powered stations on Long Island and 4.6 MW of solar generation in Massachusetts. We do not own or operate any electricity generation in the UK.

We sell the electricity generated by our plants on Long Island to LIPA under a long-term power supply agreement. The contract allows us to recover our efficient operating costs and provides a return on equity on our investment in the generation assets.

For solar generation, we recover our costs and a reasonable return from customers in Massachusetts through a solar cost adjustment factor. This is added to the electricity rate, net of revenues earned from the solar assets.

LOGO

Transmission grids are often interconnected so that energy can flow from one country or region to another. This helps provide a safe, secure, reliable and affordable energy supply for citizens and society across the region. Interconnectors also allow power suppliers to sell their energy to customers in other countries.

 

Great Britain is linked via interconnectors with France, Ireland, Northern Ireland and Thethe Netherlands. National Grid ownsWe own part of the interconnectors with France and Thethe Netherlands. We are also now entering the construction phase for two new interconnectors, between the UK and Belgium and the UK and Norway. We are continuing to work on developing additional interconnector projects, which we believe will deliver significant benefits to consumers. These include opportunities for interconnection with Iceland, Denmark and a further link with France.

 

In the US, weWe also jointly own and operate transmission facilities spanning upstatea 224 kilometre interconnector between New York, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode IslandEngland in the US and Vermont.

LOGO

Distribution systems carry lower voltages than transmission systems over networks of overhead lines, underground cables and substations. They take over the role of transporting electricity from the transmission network, and deliver it to consumers at a voltage they can use.Canada.

 

We do not own or operate electricity distribution networks in the UK.

In thesell capacity on our UK interconnectors through auctions and on our US our distribution networks serve around 3.5 million customers in upstate New York, Massachusettsinterconnector through wholesale markets and Rhode Island.

LOGO

The supply of electricity involves buying electricity and selling it on to customers. It also involves customer services, billing and the collection of customer accounts.

We do not sell electricity to consumers in the UK.

All our customers in the US can select a competitive supplier for the supply component of electricity utility services. Where customers choose National Grid, they pay us for distribution and electricity costs. Where they choose to buy electricity from third parties, they pay us for distribution only and pay the third-party supplier for the electricity. Our base charges for electricity supply are calculated to recover the purchased power costs.bilateral contracts.

  

LOGO

 

       0810National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Strategic Report 


LOGO

Strategic Report
3.8 GW
Generation produced in the US
1 Generation
260 km
Approximate length of BritNed interconnector
2 Interconnectors
3 Transmission
99.99999%
Electricity transmission reliability in England and Wales
30 TWh
Approximate amount of electricity we forecast, plan for and procure annually across three states in the US
4 Distribution
3.5 million
US electricity customers
ELECTRICITY
5 Supply
NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15 09


LOGO

Strategic Report
4 Supply
3.6 million
US gas customers
7,660 km
of high pressure pipeline in the UK
3 Distribution
2 Transmission
26,882
New gas heating customers in the US
10.9 million
Customers serviced in the UK
1 Production and importation
14.9%
Approximate percentage of UK gas from LNG imports
10


 

   Strategic Report

LOGO

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16What we do – Electricity11


LOGO

12National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Strategic Report


 

What we do – Gas   Strategic Report

 

In focus

What we do

Our business model

pages 14–15

 

GasThe gas industry connects producers, processors, storage, transmission

and distribution network operators, as well as suppliers to industrial,

commercial and domestic users.

 

System operatorBiomethane milestone

As system operator we are responsible forWe connected the high pressure gas National Transmission System (NTS)UK’s first 100% renewable biomethane HGV filling station in Great Britain. We have responsibility for the residual balancing activities on the NTS and for keeping the physical system within safe operating limits.Leyland, Lancashire

(see page 37).

 

Our price control, set by Ofgem, includes incentives that aim to maintain and improve our daily operational efficiency and are subject to renegotiation at set intervals.LOGO

 

   
LOGOLOGO
Production and importationDistribution

We do not produce gas in either the UK or the US. Gas used in the UK is mainly sourced from gas fields in the North and Irish seas, piped from Europe and imported as LNG.

 

There are seven gas reception terminals, three LNG importation terminals and three interconnectors connecting Great Britain via undersea pipes with Ireland, Belgium and the Netherlands. Importers bring LNG from the Middle East, the Americas and other places.

Gas used in the US is produced mainly in North America. We areimport LNG from a number of countries.

In the sole ownerUK, we own and operatoroperate Grain LNG, an importation terminal and storage facility at the Isle of gas transmission infrastructureGrain in Great Britain.Kent, which charges customers under long-term contracts for various services. These include access to our importation terminal, storage facilities and capacity rights.

 

In the US, we holdown and operate LNG storage and vaporisation facilities, as well as an LNG storage facility in Providence, Rhode Island, where we store gas for third parties for a minority interest in two interstate pipelines: Millennium Pipeline Companyfee. We also buy gas directly from producers and Iroquois Gas Transmission System. Interstate pipelines are regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC).LNG importers for resale to our customers.

 

LOGO

In the UK, gas leaves the transmission system and enters the distribution networks at high pressure. It is then transported through a number of reducing pressure tiers until it is finally delivered to consumers.

 

There are eight regional gas distribution networks in the UK, four of which are owned by National Grid. In the US, gas is delivered by the interstate pipeline companies to local distribution networks. Each local distribution company has a geographically defined service territory and is the only local distribution company within that territory. Local distribution companies are regulated by the relevant local state’s utility commission.

 

Our networks deliver gas to 10.9 million consumers in the UK and 3.6 million customers in the US.

 

LOGOLOGO

Supply

Pipeline shippers bring gas from producers to suppliers, who in turn sell it to customers.

 

We do not supply gas in the UK. However, we own National Grid Metering, which provides meters and metering services to supply companies, under contract.

 

In the UK, customers pay the supplier for the cost of gas and for its transportation. We transport the gas through our network on behalf of shippers, who pay us transportation charges.

 

In the US, gas distribution companies, including National Grid, sell gas to consumers connected to their distribution systems.

 

In most cases in the US, where customers choose National Grid, they pay us for distribution and gas costs. Where they choose to buy gas from third parties, they pay us for distribution only and pay the third-party supplier for the gas and upstream transportation capacity.

 

Also in the US, except for residential consumers in Rhode Island, customers may purchase their supply from independent providers with the option of billing for those purchases to be provided by us.

   

LOGO

LOGO
  Transmission

 

LOGO

 

Gas used

System operator

As SO we are responsible for the high pressure gas NTS in Great Britain. We have responsibility for the UK is mainly sourced from gas fields inresidual balancing activities on the NorthNTS and Irish seas, piped from Europe and imported as LNG.for keeping the physical system within safe operating limits.

 

ThereOur price control, set by Ofgem, includes incentives that aim to maintain and improve our daily operational efficiency and are seven gas reception terminals, three LNG importation terminals and three interconnectors connecting Great Britain via undersea pipes with Ireland, Belgium and the Netherlands. Importers bring LNG from the Middle East, the Americas and other places.

Gas used in the US is produced mainly in North America. We import LNG from a number of countries.

We do not produce gas in either the UK or US.

In the UK, we own and operate Grain LNG, an importation terminal and storage facilitysubject to renegotiation at the Isle of Grain in Kent, which charges customers under long-term contracts for various services. These include access to our importation terminal, storage facilities and capacity rights.set intervals.

In the US, we own and operate LNG storage and vaporisation facilities, as well as an LNG storage facility in Providence, Rhode Island, where we store gas for third parties for a fee. We also buy gas directly from producers and LNG importers for resale to our customers.

LOGO

The transmission systems generally include pipes, compressor stations and storage facilities, including LNG storage. They connect production through terminals to the distribution systems.

 

In the UK, gas enters the transmission system through importation and reception terminals and interconnectors and may include gas previously held in storage.

Compressor stations located along the network play a vital role in keeping large quantities of gas flowing through the system, particularly at times of high demand.

 

The gas transmission system has to be kept constantly in balance, which is achieved by buying, selling and using stored gas. This means that, under normal circumstances, demand can be met.

We are the sole owner and operator of gas transmission infrastructure in Great Britain. In the US, we hold a minority interest in two interstate pipelines: Millennium Pipeline Company and Iroquois Gas Transmission System. Interstate pipelines are regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC).

  
LOGO

LOGO

 

          NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/1511

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16

What we do – Gas13


LOGO

14National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Strategic Report


 

Strategic Report

 

Our business model

How we generate long-term value.

 

 

 

LOGO

 

LOGO

LOGO

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16
Our business model15


Our vision and strategy

 

Our vision is to connect you to your energy today,

trusted to meet your energy needs tomorrow.

Our strategy is to be a recognised leader in the development and operation of safe, reliable and sustainable energy infrastructure, to meet the needs of our customers and communities and to generate value for our investors.

Our strategic objectives set out what we believe we need to do to achieve our vision and strategy. Further information on all our KPIs is provided on pages 18–21.

  12


 

 

 

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

    NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/1513                                


Strategic Report

Our vision and strategy

Our vision describes our intentions and aspirations at the highest level. Our strategic objectives set out what we believe we need to achieve to deliver our vision and be recognised as a leader in the development and operation of safe, reliable and resilient energy infrastructure.

 

Strategic objectiveDeliver operational excellence

Engage

our people

Stimulate

innovation

  

 

Strategic objectiveLOGO

 

LOGO

LOGO

Description

 

 

DescriptionAchieve world-class levels

of safety, reliability, security

and customer service.

  

 

How we deliverCreate an inclusive,

high-performance

culture by developing

all our employees.

  

Promote new ideas to

work more efficiently

and effectively.

 

Deliver
operational
excellence
How we deliver

LOGO

Achieve world-class levels of safety, reliability, security and customer service.

 

 

Our customers, communities and other stakeholders demand safe, reliable and secure supply of their energy. This is reflected in our regulatory contracts where we are measured and rewarded on the basis of meeting our commitments to customers and other stakeholders.

 

Pursuing excellence in all our operational processes will allow us to manage our assets efficiently, deliver network improvements quickly and provide services that meet the changing demands of our customers.

Engage
our people

LOGO

Create an inclusive, high-performance culture by developing all our employees.

   

 

It is through the hard work of our employees that we will achieve our vision, respond to the needs of our stakeholders and create a competitive advantage. Encouraging engaged and talented teams that are in step with our strategic objectives is vital to our success.

 

Our presence within the communities we serve, the people we work with and our opportunities to grow both individually and as a business are all important to making National Grid a great place to work.

 

 

Stimulate
innovation

LOGO

Promote new ideas to work more efficiently and effectively.

   

 

Our commitment to innovation allows us to run our networks more efficiently and effectively and achieve our regulatory incentives. Across our business, we explore new ways of thinking and working to benefit every aspect of what we do.

 

Embedding innovation and new technology into our operations helps us deliver continuous improvements in the quality and cost of our services.

 

Relevant KPIs

 

Employee injury frequency rate

Employee engagement index

Network reliability

  

Number of employee lost time injuries per 100,000 hours worked in a 12 month period. Our ambition is to achieve a world-class safety performance of below 0.1.

Network reliability

The reliability of our electricity and gas networks.

Customer satisfaction

A measure of customer satisfaction across our segments and differing customer groups.

Group return on equity

Measure of value generation for our shareholders.

A measure of how engaged our employees feel, based on the percentage of favourable responses to certain indicator questions repeated annually in our employee engagement survey.

Workforce diversity

Percentage of women and ethnic minorities in our workforce.

The reliability of our electricity and gas networks.

16National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Strategic Report


 

Engage
externally
   Strategic Report

 

LOGO

 

Strategic objective

Engage

externally

Embed

sustainability

Drive

growth

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

Description

 

 

Work with external stakeholders to shape UK, EU and US energy policy.

  

Integrate sustainability into our decision-making to create value, help preserve natural resources and respect the interests of our communities.

Grow our core businesses and develop future new business options.

How we deliver

 

 

Policy decisions by regulators, governments and others directly affect our business. We engage widely in the energy policy debate, so our position and perspective can influence future policy direction. We also engage with our regulators to help them provide the right mechanisms so we can deliver infrastructure that meets the changing needs of our customers and stakeholders.

 

Embed
sustainability

LOGO

Integrate sustainability into our decision making to create value, preserve natural resources and respect the interests of our communities.

 

 

Our long-term sustainability strategy sets our ambition to deliver these aims and to embed a culture of sustainability within our organisation.

 

ThatThis culture will allowallows us to make decisions that balance affordability with helping to protect and preserve natural resources and benefit the communities in which we operate. We remain committed to our targets of a 45% reduction in Scope 1 and Scope 2 greenhouse gas emissions by 2020 and 80% by 2050.

 

Drive growth

LOGO

Grow our core businesses and develop future new business options.

 

 

We continue to maximise value from our existing portfolio, while exploring and evaluating opportunities for growth. Making sure our portfolio of businesses maintains the appropriate mix of growth and cash generation is necessary to meet the expectations of our shareholders.

 

We review investment opportunities carefully and will only invest where we can reasonably expect to earn acceptable returns.

 

Combining this disciplined approach with operational and procurement efficiencies gives us the best possible opportunity to drive strong returns and meet our commitments to investors.

 

Relevant KPIs

  

     14 


 

 

Climate change

A measure of our reduction of Scope 1 and Scope 2 greenhouse gas emissions of the six primary Kyoto greenhouse gases (excluding electricity transmission and distribution line losses).

 

 

Regulated asset base growth

Maintaining efficient growth in our regulated assets ensures we are well positioned to provide consistently high levels of service to our customers and increases our revenue allowances in future years.

 

Relevant KPIs

  Our vision

   Employee IFR

   Network reliability

   Customer satisfaction

LOGO See pages 16–19

Connecting you to your
energy today, trusted to
help you meet your energy
needs tomorrow.

How our strategy creates value

Our vision and strategic objectives explain what is important to us, so we can meet our commitments and deliver value.

   Employee engagement index

   Workforce diversity

LOGO See pages 18–19

   Value added

   Network reliability

LOGO See pages 16–19

  

CustomerAdjusted EPS

Adjusted earnings represent profit for the year attributable to equity shareholders. This excludes exceptional items and community value

Safety and reliability – we strive to provide reliable networks safely, which is essential to safeguard our customers, employees and the communities in which we operate.

Affordability – we strive to provide services efficiently, which helps to reduce the amount of money consumers have to pay for their energy.

Customer service – providing essential services that meet the needs of our customers and communities is a crucial part of the value they expect from us.

Sustainability – we strive to protect the environment and preserve resources for current and future generations.

Emergency services – we provide telephone call centres, coordinate the response to gas emergencies, and respond to severe weather events.

Community engagement – we listen to the communities we serve and work hard to address concerns about the development of our networks. Our employees volunteer for community-based projects and we support educational initiatives in schools.

Shareholder value

Regulatory frameworks – operating within sound regulatory frameworks provides stability. Making sure these frameworks maintain a balance between risk and return underpins our investment proposition.

Reputation – our approach to safety and our reliability record underpin our reputation. These are crucial factors that contribute towards positive regulatory discussions and help us pursue new business opportunities.

Efficient operations – efficient capital and operational expenditure allows us to deliver network services at a lower cost and reduces working capital requirements.

Maximising incentives – if we perform well against our incentives, and deliver the outputs our customers and regulatory stakeholders require, we can make the most of our allowed returns.

Funding and cash flow management – securing low-cost funding and carefully managing our cash flows help us maintain strong returns for our investors.

Disciplined investment – we can increase our revenue and earnings by investing in both regulated and non-regulated assets. This helps us deliver attractive returns for our shareholders.

remeasurements (see page 111).

   Customer satisfaction

LOGO See pages 18–19

        
 

   Greenhouse gas emissionsAdjusted earnings per share provides a measure of shareholder return that is comparable over time.

 

LOGO See pages 18–19

   Regulated asset growth

   Adjusted EPS

LOGO See pages 16–17

��

 

LOGO

 NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16 15Our vision and strategy
17


Strategic ReportOur KPIs

Delivering our strategy – key performance indicators

The Board uses a range of financial and non-financial metrics, reported periodically, against which we measure Group performance.

Delivering our strategy The Board uses a range of financial and non-financial metrics, reported periodically, against which we measure Group performance.

 

 

 

 

KPI and definition

Our performance

 

 

Adjusted EPS

 

Adjusted earnings represent profit for the year attributable to equity shareholders. This excludes exceptional items and remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries (see pages 103 and 104)page 111).

 

Adjusted earnings per share provides a measure of shareholder return that is comparable over time.

   

 

Adjusted EPS pence1Group return

LOGO

1.  Comparative amounts have been restated to reflect the impact of additional shares issued as scrip dividends.

Group return on equity (RoE)

 

We measure our performance in generating value for our shareholders by dividing our annual return by our equity base.

 

This calculation provides a measure of the performance of the whole Group compared with the amounts invested by the Group in assets attributable to equity shareholders.

 

   

 

Group return on equity %Regulated asset

LOGO

Regulated assetbase growth

 

Maintaining efficient growth in our regulated assets ensures we are well positioned to provide consistently high levels of service to our customers and increases our revenue allowances in future years.

 

Our performance

 

 

Adjusted EPSpence1

Group return on equity %

Total regulated assetsasset base and regulated asset base growth £bn

LOGO

1.  US base rate calculated as at 31 December 2010 in this year.

2.  Estimated figure until the conclusion of the regulatory reporting cycle.£bn

 

  

 

Value addedLOGO

 

Reflects value to shareholders of dividend and growth in National Grid’s assets, net of the growth in overall debt.

  

LOGO

   

 

Value added £bn

LOGOLOGO

 

 

Employee lost time injury frequency rateCommentary

Number of employee lost time injuries per 100,000 hours worked in a 12 month period.

Our ambition is to achieve a world-class safety performance of below 0.1.

Employee lost time injury frequency rate per 100,000 hours worked

LOGO

     16


We are adding new KPIs to better reflect the issues that matter most to our Company and our stakeholders. For this 2014/15 Report, we have included information about workforce diversity, as set out on pages 18 and 19. We aim to include two further new KPIs in our 2015/16 Report. These relate to community engagement and investment in education, skills and capabilities. Executive remuneration is linked to some of our KPIs.

Commentary

Target
 

 

For the year ended 31 March 2015,2016, adjusted earnings attributable to equity shareholders increased by £174£197 million to £2,189£2,386 million. This increase in earnings resulted in an adjusted earnings per share of 58.1 pence,63.5p, an increase of 9%10.2% on 2013/14.2014/15.

 

The earnings increase was driven by a £199£233 million increase in adjusted operating profit. With the exception of our UK Gas DistributionElectricity Transmission business, we saw increases in adjusted operating profit acrossincreased in all of our business segments.

 

Overall adjusted net finance costs reduced by £75were £20 million acrosslower than 2014/15 at £1,013 million. The effective tax rate for the Group whichyear was broadly offset by a higher adjusted tax charge of £114 million reflecting the increase in profits across the Group.24.0%.

 

LOGO  See

Group RoE has increased during the year to 12.3%, from 11.8% in 2014/15. During the year, the UK regulated businesses delivered a solid return of 13.3% in aggregate (2014/15: 13.7%), including an assumption of 3% long run average RPI inflation. US returns (calculated on a calendar year) of 8.0% were slightly down on last year, reflecting high winter gas leak and snow removal costs at the start of 2015, together with rate base growth.

Further details of how this is calculated are on page 20202.

Our UK regulated asset value (RAV) and US rate base increased by £1.8 billion (5%) to £38.8 billion. This reflects the continued high levels of investment in our networks in both the UK and US, together with the impact of the stronger US dollar.

Target

 

 

The adjusted EPS target set as part of executive remuneration for APPAnnual Performance Plan (‘APP’) was more than met with 100% of maximum achieved (see page 70)76).

Group RoE has increased during the year to 11.8%, from 11.4% in 2013/14.

The UK regulated businesses delivered good returns of 13.7% in aggregate in the second year of their new price controls, including the assumed 3% long run average RPI inflation.

 

US returns of 8.4% were slightly down on last year, reflecting the additional costs incurred on gas leak repair and compliance and the increased level of rate base growth since 2013.

LOGO  See page 21

 

 

The Group RoE target set as part of executive remuneration for APP was more than met with 100% of maximum achieved (see page 70)76).

Our regulated assets have increased by 7% (£2.3 billion) to £37.0 billion. This reflects the continued high levels of investment in our networks in both the UK and US, together with the impact of the stronger US dollar.

 

The rateGroup RoE is one of growth at constant currency was 3%.the performance measures for the Long Term Performance Plan, outturns for which are calculated on a three year basis.

 

The UK regulatory asset value (RAV) increased by £0.5 billion, reflecting significant capital expenditure, together with inflation, although at 0.9% RPI, this has had a smaller impact than in recent years. US rate base has increased by £1.8 billion this year. Of this, £1.2 billion was due to foreign exchange movements increasing the rate base reported in sterling. Excluding foreign exchange, rate base increased by £0.6 billion, reflecting a record year of US investment.

LOGO  See page 21

 

 

No specific target. Our overall aim is to increaseachieve between 5% and 7% of regulated asset base growth above the underlying rate of inflation.

Value added in the year was lower than 2013/14, primarily due to the impact of lower RPI on UK regulated asset growth. RPI inflation for March 2015 was 0.9% compared with 2.5% in March 2014 and National Grid’s long run assumption of 3%.

Of the £1.7 billion value added in 2014/15, £1,271 million was paid to shareholders as cash dividends and £335 million as share repurchases (offsetting the scrip issuance during the year), with £79 million retained in the business.

LOGO  See page 21

No specific target. Our overall aim is to sustainably grow value added over the long term while maintaining performance of our other financial KPIs.

In the UK we maintained a world-class employee safety performance during 2014/15, with an employee injury frequency rate of 0.09. Our US business improved its safety performance, with an employee injury frequency rate of 0.15.

Overall, our Company-wide injury frequency rate of 0.13 is better than last year and means that we bettered our target of 0.15. However, we did not meet our ambition to reach a world-class level by 2015.

LOGO  See UK Principal operations: pages 27–31

       and US Principal operations: pages 33–35

We achieved our Company-wide employee IFR target of 0.15.each year.

LOGO

NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/1517


Strategic Report

Delivering our strategy – key performance indicatorscontinued

  

 

KPI and definition

 

   

 

Our performance

 

   

 

   Network reliability

           Performance      Measure  Target   
            10/11  11/12  12/13  13/14  14/15     14/15  
     

 

 
 

The reliability of our electricity and gas networks.

UK Electricity

Transmission

99.999999.99999999.9999999.9999999.99999%99.9999
    

 

 

UK Gas

Transmission

100100100100100%100
    

 

 

UK Gas

Distribution

99.99999.99999.99999.99999.999%99.999
     

 

 
 

Electricity

transmission – US

99.96999.96099.95899.95799.942%
    

 

 

Electricity

distribution – US

99.99799.97799.98099.98099.969%1
    

 

 
   

 

1. Targets are set individually by each of our US jurisdictions.

 

 
  

 

   Customer satisfaction

   Performance  

Measure

Target 
      10/1111/1212/1313/1414/15 14/15 
     

 

 
 

We measure customer satisfaction in the UK using RIIO related metrics agreed with Ofgem. In the US, we use J.D. Power and Associates customer satisfaction surveys.

UK Electricity

Transmission

n/an/an/a7.47.4Score out of 106.91
    

 

 

UK Gas

Transmission

n/an/an/a7.27.6Score out of 106.91
    

 

 

UK Gas

Distribution

n/an/an/a8.22Score out of 108.31
    

 

 

US Gas distribution

– Residential

2nd3rd3rd2nd4thQuartile ranking

To

improve

     

 

 
 

US Gas distribution

– Commercial

4th3rd4th4th4thQuartile ranking

To

improve

    

 

 

US Electricity

– Residential

3rd3rd3rd2nd3rdQuartile ranking

To

improve

    

 

 

US Electricity

– Commercial

2nd2nd3rd2nd2ndQuartile ranking

To

improve

     

 

 
 

 

1. Figures represent our baseline targets set by Ofgem for reward or penalty under RIIO.

    

2. Under RIIO-GD1, our customer satisfaction results are now reported on an annual basis, rather than quarterly, which was how we reported them under our previous price control. We will publish the results on our website in the summer as part of our commitment to our stakeholders, and in our Annual Report and Accounts for 2015/16.

 

 
  

 

   Employee engagement index

  Employee engagement index % 
 

 

A measure of how engaged our employees feel, based on the percentage of favourable responses to certain indicator questions repeated annually in our employee opinion survey.

  

 

LOGO

 

 
  

 

   Greenhouse gas emissions

  Greenhouse gas emissions million tonnes carbon dioxide equivalent 
 

 

Scope 1 and Scope 2 greenhouse gas emissions of the six primary Kyoto greenhouse gases (excluding electricity transmission and distribution line losses). Our target is to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions by 45% by 2020 and 80% by 2050, compared with our 1990 emissions of 19.6 million tonnes.

 

  

 

LOGO

 

 
  

 

   Workforce diversity

  Workforce diversity % 
 

 

Percentage of women and ethnic minorities in our workforce.

  

LOGO

 

 

      18


 

18National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Strategic Report


Commentary

Target

 

 

We aim to deliver reliability by: planning our capital investments to meet challenging demand and supply patterns; designing and building robust networks; risk-based maintenance and replacement programmes; and detailed and tested incident response plans. In the UK, our networks performed well. Despite tighter winter margins than previous years, we were able to operate the system without calling upon our additional reserve.

In the US, despite low temperatures and record levels of snowfall in parts of New England our network resilience held up well. We invested millions of dollars in both our electricity and gas infrastructure to improve resilience and help reduce the impact of service interruptions.

LOGO See UK Principal operations: pages 27–31   Strategic Report

       and US Principal operations: pages 32–35

 

We achieved our targets, which are set out in the table for our UK networks, and are set individually for each of our US jurisdictions.

Our customer satisfaction KPI comprises seven components: Ofgem’s UK electricity transmission, gas transmission and gas distribution customer satisfaction scores; and four J.D. Power and Associates customer satisfaction surveys in the US.

We have exceeded the two UK electricity and gas transmission targets; the outcome for the third UK KPI component will be published later this year (see note opposite).

In the US, we did not achieve our targets. Customers were concerned about higher-than-normal winter bills as a result of electricity commodity price increases and higher gas usage due to cold weather. In an effort to rebuild trust and customer satisfaction, we put in place a customer outreach and education programme that focused on energy saving solutions and bill management.

LOGO See UK Principal operations: pages 27–31

       and US Principal operations: pages 32–35

Our targets for each business area are set out in the table. We achieved our UK transmission targets, but did not achieve our US targets.

We measure employee engagement through our employee opinion survey. The results of our 2015 survey, which was completed by 83% of our employees, have helped us identify specific areas where we are performing well and those areas we need to improve. Our engagement index has risen by four points to 75%, our highest engagement score since we started conducting Group-wide employee opinion surveys. Managers receive a scorecard that aims to

create greater leadership accountability and we produce survey reports and action plans at Company, regional, business unit, function and team levels.

LOGO  See Our people: pages 24–25

We achieved our target of increasing engagement compared with the previous year.

Our Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions (excluding electricity transmission and distribution line losses) for 2014/15 equate to 7.3 million tonnes carbon dioxide equivalent; a 63% reduction against our 1990 baseline. These emissions are equivalent to an intensity of around 478 tonnes per £million of revenue.

We measure and report our greenhouse gas emissions in accordance with the World Resources Institute and World Business Council on Sustainable Development

Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (Revised Edition) for all six Kyoto gases, using the operational approach for emissions accounting. Those Scope 1 and 2 emissions are independently assured against the international standard ISO 14064-3 Greenhouse Gas assurance protocol. A copy of this statement of assurance is available on our website.

Our target, described on the facing page, is in progress.

During 2014/15, the percentage of both women and ethnic minorities in our workforce increased slightly. For more details about the breakdown by gender at different levels of the organisation, as well as information relating to subsidiary directors, see page 25. During 2014/15 we were recognised as a Times Top 50 Employer for Women for 2015 and reached the Gold level in our benchmarking with both Race for

Opportunity and Opportunity Now. In the UK and US, our Employee Resource Groups continue to support our business goals and inclusion and diversity initiatives.

LOGO  See Our people: pages 24–25

No specific target set. We aim to develop and operate a business that has an inclusive and diverse culture.

 

LOGO

Value added

 

Reflects value to shareholders of dividend and growth in National Grid’s assets, net of the growth in overall debt.

   

Employee lost time injury frequency rate

 

Number of employee lost time injuries per 100,000 hours worked in a 12-month period. Our ambition is to achieve a world-class safety performance of below 0.1.

   

Network reliability

 

The reliability of our electricity and gas networks.

 

Network reliability is measured separately for each of our business areas. The table below is meant to provide a simple visual representation of our performance across all of our networks.

 

Detailed data for each of the prior four years is provided on page 18 of our 2014/15 Annual Report and Accounts, which you can find in the investors section of our Company website.

 

 

Value added£bn

  

 

Employee lost time injury frequency rate

per 100,000 hours worked

      Prior four  
        years  
      Target/  (11/12–  

LOGO

  

 

 

 

 

LOGO

      base% 15/16 14/15)  
    UK Electricity Transmission T 99.9999 99.999998 exceeded  
    UK Gas Transmission T 100 100 achieved  
    UK Gas Distribution T 99.999 99.999 achieved  
    US Electricity Transmission B 99.9 99.972 no target  
    US Electricity Distribution B 99.9 99.995 no target  
    

 

Key:

    

T –  Target

    

B –  No target set or set individually by each jurisdiction.

       Accordingly, we set a base and report performance above the base.

    
       

 

Value added in the year increased by £0.1 billion to £1.8 billion.

 

Of the £1.8 billion value added in 2015/16, £1,337 million was paid to shareholders as cash dividends and £267 million as share repurchases (offsetting the scrip issuance during the year), with £183 million retained in the business.

 

See page 23 for further details.

   

 

In the UK we improved our employee safety performance during 2015/16, with an employee injury frequency rate of 0.07. Our US business improved its safety performance, with an employee injury frequency rate of 0.11.

 

Overall, our Company-wide employee injury frequency rate has fallen to 0.10 and has been consistently around this level throughout the year. In real terms, this means 17 fewer employees had a lost time injury this year than last.

   

 

We aim to deliver reliability by: planning our capital investments to meet challenging demand and supply patterns; designing and building robust networks; risk-based maintenance and replacement programmes; and detailed and tested incident response plans. In the UK, our networks performed well. Ahead of winter 2015/16, we assessed the margin and procured additional electricity system balancing tools on both supply and demand-side. We successfully used our new demand side tool for the first time and saw the market respond to market notifications. In the US, despite numerous winter snow storms and summer wind storms in parts of New England and New York, our network resilience held up well. We invested millions of dollars in our electricity infrastructure to improve resilience and help reduce the impact of service interruptions.

 

See UK Principal operations: pages 31–37

and US Principal operations: pages 38–41

 

 

 

 

No specific target. Our overall aim is to sustainably grow value added over the long term while maintaining performance of our other financial KPIs.

 

 

   

 

We have met our ambition of achieving below 0.1 in the UK but not in the US.

   

 

We achieved our targets, which are set out in the table for our UK networks, and are set individually for each of our US jurisdictions.

 

 NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16 Our KPIs19


Our KPIscontinued

Strategic ReportDelivering our strategy

Financial review

We have delivered another year The Board uses a range of strong financial performance in the UK and solid performance in the US with record investment levels.non-financial metrics, reported periodically, against which we measure Group performance.  

 

 

 

KPI and definitionSkills and capabilitiesWorkforce diversity

Community engagement and investment in education

We support developing the skills and capabilities of young people through skills-sharing employee volunteering, especially in the STEM subjects, because it supports our future talent recruitment and our desire to see young people gain meaningful employment.

Percentage of women and ethnic minorities in our workforce.Working with our communities is important in creating shared value for us as a business and the people we serve. We use the London Benchmarking Group (LBG) measurement framework to provide an overall community investment figure which includes education.

Our performance

Skills and capabilities

LOGO   

Workforce diversity%

LOGO   

Community engagement and investment in education£

LOGO     

CommentaryWe measure quality (>1 hour) interactions with young people on STEM subjects. In the UK we have had 9,733 interactions with young people on STEM subjects, and 8,675 interactions in the US.

We continue to closely track the demographics of our employee population in terms of gender and ethnicity.

To find out more about how we promote an inclusive and diverse workforce go to page 44.

In the UK our community engagement and investment in education is £7,984,720, and in the US it is £6,566,647 and £3,073 in other countries. This is a financial measurement of a number of activities including the time our employees give through volunteering, the money our employees raise through fundraising and also the support we give to our charity partners. Overall our Company-wide investment is £14,554,440.

TargetNo specific target. Our overall aim is to encourage young people to get involved in the STEM subjects.No specific target. We aim to develop and operate a business that has an inclusive and diverse culture.

We do not have a specific target on how much we invest in this area; our overall aim is to make sure we are creating shared value for the communities that we serve and work in.

20National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Strategic Report


   Strategic Report

 

Employee engagement index

 

  Climate change  Customer satisfaction
A measure of how engaged our employees feel, based on the percentage of favourable responses to certain indicator questions repeated annually in our employee engagement survey.  

Scope 1 and Scope 2 greenhouse gas emissions of the six primary Kyoto greenhouse gases (excluding electricity transmission and distribution line losses). Our target is to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions by 45% by 2020 and 80% by 2050, compared with our 1990 emissions of 19.6 million tonnes.

  

The table summarises how we measure customer satisfaction:

 

         Methodology        Measure
    UK UseRIIO-related metrics agreed with Ofgem     Score out of 10
    US J.D. Power and Associates customer satisfaction surveys     Quartile ranking
       

 

The table below focuses on the past two years.
Detailed data for the prior four years is provided on
page 18 of our 2014/15 Annual Report and
Accounts, which you can find in the investors section
of our Company website.

 

 

Employee engagement index%   

Greenhouse gas emissions

Million tonnes carbon dioxide equivalent

        Performance   
              14/15  15/16  Target  
    UK Electricity Transmission   7.4    7.5   6.91  

 

LOGO

  

 

LOGO

  UK Gas Transmission   7.6    7.6   6.91  
    UK Gas Distribution   8.3    2   8.31  
    US Gas Distribution – Residential   4th    4th   To improve  
    US Gas Distribution – Commercial   4th    3rd   To improve  
    US Electricity – Residential   3rd    3rd   To improve  
    US Electricity – Commercial   2nd    4th   To improve  
    

 

1. Figures represent our baseline targets set by Ofgem for reward or penalty under RIIO.

2. Our customer satisfaction results are now reported on an annual basis with the results being published later this year.

 

 

We measure employee engagement through our employee engagement survey. The results of our 2016 survey, which was completed by 87% of our employees, have helped us identify specific areas where we are performing well and those areas we need to improve. Our engagement index has risen one point to 76% favourable. Managers receive a scorecard that aims to create greater leadership accountability and we produce survey reports and action plans at company, regional, business unit, function and team levels.  

Our Scope 1 greenhouse gas emissions for 2015/16 equate to 7.0 million tonnes carbon dioxide equivalent (2015: 7 million tonnes) and our Scope 2 emissions (excluding electricity transmission and distribution line losses) equate to 0.3 million tonnes (2015: 0.3 million tonnes); combined this is a 62% reduction against our 1990 baseline. These are equivalent to an intensity of around 496 tonnes per £million of revenue (2015: 478). Our Scope 3 emissions for 2015/16 were 35.6 million tonnes. We measure and report in accordance with the World Resources Institute and World Business Council on Sustainable Development Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (Revised Edition) for all six Kyoto gases, using the operational approach for emissions accounting. 100% of our Scope 1 and 2 emissions and 95% of our Scope 3 emissions are independently assured against ISO 14064-3 Greenhouse Gas assurance protocol. This statement is available on our Company website.

 

  

Our customer satisfaction KPI comprises seven components; Ofgem’s UK electricity and gas transmission and distribution customer satisfaction scores and four J.D. Power and Associates customer satisfaction surveys in the US. We have exceeded the two UK Electricity and Gas Transmission targets; the outcome for the third UK Gas Distribution survey will be published later this year.

 

In the US, we did not achieve our targets. Customers were again concerned about higher-than-normal winter bills as a result of electricity commodity price increases and higher gas usage due to cold weather. In an effort to rebuild trust and customer satisfaction, we put in place a customer outreach and education programme similar to last year that focused on energy-saving solutions and bill management.

 

We achieved our target of increasing engagement compared with the previous year.  

We forecast that we will continue to significantly exceed (better) the 45% by 2020 reduction target. We expect the 2050 target to be extremely challenging.

 

 

  Our targets for each business area are set out in the table above.

 

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Our KPIs21


Financial review

 

National Grid delivered another strong performance in 2015/16. This included significant levels of investment in our gas and electricity assets providing important services for millions of customers in the UK and US.

Additional commentary

on financial KPIs

Adjusted operating profit

Adjusted operating profit for the year ended 31 March 20152016 was £3,863£4,096 million, up £199£233 million (5%(6%) fromcompared to last year. With the exception of our UK Gas DistributionElectricity Transmission business, we saw increases in operating profit increased in all of our business segments.

 

Adjusted operating profit by segment£m

 

LOGOLOGO

 

For the year ended 31 March 2015,2016, adjusted operating profit in the UK Electricity Transmission segment increaseddecreased by £150£64 million to £1,173 million. Net regulated income afterRevenue was £223 million higher, mainly reflecting the recovery of higher pass-through costs was £230 million higher, principally reflecting increases in allowed transmission owner revenues this yearsuch as payments to other UK network owners and asystem balancing costs. In addition, £43 million benefit relating toof legal settlements. This was partially offset by under-recoveries of allowedsettlement revenue in the year of £892014/15 was not repeated this year. As mentioned above, pass-through costs were £209 million compared with under-recoveries of £60 million in the prior year.higher. Regulated controllable costs were £14£28 million higher due to inflation organisational changeand salary growth, together with legal cost recoveries in the prior year, higher tower maintenance costs and additional tower maintenance costs.transformation costs associated with our System Operator business. Depreciation and amortisation was £33costs were £14 million higher, reflecting the continued capital investment programme, and other costs were £4£36 million higher than prior year.year including additional asset impairments this year and lower scrap and disposal proceeds.

 

UK Gas Transmission adjusted operating profit increased by £20£49 million to £437£486 million. Net regulated income after pass-through costsRevenue was £42£25 million higher, due to earned gas permit and constraint management incentives. In addition, under-recoveriesincluding over-recovery of allowed revenuerevenues in the year, of £18 million were £3 million favourable to last year’s under-recoveries of £21 million. Partially offsetting thepartly offset by lower pass-through cost recoveries. After deducting pass-through costs, net revenue gains, regulated controllable costs were £8was £46 million higher including additional system operator costs relating to EU work. Other operating costs were also £17 million higher, including decommissioning costs of the Avonmouth LNG plant.

UK Gas Distribution adjusted operating profit decreased to £826 million from £904 million in 2013/14. Net regulated income after pass-through costs was £11 million lower, reflecting changes in allowed revenues for repex expenditure. Timing differences reduced net revenues by a further £16 million, with £13 million over-recoveries in 2014/15 compared with a £29 million over-recovery in thethan prior year. Regulated controllable costs were £22£10 million higher primarily due tothan last year, mainly as a result of inflation, higher gas system service charges and organisational change costs. Depreciation and amortisation costs were £6 million higher, reflecting ongoing investment. Other operating costs were £19 million lower than last year, mostly reflecting additional costs in 2014/15 relating to the closure of LNG facilities.

UK Gas Distribution adjusted operating profit increased by £52 million to £878 million. Revenue was £15£51 million higher, principally reflecting increased regulatory revenue allowances. In part, these allowances were increased to compensate for expected increases in taxation costs reflecting a change to the tax treatment of replacement expenditure. Regulated controllable costs were £21 million higher due to inflation, recruitment, property costs and higher charges from strategic partners to cover connections and flexible winter resourcing. Depreciation and amortisation costs were £12 million higher reflecting the continued capital investment programme,programme. Pass-through costs charged to customers were £11 million lower this year, and other costs were £14£23 million higherlower than prior year, including provisionprioryear, which included provisions for additional asset protection costs.

 

Within our US Regulated businesses,business, adjusted operating profit increased by £39£21 million to £1,164£1,185 million. The effect of the stronger dollar increasedwas to increase operating profit in the year by £30£81 million. Excluding thethis impact from exchange rate movements, revenue decreased by £1,051 million, principally as a result of foreign exchange, net regulated income increasedlower commodity costs passed on to customers and unfavourable timing of recoveries year on year, partly offset by £81 million, reflectinghigher increased revenue allowances under the Niagara Mohawk three yearthree-year rate plan and other regulatedthe benefit of capex trackers. The reduction in revenue increases, partiallywas mostly offset by the impact of the end of LIPA management services agreement (MSA)a £1,027 million reduction in December 2013. In addition, over-recoveries of allowed revenues in the year of £30 million were £20 million favourable to last year’s over-recoveries of £10 million. Regulated controllablepass-through costs increased by £17 million excluding(excluding the impact of foreign exchange,exchange). Regulated controllable costs reduced by £71 million at constant currency, partly as a result of increasedlower gas leak and compliance work this year and additional costs incurred last year to improve data quality toand bring regulatory filings up to date. This was partly offset by the removal of costs associated with the LIPA MSA activities. Following last year’s exceptionally cold winter, bad debtDepreciation and amortisation costs were £62£51 million higher excluding the impactthis year at constant currency as a result of foreign exchange. Thereongoing investment in our networks. Pension costs were no major storms affecting our operations in the years ended 31 March 2014 and 2015.£15 million higher at constant currency, while other operating costs were £41 million higher at constant currency, including higher asset removal costs.

 

Adjusted operating profit in Other activities was £68£175 million higher at £199£374 million. OperatingIn the US, adjusted operating profit was £143 million higher, reflecting lower spend on upgrades to our finance systems which were completed last year. In addition, we benefited from a £49 million gain on disposal of our investment in the French interconnectorIroquois pipeline, and a reduction in the costs associated with our investment in Clean Line. In the UK, adjusted operating profit was £18£32 million higher mainly as a result of strong auction revenues this year. In the US, corporatein our French interconnector (IFA) business and other activities losses were £63 million lower, mainly as a result of the completion of the enterprise resource planning system stabilisation in the first half of the year.higher property sales proceeds.

 

Adjusted earnings

For the year ended 31 March 2015,2016, adjusted net finance costs were £75£20 million lower than 2013/14they were in 2014/15 at £1,033£1,013 million, mainly as a resultwith lower UK RPI inflation, continued focus on management of lower average grosscash balances, and the benefit of last year’s debt throughbuybacks offsetting the year, lower RPI rates inimpact of the UKstronger US dollar and refinancing debt at lower rates.increasing net debt.

 

TheOur adjusted tax charge was £114£58 million higher than 2013/14.it was in 2014/15. This was mainly due to higher profits before tax and the non-recurrence of one-off items that benefited the prior year. As a result of this, thetax. The effective tax rate for 2014/152015/16 was 24.0% (2014/15: 24.2% (2013/14: 22.5%).

The earnings performance described above has translated into adjusted earnings of £2,189 million, up £174 million on last year. This equates to adjusted earnings per share (EPS) of 58.1 pence, up 4.6 pence (9%) on 2013/14.

Scrip restatement

In accordance with IAS 33, all EPS and adjusted EPS amounts for comparative periods have been restated as a result of shares issued via scrip dividends.

Measurement of financial performance

We describe and explain our results principally on an adjusted basis and explain the rationale for this on page 186. We present results on an adjusted basis before exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries. See page 186 for further details and reconciliations from the adjusted profit measures to IFRS, under which we report our financial results and position.

  LOGO

    20


 

This section

provides additional commentary on our KPIs and other performance metrics we use to monitor our business performance. Analysis of our financial performance and position as at 31 March 2015,2016, including detailed commentary on the performance of our operating segments, is located in the financial statements. However, this analysis still forms part of our Strategic Report financial review. See page 77 for further information.

See pages 187197 to 189199 for commentary on our financial performance and position for the year ended 31 March 20142015 compared with 31 March 2013.2014. We have also included analysis of our UK regulated financial performance by segment on page 100.108.

In focus

Use of adjusted profit measures

page 196

Commentary on the consolidated income statement

page 95

Commentary on results of our principal operations by segment

pages 107–108

Further details of how our performance metrics are calculated

page 202

22National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Strategic Report


   Strategic Report

 

In focus

Reconciliations of adjusted profit measures

page 196

Commentary on statement of financial position

page 99

The earnings performance described on the previous page has translated into adjusted earnings of £2,386 million, up £197 million on last year. This equates to adjusted earnings per share (EPS) of 63.5 pence, up 5.9 pence (10%) on 2014/15.

Scrip restatement

In accordance with IAS 33, all EPS and adjusted EPS amounts for comparative periods have been restated as a result of shares issued via scrip dividends.

Measurement of financial performance

We describe and explain our results principally on an adjusted basis and explain the rationale for this on page 196. We present results on an adjusted basis before exceptional items and remeasurements. See page 196 for further details and reconciliations from the adjusted profit measures to IFRS, under which we report our financial results and position. A reconciliation between reported operating profit and adjusted operating profit is provided below. Further commentary on movements in the income statement is provided on page 95.

   

Year ended 31 March

 

£m  2016    2015    2014  

Total operating profit

  4,085    3,780   3,735  

Exceptional items

  22    –   (55) 

Remeasurements – commodity contracts

  (11)   83   (16) 

Adjusted operating profit

  4,096    3,863   3,664  

Adjusted net finance costs

  (1,013)   (1,033)  (1,108) 

Share of post-tax results of joint ventures

  59    46   28  

Adjusted taxation

  (753)   (695)  (581) 

Attributable to non-controlling interests

  (3)     12  

Adjusted earnings

          2,386        2,189       2,015  

Adjusted EPS (pence)

  63.5    57.6   53.1  

Group return on equity (RoE)

We measure our performance in generating value for our shareholders by dividing our annual return by our equity base.

Group RoE has increased during the year to 12.3%, from 11.8% in 2014/15. During the year, the UK regulated businesses delivered a solid operational return of 13.3% in aggregate (2014/15: 13.7%), including an assumption of 3% long run average RPI inflation. US operational returns (calculated on a calendar year) of 8.0% were slightly down on last year, reflecting high winter gas leak and snow removal costs at the start of 2015, together with rate base growth.

Overall, other activities in the Group delivered a good performance, including an improved result from the French and BritNed interconnectors, higher property sales, the gain on sale of our interest in the Iroquois pipeline and lower US other costs following the completion of our financial system upgrade last year. Treasury performance also helped the result, through lower RPI accretions on the Group’s index linked debt, ongoing focus on effective cash management and the benefit of last year’s debt repurchases. Together, these helped to offset the headwind from a lower cost of debt allowance under the tracker within the UK price controls.

Regulated asset base growth

In total, our UK regulated asset value (RAV) and US rate base increased by £1.8 billion (5%) to £38.8 billion. This reflects the continued high levels of investment in our networks in both the UK and US, together with the impact of the stronger US dollar.

The UK RAV increased by £0.7 billion, reflecting significant capital expenditure, together with inflation, although RPI inflation at 1.6% (March to March), was below our 3% long term expectation. UK RAV growth also included capitalised efficiencies or ‘performance RAV’ of £115 million this year.

US rate base has increased by £1.1 billion this year. Of this, £0.4 billion was due to foreign exchange movements increasing the rate base reported in sterling. Excluding foreign exchange, rate base increased by £0.7 billion, reflecting a significant year of US investment.

Value added

Our dividend is an important part of returns to shareholders along with growth in the value of the asset base attributable to equity investors. These are reflected in the value added metric that underpins our approach to sustainable decision-making and long-term incentive arrangements.

Overall value added in the year was £1.8 billion or 47.6 pence per share as set out below:

   

Year ended 31 March

 

£bn at constant currency      2016       2015       Change  

UK regulated assets1

  26.0   25.5   +0.5  

US regulated assets1

  14.1   13.9   +0.2  

Other invested capital

  1.9   1.5   +0.4  

Total assets

  42.0   40.9   +1.1  

Dividend paid

      +1.3  

Share buyback

      +0.3  

Movement in goodwill

      –  

Net debt

  (25.3)  (24.4)  -0.9  

Value added

        +1.8  

Value added per share

        47.6p  

1. Includes assets held outside RAV and rate base.

Value added in the year was higher than 2014/15 (£1.7 billion or 44.7p per share), primarily as a result of higher inflation on UK regulated assets (March 2016 RPI of 1.6%, prior year 0.9%), together with the gain on disposal of our share of the Iroquois pipeline. Of the £1.8 billion value added in 2015/16, £1,337 million was paid to shareholders as cash dividends and £267 million as share repurchases (offsetting the scrip issuance during the year), with £183 million retained in the business.

The Board is confident that growth in assets, earnings and cash flows, supported by improving cash efficiency and an exposure to attractive regulatory markets, should help the Group to maintain strong, stable credit ratings and a consistent prudent level of gearing, while delivering attractive returns for shareholders.

 

  

A reconciliation between reported operating profit and adjusted operating profit is provided below. Further commentary on movements in the income statement is provided on page 87.

    

US rate base has increased by £1.8 billion this year. Of this, £1.2 billion was due to foreign exchange movements increasing the rate base reported in sterling. Excluding foreign exchange, rate base increased by £0.6 billion, reflecting a record year of US investment.

 

Value added

Our dividend is an important part of returns to shareholders along with growth in the value of the asset base attributable to equity investors. These are reflected in the value added metric that underpins our approach to sustainable decision-making and long-term incentive arrangements.

 

Overall value added in the year was £1.7 billion or 44.7 pence per share as set out below:

  

LOGO

              
     Year ended 31 March    
  £m   2015      2014     2013       
  

 

      
 

Total operating profit

Exceptional items

Remeasurements

– commodity contracts

Stranded cost recoveries

 

 

 

 

 

3,780 

– 

 

83 

– 

  

  

 

  

  

 

 

 

 

 

3,735 

(55)

 

(16)

– 

  

  

 

  

  

3,749 

84 

 

(180)

(14)

 
  

 

      
 

Adjusted operating profit

 3,863    3,664   

3,639 

 
 

Adjusted net finance costs

 (1,033)   (1,108)  

(1,124)

 
 

Share of post-tax results of

 
 

joint ventures

 46    28   

18 

 
 

Adjusted taxation

 (695)   (581)  

(619)

 
 

Attributable to non-

 
 

controlling interests

    12   (1) 
  

 

      
 

Adjusted earnings

 2,189    2,015   1,913  
  

 

            
 

Adjusted EPS (pence)

 58.1    53.5   

50.9 

  Year ended 31 March  
  

 

            
  £bn at constant currency 2015    2014   Change
      

 

  
  UK regulated assets1 25.5    25.2   +0.3 
  
  Group return on equity (RoE)    US regulated assets1   13.5      12.6     +0.9   
  

We measure our performance in generating value for our shareholders by dividing our annual return by our equity base.

 

Group RoE has increased during the year to 11.8%, from 11.4% in 2013/14. During the year, the UK regulated businesses delivered good returns of 13.7% in aggregate in the second year of their new price controls (2013/14: 12.7%), including the assumed 3% long-run average RPI inflation. US returns (on a higher average equity ratio than the UK) of 8.4% were down on last year, reflecting the additional costs incurred on gas mains repair and emergency leak response and the increased level of rate base growth since 2013. Overall, other activities in the Group delivered a good performance, including an improved result from the French interconnector and lower US corporate costs following the completion of the enterprise resource planning system stabilisation during the year. Treasury performance also helped the result, partly assisted by lower RPI accretions on the Group’s index-linked debt. Together, these helped to offset the headwind from lower cost of debt allowances under the tracker within the new UK price controls.

 

Regulated asset growth

In total our UK regulated asset value (RAV) and US rate base increased by £2.3 billion (7%) to £37.0 billion. This reflects the continued high levels of investment in our networks in both the UK and US, together with the impact of the stronger US dollar. The rate of growth at constant currency was 3%.

 

The UK RAV increased by £0.5 billion, reflecting significant capital expenditure, together with inflation, although at 0.9% RPI, this has had a smaller impact than in recent years. UK RAV growth also included capitalised efficiencies or ‘performance RAV’ of £111 million this year.

  

Other invested capital

   1.6      1.7     

-0.1 

  
    

 

  
 

Total assets

 40.6    39.5   

+1.1 

 

 

Dividend paid

 

+1.3 

 

 

Share buyback

 

+0.3 

 

Movement in goodwill

– 

 

 

Net debt

 

 

 

(23.9)

 

  

 

 

 

(22.9)

 

  

 

-1.0 

    

 

  
 

 

Value added

 

+1.7 

    

 

  
 

 

Value added per share

 

44.7p 

    

 

  
 
 

1.  Includes assets held outside RAV and rate base.

 
 

Value added in the year was lower than 2013/14 (£2.1 billion or 57.2 pence per share), primarily led by the impact of lower RPI on UK regulated asset growth. RPI inflation for March 2015 was 0.9% compared with 2.5% in March 2014 and National Grid’s long-run assumption of 3.0%. Of the £1.7 billion value added in 2014/15, £1,271 million was paid to shareholders as cash dividends and £335 million (excluding £3 million of transaction costs) as share repurchases (offsetting the scrip issuance during the year), with £79 million retained in the business.

 

The Board is confident that growth in assets, earnings and cash flows, supported by improving cash efficiency and an exposure to attractive regulatory markets, should help the Group to maintain strong, stable credit ratings and a consistent prudent level of gearing, while delivering attractive returns for shareholders.

 

Other performance measures

UK regulated return on equity

The UK RoE has increased 100bps to 13.7%, reflecting particularly strong incentive performance in the Gas Transmission business and further outperformance against our totex targets in Electricity Transmission, achieved through efficiencies within the capital investment programme. This performance represents 360bps outperformance over allowed returns. Our UK RoE does not include the impact of legal settlement benefits of £56 million. If these were included UK RoE would increase by 60bps to 14.3%.

LOGO

 NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16 21Financial review
23


Strategic Report

Financial reviewcontinued

 

Financial reviewcontinued

Other performance measures

UK regulated return on equity

UK RoE has decreased 40bps to 13.3%. This reduction in RoE reflects a reduction in incentive performance year on year, particularly as a result of the end of the gas permit incentive scheme last year. Totex out-performance was at a similar level to last year. This performance represents 320bps of outperformance over allowed returns.

UK return on equity%

 

LOGO

LOGO

 

US regulated return on equity

The US RoE hasfor calendar year 2015 decreased 60bps40bps to 8.4%8.0%, reflecting high winter gas leak and snow removal costs at the additional costs incurred this yearstart of 2015, together with rate base growth as a result of the severe winter weather and the additional gas mains leak investigation and repair work required, together with rate base growth.record capital investment spend.

 

US return on equity1%

 

LOGO

LOGO

 

1. Calculated on a calendar year basis.

 

Cash generated from operationsReturn on capital employed

Cash generated from operations was £5,350 million (2013/14: £4,419 million). Changes in working capital improved by £360 millionRoCE provides a performance comparison between our regulated UK and US businesses and is one of the measures that we use to monitor our portfolio of businesses. The table below shows our RoCE for our businesses over the priorlast five years:

Return on capital employed%

LOGO

The UK RoCE has decreased from 8.6% to 8.1% in 2015/16. This reduction reflects one-off benefits of legal settlements last year principallyin Electricity Transmission that did not repeat and the reduction in gas permit and legacy incentive revenues in our Gas Transmission business in the year. Excluding these two items, operational performance, incentives and returns are at similar levels to last year.

US (£441 million) dueRoCE has decreased by 30bps in the year to 5.7%. Regulated financial performance was at a similar level to last year, however the collectionoverall return has decreased as high levels of high winter 2014 billingscapital investment have driven rate base growth.

Capital expenditure

For the year ended 31 March 2016, capital expenditure of £3,893 million was £423 million higher than last year. The Group also invested £63 million in the St William Homes joint venture with Berkeley Group and £53 million in other settlementsjoint ventures including Superstorm Sandy reinsurance claims and LIPA receipts. Cash outflows relating to exceptional items were £133 million lower, as the prior year included reorganisation costs ina new electricity interconnector between the UK and LIPA MSA transition costsBelgium.

Our US Regulated business continues to increase levels of investment in both electricity and gas distribution reinforcement. Capital expenditure in 2015/16 was £355 million higher than last year, and reflected higher spend on gas mains replacement, gas customer growth, system reinforcement and initial spend on a solar project in Massachusetts, together with the impact of a stronger US dollar.

UK Gas Distribution capital expenditure was £51 million higher than last year, reflecting an increased level of mains replacement work, in line with our target to replace a pre-determined length of main over the course of the RIIO-GD1 period.

Capital expenditure£m

LOGO

Dividend growth

We remain committed to our dividend policy to grow the dividend at least in line with the rate of average RPI inflation each year for the foreseeable future.

During the year we generated £1.9 billion of business net cash flow after our capital expenditure programmes. This has enabled the growth of the dividend in line with average RPI, being 1.1% (2014/15: 2.0%; 2013/14: 2.9%), taking into account the recommended final dividend of 28.34 pence.

During the year, the Company has repurchased shares in the US.market with the overall goal being to reduce the dilutive effect of the scrip as much as possible to the extent that is consistent with maintaining the Group’s strong financial position as reflected in its credit rating.

In focus

Commentary on the consolidated cash flow statement    

page 101

 

Commentary on borrowings

page 131

24National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Strategic Report


   Strategic Report

In focus

UK regulation                

pages 176–177

US regulation

pages 178–182

Net debt and credit metrics

Our net debt levels will continue to grow for the next few years as we fund ourWe expect capital investment programmes and enhance our networks.network enhancement will continue to be funded by market borrowings. We continue to borrow at attractive rates when needed and the level of net debt remains appropriate for the size of our business.

 

During 2014/15,2015/16, net debt has increased by £2.7£1.4 billion. This is predominantly due todriven by net business cash inflows (after capex) of £1.9 billion, more than offset by outflows from interest, dividends, tax and other financing flows of £2.6 billion, with other non cash movements insuch as foreign exchange rates as the US dollar strengthened against sterling. Gross borrowings are relatively consistent year on year, reflecting the current yearand accretion increasing net refinancing of maturities and bond repurchases, while cash and investment levels have been actively managed down.

With the commencement of the RIIO price controls in 2013 and the slow down in our planned near-term UK capital investment programme as the industry assesses the impact of Electricity Market Reform, we reviewed and restructured the Group debt portfolio. The review resulted inby a £924 million bond repurchase programme, of which £295 million was achieved through a cash tender offer for five bonds. The net repurchase cost of £131 million has been presented as exceptional finance costs in the income statement, as noted on page 104.further £0.7 billion.

 

A key measure we use to monitor financial discipline is retained cash flow divided by adjusted net debt (RCF/net debt). This is a measure of the operating cash flows we generate, before capital investment but after dividends paid to shareholders, compared with the level of debt we hold. The principal adjustmentadjustments made to net debt is to includeare in respect of pension deficits.deficits and hybrid debt instruments. RCF/net debt was 11.2%11.5% for the year (2013/(2014/15: 11.2%; 2013/14: 10.5%; 2012/13: 11.4%). For the current year, we have used this measure to actively manage scrip uptake through buying back shares when supported by sufficient headroom. Deducting the costcosts of buying back these shares reduces RCF/net debt to 9.9%10.5% for the year.

 

Our long-term target range for RCF/net debt is to exceed 9.0%, which is consistent with the A3 rating threshold used by Moody’s, the rating agency.

LOGO

 

We additionally monitor interest cover, which is a measure of the cash flows we generate compared with the net interest cost of servicing our borrowings. Interest cover for the year was 5.5 times (2014/15: 5.1 times (2013/times; 2013/14: 4.1 times; 2012/13: 3.9 times).

Our target long-term rate for interest cover is in excess of 33.0 times.

Return on capital employed

RoCE provides a performance comparison between our regulated UK and US businesses and is one of the measures that we use to monitor our portfolio of businesses. The table below shows our RoCE for our businesses over the last five years:

Return on capital employed%

LOGO

The UK RoCE has increased from 8.0% to 8.6% in 2014/15. This reflects the strong incentive performance in Gas Transmission and further totex outperformance in Electricity Transmission, together with one-off benefits of legal settlements in the year.

US RoCE has decreased by 40bps in the year to 6.0%, as a result of the additional maintenance to improve reliability and safety and bring regulatory filings up to date, together with rate base growth driven by capital expenditure spend.

Capital expenditure

For the year ended 31 March 2015, capital expenditure of £3,470 million was at a similar level to last year, with reductions in spend in UK Electricity Transmission being offset by increases in capital spend in our US Regulated businesses.

The reduction in spend in UK Electricity Transmission reflected delays in the manufacture of cable for the Western HVDC link and a reduced level of overhead line work, with a number of projects having completed over the last two years. In addition

  

        22


we continue to look for innovative ways to reduce total expenditure (totex) under our RIIO regulatory arrangements while still delivering agreed outputs.

Within our US Regulated businesses, capital expenditure was higher year on year reflecting higher levels of mains replacement work, gas system reinforcement and growth spend, electricity capacity spend and progress on the New England East-West Solution (NEEWS) electricity transmission project.

Capital expenditure£m

LOGO

Dividend growth

We remain committed to our dividend policy to grow the dividend at least in line with the rate of average RPI inflation each year for the foreseeable future.

During the year we generated £2.1 billion of business net cash flow after our capital expenditure programmes. This has enabled the growth of the dividend in line with average RPI, being 2.0% (2013/14: 2.9%; 2012/13: 4.0%), taking into account the recommended final dividend of 28.16 pence.

During the year, the Company has repurchased shares in the market with the overall goal being to reduce the dilutive effect of the scrip as much as possible to the extent that is consistent with maintaining the Group’s strong financial position as reflected in its credit rating.

Regulatory financial performance

Timing and regulated revenue adjustments

As described on pages 166176 to 172,182, our allowed revenues are set in accordance with our regulatory price controls or rate plans. We calculate the tariffs we charge our customers based on the estimated volume of energy we expect will be delivered during the coming period. The actual volumes delivered will differ from thisthe estimate. Therefore, our total actual revenue will be different from our total allowed revenue. These differences are commonly referred to as timing differences.

 

If we collect more than the allowed level of revenue, the balance must be returned to customers in subsequent periods, and if we collect less than the allowed level of revenue we may recover the balance from customers in subsequent periods. In the US, a substantial portion of our costs are pass-through costs (including commodity and energy efficiency costs) and are fully recoverable from our customers. Timing differences between costs of this type being incurred and their recovery through revenue are also included in timing.

The amounts calculated as timing differences are estimates and subject to change until the variables that determine allowed revenue are final.

 

Our operating profit for the year includes a total estimated in-year under-collectionover-collection of £64£25 million (2013/14: £42(2014/15: £64 million under-collection). Our closing balance at 31 March 20152016 was £27£48 million under-recovered.

over-recovered. In the UK, there was a cumulative under-recovery of £177£87 million at 31 March 2015 (2014: 2016 (2015:under-recovery of £83£177 million). All other things being equal, the balance will start to be recovered from customers in the year ending 31 March 2016.

In the US, cumulative timing over-recoveries at 31 March 20152016 were £150£135 million (2014: £117(2015: £150 million over-recovery). The majority of that balance will be returned to customers next year.

 

In addition to the timing adjustments described above, as part of the RIIO price controls in the UK, outperformance against allowances as a result of the totex incentive mechanism, together with changes in output-related allowances included in the original price control, will almost always be adjusted in future revenue recoveries, typically starting in two years’ time.

 

Our current IFRS revenues and earnings include these amounts that will need to be repaid or recovered in future periods. Such adjustments will form an important part of the continuing difference between reported IFRS results and underlying economic performance based on our regulatory obligations.

 

For our UK regulated businesses as a whole, regulated revenue adjustments totalled £174£262 million in the year (2013/14: £106(2014/15: £174 million). This is based on our estimates of: work carried out in line with allowances; in expectation of future allowances; or work avoided altogether – either as a result of us finding innovative solutions or of the need being permanently removed.

In the US, accumulated regulatory entitlements to future revenue net of over- or under-recoveries amounted to £1,528£1,335 million at 31 March 2015 (2014: £1,0242016 (2015: £1,528 million). These entitlements cover a range of different areas, with the most significant being environmental remediation and pension assets, as well as deferred storm costs.

 

All regulatory entitlements are recoverable (or repayable) over different periods, which are agreed with the regulators to match the expected payment profile for the liabilities. As at 31 March 2015,2016, these extend until 2071.

Major storms

Despite the very cold winter across much of the US including record snowfall in parts of New England, there were no major storms in 2014/15 or 2013/14.

LOGO

LOGO

NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/1523


Strategic Report

Our people

If we are to achieve our strategic objectives, we need to

make sure our employees have the right skills and capabilities.

LOGO

Safeguarding the future

There is a significant skills challenge facing the engineering profession in the UK. Research by EngineeringUK has highlighted a need for 1.8 million engineers, technicians and crafts people over the period 2012–2022. Around 60% of all new jobs in this period will need science, technology, engineering and maths (STEM) qualifications, yet not enough school children succeed in these areas.

There is a similar challenge in the US where the number of scientists and engineers needed to meet growth and net replacement needs between 2012 and 2022 is 2.3 million, including 1.2 million in the computer occupations and more than 540,000 engineers.

We are helping schools, parents and children see engineering as a modern, dynamic, desirable career with a great future. Our employees act as education ambassadors who volunteer their time for a range of activities in the classroom and at science and engineering fairs, most notably on STEM enrichment, careers education and work experience programmes.

Our careers education programmes in the UK include Careers Lab, an initiative we developed that was taken up by the charity Business in the Community in November 2014. It links working professionals from a range of sectors with schools to bring the world of work to life for secondary school children. A further initiative is the ‘Engineer Your Future’ exhibition at London’s Science Museum, which opened in December 2014 and explores engineering challenges through interactive games and digital experiences.

During 2014/15, we have expanded our residential work experience programme (balanced 50/50 between girls and boys) to include a non-residential programme for students aged 16–19 who are in sixth form or college and do not have an existing relationship with an employer.

This year, we invested nearly £900,000 in our education outreach, bringing benefits to 70 schools and more than 9,000 students who receive at least one hour of STEM/careers experience with our education ambassadors. We expect this to grow considerably in the UK through Careers Lab.

In the US, we continue to partner with seven local community colleges to deliver energy utility technology training programmes, designed to equip people for jobs in the energy industry. These programmes currently focus on future line workers. We plan to expand them to include technical skills for the gas industry.

We are continuing our partnership with the Center for Energy Workforce Development on its ‘energy industry fundamentals’, and we work with veterans through the US Troops to Energy Jobs programme. This is designed to help veterans make the transition from military service to the energy/utility industry.

We completed the fifth year of our Engineering Pipeline Program. This is a developmental programme designed to inspire promising students to become engineers and provide them an opportunity for fast tracked employment with National Grid.

We are working with the State University of New York and its network of colleges and universities. The aim is to prepare students for careers in the energy and utilities industry by improving the educational opportunities available to them. We expect this partnership to increase the volume of qualified entry-level candidates looking to join National Grid.

Our US work experience opportunities include six to eight week summer internships for college students, so they can gain work experience with National Grid. A number of these interns start their journey into the energy industry through our Engineering Our Future programme and go on to join our Company.

In the UK, we offer summer internships and also 12 month industrial placements to undergraduates in their penultimate year. These programmes offer students the opportunity to experience the culture, working and ethical practices of National Grid before they make the all-important decision to join the organisation as graduates.

Building skills and expertise

During 2014/15, we have worked on boosting the capabilities of our employees in the areas of Performance Excellence (see page 27), stakeholder engagement, customer focus and contract management. We see these capabilities as being crucial in helping us improve our performance and meet regulatory and customer expectations.

More than 900 employees have attended our Performance Excellence programmes; more than 650 employees have attended our stakeholder engagement and customer focus programmes; and around 250 employees have attended our contract management programmes.

Our executive team and senior leaders in the UK and US are participating in a programme to develop performance leadership skills. To prepare for our future engineering skills needs, we have built aT-pylon development facility at our Eakring learning centre in the UK.

We remain committed to investing in our people, providing the training and other support necessary for them to build, maintain and operate our networks safely and reliably, and this year we provided more than one million learner hours of training across our UK and US businesses.

       24


  

Promoting an inclusive and diverse workforce

We aim to develop and operate our business with an inclusive and diverse culture, with equal opportunity to all in recruitment, career development, training and reward. This applies to all employees regardless of race, gender identity, nationality, age, disability, sexual orientation, religion and background. Our policies support the attraction and retention of the best people, improve effectiveness, deliver superior performance and enhance our success.

 

In the UK we were recognised as a Times Top 50 Employer for Women for 2015 and reached the Gold level in our benchmarking with both Race for Opportunity and Opportunity Now during 2014. Both these campaigns also recognised us as a Top 10 private sector employer. Our Employee Resource Groups (ERGs) continue to support our business goals and participate in events that encourage students to consider careers needing STEM qualifications.

 

In the US, our ERGs support our business goals and ambitions. They are at the forefront of our inclusion and diversity initiatives – including our commitment to hire veterans and people with disabilities, as well as our efforts to promote understanding of unconscious bias.

 

The table below shows the breakdown by gender at different levels of the organisation. We have included information relating to subsidiary directors, as this is required by the Companies Act 2006 (Strategic Report and Directors’ Reports) Regulations 2013. We define ‘senior management’ as those managers who are at the same level, or one level below our Executive Committee. It also includes those who are directors of subsidiaries, or who have responsibility for planning, directing or controlling the activities of the Company, or a strategically significant part of the Company, and are employees of the Company.

 

   

Health and wellbeing

Among our programmes for 2014/15 we have worked to address the stigma and discrimination associated with mental health. We signed the UK Government-led ‘Time to Change’ pledge and have trained a further 92 employees in mental health first aid. We have also helped more than 4,000 of our employees and our service providers’ staff understand their ‘heart age’ and run a weight-loss campaign that raised more than £4,000 for Macmillan Cancer Support.

 

In the US we have refreshed our soft tissue injury programme, aimed at helping reduce muscular skeletal disorders. Our employee opinion survey results continue to show that employees have a growing awareness of our wellbeing programmes.

 

Volunteering

Our employees continue to support our local communities, sharing their time and expertise on a range of skills-based volunteering and fundraising activities.

 

In the UK we raised over £500,000 for good causes and provided over 9,000 hours of support to community projects. Our support of City Year now includes a new mentoring programme in Birmingham and we launched ‘Good Leaders’, a programme that shares our leadership expertise with the charity sector. In the US, our Power to Serve employee volunteering programme supports our stewardship and safety principles. It seeks to acknowledge existing community service, as well as to create new volunteer opportunities for employees.

 

Human rights

Respect for human rights is incorporated into our employment practices and our values. See page 185 for more information.

  

LOGO

     Financial year ended 31 March 2015              
      Male  Female Total 

Male

%

 

Female 

             
  

Our Board

  8   3 11 72.7 27.3        
  

Senior management

  183   58 241 75.9 24.1        
  

Whole Company*

  18,554   5,720 24,274 76.4 23.6        
  

 

* This measure is also one of our Company KPIs. See pages 18 and 19 for more information.

     
              
         LOGO

LOGO

NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/1525


LOGO

Inspiring future engineers
Connecting to life:
Engineer Your Future
We are part of a business consortium supporting ‘Engineer Your Future’ at the UK’s Science Museum in London. The exhibition will run until the end of 2017 and is designed to inspire and engage young people about the exciting world of engineering. This complements the work we are doing with young people and organisations like VEX Robotics, shown above.
The exhibition features a series of interactive hands-on exhibits, including FutureVille, a vibrant futuristic cityscape controlled by the visitor’s smartphone. The Science Museum is using ‘Engineer Your Future’ to pledge support to the UK Government’s Your Life campaign, which aims to boost the number of young people in the UK studying physics and mathematics. nationalgridconnecting.com/inspiring-for-the-future sciencemuseum.org.uk/engineeryourfuture
26


Principal operations

Overview of our UK operational businesses during 2014/15

LOGO

Our UK regulated businesses delivered a strong financial performance in the second year of RIIO. We aim to create value for our stakeholders by focusing on performance and making sure our processes are as efficient as they can be (see ‘Performance Excellence’ below). Savings generated in the first two years of RIIO will reduce future customer bills by around £200 million.

We have also established a new organisational structure to give stakeholders a clearer picture of how our activities are organised and delivered.

We have responded to concerns about the cost of energy and the security of the UK’s energy supply. In evidence to parliamentary inquiries we have explained our role, the services we provide and what those services cost. We have also been working with stakeholders in Europe to plan for the future impact of European Union energy policy on our business.

Our non-regulated businesses have been focused on getting the best value from our existing portfolio and exploring opportunities for future growth. For further information see page 36. We have also signed two new interconnector agreements: with Elia, the Belgian Transmission System Operator, for an electricity interconnector between the UK and Belgium; and with Statnett, the Norwegian Transmission System Operator, for NSN Link, the first interconnector between the UK and Norway. These agreements signal the start of the construction phases of these projects.

Principal risks

As described in the Internal controls and risk management section (pages 38 to 41), we identify, monitor and manage risks at various levels within our Company. The key risks our UK business faces are organised into a UK regional risk profile which is regularly reviewed by UK senior leadership. The main risk themes currently featured in this profile are:

  the risk of changes to the complex political and regulatory agenda for UK and European energy policy development and their potential implications for our business;

  challenges associated with making sure the data required to deliver business processes and regulatory requirements is complete, accurate and consistent;

  the impact of changes in our business structure and processes on our ability to continue to perform under RIIO; and

  continued management of safety, security and network resilience.

System Operator (SO) progress

Our SO role is described on pages 08 and 11.

The UK faces tightening capacity margins between supply and demand for the next three years. Helping the market to make the right decisions to maintain security of supply has been an important theme in our role as SO during 2014/15.

Following a number of generation plant outages over the winter, the two new balancing services developed to provide additional reserves were tendered as a precaution. Although these additional reserves were not used this year, they have also been tendered to procure additional capacity for winter 2015/16 when margins are predicted to tighten further.

We have continued to work with stakeholders to develop and implement EMR. We completed pre-qualification and auctions for the Capacity Market and the Contract for Difference (CfD) feed-in tariff regime. The capacity market auction this year procured additional capacity ready for the first year of delivery in 2018/19. Contracts were signed with 25 applicants following the first auction for CfD.

We have led the development of changes to the gas transmission regulatory framework that will help customers plan their long-term projects through an improved way of reserving capacity. We have also developed a new framework that adds current system operation knowledge to long-term predictions about the future energy landscape. This helps us plan for the right services and products to operate the system in the future.

Priorities for the year ahead

Our role as SO is set to evolve during 2015/16, following the conclusion of Ofgem’s Integrated Transmission Planning and Regulation project. As part of this, the SO is expected to undertake a number of new advisory roles. We have a long track record in successfully managing potential conflicts of interest from our SO role and will work closely with Ofgem to make sure this continues.

We will also be engaging further with the industry, aiming to increase opportunities for demand-side participation within the GB market.

Performance Excellence

Performance Excellence is an approach that will help us to achieve our Company objectives by looking for improvements to all of our processes. It aims to save time and make us more efficient so we can deliver better value for our customers and stakeholders – from new ideas that improve processes, to introducing equipment that does things more effectively. For example, in our UK Gas Distribution business, regional Performance Excellence teams are working with our operational teams to identify their common challenges and find the right solutions. As a result we have introduced a new helpdesk service for our Gas Distribution field force. This new service means technology problems are resolved more quickly, helping them to be more productive and better meet customer needs. See page 35 to read more about Performance Excellence in the US.

LOGO

NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/1527


Strategic Report

Principal operationscontinued

UK Electricity Transmission

LOGO

What we do

We own the electricity transmission system in England and Wales. Our networks comprise approximately 7,200 kilometres (4,470 miles) of overhead line, 1,500 kilometres (932 miles) of underground cable and 336 substations.

Market context

Although demand for electricity is generally increasing around the world, in the UK it is expected to remain broadly flat over the next five to 10 years.

Changes in the sources and characteristics of generation connecting to our network, such as wind and nuclear generation, mean we need to respond by developing the way we balance and operate our network to accommodate these sources.

Over the last two years, some generators have delayed their connection dates to the network and this means our future investment profile for electricity transmission is flatter than in previous years. However, we are ready to respond to connection dates when we need to. We will continue to renew our network to deliver the network reliability our customers require as efficiently as possible.

What we’ve achieved during 2014/15

The full tunnel network on our London Power Tunnels project has been completed, and the remaining works programme is forecast to complete ahead of schedule and under budget. We have also completed the development of a £164 million asset replacement and customer connection project for Wimbledon.

We made progress on substation and cable construction work for several new Network Rail connections, as well as Crossrail connections in London. These connections are required to support the national railway electrification programme from 2015 to 2017.

We achieved a significant engineering milestone, installing the first ever series compensation device on the UK network. This device, which adds capacity to a transmission circuit, can increase power flows from Scotland. With both National Grid and Scottish Power series compensation in service, the Scotland-England boundary capacity is expected to increase by 1 GW.

We have continued to develop the innovativeT-pylon and are considering where it could be offered alongside other connection options when developing new transmission circuits. The first T-pylon has been installed at our Eakring training facility.

Our Visual Impact Provision (VIP) project gathered pace. Our policy to make use of the £500 million allowance under RIIO to mitigate the visual impact of our overhead lines in National Parks and Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty was agreed with Ofgem. A stakeholder advisory group, including representatives of organisations with a national focus on our natural heritage, is helping us choose which transmission lines should be prioritised and how the fund should be allocated.

We agreed an RPI-linked bank loan facility of £1.5 billion with the European Investment Bank (EIB). This is the largest ever single loan by the EIB and is now available to fund capital investment in National Grid Electricity Transmission plc.

We also deployed new tools and systems to our field workforce, winning the Mobile Innovation category at the SAP UK Quality Awards.

Priorities for the year ahead

Safety: Make sure our suppliers and employees manage their safety performance when working near our transmission assets. This includes seeking evidence that they are using effective safety management systems.

Maintenance: Establish a programme to change the way we plan and deliver all work on our assets by balancing risk, performance and delivery costs.

              LOGO

Hinkley Point C connection: Continue to progress the regulatory submissions needed for the Hinkley Point C connection project to secure the funding for delivery.

Visual Impact Provision: Through our VIP project we will identify the final locations where the visual impact of our networks will be reduced.

Data and technology: Continue to improve how we define and capture the network data that helps us make better decisions on our assets and respond more quickly to customer demand for new connections.

       28


 UK Gas Transmission

In focus:

What we do

the remainder coming from Norway, continental Europe, or further afield via shipped imports of LNG.

Overall, supply capacity now exceeds peak demand by more than 25%, giving our customers significant flexibility over which sources of gas they choose to meet demand. Newer sources of supply, such as LNG importation terminals and storage sites, can respond to demand more quickly than traditional UKCS supplies. Our network therefore needs to be able to respond to changing day-to-day supply and demand patterns.

We also need to prepare for an uncertain energy landscape in the long term. UK reliance on imported gas supplies will vary depending on the level of gas supply from the UKCS and the development of indigenous gas sources.

We are working closely with our customers and stakeholders to meet these operational challenges. We are focused on continuing to develop our network and services to meet their needs safely, reliably and efficiently.

40 times  

The gas national

transmission system

operates at pressures

up to 94barg – around

40 times the pressure

of an everyday car tyre. 

We own and operate the gas national transmission system in Great Britain, with day-to-day responsibility for balancing supply and demand. Our network comprises

approximately 7,660 kilometres (4,760 miles) of high pressure pipe and 24 compressor stations. In 2014/15 the gas throughput across the system was over 80 billion cubic metres.

Market context

The UK’s gas market and sources of gas are changing. Domestic demand has fallen over the last five years and a significant increase is not expected in future years. The UK continental shelf (UKCS) now makes up less than half our total gas supply, with

What we’ve achieved in 2014/15

We delivered a strong safety performance, particularly in our operations business where we have achieved 24 months (from April 2013) without a single lost time injury suffered by our employees or contractors.

We reached record levels of compressor availability in our network. Operational availability was at 100% several times during the winter, with an average of 96%. This is

To meet the stricter environmental limits imposed by the Industrial Emissions Directive (IED), our larger gas turbines will need modifying or replacing. We have sought feedback from our stakeholders on the impact of the IED, adapting our proposed solutions in response. This has helped us develop investment options to make sure the network can meet the future needs of our customers and operate as efficiently as possible.

a rise of 7% on the average for winter 2013/14. It follows targeted investment in our fleet of compressors and improvements to our planning process, maintenance and repair methods.

We received £5.7 million from Ofgem following a successful bid in the Network Innovation Competition for designing and building a robotic device that can inspect below-ground pipework at high pressure installations. The device will help us to better assess asset condition, so we can focus expenditure where it is needed, benefiting gas consumers.

Priorities for the year ahead

Safety: Sustain and improve our safety performance by implementing a new safety culture improvement programme across UK Gas Transmission.

Reliability: Build on improvements we have made this year in compressor availability, extending this across other critical assets in our network to further improve the service we deliver to our customers.

Efficiency: Continue improving end-to-end processes and deliver greater value for

LOGO

customers by being more efficient. Where we create additional capacity, we will look to insource some maintenance work and increase specialist pipeline services for customers.

Innovation: Use the innovation opportunities available through the Network Innovation Competition and Network Innovation Allowance funding. This will help us to create value for customers and the industry, and to achieve our RIIO-T1 commitments.

Emissions compliance projects: Continue work on existing emissions compliance projects and secure funding for continued works over the remainder of the RIIO-T1 period and beyond.

LOGO

NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/1529


    Strategic Report

  Principal operationscontinued

  UK Gas Distribution

In focus:

What we do

Ofgem is able to make comparisons across all eight networks. It establishes outputs they are expected to deliver so that we all maintain a safe and reliable network; make a positive contribution to sustainability and protect the environment; provide connections to supply new consumers and support new gas entry points into the network; meet their social obligations; and provide an agreed standard of service to consumers and other stakeholders.

We collaborate with the industry on issues that are common to all networks and customers, such as innovation, safety and the future of networks to deliver outcomes that customers value.

Gas remains an important part of the current and future energy mix and we are working with our customers and stakeholders to develop our networks to accommodate gas from new sources, such as bio-methane.

LOGO

Gas consumption

in our networks was     

260 TWh in 2014/15.

We own and operate four gas distribution networks comprising approximately 131,000 kilometres (82,000 miles) of pipeline. We transport gas from the national transmission system to around

We manage the

National Gas

Emergency number

(0800 111 999) on

behalf of all gas

distribution networks.

10.9 million consumers on behalf of 37 shippers.

Market context

We manage our networks to keep our customers

safe and warm. We are incentivised through RIIO

We handled nearly

2.4 million calls during   

2014/15 across the

emergency number,

enquiry lines,

appliance repair

helpline and meter

enquiry service.

to operate efficiently and deliver services that our customers and stakeholders value.

What we’ve achieved during 2014/15

We believe we are making progress towards our ambition to be the best gas distribution business in Britain by 2017. We understand where we need to

However, against a backdrop of increased customer complaints across the industry, our volumes have also increased. To help improve this, a particular focus this year has been on simplifying the process

focus to deliver our RIIO outputs and deliver better customer service.

We are investing in our networks to make sure we meet customer and stakeholder needs. This includes replacing approximately 1,450 kilometres of old metal pipelines with more durable materials as part of our mains replacement programme developed with the HSE and Ofgem. In London, we have replaced around 300 kilometres of iron mains, including projects in Battersea and around the City.

We have also completed ten commercial bio-methane connections, more than any other UK gas distribution network, including the first 100% food waste plant and the first commercial sewerage connection with Severn Trent Water.

Overall, we have delivered successfully against our targets to deliver world-class levels of safety performance across our combined field workers and contractor workforce. In terms of cable strikes and injuries to members of the public, although we have missed our targets, we have increased our efforts to make improvements. We have also used innovative technology that has helped reduce excavation volumes, so we can minimise disruption. We have also been helping stakeholders such as landowners and the construction industry understand how we protect pipelines and how they can operate safely around them.

During 2014/15, we were recognised by Ofgem as the best performing gas distribution network in understanding our customer and stakeholder needs for the previous year. Our focus in this area has seen over 1,200 fuel poor customers benefiting from an alternative, more affordable method of heating their homes since we have connected them to our gas networks.

for customers who want to connect to our networks by improving our website experience and providing them with a single point of contact.

We have invested in new mobile technology for our field workforce to increase productivity and provide our supervisors with real-time information. This has also helped improve employee engagement scores and the desire to drive better outcomes for our customers; our field workforce now compares favourably with industry benchmarks.

Priorities for the year ahead

Improve our safety performance by further reducing cable strikes, injuries to members of the public and preventing third-party encroachment. This will continue to be an important area of focus.

Continue to use innovative technology to deliver better services that reduce the impact on customers’ bills and minimise disruption caused by our work.

Improve our customers’ experience of planned replacement work projects by working with our partners to improve our processes, data capture and how we communicate and engage with our customers.

Continue to work with government and industry on setting out the vision for the future role of gas in the UK’s energy mix and policies that support this role, while considering how domestic smart meters can create value for customers.

Motivate and equip our workforce with the tools and knowledge they need to deliver the services and outcomes our customers value, while increasing productivity.

    30


LOGO

Capital investment in the pipeline
Connecting to life:
London gas mains replacement
We are investing nearly £1 billion over an eight year period to 2021 in London’s gas distribution network. In particular, we’re replacing and upgrading more than 2,500 kilometres of gas mains. The work will provide vital infrastructure, supporting London’s economic growth by continuing to provide a safe and reliable gas supply.
We own and maintain more than 20,000 kilometres of gas distribution pipeline under London’s streets. Our use of innovative technologies, like Core&Vac keyhole technology, helps us to keep disruption to a minimum, allowing the City to go about its daily business while we improve the network for the future. nationalgrid.com/LondonGasMainsReplacement
NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15
Strategic Report
31


LOGO

A network fit for the future
Connecting to life:
Improved reliability for Aquidneck Island
The electrical system that serves Aquidneck Island, part of the State of Rhode Island, is antiquated and currently stretched to its limits. The forecasted future demand peaks at 167 MW, which is 20 MW more than the current system can deliver. Our customers, like Judy Crosby of Island Books, rely on power for their livelihood. The $93 million Aquidneck Island Reliability Project will bring more reliable power to the nearly 32,000 homes and businesses in Portsmouth, Middletown and Newport.
The project includes two state-of-the-art substations, reconfiguration of two transmission lines, local distribution work, and retirement of five substations on the island. onislandngrid.com
32


Principal operationscontinued

US Regulated

What we do and where we do it

 

LOGO

We jointly own and operate transmission facilities across upstate New York, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island and Vermont. We own and operate electricity distribution networks in upstate New York, Massachusetts and Rhode Island.

 

We ownNational Grid Annual Report and operate gas distribution networks across the northeastern US located in upstate New York, New York City, Long Island, Massachusetts and Rhode Island.

In focus:

Accounts 2015/16
 Financial review 

3.5m

16bn

3.6m

30 TWh

electricity consumers

in New England and upstate New York.

standard cubic metres of

gas that we forecast, plan

for and procure annually.

consumers receive services from our gas distribution networks, including 26,882 new gas heating customers in 2014/15.

of electricity we forecast, plan for and procure annually across three states.

169km

14,355km

15 year PSA

(105 miles) of underground cable,

520 transmission

substations and 644

distribution substations

we operate in New England and upstate New York.

(8,920 miles) of electricity transmission system are owned and operated by National Grid.

We own and operate 50 fossil fuel-powered units on Long Island that together provide approximately 3,800 MW of power under contract to LIPA. Our Power Supply Agreement (PSA) with LIPA is for 3,634 MW of capacity, comprising eight dual fuel (gas/oil-fired) steam units at three sites, 11 dual fuel combustion turbine units, and 27 oil-fired combustion turbine/diesel units. Under a separate contract with LIPA, four dual fuel combustion turbine units provide an additional 160 MW of capacity.

Market context

In the US, regulators are focused on system modernisation and the integration of new distributed energy resources. In 2014 we introduced Connect21, our thinking on advancing America’s natural gas and electricity infrastructure beyond its 20th century limitations, and creating a more customer-centric, resilient, agile, efficient and environmentally sound energy network. We are working with policymakers, customers and stakeholders to transform the energy industry through initiatives such as Grid Mod in Massachusetts, Reforming the Energy Vision (REV) in New York, and Gas and Electric Infrastructure Safety and Reliability (ISR) plans in Rhode Island.

25


    

LOGO

Internal control and risk management

 

NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15The Board is committed to protecting and enhancing our reputation and assets, while safeguarding the interests of our shareholders. It has overall responsibility for the Group’s system of risk management and internal control.  33


Strategic Report

Principle operationscontinued

US Regulated continued

 

Principal risks

As described in the Internal controls and risk management section (pages 38 to 41), we identify, monitor and manage risks at various levels within our Company. The key risks our US business faces are organised into a US regional risk profile which is regularly reviewed by the US senior leadership. The main risk themes currently featured in this profile are:

  our ability to manage data integrity and

    systems improvements required to

    deliver core business processes and

    regulatory requirements;

  our ability to recover costs through

    existing rate-making mechanisms and to

    influence the development of the future

    US utility business model;

  our ability to enhance our US business

    structure and end-to-end processes to

    support an evolved jurisdictional

    performance environment; and

  safety performance and network

    reliability, security and resilience.

What we’ve achieved

During 2014/15, we delivered a solid performance and continued with high levels of investment in our networks. As described on pages 18 and 19, we achieved our reliability KPI targets but we still have work to do if we are to improve our customer satisfaction target scores.

We finally completed the stabilisation work on our new enterprise resource planning system. This fixed a number of long-standing problems, such as inefficient payroll processing, which had previously required expensive manual interventions. Long term, the data we can produce with the new systems are an essential foundation to the future performance improvements and regulatory filings that we need for profitable growth in the US.

In 2010, the Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities (MADPU) approved a power purchase agreement between National Grid and Cape Wind for a proposed large-scale, offshore wind farm in Nantucket Sound. In 2014, Cape Wind did not satisfy certain critical milestone deadlines set out in the power purchase agreement and did not post collateral to extend the deadlines in the power purchase agreement. As a result, the power purchase agreement was terminated in January of 2015. We continue to believe the solution to New England’s energy challenge is a diversity of energy sources, which is why we support renewable projects consistent with our goal of reducing emissions while minimising the cost impact on our customers.

In a joint programme with Earth Networks, we purchased 55 Weatherbug stations to donate to our communities in Massachusetts, New York and Rhode Island. These stations provide customers with more localised weather information and we use them to better prepare for and respond to storms. They also contribute to STEM education in giving free real-time local weather data to schools and emergency responders.

We continue to invest more in reinforcing the electricity distribution system and also in replacing

gas mains. The NYPSC approved $414 million gas infrastructure investment in Long Island to speed up the replacement of ageing pipe and extend the use of natural gas to more customers.

The NYPSC also published the results of the regulatory audit of our New York gas companies. These audits are a regular feature of the New York regulatory process. The audit was broadly supportive of our performance and structure and, as is usual, made some recommendations for further improvement. It specifically recommended stronger local leadership and a number of more cost-effective and customer-focused operational enhancements. We have responded with an implementation plan to provide these benefits on behalf of New York customers.

Last year, regulatory audits in New York also identified an unacceptable number of violations of the regulations relating to our gas operations. To improve our regulatory compliance performance, we are investing in compliance monitoring systems, adding compliance personnel, and enhancing our training and safety protocols.

Our regulators and customers have heightened expectations around safety and compliance for all gas utilities. We are committed to doing everything we can to meet their expectations and making sure sufficient resources are dedicated to support this priority.

Building on performance improvements in 2013/14, we saw a reduction in safety incidents in 2014/15. In the past year, there has been a 7% reduction in the number of injuries requiring medical attention and a 26% reduction in the number of cases requiring employees to stay out of work. These reductions result from programmes and initiatives based on risk areas, improved incident investigations and root cause analysis. There is still much work to do as we strive for zero injuries. Soft tissue injury prevention, safety observations, road traffic collisions and slips, trips and falls will remain a focus for us in 2015/16.

Each of our jurisdictions has projects under way to develop economic and environmental health in three ways: by driving economic growth; providing cleaner energy; and advancing innovative technologies. We have highlighted some of our 2014/15 achievements below.

Massachusetts

We are preparing to file a grid modernisation plan – a blueprint for the modernisation of the electric system – with MADPU in August 2015.

We have announced plans to build, own, and operate an additional 16 MW of solar generation, bringing total solar capabilities in the state to 21 MW.

As of late 2014, we had installed 39.9 miles of new gas mains and added more than 8,400 new natural gas customers.

  Our Sustainability Hub

  in Worcester, MA.

LOGO

        34


LOGO

New York

We are helping to shape new energy policy in the state through our REV filings. REV is aimed at transforming the electricity energy industry and regulatory practices in New York State.

We are adding new electricity capacity and infrastructure to RiverBend, Buffalo, a former industrial brownfield that is bringing growth and jobs to the state. Companies including Solar City and Soraa will bring investment, much needed jobs, and new and advanced energy technologies that could make this region a hub for energy development regionally, nationally and internationally.

We are negotiating a power purchase agreement with ReEnergy under which we intend to purchase excess energy from a 55 MW biomass generating facility at Fort Drum in Watertown. This will be the largest renewable energy project in the history of the US Army.

We have begun a two year plan to replace ageing pipes and expand the use of natural gas on Long Island and the Rockaway Peninsula to more than 20,000 new customers. This accelerates the replacement of ageing pipes from the current 50-mile requirement to 95 miles by 2016.

We are partnering with New York City to accelerate the phase out of heavy oils in around 800 buildings. Since the programme’s launch in 2011, we have converted over 500 heavy oil buildings. We continue our efforts to convert the few remaining clean heat eligible buildings on Staten Island.

Rhode Island

The $93 million Aquidneck Island Reliability Project, known as OnIsland, will bring more reliable power to the nearly 32,000 homes and businesses in Portsmouth, Middletown, and Newport. The project includes two substations, reconfiguration of two transmission lines, local distribution work, and retirement of five substations on the island.

We have been working with Toray Plastics, one of the largest employers in the state, on customised energy solutions. In 2014 the company opened its second cogeneration system at its 70-acre campus in North Kingstown and we supported them with an energy efficiency incentive of $15.9 million.

We are building a new state-of-the-art substation to replace the existing ageing infrastructure at the current South Street Substation, which powers downtown Providence. This coincides with a $206 million redevelopment of South Street Landing that will turn the vacant former South Street Power Station into teaching and administrative space for Brown University, Rhode Island College and the University of Rhode Island.

FERC

We are part of a joint venture to form New York Transco. This aims to construct, own, and operate incremental electric transmission assets in New York State to improve reliability and reduce congestion.

It is initially pursuing five projects that support public policy objectives and provide broad-based benefits across the state. New York Transco filed with FERC in December 2014 for rate recovery and cost allocation for proposed transmission projects, estimated at $1.7 billion.

We have joined Spectra Energy’s $3 billion proposed Access Northeast pipeline project that aims to significantly increase natural gas capacity to generators in New England. Our three New England electric distribution companies have established memoranda of understanding with project developers to explore the development of an innovative tariff that would enable them to take capacity from the pipeline and release it into the market as needed to mitigate wholesale electricity price spikes.

In December 2014, we announced we had joined forces with Anbaric Transmission to develop large-scale HVDC transmission projects to deliver a combination of domestic wind energy and Canadian hydropower to New England load centres. We are currently developing a 1,000 MW hybrid land and sea HVDC project from northern Maine to Greater Boston and a 400 MW underground HVDC project from upstate New York to Vermont under Lake Champlain.

We are working with Eversource Energy in implementing the Greater Boston and New Hampshire Solution to address critical grid reliability needs. We will be investing approximately $190 million in the Solution for new infrastructure in southern New Hampshire, northern Massachusetts, and the Greater Boston area. We expect the Solution to be in service by 2019.

Priorities for the year ahead

We continue our Connect21 journey with these four priorities for 2015/16: Performance Excellence; local operating model; talent and capabilities; and future energy networks.

Performance Excellence: We will improve the way we work as teams to become more efficient, innovative, and responsive to our customers’ needs in end-to-end processes that include: meter to cash; emergency response; deliver gas and electric; maintain gas and electric; and operate gas and electric.

Local operating model: We will continue to drive greater accountability and customer service by delivering the services and obligations expected by the 14 operating companies and four jurisdictions that comprise our US business – at a cost and performance level agreed upon by each jurisdiction’s management team.

Talent and capabilities: We will provide employees with the tools and resources they need to achieve the performance measures required by our customers and shareholders.

Future energy networks: We will update and create new electricity and gas networks through design, operational, and regulatory innovations.

  LOGO

  Upgrading the power

  lines in Rhode Island.

LOGO

      NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/201535              


    Strategic Report

  Principal operationscontinued

  Other activities

In focus:

Grain LNGtimescale). Intraday markets help

14.9%

Approximate

percentage of UK gas

from LNG imports, up    

from 9.7% in 2013/14.

Grain LNG is one of three LNG importation facilities in the UK. It operates under long-term contracts with customers and provides importation services of ship berthing, temporary storage and re-gasification in to the national transmission system.

This year, we have continued to explore

market participants adjust their positions better over short time periods.

Metering

National Grid Metering (NGM) provides installation and maintenance services to energy suppliers in the regulated market

developments to our LNG services to increasein Great Britain. It maintains an asset
revenue, including the potential to offer shipbase of around 14.1 million domestic,
reloading.industrial and commercial meters.

We have started a ship cool-down service. This process helps ships that have been out of service or having maintenance to reload full LNG cargo.

In 2015/16, we will also commission and launch our LNG road tanker loading facility. This will provide tankered LNG to off-grid customers and operators of heavy goods vehicles.

Interconnectors

The England-France interconnector (IFA) is a 2,000 MW HVDC link between the French and British transmission systems with ownership shared between National Grid and Réseau de Transport d’Electricité. The interconnector’s availability continued to improve this year following a significant valve replacement programme. Average availability for 2014/15 was 90.62%, up from 83.84% in 2013/14. A substantial proportion of the flow continues to be in the import direction, from France to Great Britain.

BritNed is a joint venture between National Grid and TenneT, the Dutch transmission system operator. It owns and operates a 1,000 MW HVDC link between England and the Netherlands. As with IFA, a substantial proportion of the flow is in the import direction from the Netherlands to Great Britain.

Throughout 2014/15, both IFA and BritNed have operated as part of the North West Europe market region. The creation of this region is part of the ongoing development of the EU’s Internal Energy Market. IFA and BritNed have entered this region voluntarily ahead of the introduction of new EU-wide rules for cross-border electricity trading.

IFA and BritNed are also involved in the next phase of this regional market that will cover the intraday market timescale (currently it only covers the day ahead

The domestic traditional gas metering business continues to operate in its role as the National Metering Manager, pending the start of the smart metering mass roll-out. This role means customers have a point of contact if they require a meter up until the start of the smart metering roll-out. Tariff caps agreed with Ofgem as part of this role, which took effect on 1 April 2014, will continue to apply until at least the end of the transition to smart metering.

Customer satisfaction scores for NGM remain positive for both its domestic, and industrial and commercial businesses, but we continue to work with our customers on areas for improvement. In our industrial and commercial business we have implemented new software that allows remote customer self-serve access for some services and is expected to improve efficiency. We are also responding to the rapidly changing non-domestic sector by exploring additional products and services.

UK Property

National Grid Property is responsible in the UK for the management, clean-up and disposal of surplus sites, most of which are former gas works. During 2014/15, we entered into a joint venture with the Berkeley Group, known as ‘St William’, to develop surplus land for residential use in London and the South East. We have also sold 42 sites and exchanged on several high-profile land disposal agreements with joint venture partners. Our holder demolition and contaminated land clean-up programmes are progressing well, and we are in the process of retendering our estate management outsourcing agreement.

Xoserve

Xoserve delivers transactional services on behalf of all the major gas network transportation companies in Great Britain, including National Grid. Xoserve is

LOGO

jointly owned by National Grid, as majority shareholder, and the other gas distribution network companies. Xoserve celebrated its 10 year anniversary as a company on 1 May 2015.

US non-regulated businesses

Some of our US businesses are not subject to state or federal rate-making authority. These include interests in some of our LNG road transportation, some gas transmission pipelines (our minority equity interests in these are not regulated) and certain commercial services relating to solar installations, fuel cells and other new technologies.

Corporate activities

Corporate activities comprise central overheads, Group insurance and expenditure incurred on business development.

     36


LOGO


    Strategic Report

  Internal control and risk management

  The Board is committed to protecting and enhancing our reputation and assets,

  while safeguarding the interests of our shareholders. It has overall responsibility

  for the Company’s system of risk management and internal control.

National Grid is exposed to a variety of uncertainties that could have a material adverse effect on the Company’sGroup’s financial condition, our operational results, our reputation, and the value and liquidity of our shares.

 

The Board oversees risk management, and, as part of this role, it reviews the main elements of our process and sets and monitors risk appetite. Risk appetite establishes the amount of uncertaintyrisk the Company mayis prepared to seek or accept at any given time whenin pursuing our strategic objectives.

objectives (our risk appetite). The Board also regularly monitors and reviews our internal controls and risk management processes. You can read more about this on page 29.

This year specific consideration was given towe refined our risk management processes as a result of changes implemented by the guidance in the new UK Corporate Governance Code 2014 (the New Code) which applies. Most notably, we now specifically test the impact of our principal risks on a reasonable worst case basis, alone and in clusters, over a five-year assessment period. The aim of this is to establish their impact on the CompanyGroup’s ability to continue operating and meet its liabilities over the assessment period. The reason for selecting a five-year assessment period and the results of this exercise are described in the next fiscal year and refinements to our processes will be introduced, as appropriate, over the coming year.viability statement on page 30.

 

Risk management approach

Our Company-wideGroup-wide corporate risk management process provides a framework through which we can consistently identify, assess and prioritise, manage, monitor and report risks, as shown in the diagram below. The process is designed to support the delivery of our vision and strategy, as described on pages 14 and 15.16–17.

 

Our process involves a continuous cycle of bottom-up review and reporting and top-down review and feedback.

 

All our business functions participate in the bottom-up risk management process. They identify the main risks to our business model and to achieving their business objectives

and the actions being taken to manage and monitor them. They assess each risk by considering the potential ‘worst case credible’ financial and reputational impacts, and how likely the risk is to materialise. The identified risks we identify are collated in risk registers and are reported at functional and regional levels of the Company.Group. The risk registers also describe the adequacy of our existing risk controls.

 

An important feature of our risk management process is that eachour three lines of defence model. Each business function owns and is responsible for managing its own particular risks.risks (the first line of defence). A central risk management team (the second line of defence) acts as an advisory function and also provides independent challenge and review. This team partners with the business functions through nominated risk liaisons and collaborates with assurance teams and specialists, such as safety and compliance management. Our internal audit function then audits selected controls and compliance management, to sense check risk information.mitigation activities (the third line of defence).

 

Regional senior management regularly reviewreviews and debatedebates the outputs of the bottom-up risk management process and agreeagrees the prioritisation of the risks. The main risks for the UK and US businesses are highlighted in regional risk profiles and reported to the Chief Executive through quarterly performance reports. An overview of current risk themes for the UK and US businesses is provided on pages 27 and 34 respectively.CEO.

 

Our main strategic uncertainties or ‘principal risks’ for the Company are developed through top-down discussionsdiscussing the Group risk profile with the Executive leadership team.team and the Board. These risks are reported and debated with the Executive Committee and Audit CommitteeBoard every six months.

 

The Board participates in an annual risk workshopworkshops to make sure that the principal risks remain closely aligned to our strategic aims and that no important risks (or combination of risks) are being overlooked. In addition, the Board considers emerging risks (uncertainties that are still developing and sit outside theThis year, several sessions were conducted to discuss our principal risks profile) together with our strategy team’s annual long-term update.and to assess the potential of those risks to impact the Company’s

Risk management process

Feedback and reporting

LOGOLOGO

26National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Strategic Report


   Strategic Report

viability over the next five years. Through the testing and review process we decided to adopt two new principal risks in relation to emerging technology and the potential impact of sustained inflation and deflation in the US and UK respectively.

 

The outcomes from each level of the risk review process are fed back to the relevant teams and incorporated as appropriate into the next cycle of our ongoing process as shown below.on page 26.

Risk management process

LOGO

Feedback and reporting

LOGO

    38


 

Our principal risks

Accepting that it is not possible to identify, anticipate or eliminate every risk that may arise and that risk is an inherent part of doing business, our risk management process aims to provide reasonable assurance that we understand, monitor and manage the main uncertainties that we face in delivering our objectives.

 

This includes consideration of inherent risks, which exist because of the nature of day-to-day operations in our industry, and financial risks, which exist because of our financing activities. The principal risks we face are provided below. An overview of the key inherent risks we face isare provided on pages 173 to 176,

183–186, as well as an overview of our key financial risks, which isare incorporated within the Notes to our consolidated financial statements on pages 94102 to 158.167.

 

Our corporate risk profile contains the principal risks that the Board considers to be the main uncertainties currently faced byfacing the CompanyGroup as we endeavour to achieve our strategic objectives. AnWe have provided an overview of these risks is provided below, together with examples of the relevant controls and current mitigating actions we are taking.

Strategic objective

 

  

Risk description

 

  

Example of mitigations

 

Drive growth

LOGO

  

Failure to identify and execute the right opportunities to deliver our growth strategy.

 

Failure to sufficiently grow our core business and have viable options for new business over the longer term would negativelyadversely affect the Group’s credibility and jeopardise the achievement of intended financial returns.

 

Our ability to achieve our ambition for growth is subject to a wide range of external uncertainties, including the availability of potential investment targets and attractive financing and the impact of competition for onshore transmission in both the UK and US; and internal uncertainties, such as the performance of our operating businesses and our business planning model assumptions.

 

  

 We regularly monitor and analyse market conditions, competitors and their potential strategies, the advancement and proliferation of new energy technologies, as well as the performance of our Group portfolio. We are also looking to access new sources of finance and capabilities through partnering.

 We have internal processes for reviewing and approving investments in new businesses, disposals of existing ones and organic growth investment opportunities. These processes are reviewed regularly to make sure our approach supports our short- and long-term strategies. We undertake due diligence exercises on investment or partnering opportunities and carry out post-investment reviews to make sure we learn lessons for the future.

  

LOGO

Sustained deflation/inflation in the UK/US.

Sustained deflation in the UK would result in a loss of inflationary indexation of UK RIIO networks’ RAV. In the US our asset base is not indexed by inflation, therefore higher inflation erodes value even if our cost of service is periodically updated through rate case filings.

 

  

The primary measures we have to manage this risk include our business planning process (five-year plan approved each year by the Board), annual portfolio review by the Board, financing strategies (including hedging policies approved by the Finance Committee) and regulatory strategies (e.g. US rate case filing schedule).

 

Engage externally

LOGO

  

InabilityFailure to secure satisfactory regulatory outcomes/ failure to influence future energy policy.

 

Policy decisions by regulators, governments and others directly affect our business. We must engage widely in the energy policy debate, making sure our position and perspective help to shape future policy direction.

  In the UK, we are continuing to work closely with DECC and Ofgem on Electricity Market Reform (EMR) plans. We successfully implemented the first Capacity Market Auction and Contracts for Difference Allocation process and are working with the Regulator to finalise the enduring EMR Business Plan to ensure we continue to deliver value under RIIO. We continue to maintain strong relationships with government, engage in consultations, and develop comprehensive stakeholder communication plans. The Board is also continuing to monitor the increasing public debate around the cost, availability, security and sustainability of UK energy supplies.

In the US, we are engaging our external stakeholders about the role of the utility company of the future, under the banner of Connect21. We believe this conversation will help shape the regulatory and fiscal regime in the US in the future. Regulatory proceedings related to utility of the future have been launched in New York (Reforming the Energy Vision) and Massachusetts (Grid Modernization) and our Connect21 aligns well with them. We are continuing to strengthen our jurisdictional focus and are improving our rate case filing capabilities so our businesses can continue to earn a fair and reasonable rate of return. Our rate filings include structural changes where appropriate, such as revenue decoupling mechanisms, capital trackers, commodity-related bad debt true-ups and pension and other post-employment benefit true-ups, as described on pages 169 and 172.

LOGO

We maintain and monitor a reputation ‘watch list’ at both Company and regional levels to support awareness and proactive management of issues that could cause us reputational harm.

LOGO

        NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/1539


     Strategic Report

   Internal control and risk managementcontinued

Strategic objective

 

  

In both the UK and the US we strive to maintain a good understanding of the regulatory agenda and emerging issues, so that robust, public interest aligned responses can be selected and developed in good time. Our reputation as a competent operator of important national infrastructure is critical to our ability to do this.

Risk description

 

Example of mitigations

Engage our people

LOGO

  

InabilityFailure to secure the businessskills and leadership capacity appropriate leadership capability and employee engagement levels(including effective succession planning) required to deliver our vision and strategy.

 

It is through the high-quality work of our employees that we will achieve our vision, respond to the changing needs of our stakeholders and create a competitive advantage. Obtaining and fostering an engaged and talented team that has the knowledge, training, skills and experience to deliver on our strategic objectives is vital to our success. We must attract, integrate and retain the talent we need at all levels of the business.

  

Strategic workforce planning allows us to effectively inform our strategic resourcing plans.

 

 We have identifiedOur entry level talent development schemes (graduate training and apprenticeships) are a potential source of competitive advantage in the core capabilities that align with our strategic ambition and defined our set of leadership standards.market place.

 We have filled key leadership roles with a mixImprovements to our talent processes mean that we are now much better at identifying talent and accelerating development of internal and external hires.future leaders (e.g. our Accelerated Development Programme).

 The rigour of our succession planning and development planning process has been improved, particularly at senior levels and is now being applied deeper into the organisation.

We are involved in a number of initiatives to help secure the future engineering talent required (see page 24)44).

 We continue to develop our succession plans for key roles, including leadership.

  We continue to actively promote inclusion and diversity.

 We monitor employee engagement and formally solicit employee opinions via a Company-wideGroup-wide employee survey annually.

 National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Internal control and risk management27


Internal control and risk managementcontinued

LOGO

Strategic objective

 

  

Deliver operational excellence

Failure to achieve levels of financial performance required to meet regulatory requirements.

The Group operates under a number of regulatory regimes and we must maintain the performance levels required. Failure to achieve the agreed returns could damage our reputation and threaten future growth opportunities and regulatory arrangements.

  We have a US strategy focused on safety and reliability, customer responsiveness, stewardship and cost competitiveness. Performance measures are tracked and reported monthly. US jurisdictional presidents continue to develop strong relationships with local regulators and communities. A Performance Excellence framework is firmly established to deliver sustainable and innovative performance improvements.

  The UK operating model implemented in 2013 to support our performance under RIIO is now established and we continue to roll out our Performance Excellence framework across the business. We actively engage with local communities and non-governmental actors.

  We monitor network reliability and customer satisfaction as KPIs, as described on pages 18 and 19.Risk description

 

  

Example of mitigations

Deliver

operational excellence

LOGO

  

Failure to deliver appropriate information systems and data integrity.

 

The Company is increasingly reliant on technology to support and maintain our business-critical processes. We must be able to rely on the performance of these systems and the underlying data to demonstrate the value of our business to our shareholders, and to meet our obligations under our regulatory agreements, and comply with agreements with bond holders and other providers of finance.

  

 We implementedFollowing the implementation of a new US enterprise resource planning system at the end of 2012. After2012, we undertook a significant effort to combat programme difficulties, thedifficulties. This system is now stabilised and enhancements to drive business value are under way.have been successfully implemented throughout 2015.

 Over the financial year we have implemented improved project management practices for IS projects.

 We are undertaking a programmehave taken action to strengthen identified weaknesses in US controls over financial reporting.bring back in-house knowledge of critical systems, processes and data.

 We are implementing a global information management framework focusing on data integrity and security.have rebuilt the US Program Delivery organisation, to build back programme delivery skills.

 We completed a data assurance programme last year and actionsGlobally, our Information Management Framework is being rolled out to improve data management.

 Data and its effective management is also central to our data quality and integrity processes based oncompliance action plan, which is being rolled out across the results are being managed by the business functions.Group.

 

  

 

We experience a catastrophic/major cyber security breach.

 

Due to the nature of our business we recognise that our critical national infrastructure (CNI) systems may be a potential target for cyber threats. We must protect our business assets and infrastructure and be prepared for any malicious attack.

  

We use industry best practices as part of our cyber security policies, processes and technologies.

 Our cyber security programme is a global programme of work which started in 2010 and continues to be modified and updated to this day. This programme is intended to reduce the risk that a cyber threat could adversely affect the Company’s business resilience.

We continually invest in cyber strategies that are commensurate with the changing nature of the security landscape. This includes collaborative working with DECC and the Centre for Protection of National Infrastructure (CPNI) on key cyber risks and development of an enhanced CNI security strategy and our involvement in the US with developing the National Institute of Standards and Technology Cyberspace Security Framework.

 

LOGO

  

 

Failure to prevent a significant process safety event.Catastrophic asset failure.

 

Safety is paramount. Some of the assets ownedthat we own and operated by National Gridoperate are inherently hazardous and process safety incidents, whilstwhile extremely unlikely, canmay occur.

  

 We continue to commit significant resources and financial investment to maintain the integrity of our assets and we strive to continuously improve our key process safety controls.

 We continue to implement our Group-wide process safety management system to ensure a robust and consistent framework of risk management exists across our higher hazard asset portfolio.

 

 We have a mature insurance strategy that uses a mix of self-insurance, captives and direct (re)insurance placements. This provides some financial protection in respect of property damage, business interruption and liability risks. Periodically, independent surveys of key assets are undertaken, which provide risk engineering knowledge and best practices to the Group with the aim to further reduce our exposure to hazard risks.

  

 

     40We fail to effectively respond to the threats and opportunities presented by emerging technology, particularly the challenge of adapting our networks to meet the challenges of increasing distributed energy resources.  


 We have relaunched our dedicated Group Technology Team within the Strategy Function.

 

 We undertake biannual reviews and briefings of emerging trends and developments and their implications for the Company with the Board.

 

 

28National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Strategic Report


Strategic objective

Risk description

Example of mitigations

 

 

Deliver operational excellencecontinued   Strategic Report

 

LOGO

 

Our objective is to be an industry leader in managing the process safety risks from our assets to protect our employees, contractors and the communities in which we operate. We operate in compliance with local legislation and regulation. In addition we identify and adopt good practices for safety management.

 

  We are developing a suite of risk models to assess the risk of specific asset types and support targeted investment to reduce risk.

  We monitor a mix of leading and lagging process safety indicators and test the effectiveness of our controls with periodic audits.

 

Our internal control process

We have a number of processes to support our internal control environment. These processes are managed by dedicated specialist teams, including risk management, ethics and compliance management, corporate audit and internal controls, and safety, environment and health. Oversight of these activities is provided through regular review and reporting to the appropriate Board committees as outlined in the Corporate Governance section on pages 42 to 59.46–67.

 

Reviewing the effectiveness of our internal control and risk management

Each year the Board reviews the effectiveness of our internal control systems and risk management processprocesses covering all material systems, including financial, operational and compliance controls, to make sure they remain robust. The latest review covered the financial year to 31 March 20152016 and the period to the approval of this Annual Report and Accounts. It included:

 

 the Certificate of Assurance for notingfrom the CEO to the Board following consideration by the Audit Committee, to providewhich provides overall assurance around the effectiveness of our risk management and internal controls systems;

 where appropriate, assurance from our committees, with particular reference to the reports received from the Audit, and Safety, Environment and Health Committees on reviews undertaken at their meetings; and

 assurances about the certifications required under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 (Sarbanes-Oxley) as a result of our US reporting obligations.

 

The Board evaluated the effectiveness of management’s processes for monitoring and reviewing internal control and risk management, notingmanagement. It noted that no significant failings or weaknesses had been identified by the review and confirmed that it was satisfied the systems and processes were functioning effectively.

Our internal control and risk management processes comply with the Turnbull guidance on internal control and the requirements of the UK Corporate Governance Code and the Financial Reporting

Council’s Guidance on Risk Management, Internal Control and Related Financial and Business Reporting.

Code. They are also the basis of our compliance with obligations set by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 and other internal assurance activities. The New Code, published in September 2014, contained changes related to risk management. These changes have been reviewed against our risk management and internal control systems and processes. Refinements will be implemented, as appropriate, over the coming year.

 

Internal control over financial reporting

We have specific internal mechanisms to govern the financial reporting process and the preparation of the Annual Report and Accounts. Our financial controls guidance sets out the fundamentals of internal control over financial reporting, which are applied across the Company.

 

Our financial processes include a range of system, transactional and management oversight controls. In addition, our businesses prepare detailed monthly management reports that include analysis of their results, along with comparisons to relevant budgets, forecasts and prior year results. These are presented to, and reviewed by, senior management within our Finance function.

 

These reviews are supplemented by quarterly performance reviews, attended by the Chief ExecutiveCEO and Finance Director whichDirector. These reviews consider historical results and expected future performance and involve senior management from both operational and financial areas of the business.

Each month, the Finance Director presents a consolidated financial report to the Board.

 

As part of our assessment of financial controls in the prior year,previous years, we identified a number of weaknesses in our US financial control framework. We are making progress in remediating these weaknesses. For more information, including our opinion on internal control over financial reporting, see page 173.183.

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Internal control and risk management29


Viability statement

The Board’s consideration of the longer-term viability of the Company is an extension of our business planning process, which includes financial forecasting, a robust risk management assessment, regular budget reviews and scenario planning. This activity is strengthened by a culture throughout the Company of review and challenge. Our vision and business strategy aim to make sure that our operations are sustainable and our finances are sustainable and robust.

As part of National Grid’s risk appetite framework, each year the Board reviews our target risk appetite levels and reflects on whether our decision-making behaviours over the past year have aligned with these targets. The Board confirmed that the Company’s behaviours over the past year had been in line with our target risk appetite.

We believe that five years is the most appropriate timeframe over which the Board should assess the long-term viability of the Company. The following factors have been taken into account in making this decision:

1.  We have reasonable clarity over a five-year period, allowing an appropriate assessment of our principal risks to be made;

2.  The Board considered whether there are specific, foreseeable risk events relating to the principal risks that are likely to materialise within a five to ten year period, and which might be substantial enough to affect the Company’s viability and therefore should be taken into account when setting the assessment period. No risks of this sort were identified; and

3.  It matches our business planning cycle.

We have set out the details of the principal risks facing our Company on pages 26 to 29, described in relation to our ability to deliver our strategic objectives. We identify our principal risks through a robust assessment that includes a continuous cycle of bottom-up reporting and review, and top-down feedback and horizon scanning. Through this assessment, priorities are elevated appropriately and transparently. This process is described in more detail on pages 26 to 27.

Over the course of the year the Board has also considered the following specific areas of our principal risks in detail:

  

The Board has considered the proposed sale of a majority share in our UK Gas Distribution business and has concluded that it will not have an adverse impact on the viability of the Company. It will continue to assess the strategic risks that the proposed sale presents when considering the approval of the transaction.

The Board has discussed the potential financial and reputational impact of the principal risks against our ability to deliver the Company’s business plan. This describes and tests the significant solvency and liquidity risks involved in delivering our strategic objectives within our business model.

The Board has also reviewed the stress testing of the principal risks. The Board started by considering our reputational and financial risk capacity. It then considered how that capacity might be tested by the principal risks. Each of the principal risks was tested for its individual impact based on assessing reasonable worst case scenarios over a five-year period, and considering reputational impacts and financial impacts (to the nearest £500m). The figure of £500m was selected because our financial risk capacity is very substantial and the Board was satisfied that this figure was appropriate in the context of an exercise aimed at testing threats to viability.

In addition to testing individual principal risks, the Board also considered the impact of a cluster of the principal risks materialising over the assessment period. They focused on the effect these could have on our reputation and stakeholder trust and how that could impact our business.

In assessing the impact of the principal risks on the Company, the Board has considered the fact that we operate in stable markets and the robust financial position of the Group, including the ability to sell assets, raise capital and suspend or reduce the payment of dividends. It has also considered Ofgem’s legal duty to have regard for the need to fund licenced National Grid Gas plc and National Grid Electricity Transmission plc activities.

Each Director was satisfied that they had sufficient information to judge the viability of the Company. Based on the assessment described above and on page 27, the Directors have a reasonable expectation that the Company will be able to continue operating and meet its liabilities over the period to May 2021.

 

 

Principal risk

Matters considered by the Board

Securing satisfactory regulatory outcomes and influencing future energy policy.

Updates and reviews of:

     the regulatory situation in the US (including the position with our rate case filings);

     the impact of the UK General Election on our business;

     our regulatory position in the UK, including our RIIO mid-period review strategy;

     the impact of the introduction of onshore competition in the UK;

     the future of our System Operator and Transmission Owner roles;

     the possible impact of greater European integration of energy markets; and

     the potential impact of Brexit on our business.

Failure to deliver appropriate information systems and reliable data.

An update on our global IS systems.

We experience a catastrophic/major cyber breach.

An update on cyber security risks and a review of critical questions to be addressed.

Failure to respond effectively to the threats and opportunities presented by emerging technology, particularly the challenge of adapting our networks to meet the challenges of increasing distributed energy resources.

Failure to identify and execute the right opportunities to deliver our growth strategy.

A Board review of our US business and consideration of potential investment opportunities. Two Board strategy sessions to consider our growth strategy and looking at emerging technology and other industry developments.

30National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Strategic Report


   Strategic Report

LOGO

In focus

Safety performance

7,700+

employees and contractors completed a driver safety programme on the risk of distractions while driving

Our networks

We continue to invest in new infrastructure and update our existing networks to deliver energy safely and reliably to our customers.

KPIspages 18–21

Electricity Transmission

page 32

Gas Transmission

page 33

Gas Distribution

page 37

Innovation

We secured over

£22m

of funding for three major innovative projects. Read more about how this will be invested on pages 32–37

When I look at the different aspects of the UK’s energy landscape, it seems that one factor is a constant. Whether it’s the sources of energy, or regulatory and government policy developments, or the expectations of customers and industry stakeholders, the common factor that emerges is change.

For us at National Grid, a large part of our success depends on our ability to keep pace with it and adapt to it.

This year we’ve seen significant regulatory developments. Ofgem launched a consultation on extending competition in electricity transmission. We support this work and recognise that introducing competition is a good way to deliver value for consumers, if the right conditions are met. We outlined this in our response and will continue to use our experience to make sure a thorough assessment is undertaken before any change is finalised.

We have also been working alongside DECC and Ofgem to consider how to evolve the current SO model, to make it more flexible and more independent while remaining cost effective. In doing so, it is vital that there is no disruption to the pivotal role National Grid plays as SO in keeping the energy market working.

In May 2016, Ofgem announced a mid-period review of the RIIO-T1 price control looking at three specific output measures in gas and electricity transmission. The scope of this review is narrow with no changes to key financial parameters. Ofgem will now run a consultation process this summer, with any changes to be implemented in April 2017.

We’ve seen significant change inside the Company too. In November 2015 we announced our plans to commence a process to sell a majority stake in our Gas Distribution business. Since then we have been working on how we separate Gas Distribution from National Grid and create a stand-alone business ready for sale; making sure it has the right people, assets, systems and technology it needs to be successful in the future.

Set against all these developments, I’m delighted that our UK businesses have continued to perform well during the last year with continued world class safety levels and network reliability, as well as further developing our interconnector businesses with two new projects. You can read more about our UK operating highlights over the next six pages.

We can’t be complacent though. If we are to be trusted to provide a safe and reliable service today, to deliver a clean and sustainable future for energy, and to deliver on our promises to customers, we need to improve our performance.

This is why performance has been such an important area of focus for our UK businesses during 2015/16 – and it remains a priority for the year ahead, as you can read below.

Looking ahead to 2016/17

The coming year promises to be a challenge as we continue to respond and adapt to change across our businesses. Our priorities are very clear. We will create and subsequently sell a majority stake in a stand-alone Gas Distribution business and continue to work externally to influence future regulatory changes, while meeting the ever-changing needs of our stakeholders.

It’s important for us to be prepared for the possible introduction of competition in electricity transmission, that our people understand its implications, and that we are ready to review and respond to the mid-period review consultation. I am confident that as a business we will be ready for these changes.

At the same time we will continue our drive to improve performance, and make sure we develop a high performance culture to serve our customers as best we can.

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Principal operations31


Principal operations

Electricity Transmission We own and manage the electricity transmission system in England and Wales. Our networks comprise approximately 7,200 kilometres (4,470 miles) of overhead line, 1,500 kilometres (932 miles) of underground cable and 338 substations.

LOGO

Market context

Although demand for electricity is generally increasing around the world, in the UK it is expected to remain broadly flat over the next five to 10 years.

Changes in the sources and characteristics of generation connecting to our network, such as wind and nuclear generation, mean we need to respond by developing the way we balance and operate our network to accommodate these sources.

Over the last two years, some generators have delayed their connection dates to the network and this means our future investment profile for electricity transmission is flatter than in previous years. However, we are ready to respond to connection dates when we need to. We will continue to renew our network to deliver the network reliability our customers require as efficiently as possible.

What we’ve achieved in 2015/16

The overall reliability of supply for our transmission system in 2015/16 was 99.999998%.

We have delivered an excellent safety performance; our safest year on record. Our lost time injury rate reduced by over 60% and our high potential incident rate fell by nearly 10%. We have focused on our key risk areas, such as safe driving and working at height and continue to work with our contractors to share best practice in safety management.

Following a seven year period of consultation, community engagement and planning applications we received a development consent order (DCO) for the construction of a new transmission circuit to connect the nuclear power station at Hinkley Point. To connect the power station to the network we will be removing existing pylons and constructing new overhead lines, undergrounding and using the award-winning T-Pylon.

Working with the stakeholder advisory group we have identified and recommended four projects to receive funding from the Visual Impact Provision project. These projects are in National Parks and Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty across England and Wales and we have now started feasibility studies to review the existing overhead lines and develop proposals that will help further enhance these areas.

The North West Coast Connection Project continues to progress and maintain engagement with a broad range of stakeholders. This includes holding community information events along the preferred route corridor and meeting government officials, local authorities and focus groups to build support for the statutory formal consultation.

We have developed a mobile application which allows our operations teams to provide instant feedback on supplier performance. This is designed to save time, improve supplier performance and reduce costs in our supply chain, helping to deliver further value for consumers.

Priorities for the year ahead

Change: prepare for the potential challenge of increased competition in the transmission market, making sure we can deliver for our customers in both competitive and monopoly markets.

Programme delivery: increase the amount of work we can deliver, and reduce our costs through improving processes.

Operational efficiency: continue our drive for efficiency so we can improve productivity.Project delivery: complete delivery of key projects such as the London Power Tunnels.

Safety: maintain our world class safety performance.

In focus

Electricity transmitted across our network

253,981

(GWh)

LOGO

Circuit breaker replacement programme

We have piloted a new approach to circuit breakers aiming to halve the time and cost of our replacements over the RIIO-T1 period. Completing additional condition assessments and interface engineering allows our new high voltage circuit breakersto be installed on top of existing structures, saving more than four weeks of time. We expect this new innovative approach to reduce ourRIIO-T1 costs by more than £100m.

We were granted a £12 million award from this year’s Network Innovation Competition (NIC) which will be used to convert a substation at Deeside into an off-grid research facility. This will replicate a live substation and allow us to test the effects of future low-carbon generation on the network with no risk to security of supply. Once complete this will be the first facility of its kind in Europe.

LOGO

“We are ready to respond to connection dates when we need to”

32National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Strategic Report


   Strategic Report

Gas Transmission We own and manage the gas national transmission system in Great Britain, with day-to-day responsibility to maintain a safe, reliable, and available operation. Our network comprises approximately 7,660 kilometres (4,760 miles) of high pressure pipe and 24 compressor stations. In 2015/16 the gas throughput across the system was more than 80 billion cubic metres.

LOGO

LOGO

What we’ve achieved in 2015/16

We have increased our annual network investment by a further £18 million and maintained excellent levels of network availability throughout the year.

We are committed to safety and are working to improve the fall protection equipment on all our trailers following our first lost time injury in more than two and a half years, when a contractor sustained a minor injury unloading a lorry in December 2015.

We have undertaken a detailed review of our end-to-end processes, focusing on removing waste and increasing value for our customers. One result from this efficiency work has been our ability to increase the volume of in-house maintenance work we deliver. We have also reduced the time we expect to take in connecting customers to the NTS as a result of these process improvements.

We received a further £4.8 million from Ofgem’s NIC to support our customer low-cost connections project. This project will introduce new technology that changes the connections process for customers, making it easier and reducing the cost for new customers to connect to the NTS.

We are investing in our Aylesbury, Huntingdon and Peterborough compressor stations to make sure they comply with the stricter environmental limits set out in the Industrial Emissions Directive (IED). We plan to complete the necessary upgrade works to all our sites affected by this legislation by 2023.

Priorities for the year ahead

Safety: build on, and further improve our safety culture and statistics through a review of our risk management approach.

Reliability: increase the amount of maintenance and replacement work on our assets, in line with our RIIO commitments and develop an improved asset health risk methodology.

Efficiency: improve the quality of data on our assets to enable better decisions on investments and to drive efficiencies in our project work. In response to customer feedback, work to reduce the time taken to connect customers to our network.

Innovation: continue to create value for customers and the wider industry through innovation, development and implementation.

Emissions compliance projects: meet the IED requirements by delivering our agreed asset enhancement and replacement programme.

In focus

X20,000

The gas throughput across the system in 2015/16 was more than 80 billion cubic metres, enough to fill Wembley Stadium more than 20,000 times.

LOGO

Efficient robotics

Our pioneering robotics will negotiate complex pipework, withstanding extreme pressures. By avoiding unnecessary excavations, this technology has the potential to save almost £60 million in 20 years and generate carbon savings of over 2,000 tonnes.

Market context

The UK’s gas market and sources of gas are changing. Domestic demand has fallen over the last five years and a significant increase is not expected in future years. The UK continental shelf (UKCS) now makes up less than half our total gas supply, with the remainder coming from Norway, continental Europe, or further afield via shipped imports of LNG.

Overall, supply capacity now exceeds peak demand by more than 30%, giving our customers significant flexibility over which sources of gas they choose to meet demand. Flexible sources of supply, such as LNG importation terminals, interconnectors and storage sites, can respond to demand more quickly than traditional UKCS supplies. Therefore, our network needs to be able to respond to changing day-to-day and within-day supply and demand patterns.

We also need to prepare for an uncertain energy landscape in the long term. UK reliance on imported gas supplies will vary depending on the level of gas supply from the UKCS and the development of indigenous gas sources.

We are working closely with our customers and stakeholders to meet these operational challenges. We are focused on continuing to develop our network and services to meet their needs safely, reliably and efficiently.

     
 

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Principal operations33


LOGO

34National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Strategic Report 


 

 

The   Strategic Report was approved by

LOGO

“We play a leading role in helping develop the Board of Directors on 20 May 2015 and signed on its behalf by:UK’s future energy strategy”

LOGO

 

Alison KayPower Responsive

Group General Counsel & Company Secretary

20 MayIn June 2015, we launched the Power Responsive programme, designed to help drive demand side response (DSR) growth through greater customer awareness and clear participation policies. We believe DSR will play an increasingly vital role in building a secure, affordable, sustainable electricity system by providing greater flexibility.

 

Power Responsive offers a means for suppliers, businesses and policy makers to collaborate, build awareness and deliver improved DSR solutions, helping to reduce total energy costs. The goal is to achieve 30–50% of balancing capability from the demand side by 2020.

You can find out more about the programme and case studies from customers signed up to DSR at www.powerresponsive.com

 

System Operator

As System Operator (SO) we are responsible for making sure Britain’s gas and electricity is transported safely and efficiently from where it is produced to where it is consumed, when it is needed. We make sure that supply and demand are balanced in real time and we facilitate the connection of assets to the transmission system.

Market context

Sources of energy are changing. In electricity, an increase in renewable generation such as wind, solar and tidal power, together with a decrease in more conventional generation such as coal and gas, is leading to greater variability and uncertainty. In gas, the changing location of gas being input into the transmission system will drive greater need for flexibility as the traditional north-south flow diminishes.

This makes our role in matching supply and demand more challenging, so we work with the market to make sure we have appropriate tools in place to balance the transmission system. We work with our customers and stakeholders to shape the future of the energy market, providing analysis and insight into the changing nature of energy. We also facilitate changes to the market frameworks to accommodate new technologies and ways of working, while considering how the role of the SO should evolve over time.

The SO is at the forefront of this debate helping to find solutions with industry.

What we have delivered in 2015/16

We continue to play a leading role in helping develop the UK’s future energy strategy, and that of Europe. Our approach includes working with customers and stakeholders on initiatives such as the translation of new EU code requirements for gas, the development of new demand side services in the form of the Power Responsive programme, the harmonisation of gas trading arrangements across Europe, our Future Energy Scenarios reports, and System Operability Framework workshops and webinars.

Building on customer and stakeholder feedback, we have reviewed our operations and restructured our organisation to deliver what our customers need. Our customer survey process has been improved, so we can better understand our performance and develop action plans to improve the services we deliver.

We continue to balance the UK’s energy needs in real time. We contracted additional balancing services of 2.4 GW for the 2015/16 winter period to be available to help manage periods of peak demand. This includes 133 MW from demand side balancing reserve arrangements.

In our role as Electricity Market Reform delivery body we facilitated the market capacity auction, which secured over 46 GW of capacity at a final clearing price of £18 per kW per year. It was also the first time that interconnectors participated.

Priorities for the year ahead

We will continue to find better ways to provide timely, cost effective and innovative solutions to balance supply and demand for gas and electricity.

Market developments

We will continue to work with Ofgem and DECC as they develop proposals to help meet the energy challenges of the future, including options for greater SO independence and ensuring there is no disruption to the vital role of the SO. We will work closely with our stakeholders as proposals for roles and responsibilities of the SO become clearer.

Customers and stakeholders

We will continue to develop our longer-term strategy to understand the issues that will affect our customers and stakeholders in the future, and plan how we will best support them.

Delivering energy

We will continue to support the evolution of market frameworks in the UK and Europe to enable new types of generation and demand to come forward in response as the energy landscape changes.

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Principal operations35


LOGO

36

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Strategic Report


   Strategic Report

Gas DistributionWe own and operate four of the eight regional gas distribution networks in Great Britain. Our networks comprise approximately 131,000 kilometres (81,400 miles) of gas distribution pipeline and we transport gas from the national transmission system to around 10.9 million consumers on behalf of 39 gas shippers.  

 

LOGO

In focus

263TWh

Gas consumption in our networks

We manage the National Gas Emergency number (0800 111 999) on behalf of all gas distribution networks.

We handled nearly 2.3 million calls during 2015/16, across the emergency number, enquiry lines, appliance repair helpline and meter enquiry service.

LOGO

Improving customer communications

To provide our customers with a safe and secure supply of gas we continue to invest in the network by replacing the existing metal gas mains pipes, which supply around 150,000 homes every year, with new hard-wearing plastic pipes.

A trial of a new suite of customer communication materials resulted in a 51% reduction in the number of complaints and enquiries in the trial areas. We will introduce these communication materials across all our networks in 2016/17 with the aim of improving our overall customer satisfaction performance, which is not yet at the level we would like.

Market context

We manage our networks to keep our customers safe and warm. We are incentivised through RIIO to operate efficiently and deliver services that our customers and stakeholders value.

Ofgem is able to make comparisons across all eight networks. It establishes outputs they are expected to deliver so we all maintain a safe and reliable network; make a positive contribution to sustainability and protect the environment; provide connections to supply new consumers and support new gas entry points into the network; meet their social obligations; and provide an agreed standard of service to consumers and other stakeholders.

We collaborate with the industry on issues, such as innovation, safety and the future of networks to deliver outcomes that customers value.

Gas remains an important part of the current and future energy mix and we are working with our customers and stakeholders to develop our networks to accommodate gas from new sources, such as biomethane.

What we’ve achieved in 2015/16

We remain committed to our ambition to be the best gas distribution business in Britain and continue to focus on delivering a safe and reliable service for our customers.

This year we were prosecuted for incidents at Scunthorpe and Dugdale and, after pleading guilty, accepted fines of £3m. We acknowledged that we did not do our job properly on these occasions and have since changed the way certain activities are carried out.

We have worked on improving the services we provide for our customers that make us a more efficient business. Responding to feedback from our employees and stakeholders, we have been improving the mobile technology used by our workforce and reducing the number and size of the holeswe dig in the roads. These initiatives improve customer satisfaction and will also help us to continue delivering our RIIO outputs.

We have continued to connect different sources of gas to our network, particularly biomethane. Since the first connection in October 2013, we have now completed 22 biomethane connections in our networks.

The most innovative during 2015/16 was Raynham Farms, Norfolk, which saw the first plastic pipe local transmission system connection in the UK.

We also connected the UK’s first HGV filling station to the high pressure local transmission system. This new facility in Leyland, Lancashire, supplies 100% renewable biomethane and will therefore play an important part in the UK’s rapidly growing renewable refuelling infrastructure. Our industry-leading work on the future of the gas network will ensure the gas distribution business features heavily in the nation’s energy infrastructure for many years to come.

We have been preparing our business for the introduction of domestic smart meters, which, following a UK Government coordinated rollout, we expect will be standard across the country by the end of 2020.

We have invested further in technology for our strategic partners. The Tier One Replacement System (TORS) enables us to replace the pipes beneath our feet without the need for excavations. TORS promises a revolution in working practices and less disruption for our customers. Following trials, we are looking to use this technology in 2016/17 and further improve safety, network efficiency and customer satisfaction.

Priorities for the year ahead

Maintain a stable and strong business throughout the process for the potential sale, to maximise shareholder value and continue to deliver a safe and reliable network.

Create a truly customer-focused business by removing inconsistencies in service delivery, reducing the number and size of excavations, and introducing the new customer communication materials.

Optimise our processes and work more collaboratively to continue to operate an efficient network for employees and customers.

Create further value in the business to improve financial stability and customer satisfaction, and increase operational efficiency.

We will also strive to have our safest year yet, and continue to work with the UK Government on the future role of gas and increase the use of new technologies.

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Principal operations37


LOGO

In focus

3.5m

electricity consumers in New England and upstate New York.

174km

(108 miles) of underground cable, 491 transmission substations and 668 distribution substations we operate in New England and upstate New York.

15 year

Our Power Supply Agreement (PSA) with LIPA is for 3,634 MW of capacity, comprising eight dual fuel (gas/oil-fired) steam units at three sites, 11 dual fuel combustion turbine units, and 27 oil-fired combustion turbine/diesel units.

27.5TWh

of electricity we forecast, plan for and procure annually across three states.

3.6m

consumers received services from our gas distribution networks including 24,341 new gas heating customers in 2015/16.

I believe there’s something special about living, working, and playing in the communities we serve. We have approximately 15,000 employees serving the energy needs of more than seven million customers in our service territories in Massachusetts, New York and Rhode Island.

Our shared sense of community has taught us that today’s customer is savvy, forward-thinking, and deeply mindful of the environment. We all want the same thing – to keep our communities healthy and prosperous. Together we can do it by working to solve what I believe is the greatest challenge of our time – climate change – while delivering innovation and economic development.

This makes our next steps as an energy provider straightforward: we need to make sure our energy becomes cleaner, more efficient, resilient and reliable, and with more customer choices.

We’ve promised to meet the energy needs of our customers in New England and New York. Let me tell you how we’ve done that over the past year, and what we have planned for the future.

A balanced approach

Our energy is becoming cleaner. All three of the states we serve have established goals of 80% reductions in emissions economy-wide versus 1990 levels by 2050. These states have already made progress toward their targets, but almost all emission reductions have come from cleaning up power generation.

We are also committed to working towards a decarbonised energy network by 2050. It’s why we advocate for a balanced solution that includes renewables, energy efficiency, and increasing gas transmission.

We are taking the lead on innovating ways to make solar connections easier and more affordable. We support the Deepwater Wind project off the coast of Block Island, the first offshore wind project in the US. We are also proponents of the Maine Green Line, which would use a submarine cable to transmit wind power from northern Maine to Massachusetts, supplemented by imports of hydropower from Canada.

In both New England and New York, we are planning for new or expanded gas pipelines. You can read about what we’re doing in each of our service territories in our regulated business section, pages 39 to 41.

In 2015, we received a number of accolades: ACEEE scored all three states in which we operate in the top 10 in energy efficiency; we are number five in the nation for solar megawatts installed per customer (according to the Solar Electric Power Association); and we were named the number one green utility in the US according to Newsweek’s ‘Top Green Companies in the World 2015’.

Looking forward

Connect21 remains our strategy to build and operate a better energy distribution network for the 21st century digital economy. Also gas forms a bridge that will help take us to a decarbonised future. It supports our intent to bring on more intermittent renewable energy generation until reliable large-scale energy storage technologies become available.

While aggressive, our strategy establishes a platform for a decarbonised energy supply chain without economic disruption in local communities.

38National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Strategic Report


   Strategic Report

US Regulated business

LOGO

LOGO

“We filed three rate
cases in 2015 – one in
Massachusetts and two
in downstate New York”

What we do and where we do it

Electricity

We jointly own and operate transmission facilities across upstate New York, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island and Vermont. We own and operate electricity distribution networks in upstate New York, Massachusetts and Rhode Island.

Gas

We own and operate gas distribution networks across the northeastern US, located in upstate New York, New York City, Long Island, Massachusetts and Rhode Island.

What we’ve achieved during 2015/16

Safety

Our safety performance continues to improve. Through to March 2016 we’ve seen a 9% reduction in the number of injuries requiring medical attention and a 26% reduction in the number of injuries requiring employees to be out of work. We believe these improvements are the result of our safety plans, aimed at reducing key risks and preventing incidents, along with enhanced and targeted communications on lessons learned and intended to prevent reoccurrence.

During 2016/17, we will continue to build on safety plans with a significant focus on the prevention of soft tissue injuries, slips/trips/ falls, and road traffic collisions.

Rate cases

We filed three rate cases in 2015 – one in Massachusetts and two in downstate New York.

In Massachusetts, we proposed to set new electricity distribution rates that will allow us to continue investing in our electricity infrastructure and improving service to our 1.3 million electricity customers. This submission covers only the distribution rates, found in the delivery portion of National Grid’s electricity bills. This is the cost of delivering electricity to our customers and includes costs such as poles, wires, utility trucks, customer computer systems and taxes – all the costs to operate our business.

In New York, we proposed to update and reset our gas delivery rates that will allow us to continue investing in our natural gas networks and improving service to our 1.8 million gas customers in Brooklyn, Queens and Staten Island and Long Island/Rockaway Peninsula.

These proposals will let us:

modernise and enhance the safety, reliability and resilience of our gas infrastructure;
upgrade our gas network to deliver economic and environmental benefits;
extend our gas expansion programme and add more gas heating customers each year;
improve customer service capabilities; and
deliver economic development funding and promote STEM education programmes.

These three proposals are undergoing a thorough review process by our regulators in each state. If approved, new charges will take effect from 1 October 2016 in Massachusetts and 1 January 2017 in New York.

Additionally, the New York Public Service Commission (PSC) will soon decide on two important items related to Niagara Mohawk. In December 2015, we filed a capex petition for Niagara Mohawk, which builds upon similar successful interim capex filings done for KEDNY and KEDLI in the past, and seeks to provide funding for $1.4bn of capex across FY17 and FY18. This ‘extension filing’ should allow us to use deferral account money, so that customer rates do not increase until we make our next full rate filing. Secondly, we are also waiting for approval for our Niagara Mohawk’s financing plans, which will enable us to fund future construction and meet the mandatory redemptions. The petitions also afforded us with an opportunity to replace higher cost debt when economic to do so.

New Energy Solutions

In July, we announced the creation of our New Energy Solutions (NES) team. This team is focusing on driving cleaner energy, improving efficiency, affordability, and choice for customers. The goal of NES is to deliver state-mandated initiatives such as New York State’s Reforming the Energy Vision (REV) and Grid Modernization (GridMod) in Massachusetts. It is also driving other innovative energy initiatives, like large-scale solar, electric vehicles, and battery storage.

Our jurisdictions

Each of our jurisdictions has projects under way to develop economic and environmental health in three ways: by driving economic growth; providing cleaner energy; and advancing innovative technologies. The following highlights some of our 2015/16 achievments.

Massachusetts

Year one of a two-year smart energy solutions smart grid pilot achieved a 98% retention rate from the original 15,000 customers who started in the pilot, a 72% customer satisfaction rate, and for active participants, an average energy saving of $100 or more.

Earlier this year, we submitted a proposal for a two-pipeline solution to address natural gas constraints in New England that included contracts with Access Northeast and the Northeast Energy Direct gas pipeline project. MADPU began a review of those proposals.

In April, Kinder Morgan decided not to move forward with Northeast Energy Direct. We have begun work to identify alternative solutions that can help meet the needs of our current and future gas customers.

The project was part of a two-pipeline solution intended to provide additional gas delivery capacity into the region for electricity generators. So, to stabilise electricity supply prices for our customers, Spectra’s proposed Access Northeast project now becomes increasingly critical for the region.

Customers have been subjected to billions of dollars in electricity price increases over the last three winters. Supply prices are market-driven and are largely due to the increased demand for natural gas. An increase in supply capacity will help meet demand and lower prices for our customers.

We installed 28 miles of new gas mains, replaced 150 miles of gas mains, and added more than 6,900 new natural gas customers.

New York

In December 2015, we energised the Five Mile Road substation in rural Cattaraugus County, south of Buffalo. The $51.7 million project was several years in the making, and brings increased reliability and capability to the Company’s bulk power transmission network across the southwest portion of New York state. It also involved upgrades to existing transmission circuits in the region.

We opened a new gas control centre on Long Island. This monitors and controls the gas system in our downstate and upstate regions. It also houses the Academy, a centre for technical and management training. High school students are welcome here through

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Principal operations39


Principal operationscontinued

US Regulated business

our Engineering Pipeline Program, to explore engineering safety, natural gas operations, electric power systems and smart grid technologies.

We awarded our two largest energy efficiency grants since our energy efficiency incentive programme began in 2009. With a $1.8 million incentive, Finch Paper in Glens Falls, New York purchased new equipment to remove bark and chip wood, reduce its energy use, yield more fibre, and secure a long-term supply of eight-foot logs, the company’s primary raw material. Quad Graphics in Saratoga Springs, New York used a $1.1 million grant to install a more efficient printing press that has increased production by more than 60%.

We continue to invest more in replacing gas mains. The NYPSC approved $414 million gas infrastructure investment in Long Island to speed up the replacement of ageing pipe and extend the use of natural gas to more customers. We added more than 15,600 new gas customers.

Rhode Island

As part of our sea2shore project, we’ve begun installing an underwater 34.5 kV cable in preparation for Deepwater Wind, the nation’s first offshore wind farm. The approximate 20-mile underwater cable will link Deepwater’s five turbine project off Block Island to the mainland power grid.

The 30 MW wind farm has the capacity to generate enough power for 17,000 homes and will also include a fibreoptic line, bringing high-speed internet service to Block Island for the first time. The wind farm is expected to start operating this autumn.

We added seven miles of new gas mains, replaced 50 miles of gas mains, and added more than 1,800 new natural gas customers.

FERC

Partnering with Eversource, we completed the interstate reliability project, completing the New England East West Solution – a suite of projects designed to strengthen the reliability of the regional power grid.

Our costs for the project, $267.6 million, include station upgrades and the installation of a 75-mile, 345 kV transmission line along rights-of-way in Connecticut, Massachusetts and Rhode Island.

LOGO

Along with three other leading energy companies, we announced in January 2016, a proposal – The Wind and Hydro Response – to deliver 400 MW of reliable, cost-effective clean energy to New England. The Wind and Hydro Response is our answer to a request for clean energy solutions that was issued jointly by state agencies and electricity distribution companies (including National Grid) in Massachusetts, Rhode Island and Connecticut.

Priorities for the year ahead

Our Connect21 journey continues to evolve with these three priorities for 2016/17: Performance excellence, customer value, and future customer expectations.

Performance excellence: Continue our safety compliance and performance excellence journey. Drive new ways of working, including performance excellence, compliance improvement programmes, and safety plans.

Customer value: Maximise and communicate customer value. Deliver tangible value to customers as identified and measured by our service-level agreements.

Future customer expectations: Anticipate future customer needs and transform our customer experience. Leverage jurisdictional model, digital customer experience, Connect21 platform, New Energy Solutions, and REV/Grid Mod filings.

Solar initiative in Massachusetts

Our Solar Phase II initiative installs large solar systems on sites we believe will bring the most benefit to the electric distribution system, regardless of the construction challenges it may pose.

Approved by MADPU in 2014, the initiative allows us to install up to 20 MW of utility-owned solar capacity.

During 2015/16 we partnered with local solar developers and municipalities to secure 18 sites in 12 municipalities across Massachusetts for projects ranging from 650 kW to 1 MW. So far, we have constructed and connected four sites, providing 3.3 MW of solar capacity to the grid.

In focus

Connect21

Connect21 is our strategy to advance America’s natural gas and electricity infrastructure beyond its 20th century limitations, and create a more customer-centric, resilient, agile, efficient and environmentally sound energy network.

16.5bn

standard cubic metres of gas that we forecast, plan for and procure annually.

40National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Strategic Report


   Strategic Report

LOGO

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Principal operations41


LOGO

42National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Strategic Report


   Strategic Report

Principal operationscontinued

Other activities

 LOGO

“We sold two sites this year,

creating the potential for

more than 1,750 new

homes in  London”

In focus

31%

Approximate percentage of UK gas from LNG imports, up from 27% in 2014.

LOGO

LNG ship reloading

During 2015/16, we completed our first LNG ship reload where more than 157,000m3 of LNG, at around -158°C, was transferred onto another ship for onward transport. The reload process, coupled with the storage capability available at Grain, provides greater flexibility for customers.

LOGO

Creating potential for new homes

In April 2015 we sold our site at Leeside Road, Tottenham to the London Borough of Enfield. The 17 acre site has potential for 840 homes. We dismantled two gas holders before the sale, using clay from the London Power Tunnels project to fill in the holder bases.

In the same month we sold our 90 acre site at Ebbsfleet Green to Redrow homes. The site has potential for 950 homes and forms part of the wider garden city proposal championed by Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne.

Interconnectors

The England-France interconnector (IFA) is a 2,000 MW HVDC link between the French and British transmission systems with ownership shared between National Grid and Réseau de Transport d’Electricité. Average availability for 2015/16 was 92.94%, up from 90.46% in 2014/15. A substantial proportion of the flow continues to be in the import direction, from France to Great Britain.

In July 2015, we launched a new process that gives customers vital information before an outage, meaning they are more able to accurately react and adjust their market position – improving the service they receive from IFA.

BritNed is a joint venture between National Grid and TenneT, the Dutch transmission system operator. It owns and operates a 1,000 MW HVDC link between England and the Netherlands. As with IFA, a substantial proportion of the flow is in the import direction from the Netherlands to Great Britain.

Following Board approval for the Belgium (Nemo Link) and Norway (North Sea Link) interconnectors in 2015, construction is now under way for both projects.

Nemo Link, developed between National Grid Interconnector Holdings Ltd and Elia, the Belgium transmission system operator, will connect Richborough in the UK and Herdersbrug in Belgium. The subsea cable will be 130 kilometres in length and have the capacity of 1 GW. Nemo Link is due to be operational in 2019.

North Sea Link (NSL) will connect Blyth in the UK and Kvilldal in Norway. Developed between National Grid and Statnett, the Norwegian transmission system operator, at 720 kilometres, NSL will be the world’s longest subsea cable and will have a capacity of 1.4 GW. NSL is expected to be operational in 2021.

Grain LNG

Grain LNG is one of three LNG importation facilities in the UK. It operates under long-term contracts with customers and provides importation services of ship berthing, temporary storage and re-gasification into the national transmission system.

Our road tanker loading facility was commissioned in November 2015. The new loading hub offers a more environmentally-friendly alternative fuel and allows road tanker operators to load and transport LNG in bulk.

Metering

National Grid Metering (NGM) provides installation and maintenance services to energy suppliers in the regulated market in Great Britain. It maintains an asset base of around 13.4 million domestic, industrial and commercial meters.

Customer satisfaction scores for NGM remain positive for both its domestic, industrial and commercial businesses. We continue to work with our customers on areas for improvement by exploring additional products and services so we can respond to the rapidly changing non-domestic sector.

We continue to evaluate the opportunity of participating directly in the smart metering market by providing an end-to-end, dual-fuel smart metering offering to energy suppliers.

UK Property

National Grid Property is responsible for the management, clean-up and disposal of surplus sites in the UK, most of which are former gas works.

During 2015/16, we sold two sites and exchanged contracts on several high-profile land disposals with our joint venture partners under St William Homes LLP. Our estate management, gas holder dismantling and contaminated land clean-up programmes continue to reduce operational risk across our portfolio. In April 2016 BNP Paribas Real Estate took on our new real estate management services.

Xoserve

Xoserve delivers transactional services on behalf of all the major gas network transportation companies in Great Britain, including National Grid. Xoserve is jointly owned by National Grid, as majority shareholder, and the other gas distribution network companies. Xoserve celebrated its 10 year anniversary as a company on 1 May 2015.

US non-regulated businesses

Some of our US businesses are not subject to state or federal rate-making authority. These include interests in some of our LNG road transportation, some gas transmission pipelines (our minority equity interests in these are not regulated) and certain commercial services relating to solar installations, fuel cells and other new technologies that are an important part of our future.

Corporate activities

Corporate activities comprise central overheads, Group insurance and expenditure incurred on business development.

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Principal operations43


Our people

If we are to achieve our strategic objectives, we need to make sure

our employees have the right skills and capabilities.

Safeguarding the future

We remain committed to helping address the significant skills challenge facing the engineering profession in both the UK and US.

In the UK, engineering companies are projected to need 182,000 people with engineering skills each year until 2022, according to the 2016 Engineering UK Report – yet the estimated shortfall is 69,000 annually.

A particular concern has been the low number of young women interested in engineering. Our initiatives include our residential work experience week, which in 2015 extended to around 100 young people, balanced 50/50 between girls and boys. 99% of the students said that the experience increased their interest in engineering, while 69% of the female students said that it persuaded them to follow a career in the energy industry.

We are helping schools, parents and children see engineering as a modern, dynamic, desirable career with a great future. Our employees act as education ambassadors who volunteer their time for a range of activities in the classroom and at science and engineering fairs, most notably on STEM enrichment, careers education and our work experience programmes.

In the US, we completed the sixth year of our National Grid Engineering Pipeline Program, designed to inspire high school students to pursue an engineering education and career. To date, 258 promising students have participated in the programme.

We promoted STEM education and careers to more than 300 middle and high school students during our Engineering our Future initiative. We also partner with seven local community colleges to deliver programmes designed to produce future electric line workers.

We have begun a partnership with the State University of New York to develop a Natural Gas Technician Certificate Program, designed to address future hiring needs for our gas operations.

We are continuing our partnership with the Center for Energy Workforce Development on its ‘energy industry fundamentals’.

Our US work experience opportunities include summer internships. Some interns start their journey into the energy industry through our Engineering Our Future programme and go on to join our Company through our graduate development programme.

We also offer summer internships in the UK, as well as 12 month industrial placements to undergraduates in their penultimate year. These programmes offer students the opportunity to experience our Company before deciding to join the organisation as graduates.

Building skills and expertise

Providing high-quality development opportunities for our employees is essential for us to construct, maintain and operate our electricity and gas networks safely and reliably. This year, our Academy has delivered 154,025 days of technical, safety, leadership and personal effectiveness training across our global workforce.

In January 2016, we inducted 75 high-potential employees onto our accelerated development programme; designed to enhance our leadership succession planning.

We have also developed our performance leadership programme, designed to help strengthen our performance leadership capability for leaders who manage functions or organisations.

Promoting an inclusive and diverse workforce

Our inclusion and diversity activities include attraction and recruitment, development, leadership, role modelling and cultural change.

A number of UK leaders were paired with mentors representing a range of diverse characteristics, allowing them to increase their knowledge of a particular area of diversity. Feedback was very positive and a further wave of the programme is planned.

In the US, we have continued to promote inclusiveness through programmes designed to raise awareness of unconscious bias and disability employment. Senior leaders have also shared personal experiences about inclusion through a series of videos.

We support 10 employee resource groups in the US, and six in the UK, that encompass inclusion and diversity. These groups are chaired by senior business leaders, so they can shape change within the business and the communities we serve, while providing professional development to the members.

In addition to our well-established Springboard and Spring Forward programmes for women, we are introducing a programme targeted at other under-represented groups – mainly ethnic minorities. We are also piloting a new online professional development platform for women and an initiative in the US is introducing more women into our field force.

Externally, we continue to be recognised as an employer of choice and work in partnership with a number of organisations that promote inclusion and diversity.

National Grid employees were named as the EY Young Energy Professional of the year 2015; a finalist in the Black British business awards; and one of six women profiled in the EY Women in Power and Energy Index 2015.

At the end of 2015, we were one of the first FTSE organisations to publish UK gender pay data.

In the UK, we have signed up to the Living Wage Foundation. We have committed to making sure our employees and those of our new suppliers are paid at least the Living Wage and have also pledged to take this further than the accreditation requires, including a commitment that our apprentices, interns and graduates at National Grid are also paid at least the Living Wage.

44National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Strategic Report


   Strategic Report

LOGO

In focus

1.8m

Number of engineers, technicians and crafts people needed in the UK over the period 2012–2022.

7

Number of US local community colleges with whom we partner to deliver utility technology training programmes.

KPIs

pages 18–21

Board diversity

page 62

LOGO

EmployAbility

In the UK, the EmployAbility programme targeted at young people with special needs is a notable example of the work done by our employee resource groups. The programme has now expanded to offer work experience internships at a number of our sites, and has garnered public recognition for its innovation and impact. Our US business has now launched its own pilot of the EmployAbility programme.

LOGO

Troops to energy jobs

We work with veterans through the US troops to energy jobs programme, designed to help veterans make the transition from military service to the energy industry. Through our role with the US Joining Forces initiative, launched by the White House, we are aiming for 10% of our new hires to come from veterans over the next 10 years.

   LOGO

“Our UK employees raised

over £600,000 in support

of Macmillan, our chosen

charity partner”

The table below shows the breakdown by gender at different levels of the organisation. We have included information relating to subsidiary directors, as this is required by the Companies Act 2006 (Strategic Report and Directors’ Reports) Regulations 2013. We define ‘senior management’ as those managers who are at the same level, or one level below, our Executive Committee. It also includes those who are directors of subsidiaries, or who have responsibility for planning, directing or controlling the activities of the Company, or a strategically significant part of the Company, and are employees of the Company.

   

 

Financial year ended 31 March 2016

 
  Male  Female  Total  Male
%
  

Female

%

 

Our Board

  8    3    11    72.7    27.3  

Senior

management

  189    63    252    75    25  

Whole

Company*

  19,177    5,891    25,068    76.5    23.5  

*This measure is also one of our Company KPIs. See page 20 for more information.

Health and wellbeing

During 2015/16 we have continued to raise awareness of mental wellbeing across our UK business.

We have a leading role in the Business in the Community Workwell campaign that is focusing on mental wellbeing in the workplace, and also an alumni network supporting the Time to Change campaign.

More than 670 of our employees have pledged to support this campaign, and others have shared their personal stories, encouraging colleagues to talk about mental health. During 2015/16, we have trained more than 250 employees on mental health first aid.

Initiatives designed to improve employees’ understanding of good nutrition have included a nutritional challenge. Our wellbeing kiosks were used more than 16,000 times by our employees during 2015/16, recording data such as blood pressure and weight.

In the US, our focus on soft tissue injury prevention included a sports therapy initiative. Our educational programmes focused on diseases such as diabetes and cancer.

Our employee engagement survey results continue to show that employees have a good awareness of our wellbeing programmes.

Volunteering

Our employees continue to share their skills, time and expertise through skills-based volunteering and fundraising activities.

In the UK, employees provided more than 14,000 hours of support to community projects. They participated in a number of fundraising activities to help our employee chosen charity partnership with Macmillan Cancer Support reach its fundraising target. Their efforts helped us exceed our target, raising more than £600,000, which provided 3,121 emergency fuel grants to people affected by cancer. We also raised more than £17,000 for Special Olympics Great Britain by organising a summer games event and supported the organisation’s Athletes Leadership Programme.

In the US, our Power to Serve employee volunteering programme supports our stewardship and safety principles. It seeks to acknowledge existing community service, as well as to create new volunteer opportunities for employees.

Human rights

National Grid does not have a specific policy relating to human rights, but respect for human rights is incorporated into our employment practices and our values, which include respecting others and valuing diversity. See page 194 for more information.

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Our people45


Letter from the Chairman and

Corporate Governance contents

Sir Peter Gershon            

Chairman

LOGO

Corporate Governance contents
Letter from the Chairman46

Our Board47

Corporate Governance49
– Board composition49

– Our Board and its committees49

– Board focus50

– Directors’ induction programme51

– Director development and training51

– Investor engagement51

– Board and committee membership
and attendance

52

Board and committee evaluation52

Audit Committee54

Finance Committee59

Safety, Environment and Health Committee60

Nominations Committee61

– Board diversity and the Davies Review62

Management committees63

Statement of compliance with the UK Corporate Governance Code64

Index to Directors’ Report and other disclosures67

Directors’ Remuneration Report68

Dear Shareholders,
This has been an interesting and exciting year for the Company and the Board, with the Board agenda focusing on some significant topics. External influences on the Board agenda included cyber security, the future of the System Operator, political developments and how the referendum on continued UK membership of the EU will affect the Company. The Board has also been spending time on the Company’s strategy for the short and long term, the Group’s principal risks and risk appetite, US rate case filings and the proposed sale of our UK Gas Distribution business, all of which are referenced in more detail later in this report.
Changes to the UK Corporate Governance Code 2014 (the Code)
Following the changes introduced in the Code and the Financial Reporting Council’s (FRC) guidance on risk management, the risk team and Audit Committee reviewed our risk processes to make sure we have effective systems and processes in place to meet the new requirements. You can read more about our processes on pages 26 and 27.
The Board also reviewed and approved the Company’s principal risks. This has been a very valuable process for the Board and played an important part in its approval of the viability statement required by the Code. You can

read our new viability statement on page 30. After many recent changes to the Code, including the final draft of the UK Corporate Governance Code 2016, I welcome the FRC’s commitment to avoid further updates to the Code until at least 2019, which will allow the UK governance landscape to settle and establish itself.

External Board evaluation

This year we appointed Independent Audit to undertake a formal and rigorous externally facilitated Board and committee evaluation. With the recent changes to the Code we thought it would be appropriate for the evaluation to focus on risk. Independent Audit concluded that the Board was working well and that it benefits from a good mix of experience from both the UK and US. They noted there was a good balance between strategic, operational and regulatory matters, with good engagement supported by thorough work by management. They made a number of recommendations in relation to risk, principally focused on cascading risk management further down the business. The results of the evaluation were presented to the Board in April, and a number of recommendations to take forward were considered by the Board in May. We will be monitoring the outcome during the year and will report on progress in next year’s Annual Report and Accounts. You can find more information about the evaluation on pages 52 and 53.

Cyber security

During the year, the Board considered the threats we face and the effectiveness of our cyber security strategy to mitigate the inherent risks. In June 2015, the Board received an in-depth presentation so it could gain a comprehensive overview of the Company’s long-term strategy on this issue. The focus was on establishing guiding principles for cyber security, deciding what questions the Board should be asking of the cyber security team and the development of a new cyber programme. This will improve the existing programme and help enhance the level of security to protect the business and to keep pace with the increasing scale and sophistication of threats. The Board will be receiving cyber security training and additional updates later in the year.

Board changes

As previously announced, Steve Holliday retired as Chief Executive on 31 March 2016, and will step down from the Board on 22 July 2016. He was succeeded as Chief Executive by John Pettigrew. Steve will leave National Grid after nearly a decade as Chief Executive and 15 years on the Board. Following John’s appointment, we will also welcome Nicola Shaw on to the Board as Executive Director, UK from 1 July 2016.

In my role as Chairman, I am responsible for making sure the Board operates effectively, by promoting effective relationships and open communication between Directors. This is particularly important as the membership of the Board changes and new relationships are formed. Maintaining and promoting a culture of openness and debate and making sure the Board work together as a team are also important aspects considered during an appointment process.

The Nominations Committee oversaw the rigorous selection process in the search for Steve’s successor and for our new Executive Director, UK. You can read more about this on page 61. These appointments were key to the Board and the fit with the current membership and how the individuals combine to add value was an important consideration in the decision-making process.

LOGO

Sir Peter Gershon

Chairman

46National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Corporate Governance


   Corporate Governance

Our Board

Key

A Audit Committee

F Finance Committee

N Nominations Committee

R Remuneration Committee

S Safety, Environment and Health Committee

(ch) Chairman of committee

^ Including National Grid Group plc

Tenure as at 31 March 2016

Charts and committee membership are as at 18 May 2016

LOGO

Sir Peter Gershon CBE FREng (69)

ChairmanN (ch)

Appointed: 1 August 2011 as Deputy Chairman and became Chairman with effect from 1 January 2012

Tenure: 4 years

Career:Sir Peter is a Fellow of the Royal Academy of Engineering and has held a number of senior positions across multiple industries. His previous appointments include Chief Executive of the Office of Government Commerce, Managing Director of Marconi Electronic Systems and a member of the UK Defence Academy Advisory Board. Sir Peter is currently Chairman of Tate & Lyle plc and a Non-executive Chairman of the Aircraft Carrier Alliance Management Board and most recently a Trustee of The Sutton Trust Board.

Skills and experience: Sir Peter has significant board level experience gained across multiple industries, with considerable experience in Government through previous roles. He also has significant experience of general management both in the city and internationally and brings to the Board an in-depth understanding of the high-tech industry.

LOGO

John Pettigrew FEI, FIET (47)

Chief ExecutiveF

Appointed: 1 April 2014 and became Chief Executive with effect from 1 April 2016

Tenure: 2 years

Career: A Fellow of the Energy Institute and of the Institution of Energy and Technology, John joined the Company in 1991 and has over 25 years of experience at National Grid in a variety of senior management roles. John’s previous appointments include Director of Engineering from 2003, Chief Operating Officer and Executive Vice President for the US Electricity Distribution & Generation business between 2007 and 2010, Chief Operating Officer for UK Gas Distribution between 2010 and 2012, and UK Chief Operating Officer from 2012 to 2014. John was appointed to the role of Chief Executive on 1 April 2016.

Skills and experience: Through his wide variety of roles in the UK and US businesses John has extensive knowledge of the Company as well as the engineering and utilities industries as a whole. He has anin-depth understanding of the Government and regulatory landscape.

LOGO

Steve Holliday FREng (59)

Executive Director

Appointed:National Grid Group plc on 30 March 2001, to the Board in October 2002 and as Chief Executive from January 2007 through to 31 March 2016

Tenure:15 years^

Career: A Fellow of the Royal Academy of Engineering, Steve was an Executive Director at British Borneo Oil and Gas before joining National Grid in 2001. Most recently Steve was Chairman of the UK Business Council for Sustainable Energy, a Prince’s National Ambassador and Non-executive Director of Marks and Spencer Group plc. Steve is currently Chairman of Crisis UK and of the Energy, and Efficiency Industrial Partnership, Vice Chairman for Business in the Community and of The Careers and Enterprise Company and Lead Non-executive Director and Board member for the Department for Energy, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA).

Skills and experience: Steve has significant knowledge and experience of the energy and utilities industries in the UK and internationally. He has considerable board level, Government and regulatory experience.

LOGO

Andrew Bonfield (53)

Finance DirectorF, S

Appointed: 1 November 2010

Tenure: 5 years

Career:Andrew is a chartered accountant with significant financial experience having previously been Chief Financial Officer at Cadbury plc until March 2010; he also spent five years as Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer of Bristol-Myers Squibb Company. As well as this, Andrew also has previous experience in the energy sector as Finance Director of BG Group plc and is currently a Non-executive Director of Kingfisher plc.

Skills and experience:Andrew brings significant finance experience to the Board and has extensive knowledge of international industries. Through his appointments in senior positions across several industries, Andrew has an in-depth knowledge of the energy and utilities industries both in the UK and internationally, in particular the US energy market.

LOGO

Dean Seavers (55)

Executive Director, US

Appointed:1 April 2015

Tenure:1 year

Career: Dean began his career at the Ford Motor Company and held various senior management positions at Tyco International Ltd. before joining General Electric Company/United Technologies Corporation. He was President and Chief Executive Officer of General Electric Security and then President, Global Services of United Technologies Fire & Security. Dean was also a member of the Board of Directors of the National Fire Protection Association from 2010 to 2014 and lead network member at City Light Capital from 2011 to 2015 and President and Chief Executive at Red Hawk Fire & Security, LLC from 2012 to 2014. Dean is currently a Board member of Red Hawk Fire & Security, LLC.

Skills and experience:Dean has a wide range of financial and customer experience. He has significant general management experience with a particular focus on change and performance improvement programmes. Dean also has extensive knowledge of international markets, the city, corporate finance and financial services.

LOGO

Alison Kay (52)

Group General Counsel

& Company Secretary

Appointed:24 January 2013

Career: Alison has undertaken several roles since joining National Grid in 1996 including UK General Counsel and Company Secretary from 2000 to 2008 and Commercial Director, UK Transmission from 2008 to 2012. Before joining National Grid she was a corporate/commercial solicitor in private practice.

Skills and experience:Alison is an experienced commercial lawyer bringing a wealth of practical advice and guidance to her current role. She has developed expertise in regulatory and contractual law and legal risk management through her experience at National Grid. She also brings rigour around corporate governance and reporting to the Board, gained partly through her current role and also in her previous role as Secretary to the boards of the subsidiary companies, National Grid Gas plc and National Grid Electricity Transmission plc.

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Our Board47


Corporate Governancecontinued

Key

A Audit Committee

F Finance Committee

N Nominations Committee

R Remuneration Committee

S Safety, Environment and Health Committee

(ch) Chairman of committee

^ Including National Grid Group plc

Tenure as at

31 March 2016

Charts and Committee membership are as at 18 May 2016

Board gender

LOGO

Executive and

Non-executive

Directors

LOGO

Non-executive

Director tenure

LOGO

LOGO

Nora Mead Brownell (69)

Non-executive DirectorN, R, S

Independent

Appointed: 1 June 2012

Tenure: 3 years

Career:A key individual in the US energy industry, Nora has significant experience gained in a variety of roles including Commissioner of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and former President of the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners. Most recently, Nora sat on the Boards of ONCOR Electric Delivery Holding Company LLC and Comverge, Inc. Nora is currently a member of the Board of Spectra Energy Partners LP, Direct Energy Advisory Board and the Advisory Board of Morgan Stanley Infrastructure Partners as well as a partner in ESPY Energy Solutions, LLC.

Skills and experience: Through herNon-executive directorships, Nora brings extensive experience in US Government and regulation and has significant expertise in the US utilities industry in particular through her role as a Commissioner with FERC.

LOGO

Jonathan Dawson (64)

Non-executive DirectorF, N, R, (ch)

Independent

Appointed: 4 March 2013

Tenure:3 years

Career: Jonathan started his career in the Ministry of Defence before moving to Lazard where he spent more than 20 years. He was a Non-executive Director of Galliford Try plc, National Australia Group Europe Limited and Standard Life Investments (Holdings) Limited. Most recently he was Chairman of the Remuneration Committee, Non-executive and Senior Independent Director of Next plc until May 2015. Jonathan is currently aNon-executive Director of Jardine Lloyd Thompson Group plc and Chairman and a founding partner of Penfida Limited.

Skills and experience:Jonathan has a wide range of city experience with a significant and in-depth understanding of the corporate finance, pensions and banking industries.

LOGO

Therese Esperdy (55)

Non-executive DirectorA, F, (ch), N

Independent

Appointed: 18 March 2014, and appointed to the Board of National Grid USA from 1 May 2015

Tenure: 2 years

Career: Having started her banking career at Lehman Brothers, Therese joined Chase Securities in 1997 and then held a variety of senior roles at JP Morgan Chase & Co. These included appointments as Head of US Debt Capital Markets and Global Head of Debt Capital Markets, co-head of Banking, Asia Pacific and Global Chairman of the Financial Institutions Group.

Skills and experience: Therese has significant experience in city, corporate finance and banking through her previous appointments. She also has a wide range of international experience having worked in a number of international markets.

LOGO

Paul Golby CBE FREng (65)

Non-executive DirectorA, N, R, S, (ch)

Independent

Appointed: 1 February 2012

Tenure: 4 years

Career:A fellow of the Royal Academy of Engineering, Paul has held a variety of roles within the energy and utilities industries. Paul was an Executive Director of Clayhithe plc, before later joining E.ON UK plc where he was Chief Executive and later Chairman. He was also a Non-executive Chairman of AEA Technology Group plc. Paul is currently the Chairman of EngineeringUK, the UK National Air Traffic System, the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council and a member of the Council for Science and Technology. Most recently, Paul was appointed as Chairman of Costain Group plc on 5 May 2016.

Skills and experience:Paul has experience in energy utilities, Government and regulatory industries. Paul also has a wide range of board level experience gained through his Chief Executive and Chairman appointments.

LOGO

Ruth Kelly (48)

Non-executive DirectorA, F, N

Independent

Appointed: 1 October 2011

Tenure:4 years

Career: Ruth began her career in Government where she held various senior roles, including Secretary of State for Transport, for Communities and Local Government, for Education and Skills as well as Financial Secretary to the Treasury. She was also a senior executive at HSBC until August 2015. Ruth is currently appointed as Governor for the National Institute of Economic and Social Research and Pro Vice Chancellor at St Mary’s University; she has also been a Non-executive Director on the Financial Conduct Authority Board since April 2016.

Skills and experience: Ruth brings in-depth knowledge of Government and regulatory practice; she also has experience in banking and corporate finance.

LOGO

Mark Williamson (58)

Non-executive Director and Senior Independent DirectorA, (ch), N, R

Independent

Appointed: 3 September 2012

Tenure: 3 years

Career: A qualified accountant with significant financial experience, Mark was Chief Accountant and then Group Financial Controller of Simon Group plc before joining International Power plc as Group Financial Controller and later as Chief Financial Officer. Mark was a Non-executive Director at Alent plc where he was Chairman of the Audit Committee and Senior Independent Director. Mark is currently the Chairman of Imperial Brands PLC.

Skills and experience: Mark has extensive city, international accounting and finance experience in addition to senior and board level experience across multiple industries. Mark’s experience in energy utilities amongst other industries has provided a good understanding of Government and regulatory matters.

48National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Corporate Governance


   Corporate Governance

Key

Lines of reporting

Board/Board

committees

Executive Committee

to Board/Board

committees

Management

committees to

Executive Committee/

Board committees

Lines of

communication

Corporate Governance

Board composition

The successful delivery of our strategy depends upon attracting and retaining the right talent. This starts with having a high-quality Board. Balance is an important requirement for the composition of the Board, not only in terms of the number of Executive and Non-executive Directors, but also in terms of expertise, diversity and backgrounds.

While traditional diversity criteria such as gender and ethnicity are important, we also value diversity of skills, experience, knowledge and thinking styles. You can read about our Board diversity policy in the Nominations Committee report on page 61.

This year we said goodbye to Steve Holliday as Chief Executive and welcomed John Pettigrew as his successor. We will also be welcoming Nicola Shaw onto the Board as Executive Director, UK, from 1 July 2016. Apart from the appointment of Dean Seavers on 1 April 2015, as noted in last year’s Annual Report and Accounts, there have been no other changes to the Board composition that have come into effect during the financial year. We continue to look forward, with succession planning being an important focus for the Nominations Committee and the Board.

Our Board and its committees

The Board delegates authority to its Board committees to carry out certain tasks on its behalf, so that it can operate efficiently and give the right level of attention and consideration to relevant matters.

The committee structure, reporting and communication lines are set out in the diagram below and the role and responsibilities of the committees are set out in their respective terms of reference, available on our website. Committee agendas and schedules of items to be discussed at future meetings are prepared in accordance with the terms of reference of each committee and take account of other topical and ad-hoc matters.

In addition to the vertical lines of reporting, the committees communicate and work together where required. For example, during the appointment process for John Pettigrew the Remuneration Committee worked closely with the Nominations Committee.

At Board committee meetings, items are discussed and, as appropriate, endorsed, approved or recommended to the Board, by the committee. Following Board committee meetings, the chairman of each committee provides the Board with a summary of the main decisions and discussion points so the non-committee members are kept up to date with the work undertaken by each Board committee.

Below the Board committees are a number of management committees, including the Executive Committee. You can read more about some of the management committees, including the membership and operation of the Executive Committee, on page 63.

Reports from each of the Board committees together with details of their activities during the year are set out on the following pages.

Board and committee interactions

LOGO
 

 

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16

Corporate Governance49


Corporate Governancecontinued

Looking back. Examples of Board focus during the year included:

Areas of focus

Commentary

        NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15Cyber security  The Board is responsible for overseeing cyber security, and this year the Board has seen an increase in their focus on this issue. As mentioned in the Chairman’s letter, the cyber security team provided the Board with a detailed overview in relation to cyber security, so that the Board had increased visibility and understanding of the Company’s long-term strategy on cyber security.The focus was on the guiding principles and on determining what questions the Board should be asking of the cyber security team. The Board’s discussions concluded that they needed to have greater visibility of cyber security and there should be training for the Board members in dealing with cyber security risks.

41Proposed majority sale of the UK Gas Distribution businessThe Board regularly reviews the composition of the Company’s portfolio. As part of this review the Board received a strategy briefing in September, outlining the proposed commencement of a process for the potential sale of a majority stake in the UK Gas Distribution business.The discussion included: various transaction options; detailed financial impacts; significant challenges to be addressed; the communication strategy; return of proceeds to shareholders and the future dividend policy; and the transaction timeline. Following discussion and challenge on a number of issues, the Board unanimously agreed to the commencement of the sale process. The Board has been kept up to date on progress.

Principal risks and viabilityThe risk team provided updates on the UK Corporate Governance Code 2014 requirement for the Company to produce a viability statement. Discussions at Board meetings included: a review of the Company’s principal risks; the viability statement period; the management andmitigation of the principal risks; and how we would test the impact of the risks on the Company, including through the use of scenario planning. In May 2016, the Audit Committee recommended the viability statement to the Board which was approved.

US regulatory rate case filingsIn April 2015, the Board received an update on work being undertaken by the US finance and regulatory groups for the preparation of the Company’s first rate case filings since 2012. During the year the Board received regular progress reports on the rate case filings for our downstate New York gas companies, KEDNY and KEDLI, and also Massachusetts Electric. An overview of each filing was received by the Board before they were submitted,including a term sheet outlining the key metrics of each submission. An extension request for the rate case filing in Niagara Mohawk was also seen by the Board before filing. This extension proposed electricity and natural gas delivery prices for customers being frozen at current levels through to March 2018 while allowing the Company to increase investments to enhance its gas and electricity systems.

European energy and the politics of energyThe Board received an update on important UK and EU political developments prior to the UK General Election in May 2015. Following the General Election, the Board received a paper on the potential implications for the Company and an engagement plan. The Board was alsokept up to date on the referendum on the continued UK membership of the EU and the potential effects of exiting Europe, including on the development of interconnector projects and on our continuing involvement and benefits of being in the Integrated Energy Market.

The future of the System OperatorThe future of the SO has been considered previously by the Board and was reviewed again in detail in September 2015. In particular, Ofgem’s Integrated Transmission Planning and Regulation (ITPR) project and emerging DECC thinking on the possible creationof a ‘super System Operator’ were developments the Board considered. Additional updates on progress were provided in January, March and April 2016 when the Board received updates on future option modelling following discussions with Government.

UK onshore competitionIn addition to defining our role on the future of the SO, the Board has recently discussed the Company’s position on where consenting activity to support competitively tendered onshore transmission should be undertaken. In conclusion, the Company’s view was that competition should only be taken forward where it was in the interests of consumers.In March 2016, the Board discussed specific questions posed by Ofgem in relation to the Company’s position on onshore competition and discussed working with Ofgem to explore an enduring consenting solution, taking into account shareholder and consumer benefits.

Strategy sessionsIn addition to time allocated during the year at Board meetings, the Board participated in two interactive strategy sessions involving a combination of a full Board discussion and breakout groups. The Board’s focus was on thestate of the market in the UK and US, future opportunities for the Company including business development, merger and acquisition opportunities, and how the Company’s core capabilities could be used to best effect.

Site visits

In January 2016, the Non-executive Directors visited the Company’s UK cyber security operations centre, which provided an insight into its day-to-day operations and highlighted awareness of the direct security threats to the Company as they occur and are analysed 24 hours a day. Other visits by the Directors included safety site visits, including a visit to Power Plant Operations to celebrate over 10 years of no accidents, a field visit in Brooklyn to one of our LNG trucking provider locations to see facilities

and meet management, and a site tour in Eakring. Another visit was to the Western Link project to review the Scotland/England interconnector and new sub-station. In September 2016, the Board members will be visiting our Buffalo, New York office which will include a site tour. These visits provide the opportunity for Directors to meet local management teams, discuss aspects of the business with employees, and gain insight into our day-to-day business.

50National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Corporate Governance


LOGO

 

Corporate Governance contents

 

44Governance framework49Our Board and its committees
44Our Board50Audit Committee
45Board composition55Finance Committee
45Director induction and development56Safety, Environment and Health Committee
46Board and committee evaluation57Nominations Committee
46Non-executive Director independence58Board diversity and the Davies Review
46Director performance58Executive Committee
48Investor engagement59Management committees
48How our Board operates59Index to Directors’ Report and other disclosures
  60

Directors’ Remuneration Report

 

   Corporate Governance

In focus

346

meetings held with institutional and private investors during the year in 11 countries

LOGO

Further detail on

www.investors.nationalgrid.com

Looking forward. The Board’s focus for next year is expected to include:

regular reviews of safety activities;
updates on the UK Gas Distribution sale process;
European energy update following the outcome of the UK’s EU referendum;
UK and US operational business overviews;
continued detailed review of strategy and financing;
the outcome of US rate case filings;
implications of the ITPR project on our activities;
future options for the SO;
cyber security updates and training;
innovation;
results and follow up on the action planning from the external Board and committee evaluation;
the 2016 UK Winter Outlook; and
results of the 2016 employee engagement survey.

Directors’ induction programme

Following new appointments to the Board, the Chairman, Chief Executive and Group General Counsel & Company Secretary arrange a comprehensive induction programme. The programme is tailored based on experience and background and the requirements of the role.

John Pettigrew has been a Board member since April 2014. Following his succession to the role of Chief Executive he has been meeting external and internal stakeholders and external advisors and brokers as necessary. From 1 April 2016 John became a member of the Finance Committee and he will receive training and development as appropriate. He will also attend other committee meetings where appropriate. A tailored induction programme will be created for Nicola Shaw and monitored accordingly.

Director development and training

As our internal and external business environment changes, it is important to make sure that Directors’ skills and knowledge are refreshed and updated regularly. Our Chairman is responsible for the ongoing development of all Directors.

To strengthen the Directors’ knowledge and understanding of the Company, Board meetings regularly include updates and briefings on specific aspects of the Company’s activities, such as the development of our new cyber security programme and updates on the UK’s EU referendum. Updates on corporate governance and regulatory matters are also provided at Board meetings and there are training and development opportunities available for our Directors. Additionally, the Non-executive Directors are expected to visit at least one operational site annually.

Investor engagement

We believe it is important to maintain effective channels of communication with our debt and equity institutional investors and individual shareholders. This helps us to understand their views about the Company and allows us to make sure they are provided with timely and appropriate information on our strategy, performance, objectives, financing and other developments.

Institutional investors

We carry out a comprehensive engagement programme for institutional investors and research analysts, providing the opportunity for our current and potential investors to meet with executive and operational management.

This includes:

meetings, presentations and webinars;
attendance at investor conferences across the world;
holding road shows in major investor centres, mainly in the UK, Europe and the US; and
offering the opportunity for individual stewardship meetings.

In the last year, our engagement programme has focused on clarifying our Group growth expectations. This included communicating the rationale behind our decision to commence the proposed sale of the majority stake in our UK Gas Distribution business, and explaining to investors how we expect the Company to continue to perform against its regulatory contracts in both the UK and US businesses.

In November, we arranged a meeting in London to provide institutional investors and research analysts with an opportunity to meet our US leadership team, led by Dean Seavers, and to understand more about the current performance of our US business and its outlook. A copy of the presentation and associated materials are available in the Investors section of our website.

The Board receives regular feedback on investor perceptions and opinions about the Company. Specialist advisors and the Director of Investor Relations provide updates on market sentiment.

Additionally, each year, the Board receives the results of an independent audit of investor perceptions. Interviews are carried out with investors to establish their views on the performance of the business and management. The findings and recommendations of the audit are then discussed by the Board.

Debt investors

Over the last year senior group treasury representatives have met debt investors in Europe, Canada and the US to discuss various topics such as our full-year results and upcoming US rate case filings.

We also communicated with our debt investors through regular announcements and the debt investor section of our website. This contains bond information, credit ratings and materials relating to the subsidiary year-end reports. The website also contains information about our long-term debt maturity profile, so investors can see our future refinancing needs.

Individual shareholders

Engagement with individual shareholders, who represent more than 95% of the total number of shareholders on our share register, is led by the Group General Counsel & Company Secretary.

Shareholders are invited to learn more about the Company through our shareholder networking programme. The programme includes visits to UK operational sites and presentations by senior managers and employees over two days. UK resident shareholders can apply to take part in this programme via the Investors section of our website.

For information on the 2016 Annual General Meeting, please see page 66.

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Corporate Governance51


Corporate Governancecontinued

Board and committee membership and attendance

The table below sets out the Board and committee attendance during the year to 31 March 2016. Attendance is shown as the number of meetings attended out of the total number of meetings for the individual Director during the year.

If any Directors are unable to attend a meeting, they are encouraged to communicate their opinions and commentson the matters to be considered via the Chairman of the Board or the relevant committee chairman. Instances of non-attendance during the year were considered and determined as being reasonable in each case due to the individual circumstances. In relation to the Board meeting non-attendances, John Pettigrew and Steve Holliday were

precluded from attending the ad hoc Board meeting in November as it related to CEO succession and they were therefore both conflicted from attending. Dean Seavers was unable to attend a Board meeting due to personal reasons. Non-attendance at the Committee meeting was due to the short notice of the Nominations and Remuneration Committees ad hoc meetings and members having prior commitments, and also for personal reasons.

The Board has determined that Mark Williamson, Chairman of the Audit Committee, has recent and relevant financial experience; is a suitably qualified audit committee financial expert within the meaning of the SEC requirements; and is independent within the meaning of the New York Stock Exchange listing rules.

 Director  Board Meetings     Audit     Finance     Nominations     Remuneration     Safety,
Environment
& Health
 

 Sir Peter Gershon

   10 of 10                     7 of 7                

 Steve Holliday1

   9 of 10              3 of 4                       

 John Pettigrew2

   9 of 10                                     

 Andrew Bonfield

   10 of 10              4 of 4                     4 of 4  

 Dean Seavers

   9 of 10                                     

 Nora Mead Brownell

   10 of 10                     7 of 7       6 of 6       4 of 4  

 Jonathan Dawson

   10 of 10              4 of 4       7 of 7       6 of 6         

 Therese Esperdy

   10 of 10       5 of 5       4 of 4       7 of 7                

 Paul Golby

   10 of 10       5 of 5              7 of 7       5 of 6       4 of 4  

 Ruth Kelly

   10 of 10       5 of 5       4 of 4       6 of 7                

 Mark Williamson

   10 of 10       5 of 5              7 of 7       6 of 6         

 

 Attendance notes

 1. Steve Holliday stepped down as Chief Executive with effect from 31 March 2016.

 2. John Pettigrew became Chief Executive with effect from 1 April 2016.

 

  

  

  

Board and committee evaluation

We are back to the first year of the Company’s three-year performance evaluation cycle. The last externally facilitated evaluation took place in 2012/13. In line with the Code, for the year 2015/16 we have undertaken a formal and rigorous externally facilitated Board effectiveness review. We appointed Independent Audit to undertake the evaluation. Independent Audit, which has no other connection to the Company, considered the Board and committees’ performance with a particular focus on risk.

The evaluation was conducted between November 2015 and April 2016 and included:

an initial planning meeting with the Chairman, Group General Counsel & Company Secretary and Independent Audit to agree the approach and expectations of the evaluation;
one-to-one interviews based on the same set of questions conducted by Independent Audit with the Board members, Group General Counsel & Company Secretary, Head of Secretariat and other members of senior management who regularly interact with the Board and its committees;
Independent Audit attending the Board meeting in January to observe behaviours and interactions;
a review of the 2015 Board and committee papers and minutes, and a selection of other relevant governance documents to form a view of the effectiveness of the Board and its committees;
the preparation of a report by Independent Audit which was initially shared with the Chairman and Group General Counsel & Company Secretary; and
the presentation of results presented for discussion at the Board in April with the proposed recommendations presented in May.

The effectiveness of each of the Board committees was taken into account in the evaluation. All committees received an update on the external evaluation and discussed any recommended actions. The evaluation identified a number of specific recommendations to take forward for the Audit and Nominations Committees. Independent Audit concluded that the Board was working well even though it had seen changes in membership over the past few years and thought the Board now benefitted from a good mix of experience in both the UK and US. The Board agenda demonstrated there was balance between strategic, operational and regulatory matters, with good engagement of the Board members supported by thorough work by management. They also made a number of recommendations in relation to risk, principally focused on cascading risk management further down the business.

Actions for 2016/17

Independent Audit concluded there were six main recommendations for further development. In May the Board discussed and agreed the following actions:

to give a renewed push to improve Board and committee papers, including the enforcement of standards of papers and timely submissions;
to bring out strategic themes more clearly in the Board papers, pre-read papers and the Chief Executive’s report;
the Chairman will discuss with the Non-executive Directors the strategy items on the draft agenda for the next following meeting and articulate the views from the Non-executive Directors as to what is required at the Board meeting including any questions that need answering;
integrate risk more effectively into strategy development and planning;
continue to consider the skills and capabilities needed on the Board for executing the Company’s future strategy; and
to review whether there is enough focus on people on the Board agenda.

52National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Corporate Governance


   Corporate Governance

Board and

committee

evaluation cycle        

LOGO

Individual performance

As part of our annual evaluation process, Mark Williamson, as Senior Independent Director, led a review of the Chairman’s performance. The Non-executive Directors, with input from the Executive Directors, assessed his ability to fulfill his role as Chairman. It was concluded that the Chairman continued to show effective leadership of

the Board and his actions continued to influence the Board and the wider organisation. Mark Williamson discussed the feedback and development opportunities with the Chairman.

Progress against actions from 2014/15

Progress against the actions from last year’s internally facilitated evaluation have been monitored by the Group General Counsel & Company Secretary and the Chairman throughout the year and an update on progress was provided at the April Board meeting. A commentary against each action from last year’s review is set out below.

Last year an evaluation of committee performance was also conducted by the Chairman of each of the Board committees, following a similar process to that conducted by the Board. Where relevant, action plans were prepared for the committees and progress against the actions was monitored throughout the year.

Update on actions from last year

Area

Actions

Commentary

Environment

Optimise the boardroom layout to create a more inclusive environment for members and presenters.

Responsibility: Board members/ Group General Counsel & Company Secretary

For all meetings the Group General Counsel & Company Secretary makes sure the boardroom layout is appropriate to enable open discussion and promote an effective meeting. The Group General Counsel & Company Secretary also highlights any new presenters to the Board in the Chairman’s briefing material and the relevant Executive Director introduces the presenter to the meeting.

Environment

Continue to create a more open boardroom atmosphere and culture.

Responsibility: Chairman/ Board members

The Chairman manages the boardroom environment throughout meetings, encouraging open discussion on all matters and making sure all Board members are involved. A definite upward trend of contribution by all Board members has been seen. The Group General Counsel & Company Secretary makes sure there is appropriate time allocated to all agenda items and makes arrangements to foster an open atmosphere and culture.

Board discussions

Maximise the effectiveness of

Board discussions.

Responsibility: Chairman/ Executive Directors/Group General Counsel & Company Secretary

The information going to the Board is reviewed every six months through meetings between the Chairman, the Chief Executive and the Group General Counsel & Company Secretary. The new reporting framework delivered by external specialists last year has continued to provide the Board and committees with clearer, more concise papers. This has helped improve Board discussions and decision making. At the December 2015 Executive Committee meeting the Group General Counsel & Company Secretary updated the Executive members on the role they play in drafting the papers. We will continue to review and make sure only relevant information is provided to the Board. A further refresh of the Board paper process will commence this year.

After large discussion items, the Chairman summarises the key points from the discussion. He also confirms what is expected next, if anything, and if there are any actions for relevant Board members.

Board discussions

Use a diversity of thinking styles.

Responsibility: Chairman/ Board members

The Board members have become more flexible with their questioning taking into account their thinking styles, which varies according to the topic. At the post meetings with the Non-executive Directors, the Chairman makes sure they provide feedback on behaviours displayed during the meeting.

Board focus

Continue to manage the strategy agenda.

Responsibility: Chairman/ Chief Executive/Group General Counsel & Company Secretary

Significant time has been scheduled for strategy on the Board meeting agendas. In addition, we usually hold two half-day strategy sessions during the year which take place on a separate day to the Board meeting, to make sure the strategy discussions are productive and stimulating. In July 2016 there will be a full strategy away day.

Additionally, the Chief Executive has developed a detailed schedule of Board strategy updates for the forthcoming year and has recently circulated to the Board the material to be covered at the July strategy day.

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Board evaluation53


Corporate Governancecontinued

Mark Williamson

Committee chairman        

LOGO

Audit Committee

Review of the year

This report aims to provide an insight into the work of the Audit Committee over the year in relation to the UK and US businesses, the external auditors, and our role within the Company’s internal assurance functions, as well as the significant issues debated by the Committee during the year.

US business review

Last year, I reported on the work undertaken and progress made in relation to the US financial controls environment. This has remained a focus for the Committee this year and we expect the strengthened US leadership team to substantially complete the US finance transformation plan by 31 March 2017.

In September, the US finance senior leadership team joined the Committee meeting to give an in-depth update on the initiatives underpinning the US finance team transformation plan with each senior leader presenting on their area of responsibility. This provided us with an opportunity to hear directly from members of the team, raise questions and challenge as necessary.

I also took the opportunity in September to visit the Service Delivery Centre in Syracuse, New York to meet the US Shared Services and Finance teams. The visit highlighted the credit and collections process, a critical component of the larger revenue recognition process employed by the Company. I received presentations highlighting the work performed by each team, accomplishments, and areas of focus, together with an in-depth review of the credit and collections activities.

Additionally, in February I joined a video conference with the Finance Director and US finance leadership team for a progress update and to discuss the sustainable improvements being made to the overall US financial controls environment. The Finance Director and the US Chief Financial Officer have continued to keep the Committee up to date on progress with regular reports throughout the year on priorities and proposed improvements to support the transformation plan.

UK business review

While the US financial controls environment has remained an area of focus for the Committee, during the year we have also received regular updates of the overall Group control environment, including a presentation from the UK finance team on the status of the UK finance change programme.

Following the introduction of RIIO, the UK business has undergone significant change, which in turn demanded a different level of support from the UK finance team. The change programme is intended to improve the capability and capacity of the function to better support the business in a RIIO environment. The Committee challenged management on the status of the change programme and the revised processes and controls.

Audit tender

Overseeing the competitive tender process for the external audit was a significant undertaking for the Committee and management. You can read more about the process on page 56. I kept the Board up to date on our progress and in November recommended to the Board, for its consideration, that Deloitte LLP be appointed as our new external auditors. Our current auditors, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, will continue in their role and undertake the audit for the year ending 31 March 2017, subject to reappointment by shareholders at the 2016 AGM. The appointment of Deloitte will be recommended to our shareholders for consideration at the 2017 AGM. We look forward to working with Deloitte in the future.

Looking forward, we will continue to receive updates on the UK Gas Distribution sale and will support the Board as appropriate in relation to this potential transaction.

LOGO

Mark Williamson

Committee chairman

54National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Corporate Governance


   Corporate Governance

Examples of Committee focus during the year included:

Areas of focusCommentary

Risk management

The Committee has been delegated responsibility by the Board for monitoring and assessing the effectiveness of our risk management processes. During the year, the risk team undertook a review of our risk processes to make sure we have effective systems and processes in place to meet the requirements of the 2014 UK Corporate Governance Code and the FRC guidance on Risk Management, Internal Control and Related Financial and Business Reporting. Going forwards, the Committee will also receive reports to be considered by the Board on risk process developments to enable the Committee to keep fully appraised of changes in the risk profile of the Company and to allow it to monitor the management of risk throughout the year.

The Committee continues to monitor the effectiveness of the risk management and internal control processes during the year and reports to the Board on the outcome of its annual review which covers all material controls, including financial, operational and compliance controls.

You can read more about our risk management process and the review of effectiveness on pages 26 to 29. Details of our internal control systems, including those relating to the financial reporting process, can be found on pages 29 and 183.

Viability statement

Following the new requirement in the Code, the Annual Report and Accounts must now include a viability statement, which you can find on page 30.

The viability statement requires the Board to confirm that it has assessed the Company’s principal risks and viability. At its meeting in September, the Committee considered the outcome of a review of the Company’s

risk processes and proposed improvements to make sure there were effective systems and processes in place to support the Board in making this statement.

At the Committee meeting in May, it considered the viability statement and recommended the statement to the Board for approval at its May meeting.

Going concern statement

In addition, the Committee considered the Group’s short-term liquidity and capital and considered it appropriate to adopt the going concern basis in the financial statements. The Board considered and

approved the Committee’s recommendation at its May meeting. The Company’s going concern statement is set out on page 102, note 1A.

Fair, balanced and understandable

The Committee considered the requirement of the Code to ensure that the Annual Report and Accounts, taken as a whole, is fair, balanced and understandable in the

context of the applicable accounting standards and confirmed this view to the Board.

Financial reporting

The Committee monitors the integrity of the Company’s financial information and other formal documents relating to its financial performance and makes appropriate recommendations to the Board before publication.

An important factor in the integrity of financial statements is making sure that suitable and compliant accounting policies are adopted and applied consistently on a

year-on-year basis and across the Company. In this respect, the Committee also considers the estimates and judgements made by management when accounting for non-standard transactions, including the treatment of exceptional items. See page 57 for further details.

Disclosure Committee reports

When reviewing the half and full-year announcements, the Committee considers reports of the Disclosure Committee. The Disclosure Committee also reports the results of its evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s

disclosure controls to the Audit Committee. See page 63 for more information on the role of the Disclosure Committee.

Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 testing and attestations

The Committee receives regular updates on the status of testing and considers the impact of deficiencies reported in the past year.

See page 29 for the Company’s statement on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.

Cyber security risk management

Responsibility for reviewing the governance processes in relation to cyber security has been delegated to the Committee by the Board. An update on the status of our

cyber security risk management process and cyber security strategy was presented to the Committee in September.

Compliance management

Compliance management is part of the Global Assurance function, which incorporates ethics, risk management, licence management and records management. Biannual reports to the Committee focus on compliance with external legal obligations and regulatory commitments. Additional detail has been added to the reports this year, providing information on trends, root cause of incidents, and action tracking to help prioritise and prevent recurrence.

The Committee also received an update on the compliance improvement programme in September. The objective of the programme is to make sure the Company understands its external compliance obligations, that effective control frameworks are in place, and that compliance issues are managed with the right level of priority. The paper also set out the steps to help further embed compliance activities within the business. Strengthening existing control frameworks will be an important part of progressing compliance performance improvements in the business.

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16

Audit Committee

55


Corporate Governancecontinued

Areas of focus

Commentary

Confidential reporting procedures and whistleblowing

The Committee reviews these procedures annually to make sure that complaints are treated confidentially and that a proportionate, independent investigation is carried out in all cases.

The Committee also receives annual reports on the Company’s anti-bribery procedures and reviewed their adequacy. It noted that no material instances of non-compliance had been identified.

Internal audit charter

In accordance with best practice, the Corporate Audit Charter was reviewed against the Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) international standards and the IIA model charter.

This review assessed the purpose, authority and responsibility, as defined in the charter, to make sure they are sufficient to enable the Corporate Audit function to complete its objectives. Minor changes to the charter were approved by the Committee in November.

Performance review

The 2015/16 Board and committee evaluation was conducted externally by Independent Audit and included a high level review of the Board committees.

The recommended actions for the Audit Committee were considered by the Committee in May and an action plan agreed.

The Committee in action – audit tender

PwC have been the Company’s external auditors since the merger with Lattice Group plc in 2002, and were the incumbent external auditors of both the merging parties. Their performance has been reviewed annually by the Committee since that time.

As described in last year’s Annual Report and Accounts, it was decided to tender the audit this year having considered the Competition and Market Authority Order requiring FTSE 350 companies to hold an audit tender every 10 years as well as the final European Commission (EC) regulations, which came into EU legislation in June 2014. Based on the EC transitional arrangements, the final year in which PwC could have been appointed as the Group’s auditors would have been for the year ending 31 March 2020. As such PwC were not invited to be part of the tender process.

The following tender process was undertaken:

   a pre-qualification questionnaire was issued to interested parties;

   the submissions were scored by the finance and procurement teams against a detailed scoring mechanism focusing on areas such as audit quality, relevant industry experience and understanding of our business;

   the scores were presented to the Committee in July together with a proposed short list of firms; and

   at its July meeting, the Committee discussed and agreed the short list of firms and approved the issue of a formal Request for Proposal (RFP) to the short-listed firms.

The key stages of the RFP were as follows:

   meetings were held between the potential firms and members of the Board and senior finance team to set out the requirements for the audit and provide a better understanding of the expectations of key stakeholders and our business;

   references for the proposed key team members of each firm were sought;

   technologyworkshops were held with finance team members to give the potential firms the opportunity to demonstrate their audit technology tools and their relevance to the Company; and

   written tender documents were submitted by each firm covering specific areas including audit approach, risk identification, audit scope, independence and the proposed audit fee.

Throughout the process, we were mindful of the need to preserve the independence of the external audit. Each potential firm was required to disclose all existing relationships with the Company and explain their proposals to make sure these relationships would not cause any conflict of interest in line with SEC and proposed EU rules on auditor independence.

In early November, each potential firm presented to a panel (comprising the Committee, other members of the Board and senior finance team members and chaired by the Chairman of the Committee) setting out why they should be selected to be our external auditors. These sessions provided the panel with the opportunity to question each firm and follow up on queries from their written submissions.

The Committee discussed the outcome of the presentations and views of other members of the panel at its November meeting and recommended that Deloitte LLP was the most suitable firm to be our next auditors based on the principal evaluation criteria of audit quality, team experience and cultural fit. This recommendation from the Committee was subsequently approved by the Board at its November meeting.

Deloitte’s appointment, subject to approval at the 2017 AGM, will be effective for the year ending 31 March 2018. The timing of the change in auditors will help ensure both an orderly transition and compliance with external regulations on the provision of non-audit services.

PwC, National Grid’s current external auditor, will continue in their role until Deloitte’s appointment. They have expressed their willingness to continue as auditors of the Company for the year ending 31 March 2017 and the Committee has therefore recommended to the Board that a resolution proposing the re-appointment of PwC as external auditors be put to shareholders at the 2016 AGM. There are no contractual obligations restricting our choice of external auditors and we have not entered into any auditor liability agreement.

The Statutory Audit Services for Large Companies Market Investigation (Mandatory Use of Competitive Tender Processes and Audit Committee Responsibilities) Order 2014 – statement of compliance. The Company confirms that it complied with the provisions of the Competition and Markets Authority’s Order for the financial year under review.

56National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Corporate Governance


   Corporate Governance

Significant issues

The most significant issue the Committee considered in relation to the financial statements during the year was the US financial control environment and in particular these related to property, plant and equipment. The Committee also considered a paper presented by management highlighting the Company’s policy for presenting items as exceptional and the immediate accounting implications of the proposed sale of a majority stake in our UK Gas Distribution business.

The independent auditors’ report (pages 85 to 92) also includes some other areas of focus, including the accuracy and valuation of treasury derivative transactions, accounting for net pension obligations, revenue recognition, and valuation of environmental provisions which were not considered in detail by the Committee during the year, as nothing significant arose that warranted extensive Committee attention.

US financial control environment

The Committee has continued to devote a significant amount of time to reviewing the actions management are taking to improve the US financial controls environment. The two main areas of focus and challenge by the Committee on this issue were:

progress made by management against the measures taken to remediate the US financial control deficiencies. In particular the Committee asked management to produce a clear timetable for clearing the control deficiencies; and
the status of the US finance organisational design programme, in particular, understanding the structure of the new US finance senior leadership team and management’s plans to fill key vacancies.

Presentation of exceptional items

There were two specific items that the Committee considered this year in respect of exceptional items:

as part of the half-year results announcement, the Committee considered the treatment of the £49m gain recognised when National Grid exchanged its share of the Iroquois pipeline joint venture for shares in Dominion Midstream Partners, LP. The Committee was satisfied that this item should not be recognised as exceptional based on the size of the transaction; and
at year end, the Committee considered the treatment of the costs incurred in preparation for the UK Gas Distribution sale. The Committee agreed with management’s proposal that these be treated as exceptional to reflect the nature of the costs. This presentation would be consistent with the treatment of the overall profit on the sale when the transaction completes.

Potential sale of majority stake in the UK Gas Distribution business

The Committee considered the immediate accounting implications following the announcement of the sale plans in November. In particular, the Committee was satisfied with the conclusion reached that, based on the separation work remaining and the overall status of the transaction, the assets and liabilities did not need to be classified as held for sale at 31 March 2016. The Committee will continue to monitor this during 2016/17 as the potential transaction progresses.

External audit

The Committee is responsible for overseeing relations with the external auditors, including the proposed external audit plan, the approval of fees, and makes recommendations to the Board on their appointment or reappointment. Details of total remuneration paid to auditors for the year, including audit services, audit-related services and other non-audit services, can be found in note 3(e) of the consolidated financial statements on page 110.

Auditor independence and objectivity

The independence of the external auditors is essential to the provision of an objective opinion on the true and fair view presented in the financial statements. Auditor independence and objectivity is safeguarded by a number of control measures, including:

limiting the nature and value of non-audit services performed by the external auditors;
ensuring that employees of the external auditors who have worked on the audit in the past two years are not appointed to senior financial positions within the Company in line with our internal code;
monitoring the changes in legislation related to auditor objectivity and independence to help ensure we remain compliant;
providing a business conduct helpline that employees can use to report any concerns, including those relating to the relationships between Company personnel and the external auditor;
the rotation of the lead engagement partner at least every five years (a new lead engagement partner was appointed for the 2015/16 financial year);
PwC’s internal independence rules and processes, which have been designed to exceed professional standards and focus on both personal independence and scope of services;
independent reporting lines from PwC to the Committee and the opportunity to meet with the Committee independently; and
an annual review by the Committee of the structures, policies and practices in place to make sure the external auditors’ objectivity and independence is maintained.

Audit quality

To maintain audit quality and provide comfort on the integrity of financial reporting, the Committee reviews and challenges the proposed external audit plan, including its scope and materiality prior to approval, to make sure that PwC has identified all key risks and developed robust audit procedures and communication plans.

The Committee also considers PwC’s response to accounting, financial control and audit issues as they arise, and meets with them at least annually without management present, providing the external auditors with the opportunity to raise any matters in confidence.

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Audit Committee57


Corporate Governancecontinued

Auditor appointment

An annual review is conducted by the Committee of the level and makeup of the external audit and non-audit fees and the effectiveness, independence and objectivity of the external auditors.

The annual review includes consideration of:

audit quality and the external audit process globally;
the auditors’ performance and delivery against the audit plan;
the expertise of the firm and our relationship with them including the level of challenge; and
the initial results of online questionnaires completed by the Chairman, Committee members, Executive Directors and senior representatives from the finance team. The questions focused on: the quality of service; sufficiency of resources; planning and execution of the audit; communication and interaction; and overall satisfaction.

Following this year’s annual review, the Committee was satisfied with the effectiveness, independence and objectivity of the external auditors, and recommended to the Board their reappointment for a further year. A resolution to reappoint PwC and giving authority to the Directors to determine their remuneration will be submitted to shareholders at the 2016 AGM.

Internal (corporate) audit

The corporate audit function provides independent, objective assurance to the Audit, Safety, Environment and Health and Executive Committees on whether our existing control and governance frameworks are operating effectively in order to meet our strategic objectives. Assurance work is conducted and managed in accordance with the IIA international standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing and Code of Ethics.

To keep the Committee informed of trends identified from the assurance work and to update on progress against the corporate audit plan, the Head of Corporate Audit reports to the Committee at least twice each year. These reports present information on specific audits, as appropriate, summarise common control themes arising from the work of the team and update on progress with implementing management actions. Where control issues are identified, senior leaders may be invited to attend Committee meetings to provide commentary on the actions they are taking to improve the control environment within their area of responsibility.

In order to meet the objectives set out in the Corporate Audit Charter, audits of varying types and scopes are conducted as part of the annual corporate audit plan. The audit plan is based on a combination of risk-based and cyclical reviews, together with a small amount of work that is mandated, typically by US regulators.

Inputs to the audit plan include risk registers, corporate priorities, external research of emerging risks and trends, and discussions with senior management to make sure the plan aligns with the Committee and Company’s view of risk. The audit plan is considered and approved by the Committee annually and progress against the plan is monitored throughout the year.

The Committee is responsible for the appointment and removal of the Head of Corporate Audit. The Committee met privately with the Head of Corporate Audit during the year.

Non-audit services provided by the external auditors

In accordance with our policy, non-audit services provided by the external auditors above a threshold of £50,000 require approval in advance by the Committee.

Below this threshold, all requests must be approved in advance by the Finance Director but do not require Committee pre-approval. This reduces the administrative burden on the Committee. A full list of all Committee and Finance Director approved non-audit work requests is presented to the Committee annually to ensure the Committee is aware of all non-audit services provided.

Additionally, the Committee receives quarterly reports from management on non-audit services and other consultants’ fees to monitor the types of services being provided and fees incurred.

Approval for the provision of non-audit services is given on the basis the service will not compromise independence and is a natural extension of the audit, or if there are overriding business or efficiency reasons making the external auditors most suited to provide the service. Certain services are prohibited from being performed by the external auditors, as required under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002.

Total non-audit services provided by PwC during the year ended 31 March 2016 were £8.9 million (2015: £0.9 million), representing 63% (2015: 7%) of total audit and audit-related fees (see note 3(e)). The increase in the year relates to two significant projects: vendor due diligence and separation support in respect of the potential UK Gas Distribution transaction and ‘data scrub’ work on financial information prior to inclusion in US rate case filings. For both of these projects it was concluded that the work would be most efficiently performed by the external auditor based on their understanding of our businesses and that most of the information used was derived from audited financial statements. Both projects were discussed by the Committee and pre approved by the Chairman of the Audit Committee prior to work commencing.

Total audit and audit-related fees include the statutory fee and fees paid to PwC for other services that the external auditors are required to perform, such as regulatory audits and Sarbanes-Oxley Act attestation. Non-audit fees represent all other services provided by PwC not included in the above.

Non-audit services provided by PwC in the year included tax compliance services in territories other than the US (£0.5 million), the significant majority of which related to the UK.

The Committee considered that tax compliance services were most efficiently provided by the external auditors, as much of the information used in preparing computations and returns was derived from audited financial information. In order to maintain the external auditors’ independence and objectivity, management reviewed and considered PwC’s findings and PwC did not make any decisions on behalf of management.

58National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Corporate Governance


   Corporate Governance

Therese Esperdy

Committee chairman        

LOGO

Finance Committee

Review of the year

This was my first full year as Committee chairman, during which we have focused on our funding programme taking into account international market conditions, as well as overseeing the early stages of the treasury and other finance related aspects of the proposed sale of a majority stake in our UK Gas Distribution business.

At the end of the year, we said farewell to Steve Holliday as a member of the Committee as he stepped down from his Chief Executive role, and from the start of April we welcomed John Pettigrew to the Committee as he transitioned into that role. I would like to thank Steve for his contribution to this Committee as part of his wider leadership of National Grid over many years.

2015/16 has also seen changes within the treasury team, with a new Group Tax and Treasury Director taking on the role in early 2016. With accompanying changes in the UK and US treasury teams I look forward to working with the new management team to build on the strong base they have inherited.

The Committee has met with management and employees across the treasury, tax, pensions and insurance functions in both the UK and US through the course of our routine meetings. In addition, all members of the Committee met separately with the new Group Tax and Treasury Director as part of his induction into the role.

As part of our continuous review of counterparty risk, in June we received a presentation from external advisors on the banking market initiatives designed to improve the capital position of banks. Following the Committee’s approval to simplify our liquidity policies last year, the revised policy was successfully implemented and we reviewed performance during the year.

The Committee approved the issuance of a non-dilutive convertible bond in September. This innovative funding transaction demonstrates our focus on funding diversification and cost effectiveness, and was recognised with the Deal of the Year Award for 2015 by the Association of Corporate Treasurers.

During the year, the Committee received an update on the activities and performance of our captive insurance companies, which highlighted the cost savings generated by these arrangements. We also reviewed the future strategy for the insurance function, our outsource arrangements, and the ongoing plans for the captive insurance companies.

In the second half of the year, the Committee spent time on the financing related aspects of the proposed sale of a majority stake in our UK Gas Distribution business. This included reviewing the pension and tax aspects of the proposed transaction, together with planning our approach to the associated liability management exercise. This will continue to be a major focus for the Committee in the year ahead.

In April 2016, the Committee received an external update on the potential impact of the forthcoming referendum on the UK’s membership of the European Union. We assessed the treasury and other issues that might arise, together with their potential impact on the Company.

We will also continue to review our ongoing funding needs, liquidity management, pension funding and our future insurance strategy.

Examples of key matters the Committee considered during the year included:

funding requirements and financing for the business plan;
setting and reviewing treasury policies;
treasury performance updates;
UK and US tax updates;
update on US energy procurement activities and electricity and gas trading activities in the UK;
foreign exchange policy and interest rate risk management;
the draft going concern statement for the half- andfull-year results prior to consideration by the Board;
update on pension and post-retirement healthcare arrangements; and
insurance renewal programme and overall insurance strategy.

The Committee in action –

rebalancing our debt portfolio

The Committee has had oversight of management’s plans to rebalance our debt portfolio relating to the potential sale of a majority stake in our UK Gas Distribution business.

We initially reviewed and challenged management’s overall strategy for the restructuring programme, and subsequently received presentations over multiple meetings on the proposed methodology and risks associated with delivering it.

Various options were considered and we concurred with management’s proposed approach on this important issue. We will continue to oversee progress in the coming year.

LOGO

Therese Esperdy

Committee chairman

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Finance Committee59


Corporate Governancecontinued

Paul Golby

Committee chairman        

LOGO

Safety, Environment and

Health Committee

Review of the year

Over the year the Safety, Environment and Health Committee has seen the Company make further progress in process safety management and the safety performance of both the UK and US businesses. The US has closed the gap on the UK in terms of combined employee and contractor Lost Time Injuries and the Company overall now has an injury frequency rate of 0.10.

Road traffic collisions remain higher than we would like in both the UK and the US. Starting in the UK, the Company has therefore required many of its employees to attend safe driver training with the aim of reducing incidents. We have also benchmarked our approach to safe driving externally and ascertained that it represents good industry practice.

The Committee receives reports from the Engineering Assurance Committee (EAC) every six months. In particular, we considered work being done by the EAC in succession planning for the Company’s engineering employee population. Following recommendations from the Committee, the collection and analysis of data on the Company’s engineers was accelerated to facilitate the development of a strategy for recruitment and retention of employees, which recognises the value of engineering qualifications particularly in relation to safety critical roles.

We have continued to focus on process safety and establishing a safety management system across both UK and US businesses. We also received reports on the measures being introduced at key US LNG plants located close to areas that have pockets of relatively dense population. This includes the installation of automatic shutdown mechanisms and, for four plants, dike remodelling to improve the containment of LNG in the low probability event of an incident.

We continued to monitor the Company’s approach to compliance with US gas safety regulations (see the ‘Committee in action’ box opposite). The Committee spent time reviewing how the Company benchmarks its performance against that of other bodies, both in the utilities’ sector and elsewhere in the fields of safety, environment and health. It also considered other areas in which it may be beneficial to extend such benchmarking.

In terms of the environment, we have continued to monitor our strategy and approach to sustainability. In particular, we have looked at how we are working with governments and bodies to influence regulations that directly affect our business.

Our performance to date in reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions has been successful and we expect to exceed our 2020 reduction target significantly. However,

the necessary reductions in GHG emissions to meet our 2050 target will be a greater challenge. Following the UN Climate Change Conference in Paris in December 2015 (COP21), the Committee met to consider the outcomes of the conference and how these affect the Company.

Further work is planned for 2016/17, as the impact on national legislation is expected to become clearer and we review our emissions reduction strategy and our ability to meet our 2050 GHG reduction targets.

We also considered the Company’s health and wellbeing strategy and the work being undertaken to improve data management, implement better line management awareness training and provide support and guidance to employees.

Examples of other matters the Committee reviewed during the year included:

ongoing monitoring of safety performance and significant incidents in the UK and US;
update on lessons learnt and steps taken following a fatality of a member of the public in the UK in April 2014, for which the Company was fined £2m in December 2015;
compliance and risk reporting for safety, environment and health;
the introduction and application by the Company of the accounting for sustainability (A4S) methodology for new projects;
programmes for musculo-skeletal injury prevention and mental well-being in the UK; and
the impact that the so called ‘Obama Care’ laws may have on the provision of health care plans for our US employees.

The Committee in action – US gas pipeline safety management

Following several years of very significant pipeline incidents, the US Congress and regulators have changed their approach to enforcing gas pipeline safety legislation, becoming impatient with companies that are not showing continuous improvement in compliance-related matters. This is demonstrated by a recent series of compliance orders in New York State, record-setting penalties nationwide and further demands for compliance improvement plans.

The Company’s response has been to heighten its focus on compliance and investment in people, training and systems to meet these requirements through new gas enablement initiatives and the setting up of a gas pipeline safety monitoring system. This will involve using the Company’s process safety management system and expanding its approach to gas distribution assets. The US business has reviewed its standards and procedures and has worked to build a consistent and integrated approach to gas pipeline safety compliance across the Company.

Over the past couple of years, the Committee has monitored the progress of these measures, stressing the importance of compliance with legislation rather than tolerance of fines. It has encouraged the Company to improve communications with regulators in order to help shape solutions to evolving regulatory issues. These include recent changes to New York State’s definition of service lines, affecting where jurisdictional piping responsibility ends and therefore where the Company’s responsibility for gas pipeline safety commences and ends.

LOGO

Paul Golby

Committee chairman

60National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Corporate Governance


   Corporate Governance

Sir Peter Gershon

Committee chairman        

LOGO

Nominations Committee

Review of the year

During the year, succession planning has been the main area of focus for the Committee. The process of building a strong and effective Board requires a good balance of continuity and refreshment and the Committee has borne this in mind in its deliberations.

Appointment of new Chief Executive

As described in my foreword to the Corporate Governance report, during the year we have undertaken a rigorous recruitment process to appoint a successor to Steve Holliday, which resulted in the appointment of John Pettigrew as our new Chief Executive. You can read more about the Chief Executive succession search and appointment process in the ‘Committee in action’ box opposite.

Succession planning

The Committee also spent time considering succession planning over the long term, for both Executive and Non-executive Director positions, to make sure we have the right mix of skills and experience for the future. The main focus of these discussions was to take account of the recruitment process for the Chief Executive role and subsequently the appointment of our new Executive Director, UK, following John’s appointment as Chief Executive. Following a thorough and rigorous appointment process, Nicola Shaw was appointed to the role of Executive Director, UK and we will be welcoming Nicola on to the Board from 1 July 2016; see opposite for more details on this search and appointment process.

Diversity

Balance and fit with current Board members are important considerations in recruitment to the Board. Therefore part of the selection process for Board appointments is for the Committee to review the existing skills and experience of the Board and to also undertake external benchmarking and a review of potential external candidates. The Board also takes into account the need to make sure there is appropriate diversity, including diversity in thinking styles. Further details on the Company’s approach to diversity are set out overleaf.

Board and Committee membership

Following the changes in Board membership, the composition of the committees was also reviewed. As a result of his appointment as Chief Executive, John Pettigrew joined the Finance Committee with effect from 1 April 2016.

Examples of other matters the Committee considered during the year included:
● Executive succession planning focusing on the identification, development and readiness of successors to the Executive Committee in particular; and
● a review of the Chairman’s performance, led by Mark Williamson, the Senior Independent Director.

The Committee in action – Chief Executive succession search and appointment process

A formal process was undertaken by the Committee over a three year period in order to find an appropriate successor to Steve Holliday as Chief Executive. Luke Meynell, an external advisor, initially of Russell Reynolds Associates and subsequently of The Zygos Partnership, supported the Committee to make sure there was rigour and challenge to our process which was as follows:

a Chief Executive role profile was prepared and agreed by the Committee;
the external advisor conducted initial searches and assessed a long list of internal and external candidates against the agreed profile to produce a shortlist of potential candidates;
shortlisted internal candidates were considered and interviews and assessments were undertaken;
the Chairman and some of the Non-executive Directors met the potential external candidates;
following a review of the ratings from all the interviews and assessments the Committee agreed its preferred internal candidate;
the preferred candidate was benchmarked against external candidates;
following discussion of the impact of the proposed appointment on the succession plans of the Company, the Committee confirmed its preferred candidate and recommended John Pettigrew for appointment as Chief Executive to the Board;
the Board approved the appointment as recommended.

Search and appointment process

Executive Director, UK

A formal recruitment process was also undertaken for the replacement of John Pettigrew as Executive Director, UK, as follows.

The Nominations Committee appointed Korn Ferry as the search consultancy. With input from the Committee members a role and person specification was agreed.

Korn Ferry conducted initial searches for potential external candidates, with eight candidates being put forward for the role. Following this, a series of interviews were undertaken by the Chairman and members of the Board and Executive Committee. The Committee considered the outcomes from the interviews and selected two candidates for further consideration.

Final interviews with the two candidates were carried out by Steve Holliday, John Pettigrew, Ruth Kelly, Mark Williamson and members of the Executive Committee. Additionally, the two shortlisted candidates were externally assessed by YSC, a business management consultancy that undertakes executive director profiling assessments.

Following discussion, the Nominations Committee recommended Nicola Shaw as its preferred candidate for appointment to the Board. The Board approved the appointment as recommended and Nicola will join the Board on 1 July 2016.

In addition to providing external search consultancy services to the Company, Korn Ferry also provide HR consultancy services.

LOGO

Sir Peter Gershon

Chairman

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Nominations Committee61


Corporate Governancecontinued

Board diversity and the Davies Review

At National Grid, we believe that creating an inclusive and diverse culture supports the attraction and retention of talented people, improves effectiveness, delivers superior performance and enhances the success of the Company.

Our Board diversity policy promotes this culture and reaffirms our aspiration to meet and exceed the target of 25% of Board positions being held by women by 2015, as set out by Lord Davies. In October 2015, Lord Davies published his final report on women in the boardroom and recommended a new voluntary target of 33% of board positions to be held by women by 2020. In April 2016, the Nominations Committee discussed progress made against our Board diversity policy and noted the new target.

We currently have 27% women on our Board and 22% women on our Executive Committee. The number of women in senior management positions and throughout the organisation is set out on page 45 along with examples of the initiatives to promote and support inclusion and diversity throughout our Company.

In February 2014, the Nominations Committee set out eight measurable objectives to support our Board diversity policy. During the year, the Committee reviewed the Board diversity policy and progress made against the objectives which support the implementation of the policy as set out below.

ObjectivesProgress

1The Board aspired to exceed the target of 25% of Board positions to be held by women by 2015.

Objective met. We currently have 27% women on our Board, which will increase to 33% when Nicola Shaw joins in July 2016. Lord Davies recommended in his final report that the target be increased to a voluntary 33% target by 2020. The Board has noted this new target.

2

All Board appointments will be made on merit, in the context of the skills and experience that are needed for the Board to be effective.

Objective met. The appointment of John Pettigrew as Chief Executive and Nicola Shaw as Executive Director, UK were made on merit.

3We will only engage executive search firms who have signed up to the Voluntary Code of Conduct on Gender Diversity.

Objective met. Korn Ferry, Russell Reynolds Associates and The Zygos Partnership are signed up to the Voluntary Code of Conduct on Gender Diversity.

4

Where appropriate, we will assist with the development and support of initiatives that promote gender and other forms of diversity among our Board, Executive Committee and other senior management.

Objective met. See page 44 for further details.

5Where appropriate, we will continue to adopt best practice in response to the Davies Review.

Ongoing – as appropriate. The Nominations Committee reviewed and noted the recommendations of the Lord Davies report published in October 2015 and best practice will be adopted as appropriate and reported on next year.

6

We will review our progress against the Board diversity policy annually.

Objective met. Ongoing.

7

We will report on our progress against the policy and our objectives in the Annual Report and Accounts along with details of initiatives to promote gender and other forms of diversity among our Board, Executive Committee and other senior management.

Objective met. Ongoing.

8

We will continue to make key diversity data, both about the Board and our wider employee population, available in the Annual Report and Accounts.

Objective met. Ongoing.

Progress against the objectives, the policy and the new targets will continue to be reviewed annually and reported in the Annual Report and Accounts.

62National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Corporate Governance


   Corporate Governance

Executive Committee membership key

1 John Pettigrew

Chief Executive and Committee chairman

2 Andrew BonfieldFinance Director

3 Stephanie HazellGroup Strategy & CorporateDevelopment Director

4 Alison KayGroup General Counsel & Company Secretary

5 Richard Adduci

Chief Information Officer

6 George Mayhew

Group Corporate Affairs Director

7 Dean SeaversExecutive Director, US

8 Mike Westcott

Group Human Resources Director

9 Steve Holliday

Executive Director

LOGO

Management committees

To help make sure we allocate time and expertise appropriately, the Company has a number of management committees, which include the Executive Committee, Disclosure Committee, Investment Committee, Group Ethics and Compliance Committee, Global Retirement Plan Committee and Group Security, and Resilience Committee. These committees provide reports, where relevant, to the appointing committee in line with our governance framework on the responsibilities they have been delegated. See page 49 for management committee reporting lines.

Executive Committee

Led by the Chief Executive, the Executive Committee oversees the safety, operational and financial performance of the Company. It is responsible for making day-to-day management and operational decisions it considers necessary to safeguard the interests of the Company and to further the strategy, business objectives and targets established by the Board. It approves expenditure and other financial commitments within its authority levels and discusses, formulates and approves proposals to be considered by the Board.

There are currently nine Committee members, with Steve Holliday remaining a member of the Committee until he leaves the Company in July 2016. As previously announced, Nicola Shaw will become a member of the Committee with effect from 1 July 2016, on joining the Company as Executive Director, UK. The Committee members have a broad range of skills and expertise, which are updated through training and development. Some members also hold external non-executive directorships, giving them valuable board experience. The Committee officially met 12 times this year, but the members interact much more regularly. Those members of the Committee who are not Directors regularly attend Board and committee meetings for specific agenda items. This means that knowledge is shared and all members are kept up to date with business activities and developments.

Disclosure Committee

The role of the Disclosure Committee is to assist the Chief Executive and the Finance Director in fulfilling their responsibility for overseeing the accuracy and timeliness of the disclosures made – whether in connection with our presentations to analysts, financial reporting obligations, or other material stock exchange announcements, including the disclosure of price sensitive information.

This year the Committee met to consider the announcements of the full- and half-year results and reported on relevant matters to the Audit Committee. In doing so it spent time considering the Company’s disclosure obligations relating to the announcement of the proposed UK Gas Distribution sale process and the expected impact this would have on the Company’s growth rate.

The Committee also reports the results of its evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls to the Audit Committee.

The Committee is chaired by the Finance Director and its members are the Group General Counsel & Company Secretary, the Global Tax and Treasury Director, the Global Financial Controller, the Director of Investor Relations, the Head of Corporate Audit and the Deputy Group General Counsel, with other attendees as appropriate.

The Committee in action – rate case filings

During the year, the Committee reviewed and discussed our proposed rate case filings for both Massachusetts electricity operations (MECO) and our downstate New York gas companies (KEDNY/KEDLI). These filings aim to increase our allowed revenue in line with increased operating costs since base rates were reset after the last full rate review for each company (2010 for MECO, 2008 for KEDNY/KEDLI) and also to fund future investment needed to meet our customers’ requirements and improve reliability.

A key focus of the Committee discussions was on understanding the impact of the requested rate increases on our customers, and considering stakeholder perspectives. Following discussion, the proposals were approved for filing at the October meeting for MECO and at the January meeting for KEDNY/KEDLI.

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Management committees63


Corporate Governancecontinued

Statement of compliance with the UK

Corporate Governance Code

The UK Listing Rules require that listed companies must include in their annual report a statement of whether the Company has complied with all the relevant provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code. The UK Corporate Governance Code was published in September 2014 (the Code), available in full atwww.frc.org.uk.

For the year ended 31 March 2016, the Board considers that it has complied in full with the provisions of the Code. Our statement of compliance opposite explains the main aspects of the Company’s governance structure to give a greater understanding of how the Company has applied the principles and complied with the provisions in the Code. The main report also explains compliance with the Disclosure Rules and Transparency Rules. The index on page 67 sets out where to find each of the disclosures required in the Directors’ Report in respect of Listing Rule 9.8.4, together with the Board’s sign-off on the report.

A. Leadership

A.1 The role of the Board

Our Board is collectively responsible for the effective oversight of the Company and its businesses. It also determines the strategic direction, business plan, objectives, principal risks, viability of the Company and governance structure that will help achieve the long-term success of the Company and deliver sustainable shareholder value.

The Board sets the risk appetite and principal risks for the Company and takes the lead in areas such as safeguarding the reputation of the Company and its financial policy, as well as making sure we maintain a sound system of internal control and risk management (see pages 26 to 29).

There is a clear schedule of matters reserved for the Board and a schedule of delegation, which were both updated in January 2016. The schedule of matters reserved for the Board is available on our website, together with other governance documentation.

A.2 A clear division of responsibilities

The Board supports the separation of the roles of the Chairman and Chief Executive. The key responsibilities are clearly documented and reviewed when appropriate. The Chairman manages and leads the Board. The Chief Executive is responsible for the executive leadership and day-to-day management of the Company and the Group’s businesses, to ensure the delivery of the strategy agreed by the Board.

A.3 Role of the Chairman

The Chairman, who was independent on appointment, is responsible for the leadership and management of the Board and its governance. He makes sure the Board is effective in its role by promoting a culture of openness and debate, facilitating the effective contribution of all Directors and helping to maintain constructive relations between Executive and Non-executive Directors. The Chairman sets the Board’s agenda making sure consideration is given to the main challenges and opportunities facing the Company, and adequate time is available to discuss all items, including strategic issues.

A.4 Role of the Non-executive Directors

Our Senior Independent Director acts as a sounding board for the Chairman and serves as an intermediary for the other Directors, as well as shareholders when required.

Independent of management, our Non-executive Directors bring diverse skills and experience, vital to constructive challenge and debate. Exclusively, they form the Audit, Nominations and Remuneration Committees, and their views are actively sought when developing proposals on strategy.

Around the Board meetings, the Chairman holds meetings with the Non-executive Directors without the Executive Directors present.

64National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16

Corporate Governance


   Corporate Governance

B. Effectiveness

B.1 The composition of the Board

The Board believes it operates effectively with an appropriate balance of independent Non-executive and Executive Directors who have the right balance of skills, experience, independence and knowledge of the Company.

Details of our Board, their individual biographies and Committee membership are set out on pages 47 and 48. Board and Committee attendance during the year to 31 March 2016 is set out on page 52.

The independence of the Non-executive Directors is considered at least annually along with their character, judgement, commitment and performance on the Board and relevant committees. The Board took into consideration the Code and indicators of potential non-independence, including length of service.

The Board considered Paul Golby’s independence separately following the announcement of his appointment as Chairman of Costain Group plc (a major supplier to the Company). The situational conflict was authorised (including putting in place protective measures to ensure the conflict is appropriately managed) and his independence was confirmed.

At year end, all of the Non-executive Directors, with the exception of the Chairman, who’s independence is only determined on appointment, have been determined by the Board to be independent.

B.2 Appointments to the Board

The Nominations Committee, which comprises the Chairman and Non-executive Directors leads the process for Board appointments and makes recommendations to the Board. The process for the appointment of John Pettigrew as Chief Executive and Nicola Shaw as Executive Director, UK were formal, rigorous and transparent. Further details of each appointment process, succession planning and the role of the Nominations Committee can be found on page 61.

B.3 Time commitment

Non-executive Directors are advised of the time commitment expected from them on appointment. External commitments, which may impact existing time commitments, must be agreed with the Chairman. Details of external appointments are set out in the biographies on pages 47 and 48.

As part of the evaluation of the Chairman, the Non-executive Directors, with input from the Executive Directors, assessed his ability to fulfill his role as Chairman, taking into account other significant appointments.

With the agreement of the Board, Executive Directors gain experience of other companies’ operations, governance frameworks and boardroom dynamics through non-executive appointments. The fees for these positions are retained by the individual.

For further details about the Directors’ service contracts and letters of appointment, see page 74 of the Directors’ Remuneration Report.

B.4 Development

All new Directors are provided with a full induction programme when they are appointed to the Board. Details of Director induction and development can be found on page 51.

B.5 Information and support

The Group General Counsel & Company Secretary makes sure that appropriate and timely information is provided to the Board and its Committees and is responsible for advising and supporting the Chairman and the Board on all governance matters. All Directors have access to the Group General Counsel & Company Secretary and may take independent professional advice at the Company’s expense in conducting their duties.

To support discussion and decision making, Board and committee members receive papers sufficiently in advance of meetings so that they can prepare for and consider agenda items. Additionally, the Chairman holds a short meeting with the Non-executive Directors before each Board meeting to discuss the focus of the upcoming meeting as well as afterwards to share feedback from the meeting. Similarly, the Chief Executive holds a short meeting with the Executive Directors and the Group General Counsel & Company Secretary after each meeting and shares the feedback from these meetings with the Chairman.

Last year we engaged external specialists to review our current papers and develop a new reporting framework for the Board and its Committees. This has continued to result in clearer more concise reporting, allowing more time for quality discussions and questions. A clear set of guidelines are in place to assist the Executive Directors and management on the content and presentation of papers to the Board and committees. A further refresh of the Board paper process will commence this year.

B.6 Evaluation

See pages 52 and 53 for more information on our externally facilitated Board evaluation, undertaken by Independent Audit Limited.

During the year, the Chairman met each Director individually to discuss their contribution, performance over the year and training and development needs. Following these meetings, Sir Peter confirmed to the Nominations Committee that he considered that each Director demonstrated commitment to the role and their performance continued to be effective.

At a private meeting of the Non-executive Directors, Mark Williamson, as Senior Independent Director, led a review of the Chairman’s performance. The Non-executive Directors, with input from the Executive Directors, assessed his ability to fulfil his role as Chairman and considered the arrangements he has in place, given he is also chairman of a FTSE 250 company and the Aircraft Carrier Alliance Management Board and a Trustee of The Sutton Trust Board. They concluded that Sir Peter’s performance continued to be effective.

B.7 Election/re-election

Each Director is subject to election at the first AGM following their appointment, and re-election at each subsequent AGM. Following recommendations from the Nominations Committee the Board considers all Directors continue to be effective, committed to their roles and have sufficient time available to perform their duties. Therefore, in accordance with the Code, Nicola Shaw will seek election and all other Directors will seek re-election at the 2016 AGM as set out in the Notice of Meeting, with the exception of Steve Holliday who is retiring from the Company with effect from 22 July 2016.

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Statement of compliance with the UK Corporate Governance Code65


Corporate Governancecontinued

Statement of compliance with the UK

Corporate Governance Codecontinued

C. Accountability

D. Remuneration

E. Relations with shareholders

C.1 Financial and business reporting

The requirement for Directors to state that they consider the Annual Report and Accounts, taken as a whole, is fair, balanced and understandable remains a key consideration in the drafting and review process. The coordination and review of the Annual Report is conducted in parallel with the formal audit process undertaken by the external auditors and the review by the Board and its committees (of relevant sections).

The drafting and assurance process supports the Audit Committee’s and Board’s assessment of the overall fairness, balance and clarity of the Annual Report and the statement of Directors’ responsibilities as set out on page 84. The independent auditor’s report is on pages 85 to 92 and the Company’s business model is on pages 14 and 15.

C.2 Risk management and internal control

The Board has carried out a robust assessment of the principal risks facing the Company including those that would threaten the business model, future performance, solvency or liquidity. Further details can be found on pages 27 and 28.

The Board also sets the Company’s risk appetite, internal controls and risk management processes. The Board undertakes a review of their effectiveness annually. Further details are set out on pages 26–29.

The activities of the Audit Committee, which assists the Board with its responsibilities in relation to risk and assurance, are set out on pages 54 to 58.

C.3 Audit Committee and auditors

The Audit Committee report on pages 54 to 58 sets out details of how the Committee has discharged its duties during the year, matters reviewed by the Committee and how it ensures the auditor’s objectivity, effectiveness and continued independence. The Audit Committee report also explains the audit tender process that was undertaken during the year.

D.1 The level and components of remuneration

The Remuneration Committee is responsible for recommending to the Board the remuneration policy for Executive Directors and other members of the Executive Committee and for the Chairman, and for implementing this policy. The aim is to align remuneration policy to Company strategy and key business objectives and make sure it reflects our shareholders’, customers’ and regulators’ interests.

The Remuneration Report on pages 68 to 81 outlines the activities of the Committee during the year and sets out excerpts of the Directors’ remuneration policy table as approved by shareholders at the 2014 AGM.

D.2 Procedure

For further information on the work of the Remuneration Committee and Directors’ remuneration packages see the Directors’ Remuneration Report on pages 68 to 81. The Committee’s terms of reference are available on our website.

E.1 Dialogue with shareholders

The Board as a whole is responsible for making sure that satisfactory dialogue with shareholders takes place. We believe that effective channels of communication with the Company’s debt and equity institutional investors and individual shareholders are very important. More information about our approach to relations with shareholders can be found on page 51.

E.2 Constructive use of General Meetings

The AGM provides a key opportunity for the Board to communicate with and meet shareholders. Shareholders are able to learn more about the Company through exhibits and can ask questions directly of the Board. Company representatives and our Registrar are also on hand to answer any questions shareholders might have.

Our AGM will be held on Monday 25 July 2016 at The International Convention Centre in Birmingham and broadcast via our website. The Notice of Meeting for the 2016 AGM, available on our website, sets out in full the resolutions for consideration by shareholders, together with explanatory notes and further information on the Directors standing for election and re-election.

66National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Corporate Governance


LOGO

Corporate Governance
Index to Directors’ Report and other disclosures
(starting on page indicated)
AGM 66
Articles of Association 187
Audit information 84
Board of Directors 47
Business model 14
Change of control provisions 193
Code of Ethics 193
Conflicts of interest 193
Contractual and other arrangements 176
Directors’ indemnity 194
Directors’ share interests 79
Directors’ service contracts and letters of appointment 74
Diversity 44
Dividends 05
Events after the reporting period 188
Financial instruments 126
Future developments 08
Greenhouse gas emissions 21
Human Rights 194
Important events affecting the Company during the year 06
Internal control 26
Internal control over financial reporting 29
Listing Rule 9.8.4 R cross reference table 194
Material interests in shares 189
People 44
Political donations and expenditure 194
Research and development 194
Risk management 26
Share capital 189
National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16
Index to Directors’ Report and other disclosures
67


Directors’ Remuneration Report

Jonathan Dawson

Committee chairman        

LOGO

Annual statement from the

Remuneration Committee chairman

Overview

At the Company’s AGM in 2015 more than 97% of votes cast were to approve the Remuneration Report for that year. As with last year we are not proposing any changes to the formal remuneration policy for National Grid and so this year there is only a vote on the implementation of this policy.

The key elements of our policy are:

●  significant weighting towards long-term incentives versus short-term incentives;
the bulk of senior executive remuneration to be paid in National Grid shares, with all of the Long Term Performance Plan (LTPP) paid only in shares, and half of the Annual Performance Plan (APP) paid in shares;
very high levels of personal shareholding required to be held by senior executives – 500% of pre-tax salary for the CEO and 400% for other Executive Directors;
three-year performance period for measuring potential awards under the LTPP coupled with a holding period of a further two years irrespective of whether the mandatory personal shareholding target has been attained; and

performance metrics for the LTPP are RoE (measuring management’s performance in generating profit from the business) and Value Growth (measuring management’s longer term performance in creating shareholder value).

We believe that our policy ensures that the rewards paid to senior executives are closely matched with shareholders’ experience. In particular, we regard it as very important that senior executives see their annual remuneration in the context of a long-term build-up of their investment in National Grid and that the growth in value of their shareholding and the dividends paid on those shares represent a material personal financial exposure to the success of the Company. As a result we think that the overall remuneration structure illustrates a high level of alignment with shareholders, and promotes an appropriate focus on long-term value within the Company.

Performance for the year

APP

National Grid has had another successful year overall. Record capital investment of £3.9 billion has been undertaken, split equally between the UK and US, and a programme of critical rate case filings has been successfully initiated in the US. As in prior years, the EPS figure used for APP purposes, 62.3 pence, differs slightly from the reported figure of 63.5 pence as it is adjusted for the impact of timing, scrip dividend uptake and exchange rate effects. It has also been reduced to take account of the absence of an increase in the UK corporate tax rate originally included

in the Group budget. The overall impact of these adjustments was a decrease of 1.2 pence. Similarly, the Group RoE figure used for the APP calculation, 12.0%, has been reduced by 0.3 percentage points to take account of the absence of the increase in the UK corporate tax rate referred to above. Notwithstanding this, the EPS of 62.3 pence and Group RoE of 12.0% both met or exceededthe stretch performance levels set by the Committee at the start of the year, benefitting from realised gains achieved from the exchange of National Grid USA’s share in the Iroquois pipeline joint venture and strong results from our Other businesses led by the performance of the French interconnector. In the UK, the regulated businesses delivered good returns of 13.3%. Regulated US RoE was 8.0%, which reflected steady performance though was down on last year due to continued cost pressures as the business awaits outcomes of rate case filings. This figure, however, does not capture the gains achieved from the exchange of National Grid USA’s share in the Iroquois pipeline joint venture referred to above, and therefore has been adjusted by the Committee to reflect half of this gain for US participants in the APP, which the Committee believes properly reflects performance.

As a result, in respect of the financial measures for the APP (representing 70% of the value of the APP) the Committee made awards to Executive Directors ranging from 75% to 100% of the maximum potential for financial performance. The balance of the award (30% by value) is represented by individual executives’ assessed performance against specific objectives set by the Committee at the start of the year, resulting in awards ranging from 80% to 86% of the maximum potential for individual performance. In aggregate, therefore, Executive Directors’ APP awards fall in the range of 95% to 119% of salary. This compares with last year’s APP awards where the range was 65% to 119% of salary.

Because of commercial sensitivity we retrospectively disclose annual targets for the APP, which are set out on page 76. This year, we have sought to enhance our disclosure, including the retrospective disclosure of threshold and stretch performance levels for EPS and Group RoE, which now sits alongside the disclosure of our LTPP threshold and stretch performance levels. Target performance levels for both EPS and Group RoE were higher than for 2014/15; however, the target performance levels for UK RoE and US RoE were reduced, due to the expected returns under the RIIO framework in the UK and the impact of the timing of rate plan filings in the US. We have decided to maintain the same performance metrics for the 2016/17 APP awards and we will repeat our retrospective disclosure of performance levels in next year’s remuneration report.

LTPP

The LTPP that vested in 2015/16 was that awarded in 2012. Vesting outcomes ranged from 63% to 76% of maximum. Before making its final determination of executives’ annual and long-term awards, the Committee gives careful consideration to a number of important non-financial measures including our safety performance, reliability and levels of customer satisfaction in both the UK and the US, and considers whether a downward adjustment should be made to any executive’s award. This year the Committee concluded that there was no reason to make any adjustment. As our Executive Director, US, Dean Seavers, only joined the Board at the beginning of 2015/16, he has not received any vested LTPP for this year, and will not do so until 2017.

The award made in 2015 is the second award in respect of the LTPP granted under the new remuneration policy in 2014. This is a three-year plan with a maximum award of 350% of salary for the CEO and 300% for the other Executive Directors. Its outcome will only be known

68National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Corporate Governance


   Corporate Governance

following the results for the year ending March 2017. I reported last year that, at the end of the first performance year, Group RoE and Value Growth were on target in relation to the parameters set by the Committee, with UK RoE around stretch and US RoE below threshold. For this year the position is broadly comparable in respect of both the 2014 and 2015 LTPP grants. Taking account of performance to date of the 2014 and 2015 LTPP awards, the Committee has decided to make no changes to the performance metrics and targets for the 2016 LTPP award.

Executive Director shareholdings

Two years ago, we introduced high levels of shareholding requirements for our Executive Directors, in order to further align them to our shareholders. At 31 March 2016, both Andrew Bonfield and Steve Holliday have exceeded these shareholding requirements. As John Pettigrew and Dean Seavers were appointed to the Board relatively recently, neither of them has yet met their shareholding requirements and will therefore not be given permission to sell shares until they have done so, other than to pay tax on receipt of the vested shares or in exceptional circumstances.

Changes to the Board

Following the announcement of Steve Holliday’s retirement as CEO, John Pettigrew was promoted to CEO with effect from 1 April 2016. John’s salary has been set at £825,000. His APP opportunity remains at 125% of salary, and his LTPP opportunity has increased to 350% of salary from 2016 onwards. Steve stepped down as CEO on 31 March 2016 but will remain on the Board until 22 July to facilitate a successful transition. In March, we announced that Nicola Shaw will join the Board as our new UK Executive Director on 1 July 2016, succeeding John. Nicola’s salary has been set at £450,000. Her APP opportunity is 125% of salary and her LTPP opportunity is 300% of salary. Nicola will be eligible to receive a 2016 LTPP award. In addition, she will receive a cash payment of up to £485,000 to compensate her for incentive cash awards that were due to vest in June 2016 that she has foregone on leaving her former employer. Subject to their individual performance, the Committee intends to increase each of John’s and Nicola’s salaries towards market level by way of future phased increases from 2017 in excess of those awarded to other Company employees. All of these arrangements are in line with the approved policy on recruitment remuneration and have already been announced.

Annual salary review

Steve Holliday’s and Andrew Bonfield’s annual salaries were increased by approximately 1% in 2015. In line with the US managerial pay budget, Dean Seavers’ annual

salary was not increased in 2015. John Pettigrew’s salary was increased by 7% to move his salary closer towards market as Executive Director, UK in 2015. In line with regional managerial pay budgets in 2016, salary increases in 2016 are 2% for Andrew Bonfield and 2.5% for Dean Seavers.

Impact of the expected sale of a majority interest in the UK Gas Distribution business

Ahead of the expected sale of a majority interest in the Gas Distribution business in 2016/17, the Committee is considering the impact on inflight LTPP and APP awards, and will make appropriate adjustments to relevant metrics within both the parameters and the spirit of the remuneration policy following any such sale. We will report this to you in next year’s remuneration report.

Conclusion

As I reported last year, remuneration continues to be in a transitional phase since the APP maximum has been lowered to 125% of salary from 150% while the LTPP represents previous bases of measurements, timescales and policy limits. This transition will continue for a further year when the final element of the 2013 LTPP vests in 2017 and the 2014 LTPP (the first awarded under the current remuneration policy) matures.

As with last year, we are not seeking any changes to the current remuneration policy, which will expire at the 2017 AGM. The Committee has begun to address whether the current policy should be proposed without any material changes or whether some modification may be required to reflect changes in the market and the evolution of the Company. I will report on the outcome of this review next year when we will seek your authority for a new three-year policy mandate.

Regarding the 2015/16 year, the Committee believes that it has correctly implemented the approved policy and that the remuneration earned last year by senior executives properly reflects the performance of the Company and the value generated for shareholders. Accordingly, I commend this remuneration report to you on behalf of the Committee, and ask for your support for the resolution to approve the report at the AGM.

LOGO

Jonathan Dawson

Committee chairman

 

At a glance

 

 

Performance

A comparison of the total 2015/16 single total figure of remuneration to the maximum remuneration if variable pay had vested in full is set out below.

 

 

 

Total remuneration

      

 

LOGO

 

Executive Director  Maximum
remuneration
£’000
   

2015/16 single figure  
remuneration  

£’000  

  

Andrew Bonfield

   4,077    3,228    

Steve Holliday

   6,478    5,151    

John Pettigrew

   1,815    1,569    

Dean Seavers

   1,883    1,684    
      

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16At a glance69


Corporate Governancecontinued

At a glancecontinued

Key features of policy

Annual report on remuneration

for 2015/16

LOGO     Targeted broadly at mid-market against FTSE 11-40 for UK Executive Directors and general industry and energy services companies with similar revenue for US Executive Directors

Salary increases of 0–7% for 2015

Salary increases of 2–2.5% for 2016

Hired Nicola Shaw as new Executive Director, UK on an annual base salary of £450,000

Appointed John Pettigrew as CEO on an annual base salary of £825,000

LOGO

Maximum opportunity is 125% of salary70% based on financial metrics (35% EPS, 35% RoE), 30% based on individual objectives
50% paid in cash, 50% paid in shares, which must be retained until later of two years and meeting shareholding requirement
Group RoE for CEO and Finance Director; UK RoE for Executive Director, UK; US RoE for Executive Director, US
Subject to both clawback and malus

Individual objectives cover: safety and compliance; Group and financial strategy; business growth; operational excellence; customer experience; employee engagement; capability development; and stakeholder relations

LOGO

Maximum award level is 350% of salary for CEO and 300% for other Executive Directors50% value growth, 50% RoE
Group RoE for CEO and Finance Director; even split of Group and UK RoE for Executive Director, UK; even split of Group and US RoE for Executive Director, US
Vesting subject to long-term performance conditions. Shares must be retained until later of two years from vesting and meeting shareholding requirement
Three-year performance period

Subject to both clawback and malus

LOGO

External appointees participate in Defined Contribution (DC) plan or cash in lieu of pension; internal appointees retain current benefits, subject to capping of pensionable pay increases for Defined Benefit (DB) plansUK DB (Steve Holliday, John Pettigrew): maximum of two-thirds final capped pensionable pay or (Steve Holliday) one thirtieth accrual
UK cash allowance (Andrew Bonfield): 30% of salary
Pensionable pay is salary only in UK and salary and APP in US in alignment with the market
US DC (Dean Seavers): 9% of pensionable pay with additional match of up to 4%
Other benefits as appropriate

Other benefits include private medical insurance, life assurance, and, for UK Executive Directors, either a fully expensed car or a cash alternative to a car and the use of a driver when required

LOGO

500% of salary for CEOSteve Holliday and Andrew Bonfield have both met their shareholding requirements

400% of salary for other

Executive Directors

John Pettigrew and Dean Seavers were appointed to the Board relatively recently, and therefore have not yet met their shareholding requirements

70National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Corporate Governance


   Corporate Governance

Directors’ remuneration policy – approved by shareholders in 2014

Key aspects of the Directors’ remuneration policy, along with elements particularly applicable to the 2015/16 financial year are shown on pages 71–74 for ease of reference only. This policy was approved for three years from the date of the 2014 AGM held on 28 July 2014. A shareholder vote on the remuneration policy is not required in 2016. Please note that the information shown has been updated to take account of the fact that the policy is now approved and current rather than proposed. A copy of the full remuneration policy is available on the Company website atwww.investors.nationalgrid.com/reports/2013-14.

There may be circumstances from time to time when the Committee will consider it appropriate to apply some judgement and exercise discretion in respect of the approved policy. This ability to apply discretion is highlighted where relevant in the policy, and the use of discretion will always be in the spirit of the approved policy.

Our peer group

The Committee benchmarks its remuneration policy against appropriate peer groups annually to make sure we remain competitive in the relevant markets. The primary focus for reward benchmarking is the FTSE 11-40 for UK-based Executive Directors and general industry and energy services companies with similar levels of revenue for US-based Executive Directors. These peer groups are considered appropriate for a large, complex, international and predominantly regulated business.

Approved policy table – Executive Directors

Salary

Purpose and link to strategy: to attract, motivate and retain high-calibre individuals, while not overpaying.

Operation

Maximum levels

Performance metrics, weighting
and time period applicable

Salaries are targeted broadly at mid-market level.

No prescribed maximum annual increase.Not applicable.

They are generally reviewed annually. Salary reviews take into account:

  business and individual contribution;

  the individual’s skills and experience;

  scope of the role, including any changes in responsibility; and

  market data in the relevant comparator group.

Any increases are generally aligned to salary increases received by other Company employees and to market movement. Increases in excess of this may be made at the Committee’s discretion in circumstances such as a significant change in responsibility; progression in the role; and alignment to market level.

BenefitsPurpose and link to strategy: to provide competitive and cost-effective benefits to attract and retain high-calibre individuals.

Operation

Maximum levels

Performance metrics, weighting
and time period applicable

Benefits provided include:

Benefits have no predetermined maximum, as the cost of providing these varies from year to year.

Participation in tax-approved all-employee share plans is subject to limits set by the relevant tax authorities from time to time.

Not applicable.

● 

company car or a cash alternative (UK only);

use of a driver when required;

private medical insurance;

life assurance;

personal accident insurance;

opportunity to purchase additional benefits under flexible benefits schemes available to all employees; and

opportunity to participate in the following HM Revenue & Customs (UK) or Internal Revenue Service (US) tax-advantaged all-employee share plans:

Sharesave: UK employees may make monthly contributions from net salary for a period of three or five years. The savings can be used to purchase shares at a discounted price, set at the launch of each plan period.

Share Incentive Plan (SIP): UK employees may use gross salary to purchase shares. These shares are placed in trust.

Incentive Thrift Plans (401(k) plans): US employees may participate in these tax-advantaged savings plans. They are DC pension plans in which employees can invest their own and Company contributions.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP) (423(b) plan): eligible US employees may purchase ADSs on a monthly basis at a discounted price.

Other benefits may be offered at the discretion of the Committee.

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Directors’ remuneration policy – approved by shareholders in 201471


Corporate Governancecontinued

Directors’ remuneration policy – approved by shareholders in 2014continued

 

 

LOGOPension

Purpose and link to strategy: to reward sustained contribution and assist attraction and retention.

Performance metrics, weighting

OperationMaximum levelsand time period applicable

Pension for a new Executive Director will reflect whether they are internally promoted or externally appointed.

Dear Shareholders,UK DB

Our Board a maximum pension on retirement, at age 60, of two thirds final capped pensionable pay or up to one thirtieth accrual. On death in service, a lump sum of four times pensionable pay and a two thirds dependant’s pension is responsible for shaping the culture, values and ethics of National Grid, both within the boardroom and across the organisation, by setting the tone from the top and establishing high standards of behaviour.provided.

 

The changes introducedUK DC annual contributions of 30% of salary. Life assurance provision of four times pensionable salary and a spouse’s pension equal to one third of the Director’s salary are provided on death in 2014 toservice.

US DB an Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan provides for an unreduced pension benefit at age 62. For retirements at age 62 with 35 years of service, the UK Corporate Governance Code andpension benefit would be approximately two thirds of pensionable pay. Upon death in service, the Financial Reporting Council guidance on risk management have highlightedspouse would receive 50% of the need for the Board to considerpension benefit (100% if the current risk management and internal control practices and cultureparticipant died while an active employee after the age of the Company support the spirit of the changes, not just the letter.55).

 

The updatesUS DC 9% of base salary plus APP with additional 401(k) plan match of up to the New Code have been considered by the Board and refinements approved so we can report on compliance next year as required. It is the intention of the Board that any changes to the frequency and level of reporting received by the Board and Audit Committee in relation to risk management, compliance and internal control as a result of these updates, will also add value to the business.4%.

Not applicable.

If internally promoted:

 

A review

retention of our compliance procedures is also underwayexisting DB benefits without enhancement, except for capping of pensionable pay increases following promotion to make sure that we continue to developBoard; or
retention of existing UK DC benefits or equivalent cash in lieu;
or
retention of existing US DC benefits plus 401(k) plan match, provided through 401(k) plan and improve our compliance with external reporting obligations. In order to further develop our internal assurance programme, we formed the Engineering Assurance Committee to promote the application of common, consistent, engineering assurance methodologies across the Company.non-qualified plans.

If externally appointed:

 

The Board received an in-depth presentation on security and cyber security which provided a framework for discussion around the threats we face and the effectiveness of our strategy to mitigate the inherent risks. We have made a significant investment over the last five years to improve our capabilities

UK DC benefits or equivalent cash in this area so we can adapt to and address an ever-changing threat landscape. Following this session, we agreed that responsibility for making sure we have an effective process for managing cyber security risk should be delegated to the Audit Committee. You can read more about this on page 50. The Board will continue to receive an annual in-depth presentation on information systems and security, including cyber security.

lieu; or
US DC benefits plus 401(k) plan match.

 

This year, in addition to Nick Winser and Maria Richter stepping down at the 2014 AGM, we have said goodbye to Philip Aiken and Tom King and have welcomedAndrew Bonfield, John Pettigrew and Dean Seavers asare treated in line with the above policy.

Steve Holliday is provided with final salary pension benefits. For service prior to 1 April 2013, pensionable pay is normally the base salary in the 12 months prior to leaving the Company. For service from 1 April 2013 increases to pensionable pay are capped at the lower of 3% or the increase in inflation. The pension scheme rules allow for indexed prior salaries to be used for all members. He participates in the unfunded scheme in respect of benefits in excess of the Lifetime Allowance.

In line with market practice, pensionable pay for UK-based Executive Directors includes salary only and for US-based Executive Directors it includes salary and APP award.

Annual Performance Plan

Purpose and link to strategy: to incentivise and reward the achievement of annual financial and strategic business targets and the delivery of annual individual objectives.

Performance metrics, weighting

OperationMaximum levelsand time period applicable

Performance metrics and targets are agreed at the start of each financial year. Performance metrics are aligned with strategic business priorities. Targets are set with reference to the budget. Awards are paid in June.

For APP awards made in 2013/14, 50% of any award was deferred into shares in the Deferred Share Plan (DSP). The DSP has no performance conditions and vests after three years, subject to continued employment. These shares are subject to forfeiture for leavers in certain circumstances.

The DSP was discontinued for APP awards made in respect of years from 2014/15. Instead, 50% of awards are paid in shares, which (after any sales to pay tax) must be retained until the shareholding requirement is met, and in any event for two years after receipt.

Awards are subject to clawback and malus provisions.

The maximum award is 125% of salary.

A significant majority of the APP is based on performance against corporate financial measures, with the remainder based on performance against individual objectives. Individual objectives are role-specific.

The Committee may use its discretion to set measures that it considers appropriate in each financial year and reduce the amount payable, taking account of significant safety or customer service standard incidents, environmental and governance issues.

The payout levels at threshold, target and stretch performance levels are 0%, 50% and 100% respectively.

72National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Corporate Governance


   Corporate Governance

Long Term Performance Plan

Purpose and link to strategy: to drive long-term performance, aligning Executive Director incentives to key strategic objectives and shareholder interests.

OperationMaximum levels

Performance metrics, weighting

and time period applicable

Awards of shares may be granted each year, with vesting subject to long-term performance conditions.

The performance metrics have been chosen as the Committee believes they reflect the creation of long-term value within the business. Targets are set each year with reference to the business plan.

Awards are subject to clawback and malus provisions. Notwithstanding the level of award achieved against the performance conditions, the Committee may use its discretion to reduce the amount vesting, and in particular will take account of compliance with the dividend policy.

For awards granted from 2014, participants must retain vested shares (after any sales to pay tax) until the shareholding requirement is met, and in any event for a further two years after vesting.

The maximum award for the CEO is 350% of salary and it is 300% of salary for the other Executive Directors.

For awards made between 2011 and 2013, the maximum award for the CEO was 225% of salary and 200% for the other Executive Directors.

For awards between 2011 and 2013 the performance measures and weightings were:

●  adjusted EPS (50%) measured over three years;
TSR relative to the FTSE 100 (25%) measured over three years; and
UK or US RoE relative to allowed regulatory returns (25%) measured over four years.

From 2014, the performance measures are:

value growth and Group RoE (for the CEO and Finance Director); and
value growth, Group RoE and UK or US RoE (for the UK and US Executive Directors respectively).

All are measured over a three-year period.

The weightings of these measures may vary year to year, but would always remain such that the value growth metric would never fall below a 25% weighting and never rise above a 75% weighting.

Between 2011 and 2013, 25% of the award vested at threshold and 100% at stretch, with straight-line vesting in between. From 2014, only 20% of the award vests at threshold.

Approved policy table – Non-executive Directors (NEDs)

Fees for NEDs

Purpose and link to strategy: to attract NEDs who have a broad range of experience and skills to oversee the implementation of our strategy.

Operation

Maximum levels

Performance metrics, weighting and
time period applicable

NED fees (excluding those of the Chairman) are set by the Executive Committee in conjunction with the Chairman; the Chairman’s fees are set by the Committee.

Fee structure:

  Chairman fee;

  basic fee, which differs for UK- and US-based NEDs;

  committee membership fee;

  committee chair fee; and

  Senior Independent Director fee.

There are no maximum fee levels.

The benefits provided to the Chairman are not subject to a predetermined maximum cost,

as the cost of providing these

varies from year to year.

Not applicable.

Fees are reviewed every year and are benchmarked against those in companies of similar scale and complexity.

NEDs do not participate in incentive or pension plans and, with the exception of the Chairman, are not eligible to receive benefits. The Chairman is covered by the Company’s private medical and personal accident insurance plans and receives a fully expensed car or cash alternative to a car, with the use of a driver, when required.

There is no provision for termination payments.

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Directors’ remuneration policy – approved by shareholders in 201473


Corporate Governancecontinued

Directors’ remuneration policy – approved by shareholders in 2014continued

Shareholding requirement

The requirement of Executive Directors to build up and hold a relatively high value of National Grid shares ensures they share a significant level of risk with shareholders and their interests are aligned.

From 2014/15, Executive Directors are required to build up and retain shares in the Company. The level of holding required is 500% of salary for the CEO and 400% of salary for the other Executive Directors.

Unless the shareholding requirement is met, Executive Directors will not be permitted to sell shares, other than to pay tax or in exceptional circumstances.

Policy on recruitment remuneration

Salaries for new Executive Directors appointed to the Board will be set in accordance with the terms of the approved remuneration policy in force at the time of appointment, and in particular will take account of the appointee’s skills and experience as well as the scope and market rate for the role.

Where appropriate, salaries may be set below market level initially, with the Committee retaining discretion to award increases in salary in excess of those of the wider workforce and inflation to bring salary to a market level over time, where this is justified by individual and Company performance.

Benefits consistent with those offered to other Executive Directors under the approved remuneration policy in force at the time of appointment will be offered, taking account of local market practice. The Committee may also agree that the Company will meet certain costs associated with the recruitment, for example legal fees, and the Committee may agree to meet certain relocation expenses or provide tax equalisation as appropriate.

Pensions for new Executive Directors appointed to the Board will be set in accordance with the terms of the approved remuneration policy in force at the time of appointment.

Ongoing incentive pay (APP and LTPP) for new Executive Directors will be in accordance with the approved remuneration policy in force at the time of appointment. This means the maximum APP award in any year would be 125% of salary and the maximum LTPP award would be 300% of salary (350% of salary for a new CEO).

For an externally appointed Executive Director, the Company may offer additional cash or share-based payments that it considers necessary to buy out current entitlements from the former employer that will be lost on recruitment to National Grid. Any such arrangements would reflect the delivery mechanisms, time horizons and levels of conditionality of the remuneration lost.

In order to facilitate buy-out arrangements as described above, existing incentive arrangements will be used to the extent possible, although awards may also be granted outside of these shareholder-approved schemes if necessary and as permitted under the Listing Rules.

For an internally appointed Executive Director, any outstanding variable pay element awarded in respect of the prior role will continue on its original terms.

Fees for a new Chairman or Non-executive Director will be set in line with the approved policy in force at the time of appointment.

Policy on payment for loss of office

In line with our policy, all Executive Directors have service contracts which are terminable by either party with 12 months’ notice.

The contracts contain provisions for payment in lieu of notice, at the sole and absolute discretion of the Company. Such payments are limited to payment of salary only for the remainder of the notice period. In the UK such payments would be phased on a monthly basis, over a period no greater than 12 months, and the Executive Director would be expected to mitigate any losses where employment is taken up during the notice period. In the US, for tax purposes the policy is to make any payment in lieu of notice as soon as reasonably practicable, and in any event within two and a half months of the later of 31 December and 31 March immediately following the notice date.

In the event of a UK Director being made redundant, statutory compensation would apply and the relevant pension plan rules may result in the early payment of an unreduced pension.

On termination of employment, no APP award would generally be payable and any DSP awards would generally lapse. However, the Committee has the discretion to deem an individual to be a ‘good leaver’, in which case an APP award would be payable on the termination date, based on performance during the financial year up to termination, and DSP awards would vest on the termination date. Examples of circumstances in which a Director would be treated as a ‘good leaver’ include redundancy, retirement, illness, injury, disability and death. Any APP award would be prorated and would be subject to performance achieved against the objectives for that year.

On termination of employment, outstanding awards under the share plans will be treated in accordance with the relevant plan rules approved by shareholders. Share awards would normally lapse. ‘Good leaver’ provisions apply at the Committee’s discretion and in specified circumstances, including redundancy, retirement, illness, injury, disability and death, where awards will be released to the departing Executive Director or, in the case of death, to their estate. Long-term share plan awards held by ‘good leavers’ may vest subject to performance measured at the normal vesting date and are prorated. Such awards would vest at the same time as for other participants.

The Chairman’s appointment is subject to six months’ notice by either party; for the other Non-executive Directors, notice is one month. No compensation is payable to Non-executive Directors if required to stand down.

74National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Corporate Governance


   Corporate Governance

Annual report on remuneration

Statement of implementation of remuneration policy in 2015/16

Role of Remuneration Committee

The Committee is responsible for recommending to the Board the remuneration policy for Executive Directors and the other members of the Executive Committee and for the Chairman, and for implementing this policy. The aim is to align remuneration policy to Company strategy and key business objectives and ensure it reflects our shareholders’, customers’ and regulators’ interests. The members of the Remuneration Committee in 2015/16 were Nora Mead Brownell, Jonathan Dawson (chair), Paul Golby and Mark Williamson.

The Committee activities during the year

MeetingMain areas of discussion

April

2014/15 individual objectives scoring for Executive Committee

Discussion of 2015/16 objectives for Executive Committee
Review of Executive Committee shareholdings

Review of Committee terms of reference

May

Annual salary review and LTPP proposals for Executive Committee

2014/15 APP financial outturns and individual performance and confirmation of awards
Final approval of 2015/16 objectives for Executive Committee
Final approval of APP targets for 2015/16 financial year
Review of gender and ethnicity pay statistics

October

Approval of remuneration package for incoming CEO and of payments

on retirement for outgoing CEO

November

Update on corporate governance and disclosure issues and review of AGM outcomes

Directors’ Remuneration Report planning for 2016
Review of competitive benchmarking for secondary comparator groups
Review of gender and ethnicity pay statistics disclosure for external website

Update on 2015/16 APP and outstanding LTPPs

March

Approval of remuneration package for incoming Executive Director, UK

Benchmarking data review for Executive Committee remuneration
2016 Directors’ Remuneration Report – review of first draft
Discussion of metrics and targets for APP and LTPP for 2016/17

Review of objectives for Executive Committee for APP 2016/17

Single total figure of remuneration – Executive Directors (audited information)

The following table shows a single total figure in respect of qualifying service for 2015/16, together with comparative figures for 2014/15:
                               
    

Salary

£’000

   

Benefits in kind

£’000

   APP
£’000
   LTPP
£’000
   Pension
£’000
   Other
£’000
   

 

           Total 

           £’000                  

   

 

 

   

 

 

                    
     2015/16   2014/15     2015/16   2014/15     2015/16   2014/15    2015/16   2014/15     2015/16   2014/15     2015/16   2014/15     2015/16   2014/15

 

Andrew Bonfield

   736     727      61     58      865     854      1,345     1,271      221     218           –      3,228    3,128

Steve Holliday

   1,033     1,021      41     40      1,222     1,210      2,125     2,004      730     523           –      5,151    4,798

John Pettigrew

   503     475      14     18      503     527      406     396      143     451           –      1,569    1,867

Dean Seavers

   678     –      39     –      649     –           –      148     –      170     –      1,684    

 

Total

   2,950     2,223      155     116      3,239     2,591      3,876     3,671      1,242     1,192      170     –      11,632    9,793

 

                              

Notes:

Salary: Base salaries were last increased on 1 June 2015. At this time Andrew Bonfield and Steve Holliday received salary increases of approximately 1%, in line with the salary increases given to other managerial employees of the Company in the UK. John Pettigrew was given an increase of 7% to move closer towards market as Executive Director, UK in 2015/16. Dean Seavers joined the Board on 1 April 2015 and was not given a salary increase at 1 June 2015, in line with other managerial employees of the Company in the US. Dean Seavers’ base salary has been converted at $1.4744:£1 for 2015/16.

Benefits in kind: Benefits in kind include private medical insurance, life assurance, and for UK Executive Directors, either a fully expensed car or a cash alternative to a car and the use of a driver when required. For Andrew Bonfield, it also includes the benefits of Sharesave options granted during the year. For Dean Seavers, this amount includes relocation payments.

Other:For Dean Seavers, Other includes the second $250,000 cash payment for forfeited bonuses from his former employer.

LTPP: A portion of the 2012 LTPP award vested in July 2015, and the remainder is due to vest in July 2016. The above value for 2015/16 is based on the share price (818 pence) on the vesting date (1 July 2015) for that portion that vested on 1 July 2015, and the average share price over the three months from 1 January 2016 to 31 March 2016 (958 pence) for that portion due to vest on 1 July 2016. The 2014/15 LTPP amount has been restated to reflect the actual amounts vested on 1 July 2015 for RoE, rather than the estimate shown in last year’s Annual Report. Due to a lower share price at vesting of 818 pence ($64.17 per ADS) versus the estimate of 899 pence ($70.33 per ADS), the actual value at vesting was £29,358, £46,335, and £12,441 lower than the estimate for Andrew Bonfield, Steve Holliday and John Pettigrew respectively.

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Annual report on remuneration75


Corporate Governancecontinued

Annual report on remunerationcontinued

Performance against targets for APP 2015/16 (audited information)

APP awards are earned by reference to the financial year and paid in June. Fifty percent of awards are paid in shares which (after any sales to pay tax) must be retained until the shareholding requirement is met, and in any event for two years after receipt. In relation to both the financial measures and individual objectives, threshold, target and stretch performance levels are pre-determined and pay out at 0%, 50% and 100% respectively and on a straight-line basis in between threshold and target performance and target and stretch performance. Individual objectives of the Executive Directors reflect the primary focus areas within the Company’s overall strategic priorities:

building on our strong safety performance;
the drive for business growth in the UK and US;
delivery of operational excellence and improvement in overall Company performance and service to customers;
promotion of innovative ideas to work more efficiently and effectively;
strengthening the talent pipeline and keeping all our employees fully engaged; and
working with external stakeholders to shape energy policy and embed sustainability into our decision-making to preserve natural resources and focus on environmental issues.

The outcomes of APP awards earned in 2015/16, along with detail of individual objectives, are shown in the figures below:

   Proportion
of max
opportunity
  Threshold  Target  Stretch  Actual  

Proportion
of max

achieved

 

Adjusted EPS (p/share)

  35%    56.2    59.2    62.2    62.3    100%  

 

Group RoE (%)

   11.2    11.6    12.0    12.0    100%  

��

UK RoE (%)

  35%     13.25     13.3    55%  

 

US RoE (%)

    8.25     8.25    50%  

 

Individual objectives

  30%            See adjacent table    80–86%  

Notes:

Overall: Group RoE pertains to the CEO and Finance Director, whilst UK RoE and US RoE pertain to the Executive Director, UK and Executive Director, US, respectively. RoE in some form comprises 35% of the total maximum APP opportunity.

Adjusted EPS: Adjusted EPS actual is reduced by 1.2 pence to account for the impact of timing, absence of a budgeted rise in the UK corporate tax rate, and the impact of scrip dividend uptake and currency adjustments.

Group RoE: Group RoE actual is reduced by 30 basis points to account for the absence of a budgeted rise in the UK corporate tax rate.

US RoE: US RoE actual is adjusted to capture half of the realised gains achieved from the exchange of National Grid USA’s share in the Iroquois pipeline joint venture.

   Andrew  Steve  John  Dean 
    Bonfield  Holliday  Pettigrew  Seavers 

Safety

        ● 

Group strategy

        

Financial strategy

        

Business growth

        ● 

Operational excellence

        ● 

Customer experience

        ● 

Employee engagement

        ● 

Capability development

        ● 

Stakeholder relations

         ● 
Proportion of maximum achieved  80%  82%  86%  80% 

2015/16 APP as proportion of base salary

LOGO

2015/16 LTPP performance (audited information)

The LTPP value included in the 2015/16 single total figure relates to vesting of the conditional LTPP award granted in 2012. The 2012 award is determined based on differing performance periods and vesting dates:

performance over the three years ending 31 March 2015 for the EPS measure (50% weighting), which vested on 1 July 2015;
performance over the three years ending 30 June 2015 for the TSR measure (25% weighting), which vested on 1 July 2015; and
performance over the four years ending 31 March 2016 for the UK RoE measure and 31 December 2015 for the US respectively. In my roleRoE measure (25% weighting overall, split by Executive Director as Chairmanshown overleaf), which will vest on 1 July 2016.

76National Grid Annual Report and leaderAccounts 2015/16Corporate Governance


   Corporate Governance

The performance achieved against the targets, including the expected vesting percentage for the RoE measures, was:

Performance measureThreshold – 25% vestingMaximum – 100% vestingActual/expected vesting

Actual/expected  

proportion of  

maximum achieved  

TSR ranking (25% weighting)

Ranked at median of the Board I am responsiblecomparator group (FTSE 100)

7.5 percentage points or more above median

2.99 percentage points above median

55.0%  

Adjusted EPS (50% weighting)

EPS growth exceeds RPI increase by 3 percentage points

EPS growth exceeds RPI increase by 8 percentage points or more

Exceeded RPI increase by 6.3 percentage points

74.4%  

UK RoE (12.5% weighting for ensuring effectiveness in all aspectsthe CEO and Finance Director; 25% weighting for the Executive Director, UK)

RoE is equal to the average allowed regulatory return

RoE is 2 percentage points or more above the average allowed regulatory return

Exceeded average allowed regulatory return by 3.2 percentage points

100.0%  

US RoE (12.5% weighting for the CEO and Finance Director; 25% weighting for the former Executive Director, US)

RoE is 1 percentage point below the average allowed regulatory return

RoE is 1 percentage point or more above the average allowed regulatory return

1.1 percentage points below the average allowed regulatory return

0%  

The amounts vesting under the 2012 LTPP during the year and included in the 2015/16 single total figure are shown in the table below.

The valuation is based on the following share prices:

818 pence ($64.17 per ADS) on the vesting date of its role. This includes promoting effective relationships1 July 2015 for the EPS and open communication between Directors and encouraging active engagement by all members. This is particularly important as the membershipTSR elements of the Board changesaward; and new relationships are formed. I am pleased
average share price over the three months from 1 January 2016 to report that31 March 2016 of 958 pence ($69.23 per ADS) for the positive outcomeRoE element of the Board and Committee evaluation process reflects this effectiveness. You can read more about this on page 46 and the rigorous selection process prior to Dean’s appointment on page 58.award.

    Original number
of share awards
in 2012 LTPP
   Overall vesting
percentage (including
expected vesting
percentage for RoE
measure)
  

Number of awards
vesting (including
expected

vesting for RoE
measure)

   

Dividend

equivalent

shares

   

Total value of awards
vesting (including
expected vesting for RoE
measure) and  dividend
equivalent shares

(£’000)

 

 

Andrew Bonfield

   213,095     63.45%    135,203     23,787     1,345  

 

Steve Holliday

   336,702     63.45%    213,628     37,586     2,125  

 

John Pettigrew

   52,395     75.95%    39,793     7,136     406  

 

Dean Seavers

                        

Last year’s Directors’ Remuneration Report covering remuneration for 2014/15 included an estimated vesting of the US and UK RoE portions of the 2011 LTPP award. These awards vested on 1 July 2015 and the performance achieved against the performance targets was the same as the expected vesting disclosed in the 2014/15 report. As a result of the actual achievement against the performance targets being the same as estimated, the vesting percentage and number of awards vesting are the same as disclosed in the 2014/15 report. However, the actual number of dividend equivalent shares varied as did the total value of awards vesting due to share price changes between the estimate and the actual date of vesting of the RoE portion. Specifically, the actual price on 1 July 2015 was 818 pence ($64.17 per ADS) rather than the estimate of 899 pence ($70.33 per ADS) disclosed in the 2014/15 report based on the average price from 1 January 2015 to 31 March 2015. As a result, the actual numbers of dividend equivalent shares granted for the 2011 LTPP were 22,454, 35,440 and 7,261 and the actual values of the awards at vesting were £29,358, £46,335 and £12,441 lower than originally estimated for Andrew Bonfield, Steve Holliday and John Pettigrew respectively.

Total pension benefits (audited information)

The table below provides details of the Executive Directors’ pension benefits. Steve Holliday and John Pettigrew participate in a Defined Benefit pension plan, whilst Andrew Bonfield receives cash in lieu of participation in a pension plan, and Dean Seavers participates in a Defined Contribution arrangement. The UK-based Executive Directors in a Defined Benefit pension participate in a salary sacrifice arrangement (FPS), under which the individual’s salary is reduced by an amount equal to the employee pension contribution that would have been paid into the scheme. An equivalent contribution is paid into the scheme by the employer. There are no additional benefits in the event of early retirement.

    Total
contributions
to DC
arrangement
£’000
   Cash in lieu of
pension
contributions
£’000
   Accrued
DB pension
at 31 March 2016
£’000 pa
   Increase
in accrued
DB pension
over year
£’000 pa
   

Reduction
in salary
due to FPS

£’000

   

Increase/
(decrease) in
any lump sum

£’000

   

Value of

pension benefit
calculated using
BIS methodology

£’000

   

Normal
retirement

date

 

 

Andrew Bonfield

        221                         221     17/08/2027  

 

Steve Holliday

             591     39     62     2     730     26/10/2016  

 

John Pettigrew

             151     7     29     23     143     26/10/2031  

 

Dean Seavers

   148                              148     30/08/2025  

Notes:

Steve Holliday: In addition to the accrued DB pension at 31 March 2016 above, there is an accrued lump sum entitlement of £129,000 as at 31 March 2016. The increase to the accumulated lump sum, net of inflation, was £2,000 in the year to 31 March 2016. The increase in accrued DB pension over the year shown above is net of inflation, as UK pensions in payment or deferment increase in line with inflation.

John Pettigrew: In addition to the accrued DB pension at 31 March 2016 above, there is an accrued lump sum entitlement of £452,000 as at 31 March 2016. The increase to the accumulated lump sum, net of inflation, was £23,000 in the year to 31 March 2016. The increase in accrued DB pension over the year shown above is net of inflation, as UK pensions in payment or deferment increase in line with inflation.

Dean Seavers: The average exchange rate for 2015/16 was $1.4744:£1. Through his participation in the 401(k) plan in the US (a DC arrangement) the Company made contributions worth £27,400. The Company also made contributions worth £121,049 to the Non-Qualified Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan which pays the portion of core contributions that cannot be paid under the qualified plan due to IRS limitations. The plan also provides a supplemental top-up benefit through additional company contributions to yield an overall company contribution of 9% of pensionable pay, including both the qualified and non-qualified plan benefits. The retirement date shown is the typical retirement age in the US. The 401(k) plan does not have a retirement age. Benefits can be taken without penalty on leaving the Company from age 55 (subject to vesting requirements) or can be rolled over into another qualifying plan.

BIS calculation: In accordance with BIS methodology, the pension benefit for Andrew Bonfield and Dean Seavers is calculated as the aggregate of contributions made to a DC arrangement and cash in lieu of pension contributions. Also in accordance with BIS methodology, the pension benefit for Steve Holliday and John Pettigrew is calculated as the increase in accrued DB pension over the year shown above multiplied by 20 plus the increase in the lump sum shown above, less the reduction in salary due to FPS. Each element is calculated separately and rounded to produce the numbers in the table above.

 

Clear
National Grid Annual Report and concise communications with our shareholders remain a focusAccounts 2015/16Annual report on remuneration77


Corporate Governancecontinued

Annual report on remunerationcontinued

Single total figure of remuneration – Non-executive Directors (audited information)

The following table shows a single total figure in respect of qualifying service for 2015/16, together with comparative figures for 2014/15:

   

Fees

£’000

  

Other emoluments

£’000

  

Total

£’000

 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
                   2015/16         2014/15                   2015/16       2014/15                   2015/16         2014/15   

 

 

  Nora Mead Brownell

   94       91            –     94       91    

  Jonathan Dawson

   99       96            –     99       96    

  Therese Esperdy

   128       91            –     128       91    

  Sir Peter Gershon

   494       488     15       16     509       504    

  Paul Golby

   103       81            –     103       81    

  Ruth Kelly

   82       79            –     82       79    

  Mark Williamson

   121       118            –     121       118    

 

 

  Total

   1,121       1,044     15       16     1,136       1,060    

 

 

Therese Esperdy: Fees for 2015/16 include £22,917 in fees for serving on the National Grid USA Board.

Sir Peter Gershon: Other emoluments comprise private medical insurance, cash in lieu of a car and the use of a driver when required.

In accordance with the Company’s expenses policies, Non-executive Directors receive reimbursement for their reasonable expenses for attending Board meetings. In instances where those costs are treated by HMRC as taxable benefits, the Company also meets the associated tax cost to the Non-executive Directors through a PAYE settlement agreement with HMRC.

The total emoluments paid to Executive and Non-executive Directors in the year was £13 million (2014/15: £15 million).

LTPP (conditional award) granted during the financial year (audited information)

The face value of the awards is calculated using the volume-average weighted share price at the date of grant (25 June 2015) (£8.5147 per share and $66.9618 per ADS).

LTPP  Basis of award     Face value ’000     Proportion vesting at
threshold performance
     Number of shares     Performance  
period end date  
 

 

 

Andrew Bonfield

   300% of salary       £2,211       20%       259,668       June 2018    

Steve Holliday

   350% of salary       £3,622       20%       425,440       June 2018    

John Pettigrew

   300% of salary       £1,525       20%       179,072       June 2018    

Dean Seavers

   300% of salary       $3,000       20%       44,801 (ADSs)       June 2018    

 

 

Performance conditions for LTPP awards granted during the financial year (audited information)

   Weighting   Conditional share awards granted – 2015 
Performance measure          Andrew Bonfield       Steve Holliday     John Pettigrew     Dean Seavers    Threshold – 20% vesting   Maximum – 100% vesting   

 

 

Group RoE

   50%     50%     25%     25%      11.0%     12.5% or more    

UK RoE

       25%       
 
 
1 percentage point
above the average
allowed regulatory return
  
  
  
   
 
 
3.5 percentage points or  
more above the average  
allowed regulatory return  
  
  
  

 

US RoE

        

 

 

 

25% 

 

  

  

 

 
 

 

90% of the average
allowed regulatory return

 

  
  

  

 

 
 
 

 

105% or more of the  
average allowed  
regulatory return  

 

  
  
  

 

Value growth

  

 

 

 

50%

 

  

  

 

 

 

50%

 

  

  

 

 

 

50%

 

  

  

 

 

 

50% 

 

  

  

 

 

 

10.0%

 

  

  

 

 

 

12.0% or more  

 

  

 

 

Payments for loss of office (audited information)

There were no payments made for loss of office during 2015/16.

Payments to past Directors (audited information)

Nick Winser stepped down from the Board at the 2014 AGM and left the Company on 31 July 2015. Tom King stepped down from the Board and left the Company on 31 March 2015. Mr Winser and Mr King held awards over shares and ADSs, respectively, which were pro-rated according to their departure date. The vesting of all these awards will occur at the normal vesting dates subject to satisfaction of their specified performance conditions at that time. Portions of these awards vested on 1 July 2015 and pertain to the RoE portion of the 2011 LTPP and the TSR and EPS portions of the 2012 LTPP.

   Pro-rated number of
share awards in 2011
(RoE portion) and 2012 LTPP
   Overall vesting percentage   Number of awards vesting   Dividend equivalent
shares
   Total value of awards  
vesting and dividend  
equivalent shares  
(£’000)  
 

 

 

Tom King

   44,846 (ADSs)     56.12%     25,168 (ADSs)     4,063 (ADSs)     1,202    

 

Nick Winser

  

 

 

 

166,305

 

  

  

 

 

 

76.37%

 

  

  

 

 

 

127,000

 

  

  

 

 

 

24,035

 

  

  

 

 

 

1,235  

 

  

 

 

Shareholder dilution

Where shares may be issued or treasury shares reissued to satisfy incentives, the aggregate dilution resulting from executive share-based incentives will not exceed 5% in any 10-year period. Dilution resulting from all incentives, including all-employee incentives, will not exceed 10% in any 10-year period. The Committee reviews dilution against these limits regularly and under these limits the Company, as at 31 March 2016, had headroom of 4.01% and 7.98% respectively.

78National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Corporate Governance


   Corporate Governance

Statement of Directors’ shareholdings and share interests (audited information)

The Executive Directors are required to build up and hold a shareholding from vested share plan awards. Deferred share plan awards are not taken into account for these purposes until the end of the deferral period. Shares are valued for these purposes at the 31 March 2016 price, which was 987 pence per share ($71.42 per ADS).

The following table shows how each Executive Director complies with the shareholding requirement and also the number of shares owned by the Non-executive Directors, including connected persons, as Non-executive Directors do not have a shareholding requirement.

The shareholding is as at 31 March 2016 and the salary used to calculate the value of shareholding is the gross annual salary as at 31 March 2016:

The normal vesting dates for the Boardconditional share awards subject to performance conditions are 1 July 2016; 1 July 2016 and we hope that1 July 2017; 1 July 2017; and 1 July 2018 for the overviewLTPP 2012, LTPP 2013, LTPP 2014 and LTPP 2015 respectively.
The normal vesting dates for the conditional share awards subject to continuous employment are 13 June 2016 and 17 June 2017 for the DSP 2013 and DSP 2014 respectively.
In each of our business modelApril and May 2016 a further 15 shares were purchased on page 12 helpsbehalf of Andrew Bonfield, Steve Holliday and John Pettigrew via the Share Incentive Plan (an HMRC approved all-employee share plan), thereby increasing their beneficial interests. There have been no other changes in Directors’ shareholdings between 1 April 2016 and 18 May 2016.
Both Andrew Bonfield and Steve Holliday have met their shareholding requirement of 400% and 500% of base salary, respectively. As both John Pettigrew and Dean Seavers were relatively new in post, they have not yet met their requirements and will not be allowed to articulate how we create value for you, our shareholders, as well as oursell shares other stakeholders.

than to pay tax on receipt of vested shares or in exceptional circumstances until this requirement is met.

 

LOGO

Directors Share ownership
requirements
(multiple of salary)
     Number of shares
owned outright
(including connected
persons)
     Number of shares
held as a multiple
of current salary
     Number of options
granted under the
Sharesave Plan
     Conditional share
awards subject to
performance
conditions (LTPP 2012,
2013, 2014 and 2015)
     Conditional share  
awards subject to  
continuous  
employment (DSP 2013  
and 2014)  
 

 

 

 

Executive Directors

                     

 

Andrew Bonfield

  400%       317,711       426%       6,651       756,209       92,754    

 

Steve Holliday

  500%       1,306,289       1,246%       3,542       1,224,546       126,771    

 

John Pettigrew

  400%       198,749       386%       4,286       417,251       28,691    

 

Dean Seavers (ADSs)

  400%       1,225       9%              85,767       –    

 

Non-executive Directors

                     

 

Nora Mead Brownell (ADSs)

         5,000       n/a                     –    

 

Jonathan Dawson

         36,586       n/a                     –    

 

Therese Esperdy (ADSs)

         1,600       n/a                     –    

 

Sir Peter GershonDisclosure Committee

ChairmanThe role of the Disclosure Committee is to assist the Chief Executive and the Finance Director in fulfilling their responsibility for overseeing the accuracy and timeliness of the disclosures made – whether in connection with our presentations to analysts, financial reporting obligations, or other material stock exchange announcements, including the disclosure of price sensitive information.

This year the Committee met to consider the announcements of the full- and half-year results and reported on relevant matters to the Audit Committee. In doing so it spent time considering the Company’s disclosure obligations relating to the announcement of the proposed UK Gas Distribution sale process and the expected impact this would have on the Company’s growth rate.

The Committee also reports the results of its evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls to the Audit Committee.

The Committee is chaired by the Finance Director and its members are the Group General Counsel & Company Secretary, the Global Tax and Treasury Director, the Global Financial Controller, the Director of Investor Relations, the Head of Corporate Audit and the Deputy Group General Counsel, with other attendees as appropriate.

The Committee in action – rate case filings

During the year, the Committee reviewed and discussed our proposed rate case filings for both Massachusetts electricity operations (MECO) and our downstate New York gas companies (KEDNY/KEDLI). These filings aim to increase our allowed revenue in line with increased operating costs since base rates were reset after the last full rate review for each company (2010 for MECO, 2008 for KEDNY/KEDLI) and also to fund future investment needed to meet our customers’ requirements and improve reliability.

A key focus of the Committee discussions was on understanding the impact of the requested rate increases on our customers, and considering stakeholder perspectives. Following discussion, the proposals were approved for filing at the October meeting for MECO and at the January meeting for KEDNY/KEDLI.

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Management committees63


Corporate Governancecontinued

Statement of compliance with the UK

Corporate Governance Code

 

    42


  

Our Board

LOGO

LOGO

    NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/1543                        


The UK Listing Rules require that listed companies must include in their annual report a statement of whether the Company has complied with all the relevant provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code. The UK Corporate Governance Code was published in September 2014 (the Code), available in full atwww.frc.org.uk.

 

Corporate Governancecontinued

Governance framework

Compliance statement

TheFor the year ended 31 March 2016, the Board considers that it has complied in full with the provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code 2012 (the Code) during the financial year being reported, see page 53 for our explanation in relation to external audit tendering.

This reportCode. Our statement of compliance opposite explains the main featuresaspects of the Company’s governance structure to give a greater understanding of how the mainCompany has applied the principles ofand complied with the Code have been applied.provisions in the Code. The main report also includes items required byexplains compliance with the Disclosure Rules and Transparency Rules. The index on page 5967 sets out where to find each of the disclosures required in the Directors’ Report and in respect of Listing Rule 9.8.4, together with the Board’s sign-off on the report.

UK Corporate Governance Code 2014

The new UK Corporate Governance Code 2014 (the New Code) applies to the Company for the next financial year, 2015/16. In March, the Board considered the current governance arrangements and approved refinements to support compliance with the New Code. Details will be provided in the 2015/16 Annual Report and Accounts.A. Leadership

 

Fair, balanced and understandable

A.1The requirement for Directors to state that they consider the Annual Report and Accounts, taken as a whole, is fair, balanced and understandable remains a key consideration in the drafting and review process. The coordination and reviewrole of the Annual Report follows a well-established and documented process, which is conducted in parallel with the formal audit process undertaken by the external auditors and the review by the Board and its committees (of relevant sections).

This process gives the Board comfort that all material statements are accurate and that the Annual Report gives sufficient prominence to negative as well as positive information. The drafting and assurance process supports the Audit Committee and Board’s assessment of the overall fairness, balance and clarity of the Annual Report and the Directors’ statement on page 78.

Our Board

Our current Board membership is set out on the previous page, with biographical details of Directors on pages 178 to 179. The Directors in place during the year are set out on page 49, together with details of Board meeting attendance. Committee membership during the year and attendance at meetings is set out in each of the individual committee reports later in this report. For further details about the Directors’ service contracts and letters of appointment, see page 67 of the Directors’ Remuneration Report.

Role of our Board

Our Board is collectively responsible for the effective oversight of the Company and its businesses. It also determines the strategic direction, business plan, objectives, principal risks, viability of the Company and governance structure that will help achieve the long-term success of the Company and deliver sustainable shareholder value.

 

The Board sets the risk appetite and principal risks for the Company and takes the lead in areas such as safeguarding the reputation of the Company and its financial policy, as well as making sure we maintain a sound system of internal control and risk management (see pages 3826 to 41)29).

 

The Board’s full responsibilities are set out in theThere is a clear schedule of matters reserved for the Board and a schedule of delegation, which were both updated in January 2015. These are2016. The schedule of matters reserved for the Board is available on our website, together with other governance documentation.

 

A.2 A clear division of responsibilities

The Board supports the separation of the roles of the Chairman and Chief Executive. The key responsibilities are clearly documented and reviewed when appropriate. The Chairman manages and leads the Board. The Chief Executive is responsible for the executive leadership and day-to-day management of the Company and the Group’s businesses, to ensure the delivery of the strategy agreed by the Board.

 

OurA.3 Role of the Chairman

The Chairman, who was independent on appointment, is responsible for the leadership and management of the Board and its governance. He ensuresmakes sure the Board is effective in its role by promoting a culture of openness and debate, facilitating the effective contribution of all Directors and helping to maintain constructive relations between Executive and Non-executive Directors. The Chairman sets the Board’s agenda making sure consideration is given to the main challenges and opportunities facing the Company, and adequate time is available to discuss all items, including strategic issues.

 

Our Chief Executive is responsible for the executive leadership and day-to-day managementA.4 Role of the Company, to ensure the delivery of the strategy agreed by the Board. Through his leadership of the Executive Committee, he demonstrates commitment to safety, operational and financial performance.Non-executive Directors

Our Senior Independent Director acts as a sounding board for the Chairman and serves as an intermediary for the other Directors, as well as shareholders when required.

 

Independent of management,our Non-executive Directors bring diverse skills and experience, vital to constructive challenge and debate. Exclusively, they form the Audit, Nominations and Remuneration Committees, and have an important role intheir views are actively sought when developing proposals on strategy.

 

Around the Board meetings, the Chairman holds meetings with the Non-executive Directors without the Executive Directors present.

  

Examples of Board focus during the year:

Board strategy session. In addition to time allocated during the year at Board meetings, in January the Board took part in a half-day interactive strategy session, involving a combination of full Board discussions and breakout groups. The Board considered questions raised by the business plan and recent strategic analysis, future opportunities for the Company including business development, mergers and acquisitions and how our core capabilities could be exploited.

The Board found the additional session extremely useful and suggested that further regular updates and discussions would help consolidate its thinking, in particular in relation to the development of a longer-term perspective on potential growth in other geographical areas.

European energy policy. The Board received updates on how changes in the EU will affect and influence the UK energy policy, including Electricity Market Reform, support for interconnectors and Carbon Capture and Storage.

The 2014 UK Winter Outlook. This annual publication confirmed that the Company was in a strong position in respect of gas in the UK, with no heightened concerns, but for electricity, margins were expected to be tight. Updates to the Board confirmed that the UK business had a good understanding of the issues and risks. A robust mitigation strategy, agreed with the UK Government, was approved and implemented.

Interconnector projects. In January, the Board received a presentation on Great Britain’s interconnector market and our pipeline of opportunities, including an overview of our two most advanced projects; potential new links to Belgium and Norway. Following feedback provided, the Board approved the final investment decision in relation to the Belgium interconnector in February 2015 and the interconnector with Norway in March 2015.

Emerging risks. The Board received a risk update paper including an overview of the framework that has been developed to track emerging risks and the resulting opportunities and/or threats. Additionally, the Board received an update on three themes that had emerged from the 2014 risk workshop to make sure that we were sufficiently prepared for ‘black swan’ events (catastrophic events of extremely high impact and extremely low likelihood).

 

      4464National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16

Corporate Governance

 


 

   Corporate Governance

 

 

 

Updates will continue to be provided to the Board on a regular basis, as appropriate.

Risk workshop. The Board participated in a risk workshop that included an update on the changes introduced by the New Code, the annual risk appetite review and an in-depth review of the current risk profile of the Company. At the workshop, it was agreed that the evaluation of risk appetite should permeate through to the evaluation of all new projects and further work was required in relation to the risk appetite definitions and the Company’s risk profile.

Safety updates. Safety is discussed at every Board meeting. The Board receives safety updates in the Chief Executive’s report and supplementary to this, the Safety, Environment and Health (SEH) Committee chairman provides an oral summary of matters considered at Committee meetings.

Annual talent management review. The Board noted the progress of the development of capacity, capability and the talent pipeline and the accelerated development programme, which had resulted in long-term career plans being put in place and graduates moving through the Company more speedily than in the past.

Examples of expected Board focus for next year:

 regular reviews of safety activities;

 mid-term review of our progress and performance under

    RIIO;

 continued detailed review of strategy and financing;

 key US rate case filings;

 regulatory compliance;

 implications of the Integrated Transmission Planning and

    Regulation project on our activities;

 review of the political situation following the UK general

    election and the impact on energy policy in the UK and EU;

 refined reporting to strengthen our assessment and

    monitoring of internal control and risk management

    following the updates to the New Code;

 reviews into UK and US regulation and the major projects

    in the UK;

 the 2015 UK Winter Outlook; and

 results of the 2015 employee opinion survey.

Board compositionB. Effectiveness

The successful delivery of our strategy depends upon attracting and retaining the right talent. This starts with having a high-quality Board. Balance is an important requirement for the composition of the Board, not only in terms of the number of Executive and Non-executive Directors, but also in terms of expertise and backgrounds.

While traditional diversity criteria such as gender and ethnicity are important, we also value diversity of skills, experience, knowledge and thinking styles. You can read about our Board diversity policy in the Nominations Committee report on page 58.

Following the conclusion of the 2014 AGM we said goodbye to Maria Richter and Nick Winser from the Board. Additionally, Philip Aiken stepped down with effect from 25 February 2015 and Tom King from 31 March 2015. We welcomed John Pettigrew as Executive Director, UK on 1 April 2014 and Dean Seavers as Executive Director, US with effect from 1 April 2015.

Director induction and development

As our internal and external business environment changes, it is important to make sure that Directors’ skills and knowledge are refreshed and updated regularly. Our Chairman is responsible for the ongoing development of all Directors.

    

To strengthen the Directors’ knowledge and understanding of the Company, Board meetings regularly include updates and briefings on specific aspects of the Company’s activities. In January the Board participated in a strategy session; see the previous page.

Updates on corporate governance and regulatory matters are also provided at Board meetings, with details of development and training opportunities for Directors available in our online document library.

Additionally, the Non-executive Directors are expected to visit at least one operational site annually. In 2014 this included visits in the UK to the LNG terminal on the Isle of Grain, the gas distribution control centre, and the customer centre and emergency dispatch based in Hinckley. And in the US, the Directors met with management of the Independent System Operator New England and visited the Brooklyn Queens Interconnect project, a Long Island power station, and other major projects and stakeholders in New York City. Visits to the Long Island power plants and the Western Link project are among those planned for 2015. These visits provide the opportunity for Directors to meet local management teams and discuss aspects of the business with employees.

With the agreement of the Board, Executive Directors gain experience of other companies’ operations, governance frameworks and boardroom dynamics through non-executive appointments. The fees for these positions are retained by the individual. See page 67 for more details.

  

B.1 The composition of the Board

The Board in action

Thinking styles session

Following on frombelieves it operates effectively with an appropriate balance of independent Non-executive and Executive Directors who have the thinking styles session supported by an external consultant held in 2014, the Board undertook a second session in February 2015.

The session was specifically designed to encourage diverse thinking within the boardroom. New Board members were invited to give their thoughts on how the Company operates. The session covered the benefitsright balance of thinking styles for different types of discussionskills, experience, independence and ways in which the diverse capability that exists within the Board could be harnessed to maximise its effectiveness. The session also reviewed the progress made since the 2014 session.

A thinking styles action has been included in the action plan resulting from this year’s Board evaluation; see page 47.

Directors’ induction programme

Following Dean’s appointment to the Board, the Chairman, Chief Executive and Group General Counsel & Company Secretary arranged a comprehensive induction programme. The programme has been tailored based on his experience and background and the requirements of his role.

Dean’s induction programme has included a meeting with our external legal advisors to discuss the duties and requirements of being a listed company director in the UK. He has also held one-to-one meetings with his fellow Directors and senior management, and attended visits to operational sites to build his understandingknowledge of the Company and its businesses in the UK and US. His induction will continue over the coming months and will include further operational site visits.Company.

 

Details of Thereseour Board, their individual biographies and John’s induction programmes were provided in last year’s Annual ReportCommittee membership are set out on pages 47 and Accounts. These programmes have continued over the year.

LOGO

      NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/1545                        


Corporate Governance

Corporate Governancecontinued

48. Board and committee evaluation

As shown in the diagram below, we are in the third year of our evaluation cycle. This year an internal Board performance evaluation was conducted. The evaluation was ‘upward facing’ with questionnaires completed by non-Board members on the Executive Committee and regular attendees and presenters at Board meetings.

LOGO

The questions asked covered the following areas:

 time and focus for agenda items;

 the direction/guidance received to support the preparation

    of papers and presentations;

 coverage by presenters on key topics;

 values and behaviours displayed by the Board and the

    experience of attending Board meetings;

 level of challenge and questioning by the Directors; and

 diversity of thinking styles present on the Board.

The responses were collated into a confidential and non-attributable report which was presented to the Board in February. At this meeting, the Board considered the report and discussed its performance generally over the past year. The Board confirmed that it had worked well together as a unit, discharged its duties and responsibilities effectively over the year; and worked effectively with the Board committees.

Following this meeting, a draft action plan was prepared and considered by the Board in March. At this meeting, the Board agreed a number of actions for the forthcoming year, as set out below. Progress against these actions will be monitored throughoutattendance during the year by the Board.

Environment

Optimise the boardroom layout to create a more inclusive environment for members and presenters.

Responsibility: Board members/Group General Counsel & Company Secretary

Continue to create a more open boardroom atmosphere and culture.

Responsibility: Chairman/Board members

Board discussions

Maximise the effectiveness of Board discussions.

Responsibility: Chairman/Executive Directors/Group General Counsel & Company Secretary

Use a diversity of thinking styles.

Responsibility: Chairman/Board members

Board focus

Continue to manage the strategy agenda.

Responsibility: Chairman/Chief Executive/Group General Counsel & Company Secretary

Progress against last year’s actions has been monitored through the year and a commentary against each action31 March 2016 is set out opposite.

Committee evaluation

An evaluation of committee performance was also conducted by the chairman of each of the Board committees, as well as the Executive Committee. The process broadly followed that conducted by the Board with questionnaires being completed by regular attendees and presenters at the respective committee meetings. The process followed by the Nominations Committee was slightly different; see ‘The Committee in action’ box on page 57 for more details.52.

 

Following consideration of the results of the evaluation, each committee concluded that it had operated effectively throughout the year and agreed an action plan to further improve performance. Copies of each committee’s action plan were provided to the Board and it confirmed that it agreed that each committee had operated effectively.

Progress against the action plans will be monitored through the year by the respective committee and the Board.

Non-executive Director independence

The independence of the Non-executive Directors is considered at least annually along with their character, judgement, commitment and performance on the Board and relevant committees. The Board took into consideration the Code and indicators of potential non-independence, including length of service.

 

The Board considered Paul Golby’s independence separately following the announcement of his appointment as Chairman of Costain Group plc (a major supplier to the Company). The situational conflict was authorised (including putting in place protective measures to ensure the conflict is appropriately managed) and his independence was confirmed.

At year end, all of the Non-executive Directors, with the exception of the Chairman, who’s independence is only determined on appointment, have been determined by the Board to be independent.

 

B.2 Appointments to the Board

The Nominations Committee, which comprises the Chairman and Non-executive Directors leads the process for Board appointments and makes recommendations to the Board. The process for the appointment of John Pettigrew as Chief Executive and Nicola Shaw as Executive Director, performance

At a private meetingUK were formal, rigorous and transparent. Further details of each appointment process, succession planning and the role of the Nominations Committee can be found on page 61.

B.3 Time commitment

Non-executive Directors Mark Williamson, as Senior Independent Director, led a revieware advised of Sir Peter’s performance. Thethe time commitment expected from them on appointment. External commitments, which may impact existing time commitments, must be agreed with the Chairman. Details of external appointments are set out in the biographies on pages 47 and 48.

As part of the evaluation of the Chairman, the Non-executive Directors, with input from the Executive Directors, assessed his ability to fulfilfulfill his role as Chairman, and the arrangements he has in place, given he is also chairman of a FTSE 250 company and the Aircraft Carrier Alliance. They concluded that Sir Peter’s performance continued to be effective.

Sir Peter met each Director individually to discuss their contribution, performance over the year and training and development needs. Following these meetings, Sir Peter confirmed to the Nominations Committee that he considered that each Director demonstrated commitment to the role and their performance continued to be effective.

Following recommendations from the Nominations Committee the Board considers all Directors continue to be effective, committed to their roles and have sufficient time available to perform their duties. Therefore, in accordance with the Code, all Directors will seek election or re-election at the 2015 AGM as set out in the Notice of Meeting.

      46


AreaActions from last year’s reviewCommentary

Decision makingtaking into account other significant appointments.

  

With the agreement of the Board, Executive Directors gain experience of other companies’ operations, governance frameworks and boardroom dynamics through non-executive appointments. The fees for these positions are retained by the individual.

For further details about the Directors’ service contracts and letters of appointment, see page 74 of the Directors’ Remuneration Report.

B.4 Development

All important matters requiring approvalnew Directors are provided with a full induction programme when they are appointed to the Board. Details of Director induction and development can be broughtfound on page 51.

B.5 Information and support

The Group General Counsel & Company Secretary makes sure that appropriate and timely information is provided to the Board and its Committees and is responsible for early input before a decision is needed.

Responsibility:advising and supporting the Chairman and Chief Executive

Sir Peter Gershon and Steve Hollidaythe Board on all governance matters. All Directors have regularly reviewed the forward business schedule withaccess to the Group General Counsel & Company Secretary over the year. The schedule is also included with the papers for each Board meeting to ensure Directors are aware of forthcoming topics for discussion. Following the thinking styles session in February 2015, the schedule was also reviewed to consider if any items could be brought forward early to allow Directors to contribute to thinking and direction at a preliminary stage of the debate.

Board discussions

Greater clarity about the scope of Board discussions to be provided in advance and Board members to be encouraged to question if not clear.

Responsibility: Chairman

The Company Secretariat team engaged with external specialists in effective reporting to support the development of the information that goes to the Board. The new reporting framework has resulted in clearer, more concise papers, which has supported improved Board discussion and decision making. Following the successful implementation of the new reporting framework at Board level it has also been rolled out to the Board committees and the Executive Committee.

Degree of challenge

The Executive Directors to speak to the Chairman about what would make them feel more comfortable to challenge and debate, both with the Non-executive Directors and with their fellow Executive Directors at Board meetings.

Responsibility: Executive Directors

In February, the Board reviewed progress against the 2013/14 action plan and noted that all Executive Directors felt empowered to input freely at Board meetings and that there was open and honest dialogue. The Chairman will continue to monitor this on an ongoing basis.

Board focus

A number of topics were identified that Directors felt needed additional focus by the Board at its meetings, for example cyber risk and the UK political landscape. Ways to improve the focus on each of these topics were discussedmay take independent professional advice at the March 2014 Board meeting and specific actions were agreed and allocated.

Responsibility: various Board members

The Board has taken into account the need for additional focusCompany’s expense in certain areas and this has been reflected in the meeting agendas.

Strategy: several papers focusing on strategy and growth have been received by the Board over the year in addition to the Board strategy session. Topics included: review of the UK gas market; US and other market opportunities; exploitation of core capabilities; expansion in and outside our core geographies; and a general update on the interconnectors.

Political risk: political updates are provided in the Chief Executive’s report to the Board as appropriate. Additional papers on the politics of UK and US energy and a general update on politics in Europe have been presented to the Board and updates will continue to be provided as appropriate.

Cyber risk: an update on cyber risk and security went to the Board and Audit Committee in September. At this meeting, the Board decided that responsibility for making sure there is an effective process for managing cyber security risk should be undertaken by the Audit Committee. The Board is scheduled to receive an in-depth presentation in November 2015.

Relationship with UK and US regulators: updates on the meetings that take place between our Chairman and the Chairman of Ofgem are provided to the Board. Updates on US regulation and the meetings that take place with the US regulators are also provided to the Board in the Chief Executive’s report.

Effectiveness of the Board

Actions to improve Board effectiveness were proposed, for example: continue to improve the quality of Board papers; make sure in-depth items for Board consideration highlight the important issues to be discussed; and encourage reporting from management that incorporates more input from the Executive Directors.

Responsibility: Chairman, Chief Executive and Group General Counsel & Company Secretary as appropriate

The new reporting framework described above will also help improve the effectiveness of the Board. As part of the new framework, executive owners of papers on the Board agenda have a greater input in to and ownership for the preparation of papers. Management are encouraged to meet with the executive owner at the start of the drafting process to discuss the framework for the paper and owners are required to review and sign off on the final paper prior to submission to the Board or committee.

LOGO

        NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/1547                        


Corporate Governance

Corporate Governancecontinued

Investor engagement

We believe it is important to maintain effective channels of communication with our debt and equity institutional investors and individual shareholders. This helps us to understandconducting their views about the Company and allows us to make sure they are provided with timely and appropriate information on our strategy, performance, objectives, financing and other developments.

Institutional investors

We carry out a comprehensive engagement programme for institutional investors and research analysts. This includes meetings, presentations, webinars, attendance at investor conferences across the UK and US, and holding road shows in major investor centres across Europe, the US and Asia Pacific.

The programme provides the opportunity for our current and potential investors to meet with executive and operational management.

In the past year, our engagement programme has focused on clarifying our Group growth expectations and explaining to investors how we expect the Company to continue to perform under the RIIO price controls in the UK. These areas of focus have been reflected in our regular results presentations as well as in more detail during an investor seminar at our Castle Donington site.

In addition to these engagement activities, we also held a stewardship meeting in July last year. The event provided major investors with an understanding of our performance and an insight into the operation of our Board with a particular focus on the work of our Remuneration and Audit Committees. The event also provided the opportunity for attendees to ask questions and meet members of the Board and for our Non-executive Directors to further develop their understanding of our shareholders’ views and concerns. A copy of the presentation given on the day is available in the Investors section of our website.

Sir Peter also contacted our major shareholders in April 2015 to offer them the opportunity to meet him or the chairman of the Remuneration Committee, Jonathan Dawson, to discuss the Board changes that have taken place during the year and the associated remuneration arrangements.

The Board receives regular feedback on investor perceptions and opinions about the Company. Specialist advisors and the Director of Investor Relations provide updates on market sentiment.

Each year, the Board receives the results of an independent audit of investor perceptions. Interviews with key investors were carried out to establish their views on the performance of the business and management. The findings and recommendations of the audit were discussed in depth by the Board.

Debt investors

Over the last year representatives from our treasury team, together with other senior managers from across the business, have met with debt investors in Europe, Canada and the US to discuss various topics such as the full-year results.

We also communicate with our debt investors through regular announcements and the debt investor section of our website. This contains bond prospectuses, credit ratings, materials relating to the retail bond issued in 2011 and subsidiary year-end reports. The website also contains information about the long-term debt maturity profile, so investors can see our future refinancing needs.

Individual shareholders

Engagement with individual shareholders, who represent more than 95% of the total number of shareholders on our share register, is led by the Group General Counsel & Company Secretary. Shareholders are invited to learn more about the Company through the exhibits at our AGM and the shareholder networking programme.

The shareholder networking programme includes visits to UK operational sites and presentations by senior managers and employees over two days. UK resident shareholders can apply to take part online via the Investors section of our website.

Annual General Meeting (AGM)

Our AGM will be held on Tuesday 21 July 2015 at The International Convention Centre in Birmingham and broadcast via our website. The Notice of Meeting for the 2015 AGM, available on our website, sets out in full the resolutions for consideration by shareholders, together with explanatory notes and further information on the Directors standing for election and re-election.

How our Board operates

The Chairman sets the Board’s agenda in line with its responsibilities as set out in the matters reserved for the Board. Consideration is also given to the main challenges and opportunities facing the Company, making sure adequate time is available to discuss all items, including strategic issues.duties.

 

To support discussion and decision making, Board and committee members receive papers sufficiently in advance of meetings so that they can prepare for and consider agenda items. Additionally, the Chairman holds a short meeting with the Non-executive Directors before each Board meeting to discuss the focus of the upcoming meeting as well as afterwards to share feedback and discuss the dynamics offrom the meeting. Similarly, the Chief Executive holds a short meeting with the Executive Directors and other senior management in attendancethe Group General Counsel & Company Secretary after each meeting and shares the feedback from these meetings with the Chairman.

 

As set out in the table of actions from last year’s Board and committee evaluation process, during theLast year we engaged external specialists to review our current papers and develop a new reporting framework for the Board and its committees.Committees. This has resultedcontinued to result in clearer more concise reports,reporting, allowing more time for discussionquality discussions and questions. A clear set of guidelines are in place to assist the Executive Directors and management on the content and presentation of papers to the Board and committees. A further refresh of the Board paper process will commence this year.

B.6 Evaluation

See pages 52 and 53 for more information on our externally facilitated Board evaluation, undertaken by Independent Audit Limited.

 

During the year, the Chairman met each Director individually to discuss their contribution, performance over the year and training and development needs. Following these meetings, Sir Peter confirmed to the Nominations Committee that he considered that each Director demonstrated commitment to the role and their performance continued to be effective.

At a private meeting of the Non-executive Directors, Mark Williamson, as Senior Independent Director, led a review of the Chairman’s performance. The Non-executive Directors, with input from the Executive Directors, assessed his ability to fulfil his role as Chairman and considered the arrangements he has in place, given he is also chairman of a FTSE 250 company and the Aircraft Carrier Alliance Management Board and a Trustee of The Sutton Trust Board. They concluded that Sir Peter’s performance continued to be effective.

B.7 Election/re-election

Each Director is subject to election at the first AGM following their appointment, and re-election at each subsequent AGM. Following recommendations from the Nominations Committee the Board considers all Directors continue to be effective, committed to their roles and have sufficient time available to perform their duties. Therefore, in accordance with the Code, Nicola Shaw will seek election and all other Directors will seek re-election at the 2016 AGM as set out in the Notice of Meeting, with the exception of Steve Holliday who is retiring from the Company with effect from 22 July 2016.

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Statement of compliance with the UK Corporate Governance Code65


Corporate Governancecontinued

Statement of compliance with the UK

Corporate Governance Codecontinued

C. Accountability

D. Remuneration

E. Relations with shareholders

C.1 Financial and business reporting

The requirement for Directors to state that they consider the Annual Report and Accounts, taken as a whole, is fair, balanced and understandable remains a key consideration in the drafting and review process. The coordination and review of the Annual Report is conducted in parallel with the formal audit process undertaken by the external auditors and the review by the Board and its committees (of relevant sections).

The drafting and assurance process supports the Audit Committee’s and Board’s assessment of the overall fairness, balance and clarity of the Annual Report and the statement of Directors’ responsibilities as set out on page 84. The independent auditor’s report is on pages 85 to 92 and the Company’s business model is on pages 14 and 15.

C.2 Risk management and internal control

The Board has carried out a robust assessment of the principal risks facing the Company including those that would threaten the business model, future performance, solvency or liquidity. Further details can be found on pages 27 and 28.

The Board also sets the Company’s risk appetite, internal controls and risk management processes. The Board undertakes a review of their effectiveness annually. Further details are set out on pages 26–29.

The activities of the Audit Committee, which assists the Board with its responsibilities in relation to risk and assurance, are set out on pages 54 to 58.

C.3 Audit Committee and auditors

The Audit Committee report on pages 54 to 58 sets out details of how the Committee has discharged its duties during the year, matters reviewed by the Committee and how it ensures the auditor’s objectivity, effectiveness and continued independence. The Audit Committee report also explains the audit tender process that was undertaken during the year.

 

 

D.1 The level and components of remuneration

The Remuneration Committee is responsible for recommending to the Board the remuneration policy for Executive Directors and other members of the Executive Committee and for the Chairman, and for implementing this policy. The aim is to align remuneration policy to Company strategy and key business objectives and make sure it reflects our shareholders’, customers’ and regulators’ interests.

The Remuneration Report on pages 68 to 81 outlines the activities of the Committee during the year and sets out excerpts of the Directors’ remuneration policy table as approved by shareholders at the 2014 AGM.

D.2 Procedure

For further information on the work of the Remuneration Committee and Directors’ remuneration packages see the Directors’ Remuneration Report on pages 68 to 81. The Committee’s terms of reference are available on our website.

E.1 Dialogue with shareholders

The Board as a whole is responsible for making sure that satisfactory dialogue with shareholders takes place. We believe that effective channels of communication with the Company’s debt and equity institutional investors and individual shareholders are very important. More information about our approach to relations with shareholders can be found on page 51.

E.2 Constructive use of General Meetings

The AGM provides a key opportunity for the Board to communicate with and meet shareholders. Shareholders are able to learn more about the Company through exhibits and can ask questions directly of the Board. Company representatives and our Registrar are also on hand to answer any questions shareholders might have.

Our AGM will be held on Monday 25 July 2016 at The International Convention Centre in Birmingham and broadcast via our website. The Notice of Meeting for the 2016 AGM, available on our website, sets out in full the resolutions for consideration by shareholders, together with explanatory notes and further information on the Directors standing for election and re-election.

 

66National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Corporate Governance


LOGO

Corporate Governance
Index to Directors’ Report and other disclosures
(starting on page indicated)
AGM 66
Articles of Association 187
Audit information 84
Board of Directors 47
Business model 14
Change of control provisions 193
Code of Ethics 193
Conflicts of interest 193
Contractual and other arrangements 176
Directors’ indemnity 194
Directors’ share interests 79
Directors’ service contracts and letters of appointment 74
Diversity 44
Dividends 05
Events after the reporting period 188
Financial instruments 126
Future developments 08
Greenhouse gas emissions 21
Human Rights 194
Important events affecting the Company during the year 06
Internal control 26
Internal control over financial reporting 29
Listing Rule 9.8.4 R cross reference table 194
Material interests in shares 189
People 44
Political donations and expenditure 194
Research and development 194
Risk management 26
Share capital 189
National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16
Index to Directors’ Report and other disclosures
67


Directors’ Remuneration Report

Jonathan Dawson

Committee chairman        

LOGO

Annual statement from the

Remuneration Committee chairman

Overview

At the Company’s AGM in 2015 more than 97% of votes cast were to approve the Remuneration Report for that year. As with last year we are not proposing any changes to the formal remuneration policy for National Grid and so this year there is only a vote on the implementation of this policy.

The key elements of our policy are:

●  significant weighting towards long-term incentives versus short-term incentives;
the bulk of senior executive remuneration to be paid in National Grid shares, with all of the Long Term Performance Plan (LTPP) paid only in shares, and half of the Annual Performance Plan (APP) paid in shares;
very high levels of personal shareholding required to be held by senior executives – 500% of pre-tax salary for the CEO and 400% for other Executive Directors;
three-year performance period for measuring potential awards under the LTPP coupled with a holding period of a further two years irrespective of whether the mandatory personal shareholding target has been attained; and

performance metrics for the LTPP are RoE (measuring management’s performance in generating profit from the business) and Value Growth (measuring management’s longer term performance in creating shareholder value).

We believe that our policy ensures that the rewards paid to senior executives are closely matched with shareholders’ experience. In particular, we regard it as very important that senior executives see their annual remuneration in the context of a long-term build-up of their investment in National Grid and that the growth in value of their shareholding and the dividends paid on those shares represent a material personal financial exposure to the success of the Company. As a result we think that the overall remuneration structure illustrates a high level of alignment with shareholders, and promotes an appropriate focus on long-term value within the Company.

Performance for the year

APP

National Grid has had another successful year overall. Record capital investment of £3.9 billion has been undertaken, split equally between the UK and US, and a programme of critical rate case filings has been successfully initiated in the US. As in prior years, the EPS figure used for APP purposes, 62.3 pence, differs slightly from the reported figure of 63.5 pence as it is adjusted for the impact of timing, scrip dividend uptake and exchange rate effects. It has also been reduced to take account of the absence of an increase in the UK corporate tax rate originally included

in the Group budget. The overall impact of these adjustments was a decrease of 1.2 pence. Similarly, the Group RoE figure used for the APP calculation, 12.0%, has been reduced by 0.3 percentage points to take account of the absence of the increase in the UK corporate tax rate referred to above. Notwithstanding this, the EPS of 62.3 pence and Group RoE of 12.0% both met or exceededthe stretch performance levels set by the Committee at the start of the year, benefitting from realised gains achieved from the exchange of National Grid USA’s share in the Iroquois pipeline joint venture and strong results from our Other businesses led by the performance of the French interconnector. In the UK, the regulated businesses delivered good returns of 13.3%. Regulated US RoE was 8.0%, which reflected steady performance though was down on last year due to continued cost pressures as the business awaits outcomes of rate case filings. This figure, however, does not capture the gains achieved from the exchange of National Grid USA’s share in the Iroquois pipeline joint venture referred to above, and therefore has been adjusted by the Committee to reflect half of this gain for US participants in the APP, which the Committee believes properly reflects performance.

As a result, in respect of the financial measures for the APP (representing 70% of the value of the APP) the Committee made awards to Executive Directors ranging from 75% to 100% of the maximum potential for financial performance. The balance of the award (30% by value) is represented by individual executives’ assessed performance against specific objectives set by the Committee at the start of the year, resulting in awards ranging from 80% to 86% of the maximum potential for individual performance. In aggregate, therefore, Executive Directors’ APP awards fall in the range of 95% to 119% of salary. This compares with last year’s APP awards where the range was 65% to 119% of salary.

Because of commercial sensitivity we retrospectively disclose annual targets for the APP, which are set out on page 76. This year, we have sought to enhance our disclosure, including the retrospective disclosure of threshold and stretch performance levels for EPS and Group RoE, which now sits alongside the disclosure of our LTPP threshold and stretch performance levels. Target performance levels for both EPS and Group RoE were higher than for 2014/15; however, the target performance levels for UK RoE and US RoE were reduced, due to the expected returns under the RIIO framework in the UK and the impact of the timing of rate plan filings in the US. We have decided to maintain the same performance metrics for the 2016/17 APP awards and we will repeat our retrospective disclosure of performance levels in next year’s remuneration report.

LTPP

The LTPP that vested in 2015/16 was that awarded in 2012. Vesting outcomes ranged from 63% to 76% of maximum. Before making its final determination of executives’ annual and long-term awards, the Committee gives careful consideration to a number of important non-financial measures including our safety performance, reliability and levels of customer satisfaction in both the UK and the US, and considers whether a downward adjustment should be made to any executive’s award. This year the Committee concluded that there was no reason to make any adjustment. As our Executive Director, US, Dean Seavers, only joined the Board at the beginning of 2015/16, he has not received any vested LTPP for this year, and will not do so until 2017.

The award made in 2015 is the second award in respect of the LTPP granted under the new remuneration policy in 2014. This is a three-year plan with a maximum award of 350% of salary for the CEO and 300% for the other Executive Directors. Its outcome will only be known

 

 

      4868National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Corporate Governance 


 

   Corporate Governance

following the results for the year ending March 2017. I reported last year that, at the end of the first performance year, Group RoE and Value Growth were on target in relation to the parameters set by the Committee, with UK RoE around stretch and US RoE below threshold. For this year the position is broadly comparable in respect of both the 2014 and 2015 LTPP grants. Taking account of performance to date of the 2014 and 2015 LTPP awards, the Committee has decided to make no changes to the performance metrics and targets for the 2016 LTPP award.

Executive Director shareholdings

Two years ago, we introduced high levels of shareholding requirements for our Executive Directors, in order to further align them to our shareholders. At 31 March 2016, both Andrew Bonfield and Steve Holliday have exceeded these shareholding requirements. As John Pettigrew and Dean Seavers were appointed to the Board relatively recently, neither of them has yet met their shareholding requirements and will therefore not be given permission to sell shares until they have done so, other than to pay tax on receipt of the vested shares or in exceptional circumstances.

Changes to the Board

Following the announcement of Steve Holliday’s retirement as CEO, John Pettigrew was promoted to CEO with effect from 1 April 2016. John’s salary has been set at £825,000. His APP opportunity remains at 125% of salary, and his LTPP opportunity has increased to 350% of salary from 2016 onwards. Steve stepped down as CEO on 31 March 2016 but will remain on the Board until 22 July to facilitate a successful transition. In March, we announced that Nicola Shaw will join the Board as our new UK Executive Director on 1 July 2016, succeeding John. Nicola’s salary has been set at £450,000. Her APP opportunity is 125% of salary and her LTPP opportunity is 300% of salary. Nicola will be eligible to receive a 2016 LTPP award. In addition, she will receive a cash payment of up to £485,000 to compensate her for incentive cash awards that were due to vest in June 2016 that she has foregone on leaving her former employer. Subject to their individual performance, the Committee intends to increase each of John’s and Nicola’s salaries towards market level by way of future phased increases from 2017 in excess of those awarded to other Company employees. All of these arrangements are in line with the approved policy on recruitment remuneration and have already been announced.

Annual salary review

Steve Holliday’s and Andrew Bonfield’s annual salaries were increased by approximately 1% in 2015. In line with the US managerial pay budget, Dean Seavers’ annual

salary was not increased in 2015. John Pettigrew’s salary was increased by 7% to move his salary closer towards market as Executive Director, UK in 2015. In line with regional managerial pay budgets in 2016, salary increases in 2016 are 2% for Andrew Bonfield and 2.5% for Dean Seavers.

Impact of the expected sale of a majority interest in the UK Gas Distribution business

Ahead of the expected sale of a majority interest in the Gas Distribution business in 2016/17, the Committee is considering the impact on inflight LTPP and APP awards, and will make appropriate adjustments to relevant metrics within both the parameters and the spirit of the remuneration policy following any such sale. We will report this to you in next year’s remuneration report.

Conclusion

As I reported last year, remuneration continues to be in a transitional phase since the APP maximum has been lowered to 125% of salary from 150% while the LTPP represents previous bases of measurements, timescales and policy limits. This transition will continue for a further year when the final element of the 2013 LTPP vests in 2017 and the 2014 LTPP (the first awarded under the current remuneration policy) matures.

As with last year, we are not seeking any changes to the current remuneration policy, which will expire at the 2017 AGM. The Committee has begun to address whether the current policy should be proposed without any material changes or whether some modification may be required to reflect changes in the market and the evolution of the Company. I will report on the outcome of this review next year when we will seek your authority for a new three-year policy mandate.

Regarding the 2015/16 year, the Committee believes that it has correctly implemented the approved policy and that the remuneration earned last year by senior executives properly reflects the performance of the Company and the value generated for shareholders. Accordingly, I commend this remuneration report to you on behalf of the Committee, and ask for your support for the resolution to approve the report at the AGM.

LOGO

Jonathan Dawson

Committee chairman

 

At a glance

 

 

Performance

A comparison of the total 2015/16 single total figure of remuneration to the maximum remuneration if variable pay had vested in full is set out below.

 

 

 

Total remuneration

      

 

LOGO

 

Executive Director  Maximum
remuneration
£’000
   

2015/16 single figure  
remuneration  

£’000  

  

Andrew Bonfield

   4,077    3,228    

Steve Holliday

   6,478    5,151    

John Pettigrew

   1,815    1,569    

Dean Seavers

   1,883    1,684    
      

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16At a glance69


Corporate Governancecontinued

At a glancecontinued

Key features of policy

Annual report on remuneration

for 2015/16

LOGO     Targeted broadly at mid-market against FTSE 11-40 for UK Executive Directors and general industry and energy services companies with similar revenue for US Executive Directors

Salary increases of 0–7% for 2015

Salary increases of 2–2.5% for 2016

Hired Nicola Shaw as new Executive Director, UK on an annual base salary of £450,000

Appointed John Pettigrew as CEO on an annual base salary of £825,000

LOGO

Maximum opportunity is 125% of salary70% based on financial metrics (35% EPS, 35% RoE), 30% based on individual objectives
50% paid in cash, 50% paid in shares, which must be retained until later of two years and meeting shareholding requirement
Group RoE for CEO and Finance Director; UK RoE for Executive Director, UK; US RoE for Executive Director, US
Subject to both clawback and malus

Individual objectives cover: safety and compliance; Group and financial strategy; business growth; operational excellence; customer experience; employee engagement; capability development; and stakeholder relations

LOGO

Maximum award level is 350% of salary for CEO and 300% for other Executive Directors50% value growth, 50% RoE
Group RoE for CEO and Finance Director; even split of Group and UK RoE for Executive Director, UK; even split of Group and US RoE for Executive Director, US
Vesting subject to long-term performance conditions. Shares must be retained until later of two years from vesting and meeting shareholding requirement
Three-year performance period

Subject to both clawback and malus

LOGO

External appointees participate in Defined Contribution (DC) plan or cash in lieu of pension; internal appointees retain current benefits, subject to capping of pensionable pay increases for Defined Benefit (DB) plansUK DB (Steve Holliday, John Pettigrew): maximum of two-thirds final capped pensionable pay or (Steve Holliday) one thirtieth accrual
UK cash allowance (Andrew Bonfield): 30% of salary
Pensionable pay is salary only in UK and salary and APP in US in alignment with the market
US DC (Dean Seavers): 9% of pensionable pay with additional match of up to 4%
Other benefits as appropriate

Other benefits include private medical insurance, life assurance, and, for UK Executive Directors, either a fully expensed car or a cash alternative to a car and the use of a driver when required

LOGO

500% of salary for CEOSteve Holliday and Andrew Bonfield have both met their shareholding requirements

400% of salary for other

Executive Directors

John Pettigrew and Dean Seavers were appointed to the Board relatively recently, and therefore have not yet met their shareholding requirements

70National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Corporate Governance


   Corporate Governance

Directors’ remuneration policy – approved by shareholders in 2014

Key aspects of the Directors’ remuneration policy, along with elements particularly applicable to the 2015/16 financial year are shown on pages 71–74 for ease of reference only. This policy was approved for three years from the date of the 2014 AGM held on 28 July 2014. A shareholder vote on the remuneration policy is not required in 2016. Please note that the information shown has been updated to take account of the fact that the policy is now approved and current rather than proposed. A copy of the full remuneration policy is available on the Company website atwww.investors.nationalgrid.com/reports/2013-14.

There may be circumstances from time to time when the Committee will consider it appropriate to apply some judgement and exercise discretion in respect of the approved policy. This ability to apply discretion is highlighted where relevant in the policy, and the use of discretion will always be in the spirit of the approved policy.

Our peer group

The Committee benchmarks its remuneration policy against appropriate peer groups annually to make sure we remain competitive in the relevant markets. The primary focus for reward benchmarking is the FTSE 11-40 for UK-based Executive Directors and general industry and energy services companies with similar levels of revenue for US-based Executive Directors. These peer groups are considered appropriate for a large, complex, international and predominantly regulated business.

Approved policy table – Executive Directors

Salary

Purpose and link to strategy: to attract, motivate and retain high-calibre individuals, while not overpaying.

Operation

Maximum levels

Performance metrics, weighting
and time period applicable

Salaries are targeted broadly at mid-market level.

No prescribed maximum annual increase.Not applicable.

They are generally reviewed annually. Salary reviews take into account:

  business and individual contribution;

  the individual’s skills and experience;

  scope of the role, including any changes in responsibility; and

  market data in the relevant comparator group.

Any increases are generally aligned to salary increases received by other Company employees and to market movement. Increases in excess of this may be made at the Committee’s discretion in circumstances such as a significant change in responsibility; progression in the role; and alignment to market level.

BenefitsPurpose and link to strategy: to provide competitive and cost-effective benefits to attract and retain high-calibre individuals.

Operation

Maximum levels

Performance metrics, weighting
and time period applicable

Benefits provided include:

Benefits have no predetermined maximum, as the cost of providing these varies from year to year.

Participation in tax-approved all-employee share plans is subject to limits set by the relevant tax authorities from time to time.

Not applicable.

● 

company car or a cash alternative (UK only);

use of a driver when required;

private medical insurance;

life assurance;

personal accident insurance;

opportunity to purchase additional benefits under flexible benefits schemes available to all employees; and

opportunity to participate in the following HM Revenue & Customs (UK) or Internal Revenue Service (US) tax-advantaged all-employee share plans:

Sharesave: UK employees may make monthly contributions from net salary for a period of three or five years. The savings can be used to purchase shares at a discounted price, set at the launch of each plan period.

Share Incentive Plan (SIP): UK employees may use gross salary to purchase shares. These shares are placed in trust.

Incentive Thrift Plans (401(k) plans): US employees may participate in these tax-advantaged savings plans. They are DC pension plans in which employees can invest their own and Company contributions.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP) (423(b) plan): eligible US employees may purchase ADSs on a monthly basis at a discounted price.

Other benefits may be offered at the discretion of the Committee.

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Directors’ remuneration policy – approved by shareholders in 201471


Corporate Governancecontinued

Directors’ remuneration policy – approved by shareholders in 2014continued

Pension

Purpose and link to strategy: to reward sustained contribution and assist attraction and retention.

Performance metrics, weighting

OperationMaximum levelsand time period applicable

Pension for a new Executive Director will reflect whether they are internally promoted or externally appointed.

UK DB a maximum pension on retirement, at age 60, of two thirds final capped pensionable pay or up to one thirtieth accrual. On death in service, a lump sum of four times pensionable pay and a two thirds dependant’s pension is provided.

UK DC annual contributions of 30% of salary. Life assurance provision of four times pensionable salary and a spouse’s pension equal to one third of the Director’s salary are provided on death in service.

US DB an Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan provides for an unreduced pension benefit at age 62. For retirements at age 62 with 35 years of service, the pension benefit would be approximately two thirds of pensionable pay. Upon death in service, the spouse would receive 50% of the pension benefit (100% if the participant died while an active employee after the age of 55).

US DC 9% of base salary plus APP with additional 401(k) plan match of up to 4%.

Not applicable.

If internally promoted:

retention of existing DB benefits without enhancement, except for capping of pensionable pay increases following promotion to Board; or
retention of existing UK DC benefits or equivalent cash in lieu;
or
retention of existing US DC benefits plus 401(k) plan match, provided through 401(k) plan and non-qualified plans.

If externally appointed:

UK DC benefits or equivalent cash in lieu; or
US DC benefits plus 401(k) plan match.

Andrew Bonfield, John Pettigrew and Dean Seavers are treated in line with the above policy.

Steve Holliday is provided with final salary pension benefits. For service prior to 1 April 2013, pensionable pay is normally the base salary in the 12 months prior to leaving the Company. For service from 1 April 2013 increases to pensionable pay are capped at the lower of 3% or the increase in inflation. The pension scheme rules allow for indexed prior salaries to be used for all members. He participates in the unfunded scheme in respect of benefits in excess of the Lifetime Allowance.

In line with market practice, pensionable pay for UK-based Executive Directors includes salary only and for US-based Executive Directors it includes salary and APP award.

Annual Performance Plan

Purpose and link to strategy: to incentivise and reward the achievement of annual financial and strategic business targets and the delivery of annual individual objectives.

Performance metrics, weighting

OperationMaximum levelsand time period applicable

Performance metrics and targets are agreed at the start of each financial year. Performance metrics are aligned with strategic business priorities. Targets are set with reference to the budget. Awards are paid in June.

For APP awards made in 2013/14, 50% of any award was deferred into shares in the Deferred Share Plan (DSP). The DSP has no performance conditions and vests after three years, subject to continued employment. These shares are subject to forfeiture for leavers in certain circumstances.

The DSP was discontinued for APP awards made in respect of years from 2014/15. Instead, 50% of awards are paid in shares, which (after any sales to pay tax) must be retained until the shareholding requirement is met, and in any event for two years after receipt.

Awards are subject to clawback and malus provisions.

The maximum award is 125% of salary.

A significant majority of the APP is based on performance against corporate financial measures, with the remainder based on performance against individual objectives. Individual objectives are role-specific.

The Committee may use its discretion to set measures that it considers appropriate in each financial year and reduce the amount payable, taking account of significant safety or customer service standard incidents, environmental and governance issues.

The payout levels at threshold, target and stretch performance levels are 0%, 50% and 100% respectively.

72National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Corporate Governance


   Corporate Governance

Long Term Performance Plan

Purpose and link to strategy: to drive long-term performance, aligning Executive Director incentives to key strategic objectives and shareholder interests.

OperationMaximum levels

Performance metrics, weighting

and time period applicable

Awards of shares may be granted each year, with vesting subject to long-term performance conditions.

The performance metrics have been chosen as the Committee believes they reflect the creation of long-term value within the business. Targets are set each year with reference to the business plan.

Awards are subject to clawback and malus provisions. Notwithstanding the level of award achieved against the performance conditions, the Committee may use its discretion to reduce the amount vesting, and in particular will take account of compliance with the dividend policy.

For awards granted from 2014, participants must retain vested shares (after any sales to pay tax) until the shareholding requirement is met, and in any event for a further two years after vesting.

The maximum award for the CEO is 350% of salary and it is 300% of salary for the other Executive Directors.

For awards made between 2011 and 2013, the maximum award for the CEO was 225% of salary and 200% for the other Executive Directors.

For awards between 2011 and 2013 the performance measures and weightings were:

●  adjusted EPS (50%) measured over three years;
TSR relative to the FTSE 100 (25%) measured over three years; and
UK or US RoE relative to allowed regulatory returns (25%) measured over four years.

From 2014, the performance measures are:

value growth and Group RoE (for the CEO and Finance Director); and
value growth, Group RoE and UK or US RoE (for the UK and US Executive Directors respectively).

All are measured over a three-year period.

The weightings of these measures may vary year to year, but would always remain such that the value growth metric would never fall below a 25% weighting and never rise above a 75% weighting.

Between 2011 and 2013, 25% of the award vested at threshold and 100% at stretch, with straight-line vesting in between. From 2014, only 20% of the award vests at threshold.

Approved policy table – Non-executive Directors (NEDs)

Fees for NEDs

Purpose and link to strategy: to attract NEDs who have a broad range of experience and skills to oversee the implementation of our strategy.

Operation

Maximum levels

Performance metrics, weighting and
time period applicable

NED fees (excluding those of the Chairman) are set by the Executive Committee in conjunction with the Chairman; the Chairman’s fees are set by the Committee.

Fee structure:

  Chairman fee;

  basic fee, which differs for UK- and US-based NEDs;

  committee membership fee;

  committee chair fee; and

  Senior Independent Director fee.

There are no maximum fee levels.

The benefits provided to the Chairman are not subject to a predetermined maximum cost,

as the cost of providing these

varies from year to year.

Not applicable.

Fees are reviewed every year and are benchmarked against those in companies of similar scale and complexity.

NEDs do not participate in incentive or pension plans and, with the exception of the Chairman, are not eligible to receive benefits. The Chairman is covered by the Company’s private medical and personal accident insurance plans and receives a fully expensed car or cash alternative to a car, with the use of a driver, when required.

There is no provision for termination payments.

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Directors’ remuneration policy – approved by shareholders in 201473


Corporate Governancecontinued

Directors’ remuneration policy – approved by shareholders in 2014continued

 

Shareholding requirement

The requirement of Executive Directors to build up and hold a relatively high value of National Grid shares ensures they share a significant level of risk with shareholders and their interests are aligned.

From 2014/15, Executive Directors are required to build up and retain shares in the Company. The level of holding required is 500% of salary for the CEO and 400% of salary for the other Executive Directors.

Unless the shareholding requirement is met, Executive Directors will not be permitted to sell shares, other than to pay tax or in exceptional circumstances.

Policy on recruitment remuneration

Salaries for new Executive Directors appointed to the Board will be set in accordance with the terms of the approved remuneration policy in force at the time of appointment, and in particular will take account of the appointee’s skills and experience as well as the scope and market rate for the role.

Where appropriate, salaries may be set below market level initially, with the Committee retaining discretion to award increases in salary in excess of those of the wider workforce and inflation to bring salary to a market level over time, where this is justified by individual and Company performance.

Benefits consistent with those offered to other Executive Directors under the approved remuneration policy in force at the time of appointment will be offered, taking account of local market practice. The Committee may also agree that the Company will meet certain costs associated with the recruitment, for example legal fees, and the Committee may agree to meet certain relocation expenses or provide tax equalisation as appropriate.

Pensions for new Executive Directors appointed to the Board will be set in accordance with the terms of the approved remuneration policy in force at the time of appointment.

Ongoing incentive pay (APP and LTPP) for new Executive Directors will be in accordance with the approved remuneration policy in force at the time of appointment. This means the maximum APP award in any year would be 125% of salary and the maximum LTPP award would be 300% of salary (350% of salary for a new CEO).

For an externally appointed Executive Director, the Company may offer additional cash or share-based payments that it considers necessary to buy out current entitlements from the former employer that will be lost on recruitment to National Grid. Any such arrangements would reflect the delivery mechanisms, time horizons and levels of conditionality of the remuneration lost.

In order to facilitate buy-out arrangements as described above, existing incentive arrangements will be used to the extent possible, although awards may also be granted outside of these shareholder-approved schemes if necessary and as permitted under the Listing Rules.

For an internally appointed Executive Director, any outstanding variable pay element awarded in respect of the prior role will continue on its original terms.

Fees for a new Chairman or Non-executive Director will be set in line with the approved policy in force at the time of appointment.

Policy on payment for loss of office

In line with our policy, all Executive Directors have service contracts which are terminable by either party with 12 months’ notice.

The contracts contain provisions for payment in lieu of notice, at the sole and absolute discretion of the Company. Such payments are limited to payment of salary only for the remainder of the notice period. In the UK such payments would be phased on a monthly basis, over a period no greater than 12 months, and the Executive Director would be expected to mitigate any losses where employment is taken up during the notice period. In the US, for tax purposes the policy is to make any payment in lieu of notice as soon as reasonably practicable, and in any event within two and a half months of the later of 31 December and 31 March immediately following the notice date.

In the event of a UK Director being made redundant, statutory compensation would apply and the relevant pension plan rules may result in the early payment of an unreduced pension.

On termination of employment, no APP award would generally be payable and any DSP awards would generally lapse. However, the Committee has the discretion to deem an individual to be a ‘good leaver’, in which case an APP award would be payable on the termination date, based on performance during the financial year up to termination, and DSP awards would vest on the termination date. Examples of circumstances in which a Director would be treated as a ‘good leaver’ include redundancy, retirement, illness, injury, disability and death. Any APP award would be prorated and would be subject to performance achieved against the objectives for that year.

On termination of employment, outstanding awards under the share plans will be treated in accordance with the relevant plan rules approved by shareholders. Share awards would normally lapse. ‘Good leaver’ provisions apply at the Committee’s discretion and in specified circumstances, including redundancy, retirement, illness, injury, disability and death, where awards will be released to the departing Executive Director or, in the case of death, to their estate. Long-term share plan awards held by ‘good leavers’ may vest subject to performance measured at the normal vesting date and are prorated. Such awards would vest at the same time as for other participants.

The Chairman’s appointment is subject to six months’ notice by either party; for the other Non-executive Directors, notice is one month. No compensation is payable to Non-executive Directors if required to stand down.

 

74National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Corporate Governance


   Corporate Governance

Annual report on remuneration

Statement of implementation of remuneration policy in 2015/16

Role of Remuneration Committee

The Committee is responsible for recommending to the Board the remuneration policy for Executive Directors and the other members of the Executive Committee and for the Chairman, and for implementing this policy. The aim is to align remuneration policy to Company strategy and key business objectives and ensure it reflects our shareholders’, customers’ and regulators’ interests. The members of the Remuneration Committee in 2015/16 were Nora Mead Brownell, Jonathan Dawson (chair), Paul Golby and Mark Williamson.

The Committee activities during the year

MeetingMain areas of discussion

April

2014/15 individual objectives scoring for Executive Committee

Discussion of 2015/16 objectives for Executive Committee
Review of Executive Committee shareholdings

Review of Committee terms of reference

May

Annual salary review and LTPP proposals for Executive Committee

2014/15 APP financial outturns and individual performance and confirmation of awards
Final approval of 2015/16 objectives for Executive Committee
Final approval of APP targets for 2015/16 financial year
Review of gender and ethnicity pay statistics

October

Approval of remuneration package for incoming CEO and of payments

on retirement for outgoing CEO

November

Update on corporate governance and disclosure issues and review of AGM outcomes

Directors’ Remuneration Report planning for 2016
Review of competitive benchmarking for secondary comparator groups
Review of gender and ethnicity pay statistics disclosure for external website

Update on 2015/16 APP and outstanding LTPPs

March

Approval of remuneration package for incoming Executive Director, UK

Benchmarking data review for Executive Committee remuneration
2016 Directors’ Remuneration Report – review of first draft
Discussion of metrics and targets for APP and LTPP for 2016/17

Review of objectives for Executive Committee for APP 2016/17

 

Board membership and attendance

Attendance is expressed as the number of meetings attended out of the number possible or applicable for the individual Director during the year to 31 March 2015.

Our Board and its committees

The Board delegates authority to its committees to carry out certain tasks on its behalf, so that it can operate efficiently and give the right level of attention and consideration to relevant matters.

The role and responsibilities of the committees are set out in their respective terms of reference, available on our website. The committee structure, delegation and reporting lines are set out in the diagram below.

In addition to the vertical lines of responsibility and reporting, the committees communicate and work together where required. For example, on some risk matters the SEH Committee collaborates with the Audit Committee. These lines of communication are shown in the diagram below.

Committee agendas and schedules of items to be discussed at future meetings are prepared in line with the terms of reference of each committee and take account of other topical matters.

At committee meetings, items are discussed and, as appropriate, matters are endorsed, approved or recommended to the Board by the committee. Following meetings, the chairman of each committee provides the Board with a summary of the main decisions and discussion points so the non-committee members are kept up to date.

Below the Board committees are a number of management committees, including the Executive Committee.

The Executive Committee has responsibility for making management and operational decisions about the day-to-day running of the Company. Further information on some of the management committees, including the membership and operation of the Executive Committee, is set out on pages 58 and 59.

Reports from each of the Board committees together with details of their activities during the year, are set out on the following pages.

NameAttendance  

Sir Peter Gershon

10 of 10  

Steve Holliday

10 of 10  

Andrew Bonfield

10 of 10  

Tom King1

10 of 10  

John Pettigrew

10 of 10  

Nora Mead Brownell

10 of 10  

Jonathan Dawson

10 of 10  

Therese Esperdy

10 of 10  

Paul Golby

10 of 10  

Ruth Kelly

10 of 10  

Mark Williamson

10 of 10  

Nick Winser2

3 of 3  

Philip Aiken3

9 of 9  

Maria Richter2

3 of 3  

1.  Tom King stepped down from the Board with effect from 31 March 2015.

2.  Nick Winser and Maria Richter stepped down from the Board with effect from

28 July 2014.

3.  Philip Aiken stepped down from the Board on 25 February 2015.

Dean Seavers was appointed to the Board with effect from 1 April 2015.

Committee membership during the year and attendance at meetings is set out in each of the individual committee reports later in this report.

Should any Director not be able to attend a Board or committee meeting, the Chairman and committee chairman are informed and the absent Director is encouraged to communicate opinions and comments on the matters to be considered.

LOGO

LOGO

        NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/1549                    


Corporate Governance

Corporate Governancecontinued

Audit Committee

LOGO

Role

Oversees the Company’s financial reporting, and internal controls and their effectiveness, together with the procedures for identifying, assessing and reporting risks. It also oversees the services provided by the external auditors and their remuneration.

Review of the year

Challenging management on the action they are taking to continue to improve the US financial controls environment has remained a focus for the Committee over the past 12 months. Although there is work still to do, I am pleased to report we are now seeing steady progress in this area.

The US leadership team has been strengthened with the appointment of a new US Chief Financial Officer (CFO). The Finance Director and the US CFO have continued to keep the Committee up to date on progress with regular reports throughout the year on further proposed improvements and priorities.

The past year has also seen two other key appointments – a new Head of Corporate Audit (approved by the Committee in accordance with its terms of reference) and a new Head of Assurance. The Committee has received reports from both individuals on their initial observations of their respective functions and proposed changes and priorities for the year.

Following the delegation by the Board for oversight of risk management in relation to cyber security, the Committee received its first update from internal (corporate) audit on the process for identifying, mitigating, monitoring and responding to cyber security risks in March.

The Committee has been briefed on the changes to the regulatory environment, in particular the audit tender regulations published by the Financial Reporting Council, the implications of the Competition and Market Authority Order and the final European Commission regulations. We discussed and considered the timing of a tender for the external audit and agreed that an audit tender process should be run later this year. See page 53 for further details.

Committee membership has also undergone some changes. Maria Richter stepped down from the Board at the 2014 AGM. In 2015 we have said goodbye to Philip Aiken and welcomed Paul Golby and Therese Esperdy to the Committee in February and April respectively. I would like to thank Phil for his contribution and support to the Committee over the last six years. We are looking forward to working with Paul and Therese over what will be another busy year.

Significant issues

The most significant issue the Audit Committee considered in relation to the financial statements during the year were the US financial controls. The Committee also considered the presentation of exceptional items, the treatment of the liability management programme costs and accounting for agreed legal settlements. More detail is provided later in the report.

Other matters reviewed

Examples of other matters the Audit Committee reviewed:

The new Group consolidation system. Regular progress updates on the implementation which is expected to go live later this year.

Lessons learnt from the March 2014 year-end audit. The Committee noted the detailed plans produced by management and the external auditors to deliver a more efficient March 2015 year-end process, including the timing of certain audit testing and the approach to subsidiary statutory and regulatory accounts.

Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 testing and attestations. The Committee received regular updates on the status of testing and considered the impact of deficiencies reported at the May 2014 meeting. During the year, the Company adopted the revised framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Subsequently, a review of all internal controls of financial reporting was undertaken to ensure compliance with the updated framework. See page 41 for the Company’s statement on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.

Accounting for rate regulated activities. The Committee endorsed management’s response to the discussion paper issued by the International Accounting Standards Board in September 2014 and believe that guidance should be introduced that results in the IFRS financial statements of the Company more closely reflecting its economic performance and position.

Fair, balanced and understandable. The requirement of the Code to ensure that the Annual Report and Accounts, taken as a whole, is fair, balanced and understandable in the context of the applicable accounting standards and confirmed this view to the Board.

Interim Management Statements (IMS). The Board’s decision to cease the publication of an IMS and the impact on the traditional role of the Committee. Depending on the content of future market updates, the Committee will review these prior to publication.

Cyber security risk management. A paper from internal

(corporate) audit on the status of our cyber security risk management and external good practice in September 2014. In setting the scope of its new responsibilities, the Committee considered the level of assurance currently provided by internal (corporate) audit and other assurance providers and the frequency and extent of information received. Subsequently, the Committee’s terms of reference were amended to include this additional responsibility in relation to the review of the governance processes over cyber security risk and the Committee now receives a regular update from the Head of Corporate Audit.

Risk management. Half-yearly updates on the management of key risks faced by the Company including changes to the corporate risk profile to reflect Executive Committee risk management discussions.

     50


Committee membership and attendance table

Attendance is expressed as the number of meetings attended out of the number possible or applicable for the individual Director during the year to 31 March 2015. Biographical details and experience of Committee members are set out on pages 178 and 179.

Summarised below are the issues which attracted the most focus, and time, of the Committee in relation to the financial statements during the year.

US financial controls. The Committee has continued to devote a significant amount of time challenging management on the action they are taking to continue to improve the US finance control environment. There has been continued focus on embedding the enterprise resource planning system in the US and the benefits this system now brings. The Committee has received regular updates from management on progress against the measures taken to remediate US financial control deficiencies.

In October, a new US CFO was appointed to lead the US finance team. She initiated a granular review of the US finance function to understand the current service levels and key learnings from prior initiatives, including the successes as well as initiatives that did not fully achieve their goals.

The outputs from this review were incorporated into a new US finance function initiative which is intended to address the root cause of issues identified by the review and simplify and standardise processes.

In January 2015, the Committee received a presentation on the initiative to understand the approach being taken, the stages involved and the underlying issues that the initiative was aiming to resolve. Management sought input and feedback from the Committee on the direction, focus and timing of the proposed initiative. The Committee discussed the proposal and asked questions about the initiative before approving the approach. Regular updates will be provided to the Committee through the year so that progress can be monitored.

During the year, the Committee challenged management in the US on its regulatory filing obligations, noting that due to the system implementation issues, not all filings were made on time. Management presented and, during the course of the year, delivered on a detailed plan to complete the filings and remediate the process. All regulatory filings are now up to date and management communicated with the regulators throughout the process.

Presentation of exceptional items. At the half year and year end, the Committee examined an analysis of items to be classified as exceptional to make sure the items did not include income or costs relating to the underlying business performance.

In particular, the Committee considered the treatment of the liability management programme costs at the year end. Management proposed that the costs associated with the debt redemptions should be treated as exceptional as they were one-off, significant and outside the ordinary course of business. To include this cost in underlying finance costs would otherwise distort users’ understanding of the business performance. This proposal was in line with the exceptional items accounting policy in the Annual Report and Accounts and the historical treatment of debt redemption costs.

The Committee agreed that the classification of this item was appropriate. See note 4 footnote 8 on page 104.

NameAttendance  

Mark Williamson (chairman)

8 of 8  

Paul Golby1

1 of 1  

Ruth Kelly

8 of 8  

Philip Aiken2

7 of 7  

Maria Richter3

4 of 4  

1. Paul Golby joined the Committee on 25 February 2015.

2. Philip Aiken stepped down from the Board with effect from 25 February 2015.

3. Maria Richter stepped down from the Board with effect from 28 July 2014.

Therese Esperdy was appointed to the Committee with effect from 22 April 2015.

Experience

The Board has determined that Mark:

    has recent and relevant financial experience;

    is a suitably qualified audit committee financial expert within

      the meaning of the SEC requirements; and

    is independent within the meaning of the New York Stock

      Exchange listing rules.

Financial reporting

The Committee monitors the integrity of the Company’s financial information and other formal documents relating to its financial performance and makes appropriate recommendations to the Board before publication.

An important factor in the integrity of financial statements is making sure that suitable and compliant accounting policies are adopted and applied consistently on a year-on-year basis and across the Company. In this respect, the Committee also considers the estimates and judgements made by management when accounting for non-standard transactions, including the treatment of exceptional items. Two examples of these are set out below.

These considerations are supported by input from other assurance providers such as the group controls, risk management and ethics and compliance teams, the business separation compliance officer, internal (corporate) audit and the SEH Committee, as well as our external auditors. In addition, the Committee also considers reports of the Disclosure Committee. See page 59 for more information on the role of the Disclosure Committee.

The Committee reviews and approves the external audit plan annually (see page 53) and, as part of this, considers the significant risks upon which the external auditors will focus their audit. The independent auditors’ report (pages 79 to 84) highlights areas of focus, including some of the issues that the Committee discussed during the year.

Other risks, including the accuracy and valuation of treasury derivative transactions, accounting for pension obligations, accuracy of capital expenditure, revenue recognition and valuation of environmental provisions were not considered in detail by the Committee during the year as nothing significant arose that warranted Committee attention.

LOGO

        NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/1551                    


 Corporate Governance

Corporate Governancecontinued

Accounting for agreed legal settlements. During the year, the Company reached negotiated settlement agreements in a legal case. The Company was awarded a total of £113 million (including allowance for legal costs incurred). Due to the size of the impact on the income statement, the Committee agreed with management’s decision that this was not considered to be exceptional for the year. The Committee reviewed and challenged the classification of the settlements and agreed that £56 million be recognised in the income statement in the year, with the remainder credited to property, plant and equipment. Management is waiting for confirmation from Ofgem of the regulatory treatment of these awards under RIIO.

Confidential reporting procedures and whistleblowing

The integrity of the financial statements is further supported by the confidential reporting and whistleblowing procedures we have in place. The Committee reviews these procedures once a year to make sure that complaints are treated confidentially and that a proportionate, independent investigation is carried out in all cases.

Internal (corporate) audit

The corporate audit function provides independent, objective assurance to the Audit, SEH and Executive Committees on whether our existing control and governance frameworks are operating effectively in order to meet our strategic objectives. Assurance work is conducted and managed in accordance with the Institute of Internal Auditor’s International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing and Code of Ethics.

To keep the Committee informed of trends identified from the assurance work and to update on the progress against the corporate audit plan, the Head of Corporate Audit reports to the Committee at least twice each year. These reports present information on specific audits, as appropriate, summarise common control themes arising from the work of the team and update on progress with implementing management actions. Where control issues are identified, senior leaders may be invited to attend Committee meetings to provide a commentary around the actions they are taking to improve the control environment within their area of responsibility.

In order to meet the responsibility and objectives set out in the Corporate Audit Charter, audits of varying types and scopes are performed as part of the annual corporate audit plan. The audit plan is based on a combination of risk-based and cyclical reviews, together with a small amount of work that is mandated, typically by US regulators.

Inputs to the audit plan include risk registers, corporate priorities, external research of emerging risks and trends and discussions with senior management to ensure that the plan aligns with the Committee and Company’s view of risk. The audit plan is considered and approved by the Committee annually.

External audit

The Committee is responsible for overseeing relations with the external auditors, including the approval of fees, and makes recommendations to the Board on their appointment and reappointment. Details of total remuneration to auditors for the year, including audit services, audit-related services and other non-audit services, can be found in note 3(e) of the consolidated financial statements on page 102.

Auditor independence and objectivity

The independence of the external auditors is essential to the provision of an objective opinion on the true and fair view presented in the financial statements.

Auditor independence and objectivity is safeguarded by a number of control measures, including:

limiting the nature and value of non-audit services performed by the external auditors;
ensuring that employees of the external auditors who have worked on the audit in the past two years are not appointed to senior financial positions within the Company in line with our internal code;
monitoring the changes in legislation related to auditor objectivity and independence to help ensure we remain compliant;
providing a business conduct helpline that employees can use to report any concerns, including those relating to the relationships between Company personnel and the external auditor;
the rotation of the lead engagement partner at least every five years;
PwC’s internal independence rules and processes which have been designed to exceed professional standards and focus on both personal independence and scope of services;
independent reporting lines from PwC to the Committee and the opportunity to meet with the Committee independently; and
an annual review by the Committee of the structures, policies and practices in place to make sure the external auditors’ objectivity and independence is maintained.

A new lead engagement partner will be appointed for the 2015/16 financial year following the completion of the current lead audit partner’s tenure.

        52


Non-audit services provided by the external auditors

In accordance with our policy, non-audit services provided by the external auditors above a threshold of £50,000 require approval in advance by the Committee.

Below this threshold, all requests are approved in advance by the Finance Director and do not require Committee pre-approval. This reduces the administrative burden on the Committee. A full list of all Committee and Finance Director approved non-audit work requests is presented to the Committee annually to ensure the Committee is aware of all non-audit services provided.

Additionally, the Committee receives quarterly reports from management on non-audit services and other consultants’ fees to monitor the types of services being provided and fees incurred.

Approval for the provision of non-audit services is given on the basis the service will not compromise independence and is a natural extension of the audit or if there are overriding business or efficiency reasons making the external auditors most suited to provide the service. Certain services are prohibited from being performed by the external auditors, as required under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002.

Total non-audit services provided by PwC during the year ended 31 March 2015 were £0.9 million (2014: £1.7 million), which comprised 7% (2014: 13%) of total audit and audit-related fees (see note 3(e)).

Total audit and audit-related fees include the statutory fee and fees paid to PwC for other services that the external auditors are required to perform, for example regulatory audits and Sarbanes-Oxley Act attestation. Non-audit fees represent all other services provided by PwC not included in the above.

Non-audit services provided by PwC in the year included tax compliance services in territories other than the US (£0.4 million), the significant majority of which relates to the UK.

The Committee considered that tax compliance services were most efficiently provided by the external auditors, as much of the information used in preparing computations and returns is derived from audited financial information. In order to maintain the external auditors’ independence and objectivity, management reviewed and considered PwC’s findings and PwC did not make any decisions on behalf of management.

Auditor appointment

An annual review is conducted by the Committee of the level and constitution of the external audit and non-audit fees and the effectiveness, independence and objectivity of the external auditors.

The annual review includes consideration of:

  audit quality and the external audit process globally;

  the auditors’ performance and delivery against the audit

    plan;

  the expertise of the firm and our relationship with them

    including the level of challenge; and

  the results of online questionnaires completed by the

Chairman, Committee members, Executive Directors and senior representatives from the finance team. The questions focused on: the quality of service; sufficiency of resources; planning and execution of the audit; communication and interaction; and overall satisfaction. No material issues were identified.

Following this year’s annual review, the Committee was satisfied with the effectiveness, independence and objectivity of the external auditors, and recommended to the Board their reappointment for a further year. A resolution to reappoint PwC and giving authority to the Directors to determine their remuneration will be submitted to shareholders at the 2015 AGM.

Audit tender

PwC have been the Company’s external auditors since the merger with Lattice Group plc in 2002, having been the incumbent external auditors of both the merging parties and the audit contract has not been put out to tender since then. Their performance has been reviewed annually by the Committee since that time.

The Committee discussed the implications of the Competition and Market Authority Order requiring FTSE 350 companies to hold an audit tender every 10 years as well as the final European Commission (EC) regulations, which came into EU legislation in June 2014. The Committee noted that based on the EC transitional arrangements, the final year in which PwC can be appointed as the Group’s auditors is for the year ended 31 March 2020.

At its meeting in May 2015, the Committee considered the timing of a potential tender for the external audit. The Committee considered the continued US financial controls improvement programme and the services we currently receive from other external audit firms that may be considered in a tender process. It concluded that, firstly, in order to ensure an orderly transition and secondly, to ensure compliance with the EC regulations on the provision of prohibited services, an audit tender process will be run later this year for the audit of the year ending 31 March 2018. PwC will not be invited to tender.

No representatives from PwC were present during the Committee’s discussion of the options for a tender of the external audit.

There are no contractual obligations restricting our choice of external auditors and we have not entered into any auditor liability agreement.

Audit quality

To maintain audit quality and provide comfort on the integrity of financial reporting, the Committee reviews and challenges the proposed external audit plan including the scope and materiality to make sure that PwC have identified all key risks and developed robust audit procedures and communication plans.

The Committee also considers PwC’s response to accounting, financial control and audit issues as they arise, and meets with them at least annually without management present, providing the external auditors with the opportunity to raise any matters in confidence.

LOGO

            NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/1553                                


Corporate Governance

Corporate Governancecontinued

 

Risk management and internal control

The Audit Committee monitors the effectivenessSingle total figure of the risk management and internal control processes during the year through the biannual reports it receives and reports to the Board on the outcome. The review covers all material controls, including financial, operational and compliance controls. Please see page 41 for further details about the review of effectiveness.

In support of our compliance with the New Code, reporting to the Audit Committee on risk management and internal control has been reviewed by the Board and refinements will be adopted for the financial year 2015/16.

Details of our internal control systems, including those relating to the financial reporting process, can be found on pages 38 to 41 and page 173.

Risk management

Theremuneration – Executive Committee discusses the principal risks faced by the Company and updates the corporate risk profile every six months. The approved profile is subsequently shared with the Audit Committee, along with US and UK regional risk profiles, as part of our continuous risk management process.

To continuously improve and remain at best practice levels, the risk management team reviews risk process standards, emerging trends and concepts being driven by the main consultancy firms and seeks to apply these as appropriate. The standards issued by the COSO and the international risk standard ISO 31000 continue to inform the principles of our risk management process.

During the year, we adopted the revised framework issued by the COSO for our internal controls over financial reporting. This introduced specific principles to cover fraud risk assessment and information technology. We also reviewed the procedures for the identification, assessment, mitigation and reporting of risks.

Further details of our risk management systems can be found on pages 38 to 41 and our risk factors are described in full on pages 173 to 176.

Compliance management

Compliance management has been integrated into a new Global Assurance team which incorporates ethics, risk management, licence management and records management with a view to improving visibility and reporting in all areas.

Biannual reports to the Committee focus on compliance with external legal obligations and regulatory commitments. During the year, the Committee requested that additional detail be added to the reports against each of the actual or potential non-compliance items identified to show the person responsible and provide a summary of the actions being taken to resolve the actual or potential non-compliance.

The Committee also received annual reports on the Company’s anti-bribery procedures and whistleblowing procedures and reviewed their adequacy. It noted that no material instances of non-compliance had been identified.

Going concern

Our going concern process is an extension of our business planning process, and is further supplemented by our annual budget and other liquidity risk management controls. Our five year business plan and one year budget were reviewed and approved by the Board at its meetings in November 2014 and March 2015 respectively. The Finance Committee provides ongoing oversight of our liquidity policy, which requires us to maintain sufficient liquidity for a rolling 12 month period.

Given our business model, current regulatory clarity and other factors impacting our operating environment, and the robustness of our business planning process and scenario analysis, we have concluded the going concern assessment period is the five years ending 31 March 2019, in line with our business plan. We will reassess this period annually in light of developments in our operating environment, business model and strategic priorities.

Our business plan considers the significant solvency and liquidity risks involved in delivering our business model in light of our strategic priorities. The business plan models a number of upside and downside scenarios, derived from the risks and opportunities identified, and determines the impact these would have on our results and financial position over the five year period. In addition, we have reviewed and challenged a number of worst case scenarios and their possible remediation.

Our business model calls for significant capital investment to maintain and expand our network infrastructure. To deliver this, our business plan highlights that we will need to access capital markets to raise additional funds from time to time. We have a long and successful history in this regard. Our business plan also models various KPIs used by lenders and credit rating agencies in assessing a company’s credit worthiness. These models indicate that we should continue to have access to capital markets at commercially acceptable interest rates throughout the five year period. To monitor and control risks around access to capital markets, we have policies and procedures in place to help mitigate, as far as possible, any risk of a change in our credit ratings and other credit metrics.

Having made enquiries and reviewed management’s assessment of the going concern assumption, the Directors have a reasonable expectation that the Group has adequate resources to continue in operational existence for the period of the going concern assessment. For this reason, the Directors are satisfied that, at the time of approving the financial statements, it is appropriate to continue to adopt the going concern basis in preparing the consolidated and individual financial statements of the Company.(audited information)

More detail on our financial risks, including liquidity and solvency, is provided in note 30 to the consolidated financial statements. There have been no major changes to the Group’s significant liquidity and solvency risks in the year.

The following table shows a single total figure in respect of qualifying service for 2015/16, together with comparative figures for 2014/15:
                               
    

Salary

£’000

   

Benefits in kind

£’000

   APP
£’000
   LTPP
£’000
   Pension
£’000
   Other
£’000
   

 

           Total 

           £’000                  

   

 

 

   

 

 

                    
     2015/16   2014/15     2015/16   2014/15     2015/16   2014/15    2015/16   2014/15     2015/16   2014/15     2015/16   2014/15     2015/16   2014/15

 

Andrew Bonfield

   736     727      61     58      865     854      1,345     1,271      221     218           –      3,228    3,128

Steve Holliday

   1,033     1,021      41     40      1,222     1,210      2,125     2,004      730     523           –      5,151    4,798

John Pettigrew

   503     475      14     18      503     527      406     396      143     451           –      1,569    1,867

Dean Seavers

   678     –      39     –      649     –           –      148     –      170     –      1,684    

 

Total

   2,950     2,223      155     116      3,239     2,591      3,876     3,671      1,242     1,192      170     –      11,632    9,793

 

                              

 54


Notes:

Salary: Base salaries were last increased on 1 June 2015. At this time Andrew Bonfield and Steve Holliday received salary increases of approximately 1%, in line with the salary increases given to other managerial employees of the Company in the UK. John Pettigrew was given an increase of 7% to move closer towards market as Executive Director, UK in 2015/16. Dean Seavers joined the Board on 1 April 2015 and was not given a salary increase at 1 June 2015, in line with other managerial employees of the Company in the US. Dean Seavers’ base salary has been converted at $1.4744:£1 for 2015/16.

Benefits in kind: Benefits in kind include private medical insurance, life assurance, and for UK Executive Directors, either a fully expensed car or a cash alternative to a car and the use of a driver when required. For Andrew Bonfield, it also includes the benefits of Sharesave options granted during the year. For Dean Seavers, this amount includes relocation payments.

Other:For Dean Seavers, Other includes the second $250,000 cash payment for forfeited bonuses from his former employer.

LTPP: A portion of the 2012 LTPP award vested in July 2015, and the remainder is due to vest in July 2016. The above value for 2015/16 is based on the share price (818 pence) on the vesting date (1 July 2015) for that portion that vested on 1 July 2015, and the average share price over the three months from 1 January 2016 to 31 March 2016 (958 pence) for that portion due to vest on 1 July 2016. The 2014/15 LTPP amount has been restated to reflect the actual amounts vested on 1 July 2015 for RoE, rather than the estimate shown in last year’s Annual Report. Due to a lower share price at vesting of 818 pence ($64.17 per ADS) versus the estimate of 899 pence ($70.33 per ADS), the actual value at vesting was £29,358, £46,335, and £12,441 lower than the estimate for Andrew Bonfield, Steve Holliday and John Pettigrew respectively.

 

 

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16
 Annual report on remuneration 75


Corporate Governancecontinued

Annual report on remunerationcontinued

Performance against targets for APP 2015/16 (audited information)

APP awards are earned by reference to the financial year and paid in June. Fifty percent of awards are paid in shares which (after any sales to pay tax) must be retained until the shareholding requirement is met, and in any event for two years after receipt. In relation to both the financial measures and individual objectives, threshold, target and stretch performance levels are pre-determined and pay out at 0%, 50% and 100% respectively and on a straight-line basis in between threshold and target performance and target and stretch performance. Individual objectives of the Executive Directors reflect the primary focus areas within the Company’s overall strategic priorities:

 building on our strong safety performance;
 

Finance Committee

Matters considered

LOGO

Role

Sets policy and grants authoritythe drive for financing decisions, credit exposure, hedging and foreign exchange transactions, guarantees and indemnities subject to the risk appetite approved by the Board. It also approves other treasury, tax, pension funding and insurance strategies and, if appropriate, recommends these to the Board.

Review of the year

My first eight months as chairman have been busy but enjoyable. In July, we said goodbye to Maria Richter who stepped down from the Board. I would like to thank her for her contribution to the Committee and for her guidance and support during the handover period.

As part of my induction to the Board and before taking over as chairman of the Committee, I met employees involved in the work of the Committee from finance, treasury, tax, pensions and insurancebusiness growth in the UK and US. I also had several opportunitiesUS;

delivery of operational excellence and improvement in overall Company performance and service to meetcustomers;
promotion of innovative ideas to work more efficiently and effectively;
strengthening the wider UKtalent pipeline and US tax, insurancekeeping all our employees fully engaged; and treasury teams which has furthered my understanding of
working with external stakeholders to shape energy policy and embed sustainability into our treasury operations.

This year, we continueddecision-making to preserve natural resources and focus on funding plans to take into account international debt market conditions. The Committee reviewed and agreed a liability management programme which resulted in the repurchase of £0.9 billion of bonds.

The Committee also received regular updates on negotiations in relation to the European Investment Bank (EIB) loan before agreeing the £1.5 billion loan agreement with the EIB in November 2014.

We also considered the financial headroom policy. During the financial crisis, the Committee approved a policy to hold 12 months of liquidity and a minimum sum as cash or liquid assets. The Committee noted that the Group’s liquidity was monitored on a regular basis both internally and externally and took into consideration the sources of liquidity. In light of the improved access to liquidity the Committee approved a simplification of the policy.

External advisors have presented to the Committee throughout the year, including a credit rating agency on their methodology and an update from insurance brokers on the global property insurance market, including the current trading environment, market selection, new risks, client trends and the future outlook for insurance.

For the year ahead, we will focus on our funding needs, liquidity management, alternative sources of funding and pensions investment strategy.

Examples of matters the Committee considered during the year include:

    funding requirements and financing for the

      business plan;

    setting and reviewing treasury policies;

    treasury performance updates provided at each

      meeting;

    UK and US tax updates;

    US energy procurement activities;

    annual update on the electricity and gas trading

      activities in the UK;

    credit rating agencies’ view on the Company;

    foreign exchange policy;

    interest rate risk management;

    the draft going concern statement for the half

      and full-year results prior to consideration by the

      Audit Committee and Board;

    pensions updates, including funding of the

      Company’s pension deficits; and

    insurance renewal strategy.

Committee membership and attendance

Attendance is expressed as the number of meetings attended out of the number possible or applicable for the individual Director during the year to 31 March 2015.

NameAttendance  

Therese Esperdy¹ (chairman)

4 of 4  

Steve Holliday

4 of 4  

Andrew Bonfield

4 of 4  

Jonathan Dawson

4 of 4  

Ruth Kelly

4 of 4  

Maria Richter²

2 of 2  

1.  Chairman from 28 July 2014.

2.  Maria Richter stepped down from the Board with effect from 28 July

     2014.

The Committee in action

Evaluation of Committee performance

The Committee performance evaluation process this year was an upward facing process undertaken by non-Committee members and regular attendees/presenters. This was in line with the process adopted by the other committees (except the Nominations Committee).

The Committee concluded that it had operated effectively throughout the year and agreed an action plan for 2015/16 to further improve performance.

An update on the evaluation including the draft Committee action plan was reported to the Board in May 2015. Progress against the action plan will be monitored through the year by the Committee and the Board.

environmental issues.

The outcomes of APP awards earned in 2015/16, along with detail of individual objectives, are shown in the figures below:

   Proportion
of max
opportunity
  Threshold  Target  Stretch  Actual  

Proportion
of max

achieved

 

Adjusted EPS (p/share)

  35%    56.2    59.2    62.2    62.3    100%  

 

Group RoE (%)

   11.2    11.6    12.0    12.0    100%  

��

UK RoE (%)

  35%     13.25     13.3    55%  

 

US RoE (%)

    8.25     8.25    50%  

 

Individual objectives

  30%            See adjacent table    80–86%  

Notes:

Overall: Group RoE pertains to the CEO and Finance Director, whilst UK RoE and US RoE pertain to the Executive Director, UK and Executive Director, US, respectively. RoE in some form comprises 35% of the total maximum APP opportunity.

Adjusted EPS: Adjusted EPS actual is reduced by 1.2 pence to account for the impact of timing, absence of a budgeted rise in the UK corporate tax rate, and the impact of scrip dividend uptake and currency adjustments.

Group RoE: Group RoE actual is reduced by 30 basis points to account for the absence of a budgeted rise in the UK corporate tax rate.

US RoE: US RoE actual is adjusted to capture half of the realised gains achieved from the exchange of National Grid USA’s share in the Iroquois pipeline joint venture.

LOGO

   Andrew  Steve  John  Dean 
    Bonfield  Holliday  Pettigrew  Seavers 

Safety

        ● 

Group strategy

        

Financial strategy

        

Business growth

        ● 

Operational excellence

        ● 

Customer experience

        ● 

Employee engagement

        ● 

Capability development

        ● 

Stakeholder relations

         ● 
Proportion of maximum achieved  80%  82%  86%  80% 
 

 

        NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/1555                                


Corporate Governance

Corporate Governancecontinued

2015/16 APP as proportion of base salary

LOGO

2015/16 LTPP performance (audited information)

The LTPP value included in the 2015/16 single total figure relates to vesting of the conditional LTPP award granted in 2012. The 2012 award is determined based on differing performance periods and vesting dates:

 

 

performance over the three years ending 31 March 2015 for the EPS measure (50% weighting), which vested on 1 July 2015;
 performance over the three years ending 30 June 2015 for the TSR measure (25% weighting), which vested on 1 July 2015; and
 

Safety, Environment and Health Committee

Matters considered

LOGO

Role

The Committee reviewsperformance over the strategies, policies, initiatives, risk exposure, targets and performance of the Company and, where appropriate, of its suppliers and contractors in relation to safety, environment and health. It monitors the resources we use for compliance and driving improvement in these areas and reviews investigations into major incidents.

Review of the year

Following Philip Aiken’s departure from the Board at the end of February, I have taken over as chairman of the Committee. I have been a member of the Committeefour years ending 31 March 2016 for the last three yearsUK RoE measure and over this time we have seen the Company make significant progress in process safety management and the safety performance of both the UK and US businesses, with31 December 2015 for the US closing the gapRoE measure (25% weighting overall, split by Executive Director as shown overleaf), which will vest on the UK in terms of employee and contractor LTIs. I hope to see further progress in these areas going forwards.

We welcomed Andrew Bonfield to the Committee at the beginning of the year. Andrew is a member of the Chief Financial Officers Leader Group of the Accounting for Sustainability (A4S) project, which challenges organisations to demonstrate the commercial rationale for incorporating sustainability into decision making and to manage the related risks and opportunities. He also chairs the Company’s Engineering Assurance Committee, which now reports on a six monthly basis to the Committee.

We have continued to focus on process safety and establishing a safety management system across both our UK and US businesses. We have spent time looking at the risks relating to our US LNG assets and the measures being introduced to address these (see ‘The Committee in action’ below).

Following a fatality involving a contractor at our Rhode Island gas distribution business, we spent time with senior local management considering the causes of the incident and how best to ensure that safety procedures are understood and complied with at all times, by both employees and contractors.

In terms of environmental matters, we have continued to monitor our strategy and approach to sustainability. In particular, we have looked at how we are working with governments and bodies such as the US Environmental Protection Agency to influence regulations that directly impact on our business.

We also considered the Health and Wellbeing strategy and the work being done on data management, improved line management training and providing support and guidance to employees to address levels of absenteeism.

Examples of matters the SEH Committee reviewed during the year include:

    ongoing monitoring of safety performance and

      significant incidents in both the US and the UK;

    lessons learnt and steps taken following a

      fatality of a member of the public in the UK in

      April 2014 and a contractor fatality in the US in

      November 2014;

    in-depth reviews of incidents in both the UK

      and US gas businesses where failure to follow

      due process led to high pressure releases

      placing the employees involved in potential

      danger;

    compliance with US gas pipeline safety

      regulations in the light of new regulations and

      evolving enforcement policies by our

      regulators;

    review of the role and set up of the Engineering

      Assurance Committee which was formed last

      year to promote the application of common,

      consistent, engineering assurance

      methodologies across the Company;

    conclusion of a review of the interfaces

      between our IT systems and safety processes;

    the use of bars in the UK gas distribution

      business for the break up and removal of gas

      mains below 6” in diameter, looking at safety

      issues and available alternatives; and

    climate change strategy, including performance

      against emissions targets and carbon budgets.

Committee membership and attendance

Attendance is expressed as the number of meetings attended out of the number possible or applicable for the individual Director during the year to 31 March 2015.

NameAttendance  

Paul Golby (chairman)1

5 of 5  

Andrew Bonfield

4 of 5  

Nora Mead Brownell

5 of 5  

Philip Aiken2

5 of 5  

1.  Chairman from 25 February 2015.

2.  Philip Aiken stepped down from the Board with effect from

     25 February 2015.

The Committee in action

US LNG assets

As part of its focus on process safety and the management of major hazard assets, the Committee has spent time with the US business looking at the risks surrounding its LNG assets, as a number of these assets are located close to areas that have pockets of relatively dense population.

The Committee considered the possible risk reduction measures for two key sites, Commercial Point in Massachusetts and Providence in Rhode Island, where the risk levels had been established to be highest. Philip Aiken visited both sites and members of the Committee received additional training on LNG process safety risks and the relevant risk assessment methodologies.

Over the following 12 months the Committee, through regular reports, oversaw the implementation of the measures proposed, including the installation of automatic shutdown mechanisms which was completed at these plants in June 2014. The Committee also reviewed the proposed timetable for dike redesign and construction to improve containment of LNG escapes in the event of an incident and recommended completion be brought forward by several months.

 July 2016.

       56


 

76National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Corporate Governance


Nominations Committee

Matters considered

LOGO

Examples of matters the Nominations Committee considered during the year include:
 

 

   Corporate Governance    Director appointments and leavers, see page 58 for

      details of the Executive Director appointment

      process;

 

    Board and committee membership following

      changes to the composition of the Board;

    the executive succession planning focusing on the

      identification, development and readiness of

      successors to the Executive Committee in particular;

Role

Responsible for considering the structure, size and composition of the Board and committees, and succession planning. It also identifies and proposes individuals to be Directors and executive management reporting directly to the Chief Executive, and establishes the criteria for any new position.

    review of Sir Peter’s performance as Chairman, led

      by Mark Williamson, the SID;

    the proposed structure for the UK business;

    feedback on the key issues to be covered by the

      talent update paper to the Board to provide focus for

      the discussion; and

    the Committee’s performance; see ‘The Committee

      in action’ below.

Review of the year

Succession planning continues to be an important responsibility of this Committee, and is reflected in the time spent on the topic this year. The process of building a strong and effective Board requires a good balance of continuity and refreshment.

As described in my foreword to the Corporate Governance report, during the year we have undertaken a rigorous recruitment process to select Dean Seavers as a successor to Tom King, a key appointment to the Board. Details of our process are included later in this report on page 58.

Balance is an important consideration in recruitment, not only in terms of the number of Executive and Non-executive Directors, but also in terms of the range of expertise and backgrounds. In setting the specification of the role, we reviewed the existing skills, experience and diversity of the Board, including diversity of thinking styles, and identified areas that were essential or highly desirable in potential candidates.

The fit with current membership and how the individuals combine to add value was also taken in to account in the decision making process. Dean brings valuable skills and experience that complement the existing Board members and provides a fresh perspective and challenge to Board discussions.

Last year we set out eight measurable objectives to support our Board diversity policy. We have conducted our annual review of the policy and I am pleased to report that we are on track against the objectives we set.

We currently have 27.3% women on our Board and 24.1% in our senior management population. We have included examples of how the Company supports women throughout our businesses on page 25.

Following the changes in Board membership, the composition of the committees was also reviewed. Paul Golby has become chairman of the SEH Committee and joined the Audit Committee as a member in place of Philip Aiken to maintain continuity between the two committees.

The Committee also considers succession planning over the long-term, for both Executive and Non-executive positions, to ensure that we have the right mix of skills and experience as the Company evolves and so that change can be effectively managed.

Committee membership and attendance

Attendance is expressed as the number of meetings attended out of the number possible or applicable for the individual Director during the year to 31 March 2015.

NameAttendance  

Sir Peter Gershon (chairman)

5 of 5  

Nora Mead Brownell

5 of 5  

Jonathan Dawson

5 of 5  

Therese Esperdy

5 of 5  

Paul Golby

5 of 5  

Ruth Kelly

5 of 5  

Mark Williamson

5 of 5  

Philip Aiken1

4 of 4  

Maria Richter2

1 of 1  

1.  Philip Aiken stepped down from the Board with effect from 25 February 2015.

2.  Maria Richter stepped down from the Board with effect from 28 July 2014.

The Committee in action

Evaluation of Committee performance

The Nominations Committee performance evaluation process took a slightly different approach to the evaluations for the Board and other committees. Committee members were asked to provide feedback on how effectively it had dealt with the main topics considered in the last year and its duties and responsibilities; how it had worked together as a unit; and the strengths and weaknesses of the Committee and how these could be addressed by the action plan.

Following consideration of the Committee’s performance over the year and the above questions, the Committee concluded that it had operated effectively throughout the year and agreed an action plan for 2015/16, which included refinements to the appointment process of future non-executive and executive directors to make sure that we continuously improve our robust approach, including briefings for Non-executive Directors on their role in the selection and appointment of executive directors.

Additionally, the time spent discussing senior executive succession planning will be reviewed to make sure that Committee input continues to be provided, as appropriate, to support senior appointments.

An update on the evaluation including the draft Committee action plan was reported to the Board in May 2015.

LOGO

        NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/1557                                


          Corporate Governance

     Corporate Governancecontinued

 

    

The performance achieved against the targets, including the expected vesting percentage for the RoE measures, was:

 

Performance measureThreshold – 25% vestingMaximum – 100% vestingActual/expected vesting  

Appointment processActual/expected  

Executive Directorproportion of  

The recruitment process undertaken for the appointment of Dean Seavers was formal, rigorous and transparent. The Nominations Committee appointed Korn Ferry as the search consultancy, and the following process was undertaken:

   with input from the Committee members, a role and

     person specification was prepared;

   Korn Ferry conducted initial searches, meeting eight

     potential candidates and shortlisted three candidates;

   a series of interviews of the shortlisted candidates were

     conducted by Sir Peter Gershon, Steve Holliday,

     Andrew Bonfield, Mark Williamson, Nora Mead Brownell

     and Mike Westcott (the Group Human Resources

     Director);

   following a review of the combined ratings from all the

     interviewers, the Nominations Committee selected two

     candidates for further consideration;

   final interviews with the two candidates were carried out

     by Steve Holliday, Nick Winser, John Pettigrew, Nora

     Mead Brownell and members of the Executive

     Committee;

   following discussion, the Nominations Committee

     recommended Dean Seavers as its preferred candidate

     for appointment to the Board, noting that all members

     had met Dean; and

   the Board approved the appointment as recommended.

In addition to providing external search consultancy services to the Company, Korn Ferry also provided IT consultancy,e-learning services and coaching for senior management.

John Pettigrew was appointed to the Board with effect from 1 April 2014. A description of the process undertaken in relation to his appointment was provided in the 2013/14 Annual Report and Accounts.

Board diversity and the Davies Review

At National Grid, we believe that creating an inclusive and diverse culture supports the attraction and retention of talented people, improves effectiveness, delivers superior performance and enhances the success of the Company.

Our Board diversity policy promotes this and reaffirms our aspiration to meet and exceed the target of 25% of Board positions being held by women by 2015, as set out by Lord Davies.

We currently have 27% women on our Board and 22% women on our Executive Committee. The number of women in senior management positions and throughout the organisation is set out on page 25 along with examples of the initiatives to promote and support inclusion and diversity throughout our Company.

During the year, the Committee reviewed the Board diversity policy and progress made against the objectives which were approved to support the implementation of the policy as set out below:

The Board aspires to exceed the target of 25% of Board positions to be held by women by 2015.

Objective met – we currently have 27% women on our Board.

All Board appointments will be made on merit, in the context of the skills and experience that are needed for the Board to be effective.

Objective met – John Pettigrew and Dean Seavers were appointed on merit.

We will only engage executive search firms who have signed up to the Voluntary Code of Conduct on gender diversity.

Objective met – Korn Ferry are signed up to the code.

Where appropriate, we will assist with the development and support of initiatives that promote gender and other forms of diversity among our Board, executive and other senior management.

Objective met – see page 25 for further details.

Where appropriate, we will continue to adopt best practice in response to the Davies Review.

Ongoing – as appropriate.

We will review our progress against the Board diversity policy annually.

Objective met – ongoing.

We will report on our progress against the policy and our objectives in the Annual Report and Accounts along with details of initiatives to promote gender and other forms of diversity among our Board, Executive Committee and other senior management.

Objective met – ongoing.

We will continue to make key diversity data, both about the Board and our wider employee population, available in the Annual Report and Accounts.

Objective met – ongoing.

Progress against the objectives and the policy will continue to be reviewed annually and reported in the Annual Report and Accounts.

Executive Committee

Led by the Chief Executive, the Executive Committee oversees the safety, operational and financial performance of the Company. It is responsible for making day-to-day management and operational decisions it considers necessary to safeguard the interests of the Company and to further the strategy, business objectives and targets established by the Board.

It approves expenditure and other financial commitments within its authority levels and discusses, formulates and approves proposals to be considered by the Board.maximum achieved  

TSR ranking (25% weighting)

  

 

The Committee in action

During the year, the Executive Committee reviewed and discussed a proposed joint venture with the Berkeley Group. The strategic aim was to unlock value in our surplus London property portfolio and transform redundant land to help meet the current housing and commercial needs of London.

The proposal was initially presented to the Committee for consideration. Feedback was provided, with requests for further information and clarification on aspectsRanked at median of the proposal. Committee members then worked closely with management and specialist teams to develop the proposal.comparator group (FTSE 100)

The proposal returned to the Committee for review and was approved for recommendation to the Board. Following presentation and review at its November meeting, the Board gave final approval of the arrangement. The joint venture, called St William Homes, was formally announced in November.

  

 

The nine Committee members have a broad range of skills and expertise, which are updated through training and development. Some members also hold externalnon-executive directorships, giving them valuable board experience.7.5 percentage points or more above median

 

The Committee officially met 12 times this year, but2.99 percentage points above median

55.0%  

Adjusted EPS (50% weighting)

EPS growth exceeds RPI increase by 3 percentage points

EPS growth exceeds RPI increase by 8 percentage points or more

Exceeded RPI increase by 6.3 percentage points

74.4%  

UK RoE (12.5% weighting for the members interact muchCEO and Finance Director; 25% weighting for the Executive Director, UK)

RoE is equal to the average allowed regulatory return

RoE is 2 percentage points or more regularly. Those members ofabove the Committee who are not Directors regularly attend Boardaverage allowed regulatory return

Exceeded average allowed regulatory return by 3.2 percentage points

100.0%  

US RoE (12.5% weighting for the CEO and committee meetingsFinance Director; 25% weighting for specific agenda items. This means that knowledgethe former Executive Director, US)

RoE is shared and every member1 percentage point below the average allowed regulatory return

RoE is kept up to date with business activities and developments.1 percentage point or more above the average allowed regulatory return

1.1 percentage points below the average allowed regulatory return

0%  

The amounts vesting under the 2012 LTPP during the year and included in the 2015/16 single total figure are shown in the table below.

     58


The valuation is based on the following share prices:

 

818 pence ($64.17 per ADS) on the vesting date of 1 July 2015 for the EPS and TSR elements of the award; and
average share price over the three months from 1 January 2016 to 31 March 2016 of 958 pence ($69.23 per ADS) for the RoE element of the award.

 

    Original number
of share awards
in 2012 LTPP
   Overall vesting
percentage (including
expected vesting
percentage for RoE
measure)
  

Number of awards
vesting (including
expected

vesting for RoE
measure)

   

Dividend

equivalent

shares

   

Total value of awards
vesting (including
expected vesting for RoE
measure) and  dividend
equivalent shares

(£’000)

 

 

Andrew Bonfield

   213,095     63.45%    135,203     23,787     1,345  

 

Steve Holliday

   336,702     63.45%    213,628     37,586     2,125  

 

John Pettigrew

   52,395     75.95%    39,793     7,136     406  

 

Dean Seavers

                        

Last year’s Directors’ Remuneration Report covering remuneration for 2014/15 included an estimated vesting of the US and UK RoE portions of the 2011 LTPP award. These awards vested on 1 July 2015 and the performance achieved against the performance targets was the same as the expected vesting disclosed in the 2014/15 report. As a result of the actual achievement against the performance targets being the same as estimated, the vesting percentage and number of awards vesting are the same as disclosed in the 2014/15 report. However, the actual number of dividend equivalent shares varied as did the total value of awards vesting due to share price changes between the estimate and the actual date of vesting of the RoE portion. Specifically, the actual price on 1 July 2015 was 818 pence ($64.17 per ADS) rather than the estimate of 899 pence ($70.33 per ADS) disclosed in the 2014/15 report based on the average price from 1 January 2015 to 31 March 2015. As a result, the actual numbers of dividend equivalent shares granted for the 2011 LTPP were 22,454, 35,440 and 7,261 and the actual values of the awards at vesting were £29,358, £46,335 and £12,441 lower than originally estimated for Andrew Bonfield, Steve Holliday and John Pettigrew respectively.

Total pension benefits (audited information)

The table below provides details of the Executive Directors’ pension benefits. Steve Holliday and John Pettigrew participate in a Defined Benefit pension plan, whilst Andrew Bonfield receives cash in lieu of participation in a pension plan, and Dean Seavers participates in a Defined Contribution arrangement. The UK-based Executive Directors in a Defined Benefit pension participate in a salary sacrifice arrangement (FPS), under which the individual’s salary is reduced by an amount equal to the employee pension contribution that would have been paid into the scheme. An equivalent contribution is paid into the scheme by the employer. There are no additional benefits in the event of early retirement.

    Total
contributions
to DC
arrangement
£’000
   Cash in lieu of
pension
contributions
£’000
   Accrued
DB pension
at 31 March 2016
£’000 pa
   Increase
in accrued
DB pension
over year
£’000 pa
   

Reduction
in salary
due to FPS

£’000

   

Increase/
(decrease) in
any lump sum

£’000

   

Value of

pension benefit
calculated using
BIS methodology

£’000

   

Normal
retirement

date

 

 

Andrew Bonfield

        221                         221     17/08/2027  

 

Steve Holliday

             591     39     62     2     730     26/10/2016  

 

John Pettigrew

             151     7     29     23     143     26/10/2031  

 

Dean Seavers

   148                              148     30/08/2025  

Notes:

Steve Holliday: In addition to the accrued DB pension at 31 March 2016 above, there is an accrued lump sum entitlement of £129,000 as at 31 March 2016. The increase to the accumulated lump sum, net of inflation, was £2,000 in the year to 31 March 2016. The increase in accrued DB pension over the year shown above is net of inflation, as UK pensions in payment or deferment increase in line with inflation.

John Pettigrew: In addition to the accrued DB pension at 31 March 2016 above, there is an accrued lump sum entitlement of £452,000 as at 31 March 2016. The increase to the accumulated lump sum, net of inflation, was £23,000 in the year to 31 March 2016. The increase in accrued DB pension over the year shown above is net of inflation, as UK pensions in payment or deferment increase in line with inflation.

Dean Seavers: The average exchange rate for 2015/16 was $1.4744:£1. Through his participation in the 401(k) plan in the US (a DC arrangement) the Company made contributions worth £27,400. The Company also made contributions worth £121,049 to the Non-Qualified Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan which pays the portion of core contributions that cannot be paid under the qualified plan due to IRS limitations. The plan also provides a supplemental top-up benefit through additional company contributions to yield an overall company contribution of 9% of pensionable pay, including both the qualified and non-qualified plan benefits. The retirement date shown is the typical retirement age in the US. The 401(k) plan does not have a retirement age. Benefits can be taken without penalty on leaving the Company from age 55 (subject to vesting requirements) or can be rolled over into another qualifying plan.

BIS calculation: In accordance with BIS methodology, the pension benefit for Andrew Bonfield and Dean Seavers is calculated as the aggregate of contributions made to a DC arrangement and cash in lieu of pension contributions. Also in accordance with BIS methodology, the pension benefit for Steve Holliday and John Pettigrew is calculated as the increase in accrued DB pension over the year shown above multiplied by 20 plus the increase in the lump sum shown above, less the reduction in salary due to FPS. Each element is calculated separately and rounded to produce the numbers in the table above.

 

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Annual report on remuneration77


Corporate Governancecontinued

Annual report on remunerationcontinued

Single total figure of remuneration – Non-executive Directors (audited information)

The following table shows a single total figure in respect of qualifying service for 2015/16, together with comparative figures for 2014/15:

   

Fees

£’000

  

Other emoluments

£’000

  

Total

£’000

 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
                   2015/16         2014/15                   2015/16       2014/15                   2015/16         2014/15   

 

 

  Nora Mead Brownell

   94       91            –     94       91    

  Jonathan Dawson

   99       96            –     99       96    

  Therese Esperdy

   128       91            –     128       91    

  Sir Peter Gershon

   494       488     15       16     509       504    

  Paul Golby

   103       81            –     103       81    

  Ruth Kelly

   82       79            –     82       79    

  Mark Williamson

   121       118            –     121       118    

 

 

  Total

   1,121       1,044     15       16     1,136       1,060    

 

 

Therese Esperdy: Fees for 2015/16 include £22,917 in fees for serving on the National Grid USA Board.

Sir Peter Gershon: Other emoluments comprise private medical insurance, cash in lieu of a car and the use of a driver when required.

In accordance with the Company’s expenses policies, Non-executive Directors receive reimbursement for their reasonable expenses for attending Board meetings. In instances where those costs are treated by HMRC as taxable benefits, the Company also meets the associated tax cost to the Non-executive Directors through a PAYE settlement agreement with HMRC.

The total emoluments paid to Executive and Non-executive Directors in the year was £13 million (2014/15: £15 million).

LTPP (conditional award) granted during the financial year (audited information)

The face value of the awards is calculated using the volume-average weighted share price at the date of grant (25 June 2015) (£8.5147 per share and $66.9618 per ADS).

LTPP  Basis of award     Face value ’000     Proportion vesting at
threshold performance
     Number of shares     Performance  
period end date  
 

 

 

Andrew Bonfield

   300% of salary       £2,211       20%       259,668       June 2018    

Steve Holliday

   350% of salary       £3,622       20%       425,440       June 2018    

John Pettigrew

   300% of salary       £1,525       20%       179,072       June 2018    

Dean Seavers

   300% of salary       $3,000       20%       44,801 (ADSs)       June 2018    

 

 

Performance conditions for LTPP awards granted during the financial year (audited information)

   Weighting   Conditional share awards granted – 2015 
Performance measure          Andrew Bonfield       Steve Holliday     John Pettigrew     Dean Seavers    Threshold – 20% vesting   Maximum – 100% vesting   

 

 

Group RoE

   50%     50%     25%     25%      11.0%     12.5% or more    

UK RoE

       25%       
 
 
1 percentage point
above the average
allowed regulatory return
  
  
  
   
 
 
3.5 percentage points or  
more above the average  
allowed regulatory return  
  
  
  

 

US RoE

        

 

 

 

25% 

 

  

  

 

 
 

 

90% of the average
allowed regulatory return

 

  
  

  

 

 
 
 

 

105% or more of the  
average allowed  
regulatory return  

 

  
  
  

 

Value growth

  

 

 

 

50%

 

  

  

 

 

 

50%

 

  

  

 

 

 

50%

 

  

  

 

 

 

50% 

 

  

  

 

 

 

10.0%

 

  

  

 

 

 

12.0% or more  

 

  

 

 

Payments for loss of office (audited information)

There were no payments made for loss of office during 2015/16.

Payments to past Directors (audited information)

Nick Winser stepped down from the Board at the 2014 AGM and left the Company on 31 July 2015. Tom King stepped down from the Board and left the Company on 31 March 2015. Mr Winser and Mr King held awards over shares and ADSs, respectively, which were pro-rated according to their departure date. The vesting of all these awards will occur at the normal vesting dates subject to satisfaction of their specified performance conditions at that time. Portions of these awards vested on 1 July 2015 and pertain to the RoE portion of the 2011 LTPP and the TSR and EPS portions of the 2012 LTPP.

   Pro-rated number of
share awards in 2011
(RoE portion) and 2012 LTPP
   Overall vesting percentage   Number of awards vesting   Dividend equivalent
shares
   Total value of awards  
vesting and dividend  
equivalent shares  
(£’000)  
 

 

 

Tom King

   44,846 (ADSs)     56.12%     25,168 (ADSs)     4,063 (ADSs)     1,202    

 

Nick Winser

  

 

 

 

166,305

 

  

  

 

 

 

76.37%

 

  

  

 

 

 

127,000

 

  

  

 

 

 

24,035

 

  

  

 

 

 

1,235  

 

  

 

 

Shareholder dilution

Where shares may be issued or treasury shares reissued to satisfy incentives, the aggregate dilution resulting from executive share-based incentives will not exceed 5% in any 10-year period. Dilution resulting from all incentives, including all-employee incentives, will not exceed 10% in any 10-year period. The Committee reviews dilution against these limits regularly and under these limits the Company, as at 31 March 2016, had headroom of 4.01% and 7.98% respectively.

78National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Corporate Governance


 

LOGO

   Corporate Governance

 

Statement of Directors’ shareholdings and share interests (audited information)

The Executive Directors are required to build up and hold a shareholding from vested share plan awards. Deferred share plan awards are not taken into account for these purposes until the end of the deferral period. Shares are valued for these purposes at the 31 March 2016 price, which was 987 pence per share ($71.42 per ADS).

The following table shows how each Executive Director complies with the shareholding requirement and also the number of shares owned by the Non-executive Directors, including connected persons, as Non-executive Directors do not have a shareholding requirement.

The shareholding is as at 31 March 2016 and the salary used to calculate the value of shareholding is the gross annual salary as at 31 March 2016:

The normal vesting dates for the conditional share awards subject to performance conditions are 1 July 2016; 1 July 2016 and 1 July 2017; 1 July 2017; and 1 July 2018 for the LTPP 2012, LTPP 2013, LTPP 2014 and LTPP 2015 respectively.
The normal vesting dates for the conditional share awards subject to continuous employment are 13 June 2016 and 17 June 2017 for the DSP 2013 and DSP 2014 respectively.
In each of April and May 2016 a further 15 shares were purchased on behalf of Andrew Bonfield, Steve Holliday Committee chairman

2 and John Pettigrew via the Share Incentive Plan (an HMRC approved all-employee share plan), thereby increasing their beneficial interests. There have been no other changes in Directors’ shareholdings between 1 April 2016 and 18 May 2016.

Both Andrew Bonfield Finance Director

3    Stephanie Hazell, Group Strategy & Corporate

      Development Director

4    Alison Kay, Group General Counsel & Company

      Secretary (see page 179 for her biography)

5    David Lister, Chief Information Officer

6    George Mayhew, Group Corporate Affairs Director

7 and Steve Holliday have met their shareholding requirement of 400% and 500% of base salary, respectively. As both John Pettigrew Executive Director, UK

8 and Dean Seavers Executive Director, US (joined the

      Committee on 1 April 2015 to replace Tom King)

9    Mike Westcott, Group Human Resources Director

Membership stated as at 1 April 2015.

Management committees

To help make sure we allocate time and expertise were relatively new in the right way, the Company has a number of management committees, which include the Disclosure Committee, Global Ethics and Compliance Committees and the Global Retirement Plan Committee. These management committees provide reports, where relevant, to the appointing committee in line with our governance framework on the responsibilitiespost, they have been delegated.

not yet met their requirements and will not be allowed to sell shares other than to pay tax on receipt of vested shares or in exceptional circumstances until this requirement is met.

 

Directors Share ownership
requirements
(multiple of salary)
     Number of shares
owned outright
(including connected
persons)
     Number of shares
held as a multiple
of current salary
     Number of options
granted under the
Sharesave Plan
     Conditional share
awards subject to
performance
conditions (LTPP 2012,
2013, 2014 and 2015)
     Conditional share  
awards subject to  
continuous  
employment (DSP 2013  
and 2014)  
 

 

 

 

Executive Directors

                     

 

Andrew Bonfield

  400%       317,711       426%       6,651       756,209       92,754    

 

Steve Holliday

  500%       1,306,289       1,246%       3,542       1,224,546       126,771    

 

John Pettigrew

  400%       198,749       386%       4,286       417,251       28,691    

 

Dean Seavers (ADSs)

  400%       1,225       9%              85,767       –    

 

Non-executive Directors

                     

 

Nora Mead Brownell (ADSs)

         5,000       n/a                     –    

 

Jonathan Dawson

         36,586       n/a                     –    

 

Therese Esperdy (ADSs)

         1,600       n/a                     –    

 

Disclosure Committee

The role of the Disclosure Committee is to assist the Chief Executive and the Finance Director in fulfilling their responsibility for overseeing the accuracy and timeliness of the disclosures made – whether in connection with our presentations to analysts, financial reporting obligations, or other material stock exchange announcements, including the disclosure of price sensitive information.

 

This year the Committee met to consider the announcements of the fullfull- and half yearhalf-year results and the July 2014 Interim Management Statement (IMS) and reported on therelevant matters arising to the Audit Committee. In doing so it spent time considering the Company’s disclosure obligations relating to identified weaknesses in internal controls over financial reporting in the US, and whether these should be considered material forannouncement of the Company as a whole,proposed UK Gas Distribution sale process and the process for the publication of unaudited year-end financial results.

The Committee also considered the Company’s disclosure obligations relating to delays in cable manufacturing and the consequentialexpected impact on capital expenditure for the West Coast HVDC Link as well as the accounting treatment and disclosure for agreed legal settlements.

Following the removal of the requirement to publish an IMS, the Committee will review the investor newsletters prior to publication to the extent they contain updated technical guidancethis would have on the Company’s performance or otherprice-sensitive information.growth rate.

The Committee also reports the results of its evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls to the Audit Committee.

 

The Committee is chaired by the Finance Director and its members are the Group General Counsel & Company Secretary, the Global Tax and Treasury Director, the GroupGlobal Financial Controller, the Director of Investor Relations, the Head of Corporate Audit and the Deputy Group General Counsel, with other attendees as appropriate.

LOGO

Index to Directors’ Report and other

  disclosures (starting on page indicated)

  

 

AGMThe Committee in action – rate case filings page 48

During the year, the Committee reviewed and discussed our proposed rate case filings for both Massachusetts electricity operations (MECO) and our downstate New York gas companies (KEDNY/KEDLI). These filings aim to increase our allowed revenue in line with increased operating costs since base rates were reset after the last full rate review for each company (2010 for MECO, 2008 for KEDNY/KEDLI) and also to fund future investment needed to meet our customers’ requirements and improve reliability.

A key focus of the Committee discussions was on understanding the impact of the requested rate increases on our customers, and considering stakeholder perspectives. Following discussion, the proposals were approved for filing at the October meeting for MECO and at the January meeting for KEDNY/KEDLI.

  
    

Articles of Association page 177

Audit information page 78

Board of Directors page 43

Business model page 12

Change of control provisions page 184

Code of Ethics page 184

Conflicts of interest page 184

Contractual and other arrangements page 166

Directors’ indemnity page 185

Directors’ share interests page 72

Directors’ service contracts and letters of appointment page 67

Diversity page 25

Dividends page 02

Events after the reporting period page 180

Financial instruments page 95

Future developments page 06

Greenhouse gas emissions page 18

Human Rights page 185

Important events affecting the Company during the year page 04

Internal control page 38

Internal control over financial reporting page 41

Listing Rule 9.8.4 R cross reference table page 185

Material interests in shares page 180

People page 24

Political donations and expenditure page 185

Research and development page 185

Risk management page 38

Share capital page 181

The Directors’ Report, prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006 and the UK Listing Authority’s Listing, and Disclosure and Transparency rules, comprising pages 06 to 75 and 164 to 191, was approved by the Board and signed on its behalf by:

Alison Kay

Group General Counsel & Company Secretary

Company number 4031152

20 May 2015

 

LOGO

 NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16 59Management committees63


Corporate Governancecontinued

Statement of compliance with the UK

Corporate Governance Code

The UK Listing Rules require that listed companies must include in their annual report a statement of whether the Company has complied with all the relevant provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code. The UK Corporate Governance Code was published in September 2014 (the Code), available in full atwww.frc.org.uk.

For the year ended 31 March 2016, the Board considers that it has complied in full with the provisions of the Code. Our statement of compliance opposite explains the main aspects of the Company’s governance structure to give a greater understanding of how the Company has applied the principles and complied with the provisions in the Code. The main report also explains compliance with the Disclosure Rules and Transparency Rules. The index on page 67 sets out where to find each of the disclosures required in the Directors’ Report in respect of Listing Rule 9.8.4, together with the Board’s sign-off on the report.

A. Leadership

A.1 The role of the Board

Our Board is collectively responsible for the effective oversight of the Company and its businesses. It also determines the strategic direction, business plan, objectives, principal risks, viability of the Company and governance structure that will help achieve the long-term success of the Company and deliver sustainable shareholder value.

The Board sets the risk appetite and principal risks for the Company and takes the lead in areas such as safeguarding the reputation of the Company and its financial policy, as well as making sure we maintain a sound system of internal control and risk management (see pages 26 to 29).

There is a clear schedule of matters reserved for the Board and a schedule of delegation, which were both updated in January 2016. The schedule of matters reserved for the Board is available on our website, together with other governance documentation.

A.2 A clear division of responsibilities

The Board supports the separation of the roles of the Chairman and Chief Executive. The key responsibilities are clearly documented and reviewed when appropriate. The Chairman manages and leads the Board. The Chief Executive is responsible for the executive leadership and day-to-day management of the Company and the Group’s businesses, to ensure the delivery of the strategy agreed by the Board.

A.3 Role of the Chairman

The Chairman, who was independent on appointment, is responsible for the leadership and management of the Board and its governance. He makes sure the Board is effective in its role by promoting a culture of openness and debate, facilitating the effective contribution of all Directors and helping to maintain constructive relations between Executive and Non-executive Directors. The Chairman sets the Board’s agenda making sure consideration is given to the main challenges and opportunities facing the Company, and adequate time is available to discuss all items, including strategic issues.

A.4 Role of the Non-executive Directors

Our Senior Independent Director acts as a sounding board for the Chairman and serves as an intermediary for the other Directors, as well as shareholders when required.

Independent of management, our Non-executive Directors bring diverse skills and experience, vital to constructive challenge and debate. Exclusively, they form the Audit, Nominations and Remuneration Committees, and their views are actively sought when developing proposals on strategy.

Around the Board meetings, the Chairman holds meetings with the Non-executive Directors without the Executive Directors present.

64National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16

Corporate Governance


 

Corporate Governance

 

Directors’ Remuneration Report

    

    

 

B. Effectiveness

B.1 The composition of the Board

The Board believes it operates effectively with an appropriate balance of independent Non-executive and Executive Directors who have the right balance of skills, experience, independence and knowledge of the Company.

Details of our Board, their individual biographies and Committee membership are set out on pages 47 and 48. Board and Committee attendance during the year to 31 March 2016 is set out on page 52.

The independence of the Non-executive Directors is considered at least annually along with their character, judgement, commitment and performance on the Board and relevant committees. The Board took into consideration the Code and indicators of potential non-independence, including length of service.

The Board considered Paul Golby’s independence separately following the announcement of his appointment as Chairman of Costain Group plc (a major supplier to the Company). The situational conflict was authorised (including putting in place protective measures to ensure the conflict is appropriately managed) and his independence was confirmed.

At year end, all of the Non-executive Directors, with the exception of the Chairman, who’s independence is only determined on appointment, have been determined by the Board to be independent.

B.2 Appointments to the Board

The Nominations Committee, which comprises the Chairman and Non-executive Directors leads the process for Board appointments and makes recommendations to the Board. The process for the appointment of John Pettigrew as Chief Executive and Nicola Shaw as Executive Director, UK were formal, rigorous and transparent. Further details of each appointment process, succession planning and the role of the Nominations Committee can be found on page 61.

B.3 Time commitment

Non-executive Directors are advised of the time commitment expected from them on appointment. External commitments, which may impact existing time commitments, must be agreed with the Chairman. Details of external appointments are set out in the biographies on pages 47 and 48.

As part of the evaluation of the Chairman, the Non-executive Directors, with input from the Executive Directors, assessed his ability to fulfill his role as Chairman, taking into account other significant appointments.

With the agreement of the Board, Executive Directors gain experience of other companies’ operations, governance frameworks and boardroom dynamics through non-executive appointments. The fees for these positions are retained by the individual.

For further details about the Directors’ service contracts and letters of appointment, see page 74 of the Directors’ Remuneration Report.

B.4 Development

All new Directors are provided with a full induction programme when they are appointed to the Board. Details of Director induction and development can be found on page 51.

B.5 Information and support

The Group General Counsel & Company Secretary makes sure that appropriate and timely information is provided to the Board and its Committees and is responsible for advising and supporting the Chairman and the Board on all governance matters. All Directors have access to the Group General Counsel & Company Secretary and may take independent professional advice at the Company’s expense in conducting their duties.

To support discussion and decision making, Board and committee members receive papers sufficiently in advance of meetings so that they can prepare for and consider agenda items. Additionally, the Chairman holds a short meeting with the Non-executive Directors before each Board meeting to discuss the focus of the upcoming meeting as well as afterwards to share feedback from the meeting. Similarly, the Chief Executive holds a short meeting with the Executive Directors and the Group General Counsel & Company Secretary after each meeting and shares the feedback from these meetings with the Chairman.

Last year we engaged external specialists to review our current papers and develop a new reporting framework for the Board and its Committees. This has continued to result in clearer more concise reporting, allowing more time for quality discussions and questions. A clear set of guidelines are in place to assist the Executive Directors and management on the content and presentation of papers to the Board and committees. A further refresh of the Board paper process will commence this year.

B.6 Evaluation

See pages 52 and 53 for more information on our externally facilitated Board evaluation, undertaken by Independent Audit Limited.

During the year, the Chairman met each Director individually to discuss their contribution, performance over the year and training and development needs. Following these meetings, Sir Peter confirmed to the Nominations Committee that he considered that each Director demonstrated commitment to the role and their performance continued to be effective.

At a private meeting of the Non-executive Directors, Mark Williamson, as Senior Independent Director, led a review of the Chairman’s performance. The Non-executive Directors, with input from the Executive Directors, assessed his ability to fulfil his role as Chairman and considered the arrangements he has in place, given he is also chairman of a FTSE 250 company and the Aircraft Carrier Alliance Management Board and a Trustee of The Sutton Trust Board. They concluded that Sir Peter’s performance continued to be effective.

B.7 Election/re-election

Each Director is subject to election at the first AGM following their appointment, and re-election at each subsequent AGM. Following recommendations from the Nominations Committee the Board considers all Directors continue to be effective, committed to their roles and have sufficient time available to perform their duties. Therefore, in accordance with the Code, Nicola Shaw will seek election and all other Directors will seek re-election at the 2016 AGM as set out in the Notice of Meeting, with the exception of Steve Holliday who is retiring from the Company with effect from 22 July 2016.

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Statement of compliance with the UK Corporate Governance Code65


Corporate Governancecontinued

Statement of compliance with the UK

Corporate Governance Codecontinued

C. Accountability

 

LOGO

D. Remuneration

E. Relations with shareholders

C.1 Financial and business reporting

The requirement for Directors to state that they consider the Annual Report and Accounts, taken as a whole, is fair, balanced and understandable remains a key consideration in the drafting and review process. The coordination and review of the Annual Report is conducted in parallel with the formal audit process undertaken by the external auditors and the review by the Board and its committees (of relevant sections).

The drafting and assurance process supports the Audit Committee’s and Board’s assessment of the overall fairness, balance and clarity of the Annual Report and the statement of Directors’ responsibilities as set out on page 84. The independent auditor’s report is on pages 85 to 92 and the Company’s business model is on pages 14 and 15.

C.2 Risk management and internal control

The Board has carried out a robust assessment of the principal risks facing the Company including those that would threaten the business model, future performance, solvency or liquidity. Further details can be found on pages 27 and 28.

The Board also sets the Company’s risk appetite, internal controls and risk management processes. The Board undertakes a review of their effectiveness annually. Further details are set out on pages 26–29.

The activities of the Audit Committee, which assists the Board with its responsibilities in relation to risk and assurance, are set out on pages 54 to 58.

C.3 Audit Committee and auditors

The Audit Committee report on pages 54 to 58 sets out details of how the Committee has discharged its duties during the year, matters reviewed by the Committee and how it ensures the auditor’s objectivity, effectiveness and continued independence. The Audit Committee report also explains the audit tender process that was undertaken during the year.

D.1 The level and components of remuneration

The Remuneration Committee is responsible for recommending to the Board the remuneration policy for Executive Directors and other members of the Executive Committee and for the Chairman, and for implementing this policy. The aim is to align remuneration policy to Company strategy and key business objectives and make sure it reflects our shareholders’, customers’ and regulators’ interests.

The Remuneration Report on pages 68 to 81 outlines the activities of the Committee during the year and sets out excerpts of the Directors’ remuneration policy table as approved by shareholders at the 2014 AGM.

D.2 Procedure

For further information on the work of the Remuneration Committee and Directors’ remuneration packages see the Directors’ Remuneration Report on pages 68 to 81. The Committee’s terms of reference are available on our website.

E.1 Dialogue with shareholders

The Board as a whole is responsible for making sure that satisfactory dialogue with shareholders takes place. We believe that effective channels of communication with the Company’s debt and equity institutional investors and individual shareholders are very important. More information about our approach to relations with shareholders can be found on page 51.

E.2 Constructive use of General Meetings

The AGM provides a key opportunity for the Board to communicate with and meet shareholders. Shareholders are able to learn more about the Company through exhibits and can ask questions directly of the Board. Company representatives and our Registrar are also on hand to answer any questions shareholders might have.

Our AGM will be held on Monday 25 July 2016 at The International Convention Centre in Birmingham and broadcast via our website. The Notice of Meeting for the 2016 AGM, available on our website, sets out in full the resolutions for consideration by shareholders, together with explanatory notes and further information on the Directors standing for election and re-election.

66National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Corporate Governance


LOGO

Corporate Governance
Index to Directors’ Report and other disclosures
(starting on page indicated)
AGM 66
Articles of Association 187
Audit information 84
Board of Directors 47
Business model 14
Change of control provisions 193
Code of Ethics 193
Conflicts of interest 193
Contractual and other arrangements 176
Directors’ indemnity 194
Directors’ share interests 79
Directors’ service contracts and letters of appointment 74
Diversity 44
Dividends 05
Events after the reporting period 188
Financial instruments 126
Future developments 08
Greenhouse gas emissions 21
Human Rights 194
Important events affecting the Company during the year 06
Internal control 26
Internal control over financial reporting 29
Listing Rule 9.8.4 R cross reference table 194
Material interests in shares 189
People 44
Political donations and expenditure 194
Research and development 194
Risk management 26
Share capital 189
National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16
Index to Directors’ Report and other disclosures
67


Directors’ Remuneration Report

Jonathan Dawson

Committee chairman        

LOGO

 

Annual statement from the

Remuneration Committee chairman

Overview

Last year, over 96%At the Company’s AGM in 2015 more than 97% of shareholders votedvotes cast were to approve a newthe Remuneration Report for that year. As with last year we are not proposing any changes to the formal remuneration policy for National Grid. Although the policy is not subject to shareholder vote againGrid and so this year we have reprinted itthere is only a vote on pages 62 to 68 for easethe implementation of reference. this policy.

The new policy followed an extensive review by the Remuneration Committee to assess how the remuneration framework needed to change to reflect developments in National Grid’s business – the introduction of a new eight year regulatory framework in the UK (RIIO), and the continued evolutionkey elements of our US business.policy are:

 

National Grid’s shareholder returns are earned progressively through two main contributing factors. First, through careful management of long-term assets and their financing; and second, by building for future returns through a substantial, continuing and well-executed programme of long-term capital investment in regulated and non-regulated operations. Our aim was to make sure that shareholders’ and executives’ longer-term interests are clearly aligned through properly focused incentive plans and by requiring executives to have a significant shareholding in the Company. In summary, we concluded that:

 there should be a significant weighting towards longer-termlong-term incentives and longer-term shareholding exposure forversus short-term incentives;
the bulk of senior management through a reductionexecutive remuneration to be paid in National Grid shares, with all of the potential maximum Annual Performance Plan (APP) level, and an increase in the potential maximum Long Term Performance Plan (LTPP) level;

paid only in shares, and half of the bulk of remuneration should beAnnual Performance Plan (APP) paid in National Grid shares;

very high levels of personal shareholding required to be held by senior executives should be required to have a significant mandatory shareholding (500%– 500% of pre-tax salary for the CEO and 400% for other Executive Directors) and that no shares could be sold (exceptDirectors;
three-year performance period for meeting the tax on vesting) until the mandatory shareholding level was attained;

 shares that vestedmeasuring potential awards under the LTPP following the three year performance measurementcoupled with a holding period had to be retained forof a further two years irrespective of whether the mandatory personal shareholding level hadtarget has been attained; and

 theperformance metrics for the LTPP performance should change to Return on Equity (RoE) and value growth.are RoE provides a measurement of(measuring management’s performance in generating profit from the business,business) and value growth capturesValue Growth (measuring management’s longer-termlonger term performance in creating shareholder value.value).

 

We were clear that the new arrangements must only deliver higher rewards when executives had achieved a commensurately stronger performance. We believe that we have set threshold, target and stretch levels of performance accordingly. We also wanted to make sure that our commitment to increasing the annual dividend by at least RPI for the foreseeable future – an important element in shareholders’ total return – was linked to executive remuneration. The Committee, therefore, made it explicit that it had the power to reduce LTPP vesting if the Company failed to honour the dividend commitment, irrespective of the level of vesting resulting from the performance against the LTPP targets set by the Committee.

 

The Remuneration Committee believesWe believe that our policy ensures that the policy endorsed last year byrewards paid to senior executives are closely matched with shareholders’ experience. In particular, we regard it as very important that senior executives see their annual remuneration in the context of a long-term build-up of their investment in National Grid and that the growth in value of their shareholding and the dividends paid on those shares represent a material personal financial exposure to the success of the Company. As a result we think that the overall remuneration structure illustrates a high level of alignment with shareholders, is fully aligned withand promotes an appropriate focus on long-term value within the Company’s strategy and with the experience of shareholders in general. It also believes that, based on our appraisal of performance against our demanding targets to date, the policy is not inflationary compared with previous arrangements. We will, however, continue to reassess remuneration policy and targets for future awards so that we can remain confident they are still meeting the objectives set by the Committee.Company.

 

Performance for the year

APP

National Grid has achievedhad another successful year overall. Record capital investment of strong financial performance in£3.9 billion has been undertaken, split equally between the UK and solid performanceUS, and a programme of critical rate case filings has been successfully initiated in the US with record investment levels. The financial measures forUS. As in prior years, the APP were adjusted EPS and either Group RoE, UK or US RoE depending on role. At 60.6 pence, the adjusted EPS figure for APP was up 6.3 pence (12%) on 2013/14. The EPS figure used for the APP calculationpurposes, 62.3 pence, differs slightly tofrom the reported EPS figure of 58.163.5 pence as it is adjusted for the impact of timing, scrip dividend uptake and actuarial assumptions on pensions and other post-employment benefits (OPEB). Group RoE was 11.8%, ahead of last year’s 11.4% result. Our UK RoE was 14.3%, including the benefit of a legal settlement referredexchange rate effects. It has also been reduced to in the reporttake account of the Audit Committee on page 52. In the US, our RoE was 8.4%, which was slightly down on last year. As a result, in respectabsence of financial metrics for the APP (representing 70% of the value of the award), we have made awards of between 50% and 100% of the maximum potential to the Executive Directors. The balance of the APP award is represented by performance against personal objectives set by the Remuneration Committee. As a result, we have made APP awards to the Executive Directors of between 64% and 119% of salary. Details of each Executive Director’s APP award are set out on page 70. This is the first year of the new policy for maximum APP payments, with the maximum being reduced from 150% of salary (for the 2013/14 awards) to 125%.

LTPP

2014 was the first year in which the maximum potential for the LTPP awarded during the year was increased in line with the new remuneration policy from 225% to 350% of salary for the Chief Executive and 200% to 300% of salary for the other Executive Directors. This is a three year plan and the performance outcomes will only be determined in July 2017. In 2014/15, Group RoE and value growth were both on target in relation to the 2014 LTPP parameters, with UK RoE around stretch, and US RoE below threshold.

The LTPP that vested during 2014/15 was that awarded in 2011. This included three performance measures: adjusted EPS; relative total shareholder return (TSR); and UK and US returns. The EPS measure vested at 31%, reflecting EPS growth just above the threshold target for this measure. The TSR measure vested at 98.3%, which reflects an annualised return to shareholders of 18.9% over the period. The UK and US returns measures are expected to vest at 100% and 25.9% respectively, reflecting strong operational performanceincrease in the UK including the first two years of RIIO, and the impact ofcorporate tax rate base growth and higher winter related costs in the US. As a result, the 2011 LTPP vested at between 46% and 66% for the Executive Directors. Details of each Executive Director’s vested LTPP are set out on pages 70 and 71.

Future targets

Details of future targets and historical performance are disclosed each year in respect of the LTPP. Details of historical performance against targets are disclosed each year in respect of the APP. We provide these details on pages 70 to 72 and page 74. Taking account of this year’s performance, as well as the challenges

originally included

       60


in the Group budget. The overall impact of these adjustments was a decrease of 1.2 pence. Similarly, the Group RoE figure used for the APP calculation, 12.0%, has been reduced by 0.3 percentage points to take account of the absence of the increase in the UK corporate tax rate referred to above. Notwithstanding this, the EPS of 62.3 pence and Group RoE of 12.0% both met or exceededthe stretch performance levels set by the Committee at the start of the year, benefitting from realised gains achieved from the exchange of National Grid USA’s share in the Iroquois pipeline joint venture and strong results from our Other businesses led by the performance of the French interconnector. In the UK, the regulated businesses delivered good returns of 13.3%. Regulated US RoE was 8.0%, which reflected steady performance though was down on last year due to continued cost pressures as the business awaits outcomes of rate case filings. This figure, however, does not capture the gains achieved from the exchange of National Grid USA’s share in the Iroquois pipeline joint venture referred to above, and therefore has been adjusted by the Committee to reflect half of this gain for US participants in the APP, which the Committee believes properly reflects performance.

As a result, in respect of the financial measures for the APP (representing 70% of the value of the APP) the Committee made awards to Executive Directors ranging from 75% to 100% of the maximum potential for financial performance. The balance of the award (30% by value) is represented by individual executives’ assessed performance against specific objectives set by the Committee at the start of the year, resulting in awards ranging from 80% to 86% of the maximum potential for individual performance. In aggregate, therefore, Executive Directors’ APP awards fall in the range of 95% to 119% of salary. This compares with last year’s APP awards where the range was 65% to 119% of salary.

Because of commercial sensitivity we retrospectively disclose annual targets for the APP, which are set out on page 76. This year, we have sought to enhance our disclosure, including the retrospective disclosure of threshold and stretch performance levels for EPS and Group RoE, which now sits alongside the disclosure of our LTPP threshold and stretch performance levels. Target performance levels for both EPS and Group RoE were higher than for 2014/15; however, the target performance levels for UK RoE and US RoE were reduced, due to the expected returns under the RIIO framework in the UK and the impact of the timing of rate plan filings in the US. We have decided to maintain the same performance metrics for the 2016/17 APP awards and we will repeat our retrospective disclosure of performance levels in next year’s remuneration report.

LTPP

The LTPP that vested in 2015/16 was that awarded in 2012. Vesting outcomes ranged from 63% to 76% of maximum. Before making its final determination of executives’ annual and long-term awards, the Committee gives careful consideration to a number of important non-financial measures including our safety performance, reliability and levels of customer satisfaction in both the UK and the US, and considers whether a downward adjustment should be made to any executive’s award. This year the Committee concluded that there was no reason to make any adjustment. As our Executive Director, US, Dean Seavers, only joined the Board at the beginning of 2015/16, he has not received any vested LTPP for this year, and will not do so until 2017.

The award made in 2015 is the second award in respect of the LTPP granted under the new remuneration policy in 2014. This is a three-year plan with a maximum award of 350% of salary for the CEO and 300% for the other Executive Directors. Its outcome will only be known

 

68National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Corporate Governance


ahead, after careful consideration

   Corporate Governance

following the results for the year ending March 2017. I reported last year that, at the end of the first performance year, Group RoE and Value Growth were on target in relation to the parameters set by the Committee, with UK RoE around stretch and US RoE below threshold. For this year the position is broadly comparable in respect of both the 2014 and 2015 LTPP grants. Taking account of performance to date of the 2014 and 2015 LTPP awards, the Committee has decided to retainmake no changes to the same weighting of performance metrics and the same targets for the 20152016 LTPP as last year and the same framework of metrics for the 2015/16 APP awards. The Committee believes that the targets for these metrics set appropriately demanding levels for executive performance. For the 2015 LTPP, the maximum payout will require an average annual Group RoE of 12.5% and an average annual value growth of 12% over the three year performance period. We will again review performance against metrics next year to judge whether any changes should be made to the weighting of the metrics or to the targets underlying the incentive in future awards.award.

 

Executive Director shareholdings

Two years ago, we introduced high levels of shareholding requirements for our Executive Directors, are now requiredin order to build up and hold a significant shareholding in the Company (500% of gross salary for the CEO and 400% for the other Executive Directors). Steve Holliday’s current shareholding is significantly above his shareholding requirement. The other Executive Directors, duefurther align them to their relatively short time in the role, have not yet reached their increased level of shareholding requirement. On current projections,our shareholders. At 31 March 2016, both Andrew Bonfield and Steve Holliday have exceeded these shareholding requirements. As John Pettigrew should reach their required shareholding in 2017 and 2018 respectively. As Dean Seavers was onlywere appointed to the Board relatively recently, neither of them has yet met their shareholding requirements and will therefore not be given permission to sell shares until they have done so, other than to pay tax on receipt of the vested shares or in exceptional circumstances.

Changes to the Board

Following the announcement of Steve Holliday’s retirement as CEO, John Pettigrew was promoted to CEO with effect from 1 April 2015, he is expected to take somewhat longer to reach his required shareholding.

Executive Director changes

Nick Winser stepped down from the Board2016. John’s salary has been set at the 2014 AGM and will leave the Company£825,000. His APP opportunity remains at the end of July 2015 when his role will be redundant. Details of his termination payments are summarised on page 72. In October last year, it was announced that Tom King would also leave the Company at the end of March 2015 and would be succeeded as an Executive Director and President of National Grid’s US business by Dean Seavers. Tom King’s termination payments are also detailed on page 72. I confirm that all such payments to Nick Winser and to Tom King are in line with approved policy.

Dean Seavers joined the Company on 1 December 2014, and joined the Board on 1 April 2015, with a starting salary of US$1,000,000. He will be eligible for a prorated APP in respect of 2014/15 and also received an award of 300% of salary in respect of the 2014 LTPP. In addition to his starting package, he also received compensation for bonuses from his former employer that have been foregone amounting to US$250,000 paid on joining and a further US$250,000 to be paid one year later. He is a member of the US Defined Contribution Core Plan with Company contributions based on a percentage125% of salary, and his LTPP opportunity has increased to 350% of salary from 2016 onwards. Steve stepped down as CEO on 31 March 2016 but will remain on the Board until 22 July to facilitate a successful transition. In March, we announced that Nicola Shaw will join the Board as our new UK Executive Director on 1 July 2016, succeeding John. Nicola’s salary has been set at £450,000. Her APP awardopportunity is 125% of salary and her LTPP opportunity is 300% of salary. Nicola will be eligible to receive a 401(k) plan match.2016 LTPP award. In addition, she will receive a cash payment of up to £485,000 to compensate her for incentive cash awards that were due to vest in June 2016 that she has foregone on leaving her former employer. Subject to their individual performance, the Committee intends to increase each of John’s and Nicola’s salaries towards market level by way of future phased increases from 2017 in excess of those awarded to other Company employees. All of these arrangements are in line with the approved policy on recruitment remuneration.remuneration and have already been announced.

 

SalariesAnnual salary review

For the year ahead, the Committee has awarded a salary increase of just below 1% to both Steve HollidayHolliday’s and Andrew Bonfield which is less than the 1.9%Bonfield’s annual salary budget agreed for the 2015 managerial salary reviewsalaries were increased by approximately 1% in the UK. Dean Seavers will not receive any salary increase from 1 June 2015 which reflects the decision to have a 0% annual salary budget for the 2015 managerial salary review in the US.

John Pettigrew joined the Board on 1 April 2014 with a starting salary of £475,000 and he did not receive any salary increase from 1 June 2014.2015. In line with the policy on recruitment remuneration,US managerial pay budget, Dean Seavers’ annual

salary was not increased in 2015. John Pettigrew’s salary was increased by 7% to move his salary was set belowcloser towards market as Executive Director, UK in 2015. In line with regional managerial pay budgets in 2016, salary increases in 2016 are 2% for Andrew Bonfield and 2.5% for Dean Seavers.

Impact of the expected sale of a majority interest in the UK Gas Distribution business

Ahead of the expected sale of a majority interest in the Gas Distribution business in 2016/17, the Committee is considering the impact on inflight LTPP and APP awards, and will make appropriate adjustments to relevant metrics within both the parameters and the spirit of the remuneration policy following any such sale. We will report this to you in next year’s remuneration report.

Conclusion

As I reported last year, remuneration continues to be in a transitional phase since the APP maximum has been lowered to 125% of salary from 150% while the LTPP represents previous bases of measurements, timescales and policy limits. This transition will continue for a further year when the final element of the 2013 LTPP vests in 2017 and the 2014 LTPP (the first awarded under the current remuneration policy) matures.

As with last year, we are not seeking any changes to the current remuneration policy, which will expire at the 2017 AGM. The Committee has begun to address whether the current policy should be proposed without any material changes or whether some modification may be required to reflect changes in the market rateand the evolution of the Company. I will report on the outcome of this review next year when we will seek your authority for equivalent roles. Ina new three-year policy mandate.

Regarding the report last2015/16 year, the Committee indicatedbelieves that it would exercise its discretion in line withhas correctly implemented the approved policy to increase his salary towards market level by way of future increases in excess of those awarded

to the wider workforce and inflation, subject to his performance. The Committee has decided to award him a 7% increase in salary from 1 June 2015 with further above inflation increases planned in the future to bring him closer to the market rate for his role, subject to his ongoing performance.

Conclusion

The Committee considers that the remuneration earned last year by Executive Directors is a fair reflection ofsenior executives properly reflects the value achieved for shareholders. Their remuneration is, however, in a transitional phase since the APP outturn reflects a lower maximum potential (125% of salary versus 150% previously) while the level of LTPP vesting reflects both the previous policy limits and also the previous bases of measurement. This transitional phase will continue until 2017 when the last element of the 2013 LTPP finally vests and the 2014 LTPP (under the new policy) matures. We will report in detail on each element during this period to give shareholders as clear a view as is possible about the underlying performance of the new policy. This yearCompany and the Committee is not seeking any changesvalue generated for shareholders. Accordingly, I commend this remuneration report to remuneration policy, so the only shareholder voteyou on remuneration is an advisory vote on the Directors’ Remuneration Report (Resolution 16). We believe we have correctly and fairly implemented the approved policy during the past year. We also believe that, while it is too early to be definitive, the new incentive arrangements that we initiated last year are beginning to prove their merits. On behalf of the Committee, I commend this report to you and ask for your support for the resolution to approve the report at the AGM.

LOGO

Jonathan Dawson

Committee chairman

 

At a glance

 

 

Performance

A comparison of the total 2015/16 single total figure of remuneration to the maximum remuneration if variable pay had vested in full is set out below.

 

 

 

Total remuneration

      

 

LOGO

 

Executive Director  Maximum
remuneration
£’000
   

2015/16 single figure  
remuneration  

£’000  

  

Andrew Bonfield

   4,077    3,228    

Steve Holliday

   6,478    5,151    

John Pettigrew

   1,815    1,569    

Dean Seavers

   1,883    1,684    
      

National Grid Annual General Meeting.Report and Accounts 2015/16At a glance69


Corporate Governancecontinued

At a glancecontinued

 

 

Directors’ remuneration policy – approved by shareholders in 2014

The full Directors’ remuneration policy approved for three years from the date of the 2014 AGM held on 28 July 2014 is shown on pages 62 to 68 for ease of reference only.A shareholder vote on remuneration policy is not required in 2015. Please note that the information shown has been updated to take account of the fact that the policy is now approved and current rather than proposed. The tables showing the total remuneration opportunity on page 68 have also been updated to take account of Board departures and joiners and June 2015 salary levels. A copy of the remuneration policy is available on the Company website at investors.nationalgrid.com/reports/2013-14 (pages 60 to 66).

There may be circumstances from time to time when the Committee will consider it appropriate to apply some judgement and exercise discretion in respect of the approved policy. This ability to apply discretion is highlighted where relevant in the policy, and the use of discretion will always be in the spirit of the approved policy.

The Committee will honour any commitments made to Directors before the policy outlined in this report came into effect.

 

 Key features of policy 

Annual report on remuneration

Our peer group

The Committee benchmarks its remuneration policy against appropriate peer groups annually to make sure we remain competitive in the relevant markets. The primary focus for reward benchmarking is the2015/16

LOGO     Targeted broadly at mid-market against FTSE 11-40 for UK-basedUK Executive Directors and general industry and energy services companies with similar levels of revenue for US-basedUS Executive Directors. These peer groups are considered appropriateDirectors

Salary increases of 0–7% for a large, complex, international and predominantly regulated business.

2015
   

Salary increases of 2–2.5% for 2016

Hired Nicola Shaw as new Executive Director, UK on an annual base salary of £450,000

Appointed John Pettigrew as CEO on an annual base salary of £825,000

LOGO

Maximum opportunity is 125% of salary70% based on financial metrics (35% EPS, 35% RoE), 30% based on individual objectives
50% paid in cash, 50% paid in shares, which must be retained until later of two years and meeting shareholding requirement 

LOGO

Group RoE for CEO and Finance Director; UK RoE for Executive Director, UK; US RoE for Executive Director, US
Subject to both clawback and malus
 NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15  61


  

Corporate GovernanceIndividual objectives cover: safety and compliance; Group and financial strategy; business growth; operational excellence; customer experience; employee engagement; capability development; and stakeholder relations

 

LOGO

 

Directors’ Remuneration Reportcontinued

Maximum award level is 350% of salary for CEO and 300% for other Executive Directors50% value growth, 50% RoE
Group RoE for CEO and Finance Director; even split of Group and UK RoE for Executive Director, UK; even split of Group and US RoE for Executive Director, US
Vesting subject to long-term performance conditions. Shares must be retained until later of two years from vesting and meeting shareholding requirement
Three-year performance period

Subject to both clawback and malus

LOGO

External appointees participate in Defined Contribution (DC) plan or cash in lieu of pension; internal appointees retain current benefits, subject to capping of pensionable pay increases for Defined Benefit (DB) plansUK DB (Steve Holliday, John Pettigrew): maximum of two-thirds final capped pensionable pay or (Steve Holliday) one thirtieth accrual
UK cash allowance (Andrew Bonfield): 30% of salary
Pensionable pay is salary only in UK and salary and APP in US in alignment with the market
US DC (Dean Seavers): 9% of pensionable pay with additional match of up to 4%
Other benefits as appropriate

Other benefits include private medical insurance, life assurance, and, for UK Executive Directors, either a fully expensed car or a cash alternative to a car and the use of a driver when required

 

LOGO

500% of salary for CEOSteve Holliday and Andrew Bonfield have both met their shareholding requirements

400% of salary for other

Executive Directors

   

John Pettigrew and Dean Seavers were appointed to the Board relatively recently, and therefore have not yet met their shareholding requirements

 

 

70National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Corporate Governance


 

   Corporate Governance

Directors’ remuneration policy – approved by shareholders in 2014

Key aspects of the Directors’ remuneration policy, along with elements particularly applicable to the 2015/16 financial year are shown on pages 71–74 for ease of reference only. This policy was approved for three years from the date of the 2014 AGM held on 28 July 2014. A shareholder vote on the remuneration policy is not required in 2016. Please note that the information shown has been updated to take account of the fact that the policy is now approved and current rather than proposed. A copy of the full remuneration policy is available on the Company website atwww.investors.nationalgrid.com/reports/2013-14.

There may be circumstances from time to time when the Committee will consider it appropriate to apply some judgement and exercise discretion in respect of the approved policy. This ability to apply discretion is highlighted where relevant in the policy, and the use of discretion will always be in the spirit of the approved policy.

Our peer group

The Committee benchmarks its remuneration policy against appropriate peer groups annually to make sure we remain competitive in the relevant markets. The primary focus for reward benchmarking is the FTSE 11-40 for UK-based Executive Directors and general industry and energy services companies with similar levels of revenue for US-based Executive Directors. These peer groups are considered appropriate for a large, complex, international and predominantly regulated business.

Approved policy table – Executive Directors

 

Salary

  

Purpose and link to strategy: to attract, motivate and retain high-calibre individuals, while
not overpaying.

Operation

 

  

Operation

  

Maximum levels

 

  

 

Performance metrics, weighting


and time period applicable

 

 

Salaries are targeted broadly at mid-market level.

 

No prescribed maximum annual increase.Not applicable.

They are generally reviewed annually. Salary reviews take into account:

 

  business and individual contribution;

  the individual’s skills and experience;

  scope of the role, including any changes in responsibility; and

  market data in the relevant comparator group.

  

No prescribed maximum annual increase.

 

Any increases are generally aligned to salary increases received by other Company employees and to market movement. Increases in excess of this may be made at the Committee’s discretion in circumstances such as a significant change in responsibility; progression in the role; and alignment to market level.

 

  

Benefits  

Not applicable.

Benefits

Purpose and link to strategy: to provide competitive and cost-effective benefits to attract
and retain high-calibre individuals.

 

Operation

 

 

Maximum levels

 

  

 

Performance metrics, weighting


and time period applicable

 

 

Benefits provided include:

 

Benefits have no predetermined maximum, as the cost of providing these varies from year to year.

Participation in tax-approved all-employee share plans is subject to limits set by the relevant tax authorities from time to time.

Not applicable.

company car or a cash alternative (UK only);

use of a driver when required;

private medical insurance;

life assurance;

personal accident insurance;

opportunity to purchase additional benefits under flexible benefits schemes available to all employees; and

opportunity to participate in the following HM Revenue & Customs (UK) or Internal Revenue Service (US) tax advantagedtax-advantaged all-employee share plans:

 

Sharesave: UK employees may make monthly contributions from net salary for a period of 3three or 5five years. The savings can be used to purchase shares at a discounted price, set at the launch of each plan period.

 

Share Incentive Plan (SIP): UK employees may use gross salary to purchase shares. These shares are placed in trust.

 

Benefits have no pre-determined maximum, as the cost of providing these varies from year to year.

Participation in tax approved all-employee share plans is subject to limits set by the relevant tax authorities from time to time.

Not applicable.

Incentive Thrift Plans (401(k) plans): US employees may participate in these tax-advantaged savings plans. They are DC pension plans in which employees can invest their own and Company contributions.

 

Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP) (423(b) plan): eligible US employees may purchase ADSs on a monthly basis at a discounted price.

 

Other benefits may be offered at the discretion of the Committee.

   

 

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Directors’ remuneration policy – approved by shareholders in 201471


Corporate Governancecontinued

Directors’ remuneration policy – approved by shareholders in 2014continued

 

     62Pension


  

 

Purpose and link to strategy: to reward sustained contribution and assist attraction and retention.

 

  Pension

Purpose and link to strategy: to reward sustained contribution and assist attraction and
retention.

Operation

  

Maximum levels

   

 

Performance metrics, weighting

OperationMaximum levelsand time period applicable

 

 

Pension for a new Executive Director will reflect whether they are internally promoted or externally appointed.

UK DB a maximum pension on retirement, at age 60, of two thirds final capped pensionable pay or up to one thirtieth accrual. On death in service, a lump sum of four times pensionable pay and a two thirds dependant’s pension is provided.

UK DC annual contributions of 30% of salary. Life assurance provision of four times pensionable salary and a spouse’s pension equal to one third of the Director’s salary are provided on death in service.

US DB an Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan provides for an unreduced pension benefit at age 62. For retirements at age 62 with 35 years of service, the pension benefit would be approximately two thirds of pensionable pay. Upon death in service, the spouse would receive 50% of the pension benefit (100% if the participant died while an active employee after the age of 55).

US DC 9% of base salary plus APP with additional 401(k) plan match of up to 4%.

Not applicable.

 

If internally promoted:

 

retention of existing DB benefits without enhancement, except for capping of pensionable pay increases following promotion to Board; or

retention of existing UK DC benefits or equivalent cash in lieu;
or

retention of existing US DC benefits plus 401(k) plan match, provided through 401(k) plan and non-qualified plans.

 

If externally appointed:

 

UK DC benefits or equivalent cash in lieu; or

US DC benefits plus 401(k) plan match.

 

Andrew Bonfield, John Pettigrew and Dean Seavers are treated in line with the above policy.

 

Steve Holliday and Nick Winser areis provided with final salary pension benefits. For service prior to 1 April 2013, pensionable pay is normally the base salary in the 12 months prior to leaving the Company. For service from 1 April 2013 increases to pensionable pay are capped at the lower of 3% or the increase in inflation. The pension scheme rules allow for indexed prior salaries to be used for all members. They participateHe participates in the unfunded scheme in respect of benefits in excess of the Lifetime Allowance.

Tom King participated in a qualified pension plan and in an Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan. These plans were non-contributory, cash balance and final average pay plans. Tom’s benefits included compensation to buy out entitlements from his former employer that were lost on recruitment to National Grid.

 

In line with market practice, pensionable pay for UK-based Executive Directors includes salary only and for US-based Executive Directors it includes salary and APP award.

 

 

UK DB: a maximum pension on retirement, at age 60, of two thirds final capped pensionable pay or up to one thirtieth accrual. On death in service, a lump sum of four times pensionable pay and a two thirds dependant’s pension is provided.

UK DC: annual contributions of 30% of salary. Life assurance provision of four times pensionable salary and a spouse’s pension equal to one third of the Director’s salary are provided on death in service.

US DB: an Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan provides for an unreduced pension benefit at age 62 (at age 55 in Tom King’s case). For retirements at age 62 with 35 years of service, the pension benefit would be approximately two thirds of pensionable pay. Upon death in service, the spouse would receive 50% of the pension benefit (100% if the participant died while an active employee after the age of 55).

US DC: 9% of base salary plus APP with additional 401(k) plan match of up to 4%.

  

 

Not applicable.

LOGO

 

        NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/1563                                


Corporate Governance

Directors’ Remuneration Reportcontinued

Annual

Performance Plan

  

Purpose and link to strategy: to incentivise and reward the achievement of annual financial
and strategic business targets and the delivery of annual individual objectives.

 

 

Operation

Maximum levels

   

 

Performance metrics, weighting

OperationMaximum levelsand time period applicable

 

 

Performance metrics and targets are agreed at the start of each financial year. Performance metrics are aligned with strategic business priorities. Targets are set with reference to the budget. Awards are paid in June.

 

For APP awards made in 2013/14, 50% of any award was deferred into shares in the Deferred Share Plan (DSP). The DSP has no performance conditions and vests after three years, subject to continued employment. These shares are subject to forfeiture for leavers in certain circumstances.

 

The DSP has beenwas discontinued for APP awards made in respect of years from 2014/15. Instead, 50% of awards are paid in shares, which (after any sales to pay tax) must be retained until the shareholding requirement is met, and in any event for two years after receipt.

 

Awards are subject to clawback and malus provisions.

 

 

The maximum award is 125% of salary.

 

 

A significant majority of the APP is based on performance against corporate financial measures, with the remainder based on performance against individual objectives. Individual objectives are role specific.role-specific.

 

The Committee may use its discretion to set measures that it considers appropriate in each financial year and reduce the amount payable, taking account of significant safety or customer service standard incidents, environmental and governance issues.

 

The payout levels at threshold, target and stretch performance levels are 0%, 50% and 100% respectively.

  
  

Long Term

72National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Corporate Governance


Performance Plan   Corporate Governance

 

Long Term Performance Plan  

Purpose and link to strategy: to drive long-term performance, aligning Executive Director
incentives to key strategic objectives and shareholder interests.

 

Operation  

Operation

Maximum levels

 

 

Performance metrics, weighting

and time period applicable

 

Awards of shares may be granted each year, with vesting subject to long-term performance conditions.

 

The performance metrics have been chosen as the Committee believes they reflect the creation of long-term value within the business. Targets are set each year with reference to the business plan.

 

Awards are subject to clawback and malus provisions. Notwithstanding the level of award achieved against the performance conditions, the Committee may use its discretion to reduce the amount vesting, and in particular will take account of compliance with the dividend policy.

For awards granted from 2014, participants must retain vested shares (after any sales to pay tax) until the shareholding requirement is met, and in any event for a further two years after vesting.

  

The maximum award for the CEO is 350% of salary and it is 300% of salary for the other Executive Directors.

 

For awards made between 2011 and 2013, the maximum award for the CEO was 225% of salary and 200% for the other Executive Directors.

 

For awards between 2011 and 2013 the performance measures and weightings were:

 

adjusted EPS (50%) measured over three years;

TSR relative to the FTSE 100 (25%) measured over three years; and

UK or US RoE relative to allowed regulatory returns (25%) measured over four years.

 

From 2014, the performance measures are:

 

value growth and Group RoE (for the CEO and Finance Director); and

    

value growth, Group RoE and UK or US RoE (for the UK and US Executive Directors respectively).

LTPP table continued opposite

     64


Long Term Performance

Plan continued

Purpose and link to strategy: to drive long-term performance, aligning Executive Director
incentives to key strategic objectives and shareholder interests.

Operation

Maximum levels

Performance metrics, weighting

and time period applicable

For awards granted from 2014, participants must retain vested shares (after any sales to pay tax) until the shareholding requirement is met, and in any event for a further two years after vesting.

   

 

All are measured over a three yearthree-year period.

 

The weightings of these measures may vary year to year, but would always remain such that the value growth metric would never fall below a 25% weighting and never rise above a 75% weighting.

 

Between 2011 and 2013, 25% of the award vested at threshold and 100% at stretch, with straight-line vesting in between. From 2014, only 20% of the award vests at threshold.

Approved policy table – Non-executive Directors (NEDs)

 

Fees for NEDs  

Purpose and link to strategy: to attract NEDs who have a broad range of experience and skills
to oversee the implementation of our strategy.

 

Operation

  

Maximum levels

 

 

Performance metrics, weighting

and
time period applicable

 

NED fees (excluding those of the Chairman) are set by the Executive Committee in conjunction with the Chairman; the Chairman’s fees are set by the Committee.

 

Fee structure:

 

  Chairman fee;

  basic fee, which differs for UK- and US-based NEDs;

  committee membership fee;

  committee chair fee; and

  Senior Independent Director fee.

There are no maximum fee levels.

The benefits provided to the Chairman are not subject to a predetermined maximum cost,

as the cost of providing these

varies from year to year.

Not applicable.

 

Fees are reviewed every year and are benchmarked against those in companies of similar scale and complexity.

 

NEDs do not participate in incentive or pension plans and, with the exception of the Chairman, are not eligible to receive benefits. The Chairman is covered by the Company’s private medical and personal accident insurance plans and receives a fully expensed car or cash alternative to a car, with the use of a driver, when required.

 

There is no provision for termination payments.

 

   

There are no maximum fee levels.

The benefits provided to the Chairman are not subject to a predetermined maximum cost, as the cost of providing these varies from year to year.

Not applicable.

LOGO

NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/1565


Corporate Governance

 

Directors’ Remuneration Reportcontinued

 

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Directors’ remuneration policy – approved by shareholders in 201473


Corporate Governancecontinued

Directors’ remuneration policy – approved by shareholders in 2014continued

Shareholding requirement

The requirement of Executive Directors to build up and hold a relatively high value of National Grid shares ensures they share a significant level of risk with shareholders and their interests are aligned.

 

From 2014/15, Executive Directors are required to build up and retain shares in the Company. The level of holding required is 500% of salary for the CEO and 400% of salary for the other Executive Directors.

 

Unless the shareholding requirement is met, Executive Directors will not be permitted to sell shares, other than to pay tax or in exceptional circumstances.

The Company includes in its annual employee opinion survey questions on the appropriateness of the pay arrangements within the Company. It does not specifically invite employees to comment on the Directors’ remuneration policy but any comments made by employees are noted.

Policy on recruitment remuneration

Salaries for new Executive Directors appointed to the Board will be set in accordance with the terms of the approved remuneration policy in force at the time of appointment, and in particular will take account of the appointee’s skills and experience as well as the scope and market rate for the role.

Where appropriate, salaries may be set below market level initially, with the Committee retaining discretion to award increases in salary in excess of those of the wider workforce and inflation to bring salary to a market level over time, where this is justified by individual and Company performance.

Benefits consistent with those offered to other Executive Directors under the approved remuneration policy in force at the time of appointment will be offered, taking account of local market practice. The Committee may also agree that the Company will meet certain costs associated with the recruitment, for example legal fees, and the Committee may agree to meet certain relocation expenses or provide tax equalisation as appropriate.

Pensions for new Executive Directors appointed to the Board will be set in accordance with the terms of the approved remuneration policy in force at the time of appointment.

Ongoing incentive pay (APP and LTPP) for new Executive Directors will be in accordance with the approved remuneration policy in force at the time of appointment. This means the maximum APP award in any year would be 125% of salary and the maximum LTPP award would be 300% of salary (350% of salary for a new CEO).

For an externally appointed Executive Director, the Company may offer additional cash or share-based payments that it considers necessary to buy out current entitlements from the former employer that will be lost on recruitment to National Grid. Any such arrangements would reflect the delivery mechanisms, time horizons and levels of conditionality of the remuneration lost.

In order to facilitate buy-out arrangements as described above, existing incentive arrangements will be used to the extent possible, although awards may also be granted outside of these shareholder-approved schemes if necessary and as permitted under the Listing Rules.

For an internally appointed Executive Director, any outstanding variable pay element awarded in respect of the prior role will continue on its original terms.

Fees for a new Chairman or Non-executive Director will be set in line with the approved policy in force at the time of appointment.

Policy on payment for loss of office

In line with our policy, all Executive Directors have service contracts which are terminable by either party with 12 months’ notice.

The contracts contain provisions for payment in lieu of notice, at the sole and absolute discretion of the Company. Such payments are limited to payment of salary only for the remainder of the notice period. In the UK such payments would be phased on a monthly basis, over a period no greater than 12 months, and the Executive Director would be expected to mitigate any losses where employment is taken up during the notice period. In the US, for tax purposes the policy is to make any payment in lieu of notice as soon as reasonably practicable, and in any event within two and a half months of the later of 31 December and 31 March immediately following the notice date.

In the event of a UK Director being made redundant, statutory compensation would apply and the relevant pension plan rules may result in the early payment of an unreduced pension.

On termination of employment, no APP award would generally be payable and any DSP awards would generally lapse. However, the Committee has the discretion to deem an individual to be a ‘good leaver’, in which case an APP award would be payable on the termination date, based on performance during the financial year up to termination, and DSP awards would vest on the termination date. Examples of circumstances in which a Director would be treated as a ‘good leaver’ include redundancy, retirement, illness, injury, disability and death. Any APP award would be prorated and would be subject to performance achieved against the objectives for that year.

On termination of employment, outstanding awards under the share plans will be treated in accordance with the relevant plan rules approved by shareholders. Share awards would normally lapse. ‘Good leaver’ provisions apply at the Committee’s discretion and in specified circumstances, including redundancy, retirement, illness, injury, disability and death, where awards will be released to the departing Executive Director or, in the case of death, to their estate. Long-term share plan awards held by ‘good leavers’ may vest subject to performance measured at the normal vesting date and are prorated. Such awards would vest at the same time as for other participants.

The Chairman’s appointment is subject to six months’ notice by either party; for the other Non-executive Directors, notice is one month. No compensation is payable to Non-executive Directors if required to stand down.

 

Policy on recruitment remuneration

Salaries for new Executive Directors appointed to the Board will be set in accordance with the terms of the approved remuneration policy in force at the time of appointment, and in particular will take account of the appointee’s skills and experience as well as the scope and market rate for the role.

Where appropriate, salaries may be set below market level initially, with the Committee retaining discretion to award increases in salary in excess of those of the wider workforce and inflation to bring salary to a market level over time, where this is justified by individual and Company performance.

Benefits consistent with those offered to other Executive Directors under the approved remuneration policy in force at the time of appointment will be offered, taking account of local market practice. The Committee may also agree that the Company will meet certain costs associated with the recruitment, for example legal fees, and the Committee may agree to meet certain relocation expenses or provide tax equalisation as appropriate.

Pensions for new Executive Directors appointed to the Board will be set in accordance with the terms of the approved remuneration policy in force at the time of appointment.

Ongoing incentive pay (APP and LTPP) for new Executive Directors will be in accordance with the approved remuneration policy in force at the time of appointment. This means the maximum APP award in any year would be 125% of salary and the maximum LTPP award would be 300% of salary (350% of salary for a new CEO).

For an externally appointed Executive Director, the Company may offer additional cash or share-based payments that it considers necessary to buy out current entitlements from the former employer that will be lost on recruitment to National Grid. Any such arrangements would reflect the delivery mechanisms, time horizons and levels of conditionality of the remuneration lost.

In order to facilitate buy-out arrangements as described above, existing incentive arrangements will be used to the extent possible, although awards may also be granted outside of these shareholder-approved schemes if necessary and as permitted under the Listing Rules.

For an internally appointed Executive Director, any outstanding variable pay element awarded in respect of the prior role will continue on its original terms.

Fees for a new Chairman or Non-executive Director will be set in line with the approved policy in force at the time of appointment.

Differences in remuneration policy for all employees

The remuneration policy for the Executive Directors is designed with regard to the policy for employees across the Company as a whole. However, there are some differences in the structure of remuneration policy for the senior executives. In general, these differences arise from the development of remuneration arrangements that are market competitive for our various employee categories. They also reflect the fact that, in the case of the Executive Directors, a greater emphasis tends to be placed on performance-related pay in the market, in particular long-term performance-related pay.

All employees are entitled to base salary, benefits and pension. Many employees are eligible for an APP award based on Company and/or individual performance. Eligibility and the maximum opportunity available is based on market practice for the employee’s job band. In addition, around 350 senior management employees are eligible to participate in the LTPP.

The Company has a number of all-employee share plans that provide employees with the opportunity to become, and to think like, a shareholder. These plans include Sharesave and the SIP in the UK and the 401(k) and 423(b) plans in the US. Further information is provided on page 62.

Consideration of remuneration policy elsewhere

in the Company

In setting the remuneration policy, the Committee considers the remuneration packages offered to employees across the Company. As a point of principle, salaries, benefits, pensions and other elements of remuneration are benchmarked regularly to ensure they remain competitive in the markets in which we operate. In undertaking such benchmarking, our aim is to be at mid-market level for all job bands, including those subject to union negotiation.

As would be expected, we have differences in pay and benefits across the business which reflect individual responsibility and there are elements of remuneration policy which apply to all, for example, flexible benefits and share plans.

When considering annual salary increases, the Committee reviews the proposals for salary increases for the employee population generally, as it does for any other changes to remuneration policy being considered. This will include a report on the status of negotiations with any trade union represented employees.

 

       6674National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Corporate Governance 


 

 

   Corporate Governance

Annual report on remuneration

Statement of implementation of remuneration policy in 2015/16

Role of Remuneration Committee

The Committee is responsible for recommending to the Board the remuneration policy for Executive Directors and the other members of the Executive Committee and for the Chairman, and for implementing this policy. The aim is to align remuneration policy to Company strategy and key business objectives and ensure it reflects our shareholders’, customers’ and regulators’ interests. The members of the Remuneration Committee in 2015/16 were Nora Mead Brownell, Jonathan Dawson (chair), Paul Golby and Mark Williamson.

The Committee activities during the year

MeetingMain areas of discussion

April

2014/15 individual objectives scoring for Executive Committee

Discussion of 2015/16 objectives for Executive Committee
Review of Executive Committee shareholdings

Review of Committee terms of reference

May

Annual salary review and LTPP proposals for Executive Committee

2014/15 APP financial outturns and individual performance and confirmation of awards
Final approval of 2015/16 objectives for Executive Committee
Final approval of APP targets for 2015/16 financial year
Review of gender and ethnicity pay statistics

October

Approval of remuneration package for incoming CEO and of payments

  

on retirement for outgoing CEO

 

November

Update on corporate governance and disclosure issues and review of AGM outcomes

  

Directors’ Remuneration Report planning for 2016
Review of competitive benchmarking for secondary comparator groups
Review of gender and ethnicity pay statistics disclosure for external website

Update on 2015/16 APP and outstanding LTPPs

March

Approval of remuneration package for incoming Executive Director, UK

Benchmarking data review for Executive Committee remuneration
2016 Directors’ Remuneration Report – review of first draft
Discussion of metrics and targets for APP and LTPP for 2016/17

Review of objectives for Executive Committee for APP 2016/17

 

Service contracts and policy on payment for loss of office

In line with our policy, all Executive Directors have service contracts which are terminable by either party with 12 months’ notice.

The contracts contain provisions for payment in lieu of notice, at the sole and absolute discretion of the Company. Such payments are limited to payment of salary only for the remainder of the notice period. In the UK such payments would be phased on a monthly basis, over a period no greater than 12 months, and the Executive Director would be expected to mitigate any losses where employment is taken up during the notice period. In the US, for tax purposes the policy is to make any payment in lieu of notice as soon as reasonably practicable, and in any event within two and a half months of the later of 31 December and 31 March immediately following the notice date.

In the event of a UK Director being made redundant, statutory compensation would apply and the relevant pension plan rules may result in the early payment of an unreduced pension.

On termination of employment, no APP award would generally be payable and any DSP awards would generally lapse. However, the Committee has the discretion to deem an individual to be a ‘good leaver’, in which case an APP award would be payable on the termination date, based on performance during the financial year up to termination, and DSP awards would vest on the termination date. Examples of circumstances in which a Director would be treated as a ‘good leaver’ include redundancy, retirement, illness, injury, disability and death. Any APP award would be prorated and would be subject to performance achieved against the objectives for that year.

On termination of employment, outstanding awards under the share plans will be treated in accordance with the relevant plan rules approved by shareholders. Share awards would normally lapse. ‘Good leaver’ provisions apply at the Committee’s discretion and in specified circumstances, including redundancy, retirement, illness, injury, disability and death, where awards will be released to the departing Executive Director or, in the case of death, to their estate. Long-term share plan awards held by ‘good leavers’ may vest subject to performance measured at the normal vesting date and are prorated. Such awards would vest at the same time as for other participants.

The Chairman’s appointment is subject to six months’ notice by either party; for the other Non-executive Directors, notice is one month. No compensation is payable to Non-executive Directors if required to stand down.

Copies of Directors’ service contracts and letters of appointment are available to view at the Company’s registered office.

Dates of Directors’ service contracts/letters of appointment

Date of service contract/appointment

Executive Directors

Andrew Bonfield

1 November 2010

Steve Holliday

1 April 2006

John Pettigrew

1 April 2014

Dean Seavers

1 December 2014 (appointed as

Executive Director 1 April 2015)

Non-executive Directors

Nora Mead Brownell

1 June 2012

Jonathan Dawson

4 March 2013

Therese Esperdy

18 March 2014

Sir Peter Gershon

1 August 2011

Paul Golby

1 February 2012

Ruth Kelly

1 October 2011

Mark Williamson

3 September 2012

Please note that the information shown above is different to that contained in the approved policy as it has been updated to take account of Board departures and joiners during the year.

External appointments

The Executive Directors may, with the approval of the Board, accept one external appointment as a non-executive director of another company and retain any fees received for the appointment. Experience as a board member of another company is considered to be beneficial personal development, that in turn is of value to the Company.

LOGO

NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/1567


Corporate Governance

Directors’ Remuneration Reportcontinued

Total remuneration opportunity

The total remuneration for each of the Executive Directors that could result from the remuneration policy in 2015 under three different performance levels – below threshold (when only fixed pay is receivable), on target and maximum – is shown below.

Note that the information shown below is different to that contained in the approved policy as it has been updated to take account of Board departures and joiners during the year, and also to reflect the impact of the policy on 2015 remuneration, rather than 2014.

Andrew Bonfield£’000Steve Holliday£’000

LOGO

LOGO

John Pettigrew£’000Dean Seavers£’000

LOGO

LOGO

1.    ‘Fixed pay’ for Andrew Bonfield, Steve Holliday and John Pettigrew consists of salary, pension and benefits in kind as provided under the remuneration policy. ‘Fixed pay’ for Dean Seavers consists of salary, the part of his pension that is aligned with salary (see footnote 4 below) and benefits in kind as provided under the remuneration policy.

2.    Salary is that to be paid in 2015/16, taking account of the increases that will be effective from 1 June 2015 shown on page 74.

3.    Benefits in kind are as shown in the single total figure of remuneration table for 2014/15 on page 69, except for Dean Seavers for whom benefits in kind are assumed to be $37,000.

4.    Pension is as shown in the single total figure of remuneration table for 2014/15 on page 69, except for Andrew Bonfield for whom pension is shown as 30% of salary and Dean Seavers, for whom pension is shown as 13% of salary plus 13% of APP. This is made up of a 9% Core Plan contribution and a 4% Company match to his 401(k) plan. The element of Dean’s pension that is aligned with salary is shown within ‘Fixed pay’ and the element of his pension that is aligned with APP is shown within ‘APP’.

5.    APP calculations are based on 125% of salary for the period 1 April 2015 to 31 March 2016. For Dean Seavers, APP also includes the part of his pension that is aligned with APP (see footnote 4 above).

6.    LTPP calculations are based on awards with a face value at grant of 350% of 1 June 2015 salary for Steve Holliday and 300% of 1 June 2015 salary for all other Executive Directors. They, therefore, exclude future share price movement.

7.    LTPP and APP payout is 50% for on target performance and the maximum is 100% for achieving stretch performance.

8.    Dean Seaver’s remuneration opportunity has been converted at $1.58:£1.

Statement of consideration of shareholder views

The Committee considers all feedback received from shareholders throughout the year. While the Committee understands that not all shareholders’ views will be the same, we consult with our larger shareholders on a regular basis to understand their expectations with regard to executive remuneration issues and any changes in shareholder views in this regard. In 2013/14, we consulted larger shareholders on the proposed changes to remuneration policy. Shareholders were supportive of the direction of change proposed, particularly increasing holding periods for awards and retention thresholds. Several responses suggested a number of small changes and where possible the Committee reflected these changes in the proposals that were approved at the 2014 AGM.

        68


  

 

Annual report on remuneration

  

  Statement of implementation of remuneration policy in 2014/15  
  Role of Remuneration Committee  
  The Committee is responsible for recommending to the Board the remuneration policy for Executive Directors and the other members of the Executive Committee and for setting the remuneration policy for the Chairman. The aim is to align remuneration policy to Company strategy and key business objectives and ensure it reflects our shareholders’, customers’ and regulators’ interests.    
  

 

Members of the Committee

  

  

All members of the Committee are independent. Committee membership during the year and attendance at meetings is set out below:

 

   

  Member                         Attendance     
  

 

 
 

 

Jonathan Dawson

 6 of 6    
 

 

Nora Mead Brownell

  

 6 of 6    
 

 

Paul Golby

 6 of 6    
 

 

Mark Williamson

 6 of 6    
  

 

 
 

 

The Committee’s activities during the year

 

  

 MeetingMain areas of discussion  
  

 

 
 

 

April

 

Benchmarking data review for Executive Directors and Executive Committee members

Framework for the 2014/15 APP and 2014 LTPP

Executive Directors’ shareholdings

2014 Directors’ Remuneration Report

Terms of reference and code of conduct for advisors to the Committee

  

  

  

  

  

 

 

May

 

Annual salary review and LTPP proposals for Executive Directors and Executive Committee

2013/14 APP financial outturns and individual performance and confirmation of awards

APP targets for 2014/15 financial year

  

  

  

 

 

September

 

Remuneration package for new US Executive Director (Dean Seavers) and exit arrangements for incumbent (Tom King)

  

 

 

November

 

Update on corporate governance and disclosure issues and review of AGM outcome

Review of 2014 LTPP and 2014/15 APP metrics

  

  

 

 

February

 

Benchmarking data review for Executive Directors and Executive Committee remuneration

Framework for the 2015 LTPP

2015 Directors’ Remuneration Report

Committee evaluation

  

  

  

  

 

 

March

 

Metrics and targets for APP framework for 2015/16

Review of objectives for CEO and direct reports for APP 2015/16

  

  

  

 

 
 

 

Single total figure of remuneration – Executive Directors (audited information)

  

 

The following table shows a single total figure in respect of qualifying service for 2014/15, together with comparative figures for 2013/14:

 

   

    Salary Benefits in kind APP LTPP/PSP Pension Total 
    £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 
        2014/15 2013/14     2014/15 2013/14     2014/15 2013/14     2014/15 2013/14     2014/15 2013/14     2014/15   2013/14   
  

 

 
 

Andrew Bonfield

 727   712     58   55     854   790     1,300   1,418     218   214     3,157   3,189    
 

 

Steve Holliday

 1,021   1,000     40   35     1,210   1,169     2,051   2,179     523   418     4,845   4,801    
 

 

Tom King

 748   715     35   23     484   595     1,051   1,732     589   1,111     2,907   4,176    
 

 

John Pettigrew

 475   –     18   –     527   –     408   –     451   –     1,879   –    
 

 

Nick Winser

 182   546     5   12     205   704     693   1,177     85   212     1,170   2,651    
  

 

 
 

Total

 3,153   2,973     156   125     3,280   3,258     5,503   6,506     1,866   1,955     13,958   14,817    
  

 

 
 

1.  Base salaries were last increased on 1 June 2014. At this time Andrew Bonfield, Steve Holliday and Tom King all received salary increases of 2.5%, in line with the salary increase given to other employees of the Company. John Pettigrew joined the Board on 1 April 2014 and was not given a salary increase at 1 June 2014. Nick Winser was not given a salary increase at 1 June 2014, as he was stepping down from the Board at the 2014 AGM. Tom King’s annual salary was converted at $1.58:£1 in 2014/15 and $1.62:£1 in 2013/14.

       

 

2.  Benefits in kind include private medical insurance, life assurance, either a fully expensed car or a cash alternative to a car and the use of a driver when required. For Andrew Bonfield, Steve Holliday and John Pettigrew, it also includes the benefits of Sharesave options granted during the year. For Andrew Bonfield, a cash allowance in lieu of pension contributions is included within pension rather than benefits in kind.

       

 

3.  The APP value for 2013/14 is the full award before the 50% mandatory deferral into the DSP.

     

 

4.  A portion of the 2011 LTPP award vested in July 2014, with the remainder due to vest in July 2015. The above value is based on the share price (855 pence) on the vesting date (1 July 2014) for that portion that vested on 1 July 2014, and the average share price over the three months from 1 January 2015 to 31 March 2015 (899 pence) for that portion due to vest on 1 July 2015. In the prior year the 2010 PSP award vested and entered a retention period which ended in June 2014. The above valuation is based on the share price (744 pence) on the vesting date (1 July 2013).

        

 

5.  The pension figure for Tom King is based on his accrued benefit at date of leaving. Tom is required to take his benefit from age 55 (2016) and, under the provisions of the plan, his pension will be reduced for early payment.

      

 

6.  John Pettigrew was appointed to the Board on 1 April 2014, and hence his single total figure of remuneration for 2013/14 was £nil.

     

 

7.  Nick Winser stood down from the Board on 28 July 2014. His salary, benefits in kind and APP for 2014/15 shown above are prorated to reflect qualifying service between 1 April and 28 July 2014 during which time Nick was a member of the Board. The 2011 LTPP for 2014/15 shown above is not prorated, as this relates to the three-year period ended 30 June 2014, prior to Nick standing down from the Board. The 2011 LTPP only includes the EPS and TSR portion that vested during the year. The RoE portion is not included as Nick was not a Director at the end of the year. The RoE portion will be disclosed in the 2015/16 Remuneration Report under payments to past Directors. The pension for 2014/15 shown above represents pension earned by Nick over the full year to 31 March 2015, as required by BIS disclosure regulations.

 

         

LOGO

        NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/1569                                


Corporate Governance

Directors’ Remuneration Reportcontinued

  

 

Performance against targets for APP 2014/15 (audited information)

  

APP awards are earned by reference to the financial year and paid in June. The APP awards earned in 2014/15 were:

 

   

Financial measures

   Proportion
of max
achieved
 Proportion of salary
     Andrew Bonfield  Steve Holliday  Tom King  John Pettigrew  Nick Winser
  Target   Actual  Max  Actual    Max  Actual    Max  Actual    Max  Actual    Max  Actual  
  

 

 

Adjusted EPS (p/share)

54.7     60.6100%   43.75%   43.75%     43.75%   43.75%     43.75%   43.75%     43.75%   43.75%     43.75%  43.75%  
 

 

Group RoE (%)

11.2     11.8100% 43.75%   43.75%     43.75%   43.75%        –        –       –  
 

 

UK RoE (%)

13.7     14.383.33%    –        –        –     43.75%   36.46%     43.75%  36.46%  
 

 

US RoE (%)

9.0       8.40%    –        –     43.75%   0%        –       –  
 

 

Individual objectives

 

See below

 

 

 

37.5%

 

  

 

 

 

30%  

 

  

 

 

 

37.5%

 

  

 

 

 

31%  

 

  

 

 

 

37.5%

 

  

 

 

 

21%  

 

  

 

 

 

37.5%

 

  

 

 

 

30.8%  

 

  

 

 

 

37.5%

 

  

 

32.5%  

 

  

 

 

Totals

 125%   117.5%     125%   118.5%     125%   64.75%     125%   111.04%     125%  112.71%  
  

 

 

APP awarded

 £854,029     £1,209,687     £484,464     £527,440     £205,132  
  

 

 

 

1.  In relation to the financial measures, threshold, target and stretch performance pays out at 0%, 50% and 100% respectively and on a straight-line basis in between threshold  and target performance and target and stretch performance.

 

2.  Adjusted EPS is amended for the impact of timing and actuarial assumptions on pensions and OPEBs.

 

3.  The UK RoE comprises the reported 13.7% plus a discretionary adjustment of 60bps to include the benefit of a one-off legal settlement.

 

4.  Nick Winser’s APP award for 2014/15 is prorated to reflect the period between 1 April and 28 July 2014 when he was a member of the Board.

 

 

Individual objectives

The individual performance objectives of the Executive Directors and Executive Committee for 2014/15 were set by reference to the Company’s overall strategic priorities for the year including building on our strong safety performance; the drive for business growth in the UK and US; delivery of operational excellence and improvement in overall Company performance and service to customers; promotion of new ideas to work more efficiently and effectively; strengthening the talent pipeline and keeping all our people fully engaged; working with external stakeholders to shape energy policy and embed sustainability into our decision making to preserve natural resources and focus on environmental issues. Measureable levels of threshold, target and stretch performance are agreed, paying out at 0%, 50% and 100% respectively. The following table indicates the primary area of focus of the individual performance objectives of the Executive Directors for 2014/15, together with their overall performance against these objectives:

 

        

Andrew

Bonfield

   

Steve

Holliday

   

Tom

King

   

John

Pettigrew

   

Nick  

Winser  

  

 

 

 Safety

         ●  
 

 Business growth

  

         ●  
 

 Capability development

            ●  
 

 Stakeholder relations

         ●  
 

 Employee engagement

            ●  
 

 Financial strategy

   
 

 Operational excellence

            ●  
 

 Customer experience

      
 

 Group strategy

   
  

 

 

Proportion of maximum achieved:

 80%   82.7%   56%   82.2%  86.6%  
  

 

 

 

1.  The scoring for Nick Winser is for the period between 1 April and 28 July 2014 when he was a member of the Board.

 

 

2014/15 LTPP performance (audited information)

The LTPP value included in the 2014/15 single total figure relates to vesting of the conditional LTPP award granted in 2011. Part of the award – that dependent on performance over the three years ending 31 March 2014 for the EPS measure (50% weighting) and over the three years ending 30 June 2014 for the TSR measure (25% weighting) – vested on 1 July 2014. The remaining 25% weighting of the 2011 LTPP relates to the RoE measure. This is made up of the UK RoE measure for the UK Executive Directors, the US RoE measure for the US Executive Director and both the UK RoE measure and the US RoE measure in equal weightings for the CEO and Group Finance Director. The UK RoE measure is measured over the four years ending 31 March 2015 and the US RoE measure is measured over the four years ending 31 December 2014. However, the award does not vest until four years after the grant date, i.e. until 1 July 2015. The performance achieved against the performance targets, including the expected vesting percentage for the RoE measures, was:

 

Performance measureThreshold – 25% vesting

Maximum – 100% vesting

Actual/expected vesting

Actual/expected   

proportion of   

maximum achieved   

TSR ranking (25% weighting)

Ranked at median of the comparator group (FTSE 100)

7.5 percentage points or more above median7.33 percentage points above median98.3%  
Adjusted EPS (50% weighting)EPS growth exceeds RPI increase by 3 percentage pointsEPS growth exceeds RPI increase by 8 percentage points or moreExceeded RPI increase by 3.4 percentage points31.0%  

UK RoE (12.5% weighting for the CEO and Group Finance Director; 25% weighting for the UK Executive Director)

RoE is equal to the average allowed regulatory returnRoE is 2 percentage points or more above the average allowed regulatory returnExceeded average allowed regulatory return by 3.1 percentage points100%  
US RoE (12.5% weighting for the CEO and Group Finance Director; 25% weighting for the US Executive Director)RoE is 1 percentage point below the average allowed regulatory returnRoE is 1 percentage point or more above the average allowed regulatory return0.98 percentage points below the average allowed regulatory return25.9%  

       70


   

The amounts vesting under the 2011 LTPP during the year and included in the 2014/15 single total figure are as follows:

 

       Original number of share 
awards in 2011 LTPP 
 Overall vesting percentage 
(including expected vesting 
percentage for RoE measure)
 

  Number of awards vesting 
(including expected 

vesting for RoE measure)

        Dividend equivalent 
shares 
 

Total value of awards vesting   
(including expected vesting   
for RoE  measure) and dividend   
equivalent shares (£’000)  

  

 

 

Andrew Bonfield

229,463 55.81% 

128,063 

21,722 

1,300  

 

 

Steve Holliday

362,148 55.81% 

202,115 

34,284 

2,051  

 

 

Tom King

45,537 (ADSs)46.55% 

21,196 (ADSs)

2,881 (ADSs)

1,051  

 

 

John Pettigrew

61,212 65.07% 

39,832 

6,951 

408  

 

 

Nick Winser

174,986 53.43% 

70,121 

10,949 

693  

  

 

 1. The above valuation is based on the share price (855 pence:$68.47) on the vesting date (1 July 2014) for the EPS and TSR elements of the award, and the average share price over the three months from 1 January 2015 to 31 March 2015 (899 pence:$70.33) for the RoE element of the award. The valuation for Tom King is converted at $1.58:£1.
 2. Tom King’s awards are over ADSs and each ADS represents five ordinary shares.
 3. For Nick Winser, the valuation excludes the RoE element of the award.
 

 

Total pension benefits (audited information)

The table below provides details of the Executive Directors’ pension benefits:

 

    Total
contributions
to DC-type
pension plan
£’000
  Cash in lieu of
  contributions
to DC-type
pension plan
£’000

Accrued

  DB-type pension
  at 31 March 2015
£’000 pa

Increase

in accrued
DB-type pension
over year

£’000 pa

Reduction

in salary

due to FPS

£’000

Increase/

(decrease)
in any lump sum 

£’000 

Value of
pension benefit
calculated using
BIS methodology
£’000

Normal  
retirement  

date  

  

 

 

Andrew Bonfield

218– 21817/08/2027  
 

 

Steve Holliday

546296152326/10/2016  
 

 

Tom King

858129– 58901/01/2027  
 

 

John Pettigrew

143212863 45126/10/2031  
 

 

Nick Winser

297627(6)8506/09/2020  
  

 

 1. The UK-based Executive Directors participate in FPS, a salary sacrifice arrangement. Under FPS, the individual’s salary is reduced by an amount equal to the employee pension contribution that would have been paid into the scheme. An equivalent contribution is paid into the scheme by the employer.
 2. For Steve Holliday, in addition to the accrued DB-type pension at 31 March 2015 above, there is an accrued lump sum entitlement of £127,000 as at 31 March 2015. The increase to the accumulated lump sum, net of inflation, was £1,000 in the year to 31 March 2015.
 3. For Nick Winser, in addition to the accrued DB-type pension at 31 March 2015 above, there is an accrued lump sum entitlement of £316,000 as at 31 March 2015. The accumulated lump sum reduced by £6,000 in the year to 31 March 2015, after allowing for inflation.
 4. For John Pettigrew, in addition to the accrued DB-type pension at 31 March 2015 above, there is an accrued lump sum entitlement of £428,000 as at 31 March 2015. The increase to the accumulated lump sum net of inflation was £63,000 in the year to 31 March 2015.
 5. For Tom King, the exchange rate as at 31 March 2015 was $1.49:£1 and as at 31 March 2014 was $1.67:£1. Through Tom King’s participation in the 401(k) plan in the US (a DC arrangement) the Company made contributions worth £8,076.
 6. For Steve Holliday, John Pettigrew and Nick Winser, the increase in accrued DB-type pension over the year shown above is net of inflation, as UK pensions in payment or deferment increase in line with inflation. For Tom King, the increase in accrued DB-type pension over the year shown above does not allow for inflation, as US pensions in payment or deferment do not increase in line with inflation.
 7. In accordance with BIS methodology, the pension benefit for Andrew Bonfield is calculated as the aggregate of contributions made to a DC-type pension plan (£nil) and cash in lieu of contributions to a DC-type pension plan (£218,000). In accordance with BIS disclosure regulations, the pension benefit for Steve Holliday, Tom King, John Pettigrew and Nick Winser is calculated as the increase in accrued DB-type pension over the year shown above multiplied by 20 plus the increase or less the decrease in the lump sum shown above, less the reduction in salary due to FPS plus total contributions made to DC-type pension plans. Each element is calculated separately and rounded to produce the numbers in the table above.
 8. There are no additional benefits in the event of early retirement.
 

 

Single total figure of remuneration – Non-executive Directors (audited information)

The following table shows a single total figure in respect of qualifying service for 2014/15, together with comparative figures for 2013/14:

 

      

Fees

£’000

Other emoluments

£’000

Total

£’000

      2014/15 2013/14  2014/152013/14  2014/152013/14  
  

 

 

Philip Aiken

8488  –  8488  
 

 

Nora Mead Brownell

9188  –  9188  
 

 

Jonathan Dawson

9684  –  9684  
 

 

Therese Esperdy

913  –  913  
 

 

Sir Peter Gershon

488475  1617  504492  
 

 

Paul Golby

8176  –  8176  
 

 

Ruth Kelly

7976  –  7976  
 

 

Maria Richter

33101  –  33101  
 

 

Mark Williamson

11899  –  11899  
  

 

 

Total

1,1611,090  1617  1,1771,107  
  

 

 1. Sir Peter Gershon’s other emoluments comprise private medical insurance, cash in lieu of a car and the use of a driver when required.
 

 

LTPP (conditional award) granted during the financial year (audited information)

 

  

LTPP

  

Basis of award        

Face value    

’000    

Proportion vesting

at threshold
performance

    Number of shares Performance  
    period end date  
  

 

 

Andrew Bonfield

300% of salary        

£2,189    

20%248,470 June 2017  
 

 

Steve Holliday

350% of salary        

£3,588    

20%407,138 June 2017  
 

 

Tom King

300% of salary        

$3,561    

20%47,668 (ADSs)June 2017  
 

 

John Pettigrew

300% of salary        

£1,425    

20%161,720 June 2017  
 

 

Nick Winser

0% of salary        

£nil    

n/an/a n/a  
  

 

 1. The face value of the awards is calculated using the share price at the date of grant (29 July 2014) (£8.8115 per share and $74.7032 per ADS).

LOGO

        NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/1571                                


Corporate Governance

Directors’ Remuneration Reportcontinued

  

 

Performance conditions for LTPP awards granted during the financial year (audited information)

 

     Weighting Conditional share awards granted – 2014
   

 

 

 

  Performance measure    Andrew Bonfield    Steve HollidayTom King  John Pettigrew  Threshold – 20% vestingMaximum – 100% vesting
  

 

 

 

Group RoE

 

50%

 

50%

 

25%

 

25%

 

11.0%

 

12.5% or more

 

 

UK RoE

 

25%

 

1 percentage point above the average allowed regulatory return

 

3.5 percentage points or more above the average allowed regulatory return

 

 

US RoE

 

25%

 

90% of the average allowed regulatory return

 

105% or more of the average allowed regulatory return

 

 

Value growth

 

 

50%

 

50%

 

50%

 

50%

 

10.0%

 

12.0% or more

  

 

 

 

DSP (conditional award) granted during the financial year (audited information)

The 2014 award (granted 17 June 2014) is the final DSP award that will be made and relates to the 2013/14 award made under the previous remuneration policy.

 

  DSP  Basis of award                   Face value ’000Number of shares              Release date  
  

 

 

 

Andrew Bonfield

 

50% of APP value     

 

£395

 

47,048            

 

17 June 2017  

 

 

Steve Holliday

 

50% of APP value     

 

£585

 

69,653            

 

17 June 2017  

 

 

Tom King

 

50% of APP value     

 

$482

 

6,566 (ADSs)           

 

17 June 2017  

 

 

John Pettigrew

 

33% of APP value     

 

£120

 

14,350            

 

17 June 2017  

 

 

Nick Winser

 

 

50% of APP value     

 

 

£352

 

 

41,924            

 

 

17 June 2017  

 

  

 

 

1.  The face value of the awards is calculated using the share price at the date of grant (17 June 2014) (£8.3922 per share and $73.4150 per ADS).

2.  The award made in 2014/15 is 50% of the 2013/14 APP value except for John Pettigrew.

3.  The award made in 2014/15 for John Pettigrew is 33% of the 2013/14 APP value to reflect his terms before his appointment to the Board on 1 April 2014.

 

 

Conditions for DSP awards granted during the financial year

DSP awards are subject only to continuous employment.

 

Payments for loss of office (audited information)

Payments made to Directors for loss of office during 2014/15 were as follows:

 

DescriptionAmount

 

Single total figure of remuneration – Executive Directors (audited information)

Tom King

PaymentThe following table shows a single total figure in lieurespect of notice.

$692,388 paid in April 2015.

qualifying service for 2015/16, together with comparative figures for 2014/15:

Remuneration Committee exercised its discretion to award ‘good leaver’ status for outstanding 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014 LTPP awards and DSP awards.

                               
    

Salary

£’000

   

Benefits in kind

£’000

   APP
£’000
   LTPP
£’000
   Pension
£’000
   Other
£’000
   

 

           Total 

           £’000                  

   

 

 

   

 

 

                    
     2015/16   2014/15     2015/16   2014/15     2015/16   2014/15    2015/16   2014/15     2015/16   2014/15     2015/16   2014/15     2015/16   2014/15

 

Andrew Bonfield

   736     727      61     58      865     854      1,345     1,271      221     218           –      3,228    3,128

Steve Holliday

   1,033     1,021      41     40      1,222     1,210      2,125     2,004      730     523           –      5,151    4,798

John Pettigrew

   503     475      14     18      503     527      406     396      143     451           –      1,569    1,867

Dean Seavers

   678     –      39     –      649     –           –      148     –      170     –      1,684    

 

Total

   2,950     2,223      155     116      3,239     2,591      3,876     3,671      1,242     1,192      170     –      11,632    9,793

 

                              

Notes:

Salary: Base salaries were last increased on 1 June 2015. At this time Andrew Bonfield and Steve Holliday received salary increases of approximately 1%, in line with the salary increases given to other managerial employees of the Company in the UK. John Pettigrew was given an increase of 7% to move closer towards market as Executive Director, UK in 2015/16. Dean Seavers joined the Board on 1 April 2015 and was not given a salary increase at 1 June 2015, in line with other managerial employees of the Company in the US. Dean Seavers’ base salary has been converted at $1.4744:£1 for 2015/16.

Benefits in kind: Benefits in kind include private medical insurance, life assurance, and for UK Executive Directors, either a fully expensed car or a cash alternative to a car and the use of a driver when required. For Andrew Bonfield, it also includes the benefits of Sharesave options granted during the year. For Dean Seavers, this amount includes relocation payments.

Other:For Dean Seavers, Other includes the second $250,000 cash payment for forfeited bonuses from his former employer.

LTPP: A portion of the 2012 LTPP award vested in July 2015, and the remainder is due to vest in July 2016. The above value for 2015/16 is based on the share price (818 pence) on the vesting date (1 July 2015) for that portion that vested on 1 July 2015, and the average share price over the three months from 1 January 2016 to 31 March 2016 (958 pence) for that portion due to vest on 1 July 2016. The 2014/15 LTPP amount has been restated to reflect the actual amounts vested on 1 July 2015 for RoE, rather than the estimate shown in last year’s Annual Report. Due to a lower share price at vesting of 818 pence ($64.17 per ADS) versus the estimate of 899 pence ($70.33 per ADS), the actual value at vesting was £29,358, £46,335, and £12,441 lower than the estimate for Andrew Bonfield, Steve Holliday and John Pettigrew respectively.

 

Date of leaving: 31 March 2015.

86,043 awards remain outstanding, having been prorated for time served during the performance period (LTPP awards: 2011: 11,385; 2012: 40,200; 2013: 22,542; 2014: 11,916). Awards remain subject to performance conditions, measured at normal performance measurement date.

DSP awards vest on the termination date (DSP awards: 2012: 11,332 (ADSs); 2013: 7,119 (ADSs); 2014: 6,566 (ADSs)).

 

Nick Winser

Statutory redundancy payment.

£11,925 payable in August 2015.

Remuneration Committee exercised its discretion to award ‘good leaver’ status for outstanding 2011, 2012National Grid Annual Report and 2013 LTPP awards and DSP awards.

295,047 awards remain outstanding, having been prorated for time served during performance period (LTPP awards: 2011: 43,746; 2012: 154,049; 2013: 97,252). Awards remain subject to performance conditions, measured at normal performance measurement date. DSP awards vest on the termination date (DSP awards: 2012: 39,682; 2013: 33,741; 2014: 41,924).

Immediate payment of accrued pension benefits from date of leaving.

In accordance with the scheme rules, and as for all scheme members, there is no enhancement to or reduction of the accrued benefits for redundancy leavers.

Option to exchange pension for lump sum payable at date of leaving.

Stepped down from the Board at 2014 AGM on 28 July 2014.

Date of leaving: 31 July 2015.

£715,000 lump sum payable in August 2015.

£24,000 residual pension payable monthly from 1 August 2015 increasing annually with inflation.

The lump sum and residual pension figures are subject to final member option confirmation and may vary depending on the changes in inflation at date of leaving.

Accounts 2015/16 

Annual report on remuneration
 75

Payments to past Directors (audited information)

There were no payments made to past Directors during 2014/15.


Corporate Governancecontinued

Annual report on remunerationcontinued

Performance against targets for APP 2015/16 (audited information)

APP awards are earned by reference to the financial year and paid in June. Fifty percent of awards are paid in shares which (after any sales to pay tax) must be retained until the shareholding requirement is met, and in any event for two years after receipt. In relation to both the financial measures and individual objectives, threshold, target and stretch performance levels are pre-determined and pay out at 0%, 50% and 100% respectively and on a straight-line basis in between threshold and target performance and target and stretch performance. Individual objectives of the Executive Directors reflect the primary focus areas within the Company’s overall strategic priorities:

 

Shareholder dilution

Where shares may be issued or treasury shares reissued
building on our strong safety performance;
the drive for business growth in the UK and US;
delivery of operational excellence and improvement in overall Company performance and service to satisfy incentives,customers;
promotion of innovative ideas to work more efficiently and effectively;
strengthening the aggregate dilution resulting from executive share-based incentives will not exceed 5% in any 10 year period. Dilution resulting fromtalent pipeline and keeping all incentives, including all-employee incentives, will not exceed 10% in any 10 year period. The Committee reviews dilution against these limits regularlyour employees fully engaged; and under these limits
working with external stakeholders to shape energy policy and embed sustainability into our decision-making to preserve natural resources and focus on environmental issues.

The outcomes of APP awards earned in 2015/16, along with detail of individual objectives, are shown in the figures below:

   Proportion
of max
opportunity
  Threshold  Target  Stretch  Actual  

Proportion
of max

achieved

 

Adjusted EPS (p/share)

  35%    56.2    59.2    62.2    62.3    100%  

 

Group RoE (%)

   11.2    11.6    12.0    12.0    100%  

��

UK RoE (%)

  35%     13.25     13.3    55%  

 

US RoE (%)

    8.25     8.25    50%  

 

Individual objectives

  30%            See adjacent table    80–86%  

Notes:

Overall: Group RoE pertains to the CEO and Finance Director, whilst UK RoE and US RoE pertain to the Executive Director, UK and Executive Director, US, respectively. RoE in some form comprises 35% of the total maximum APP opportunity.

Adjusted EPS: Adjusted EPS actual is reduced by 1.2 pence to account for the impact of timing, absence of a budgeted rise in the UK corporate tax rate, and the impact of scrip dividend uptake and currency adjustments.

Group RoE: Group RoE actual is reduced by 30 basis points to account for the absence of a budgeted rise in the UK corporate tax rate.

US RoE: US RoE actual is adjusted to capture half of the realised gains achieved from the exchange of National Grid USA’s share in the Iroquois pipeline joint venture.

   Andrew  Steve  John  Dean 
    Bonfield  Holliday  Pettigrew  Seavers 

Safety

        ● 

Group strategy

        

Financial strategy

        

Business growth

        ● 

Operational excellence

        ● 

Customer experience

        ● 

Employee engagement

        ● 

Capability development

        ● 

Stakeholder relations

         ● 
Proportion of maximum achieved  80%  82%  86%  80% 

2015/16 APP as proportion of base salary

LOGO

2015/16 LTPP performance (audited information)

The LTPP value included in the 2015/16 single total figure relates to vesting of the conditional LTPP award granted in 2012. The 2012 award is determined based on differing performance periods and vesting dates:

performance over the Company, as atthree years ending 31 March 2015 had headroom of 4.12%for the EPS measure (50% weighting), which vested on 1 July 2015;
performance over the three years ending 30 June 2015 for the TSR measure (25% weighting), which vested on 1 July 2015; and 7.95% respectively.

Statement of Directors’ shareholdings and share interests (audited information)

The Executive Directors are required to build up and hold a shareholding from vested share plan awards. Deferred share plan awards are not taken into account for these purposes until

performance over the end of the deferral period. Shares are valued for these purposes at thefour years ending 31 March 2016 for the UK RoE measure and 31 December 2015 price, which was 865 pence per share ($64.61 per ADS) except for Nick Winser whose shares are valued at the 28 July 2014 share price of 879 pence per share.

The following table shows how eachUS RoE measure (25% weighting overall, split by Executive Director complies with the shareholding requirement and also the number of shares owned by the Non-executive Directors, including connected persons. For Philip Aiken, Maria Richter and Nick Winser, the shareholding is as at the date they stepped down from the Board. For all others it is as at 31 March 2015.

shown overleaf), which will vest on 1 July 2016.

 

       7276National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Corporate Governance 


 

 

   Corporate Governance

 

 

    

    

   Directors Share ownership 
requirements 
(multiple of salary)
  Number of shares 
owned outright 
(including connected 
persons)
  Number of shares
held as a multiple
of current salary
  Number of options
granted under the
Sharesave Plan
  Conditional share 
awards subject 
to performance 
conditions 
(LTPP 2011, 2012, 
2013 and 2014)
  

Conditional share  
awards subject to  
continuous  
employment  

(DSP 2012, 2013  

and 2014) 

 
  

 

 
 

 

Executive Directors

 

 

Andrew Bonfield

 400%    172,166    204%   5,443   713,728    147,904    
 

 

Steve Holliday

 500%    1,086,725    917%   3,524   1,142,170    202,704    
 

 

Tom King

 400%    111,610    608%      144,894    25,017    
 

 

John Pettigrew

 400%    138,562    252%   5,994   292,779    40,370    
 

 

Nick Winser

 

 

 

 

 

400% 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

506,519 

 

 

  

 

 

 

815%

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

356,540 

 

  

 

 

 

115,347  

 

  

 

  

 

 
 

 

Non-executive Directors

 

 

 

Philip Aiken

 –    4,900    n/a      –    –    
 

 

Nora Mead Brownell

 –    5,000    n/a      –    –    
 

 

Jonathan Dawson

 –    25,179    n/a      –    –    
 

 

Therese Esperdy

 –       n/a      –    –    
 

 

Sir Peter Gershon

 –    79,450    n/a      –    –    
 

 

Paul Golby

 –    2,500    n/a      –    –    
 

 

Ruth Kelly

 –    800    n/a      –    –    
 

 

Maria Richter

 –    14,357    n/a      –    –    
 

 

Mark Williamson

 

 

 

 

 

– 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

4,726 

 

 

  

 

 

 

n/a

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

– 

 

  

 

 

 

–  

 

  

 

  

 

 
 

 

1.    The salary used to calculate the value of shareholding is the gross annual salary as at 31 March 2015, except for Nick Winser whose calculation is made on gross annual salary as at 28 July 2014.

        

 

2.    Andrew Bonfield and John Pettigrew have not yet met the increased shareholding requirement. They are expected to reach the required shareholding in 2017 and 2018 respectively.

        

 

3.    Tom King’s holdings and awards are shown as ADSs and each ADS represents five ordinary shares.

       

 

4.    On 31 March 2015 Andrew Bonfield held 5,443 options granted under the Sharesave plan. 3,421 options were granted at a value of 445 pence per share, and they can be exercised at 445 pence per share between April 2016 and September 2016. 2,022 options were granted at a value of 749 pence per share and they can be exercised at 749 pence per share between April 2020 and September 2020.

         

 

5.    On 31 March 2015 Steve Holliday held 3,524 options granted under the Sharesave plan. 1,502 options were granted at a value of 599 pence per share, and they can be exercised at 599 pence per share between April 2017 and September 2017. 2,022 options were granted at a value of 749 pence per share and they can be exercised at 749 pence per share between April 2020 and September 2020.

         

 

6.    On 31 March 2015 John Pettigrew held 5,994 options granted under the Sharesave plan. 1,252 options were granted at a value of 599 pence per share, and they can be exercised at 599 pence per share between April 2019 and September 2019. 3,034 options were granted at a value of 749 pence per share and they can be exercised at 749 pence per share between April 2020 and September 2020. On 1 April 2015, he exercised a Sharesave option over 1,708 shares at the option price of 455.06 pence per share for expiration in September 2015 at a gain of £6,997.

          

 

7.    For Andrew Bonfield, the number of conditional share awards subject to performance conditions is as follows: LTPP 2011: 57,365; LTPP 2012: 213,095; LTPP 2013: 194,798; LTPP 2014: 248,470. The number of conditional share awards subject to continuous employment is as follows: DSP 2012: 55,150; DSP 2013: 45,706; DSP 2014: 47,048.

        

 

8.    For Steve Holliday, the number of conditional share awards subject to performance conditions is as follows: LTPP 2011: 90,537; LTPP 2012: 336,702; LTPP 2013: 307,793; LTPP 2014: 407,138. The number of conditional share awards subject to continuous employment is as follows: DSP 2012: 75,933; DSP 2013: 57,118; DSP 2014: 69,653.

        

 

9.    For Tom King, the number of conditional awards over ADSs subject to performance conditions is as follows: LTPP 2011: 11,385; LTPP 2012: 44,616; LTPP 2013: 41,225; LTPP 2014: 47,668. The number of conditional awards over ADSs subject to continuous employment is as follows: DSP 2012: 11,332; DSP 2013: 7,119; DSP 2014: 6,566.

        

 

10.  For John Pettigrew, the number of conditional share awards subject to performance conditions is as follows: LTPP 2011: 15,303; LTPP 2012: 52,395; LTPP 2013: 63,361; LTPP 2014: 161,720. The number of conditional share awards subject to continuous employment is as follows: DSP 2012: 11,679; DSP 2013: 14,341; DSP 2014: 14,350.

      

 

11.  For Nick Winser, the number of conditional share awards subject to performance conditions is as follows: LTPP 2011: 43,746; LTPP 2012: 163,412; LTPP 2013: 149,382. The number of conditional share awards subject to continuous employment is as follows: DSP 2012: 39,682; DSP 2013: 33,741; DSP 2014: 41,924.

      

 

12.  The normal vesting dates for the conditional share awards subject to performance conditions are 1 July 2015; 1 July 2015 and 1 July 2016; 1 July 2016 and 1 July 2017; and 1 July 2017 for the LTPP 2011, LTPP 2012, LTPP 2013 and LTPP 2014 respectively. The normal vesting dates for the conditional share awards subject to continuous employment are 14 June 2015, 13 June 2016 and 17 June 2017 for the DSP 2012, DSP 2013 and DSP 2014 respectively.

       

 

13.  Non-executive Directors do not have a shareholding requirement.

     

 

14.  In April and May 2015 a further 35 shares were purchased on behalf of Steve Holliday and a further 34 shares on behalf of Andrew Bonfield and John Pettigrew via the Share Incentive Plan (an HMRC approved all-employee share plan), thereby increasing their beneficial interests. There have been no other changes in Directors’ shareholdings between 1 April 2015 and 20 May 2015.

       

 

 

External appointments and retention of fees

  

 

The table below details the Executive Directors who served as non-executive directors in other companies during the year ended 31 March 2015:

 

   

           Company                      Retained fees (£)  
  

 

 
 

 

Andrew Bonfield

 Kingfisher plc                         82,400    
 

 

Steve Holliday

 Marks and Spencer Group plc                         22,900    
 

 

Nick Winser

 

 Kier Group plc                         18,200    
  

 

 
 

1.    Fees for Steve Holliday relate to the period from 1 April to 8 July 2014 when he stepped down from the Marks and Spencer Group plc Board.

       

 

2.    Fees for Nick Winser relate to the period from 1 April to 28 July 2014 when he stepped down from the National Grid Board at the 2014 AGM.

       

 

 

Relative importance of spend on pay

This chart shows the relative importance of spend on pay compared with other costs and disbursements (dividends, tax, net interest and capital expenditure). Given the capital-intensive nature of our business and the scale of our operations, these costs were chosen as the most relevant for comparison purposes. All amounts exclude exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries.

  

       

 

 

 

LOGO  

 

  

    

LOGO

The performance achieved against the targets, including the expected vesting percentage for the RoE measures, was:

 

        NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15Performance measure  73                                Threshold – 25% vestingMaximum – 100% vestingActual/expected vesting

Actual/expected  

proportion of  

maximum achieved  

TSR ranking (25% weighting)

Ranked at median of the comparator group (FTSE 100)

7.5 percentage points or more above median

2.99 percentage points above median

55.0%  

Adjusted EPS (50% weighting)

EPS growth exceeds RPI increase by 3 percentage points

EPS growth exceeds RPI increase by 8 percentage points or more

Exceeded RPI increase by 6.3 percentage points

74.4%  

UK RoE (12.5% weighting for the CEO and Finance Director; 25% weighting for the Executive Director, UK)

RoE is equal to the average allowed regulatory return

RoE is 2 percentage points or more above the average allowed regulatory return

Exceeded average allowed regulatory return by 3.2 percentage points

100.0%  

US RoE (12.5% weighting for the CEO and Finance Director; 25% weighting for the former Executive Director, US)

RoE is 1 percentage point below the average allowed regulatory return

RoE is 1 percentage point or more above the average allowed regulatory return

1.1 percentage points below the average allowed regulatory return

0%  

The amounts vesting under the 2012 LTPP during the year and included in the 2015/16 single total figure are shown in the table below.

The valuation is based on the following share prices:

818 pence ($64.17 per ADS) on the vesting date of 1 July 2015 for the EPS and TSR elements of the award; and
average share price over the three months from 1 January 2016 to 31 March 2016 of 958 pence ($69.23 per ADS) for the RoE element of the award.

    Original number
of share awards
in 2012 LTPP
   Overall vesting
percentage (including
expected vesting
percentage for RoE
measure)
  

Number of awards
vesting (including
expected

vesting for RoE
measure)

   

Dividend

equivalent

shares

   

Total value of awards
vesting (including
expected vesting for RoE
measure) and  dividend
equivalent shares

(£’000)

 

 

Andrew Bonfield

   213,095     63.45%    135,203     23,787     1,345  

 

Steve Holliday

   336,702     63.45%    213,628     37,586     2,125  

 

John Pettigrew

   52,395     75.95%    39,793     7,136     406  

 

Dean Seavers

                        

Last year’s Directors’ Remuneration Report covering remuneration for 2014/15 included an estimated vesting of the US and UK RoE portions of the 2011 LTPP award. These awards vested on 1 July 2015 and the performance achieved against the performance targets was the same as the expected vesting disclosed in the 2014/15 report. As a result of the actual achievement against the performance targets being the same as estimated, the vesting percentage and number of awards vesting are the same as disclosed in the 2014/15 report. However, the actual number of dividend equivalent shares varied as did the total value of awards vesting due to share price changes between the estimate and the actual date of vesting of the RoE portion. Specifically, the actual price on 1 July 2015 was 818 pence ($64.17 per ADS) rather than the estimate of 899 pence ($70.33 per ADS) disclosed in the 2014/15 report based on the average price from 1 January 2015 to 31 March 2015. As a result, the actual numbers of dividend equivalent shares granted for the 2011 LTPP were 22,454, 35,440 and 7,261 and the actual values of the awards at vesting were £29,358, £46,335 and £12,441 lower than originally estimated for Andrew Bonfield, Steve Holliday and John Pettigrew respectively.

Total pension benefits (audited information)

The table below provides details of the Executive Directors’ pension benefits. Steve Holliday and John Pettigrew participate in a Defined Benefit pension plan, whilst Andrew Bonfield receives cash in lieu of participation in a pension plan, and Dean Seavers participates in a Defined Contribution arrangement. The UK-based Executive Directors in a Defined Benefit pension participate in a salary sacrifice arrangement (FPS), under which the individual’s salary is reduced by an amount equal to the employee pension contribution that would have been paid into the scheme. An equivalent contribution is paid into the scheme by the employer. There are no additional benefits in the event of early retirement.

    Total
contributions
to DC
arrangement
£’000
   Cash in lieu of
pension
contributions
£’000
   Accrued
DB pension
at 31 March 2016
£’000 pa
   Increase
in accrued
DB pension
over year
£’000 pa
   

Reduction
in salary
due to FPS

£’000

   

Increase/
(decrease) in
any lump sum

£’000

   

Value of

pension benefit
calculated using
BIS methodology

£’000

   

Normal
retirement

date

 

 

Andrew Bonfield

        221                         221     17/08/2027  

 

Steve Holliday

             591     39     62     2     730     26/10/2016  

 

John Pettigrew

             151     7     29     23     143     26/10/2031  

 

Dean Seavers

   148                              148     30/08/2025  

Notes:

Steve Holliday: In addition to the accrued DB pension at 31 March 2016 above, there is an accrued lump sum entitlement of £129,000 as at 31 March 2016. The increase to the accumulated lump sum, net of inflation, was £2,000 in the year to 31 March 2016. The increase in accrued DB pension over the year shown above is net of inflation, as UK pensions in payment or deferment increase in line with inflation.

John Pettigrew: In addition to the accrued DB pension at 31 March 2016 above, there is an accrued lump sum entitlement of £452,000 as at 31 March 2016. The increase to the accumulated lump sum, net of inflation, was £23,000 in the year to 31 March 2016. The increase in accrued DB pension over the year shown above is net of inflation, as UK pensions in payment or deferment increase in line with inflation.

Dean Seavers: The average exchange rate for 2015/16 was $1.4744:£1. Through his participation in the 401(k) plan in the US (a DC arrangement) the Company made contributions worth £27,400. The Company also made contributions worth £121,049 to the Non-Qualified Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan which pays the portion of core contributions that cannot be paid under the qualified plan due to IRS limitations. The plan also provides a supplemental top-up benefit through additional company contributions to yield an overall company contribution of 9% of pensionable pay, including both the qualified and non-qualified plan benefits. The retirement date shown is the typical retirement age in the US. The 401(k) plan does not have a retirement age. Benefits can be taken without penalty on leaving the Company from age 55 (subject to vesting requirements) or can be rolled over into another qualifying plan.

BIS calculation: In accordance with BIS methodology, the pension benefit for Andrew Bonfield and Dean Seavers is calculated as the aggregate of contributions made to a DC arrangement and cash in lieu of pension contributions. Also in accordance with BIS methodology, the pension benefit for Steve Holliday and John Pettigrew is calculated as the increase in accrued DB pension over the year shown above multiplied by 20 plus the increase in the lump sum shown above, less the reduction in salary due to FPS. Each element is calculated separately and rounded to produce the numbers in the table above.

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Annual report on remuneration77


Corporate Governancecontinued

Annual report on remunerationcontinued

Single total figure of remuneration – Non-executive Directors (audited information)

The following table shows a single total figure in respect of qualifying service for 2015/16, together with comparative figures for 2014/15:

   

Fees

£’000

  

Other emoluments

£’000

  

Total

£’000

 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
                   2015/16         2014/15                   2015/16       2014/15                   2015/16         2014/15   

 

 

  Nora Mead Brownell

   94       91            –     94       91    

  Jonathan Dawson

   99       96            –     99       96    

  Therese Esperdy

   128       91            –     128       91    

  Sir Peter Gershon

   494       488     15       16     509       504    

  Paul Golby

   103       81            –     103       81    

  Ruth Kelly

   82       79            –     82       79    

  Mark Williamson

   121       118            –     121       118    

 

 

  Total

   1,121       1,044     15       16     1,136       1,060    

 

 

Therese Esperdy: Fees for 2015/16 include £22,917 in fees for serving on the National Grid USA Board.

Sir Peter Gershon: Other emoluments comprise private medical insurance, cash in lieu of a car and the use of a driver when required.

In accordance with the Company’s expenses policies, Non-executive Directors receive reimbursement for their reasonable expenses for attending Board meetings. In instances where those costs are treated by HMRC as taxable benefits, the Company also meets the associated tax cost to the Non-executive Directors through a PAYE settlement agreement with HMRC.

The total emoluments paid to Executive and Non-executive Directors in the year was £13 million (2014/15: £15 million).

LTPP (conditional award) granted during the financial year (audited information)

The face value of the awards is calculated using the volume-average weighted share price at the date of grant (25 June 2015) (£8.5147 per share and $66.9618 per ADS).

LTPP  Basis of award     Face value ’000     Proportion vesting at
threshold performance
     Number of shares     Performance  
period end date  
 

 

 

Andrew Bonfield

   300% of salary       £2,211       20%       259,668       June 2018    

Steve Holliday

   350% of salary       £3,622       20%       425,440       June 2018    

John Pettigrew

   300% of salary       £1,525       20%       179,072       June 2018    

Dean Seavers

   300% of salary       $3,000       20%       44,801 (ADSs)       June 2018    

 

 

Performance conditions for LTPP awards granted during the financial year (audited information)

   Weighting   Conditional share awards granted – 2015 
Performance measure          Andrew Bonfield       Steve Holliday     John Pettigrew     Dean Seavers    Threshold – 20% vesting   Maximum – 100% vesting   

 

 

Group RoE

   50%     50%     25%     25%      11.0%     12.5% or more    

UK RoE

       25%       
 
 
1 percentage point
above the average
allowed regulatory return
  
  
  
   
 
 
3.5 percentage points or  
more above the average  
allowed regulatory return  
  
  
  

 

US RoE

        

 

 

 

25% 

 

  

  

 

 
 

 

90% of the average
allowed regulatory return

 

  
  

  

 

 
 
 

 

105% or more of the  
average allowed  
regulatory return  

 

  
  
  

 

Value growth

  

 

 

 

50%

 

  

  

 

 

 

50%

 

  

  

 

 

 

50%

 

  

  

 

 

 

50% 

 

  

  

 

 

 

10.0%

 

  

  

 

 

 

12.0% or more  

 

  

 

 

Payments for loss of office (audited information)

There were no payments made for loss of office during 2015/16.

Payments to past Directors (audited information)

Nick Winser stepped down from the Board at the 2014 AGM and left the Company on 31 July 2015. Tom King stepped down from the Board and left the Company on 31 March 2015. Mr Winser and Mr King held awards over shares and ADSs, respectively, which were pro-rated according to their departure date. The vesting of all these awards will occur at the normal vesting dates subject to satisfaction of their specified performance conditions at that time. Portions of these awards vested on 1 July 2015 and pertain to the RoE portion of the 2011 LTPP and the TSR and EPS portions of the 2012 LTPP.

   Pro-rated number of
share awards in 2011
(RoE portion) and 2012 LTPP
   Overall vesting percentage   Number of awards vesting   Dividend equivalent
shares
   Total value of awards  
vesting and dividend  
equivalent shares  
(£’000)  
 

 

 

Tom King

   44,846 (ADSs)     56.12%     25,168 (ADSs)     4,063 (ADSs)     1,202    

 

Nick Winser

  

 

 

 

166,305

 

  

  

 

 

 

76.37%

 

  

  

 

 

 

127,000

 

  

  

 

 

 

24,035

 

  

  

 

 

 

1,235  

 

  

 

 

Shareholder dilution

Where shares may be issued or treasury shares reissued to satisfy incentives, the aggregate dilution resulting from executive share-based incentives will not exceed 5% in any 10-year period. Dilution resulting from all incentives, including all-employee incentives, will not exceed 10% in any 10-year period. The Committee reviews dilution against these limits regularly and under these limits the Company, as at 31 March 2016, had headroom of 4.01% and 7.98% respectively.

78National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Corporate Governance


 

Corporate Governance

 

Statement of Directors’ shareholdings and share interests (audited information)

The Executive Directors are required to build up and hold a shareholding from vested share plan awards. Deferred share plan awards are not taken into account for these purposes until the end of the deferral period. Shares are valued for these purposes at the 31 March 2016 price, which was 987 pence per share ($71.42 per ADS).

The following table shows how each Executive Director complies with the shareholding requirement and also the number of shares owned by the Non-executive Directors, including connected persons, as Non-executive Directors do not have a shareholding requirement.

The shareholding is as at 31 March 2016 and the salary used to calculate the value of shareholding is the gross annual salary as at 31 March 2016:

 

Directors’ Remuneration Reportcontinued

The normal vesting dates for the conditional share awards subject to performance conditions are 1 July 2016; 1 July 2016 and 1 July 2017; 1 July 2017; and 1 July 2018 for the LTPP 2012, LTPP 2013, LTPP 2014 and LTPP 2015 respectively.
 The normal vesting dates for the conditional share awards subject to continuous employment are 13 June 2016 and 17 June 2017 for the DSP 2013 and DSP 2014 respectively.
In each of April and May 2016 a further 15 shares were purchased on behalf of Andrew Bonfield, Steve Holliday and John Pettigrew via the Share Incentive Plan (an HMRC approved all-employee share plan), thereby increasing their beneficial interests. There have been no other changes in Directors’ shareholdings between 1 April 2016 and 18 May 2016.
Both Andrew Bonfield and Steve Holliday have met their shareholding requirement of 400% and 500% of base salary, respectively. As both John Pettigrew and Dean Seavers were relatively new in post, they have not yet met their requirements and will not be allowed to sell shares other than to pay tax on receipt of vested shares or in exceptional circumstances until this requirement is met.

Directors Share ownership
requirements
(multiple of salary)
     Number of shares
owned outright
(including connected
persons)
     Number of shares
held as a multiple
of current salary
     Number of options
granted under the
Sharesave Plan
     Conditional share
awards subject to
performance
conditions (LTPP 2012,
2013, 2014 and 2015)
     Conditional share  
awards subject to  
continuous  
employment (DSP 2013  
and 2014)  
 

 

 

 

Executive Directors

                     

 

Andrew Bonfield

  400%       317,711       426%       6,651       756,209       92,754    

 

Steve Holliday

  500%       1,306,289       1,246%       3,542       1,224,546       126,771    

 

John Pettigrew

  400%       198,749       386%       4,286       417,251       28,691    

 

Dean Seavers (ADSs)

  400%       1,225       9%              85,767       –    

 

Non-executive Directors

                     

 

Nora Mead Brownell (ADSs)

         5,000       n/a                     –    

 

Jonathan Dawson

         36,586       n/a                     –    

 

Therese Esperdy (ADSs)

         1,600       n/a                     –    

 

Sir Peter Gershon

         83,363       n/a                     –    

 

Paul Golby

         2,500       n/a                     –    

 

Ruth Kelly

         800       n/a                     –    

 

Mark Williamson

         4,726       n/a                     –    

 

 

Notes:

Overall: Sharesave options are valued using fair values. Andrew Bonfield was the only Director who made a gain on the exercise of share options during the year.

Andrew Bonfield: On 31 March 2016 Andrew Bonfield held 6,651 options granted under the Sharesave plan. 2,022 options were granted at a value of 749 pence per share and they can be exercised at 749 pence per share between April 2020 and September 2020. 1,208 options were granted at a value of 745 pence per share and they can be exercised at 745 pence per share between April 2019 and September 2019. On 1 April 2016, he exercised a Sharesave option over 3,421 shares at the option price of 455 pence per share for expiration in September 2016 at a gain of £18,549. For Andrew Bonfield, the number of conditional share awards subject to performance conditions is as follows: LTPP 2012: 53,273; LTPP 2013: 194,798; LTPP 2014: 248,470; LTPP 2015: 259,668. The number of conditional share awards subject to continuous employment is as follows: DSP 2013: 45,706; DSP 2014: 47,048.

Steve Holliday: On 31 March 2016 Steve Holliday held 3,524 options granted under the Sharesave plan. 1,502 options were granted at a value of 599 pence per share, and they can be exercised at 599 pence per share between April 2017 and September 2017. 2,022 options were granted at a value of 749 pence per share and they can be exercised at 749 pence per share between April 2020 and September 2020. For Steve Holliday, the number of conditional share awards subject to performance conditions is as follows: LTPP 2012: 84,175; LTPP 2013: 307,793; LTPP 2014: 407,138; LTPP 2015: 425,440. The number of conditional share awards subject to continuous employment is as follows: DSP 2013: 57,118; DSP 2014: 69,653.

John Pettigrew: On 31 March 2016 John Pettigrew held 4,286 options granted under the Sharesave plan. 1,252 options were granted at a value of 599 pence per share, and they can be exercised at 599 pence per share between April 2019 and September 2019. 3,034 options were granted at a value of 749 pence per share and they can be exercised at 749 pence per share between April 2020 and September 2020. The number of conditional share awards subject to performance conditions is as follows: LTPP 2012: 13,098; LTPP 2013: 63,361; LTPP 2014: 161,720; LTPP 2015: 179,072. The number of conditional share awards subject to continuous employment is as follows: DSP 2013: 14,341; DSP 2014: 14,350.

Dean Seavers: The number of conditional share awards subject to performance conditions is as follows: LTPP 2014: 40,966; LTPP 2015: 44,801.

Dean Seavers, Nora Mead Brownell and Therese Esperdy: Holdings and, for Dean Seavers, awards are shown as ADSs and each ADS represents five ordinary shares.

External appointments and retention of fees

The table below details the Executive Directors who served as non-executive directors in other companies during the year ended 31 March 2016 and were allowed to retain fees for their services:

 

  Performance graph and table   Total shareholder return
  This chart shows National Grid plc’s six year annual total shareholder return (TSR) performance against the FTSE 100 Index since 31 March 2009. The FTSE 100 Index has been chosen because it is the widely recognised performance benchmark for large companies in the United Kingdom. Over the last four years, National Grid’s TSR has outperformed that of the FTSE 100 and underpins the pay shown for the Chief Executive in the table below, using current and previously published single total remuneration figures. The TSR level shown at 31 March each year is the average of the closing daily TSR levels for the 30 day period up to and including that date. It assumes dividends are reinvested. LOGO
 
  CEO’s pay in the last six financial years
  Steve Holliday was the CEO throughout this six year period.
     2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15  
  

 

 

 

Total single figure £’000

3,9313,7383,5393,1704,8014,845  
 

 

APP (proportion of maximum awarded)

95.33%81.33%68.67%56.65%77.94%94.80%  
 

 

PSP/LTPP (proportion of maximum vesting including expected vesting for RoE measure)

 

100.00%

 

65.15%

 

49.50%

 

25.15%

 

76.20%

 

55.81%  

 

  

 

 
 Percentage change in CEO’s remuneration
 

The table below shows how the percentage change in the CEO’s salary, benefits and APP between 2013/14 and 2014/15 compares with the percentage change in the average of each of those components of remuneration for non-union employees in the UK. The Committee views this group as the most appropriate comparator group, as the CEO is UK-based and this group excludes employees represented by trade unions, whose pay and benefits are negotiated with each individual union.

 

    

Salary

Taxable benefits

APP
    

 

 

 

    

£’000

£’000

 

Increase  

£’000

£’000

Increase  

£’000£’000Increase  
    

 

 

 

 

 

    

2014/15

2013/14

  

2014/15

2013/14

 2014/152013/14 
  

 

 

 

Steve Holliday

1,021

 1,000  

2.1%  

40

35

14.3%  

1,2101,1693.5%  
 

 

UK non-union employees

 

 

(increase per employee)

 

2.3%  

 

10.6%  

 

3.5%  

 

  

 

 

 

1.    The Taxable benefits figure for 2014/15 for Steve Holliday and for UK non-union employees includes the benefit of Sharesave options granted during the year which were not in the benefits total for 2013/14.

 
 Statement of implementation of remuneration policy in 2015/16
 The remuneration policy adopted at the 2014 AGM will continue to be implemented during 2015/16 as follows:
 

 

Salary

              From 1 June 2015 

From 1 June 2014

 

 

Increase  

 

  

 

 

 

Andrew Bonfield

£737,000£729,8000.99%  
 

 

Steve Holliday

£1,035,000£1,025,0000.98%  
 

 

John Pettigrew

£508,250£475,0007%  
 

 

Dean Seavers (from 1 April 2015)

 

$1,000,000

 

$1,000,000

 

0%  

 

  

 

 

 

There will be no change to the implementation of the remuneration policy for 2015/16. Salary increases will normally be in line with the increase awarded to other employees in the UK and US, unless there is a change in role or responsibility. In line with the policy on recruitment remuneration, salaries for new directors may be set below market level initially and aligned to market level over time (provided the increase is merited by the individual’s contribution and performance).

 

 

APP measures for 2015/16

 

           

Weighting  

 

  

 

 

 

Adjusted EPS

35%  
 

 

Group or UK or US RoE

35%  
 

 

Individual objectives

 

30%  

 

  

 

 

 

The APP targets are considered commercially sensitive and consequently will be disclosed after the end of the financial year in the 2015/16 annual report on remuneration.

 

 

Performance measures for LTPP to be awarded in 2015

 

 
     

Andrew  
Bonfield  

 

Steve  
Holliday  

 

Dean  
Seavers  

  

John  
Pettigrew  

 

Threshold –20% vesting

 Maximum – 100% vesting
  

 

 

 

Group RoE

50%  

50%  

 25%    

25%  

11.0%

12.5% or more
 

 

UK RoE

–  

–  

 –    

25%  

1 percentage point above the

3.5 percentage points or more above
 

average allowed regulatory return

the average allowed regulatory return
 

 

US RoE

–  

–  

 25%    

– 

 90% of the average allowed

105% or more of the average allowed
 

regulatory return

regulatory return
 

 

Value growth

 

 

 

50%  

 

 

50%  

 

 

 

 

 

50%  

 

 

  

 

 

50% 

 

 10.0%

 

 

12.0% or more

 

  

 

CompanyRetained fees (£)  

Andrew Bonfield

Kingfisher plc82,400  

 

        74Relative importance of spend on pay

This chart shows the relative importance of spend on pay compared with other costs and disbursements (dividends, tax, net interest and capital expenditure). Given the capital-intensive nature of our business and the scale of our operations, these costs were chosen as the most relevant for comparison purposes. All amounts exclude exceptional items and remeasurements.

LOGO

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Annual report on remuneration79


Corporate Governancecontinued

Annual report on remuneration continued

Performance graph and table

This chart shows National Grid plc’s seven-year annual total shareholder return (TSR) performance against the FTSE 100 Index since 31 March 2009. The FTSE 100 Index has been chosen because it is the widely recognised performance benchmark for large companies in the UK. The Company’s TSR has outperformed that of the FTSE 100 for the last five years and underpins the pay shown for the CEO in the table below, using current and previously published single total remuneration figures.

The TSR level shown at 31 March each year is the average of the closing daily TSR levels for the 30-day period up to and including that date. It assumes dividends are reinvested.

CEO’s pay in the last seven financial years

Steve Holliday was the CEO throughout this seven-year period.

Total shareholder return

LOGO

   2009/10   2010/11   2011/12   2012/13   2013/14   2014/15   2015/16  

 

 

Total single figure £’000

   3,931     3,738     3,539     3,170     4,801     4,845     5,151   

APP (proportion of maximum awarded)

   95.33%     81.33%     68.67%     55.65%     77.94%     94.80%     94.60%   

PSP/LTPP (proportion of maximum vesting including expected vesting

for RoE measure)

   100.00%     65.15%     49.50%     25.15%     76.20%     55.81%     63.45%   

 

 

Percentage change in CEO’s remuneration

The table below shows how the percentage change in the CEO’s salary, benefits and APP between 2014/15 and 2015/16 compares with the percentage change in the average of each of those components of remuneration for non-union employees in the UK. The Committee views this group as the most appropriate comparator group, as the CEO is UK-based and this group excludes employees represented by trade unions, whose pay and benefits are negotiated with each individual union.

     Salary   Taxable benefits   APP         
     £’000   £’000   Increase   £’000   £’000   Increase   £’000   £’000   Increase  
 

 

 
     2015/16   2014/15       2015/16   2014/15       2015/16   2014/15     

 

 

Steve Holliday

    1,033     1,021     1.2%     41     40     2.5%     1,222     1,210     1.0%   

UK non-union employees (increase per employee)

        1.9%         7.9%         (9.1)%   

 

 

Note:

The APP for UK non-union employees decreased, which is a reflection of the reduction in payout level for the UK RoE measure which forms a key part of the APP for this population.

Statement of implementation of remuneration policy in 2016/17

The remuneration policy adopted at the 2014 AGM will continue to be implemented during 2016/17 as described below. Steve Holliday is retiring in July 2016 and will be stepping down from the Board at that time. He will be treated as a ‘good leaver’ in line with our remuneration policy. He is intending to draw from his pension from October 2016.

 

Salary

Salary increases will normally be in line with the increase awarded to other employees in the UK and US, unless there is a change in role or responsibility. In line with the policy on recruitment remuneration, salaries for new directors may be set below market level initially and aligned to market level over time (provided the increase is merited by the individual’s contribution and performance). John Pettigrew’s base salary was increased to £825,000 upon his appointment as CEO. This was some £210,000 below that of Steve Holliday, the retiring CEO.

 

 
      From 1 June 2016  From 1 June 2015  Increase   
 

Andrew Bonfield

  £751,740  £737,000  2.0%  
 

Steve Holliday

  £1,035,000  £1,035,000  0%  
 

Nicola Shaw from 1 July 2016

  £450,000    n/a  
 

John Pettigrew from 1 April 2016

  £825,000  £508,250  62.3%  
 

Dean Seavers

  $1,025,000  $1,000,000  2.5%  
        

APP measures for 2016/17

The APP targets are considered commercially sensitive and consequently will be disclosed after the end of the financial year in the 2016/17 annual report on remuneration. Steve Holliday will be eligible to receive a prorated portion of the 2016/17 APP.

Weighting 

Adjusted EPS

35% 

Group or UK or US RoE

35% 

Individual objectives

30% 

80National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Corporate Governance 


 

   Corporate Governance

 

Performance measures for LTPP to be awarded in 2016

Steve Holliday will not receive a 2016 LTPP award. John Pettigrew’s 2016 award will increase to 350% of salary.

                Andrew Bonfield               John Pettigrew               Dean Seavers               Nicola Shaw   Threshold – 20% vesting   Maximum – 100% vesting 

Group RoE

   50%     50%     25%     25%     11.0%     12.5% or more  

 

UK RoE

  

 

 

 

 

  

  

 

 

 

 

  

  

 

 

 

 

  

  

 

 

 

25%

 

  

  

 

 
 
 

 

1 percentage point
above the average
allowed regulatory return

 

  
  
  

  

 

 
 
 

 

3.5 percentage points or
more above the average
allowed regulatory return

 

  
  
  

 

US RoE

  

 

 

 

 

  

  

 

 

 

 

  

  

 

 

 

25%

 

  

  

 

 

 

 

  

  

 

 
 

 

90% of the average
allowed regulatory return

 

  
  

  

 

 
 
 

 

105% or more of the
average allowed
regulatory return

 

  
  
  

 

Value growth

  

 

 

 

50%

 

  

  

 

 

 

50%

 

  

  

 

 

 

50%

 

  

  

 

 

 

50%

 

  

  

 

 

 

10.0%

 

  

  

 

 

 

12.0% or more

 

  

NEDs’ fees

Committee chair fees are in addition to committee membership fees. Therese Esperdy was appointed as a Non-executive Director to the National Grid USA Board on 1 May 2015 with an annual fee of £25,000 in addition to her current NED fees.

   £’000   
    From 1 June 2016  From 1 June 2015   Increase  

Chairman

  500  495   1%  

Senior Independent Director

  22  22   0%  

Board fee (UK-based)

  66  64   3%  

Board fee (US-based)

  78  76   3%  

Committee membership fee

  9    0%  

Chair Audit Committee

  19  17   12%  

Chair Remuneration Committee

  19  17   12%  

Chair (other Board committee)

  12.5  12.5   0%  

Advisors to the Remuneration Committee

The Committee received advice during 2015/16 from independent remuneration consultants New Bridge Street (NBS), a trading name of Aon Hewitt Ltd (part of Aon plc). NBS were selected as advisors by the Committee from 1 August 2013 following a competitive tendering process.

Work undertaken by NBS included updating the Committee on trends in compensation and governance matters and advising the Committee in connection with benchmarking of the total reward packages for the Executive Directors and other senior employees. NBS are a member of the Remuneration Consultants Group and have signed up to that group’s Code of Conduct. The Committee is satisfied that any potential conflicts were appropriately managed. NBS does not provide any other advice or services to the Company. In the year to 31 March 2016 the Committee paid a total of £77,820 to NBS, with fees being charged on a time incurred basis.

The Committee also received specialist advice from the following organisations:

 

Alithos Limited: provision of TSR calculations for the LTPP (£10,417 paid in 2015/16);
 Linklaters LLP: advice relating to share schemes and to Directors’ service contracts (£44,621 paid in 2015/16); and
Willis Towers Watson: advice relating to the benchmarking of the total reward packages for the Executive Committee and the Chairman (£58,509 paid in 2015/16).

The Committee reviews the objectivity and independence of the advice it receives from its advisors each year. It is satisfied that they all provided credible and professional advice.

The Committee considers the views of the Chairman on the performance and remuneration of the CEO; and of the CEO on the performance and remuneration of the other members of the Executive Committee. The Committee is also supported by the Group General Counsel & Company Secretary who acts as Secretary to the Committee, the Group HR Director, the Group Head of Reward & Performance and the Group Head of Pensions. No other advisors have provided significant services to the Committee in the year.

Voting on 2013/14 Directors’ Remuneration Policy at 2014 AGM

The voting figures shown refer to votes cast at the 2014 AGM and represent 61.76% of the issued share capital. In addition, shareholders holding 74 million shares abstained.

    For   Against  

Number of votes

   2,223,573,203    85,131,552  

Proportion of votes

   96.31%    3.69%  

Voting on 2014/15 Annual Remuneration Report at 2015 AGM

The voting figures shown refer to votes cast at the 2015 AGM and represent 62.61% of the issued share capital. In addition, shareholders holding 30 million shares abstained.

    For   Against  

Number of votes

   2,240,539,614    63,053,994  

Proportion of votes

   97.26%    2.74%  

 

The Directors’ Remuneration Report has been approved by the Board and signed on its behalf by:

Jonathan Dawson

Chairman of the Remuneration Committee

18 May 2016

 

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Annual report on remuneration81


    

Financial Statements contents

 

 

 
  NEDs’ fees  
      £’000        
      From
            1 June 2015
      

From

1 June 2014

      Increase   
  

 

 
 

 

Chairman

 495   490   1.0%    
 

 

Senior Independent Director

 22   22   0%    
 

 

Board fee (UK-based)

 64   62   3.2%    
 

 

Board fee (US-based)

 76   74   2.7%    
 

 

Committee membership fee

 9   9   0%    
 

 

Chair Audit Committee

 17   17   0%    
 

 

Chair Remuneration Committee

 17   17   0%    
 

 

Chair (other Board committees)

 

 

 

12.5

 

  

 

 

 

12.5

 

  

 

 

 

0%  

 

  

 

  

 

 
 

 

1.  Committee chair fees are in addition to committee membership fees.

     

 

 

2.  Therese Esperdy has been appointed as a Non-executive Director to the National Grid USA Board from 1 May 2015 with an annual fee of £25,000 in addition to her current NED fees.

     

 

 

Advisors to the Remuneration Committee

  

 The Committee received advice during 2014/15 from independent remuneration consultants New Bridge Street (NBS), a trading name of Aon Hewitt Ltd (part of Aon plc). NBS were selected as advisors by the Committee from 1 August 2013 following a competitive tendering process.    
 

 

Work undertaken by NBS included updating the Committee on trends in compensation and governance matters and advising the Committee in connection with benchmarking of the total reward packages for the Executive Directors and other senior employees. NBS are a member of the Remuneration Consultants Group and have signed up to that group’s Code of Conduct. The Committee is satisfied that any potential conflicts were appropriately managed. NBS does not provide any other advice or services to the Company. In the year to 31 March 2015 the Committee paid a total of £88,890 to NBS, with fees being charged on a time incurred basis.

       

 

 

The Committee also received specialist advice from the following organisations:

  

 

 

  Alithos Limited: provision of TSR calculations for the LTPP (£18,750 paid in 2014/15);

  

 

  Linklaters LLP: advice relating to share schemes and to Directors’ service contracts as well as providing other legal advice to the Company (£82,330 paid in 2014/15); and

   

 

  Towers Watson: advice relating to the benchmarking of the total reward packages for the Executive Directors and other senior employees (£74,450 paid in 2014/15).

   

 

 

The Committee reviews the objectivity and independence of the advice it receives from its advisors each year. It is satisfied that they all provided credible and professional advice.

   

 

 

The Committee considers the views of the Chairman on the performance and remuneration of the CEO; and of the CEO on the performance and remuneration of the other members of the Executive Committee. The Committee is also supported by the Group General Counsel & Company Secretary who acts as Secretary to the Committee, the Group HR Director, the Global Head of Reward and the Global Head of Pensions. No other advisors have provided significant services to the Committee in the year.

     

 

 

Voting on 2013/14 Directors’ remuneration policy at 2014 AGM

  

     

 

For

  

 

Against   

 
  

 

 
 

 

Number of votes

  

 2,223,573,203   85,131,552    
 

 

Proportion of votes

 

  

 

 

96.31%

 

  

 

 

 

3.69%  

 

  

 

  

 

 
 

 

1.  The voting figures shown above refer to votes cast at the 2014 AGM and represent 61.76% of the Initial Share Capital (ISC) voted. In addition, shareholders holding 74 million shares abstained.

      

 

 

Voting on 2013/14 Annual Directors’ Remuneration Report at 2014 AGM

  

     

 

For

  Against    
  

 

 
 

 

Number of votes

  

 2,314,662,027   23,340,071    
 

 

Proportion of votes

 

  

 

 

99.00%

 

  

 

 

 

1.00%  

 

  

 

  

 

 
 

 

1.  The voting figures shown above refer to votes cast at the 2014 AGM and represent 62.54% of the ISC voted. In addition, shareholders holding 45 million shares abstained.

     

 

 

Voting on amendments to rules of LTPP at 2014 AGM

  

     

 

For

  Against    
  

 

 
 

 

Number of votes

  

 2,256,939,935   85,466,726    
 

 

Proportion of votes

 

  

 

 

96.35%

 

  

 

 

 

3.65%  

 

  

 

  

 

 
 

 

1.  The voting figures shown above refer to votes cast at the 2014 AGM and represent 62.66% of the ISC voted. In addition, shareholders holding 40 million shares abstained.

 

     

 

 

   The Directors’ Remuneration Report has been approved by the Board and signed on its behalf by:

  

 

 

   Jonathan Dawson

  

    Chairman of the Remuneration Committee  
 

   20 May 2015

 

  

              
              
              
              

83

Introduction to the financial statements
Directors’ statement and independent auditors’ report

84

Statement of Directors’ responsibilities

85

Independent auditors’ report

93

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated financial statements under IFRS
Primary statements

94

Consolidated income statement

96

Consolidated statement of comprehensive income

97

Consolidated statement of changes in equity

98

Consolidated statement of financial position

100

Consolidated cash flow statement
Notes to the consolidated financial statements – analysis of items in the primary statements

102

Note 1 – Basis of preparation and recent accounting developments

104

Note 2 – Segmental analysis

109

Note 3 – Operating costs

111

Note 4 – Exceptional items and remeasurements

112

Note 5 – Finance income and costs

113

Note 6 – Tax

118

Note 7 – Earnings per share (EPS)

119

Note 8 – Dividends

120

Note 9 – Goodwill

121

Note 10 – Other intangible assets

122

Note 11 – Property, plant and equipment

123

Note 12 – Other non-current assets

124

Note 13 – Financial and other investments

125

Note 14 – Investments in joint ventures and associates

126

Note 15 – Derivative financial instruments

128

Note 16 – Inventories and current intangible assets

129

Note 17 – Trade and other receivables

130

Note 18 – Cash and cash equivalents

130

Note 19 – Borrowings

132

Note 20 – Trade and other payables

132

Note 21 – Other non-current liabilities

132

Note 22 – Pensions and other post-retirement benefits

138

Note 23 – Provisions

140

Note 24 – Share capital

141

Note 25 – Other equity reserves

142

Note 26 – Net debt
 

 

82 NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16 75Financial Statements


LOGO

 

Financial Statements contents

 

  
77Introduction to the financial statementsNotes to the consolidated financial
statements – supplementary information
Directors’ statement and
independent auditors’ report
136Note 27 –Commitments and contingencies
137Note 28 –Related party transactions
78Statement of Directors’ responsibilities137Note 29 –Actuarial information on pensions and other post-retirement benefits
79Independent auditors’ report
85Report of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm
141Note 30 –Financial risk management
149Note 31 –Borrowing facilities
150Note 32 –Subsidiary undertakings, joint ventures and associates
Consolidated financial statements under IFRS
Primary statements151Note 33 –Sensitivities on areas of estimation and uncertainty
86Consolidated income statement
88Consolidated statement of comprehensive income152Note 34 –Additional disclosures in respect of guaranteed securities
89Consolidated statement of changes in equity
90Consolidated statement of financial position 
92Consolidated cash flow statement

Company financial statements

under UK GAAP

Notes to the consolidated financial statements – analysis of items in the primary statementsBasis of preparation
159Company accounting policies
94Note 1   –Basis of preparation and recent accounting developments 
Primary statement
96Note 2   –Segmental analysis160Company balance sheet
101Note 3   –Operating costs 
103Note 4   –Exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveriesNotes to the Company financial statements
161Note 1   –Fixed asset investments
105Note 5   –Finance income and costs161Note 2   –Debtors
106Note 6   –Tax161Note 3   –Creditors
111Note 7   –Earnings per share (EPS)162Note 4   –Derivative financial instruments
112Note 8   –Dividends162Note 5   –Investments
113Note 9   –Goodwill162Note 6   –Borrowings
114Note 10 –Other intangible assets163Note 7   –Share capital
115Note 11 –Property, plant and equipment163Note 8   –Reserves
116Note 12 –Other non-current assets163Note 9   –Reconciliation of movements in total shareholders’ funds
117Note 13 –Financial and other investments
118Note 14 –Investments in joint ventures and associates163Note 10 –Parent Company guarantees
118Note 15 –Derivative financial instruments163Note 11 –Audit fees
121Note 16 –Inventories and current intangible assets 
122Note 17 –Trade and other receivables 
123Note 18 –Cash and cash equivalents 
123Note 19 –Borrowings 
126Note 20 –Trade and other payables 
126Note 21 –Other non-current liabilities 
126Note 22 –Pensions and other post-retirement benefits 
130Note 23 –Provisions 
132Note 24 –Share capital 
133Note 25 –Other equity reserves 
134Note 26 –Net debt 
 
 
       

    76


   Introduction to the financial statements

 

We have continued to develop our presentational format to provide shareholders and users of these financial statements with additional information and guidance, and to make them easier to understand.

   Financial Statements

 

Throughout these financial statements we have provided plain English explanations of the disclosures and why they are important to the understanding of our financial performance and position. In places we have also highlighted ‘Our strategy in action’, drawing out the key elements of our business model (set out in the Strategic Report on pages 12 to 13)

Introduction to the Financial Statements

Throughout these financial statements we have provided explanations of the disclosures and why they are important to the understanding of our financial performance and position. In places we have also highlighted ‘Our strategy in action’, drawing out the key elements of our business model (set out in the Strategic Report on pages 14 to 15), and showing how the disclosures reflect this strategy.

 

 

Audit opinions

We have two audit opinions on our financial statements, reflecting our dual listing on both the London Stock Exchange and the New York Stock Exchange. Due to the different reporting requirements for each listing, our auditors are required to confirm compliance with each set of standards in a prescribed format. The audit opinion as required under our UK listing (starting on page 79)85) continues to provide more detail as to how our auditors have planned and completedconducted their audit, as well as their views on significant matters they have noted and that were discussed by the Audit Committee.

 

Notes

Notes to the financial statements provide additional information required by statute, accounting standards or other regulations to assist in a more detailed understanding of the primary financial statements. In many notes we have included an accounting policy that describes how the transactions or balance in that note have been measured, recognised and disclosed. The basis of preparation section (note 1) provides details of accounting policies that apply to transactions and balances in general. There are also additional specific disclosure requirements due to our US listing which are included in the notes.

 

Unaudited commentary

We have presented with the financial statements certain analysis as part of the Strategic Report of our Annual Report. This approach provides a clearer narrative, a logical flow of information and reduces duplication. We have created a combined financial review, including a commentary on items within the primary statements, on pages 8694 to 93.101. Unless otherwise indicated, all analysis provided in the financial statements is on a statutory IFRS basis. All information in ruled boxes styled in the same manner as this one does not form part of the audited financial statements. This has been further highlighted by including the word ‘unaudited’ at the start of each box header. Unaudited commentary boxes appear on pages 8795 to 89, 91, 93,97, 99, 101, 107 to 100, 110, 112108, 117, 119 and 125.

LOGO

        NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/1577                                


Financial Statements131.

 

Statement of Directors’ responsibilities

 

 

The Directors are responsible for preparing theNational Grid Annual Report and Accounts including the consolidated financial statements and the Company financial statements, the Directors’ Report, including the Remuneration Report and the Strategic Report, in accordance with applicable law and regulations.

Company law requires the Directors to prepare financial statements for each financial year. Under that law the Directors have prepared the consolidated financial statements in accordance with International 2015/16

Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as adopted by the European Union, and the Company financial statements and the Remuneration Report in accordance with applicable law and United Kingdom Accounting Standards (United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice, UKStatements83


Statement of Directors’ responsibilities

The Directors are responsible for preparing the Annual Report and Accounts, including the consolidated financial statements and the Company financial statements, the Directors’ Report, including the Remuneration Report and the Strategic Report, in accordance with applicable law and regulations.

Company law requires the Directors to prepare financial statements for each financial year. Under that law the Directors have prepared the consolidated financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as adopted by the European Union, and the Company financial statements and the Remuneration Report in accordance with United Kingdom Accounting Standards, comprising Financial Reporting Standard 101 ‘Reduced Disclosure Framework’ (FRS 101), and applicable law – United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice (UK GAAP). In preparing the consolidated financial statements, the Directors have also elected to comply with IFRS, issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). Under company law the Directors must not approve the financial statements unless they are satisfied that they give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Company on a consolidated and individual basis and of the profit or loss of the Company on a consolidated basis for that period.

In preparing these financial statements, the Directors are required to:

 

select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently;

make judgements and estimates that are reasonable and prudent;

state that the consolidated financial statements comply with IFRS as issued by the IASB and IFRS adopted by the European Union and, with regard to the Company financial statements, that applicable UK Accounting Standards have been followed, subject to any material departures disclosed and explained in the financial statements; and

prepare the consolidated financial statements and Company financial statements on a going concern basis unless it is inappropriate to presume that the Company, on a consolidated and individual basis, will continue in business, in which case there should be supporting assumptions or qualifications as necessary.

The Directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting records that are sufficient to show and explain the Company’s transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the Company on a consolidated and individual basis, and to enable them to ensure that the consolidated financial statements comply with the Companies Act 2006 and Article 4 of the IAS Regulation, and the Company financial statements and the Remuneration Report comply with the Companies Act 2006. They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the Company and its subsidiaries and hence for taking reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.

The Directors are responsible for the maintenance and integrity of the Company’s website. Legislation in the United Kingdom governing the preparation and dissemination of financial statements may differ from legislation in other jurisdictions.

Having made the requisite enquiries, so far as the Directors in office at the date of the approval of this Report are aware, there is no relevant audit information of which the auditors are unaware and each Director has taken all reasonable steps to make themselves aware of any relevant audit information and to establish that the auditors are aware of that information.

Each of the Directors, whose names and functions are listed on pages 47 and 48, confirms that:

 

The Directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting records that are sufficient to show and explain the Company’s transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the Company on a consolidated and individual basis, and to enable them to ensure that the consolidated financial statements comply with the Companies Act 2006 and Article 4 of the IAS Regulation and the Company financial statements and the Remuneration Report comply with the Companies Act 2006. They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the Company and its subsidiaries and hence for taking reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.

The Directors are responsible for the maintenance and integrity of the Company’s website. Legislation in the United Kingdom governing the preparation and dissemination of financial statements may differ from legislation in other jurisdictions.

Having made the requisite enquiries, so far as the Directors in office at the date of the approval of this Report are aware, there is no relevant audit information of which the auditors are unaware and each Director has taken all reasonable steps to make themselves aware of any relevant audit information and to establish that the auditors are aware of that information.

Each of the Directors, whose names and functions are listed on page 43, confirms that:

to the best of their knowledge, the consolidated financial statements and the Company financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with IFRS as issued by the IASB and IFRS as adopted by the European Union and UK GAAP FRS 101 respectively, give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit of the Company on a consolidated and individual basis;

to the best of their knowledge, the Strategic Report contained in the Annual Report and Accounts includes a fair review of the development and performance of the business and the position of the Company on a consolidated and individual basis, together with a description of the principal risks and uncertainties that it faces; and

they consider that the Annual Report and Accounts, taken as a whole, is fair, balanced and understandable and provides the information necessary for shareholders to assess the Company’s position and performance, business model and strategy.

By order of the Board

Alison Kay

Group General Counsel & Company Secretary

20 May 2015

Company number: 4031152

Directors’ Report

The Directors’ Report, prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006 and the UK Listing Authority’s Listing Rules, and Disclosure Rules and Transparency Rules, comprising pages 08 to 81 and 174 to 202, was approved by the Board and signed on its behalf.

Strategic Report

The Strategic Report, comprising pages 02 to 45, was approved by the Board and signed on its behalf.

By order of the Board

Alison Kay

Group General Counsel & Company Secretary

18 May 2016

Company number: 4031152

 

       7884

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16

Financial Statements

 


 

 

[INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

 

LOGO

    NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15 79                                

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16

Financial Statements

85


[INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

 

    80


86 

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16

 

Financial Statements

 

[INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

LOGO

    NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/1581                                


[INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

 

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements87


[INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

88National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements


[INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

    82

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements89


[INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

90National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements


[INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements91


[INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

92National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements


 

 

[INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

LOGO

   NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/1583                                


[INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

    84


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmFinancial Statements

 

to the Board of Directors and Shareholders of National Grid plc

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

to the Board of Directors and Shareholders of National Grid plc

Audit opinion for Form 20-F

 

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated statement of financial position and the related consolidated income statement, consolidated statement of comprehensive income, consolidated cash flow statement and consolidated statement of changes in equity, present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of National Grid plc and its subsidiaries at 31 March 2016 and 31 March 2015, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended 31 March 2016 in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board and in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union.

Audit opinion for Form 20-F

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated statement of financial position and the related consolidated income statement, consolidated statement of comprehensive income, consolidated cash flow statement and consolidated statement of changes in equity, present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of National Grid plc and its subsidiaries at 31 March 2015 and 31 March 2014, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended 31 March 2015 in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board and in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union.

Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of 31 March 2015, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the Additional Information section appearing on page 173 of the 2015

Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of 31 March 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the Additional Information section appearing on page 183 of the 2016 Annual Report and Accounts.

Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorisations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorised acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

London

United Kingdom

2018 May 20152016

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements93


    

 

LOGO

        NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/1585                                


        Financial Statements

Consolidated income statement

for the years ended 31 March

 

    Notes  

2016

£m

  

2016

£m

  

2015

£m

  

2015

£m

  

2014

£m

  

2014

£m

 

Revenue

   2(a   15,115     15,201     14,809  

Operating costs

   3        (11,030      (11,421      (11,074

Operating profit

        

Before exceptional items and remeasurements

   2(b  4,096     3,863     3,664   

Exceptional items and remeasurements

   4    (11   (83   71   

Total operating profit

   2(b   4,085     3,780     3,735  

Finance income

   5     22     36     36  

Finance costs

        

Before exceptional items and remeasurements

   5    (1,035   (1,069   (1,144 

Exceptional items and remeasurements

   4,5    (99   (165   93   

Total finance costs

   5     (1,134   (1,234   (1,051

Share of post-tax results of joint ventures and associates

   14        59        46        28  

Profit before tax

        

Before exceptional items and remeasurements

   2(b  3,142     2,876     2,584   

Exceptional items and remeasurements

   4    (110   (248   164   

Total profit before tax

   2(b   3,032     2,628     2,748  

Tax

        

Before exceptional items and remeasurements

   6    (753   (695   (581 

Exceptional items and remeasurements

   4,6    315     78     297   

Total tax

   6        (438      (617      (284

Profit after tax

        

Before exceptional items and remeasurements

    2,389     2,181     2,003   

Exceptional items and remeasurements

   4    205        (170      461      

Profit for the year

           2,594        2,011        2,464  

Attributable to:

        

Equity shareholders of the parent

     2,591     2,019     2,476  

Non-controlling interests

           3        (8      (12
            2,594        2,011        2,464  

Earnings per share1

        

Basic

   7(a   69.0p     53.2p     65.2p  

Diluted

   7(b      68.7p        52.9p        64.9p  

1.  Comparative amounts have been restated to reflect the impact of additional shares issued as scrip dividends.

      Notes    

2015 

£m 

   

2015 

£m 

   

2014 

£m 

   

2014 

£m 

   

2013 

£m 

   

2013   

£m   

 
  

 

 
 

Revenue

 2(a)   15,201    14,809    14,359    
 

Operating costs

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

(11,421)

 

  

 

 

 

(11,074)

 

  

 

 

 

(10,610) 

 

  

 

  

 

 
 

Operating profit

 

Before exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries

 2(b)   3,863    3,664    3,639   
 

Exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

(83)

 

  

 

 

 

71 

 

  

 

 

 

110 

 

  

 

      

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

   
 

Total operating profit

 2(b)   3,780    3,735    3,749    
 
 

Finance income

    36    36    30    
 
 

Finance costs

 

Before exceptional items and remeasurements

    (1,069)   (1,144)   (1,154)  
 

Exceptional items and remeasurements

 

 

 

4,5 

 

  

 

 

 

(165)

 

  

 

 

 

93 

 

  

 

 

 

68 

 

  

 

      

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

   
 

Total finance costs

    (1,234)   (1,051)   (1,086)   
 

Share of post-tax results of joint ventures and associates

 

 

 

14 

 

  

 

 

 

46 

 

  

 

 

 

28 

 

  

 

 

 

18  

 

  

 

  

 

 
 

Profit before tax

 

Before exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries

 2(b)   2,876    2,584    2,533   
 

Exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

(248)

 

  

 

 

 

164 

 

  

 

 

 

178 

 

  

 

      

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

   
 

Total profit before tax

 2(b)   2,628    2,748    2,711    
 

Tax

 

Before exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries

    (695)   (581)   (619)  
 

Exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries

 

 

 

4,6 

 

  

 

 

 

78 

 

  

 

 

 

297 

 

  

 

 

 

62 

 

  

 

      

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

   
 

Total tax

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

(617)

 

  

 

 

 

(284)

 

  

 

 

 

(557) 

 

  

 

  

 

 
 

Profit after tax

 

Before exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries

 2,181    2,003    1,914   
 

Exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

(170)

 

  

 

 

 

461 

 

  

 

 

 

240 

 

  

 

  

 

 
 

Profit for the year

 

 

 

2,011 

 

  

 

 

 

2,464 

 

  

 

 

 

2,154  

 

  

 

  

 

 
 

Attributable to:

 

Equity shareholders of the parent

 2,019    2,476    2,153    
 

Non-controlling interests

 

 

 

(8)

 

  

 

 

 

(12)

 

  

 

 

 

1  

 

  

 

  

 

 
  

 

2,011 

 

  

 

 

 

2,464 

 

  

 

 

 

2,154  

 

  

 

  

 

 
 

Earnings per share1

 

Basic

 7(a)   53.6p    65.7p    57.2p    
 

Diluted

 

 

 

7(b)

 

  

 

 

 

53.4p 

 

  

 

 

 

65.4p 

 

  

 

 

 

57.0p  

 

  

 

  

 

 
 

 

1.  Comparative amounts have been restated to reflect the impact of additional shares issued as scrip dividends.

  

 

 

    

       86
94National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements 


 

   Financial Statements

 

    

    

    

    

 

  Unaudited commentary on the consolidated income statement

 

 

The consolidated income statement shows all revenue earned and costs incurred in the year, with the difference being the overall profit for the year.

Revenue

Revenue for the year ended 31 March 2016 decreased by £86m to £15,115m. This decrease was driven by lower revenues in our US Regulated business, partly offset by revenue growth across all of our other businesses, in particular UK Electricity Transmission. US Regulated revenues were £493m lower year on year due to lower commodity costs passed on to customers and unfavourable timing of recoveries. This was partly offset by higher increased revenue allowances under the Niagara Mohawk three year rate plan and the benefits of capex trackers and the stronger US dollar. UK Electricity Transmission revenue increased by £223m, mostly reflecting the recovery of higher pass-through costs such as payments to other UK network owners and system balancing costs.

Operating costs

Operating costs for the year ended 31 March 2016 of £11,030m were £391m lower than the prior year. This decrease in costs included a £72m impact in exceptional items and remeasurements, which is discussed below. Excluding exceptional items and remeasurements, operating costs were £319m lower, principally due to lower pass-through costs such as gas and electric commodity costs in the US and additional costs incurred last year in the US to improve data quality and bring regulatory filings up to date, partially offset by higher depreciation as a result of newly commissioned assets and the impact of the stronger US dollar on sterling results.

Net finance costs

For the year ended 31 March 2016, net finance costs before exceptional items and remeasurements were £20m lower than 2014/15 at £1,013m, mainly as a result of lower UK RPI inflation, continued focus on management of cash balances and the benefit of last year’s debt repurchases, partially offset by increased borrowings and the impact of the stronger US dollar.

Tax

The consolidated income statement shows all revenue earnedtax charge on profits before exceptional items and costs incurredremeasurements was £58m higher than 2014/15. This was mainly a result of increased taxable profits in the year. The effective tax rate for the year was 24.0% (2014/15: 24.2%).

Exceptional items and remeasurements

Operating costs for the year ended 31 March 2016 included an £11m gain on remeasurement of commodity contracts, together with £22m exceptional costs associated with the difference beingGas Distribution sales process. In the overall profitprevious year, operating costs included a net £83m loss on remeasurements.

Finance costs for the year.

Revenue

Revenue for the year ended 31 March 2015 increased by £392m to £15,201m. This increase was driven by higher revenues in our UK Electricity Transmission business, reflecting increases in allowed Transmission Owner revenues, and higher core allowances and pass-through costs in UK Gas Transmission. Revenues in our UK Gas Distribution business were slightly lower as a result of changes in allowed revenues for replacement expenditure (repex)year ended 31 March 2016 included a loss of £99m on financial remeasurements, relating to net losses on derivative financial instruments. For the previous year ended 31 March 2015, we incurred exceptional debt redemption costs of £131m and a loss of £34m on financial remeasurements. Exceptional tax for 2015/16 was a credit of £315m which represents tax credits on the exceptional items and remeasurements above, together with a deferred tax credit on the recalculation of deferred tax liabilities as a result of the reduction in the UK tax rate from 20% to 18%. Our US Regulated businesses revenues were also lower, as a result of the end of the LIPA Management Services Agreement (MSA) last year, partially offset by revenue increases from existing rate plans, including capex trackers, together with additional income from gas customer growth and the impact of the strengthening US dollar.

Operating costs

Operating costs for the year ended 31 March 2015 of £11,421m were £347m higher than the prior year. This increase in costs included a £154m year on year impact of changes in exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries, which is discussed below. Excluding exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries, operating costs were £193m higher, principally due to: increases in controllable costs, including the impact of inflation and additional costs incurred in the US to improve data quality and bring regulatory filings up to date; higher US bad debt costs following last year’s exceptionally cold winter; and higher depreciation and amortisation as a result of continued investment programmes. These cost increases were partly offset by a reduction in spend on US financial systems implementation and stabilisation upgrades, with the project completing in the first half of this year.

Net finance costs

For the year ended 31 March 2015, net finance costs before exceptional items and remeasurements were £75m lower than 2013/14 at £1,033m, mainly as a result of lower average gross debt through the year, lower RPI in the UK and refinancing debt at lower rates.

Tax

The tax charge on profit before exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries was £114m higher than 2013/14. This was mainly due to higher profits before tax and the non-recurrence of one-off items that benefited the prior year.

Exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries

Operating profit for the year ended 31 March 2015 included an £83m loss (2013/14: £16m gain) on remeasurement of commodity contracts. The year ended 31 March 2014 also included a net £55m gain on exceptional items, including a net gain on the LIPA MSA transition in the US of £254m; restructuring costs of £136m, primarily in the UK as we reorganised certain parts of our business to deliver under the new RIIO price controls; and a £79m provision for the demolition of UK gas holders that are no longer required.

Finance costs for the year ended 31 March 2015 included exceptional debt redemption costs of £131m and a loss of £34m on financial remeasurements, relating to net losses on derivative financial instruments.

Exceptional tax for 2014/15 of £78m primarily represents tax credits on the exceptional items and remeasurements described above.

Adjusted earnings and EPS

Adjusted earnings and EPS, which exclude exceptional items and remeasurements, are provided to reflect the business performance subtotals used by the Company. The following chart shows the five year trend in adjusted profit attributable to equity shareholders of the parent (adjusted earnings) and adjusted earnings per share. See page 186196 for a reconciliation of adjusted basic EPS to EPS.

Adjusted earnings and adjusted EPS1

 

LOGOLOGO

1.  Adjusted earnings and adjusted EPS are attributable to equity shareholders of the parent.

The above earnings performance translated into adjusted EPS growth in 2014/152015/16 of 4.6p (9%5.9p (10%).

In accordance with IAS 33, all earnings per share and adjusted earnings per share amounts for comparative periods have been restated for shares issued via scrip dividends.

Exchange rates

Our financial results are reported in sterling. Transactions for our US operations are denominated in dollars, so the related amounts that are reported in sterling depend on the dollar to sterling exchange rate. The table below shows the average and closing exchange rates of sterling to US dollars.

 

     2014/15           2013/14         % change     2015/16   2014/15   % change  

 

Weighted average (income statement)

 1.58 1.62 (2)%     1.47     1.58     (7)%   

Year end (balance sheet)

 1.49 1.67 (11)%     1.44     1.49     (3)%   

 

If 2013/14 results had been translated at 2014/15The movement in foreign exchange rates,during 2015/16 has resulted in a £560m increase in revenue, a £73m increase in adjusted operating profit and a £67m increase in operating profit reported in sterling would have been £212m, £25m and £32m higher respectively.profit.

LOGO
 

 


 NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16 87Financial Statements
95


Financial Statements

    

Consolidated statement of comprehensive income

for the years ended 31 March

 

Consolidated statement of comprehensive income

for the years ended 31 March

       

 

2016 

   2015    2014  
   Notes   £m    £m    £m  

 

 

Profit for the year

     2,594      2,011      2,464   

Other comprehensive income/(loss)

        

Items that will never be reclassified to profit or loss:

        

Remeasurements of net retirement benefit obligations

   22     539      (771)     485   

Tax on items that will never be reclassified to profit or loss

   6     (125)     299      (172)  

 

 

Total items that will never be reclassified to profit or loss

     414      (472)     313   

 

 

Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss:

        

Exchange adjustments

     69      175      (158)  

Net gains/(losses) in respect of cash flow hedges

     50      (154)     63   

Transferred to profit or loss in respect of cash flow hedges

     29      13      27   

Net gains on available-for-sale investments

     43      41        

Transferred to profit or loss on sale of available-for-sale investments

     –      (8)     (14)  

Tax on items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss

   6     (32)     11      (2)  

 

 

Total items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss

     159      78      (78)  

 

 

Other comprehensive income/(loss) for the year, net of tax

     573      (394)     235   

 

 

Total comprehensive income for the year

     3,167      1,617     2,699   

 

 

Attributable to:

        

Equity shareholders of the parent

     3,164      1,624      2,711   

Non-controlling interests

          (7)     (12)  

 

 
     3,167      1,617     2,699   

 

 

 

      Notes          2015
£m
          2014
£m
  

        2013   

£m   

 
  

 

 
  

Profit for the year

    2,011    2,464    2,154    
 
  

Other comprehensive (loss)/income

     
  

Items that will never be reclassified to profit or loss:

     
  

Remeasurements of net retirement benefit obligations

   22      (771  485    (714)   
  

Tax on items that will never be reclassified to profit or loss

   6      299    (172  179    
  

 

 
 

Total items that will never be reclassified to profit or loss

 (472 313   (535)   
  

 

 
 

Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss:

 

Exchange adjustments

 175   (158 117    
 

Net (losses)/gains in respect of cash flow hedges

 (154 63   (31)   
 

Transferred to profit or loss in respect of cash flow hedges

 13   27   73    
 

Net gains on available-for-sale investments

 41   6   20    
 

Transferred to profit or loss on sale of available-for-sale investments

 (8 (14 (10)   
 

Tax on items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss

 6     11   (2 (15)   
  

 

 
 

Total items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss

 78   (78 154    
  

 

 
  

Other comprehensive (loss)/income for the year, net of tax

    (394  235    (381)   
  

 

 
  

Total comprehensive income for the year

    1,617    2,699    1,773    
  

 

 
  

Attributable to:

     
  

Equity shareholders of the parent

    1,624    2,711    1,772    
  

Non-controlling interests

    (7  (12  1    
  

 

 
      1,617    2,699    1,773    
  

 

 

   Unaudited commentary on consolidated statement of comprehensive income

 

The consolidated statement of comprehensive income records certain items as prescribed by the accounting rules. For us, the majority of the income or expense included here relates to movements in actuarial assumptions on pension schemes and the associated tax impact. These items are not part of profit for the year, yet are important to allow the reader to gain a more comprehensive picture of our performance as a whole.

 

Remeasurements of net retirement benefit obligations

We had a net lossgain after tax of £472m (2013/14:£414m (2014/15: net gainloss of £313m)£472m) on our pension and other post-retirement benefit schemes which is due to changes in key assumptions made in the valuation calculation of pension liabilities and differences between the expected and actual pension asset returns.

Exchange adjustments

Adjustments are made when we translate the results and net assets of our companies operating outside the UK, as well as debt we have issued inand derivative transactions designated as a net investment hedge of our foreign currencies.currency operations. The net movement for the year resulted in a gain of £69m (2014/15: £175m (2013/14: £158m loss)gain).

Net gains/(losses)/gains in respect of cash flow hedges

The value of derivatives held to hedge cash flows is impacted by changes in expected interest rates and exchange rates. The net lossgain for the year was £50m (2014/15: £154m (2013/14: £63m gain)loss).

 

  8896National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements 


 

 

Consolidated statement of changes in equity   Financial Statements

 

for the years ended 31 March

 

Consolidated statement of changes in equity

for the years ended 31 March

 

    
 
 
Share
capital
£m
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
Share
premium
account
£m
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
Retained
earnings
£m
  
  
  
  
 
 

 

Other
equity
reserves

£m

  
  
1  

  

  
 
 

 

Total
shareholders’
equity

£m

  
  
  

  

  
 
 

 

Non-
    controlling
interests

£m

  
  
  

  

 

Total   

equity   

£m   

  

 

  

At 1 April 2012

  422    1,355    12,294    (4,835  9,236    7   9,243  
  

Profit for the year

          2,153        2,153    1   2,154  
  

Total other comprehensive (loss)/income for the year

          (535  154    (381     (381) 
  

 

  

Total comprehensive income for the year

          1,618    154    1,772    1   1,773  
  

Equity dividends

          (810      (810     (810) 
  

Scrip dividend related share issue2

  11    (11                 –  
  

Issue of treasury shares

          19        19       19  
  

Purchase of own shares

          (6      (6     (6) 
  

Other movements in non-controlling interests

                      (3 (3) 
  

Share-based payment

          20        20       20  
  

Tax on share-based payment

          (2      (2     (2) 
  

 

  

At 31 March 2013

  433    1,344    13,133    (4,681  10,229    5   10,234  
  

Profit for the year

          2,476        2,476    (12 2,464  
  

Total other comprehensive income/(loss) for the year

          313    (78  235       235  
  

 

  

Total comprehensive income/(loss) for the year

          2,789    (78  2,711    (12 2,699  
  

Equity dividends

          (1,059      (1,059     (1,059) 
  

Scrip dividend related share issue2

  6    (8          (2     (2) 
  

Issue of treasury shares

          14        14       14  
  

Purchase of own shares

          (5      (5     (5) 
  

Other movements in non-controlling interests

          (4      (4  15   11  
  

Share-based payment

          20        20       20  
  

Tax on share-based payment

          7        7       7  
  

 

  

At 31 March 2014

  439    1,336    14,895    (4,759  11,911    8   11,919  
  

Profit for the year

          2,019        2,019    (8 2,011  
  

Total other comprehensive (loss)/income for the year

          (472  77    (395  1   (394) 
  

 

  

Total comprehensive income/(loss) for the year

          1,547    77    1,624    (7 1,617  
  

Equity dividends

          (1,271      (1,271     (1,271) 
  

Scrip dividend related share issue2

  4    (5          (1     (1) 
  

Purchase of treasury shares

          (338      (338     (338) 
  

Issue of treasury shares

          23        23       23  
  

Purchase of own shares

          (7      (7     (7) 
  

Other movements in non-controlling interests

          (3      (3  11   8  
  

Share-based payment

          20        20       20  
  

Tax on share-based payment

          4        4       4  
  

 

  

At 31 March 2015

       443       1,331       14,870       (4,682  11,962    12      11,974  
  

 

 

 

1.  For further details of other equity reserves, see note 25.

2.  Included within share premium account are costs associated with scrip dividends.

    Share
capital
£m
   Share
premium
account
£m
  Retained
earnings
£m
  Other equity
reserves1
£m
  

Total
shareholders’
equity

£m

  Non-
controlling
interests
£m
  Total
equity
£m
 

At 1 April 2013

   433     1,344    13,133    (4,681  10,229    5    10,234  

Profit for the year

            2,476        2,476    (12  2,464  

Total other comprehensive income/(loss) for the year

            313    (78  235        235  

Total comprehensive income/(loss) for the year

            2,789    (78  2,711    (12  2,699  

Equity dividends

            (1,059      (1,059      (1,059

Scrip dividend related share issue2

   6     (8          (2      (2

Issue of treasury shares

            14        14        14  

Purchase of own shares

            (5      (5      (5

Other movements in non-controlling interests

            (4      (4  15    11  

Share-based payment

            20        20        20  

Tax on share-based payment

            7        7        7  

At 31 March 2014

   439     1,336    14,895    (4,759  11,911    8    11,919  

Profit for the year

            2,019        2,019    (8  2,011  

Total other comprehensive (loss)/income for the year

            (472  77    (395  1    (394

Total comprehensive income/(loss) for the year

            1,547    77    1,624    (7  1,617  

Equity dividends

            (1,271      (1,271      (1,271

Scrip dividend related share issue2

   4     (5          (1      (1

Purchase of treasury shares

            (338      (338      (338

Issue of treasury shares

            23        23        23  

Purchase of own shares

            (7      (7      (7

Other movements in non-controlling interests

            (3      (3  11    8  

Share-based payment

            20        20        20  

Tax on share-based payment

            4        4        4  

At 31 March 2015

   443     1,331    14,870    (4,682  11,962    12    11,974  

Profit for the year

            2,591        2,591    3    2,594  

Total other comprehensive income for the year

            414    159    573        573  

Total comprehensive income for the year

            3,005    159    3,164    3    3,167  

Equity dividends

            (1,337      (1,337      (1,337

Scrip dividend related share issue2

   4     (5          (1      (1

Purchase of treasury shares

            (267      (267      (267

Issue of treasury shares

            16        16        16  

Purchase of own shares

            (6      (6      (6

Other movements in non-controlling interests

                        (5  (5

Share-based payment

            22        22        22  

Tax on share-based payment

            2        2        2  

At 31 March 2016

   447     1,326    16,305    (4,523  13,555    10    13,565  

1.  For further details of other equity reserves, see note 25.

2.  Included within share premium account are costs associated with scrip dividends.

 

Unaudited commentary on consolidated statement of changes in equity

 

 

The consolidated statement of changes in equity shows additions and reductions to equity. For us, the main items are profit earned and dividends paid in the year.

 

Dividends

The Directors are proposing a final dividend of 28.16p,28.34p, bringing the total dividend for the year to 42.87p,43.34p, a 2.0%1.1% increase on 2013/14. 2014/15.

The Directors intend to continue the dividend policy of increasing the annual dividend by at least the rate of RPI inflation for the foreseeable future.

LOGO

 

 NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16 89Financial Statements
97


Financial Statements

    

Consolidated statement of financial position

as at 31 March

 

Consolidated statement of financial position

as at 31 March

 

   Notes   

2016

£m

   

2015

£m

 

 

 

Non-current assets

      

Goodwill

   9     5,315      5,145   

Other intangible assets

   10     887      802   

Property, plant and equipment

   11     43,364      40,723   

Other non-current assets

   12     82      80   

Pension assets

   22     410      121   

Financial and other investments

   13     482      330   

Investments in joint ventures and associates

   14     397      318   

Derivative financial assets

   15     1,685      1,539   

 

��

Total non-current assets

     52,622      49,058   

 

 

Current assets

      

Inventories and current intangible assets

   16     437      340   

Trade and other receivables

   17     2,472      2,836   

Financial and other investments

   13     2,998      2,559   

Derivative financial assets

   15     278      177   

Cash and cash equivalents

   18     127      119   

 

 

Total current assets

     6,312      6,031   

 

 

Total assets

     58,934      55,089   

 

 

Current liabilities

      

Borrowings

   19     (3,611)     (3,028)  

Derivative financial liabilities

   15     (337)     (635)  

Trade and other payables

   20     (3,285)     (3,292)  

Current tax liabilities

     (252)     (184)  

Provisions

   23     (236)     (235)  

 

 

Total current liabilities

     (7,721)     (7,374)  

 

 

Non-current liabilities

      

Borrowings

   19     (24,733)     (22,882)  

Derivative financial liabilities

   15     (1,732)     (1,764)  

Other non-current liabilities

   21     (2,071)     (1,919)  

Deferred tax liabilities

   6     (4,634)     (4,297)  

Pensions and other post-retirement benefit obligations

   22     (2,995)     (3,379)  

Provisions

   23     (1,483)     (1,500)  

 

 

Total non-current liabilities

     (37,648)     (35,741)  

 

 

Total liabilities

     (45,369)     (43,115)  

 

 

Net assets

     13,565      11,974   

 

 

Equity

      

Share capital

   24     447      443   

Share premium account

     1,326      1,331   

Retained earnings

     16,305      14,870   

Other equity reserves

   25     (4,523)     (4,682)  

 

 

Shareholders’ equity

     13,555      11,962   

Non-controlling interests

     10      12   

 

 

Total equity

     13,565      11,974   

 

 

The consolidated financial statements set out on pages 94 to 167 were approved by the Board of Directors on 18 May 2016 and were signed on its behalf by:

      Notes     

        2015

£m

  

        2014   

£m   

 
  

 

 
 

Non-current assets

 

Goodwill

 9     5,145   4,594    
 

Other intangible assets

 10     802   669    
 

Property, plant and equipment

 11     40,723   37,179    
 

Other non-current assets

 12     80   87    
 

Pension assets

 22     121   174    
 

Financial and other investments

 13     330   284    
 

Investments in joint ventures and associates

 14     318   351    
 

Derivative financial assets

 15     1,539   1,557    
  

 

 
 

Total non-current assets

 49,058        44,895    
  

 

 
 

Current assets

 

Inventories and current intangible assets

 16     340   268    
 

Trade and other receivables

 17     2,836   2,855    
 

Financial and other investments

 13     2,559   3,599    
 

Derivative financial assets

 15     177   413    
 

Cash and cash equivalents

 18     119   354    
  

 

 
 

Total current assets

 6,031   7,489    
  

 

 
 

Total assets

 55,089   52,384    
  

 

 
 

Current liabilities

 

Borrowings

 19     (3,028 (3,511)   
 

Derivative financial liabilities

 15     (635 (339)   
 

Trade and other payables

 20     (3,292 (3,031)   
 

Current tax liabilities

 (184 (168)   
 

Provisions

 23     (235 (282)   
  

 

 
 

Total current liabilities

 (7,374 (7,331)   
  

 

 
 

Non-current liabilities

 

Borrowings

 19     (22,882 (22,439)   
 

Derivative financial liabilities

 15     (1,764 (824)   
 

Other non-current liabilities

 21     (1,919 (1,841)   
 

Deferred tax liabilities

 6     (4,297 (4,082)   
 

Pensions and other post-retirement benefit obligations

 22     (3,379 (2,585)   
 

Provisions

 23     (1,500 (1,363)   
  

 

 
 

Total non-current liabilities

 (35,741 (33,134)   
  

 

 
 

Total liabilities

 (43,115 (40,465)   
  

 

 
 

Net assets

 11,974   11,919    
  

 

 
 

Equity

 

Share capital

 24     443   439    
 

Share premium account

 1,331   1,336    
 

Retained earnings

 14,870   14,895    
 

Other equity reserves

 25     (4,682 (4,759)   
  

 

 
 

Shareholders’ equity

 11,962   11,911    
 

Non-controlling interests

 12   8    
  

 

 
 

Total equity

 11,974   11,919    
  

 

 
 

 

The consolidated financial statements set out on pages 86 to 158 were approved by the Board of Directors on 20 May 2015 and were signed on its behalf by:

 

Sir Peter Gershon Chairman

Andrew Bonfield Finance Director

 

National Grid plc

Registered number: 4031152

 

   

  

  

  

  

Sir Peter GershonChairman

Andrew BonfieldFinance Director

National Grid plc

Registered number: 4031152

 

       9098National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements 


 

 

   Financial Statements

    

    

 

  Unaudited commentary on consolidated statement of financial position

The consolidated statement of financial position shows all of the Group’s assets and liabilities at the year end. As a capital-intensive business, we have significant amounts of physical assets and corresponding borrowings.

Goodwill and other intangible assets

Goodwill and intangibles increased by £684m£255m to £5,947m£6,202m as at 31 March 2015.2016. This increase primarily relates to foreign exchange movements of £602m£184m and software additions of £207m,£220m, partially offset by software amortisation of £121m.£147m.

Property, plant and equipment

Property, plant and equipment increased by £3,544m£2,641m to £40,723m£43,364m as at 31 March 2015.2016. This was principally due to capital expenditure of £3,263m£3,673m on the renewal and extension of our regulated networks and foreign exchange movements of £1,703m,£543m, offset by depreciation of £1,361m£1,468m in the year. See page 2224 for further details of our capital expenditure.

Investments and other non-current assets

Investments in joint ventures and associates, financial and other investments and other non-current assets have increased by £6m£233m to £728m.£961m. This is primarily due to a decreasean increase in investments in joint ventures of £33m, which includes dividends received of £79m, partially offset by our share of post-tax results for the year of £46m, more than offset bytogether with an increase in available-for-sale investments of £46m.£152m.

Inventories and current intangible assets, and trade and other receivables

Inventories and current intangible assets, and trade and other receivables have increaseddecreased by £53m£267m to £3,176m£2,909m as at 31 March 2015.2016. This is due to an increase in inventories and current intangible assets of £72m,£97m, more than offset by a net decrease in trade and other receivables of £19m.£364m. The £19m£364m decrease consists of an increase ina foreign exchange impact of £211m£57m due to the stronger US dollar against sterling andoffset by a decrease in the underlying balances of £229m,£421m, reflecting collection of large prior year balances, including LIPA MSA and Superstorm Sandy re-insurance receivables.high 2015 winter billings, coupled with the impact of the recent mild winter.

Trade and other payables

Trade and other payables have increaseddecreased by £261m£7m to £3,292m,£3,285m, primarily due to a foreign exchange impact of £48m more than offset by movements of £161min the US related to warmer weather and an increase in VAT liability following a change in regulations on wholesale gas and electricity trading.

Current tax balancesenergy billing settlements.

Current tax balances

Net current tax balances have decreasedincreased by £33m£51m to £124m£175m as at 31 March 2015.2016, which includes a £77m current tax asset in trade and other receivables (£60m current tax asset in 2014/15). This is primarily due to the tax payments made in 2014/152015/16 being only partially offset by a smaller current year tax charge.

Deferred tax balances

Deferred tax balances have increased by £215m£337m to £4,297m£4,634m as at 31 March 2015.2016. This was primarily due to the impact of the £299m£125m deferred tax creditcharge on actuarial losses (a £172mgains in reserves (£299m tax chargecredit in 2013/14)2014/15) and foreign exchange movements being offset by the impact of the reduction in the UK statutory tax rate, foreign exchange movements of £203m and the reduction in prior year charges.rate.

Provisions and other non-current liabilities

Provisions (both current and non-current) and other non-current liabilities increased by £168m£136m to £3,654m£3,790m as at 31 March 2015.2016.

Total provisions increaseddecreased by £90m£16m in the year. The underlying movements include additions of £105m£63m, primarily relating to an increase to the provision for the estimated environmental restoration and remediation costs for a number of sites and other provision increases of £57m,£33m, together with foreign exchange movements of £133m,£42m, offset by utilisation of £209m£200m in relation to all classes of provisions.

Net debt

Net debt is the aggregate of cash and cash equivalents, current financial and other investments, borrowings, and derivative financial assets and liabilities. See further analysis with the consolidated cash flow statement on page 92.100.

Net pension and other post-retirement obligations

A summary of the total UK and US assets and liabilities and the overall net IAS 19 (revised) accounting deficit is shown below:

 

Net plan liability 

UK

£m

 

US

£m

 

Total   

£m   

   

UK 

£m 

   

US 

£m 

   

Total 

£m 

 

 

 

As at 1 April 2014

 (753 (1,658 (2,411)   

As at 1 April 2015

   (672)     (2,586)     (3,258)  

Exchange movements

     (236 (236)      –      (81)     (81)  

Current service cost

 (70 (116 (186)      (74)     (147)     (221)  

Net interest cost

 (27 (74 (101)      (18)     (94)     (112)  

Curtailments and other

 (34 (27 (61)      (24)     (15)     (39)  

Actuarial gains/(losses)

   

Actuarial (losses)/gains

      

– on plan assets

 1,929   225   2,154       (18)     (320)     (338)  

– on plan liabilities

 (1,975 (950 (2,925)      552      325      877   

Employer contributions

 258   250   508       239      348      587   

 

 

As at 31 March 2015

  (672    (2,586    (3,258)   

As at 31 March 2016

   (15)     (2,570)     (2,585)  

 

 

Represented by:

         

Plan assets

 19,453   6,955   26,408       19,401      7,033      26,434   

Plan liabilities

 (20,125 (9,541 (29,666)      (19,416)     (9,603)     (29,019)  

 

 
  (672  (2,586  (3,258)      (15)     (2,570)     (2,585)  

 

 

The principal movements in net obligations during the year include net actuarial lossesgains of £771m£539m and employer contributions of £508m.£587m. Net actuarial lossesgains include actuarial lossesgains on plan liabilities of £2,746m£877m arising as a consequence of increasesdecreases in the UK real discount rate and the nominal discount rate in the US.US and experience gains reflecting liability experience throughout the year including the impact of pension increases being lower than assumed and some updates to the way a section of plan liabilities is estimated. This is partially offset by actuarial gainslosses of £2,154m£338m arising on plan assets.

assets resulting from actual asset returns being less than assumed returns which is based upon the discount rate at the start of the year.

Further information on our pension and other post-retirement obligations can be found in notes 22 and 29 to the consolidated financial statements.

Off balance sheet items

There were no significant off balance sheet items other than the contractual obligations shown in note 30(b) to the consolidated financial statements, and the commitments and contingencies discussed in note 27.

Through the ordinary course of our operations, we are party to various litigation, claims and investigations. We do not expect the ultimate resolution of any of these proceedings to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flows or financial position.

 

 

LOGO

 

 NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16 91Financial Statements99


Consolidated cash flow statement

for the years ended 31 March

         2016   2015   2014 
      Notes   £m   £m   £m 

Cash flows from operating activities

          

Total operating profit

     2(b   4,085     3,780     3,735  

Adjustments for:

          

Exceptional items and remeasurements

     4     11     83     (71

Depreciation, amortisation and impairment

       1,614     1,494     1,417  

Share-based payment charge

       22     20     20  

Gain on exchange of associate for available-for-sale investment

       (49          

Changes in working capital

       456     301     (59

Changes in provisions

       (90   (41   (150

Changes in pensions and other post-retirement benefit obligations

       (327   (270   (323

Cash flows relating to exceptional items

          (62   (17   (150

Cash generated from operations

       5,660     5,350     4,419  

Tax paid

          (292   (343   (400

Net cash inflow from operating activities

          5,368     5,007     4,019  

Cash flows from investing activities

          

Acquisition of investments

       (116        (4

Purchases of intangible assets

       (220   (207   (179

Purchases of property, plant and equipment

       (3,408   (3,076   (2,944

Disposals of property, plant and equipment

       4     9     4  

Dividends received from joint ventures

       72     79     38  

Interest received

       23     37     35  

Net movements in short-term financial investments

          (391   1,157     1,720  

Net cash flow used in investing activities

          (4,036   (2,001   (1,330

Cash flows from financing activities

          

Purchase of treasury shares

       (267   (338     

Proceeds from issue of treasury shares

       16     23     14  

Purchase of own shares

       (6   (7   (5

Proceeds received from loans

       2,726     1,534     1,134  

Repayment of loans

       (896   (2,839   (2,192

Net movements in short-term borrowings and derivatives

       (730   623     37  

Interest paid

       (834   (826   (901

Exceptional finance costs on the redemption of debt

            (152     

Dividends paid to shareholders

          (1,337   (1,271   (1,059

Net cash flow used in financing activities

          (1,328   (3,253   (2,972

Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

     26(a   4     (247   (283

Exchange movements

       4     24     (26

Net cash and cash equivalents at start of year

          116     339     648  

Net cash and cash equivalents at end of year1

     18     124     116     339  

1.  Net of bank overdrafts of £3m (2015: £3m; 2014: £15m).

100National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements


 

Financial Statements

 

Consolidated cash flow statement

    

for the years ended 31 March

 

          2015    2014    2013   
      Notes        £m    £m    £m   
  

 

 
 

Cash flows from operating activities

 

Total operating profit

 2(b)           3,780        3,735        3,749    
 

Adjustments for:

 

Exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries

 4        83    (71)   (110)   
 

Depreciation, amortisation and impairment

 1,494    1,417    1,361    
 

Share-based payment charge

 20    20    20    
 

Changes in working capital

 301    (59)   (410)   
 

Changes in provisions

 (41)   (150)   (53)   
 

Changes in pensions and other post-retirement benefit obligations

 (270)   (323)   (408)   
 

Cash flows relating to exceptional items

 (17)   (150)   (112)   
  

 

 
 

Cash generated from operations

 5,350    4,419    4,037    
 

Tax paid

 (343)   (400)   (287)   
  

 

 
 

Net cash inflow from operating activities

 5,007    4,019    3,750    
  

 

 
 

Cash flows from investing activities

 

Acquisition of investments

 –    (4)   (14)   
 

Proceeds from sale of investments in subsidiaries

 –    –    183    
 

Purchases of intangible assets

 (207)   (179)   (175)   
 

Purchases of property, plant and equipment

 (3,076)   (2,944)   (3,214)   
 

Disposals of property, plant and equipment

       32    
 

Dividends received from joint ventures

 79    38    21    
 

Interest received

 37    35    29    
 

Net movements in short-term financial investments

 1,157    1,720    (2,992)   
  

 

 
 

Net cash flow used in investing activities

 (2,001)   (1,330)   (6,130)   
  

 

 
 

Cash flows from financing activities

 

Purchase of treasury shares

 (338)   –    –    
 

Proceeds from issue of treasury shares

 23   14    19    
 

Purchase of own shares

 (7)   (5)   (6)   
 

Proceeds received from loans

 1,534    1,134    5,062    
 

Repayment of loans

 (2,839)   (2,192)   (1,210)   
 

Net movements in short-term borrowings and derivatives

 623    37    452    
 

Interest paid

 (826)   (901)   (792)   
 

Exceptional finance costs on the redemption of debt

 (152)   –    –    
 

Dividends paid to shareholders

 (1,271)   (1,059)   (810)   
  

 

 
 

Net cash flow (used in)/from financing activities

 (3,253)   (2,972)   2,715    
  

 

 
 

Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents

 26(a)       (247)   (283)   335    
 

Exchange movements

 24    (26)   14    
 

Net cash and cash equivalents at start of year

 339    648    299    
  

 

 
 

Net cash and cash equivalents at end of year1

 18        116    339    648    
  

 

 
 

 

1.  Net of bank overdrafts of £3m (2014: £15m; 2013: £23m).

 

 

 

       92


  Unaudited commentary on the consolidated cash flow statement

 

 

The consolidated cash flow statement shows how the cash balance has moved during the year. Cash inflows and outflows are presented to allow users to understand how they relate to the day-to-day operations of the business (Operating activities); the money that has been spent or earned on assets in the year, including acquisitions of physical assets or other businesses (Investing activities); and the cash raised from debt, share issues or share issuesbuybacks and other loan borrowings or repayments (Financing activities).

 

Reconciliation of cash flow to net debt

 

 

2015 

£m 

 

2014  

£m  

   2016  2015 

   £m  £m 

Cash generated from operations

  5,350    4,419       5,660   5,350  

Net capital expenditure

  (3,274)   (3,119)      (3,740 (3,274

 

Business net cash flow

  2,076    1,300       1,920   2,076  

Net interest paid (including exceptional interest)

  (941)   (866)      (811 (941

Tax paid

  (343)   (400)      (292 (343

Net acquisitions and disposals

  –    (4)   

Dividends paid

  (1,271)   (1,059)      (1,337 (1,271

Other cash movements

  (243)   47       (185 (243

Non-cash movements

  (2,003)   1,221       (705 (2,003

 

(Increase)/decrease in net debt

  (2,725)   239    

 

Increase in net debt

   (1,410 (2,725

Opening net debt

  (21,190)   (21,429)      (23,915 (21,190

 

Closing net debt

  (23,915)   (21,190)      (25,325 (23,915

 

Cash generated from operations

Cash generated from operations £m(£m)

 

LOGOLOGO

Cash flows from our operations are largely stable when viewed over the longer term. Our electricity and gas transmission and distribution operations in the UK are subject to multi-year rate agreements with regulators. In the UK, we have largely stable inter-year cash flows. However, in the US our short-term cash flows are dependent on the price of gas and electricity and the timing of customer payments. The regulatory mechanisms for recovering costs from customers can result in significant cash flow swings from year to year. Changes in volumes in the US, for example as a consequence of abnormally mild or extreme weather can affect revenues and hence, cash flows, particularly in the winter months.

For the year ended 31 March 2015,2016, cash flow from operations increased by £931m£310m to £5,350m.£5,660m.

Changes in working capital improved by £360m£155m over the prior year, principally in the US (£441m) due to the collection of high winter 20142015 billings and other settlements including Hurricane Sandy re-insurance claims and LIPA receipts. Cash outflows relatinglower closing balances due to exceptional items were £133m lower, as the prior year included reorganisation costs in the UK and LIPA MSA transition costs in the US.milder weather.

Net capital expenditure

Net capital expenditure in the year of £3,274m£3,740m was £155m£466m higher than the prior year. This was a result of higher spend in our US regulated businesses, reflecting a record year of investment, partially offset by lower spend in ourand UK regulated businesses. Further details of our capital expenditure can be seen on page 24.

Net interest paid

Net interest paid and exceptional finance costs in 2015/16 were £811m, £130m lower than 2014/15 were £941m, £75m higher than 2013/14primarily due to £152mprior year debt redemption cash outflows.

Tax paid

Tax paid in the year to 31 March 20152016 was £343m, £57m£292m, £51m lower than the prior year. This reflected the reduction in the UK corporation tax rate from 21% to 20%, partially offset by repayments received in the US duringin the period.prior year.

Dividends paid

Dividends paid in the year ended 31 March 20152016 amounted to £1,271m.£1,337m. This was £212m£66m higher than 2013/14,2014/15, reflecting the increase in the final dividend for the year ended 31 March 20142015 paid in August 2014,2015, together with a lower average scrip dividend take-up in the year.

Other cash movements

Other cash flows principally arise from dividends from joint ventures and movements in treasury shares, including the cost of repurchasing shares as part of the share buyback programme (£338m)

(£267m, £71m lower than the prior year).

Non-cash movements

The non-cash movements are predominantly due to the strengthening of the US dollar against sterling, resulting in movements in foreign exchange arising on net debt held in currencies other than sterling.US dollars. In the year, the dollar strengthened from $1.67 at 31 March 2014 to $1.49 at 31 March 2015.2015 to $1.44 at

31 March 2016.

Other non-cash movements are from changes in fair values of financial assets and liabilities and interest accretions and accruals.

Net debt

Net debt at 31 March£m(£m)

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO
 

 


 NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16 93Financial Statements
101


      Financial Statements

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

– analysis of items in the primary statements

 

1. Basis of preparation and recent accounting developments

 

 

Accounting policies describe our approach to recognising and measuring transactions and balances in the year. Accounting policies applicable across the financial statements are shown below. Accounting policies that are specific to a component of the financial statements have been incorporated into the relevant note.

 

This section also shows areas of judgement and key sources of estimation uncertainty in these financial statements. In addition, we summarise new EU endorsed accounting standards, amendments and interpretations and whether these are effective in 20152016 or later years, explaining how significant changes are expected to affect our reported results.

 

 

National Grid’s principal activities involve the transmission and distribution of electricity and gas in Great Britain and northeastern US. The Company is a public limited liability company incorporated and domiciled in England and Wales, with its registered office at 1–3 Strand, London WC2N 5EH.

The Company has its primary listing on the London Stock Exchange and is also quoted on the New York Stock Exchange.

These consolidated financial statements were approved for issue by the Board on 18 May 2016.

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Accounting Standards (IAS) and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and related interpretations as issued by the IASB and IFRS as adopted by the EU. They are prepared on the basis of all IFRS accounting standards and interpretations that are mandatory for periods ended 31 March 2016 and in accordance with the Companies Act 2006 applicable to companies reporting under IFRS and Article 4 of the EU IAS Regulation. The 2015 and 2014 comparative financial information has also been prepared on this basis.

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on an historical cost basis, except for the recording of pension assets and liabilities, the revaluation of derivative financial instruments and certain commodity contracts and investments classified as available-for-sale.

These consolidated financial statements are presented in pounds sterling, which is also the functional currency of the Company.

The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period (see accounting policy D).

A. Going concern

The Directors considered it appropriate to prepare the financial statements on a going concern basis. The going concern basis presumes that the Group has adequate resources to remain in operation, and that the Directors intend it to do so, for at least one year from the date the financial statements are signed.

B. Basis of consolidation

National Grid’s principal activities involve the transmission and distribution of electricity and gas in Great Britain and northeastern US. The Company is a public limited liability company incorporated and domiciled in England, with its registered office at 1-3 Strand, London WC2N 5EH.

The Company has its primary listing on the London Stock Exchange and is also quoted on the New York Stock Exchange.

These consolidated financial statements were approved for issue by the Board of Directors on 20 May 2015.

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Accounting Standards (IAS) and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and related interpretations as issued by the IASB and IFRS as adopted by the EU. They are prepared on the basis of all IFRS accounting standards and interpretations that are mandatory for periods ended 31 March 2015 and in accordance with the Companies Act 2006 applicable to companies reporting under IFRS and Article 4 of the EU IAS Regulation. The 2014 and 2013 comparative financial information has also been prepared on this basis.

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on an historical cost basis, except for the recording of pension assets and liabilities, the revaluation of derivative financial instruments and certain commodity contracts and investments classified as available-for-sale.

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis. The going concern basis presumes that the Group has adequate resources to remain in operation, and that the Directors intend it to do so, for at least one year from the date the financial statements are signed. Further details of the Directors’ assessment are set out on page 54.

These consolidated financial statements are presented in pounds sterling, which is also the functional currency of the Company.

The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period (see accounting policy C).

A. Basis of consolidation

The consolidated financial statements incorporate the financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries, together with a share of the results, assets and liabilities of jointly controlled entities (joint ventures) and associates using the equity method of accounting, where the investment is carried at cost plus post-acquisition changes in the share of net assets of the joint venture or associate, less any provision for impairment.

A subsidiary is defined as an entity controlled by the Company. Control is achieved where the Company has the power to affect the returns of an entity to which it is exposed or to which it has rights.

Losses in excess of the consolidated interest in joint ventures and associates are not recognised, except where the Company or its subsidiaries have made a commitment to make good those losses.

Where necessary, adjustments are made to bring the accounting policies used in the individual financial statements of the Company, subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates into line with those used by the Company in its consolidated financial statements under IFRS. Intercompany transactions are eliminated.

The results of subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates acquired or disposed of during the year are included in the consolidated income statement from the effective date of acquisition or up to the effective date of disposal, as appropriate.

Acquisitions are accounted for using the acquisition method, where the purchase price is allocated to the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed on a fair value basis and the remainder recognised as goodwill.

     94


 

102 1. Basis of preparationNational Grid Annual Report and recent accounting developmentscontinuedAccounts 2015/16Financial Statements


 

 

B. Foreign currencies   Financial Statements

1. Basis of preparation and recent accounting developmentscontinued

C. Foreign currencies

Transactions in currencies other than the functional currency of the Company or subsidiary concerned are recorded at the rates of exchange prevailing on the dates of the transactions. At each reporting date, monetary assets and liabilities that are denominated in foreign currencies are retranslated at closing exchange rates. Non-monetary assets are not retranslated unless they are carried at fair value.

Gains and losses arising on the retranslation of monetary assets and liabilities are included in the income statement, except where the adoption of hedge accounting requires inclusion in other comprehensive income – note 15.

On consolidation, the assets and liabilities of operations that have a functional currency different from the Company’s functional currency of pounds sterling, principally our US operations that have a functional currency of US dollars, are translated at exchange rates prevailing at the reporting date. Income and expense items are translated at the average exchange rates for the period where these do not differ materially from rates at the date of the transaction. Exchange differences arising are classified as equity and transferred to the consolidated translation reserve.

D. Areas of judgement and key sources of estimation uncertainty

The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Information about such judgements and estimations is contained in the notes to the financial statements, and the key areas are summarised below.

Areas of judgement that have the most significant effect on the amounts recognised in the financial statements are as follows:

Transactions in currencies other than the functional currency of the Company or subsidiary concerned are recorded at the rates of exchange prevailing on the dates of the transactions. At each reporting date, monetary assets and liabilities that are denominated in foreign currencies are retranslated at closing exchange rates. Non-monetary assets are not retranslated unless they are carried at fair value.
Gains and losses arising on the retranslation of monetary assets and liabilities are included in the income statement, except where the adoption of hedge accounting requires inclusion in other comprehensive income – note 15.
On consolidation, the assets and liabilities of operations that have a functional currency different from the Company’s functional currency of pounds sterling, principally our US operations that have a functional currency of dollars, are translated at exchange rates prevailing at the reporting date. Income and expense items are translated at the average exchange rates for the period where these do not differ materially from rates at the date of the transaction. Exchange differences arising are classified as equity and transferred to the consolidated translation reserve.
C. Areas of judgement and key sources of estimation uncertainty
The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Information about such judgements and estimations is contained in the notes to the financial statements, and the key areas are summarised below.
Areas of judgement that have the most significant effect on the amounts recognised in the financial statements are as follows:
 the categorisation of certain items as exceptional items and the definition of adjusted earnings – notes 4 and 7; and
 energy purchase contracts as being for normal purchase, sale or usage – note 27.27; and
 IFRS provides certain options available within accounting standards. Choices we have made,the recognition of surpluses in respect of defined benefit pension schemes – notes 22 and continue to make, include the following:29.

IFRS provides certain options available within accounting standards. Choices we have made, and continue to make, include the following:

 Presentational formats: we use the nature of expense method for our income statement and aggregate our statement of financial position to net assets and total equity. In the income statement, we present subtotals of total operating profit, profit before tax and profit from continuing operations, together with additional subtotals excluding exceptional items remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries.remeasurements. Exceptional items remeasurements and stranded cost recoveriesremeasurements are presented separately on the face of the income statement.

 Customer contributions: contributions received prior to 1 July 2009 towards capital expenditure are recorded as deferred income and amortised in line with the depreciation on the associated asset.

 Financial instruments: we normally opt to apply hedge accounting in most circumstances where this is permitted. For net investment hedges, we have chosen to use the spot rate method, rather than the alternative forward rate method.

Key sources of estimation uncertainty that have significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial year are as follows:

Key sources of estimation uncertainty that have significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial year are as follows:
 review of residual lives, carrying values and impairment charges for other intangible assets and property, plant and equipment – notes 10 and 11;
 estimation of liabilities for pensions and other post-retirement benefits – notes 22 and 29;
 valuation of financial instruments and derivatives – notes 15 and 30;
 revenue recognition and assessment of unbilled revenue – note 2; and
 environmental and decommissioning provisions – note 23.

In order to illustrate the impact that changes in assumptions could have on our results and financial position, we have included sensitivity analysis in note 33.

New IFRS accounting standards and interpretations adopted in 2015/16

The following standards, interpretations and amendments, issued by the IASB and by the IFRS Interpretations Committee (IFRIC), are effective for the year ended 31 March 2016. None of the pronouncements has had a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results or assets and liabilities for the year ended 31 March 2016.

 

In order to illustrate the impact that changes in assumptions could have on our results and financial position, we have included sensitivity analysis in note 33.

New IFRS accounting standards and interpretations adopted in 2014/15
The following standards, interpretations and amendments, issued by the IASB and by the IFRS Interpretations Committee (IFRIC), are effective for the year ended 31 March 2015. None of the pronouncements has had a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results or assets and liabilities for the year ended 31 March 2015.
 IFRIC 21 ‘Levies’Amendment to IAS 19 ‘Defined Benefit Plans: Employee Contributions’;
 amendmentsAnnual Improvements to IAS 32 ‘Financial Instruments: Presentation’ in respect of offsetting financial assetsIFRSs 2010-2012 Cycle; and financial liabilities;
 amendmentsAnnual Improvements to IFRS 10 ‘Consolidated Financial Statements’, IFRS 12 ‘Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities’ and IAS 27 ‘Separate Financial Statements’ in respect of investment entities;
amendments to IAS 36 ‘Impairment of Assets’ in respect of recoverable amount disclosures for non-financial assets; and
amendments to IAS 39 ‘Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement’, in respect of novation of derivatives and continuation of hedge accounting.IFRSs 2011-2013 Cycle.

 

LOGO

  NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16 95Financial Statements
103


       Financial Statements

    

    Notes to the consolidated financial statements

    – analysis of items in the primary statementscontinued

 

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

– analysis of items in the primary statements continued

    

    

1. Basis of preparation and recent accounting developmentscontinued

 

1. Basis of preparation and recent accounting developmentscontinued

New IFRS accounting standards and interpretations not yet adopted

The Company enters into a significant number of transactions that fall within the scope of IFRS 9 ‘Financial Instruments’ and IFRS 16 ‘Leases’, effective for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2018 and 1 January 2019 respectively, subject to EU endorsement. We are assessing the likely impact of these standards on the Company’s financial statements.

IFRS 15 ‘Revenue from Contracts with Customers’ was issued by the IASB in May 2014. Subject to EU endorsement, it is effective for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2018. The new standard provides enhanced detail on the principle of recognising revenue to reflect the transfer of goods and services to customers at a value which the Company expects to be entitled to receive.

The Group has completed an initial impact assessment of the new standard by completing a survey of all businesses identifying the likely impact of IFRS 15. This was a tailored questionnaire based on the known impacts of the new standard on power and utility companies. Whilst no material differences were identified as part of the questionnaire process, further follow-up work will be required to determine the impact, if any, on certain revenue items including, but not limited to, variable consideration contracts, take or pay arrangements and performance obligations where multiple goods or services are provided in individual contracts.

New IFRS accounting standards and interpretations not yet adopted

The Company enters into a significant number of transactions that fall within the scope of IFRS 9 ‘Financial Instruments’, effective for periods beginning after 1 January 2018. We are assessing the likely impact of this standard on the Company’s financial statements.
IFRS 15 ‘Revenue from Contracts with Customers’ was issued by the IASB in May 2014. Subject to EU endorsement, it is effective for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2017. The new standard provides enhanced detail on the principle of recognising revenue to reflect the transfer of goods and services to customers at a value which the Company expects to be entitled to receive.
The Group has completed an initial impact assessment of the new standard by completing a survey of all businesses identifying the likely impact of IFRS 15. This was a tailored questionnaire based on the known impacts of the new standard on power and utility companies. Whilst no material differences were identified as part of the questionnaire process, further follow-up work will be required to determine the impact, if any, on certain revenue items including, but not limited to, variable consideration contracts, take or pay arrangements and performance obligations where multiple goods or services are provided in individual contracts.
Other standards and interpretations or amendments thereto which have been issued, but are not yet effective, are not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

2. Segmental analysis

 

 

This note sets out the financial performance for the year split into the different parts of the business (operating segments). We monitor and manage the performance of these operating segments on a day-to-day basis.

 

Our strategy in action

We own a portfolio of businesses that range from businesses with high levels of investment and growth (such as UK Electricity Transmission) to cash generative developed assets with minimal investment requirements (such as National Grid Metering, included within Other activities).

 

We generate 95%the majority of our revenue from our regulated operating segments in the UK and US. We work with our regulators to obtain agreements that balance the risks we face with the opportunity to deliver reasonable returns for our investors. When investing in Other activities we aim to leverage our core capabilities to deliver higher returns for investors.

 

Our regulated businesses earn revenue for the transmission, distribution and generation services they have provided during the year. In any one year, the revenue recognised may differ from that allowed under our regulatory agreements and any such timing differences are adjusted through future prices. Our Other activities earn revenue in line with their contractual terms.

 

Revenue primarily represents the sales value derived from the generation, transmission and distribution of energy, together with the sales value derived from the provision of other services to customers. It excludes value added (sales) tax and intra-group sales.

Revenue includes an assessment of unbilled energy and transportation services supplied to customers between the date of the last meter reading and the year end. This is estimated based on historical consumption and weather patterns.
Where revenue exceeds the maximum amount permitted by a regulatory agreement, adjustments will be made to future prices to reflect this over-recovery. No liability is recognised, as such an adjustment relates to the provision of future services. Similarly no asset is recognised where a regulatory agreement permits adjustments to be made to future prices in respect of an under-recovery.
We present revenue and the results of the business analysed by operating segment, based on the information the Board of Directors uses internally for the purposes of evaluating the performance of operating segments and determining resource allocation between operating segments. The Board of Directors is National Grid’s chief operating decision-making body (as defined by IFRS 8 ‘Operating Segments’) and assesses the performance of operations principally on the basis of operating profit before exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries (see note 4).
There have been no changes to our reporting structure for the year ended 31 March 2015.

       96 


Revenue primarily represents the sales value derived from the generation, transmission and distribution of energy, together with the sales value derived from the provision of other services to customers. It excludes value added (sales) tax and intra-group sales.

Revenue includes an assessment of unbilled energy and transportation services supplied to customers between the date of the last meter reading and the year-end. This is estimated based on historical consumption and weather patterns.

Where revenue exceeds the maximum amount permitted by a regulatory agreement, adjustments will be made to future prices to reflect this over-recovery. No liability is recognised, as such an adjustment relates to the provision of future services. Similarly no asset is recognised where a regulatory agreement permits adjustments to be made to future prices in respect of an under-recovery. As part of our regulatory agreements we are entitled to recover certain costs directly from customers (pass through costs). These amounts are included in the overall calculation of revenue as stipulated by regulatory agreements and explained further on pages 176 to 182.

We present revenue and the results of the business analysed by operating segment, based on the information the Board of Directors uses internally for the purposes of evaluating the performance of operating segments and determining resource allocation between operating segments. The Board of Directors is National Grid’s chief operating decision-making body (as defined by IFRS 8 ‘Operating Segments’) and assesses the performance of operations principally on the basis of operating profit before exceptional items and remeasurements (see note 4).

There have been no changes to our reporting structure for the year ended 31 March 2016.

 

104 2. Segmental analysiscontinuedNational Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16
Financial Statements 


 

   Financial Statements

2. Segmental analysiscontinued

The following table describes the main activities for each operating segment:

 

UK Electricity Transmission High voltage electricity transmission networks in Great Britain.
  
UK Gas Transmission The gas transmission network in Great Britain and UK LNG storage activities.
  
UK Gas Distribution Four of the eight regional networks of Great Britain’s gas distribution system.
  
US Regulated Gas distribution networks, electricity distribution networks and high voltage electricity transmission networks in New York and New England and electricity generation facilities in New York.
  Other activities primarily relate to non-regulated businesses and other commercial operations not included within the above segments, including: the Great Britain-France electricity interconnector; UK based gas metering activities; UK property management; a UK LNG import terminal; US LNG operations; US unregulated transmission pipelines; together with corporate activities.

Sales between operating segments are priced considering the regulatory and legal requirements to which the businesses are subject. The analysis of revenue by geographical area is on the basis of destination. There are no material sales between the UK and US geographical areas.

  

(a) Revenue

 

      2015       2014       2013
      

Total

sales

£m

    Sales
between
segments
£m
   

Sales

to third
parties

£m

       

Total

sales

£m

     Sales
between
segments
£m
   

Sales

to third
parties

£m

       

Total

sales

£m

     Sales
between
segments
£m
   

Sales  

to third  
parties  
£m  

  

 

  

Operating segments:

                              
  

UK Electricity Transmission

  3,754     (12   3,742        3,387       (14   3,373        3,110       (15  3,095  
  

UK Gas Transmission

  1,022     (107   915        941       (104   837        1,118       (89  1,029  
  

UK Gas Distribution

  1,867     (43   1,824        1,898       (49   1,849        1,714       (47  1,667  
  

US Regulated

  7,986          7,986        8,040            8,040        7,918           7,918  
  

Other activities

  762     (28   734        736       (26   710        678       (28  650  
  

 

       15,391     (190   15,201        15,002       (193   14,809        14,538       (179  14,359  
  

 

  

Geographical areas:

                              
  

UK

         7,191              6,759             6,421  
  

US

         8,010              8,050             7,938  
  

 

           15,201              14,809             14,359  
  

 

Other activities primarily relate to non-regulated businesses and other commercial operations not included within the above segments, including: UK gas metering activities; the Great Britain-France Interconnector; UK property management; a UK LNG import terminal (National Grid Grain LNG Limited); US LNG operations; US unregulated transmission pipelines; together with corporate activities.

Sales between operating segments are priced considering the regulatory and legal requirements to which the businesses are subject. The analysis of revenue by geographical area is on the basis of destination. There are no material sales between the UK and US geographical areas.

(a) Revenue

 

LOGO
   2016     2015     2014 
       Sales  Sales         Sales  Sales         Sales  Sales 
   Total   between  to third     Total   between  to third     Total   between  to third 
   sales   segments  parties     sales   segments  parties     sales   segments  parties 
    £m   £m  £m      £m   £m  £m      £m   £m  £m 

Operating segments:

                 

UK Electricity Transmission

   3,977     (20  3,957      3,754     (12  3,742      3,387     (14  3,373  

UK Gas Transmission

   1,047     (109  938      1,022     (107  915      941     (104  837  

UK Gas Distribution

   1,918     (36  1,882      1,867     (43  1,824      1,898     (49  1,849  

US Regulated

   7,493         7,493      7,986         7,986      8,040         8,040  

Other activities

   876     (31  845       762     (28  734       736     (26  710  
    15,311     (196  15,115       15,391     (190  15,201       15,002     (193  14,809  

Geographical areas:

                 

UK

      7,522         7,191         6,759  

US

            7,593                8,010                8,050  
             15,115                15,201                14,809  

 

 NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16 97Financial Statements105


Notes to the consolidated financial statements

– analysis of items in the primary statements continued

2. Segmental analysiscontinued

(b) Operating profit

A reconciliation of the operating segments’ measure of profit to total profit before tax is provided below. Further details of the exceptional items and remeasurements are provided in note 4.

                         Before exceptional items       After exceptional items 
                         and remeasurements       and remeasurements 
                         2016   2015   2014       2016   2015   2014 
                              £m   £m   £m        £m   £m   £m 

Operating segments:

                              

UK Electricity Transmission

                  1,173     1,237     1,087        1,173     1,237     1,027  

UK Gas Transmission

                  486     437     417        486     437     406  

UK Gas Distribution

                  878     826     904        878     826     780  

US Regulated

                  1,185     1,164     1,125        1,196     1,081     1,388  

Other activities

                            374     199     131         352     199     134  
                             4,096     3,863     3,664         4,085     3,780     3,735  

Geographical areas:

                              

UK

                  2,889     2,820     2,723        2,867     2,820     2,531  

US

                            1,207     1,043     941         1,218     960     1,204  
                             4,096     3,863     3,664         4,085     3,780     3,735  

Reconciliation to profit before tax:

                              

Operating profit

                  4,096     3,863     3,664        4,085     3,780     3,735  

Finance income

                  22     36     36        22     36     36  

Finance costs

                  (1,035   (1,069   (1,144      (1,134   (1,234   (1,051

Share of post-tax results of joint ventures and associates

                            59     46     28         59     46     28  

Profit before tax

                            3,142     2,876     2,584         3,032     2,628     2,748  

 

(c) Capital expenditure

 

  

     Net book value of property,                                 
     plant and equipment and other                                 
     intangible assets       Capital expenditure       Depreciation and amortisation 
     2016     2015     2014       2016   2015   2014       2016   2015   2014 
      £m     £m     £m        £m   £m   £m        £m   £m   £m 

Operating segments:

                              

UK Electricity Transmission

     11,907       11,276       10,635        1,084     1,074     1,381        (390   (376   (343

UK Gas Transmission

     4,140       4,132       4,120        186     184     181        (178   (172   (172

UK Gas Distribution

     8,378       8,130       7,921        549     498     480        (298   (286   (271

US Regulated

     17,490       15,664       12,948        1,856     1,501     1,219        (535   (452   (419

Other activities

     2,336       2,323       2,224         218     213     180         (213   (196   (211
      44,251       41,525       37,848         3,893     3,470     3,441         (1,614   (1,482   (1,416

Geographical areas:

                              

UK

     25,914       25,073       24,285        1,952     1,864     2,155        (1,018   (983   (938

US

     18,337       16,452       13,563         1,941     1,606     1,286         (596   (499   (478
      44,251       41,525       37,848         3,893     3,470     3,441         (1,614   (1,482   (1,416

By asset type:

                              

Property, plant and equipment

     43,364       40,723       37,179        3,673     3,263     3,262        (1,467   (1,361   (1,289

Non-current intangible assets

     887       802       669         220     207     179         (147   (121   (127
      44,251       41,525       37,848         3,893     3,470     3,441         (1,614   (1,482   (1,416

Total non-current assets other than financial instruments and pension assets located in the UK and US were £26,261m and £23,784m respectively as at 31 March 2016 (31 March 2015: UK £25,278m, US £21,790m; 31 March 2014: UK £24,531m, US £18,349m).

106National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements


   Financial Statements

 

   Notes to the consolidated financial statements

   – analysis of items in the primary statementscontinued

  2. Segmental analysis continued
 
  (b) Operating profit
  

A reconciliation of the operating segments’ measure of profit to total profit before tax is provided below. Further details of the exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries are provided in note 4.

 

      

Before exceptional items,

            remeasurements and stranded             

cost recoveries

    

After exceptional items,

            remeasurements and stranded             

cost recoveries

      

2015   

£m   

  

2014   

£m   

  

2013   

£m   

    

2015   

£m   

  

2014   

£m   

  

2013   

£m   

  

 

  

Operating segments:

             
  

UK Electricity Transmission

  1,237    1,087    1,049     1,237    1,027    1,020  
  

UK Gas Transmission

  437    417    531     437    406    517  
  

UK Gas Distribution

  826    904    794     826    780    763  
  

US Regulated

  1,164    1,125    1,254     1,081    1,388    1,438  
  

Other activities

  199    131    11     199    134    11  
  

 

    3,863    3,664    3,639     3,780    3,735    3,749  
  

 

  

Geographical areas:

             
  

UK

  2,820    2,723    2,530     2,820    2,531    2,456  
  

US

  1,043    941    1,109     960    1,204    1,293  
  

 

    3,863    3,664    3,639     3,780    3,735    3,749  
  

 

  

Reconciliation to profit before tax:

             
  

Operating profit

  3,863    3,664    3,639     3,780    3,735    3,749  
  

Finance income

  36    36    30     36    36    30  
  

Finance costs

  (1,069)   (1,144)   (1,154)    (1,234)   (1,051)   (1,086) 
  

Share of post-tax results of joint ventures and associates

  46    28    18     46    28    18  
  

 

  

Profit before tax

  2,876    2,584    2,533     2,628    2,748    2,711  
  

 

 

 

(c) Capital expenditure, depreciation and amortisation

 

   Capital expenditure Depreciation and amortisation
   

2015  

£m  

2014  

£m  

2013  

£m  

 

2015  

£m  

2014  

£m  

2013  

£m  

  

 

  Operating segments:             
  

UK Electricity Transmission

  1,074    1,381    1,430     (376)   (343)   (323) 
  

UK Gas Transmission

  184    181    249     (172)   (172)   (162) 
  

UK Gas Distribution

  498    480    666     (286)   (271)   (261) 
  

US Regulated

  1,501    1,219    1,124     (452)   (419)   (430) 
  

Other activities

  213    180    217     (196)   (211)   (185) 
  

 

    3,470    3,441    3,686     (1,482)   (1,416)   (1,361) 
  

 

  

Geographical areas:

             
  

UK

  1,864    2,155    2,471     (983)   (938)   (902) 
  

US

  1,606    1,286    1,215     (499)   (478)   (459) 
  

 

    3,470    3,441    3,686     (1,482)   (1,416)   (1,361) 
  

 

  

By asset type:

             
  

Property, plant and equipment

  3,263    3,262    3,511     (1,361)   (1,289)   (1,260) 
  

Non-current intangible assets

  207    179    175     (121)   (127)   (101) 
  

 

    3,470    3,441    3,686     (1,482)   (1,416)   (1,361) 
  

 

 

 

Total non-current assets other than financial instruments, deferred tax assets and pension assets located in the UK and US were £25,278m and £21,790m respectively as at 31 March 2015 (31 March 2014: UK £24,531m, US £18,349m; 31 March 2013: UK £23,344m, US £19,340m).

       98


 

    

    

    

    

 

Unaudited commentary on the results of our principal operations by segment

As a business, we have three measures of operating profit that are used on a regular basis and disclosed in this Annual Report.

Statutory operating profit: This is operating profit as calculated under International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). Statutory operating profit by segment is shown in note 2 on page 98.106.

Adjusted operating profit: Adjusted operating profit (business performance) excludes items that if included could distort understanding of our performance for the year and the comparability between periods. Further details of items that are excluded in adjusted operating profit are shown in note 4 on page 103.111.

RegulatoryRegulated financial performance: This is particularly relevant for our UK operations and is a measure of operating profit that reflects the impact of the businesses’ regulatory arrangements when presenting financial performance.

Reconciliations between statutory and adjusted operating profit can be found on page 186.196. Reconciliations between adjusted operating profit and regulatoryregulated financial performance for UK Electricity Transmission, UK Gas Transmission and UK Gas Distribution can be found on page 100.108.

Commentary on segmental adjusted operating profit results

 

 

We have summarised the results of our principal operating segments here by segment to provide direct reference to the results as disclosed in note 2. This analysis has been prepared based on adjusted operating profit (operating profit before exceptional items remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries)remeasurements) as set out in note 2(b).

 

UK Electricity Transmission

For the year ended 31 March 2015,2016, revenue in the UK Electricity Transmission segment was £367m higher at £3,754m,increased by £223m to £3,977m, and adjusted operating profit increaseddecreased by £150m£64m to £1,237m.£1,173m.

Net regulated income afterThe revenue growth of £223m was principally due to the recovery of higher pass-through costs such as payments to other UK network owners and system balancing costs, and under-recoveries of allowed revenues in the prior year. This was £230m higher, principally reflecting increasespartly offset by reductions in allowed Transmission Owner revenues this year and a £43m benefit relating to legal settlements. Thissettlement received in 2014/15 that did not repeat this year. Net revenue (after deducting pass-through costs) was partially offset by under-recoveries of allowed revenue in the year of £89m compared with under-recoveries of £60m in the prior year.£14m higher. Regulated controllable costs were £14m£28m higher due to inflation organisational changeand salary growth, together with legal cost recoveries in the prior year, higher tower maintenance costs and additional tower maintenance costs.transformation costs associated with our System Operator business. Depreciation and amortisation was £33m£14m higher reflecting the continued capital investment programme (investment in the year was £1,074m).programme. Other costs were £4m£36m higher than prior year.year due to additional asset impairments this year and lower scrap and disposal proceeds.

Capital investment remained around the same level as last year at £1,084m.

UK Gas Transmission

Revenue in the UK Gas Transmission segment increased by £81m£25m in 2014/152015/16 to £1,022m£1,047m and adjusted operating profit increased by £20m£49m to £437m.£486m.

Net regulated income after pass-through costsRevenue was £42m£25m higher, principally due to earned gas permit and constraints management incentives. In addition, under-recoveriesover-recoveries of allowed revenuerevenues in the year of £18m

were £3m favourable to last year’s under-recoveries of £21m. Partially offsetting the revenue gains, regulatedyear. Regulated controllable costs were £8m£10m higher than last year, mainly as a result of additionalinflation, higher gas system operatorservice charges and organisational change costs. Depreciation costs relatingwere £6m higher due to EU work and some organisation change costs.

ongoing investment (investment in the year was £186m, similar to last year). Other operating costs were also £17m higher, including a £13m provision for decommissioning the Avonmouth LNG plant.

Capital investment remained around the same level as£19m lower than last year, at £184m.mostly reflecting additional costs in 2014/15 relating to the closure of LNG facilities.

UK Gas Distribution

UK Gas Distribution revenue decreasedincreased by £31m£51m in 2014/15the year to £1,867m,£1,918m, and adjusted operating profit decreasedincreased by £78m£52m to £826m.£878m.

Net regulated income after pass-throughRevenue was £51m higher, principally reflecting increased regulatory allowances. In part, these allowances were increased to compensate for expected increases in taxation costs was £11m lower, reflecting changes in allowed revenues fora change to the tax treatment of replacement expenditure (repex). Timing differences reduced net revenues by a further £16m, with £13m over-recoveries in 2014/15, compared with a £29m over-recovery in the prior year.expenditure. Regulated controllable costs were £22m£21m higher primarily due to inflation, recruitment, property costs and some organisation change costs.higher charges from our strategic partners to cover connections and winter resourcing. Depreciation and amortisation was £15m£12m higher reflecting the continued capital investmentmains replacement programme (investment in the year was £498m)£51m higher at £549m). OtherPass-through costs charged to customers were £11m lower this year, and other costs were £14m higher, reflecting a provision£23m lower than prior year, which included provisions for additional asset protection costs.

US Regulated

Revenue in our US Regulated businesses was £54m£493m lower in 2014/15 at £7,986m,£7,493m, while adjusted operating profit increased by £39m£21m to £1,164m.£1,185m.

The stronger US dollar increased operating profit in the year by £30m.£81m. Excluding the impact of foreign exchange net regulated income increasedrate movements, revenue decreased by £81m, reflecting increased revenue from existing rate plans, including capex trackers, together with additional income from gas customer growth, partially£1,051m, principally as a result of lower commodity costs passed on to customers and unfavourable timing of recoveries year over year, partly offset by higher revenue allowances under the impactNiagara Mohawk three year rate plan and the benefit of the end of LIPA management services activities (MSA)capex trackers. The reduction in December 2013. In addition, over-recoveries of allowed revenuesrevenue was mostly offset by a £1,027m reduction in the year of £30m were £20m favourable to last year’s over-recoveries of £10m. Regulated controllablepass-through costs increased by £17m excludingincurred (excluding the impact of foreign exchange,exchange). Regulated controllable costs reduced by £71m at constant currency, partly as a result of increasedlower gas leak and compliance work this year and additional costs incurred last year to improve data quality and bring regulatory filings up to date, partly offset by the cessation of costs associated with the LIPA MSA activities. Bad debtdate. Depreciation and amortisation costs were £62m£51m higher excluding the impactthis year at constant currency as a result of foreign exchange, following last year’s exceptionally cold winter. Thereongoing investment in our networks. Pension costs were no major storms affecting our operations£15m higher at constant currency due to changes in the years ended 31 March 2014 and 2015.actuarial discount rates, while other operating costs were £41m higher at constant currency including higher asset removal costs.

Our capital investment programme continues in the US, with a further £1,501m£1,856m invested in 2014/15,2015/16, including spend on gas leak reduction programmesmains replacement, gas customer growth and electricity capacity and reinforcement work.electric system reinforcement.

Other activities

Revenue in Other activities increased by £26m£114m to £762m£876m in the year ended 31 March 2015.2016. Adjusted operating profit was £68m£175m higher at £199m.£374m.

OperatingIn the US, adjusted operating profit was £143m higher, reflecting lower spend on upgrades to our finance systems which completed last year. In addition, we benefited from a £49m gain on disposal of our investment in the French interconnectorIroquois pipeline, and the deconsolidation of our investment in Clean Line. In the UK, adjusted operating profit was £18m£32m higher as a result of strong auction revenues this year. Inat the US, corporateFrench interconnector and other activities losses were £63m lower, mainly as a result of our finance system upgrade completing in the first half of this year.higher property sales. Capital investment in our Other activities was £33m higher at £213m.a similar level to last year at £218m.

 

LOGO

 

        NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15 99                                National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements107


     Financial Statements

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

– analysis of items in the primary statementscontinued

    

    

 

Unaudited commentary on the results of our principal operations by segmentcontinued

 

Commentary on UK regulated financial performance

 

 

The regulated financial performance calculation provides a measure of the performance of the regulated operations before the impacts of interest and taxation. It adjusts reported operating profit under IFRS to reflect the impact of the businesses’ regulatory arrangements when presenting financial performance.

 

Adjustments in calculating regulatory financial performance

The principal adjustments from reported operating profit to UK regulated financial performance are:

Movement in UK regulatory ‘IOUs’: Revenue related to performance in one year may be recovered in later years. Revenue may be recovered in one year but be required to be returned to customers in future years. IFRS recognises these revenues when they flow through invoices to customers and not in the period to which they relate.

Performance RAV: UK performance efficiencies are in part remunerated by the creation of additional RAV which is expected to result in future earnings under regulatory arrangements.

Pension adjustment: Cash payments against pension deficits in the UK are recoverable under regulatory contracts.

3% RAV indexation: Future UK revenuesrevenue allowances are expected to be set using an asset base adjusted for inflation. ThisThese will be billed in future periods and recognised under IFRS at that time. A 3% RPI inflation assumption is used, reflecting the long-run expectation.

UK deferredDeferred taxation adjustment: Future UK revenues are expected to recover cash taxation costcosts, including the unwinding of deferred taxation balances created in the current year.

Regulatory depreciation: US and UK regulated revenues include an allowance for a return of regulatory capital in accordance with regulatory assumed asset lives. This return does not form part of regulatory profit.

Fast/slow money adjustment: The regulatory remuneration of costs incurred is split between in year revenue allowances and the creation of additional RAV. This does not align with the classification of costs as operating costs and fixed asset additions under IFRS accounting principles.

UK Electricity Transmission

Regulated financial performance for UK Electricity Transmission increaseddecreased to £1,195m from £1,232m, from £1,066m, up 16%down 3%. The year on year movement reflected the higher opening regulated asset value and the higher achieved operational return on equity. There was alsoslight year-on-year decrease is principally a result of a one-off benefitlegal settlement of £56m from legal settlements. These were partially offset by a reduced price control ‘tracker’ cost of debt allowance.

Reconciliation of regulated financial

performance to operating profit

 2015
£m
  2014
£m
  %  
change  
 

 

 

Reported operating profit

  1,237    1,087    14   

Movement in regulatory ‘IOUs’

  (130  (19 

Deferred taxation adjustment

  88    53   

RAV indexation (average 3% long-run inflation)

  326    301   

Regulatory vs IFRS depreciation difference

  (352  (337 

Fast/slow money adjustment

  34    (2 

Pensions

  (48  (47 

Performance RAV created

  77    30   

 

 

Regulated financial performance

  1,232    1,066    16   

 

 

UK Gasincluded in last year’s results. Electricity Transmission

Regulated financial underlying performance for UK Gas Transmission increased to £648m from £552m, up 17%. This reflected improvedand operational return on equity mainly as a result of incentive performance, and the increase in underlying revenues associated with increased regulated asset value. This was partly offset by lower allowed cost of debt (2.72% real compared with 2.92% real in 2013/14).were broadly similar this year.

Reconciliation of regulated financial  2016  2015  % 
performance to operating profit  £m  £m  change 

Reported operating profit

   1,173    1,237    (5

Movement in regulatory ‘IOUs’

   (147  (130 

Deferred taxation adjustment

   80    88   

RAV indexation (average 3% long-run inflation)

   339    326   

Regulatory vs IFRS depreciation difference

   (368  (352 

Fast/slow money adjustment

   92    34   

Pensions

   (54  (48 

Performance RAV created

   80    77      

Regulated financial performance

   1,195    1,232    (3

UK Gas Transmission

Regulated financial performance for UK Gas Transmission decreased to £535m from £648m, down 17%. This reflected a lower operational return on equity, mainly as a result of the expiration of the gas permit incentive scheme.

 

  

     

Reconciliation of regulated financial  2016  2015  % 
performance to operating profit  £m  £m  change 

Reported operating profit

   486    437    11  

Movement in regulatory ‘IOUs’

   (80  (16 

Deferred taxation adjustment

   45    85   

RAV indexation (average 3% long-run inflation)

   166    166   

Regulatory vs IFRS depreciation difference

   (18  (22 

Fast/slow money adjustment

   18    54   

Pensions

   (77  (49 

Performance RAV created

   (5  (7    

Regulated financial performance

   535    648    (17

UK Gas Distribution

Regulated financial performance for UK Gas Distribution was unchanged at £819m. This reflects similar achieved operational return on equity year-on-year, with the benefit of a higher asset base being offset by lower allowed cost of debt.

 

  

     

Reconciliation of regulated financial  2016  2015  % 
performance to operating profit  £m  £m  change 

Reported operating profit

   878    826    6  

Movement in regulatory ‘IOUs’

   (35  (28 

Deferred taxation adjustment

   (34  60   

RAV indexation (average 3% long-run inflation)

   255    255   

Regulatory vs IFRS depreciation difference

   (104  (148 

Fast/slow money adjustment

   (168  (182 

Pensions

   (13  (5 

Performance RAV created

   40    41      

Regulated financial performance

   819    819      

 

Reconciliation of regulated financial

performance to operating profit

2015
£m
 2014
£m
 %  
change  
 

 

 

Reported operating profit

   437    417      

Movement in regulatory ‘IOUs’

   (16  (28 

Deferred taxation adjustment

   85    12   

RAV indexation (average 3% long-run inflation)

   166    162   

Regulatory vs IFRS depreciation difference

   (22  (2 

Fast/slow money adjustment

   54    44   

Pensions

   (49  (46 

Performance RAV created

   (7  (7 

 

 

Regulated financial performance

   648    552    17   

 

 

UK Gas Distribution

Regulated financial performance for UK Gas Distribution decreased to £819m from £855m. The year on year movement in regulated financial performance reflected an increase in underlying revenues associated with increased regulated asset value, more than offset by lower allowed cost of debt and a slightly reduced achieved return on equity.

Reconciliation of regulated financial

performance to operating profit

2015
£m
 2014
£m
 

%  

change  

 

 

 

Reported operating profit

   826    904    (9)   

Movement in regulatory ‘IOUs’

   (28  (59 

Deferred taxation adjustment

   60    85   

RAV indexation (average 3% long-run inflation)

   255    252   

Regulatory vs IFRS depreciation difference

   (148  (149 

Fast/slow money adjustment

   (182  (197 

Pensions

   (5  (9 

Performance RAV created

   41    28   

 

 

Regulated financial performance

   819    855    (4)   

 

 
 

 

     100108National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements 


   

3. Operating costs

 

  

 
   

 

Below we have presented separately certain items included in our operating costs. These include a breakdown of payroll costs (including disclosure of amounts paid to key management personnel) and fees paid to our auditors.

 

   

 
 
   

Rentals under operating leases are charged to the income statement on a straight-line basis over the term of the relevant lease.

 

   

 
        

Before exceptional items,
        remeasurements and stranded        

cost recoveries

     

Exceptional items,

        remeasurements and stranded        

cost recoveries

     Total
        

2015

£m

   

2014

£m

   

2013

£m

     

2015

£m

   

20141

£m

  

20131

£m

     

2015

£m

  20141
£m
  20131   
£m   
   

 

   

Depreciation and amortisation

   1,482     1,416     1,361                     1,482    1,416   1,361  
   

Payroll costs

   1,459     1,373     1,434           (155  26      1,459    1,218   1,460  
   

Purchases of electricity

   1,615     1,513     1,251      70     (49  (111    1,685    1,464   1,140  
   

Purchases of gas

   1,403     1,722     1,384      13     33    (69    1,416    1,755   1,315  
   

Rates and property taxes

   1,004     963     969                     1,004    963   969  
   

Balancing Services Incentive Scheme

   874     872     805                     874    872   805  
   

Payments to other UK network owners

   801     630     487                     801    630   487  
   

Other

   2,700     2,656     3,029           100    44      2,700    2,756   3,073  
   

 

      11,338     11,145     10,720      83     (71  (110    11,421    11,074   10,610  
   

 

   

Operating costs include:

  

             
   

Inventory consumed

  

          365    422   389  
   

Operating leases

  

            98    115   109  
   

Research and development expenditure

  

            23    12   15  
   

 

 

 

1. Comparatives have been represented on a basis consistent with the current year presentation.

  

 
 

(a) Payroll costs

 

                  

2015

£m

 

20141

£m

 

20131   

£m   

   

 

   

Wages and salaries2

  

            1,598    1,377   1,597  
   

Social security costs

  

            129    126   120  
   

Other pension costs (note 22)

  

            224    229   234  
   

Share-based payment

  

            20    20   20  
   

Severance costs (excluding pension costs)

  

          4    30   16  
   

 

                   1,975    1,782   1,987  
   

Less: payroll costs capitalised

  

          (516  (564 (527) 
   

 

                   1,459    1,218   1,460  
   

 

 

 

1. Comparatives have been represented on a basis consistent with the current year presentation.

2. Included within wages and salaries are US other post-retirement benefit costs of £39m (2014: £44m; 2013: £43m); a curtailment gain on LIPA MSA transaction of £nil (2014: £198m; 2013: £nil) and a curtailment loss following disposal of businesses of £nil (2014: £nil; 2013: £1m). For further information refer to note 22.

    

     

 
 

(b) Number of employees

  

           31 March
2015
 Monthly
average
2015
 31 March
2014
  Monthly
average
2014
 31 March
2013
 Monthly   
average   
2013  
   

 

   

UK

          9,701     9,670    9,693      9,641    9,990   9,816  
   

US

          14,573     14,434    14,216      15,094    15,438   15,555  
   

 

             24,274     24,104    23,909      24,735    25,428   25,371  
   

 

 
 The vast majority of employees in the US are either directly or indirectly employed in the transmission, distribution and generation of electricity or the distribution of gas, while those in the UK are either directly or indirectly employed in the transmission and distribution of gas or the transmission of electricity. At 31 March 2015, there were 2,131 (2014: 2,044; 2013: 2,151) employees in other operations, excluding shared services.     
 
 

LOGO

            NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15101                                 


 

Financial Statements

 

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

3. Operating costs

– analysis of items in the primary statementscontinued

 

Below we have presented separately certain items included in our operating costs. These include a breakdown of payroll costs (including disclosure of amounts paid to key management personnel) and fees paid to our auditors.

Rentals under operating leases are charged to the income statement on a straight-line basis over the term of the relevant lease.

 

  3. Operating costscontinued  
 
  (c) Key management compensation  
      2015
£m
   

2014

£m

   

2013 

£m 

 
  

 

 
  

Short-term employee benefits

   10     9       
  

Post-employment benefits

   9     1       
  

Share-based payment

   4     5       
  

 

 
     23     15     16   
  

 

 
 
 Key management compensation relates to the Board of Directors, including the Executive Directors and Non-executive Directors for the years presented.   
 
 (d) Directors’ emoluments  
 Details of Directors’ emoluments are contained in the audited part of the Remuneration Report on page 69, which forms part of these financial statements.   
 
 (e) Auditors’ remuneration  
 Auditors’ remuneration is presented below in accordance with the requirements of the UK Companies Act 2006 and the principal accountant fees and services disclosure requirements of Item 16C of Form 20-F:   
   2015
£m
 20141
£m
 2013 
£m 
 
  

 

 
  

Audit fees2payable to the parent Company’s auditors and their associates in respect of:

      
  

Audit of the parent Company’s individual and consolidated financial statements

   1.3     0.9     1.1   
  

The auditing of accounts of any associate of the Company

   8.1     9.2     6.0   
  

Other services supplied3

   3.3     3.2     2.7   
  

 

 
     12.7     13.3     9.8   
  

 

 
  

Total other services4

      
  

Tax fees5:

      
  

Tax compliance services

   0.4     0.5     0.5   
  

Tax advisory services

   0.1     0.3     0.3   
  

All other fees6:

      
  

Other assurance services

   0.1     0.1     0.1   
  

Services relating to corporate finance transactions not covered above

             0.3   
  

Other non-audit services not covered above

   0.3     0.8     1.1   
  

 

 
     0.9     1.7     2.3   
  

 

 
  

Total auditors’ remuneration

   13.6     15.0     12.1   
  

 

 
 
 

1. The audit fees for the year ended 31 March 2014 have been restated to reflect the final audit fee following completion of the statutory audit process.

2. Audit fees in each year represent fees for the audit of the Company’s financial statements and regulatory reporting for the years ended 31 March 2015, 2014 and 2013, and the review of interim financial statements for the six month periods ended 30 September 2014, 2013 and 2012 respectively.

3. Other services supplied represent fees payable for services in relation to other statutory filings or engagements that are required to be carried out by the auditors. In particular, this includes fees for reports under section 404 of the US Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002 (Sarbanes-Oxley) and audit reports on regulatory returns.

4. There were no audit related fees as described in Item 16C(b) of Form 20-F.

5. Tax fees include amounts charged for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.

6. All other fees include amounts relating to market research on the metering industry and sundry services, all of which have been subject to approval by the Audit Committee. Total other fees for the year ended 31 March 2015 were £0.4m (2014: £0.9m; 2013: £1.5m).

    

     

     

    

    

     

 
 

In addition, fees of £0.2m were incurred in 2015 in relation to the audits of the pension schemes of the Company (2014: £0.1m; 2013: £0.1m).

   

 
 

Subject to the Company’s Articles of Association and the Companies Act 2006, the Audit Committee is solely and directly responsible for the approval of the appointment, reappointment, compensation and oversight of the Company’s independent auditors. It is our policy that the Audit Committee must approve in advance all non-audit work in excess of £50,000 to be performed by the independent auditors to ensure that the service will not compromise auditor independence. The Committee has delegated the approval in advance for all non-audit work below this level to the Finance Director. Certain services are prohibited from being performed by the external auditors under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002.

 

 

 

 

 

       

   Before exceptional items     Exceptional items             
   and remeasurements     and remeasurements     Total 
   2016   2015   2014     2016  2015   2014     2016  2015  2014 
    £m   £m   £m      £m  £m   £m      £m  £m  £m 

Depreciation and amortisation

   1,614     1,482     1,416                     1,614    1,482    1,416  

Payroll costs

   1,506     1,459     1,373               (155    1,506    1,459    1,218  

Purchases of electricity

   1,304     1,615     1,513      8    70     (49    1,312    1,685    1,464  

Purchases of gas

   1,003     1,403     1,722      (19  13     33      984    1,416    1,755  

Rates and property taxes

   1,050     1,004     963                     1,050    1,004    963  

Balancing Services Incentive Scheme

   907     874     872                     907    874    872  

Payments to other UK network owners

   971     801     630                     971    801    630  

Other

   2,664     2,700     2,656       22         100       2,686    2,700    2,756  
    11,019     11,338     11,145       11    83     (71     11,030    11,421    11,074  

Operating costs include:

                 

Inventory consumed

                303    365    422  

Operating leases

                99    98    115  

Research and development expenditure

                                    29    23    12  

 

(a) Payroll costs

 

                 
                              2016  2015  20141 
                                       £m  £m  £m  

Wages and salaries1

                1,720    1,598    1,377  

Social security costs

                137    129    126  

Other pension costs (note 22)

                238    224    229  

Share-based payment

                22    20    20  

Severance costs (excluding pension costs)

                                    5    4    30  
                2,122    1,975    1,782  

Less: payroll costs capitalised

                                    (616  (516  (564
                                     1,506    1,459    1,218  

 

1.  Included within wages and salaries are US other post-retirement benefit costs of £52m (2015: £39m; 2014: £44m) and a curtailment gain on LIPA MSA transaction of £nil (2015: £nil; 2014: £198m).  For further information refer to note 22.

 

(b) Number of employees

 

     

  

                    

Monthly

         Monthly     Monthly 
                 

31 March

  

average

   

31 March

     average  31 March  average 
                      

2016

  

2016

   

2015

      2015  2014  2014 

UK

          10,238    10,035     9,701      9,670    9,693    9,641  

US

                    14,830    14,775     14,573       14,434    14,216    15,094  
                     25,068    24,810     24,274       24,104    23,909    24,735  

The vast majority of employees in the US are either directly or indirectly employed in the transmission, distribution and generation of electricity or the distribution of gas, while those in the UK are either directly or indirectly employed in the transmission and distribution of gas or the transmission of electricity. At 31 March 2016, there were 2,232 (2015: 2,131; 2014: 2,044) employees in other operations, excluding shared services.

 

       102National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements109


Notes to the consolidated financial statements

– analysis of items in the primary statements continued

3. Operating costscontinued

(c) Key management compensation

     2016     2015     2014 
      £m     £m     £m 

Short-term employee benefits

     9       10       9  

Post-employment benefits

     1       9       1  

Share-based payment

     4       4       5  
      14       23       15  

 

Key management compensation relates to the Board, including the Executive Directors and Non-executive Directors for the years presented.

 

(d) Directors’ emoluments

Details of Executive Directors’ emoluments are contained in the audited part of the Remuneration Report on page 75 and those of Non-executive Directors on page 78.

 

(e) Auditors’ remuneration

Auditors’ remuneration is presented below in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006 and the principal accountant fees and services disclosure requirements of Item 16C of Form 20-F:

 

  

  

   

  

   

     2016     2015     2014 
      £m     £m     £m 

Audit fees1 payable to the parent Company’s auditors and their associates in respect of:

            

Audit of the parent Company’s individual and consolidated financial statements

     1.3       1.3       0.9  

The auditing of accounts of any associate of the Company

     9.2       8.1       9.2  

Other services supplied2

     3.6       3.3       3.2  
      14.1       12.7       13.3  

Total other services3

            

Tax fees4:

            

Tax compliance services

     0.5       0.4       0.5  

Tax advisory services

            0.1       0.3  

All other fees5:

            

Other assurance services

     4.3       0.1       0.1  

Services relating to corporate finance transactions not covered above

     1.6                

Other non-audit services not covered above

     2.5       0.3       0.8  
      8.9       0.9       1.7  

Total auditors’ remuneration

     23.0       13.6       15.0  

1. Audit fees in each year represent fees for the audit of the Company’s financial statements and regulatory reporting for the years ended 31 March 2016, 2015 and 2014, and the review of interim  financial statements for the six month periods ended 30 September 2015, 2014 and 2013 respectively.
2. Other services supplied represent fees payable for services in relation to other statutory filings or engagements that are required to be carried out by the auditors. In particular, this includes fees for  reports under section 404 of the US Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002 (Sarbanes-Oxley) and audit reports on regulatory returns.
3. There were no audit related fees as described in Item 16C(b) of Form 20-F.
4. Tax fees include amounts charged for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.
5. All other fees include amounts incurred in respect of the potential disposal of a majority stake in the Gas Distribution business (vendor due diligence and separation support), as well as data  assurance work in respect of financial information included in US rate filings all of which have been subject to approval by the Audit Committee. Total other fees for the year ended 31 March 2016  were £8.4m (2015: £0.4m; 2014: £0.9m).

PwC has contracted with Ofgem to assess the UK gas industry’s readiness for the introduction of new settlement processes and systems. Fees for these services are paid by Xoserve Limited, a subsidiary of National Grid, on behalf of the industry, under instruction from Ofgem. As PwC has no contract with or duty of care to Xoserve Limited, these amounts are not included above.

In addition, fees of £0.1m were incurred in 2016 in relation to the audits of the pension schemes of the Company (2015: £0.2m; 2014: £0.1m).

Subject to the Company’s Articles of Association and the Companies Act 2006, the Audit Committee is solely and directly responsible for the approval of the appointment, reappointment, compensation and oversight of the Company’s independent auditors. It is our policy that the Audit Committee must approve in advance all non-audit work in excess of £50,000 to be performed by the independent auditors to ensure that the service will not compromise auditor independence. The Audit Committee has delegated the approval in advance for all non-audit work below this level, up to a maximum of 5% of the total audit fee, to the Finance Director. Certain services are prohibited from being performed by the external auditors under Sarbanes-Oxley. All of the above services were pre-approved pursuant to this policy.

110National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements 


 

   Financial Statements

 

 

4. Exceptional items and remeasurements

 

4. Exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries

 

To monitor our financial performance, we use a profit measure that excludes certain income and expenses. We call that measure ‘business performance’ or ‘adjusted profit’. We exclude items from business performance because, if included, these items could distort understanding of our performance for the year and the comparability between periods. This note analyses these items, which are included in our results for the year but are excluded from business performance.

 

 
Our financial performance is analysed into two components: business performance, which excludes exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries; and exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries. Business performance is used by management to monitor financial performance as it is considered that it improves the comparability of our reported financial performance from year to year. Business performance subtotals are presented on the face of the income statement or in the notes to the financial statements.
Items of income or expense that are considered by management for designation as exceptional items include such items as significant restructurings, write-downs or impairments of non-current assets, significant changes in environmental or decommissioning provisions, integration of acquired businesses, gains or losses on disposals of businesses or investments and significant debt redemption costs as a consequence of transactions such as significant disposals or issues of equity.
Costs arising from restructuring programmes include redundancy costs. Redundancy costs are charged to the income statement in the year in which a commitment is made to incur the costs and the main features of the restructuring plan have been announced to affected employees.

Our financial performance is analysed into two components: business performance, which excludes exceptional items and remeasurements; and exceptional items and remeasurements. Business performance is used by management to monitor financial performance as it is considered that it improves the comparability of our reported financial performance from year to year. Business performance subtotals are presented on the face of the income statement or in the notes to the financial statements.

Management utilises an exceptional items framework that has been discussed and approved by the Group Audit Committee. This follows a three-step process which considers the nature of the event, the financial materiality involved and any particular facts and circumstances. In considering the nature of the event, management focuses on whether the event is within the Group’s control and how frequently such an event typically occurs. In determining the facts and circumstances management considers factors such as ensuring consistent treatment between favourable and unfavourable transactions, precedent for similar items, number of periods over which costs will be spread or gains earned and the commercial context for the particular transaction.

Items of income or expense that are considered by management for designation as exceptional items include such items as significant restructurings, write-downs or impairments of non-current assets, significant changes in environmental or decommissioning provisions, integration of acquired businesses, gains or losses on disposals of businesses or investments and significant debt redemption costs as a consequence of transactions such as significant disposals or issues of equity.

Costs arising from restructuring programmes include redundancy costs. Redundancy costs are charged to the income statement in the year in which a commitment is made to incur the costs and the main features of the restructuring plan have been announced to affected employees.

Remeasurements comprise gains or losses recorded in the income statement arising from changes in the fair value of commodity contracts and of derivative financial instruments to the extent that hedge accounting is not achieved or is not effective. These fair values increase or decrease because of changes in commodity and financial indices and prices over which we have no control.

Stranded cost recoveries represent the recovery, through charges to electricity customers in upstate New York and New England, of historical generation-related costs, related to generation assets that are no longer owned by National Grid. Such costs have been recovered from customers as permitted by regulatory agreements, which was completed by 31 March 2013.

 

LOGO
     2016     2015     2014 
      £m     £m     £m 

Included within operating profit

            

Exceptional items:

            

Transaction costs

     (22              

Restructuring costs

                   (136

Gas holder demolition costs

                   (79

LIPA MSA transition

                   254  

Other

                   16  
     (22            55  

Remeasurements – commodity contracts

     11       (83     16  
      (11     (83     71  

Included within finance costs

            

Exceptional items:

            

Debt redemption costs

            (131       

Remeasurements – net (losses)/gains on derivative financial instruments

     (99     (34     93  
      (99     (165     93  

Total included within profit before tax

     (110     (248     164  

Included within tax

            

Exceptional credits/(charges) arising on items not included in profit before tax:

            

Deferred tax credit arising on the reduction in the UK corporation tax rate

     296       6       398  

Deferred tax charge arising from an increase in US state income tax rates

                   (8

Tax on exceptional items

     4       28       (57

Tax on remeasurements

     15       44       (36
      315       78       297  

Total exceptional items and remeasurements after tax

     205       (170     461  

Analysis of total exceptional items and remeasurements after tax

            

Exceptional items after tax

     278       (97     388  

Remeasurements after tax

     (73     (73     73  

Total exceptional items and remeasurements after tax

     205       (170     461  

Further detail of operating exceptional items specific to 2015/16

In November 2015, the Group announced that it was considering disposing of a majority stake in its UK Gas Distribution business. In the year ended 31 March 2016, sale preparation costs of £22m were recognised in respect of this potential transaction. These costs have been treated as exceptional, achieving a consistent presentation with the expected treatment of the transaction on completion.

Further detail of operating exceptional items in respect of previous years

Debt redemption costs in the year ending 31 March 2015 represents costs arising from a liability management programme. We reviewed and restructured the Group debt portfolio following the commencement of the RIIO price controls in 2013 and the slow down in our planned UK capital investment programme as the industry assessed the impact of Electricity Market Reform.

£16m was received in year ending 31 March 2014 following the sale to a third party of a settlement award which arose as a result of a legal ruling in 2008. The business to which this item related had previously been treated as discontinued.

 

        NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15103
National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements111


     Financial Statements

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

– analysis of items in the primary statements continued

4. Exceptional items and remeasurementscontinued

Remeasurements

Commodity contracts represent mark-to-market movements on certain physical and financial commodity contract obligations in the US. These contracts primarily relate to the forward purchase of energy for supply to customers, or to the economic hedging thereof, that are required to be measured at fair value and that do not qualify for hedge accounting. Under the existing rate plans in the US, commodity costs are recoverable from customers although the timing of recovery may differ from the pattern of costs incurred.

Net (losses)/gains on derivative financial instruments comprise (losses)/gains arising on derivative financial instruments reported in the income statement. These exclude gains and losses for which hedge accounting has been effective, which have been recognised directly in other comprehensive income or which are offset by adjustments to the carrying value of debt. The tax charge in the year includes a credit of £1m (2015: £1m credit; 2014: £nil) in respect of prior years.

Items included within tax

The Finance No. 2 Bill 2015 included a reduction in the UK corporation tax rate from 20% to 19% for the year beginning 1 April 2017, with a further reduction from 19% to 18% for the year beginning 1 April 2020.

The Finance Act 2013 enacted reductions in the UK corporation tax rate from 23% to 21% from 1 April 2014, and from 21% to 20% from

1 April 2015. Other UK tax legislation also reduced the UK corporation tax rate in prior periods (2013: from 24% to 23%). These reductions have resulted in decreases to UK deferred tax liabilities in these periods.

5. Finance income and costs

 

This note details the interest income generated by our financial assets and interest expense incurred on our financial liabilities. It also includes the expected return on our pensions and other post-retirement assets, which is offset by the interest payable on pensions and other post-retirement obligations and presented on a net basis. In reporting business performance, we adjust net financing costs to exclude any net gains or losses on derivative financial instruments included in remeasurements. In addition, the prior year debt redemption costs have been treated as exceptional (see note 4).

 

     2016     2015     2014 
      £m     £m     £m 

Finance income

            

Interest income on financial instruments:

            

Bank deposits and other financial assets

     22       28       22  

Gains on disposal of available-for-sale investments

            8       14  
      22       36       36  

Finance costs

            

Net interest on pensions and other post-retirement benefit obligations

     (112     (101     (128

Interest expense on financial liabilities held at amortised cost:

            

Bank loans and overdrafts

     (38     (45     (61

Other borrowings

     (940     (984     (1,106

Derivatives

     43       56       79  

Unwinding of discount on provisions

     (73     (73     (73

Other interest

     (27     (8     (3

Less: interest capitalised1

     112       86       148  
      (1,035     (1,069     (1,144

Exceptional items

            

Debt redemption costs

            (131       

Remeasurements

            

Net gains/(losses) on derivative financial instruments included in remeasurements2:

            

Ineffectiveness on derivatives designated as:

            

Fair value hedges3

     39       36       22  

Cash flow hedges

     (15     (13     4  

Net investment hedges

            2       38  

Net investment hedges – undesignated forward rate risk

     (34     33       (7

Derivatives not designated as hedges or ineligible for hedge accounting

     (89     (92     36  
      (99     (165     93  
      (1,134     (1,234     (1,051
            

Net finance costs

     (1,112     (1,198     (1,015

 

  4 . Exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveriescontinued   
              2015
£m
          2014
£m
          2013    
£m    
  

 

  

Included within operating profit

    
  

Exceptional items:

    
  

Restructuring costs1

       (136 (87)  
  

Gas holder demolition costs2

       (79 –   
  

LIPA MSA transition3

       254   –   
  

Other4

       16   –   
  

Net gain on disposal of businesses5

          3   
  

 

         55   (84)  
  

Remeasurements – commodity contracts6

   (83  16   180   
  

Stranded cost recoveries7

          14   
  

 

     (83  71   110   
  

 

  

Included within finance costs

    
  

Exceptional items:

    
  

Debt redemption costs8

   (131     –   
  

Remeasurements – net (losses)/gains on derivative financial instruments9

   (34  93   68   
  

 

     (165  93   68   
  

 

  

Total included within profit before tax

   (248  164   178   
  

 

 
  

Included within tax

    
  

Exceptional credits/(charges) arising on items not included in profit before tax:

    
  

Deferred tax credit arising on the reduction in the UK corporation tax rate10

   6    398   128   
  

Deferred tax charge arising from an increase in US state income tax rates11

       (8 –   
  

Tax on exceptional items

   28    (57 31   
  

Tax on remeasurements6,8

   44    (36 (92)  
  

Tax on stranded cost recoveries

          (5)  
  

 

     78    297   62   
  

 

  

Total exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries after tax

   (170  461   240   
  

 

  

Analysis of total exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries after tax

    
  

Exceptional items after tax

   (97  388   75   
  

Remeasurements after tax

   (73  73   156   
  

Stranded cost recoveries after tax

          9   
  

 

  

Total exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries after tax

   (170  461   240   
  

 

 

 

1.    No exceptional restructuring costs have been incurred in the year ended 31 March 2015. Restructuring costs for 2014 included: costs related to the continued restructuring of our UK operations in preparedness to deliver RIIO, other transformation-related initiatives in the UK and US and an associated software impairment for licences that will no longer be used. For the year ended 31 March 2013, restructuring costs included: costs for the restructuring of our UK operations of £66m in preparedness for delivering RIIO; costs for transformation-related initiatives in the UK and US of £31m; and a credit of £10m for the release of restructuring provisions in the UK recognised in prior years.

2.    No further provision (2014: £79m) has been made for the demolition of non-operational gas holders in the UK.

3.    For the year ended 31 March 2014, a net gain of £254m was recognised. This included a pension curtailment and settlement (£214m) for employees who transferred to a new employer following the cessation of the Management Services Agreement (MSA) with the Long Island Power Authority (LIPA) on 31 December 2013. There was also a gain of £142m following the extinguishment of debt obligations of £98m and a £56m cash payment received, in compensation for the Company forgiving an historical pension receivable and carrying charges. These gains were offset by transition costs and other provisions incurred to effect the transition.

4.    During the year ended 31 March 2014, £16m was received following the sale to a third party of a settlement award which arose as a result of a legal ruling in 2008.

5.    For the year ended 31 March 2013, we recognised a gain of £3m on the disposal of two subsidiaries in New Hampshire.

6.    Remeasurements – commodity contracts represent mark-to-market movements on certain physical and financial commodity contract obligations in the US. These contracts primarily relate to the forward purchase of energy for supply to customers, or to the economic hedging thereof, that are required to be measured at fair value and that do not qualify for hedge accounting. Under the existing rate plans in the US, commodity costs are recoverable from customers although the timing of recovery may differ from the pattern of costs incurred.

7.    For the year ended 31 March 2013, stranded cost recoveries of £14m substantially represented the release of an unutilised provision recognised in a prior period.

8.    Represents costs arising from a liability management programme. We have reviewed and restructured the Group debt portfolio following the commencement of the RIIO price controls in 2013 and the slow down in our planned short term UK capital investment programme as the industry assesses the impact of EMR. This resulted in a bond repurchase programme with a notional value of £924m.

9.    Remeasurements – net (losses)/gains on derivative financial instruments comprise (losses)/gains arising on derivative financial instruments reported in the income statement. These exclude gains and losses for which hedge accounting has been effective, which have been recognised directly in other comprehensive income or which are offset by adjustments to the carrying value of debt. The tax charge in the year includes a credit of £1m (2014: £nil; 2013: £1m) in respect of prior years.

10.  The Finance Act 2013 enacted reductions in the UK corporation tax rate from 23% to 21% from 1 April 2014, and from 21% to 20% from 1 April 2015. Other UK tax legislation also reduced the UK corporation tax rate in prior periods (2013: from 24% to 23%). These reductions have resulted in decreases to UK deferred tax liabilities in these periods.

11.  The exceptional tax charge in the prior year arose from a net increase in US state income tax rates. Effective from 1 April 2014, the state income tax rate for Massachusetts regulated utilities increased from 6.5% to 8% and, effective from 1 April 2016, the state income tax rate for New York will decrease from 7.1% to 6.5%.

 
 
1. Interest on funding attributable to assets in the course of construction in the current year was capitalised at a rate of 3.3% (2015: 3.8%; 2014: 4.5%). In the UK, capitalised interest qualifies for a  current year tax deduction with tax relief claimed of £19m (2015: £24m; 2014: £32m). In the US, capitalised interest is added to the cost of plant and qualifies for tax depreciation allowances.
2. Includes a net foreign exchange loss on financing activities of £407m (2015: £636m gain; 2014: £268m gain) offset by foreign exchange gains and losses on derivative financial instruments measured  at fair value.
3. Includes a net gain on instruments designated as fair value hedges of £34m (2015: £219m gain; 2014: £183m loss) and a net gain of £5m (2015: £162m loss; 2014: £205m gain) arising from fair value  adjustments to the carrying value of debt.

 

     104112National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements 


   Financial Statements

 

    

    

    

    

 

  

5. Finance income and costs

 

  

 

 

This note details the interest income generated by our financial assets and interest expense incurred on our financial liabilities. It also includes the expected return on our pensions and other post-retirement assets, which is offset by the interest payable on pensions and other post-retirement obligations and presented on a net basis. In reporting business performance, we adjust net financing costs to exclude any net gains or losses on derivative financial instruments included in remeasurements. In addition, the current year debt redemption costs have been treated as exceptional (see note 4).

 

      

     
    

2015

£m

  

2014

£m

  

2013 

£m 

 
 

 

 
 

Finance income

    
 

Interest income on financial instruments:

    
 

Bank deposits and other financial assets

   28    22    20   
 

Gains on disposal of available-for-sale investments

   8    14    10   
 

 

 
    36    36    30   
 

 

 
 

Finance costs

    
 

Net interest on pensions and other post-retirement benefit obligations

   (101  (128  (135)  
 

Interest expense on financial liabilities held at amortised cost:

    
 

Bank loans and overdrafts

   (45  (61  (65)  
 

Other borrowings

   (992  (1,109  (1,052)  
 

Derivatives

   56    79    51   
 

Unwinding of discount on provisions

   (73  (73  (75)  
 

Less: interest capitalised1

   86    148    122   
 

 

 
    (1,069  (1,144  (1,154)  
 

 

 
 

Exceptional items

    
 

Debt redemption costs

   (131      –   
 

Remeasurements

    
 

Net gains/(losses) on derivative financial instruments included in remeasurements2:

    
 

Ineffectiveness on derivatives designated as:

    
 

Fair value hedges3

   36    22    17   
 

Cash flow hedges

   (13  4    (7)  
 

Net investment hedges

   2    38    (26)  
 

Net investment hedges – undesignated forward rate risk

   33    (7  26   
 

Derivatives not designated as hedges or ineligible for hedge accounting

   (92  36    58   
 

 

 
    (165  93    68   
 

 

 
    (1,234  (1,051  (1,086)  
 

 

 
 
  

Net finance costs

   (1,198  (1,015  (1,056)  
  

 

 
 

 

1. Interest on funding attributable to assets in the course of construction in the current year was capitalised at a rate of 3.8% (2014: 4.5%; 2013: 4.4%). In the UK, capitalised interest qualifies for a current year tax deduction with tax relief claimed of £24m (2014: £32m). In the US, capitalised interest is added to the cost of plant and qualifies for tax depreciation allowances.

2. Includes a net foreign exchange gain on financing activities of £636m (2014: £268m gain; 2013: £32m loss) offset by foreign exchange gains and losses on derivative financial instruments measured at fair value.

3. Includes a net gain on instruments designated as fair value hedges of £219m (2014: £183m loss; 2013: £67m gain) offset by a net loss of £162m (2014: £205m gain; 2013: £50m loss) arising from fair value adjustments to the carrying value of debt.

     

     

     

 
 

LOGO

6. Tax

 

        NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15105                                 


     Financial Statements

   Notes to the consolidated financial statements

   – analysis of items in the primary statementscontinued

6. Tax

 

Tax is payable in the territories where we operate, mainly the UK and the US. This note gives further details of the total tax charge and tax liabilities, including current and deferred tax. The current tax charge is the tax payable on this year’s taxable profits. Deferred tax is an accounting adjustment to provide for tax that is expected to arise in the future due to differences in the accounting and tax bases of profit.

 

The tax charge for the period is recognised in the income statement, the statement of comprehensive income or directly in equity, according to the accounting treatment of the related transaction. The tax charge comprises both current and deferred tax.

Current tax assets and liabilities are measured at the amounts expected to be recovered from or paid to the tax authorities. The tax rates and tax laws used to compute the amounts are those that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the reporting date.

The calculation of the Group’s total tax charge involves a degree of estimation and judgement, and management periodically evaluates positions taken in tax returns with respect to situations in which applicable tax regulation is subject to interpretation and establishes provisions where appropriate on the basis of amounts expected to be paid to the tax authorities.

Deferred tax is provided for using the balance sheet liability method and is recognised on temporary differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities in the financial statements and the corresponding tax bases used in the computation of taxable profit.

Deferred tax liabilities are generally recognised on all taxable temporary differences and deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is probable that taxable profits will be available against which deductible temporary differences can be utilised. However, deferred tax assets and liabilities are not recognised if the temporary differences arise from the initial recognition of goodwill or from the initial recognition of other assets and liabilities in a transaction (other than a business combination) that affects neither the accounting nor the taxable profit or loss.

Deferred tax liabilities are recognised on taxable temporary differences arising on investments in subsidiaries and jointly controlled entities except where the Company is able to control the reversal of the temporary difference and it is probable that the temporary difference will not reverse in the foreseeable future.

Deferred tax is calculated at the tax rates that are expected to apply in the period when the liability is settled or the asset is realised, based on the tax rates and tax laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the reporting date.

The carrying amount of deferred tax assets is reviewed at each reporting date and reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profits will be available to allow all or part of the deferred tax asset to be recovered. Unrecognised deferred tax assets are reassessed at each reporting date and are recognised to the extent that it has become probable that future taxable profits will allow the deferred tax asset to be recovered.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when there is a legally enforceable right to set off current tax assets against current tax liabilities and when they relate to income taxes levied by the same tax authority and the Company and its subsidiaries intend to settle their current tax assets and liabilities on a net basis.

 

The tax charge for the period is recognised in the income statement, the statement of comprehensive income or directly in equity, according to the accounting treatment of the related transaction. The tax charge comprises both current and deferred tax.

Current tax assets and liabilities are measured at the amounts expected to be recovered from or paid to the tax authorities. The tax rates and tax laws used to compute the amounts are those that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the reporting date.

The calculation of the Group’s total tax charge involves a degree of estimation and judgement, and management periodically evaluates positions taken in tax returns with respect to situations in which applicable tax regulation is subject to interpretation and establishes provisions where appropriate on the basis of amounts expected to be paid to the tax authorities.

Deferred tax is provided for using the balance sheet liability method and is recognised on temporary differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities in the financial statements and the corresponding tax bases used in the computation of taxable profit.

Deferred tax liabilities are generally recognised on all taxable temporary differences and deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is probable that taxable profits will be available against which deductible temporary differences can be utilised. However, deferred tax assets and liabilities are not recognised if the temporary differences arise from the initial recognition of goodwill or from the initial recognition of other assets and liabilities in a transaction (other than a business combination) that affects neither the accounting nor the taxable profit or loss.

Deferred tax liabilities are recognised on taxable temporary differences arising on investments in subsidiaries and jointly controlled entities except where the Company is able to control the reversal of the temporary difference and it is probable that the temporary difference will not reverse in the foreseeable future.

Deferred tax is calculated at the tax rates that are expected to apply in the period when the liability is settled or the asset is realised, based on the tax rates and tax laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the reporting date.

The carrying amount of deferred tax assets is reviewed at each reporting date and reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profits will be available to allow all or part of the deferred tax asset to be recovered. Unrecognised deferred tax assets are reassessed at each reporting date and are recognised to the extent that it has become probable that future taxable profits will allow the deferred tax asset to be recovered.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when there is a legally enforceable right to set off current tax assets against current tax liabilities and when they relate to income taxes levied by the same tax authority and the Company and its subsidiaries intend to settle their current tax assets and liabilities on a net basis.

Tax charged/(credited) to the income statement

     2016     2015     2014 
      £m     £m     £m 

Tax before exceptional items and remeasurements

     753       695       581  

Exceptional tax on items not included in profit before tax (note 4)

     (296     (6     (390

Tax on other exceptional items and remeasurements

     (19     (72     93  

Tax on total exceptional items and remeasurements (note 4)

     (315     (78     (297

Total tax charge

     438       617       284  

 

Tax as a percentage of profit before tax

 

            
     2016     2015     2014 
      %     %     % 

Before exceptional items and remeasurements

     24.0       24.2       22.5  

After exceptional items and remeasurements

     14.4       23.5       10.3  

 

     106National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements113


Notes to the consolidated financial statements

– analysis of items in the primary statements continued

6. Taxcontinued

The tax charge for the year can be analysed as follows:

     2016     2015     2014 
      £m     £m     £m 

Current tax

            

UK corporation tax at 20% (2015: 21%; 2014: 23%)

     322       309       355  

UK corporation tax adjustment in respect of prior years

     (7     (2     (9
      315       307       346  

Overseas corporation tax

     38       51       54  

Overseas corporation tax adjustment in respect of prior years

     (19     (62     (88
      19       (11     (34

Total current tax

     334       296       312  

Deferred tax

            

UK deferred tax

     (152     123       (292

UK deferred tax adjustment in respect of prior years

     26       7       (3
      (126     130       (295

Overseas deferred tax

     229       138       276  

Overseas deferred tax adjustment in respect of prior years

     1       53       (9
      230       191       267  

Total deferred tax

     104       321       (28
                      

Total tax charge

     438       617       284  

 

Tax (credited)/charged to other comprehensive income and equity

 

  

     2016     2015     2014 
      £m     £m     £m 

Current tax

            

Share-based payment

     (2     (7     (3

Available-for-sale investments

     5       5       (5

Deferred tax

            

Available-for-sale investments

     12       2       2  

Cash flow hedges

     15       (18     5  

Share-based payment

            3       (4

Remeasurements of net retirement benefit obligations

     125       (299     172  
      155       (314     167  

Total tax recognised in the statement of comprehensive income

     157       (310     174  

Total tax relating to share-based payment recognised directly in equity

     (2     (4     (7
      155       (314     167  

114National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements 


   Financial Statements

 

    

    

    

    

 

  

6. Taxcontinued

 

Tax charged/(credited) to the income statement

 

    
      2015
£m
  2014
£m
  2013    
£m    
 
  

 

 
  

Tax before exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries

   695    581    619     
  

 

 
  

Exceptional tax on items not included in profit before tax (note 4)

   (6  (390  (128)    
  

Tax on other exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries

   (72  93    66     
  

 

 
  

Tax on total exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries (note 4)

   (78  (297  (62)    
  

 

 
  

Total tax charge

   617    284    557     
  

 

 
 

 

Tax as a percentage of profit before tax

 

   2015
%
 2014
%
 2013   
%   
 
  

 

 
  

Before exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries

   24.2    22.5    24.4     
  

 

 
  

After exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries

   23.5    10.3    20.5     
  

 

 
 

 

The tax charge for the year can be analysed as follows:

 

   2015
£m
 2014
£m
 2013    
£m    
 
  

 

 
  

Current tax

    
  

UK corporation tax at 21% (2014: 23%; 2013: 24%)

   309    355    306     
  

UK corporation tax adjustment in respect of prior years

   (2  (9  (17) ��  
  

 

 
     307    346    289     
  

 

 
  

Overseas corporation tax

   51    54    50     
  

Overseas corporation tax adjustment in respect of prior years

   (62  (88  (222)    
  

 

 
     (11  (34  (172)    
  

 

 
  

Total current tax

   296    312    117     
  

 

 
  

Deferred tax

    
  

UK deferred tax

   123    (292  35     
  

UK deferred tax adjustment in respect of prior years

   7    (3  (17)    
  

 

 
     130    (295  18     
  

 

 
  

Overseas deferred tax

   138    276    283     
  

Overseas deferred tax adjustment in respect of prior years

   53    (9  139     
  

 

 
     191    267    422     
  

 

 
  

Total deferred tax

   321    (28  440     
  

 

 
 
  

 

 
  

Total tax charge

   617    284    557     
  

 

 
 

 

Adjustments in respect of prior years include the following amounts that relate to exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries: £1m credit (2014: £nil; 2013: £1m credit).

 

 

 

 

 

   

6. Taxcontinued

 

LOGO

The tax charge for the year after exceptional items and remeasurements is lower (2015: higher; 2014: lower) than the standard rate of corporation tax in the UK of 20% (2015: 21%; 2014: 23%):

  Before  After  Before  After  Before  After 
  exceptional  exceptional  exceptional  exceptional  exceptional  exceptional 
  items and  items and  items and  items and  items and  items and 
  remeasurements  remeasurements  remeasurements  remeasurements  remeasurements  remeasurements 
  2016  2016  2015  2015  2014  2014 
   £m  £m  £m  £m  £m  £m 

Profit before tax

      

Before exceptional items and remeasurements

  3,142    3,142    2,876    2,876    2,584    2,584  

Exceptional items and remeasurements

      (110      (248      164  

Profit before tax

  3,142    3,032    2,876    2,628    2,584    2,748  

Profit before tax multiplied by UK corporation tax rate of 20% (2015: 21%; 2014: 23%)

  628    606    604    552    594    632  

Effect of:

      

Adjustments in respect of prior years

  2    1    (3  (4  (109  (109

Expenses not deductible for tax purposes

  29    118    31    327    32    284  

Non-taxable income

  (26  (113  (20  (320  (24  (268

Adjustment in respect of foreign tax rates

  124    129    91    77    98    138  

Impact of share-based payment

  (1  (1  (1  (1  (3  (3

Deferred tax impact of change in UK and US tax rates

      (296      (6      (390

Other

  (3  (6  (7  (8  (7    

Total tax charge

  753    438    695    617    581    284  
      
   %    %    %    %    %    %  

Effective tax rate

  24.0    14.4    24.2    23.5    22.5    10.3  

Factors that may affect future tax charges

The Finance Act 2015 (No.2) (the Act) was enacted on 18 November 2015. The Act reduced the main rate of UK corporation tax to 19% with effect from 1 April 2017 and 18% from 1 April 2020 and deferred tax balances have been calculated at 18%.

The Budget in March this year announced a further reduction in the corporate tax rate to 17% from 1 April 2020, from the previously enacted 18%. This has not been substantively enacted at the reporting date. As the change to 17% had not been substantively enacted at the reporting date its effects are not included in these financial statements. The overall effect of that change, if it had applied to the deferred tax balances at the reporting date, would be to reduce the deferred tax liability by an additional £139m and reduce the tax expense for the period by £139m.

There continued to be significant international focus on tax reform during 2015/16, including the OECD’s Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) project to address mismatches in international rules and European Commission initiatives. We will continue to monitor developments and assess the potential impact for National Grid of these and any further initiatives.

 

        NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15 107                                 National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements115


     Financial Statements

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

– analysis of items in the primary statementscontinued

  

6. Taxcontinued

 

Tax (credited)/charged to other comprehensive income and equity

  

  

      

2015

£m

  

2014

£m

  

2013   

£m   

 
  

 

 
  

Current tax

  

   
  

Share-based payment

  

  (7  (3  1     
  

Available-for-sale investments

  

  5    (5  –     
  

Deferred tax

  

   
  

Available-for-sale investments

  

  2    2    2     
  

Cash flow hedges

  

  (18  5    13     
  

Share-based payment

  

  3    (4  1     
  

Remeasurements of net retirement benefit obligations

  

  (299  172    (179)    
  

 

 
    (314  167    (162)    
  

 

 
  

Total tax recognised in the statement of comprehensive income

  

  (310  174    (164)    
  

Total tax relating to share-based payment recognised directly in equity

  

  (4  (7  2     
  

 

 
    (314  167    (162)    
  

 

 
 

 

The tax charge for the year after exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries is higher (2014: lower; 2013: lower) than the standard rate of corporation tax in the UK of 21% (2014: 23%; 2013: 24%):

 

   

   

Before

exceptional

items,

remeasurements

and stranded

cost recoveries

2015

£m

 

After

exceptional

items,

remeasurements

and stranded

cost recoveries

2015

£m

 

Before

exceptional

items,

remeasurements

and stranded

cost recoveries

2014

£m

 

After

exceptional

items,

remeasurements

and stranded

cost recoveries

2014

£m

 

Before
exceptional
items,
remeasurements
and stranded
cost recoveries
2013

£m

 

After   

exceptional   
items,   
remeasurements   
and stranded   
cost recoveries   

2013    

£m   

 
  

 

 
  

Profit before tax

      
  

Before exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries

  2,876    2,876    2,584    2,584    2,533    2,533     
  

Exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries

      (248      164        178     
  

 

 
  

Profit before tax

  2,876    2,628    2,584    2,748    2,533    2,711     
  

 

 
  

Profit before tax multiplied by UK corporation tax rate of 21% (2014: 23%; 2013: 24%)

  604    552    594    632    608    651     
  

Effect of:

      
  

Adjustments in respect of prior years

  (3  (4  (109  (109  (116  (117)    
  

Expenses not deductible for tax purposes

  31    327    32    284    37    169     
  

Non-taxable income

  (20  (320  (24  (268  (24  (152)    
  

Adjustment in respect of foreign tax rates

  91    77    98    138    116    140     
  

Impact of share-based payment

  (1  (1  (3  (3  2    2     
  

Deferred tax impact of change in UK and US tax rates

      (6      (390      (128)    
  

Other

  (7  (8  (7      (4  (8)    
  

 

 
  

Total tax charge

  695    617    581    284    619    557     
  

 

 
        
     %  %  %  %  %  %     
  

 

 
  

Effective tax rate

  24.2    23.5    22.5    10.3    24.4    20.5     
  

 

 
 

        108


    

    

 

6. Taxcontinued

 

Tax included within the statement of financial position

The following are the major deferred tax assets and liabilities recognised, and the movements thereon, during the current and prior reporting periods:

 

  

6. Taxcontinued

 

Tax included within the statement of financial position

The following are the major deferred tax assets and liabilities recognised, and the movements thereon, during the current and prior reporting periods:

 

      

Accelerated

tax

depreciation

£m

  

Share-

based

payment

£m

  Pensions
and other
post-
retirement
benefits
£m
  Financial
instruments
£m
  Other net
temporary
differences
£m
  

Total    

£m   

  

 

  

Deferred tax (assets)/liabilities

       
  

Deferred tax assets at 31 March 2013

   (2  (15  (1,362  (16  (777 (2,172)  
  

Deferred tax liabilities at 31 March 2013

   5,963        154    9    123   6,249   
  

 

  

At 1 April 2013

   5,961    (15  (1,208  (7  (654 4,077   
  

Exchange adjustments

   (282      78        59   (145)  
  

(Credited)/charged to income statement

   (30  (3  141    (7  (126 (25)  
  

(Credited)/charged to other comprehensive income and equity

       (4  172    7       175   
  

 

  

At 31 March 2014

   5,649    (22  (817  (7  (721 4,082   
  

 

  

Deferred tax assets at 31 March 2014

   (1  (22  (960  (13  (796 (1,792)  
  

Deferred tax liabilities at 31 March 2014

   5,650        143    6    75   5,874   
  

 

  

At 1 April 2014

   5,649    (22  (817  (7  (721 4,082   
  

Exchange adjustments

   408        (99  (2  (104 203   
  

Charged/(credited) to income statement

   599    1    38    (34  (280 324   
  

Charged/(credited) to other comprehensive income and equity

       3    (299  (16     (312)  
  

 

  

At 31 March 2015

   6,656    (18  (1,177  (59  (1,105 4,297   
  

 

  

Deferred tax assets at 31 March 2015

   (1  (18  (1,337  (64  (1,186 (2,606)  
  

Deferred tax liabilities at 31 March 2015

   6,657        160    5    81   6,903   
  

 

     6,656    (18  (1,177  (59  (1,105 4,297   
  

 

 

 

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are only offset where there is a legally enforceable right of offset and there is an intention to settle the balances net. The deferred tax balances (after offset) for statement of financial position purposes consist solely of deferred tax liabilities of £4,297m (2014: £4,082m).

 

Deferred tax assets in respect of capital losses, trading losses and non-trade deficits have not been recognised as their future recovery is uncertain or not currently anticipated. The deferred tax assets not recognised are as follows:

 

                  2015 £m  2014   
£m   
  

 

  

Capital losses

       250   274   
  

Non-trade deficits

       1   1   
  

Trading losses

       4   5   
  

 

 

 

The capital losses and non-trade deficits that arise in the UK are available to carry forward indefinitely. However, the capital losses can only be offset against specific types of future capital gains and non-trade deficits against specific future non-trade profits. The trading losses arising in the US have up to a 20 year carry forward time limit.

 

The aggregate amount of temporary differences associated with the unremitted earnings of overseas subsidiaries and joint ventures for which deferred tax liabilities have not been recognised at the reporting date is approximately £773m (2014: £2,118m). No liability is recognised in respect of the differences because the Company and its subsidiaries are in a position to control the timing of the reversal of the temporary differences and it is probable that such differences will not reverse in the foreseeable future. In addition, as a result of UK tax legislation, which largely exempts overseas dividends received, the temporary differences are unlikely to lead to additional tax.

 
 
         Pensions          
         and other          
   Accelerated  Share-  post-     Other net    
   tax  based  retirement  Financial  temporary    
   depreciation  payment  benefits  instruments  differences  Total 
    £m  £m  £m  £m  £m  £m 

Deferred tax (assets)/liabilities

       

Deferred tax assets at 31 March 2014

   (1  (22  (960  (13  (796  (1,792

Deferred tax liabilities at 31 March 2014

   5,650        143    6    75    5,874  

At 1 April 2014

   5,649    (22  (817  (7  (721  4,082  

Exchange adjustments

   408        (99  (2  (104  203  

Charged/(credited) to income statement

   599    1    38    (34  (280  324  

Charged/(credited) to other comprehensive income and equity

       3    (299  (16      (312

At 31 March 2015

   6,656    (18  (1,177  (59  (1,105  4,297  

Deferred tax assets at 31 March 2015

   (1  (18  (1,337  (64  (1,186  (2,606

Deferred tax liabilities at 31 March 2015

   6,657        160    5    81    6,903  

At 1 April 2015

   6,656    (18  (1,177  (59  (1,105  4,297  

Exchange adjustments and other

   141    1    (33  (1  (30  78  

Charged/(credited) to income statement

   266    3    47    (6  (203  107  

Charged to other comprehensive income and equity

           125    13    14    152  

At 31 March 2016

   7,063    (14  (1,038  (53  (1,324  4,634  

Deferred tax assets at 31 March 2016

   (1  (14  (1,201  (66  (1,408  (2,690

Deferred tax liabilities at 31 March 2016

   7,064        163    13    84    7,324  
    7,063    (14  (1,038  (53  (1,324  4,634  

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are only offset where there is a legally enforceable right of offset and there is an intention to settle the balances net. The deferred tax balances (after offset) for statement of financial position purposes consist solely of deferred tax liabilities of £4,634m (2015: £4,297m). Deferred tax of £667m (2015: £461m) has been recognised in respect of net operating losses.

Deferred tax assets in respect of capital losses, trading losses and non-trade deficits have not been recognised as their future recovery is uncertain or not currently anticipated. The deferred tax assets not recognised are as follows:

 

LOGO
     2016     2015 
      £m     £m 

Capital losses

     232       250  

Non-trade deficits

     5       1  

Trading losses

            4  

The capital losses and non-trade deficits that arise in the UK are available to carry forward indefinitely. However, the capital losses can only be offset against specific types of future capital gains and non-trade deficits against specific future non-trade profits. The trading losses arising in the US have up to a 20 year carry forward time limit.

The aggregate amount of temporary differences associated with the unremitted earnings of overseas subsidiaries and joint ventures for which deferred tax liabilities have not been recognised at the reporting date is approximately £502m (2015: £773m). No liability is recognised in respect of the differences because the Company and its subsidiaries are in a position to control the timing of the reversal of the temporary differences and it is probable that such differences will not reverse in the foreseeable future. In addition, as a result of UK tax legislation, which largely exempts overseas dividends received, the temporary differences are unlikely to lead to additional tax.

 

            NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15116 109                                 National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements


 

Financial Statements

 

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

    

– analysis of items in the primary statementscontinued

 

Unaudited commentary on tax

Tax strategy

National Grid manages its tax affairs in a proactive and responsible way in order to comply with all relevant legislation and minimise reputational risk. As a regulated public utility we are very conscious of the need to manage our tax affairs responsibly in the eyes of our stakeholders. We have a good working relationship with all relevant tax authorities and actively engage with them in order to ensure that they are fully aware of our view of the tax implications of our business initiatives. Management responsibility and oversight for our tax strategy, which is approved by the Finance Committee, rests with the Finance Director and the GlobalGroup Tax and Treasury Director who monitor our tax activities and report to the Finance Committee.

Total UK tax contribution

This is the third year we have again disclosed additional information in respect of our total UK tax contribution for consistency and to aid transparency in an area in which there remains significant public interest. As was the case in prior years, the total amount of taxes we pay and collect in the UK year on year is significantly more than just the corporation tax which we pay on our UK profits. Within the total, we again include other taxes paid such as business rates and taxes on employment together with employee taxes and other indirect taxes.

For 2014/152015/16 our total tax contribution to the UK Exchequer was £1.5bn (2013/14: £1.4bn)£1.6bn (2014/15: £1.5bn). Taxes borne in 20152015/16 were £761m, a 4% increase£703m, an 8% decrease on taxes borne in 20142014/15 of £733m£761m and primarily due to higherlower corporation tax payments in the current year. The main reasons for this are the impact of the reduction in the UK corporation tax rate, and the impact of our debt redemption costs during the year ended 31 March 2015, which reduced corporation tax payments due for that year but were settled by instalment payments made in the year ended 31 March 2016. However, our taxes collected were £899m, an increase of 21% on 2014/15 of £742m, and this was primarily due to the introduction of the VAT Domestic Reverse Charge on gas and electricity trading (introduced in July 2014) being in force for the full year, rather than for six months in 2014/15.

Our 2013/142014/15 total tax contribution of £1.4bn£1.5bn resulted in National Grid being the 13th highest contributor of UK taxes based on the results of the Hundred Group’s 20142015 Total Tax Contribution Survey, a position commensurate with the size of our business and capitalisation relative to other contributors to the Survey. In 20132014 we were also in 17th13th position. In 20142015 we ranked 9th7th in respect of taxes borne.

National Grid’s contribution to the UK economy is again broader than just the taxes it pays over to and collects on behalf of HMRC. The Hundred Group’s 20142015 Total Tax Contribution Survey ranks National Grid in 4th5th place in respect of UK capital expenditure on fixed assets. For instance, National Grid’s economic contribution also supports a significant number of UK jobs in our supply chain.

The most significant amounts making up the 2014/152015/16 total tax contribution were as follows:

UK total tax contribution 2014/15

LOGO

Tax transparency

The UK tax charge for the year disclosed in the financial statements in accordance with accounting standards and the UK corporation tax paid during the year will differ. For transparency we have included a reconciliation below of the tax charge per the income statement to the UK corporation tax paid in 2014/15.2015/16.

The tax charge for the Group as reported in the income statement is £617m (2013/14: £284m)£438m (2014/15: £617m). The UK tax charge is £437m (2013/14: £51m)£189m (2014/15: £437m) and UK corporation tax paid was £353m (2013/14: £329m)£285m (2014/15: £353m), with the principal differences between these two measures as follows:

 

  Year ended 31 March    Year ended 31 March   

Reconciliation of UK total tax charge

to UK corporation tax paid

  2015
£m
 2014   
£m   
 

 

Total UK tax charge (current tax £307m (2014: £346m) and deferred tax £130m (2014: £295m credit))

   437   51     

Adjustment for non-cash deferred tax (charge)/credit

   (130 295     
Reconciliation of UK total tax charge 2016  2015 
to UK corporation tax paid £m  £m 

Total UK tax charge (current tax £315m (2015: £307m) and deferred tax credit £126m (2015: charge £130m))

  189   437  

Adjustment for non-cash deferred tax credit/(charge)

  126   (130

Adjustments for current tax credit in respect of prior years

   2   9       7   2  

 

UK current tax charge

   309   355       322   309  

UK corporation tax instalment payments not payable until the following year

   (127 (179)      (164 (127

UK corporation tax instalment payments in respect of prior years paid in current year

   171   153       127   171  

 

UK corporation tax paid

   353   329       285   353  

 

Tax losses

We have total unrecognised deferred tax assets in respect of losses of £255m (2013/14: £280m)£237m (2014/15: £255m) of which £250m (2013/14: £274m)£232m (2014/15: £250m) are capital losses in the UK as set out above. These losses arose as a result of the disposal of certain businesses or assets and may be available to offset against future capital gains in the UK.

Development of future tax policy

We believe that the continued development of a coherent and transparent tax policy in the UK is critical to help drive growth in the economy.

We continue to contribute to research into the structure of business tax and its economic impact by contributing to the funding of the Oxford University Centre for Business Tax at the Saïd Business School.

We are a member of a number of industry groups which participate in the development of future tax policy, including the Hundred Group, which represents the views of Finance Directors of FTSE 100 companies and several other large UK companies. Our Group Finance Director is Chairman of its Tax Committee. This helps to ensure that we are engaged at the earliest opportunity on tax issues which affect our business. In the current year we have reviewed and responded to a number of HMRC consultations, the subject matter of which directly impacts taxes borne or collected by our business.business, with the aim of openly contributing to the debate and development of UK tax legislation.

 

       110


 

UK total tax contribution 2015/16

LOGO


 National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements117


Notes to the consolidated financial statements

– analysis of items in the primary statements continued

7. Earnings per share (EPS)

 

EPS is the amount of post-tax profit attributable to each ordinary share. Basic EPS is calculated on profit for the year attributable to equity shareholders divided by the weighted average number of shares in issue during the year. Diluted EPS shows what the impact would be if all outstanding share options were exercised and treated as ordinary shares at year end. The weighted average number of shares is increased by additional shares issued as scrip dividends and reduced by shares repurchased by the Company during the year.

Adjusted earnings and EPS, which exclude exceptional items and remeasurements, are provided to reflect the business performance subtotals used by the Company. We have included reconciliations from this additional EPS measure to earnings for both basic and diluted EPS to provide additional detail for these items. For further details of exceptional items and remeasurements, see note 4.

(a) Basic earnings per share

 

  

7. Earnings per share (EPS)

 

  

  

 

EPS is the amount of post-tax profit attributable to each ordinary share. Basic EPS is calculated on profit for the year attributable to equity shareholders divided by the weighted average number of shares in issue during the year. Diluted EPS shows what the impact would be if all outstanding share options were exercised and treated as ordinary shares at year end. The weighted average number of shares is increased by additional shares issued as scrip dividends and reduced by shares repurchased by the Company during the year.

 

 

      

 
  

Adjusted earnings and EPS, which exclude exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries, are provided to reflect the business performance subtotals used by the Company. For further details of exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries, see note 4.

 

(a) Basic earnings per share

 

    

  

     

 

 

Earnings

2015

£m

  

  

  

  

 

 

 

Earnings

per share

2015

pence

  

  

  

  

  

 

 

Earnings

2014

£m

  

  

  

   

 

 

 

 

Earnings  

per share  

2014  

(restated)1

pence  

  

  

  

  

  

   

 

 

Earnings

2013

£m

  

  

  

   

 

 

 

 

Earnings  

per share  

2013  

(restated)1

pence  

  

  

  

  

  

  

 

 
  

Adjusted earnings

   2,189    58.1    2,015     53.5      1,913     50.9    
  

Exceptional items after tax

   (97  (2.6  388     10.3      75     2.0    
  

Remeasurements after tax

   (73  (1.9  73     1.9      156     4.1    
  

Stranded cost recoveries after tax

                –      9     0.2    
  

 

 
  

Earnings

         2,019    53.6    2,476     65.7      2,153     57.2    
  

 

 
            
      
 
2015
millions
  
  
    

 

2014 

millions 

  

  

     
 
2013  
millions  
  
  
  

 

 
  

Weighted average number of shares – basic1

    3,766      3,766        3,761    
  

 

 
 

 

1. Comparative amounts have been restated to reflect the impact of additional shares issued as scrip dividends.

 

(b) Diluted earnings per share

 

  

  

  

 

 

Earnings

2015

£m

  

  

  

 
 

 

 

Earnings
per share

2015

pence

  
  

  

  

 

 

 

Earnings

2014

£m

  

  

  

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings  

per share  

2014  

(restated)1

pence  

  

  

  

  

  

 

 

 

Earnings

2013

£m

  

  

  

 

 

 
 

 

Earnings  

per share  

2013  
(restated)1

pence  

  

  

  
  

  

  

 

 
  

Adjusted earnings

   2,189    57.9    2,015     53.2      1,913     50.6    
  

Exceptional items after tax

   (97  (2.6  388     10.3      75     2.0    
  

Remeasurements after tax

   (73  (1.9  73     1.9      156     4.1    
  

Stranded cost recoveries after tax

                –      9     0.3    
  

 

 
  

Earnings

   2,019    53.4    2,476     65.4      2,153     57.0    
  

 

 
            
         2015
millions
      2014  
millions  
       2013   
millions   
 
  

 

 
  

Weighted average number of shares – diluted1

    3,783      3,785        3,779    
  

 

 
 

 

1. Comparative amounts have been restated to reflect the impact of additional shares issued as scrip dividends.

  

 

 

 

(c) Reconciliation of basic to diluted average number of shares

 

  

  
 
2015
millions
  
  
 
 

 

2014  
(restated)1

millions  

  
  

  

 
 

 

2013  
(restated)1

millions  

  
  

  

  

 

 
  

Weighted average number of ordinary shares – basic

    3,766      3,766        3,761    
  

Effect of dilutive potential ordinary shares – employee share plans

    17      19        18    
  

 

 
  

Weighted average number of ordinary shares – diluted

    3,783      3,785        3,779    
  

 

 
 

 

1. Comparative amounts have been restated to reflect the impact of additional shares issued as scrip dividends.

  

 
 
            Earnings        Earnings  
      Earnings     per share        per share  
   Earnings  per share  Earnings  2015    Earnings   2014  
   2016  2016  2015  (restated)1   2014   (restated)1 
    £m  pence  £m  pence    £m   pence  

Adjusted earnings

   2,386    63.5    2,189    57.6      2,015     53.1   

Exceptional items after tax

   278    7.4    (97  (2.6)     388     10.2   

Remeasurements after tax

   (73  (1.9  (73  (1.8)     73     1.9   

Earnings

   2,591    69.0    2,019    53.2      2,476     65.2   
         
      2016     2015        2014  
        millions      millions         millions  

Weighted average number of shares – basic1

       3,755        3,798           3,798   

1.  Comparative amounts have been restated to reflect the impact of additional shares issued as scrip dividends.

(b) Diluted earnings per share

 

LOGO
            Earnings        Earnings  
      Earnings     per share        per share  
   Earnings  per share  Earnings  2015    Earnings   2014  
   2016  2016  2015  (restated)1   2014   (restated)1 
    £m  pence  £m  pence    £m   pence  

Adjusted earnings

   2,386    63.3    2,189    57.4      2,015     52.8   

Exceptional items after tax

   278    7.3    (97  (2.6)     388     10.2   

Remeasurements after tax

   (73  (1.9  (73  (1.9)     73     1.9   

Earnings

   2,591    68.7    2,019    52.9      2,476     64.9   
         
      2016     2015        2014  
        millions      millions         millions  

Weighted average number of shares – diluted1

       3,771        3,815           3,817   

 

1.  Comparative amounts have been restated to reflect the impact of additional shares issued as scrip dividends.

 

(c) Reconciliation of basic to diluted average number of shares

 

  

  

            2015        2014  
      2016     (restated)1       (restated)1 
        millions      millions         millions  

Weighted average number of ordinary shares – basic

    3,755     3,798        3,798   

Effect of dilutive potential ordinary shares – employee share plans

       16        17           19   

Weighted average number of ordinary shares – diluted

       3,771        3,815           3,817   

1.  Comparative amounts have been restated to reflect the impact of additional shares issued as scrip dividends.

 

        NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15118 111National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16
Financial Statements


 

Financial Statements

 

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

– analysis of items in the primary statements

8. Dividendscontinued

 

Dividends represent the return of profits to shareholders. Dividends are paid as an amount per ordinary share held. We retain part of the profits generated in the year to meet future growth plans and pay out the remainder in accordance with our dividend policy.

Interim dividends are recognised when they become payable to the Company’s shareholders. Final dividends are recognised when they are approved by shareholders.

 

  

8. Dividends

 

  

  

 

Dividends represent the return of profits to shareholders. Dividends are paid as an amount per ordinary share held. We retain part of the profits generated in the year to meet future growth plans and pay out the remainder in accordance with our dividend policy.

 

   

  

 

Interim dividends are recognised when they become payable to the Company’s shareholders. Final dividends are recognised when they are approved by shareholders.

 

   

     2015    2014  2013 
     Pence
per share
  

Cash
dividend
paid

£m

  Scrip  
dividend  
£m  
    Pence
per share
  

Cash
dividend
paid

£m

  Scrip  
dividend  
£m  
  Pence
per share
  

Cash
dividend
paid

£m

  Scrip  
dividend  
£m  
 
  

 

 
  

Interim dividend in respect of the current year

  14.71    531    26       14.49    539    –      14.49    340    187    
  Final dividend in respect of the prior year  27.54    740    289       26.36    520    444      25.35    470    436    
  

 

 
    42.25    1,271    315       40.85    1,059    444      39.84    810    623    
  

 

 
 

 

The Directors are proposing a final dividend for the year ended 31 March 2015 of 28.16p per share that will absorb approximately £1,054m of shareholders’ equity (assuming all amounts are settled in cash). It will be paid on 5 August 2015 to shareholders who are on the register of members at 5 June 2015 and a scrip dividend will be offered as an alternative, subject to shareholders’ approval at the Annual General Meeting.

     

   

2016

     

2015

     

2014

 
       Cash             Cash             Cash     
       dividend   Scrip         dividend   Scrip         dividend   Scrip 
   Pence   paid   dividend     Pence   paid   dividend     Pence   paid   dividend 
    per share   £m   £m      per share   £m   £m      per share   £m   £m 

Interim dividend in respect of the current year

   15.00     532     31      14.71     531     26      14.49     539       

Final dividend in respect of the prior year

   28.16     805     248       27.54     740     289       26.36     520     444  
    43.16     1,337     279       42.25     1,271     315       40.85     1,059     444  

The Directors are proposing a final dividend for the year ended 31 March 2016 of 28.34p per share that will absorb approximately £1,059m of shareholders’ equity (assuming all amounts are settled in cash). It will be paid on 10 August 2016 to shareholders who are on the register of members at 3 June 2016 (subject to Shareholders’ approval at the AGM). A scrip dividend will be offered as an alternative.

 

Unaudited commentary on dividends

 

Following the announcement of our dividend policy in March 2013, the Board remains confident that National Grid is able to support a dividend growing at least in line with RPI inflation for the foreseeable future, while continuing to invest as required in our regulated assets.

 

With the exception of the 2013/14 interim dividend paid in January 2014, a scrip option has been offered for all interim and final dividends in the last fourfive years. The scrip take-up as a percentage of total shares outstanding (excluding treasury shares) since 2012/13 was as follows: 2014/15 interim 5%; 2013/14 final 28%; 2013/14 interim n/a; 2012/13 final 46%; and 2012/13 interim 35%.

 

In August 2014 we began a share buyback programme that will allow us to offer the scrip dividend option for both the full-year and interim dividend. The buyback programme is designed to balance shareholders’ appetite for the scrip dividend option with our desire to operate an efficient balance sheet with appropriate leverage.

 

 

 

Dividend cover

Ratio of earnings cover over cash dividend paid to shareholdersand scrip dividend

 

  LOGOLOGO

       112


 

 National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements119


Notes to the consolidated financial statements

– analysis of items in the primary statements continued

9. Goodwill

 

Goodwill represents the excess of what we paid to acquire businesses over the fair value of their net assets at the acquisition date. We assess whether goodwill is recoverable each year by performing an impairment review.

Goodwill is recognised as an asset and is not amortised, but is tested for impairment annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate a potential impairment. Any impairment is recognised immediately in the income statement and is not subsequently reversed.

Goodwill and fair value adjustments arising on the acquisition of a foreign entity are treated as assets and liabilities of the foreign entity and translated at the closing exchange rate.

Impairment

Goodwill is allocated to cash-generating units and this allocation is made to those cash-generating units that are expected to benefit from the business combination in which the goodwill arose.

Impairments of goodwill are calculated as the difference between the carrying value of the goodwill and the estimated recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit to which that goodwill has been allocated. Recoverable amount is defined as the higher of fair value less costs to sell and estimated value-in-use at the date the impairment review is undertaken.

Value-in-use represents the present value of expected future cash flows, discounted using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset for which the estimates of future cash flows have not been adjusted.

Impairments are recognised in the income statement and are disclosed separately.

 

   Total 
£m 
 

Total  

£m  

 

 

Net book value at 1 April 20132014

5,028  
   4,594 

AdditionsImpairment

  12(12)  

Exchange adjustments

  (446)563   

 

Net book value at 31 March 2014

 4,594  

Impairment

(12) 

Exchange adjustments

563  

Net book value at 31 March 2015

   5,145 

Exchange adjustments

   170 

 

The cost of goodwillNet book value at 31 March 2015 was £5,157m (2014: £4,594m) with an accumulated impairment charge of £12m (2014: £nil).2016

    5,315 

 

The amounts disclosed above as at 31 March 2015 include balances relating to the following cash-generating units: New York £2,964m (2014: £2,640m); Massachusetts £1,108m (2014: £987m); Rhode Island £412m (2014: £367m); and Federal £661m (2014: £600m).

Goodwill is reviewed annually for impairment and the recoverability of goodwill has been assessed by comparing the carrying amount of our operations described above (our cash-generating units) with the expected recoverable amount on a value-in-use basis. In each assessment, the value-in-use has been calculated based on five year plan projections that incorporate our best estimates of future cash flows, customer rates, costs, future prices and growth. Such projections reflect our current regulatory rate plans taking into account regulatory arrangements to allow for future rate plan filings and recovery of investment. Our plans have proved to be reliable guides in the past and the Directors believe the estimates are appropriate.

The future economic growth rate used to extrapolate projections beyond five years has been maintained at 2.25% (2014: 2.25%). The growth rate has been determined having regard to data on projected growth in US real gross domestic product (GDP). Based on our business’ place in the underlying US economy, it is appropriate for the terminal growth rate to be based upon the overall growth in real GDP and, given the nature of our operations, to extend over a long period of time. Cash flow projections have been discounted to reflect the time value of money, using a pre-tax discount rate of 9% (2014:

The cost of goodwill at 31 March 2016 was £5,327m (2015: £5,157m) with an accumulated impairment charge of £12m (2015: £12m).

The amounts disclosed above as at 31 March 2016 include balances relating to the following cash-generating units: New York £3,061m (2015: £2,964m); Massachusetts £1,145m (2015: £1,108m); Rhode Island £426m (2015: £412m); and Federal £683m (2015: £661m).

Goodwill is reviewed annually for impairment and the recoverability of goodwill has been assessed by comparing the carrying amount of our operations described above (our cash-generating units) with the expected recoverable amount on a value-in-use basis. In each assessment, the value-in-use has been calculated based on five year plan projections that incorporate our best estimates of future cash flows, customer rates, costs (including changes in commodity prices), future prices and growth. Such projections reflect our current regulatory rate plans taking into account regulatory arrangements to allow for future rate plan filings and recovery of investment. Our plans have proved to be reliable guides in the past and the Directors believe the estimates are appropriate.

The future economic growth rate used to extrapolate projections beyond five years has been lowered to 2% (2015: 2.25%). The growth rate has been determined having regard to data on projected growth in US real gross domestic product (GDP). Based on our business’ place in the underlying US economy, it is appropriate for the terminal growth rate to be based upon the overall growth in real GDP and, given the nature of our operations, to extend over a long period of time. Cash flow projections have been discounted to reflect the time value of money, using a pre-tax discount rate of 8% (2015: 9%). The discount rate represents the estimated weighted average cost of capital of these operations.

While it is possible that a key assumption in the calculation could change, the Directors believe that no reasonably foreseeable change would result in an impairment of goodwill, in view of the long-term nature of the key assumptions and the margin by which the estimated fair value exceeds the carrying amount.

As part of their review in 2014/15, the Directors specifically reviewed the carrying value of goodwill associated with Clean Line Energy Partners LLC. This review resulted in a full impairment being recorded of £12m.

 

LOGO

        NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15120 113                                 National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16


Financial Statements

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

– analysis of items in the primary statements continued

  

10. Other intangible assets

 

  

 

Other intangible assets include software and acquisition-related assets (such as brand names and customer relationships), which are written down (amortised) over the length of period we expect to receive a benefit from the asset.

 

  

 

Identifiable intangible assets are recorded at cost less accumulated amortisation and any provision for impairment. Other intangible assets are tested for impairment only if there is an indication that the carrying value of the assets may have been impaired. Impairments of assets are calculated as the difference between the carrying value of the asset and the recoverable amount, if lower. Where such an asset does not generate cash flows that are independent from other assets, the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit to which that asset belongs is estimated. Impairments are recognised in the income statement and are disclosed separately. Any assets which suffered impairment in a previous period are reviewed for possible reversal of the impairment at each reporting date.

 

Internally generated intangible assets, such as software, are recognised only if: an asset is created that can be identified; it is probable that the asset created will generate future economic benefits; and the development cost of the asset can be measured reliably. Where no internally generated intangible asset can be recognised, development expenditure is recorded as an expense in the period in which it is incurred.

 

On a business combination, as well as recording separable intangible assets possessed by the acquired entity at their fair value, identifiable intangible assets that arise from contractual or other legal rights are also included in the statement of financial position at their fair value. Acquisition-related intangible assets principally comprise customer relationships.

 

Other intangible assets are amortised on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful economic lives. Amortisation periods for categories of intangible assets are:

 

         Years  
  

 

  

Software

   3 to 10  
  

Acquisition-related intangibles

       10 to 25  
  

 

 
   Software 
£m 

    Acquisition-
  related  

£m 

Total   

£m  

  

 

  

Cost at 1 April 2013

 1,031  122  1,153  
  

Exchange adjustments

 (38) (7) (45) 
  

Additions

 179  –  179  
  

Disposals

 (16) (115) (131) 
  

Reclassifications1

 66  –  66  
  

 

  

Cost at 31 March 2014

 1,222  –  1,222  
  

Exchange adjustments

 59  –  59  
  

Additions

 207  –  207  
  

Reclassifications1

 16  –  16  
  

 

  

Cost at 31 March 2015

 1,504  –  1,504  
  

 

  

Accumulated amortisation at 1 April 2013

 (442) (122) (564) 
  

Exchange adjustments

 12   19  
  

Amortisation charge for the year

 (127) –  (127) 
  

Impairment charge

 (5) –  (5) 
  

Disposals

 12  115  127  
  

Reclassifications1

 (3) –  (3) 
  

 

  

Accumulated amortisation at 31 March 2014

 (553) –  (553) 
  

Exchange adjustments

 (20) –  (20) 
  

Amortisation charge for the year

 (121) –  (121) 
  

Reclassifications1

 (8) –  (8) 
  

 

  

Accumulated amortisation at 31 March 2015

 (702) –  (702) 
  

 

  

Net book value at 31 March 2015

 802  –  802  
  

 

  

Net book value at 31 March 2014

 669  –  669  
  

 

 

 

1. Reclassifications includes amounts transferred (to)/from property, plant and equipment (see note 11) and reclasses between cost and accumulated amortisation of £6m.

 
 
 

     114 


 

   Financial Statements

10. Other intangible assets

 

Other intangible assets include software which is written down (amortised) over the length of period we expect to receive a benefit from the asset.

Identifiable intangible assets are recorded at cost less accumulated amortisation and any provision for impairment. Other intangible assets are tested for impairment only if there is an indication that the carrying value of the assets may have been impaired. Impairments of assets are calculated as the difference between the carrying value of the asset and the recoverable amount, if lower. Where such an asset does not generate cash flows that are independent from other assets, the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit to which that asset belongs is estimated. Impairments are recognised in the income statement and are disclosed separately. Any assets which suffered impairment in a previous period are reviewed for possible reversal of the impairment at each reporting date.

Internally generated intangible assets, such as software, are recognised only if: an asset is created that can be identified; it is probable that the asset created will generate future economic benefits; and the development cost of the asset can be measured reliably. Where no internally generated intangible asset can be recognised, development expenditure is recorded as an expense in the period in which it is incurred.

Other intangible assets are amortised on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful economic lives. Amortisation periods for categories of intangible assets are:

Years 

Software3 to 10 

Software 
£m 

Cost at 1 April 2014

1,222 

Exchange adjustments

59 

Additions

207 

Reclassifications1

16 

Cost at 31 March 2015

1,504 

Exchange adjustments

22 

Additions

220 

Disposals

(3)

Reclassifications1

Cost at 31 March 2016

1,744 

Accumulated amortisation at 1 April 2014

(553)

Exchange adjustments

(20)

Amortisation charge for the year

(121)

Reclassifications1

(8)

Accumulated amortisation at 31 March 2015

(702)

Exchange adjustments

(8)

Amortisation charge for the year

(147)

Reclassifications1

– 

Accumulated amortisation at 31 March 2016

(857)

Net book value at 31 March 2016

887

Net book value at 31 March 2015

802 

1.  Reclassifications includes amounts transferred (to)/from property, plant and equipment (see note 11) and reclasses between cost and accumulated amortisation of £nil (2015: £6m).

 

 National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements121


Notes to the consolidated financial statements

– analysis of items in the primary statements continued

11. Property, plant and equipment

 

The following note shows the physical assets controlled by us. The cost of these assets primarily represents the amount initially paid for them. A depreciation expense is charged to the income statement to reflect annual wear and tear and the reduced value of the asset over time. Depreciation is calculated by estimating the number of years we expect the asset to be used (useful economic life) and charging the cost of the asset to the income statement equally over this period.

 

Our strategy in action

We operate an energy networks business and therefore have a significant physical asset base. We continue to invest in our networks to maintain reliability, create new customer connections and ensure our networks are flexible and resilient. Our business plan envisages these additional investments will be funded through a mixture of cash generated from operations and the issue of new debt.

Property, plant and equipment is recorded at cost, less accumulated depreciation and any impairment losses.

Cost includes the purchase price of the asset, any payroll and finance costs incurred which are directly attributable to the construction of property, plant and equipment as well as the cost of any associated asset retirement obligations.

Property, plant and equipment includes assets in which the Company’s interest comprises legally protected statutory or contractual rights of use. Additions represent the purchase or construction of new assets, including capital expenditure for safety and environmental assets, and extensions to, enhancements to, or replacement of existing assets.

Contributions received prior to 1 July 2009 towards the cost of property, plant and equipment are included in trade and other payables as deferred income and credited on a straight-line basis to the income statement over the estimated useful economic lives of the assets to which they relate.

Contributions received post 1 July 2009 are recognised in revenue immediately, except where the contributions are consideration for a future service, in which case they are recognised initially as deferred income and revenue is subsequently recognised over the period in which the service is provided.

No depreciation is provided on freehold land or assets in the course of construction.

Other items of property, plant and equipment are depreciated, on a straight-line basis, at rates estimated to write off their book values over their estimated useful economic lives. In assessing estimated useful economic lives, consideration is given to any contractual arrangements and operational requirements relating to particular assets. The assessments of estimated useful economic lives and residual values of assets are performed annually. Unless otherwise determined by operational requirements, the depreciation periods for the principal categories of property, plant and equipment are, in general, as shown in the table below:

 

   Years  

 

 

Freehold and leasehold buildings

   up to 65   

Plant and machinery:

  

Electricity transmission plant

   15 to 60   

Electricity distribution plant

   15 to 60   

Electricity generation plant

   20 to 40   

Interconnector plant

   15 to 60   

Gas plant – mains, services and regulating equipment

   30 to 100   

Gas plant – storage

   15 to 21   

Gas plant – meters

   10 to 33   

Motor vehicles and office equipment

   up to 10   

 

 

Gains and losses on disposals are determined by comparing the proceeds with the carrying amount and are recognised within operating profit in the income statement.

Items within property, plant and equipment are tested for impairment only if there is some indication that the carrying value of the assets may have been impaired.

Impairments of assets are calculated as the difference between the carrying value of the asset and the recoverable amount, if lower. Where such an asset does not generate cash flows that are independent from other assets, the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit to which that asset belongs is estimated.

Material impairments are recognised in the income statement and are disclosed separately.

Any assets which suffered impairment in a previous period are reviewed for possible reversal of the impairment at each reporting date.

 

LOGO

        NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15122 115                                 National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16


Financial Statements

   Notes to the consolidated financial statements

– analysis of items in the primary statements continued

  11. Property, plant and equipmentcontinued
         Assets   Motor    
         in the   vehicles    
         Land and  Plant and  course of   and office    
     buildings      machinery      construction       equipment   Total  
     £m  £m £m   £m   £m  
  

 

  Cost at 1 April 2013 2,325  45,366  3,960   803   52,454  
  Exchange adjustments (99) (1,471) (82)  (28)  (1,680) 
  Additions 69  623  2,514   56   3,262  
  Disposals (32) (288) (2)  (98)  (420) 
  Reclassifications1 (15) 2,195  (2,366)  120   (66) 
  

 

  Cost at 31 March 2014 2,248  46,425  4,024   853   53,550  
  Exchange adjustments 132  2,019  82   47   2,280  
  Additions 55  544  2,514   150   3,263  
  Disposals (30) (334) (1)  (74)  (439) 
  Reclassifications1 105  1,981  (2,104)    (10) 
  

 

  Cost at 31 March 2015 2,510  50,635  4,515   984   58,644  
  

 

  Accumulated depreciation at 1 April 2013 (499) (14,806) –   (557)  (15,862) 
  Exchange adjustments 16  399  –   21   436  
  Depreciation charge for the year2 (84) (1,112) –   (103)  (1,299) 
  Impairment charge for the year (1) –  –   –   (1) 
  Disposals 25  234  –   93   352  
  Reclassifications1 107  (65) –   (39)  3  
  

 

  Accumulated depreciation at 31 March 2014 (436) (15,350) –   (585)  (16,371) 
  Exchange adjustments (15) (533) –   (29)  (577) 
  Depreciation charge for the year2 (82) (1,138) –   (143)  (1,363) 
  Disposals  307  –   74   388 
  Reclassifications1 (4)  –     2  
  

 

  Accumulated depreciation at 31 March 2015 (530) (16,713) –   (678)  (17,921) 
  

 

  Net book value at 31 March 2015 1,980      33,922  4,515   306   40,723  
  

 

  Net book value at 31 March 2014 1,812  31,075  4,024   268   37,179  
  

 

 

 

1. Represents amounts transferred between categories and (to)/from other intangible assets (see note 10).

2. Includes amounts in respect of capitalised depreciation of £2m (2014: £10m).

 

      2015  2014  
      £m  £m  
  

 

  Information in relation to property, plant and equipment    
  Capitalised interest included within cost  1,506    1,409  
  Net book value of assets held under finance leases (all relating to motor vehicles and office equipment)  184    170  
  Additions to assets held under finance leases (all relating to motor vehicles and office equipment)  61    25  
  Contributions to cost of property, plant and equipment included within:    
  

Trade and other payables

  47    44  
  

Non-current liabilities

  1,569    1,526  
  

 

 
 

12. Other non-current assets

 

 

Other non-current assets include assets that do not fall into any other non-current asset category (such as goodwill or property, plant and equipment) and the benefit to be received from the asset is not due to be received until after 31 March 2016.

 
      2015  2014  
      £m  £m  
  

 

  Commodity contract assets  29    45  
  Other receivables  39    33  
  Prepayments  12    9  
  

 

    80    87  
  

 

 
 
 

       116 


  

13. Financial and other investments

 

  

  

 

Financial and other investments include two main categories. Assets classified as available-for-sale typically represent investments in short-term money funds and quoted investments in equities or bonds of other companies. The second category is loans and receivables which includes bank deposits with a maturity of greater than three months, and cash balances that cannot be readily used in operations, principally collateral pledged for certain borrowings.

 

     

  

 

Financial assets, liabilities and equity instruments are classified according to the substance of the contractual arrangements entered into, and recognised on trade date. Available-for-sale financial assets are non-derivatives that are either designated in this category or not classified in any other categories.

 

Available-for-sale financial investments are recognised at fair value plus directly related incremental transaction costs, and are subsequently carried at fair value in the statement of financial position. Changes in the fair value of available-for-sale investments are recognised directly in other comprehensive income, until the investment is disposed of or is determined to be impaired. At this time the cumulative gain or loss previously recognised in equity is included in the income statement for the period. Investment income is recognised using the effective interest method and taken through interest income in the income statement.

 

Loans receivable and other receivables are initially recognised at fair value and subsequently held at amortised cost using the effective interest method. Interest income, together with gains and losses when the loans and receivables are derecognised or impaired, are recognised in the income statement.

 

Subsequent to initial recognition, the fair values of financial assets measured at fair value that are quoted in active markets are based on bid prices. When independent prices are not available, fair values are determined by using valuation techniques that are consistent with techniques commonly used by the relevant market. The techniques use observable market data.

 

    

      

    

    

     

2015 

£m 

   

20141   

£m   

 
  

 

 
  

Non-current

   
  

Available-for-sale investments

  330      284     
  

 

 
  

Current

   
  

Available-for-sale investments

  1,232      2,716     
  

Loans and receivables

  1,327      883     
  

 

 
    2,559      3,599     
  

 

 
        2,889          3,883     
  

 

 
  

Financial and other investments include the following:

   
  

Investments in short-term money funds2

  618      2,165     
  

Managed investments in equity and bonds3

  785      696     
  

Bank deposits

  –      355     
  

Cash surrender value of life insurance policies

  158      140     
  

Other investments

       2     
  

Restricted balances:

   
  

Collateral4

  1,199      402     
  

Other

  127      123     
  

 

 
    2,889      3,883     
  

 

 
 

1. Comparatives have been represented on a basis consistent with current year presentation.

2. Includes £34m (2014: £nil) held by insurance captives and therefore restricted.

3. Includes £644m (2014: £667m) which is restricted and relates to investments held by insurance captives of £382m (2014: £296m), US non-qualified plan investments of £170m (2014: £141m) and assets held within security accounts with charges in favour of the UK pension scheme Trustees of £92m (2014: £230m).

4. Refers to collateral placed with counterparties with whom we have entered into a credit support annex to the ISDA (International Swaps and Derivatives Association) Master Agreement.

 

Available-for-sale investments are recorded at fair value. Due to their short maturities the carrying value of loans and receivables approximates their fair value. The maximum exposure to credit risk at the reporting date is the fair value of the financial investments. For further information on our credit risk, refer to note 30(a). None of the financial investments are past due or impaired.

    

    

     

    

    

 
 
 

LOGO

        NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15117


 

Financial Statements

 

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

11. Property, plant and equipmentcontinued

   Land and
buildings
£m
  Plant and
machinery
£m
  

Assets

in the
course of
construction
£m

  Motor
vehicles
and office
equipment
£m
  

Total 

£m 

 

 

 

Cost at 1 April 2014

   2,248    46,425    4,024    853    53,550   

Exchange adjustments

   132    2,019    82    47    2,280   

Additions

   55    544    2,514    150    3,263   

Disposals

   (30  (334  (1  (74  (439)  

Reclassifications1

   105    1,981    (2,104  8    (10)  

 

 

Cost at 31 March 2015

   2,510    50,635    4,515    984    58,644   

Exchange adjustments

   41    669    20    23    753   

Additions

   60    801    2,686    126    3,673   

Disposals

   (26  (393  (78  (62  (559)  

Reclassifications1

   173    3,060    (3,269  100    64   

 

 

Cost at 31 March 2016

   2,758    54,772    3,874    1,171    62,575   

 

 

Accumulated depreciation at 1 April 2014

   (436  (15,350      (585  (16,371)  

Exchange adjustments

   (15  (533      (29  (577)  

Depreciation charge for the year2

   (82  (1,138      (143  (1,363)  

Disposals

   7    307        74    388   

Reclassifications1

   (4  1        5      

 

 

Accumulated depreciation at 31 March 2015

   (530  (16,713      (678  (17,921)  

Exchange adjustments

   (32  (168      (10  (210)  

Depreciation charge for the year2

   (79  (1,273      (116  (1,468)  

Disposals

   6    386        61    453   

Reclassifications1

   (5  (60          (65)  

 

 

Accumulated depreciation at 31 March 2016

   (640  (17,828      (743  (19,211)  

 

 

Net book value at 31 March 2016

   2,118    36,944    3,874    428    43,364   

 

 

Net book value at 31 March 2015

   1,980    33,922    4,515    306    40,723   

 

 

1.  Represents amounts transferred between categories, (to)/from other intangible assets (see note 10) and reclasses between cost and accumulated depreciation of £64m (2015: £nil).

2.  Includes amounts in respect of capitalised depreciation of £1m (2015: £2m).

   

2016

£m

   2015 
£m 
 

 

 

Information in relation to property, plant and equipment

    

Capitalised interest included within cost

       1,622         1,506   

Net book value of assets held under finance leases (all relating to motor vehicles and office equipment)

   226     184   

Additions to assets held under finance leases (all relating to motor vehicles and office equipment)

   87     61   

Contributions to cost of property, plant and equipment included within:

    

Trade and other payables

   47     47   

Non-current liabilities

   1,649     1,569   

 

 

12. Other non-current assets

– analysis of items in the primary statements continued

 

Other non-current assets include assets that do not fall into any other non-current asset category (such as goodwill or property, plant and equipment) and the benefit to be received from the asset is not due to be received until after 31 March 2017.

 

  

14. Investments in joint ventures and associates

 

  

 

Investments in joint ventures and associates represent businesses we do not control, but instead exercise joint control or significant influence.

 

  

 

A joint venture is an arrangement established to engage in economic activity, which the Company jointly controls with other parties and has rights to the net assets of the arrangement. An associate is an entity which is neither a subsidiary nor a joint venture, but over which the Company has significant influence.

 

                      

2015 

£m 

   

2014 

£m 

  

 

  

Share of net assets at 1 April

  

         351           371 
  

Exchange adjustments

  

   (11)    (16)
  

Additions

  

   –     
  

Share of post-tax results for the year

  

   46     28 
  

Dividends received

  

   (79)    (38)
  

Other movements

  

   11     
  

 

  

Share of net assets at 31 March

  

   318     351 
  

 

 

 

A list of principal joint ventures and associates including the name, proportion of ownership and principal activity is provided in note 32.

 

The joint ventures and associates have no significant contingent liabilities to which the Group is exposed, and the Group has no significant contingent liabilities in relation to its interest in the joint ventures and associates.

 

Outstanding balances with joint ventures and associates are shown in note 28.

 

 

15. Derivative financial instruments

 

 

 

Derivatives are financial instruments that derive their value from the price of an underlying item such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, credit spreads, commodities, equity or other indices. In accordance with Board approved policies, derivatives are transacted to manage our exposure to fluctuations in interest rate and foreign exchange rate on borrowings and other contractual cash flows. Specifically, we use derivatives to manage these risks from our financing portfolio to optimise the overall cost of accessing the debt capital markets. These derivatives are analysed below. We also use derivatives to manage our operational market risks from commodities. The commodity derivative contracts are detailed in note 30(e).

 

 

 

Derivative financial instruments are initially recognised at fair value and subsequently remeasured at fair value at each reporting date. Changes in fair values are recorded in the period they arise, in either the income statement or other comprehensive income depending on the applicable accounting standards. Where the fair value of a derivative is positive it is carried as a derivative asset, and where negative as a derivative liability.

 

We calculate fair value of the financial derivatives by discounting all future cash flows using the market yield curve at the reporting date. The market yield curve for each currency is obtained from external sources for interest and foreign exchange rates. In the absence of sufficient market data, fair values would be based on the quoted market price of similar derivatives. Analysis of these derivatives and the various methods used to calculate their respective fair values is detailed below and in note 30.

 

For each class of derivative instrument type the total fair value amounts are as follows:

 

   2015 2014
   

Assets 

£m 

Liabilities 

£m 

 

Total 

£m 

 

Assets 

£m 

 

Liabilities 

£m 

 

Total 

£m 

  

 

  Interest rate swaps      1,153    (978)    175     861      (743)    118 
  Cross-currency interest rate swaps  544    (746)    (202)    1,025      (195)    830 
  Foreign exchange forward contracts  18    (294)    (276)    68      (12)    56 
  Inflation linked swaps     (381)    (380)    16      (213)        (197)
  

 

    1,716        (2,399)        (683)        1,970          (1,163)    807 
  

 

   

2016

£m

   

2015 

£m 

 

 

 

Commodity contract assets

               10                 29   

Other receivables

   37     39   

Prepayments

   35     12   

 

 
   82     80   

 

 

 

       118


 
National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16 
Financial Statements 123


Notes to the consolidated financial statements

– analysis of items in the primary statements continued

13.  Financial and other investments

 

Financial and other investments include two main categories. Assets classified as available-for-sale typically represent investments in short-term money funds and quoted investments in equities or bonds of other companies. The second category is loans and receivables which includes bank deposits with a maturity of greater than three months, and cash balances that cannot be readily used in operations, principally collateral pledged for certain borrowings.

Financial assets, liabilities and equity instruments are classified according to the substance of the contractual arrangements entered into, and recognised on trade date. Available-for-sale financial assets are non-derivatives that are either designated in this category or not classified in any other categories.

Available-for-sale financial investments are recognised at fair value plus directly related incremental transaction costs, and are subsequently carried at fair value in the statement of financial position. Changes in the fair value of available-for-sale investments are recognised directly in other comprehensive income, until the investment is disposed of or is determined to be impaired. At this time the cumulative gain or loss previously recognised in equity is included in the income statement for the period. Investment income is recognised using the effective interest method and taken through interest income in the income statement.

Loans receivable and other receivables are initially recognised at fair value and subsequently held at amortised cost using the effective interest method. Interest income, together with gains and losses when the loans and receivables are derecognised or impaired, are recognised in the income statement.

Subsequent to initial recognition, the fair values of financial assets measured at fair value that are quoted in active markets are based on bid prices. When independent prices are not available, fair values are determined by using valuation techniques that are consistent with techniques commonly used by the relevant market. The techniques use observable market data.

 

  

15. Derivative financial instrumentscontinued

 

The maturity profile of derivative financial instruments is as follows:

 

  

  

      2015   2014 
      

Assets 

£m 

   

Liabilities 

£m 

   

Total 

£m 

   

Assets 

£m 

   

Liabilities 

£m 

   

Total 

£m 

 
  

 

 
  Current            
  Less than 1 year   177      (635)     (458)     413      (339)     74   
  

 

 
     177      (635)     (458)     413      (339)     74   
  

 

 
  Non-current            
  In 1 to 2 years   15      (97)     (82)     54      (26)     28   
  In 2 to 3 years   37      (252)     (215)     73      (57)     16   
  In 3 to 4 years   136      (238)     (102)     71      (103)     (32)  
  In 4 to 5 years   125      (235)     (110)     244      (128)     116   
  More than 5 years       1,226      (942)     284      1,115      (510)     605   
  

 

 
     1,539          (1,764)         (225)         1,557      (824)     733   
  

 

 
     1,716      (2,399)     (683)     1,970      (1,163)     807   
  

 

 
 

 

For each class of derivative the notional contract1 amounts are as follows:

 

  

           

2015 

£m 

 

2014 

£m 

 
  

 

 
  

Interest rate swaps

  

     (11,125)     (15,406)  
  

Cross-currency interest rate swaps

  

   (8,103)     (8,614)  
  

Foreign exchange forward contracts

  

   (6,579)     (4,698)  
  

Inflation linked swaps

  

   (1,361)     (1,391)  
  

 

 
     (27,168)       (30,109)  
  

 

 
 

 

1. The notional contract amounts of derivatives indicate the gross nominal value of transactions outstanding at the reporting date.

 

Where possible, derivatives held as hedging instruments are formally designated as hedges as defined in IAS 39. Derivatives may qualify as hedges for accounting purposes if they are fair value hedges, cash flow hedges or net investment hedges. Our use of derivatives may entail a derivative transaction qualifying for one or more hedge type designations under IAS 39.

 

Hedge accounting allows derivatives to be designated as a hedge of another non-derivative financial instrument, to mitigate the impact of potential volatility in the income statement of changes in the fair value of the derivative instruments. To qualify for hedge accounting, documentation is prepared specifying the hedging strategy, the component transactions and methodology used for effectiveness measurement. National Grid uses three hedge accounting methods, which are described as follows:

 

Fair value hedges

Fair value hedges principally consist of interest rate and cross-currency swaps that are used to protect against changes in the fair value of fixed-rate, long-term financial instruments due to movements in market interest rates. For qualifying fair value hedges, all changes in the fair value of the derivative and changes in the fair value of the item in relation to the risk being hedged are recognised in the income statement to the extent the fair value hedge is effective. Adjustments made to the carrying amount of the hedged item for fair value hedges will be amortised over the remaining life, in line with the hedged item.

 

  

    

     

  

      

           

2015 

£m 

 

2014 

£m 

 
  

 

 
  

Cross-currency interest rate/interest rate swaps

  

   379      367   
  

 

 
 

 

Cash flow hedges

Exposure arises from the variability in future interest and currency cash flows on assets and liabilities which bear interest at variable rates or are in a foreign currency. Interest rate and cross-currency swaps are maintained, and designated as cash flow hedges, where they qualify, to manage this exposure. Fair value changes on designated cash flow hedges are initially recognised directly in the cash flow hedge reserve, as gains or losses recognised in equity and any ineffective portion is recognised immediately in the income statement. Amounts are transferred from equity and recognised in the income statement as the income or expense is recognised on the hedged item.

 

Forward foreign currency contracts are used to hedge anticipated and committed future currency cash flows. Where these contracts qualify for hedge accounting they are designated as cash flow hedges. On recognition of the underlying transaction in the financial statements, the associated hedge gains and losses, deferred in equity, are transferred and included with the recognition of the underlying transaction.

  

       

     

   

2016

£m

   

2015 

£m 

 

 

 

Non-current

    

Available-for-sale investments

   482     330   

 

 

Current

    

Available-for-sale investments

   1,951     1,232   

Loans and receivables

   1,047     1,327   

 

 
   2,998    ��2,559   

 

 
   3,480     2,889   

 

 

Financial and other investments include the following:

    

Investments in short-term money funds1

   1,516     618   

Managed investments in equity and bonds2

   615     785   

Cash surrender value of life insurance policies

   160     158   

Other investments

          

Restricted balances:

    

Collateral3

   999     1,199   

Other

   190     127   

 

 
       3,480         2,889   

 

 

 

1.
LOGOIncludes £8m (2015: £34m) held by insurance captives and therefore restricted.
2.All £615m (2015: £644m) is restricted and relates to investments held by insurance captives of £434m (2015: £382m), US non-qualified plan investments of £181m (2015: £170m) and assets held within security accounts with charges in favour of the UK pension scheme Trustees of £nil (2015: £92m).
3.Refers to collateral placed with counterparties with whom we have entered into a credit support annex to the ISDA (International Swaps and Derivatives Association) Master Agreement.

Available-for-sale investments are recorded at fair value. Due to their short maturities the carrying value of loans and receivables approximates their fair value. The maximum exposure to credit risk at the reporting date is the fair value of the financial investments. For further information on our credit risk, refer to note 30(a). None of the financial investments are past due or impaired.

 

        NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15124 119National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16
Financial Statements


 

Financial Statements

 

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

14. Investments in joint ventures and associates

– analysis of items in the primary statements continued

 

Investments in joint ventures and associates represent businesses we do not control, but instead exercise joint control or significant influence.

A joint venture is an arrangement established to engage in economic activity, which the Company jointly controls with other parties and has rights to the net assets of the arrangement. An associate is an entity which is neither a subsidiary nor a joint venture, but over which the Company has significant influence.

 

  

15. Derivative financial instrumentscontinued

 

Cash flow hedgescontinued

When a forecast transaction is no longer expected to occur, the cumulative gain or loss previously reported in equity is transferred to the income statement.

 

Where a non-financial asset or a non-financial liability results from a forecast transaction or firm commitment being hedged, the amounts deferred in equity are included in the initial measurement of that non-monetary asset or liability.

 

  

  

   

   

      

2015 

£m 

   

2014 

£m 

 
  

 

 
  Cross-currency interest rate/interest rate swaps   (453)     224   
  Foreign exchange forward contracts   (34)     (11)  
  Inflation linked swaps   (109)     (32)  
  

 

 
         (596)         181   
  

 

 
 

 

Net investment hedges

Borrowings, cross-currency swaps and forward currency contracts are used in the management of the foreign exchange exposure arising from the investment in non-sterling denominated subsidiaries. Where these contracts qualify for hedge accounting they are designated as net investment hedges.

 

  

    

   

2015 

£m 

 

2014 

£m 

 
  

 

 
  Cross-currency interest rate swaps   (72)     342   
  Foreign exchange forward contracts   (218)     66   
  

 

 
     (290)     408   
  

 

 
 

 

The cross-currency swaps and forward foreign currency contracts are hedge accounted using the spot to spot method. The foreign exchange gain or loss on retranslation of the borrowings and the spot to spot movements on the cross-currency swaps and forward currency contracts are transferred to equity to offset gains or losses on translation of the net investment in the non-sterling denominated subsidiaries, with any ineffective portion recognised immediately in the income statement.

 

Derivatives not in a formal hedge relationship

Our policy is not to use derivatives for trading purposes. However, due to the complex nature of hedge accounting under IAS 39 some derivatives may not qualify for hedge accounting, or are specifically not designated as a hedge where natural offset is more appropriate. Changes in the fair value of any derivative instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting are recognised in remeasurements within the income statement.

 

     

  

     

   

2015 

£m 

 

2014 

£m 

 
  

 

 
  Cross-currency interest rate/interest rate swaps   119      15   
  Foreign exchange forward contracts   (24)       
  Inflation linked swaps   (271)     (165)  
  

 

 
     (176)     (149)  
  

 

 
 

 

Discontinuation of hedge accounting

Hedge accounting is discontinued when the hedging instrument expires or is sold, terminated, exercised or no longer qualifies for hedge accounting. At that time, any cumulative gains or losses relating to cash flow hedges recognised in equity are initially retained in equity and subsequently recognised in the income statement in the same periods in which the previously hedged item affects profit or loss. Amounts deferred in equity with respect to net investment hedges are subsequently recognised in the income statement in the event of the disposal of the overseas operations concerned. For fair value hedges, the cumulative adjustment recorded to the carrying value of the hedged item at the date hedge accounting is discontinued is amortised to the income statement using the effective interest method.

 

Embedded derivatives

No adjustment is made with respect to derivative clauses embedded in financial instruments or other contracts that are defined as closely related to those instruments or contracts. Consequently these embedded derivatives are not accounted for separately from the debt instrument. Where there are embedded derivatives in host contracts not closely related, the embedded derivative is separately accounted for as a derivative financial instrument.

  

        

  

     

 
 
       2016
£m
      2015 
£m 
 

 

 

Share of net assets at 1 April

   318    351   

Exchange adjustments

   21    (11)  

Additions

   116    –   

Disposals

   (52  –   

Share of post-tax results for the year

   59    46   

Dividends received

   (72  (79)  

Other movements

   7    11   

 

 

Share of net assets at 31 March

   397    318   

 

 

A list of joint ventures and associates including the name, proportion of ownership and principal activity is provided in note 32.

The joint ventures and associates have no significant contingent liabilities to which the Group is exposed, and the Group has no significant contingent liabilities in relation to its interest in the joint ventures and associates. The Group has capital commitments of £305m in relation to joint ventures.

Outstanding balances with joint ventures and associates are shown in note 28.

The Group’s only material joint venture or associate is in respect of its 50% equity stake in BritNed Development Limited.

Summarised financial information of this joint venture together with the carrying amount of the investment in the consolidated financial statements is as follows:

 

   

    2016

£m

  

    2015 

£m 

 

 

 

Statement of financial position – BritNed Development Limited

   

Non-current assets

   376    355   

Cash and cash equivalents

   77    46   

All other current assets

   3      

Non-current liabilities

   (8  (10)  

Current liabilities

   (30  (14)  

 

 

Equity

   418    379   

 

 

Carrying amount of the Group’s investment (National Grid ownership 50%)

   209    189   

 

 
   2016
£m
  2015 
£m 
 

 

 

Income statement – BritNed Development Limited

   

Revenue

   198    162   

Depreciation and amortisation

   (11  (12)  

Other costs

   (56  (66)  

 

 

Operating profit

   131    84   

 

 

Finance income and expense

       –   

Income tax expense

   (32  (21)  

 

 

Profit for the year

   99    63   

 

 

Group’s share in profit (National Grid ownership 50%)

   50    32   

 

 

 

       120


 
National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16 
Financial Statements 125


Notes to the consolidated financial statements

– analysis of items in the primary statements continued

15. Derivative financial instruments

 

Derivatives are financial instruments that derive their value from the price of an underlying item such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, credit spreads, commodities, equity or other indices. In accordance with Board approved policies, derivatives are transacted to manage our exposure to fluctuations in interest rate and foreign exchange rate on borrowings and other contractual cash flows. Specifically, we use derivatives to manage these risks from our financing portfolio to optimise the overall cost of accessing the debt capital markets. These derivatives are analysed below. We also use derivatives to manage our operational market risks from commodities. The commodity derivative contracts are detailed in note 30(e).

Derivative financial instruments are initially recognised at fair value and subsequently remeasured at fair value at each reporting date. Changes in fair values are recorded in the period they arise, in either the income statement or other comprehensive income depending on the applicable accounting standards. Where the fair value of a derivative is positive it is carried as a derivative asset, and where negative as a derivative liability.

We calculate fair value of the financial derivatives by discounting all future cash flows using the market yield curve at the reporting date. The market yield curve for each currency is obtained from external sources for interest and foreign exchange rates. In the absence of sufficient market data, fair values would be based on the quoted market price of similar derivatives. Analysis of these derivatives and the various methods used to calculate their respective fair values is detailed below and in note 30.

For each class of derivative instrument type the total fair value amounts are as follows:

 

  

16. Inventories and current intangible assets

 

  

  

 

Inventories represent assets that we intend to use in order to generate revenue in the short term, either by selling the asset itself (for example fuel stocks) or by using it to fulfil a service to a customer or to maintain our network (consumables).

 

   

  

 

Inventories are stated at the lower of weighted average cost and net realisable value.

 

Where applicable, cost comprises direct materials and direct labour costs as well as those overheads that have been incurred in bringing the inventories to their present location and condition.

 

Emission allowances, principally relating to the emissions of carbon dioxide in the UK and sulphur and nitrous oxides in the US, are recorded as intangible assets within current assets and are initially recorded at cost and subsequently at the lower of cost and net realisable value. Where emission allowances are granted by relevant authorities, cost is deemed to be equal to the fair value at the date of allocation. Receipts of such grants are treated as deferred income, which is recognised in the income statement as the related charges for emissions are recognised or on impairment of the related intangible asset. A provision is recorded in respect of the obligation to deliver emission allowances and emission charges are recognised in the income statement in the period in which emissions are made.

 

  

   

        

     

2015 

£m 

   

2014 

£m 

 
  

 

 
  

Fuel stocks

        112      74   
  

Raw materials and consumables

  152      128   
  

Work in progress

  13      13   
  

Current intangible assets – emission allowances

  63      53   
  

 

 
    340            268   
  

 

 
 

 

There is a provision for obsolescence of £28m against inventories as at 31 March 2015 (2014: £29m).

  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   2016   2015 
   
 
      Assets
£m
  
  
   
 
    Liabilities
£m
  
  
  
 
    Total 
£m 
  
  
   
 
      Assets
£m
  
  
   
 
    Liabilities
£m
  
  
  
 
    Total 
£m 
  
  

 

 

Interest rate swaps

   1,095     (908  187      1,153     (978  175   

Cross-currency interest rate swaps

   690     (589  101      544     (746  (202)  

Foreign exchange forward contracts

   159     (135  24      18     (294  (276)  

Inflation linked swaps

   1     (420  (419)     1     (381  (380)  

Equity options

   18     (17                –   

 

 
   1,963     (2,069  (106)     1,716     (2,399  (683)  

 

 

 

The maturity profile of derivative financial instruments is as follows:

 

  

   2016   2015 
   

Assets

£m

   

Liabilities

£m

  Total 
£m 
   

Assets

£m

   

Liabilities

£m

  Total 
£m 
 

 

 

Current

          

Less than 1 year

   278     (337  (59)     177     (635  (458)  

 

 
   278     (337  (59)     177     (635  (458)  

 

 

Non-current

          

In 1 to 2 years

   31     (213  (182)     15     (97  (82)  

In 2 to 3 years

   159     (221  (62)     37     (252  (215)  

In 3 to 4 years

   139     (159  (20)     136     (238  (102)  

In 4 to 5 years

   32     (155  (123)     125     (235  (110)  

More than 5 years

   1,324     (984  340      1,226     (942  284   

 

 
   1,685     (1,732  (47)     1,539     (1,764  (225)  

 

 
   1,963     (2,069  (106)     1,716     (2,399  (683)  

 

 

 

For each class of derivative the notional contract1 amounts are as follows:

 

  

                  

2016

£m

  

2015 

£m 

 

 

 

Interest rate swaps

          (10,552  (11,125)  

Cross-currency interest rate swaps

          (8,316  (8,103)  

Foreign exchange forward contracts

          (6,903  (6,579)  

Inflation linked swaps

          (1,394  (1,361)  

Equity options

          (800  –   

 

 
          (27,965  (27,168)  

 

 

1. The notional contract amounts of derivatives indicate the gross nominal value of transactions outstanding at the reporting date.

LOGO

Where possible, derivatives held as hedging instruments are formally designated as hedges as defined in IAS 39. Derivatives may qualify as hedges for accounting purposes if they are fair value hedges, cash flow hedges or net investment hedges. Our use of derivatives may entail a derivative transaction qualifying for one or more hedge type designations under IAS 39.

Hedge accounting allows derivatives to be designated as a hedge of another non-derivative financial instrument, to mitigate the impact of potential volatility in the income statement of changes in the fair value of the derivative instruments. To qualify for hedge accounting, documentation is prepared specifying the hedging strategy, the component transactions and methodology used for effectiveness measurement. National Grid uses three hedge accounting methods, which are described as follows:

 

        NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15126 121National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16
Financial Statements


 

Financial Statements

 

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

– analysis of items in the primary statements continued

 

    

    

  

17. Trade and other receivables

 

  

  

 

Trade and other receivables are amounts which are due from our customers for services (and commodities in the US) we have provided. Other receivables also include prepayments made by us, for example, property lease rentals paid in advance.

 

   

  

 

Trade and other receivables are initially recognised at fair value and subsequently measured at amortised cost, less any appropriate allowances for estimated irrecoverable amounts. A provision is established for irrecoverable amounts when there is objective evidence that amounts due under the original payment terms will not be collected.

 

    

      

2015 

£m 

   

2014   

  £m   

 
  

 

 
  

Trade receivables

       1,568         1,602     
  

Prepayments and accrued income

   1,081     1,090     
  

Commodity contract assets

   35     42     
  

Current tax assets

   60     11     
  

Other receivables

   92     110     
  

 

 
     2,836     2,855     
  

 

 
 

 

Trade receivables are non interest-bearing and generally have a 30 to 90 day term. Due to their short maturities, the fair value of trade and other receivables approximates their book value. Commodity contract assets are recorded at fair value. All other receivables are recorded at amortised cost.

    

 

 

Provision for impairment of receivables

 

  

   

2015 

£m 

 

2014    

£m    

 
  

 

 
  

At 1 April

   249      261    
  

Exchange adjustments

   31      (23)   
  

Charge for the year, net of recoveries

   126      105    
  

Uncollectible amounts written off against receivables

   (112)     (94)   
  

 

 
  

At 31 March

   294      249    
  

 

 
 

 

Trade receivables past due but not impaired

 

  

   

2015 

£m 

 

20141   

£m   

 
  

 

 
  

Up to 3 months past due

   299      285     
  

3 to 6 months past due

   60      57     
  

Over 6 months past due

   156      91     
  

 

 
     515      433     
  

 

 
 

 

1. Comparatives have been represented on a basis consistent with the current year presentation.

 

For further information on our wholesale and retail credit risk, refer to note 30(a). For further information on our commodity risk, refer to note 30(e).

  

   

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

    

15. Derivative financial instrumentscontinued

Fair value hedges

Fair value hedges principally consist of interest rate and cross-currency swaps that are used to protect against changes in the fair value of fixed-rate, long-term financial instruments due to movements in market interest rates. For qualifying fair value hedges, all changes in the fair value of the derivative and changes in the fair value of the item in relation to the risk being hedged are recognised in the income statement to the extent the fair value hedge is effective. Adjustments made to the carrying amount of the hedged item for fair value hedges will be amortised over the remaining life, in line with the hedged item.

     2016
£m
     2015 
£m 
 

 

 

Cross-currency interest rate/interest rate swaps

     482       379   

 

 

Cash flow hedges

Exposure arises from the variability in future interest and currency cash flows on assets and liabilities which bear interest at variable rates or are in a foreign currency. Interest rate and cross-currency swaps are maintained, and designated as cash flow hedges, where they qualify, to manage this exposure. Fair value changes on designated cash flow hedges are initially recognised directly in the cash flow hedge reserve, as gains or losses recognised in equity, and any ineffective portion is recognised immediately in the income statement. Amounts are transferred from equity and recognised in the income statement as the income or expense is recognised on the hedged item.

Forward foreign currency contracts are used to hedge anticipated and committed future currency cash flows. Where these contracts qualify for hedge accounting they are designated as cash flow hedges. On recognition of the underlying transaction in the financial statements, the associated hedge gains and losses, deferred in equity, are transferred and included with the recognition of the underlying transaction.

When a forecast transaction is no longer expected to occur, the cumulative gain or loss previously reported in equity is transferred to the income statement.

Where a non-financial asset or a non-financial liability results from a forecast transaction or firm commitment being hedged, the amounts deferred in equity are included in the initial measurement of that non-monetary asset or liability.

   2016
£m
       2015 
£m 
 

 

 

Cross-currency interest rate/interest rate swaps

   (46   (453)  

Foreign exchange forward contracts

   47     (34)  

Inflation linked swaps

   (151   (109)  

 

 
   (150   (596)  

 

 

Net investment hedges

Borrowings, cross-currency swaps and forward currency contracts are used in the management of the foreign exchange exposure arising from the investment in non-sterling denominated subsidiaries. Where these contracts qualify for hedge accounting they are designated as net investment hedges.

   2016
£m
       2015 
£m 
 

 

 

Cross-currency interest rate swaps

   (199   (72)  

Foreign exchange forward contracts

   (100   (218)  

 

 
   (299   (290)  

 

 

The cross-currency swaps and forward foreign currency contracts are hedge accounted using the spot to spot method. The foreign exchange gain or loss on retranslation of the borrowings and the spot to spot movements on the cross-currency swaps and forward currency contracts are transferred to equity to offset gains or losses on translation of the net investment in the non-sterling denominated subsidiaries, with any ineffective portion recognised immediately in the income statement.

 

       122


 
National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16 
Financial Statements 127


Notes to the consolidated financial statements

– analysis of items in the primary statements continued

15. Derivative financial instrumentscontinued

Derivatives not in a formal hedge relationship

Our policy is not to use derivatives for trading purposes. However, due to the complex nature of hedge accounting under IAS 39 some derivatives may not qualify for hedge accounting, or are specifically not designated as a hedge where natural offset is more appropriate. Changes in the fair value of any derivative instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting are recognised in remeasurements within the income statement.

       2016
£m
      2015 
£m 
 

 

 

Cross-currency interest rate/interest rate swaps

   51    119   

Foreign exchange forward contracts

   77    (24)  

Inflation linked swaps

   (268  (271)  

Equity options

   1    –   

 

 
   (139  (176)  

 

 

Discontinuation of hedge accounting

Hedge accounting is discontinued when the hedging instrument expires or is sold, terminated, exercised or no longer qualifies for hedge accounting. At that time, any cumulative gains or losses relating to cash flow hedges recognised in equity are initially retained in equity and subsequently recognised in the income statement in the same periods in which the previously hedged item affects profit or loss. Amounts deferred in equity with respect to net investment hedges are subsequently recognised in the income statement in the event of the disposal of the overseas operations concerned. For fair value hedges, the cumulative adjustment recorded to the carrying value of the hedged item at the date hedge accounting is discontinued is amortised to the income statement using the effective interest method.

Embedded derivatives

No adjustment is made with respect to derivative clauses embedded in financial instruments or other contracts that are defined as closely related to those instruments or contracts. Consequently these embedded derivatives are not accounted for separately from the debt instrument. Where there are embedded derivatives in host contracts not closely related, the embedded derivative is separately accounted for as a derivative financial instrument.

16. Inventories and current intangible assets

 

Inventories represent assets that we intend to use in order to generate revenue in the short term, either by selling the asset itself (for example fuel stocks) or by using it to fulfil a service to a customer or to maintain our network (consumables).

Inventories are stated at the lower of weighted average cost and net realisable value.

Where applicable, cost comprises direct materials and direct labour costs as well as those overheads that have been incurred in bringing the inventories to their present location and condition.

Emission allowances, principally relating to the emissions of carbon dioxide in the UK and sulphur and nitrous oxides in the US, are recorded as intangible assets within current assets and are initially recorded at cost and subsequently at the lower of cost and net realisable value. Where emission allowances are granted by relevant authorities, cost is deemed to be equal to the fair value at the date of allocation. Receipts of such grants are treated as deferred income, which is recognised in the income statement as the related charges for emissions are recognised or on impairment of the related intangible asset. A provision is recorded in respect of the obligation to deliver emission allowances and emission charges are recognised in the income statement in the period in which emissions are made.

 

  

18. Cash and cash equivalents

 

  

  

 

Cash and cash equivalents include cash balances, together with short-term investments with an original maturity of less than three months that are readily convertible to cash.

 

   

  

 

Net cash and cash equivalents reflected in the cash flow statement are net of bank overdrafts, which are reported in borrowings. The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents and bank overdrafts approximate their fair values.

 

Cash at bank earns interest at floating rates based on daily bank deposit rates. Short-term deposits are made for periods varying between one day and three months, depending on the immediate cash requirements, and earn interest at the respective short-term deposit rates.

 

Net cash and cash equivalents held in currencies other than sterling have been converted into sterling at year-end exchange rates. For further information on currency exposures, refer to note 30(d).

 

   

    

   

      

2015

£m

  

2014    

£m    

 
  

 

 
  Cash at bank   109    75     
  Short-term deposits   10    279     
  

 

 
  Cash and cash equivalents excluding bank overdrafts   119    354     
  Bank overdrafts   (3  (15)    
  

 

 
  Net cash and cash equivalents   116    339     
  

 

 
 

 

At 31 March 2015, £1m (2014: £24m) of cash and cash equivalents were restricted. This primarily relates to cash held in captive insurance companies.

 

19. Borrowings

 

   

  

 

We borrow money primarily in the form of bonds and bank loans. These are for a fixed term and may have fixed or floating interest rates or are linked to RPI. As indicated in note 15, we use derivatives to manage risks associated with interest rates and foreign exchange.

 

Our strategy in action

Our price controls and rate plans require us to fund our networks within a certain ratio of debt to equity and, as a result, we have issued a significant amount of debt. As we continue to invest in our networks, the value of debt is expected to increase over time. To maintain a strong balance sheet and to allow us to access capital markets at commercially acceptable interest rates, we balance the amount of debt we issue with the value of our assets, and take account of certain other metrics used by credit rating agencies.

    

  

     

 

 

Borrowings, which include interest-bearing and inflation linked debt and overdrafts, are recorded at their initial fair value which normally reflects the proceeds received, net of direct issue costs less any repayments. Subsequently these are stated at amortised cost, using the effective interest method. Any difference between the proceeds after direct issue costs and the redemption value is recognised over the term of the borrowing in the income statement using the effective interest method.

 

     

   

2015

£m

 

2014  

£m  

 
  

 

 
  Current   
  Bank loans   561    1,485    
  Bonds   1,068    1,730    
  Commercial paper   1,349    252    
  Finance leases   44    19    
  Other loans   3    10    
  Bank overdrafts   3    15    
  

 

 
     3,028    3,511    
  

 

 
  Non-current   
  Bank loans   1,417    1,414    
  Bonds   21,156    20,732    
  Finance leases   159    151    
  Other loans   150    142    
  

 

 
     22,882    22,439    
  

 

 
     25,910    25,950    
  

 

 
       2016
£m
       2015 
£m 
 

 

 

Fuel stocks

   120     112   

Raw materials and consumables

   203     152   

Work in progress

   13     13   

Current intangible assets – emission allowances

   101     63   

 

 
   437     340   

 

 

There is a provision for obsolescence of £28m against inventories as at 31 March 2016 (2015: £28m).

LOGO

 

        NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15128 123National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16
Financial Statements


 

Financial Statements

 

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

17. Trade and other receivables

– analysis of items in the primary statements continued

 

Trade and other receivables are amounts which are due from our customers for services (and commodities in the US) we have provided. Other receivables also include prepayments made by us, for example, property lease rentals paid in advance.

Trade and other receivables are initially recognised at fair value and subsequently measured at amortised cost, less any appropriate allowances for estimated irrecoverable amounts. A provision is established for irrecoverable amounts when there is objective evidence that amounts due under the original payment terms will not be collected.

 

  

19. Borrowingscontinued

 

    
  

Total borrowings are repayable as follows:

 

    
      2015      2014    
      £m      £m    
  

 

  Less than 1 year  3,028     3,511  
  In 1 to 2 years  873     895  
  In 2 to 3 years  1,601     1,177  
  In 3 to 4 years  1,437     1,661  
  In 4 to 5 years  1,709     1,509  
  More than 5 years:    
      by instalments  154     175  
      other than by instalments  17,108     17,022  
  

 

    25,910     25,950  
  

 

 

 

The fair value of borrowings at 31 March 2015 was £30,103m (2014: £28,131m). Where market values were available, fair value of borrowings (Level 1) was £14,583m (2014: £17,388m). Where market values were not available, fair value of borrowings (Level 2) was £15,520m (2014: £10,743m), calculated by discounting cash flows at prevailing interest rates. The notional amount outstanding of the debt portfolio at 31 March 2015 was £25,419m (2014: £25,539m).

 

 

The assets of the Colonial Gas Company and the Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation and certain gas distribution assets of the Narragansett Electric Company are subject to liens and other charges and are provided as collateral over borrowings totalling £424m at 31 March 2015 (2014: £438m).

 

 

Collateral is placed with or received from any counterparty where we have entered into a credit support annex to the ISDA Master Agreement once the current mark-to-market valuation of the trades between the parties exceeds an agreed threshold. Included in current bank loans is £540m (2014: £843m) in respect of cash received under collateral agreements. For further details of our borrowing facilities, refer to note 31. For further details of our bonds in issue, please refer to the debt investor section of our website.

 

 

Assets held under finance leases are recognised at their fair value or, if lower, the present value of the minimum lease payments on inception. The corresponding liability is recognised as a finance lease obligation within borrowings. Rental payments are apportioned between finance costs and reduction in the finance lease obligation, so as to achieve a constant rate of interest.

 

 

Assets held under finance leases are depreciated over the shorter of their useful life and the lease term.

 

 

Finance lease obligations

 

   2015 2014 
   £m £m 
  

 

  Gross finance lease liabilities are repayable as follows:    
  

Less than 1 year

  44   19 
  

1 to 5 years

  125   89 
  More than 5 years  72   100 
  

 

    241   208 
  Less: finance charges allocated to future periods  (38)  (38)
  

 

    203   170 
  

 

  The present value of finance lease liabilities is as follows:    
  

Less than 1 year

  44   19 
  

1 to 5 years

  110   70 
  More than 5 years  49   81 
  

 

    203   170 
  

 

 
 
 
 
   

    2016

£m

   

    2015 

£m 

 

 

 

Trade receivables

   1,276     1,568   

Accrued income

   796     852   

Prepayments

   212     229   

Commodity contract assets

   22     35   

Current tax assets

   77     60   

Other receivables

   89     92   

 

 
   2,472     2,836   

 

 

Trade receivables are non interest-bearing and generally have a 30 to 90 day term. Due to their short maturities, the fair value of trade and other receivables approximates their book value. Commodity contract assets are recorded at fair value. All other receivables are recorded at amortised cost.

Provision for impairment of receivables

 

       2016
£m
      2015 
£m 
 

 

 

At 1 April

   294    249   

Exchange adjustments

   11    31   

Charge for the year, net of recoveries

   158    126   

Uncollectible amounts written off against receivables

   (114  (112)  

 

 

At 31 March

   349    294   

 

 

Trade receivables past due but not impaired

      2016
£m
       2015 
£m 
 

 

 

Up to 3 months past due

  214     299   

3 to 6 months past due

  48     60   

Over 6 months past due

  142     156   

 

 
  404     515   

 

 

For further information on our wholesale and retail credit risk, refer to note 30(a). For further information on our commodity risk, refer to note 30(e).

 

       124National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements129


Notes to the consolidated financial statements

– analysis of items in the primary statements continued

18. Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include cash balances, together with short-term investments with an original maturity of less than three months that are readily convertible to cash.

Net cash and cash equivalents reflected in the cash flow statement are net of bank overdrafts, which are reported in borrowings. The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents and bank overdrafts approximate their fair values.

Cash at bank earns interest at floating rates based on daily bank deposit rates. Short-term deposits are made for periods varying between one day and three months, depending on the immediate cash requirements, and earn interest at the respective short-term deposit rates.

Net cash and cash equivalents held in currencies other than sterling have been converted into sterling at year-end exchange rates. For further information on currency exposures, refer to note 30(d).

       2016
£m
      2015 
£m 
 

 

 

Cash at bank

   126    109   

Short-term deposits

   1    10   

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents excluding bank overdrafts

   127    119   

Bank overdrafts

   (3  (3)  

 

 

Net cash and cash equivalents

   124    116   

 

 

At 31 March 2016, £2m (2015: £1m) of cash and cash equivalents were restricted. This primarily relates to cash held in captive insurance companies.

19. Borrowings

We borrow money primarily in the form of bonds and bank loans. These are for a fixed term and may have fixed or floating interest rates or are linked to RPI. As indicated in note 15, we use derivatives to manage risks associated with interest rates and foreign exchange.

Our strategy in action

Our price controls and rate plans require us to fund our networks within a certain ratio of debt to equity and, as a result, we have issued a significant amount of debt. As we continue to invest in our networks, the value of debt is expected to increase over time. To maintain a strong balance sheet and to allow us to access capital markets at commercially acceptable interest rates, we balance the amount of debt we issue with the value of our assets, and take account of certain other metrics used by credit rating agencies.

Borrowings, which include interest-bearing and inflation linked debt and overdrafts, are recorded at their initial fair value which normally reflects the proceeds received, net of direct issue costs less any repayments. Subsequently these are stated at amortised cost, using the effective interest method. Any difference between the proceeds after direct issue costs and the redemption value is recognised over the term of the borrowing in the income statement using the effective interest method.

       2016
£m
   

    2015 

£m 

 

 

 

Current

    

Bank loans

   1,179     561   

Bonds

   1,282     1,068   

Commercial paper

   1,092     1,349   

Finance leases

   53     44   

Other loans

   2       

Bank overdrafts

   3       

 

 
   3,611     3,028   

 

 

Non-current

    

Bank loans

   1,816     1,417   

Bonds

   22,556     21,156   

Finance leases

   190     159   

Other loans

   171     150   

 

 
   24,733     22,882   

 

 

Total borrowings

   28,344     25,910   

 

 

130National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements 


 

   Financial Statements

19. Borrowingscontinued

Total borrowings are repayable as follows:

   

2016

£m

   

2015 

£m 

 

 

 

Less than 1 year

   3,611     3,028   

In 1 to 2 years

   1,835     873   

In 2 to 3 years

   1,816     1,601   

In 3 to 4 years

   1,775     1,437   

In 4 to 5 years

   2,276     1,709   

More than 5 years:

    

by instalments

   742     154   

other than by instalments

   16,289     17,108   

 

 
       28,344         25,910   

 

 

The fair value of borrowings at 31 March 2016 was £31,463m (2015: £30,103m). Where market values were available, fair value of borrowings (Level 1) was £13,283m (2015: £14,583m). Where market values were not available, fair value of borrowings (Level 2) was £18,180m (2015: £15,520m), calculated by discounting cash flows at prevailing interest rates. The notional amount outstanding of the debt portfolio at 31 March 2016 was £27,836m (2015: £25,419m).

The assets of the Colonial Gas Company and the Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation and certain gas distribution assets of the Narragansett Electric Company are subject to liens and other charges and are provided as collateral over borrowings totalling £385m at 31 March 2016 (2015: £424m).

Collateral is placed with or received from any counterparty where we have entered into a credit support annex to the ISDA Master Agreement once the current mark-to-market valuation of the trades between the parties exceeds an agreed threshold. Included in current bank loans is £610m (2015: £540m) in respect of cash received under collateral agreements. For further details of our borrowing facilities, refer to note 31. For further details of our bonds in issue, please refer to the debt investor section of our website.

Assets held under finance leases are recognised at their fair value or, if lower, the present value of the minimum lease payments on inception. The corresponding liability is recognised as a finance lease obligation within borrowings. Rental payments are apportioned between finance costs and reduction in the finance lease obligation, so as to achieve a constant rate of interest.

Assets held under finance leases are depreciated over the shorter of their useful life and the lease term.

Finance lease obligations

   

2016

£m

  

2015 

£m 

 

 

 

Gross finance lease liabilities are repayable as follows:

   

Less than 1 year

   53    44   

1 to 5 years

   156    125   

More than 5 years

   75    72   

 

 
   284    241   

Less: finance charges allocated to future periods

   (41  (38)  

 

 
   243    203   

 

 

The present value of finance lease liabilities is as follows:

   

Less than 1 year

   53    44   

1 to 5 years

   137    110   

More than 5 years

   53    49   

 

 
            243             203   

 

 

 

 

Unaudited commentary on borrowings

 

As at 31 March 2015,2016, total borrowings of £25,910m (2014: £25,950m)£28,344m (2015: £25,910m) including bonds, bank loans, commercial paper, collateral, finance leases and other debt had decreasedincreased by £40m. This represents the ongoing refinancing of the debt portfolio.£2,434m. We expect to repay £3,028m£3,611m of our total borrowings in the next 12 months including commercial paper, collateral and interest, and to fund this repayment through the capital and money markets. The average long-term debt maturity of the portfolio is 12 years (2015: 13 years (2014: 12 years).

The maturity profile of long-term debt in our major entities is illustrated below:

National Grid long-term debt maturity profile £m

LOGO

1. Includes hybrid bonds at first callable date (euro: 2020; sterling: 2025). Actual maturity of these bonds is euro: 2076; sterling: 2073.

Further information on our bonds can be found in the debt investor section of our website.

 

 

LOGO

        NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15125


Financial Statements

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

– analysis of items in the primary statements continued

  

20. Trade and other payables

 

    
  

 

Trade and other payables include amounts owed to suppliers, tax authorities and other parties which are due to be settled within 12 months. The total also includes deferred income, which represents monies received from customers but for which we have not yet delivered the associated service. These amounts are recognised as revenue when the service is provided.

 

  

 

Trade payables are initially recognised at fair value and subsequently measured at amortised cost.

 

      2015   2014 
      £m   £m 
  

 

  Trade payables  2,050   1,942 
  Deferred income  236   224 
  Commodity contract liabilities  116   77 
  Social security and other taxes  196   146 
  Other payables  694   642 
  

 

    3,292   3,031 
  

 

 

 

Due to their short maturities, the fair value of trade and other payables approximates their book value. Commodity contract liabilities are recorded at fair value. All other trade and other payables are recorded at amortised cost.

 

 

21. Other non-current liabilities

 

 

 

Other non-current liabilities include deferred income which will not be recognised as income until after 31 March 2016. It also includes payables that are not due until after that date.

 

 

 

Commodity contract liabilities are recorded at fair value. All other non-current liabilities are recorded at amortised cost.

 

   2015 2014 
   £m £m 
  

 

  Deferred income  1,648   1,605 
  Commodity contract liabilities  55   46 
  Other payables  216   190 
  

 

    1,919   1,841 
  

 

 

 

There is no material difference between the fair value and the carrying value of other non-current liabilities.

 

 

22. Pensions and other post-retirement benefits

 

 

 

Substantially all our employees are members of either DB (defined benefit) or DC (defined contribution) pension plans. The principal UK plans are the National Grid UK Pension Scheme, the National Grid Electricity Group of the Electricity Supply Pension Scheme and The National Grid YouPlan. In the US, we have a number of plans and also provide healthcare and life insurance benefits to eligible retired US employees.

 

 

The fair value of associated plan assets and present value of DB obligations are updated annually. For further details and the actuarial assumptions used to value the obligations, see note 29.

 

 

We separately present our UK and US pension plans to show geographical split. Below we provide a more detailed analysis of the amounts recorded in the primary financial statements.

 

 

 

For DC plans, the Group pays contributions into separate funds on behalf of the employee and has no further obligations to employees. The risks associated with this type of plan are assumed by the member.

 

 

For DB retirement plans, members receive benefits on retirement, the value of which is dependent on factors such as salary and length of pensionable service. The Group underwrites both financial and demographic risks associated with this type of plan.

 

 The cost of providing benefits in a DB plan is determined using the projected unit method, with actuarial valuations being carried out at each reporting date by a qualified actuary. This valuation method is an accrued benefits valuation method that makes allowance for projected earnings.
 

       126


  

22. Pensions and other post-retirement benefitscontinued

 

  

The Group’s obligation in respect of DB pension plans is calculated separately for each plan by projecting the estimated amount of future benefit payments that employees have earned for their pensionable service in the current and prior periods. These future benefit payments are discounted to determine the present value of the liabilities and the fair value of plan assets and any unrecognised past service cost is then deducted. The discount rate used is the yield at the valuation date on high-quality corporate bonds.

 

  

The Group takes advice from independent actuaries relating to the appropriateness of any key assumptions applied which include life expectancy of members, expected salary and pension increases, and inflation. It should be noted that comparatively small changes in the assumptions used may have a significant effect on the amounts recognised in the income statement and the statement of other comprehensive income and the net liability recognised in the statement of financial position.

 

  

Remeasurements of net retirement obligations are recognised in full in the period in which they occur in the statement of other comprehensive income.

 

  Risks
  

The DB pension obligations and other post-retirement benefit liabilities are exposed to the primary risks outlined below.

 

  

Liabilities are calculated using discount rates set with reference to yields on high-quality corporate bonds prevailing in the US and UK debt markets and will fluctuate as yields change. Plan funds are invested in a variety of asset classes, principally: equities, government securities, corporate bonds and property. Consequently, actual returns will differ from the underlying discount rate adopted and therefore have an impact on the net balance sheet liability.

 

  

Changes in inflation will affect both current and future pension payments and are partially mitigated through investment in inflation matching assets and hedging instruments.

 

  

Longevity is also a key driver of liabilities and changes in expected mortality will have a direct impact on liabilities. The liabilities are, in aggregate, relatively mature which serves to mitigate this risk to some extent.

 

  

Each plan’s investment strategy seeks to balance the level of investment return sought with the aim of reducing volatility and risk. In undertaking this approach reference is made both to the maturity of the liabilities and the funding level of that plan. A number of further strategies are employed to manage underlying risks, including liability matching asset strategies, diversification of asset portfolios, interest rate hedging and active management of foreign exchange exposure.

 

  

Amounts recognised in the statement of financial position

 

      UK pensions    US pensions    US other post-retirement benefits
      2015     2014     2013       2015     2014     2013       2015     2014     2013   
      £m     £m     £m       £m     £m     £m       £m     £m     £m   
  

 

  

Present value of funded obligations

  (20,053)   (18,100)   (18,495)    (5,827)   (4,566)   (4,915)    (3,412)   (2,680)   (3,020) 
  

Fair value of plan assets

  19,453    17,409    17,392     5,052    4,229    4,378     1,903    1,620    1,515  
  

 

    (600)   (691)   (1,103)    (775)   (337)   (537)    (1,509)   (1,060)   (1,505) 
  

Present value of unfunded obligations

  (72)   (62)   (66)    (228)   (186)   (200)    –    –    –  
  

Other post-employment liabilities

  –    –    –     –    –    (3)    (74)   (75)   (83) 
  

 

  

Net defined benefit liability

  (672)   (753)   (1,169)    (1,003)   (523)   (740)    (1,583)   (1,135)   (1,588) 
  

 

  

Represented by:

                    
  

Liabilities

  (672)   (753)   (1,169)    (1,124)   (697)   (935)    (1,583)   (1,135)   (1,588) 
  

Assets

  –    –    –     121    174    195     –    –    –  
  

 

    (672)   (753)   (1,169)    (1,003)   (523)   (740)    (1,583)   (1,135)   (1,588) 
  

 

 
 

LOGO

        NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15127


Financial Statements

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

– analysis of items in the primary statementscontinued

  

22. Pensions and other post-retirement benefitscontinued

 

  

Amounts recognised in the income statement and statement of other comprehensive income

 

     UK pensions   US pensions   US other post-retirement benefits
     2015    2014    2013      2015    2014    2013      2015    2014    2013   
     £m    £m    £m      £m    £m    £m      £m    £m    £m   
  

 

  Included within operating costs           
  Administration costs 6    6    6     7    5    4     1    1    2   
  

 

  Included within payroll costs           
  Defined contribution scheme costs 26    19    16     22    21    23     –    –    –   
  Defined benefit scheme costs:           
      Current service cost 70    96    90     77    85    87     39    44    43   
      Past service costs – augmentations 7    15    2     –    –    –     –    –    –   
      Past service cost/(credit) – redundancies 1    (19)   (7)    –    –    –     –    –    –   
      Past service (credit)/cost – plan amendments –    (11)   –     1    –    –     –    –    –   
      Special termination benefit cost – redundancies 20    39    20     –    –    –     –    –    –   
      LIPA MSA transition –    –    –     –    (16)   –     –    (198)   –   
      Net loss on disposal of businesses –    –    –     –    –    3     –    –    1   
  

 

   124    139    121     100    90    113     39    (154)   44   
  

 

  Included within finance income and costs           
  Net interest cost 27    47    31     25    27    34     49    54    70   
  

 

  Total included in income statement 157    192    158     132    122    151     89    (99)   116   
  

 

  

Remeasurements of net retirement benefit obligations

 (46)   354    (560)    (408)   81    (35)    (317)   50    (119)  
  Exchange adjustments –    –    –     (88)   60    (37)    (148)   126    (75)  
  

 

  

Total included in the statement of other comprehensive income

 (46)   354    (560)    (496)   141    (72)    (465)   176    (194)  
  

 

 

 

Reconciliation of the net defined benefit liability

 

   UK pensions US pensions US other post-retirement benefits
 2015    2014     2013     2015     2014     2013     2015     2014     2013     
 £m    £m     £m     £m     £m     £m     £m     £m     £m     
  

 

  Opening net defined benefit liability (753)   (1,169)   (668)    (523)   (740)   (766)    (1,135)   (1,588)   (1,504)  
  (Cost)/credit recognised in the income statement (131)   (173)   (142)    (110)   (101)   (128)    (89)   99    (116)  
  

Remeasurement effects recognised in the statement of other comprehensive income

 (46)   354    (560)    (496)   141    (72)    (465)   176    (194)  
  Employer contributions 258    235    201     126    174    224     124    187    262   
  Other movements –    –    –     –    3    2     (18)   (9)   (36)  
  

 

  Closing net defined benefit liability (672)   (753)   (1,169)    (1,003)   (523)   (740)    (1,583)   (1,135)   (1,588)  
  

 

 
 

       128


  

22. Pensions and other post-retirement benefitscontinued

 

  

 
      UK pensions     US pensions     US other post-retirement benefits 
      

2015

£m

  

2014

£m

  

2013

£m

     

2015

£m

  

2014

£m

  

2013

£m

     

2015

£m

  

2014

£m

  

2013

£m

 
   
  

Changes in the present value of defined benefit obligations (including unfunded obligations)

              
  

Opening defined benefit obligations

   (18,162  (18,561  (16,775    (4,752  (5,115  (4,611    (2,680  (3,020  (2,630
  

Current service cost

   (70  (96  (90    (77  (85  (87    (39  (44  (43
  

Interest cost

   (762  (780  (788    (235  (221  (232    (130  (123  (133
  

Actuarial gains/(losses) – experience

   100    16    74      (22  (22  1      85    47    60  
  

Actuarial losses – demographic assumptions

   (95            (125  (129  5      (122  (154  (18
  

Actuarial (losses)/gains – financial assumptions

   (1,980  436    (1,765    (486  57    (245    (280  49    (218
  

Past service (cost)/credit – redundancies

   (1  19    7          16    36          119    5  
  

Special termination benefit cost – redundancies

   (20  (39  (20                            
  

Past service cost – augmentations

   (7  (15  (2                            
  

Past service credit – plan amendments

       11          (1                19      
  

Medicare subsidy received

                               (19  (17  (19
  

Liabilities extinguished on settlements

                                   60      
  

Employee contributions

   (2  (2  (3                            
  

Benefits paid

   874    849    801      269    291    269      125    117    123  
  

Exchange adjustments

                 (626  456    (251    (352  267    (147
   
  

Closing defined benefit obligations

   (20,125  (18,162  (18,561    (6,055  (4,752  (5,115    (3,412  (2,680  (3,020
   
  

Changes in the fair value of plan assets

              
  

Opening fair value of plan assets

   17,409    17,392    16,107      4,229    4,378    3,850      1,620    1,515    1,192  
  

Interest income

   735    733    757      210    194    198      81    69    63  
  

Return on assets greater/(less)than assumed

   1,929    (98  1,131      225    175    204          108    57  
  

Administration costs

   (6  (6  (6    (7  (5  (4    (1  (1  (2
  

Employer contributions

   258    235    201      126    174    224      124    187    262  
  

Employee contributions

   2    2    3                              
  

Benefits paid

   (874  (849  (801    (269  (291  (269    (125  (117  (123
  

Assets distributed in settlements and transfers

                         (39            (6
  

Exchange adjustments

                 538    (396  214      204    (141  72  
   
  

Closing fair value of plan assets

   19,453    17,409    17,392      5,052    4,229    4,378      1,903    1,620    1,515  
   
  

Actual return on plan assets

   2,664    635    1,888      435    369    402      81    177    120  
   
  

Expected contributions to plans in the following year

   225    182    181      204    118    183      104    109    196  
   
 
 
 
 
 
 

LOGO

        NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15129


     Financial Statements

   Notes to the consolidated financial statements

   – analysis of items in the primary statementscontinued

  

23. Provisions

 

  

  

We make provisions when an obligation exists, resulting from a past event and it is probable that cash will be paid to settle it, but the exact amount of cash required can only be estimated.

 

   

  

The main estimates relate to environmental remediation and decommissioning costs for various sites we own or have owned and other provisions, including restructuring plans and lease contracts we have entered into that are now loss making.

 

   

  

Our strategy in action

  

  

We are committed to the protection and enhancement of the environment. However, we have acquired, owned and operated a number of businesses which have, during the course of their operations, created an environmental impact. Therefore we have a provision that reflects the expected cost to remediate these sites. Current operations will seldom result in new sites with significant expected costs being added to the provision.

 

     

  

 

Provisions are recognised where a legal or constructive obligation exists at the reporting date, as a result of a past event, where the amount of the obligation can be reliably estimated and where the outflow of economic benefit is probable.

 

   

  

Provision is made for decommissioning and environmental costs, based on future estimated expenditures, discounted to present values. An initial estimate of decommissioning and environmental costs attributable to property, plant and equipment is recorded as part of the original cost of the related property, plant and equipment.

 

    

  

Changes in the provision arising from revised estimates or discount rates or changes in the expected timing of expenditures that relate to property, plant and equipment are recorded as adjustments to their carrying value and depreciated prospectively over their remaining estimated useful economic lives; otherwise such changes are recognised in the income statement.

 

    

  

The unwinding of the discount is included within the income statement as a financing charge.

 

  

      Environmental 
£m 
  Decommissioning 
£m 
  Restructuring 
£m 
  Emissions 
£m 
  Other 
£m 
  Total  
provisions  
£m  
 
  

 

 
  At 1 April 2013   1,198    81    53    8    420    1,760  
  Exchange adjustments   (79  (7      (1  (25  (112
  Additions   11    84    86    7    42    230  
  Unused amounts reversed   (14      (1      (3  (18
  Unwinding of discount   57                16    73  
  Utilised   (101  (14  (59      (114  (288
  

 

 
  At 31 March 2014   1,072    144    79    14    336    1,645  
  Exchange adjustments   95    8        2    28    133  
  Additions   25    7    9    7    57    105  
  Unused amounts reversed   (5      (2      (5  (12
  Unwinding of discount   57    3    1        12    73  
  Utilised   (80  (25  (48      (56  (209
  

 

 
  At 31 March 2015   1,164    137    39    23    372    1,735  
  

 

 
         
                  

2015 

£m 

  

2014  

£m  

 
  

 

 
  Current       235    282  
  Non-current       1,500    1,363  
  

 

 
         1,735    1,645  
  

 

 

     130


   23. Provisionscontinued    
  

 

Environmental provision

  

  
  

The environmental provision represents the estimated restoration and remediation costs relating to a number of sites owned and managed by subsidiary undertakings, together with certain US sites that National Grid no longer owns. The environmental provision is as follows:

 

    

  
      2015   2014   
      

Discounted

£m

   

Undiscounted

£m

   

Real

discount

rate

   

Discounted

£m

   

Undiscounted

£m

   

Real
discount

rate

   
  

 

   
  

UK sites

   286     367     2%     286     367     2%    
  

US sites

   878     999     2%     786     891     2%    
  

 

   
     1,164     1,366       1,072     1,258      
  

 

   
 

 

The remediation expenditure in the UK relates to old gas manufacturing sites and also to electricity transmission sites. Cash flows are expected to be incurred between 2015 and 2060. A number of estimation uncertainties affect the calculation of the provision, including the impact of regulation, accuracy of the site surveys, unexpected contaminants, transportation costs, the impact of alternative technologies and changes in the discount rate. This provision incorporates our best estimate of the financial effect of these uncertainties, but future changes in any of the assumptions could materially impact the calculation of the provision. The undiscounted amount is the undiscounted best estimate of the liability having regard to these uncertainties.

 

       

 

The remediation expenditure in the US is expected to be incurred between 2015 and 2071. The uncertainties regarding the calculation of this provision are similar to those considered in respect of UK sites. This expenditure is expected to be largely recoverable from ratepayers under the terms of various rate agreements in the US.

 

    

 Decommissioning provision  
 

The decommissioning provision represents £51m (2014: £55m) of expenditure relating to asset retirement obligations expected to be incurred until 2075, and £64m (2014: £72m) of expenditure relating to the demolition of gas holders expected to be incurred until 2022. It also includes the net present value of the estimated expenditure (discounted at a real rate of 2%) expected to be incurred until 2033 in respect of the decommissioning of certain US nuclear generating units that National Grid no longer owns.

 

      

 Restructuring provision  
 

The restructuring provision principally relates to business reorganisation costs in the UK and is expected to be incurred until 2023.

 

   

 Emissions provision  
 

The provision for emission costs is expected to be settled using emission allowances granted.

 

  

 Other provisions
 

Included within other provisions at 31 March 2015 are amounts provided in respect of onerous lease commitments and rates payable on surplus properties of £117m (2014: £117m) with expenditure expected to be incurred until 2039.

 

 Other provisions also include £182m (2014: £160m) of estimated liabilities in respect of past events insured by insurance subsidiary undertakings, including employer liability claims. In accordance with insurance industry practice, these estimates are based on experience from previous years and there is, therefore, no identifiable payment date. It also includes £13m (2014: £13m) in respect of obligations associated with investments in joint ventures.

LOGO

 NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16 Financial Statements131


     Financial Statements

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

– analysis of items in the primary statements continued

20. Trade and other payablescontinued

 

Trade and other payables include amounts owed to suppliers, tax authorities and other parties which are due to be settled within 12 months. The total also includes deferred income, which represents monies received from customers but for which we have not yet delivered the associated service. These amounts are recognised as revenue when the service is provided.

Trade payables are initially recognised at fair value and subsequently measured at amortised cost.

 

   

24. Share capital

 

 
  

Ordinary share capital represents the total number of shares issued which are publicly traded. We also disclose the number of treasury shares the Company holds, which are shares that the Company has bought itself, predominantly to satisfy employee share option plan liabilities.

 

    

  

 

Share capital is accounted for as an equity instrument. An equity instrument is any contract that includes a residual interest in the consolidated assets of the Company after deducting all its liabilities and is recorded at the proceeds received, net of direct issue costs, with an amount equal to the nominal amount of the shares issued included in the share capital account and the balance recorded in the share premium account.

     

      Allotted, called up
and fully paid
 
      million   £m 
  

 

 
  

At 1 April 2013

   3,795     433  
  

Issued during the year in lieu of dividends1

   59     6  
  

 

 
  

At 31 March 2014

   3,854     439  
  

Issued during the year in lieu of dividends1

   38     4  
  

 

 
  

At 31 March 2015

   3,892     443  
  

 

 
 

 

1. The issue of shares under the scrip dividend programme is considered to be a bonus issue under the terms of the Companies Act 2006 and the nominal value of the shares is charged to the share premium account.

 

     

 

The share capital of the Company consists of ordinary shares of 11 1743 pence nominal value each including ADSs. The ordinary shares and ADSs allow holders to receive dividends and vote at general meetings of the Company. The Company holds treasury shares but may not exercise any rights over these shares including the entitlement to vote or receive dividends. There are no restrictions on the transfer or sale of ordinary shares.

 

     

 

In line with the provisions of the Companies Act 2006, the Company has amended its Articles of Association and ceased to have authorised share capital.

 

   

 Treasury shares  
 

At 31 March 2015, the Company held 153m (2014: 124m) of its own shares. The market value of these shares as at 31 March 2015 was £1,323m (2014: £1,019m).

 

   

 

The Company made the following transactions in respect of its own shares during the year ended 31 March 2015:

 

  

 

1. During the year, the Company, as part of management of the dilutive effect of share issuances under the scrip dividend programme, repurchased 37m ordinary shares for aggregate consideration of £338m, including transaction costs. The shares repurchased have a nominal value of £4m and represented approximately 1% of the ordinary shares in issue as at 31 March 2015.

 

      

 

2. During the year, 3m (2014: 2m) treasury shares were gifted to National Grid Employee Share Trusts and 5m (2014: 3m) treasury shares were re-issued in relation to employee share schemes, in total representing approximately 0.2% (2014: 0.1%) of the ordinary shares in issue as at 31 March 2015. The nominal value of these shares was £1m (2014: £1m) and the total proceeds received were £23m (2014: £14m).

 

       

 

3. During the year, the Company made payments totalling £7m (2014: £3m) to National Grid Employee Share Trusts, outside of its share repurchase programme, to enable the trustees to make purchases of National Grid plc shares in order to satisfy the requirements of employee share option and reward plans.

 

      

 The maximum number of shares held during the year was 153m ordinary shares (2014: 129m) representing approximately 3.9% (2014: 3.4%) of the ordinary shares in issue as at 31 March 2015 and having a nominal value of £17m (2014: £15m).   
   

2016

£m

   2015 
£m 
 

 

 

Trade payables

   2,038     2,050   

Deferred income

   275     236   

Commodity contract liabilities

   96     116   

Social security and other taxes

   159     196   

Other payables

   717     694   

 

 
       3,285         3,292   

 

 

Due to their short maturities, the fair value of trade payables approximates their book value. Commodity contract liabilities are recorded at fair value. All other trade and other payables are recorded at amortised cost.

21. Other non-current liabilities

 

Other non-current liabilities include deferred income which will not be recognised as income until after 31 March 2017. It also includes payables that are not due until after that date.

Commodity contract liabilities are recorded at fair value. All other non-current liabilities are recorded at amortised cost.

   

2016

£m

   

2015 

£m 

 

 

 

Deferred income

   1,802     1,648   

Commodity contract liabilities

   39     55   

Other payables

   230     216   

 

 
       2,071         1,919   

 

 

There is no material difference between the fair value and the carrying value of other non-current liabilities.

22. Pensions and other post-retirement benefits

Substantially all our employees are members of either DB (defined benefit) or DC (defined contribution) pension plans. The principal UK plans are the National Grid UK Pension Scheme, the National Grid Electricity Group of the Electricity Supply Pension Scheme and the National Grid YouPlan. In the US, we have a number of plans and also provide healthcare and life insurance benefits to eligible retired US employees.

The fair value of associated plan assets and present value of DB obligations are updated annually in accordance with IAS 19 (revised). For further details and the actuarial assumptions used to value the obligations, see note 29.

We separately present our UK and US pension plans to show geographical split. Below we provide a more detailed analysis of the amounts recorded in the primary financial statements.

For DC pension plans, National Grid pays contributions into separate funds on behalf of the employee and has no further obligations to employees. The risks associated with this type of plan are assumed by the member.

For DB pension plans, members receive benefits on retirement, the value of which is dependent on factors such as salary and length of pensionable service. National Grid underwrites both financial and demographic risks associated with this type of plan.

The cost of providing benefits in a DB plan is determined using the projected unit method, with actuarial valuations being carried out at each reporting date by a qualified actuary. This valuation method is an accrued benefits valuation method that makes allowance for projected earnings.

 

132National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements 


 

   Financial Statements

22. Pensions and other post-retirement benefitscontinued

National Grid’s obligation in respect of DB pension plans is calculated separately for each plan by projecting the estimated amount of future benefit payments that employees have earned for their pensionable service in the current and prior periods. These future benefit payments are discounted to determine the present value of the liabilities and the fair value of plan assets and any unrecognised past service cost is then deducted. The discount rate used is the yield at the valuation date on high-quality corporate bonds.

National Grid takes advice from independent actuaries relating to the appropriateness of any key assumptions applied which include life expectancy of members, expected salary and pension increases, and inflation. It should be noted that comparatively small changes in the assumptions used may have a significant effect on the amounts recognised in the income statement and the statement of other comprehensive income and the net liability recognised in the statement of financial position.

Remeasurements of net retirement obligations are recognised in full in the period in which they occur in the statement of other comprehensive income.

Risks

The DB pension obligations and other post-retirement benefit liabilities are exposed to the primary risks outlined below.

Liabilities are calculated using discount rates set with reference to yields on high-quality corporate bonds prevailing in the US and UK debt markets and will fluctuate as yields change. Plan funds are invested in a variety of asset classes, principally: equities, government securities, corporate bonds and property. Consequently, actual returns will differ from the underlying discount rate adopted and therefore have an impact on the net balance sheet liability.

Changes in inflation will affect both current and future pension payments and are partially mitigated through investment in inflation matching assets and hedging instruments.

Longevity is also a key driver of liabilities and changes in expected mortality will have a direct impact on liabilities. The liabilities are, in aggregate, relatively mature which serves to mitigate this risk to some extent.

Each plan’s investment strategy seeks to balance the level of investment return sought with the aim of reducing volatility and risk. In undertaking this approach reference is made both to the maturity of the liabilities and the funding level of that plan. A number of further strategies are employed to manage underlying risks, including liability matching asset strategies, diversification of asset portfolios, interest rate hedging and management of foreign exchange exposure.

Amounts recognised in the statement of financial position

   

2016

£m

  

2015

£m

  

2014 

£m 

 

 

 

Present value of funded obligations

   (28,648  (29,292  (25,346)  

Fair value of plan assets

   26,434    26,408    23,258   

 

 
   (2,214  (2,884  (2,088)  

Present value of unfunded obligations

   (304  (300  (248)  

Other post-employment liabilities

   (67  (74  (75)  

 

 

Net defined benefit liability

   (2,585  (3,258  (2,411)  

 

 

Represented by:

    

Liabilities

   (2,995  (3,379  (2,585)  

Assets

   410    121    174   

 

 
   (2,585  (3,258  (2,411)  

 

 

The geographical split of pensions and other post-retirement benefits is as shown below:

   UK pensions   US pensions       US other post-retirement benefits  
   

2016

£m

  

2015

£m

  

2014 

£m 

   

2016

£m

  

2015

£m

  

2014 

£m 

   

2016

£m

  

2015

£m

  

2014 

£m 

 

 

 

Present value of funded obligations1

       (19,341  (20,053  (18,100)         (5,916  (5,827  (4,566)     (3,391  (3,412  (2,680)  

Fair value of plan assets

   19,401    19,453    17,409      5,136    5,052    4,229      1,897    1,903    1,620   

 

 
   60    (600  (691)     (780  (775  (337)     (1,494  (1,509  (1,060)  

Present value of unfunded obligations

   (75  (72  (62)     (229  (228  (186)             –   

Other post-employment liabilities

           –              –      (67  (74  (75)  

 

 

Net defined benefit liability

   (15  (672  (753)     (1,009  (1,003  (523)     (1,561  (1,583  (1,135)  

 

 

Represented by:

            

Liabilities

   (300  (672  (753)     (1,134  (1,124  (697)     (1,561  (1,583  (1,135)  

Assets

   285        –      125    121    174              –   

 

 
   (15  (672  (753)     (1,009  (1,003  (523)     (1,561  (1,583  (1,135)  

 

 

1. Present value of funded obligations split approximately as follows:
  ●UK pensions at 31 March 2016: 12% active members (2015: 12%; 2014: 12%); 18% deferred members (2015: 18%; 2014: 19%); 70% pensioner members (2015: 70%; 2014: 69%)
  ●US pensions at 31 March 2016: 39% active members (2015: 38%; 2014: 38%); 9% deferred members (2015: 9%; 2014: 9%); 52% pensioner members (2015: 53%; 2014: 53%)
 ●US other post-retirement benefits at 31 March 2016: 41% active members (2015: 38%; 2014: 44%); 0% deferred members (2015: 0%; 2014: 0%); 59% pensioner members (2015: 62%; 2014: 56%)

These figures reflect legal and actuarial advice that we have taken regarding recognition of surplus under IFRIC 14.

 

   

25. Other equity reserves

 

 
  

Other equity reserves are different categories of equity as required by accounting standards and represent the impact of a number of our historical transactions.

 

   

  

 

Other equity reserves comprise the translation reserve (see accounting policy B in note 1), cash flow hedge reserve (see note 15), available-for-sale reserve (see note 13), the capital redemption reserve and the merger reserve. The merger reserve arose as a result of the application of merger accounting principles under the then prevailing UK GAAP, which under IFRS 1 was retained for mergers that occurred prior to the IFRS transition date. Under merger accounting principles, the difference between the carrying amount of the capital structure of the acquiring vehicle and that of the acquired business was treated as a merger difference and included within reserves.

 

       

  

As the amounts included in other equity reserves are not attributable to any of the other classes of equity presented, they have been disclosed as a separate classification of equity.

 

   

      Translation
£m
  Cash flow
hedge
£m
  Available-
for-sale
£m
  Capital
redemption
£m
   Merger
£m
  Total
£m
 
  

 

 
  

At 1 April 2012

   346    (100  65    19     (5,165  (4,835
  

Exchange adjustments

   117                     117  
  

Net (losses)/gains taken to equity

       (31  20             (11
  

Transferred to/(from) profit or loss

       73    (10           63  
  

Tax

       (13  (2           (15
  

 

 
  

At 31 March 2013

   463    (71  73    19     (5,165  (4,681
  

Exchange adjustments

   (158                   (158
  

Net gains taken to equity

       63    6             69  
  

Transferred to/(from) profit or loss

       27    (14           13  
  

Tax

       (5  3             (2
  

 

 
  

At 31 March 2014

   305    14    68    19     (5,165  (4,759
  

Exchange adjustments

   174                     174  
  

Net (losses)/gains taken to equity

       (154  41             (113
  

Transferred to/(from) profit or loss

       13    (8           5  
  

Tax

       18    (7           11  
  

 

 
  

At 31 March 2015

   479    (109  94    19     (5,165  (4,682
  

 

 
 
 

The merger reserve represents the difference between the carrying value of subsidiary undertaking investments and their respective capital structures following the Lattice demerger from BG Group plc and the 1999 Lattice refinancing.

 

   

 The cash flow hedge reserve on interest rate swap contracts will be continuously transferred to the income statement until the borrowings are repaid. The amount due to be released from reserves to the income statement next year is £15m (pre-tax) and the remainder released with the same maturity profile as borrowings due after more than one year.    

LOGO

 NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16 Financial Statements133


Notes to the consolidated financial statements

– analysis of items in the primary statements continued

22. Pensions and other post-retirement benefitscontinued

Amounts recognised in the income statement and statement of other comprehensive income

                     

2016

£m

  

2015

£m

  2014 
£m 
 

 

 

Included within operating costs

          

Administration costs

         16    14    12   

 

 

Included within payroll costs

          

Defined contribution scheme costs

         56    48    40   

Defined benefit scheme costs:

          

Current service cost

         221    186    225   

Past service costs – augmentations

         3    7    15   

Past service (credit)/cost – redundancies

         (1  1    (19)  

Past service cost/(credit) – plan amendments

             1    (11)  

Special termination benefit cost – redundancies

         11    20    39   

LIPA MSA transition

                 (214)  

 

 
         290    263    75   

 

 

Included within finance income and costs

          

Net interest cost

         112    101    128   

 

 

Included within exceptional items and remeasurements

          

Administration costs

         2        –   

 

 

Total included in income statement

         420    378    215   

 

 

Remeasurements of net retirement benefit obligations

         539    (771  485   

Exchange adjustments

         (81  (236  186   

 

 

Total included in the statement of other comprehensive income

         458    (1,007  671   

 

 

 

The geographical split of pensions and other post-retirement benefits is as shown below:

 

  

   UK pensions  US pensions      US other post-retirement benefits  
           2016
£m
  

2015

£m

  2014 
£m 
          2016
£m
  

2015

£m

  2014 
£m 
  2016
£m
  2015
£m
  2014 
£m 
 

 

 

Included within operating costs

          

Administration costs

   9    6        6    7        1    1      

 

 

Included within payroll costs

          

Defined contribution scheme costs

   31    26    19     25    22    21             –   

Defined benefit scheme costs:

          

Current service cost

   74    70    96     95    77    85     52    39    44   

Past service costs – augmentations

   3    7    15             –             –   

Past service (credit)/cost – redundancies

   (1  1    (19)            –             –   

Past service (credit)/cost – plan amendments

           (11)        1    –             –   

Special termination benefit cost – redundancies

   11    20    39             –             –   

LIPA MSA transition

           –             (16)            (198)  

 

 
   118    124    139     120    100    90     52    39    (154)  

 

 

Included within finance income and costs

          

Net interest cost

   18    27    47     36    25    27     58    49    54   

 

 

Included within exceptional items and remeasurements

          

Administration costs

   2        –             –             –   

 

 

Total included in income statement

   147        157        192     162    132        122         111    89    (99)  

 

 

Remeasurements of net retirement benefit obligations

   534    (46  354     (67  (408  81     72    (317  50   

Exchange adjustments

           –     (33  (88  60     (48  (148  126   

 

 

Total included in the statement of other comprehensive income

   534    (46  354     (100      (496  141     24    (465  176   

 

 

134National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements


 

Financial Statements

 

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

– analysis of items in the primary statementscontinued

 

    

    

   

26. Net debt

 

 
  

 

Net debt represents the amount of borrowings and overdrafts less cash, financial investments and related derivatives.

 

  

  

 

Funding and liquidity risk management is carried out by the treasury function under policies and guidelines approved by the Finance Committee of the Board. The Finance Committee is responsible for the regular review and monitoring of treasury activity and for the approval of specific transactions, the authority for which fall outside the delegation of authority to management.

 

    

  

The primary objective of the treasury function is to manage our funding and liquidity requirements. A secondary objective is to manage the associated financial risks, in the form of interest rate risk and foreign exchange risk, to within pre-authorised parameters. Details of the main risks arising from our financing and commodity hedging activities can be found in the risk factors discussion starting on page 173 and in note 30 to the consolidated financial statements on pages 141 to 148.

 

     

  

Investment of surplus funds, usually in short-term fixed deposits or placements with money market funds that invest in highly liquid instruments of high credit quality, is subject to our counterparty risk management policy.

 

   

  

The movement in cash and cash equivalents is reconciled to movements in net debt.

 

  

  

(a) Reconciliation of net cash flow to movement in net debt

 

  

      

2015

£m

  

2014

£m

  

2013

£m

 
  

 

 
  

(Decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents

   (247  (283  335  
  

(Decrease)/increase in financial investments

   (1,157  (1,720  2,992  
  

Increase/(decrease) in borrowings and related derivatives

   682    1,021    (4,304
  

Net interest paid on the components of net debt1

   925    841    756  
  

 

 
  

Change in debt resulting from cash flows

   203    (141  (221
  

Changes in fair value of financial assets and liabilities and exchange movements

   (1,777  1,360    (536
  

Net interest charge on the components of net debt1

   (1,068  (1,053  (1,017
  

Extinguishment of debt resulting from LIPA MSA transition (note 4)

       98      
  

Other non-cash movements

   (83  (25  (58
  

 

 
  

Movement in net debt (net of related derivative financial instruments) in the year

   (2,725  239    (1,832
  

Net debt (net of related derivative financial instruments) at start of year

   (21,190  (21,429  (19,597
  

 

 
  

Net debt (net of related derivative financial instruments) at end of year

   (23,915  (21,190  (21,429
  

 

 
 
 Composition of net debt
 

Net debt is made up as follows:

 

  

   

2015

£m

 

2014

£m

 

2013

£m

 
  

 

 
  

Cash, cash equivalents and financial investments

   2,678    3,953    6,102  
  

Borrowings and bank overdrafts

   (25,910  (25,950  (28,095
  

Derivatives

   (683  807    564  
  

 

 
     (23,915  (21,190  (21,429
  

 

 
 

1. An exceptional charge of £131m (2014: £nil; 2013: £nil) is included in net interest charge on the components of net debt and an exceptional cash outflow of £152m (2014: £nil; 2013: £nil) is included in net interest paid on the components of net debt.

     

    

22. Pensions and other post-retirement benefitscontinued

Reconciliation of the net defined benefit liability

                    

2016

£m

  

2015

£m

  

2014 

£m 

 

 

 

Opening net defined benefit liability

        (3,258      (2,411      (3,497)  

Cost recognised in the income statement

        (364  (330  (175)  

Remeasurement effects recognised in the statement of other comprehensive income

  

     458    (1,007  671   

Employer contributions

        587    508    596   

Other movements

        (8  (18  (6)  

 

 

Closing net defined benefit liability

        (2,585  (3,258  (2,411)  

 

 

 

The geographical split of pensions and other post-retirement benefits is as shown below:

 

  

  UK pensions  US pensions  US other post-retirement benefits  
  

2016

£m

  2015
£m
  

2014 

£m 

  

2016

£m

  

2015

£m

  2014 
£m 
  

2016

£m

  

2015

£m

  

2014 

£m 

 

 

 

Opening net defined benefit liability

          (672      (753      (1,169)            (1,003      (523      (740)    (1,583  (1,135  (1,588)  

(Cost)/credit recognised in the income statement

  (116  (131  (173)    (137  (110  (101)    (111  (89  99   

Remeasurement effects recognised in the statement of other comprehensive income

  534    (46    354     (100  (496  141     24    (465  176   

Employer contributions

  239    258    235     231    126    174     117    124    187   

Other movements

          –                 (8  (18  (9)  

 

 

Closing net defined benefit liability

  (15  (672  (753)    (1,009  (1,003  (523)            (1,561  (1,583  (1,135)  

 

 

 

       134


   

26. Net debtcontinued

 

 
  

(b) Analysis of changes in net debt

 

  

      

Cash

and cash
equivalents
£m

  Bank
overdrafts
£m
  Net cash
and cash
equivalents
£m
  Financial
investments
£m
  Borrowings
£m
  Derivatives
£m
  

Total1  

£m  

 
  

 

 
  

At 1 April 2012

   332    (33  299    2,391    (22,992  705    (19,597
  

Cash flow

   325    10    335    2,963    (3,433  (86  (221
  

Fair value gains and losses and exchange movements

   14        14    47    (452  (145  (536
  

Interest income/(charges)

               30    (1,137  90    (1,017
  

Other non-cash movements

                   (58      (58
  

 

 
  

At 31 March 2013

   671    (23  648    5,431    (28,072  564    (21,429
  

Cash flow

   (291  8    (283  (1,755  2,009    (112  (141
  

Fair value gains and losses and exchange movements

   (26      (26  (113  1,223    276    1,360  
  

Interest income/(charges)

               36    (1,168  79    (1,053
  

Extinguishment of debt resulting from LIPA MSA transition (note 4)

                   98        98  
  

Other non-cash movements

                   (25      (25
  

 

 
  

At 31 March 2014

   354    (15  339    3,599    (25,935  807    (21,190
  

Cash flow

   (259  12    (247  (1,194  1,721    (77  203  
  

Fair value gains and losses and exchange movements

   24        24    118    (451  (1,468  (1,777
  

Interest income/(charges)2

               36    (1,160  56    (1,068
  

Other non-cash movements

                   (82  (1  (83
  

 

 
  

At 31 March 2015

   119    (3  116    2,559    (25,907  (683  (23,915
  

 

 
  

Balances at 31 March 2015 comprise:

        
  

Non-current assets

                       1,539    1,539  
  

Current assets

   119        119    2,559        177    2,855  
  

Current liabilities

       (3  (3      (3,025  (635  (3,663
  

Non-current liabilities

                   (22,882  (1,764  (24,646
  

 

 
     119    (3  116    2,559    (25,907  (683  (23,915
  

 

 
 

1. Includes accrued interest at 31 March 2015 of £230m (2014: £239m; 2013: £250m).

    

 

2. An exceptional expense of £131m (2014: £nil; 2013: £nil) is included in net interest charge on the components of net debt and an exceptional cash outflow of £152m (2014: £nil; 2013: £nil) is included in net interest paid on the components of net debt.

     

LOGO

 NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16 Financial Statements135


Notes to the consolidated financial statements

– analysis of items in the primary statements continued

22. Pensions and other post-retirement benefitscontinued

Changes in the present value of defined benefit obligations (including unfunded obligations)

                     

2016

£m

  

2015

£m

  

2014 

£m 

 

 

 

Opening defined benefit obligations

         (29,592  (25,594  (26,696)  

Current service cost

         (221  (186  (225)  

Interest cost

         (1,026  (1,127  (1,124)  

Actuarial gains – experience

         659    163    41   

Actuarial losses – demographic assumptions

             (342  (283)  

Actuarial gains/(losses) – financial assumptions

         218    (2,746  542   

Past service credit/(cost) – redundancies

         1    (1  154   

Special termination benefit cost – redundancies

         (11  (20  (39)  

Past service cost – augmentations

         (3  (7  (15)  

Past service (cost)/credit – plan amendments

             (1  30   

Medicare subsidy received

         (15  (19  (17)  

Liabilities extinguished on settlements

                 60   

Employee contributions

         (2  (2  (2)  

Benefits paid

         1,348    1,268    1,257   

Exchange adjustments

         (308  (978  723   

 

 

Closing defined benefit obligations

         (28,952  (29,592  (25,594)  

 

 

 

The geographical split of pensions and other post-retirement benefits is as shown below:

 

  

   UK pensions  US pensions  US other post-retirement benefits 
   

2016

£m

  

2015

£m

  

2014 

£m 

  

2016

£m

  

2015

£m

  

2014 

£m 

  

2016

£m

  

2015

£m

  

2014 

£m 

 

 

 

Opening defined benefit obligations

       (20,125      (18,162      (18,561)        (6,055      (4,752      (5,115)        (3,412      (2,680      (3,020)  

Current service cost

   (74  (70  (96)    (95  (77  (85)    (52  (39  (44)  

Interest cost

   (649  (762  (780)    (242  (235  (221)    (135  (130  (123)  

Actuarial gains/(losses) – experience

   552    100    16     15    (22  (22)    92    85    47   

Actuarial losses – demographic assumptions

       (95  –         (125  (129)        (122  (154)  

Actuarial (losses)/gains – financial assumptions

       (1,980  436     120    (486  57     98    (280  49   

Past service credit/(cost) – redundancies

   1    (1  19             16             119   

Special termination benefit cost – redundancies

   (11  (20  (39)            –             –   

Past service cost – augmentations

   (3  (7  (15)            –             –   

Past service credit/(cost) – plan amendments

           11         (1  –             19   

Medicare subsidy received

           –             –     (15  (19  (17)  

Liabilities extinguished on settlements

           –             –             60   

Employee contributions

   (2  (2  (2)            –             –   

Benefits paid

   895    874    849     310    269    291     143    125    117   

Exchange adjustments

           –     (198  (626  456     (110  (352  267   

 

 

Closing defined benefit obligations

   (19 ,416  (20,125  (18,162)    (6,145  (6,055  (4,752)    (3,391  (3,412  (2,680)  

 

 

136National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements


 

Financial Statements

 

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

– supplementary information

 

    

    

   

This section includes information that is important to enable a full understanding of our financial position, particularly
areas of potential risk that could affect us in the future.

 

 
  

We also include specific disclosures for British Transco Finance Inc., Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation and National Grid Gas plc in accordance with various rules including Rule 3-10 of Regulation S-X (a US SEC requirement), as they have issued public debt securities which have been guaranteed by National Grid plc and one of its subsidiary companies, National Grid Gas plc. Additional disclosures have also been included in respect of the two guarantor companies. These disclosures are in lieu of publishing separate financial statements for these companies. See note 34 for further information.

 

      

  

27. Commitments and contingencies

 

  

  

Commitments are those amounts that we are contractually required to pay in the future as long as the other party meets its obligations. These commitments primarily relate to operating lease rentals, energy purchase agreements and contracts for the repurchase of network assets which, in many cases, extend over a long period of time. We also disclose any contingencies, which include guarantees that companies have given, where we pledge assets against current obligations that will remain for a specific period.

 

      

      
      

2015

£m

   

2014

£m

 
  

 

 
  Future capital expenditure    
  

Contracted for but not provided

   2,360     2,624  
  

 

 
  Operating lease commitments    
  

Less than 1 year

   87     84  
  

In 1 to 2 years

   81     76  
  

In 2 to 3 years

   74     70  
  

In 3 to 4 years

   63     66  
  

In 4 to 5 years

   45     56  
  

More than 5 years

   277     278  
  

 

 
     627     630  
  

 

 
  Energy purchase commitments1    
  

Less than 1 year

   1,199     1,103  
  

In 1 to 2 years

   601     481  
  

In 2 to 3 years

   458     356  
  

In 3 to 4 years

   360     279  
  

In 4 to 5 years

   305     235  
  

More than 5 years

   1,415     1,083  
  

 

 
     4,338     3,537  
  

 

 
  Guarantees and letters of credit    
  

Guarantee of sublease for US property (expires 2040)

   236     232  
  

Guarantees of certain obligations of Grain LNG Import Terminal (expire up to 2028)

   151     155  
  

Guarantee of certain obligations for construction of HVDC West Coast Link (expected expiry 2016)

   555     594  
  

Other guarantees and letters of credit (various expiry dates)

   355     271  
  

 

 
     1,297     1,252  
  

 

 
 

 

1. Energy purchase commitments relate to contractual commitments to purchase electricity or gas that are used to satisfy physical delivery requirements to our customers or for energy that we use ourselves (i.e. normal purchase, sale or usage) and hence are accounted for as ordinary purchase contracts. Details of commodity contracts that do not meet the normal purchase, sale or usage criteria, and hence are accounted for as derivative contracts, are shown in note 30(e).

 

      

 

The total of future minimum sublease payments expected to be received under non-cancellable subleases is £26m (2014: £21m).

 

  

 Through the ordinary course of our operations, we are party to various litigation, claims and investigations. We do not expect the ultimate resolution of any of these proceedings to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flows or financial position.    

    

22. Pensions and other post-retirement benefitscontinued

Changes in the fair value of plan assets

                       

2016

£m

  

2015

£m

  

2014 

£m 

 

 

 

Opening fair value of plan assets

           26,408    23,258    23,285   

Interest income

           914    1,026    996   

Return on assets (less)/greater than assumed

           (338  2,154    185   

Administration costs

           (18  (14  (12)  

Employer contributions

           587    508    596   

Employee contributions

           2    2      

Benefits paid

           (1,348  (1,268  (1,257)  

Exchange adjustments

           227    742    (537)  

 

 

Closing fair value of plan assets

           26,434    26,408    23,258   

 

 

Actual return on plan assets

           576    3,180    1,181   

 

 

Expected contributions to plans in the following year

           686    533    409   

 

 

 

The geographical split of pensions and other post-retirement benefits is as shown below:

 

  

                       UK pensions                                        US pensions                        US other post-retirement benefits     
   

2016

£m

  

2015

£m

  

2014 

£m 

   

2016

£m

  

2015

£m

  

2014 

£m 

   

2016

£m

  

2015

£m

  

2014 

£m 

 

 

 

Opening fair value of plan assets

   19,453    17,409    17,392      5,052    4,229    4,378      1,903    1,620    1,515   

Interest income

   631    735    733      206    210    194      77    81    69   

Return on assets (less)/greater than assumed

   (18  1,929    (98)     (202  225    175      (118      108   

Administration costs

   (11  (6  (6)     (6  (7  (5)     (1  (1  (1)  

Employer contributions

   239    258    235      231    126    174      117    124    187   

Employee contributions

   2    2                 –              –   

Benefits paid

   (895  (874  (849)     (310  (269  (291)     (143  (125  (117)  

Exchange adjustments

           –      165    538    (396)     62    204    (141)  

 

 

Closing fair value of plan assets

       19,401        19,453        17,409          5,136        5,052        4,229          1,897        1,903        1,620   

 

 

Actual return on plan assets

   613    2,664    635      4    435    369      (41  81    177   

 

 

Expected contributions to plans in the following year

   228    225    182      220    204    118      238    104    109   

 

 

 

       136


    

28. Related party transactions

 

 
   

A related party is a company or individual who has an interest in us, for example a company that provides a service to us with a director who holds a controlling stake in that company and who is also a Director of National Grid plc. The related parties identified include joint ventures, associates, investments and key management personnel.

    

   

 

The following significant transactions with related parties were in the normal course of business. Amounts receivable from and payable to related parties are due on normal commercial terms:

 

   

       

2015

£m

   

2014

£m

   

2013

£m

 
   

 

 
   

Sales: Goods and services supplied to a pension plan and joint ventures

   52     15     10  
   

Purchases: Goods and services received from joint ventures and associates1

   120     128     133  
   

 

Receivable from a pension plan and joint ventures

   4                             3                             3  
   

Payable to joint ventures and associates

   6     5     6  
   

 

Dividends received from joint ventures and associates2

   79     38     21  
   

 

 
 

 

1. During the year the Company received goods and services from a number of joint ventures and associates, including Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P. of £24m (2014: £30m; 2013: £37m), Millennium Pipeline Company, LLC of £26m (2014: £31m; 2013: £35m) for the transportation of gas in the US and NGET/SPT Upgrades Limited of £68m (2014: £67m; 2013: £52m) for the construction of a transmission link in the UK.

      

 

2. Dividends were received from BritNed Development Limited of £49m (2014: £17m; 2013: £nil), Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P. of £14m (2014: £11m; 2013: £12m) and Millennium Pipeline Company, LLC of £16m (2014: £10m; 2013: £9m).

 

     

 

Details of investments in principal subsidiary undertakings, joint ventures and associates are disclosed in note 32 and information relating to pension fund arrangements is disclosed in notes 22 and 29. For details of Directors’ and key management remuneration, refer to the audited section of the Remuneration Report and note 3(c).

 

    

 

29. Actuarial information on pensions and other post-retirement benefits

 

  

 

Further details of the DB plans terms and the actuarial assumptions used to value the obligations are set out in this note.

 

  

 

When deciding on these assumptions we take independent actuarial advice. Comparatively small changes in the assumptions applied may have a significant effect on the overall deficit or surplus of a DB plan.

 

   

 

 

UK pension plans

  

 

National Grid’s defined benefit pension arrangements are funded with assets held in separate trustee administered funds. The arrangements are managed by trustee companies with boards consisting of company and member appointed directors. The directors are required to manage the arrangements in accordance with local regulations and the arrangements’ governing documents, acting on behalf of their beneficiaries.

 

     

 

The arrangements are subject to independent actuarial funding valuations at least every three years and following consultation and agreement with us, the qualified actuary certifies the employers’ contribution, which, together with the specified contributions payable by the employees and proceeds from the plans’ assets, are expected to be sufficient to fund the benefits payable. The last full actuarial valuations were carried out as at 31 March 2013. The next valuations are required to be carried out as at 31 March 2016.

 

      

 

The results of the 2013 valuations are shown below:

 

  

   NG UKPS1 NGEG of ESPS2 
   

 

 
   

Latest full actuarial valuation

   31 March 2013     31 March 2013  
   

Actuary

   Towers Watson     Aon Hewitt 
   

Market value of scheme assets at latest valuation

   £15,569m     £1,900m  
   

Actuarial value of benefits due to members

   £(17,332)m     £(2,708)m  
   

Market value as percentage of benefits

   90%     70%  
   

Funding deficit

   £1,763m     £808m  
   

Funding deficit (net of tax)

   £1,410m     £646m  
   

 

 
 

 

1. National Grid UK Pension Scheme

    

 

2. National Grid Electricity Group of the Electricity Supply Pension Scheme.

    

 

 

From April 2014 an annual cap was placed on future increases to the salary used to calculate pensions at the lower of 3% or the annual increase in RPI. This capped salary applied to all pensionable service from 1 April 2013 onwards. During the year ended 31 March 2014 these changes resulted in a past service credit of £11m to the income statement (see note 22) and a change to the salary increase assumption which affects how our DB liabilities as at 31 March have been calculated. These changes are to ensure our schemes remain affordable and sustainable over the coming years.

      

LOGO

 NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16 Financial Statements137


Notes to the consolidated financial statements

– analysis of items in the primary statements continued

23. Provisions

We make provisions when an obligation exists, resulting from a past event and it is probable that cash will be paid to settle it, but the exact amount of cash required can only be estimated.

The main estimates relate to environmental remediation and decommissioning costs for various sites we own or have owned and other provisions, including restructuring plans and lease contracts we have entered into that are now loss making. The evaluation of the likelihood of the contingent events has required best judgement by management regarding the probability of exposure to potential loss. Should circumstances change following unforeseeable developments, the likelihood could alter.

Our strategy in action

We are committed to the protection and enhancement of the environment. However, we have acquired, owned and operated a number of businesses which have, during the course of their operations, created an environmental impact. Therefore we have a provision that reflects the expected cost to remediate these sites. Current operations will seldom result in new sites with significant expected costs being added to the provision.

Provisions are recognised where a legal or constructive obligation exists at the reporting date, as a result of a past event, where the amount of the obligation can be reliably estimated and where the outflow of economic benefit is probable.

Provision is made for decommissioning and environmental costs, based on future estimated expenditures, discounted to present values. An initial estimate of decommissioning and environmental costs attributable to property, plant and equipment is recorded as part of the original cost of the related property, plant and equipment.

Changes in the provision arising from revised estimates or discount rates or changes in the expected timing of expenditures that relate to property, plant and equipment are recorded as adjustments to their carrying value and depreciated prospectively over their remaining estimated useful economic lives; otherwise such changes are recognised in the income statement.

The unwinding of the discount is included within the income statement as a financing charge.

   Environmental
£m
  Decommissioning
£m
    Restructuring
£m
        Emissions
£m
  

          Other

£m

  Total 
      provisions 
£m 
 

 

 

At 1 April 2014

   1,072   144   79    14    336    1,645   

Exchange adjustments

   95   8       2    28    133   

Additions

   25   7   9    7    57    105   

Unused amounts reversed

   (5    (2      (5  (12)  

Unwinding of discount

   57   3   1        12    73   

Utilised

   (80 (25)   (48      (56  (209)  

 

 

At 31 March 2015

   1,164   137   39    23    372    1,735   

Exchange adjustments

   29   3       1    9    42   

Additions

   30   22   10    1    33    96   

Unused amounts reversed

   (15 (8)   (1      (3  (27)  

Unwinding of discount

   58   4   1        10    73   

Utilised

   (97 (17)   (19  (7  (60  (200)  

 

 

At 31 March 2016

   1,169   141   30    18    361    1,719   

 

 
                    
               

2016

£m

  

2015 

£m 

 

 

 

Current

        236    235   

Non-current

        1,483    1,500   

 

 
        1,719    1,735   

 

 

138National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements


 

Financial Statements

 

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

– supplementary informationcontinued

 

    

    

23. Provisionscontinued

Environmental provision

The environmental provision represents the estimated restoration and remediation costs relating to a number of sites owned and managed by subsidiary undertakings, together with certain US sites that National Grid no longer owns. The environmental provision is as follows:

                                2016                                                           2015                             
   Discounted
£m
   Undiscounted
£m
   Real 
discount 
rate 
  Discounted
£m
   Undiscounted
£m
   Real 
discount 
rate 
 

 

 

UK sites

   280     348     2%     286     367     2%   

US sites

   889     1,031     2%     878     999     2%   

 

 
   1,169     1,379      1,164     1,366    

 

 

The remediation expenditure in the UK relates to old gas manufacturing sites and also to electricity transmission sites. Cash flows are expected to be incurred between 2016 and 2060. A number of estimation uncertainties affect the calculation of the provision, including the impact of regulation, accuracy of the site surveys, unexpected contaminants, transportation costs, the impact of alternative technologies and changes in the discount rate. This provision incorporates our best estimate of the financial effect of these uncertainties, but future changes in any of the assumptions could materially impact the calculation of the provision. The undiscounted amount is the undiscounted best estimate of the liability having regard to these uncertainties.

The remediation expenditure in the US is expected to be incurred between 2016 and 2071. The uncertainties regarding the calculation of this provision are similar to those considered in respect of UK sites. This expenditure is expected to be largely recoverable from ratepayers under the terms of various rate agreements in the US.

Decommissioning provision

The decommissioning provision represents £66m (2015: £51m) of expenditure relating to asset retirement obligations estimated to be incurred until 2095, and £37m (2015: £64m) of expenditure relating to the demolition of gas holders estimated to be incurred until 2020. It also includes the net present value of the estimated expenditure (discounted at a real rate of 2%) expected to be incurred until 2033 in respect of the decommissioning of certain US nuclear generating units that National Grid no longer owns.

Restructuring provision

The restructuring provision principally relates to business reorganisation costs in the UK and is expected to be incurred until 2023.

Emissions provision

The provision for emission costs is expected to be settled using emission allowances granted.

Other provisions

Included within other provisions at 31 March 2016 are amounts provided in respect of onerous lease commitments and rates payable on surplus properties of £100m (2015: £117m) with expenditure expected to be incurred until 2039.

Other provisions also include £190m (2015: £182m) of estimated liabilities in respect of past events insured by insurance subsidiary undertakings, including employer liability claims. In accordance with insurance industry practice, these estimates are based on experience from previous years and there is, therefore, no identifiable payment date. Other provisions also include £13m (2015: £13m) in respect of obligations associated with investments in joint ventures.

 

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements139


Notes to the consolidated financial statements

– analysis of items in the primary statements continued

24. Share capital

Ordinary share capital represents the total number of shares issued which are publicly traded. We also disclose the number of treasury shares the Company holds, which are shares that the Company has bought itself, predominantly to satisfy the scrip dividend programme and employee share option plan liabilities.

Share capital is accounted for as an equity instrument. An equity instrument is any contract that includes a residual interest in the consolidated assets of the Company after deducting all its liabilities and is recorded at the proceeds received, net of direct issue costs, with an amount equal to the nominal amount of the shares issued included in the share capital account and the balance recorded in the share premium account.

        Allotted, called up     
     and fully paid     
 
   million   £m  

 

 

At 1 April 2014

   3,854     439   

Issued during the year in lieu of dividends1

   38       

 

 

At 31 March 2015

   3,892     443   

Issued during the year in lieu of dividends1

   32       

 

 

At 31 March 2016

   3,924     447   

 

 

1.The issue of shares under the scrip dividend programme is considered to be a bonus issue under the terms of the Companies Act 2006 and the nominal value of the shares is charged to the share premium account.

The share capital of the Company consists of ordinary shares of 11 1743 pence nominal value each including ADSs. The ordinary shares and ADSs allow holders to receive dividends and vote at general meetings 43 of the Company. The Company holds treasury shares but may not exercise any rights over these shares including the entitlement to vote or receive dividends. There are no restrictions on the transfer or sale of ordinary shares.

In line with the provisions of the Companies Act 2006, the Company has amended its Articles of Association and ceased to have authorised share capital.

Treasury shares

At 31 March 2016, the Company held 179m (2015: 153m) of its own shares. The market value of these shares as at 31 March 2016 was £1,767m (2015: £1,323m).

The Company made the following transactions in respect of its own shares during the year ended 31 March 2016:

1.During the year, the Company, as part of management of the dilutive effect of share issuances under the scrip dividend programme, repurchased 31m (2015: 37m) ordinary shares for aggregate consideration of £267m (2015: £338m), including transaction costs.

The shares repurchased have a nominal value of £4m (2015: £4m) and represented approximately 1% (2015: 1%) of the ordinary shares in issue as at 31 March 2016.

2.During the year, 2m (2015: 3m) treasury shares were gifted to National Grid Employee Share Trusts and 3m (2015: 5m) treasury shares were re-issued in relation to employee share schemes, in total representing approximately 0.1% (2015: 0.2%) of the ordinary shares in issue as at 31 March 2016. The nominal value of these shares was £1m (2015: £1m) and the total proceeds received were £16m (2015: £23m).

3.During the year the Company made payments totalling £6m (2015: £7m) to National Grid Employee Share Trusts, outside of its share repurchase programme, to enable the trustees to make purchases of National Grid plc shares in order to satisfy the requirements of employee share option and reward plans.

The maximum number of shares held during the year was 179m ordinary shares (2015: 153m) representing approximately 4.6% (2015: 3.9%) of the ordinary shares in issue as at 31 March 2016 and having a nominal value of £20m (2015: £17m).

140National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements


 

29. Actuarial information   Financial Statements

25. Other equity reserves

Other equity reserves are different categories of equity as required by accounting standards and represent the impact of a number of our historical transactions.

Other equity reserves comprise the translation reserve (see accounting policy C in note 1), cash flow hedge reserve (see note 15), available-for-sale reserve (see note 13), the capital redemption reserve and the merger reserve. The merger reserve arose as a result of the application of merger accounting principles under the then prevailing UK GAAP, which under IFRS 1 was retained for mergers that occurred prior to the IFRS transition date. Under merger accounting principles, the difference between the carrying amount of the capital structure of the acquiring vehicle and that of the acquired business was treated as a merger difference and included within reserves.

As the amounts included in other equity reserves are not attributable to any of the other classes of equity presented, they have been disclosed as a separate classification of equity.

    Translation
£m
  Cash flow
hedge
£m
  Available-
for-sale
£m
  Capital
redemption
£m
       Merger
£m
          Total
£m
 

At 1 April 2013

   463    (71  73    19     (5,165  (4,681

Exchange adjustments

   (158                   (158

Net gains taken to equity

       63    6             69  

Transferred to/(from) profit or loss

       27    (14           13  

Tax

       (5  3             (2

At 31 March 2014

   305    14    68    19     (5,165  (4,759

Exchange adjustments

   174                     174  

Net (losses)/gains taken to equity

       (154  41             (113

Transferred to/(from) profit or loss

       13    (8           5  

Tax

       18    (7           11  

At 31 March 2015

   479    (109  94    19     (5,165  (4,682

Exchange adjustments

   69                     69  

Net gains taken to equity

       50    43             93  

Transferred to profit or loss

       29                 29  

Tax

       (15  (17           (32

At 31 March 2016

   548    (45  120    19     (5,165  (4,523

The merger reserve represents the difference between the carrying value of subsidiary undertaking investments and their respective capital structures following the Lattice demerger from BG Group plc and the 1999 Lattice refinancing.

The cash flow hedge reserve will be continuously transferred to the income statement until the borrowings are repaid. The amount due to be released from reserves to the income statement next year is £21m (pre-tax) and the remainder released with the same maturity profile as borrowings due after more than one year.

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements141


Notes to the consolidated financial statements

– analysis of items in the primary statements continued

26. Net debt

Net debt represents the amount of borrowings and overdrafts less cash, financial investments and related derivatives.

Funding and liquidity risk management is carried out by the treasury function under policies and guidelines approved by the Finance Committee of the Board. The Finance Committee is responsible for the regular review and monitoring of treasury activity and for the approval of specific transactions, the authority for which fall outside the delegation of authority to management.

The primary objective of the treasury function is to manage our funding and liquidity requirements. A secondary objective is to manage the associated financial risks, in the form of interest rate risk and foreign exchange risk, to within pre-authorised parameters. Details of the main risks arising from our financing and commodity hedging activities can be found in the risk factors discussion starting on page 183 and in note 30 to the consolidated financial statements on pages 149 to 155.

Investment of surplus funds, usually in short-term fixed deposits or placements with money market funds that invest in highly liquid instruments of high credit quality, is subject to our counterparty risk management policy.

The movement in cash and cash equivalents is reconciled to movements in net debt.

(a) Reconciliation of net cash flow to movement in net debt

    

2016

£m

  

2015

£m

  

2014

£m

 

Increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

   4    (247  (283

Increase/(decrease) in financial investments

   391    (1,157  (1,720

(Increase)/decrease in borrowings and related derivatives

   (1,100  682    1,021  

Net interest paid on the components of net debt1

   810    925    841  

Change in debt resulting from cash flows

   105    203    (141

Changes in fair value of financial assets and liabilities and exchange movements

   (515  (1,777  1,360  

Net interest charge on the components of net debt1

   (913  (1,068  (1,053

Extinguishment of debt resulting from LIPA MSA transition (note 4)

           98  

Other non-cash movements

   (87  (83  (25

Movement in net debt (net of related derivative financial instruments) in the year

   (1,410  (2,725  239  

Net debt (net of related derivative financial instruments) at start of year

   (23,915  (21,190  (21,429

Net debt (net of related derivative financial instruments) at end of year

   (25,325  (23,915  (21,190

 

Composition of net debt

Net debt is made up as follows:

 

    
    

2016

£m

  

2015

£m

  

2014

£m

 

Cash, cash equivalents and financial investments

   3,125    2,678    3,953  

Borrowings and bank overdrafts

   (28,344  (25,910  (25,950

Derivatives

   (106  (683  807  
    (25,325  (23,915  (21,190

1.An exceptional charge of £nil (2015: £131m; 2014: £nil) is included in net interest charge on pensionsthe components of net debt and an exceptional cash outflow of £nil (2015: £152m; 2014: £nil) is included in net interest paid on the components of net debt.

142National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements


   Financial Statements

26. Net debtcontinued

(b) Analysis of changes in net debt

    

 
 
 

Cash

and cash
equivalents
£m

  

  
  
  

  
 
 
Bank
overdrafts
£m
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
Net cash
and cash
equivalents
£m
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
Financial
investments
£m
  
  
  
  
 
Borrowings
£m
  
  
  
 
Derivatives
£m
  
  
  

 

Total

£m

1 

  

At 1 April 2013

   671    (23  648    5,431    (28,072  564        (21,429

Cash flow

   (291  8    (283  (1,755  2,009    (112  (141

Fair value gains and losses and exchange movements

   (26      (26  (113  1,223    276    1,360  

Interest income/(charges)

               36    (1,168  79    (1,053

Extinguishment of debt resulting from LIPA MSA transition (note 4)

                   98        98  

Other non-cash movements

                   (25      (25

At 31 March 2014

   354    (15  339    3,599    (25,935  807    (21,190

Cash flow

   (259  12    (247  (1,194  1,721    (77  203  

Fair value gains and losses and exchange movements

   24        24    118    (451  (1,468  (1,777

Interest income/(charges)2

               36    (1,160  56    (1,068

Other non-cash movements

                   (82  (1  (83

At 31 March 2015

   119    (3  116    2,559    (25,907  (683  (23,915

Cash flow

   4        4    368    (631  364    105  

Fair value gains and losses and exchange movements

   4        4    49    (739  171    (515

Interest income/(charges)2

               22    (978  43    (913

Other non-cash movements

                   (86  (1  (87

At 31 March 2016

   127    (3  124    2,998    (28,341  (106  (25,325

Balances at 31 March 2016 comprise:

        

Non-current assets

                       1,685    1,685  

Current assets

   127        127    2,998        278    3,403  

Current liabilities

       (3  (3      (3,608  (337  (3,948

Non-current liabilities

                   (24,733  (1,732  (26,465
    127    (3  124    2,998    (28,341  (106  (25,325

1.Includes accrued interest at 31 March 2016 of £243m (2015: £230m; 2014: £239m).
2.An exceptional expense of £nil (2015: £131m; 2014: £nil) is included in net interest charge on the components of net debt and an exceptional cash outflow of £nil (2015: £152m; 2014: £nil) is included in net interest paid on the components of net debt.

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements143


Notes to the consolidated financial statements

– supplementary information

This section includes information that is important to enable a full understanding of our financial position, particularly areas of potential risk that could affect us in the future.

We also include specific disclosures for British Transco Finance Inc., Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation and National Grid Gas plc in accordance with various rules including Rule 3-10 of Regulation S-X (a US SEC requirement), as they have issued public debt securities which have been guaranteed by National Grid plc and one of its subsidiary companies, National Grid Gas plc. Additional disclosures have also been included in respect of the two guarantor companies. These disclosures are in lieu of publishing separate financial statements for these companies. See note 34 for further information.

27. Commitments and contingencies

Commitments are those amounts that we are contractually required to pay in the future as long as the other post-retirement benefitsparty meets its obligations. These commitments primarily relate to operating lease rentals, energy purchase agreements and contracts for the repurchase of network assets which, in many cases, extend over a long period of time. We also disclose any contingencies, which include guarantees that companies have given, where we pledge assets against current obligations that will remain for a specific period.

    

        2016

£m

   

2015

£m

 

Future capital expenditure

    

Contracted for but not provided

   2,616     2,360  

Operating lease commitments

    

Less than 1 year

   92     87  

In 1 to 2 years

   86     81  

In 2 to 3 years

   72     74  

In 3 to 4 years

   54     63  

In 4 to 5 years

   52     45  

More than 5 years

   286     277  
    642     627  

Energy purchase commitments1

    

Less than 1 year

   1,096     1,199  

In 1 to 2 years

   598     601  

In 2 to 3 years

   454     458  

In 3 to 4 years

   362     360  

In 4 to 5 years

   315     305  

More than 5 years

   1,477     1,415  
    4,302     4,338  

Guarantees and letters of credit

    

Guarantee of sublease for US property (expires 2040)

   219     236  

Guarantees of certain obligations of Grain LNG Import Terminal (expire up to 2028)

   113     151  

Guarantees of certain obligations for construction of HVDC West Coast Link (expected expiry 2016)

   415     555  

Guarantees of certain obligations of Nemo Link Limited (various expiry dates)

   166       

Guarantees of certain obligations of National Grid North Sea Link Limited (various expiry dates)

   1,038       

Other guarantees and letters of credit (various expiry dates)

   440     355  
    2,391     1,297  

1.Energy purchase commitments relate to contractual commitments to purchase electricity or gas that are used to satisfy physical delivery requirements to our customers or for energy that we use ourselves (i.e. normal purchase, sale or usage) and hence are accounted for as ordinary purchase contracts. Details of commodity contracts that do not meet the normal purchase, sale or usage criteria, and hence are accounted for as derivative contracts, are shown in note 30(e).

The total of future minimum sublease payments expected to be received under non-cancellable subleases is £21m (2015: £26m).

Through the ordinary course of our operations, we are party to various litigation, claims and investigations. We do not expect the ultimate resolution of any of these proceedings to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flows or financial position.

144National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements


continued   Financial Statements

 

28. Related party transactions

Related parties include joint ventures, associates, investments and key management personnel.

The following significant transactions with related parties were in the normal course of business. Amounts receivable from and payable to related parties are due on normal commercial terms:

          2016
£m
         2015
£m
         2014
£m
 

Sales: Goods and services supplied to a pension plan and joint ventures

   16     52     15  

Purchases: Goods and services received from joint ventures and associates1

   266     120     128  

Receivable from a pension plan and joint ventures

   7     4     3  

Payable to joint ventures and associates2

   103     6     5  

Dividends received from joint ventures and associates3

   72     79     38  

1.During the year the Company received goods and services from a number of joint ventures and associates, including Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P. of £8m (2015: £24m; 2014: £30m), Millennium Pipeline Company, LLC of £29m (2015: £26m; 2014: £31m) for the transportation of gas in the US; Algonquin Gas Transmission LLC of £43m (2015: £nil; 2014: £nil) for pipeline services in the US; and NGET/SPT Upgrades Limited of £167m (2015: £68m; 2014: £67m) for the construction of a transmission link in the UK.
2.Included in amounts payable to joint ventures and associates is £87m (2015: £nil; 2014: £nil) in respect of deposits received for National Grid property sites from St William Homes LLP.
3.Dividends were received from BritNed Development Limited of £48m (2015: £49m; 2014: £17m), Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P. of £7m (2015: £14m; 2014: £11m) and Millennium Pipeline Company, LLC of £17m (2015: £16m; 2014: £10m).

Details of investments in principal subsidiary undertakings, joint ventures and associates are disclosed in note 32 and information relating to pension fund arrangements is disclosed in notes 22 and 29. For details of Directors’ and key management remuneration, refer to the audited section of the Remuneration Report and note 3(c).

29. Actuarial information on pensions and other post-retirement benefits

Further details of the DB pension plans terms and the actuarial assumptions used to value the obligations are set out in this note.

When deciding on these assumptions we take independent actuarial advice. Comparatively small changes in the assumptions applied may have a significant effect on the overall deficit or surplus of a DB pension plan.

UK pension plans

National Grid’s defined benefit pension arrangements are funded with assets held in separate trustee administered funds. The arrangements are managed by trustee companies with boards consisting of company and member appointed directors. The directors are required to manage the arrangements in accordance with local regulations and the arrangements’ governing documents, acting on behalf of their beneficiaries.

The arrangements are subject to independent actuarial funding valuations at least every three years and following consultation and agreement with us, the qualified actuary certifies the employers’ contribution, which, together with the specified contributions payable by the employees and proceeds from the plans’ assets, are expected to be sufficient to fund the benefits payable. The last full actuarial valuations were carried out as at 31 March 2013. The 2016 valuation processes have commenced.

The results of the 2013 valuations are shown below:

    NG UKPS1    NGEG of ESPS2 

Latest full actuarial valuation

   31 March 2013                                              31 March 2013  

Actuary

   Willis Towers Watson     Aon Hewitt  

Market value of plan assets at latest valuation

   £15,569m     £1,900m  

Actuarial value of benefits due to members

   £17,332m     £2,708m  

Market value as percentage of benefits

   90%     70%  

Funding deficit

   £1,763m     £808m  

Funding deficit (net of tax)

   £1,446m     £663m  

1.National Grid UK Pension Scheme

The 2013 actuarial funding valuation showed that, based on long-term financial assumptions, the contribution rate required to meet future benefit accrual was 36% of pensionable earnings (currently 33% by employers and 3% by employees). In addition, National Grid makes payments to the scheme to cover administration costs and the Pension Protection Fund levy.

Following the 2013 valuation, National Grid and the Trustees agreed a recovery plan which would see the funding deficit repaid by 31 March 2027. Under the schedule of contributions, payments of £60m were made in 2013/14 and £99m in 2014/15 and will thereafter rise in line with RPI until 2026/27. As part of the 2013 agreement, National Grid has established a security arrangement with a charge in favour of the Trustees. At 31 March 2015 the value of this was required to be £397m. This was provided via £300m in letters of credit and approximately £198m in UK Government bonds and cash. The assets held as security will be paid to the scheme in the event that National Grid Gas plc (NGG) is subject to an insolvency event, is given notice of less than 12 months that Ofgem intends to revoke its licence under the Gas Act 1986, or National Grid fails to make the required contributions in relation to the scheme. The assets held as security will be released back to National Grid if the scheme moves into surplus. In addition, National Grid will make a payment of £200m (increased in line with RPI) into the scheme if NGG’s credit rating by two out of three specified agencies falls below certain agreed levels for a period of 40 days.

This scheme ceased to allow new hires to join from 1 April 2002. A DC section of the scheme was offered for employees joining after this date, which has since been replaced by The National Grid YouPlan (see below).

2.National Grid Electricity Group of the Electricity Supply Pension Scheme

The 2013 actuarial funding valuation showed that, based on long-term financial assumptions, the contribution rate required to meet future benefit accrual was 33.4% of pensionable earnings (currently 27.5% by employers and an average of 5.9% by employees).

Following the 2013 valuation, National Grid and the Trustees agreed a recovery plan that would see the funding deficit repaid by 31 March 2027. Under the schedule of contributions, a payment of £80m was made in 2013/14 and £46m in 2014/15. Thereafter annual payments are due of £47m in 2015/16 rising in line with RPI until 2026/27. As part of the 2013 agreement, National Grid has established security arrangements with a charge in favour of the Trustees. At 31 March 2015 the value of this was required to be £150m. This was provided via £150m in a letter of credit. In addition, approximately £36m in UK Government bonds and cash was held. The assets held as security will be paid to the scheme in the event that National Grid Electricity Transmission plc (NGET) is subject to an insolvency event, or ceases to hold a licence granted under the Electricity Act 1989. The assets held as security will be released back to National Grid if the scheme moves into surplus. National Grid has also agreed to make a payment in respect of the deficit up to a maximum of £500m should certain triggers be breached; namely if NGET ceases to hold the licence granted under the Electricity Act 1989 or NGET’s credit rating by two out of three specified agencies falls below certain agreed levels for a period of 40 days.

The scheme closed to new members from 1 April 2006.

The National Grid YouPlan

The National Grid YouPlan (YouPlan) is a DC scheme that was launched in 2013 and under the rules of the plan, National Grid double matches contributions to YouPlan up to a maximum of 6% of employee salary. YouPlan is the qualifying scheme used for automatic enrolment and new hires are enrolled into YouPlan.

US pension plans

National Grid sponsors numerous non-contributory DB pension plans. The DB plans provide retirement benefits to vested union employees, as well as vested non-union employees hired before 1 January 2011. Benefits under these plans generally reflect age, years of service and compensation and are paid in the form of an annuity or lump sum. An independent actuary performs valuations annually. The Company funds the defined benefit plans by contributing no less than the minimum amount required, but no more than the maximum tax deductible amount allowed under US Internal Revenue Service regulations. The range of contributions based upon these regulations can vary significantly based upon the funded status of the plans. At present, there is some flexibility in the amount that is contributed on an annual basis. In general, the Company’s policy for funding the US pension plans is to contribute the amounts collected in rates and capitalised in the rate base during the year, to the extent that the funding is no less than the minimum amount required. The assets of the plans are held in trusts and administered by fiduciary committees comprised of appointed employees of the Company.

National Grid also has several DC pension plans, primarily comprised of employee savings and Company matching contributions. Non-union employees hired after 1 January 2011 as well as new hires in 10 groups of represented union employees, receive a core contribution into the DC plan, irrespective of the employee’s contribution into the plan.

US retiree healthcare and life insurance plans
National Grid provides healthcare and life insurance benefits to eligible retired US employees. Eligibility is based on certain age and length of service requirements and in most cases retirees contribute to the cost of their healthcare coverage. In the US, there is no governmental requirement to pre-fund post-retirement health and welfare plans. However, in general, the Company’s policy for funding the US retiree healthcare and life insurance plans is to contribute amounts collected in rates and capitalised in the rate base during the year.

       138


   

29. Actuarial information on pensions and other post-retirement benefitscontinued

 

    
  Asset allocations    
  

Within the asset allocations below there is significant diversification across regions, asset managers, currencies and bond categories.

 

   

  
  UK pensions    
     2015  2014  2013   
     

Quoted

£m

  

Unquoted

£m

  

Total

£m

  

Quoted

£m

  

Unquoted

£m

  

Total

£m

  

Quoted

£m

  

Unquoted

£m

  

Total

£m

   
  

 

   
  

Equities1

  3,848    761    4,609    4,045    620    4,665    4,825    546    5,371    
  

Corporate bonds2

  6,494        6,494    5,706        5,706    5,804        5,804    
  

Government securities

  4,637        4,637    4,161        4,161    4,743        4,743    
  

Property

  86    1,082    1,168    33    1,057    1,090        1,072    1,072    
  

Diversified alternatives3

      716    716        793    793                
  

Liability matching assets4,6

  878        878    598        598                
  

Other5,6

  936    15    951    433    (37  396    426    (24  402    
  

 

   
    16,879    2,574    19,453    14,976    2,433    17,409    15,798    1,594    17,392    
  

 

   
 

 

1. Included within equities at 31 March 2015 were ordinary shares of National Grid plc with a value of £14m (2014: £15m; 2013: £16m).

2. Included within corporate bonds at 31 March 2015 was an investment in a number of bonds issued by subsidiary undertakings with a value of £80m (2014: £72m; 2013: £69m).

3. Includes return seeking non-conventional asset classes.

4. Includes liability-driven investment vehicles.

5. Includes cash and cash type instruments.

6. Comparatives have been represented on a basis consistent with the current year presentation.

    

    

    

    

    

    

 

 

US pensions

  

   2015 2014 2013 
   

Quoted

£m

 

Unquoted

£m

 

Total

£m

 

Quoted

£m

 

Unquoted

£m

 

Total

£m

 

Quoted

£m

 

Unquoted

£m

 

Total

£m

 
  

 

   
  

Equities

  617    1,455    2,072    508    1,225    1,733    507    1,289    1,796    
  

Corporate bonds

  971    139    1,110    823    336    1,159    863    295    1,158    
  

Government securities

  1,059        1,059    632    28    660    707    19    726    
  

Property

      249    249        189    189        175    175    
  

Diversified alternatives1

      498    498        434    434        465    465    
  

Other

      64    64        54    54        58    58    
  

 

   
    2,647    2,405    5,052    1,963    2,266    4,229    2,077    2,301    4,378    
  

 

   
 

 

1. Includes return seeking non-conventional asset classes.

    

 

 

US other post-retirement benefits

   2015 2014 2013  
   

Quoted

£m

 

Unquoted

£m

 

Total

£m

 

Quoted

£m

 

Unquoted

£m

 

Total

£m

 

Quoted

£m

 

Unquoted

£m

 

Total

£m

  
  

 

   
  

Equities

  289    939    1,228    245    852    1,097    195    774    969    
  

Corporate bonds

  34        34    2    10    12    2    11    13    
  

Government securities

  382        382    357    1    358    361    2    363    
  

Diversified alternatives1

  47    100    147    43    110    153    43    127    170    
  

Other

      112    112                            
  

 

   
    752    1,151    1,903    647    973    1,620    601    914    1,515    
  

 

   
 

 

1. Includes return seeking non-conventional asset classes.

 

    

 Target asset allocations  
 

Each plan’s investment strategy is formulated specifically in order to manage risk, through investment in diversified asset classes, including the use of liability matching assets and where appropriate through the employment of interest rate and inflation hedging instruments. The target asset allocation of the plans as at 31 March 2015 is as follows:

 

    

    

UK pensions

%

 

US pensions

%

 

US other

post-retirement
benefits

%

  
  

 

   
  

Equities

  

  21    42    65    
  

Other

  

  79    58    35    
  

 

   
    100    100    100    
  

 

   

LOGO

NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15139


Financial Statements

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

– supplementary informationcontinued

   

29. Actuarial information on pensions and other post-retirement benefitscontinued

 

 
  Actuarial assumptions  
  

The Company has applied the following financial assumptions in assessing DB liabilities.

 

  

      UK pensions   US pensions   US other post-retirement benefits 
      2015
%
   2014
%
   2013
%
   

2015

%

   

2014

%

   

2013

%

   

2015

%

   

2014

%

   

2013

%

 
  

 

 
  

Discount rate1

   3.3     4.3     4.3     4.1     4.8     4.7     4.1     4.8     4.7  
  

Rate of increase in salaries2

   3.2     3.6     4.1     3.5     3.5     3.5     3.5     3.5     3.5  
  

Rate of increase in RPI3

   2.9     3.3     3.4     n/a     n/a     n/a     n/a     n/a     n/a  
  

Initial healthcare cost trend rate

   n/a     n/a     n/a     n/a     n/a     n/a     8.0     8.0     8.0  
  

Ultimate healthcare cost trend rate

   n/a     n/a     n/a     n/a     n/a     n/a     5.0     5.0     5.0  
  

 

 
 

 

1. The discount rates for pension liabilities have been determined by reference to appropriate yields on high-quality corporate bonds prevailing in the UK and US debt markets at the reporting date.

 

     

 

2. A promotional scale has also been used where appropriate. The UK assumption stated is that relating to service prior to 1 April 2014. The UK assumption for the rate of increase in salaries for service after this date is 2.1%.

 

     

 

3. This is the key assumption that determines assumed increases in pensions in payment and deferment in the UK only. The assumptions for the UK were 2.9% (2014: 3.3%; 2013: 3.4%) for increases in pensions in payment and 2.1% (2014: 3.3%; 2013: 3.4%) for increases in pensions in deferment.

 

For sensitivity analysis see note 33.

 

     

  

    2015 2014 2013 
    UK
years
 US
years
 UK
years
 US
years
 UK
years
 US
years
 
  

 

 
  Assumed life expectations for a retiree age 65              
  

Today:

  

            
  

Males

  

   22.7     21.7     22.9     20.6     22.7     19.5  
  

Females

  

   25.1     23.9     25.4     22.9     25.2     21.4  
  

In 20 years:

  

            
  

Males

  

   24.9     23.4     25.2     22.8     25.0     21.0  
  

Females

  

   27.4     25.6     27.8     24.7     27.6     22.2  
  

 

 
 

 

Maturity profile of DB obligations

  

 The weighted average duration of the DB obligation for each category of scheme is 16 years for UK pension schemes; 14 years for US pension schemes and 18 years for US other post-retirement benefits.   

       140


  

30. Financial risk management

 

  

  

 

Our activities expose us to a variety of financial risks including currency risk, interest rate risk, commodity price risk, credit risk, capital risk and liquidity risk. Our risk management programme focuses on the unpredictability of financial markets and seeks to minimise potential volatility of financial performance from these risks. We use financial instruments, including derivative financial instruments, to manage risks of this type.

     

  

 

This note describes our approach to managing risk, including an analysis of assets and liabilities by currency type and an analysis of interest rate category for our net debt. We are required by accounting standards to also include a number of specific disclosures (such as a maturity analysis of contractual undiscounted cash flows) and have included these requirements below.

 

    

  

 

Risk management related to financing activities is carried out by a central treasury department under policies approved by the Finance Committee of the Board. The objective of the treasury department is to manage funding and liquidity requirements, including managing associated financial risks, to within acceptable boundaries. The Finance Committee provides written principles for overall risk management, as well as written policies covering specific areas such as foreign exchange risk, interest rate risk, credit risk, liquidity risk, use of derivative financial instruments and non-derivative financial instruments, and investment of excess liquidity.

      

  

 

We have exposure to the following risks, which are described in more detail below:

 

  

   credit risk;      
   liquidity risk;      
   interest rate risk;      
   currency risk;      
   commodity risk; and      
   capital risk.      
  

 

(a) Credit risk

  

  

We are exposed to the risk of loss resulting from counterparties’ default on their commitments including failure to pay or make a delivery on a contract. This risk is inherent in our commercial business activities. We are exposed to credit risk on our cash and cash equivalents, derivative financial instruments, deposits with banks and financial institutions, as well as credit exposures to wholesale and retail customers, including outstanding receivables and committed transactions.

     

  

 

Treasury credit risk

  

  

Counterparty risk arises from the investment of surplus funds and from the use of derivative financial instruments. As at 31 March 2015, the following limits were in place for investments held with banks and financial institutions:

 

   

        

Maximum limit

£m

     

Long-term limit   

£m   

 
  

 

 
 

Triple ‘A’ G8 sovereign entities (AAA)

 Unlimited   Unlimited    
 

Triple ‘A’ vehicles (AAA)

 319   270    
 

Triple ‘A’ range institutions and non G8 sovereign entities (AAA)

 1,088 to 1,642   548 to 859    
 

Double ‘A+’ G8 sovereign entities (AA+)

 1,642   859    
 

Double ‘A’ range institutions (AA)

 650 to 818   331 to 409    
 

Single ‘A’ range institutions (A)

 224 to 319   114 to 163    
  

 

 
 

 

As at 31 March 2014 and 2015, we had a number of exposures to individual counterparties. In accordance with our treasury policies, counterparty credit exposure utilisations are monitored daily against the counterparty credit limits. Counterparty credit ratings and market conditions are reviewed continually with limits being revised and utilisation adjusted, if appropriate. Management does not expect any significant losses from non performance by these counterparties.

     

 

 

Commodity credit risk

The credit policy for commodity transactions is owned and monitored by the Executive Energy Risk Committee, under authority delegated by the Board and Executive Committee, and establishes controls and procedures to determine, monitor and minimise the credit risk of counterparties.

  

    

 

 

Wholesale and retail credit risk

Our principal commercial exposure in the UK is governed by the credit rules within the regulated codes: Uniform Network Code and Connection and Use of System Code. These set out the level of credit relative to the RAV for each credit rating. In the US, we are required to supply electricity and gas under state regulations. Our credit policies and practices are designed to limit credit exposure by collecting security deposits prior to providing utility services, or after utility service has commenced if certain applicable regulatory requirements are met. Collection activities are managed on a daily basis. Sales to retail customers are usually settled in cash, cheques, electronic bank payments or by using major credit cards. We are committed to measuring, monitoring, minimising and recording counterparty credit risk in our wholesale business. The utilisation of credit limits is regularly monitored and collateral is collected against these accounts when necessary. Management does not expect any significant losses of receivables that have not been provided for as shown in note 17.

 

  

          

LOGO

          NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15141


Financial Statements

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

– supplementary informationcontinued

  30. Financial risk managementcontinued
 

 

(a) Credit riskcontinued

 Offsetting financial assets and liabilities
 The following tables set out our financial assets and liabilities which are subject to offset and to enforceable master netting arrangements or similar agreements. The tables show the amounts which are offset and reported net in the statement of financial position. Amounts which cannot be offset under IFRS, but which could be settled net under terms of master netting agreements if certain conditions arise, and with collateral received or pledged, are shown to present National Grid’s net exposure.
 

 

Financial assets and liabilities on different transactions are only reported net if the transactions are with the same counterparty, a legal right of offset exists and the cash flows are intended to be settled on a net basis.

 

 

Amounts which do not meet the criteria for offsetting on the statement of financial position but could be settled net in certain circumstances principally relate to derivative transactions under ISDA agreements where each party has the option to settle amounts on a net basis in the event of default of the other party.

 

 

Commodity contracts that have not been offset on the balance sheet may be settled net in certain circumstances under ISDA or NAESB (North American Energy Standards Board) agreements.

 

 

National Grid has similar arrangements in relation to bank account balances and bank overdrafts; and trade payables and trade receivables which are subject to general terms and conditions. However, these balances are immaterial.

 

   

    

 

Related amounts available
to be offset but not offset in

statement of financial position

 

    

 At 31 March 2015 Gross  
carrying  
amounts  
£m  
 

Gross  
      amounts  
offset1

£m  

 

Net amount  
presented  
in statement  
of financial  
position  

£m  

 

Financial  
instruments  

£m  

 

Cash  

collateral  
received/  
pledged  

£m  

 Net amount   
£m   
 

 

 Assets      
 

Derivative financial instruments

 1,716  –  1,716  (839) (527) 350  
 

Commodity contracts

 64  –  64  (11) –  53  
 

 

  1,780  –  1,780  (850) (527) 403  
 

 

 Liabilities      
 

Derivative financial instruments

 (2,399) –  (2,399) 839  1,125  (435) 
 

Commodity contracts

 (182) 11  (171) 11  –  (160) 
 

 

  (2,581) 11  (2,570) 850  1,125  (595) 
 

 

       
 

 

  (801) 11  (790) –  598  (192) 
 

 

 

    

 

Related amounts available

to be offset but not offset in

statement of financial position

    

At 31 March 2014

Gross   carrying   amounts  

£m  

Gross  

amounts  

offset1

£m  

Net amount   presented  

in statement  

of financial  

position  

£m  

Financial  

instruments  

£m  

Cash  

collateral  

received/  

pledged  

£m  

Net amount   

£m   

 

 

 Assets      
 

Derivative financial instruments

 1,970  –  1,970  (609) (831) 530  
 

Commodity contracts

 89  (2) 87  (7) (2) 78  
 

 

  2,059  (2) 2,057  (616) (833) 608  
 

 

 Liabilities      
 

Derivative financial instruments

 (1,163) –  (1,163) 609  374  (180) 
 

Commodity contracts

 (123) –  (123)  –  (116) 
 

 

  (1,286) –  (1,286) 616  374  (296) 
 

 

       
 

 

  773  (2) 771  –  (459) 312  
 

 

 

1. The gross financial assets and liabilities offset in the statement of financial position primarily relate to commodity contracts. Offsets relate to margin payments for NYMEX gas  futures which are traded on a recognised exchange.

 

       142


  30. Financial risk managementcontinued
  

 

(b) Liquidity risk

  Our policy is to determine our liquidity requirements by the use of both short-term and long-term cash flow forecasts. These forecasts are supplemented by a financial headroom analysis which is used to assess funding requirements for at least a 24 month period and maintain adequate liquidity for a continuous 12 month period.
  

 

We believe our contractual obligations, including those shown in commitments and contingencies in note 27 can be met from existing cash and investments, operating cash flows and other financings that we reasonably expect to be able to secure in the future, together with the use of committed facilities if required.

  

 

Our debt agreements and banking facilities contain covenants, including those relating to the periodic and timely provision of financial information by the issuing entity and financial covenants such as restrictions on the level of subsidiary indebtedness. Failure to comply with these covenants, or to obtain waivers of those requirements, could in some cases trigger a right, at the lender’s discretion, to require repayment of some of our debt and may restrict our ability to draw upon our facilities or access the capital markets.

  

 

The following is an analysis of the contractual undiscounted cash flows payable under financial liabilities and derivative assets and liabilities as at the reporting date:

 

   At 31 March 2015  

 

Less  

than  

1 year  

£m  

  

1 to 2  

years  

£m  

  

2 to 3  

years  

£m  

  

 

More  

than  

3 years  

£m  

  

Total   

£m   

  

 

  Non-derivative financial liabilities          
  

Borrowings, excluding finance lease liabilities

  (2,289)  (1,179)  (1,513)  (20,235)  (25,216) 
  

Interest payments on borrowings1

  (790)  (790)  (766)  (13,587)  (15,933) 
  

Finance lease liabilities

  (44)  (41)  (32)  (86)  (203) 
  

Other non-interest bearing liabilities

  (2,744)  (216)  –   –   (2,960) 
 
  Derivative financial liabilities          
  

Derivative contracts – receipts

  602   244   411   1,194   2,451  
  

Derivative contracts – payments

  (935)  (318)  (952)  (1,631)  (3,836) 
  

Commodity contracts

  (116)  (43)  (21)  –   (180) 
  

 

    (6,316)  (2,343)  (2,873)  (34,345)  (45,877) 
  

 

 
   

At 31 March 2014

  

Less  

than  

1 year  

£m  

  

1 to 2  

years  

£m  

  

2 to 3  

years  

£m  

  

More  

than  

3 years  

£m  

  

Total   

£m   

  

 

  Non-derivative financial liabilities          
  

Borrowings, excluding finance lease liabilities

  (3,091)  (864)  (1,140)  (20,275)  (25,370) 
  

Interest payments on borrowings1

  (826)  (812)  (796)  (14,571)  (17,005) 
  

Finance lease liabilities

  (18)  (19)  (20)  (112)  (169) 
  

Other non-interest bearing liabilities

  (2,584)  (190)  –   –   (2,774) 
 
  Derivative financial liabilities          
  

Derivative contracts – receipts

  1,068   950   153   1,155   3,326  
  

Derivative contracts – payments

  (556)  (861)  (144)  (1,638)  (3,199) 
  

Commodity contracts

  (177)  (30)  (22)    (227) 
  

 

    (6,184)  (1,826)  (1,969)  (35,439)  (45,418) 
  

 

 

 

1. The interest on borrowings is calculated based on borrowings held at 31 March without taking account of future issues. Floating rate interest is estimated using a forward  interest rate curve as at 31 March. Payments are included on the basis of the earliest date on which the Company can be required to settle.

 

LOGO

          NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15143


Financial Statements

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

– supplementary informationcontinued

   30. Financial risk managementcontinued  
   

 

(c) Interest rate risk

  

   National Grid’s interest rate risk arises from our long-term borrowings. Borrowings issued at variable rates expose National Grid to cash flow interest rate risk, partially offset by cash held at variable rates. Borrowings issued at fixed rates expose National Grid to fair value interest rate risk.    
   

 

Our interest rate risk management policy is to seek to minimise total financing costs (being interest costs and changes in the market value of debt) subject to constraints. We do this by using fixed and floating rate debt and derivative financial instruments including interest rate swaps, swaptions and forward rate agreements.

    

   

 

We hold some borrowings on issue that are inflation linked. We believe that these provide a partial economic offset to the inflation risk associated with our UK inflation linked revenues.

   

   

 

The table in note 19 sets out the carrying amount, by contractual maturity, of borrowings that are exposed to interest rate risk before taking into account interest rate swaps.

   

   

 

During 2015 and 2014, net debt was managed using derivative instruments to hedge interest rate risk as follows:

 

  

       

 

2015

   

 

2014

 
       

Fixed  

rate  

£m  

   

Floating

rate

£m

   

Inflation  

linked  

£m  

   

Other1

£m  

   

Total  

£m  

   

Fixed  

rate  

£m  

   

Floating

rate

£m

   

Inflation  

linked  

£m  

   

Other1

£m  

   

Total   

£m   

 
   

 

 
   

Cash and cash equivalents

        118      –      –      119      175      179       –      –      354    
   

Financial investments

   281      2,273      –           2,559      615      2,979       –           3,599    
   

Borrowings2

   (16,229)     (2,746)     (6,933)     (2)     (25,910)     (15,585)     (3,520)      (6,836)     (9)     (25,950)   
   

 

 
   

Pre-derivative position

   (15,947)     (355)     (6,933)          (23,232)     (14,795)     (362)      (6,836)     (4)     (21,997)   
   

Derivative effect3

   1,593      (2,294)     18      –      (683)     3,359      (2,743)      191      –      807    
   

 

 
   

Net debt position

   (14,354)     (2,649)     (6,915)          (23,915)     (11,436)     (3,105)      (6,645)     (4)     (21,190)   
   

 

 
 

 

1. Represents financial instruments which are not directly affected by interest rate risk, such as investments in equity or other similar financial instruments.

2. Includes bank overdrafts.

3. The impact of 2015/16 (2014: 2014/15) maturing short-dated interest rate derivatives is included.

 

(d) Currency risk

National Grid operates internationally and is exposed to foreign exchange risk arising from various currency exposures, primarily with respect to the dollar. Foreign exchange risk arises from future commercial transactions, recognised assets and liabilities, and investments in foreign operations.

    

    

    

  

    

 
 

 

Our policy for managing foreign exchange transaction risk is to hedge contractually committed foreign currency cash flows over a prescribed minimum size. Where foreign currency cash flow forecasts are less certain, our policy is to hedge a proportion of such cash flows based on the probability of those cash flows occurring. Instruments used to manage foreign exchange transaction risk include foreign exchange forward contracts and foreign exchange swaps.

     

 

 

Our policy for managing foreign exchange translation risk relating to our net investment in foreign operations is to maintain a percentage of net debt and foreign exchange forwards so as to provide an economic offset of our cash flows arising in the foreign currency. The primary managed foreign exchange exposure arises from the dollar denominated assets and liabilities held by our US operations, with a further small euro exposure in respect of a joint venture investment.

     

 

 

During 2015 and 2014, derivative financial instruments were used to manage foreign currency risk as follows:

 

  

   

 

2015

 

 

2014

 
   

Sterling  

£m  

 

Euro

£m

 

Dollar  

£m  

 

Other  

£m  

 

Total  

£m  

 

Sterling  

£m  

 

Euro

£m

 

Dollar  

£m  

 

Other  

£m  

 

Total   

£m   

 
   

 

 
   

Cash and cash equivalents

   12      –      107      –      119      16      –       338      –      354    
   

Financial investments

   1,227      90      1,181      61      2,559      1,879      111       1,553      56      3,599    
   

Borrowings1

   (11,791)     (5,099)     (7,604)     (1,416)     (25,910)     (12,780)     (4,479)      (7,330)     (1,361)     (25,950)   
   

 

 
   

Pre-derivative position

   (10,552)     (5,009)     (6,316)     (1,355)     (23,232)     (10,885)     (4,368)      (5,439)     (1,305)     (21,997)   
   

Derivative effect

   1,608      5,203      (8,858)     1,364      (683)     3,137      4,670       (8,326)     1,326      807    
   

 

 
   

Net debt position

   (8,944)     194      (15,174)          (23,915)     (7,748)     302       (13,765)     21      (21,190)   
   

 

 
 

 

1. Includes bank overdrafts.

 

The overall exposure to dollars largely relates to our net investment hedge activities as described in note 15.

 

    

  

       144


  

30. Financial risk managementcontinued

 

(d) Currency riskcontinued

The currency exposure on other financial instruments is as follows:

 

  

  

  

      

 

2015

   

 

2014

 
          Sterling
£m
   Euro
£m
   Dollar
£m
   Other
£m
   Total
£m
       Sterling
£m
   Euro
£m
   Dollar
£m
   Other
£m
   

Total   

£m   

 
  

 

 
  

Trade and other receivables

   200     –      1,495          1,695     142     –      1,623          1,765    
  

Trade and other payables

   (1,403   –      (1,457        (2,860   (1,370   –      (1,291        (2,661)   
  

Other non-current assets

   (19   –      (252        (271   (16   –      (220        (236)   
  

 

 
 

 

The carrying amounts of other financial instruments are denominated in the above currencies, which in most instances are the functional currency of the respective subsidiaries. Our exposure to dollars is due to activities in our US subsidiaries. We do not have any other significant exposure to currency risk on these balances.

 

    

 

(e) Commodity risk

We purchase electricity and gas to supply our customers in the US and to meet our own energy needs. Substantially all our costs of purchasing electricity and gas for supply to customers are recoverable at an amount equal to cost. The timing of recovery of these costs can vary between financial periods leading to an under- or over-recovery within any particular year that can lead to large fluctuations in the income statement. We follow approved policies to manage price and supply risks for our commodity activities.

  

     

 
 Our energy procurement risk management policy and delegations of authority govern our US commodity trading activities for energy transactions. The purpose of this policy is to ensure we transact within pre-defined risk parameters and only in the physical and financial markets where we or our customers have a physical market requirement. In addition, state regulators require National Grid to manage commodity risk and cost volatility prudently through diversified pricing strategies. In some jurisdictions we are required to file a plan outlining our strategy to be approved by regulators. In certain cases we might receive guidance with regard to specific hedging limits.       
 
 Energy purchase contracts for the forward purchase of electricity or gas that are used to satisfy physical delivery requirements to customers or for energy that the Company uses itself meet the normal purchase, sale or usage exemption of IAS 39. They are, therefore, not recognised in the financial statements. Disclosure of commitments under such contracts is made in note 27.    
 
 

We enter into forward contracts for the purchase of commodities, some of which do not meet the own use exemption for accounting purposes and hence are accounted for as derivatives. We also enter into derivative financial instruments linked to commodity prices, including index-linked futures, swaps and options contracts. These derivative financial instruments are used to manage market price volatility and are carried at fair value on the statement of financial position, with the mark-to-market changes reflected through earnings.

 

 

      

LOGO

          NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15145


Financial Statements

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

– supplementary informationcontinued

  30. Financial risk managementcontinued  
  

 

(e) Commodity riskcontinued

The fair value of our commodity contracts by type can be analysed as follows:

 

  

  

      2015    2014 
      

 

 

 
   

        Assets

£m

 

    Liabilities

£m

 

Total

£m

  

Assets      

£m      

 

Liabilities

£m

 Total   
£m   
 
  

 

 
  

Commodity purchase contracts accounted for as derivative contracts

          
  

Forward purchases of electricity

        (42  (42   1         (49  (48)   
  

Forward purchases of gas

   42     (42       30         (66  (36)   
  

 

Derivative financial instruments linked to commodity prices

          
  

Electricity swaps

   21     (59  (38   26         (6  20    
  

Electricity options

        (1  (1   22             22    
  

Gas swaps

   1     (27  (26   7         (2  5    
  

Gas options

                 1             1    
  

 

 
     64     (171      (107   87         (123      (36)   
  

 

 
 

 

The maturity profile of commodity contracts is as follows:

 

  

   2015  2014 
      

 

 

 
   

Assets

£m

 

Liabilities

£m

 Total
£m
  

Assets      

£m      

 Liabilities
£m
 Total   
£m   
 
  

 

 
  

Current

          
  

Less than one year

   35     (116  (81   42         (77  (35)   
  

 

 
     35     (116  (81   42         (77  (35)   
  

 

 
  

Non-current

          
  

In 1 to 2 years

   25     (37  (12   13         (22  (9)   
  

In 2 to 3 years

   2     (18  (16   15         (17  (2)   
  

In 3 to 4 years

   1         1     4         (7  (3)   
  

In 4 to 5 years

   1         1     3             3    
  

More than 5 years

                 10             10    
  

 

 
     29     (55  (26   45         (46  (1)   
  

 

 
     64     (171  (107   87         (123  (36)   
  

 

 
 

 

For each class of commodity contract, our exposure based on the notional quantities is as follows:

 

  

                  

2015

   2014    
  

 

 
  

Forward purchases of electricity1

        
984 GWh
  
   1,740 GWh    
  

Forward purchases/sales of gas2

        
55m Dth
  
   84m Dth    
  

Electricity swaps

        
10,779 GWh
  
   6,603 GWh    
  

Electricity options

        
25,157 GWh
  
   28,760 GWh    
  

Gas swaps

        
65m Dth
  
   50m Dth    
  

Gas options

        
4m Dth
  
   23m Dth    
  

NYMEX gas futures3

        
20m Dth
  
   20m Dth    
  

 

 
 

 

1. Forward electricity purchases have terms up to three years. The contractual obligations under these contracts are £77m (2014: £106m).

    

 

2. Forward gas purchases have terms up to five years. The contractual obligations under these contracts are £26m (2014: £171m).

    

 

3. NYMEX gas futures have been offset with related margin accounts (see note 30(a)).

    

 

 

(f) Capital risk management

The capital structure of the Group consists of shareholders’ equity, as disclosed in the consolidated statement of changes in equity, and net debt (note 26). National Grid’s objectives when managing capital are: to safeguard our ability to continue as a going concern; to remain within regulatory constraints of our regulated operating companies; and to maintain an efficient mix of debt and equity funding thus achieving an optimal capital structure and cost of capital. We regularly review and manage the capital structure as appropriate in order to achieve these objectives.

  

      

 

 

Maintaining appropriate credit ratings for our regulated companies is an important aspect of our capital risk management strategy and balance sheet efficiency. As noted on page 22, we monitor our balance sheet efficiency using several metrics including our retained cash flow/net debt and interest cover. Interest cover for the year ended 31 March 2015 was 5.1 (2014: 4.1). Our long-term target range for interest cover is greater than 3.0, which we believe is consistent with single A range long-term senior unsecured debt credit ratings within our main UK operating companies, NGET and NGG, based on guidance from the rating agencies.

 

      

         146


   30. Financial risk managementcontinued 
  

 

(f) Capital risk managementcontinued

  

  In addition, we monitor the RAV gearing within each of NGET and the regulated transmission and distribution businesses within NGG. This is calculated as net debt expressed as a percentage of RAV, and indicates the level of debt employed to fund our UK regulated businesses. It is compared with the level of RAV gearing indicated by Ofgem as being appropriate for these businesses, at around 60 to 65%.     
  

 

The majority of our regulated operating companies in the US and the UK (and one intermediate UK holding company), are subject to certain restrictions on the payment of dividends by administrative order, contract and/or licence. The types of restrictions that a company may have that would prevent a dividend being declared or paid unless they are met include:

 

    

  

   dividends must be approved in advance by the relevant US state regulatory commission;

     

  

   the subsidiary must have at least two recognised rating agency credit ratings of at least investment grade;

     

  

   dividends must be limited to cumulative retained earnings, including pre-acquisition retained earnings;

     

  

   National Grid plc must maintain an investment grade credit rating and if that rating is the lowest investment grade

bond rating it cannot have a negative watch/review for downgrade notice by a credit rating agency;

     

  

  

   the subsidiary must not carry on any activities other than those permitted by the licences;

     

  

   the subsidiary must not create any cross-default obligations or give or receive any intra-group cross-subsidies;

and

     

  

  

   the percentage of equity compared with total capital of the subsidiary must remain above certain levels.

     

  

 

There is a further restriction relating only to the Narragansett Electric Company, which is required to maintain its consolidated net worth above certain levels.

   

  

 

These restrictions are subject to alteration in the US as and when a new rate case or rate plan is agreed with the relevant regulatory bodies for each operating company and in the UK through the normal licence review process.

   

  

 

As most of our business is regulated, at 31 March 2015 the majority of our net assets are subject to some of the restrictions noted above. These restrictions are not considered to be significantly onerous, nor do we currently expect they will prevent the planned payment of dividends in future in line with our dividend policy.

    

  

 

Some of our regulatory and bank loan agreements additionally impose lower limits for the long-term credit ratings that certain companies within the Group must hold. All the above requirements are monitored on a regular basis in order to ensure compliance. The Company has complied with all externally imposed capital requirements to which it is subject.

    

  

 

(g) Fair value analysis

  

       
  

The financial instruments included on the statement of financial position are measured at fair value. These fair values can be categorised into hierarchy levels that are representative of the inputs used in measuring the fair value. The best evidence of fair value is a quoted price in an actively traded market. In the event that the market for a financial instrument is not active, a valuation technique is used.

 

     

      2015     2014 
      Level 1
£m
   Level 2
£m
  Level 3
£m
  

Total

£m

     Level 1
£m
   

Level 2

£m

  Level 3
£m
  

Total   

£m   

 
  

 

 
  

Assets

             
  

Available-for-sale investments

   1,315     247        1,562      2,786     214        3,000    
  

Derivative financial instruments

        1,702    14    1,716           1,950    20    1,970    
  

Commodity contracts

        22    42    64           34    53    87    
  

 

 
         1,315         1,971    56        3,342          2,786     2,198    73        5,057    
  

 

 
  

Liabilities

             
  

Derivative financial instruments

        (2,219  (180  (2,399         (1,043  (120  (1,163)   
  

Commodity contracts

        (87  (84  (171         (12  (111  (123)   
  

 

 
          (2,306  (264  (2,570             (1,055      (231  (1,286)   
  

 

 
     1,315     (335      (208  772      2,786     1,143    (158  3,771    
  

 

 
 

 

Level 1:      Financial instruments with quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.

          

 

 

Level 2:      Financial instruments with quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets or quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in inactive markets and financial instruments valued using models where all significant inputs are based directly or indirectly on observable market data.

            

 

 

Level 3:      Financial instruments valued using valuation techniques where one or more significant inputs are based on unobservable market data.

 

           

LOGO

          NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15147


Financial Statements

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

– supplementary informationcontinued

  

30. Financial risk managementcontinued

 

  

  (g) Fair value analysiscontinued  
  Our level 3 derivative financial instruments include cross-currency swaps with an embedded call option, currency swaps where the currency forward curve is illiquid and inflation linked swaps where the inflation curve is illiquid. In valuing these instruments a third-party valuation is obtained to support each reported fair value.    
  

 

Our level 3 commodity contracts primarily consist of our forward purchases of electricity and gas where pricing inputs are unobservable, as well as other complex transactions. Complex transactions can introduce the need for internally developed models based on reasonable assumptions. Industry standard valuation techniques such as the Black-Scholes pricing model and Monte Carlo simulation are used for valuing such instruments. Level 3 is also applied in cases when optionality is present or where an extrapolated forward curve is considered unobservable. All published forward curves are verified to market data; if forward curves differ from market data by 5% or more they are considered unobservable.

       

  

 

The changes in value of our level 3 derivative financial instruments are as follows:

 

  

     Derivative
        financial instruments        
  Commodity contracts  Total 
     2015    2014     2015    2014      2015    2014     
     £m    £m     £m    £m      £m    £m     
  

 

 
  At 1 April  (100)    (104)     (58)    (71)      (158)    (175)    
  Net gains/(losses) for the year1,2  (63)    7      (53)    19       (116)    26     
  Purchases  –      –      38     1       38     1     
  Settlements  (3)    (3)     28     (7)      25     (10)    
  Reclassification/transfers out of level 3  –      –          –           –     
  

 

 
  

At 31 March

  (166)    (100)     (42)    (58)      (208)    (158)    
  

 

 
 

 

1. Loss of £63m (2014: £7m gain) is attributable to derivative financial instruments held at the end of the reporting period and has been recognised in finance costs in the income statement.

     

 

2. Loss of £48m (2014: £30m loss) is attributable to commodity contract financial instruments held at the end of the reporting period.

 

    

 

The impacts on a post-tax basis of reasonably possible changes in significant level 3 assumptions are as follows:

 

  

    Derivative
        financial instruments        
         Commodity contracts         
    

2015 

Income 
statement 

 

2014    

Income    
statement    

 

2015  

Income  
    statement  

 

2014    

Income    
    statement    

 
    £m  £m     £m   £m     
  

 

 
  

10% increase in commodity prices1

  

  –     –           33     
  

10% decrease in commodity prices1

  

  –     –       (3)    (15)    
  

Volume forecast uplift2

  

  –     –       (2)    (2)    
  

Volume forecast reduction2

  

  –     –           2     
  

Forward curve extrapolation

  

  –     –       –     1     
  

+10% market area price change

  

  –     –       (4)    –     
  

–10% market area price change

  

  –     –           –     
  

+20 basis point change in Limited Price Inflation (LPI) market curve3

  

  (77)    (54)      –     –     
  

–20 basis points change in LPI market curve3

  

  75     53       –     –     
  

 

 
 

 

1. Level 3 commodity price sensitivity is included within the sensitivity analysis disclosed in note 33.

    

 

2. Volumes were flexed using maximum and minimum historical averages, or by >10% where historical averages were not available.

    

 

3. A reasonably possible change in assumption of other level 3 derivative financial instruments is unlikely to result in a material change in fair values.

 

    

 The impacts disclosed above were considered on a contract by contract basis with the most significant unobservable inputs identified.   

       148


  

31. Borrowing facilities

 

  

  

 

To support our long-term liquidity requirements and provide backup to commercial paper and other borrowings, we agree loan facilities with financial institutions over and above the value of borrowings that may be required. These facilities have never been drawn, and our undrawn amounts are listed below.

 

    

  

 

At 31 March 2015, we had bilateral committed credit facilities of £2,094m (2014: £2,073m). In addition, we had committed credit facilities from syndicates of banks of £884m at 31 March 2015 (2014: £800m). All committed credit facilities were undrawn in 2015 and 2014. An analysis of the maturity of these undrawn committed facilities is shown below:

 

    

     2015     2014     
     £m     £m     
  

 

 
  Undrawn committed borrowing facilities expiring:  
  

Less than 1 year

  572      –     
  

In 1 to 2 years

  –      800     
  

In 2 to 3 years

  874      –     
  

In 3 to 4 years

  1,220      853     
  

In 4 to 5 years

  312      1,220     
  

 

 
        2,978              2,873     
  

 

 
 
 Of the unused facilities at 31 March 2015, £2,666m (2014: £2,583m) was held as backup to commercial paper and similar borrowings, while £312m (2014: £290m) is available as backup to specific US borrowings.   
 
 In addition to the above the Group has an RPI-linked bank loan agreement totalling £1,500m with the European Investment Bank (EIB), which is currently undrawn.   
 
 

Further information on our bonds can be found on the debt investor section of our website.

 

 

 

 

  

LOGO

        NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15149                                 


      Financial Statements

   NotesFrom April 2014 an annual cap was placed on future increases to the consolidated financial statementssalary used to calculate pensions at the lower of 3% or the annual increase in RPI. This capped salary applied to all pensionable service from 1 April 2013 onwards. During the year ended 31 March 2014 these changes resulted in a past service credit of £11m to the income statement (see note 22) and a change to the salary increase assumption which affects how our DB liabilities as at 31 March have been calculated. These changes are to ensure our schemes remain affordable and sustainable over the coming years.

   – supplementary informationcontinued

 

 National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements145


Notes to the consolidated financial statements

– supplementary information continued

29. Actuarial information on pensions and other post-retirement benefitscontinued

National Grid UK Pension Scheme

The 2013 actuarial funding valuation showed that, based on long-term financial assumptions, the contribution rate required to meet future benefit accrual was 36% of pensionable earnings (currently 33% by employers and 3% by employees; from 1 April 2016 this will be 31% by employers and 5% by employees). In addition, National Grid makes payments to the scheme to cover administration costs and the Pension Protection Fund levy.

Following the 2013 valuation, National Grid and the Trustees agreed a recovery plan which would see the funding deficit repaid by

31 March 2027. Under the schedule of contributions, payments of £60m were made in 2013/14, £99m in 2014/15 and £100m in 2015/16, and will thereafter rise in line with RPI until 2026/27. As part of the 2013 agreement, National Grid has established a security arrangement with a charge in favour of the Trustees. At 31 March 2016 the value of this was required to be £427m. This was provided via £427m in letters of credit. The assets held as security will be paid to the scheme in the event that National Grid Gas plc (NGG) is subject to an insolvency event, is given notice of less than 12 months that Ofgem intends to revoke its licence under the Gas Act 1986, or National Grid fails to make the required contributions in relation to the scheme. The assets held as security will be released back to National Grid if the scheme moves into surplus. In addition, National Grid will make a payment of £200m (increased in line with RPI) into the scheme if NGG’s credit rating by two out of three specified agencies falls below certain agreed levels for a period of 40 days.

This scheme ceased to allow new hires to join from 1 April 2002. A DC section of the scheme was offered for employees joining after this date, which has since been replaced by The National Grid YouPlan (YouPlan) (see below).

National Grid Electricity Group of the Electricity Supply Pension Scheme

The 2013 actuarial funding valuation showed that, based on long-term financial assumptions, the contribution rate required to meet future benefit accrual was 33.4% of pensionable earnings (currently 27.5% by employers and an average of 5.9% by employees; from 1 April 2016 this will be an average of 26.5% by employers and an average of 6.9% by employees).

Following the 2013 valuation, National Grid and the Trustees agreed a recovery plan that would see the funding deficit repaid by 31 March 2027. Under the schedule of contributions, a payment of £80m was made in 2013/14, £46m in 2014/15 and £47m in 2015/16, and will thereafter rise in line with RPI until 2026/27. As part of the 2013 agreement, National Grid has established security arrangements with a charge in favour of the Trustees. At 31 March 2016 the value of this was required to be £150m. This was provided via £150m in a letter of credit. The assets held as security will be paid to the scheme in the event that National Grid Electricity Transmission plc (NGET) is subject to an insolvency event, or ceases to hold a licence granted under the Electricity Act 1989. The assets held as security will be released back to National Grid if the scheme moves into surplus. National Grid has also agreed to make a payment in respect of the deficit up to a maximum of £500m should certain triggers be breached; namely if NGET ceases to hold the licence granted under the Electricity Act 1989 or NGET’s credit rating by two out of three specified agencies falls below certain agreed levels for a period of 40 days.

The scheme closed to new members from 1 April 2006.

The National Grid YouPlan

The YouPlan is a DC scheme that was launched in 2013 and under the rules of the plan, National Grid double matches contributions to YouPlan up to a maximum of 6% of employee salary. YouPlan is the qualifying scheme used for automatic enrolment and new hires are enrolled into YouPlan.

US pension plans

National Grid sponsors numerous non-contributory DB pension plans. The DB plans provide retirement benefits to vested union employees, as well as vested non-union employees hired before 1 January 2011. Benefits under these plans generally reflect age, years of service and compensation and are paid in the form of an annuity or lump sum. An independent actuary performs valuations annually. The Company funds the DB plans by contributing no less than the minimum amount required, but no more than the maximum tax deductible amount allowed under US Internal Revenue Service regulations. The range of contributions based upon these regulations can vary significantly based upon the funded status of the plans. At present, there is some flexibility in the amount that is contributed on an annual basis. In general, the Company’s policy for funding the US pension plans is to contribute the amounts collected in rates and capitalised in the rate base during the year, to the extent that the funding is no less than the minimum amount required. The assets of the plans are held in trusts and administered by fiduciary committees comprised of appointed employees of the Company.

National Grid also has several DC pension plans, primarily comprised of employee savings and Company matching contributions. Non-union employees hired after 1 January 2011, as well as new hires in 10 groups of represented union employees, receive a core contribution into the DC plan, irrespective of the employee’s contribution into the plan.

US retiree healthcare and life insurance plans

National Grid provides healthcare and life insurance benefits to eligible retired US employees. Eligibility is based on certain age and length of service requirements and in most cases retirees contribute to the cost of their healthcare coverage. In the US, there is no governmental requirement to pre-fund post-retirement health and welfare plans. However, in general, the Company’s policy for funding the US retiree healthcare and life insurance plans is to contribute amounts collected in rates and capitalised in the rate base during the year.

146National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements


   Financial Statements

29. Actuarial information on pensions and other post-retirement benefits continued

Asset allocations

Within the asset allocations below there is significant diversification across regions, asset managers, currencies and bond categories.

UK pensions

                       2016                                               2015                                               2014                     
    

Quoted

£m

   Unquoted
£m
   Total
£m
       Quoted
£m
   Unquoted
£m
   Total
£m
       Quoted
£m
   Unquoted
£m
  Total  
£m  

Equities1

   3,272     962     4,234       3,848     761     4,609       4,045     620   4,665  

Corporate bonds2

   5,601          5,601       6,494          6,494       5,706        5,706  

Government securities

   6,059          6,059       4,637          4,637       4,161        4,161  

Property

   90     1,081     1,171       86     1,082     1,168       33     1,057   1,090  

Diversified alternatives3

   159     505     664            716     716            793   793  

Liability matching assets4

   1,020          1,020       878          878       598        598  

Other5

   649     3     652        936     15     951        433     (37 396  
    16,850     2,551     19,401        16,879     2,574     19,453        14,976     2,433   17,409  

 

1.  Included within equities at 31 March 2016 were ordinary shares of National Grid plc with a value of £7m (2015: £14m; 2014: £15m).

2.  Included within corporate bonds at 31 March 2016 was an investment in a number of bonds issued by subsidiary undertakings with a value of £70m (2015: £80m; 2014: £72m).

3.  Includes return seeking non-conventional asset classes.

4.  Includes liability-driven investment vehicles.

5.  Includes cash and cash type instruments.

 

US pensions

 

                       2016                                               2015                                               2014                     
    Quoted
£m
   Unquoted
£m
   Total
£m
       Quoted
£m
   Unquoted
£m
   Total
£m
       Quoted
£m
   Unquoted
£m
  Total  
£m  

Equities1

   625     1,508     2,133       617     1,455     2,072       508     1,225   1,733  

Corporate bonds1

   954     483     1,437       969     473     1,442       823     336   1,159  

Government securities1

   711          711       727          727       632     28   660  

Property

        276     276            249     249            189   189  

Diversified alternatives1,2

   163     334     497       164     334     498       139     295   434  

Other

        82     82             64     64             54   54  
    2,453     2,683     5,136        2,477     2,575     5,052        2,102     2,127   4,229  

 

1.  Comparatives have been represented on a basis consistent with the current year presentation.

2.  Includes return seeking non-conventional asset classes.

 

US other post-retirement benefits

 

                       2016                                               2015                                               2014                     
    Quoted
£m
   Unquoted
£m
   Total
£m
       Quoted
£m
   Unquoted
£m
   Total
£m
       Quoted
£m
   Unquoted
£m
  Total  
£m  

Equities1

   281     853     1,134       289     872     1,161       245     823   1,068  

Corporate bonds

   37     1     38       34          34       2     10   12  

Government securities

   390          390       382          382       357     1   358  

Diversified alternatives1,2

   122     104     226       114     100     214       102     80   182  

Other

        109     109             112     112                –  
    830     1,067     1,897        819     1,084     1,903        706     914   1,620  

 

1.  Comparatives have been represented on a basis consistent with the current year presentation.

2.  Includes return seeking non-conventional asset classes.

Target asset allocations

Each plan’s investment strategy is formulated specifically in order to manage risk, through investment in diversified asset classes, including the use of liability matching assets and where appropriate through the employment of interest rate and inflation hedging instruments. The target asset allocation of the plans as at 31 March 2016 is as follows:

    UK pensions
%
   US pensions
%
   

US other
post-retirement
benefits

%

 

Equities

   21     40     65  

Other

   79     60     35  
    100     100     100  

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements147


Notes to the consolidated financial statements

– supplementary information continued

29. Actuarial information on pensions and other post-retirement benefitscontinued

Actuarial assumptions

The Company has applied the following financial assumptions in assessing DB liabilities.

                   UK pensions                                      US pensions                          US other post-retirement benefits     
    

2016

%

   

2015

%

   

2014

%

      

2016

%

   

2015

%

   

2014

%

      

2016

%

   

2015

%

   

2014

%

 

Discount rate1

   3.3     3.3     4.3      4.3     4.1     4.8      4.3     4.1     4.8  

Rate of increase in salaries2

   3.2     3.2     3.6      3.5     3.5     3.5      3.5     3.5     3.5  

Rate of increase in RPI3

   2.9     2.9     3.3      n/a     n/a     n/a      n/a     n/a     n/a  

Initial healthcare cost trend rate

   n/a     n/a     n/a      n/a     n/a     n/a      7.5     8.0     8.0  

Ultimate healthcare cost trend rate

   n/a     n/a     n/a       n/a     n/a     n/a       4.5     5.0     5.0  

1.The discount rates for pension liabilities have been determined by reference to appropriate yields on high-quality corporate bonds prevailing in the UK and US debt markets at the reporting date.
2.A promotional scale has also been used where appropriate. The UK assumption stated is that relating to service prior to 1 April 2014. The UK assumption for the rate of increase in salaries for service after this date is 2.1% (2015: 2.1%).
3.This is the key assumption that determines assumed increases in pensions in payment and deferment in the UK only. The assumptions for the UK were 2.9% (2015: 2.9%; 2014: 3.3%) for increases in pensions in payment and 2.9% (2015: 2.9%; 2014: 3.3%) for increases in pensions in deferment.

For sensitivity analysis see note 33.

     2016     2015     2014 
      UK
        years
   US
        years
      UK
       years
   US
        years
      UK
        years
   US
        years
 

Assumed life expectations for a retiree age 65

                

Today:

                

Males

     22.8     21.8      22.7     21.7      22.9     20.6  

Females

     25.2     24.0      25.1     23.9      25.4     22.9  

In 20 years:

                

Males

     25.1     23.5      24.9     23.4      25.2     22.8  

Females

     27.6     25.6       27.4     25.6       27.8     24.7  

Maturity profile of DB obligations

The weighted average duration of the DB obligation for each category of scheme is 16 years for UK pension schemes; 13 years for US pension schemes and 17 years for US other post-retirement benefits.

148National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements


   Financial Statements

30. Financial risk management

Our activities expose us to a variety of financial risks including currency risk, interest rate risk, commodity price risk, credit risk, capital risk and liquidity risk. Our risk management programme focuses on the unpredictability of financial markets and seeks to minimise potential volatility of financial performance from these risks. We use financial instruments, including derivative financial instruments, to manage risks of this type.

This note describes our approach to managing risk, including an analysis of assets and liabilities by currency type and an analysis of interest rate category for our net debt. We are required by accounting standards to also include a number of specific disclosures (such as a maturity analysis of contractual undiscounted cash flows) and have included these requirements below.

Risk management related to financing activities is carried out by a central treasury department under policies approved by the Finance Committee of the Board. The objective of the treasury department is to manage funding and liquidity requirements, including managing associated financial risks, to within acceptable boundaries. The Finance Committee provides written principles for overall risk management, as well as written policies covering specific areas such as foreign exchange risk, interest rate risk, credit risk, liquidity risk, use of derivative financial instruments and non-derivative financial instruments, and investment of excess liquidity.

We have exposure to the following risks, which are described in more detail below:

credit risk;
liquidity risk;
interest rate risk;
currency risk;
commodity risk; and
capital risk.

(a) Credit risk

We are exposed to the risk of loss resulting from counterparties’ default on their commitments including failure to pay or make a delivery on a contract. This risk is inherent in our commercial business activities. We are exposed to credit risk on our cash and cash equivalents, derivative financial instruments, deposits with banks and financial institutions, as well as credit exposures to wholesale and retail customers, including outstanding receivables and committed transactions.

Treasury credit risk

Counterparty risk arises from the investment of surplus funds and from the use of derivative financial instruments. As at 31 March 2016, the following limits were in place for investments held with banks and financial institutions:

    Maximum limit
£m
   Long-term limit
£m
 

Triple ‘A’ G8 sovereign entities (AAA)

   Unlimited     Unlimited  

Triple ‘A’ vehicles (AAA)

   322     273  

Triple ‘A’ range institutions and non G8 sovereign entities (AAA)

   1,099 to 1,658     553 to 867  

Double ‘A+’ G8 sovereign entities (AA+)

   1,658     867  

Double ‘A’ range institutions (AA)

   656 to 826     334 to 413  

Single ‘A’ range institutions (A)

   226 to 322     115 to 165  

As at 31 March 2015 and 2016, we had a number of exposures to individual counterparties. In accordance with our treasury policies, counterparty credit exposure utilisations are monitored daily against the counterparty credit limits. Counterparty credit ratings and market conditions are reviewed continually with limits being revised and utilisation adjusted, if appropriate. Management does not expect any significant losses from non performance by these counterparties.

Commodity credit risk

The credit policy for commodity transactions is owned and monitored by the Energy Procurement Risk Management Committee, under authority delegated by the Board and Executive Committee, and establishes controls and procedures to determine, monitor and minimise the credit risk of counterparties.

Wholesale and retail credit risk

Our principal commercial exposure in the UK is governed by the credit rules within the regulated codes: Uniform Network Code and Connection and Use of System Code. These set out the level of credit relative to the RAV for each credit rating. In the US, we are required to supply electricity and gas under state regulations. Our credit policies and practices are designed to limit credit exposure by collecting security deposits prior to providing utility services, or after utility service has commenced if certain applicable regulatory requirements are met. Collection activities are managed on a daily basis. Sales to retail customers are usually settled in cash, cheques, electronic bank payments or by using major credit cards. We are committed to measuring, monitoring, minimising and recording counterparty credit risk in our wholesale business. The utilisation of credit limits is regularly monitored and collateral is collected against these accounts when necessary. Management does not expect any significant losses of receivables that have not been provided for as shown in note 17.

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements149


Notes to the consolidated financial statements

– supplementary information continued

30. Financial risk managementcontinued

a) Credit riskcontinued

Offsetting financial assets and liabilities

The following tables set out our financial assets and liabilities which are subject to offset and to enforceable master netting arrangements or similar agreements. The tables show the amounts which are offset and reported net in the statement of financial position. Amounts which cannot be offset under IFRS, but which could be settled net under terms of master netting agreements if certain conditions arise, and with collateral received or pledged, are shown to present National Grid’s net exposure.

Financial assets and liabilities on different transactions are only reported net if the transactions are with the same counterparty, a legal right of offset exists and the cash flows are intended to be settled on a net basis.

Amounts which do not meet the criteria for offsetting on the statement of financial position but could be settled net in certain circumstances principally relate to derivative transactions under ISDA agreements where each party has the option to settle amounts on a net basis in the event of default of the other party.

Commodity contracts that have not been offset on the balance sheet may be settled net in certain circumstances under ISDA or NAESB (North American Energy Standards Board) agreements.

National Grid has similar arrangements in relation to bank account balances and bank overdrafts; and trade payables and trade receivables which are subject to general terms and conditions. However, these balances are immaterial.

            Related amounts
  available to be offset but  
not offset in statement
of financial position
    
At 31 March 2016   
 
 
 
Gross
carrying
amounts
£m
  
  
  
  
  
 
 

 

Gross
amounts
offset

£m

  
  
1 

  

  
 
 
 
 

 

Net amount
presented in
statement
of financial
position

£m

  
  
  
  
  

  

  
 
 
Financial
instruments
£m
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
Cash
collateral
received/
pledged
£m
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
Net amount
£m
  
  

Assets

       

Derivative financial instruments

   1,963        1,963    (997  (597  369  

Commodity contracts

   33    (1  32    (4      28  
    1,996    (1  1,995    (1,001  (597  397  

Liabilities

       

Derivative financial instruments

   (2,069      (2,069  997    932    (140

Commodity contracts

   (145  10    (135  4    20    (111
    (2,214  10    (2,204  1,001    952    (251

    

                         
    (218  9    (209      355    146  
            

 

Related amounts

    available to be offset but    
not offset in statement
of financial position

    
At 31 March 2015   
 
 
 
Gross
carrying
amounts
£m
  
  
  
  
  
 
 

 

Gross
amounts
offset

£m

  
  
1  

  

  
 
 
 
 

 

Net amount
presented in
statement of
financial
position

£m

  
  
  
  
  

  

  
 
 
Financial
instruments
£m
  
  
  
  
 
 
 

 

Cash
collateral
received/
pledged

£m

  
  
  
  

  

  
 
Net amount
£m
  
  

Assets

       

Derivative financial instruments

   1,716        1,716    (839  (527  350  

Commodity contracts

   64        64    (11      53  
    1,780        1,780    (850  (527  403  

Liabilities

       

Derivative financial instruments

   (2,399      (2,399  839    1,125    (435

Commodity contracts

   (182  11    (171  11        (160
    (2,581  11    (2,570  850    1,125    (595

    

                         
    (801  11    (790      598    (192

1.The gross financial assets and liabilities offset in the statement of financial position primarily relate to commodity contracts. Offsets relate to margin payments for NYMEX gas futures which are traded on a recognised exchange.

150National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements


   Financial Statements

30. Financial risk managementcontinued

(b) Liquidity risk

Our policy is to determine our liquidity requirements by the use of both short-term and long-term cash flow forecasts. These forecasts are supplemented by a financial headroom analysis which is used to assess funding requirements for at least a 24 month period and maintain adequate liquidity for a continuous 12 month period.

We believe our contractual obligations, including those shown in commitments and contingencies in note 27 can be met from existing cash and investments, operating cash flows and other financings that we reasonably expect to be able to secure in the future, together with the use of committed facilities if required.

Our debt agreements and banking facilities contain covenants, including those relating to the periodic and timely provision of financial information by the issuing entity and financial covenants such as restrictions on the level of subsidiary indebtedness. Failure to comply with these covenants, or to obtain waivers of those requirements, could in some cases trigger a right, at the lender’s discretion, to require repayment of some of our debt and may restrict our ability to draw upon our facilities or access the capital markets.

The following is an analysis of the contractual undiscounted cash flows payable under financial liabilities and derivative assets and liabilities as at the reporting date:

At 31 March 2016  

  Less than

1 year

£m

   

1 to 2

years

£m

   

2 to 3

years

£m

   

More than

3 years

£m

   

Total

£m

 

Non-derivative financial liabilities

          

Borrowings, excluding finance lease liabilities

   (3,225   (1,777   (1,760   (20,831   (27,593

Interest payments on borrowings1

   (839   (806   (746   (13,549   (15,940

Finance lease liabilities

   (53   (58   (43   (130   (284

Other non-interest bearing liabilities

   (2,755   (230             (2,985

Derivative financial liabilities

          

Derivative contracts – receipts

   314     487     846     811     2,458  

Derivative contracts – payments

   (389   (964   (855   (914   (3,122

Commodity contracts

   (104   (32   (9   1     (144
    (7,051   (3,380   (2,567   (34,612   (47,610
At 31 March 2015  

Less than
1 year

£m

   

1 to 2
years

£m

   

2 to 3
years

£m

   

More than

3 years

£m

   

Total

£m

 

Non-derivative financial liabilities

          

Borrowings, excluding finance lease liabilities

   (2,289   (1,179   (1,513   (20,235   (25,216

Interest payments on borrowings1

   (790   (790   (766   (13,587   (15,933

Finance lease liabilities

   (44   (41   (32   (86   (203

Other non-interest bearing liabilities

   (2,744   (216             (2,960

Derivative financial liabilities

          

Derivative contracts – receipts

   602     244     411     1,194     2,451  

Derivative contracts – payments

   (935   (318   (952   (1,631   (3,836

Commodity contracts

   (116   (43   (21        (180
    (6,316   (2,343   (2,873   (34,345   (45,877

1.The interest on borrowings is calculated based on borrowings held at 31 March without taking account of future issues. Floating rate interest is estimated using a forward interest rate curve as at 31 March. Payments are included on the basis of the earliest date on which the Company can be required to settle.

(c) Interest rate risk

National Grid’s interest rate risk arises from our long-term borrowings. Borrowings issued at variable rates expose National Grid to cash flow interest rate risk, partially offset by cash held at variable rates. Borrowings issued at fixed rates expose National Grid to fair value interest rate risk.

Our interest rate risk management policy is to seek to minimise total financing costs (being interest costs and changes in the market value of debt) subject to constraints. We do this by using fixed and floating rate debt and derivative financial instruments including interest rate swaps, swaptions and forward rate agreements.

We hold some borrowings on issue that are inflation linked. We believe that these provide a partial economic offset to the inflation risk associated with our UK inflation linked revenues.

The table in note 19 sets out the carrying amount, by contractual maturity, of borrowings that are exposed to interest rate risk before taking into account interest rate swaps.

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements151


Notes to the consolidated financial statements

– supplementary information continued

30. Financial risk managementcontinued

(c) Interest rate riskcontinued

During 2016 and 2015, net debt was managed using derivative instruments to hedge interest rate risk as follows:

   2016    2015
    
 
Fixed rate
£m
  
  
  
 

 

Floating
rate

£m

  
  

  

  
 
 
Inflation
linked
£m
  
  
  
  

 

Other

£m

1 

  

  
 
Total
£m
  
  
    
 
  Fixed rate
£m
  
  
  
 

 

Floating
rate

£m

  
  

  

  
 
 
Inflation
linked
£m
  
  
  
  

 

Other

£m

1 

  

 

Total  

£m  

Cash and cash equivalents

   1    126            127     1    118           119  

Financial investments

   54    2,939        5    2,998     281    2,273        5   2,559  

Borrowings2

   (17,706  (3,008  (7,629  (1  (28,344    (16,229  (2,746  (6,933  (2 (25,910) 

Pre-derivative position

   (17,651  57    (7,629  4    (25,219   (15,947  (355  (6,933  3   (23,232) 

Derivative effect3

   1,788    (2,481  587        (106    1,593    (2,294  18       (683) 

Net debt position

   (15,863  (2,424  (7,042  4    (25,325    (14,354  (2,649  (6,915  3   (23,915) 

1. Represents financial instruments which are not directly affected by interest rate risk, such as investments in equity or other similar financial instruments.

2. Includes bank overdrafts.

3. The impact of 2016/17 (2015: 2015/16) maturing short-dated interest rate derivatives is included.

 

(d) Currency risk

National Grid operates internationally and is exposed to foreign exchange risk arising from various currency exposures, primarily with respect to the dollar. Foreign exchange risk arises from future commercial transactions, recognised assets and liabilities, and investments in foreign operations.

 

Our policy for managing foreign exchange transaction risk is to hedge contractually committed foreign currency cash flows over a prescribed minimum size. Where foreign currency cash flow forecasts are less certain, our policy is to hedge a proportion of such cash flows based on the probability of those cash flows occurring. Instruments used to manage foreign exchange transaction risk include foreign exchange forward contracts and foreign exchange swaps.

 

Our policy for managing foreign exchange translation risk relating to our net investment in foreign operations is to maintain a percentage of net debt and foreign exchange forwards so as to provide an economic offset. The primary managed foreign exchange exposure arises from the dollar denominated assets and liabilities held by our US operations, with a further small euro exposure in respect of a joint venture investment.

 

During 2016 and 2015, derivative financial instruments were used to manage foreign currency risk as follows:

 

   2016    2015
    Sterling
£m
  Euro
£m
  Dollar
£m
  Other
£m
  Total
£m
     Sterling
£m
  Euro
£m
  Dollar
£m
  Other
£m
  

Total  

£m  

Cash and cash equivalents

   3    1    123        127     12        107       119  

Financial investments

   1,201    105    1,622    70    2,998     1,227    90    1,181    61   2,559  

Borrowings1

   (13,131  (5,061  (8,806  (1,346  (28,344    (11,791  (5,099  (7,604  (1,416 (25,910) 

Pre-derivative position

   (11,927  (4,955  (7,061  (1,276  (25,219   (10,552  (5,009  (6,316  (1,355 (23,232) 

Derivative effect

   2,374    4,971    (8,989  1,538    (106    1,608    5,203    (8,858  1,364   (683) 

Net debt position

   (9,553  16    (16,050  262    (25,325    (8,944  194    (15,174  9   (23,915) 

1. Includes bank overdrafts.

 

The overall exposure to dollars largely relates to our net investment hedge activities as described in note 15.

 

The currency exposure on other financial instruments is as follows:

 

   2016    2015
    Sterling
£m
  Euro
£m
  Dollar
£m
  Other
£m
  Total
£m
     Sterling
£m
  Euro
£m
  Dollar
£m
  Other
£m
  

Total  

£m  

Trade and other receivables

   220    8    1,236        1,464     200        1,495       1,695  

Trade and other payables

   (1,380      (1,471      (2,851   (1,403      (1,457     (2,860) 

Other non-current assets

   (17      (252      (269    (19      (252     (271) 

The carrying amounts of other financial instruments are denominated in the above currencies, which in most instances are the functional currency of the respective subsidiaries. Our exposure to dollars is due to activities in our US subsidiaries. We do not have any other significant exposure to currency risk on these balances.

152National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements


   Financial Statements

30. Financial risk managementcontinued

(e) Commodity risk

We purchase electricity and gas to supply our customers in the US and to meet our own energy needs. Substantially all our costs of purchasing electricity and gas for supply to customers are recoverable at an amount equal to cost. The timing of recovery of these costs can vary between financial periods leading to an under- or over-recovery within any particular year that can lead to large fluctuations in the income statement. We follow approved policies to manage price and supply risks for our commodity activities.

Our energy procurement risk management policy and delegations of authority govern our US commodity trading activities for energy transactions. The purpose of this policy is to ensure we transact within pre-defined risk parameters and only in the physical and financial markets where we or our customers have a physical market requirement. In addition, state regulators require National Grid to manage commodity risk and cost volatility prudently through diversified pricing strategies. In some jurisdictions we are required to file a plan outlining our strategy to be approved by regulators. In certain cases we might receive guidance with regard to specific hedging limits.

Energy purchase contracts for the forward purchase of electricity or gas that are used to satisfy physical delivery requirements to customers or for energy that the Company uses itself meet the normal purchase, sale or usage exemption of IAS 39. They are, therefore, not recognised in the financial statements. Disclosure of commitments under such contracts is made in note 27.

We enter into forward contracts for the purchase of commodities, some of which do not meet the own use exemption for accounting purposes and hence are accounted for as derivatives. We also enter into derivative financial instruments linked to commodity prices, including index-linked futures, swaps and options contracts. These derivative financial instruments are used to manage market price volatility and are carried at fair value on the statement of financial position, with the mark-to-market changes reflected through earnings.

The fair value of our commodity contracts by type can be analysed as follows:

   2016     2015 
    

  Assets

£m

   

Liabilities

£m

  

      Total

£m

      

  Assets

£m

   

Liabilities

£m

  

      Total

£m

 

Commodity purchase contracts accounted for as derivative contracts

           

Forward purchases of electricity

        (26  (26         (42  (42

Forward purchases of gas

   25     (27  (2    42     (42    

Derivative financial instruments linked to commodity prices

           

Electricity capacity

   2         2                 

Electricity swaps

   2     (69  (67    21     (59  (38

Electricity options

        (1  (1         (1  (1

Gas swaps

   3     (12  (9     1     (27  (26
    32     (135  (103     64     (171  (107

The maturity profile of commodity contracts is as follows:

 

  

   2016     2015 
    Assets
£m
   Liabilities
£m
  Total
£m
      

Assets

£m

   Liabilities
£m
  Total
£m
 

Current

           

Less than one year

   22     (96  (74     35     (116  (81
    22     (96  (74     35     (116  (81

Non-current

           

In 1 to 2 years

   8     (30  (22    25     (37  (12

In 2 to 3 years

   1     (9  (8    2     (18  (16

In 3 to 4 years

                  1         1  

In 4 to 5 years

                  1         1  

More than 5 years

   1         1                  
    10     (39  (29     29     (55  (26
    32     (135  (103     64     (171  (107

For each class of commodity contract, our exposure based on the notional quantities is as follows:

      2016     2015 

Forward purchases of electricity1

     481 GWh       984 GWh  

Forward purchases/sales of gas2

     44m Dth       55m Dth  

Electricity swaps

     11,786 GWh       10,779 GWh  

Electricity options

     22,375 GWh       25,157 GWh  

Electricity capacity

     1 kWm         

Gas swaps

     76m Dth       65m Dth  

Gas options

     16m Dth       4m Dth  

NYMEX gas futures3

     14m Dth       20m Dth  

1. Forward electricity purchases have terms up to three years. The contractual obligations under these contracts are £40m (2015: £77m).

2. Forward gas purchases have terms up to five years. The contractual obligations under these contracts are £20m (2015: £26m).

3. NYMEX gas futures have been offset with related margin accounts (see note 30(a)).

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements153


Notes to the consolidated financial statements

– supplementary information continued

30. Financial risk managementcontinued

(f) Capital risk management

The capital structure of the Group consists of shareholders’ equity, as disclosed in the consolidated statement of changes in equity, and net debt (note 26). National Grid’s objectives when managing capital are: to safeguard our ability to continue as a going concern; to remain within regulatory constraints of our regulated operating companies; and to maintain an efficient mix of debt and equity funding thus achieving an optimal capital structure and cost of capital. We regularly review and manage the capital structure as appropriate in order to achieve these objectives.

Maintaining appropriate credit ratings for our regulated companies is an important aspect of our capital risk management strategy and balance sheet efficiency. As noted on page 25, we monitor our balance sheet efficiency using several metrics including our retained cash flow/net debt and interest cover. Interest cover for the year ended 31 March 2016 was 5.5 (2015: 5.1). Our long-term target range for interest cover is greater than 3.0, which we believe is consistent with single A range long-term senior unsecured debt credit ratings within our main UK operating companies, NGET and NGG, based on guidance from the rating agencies.

In addition, we monitor the RAV gearing within each of NGET and the regulated transmission and distribution businesses within NGG. This is calculated as net debt expressed as a percentage of RAV, and indicates the level of debt employed to fund our UK regulated businesses. It is compared with the level of RAV gearing indicated by Ofgem as being appropriate for these businesses, at around 60 to 65%.

The majority of our regulated operating companies in the US and the UK (and one intermediate UK holding company), are subject to certain restrictions on the payment of dividends by administrative order, contract and/or licence. The types of restrictions that a company may have that would prevent a dividend being declared or paid unless they are met include:

dividends must be approved in advance by the relevant US state regulatory commission;
the subsidiary must have at least two recognised rating agency credit ratings of at least investment grade;
dividends must be limited to cumulative retained earnings, including pre-acquisition retained earnings;
National Grid plc must maintain an investment grade credit rating and if that rating is the lowest investment grade bond rating it cannot have a negative watch/review for downgrade notice by a credit rating agency;
the subsidiary must not carry on any activities other than those permitted by the licences;
the subsidiary must not create any cross-default obligations or give or receive any intra-group cross-subsidies; and
the percentage of equity compared with total capital of the subsidiary must remain above certain levels.

There is a further restriction relating only to the Narragansett Electric Company, which is required to maintain its consolidated net worth above certain levels.

These restrictions are subject to alteration in the US as and when a new rate case or rate plan is agreed with the relevant regulatory bodies for each operating company and in the UK through the normal licence review process.

As most of our business is regulated, at 31 March 2016 the majority of our net assets are subject to some of the restrictions noted above. These restrictions are not considered to be significantly onerous, nor do we currently expect they will prevent the planned payment of dividends in future in line with our dividend policy.

Some of our regulatory and bank loan agreements additionally impose lower limits for the long-term credit ratings that certain companies within the Group must hold. All the above requirements are monitored on a regular basis in order to ensure compliance. The Company has complied with all externally imposed capital requirements to which it is subject.

(g) Fair value analysis

The financial instruments included on the statement of financial position are measured at fair value. These fair values can be categorised into hierarchy levels that are representative of the inputs used in measuring the fair value. The best evidence of fair value is a quoted price in an actively traded market. In the event that the market for a financial instrument is not active, a valuation technique is used.

   2016     2015 
        Level 1
£m
   Level 2
£m
  Level 3
£m
  Total
£m
          Level 1
£m
   Level 2
£m
  Level 3
£m
  Total
£m
 

Assets

             

Available-for-sale investments

   2,040     393        2,433      1,315     247        1,562  

Derivative financial instruments

        1,945    18    1,963           1,702    14    1,716  

Commodity contracts

        5    27    32            22    42    64  
    2,040     2,343    45    4,428       1,315     1,971    56    3,342  

Liabilities

             

Derivative financial instruments

        (1,855  (214  (2,069         (2,219  (180  (2,399

Commodity contracts

        (81  (54  (135          (87  (84  (171
         (1,936  (268  (2,204          (2,306  (264  (2,570
    2,040     407    (223  2,224       1,315     (335  (208  772  

Level 1:Financial instruments with quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.
Level 2:Financial instruments with quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets or quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in inactive markets and financial instruments valued using models where all significant inputs are based directly or indirectly on observable market data.
Level 3:Financial instruments valued using valuation techniques where one or more significant inputs are based on unobservable market data.

154National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements


   Financial Statements

30. Financial risk managementcontinued

(g) Fair value analysiscontinued

Our level 3 derivative financial instruments include cross-currency swaps, inflation linked swaps and equity options, all of which are traded on illiquid markets. In valuing these instruments a third-party valuation is obtained to support each reported fair value.

Our level 3 commodity contracts primarily consist of our forward purchases of electricity and gas where pricing inputs are unobservable, as well as other complex transactions. Complex transactions can introduce the need for internally developed models based on reasonable assumptions. Industry standard valuation techniques such as the Black-Scholes pricing model and Monte Carlo simulation are used for valuing such instruments. Level 3 is also applied in cases when optionality is present or where an extrapolated forward curve is considered unobservable. All published forward curves are verified to market data; if forward curves differ from market data by 5% or more they are considered unobservable.

The changes in value of our level 3 derivative financial instruments are as follows:

      Derivative financial    
instruments
    

Commodity

contracts

    Total 
   

 

    2016

£m

  

  

  

 

    2015

£m

  

  

    

 

    2016

£m

  

  

  

 

    2015

£m

  

  

    

 

    2016

£m

  

  

  

 

    2015

£m

  

  

At 1 April

  (166  (100   (42  (58   (208  (158

Net gains/(losses) for the year1,2

  (20  (63   (27  (53   (47  (116

Purchases3

  1         13    38     14    38  

Settlements

  (11  (3   29    28     18    25  

Reclassification/transfers out of level 3

                3          3  

At 31 March

  (196  (166    (27  (42    (223  (208

1. Loss of £17m (2015: £63m loss) is attributable to derivative financial instruments held at the end of the reporting period and has been recognised in finance costs in the income statement.

2. Loss of £28m (2015: £48m loss) is attributable to commodity contract financial instruments held at the end of the reporting period.

3. Purchases in the year relate to equity options.

The impacts on a post-tax basis of reasonably possible changes in significant level 3 assumptions are as follows:

  Derivative financial
instruments
    

Commodity

contracts

 
   

2016

Income

statement
£m

  

2015

Income

statement
£m

     2016
Income
statement
£m
  2015
Income
statement
£m
 

10% increase in commodity prices1

           4    4  

10% decrease in commodity prices1

               (3

Volume forecast uplift2

           (1  (2

Volume forecast reduction2

           1    2  

+10% market area price change

           (2  (4

–10% market area price change

           2    4  

+20 basis point change in Limited Price Inflation (LPI) market curve3

  (83  (77         

–20 basis points change in LPI market curve3

  80    75            

1. Level 3 commodity price sensitivity is included within the sensitivity analysis disclosed in note 33.

2. Volumes were flexed using maximum and minimum historical averages, or by >10% where historical averages were not available.

3. A reasonably possible change in assumption of other level 3 derivative financial instruments is unlikely to result in a material change in fair values.

The impacts disclosed above were considered on a contract by contract basis with the most significant unobservable inputs identified.

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements155


Notes to the consolidated financial statements

– supplementary information continued

31. Borrowing facilities

To support our long-term liquidity requirements and provide backup to commercial paper and other borrowings, we agree loan facilities with financial institutions over and above the value of borrowings that may be required. These facilities have never been drawn, and our undrawn amounts are listed below.

At 31 March 2016, we had bilateral committed credit facilities of £2,808m (2015: £2,094m). In addition, we had committed credit facilities from syndicates of banks of £295m at 31 March 2016 (2015: £884m). All committed credit facilities were undrawn in 2016 and 2015. An analysis of the maturity of these undrawn committed facilities is shown below:

    

2016

£m

   

2015

£m

 

Undrawn committed borrowing facilities expiring:

    

Less than 1 year

        572  

In 1 to 2 years

          

In 2 to 3 years

   1,115     874  

In 3 to 4 years

   295     1,220  

In 4 to 5 years

        312  

More than 5 years

   1,693       
         3,103          2,978  

Of the unused facilities at 31 March 2016, £2,808m (2015: £2,666m) was held as backup to commercial paper and similar borrowings, while £295m (2015: £312m) is available as backup to specific US borrowings.

In addition to the above, the Group has a bank loan agreement totalling £1,500m with the European Investment Bank (EIB), of which £900m is currently undrawn, and an Export Credit Agreement (ECA) totalling £162m, which is undrawn.

Further information on our bonds can be found on the debt investor section of our website.

156National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements


   Financial Statements

32. Subsidiary undertakings, joint ventures and associates

 

 

While we present consolidated results in these financial statements as if we were one company, our legal structure is such that there are a number of different operating and holding companies that contribute to the overall result. This structure has evolved through acquisitions as well as regulatory requirements to have certain activities within separate legal entities.

 

Subsidiary undertakings

A list of the Group’s subsidiaries as at 31 March 2016 is given below. The entire share capital of subsidiaries is held within the Group except where the Group’s ownership percentages are shown. These percentages give the Group’s ultimate interest and therefore allow for the situation where subsidiaries are owned by partly-owned intermediate subsidiaries. Where subsidiaries have different classes of shares, this is largely for historical reasons and the effective percentage holdings given represent both the Group’s voting rights and equity holding. Shares in National Grid (US) Holdings Limited, National Grid Holdings One plc and NGG Finance plc are held directly by National Grid plc. All other holdings in subsidiaries are owned by other subsidiaries of the National Grid plc Group. All subsidiaries are consolidated in the Group’s financial statements.

Principal Group companies are identified inbold. These companies are incorporated and principally operate in the countries under which they are shown.

 

Principal subsidiary undertakings

The principal subsidiary undertakings included in the consolidated financial statements at 31 March 2015 are listed below. These undertakings are wholly owned and, unless otherwise indicated, are incorporatedIncorporated in England and Wales.

Principal activity

Boston Gas Company1Distribution of gas
KeySpan Gas East Corporation1Distribution of gas
The Brooklyn Union Gas Company1Distribution of gas
Massachusetts Electric Company1Distribution of electricity
Wales  National Grid Interconnectors LimitedElectricity interconnector operatorProperty (High Wycombe) Limited*
National Grid Generation LLC1Generation of electricity
National Grid Grain LNGBeegas Nominees LimitedLNG importation and storage
National Grid Metering LimitedMetering services
  National Grid Property Holdings LimitedProperty services
Birch Sites Limited  National Grid Gas plcTransmission and distribution of gasProperty Limited*
The Narragansett Electric Company1Transmission and distribution of electricity
Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation1Transmission of electricity and distribution of electricity and gas
Carbon Sentinel Limited  National Grid Electricity Transmission plcProperty (Northfleet) Limited**
Gridcom Limited  Transmission of electricityNational Grid Property (Taunton) Limited*
Icelink Interconnector Limited  New England Power Company1National Grid Seven Limited*
KeySpan (U.K.)**  Transmission of electricityNational Grid Seventeen Limited
Landranch Limited  British Transco Finance Inc.1National Grid Smart Limited
Lattice Group Employee Benefit Trust Limited  FinancingNational Grid Ten
British Transco International Finance BV (incorporated in the Netherlands)Financing
NGG Finance plcFinancing
KeySpan Corporation1Holding company
Lattice Group plc  Holding companyNational Grid Thirty Eight Limited
Lattice Group Trustees Limited  National Grid Commercial HoldingsThirty Five LimitedHolding company
Natgrid Finance Holdings Limited*  National Grid Gas HoldingsThirty Four LimitedHolding company
Natgrid Finance Limited*  National Grid HoldingsThirty LimitedHolding company
Natgrid Limited  National Grid Holdings One plcHolding companyThirty Seven Limited
NatGrid One Limited  National Grid North America Inc.1Thirty Six Limited
NatgridTW1 Limited  Holding companyNational Grid Three Limited*
National Grid (US) Holdings Limited  Holding companyNational Grid Twelve Limited
National Grid (US) Investments 2 Limited  National Grid Twenty Eight Limited
National Grid (US) Investments 4 Limited  Holding companyNational Grid Twenty Four Limited*
National Grid (US) Partner 1 Limited  Holding companyNational Grid Twenty Seven Limited
National Grid Belgium Limited  National Grid USA1Twenty Three Limited
National Grid Blue Power Limited  Holding companyNational Grid Twenty-Five Limited
National Grid Carbon Limited  Niagara MohawkNational Grid UK Limited
National Grid Commercial Holdings Inc.1Limited  Holding companyNational Grid UK Pension Services Limited
National Grid Eight*National Grid Viking Link Limited
National Grid Eighteen Limited*National Grid William Limited
National Grid Electricity Group Trustee LimitedNG Luxembourg Holdings Limited*
National Grid Electricity Transmission plcNG Nominees Limited
National Grid Energy Metering LimitedNGC Employee Shares Trustee Limited
National Grid Five Limited*NGG Finance plc
National Grid Four LimitedNGG Telecoms Holdings Limited*
National Grid Fourteen LimitedNGG Telecoms Limited*
National Grid Gas Finance (No 1) plcNgrid Intellectual Property Limited
National Grid Gas Holdings LimitedNGT Telecom No. 1 Limited
National Grid Gas plcNGT Two Limited
National Grid Grain LNG LimitedPort Greenwich Limited
National Grid Holdings LimitedStargas Nominees Limited
National Grid Holdings One plcSupergrid Electricity Limited
National Grid IFA 2 LimitedSupergrid Energy Transmission Limited
National Grid Interconnector Holdings LimitedSupergrid Limited
National Grid Interconnectors LimitedTelecom International Holdings Limited*
National Grid International LimitedThamesport Interchange Limited
National Grid Land and Properties Limited*The National Grid Group Quest Trustee Company Limited
National Grid Metering LimitedThe National Grid YouPlan Trustee Limited
National Grid Nine Limited*Transco Limited
National Grid North Sea Link LimitedXoserve Limited (56.5%)
National Grid Offshore Limited
  

 

*Dissolved 14 April 2016 **In liquidation

1. Incorporated in the US.

Principal joint ventures and associates
The principal joint ventures and associated undertakings included in the financial statements at 31 March 2015 are listed below. These undertakings are incorporated in England and Wales (unless otherwise indicated).
 % of ordinary
National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16 shares heldPrincipal activity
Financial Statements 

BritNed Development Limited150UK/Netherlands interconnector
NGET/SPT Upgrades Limited50England/Scotland interconnector
Millennium Pipeline Company, LLC226.25Transmission of gas
Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.220.4Transmission of gas

1. Financial year end of 31 December.

2. Incorporated in the US.

The Group comprises a large number of entities and it is not practical to include all of them in this list. This list therefore includes brief details for those principal companies which, in the Directors’ opinion, have a significant impact on the revenue, profit or assets of the Group. A full list of subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates is annexed to the Company’s Annual Return filed with the Registrar of Companies.

Our interests and activities are held or operated through subsidiaries, branches, joint arrangements or associates established in – and subject to the laws and regulations of – a number of different jurisdictions.

157


Notes to the consolidated financial statements

– supplementary information continued

32. Subsidiary undertakings, joint ventures and associatescontinued

Incorporated in the US

Boston Gas Company

British Transco Capital Inc.

British Transco Finance, Inc.

Broken Bridge Corp.

Colonial Gas Company

EUA Energy Investment Corporation

GridAmerica Holdings Inc.

Grid NY LLC

KeySpan CI Midstream Limited

KeySpan Corporation

KeySpan Energy Corporation

KeySpan Energy Services Inc.

KeySpan Gas East Corporation

KeySpan International Corporation

KeySpan MHK, Inc.

KeySpan Midstream, Inc.

KeySpan Plumbing Solutions, Inc.

KSI Contracting, LLC

KSI Electrical, LLC

KSI Mechanical, LLC

Land Management & Development, Inc.

Landwest, Inc.

Massachusetts Electric Company

Metro Energy L.L.C.

Metrowest Realty LLC

Mystic Steamship Corporation

Nantucket Electric Company

National Grid Algonquin LLC

National Grid Development Holdings Corp.

National Grid Electric Services LLC

National Grid Energy Management LLC

National Grid Energy Services LLC

National Grid Energy Trading Services LLC

National Grid Engineering & Survey Inc.

National Grid Generation LLC

National Grid Generation Ventures LLC

National Grid Glenwood Energy Center LLC

National Grid IGTS Corp.

National Grid Insurance USA Ltd

National Grid Islander East Pipeline LLC

National Grid LNG GP LLC

National Grid LNG LLC

National Grid LNG LP LLC

National Grid Millennium LLC

National Grid NE Holdings 2 LLC

National Grid North America Inc.

National Grid North East Ventures Inc.

National Grid Port Jefferson Energy Center LLC

National Grid Services, Inc.

National Grid Technologies Inc.

National Grid Transmission Services Corporation

National Grid US LLC

National Grid US 6 LLC

National Grid USA

National Grid USA Service Company, Inc.

Nees Energy, Inc.

New England Electric Transmission Corporation

New England Energy Incorporated

New England Hydro Finance Company, Inc. (53.704%)

New England Hydro-Transmission Corporation (53.704%)

New England Hydro-Transmission Electric Company, Inc. (53.704%)

New England Power Company

Newport America Corporation

NGNE LLC

Niagara Mohawk Energy, Inc.

Niagara Mohawk Holdings, Inc.

Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation

NM Properties, Inc.

North East Transmission Co., Inc.

Opinac North America, Inc.

Philadelphia Coke Co., Inc.

Port of the Islands North LLC

The Brooklyn Union Gas Company

The Narragansett Electric Company

Transgas Inc.

Upper Hudson Development Inc.

Valley Appliance and Merchandising Company

Wayfinder Group, Inc.

Incorporated in Australia

National Grid Australia Pty Limited

Incorporated in Canada

Keyspan Energy Development Co.

Incorporated in the Cayman Islands

British Transco Finance (No 1) Limited**

British Transco Finance (No 2) Limited**

Keyspan C.I. II Ltd**

Keyspan C.I. Ltd**

NGT Five Limited**

NGT Four Limited**

Incorporated in Chile

Inversiones ABC Limitada (98.84%)

SCC Uno S.A.

Incorporated in the Isle of Man

Lattice Telecom Finance (No 1) Limited**

National Grid (IOM) UK Ltd**

National Grid Insurance Company (Isle of Man) Limited

NGT Holding Company (Isle of Man) Limited

Incorporated in Jersey

National Grid Jersey Investments Limited

NG Jersey Limited

Incorporated in the Netherlands

British Transco International Finance B.V.

National Grid Holdings B.V.

Incorporated in the Republic of Ireland

National Grid (Ireland) 1**

National Grid (Ireland) 2**

National Grid Insurance Company (Ireland) Designated Activity Company

*Dissolved 14 April 2016 **In liquidation

 

 

       150158National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements 


 

   Financial Statements

 

 

    

  

33. Sensitivities on areas of estimation and uncertainty

 

  

  

 

In order to give a clearer picture of the impact on our results or financial position of potential changes in significant estimates and assumptions, the following sensitivities are presented. These sensitivities are hypothetical, as they are based on assumptions and conditions prevailing at the year end, and should be used with caution. The effects provided are not necessarily indicative of the actual effects that would be experienced because our actual exposures are constantly changing.

 

     

 
  The sensitivities in the tables below show the potential impact in the income statement (and consequential impact on net assets) for a range of different variables each of which have been considered in isolation (i.e. with all other variables remaining constant). There are a number of these sensitivities which are mutually exclusive and therefore if one were to happen, another would not, meaning a total showing how sensitive our results are to these external factors is not meaningful.     
 
  We are further required to show additional sensitivity analysis for changes in interest and exchange rates and these are shown separately in the subsequent table due to the additional assumptions that are made in order to produce meaningful sensitivity disclosures.    
 
  

The sensitivities included in the tables below all have an equal and opposite effect if the sensitivity increases or decreases by the same amount unless otherwise stated. For example, a 10% increase in unbilled revenue at 31 March 2015 would result in an increase in the income statement of £60m and a 10% decrease in unbilled revenue would have the equal but opposite effect.

 

    

      2015   2014 
      

Income
    statement

£m

  

Net  

      assets  

£m  

   

Income

    statement

£m

  

Net   

      assets   

£m   

 
  

 

 
  

One year average change in useful economic lives (pre-tax):

      
  

Depreciation charge on property, plant and equipment

   69    69       68    68    
  

Amortisation charge on intangible assets

   26    26       18    18    
 
  

Estimated future cash flows in respect of provisions, change of 10%(pre-tax)

   174    174       164    164    
 
  

Assets and liabilities carried at fair value change of 10% (pre-tax):

      
  

Derivative financial instruments1

   68    68       81    81    
  

Commodity contract liabilities

   11    11       4    4    
 
  

Pensions and other post-retirement benefits2 (pre-tax):

      
  

UK discount rate change of 0.5%3

   9    1,575       13    1,347    
  

US discount rate change of 0.5%3

   12    670       15    473    
  

UK RPI rate change of 0.5%4

   9    1,349       12    1,217    
  

UK long-term rate of increase in salaries change of 0.5%5

   1    93       5    95    
  

US long-term rate of increase in salaries change of 0.5%5

   2    42       4    39    
  

UK change of one year to life expectancy at age 65

   1    620       3    548    
  

US change of one year to life expectancy at age 65

   3    352       12    220    
  

Assumed US healthcare cost trend rates change of 1%

   28    465       28    355    
 
  

Unbilled revenue at 31 March change of 10% (post-tax)

   60    60       58    58    
  

No hedge accounting for our derivative financial instruments (post-tax)

   (611  316       350    (294)   
 
  

Commodity risk6 (post-tax):

      
  

10% increase in commodity prices

   26    26       50    50    
  

10% decrease in commodity prices

   (24  (24)      (33  (33)   
  

 

 
 
 

1. The effect of a 10% change in fair value assumes no hedge accounting.

2. The changes shown are a change in the annual pension or other post-retirement benefit service charge and change in the defined benefit obligations.

3. A change in the discount rate is likely to occur as a result of changes in bond yields and as such would be expected to be offset to a significant degree by a change in the value of the bond assets held by the plans.

4. The projected impact resulting from a change in RPI reflects the underlying effect on pensions in payment, pensions in deferment and resultant increases in salary assumptions.

5. This change has been applied to both the pre 1 April 2014 and post 1 April 2014 rate of increase in salary assumption.

6. Represents potential impact on fair values of commodity contracts only.

 

    

    

     

    

    

    

   2015 2014 
   Income
statement
£m
 Other  
equity  
reserves  
£m  
 Income
statement
£m
 Other   
equity   
reserves   
£m   
 
  

 

 
  

Financial risk (post-tax):

      
  

UK RPI change of 0.5%1

   27    –       26    –    
  

UK interest rates change of 0.5%

   92    101       93    68    
  

US interest rates change of 0.5%

   77    11       70    13    
  

US dollar exchange rate change of 10%2

   62    607       55    641    
  

 

 
 
 

1. Excludes sensitivities to LPI curve. Further details on sensitivities are provided in note 30(g).

2. The other equity reserves impact does not reflect the exchange translation in our US subsidiaries’ net assets. It is estimated this would change by £771m (2014: £781m) in the opposite direction if the dollar exchange rate changed by 10%.

 

    

     

LOGO

              NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15151          


      Financial Statements

   Notes to the consolidated financial statements

   – supplementary informationcontinued

    

    

    

32. Subsidiary undertakings, joint ventures and associatescontinued

Joint ventures

A list of the Group’s joint ventures as at 31 March 2016 is given below. All joint ventures are included in the Group’s financial statements using the equity method of accounting. Principal joint ventures are identified inbold.

 

Incorporated in England and Wales  33. Sensitivities on areas of estimation and uncertaintycontinuedIncorporated in the US
BritNed Development Limited(50%)Clean Energy Generation LLC (50%)
Joint Radio Company Limited (50%)Island Park Energy Center LLC (50%)
Nemo Link Limited (50%)Islander East Pipeline Company, L.L.C. (50%)
NGET/SPT Upgrades Limited (50%)LI Energy Storage System, LLC (50%)
St William Homes LLP (50%)LI Solar Generation LLC (50%)

Associates

A list of the Group’s associates as at 31 March 2016 is given below. All associates are included in the Group’s financial statements using the equity method of accounting.

Incorporated in the USIncorporated in Belgium
Algonquin Gas Transmission LLC (20%)Coreso SA (20%)
Clean Line Energy Partners LLC (32%)  
Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company (19.5%)  Pensions
Direct Global Power, Inc. (26%)
Energis plc (33.06%)
Energy Impact Fund LP (33%)
Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company (24%)
Millennium Pipeline Company LLC (26.25%)
New York Transco LLC (28.3%)
Nysearch RMLD LLC (22.63%)
Yankee Atomic Electric Company (34.5%)

Our interests and activities are held or operated through the subsidiaries, joint arrangements or associates as disclosed above. These interests and activities (and their branches) are established in – and subject to the laws and regulations of – these jurisdictions.

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements159


Notes to the consolidated financial statements

– supplementary information continued

33. Sensitivities on areas of estimation and uncertainty

In order to give a clearer picture of the impact on our results or financial position of potential changes in significant estimates and assumptions, the following sensitivities are presented. These sensitivities are hypothetical, as they are based on assumptions and conditions prevailing at the year end, and should be used with caution. The effects provided are not necessarily indicative of the actual effects that would be experienced because our actual exposures are constantly changing.

The sensitivities in the tables below show the potential impact in the income statement (and consequential impact on net assets) for a range of different variables each of which have been considered in isolation (i.e. with all other variables remaining constant). There are a number of these sensitivities which are mutually exclusive and therefore if one were to happen, another would not, meaning a total showing how sensitive our results are to these external factors is not meaningful.

We are further required to show additional sensitivity analysis for changes in interest and exchange rates and these are shown separately in the subsequent table due to the additional assumptions that are made in order to produce meaningful sensitivity disclosures.

The sensitivities included in the tables below all have an equal and opposite effect if the sensitivity increases or decreases by the same amount unless otherwise stated. For example, a 10% increase in unbilled revenue at 31 March 2016 would result in an increase in the income statement of £58m and a 10% decrease in unbilled revenue would have the equal but opposite effect.

  2016     2015  
   Income 
statement 
£m 
   Net
    assets
£m
     Income 
statement 
£m 
   Net
    assets
£m
 

One year average change in useful economic lives (pre-tax):

       

Depreciation charge on property, plant and equipment

  79      79     69      69  

Amortisation charge on intangible assets

  20      20     26      26  

Estimated future cash flows in respect of provisions, change of 10% (pre-tax)

  172      172     174      174  

Assets and liabilities carried at fair value change of 10% (pre-tax):

       

Derivative financial instruments1

  (11)     (11   68      68  

Commodity contract liabilities

  (10)     (10   11      11  

Pensions and other post-retirement benefits2 (pre-tax):

       

UK discount rate change of 0.5%3

  11      1,482          1,575  

US discount rate change of 0.5%3

  16      640     12      670  

UK RPI rate change of 0.5%4

       1,268          1,349  

UK long-term rate of increase in salaries change of 0.5%5

       87          93  

US long-term rate of increase in salaries change of 0.5%

       45          42  

UK change of one year to life expectancy at age 65

       703          620  

US change of one year to life expectancy at age 65

       295          352  

Assumed US healthcare cost trend rates change of 1%

  35      514     28      465  

Unbilled revenue at 31 March change of 10% (post-tax)

  58      58     60      60  

No hedge accounting for our derivative financial instruments (post-tax)

  (123)     36     (611)     316  

Commodity risk6 (post-tax):

       

10% increase in commodity prices

  22      22     26      26  

10% decrease in commodity prices

  (22)     (22    (24)     (24

1.The effect of a 10% change in fair value assumes no hedge accounting.
2.The changes shown are a change in the annual pension or other post-retirement benefits assumptionsbenefit service charge and change in the defined benefit obligations.
3.Sensitivities have been preparedA change in the discount rate is likely to show how the DB obligations and annual service costs could potentially be impacted byoccur as a result of changes in the relevant actuarial assumption that were reasonably possiblebond yields and as at 31 March 2015. In preparing sensitivities the potential impact has been calculatedsuch would be expected to be offset to a significant degree by applying thea change to each assumption in isolation and assuming all other assumptions remain unchanged. This is with the exception of RPI in the UK wherevalue of the correspondingbond assets held by the plans.
4.The projected impact resulting from a change to increases toin RPI reflects the underlying effect on pensions in payment, increases to pensions in deferment and resultant increases in salary assumptions.
5.This change has been applied to both the pre 1 April 2014 and post 1 April 2014 rate of increase in salary assumption.
6.Represents potential impact on fair values of commodity contracts only.

  2016    2015 
   Income
statement
£m
   Other
equity
reserves
£m
     Income
statement
£m
   Other
equity
reserves
£m
 

Financial risk (post-tax):

       

UK RPI change of 0.5%1

  31          27       

UK interest rates change of 0.5%

  76     85     92     101  

US interest rates change of 0.5%

  66     17     77     11  

US dollar exchange rate change of 10%2

  57     553      62     607  

1.Excludes sensitivities to LPI curve. Further details on sensitivities are provided in note 30(g).
2.The other equity reserves impact does not reflect the exchange translation in our US subsidiaries’ net assets. It is recognised.estimated this would change by £788m (2015: £771m) in the opposite direction if the dollar exchange rate changed by 10%.

160National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16 Financial instruments assumptionsStatements
Our financial instruments are sensitive to changes in market variables, being UK and US interest rates, the UK RPI and the dollar to sterling exchange rate. The changes in market variables impact the valuation of our borrowings, deposits, derivative financial instruments and commodity contracts. The analysis illustrates the sensitivity of our financial instruments to the changes in market variables.
 


 

   Financial Statements

33. Sensitivities on areas of estimation and uncertaintycontinued

Pensions and other post-retirement benefits assumptions

Sensitivities have been prepared to show how the DB obligations and annual service costs could potentially be impacted by changes in the relevant actuarial assumption that were reasonably possible as at 31 March 2016. In preparing sensitivities the potential impact has been calculated by applying the change to each assumption in isolation and assuming all other assumptions remain unchanged. This is with the exception of RPI in the UK where the corresponding change to increases to pensions in payment, increases to pensions in deferment and increases in salary is recognised.

Financial instruments assumptions

Our financial instruments are sensitive to changes in market variables, being UK and US interest rates, the UK RPI and the dollar to sterling exchange rate. The changes in market variables impact the valuation of our borrowings, deposits, derivative financial instruments and commodity contracts. The analysis illustrates the sensitivity of our financial instruments to the changes in market variables.

The following main assumptions were made in calculating the sensitivity analysis:

 

the amount of net debt, the ratio of fixed to floating interest rates of the debt and derivatives portfolio, and the proportion of financial instruments in foreign currencies are all constant and on the basis of the hedge designations in place at 31 March 2016 and 2015 and 2014 respectively;

the statement of financial position sensitivity to interest rates relates only to derivative financial instruments and available-for-sale investments, as debt and other deposits are carried at amortised cost and so their carrying value does not change as interest rates move;

the sensitivity of accrued interest to movements in interest rates is calculated on net floating rate exposures on debt, deposits and derivative instruments;

changes in the carrying value of derivatives from movements in interest rates of designated cash flow hedges are assumed to be recorded fully within equity; and

changes in the carrying value of derivative financial instruments designated as net investment hedges from movements in interest rates are recorded in the income statement as they are designated using the spot rather than the forward translation method. The impact of movements in the dollar to sterling exchange rate are recorded directly in equity.

34. Additional disclosures in respect of guaranteed securities

 

 

We have three debt issuances (including preferred shares) that are listed on a US national securities exchange and are guaranteed by other companies in the Group. These guarantors commit to honour any liabilities should the company issuing the debt have any financial difficulties. In order to provide debt holders with information on the financial stability of the companies providing the guarantees, we are required to disclose individual financial information for these companies. We have chosen to include this information in the Group financial statements rather than submitting separate stand-alone financial statements.

 

The following condensed consolidating financial information, comprising statements of comprehensive income, statements of financial position and cash flow statements, is given in respect of National Grid Gas plc (subsidiary guarantor), which became joint full and unconditional guarantor on 11 May 2004 with National Grid plc (parent guarantor) of the 6.625% Guaranteed Notes due 2018 issued in June 1998 by British Transco Finance Inc., then known as British Gas Finance Inc. (issuer of notes). Condensed consolidating financial information is also provided in respect of Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation as a result of National Grid plc’s guarantee, dated 29 October 2007, of Niagara Mohawk’s 3.6% and 3.9% issued preferred shares. National Grid Gas plc, British Transco Finance Inc., and Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation are wholly-owned subsidiaries of National Grid plc.

The following condensed consolidating financial information, comprising statements of comprehensive income, statements of financial position and cash flow statements, is given in respect of National Grid Gas plc (subsidiary guarantor), which became joint full and unconditional guarantor on 11 May 2004 with National Grid plc (parent guarantor) of the 6.625% Guaranteed Notes due 2018 issued in June 1998 by British Transco Finance Inc., then known as British Gas Finance Inc. (issuer of notes). Condensed consolidating financial information is also provided in respect of Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation as a result of National Grid plc’s guarantee, dated 29 October 2007, of Niagara Mohawk’s 3.6% and 3.9% issued preferred shares. National Grid Gas plc, British Transco Finance Inc., and Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation are 100% owned and National Grid plc’s guarantee of Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation’s preferred shares is full and unconditional pursuant to Rule 3-10(i)(8) (i) and (ii) of Regulation S-X. The guarantees of National Grid Gas plc and National Grid plc are joint and several.

The following financial information for National Grid plc, National Grid Gas plc, British Transco Finance Inc., and Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation on a condensed consolidating basis is intended to provide investors with meaningful and comparable financial information and is provided pursuant to various rules including Rule 3-10 of Regulation S-X in lieu of the separate financial statements of each subsidiary issuer of public debt securities.

This financial information should be read in conjunction with the other disclosure in these financial statements.

       152


  34. Additional disclosures in respect of guaranteed securitiescontinued  
 
  Summary statements of comprehensive income are presented, on a consolidated basis, for the three years ended 31 March 2015. Summary statements of comprehensive income of National Grid plc and National Grid Gas plc are presented under IFRS measurement principles, as modified by the inclusion of the results of subsidiary undertakings on the basis of equity accounting principles.     
 
  The summary statements of financial position of National Grid plc and National Grid Gas plc include the investments in subsidiaries recorded on the basis of equity accounting principles for the purposes of presenting condensed consolidating financial information under IFRS. The summary statements of financial position present these investments within non-current financial and other investments.     
 
  The consolidation adjustments column includes the necessary amounts to eliminate the intercompany balances and transactions between National Grid plc, National Grid Gas plc, British Transco Finance Inc., Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation and other subsidiaries.    
 
  

Summary statements of comprehensive income for the year ended 31 March 2015 – IFRS

 

  

      Parent    
    guarantor    
     Issuer of notes         Subsidiary    
guarantor    
     

 

 
      

National    
Grid plc    

£m    

     Niagara
Mohawk
Power
Corporation
£m
     British
Transco
Finance Inc.
£m
     

National    
Grid Gas    
plc    

£m    

     Other
subsidiaries
£m
     Consolidation
adjustments
£m
     National   
Grid   
consolidated   
£m   
 
  

 

 
  

Revenue

   –         2,109            3,136         10,125      (169    15,201    
  

Operating costs:

                    
  

Depreciation and amortisation

   –         (146          (540)        (796          (1,482)   
  

Payroll costs

   –         (256          (253)        (950          (1,459)   
  

Purchases of electricity

   –         (604          –         (1,081          (1,685)   
  

Purchases of gas

   –         (147          (98)        (1,171          (1,416)   
  

Rates and property tax

   –         (146          (247)        (611          (1,004)   
  

Balancing Service Incentive Scheme

   –                     –         (874          (874)   
  

Payments to other UK network owners

   –                     –         (801          (801)   
  

Other operating costs

   –         (501          (655)        (1,713    169      (2,700)   
 
     –         (1,800          (1,793)        (7,997    169      (11,421)   
  

 

 
  

Total operating profit

   –         309            1,343         2,128            3,780    
  

Net finance costs

   (223)        (76          (352)        (547          (1,198)   
  

Dividends receivable

   –                     –         700      (700    –     
  

Interest in equity accounted affiliates

   2,192                     8         46      (2,200    46    
  

 

 
  

Profit before tax

   1,969         233            999         2,327      (2,900    2,628    
  

Tax

   50         (98          (230)        (339          (617)   
  

 

 
  

Profit for the year

   2,019         135      1     769         1,988      (2,900    2,011    
  

Amounts recognised in other comprehensive income2

   (395)        1            22         (588    566      (394)   
  

 

 
  

Total comprehensive income for the year

   1,624         136            791         1,400      (2,334    1,617    
  

 

 
  

Attributable to:

                    
  

Equity shareholders

   1,624         136            791         1,407      (2,334    1,624    
  

Non-controlling interests

   –                     –         (7          (7)   
  

 

 
     1,624         136            791         1,400      (2,334    1,617    
  

 

 
 
 

1. Profit for the year for British Transco Finance Inc. is £nil as interest payable to external bond holders is offset by interest receivable on loans to National Grid Gas plc.

2. Includes other comprehensive income relating to interest in equity accounted affiliates.

 

    

    

LOGO

          NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15153           


      Financial Statements

   Notes to the consolidated financial statements of each subsidiary issuer of public debt securities.

   – supplementaryThis financial informationcontinued

should be read in conjunction with the other disclosure in these financial statements.

  34. Additional disclosures in respect of guaranteed securitiescontinued  
 
  Summary statements of comprehensive income for the year ended 31 March 2014 – IFRS  
 
      Parent    
    guarantor    
     Issuer of notes         Subsidiary     
guarantor     
     

 

 
     
 

 

National    
Grid plc    

£m    

  
  

  

    
 
 
 
 
Niagara
Mohawk
Power
Corporation
£m
  
  
  
  
  
    
 
 
 
British
Transco
Finance Inc.
£m
  
  
  
  
    
 
 

 

National     
Grid Gas     
plc     

£m     

  
  
  

  

    
 

 

Other
subsidiaries

£m

  
1  

  

    
 
 
Consolidation
adjustments
£m
  
  
  
    
 
 
 
National   
Grid   
consolidated1 
£m   
  
  
  
  
  

 

 
  

Revenue

   4         2,185            3,141         9,653      (174    14,809    
  

Operating costs:

                    
  

Depreciation and amortisation

   –         (127          (529)        (760          (1,416)   
  

Payroll costs

   –         (278          (251)        (689          (1,218)   
  

Purchases of electricity

   –         (647          –         (817          (1,464)   
  

Purchases of gas

   –         (194          (112)        (1,449          (1,755)   
  

Rates and property tax

   –         (137          (241)        (585          (963)   
  

Balancing Service Incentive Scheme

   –                     –         (872          (872)   
  

Payments to other UK network owners

   –                     –         (630          (630)   
  

Other operating costs

   15         (440          (661)        (1,844    174      (2,756)   
     15         (1,823          (1,794)        (7,646    174      (11,074)   
  

 

 
  

Total operating profit

   19         362            1,347         2,007            3,735    
  

Net finance costs

   (128)        (85          (285)        (517          (1,015)   
  

Dividends receivable

   –                     –         600      (600    –    
  

Interest in equity accounted affiliates

   2,550                     11         28      (2,561    28    
  

 

 
  

Profit before tax

   2,441         277            1,073         2,118      (3,161    2,748    
  

Tax

   35         (97          3         (225          (284)   
  

 

 
  

Profit for the year

   2,476         180      2     1,076         1,893      (3,161    2,464    
  

Amounts recognised in other comprehensive income3

   235         (8          9         383      (384    235    
  

 

 
  

Total comprehensive income for the year

   2,711         172            1,085         2,276      (3,545    2,699    
  

 

 
  

Attributable to:

                    
  

Equity shareholders

   2,711         172            1,085         2,288      (3,545    2,711    
  

Non-controlling interests

   –                     –         (12          (12)   
  

 

 
     2,711         172            1,085         2,276      (3,545    2,699    
  

 

 
 
 

1. Comparatives have been represented on a basis consistent with the current year presentation.

2. Profit for the year for British Transco Finance Inc. is £nil as interest payable to external bond holders is offset by interest receivable on loans to National Grid Gas plc.

3. Includes other comprehensive income relating to interest in equity accounted affiliates.

 

    

    

    

       154


Summary statements of comprehensive income are presented, on a consolidated basis, for the three years ended 31 March 2016. Summary statements of comprehensive income of National Grid plc and National Grid Gas plc are presented under IFRS measurement principles, as modified by the inclusion of the results of subsidiary undertakings on the basis of equity accounting principles.

  34. Additional disclosures in respect of guaranteed securitiescontinued  
 
  Summary statements of comprehensive income for the year ended 31 March 2013 – IFRS  
 
      Parent    
    guarantor    
     Issuer of notes         Subsidiary     
guarantor     
     

 

 
     
 

 

National    
Grid plc    

£m    

  
  

  

    
 
 
 
 
Niagara
Mohawk
Power
Corporation
£m
  
  
  
  
  
    
 
 
 
British
Transco
Finance Inc.
£m
  
  
  
  
    
 
 

 

National     
Grid Gas     
plc     

£m     

  
  
  

  

    
 

 

Other
subsidiaries

£m

  
1  

  

    
 
 
Consolidation
adjustments
£m
  
  
  
    
 
 
 
National   
Grid   
consolidated1 
£m   
  
  
  
  
  

 

 
  

Revenue

   –         2,129            3,062         9,345      (177    14,359    
  

Operating costs:

                    
  

Depreciation and amortisation

   –         (119          (511)        (731          (1,361)   
  

Payroll costs

   –         (276          (238)        (946          (1,460)   
  

Purchases of electricity

   –         (561          –         (579          (1,140)   
  

Purchases of gas

   –         (151          (128)        (1,036          (1,315)   
  

Rates and property tax

   –         (141          (235)        (593          (969)   
  

Balancing Service Incentive Scheme

   –                     –         (805          (805)   
  

Payments to other UK network owners

   –                     –         (487          (487)   
  

Other operating costs

   –         (357          (579)        (2,314    177      (3,073)   
     –         (1,605          (1,691)        (7,491    177      (10,610)   
  

 

 
  

Total operating profit

   –         524            1,371         1,854            3,749    
  

Net finance costs

   (181)        (88          (274)        (513          (1,056)   
  

Dividends receivable

   –                     –         1,900      (1,900    –    
  

Interest in equity accounted affiliates

   2,295                     8         18      (2,303    18    
  

 

 
  

Profit before tax

   2,114         436            1,105         3,259      (4,203    2,711    
  

Tax

   39         (168          (174)        (254          (557)   
  

 

 
  

Profit for the year

   2,153         268      2     931         3,005      (4,203    2,154    
  

Amounts recognised in other comprehensive income3

   (381)        (35          3         (353    385      (381)   
  

 

 
  

Total comprehensive income for the year

   1,772         233            934         2,652      (3,818    1,773    
  

 

 
  

Attributable to:

                    
  

Equity shareholders

   1,772         233            934         2,651      (3,818    1,772    
  

Non-controlling interests

   –                     –         1            1    
  

 

 
     1,772         233            934         2,652      (3,818    1,773    
  

 

 
 
 

1. Comparatives have been represented on a basis consistent with the current year presentation.

2. Profit for the year for British Transco Finance Inc. is £nil as interest payable to external bond holders is offset by interest receivable on loans to National Grid Gas plc.

3. Includes other comprehensive income relating to interest in equity accounted affiliates.

 

    

    

    

LOGO

          NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15155   


        Financial StatementsThe summary statements of financial position of National Grid plc and National Grid Gas plc include the investments in subsidiaries recorded on the basis of equity accounting principles for the purposes of presenting condensed consolidating financial information under IFRS. The summary statements of financial position present these investments within non-current financial and other investments.

    NotesThe consolidation adjustments column includes the necessary amounts to eliminate the consolidated financial statementsintercompany balances and transactions between National Grid plc, National Grid Gas plc, British Transco Finance Inc., Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation and other subsidiaries.

    – supplementary informationcontinued

  34. Additional disclosures in respect of guaranteed securitiescontinued
  

 

Statements of financial position as at 31 March 2015 – IFRS

 
      Parent    
    guarantor    
   Issuer of notes      Subsidiary    
guarantor    
   

 

      

National    

Grid plc    

£m    

   

Niagara    

Mohawk    

Power    

  Corporation    

£m    

   

British    

Transco    

Finance Inc.    

£m    

   

National    

Grid Gas    

plc    

£m    

   

Other    

  subsidiaries    

£m    

   

Consolidation

adjustments

£m

  

National    

Grid    

consolidated    

£m    

  

 

  Non-current assets             
  Goodwill   –        653        –        –        4,492           5,145   
  Other intangible assets   –        –        –        232        570           802   
  Property, plant and equipment   –        5,025        –        12,428        23,270           40,723   
  Other non-current assets   –        11        –        18        51           80   
  Amounts owed by subsidiary undertakings   341        –        202        5,609        3,017        (9,169 –   
  Pension assets   –        121        –        –        –           121   
  Financial and other investments   14,988        26        –        56        9,905        (24,327 648   
  Derivative financial assets   148        –        –        988        403           1,539   
  

 

  Total non-current assets   15,477        5,836        202        19,331        41,708        (33,496 49,058   
  

 

  Current assets             
  Inventories and current intangible assets   –        40        –        26        274           340   
  Trade and other receivables   2        502        –        417        1,915           2,836   
  Amounts owed by subsidiary undertakings   11,484        254        5        298        13,052        (25,093 –   
  Financial and other investments   740        9        –        363        1,447           2,559   
  Derivative financial assets   281        –        –        70        88        (262 177   
  Cash and cash equivalents   10        11        –        4        104        (10 119   
  

 

  Total current assets   12,517        816        5        1,178        16,880        (25,365 6,031   
  

 

  Total assets   27,994        6,652        207        20,509        58,588        (58,861 55,089   
  

 

  Current liabilities             
  Borrowings   (1,068)       (44)       (5)       (521)       (1,400)       10   (3,028)  
  Derivative financial liabilities   (289)       –        –        (133)       (475)       262   (635)  
  Trade and other payables   (39)       (267)       –        (877)       (2,109)          (3,292)  
  Amounts owed to subsidiary undertakings   (11,208)       –        –        (1,973)       (11,912)       25,093   –   
  Current tax liabilities   (3)       (61)       –        (34)       (86)          (184)  
  Provisions   –        –        –        (39)       (196)          (235)  
  

 

  Total current liabilities   (12,607)       (372)       (5)       (3,577)       (16,178)       25,365   (7,374)  
  

 

  Non-current liabilities             
  Borrowings   (1,117)       (2,021)       (202)       (6,056)       (13,486)          (22,882)  
  Derivative financial liabilities   (411)       –        –        (481)       (872)          (1,764)  
  Other non-current liabilities   –        (287)       –        (1,038)       (594)          (1,919)  
  Amounts owed to subsidiary undertakings   (1,894)       –        –        (1,123)       (6,152)       9,169   –   
  Deferred tax liabilities   (3)       (782)       –        (1,655)       (1,857)          (4,297)  
  Pensions and other post-retirement benefit obligations   –        (801)       –        –        (2,578)          (3,379)  
  Provisions   –        (267)       –        (168)       (1,065)          (1,500)  
  

 

  Total non-current liabilities   (3,425)       (4,158)       (202)       (10,521)       (26,604)       9,169   (35,741)  
  

 

  Total liabilities   (16,032)       (4,530)       (207)       (14,098)       (42,782)       34,534   (43,115)  
  

 

  Net assets   11,962        2,122        –        6,411        15,806        (24,327 11,974   
  

 

  Equity             
  Share capital   443        126        –        45        182        (353 443   
  Share premium account   1,331        2,039        –        204        8,033        (10,276 1,331   
  Retained earnings   14,870        (43)       –        4,885        7,761        (12,603 14,870   
  Other equity reserves   (4,682)       –        –        1,277        (182)       (1,095 (4,682)  
  

 

  Shareholders’ equity   11,962        2,122        –        6,411        15,794        (24,327 11,962   
  Non-controlling interests   –        –        –        –        12           12   
  

 

  Total equity   11,962        2,122        –        6,411        15,806        (24,327 11,974   
  

 

       156


   34. Additional disclosures in respect of guaranteed securitiescontinued
 
   Statements of financial position as at 31 March 2014 – IFRS
 
      Parent    
    guarantor    
   Issuer of notes       Subsidiary    
guarantor    
   

 

      

National    

Grid plc    

£m    

   

Niagara    
Mohawk    

Power    
  Corporation    

£m    

   

British    

Transco    
Finance Inc.    

£m    

   

National    

Grid Gas    

plc    

£m    

   

Other    
  subsidiaries    

£m    

   

Consolidation
adjustments

£m

  

National    

Grid    
consolidated    

£m    

  

 

  Non-current assets             
  Goodwill   –        581        –        –        4,013           4,594   
  Other intangible assets   –        –        –        230        439           669   
  Property, plant and equipment   –        4,266        –        12,259        20,654           37,179   
  Other non-current assets   –        26        –        15        46           87   
  Amounts owed by subsidiary undertakings   305        –        180        5,609        2,676        (8,770 –   
  Pension assets   –        –        –        –        174           174   
  Financial and other investments   14,520        22        –        50        9,896        (23,853 635   
  Derivative financial assets   643        –        –        642        272           1,557   
  

 

  Total non-current assets   15,468        4,895        180        18,805        38,170        (32,623 44,895   
  

 

  Current assets             
  Inventories and current intangible assets   –        27        –        24        217           268   
  Trade and other receivables   3        572        –        361        1,855        64   2,855   
  Amounts owed by subsidiary undertakings   9,025        11        5        262        11,100        (20,403 –   
  Financial and other investments   1,481        10        –        420        1,688           3,599   
  Derivative financial assets   284        –        –        63        174        (108 413   
  Cash and cash equivalents   24        16        –        –        314           354   
  

 

  Total current assets   10,817        636        5        1,130        15,348        (20,447 7,489   
  

 

  Total assets   26,285        5,531        185        19,935        53,518        (53,070 52,384   
  

 

  Current liabilities             
  Borrowings   (1,327)       (328)       (4)       (568)       (1,284)          (3,511)  
  Derivative financial liabilities   (286)       –        –        (99)       (62)       108   (339)  
  Trade and other payables   (37)       (252)       –        (809)       (1,933)          (3,031)  
  Amounts owed to subsidiary undertakings   (8,695)       (56)       –        (2,212)       (9,440)       20,403   –   
  Current tax liabilities   –        (64)       –        (27)       (13)       (64 (168)  
  Provisions   –        –        –        (74)       (208)          (282)  
  

 

  Total current liabilities   (10,345)       (700)       (4)       (3,789)       (12,940)       20,447   (7,331)  
  

 

  Non-current liabilities             
  Borrowings   (1,850)       (1,321)       (180)       (6,048)       (13,040)          (22,439)  
  Derivative financial liabilities   (154)       –        –        (279)       (391)          (824)  
  Other non-current liabilities   –        (245)       –        (1,045)       (551)          (1,841)  
  Amounts owed to subsidiary undertakings   (2,022)       –        –        (654)       (6,094)       8,770   –   
  Deferred tax liabilities   (3)       (609)       –        (1,601)       (1,869)          (4,082)  
  Pensions and other post-retirement benefit obligations   –        (652)       –        –        (1,933)          (2,585)  
  Provisions   –        (243)       –        (158)       (962)          (1,363)  
  

 

  Total non-current liabilities   (4,029)       (3,070)       (180)       (9,785)       (24,840)       8,770   (33,134)  
  

 

  Total liabilities   (14,374)       (3,770)       (184)       (13,574)       (37,780)       29,217   (40,465)  
  

 

  Net assets   11,911        1,761        1        6,361        15,738        (23,853 11,919   
  

 

  Equity             
  Share capital   439        112        –        45        182        (339 439   
  Share premium account   1,336        1,808        –        204        8,032        (10,044 1,336   
  Retained earnings   14,895        (159)       1        4,814        7,628        (12,284 14,895   
  Other equity reserves   (4,759)       –        –        1,298        (112)       (1,186 (4,759)  
  

 

  Shareholders’ equity   11,911        1,761        1        6,361        15,730        (23,853 11,911   
  Non-controlling interests   –        –        –        –        8           8   
  

 

  Total equity   11,911        1,761        1        6,361        15,738        (23,853 11,919   
  

 

LOGO

NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15157


        Financial Statements

    Notes to the consolidated financial statements

    – supplementary informationcontinued

  34. Additional disclosures in respect of guaranteed securitiescontinued   
  

 

Cash flow statements

       
     Parent   
   guarantor   
  Issuer of notes     Subsidiary   
guarantor   
  

 

     National   
Grid plc   
£m   
  Niagara
Mohawk
Power
 Corporation
£m
  British  
Transco  
Finance Inc.  
£m  
  

National   
Grid Gas   
plc   

£m   

  Other
 subsidiaries
£m
  Consolidation
adjustments
£m
  National  
Grid  
consolidated  
£m  
  

 

  

Year ended 31 March 2015

       
  

Net cash flow from operating activities

  38       531    –      1,575       2,863       5,007  
  

Net cash flow from/(used in) investing activities

  2,103       (393  –      (603)      (1,051  (2,057 (2,001) 
  

Net cash flow (used in)/from financing activities

  (2,169)      (145  –      (959)      (2,037  2,057   (3,253) 
  

 

  

Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents in the year

  (28)      (7  –      13       (225     (247) 
  

 

  

Year ended 31 March 2014

       
  

Net cash flow from operating activities

  52       581    –      1,717       1,669       4,019  
  

Net cash flow from/(used in) investing activities

  1,358       (555  –      (91)      (993  (1,049 (1,330) 
  

Net cash flow (used in)/from financing activities

  (1,724)      (18  –      (1,632)      (647  1,049   (2,972) 
  

 

  

Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents in the year

  (314)      8    –      (6)      29       (283) 
  

 

  

Year ended 31 March 2013

       
  

Net cash flow from operating activities

  36       162    –      1,608       1,944       3,750  
  

Net cash flow used in investing activities

  (979)      (286  –      (1,345)      (1,048  (2,472 (6,130) 
  

Net cash flow from/(used in) financing activities

  1,255       132    –      (240)      (904  2,472   2,715  
  

 

  

Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents in the year

  312       8    –      23       (8     335  
  

 

 
  Cash dividends were received by National Grid plc from subsidiary undertakings amounting to £1,355m during the year ended 31 March 2015 (2014: £1,050m; 2013: £570m).
 
  Maturity analysis of parent Company borrowings
                        
                    

2015   

£m   

  

2014   

£m   

  

 

  

Total borrowings are repayable as follows:

       
  

Less than 1 year

       1,068     1,327  
  

In 1 to 2 years

       –     46  
  

In 2 to 3 years

       –     580  
  

In 3 to 4 years

       443     –  
  

In 4 to 5 years

       360     506  
  

More than 5 years

       314     718  
  

 

         2,185     3,177  
  

 

     158


Company accounting policies

 

 National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements161


Notes to the consolidated financial statements

– supplementary information continued

34. Additional disclosures in respect of guaranteed securitiescontinued

Summary statements of comprehensive income for the year ended 31 March 2016 – IFRS

   Parent
    guarantor    
     Issuer of notes       Subsidiary  
guarantor
                   
    

National

Grid plc

£m

      

Niagara

Mohawk

Power

Corporation

£m

      

British

Transco

Finance Inc.

£m

      

National

    Grid Gas

plc

£m

      

Other

subsidiaries

£m

      

Consolidation

adjustments

£m

      

National

Grid

consolidated

£m

 

Revenue

         2,027            3,165      10,104      (181    15,115  

Operating costs:

                    

Depreciation and amortisation

         (162          (553    (899          (1,614

Payroll costs

         (260          (269    (977          (1,506

Purchases of electricity

         (484                (828          (1,312

Purchases of gas

         (86          (92    (806          (984

Rates and property tax

         (155          (252    (643          (1,050

Balancing Service Incentive Scheme

                           (907          (907

Payments to other UK network owners

                           (971          (971

Other operating costs

         (433          (605    (1,829    181      (2,686
           (1,580            (1,771     (7,860     181       (11,030

Total operating profit

         447            1,394      2,244            4,085  

Net finance income/(costs)

   701      (87          (242    (1,484          (1,112

Dividends receivable

                           620      (620      

Interest in equity accounted affiliates

   1,843                     33       59       (1,876     59  

Profit before tax

   2,544      360            1,185      1,439      (2,496    3,032  

Tax

   47       (141            (80     (264            (438

Profit for the year

   2,591      219      1     1,105      1,175      (2,496    2,594  

Amounts recognised in other comprehensive income2

   573       (1            (5     509       (503     573  

Total comprehensive income for the year

   3,164       218              1,100       1,684       (2,999     3,167  

Attributable to:

                    

Equity shareholders

   3,164      218            1,100      1,681      (2,999    3,164  

Non-controlling interests

                               3              3  
    3,164       218              1,100       1,684       (2,999     3,167  

1. Profit for the year for British Transco Finance Inc. is £nil as interest payable to external bond holders is offset by interest receivable on loans to National Grid Gas plc.

2. Includes other comprehensive income relating to interest in equity accounted affiliates.

162National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements


   Financial Statements

34. Additional disclosures in respect of guaranteed securitiescontinued

Summary statements of comprehensive income for the year ended 31 March 2015 – IFRS

       Parent    
    guarantor    
     Issuer of notes       Subsidiary  
  guarantor  
                   
    

National

Grid plc

£m

      Niagara
Mohawk
Power
Corporation
£m
      British
Transco
Finance Inc.
£m
      

National
Grid Gas

plc

£m

      Other
subsidiaries
£m
      Consolidation
adjustments
£m
      National
Grid
consolidated
£m
 

Revenue

         2,109            3,136      10,125      (169    15,201  

Operating costs:

                    

Depreciation and amortisation

         (146          (540    (796          (1,482

Payroll costs

         (256          (253    (950          (1,459

Purchases of electricity

         (604                (1,081          (1,685

Purchases of gas

         (147          (98    (1,171          (1,416

Rates and property tax

         (146          (247    (611          (1,004

Balancing Service Incentive Scheme

                           (874          (874

Payments to other UK network owners

                           (801          (801

Other operating costs

         (501          (655    (1,713    169      (2,700
           (1,800            (1,793     (7,997     169       (11,421

Total operating profit

         309            1,343      2,128            3,780  

Net finance costs

   (223    (76          (352    (547          (1,198

Dividends receivable

                           700      (700      

Interest in equity accounted affiliates

   2,192                     8       46       (2,200     46  

Profit before tax

   1,969      233            999      2,327      (2,900    2,628  

Tax

   50       (98            (230     (339            (617

Profit for the year

   2,019      135      1     769      1,988      (2,900    2,011  

Amounts recognised in other comprehensive income2

   (395     1              22       (588     566       (394

Total comprehensive income for the year

   1,624       136              791       1,400       (2,334     1,617  

Attributable to:

                    

Equity shareholders

   1,624      136            791      1,407      (2,334    1,624  

Non-controlling interests

                               (7            (7
    1,624       136              791       1,400       (2,334     1,617  

1.  Profit for the year for British Transco Finance Inc. is £nil as interest payable to external bond holders is offset by interest receivable on loans to National Grid Gas plc.

2.  Includes other comprehensive income relating to interest in equity accounted affiliates.

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements163


Notes to the consolidated financial statements

– supplementary information continued

34. Additional disclosures in respect of guaranteed securitiescontinued

Summary statements of comprehensive income for the year ended 31 March 2014 – IFRS

       Parent    
    guarantor    
     Issuer of notes       Subsidiary  
  guarantor  
                   
    

National

Grid plc

£m

      Niagara
Mohawk
Power
Corporation
£m
      British
Transco
Finance Inc.
£m
      

National
Grid Gas

plc

£m

      Other
subsidiaries
£m
      Consolidation
adjustments
£m
      National
Grid
consolidated
£m
 

Revenue

   4      2,185            3,141      9,653      (174    14,809  

Operating costs:

                    

Depreciation and amortisation

         (127          (529    (760          (1,416

Payroll costs

         (278          (251    (689          (1,218

Purchases of electricity

         (647                (817          (1,464

Purchases of gas

         (194          (112    (1,449          (1,755

Rates and property tax

         (137          (241    (585          (963

Balancing Service Incentive Scheme

                           (872          (872

Payments to other UK network owners

                           (630          (630

Other operating costs

   15      (440          (661    (1,844    174      (2,756
    15       (1,823            (1,794     (7,646     174       (11,074

Total operating profit

   19      362            1,347      2,007            3,735  

Net finance costs

   (128    (85          (285    (517          (1,015

Dividends receivable

                           600      (600      

Interest in equity accounted affiliates

   2,550                     11       28       (2,561     28  

Profit before tax

   2,441      277            1,073      2,118      (3,161    2,748  

Tax

   35       (97            3       (225            (284

Profit for the year

   2,476      180      1     1,076      1,893      (3,161    2,464  

Amounts recognised in other comprehensive income2

   235       (8            9       383       (384     235  

Total comprehensive income for the year

   2,711       172              1,085       2,276       (3,545     2,699  

Attributable to:

                    

Equity shareholders

   2,711      172            1,085      2,288      (3,545    2,711  

Non-controlling interests

                               (12            (12
    2,711       172              1,085       2,276       (3,545     2,699  

1.  Profit for the year for British Transco Finance Inc. is £nil as interest payable to external bond holders is offset by interest receivable on loans to National Grid Gas plc.

2.  Includes other comprehensive income relating to interest in equity accounted affiliates.

164National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements


   Financial Statements

34. Additional disclosures in respect of guaranteed securitiescontinued

Statements of financial position as at 31 March 2016 – IFRS

       Parent    
    guarantor    
     Issuer of notes       Subsidiary  
  guarantor  
                   
    

National

Grid plc

£m

      Niagara
Mohawk
Power
Corporation
£m
      

British
Transco
Finance Inc.

£m

      

National
Grid Gas

plc

£m

      Other
subsidiaries
£m
      Consolidation
adjustments
£m
      National
Grid
consolidated
£m
 

Non-current assets

                    

Goodwill

         664                  4,651            5,315  

Other intangible assets

                     239      648            887  

Property, plant and equipment

         5,466            12,628      25,270            43,364  

Other non-current assets

         7            41      34            82  

Amounts owed by subsidiary undertakings

   318            209      5,609      2,630      (8,766      

Pension assets

         125                  285            410  

Financial and other investments

   17,428      26            86      10,131      (26,792    879  

Derivative financial assets

   157                     1,014       514              1,685  

Total non-current assets

   17,903       6,288       209       19,617       44,163       (35,558     52,622  

Current assets

                    

Inventories and current intangible assets

         42            26      369            437  

Trade and other receivables

   1      413            432      1,626            2,472  

Amounts owed by subsidiary undertakings

   11,516      300      6      57      12,785      (24,664      

Financial and other investments

   1,244      28            116      1,610            2,998  

Derivative financial assets

   279                  66      131      (198    278  

Cash and cash equivalents

   1       4                     126       (4     127  

Total current assets

   13,041       787       6       697       16,647       (24,866     6,312  

Total assets

   30,944       7,075       215       20,314       60,810       (60,424     58,934  

Current liabilities

                    

Borrowings

   (933    (47    (5    (602    (2,028    4      (3,611

Derivative financial liabilities

   (239                (39    (257    198      (337

Trade and other payables

   (43    (248          (661    (2,333          (3,285

Amounts owed to subsidiary undertakings

   (12,633                (1,518    (10,513    24,664        

Current tax liabilities

   (3    (61          (34    (154          (252

Provisions

                        (55     (181            (236

Total current liabilities

   (13,851     (356     (5     (2,909     (15,466     24,866       (7,721

Non-current liabilities

                    

Borrowings

   (1,194    (2,043    (209    (6,078    (15,209          (24,733

Derivative financial liabilities

   (358                (527    (847          (1,732

Other non-current liabilities

         (297          (1,031    (743          (2,071

Amounts owed to subsidiary undertakings

   (1,982                (1,174    (5,610    8,766        

Deferred tax liabilities

   (4    (939          (1,548    (2,143          (4,634

Pensions and other post-retirement benefit obligations

         (761                (2,234          (2,995

Provisions

          (250            (126     (1,107            (1,483

Total non-current liabilities

   (3,538     (4,290     (209     (10,484     (27,893     8,766       (37,648

Total liabilities

   (17,389     (4,646     (214     (13,393     (43,359     33,632       (45,369

Net assets

   13,555       2,429       1       6,921       17,451       (26,792     13,565  

Equity

                    

Share capital

   447      130            45      182      (357    447  

Share premium account

   1,326      2,119            204      8,033      (10,356    1,326  

Retained earnings

   16,305      180      1      5,400      9,316      (14,897    16,305  

Other equity reserves

   (4,523                   1,272       (90     (1,182     (4,523

Shareholders’ equity

   13,555      2,429      1      6,921      17,441      (26,792    13,555  

Non-controlling interests

                               10              10  

Total equity

   13,555       2,429       1       6,921       17,451       (26,792     13,565  

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements165


Notes to the consolidated financial statements

– supplementary information continued

34. Additional disclosures in respect of guaranteed securitiescontinued

Statements of financial position as at 31 March 2015 – IFRS

   Parent
  guarantor  
     Issuer of notes       Subsidiary  
  guarantor  
                   
    

National

Grid plc

£m

      Niagara
Mohawk
Power
Corporation
£m
      British
Transco
Finance Inc.
£m
      

National
Grid Gas

plc

£m

      Other
subsidiaries
£m
      Consolidation
adjustments
£m
      National
Grid
consolidated
£m
 

Non-current assets

                    

Goodwill

         653                  4,492            5,145  

Other intangible assets

                     232      570            802  

Property, plant and equipment

         5,025            12,428      23,270            40,723  

Other non-current assets

         11            18      51            80  

Amounts owed by subsidiary undertakings

   341            202      5,609      3,017      (9,169      

Pension assets

         121                              121  

Financial and other investments

   14,988      26            56      9,905      (24,327    648  

Derivative financial assets

   148                     988       403              1,539  

Total non-current assets

   15,477       5,836       202       19,331       41,708       (33,496     49,058  

Current assets

                    

Inventories and current intangible assets

         40            26      274            340  

Trade and other receivables

   2      502            417      1,915            2,836  

Amounts owed by subsidiary undertakings

   11,484      254      5      298      13,052      (25,093      

Financial and other investments

   740      9            363      1,447            2,559  

Derivative financial assets

   281                  70      88      (262    177  

Cash and cash equivalents

   10       11              4       104       (10     119  

Total current assets

   12,517       816       5       1,178       16,880       (25,365     6,031  

Total assets

   27,994       6,652       207       20,509       58,588       (58,861     55,089  

Current liabilities

                    

Borrowings

   (1,068    (44    (5    (521    (1,400    10      (3,028

Derivative financial liabilities

   (289                (133    (475    262      (635

Trade and other payables

   (39    (267          (877    (2,109          (3,292

Amounts owed to subsidiary undertakings

   (11,208                (1,973    (11,912    25,093        

Current tax liabilities

   (3    (61          (34    (86          (184

Provisions

                        (39     (196            (235

Total current liabilities

   (12,607     (372     (5     (3,577     (16,178     25,365       (7,374

Non-current liabilities

                    

Borrowings

   (1,117    (2,021    (202    (6,056    (13,486          (22,882

Derivative financial liabilities

   (411                (481    (872          (1,764

Other non-current liabilities

         (287          (1,038    (594          (1,919

Amounts owed to subsidiary undertakings

   (1,894                (1,123    (6,152    9,169        

Deferred tax liabilities

   (3    (782          (1,655    (1,857          (4,297

Pensions and other post-retirement benefit obligations

         (801                (2,578          (3,379

Provisions

          (267            (168     (1,065            (1,500

Total non-current liabilities

   (3,425     (4,158     (202     (10,521     (26,604     9,169       (35,741

Total liabilities

   (16,032     (4,530     (207     (14,098     (42,782     34,534       (43,115

Net assets

   11,962       2,122              6,411       15,806       (24,327     11,974  

Equity

                    

Share capital

   443      126            45      182      (353    443  

Share premium account

   1,331      2,039            204      8,033      (10,276    1,331  

Retained earnings

   14,870      (43          4,885      7,761      (12,603    14,870  

Other equity reserves

   (4,682                   1,277       (182     (1,095     (4,682

Shareholders’ equity

   11,962      2,122            6,411      15,794      (24,327    11,962  

Non-controlling interests

                               12              12  

Total equity

   11,962       2,122              6,411       15,806       (24,327     11,974  

166National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements


   Financial Statements

34. Additional disclosures in respect of guaranteed securitiescontinued

Cash flow statements

   Parent
  guarantor  
     Issuer of notes       Subsidiary  
guarantor
                   
    

National

Grid plc

£m

      Niagara
Mohawk
Power
Corporation
£m
      British
Transco
Finance Inc.
£m
      

National
Grid Gas

plc

£m

      Other
subsidiaries
£m
      

Consolidation

adjustments
£m

      National
Grid
consolidated
£m
 

Year ended 31 March 2016

                    

Net cash flow from operating activities

   57      580            1,743      2,988            5,368  

Net cash flow from/(used in) investing activities

   502      (440    13      (506    (1,736    (1,869    (4,036

Net cash flow (used in)/from financing activities

   (555    (148    (13    (1,248    (1,233    1,869      (1,328

Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents in the year

   4       (8            (11     19              4  

Year ended 31 March 2015

                    

Net cash flow from operating activities

   38      531            1,575      2,863            5,007  

Net cash flow from/(used in) investing activities

   2,103      (393          (603    (1,051    (2,057    (2,001

Net cash flow (used in)/from financing activities

   (2,169    (145          (959    (2,037    2,057      (3,253

Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents in the year

   (28     (7            13       (225            (247

Year ended 31 March 2014

                    

Net cash flow from operating activities

   52      581            1,717      1,669            4,019  

Net cash flow from/(used in) investing activities

   1,358      (555          (91    (993    (1,049    (1,330

Net cash flow (used in)/from financing activities

   (1,724    (18          (1,632    (647    1,049      (2,972

Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents in the year

   (314     8              (6     29              (283

Cash dividends were received by National Grid plc from subsidiary undertakings amounting to £930m during the year ended 31 March 2016 (2015: £1,355m; 2014: £1,050m).

Maturity analysis of parent Company borrowings

    

2016

£m

       

2015

£m

 

Total borrowings are repayable as follows:

      

Less than 1 year

   933       1,068  

In 1 to 2 years

            

In 2 to 3 years

   482         

In 3 to 4 years

   395       443  

In 4 to 5 years

          360  

More than 5 years

   317       314  
          2,127        2,185  

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements167


Company accounting policies

 

We are required to include the stand-alone balance sheet of our ultimate parent Company, National Grid plc, under the Companies Act 2006. This is because the publicly traded shares are actually those of National Grid plc (the Company) and the following disclosures provide additional information to shareholders.

 

A. Basis of preparation

National Grid plc is the parent company of the National Grid Group which is engaged in the transmission and distribution of electricity and gas in Great Britain and northeastern US. The Company is a public limited liability company incorporated and domiciled in England, with its registered office at 1–3 Strand, London, WC2N 5EH.

The financial statements of National Grid plc for the year ended 31 March 2016 were approved by the Board of Directors on 18 May 2016. The Company meets the definition of a qualifying entity under Financial Reporting Standard 100 (FRS 100) issued by the Financial Reporting Council. Accordingly these individual financial statements of the Company were prepared in accordance with Financial Reporting Standard 101 ‘Reduced Disclosure Framework’ (FRS 101). In preparing these financial statements the Company applies the recognition and measurement requirements of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as adopted by the EU, but makes amendments where necessary in order to comply with the provisions of the Companies Act 2006 and sets out below where advantage of the FRS 101 disclosure exemptions has been taken.

These individual financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2016 are the first prepared in accordance with FRS 101. Accordingly the date of transition is 1 April 2014. The 2015 comparative financial information has also been prepared on this basis.

There were no material measurement or recognition adjustments on the adoption of FRS 101.

These individual financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with applicable UK accounting and financial reporting standards and the Companies Act 2006. They have been prepared on an historical cost basis, except for the revaluation of financial instruments, and are presented in pounds sterling, which is the currency of the primary economic environment in which the Company operates.

These individual financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which presumes that the Company has adequate resources to remain in operation, and that the Directors intend it to do so, for at least one year from the date the financial statements are signed. As the Company is part of a larger group it participates in the Group’s centralised treasury arrangements and so shares banking arrangements with its subsidiaries. The Company is expected to continue to generate positive cash flows or be in a position to obtain finance via intercompany loans to continue to operate for the foreseeable future.

The Directors are not aware of any material uncertainties related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt upon the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Thus they continue to adopt the going concern basis of accounting in preparing the annual financial statements.

The Company has not presented its own income statement or statement of comprehensive income as permitted by section 408 of the Companies Act 2006.

The following exemptions from the requirements of IFRS have been applied in the preparation of these financial statements of the Company in accordance with FRS 101:

 a cash flow statement and related notes;
disclosures in respect of transactions with wholly owned subsidiaries;
disclosures in respect of capital management;
the presentation of a third balance sheet (being the opening balance sheet of the Company at the date of application of FRS 101); and
the effects of new but not yet effective IFRSs.

As the consolidated financial statements of National Grid plc, which are available from the registered office, include the equivalent disclosures, the Company has also taken the exemptions under FRS 101 in respect of certain disclosures required by IFRS 13 ‘Fair value measurement’ and the disclosures required by IFRS 7 ‘Financial instruments: disclosures’. The Company intends to apply the above exemptions in the financial statements for the year ending 31 March 2017.

There are no critical areas of judgement that are considered to have a significant effect on the amounts recognised in the financial statements. Key sources of estimation uncertainty that have significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial year are the valuation of financial instruments and derivatives.

The balance sheet has been prepared in accordance with the Company’s accounting policies approved by the Board and described below:

B. Fixed asset investments

Investments held as fixed assets are stated at cost less any provisions for impairment. Investments are reviewed for impairment if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. Impairments are calculated such that the carrying value of the fixed asset investment is the lower of its cost or recoverable amount. Recoverable amount is the higher of its net realisable value and its value-in-use.

C. Tax

Current tax for the current and prior periods is provided at the amount expected to be paid or recovered using the tax rates and tax laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the balance sheet date.

Deferred tax is provided in full on temporary differences which result in an obligation at the balance sheet date to pay more tax, or the right to pay less tax, at a future date, at tax rates expected to apply when the temporary differences reverse based on tax rates and tax laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the balance sheet date. Deferred tax is provided for using the balance sheet liability method and is recognised on temporary differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities in the financial statements and the corresponding tax bases used in the computation of taxable profit.

Deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is regarded as more likely than not that they will be recovered. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are not discounted.

168National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements


   Financial Statements

D. Foreign currencies

Transactions in currencies other than the functional currency of the Company are recorded at the rates of exchange prevailing on the dates of the transactions. At each balance sheet date, monetary assets and liabilities that are denominated in foreign currencies are retranslated at closing exchange rates. Gains and losses arising on retranslation of monetary assets and liabilities are included in the profit and loss account.

E. Financial instruments

The Company’s accounting policies under UK GAAP, namely FRS 25 ‘Financial Instruments: Presentation’, FRS 26 ‘Financial Instruments: Measurement’ and FRS 29 ‘Financial Instruments: Disclosures’, are the same as the Group’s accounting policies under IFRS, namely IAS 32 ‘Financial Instruments: Presentation’, IAS 39 ‘Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement’ and IFRS 7 ‘Financial Instruments: Disclosures’. The Company applies these policies only in respect of the financial instruments that it has, namely investments, derivative financial instruments, debtors, cash at bank and in hand, borrowings and creditors.

The policies are set out in notes 13, 15, 17, 18, 19 and 20 to the consolidated financial statements. The Company is taking the exemption for financial instruments disclosures, because IFRS 7 disclosures are given in notes 30 and 33 to the consolidated financial statements.

F. Hedge accounting

The Company applies the same accounting policy as the Group in respect of fair value hedges and cash flow hedges. This policy is set out in note 15 to the consolidated financial statements.

G. Parent Company guarantees

The Company has guaranteed the repayment of the principal sum, any associated premium and interest on specific loans due by certain subsidiary undertakings primarily to third parties. In the event of default or non performance by the subsidiary, the Company recognises such guarantees as insurance contracts, at fair value with a corresponding increase in the carrying value of the investment.

H. Share awards to employees of subsidiary undertakings

The issuance by the Company to employees of its subsidiaries of a grant over the Company’s options represents additional capital contributions by the Company to its subsidiaries. An additional investment in subsidiaries results in a corresponding increase in shareholders’ equity. The additional capital contribution is based on the fair value of the option at the date of grant, allocated over the underlying grant’s vesting period. Where payments are subsequently received from subsidiaries, these are accounted for as a return of a capital contribution and credited against the Company’s investments in subsidiaries. The Company has no employees.

I. Dividends

Interim dividends are recognised when they are paid to the Company’s shareholders. Final dividends are recognised when they are approved by shareholders.

J. Directors’ remuneration

Full details of Directors’ remuneration are disclosed on pages 68 to 81.

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements169


Company balance sheet

at 31 March

       2016   2015 
   Notes   £m   £m 

 

Fixed assets

      

Investments

   1    8,845   8,823 

 

Current assets

      

Debtors (amounts falling due within one year)

   2    11,796   11,767 

Debtors (amounts falling due after more than one year)

   2    475   489 

Investments

   5    1,244   750 

Cash at bank and in hand

      – 

 

Total current assets

    13,516   13,006 

Creditors (amounts falling due within one year)

   3      (13,851)    (12,607)

 

Net current (liabilities)/assets

    (335)  399 

 

Total assets less current liabilities

    8,510   9,222 

Creditors (amounts falling due after more than one year)

   3    (3,538)  (3,425)

 

Net assets

    4,972   5,797 

 

Equity

      

Share capital

   7    447   443 

Share premium account

    1,326   1,331 

Cash flow hedge reserve

    17   17 

Available-for-sale reserve

    –   – 

Other equity reserves

    302   280 

Profit and loss account

   8    2,880   3,726 

 

Total shareholders’ equity

    4,972   5,797 

 

The notes on pages 172 and 173 form part of the individual financial statements of the Company, which were approved by the Board of Directors on 18 May 2016 and were signed on its behalf by:

Sir Peter Gershon Chairman

Andrew Bonfield Finance Director

National Grid plc

Registered number: 4031152

170National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements


   Financial Statements

Company statement of changes in equity

for the years ended 31 March

   

Share 

capital 

£m 

   

Share 

   premium 

account 

£m 

   

   Cash flow 

hedge 

reserve 

£m 

   

   Available- 

for-sale 

reserve 

£m 

   

Other 

equity 

    reserves 

£m 

   

Profit 

    and loss 

account 

£m 

   

Total 

     equity 

£m 

 

 

 

At 1 April 2014

   439      1,336      20           260      4,138      6,194   

Profit for the year

   –      –      –      –      –      1,181      1,181   

 

 

Other comprehensive income/(loss)

              

Transferred from equity in respect of cash flow hedges (net of tax)

   –      –      (3)     –      –      –      (3)  

Net losses taken to income statement

   –      –      –      (1)     –      –      (1)  

 

 

Other equity movements

              

Scrip dividend related share issue1

        (5)     –      –      –      –      (1)  

Purchase of treasury shares

   –      –      –      –      –      (338)     (338)  

Issue of treasury shares

   –      –      –      –      –      23      23   

Purchase of own shares

   –      –      –      –      –      (7)     (7)  

Share awards to employees of subsidiary undertakings

   –      –      –      –      20      –      20   

Dividends paid to equity shareholders

   –      –      –      –      –      (1,271)     (1,271)  

 

 

At 31 March 2015

   443      1,331      17      –      280      3,726      5,797   

Profit for the year

   –      –      –      –      –      748      748   

 

 

Other equity movements

              

Scrip dividend related share issue1

        (5)     –      –      –      –      (1)  

Purchase of treasury shares

   –      –      –      –      –      (267)     (267)  

Issue of treasury shares

   –      –      –      –      –      16      16   

Purchase of own shares

   –      –      –      –      –      (6)     (6)  

Share awards to employees of subsidiary undertakings

   –      –      –      –      22      –      22   

Dividends paid to equity shareholders

   –      –      –      –      –      (1,337)     (1,337)  

 

 

At 31 March 2016

   447      1,326      17      –      302      2,880      4,972   

 

 

1.  Included within share premium account are costs associated with scrip dividends.

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements171


Notes to the Company financial statements

1. Fixed asset investments

Shares in 

subsidiary 

undertakings 

£m 

At 1 April 2014

8,803 

Additions

20 

At 31 March 2015

8,823 

Additions

22 

At 31 March 2016

8,845 

During the year there was a capital contribution of £22m (2015: £20m) which represents the fair value of equity instruments granted to subsidiaries’ employees arising from equity-settled employee share schemes.

The names of the subsidiary undertakings, joint ventures and associates are included in note 32 to the consolidated financial statements. The Directors believe that the carrying value of the investments is supported by the fair value of their underlying net assets.

2. Debtors

   

2016 

£m 

  

2015 

£m 

 

Amounts falling due within one year

    

Derivative financial instruments (note 4)

  279   281 

Amounts owed by subsidiary undertakings

  11,516   11,484 

Prepayments and accrued income

    

 

        11,796         11,767 

 

Amounts falling due after more than one year

    

Derivative financial instruments (note 4)

  157   148 

Amounts owed by subsidiary undertakings

  318   341 

 

  475   489 

 

The carrying values stated above are considered to represent the fair values of the assets.

3. Creditors

   

2016 

£m 

  

2015 

£m 

 

Amounts falling due within one year

    

Borrowings (note 6)

  933   1,068 

Derivative financial instruments (note 4)

  239   289 

Amounts owed to subsidiary undertakings

  12,633   11,208 

Corporation tax payable

    

Other creditors

  43   39 

 

        13,851         12,607 

 

Amounts falling due after more than one year

    

Borrowings (note 6)

  1,194   1,117 

Derivative financial instruments (note 4)

  358   411 

Amounts owed to subsidiary undertakings1

  1,982   1,894 

Deferred tax

    

 

  3,538   3,425 

 

1.  All amounts owed to subsidiary undertakings in 2015 and 2016 are repayable after five years.

The carrying values stated above are considered to represent the fair values of the liabilities. A reconciliation of the movement in deferred tax in the year is shown below:

   Deferred 

tax 

£m 

At 1 April 2014

Charged to the profit and loss account

Credited to equity

(1)

At 31 March 2015

Charged to the profit and loss account

At 31 March 2016

172National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements


   Financial Statements

4. Derivative financial instruments

The fair values of derivative financial instruments are:

     2016          2015    
   

    Assets

£m

 

 Liabilities 

£m 

  

Total 

£m 

          Assets
£m
 

   Liabilities 

£m 

  

Total 

£m 

Amounts falling due within one year

 279 (239)  40   281 (289)  (8)

Amounts falling due after more than one year

 157 (358)  (201)   148 (411)  (263)
  436 (597)        (161)   429 (700)        (271)

For each class of derivative the notional contract1 amounts are as follows:

  

2016 

£m 

  

2015 

£m 

 

Interest rate swaps

 (2,442)  (2,499)

Cross-currency interest rate swaps

 (3,537)  (3,529)

Foreign exchange forward contracts

    (14,361)     (13,708)

 

 (20,340)  (19,736)

 

1.  The notional contract amounts of derivatives indicate the gross nominal value of transactions outstanding at the balance sheet date.

5. Investments

The following table sets out the Company’s current asset investments:

  

2016 

£m 

  

2015 

£m 

 

Investments in short-term money funds

 1,007   217 

Short-term deposits

 –   252 

Restricted balances – collateral

 237   281 

 

      1,244           750 

 

6. Borrowings

The following table analyses the Company’s total borrowings:

  

2016 

£m 

  

2015 

£m 

 

Amounts falling due within one year

   

Bank overdrafts

 –   13 

Bank loans

 28   28 

Bonds

 21   70 

Commercial paper

 884   957 

 

 933   1,068 

 

Amounts falling due after more than one year

   

Bonds

 1,194   1,117 

 

       2,127        2,185 

 

The maturity of total borrowings is disclosed in note 34 to the consolidated financial statements. There are no differences in the maturities as calculated under IFRS or FRS 101 ‘Reduced Disclosure Framework’.

The notional amount of borrowings outstanding as at 31 March 2016 was £2,101m (2015: £2,157m). Further information on significant borrowings can be found on the debt investors section of our website.

7. Share capital

The share capital amounting to £447m (2015: £443m) consists of 3,924,038,086 (2015: 3,891,691,900) ordinary shares. For further information on share capital, refer to note 24 to the consolidated financial statements.

8. Shareholders’ equity and reserves

At 31 March 2016 the profit and loss account reserve stood at £2,880m (2015: £3,726m) of which £86m (2015: £86m) related to gains on intra-group transactions which was not distributable to shareholders.

For further details of dividends paid and payable to shareholders, refer to note 8 to the consolidated financial statements.

9. Parent Company guarantees

The Company has guaranteed the repayment of the principal sum, any associated premium and interest on specific loans due by certain subsidiary undertakings primarily to third parties. At 31 March 2016, the sterling equivalent amounted to £2,674m (2015: £2,593m). The guarantees are for varying terms from less than one year to open-ended.

10. Audit fees

The audit fee in respect of the parent Company was £28,380 (2015: £27,553). Fees payable to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for non-audit services to the Company are not required to be disclosed as they are included within note 3 to the consolidated financial statements.

 

F. Hedge accounting
National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Financial Statements173


Additional Information contents

The business in detail

 

G. Parent Company guaranteesKey milestones

The Company has guaranteed the repaymentSome of the principal sum, any associated premiumkey dates and interest on specific loans due by certain subsidiary undertakings primarily to third parties. In the event of default or non performance by the subsidiary, the Company recognises such guarantees as insurance contracts, at fair value with a corresponding increaseactions in the carrying valuecorporate history of the investment.National Grid are listed below. The full history goes back much further.

 

H. Share awards to employees of subsidiary undertakings

The issuance by the Company to employees of its subsidiaries of a grant over the Company’s options represents additional capital contributions by the Company to its subsidiaries. An additional investment in subsidiaries results in a corresponding increase in shareholders’ equity. The additional capital contribution is based on the fair value of the option at the date of grant, allocated over the underlying grant’s vesting period. Where payments are subsequently received from subsidiaries, these are accounted for as a return of a capital contribution and credited against the Company’s investments in subsidiaries. The Company has no employees.

I. Dividends

Interim dividends are recognised when they are paid to the Company’s shareholders. Final dividends are recognised when they are approved by shareholders.

J. Directors’ remuneration

Full details of directors’ remuneration are disclosed on pages 60 To 75.

 

A. Basis of preparation of individual financial statements under UK GAAP

These individual financial statements of the Company have been prepared1986      

British Gas (BG) privatisation
1990Electricity transmission network in accordance with applicable UK accountingEngland and financial reporting standards and the Companies Act 2006. They have been prepared on an historical cost basis, except for the revaluation of financial instruments, and are presented in pounds sterling, which is the currency of the primary economic environment in which the Company operates. The 2014 comparative financial information has also been prepared on this basis.

These individual financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which presumes that the Company has adequate resourcesWales
transferred to remain in operation, and that the Directors intend it to do so, for at least one year from the date the financial statements are signed. Further details of the Directors’ assessment are set out on page 54.

The Company has not presented its own profit and loss account as permitted by section 408 of the Companies Act 2006.

The Company has taken advantage of the exemptions in FRS 8 ‘Related Party Disclosures’ from disclosing transactions with other members of the National Grid plc group of companies.

In accordance with exemptions under FRS 29 ‘Financial Instruments: Disclosures’, the Company has not presented the financial instruments disclosures required by the standard, as disclosures which comply with the standard are included in the consolidated financial statements.

B. Fixed asset investments

Investments held as fixed assets are stated at cost less any provisions for impairment. Investments are reviewed for impairment if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. Impairments are calculated such that the carrying value of the fixed asset investment is the lower of its cost or recoverable amount. Recoverable amount is the higher of its net realisable value and its value-in-use.

C. Tax

Current tax for the current and prior periods is provided at the amount expected to be paid or recovered using the tax rates and tax laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the balance sheet date.

Deferred tax is provided in full on timing differences which result in an obligation at the balance sheet date to pay more tax, or the right to pay less tax, at a future date, at tax rates expected to apply when the timing differences reverse based on tax rates and tax laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the balance sheet date. Timing differences arise from the inclusion of items of income and expenditure in tax computations in periods different from those in which they are included in the financial statements.

Deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is regarded as more likely than not that they will be recovered. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are not discounted.

electricity privatisation
 1995National Grid listed on the London Stock Exchange

LOGO1997Centrica demerged from BG
Energis demerged from National Grid
2000Lattice Group demerged from BG and listed separately
New England Electric System and Eastern Utilities Associates acquired
2002Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation merged
with National Grid in US
National Grid and Lattice Group merged to
form National Grid Transco
2004UK wireless infrastructure network acquired from
Crown Castle International Corp
2005Four UK regional gas distribution networks sold
and National Grid adopted as our name
2006Rhode Island gas distribution network acquired
2007UK and US wireless infrastructure operations and
the Basslink electricity interconnector in Australia sold
KeySpan Corporation acquired
2008Ravenswood generation station sold
2010Rights issue raised £3.2 billion
2012New Hampshire electricity and gas distribution
businesses sold
 

 

NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15159


         Financial Statements

    Company balance sheet

    at 31 March

      Notes   

2015

£m

  

2014  

£m  

 
  

 

 
  

Fixed assets

     
  

Investments

   1     8,823    8,803    
  

 

 
 
 

Current assets

 

Debtors (amounts falling due within one year)

 2   11,767   9,312    
 

Debtors (amounts falling due after more than one year)

 2   489   948    
 

Investments

 5   750   1,504    
 

Cash at bank and in hand

    1    
  

 

 
 

Total current assets

 13,006   11,765    
 
 

Creditors (amounts falling due within one year)

 3   (12,607 (10,345)   
  

 

 
 

Net current assets

 399   1,420    
  

 

 
 

Total assets less current liabilities

 9,222   10,223    
 
 

Creditors (amounts falling due after more than one year)

 3   (3,425 (4,029)   
  

 

 
 

Net assets

 5,797   6,194    
  

 

 
 
 

Capital and reserves

 

Share capital

 7   443   439    
 

Share premium account

 8   1,331   1,336    
 

Cash flow hedge reserve

 8   17   20    
 

Available-for-sale reserve

 8      1    
 

Other equity reserves

 8   280   260    
 

Profit and loss account

 8   3,726   4,138    
  

 

 
 

Total shareholders’ funds

 9   5,797   6,194    
  

 

 
 
 The notes on pages 161 to 163 form part of the individual financial statements of the Company, which were approved by the Board of Directors on 20 May 2015 and were signed on its behalf by:   
 
 

Sir Peter Gershon Chairman

Andrew Bonfield Finance Director

 
 

National Grid plc

Registered number: 4031152

     160174National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Additional Information 


 

 

Notes to the Company financial statements

  

1. Fixed asset investments

 

  
        Shares in   
subsidiary   
undertakings   
£m   
  

 

  

At 1 April 2013

  8,177  
  

Additions

  626  
  

 

  

At 31 March 2014

  8,803  
  

Additions

  20  
  

 

  

At 31 March 2015

  8,823  
  

 

 

 

During the year there was a capital contribution of £20m (2014: £20m) which represents the fair value of equity instruments granted to subsidiaries’ employees arising from equity-settled employee share schemes. During the year ended 31 March 2014, the Company acquired a further 98,851 ordinary shares of £1 each in National Grid (US) Holdings Limited for a total consideration of £606m.

 

The names of the principal subsidiary undertakings, joint ventures and associates are included in note 32 to the consolidated financial statements. The Directors believe that the carrying value of the investments is supported by the fair value of their underlying net assets.

 

2. Debtors

 

   

2015

£m

 

2014    

£m    

  

 

  

Amounts falling due within one year

  
  

Derivative financial instruments (note 4)

  281   284  
  

Amounts owed by subsidiary undertakings

  11,484   9,025  
  

Prepayments and accrued income

  2   3  
  

 

    11,767   9,312  
  

 

  

Amounts falling due after more than one year

  
  

Derivative financial instruments (note 4)

  148   643  
  

Amounts owed by subsidiary undertakings

  341   305  
  

 

    489   948  
  

 

 

 

The carrying values stated above are considered to represent the fair values of the assets.

 

3. Creditors

 

   

2015

£m

 

2014    

£m    

  

 

  

Amounts falling due within one year

  
  

Borrowings (note 6)

  1,068   1,327  
  

Derivative financial instruments (note 4)

  289   286  
  

Amounts owed by subsidiary undertakings

  11,208   8,695  
  

Corporation tax payable

  3   –  
  

Other creditors

  39   37  
  

 

    12,607   10,345  
  

 

  

Amounts falling due after more than one year

  
  

Borrowings (note 6)

  1,117   1,850  
  

Derivative financial instruments (note 4)

  411   154  
  

Amounts owed by subsidiary undertakings1

  1,894   2,022  
  

Deferred tax

  3   3  
  

 

    3,425   4,029  
  

 

 

 

1. All amounts owed by subsidiary undertakings in 2014 and 2015 are repayable after five years.

LOGO

   NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15161                                 


      Financial Statements

   Notes to the Company financial statements

   continued

   3. Creditorscontinued
   The carrying values stated above are considered to represent the fair values of the liabilities. A reconciliation of the movement in deferred tax in the year is shown below:
                          Deferred tax
£m
   

 

   At 1 April 2013            1  
   Charged to the profit and loss account            1  
   Charged to equity            1  
   

 

   At 31 March 2014            3  
   Charged to the profit and loss account            1  
   Credited to equity            (1) 
   

 

   At 31 March 2015            3  
   

 

 
 4. Derivative financial instruments
 The fair values of derivative financial instruments are:
   2015 2014
     

 

 

   

 

 

               Assets
£m
         Liabilities  
£m  
       Total  
£m  
             Assets
£m
 

        Liabilities  

£m  

              Total   

£m   

   

 

   Amounts falling due within one year   281     (289)     (8)     284    (286)  (2) 
   Amounts falling due after more than one year   148     (411)     (263)     643    (154)  489  
   

 

      429     (700)     (271)     927    (440)  487  
   

 

 

 

For each class of derivative the notional contract1 amounts are as follows:

           

2015  

£m  

2014   

£m   

   

 

   Interest rate swaps          (2,499)  (6,531) 
   Cross-currency interest rate swaps          (3,529)  (4,490) 
   Foreign exchange forward contracts          (13,708)  (11,626) 
   

 

             (19,736)  (22,647) 
   

 

 
   

1. The notional contract amounts of derivatives indicate the gross nominal value of transactions outstanding at the balance sheet date.

 
   5. Investments            
   The following table sets out the Company’s current asset investments:
                       

2015

£m

  

2014   

£m   

   

 

   Investments in short-term money funds          217  1,238  
   Short-term deposits          252  245  
   Restricted balances – collateral          281  21  
   

 

 7501,504  
   

 

 
 6. Borrowings
   The following table analyses the Company’s total borrowings:
                       

2015

£m

  

2014  

£m  

   

 

   Amounts falling due within one year            
   Bank overdrafts          13  –  
   Bank loans          28  423  
   Bonds          70  904  
   Commercial paper          957  –  
   

 

             1,068  1,327  
   

 

   Amounts falling due after more than one year            
   Bonds          1,117  1,850  
   

 

             2,185  3,177  
   

 

 

 

The maturity of total borrowings is disclosed in note 34 to the consolidated financial statements. There are no differences in the maturities as calculated under IFRS or UK GAAP.

 
 The notional amount of borrowings outstanding as at 31 March 2015 was £2,157m (2014: £3,074m). Further information on significant borrowings can be found on the debt investors section of our website.

     162


   

7. Share capital

The share capital amounting to £443m (2014: £439m) consists of 3,891,691,900 (2014: 3,854,339,684) ordinary shares. For further information on share capital, refer to note 24 to the consolidated financial statements.

 

8. Reserves

 

       Share   
    premium   
account   
£m   
   Cash flow   
hedge   
reserve   
£m   
   Available-   
for-sale   
reserve   
£m   
   Other equity   
reserves   
£m   
   Profit and   
loss account   
£m   
   

 

   

At 1 April 2013

   1,344       12       –       240      4,210  
   

Transferred from equity in respect of cash flow hedges (net of tax)

   –       8       –       –      –  
   

Net gains taken to equity

   –       –       1       –      –  
   

Scrip dividend related share issue

   (8)      –       –       –      –  
   

Issue of treasury shares

   –       –       –       –      14  
   

Purchase of own shares

   –       –       –       –      (3) 
   

Share awards to employees of subsidiary undertakings

   –       –       –       20      –  
   

Loss for the financial year

   –       –       –       –      (83) 
   

 

   

At 31 March 2014

   1,336       20       1       260      4,138
   

Transferred from equity in respect of cash flow hedges (net of tax)

   –       (3)      –       –      –  
   

Net gains taken to income statement

   –       –       (1)      –      –  
   

Scrip dividend related share issue

   (5)      –       –       –      –  
   

Purchase of treasury shares

   –       –       –       –      (338) 
   

Issue of treasury shares

   –       –       –       –      23  
   

Purchase of own shares

   –       –       –       –      (7) 
   

Share awards to employees of subsidiary undertakings

   –       –       –       20      –  
   

Loss for the financial year

   –       –       –       –      (90) 
   

 

   

At 31 March 2015

   1,331       17       –       280      3,726  
   

 

 

 

There were no gains and losses, other than losses for the years stated above; therefore no separate statement of total recognized gains and losses has been presented. At 31 March 2015, £86m (2014: £86m) of the profit and loss account reserve relating to gains on intra-group transactions was not distributable to shareholders.

 

9. Reconciliation of movements in total shareholders’ funds

 

         

2015   

£m   

 

2014   

£m   

   

 

   

Profit for the financial year

         1,181      976  
   

Dividends1

         (1,271)     (1,059) 
   

 

   

Loss for the financial year

         (90)     (83) 
   

Purchase of treasury shares

         (338)     –  
   

Issue of treasury shares

         23      14  
   

Purchase of own shares

         (7)     (3) 
   

Scrip dividend related share issue2

         (1)     (2) 
   

Movement on cash flow hedge reserve (net of tax)

         (3)     8  
   

Movement on available-for-sale reserve

         (1)     1  
   

Share awards to employees of subsidiary undertakings

         20      20  
   

 

   

Net decrease in shareholders’ funds

         (397)     (45) 
   

Opening shareholders’ funds

         6,194      6,239  
   

 

   

Closing shareholders’ funds

         5,797      6,194  
   

 

 

 

1. For further details of dividends paid and payable to shareholders, refer to note 8 to the consolidated financial statements.

2. Included within share premium account are costs associated with scrip dividends.

 

10. Parent Company guarantees

The Company has guaranteed the repayment of the principal sum, any associated premium and interest on specific loans due by certain subsidiary undertakings primarily to third parties. At 31 March 2015, the sterling equivalent amounted to £2,593m (2014: £2,713m). The guarantees are for varying terms from less than one year to open-ended.

 

11. Audit fees

The audit fee in respect of the parent Company was £27,553 (2014: £26,750). Fees payable to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for non-audit services to the Company are not required to be disclosed as they are included within note 3 to the consolidated financial statements.

LOGO

        NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15163                                 


            Additional Information

      The business in detail

LOGO

    164


LOGO

LOGO

          NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15165


Additional Information

 

The business in detailcontinued

 

    

UK regulation

Our licences are established under the Gas Act 1986 and Electricity Act 1989, as amended (the Acts). They require us to develop, maintain and operate economic and efficient networks and to facilitate competition in the supply of gas and electricity in Great Britain. They also give us statutory powers. These include the right to bury our pipes or cables under public highways and the ability to use compulsory powers to purchase land so we can conduct our business.

Our networks are regulated by Ofgem, which has established price control mechanisms that set the amount of revenue that our regulated businesses can earn. Price control regulation is designed to make sure our interests, as a monopoly, are balanced with those of our customers. Ofgem allows us to charge reasonable, but not excessive, prices. This gives us a future level of revenue that is sufficient to meet our statutory duties and licence obligations, and makes a reasonable return on our investment.

The price control includes a number of mechanisms designed to help achieve its objectives. These include financial incentives that encourage us to:

RIIO price controls

On 1 April 2013, our UK regulator introduced a new regulatory framework called RIIO (revenue = incentives + innovation + outputs), which lasts for eight years. The building blocks of the RIIO price control are broadly similar to the historical price controls used in the UK. However, there are some significant differences in the mechanics of the calculations.

How is revenue calculated?

Under RIIO the outputs we deliver are clearly articulated and are integrally linked to the calculation of our allowed revenue. These outputs have been determined through an extensive consultation process, which has given stakeholders a greater opportunity to influence the decisions. The clarity around outputs should lead to greater transparency in how we deliver them.

The six output categories are:

Safety: ensuring the provision of a safe energy network.

Reliability (and availability): promoting networks capable of delivering long-term reliability, as well as minimising the number and duration of interruptions experienced over the price control period, and ensuring adaptation to climate change.

Environmental impact: encouraging companies to play their role in achieving broader environmental objectives – specifically, facilitating the reduction of carbon emissions – as well as minimising their own carbon footprint.

Customer and stakeholder satisfaction: maintaining high levels of customer satisfaction and stakeholder engagement, and improving service levels.

Customer connections: encouraging networks to connect customers quickly and efficiently.

Social obligations (UK Gas Distribution only): extending the gas network to communities that are fuel poor where it is efficient to do so, and introducing measures to address carbon monoxide poisoning incidents.

Within each of these output categories are a number of primary and secondary deliverables, reflecting what our stakeholders want us to deliver over the coming price control period. The nature and number of these deliverables varies according to the output category, with some being linked directly to our allowed revenue, some linked to legislation, and others having only a reputational impact. Ofgem, using information we have submitted, along with independent assessments, determines the efficient level of expected costs necessary to deliver them. Under RIIO this is known as totex, which is total allowable expenditure, and is similar to the sum of what was controllable opex, capex (and repex for UK Gas Distribution) under the previous price control periods.

A number of assumptions are necessary in setting these outputs, such as certain prices or the volumes of work that will be needed. Consequently, there are a number of uncertainty mechanisms within the RIIO framework that can result in adjustments to totex if actual prices or volumes differ from the assumptions. These mechanisms protect us and our customers from windfall gains and losses.

continuously improve the cost and effectiveness of our services;

manage and operate our networks efficiently;

deliver high-quality services to our customers and wider stakeholder community; and
invest in developing the network in a way that ensures long-term security of supply.

Our UK Electricity Transmission (UK ET), UK Gas Transmission (UK GT) and UK Gas Distribution (UK GD) businesses operate under eight separate price controls in the UK. These comprise two for our UK ET operations, one covering our role as transmission owner (TO) and the other for our role as system operator (SO); two for our UK GT operations, again one as TO and one as SO; and one for each of our four regional gas distribution networks. While each of the eight price controls may have differing terms, they are based on a consistent regulatory framework.

In addition to the eight price controls, our LNG storage business has a price control covering some aspects of its operations. There is also a tariff cap price control applied to certain elements of domestic metering and daily meter reading activities carried out by National Grid Metering.

Interconnectors derive their revenues from congestion revenues. Congestion revenues depend on the existence of price differentials between markets at either end of the interconnector. European legislation governs how capacity is allocated. It requires all interconnection capacity to be allocated to the market through auctions.

There are a range of different regulatory models available for interconnector projects. These involve various levels of regulatory insight ranging from fully merchant (the project is reliant on revenues selling interconnector capacity) to ‘cap and floor’ (where revenues above the cap are returned to system users and revenues below the floor are topped by system users thus reducing the overall project risk).

       166


    

    

  

Where we under- or over-spend the allowed totex for reasons that are not covered by uncertainty mechanisms, there is a sharing factor. This means the under- or over-spend is shared between us and customers through an adjustment to allowed revenues in a future year. This sharing factor provides an incentive for us to provide the outputs efficiently, as we are able to keep a portion of the savings, with the remainder benefiting our customers.

 

This sharing factor is one of the ways that RIIO has given innovation more prominence. Innovation includes traditional areas such as new technologies, as well as the broader challenge of finding new ways of working to deliver outputs more efficiently. This broader challenge has an impact on everyone in our business.

 

Totex is then split between fast and slow money – a new concept under RIIO, based on a specified percentage. Fast money represents the amount of totex we are able to recover in the current year. Slow money is added to our RAV. For more details on the sharing factors under RIIO, please see the table below.

  

RIIO regulatory building blocks

 

LOGO

 

Allowed returns

The cost of capital allowed under RIIO is as follows:

         

Transmission

  

Gas Distribution

                    Gas  Electricity    
  

In addition to fast money, in each year we are allowed to collect a depreciation of and a return on our RAV.

 

This works in a similar way to the previous price control. However, there have been changes to the asset lives for electricity transmission (transition from 20 years to 45 years evenly across the RIIO period) and the depreciation calculation for UK GD (changed from 45 years straight line to 45 years sum of digits for assets added post 2002). We are also allowed to collect additional revenues related to non-controllable costs and incentives.

 

The incentive mechanisms can increase or decrease our allowed revenue and result from our performance against various measures related to our outputs. RIIO has introduced new incentive mechanisms as a way to provide further incentives to align our objectives with those of our customers and other stakeholders. For example, performance against our customer satisfaction targets can have a positive or negative effect of up to 1% of allowed annual revenues. Incentives will normally affect our revenues two years after the year of performance.

  Cost of equity(post-tax real)  

 

6.8%

  

 

7.0%

  

 

6.7%  

    Cost of debt(pre-tax real)  

iBoxx 10 year simple trailing average index

(2.92% for 2013/14)

    Notional gearing  62.5%  60.0%  65.0%  
    Vanilla WACC1  4.38%  4.55%  4.24%  
    

 

1.  Vanilla WACC = cost of debt x gearing + cost of equity x (1- gearing).

    

 

The sharing factor means that any over- and under-spend is shared between the businesses and consumers. The shared figures displayed are the sharing factors that apply to the UK ET, UK GT and UK GD.

 

For more information on RIIO, including incentive mechanisms, please see the relevant investor fact sheets on the Investor Relations section of our website.

  

 

Sharing factors under RIIO are as follows:

 

     

Gas Transmission

 

Electricity Transmission

   

Gas Distribution

     Transmission
Operator
  

System

Operator

 Transmission
Operator
 System
Operator        
   

North

West

  

East of

England

  

West

Midlands

  London
  

 

 Baseline3 35.6%

Repex:

Stepped decline from 50% in 2013/14 to 0% in 2020/21

in seven equal instalments of 7.14% per annum

         

 

 

Fast1

Uncertainty 10%62.60%15.00%72.10%73.90%73.37%75.05%76.53%
  

 

 Repex:
 

Baseline3 64.4%

Stepped increase from 50% in 2013/14 to 100% in 2020/21

in seven equal instalments of 7.14% per annum

         

 

 

Slow2

Uncertainty 90%

37.40%85.00%27.90%26.10%26.63%24.95%23.47%
  

 

 

Sharing

    44.36%46.89%63.04%
  

 

 

 

1.  Fast money allows network companies to recover a percentage of total expenditure within a one year period.

 

2.  Slow money is where costs are added to RAV and, therefore, revenues are recovered slowly (e.g. over 20 years) from both current and future consumers.

 

3.  The Baseline is the expenditure that is funded through ex ante allowances whereas the Uncertainty adjusts the allowed expenditure automatically where the level outputs delivered differ from the baseline level, or if triggered by an event.

LOGO

          NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15167


Additional Information

The business in detailcontinued

    

 

LOGO

 

 

US Regulation

Regulators

In the US, public utilities’ retail transactions are regulated by state utility commissions. The commissions serve as economic regulators, approving cost recoveryNational Grid Annual Report and authorised rates of return. The state commissions establish the retail rates to recover the cost of transmission and distribution services, and focus on services and costs within their jurisdictions. They also serve the public interest by making sure utilities provide safe and reliable service at just and reasonable prices. The commissions establish service standards and approve public utility mergers and acquisitions.

Utilities are regulated at the federal level (FERC) for wholesale transactions, such as interstate transmission and wholesale electricity sales, including rates for these services. FERC also regulates public utility holding companies and centralised service companies, including those of our US businesses.

Regulatory process

The US regulatory regime is premised on allowing the utility the opportunity to recover its cost of service and earn a reasonable return on its investments as determined by the commission. Utilities submit formal rate filings (‘rate cases’) to the relevant state regulator when additional revenues are necessary to provide safe, reliable service to customers. Utilities can be compelled to file a rate case due to complaints filed with the commission or at the commission’s own discretion.

The rate case is litigated with parties representing customer and other interests. In the states in which we operate, it can take nine to thirteen months for the commission to render a final decision. The utility is required to prove that the requested rate change is

prudent and reasonable, and the requested rate plan can span multiple years. Unlike the state processes, the federal regulator has no specified timeline for adjudicating a rate case, but typically makes a final decision retroactive when the case is completed.

Gas and electricity rates are established from a revenue requirement, or cost of service, equal to the utility’s total cost of providing distribution or delivery service to its customers, as approved by the commission in the rate case. This revenue requirement includes operating expenses, depreciation, taxes and a fair and reasonable return on shareholder capital invested in certain components of the utility’s regulated asset base, typically referred to as its rate base.

The final revenue requirement and rates for service are approved in the rate case decision. The revenue requirement is derived from a comprehensive study of the utility’s total costs during a recent 12 month period of operations, referred to as a test year. Each commission has its own rules and standards for adjustments to the test year and may include forecasted capital investments. These adjustments are intended to arrive at the total costs expected in the first year new rates will be in effect, or the rate year.

Accounts 2015/16
 The business in detail 

US regulatory revenue requirement

LOGO

Our rate plans

Each operating company has a set of rates for service. We have three electric distribution operations (upstate New York, Massachusetts, and Rhode Island) and six gas distribution networks (upstate New York, New York City, Long Island, Massachusetts (two), and Rhode Island).

Our operating companies have revenue decoupling mechanisms that de-link the companies’ revenues from the quantity of energy delivered and billed to customers. These mechanisms remove the natural disincentive utility companies have for promoting and encouraging customer participation in energy efficiency programmes that lower energy end use and thus distribution volumes.

Our rate plans are designed to a specific allowed RoE, by reference to an allowed operating expense level and rate base. Some rate plans include earnings sharing mechanisms that allow us to retain a proportion of the earnings above our allowed RoE, achieved through improving efficiency, with the balance benefiting customers.

In addition, our performance under certain rate plans is subject to service performance targets. We may be subject to monetary penalties in cases where we do not meet those targets.

One measure used to monitor the performance of our regulated businesses is a comparison of achieved RoE to allowed RoE, with a target that the achieved should be equal to or above the allowed. However, this measure cannot be used in isolation, as there are a number of factors that may prevent us from achieving that target. These factors include financial market conditions, regulatory lag and decisions by the regulator preventing cost recovery in rates from customers.

We work to increase achieved RoE through: productivity improvements; positive performance against incentives or earned savings mechanisms such as energy efficiency programmes, where available; and filing a new rate case when achieved returns are lower than the Company could reasonably expect to attain through a new rate case.

       168175


The business in detailcontinued

    

    

    

UK Regulation

Our licences are established under the Gas Act 1986 and Electricity Act 1989, as amended (the Acts). They require us to develop, maintain and operate economic and efficient networks and to facilitate competition in the supply of gas and electricity in Great Britain (GB). They also give us statutory powers. These include the right to bury our pipes or cables under public highways and the ability to use compulsory powers to purchase land so we can conduct our business.

Our networks are regulated by Ofgem, which has established price control mechanisms that set the amount of revenue our regulated businesses can earn. Price control regulation is designed to make sure our interests, as a monopoly, are balanced with those of our customers. Ofgem allows us to charge reasonable, but not excessive, prices. This gives us a future level of revenue that is sufficient to meet our statutory duties and licence obligations, and makes a reasonable return on our investment.

The price control includes a number of mechanisms designed to help achieve its objectives. These include financial incentives that encourage us to:

 

efficiently deliver by investment and maintenance the network outputs that customers and stakeholders require, including reliable supplies, new connections and infrastructure capacity;
innovate in order to continuously improve the services we give our customers, stakeholders and communities; and
efficiently balance the transmission networks to support the wholesale markets.

Our UK Electricity Transmission (UK ET), UK Gas Transmission (UK GT) and UK Gas Distribution (UK GD) businesses operate under eight separate price controls in the UK. These comprise two for our UK ET operations, one covering our role as transmission owner (TO) and the other for our role as system operator (SO); two for our UK GT operations, again one as TO and one as SO; and one for each of our four regional gas distribution networks. While each of the eight price controls may have differing terms, they are based on a consistent regulatory framework.

In addition to the eight price controls, there is also a tariff cap price control applied to certain elements of domestic metering and daily meter reading activities carried out by National Grid Metering.

Interconnectors derive their revenues from sales of capacity to users who wish to move power between market areas with different prices. These sales revenues are called congestion revenues because market price differences result from the congestion on the finite interconnector capacity, which limits full price convergence. European legislation governs how congestion revenues may be used and how interconnection capacity is allocated. It requires all interconnection capacity to be allocated to the market through auctions.

There are a range of different regulatory models available for interconnector projects. These involve various levels of regulatory intervention ranging from fully merchant (the project is fully reliant on sales of interconnector capacity) to cap and floor (where sales revenues above the cap are returned to transmission system users and revenues below the floor are topped up by transmission system users, thus reducing the overall project risk).

The cap and floor regime is now the regulated route for interconnector investment in GB, which sits alongside the exemption route (whereby project developers apply for exemptions from aspects of European legislation).

RIIO price controls

On 1 April 2013, Ofgem introduced a new regulatory framework called RIIO (revenue = incentives + innovation + outputs), with the first price control agreed under the new framework lasting for eight years. The building blocks of the RIIO price control are broadly similar to the historical price controls used in the UK. However, there are some significant differences in the mechanics of the calculations.

How is revenue calculated?

Under RIIO the outputs we deliver are clearly articulated and are integrally linked to the calculation of our allowed revenue. These outputs have been determined through an extensive consultation process, which has given stakeholders a greater opportunity to influence the decisions.

There are six output categories:

Safety: ensuring the provision of a safe energy network.

Reliability (and availability): promoting networks capable of delivering long-term reliability, as well as minimising the number and duration of interruptions experienced over the price control period, and ensuring adaptation to climate change.

Environmental impact: encouraging companies to play their role in achieving broader environmental objectives – specifically, facilitating the reduction of carbon emissions – as well as minimising their own carbon footprint.

Customer and stakeholder satisfaction: maintaining high levels of customer satisfaction and stakeholder engagement, and improving service levels.

Customer connections: encouraging networks to connect customers quickly and efficiently.

Social obligations (UK GD only): extending the gas network to communities that are fuel poor where it is efficient to do so, and introducing measures to address carbon monoxide poisoning incidents.

Within each of these output categories are a number of primary and secondary deliverables, reflecting what our stakeholders want us to deliver over the coming price control period. The nature and number of these deliverables varies according to the output category, with some being linked directly to our allowed revenue, some linked to legislation, and others having only a reputational impact.

Ofgem, using information we have submitted, along with independent assessments, determines the efficient level of expected costs necessary to deliver them. Under RIIO this is known as totex, which is a component of total allowable expenditure, and is the sum of what was defined in previous price controls as operating expenditure (opex), capital expenditure (capex) and, in UK GD controls, mains replacement expenditure (repex).

A number of assumptions are necessary in setting these outputs, such as certain prices or the volumes of work that will be needed. Consequently, there are a number of uncertainty mechanisms within the RIIO framework that can result in adjustments to totex if actual prices or volumes differ from the assumptions. These mechanisms protect us and our customers from windfall gains and losses.

Where we under- or over-spend the allowed totex for reasons that are not covered by uncertainty mechanisms, there is a sharing factor. This means the under- or over-spend is shared between us and customers through an adjustment to allowed revenues in future years. This sharing factor provides an incentive for us to provide the outputs efficiently, as we are able to keep a portion of savings we make, with the remainder benefiting our customers.

This sharing factor is one of the ways that RIIO has given innovation more prominence. Innovation includes traditional areas such as new technologies, as well as the broader challenge of finding new ways of working to deliver outputs more efficiently. This broader challenge has an impact on everyone in our business.

 

176 

Features of our rate plans

We bill our customers for their use of electricityNational Grid Annual Report and gas services. Customer bills typically comprise a commodity charge, covering the cost of the electricity or gas delivered, and charges covering our delivery service. With the exception of residential gas customers in Rhode Island, our customers are allowed to select an unregulated competitive supplier for the supply component of electricity and gas utility services. A substantial proportion of our costs, in particular electricity and gas commodity purchases, are pass-through costs, meaning they are fully recoverable from our customers. These pass-through costs are recovered through separate charges to customers that are designed to recover those costs with no profit. Rates are adjusted from time to time to make sure that any over- or under-recovery of these costs is returned to, or recovered from, our customers.

Our FERC-regulated transmission companies use formula rates (instead of rate cases) to set rates annually to recover their cost of service. Through the use of annual true-ups, formula rates recover our actual costs incurred and the allowed RoE based on the actual transmission rate base each year. The company must make annual formula rate filings documenting the revenue requirement, which customers can review and challenge.

Revenue for our wholesale transmission businesses in New England and New York is collected from wholesale transmission customers, who are typically other utilities and include our own New England electricity distribution businesses. With the exception of upstate New York, which continues to combine retail transmission and distribution rates to end-use customers, these wholesale transmission costs are incurred by distribution utilities on behalf of their customers and are fully recovered as a pass-through from end-use customers as approved by each state commission.

Our Long Island generation plants sell capacity to LIPA under 15 year and 25 year power supply agreements, and within wholesale tariffs approved by FERC. Through the use of cost-based formula rates these long-term contracts provide a similar economic effect to cost of service rate regulation.

US regulatory filings

The objectives of our rate case filings are to make sure we have the right cost of service with the ability to earn a fair and reasonable rate of return, while providing safe, reliable and economical service to our customers. In order to achieve these objectives and to reduce regulatory lag, we have been requesting structural changes, such as revenue decoupling mechanisms, capital trackers, commodity-related bad debt true-ups and pension and other post-employment benefit true-ups, separately from base rates. These terms are explained below the table on page 172.

Below we summarise significant developments in rate filings and the regulatory environment during the year. We completed the final stabilisation upgrade to our new financial systems in July 2014. The new systems will facilitate future regulatory filings and capture the benefit of the increased investments in asset replacement, network reliability and customer growth. Planning has started to prepare suitable ‘test years’ to support new regulatory filings. We expect to make a number of such filings over the next two to three years to update the capital investment allowances and rate base across many of our businesses. Specifically, we anticipate that KEDLI, KEDNY, and Massachusetts Electric will file applications for new rate plans with their regulators during the 12 months ending 31 March 2016. Moreover, as part of current regulatory initiatives, we will file proposals for investments in grid modernisation in Massachusetts and for innovative technology deployments and service offerings as part of the Reforming the Energy Vision effort

Accounts 2015/16
 Additional Information 

in New York. Effective 1 April 2015, we implemented changes to our US management structure to strengthen our jurisdictional focus and address recommendations made by our regulators, including giving jurisdictional presidents more authority over operations and other functions.

Massachusetts

Capital investment programmes

Most recently, on the electricity side, MADPU allowed approximately $12 million into rates effective from 1 March 2015, related to $170 million of plant investments made in 2013.

On the gas side, MADPU allowed approximately $15 million into rates effective from 1 November 2014, related to $134 million of plant investment made in 2013. Additionally, recent legislation in Massachusetts grants us greater ability to cost effectively accelerate the replacement of our ageing gas infrastructure by receiving concurrent cost recovery for eligible capital investments. We submitted a plan to MADPU on 31 October 2014 to replace all eligible ageing gas infrastructure on our system within 20 years by increasing the annual replacement rate by approximately 50% within the next 10 years, and then maintaining this replacement rate for the remainder of the programme. On 30 April 2015, MADPU approved our proposal to place an additional $9.7 million into rates effective from 1 May 2015, related to $175 million of anticipated investments in 2015 under this accelerated pipe replacement plan.

Solar investment legislation

Recent legislation extended our ability to construct, own and operate a total of up to 25 MW of solar facilities within our electricity service territory if the facilities are constructed by 30 June 2016. On 28 June 2014, MADPU approved our proposal for up to 20 MW of solar facilities, in addition to the 4.6 MW of solar generation that we already own and operate under the same legislation. MADPU also pre-approved an amount not to exceed $97.6 million for ownership costs, lease expenses and property tax expenses associated with the solar facilities. We have entered into contracts with developers to deliver constructed solar generation facilities by 2015, and will petition MADPU for cost recovery in 2016 once the solar facilities become operational.

Storm fund recovery

The Massachusetts electricity business collects $4.3 million annually in base rates to credit towards a storm fund devoted to fund major storm restoration efforts. The severity and frequency of storms in Massachusetts over the last few years left our storm fund in a deficit position of approximately $212 million. On 3 May 2013, MADPU allowed us to begin collecting $40 million annually for three years, and an additional $7.3 million from 1 July 2014, towards the replenishment of the storm fund, subject to a review of the prudency of the underlying costs. That review is under way, with evidentiary hearings scheduled for May 2015. The funding of the remaining deficit will be addressed as part of the prudency review and in future rate proceedings, if necessary.

Storm management audit

MADPU’s December 2012 order regarding our performance during Tropical Storm Irene and the October 2011 snowstorm required us to undergo an independent audit regarding our storm management. MADPU adopted the auditor’s 30 recommendations, which included items such as improving emergency response training and tracking of training, designating additional personnel for storm roles, and considering the expanded use of technology and communication tools. The Company has already implemented 12 of the recommendations and is in the process of implementing the remaining recommendations.

LOGO

NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15169


 

Additional Information

 

The business in detailcontinued

Allowed revenue to fund totex costs are split between fast and slow money – a concept under RIIO, based on a specified percentage that is fixed for the duration of the price control (except for UK GD’s repex which changes on a linear scale across the price control). Fast money represents the amount of totex we are able to recover in the next available year. Slow money is added to our RAV – effectively the regulatory IOU. For more details on the sharing factors under RIIO, please see the table below.

In addition to fast money, in each year we are allowed to recover a portion of the RAV (regulatory depreciation) and a return on the outstanding RAV balance.

The asset life for regulatory depreciation in electricity transmission spans 45 years across the RIIO period. This is also the case for the asset life depreciation for UK GD. We are also allowed to collect additional revenues related to non-controllable costs and incentives.

The incentive mechanisms can increase or decrease our allowed revenue and result from our performance against various measures related to our outputs. RIIO has incentive mechanisms that encourage us to align our objectives with those of our customers and other stakeholders. For example, performance against our customer satisfaction targets can have a positive or negative effect of up to 1% of allowed annual revenues. Most of our incentives affect our revenues two years after the year of performance.

The RIIO controls for both our transmission and gas distribution businesses were introduced on 1 April 2013 and the first price control period lasts for eight years. During the eight year period our regulator included a provision for a potential mid-period review, with scope driven by:

 

changes to outputs that can be justified by clear changes in government policy; and
the introduction of new outputs that are needed to meet the needs of consumers and other network users.

In November 2015, Ofgem launched a consultation on a potentialRIIO-T1 and GD1 mid-period review.

Under the RIIO controls, we are required to deliver agreed outputs for consumers and are funded to cover the costs of delivering these. The eight year price control includes a number of uncertainty mechanisms to take account of the fact that some outputs and funding cannot be set with certainty at the start of the period. One of these uncertainty mechanisms is the review of outputs. In May 2016, Ofgem decided to launch a mid-period review focusing on the transmission outputs.

RIIO regulatory building blocks

LOGO

Allowed returns

The cost of capital allowed under RIIO is as follows:

  

Transmission

 

  Gas Distribution  

  Gas              Electricity   

 

Cost of equity (post-tax real)

 6.8%  7.0%  6.7% 

 

Cost of debt (pre-tax real)

    iBoxx 10-year simple trailing average index
         (2.55% for 2015/16)

 

Notional gearing

 62.5%  60.0%  65.0% 

 

Vanilla WACC1

 4.14%  4.33%  4.01% 

 

1. Vanilla WACC = cost of debt x gearing + cost of equity x (1-gearing).

The sharing factor means that any over- and under-spend is shared between the businesses and consumers. The shared figures displayed in the table below are the sharing factors that apply to UK ET, UK GT and UK GD.

For more information on RIIO, including incentive mechanisms, please see the relevant investor fact sheets on the Investor Relations section of our website.

Sharing factors under RIIO are as follows:

  Gas Transmission 

Electricity Transmission

 Gas Distribution
  Transmission
Operator
 System
Operator
 Transmission     
Operator
 System
Operator          
 

North

West

 

East of

England

 

West

Midlands

 London              

 

     Repex:   
     Stepped decline from 50% in 2013/14 to 0% in 2020/21
 Baseline3 35.6%        in seven equal instalments of 7.14% per annum
     

 

Fast1

 Uncertainty 10%     62.60%             15.00% 72.10% 73.90%             73.37%             75.05%             76.53%

 

     Repex:   
     Stepped increase from 50% in 2013/14 to 100% in 2020/21        
 Baseline3 64.4%    in seven equal instalments of 7.14% per annum
     

 

Slow2

 Uncertainty 90% 37.40% 85.00% 27.90% 26.10% 26.63% 24.95% 23.47%

 

Sharing

 44.36% 46.89%     63.04%

 

1.Fast money allows network companies to recover a percentage of total expenditure within a one year period.
2.Slow money is where costs are added to RAV and, therefore, revenues are recovered slowly (e.g. over 20 years) from both current and future consumers.
3.The baseline is the expenditure that is funded through ex-ante allowances, whereas the uncertainty adjusts the allowed expenditure automatically where the level outputs delivered differ from the baseline level, or if triggered by an event.

 

 

National Grid modernisation

MADPU is increasingly focused on improving serviceAnnual Report and reliability to customers, with a focus on greater choice for customers and integrating distributed energy resources. MADPU has directed the Company to file a grid modernisation plan in August 2015 that demonstrates how the Company will make measurable progress towards reducing the effect of outages, optimising demand, integrating distributed resources and improving workforce and asset management. The grid modernisation plan represents a new capital investment opportunity for the Company. MADPU established criteria that, if met, would allow the capital costs from the plan to be recovered through a separate capital recovery mechanism.

Additionally, the Company’s Worcester, Massachusetts Smart Energy Solutions pilot began on 1 January 2015. The pilot is testing grid modernisation technologies for approximately 15,000 customers, with a goal of reducing peak and average loads by 5%. The Company has an opportunity to earn a performance incentive if load reduction exceeds 5%. The Company filed on 15 September 2014 to recover $11 million of costs incurred in 2012 and 2013 to implement this pilot. MADPU is currently reviewing the Company’s request and a decision is expected in early 2016.

Service quality

MADPU issued its final order and service quality guidelines for all gas and electricity companies on 22 December 2014. The order shifted the goal of the service quality guidelines from preventing the deterioration of performance to improved service quality. The reasons stated by MADPU included that: the companies are able to achieve higher levels of service quality than in 2002, when the guidelines were first implemented; customers expect improved levels of service quality; and advances in available technologies and the expected grid modernisation efforts of the electricity companies will help them meet the new standards and at a more reasonable cost. In shifting the goals of service quality, MADPU made changes to the current service quality structure, including removing financial offsets to penalties, setting state-wide benchmarks and changing the calculation of benchmarks and penalties. The new guidelines are effective from 1 January 2015. However, there is a motion for clarification and reconsideration currently pending before MADPU on this matter.

New York

Upstate New York 2012 rate plan filing

Effective from 1 April 2014, the upstate New York electricity and gas businesses entered the second year of their three year rate plan. The rate plan provides an increase in the electricity delivery revenue requirement of $51.4 million and $28.3 million for rate years two and three, respectively. For the gas operations, the rate plan provides an increase of $5.9 million and $6.3 million in rate years two and three, respectively.

Reforming the Energy Vision (REV)

In April 2014, the NYPSC instituted the REV proceeding, which considers options for a new regulatory and operational model for electricity utilities that includes a greater emphasis on incorporating distributed energy resources (DER) via market mechanisms. The NYPSC envisions a new role for utilities as distributed system platform (DSP) providers who create markets for DER and more fully integrate DER in distribution system operations and planning. The REV proceeding’s objectives include: enhanced customer energy choices and control; improved electricity system efficiency, reliability, and resiliency; and cleaner more diverse electricity generation. In February 2015, the NYPSC issued an order addressing various technical, policy, and market design issues.

Accounts 2015/16
 The business in detail 

The NYPSC is expected to address ratemaking issues in 2015. Implementation of the DSP role and greater DER integration will probably require incremental investments in utility infrastructure.

2013 New York gas management audit

In October 2014, the NYPSC issued a report on the results of the comprehensive management and operations audit of National Grid’s three New York gas distribution utilities. New York law requires periodic management audits of all utilities at least once every five years. We last underwent a management audit in 2009 when the NYPSC audited Niagara Mohawk’s electricity business.

The audit found that our operations performed well in providing reliable gas service and noted strength in operations, network planning, project management, work management, load forecasting, supply procurement and customer systems support. The audit report offered 31 recommendations aimed at promoting improvement in the performance of our New York gas businesses, including recommendations around strengthening of the National Grid US jurisdictional operating model, enhancing the service level agreements between the operating companies and supporting functions and corporate governance. We generally accept the recommendations presented in the report, and are currently working to implement the recommendations in a manner that will deliver the greatest value to our gas customers. To address the recommendation that the National Grid USA Board include at least one independent director, Therese Esperdy was elected to the Board of Directors with effect from 1 May 2015. In our next major gas rate proceeding, the NYPSC will consider our effectiveness in implementing the audit recommendations and seek to reflect the costs and savings associated with the recommendations in rates.

KEDLI gas investment plan

In June 2014, KEDLI petitioned the NYPSC for approval of a deferral mechanism related to a proposed gas infrastructure investment programme. In December 2014, the NYPSC approved two gas investment plans for calendar years 2015 and 2016, one for leak-prone pipe capital expenditures (capped at $211.7 million in total) and one for gas service expansion expenditures (capped at $202.9 million in total). The NYPSC approved a surcharge to begin recovery of the deferred leak-prone pipeline investment costs, allowing for the recovery up to a total of $23.4 million through a surcharge effective from 1 April 2015 until the end of 2016. KEDLI received approval to establish a new deferral accounting mechanism for the balance of the approved costs not covered by the surcharge.

KEDNY rate plan extension

In June 2013, the NYPSC approved a two year extension of KEDNY’s five year rate settlement, extending the rate plan until the end of 2014. The NYPSC modified KEDNY’s capital tracker to be a downward-only net utility plant reconciliation mechanism, covering the cumulative two year term ending 31 December 2014. The extension of KEDNY’s rate settlement included increased capital investment allowances for 2013 and 2014.

Rhode Island

Rhode Island 2014/15 electricity and gas infrastructure, safety and reliability (ISR) plans

State law provides our Rhode Island gas and electricity operating divisions with rate mechanisms that allow for the recovery of capital investment, including a return, and certain expenses outside base rate proceedings through the submission of annual ISR plans.

177


The business in detailcontinued

US Regulation

Regulators

In the US, public utilities’ retail transactions are regulated by state utility commissions. The commissions serve as economic regulators, approving cost recovery and authorised rates of return. The state commissions establish the retail rates to recover the cost of transmission and distribution services, and focus on services and costs within their jurisdictions. They also serve the public interest by making sure utilities provide safe and reliable service at just and reasonable prices. The commissions establish service standards and approve public utility mergers and acquisitions.

Utilities are regulated at the federal level (FERC) for wholesale transactions, such as interstate transmission and wholesale electricity sales, including rates for these services. FERC also regulates public utility holding companies and centralised service companies, including those of our US businesses.

Regulatory process

The US regulatory regime is premised on allowing the utility the opportunity to recover its cost of service and earn a reasonable return on its investments as determined by the commission. Utilities submit formal rate filings (‘rate cases’) to the relevant state regulator when additional revenues are necessary to provide safe, reliable service to customers. Utilities can be compelled to file a rate case due to complaints filed with the commission or at the commission’s own discretion.

The rate case is typically litigated with parties representing customer and other interests. In the states in which we operate, it can take nine to thirteen months for the commission to render a final decision. The utility is required to prove that the requested rate change is prudent and reasonable, and the requested rate plan can span multiple years. Unlike the state processes, the federal regulator has no specified timeline for adjudicating a rate case, but typically makes a final decision retroactive when the case is completed.

Gas and electricity rates are established from a revenue requirement, or cost of service, equal to the utility’s total cost of providing distribution or delivery service to its customers, as approved by the commission in the rate case. This revenue requirement includes operating expenses, depreciation, taxes and a fair and reasonable return on shareholder capital invested in certain components of the utility’s regulated asset base, typically referred to as its rate base.

The final revenue requirement and rates for service are approved in the rate case decision. The revenue requirement is derived from a comprehensive study of the utility’s total costs during a recent 12 month period of operations, referred to as a test year. Each commission has its own rules and standards for adjustments to the test year and may include forecasted capital investments and operating costs.

US regulatory revenue requirement

LOGO

Our rate plans

Each operating company has a set of rates for service. We have three electric distribution operations (upstate New York, Massachusetts and Rhode Island) and six gas distribution networks (upstate New York, New York City, Long Island, Massachusetts (two) and Rhode Island).

Our operating companies have revenue decoupling mechanisms that de-link the companies’ revenues from the quantity of energy delivered and billed to customers. These mechanisms remove the natural disincentive utility companies have for promoting and encouraging customer participation in energy efficiency programmes that lower energy end use and thus distribution volumes.

Our rate plans are designed to a specific allowed RoE, by reference to an allowed operating expense level and rate base. Some rate plans include earnings sharing mechanisms that allow us to retain a proportion of the earnings above our allowed RoE, achieved through improving efficiency, with the balance benefiting customers.

In addition, our performance under certain rate plans is subject to service performance targets. We may be subject to monetary penalties in cases where we do not meet those targets.

One measure used to monitor the performance of our regulated businesses is a comparison of achieved RoE to allowed RoE. However, this measure cannot be used in isolation, as there are a number of factors that may prevent us from achieving the allowed RoE. These factors include financial market conditions, regulatory lag and decisions by the regulator preventing cost recovery in rates from customers.

We work to increase achieved RoE through: productivity improvements; positive performance against incentives or earned savings mechanisms such as energy efficiency programmes, where available; and filing a new rate case when achieved returns are lower than the Company could reasonably expect to attain through a new rate case.

Features of our rate plans

We bill our customers for their use of electricity and gas services. Customer bills typically comprise a commodity charge, covering the cost of the electricity or gas delivered, and charges covering our delivery service. With the exception of residential gas customers in Rhode Island, our customers are allowed to select an unregulated competitive supplier for the supply component of electricity and gas utility services.

A substantial proportion of our costs, in particular electricity and gas commodity purchases, are pass-through costs, meaning they are fully recoverable from our customers. These pass-through costs are recovered through separate charges to customers that are designed to recover those costs with no profit. Rates are adjusted from time to time to make sure that any over- or under-recovery of these costs is returned to, or recovered from, our customers.

Our FERC-regulated transmission companies use formula rates (instead of rate cases) to set rates annually to recover their cost of service. Through the use of annual true-ups, formula rates recover our actual costs incurred and the allowed RoE based on the actual transmission rate base each year. The Company must make annual formula rate filings documenting the revenue requirement, which customers can review and challenge.

Revenue for our wholesale transmission businesses in New England and New York is collected from wholesale transmission customers, who are typically other utilities and include our own New England electricity distribution businesses. With the exception of upstate New York, which continues to combine retail transmission and distribution rates to end-use customers, these wholesale transmission costs are incurred by distribution utilities on behalf of their customers and are fully recovered as a pass-through from end-use customers as approved by each state commission.

 

 

       170178National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Additional Information 


 

 

   Additional Information

 

 

 

Our Long Island generation plants sell capacity to LIPA under15-year and25-year power supply agreements, and within wholesale tariffs approved by FERC. Through the use of cost based formula rates, these long-term contracts provide a similar economic effect to cost of service rate regulation.

US regulatory filings

The objectives of our rate case filings are to make sure we have the right cost of service, with the ability to earn a fair and reasonable rate of return while providing safe, reliable and economical service to our customers. In order to achieve these objectives and to reduce regulatory lag, we have been requesting structural changes, such as revenue decoupling mechanisms, capital trackers, commodity-related bad debt true-ups and pension and other post-employment benefit true-ups, separately from base rates. These terms are explained below the table on page 182.

Below, we summarise significant developments in rate filings and the regulatory environment during the year. We completed the final stabilisation upgrade to our new financial systems in July 2014. With 12 months of historical ‘test year’ data available from the stabilised financial systems, we commenced a new round of full rate case filings, starting with the filing for Massachusetts Electric in November 2015, and followed by the filings for KEDNY and KEDLI in January 2016. We expect to make a number of such filings over the next two to three years to update the capital investment allowances and rate bases across many of our businesses. These filings are expected to capture the benefit of recent increased investments in asset replacement and network reliability, and reflect long-term growth in costs, including property tax and healthcare costs. Along with a clear focus on productivity, the filings are key to improving achieved returns in the Company’s US distribution activities.

Moreover, as part of current regulatory initiatives, we filed a proposal for investments in grid modernisation in Massachusetts and anticipate a similar proposal for innovative technology deployments and service offerings as part of the Reforming the Energy Vision (REV) effort in New York in 2016.

Massachusetts

Massachusetts electric rate case

On 6 November 2015, we filed a one-year rate plan for our Massachusetts electric business to take effect from 1 October 2016, which was updated on 29 April 2016. The updated rate case filing requests an annualised net increase in distribution revenue of approximately $137 million. The filing includes a request to increase annual capital investment subject to the capital investment recovery mechanism from $170 million to $285 million, and to include property tax recovery on incremental capital placed in service. The filing also requests an increase in annual base rate funding of the storm fund mechanism from $4.3 million to $14 million, and a 14-month extension of the incremental funding to address the storm fund’s deficit, created by weather events occurring through February 2015. The filing is based on an RoE of 10.5% and a capital structure of 52% equity and 48% debt.

Capital investment programmes

On the gas side, on 30 October 2015, we filed the second plan in a20-year programme to replace ageing gas infrastructure by receiving concurrent cost recovery for eligible capital investments. On 29 April 2016, MADPU approved our proposal to place an additional $28.9 million into rates effective from 1 May 2016, related to $219 million of anticipated investments in 2016 under this accelerated pipe replacement plan. The Company filed the reconciliation of the 2015 investments on 29 April 2016. Additionally, the Company continues to recover costs associated with its pre-existing leak prone pipe replacement programme outside of base rates until the next rate case, including the submittal of a proposal to begin recovery of an additional $4.1 million of incremental revenue requirement effective from 1 November 2016.

Storm fund recovery

The Massachusetts electricity business collects $4.3 million annually in base rates to credit towards a storm fund devoted to fund major storm response and restoration efforts. The severity and frequency of storms in Massachusetts between February 2010 and February 2016 resulted in approximately $252 million of incremental storm-related costs as at 31 March 2016.

MADPU allowed us to begin collecting $40 million annually for three years beginning on 4 May 2013, and an additional $7.6 million from 1 July 2014, towards the replenishment of the storm fund. This annual recovery was further extended through 4 August 2016. Ultimate recovery of the storm costs is subject to a prudency review by MADPU of the underlying costs. The Company expects an order on the prudency of $213 million of storm-related costs from the February 2010 through March 2013 storm events by August 2016. As explained above, in the Massachusetts electric rate case, we proposed to collect the deficit created by storm events through February 2015, subject to a prudency review, and increase the annual base rate funding of the storm fund. Recoverable costs associated with storm events after February 2015 are deferred for future recovery and subject to future prudency review.

Grid modernisation

In response to a 2014 regulatory requirement, the Company filed a Massachusetts electricity grid modernisation plan on 19 August 2015 that proposed multiple investment options that would further MADPU’s goals of reducing the effect of outages, optimising demand, integrating distributed resources, and improving workforce and asset management. The Company presented a range of investment options for MADPU to consider, with investment levels over five years ranging from $225 million to $831 million. MADPU established criteria that, if met, would allow the capital costs from the plan to be recovered through a separate capital recovery mechanism. MADPU initiated its review of the Company’s plan in April 2016.

New York

Upstate New York 2015 petition to use deferred credits

to fund capital expenditures

With the three-year rate plan for Niagara Mohawk’s electricity and gas businesses expiring on 31 March 2016, in December 2015, we filed a petition with NYPSC to use up to $124 million and $27 million of deferred credits associated with its electricity and gas operations, respectively, to fund incremental capital expenditures for those businesses in 2017 and 2018 above the capital allowances in the expiring rate plan. The Company expects an order in May or June 2016.

Reforming the Energy Vision (REV)

In April 2014, NYPSC instituted the REV proceeding, which envisions a new role for utilities as distributed system platform (DSP) providers who create markets for distributed energy resources (DER) and more fully integrate DER in distribution system operations and planning. The REV proceeding’s objectives include: enhanced customer energy choices and control; improved electricity system efficiency, reliability, and resiliency; and cleaner, more diverse electricity generation.

NYPSC is expected to issue an order in 2016 to address rate-making issues under REV, including opportunities for outcome-based shareholder incentive mechanisms, market-based earnings, changes to rate design, DER compensation and the rate-making process. The Company’s first five-year distributed system implementation plan is expected to be filed in June 2016 and will identify incremental investments in utility infrastructure necessary for implementation of the DSP role and greater DER integration.

 

In December 2014, we filed with the RIPUC for review and approval of our annual ISR plans for the electricity and gas systems. RIPUC approved the 2016 ISR plans on 31 March 2015. The electricity ISR plan encompasses a $73.3 million spending programme for capital investment and $12.1 million for operating and maintenance expenses for vegetation management and inspection and maintenance. The gas ISR plan encompasses $76.8 million for capital investment and incremental operation and maintenance expense for the hiring and training of additional personnel to support increases in leak-prone pipe replacement.

Rhode Island Renewable Energy Growth Program

In June 2014, the Rhode Island legislature enacted legislation to facilitate and promote installation of distributed renewable energy generation. As a result, in November 2014, we filed with RIPUC a proposal to implement the Rhode Island Renewable Energy Growth Program, which replaces our current programme and will create a feed-in-tariff (FIT) programme to support a total of 160 MW of renewable distributed generation projects over a five year period. The FIT payments will be determined via competitive solicitations for larger projects. The current programme provideslong-term contracts, or power purchase agreements, to renewable energy projects. RIPUC approved the new programme on 31 March 2015. Under Rhode Island law, we can recover the incremental costs associated with the programme and are entitled to earn incentives equal to 1.75% of the gross payments made under the FIT.

FERC

Complaints on New England transmission allowed RoE

In September 2011, December 2012 and July 2014, complaints were filed with FERC against certain transmission owners, including our New England electricity transmission business, to lower the base RoE from the FERC approved rate of 11.14%. In orders addressing the September 2011 complaint issued in June 2014, October 2014 and March 2015, FERC set the base RoE for the first complaint’s 15 month historical refund period and for a prospective period beginning in October 2014 at 10.57%. In these orders, FERC also found that the total or maximum RoE for our New England transmission business, including various RoE incentive adders authorised by FERC, cannot exceed 11.74% during these periods.

FERC has scheduled hearings on the December 2012 and July 2014 New England RoE complaints in June 2015, with non-binding preliminary findings due by the end of 2015. A FERC order acting on these preliminary findings is not expected until the end of 2016.

Complaints on New York transmission allowed RoE

In September 2012, November 2012 and February 2014, complaints were filed with FERC against our New York electricity transmission subsidiary to lower the total RoE from the FERC approved rate of 11.5% and to modify certain other aspects of our New York transmission formula rates. In September 2014, FERC set these three complaints for settlement and hearing procedures. In December 2014, we reached a settlement agreement in principle with the complainants to resolve these complaints. In May 2015, FERC approved the uncontested settlement agreement.

Short-term borrowing authorisation

In October 2014, National Grid filed an application with FERC on behalf of all electricity public utility subsidiaries, with the exception of Massachusetts Electric Company (MECo), seeking to re-establish the Commission’s authorisation to issue short-term debt, as required by Section 204 of the Federal Power Act. National Grid’s short-term borrowing authorisation had expired on 30 November 2013, as issues related to the implementation of the US enterprise resource planning system had rendered National Grid temporarily unable to provide FERC with the financial reports

 National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16 

required for such approval. FERC granted the applicationThe business in December 2014. MECo was omitted from the application because it did not satisfy the interest coverage calculation typically required for approval. National Grid intends to file on behalf of MECo as soon as practicable, and in the interim MECo’s short-term cash needs will be met through capital contributions in the form of equity.

New York Transco

On 14 November 2014, the four New York investor-owned utilities (IOUs), including Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, formed NY Transco LLC, a New York company whose sole business will be to plan, develop, construct and own major new high voltage electricity transmission projects across New York State. In early December 2014, the four IOUs and NY Transco filed on behalf of NY Transco an application with FERC to establish a formula rate, rate incentives and cost allocation for a portfolio of five new transmission projects with a combined estimated total cost of over $1.7 billion. A number of entities intervened in the docket and challenged various aspects of the application. In April 2015, FERC approved certain elements of our filing (including some rate incentives), rejected others, and set the remainder for hearing and settlement.

New England gas and electricity interdependency

The region’s electricity and gas systems have become increasingly interdependent as the region’s reliance on gas-fired electricity generation has grown without commensurate pipeline infrastructure expansion, resulting in severe constraints at certain times of the year. These constraints have restricted gas availability for generation and decreased electricity reliability. They have also resulted in significant increases to spot gas prices for electricity generation, driving significant increases to the region’s wholesale and retail electricity costs. To address this challenge, New England’s governors have established an initiative envisaging coordinated strategic infrastructure investments focused on expanding the region’s energy portfolio.

We are working with representatives from several states, other regional electricity and gas utilities, interstate gas pipelines, state regulators, and FERC in realising the governors’ goals. We have put forward structural proposals which would support the development of additional gas pipeline infrastructure to serve the region’s needs and are also developing electricity transmission proposals to increase the ability to deliver clean low carbon energy to enable a balanced solution to the region’s energy needs.

FERC Order 1000

Issued in 2011, Order 1000 was FERC’s major policy order intended to foster regional and inter-regional transmission planning, address transmission needs driven by public policy requirements and increase competition in the electric transmission industry. In 2014 and 2015, FERC issued orders on filings made by the New York and New England system operators to comply with Order 1000 and continue to implement a package of reforms addressing transmission planning and cost allocation. A federal court upheld key provisions of Order 1000 against legal challenges in an August 2014 decision. Policies to comply with Order 1000 have been in effect in New York since January 2014 and became effective in New England in May 2015. The competitive transmission planning processes instituted under Order 1000 have opened National Grid’s service territory to competition from non-incumbent transmission developers and also created opportunities for National Grid to compete for transmission projects outside of the Company’s current geographic footprint.

detail
179


The business in detailcontinued

KEDLI gas investment plan

In June 2014, KEDLI petitioned NYPSC for approval of a deferral mechanism related to a proposed gas infrastructure investment programme. In December 2014, NYPSC approved two gas investment plans for 2015 and 2016, one for leak-prone pipe capital expenditures (capped at $211.7 million in total) and one for gas service expansion expenditures (capped at $202.7 million in total).

NYPSC approved a surcharge to begin recovery of the deferred leak-prone pipeline investment costs, allowing for the recovery up to a total of $23.4 million through a surcharge effective from 1 April 2015 until the end of 2016. KEDLI received approval to establish a new deferral accounting mechanism for the balance of the approved costs not covered by the surcharge.

KEDNY gas investment plan and site investigation

and remediation (SIR) surcharge

In October 2015, NYPSC approved KEDNY’s petition to extend its capital investment recovery mechanism and reconciliation period for two more years through 2016 and to use a deferred credit balance from underspending in 2013 and 2014 to offset the revenue requirement associated with over $870 million of total capital investment in 2015 and 2016 (compared with a total capital allowance of roughly $614 million for 2013 and 2014). Also in October 2015, NYPSC approved KEDNY’s petition to increase its current SIR surcharge by $37.5 million annually, effective from 1 November 2015, to offset its SIR deferral balances.

KEDNY and KEDLI rate cases

On 29 January 2016, KEDNY and KEDLI filed base rate cases with NYPSC to increase their delivery revenues by $245 million and $142 million, respectively, with new rates expected to come into effectin early 2017. The cases include capital investment of approximately $610 million for KEDNY and $340 million for KEDLI for 2017. The rate case filings maintain tracker and true-up mechanisms for property taxes, commodity-related bad debt, and pension/OPEBs and seek to establish reconciling mechanisms for city/state construction-related costs and SIR recovery surcharge/tracker mechanisms.

KEDNY and KEDLI filed one year cases, but submitted two additional years of data to facilitate a multi-year settlement. The filings are based on a RoE of 9.94% (plus 50 basis points for a stay-out premium for a multi-year rate plan) and a 48% equity ratio.

Operations staffing audit

In January 2014, NYPSC initiated an operational audit to review internal staffing levels and use of contractors for the core utility functions of the investor owned utilities in New York, including Niagara Mohawk, KEDNY and KEDLI. The focus of the audit is on electricity and gas operations and network strategy functions, and includes a review of staffing levels, resource planning, work management, overtime levels, contractor use and succession planning. The final report is expected to be issued in July 2016.

LOGO

Rhode Island

Rhode Island electricity and gas infrastructure, safety and

reliability (ISR) plans

State law provides our Rhode Island gas and electricity operating divisions with rate mechanisms that allow for the recovery of capital investment, including a return, and certain expenses outside base rate proceedings through the submission of annual ISR plans.

RIPUC approved the fiscal year 2017 ISR plans on 25 February 2016. The electricity ISR plan encompasses an $83.4 million spending programme for capital investment and $10 million for operating and maintenance expenses for vegetation management and inspection and maintenance. The gas ISR plan encompasses $86.05 million for capital investment and incremental operation and maintenance expense for the hiring and training of additional personnel to support increases in leak-prone pipe replacement.

Changing distribution system and modernisation of rates

On 3 March 2016, RIPUC opened a docket to investigate the modernisation of rates in light of the changing electric distribution system, including the costs and benefits of distributed energy resources.

FERC

Complaints on New England transmission allowed RoE

In September 2011, December 2012 and July 2014, complaints were filed with FERC against certain transmission owners, including our New England electricity transmission business, to lower the base RoE from the FERC approved rate of 11.14%. In a series of orders addressing the first complaint, with the last order in March 2015, FERC set the prospective base RoE at 10.57%, effective October 2014. FERC also found that the total, or maximum, RoE for our New England transmission business, including various RoE incentive adders authorised by FERC, cannot exceed 11.74%. In April and May 2015 a number of parties, including the Company, appealed FERC’s orders on the first complaint to US federal court. A US federal court decision on these appeals is expected no earlier than late 2016.

On 22 March 2016, a FERC administrative law judge issued a decision with non-binding preliminary findings in the second and third complaint cases, setting the prospective base RoE at 10.9%, with a maximum RoE of 12.19%. A FERC order acting on these preliminary findings is not expected until the end of 2016 or early 2017.

On 29 April 2016, a fourth complaint was filed against the New England electricity transmission businesses seeking to reduce their base RoE and maximum RoE to 8.61% and 11.24% respectively. Resolution by FERC of this latest complaint may take two years or longer.

New York Transco

In late 2014, the four New York investor-owned utilities, including Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, formed New York Transco, LLC, a new high voltage electricity transmission development company in New York State, and filed on behalf of New York Transco an application with FERC to establish the financial terms for a portfolio of five new transmission projects with a combined estimated total cost of over $1.7 billion.

A number of entities intervened in the docket and challenged various aspects of the application. In April 2015, FERC approved certain elements of our filing (including some rate incentives), rejected others, and set the remainder for hearing and settlement. In November 2015, New York Transco reached a negotiated settlement on formula rate issues for the first three transmission projects under construction with an estimated cost of approximately $230 million.

The settlement included an RoE of 10% inclusive of 0.50% incentives. FERC approved the settlement without modification on 17 March 2016. National Grid’s ownership interest in New York Transco is 28%.

 

 

180 NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16 171Additional Information


 

Additional Information

 

The business in detailcontinued

 

 

National Grid LNG LLC

On 1 April 2016, the Company filed an application seeking FERC approval of a planned $180 million liquefaction facility at the Providence, Rhode Island, LNG plant, with a FERC decision expected by November 2016. The expected in-service date is December 2018. Rates for the new liquefaction service will be cost-based formula rates charged to customers who opt to take liquefaction service.

New England gas and electricity interdependency

New England’s gas and electricity systems have become increasingly interdependent as the region’s reliance on gas-fired electricity generation has grown without commensurate pipeline infrastructure expansion, driving significant increases in the region’s wholesale and retail electricity costs and electricity reliability concerns. To address this challenge, New England’s governors are pursuing strategic infrastructure investments focused on expanding the region’s energy portfolio.

Working with state representatives and our peer utilities, our Massachusetts and Rhode Island electricity distribution companies issued a multi-state solicitation for proposals for clean energy and associated transmission infrastructure to increase the ability to deliver low-carbon energy. Proposals were submitted on 28 January 2016, including a proposal comprised of the Vermont Green Line being developed by Anbaric and National Grid paired with renewable energy generation.

A multi-year effort in coordination with representatives from several states, other regional utilities, interstate gas pipelines, state regulators and FERC led to a filing in January 2016 in Massachusetts by our electricity distribution companies for approval of precedent agreements to enter into gas interstate pipeline and storage capacity contracts with the Access Northeast pipeline project sponsored by Spectra Energy. The Company also plans to make a filing in Rhode Island in mid 2016 seeking approval of a similar contract on behalf of Narragansett Electric Company.

With these contracts, our electricity distribution companies will secure incremental pipeline capacity to release to electricity generators that will both improve electricity reliability and lower electricity costs for customers. National Grid is a co-developer, with a 20% stake, of the Access Northeast project.

Formula rate transparency 206 proceeding

On 28 December 2015, FERC initiated a proceeding against National Grid and other New England transmission owners under Section 206 of the Federal Power Act. FERC found that the tariff governing electricity transmission service in New England lacks adequate transparency and challenge procedures with regard to the formula rates through which the Company recovers its costs and that the formula rates appear to lack sufficient detail regarding certain costs recovered. The parties are currently involved in settlement negotiations to develop formula rate protocols and to address FERC’s concerns about specific elements of the formula rate.

FERC financial audit of National Grid USA and affiliates

On 24 November 2015, FERC commenced a financial audit of National Grid USA, including its service companies and other affiliates, which covers the period from 1 January 2013 to the present. The audit will evaluate compliance with the FERC’s accounting, record keeping and reporting requirements as well as interactions among the service companies and affiliated operating companies. Based on past audits, we expect the audit to last about 18 months.

FERC Order 1000

Issued in 2011, Order 1000 was FERC’s major policy order intended to foster regional and inter-regional transmission planning, address transmission needs driven by public policy requirements and increase competition in the electricity transmission industry. Policies to comply with Order 1000 have been in effect in New York and New England since January 2014 and May 2015 respectively. The competitive transmission planning processes instituted under Order 1000 have opened National Grid’s service territory to competition from non-incumbent transmission developers and also created opportunities for National Grid to compete for transmission projects outside of the Company’s current geographic footprint.

In the first applications of the Order 1000 planning and competitive solicitation processes in New York or New England, NYPSC has identified two transmission needs in New York driven by public policy goals. The first, in western New York, is intended to relieve congestion and to maximise hydropower and Ontario imports. In December 2015, National Grid submitted two competitive transmission proposals for projects to address the need in western New York. In addition, NYPSC identified a transmission need to allow greater flow of power from upstate to downstate New York. Competitive proposals to meet this transmission need were solicited in February 2016. National Grid submitted a competitive transmission proposal in April 2016, with project selection expected in 2016.

 

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16The business in detail181


The business in detailcontinued

Summary of US price controls and rate plans

LOGO

Summary of US price controls and rate plans

LOGO

Revenue decoupling

A mechanism that removes the link between a utility’s revenue and sales volume so that the utility is indifferent to changes in usage. Revenues are reconciled to a revenue target, with differences billed or credited to customers. Allows the utility to support energy efficiency.

 

Capital tracker

A mechanism that allows for the recovery of the revenue requirement of incremental capital investment above that embedded in base rates, including depreciation, property taxes and a return on the incremental investment.

  

§Commodity-related bad debt true-up

A mechanism that allows a utility to reconcile commodity-related bad debt to either actual commodity-related bad debt or to a specified commodity-related bad debt write-off percentage. For electricity utilities, this mechanism also includes working capital.

 

¯Pension/OPEB true-up

A mechanism that reconciles the actual non-capitalised costs of pension and OPEB and the actual amount recovered in base rates. The difference may be amortised and recovered over a period or deferred for a future rate case.

 

       172182National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Additional Information 


 

 

Internal control and risk factors   Additional Information

 

 

Internal control and risk factors

 

Disclosure controls

Working with management, including the Chief Executive and Finance Director, we have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as at 31 March 2016. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives. However, the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures has limitations, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures.

Even effective disclosure controls and procedures provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives. Based on the evaluation, the Chief Executive and Finance Director concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures are effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file and submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarised and reported as and when required and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the Chief Executive and Finance Director,  as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure.

Internal control over financial reporting

Our management, including the Chief Executive and Finance Director, has carried out an evaluation of our internal control over financial reporting pursuant to the Disclosure Rules and Transparency Rules and Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002. As required by Section 404, management is responsible for establishing and maintaining an adequate system of internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a–15(f) and 15d–15(f) under the Exchange Act).

Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was based on the revised Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as at 31 March 2016.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, which has audited our consolidated financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2016, has also audited the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Their attestation report can be found on page 93.

During the year, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, it.

Risk factors

Management of our risks is an important part of our internal control environment, as we describe on pages 26 to 29. In addition to the principal risks listed we face a number of inherent risks that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and reputation, as well as the value and liquidity of our securities.

Any investment decision regarding our securities and any forward-looking statements made by us should be considered in the light of these risk factors and the cautionary statement set out on the inside back cover. An overview of the key inherent risks we face is provided below.

Risk factors

 

Disclosure controls

Working with management, including the Chief Executive and Finance Director, we have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as at 31 March 2015. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives, however, the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures has limitations including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures.

Even effective disclosure controls and procedures provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives. Based on the evaluation, the Chief Executive and Finance Director concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures are effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file and submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarised and reported as and when required and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the Chief Executive and Finance Director, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure.

Internal control over financial reporting

Our management, including the Chief Executive and Finance Director, has carried out an evaluation of our internal control over financial reporting pursuant to the Disclosure and Transparency Rules and Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002. As required by Section 404, management is responsible for establishing and maintaining an adequate system of internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act).

Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was based on the revised Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as at 31 March 2015.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, which has audited our consolidated financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2015, has also audited the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Their attestation report can be found on page 85.

During the year, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, it.

Risk factors

Management of our risks is an important part of our internal control environment, as we describe on pages 38 to 41. In addition to the principal risks listed we face a number of inherent risks that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and reputation, as well as the value and liquidity of our securities.

Any investment decision regarding our securities and any forward-looking statements made by us should be considered in the light of these risk factors and the cautionary statement set out on the inside back cover. An overview of the key inherent risks we face is provided below.

Risk factors

Potentially harmful activities

  

Aspects of the work we do could potentially harm employees, contractors, members of the public or the environment.

Potentially hazardous activities that arise in connection with our business include the generation, transmission and distribution of electricity and the storage, transmission and distribution of gas.

 

Electricity and gas utilities also typically use and generate hazardous and potentially hazardous products andby-products. In addition, there may be other aspects of our operations that are not currently regarded or proved to have adverse effects but could become so, such as the effects of electric and magnetic fields.

 

A significant safety or environmental incident, or the failure of our safety processes or of our occupational health plans, as well as the breach of our regulatory or contractual obligations or our climate change targets, could materially adversely affect our results of operations and our reputation.

 

We commit significant resources and expenditure to process safety and to monitoring personal safety, occupational health and environmental performance, and to meeting our obligations under negotiated settlements.

 

We are subject to laws and regulations in the UK and US governing health and safety matters to protect the public and our employees and contractors, who could potentially be harmed by these activities as well as laws and regulations relating to pollution, the protection of the environment, and the use and disposal of hazardous substances and waste materials.

 

These expose us to costs and liabilities relating to our operations and properties, including those inherited from predecessor bodies, whether currently or formerly owned by us, and sites used for the disposal of our waste.

 

The cost of future environmental remediation obligations is often inherently difficult to estimate and uncertainties can include the extent of contamination, the appropriate corrective actions and our share of the liability. We are increasingly subject to regulation in relation to climate change and are affected by requirements to reduce our own carbon emissions as well as to enable reduction in energy use by our customers.

 

If more onerous requirements are imposed or our ability to recover these costs under regulatory frameworks changes, this could have a material adverse impact on our business, reputation, results of operations and financial position.

 

 

LOGO

 

 NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16 173


Additional Information

Internal control and risk factorscontinued

 183


 

Internal control and risk factorscontinued

    

    

 

Risk factors

Infrastructure and IT systems

      

 

We may suffer a major network failure or interruption, or may not be able to carry out critical operations due to the failure of infrastructure, data or technology or a lack of supply.

Operational performance could be materially adversely affected by a failure to maintain the health of our assets or networks, inadequate forecasting of demand, inadequate record keeping or control of data or failure of information systems and supporting technology.

 

This in turn could cause us to fail to meet agreed standards of service, incentive and reliability targets, or be in breach of a licence, approval, regulatory requirement or contractual obligation. Even incidents that do not amount to a breach could result in adverse regulatory and financial consequences, as well as harming our reputation.

 

Where demand for electricity or gas exceeds supply and our balancing mechanisms are not able to mitigate this fully, a lack of supply to consumers may damage our reputation.

 

In addition to these risks, we may be affected by other potential events that are largely outside our control, such as the impact of weather (including as a result of climate change and major storms), unlawful or unintentional acts of third parties, insufficient or unreliable supply or force majeure.

   

Weather conditions can affect financial performance and severe weather that causes outages or damages infrastructure together with our actual or perceived response could materially adversely affect operational and potentially business performance and our reputation.

 

Malicious attack, sabotage or other intentional acts, including breaches of our cyber security, may also damage our assets (which include critical national infrastructure) or otherwise significantly affect corporate activities and, as a consequence, have a material adverse impact on our reputation, business, results of operations and financial condition.

 

Unauthorised access to, or deliberate breaches of, our IT systems may also lead to manipulation of our proprietary business data or customer information.

 

Unauthorised access to private customer information may make us liable for a violation of data privacy regulations. Even where we establish business continuity controls and security against threats against our systems, these may not be sufficient.

Law and regulation

 

Law and regulation

Changes in law or regulation or decisions by governmental bodies or regulators could materially adversely affect us.

Most of our businesses are utilities or networks subject to regulation by governments and other authorities. Changes in law or regulation or regulatory policy and precedent, including decisions of governmental bodies or regulators, in the countries or states in which we operate could materially adversely affect us.

 

If we fail to engage in the energy policy debate, we may not be able to influence future energy policy and deliver our strategy.

 

Decisions or rulings concerning, for example:

   

advancing energy technologies, whether aspects of our activities are contestable, the level of permitted revenues and dividend distributions for our businesses and in relation to proposed business development activities,

could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations, cash flows, the financial condition of our businesses and the ability to develop those businesses in the future.

 

Following the introduction of EMR, there has been an increased focus (from some of our stakeholders) on the potential conflicting duties of our transmission and system operator roles, which may damage our reputation.

 

The remediation plans in place or being implemented to address control weaknesses in our US business may not operate as expected, as a result of which we may be unable to provide timely regulatory reporting, which may include the provision of financial statements. This could result in the imposition of regulatory fines, penalties and other sanctions, which could impact our operations, our reputation and our relationship with our regulators and other stakeholders.

 

For further information see pages 166176 to 172,182, which explain our regulatory environment in detail.

 

(i)

 

whether licences, approvals or agreements to operate or supply are granted, amended or renewed, whether consents for construction projects are granted in a timely manner or whether there has been any breach of the terms of a licence, approval or regulatory requirement; and

   

(ii)

 

timely recovery of incurred expenditure or obligations, the ability to pass through commodity costs, a decoupling of energy usage and revenue, and other decisions relating to the impact of general economic conditions on us, our markets and customers, implications of climate change and of advancing energy

   
Business performance    

Business performance

 

Current and future business performance may not meet our expectations or those of our regulators and shareholders.

Earnings maintenance and growth from our regulated gas and electricity businesses will be affected by our ability to meet or exceed efficiency targets and service quality standards set by, or agreed with, our regulators.

   

If we do not meet these targets and standards, or if we do not implement the transformation projects we are carrying out as envisaged, including to our US enterprise resource planning systems and controls over financial reporting, or are not able to deliver our RIIO operating model and the US Elevate 2018rate plans strategy successfully, we may not achieve the expected benefits, our business may be materially adversely affected and our performance, results of operations and reputation may be materially harmed and we may be in breach of regulatory or contractual obligations.

 

 

 

     174184National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Additional Information 


 

   Additional Information

 

 

 

Risk factors

Growth and business development activity

  

Failure to respond to external market developments and execute our growth strategy may negatively affect our performance. Conversely, new businesses or activities that we undertake alone or with partners may not deliver target outcomes and may expose us to additional operational and financial risk.

Failure to grow our core business sufficiently and have viable options for new future business over the longer term or failure to respond to the threats and opportunities presented by emerging technology (including for the purposes of adapting our networks to meet the challenges of increasing distributed energy resources) could negatively affect the Group’s credibility and reputation and jeopardise the achievement of intended financial returns.

 

BusinessOur business development activities and the delivery of our growth ambition, includinginclude acquisitions, disposals, joint ventures, partnering and organic investment opportunities (including organic investments madesuch as a result ofdevelopment activities relating to changes to the energy mix),mix and the integration of distributed energy resources and other advanced technologies. These are subject to a wide range of both external uncertainties (including the

availability of potential investment targets and

attractive financing and the impact of competition for onshore transmission in both the UK and US), and internal uncertainties (including actual performance of our various existing operating companies and our business planning model assumptions and ability to integrate acquired businesses effectively). As a result, we may suffer unanticipated costs and liabilities and other unanticipated effects.

 

We may also be liable for the past acts, omissions or liabilities of companies or businesses we have acquired, which may be unforeseen or greater than anticipated. In the case of joint ventures, we may have limited control over operations and our joint venture partners may have interests that diverge from our own.

 

The occurrence of any of these events could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations or financial condition, and could also impact our ability to enter into other transactions.

Cost escalation

  

Changes in foreign currency rates, interest rates or commodity prices could materially impact earnings or our financial condition.

We have significant operations in the US and so are subject to the exchange rate risks normally associated with non UK operations, including the need to translate US assets and liabilities, and income and expenses, into sterling, our primary reporting currency.

 

In addition, our results of operations and net debt position may be affected because a significant proportion of our borrowings, derivative financial instruments and commodity contracts are

 

affected by changes in interest rates, commodity price indices and exchange rates, in particular the dollar to sterling exchange rate.

 

Furthermore, our cash flow may be materially affected as a result of settling hedging arrangements entered into to manage our exchange rate, interest rate and commodity price exposure, or by cash collateral movements relating to derivative market values, which also depend on the sterling exchange rate into euro and other currencies.

Our results of operations could be affected by inflation or deflation.

In our regulated UK networks, our allowed revenues are set in real terms and then adjusted for actual RPI inflation. There is a risk that inflationary impacts on our costs are higher than RPI inflation and are not fully compensated by this inflation adjustment to revenues. There is also a risk that year-on-year RPI inflation is negative with no corresponding decrease in costs or insufficient decrease to offset the impact on revenues.

 

Our income under our rate plans in the US is not typically linked to inflation. In periods of inflation in the US, our operating costs may increase by more than our revenues. In both the UK and US such increased costs may materially adversely affect the results of our operations.

We may be required to make significant contributions to fund pension and other post-retirement benefits.

We participate in a number of pension schemes that together cover substantially all our employees. In both the UK and US, the principal schemes are DB schemes where the scheme assets are held independently of our own financial resources.

 

In the US, we also have other post-retirement benefit schemes. Estimates of the amount and timing of future funding for the UK and US schemes are based on actuarial assumptions and other factors, including: the actual and projected market performance of the scheme assets; future long-term bond yields; average life expectancies; and relevant legal requirements.

 

Actual performance of scheme assets may be affected by volatility in debt and equity markets.

 

Changes in these assumptions or other factors may require us to make additional contributions to these pension schemes which, to the extent they are not recoverable under our price controls or state rate plans, could materially adversely affect the results of our operations and financial condition.

 National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Internal control and risk factors185


    

LOGO

Internal control and risk factorscontinued

 

Financing and liquidity NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15175


     Additional Information

   Internal control and risk factorscontinued

Risk factors

Financing and liquidity

  

An inability to access capital markets at commercially acceptable interest rates could affect how we maintain and grow our businesses.

Our businesses are financed through cash generated from our ongoing operations, bank lending facilities and the capital markets, particularly the long-term debt capital markets.

 

Some of the debt we issue is rated by credit rating agencies and changes to these ratings may affect both our borrowing capacity and borrowing costs. In addition, restrictions imposed by regulators may also limit how we service the financial requirements of our current businesses or the financing of newly acquired or developing businesses.

 

Financial markets can be subject to periods of volatility and shortages of liquidity. If we were unable to access the capital markets or other sources of finance at competitive rates for a prolonged period, our cost of financing may increase, the discretionary and uncommitted elements of our proposed capital investment programme may need to be reconsidered and the manner in which we implement our strategy may need to be reassessed.

 

Such events could have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations and prospects.

 

Some of our regulatory agreements impose lower limits for the long-term senior unsecured debt credit ratings that certain companies within the Group must hold or the amount of equity within their capital structures.

 

One of the principal limits requires National Grid plc to hold an investment grade long-term senior unsecured debt credit rating. In addition, some of our regulatory arrangements impose restrictions on the way we can operate.

 

These include regulatory requirements for us to maintain adequate financial resources within certain parts of our operating businesses and may restrict the ability of National Grid plc and some of our subsidiaries to engage in certain transactions, including paying dividends, lending cash and levying charges.

 

The inability to meet such requirements or the occurrence of any such restrictions may have a material adverse impact on our business and financial condition.

 

The remediation plans in place or being implemented to address control weaknesses in our US business may not operate as expected, as a result of which we may be unable to provide accurate financial information to our debt investors in a timely manner.

 

Our debt agreements and banking facilities contain covenants, including those relating to the periodic and timely provision of financial information by the issuing entity and financial covenants, such as restrictions on the level of subsidiary indebtedness.

 

Failure to comply with these covenants, or to obtain waivers of those requirements, could in some cases trigger a right, at the lender’s discretion, to require repayment of some of our debt and may restrict our ability to draw upon our facilities or access the capital markets.

 

Customers and counterparties

  

Customers and counterparties may not perform their obligations.

Our operations are exposed to the risk that customers, suppliers, banks and other financial institutions and others with whom we do business will not satisfy their obligations, which could materially adversely affect our financial position.

 

This risk is significant where our subsidiaries have concentrations of receivables from gas and electricity utilities and their affiliates, such as from our previous LIPA managed services agreement (MSA) and current PSEG-LI transition services agreement, (TSA), as well as industrial customers and other purchasers, and may also arise where customers are unable to pay us as a result of increasing commodity prices or adverse economic conditions.

 

 

To the extent that counterparties are contracted with for physical commodities (gas and electricity) and they experience events that impact their own ability to deliver, we may suffer supply interruption as described inInfrastructure and IT systems on page 174.184.

 

There is also a risk to us where we invest excess cash or enter into derivatives and other financial contracts with banks or other financial institutions. Banks who provide us with credit facilities may also fail to perform under those contracts.

Employees and others

  

We may fail to attract, develop and retain employees with the competencies, including leadership and business capabilities, values and behaviours required to deliver our strategy and vision and ensure they are engaged to act in our best interests.

Our ability to implement our strategy depends on the capabilities and performance of our employees and leadership at all levels of the business. Our ability to implement our strategy and vision may be negatively affected by the loss of key personnel or an inability to attract, integrate, engage and retain appropriately qualified

personnel, or if significant disputes arise with our employees.

As a result, there may be a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

 

There is a risk that an employee or someone acting on our behalf may breach our internal controls or internal governance framework or may contravene applicable laws and regulations. This could have an impact on the results of our operations, our reputation and our relationship with our regulators and other stakeholders.

 

       176


Shareholder information

 

186 

Articles of Association

The following description is a summary of the material terms of our Articles and applicable English law. It is a summary only and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Articles.

Summary

The Articles set out the Company’s internal regulations. Copies are available on our website and upon request. Amendments to the Articles have to be approved by at least 75% of those voting at a general meeting of the Company. Subject to company law and the Articles, the Directors may exercise all the powers of the Company. They may delegate authorities to committees and day-to-day management and decision-making to individual Executive Directors. The committee structure is set out on page 49.

General

The Company is incorporated under the name National Grid plcAnnual Report and is registered in England and Wales with registered number 04031152. Under the Companies Act 2006, the Company’s objects are unrestricted.

Directors

Under the Articles, a Director must disclose any personal interest in a matter and may not vote in respect of that matter, subject to certain limited exceptions. As permitted under the Companies Act 2006, the Articles allow non conflicted Directors of the Company to authorise a conflict or potential conflict for a particular matter. In doing so, the non conflicted Directors must act in a way they consider, in good faith, will be most likely to promote the success of the Company for the benefit of the shareholders as a whole.

The Directors (other than a Director acting in an executive capacity) are paid fees for their services. In total, these fees must not exceed £2,000,000 a year or any higher sum decided by an ordinary resolution at a general meeting of shareholders. In addition, special pay may be awarded to a Director who acts in an executive capacity, serves on a committee, performs services which the Directors consider to extend beyond the ordinary duties of a Director, devotes special attention to the business of National Grid, or goes or lives abroad on the Company’s behalf. Directors may also receive reimbursement for expenses properly incurred, and may be awarded pensions and other benefits. The compensation awarded to the Executive Directors is determined by the Remuneration Committee. Further details of Directors’ remuneration are set out in the Directors’ Remuneration Report (see pages 60 to 75).

The Directors may exercise all the powers of National Grid to borrow money. However, the aggregate principal amount of all the Group’s borrowings outstanding at any time must not exceed £35 billion or any other amount approved by shareholders by an ordinary resolution at a general meeting.

Directors can be appointed or removed by the Board or shareholders in a general meeting. Directors must stand for election at the first AGM following their appointment to the Board. Each Director must retire at least every three years, although they will be eligible for re-election. In accordance with best practice introduced by the UK Corporate Governance Code, all Directors wishing to continue in office currently offer themselves for re-election annually. No person is disqualified from being a Director or is required to vacate that office by reason of attaining a maximum age.

A Director is not required to hold shares in National Grid in order to qualify as a Director.

Accounts 2015/16
 Additional Information


 

 

   Additional Information

Shareholder information

Articles of Association

The following description is a summary of the material terms of our Articles and applicable English law. It is a summary only and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Articles.

Summary

The Articles set out the Company’s internal regulations. Copies are available on our website and upon request. Amendments to the Articles have to be approved by at least 75% of those voting at a general meeting of the Company. Subject to company law and the Articles, the Directors may exercise all the powers of the Company. They may delegate authorities to committees and day-to-day management and decision-making to individual Executive Directors. The committee structure is set out on page 49.

General

The Company is incorporated under the name National Grid plc and is registered in England and Wales with registered number 04031152. Under the Companies Act 2006, the Company’s objects are unrestricted.

Directors

Under the Articles, a Director must disclose any personal interest in a matter and may not vote in respect of that matter, subject to certain limited exceptions. As permitted under the Companies Act 2006, the Articles allow non conflicted Directors of the Company to authorise a conflict or potential conflict for a particular matter. In doing so, the non conflicted Directors must act in a way they consider, in good faith, will be most likely to promote the success of the Company for the benefit of the shareholders as a whole.

The Directors (other than a Director acting in an executive capacity) are paid fees for their services. In total, these fees must not exceed £2,000,000 a year or any higher sum decided by an ordinary resolution at a general meeting of shareholders. In addition, special pay may be awarded to a Director who acts in an executive capacity, serves on a committee, performs services which the Directors consider to extend beyond the ordinary duties of a Director, devotes special attention to the business of National Grid, or goes or lives abroad on the Company’s behalf. Directors may also receive reimbursement for expenses properly incurred, and may be awarded pensions and other benefits. The compensation awarded to the Executive Directors is determined by the Remuneration Committee. Further details of Directors’ remuneration are set out in the Directors’ Remuneration Report (see page 68 to 81).

The Directors may exercise all the powers of National Grid to borrow money. However, the aggregate principal amount of all the Group’s borrowings outstanding at any time must not exceed £35 billion or any other amount approved by shareholders by an ordinary resolution at a general meeting.

Directors can be appointed or removed by the Board or shareholders in a general meeting. Directors must stand for election at the first AGM following their appointment to the Board. Each Director must retire at least every three years, although they will be eligible for re-election. In accordance with best practice introduced by the UK Corporate Governance Code, all Directors wishing to continue in office currently offer themselves for re-election annually. No person is disqualified from being a Director or is required to vacate that office by reason of attaining a maximum age.

A Director is not required to hold shares in National Grid in order to qualify as a Director.

Rights, preferences and restrictions

(i) Dividend rights

National Grid may not pay any dividend otherwise than out of profits available for distribution under the Companies Act 2006 and other applicable provisions of English law. In addition, as a public company, National Grid may only make a distribution if, at the time of the distribution, the amount of its net assets is not less than the aggregate of its called up share capital and undistributable reserves (as defined in the Companies Act 2006) and to the extent that the distribution does not reduce the amount of those assets to less than that aggregate. Ordinary shareholders and ADS holders receive dividends.

Subject to these points, shareholders may, by ordinary resolution, declare dividends in accordance with the respective rights of the shareholders, but not exceeding the amount recommended by the Board. The Board may pay interim dividends if it considers that National Grid’s financial position justifies the payment. Any dividend or interest unclaimed for 12 years from the date when it was declared or became due for payment will be forfeited and revert to National Grid.

(ii) Voting rights

Subject to any rights or restrictions attached to any shares and to any other provisions of the Articles, at any general meeting on a show of hands, every shareholder who is present in person will have one vote and on a poll, every shareholder will have one vote for every share they hold. On a show of hands or poll, shareholders may cast votes either personally or by proxy. A proxy need not be a shareholder. Under the Articles, all substantive resolutions at a general meeting must be decided on a poll. Ordinary shareholders and ADS holders can vote at general meetings.

(iii) Liquidation rights

In a winding up, a liquidator may (in each case with the sanction of a special resolution passed by the shareholders and any other sanction required under English law): (a) divide among the shareholders the whole or any part of National Grid’s assets (whether the assets are of the same kind or not); the liquidator may, for this purpose, value any assets and determine how the division should be carried out as between shareholders or different classes of shareholders, or (b) transfer any part of the assets to trustees on trust for the benefit of the shareholders as the liquidator determines. In neither case will a shareholder be compelled to accept assets upon which there is a liability.

(iv) Restrictions

There are no restrictions on the transfer or sale of ordinary shares. Some of the Company’s employee share plans, details of which are contained in the Directors’ Remuneration Report, include restrictions on the transfer of shares while the shares are subject to the plan. Where, under an employee share plan operated by the Company, participants are the beneficial owners of the shares but not the registered owner, the voting rights may be exercised by the registered owner at the direction of the participant. Treasury shares do not attract a vote or dividends.

Variation of rights

Subject to applicable provisions of English law, the rights attached to any class of shares of National Grid may be varied or cancelled. This must be with the written consent of the holders of three quarters in nominal value of the issued shares of that class, or with the sanction of a special resolution passed at a separate meeting of the holders of the shares of that class.

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Shareholder information187


Shareholder informationcontinued

General meetings

AGMs must be convened each year within six months of the Company’s accounting reference date upon 21 clear days’ advance written notice. Under the Articles, any other general meeting may be convened provided at least 14 clear days’ written notice is given, subject to annual approval of shareholders. In certain limited circumstances, the Company can convene a general meeting by shorter notice. The notice must specify, among other things, the nature of the business to be transacted, the place, the date and the time of the meeting.

Rights of non residents

There are no restrictions under the Articles that would limit the rights of persons not resident in the UK to vote in relation to ordinary shares.

Disclosure of interests

Under the Companies Act 2006, National Grid may, by written notice, require a person whom it has reasonable cause to believe to be or to have been, in the last three years, interested in its shares to provide additional information relating to that interest. Under the Articles, failure to provide such information may result in a shareholder losing their rights to attend, vote or exercise any other right in relation to shareholders’ meetings.

Under the UK Disclosure Rules and Transparency Rules, there is also an obligation on a person who acquires or ceases to have a notifiable interest in shares in National Grid to notify the Company of that fact. The disclosure threshold is 3% and disclosure is required each time the person’s direct and indirect holdings reach, exceed or fall below each 1% threshold thereafter.

The UK City Code on Takeovers and Mergers imposes strict disclosure requirements with regard to dealings in the securities of an offeror or offeree company, and also on their respective associates, during the course of an offer period. Other regulators in the UK, US and elsewhere may have, or assert, notification or approval rights over acquisitions or transfers of shares.

Depositary payments to the Company

The Depositary reimburses the Company for certain expenses it incurs in relation to the ADS programme. The Depositary also pays the standard out-of-pocket maintenance costs for the ADSs, which consist of the expenses for the mailing of annual and interim financial reports, printing and distributing dividend cheques, electronic filing of US federal tax information, mailing required tax forms, stationery, postage, facsimile and telephone calls. It also reimburses the Company for certain investor relationship programmes or special investor relations promotional activities. There are limits on the amount of expenses for which the Depositary will reimburse the Company, but the amount of reimbursement is not necessarily tied to the amount of fees the Depositary collects from investors. For the period 1 April 2015 to 18 May 2016, the Company received a total of $1,948,523.97 in reimbursements from the Depositary consisting of $1,277,966.88 and $670,557.09 received in October 2015 and February 2016 respectively. Fees that are charged on cash dividends will be apportioned between the Depositary and the Company, see below.

Any questions from ADS holders should be directed to The Bank of New York Mellon at the contact details on page 207.

Description of securities other than equity securities: depositary fees and charges

The Bank of New York Mellon, as the Depositary, collects fees, by deducting those fees from the amounts distributed or by selling a portion of distributable property, for:

delivery and surrender of ADSs directly from investors depositing shares or surrendering ADSs for the purpose of withdrawal or from intermediaries acting for them; and
making distributions to investors (including, it is expected, cash dividends).

The Depositary may generally refuse to provide fee attracting services until its fees for those services are paid.

Persons depositing or
withdrawing shares must pay:For

$5.00 per 100 ADSs (or portion of 100 ADSs)Issuance of ADSs, including issuances resulting from a distribution of shares or rights or other property; cancellation of ADSs for the purpose of withdrawal, including if the Deposit Agreement terminates; and distribution of securities distributed to holders of deposited securities that are distributed by the Depositary to ADS holders.

Registration or transfer feesTransfer and registration of shares on our share register to or from the name of the Depositary or its agent when they deposit or withdraw shares.

Expenses of the DepositaryCable, telex and facsimile transmissions (when expressly provided in the Deposit Agreement); and converting foreign currency to dollars.

Taxes and other governmental charges the Depositary or the Custodian has to pay on any ADS or share underlying an ADS, for example, stock transfer taxes, stamp duty or withholding taxesAs necessary.

The Company’s Deposit Agreement under which the ADSs are issued allows a fee of up to $0.05 per ADS to be charged for any cash distribution made to ADS holders, including cash dividends. ADS holders who receive cash in relation to the 2015/16 final dividend will be charged a fee of $0.02 per ADS by the Depositary prior to distribution of the cash dividend.

Documents on display

National Grid is subject to the filing requirements of the Exchange Act, as amended. In accordance with these requirements, we file reports and other information with the SEC. These materials, including this document, may be inspected during normal business hours at our registered office 1–3 Strand, London WC2N 5EH or at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. For further information about the Public Reference Room, please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Some of our filings are also available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

Events after the reporting period

There have been no material events affecting the Company since the year end.

Exchange controls

There are currently no UK laws, decrees or regulations that restrict the export or import of capital, including, but not limited to, foreign exchange control restrictions, or that affect the remittance of dividends, interest or other payments to non UK resident holders of ordinary shares except as otherwise set out in Taxation on page 190 and except in respect of the governments of and/or certain citizens, residents or bodies of certain countries (described in applicable Bank of England Notices or European Union Council Regulations in force as at the date of this document).

188    National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Additional Information


   Additional Information

Exchange rates

The following table shows the history of the exchange rates of one pound sterling to dollars for the periods indicated.

   

 Dollar equivalent of £1 sterling

 
   

 

High

   

 

Low 

 

 

 

April 2016

   1.4650     1.4086   

March 2016

   1.4514     1.3925   

February 2016

   1.4592     1.3862   

January 2016

   1.4689     1.4135   

December 2015

   1.5211     1.4795   

 

 
       

 

Average1 

 

 

 

2015/16

     1.51   

2014/15

     1.61   

2013/14

     1.60   

2012/13

     1.57   

2011/12

     1.60   

 

 

1.The average for each period is calculated by using the average of the exchange rates on the last day of each month during the period. See weighted average exchange rate on page 95.

Material interests in shares

As at 31 March 2016, National Grid had been notified of the following holdings in voting rights of 3% or more in the issued share capital of the Company:

   Number of ordinary shares   % of voting rights1  

 

 

Black Rock, Inc.

   220,432,122     5.88   

 

Competrol International Investments Limited

   149,414,285     3.98   

 

The Capital Group Companies, Inc.

   145,094,617     3.88   

 

 

1.This number is calculated in relation to the issued share capital at the time of the distribution, the amount of its net assets is not less than the aggregate of its called up share capital and undistributable reserves (as defined in the Companies Act 2006) and to the extent that the distribution does not reduce the amount of those assets to less than that aggregate. Ordinary shareholders and ADS holders receive dividends.

Subject to these points, shareholders may, by ordinary resolution, declare dividends in accordance with the respective rights of the shareholders, but not exceeding the amount recommended by the Board. The Board may pay interim dividends if it considers that National Grid’s financial position justifies the payment. Any dividend or interest unclaimed for 12 years from the date when itholding was declared or became due for payment will be forfeited and revert to National Grid.

(ii) Voting rights

Subject to any rights or restrictions attached to any shares and to any other provisions of the Articles, at any general meeting on a show of hands, every shareholder who is present in person will have one vote and on a poll, every shareholder will have one vote for every share they hold. On a show of hands or poll, shareholders may cast votes either personally or by proxy. A proxy need not be a shareholder. Under the Articles, all substantive resolutions at a general meeting must be decided on a poll. Ordinary shareholders and ADS holders can vote at general meetings.

(iii) Liquidation rights

In a winding up, a liquidator may, in each case with the sanction of a special resolution passed by the shareholders and any other sanction required under English law, (a) divide among the shareholders the whole or any part of National Grid’s assets (whether the assets are of the same kind or not); the liquidator may, for this purpose, value any assets and determine how the division should be carried out as between shareholders or different classes of shareholders, or (b) transfer any part of the assets to trustees on trust for the benefit of the shareholders as the liquidator determines. In neither case will a shareholder be compelled to accept assets upon which there is a liability.

(iv) Restrictions

There are no restrictions on the transfer or sale of ordinary shares. Some of the Company’s employee share plans, details of which are contained in the Directors’ Remuneration Report, include restrictions on the transfer of shares while the shares are subject to the plan. Where, under an employee share plan operated by the Company, participants are the beneficial owners of the shares but not the registered owner, the voting rights may be exercised by the registered owner at the direction of the participant. Treasury shares do not attract a vote or dividends.

Variation of rights

Subject to applicable provisions of English law, the rights attached to any class of shares of National Grid may be varied or cancelled. This must be with the written consent of the holders of three quarters in nominal value of the issued shares of that class, or with the sanction of a special resolution passed at a separate meeting of the holders of the shares of that class.

disclosed.

As at 18 May 2016, no further notifications have been received.

The rights attached to ordinary shares are detailed on page 187. All ordinary shares and all major shareholders have the same voting rights. The Company is not, to the best of its knowledge, directly or indirectly controlled.

Share capital

The share capital of the Company consists of ordinary shares of 11 1743 pence nominal value each and ADRs, which represent five ordinary shares each.

Authority to purchase shares

Shareholder approval was given at the 2015 AGM to purchase up to 10% of the Company’s share capital (being 374,138,605 ordinary shares). The Directors intend to seek shareholder approval to renew this authority at this year’s AGM.

In some circumstances, the Company may find it advantageous to have the authority to purchase its own shares in the market, where the Directors believe this would be in the interests of shareholders generally. The Directors believe that it is an important part of the financial management of the Company to have the flexibility to repurchase issued shares in order to manage its capital base, including actively managing share issuances from the operation of the scrip dividend scheme. It is expected that repurchases to manage share issuances under the scrip dividend scheme will not exceed 2.5% of the issued share capital (excluding treasury shares) per annum.

When purchasing shares, the Company has, and will continue to, take into account market conditions prevailing at the time, other investment and financing opportunities and the overall financial position of the Company.

During the year the Company purchased ordinary shares in the capital of the Company as part of the management of the dilutive effect of share issuances under the scrip dividend scheme.

   

Number

of shares

   

Total

nominal

value

   

Percentage  

of called up  

share capital1  

 

 

 

Shares held in Treasury purchased in prior years

 

   152,945,477     £17,428,670.63     3.90 %   

Shares purchased and held in Treasury during the year2,3

 

   31,690,010     £3,611,187.19     0.81 %   

Shares transferred from Treasury during the year (to employees under employee share plans)2

 

   5,090,406     £580,069.52     0.13 %   

Maximum number of shares held in Treasury during the year2

   179,065,924     £20,405,186.69     4.56 %   

 

 

1.  Called up share capital of 3,924,038,086 ordinary shares as at the date of this Report.

2.  From 29 June 2015 to 31 March 2016.

3.  Shares purchased for a total cost of £267,109,568.

During the period from 1 April 2016 to 7 April 2016 the Company purchased 657,000 ordinary shares in the capital of the Company.

As at the date of this Report, the Company held 177,211,465 ordinary shares as treasury shares, representing 4.52% of the Company’s called up share capital.

LOGO

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Shareholder information189


Shareholder informationcontinued

Authority to allot shares

Shareholder approval was given at the 2015 AGM to allot shares of up to one third of the Company’s share capital. The Directors are seeking this same level of authority this year. The Directors consider that the Company will have sufficient flexibility with this level of authority to respond to market developments. This authority is in line with investor guidelines.

The Directors currently have no intention of issuing new shares, or of granting rights to subscribe for or convert any security into shares, except in relation to, or in connection with, the operation and management of the Company’s scrip dividend scheme and the exercise of options under the Company’s share plans. No issue of shares will be made which would effectively alter control of the Company without the sanction of shareholders in general meeting.

The Company expects to actively manage the dilutive effect of share issuance arising from the operation of the scrip dividend scheme. In some circumstances, additional shares may be allotted to the market for this purpose under the authority provided by this resolution. Under these unlikely circumstances, it is expected that the associated allotment of new shares (or rights to subscribe for or convert any security into shares) will not exceed 1% of the issued share capital (excluding treasury shares) per year.

Dividend waivers

The trustees of the National Grid Employees Share Trust, which are independent of the Company, waived the right to dividends paid during the year, and have agreed to waive the right to future dividends, in relation to the ordinary shares and American Depositary Receipts (ADR) held by the trust.

Under the Company’s ADR programme, the right to dividends in relation to the ordinary shares underlying the ADRs was waived during the year by the ADR Depositary, under an arrangement whereby the Company pays the monies to satisfy any dividends separately to the Depositary for distribution to ADR holders entitled to the dividend. This arrangement is expected to continue for future dividends.

Share price

National Grid ordinary shares are listed on the London Stock Exchange under the symbol NG and the ADSs are listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol NGG.

LOGO

Price history

The following table shows the highest and lowest intraday market prices for our ordinary shares and ADSs for the periods indicated:

   Ordinary share
(pence)
   ADS
($)
 
   

 

High

   

 

Low

   

 

High

   

 

Low 

 

 

 

2015/16

   998.20     806.40     72.53     63.75   

 

 

2014/15

   965.00     806.22     77.21     62.25   

2013/14

   849.50     711.00     70.07     55.16   

2012/13

   770.00     627.00     58.33     49.55   

2011/12

   660.50     545.50     52.18     45.80   

2015/16 Q4

   998.20     906.10     72.47     64.76   

Q3

   968.57     890.60     72.53     67.31   

Q2

   918.90     806.40     69.71     63.75   

Q1

   940.90     817.20     72.14     64.37   

2014/15 Q4

   954.00     842.60     72.41     62.25   

Q3

   965.00     853.78     75.08     67.01   

Q2

   916.00     835.76     77.21     70.37   

Q1

   897.92     806.22     75.09     67.62   

April 2016

   1,011.50     950.20     73.10     68.83   

March 2016

   998.20     932.00     72.47     66.56   

February 2016

   992.50     925.55     72.36     67.20   

January 2016

   985.80     906.10     70.86     64.76   

December 2015

   968.57     892.93     71.05     67.62   

 

 

Shareholder analysis

The following table includes a brief analysis of shareholder numbers and shareholdings as at 31 March 2016.

Size of

shareholding

  Number of
shareholders
   % of
shareholders
   

Number

of shares

   

% of 

shares 

 

 

 

1–50

   164,955     17.79     4,739,232     0.12   

51–100

   248,832     26.84     17,628,238     0.45   

101–500

   400,098     43.15     84,389,639     2.15   

501–1,000

   56,663     6.11     39,596,174     1.01   

1,001–10,000

   53,455     5.76     132,042,157     3.37   

10,001–50,000

   2,120     0.23     38,087,028     0.97   

50,001–100,000

   205     0.02     14,532,280     0.37   

100,001–500,000

   464     0.05     113,514,429     2.89   

500,001–1,000,000

   140     0.02     101,923,402     2.60   

1,000,001+

   314     0.03     3,377,585,507     86.07   

 

 

Total

   927,246     100.00     3,924,038,086     100.00   

 

 

Taxation

The discussion in this section provides information about certain US federal income tax and UK tax consequences for US Holders (defined below) of owning ADSs and ordinary shares. A US Holder is beneficial owner of ADSs or ordinary shares that:

is for US federal income tax purposes (i) an individual citizen or resident of the United States, (ii) a corporation created or organised under the laws of the United States, any State thereof, (iii) an estate the income of which is subject to US federal income tax without regard to its source or (iv) a trust if a court within the United States is able to exercise primary supervision over the administration of the trust and one or more US persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust, or the trust has elected to be treated as a domestic trust for US federal income tax purposes;
is not resident or ordinarily resident in the UK for UK tax purposes; and
does not hold ADSs or ordinary shares in connection with the conduct of a business or the performance of services in the UK or otherwise in connection with a branch, agency or permanent establishment in the UK.
 

 

190 NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16 177Additional Information


 

Additional Information

 

Shareholder informationcontinued

This discussion is not a comprehensive description of all the US federal income tax and UK tax considerations that may be relevant to any particular investor (including consequences under the US alternative minimum tax or net investment income tax) and does not address state, local, or other tax laws. National Grid has assumed that shareholders, including US Holders, are familiar with the tax rules applicable to investments in securities generally and with any special rules to which they may be subject. This discussion deals only with US Holders who hold ADSs or ordinary shares as capital assets. It does not address the tax treatment of investors who are subject to special rules, such as:

 

financial institutions;
insurance companies;
dealers in securities or currencies;
investors who elect mark-to-market treatment;
entities treated as partnerships or other pass-through entities and their partners;
individual retirement accounts and other tax-deferred accounts;
tax-exempt organisations;
investors who own (directly or indirectly) 10% or more of our voting stock;
investors who hold ADSs or ordinary shares as a position in a straddle, hedging transaction or conversion transaction;
persons that have ceased to be US citizens or lawful permanent residents of the US; and
investors whose functional currency is not the US dollar.

The statements regarding US and UK tax laws and administrative practices set forth below are based on laws, treaties, judicial decisions and regulatory interpretations in effect on the date of this document. These laws and practices are subject to change without notice, potentially with retroactive effect. In addition, the statements set forth below are based on the representations of the Depositary and assume that each party to the Deposit Agreement will perform its obligations thereunder in accordance with its terms.

US Holders of ADSs generally will be treated as the owners of the ordinary shares represented by those ADSs for US federal income tax purposes. For the purposes of the Tax Convention, the Estate Tax Convention and UK tax considerations, this discussion assumes that a US Holder of ADSs will be treated as the owner of the ordinary shares represented by those ADSs. HMRC has stated that it will continue to apply its long-standing practice of treating a holder of ADSs as holding the beneficial interest in the ordinary shares represented by the ADSs; however, we note that this is an area of some uncertainty and may be subject to change.

US Holders should consult their own advisors regarding the tax consequences of buying, owning and disposing of ADSs or ordinary shares in light of their particular circumstances, including the effect of any state, local, or other tax laws.

Taxation of dividends

The UK does not currently impose a withholding tax on dividends paid to US Holders.

Cash distributions paid out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits (as determined for US federal income tax purposes) generally will be taxable to a US Holder as dividend income. Distributions in excess of current and accumulated earnings and profits will be treated as a non-taxable return of capital to the extent of a US Holder’s basis in its ADSs or ordinary shares, as applicable, and thereafter as a capital gain. However, we do not maintain calculations of our earnings and profits in accordance with US federal income tax principles. US Holders should therefore assume that any distribution by us with respect to ADSs or ordinary shares will be reported as dividend income.

Dividends received by non-corporate US Holders with respect to ADSs or ordinary shares will generally be taxable at the reduced rate applicable to long-term capital gains provided (i) either (a) we are eligible for the benefits of the Tax Convention or (b) ADSs or ordinary shares are treated as ‘readily tradable’ on an established securities market in the United States and (ii) we are not, for our taxable year during which the dividend is paid or the prior year, a passive foreign investment company for US federal income tax purposes (a PFIC), and certain other requirements are met. We (1) expect that our shares will be treated as ‘readily tradable’ on an established securities market in the United States as a result of the trading of ADSs on the New York Stock Exchange and (2) believe we are eligible for the benefits of the Tax Convention.

Based on our audited financial statements and the nature of our business activities, we believe that we were not treated as a PFIC for US federal income tax purposes with respect to our taxable year ending 31 March 2016. In addition, based on our current expectations regarding the value and nature of our assets, the sources and nature of our income, and the nature of our business activities, we do not anticipate becoming a PFIC in the foreseeable future.

Dividends received by corporate US Holders with respect to ADSs or ordinary shares will not be eligible for the dividends received deduction generally allowed to corporations.

Taxation of capital gains

US Holders will not be subject to UK taxation on any capital gain realised on the sale or other disposition of ADSs or ordinary shares.

Provided that we are not a PFIC for any taxable year during which a US Holder holds their ADSs or ordinary shares, upon a sale or other disposition of ADSs or ordinary shares, a US Holder generally will recognise capital gain or loss equal to the difference between the US dollar value of the amount realised on the sale or other disposition and the US Holder’s adjusted tax basis in the ADSs or ordinary shares. Such capital gain or loss generally will be long-term capital gain or loss if the ADSs or ordinary shares were held for more than one year. For non-corporate US Holders, long-term capital gain is generally taxed at a lower rate than ordinary income. A US Holder’s ability to deduct capital losses is subject to significant limitations.

 

General meetings

AGMs must be convened each year within six months of the Company’s accounting reference date upon 21 clear days’ advance written notice. Any other general meeting may be convened provided at least 14 clear days’ written notice is given, subject to annual approval of shareholders. In certain limited circumstances, the Company can convene a general meeting by shorter notice. The notice must specify, among other things, the nature of the business to be transacted, the place, the date and the time of the meeting.

Rights of non residents

There are no restrictions under National Grid’s Articles that would limit the rights of persons not resident in the UK to vote in relation to ordinary shares.

Disclosure of interests

Under the Companies Act 2006, National Grid may, by written notice, require a person whom it has reasonable cause to believe to be or to have been in the last three years interested in its shares to provide additional information relating to that interest. Under the Articles, failure to provide such information may result in a shareholder losing their rights to attend, vote or exercise any other right in relation to shareholders’ meetings.

Under the UK Disclosure and Transparency Rules, there is also an obligation on a person who acquires or ceases to have a notifiable interest in shares in National Grid to notify the Company of that fact. The disclosure threshold is 3% and disclosure is required each time the person’s direct and indirect holdings reach, exceed or fall below each 1% threshold thereafter.

The UK City Code on Takeovers and Mergers imposes strict disclosure requirements with regard to dealings in the securities of an offeror or offeree company, and also on their respective associates, during the course of an offer period. Other regulators in the UK, US and elsewhere may have, or assert, notification or approval rights over acquisitions or transfers of shares.

Board biographies

Sir Peter Gershon CBE FREng, Chairman

Appointment to the Board: 1 August 2011 as Deputy Chairman, Chairman with effect from 1 January 2012

Committee membership: N (ch)

Previous appointments: Chairman of Premier Farnell plc, Chief Executive of the Office of Government Commerce, Managing Director of Marconi Electronic Systems and member of the UK Defence Academy Advisory Board.

External appointments: Chairman of Tate & Lyle plc and the Aircraft Carrier Alliance and member of The Sutton Trust Board.

Experience:

   Chairman

   City

   Engineer

   High tech industry

   Government

   US

   Partnering/JV/contract

   International

     management

   General management

 National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16 Shareholder information 
191


UK stamp duty and stamp duty reserve tax (SDRT)

Transfers of ordinary shares – SDRT at the rate of 0.5% of the amount or value of the consideration will generally be payable on any agreement to transfer ordinary shares that is not completed using a duly stamped instrument of transfer (such as a stock transfer form).

Where an instrument of transfer is executed and duly stamped before the expiry of the six year period beginning with the date on which the agreement is made, the SDRT liability will be cancelled. If a claim is made within the specified period, any SDRT which has been paid will be refunded. SDRT is due whether or not the agreement or transfer is made or carried out in the UK and whether or not any party to that agreement or transfer is a UK resident.

Purchases of ordinary shares completed using a stock transfer form will generally result in a UK stamp duty liability at the rate of

0.5% (rounded up to the nearest £5) of the amount or value of the consideration. Paperless transfers under the CREST paperless settlement system will generally be liable to SDRT at the rate of 0.5%, and not stamp duty. SDRT is generally the liability of the purchaser and UK stamp duty is usually paid by the purchaser or transferee.

Transfers of ADSs – No UK stamp duty will be payable on the acquisition or transfer of existing ADSs or beneficial ownership of ADSs, provided that any instrument of transfer or written agreement to transfer is executed outside the UK and remains at all times outside the UK.

An agreement for the transfer of ADSs in the form of ADRs will not result in a SDRT liability. A charge to stamp duty or SDRT may arise on the transfer of ordinary shares to the Depositary or The Bank of New York Mellon as agent of the Depositary (the Custodian).

The rate of stamp duty or SDRT will generally be 1.5% of the value of the consideration or, in some circumstances, the value of the ordinary shares concerned. However, there is no 1.5% SDRT charge on the issue of ordinary shares (or, where it is integral to the raising of new capital, the transfer of ordinary shares) to the Depositary or the Custodian.

The Depositary will generally be liable for the stamp duty or SDRT. Under the terms of the Deposit Agreement, the Depositary will charge any tax payable by the Depositary or the Custodian (or their nominees) on the deposit of ordinary shares to the party to whom the ADSs are delivered against such deposits. If the stamp duty is not a multiple of £5, the duty will be rounded up to the nearest multiple of £5.

US information reporting and backup withholding tax

Dividend payments made to US Holders and proceeds paid from the sale, exchange, redemption or disposal of ADSs or ordinary shares to US Holders may be subject to information reporting to the US Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Such payments may be subject to backup withholding taxes if the US Holder fails to provide an accurate taxpayer identification number or certification of exempt status or fails to comply with applicable certification requirements.

US Holders should consult their tax advisors about these rules and any other reporting obligations that may apply to the ownership or disposition of ADSs or ordinary shares, including reporting requirements related to the holding of certain foreign financial assets.

UK inheritance tax

An individual who is domiciled in the US for the purposes of the Estate Tax Convention and who is not a UK national for the purposes of the Estate Tax Convention will generally not be subject to UK inheritance tax in respect of (i) the ADSs or ordinary shares on the individual’s death or (ii) a gift of the ADSs or ordinary shares during the individual’s lifetime. This is not the case where the ADSs or ordinary shares are part of the business property of the individual’s permanent establishment in the UK or relate to a fixed base in the UK of an individual who performs independent personal services.

Special rules apply to ADSs or ordinary shares held in trust. In the exceptional case where the ADSs or shares are subject both to UK inheritance tax and to US federal gift or estate tax, the Estate Tax Convention generally provides for the tax paid in the UK to be credited against tax paid in the US.

Capital gains tax (CGT) for UK resident shareholders

You can find CGT information relating to National Grid shares for UK resident shareholders on our website under: Investors, Shareholder centre, More information and help. Share prices on specific dates are also available on our website.

 

192   

Steve Holliday FREng, Chief Executive

Appointment to the Board: October 2002, appointed to National Grid Group plc on 30 March 2001, Chief Executive with effect from January 2007

Committee membership: F

Previous appointments: Executive Director of British Borneo OilAnnual Report and Gas; he also spent 19 years within the Exxon Group, where he held senior positions in the international gas business and managed major operational areas such as refining and shipping. Most recently Chairman of UK Business Council for Sustainable Energy, the Prince’s National Ambassador and Non-executive Director of Marks and Spencer Group plc.

External appointments: Chairman of Crisis UK and of the En

ergy and Efficiency Industrial Partnership, and Vice Chairman for Business in the Community and of The Careers and Enterprise Company.

Experience:

Accounts 2015/16 

   Chief Executive

   Utilities – energy

   Engineer

   Customer

   Government/regulatory

   Oil and gas

   Partnering/JV/contract

   US

     management

   International

   City

Andrew Bonfield, Finance Director

Appointment to the Board: 1 November 2010

Committee membership: F, S

Previous appointments: Chief Financial Officer at Cadbury plc until March 2010; he also spent five years as Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer of Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and has previous experience in the energy sector as Finance Director of BG Group plc.

External appointments: Non-executive Director of Kingfisher plc.

Experience:

   Finance Director

   City

   Accountant

   Utilities – energy

   Government/regulatory

   Customer

   Partnering/JV/contract

   US

     management

   International

Nora Mead Brownell, Non-executive Director

Appointment to the Board: 1 June 2012

Committee membership: N, R, S

Previous appointments: Commissioner of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission from 1997 to 2001, Commissioner for the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission from 2001 to 2006 and former President of the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners. Board member of ONCOR Electric Delivery Holding Company LLC and Comverge, Inc.

External appointments:Board member of Spectra Energy Partners LP, Direct Energy Advisory Board and the Advisory Board of Morgan Stanley Infrastructure Partners and partner in ESPY Energy Solutions, LLC.

Experience:

   US Government/regulatory

   Various non-executive

   US utilities – energy

     directorships

   FERC

   US

       178Additional Information 


Jonathan Dawson, Non-executive Director

Appointment to the Board: 4 March 2013

Committee membership: F, N, R (ch)

Previous appointments: Various roles within the Ministry of Defence before joining Lazard where he spent over 20 years. Non-executive Director of Galliford Try plc 2004 to 2008, National Australia Group Europe Limited 2005 to 2012 and Standard Life Investments (Holdings) Limited 2010 to 2013, and most recently Senior Independent Director and Chairman of the Remuneration Committee of Next plc.
External appointments: Non-executive Director of Jardine Lloyd Thompson Group plc and Chairman of Penfida Limited.
Experience:
CityBanking
Corporate financePensions

Therese Esperdy, Non-executive Director

Appointment to the Board: 18 March 2014, and to the Board of National Grid USA with effect from 1 May 2015
Committee membership: A, F (ch), N
Previous appointments: Joined Chase Securities in 1997, having started her banking career with Lehman Brothers. Various senior roles at JPMorgan Chase & Co. including Head of US Debt Capital Markets and Global Head of Debt Capital Markets and most recently co head of Banking, Asia Pacific at JPMorgan.
External appointments: Global Chairman of the Financial Institutions Group, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Experience:
CityUS
Corporate financeInternational
Banking

Paul Golby CBE FREng, Non-executive Director

Appointment to the Board: 1 February 2012

Committee membership: A, N, R, S (ch)

Previous appointments: Executive Director of Clayhithe plc before joining East Midlands Electricity plc in 1998 as Managing Director, Chief Executive of E.ON UK plc in 2002, and later additionally as Chairman, stepping down from the E.ON board in December 2011 and most recently Non-executive Chairman of AEA Technology Group plc.
External appointments: Chairman of EngineeringUK and the UK National Air Traffic System, Chair of the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council and a member of the Council for Science and Technology and of the Nurse Review Advisory Group.
Experience:
Chairman and chief executiveCity
EngineerUtilities – energy
Government/regulatory

Ruth Kelly, Non-executive Director

Appointment to the Board: 1 October 2011

Committee membership: A, F, N

Previous appointments: Various senior roles in Government from 2001 to 2008, including Secretary of State for Transport, Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, Secretary of State for Education and Skills and Financial Secretary to the Treasury.

External appointments: Senior Executive at HSBC and Governor for the National Institute of Economic and Social Research.

Experience:
Government/regulatoryFinancial and economic

Partnering/JV/contract management

Infrastructure projects

John Pettigrew, Executive Director, UK

Appointment to the Board: 1 April 2014
Previous appointments: Joined The National Grid Company plc in 1991 and held various senior management roles, becoming Director of Engineering in 2003. He went on to become Chief Operating Officer and Executive Vice President for the US Electricity Distribution & Generation business between 2007 and 2010; Chief Operating Officer for UK Gas Distribution between 2010 and 2012; and UK Chief Operating Officer from 2012 to 2014.
Experience:
Government/regulatoryUtilities – energy
Partnering/JV/contract managementUS

Dean Seavers, Executive Director, US

Appointment to the Board: 1 April 2015
Previous appointments: Various senior management positions at Tyco International Ltd. from 2000 to 2007 before joining General Electric Company/United Technologies Corporation in 2007. President and Chief Executive Officer of General Electric Security from 2007 to 2010 and then President, Global Services of United Technologies Fire & Security from 2010 to 2011. Additionally, a member of the Board of Directors of National Fire Protection Association from 2010 to 2014, lead network member at City Light Capital from 2011 to 2015 and President and Chief Executive at Red Hawk Fire & Security, LLC from 2012 to 2014.
External appointments: Board member of Red Hawk Fire & Security, LLC.
Experience:
Chief executiveCustomer
Partnering/JV/contractUS
managementInternational
City

Change and performance

Corporate finance

improvement programmes

Financial servicesGeneral management

Mark Williamson, Non-executive Director

Appointment to the Board: 3 September 2012

Committee membership: A (ch), N, R

Previous appointments: Chief Accountant then Group Financial Controller of Simon Group plc before joining International Power plc as Group Financial Controller in 2000 and appointed as Chief Financial Officer in 2003.
External appointments: Non-executive, Chairman of the Audit Committee and Senior Independent Director of Alent plc, and Chairman of Imperial Tobacco Group PLC.
Experience:
Finance directorCity
AccountantUtilities – energy
Government/regulatoryInternational

Alison Kay, Group General Counsel & Company Secretary

Appointment as Company Secretary: 24 January 2013

Previous appointments: Various roles since joining National Grid in 1996 including UK General Counsel and Company Secretary from 2000 to 2008 and Commercial Director, UK Transmission from 2008 to 2012.

Key
A      Audit Committee
F      Finance Committee
N      Nominations Committee
R      Remuneration Committee
S      Safety, Environment and Health Committee
(ch)  Chairman of committee

LOGO

          NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15179


 

Additional Information

 

Shareholder informationcontinued

 

Other disclosures

  

Depositary payments to the Company

The Depositary reimburses the Company for certain expenses it incurs in relation to the ADS programme. The Depositary also pays the standard out-of-pocket maintenance costs for the ADSs, which consist of the expenses for the mailing of annual and interim financial reports, printing and distributing dividend cheques, electronic filing of US federal tax information, mailing required tax forms, stationery, postage, facsimile and telephone calls. It also reimburses the Company for certain investor relationship programmes or special investor relations promotional activities. There are limits on the amount of expenses for which the Depositary will reimburse the Company, but the amount of reimbursement is not necessarily tied to the amount of fees the Depositary collects from investors. For the period 1 April 2014 to 20 May 2015, the Company received a total of $2,094,871.42 in reimbursements from the Depositary consisting of $1,440,230.53 and $654,640.89 received in October 2014 and January 2015 respectively. Fees that are charged on cash dividends will be apportioned between the Depositary and the Company, see below.

 

Any questions from ADS holders should be directed to The Bank of New York Mellon at the contact details on page 196.

 

Description of securities other than equity securities: depositary fees and charges

The Bank of New York Mellon, as the Depositary, collects fees, by deducting those fees from the amounts distributed or by selling a portion of distributable property, for:

 

 delivery and surrender of ADSs directly from investors depositing shares or surrendering ADSs for the purpose of withdrawal or from intermediaries acting for them; and

 making distributions to investors (including, it is expected, cash dividends).

 

The Depositary may generally refuse to provide fee attracting services until its fees for those services are paid.

   

The Company’s Deposit Agreement under which the ADS are issued allows a fee of up to $0.05 per ADS to be charged for any cash distribution made to ADS holders, including cash dividends. ADS holders who receive cash in relation to the 2014/15 final dividend will be charged a fee of $0.02 per ADS by the Depositary prior to distribution of the cash dividend.

 

Documents on display

National Grid is subject to the filing requirements of the Exchange Act, as amended. In accordance with these requirements, we file reports and other information with the SEC. These materials, including this document, may be inspected during normal business hours at our registered office 1-3 Strand, London WC2N 5EH or at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. For further information about the Public Reference Room, please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Some of our filings are also available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

 

Events after the reporting period

There have been no material events affecting the Company since the year end.

 

Exchange controls

There are currently no UK laws, decrees or regulations that restrict the export or import of capital, including, but not limited to, foreign exchange control restrictions, or that affect the remittance of dividends, interest or other payments to non UK resident holders of ordinary shares except as otherwise set out in Taxation on page 182 and except in respect of the governments of and/or certain citizens, residents or bodies of certain countries (described in applicable Bank of England Notices or European Union Council Regulations in force as at the date of this document).

 

Exchange rates

The following table shows the history of the exchange rates of one pound sterling to dollars for the periods indicated.

  Persons depositing or    
  withdrawing shares must pay: For    
  

$5.00 per 100 ADSs

(or portion of 100 ADSs)

 Issuance of ADSs, including issuances resulting from a distribution of shares or rights or other property; cancellation of ADSs for the purpose of withdrawal, including if the Deposit Agreement terminates; distribution of securities distributed to holders of deposited securities that are distributed by the Depositary to ADS registered holders.    Dollar equivalent of £1 sterling 
       High Low 
      

 

 

April 2015

March 2015

February 2015

January 2015

December 2014

1.5454

1.5372

1.5488

1.5388

1.5729

1.4642 

1.4686 

1.5035 

1.5018 

1.5522 

      

 

 Average1
      

 

 

2014/15

2013/14

2012/13

1.61 

1.60 

1.57 

 Registration or transfer feesTransfer and registration of shares on our share register to or from the name of the Depositary or its agent when they deposit or withdraw shares.

2011/12

2010/11

1.60 

1.57 

      

 

 

 

1.  The average for each period is calculated by using the average of the exchange rates on the last day of each month during the period. See weighted average exchange rate on page 87.

 Expenses of the DepositaryCable, telex and facsimile transmissions (when expressly provided in the Deposit Agreement); converting foreign currency to dollars.

 

Material interests in shares

As at 31 March 2015, National Grid had been notified of the following holdings in voting rights of 3% or more in the issued share capital of the Company:

 Taxes and other governmental charges the Depositary or the Custodian has to pay on any ADS or share underlying an ADS, for example, stock transfer taxes, stamp duty or withholding taxesAs necessary.
 

 

Number of ordinary shares

% of voting 

rights1

      

 

 

The Capital Group Companies, Inc.

Black Rock, Inc.

Competrol International

187,283,805

182,630,798

    

4.98 

5.21 

    

    

Investments Limited

149,414,2853.99 
       

 

 

 

1.  This number is calculated in relation to the issued share capital at the time the holding was disclosed.

     180


 

 

   

On 20 April 2015, The Capital Group of Companies, Inc. notified us of a holding in voting rights of 3.881%, 145,094,617 ordinary shares, as at 16 April 2015.

 

As at 20 May 2015, no further notifications have been received.

 

The rights attached to ordinary shares are detailed on page 177. All ordinary shares carry the same voting rights.

 

Share capital

The share capital of the Company consists of ordinary shares of 11 1743 pence nominal value each and ADSs, which represent five ordinary shares each.

 

Authority to purchase shares

Shareholder approval was given at the 2014 AGM to purchase up to 10% of the Company’s share capital (being 373,477,508 ordinary shares). The Directors intend to seek shareholder approval to renew this authority at this year’s AGM.

 

In some circumstances, the Company may find it advantageous to have the authority to purchase its own shares in the market, where the Directors believe this would be in the interests of shareholders generally. The Directors believe that it is an important part of the financial management of the Company to have the flexibility to repurchase issued shares in order to manage its capital base, including actively managing share issuances from the operation of the scrip dividend scheme. It is expected that such repurchases will not exceed 2.5% of the issued share capital (excluding treasury shares) per annum.

 

When purchasing shares, the Company have and will, take into account market conditions prevailing at the time, other investment and financing opportunities and the overall financial position of the Company.

 

During the year the Company purchased ordinary shares in the capital of the Company as part of the management of the dilutive effect of share issuances under the scrip dividend scheme.

    

Authority to allot shares

Shareholder approval was given at the 2014 AGM to allot shares of up to one third of the Company’s share capital. The Directors are seeking this same lower level of authority this year. The Directors consider that the Company will have sufficient flexibility with the lower level of authority to respond to market developments. This authority is in line with investor guidelines.

 

The Directors currently have no intention of issuing new shares, or of granting rights to subscribe for or convert any security into shares, except in relation to, or in connection with, the operation and management of the Company’s scrip dividend scheme and the exercise of options under the Company’s share plans. No issue of shares will be made which would effectively alter control of the Company without the sanction of shareholders in general meeting.

 

The Company expects to actively manage the dilutive effect of share issuance arising from the operation of the scrip dividend scheme. In some circumstances, additional shares may be allotted to the market for this purpose under the authority provided by this resolution. Under these unlikely circumstances, it is expected that the associated allotment of new shares (or rights to subscribe for or convert any security into shares) will not exceed 1% of the issued share capital (excluding treasury shares) per year.

 

Dividend waivers

The trustees of the National Grid Employees Share Trust, which are independent of the Company, waived the right to dividends paid during the year, and have agreed to waive the right to future dividends, in relation to the ordinary shares and American Depositary Receipts (ADR) held by the trust.

 

Under the Company’s ADR programme, the right to dividends in relation to the ordinary shares underlying the ADRs was waived during the year by the ADR Depositary, under an arrangement whereby the Company pays the monies to satisfy any dividends separately to the Depositary for distribution to ADR holders entitled to the dividend. This arrangement is expected to continue for future dividends.

 

Share price

LOGO

 

National Grid ordinary shares are listed on the London Stock Exchange under the symbol NG and the ADSs are listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol NGG.

   Number of shares 

Total

nominal

value

 

  Percentage 

of called 

up share 

capital1

    
  

 

    

Shares held in Treasury purchased in prior years

  123,948,354    £14,124,347.323.18%  

 

Shares purchased and held in Treasury during the year2,3

37,350,216£4,256,187.400.96%  

 

Shares transferred from Treasury during the year (to employees under employee share plans)2

8,353,093£951,864.090.21%  

 

Maximum number of shares held in Treasury during the year2

152,970,767£17,431,552.523.93%  
  

 

    

 

1.  Called up share capital of 3,891,691,900 ordinary shares as at the date of this

     Report.

2.  From 7 August 2014 to 31 March 2015.

3.  Shares purchased for a total cost of £338,170,931.

 

As at the date of this Report, the Company held 150,305,846 ordinary shares as treasury shares, representing 3.86% of the Company’s called up share capital.

 

 

LOGO

     NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15All-employee share plans181


Additional Information

Shareholder informationcontinued

  

Price history

The following table shows the highest and lowest intraday market prices for our ordinary shares and ADSs for the periods indicated:

 

    

This discussion is not a comprehensive description of all the US federal income tax and UK tax considerations that may be relevant to any particular investor (including consequences under the US alternative minimum tax or net investment income tax) and does not address state, local, or other tax laws. National Grid has assumed that shareholders, including US Holders, are familiar with the tax rules applicable to investments in securities generally and with any special rules to which they may be subject. This discussion deals only with US Holders who hold ADSs or ordinary shares as capital assets. It does not address the tax treatment of investors who are subject to special rules, such as:

 

 financial institutions;

 insurance companies;

 dealers in securities or currencies;

 investors who elect mark-to-market treatment;

 partnerships or other pass-through entities and their partners;

 individual retirement accounts and other tax-deferred accounts;

 tax-exempt organisations;

 investors who own (directly or indirectly) 10% or more of our voting stock;

 investors who hold ADSs or ordinary shares as a position in a straddle, hedging transaction or conversion transaction; and

 investors whose functional currency is not the US dollar.

 

The statements regarding US and UK tax laws and administrative practices set forth below are based on laws, treaties, judicial decisions and regulatory interpretations in effect on the date of this document. These laws and practices are subject to change without notice, potentially with retroactive effect. In addition, the statements set forth below are based on the representations of the Depositary and assume that each party to the Deposit Agreement will perform its obligations thereunder in accordance with its terms.

 

US Holders of ADSs will be treated as the owners of the ordinary shares represented by those ADSs for US federal income tax purposes. For the purposes of the Tax Convention, the Estate Tax Convention and UK tax considerations, this discussion assumes that a US Holder of ADSs will be treated as the owner of the ordinary shares represented by those ADSs. HMRC has stated that it will continue to apply its long-standing practice of treating a holder of ADSs as holding the beneficial interest in the ordinary shares represented by the ADSs; however, we note that this is an area of some uncertainty and may be subject to change.

 

US Holders should consult their own advisors regarding the tax consequences of buying, owning and disposing of ADSs or ordinary shares in light of their particular circumstances, including the effect of any state, local, or other tax laws.

 

Taxation of dividends

The UK does not currently impose a withholding tax on dividends paid to US Holders.

 

Cash distributions paid out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits (as determined for US federal income tax purposes) generally will be taxable to a US Holder as dividend income. Distributions in excess of current and accumulated earnings and profits will be treated as a non-taxable return of capital to the extent of a US Holder’s basis in its ADSs or ordinary shares, as applicable, and thereafter as a capital gain. However, we do not maintain calculations of our earnings and profits in accordance with US federal income tax principles. US Holders should therefore assume that any distribution by us with respect to ADSs or ordinary shares will be reported as dividend income.

            

 Ordinary share (pence) 

 

ADS ($)

   
      High Low  High   Low    
  

 

   
2014/15965.00806.22 77.21  62.25 
2013/14849.50711.00 70.07  55.16 
2012/13770.00627.00 58.33  49.55 
2011/12660.50545.50 52.18  45.80 
2010/111666.00474.80 51.00  36.72  
2014/15 Q4954.00842.60 72.41  62.25  
Q3965.00853.78 75.08  67.01  
Q2916.00835.76 77.21  70.37  
Q1897.92806.22 75.09  67.62  
2013/14 Q4842.50769.00 70.07  63.19  
Q3797.50725.16 65.39  58.85  
Q2817.75727.45 61.59  55.30  
Q1849.50711.00 64.56  55.16  
April 2015910.90863.60 68.88  64.65  
March 2015897.80842.60 68.22  62.25  
February 2015942.10868.20 71.13  67.12  
January 2015954.00890.89 72.41  67.87  
December 2014936.90860.03 73.54  67.01  
  

 

    

 

1.  On 20 May 2010, we announced a 2 for 5 rights issue of 990,439,017 ordinary shares at 355 pence per share.

 
 

 

Shareholder analysis

The following table includes a brief analysis of shareholder numbers and shareholdings as at 31 March 2015.

 

 

Number of

shareholders

% of

shareholders

Number

of shares

% of 

shares 

Size of shareholding
  

 

   
1–50170,30017.72754,916,5300.1263 
51–100259,88827.053218,391,9040.4726 
101–500415,12843.213187,234,2452.2416 
501–1,00057,9306.030340,551,7451.0420 
1,001–10,00054,2525.6474133,804,2483.4382 
10,001–50,0002,0740.215937,223,8480.9565 
50,001–100,0001960.020414,049,2180.3610 
100,001–500,0004440.0462107,102,5982.7521 
500,001–1,000,0001330.013894,059,6252.4169 
1,000,001+3090.03223,354,357,939 86.1928 
  

 

   
Total960,6541003,891,691,900100 
  

 

   

 

 

Taxation

The discussion in this section provides information about certain US federal income tax and UK tax consequences for US Holders (defined below) of owning ADSs and ordinary shares. A US Holder is beneficial owner of ADSs or ordinary shares that:

 

 is (i) an individual citizen or resident of the United States, (ii) a corporation created or organised under the laws of the United States, any State thereof or the District of Columbia, (iii) an estate the income of which is subject to US federal income tax without regard to its source or (iv) a trust if a court within the United States is able to exercise primary supervision over the administration of the trust and one or more US persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust, or the trust has elected to be treated as a domestic trust for US federal income tax purposes;

 is not resident or ordinarily resident in the UK for UK tax purposes; and

 does not hold ADSs or ordinary shares in connection with the conduct of a business or the performance of services in the UK or otherwise in connection with a branch, agency or permanent establishment in the UK.

     182


Dividends received by non-corporate US Holders with respect to ADSsThe Company has a number of all-employee share plans as described below, which operated during the year. These allow UK- or US-based employees to participate in either HMRC (UK) or ordinary shares will generally be taxable at the reduced rate applicable to long-term capital gains provided (i) either (a) we are eligible for the benefits of the Tax Convention or (b) ADSs or ordinary shares are treated as ‘readily tradable’ on an established securities market in the United States and (ii) we are not, for our taxable year during which the dividend is paid or the prior year, a passive foreign investment company for US federal income tax purposes (a PFIC), and certain other requirements are met. We (1) expect that our shares will be treated as ‘readily tradable’ on an established securities market in the United States as a result of the trading of ADSs on the New York Stock Exchange and (2) believe we are eligible for the benefits of the Tax Convention. Based on our audited financial statements and the nature of our business activities, we believe that we were not treated as a PFIC for US federal income tax purposes with respect to our taxable year ending 31 March 2015. In addition, based on our current expectations regarding the value and nature of our assets, the sources and nature of our income, and the nature of our business activities, we do not anticipate becoming a PFIC in the foreseeable future.

Dividends received by corporate US Holders with respect to ADSs or ordinary shares will not be eligible for the dividends received deduction generally allowed to corporations.

Taxation of capital gains

US Holders will not be subject to UK taxation on any capital gain realised on the sale or other disposition of ADSs or ordinary shares.

Provided that we are not a PFIC for any taxable year during which a US Holder holds their ADSs or ordinary shares, upon a sale or other disposition of ADSs or ordinary shares, a US Holder generally will recognise capital gain or loss equal to the difference between the US dollar value of the amount realised on the sale or other disposition and the US Holder’s adjusted tax basis in the ADSs or ordinary shares. Such capital gain or loss generally will be long-term capital gain or loss if the ADSs or ordinary shares were held for more than one year. For non-corporate US Holders, long-term capital gain is generally taxed at a lower rate than ordinary income. A US Holder’s ability to deduct capital losses is subject to significant limitations.

UK stamp duty and stamp duty reserve tax (SDRT)

Transfers of ordinary shares – SDRT at the rate of 0.5% of the amount or value of the consideration will generally be payable on any agreement to transfer ordinary shares that is not completed using a duly stamped instrument of transfer (such as a stock transfer form).

Where an instrument of transfer is executed and duly stamped before the expiry of the six year period beginning with the date on which the agreement is made, the SDRT liability will be cancelled. If a claim is made within the specified period, any SDRT which has been paid will be refunded. SDRT is due whether or not the agreement or transfer is made or carried out in the UK and whether or not any party to that agreement or transfer is a UK resident.

Purchases of ordinary shares completed using a stock transfer form will generally result in a UK stamp duty liability at the rate of 0.5% (rounded up to the nearest £5) of the amount or value of the consideration. Paperless transfers under the CREST paperless settlement system will generally be liable to SDRT at the rate of 0.5%, and not stamp duty. SDRT is generally the liability of the purchaser and UK stamp duty is usually paid by the purchaser or transferee.

Transfers of ADSs – No UK stamp duty will be payable on the acquisition or transfer of existing ADSs or beneficial ownership of ADSs, provided that any instrument of transfer or written agreement to transfer is executed outside the UK and remains at all times outside the UK.

An agreement for the transfer of ADSs in the form of ADRs will not result in a SDRT liability. A charge to stamp duty or SDRT may arise on the transfer of ordinary shares to the Depositary or The Bank of New York Mellon as agent of the Depositary (the Custodian).

The rate of stamp duty or SDRT will generally be 1.5% of the value of the consideration or, in some circumstances, the value of the ordinary shares concerned. However, there is no 1.5% SDRT charge on the issue of ordinary shares (or, where it is integral to the raising of new capital, the transfer of ordinary shares) to the Depositary or the Custodian.

The Depositary will generally be liable for the stamp duty or SDRT. Under the terms of the Deposit Agreement, the Depositary will charge any tax payable by the Depositary or the Custodian (or their nominees) on the deposit of ordinary shares to the party to whom the ADSs are delivered against such deposits. If the stamp duty is not a multiple of £5, the duty will be rounded up to the nearest multiple of £5.

US information reporting and backup withholding tax

Dividend payments made to US Holders and proceeds paid from the sale, exchange, redemption or disposal of ADSs or ordinary shares to US Holders may be subject to information reporting to the US Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Such payments may be subject to backup withholding taxes unless the holder (i) is a corporation or other exempt recipient or (ii) provides a taxpayer identification number on a properly completed IRS Form W-9 and complies with applicable certification requirements.

US Holders should consult their tax advisors about these rules and any other reporting obligations that may apply to the ownership or disposition of ADSs or ordinary shares, including reporting requirements related to the holding of certain foreign financial assets.

UK inheritance tax

An individual who is domiciled in the US for the purposes of the Estate Tax Convention and who is not a UK national for the purposes of the Estate Tax Convention will generally not be subject to UK inheritance tax in respect of (i) the ADSs or ordinary shares on the individual’s death or (ii) a gift of the ADSs or ordinary shares during the individual’s lifetime. This is not the case where the ADSs or ordinary shares are part of the business property of the individual’s permanent establishment in the UK or relate to a fixed base in the UK of an individual who performs independent personal services.

Special rules apply to ADSs or ordinary shares held in trust. In the exceptional case where the ADSs or shares are subject both to UK inheritance tax and to US federal gift or estate tax, the Estate Tax Convention generally provides for the tax paid in the UK to be credited against tax paid in the US.

Capital gains tax (CGT) for UK resident shareholders

You can find CGT information relating to National Grid shares for UK resident shareholders on our website under: Investors, Shareholder centre, More information and help. Share prices on specific dates are also available on our website.

LOGO

      NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15183


Additional Information

Other disclosures

All-employee share plans

The all-employee share plans allow UK- or US-based employees to participate in either HMRC (UK) or Internal Revenue Service (US) approved plans and to become shareholders in National Grid.

Sharesave

Employees resident in the UK are eligible to participate in the Sharesave plan. Under this plan, participants may contribute between £5 and £500 in total each month, for a fixed period of three years, five years or both. Contributions are taken from net salary.

SIP

Employees resident in the UK are eligible to participate in the SIP. Contributions up to £150 are deducted from participants’ gross salary and used to purchase ordinary shares in National Grid each month. The shares are placed in trust.

US Incentive Thrift Plans

Employees of National Grid’s US companies are eligible to participate in the Thrift Plans, which are tax-advantaged savings plans (commonly referred to as 401(k) plans). They are DC pension plans that give participants the opportunity to invest up to applicable federal salary limits. The federal limits for calendar year 20142015 are: for pre-tax contributions, a maximum of 50% of salary limited to $17,500$18,000 for those under the age of 50 and $23,000$24,000 for those age 50 and above; for post-tax contributions, up to 15% of salary. The total amount of employee contributions (pre-tax and post-tax) may not exceed 50% of compensation, and are further subject to the combined federal annual contribution limit of $52,000.$53,000. For calendar year 2015,2016, participants may invest up to the applicable federal salary limits: for pre-tax contributions, a maximum of 50% of salary limited to $18,000 for those under the age of 50 and $24,000 for those age 50 and above; for post-tax contributions, up to 15% of salary. The total amount of employee contributions (pre-tax and post-tax) may not exceed 50% of compensation, and are further subject to the combined federal annual contribution limit of $53,000.

ESPP

Employees of National Grid’s US companies are eligible to participate in the ESPP (commonly referred to as a 423(b) plan). Eligible employees have the opportunity to purchase ADSs on a monthly basis at a 15% discounted price. Under the plan, employees may contribute up to 20% of base pay each year, up to a maximum annual contribution of $18,888 to purchase ADSs in National Grid.

Change of control provisions

No compensation would be paid for loss of office of Directors on a change of control of the Company. As at 31 March 2015,2016, the Company had undrawn borrowing facilities of £1.7 billion available to it with a number of its banks, of £1.4 billion available to it and a further £630 million£1.4 billion of drawn bank loans which, on a change of control of the Company following a takeover bid, may alter or terminate. All the Company’s share plans contain provisions relating to a change of control. Outstanding awards and options would normally vest and become exercisable on a change of control, subject to the satisfaction of any performance conditions at that time. In the event of a change of control of the Company, a number of governmental and regulatory consents or approvals are likely to be required, arising from laws or regulations of the UK, US or the EU. Such consents or approvals may also be required for acquisitions of equity securities that do not amount to a change of control.

No other agreements that take effect, alter or terminate upon a change of control of the Company following a takeover bid are considered to be significant in terms of their potential impact on the business as a whole.

Code of Ethics

In accordance with US legal requirements, the Board has adopted a Code of Ethics for senior financial professionals. This code is available on our website (where any amendments or waivers will also be posted). under: About us, Corporate governance, Code of Ethics. There were no amendments to, or waivers of, our Code of Ethics during the year.

Conflicts of interest

In accordance with the Companies Act 2006, the Board has a policy and procedure in place for the disclosure and authorisation (if appropriate) of actual and potential conflicts of interest. The Board continues to monitor and note possible conflicts of interest that each Director may have. The Directors are regularly reminded of their continuing obligations in relation to conflicts, and are required annually to review and confirm their external interests. Potential conflicts are considered and, if appropriate, authorised. During the year ended 31 March 2015, the Board has been advised by the Directors of two2016, no actual conflicts of interest were identified, which required approval by the Board. However, the Board was advised of two situations in relation to which potential conflicts of interest could arise, and has authorised thesethose potential conflicts in accordance with its powers as set out in the Articles. The Board has also considered and noted a number of situations in relation to which no actual conflict of interest was identified.

Corporate governance practices: differences from

New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) listing standards

The Company is listed on the NYSE and is therefore required to disclose differences in its corporate governance practices adopted as a UK listed company, compared with those of a US company.

The corporate governance practices of the Company are primarily based on the requirements of the UK Corporate Governance Code (the Code) but substantially conform to those required of US companies listed on the NYSE. The following is a summary of the significant ways in which the Company’s corporate governance practices differ from those followed by US companies under Section 303A Corporate Governance Standards of the NYSE.

 

•  The NYSE rules and the Code apply different tests for the independence of Board members.

•  The NYSE rules require a separate nominating/corporate governance committee composed entirely of independent Directors. There is no requirement for a separate corporate governance committee in the UK. Under the Company’s corporate governance policies, all Directors on the Board discuss and decide upon governance issues and the Nominations Committee makes recommendations to the Board with regard to certain of the responsibilities of a corporate governance committee.

•  The NYSE rules require listed companies to adopt and disclose corporate governance guidelines. While the Company reports compliance with the Code in each Annual Report and Accounts, the UK requirements do not require the Company to adopt and disclose separate corporate governance guidelines.

•  The NYSE rules require a separate audit committee    composed of at least three independent members. While the Company’s Audit Committee exceeds the NYSE’s minimum independent Non-executive Director membership requirements, it should be noted that the quorum for a meeting of the Audit Committee, of two independent Non-executive Directors, is less than the minimum membership requirements under the NYSE rules.

•  
The NYSE rules and the Code apply different tests for the independence of Board members.
The NYSE rules require a separate nominating/corporate governance committee composed entirely of independent Directors. There is no requirement for a separate corporate governance committee in the UK. Under the Company’s corporate governance policies, all Directors on the Board discuss and decide upon governance issues, and the Nominations Committee makes recommendations to the Board with regard to certain of the responsibilities of a corporate governance committee.
The NYSE rules require listed companies to adopt and disclose corporate governance guidelines. While the Company reports compliance with the Code in each Annual Report and Accounts, the UK requirements do not require the Company to adopt and disclose separate corporate governance guidelines.
The NYSE rules require a separate audit committee composed of at least three independent members. While the Company’s Audit Committee exceeds the NYSE’s minimum independent Non-executive Director membership requirements, it should be noted that the quorum for a meeting of the Audit Committee, of two independent Non-executive Directors, is less than the minimum membership requirements under the NYSE rules.
The NYSE rules require a compensation committee composed entirely of independent Directors, and prescribe criteria to evaluate the independence of the committee’s members and its ability to engage external compensation advisors. While the Code prescribes different independence criteria, the Non-executive Directors on the Remuneration Committee have each been deemed independent by the Board under the NYSE rules. Although the evaluation criteria for appointment of external advisors differ under the Code, the Remuneration Committee is solely responsible for appointment, retention and termination of such advisors.

 

 

               184


National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Other disclosures193


Other disclosurescontinued

Directors’ indemnity

The Company has arranged, in accordance with the Companies Act 2006 and the Articles, qualifying third-party indemnities against financial exposure that Directors may incur in the course of their professional duties. Equivalent qualifying third-party indemnities were, and remain, in force for the benefit of those Directors who stood down from the Board duringin prior financial years for matters arising when they were Directors of the year ended 31 March 2015.Company. Alongside these indemnities, the Company places Directors’ and Officers’ liability insurance cover for each Director.

Employees

We negotiate with recognised unions. It is our policy to maintain well developed communications and consultation programmes and there have been no material disruptions to our operations from labour disputes during the past five years. National Grid believes that it can conduct its relationships with trade unions and employees in a satisfactory manner.

Human Rights

Respect for human rights is incorporated into our employment practices and our values, which include respecting others and valuing diversity. ‘Always Doing the Right Thing’ is our guide to ethical business conduct – the way in which we conduct ourselves allows us to build trust with the people we work with. We earn this trust by doing things in the right way, building our reputation as an ethical company that our stakeholders want to do business with, and that our employees want to work for. Although we do not have a specific policypolicies relating to human rights, slavery and human trafficking, our procurement policies integrate sustainability into the way we do business throughout our supply chain, so that we create value, preserve natural resources and respect the interests of the communities we serve and from which we procure goods and services. Through our Global Supplier Code of Conduct (GSCoC), we expect our suppliers to keep to all laws relating to their business, as well as adhere to the principles of the United Nations Global Compact, the United Nations Declaration of Human RightsEthical Trading Initiative Base Code and the International Labour Organization.

UK Modern Slavery Act 2015. In 2015 the GSCoC was further updated to include the requirements of the Living Wage Foundation. To read more on the Company’s commitment to the Living Wage please see page 45.

Listing Rule 9.8.4 R cross reference table

Information required to be disclosed by LR 9.8.4 R (starting on page indicated):

 

member of National Grid has any obligation or entitlement which is material to National Grid at the date of this Report.

Political donations and expenditure

National Grid made no donations in the UK or EU during the year, including donations as defined for the purposes of the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000. National Grid USA and its affiliated New York and federal political action committees (each, a PAC) made political donations in the US totalling $54,375 (£34,415) during the year. National Grid USA’s affiliated New York PAC was funded partly by contributions from National Grid USA and certain of its subsidiaries and partly by voluntary employee contributions. National Grid USA’s affiliated federal PAC was funded wholly by voluntary employee contributions.

Property, plant and equipment

This information can be found under the heading note 11 property, plant and equipment on page 115, note 19 Borrowings on pages 123 and 124, Strategic Report pages 08 to 11, where we operate on page 165 and principal operations on pages 27 to 36.

Research and development

Expenditure on research and development during the year was £23 million (2013/14: £12 million; 2012/13: £15 million). Innovation funding throughout 2014/15 has stimulated greater investment across all three of our UK Regulated business areas: UK ET, UK GT and UK GD. Delivering benefits for our stakeholders has been at the forefront of each of our Innovation Projects. This has driven collaboration across the industry in search of new techniques to revolutionise the way we work. Due to the way in which we work with a large number of partners on new ideas, our disclosed research and development expenditure is lower than the overall contribution we make to the industry. We only disclose directly incurred expenditure, and not those amounts our partners incur working on projects with us.

The UK ET innovation portfolio has developed to reflect the evolution of our strategic innovation priorities. Our activities in the year have focused on enhancing our capabilities in managing ageing assets, improving the efficiency of new build, and system reliability and availability. In addition NGET secured £6.9 million of funding to develop new approaches to frequency control. The UK GT innovation portfolio has developed and expanded over the past year to include projects on 3D modelling, virtual reality technologies and sustainable energy solutions. In addition, GT won £5.7 million of funding for industry leading work in robotics for Project GRAID (Gas Robotic Agile Inspection Device). Innovation in UK GD has focused on reduction of leakage levels and minimisation of street works and excavations through the use of robotics. Our customers have been central to our portfolio, with projects enhancing safety through the use of Intelligent Carbon Monoxide monitoring and more robust on-site fencing feet and projects improving real-time information for work on-site through the use of QR codes.

The US business has been working on research and development initiatives to improve the way we deliver gas operations, and on modernising the US electricity grid in Massachusetts and Reforming the Energy Vision (REV) in New York State. More information in relation to grid modernisation and REV can be found on page 170.

Unresolved SEC staff comments

There are no unresolved staff comments required to be reported.

Interest capitalisedPage 112
Publication of unaudited financial informationNot applicable
Details of long-term incentive schemesNot applicable
Waiver of emoluments by a directorNot applicable
Waiver of future emoluments by a directorNot applicable
Non pre-emptive issues of equity for cashNot applicable
Item (7) in relation to major subsidiary undertakingsNot applicable
Parent participation in a placing by a listed subsidiaryNot applicable
Contracts of significanceNot applicable
Provision of services by a controlling shareholderNot applicable
Shareholder waivers of dividendsPage 190
Shareholder waivers of future dividendsPage 190
Agreements with controlling shareholdersNot applicable
Interest capitalisedPage 105
Publication of unaudited financial informationNot applicable
Details of long-term incentive schemesNot applicable
Waiver of emoluments by a directorNot applicable
Waiver of future emoluments by a directorNot applicable
Non pre-emptive issues of equity for cashNot applicable
Item (7) in relation to major subsidiary undertakingsNot applicable
Parent participation in a placing by a listed subsidiaryNot applicable
Contracts of significanceNot applicable
Provision of services by a controlling shareholderNot applicable
Shareholder waivers of dividendsPage 181
Shareholder waivers of future dividendsPage 181
Agreements with controlling shareholdersNot applicable

Material contracts

Each of our Executive Directors has a service agreement and each Non-executive Director has a letter of appointment. No contract (other than contracts entered into in the ordinary course of business) has been entered into by National Grid within the two years immediately preceding the date of this Report which is, or may be, material; or which contains any provision under which any member of National Grid has any obligation or entitlement which is material to National Grid at the date of this Report.

Political donations and expenditure

At this year’s AGM the Directors will seek authority from shareholders, on a precautionary basis, for the Company and its subsidiaries to make donations to registered political parties and other political organisations and/or incur political expenditure in the European Union (EU), in each case in amounts not exceeding £125,000 in aggregate. The definitions of these terms in the Companies Act 2006 are very wide and as a result this can cover bodies such as those concerned with policy review, law reform and the representation of the business community. It could include special interest groups, such as those involved with the environment, which the Company and its subsidiaries might wish to support, even though these activities are not designed to support or influence support for a particular party. The Company has no intention of changing its current practice of not making political donations or incurring political expenditure within the ordinary meaning of those words. This authority is therefore being sought to ensure that none of the Company’s activities inadvertently infringe these rules.

National Grid made no donations in the EU during the year, including donations as defined for the purposes of the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000. National Grid USA and its affiliated New York and federal political action committees (each, a PAC) made political donations in the US totalling $67,550 (£45,952) during the year. National Grid USA’s affiliated New York PAC was funded partly by contributions from National Grid USA and certain of its subsidiaries and partly by voluntary employee contributions. National Grid USA’s affiliated federal PAC was funded wholly by voluntary employee contributions.

Property, plant and equipment

This information can be found under the heading note 11 property, plant and equipment on pages 122 and 123, note 19 Borrowings on pages 130 and 131, Strategic Report pages 10 to 13, where we operate on page 175 and principal operations on pages 31 to 43.

Research and development

Expenditure on research and development during the year was £29 million (2014/15: £23 million; 2013/14: £12 million). Innovation funding throughout 2015/16 has sustained investment across all three of our UK Regulated business areas: UK ET, UK GT and UK GD. Through collaboration across the industry, we have continued our drive to deliver benefits for our stakeholders, challenging the way we work and seeking new technologies to deliver these benefits. Due to the way in which we work with a large number of partners on new ideas, our disclosed research and development expenditure is lower than the overall contribution we make to the industry. We only disclose directly incurred expenditure, and not those amounts our partners incur working on projects with us.

The UK ET innovation investment continues to aim to advance our strategic ambitions to reduce the cost of providing a secure, reliable and sustainable electricity transmission system. We have installed a 400kV transformer with synthetic ester, an insulating fluid that presents a significantly lower fire risk than the mineral oil normally used; and we’ve started work towards live trials of a new insulating gas that could be an effective alternative to SF6.

LOGO
 

 

194National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Additional Information


        NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15185                                 


Additional Information

Other unaudited financial information

 

   Additional Information

Research has also progressed on understanding of and ability to predict and manage the impact of increased levels of distributed and renewable generation on the system. UK ET has also secured £12 million of Network Innovation Competition funding support for our £14 million investment in an innovation facility in northeast Wales.

The UK GT innovation portfolio has continued to grow, with a key focus on safety and risk reduction through projects exploring new techniques to conduct internal pipe inspection and improve asset integrity, alongside those to provide enhanced gas forecasting and the development of new smart asset maintenance techniques. In addition, UK GT won £4.8 million funding for Project ‘CLoCC’ (customer low-cost connections), which seeks to minimise the time and cost of connections to the national gas transmission system.

Innovation in UK GD continues to grow with a diversified portfolio focusing on six value areas which reflect both the RIIO outputs and the UK GD ambition. We continue to develop and refine robotic and pipe-lining technologies to reduce the impact of our pipe replacement activities on our customers and the environment. Our focus has shifted towards implementing the output of these innovations into the business and demonstrating the value of our innovation projects to our customers.

Research, Development & Demonstration (RD&D) work in the US has focused on the advancement of products, processes, systems and work methods that may be new to National Grid. This is accomplished by working with internal departments to identify where strategic RD&D investment is needed and is likely to prove beneficial to National Grid. To achieve these goals, we work in collaboration with technical organisations, academia and vendors in the energy sector that align with our goals and objectives. This collaboration has also helped inform our strategic direction in response to jurisdictional requests for modernisation (Grid Modernization in Massachusetts and ‘Reforming the Energy Vision’ in New York).

In the year, we invested and participated in several significant pilot projects with the intent of obtaining operational knowledge and experience of technology driven system impacts. For example, we are pre-approved to construct up to 20 MW of photovoltaic (PV) facilities in Massachusetts as part of our ‘Solar Phase II’ programme. These PV sites are designed with advanced grid interactive control features, beyond what typical PV facilities are required to provide.

Operating and analysing the performance of these grid interactive controls will help prepare and future proof our system to enable a high penetration of the Distributed Energy Resources on the distribution system. We are also supporting several Department of Energy projects under the SunShot programme, aimed to further integration and proliferation of solar PV. As part of its ongoing Worcester Smart Energy Solutions pilot in Massachusetts, the Company is continuing to examine its learnings from the customer and grid technology as deployed. Lastly, the Company is also deploying Volt VAR Optimization and Conservation Voltage Reduction technology on several distribution circuits in Rhode Island, examining the impact of intelligent centralised distribution asset control.

US expenditure for gas research, development and deployment of new technologies during 2015/16 was $2.6 million. This is largely funded through a special Regulatory Order and customer surcharge mechanism in New York State. Primary investments were in the areas of robotic inspection tools and enhancements for condition assessments of the most difficult to inspect pipelines. In addition, new tools and techniques are being developed to increase safety of the workforce, improve welding practices and advance the inspection of polyethylene pipe construction, joint quality and the tracking and traceability of materials used in the construction of our transmission and distribution assets.

To further advance the safe operation of our systems and to improve overall customer safety, methane detection equipment is being deployed and tested both as mobile solutions to identify leakage in the field and in residential buildings. After completing extensive bench testing, we are implementing a pilot study in the use of existing and new technology for methane sensors within residential properties.

Unresolved SEC staff comments

There are no unresolved SEC staff comments required to be reported.

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Other disclosures195


Other unaudited financial information

Reconciliations of adjusted profit measures

 

Use of adjusted profit measures

In considering the financial performance of our businesses and segments, we analyse each of our primary financial measures of operating profit, profit before tax, profit for the year attributable to equity shareholders and EPS into two components.

 

The first of these components is referred to as an adjusted profit measure, also known as a business performance measure. This is the principal measure used by management to assess the performance of the underlying business.

 

Adjusted results exclude exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries. These items are reported collectively as the second component of the financial measures. Note 4 on page 103 explains in detail the items which are excluded from our adjusted profit measures.

 

Adjusted profit measures have limitations in their usefulness compared with the comparable total profit measures as they exclude important elements of our financial performance. However, we believe that by presenting our financial performance in two components it is easier to read and interpret financial performance between periods, as adjusted profit measures are more comparable having removed the distorting effect of the excluded items. Those items are more clearly understood if separately identified and analysed.

 

The presentation of these two components of financial performance is additional to, and not a substitute for, the comparable total profit measures presented.

 

Management uses adjusted profit measures as the basis for monitoring financial performance and in communicating financial performance to investors in external presentations and announcements of financial results.

 

Internal financial reports, budgets and forecasts are primarily prepared on the basis of adjusted profit measures, although planned exceptional items, such as significant restructurings, are also reflected in budgets and forecasts. We separately monitor and disclose the excluded items as a component of our overall financial performance.

 

Reconciliation of adjusted operating profit to total operating profit

Adjusted operating profit is presented on the face of the income statement under the heading operating profit before exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries.

  

      

     

      

          

    

     

       

   

    

     Year ended 31 March  
     

 

2015

£m

  

  

  

 

2014

£m

  

  

   

 

2013 

£m 

  

  

       
  

 

 
 

Adjusted operating profit

 

 3,863   3,664   3,639   
 Exceptional items    55   (84)  
 

Remeasurements – commodity contracts

 

 (83 16   180   
 Stranded cost recoveries       14   
  

 

 
 Total operating profit 

 

3,780

 

  

 

 

 

3,735

 

  

 

 

 

3,749 

 

  

 

  

 

 
  
  
  

Reconciliation of adjusted operating profit to adjusted earnings and earnings

Adjusted earnings is presented in note 7 to the consolidated financial statements on page 111.

   

   

 Year ended 31 March  
 

 

2015

£m

  

  

 

 

2014

£m

  

  

 

 

2013 

£m 

  

  

 

 

Adjusted operating profit

 3,863   3,664   3,639   

Adjusted net finance costs

 

 (1,033 (1,108 (1,124)  
Share of post-tax results of joint ventures and associates 46   28   18   

 

 

Adjusted profit before tax

 

 2,876   2,584   2,533   

Adjusted tax

 (695 (581 (619)  

 

 

Adjusted profit after tax

 

 2,181   2,003   1,914   

Attributable to non-controlling interests

 8   12   (1)  

 

 

Adjusted earnings

 

 2,189   2,015   1,913   

Exceptional items after tax

 

 (97 388   75   

Remeasurements after tax

 

 (73 73   156   

Stranded cost recoveries after tax

         

 

 

Earnings

 2,019   2,476   2,153   

 

 

 

Reconciliation of adjusted EPS to EPS

Adjusted EPS is presented in note 7 to the consolidated financial statements.

  

   

 Year ended 31 March  
 

 

2015

pence

  

  

 

 

2014

pence

  

  

 

 

2013 

pence 

  

  

 

 

Adjusted EPS

 58.1   53.5   50.9   

Exceptional items after tax

 

 (2.6 10.3   2.0   

Remeasurements after tax

 

 (1.9 1.9   4.1   

Stranded cost recoveries after tax

       0.2   

 

 

EPS

 53.6   65.7   57.2   

 

 

 

Reconciliation of adjusted operating profit excluding timing differences and major storms to total operating profit

Adjusted operating profit excluding timing differences and major storms is discussed on page 23.

    

   

 Year ended 31 March  
 

 

2015

£m

  

  

 

 

2014

£m

  

  

 

 

2013 

£m 

  

  

 

 

Adjusted operating profit excluding timing differences and major storms

 

 3,927   3,706   3,759   

Major storms

       (136)  

 

 

Adjusted operating profit excluding timing differences

 

 3,927   3,706   3,623   

Timing differences

 (64 (42 16   

 

 

Adjusted operating profit

 

 3,863   3,664   3,639   
Exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries (83 71   110   

 

 

Total operating profit

 3,780   3,735   3,749   

 

 

 

       186Use of adjusted profit measures


   Commentary on consolidated financial statements

   for the year ended 31 March 2014

In complianceconsidering the financial performance of our businesses and segments, we analyse each of our primary financial measures of operating profit, profit before tax, profit for the year attributable to equity shareholders and EPS into two components.

The first of these components is referred to as an adjusted profit measure, also known as a business performance measure. This is the principal measure used by management to assess the performance of the underlying business.

Adjusted results exclude exceptional items and remeasurements. These items are reported collectively as the second component of the financial measures. Note 4 on page 111 explains in detail the items which are excluded from our adjusted profit measures.

Adjusted profit measures have limitations in their usefulness compared with SEC rules,the comparable total profit measures as they exclude important elements of our financial performance. However, we presentbelieve that by presenting our financial performance in two components it is easier to read and interpret financial performance between periods, as adjusted profit measures are more comparable having removed the distorting effect of the excluded items. Those items are more clearly understood if separately identified and analysed.

The presentation of these two components of financial performance is additional to, and not a summarised analysissubstitute for, the comparable total profit measures presented.

Management uses adjusted profit measures as the basis for monitoring financial performance and in communicating financial performance to investors in external presentations and announcements of movementsfinancial results.

Internal financial reports, budgets and forecasts are primarily prepared on the basis of adjusted profit measures, although planned exceptional items, such as significant restructurings, are also reflected in budgets and forecasts. We separately monitor and disclose the excluded items as a component of our overall financial performance.

Reconciliation of adjusted operating profit to total operating profit

Adjusted operating profit is presented on the face of the income statement an analysisunder the heading operating profit before exceptional items and remeasurements.

   Year ended 31 March
   2016   2015   2014  
    £m   £m   £m  

Adjusted operating profit

   4,096     3,863    3,664 

Exceptional items

   (22)         55 

Remeasurements – commodity contracts

   11     (83  16 

Total operating profit

   4,085     3,780    3,735 

Reconciliation of movements in adjusted operating profit byto adjusted earnings and earnings

Adjusted earnings is presented in note 7 to the consolidated financial statements on page 118.

   Year ended 31 March
   2016    2015    2014  
    £m    £m    £m  

Adjusted operating profit

  4,096   3,863   3,664 

Adjusted net finance costs

  (1,013)  (1,033)  (1,108)

Share of post-tax results of joint ventures and associates

  59   46   28 

Adjusted profit before tax

  3,142   2,876   2,584 

Adjusted tax

  (753)  (695)  (581)

Adjusted profit after tax

  2,389   2,181   2,003 

Attributable to non-controlling interests

  (3)    12 

Adjusted earnings

  2,386   2,189   2,015 

Exceptional items after tax

  278   (97)  388 

Remeasurements after tax

  (73)  (73)  73 

Earnings

  2,591   2,019   2,476 

Reconciliation of adjusted EPS to EPS

Adjusted EPS is presented in note 7 to the consolidated financial statements.

   Year ended 31 March
   2016    20151    20141 
    pence    pence    pence  

Adjusted EPS

  63.5   57.6   53.1 

Exceptional items after tax

  7.4   (2.6)  10.2 

Remeasurements after tax

  (1.9)  (1.8)  1.9 

EPS

  69.0   53.2   65.2 

1.Comparative information has been restated to reflect the additional shares issued as scrip dividends.

Reconciliation of adjusted operating segment and a summarised analysis of movementsprofit excluding timing differences to total operating profit

Adjusted operating profit excluding timing differences is discussed on page 25. There were no major storms in the statement of2014, 2015, or 2016.

   Year ended 31 March
   2016  2015    2014  
    £m  £m    £m  

Adjusted operating profit excluding timing differences

  4,071  3,927   3,706 

Timing differences

  25  (64)  (42)

Adjusted operating profit

  4,096  3,863   3,664 

Exceptional items and remeasurements

  (11)  (83)  71 

Total operating profit

  4,085  3,780   3,735 

196

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16

Additional Information


   Additional Information

Commentary on consolidated financial position statements

for the year ended 31 March 2014. This should be read in conjunction with the 31 March 2015 unaudited commentary included on pages 87, 91 and 99.

In compliance with SEC rules, we present a summarised analysis of movements in the income statement, an analysis of movements in adjusted operating profit by operating segment and a summarised analysis of movements in the statement of financial position for the year ended 31 March 2015. This should be read in conjunction with the 31 March 2016 unaudited commentary included on pages 95, 99, 107 and 108.

Analysis of the income statement for the years ended

31 March 2015 and 31 March 2014 and

Revenue

Revenue for the year ended 31 March 2013

Revenue2015 increased by £392 million to £15,201 million. This increase was driven by higher revenues in our UK ET business, reflecting increases in allowed Transmission Owner revenues, and higher core allowances and pass-through costs in UK GT. Revenues in our UK GD business were slightly lower as a result of changes in allowed revenues for replacement expenditure (repex). Our US Regulated business revenues were also lower, as a result of the end of the LIPA MSA last year, partially offset by revenue increases from existing rate plans, including capex trackers, together with additional income from gas customer growth and the impact of the strengthening US dollar.

Revenue for the year ended 31 March 2014 increased by £450 million to £14,809 million. This increase was driven by higher revenues in our UK ET and UK GD businesses, principally as a result of the new RIIO regulatory arrangements. Revenue in our US Regulated businessesbusiness was also higher, reflecting higher pass-through costs such as gas and electricity commodity costs, partially offset by the end of Niagara Mohawk deferral revenue recoveries at March 2013 and the impact of the weaker dollar.

Operating costs

RevenueOperating costs for the year ended 31 March 2013 increased2015 of £11,421 million were £347 million higher than the prior year. This increase in costs included a £154 million year on year impact of changes in exceptional items and remeasurements, which is discussed below. Excluding exceptional items and remeasurements, operating costs were £193 million higher, principally due to: increases in controllable costs, including the impact of inflation and additional costs incurred in the US to improve data quality and bring regulatory filings up to date; higher US bad debt costs following last year’s exceptionally cold winter; and higher depreciation and amortisation as a result of continued investment programmes. These cost increases were partly offset by £527a reduction in spend on US financial systems implementation and stabilisation upgrades, with the project completing in the first half of this year.

Operating profit for the year ended 31 March 2015 included an £83 million to £14,359loss (2013/14: £16 million driven bygain) on remeasurement of commodity contracts. The year ended 31 March 2014 also included a net £55 million gain on exceptional items, including a net gain on the LIPA MSA transition in the US of £254 million; restructuring costs of £136 million, primarily in the UK ETas we reorganised certain parts of our business which increased by £300to deliver under the new RIIO price controls; and a £79 million principally due to inflationary increases in allowable revenue and higher pass-through costs. The UK GD segment also delivered an additional £114 million primarilyprovision for the same reason. Finally, US Regulated revenue was £123 million higher due to the recoverydemolition of Niagara Mohawk deferral revenues and higher FERC rate bases.

Operating costsUK gas holders that are no longer required.

Operating costs for the year ended 31 March 2014 of £11,074 million were £464 million higher than the prior year. This increase in costs was predominantly due to increases in pass-through costs in our UK and US regulated businesses,business, together with higher depreciation and amortisation as a result of continued investment and increases in our controllable costs.

Net finance costs

Exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries included in operating costs forFor the year ended 31 March 20142015, net finance costs before exceptional items and remeasurements were £39£75 million lower than the prior year. Net exceptional gains included in 2013/14 at £1,033 million, mainly as a result of £55 million primarily consisted of a net gain onlower average gross debt through the LIPA MSA transitionyear, lower RPI in the US of £254 million, a gain of £16 million following the sale to a third party of a settlement award, restructuring costs of £136 millionUK and UK gas holder demolition costs of £79 million. The 2013/14 results also included a gain of £16 million on remeasurements of commodity contracts.

There were no major storms affecting our operations in the year ended 31 March 2014. In 2012/13, two major storms in the US, Superstorm Sandy and Storm Nemo, increased operating costs by £136 million.

Operating costs for the year ended 31 March 2013 of £10,610 million were £313 million higher than the prior year. The increase in costs was predominantly due to increases in pass-through costs due to the colder winter in the US and inflationary increases in our controllable costs. Additional costs of £91 million were incurred in the stabilisation of our US enterprise resource planning system.

Exceptional items included in operating profit of £110 million in 2012/13 consisted of restructuring costs of £87 million, less a gain on sale of our EnergyNorth gas business and Granite State electricity business in New Hampshire of £3 million. There were also gains of £180 million on commodity contract remeasurements.

Net finance costsrefinancing debt at lower rates.

For the year ended 31 March 2014, net finance costs before exceptional items and remeasurements were £16 million lower than 2012/13 at £1,108 million, mainly due to the impact of the weaker dollar (£17 million).dollar.

Total net financeFinance costs for the year ended 31 March 2013 were slightly down compared with 2011/12 at £1,0862015 included exceptional debt redemption costs of £131 million dueand a loss of £34 million on financial remeasurements (2013/14: gain of £93 million), relating to the reduction in the cost of our index-linked debt, offset by the cost of carrying higher debt levels and loss on disposal of financial instruments.

Financial remeasurements relate to net gains and losses on derivative financial instruments.

Tax

The tax charge on profit before exceptional items and remeasurements for the year ended 31 March 2014 included a gain2015 was £114 million higher than 2013/14. This was mainly due to higher profits before tax and the non recurrence of £93 million (2012/13: gain of £68 million).

Taxone-off items that benefited the prior year.

The 2013/14 adjusted tax charge on profit before exceptional items and remeasurements was £38 million lower than 2012/13 at £581 million. This was mainly due to a 1% decrease in the UK statutory corporation tax rate in the year and a change in the UK/US profit mix where higher UK profits were taxed at the lower UK tax rate. Our tax charge was also affected by changes in tax provisions in respect of prior years.

For the year ended 31 March 2013, our adjustedExceptional tax charge wasfor 2014/15 of £78 million lower than 2011/12, mainly due to changes inprimarily represents tax provisions in respect of prior yearscredits on the exceptional items and a 2% decrease in the UK statutory corporation tax rate in the year, partially offset by increased taxes on higher taxable profits.

remeasurements described above.

Exceptional tax for 2013/14 included an exceptional deferred tax credit of £398 million arising from a reduction in the UK corporation tax rate from 23% to 21% applicable from 1 April 2014 and a further reduction to 20% from 1 April 2015.

A similar reduction in the UK corporation tax rate in 2012/13 from 24% to 23% resulted in a deferred tax credit of £128 million.

Adjusted earnings and EPS

As a result of the variances described above, adjusted earnings for the year ended 31 March 2014 was £2,0152015 were £2,189 million. For the year ended 31 March 2013,2014, adjusted earnings was £1,913were £2,015 million.

The above earnings performance translated into adjusted EPS growth in 2013/142014/15 of 2.6p (5%4.5p (8%) and 5.4p (12%2.7p (5%) in 2012/13.

2013/14.

In accordance with IAS 33, all EPS and adjusted EPS amounts for comparative periods have been restated for shares issued via scrip dividends and the bonus element of the 2010 rights issue.

 

LOGO

         NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15187                                 
National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Other unaudited financial information197


         Additional Information

    Other unaudited financial informationcontinued

    

 

Other unaudited financial informationcontinued

 

Analysis of the adjusted operating profit by segment for the year ended 31 March 20142015

UK Electricity Transmission

For the year ended 31 March 2014,2015, revenue in the UK Electricity TransmissionET segment increased by £277was £367 million higher at £3,754 million, and adjusted operating profit increased by £38£150 million to £1,237 million.

Net regulated income after pass-through costs was £170£230 million higher, principally reflecting increases in allowed Transmission Owner revenues under the new RIIO regulatory framework.this year and a £43 million benefit relating to legal settlements. This was partially offset by under-recoveries of allowed revenue in the year of £60£89 million compared with over-recoveriesunder-recoveries of £29£60 million in the prior year. Regulated controllable costs were £27£14 million higher due to inflation, legal feesorganisational change costs and one-off credits in the prior year.additional tower maintenance costs. Depreciation and amortisation was £20£33 million higher reflecting the continued capital investment programme (investment in the year was £1,381£1,074 million). Other costs were £4 million lowerhigher than prior year.

UK Gas Transmission

Revenue in the UK Gas TransmissionGT segment decreasedincreased by £177£81 million in 2013/142014/15 to £941£1,022 million and adjusted operating profit fellincreased by £114£20 million to £417£437 million.

Net regulated income after pass-through costs was £80£42 million lower, with lowerhigher due to earned gas permit income than prior year under the new RIIO arrangements.and constraints management incentives. In addition, under-recoveries of allowed revenue in the year of £18 million were £3 million favourable to last year’s under-recoveries of £21 million compared with over-recoveries last year of £17 million, gave rise to an adverse timing movement of £38 million. Depreciation and amortisation was £10Partially offsetting the revenue gains, regulated controllable costs were £8 million higher, duemainly as a result of additional system operator costs relating to investment, with £181 million invested in the year. Partially offsetting these, otherEU work and some organisation change costs. Other operating costs were £14also £17 million lower.

higher, including a £13 million provision for decommissioning the Avonmouth LNG plant. Capital investment remained around the same level as last year at £184 million.

UK Gas Distribution

UK Gas DistributionGD revenue increaseddecreased by £184£31 million in the year2014/15 to £1,898£1,867 million, and adjusted operating profit increaseddecreased by £110£78 million to £904£826 million.

Net regulated income after pass-through costs was £96£11 million higher,lower, reflecting increaseschanges in allowed revenues under the new RIIO regulatory framework.for replacement expenditure (repex). Timing differences added another £39reduced net revenues by a further £16 million, with £29£13 million over-recoveries in 2013/14,2014/15, compared with a £10£29 million under-recoveryover-recovery in the prior year. Partially offsetting these, regulatedRegulated controllable costs were £14£22 million higher primarily due to inflation.inflation and some organisation change costs. Depreciation and amortisation was £10£15 million higher reflecting the continued capital investment programme (investment in the year was £480£498 million). Other costs were £1£14 million higher, than prior year.reflecting a provision for additional asset protection costs.

US Regulated

Revenue in our US Regulated businessesbusiness was £122£54 million higherlower in 2014/15 at £8,040£7,986 million, andwhile adjusted operating profit fellincreased by £129£39 million to £1,125£1,164 million.

The weakerstronger dollar reducedincreased operating profit in the year by £38£30 million. Excluding the impact of foreign exchange, net regulated income fellincreased by £52£81 million, principally due toreflecting increased revenue from existing rate plans, including capex trackers, together with additional income from gas customer growth, partially offset by the impact of the end of deferral income recoveries at Niagara MohawkLIPA management services activities (MSA) in MarchDecember 2013. Timing differences added another £29In addition, over-recoveries of allowed revenues in the year of £30 million profit compared with prior year.were £20 million favourable to last year’s over-recoveries of £10 million. Regulated controllable costs increased by £89£17 million at constant currencyexcluding the impact of foreign exchange, as a result of inflationincreased gas leak and wage increases,compliance work and additional costs incurred to improve data quality and bring regulatory filings up to date, partly offset by the cessation of costs associated with the LIPA MSA activities. Bad debt costs were £62 million higher insurance costs post Superstorm Sandy, and cost true-ups identified duringexcluding the implementationimpact of the new enterprise resource planning system. Other operating costs (excluding major storms) increased by £61 million at constant currency due to the higher cost of non-major storm remediation, higher property taxes and depreciation of the new US enterprise resource planning system.

foreign exchange, following last year’s exceptionally cold winter.

There were no major storms affecting our operations in the yearyears ended 31 March 2014. In 2012/13, two major storms in the US, Superstorm Sandy2014 and Storm Nemo, reduced operating profit within US Regulated by £82 million at constant currency.

2015.

Our capital investment programme continued in the US, with a further £1,219£1,501 million invested in 2013/14.

2014/15, including gas leak reduction programmes and electricity capacity and reinforcement work.

Other activities

Revenue in Other activities increased by £58£26 million to £736£762 million in the year ended 31 March 2014.2015. Adjusted operating profit was £120£68 million higher at £131£199 million.

There was no repeat of the major storm cost of £51 million incurred in our insurance captive in the prior year due to Superstorm Sandy. Operating profit in the French interconnector was £62£18 million higher as a result of strong auction revenues this year. In the US, corporate and other activities losses were £63 million lower, mainly as a result of our other non-regulated businesses, adjusted operating profit was £7 million higher due to improved resultsfinance system upgrade completing in our UK metering business and insurance captive, partially offset by higher costs associated with the stabilisationfirst half of the new US enterprise resource planning system.

this year. Capital expenditureinvestment in our Other activities was £37£33 million lowerhigher at £180 million, principally reflecting reduced capital spend on the new US enterprise resource planning system.£213 million.

 

      188
198     National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Additional Information 


   Additional Information

 

 

Analysis of the statement of financial position for the year ended 31 March 20142015

Goodwill and other intangible assets

Goodwill and intangibles decreasedincreased by £354£684 million to £5,263£5,947 million as at 31 March 2014.2015. This decrease was dueincrease primarily relates to foreign exchange movements of £472£602 million and software amortisationadditions of £127£207 million, partially offset by software additionsamortisation of £179£121 million.

Property, plant and equipment

Property, plant and equipment increased by £587£3,544 million to £37,179£40,723 million as at 31 March 2014.2015. This was principally due to capital expenditure of £3,262£3,263 million on the renewal and extension of our regulated networks offset byand foreign exchange movements of £1,244£1,703 million, and £1,299offset by depreciation of £1,361 million of depreciation in the year.

Investments and other non-current assets

Investments in joint ventures and associates;associates, financial and other investments and other non-current assets decreasedincreased by £31£6 million to £722 million as at 31 March 2014.£728 million. This was principallyprimarily due to changesa decrease in investments in joint ventures of £33 million, which includes dividends received of £79 million, partially offset by our share of post-tax results for the fair valueyear of our US commodity contract assets and£46 million, more than offset by an increase in available-for-sale investments.

investments of £46 million.

Inventories and current intangible assets, and trade and other receivables

Inventories and current intangible assets, and trade and other receivables decreasedincreased by £78£53 million to £3,123£3,176 million as at 31 March 2014.2015. This decrease was principally due to foreign exchange movementsan increase in inventories and current intangible assets of £195£72 million, partially offset by an increasea net decrease in trade and other receivables of £120£19 million. The £19 million mostlydecrease consists of an increase in foreign exchange of £211 million due to colder weatherthe stronger US dollar against sterling and a decrease in the US in Februaryunderlying balances of £229 million, reflecting collection of large prior year balances, including LIPA MSA and March 2014 compared with 2013 resulting in increased billings for commodity costs and customer usage.

Superstorm Sandy re-insurance receivables.

Trade and other payables

Trade and other payables increased by £261 million to £3,292 million, primarily due to foreign exchange movements of £161 million and an increase in VAT liability following a change in regulations on wholesale gas and electricity trading.

Current tax balances

Current tax balances decreased by £20£33 million to £3,031£124 million as at 31 March 20142015. This was due to favourable foreign exchange movements of £150 million, partially offset by higher payables in the UK due in part to changes in payment terms with new Gas Distribution strategic partners and increased activity on the Western Link project.

Current tax liabilities

Current tax liabilities decreased by £63 million to £168 million at 31 March 2014. This was primarily due to higher tax payments made in 2013/14 although these were2014/15 being only partially offset by a largersmaller current year tax charge.

Deferred tax balances

Deferred tax liabilities

Deferred tax liabilitiesbalances increased by £5£215 million to £4,082£4,297 million as at 31 March 2014.2015. This was primarily due to the impact of the £172£299 million deferred tax chargecredit on actuarial gainslosses (a £179£172 million tax creditcharge in 2012/13)2013/14) being offset by the impact of the reduction in the UK statutory tax rate, for future periods, foreign exchange movements of £203 million and the reduction in prior year charges.

Provisions and other non-current liabilities

Provisions (both current and non-current) and other non-current liabilities decreasedincreased by £158£168 million to £3,486£3,654 million as at 31 March 2014.

2015. Total provisions decreasedincreased by £115£90 million to £1,645 million as at 31 March 2014.in the year. The underlying movements includedinclude additions of £230£105 million primarily relating to aan increase to the provision for the demolitionestimated environmental restoration and remediation costs for a number of certain gas holders in the UK of £79 million, restructuring provisions of £86 millionsites and other provisionsprovision increases of £42£57 million, more than offset bytogether with foreign exchange movements of £112£133 million, andoffset by utilisation of £288£209 million in relation to all classes of provisions.

Net debt

Net debt is the aggregate of cash and cash equivalents, current financial and other investments, borrowings, and derivative financial assets and liabilities.

Net pension and other post-retirement obligations

A summary of the total UK and US assets and liabilities and the overall net IAS 19 (revised) accounting deficit is shown below:

 

Other non-current liabilities decreased by £43 million principally due to foreign exchange movements of £47 million.

Net debt

Net debt is the aggregate of cash and cash equivalents, current financial and other investments, borrowings, and derivative financial assets and liabilities.

Net pension and other post-retirement obligations

A summary of the total UK and US assets and liabilities and the overall net IAS 19 (revised) accounting deficit is shown below:

Net plan liability   

 

UK 

£m 

  

  

  

 

US 

£m 

  

  

 

Total 

£m 

As at 1 April 2013

 

   

 

(1,169

 

 

  

 

(2,328

 

 

 

(3,497)

 

Exchange movements

 

   

 

– 

 

  

 

  

 

186

 

  

 

 

186 

 

Current service cost

 

   

 

(96

 

 

  

 

(129

 

 

 

(225)

 

Net interest cost

 

   

 

(47

 

 

  

 

(81

 

 

 

(128)

 

Curtailments and settlements – LIPA

 

   

 

– 

 

  

 

  

 

214

 

  

 

 

214 

 

Curtailments and settlements – other

 

   

 

(30

 

 

  

 

(12

 

 

 

(42)

 

Actuarial (losses)/gains

 

    

    – on plan assets

 

   

 

(98

 

 

  

 

283

 

  

 

 

185 

 

    – on plan liabilities

 

   

 

452

 

  

 

  

 

(152

 

 

 

300 

 

Employer contributions

 

   

 

235

 

  

 

  

 

361

 

  

 

 

596 

 

As at 31 March 2014

 

   

 

(753

 

 

  

 

(1,658

 

 

 

(2,411)

 

Represented by:

 

    

    Plan assets

 

   

 

17,409

 

  

 

  

 

5,849

 

  

 

 

23,258 

 

    Plan liabilities

 

   

 

(18,162

 

 

  

 

(7,507

 

 

 

(25,669)

 

    

 

(753

 

 

  

 

(1,658

 

 

 

(2,411)

 

The principal movements in net obligations during the year included a curtailment gain of £214 million following the LIPA MSA transition, net actuarial gains of £485 million and employer contributions of £596 million. Net actuarial gains included actuarial gains on plan liabilities of £542 million arising as a consequence of an increase in the UK real discount rate and the nominal discount rate in the US. This was partially offset by actuarial losses of £283 million arising from increases in life expectancy in the US. Actuarial losses/gains on plan assets reflects the asset allocations in the different plans. In both the UK and US, returns on equities were above the assumed rate; however, UK Government securities had negative returns and corporate bonds were close to nil.
Net plan liability  

UK

£m

  

US

£m

  

Total

£m

 

As at 1 April 2014

   (753  (1,658  (2,411

Exchange movements

       (236  (236

Current service cost

   (70  (116  (186

Net interest cost

   (27  (74  (101

Curtailments and other

   (34  (27  (61

Actuarial gains/(losses)

    

– on plan assets

   1,929    225    2,154  

– on plan liabilities

   (1,975  (950  (2,925

Employer contributions

   258    250    508  

As at 31 March 2015

   (672  (2,586  (3,258

Represented by:

    

Plan assets

   19,453    6,955    26,408  

Plan liabilities

   (20,125  (9,541  (29,666
    (672  (2,586  (3,258

The principal movements in net obligations during the year included net actuarial losses of £771 million and employer contributions of £508 million. Net actuarial losses included actuarial losses on plan liabilities of £2,746 million arising as a consequence of increases in the UK real discount rate and the nominal discount rate in the US. This was partially offset by actuarial gains of £2,154 million arising on plan assets.

Off balance sheet items

There were no significant off balance sheet items other than the contractual obligations shown in note 30(b) to the consolidated financial statements, and the commitments and contingencies discussed in note 27.

Through the ordinary course of our operations, we are party to various litigation, claims and investigations. We do not expect the ultimate resolution of any of these proceedings to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flows or financial position.

 

 

LOGO

        NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15189


 

Additional Information

 

Summary consolidated financial information

 

  

  

  

Financial summary (unaudited)

The financial summary set out below has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of National Grid for the five financial years ended 31 March 2015. It should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes, together with the Strategic Report. The information presented below for the years ended 31 March 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015 has been prepared under IFRS issued by the IASB and as adopted by the EU1.

  

     

 
      2015  2014   20131   20121  20111 
  

 

 
  

Summary income statement

        
 
  

Revenue

   15,201    14,809     14,359     13,832    14,343  
 
  

Operating profit

        
 
  

Before exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries

   3,863    3,664     3,639     3,491    3,619  
 
  

Exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries

   (83  71     110     44    145  
 
     3,780    3,735     3,749     3,535    3,764  
 
  

Profit before tax

        
 
  

Before exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries

   2,876    2,584     2,533     2,408    2,283  
 
  

Exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries

   (248  164     178     (26  151  
 
     2,628    2,748     2,711     2,382    2,434  
 
  

Profit for the year

   2,011    2,464     2,154     1,919    2,043  
 
  

Profit for the year attributable to equity shareholders

        
 
  

Before exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries

   2,189    2,015     1,913     1,709    1,627  
 
  

Exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries

   (170  461     240     208    412  
 
     2,019    2,476     2,153     1,917    2,039  
  

 

 
 
  

Earnings per share

        
 
  

Basic – continuing operations (pence)2

   53.6    65.7     57.2     51.1    56.3  
 
  

Diluted – continuing operations (pence)2

   53.4    65.4     57.0     50.8    56.0  
 
  

Basic (pence)2

   53.6    65.7     57.2     51.1    56.3  
 
  

Diluted (pence)2

   53.4    65.4     57.0     50.8    56.0  
  

 

 
 
  

Number of shares – basic (millions)3

   3,766    3,766     3,761     3,755    3,622  
 
  

Number of shares – diluted (millions)3

   3,783    3,785     3,779     3,774    3,641  
  

 

 
 
  

Dividends per ordinary share

        
 
  

Paid during the year (pence)

   42.25    40.85     39.84     37.40    37.74  
 
  

Approved or proposed during the year (pence)

   42.87    42.03     40.85     39.28    36.37  
 
  

Paid during the year ($)

   0.697    0.636     0.633     0.599    0.592  
 
  

Approved or proposed during the year ($)

   0.672    0.696     0.632     0.623    0.571  
  

 

 
          
          
          
          
          
          
          
          
          
          
          
          
          
          
          
          

       190


      2015  2014  20131   20121   20111  
  

 

 
  

Summary statement of net assets

 

        
  

Non-current assets

 

   49,058    44,895    45,129      41,684      39,787   
  

Current assets

 

   6,031    7,489    9,576      5,387      6,323   
  

Assets of businesses held for sale

 

           –      264      290   
  

Total assets

 

   55,089    52,384    54,705      47,335      46,400   
  

Current liabilities

 

   (7,374  (7,331  (7,445)     (6,004)     (6,826)  
  

Non-current liabilities

 

   (35,741  (33,134  (37,026)     (32,001)     (30,403)  
  

Liabilities of businesses held for sale

 

           –      (87)     (110)  
  

Total liabilities

 

   (43,115  (40,465  (44,471)     (38,092)     (37,339)  
  

Net assets

   11,974    11,919    10,234      9,243      9,061   
  

 

 
  

Shareholders’ equity

   11,962    11,911    10,229      9,236      9,052   
  

 

 
 
  

Summary cash flow statement

 

        
  

Cash generated from continuing operations

   5,350    4,419    4,037      4,487      4,854   
  

 

 
  

Tax (paid)/received

   (343  (400  (287)     (259)       
  

 

 
  

Net cash inflow from operating activities

 

   5,007    4,019    3,750      4,228      4,858   
  

Net cash flows used in investing activities

 

   (2,001  (1,330  (6,130)     (2,371)     (4,774)  
  

Net cash flows (used in)/from financing activities

 

   (3,253  (2,972  2,715      (1,900)     (430)  
  

Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents

   (247  (283  335      (43)     (346)  
  

 

 

1. For the year ended 31 March 2015, there have been no significant changes in accounting standards, interpretations or policies that have a material financial impact on the selected financial data. For the year ended 31 March 2014, the adoption of IAS 19 (revised) ‘Employee benefits’ resulted in a significant change in pensions and employee benefits accounting. The numbers included in the selected financial data above for the years 31 March 2011, 2012 and 2013 were restated to show the impact of IAS 19 (revised) had it been adopted since 2010.

2. Items previously reported for 2011 to 2014 have been restated to reflect the additional shares issued as scrip dividends.

3. Number of shares previously reported for 2011 to 2014 have been restated to reflect the impact of the additional shares issued as scrip dividends.

LOGO

        NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15191                


Additional Information

   Definitions and glossary of terms

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Other unaudited financial information199


Summary consolidated financial information

Financial summary (unaudited)

The financial summary set out below has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of National Grid for the five financial years ended 31 March 2016. It should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes, together with the Strategic Report. The information presented below for the years ended 31 March 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016 has been prepared under IFRS issued by the IASB and as adopted by the EU1.

    2016   2015  2014   20131   20121 

Summary income statement £m

         

Revenue

   15,115     15,201    14,809     14,359     13,832  

Operating profit

         

Before exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries

   4,096     3,863    3,664     3,639     3,491  

Exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries

   (11)     (83  71     110     44  
   4,085     3,780    3,735     3,749     3,535  

Profit before tax

         

Before exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries

   3,142     2,876    2,584     2,533     2,408  

Exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries

   (110)     (248  164     178     (26
   3,032     2,628    2,748     2,711     2,382  

Profit for the year

   2,594     2,011    2,464     2,154     1,919  

Profit for the year attributable to equity shareholders

         

Before exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries

   2,386     2,189    2,015     1,913     1,709  

Exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries

   205     (170  461     240     208  
    2,591     2,019    2,476     2,153     1,917  

Earnings per share

         

Basic – continuing operations (pence)2

   69.0     53.2    65.2     56.7     50.6  

Diluted – continuing operations (pence)2

   68.7     52.9    64.9     56.5     50.4  

Basic (pence)2

   69.0     53.2    65.2     56.7     50.6  

Diluted (pence)2

   68.7     52.9    64.9     56.5     50.4  

Number of shares – basic (millions)3

   3,755     3,798    3,798     3,794     3,788  

Number of shares – diluted (millions)3

   3,771     3,815    3,817     3,813     3,807  

Dividends per ordinary share

         

Paid during the year (pence)

   43.16     42.25    40.85     39.84     37.40  

Approved or proposed during the year (pence)

   43.34     42.87    42.03     40.85     39.28  

Paid during the year ($)

   0.664     0.697    0.636     0.633     0.599  

Approved or proposed during the year ($)

   0.635     0.672    0.696     0.632     0.623  

1.For the years ended 31 March 2015 and 31 March 2016, there have been no significant changes in accounting standards, interpretations or policies that have a material financial impact on the selected financial data. For the year ended 31 March 2014, the adoption of IAS 19 (revised) ‘Employee benefits’ resulted in a significant change in pensions and employee benefits accounting. The numbers included in the selected financial data above for the years 31 March 2012 and 2013 were restated to show the impact of IAS 19 (revised).
2.Items previously reported for 2012 – 2015 have been restated to reflect the impact of the bonus element of the rights issue and the additional shares issued as scrip dividends.
3.Number of shares previously reported for 2012 – 2015 have been restated to reflect the impact of the additional shares issued as scrip dividends.

200National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Additional Information


   Additional Information

    2016  2015  2014  20131  20121 

Summary statement of net assets

      

Non-current assets

   52,622    49,058    44,895    45,129    41,684  

Current assets

   6,312    6,031    7,489    9,576    5,387  

Assets of businesses held for sale

                   264  

Total assets

   58,934    55,089    52,384    54,705    47,335  

Current liabilities

   (7,721  (7,374  (7,331  (7,445  (6,004

Non-current liabilities

   (37,648  (35,741  (33,134  (37,026  (32,001

Liabilities of businesses held for sale

                   (87

Total liabilities

   (45,369  (43,115  (40,465  (44,471  (38,092

Net assets

   13,565    11,974    11,919    10,234    9,243  

Shareholders’ equity

   13,555    11,962    11,911    10,229    9,236  

Summary cash flow statement

      

Cash generated from continuing operations

   5,660    5,350    4,419    4,037    4,487  

Tax paid

   (292  (343  (400  (287  (259

Net cash inflow from operating activities

   5,368    5,007    4,019    3,750    4,228  

Net cash flows used in investing activities

   (4,036  (2,001  (1,330  (6,130  (2,371

Net cash flows (used in)/from financing activities

   (1,328  (3,253  (2,972  2,715    (1,900

Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

   4    (247  (283  335    (43

1.For the years ended 31 March 2015 and 31 March 2016, there have been no significant changes in accounting standards, interpretations or policies that have a material financial impact on the selected financial data. For the year ended 31 March 2014, the adoption of IAS 19 (revised) ‘Employee benefits’ resulted in a significant change in pensions and employee benefits accounting. The numbers included in the selected financial data above for the years 31 March 2012 and 2013 were restated to show the impact of IAS 19 (revised).

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16

Summary consolidated

financial information

201


Further information regarding financial KPIs and other performance measures

As part of our financial review on pages 22–25, various financial KPIs and performance measures are identified. Further details as to how these are calculated are provided below.

Group return on equity

The Group RoE calculation provides a measure of the performance of the whole Group compared with the amounts invested by the Group in assets attributable to equity shareholders.

Calculation: Regulatory financial performance including a long-run assumption of 3.0% RPI inflation, less adjusted interest and adjusted taxation divided by equity investment in assets.

Adjusted interest removes interest on pensions, capitalised interest and release of provisions.
Adjusted taxation adjusts the Group taxation charge for differences between IFRS profit before tax and regulated financial performance less adjusted interest.
Equity investment in assets is calculated as the total opening UK regulatory asset value, the total opening US rate base plus goodwill plus opening net book value of Other activities and our share of joint ventures and associates; minus opening net debt as reported under IFRS.

UK regulated return on equity

UK operational return is a measure of how a business is performing operationally against the assumptions used by the regulator. These returns are calculated using the assumption that the businesses are financed in line with the regulatory adjudicated capital structure, at the cost of debt assumed by the regulator and that RPI inflation is equal to a long-run assumption of 3.0%.

Calculation: Base allowed RoE plus or minus the following items:

Additional allowed revenues/profits earned in the year from incentive schemes, less associated corporation tax charge;
Totex outperformance multiplied by the company sharing factor set by the regulator; and
Revenues (net of associated depreciation and base allowed asset return) allowed in the year associated with incentive performance earned under previous price controls but not yet fully recovered, less associated corporation tax charge (excluding logging up or pensions recovery).

Divided by average equity RAV in line with regulatory assumed capital structure.

US regulated return on equity

US regulated RoE is a measure of how a business is performing operationally against the assumptions used by the regulator. This US operational return measure is calculated using the assumption that the businesses are financed in line with the regulatory adjudicated capital structure. This is a post-tax US GAAP metric as calculated annually (calendar year to 31 December).

Calculation: Regulated net income divided by equity rate base.

Regulated net income calculated as US GAAP operating profit less interest on the adjudicated debt portion of the rate base (calculated at the actual rate on long term debt, adjusted where the proportion of long term debt in the capital structure is materially different from the assumed regulatory proportion) less tax at the adjudicated rate.
Regulated net income is adjusted for earned savings as appropriate and for certain material specified items.
Equity rate base is the average rate base for the calendar year as reported to the Group’s regulators or, where a reported rate base is not available, an estimate based on rate base calculations used in previous rate filings multiplied by the adjudicated equity portion in the regulatory capital structure.

202National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Additional Information


   Additional Information

Definitions and glossary of terms

Our aim is to use plain English in this Annual Report and Accounts. However, where necessary, we do use a number of technical terms and/or abbreviations and we summarise the principal ones below, together with an explanation of their meanings. The descriptions below are not formal legal definitions.

 

 

A

American Depositary Shares (ADSs)

Securities of National Grid listed on the New York Stock Exchange, each of which represents five ordinary shares. They are evidenced by American Depositary Receipts or ADRs.

Annual General Meeting (AGM)

Meeting of shareholders of the Company held each year to consider ordinary and special business as provided in the Notice of AGM.

 

B

Board

The Board of Directors of the Company (for more information see pages 4347 and 178 and 179)48).

bps

Basis point (bps) is a unit that is equal to 1/100th of 1% and is typically used to denote the movement in a percentage based metric such as interest rates or RoE. A 0.1% change in a percentage represents 10 basis points.

BritNed

BritNed Development Limited.

 

C

called up share capital

Shares (common stock) that have been issued and have been fully paid for.

carrying value

The amount at which an asset or a liability is recorded in the Group’s statement of financial position and the Company’s balance sheet.

circuit

See route length.

the Company, the Group, National Grid, we, our or us

We use the terms ‘the Company’, ‘the Group’, ‘National Grid’, ‘we’, ‘our’ or ‘us’ to refer to either National Grid plc itself or to National Grid plc and/or all or certain of its subsidiaries, depending on context.

Connect21

The Company’s US strategy to build and operate a better energy distribution network for the 21st century digital economy, helping to move to a decarbonised future.

consolidated financial statements

Financial statements that include the results and financial position of the Company and its subsidiaries together as if they were a single entity.

contingent liabilities

Possible obligations or potential liabilities arising from past events for which no provision has been recorded, but for which disclosure in the financial statements is made.

 

D

Dth

Decatherm, being an amount of energy equal to 1 million British thermal units (BTUs), equivalent to approximately 293 kWh.

DB

Defined benefit, relating to our UK or US (as the context requires) final salary pension schemes.

DC

Defined contribution, relating to our UK or US (as the context requires) pension schemes to which National Grid, as an employer, pays contributions based on a percentage of employees’ salaries.

DECC

The Department of Energy & Climate Change, the UK Government ministry responsible for energy and climate change.

deferred tax

For most assets and liabilities, deferred tax is the amount of tax that will be payable or receivable in respect of that asset or liability in future tax returns as a result of a difference between the carrying value for accounting purposes in the statement of financial position or balance sheet and the value for tax purposes of the same asset or liability.

delivery body

Under the Energy Act 2013, and secondary legislation which came into force in August 2014, National Grid’s electricity system operator function became the EMR Delivery Body. In this role National Grid provides independent evidence and analysis to the UK Government to inform its decisions on the key rules and parameters to achieve the Government’s policy objectives under EMR. National Grid also administers the capacity mechanism, including running the annual capacity auctions, manages the allocation of contracts for difference to low carbon generators and reports to the Government annually on performance against the Government’s delivery plan.

demand side response (DSR)

Arrangements between the Company and certain customers, through which those customers agree to increase or reduce demand in response to a signal where the Company requires it.

derivative

A financial instrument or other contract where the value is linked to an underlying index, such as exchange rates, interest rates or commodity prices. In most cases, contracts for the sale or purchase of commodities that are used to supply customers or for our own needs are excluded from this definition.

Deposit Agreement

Deposit Agreement means the agreement entered into between National Grid Transco plc (now National Grid plc), the Depositary and the registered holders of ADRs, pursuant to which ADSs have been issued, dated as of 21 November 1995 and amended and restated as of 1 August 2005, and any related agreement.

Depositary

Depositary means theThe Bank of New York Mellon acting as depositary.

Directors/Executive Directors/Non-executive Directors

The Directors/Executive Directors and Non-executive Directors of the Company whose names are set out on page 43pages 47 and 48 of this document.

dollars or $

Except as otherwise noted all references to dollars or $ in this Annual Report and Accounts relate to the US currency.

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Definitions and glossary of terms203


Definitions and glossary of termscontinued

 

E

earnings per share (EPS)

Profit for the year attributable to equity shareholders of the parent allocated to each ordinary share.

Electricity Market Reform (EMR)

An energy policy initiative, introduced by the Energy Act 2013, designed to provide greater financial certainty to investors in both low carbon and conventional generation in order to meet environmental targets and maintain security of supply, and to do so at the lowest cost to consumers.

     192


employee engagement

A key performance indicator, based on the percentage of favourable responses to certain indicator questions repeated in each employee survey, which provides a measure of how employees think, feel and act in relation to National Grid. Research shows that a highly engaged workforce leads to increased productivity and employee retention, therefore we use employee engagement as a measure of organisational health in relation to business performance.

Estate Tax Convention

The Estate Tax Convention is the convention between the US and the UK for the avoidance of double taxation with respect to estate and gift taxes.

EU

The European Union, being the economic and political union of 28 member states located in Europe.

Exchange Act

The US Securities Exchange Act 1934, as amended.

 

F

FERC

The US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

finance lease

A lease where the asset is treated as if it was owned for the period of the lease and the obligation to pay future rentals is treated as if they were borrowings. Also known as a capital lease.

financial year

For National Grid this is an accounting year ending on 31 March. Also known as a fiscal year.

FRS

A UK Financial Reporting Standard as issued by the UK Financial Reporting Council (FRC). These apply to the Company’s individual financial statements on pages 159168 to 163,173, which are prepared in accordance with UK GAAP.FRS 101.

 

G

Grain LNG

National Grid Grain LNG Limited.

Great Britain

England, Wales and Scotland.

Group return on equity (Group RoE)

The Group return on equity calculation provides a measure of the performance of the whole Group compared with the amounts invested by the Group in assets attributable to equity shareholders. The Group return on equity measure is calculated using the Group capital employed in accordance with the definition used in the RoCE measures, adjusted for Group net debt and goodwill.

GW

Gigawatt, being an amount of power equal to 1 billion watts (109 watts).

GWh

Gigawatt hours, being an amount of energy equivalent to delivering 1 billion watts of power for a period of one hour.

 

H

HMRC

HM Revenue & Customs. The UK tax authority.

HVDC

High voltage, direct current electric power transmission which uses direct current for the bulk transmission of electrical power, in contrast with the more common alternating current systems.

 

I

IAS or IFRS

An International Accounting Standard or International Financial Reporting Standard, as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). IFRS is also used as the term to describe international generally accepted accounting principles as a whole.

individual financial statements

Financial statements of a company on its own, not including its subsidiaries or joint ventures.

 

J

joint venture

A company or other entity which is controlled jointly with other parties.

 

K

kV

Kilovolt, being an amount of electric force equal to 1,000 volts.

kW

Kilowatt, being an amount of power equal to 1,000 watts.

kWm

Kilowatt-month, being an amount of energy equivalient to delivering 1kW of power for a period of one month.

 

L

LIPA

The Long Island Power Authority.

LNG

Liquefied natural gas, being natural gas that has been condensed into a liquid form, typically at temperatures at or below -161°C (-258°F).

lost time injury (LTI)

An incident arising out of National Grid’s operations which leads to an injury where the employee or contractor normally has time off the following day or shift following the incident. It relates to one specific (acute) identifiable incident which arises as a result of National Grid’s premises, plant or activities, which was reported to the supervisor at the time and was subject to appropriate investigation.

lost time injury frequency rate (IFR)

The number of lost time injuries per 100,000 hours worked in a 12 month period.

 

M

MADPU

The Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities.

MSA

The managed services agreement, under which the Company maintained and operated the electricity transmission and distribution system on Long Island owned by LIPA, which was transitioned to a third party with effect from 31 December 2013.

MW

Megawatt, being an amount of power equal to 1 million watts.

MWh

Megawatt hours, being an amount of energy equivalent to delivering 1 million watts of power for a period of one hour.

LOGO
 

 

        NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15193                                 


     Additional Information

  Definitions and glossary of termscontinued

204National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Additional Information


   Additional Information

 

N

National Grid Metering (NGM)

National Grid Metering Limited, National Grid’s UK regulated metering business.

New England

The term refers to a region within the northeastern US that includes the states of Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island and Vermont. National Grid’s New England operations are primarily in the states of Massachusetts and Rhode Island.

northeastern US

The northeastern region of the US, comprising the states of Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island and Vermont.

NYPSC

The New York Public Service Commission.

 

O

Ofgem

The UK Office of Gas and Electricity Markets, part of the UK Gas and Electricity Markets Authority (GEMA), which regulates the energy markets in the UK.

OPEB

Other post-employment benefits.

ordinary shares

Voting shares entitling the holder to part ownership of a company. Also known as common stock. National Grid’s ordinary shares have a nominal value of 11 1743 pence.

 

P

price control

The mechanism by which Ofgem sets restrictions on the amounts of revenue we are allowed to collect from customers in our UK businesses. The allowed revenues are intended to cover efficiently incurred operational expenditure, capital expenditure and financing costs, including a return on equity invested.

PSA

The 15 year15-year power supply agreement with LIPA which came into effect on 28 May 2013, under which the Company supplies electricity to communities and businesses across Long Island.

 

R

rate base

The base investment on which the utility is authorised to earn a cash return. It includes the original cost of facilities, minus depreciation, an allowance for working capital and other accounts.

rate plan

The term given to the mechanism by which a US utility regulator sets terms and conditions for utility service including, in particular, tariffs and rate schedules. The term can mean a multi-year plan that is approved for a specified period, or an order approving tariffs and rate schedules that remain in effect until changed as a result of future regulatory proceedings. Such proceedings can be commenced through a filing by the utility or on the regulator’s own initiative.

regulated controllable operating costs

Total operating costs under IFRS less depreciation and certain regulatory costs where, under our regulatory agreements, mechanisms are in place to recover such costs in current or future periods.

regulatory asset value (RAV)

The value ascribed by Ofgem to the capital employed in the relevant licensed business. It is an estimate of the initial market value of the regulated asset base at privatisation, plus subsequent allowed additions at historical cost, less the deduction of annual regulatory depreciation. Deductions are also made to reflect the value realised from the disposal of certain assets that formed part of the regulatory asset base. It is also indexed to the RPI to allow for the effects of inflation.

return on capital employed (RoCE)

The return on capital employed metric is designed to give an alternative comparison between the UK and US businesses showing the overall return on capital provided by both debt and equity. The calculation reflects regulatory treatments of costs.

return on equity (RoE)

A performance metric measuring returns from the investment of shareholders’ funds. It is a financial ratio of a measure of earnings divided by an equity base.

revenue decoupling

Revenue decoupling is the term given to the elimination of the dependency of a utility’s revenue on the volume of gas or electricity transported. The purpose of decoupling is to eliminate the disincentive a utility otherwise has to encourage energy efficiency programmes.

RIIO

The revised regulatory framework issued by Ofgem which was implemented in the eight yeareight-year price controls which started on 1 April 2013.

RIPUC

The Rhode Island Public Utilities Commission.

route length

The route length of an electricity transmission line is the geographical distance from the start tower to the end tower. In most cases in the UK, and in many cases in the US, the transmission line consists of a double circuit for additional reliability. In such cases, the circuit length is twice the route length.

RPI

The UK retail price index as published by the Office for National Statistics.

 

S

Scope 1 greenhouse gas emissions

Scope 1 emissions are direct greenhouse gas emissions that occur from sources that are owned or controlled by the Company, for example, emissions from combustion in owned or controlled boilers, furnaces, vehicles, etc.

Scope 2 greenhouse gas emissions

Scope 2 emissions are greenhouse gas emissions from the generation of purchased electricity consumed by the Company. Purchased electricity is defined as electricity that is purchased or otherwise brought into the organisational boundary of the Company. Scope 2 emissions physically occur at the facility where electricity is generated.

Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions

Scope 3 emissions are indirect greenhouse gas emissions as a consequence of the operations of the Company, but are not owned or controlled by the Company, such as emissions from third-party logistics providers, waste management suppliers, travel suppliers, employee commuting, and combustion of sold gas by customers.

 

 

     194


National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Definitions and glossary of terms205


SEC

The US Securities and Exchange Commission, the financial regulator for companies with registered securities in the US, including National Grid and certain of its subsidiaries.

SEH Committee

The Safety, Environment and Health Committee of the Board whose role is explained on page 56.60.

SF6

Sulphur hexafluoride, an inorganic, colourless, odourless and non-flammable greenhouse gas. SF6 is used in the electrical industry as a gaseous dielectric medium for high voltage circuit breakers, switchgear and other electrical equipment. The Kyoto protocol estimated that the global warming potential over 100 years of SF6 is 23,900 times more potent than that of CO2.

share premium

The difference between the amount shares are issued for and the nominal value of those shares.

standard cubic metre

A quantity of gas which at 15°C and atmospheric pressure (1.013 bar) occupies the volume of 1m3.

stranded cost recoveries

The recovery of historical generation-related costs in the US, related to generation assets that are no longer owned by us.

STEM

Science, technology, engineering and mathematics; the Company is currently looking to recruit people with skills in these subjects.

subsidiary

A company or other entity that is controlled by National Grid.

swaption

A swaption gives the buyer, in exchange for an option premium, the right, but not the obligation, to enter into an interest rate swap at some specified date in the future. The terms of the swap are specified on the trade date of the swaption.

 

T

taxes borne

Those taxes that represent a cost to the Company and which are reflected in our results.

taxes collected

Those taxes that are generated by our operations but which do not affect our results; we generate the commercial activity giving rise to these taxes and then collect and administer them on behalf of HMRC.

Tax Convention

Tax Convention means the income tax convention between the US and the UK.

tonne

A unit of mass equal to 1,000 kilogrammes, equivalent to approximately 2,205 pounds.

tonnes carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e)

A measure of greenhouse gas emissions in terms of the equivalent amount of carbon dioxide.

treasury shares

Shares that have been repurchased but not cancelled. These shares can then be allotted to meet obligations under the Company’s employee share schemes.

TWh

Terawatt hours, being an amount of energy equivalent to delivering 1 billion watts of power for a period of 1,000 hours.

 

U

UK

The United Kingdom, comprising England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland.

UK Corporate Governance Code 2012 (the Code)

Guidance, issued by the Financial Reporting Council in September 2012, on how companies should be governed, applicable to UK listed companies, including National Grid, in respect of reporting periods beginning before 1 October 2014.

UK Corporate Governance Code 2014 (the New Code)

Updated guidance, issued by the Financial Reporting Council in September 2014, on how companies should be governed, applicable to UK listed companies, including National Grid, in respect of reporting periods beginning on or after 1 October 2014.

Grid.

UK GAAP

Generally accepted accounting principles in the UK. These differ from IFRS and from US GAAP.

UK regulated return on equity (UK RoE)

UK regulated return on equity is a measure of how a business is performing operationally against the assumptions used by Ofgem. These returns are calculated using the assumption that the businesses are financed in line with the regulatory adjudicated capital structure, at the assumed cost of debt and that UK taxation paid is at the level assumed by Ofgem.

US

The United States of America, its territories and possessions, any state of the United States and the District of Columbia.

US GAAP

Generally accepted accounting principles in the US. These differ from IFRS and from UK GAAP.

US regulated return on equity (US RoE)

US regulated return on equity is a measure of how a business is performing operationally against the assumptions used by the relevant regulator. This US operational return measure is calculated using the assumption that the businesses are financed in line with the regulatory adjudicated capital structure. This is a post-tax US GAAP metric as calculated annually (on a calendar year to 31 December).

US state regulators (state utility commissions)

In the US, public utilities’ retail transactions are regulated by state utility commissions, including the New York Public Service Commission (NYPSC), the Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities (MADPU) and the Rhode Island Public Utilities Commission (RIPUC).

 

V

value added

Value added is a measure to capture the value created through investment attributable to equity holders, being the change in total regulated and non-regulated assets including goodwill (both at constant currency) plus the cash dividend paid in the year plus share repurchase costs less the growth in net debt (at constant currency). This is then presented on an absolute and a per share basis.

value growth

Value growth is the growth in the value of our regulated and non-regulated assets including goodwill plus dividend plus share repurchase costs less net debt, onas a per share basis.percentage.

 

LOGO

        NATIONAL GRID ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2014/15
206National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Additional Information 195                                 


  Want more information or help?

Capita Asset Services

For queries aboutordinary shares:

The Bank of New York Mellon

For queries aboutAmerican

Depositary Shares:

Further information about National Grid including share price and interactive tools can be found on our website:www.nationalgrid.com

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

0371 402 3344

Calls are charged at the standard geographic rate and will vary by provider. Calls outside the UK will be charged at the applicable international rate. Lines are open 8.30am to 5.30pm, Monday to Friday, excluding public holidays. If calling from outside the

UK: +44 (0)371 402 3344

Visit the National Grid share portal

www.nationalgridshareholders.com

Email: nationalgrid@capita.co.uk

National Grid Share Register Capita Asset Services

The Registry

34 Beckenham Road

Beckenham, Kent BR3 4TU

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

1-800-466-7215

If calling from outside the US:

+1-201-680-6825

www.mybnymdr.com

Email: shrrelations@ cpushareownerservices.com

The Bank of New York Mellon

Depositary Receipts

PO Box 30170

College Station, Texas 77842-3170

Have you received unsolicited investment advice?

Shareholders are advised to be wary of any unsolicited advice or offers, whether over the telephone, through the post or by email. If you receive any such unsolicited communication please check the company or person contacting you is properly authorised by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) before getting involved. You can check at www.fca.org.uk/ consumers/protect-yourself and can report calls from unauthorised firms to the FCA by calling 0800 111 6768.

   Additional Information

Want more information or help?

Capita Asset Services

For queries aboutordinary shares:

The Bank of New York Mellon

For queries aboutAmerican Depositary Shares:

Further information about National Grid including share price and interactive tools can be found on our website:

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

0371 402 3344

Calls are charged at the standard geographic rate and will vary by provider. Calls outside the UK will be charged at the applicable international rate. Lines are open 8.30am to 5.30pm, Monday to Friday excluding public holidays. If calling from outside the UK: +44 (0)371 402 3344

Visit the National Grid share portal

www.nationalgridshareholders.com

Email: nationalgrid@capita.co.uk

National Grid Share

Register Capita Asset Services

The Registry

34 Beckenham Road

Beckenham, Kent BR3 4TU

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

1-800-466-7215

If calling from outside the US:

+1-201-680-6825

www.mybnymdr.com

Email: shrrelations@

cpushareownerservices.com

The Bank of New York Mellon

Depository Receipts

PO Box 30170

College Station, Texas 77842-3170

www.nationalgrid.com

Beware of share fraud

Fraudsters use persuasive and high-pressure tactics to lure investors into scams. Shareholders are advised to be wary of any unsolicited advice or offers, whether over the telephone, through the post or by email. If you receive any such unsolicited communication please check the company or person contacting you is properly authorised by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) before getting involved. You can check at www.fca.org.uk/consumers/protect-yourself and can report calls from unauthorised firms to the FCA by calling 0800 111 6768.

Financial calendar

The following dates have been announced or are indicative:

 

2 June 2016Ordinary shares go ex-dividend for 2015/16 final dividend
3 June 2016Record date for 2015/16 final dividend
9 June 2016Scrip reference price announced
20 June 2016Scrip election date
25 July 20162016 AGM
10 August 20162015/16 final dividend paid to qualifying shareholders
10 November 20162016/17 half year results
24 November 2016Ordinary shares go ex-dividend
25 November 2016Record date for 2016/17 interim dividend
11 January 20172016/17 interim dividend paid to qualifying shareholders
May 20172016/17 preliminary results
4 June 2015

Ordinary shares go ex-dividend for 2014/15Dividends

5 June 2015

Record date for 2014/15The Directors are recommending a final dividend of 28.34 pence per ordinary share ($2.0445 per ADS) to be paid on 10 August 2016 to shareholders on the register as at 3 June 2016. Further details in respect of dividend payments can be found on page 24. If you live outside the UK, you may be able to request that your dividend payments be converted into your local currency.

11 June 2015

Scrip reference price announced

22 June 2015

Scrip election date

21 July 2015

2015 AGM

2014/15 final dividend paidUnder the Deposit Agreement, a fee of up to qualifying5 August 2015

shareholders

10 November 2015

$0.05 per ADS can be charged for any cash distribution made to ADS holders, including cash dividends. ADS holders who receive cash in relation to the 2015/16 half year results

26 November 2015

Ordinary shares go ex-dividend

27 November 2015

Record date for 2015/16 interim dividend

2015/16 interim dividend paid to qualifying13 January 2016

shareholders

May 2016

2015/16 preliminary results

Dividends

The Directors are recommending a final dividend of 28.16 pence per ordinary share ($2.1866 per ADS) to be paid on 5 August 2015 to shareholders on the register as at 5 June 2015. Further details in respect of dividend payments can be found on page 23. If you live outside the UK, you may be able to request that your dividend payments be converted into your local currency.

Under the Deposit Agreement, a fee of up to $0.05 per ADS can be charged for any cash distribution made to ADS holders, including cash dividends. ADS holders who receive cash in relation to the 2014/15 final dividend will be charged a fee of $0.02 per ADS by the Depositary prior to the distribution of the cash dividend.

Have your dividends paid directly into your bank or building society account:

 Your dividend reaches your account on the payment day
 It is more secure – cheques do sometimes get lost in the post
 No more trips to the bank

Elect to receive your dividends as additional shares:

   Join our scrip dividend scheme

   No stamp duty or commission to pay

Join our scrip dividend scheme
No stamp duty or commission to pay

Electronic communications

To receive an email notifying you as soon as new shareholder information is available to view online, including your electronic tax voucher, sign up for electronic communications. Simply go to the National Grid share portalwww.nationalgridshareholders.com and once you have registered, click on the ‘manage your account’ link and follow the on screen instructions to change your communication preference.

Manage your shareholding online via the National Grid share portal:

   Have your dividends paid direct to your bank   account instead of receiving cheques

   Choose to receive your dividends in shares, via our   scrip dividend scheme

   Register your AGM vote

   Get copies of your dividend tax vouchers and view   your dividend payment history

   Update your address details

Have your dividends paid direct to your bank account instead of receiving cheques
Choose to receive your dividends in shares, via our scrip dividend scheme
Register your AGM vote
Get copies of your dividend confirmations and view your dividend payment history
Update your address details

Registered office

National Grid plc was incorporated on 11 July 2000. The Company is registered in England and Wales No. 4031152, with its registered office at 1-31–3 Strand, London WC2N 5EH.

Share dealing

Capita Share Dealing Services offer our European Economic Area resident shareholders a range of quick and easy share dealing services by post, online or telephone from 10p per share (plus stamp duty as applicable). Dealing at live prices is available online or by telephone, different fees apply.

Visitwww.capitadeal.com/nationalgrid or call Capita Share Dealing free on 0800 022 3374 for details and terms and conditions. This is not a recommendation to take any action. High street banks may also offer share dealing services. If you have any doubt as to what action you should take, please contact an authorised financial advisor.

                     196


ShareGift: If you only have a small number of shares which would cost more for you to sell than they are worth, you may wish to consider donating them to the charity.

ShareGift is a registered charity (no. 1052686) which specialises in accepting such shares as donations. For more information visit www.sharegift.org.uk or contact Capita Asset Services.

Individual Savings Accounts (ISAs): Corporate ISAs for National

Grid shares are available from Stocktrade. For more information, call Stocktrade on 0131 240 0443, email isa@stocktrade.co.uk or write to Stocktrade, 6th7th floor, Atria One, 144 Morrison Street, Edinburgh EH3 8BR.

 

National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Want more information or help?207


Cautionary statement

This document comprises the Annual Report and Accounts for the year ending 31 March 20152016 for National Grid and its subsidiaries.

It contains the Directors’ Report and Financial Statements, together with the independent auditors’ report thereon, as required by the Companies Act 2006. The Directors’ Report, comprising pages 0608 to 7581 and 164174 to 191,202, has been drawn up in accordance with the requirements of English law, and liability in respect thereof is also governed by English law. In particular, the liability of the Directors for these reports is solely to National Grid.

This document contains certain statements that are neither reported financial results nor other historical information. These statements are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These statements include information with respect to our financial condition, our results of operations and businesses, strategy, plans and objectives. Words such as ‘anticipates’, ‘expects’, ‘should’, ‘intends’, ‘plans’, ‘believes’, ‘outlook’, ‘seeks’, ‘estimates’, ‘targets’, ‘may’, ‘will’, ‘continue’, ‘project’ and similar expressions, as well as statements in the future tense, identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of our future performance and are subject to assumptions, risks and uncertainties that could cause actual future results to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by such forward-looking statements. Many of these assumptions, risks and uncertainties relate to factors that are beyond our ability to control or estimate precisely, such as changes in laws or regulations, announcements from and decisions by governmental bodies or regulators (including the timeliness of consents for construction projects); the timing of construction and delivery by third parties of new generation projects requiring connection; breaches of, or changes in, environmental, climate change and health and safety laws or regulations, including breaches or other incidents arising from the potentially harmful nature of our activities; network failure or interruption, the inability to carry out critical non network

operations and damage to infrastructure, due to adverse weather conditions including the impact of major storms as well as the results of climate change, due to counterparties being unable to deliver physical commodities, or due to the failure of or unauthorised access to or deliberate breaches of our IT systems and supporting technology; performance against regulatory targets and standards and against our peers with the aim of delivering stakeholder expectations regarding costs and efficiency savings, including those related to investment programmes and internal transformation and remediation plans; and customers and counterparties (including financial institutions) failing to perform their obligations to the Company. Other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially

from those described in this document include fluctuations in exchange rates, interest rates and commodity price indices; restrictions and conditions (including filing requirements) in our borrowing and debt arrangements, funding costs and access to financing; regulatory requirements for us to maintain financial resources in certain parts of our business and restrictions on some subsidiaries’ transactions such as paying dividends, lending or levying charges; inflation or deflation; the delayed timing of recoveries and payments in our regulated businesses and whether aspects of our activities are contestable; the funding requirements and performance of our pension schemes and other post-retirement benefit schemes; the failure to attract, train or retain employees with the necessary competencies, including leadership skills, and any significant disputes arising with our employees or the breach of laws or regulations by our employees; and the failure to respond to market developments, including competition for onshore transmission, the threats and opportunities presented by emerging technology, development activities relating to changes to the energy mix and the integration of distributed energy resources and the need to grow our business to deliver our strategy, as well as incorrect or unforeseen assumptions or conclusions (including unanticipated costs and liabilities) relating to business development activity, including assumptions in connection with joint ventures.

For further details regarding these and other assumptions, risks and uncertainties that may affect National Grid, please read the Strategic Report and the Risk factors on pages 173 and 176183 to 186 of this document. In addition, new factors emerge from time to time and we cannot assess the potential impact of any such factor on our activities or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual future results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement. Except as may be required by law or regulation, the Company undertakes no obligation to update any of its forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this document.

The contents of any website references in this document do not form part of this document.

Designed and produced by

CONRAN DESIGN GROUP

LOGO

Printed on Amadeus 100% Recycled Offset paper. The paper is independently certified according to the rules of the Forest Stewardship Council® (FSC). The manufacturing mill holds the ISO 14001 environmental certification and the EU Eco-label (EMAS). Printed by Pureprint Group, ISO 14001, FSC® certified and CarbonNeutral®.

LOGO
 

 

208National Grid Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16Additional Information 


LOGO


Further Information

Exchange Rates

The following table sets forth the history of the exchange rates of one pound sterling to US dollars for the periods indicated and as at the latest practicable date, 3 June 2015.

       High          Low    

June 2015*

  1.5331  1.5207

May 2014

  1.5789  1.5177

 

 

*  For

LOGO

Printed on Amadeus 100% Recycled Offset paper.

The paper is independently certified according to the

rules of the Forest Stewardship Council® (FSC). The

manufacturing mill holds the ISO 14001 environmental

certification and the EU Eco-label (EMAS).

Printed by Pureprint Group, ISO 14001, FSC®

certified and CarbonNeutral®.

Designed and produced by Addison Group


LOGO


Further Information

Exchange Rates

The following table sets forth the periodhistory of the exchange rates of one pound sterling to US dollars for the periods indicated and as at the latest practicable date, 3 June 2015.

Share ownership

       High          Low    

June 2016*

  1.4517  1.4414

May 2016

  1.4714  1.4351

At 3 June 2015, the latest practicable date, none of the directors had an individual beneficial interest amounting to greater than 1% of the Company’s shares.

Material interests in shares

The following summarizes the significant changes in the percentage ownership held by our major shareholders during the past three years:

Capital Group Companies, Inc. held 10.02% of our outstanding share capital as at 12 June 2012
*  For the period to 3 June 2016.

Share ownership

At 3 June 2016, the latest practicable date, none of the directors had an individual beneficial interest amounting to greater than 1% of the Company’s shares.

Material interests in shares

The following summarizes the significant changes in the percentage ownership held by our major shareholders during the past three years:

Capital Group Companies, Inc. held 10.02% of our outstanding share capital as at 12 June 2012Their shareholding increased to 10.91% of our outstanding share capital as at 31 March 2013, 11.02%as at 5 April 2013, 11.03% as at 31 March 2014 and then such holdings decreased to 4.981% as at 31 March 2013 and that such holdings increased as at 5 April 2013 to 11.02 % and then as at 31 March 2014 to 11.103%. As noted on page 180 of the 2014/2015 Annual Report and Accounts, we have been notified that Capital Group Companies, Inc. held 4.981% of our outstanding share capital as at 31 March 2015 and such holdings decreased as at 20 April 2015 to 3.881% which percentage remains unchanged as at 3 June 2015.

Since 31 March 2015, we have not been notified of any other subsequent significant change in the percentage of shares held by the shareholders, listed on page 180 of the 2014/2015 and then to 3.881% as at 20 April 2015. As noted on page 189 of the 2015/2016 Annual Report and Accounts, we have been notified that Capital Group Companies, Inc. held 3.88% of our outstanding share capital as at 31 March 2015 and such holdings remains unchanged as at 3 June 2016.

Black Rock, Inc. has held 5.21% of our outstanding share capital as at 5 June 2014 and 5 June 2015. As noted on page 189 of the 2015/2016 Annual Report and Accounts, we have been notified that Black Rock, Inc. held 5.88% of our outstanding share capital as at 31 March 2016 and such holdings decreased as at 26 May 2016 to 3.92% which percentage remains unchanged as at 3 June 2016

Since 31 March 2016, we have not been notified of any other subsequent significant change in the percentage of shares held by the shareholders, listed on page 189 of the 2015/2016 Annual Report and Accounts

Material interest in American Depositary Shares

As at 3 June 2015,2016, we had 15,49914,857 registered holders of our American Depositary Shares (ADSs) representing ownership of 9.7%10.9% of our issued and outstanding share capital, excluding ordinary shares held in treasury. As at 3 June 2015,2016, based on information available to us, we believe that approximately 9.7%10.9% of our issued and outstanding share capital (whether in the form of shares or ADSs), excluding shares held in treasury, was held beneficially in the United States.

Price history

The following table sets forth the highest and lowest intraday market prices for our ordinary shares and ADSs for the periods indicated.

 

    Ordinary Share 
(Pence)
  ADS ($)
      High        Low        High        Low   

June 2015*

  937.90  905.20  71.54  67.81

May 2015

  940.90  851.50  72.14  65.74

    Ordinary Share 
(Pence)
  ADS ($)
      High        Low        High        Low   

June 2016*

  1011.50  959.60  72.14  70.09

May 2016

  1015.50  953.01  74.67  71.48

 

 *  For the period to 3 June 2015,2016, the latest practicable date.

Subsequent Events

NONE APPLICABLE


Exhibits

Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC, National Grid has filed certain agreements as exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 20-F. These agreements may contain representations and warranties by the parties to them. These representations and warranties have been made solely for the benefit of the other party or parties to such agreement and (i) may be intended not as statements of fact, but rather as a way of allocating the risk to one of the parties to such agreements if those statements turn out to be inaccurate, (ii) may have been qualified by disclosures that were made to such other party or parties and that either have been reflected in the company’s filings or are not required to be disclosed in those filings, (iii) may apply materiality standards different from what may be viewed as material to investors and (iv) were made only as of the date of such agreements or such other date or dates as may be specified in such agreements.

In accordance with the instructions to Item 2(b)(i) of the Instructions to Exhibits to the Form 20-F, National Grid agrees to furnish to the SEC, upon request, a copy of any instrument relating to long-term debt that does not exceed 10 percent of the total assets of National Grid and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.


        

Description

       

1.1

    

Articles of Association of National Grid plc adopted by Special Resolution passed on 30 July 2012.

    Incorporated by reference

2(a)

    

Amended and restated Deposit Agreement dated as of 23 May 2013 among National Grid plc and The Bank of New York Mellon, as Depository, and all Owners and Holders from time to time of American Depositary Shares issued thereunder. (Exhibit 1 to National Grid plc Form F-6 dated 15 May 2013 File No. 333-178045)

    Incorporated by reference

2(b).1

    

Amended and Restated Trust Deed dated 26 July 2010 among National Grid plc, National Grid Electricity Transmission plc and the Law Debenture Trust Corporation p.l.c. relating to a €15,000,000,000 Euro Medium Term Note Programme. (Exhibit 2(b).1 to National Grid plc Form 20-F dated 13 June 2011 File No. 1-14958)

    Incorporated by reference

2(b).2

    

Amended and Restated Trust Deed dated 18 February 2011 among National Grid Gas plc, National Grid Gas Finance (no 1) plc and the Law Debenture Trust Corporation p.l.c. relating to a €10,000,000,000 Euro Medium Term Note Programme. (Exhibit 2(b).2 to National Grid plc Form 20-F dated 13 June 2011 File No. 1-14958)

    Incorporated by reference

2(b).3

    

Amended and Restated Trust Deed dated 22 February 2012 among National Grid Gas plc, National Grid Gas Finance (No 1) plc and the Law Debenture Trust Corporation p.l.c. relating to a €10,000,000,000 Euro Medium Term Note Programme. (Exhibit(Exhibit 2(b).3 to National Grid plc Form 20-F dated 12 June 2012 File No. 1-14958)

    Incorporated by reference

2(b).4

    

Amended and Restated Trust Deed dated 2 August 2011 among National Grid plc, National Grid Electricity Transmission plc and the Law Debenture Trust Corporation p.l.c. relating to a €15,000,000,000 Euro Medium Term Note Programme. (Exhibit 2(b).5 to National Grid plc Form 20-F dated 12 June 2012 File No. 1-14958)

    Incorporated by reference

2(b).5

    

Amended and Restated Trust Deed dated 27 March 2013 among National Grid Gas plc, National Grid Gas Finance (No 1) plc and the Law Debenture Trust Corporation p.l.c. relating to a €10,000,000,000 Euro Medium Term Note Programme. (Exhibit 2(b).5 to National Grid plc Form 20-F dated 6 June 2013 File No. 1-14958)

    Incorporated by reference

2(b).6

    

Amended and Restated Trust Deed dated 10 September 2012 among National Grid plc, National Grid Electricity Transmission plc and the Law Debenture Trust Corporation p.l.c. relating to a €15,000,000,000 Euro Medium Term Note Programme. (Exhibit 2(b).6 to National Grid plc Form 20-F dated 6 June 2013 File No. 1-14958)

    Incorporated by reference

2(b).7

    

Amended and Restated Trust Deed dated 12 September 2013 among National Grid plc, National Grid Electricity Transmission plc and the Law Debenture Trust Corporation p.l.c. relating to National Grid plc and National Grid Electricity Transmission plc €15,000,000,000 Euro Medium Term Note Programme.

    Incorporated by Referencereference

2(b).8

    

Amended and Restated Trust Deed dated 20 December 2013 among National Grid USA, National Grid North America Inc. and the Law Debenture Trust Corporation p.l.c. relating to National Grid USA €4,000,000,000 Euro Medium Term Note Programme.

    Incorporated by Referencereference

2(b).9

    

Amended and Restated Trust Deed dated 12 September 2014 among National Grid plc, National Grid Electricity Transmission plc and the Law Debenture Trust Corporation p.l.c. relating to National Grid plc and National Grid Electricity Transmission plc €15,000,000,000 Euro Medium Term Note Programme.

    Filed herewithIncorporated by reference

2(b).10

    

Amended and Restated Trust Deed dated 18 December 2014 among National Grid USA, National Grid North America Inc. and the Law Debenture Trust Corporation p.l.c. relating to National Grid USA €4,000,000,000 Euro Medium Term Note Programme.

    Filed herewithIncorporated by reference

2(b).11

    

Amended and Restated Trust Deed dated 18 July 2014 among National Grid Gas plc, National Grid Gas Finance (No 1) plc and the Law Debenture Trust Corporation p.l.c. relating to a €10,000,000,000 Euro Medium Term Note Programme.

    Incorporated by reference

2(b).12

Amended and Restated Trust Deed dated 14 August 2015 among National Grid Gas plc, National Grid Gas Finance (No 1) plc and the Law Debenture Trust Corporation p.l.c. relating to a €10,000,000,000 Euro Medium Term Note Programme.

Filed herewith

2(b).13

Amended and Restated Trust Deed dated 21 September 2015 among National Grid plc, National Grid Electricity Transmission plc and the Law Debenture Trust Corporation p.l.c. relating to National Grid plc and National Grid Electricity Transmission plc

Filed herewith


€15,000,000,000 Euro Medium Term Note Programme.

2(b).14

Amended and Restated Trust Deed dated 9 December 2015 among National Grid USA, National Grid North America Inc. and the Law Debenture Trust Corporation p.l.c. relating to National Grid USA €4,000,000,000 Euro Medium Term Note Programme.

Filed herewith

4(c).1

    

Service Agreement among The National Grid plc and Steven Holliday dated 1 April 2006. (Exhibit 4.(c).3 to National Grid Transco Form 20-F dated 19 June 2007 File No. 1-14958)

    Incorporated by reference


No. 1-14958)

4(c).2

    

Service Agreement among The National Grid plc and Andrew Bonfield dated 1 November 2010. (Exhibit 4(c).20 to National Grid plc Form 20-F dated 13 June 2011 File No 1-14958)

    Incorporated by reference

4(c).3

    

Service Agreement among National Grid Transco plc, National Grid Company plc and Nicholas Winser dated 28 April 2003. (Exhibit 4.8 to National Grid Transco Form 20-F dated 16 June 2004 File No. 1-14958)

Incorporated by reference

4(c).4

Employment Agreement among National Grid plc, National Grid USA and Thomas King dated 11 July 2007. (Exhibit 4 (c).9 to National Grid plc Form 20-F dated 17 June 2008 File No. 1-14958)

Incorporated by reference

4(c).5

Service Agreement among National Grid Electricity Transmission plc and John Mark Pettigrew dated 28 February2 November 2014. (Exhibit(Exhibit 4(c).5 to National Grid plc Form 20-F dated 5 June 2014 File No. 1-14958)

    Incorporated by reference

4(c).6.4

    

Letter of Appointment—Philip Aiken. (Exhibit 4 (c).11Amendment to Service Agreement .(Exhibit 4(c).5 to National Grid plc Form 20-F dated 175 June 20082014 File No. 1-14958) among National Grid Electricity Transmission plc and John Mark Pettigrew dated 2 November 2015

    Incorporated by referenceFiled herewith

4(c).7.5

    

Letter of Appointment—Sir Peter Gershon. (Exhibit 4(c).10 to National Grid plc Form 20-F dated 12 June 2012 File No. 1-14958)

    Incorporated by reference

4(c).8.6

    

Letter of Appointment—Paul Golby. (Exhibit 4(c).11 to National Grid plc Form 20-F dated 12 June 2012 File No. 1-14958)

    Incorporated by reference

4(c).9.7

    

Letter of Appointment—Ruth Kelly. (Exhibit 4(c).14 to National Grid plc Form 20-F dated 12 June 2012 File No. 1-14958)

    Incorporated by reference

4(c).10

Letter of Appointment—Maria Richter. (Exhibit 4.14 to National Grid Transco Form 20-F dated 16 June 2004 File No. 1-14958)

Incorporated by reference

4(c).11.8

    

Letter of Appointment—Nora Mead Brownell. (Exhibit 4(c).13 to National Grid plc Form 20-F dated 6 June 2013 File No. 1-14958)

    Incorporated by reference

4(c).12.9

    

Letter of Appointment—Mark Williamson. (Exhibit 4(c).14 to National Grid plc Form 20-F dated 6 June 2013 File No. 1-14958)

    Incorporated by reference

4(c).13.10

    

Letter of Appointment—Jonathan Dawson. (Exhibit 4(c).15 to National Grid plc Form 20-F dated 6 June 2013 File No. 1-14958)

    Incorporated by reference

4(c).14.11

    

Letter of Appointment—Therese Esperdy. (ExhibitEsperdy....(Exhibit 4(c).14 to National Grid plc Form 20-F dated 5 June 2014 File No. 1-14958)

    Incorporated by reference

4(c).15.12

    

Employment Agreement among National Grid plc, National Grid USA and Dean Seavers dated 22 October 2014.

    Filed herewithIncorporated by reference

4(c).16.13

    

National Grid plc Deferred Share Plan. (Exhibit 4.2 to National Grid plc S-8 dated 28 July 2011 File No. 333-175852)

    Incorporated by reference

4(c).17.14

    

National Grid Executive Share Option Plan 2002. (Exhibit 4 (c) to National Grid Group Form 20-F dated 21 June 2002 File No. 1-14958)

    Incorporated by reference

4(c).18.15

    

National Grid Group Share Matching Plan 2002. (Exhibit 4 (c) to National Grid Group Form 20-F dated 21 June 2002 File No. 1-14958)

    Incorporated by reference

4(c).19.16

    

National Grid Transco Performance Share Plan 2002 (as approved 23 July 2002 by a resolution of the shareholders of National Grid Group plc, adopted 17 October 2002 by a resolution of the Board of National Grid Group plc, amended 26 June 2003 by the Share Schemes Sub-Committee of National Grid Transco plc, and amended 5 May 2004 by the Share Schemes Sub-Committee of National Grid Transco plc). (Exhibit 4.19 to National Grid Transco Form 20-F dated 16 June 2004 File No. 1-14958)

    Incorporated by reference


4(c).20.17

    

National Grid Executive Share Option Scheme. (Exhibit 4D to National Grid Group S-8 dated 26 July 2001 File No. 333-65968)

    Incorporated by reference

4(c).21.18

    

Lattice Group Short Term Incentive Scheme (approved by a resolution of the shareholders of BG Group plc effective 23 October 2000; approved by a resolution of the Board of National Grid Transco plc on 30 April 2004; amended by resolutions of the Board of Lattice Group plc effective on 21 October 2002 and 13 May 2004). (Exhibit

Incorporated by reference


(Exhibit 4.23 to National Grid Transco Form 20-F dated 16 June 2004 File No. 1-14958)

    Incorporated by reference

4(c).22.19

   

National Grid USA Companies’ Defined Contribution Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan. (Exhibit 4.2 to National Grid plc S-8 dated 23 October 2012 File No. 14958)

    Incorporated by reference

8

   

List of subsidiaries—The list of the Company’s significant subsidiaries as of 31 March 20152016 is incorporated by reference to “Financial Statements—Notes to the consolidated financial statements—32. Subsidiary undertakings, joint venture and associates — Principal subsidiary undertakings” on page 150157 included in the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31 March 2015.2016. This list excludes subsidiaries that do not, in aggregate, constitute a “significant subsidiary” as defined in Rule 1-02(w) of Regulation S-X as at 31 March 2015.

    Incorporated by reference

12.1

   

Certification of Steve HollidayJohn Pettigrew pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act.

    Filed herewith

12.2

   

Certification of Andrew Bonfield pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act.

    Filed herewith

13.1

   

Certifications of Steve HollidayJohn Pettigrew and Andrew Bonfield furnished pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act (such certifications are not deemed filed for purpose of Section18 of the Exchange Act and not incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act).

    Filed herewith

15

   

Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, independent registered public accounting firm to National Grid plc.

    Filed herewith


The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorised the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.

 

 NATIONAL GRID PLC
 By:  /s/Andrew Bonfield  
   Andrew Bonfield  
   Finance Director  

London, England

57 June 20152016