UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM20-F

 

(Mark One)

 

REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

 

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

        For the fiscal year ended March 31, 20172019

OR

 

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

 

SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

        Date of event requiring this shell company report

                      For the transition period from             to             

Commission file number001-33098

Kabushiki Kaisha Mizuho Financial Group

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.

(Translation of Registrant’s name into English)

Japan

(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

1-5-5 Otemachi

Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo100-8176

Japan

(Address of principal executive offices)

Masahiro Kosugi,Tomomichi Fujita,+81-3-5224-1111,+81-3-5224-1059, address is same as above

(Name, Telephone, Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)

 

 

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act.

 

Title of each class

Trading Symbols

 

Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Stock, without par value

 

MFG

The New York Stock Exchange*

American depositary shares, each of which represents two shares of common stock MFGThe New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act.

None

 

(Title of Class)

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:

None

 

(Title of Class)

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report.

At March 31, 2017,2019, the following shares of capital stock were issued: 25,386,307,94525,392,498,945 shares of common stock (including 6,705,6046,520,138 shares of common stock held by the registrant as treasury stock).

 

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes  ☒    No  ☐

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Yes  ☐    No  ☒

Note—checkingChecking the box above will not relieve any registrant required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 from their obligations under those Sections.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of RegulationS-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, anon-accelerated filer, or an emerging growth company. See definition of “large accelerated filer, “accelerated filer,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer  ☒  Accelerated filer  ☐  Non-accelerated filer  ☐  Emerging growth company  ☐

If an emerging growth company that prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards† provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  ☐

 

The term “new or revised financial accounting standard” refers to any update issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board to its Accounting Standards Codification after April 5, 2012.

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

 

U.S. GAAP  ☒  International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board  ☐  Other  ☐

If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.

Item 17  ☐    Item 18  ☐

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes  ☐    No  ☒

(APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PAST FIVE YEARS)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.

☐  Yes  ☐     No  ☐

*

Not for trading, but only in connection with the registration and listing of the ADSs.

 

 


MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM20-F

Table of Contents

 

      Page 

Presentation of Financial and Other Information

   3 

Forward-Looking Statements

   3 

ITEM 1.

  Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers   5 

ITEM 2.

  Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable   5 

ITEM 3.

  Key Information   6 
  3.A.  

Selected Financial Data

   6 
  3.B.  Capitalization and Indebtedness   1110 
  3.C.  Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds   1110 
  3.D.  Risk Factors   11 

ITEM 4.

  Information on the Company   2123 
  4.A.  History and Development of the Company   2123 
  4.B.  Business Overview   2225 
  4.C.  Organizational Structure   4854 
  4.D.  Property, Plant and Equipment   5056 

ITEM 4A.

  Unresolved Staff Comments   5056 

ITEM 5.

  Operating and Financial Review and Prospects   5157 

ITEM 6.

  Directors, Senior Management and Employees   104110 
  6.A.  Directors and Senior Management   104110 
  6.B.  Compensation113
6.C.Board Practices119
6.D.Employees   124 
  6.C.6.E.  Board PracticesShare Ownership125

ITEM 7.

Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions127
7.A.Major Shareholders127
7.B.Related Party Transactions127
7.C.Interests of Experts and Counsel127

ITEM 8.

Financial Information128
8.A.Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information128
8.B.Significant Changes128

ITEM 9.

The Offer and Listing129
9.A.Listing Details129
9.B.Plan of Distribution129
9.C.Markets129
9.D.Selling Shareholders129
9.E.Dilution129
9.F.Expenses of the Issue129

ITEM 10.

Additional Information   130 
  6.D.10.A.  EmployeesShare Capital   134130 
  6.E.10.B.  Share OwnershipMemorandum and Articles of Association   135

ITEM 7.

Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions137130 
  7.A.10.C.  Major ShareholdersMaterial Contracts137
7.B.Related Party Transactions137
7.C.Interests of Experts and Counsel137

ITEM 8.

Financial Information138
8.A.Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information138
8.B.Significant Changes138

ITEM 9.

The Offer and Listing139
9.A.Listing Details139
9.B.Plan of Distribution140
9.C.Markets140
9.D.Selling Shareholders   141 
  9.E.10.D.  DilutionExchange Controls   141 
  9.F.10.E.  Expenses of the IssueTaxation   141

ITEM 10.

Additional Information142
10.A.Share Capital142
10.B.Memorandum and Articles of Association142
10.C.Material Contracts154
10.D.Exchange Controls154
10.E.Taxation155143 
  10.F.  Dividends and Paying Agents   161148 
  10.G.  Statement by Experts   161149 
  10.H.  Documents on Display   161149 
  10.I.  Subsidiary Information   161149 

      Page 

ITEM 11.

  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Credit, Market and Other Risk   162150 

ITEM 12.

  Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities   184169 
  12.A.  Debt Securities   184169 
  12.B.  Warrants and Rights   184169 
  12.C.  Other Securities   184169 
  12.D.  American Depositary Shares   184169 

ITEM 13.

  Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies   185170 

ITEM 14.

  Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds   185170 

ITEM 15.

  Controls and Procedures   185170 

ITEM 16A.

  Audit Committee Financial Expert   186171 

ITEM 16B.

  Code of Ethics   186171 

ITEM 16C.

  Principal Accountant Fees and Services   186171 

ITEM 16D.

  Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees   187172 

ITEM 16E.

  Purchase of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers   188173 

ITEM 16F.

  Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant   188173 

ITEM 16G.

  Corporate Governance   188173 

ITEM 16H.

  Mine Safety Disclosure   190175 

ITEM 17.

  Financial Statements   191176 

ITEM 18.

  Financial Statements   191176 

ITEM 19.

  Exhibits   191176 

Selected Statistical Data

   A-1 

Index to Consolidated Financial Statements

   F-1 

PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL AND OTHER INFORMATION

In this annual report, the terms “Mizuho Financial Group,” the “Group,“Mizuho group,” “we,” “us” and “our” generally refer to Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, but from time to time as appropriate to the context, those terms refer to Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. as an individual legal entity. Furthermore, unless the context indicates otherwise, these references are intended to refer to us as if we had been in existence in our current form for all periods referred to herein.

On July 1, 2013, a merger between the former Mizuho Bank, Ltd. and the former Mizuho Corporate Bank, Ltd. came into effect with the former Mizuho Corporate Bank as the surviving entity, which was renamed Mizuho Bank upon the merger. In this annual report, “Mizuho Bank” refers to the post-merger entity, while the “former Mizuho Bank” and the “former Mizuho Corporate Bank” refer topre-merger Mizuho Bank andpre-merger Mizuho Corporate Bank, respectively.

In this annual report, “our principal banking subsidiaries” refer to Mizuho Bank and Mizuho Trust & Banking Co., Ltd. (or with respect to references as of a date, or for periods ending, before July 1, 2013, to the former Mizuho Bank, the former Mizuho Corporate Bank and Mizuho Trust & Banking).

In this annual report, references to “U.S. dollars,” “dollars” and “$” refer to the lawful currency of the United States and those to “yen” and “¥” refer to the lawful currency of Japan.

In this annual report, yen figures and percentages have been rounded to the figures shown. However, in some cases, figures presented in tables have been adjusted to match the sum of the figures with the total amount, and such figures may also be referred to in the related text. In addition, yen figures and percentages in “Item 3.A. Key Information—Selected Financial Data—Japanese GAAP Selected Consolidated Financial Information” and others that are specified have been truncated to the figures shown.

Our fiscal year end is March 31. References to years not specified as being fiscal years are to calendar years.

Unless otherwise specified, for purposes of this annual report, we have presented our financial information in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or U.S. GAAP. Unless otherwise stated or the context otherwise requires, all amounts in our financial statements are expressed in yen.

We usually hold the ordinary general meeting of shareholders of Mizuho Financial Group in June of each year inChiyoda-ku, Tokyo.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

We may from time to time make written or oral forward-looking statements. Written forward-looking statements may appear in documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including this annual report, and other reports to shareholders and other communications.

The U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a “safe harbor” for forward-looking information to encourage companies to provide prospective information about themselves. We rely on this safe harbor in making these forward-looking statements.

This annual report contains forward-looking statements regarding the intent, belief, current expectations and targets of our management with respect to our financial condition and future results of operations. In many cases, but not all, we use such words as “aim,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “endeavor,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “probability,” “project,” “risk,” “seek,” “should,” “strive,” “target” and similar expressions in relation to us or our management to identify forward-looking statements. You can also identify forward-looking

statements by discussions of strategy, plans or intentions. These statements reflect our current views with respect

to future events and are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, our actual results may vary materially from those we currently anticipate. Potential risks and uncertainties include, without limitation, the following:

 

increase in allowance for loan losses and incurrence of significant credit-related costs;

 

declines in the value of our securities portfolio, including as a result of the declines in stock markets and the impact of the dislocation in the global financial markets;

 

changes in interest rates;

 

foreign exchange rate fluctuations;

 

decrease in the market liquidity of our assets;

 

revised assumptions or other changes related to our pension plans;

 

a decline in our deferred tax assets;

 

the effect of financial transactions entered into for hedging and other similar purposes;

 

failure to maintain required capital adequacy ratio levels;

 

downgrades in our credit ratings;

 

our ability to avoid reputational harm;

 

our ability to implement our Medium-termFive-Year Business Plan and other strategic initiatives and measures effectively;

 

the effectiveness of our operation, legal and other risk management policies;

 

the effect of changes in general economic conditions in Japan and elsewhere;

problems related to our information technology systems and cyber attacks; and

 

amendments and other changes to the laws and regulations that are applicable to us.

Our forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ from those in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors. We identify in this annual report in “Item 3.D. Key Information—Risk Factors,” “Item 4.B. Information on the Company—Business Overview,” “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” and elsewhere, some, but not necessarily all, of the important factors that could cause these differences.

We do not intend to update our forward-looking statements. We are under no obligation, and disclaim any obligation, to update or alter our forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

PART I

 

ITEM 1.

IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS

Not applicable.

 

ITEM 2.

OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE

Not applicable.

ITEM 3.

KEY INFORMATION

3.A. Selected Financial Data

The following tables set forth our selected consolidated financial data.

The first table below sets forth selected consolidated financial data of Mizuho Financial Group as of and for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018 and 20172019 derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of Mizuho Financial Group prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

The second table below sets forth selected consolidated financial data of Mizuho Financial Group as of and for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018 and 20172019 derived from Mizuho Financial Group’s consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in Japan, or Japanese GAAP.

The consolidated financial statements of Mizuho Financial Group as of and for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018 and 20172019 prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP have been audited in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) by Ernst & Young ShinNihon LLC, independent registered public accounting firm.

You should read the U.S. GAAP selected consolidated financial information presented below together with the information included in “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” and the audited consolidated financial statements, including the notes thereto, included in this annual report. The information presented below is qualified in its entirety by reference to that information.

U.S. GAAP Selected Consolidated Financial Information

 

 As of and for the fiscal years ended March 31,  As of and for the fiscal years ended March 31, 
 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017  2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 
 (in millions of yen, except per share data, share number information and  percentages)  (in millions of yen, except per share data, share number information and percentages) 

Statement of income data:

          

Interest and dividend income

 ¥1,423,375      ¥1,422,799      ¥1,457,659      ¥1,500,171      ¥1,509,030      ¥1,457,659  ¥1,500,171  ¥1,509,030  ¥1,761,886  ¥2,207,443 

Interest expense

  412,851   401,565   411,982   495,407   601,712  411,982  495,407  601,712  889,936  1,313,476 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net interest income

  1,010,524   1,021,234   1,045,677   1,004,764   907,318  1,045,677  1,004,764  907,318  871,950  893,967 

Provision (credit) for loan losses

  139,947   (126,230  (60,223  34,560   37,668  (60,223 34,560  37,668  (126,362 32,459 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net interest income after provision (credit) for loan losses

  870,577   1,147,464   1,105,900   970,204   869,650  1,105,900  970,204  869,650  998,312  861,508 

Noninterest income

  1,439,419   1,082,834   1,801,215   1,883,894   1,368,032  1,801,215  1,883,894  1,368,032  1,604,663  1,222,371 

Noninterest expenses

  1,424,816   1,503,955   1,639,462   1,657,493   1,757,307  1,639,462  1,657,493  1,757,307  1,763,677  1,998,819 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Income before income tax expense

  885,180   726,343   1,267,653   1,196,605   480,375  1,267,653  1,196,605  480,375  839,298  85,060 

Income tax expense

  4,024   226,108   437,420   346,542   91,244  437,420  346,542  91,244  237,604  9,335 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net income

  881,156   500,235   830,233   850,063   389,131  830,233  850,063  389,131  601,694  75,725 

Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

  5,744   1,751   27,185   (429  26,691  27,185  (429 26,691  24,086  (8,746
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net income attributable to MHFG shareholders

 ¥875,412  ¥498,484  ¥803,048  ¥850,492  ¥362,440  ¥803,048  ¥850,492  ¥362,440  ¥577,608  ¥84,471 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net income attributable to common shareholders

 ¥867,191  ¥491,739  ¥798,138  ¥848,062  ¥362,440  ¥798,138  ¥848,062  ¥362,440  ¥577,608  ¥84,471 

Amounts per share:

          

Basic earnings per common share—net income attributable to common shareholders

 ¥36.05  ¥20.33  ¥32.75  ¥34.19  ¥14.33  ¥32.75  ¥34.19  ¥14.33  ¥22.77  ¥3.33 

Diluted earnings per common share—net income attributable to common shareholders

 ¥34.47  ¥19.64  ¥31.64  ¥33.50  ¥14.28  ¥31.64  ¥33.50  ¥14.28  ¥22.76  ¥3.33 

Number of shares used to calculate basic earnings per common share (in thousands)

  24,053,282   24,189,670   24,368,116   24,806,161   25,285,899  24,368,116  24,806,161  25,285,899  25,366,345  25,362,376 

Number of shares used to calculate diluted earnings per common share (in thousands)

    25,365,229     25,371,252     25,381,047     25,387,033     25,380,302  25,381,047  25,387,033  25,380,302  25,373,931  25,366,898 

Cash dividends per share (1)(2):

          

Common stock

 ¥6.00  ¥6.50  ¥7.50  ¥7.50  ¥7.50  ¥7.50  ¥7.50  ¥7.50  ¥7.50  ¥7.50 
 $0.06  $0.06  $0.06  $0.07  $0.07  $0.06  $0.07  $0.07  $0.07  $0.07 

Eleventh series class XI preferred stock(3)

 ¥20.00  ¥20.00  ¥20.00  ¥20.00  ¥ ¥20.00  ¥20.00  ¥—    ¥—    ¥—   
 $0.21  $0.19  $0.17  $0.18  $ $0.17  $0.18  $—    $—    $—   

Thirteenth series class XIII preferred stock(4)

 ¥30.00  ¥  ¥ ¥ ¥
 $0.32  $  $ $ $

  As of and for the fiscal years ended March 31, 
  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017 
  (in millions of yen, except per share data, share number information and  percentages) 

Balance sheet data:

     

Total assets

 ¥178,744,794(5)  ¥175,697,452(5)  ¥190,114,354(5)  ¥193,810,151(5)  ¥200,456,304 

Loans, net of allowance

  69,060,526   72,858,777   77,528,017   77,104,122   81,804,233 

Total liabilities

  172,887,699(5)   169,076,081(5)   181,924,510(5)   185,626,960(5)   191,684,247 

Deposits

  100,221,556   102,610,154   114,206,441   117,937,722   131,184,953 

Long-term debt

  8,800,023(5)   9,852,048(5)   14,576,861(5)   14,765,527(5)   14,529,414 

Common stock

  5,460,821   5,489,295   5,590,396   5,703,144   5,826,149 

Total MHFG shareholders’ equity

  5,728,120   6,378,470   7,930,338   8,014,551   8,261,357 

Other financial data:

     

Return on equity and assets:

     

Net income attributable to common shareholders as a percentage of total average assets

  0.50  0.27  0.42  0.43  0.18

Net income attributable to common shareholders as a percentage of average MHFG shareholders’ equity

  18.76  9.64  13.86  13.33  5.25

Dividends per common share as a percentage of basic earnings per common share

  16.64  31.97  22.90  21.94  52.34

Average MHFG shareholders’ equity as a percentage of total average assets

  2.67  2.84  3.04  3.23  3.38

Net interest income as a percentage of total average interest-earning assets

  0.66  0.64  0.63  0.58  0.51

  As of and for the fiscal years ended March 31, 
  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019 
  (in millions of yen, except per share data, share number information and percentages) 

Balance sheet data:

     

Total assets

  ¥190,114,354(4)   ¥193,810,151(4)  ¥200,456,304  ¥204,255,642  ¥197,611,195 

Loans, net of allowance

  77,528,017   77,104,122   81,804,233   83,204,742   82,492,742 

Total liabilities

  181,924,510(4)   185,626,960(4)   191,684,247   194,751,942   188,109,702 

Deposits

  114,206,441   117,937,722   131,184,953   136,884,006   138,296,916 

Long-term debt

  14,576,861(4)   14,765,527(4)   14,529,414   12,955,230   11,529,400 

Common stock

  5,590,396   5,703,144   5,826,149   5,826,383   5,829,657 

Total MHFG shareholders’ equity

  7,930,338   8,014,551   8,261,357   8,868,421   8,726,519 

Other financial data:

     

Return on equity and assets:

     

Net income attributable to common shareholders as a percentage of total average assets

  0.42  0.43  0.18  0.28  0.04

Net income attributable to common shareholders as a percentage of average MHFG shareholders’ equity

  13.86  13.33  5.25  8.26  1.11

Dividends per common share as a percentage of basic earnings per common share

  22.90  21.94  52.34  32.94  225.23

Average MHFG shareholders’ equity as a percentage of total average assets

  3.04  3.23  3.38  3.35  3.71

Net interest income as a percentage of total average interest-earning assets

  0.63  0.58  0.51  0.47  0.48

 

Notes:

 

(1)

Yen amounts are expressed in U.S. dollars at the rate of ¥94.16 = $1.00, ¥102.98 = $1.00, ¥119.96 = $1.00, ¥112.42=¥112.42 = $1.00, ¥111.41= $1.00, ¥106.20= $1.00 and ¥111.41=¥110.68= $1.00 for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2017,2019, respectively. These rates are the noon buying rates on the respective fiscal year-end dates in New York City for cable transfers in yen as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

(2)

Figures represent cash dividends per share with respect to the applicable fiscal year. Dividends with respect to a fiscal year include year-end dividends and interim dividends. Declaration and payment of dividends are conducted during the immediately following fiscal year, in the case of year-end dividends, or immediately following interim period, in the case of interim dividends.

(3)

On July 1, 2016, we acquired ¥75.1 billion of eleventh series class XI preferred stock, in respect of which a request for acquisition was not made by June 30, 2016, and delivered shares of our common stock, pursuant to Article 20, Paragraph 1 of our articles of incorporation and a provision in the terms and conditions of the preferred stock concerning mandatory acquisition in exchange for common stock. On July 13, 2016, we cancelled all of our treasury shares of eleventh series class XI preferred stock.

(4)On July 11, 2013, we acquired and subsequently cancelled all of the thirteenth series class XIII preferred stock.
(5)

Total assets, total liabilities and long-term debt have been recalculated to reflect the retrospective adoption of ASU No.2015-03. See Notenote 2 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.

Japanese GAAP Selected Consolidated Financial Information

 

 As of and for the fiscal years ended March 31,  As of and for the fiscal years ended March 31, 
 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017  2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 
 (in millions of yen, except per share data and percentages)  (in millions of yen, except per share data and percentages) 

Statement of income data:

          

Interest income

 ¥1,421,609  ¥1,417,569  ¥1,468,976  ¥1,426,256  ¥1,445,555  ¥1,468,976  ¥1,426,256  ¥1,445,555  ¥1,622,354  ¥2,056,327 

Interest expense

  345,710   309,266   339,543   422,574   577,737  339,543  422,574  577,737  814,988  1,293,846 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net interest income

  1,075,898   1,108,303   1,129,433   1,003,682   867,818  1,129,433  1,003,682  867,818  807,366  762,480 

Fiduciary income

  48,506   52,014   52,641   53,458   50,627  52,641  53,458  50,627  55,400  55,153 

Net fee and commission income

  507,378   560,768   593,360   607,551   603,542  593,360  607,551  603,542  614,349  610,427 

Net trading income

  215,033   187,421   262,963   310,507   325,332  262,963  310,507  325,332  275,786  297,367 

Net other operating income

  324,899   126,774   209,340   246,415   245,419  209,340  246,415  245,419  162,454  87,306 

General and administrative expenses

  1,244,647   1,258,227   1,351,611   1,349,593   1,467,221  1,351,611  1,349,593  1,467,221  1,488,973  1,430,850 

Other income

  198,063   344,275   301,652   365,036   438,042  301,652  365,036  438,042  565,683  447,300 

Other expenses

  407,299   135,962   207,147   228,807   279,368  207,147  228,807  279,368  192,113  712,927 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Income before income taxes(1)

  717,832   985,366   990,632   1,008,252   784,193  990,632  1,008,252  784,193  799,953  116,259 

Income taxes:

          

Current(2)

  50,400   137,010   260,268   213,289   196,535  260,268  213,289  196,535  190,158  161,376 

Deferred

  7,461   77,960   44,723   69,260   (58,800 44,723  69,260  (58,800 1,469  (163,879

Profit(1)

  659,970   770,396   685,640   725,702   646,457  685,640  725,702  646,457  608,326  118,762 

Profit attributable tonon-controlling interests(1)

  99,454   81,980   73,705   54,759   42,913 

Profit attributable to non- controlling interests(1)

 73,705  54,759  42,913  31,778  22,196 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Profit attributable to owners of parent(1)

 ¥560,516  ¥688,415  ¥611,935  ¥670,943  ¥603,544  ¥611,935  ¥670,943  ¥603,544  ¥576,547  ¥96,566 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net income per share:

          

Basic

 ¥22.96  ¥28.18  ¥24.91  ¥26.94  ¥23.86  ¥24.91  ¥26.94  ¥23.86  ¥22.72  ¥3.80 

Diluted

  22.05   27.12   24.10   26.42   23.78  24.10  26.42  23.78  22.72  3.80 

Balance sheet data:

          

Total assets

 ¥177,411,062  ¥175,822,885  ¥189,684,749  ¥193,458,580  ¥200,508,610  ¥ 189,684,749  ¥ 193,458,580  ¥ 200,508,610  ¥ 205,028,300  ¥ 200,792,226 

Loans and bills discounted(3)

  67,536,882   69,301,405   73,415,170   73,708,884   78,337,793  73,415,170  73,708,884  78,337,793  79,421,473  78,456,935 

Securities

  53,472,399   43,997,517   43,278,733   39,505,971   32,353,158  43,278,733  39,505,971  32,353,158  34,183,033  29,774,489 

Deposits(4)

  99,568,737   101,811,282   113,452,451   117,456,604   130,676,494  113,452,451  117,456,604  130,676,494  136,463,824  137,649,596 

Net assets

  7,736,230   8,304,549   9,800,538   9,353,244   9,273,361  9,800,538  9,353,244  9,273,361  9,821,246  9,194,038 

Risk-adjusted capital data (Basel III)(5):

          

Common Equity Tier 1 capital

 ¥4,802,418  ¥5,304,412  ¥6,153,141  ¥6,566,488  ¥7,001,664  ¥6,153,141  ¥6,566,488  ¥7,001,664  ¥7,437,048  ¥7,390,058 

Tier 1 capital

  6,486,068   6,844,746   7,500,349   7,905,093   8,211,522  7,500,349  7,905,093  8,211,522  9,192,244  9,232,160 

Total capital

  8,344,554   8,655,990   9,508,471   9,638,641   10,050,953  9,508,471  9,638,641  10,050,953  10,860,440  10,917,507 

Risk-weighted assets

  58,790,617   60,274,087   65,191,951   62,531,174   61,717,158  65,191,951  62,531,174  61,717,158  59,528,983  57,899,567 

Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio

  8.16  8.80  9.43  10.50  11.34 9.43 10.50 11.34 12.49 12.76

Tier 1 capital ratio

  11.03   11.35   11.50   12.64   13.30  11.50  12.64  13.30  15.44  15.94 

Total capital ratio

  14.19   14.36   14.58   15.41   16.28  14.58  15.41  16.28  18.24  18.85 

 

Notes:

 

(1)

We have applied “Revised Accounting Standard for Business Combinations” (ASBJ Statement No.21, September 13, 2013) and others, and presentation of Net Incomenet income and others has been changed and presentation of Minority Interestsminority interests has been changed toNon-controlling Interests non-controlling interests from the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016.

(2)

Includes refund of income taxes.

(3)

Bills discounted refer to a form of financing in Japan under which promissory notes obtained by corporations through their regular business activities are purchased by banks prior to their payment dates at a discount based on prevailing interest rates.

(4)

Includes negotiable certificates of deposit.

(5)

Risk-adjusted capital data are calculated on a Basel III basis from the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013.basis. We adoptedutilize the advanced internal ratings-based approach (the “AIRB approach”) for the calculation of risk-weighted assets associated with credit risk from the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009. We also adoptedand the advanced measurement approach (the “AMA”) for the calculation of operational risk from the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010.risk. For more details on capital adequacy requirements set by the Bank for International Settlements (“BIS”), and the guideline implemented by the Financial Services Agency in compliance thereto, see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Capital Adequacy.”

There are certain differences between U.S. GAAP and Japanese GAAP. The differences between U.S. GAAP and Japanese GAAP applicable to us primarily relate to the accounting for derivative financial instruments and hedging activities, investments, loans, allowances for loan losses andoff-balance-sheet instruments, premises and equipment, land revaluation, business combinations, pension liabilities, consolidation of variable interest entities, deferred taxes and foreign currency translation.

In our financial results for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019, we recorded losses totaling ¥695.4 billion under Japanese GAAP in connection with carrying out our structural reforms as described in “Item 4.B. Business Overview—General—Recording of Losses in Light of Structural Reforms.” The losses consisted of (i) impairment losses on fixed assets and (ii) losses pertaining to the restructuring of securities portfolio, etc., in our markets division. We reviewed the application of impairment losses on long-lived assets in order to enhance the sophistication of our management accounting capabilities, and we also revised our future earnings plans, and branch network strategy, etc., for each business area pursuant to our new Five-Year Business Plan. As a result of these revisions, we recorded impairment losses on fixed assets of ¥500.7 billion under Japanese GAAP, including software attributable to the domestic retail business division and branches that are scheduled to be closed, as an extraordinary loss. Most of the corresponding losses have not been incurred under U.S. GAAP because of the differences in the accounting for impairment of long-lived assets between U.S. GAAP and Japanese GAAP, particularly those related to the allocation of long-lived assets that do not have identifiable cash flows largely independent of the cash flows of other asset groups to individual divisions. In connection with the implementation of the restructuring of the securities portfolio of the markets division in respect of our past investments in foreign bonds, etc., we recorded losses in the amount of ¥194.7 billion under Japanese GAAP. Most of the corresponding losses had already been recognized under U.S. GAAP in respect of our past investments in foreign bonds primarily because they were reported as trading securities under U.S. GAAP.

See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Reconciliation with Japanese GAAP.”

Exchange Rate Information

The following table sets forth,GAAP” for each period indicated,information on the noon buying rate in New York City for cable transfers in yen as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, expressed in yen per $1.00. The exchange rates are reference rates and are not necessarily the rates used to calculate ratios or the rates used to convert yen toreconciling items between our U.S. dollars in theGAAP financial statements contained in this annual report.and our Japanese GAAP financial statements for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019.

Fiscal years ended (ending) March 31,

  High   Low   Average(1)   Period
end
 
   (yen per dollar) 

2013

  ¥96.16   ¥77.41   ¥83.26   ¥94.16 

2014

   105.25    92.96    100.46    102.98 

2015

   121.50    101.26    110.78    119.96 

2016

   125.58    111.30    120.13    112.42 

2017

   118.32    100.07    108.31    111.41 

2018 (through May 31)

   114.19    108.40    111.08    110.71 

Calendar year 2017

    

January

  ¥117.68   ¥112.72    —      —   

February

   114.34    111.74    —      —   

March

   115.02    110.48    —      —   

April

   111.52    108.40    —      —   

May

   114.19    110.68    —      —   

Note:

(1)Calculated by averaging the exchange rates on the last business day of each month during the respective periods. The noon buying rate as of May 31, 2017 was ¥110.71 = $1.00.

3.B. Capitalization and Indebtedness

Not applicable.

3.C. Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds

Not applicable.

3.D. Risk Factors

Investing in our securities involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks described below as well as the other information in this annual report, including our consolidated financial statements and related notes, “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects,” “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Credit, Market and Other Risk” and “Selected Statistical Data.”

Our business, financial condition and operating results could be materially adversely affected by any of the factors discussed below. The trading price of our securities could decline due to any of these factors. This annual report also contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including the risks faced by us described below and elsewhere in this annual report. See “Forward-Looking Statements.”

Risks Relating to Our Business

We may be required to increase allowance for loan losses and/or incur significant credit-related and other costs in the future due to problem loans.

We are the primary bank lender for a large number of our corporate customers, and the amount of our loans and other claims to each of our major customers is significant. In addition, while we have made efforts to diversifyour credit exposure along industry lines, the proportion of credit exposure to customers in the manufacturing and real estate industries as well as banks and other financial institutions and real estate industries is relatively high. We manage ourcredit portfolio by regularly monitoring the credit profile of each of our customers, the progress made on restructuring plans and credit exposure concentrations in particular industries or corporate groups that are expected to be affected when risk events occur, and we also utilize credit derivatives for hedging and credit risk mitigation purposes. We provide an allowance for loan losses taking into consideration the borrower’s situation, the value of relevant collateral and guarantee, which we periodicallyre-evaluate, and economic trends based on our self-assessment standards as well as applicablecharge-off and allowance standards. However, depending on trends in the status of domestic and global economic environment,credit cycles, the business environment in particular industries, prices of real estate assets and other factors, the amount of our problem loans and other claims could increase significantly, including as a result of the deterioration in the credit profile of customers for which we are the primary bank lender, other major customers or customers belonging to industries to which we have significant credit exposure, and the value of collateral and guarantees could decline. There can be no assurance that credit-related and other costs, including provision for loan losses and charge-offs of loans, will not increase in the future as a result of the foregoing or otherwise.

Our equity investment portfolio exposes us to market risks that could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

We hold substantial investments in marketable equity securities, mainly common stock of Japanese listed companies. We have established the “Policy Regarding Cross-holding of Shares of Other Listed Companies” and, in light of the potential material adverse impact on our financial position associated with stock market volatility risk, we have decided to hold the shares of other companies as cross–shareholdingscross-shareholdings only when these holdings are meaningful, and we have accordingly sold a portion of such investments. In addition, in order to lower the risk of stock market volatility, we have been applying partial hedges as we deem necessary. However, significant declines in Japanese stock prices in the future would lead to unrealized losses, losses on impairment and losses from sales of equity securities. In addition, net unrealized gains and losses on such investments, based on Japanese GAAP, are taken into account when calculating the amount of capital for purposes of the calculation of our capital adequacy ratios, and as a result, a decline in the value of such investments would negatively affect such ratios. Accordingly, our financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Changes in interest rates could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

We hold a significant amount of bonds, consisting mostly of Japanese government bonds, and other instruments primarily for the purpose of investment. As a result of such holdings, an increase in interest rates, primarily yen interest rates, could lead to unrealized losses of bonds or losses from sales of bonds. In addition, due mainly to differences in maturities between financial assets and liabilities, changes in interest rates could have an adverse effect on our average interest rate spread. We manage interest rate risk under our risk management policies, which provide for adjustments in the composition of our bond portfolio and the utilization of derivatives and other hedging methods to reduce our exposure to interest rate risk. However, in the event of significant changes in interest rates, including as a result of a change in Japanese monetary policy, increased sovereign risk due to deterioration of public finances and market trends, our financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected by foreign exchange rate fluctuations.

A portion of our assets and liabilities is denominated in foreign currencies, mainly the U.S. dollar. ThedifferenceThe difference between the amount of assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies leads to foreigncurrencyforeign currency translation gains and losses in the event of fluctuations in foreign exchange rates. Although we hedge aportiona portion of our exposure to foreign exchange rate fluctuation risk, our financial condition and results of operationscouldoperations could be materially and adversely affected if future foreign exchange rate fluctuations significantly exceed ourexpectations.our expectations.

We may incur further losses relating to decreases in the market liquidity of assets that we hold.

The market liquidity of the various marketable assets that we hold may decrease significantly due to turmoil in financial markets and other factors, and the value of such assets could decline as a result. If factors such as turmoil in global financial markets or the deterioration of economic or financial conditions cause the market liquidity of our assets to decrease significantly, our financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Our pension-related costs could increase as a result of revised assumptions or changes in our pension plans.

Our pension-related costs and projected benefit obligations are calculated based on assumptions regarding projected returns on pension plan assets and various actuarial assumptions relating to the plans. If actual results differ from our assumptions or we revise our assumptions in the future, due to changes in the stock markets, interest rate environment or otherwise, our pension-related costs and projected benefit obligations could increase. In addition, any future changes to our pension plans could also lead to increases in our pension-related costs and projected benefit obligations. As a result, our financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

A decrease in deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance, due to a change in our estimation of future taxable income or change in Japanese tax policy could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

We recorded deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance, based on a reasonable estimation of future taxable income in accordancewithaccordance with applicable accounting standards. Our financial condition and results of operations could be materially andadverselyand adversely affected if our deferred tax assets decrease due to a change in our estimation of future taxable income, a change in tax rate as a result of tax system revisions or other factors. Because we consider the sale ofavailable-for-sale securities to be a qualifyingtax-planning strategy, turmoil in financial markets such as significant declines in stock prices could lead to a decrease in our estimated future taxable income.

Financial transactions entered into for hedging and other similar purposes could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

The accounting and valuation methods applied to credit and equity derivatives and other financialtransactionsfinancial transactions that we enter into for hedging and credit risk mitigation purposes are not always consistent with theaccountingthe accounting and valuation methods applied to the assets that are being hedged. Consequently, in some cases, duetodue to changes in the market or otherwise, losses related to such financial transactions during a given period mayadverselymay adversely affect net income, while the corresponding increases in the value of the hedged assets do not have an effect on net income for such period. As a result, our financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected during the period.

Failure to maintain capital adequacy ratios above minimum required levels, as a resultImpairment of the materializationcarrying value of risksour long-lived assets could materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

We periodically review our long-lived assets that are held for use for events or regulatory changes in circumstances that indicate possible impairment. Our impairment review is based on an undiscounted cash flow analysis of a group of assets, combined with associated liabilities, at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows exist. Impairment occurs when the carrying value of the asset group exceeds the future undiscounted cash flows that the asset group is expected to generate. When impairment is identified, the future cash flows are then discounted to determine the estimated fair value of the asset group and an impairment charge is recorded for the difference between the carrying value and the estimated fair value of the asset group. We cannot accurately predict the amount and timing of any impairment of long-lived assets. Should these assets not generate sufficient cash flows to justify their carrying value and we recognize impairment losses thereon, there could result in restrictionsbe a material adverse effect on our business activities.

We endeavor to maintain sufficient levelsfinancial condition and results of capital adequacy ratios, which are calculated pursuant tostandards set forth by Japan’s Financial Services Agency and based on Japanese GAAP, taking into account ourplans for investments in risk-weighted assets, the efficiency of our capital structure and other factors. However, our capital adequacy ratios could decline in the future, including as a result of the materialization of any of the risks enumerated in these “Risk Factors” and changes to the methods we use to calculate capital adequacy ratios. Also, there are regulatory adjustments such as goodwill and other intangibles, deferred tax assets, investments in the capital of banking, financial and insurance entities etc., that are deducted from our regulatory capital under certain conditions. Our or our banking subsidiaries’ regulatory capital and capital adequacy ratios could decline due to such regulations.

In addition, if the framework set by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, upon which the Financial Services Agency’s rules concerning banks’ capital adequacy ratios are based, is changed or if the Financial Services Agency otherwise changes its banking regulations, we might not be able to meet the minimum regulatory requirements for capital adequacy ratios.operations. For example, in December 2010, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision issued its Basel III rules text, which presents the details of global regulatory standards on bank capital adequacy and liquidity. In March 2012, the Financial Services Agency published revisions to its capital adequacy guidelines which generally reflect rules in the Basel III text and began phasing them in fromfiscal year ended March 31, 2013. Furthermore,2019 we have been named onerecorded ¥500.7 billion of impairment losses under Japanese GAAP, which unlike U.S. GAAP allows for the option of allocating entity-wide long-lived assets among individual divisions within an entity. The above losses involved entity-wide long-lived assets, consisting primarily of internally developed software allocated to the domestic retail business division for the purpose of the global systemically important banks(“G-SIBs”) and have become subject to additional capital requirements since March 2016. The group ofG-SIBsimpairment test under Japanese GAAP.

Our business will be updated annually and published by the Financial Stability Board (“FSB”) each November. The FSB published the final standard requiringG-SIBs to maintain total loss-absorbing capacity (“TLAC”) in November 2015. In addition, the Financial Service Agency published a policy to develop a framework in connection with such requirements in Japan in April 2016. Accordingly, we may become subject to such regulations beginning in 2019.

If the capital adequacy ratios of us and our banking subsidiaries fall below specified levels, the Financial Services Agency could require us to take corrective actions, including, depending on the level of deficiency, the submission of an improvement plan that would strengthen our capital base, a restriction on the outflow of capital, a reduction of our total assets or a suspension of a portion of our business operations. In addition, some of our banking subsidiaries are subject to capital adequacy regulations in foreign jurisdictions such as the United States, and our business could be adversely affected if theirwe encounter difficulties in raising funds.

We rely principally on deposits and bonds as our funding sources. In addition, we also raise funds in the financial markets. In particular, our foreign currency funding structure relies more on capital adequacy ratios fall below specified levels.markets compared to ouryen-based funding. Our efforts to maintain stable funding, such as setting maximum limits on financial market funding and monitoring our liquidity position to apply appropriate funding policies, may not be sufficient to prevent significant increases in our funding costs or, in the case mainly of foreign currencies, cash flow problems if we encounter difficulties in attracting deposits or otherwise raising funds. Such difficulties could result, among other things, from any of the following:

a reduction in the size and liquidity of the debt markets due for example to the decline in the domestic and global economy, concerns regarding the financial system or turmoil in financial markets and other factors;

adverse developments with respect to our financial condition and results of operations; or

downgrading of our credit ratings or damage to our reputation.

As a result, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Downgrades in our credit ratings could have negative effects on our funding costs and business operations.

Credit ratings are assigned to Mizuho Financial Group, our banking subsidiaries and a number of our other subsidiaries by major domestic and international credit rating agencies. The credit ratings are based on

information furnished by us or obtained by the credit rating agencies from independent sources and are also influenced by credit ratings of Japanese government bonds and general views regarding the Japanese financial system as a whole. The credit ratings are subject to revision, suspension or withdrawal by the credit rating agencies at any time. A downgrade in our credit ratings could result in, among other things, the following:

 

increased funding costs and other difficulties in raising funds;

 

the need to provide additional collateral in connection with financial market transactions; and

 

the termination or cancellation of existing agreements.

As a result, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

For example, assuming a downgrade occurred on March 31, 2019, the additional collateral requirement in connection with our derivative contracts absentif other changes, assuming a downgrade occurred on March 31, 2017,conditions remain unchanged, would have been approximately ¥5.5¥3.7 billion for aone-notch downgrade and approximately ¥8.0¥9.0 billion for atwo-notch downgrade.

Failure to maintain capital adequacy ratios and other regulatory standards above minimum required levels could have material adverse effects.

Our business will be adversely affected if we encounter difficulties in raising funds.Capital adequacy regulations

We rely principallyare subject to capital adequacy regulations as prescribed by the Financial Services Agency based on depositsthe Basel III rules text issued by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, both on a consolidated basis and bonds as our funding sources. In addition, we also raise funds in the financial markets. Our efforts to maintain stable funding, such as setting maximum limits on financial market funding and monitoring our liquidity position to apply appropriate funding policies, may not be sufficient to prevent significant increases in our funding costs or, in the case mainly of foreign currencies, cash flow problems if we encounter difficulties in attracting deposits or otherwise raising funds. Such difficulties could result, among other things, from any of the following:

adverse developments with respect to our financial condition and results of operations;

downgradingeach of our credit ratings or damageprincipal banking subsidiaries. The capital adequacy ratio rules will continue to our reputation; or

be applied in stages over several years, with full application scheduled to commence in January 2027 under the finalized Basel III reforms published by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision in December 2017. Furthermore, we have been named by the Financial Stability Board as a reduction“global systemically important bank”(G-SIB), and a higher level of capital adequacy ratio is applicable to us as a result. In addition, the list of G-SIBs, including their categorization regarding the level of additional required capital, are updated annually, and there is a possibility that we will be required to have a higher level of capital in the sizefuture. See “Item 5. Operating and liquidity of the debt markets due for example to the decline in the domesticFinancial Review and global economy, concerns regarding the financial system or turmoil in financial marketsProspects—Capital Adequacy” and other factors.

Our Medium-term“Item 4.B. Business PlanOverview—Supervision and other strategic initiatives and measures may not result in the anticipated outcome.Regulation—Capital Adequacy.”

We have been implementing strategic initiativesendeavor to maintain our capital adequacy ratios at an appropriate and measuressufficient level in various areas. In May 2016, we announcedlight of our Medium-term Business Plan forrisk-asset management plan that is integrated with our business strategy, capital efficiency needs and the three fiscal years ending March 31, 2019, in which we established a numberstatus of key targets that we aim to achieve by the end of the fiscal year ending March 31, 2019.

However, we may not be successful in implementing such initiatives and measures, or even if we are successful in implementing them, the implementation of such initiatives and measures may not have their anticipated effects. In addition, we may not be able to meet the key targets announced in the Medium-term Business Plan due to these or other factors, including, but not limited to, differences in the actual economic environment compared to our assumptions underlying the Medium-term Business Plan, as well as the risks enumerated in these “Risk Factors.” However, our and our principal banking subsidiaries’ capital adequacy ratios could decline in the future, including as a result of the materialization of any of the risks enumerated in these “Risk Factors” and changes to the methods of calculating capital adequacy ratios and other factors. Also, there are regulatory adjustments, such as those related to goodwill and other intangibles, deferred tax assets and investments in the capital of banking, financial and insurance entities, that are deducted from regulatory capital under certain conditions. Our or our principal banking subsidiaries’ regulatory capital and capital adequacy ratios could decline due to such regulations.

For further informationIf the capital adequacy ratios of us or our principal banking subsidiaries fall below specified levels, the Financial Services Agency could require us to take corrective actions, including, depending on the level of deficiency, the submission of a plan to limit the outflow of capital or an improvement plan that would strengthen the capital base, a reduction (or slowing of increase) of total assets, a reduction in the size of business operations, a disposition of subsidiary shares and a suspension of all or a portion of business operations. In addition, some of our Medium-term Business Plan, see “Item 4. Business Overview—General—Progressive Developmentbanking subsidiaries are subject to capital adequacy regulations in foreign jurisdictions such as the United States, and in the event of “One MIZUHO”—The Patha breach of these regulations, they could be subject to avarious restrictions and orders from local authorities. Such events could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Leverage ratio regulations

In December 2017, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision published the finalized Basel III reforms in which the framework for the leverage ratio requirements was finalized, and the phased application of the requirements, as prescribed by the Financial Services Consulting Group.Agency, commenced on March 31, 2019, with full application scheduled to take effect from January 2022 under the finalized Basel III reforms published by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision in December 2017. The regulation requires bank holding companies and banks to maintain their leverage ratio, which is a supplementary indicator of the capital adequacy ratio, at a certain level or above. See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Capital Adequacy” and “Item 4.B. Business Overview—Supervision and Regulation—Capital Adequacy. If the leverage ratio falls below that level, the Financial Services Agency could require us to take corrective actions, including the submission of an improvement plan that would strengthen the capital base, a reduction (or slowing of increase) of total assets, a reduction in the size of some business operations, a disposition of subsidiary shares and a suspension of all or a portion of business operations. Such events could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We will be exposedTotal Loss Absorbing Capacity (TLAC) regulations

In November 2015, the Financial Stability Board released a final document requiring G-SIBs to newhave a certain minimum total loss absorbing capacity (TLAC). The phased application by the Financial Services Agency of TLAC regulations in Japan to Japanese G-SIBs, including us, began on March 31, 2019 with full application, with certain limited exception, to take effect from March 31, 2022. These regulations are applicable to G-SIBs such as us, in addition to capital adequacy regulations. See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Capital Adequacy” and “Item 4.B. Business Overview—Supervision and Regulation—Capital Adequacy.” If the TLAC of us or increased risks as we expandour material subsidiaries fall below a certain threshold, the rangeFinancial Services Agency could require the submission of a plan to improve TLAC or may issue a business improvement order which could include various restrictions on, or suspension of portions of, our productsbusiness. Such events could adversely affect our business, financial condition and services.results of operations.

We offer a broad range of financial services, including banking, trust, securities and other services. As the needsCapital procurement

The capital raising that we conduct in light of our customersregulatory capital requirements, including those conducted in response to TLAC requirements but excluding Common Equity Tier 1 capital requirements, consists primarily of the issuance of debt instruments. However, in the event of a deterioration in our financial condition or results of operations, a downgrade in our credit rating, or the spread of negative rumors or other reputational damage, an economic downturn in Japan or overseas, financial system instability or financial market turmoil, we may become more sophisticated and broader in scope, and as the Japanese financial industry continuesunable to be deregulated, we have been entering into various new areas of business, including through various business and equity alliances, which expose us to new risks. While we have developed and intendraise capital at commercially reasonable costs, or at all. This could negatively affect our ability to maintain risk management policies that we believe are appropriate to address such risks, if a risk materializesor improve our capital adequacy ratios in a manner or to a degree outside ofaccordance with our expectations,plans, and our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Problems relating to our information technology (IT) systems could significantly disrupt our business operations.

We depend significantly on information technology systems with respect to almost all aspects of our business operations. Our information technology systems network, including those relating to bank accounting and cash settlement systems, interconnects our branches and other offices, our customers and various clearing and settlement systems located worldwide. We endeavor to sustain stable daily operations and develop contingency plans for unexpected events, including the implementation of backup and redundancy measures. Mizuho Bank and Mizuho Trust & Banking are working on shifting to our next-generation accounting system for the purpose of improving our customer service capabilities. Between June 2018 and July 2019, we completed the transition by Mizuho Bank to a new accounting system, and Mizuho Trust & Banking is scheduled to transfer to the new accounting system in July 2019. We are taking measures for a safe and steady transition, such as suspending online services during the transition period.

However, we may not be able to prevent significant disruptions to our information technology systems caused by, among other things, human error, accidents and development and renewal of computer systems. In the event of any such disruption, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected due to information leaks, malfunctions or disruptions in our business operations, liability to customers and others, regulatory actions or harm to our reputation.

Problems relating to cyber attacks could significantly impair our ability to protect our customer’s private information and disrupt our business operations.

Our business depends on the secure processing, storage and transmission of confidential and other information within our global IT systems. There have been a number of highly publicized cases involving financial services companies, consumer-based companies, governmental agencies and other organizations reporting the unauthorized disclosure of client, customer or other confidential information in recent years, as well as cyber attacks involving the dissemination, theft and destruction of corporate information or other assets, as a result of failure by employees or contractors to follow procedures or as a result of actions by third parties, including actions by foreign governments.

As we and our outside contractors continue to be the target of unauthorized access attacks, mishandling or misuse of information, computer viruses or malware, cyber attacks designed to obtain confidential information, destroy data, disrupt or degrade service, sabotage systems or cause other damage, denial of service attacks, data breaches and other events, there can be no assurance that we will not suffer any losses or other consequences in the future as a result of significant incidents due to these cyber attacks. Although our Cyber Incident Response Team (CIRT) has led the implementation of, and continuously endeavors to upgrade, our protective measures using advanced technologies, our IT systems, software and computer networks may be vulnerable to unauthorized access, misuse, computer viruses or other malicious code and other events that could have a security impact. Due to the complexity and interconnectedness of our global IT systems, these protective measures may be ineffective, and the process of enhancing our protective measures can itself create a risk of system disruption and security issues, and there can be no assurance that our current or future countermeasures will be sufficient to prevent or mitigate the impact of such incidents.

A cyber attack, information or security breach or a technology failure that involves us or our outside contractors could jeopardize our or our customers’, employees’, partners’, vendors’ or counterparties’ personal, confidential, proprietary or other information processed and stored in, and transmitted through, our and our outside contractors’ IT systems. Furthermore, such events could cause interruptions or malfunctions in our, our customers’, employees’, partners’, vendors’, counterparties’ or outside contractor’s operations, as well as the unauthorized release, gathering, monitoring, misuse, loss or destruction of confidential, proprietary and other information of ours, our employees, our customers or of other third parties. Any of these events could result in reputational damage with our customers and the market, customer dissatisfaction or financial losses, any of which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Our reputation could be harmed and we may be subject to liabilities and regulatory actions if we are unable to protect personal and other confidential information, including as a result of cyber attacks.

We handle various confidential ornon-public information, including those of our individual and corporate customers, in the ordinary course of our business. The information management policies we maintain and enforce to prevent information leaks and improper access to such information, including those that we require of our outside contractors and those designed to meet the strict requirements of the Personal Information Protection Act of Japan, may not be effective in preventing all such problems. Leakage of important information in the future, including as a result of cyber attacks, could result in liabilities and regulatory actions and may also lead to significant harm to our reputation. In addition, recent or future regulatory changes, such as the Japan Amended Personal Information Protection Act, the EU General Data Protection Regulation and the UK Competition and Markets Authority’s Open Banking standard, increase the risks relating to our ability to comply with rules that

impact our ability to protect information.Non-compliance with such regulations could result in regulatory proceedings, litigation, enforcement or the imposition of fines or penalties. As a result, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Inadequacies in anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing measures could subject us to regulatory actions and harm our reputation.

As financial crimes become more diverse and sophisticated, and incidents of terrorism continue to occur around the world, the importance of anti-money laundering measures and the need to counter the financing of terrorism is rapidly increasing and is a key priority for financial authorities worldwide, including Japan. We have developed a system to comply with applicable laws and regulations in Japan and overseas, and we are continuously implementing measures to further strengthen measures against money laundering. However, there can be no assurance that such measures will be effective in preventing all violations, and failure to comply with regulations and requirements can result in enforcement and/or regulatory proceedings. If we fail to meet the regulatory requirements to which we are subject, or to maintain risk and control procedures and processes that meet the heightened standards established by our regulators and other government agencies, we could be required to enter into settlements, comply with orders, pay additional fines, penalties or judgments, or accept material regulatory restrictions on our businesses. As a result, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.

Transactions with counterparties in Iran and other countries designated by the U.S. Department of State as state sponsors of terrorism may lead some potential customers and investors to avoid doing business with us or investing in our securities or have other adverse effects.

U.S. law generally prohibits U.S. persons from doing business with countries designated by the U.S. Department of State as state sponsors of terrorism (the “Designated Countries”), which currently includes Iran, Sudan (prohibitions partially lifted in October 2017), Syria and North Korea, and we maintain policies and procedures to comply with applicable U.S. laws. Ournon-U.S. offices engage in transactions relating to the Designated Countries on a limited basis and in compliance with applicable laws and regulations, including trade financing with respect to our customers’ export or import transactions and maintenance of correspondent banking accounts. In addition, we maintain a representative office in Iran. We do not believe our operations relating to the Designated Countries are material to our business, financial condition or results of operations. We maintain policies and procedures to ensure compliance with applicable Japanese and U.S. laws and regulations.

The laws and regulations applicable to dealings involving the Designated Countries are subject to further strengthening or changes. If the U.S. government considers that our compliance measures are inadequate, we may be subject to regulatory action which could materially and adversely affect our business. In addition, we may become unable to retain or acquire customers or investors in our securities, or our reputation may suffer, potentially having adverse effects on our business or the price of our securities.

Violations of laws and regulations related to financial market activities could subject us to adverse consequences such as regulatory actions and reputational harm.

In conducting our market operations in Japan and overseas, we are subject to the application of the laws and regulations of Japan and other countries and stock exchange rules, as well as being under the supervision of various financial authorities.

While we maintain compliance measures and endeavor to manage compliance risks, there can be no assurance that such measures will be effective in preventing all violations. Misconduct by employees, including improper or illegal conduct, can cause significant reputational harm as well as litigation and regulatory action. As a result, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected due to such regulatory actions and reputational damage.

We are subject to various laws and regulations, and violations could result in penalties and other regulatory actions.

Our business and employees in Japan are subject to various laws and regulations, including those applicable to financial institutions as well as general laws applicable to our business activities, and we are under the regulatory oversight of the Financial Services Agency. Our businesses outside of Japan are also subject to the laws and regulations of the jurisdictions in which they operate and are subject to oversight by the regulatory authorities of those jurisdictions.

Our compliance and legal risk management structures are designed to prevent violations of such laws and regulations, but they may not be effective in preventing all violations.

Violations of laws and regulations could result in regulatory action and harm our reputation, and our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Our Five-Year Business Plan and other strategic initiatives and measures may not result in the anticipated outcome.

We have been implementing strategic initiatives and measures in various areas. In May 2019, we announced our Five-Year Business Plan for the five fiscal years ending March 31, 2023. However, we may not be successful in implementing such initiatives and measures, or even if we are successful in implementing them, the implementation of such initiatives and measures may not have their anticipated effects. In addition, we may not be able to meet the key targets announced due to these or other factors, including, but not limited to, differences in the actual economic environment compared to our assumptions, as well as the risks enumerated in these “Risk Factors.”

For further information of our Five-Year Business Plan, see “Item 4. Business Overview—General and structural reforms.”

We will be exposed to new or increased risks as we expand the range of our products and services.

We offer a broad range of financial services, including banking, trust banking, securities and other services. As the needs of our customers become more sophisticated and broader in scope, and as the Japanese financial industry continues to be deregulated, we have been entering into various new areas of business, including through various business and equity alliances, which expose us to new risks. While we have developed and intend to maintain risk management policies that we believe are appropriate to address such risks, if a risk materializes in a manner or to a degree outside of our expectations, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Employee errors and misconduct could subject us to losses and reputational harm.

Because we process a large number of transactions in a broad range of businesses, we are subject to the risk of various operational errors and misconduct, including those caused by employees. Our measures to reduce employee errors, including establishment of operational procedures, regular reviews regarding compliance with these procedures, employee training and automation of our operations, may not be effective in preventing all employee errors and misconduct. Significant operational errors and misconduct could result in losses, regulatory actions or harm to our reputation. As a result, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Problems relating to our information technology systems could significantly disrupt our business operations.

We depend significantly on information technology systems with respect to almost all aspects of our business operations. Our information technology systems network, including those relating to bank accounting and cash settlement systems, interconnects our branches and other offices, our customers and various clearing and settlement systems located worldwide. Our efforts to sustain stable daily operations and development of contingency plans for unexpected events, including the implementation of backup and redundancy measures, as well as recently implemented measures to protect customers and our group from the rising threat of cyber attacks, illegal money transfers, targeted attacks and other risks, may not be effective in preventing significant disruptions to our information technology systems caused by, among other things, human error, accidents, cyber attacks, and development and renewal of computer systems. In the event of any such disruption, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected due to information leaks, malfunctions or disruptions in our business operations, liability to customers and others, regulatory actions or harm to our reputation.

Our reputation could be harmed and we may be subject to liabilities and regulatory actions if we are unable to protect personal and other confidential information.

We handle various confidential ornon-public information, including those of our individual and corporate customers, in the ordinary course of our business. The information management policies we maintain and enforce to prevent information leaks and improper access to such information, including those that we require of our outside contractors and those designed to meet the strict requirements of the Personal Information Protection Law of Japan, may not be effective in preventing all such problems. Leakage of important information in the future could result in liabilities and regulatory actions and may also lead to significant harm to our reputation. As a result, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Our business would be harmed if we are unable to attract and retain skilled employees.

Many of our employees possess skills and expertise that are important to maintain our competitiveness and to operate our business efficiently. We may not be successful in attracting and retaining sufficient skilled

employees through our hiring efforts and training programs aimed to maintain and enhance the skills and expertise of our employees, in which event our competitiveness and efficiency could be significantly impaired. As a result, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Our failure to establish, maintain and apply adequate internal controls over financial reporting could negatively impact investor confidence in the reliability of our financial statements.

As a New York Stock Exchange-listed company and an SEC registrant, we have developed disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting pursuant to the requirements of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and rules and regulations of the SEC promulgated pursuant thereto. Our management reports on, and our independent registered public accounting firm attests to, the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting, as required, in our annual report on Form20-F. In addition, our management is required to report on our internal control over financial reporting, and our independent registered public accounting firm is required to provide its opinion concerning the report of our management, in accordance with the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act of Japan. To the extent any issues are identified through the foregoing processes, there can be no assurance that we will be able to address them in a timely manner or at all. Furthermore, even if our management concludes that our internal control over financial reporting are effective, our independent registered public accounting firm may still be unable to issue a report that concludes that our internal control over financial reporting are effective. In either case, we may lose investor confidence in the reliability of our financial statements.

We are subject to risk of litigation and other legal proceedings.

As a financial institution engaging in banking and other financial businesses in and outside of Japan, we are subject to the risk of litigation for damages and other legal proceedings in the ordinary course of our business. Adverse developments related to legal proceedings could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Our risk management policies and procedures may not adequately address unidentified or unanticipated risks.

We devote significant resources to strengthen our risk management policies and procedures. Despite this, and particularly in light of the rapid evolution of our operations, our policies and procedures designed to identify, monitor and manage risks may not be fully effective. Some of our methods of managing risks are based upon our use of observed historical market behavior. As a result, these methods may not accurately predict future risk exposures, which could be significantly greater than the historical measures indicate. If our risk management policies and procedures do not function effectively, our financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Transactions with counterparties in Iran and other countries designated by the U.S. Department of State as state sponsors of terrorism may lead some potential customers and investors to avoid doing business with us or investing in our securities or have other adverse effects.

U.S. law generally prohibits U.S. persons from doing business with countries designated by the U.S. Department of State as state sponsors of terrorism (the “Designated Countries”), which currently includes Iran, Sudan and Syria and we maintain policies and procedures to comply with applicable U.S. laws. Ournon-U.S. offices engage in transactions relating to the Designated Countries on a limited basis and in compliance with applicable laws and regulations, including trade financing with respect to our customers’ export or import transactions and maintenance of correspondent banking accounts. In addition, we maintain a representative office in Iran. We do not believe our operations relating to the Designated Countries are material to our business, financial condition or results of operations. We maintain policies and procedures to ensure compliance with applicable Japanese and U.S. laws and regulations.

The laws and regulations applicable to dealings involving the Designated Countries are subject to further strengthening or changes. If the U.S. government considers that our compliance measures are inadequate, we may be subject to regulatory action which could materially and adversely affect our business. In addition, we may become unable to retain or acquire customers or investors in our securities, or our reputation may suffer, potentially having adverse effects on our business or the price of our securities.

We may be subject to risks related to dividend distributions.

As a holding company, we rely on dividend payments from our banking and other subsidiaries for almost all of our income. As a result of restrictions, such as those on distributable amounts under Japan’s Companies Act,

or otherwise, our banking and other subsidiaries may decide not to pay dividends to us. In addition, we may experience difficulty in making, or become unable to make, dividend payments to our shareholders and dividend or interest payments on capital securities issued by our group due to the deterioration of our results of operations and financial condition and/or the restrictions under the Companies Act or due to the strengthening of bank capital regulations. For more information on restrictions to dividend payments under the Companies Act and bank capital regulations, see “Item 10.B. Additional Information—Memorandum and Articles of Association” and “Item 4.B. Business Overview—Supervision and Regulation—Japan.”

We may be adversely affected if economic or market conditions in Japan or elsewhere deteriorate.

We conduct a wide variety of business operations in Japan as well as overseas, including in the United States, Europe and Asia. If general economic conditions in Japan or other regions were to deteriorate or if the financial markets become subject to turmoil, we could experience weakness in our business, as well as deterioration in the quality of our assets. We are currently facing significant uncertainties in the economic environment such as the introduction of the Bank of Japan’s new monetary policy, the negotiation for the withdrawal of the UK from the EU and the inauguration of the new administration of the United States. Significant changes in general economic conditions or financial markets due to the effect of changes inAs a country’s fiscal policy, political turmoil and manifestations of geopolitical risks could materially and adversely affectresult, our financial condition and results of operations.operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Amendments and other changes to the laws and regulations that are applicable to us could have an adverse effect on us.

We are subject to general laws, regulations and accounting rules applicable to our business activities in and outside of Japan. We are also subject to various laws and regulations applicable to financial institutions such as the Banking Act, including capital adequacy requirements, in and outside of Japan. If the laws and regulations that are applicable to us are amended or otherwise changed, such as in a way that restricts us from engaging in business activities that we currently conduct or that requires us to incur additional costs related to our IT systems, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision is currently discussing a reviewUncertainties regarding the future of the standardized approach, internal ratings-based approachLIBOR as an interest rate benchmark and capital floors in calculating the capital adequacy ratio. There is a risk thatany successor thereto subjects us to various risks.

Many of our capital adequacy ratio will decrease if the review results in an increase in the amount of the denominator relatedproducts and services refer to our capital adequacy ratio calculation.

Moreover, future applications of or changes in other financial regulations that are continually under discussion, including liquidity standardsbenchmark interest rates such as the Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR)London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) in many currencies, including the U.S. dollar. We also utilize such benchmark interest rates for our own evaluation of financial instruments and leverage ratio regulations,various other internal management purposes.

In light of the LIBOR manipulation scandal that surfaced in 2012, many financial authorities around the world have commented on a transition to the risk-free rate as the benchmark interest rate to improve reliability and transparency. In addition, in July 2017, the Chief Executive of the Financial Conduct Authority of the United Kingdom (“FCA”), which regulates LIBOR, announced that the FCA will no longer persuade or compel banks to present rates for the calculation of the LIBOR benchmark after 2021, raising the possibility that the continuation of LIBOR on the current basis cannot be guaranteed after 2021, and there is a substantial risk that LIBOR will be discontinued or modified by 2021.

We have established a special division tasked to prepare us for the suspension of publication of LIBOR and the shift to a successor interest rate benchmark. Many unresolved issues remain, such as the selection of successor benchmarks, the timing of their introduction and the transition of a particular benchmark to a replacement rate could result in restrictionswide spread dislocation in the financial markets, engender volatility in the pricing of securities, derivatives and other instruments, and suppress capital markets activities. As a result, the transition could, for example, cause hedging accounting items to be derecognized and increase litigation risks regarding our existing products and services, which could adversely impact our profitability. There can be no assurance that a change in the benchmark interest rate and related valuation methods will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. We may also be adversely affected if the change restricts our ability to conduct our businesses as well asprovide products and services or if it necessitates the need to incurdevelopment of additional information technology development expenses.systems.

Intensification of competition in the market for financial services in Japan could have an adverse effect on us.

We offer comprehensive financial services globally, centered on Banking, Trust Bankingbanking, trust banking and Securitiessecurities, and are subject to intense competition both domestically and internationally with large financial institutions,non-bank financial institutions and others. In addition, as a result of technological advances called “FinTech,” an increasing number of companies have recently been crossing industry lines and entering the field of finance, and

it is possible that the competitive environment surrounding us may further intensify. Moreover, due to the reforms to financial regulations made in recent years, it may become difficult to differentiate strategies between us and our competitors, resulting in the intensification of competition in specific businesses.

If we are unable to respond effectively to current or future competition, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected. In addition, intensifying competition and other factors could lead to reorganization within the financial services industry, and this could have an adverse effect on our competitive position or otherwise adversely affect the price of our securities.

Our business could be significantly disrupted due to natural disasters, accidents or other causes.

Our headquarters, branch offices, information technology centers, computer network connections and other facilities are subject to the risk of damage from natural disasters such as earthquakes and typhoons as well as from acts of terrorism and other criminal acts. In addition, our business could be materially disrupted as a result of an epidemic such as new or reemerging influenza infections. Our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected if our recovery efforts, including our implementation of contingency plans that we have developed such as establishingback-up offices, are not effective in preventing significant disruptions to our business operations caused by such natural disasters and criminal acts. Additionally,For example, massive natural disasters such as the March 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake may have various adverse effects, including a deterioration in economic conditions, declines in the business performance of many of our corporate customers and declines in stock prices. As a result, our financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected due to an increase in the amount of problem loans and credit-related costs as well as an increase in unrealized losses on, or losses from sales of, equity securities and financial products.

Negative rumors about us could have an adverse effect on us.

Our business depends on maintaining the trust of depositors and other customers and market participants. Negative rumors about us, spread through media coverage, communications between market participants, Internet postings or otherwise, could lead to our customers and market participants believing factually incorrect information about us and harm our reputation. In the event we are unable to dispel such rumors or otherwise restore our reputation, our business, financial condition, results of operations and the price of our securities could be materially and adversely affected.

Our reputation could be adversely affected if our business operations are perceived as being harmful to the environment and society.

As concerns regarding environmental and social issues such as climate change have heightened in recent years, we believe that our stakeholders as well as the society at large expect that we, as a financial services provider, give increasing consideration to such issues. While we are strengthening our efforts to reduce environmental and social risks, including establishing policies for engaging with sectors that are likely to exacerbate negative impacts on the environment and society, the expectations placed upon us continue to heighten day by day, and our reputation may be harmed if our efforts fall short of such expectations. As a result, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Risks Related to Owning Our Shares

Rights of shareholders under Japanese law may be more limited than under the law of other jurisdictions.

Our articles of incorporation, our regulations of the board of directors and Japan’s Companies Act govern our corporate affairs. Legal principles relating to such matters as the validity of corporate procedures, directors’ and officers’ fiduciary duties and shareholders’ rights may be different from or less clearly defined than those that would apply if we were incorporated in another jurisdiction. For example, under the Companies Act, only

holders of 3% or more of the total voting rights or total outstanding shares are entitled to examine our accounting books and records. Shareholders’ rights under Japanese law may not be as extensive as shareholders’ rights under the law of jurisdictions within the United States or other countries. For more information on the rights of shareholders under Japanese law, see “Item 10.B. Additional Information—Memorandum and Articles of Association.”

It may not be possible for investors to effect service of process within the United States upon us or our directors, executive officers or senior management, or to enforce against us or those persons judgments obtained in U.S. courts predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the federal securities laws of the United States.

We are a joint stock corporation incorporated under the laws of Japan. Almost all of our directors, executive officers and senior management reside outside the United States. Many of the assets of us and these persons are located in Japan and elsewhere outside the United States. It may not be possible, therefore, for U.S. investors to effect service of process within the United States upon us or these persons or to enforce, against us or these persons, judgments obtained in the U.S. courts predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the federal

securities laws of the United States. We believe that there is doubt as to the enforceability in Japan, in original actions or in actions to enforce judgments of U.S. courts, of claims predicated solely upon the federal securities laws of the United States.

Risks Related to Owning Our ADSs

As a holder of ADSs, you have fewer rights than a shareholder and you must act through the depositary to exercise these rights.

The rights of our shareholders under Japanese law to take actions such as voting their shares, receiving dividends and distributions, bringing derivative actions, examining our accounting books and records and exercising appraisal rights are available only to shareholders of record. Because the depositary, through its custodian, is the record holder of the shares underlying the ADSs, a holder of ADSs may not be entitled to the same rights as a shareholder. In your capacity as an ADS holder, you are not able to bring a derivative action, examine our accounting books and records or exercise appraisal rights, except through the depositary.

Foreign exchange rate fluctuations may affect the U.S. dollar value of our ADSs and dividends payable to holders of our ADSs.

Market prices for our ADSs may fall if the value of the yen declines against the U.S. dollar. In addition, theU.S.the U.S. dollar amount of cash dividends and other cash payments made to holders of our ADSs would be reduced iftheif the value of the yen declines against the U.S. dollar.

ITEM 4.INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY

ITEM 4.    INFORMATION OF THE COMPANY

4.A. History and Development of the Company

The Mizuho Group

The Mizuho group was created on September 29, 2000 through the establishment of Mizuho Holdings, Inc. as a holding company of our three predecessor banks, TheDai-Ichi Kangyo Bank, The Fuji Bank and The Industrial Bank of Japan. On October 1, 2000, the respective securities subsidiaries of the predecessor banks merged to form Mizuho Securities Co., Ltd., and the respective trust bank subsidiaries merged on the same date to form Mizuho Trust & Banking.

A further major step in the Mizuho group’s development occurred in April 2002 when the operations of our three predecessor banks were realigned through a corporate split and merger process under Japanese law into a wholesale banking subsidiary, the former Mizuho Corporate Bank, and a banking subsidiary serving primarily retail and small andmedium-sized enterprise customers, the former Mizuho Bank. As an additional step for realigning the group structure, Mizuho Financial Group was established on January 8, 2003 as a corporation organized under the laws of Japan, and on March 12, 2003, it became the holding company for the Mizuho group through astock-for-stock exchange with Mizuho Holdings, which became an intermediate holding company focused on management of the Mizuho group’s banking and securities businesses. The legal and commercial name of the company is Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.

In May 2003, we initiated a project to promote early corporate revitalization of customers in need of revitalization or restructuring and to separate the oversight of restructuring borrowers from the normal credit origination function. In July 2003, our three principal banking subsidiaries, the former Mizuho Corporate Bank, the former Mizuho Bank and Mizuho Trust & Banking each transferred loans, equity securities and other claims outstanding relating to approximately 950 companies to new subsidiaries that they formed. In October 2005, based on the significant reduction in the balance of impaired loans held by these new subsidiaries, which we call the “revitalization subsidiaries,” we deemed the corporate revitalization project to be complete, and each of the revitalization subsidiaries was merged into its respective banking subsidiary parent.

In the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006, we realigned our entire business operations into a Global Corporate Group, Global Retail Group and Global Asset and Wealth Management Group. In October 2005, in connection with this realignment, we established Mizuho Private Wealth Management Co., Ltd., a private banking subsidiary, and converted Mizuho Holdings on October 1, 2005 from an intermediate holding company into Mizuho Financial Strategy Co., Ltd., an advisory company that provides advisory services to financial institutions.

In May 2009, Mizuho Securities and Shinko Securities Co., Ltd. conducted their merger, with the aim of improving our service-providing capabilities to our clients and to offer competitive cutting-edge financial services on a global basis.

In September 2011, Mizuho Trust & Banking became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Mizuho Financial Group, Mizuho Securities became an unlisted subsidiary of the former Mizuho Corporate Bank, and Mizuho Investors Securities became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the former Mizuho Bank, through their respectivestock-for-stock-for-stock stock exchanges. The purpose of thesestock-for-stock exchanges is to further enhance the “group collective capabilities” by integrating group-wide business operations and optimizing management resources such as workforce and branch network.

In January 2013, Mizuho Securities and Mizuho Investors Securities merged in order to provide integrated securities services as the full-line securities company of the Mizuho group. Mizuho Securities aims to further strengthen collaboration among banking, trust banking and securities businesses of the group, expand the company’s customer base to enhance the domestic retail business, and rationalize and streamline management infrastructure.

In April 2013, we turned Mizuho Securities, a consolidated subsidiary of Mizuho Financial Group, into a directly-held subsidiary of Mizuho Financial Group, whereby we moved to a new group capital structure, placing banking, trust banking, securities and other major group companies under the direct control of the holding company.

In July 2013, the former Mizuho Bank and the former Mizuho Corporate Bank merged, and the former Mizuho Corporate Bank, the surviving company, changed its trade name to Mizuho Bank, Ltd. The purpose of the merger iswas to become able to provide directly and promptly diverse and functional financial services to both the former Mizuho Bank and the former Mizuho Corporate Bank customers, utilizing the current “strengths” and “advantages” of the former Mizuho Bank and the former Mizuho Corporate Bank, and to continue to improve customer services by further enhancing group collaboration among the banking, trust banking and securities functions and, at the same time, to realize further enhancement of the consolidation of group-wide business operations and optimization of management resources, such as workforce and branch network, by strengthening group governance and improving group management efficiency.

In July 2016, with consideration of the rule of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve Board”) regarding the operations of foreign banking organizations with U.S. operations, we established a bank holding company, and has itsMizuho Americas LLC, which holds our primary U.S.-based banking, securities and institutional custody services (trust banking) entities together under the holding company,it, with the aim to proactively strengthen corporate governance and expand our profit base through the consistent implementation of our collaborative corporate and investment banking, securities and institutional custody services strategy in the United States in line with the global operation of our new in-house company system.

In December 2017, two subsidiaries of Mizuho Americas LLC, the former Mizuho Bank (USA) and the Mizuho Trust & Banking Co. (USA), merged. The merged entity, Mizuho Bank (USA), provides both banking services and trust services.

In October 2016, with a view to strengthening theour respective asset management businesses, we and TheDai-ichi Life Insurance Company, Limited integrated the asset management functions of both groups, namely, DIAM Co., Ltd., the asset management function of Mizuho Trust & Banking, Mizuho Asset Management Co., Ltd. and Shinko Asset Management Co., Ltd., and formed a new company named Asset Management One Co., Ltd., a consolidated subsidiary of Mizuho Financial Group.

In March 2017, we, Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Holdings, Inc., Resona Bank, Limited as a subsidiary of Resona Holdings, Inc., and TheDai-ichi Life Insurance Company, Limited as a subsidiary ofDai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc., have executed a memorandum of understanding to commence detailed analysis and negotiations in preparation for the management integration of Japan Trustee Services Bank, Ltd. (“JTSB”) and Trust & Custody Services Bank, Ltd,Ltd. (“TCSB”), which was a consolidated subsidiary of Mizuho Financial Group. In March 2018, TCSB executed a management integration agreement with JTSB to carry out the management integration through incorporation of a holding company by joint share transfer. In October 2018, TCSB and JTSB incorporated JTC Holdings, Ltd. (“JTC Holdings”) by joint share transfer. After the joint share transfer, TCSB and JTSB became wholly-owned subsidiaries of JTC Holdings, and JTC Holdings, TCSB and JTSB became equity-method affiliates of Mizuho Financial Group. The purposespurpose of the integration areis to seek economies of scale,contribute to realizefurther growth in the domestic securities settlement market and domestic investment chain by realizing more stable and higher quality operations and to contribute to further growthstrengthening its system development capabilities by seeking the benefits of the domestic securities settlement market and to the enhancement of the domestic investment chain by concentrating both companies’ managerial resources and expertise.scale.

Other Information

Our registered address is1-5-5, Otemachi,Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo100-8176, Japan, and our telephone number is81-3-5224-1111.

The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at www.sec.gov. As a foreign private issuer,

we are exempt from the rules under the Exchange Act that prescribe the furnishing and content of proxy statements to shareholders. Our corporate website is www.mizuho-fg.co.jp/index.html.

4.B. Business Overview

General

We engage in banking, trust banking, securities and other businesses related to financial services.

We launchedpromoted our three-year medium-term business plan, theentitled “Progressive Development of “One MIZUHO”Mizuho”—The Path to a Financial Services Consulting Group,” formulated for the three years beginningfrom the

fiscal year ended March 31, 2017. The two foundations of this plan are: the reinforcement of the “customer-focused” perspective that we promotedIn order to address three material issues in the previous medium-term business plan; and the pursuit of “operational excellence” as part of our effort to promote greater business improvement and efficiency. The plan aims to further develop the “One MIZUHO” strategy by establishing a new business model as a “financial services consulting group.”

We are positioning our asset management function and our research and consulting functions as new pillars that supplement the banking, trust and securities functions, and by striving to provide the best possible and optimal services to customers for their improved satisfaction, we aim to become an indispensable partner for achieving sustainable growth of corporate customers and securing a promising future of retail customers.

With the aim of establishing this new business model, we have set forth five basic policies in the medium-term business plan. The five basic policies are supported by ten basic strategies, which are classified into business strategies, financial strategies and management foundations.

Our Objectives Under the Medium-Term Business Plan

By establishing a customer-focused business platform, we will form deeper relationships with our customers via our financial intermediary functions and our ability to take highly measured risks and build a future in economies and communities as a trusted financial partner in providing solutions for our customers. In the interest of building this new business model, we have established the following objectives in the medium-term business plan.

A Financial Services Consulting Group—The most trusted partner in solving problems and supporting the sustainable growth of customers and communities

Five Basic Policies

Introduction of thein-house company system

Selecting and focusing on certain areas of business

Establishment of a resilient financial base

Proactive involvement in financial innovation

Embedding a corporate culture that encourages the active participation of our workforce to support a stronger Mizuho

Ten Basic Strategies

Business strategies

Strengthening ournon-interest business model on a global basis

Responding to the shift from savings to investment

Strengthening our research and consulting functions

Responding to FinTech

Promoting the “Area One MIZUHO” strategy (i.e., the implementation of the One MIZUHO strategy in each geographical area through collaboration of banking, trust and securities functions, under which the business offices independently design and implement their respective strategies)

Financial strategies

Controlling the balance sheet and reforming the cost structure

Disposing of cross-shareholdings

Management foundations

Completing implementation of the next generation IT systems

Fundamental reforms of HR management

Continued initiatives towards embedding a corporate culture to support the creation of a stronger organization

In the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017,2019, the firstfinal year of the plan, specifically (1) commencement and implementation of fundamental structural reforms, (2) accomplishment of the medium-term business plan and (3) the migration to our next-generation IT system, our group-wide management policy was to progressively develop the One Mizuho strategy by implementing changes to the structure and foundations of our business, further integrating the “customer first” principle into everything we do, and fundamentally increasing productivity.

First, with respect to the commencement and implementation of fundamental structural reforms, in order to strengthen our earning capabilities, we undertook various efforts, including expanding the scope of risk-taking, focusing on areas with growth potential and accelerating the credit review process through a revision of our credit assessment framework. In addition, we endeavored to streamline the number of personnel to align with our business strategy, shift some Head Office personnel to the frontlines and restructure our customer channels by combining branches with respect to banking, trust banking and securities.

Secondly, with respect to the accomplishment of the medium-term business plan, we adopted “strengthening the foundationsteadily carried out our initiatives, including strengthening our model for ensuring a sustainable competitive advantage” as our operational policy and worked together as a group in this direction.

First, we introduced anin-house company system to reinforce the “customer-focused” perspective. The system enhances our capability to provide financial services that closely match customer needs with increased strength and speed, by developing consistent strategies tailored to each customer segment from the formulation of strategies to their execution.

Moreover, we established Asset Management One Co., Ltd., into which our group’s asset management functions have been integrated. We also established the Research & Consulting Unit, into which our group’s research and consulting functions have been consolidated, and thereby enhanced our consulting functionnoninterest income business on a group-wide basis.global basis and disposing of cross-shareholdings. With respect to financial targets, we achieved the target levels we had set regarding our consolidated Common Equity Tier 1 capital (CET1) ratio and disposing of cross-shareholdings (based on the amount consented to by relevant issuers); however, we were unable to achieve our targets regarding our consolidated ROE, RORA and group expense ratio, partly due to the recording of losses in light of structural reforms, as described below, and other influences.

Thirdly, we worked on the migration to our next-generation IT system as one of our top management priorities and have successfully completed the eight migration steps that were scheduled to be implemented in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019.

In addition to the above-mentioned initiatives, we have reinforced our customer-firstproceeded with initiatives such as the creation of new business management by establishing a specialized organization dedicated to promoting the conceptopportunities and expansion of fiduciary duties and holding an advisory committee meeting to which external scholars and experts were invited. Moreover, we adopted the Principles for Customer-Oriented Business Conduct, which was published on March 30, 2017 by Japan’s Financial Services Agency, on the same date.

Secondly, with respect to “operational excellence,” we have streamlined head office operations and improved our products and services in order to increase productivity. At the same time, we have advanced our efforts to consolidate overlapping operations and improve business processessolution domains through the utilization of digital technology.

Furthermore, with respect to our efforts to expand new business areas and enhance and streamline operations and services through the utilizationuse of digital technology such as artificial intelligence and big data, we have steadily proceededopen collaboration with demonstration experiments, technical verifications andpre-marketing studies, while actively collaborating withthird parties, including those in other companies through open innovation (an approach to creating innovative services and businesses by not relying exclusively on internal resources but also bringing in external technologies and ideas).industries.

With respect to the corporate governance system, Mizuho Financial Group, as a Company with Three Committees, has established a system that will be able to sufficiently fulfill its obligations to its shareholders. We have continued the effort to improve the productivity and efficiency of discussions, enhance the use of outside directors’ knowledge and reflect such knowledge in the performance of duties, in order to further improve the effectiveness of the Board of Directors.

In addition,Fourthly, in an effort to further enhance risk governance, we developed an autonomous control structure under which the first line, which is responsible for the execution of business operations, itself takes on risk

management and compliance as an integral part of business operations, in accordance with the “Three Lines of Defense” concept set forth in the “Corporate governance principles for banks,” published by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision.

With respect to legal compliance, in conjunction with further enhancing our framework for the severance of transactions with anti-social elements, we have intensified various efforts, including countermeasures against money laundering and terrorist financing.

At the same time, in order to contribute to the sustainable development of society and to create new corporate value, we have pursuedaddressed environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues. With respect to the environment and society, we established Policies on Specific Industrial Sectors, which set forth our policies in response to clients in certain industries where there is a CSR initiative addressing social, environmentalhigh possibility that our involvement with the client would contribute to an adverse impact on the environment and society. With respect to governance, we revised our executive compensation system, raised the proportion of stock compensation for executives responsible for business execution and implemented other related measures.

Finally, with respect to legal compliance, we continued working on a variety of efforts, such as preventing transactions with individuals or organizations associated with organized crime and taking countermeasures against money laundering and terrorism financing, including our response to the fourth mutual evaluation of Japan by the Financial Action Task Force, an inter-governmental body that promotes measures for combating money laundering and terrorist financing.

Recording of Losses in Light of Structural Reforms

In our financial results for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019 under Japanese GAAP, we recorded losses totaling ¥695.4 billion in connection with carrying out our structural reforms. Based on our view that the business environment will continue to be challenging for the foreseeable future, we aim to implement feasible measures at an early stage, accelerate the elimination of structural issues, and further solidify our stable profit base.

Our customers’ needs and the financial industry are rapidly undergoing structural changes in reflection of the structural shifts occurring in the economy, industry and society such as digitalization, an aging society with low birthrates and globalization. It is essential that we respond quickly to these structural changes, especially in light of increasing uncertainty in the business environment due to concerns regarding a global economic slowdown, signs of a turn in the credit cycle and other global issues. We have also continued to offer our combined group strength to assist in reviving the industries and economies of regions affected by the Great East Japan Earthquake of 2011 and the Kumamoto Earthquake of 2016.factors.

As the second yearIn consideration of the medium-term business plan,above environment and issues, we positionlaunched the5-Year Business Plan: Transitioning to the Next Generation of Financial Services for the five-year period beginning the fiscal year ending March 31, 20182020. Our new business plan is focused on transitioning to the next generation of financial services—forging new forms of partnerships with our customers so that we can respond to their needs as the yeartimes change.

Our objective is to build a stronger and more resilient financial group that our customers can depend on in which the coming era.

Outline of the New Business Plan

Basic policy

By implementing forward-looking structural reforms focused on three interconnected areas—business structure, finance structure and corporate foundations—we will endeavor to realize our objectiveresolve the mismatch that has arisen in the allocation of becoming a “financial services consulting group” based oncorporate resources such as branch offices and human resources and respond to new customer needs in order to transition to the management policynext generation of accelerating the One MIZUHO strategy through the further enhancementfinancial services.

The five-year period of a customer-first business approach and fundamentally improved productivity.

We will work to advance the business plan based oncan be broadly divided into two phases: Phase 1 (three years beginning the five basic policies set outfiscal year ending March 31, 2020) in the medium-term business plan by placing emphasis on the points described below.

Enhance Operation of theIn-House Company System

We will work to enhance the operation of thein-house company system to promote our customer-first business approach and achieve the further integration of group-wide operation across banking, trust, securities and other business areas. We will further enhance our front-line capabilities, accelerate decision making, streamline group management, and work to strengthennon-interest businesses on a group-wide basis.

Selecting and Focusing on Certain Areas of Business

We will reallocate resources from thelow-priority areas to the high-priority areas as identified based on our strategic focus. We will thereby make efficient usewhich full implementation of the limited resources to help enhance our earnings capacity.

Establishment of a Resilient Financial Base

We will strengthen balance sheet control by optimizing risk and return, managing risk-weighted assets and controlling liquidity proactively and flexibly based on our understanding of future external changes. We will pursue operational excellence and thoroughly address issues faced bystructural reforms, building the front-lines or found in existing work procedures to improve productivity and cost structure.

Proactive Involvement in Innovation

Our Chief Digital Innovation Officer (CDIO) is in charge of promoting digital innovation acrossfirm foundations for the group. Under this structure, we will accelerate our efforts in taking initiatives in digital technology, such as artificial intelligence and big data, and will endeavor to create next generation businessesfinancial services, will be conducted; and improve business processes.

Embedding a Corporate Culture That Encouragesphase 2 (two years beginning the Active Participation of the Workforce to Support a Stronger Mizuho

We will continuously strive to improve our human resource management systems and to establish a corporate culture that encourages all employees to take initiative.

Major reforms in our human resource management aim to continuously increase employee engagement, creating a virtuous cycle of growth between employees and the organization, and to establish a competitive advantage for us in terms of workforce. We will encourage the active participation of employees by promoting the “Health and Productivity Management” initiative so that every employee can exercise their potential abilities and continue to actively contribute to the group. We will further promote our “work-life balance” initiative to provide flexible and diverse work arrangements.

To establish a corporate culture that encourages all employees to take initiatives, we will continue to enhance various initiatives such as encouraging each office to set their own goals and work toward achieving them.

Completing Implementation of the Next Generation IT Systems

As the most important and largest systems project of ours, we will take measures to complete the next-generation IT systems in a safe and steady manner.

Signing of Memorandum of Understanding for the Integration of Trust Banks Specializing in Asset Administration Services

As announced infiscal year ending March 2017, Mizuho Financial Group, Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Holdings, Inc.31, 2023), Resona Bank, Limited and The Dai-ichi Life Insurance Company, Limited have signed a memorandum of understanding to commence detailed analysis and negotiations in preparation for the management integration of Trust & Custody Services Bank, Ltd. (a consolidated subsidiary of ours) and Japan Trustee Services Bank, Ltd. The integration is aimed at (i) leveraging the benefits of scale through the concentration of both companies’ managerial resources and expertise related to asset custody services, (ii) improving the stability and quality of operations, and (iii) contributing to the further growth of securities settlement market and investment chain in Japan. The integrated companywhich will aim to becomeachieve the top trust bankeffects of the structural reforms and accelerate further growth.

Key strategy

In order to transition to the next generation of financial services, we will create new value incorporating both financial andnon-financial products and services by going beyond the conventional boundaries of finance in Japan specializingorder to forge new forms of partnerships with our customers.

Forging new forms of partnerships with our customers

For individual customers: be a partner that helps customers design their lives in asset administration servicesa changing society.

For corporate & institutional clients: be a strategic partner for developing businesses during a period of structural changes in industries.

For market participants: be a partner with expert knowledge of market mechanisms and the ability to draw on a range of intermediary functions.

For such purpose, we will draw on the strengths that meetwe have cultivated thus far and accelerate our digitalization initiatives and proactive collaboration with external partners.

Our key strengths

Customer base, network, trustworthiness and dependability

Financial functions, market presence and ability to respond tonon-financial needs

Approach business as a wide variety of customer needs.unified group

We will also continueuphold “Open & Connected” and “Passionate & Professional” as our action principles.

Open & Connected

We will flexibly blend customer segments, regions, functions and other aspects of our business to considercreate new, more open value chains (or the possibilitychain of consolidation betweenvalue added in each process before we deliver a product to a customer) spanning across finance and adjacent fields.

We will proactively collaborate not only within the Mizuho Bankgroup but also with external partners.

Passionate & Professional

Each employee will be encouraged to find a source of inspiration in the dreams and Mizuho Trust & Banking.hopes of our customers and better connect with them.

We will draw on our strengths, backed by our expertise, to anticipate customers’ needs and then think, act and deliver.

Priority business domains

In addition to the foregoing efforts, weBusiness structural reforms

We will also proceed withimplement business structural reforms focused on the following effortsinitiatives to better enable us to respond to structural shifts occurring in the economy, industry and society while drawing on our strengths.

Be a partner that helps customers design their lives in a changing society.

Assist customers with asset building to support their life design in an era of lengthening lifespans, and develop professionals capable of providing this assistance.

Provide sophisticated solutions for business succession needs and assist clients with needs regarding identifying candidates for senior management roles.

Create next-generation branches focused on consulting that combine physical locations and digital channels.

Appeal to new customer demographics and create new demand through the application of technology and open collaboration.

Be a strategic partner for business development under a changing industrial structure.

Open collaboration for growth acceleration, including financing the growth of startups and forming industry-government-academia partnerships.

Utilize our industry knowledge and other insights to build new forms of partnerships that share business risks.

Leveraging our Asian client base and networks in order to support the business development of global clients.

Be a partner with expert knowledge of market mechanisms and the ability to draw on a range of intermediary functions.

By strengthening our global network and products framework, draw on a broad range of intermediary functions to connect investors with other investors and connect issuers with investors.

Enhance the sophistication of our ALM and portfolio management through flexible asset allocation while maintaining a focus on achieving a balance between realized gains and unrealized gains/losses.

Financial structure reforms

We will implement financial structure reforms focused on the following initiatives to transition to a flexible business/earnings structure that can better respond to changes in the business environment such as tightening of regulations.and competitive environments:

Upgrading

Identify business/earnings structure issues in each business domain, focusing on the following four perspectives:

Risk Appetite Frameworkand return (gross profits ROE)

Cost and return (expense ratio)

Growth potential

Stability

Based on the above factors, streamline certain areas andconcentrate/re-allocate corporate resources to growth areas.

After establishing a stable profit base, transition to an earnings structure centered on proactively pursuing earnings streams with upside potential.

Corporate foundations reforms

We have introduced a risk appetite framework, withwill implement the aim of enhancing corporate value through the integrated group-wide operation of business strategies, financial strategies and risk controls. We determine our resource allocation and profit plans in light of the types and the level of risk that we are required to take in realizing our strategy. We monitor operational status and take other necessary measures to balance risk versus return.

We have also established the “Action Guideline for Risk” for the purpose of promoting the values and principles that must be shared in confronting risk and raised the awareness of all officers and employees in this regard through training, etc. We will continuously strive to nurture a sound risk culture through these actions to enhance the effectiveness of our risk appetite framework.

Strengthening of Corporate Governance on a Group Basis

Each of our principal banking subsidiaries and Mizuho Securities changed its corporate governance system from “Company with Board of Company Auditors” structure to “Company with Audit and Supervisory Committee.”

Each of these subsidiaries aims to realize a higher level of supervision by the respective board of directors and swifter decision-making,following initiatives in order to perform its roles more effectively under the group’sin-house company system. We will thereby continue to further enhancestrengthen our corporate governancefoundations as a means of supporting continued competitive advantages:

Transform our approach to new business and our working style.

Focus on athe areas of personnel/workplace, IT systems/digital, sales channels and group basis.companies.

Fulfillment of Fiduciary Duties

We have established policies, as well as action plans for each group company, for fulfilling fiduciary duties with respect to the asset management-related businessRevise our human resources management in order to continue to be the customers’ most trusted financial services group as their long-term partner. In line with such policiesan approach that prioritizes employees’ professional growth and action plans, we will establish appropriate incentive frameworks forcareer preferences and promote a new human resources management strategy focused on maximizing our workforce value in a manner that is universally recognizable.

Strengthen group governance.

Expand the use of“dual-hat” appointments of executive officers between our holding company and group companies and other methods of strengthening unified management of the group, including group companies other than banking, trust banking and securities subsidiaries. This will enhance our ability to implement key strategies and structural reforms.

Cultivate a new corporate culture that encourages all employees and officers to constantly fulfill their fiduciary duties.centered on communication.

Sustainability initiatives

Disposing of Cross-shareholdings

As stated inThrough the “Corporate Governance Report” that we filed withinitiatives under the Tokyo Stock Exchange, as a basic policy, we will not hold listed shares for strategic reasons “unless we consider these holdings to be meaningful.” We will continue to strive to dispose of cross-shareholdings in order to decrease the potential impact on our financial position due to fluctuations in stock prices and to be able to fully perform financial intermediary functions even in periods of stress.

Establishment of Strong Mizuho Brand

We aim to establish a strong brand by positioning the medium-term business plan as the action plan for the establishment of the Mizuho brand and by achieving our goal of becoming a “financial services consulting group.” While being the most trusted partner in solving problems and supporting the sustainable growth of customers and communities, as set out in the medium-termnew business plan, we will continueaim to improvecreate new value for our stakeholders as follows:

For customers: Create new value through finance and surrounding business areas, with an aim to achieve increased customer convenience and business growth.

For shareholders: Increase corporate value by resolving structural issues and accelerating growth.

For employees: Create workplaces that give employees a sense of purpose, linked to customer satisfaction.

Based on the valueabove, we will define sustainability for the Mizuho group as “achieving sustainable and stable growth for the group, and through this growth, contributing to the sustainable development and prosperity of the Mizuho brand through initiatives, including those aimed at realizing effective brand communication.economy, industry and society around the world.” Further, we will select “key sustainability areas” that reflect the expectations and demands of our stakeholders, based on their materiality to and affinity with our strategies, and the medium- to long-term impact on our corporate value. This will form the basis of our efforts to contribute to the realization of the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), the international goals adopted in September 2015 that were set forth in the “2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.”

Management policy for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2020

For the first year of the new business plan, we will implement forward-looking structural reforms ahead of schedule. Unified as a group, we will accelerate the structural reforms, and along with this, we will come together as a group to revise various business operations in order to forge new forms of partnerships with our customers as a starting point for creating value in a wide range of areas.

Group Operations

Group Management Structure

We operate our group through fivein-house companies, which determine and promote strategies group-wide across banking, trust banking, securities and other business areas according to the attributes of customers, and two units that support all of thein-house companies.

Retail & Business Banking Company

The Retail & Business Banking Company is in chargeresponsible for customer segments consisting of the services for individual customers, small- andmedium-sized enterprisesSMEs and middle-market firms.corporations, engages in consulting services that integrate banking, trust banking, securities and other functions within the Mizuho group, as well as providing convenient financial services by leveraging advanced technologies and forming alliances with other companies.

For individual customers, the Retail & Business Banking Company will strive to improve our capacity to provide consulting services, including asset management and asset succession, while working on the development and provision of convenient services by leveraging advanced technologies and forming alliances with other companies and institutions.

While fulfilling our fiduciary duties, to promote the change “from savings to investments”As a reliable partner in an era of lengthening lifespans, we support customers who have concerns about their long term plans, and in addition to the consulting services that combine banking, trust banking and securities functions, we offer our customers asset formation support that utilizes advanced technologies, such asAI-powered asset management advisory services and asset management support utilizing remote channels, etc. Accordingly, in conjunction with the expansion of the scope of personaladdition to strengthening our efforts related to NISA, a tax exemption program for small investments, and iDeCo, an individual-type defined contribution pension plans, called “iDeCo,” based on the amended Fixed Contribution Pension Law,plan, we made efforts to introduce new plans to support customers and towill strengthen financial education through seminars.

Furthermore, to support the smooth asset succession, we provide services such as inheritance distribution service and testamentary-trust that utilize trust function. We have also expanded our line of products and services such as family trustsMultifunctional Safety Trust and annual fund giving trusts.a web based app that can be used to manage inheritance.

With respect to the loan business, we have expanded our line of housing loan and card loan products and offer various products and services in response to each customer’s life stage, including firstly products that meet a diverse range of needs, internet-based services and the development of a new internet-based services.business model that utilizes advanced technology.

We also provide products/services to officers and employees of our corporate clients, such as opening account for payrolls, providing housing loans, management of retirement payments, etc.

In addition, in an effort to increase customer convenience, we have expandedenhanced the efficiency of our branch network throughout Japan (Mizuho Bank: 466;464; Mizuho Trust & Banking: 57;60; Mizuho Securities: 273;259; each as of March 31, 2017)2019) and our ATM network (approximately 6,9007,200 locations as of March 31, 2017,2019, including ATMs shared with AEON Bank). We also have 165150 of Mizuho Securities “Planet Booths,” which are located in the branches and offices of Mizuho Bank, and 2023 of Mizuho Trust & Banking “Trust Lounges,” which are located in the branches and offices of Mizuho Bank, as of March 31, 2017.2019.

Moreover, with the aim of constructing a convenient and efficient channel network that responds to changes in customer needs, we are promoting the next generation of branches and offices which serve as consulting spaces along with a reduction of the number of branches and offices through reorganization and consolidation.

We have also made efforts to enhance customer convenience by offeringconvenience. For example, we are engaging in collaboration with other companies and are utilizing advanced technologies to offer new financial and other services that utilize advanced scientific and digital technologies, as well as by enhancingto enhance the quality of our internet and smart phone services.services, in light of changing customer needs due to ongoing digitalization.

In the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019, we strengthened our efforts in new business areas, including the launch of a new affiliate, J.Score CO., LTD, the commencement of discussions into joint establishment of a new bank with LINE Corporation, and the launch ofJ-Coin Pay, a smartphone-based payment service, in cooperation with approximately 60 other financial institutions.

Further, we undertake the business related to lottery tickets, such as the sales of lottery tickets issued by prefectures and ordinance-designated cities.

For small- andmedium-sized enterprises and middle-market firms, the Retail & Business Banking Company provides solutions with respect to both types of needs: management issues such as business development, and personal issues of customers who are business owners, such as asset inheritance and management, etc.

Starting from consulting services,In response to increasing customer needs related to their growth strategy or business succession in an unclear business environment, we offer multi-layered solutions in response to the various development stages of our customers’ businesses through the combined strength of our banking, trust banking, securities, asset management and research and consulting functions, based on a customer-focused approach.

Specifically, we offer syndicated loans, advisory services related to overseas expansions, mergers and acquisitions-related services, and business matching services, depending on the customers’ business strategies, in addition to brokering financial products and expanding the customer base for trustee business for defined contribution pension plans, combining traditional financial services and advanced advisory services.

Furthermore, due to the aging of Japanese business owners, business succession and asset inheritance has become a matter of urgency. Using our succession and propertyknow-how, we actively offer positive solutions for optimal and smooth business succession and asset inheritance, including the inheritance of business ownership and corporate stock as well as corporate reorganization, addressing both individual and corporate needs.

Moreover, we leverage our existing customer base to support the growth of innovative companies that show future promise by means of finance and other solutions.

In light of structural changes in customer needs against the backdrop of further progress in digitalization, an aging society with a low birthrate and other factors, we will enhanced the efficiency of sales channels, including physical storefronts, and expand new business areas to realize the wants and desires of individual customers as well as the sustainable growth of corporate customers.

In order to achieve this manner,goal, we aimwill take advantage of our broad customer base, trustworthiness and dependability, as well as our consulting capabilities. At the same time, we will collaborate openly with those both

inside and outside the Mizuho group to grow with our customers intoprovide new value incorporating both financial andnon-financial products and services, as a “financial services consulting company.”partner for individual customers’ life design and corporate customers’ growth strategies and business succession.

Corporate & Institutional Company

The Corporate & Institutional Company engages in relationship managementis responsible for our customers that arecustomer segments consisting of large corporations, financial institutions and public sector businessespublic-sector entities in Japan.Japan, provides custom-designed solutions for each client on a group-wide basis to meet their capital raising, asset management and business/financial strategy related needs.

For large corporate customers, based on our solid customer relationships and utilizing our global industry knowledge, we offer group-wide financial solutions that are tailored for each customer, such as syndicate loans,fund management, underwriting of equity and bonds, and M&A advisory and risk hedging products, etc., on a global basis to meet their needs in fund-raising, investment, management and financial strategies. In March 2019, in consideration of increasing customer needs for a diverse range of financial solutions, we made IBJ Leasing Company, Limited (which plans to change its trade name to Mizuho Leasing Company, Limited in October 2019) our equity method affiliate and increased our ability to offer solutions.

Mizuho Bank and Mizuho Securities have introduced thedual-hat structure in several offices in Japan. They collaborate toThrough the global inter-sectoral group collaboration, they provide our customers with solutions based on their capital management, business strategy and financial strategy on a global basis.

Mizuho Bank and Mizuho Trust & Banking together provide solutions related to real estate, where we have a leading track record in the industry in Japan. They also work together in the areas of pension, asset securitization, securities management, stock transfer agent, consulting, etc., in response to our customers’ diversified needs for investment and asset optimization.

We are also strengthening business structures across the group by increasing personnel and reframing the business structure of Mizuho Securities, as well as strengthening the consulting functions of Mizuho Trust & Banking.

Further, we are proactively providing risk money to renewable energy companies and startups to develop next-generation industries and growth industries.companies and promote collaboration among companies over their business areas.

For financial institutions, we offer advisory services and solutions, such as advice on financial strategy and proposals on various investment products, by concentrating our various financial expertise from each group company to meet the increasingly sophisticated and diversified needs of customers.

For public sector customers, as a leading bank with a wealth of experience and a solid track record, we provide optimal financial services group-wide that include funding support as a trustee and underwriter of public bonds and services as a designated financial institution. In addition, in the field of revitalizing rural regions in Japan, an important matter to the Japanese economy, we engage in Public Private Partnerships/Private Finance Initiatives (PPP and PFI) projects in collaboration with regional financial institutions, national and regional government entities and their affiliates.

Through these endeavors, we aimWe will build new relationships with customers and endeavor to berealize valueco-creation andco-prosperity based on changes in customer needs in response to changes in social and industrial structures.

In order to achieve this goal, as a strategic partner for our customers’ most trusted partner.business development, we will utilize our sophisticated industry knowledge and competency to create business opportunities for our customers and to demonstrate our ability to draw on a broad range of intermediary functions in the sharing of business risks, with an open mindset.

Global Corporate Company

The Global Corporate Company works withnon-Japanese companies andis responsible for customer segments consisting of both Japanese companies operating outside Japan.Japan andnon-Japanese companies, provides various solutions by taking advantage of our deep understanding of our clients’ businesses and our strengths in corporate finance and transaction banking, such as lending and corporate bond underwriting.

For our Japanese corporate customers, we provide unifiedintegrated support both in and outside Japan to help them expand their overseas operations. We offer highly specialized services that use our advanced financial technologies and expertise. Particularly in the Asia, region, we support Japanese corporate customers developing new markets by offering advisory and other services.

We are also expanding business withnon-Japanese corporate customers, includingcustomers. We use our global network to support U.S. and European global companies developing business in Asia as well as Asian multinational enterprises expanding within Asia, through our global network. With respect toAsia. For ournon-Japanese corporate customers, we are proceeding with our strategy ofpursuing the Global 300 Strategy, which involves focusing on a group of approximately 300 blue-chip customers.companies around the world. Taking the characteristics of each industry sector into consideration, we take a focused approach based on ourknow-how and knowledge ofinsight on the business and financial perspectives, and throughaspects. Through a close relationship with top management, we aim to constructdevelop long-term relationships with customers and achieve sustained growth together with them.our customers. Our market presence within the United States continues to grow, including in the area of investment-grade corporate debt underwriting, based on our sector-based approach and the enhanced sophistication in the collaboration between our banking and securities functions.

Meanwhile, we are enhancing our support to clients by expanding our overseasglobal office network and strengthening the framework to support our customers’ business support framework for our customers outside Japan. We have recently opened the Mizuho Bank Mexico in Mexico(China), Ltd. Shanghai HongqiaoSub-Branch and the Phnom Penh Branch in Cambodia.Mizuho Securities Europe GmbH.

We are also workingforming business alliances with government-affiliated institutions and financial institutions of various countries, forming business alliances as necessary, to provideup-to-date local information and other entry support to our customers interested in starting business in new markets.customers. We are also enhancing our service framework to address the diverse business needs of customers, who also needincluding post-entry support.

As we see major changes in the global economy and the regulatory framework, we aim to achieve sustainable growth by improvingWe will adjust our business portfolio promoting cross-sellingin anticipation of future growth constraints, such as future regulatory changes and strengtheningour foreign currency funding capabilities. At the same time, we will collaborate with customers in their development of global businesses to strengthen cross-regional business value chains. In order to achieve this goal, as a strategic partner that supports the development of businesses globally, we will link customers and our business functions located in Asia with those in other regions, based on our network in the rapidly growing Asian economies and management base.our presence in the fertile U.S. capital markets.

Global Markets Company

In addition to asset liability management and investment business with respect to bonds and equities, theThe Global Markets Company providesis responsible for market-related businesses, engages in sales and trading business to meet the risk hedging and investment needs ofservices for a wide range of customers, from individuals to institutional investors, by offering market products to meet their risk hedging and asset management needs through collaboration between the Mizuho group’s banking, trust banking and securities functions, as well as investments in equity, fixed income and others.

To become a comprehensive range of market-related products.top-class Asian player in the global markets, our basic strategy is to enhance our presence in the market so that we can develop the most suitable products and organizational structure based on arising customer needs.

With respect to the sales and trading business, through a management structure based on customer segments, we offer detailed products and services based on our sophisticated knowledge, experience and expertise to meet the diverse needs of our customers and support their global business by integrating our banking, trust banking and securities functions as well as our broad customer base, network and utilizing our global network.presence in the financial market.

Specifically, we are strengthening our contact with customers at branches for our customers that are small andmedium-sized enterprises and middle market firms, and we are providing ideas that reflect market perspectives for transactions involving large corporations and financial institutions. For investors such as hedge funds and asset managers, we use our comprehensive strength in the banking and securities to provide products that meet our customers’ needs.

With respect to our asset liability management, we contribute to balance sheet management through the stabilization of domestic currency and foreign currency liquidity management. Also, as for the investment business, we earn stable revenue by constructing a diversified portfolio in interest rates, equity and credit markets, and appropriate asset allocation with using our early warning control to reflect the changes of market environment flexibly. In the previous fiscal year we started the implementation of initiatives for taking risks, and we continue to implement management focusing on achieving an appropriate balance between realized gains and unrealized gains/losses by restructuring stable earning sources with risk-taking capabilities.

In addition, with respect to asset liability management and investment business, we combineare also actively working on the advancement of our early warning control and diversified investmentsdecision making through digitalization by the use of advanced technology such as AI.

We aim to manage market fluctuations so that our portfolio is more sound and stable.

The Global Markets Company is aiming to becomerealize atop-class Asian player stable earnings structure in the globalinvestment business and to improve sales and trading services with clearly defined focus areas which enable us to draw on diverse intermediary functions through the market by utilizing its capacityand create diverse value for our customers.

In order to offerachieve this goal, as a wide rangepartner with expert knowledge of products based onmarket mechanisms that has insight into markets, we will enhance our asset allocation and product lineup and aim to establish a stable profit base. At the collaboration among the banking, trust and securities functions.same time, we will provide appropriate investment opportunities to investors with different risk appetite.

Asset Management Company

The Asset Management Company works withis responsible for businesses related to asset management, provides products and services that meet the asset management needs of our wide range of customers, from individuals to institutional investors, through the collaboration between the group’s banking, trust banking and securities functions as well as Asset Management One one of the largest asset management companies in Japan and Asia, to meet the needs of a wide range of customers, from individuals to institutional investors, by providing products and services while fulfilling its fiduciary duties.Co., Ltd.

For individual customers, we offer investment products tothat contribute to their medium- to long-term asset formation.

For institutional investors such as pension funds, we offer consulting functionsservices to meet their diversified and sophisticated asset management needs.

We offer our customers investment products that are mostbest suited to them throughin collaboration with Mizuho Alternative Investments, LLC, our New York-based hedge fund manager, Mizuho GlobalAsset Management One Alternative Investments, Ltd., our Tokyo-based financial gatekeeper, Eurekahedge Pte, LTD., our Singapore-based hedge fund database provider, and researcher, and Matthews Asia, an independent, privately owned firm and the largest dedicated Asia investment specialist in the U.S.

In addition, in various product fields, we develop global financialare focusing on developing and offering products by collaboratingthrough collaboration with BlackRock, Inc. and arrange and offer products related to private equity and infrastructure funds by collaborating with Partner Group AG.

The Asset Management Company aimsWe will continue to transform our business structure to achieve the high capital efficiency that is inherent to the asset management business, and at the same time, support customers’medium-to long-term asset formation, and thereby contribute to the revitalization of domestic financial assetsassets.

In order to achieve this goal, we will enhance ourvalue-add capabilities relating to asset management by strengthening our investing and solution-providing capabilities, and we will respond to changing customer needs

in a unified group manner. At the same time, we will pursue efficiency and progressiveness through the foregoing approaches.innovation and business process reformation.

Global Products Unit

The Global Products Unit cooperates with eachengages in the provision of a wide range of solutions, including M&A, real estate, project finance, domestic and foreign settlement services, asset management and stock transfer agency, as thein-house companies in unit responsible for providing solutions to a wide range of customer segments, including individual customers, such as advice on businesscorporate clients and financial strategies, financing support, domesticinvestors, in the areas of investment banking and foreign exchange and settlement, by making full use of its expertise.transaction banking.

In the investment banking business we provide sophisticated financial solutions mainly in the business areas of mergers and acquisitions, real estate, asset finance, project finance and corporate finance.as follows:

In the mergers and acquisitions business, with an aim to increase the corporate value of our customers, we offer sophisticated solutions in response to our customers’ needs, mainly in the areas of cross-border mergers and acquisitions, business succession and management buyouts.

In the real estate business, by taking full advantage of our extensive knowledge and skills developed through the various deals we have arranged over the years and in collaboration withof our group companies, we offer various real estate-backed financing methods and real estate-related investment strategies.strategy support.

In the asset finance business, by strengthening the collaboration between banking, trust banking and securities functions and by arranging customers’ asset securitization, we satisfy their demands such as diversification of fund-raising sources and improvement of financial indices achieved by removing assets from their balance sheet.

In the project finance business, we provide various financial products and services such asinternationally, including long-term loan facilities for large-scale mining power generation,and public infrastructure development, and domestically, including loans for renewable energy-related projects and arrangement of PFI/PPP deals for financing transportation and other types of public infrastructure.deals. In addition, we offer investment opportunities to institutional investors through our managed infrastructure debt funds.

In the corporate finance business, we proactively provide a wide variety of fund raising solutions in the syndicated loan market,and debt capital markets and equity capital markets.

In the transaction business we provide various solutions related to domestic exchange settlement, foreign exchange, cash management, trade finance, yen correspondence settlementin accordance with customer needs and yen securities custody, global custody, asset management and stock transfer agent services.the character of their business:

For our corporate customers in the transaction business, we offer various financial services and products such as online banking, cash management solutions, Renminbi-denominated services and trade finance on a global basis.

For financial institutions and institutional investors, we promote custody, global custody and yen correspondence settlement, asset management and stock transfer agent services.

In addition, we are further expanding our range of services in collaboration with our group companies and leveraging the latest technological innovations.

The Global Products Unit aimsIn the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019, Trust & Custody Services Bank, Ltd. incorporated JTC Holdings, Ltd. by implementing a joint share transfer with Japan Trustee Services Bank, Ltd. for the purpose of realizing more stable and higher quality operations by seeking economies of scale.

As uncertainty grows in the operating environment that our customers and society confront today, we will align ourselves with our customers’ changing needs and will provide helpful solutions based on our high level of expertise and knowledge.

In addition, we will support eachin-house company’s pursuit of its strategies and contribute to supportincreasing the group’s stable earnings capability by calibrating the allocation of corporate resources for each product and by effectively creating value chains on a group-wide goal of becoming a “financial services consulting group” by building a solid products platform.basis.

Research & Consulting Unit

The Research & Consulting Unit asoffers a wide variety of solutions that combine the fifth pillar for achieving the aim of themid- termfollowing:

research functions that provide deep analysis, spanning from industrial to macroeconomic analysis;

consulting functions that cover many fields, including business plan, to become a “financial services consulting group,” launched “One Think Tank” in April 2016, which combines our research with consulting functions.strategy; and

IT and digital technology insights.

In the research field, we conduct deep investigations and wide-ranging analyses widely ranging from macro-economics to industry and business trends, and we also offer public policy advice based on such investigationslink research and analyses.business origination function.

In the consulting field, we also offer a wide range of functions to help solve various issues that companies face, including those regarding management/financialHR planning/IT strategy business/assetand business succession, and IT systems, as well as the social issues ofwithin the public sector, including the environment, energy, infrastructure and health care.care by utilizing financial engineering and digital knowledge.

ResearchIn a rapidly changing economic and consulting functions ofsocial environment, including an aging society with a low birthrate, digitalization and globalization, we will aim to further contribute to creating new value for our customers and society by utilizing our expertise, including industry expertise that can better respond to structural shifts in the unit endeavor to meet the rising expectationsneeds of our customers, as uncertainties arise amidand by creating value chains on a group-wide basis.

In order to realize new value creation, we will work to increase the global economy, the financial marketssophistication of our research functions, enhance our consulting business, leverage IT and the social environment. To meet further client needs, we focus on the following four points:

1) “ to Advance Utility Functions” through collaboration among ourin-house companiesdigital technology and to address increasingly complicated business issues for clientsother challenges.

2) “ to Enhance ‘One Think Tank’ brand value” through proactively promoting our advancedknowledge/know-how.

3) “ to Advance Global Solutions to our clients” in the midst of rising uncertainty in the global business environment.

4) “ to Promote theMarket-in Approach” from the viewpoint of “Client first.”

In addition to the points above, we aim to be the best team of experts, the “No. 1 Think Tank” in Japan, by leveraging digital technologies to offer useful solutions based on our leading-edge and experienced knowledge/know-how regarding wide-ranging business issues in order to support our clients’ growth.

Competition

We engage in banking, trust banking, securities and other businesses related to financial services and face strong competition in all of those areas of businesses partly due to deregulation of the Japanese financial industry.businesses.

Our major competitors in Japan include:

 

Japan’s other major banking groups: Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group and Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group.

 

Other banking institutions: These include city banks, trust banks, regional banks, shinkin banks (or credit associations), credit cooperatives, agricultural cooperatives, foreign banks and retail-oriented online banks.

 

Securities companies and investment banks: These include both domestic securities companies and the Japanese affiliates of global investment banks.

Government financial institutions: These include Japan Finance Corporation, Japan Post Bank, Development Bank of Japan and Japan Bank for International Cooperation.

 

Non-bank finance companies: These include credit card issuers, installment shopping credit companies, leasing companies and othernon-bank finance companies.

 

Asset management companies.

 

Other financial services providers: We also compete with financial services providers that utilize “FinTech.”

In global markets, we face competition with other commercial banks and other financial institutions, particularly major global banks and the leading local banks in those financial markets outside Japan in which we conduct business.

Japanese Banking and Securities Industry

Private banking institutions in Japan are normally classified into two categories (the following numbers are based on information published by the Financial Services Agency, available as of June 27, 2017)April 28, 2019): (i) ordinary banks, of which there were 124,123, not including foreign commercial banks with banking operations in Japan; and (ii) trust banks, of which there were 16,14, including Japanese subsidiaries of foreign financial institutions and subsidiaries of Japanese financial institutions.

Ordinary banks consist mainly of city banks and regional banks. City banks, including Mizuho Bank, are based in large cities, operate domestically on a nation-wide scale through networks of branch offices and have strong links with large corporate customers in Japan. In light of deregulation and other competitive factors, however, many of these banks have placed increasing emphasis on other markets, including retail banking, small and medium-sized enterprise banking, international operations and investment banking. Regional banks are mostly based in one of the prefectures of Japan and are generally much smaller in terms of total assets than city banks. In recent years, as a consequence of changes in the business environment, the number of regional banks that integrate their businesses with other regional banks ishas been increasing. Customers of regional banks, other than local retail customers, include mostly regional enterprises and local public utilities, although regional banks also lend to large corporations. In addition to these types of banks, new retail-oriented banks have emerged in recent years, including Internet banks and banks specializing in placing their ATMs in convenience stores and supermarkets without maintaining a branch network.

Trust banks, including Mizuho Trust & Banking, are engaged in trust services in relation to, among others, money trust, pension trust and real estate trust services, in addition to banking business.

Based on information published by the Financial Services Agency, available as of June 27, 2017,April 28, 2019, there were 5356 foreign banks operating banking businesses in Japan. These banks are subject to a statutory framework similar to the regulations applicable to Japanese domestic banks. Their principal sources of funds come from their overseas head offices or other branches.

A number of government financial institutions, organized in order to supplement the activities of the private banking institutions, have been in the process of business and organizational restructuring in recent years. In October 2008, some of the government financial institutions were consolidated to form Japan Finance Corporation, which mainly provides financing for small andmedium-sized enterprises and those engaged in agriculture, forestry and fishery, and also provides export financing for Japanese corporations. In October 2008, Development Bank of Japan, which mainly engages in corporate financing, and Shoko Chukin Bank, which mainly engages in financing for small andmedium-sized enterprises, were transformed into joint stock corporations. Japan Housing Finance Agency supports housing loans of private institutions through the securitization of such loans.

In April 2012, Japan Bank for International Cooperation, which provides policy-based finance with a mission to contribute to the sound development of Japan and the international economy and society, was spun off from Japan Finance Corporation and was established as a joint stock company wholly owned by the Japanese government.

Another distinctive element of the Japanese banking system is the role of the postal savings system. Postal savings deposits are gathered through the network of governmental post offices scattered throughout Japan, and their balance of deposits totaled over 200 trillion yen in the past. In recent years, the governmental postal business has been in the process of organizational restructuring. In 2003, the governmental postal business was

transferred to Japan Post, a government-owned entity established in the same year, and in 2007, Japan Post was transformed into a government-owned joint stock corporation holding four operating companies including Japan Post Bank, which currently operates as an ordinary bank. In November 2015, the shares of three main companies of the Japan Post group were listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange, with Japan Post Holdings disposing of approximately 11% of its ownership in the two subsidiaries, while the Japanese government disposed of approximately 11% of its ownership in Japan Post Holdings. Japan Post Holdings plans to initially dispose of its two subsidiaries shares gradually down to approximately 50% ownership. In April 2019, the maximum deposit amount that Japan Post Bank Co., Ltd. may accept increased from 13 million yen in aggregate for ordinary deposits and time deposits to a total of 26 million yen, 13 million yen each for ordinary deposits and time deposits.

In recent years, as a result of technological advances in the digital field called ”FinTech,” entry from different industries into areas considered to be the inherent business of financial institutions such as settlement services has been increasing.

In the Japanese securities market, a large number of registered entities are engaged in securities businesses, such as sales and underwriting of securities, investment advisory and investment management services. As deregulation of the securities market progressed, several of the country’s banking groups have entered into this market through their subsidiaries. In addition, foreign financial institutions have been active in this market.

Supervision and Regulation

Japan

Pursuant to the Banking Act (Ginkou Hou)(Ginkou Hou) (Act No. 59 of 1981, as amended), the Prime Minister of Japan has authority to supervise banks in Japan and delegates certain supervisory control over banks in Japan to the Commissioner of the Financial Services Agency. The Bank of Japan also has supervisory authority over banks in Japan, based primarily on its contractual agreements and transactions with the banks.

Financial Services Agency

Although the Prime Minister has supervisory authority over banks in Japan, except for matters prescribed by government order, this authority is generally entrusted to the Commissioner of the Financial Services Agency. Additionally, the position of Minister for Financial Services was established by the Cabinet to direct the Commissioner of the Financial Services Agency and to support the Prime Minister.

Under the Banking Act, the Prime Minister’s authority over banks and bank holding companies in Japan extends to various areas, including granting and cancellation of licenses, ordering the suspension of business in whole or in part and requiring submission of business reports or materials. Under the prompt corrective action system, the Financial Services Agency, acting on behalf of the Prime Minister, may take corrective action in the case of failure to meet the minimum capital adequacy ratio or the minimum leverage ratio of banks, their subsidiaries and companies having special relationships prescribed by the cabinet order. See “Capital Adequacy” below. These actions include requiring a financial institution to formulate and implement reform measures, requiring it to reduce assets or take other specific actions and issuing an order to suspend all or part of its business operations.

In addition, under the capital distribution constraints system introduced in March 2016, the Financial Services Agency, acting on behalf of the Prime Minister, may order a bank holding company or bank to submit and carry out a capital distribution constraints plan. See “Capital Adequacy” below. The capital distribution constraints plan is required to be considered reasonable to restore the capital buffer and include restrictions on capital distributions, such as dividends, share buybacks and bonuses payments, up to a certain amount as determined depending on the level of the capital buffer.

Furthermore, under the Japanese TLAC regulations introduced in March 2019, the Financial Services Agency, acting on behalf of the Prime Minister, may order the bank holding company of aG-SIB in Japan to be designated as the domestic resolution entity of suchG-SIB to submit reports related to improvement of TLAC or may issue a business improvement order to such domestic resolution entity if the external TLAC ratio of the domestic resolution entity or the internal TLAC of its material subsidiaries in Japan fall below the minimum requirements. See “Total Loss Absorbing Capacity” below.

Under the prompt warning system introduced in December 2002, the Financial Services Agency may take precautionary measures to maintain and promote the sound operations of financial institutions, even before those financial institutions become subject to the prompt corrective action system. These measures require a financial institution to reform profitability, credit risk management, stability and cash flow.

The Bank of Japan

The Bank of Japan is Japan’s central bank and serves as the principal instrument for the execution of Japan’s monetary policy. The principal measures by which the Bank of Japan implements monetary policy are the adjustment of its discount rate, its operations in the open market and the imposition of deposit reserve requirements. Banks in Japan are allowed to obtain borrowings from, and rediscount bills with, the Bank of Japan. Moreover, most banks in Japan maintain current accounts under agreements with the Bank of Japan pursuant to which the Bank of Japan is entitled to supervise, examine and audit the banks. The supervisory functions of the Bank of Japan are intended to enable it to ensure smooth settlement of funds among banks and other financial institutions, thereby contributing to the maintenance of an orderly financial system, whereas the supervisory practices of the Prime Minister or the Commissioner of the Financial Services Agency are intended to maintain the sound operations of banks and promote the security of depositors.

Examination of Banks

The Banking Act authorizes the Prime Minister to inspect banks and bank holding companies in Japan at any time. By evaluating banks’ systems of self-assessment, auditing their accounts and reviewing their compliance with laws and regulations, the Financial Services Agency monitors the financial soundness of banks, including the status and performance of their control systems for business activities.

The inspection of banks ishas been performed pursuant to a Financial Inspection Manual published by the Financial Services Agency. Currently,Agency, but on December 15, 2017 the Financial Services Agency takesannounced a plan to repeal the “better regulation” approachFinancial Inspection Manual after April 1, 2019 and establish a new framework for bank supervision. In order to upgrade the quality of its supervisory activities, strengthen Japan’s financial infrastructure, and to enable the Japanese economy to realize its full potential, the Financial Services Agency embarked on the review of the supervisory approaches. The Financial Services Agency announced the “JFSA’s supervisory approaches— Replacing checklists with engagement” in its financial regulationJune 2018 and supervision. This consists of four pillars: optimal combination of rules-basedthe “JFSA’s Supervisory Approaches Aimed at Financial Stability (Basic Policy on Prudential Policies)” in March 2019, and principles-based supervisory approaches; timely recognition of priority issues and effective response; encouraging voluntary efforts by financial institutions and placing greater emphasis on providing them with incentives; and improving the transparency and predictability of regulatory actions, in pursuit ofis committed to continuous improvement of the quality ofsupervisory approaches through dialogue with financial regulation and supervision. institutions, etc.

In addition to individual financial institutions, the Financial Services Agency also supervises financial groups as financial conglomerates based on its Guidelines for Financial Conglomerates Supervision that focus on management, financial soundness and operational appropriateness of a financial conglomerate as a whole.

The Bank of Japan also conducts examinations of banks similar to those undertaken by the Financial Services Agency.banks. The examinations are normally conducted once every few years, and involve such matters as examining asset quality, risk management and reliability of operations. Through these examinations, the Bank of Japan seeks to identify problems at an early stage and give corrective guidance where necessary.

In addition, the Securities and Exchange Surveillance Commission examines banks in connection with their financial instruments business activities in accordance with the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act of Japan (Kinyu(Kinyu Shouhin Torihiki Hou)Hou) (Act No. 25 of 1948, as amended).

Examination and Reporting Applicable to Shareholders

Under the Banking Act, a person who intends to hold 20% (in certain exceptional cases, 15%) or more of the voting rights of a bank is required to obtain prior approval of the Commissioner of the Financial Services Agency. In addition, the Financial Services Agency may request reports or submission of materials from, or inspect, any principal shareholder who holds 20% (in certain exceptional cases, 15%) or more of the voting rights of a bank, if necessary in order to secure the sound and appropriate operation of the business of such bank. Under limited circumstances, the Financial Services Agency may order such principal shareholder to take such measures as the Financial Services Agency deems necessary.

Furthermore, under the Banking Act, any person who becomes a holder of more than 5% of the voting rights of a bank holding company or bank must report its ownership of voting rights to the director of the relevant local finance bureau within five business days. In addition, a similar report must be made in respect of any subsequent change of 1% or more in any previously reported holding or any change in material matters set forth in reports previously filed, with some exceptions.

Deposit Insurance System

Under the Deposit Insurance Act (Yokin(Yokin Hoken Hou)Hou) (Act No. 34 of 1971, as amended), depositors are protected through the Deposit Insurance Corporation in cases where financial institutions fail to meet their obligations. The Deposit Insurance Corporation is supervised by the Prime Minister and the Minister of Finance. Subject to limited exceptions, the Prime Minister’s authority is entrusted to the Commissioner of the Financial Services Agency.

The Deposit Insurance Corporation receives annual insurance premiums from insured banks. The effective premium rate from April 2017,2019, which is the weighted average of the rates for deposits that bear no interest, are redeemable upon demand and are used by depositors primarily for payment and settlement purposes, and for other deposits, is 0.037%0.033%.

The insurance money may be paid out in case of a suspension of deposit repayments, banking license revocation, dissolution or bankruptcy of the bank. Pay outs are generally limited to a maximum of ¥10 million of principal amount, together with any interest accrued with respect to each depositor. Onlynon-interest bearing deposits, redeemable on demand and used by depositors primarily for payment and settlement functions are protected in full.

Participation in the deposit insurance system is compulsory for city banks (including Mizuho Bank), regional banks, trust banks (including Mizuho Trust & Banking), credit associations andco-operatives, labor banks and other financial institutions.

Governmental Measures to Treat Troubled Institutions

Under the Deposit Insurance Act, a Financial Reorganization Administrator can be appointed by the Prime Minister if the bank is unable to fully perform its obligations with its assets or may suspend or has suspended repayment of deposits. The Financial Reorganization Administrator will take control of and dispose of the assets of the bank and search for another institution willing to take over its business. Its business may also be transferred to a “bridge bank” established by the Deposit Insurance Corporation for the purpose of the temporary maintenance and continuation of operations of these types of institutions, and the bridge bank will seek to transfer the bank’s assets to another financial institution or dissolve the bank. The financial aid provided by the Deposit Insurance Corporation to assist another financial institution with succeeding the failed bank’s business may take the form of a monetary grant, loan or deposit of funds, purchase of assets, guarantee or assumption of debts, subscription of preferred stock or subordinated bonds, lending of subordinated loans, or loss sharing.

Where the Prime Minister recognizes that the failure of a bank which falls into any of (i) through (iii) below may cause an extremely grave problem in maintaining the financial order in Japan or the region where such bank

is operating (“systemic risk”), without taking any of the measures described in (i) through (iii) below, the Prime Minister may confirm(nintei) to take any of the following measures, after the deliberation at the Financial Crisis Management Meeting: (i) if the bank does not fall into either of the banks described in (ii) or (iii), the Deposit Insurance Corporation may subscribe for shares or subordinated bonds of, or lend subordinated loans to the bank, or subscribe for shares of the bank holding company of the bank, in order to enhance capital adequacy of the bank (item 1 measures (dai(dai ichigo sochi)sochi)); (ii) if the bank is likely to suspend or has suspended repayment of deposits or is unable to fully perform its obligations with its assets, financial aid exceeding thepay-off cost may be available to such bank (item 2 measures (dai(dai nigo sochi)sochi)); and (iii) if the bank is likely to suspend or has suspended repayment of deposits and is unable to fully perform its obligations with its assets, and the systemic risk cannot be avoided by the measure mentioned in (ii) above, the Deposit Insurance Corporation may acquire all of the bank’s shares (item 3 measures (dai(dai sango sochi)sochi)). The expenses for implementation of the above measures will be borne by the bank industry, with an exception under which the Government of Japan may provide partial subsidies for such expenses.

New orderly and effective resolution regimes for financial institutions have been discussed internationally and “Key Attributes of Effective Resolution Regimes for Financial Institutions” was published by the Financial Stability Board in November 2011 and endorsed by the G20 leaders at the Cannes summit held in November 2011. Reflecting this global trend, pursuant to certain amendments to the Deposit Insurance Act that were promulgated in June 2013 and became effective on March 6, 2014, a new resolution regime was introduced in Japan.

Under the new resolution regime stipulated in the amendments to the Deposit Insurance Act and implementing ordinances thereunder, which became effective on March 6, 2014, financial institutions including banks, insurance companies and securities companies and their holding companies, are subject to the regime.

Further, under the new resolution regime, among other things, where the Prime Minister recognizes that the failure of a financial institution which falls into either (a) or (b) below may cause significant disruption in the financial markets or other financial systems in Japan without taking any of the measures described in (a) (specified item 1 measures)(tokutei dai ichigo sochi)sochi) stipulated in Article126-2, Paragraph 1, Item 1 of the Deposit Insurance Act or the measures described in (b) (specified item 2 measures)(tokutei dai nigo sochi)sochi) stipulated in Article126-2, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the Deposit Insurance Act, the Prime Minister may confirm (specified confirmation)(tokutei nintei)nintei) to take any of the following measures, after the deliberation at the Financial Crisis Management Meeting; (a) if the financial institution does not fall into a financial institution which is unable to fully perform its obligations with its assets, the Deposit Insurance Corporation shall supervise the operation of the business of and the management and disposal of assets of that financial institution(tokubetsu (tokubetsu kanshi), and may provide it with loans or guarantees necessary to avoid the risk of significant disruption in the financial systems in Japan(shikin (shikin no kashitsuke tou), or subscribe for shares or subordinated bonds of, or lend subordinated loans to the financial institutions(tokutei (tokutei kabushiki tou no hikiuke tou) , in each case to be taken as necessary taking into consideration of the financial conditions of the financial institution; and (b) if the financial institution is or is likely to be unable to fully perform its obligations with its assets or has suspended or is likely to suspend repayment of its obligations, the Deposit Insurance Corporation shall supervise that financial institution(tokubetsu (tokubetsu kanshi), and may provide financial aid necessary to assist merger, business transfer, corporate split or other reorganization in respect to such failed financial institution (tokutei(tokutei shikin enjo)enjo). The expenses for implementation of the measures under this regime will be borne by the financial industry, with an exception under which the Government of Japan may provide partial subsidies for such expenses. If a measure set out in (b) above is determined to be taken with respect to a financial institution, the Prime Minister may order that the financial institution’s operation and assets be under the special control (tokutei kanri)(tokutei kanri) of the Deposit Insurance Corporation. The business or liabilities of the financial institution subject to the special supervision (tokubetsu kanshi)(tokubetsu kanshi) or special control (tokutei kanri)(tokutei kanri) by the Deposit Insurance Corporation as set forth above may also be transferred to a “bridge bank” established by the Deposit Insurance Corporation for the purpose of the temporary maintenance and continuation of operations of, or repayment of the liabilities of, such financial institutions, and the bridge bank will seek to transfer the bank’s business or liabilities to another financial

institution or dissolve the bank. The financial aid provided by the Deposit Insurance Corporation to assist merger, business transfer, corporate split or other reorganization in respect to the financial institution set out in (b) above may take the form of a monetary grant, loan or deposit of funds, purchase of assets, guarantee or assumption of debts, subscription of preferred stock or subordinated bonds, lending of subordinated loan, or loss sharing.

If the Deposit Insurance Corporation has provided such financial assistance, the Prime Minister may designate the movable assets and claims of the failed financial institution as not subject to attachment under Article126-16 of the Deposit Insurance Act, and such merger, business transfer, corporate split or other reorganization may be conducted outside of the court-administrated insolvency proceedings.

If the financial institution subject to the special supervision or the special control by the Deposit Insurance Corporation as set forth above is or is likely to be unable to fully perform its obligations with its assets or has suspended or is likely to suspend repayment of its obligations, the financial institution may transfer all or a material portion of its business or all or a portion of shares of its subsidiaries or implement corporate split or

certain other corporate actions with court permission in lieu of any shareholder resolutions under Article126-13 of the Deposit Insurance Act which permission may be granted by the court in accordance with the Deposit Insurance Act if (i) the financial institution is under special supervision by, or under special control of, the Deposit Insurance Corporation pursuant to the Deposit Insurance Act and (ii) the financial institution is, or is likely to be, unable to fully perform its obligations with its assets, or the financial institution has suspended, or is likely to suspend, repayment of its obligations. In addition, the Deposit Insurance Corporation must request other financial institution creditors of the failed financial institution to refrain from exercising their rights against the failed financial institution until measures necessary to avoid the risk of significant disruption to the financial system in Japan have been taken, if it is recognized that such exercise of their rights is likely to make it difficult to conduct an orderly resolution of the failed financial institution.

According to the announcement made by the Financial Services Agency in March 2014, (i) Additional Tier 1 instruments and Tier 2 instruments under Basel III issued by a bank must be written down or converted into common shares when the Prime Minister confirms that item 2 measures (dai(dai nigo sochi)sochi), item 3 measures (dai(dai sango sochi)sochi) or specified item 2 measures (tokutei(tokutei dai nigo sochi)sochi) need to be applied to the bank, and (ii) Additional Tier 1 instruments and Tier 2 instruments under Basel III issued by a bank holding company must be written down or converted into common shares when the Prime Minister confirms that specified item 2 measures (tokutei(tokutei dai nigo sochi)sochi) need to be applied to the bank holding company.

Further, under a possible model of Single Point of Entry (“SPE”) resolution described in the Japanese TLAC regulations published by the Financial Services Agency in March 2019, if the Financial Services Agency determines that a material subsidiary in Japan of a Japanese financial institution that is aG-SIB isnon-viable due to material deterioration of its financial condition after recognizing that it is or is likely to be unable to fully perform its obligations with its assets, or that it has suspended, or is likely to suspend, repayment of its obligations, and issues an order concerning restoration of financial soundness, including recapitalization and restoration of liquidity of such material subsidiary, to the resolution entity in Japan of such financial institution, the material subsidiary’s internal TLAC instruments will be written off or, if applicable, converted into equity in accordance with the applicable terms of such internal TLAC instruments. Following thewrite-off or conversion of internal TLAC instruments, if the Prime Minister recognizes that the resolution entity in Japan of the financial institution is or is likely to be unable to fully perform its obligations with its assets, or that it has suspended or is likely to suspend, repayment of its obligations, as a result of the resolution entity’s loans to, or other investment in, its material subsidiaries that are designated by the Financial Services Agency as being systemically important or that are subject to TLAC requirements or similar requirements imposed by a relevant foreign authority, becoming subject to loss absorption or otherwise, and further recognizes that the failure of such resolution entity is likely to cause a significant disruption to the Japanese financial market or system, the Prime Minister may, following deliberation by the Financial Crisis Management Meeting, confirm that specified item 2 measures (tokutei dai nigo sochi) need to be applied to the resolution entity for its orderly resolution.

Recovery and Resolution Plan

In November 2016,2018, the Financial Stability Board published the latest list ofG-SIBs. The list is annually updated by the Financial Stability Board in each November, and the list as of November 20162018 includes us. A recovery and resolution plan must be put in place for eachG-SIB and be regularly reviewed and updated. In Japan, under the Comprehensive Guidelines for Supervision of Financial Instruments Business Operators, etc., as part of crisis management, financial institutions identified asG-SIBs must prepare and submit a recovery plan, which includes the triggers to implement the recovery plan and an analysis of recovery options, to the Financial Services Agency, and the Financial Services Agency must prepare a resolution plan for eachG-SIB.

Capital Injection by the Government

The Strengthening Financial Functions Act (Kinyu(Kinyu Kinou no Kyouka no tame no Tokubetsu Sochi ni kansuru Houritsu)Houritsu) (Act No. 128 of 2004) was enacted on June 18, 2004 in order to establish a scheme of publicmoneypublic money injection into financial institutions and thereby enhance the soundness of such financial institutions on orprioror prior to March 31, 2008 and revitalize economic activities in the regions where they do business. OnDecemberOn December 17, 2008, certain amendments to the Strengthening Financial Functions Act took effect. TheseamendmentsThese amendments relaxed certain requirements for public money injection into Japanese banks and bank holdingcompaniesholding companies and other financial institutions under the prior scheme and extended the period of application therefor,which had expired on March 31, 2008, to March 31, 2012. These amendments aim to promote not only thesoundnessthe soundness of such financial institutions but also the extension of loans or other forms of credit to small andmedium-sizedenterprises in order to revitalize local economies. In response to the Great East Japan Earthquake, the law was amended in June 2011 to extend the period for application to March 31, 2017 and to include special exceptions for disaster-affected financial institutions. In 2016, the law was further amended to extend the period for application to March 31, 2022. None of the financial institutions within the Mizuho group are subject to such special exceptions.

Bank Holding Companies

Under the amendments to the Banking Act, which became effective from April 2017, a bank holding company is required to administrate the businesses of the bank holding company group and is, in principle, prohibited from carrying out businesses other than administrating such businesses and matters incidental to such businesses; however, a bank holding company may, withgiven prior approval of the Prime Minister, a bank holding company may carry out certain operations common operations ofto its group companies so as to improve the efficiency of their operations. Business activities for subsidiaries of bank holding companies are limited to finance-related businesses and incidental businesses.

The Anti-Monopoly Act (Shiteki(Shiteki Dokusen no Kinshi oyobi Kousei Torihiki no Kakuho ni kansuru Houritsu)Houritsu) (Act No. 54 of 1947, as amended) prohibits a bank from holding more than 5% of another company’s voting rights. This does not apply to a bank holding company, although the bank holding company is subject to general shareholding restrictions under the Anti-Monopoly Act. The Banking Act does, however, in principle, prohibit a bank holding company and its subsidiaries, on an aggregate basis, from holding more than 15% (in contrast to 5% in the case of a bank and its subsidiaries) of the voting rights of certain types of companies not permitted to become subsidiaries of bank holding companies. Despite the foregoing shareholding restrictions, under the amendments to the Banking Act, which became effective from April 2017, bank holding companies and banks, with prior approval of the Prime Minister, can acquire and own voting rights of companies whose businesses contribute or are expected to contribute to the increased sophistication of the banking business or the enhancement of customer convenience by utilizing information and communication technology that exceed the threshold of the voting rights described above.

Financial Instruments and Exchange Act

The Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (Kinyu(Kinyu Shouhin Torihiki Hou)Hou) requires Mizuho Financial Group to file with the Director General of the Kanto Local Finance Bureau an annual securities report including

consolidated andnon-consolidated financial statements in respect of each financial period, supplemented by quarterly and extraordinary reports.

Under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act, registered Financial Instruments Business Operators (kinyu-shouhin(kinyu-shouhin torihiki gyousha)gyousha), such as Mizuho Securities, as well as Registered Financial Institutions (touroku(touroku kinyu kikan)kikan), such as Mizuho Bank and Mizuho Trust & Banking, are required to provide customers with detailed disclosure regarding the financial products they offer and take other measures to protect investors, including a delivery of explanatory documents to such customers prior to and upon the conclusion of transactional agreements.

Financial Instrument Business Operators and Registered Financial Institutions are subject to the supervision of the Financial Services Agency pursuant to delegation by the Prime Minister of Japan. Some of the supervisory authority of the Financial Services Agency is further delegated to the Securities and Exchange Surveillance Commission, which exercises its supervisory power over such registered institutions by conducting site inspections and requesting information necessary for such inspections.Non-compliance or interference with such inspection may result in such registrants being subject to criminal penalty under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act.

Certain amendments to the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act and the Banking Act, which came into effect on June 1, 2009, revamped the firewall regulations regarding the holding of concurrent offices or posts among banks, securities firms and insurance firms and required banks, securities firms and insurance firms to establish systems for managing conflicts of interest in order to protect customers’ interests and expanded the types of business services that banks and certain other financial firms can provide.

Sales of Financial Products

As a result of financial deregulation, more financial products, including highly structured and complicated products, can now be more freely marketed to customers. In response to this, the Act of Sales of Financial Products (Kinyu(Kinyu Shouhin no Hanbai tou ni kansuru Houritsu)Houritsu) (Act No. 101 of 2000, as amended), effective from April 2001, introduced measures to protect financial service customers by: requiring financial service providers to provide customers with certain important information, including risks with respect to deficit of principal associated with the financial products they offer and any restrictions on the period for exercising rights or the period for rescission, unless the customers fall within the ambit of professional investors or express their intent to the contrary; and holding financial service providers liable for damages caused by a failure to follow those requirements. The amount of loss of principal is refutably presumed to be the amount of damages. Additionally, the law requires financial service providers to follow certain regulations on solicitation measures as well as to endeavor to solicit customers in an appropriate manner and formulate and publicize a solicitation policy.

Self-Assessment and Reserves

The prompt corrective action system requires financial institutions to establish a self-assessment program that complies with the Inspection Manual issued by the Financial Services Agency and related laws such as the Financial Reconstruction Act (Kinyu(Kinyu Kinou no Saisei no tameno Kinkyu Sochi ni kansuru Houritsu)Houritsu) (Act No. 132 of 1998, as amended). Financial institutions are required to analyze their assets, giving due consideration to accounting principles and other applicable rules and to classify their assets into four categories according to asset recovery risk and risk of impairment based on the classification of the obligor (normal obligors, watch obligors, intensive control obligors, substantially bankrupt obligors and bankrupt obligors) taking into account the likelihood of repayment and the risk of impairment to the value of the assets. The results of self-assessment should be reflected in thewrite-off and allowance according to the standard established by financial institutions pursuant to the guidelines issued by the Japanese Institute of Certified Public Accountants and Inspection Manual issued by the Financial Services Agency. Based on the results of the self-assessment, financial institutions may establish reserve amounts for their loan portfolio as may be considered adequate at the relevant balance sheet date, even if all or part of such reserves may not be immediately tax deductible under Japanese tax law.

Based on the accounting standards for banks issued by the Japanese Bankers Association, a bank is required to establish general reserves, specific reserves and reserves for probable losses on loans relating to restructuring countries.

In addition, in June 2018, the Financial Services Agency announced in the “JFSA’s supervisory approaches—Replacing checklists with engagement” that it would, using current practice as a starting point, discuss the future policy direction of loan classification, loan write-offs and loan-loss provisioning with financial institutions, external auditors and other experts. Based on this, the Financial Services Agency established the “Study Group on Supervisory Approaches to Lending Practices” in June 2018, and is planning to discuss and issue discussion papers regarding future supervisory approaches towards lending and to engage in dialogues with a wide range of stakeholders.

Credit Limits

The Banking Act restricts the aggregate amount of exposure to any single customer or customer group for the purposes of avoiding excessive concentration of credit risks and promoting the fair and extensive utilization of bank credit. The limits applicable to a bank holding company and bank with respect to their aggregate exposure to any single customer or customer group are established by the Banking Act and regulations thereunder. The Banking Act and the related regulations were amended, which became effective from December 2014, to tighten the previous restrictions to meet international standards. As a result of these amendments, the current credit limit for a single customer or a customer group is 25% of the total qualifying capital, with certain adjustments, of the bank holding company or bank and its subsidiaries and affiliates.

Restriction on Shareholdings

The Act Concerning Restriction on Shareholdings by Banks (Ginkou(Ginkou tou no Kabushiki tou no Hoyu no Seigen tou ni kansuru Houritsu)Houritsu) (Act No. 131 of 2001, as amended) requires Japanese banks (including bank holding companies) and their subsidiaries to limit the aggregate market value (excluding unrealized gains, if any) of their holdings in equity securities to an amount equal to 100% of their Tier 1 capital in order to reduce exposure to stock price fluctuations.

Share Purchase Program

The Banks’ Shareholdings Purchase Corporation was established in January 2002 in order to purchase shares from banks and other financial institutions until September 30, 2006 pursuant to the Act Concerning Restriction on Shareholdings by Banks. The Bank’s Shareholdings Purchase Corporation is allowed to resume purchases of shares held by financial institutions as well as shares of financial institutions held bynon-financial institutions, up to a maximum amount of ¥20 trillion between March 12, 2009 and March 31, 2022. The Bank’s Shareholdings Purchase Corporation purchased ¥1,305.3 billion of shares during the period from March 12, 2009 through March 31, 2017. The Bank’s Shareholdings Purchase Corporation will dispose of the purchased shares by March 31, 2032 by taking into consideration the effects on the stock market.

The Bank of Japan also purchased ¥387.8 billion of shares held by banks and other financial institutions during the period from February 23, 2009 through April 30, 2010. The Bank of Japan generally will not sell the purchased shares until March 31, 2016. The Bank of Japan will dispose of the purchased shares by March 31, 2026 by taking into consideration the effects on the stock market.

Capital Adequacy

The capital adequacy guidelines applicable to Japanese banks and bank holding companies with international operations supervised by the Financial Services Agency closely follow the risk-adjusted approach proposed by the Bank for International Settlements and are intended to further strengthen the soundness and

stability of Japanese banks. Under the risk-based capital framework of these guidelines, balance sheet assets andoff-balance-sheet exposures are assessed according to broad categories of relative risk, based primarily on the credit risk of the counterparty, country transfer risk and the risk regarding the category of transactions.

In December 2010, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision issued its Basel III rules text, which builds on the International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards document (“Basel II”), to strengthen the regulation, supervision, and risk management of the banking sector. Basel III text presents the details of global regulatory standards on bank capital adequacy and liquidity. The rules text sets out higher and better-quality capital, better risk coverage, the introduction of a leverage ratio as a backstop to the risk-based requirement, measures to promote thebuild-up of capital that can be drawn down in periods of stress, and the introduction of two global liquidity standards. For further information of the leverage ratio and the two global liquidity standards, see “Leverage”Leverage Ratio” and “Liquidity” below, respectively.

The Financial Services Agency’s revisions to its capital adequacy guidelines became effective from March 31, 2013, which generally reflect rules in the Basel III text that have been applied from January 1, 2013.

Under the revised guidelines, the minimum capital adequacy ratio is 8% on both a consolidated andnon-consolidated basis for banks with international operations, such as Mizuho Bank and Mizuho Trust & Banking or on a consolidated basis for bank holding companies with international operations, such as Mizuho Financial Group. Within the minimum capital adequacy ratio, the Common Equity Tier 1 capital requirement is 4.5% and the Tier 1 capital requirement is 6.0%.

Japanese banks with only domestic operations and bank holding companies the subsidiaries of which operate only within Japan are subject to the revised capital adequacy guidelines that have been applied from March 31, 2014, and those banks and bank holding companies are required to have a minimum Core Capital ratio of 4%. However, those banks and bank holding companies that apply the internal rating based approach are required to have a minimum Common Equity Tier 1 ratio of 4.5% on both a consolidated andnon-consolidated basis, calculated on the assumption that the banks and bank holding companies are those with international operations.

Under the revised capital adequacy guidelines based on the Basel III rules that have been applied to banks and bank holding companies each with international operations from March 31, 2013, there are regulatory adjustments such as goodwill and other intangibles, deferred tax assets, investments in the capital of banking, financial and insurance entities etc. shall be deducted under certain conditions for the purpose of calculating capital adequacy ratios, and the requirements of regulatory adjustments were enhanced under the revised capital adequacy guidelines. For example, under the capital adequacy guidelines prior to the revision thereto under the Basel III rules, the maximum amount of net deferred tax assets under Japanese GAAP that major Japanese banks, including bank holding companies, could record without diminishing the amount of Tier 1 capital for purposes of calculating capital adequacy ratio was 20% of Tier 1 capital. Under the revised capital adequacy guidelines based on the Basel III rules, deferred tax assets that arise from temporary differences will be recognized as part of Common Equity Tier 1 capital, with recognition capped at 10% of Common Equity Tier 1 capital under certain conditions, while other deferred tax assets, such as those relating to net loss carryforwards, will be deducted in full from Common Equity Tier 1 capital net of deferred tax liabilities. These regulatory adjustments based on the Basel III rules began at 20% of the required deductions in the calculation of Common Equity Tier 1 capital in March 2014 and will bewere increased by 20% increments per year, throughand became fully effective in March 2018 when the regulatory adjustments reach 100%.2018.

In November 2015, the Financial Services Agency published revised capital adequacy guidelines and related ordinances to introduce the capital buffer requirements under the Basel III rules for Japanese banks and bank

holding companies with international operations, which include the capital conservation buffer, the countercyclical buffer and the additional loss absorbency requirements forG-SIBs and domestic systemically important banks(“D-SIBs”). These guidelines have become effective on March 31, 2016. The capital conservation buffer, the countercyclical capital buffer and the additional loss absorption capacity requirement for

G-SIBs andD-SIBs must be met with Common Equity Tier 1 capital under the revised guidelines, and if such buffer requirements are not satisfied, a capital distribution constraints plan is required to be submitted to the Financial Services Agency and carried out. The capital conservation buffer is beingwas phased in starting in March 2016 at 0.625% until becomingand became fully effective in March 2019 at 2.5%. In addition, subject to national discretion by the respective regulatory authorities, if the relevant national authority judges a period of excess credit growth to be leading to thebuild-up of system-wide risk, a countercyclical capital buffer ranging from 0% to 2.5% would also be imposed on banking organizations. The countercyclical capital buffer is a weighted average of the buffers deployed across all the jurisdictions to which the banking organization has credit exposures. Further, we were designated as both aG-SIB andD-SIB, and the additional loss absorption capacity requirement applied to us was 1.0%. The additional loss absorption capacity requirement was the same as that imposed by the Financial Stability Board, which is beingwas phased in starting in March 2016 at 0.25% until becomingand became fully effective in March 2019 at 1.0%.

Under the capital adequacy guidelines, banks and bank holding companies each with international operations are required to measure and apply capital charges with respect to their credit risks,risk, market risksrisk and operational risks.risk.

Under the guidelines, banks and bank holding companies have several choices for the methodologies to calculate their capital requirements for credit risk, market risk and operational risk. Approval of the Financial Services Agency is necessary to adopt advanced methodologies for calculation, and Mizuho Financial Group started to apply the AIRB approach for the calculation of credit risk from the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009 and also apply the AMA for the calculation of operational risk from September 30, 2009.

As part of its ongoing review of the calculation of risk-weighted assets, inIn December 2014,2017, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (“BCBS”) published two consultative documents on revisionsthe finalized Basel III reforms endorsed by the Group of Central Bank Governors and Heads of Supervision. The finalized reforms complement the initial phase of Basel III reforms set forth above, seek to restore credibility in the calculation of risk-weighted assets and improve the comparability of banks’ capital ratios. Such reforms include the following elements:

a revised standardized approach for credit risk, (later revised in December 2015)which is designed to improve the robustness and onrisk sensitivity of the designexisting approach;

revisions to the internal ratings-based approach for credit risk, where the use of the most advanced internally modelled approaches forlow-default portfolios will be limited;

revisions to the credit valuation adjustment (CVA) framework, including the removal of the internally modelled approach and the introduction of a revised standardized approach;

a revised standardized approach for operational risk, which will replace the existing standardized approaches and the advanced measurement approaches;

revisions to the capital floor, frameworkunder which banks’ risk-weighted assets generated by internal models must be no lower than 72.5% of the total risk-weighted assets as calculated using only the standardized approaches under the revised Basel III framework; and

requirements to disclose their risk-weighted assets based on the standardized approaches.

In addition, under the finalized Basel III reforms,non-internalG-SIBs modeled approach. are required to meet a leverage ratio buffer, which will take the form of a Tier 1 capital buffer set at 50% of the applicableG-SIB’s risk-weighted capital buffer, and various refinements are made to the definition of the leverage ratio exposure measure based on the text of the leverage ratio framework issued by the BCBS in January 2014.

The revised proposals are part of a range of policyframework will mainly take effect from January 1, 2022, and supervisory measures that aim to enhance reliability and comparability of risk-weighted capital ratios across banks. The proposal on the revisions to the standardized approach includes, among other things, to decrease mechanistic reliance on external credit rating agencies by introducing grade classification and due diligence requirements to the determination of risk weights. The proposal on the capital floor framework seeks to replacewill be phased in from January 1, 2022, with the current transitionalinitial capital floor based on the Basel I standard with a capital floor based on the revised standardized approach, which is currently under review as described above. Furthermore, in March 2016, the BCBS published a consultative document on the reduction of variation in credit risk-weighted assets. The document presented proposals which would remove the option to use the internal-ratings based approaches for credit risk for certain exposures, adopt exposure level50%, and model-parameter floors for portfolios where the internal-ratings based approaches remain available, and provide greater specification of parameter estimation practices for portfolios where the internal-ratings based approaches remain available. The various proposals are intended towill be complementary to one another, with the goal of reducing excessive variability in risk-weighted assets across banks. The schedule of implementation of the various proposals has not been stated explicitly.fully implemented at 72.5% from January 1, 2027.

For further information regarding capital adequacy, see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Capital Adequacy—Regulatory Capital Requirements.”

Leverage Ratio

The leverage ratio framework is critical and complementary to the risk-based capital framework that will help ensure broad and adequate capture of bothon- andoff-balance sheet sources of banks’ leverage. This

simple,non-risk-based measure will restrict thebuild-up of excessive leverage in the banking sector to avoid destabilizing deleveraging processes that can damage the broader financial system and the economy. In April 2016, the BCBS released a consultative document regarding proposed revisions to the design and calibration of the Basel III leverage ratio framework including an additional leverage ratio requirement applicable toG-SIBs. Any final adjustments to the definition and calibrationImplementation of the leverage ratio will be maderequirements began with bank-level reporting to national supervisors of the leverage ratio and its components, and public disclosure is required from January 2015. Basel III’s leverage ratio is defined as the “capital measure” (numerator) divided by the BCBS by 2017,“exposure measure” (denominator) and is expressed as a percentage. The capital measure is defined as Tier 1 capital, and the minimum leverage ratio is defined as 3%. The Financial Services Agency applied the requirement from March 31, 2019 to meet the minimum leverage ratio for bank holding companies and banks with a view to migrate to a Pillar 1 (minimum capital requirements) treatment oninternational operations.

The leverage ratio requirements under the finalized definition of the leverage ratio exposure measure and the leverage ratio buffer requirement forG-SIBs, will take effect from January 1, 2018, based on appropriate review and calibration.2022.

For further information regarding the leverage ratio, see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Capital Adequacy—Regulatory Capital Requirements.”

Liquidity

Two minimum standards for funding liquidity will be introduced. The liquidity coverage ratio (“LCR”) is intended to promote resilience to potential liquidity disruptions over athirty-day horizon and help ensure that global banks have sufficient, unencumbered, high-quality liquid assets (“HQLA”) to offset the net cash outflows it could encounter under an acute short-term stress scenario. The Group of Governors and Heads of Supervision agreed on a revised LCR standard on January 6, 2013, and the BCBS issued the text of the revised LCR standard on January 7, 2013. The LCR guidelines of the Financial Services Agency, which reflect the rules in such text, have been applied to banks and bank holding companies with international operations from March 31, 2015, under the LCR guidelines, LCR is defined as the ratio obtained by dividing the sum of the amounts of High-Quality liquid assets by the amount of net cash outflows, each as defined in and calculated pursuant to such guidelines. In accordance with the LCR standard under the LCR guidelines, the stock of unencumbered HQLA is to constitute “level 1” assets, which include cash, central bank reserves and certain marketable securities backed by sovereigns and central banks, and “Level 2” assets, which include certain government securities covered bonds, corporate debt securities and, to a limited extent, lower-rated corporate bonds, residential mortgage-backed securities and equities that meet certain conditions. “Level 2” assets are subject to certain haircuts based on types of securities and credit ratings. The minimum LCR under the LCR guidelines is 100% on both a consolidated andnon-consolidated basis for banks with international operations or on a consolidated basis for bank holding companies with international operations. LCR is subject tophase-in arrangements pursuant to which the LCR rises in equal annual steps of 10 percentage points to reach 100% on January 1, 2019, with a minimum requirement of 80% during the period from January 1 to December 31, 2017. The BCBS issued final requirements forLCR-related disclosures on January 12, 2014, and the LCR disclosure guidelines of the Financial Services Agency, which reflect such requirements, have been applied to banks and bank holding companies with international operations from June 30, 2015. The LCR disclosure guidelines require such banks and bank holding companies to disclose their LCR in common templates starting from information as of June 30, 2015.

The net stable funding ratio (“NSFR”) requires a minimum amount of stable sources of funding at a bank relative to the liquidity profiles of the assets, as well as the potential for contingent liquidity needs arising fromoff-balance sheet commitments, over aone-year horizon. The BCBS finalized the NSFR framework in October 2014, and the NSFR iswas scheduled to be introduced as a minimum standard on March 31, 2019 by the Financial Services Agency.Agency, but the introduction was postponed in March 2019.

Total Loss Absorbing Capacity

Related to regulatory capital requirements, in November 2015, the FSB issued the final TLAC standard forG-SIBs. The TLAC standard has been designed so that failingG-SIBs will have sufficient loss-absorbing and recapitalization capacity available in resolution for authorities to implement an orderly resolution.G-SIBs will be required to meet the TLAC requirement alongside the minimum regulatory requirements set out in the Basel III framework. Specifically,G-SIBs will be required to meet a Minimum TLAC requirement of at least 16% of the

resolution group’s risk-weighted assets as from January 1, 2019 and at least 18% as from January 1, 2022. Minimum TLAC must also be at least 6% of the Basel III leverage ratio denominator from January 1, 2019, and at least 6.75% from January 1, 2022.

Following the publication of the final TLAC standards forG-SIBs by the FSB, in April 2016, the Financial Services Agency published an explanatory paper outlining its approach for the introduction of the TLAC framework in Japan.Japan, and a revised version of this document was published in April 2018. In March 2019, the Financial Services Agency published regulatory notices and related materials to implement the TLAC requirements in Japan, which is being phased in for JapaneseG-SIBs beginning March 31, 2019. According to the Financial Services Agency’s approach above, which is subject to change based on future international discussions, the preferred resolution strategy forG-SIBs in Japan as well as a domestic systematically important bank in Japan which is Single Pointdeemed of Entry (“SPE”particular need for a cross-border resolution arrangement and of particular systemic significance to Japanese financial system if it fails (together withG-SIBs in Japan, the “Covered SIBs”), is SPE resolution, in which resolution powerstools are applied to the topultimate holding company of a group by a single national resolution authority, although the actual measures to be taken will be determined on acase-by-case basis considering the actual condition of the relevant JapaneseG-SIBCovered SIB in crisis. To implement this SPE resolution strategy effectively, the Financial Services Agency plans to require bankrequires the ultimate holding companiescompany in Japan of JapaneseG-SIBs, which will bethe relevant Covered SIB designated as the resolution entities,entity in Japan of such Covered SIB by the Financial Services Agency to (i) meet the minimum external TLAC requirements, provided under the FSB’s TLAC standard, and (ii) cause their material subsidiaries or materialsub-groups that are designated as systemically important by the Financial Services Agency including but not limitedor that are subject to certain materialsub-groups as provided inTLAC requirements or similar requirements by the FSB’s TLAC standard,relevant foreign authority to maintain a certain level of capital and debt recognized by the Financial Services Agency as having loss-absorbing and recapitalization capacity, or Internalinternal TLAC. Under the Japanese TLAC regulations, the Financial Services Agency designated Mizuho Financial Group as the resolution entity in Japan for our group, which is subject to the external TLAC requirements in Japan, and designated Mizuho Bank, Mizuho Trust & Banking and Mizuho Securities as Mizuho Financial Group’s material subsidiaries in Japan which are subject to Japan’s internal TLAC requirements. In addition, under the approach,Japanese TLAC regulations,G-SIBs are required to meet a minimum TLAC requirement of at least 16% of the resolution group’s risk-weighted assets from March 31, 2019 and at least 18% from March 31, 2022. Minimum TLAC must also be at least 6% of the Basel III leverage ratio denominator from March 31, 2019, and at least 6.75% from March 31, 2022. JapaneseG-SIBs would beare allowed to count the Japanese Deposit Insurance Fund Reserves in an amount equivalent to 2.5% of their consolidated risk-weighted assets from March 31, 2019, and 3.5% of their consolidated risk-weighted assets from March 31, 2022, as their external TLAC.

Protection of Personal Information

The Personal Information Protection Act (Kojin(Kojin Jouhou no Hogo ni kansuru Houritsu)Houritsu) (Act No. 57 of 2003, as amended) and related guidelines impose various requirements on businesses, including us, that use databases containing personal information, such as appropriate custody of such information and restrictions on information sharing with third parties.Non-compliance with the order issued by the Personal Information Protection Commission to take necessary measures to comply with the law will subject us to criminal and/or administrative sanctions.

Prevention of Money Laundering

Under the Act Preventing Transfer of Profits Generated from Crime (Hanzai(Hanzai ni yoru Syueki no Iten Boushi ni kansuru Houritsu)Houritsu) (Act No. 22 of 2007, as amended), which addresses money laundering and terrorism concerns, financial institutions and other entities such as credit card companies are required to perform customer identification, submit suspicious transaction reports and maintain records of transactions. Certain amendments to

the law became effective in April 2013, which tightened, among other things, customer identification requirements. Further amendments to the law were promulgated in November 2014 and became effective on October 1, 2016 for clarification of the judgment method of suspicious transactions, strict verification at the time of the conclusion of correspondence contracts and expansion of the obligation for business operators to make efforts to develop necessary systems.

In February 2018, the Financial Services Agency issued “Guidelines for Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism” to clarify the basic stance on risk management practices against money laundering and terrorists financing in order to encourage financial institutions to improve their regimes to effectively prevent money laundering and terrorists financing. The guidelines were partially revised on April 10, 2019, intending to further enhance financial institutions’ risk management for anti-money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism.

Act Concerning Protection of Depositors from Illegal Withdrawals Made by Forged or Stolen Cards

The Act Concerning Protection of Depositors from Illegal Withdrawals Made by Forged or Stolen Cards (Gizou(Gizou Kaado tou oyobi Tounan Kaado tou wo Mochiite Okonawareru Fuseina Kikaishiki YochokinHaraimodoshi tou karano Yochokinsha no Hogo tou ni kansuru Houritsu)Houritsu) (Act No. 94 of 2005, as amended) requires financial institutions to establish internal systems to prevent illegal withdrawals of deposits using forged or stolen bank cards. The law also requires financial institutions, among other matters, to compensate depositors for any amount illegally withdrawn using forged bankcards, unless the financial institution can verify that it acted in good faith without negligence and that there was gross negligence on the part of the relevant account holder.

United States

As a result of our operations in the United States, we are subject to extensive U.S. federal and state supervision and regulation. We engage in U.S. banking activities through Mizuho Bank’s New York, Chicago, Los Angeles and Park Avenue (New York) branches and Houston, Atlanta, andDallas, San Francisco and Washington, D.C. representative offices. We also own one bank in the United States, Mizuho Bank (USA), as well as controlling interests in several other subsidiaries, including Mizuho Trust & Banking Co. (USA), which is engaged primarily in the banking services, trust services and custody business, and Mizuho Securities USA LLC, a U.S. broker dealer engaged in the securities business.

The Bank Secrecy Act, as amended by the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 (the “PATRIOT Act”), contains measures to prevent, detect and prosecute terrorism and international money laundering by imposing significant compliance and due diligence obligations, creating new crimes and penalties and expanding the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the United States. The Bank Secrecy Act, as amended, imposes anti-money laundering compliance obligations on U.S. financial institutions, including the U.S. offices of foreign banks. In recent years, federal and state regulatory and law enforcement authorities have closely scrutinized the compliance by financial institutions with the Bank Secrecy Act and anti-money laundering rules.

Mizuho Financial Group, Mizuho Bank and Mizuho Americas are financial holding companies (“FHCs”) within the meaning of the U.S. Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the “BHCA”), and are subject to regulation and supervision thereunder by the “Federal Reserve Board”.Federal Reserve. As a matter of law, these three companies are required to act as a source of financial strength to Mizuho Bank (USA) and Mizuho Trust & Banking Co. (USA). The BHCA generally prohibits us from acquiring, directly or indirectly, the ownership or control of more than 5% of any class of voting shares of any company engaged in the United States in activities other than banking or activities that are financial in nature or incidental or complementary to financial activity. This general prohibition is subject to certain exceptions, including an exception that permits us to acquire up to 100% of the voting interests in any company engaged in nonfinancial activities that we do not routinely manage, generally for a period of up to 10 years, under our merchant banking authority. In addition, U.S. regulatory approval is generally required for us to acquire more than 5% of any class of voting shares of a U.S. bank, savings association or bank holding company.

Mizuho Financial Group and the former Mizuho Corporate Bank, now Mizuho Bank, became FHCs in December 2006, and Mizuho Americas became an FHC in July 2016. As FHCs, we, Mizuho Bank, and Mizuho Americas and the companies under their control are permitted to engage in a broader range of activities in the U.S. and abroad than permitted for bank holding companies and their subsidiaries. For example, FHC status under the BHCA permits banking groups in the United States to engage in comprehensive investment banking businesses, such as the underwriting of and dealing in corporate bonds, equities and other types of securities. FHC statussecurities, and therefore enables our group to promote our investment banking business on a broader basis in the United States.

As a financial holding company,To retain our status as an FHC, we aremust also subject tocomply with certain additional regulatory requirements. For example, we and each of our U.S. insured depository institution subsidiaries with operations in the United States must be “well capitalized,” meaning maintenance of a common equity Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 6.5%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 6%8%, a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 10% and a leverage ratio of at least 5%. We and each of our U.S. insured depository institution subsidiaries must also be “well managed,” including that we and they maintain examination ratings that are at least satisfactory. Further, Mizuho Financial Group and Mizuho Bank must also meet such capital standards as calculated under their home country standards (which must be comparable to the capital required for a U.S. bank) and must be well managed under standards comparable to those required for a U.S. bank. Failure to comply with such requirements would require us to prepare a remediation plan, and we would not be able to undertake new business activities or acquisitions based on our status as a financial holding companyan FHC during any period of noncompliance without the prior approval of the Federal Reserve Board, and divestiture or termination of certain business activities, or termination of our U.S. branches and agencies, may be required as a consequence of failing to correct such conditions within 180 days.

U.S. branches, agencies and representative offices of foreign banks must be licensed, and are also supervised and regulated, by either a state banking authority or by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the U.S. federal bank regulatory agency that charters and regulates national banks and federal branches and agencies of foreign banks. Each branch and representative office in the United States of Mizuho Bank is state-

licensed.state-licensed. Under U.S. federal banking laws, state-licensed branches and agencies of foreign banks, as a general matter, may engage only in activities that would be permissible for their federally-licensed counterparts, unless the Federal Reserve Board determines that the additional activity is consistent with sound practices. U.S. federal banking laws also subject state-licensed branches and agencies to the same single-borrower lending limits that apply to federal branches and agencies, which generally are the same assubstantially similar to the lending limits applicable to national banks, but are based on the capital of the entire foreign bank.

The New York branch of Mizuho Bank is subject to supervision, examination and regulation by the New York State Department of Financial Services (“NYDFS”) as well as by the Federal Reserve Board.Reserve. Except for a prohibition on such branch accepting retail deposits, a state-licensed branch generally has the same powers as a state-chartered bank in such state. New York State has an asset pledge requirement for branches equal to the greater of 1% of average total liabilities for the previous month or $2 million, provided that an institution designated as a “well-rated foreign banking corporation” is permitted to maintain a reduced asset pledge with a cap of $100 million. The New York State Department of Financial Services may require higher amounts for supervisory reasons. Each other U.S. branch and representative office of Mizuho Bank is also subject to regulation and examination by the state banking authority of the state in which itsuch branch or representative office is located. The deposits of Mizuho Bank’s U.S. branches are not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”).

Mizuho Bank (USA) is a New York state-chartered bank that is a member of the Federal Reserve System whose deposits are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”).FDIC. As such, Mizuho Bank (USA) is subject to regulation, supervision and examination by the Federal Reserve Board and the New York State Department of Financial Services,NYDFS, as well as to relevant FDIC regulation.

Mizuho Trust & Banking Co. (USA) is a state-chartered bank and trust company that is not a member of the Federal Reserve System, but whose deposits are insured by the FDIC. As such, Mizuho Trust & Banking Co. (USA) is subject to regulation, supervision and examination by the FDIC and the New York State Department of Financial Services.

In the United States, U.S.-registered broker-dealers are regulated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). As a U.S.-registered broker-dealer, Mizuho Securities USA is subject to regulations that cover all aspects of the securities business, including sales methods, trade practices among broker-dealers, use and safekeeping of customers’ funds and securities, capital structure, recordkeeping, the financing of customers’ purchases and the conduct of directors, officers and employees.

In the United States, comprehensive financial regulatory reform legislation, titled the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Dodd Frank“Dodd-Frank Act”), was signed into law by President Obama on July 21, 2010.provides a broad framework for significant regulatory changes across most areas of U.S. financial regulation. Among other things, the Dodd-Frank Act directs the federal banking regulators to establishaddresses systemic risk oversight, minimum leverage and risk-based capital requirements for insured depository institutions and depository institution holding companies.companies, and the resolution of failing systemically significant financial institutions.

The Dodd-Frank Act provides regulators with tools to impose greater capital, leverage and liquidity requirements and other prudential standards, particularly for financial institutions that pose significant systemic risk and bank holding companies with $50 billion or more in consolidated assets. In imposing such heightened prudential standards on foreign banking organizations such as Mizuho Bank, the Federal Reserve Board is directed to take into account the principle of national treatment and equality of competitive opportunity, and the extent to which the foreign bank holdingbanking organization is subject to comparable home country standards. On[In February 18, 2014, the Federal Reserve Board finalized requirementsrules (the “FBO Rules”) under Regulation YY that impose enhanced prudential standards on certain large foreign banking organizations having a U.S. presence, such as Mizuho Bank. In particular,Under the FBO Rules, large foreign banking organizations, including us, and their U.S. operations are subject to risk management requirements, risk-based capital and leverage limits, capital stress testing requirements, liquidity requirements and, in certain circumstances, asset management requirements. Additionally, in August 2018, the Federal Reserve Board expects to finalizefinalized single counterparty credit limits and early remediation requirements for large foreign banking organizations at a later date.with respect to their U.S. operations. In addition, under the FBO Rules, foreign banking organizations with consolidated U.S. assets of

$50 $50 billion or more (excluding the assets of U.S. branches and agencies) will beare, as of July 1, 2016, required to createestablish or designate a separately capitalizedtop-tier U.S. intermediate holding company (“IHC”) that willwould hold all of its U.S. subsidiaries and be subject to certain capital, liquidity and other enhanced prudential standards on an IHC consolidated basis. In consideration of certain enhanced prudential requirements under the Federal Reserve Board’s Regulation YY,FBO Rules, we established a new U.S. bank holding company, Mizuho Americas, which is a wholly owned direct subsidiary of Mizuho Bank and broughtas of July 1, 2016. Mizuho Americas is currently the holding company for our U.S. bank subsidiaries,subsidiary, Mizuho Bank (USA) and Mizuho Trust & Banking Co. (USA), and our U.S. securities broker dealer, Mizuho Securities USA LLC, together as subsidiaries under the holding company.and certain other our U.S. subsidiaries. The establishment of Mizuho Americas was part of a larger internal corporate reorganization, which was taken with the aim of, among other things, strengthening corporate governance practices and operations.

On May 24, 2018, the U.S. Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief and Consumer Protection Act (the “Reform Act”) was signed into law. Among other regulatory changes, the Reform Act raised the threshold for automatic application of enhanced prudential standards to foreign banking organizations (“FBOs”) under the Dodd-Frank Act. The Reform Act, however, did not require the Federal Reserve Board to change the enhanced prudential standards applicable to FBOs with more than $100 billion in total consolidated assets, such as us.

In April 2019, the Federal Reserve Board issued a proposed rule that would implement the Reform Act’s changes to the application of enhanced prudential standards with respect to FBOs (the “FBO Tailoring Proposal”). The FBO Tailoring Proposal would delineate three categories of enhanced prudential standards applicable to FBOs based on an FBO’s asset size and other factors such as the degree of the cross-jurisdictional activity, reliance on short-term wholesale funding, nonbank assets, andoff-balance sheet exposures of an FBO’s U.S. operations. The FBO Tailoring Proposal generally would determine the stringency of enhanced prudential standards applicable to FBOs based on the risk profile of the FBO’s U.S. operations, rather than its global footprint, with most enhanced prudential standards applying only to FBOs with combined U.S. assets of at least $100 billion. FBOs with global assets of $100 billion or more and relatively limited U.S. presence would be subject to certain minimum standards, with the Federal Reserve Board relying primarily on compliance with comparable home-country prudential standards with respect to such FBOs.

If the Federal Reserve Board were to adopt final rules amending the enhanced prudential standards currently applicable to us, we cannot predict, at this time, the scope of any such final rules (including the extent to which such final rules would be consistent with the FBO Tailoring Proposal) or the effect that such rules would have on our activities, financial condition and/or results of operations.

Under Section 61913 of the Dodd-FrankBank Holding Company Act, as amended, also known as the so-called “Volcker Rule,” any insured depository institution;institution (subject to certain exceptions including for depository institutions that do not have, and are not controlled by a company that has, more than $10 billion in total consolidated assets and significant trading assets and liabilities), any insured depositorycompany that controls such an institution, holding company; anynon-U.S. bank with branches in the United States, such as Mizuho Bank;Bank, and any affiliate or subsidiary of such entities (each, a “banking entity”) is prohibited from engaging in proprietary trading or from investing in or sponsoring private equity or hedge funds, subject to certain limited exceptions. In December 2013, U.S. financial regulators approved final rules implementing Section 619the Volcker Rule, and established a deadline of July 21, 2015 for banking entities to conform their activities and investments to the requirements of the Dodd-Frank Act onfinal rules. In December 10, 2013. For2014, the Federal Reserve Board extended the conformance period to July 21, 2017 for investments in and relationships with certain funds that were in place prior to December 31, 2013,2013. In addition, prior to the expiration of the general conformance period, banking entities with investments in or relationships with certain “illiquid” funds” were permitted to seek an additionalone-time extension by the Federal Reserve has granted a setBoard of extensions that give banking entities until July 21, 2017up to comply with the Volcker Rule.five years. All investments in and relationships with funds covered by the Volcker Rule made after December 31, 2013 must have been divested or restructured by July 21, 2015.

The current regulatory environment in the United States may be impacted by future legislative developments, such as amendments to key provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act. On January 20, 2017, Mr. Donald J. Trump became President[For example, on May 24, 2018, the U.S. Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief and Consumer Protection Act (the “Reform Act”) was signed into law. Among other regulatory changes, the Reform Act amends various sections of the United States. The full scope of President Trump’s short-term legislative agenda is not yet fully known, but it may include certain deregulatory measures for the U.S. financial services industry,Dodd-Frank Act, including changes toby modifying the Volcker Rule capital requirementsto exempt depository institutions that do not have, and other aspectsare not controlled by a company that has, more than $10 billion in total consolidated assets or significant trading assets and liabilities, and by raising the threshold for automatic application of enhanced prudential standards to FBOs under the Dodd-Frank Act.. The ultimate consequences of the Dodd-Frank Act.Reform Act on us and our U.S. operations remain uncertain. The scope any additional future legislation is not possible to determine at this time, and we cannot predict what impact, if any, such future legislative developments will have on us if and when such legislation is enacted.

Cybersecurity and privacy developments in Europe and the U.S.

The European Union General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) replaced the existing E.U. Data Protection Directive and, as a regulation, took effect in all EU member states from May 25, 2018. Although a number of the existing principles for the protection of personal data remains, the GDPR is designed to harmonize data privacy laws across Europe and reshape the way organizations approach data privacy. The GDPR introduced new obligations and expanded its territorial reach. It applies to all organizations processing or holding personal data of EU ‘data subjects’ (regardless of the organization’s location) as well as to organizations outside the EU that offer goods or services in the EU, or that monitor the behavior of EU data subjects. Personal data is information that can be used to identify a natural person, including a name, a photo, an email address, or a computer IP address. Compliance with the GDPR requires companies to analyze and evaluate how they handle data in the ordinary course of their business, from processes to technology. It imposes a prescriptive approach to compliance requiring organizations to demonstrate and record compliance and to provide much more detailed information to data subjects regarding processing. EU data subjects need to be given full disclosure about how their personal data is used and stored. In that connection, consent must be explicit and companies must be in a position to delete information from their global systems permanently if consent were withdrawn. Financial regulators and data protection authorities throughout the EU will have significantly increased audit and investigatory powers under GDPR to probe how personal data is being used and processed. Penalties fornon-compliance are material. Serious breaches of GDPR include antitrust-like fines on companies of up to the greater of €20 million or 4% of global group turnover in the preceding year, regulatory action and reputational risk.

In the United States, federal and state regulators, including the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) and the NYDFS, have increasingly focused on cybersecurity risks and responses for regulated entities. For example, on March 1, 2017, the revised NYDFS cybersecurity regulation became effective. The

regulation applies to any person licensed or chartered by the NYDFS, including New York state-chartered banks and NYDFS-licensed branches ofnon-U.S. banks such as Mizuho Bank (USA) and the New York branch of Mizuho Bank, and requires each company to assess its specific risk profile periodically and design a program that addresses its risks “in a robust fashion”, including addressing risks posed by third-party service providers, training and retention of specialized staff to address cybersecurity risks, maintaining systems designed to reconstruct material financial transactions and complying with security requirements fornon-public information. Each covered entity must monitor its systems and networks and notify the superintendent of the NYDFS within 72 hours after it is determined that a material cybersecurity event has occurred. Senior management of the covered entity is required to file an annual certification confirming compliance with the NYDFS regulations beginning February 15, 2018. Similarly, FINRA has identified cybersecurity as a significant risk and will assess firms’ programs to mitigate those risks.

Disclosure Pursuant to Section 219 of the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act

Section 219 of the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012 (“Section 219”) added Section 13(r) to the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, requiring each SEC reporting issuer to disclose in its annual and, if applicable, quarterly reports whether it or any of its affiliates have knowingly engaged in specified activities, transactions or dealings relating to Iran or with the Government of Iran or certain designated persons or entities involved in terrorism or the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction during the period covered by such filing. Section 219 requires disclosure even of certain activities not prohibited by U.S. or other law and even if such activities were conducted outside the United States bynon-U.S. affiliates in compliance with local law.

Our affiliate Mizuho Bank is our only affiliate to have engaged in activity that is relevant for this purpose. Mizuho Bank maintains compliance policies and procedures to conform its operations to all applicable economic sanctions laws and regulations, and is increasing resources dedicated to this effort. In that context, and only after confirming that such transactions did not involve prohibited or sanctionable activity under U.S. or other economic sanctions,non-U.S. branches of Mizuho Bank engaged in a limited number of activities reportable under Section 219 during the period covered by this annual report, as described below. No U.S. branches of Mizuho Bank were involved in any of these activities.

Legacy guarantees

During a portion of the period covered by this disclosure, Mizuho Bank exited from one but remainswas a party to another of twoa legacy counter guaranteesguarantee that werewas opened in connection with activitiesactivity of its customerscustomer for the benefit of an Iranian banks.bank. When such guarantees werethe guarantee was entered into, the banksbank in question, which areis related to the

Government of Iran, had not been designated under U.S. Executive Orders (“E.O.”) 13224 or 13382, although they wereit was subsequently so designated. Mizuho Bank maintained these guaranteesthis guarantee post-designation only after confirming that such transactionsa transaction did not involve prohibited or sanctionable activity under U.S. or other economic sanctions. As contractual obligations, these guarantees cannotthis guarantee could not be exited by Mizuho Bank unilaterally. In the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017,2019, Mizuho Bank received fees of less than ¥1 million attributable to these guaranteesthis guarantee and earned net profits of less than that amount. Mizuho Bank continues to seek to terminateterminated the counter guarantee toin July 2018 before the extent permitted under applicable laws.issuance of E.O. 13846.

Activities through correspondent banking accounts

In the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017,2019, Mizuho Bank conducted a limited number of fund transfers through accounts it maintains for or at a limited number of Iranian banks related to the Government of Iran and a bank designated under E.O. 13224, or through other correspondent banking accounts on behalf of such Iranian banks. These transfers were mainly associated with requests by our customers after the relaxation of applicable sanctions pursuant to the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action.Action and prior to the fullre-imposition of such U.S. sanctions on November 5, 2018. Mizuho Bank has policies and procedures to process transfers through these accounts only after confirming that such transactions do not involve prohibited or sanctionable activity under

U.S. or other economic sanctions and obtaining licenses issued by Japan’s Ministry of Finance where necessary. Estimated gross revenue to Mizuho Bank in the fiscal year ended March 31, 20172019 attributable to fees for these activities was less than ¥10¥12 million, with a net profit of less than that amount. Mizuho Bank intends to continue engaging in this activity but will process transfers through these accounts only under the limited circumstances where Mizuho Bank believes the transfer would conform to its compliance policies and procedures, applicable international sanctions laws, and after obtaining a license issued by Japan’s Ministry of Finance where necessary.

Other Jurisdictions

Our operations elsewhere in the world are subject to regulation and control by local supervisory authorities, including local central banks.

4.C. Organizational Structure

The following diagram shows our basic corporate structure as of March 31, 2017:2019:

LOGO

LOGO

Note:

(1)

JTC Holdings, in which we have a 27.0% equity interest, is an equity-method affiliate of ours.

The following table sets forth information with respect to our principal consolidated subsidiaries as of March 31, 2017:2019:

 

Name

 Country of
organization
 Main business Proportion of
ownership
interest
(%)
 Proportion of
voting
interest
(%)
  

Country of
organization

 

Main business

 Proportion of
ownership
interest
(%)
 Proportion of
voting
interest
(%)
 

Domestic

        

Mizuho Bank, Ltd.

  Japan   Banking   100.0  100.0 Japan Banking 100.0 100.0

Mizuho Trust & Banking Co., Ltd.

  Japan   Trust and banking   100.0  100.0 Japan Trust and banking 100.0 100.0

Mizuho Securities Co., Ltd.

  Japan   Securities   95.8  95.8 Japan Securities 95.8 95.8

Mizuho Research Institute Ltd.

  Japan   Research and consulting   98.6  98.6 Japan Research and consulting 98.6 98.6

Mizuho Information & Research Institute, Inc.

  Japan   Information technology   91.5  91.5 Japan 

Information technology

 91.5 91.5

Asset Management One Co., Ltd.

  Japan   Investment management   70.0  51.0 Japan Investment management 70.0 51.0

Trust & Custody Services Bank, Ltd.

  Japan   Trust and banking   54.0  54.0

Mizuho Private Wealth Management Co., Ltd.

  Japan   Consulting   100.0  100.0 Japan 

Consulting

 100.0 100.0

Mizuho Credit Guarantee Co., Ltd.

  Japan   Credit guarantee   100.0  100.0 Japan Credit guarantee 100.0 100.0

Mizuho Realty Co., Ltd.

  Japan   Real estate agency   100.0  100.0 Japan Real estate agency 100.0 100.0

Mizuho Factors, Limited

  Japan   Factoring   100.0  100.0 Japan Factoring 100.0 100.0

Simplex Investment Advisors Inc.

  Japan   Holding company   100.0  100.0

Mizuho Realty One Co., Ltd.

 Japan Holding company 100.0 100.0

Defined Contribution Plan Services Co., Ltd.

 

 

Japan

 

 

 

Pension plan-related
business

 
 

 

 

60.0

 

 

60.0

 

Japan

 

Pension plan-related business

 

 

60.0

 

 

60.0

Mizuho-DL Financial Technology Co., Ltd.

 

 

Japan

 

 

 

Application and
Sophistication of
Financial Technology

 
 
 

 

 

60.0

 

 

60.0

 

Japan

 

Application and Sophistication of Financial Technology

 

 

60.0

 

 

60.0

UC Card Co., Ltd.

  Japan   Credit card   51.0  51.0 Japan Credit card 51.0 51.0

J.Score CO., LTD

 Japan Lending 50.0 50.0

Mizuho Trust Systems Company, Limited

 

 

Japan

 

 

 


Subcontracted
calculation services,
software
development

 
 
 
 

 

 

50.0

 

 

50.0

 

Japan

 

Subcontracted calculation services, software development

 

 

50.0

 

 

50.0

Mizuho Capital Co., Ltd.

  Japan   Venture capital   50.0  50.0 Japan 

Venture capital

 50.0 50.0

Overseas

        

Mizuho Americas LLC

  U.S.A.   Holding company   100.0  100.0 USA 

Holding company

 100.0 100.0

Mizuho Bank (China), Ltd.

  China   Banking   100.0  100.0 China 

Banking

 100.0 100.0

Mizuho International plc

  U.K.   Securities and banking   100.0  100.0 UK 

Securities and banking

 100.0 100.0

Mizuho Securities Asia Limited

  China   Securities   100.0  100.0 China 

Securities

 100.0 100.0

Banco Mizuho do Brasil S.A.

  Brazil   Banking   100.0  100.0

Mizuho Securities USA LLC

  U.S.A.   Securities   100.0  100.0 USA 

Securities

 100.0 100.0

Mizuho Bank Europe N.V.

  Netherlands   Banking and securities   100.0  100.0 Netherlands 

Banking and securities

 100.0 100.0

Banco Mizuho do Brasil S.A.

 Brazil 

Banking

 100.0 100.0

Mizuho Trust & Banking (Luxembourg) S.A.

  Luxembourg   Trust and banking   100.0  100.0 Luxembourg 

Trust and banking

 100.0 100.0

Mizuho Bank (USA)

  U.S.A.   Banking   100.0  100.0 USA 

Banking and trust

 100.0 100.0

Mizuho Bank (Switzerland) Ltd

  Switzerland   Trust and banking   100.0  100.0

Mizuho Trust & Banking Co. (USA)

  U.S.A.   Trust and banking   100.0  100.0

Mizuho Capital Markets Corporation

  U.S.A.   Derivatives   100.0  100.0

Mizuho Securities Europe GmbH

 Germany 

Securities

 100.0 100.0

Mizuho Capital Markets LLC

 USA 

Derivatives

 100.0 100.0

PT. Bank Mizuho Indonesia

  Indonesia   Banking   99.0  99.0 Indonesia 

Banking

 99.0 99.0

4.D. Property, Plant and Equipment

The following table shows the breakdown of our premises and equipment at cost as of March 31, 20162018 and 2017:2019:

 

  At March 31,   As of March 31, 
  2016   2017   2018   2019 
  (in millions of yen)   

 

(in millions of yen)

 

Land

  ¥552,205   ¥575,054   ¥566,040   ¥563,032 

Buildings

   827,458    807,312    811,911    826,781 

Equipment and furniture

   463,205    485,407    484,102    472,186 

Leasehold improvements

   88,195    93,967    97,066    97,508 

Construction in progress

   20,656    23,093    25,849    37,174 

Software

   1,086,124    1,308,292    1,463,786    1,366,481 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   3,037,843    3,293,125    3,448,754    3,363,162 

Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization

   1,199,853    1,251,852    1,332,570    1,462,210 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Premises and equipment—net

  ¥1,837,990   ¥2,041,273   ¥2,116,184   ¥1,900,952 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Our head office is located at 1-5-5 Otemachi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan. The headquarter buildings of Mizuho Financial Group and Mizuho Bank are eachbuilding is leased from a third party.

The total area of land related to our material office and other properties atas of March 31, 20172019 was approximately 697,000650,000 square meters for owned land and approximately 15,00013,000 square meters for leased land.

Our owned land and buildings are primarily used by our branches. Most of the buildings and land owned by us are free from material encumbrances.

 

ITEM 4A.

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 5.    OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with “Item 3.A. Key Information—Selected Financial Data,” “Selected Statistical Data” and our consolidated financial statements, including the notes thereto, included elsewhere in this annual report.

Table of Contents for Item 5.

 

   Page 

Overview

   5157 

Critical Accounting Estimates

   5965 

Operating Results

   6269 

Business Segments Analysis

73

Geographical Segment Analysis

   78 

Financial ConditionGeographical Segment Analysis

   8184 

LiquidityFinancial Condition

   9286 

Capital AdequacyLiquidity

   9497 

Off-balance-sheet ArrangementsCapital Adequacy

   98 

Off-balance-sheet Arrangements

104

Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations

   99105 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

   99105 

Reconciliation with Japanese GAAP

   100106 

Overview

The Mizuho Group

We provide a broad range of financial services in domestic and overseas markets. The principal activities and subsidiaries are the following:

 

Mizuho Bank provides a wide range of financial products and services mainly in relation to deposits, lending and exchange settlement to individuals, SMEs,small andmedium-sized enterprises (“SME”s), large corporations, financial institutions, public sector entities and foreign corporations, including foreign subsidiaries of Japanese corporations;

 

Mizuho Trust & Banking provides products and services related to trust, real estate, securitization and structured finance, pension and asset management and stock transfer agency; and

 

Mizuho Securities provides full-line securities services to individuals, corporations, financial institutions and public sector entities.

We also provide products and services such as those related to trust and custody, asset management, private banking, research services, information technology-related services and advisory services for financial institutions through various subsidiaries and affiliates.

In April 2016, we introduced anin-house company system based on the group’s diverse customer segments. The aim of this system is to leverage our strengths and competitive advantage, which is the seamless integration of our banking, trust and securities functions under a holding company structure, to speedily provide high-quality financial services that closely match customer needs.

In October 2016, with a view to strengthening the respective asset management businesses, we and TheDai-ichi Life Insurance Company, Limited integrated the asset management functions of both groups, namely, DIAM Co., Ltd., the asset management function of Mizuho Trust & Banking, Mizuho Asset Management Co., Ltd. and Shinko Asset Management Co., Ltd., and formed a new company named Asset Management One Co., Ltd., a consolidated subsidiary of Mizuho Financial Group.

For a further discussion of our business and group organization, see “Item 4.B. Information on the Company—Business Overview.”

Principal Sources of Income and Expenses

Net Interest Income

Net interest income arises principally from the lending anddeposit-taking and securities investment activities of our banking subsidiaries and is a function of:

 

the amount of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities;

the average interest rate spread (the difference between the average yield of interest earned on interest-earning assets and the average rate of interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities); and

 

the general level of interest rates.

Principal items constituting interest-earning assets include loans, investments, trading account assets, receivables under resale agreements and receivables under securities borrowing transactions. Principal items constituting interest-bearing liabilities include deposits, trading account liabilities, short-term borrowings (such as payables under repurchase agreements and payables under securities lending transactions) and long-term debt.

Provision (Credit) for Loan Losses

Provision (credit) for loan losses is charged against (or credited to) income to keep the allowance for loan losses at a level that is appropriate to absorb probable losses inherent in the credit portfolio. For a description of the approach and methodology used to establish the allowance for loan losses, see “—Financial Condition—Allowance for Loan Losses.”

Noninterest Income

Noninterest income consists mainly of fee and commission, investment gains (losses)—net, trading account gains (losses)—net and foreign exchange gains (losses)—net.

Fee and commission include the following:

 

fee and commission from securities-related business, including brokerage fee and commission related to securities underwriting, feethe execution of customer transactions and sales commission related toof investment trusts and individual annuities and other securities-related activities;asset-based revenue, which mainly include fees received from investment trust management companies in return for administration services, such as record keeping services, of investment trusts;

 

fee and commission from deposits and lending business, which consist mostly of fee and commission related to our loan businesses, including fees related to the arrangement of syndicated loans and other financing transactions such as arrangement fees related to managementbuy-out transactions and fees related to deposits such as account transfer charges;

 

fee and commission from remittance business, including service charges for domestic and international funds transfers and collections;

 

fee and commission from asset management business, including investment trust management fees and investment advisory fees for investment trusts;

fee and commission from trust-related business, including trust fees earned primarily through fiduciary asset management and administration servicesservice for corporate pension plans and investment funds;funds and other trust-related fees such as brokerage commissions of real estate property, sales commissions of beneficial interest in real estate trust and charges for stock transfer agent services;

fee and commission from agency business, including administration service fees related to our agency business such as Japan’s principal public lottery program and revenue from standing proxy services; and

 

fees for other customer services, including fees related to our agency businesses,various revenues such as administration fees related to Japan’s principal public lottery program, as well as guarantee fees, sales commissions of life insurance, service charges for electronic banking, financial advisory fees and others.service charges for software development.

Investment gains (losses)—net primarily include net gains and losses on sales of marketable securities, such as equity and bond investments. In addition, impairment losses are recognized when management concludes that declines in the fair value of investments are other-than-temporary.

Trading account gains (losses)—net include gains and losses from transactions undertaken for trading purposes, including both market making for customers and proprietary trading, or transactions through which we seek to capture gains arising from short-term changes in market value. Trading account gains (losses)—net also include gains and losses related to changes in the fair value of derivatives and other financial instruments not eligible for hedge accounting under U.S. GAAP that are utilized to offset mainly interest rate risk related to our various assets and liabilities, as well as gains and losses related to changes in the fair value of foreign currency-denominatedavailable-for-sale debt securities that are elected for fair value treatment under ASC 825. For further information on the fair value option, see note 28 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.reported as Trading securities.

Foreign exchange gains (losses)—net mainly include translation gains and losses related to our foreign currency-denominated assets and liabilities and gains and losses related to foreign exchange trading activities, including market making for customers and proprietary trading.

Noninterest Expenses

Noninterest expenses primarily include salaries and employee benefits, general and administrative expenses, occupancy expenses and fee and commission expenses.

Salaries and employee benefits include expenses incurred for salaries, bonuses and compensation to directors and employees. They also include expenses related to pension and other employee retirement benefit plans.

The principal items included in general and administrative expenses are amortization of software, tax expenses such as consumption tax and property tax that are not income taxes and other expenses, including premiums for deposit insurance.

The principal items included in occupancy expenses are expenses related to premises and equipment, including depreciation, losses on disposal and lease expenses.

The principal items included in fee and commission expenses are fee and commission expenses for remittance services, which mainly include commission expenses paid in connection with remittance transactions and the securities-related businesses, which mainly include transactions costs such as brokerage fees paid.

Operating Environment

We operate principally in Japan, and our performance has generally tracked the macro economy of Japan.

As to the recent economic environment, the gradual recovery in the global economy has continued, while weaknessesdriven by the strong expansion of the United States’ economy. On the other hand, the Chinese and European economies showed a clear slowdown due mainly to the influence of trade friction between the United States and China.

In Japan, although the economy continued to recover, exports declined due to weak overseas economies and production remained weak. Employment conditions have been favorable, and consumer spending maintained a gradual recovery trend. The Bank of Japan continues “quantitative and qualitative monetary easing with yield curve control” to achieve the price stability target of 2%, but it is indicated that it will be difficult to achieve this target by the end of the 2020 fiscal year.

In the United States, the economy continued its steady expansion due to such factors as tax cuts and increases in government spending. However, there was a downturn in business confidence in the recoverymanufacturing industry due primarily to the impact of the trade friction with such countries as China. While the unemployment rate remained low and wage level growth has accelerated somewhat, spillover effects on prices have been seenyet to be

observed. The Federal Reserve Board (“FRB”) has changed its stance regarding interest rates from one with an inclination towards rate increases to a morewait-and-see stance and announced their planned suspension of the shrinking of their balance sheet.

In Europe, the economy remained weak. Business confidence showed a clear downturn mainly in the manufacturing industry. The European Central Bank (“ECB”) suspended new assets purchases but maintained its policy rate as uncertainties such as concerns regarding Brexit increase.

In Asia, the Chinese economy remained stagnant. In China, export growth slowed rapidly due mainly to the impact of trade friction between the United States and China.

In emerging countries, the economies generally continued to recover. However, in some regions. Thiscountries with current account deficits, the risk of cash outflows remained amid concerns regarding uncertainty in U.S. trade policies and the Chinese economy.

As for the future outlook of the global economy, recovery is expected to continue, particularly in the United States, but it remainsis necessary to monitor increasing uncertainties such risks of a downturn as the United States’ policy direction under its new presidency,developments in U.S. trade policies, political concerns in Europe, the economic outlook for China and increasing geopolitical risks. In the United States, the economy continued to recover due to such factors as generally improved employment conditions, steady consumer spending and increase in exports. It is expected that the gradual recovery in the economy will continue, supported by policies under the new presidency. However, increasing uncertainty about the effect of monetary and trade policies under the new administration requires continued monitoring. In Europe, the economy continued to recover gradually as consumer spending and exports picked up. Although the gradual economic recovery of the region is expected to continue, the political situation in Europe, including negotiations regarding the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union, elections in some countries and the effect of debt problems in southern Europe require further monitoring. In Asia, the economy of China remained stable, due partly to the effect of government policies. This economic condition in China is likely to continue with the successive support through fiscal policies, including investment in infrastructure and tax reductions. The economies in emerging countries are picking up because of China’s enduring economy and increase in resource prices. In the coming year, it is expected that the growth of their

economies will remain gradual due to such factors of concern as the depreciation of currencies in emerging countries and the increasing pressure of capital outflows. In Japan, following the improvement of overseas economies, the economy has gradually been recovering mainlygeopolitical risks in the areas of exports and business investment. As for the future outlook of the Japanese economy, it is expected to continue on its gradual recovery path, with the improved environment for exports and the effect of economic measures by the government. However, increasing uncertainty in overseas economies requires continued monitoring.Middle East.

Key indicators of Japanese economic conditions in recent periods include the following:

 

The following chart shows the growth rates of Japan’s gross domestic product on ayear-on-year basis and Japan’s core nationwide consumer price indices from the first quarter of 20142016 through the first quarter of 2017:2019:

 

LOGOLOGO

Japan’s real gross domestic product on ayear-on-year basis decreased by 0.5% in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015 and increased by 1.2%0.9%, 1.9% and 0.7% in each of the fiscal years ended March 31, 20162017, 2018 and 2017.2019, respectively. Japan’s real gross domestic product on a quarterly basis, compared to the corresponding period of the previous year, decreased consecutively from the second quarter of calendar year 2014 through the first quarter of calendar year 2015 and increased consecutively from the secondfirst quarter of calendar year 2015 through the first quarter of calendar year 2017.2019. Japan’s core nationwide consumer price index increased by 2.8% in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015, was unchanged in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 and decreased by 0.2% in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017.2017, increased by 0.7% and 0.8% in the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018 and 2019, respectively.

 

In September 2016, the Bank of Japan decided to introduce “quantitative and qualitative monetary easing with yield curve control” by strengthening theits two previous policy frameworks, namely “quantitative and qualitative monetary easing (“QQE”)” and “QQE with a negative interest rate.” The new policy framework consists of two major components: (1) “yield curve control” in which the Bank of Japan will control short-term and long-term interest rates; and (2) an “inflation-overshooting commitment” in which the Bank of Japan commits itself to expandingexpand the monetary base until theyear-on-year rate of increase in the observed consumer price index exceeds the price stability target of 2% and stays above the target in a stable manner. Under the new policy framework, the Bank of Japan decided to set the guideline for market operations under which, regarding short-term interest rates, the Bank of Japan will apply a negative interest rate of minus 0.1% to certain excess balances in current accounts held by financial institutions at the Bank of Japan, while for long-term interest rates, it would purchase Japanese government bonds to control long-term interest rates so that the yield of10-year Japanese government bonds will remain at around 0%. In addition, the Bank of Japan decided to introduce the following new tools of market operations so as to control the yield curve smoothly: (i) outright purchases of Japanese government bonds with yields designated by the Bank of Japan; and (ii) fixed-rate funds-supplying operations for a period of up to ten years (thereby extending the longest maturity of the operation of one year).

In July 2018, the Bank of Japan decided to strengthen its commitment to achieving its price stability target by introducing forward guidance for policy rates, and to enhance the sustainability of “quantitative and qualitative monetary easing with yield curve control.” In its forward guidance, the Bank of Japan stated its intention to maintain the current extremely low levels of short-term and long-term interest rates for an extended period of time, taking into account uncertainties regarding economic activity and prices, including the effects of the consumption tax hike scheduled to take place in October 2019. The Bank of Japan also indicated its aim to ease the yield curve, stating that it would purchase Japanese government bonds so that the yield of10-year Japanese government bonds will remain at around 0%, although it might move upward and downward to some extent mainly depending on developments in economic activity and prices, and the Bank of Japan would purchase the Japanese government bonds in a flexible manner with regard to the purchase amount. In addition, the Bank of Japan decided to reduce the size of the excess balances in financial institutions’ current account to which a negative interest rate is applied under the condition that yield curve control can be conducted appropriately.

In April 2019, the Bank of Japan decided upon the clarification of forward guidance for policy rates and implementation of measures contributing to the continuation of powerful monetary easing, including the expansion of eligible collateral for the bank’s provision of credit, with a view to making clearer its policy stance to persistently continue with powerful monetary easing. The Bank of Japan stated its intention to maintain the current extremely low levels of short-term and long-term interest rates for an extended period of time, at least through around spring 2020, taking into account uncertainties regarding economic activity and prices, including developments in overseas economies and the effects of the scheduled consumption tax hike.

the target in a stable manner. Under the new policy framework, the Bank of Japan decided to set the guideline for market operations under which, regarding short-term interest rates, the Bank of Japan will apply a negative interest rate of minus 0.1% to certain excess balance in current accounts held by financial institutions at the Bank of Japan, while for long-term interest rates, it would purchase Japanese government bonds so that the yield of10-year Japanese government bonds will remain around 0% to control long-term interest rates. In addition, the Bank of Japan decided to introduce the following new tools of market operations so as to control the yield curve smoothly: (i) outright purchases of Japanese government bonds with yields designated by the Bank of Japan; and (ii) fixed-rate funds-supplying operations for a period of up to ten years (extending the longest maturity of the operation of one year).

The following chart shows movements in long-term interest rates from January 20142016 to May 2017,2019, represented by the yield on newly issued10-year Japanese government bonds, and in short-term interest rates during the same period, represented by the uncollateralized overnight call rate used in the interbank market:

 

LOGOLOGO

 

According to Teikoku Databank, a Japanese research institution, there were 9,044 corporate bankruptcies in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015, involving approximately ¥1.9 trillion in total liabilities, 8,408 corporate bankruptcies in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016, involving approximately ¥1.9 trillion in total liabilities, and 8,153 corporate bankruptcies in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, involving approximately ¥1.9 trillion in total liabilities, 8,285 corporate bankruptcies in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018, involving approximately ¥2.6 trillion in total liabilities, and 8,057 corporate bankruptcies in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019, involving approximately ¥1.6 trillion in total liabilities. The number of corporate bankruptcies decreasedshowed a decrease from athe previous year earlier for the eighth consecutive year, butfirst time in two years, which was the fewest in ten years since the financial crisis in 2008. The amount of total liabilities increaseddecreased by approximately ¥0.04¥1.0 trillion from the previous fiscal year.

The following chart shows the daily closing price of the Nikkei Stock Average from January 20142016 to May 2017:2019:

 

LOGOLOGO

The Nikkei Stock Average, which is an average of the price of 225 stocks listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange, increased by 29.5% to ¥19,206.99 during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015, followed by a 12.7% decrease to ¥16,758.67 during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 and a 12.8% increase to ¥18,909.26 during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017.2017, followed by a 13.5% increase to ¥21,454.30 during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018 and a 1.2% decrease to ¥21,205.81 during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019. Thereafter, the Nikkei Stock Average increaseddecreased to ¥19,650.57¥20,601.19 as of May 31, 2017.2019.

 

The following chart shows the yen/dollar spot rate of 5 p.m. Tokyo time published by the Bank of Japan from January 20142016 to May 2017:2019:

 

LOGOLOGO

The yen to U.S. dollar spot exchange rate, according to the Bank of Japan, was ¥120.21 to $1.00 as of March 31, 2015, ¥112.43 to $1.00 as of March 31, 2016, and ¥111.80 to $1.00 as of March 31, 2017.2017, ¥106.19 to $1.00 as of March 30, 2018, and ¥110.75 to $1.00 as of March 29, 2019. Thereafter, the yen strengthened to ¥110.96¥108.78 to $1.00 as of May 31, 2017.2019.

 

According to the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism of Japan, housing starts in Japan decreased by 10.8% in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015, increased by 4.6% and 5.8% in the fiscal years ended March 31, 20162017, decreased by 2.8% in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.increased by 0.7% in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019.

According to the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism of Japan, the average published housing land prices in Japan decreased by 0.4% and 0.2% in calendar years 2014 and 2015, respectively, and was unchanged in calendar year 2016.2016 and increased by 0.3% and 0.6% in calendar year 2017 and 2018, respectively.

Capital Improvements

All yen figures and percentages in this subsection are truncated.

We have been implementing disciplined capital management by pursuing the optimal balance between strengthening of stable capital base and steady returns to shareholders as described below.

Strengthening of Stable Capital Base

In the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017,2019, we strengthened our capital base mainly as a result of earning ¥603.5¥96.5 billion of profit attributable to owners of parent (under Japanese GAAP).

With respect to redemptions of previously issued securities, since April 2016,2018, we have redeemed various securities that are eligible Tier 1/Tier 2regulatory capital instruments subject tophase-out arrangements under Basel III upon their respective initial optional redemption dates or their respective maturity dates. With respect to Tier 1 capital, in June 2016,2018 and June 2019, we redeemed $600.0 million¥274.5 billion and ¥400.0¥303.0 billion ofnon-dilutive Tier 1 preferred securities issued by our overseas special purpose companies in March 2006January 2008 and January 2007,July 2008, respectively. In addition, on July 1, 2016, we acquired ¥75.1 billion of eleventh series class XI preferred stock, in respect of which a request for acquisition was not made by June 30, 2016 and delivered 265,433,368 shares of our common stock, pursuant to Article 20, Paragraph 1 of our articles of incorporation and a provision in the terms and conditions of the preferred stock concerning mandatory acquisition in exchange for common stock. On July 13, 2016, we cancelled all of our treasury shares of eleventh series class XI preferred stock. With respect to Tier 2 capital, in November 2016,June 2019, we redeemed ¥60.0¥54.0 billion of dated subordinated bonds issued by our

subsidiary bank.bank in June 2009. In April 2017,addition, we redeemed ¥50.0have decided to redeem ¥20.0 billion of dated subordinated bonds with a write-down feature that are BaselIII-eligible Tier 2 capital instruments in July 2019, which were issued by our subsidiary bank.Mizuho Financial Group in July 2014.

With respect to new issuances of Additional Tier 1 capital, new issuances, in July 2016,2018, we issued ¥460.0¥350.0 billion of Additional Tier 1 perpetual subordinated bonds with optional-redemption clause and write-down clause that are BaselIII-eligible Additional Tier 1 capital instruments through public offerings to wholesale investors in Japan. With respect to new issuances of Tier 2 capital, new issuances, in June 2016, January 2017 and June 2017,2018, we issued ¥155.0 billion, ¥180.0¥40.0 billion and ¥114.0¥70.0 billion respectively, of dated subordinated bonds with a write-down feature that are BaselIII-eligible Tier 2 capital instruments through public offerings to wholesale and retail investors, respectively, in Japan. In June 2019, we issued ¥90.0 billion of dated subordinated bonds with a write-down feature that are BaselIII-eligible Tier 2 capital instruments through public offerings to wholesale investors in Japan.

Our Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio under Basel III was 10.50%12.49% and 11.34%12.76% as of March 31, 20162018 and 2017,2019, respectively.

Steady Returns to Shareholders

Annual cash dividends for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20172019 were ¥7.5 per share of common stock (including interim dividend payments of ¥3.75 per share), which was the same amount as the annual cash dividend per share offor the previous fiscal year.

We continuously consider the optimal balance between strengthening of stable capital base and steady returns to shareholders. We will comprehensively consider the business environment such as the Mizuho group’s business results, profit base, capital, and domestic and international regulation trends such as the Basel framework and determine cash dividend payments for each term.

Business Trends

See “Item 4.B. Information on the Company—Business Overview,” “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Operating Results” and “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects —FinancialProspects—Financial Condition.”

Others

Strengthening our Research & Consulting FunctionsImplementation of the Next-generation IT Systems

In April 2016, in order to provide customers with solutionsSince June 11, 2018, Mizuho Bank and support our aim of becoming a “financial services consulting group,” we consolidated our research and consulting functions into “One Think-tank,” and we established the new Research & Consulting Unit. The Unit is made up of Mizuho Bank’s Industry Research Department, Mizuho Trust & Banking’s Consulting Department, Mizuho Securities’ ResearchBanking have been engaging in a multi-stage process of migration to, and Consulting Unit, Mizuho Information & Research Institute, Mizuho Research Institutethe implementation of, our next-generation IT systems, including accounting system. As of July 5, 2019, we have completed eight out of the nine required phases.

New Share Issuance of LINE Credit Corporation andMizuho-DL Financial Technology. In addition to research and analysis on Establishment of a wide range of topics ranging from macroeconomics to industry trends, the research function offers policies based on such research and analysis.

Establishing Our U.S. Bank Holding CompanyJoint Venture

In July 2016, with consideration ofNovember 2018, LINE Corporation (“LINE”) and we agreed to executing new share issuance by LINE Credit Corporation (“LINE Credit”) through third-party allotment to the Federal Reserve Board’s proposed rule that came into effect on July 1, 2016 regarding the operations of foreign banking organizations with U.S. operations, we established a U.S. Bank Holding Companyparties’ respective group companies, namely LINE Financial Corporation (“BHC”LINE Financial”), Mizuho Americas, which is wholly ownedBank and Orient Corporation (“Orico”). In May 2019, this third-party allotment was completed and resulted in 51% of the voting rights held by LINE Financial, 34% held by Mizuho Bank and brought its primary U.S.-based banking, securities15% held by Orico. LINE Credit will seek to establish an innovative own-scoring platform and institutional custodyprovide useful loan services (trust banking) entities together under the holding company.

Creation of New Business based on FinTechto customers.

In September 2016,May 2019, LINE and we also established a joint venture through their respective subsidiaries, LINE Financial and Mizuho Bank. Subject to any required regulatory approval, the joint venture will start preparation

to establish a new bank. By fully utilizing the large customer base and sophisticated user interface and user experience of LINE and our financial expertise, the new bank, which will be linked to the LINE mobile application, will seek to provide user-friendly smartphone-based banking services.

Signing of the Capital and Business Alliance Agreement between Mizuho Bank and SoftBank Corp. agreed to set up a 50/50 joint company to provide FinTech-based personal lending services. Afterwards, in November 2016,IBJ Leasing Company

In February 2019, Mizuho Bank and SoftBank announced that they establishedIBJ Leasing Company, Limited (“IBJ Leasing”) adopted a resolution to enter into a capital and business alliance and executed a capital and business alliance agreement. Through the joint company named “J. Score CO., LTD.”subscription for the entire shares of common stock of IBJ Leasing to be issued by IBJ Leasing through third-party allotment and will begin operations as Japan’s first score-based lending businessthe share transfers from existing shareholders by off-market negotiated transactions conducted in March 2019, together with the first halfshares we had already owned, we currently hold 23.5% of the fiscal year ending March 31, 2018. The establishmentshares of the company representscommon stock of IBJ Leasing, which makes IBJ Leasing our enhanced efforts in the field of FinTech, through which we aim to develop a new approach to lending and offer customers ever more attractive financial services.equity-method affiliate.

Improvement for Advanced and Efficient Operations Utilizing Blockchain

Mizuho Bank, Fujitsu Limited and Fujitsu Laboratories Ltd. jointly conducted an operational trial using blockchain technology and completed proof of concept. The goal was to enablelow-cost,low-risk cross-border securities transactions by building a system utilizing blockchain technology that can almost instantly share matched trade information in the post-trade process as data that cannot be tampered with, but without building a large-scale settlement system from scratch. This would thereby shorten the time from trade execution to final settlement from the previous three days to the same day.

In April 2017, we announced two joint projects to analyze the results of actual trade transactions conducted using blockchain technology with the aim of providing increased efficiency in the field of trade finance. In the first joint project, IBM Japan, Ltd., Mizuho Bank and we will work together to apply blockchain technology developed by IBM to actual trade transactions and analyze the results. In the second joint project, R3CEV LLC (“R3”), Cognizant Japan KK, Mizuho Bank and we will utilize a distributed ledger platform developed by R3 to conduct trace transactions to assess the possible implications and applications to trade finance. One of the key features of blockchain is the ability to quickly and securely share data among participants. We anticipate that the application of blockchain technology to trade transactions will enable the digitalization of the documents involved in trade finance as well as the fast and secure exchange of information. We also anticipate that this

system and platform will reduce the time and operational costs associated with trade transactions by simplifying the process of creating and exchanging documents, in addition to enabling all involved parties to share and view the most recent status of the transaction.

Signing of Memorandum of Understanding for the Integration of Trust Banks Specializing in Asset Administration Service

In March 2017, we, Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Holdings, Resona Bank and TheDai-ichi Life Insurance Company executed a memorandum of understanding to commence detailed analysis and negotiations in preparation for the management integration of Japan Trustee Services Bank and Trust & Custody Services Bank. The concentration of both companies’ managerial resources and expertise will have the benefit of scale, will realize more stable and higher quality operations, and aims for further growth in the domestic securities settlement market and contribute to the enhancement of the domestic investment chain. By meeting a wide variety of customer needs, the integrated company will aim to be the top trust bank specializing in asset administration services in Japan.

Disposing of Our Cross-shareholdings

Reflecting the potential impact on our financial position associated with the risk of stock price fluctuation, as a basic policy, unless we consider holdings to be meaningful, we will not hold the shares of other companies as cross-shareholdings. We promote cross-shareholdings disposal through initiatives to enhance capital efficiency by implementingin-house company return on equity as an internal performance indicator. OurUnder Japanese GAAP on an acquisition cost basis, our total Japanese stock portfolio (included within other securities which have readily determinable fair value and based on acquisition cost)value) as of March 31, 2015 was approximately ¥1,962.9 billion, and we have reduced such amount by ¥275.3¥543.0 billion as of March 31, 2017. As a result of the steady disposal, we were able to achieve our intermediate target of an approximately ¥250 billion reduction by March 31, 2017.2019.

Critical Accounting Estimates

Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report contains a summary of our significant accounting policies. These accounting policies are essential to understanding our financial condition and results of operations. Certain of these accounting policies require management to make critical accounting estimates that involve complex and subjective judgments and the use of assumptions, some of which may be for matters that are inherently uncertain and susceptible to change. Such critical accounting estimates are based on information available to us as of the date of the financial statements and could change from period to period. Critical accounting estimates could also involve estimates for which management could have reasonably used another estimate for the relevant accounting period. The use of different estimates could have a material impact on our financial condition and results of operations. The following is a discussion of significant accounting policies for which critical accounting estimates are used.

Allowance for Loan Losses and Allowance for Losses onOff-Balance-Sheet Instruments

The allowance for loan losses is based on management’s estimate of probable credit losses existing in our lending portfolio, and the allowance for losses onoff-balance-sheet instruments is based on management’s estimate of probable losses related tooff-balance-sheet arrangements such as guarantees and commitments to extend credit.

The allowance for loan losses is categorized and evaluated using the following methods:

 

  

Allowance based on ASC 310.In accordance with ASC 310, “Receivables” (“ASC 310”), we measure the value of specifically identified impaired loans based on the present value of expected cash flows discounted at the loans’ initial effective interest rate, or as a practical expedient, using the observable

market price or the fair value of collateral if the loan is collateral dependent, when it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. The collateral that we obtain for loans consists primarily of real estate or listed securities.estate. In obtaining the collateral, we evaluate the value of the collateral and its legal enforceability, and we also perform subsequent

re-evaluations at least once a year. As to collateral of loans that are collateral dependent, in the case of real estate, valuation is generally performed by an appraising subsidiary that is independent from our loan origination sections by using generally accepted valuation techniques such as (i) the replacement cost approach, or (ii) the sales comparison approach, or (iii) the income approach, although in the case of large real estate collateral, we generally engage third-party appraisers to perform the valuation. In the case of securities, such securities are typically those of listed companies and observable market prices are used for valuation. Management identifies impaired loans through the credit quality review process, in which the ability of borrowers to service their debt is assessed. The difference between our evaluation of the value of the impaired loan and its principal amount is the amount of the impairment which is recorded in the allowance for loan losses. Estimation of future cash flows is based on a comprehensive analysis of the borrower’s ability to service the debt, any progress made on the borrower’s rehabilitation program and the assumptions used therein.

 

  

Allowance based on ASC 450. In accordance with ASC 450, “Contingencies” (“ASC 450”), a formula-based allowance utilizing historical loss factors is applied to certain impaired loans which are aggregated for purposes of measuring impairment, groups of small balance, homogeneous loans and othernon-homogeneousloans that have not been identified as impaired.are collectively evaluated for impairment. The determination of expected losses is based on a statistical analysis of our historical default and loan loss data, as well as data from third-party sources. The estimation of the formula allowance is back-tested on a periodic basis by comparing the allowance with the actual results subsequent to the balance sheet date.

 

  

Adjustment of ASC 450 Allowance. In addition to the allowance for loan losses based on historical loss factors, the historical loss rate is adjusted, where appropriate, to reflect current factors, such as general economic and business conditions affecting key lending areas, credit quality trends, specific industry conditions and recent loss experience in the segments of the loan portfolio. For loans which are not deemed to be impaired under ASC 310 but to which special isolated risks apply, management assesses each loan individually to determine appropriate allowance amounts in lieu of mechanically applying the ASC 450 formula-based allowance.

We assess probable loss amounts for guarantees by using the same categories and evaluation methods as loans. We similarly assess probable loss amounts for loan commitments, taking into account the probability of drawdowns.

The determination of the allowance for loan losses and the allowance for losses onoff-balance-sheet instruments requires a great deal of judgment and the use of estimates as discussed above. Furthermore, information available at the time of the determination is limited, and it is not possible to eliminate uncertainty. Significant changes in any of the factors underlying our determination of the allowances could materially affect our financial condition and results of operations. For example, if our current judgment with respect to expected future cash flows differs from actual results, including as a result of an unexpected adverse change in the economic environment in Japan or a sudden and unanticipated failure of a large borrower, or if the value of collateral declines, we may need to increase the allowances with additional charges to earnings.

Impairment of Investment Securities

U.S. GAAP requires the recognition in earnings of an impairment loss on investment securities for a decline in fair value that is other-than-temporary. Management judgment is required in determining whether factors exist that indicate that an impairment loss has been incurred at the balance sheet date.

For debt securities, in the case where we have the intent to sell a debt security or more likely than not will be required to sell a debt security before the recovery of its amortized cost basis, the full amount of an other-than-temporary impairment loss is recognized through earnings. In these cases, we evaluate expected cash flows to be received and determine if a credit loss exists, and if so, the amount of an other-than-temporary impairment related to the credit loss is recognized in earnings, while the remaining decline in fair value is recognized in other comprehensive income, net of applicable taxes. For further details on the amount of the impairment losses on debt securities, see note 4 to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.

Our assessment of impairment involves analyzing risks and uncertainties resulting from market conditions and the condition of specific issuers or industries. Significant changes in any of these factors could significantly affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Valuation of Financial Instruments

ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurement” (“ASC 820”) specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques based on whether the inputs to those valuation techniques are observable or unobservable. The standard describes the following three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

 

Level 1

  Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 1 assets and liabilities include debt and equity securities and derivative contracts that are traded in an active exchange market.

Level 2

  Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. Level 2 assets and liabilities include debt securities with quoted prices that are traded less frequently than exchange-traded instruments. If no quoted market prices are available, the fair values of debt securities andover-the-counter derivative contracts in this category are determined using pricing models with inputs that are observable in the market or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3

  Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques.

For assets and liabilities classified in Level 1 and 2 of the hierarchy, where inputs are principally based on observable market data, there is less judgment or estimate in determining fair value, while the determination of fair value of Level 3 assets and liabilities involves more significant management judgments and estimates. For further information, including valuation methodologies and the use of management estimates and judgments in connection therewith, see note 28 to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.

Valuation of Deferred Income Taxes

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of (1) temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes, and (2) operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Pursuant to ASC 740, “Income Taxes” (“ASC 740”), a valuation allowance is recognized for any portion of the deferred tax assets where it is considered more likely than not that it will not be realized, based on projected future income, future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences andtax-planning strategies. Because we have not opted to be subject to consolidated taxation, deferred tax assets and liabilities, including the impact of a valuation allowance, are calculated separately for each member of our consolidated group.

The determination of a valuation allowance is an inherently uncertain process due to the use of projected future taxable income and subjective assessments in the effectiveness of our availabletax-planning strategies provided for under ASC 740. Variances in future projected operating performance or tax law changes could result in a change in the valuation allowance. Variances in the net unrealized gains onavailable-for-sale securities could also affect a change in the valuation allowance, because we consider the sales ofavailable-for-sale securities to be a qualifyingtax-planning strategy that is a possible source of future taxable income mainly with respect to our principal banking subsidiaries in Japan. Although we evaluate that thistax-planning strategy is prudent and feasible, it has limitations and risks such as the resulting decrease in net unrealized

gains onavailable-for-sale securities that are available to be utilized in the future. If we are not able to realize all or part of our net deferred tax assets in the future, an adjustment to our valuation allowance would be charged to income tax expense in the period when such determination is made, and this could materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Pension and Other Employee Benefit Plans

Mizuho Financial Group, its principal banking subsidiaries and certain other subsidiaries sponsor severance indemnities and pension plans, which provide defined benefits to retired employees. Periodic expense and accrued liabilities are computed based on a number of actuarial assumptions, including mortality, withdrawals, discount rates, expected long-term rates of return on plan assets and rates of increase in future compensation levels.

Actual results that differ from the assumptions are accumulated and amortized over future periods and therefore generally affect future pension expenses. While management believes that the assumptions used are appropriate, differences in actual experience or changes in assumptions may adversely affect pension expenses in the future.

In estimating the discount rates, we use interest rates on high-quality fixed-income government and corporate bonds. The durations of such bonds closely match those of the benefit obligations. Assumed discount rates are reevaluated at each measurement date.

The expected rate of return for each asset category is based primarily on various aspects of the long-term prospects for the economy that include historical performance and the market environment.

For further information on our pension and other employee benefits, see note 21 to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.

Accounting for Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill

Goodwill is tested for impairment at least annually or more often if events or circumstances indicate there may be impairment. For both the annual and interim tests, we have the option to either (a) perform a quantitative impairment test or (b) first perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, in which case we would perform the quantitative test. An impairment loss is recorded to the extent the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its estimated fair value. The estimated fair value of the reporting units is derived based on valuation techniques that we believe market participants would use for each of the reporting units. We generally determine the estimated fair value by utilizing a discounted cash flow methodology or methodologies that incorporateprice-to-book multiples of certain comparable companies. A change in the estimation could have an impact on impairment recognition because it is driven by hypothetical assumptions, such as projected earnings and discount rates. The estimation is based on information available to management at the time the estimation is made.

Intangible Assets

Intangible assets having indefinite useful lives are subject to impairment tests. An impairment loss is recorded to the extent that the carrying amount of the indefinite-lived intangible asset exceeds its estimated fair value. For intangible assets subject to amortization, an impairment loss is recorded if the carrying amount is not recoverable and exceeds its estimated fair value. Management judgment is required to evaluate whether indications of potential impairment have occurred, and to test intangible assets for impairment, if required.

Operating Results

The following table shows certain information as to our income, expenses and net income for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2015, 20162017, 2018 and 2017:2019:

 

  Fiscal years ended March 31,   Fiscal years ended March 31, 
  2015 2016   2017   2017   2018 2019 
  (in billions of yen)   (in billions of yen) 

Interest and dividend income

  ¥1,458  ¥1,500   ¥1509   ¥1,509   ¥1,762  ¥2,207 

Interest expense

   412   495    602    602    890  1,313 
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

Net interest income

   1,046   1,005    907    907    872  894 

Provision (credit) for loan losses

   (60  35    38    38    (126 32 
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

Net interest income after provision (credit) for loan losses

   1,106   970    869    869    998  862 

Noninterest income

   1,801   1,884    1,368    1,368    1,605  1,222 

Noninterest expenses

   1,639   1,657    1,757    1,757    1,764  1,999 
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

Income before income tax expense

   1,268   1,197    480    480    839  85 

Income tax expense

   438   347    91    91    237  9 
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

Net income

   830   850    389    389    602  76 

Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

   27   —      27    27    24  (9
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

Net income attributable to MHFG shareholders

  ¥803  ¥850   ¥362   ¥362   ¥578  ¥85 
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

The following is a discussion of major components of our net income attributable to MHFG shareholders for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2015, 20162017, 2018 and 2017.2019.

Net Interest Income

The following table shows the average balances of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, interest amounts and the average interest rates on such assets and liabilities for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2015, 20162017, 2018 and 2017:2019:

 

 Fiscal years ended March 31,  Fiscal years ended March 31, 
 2015 2016 2017  2017 2018 2019 
 Average
balance
 Interest
amount
 Interest
rate
 Average
balance
 Interest
amount
 Interest
rate
 Average
balance
 Interest
amount
 Interest
rate
  Average
balance
 Interest
amount
 Interest
rate
 Average
balance
 Interest
amount
 Interest
rate
 Average
balance
 Interest
amount
 Interest
rate
 
 (in billions of yen, except percentages)  (in billions of yen, except percentages) 

Domestic:

                  

Interest-bearing deposits in other banks

 ¥15,900  ¥20   0.12 ¥29,485  ¥30   0.10 ¥37,389  ¥27   0.07 ¥37,389  ¥27  0.07 ¥39,812  ¥27  0.07 ¥38,914  ¥26  0.07

Call loans and funds sold, and receivables under resale agreements and securities borrowing transactions

  4,771   8   0.17   4,309   10   0.22   5,079   18   0.35  5,079  18  0.35  5,283  23  0.43  6,201  32  0.51 

Trading account assets

  6,755   32   0.47   5,262   16   0.31   4,408   27   0.62  4,408  27  0.62  4,654  50  1.07  5,930  71  1.19 

Investments

  31,690   127   0.40   25,625   88   0.34   20,357   78   0.38  20,357  78  0.38  21,267  97  0.46  20,109  137  0.68 

Loans

  54,207   593   1.09   52,866   565   1.07   53,930   510   0.95  53,930  510  0.95  58,049  511  0.88  55,897  531  0.95 
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Total interest-earning assets

  113,323   780   0.69   117,547   709   0.60   121,163   660   0.54  121,163  660  0.54  129,065  708  0.55  127,051  797  0.63 
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Deposits

  77,126   50   0.06   81,090   60   0.07   83,293   51   0.06  83,293  51  0.06  90,078  60  0.07  87,168  94  0.11 

Short-term borrowings(1)

  17,342   24   0.14   15,139   22   0.15   14,177   27   0.19  14,177  27  0.19  13,678  43  0.31  14,011  69  0.49 

Trading account liabilities

  2,629   14   0.52   2,092   13   0.61   1,697   14   0.82  1,697  14  0.82  1,454  27  1.87  1,735  34  1.93 

Long-term debt

  11,727   175   1.49   14,236   176   1.23   14,523   178   1.22  14,523  178  1.22  13,032  197  1.51  12,285  217  1.77 
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Total interest-bearing liabilities

  108,824   263   0.24   112,557   271   0.24   113,690   270   0.24  113,690  270  0.24  118,242  327  0.28  115,199  414  0.36 
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Net

  4,499   517   0.45   4,990   438   0.36   7,473   390   0.30  7,473  390  0.30  10,823  381  0.27  11,852  383  0.27 
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Foreign:

                  

Interest-bearing deposits in other banks

  5,689   29   0.51   6,639   38   0.57   7,671   48   0.63  7,671  48  0.63  8,363  94  1.13  5,951  95  1.59 

Call loans and funds sold, and receivables under resale agreements and securities borrowing transactions

  10,862   33   0.30   10,465   50   0.48   9,213   79   0.85  9,213  79  0.85  9,251  132  1.43  9,924  228  2.30 

Trading account assets

  11,950   142   1.19   11,602   135   1.16   10,335   136   1.31  10,335  136  1.31  10,821  152  1.41  9,197  141  1.53 

Investments

  2,850   79   2.77   3,058   102   3.34   3,915   87   2.24  3,915  87  2.24  3,544  77  2.18  4,471  95  2.13 

Loans

  21,634   395   1.83   24,279   466   1.92   25,412   499   1.96  25,412  499  1.96  24,822  599  2.41  28,037  851  3.03 
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Total interest-earning assets

  52,985   678   1.28   56,043   791   1.41   56,546   849   1.50  56,546  849  1.50  56,801  1,054  1.86  57,580  1,410  2.45 
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Deposits

  19,801   100   0.51   20,958   154   0.73   23,173   214   0.92  23,173  214  0.92  24,567  323  1.32  26,693  519  1.95 

Short-term borrowings(1)

  20,326   28   0.14   18,982   58   0.31   17,112   109   0.63  17,112  109  0.63  16,385  222  1.35  15,094  357  2.37 

Trading account liabilities

  1,692   17   1.05   1,195   8   0.69   1,049   7   0.71  1,049  7  0.71  1,235  14  1.16  1,249  16  1.29 

Long-term debt

  268   4   1.66   1,441   4   0.26   655   2   0.32  655  2  0.32  732  4  0.49  701  7  0.95 
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Total interest-bearing liabilities

  42,087   149   0.36   42,576   224   0.53   41,989   332   0.79  41,989  332  0.79  42,919  563  1.31  43,737  899  2.06 
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Net

  10,898   529   0.92   13,467   567   0.88   14,557   517   0.71  14,557  517  0.71  13,882  491  0.55  13,843  511  0.39 
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Total:

                  

Total interest-earning assets

  166,308   1,458   0.88   173,590   1,500   0.86   177,709   1,509   0.85  177,709  1,509  0.85  185,866  1,762  0.95  184,631  2,207  1.20 

Total interest-bearing liabilities

  150,911   412   0.27   155,133   495   0.32   155,679   602   0.39  155,679  602  0.39  161,161  890  0.55  158,936  1,313  0.83 
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Net

 ¥15,397  ¥1,046   0.61  ¥18,457  ¥1,005   0.54  ¥22,030  ¥907   0.46  ¥22,030  ¥907  0.46  ¥24,705  ¥872  0.40  ¥25,695  ¥894  0.37 
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

Note:

(1)

Short-term borrowings consist of due to trust accounts, call money and funds purchased, payables under repurchase agreements and securities lending transactions and other short-term borrowings.

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 20172019 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 20162018

Interest and dividend income increased by ¥9¥445 billion, or 0.6%25.3%, from the previous fiscal year to ¥1,509¥2,207 billion in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017.2019. Domestic interest and dividend income accounted for ¥660¥797 billion of the total amount, a decreasean increase of ¥49¥89 billion from the previous fiscal year, and foreign interest and dividend income accounted for ¥849¥1,410 billion, an increase of ¥58¥356 billion from the previous fiscal year.

DueLong-term interest rates continued to be in the monetary policiesvicinity of 0% under the Bank of Japan,Japan’s “Quantitative and Qualitative Monetary Easing with Yield Curve Control.” Short-term interest rates also continued to be in the vicinity of 0%. Under such as continuous monetary easing and the negative interest rate policy that began in February 2016, our domestic loan and deposit rate margin has become narrower. Reflecting a decline in short-term interest rate levels of the yen,circumstances, the average yield on domestic loans decreasedincreased by 0.120.07 percentage points from the previous fiscal year to 0.95% in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017,2019, and the average rate on domestic interest-bearing deposits decreased by 0.01 percentage points from the previous fiscal year to 0.06% in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017. Our domestic funding structure is stable, primarily consisting of individual customer deposits. The average yield on foreign loansremained at a low level and slightly increased by 0.04 percentage points from the previous fiscal year to 1.96%0.11% in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, and the2019. The average rateyield on foreign interest-bearing depositsloans increased by 0.190.62 percentage points from the previous fiscal year to 0.92%3.03% in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017. We place further emphasis2019, and the average rate on foreign deposits increased by 0.63 percentage points from the importance of profitabilityprevious fiscal year to 1.95% in the lending business and look to counter the effects of negative impact of negative interest rates and others.fiscal year ended March 31, 2019.

The decreaseincrease in domestic interest and dividend income was due mainly to a decreasean increase in interest income from domestic loans.investments. The decreaseincrease in interest income from domestic loansinvestments was due mainly to income related to the redemption of a decrease in the average yield, reflectingportion of our holdings of preferred stock of a decline in yen interest rate levels.Japanese corporation. Changes in the average yields on domestic interest-earning assets contributed to an overall decreaseincrease in interest and dividend income of ¥46¥95 billion, and changes in the average balances of domestic interest-earning assets contributed to an overalla decrease in interest and dividend income of ¥3¥6 billion, resulting in the ¥49¥89 billion decreaseincrease in domestic interest and dividend income.

The increase in foreign interest and dividend income was due mainly to increases in interest income from foreign loans and in interest income from foreign call loans and funds sold, and receivable under resale agreements and securities borrowing transactions. The increase in interest income from foreign loans was due mainly to an increase inand the average balance as well as an increase in the average yields. The increase in interest income from foreign call loans and funds sold, and receivable under resale agreements and securities borrowing transactions waswere due mainly to an increase in the average yield.yield reflecting a general increase in U.S. dollar interest rate levels. Changes in the average yieldsyield on foreign interest-earning assets contributed to an overall increase in interest and dividend income of ¥31¥292 billion, and changes in the average balance of foreign interest-earning assets contributed to an overall increase of ¥27¥64 billion, resulting in the ¥58¥356 billion overall increase in foreign interest and dividend income.

Interest expense increased by ¥107¥423 billion, or 21.6%47.5%, from the previous fiscal year to ¥602¥1,313 billion in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017.2019. Domestic interest expense accounted for ¥270¥414 billion of the total amount, a decreasean increase of ¥1¥87 billion from the previous fiscal year, and foreign interest expense accounted for ¥332¥899 billion of the total amount, an increase of ¥108¥336 billion from the previous fiscal year.

The changes in the average interest rates on domestic interest-bearing liabilities contributed to an overall decreaseincrease in interest expense of ¥3¥93 billion, and the changes in the average balance of domestic interest-bearing liabilities contributed to an overall increasea decrease in interest expense of ¥2¥6 billion, resulting in the ¥1¥87 billion decreaseoverall increase in domestic interest expense.

The increase in foreign interest expense was due mainly to increases in interest expensethe average rates on foreign deposits and foreign short-term borrowings. Theborrowings reflecting a general increase in foreign interest expense on foreign deposits was due mainly to an increase in the average rates, reflecting a rise in short-termU.S. dollar interest rate levels of the U.S. dollar as well as an increase in the average balance of foreign deposits. The increase in foreign interest expense on foreign short-term borrowings was due mainly to an increase in the average rates, reflecting a rise in short-term interest rate levels of the U.S. dollar.levels. The changes in the average interest rates on foreign interest-bearing liabilities

contributed to an overall increase in interest expense of ¥99¥324 billion, and the changes in the average balance of foreign interest-bearing liabilities contributed to an overall increase in interest expense of ¥9¥12 billion, resulting in the ¥108¥336 billion overall increase in foreign interest expense.

As a result of the foregoing, net interest income decreasedincreased by ¥98¥22 billion, or 9.8%2.5%, from the previous fiscal year to ¥907¥894 billion. The average interest rate spread declined by 0.080.03 percentage points from the previous fiscal year to 0.46%0.37% in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017.2019. The decline of the average interest rate spread was not significant because both the average yields on total interest-earning assets and the average interest rates on total interest-bearing liabilities generally leveled out between these periods.

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 20162018 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 20152017

Interest and dividend income increased by ¥42¥253 billion, or 2.9%16.8%, from the previous fiscal year to ¥1,500¥1,762 billion in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016.2018. Domestic interest and dividend income accounted for ¥709¥708 billion of the total amount, a decreasean increase of ¥71¥48 billion from the previous fiscal year, and foreign interest and dividend income accounted for ¥791¥1,054 billion, an increase of ¥113¥205 billion from the previous fiscal year.

DueLong-term interest rates continued to be in the monetary policiesvicinity of 0% under the Bank of Japan,Japan’s “Quantitative and Qualitative Monetary Easing with Yield Curve Control.” Short-term interest rates also continued to be in the vicinity of 0%. Under such as continuous monetary easing and the negative interest rate policy that began in February 2016, our domestic loan and deposit rate margin has become narrower. Reflecting a decline in short-term interest rate levels of the yen,circumstances, the average yield on domestic loans decreased by 0.020.07 percentage points from the previous fiscal year to 1.07%0.88% in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016, while2018, and the average rate on domestic interest-bearing deposits remained at a low level and slightly increased by 0.01 percentage points from the previous fiscal year to 0.07% in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016. Our domestic funding structure is stable, primarily consisting of individual customer deposits.2018. The average yield on foreign loans increased by 0.090.45 percentage points from the previous fiscal year to 1.92%2.41% in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016,2018, and the average rate on foreign interest-bearing deposits increased by 0.220.40 percentage points from the previous fiscal year to 0.73%1.32% in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016. We continue initiatives to increase foreign currency-denominated deposits. We place further emphasis on the importance of profitability in the lending business and look to counter the effects of negative impact of negative interest rates and others.2018.

The decreaseincrease in domestic interest and dividend income was due mainly to decreases in interest and dividend income from domestic investments and in interest income from domestic loans. The decreases in interest and dividend income from domestic investments and in interest income from domestic loans were due to decreasesan increase in the average balances as well as decreases in the average yields, reflecting a decline in yen interest rate levels.balance. Changes in the average yields on domestic interest-earning assets contributed to an overall decreaseincrease in interest and dividend income of ¥40¥4 billion, and changes in the average balances of domestic interest-earning assets contributed to an overall decreaseincrease in interest and dividend income of ¥31¥44 billion, resulting in the ¥71¥48 billion decreaseincrease in domestic interest and dividend income.

The increase in foreign interest and dividend income was due mainly to increases in interest income from foreign loans and in interest and dividend income from foreign investments.call loans and funds sold, and receivable under resale agreements and securities borrowing transactions. The increase in interest income from foreign loans wasand the increase in interest income from foreign call loans and funds sold, and receivable under resale agreements and securities borrowing transactions were due mainly to an increase in the average balance, especially in Western Europe, as well as an increase in the average yields. The increase in interest and dividend income from foreign investments was due to an increase in the average balance,yield, reflecting ana general increase in U.S. treasury bond holdings, as well as an increase in the average yield.dollar interest rate levels. Changes in the average yieldsyield on foreign interest-earning assets contributed to an overall increase in interest and dividend income of ¥56¥213 billion, and changes in the average balance of foreign interest-earning assets contributed to an overall increasea decrease of ¥57¥8 billion, resulting in the ¥113¥205 billion overall increase in foreign interest and dividend income.

Interest expense increased by ¥83¥288 billion, or 20.1%47.8%, from the previous fiscal year to ¥495¥890 billion in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016.2018. Domestic interest expense accounted for ¥271¥327 billion of the total amount, an increase of ¥8¥57 billion from the previous fiscal year, and foreign interest expense accounted for ¥224¥563 billion of the total amount, an increase of ¥75¥231 billion from the previous fiscal year.

The increase in domestic interest expense was due mainly to increases in interest expense on domestic deposits and long-term debt. The increase in domestic deposits was due to an increase in the average rates as well as an increase in the average balance. The increase in domestic long-term debt was due to an increase in the average balance, offset in part by a decrease in the average rates reflecting a decline in interest rate levels of yen. The changes in the average interest rates on domestic interest-bearing liabilities contributed to an overall decreaseincrease in interest expense of ¥20¥74 billion, and the changes in the average balance of domestic interest-bearing liabilities contributed to an overall increasea decrease in interest expense of ¥28¥17 billion, resulting in the ¥8¥57 billion overall increase in domestic interest expense.

The increase in foreign interest expense was due mainly to increases in interest expensethe average rates on foreign deposits and foreign short-term borrowings. Theborrowings, reflecting a general increase in foreign interest expense on foreign deposits was due mainly to an increase in the average rates, reflecting a rise in short-termU.S. dollar interest rate levels of the U.S. dollar as well as an increase in the average balance of foreign deposits. The increase in foreign interest expense on foreign short-term borrowings was due mainly to an increase in the average rates, reflecting a rise in short-term interest rate levels of the U.S. dollar.levels. The changes in the average interest rates on foreign interest-bearing liabilities contributed to an overall increase in interest expense of ¥72¥221 billion, and the changes in the average balance of foreign interest-bearing liabilities contributed to an overall increase in interest expense of ¥3¥10 billion, resulting in the ¥75¥231 billion overall increase in foreign interest expense.

As a result of the foregoing, net interest income decreased by ¥41¥35 billion, or 3.9%, from the previous fiscal year to ¥1,005¥872 billion. The average interest rate spread declined by 0.070.06 percentage points from the previous fiscal year to 0.54%0.40% in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016.2018. The decline of the average interest rate spread was not significant because both the average yields on total interest-earning assets and the average interest rates on total interest-bearing liabilities generally leveled out between these periods with respect to domestic assets and liabilities and increased by similar rates with respect to foreign assets and liabilities.periods.

Provision (Credit) for Loan Losses

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 20172019 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 20162018

Provision for loan losses increased by ¥3 billion from March 31, 2016 to ¥38 billion at March 31, 2017. Although obligor categories improved as a whole, reflecting the gradual recovery in the economic environment, provision for loan losses increased due mainly to the deterioration of credit status of certain borrowers.

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2016 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2015

We recorded a provision for loan losses of ¥35¥32 billion in the fiscal year ended March 31, 20162019 compared to a credit for loan losses of ¥60¥126 billion in the previous fiscal year. We recorded a modest level of provision for loan losses in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016, reflecting how2018. The change was due mainly to the Japanese economyabsence of the significant reversal that was in a “leveling off” phase, whereas we recorded a credit for loan losses in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015, reflecting how2018 related to improvements in the Japanese economycredit condition of some domestic borrowers.

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2018 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2017

We recorded a credit for loan losses of ¥126 billion in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018 compared to a provision for loan losses of ¥38 billion in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017. The change was due mainly to improvements in a “gradual recovery” phase.

the credit condition of some borrowers in the domestic manufacturing industry as well as the gradual recovery in the economic environment.

Noninterest Income

The following table shows a breakdown of noninterest income for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2015, 20162017, 2018 and 2017:2019:

 

  Fiscal years ended March 31,   Fiscal years ended March 31, 
  2015 2016   2017   2017 2018   2019 
  (in billions of yen)   (in billions of yen) 

Fee and commission

  ¥716  ¥743   ¥747   ¥826  ¥866   ¥853 

Fee and commission from deposits and lending business

   165  157    152 

Fee and commission from securities-related business

   172   176    166    166  180    145 

Fee and commission from deposits and lending business

   131   144    165 

Fee and commission from trust related business

   109  122    125 

Fee and commission from remittance business

   110   110    108    108  110    110 

Trust fees

   50   50    47 

Fee and commission from asset management business

   79  101    98 

Fee and commission from agency business

   36  37    36 

Fee and commission from guarantee related business

   26  28    29 

Fees for other customer services

   253   263    261    137  131    158 

Foreign exchange gains (losses)—net

   (35  114    69    69  92    94 

Trading account gains (losses)—net

   690   559    (42   (42 237    329 

Investment gains (losses)—net

   271   264    333    333  297    (160

Investment gains (losses) related to bonds

   104   66    61 

Investment gains (losses) related to equity securities

   163   192    272 

Others

   4   6    —   

Debt securities

   60  8    (4

Equity securities

   273  289    (156

Equity in earnings (losses) of equity method investees—net

   18   29    27    27  24    29 

Gains on disposal of premises and equipment

   3   10    6    6  8    5 

Other noninterest income

   138   165    228    149  81    72 
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

Total noninterest income

  ¥1,801  ¥1,884   ¥1,368   ¥1,368  ¥1,605   ¥1,222 
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 20172019 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 20162018

Noninterest income decreased by ¥516¥383 billion, or 27.4%23.9%, from the previous fiscal year to ¥1,368¥1,222 billion in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017.2019. The decrease was due mainly to trading accountinvestment losses—net of ¥42¥160 billion compared to trading accountinvestment gains—net of ¥559¥297 billion in the previous fiscal year, offset in part by an increase in investmenttrading account gains—net of ¥69¥92 billion.

Fee and commission

Fee and commission increaseddecreased by ¥4¥13 billion, or 0.5%1.4%, from the previous fiscal year to ¥747¥853 billion in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017.2019. The increasedecrease was due mainly to an increase in fee and commission from deposits and lending business of ¥21 billion, offset in part by a decrease in fee and commission from securities-related business of ¥10 billion.¥35 billion, or 19.3%, offset in part by an increase in fees for other customer services of ¥27 billion, or 20.4%. The decrease in fee and commission from securities-related business was due mainly to a decrease in brokerage fees amid a relative weakness in market conditions in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019 compared to the previous fiscal year.

Foreign exchange gains (losses)—net

Foreign exchange gains—net decreasedincreased by ¥45¥2 billion, or 39.5%2.2%, from the previous fiscal year to ¥69¥94 billion in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017.2019. The change was due mainly to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017.2019.

Trading account gains (losses)—net

Trading account gains (losses)—gains—net was a loss of ¥42increased by ¥92 billion, or 38.8%, from the previous fiscal year to ¥329 billion in the fiscal year ended March 31, 20172019. The increase in trading account gains—net was due mainly to an increase in gains related to changes in the fair value of receive-fixed,pay-variable interest-rate swaps reflecting a decline in long-term interest rates.

Investment gains (losses)—net

Investment gains (losses)—net was a loss of ¥160 billion in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019 compared to a gain of ¥559¥297 billion in the previous fiscal year. The change in trading account gains (losses)—net was due mainly to an increase ina change to investment losses related to a reductionequity securities of ¥156 billion in market valuethe fiscal year ended March 31, 2019 from investment gains related to equity securities of receive-fixed, pay-variable interest-rate swaps reflecting a rise in long-term interest rates, and¥289 billion for the previous fiscal year. The change to investment losses related to equity securities was due mainly to an increase in losses related to changes in the fair value of foreign currency-denominatedJapanese equity securities forin the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019, which mostly reflected the fair value option was elected, reflecting an increaserelative weakness in losses of foreign currency-denominated bonds due to the effect of a rise in long-term interest rates.market conditions. For further information, on the fair value option, see note 284 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASUNo.2016-01, “Financial Instruments—Overall (Subtopic825-10)—Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“ASUNo.2016-01”). The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years, and should be applied using a cumulative-effect adjustment to the balance sheet as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. We adopted ASUNo.2016-01 on April 1, 2018. The effect of the adoption on us was limited.

Investment gains (losses)—netFiscal Year Ended March 31, 2018 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2017

Investment gains—netNoninterest income increased by ¥69¥237 billion, or 26.1 %,17.3%, from the previous fiscal year to ¥333¥1,605 billion in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017.2018. The increase was due mainly to an increasetrading account gains—net of ¥237 billion compared to trading account losses—net of ¥42 billion in the previous fiscal year, offset in part by a decrease in other noninterest income of ¥68 billion and a decrease in investment gains related to equity securitiesgains—net of ¥80¥36 billion.

Fee and commission

Fee and commission increased by ¥40 billion, or 41.7%4.8%, from the previous fiscal year to ¥272¥866 billion in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017. The increase in investment gains related to equity securities was due mainly to an increase in gains on sales of investment account equity securities in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, reflecting our continued efforts to decrease our cross-shareholdings. We continue our reallocation of management resources to key strategies while mitigating the risk of stock price fluctuation.

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2016 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2015

Noninterest income increased by ¥83 billion, or 4.6%, from the previous fiscal year to ¥1,884 billion in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016. The increase was due mainly to foreign exchange gains—net of ¥114 billion compared to foreign exchange losses—net of ¥35 billion in the previous fiscal year and an increase in fees and commissions income of ¥27 billion, offset in part by a decrease in trading account gains—net of ¥131 billion and a decrease in investment gains—net of ¥7 billion.

Fee and commission

Fee and commission increased by ¥27 billion, or 3.8%, from the previous fiscal year to ¥743 billion in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016.2018. The increase was due mainly to an increase in fee and commission from deposits and lendingasset management business of ¥13¥22 billion, or 27.8%, and an increase in fees for other customer servicesfee and commission from securities-related business of ¥10 billion.¥14 billion, or 8.4%. The increase in fee and commission from deposits and lendingasset management business was due mainly to an increase in domestic lending transactions, and the increase in fees for other customer services was due mainly to an increase in fees related to derivative transactions.

We aim to develop into a Financial Services Consulting Group bothinvestment trust management and investment advisory management businesses. The increase in Japanfee and overseas by using our group strengths to provide customers with financial solutions, improving our presence in targetedcommission from securities-related business areas and obtaining additional financial transaction business. We are pursuing deepened collaboration among banking, trust, securities and asset management functions to strengthen fee businesses and to increase and enhancenon-interest income. We seek to realize customer needs and observe fiduciary duties at the highest level and utilize our strength as a group and support the “shift from savings to investment” and contributewas due mainly to the invigoration of individuals’ financial assets. We also aimrelative strength in market conditions in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018 compared to minimize the negative impact from the negative interest rate policy of the Bank of Japan on income by strengtheningnon-interest income through measures such as strengthening investment products sales by capturing the ongoing flow from savings to investments among retail customers.previous fiscal year.

Foreign exchange gains (losses)—net

Foreign exchange gains (losses)—gains—net was a gain of ¥114increased by ¥23 billion, or 33.3%, from the previous fiscal year to ¥92 billion in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 compared to a loss of ¥35 billion in the previous fiscal year.2018. The change was due mainly to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016.2018.

Trading account gains (losses)—net

Trading account gains (losses)—net decreased by ¥131 billion, or 19.0%, from the previous fiscal year to ¥559was a gain of ¥237 billion in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016.2018 compared to a loss of ¥42 billion in the previous fiscal year. The decreasechange was due mainly to a decreasean increase in gains related to changes in the fair value of foreign currency-denominated securities for which thesecurities. Long-term interest rates rose and unrealized losses of fair value option was elected, reflecting a decrease in foreign currency-denominated bonds due to sales and redemptions andincreased during the effectprevious fiscal year. The fluctuation range of a lower decline in long-term interest rates than in the previous fiscal year,narrowed, unrealized losses decreased, and a decrease in gains related to changes in the fair value of domestic equity securities reflecting declines in stock market prices, especially in our

unrealized profit increased.

consolidated investment funds, offset in part by an increase in gains related to changes in the fair value of derivative financial instruments used to hedge market risks, mainly interest rate risks, that are not eligible for hedge accounting under U.S. GAAP.

Investment gains (losses)—net

Investment gains—net decreased by ¥7¥36 billion, or 2.610.8 %, from the previous fiscal year to ¥264¥297 billion in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016.2018. The decrease was due mainly to a decrease in investment gains related to bonds of ¥38¥52 billion, or 36.5 %,86.7%, from the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015 to ¥66¥8 billion in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016, offset in part by an increase in investment gains related to equity securities of ¥29 billion, or 17.8%, from the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015 to ¥192 billion in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016.2018. The decrease in investment gains related to bonds was due mainly to a decrease in gains on sales of investment account bonds and an increase in losses on sales of investment account bonds in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016, reflecting a decrease in the amount of bonds sold. The increase in investment gains related to equity securities was due mainly to an increase in gains on sales of investment account equity securities in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016, reflecting our continued efforts to decrease our cross-shareholdings. We continue our reallocation of management resources to key strategies while mitigating the risk of stock price fluctuation.2018.

Noninterest Expenses

The following table shows a breakdown of noninterest expenses for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2015, 20162017, 2018 and 2017:2019:

 

  Fiscal years ended March 31,   Fiscal years ended March 31, 
  2015 2016 2017   2017   2018 2019 
  (in billions of yen)   (in billions of yen) 

Salaries and employee benefits

  ¥605  ¥634  ¥663   ¥663   ¥688  ¥683 

General and administrative expenses

   530   548   571    571    586  762 

Impairment of goodwill

   —     6   —   

Occupancy expenses

   189   196   195    195    192  208 

Fee and commission expenses

   134   146   148    177    189  190 

Provision (credit) for losses onoff-balance-sheet instruments

   (3  (16  19    19    (30 (9

Other noninterest expenses

   184   143   161    132    139  165 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total noninterest expenses

  ¥1,639  ¥1,657  ¥1,757   ¥1,757   ¥1,764  ¥1,999 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 20172019 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 20162018

Noninterest expenses increased by ¥100¥235 billion, or 6.0%13.3%, from the previous fiscal year to ¥1,757¥1,999 billion in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017.2019. The increase was due mainly to an increase in general and administrative expenses of ¥176 billion, or 30.0%, and a decrease in credit for losses onoff-balance-sheet instruments of ¥21 billion, or 70.0%.

We will continue to enhance the efficiency of our organizational structure and staffing by reorganizing head office personnel, shifting some to the frontlines and placing a limit on hiring. We will also restructure our customer channels by combining branches to offer banking, trust banking, and securities services jointly through the same branches.

General and administrative expenses

General and administrative expenses increased by ¥176 billion, or 30.0%, from the previous fiscal year to ¥762 billion in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019. The increase was due mainly to the commencement of depreciation of the next-generation IT systems.

Provision (credit) for losses onoff-balance-sheet instruments

Credit for losses onoff-balance-sheet instruments decreased by ¥21 billion from the previous fiscal year to ¥9 billion in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019. The change was due mainly to a decrease in reversal of allowance for losses on guarantees.

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2018 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2017

Noninterest expenses increased by ¥7 billion, or 0.4%, from the previous fiscal year to ¥1,764 billion in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018. The increase was due mainly to an increase in salaries and employee benefits of ¥25 billion, or 3.8%, and general and administrative expenses of ¥15 billion, or 2.6%, offset in part by credit for losses onoff-balance-sheet instruments of ¥30 billion compared to provision for losses onoff-balance-sheet instruments of ¥19 billion compared to credit for losses onoff-balance-sheet instruments of ¥16 billion in the previous fiscal year, an increase in salaries and employee benefits of ¥29 billion and an increase in general and administrative expenses of ¥23 billion.year.

As the result of an increase in expenses associated with strategic investments and an increase in domestic salaries and employee benefits, our costs and expenses exceeded our plan for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017. Going forward, weWe will continue to aim to promote furtherachieve sustainable growth of the group looking ahead ten years and to secure future competitive superiority. These efforts include organization and personnel optimization, system structural reform, bychannel reconstruction and strengthening cost competitiveness through fundamental structural reform such as reviewing branch strategies, improvements to achieve advanced and efficient operations utilizing technology, streamlining and optimizing the organization, and information systems structural reform.

of earnings.

Salaries and employee benefits

Salaries and employee benefits increased by ¥29¥25 billion, or 4.6%3.8%, from the previous fiscal year to ¥663¥688 billion in the fiscal year ended March 31, 20172018 due mainly to an increase in personnel expenses and an increase in employee retirement benefit expenses. The increase in personnel expenses was due mainly toreflecting an increase in domestic personnel expenses. The increase in employee retirement benefit expenses was due mainly toand an increase in the amortization of net actuarial losses.bonuses at overseas branches. Additional information regarding pension and other employee benefit plans is included in note 21 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.

Provision (credit) for losses onoff-balance-sheet instruments

Provision (credit) for losses onoff-balance-sheet instruments was a provisioncredit of ¥19¥30 billion in the fiscal year ended March 31, 20172018 compared to a creditprovision of ¥16¥19 billion in the previous fiscal year. The change was due mainly to an increase in reversal of allowance for losses on guarantees.

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2016 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2015

Noninterest expenses increased by ¥18 billion, or 1.1%, from the previous fiscal year to ¥1,657 billion in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016. The increase was due mainly to an increase in salaries and employee benefit expenses of ¥29 billion, offset in part by an increase in credit for losses onoff-balance-sheet instruments of ¥13 billion.

Our costs and expenses were generally flat, compared with the previous fiscal year. Going forward, we aim to absorb an expected increase in expenses associated with forward looking strategic investments and next-generation IT systems through the realization of investment effects and cost structure reform impacts as well as pursuit of operational efficiencies. In pursuit of operational efficiencies, we aim to improve productivity and eliminate waste thereby securing necessary resources to further generate added value for our customers, and enhance operations by allocating management resources to further improve cost competitiveness.

Salaries and employee benefits

Salaries and employee benefits increased by ¥29 billion, or 4.8%, from the previous fiscal year to ¥634 billion in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 due mainly to an increase in personnel expenses, offset in part by a decrease in employee retirement benefit expenses. The increase in personnel expenses was due mainly to an increase in overseas personnel expenses, including strategic expenses related to overseas expansion. The increase in strategic expenses related to overseas expansion was absorbed by strict cost control and fluctuations in exchange rates. The decrease in employee retirement benefit expenses was due mainly to a decrease in the amortization of net actuarial loss, which primarily reflects past recoveries of the fair value of plan assets.

Provision (credit) for losses onoff-balance-sheet instruments

Credit for losses onoff-balance-sheet instruments increased by ¥13 billion from the previous fiscal year to ¥16 billion in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 due mainly to a decrease in allowance for losses on guarantees and reimbursement of debentures.

Income Tax Expense

The following table shows the components of income tax expense (benefit) for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2015, 20162017, 2018 and 2017:2019:

 

  Fiscal years ended March 31,   Fiscal years ended March 31, 
    2015       2016       2017         2017     2018       2019   
  (in billions of yen)   (in billions of yen) 

Current:

         

Domestic

  ¥184  ¥163  ¥130   ¥130  ¥130   ¥116 

Foreign

   72   61   68    68  47    50 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

Total current tax expense

   256   224   198    198  177    166 

Deferred:

         

Domestic

   187   127   (100   (100 58    (162

Foreign

   (5  (4  (7   (7 2    5 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

Total deferred tax expense (benefit)

   182   123   (107   (107 60    (157
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

Total income tax expense

  ¥438  ¥347  ¥91   ¥91  ¥237   ¥9 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 20172019 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 20162018

Income tax expense decreased by ¥256¥228 billion, or 73.8%96.2%, from the previous fiscal year to ¥91¥9 billion in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017,2019 due to a decrease in current tax expense of ¥26¥11 billion and a decrease in deferred tax expense of ¥217 billion related to a deferred tax benefit of ¥107¥157 billion in the current fiscal year as compared to a deferred tax expense of ¥123¥60 billion in the previous fiscal year. The decrease in current tax expense was due mainly to a decrease in the taxable income of a principal banking subsidiary.subsidiaries. The change in deferred tax expense (benefit) was due mainly to an increasedecreases in deferred tax assets inliabilities of principal banking subsidiaries and an increaserelating to a decrease in deferred tax assets relatedliabilities attributable to security subsidiary’s net operating loss carryforwards resulting mainly from organizational restructuring of certain foreign security subsidiaries in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017.equity securities.

We consider the sales ofavailable-for-sale securities to be a qualifyingtax-planning strategy that is a possible source of future taxable income to the extent necessary in the future mainly with respect to our principal banking subsidiaries in Japan. The reliance on thistax-planning strategy of our subsidiaries in Japan was increased from at immaterial levels to approximatelyone-third of overall deferred tax assets during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017.immaterial.

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 20162018 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 20152017

Income tax expense decreasedincreased by ¥91¥146 billion, or 20.8%160.4%, from the previous fiscal year to ¥347¥237 billion in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016,2018 due to a decrease in current tax expense of ¥32¥21 billion and a decreasean increase in deferred tax expense of ¥59 billion.¥167 billion related to a deferred tax expense of ¥60 billion in the current fiscal year as compared to a deferred tax benefit of ¥107 billion in the previous fiscal year. The decrease in current tax expense was due mainly to a decrease in the taxable income of a principal banking subsidiary.subsidiaries. The decreasechange in deferred tax expense (benefit) was due mainly to decreases in the temporary differences of ourdeferred tax assets in principal banking subsidiaries.

We consider the sales ofavailable-for-sale securities to be a qualifyingtax-planning strategy that is a possible source of future taxable income to the extent necessary in the future mainly with respect to our principal banking subsidiaries in Japan. The reliance on thistax-planning strategy of our subsidiaries in Japan was unchanged at immaterial levels of overall deferred tax assets at both March 31, 2015 and March 31, 2016, while the reliance was reduced from approximatelyone-fifthone-third to immaterial levels of overall deferred tax assets during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015.2018.

The following table shows components of deferred tax assets (liabilities) as of March 31, 2015, 20162017, 2018 and 2017:2019:

 

  As of March 31,   As of March 31, 
  2015 2016 2017   2017 2018 2019 
  (in billions of yen)   (in billions of yen) 

Deferred tax assets:

        

Allowance for loan losses

  ¥184  ¥127  ¥123 

Premises and equipment

   4  5  74 

Derivative financial instruments

   14  53  48 

Investments

  ¥576  ¥522  ¥498    498  454   —   

Allowance for loan losses

   225   179   184 

Trading securities

   —     —     31    31  2   —   

Derivative financial instruments

   9   —     14 

Premises and equipment

   —     —     4 

Net operating loss carryforwards

   392   342   452    452  178  168 

Other

   198   170   190    190  204  216 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Gross deferred tax assets

   1,400   1,213   1,373    1,373  1,023  629 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Valuation allowance

   (389  (340  (438   (438 (163 (158
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance

   1,011   873   935    935  860  471 

Deferred tax liabilities:

        

Prepaid pension cost and accrued pension liabilities

   195  255  248 

Investments

   —     —    198 

Available-for-sale securities

   910   711   724    724  764  12 

Prepaid pension cost and accrued pension liabilities

   218   175   195 

Undistributed earnings of subsidiaries

   28   12   17 

Derivative financial instruments

   —     57   —   

Trading securities

   39   23   —      —     —    9 

Premises and equipment

   3   1   —   

Other

   49   39   75    92  90  62 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Gross deferred tax liabilities

   1,247   1,018   1,011    1,011  1,109  529 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net deferred tax assets (liabilities)

  ¥(236 ¥(145 ¥(76  ¥(76 ¥(249 ¥(58
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 20172019 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 20162018

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests increased by ¥27 billion from the previous fiscal year to ¥27was a loss of ¥9 billion in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017.2019 compared to income of ¥24 billion in the previous fiscal year.

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 20162018 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 20152017

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests decreased by ¥27¥3 billion from the previous fiscal year to ¥0¥24 billion in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016. The decrease was due mainly to deconsolidation of certain investment funds.2018.

Net Income Attributable to MHFG Shareholders

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 20172019 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 20162018

As a result of the foregoing, net income attributable to MHFG shareholders decreased by ¥488¥493 billion, or 57.4%85.3%, from the previous fiscal year to ¥362¥85 billion in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017.2019.

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 20162018 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 20152017

As a result of the foregoing, net income attributable to MHFG shareholders increased by ¥47¥216 billion, or 5.9%59.7%, from the previous fiscal year to ¥850¥578 billion in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016.

2018.

Business Segments Analysis

We have introducedmanage our group under anin-house company system based on our diverse customer segments as of April 2016.segments. The aim of this system is to leverage our strengths and competitive advantage, which is the seamless integration of our

banking, trust banking and securities functions under a holding company structure, to speedily provide high-quality financial services that closely match customer needs.

Specifically, the company system is classified into the following fivein-house companies, each based on a customer segment: the Retail & Business Banking Company, the Corporate & Institutional Company, the Global Corporate Company, the Global Markets Company, and the Asset Management Company. We regard these customer segments as our operating segments.

In line with the aforementioned system, the reportable segments have been changed from those based on the relevant principal consolidated subsidiaries to the fivein-house companies.

For a brief description of our each business segment, see note 32 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.

Results of Operations by Business Segment

Consolidated Results of Operations

Consolidated gross profits + net gains related to ETFs and others for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20172019 were ¥2,092.7¥1,827.7 billion, a decrease of ¥128.9¥167.9 billion compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016.2018. Consolidated general and administrative expenses for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20172019 were ¥1,420.5¥1,440.6 billion, an increasea decrease of ¥75.5¥3.6 billion compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016.2018. Consolidated equity in earnings of equity method investees—net business profits for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 were ¥663.42019 was ¥51.2 billion, a decreasean increase of ¥189.5¥29.7 billion compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016.2018. Consolidated net business profits + net gains related to ETFs and others for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019 were ¥408.4 billion, a decrease of ¥129.6 billion compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018.

 

  Mizuho Financial Group (Consolidated) 
Fiscal year ended March 31, 2016(1): Retail &
Business
Banking
Company
  Corporate &
Institutional
Company
  Global
Corporate
Company
  Global
Markets
Company
  Asset
Management
Company
  Others(3)  Total 
  (in billions of yen) 
       

Gross profits

 ¥676.4  ¥434.9  ¥403.8  ¥577.7  ¥52.1  ¥76.7  ¥2,221.6 

General and administrative expenses

  661.2   183.2   232.7   178.9   30.1   58.9   1,345.0 

Others

  —     —     —     —     —     (23.7  (23.7
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net business profits (losses)(2)

 ¥15.2  ¥251.7  ¥171.1  ¥398.8  ¥22.0  ¥(5.9 ¥852.9 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  Mizuho Financial Group (Consolidated) 
Fiscal year ended March 31, 2017: Retail &
Business
Banking
Company
  Corporate &
Institutional
Company
  Global
Corporate
Company
  Global
Markets
Company
  Asset
Management
Company
  Others(3)  Total 
  (in billions of yen) 
       

Gross profits

 ¥646.1  ¥445.1  ¥386.5  ¥539.4  ¥49.6  ¥26.0  ¥2,092.7 

General and administrative expenses

  678.3   186.7   237.8   200.9   29.3   87.5   1,420.5 

Others

  —     —     —     —     —     (8.8  (8.8
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net business profits (losses)(2)

 ¥(32.2 ¥258.4  ¥148.7  ¥338.5  ¥20.3  ¥(70.3 ¥663.4 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  Mizuho Financial Group (Consolidated) 
Fiscal year ended March 31, 2017(4): Retail &
Business
Banking
Company
  Corporate &
Institutional
Company
  Global
Corporate
Company
  Global
Markets
Company
  Asset
Management
Company
  Others(3)  Total 
  (in billions of yen) 

Gross profits + Net gains (losses) related to ETFs and others(1)

 ¥716.7  ¥438.3  ¥339.4  ¥549.3  ¥48.8  ¥36.7  ¥2,129.2 

General and administrative expenses

  719.3   199.9   239.2   191.2   29.3   31.4   1,410.3 

Equity in earnings (losses) of equity method investees—net

  14.9   1.0   0.9   —     0.5   1.6   18.9 

Amortization of goodwill and others

  0.4   0.4   0.4   2.3   4.0   2.7   10.2 

Others

  —     —     —     —     —     (27.7  (27.7
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net business profits (losses)(2) + Net gains (losses) related to ETFs and others

 ¥11.9  ¥239.0  ¥100.7  ¥355.8  ¥16.0  ¥(23.5 ¥699.9 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

  Mizuho Financial Group (Consolidated) 
Fiscal year ended March 31, 2018(4): Retail &
Business
Banking
Company
  Corporate &
Institutional
Company
  Global
Corporate
Company
  Global
Markets
Company
  Asset
Management
Company
  Others(3)  Total 
  (in billions of yen) 

Gross profits + Net gains (losses) related to ETFs and others(1)

 ¥726.9  ¥431.4  ¥340.7  ¥389.2  ¥50.1  ¥57.3  ¥1,995.6 

General and administrative expenses

  724.8   202.5   250.9   201.2   27.6   37.2   1,444.2 

Equity in earnings (losses) of equity method investees—net

  12.7   1.0   2.3   —     2.9   2.6   21.5 

Amortization of goodwill and others

  0.4   0.4   0.4   2.3   8.0   2.4   13.9 

Others

  —     —     —     —     —     (21.0  (21.0
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net business profits (losses)(2) + Net gains (losses) related to ETFs and others

 ¥14.4  ¥229.5  ¥91.7  ¥185.7  ¥17.4  ¥(0.7 ¥538.0 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

  Mizuho Financial Group (Consolidated) 
Fiscal year ended March 31, 2019(4): Retail &
Business
Banking
Company
  Corporate &
Institutional
Company
  Global
Corporate
Company
  Global
Markets
Company
  Asset
Management
Company
  Others(3)  Total 
  (in billions of yen) 

Gross profits+ Net gains (losses) related to ETFs and others(1)

 ¥707.2  ¥473.8  ¥416.1  ¥192.0  ¥49.7  ¥(11.1 ¥1,827.7 

General and administrative expenses

  713.7   198.2   251.8   203.3   27.3   46.3   1,440.6 

Equity in earnings (losses) of equity method investees—net

  18.1   0.9   7.3   —     1.3   23.6   51.2 

Amortization of goodwill and others

  0.4   0.4   0.4   2.3   8.0   2.1   13.6 

Others

  —     —     —     —     —     (16.3  (16.3
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net business profits (losses)(2) + Net gains (losses) related to ETFs and others

 ¥11.2  ¥276.1  ¥171.2  ¥(13.6 ¥15.7  ¥(52.2 ¥408.4 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Fixed assets(5)

 ¥499.3  ¥225.8  ¥176.9  ¥92.6  ¥0.1  ¥662.5  ¥1,657.2 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

Notes:

(1)

Following“Gross profits + Net gains (losses) related to ETFs and others” is reported instead of sales reported by general corporations. Gross profits is defined as the introductionsum of anin-house company system basednet interest income, fiduciary income, net fee and commission income, net trading income and net other operating income. Net gains (losses) related to ETFs and others consist of net gains (losses) on customer segments in April 2016, segment information forETFs held by Mizuho Bank and Mizuho Trust & Banking and net gains (losses) on operating investment securities of Mizuho Securities on its consolidated basis. For the fiscal yearyears ended March 31, 2016 was restated2017, 2018 and 2019, net gains related to reflect the relevant changes as transaction data on a

customer segment basis had been maintained. DueETFs and others amounted to such data not being available, it is impracticable to restate segment information for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015.¥36.5 billion, ¥80.2 billion and ¥15.0 billion, respectively, of which ¥32.6 billion, ¥70.1 billion and ¥7.3 billion, respectively, are included in “Global Markets Company.”

(2)

Net business profits is used in Japan as a measure of the profitability of core banking operations and is defined as gross profits (or the sum of net interest income, fiduciary income, net fee and commission income, net trading income and net other operating income)(as defined above) less general and administrative expenses.expenses plus equity in earnings (losses) of equity method investees—net and others. Measurement of net business profits is required for regulatory reporting to the Financial Services Agency.

(3)

“Others” includes items which should be eliminated as internal transactions between each segment on a consolidated basis.

Before the introduction of thein-house company system, business segment information was disclosed based on the relevant principal consolidated subsidiaries such as Mizuho Bank, Mizuho Trust & Banking, and Mizuho Securities. Segment information based on the relevant principal consolidated subsidiaries for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017 is as follows:

  Mizuho Bank (Consolidated)  Mizuho
Trust&
Banking
(Consolidated)
  Mizuho
Securities
(Consolidated)
  Others  Mizuho
Financial
Group
(Consolidated)
 
     Mizuho Bank (Non-consolidated)  Others             
Fiscal year ended March 31, 2015(1)(2): Total  Total  Personal
Banking
(a)
  Retail
Banking
(b)
  Corporate
Banking

(Large
Corporations)
(c)
  Corporate
Banking
(d)
  Financial
Institutions

&  Public
Sector
Business

(e)
  Inter-
national
Banking
(f)
  Trading
and
others
(g)
  (h)  (i)  (j)  (k)  Total 
  (in billions of yen) 
              
Gross profits:              

Net interest income

 ¥1,087.3  ¥934.9  ¥213.4  ¥77.6  ¥179.5  ¥99.6  ¥33.3  ¥147.1  ¥184.4  ¥152.4  ¥39.4  ¥1.8  ¥0.9  ¥1,129.4 

Net noninterest income

  598.4   560.6   48.7   53.7   128.0   79.8   27.4   164.9   58.1   37.8   122.6   335.8   61.5   1,118.3 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  1,685.7   1,495.5   262.1   131.3   307.5   179.4   60.7   312.0   242.5   190.2   162.0   337.6   62.4   2,247.7 
General and administrative expenses  904.7   833.7   233.5   118.4   94.4   76.5   30.3   92.6   188.0   71.0   94.5   268.0   54.0   1,321.2 
Others  (43.2  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     (43.2  (3.7  —     (2.7  (49.6
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net business profits(3)

 ¥737.8  ¥661.8  ¥28.6  ¥12.9  ¥213.1  ¥102.9  ¥30.4  ¥219.4  ¥54.5  ¥76.0  ¥63.8  ¥69.6  ¥5.7  ¥876.9 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  Mizuho Bank (Consolidated)  Mizuho
Trust&
Banking
(Consolidated)
  Mizuho
Securities
(Consolidated)
  Others  Mizuho
Financial
Group
(Consolidated)
 
     Mizuho Bank (Non-consolidated)  Others             
Fiscal year ended March 31, 2016(2): Total  Total  Personal
Banking
(a)
  Retail
Banking
(b)
  Corporate
Banking

(Large
Corporations)
(c)
  Corporate
Banking
(d)
  Financial
Institutions

&  Public
Sector
Business

(e)
  Inter-
national
Banking
(f)
  Trading
and
others
(g)
  (h)  (i)  (j)  (k)  Total 
  (in billions of yen) 
              
Gross profits:              

Net interest income

 ¥959.4  ¥830.1  ¥214.8  ¥75.7  ¥173.0  ¥97.5  ¥32.5  ¥175.5  ¥61.1  ¥129.3  ¥36.1  ¥5.4  ¥2.8  ¥1,003.7 

Net noninterest income

  675.3   633.7   45.0   53.1   143.7   77.5   31.8   185.1   97.5   41.6   130.7   343.8   68.1   1,217.9 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  1,634.7   1,463.8   259.8   128.8   316.7   175.0   64.3   360.6   158.6   170.9   166.8   349.2   70.9   2,221.6 
General and administrative expenses  903.3   833.3   234.4   118.6   91.9   75.2   29.8   122.1   161.3   70.0   99.1   279.3   63.3   1,345.0 
Others  (22.1  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     (22.1  (4.2  —     2.5   (23.8
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net business profits (losses) (3)

 ¥709.3  ¥630.5  ¥25.4  ¥10.2  ¥224.8  ¥99.8  ¥34.5  ¥238.5  ¥(2.7 ¥78.8  ¥63.5  ¥69.9  ¥10.1  ¥852.8 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

  Mizuho  Bank
(Consolidated)
  Mizuho
Trust &
Banking

(Consolidated)
  Mizuho
Securities

(Consolidated)
  Others  Mizuho
Financial
Group

(Consolidated)
 
     Mizuho Bank
(Non-consolidated)
  Others             
Fiscal year ended March 31, 2017(2)(4): Total  (a)-(g)
Total
  (h)  (i)  (j)  (k)  Total 
  (in billions of yen) 
       
Gross profits:       

Net interest income (expense)

 ¥836.5  ¥719.8  ¥116.7  ¥30.2  ¥(1.5 ¥2.6  ¥867.8 

Net noninterest income

  686.7   600.6   86.1   121.8   333.1   83.3   1,224.9 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  1,523.2   1,320.4   202.8   152.0   331.6   85.9   2,092.7 
General and administrative expenses  982.7   866.6   116.1   101.6   257.5   78.7   1,420.5 
Others  (8.7  —     (8.7  (5.2  0.1   5.0   (8.8
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net business profits(3)

 ¥531.8  ¥453.8  ¥78.0  ¥45.2  ¥74.2  ¥12.2  ¥663.4 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Notes:

(1)(4)

Beginning on April 1, 2015,2018, new allocation methods for income and expense transactions between each segment and “Others” have been appliedapplied. In connection with the use of the new allocation methods, the presentation of “Net business profits” has changed to “Net business profits (losses) + Net gains (losses) related to ETFs and others.” Before the calculation ofchange, “Net gains (losses) related to ETFs and others” were included in “Gross profits” of each segment and “Generaleliminated in “Others.” In addition, “Amortization of goodwill and administrative expenses” for reportable segments of Mizuho Bank.others” has been presented as a new item. Figures for the fiscal yearyears ended March 31, 20152017 and 2018 have been restated for the new allocation methods. These changes more appropriately reflect the performance of each of the operating segments in accordance with internal managerial accounting rules and practices. Furthermore, income and expense of foreign branches of Mizuho Bank and foreign subsidiaries with functional currency other than Japanese Yen have been translated for purposes of segment reporting using the budgeted foreign currency rates. Prior period comparative amounts for these foreign currency income and expense have been translated using current period budgeted foreign currency rates.

(2)(5)

Others (h)”Fixed assets” is presented based on Japanese GAAP and “Others (k)” includecorresponds to the elimination of transactions between consolidated subsidiaries.

(3)Net business profits is used in Japan as a measuretotal amount of the profitability of core banking operations,following U.S. GAAP accounts, Premises andequipment-net, Goodwill, and Intangible assets. The above tables do not include other asset amounts because “Fixed assets” is defined as gross profits (or the sum of net interest income, fiduciary income, net feeonly balance sheet metric that management uses when evaluating and commission income, net trading income and net other operating income) less general and administrative expenses. Measurement of net business profits is required for regulatory reportingmaking decisions pertaining to the Financial Services Agency.
(4)Segment information based on the relevant principal consolidated subsidiaries foroperating segments. “Fixed assets” has been allocated to each segment starting in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 is presented for comparability purposes. Due2019 to system limitations, it is impracticableenhance management’s analysis of our operations. “Others” in “Fixed assets” includes assets of headquarters that have not been allocated to presenteach segment, “Fixed assets” pertaining to consolidated subsidiaries that are not subject to allocation, consolidating adjustments, and others. Certain “Fixed assets” expenses have been allocated to the details of Mizuho Bank(Non-consolidated).in-house company segments using a reasonable allocation criteria.

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 20172019 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 20162018

Retail & Business Banking Company

Gross profits + net gains related to ETFs and others for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20172019 were ¥646.1¥707.2 billion, a decrease of ¥30.3¥19.7 billion, or 4.5%2.7%, compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016.2018. The decrease was attributable mainly to a decrease of net interest income as a result of the effects of the negative interest rate policyand asset management-related revenue which were offset in Japan and a decreasepart by an increase in income related to investment products.solution-related revenue.

General and administrative expenses for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 increased2019 decreased by ¥17.1¥11.1 billion, or 2.6%1.5%, compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 20162018 to ¥678.3¥713.7 billion.

Equity in earnings of equity method investees—net for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019 increased by ¥5.4 billion, or 42.5%, compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018 to ¥18.1 billion.

As a result, net business profits + net gains related to ETFs and others for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019 decreased by ¥3.2 billion, or 22.2%, compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018 to ¥11.2 billion.

Corporate & Institutional Company

Gross profits + net gains related to ETFs and others for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019 were ¥473.8 billion, an increase of ¥42.4 billion, or 9.8%, compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018. The increase was attributable mainly to an increase in personnel expenses, including employee retirement benefit expenses.

As a result, we recorded net business losses of ¥32.2 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 compared to net business profits of ¥15.2 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016.

Corporate & Institutional Company

Gross profits for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 were ¥445.1 billion, an increase of ¥10.2 billion, or 2.3%, compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016. The increase was attributable mainly to an increase innon-interest income, reflecting an improvement in our solution-related business.M&A and initial public offering-related revenue.

General and administrative expenses for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 increased2019 decreased by ¥3.5¥4.3 billion, or 1.9%2.1%, compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 20162018 to ¥186.7¥198.2 billion.

As a result, net business profits + net gains related to ETFs and others for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20172019 increased by ¥6.7¥46.6 billion, or 2.7%20.3%, compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 20162018 to ¥258.4¥276.1 billion.

Global Corporate Company

Gross profits + net gains related to ETFs and others for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20172019 were ¥386.5¥416.1 billion, a decreasean increase of ¥17.3¥75.4 billion, or 4.3%22.1%, compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016.2018. The decreaseincrease was attributable mainly to the appreciation of the yen against the dollar and other major currencies and the slowdownincrease in business related tonon-Japanese customers in Asia, which reflected regional economic trends.loan related-revenue.

General and administrative expenses for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20172019 increased by ¥5.1¥0.9 billion, or 2.2%0.4%, compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 20162018 to ¥237.8¥251.8 billion. The increase was attributable mainly to an increase

Equity in premiums for deposit insuranceearnings of foreign branches of Mizuho Bank.

As a result, equity method investees—net business profits for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 decreased2019 increased by ¥22.4¥5.0 billion, or 13.1%217.4%, compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 20162018 to ¥148.7¥7.3 billion.

Global Markets Company

GrossAs a result, net business profits + net gains related to ETFs and others for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 were ¥539.4 billion, a decrease of ¥38.32019 increased by ¥79.5 billion, or 6.6%86.7%, compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016.2018 to ¥171.2 billion.

Global Markets Company

Gross profits + net gains related to ETFs and others for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019 were ¥192.0 billion, a decrease of ¥197.2 billion, or 50.7%, compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018. The decrease was attributable mainly to the decreaserestructuring of our securities portfolio in income related to the sellingrespect of past investments in foreign bonds under a volatile market environment.bonds. See “Item 3.A. Key Information—Japanese GAAP Selected Consolidated Financial Information”

General and administrative expenses for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20172019 increased by ¥22.0¥2.1 billion, or 12.3%1.0%, compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 20162018 to ¥200.9¥203.3 billion.

As a result, we recorded net business profitslosses + net gains related to ETFs and others of ¥13.6 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20172019 compared to net business profits + net gains related to ETFs and others of ¥185.7 billion the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018.

Asset Management Company

Gross profits + net gains related to ETFs and others for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019 decreased by ¥60.3¥0.4 billion, or 15.1%0.8%, compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 20162018 to ¥338.5¥49.7 billion.

Asset Management Company

Gross profitsGeneral and administrative expenses for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20172019 were ¥49.6 billion, a decrease of ¥2.5¥27.3 decreased by ¥0.3 billion, or 4.8%1.1%, compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016.2018 to ¥27.3 billion.

Equity in earnings of equity method investees—net for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019 decreased by ¥1.6 billion, or 55.2%, compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018 to ¥1.3 billion.

As a result, net business profits + net gains related to ETFs and others for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019 decreased by ¥1.7 billion, or 9.8%, compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018 to ¥15.7 billion.

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2018 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2017

Retail & Business Banking Company

Gross profits + net gains related to ETFs and others for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018 were ¥726.9 billion, an increase of ¥10.2 billion, or 1.4%, compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017. The increase was attributable mainly to an increase ofnon-interest income such as solution-related revenue and asset management-related revenue which more than offset a decrease of interest income.

General and administrative expenses for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018 increased by ¥5.5 billion, or 0.8%, compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 to ¥724.8 billion.

As a result, net business profits + net gains related to ETFs and others for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018 increased by ¥2.5 billion, or 21.0%, compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 to ¥14.4 billion.

Corporate & Institutional Company

Gross profits + net gains related to ETFs and others for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018 were ¥431.4 billion, a decrease of ¥6.9 billion, or 1.6%, compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017. The decrease was attributable mainly to a decrease in M&A and equity capital markets-related revenue.

General and administrative expenses for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018 increased by ¥2.6 billion, or 1.3%, compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 to ¥202.5 billion.

As a result, net business profits + net gains related to ETFs and others for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018 decreased by ¥9.5 billion, or 4.0%, compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 to ¥229.5 billion.

Global Corporate Company

Gross profits + net gains related to ETFs and others for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018 were ¥340.7 billion, an increase of ¥1.3 billion, or 0.4%, compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017. The increase was attributable mainly to an increase of interest andnon-interest income in Asia offset in part by the stagnation of our solution-related business such as M&A in the Americas.

General and administrative expenses for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018 increased by ¥11.7 billion, or 4.9%, compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 to ¥250.9 billion.

As a result, net business profits + net gains related to ETFs and others for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018 decreased by ¥9.0 billion, or 8.9%, compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 to ¥91.7 billion.

Global Markets Company

Gross profits + net gains related to ETFs and others for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018 were ¥389.2 billion, a decrease of ¥160.1 billion, or 29.1%, compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017. The decrease was attributable mainly to the sluggish growthdecrease of assetsbond-related revenue under management, reflecting weakness inadverse market conditions.

General and administrative expenses for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018 increased by ¥10.0 billion, or 5.2%, compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 to ¥201.2 billion.

As a result, net business profits + net gains related to ETFs and others for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018 decreased by ¥0.8¥170.1 billion, or 47.8%, compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 to ¥185.7 billion.

Asset Management Company

Gross profits + net gains related to ETFs and others for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018 were ¥50.1 billion, an increase of ¥1.3 billion, or 2.7%, compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 to ¥29.3 billion.

As a result, net business profits for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 decreased by ¥1.7 billion, or 7.7%, compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 to ¥20.3 billion.

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2016 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2015

Mizuho Bank

Gross profits for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 were ¥1,463.8 billion, a decrease of ¥31.7 billion, or 2.1%, compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015.2017. The decreaseincrease was attributable mainly to a decrease in income from trading and others due mainly to the appreciation of the yen against the dollar and other major currencies. This decrease was offset in part by increases in gross profits related to our customer groups due to an increase in income mainly in the Americas in international banking and noninterest income from derivative transactions in corporate banking (large corporations).balance of asset formation products.

General and administrative expenses for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20162018 decreased by ¥0.4¥1.7 billion, or 0.0%5.8%, compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 20152017 to ¥833.3¥27.6 billion. The decrease was due mainly to the effects of the appreciation of the yen against the dollar and other major currencies which were generally offset by an increase in strategic expenses related to overseas expansion.

As a result, net business profits + net gains related to ETFs and others for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 decreased2018 increased by ¥31.3¥1.4 billion, or 4.7%8.8%, compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 20152017 to ¥630.5¥17.4 billion.

Mizuho Trust & Banking

Gross profits for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 were ¥166.8 billion, an increase of ¥4.8 billion, or 3.0%, compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015. The increase was attributable to an increase in noninterest income due mainly to gains on sales of Japanese government bonds.

General and administrative expenses for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 increased by ¥4.6 billion, or 4.9%, compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015 to ¥99.1 billion. The increase was attributable mainly to an increase in personnel expenses and tax expenses.

As a result mainly of the foregoing, net business profits for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 decreased by ¥0.3 billion, or 0.5%, compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015 to ¥63.5 billion.

Mizuho Securities

Gross profits for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 were ¥349.2 billion, an increase of ¥11.6 billion, or 3.4%, compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015. The increase was attributable mainly to an increase in trading income and fee and commission income related to underwriting and selling of equity securities and bonds, which reflected our involvement in large business transactions both inside and outside of Japan.

General and administrative expenses for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 increased by ¥11.3 billion, or 4.2%, compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015 to ¥279.3 billion. The increase was due mainly to an increase in personnel expenses and information technology systems-related costs.

As a result, net business profits for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 increased by ¥0.3 billion, or 0.4%, compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015 to ¥69.9 billion.

Geographical Segment Analysis

The following table presents consolidated income statement and total assets information by major geographic area. Foreign activities are defined as business transactions that involve customers residing outside of Japan. However, as our operations are highly integrated globally, we have made estimates and assumptions for the allocation of assets, liabilities, income and expenses among the geographic areas.

 

   Americas           Americas       Asia/Oceania
excluding
Japan,
and others
     
 Japan United
States
 Others Europe Asia/Oceania
excluding
Japan,
and others
 Total   Japan United
States
   Others   Europe   Total 
 (in billions of yen)   (in billions of yen) 

Fiscal year ended March 31, 2015:

      

Total revenue(1)

 ¥2,397  ¥324  ¥102  ¥212  ¥224  ¥3,259 

Total expenses(2)

  1,460   211   24   134   162   1,991 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Income before income tax expense

  937   113   78   78   62   1,268 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net income

 ¥566  ¥80  ¥76  ¥74  ¥34  ¥830 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total assets at end of fiscal year

 ¥127,467  ¥31,075  ¥4,871  ¥10,881  ¥15,820  ¥190,114 

Fiscal year ended March 31, 2016:

      

Total revenue(1)

 ¥2,288  ¥434  ¥46  ¥188  ¥428  ¥3,384 

Total expenses(2)

  1,534   282   29   126   216   2,187 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Income before income tax expense

  754   152   17   62   212   1,197 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net income

 ¥465  ¥137  ¥15  ¥51  ¥182  ¥850 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total assets at end of fiscal year

 ¥133,156  ¥28,985  ¥4,228  ¥11,617  ¥15,824  ¥193,810 

Fiscal year ended March 31, 2017:

                 

Total revenue(1)

 ¥1,748  ¥500  ¥70  ¥191  ¥368  ¥2,877   ¥1,748  ¥500   ¥70   ¥191   ¥368   ¥2,877 

Total expenses(2)

  1,712   303   29   136   216   2,396    1,712  303    29    136    216    2,396 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Income before income tax expense

  36   197   41   55   152   481    36  197    41    55    152    481 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Net income

 ¥6  ¥168  ¥39  ¥39  ¥137  ¥389   ¥6  ¥168   ¥39   ¥39   ¥137   ¥389 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total assets at end of fiscal year

 ¥138,832  ¥30,262  ¥4,203  ¥10,629  ¥16,530  ¥200,456   ¥138,832  ¥30,262   ¥4,203   ¥10,629   ¥16,530   ¥200,456 

Fiscal year ended March 31, 2018:

           

Total revenue(1)

  ¥2,003  ¥655   ¥64   ¥197   ¥448   ¥3,367 

Total expenses(2)

   1,583  479    38    173    255    2,528 
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Income before income tax expense

   420  176    26    24    193    839 
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Net income

  ¥231  ¥153   ¥24   ¥21   ¥173   ¥602 
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total assets at end of fiscal year

  ¥142,588  ¥28,136   ¥4,380   ¥11,678   ¥17,474   ¥204,256 

Fiscal year ended March 31, 2019:

           

Total revenue(1)

  ¥1,705  ¥792   ¥66   ¥250   ¥616   ¥3,429 

Total expenses(2)

   2,082  697    46    203    316    3,344 
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Income before income tax expense

   (377 95    20    47    300    85 
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Net income

  ¥(331 ¥85   ¥17   ¥35   ¥270   ¥76 
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total assets at end of fiscal year

  ¥133,443  ¥25,913   ¥4,825   ¥15,323   ¥18,107   ¥197,611 

 

Notes:

(1)

Total revenue includes interest and dividend income and noninterest income.

(2)

Total expenses include interest expense, provision (credit) for loan losses and noninterest expenses.

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 20172019 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 20162018

In the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, 1.6%2019, we recorded a net loss in Japan. Among the geographical regions in which we recorded net income, 20.9% of ourthe net income was derived from Japan, 43.2% from the United States, 10.0%4.2% from the Americas excluding the United States, 10.0%8.5% from Europe and 35.2%66.4% from Asia/Oceania excluding Japan, and others. At March 31, 2017, 69.3%2019, 67.5% of total assets were allocated to Japan, 15.1%13.1% to the United States, 2.1%2.4% to the Americas excluding the United States, 5.3%7.8% to Europe and 8.2%9.2% to Asia/Oceania excluding Japan, and others.

In Japan, total revenue decreased by ¥540¥298 billion from the previous fiscal year due primarily to a decreasechange from investment gains related to equity securities to investment losses related to equity securities, offset in part by an increase in trading account gains—net. The decreasechange from investment gains related to equity securities to investment losses related to equity securities was due mainly to unrealized losses on Japanese equity securities reflecting the relative weakness in market conditions. The increase in trading account gains—net was due mainly to a decreasean increase in gains

related to changes in the fair value of derivative financial instruments with interest rate swap received/fixed and paid/floating, which resulted from increasesreceive-fixed,pay-variable interest-rate swaps reflecting a decline in marketlong-term interest rates. Total expenses increased by ¥178¥499 billion from the previous fiscal year due mainly to a change from credit to provision for loan losses and an increase in provision for loan losses.general and administrative

expenses. In addition, we had an income tax expense decreased by ¥259benefit of ¥46 billion from the previous fiscal year to ¥30 billionin Japan in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, reflecting2019 compared to an income tax expense of ¥189 billion in the declineprevious fiscal year. The tax benefit was the result of a decrease in taxable income.deferred tax liabilities. As a result, net income in Japan decreased by ¥459¥562 billion to a net loss of ¥331 billion. Total assets in Japan increaseddecreased by ¥5,676¥9,145 billion due primarily to increasesdecreases in loans, interest-bearing deposits in other banks and domestic loans,receivables under securities borrowing transactions, offset in part by a decreasean increase in investment securities.receivables under resale agreements.

In the United States, total revenue increased by ¥66¥137 billion due primarily to increases in interest income from loans,receivables under resale agreements and securities lendingborrowing transactions. The increase in interest income from loansreceivables under resale agreements and resale agreementssecurities borrowing transactions was due mainly to an increase in marketthe average yield reflecting a general increase in U.S. dollar interest rates.rate levels. Total expenses increased by ¥21¥218 billion due mainly to increases in expenses on payables under resalerepurchase agreements and securities lending transactions and deposits, offset in part by a decrease in provision for loan losses.deposits. As a result, net income in the United States increaseddecreased by ¥31¥68 billion. Total assets in the United States increased by ¥1,277 billion due primarily to an increase in interest bearing deposits.

In the Americas excluding the United States, total revenue increased by ¥24 billion due primarily to an increase in other noninterest income, including foreign exchange gains (losses)—net while total expenses were flat. As a result, net income in the Americas excluding the United States increased by ¥24 billion. Total assets in the Americas excluding the United States decreased by ¥25 billion due primarily to a decrease in loans.

In Europe, total revenue increased by ¥3 billion due primarily to increases in interest from loans and trading account assets, offset in part by a decrease in other noninterest income including foreign exchange gains (losses)—net. Total expenses increased by ¥10 billion due mainly to an increase in expenses on deposits. As a result, net income in Europe decreased by ¥12 billion. Total assets in Europe decreased by ¥988¥2,223 billion due primarily to a decrease in trading account assets, offset in part by an increase in receivables under resale agreements.

In the Americas excluding the United States, total revenue increased by ¥2 billion due primarily to an increase in interest bearingincome from loans, offset in part by a decrease in trading account gains—net. Total expenses increased by ¥8 billion due mainly to an increase in expenses on deposits. As a result, net income in the Americas excluding the United States decreased by ¥7 billion. Total assets in the Americas excluding the United States increased by ¥445 billion due primarily to an increase in loans.

In Europe, total revenue increased by ¥53 billion due primarily to an increase in interest from loans. Total expenses increased by ¥30 billion due mainly to increases in expenses on deposits and other noninterest expenses, offset in other banks.part by a change from provision to credit for loan losses. As a result, net income in Europe increased by ¥14 billion. Total assets in Europe increased by ¥3,645 billion due primarily to increases in trading account assets and loans.

In Asia/Oceania excluding Japan, and others, total revenue increased by ¥168 billion due primarily to an increase in interest income from loans. Total expenses increased by ¥61 billion due mainly to an increase in expenses on deposits. As a result, net income in Asia/Oceania excluding Japan, and others increased by ¥97 billion. Total assets in Asia/Oceania excluding Japan, and others increased by ¥633 billion due primarily to an increase in loans, offset in part by a decrease in investment securities.

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2018 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2017

In the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018, 38.5% of our net income was derived from Japan, 25.4% from the United States, 3.9% from the Americas excluding the United States, 3.5% from Europe and 28.7% from Asia/Oceania excluding Japan, and others. At March 31, 2018, 69.8% of total assets were allocated to Japan, 13.8% to the United States, 2.1% to the Americas excluding the United States, 5.7% to Europe and 8.6% to Asia/Oceania excluding Japan, and others.

In Japan, total revenue increased by ¥255 billion from the previous fiscal year due primarily to a change from trading account losses—net to trading account gains—net. The change from trading account losses—net to trading account gains—net was due mainly to an increase in gains related to changes in the fair value of foreign currency-denominated securities. Total expenses decreased by ¥60¥129 billion from the previous fiscal year due mainly to a change from provision to credit for loan losses. In addition, income tax expense increased by ¥159 billion from the previous fiscal year to ¥189 billion in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018. As a result, net income in Japan increased by ¥225 billion. Total assets in Japan increased by ¥3,756 billion due primarily to an increase in investment securities.

In the United States, total revenue increased by ¥155 billion due primarily to increases in interest income from receivables under resale agreements and securities borrowing transactions, interest-bearing deposits and

loans. The increase in interest income from receivables under resale agreements and securities borrowing transactions, interest-bearing deposits and loans was due mainly to an increase in market interest rates. Total expenses increased by ¥176 billion due mainly to increases in expenses on payables under repurchase agreements and securities lending transactions and deposits. As a result, net income in the United States decreased by ¥15 billion. Total assets in the United States decreased by ¥2,126 billion due primarily to a decrease in trading account assets, offset in part by an increase in interest-bearing deposits.

In the Americas excluding the United States, total revenue decreased by ¥6 billion due primarily to a decrease in other noninterest income, including foreign exchange gains (losses)—net, while total expenses were flat. As a result, net income in Asia/Oceania excluding Japan, and others decreased by ¥45 billion. Total assets in Asia/Oceania excluding Japan, and others increased by ¥706 billion due primarily to an increase in interest bearing deposits in other banks.

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2016 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2015

In the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016, 54.7% of our net income was derived from Japan, 16.1% from the United States, 1.8% from the Americas excluding the United States, 6.0% from Europe and 21.4% from Asia/Oceania excluding Japan, and others. At March 31, 2016, 68.7% of total assets were allocated to Japan, 14.9% to the United States, 2.2% to the Americas excluding the United States, 6.0% to Europe and 8.2% to Asia/Oceania excluding Japan, and others.

In Japan, total revenue decreased by ¥109 billion from the previous fiscal year due primarily to a decrease in trading account gains—net, and to a decrease in interest and dividend income. The decrease in trading account gains—net was due mainly to a decrease in gains related to changes in the fair value of foreign currency-denominated securities for which the fair value option was elected, reflecting a decrease in the balance of foreign currency-denominated bonds due to sales and redemptions and the effect of a lower decline in long-term interest rates than in the previous fiscal year, offset in part by an increase in gains related to changes in the fair value of derivative financial instruments used to hedge market risks, mainly interest rate risks, that are not eligible for hedge accounting under U.S. GAAP. The decrease in interest and dividend income was due mainly to a decrease in interest income from domestic loans and investments, which in turn was due mainly to a decrease in the average balance as well as a decrease in the average yield. Total expenses increased by ¥74 billion from the

previous fiscal year due mainly to a decrease in credit for loan losses. In addition, income tax expense decreased by ¥82 billion from the previous fiscal year to ¥289 billion in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016. As a result, net income in Japan decreased by ¥101 billion. Total assets in Japan increased by ¥5,689 billion due primarily to an increase in interest-bearing deposits in other banks, offset in part by a decrease in investment securities.

In the United States, total revenue increased by ¥110 billion due primarily to increases in interest and dividend income and fee and commission. The increase in interest and dividend income was due mainly to an increase in interest income from loans, which in turn was due mainly to an increase in the average balance. The increase in fee and commission was due mainly to an increase in fees related to loan related business. Total expenses increased by ¥71 billion due mainly to increases in provision for loan losses, interest expense on payables under repurchase agreements and securities lending transactions and salaries and employee benefits. As a result, net income in the United States increased by ¥57 billion. Total assets in the United States decreased by ¥2,090 billion due primarily to a decrease in trading account assets.

In the Americas excluding the United States, total revenue decreased by ¥56 billion due primarily to a decrease in trading account gains—net. Total expenses increased by ¥5¥9 billion due mainly to an increase in impairment of goodwill.expenses on deposits. As a result, net income in the Americas excluding the United States decreased by ¥61¥15 billion. Total assets in the Americas excluding the United States decreasedincreased by ¥643¥177 billion due primarily to a decreasean increase in other assets.

In Europe, total revenue decreased by ¥24 billion due primarily to decreases in investment gains—net and interest income from trading account assets, offset in part by increasesa decrease in fee and commission andloans.

In Europe, total revenue increased by ¥6 billion due primarily to an increase in interest income from loans.loans, offset in part by a decrease in interest from trading account assets. Total expenses decreasedincreased by ¥8¥37 billion due mainly to a decreaseincreases in other noninterest expenses.expenses on deposits and provision for loan losses. As a result, net income in Europe decreased by ¥23¥18 billion. Total assets in Europe increased by ¥736¥1,049 billion due primarily to an increaseincreases in loans, offset in part by a decrease in interest-bearing deposits in other banks.trading account assets and loans.

In Asia/Oceania excluding Japan, and others, total revenue increased by ¥204¥80 billion due primarily to an increase in other noninterestinterest income including foreign exchange gains (losses)—net.from loans. Total expenses increased by ¥54¥39 billion due mainly to increasesan increase in interest expenseexpenses on interest-bearing deposits in other banks, and salaries and employee benefits.deposits. As a result, net income in Asia/Oceania excluding Japan, and others increased by ¥148¥36 billion. Total assets in Asia/Oceania excluding Japan, and others increased by ¥4¥944 billion due primarily to increases in trading account assets and investment securities, offset in part by a decreasean increase in loans.

Financial Condition

Assets

Our assets as of March 31, 20162018 and 20172019 were as follows:

 

  As of March 31, Increase
(decrease)
   As of March 31,  Increase
(decrease)
 
  2016 2017   2018 2019 
  (in billions of yen)   (in billions of yen) 

Cash and due from banks

  ¥1,323  ¥1,592  ¥269   ¥1,686  ¥1,404  ¥(282

Interest-bearing deposits in other banks

   35,327   45,995   10,668    46,485  44,269  (2,216

Call loans and funds sold

   894   1,038   144    720  763  43 

Receivables under resale agreements

   7,806   8,968   1,162    8,081  12,997  4,916 

Receivables under securities borrowing transactions

   3,407   3,350   (57   4,409  2,578  (1,831

Trading account assets

   30,021   24,998   (5,023   24,303  21,018  (3,285

Investments

   30,885   24,969   (5,916   26,770  24,163  (2,607

Loans

   77,555   82,284   4,729    83,515  82,800  (715

Allowance for loan losses

   (451  (480  (29   (310 (307 3 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Loans, net of allowance

   77,104   81,804   4,700    83,205  82,493  (712

Premises and equipment—net

   1,838   2,041   203    2,116  1,901  (215

Due from customers on acceptances

   110   184   74    213  187  (26

Accrued income

   273   271   (2   301  343  42 

Goodwill

   19   95   76    95  95   —   

Intangible assets

   49   94   45    84  74  (10

Deferred tax assets

   57   64   7    57  50  (7

Other assets

   4,697   4,993   296    5,731  5,276  (455
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total assets

  ¥193,810  ¥200,456  ¥6,646   ¥204,256  ¥197,611  ¥(6,645
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total assets increaseddecreased by ¥6,646¥6,645 billion from March 31, 20162018 to ¥200,456¥197,611 billion as of March 31, 2017.2019. This increasedecrease was due mainly to an increasedecreases of ¥10,668¥3,285 billion in trading account assets, ¥2,607 billion in investments, ¥2,216 billion in interest-bearing deposits in other banks and ¥1,831 billion in receivables under securities borrowing transactions, offset by an increase of ¥4,700¥4,916 billion in loans, net of allowance, offset in part by a decrease of ¥5,916 billion in investments and a decrease of ¥5,023 billion in trading account assets.

receivables under resale agreements.

Loans

Loans outstanding

The following table shows our loans outstanding as of March 31, 20162018 and 20172019 based on classifications by domicile and industry segment:

 

  As of March 31, Increase
(decrease)
   As of March 31,  Increase
(decrease)
 
  2016 2017   2018 2019 
  (in billions of yen, except percentages)   (in billions of yen, except percentages) 

Domestic:

              

Manufacturing

  ¥8,345   10.7 ¥8,741   10.6 ¥396   (0.1)%   ¥8,156  9.7 ¥9,558  11.5 ¥1,402  1.8

Construction and real estate

   7,734   9.9   7,654   9.3   (80  (0.6   8,102  9.7  8,955  10.8  853  1.1 

Services

   4,656   6.0   4,759   5.8   103   (0.2   5,024  6.0  5,113  6.2  89  0.2 

Wholesale and retail

   5,409   7.0   5,142   6.2   (267  (0.8   5,113  6.1  5,163  6.2  50  0.1 

Transportation and communications

   3,268   4.2   3,491   4.2   223   —      3,565  4.3  3,622  4.4  57  0.1 

Banks and other financial institutions

   3,632   4.7   4,006   4.9   374   0.2    4,471  5.3  4,303  5.2  (168 (0.1

Government and public institutions

   3,395   4.4   8,532   10.3   5,137   5.9    8,882  10.6  2,359  2.8  (6,523 (7.8

Other industries(1)

   4,619   5.9   4,427   5.4   (192  (0.5   5,018  6.0  5,478  6.6  460  0.6 

Individuals

   11,514   14.8   10,905   13.2   (609  (1.6   10,329  12.4  9,858  11.9  (471 (0.5

Mortgage loans

   10,590   13.6   9,965   12.1   (625  (1.5   9,445  11.3  8,950  10.8  (495 (0.5

Other

   924   1.2   940   1.1   16   (0.1   884  1.1  908  1.1  24  0.0 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total domestic

   52,572   67.6   57,657   69.9   5,085   2.3    58,660  70.1  54,409  65.6  (4,251 (4.5

Foreign:

       

Foreign(2):

       

Commercial and industrial

   17,320   22.3   16,872   20.5   (448  (1.8   17,195  20.6  19,087  23.0  1,892  2.4 

Banks and other financial institutions

   6,382   8.2   6,760   8.2   378   —      7,465  8.9  9,126  11.0  1,661  2.1 

Government and public institutions

   1,175   1.5   960   1.2   (215  (0.3   303  0.4  297  0.4  (6 0.0 

Other(1)

   274   0.4   191   0.2   (83  (0.2   38  0.0  33  0.0  (5 0.0 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total foreign

   25,151   32.4   24,783   30.1   (368  (2.3   25,001  29.9  28,543  34.4  3,542  4.5 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Subtotal

   77,723   100.0  82,440   100.0  4,717   —      83,661  100.0 82,952  100.0 (709  —   
   

 

   

 

      

 

   

 

   

Less: Unearned income and deferred loan fees—net

   (168   (156   12     (146  (152  (6 
  

 

   

 

   

 

    

 

   

 

   

 

  

Total loans before allowance for loan losses

  ¥77,555   ¥82,284   ¥4,729    ¥83,515   ¥82,800   ¥(715 
  

 

   

 

   

 

    

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

Note:Notes:

(1)

Other industries” within domestic and “other” within foreignindustries under Domestic include trade receivables and lease receivables of consolidated variable interest entities.

(2)

Certain comparative amounts under Foreign as of March 31, 2018 have been reclassified in order to conform to the current presentation.

Total loans before allowance for loan losses increaseddecreased by ¥4,729¥715 billion from March 31, 20162018 to ¥82,284¥82,800 billion as of March 31, 2017.2019. Loans to domestic borrowers increaseddecreased by ¥5,085¥4,251 billion to ¥57,657¥54,409 billion due mainly to an increasea decrease in loans to government and public institutions, offset in part by a decreasean increase in mortgage loans for individuals.manufacturing.

Loans to foreign borrowers decreasedincreased by ¥368¥3,542 billion from March 31, 20162018 to ¥24,783¥28,543 billion as of March 31, 2017.2019. The decreaseincrease in loans to foreign borrowers was due mainly to decreasesincreases in loans to commercial and industrial and governmentbanks and publicother financial institutions.

Within our loan portfolio, the proportion of loans to domestic borrowers against gross total loans increaseddecreased from 67.6%70.1% to 69.9%65.6%, while that of loans to foreign borrowers against gross total loans decreasedincreased from 32.4%29.9% to 30.1%, and loans34.4%. Loans to foreign borrowers were regionally diversified.

Impaired Loans

General

In accordance with our group’s credit risk management policies, we use an internal rating system that consists of credit ratings for the corporate portfolio segment and pool allocations for the retail portfolio segment as the basis of our risk management infrastructure. Credit ratings consist of obligor ratings which represent the level of credit risk of the obligor, and transaction ratings which represent the ultimate possibility of incurring losses on individual loans by taking into consideration various factors such as collateral or guarantees involved. In principle, obligor ratings are applied to all obligors except those to which pool allocations are applied, and are subject to regular review at least once a year as well as special review which is required whenever the obligor’s credit standing changes. Pool allocations are applied to groups of small balance, homogeneous loans. We poolloans that are less than a specified amount by pooling customers and loans with similar risk characteristics, and the risk is assessed mainly based on past due status and managed according to such pools. We generally review the appropriateness and effectiveness of the approach to obligor ratings and pool allocations once a year in accordance with predetermined policies and procedures. The table below presents our definition of obligor ratings used by Mizuho Bank and Mizuho Trust & Banking:

 

Obligor category(1)(2)

  

Obligor rating(3)

  

Definition

Normal

  A  Obligors whose certainty of debt fulfillment is very high, hence their level of credit risk is very low.
  B  Obligors whose certainty of debt fulfillment poses no problems for the foreseeable future, and their level of credit risk is low.
  C  Obligors whose certainty of debt fulfillment and their level of credit risk pose no problems for the foreseeable future.
  D  Obligors whose current certainty of debt fulfillment poses no problems, however, their resistance to future economic environmental changes is low.

Watch(1)

  E1  Obligors that require observation going forward because of either minor concerns regarding their financial position, or their somewhat weak or unstable business conditions.
  E2  Obligors that require special observation going forward because of problems with their borrowings such as reduced or suspended interest payments, problems with debt fulfillment such as failure to make principal or interest payments, or problems with their financial position as a result of their weak or unstable business conditions.

Intensive control

  F  Obligors that are not yet bankrupt but are in financial difficulties and are deemed likely to become bankrupt in the future because of insufficient progress in implementing their management improvement plans or other measures (including obligors that are receiving ongoing support from financial institutions).
Substantially bankrupt  G  Obligors that have not yet become legally or formally bankrupt but are substantially insolvent because they are in serious financial difficulties and are deemed to be incapable of being restructured.

Bankrupt

  H  Obligors that have become legally or formally bankrupt.

 

Note:Notes:

(1)

Special attention obligors are watch obligors with debt in troubled debt restructuring or 90 days or more delinquent debt. Loans to such obligors are considered impaired.

(2)

We classify loans to special attention, intensive control, substantially bankrupt and bankrupt obligors as impaired loans.

(3)

Equivalent obligor ratings are determined for the other portfolio segment.

We consider loans to be impaired when it is probable that we will be unable to collect all the scheduled payments of principal and interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loans. We classify loans to special attention, intensive control, substantially bankrupt and bankrupt obligors as impaired loans, and all of our impaired loans are designated as nonaccrual loans. We do not have any loans to borrowers that cause management to have serious doubts as to the ability of such borrowers to comply with the present loan repayment terms for the periods presented other than those already designated as impaired loans. See “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Credit, Market and Other Risk—Credit Risk Management” for descriptions of our self-assessment procedures and our internal credit rating system.

Our credit management activities consist of activities such as efforts to provide management consultation to support borrowers’ business initiatives, to increase the quantity and enhance the quality of loan collateral, and to adjust loan balances to an appropriate level, when the borrower’s credit quality is showing a decline. These activities can lead to improvements in obligor classifications through improvements in the business and financial condition of borrowers and, as a result, a reduction in allowance for loan losses.

We endeavor to remove impaired loans from our balance sheet within three years from the time when they are categorized through methods such as collection, charge-offs, disposal and improving the borrowers’ credit rating through restructuring efforts.

Loan modifications

Restructuring efforts are made through our various business revitalization support measures conducted based on requests from borrowers that are in a weakened state that require some form of support. When confronted with the decision of whether to agree to business revitalization support, which includes forgiveness of debt (including debt to equity swaps), reductions in stated interest rates to below market levels and postponement of payment of principal and/or interest (other than insignificant extensions), we carefully consider whether it is beneficial to our shareholders and depositors based on various factors such as whether (i) a legal reorganization process would significantly damage the obligor’s business value so that there is a fear that the obligor will not be able to restructure its business, (ii) the restructuring plan is appropriate and is economically rational from the viewpoint of minimizing Mizuho’s losses compared to other processes, (iii) both the management and shareholders of the obligor will clearly bear responsibility, and (iv) the allocation of losses among creditors is rational and highly justifiable. The triggers and factors that we review to identify restructured loans are modifications imposed by law or a court of law and alterations based on agreement with the borrower such as the reduction of the stated interest rate and forgiveness of debt (including debt to equity swaps), and we consider restructured loans, with respect to which concessions that it would not otherwise consider were granted to obligors in financial difficulty, as “troubled debt restructuring.” We consider the relevant obligor to be in financial difficulty when its rating based on our internal rating system is E2 or below. The types of concessions that we would not otherwise consider include the various forms of business revitalization support described above. In general, troubled debt restructurings will return tonon-impaired loans, as well as accrual status, when we determine that the borrower poses no problems regarding current certainty of debt fulfillment, i.e., the borrower qualifies for a rating of D or above based on our internal rating system. Based on our historical experience, it typically takes approximately 1.5 years for the troubled debt restructuring loans in nonaccrual status to be returned to accrual status.

We determine whether restructured loans other than troubled debt restructurings are impaired loans based on the application of our internal rating system as we do generally with respect to all obligors. We determine whether restructured loans are past due or current by comparing the obligors’ payments with the modified contract terms. The effect of the restructuring on the obligors is considered in developing the allowance based on the restructuring’s effect on the estimation of future cash flows of such loans. At March 31, 2017,2019, the balance of restructurings that are troubled debt restructurings was ¥500¥296 billion, and the balance of restructurings that are not troubled debt restructurings was ¥40¥19 billion. Also, nothe amount of charge-offs were recorded as a result of troubled debt restructurings that were made during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017.2019 was ¥2 billion.

While we maintain basic guidelines covering restructured loans, we do not have any standardized modification programs. Instead, we apply various modifications as is appropriate for the specific circumstances of the obligor in question. We do not have a policy that specifically limits the number of modifications that can be performed for a specific loan.

Balance of impaired loans

The following table shows our impaired loans as of March 31, 20162018 and 20172019 based on classifications by domicile and industry segment:

 

  As of March 31, Increase (decrease)   As of March 31,  Increase (decrease) 
  2016 2017   2018 2019 
  Impaired
loans
   Ratio to gross
total loans by
industry
 Impaired
loans
   Ratio to gross
total loans by
industry
 Impaired
loans
 Ratio to gross
total loans by
industry
   Impaired
loans
   Ratio to gross
total loans by
industry
 Impaired
loans
   Ratio to gross
total loans by
industry
 Impaired
loans
 Ratio to gross
total loans by
industry
 
  (in billions of yen, except percentages)   (in billions of yen, except percentages) 

Domestic:

                  

Manufacturing

  ¥374    4.5 ¥379    4.3 ¥5   (0.2)%   ¥142    1.7 ¥109    1.1 ¥(33 (0.6)% 

Construction and real estate

   77    1.0   57    0.8   (20  (0.2   41    0.5  46    0.5  5  0.0 

Services

   66    1.4   66    1.4   —     —      58    1.2  74    1.4  16  0.2 

Wholesale and retail

   147    2.7   147    2.9   —     0.2    131    2.6  135    2.6  4  0.0 

Transportation and communications

   29    0.9   23    0.6   (6  (0.3   28    0.8  31    0.9  3  0.1 

Banks and other financial institutions

   3    0.1   6    0.2   3   0.1    12    0.3  10    0.2  (2 (0.1

Other industries

   4    0.0   7    0.1   3   0.1    4    0.0  9    0.1  5  0.1 

Individuals

   123    1.1   105    1.0   (18  (0.1   90    0.9  81    0.8  (9 (0.1
  

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

  

Total domestic

   823    1.6   790    1.4   (33  (0.2   506    0.9  495    0.9  (11 0.0 

Foreign

   167    0.7   191    0.8   24   0.1    109    0.4  151    0.5  42  0.1 
  

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

  

Total impaired loans

  ¥990    1.3  ¥981    1.2  ¥(9  (0.1  ¥615    0.7  ¥646    0.8  ¥31  0.1 
  

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

  

Impaired loans decreasedincreased by ¥9¥31 billion from March 31, 20162018 to ¥981¥646 billion as of March 31, 2017.2019. Impaired loans to domestic borrowers decreased by ¥33¥11 billion due primarilymainly to a decreaseimprovements in construction and real estate and individuals.the credit condition of some borrowers in the manufacturing industry. Impaired loans to foreign borrowers increased by ¥24¥42 billion, due primarily to downgrades related to some borrowers, and the relative impact of foreign currency fluctuations on the increasesuch amount was immaterial.

Reflecting the aforementioned change, the percentage of impaired loans within gross total loans decreasedincreased from 1.3%0.7% as of March 31, 20162018 to 1.2%0.8% as of March 31, 20172019 due to a decreasean increase in impaired loans. The percentage of impaired loans net of allowance for loan losses to gross total loans net of allowance for loan losses decreasedincreased from 0.70%0.37% as of March 31, 20162018 to 0.61%0.41% as of March 31, 20172019 due to a decreasean increase in impaired loans whereas gross total loans andnet of allowance for loan losses increased.and a decrease in gross total loans net of allowance for loan losses.

Allowance for Loan Losses

Calculation of allowance for loan losses

Our self-assessment and credit-rating procedures serve as the basis for determining the amount of the allowance for loan losses. The specific methods of calculating the allowance for each category of obligors are as follows:

 

Normal and watch obligors

A formula allowance is calculated separately for obligors with small balance, homogeneous loans and for each credit rating category of corporate obligors by multiplying the loan balance with the applicable

default ratio (based on internal historical data as well as data provided by third-party credit rating agencies) and the applicable average impairment ratio on defaulted loans (based on internal historical data).

Special attention obligors

The allowance for special attention obligors is generally calculated individually based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s initial effective interest rate. A formula allowance for certain special attention obligors is calculated by grouping the loans to such obligors and applying the formula described above for normal and watch obligors but using the default ratio and average impairment ratio specific to this category.

 

Intensive control obligors

The allowance for intensive control obligors is generally calculated individually based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s initial effective interest rate, based on the loan’s observable market price, or based on the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. The allowance for certain intensive control obligors is calculated by grouping the loans to such obligors and multiplying the amount of loans less estimated collateral value by the default ratio and average impairment ratio specific to this category.

 

Substantially bankrupt and bankrupt obligors

The allowance is calculated individually and is equal to loan balance, less estimated collateral value.

Balance of allowance for loan losses

The following table summarizes the allowance for loan losses by component and as a percentage of the corresponding loan balance as of March 31, 20162018 and 2017:2019:

 

  As of March 31, Increase
(decrease)
   As of March 31,  Increase
(decrease)
 
        2016             2017         2018 2019 
  (in billions of yen, except percentages)   (in billions of yen, except percentages) 

Allowance for loan losses on impaired loans(1) (A)

  ¥289  ¥303  ¥14   ¥153  ¥169  ¥16 

Allowance for loan losses onnon-impaired loans (B)

   162   177   15    157  138  (19
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total allowance for loan losses (C)

   451   480   29   ¥310  ¥307  ¥(3
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Impaired loans requiring an allowance for loan losses (D)

   861   851   (10  ¥478  ¥529  ¥51 

Impaired loans not requiring an allowance for loan losses (E)

   129   130   1    137  117  (20

Non-impaired loans(2) (F)

   76,733   81,459   4,726    83,046  82,306  (740
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Gross total loans (G)

  ¥77,723  ¥82,440  ¥4,717   ¥83,661  ¥82,952  ¥(709
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Percentage of allowance for loan losses on impaired loans against the balance of impaired loans requiring an allowance (A)/(D) x100

   33.59  35.55  1.96   31.87 31.99 0.12

Percentage of allowance for loan losses onnon-impaired loans against the balance ofnon-impaired loans (B)/(F) x100

   0.21   0.22   0.01    0.19  0.17  (0.02

Percentage of total allowance for loan losses against gross total loans (C)/(G) x100

   0.58   0.58   —      0.37  0.37  0.00 

 

Notes:

(1)

The allowance for loan losses on impaired loans includes the allowance for groups of small balance, homogeneous loans totaling ¥348¥246 billion and ¥302¥257 billion as of March 31, 20162018 and 20172019, which were collectively evaluated for impairment, in addition to the allowance for those loans that were individually evaluated for impairment.

(2)

Non-impaired loans refer to loans categorized as “normal obligors” and “watch obligors (excluding special attention obligors)” under our internal rating system.

Allowance for loan losses increaseddecreased by ¥29¥3 billion from March 31, 20162018 to ¥480¥307 billion as of March 31, 20172019 due to increasesa decrease in allowance for loan losses onnon-impaired loans, offset in part by an increase in allowance for loan losses on bothimpaired loans. The allowance for loan losses onnon-impaired loans decreased due mainly to upgrades in the obligor categories of a broad range of borrowers, reflecting the continuing gradual recovery of the Japanese economy. The allowance for loan losses on impaired loans andnon-impairedincreased due mainly to an increase in allowance for loan losses on foreign impaired loans. As a result, the percentage of allowance for loan losses on impaired loans against the balance of impaired loans requiring an allowance increased by 1.960.12 percentage points to 35.55%, whereas the31.99%. The percentage of total allowance for loan losses against gross total loans andwas unchanged as the percentagerate of decrease in allowance for loan losses onnon-impaired loans against the balance ofnon-impaired loans were at the same level compared tomatched that of March 31, 2016.the decrease in gross total loans.

In the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017,2019, impaired loans decreasedincreased by 0.9%5.0% due mainly to a decreasean increase in domesticforeign impaired loans. Allowance for loan losses on impaired loans increased by 4.6%11.0%.

The coverage ratio for impaired loans, increasedcalculated as the percentage of total allowance for loan losses against total impaired loans, decreased by 3.3%2.82 percentage points as of March 31, 20172019 compared to the previous fiscal year. The increasedecrease was due to howan increase in impaired loans decreased while gross total loans and a decrease in allowance for loan losses increased.losses.

Provision (credit) for loan losses

The following table summarizes changes in our allowance for loan losses, including a breakdown of charge-offs and recoveries by domicile and industry segment, in the fiscal years ended March 31, 20162018 and 2017:2019:

 

  Fiscal years ended March 31,  Increase
(decrease)
 
      2016          2017      
  (in billions of yen) 

Allowance for loan losses at beginning of fiscal year

 ¥520  ¥451  ¥(69

Provision (credit) for loan losses

  35   38   3 

Charge-offs:

   

Domestic:

   

Manufacturing

  (37  (2  35 

Construction and real estate

  (2  (1  1 

Services

  (4  (3  1 

Wholesale and retail

  (14  (6  8 

Transportation and communications

  (5  (1  4 

Individuals

  (8  (7  1 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total domestic charge-offs

  (70  (20  50 

Foreign

  (42  (11  31 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total charge-offs

  (112  (31  81 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Recoveries:

   

Domestic:

   

Manufacturing

  2   1   (1

Construction and real estate

  1   2   1 

Services

  2   1   (1

Wholesale and retail

  8   5   (3

Transportation and communications

  1   4   3 

Individuals

  2   3   1 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total domestic recoveries

  16   16   —   

Foreign

  5   10   5 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total recoveries

  21   26   5 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net charge-offs

  (91  (5  86 

Others(1)

  (13  (4  9 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at end of fiscal year

 ¥451  ¥480  ¥29 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

  Fiscal years ended March 31,  Increase
(decrease)
 
      2018          2019     
  (in billions of yen) 

Allowance for loan losses at beginning of fiscal year

 ¥480  ¥310  ¥(170

Provision (credit) for loan losses

  (126  32   158 

Charge-offs:

   

Domestic:

   

Manufacturing

  (6  (4  2 

Construction and real estate

  —     (1  (1

Services

  (5  (2  3 

Wholesale and retail

  (12  (10  2 

Transportation and communications

  (1  —     1 

Other industries

  —     (2  (2

Individuals

  (5  (5  —   
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total domestic charge-offs

  (29  (24  5 

Foreign

  (27  (24  3 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total charge-offs

  (56  (48  8 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Recoveries:

   

Domestic:

   

Manufacturing

  1   1   —   

Construction and real estate

  1   1   —   

Services

  2   1   (1

Wholesale and retail

  1   3   2 

Banks and other financial institutions

  1   —     (1

Individuals

  2   1   (1
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total domestic recoveries

  8   7   (1

Foreign

  7   7   —   
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total recoveries

  15   14   (1
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net charge-offs

  (41  (34  7 

Others(1)

  (3  (1  2 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at end of fiscal year

 ¥310  ¥307  ¥(3
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

Note:

(1)

“Others” includes primarily foreign exchange translation.

Provision for loan losses increased by ¥3 billion from March 31, 2016 to ¥38 billion at March 31, 2017. Although obligor categories improved asWe recorded a whole, reflecting the gradual recovery in the economic environment, provision for loan losses increasedof ¥32 billion in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019 compared to a credit for loan losses of ¥126 billion in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018. The change was due mainly to the deteriorationabsence of the significant reversal that was recorded in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018 related to improvements in the credit statuscondition of certainsome domestic borrowers.

Charge-offs decreased by ¥81¥8 billion from the previous fiscal year to ¥31¥48 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017.2019. The decrease was due mainly to a decrease in charge-offs of domestic loans mainly in connection with the restructuring of certain domestic borrowers.loans.

Investments

The majority of our investments areavailable-for-sale andheld-to-maturity securities, which at March 31, 20162018 and 20172019 were as follows:

 

 As of March 31, Increase (decrease)  As of March 31,  Increase (decrease) 
 2016 2017  2018 2019 
 Amortized
cost
 Fair
value
 Net
unrealized
gains
(losses)
 Amortized
cost
 Fair
value
 Net
unrealized
gains
(losses)
 Amortized
cost
 Fair
value
 Net
unrealized
gains
(losses)
  Amortized
cost
 Fair
value
 Net
unrealized
gains
(losses)
 Amortized
cost
 Fair
value
 Net
unrealized
gains
(losses)
 Amortized
cost
 Fair
value
 Net
unrealized
gains
(losses)
 
 (in billions of yen)  (in billions of yen) 

Available-for-sale securities:

         

Debt securities

 ¥21,516  ¥21,672  ¥156  ¥16,684  ¥16,756  ¥72  ¥(4,832 ¥(4,916 ¥(84

Available-for-sale securities(1):

         

Debt securities:

         

Japanese government bonds

  15,672   15,763   91   10,257   10,263   6   (5,415  (5,500  (85 ¥13,334  ¥13,332  ¥(2 ¥11,889  ¥11,897  ¥8  ¥(1,445 ¥(1,435 ¥10 

Other than Japanese government bonds

  5,844   5,909   65   6,427   6,493   66   583   584   1  6,253  6,301  48  6,205  6,236  31  (48 (65 (17

Equity securities (marketable)

  1,664   3,781   2,117   1,530   3,801   2,271   (134  20   154 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 ¥23,180  ¥25,453  ¥2,273  ¥18,214  ¥20,557  ¥2,343  ¥(4,966 ¥(4,896 ¥70  ¥19,587  ¥19,633  ¥46  ¥18,094  ¥18,133  ¥39  ¥(1,493 ¥(1,500 ¥(7
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Held-to-maturity securities:

                  

Debt securities:

                  

Japanese government bonds

  3,760   3,817   57   3,060   3,097   37   (700  (720  (20 ¥1,960  ¥1,984  ¥24  ¥1,120  ¥1,140  ¥20  ¥(840 ¥(844 ¥(4

Agency mortgage-backed securities

  1,059   1,056   (3  757   750   (7  (302  (306  (4 558  538  (20 484  470  (14 (74 (68 6 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 ¥4,819  ¥4,873  ¥54  ¥3,817  ¥3,847  ¥30  ¥(1,002 ¥(1,026 ¥(24 ¥2,518  ¥2,522  ¥4  ¥1,604  ¥1,610  ¥6  ¥(914 ¥(912 ¥2 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Note:

(1)

Equity securities (marketable) were excluded fromavailable-for-sale securities as of March 31, 2018 to align with current period presentation.

Available-for-sale securities measured at fair value decreased by ¥4,896¥1,500 billion from March 31, 20162018 to ¥20,557¥18,133 billion at March 31, 2017.2019. This decrease was due primarily to a decrease in Japanese government bonds.Held-to-maturity securities measured at amortized cost decreased by ¥914 billion from March 31, 2018 to ¥1,604 billion at March 31, 2019. This decrease was due primarily to a decrease in Japanese government bonds due to the sales and redemptions as a result of our risk management activities related to our bond portfolio.Held-to-maturity securities measured at amortized cost decreased by ¥1,002 billion from March 31, 2016 to ¥3,817 billion at March 31, 2017.redemptions. See note 4 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report for details of other investments included within investments.

The amount of our funding through deposits significantly exceeds our total loans. As a result, we allocate a significant portion of such excess among investments in debt securities, including Japanese government bonds and investments in equity securities consisting mainly of common stock of Japanese listed company customers. We will continue our efforts to dispose of cross-shareholdings in order to decrease the potential impact on our financial position due to fluctuations in stock prices, and to be able to fully perform financial intermediary functions even under periods of stress.

Fluctuations in long-term interest rates lead to changes in the fair value of our portfolio of debt securities, a vast majority of which consists of Japanese government bonds. As of March 31, 2017,2019, we had a total of

¥16,756 ¥18,133 billion ofavailable-for-sale debt securities within our investments, of which ¥10,263¥11,897 billion was Japanese government bonds. We had ¥21,672¥19,633 billion and ¥16,756¥18,133 billion ofavailable-for-sale debt securities measured at fair value as of March 31, 20162018 and 2017,2019, respectively, and net unrealized gains of ¥156¥46 billion and ¥72¥39 billion were reflected in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax as of such dates, respectively. As the negative interest rate policy of the Bank of Japan started in February 2016 and the resulting fluctuations in interest rates may have a substantial impact on the value of our Japanese government bond portfolio, in order to prepare for the risk of sudden and significant future interest rate change, we continue to manage our Japanese government bond portfolio conservatively by managing the average remaining period of our portfolio and strengthening risk management, including through the use of internal stress tests. Average remaining period of our Japanese government bond portfolio as of March 31, 20172019 was approximately 2.4 years.2.1 years compared to 2.5 years as of March 31, 2018.

Risk management related to our securities portfolio continues to be a key focus in light of the increase in instability and uncertainty in the global economy in recent years.

Trading Account Assets

Trading account assets decreased by ¥5,023¥3,285 billion from March 31, 20162018 to ¥24,998¥21,018 billion at March 31, 2017.2019. The decrease was due mainly to settlements of derivatives in a reduction in market value of receive-fixed, pay-variable interest-rate swaps reflecting a rise in long-term interest ratesgain position and decreases in U.S. treasury bonds and other foreign government bonds for which the fair value option was elected due to sales and redemptions.

Cash and Due from Banks

Cash and due from banks increased by ¥269 billion from March 31, 2016 to ¥1,592 billion at March 31, 2017. The increase was due to net cash provided by financing activities of ¥11,870 billion and net cash provided by operating activities of ¥1,213 billion offset in part by net cash used in investing activities of ¥12,802 billion.

Liabilities

The following table shows our liabilities as of March 31, 20162018 and 2017:2019:

 

  As of March 31,   Increase
(decrease)
   As of March 31,   Increase
(decrease)
 
  2016   2017     2018   2019 
  (in billions of yen)   (in billions of yen) 

Deposits

  ¥117,937   ¥131,185   ¥13,248   ¥136,884   ¥138,297   ¥1,413 

Due to trust accounts

   4,467    4,123    (344   3,993    312    (3,681

Call money and funds purchased

   2,521    1,255    (1,266   2,105    2,842    737 

Payables under repurchase agreements

   16,833    17,970    1,137    16,657    14,640    (2,017

Payables under securities lending transactions

   2,845    1,919    (926   1,833    1,798    (35

Other short-term borrowings

   2,080    1,477    (603   1,688    1,995    307 

Trading account liabilities

   17,111    13,592    (3,519   13,115    10,121    (2,994

Bank acceptances outstanding

   110    184    74    213    187    (26

Income taxes payable

   97    74    (23   65    59    (6

Deferred tax liabilities

   202    140    (62   306    108    (198

Accrued expenses

   181    209    28    233    289    56 

Long-term debt

   14,766    14,529    (237   12,955    11,529    (1,426

Other liabilities

   6,477    5,027    (1,450   4,705    5,933    1,228 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total liabilities

  ¥185,627   ¥191,684   ¥6,057   ¥194,752   ¥188,110   ¥(6,642
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total liabilities increaseddecreased by ¥6,057¥6,642 billion from March 31, 20162018 to ¥191,684¥188,110 billion at March 31, 2017.2019. This increasedecrease was due primarily to an increasedecreases of ¥13,248¥4,689 billion in deposits, offset in part by a decrease of ¥3,519short-term borrowings and ¥2,994 billion in trading account liabilities, and a decreaseoffset in part by an increase of ¥2,002¥1,413 billion in short-term borrowings.deposits. We

analyze short-term borrowings, consisting of due to trust accounts, call money and funds purchased, payables under repurchase agreements, payables under securities lending transactions and other short-term borrowings, on a combined basis.

Deposits

The following table shows a breakdown of our deposits as of March 31, 20162018 and 2017:2019:

 

  As of March 31,   Increase
(decrease)
   As of March 31,   Increase
(decrease)
 
  2016   2017     2018   2019 
  (in billions of yen)   (in billions of yen) 

Domestic:

            

Noninterest-bearing deposits

  ¥16,108   ¥19,064   ¥2,956   ¥21,069   ¥23,845   ¥2,776 

Interest-bearing deposits

   79,596    87,359    7,763    91,207    84,019    (7,188
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total domestic deposits

   95,704    106,423    10,719    112,276    107,864    (4,412
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Foreign:

            

Noninterest-bearing deposits

   1,601    1,996    395    2,257    1,794    (463

Interest-bearing deposits

   20,632    22,766    2,134    22,351    28,639    6,288 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total foreign deposits

   22,233    24,762    2,529    24,608    30,433    5,825 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total deposits

  ¥117,937   ¥131,185   ¥13,248   ¥136,884   ¥138,297   ¥1,413 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Deposits increased by ¥13,248¥1,413 billion from March 31, 20162018 to ¥131,185¥138,297 billion at March 31, 2017.2019. Domestic deposits increaseddecreased by ¥10,719¥4,412 billion from March 31, 20162018 to ¥106,423¥107,864 billion at March 31, 2017.2019. Domestic interest-bearing deposits increaseddecreased by ¥7,763¥7,188 billion from March 31, 20162018 to ¥87,359¥84,019 billion at March 31, 20172019 due mainly to an increasedecreases in ordinary deposits offset in partand other deposits, and domestic noninterest-bearing deposits increased by decreases¥2,776 billion to ¥23,845 billion at March 31, 2019. Foreign deposits increased by ¥5,825 billion from March 31, 2018 to ¥30,433 billion at March 31, 2019 due mainly to increases in time deposits and certificates of deposit, and domestic noninterest-bearing deposits increased by ¥2,956 billion to ¥19,064 billion at March 31, 2017 due mainly to increases in current accounts andnon-interest-bearing ordinary deposits. Foreign deposits increased by ¥2,529 billion from March 31, 2016 to ¥24,762 billion at March 31, 2017 due mainly to an increase in time deposits, offset in part by a decrease in certificates of deposit.

Short-term Borrowings

The following table shows a breakdown of our short-term borrowings as of March 31, 20162018 and 2017:2019:

 

 As of March 31, Increase (decrease)  As of March 31,  Increase (decrease) 
 2016 2017  2018 2019 
 Domestic Foreign Total Domestic Foreign Total Domestic Foreign Total  Domestic Foreign Total Domestic Foreign Total Domestic Foreign Total 
 (in billions of yen)  (in billions of yen) 

Due to trust accounts

 ¥4,467  ¥—    ¥4,467  ¥4,123  ¥—    ¥4,123  ¥(344 ¥—    ¥(344 ¥3,993  ¥—    ¥3,993  ¥312  ¥—    ¥312  ¥(3,681 ¥—    ¥(3,681

Call money and funds purchased, and payables under repurchase agreements and securities lending transactions

  7,182   15,017   22,199   5,727   15,417   21,144   (1,455  400   (1,055 6,724  13,871  20,595  7,294  11,986  19,280  570  (1,885 (1,315

Other short-term borrowings

  981   1,099   2,080   587   890   1,477   (394  (209  (603 827  861  1,688  926  1,069  1,995  99  208  307 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total short-term borrowings

 ¥12,630  ¥16,116  ¥28,746  ¥10,437  ¥16,307  ¥26,744  ¥(2,193 ¥191  ¥(2,002 ¥11,544  ¥14,732  ¥26,276  ¥8,532  ¥13,055  ¥21,587  ¥(3,012 ¥(1,677 ¥(4,689
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Short-term borrowings decreased by ¥2,002¥4,689 billion from March 31, 20162018 to ¥26,744¥21,587 billion at March 31, 2017.2019. Domestic short-term borrowings decreased by ¥2,193¥3,012 billion due mainly to decreasesa decrease in call money and funds purchased, and securities lending transactions.due to trust accounts. Foreign short-term borrowings increaseddecreased by ¥191¥1,677 billion due mainly to an increasea decrease in payables under repurchase agreements, offset in part by a decrease in other short-term borrowings and call money and funds purchased.

agreements.

Trading Account Liabilities

Trading account liabilities decreased by ¥3,519¥2,994 billion from March 31, 20162018 to ¥13,592¥10,121 billion at March 31, 2017.2019. The decrease was due mainly to an increasesettlements of derivatives in market value ofreceive-variable,pay-fixed interest-rate swaps reflecting a rise in long-term interest rates.loss position.

Equity

The following table shows a breakdown of equity as of March 31, 20162018 and 2017:2019:

 

  As of March 31, Increase
(decrease)
   As of March 31,  Increase
(decrease)
 
  2016 2017   2018 2019 
  (in billions of yen)   (in billions of yen) 

MHFG shareholders’ equity:

        

Preferred stock(1)

  ¥99  ¥—    ¥(99

Common stock

   5,703   5,826   123   ¥5,826  ¥5,830  ¥4 

Retained earnings

   747   919   172    1,306  2,741  1,435 

Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax

   1,469   1,521   52    1,742  164  (1,578

Treasury stock, at cost

   (4  (5  (1   (6 (8 (2
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total MHFG shareholders’ equity

   8,014   8,261   247    8,868  8,727  (141

Noncontrolling interests

   169   511   342    636  774  138 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total equity

  ¥8,183  ¥8,772  ¥589   ¥9,504  ¥9,501  ¥(3
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total equity as of March 31, 2019 was almost unchanged compared to those as of the end of the previous fiscal year due mainly to a decrease in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax, offset by increases in retained earnings and noncontrolling interests.

Note:

(1)In July 2016, all shares of the eleventh series class XI preferred stock were converted into common stock and cancelled.

EquityRetained earnings increased by ¥589¥1,435 billion from March 31, 20162018 to ¥8,772 billion due mainly to increases in noncontrolling interests and retained earnings.

Common stock increased by ¥123 billion from March 31, 2016 to ¥5,826¥2,741 billion at March 31, 2017 primarily as a result of the issuance of new shares of common stock related to the conversion of preferred stock to common stock.

Retained earnings increased by ¥172 billion from March 31, 2016 to ¥919 billion at March 31, 2017.2019. This increase was due to the cumulative effect of change in accounting principles, net of tax of ¥1,540 billion due primarily to adoption of ASUNo.2016-01, as described in note 2 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report, and net income attributable to MHFG shareholders for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20172019 of ¥362¥84 billion, offset in part by dividend payments of ¥190 billion.

Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax increaseddecreased by ¥52¥1,578 billion from March 31, 20162018 to ¥1,521¥164 billion at March 31, 20172019 due primarily to an increasethe cumulative effect of the above-mentioned change in net unrealized gains onavailable-for-sale securitiesaccounting principles of ¥52 billion, an increase in pension liability adjustments of ¥12 billion and a decrease in foreign currency translation adjustments of ¥12¥1,535 billion.

Treasury stock, at cost as of March 31, 2017 was the same level compared to that as of March 31, 2016.

Noncontrolling interests increased by ¥342¥138 billion from March 31, 20162018 to ¥511¥774 billion at March 31, 2017.2019. The increase was due mainly to a new consolidationan increase in net assets of certainsome investment funds.

funds in which we invest.

Liquidity

We continuously endeavor to enhance the management of our liquidity profile to meet our customers’ loan demand and deposit withdrawals and respond to unforeseen situations such as adverse movements in stock, foreign currencies, interest rates and other markets or changes in general domestic or international conditions. We manage our liquidity profile through the continuous monitoring of our cash flow situation, the enforcement of upper limits on funds raised in financial markets and other means as further set forth in “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk—Credit, Market and Other Risk—Liquidity Risk Management—Liquidity Risk Management Structure.Management.

Deposits, based on our broad customer base and brand recognition in Japan, have been our primary source of liquidity. Our total deposits increased by ¥13,248¥1,413 billion, or 11.2%1.0%, from the end of the previous fiscal year to ¥131,185¥138,297 billion as of March 31, 2017.2019. Our average balance of deposits for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20172019 of ¥126,097¥137,727 billion exceeded our average balance of loans for the same period by ¥46,755¥53,793 billion. We invested the excess portion primarily in marketable securities and other high liquidity assets.

Secondary sources of liquidity include short-term borrowings such as call money and funds purchased and payables under repurchase agreements. We also issue long-term debt, including both senior and subordinated debt, as additional sources for liquidity. We utilize short-term borrowings to diversify our funding sources and to manage our funding costs. We raise subordinated long-term debt for the purpose of improving our capital adequacy ratios, which also enhances our liquidity profile. We believe we are able to access such sources of liquidity on a stable and flexible basis based on our current credit ratings. The following table shows credit ratings assigned to us and to our principal banking subsidiaries by S&P and Moody’s as of May 31, 2017:2019:

 

   As of May 31, 20172019
   S&P  Moody’s
   Long-term  Short-term  Stand-alone
credit profile
  Long-term  Short-term  Baseline credit
assessment

Mizuho Financial Group

  A-  —          A1  P-1    

Mizuho Bank

  A  A-1  a  A1  P-1  baa1

Mizuho Trust & Banking

  A  A-1  a  A1  P-1  baa1

We source our funding in foreign currencies primarily from corporate customers, foreign governments, financial institutions and institutional investors, through short-term and long-term financing, under terms and pricing commensurate with our credit ratings above, and customer deposits. In the event of future declines in our credit quality or that of Japan in general, we expect to be able to purchase foreign currencies in sufficient amounts using the yen funds raised through our domestic customer base. As further measures to support our foreign currency liquidity, we hold foreign debt securities, maintain credit lines and swap facilities denominated in foreign currencies and pledge collateral to the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank to support future credit extensions.currencies.

In order to maintain appropriate funding liquidity, our principal banking subsidiaries hold highly liquid investment assets such as Japanese government bonds as liquidity reserve assets. We monitor the amount of liquidity reserve assets and report such amount to the Risk Management Committee, the Balance Sheet Management Committee, the Executive Management Committee and the President & Group CEO on a regular basis. Minimum regulatory reserve amounts, or the reserve amount deposited with the Bank of Japan pursuant to applicable regulations that is calculated as a specified percentage of the amount of deposits held by our principal banking subsidiaries, are excluded in connection with our management of liquidity reserve asset levels. We established and apply classifications for the cash flow conditions affecting the group, including the amount of liquidity reserve assets, that range from “Normal” to “Anxious” and “Crisis” categories, and take appropriate actions based on such conditions. As of March 31, 2017,2019, the balance of Japanese government bonds included within our investments and measured at fair value was ¥10.3¥11.9 trillion (excludingheld-to-maturity securities), and a majority of this amount, which has historically not fluctuated significantly over the course of a fiscal year, was classified as the principal component of liquidity reserve assets.

Related to regulatory liquidity requirements, the liquidity coverage ratio (“LCR”) standard has been introduced in Japan. The minimum LCR under the LCR guidelines is 100% on both a consolidated andnon-consolidated basis for banks with international operations or on a consolidated basis for bank holding companies with international operations, while it is subject tophase-in arrangements pursuant to which the LCR rises in equal annual steps of 10 percentage points to reach 100% on January 1, 2019, with a minimum requirement of 80% applicable for the period between January 1 and December 31, 2017. The LCR disclosure guidelines of the Financial Service Agency requires banks and bank holding companies with international operations to disclose the three-month averages of daily LCR from the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, as opposed to the disclosure of three-month averages ofend-of-month LCR that began on June 30, 2015 as a transitional arrangement. Set forth below are the three-month averages of thedaily-end daily end balances of consolidated LCR data of Mizuho Financial Group, and consolidated andnon-consolidated LCR data of our principal banking subsidiaries, for the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017.2019. All yen figures in this table are truncated.

 

   
Fourth Quarter of Fiscal Year
Ended March 31, 2017
 
   (in billions of yen,
except percentages)
 

Mizuho Financial Group (Consolidated)

  

Total high-quality liquid assets (“HQLA”) allowed to be included in the calculation (weighted)

  ¥59,034 

Net cash outflows (weighted)

   45,611 

LCR

   129.4% 

Mizuho Bank (Consolidated)

  

Total HQLA allowed to be included in the calculation (weighted)

  ¥52,705 

Net cash outflows (weighted)

   36,509 

LCR

   144.4% 

Mizuho Bank(Non-consolidated)

  

Total HQLA allowed to be included in the calculation (weighted)

  ¥52,127 

Net cash outflows (weighted)

   35,538 

LCR

   146.7% 

Mizuho Trust and Banking (Consolidated)

  

Total HQLA allowed to be included in the calculation (weighted)

  ¥2,432 

Net cash outflows (weighted)

   1,827 

LCR

   133.5% 

Mizuho Trust and Banking(Non-consolidated)

  

Total HQLA allowed to be included in the calculation (weighted)

  ¥2,410 

Net cash outflows (weighted)

   1,816 

LCR

   133.0% 
Fourth quarter of fiscal year
ended March 31, 2019

(in billions of yen,

except percentages)

Mizuho Financial Group (Consolidated)

Total high-quality liquid assets (“HQLA”) allowed to be included in the calculation (weighted)

¥59,797

Net cash outflows (weighted)

41,447

LCR

144.3

Mizuho Bank (Consolidated)

Total HQLA allowed to be included in the calculation (weighted)

¥55,706

Net cash outflows (weighted)

39,148

LCR

142.4

Mizuho Bank(Non-consolidated)

Total HQLA allowed to be included in the calculation (weighted)

¥55,115

Net cash outflows (weighted)

38,365

LCR

143.8

Mizuho Trust and Banking (Consolidated)

Total HQLA allowed to be included in the calculation (weighted)

¥2,674

Net cash outflows (weighted)

1,663

LCR

162.4

Mizuho Trust and Banking(Non-consolidated)

Total HQLA allowed to be included in the calculation (weighted)

¥2,612

Net cash outflows (weighted)

1,530

LCR

171.8

For more information on LCR, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—Supervision and Regulation—Liquidity.”

Capital Adequacy

All yen figures and percentages in this subsection are truncated. Accordingly, the total of each column of figures may not be equal to the total of the individual items.

Regulatory Capital Requirements

Mizuho Financial Group and its principal banking subsidiaries are subject to regulatory capital requirements administered by the Financial Services Agency in accordance with the provisions of the Banking Act and related regulations. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements may initiate certain mandatory actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

The capital adequacy guidelines applicable to Japanese banks and bank holding companies with international operations supervised by the Financial Services Agency closely follow the risk-adjusted approach proposed by BCBS and are intended to further strengthen the soundness and stability of Japanese banks. In December 2010, BCBS issued the Basel III rules text (later revised in June 2011, January 2013, October 2014 and October 2014)December 2017), which presents the details of global regulatory standards on bank capital adequacy and liquidity agreed by the Governors and Heads of Supervision, which is the oversight body of BCBS, and endorsed by the G20 Leaders at the Seoul summit in November 2010. The rules text sets out higher and better-quality capital, better risk coverage, the introduction of a leverage ratio as a backstop to the risk-based requirement, and the introduction of the capital conservation buffer and countercyclical capital buffer as measures to promote thebuild-up of capital that can be drawn down in periods of stress, and the introduction of two global liquidity standards. The Financial Services Agency’s revisions to its capital adequacy guidelines became effective from March 31, 2013, which generally reflect the rules in the Basel III rules text that have been applied from January 1, 2013. The framework of Basel III is based on the following three pillars: minimum capital requirements; supervisory review; and market discipline. Under the first pillar, the capital ratio is calculated by dividing regulatory capital, or risk-based capital, by risk-weighted assets. Under the second pillar, banks are required to maintain adequate capital to support all of the major risks in their business and are encouraged to develop and use better risk management techniques in monitoring and managing such risks. Under the third pillar, banks are required to enhance disclosure, including disclosure of details of the capital adequacy ratio, the amount of each type of risk and the method of calculation used so that the market may make more effective evaluations.

With regard to risk-based capital, the guidelines based on Basel III set out higher and better-quality capital standards compared to those under Basel II, which had been effective until Basel III was applied. The guidelines based on Basel III require a target minimum standard capital adequacy ratio of 8%, Tier 1 capital ratio of 6% and Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 4.5%, on both a consolidated andnon-consolidated basis for banks with international operations, such as Mizuho Bank and Mizuho Trust & Banking, or on a consolidated basis for bank holding companies with international operations, such as Mizuho Financial Group.

Risk-based capital, calculated from financial statements prepared under Japanese GAAP, is classified into the following two tiers: Tier 1 capital; and Tier 2 capital. Tier 1 capital consists of Common Equity Tier 1 capital and Additional Tier 1 capital. Common Equity Tier 1 capital generally consists of common stock, capital surplus, retained earnings, accumulated other comprehensive income and other disclosed reserves and others less any regulatory adjustments. Additional Tier 1 capital generally consists of instruments issued by a bank or its holding company that meet the criteria for inclusion in Additional Tier 1 capital and others less any regulatory adjustments. Tier 2 capital generally consists of instruments issued by a bank or its holding company such as subordinated debt that meet the criteria for inclusion in Tier 2 capital, general reserve for possible losses on loans (equaling the sum of (i) the excess of the amount of qualified reserves over the amount of expected losses and (ii) the amount of general reserves calculated based on the standardized approach) and others less any regulatory adjustments. Regulatory adjustments such as goodwill and other intangibles, and defined benefit pension fund assets and liabilities, are to be applied mainly to the calculation of Common Equity Tier 1 capital in the form of deductions.

Under Basel III, capital instruments that no longer qualify as Additional Tier 1 capital or Tier 2 capital are being phased out beginning March 2013 by increments of 10% until becoming fully effective in March 2022. Our existing preferred securities (the amounts thereof included within Additional Tier 1 capital as of March 31,

20172019 being ¥577.5¥303.0 billion) and existing subordinated debt issued before March 2013 (the amounts thereof included within Tier 2 capital as of March 31, 20172019 being ¥842.1¥506.1 billion) are subject to thephase-out arrangements.

In November 2011, the Financial Stability Board (“FSB”) published policy measures to address the systemic and moral hazard risks associated with systemically important financial institutions. The policy measures include requirements for global systemically important banksG-SIBs(“G-SIBs”) to have additional loss absorption capacity tailored to the impact of their default, ranging from 1% to 2.5% of risk-weighted assets, to be met with Common Equity Tier 1 capital, which would be in addition to the 7.0% Common Equity Tier 1 capital requirement (including capital conservation buffer). The requirements began phasing in from January 2016 and will be fully implemented by January 2019. We were included in the list ofG-SIBs updated in November 20162018 and were allocated to the category that would require 1.0% of additional loss absorbency.

In November 2015, the Financial Services Agency published the revised capital adequacy guidelines to introduce the Basel III rules text regarding the capital conservation buffer, the countercyclical capital buffer and the additional loss absorption capacity requirement forG-SIBs and domestic systemically important banks(“D-SIBs”). These guidelines became effective on March 31, 2016. The capital conservation buffer, the countercyclical capital buffer and the additional loss absorption capacity requirement forG-SIBs andD-SIBs must be met with Common Equity Tier l capital under the revised guidelines, and if such buffer and requirement are not satisfied, a capital distribution constraints plan is required to be submitted to the Financial Services Agency and carried out. The capital conservation buffer is being phased in starting in March 2016 at 0.625% until becomingbecame fully effective in March 2019 at 2.5%. In addition, subject to national discretion by the respective regulatory authorities, if the relevant national authority judges a period of excess credit growth to be leading to thebuild-up of system-wide risk, a countercyclical capital buffer ranging from 0% to 2.5% would also be imposed on banking organizations. The countercyclical capital buffer is a weighted average of the buffers deployed across all the jurisdictions to which the banking organization has credit exposures.

In December 2015, the Financial Services Agency published a capital adequacy guideline regarding the designation ofG-SIBs andD-SIBs in Japan. We were designated as both a global systemically important bank(“G-SIB”)G-SIB and a domestic systemically important bank(“D-SIB”),D-SIB, and the additional loss absorption capacity requirement applicable to us was 1.0% on a fully effective basis. The additional loss absorption capacity requirement was the same as that imposed by the FSB, which is being phased in starting in March 2016 at 0.25% until becomingbecame fully effective in March 2019 at 1.0%.

The Leverage Ratio framework is critical and complementary to the risk-based capital framework that will help ensure broad and adequate capture of bothon- andoff-balance sheet sources of banks’ leverage. This simple,non-risk-based measure is intended to restrict thebuild-up of excessive leverage in the banking sector to avoid destabilizing deleveraging processes that can damage the broader financial system and the economy. Implementation of the leverage ratio requirements began with bank-level reporting to national supervisors of the leverage ratio and its components, and public disclosure is required from January 2015. Basel III’s leverage ratio is defined as the “capital measure” (numerator) divided by the “exposure measure” (denominator) and is expressed as a percentage. The capital measure is currently defined as Tier 1 capital, and the minimum leverage ratio is currently defined as 3%. BCBS will monitor banks’

The Financial Services Agency applied the requirement to meet the minimum leverage ratio datafor bank holding companies and banks with international operations from March 31, 2019. The minimum leverage ratio is defined as 3% on a consolidated basis for bank holding companies with international operations, such as Mizuho Financial Group, or on both a consolidated andnon-consolidated basis for banks with international operations, such as Mizuho Bank and Mizuho Trust & Banking.

Related to regulatory capital requirements, in orderNovember 2015, the FSB issued the final TLAC standard forG-SIBs. The TLAC standard has been designed so that failingG-SIBs will have sufficient loss-absorbing and recapitalization capacity available in resolution for authorities to assess whetherimplement an orderly resolution.G-SIBs are required to meet the designTLAC requirement alongside the minimum regulatory requirements set out in the Basel III framework.

Following the publication of the final TLAC standards forG-SIBs by the FSB, in April 2016, the Financial Services Agency published an explanatory paper outlining its approach for the introduction of the TLAC framework in Japan, and calibrationa revised version of this document was published in April 2018. In March 2019, the Financial Services Agency published regulatory notices and related materials to implement the TLAC requirements in Japan, which is phased in for JapaneseG-SIBs from March 31, 2019. According to the Financial Services Agency’s approach above, which is subject to change based on future international discussions, the preferred resolution strategy for Covered SIBs is SPE resolution, in which resolution tools are applied to the ultimate holding company of a group by a single national resolution authority, although the actual measures to be taken will be determined on acase-by-case basis considering the actual condition of the relevant Covered SIB in crisis. To implement this SPE resolution strategy effectively under the FSB’s final TLAC standards and the Japanese TLAC requirements, the ultimate holding company in Japan of the relevant Covered SIB designated as the resolution entity in Japan of such Covered SIB by the Financial Services Agency (the “Domestic Resolution Entity”) are required to (i) meet the minimum external TLAC requirements, and (ii) cause their material subsidiaries or materialsub-groups that are designated as systemically important by the Financial Services Agency or that are subject to TLAC requirements or similar requirements by the relevant foreign authority to maintain a certain level of capital and debt recognized as having loss-absorbing and recapitalization capacity, or internal TLAC. Under the Japanese TLAC regulations, the Financial Services Agency designated Mizuho Financial Group as the Domestic Resolution Entity, and designated Mizuho Bank, Mizuho Trust & Banking and Mizuho Securities as Mizuho Financial Group’s material subsidiaries in Japan. External TLAC eligible instruments generally consist of instruments issued by the Domestic Resolution Entity of the relevant Covered SIB that meet the criteria for inclusion in external TLAC requirements and others less any regulatory adjustments. Internal TLAC eligible instruments generally consist of instruments issued by the material subsidiaries of the relevant Covered SIBs as systemically important by the Financial Services Agency, which are subject to the internal TLAC requirements such as subordinated debt that meet the criteria for inclusion in internal TLAC requirements and others less any regulatory adjustments.

Under the Japanese TLAC regulations,G-SIBs are required to meet a minimum TLAC requirement of at least 16% of the resolution group’s risk-weighted assets as from March 31, 2019 and at least 18% as from March 31, 2022. Minimum TLAC must also be at least 6% of the Basel III leverage ratio denominator from March 31, 2019, and at least 6.75% from March 31, 2022. In addition, JapaneseG-SIBs are allowed to count the Japanese Deposit Insurance Fund Reserves in an amount equivalent to 2.5% of their consolidated risk-weighted assets from March 31, 2019, and 3.5% of their consolidated risk-weighted assets from March 31, 2022, as their external TLAC. For more information regarding the Japanese TLAC regulations, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—Supervision and Regulation—Total Loss Absorbing Capacity.”

In December 2017, the BCBS published the finalized Basel III reforms endorsed by the Group of Central Bank Governors and Heads of Supervision. The finalized reforms complement the initial phase of Basel III reforms, seek to restore credibility in the calculation of risk-weighted assets and improve the comparability of banks’ capital ratios. In addition, under the finalized Basel III reforms,G-SIBs are required to meet a leverage ratio buffer, which will take the form of a Tier 1 leverage ratiocapital buffer set at 50% of 3% is appropriate. Any final adjustmentsthe applicableG-SIB’s risk-weighted capital buffer from January 1, 2022, and various refinements are made to the definition and calibration of the leverage ratio exposure measure based on the text of the leverage ratio framework issued by the BCBS in January 2014. The revised framework will mainly take effect from January 1, 2022, and the revisions to the capital floor will be made by 2017, with a view to migrate to a Pillar 1 (minimum capital requirements) treatment onphased in from January 1, 2018, based on appropriate review and calibration.

Regulatory adjustments such as goodwill and other intangibles, and defined benefit pension fund assets and liabilities, are to be applied mainly to2022, with the calculationinitial capital floor of Common Equity Tier 1 capital in the form of the deductions. The regulatory adjustments began at 20% of the required deductions in the calculation of Common Equity Tier 1 capital in March 201450%, and will be increased by 20% increments per year through March 2018 whenfully implemented at 72.5% from January 1, 2027. The leverage ratio requirements under the regulatory adjustments reach 100%. During this transition period,finalized definition of the remainder not deductedleverage ratio exposure measure and the leverage ratio buffer requirement forG-SIBs, will take effect from capital will continue to be subject to existing national treatments.January 1, 2022. For more information, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—Supervision and Regulation—Capital Adequacy” and “Item 4. Information on the Company—Supervision and Regulation—Leverage Ratio.”

The capital requirements and regulatory adjustments are being phased in over a transitional period as follows (italicized percentages indicate those still in transition periods):

 

 March
2016
 March
2017
 March
2018
 March
2019
 March
2020
 March
2021
 March
2022
   March
2018
 March
2019
 March
2020
 March
2021
 March
2022
 

Minimum Common Equity Tier 1 capital

  4.5  4.5  4.5  4.5  4.5  4.5  4.5   4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5

Minimum Tier 1 capital

  6.0  6.0  6.0  6.0  6.0  6.0  6.0   6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0

Minimum total capital

  8.0  8.0  8.0  8.0  8.0  8.0  8.0   8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0

Phase out of recognition of capital instruments that no longer qualify as capital

   40.0  30.0  20.0  10.0 0.0

Capital conservation buffer

  0.625  1.25  1.875  2.5  2.5  2.5  2.5   1.875 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5

Phase out of recognition of capital instruments that no longer qualify as capital

  60.0  50.0  40.0  30.0  20.0  10.0  0.0

Phase-in of deductions from capital

  60.0  80.0  100.0  100.0  100.0  100.0  100.0

Countercyclical capital buffer(1)

   0.01 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05

Additional loss absorbency requirements forG-SIBs andD-SIBs(1)(2)

  0.25  0.50  0.75  1.0  1.0  1.0  1.0   0.75 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0

Minimum Leverage Ratio

   3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.5%(2) 

 

Note:Notes:

(1)

Figures assume that the countercyclical capital buffer will continue to be 0.05% after March 2019.

(2)

Figures assume that the additional loss absorbency requirements applied to us as aG-SIB andD-SIB continue to be 1.0% on a fully effective basis.

If the capital adequacy ratio or the leverage ratio of a financial institution falls below the required level, the Financial Services Agency may, depending upon the extent of capital deterioration, take certain corrective action, including requiring the financial institution to submit an improvement plan to strengthen its capital base, reduce its total assets, restrict its business operations or other actions that could have a material effect on its financial condition and results of operations. If the capital conservation buffer, the countercyclical capital buffer and the additional loss absorption capacity requirement forG-SIBs andD-SIBs are not satisfied, a capital distribution constraints plan is required to be submitted to the Financial Services Agency and carried out. The capital distribution constraints plan is required to be considered reasonable to restore the capital buffer and include restrictions on capital distributions, such as dividends, share buybacks and bonuses payments, up to a certain amount as determined depending on the level of the capital buffer.

Unless otherwise specified, the regulatory capital information set forth in this “—Capital Adequacy” is based on the current Basel III rules.

Consolidated Capital Adequacy Ratios and Leverage Ratios

Our capital adequacy ratios and leverage ratios as of March 31, 20162018 and 2017,2019, calculated in accordance with Japanese GAAP and the guidelines established by the Financial Services Agency, were as set forth in the following table:

 

  As of March 31, Increase
(decrease)
   As of  Increase
(decrease)
 
  2016 2017   March 31,
2018
 March 31,
2019
 
  (in billions of yen, except percentages)   (in billions of yen, except percentages) 

Common Equity Tier 1 capital

  ¥6,566.4  ¥7,001.6  ¥435.1   ¥7,437.0  ¥7,390.0  ¥(46.9

Additional Tier 1 capital

   1,338.6   1,209.8   (128.7   1,755.1  1,842.1  86.9 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Tier 1 capital

   7,905.0   8,211.5   306.4    9,192.2  9,232.1  39.9 

Tier 2 capital

   1,733.5   1,839.4   105.8    1,668.1  1,685.3  17.1 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total capital

  ¥9,638.6  ¥10,050.9  ¥412.3   ¥10,860.4  ¥10,917.5  ¥57.0 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Risk-weighted assets

  ¥62,531.1  ¥61,717.1  ¥(814.0  ¥59,528.9  ¥57,899.5  ¥(1,629.4

Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio

   10.50  11.34  0.84   12.49 12.76 0.27

Required Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio(1)

   5.375   6.25   0.875    7.135 8.05 0.915

Tier 1 capital ratio

   12.64   13.30   0.66    15.44 15.94 0.50

Required Tier 1 capital ratio(1)

   6.875   7.75   0.875    8.635 9.55 0.915

Total capital ratio

   15.41   16.28   0.87    18.24 18.85 0.61

Required total capital ratio(1)

   8.875   9.75   0.875    10.635 11.55 0.915

CET1 available after meeting the bank’s minimum capital requirements

   7.99 8.26 0.27

Leverage ratio

   3.98   3.95   (0.03   4.28 4.42 0.14

 

Note:

(1)

The required ratios disclosed above, atas of March 31, 20162018 and 2017,2019, include the transitional capital conservation buffer of 0.625%1.875% and 1.25%2.5%, respectively, the countercyclical capital buffer of 0.01% and 0.05%, respectively, and the transitional additional loss absorbency

requirements forG-SIBs andD-SIBs of 0.25%0.75% and 0.5%1.00%, respectively, which are bothall in addition to the regulatory minima. The respective required amounts are determined by applying the ratios to the sum of the risk weightedrisk-weighted assets and certain other risk amounts. These bufferbuffers and additional loss absorbency requirements are applied to us but not to our banking subsidiaries.

Our total capital ratio as of March 31, 20172019 was 16.28%18.85%, an increase of 0.870.61 percentage points compared to March 31, 2016.2018. Our Tier 1 capital ratio as of March 31, 20172019 was 13.30%15.94%, an increase of 0.660.50 percentage points compared to March 31, 2016.2018. The increases in our total capital ratio and Tier 1 capital ratio were due mainly to an increase in Additional Tier 1 capital and a decrease in the risk-weighted assets. Our Additional Tier 1 capital increased due mainly to an increase in directly-issued qualifying Additional Tier 1 instruments which classified as liabilities. Our Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio as of March 31, 20172019 was 11.34%12.76%, an increase of 0.840.27 percentage points compared to March 31, 2016. The increases in each ratio were due mainly to a decrease in risk-weighted assets and to an increase in Common Equity Tier 1 capital.2018. Our Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio increased due mainly to an increase in retained earnings. Our risk-weighted assets decreasedspite of a decrease in Common Equity Tier 1 capital due mainly to a decrease in credit risktherisk-weighted assets. We believe that we were in compliance with all capital adequacy requirements to which we were subject as of March 31, 2017.2019.

Principal Banking Subsidiaries

Capital adequacy ratios and leverage ratios of our principal banking subsidiaries, on a consolidated basis, as of March 31, 20162018 and 2017,2019, calculated in accordance with Japanese GAAP and the guidelines established by the Financial Services Agency, were as set forth in the following table:

 

  As of March 31, Increase
(decrease)
   As of  Increase
(decrease)
 
  2016 2017   March 31,
2018
 March 31,
2019
 

Mizuho Bank

        

Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio

   10.81  11.16  0.35   12.34 12.60 0.26

Tier 1 capital ratio

   12.75   13.34   0.59    15.61 16.06 0.45

Total capital ratio

   15.46   16.20   0.74    18.52 19.02 0.50

Leverage ratio

   4.19   4.16   (0.03   4.53 4.44 (0.09)% 

Mizuho Trust & Banking

        

Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio

   18.21   18.73   0.52    19.99 23.67 3.68

Tier 1 capital ratio

   18.21   18.73   0.52    20.05 23.70 3.65

Total capital ratio

   19.52   19.47   (0.05   20.28 23.87 3.59

Leverage ratio

   5.86   6.74   0.88    7.03 6.55 (0.48)% 

We believe each of our principal banking subsidiaries was in compliance with all capital adequacy requirements to which it was subject as of March 31, 2017.2019.

Our securities subsidiariessubsidiary in Japan areis also subject to the capital adequacy requirement under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act. Under this requirement, securities firms must maintain a minimum capital adequacy ratio of 120% calculated as a percentage of capital accounts less certain assets, as determined in accordance with Japanese GAAP, against amounts equivalent to market, counterparty and basic risks. Specific guidelines are issued as a ministerial ordinance that details the definition of essential components of the capital ratios, including capital, disallowed assets and risks, and related measures. Failure to maintain a minimum capital ratio will trigger mandatory regulatory actions. A capital ratio of less than 140% will call for regulatory reporting and a capital ratio of less than 100% may lead to a temporary suspension of all or part of the business operations and further, to the cancellation of the license to act as a securities broker and dealer. We believe, as of March 31, 2017,2019, that our securities subsidiariessubsidiary in Japan werewas in compliance with all capital adequacy requirements to which they wereit was subject.

Off-balance-sheet Arrangements

We engage in various types ofoff-balance-sheet arrangements in the ordinary course of our business to meet the financing needs of our customers. These arrangements include various guarantees and commitments. The following tables show the contractual or notional amounts of our guarantees and undrawn commitments as of March 31, 20162018 and 2017:2019:

 

  As of March 31,   Increase
(decrease)
   As of March 31,   Increase
(decrease)
 
  2016   2017     2018   2019 
  (in billions of yen)   (in billions of yen) 

Guarantees:

                                                   

Performance guarantees

  ¥2,110   ¥2,243   ¥133   ¥2,165   ¥2,307   ¥142 

Guarantees on loans

   297    278    (19   241    289    48 

Guarantees on securities

   203    175    (28   164    145    (19

Other guarantees

   1,571    1,823    252    2,210    2,324    114 

Guarantees for the repayment of trust principal

   1,141    730    (411   709    65    (644

Liabilities of trust accounts

   12,747    15,177    2,430    13,861    362    (13,499

Derivative financial instruments

   15,792    14,415    (1,377   11,654    14,170    2,516 

   As of March 31,   Increase
(decrease)
 
   2016   2017   
   (in billions of yen) 

Commitments:

      

Commitments to extend credit

  ¥75,742   ¥76,678   ¥936 

Commercial letters of credit

   448    522    74 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total commitments

  ¥76,190   ¥77,200   ¥1,010 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   As of March 31,   Increase
(decrease)
 
   2018   2019 
   (in billions of yen) 

Commitments:

                                             

Commitments to extend credit

  ¥78,448   ¥76,857   ¥(1,591

Commercial letters of credit

   690    778    88 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total commitments

  ¥79,138   ¥77,635   ¥(1,503
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

See note 24 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report for the description of the nature of the various types of guarantees and commitments.

The contractual or notional amounts of these instruments generally represent the maximum potential amounts of future payments without consideration of possible recoveries under recourse provisions or from collateral held. For example, the amount under commitments to extend credit does not necessarily equal the impact that such commitment will have on our future cash flow, because many of these commitments expire without our making actual credit extensions up to the full commitment amount or at all. Also, many of the agreements related to the commitments to extend credit include terms that allow us to refuse, or reduce the amount of, credit extensions based on changes in the financial environment, declines in the obligor’s credit quality and other reasons. Finally, we receive collateral such as real estate and securities at the time of the contract as we deem necessary, and we regularly review the credit quality of the customer based on the internal guidelines and revise the terms of the contract as we deem necessary to manage credit risks.

Some of ouroff-balance-sheet arrangements are related to activities of special purpose entities, most of which are variable interest entities. For further information, see note 25 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.

Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations

In the normal course of business, we enter into contractual obligations that require future cash payments. The following table sets forth a summary of our contractual cash obligations as of March 31, 2017:2019:

 

  Due in one
year or less
   Due from
one year to
two years
   Due from
two years to
three years
   Due from
three years to
four years
   Due from
four years to
five years
   Due after
five years
   Total   Due in one
year or less
   Due from
one year to
two years
   Due from
two years to
three years
   Due from
three years to
four years
   Due from
four years to
five years
   Due after
five years
   Total 
  (in billions of yen)   (in billions of yen) 

Time deposits

  ¥37,565   ¥2,113   ¥1,213   ¥350   ¥347   ¥142   ¥41,730   ¥38,766   ¥1,775   ¥1,391   ¥321   ¥383   ¥257   ¥42,893 

Certificates of deposit

   10,420    95    56    60    —      —      10,631    12,961    314    64    —      —      —      13,339 

Long-term debt

   1,614    3,127    1,734    1,841    1,195    5,018    14,529    1,401    1,443    1,319    1,177    509    5,680    11,529 

Capitalized leases

   11    10    9    6    3    2    41    10    7    4    3    1    —      25 

Operating leases

   52    46    41    35    31    58    263    51    41    35    25    24    297    473 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total(1)(2)

  ¥49,651   ¥5,381   ¥3,044   ¥2,286   ¥1,573   ¥5,218   ¥67,153   ¥53,179   ¥3,573   ¥2,809   ¥1,523   ¥916   ¥6,234   ¥68,234 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

Notes:

(1)

A contribution paid to our pension plans, which is not included in the above table, is expected to be approximately ¥51¥52 billion in the fiscal year ending March 31, 2018,2020, based on the current funded status and expected asset return assumptions. For further information, see note 21 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.

(2)

The amount of unrecognized tax benefits, which is not included in the above table, was ¥1.9¥12.3 billion, of which ¥0.7¥2.2 billion was interest and penalties, atas of March 31, 2017.2019. For further information, see note 20 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See note 2 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.

Reconciliation with Japanese GAAP

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles and policies as summarized in note 1 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report. These principles and policies differ in some respects from Japanese GAAP. UnderFor reporting based on Japanese banking regulations, we are required to reportprepare our annual financial results using financial statements prepared underin accordance with Japanese GAAP. In addition, pursuant to the Japanese securities law and the requirements of the Tokyo Stock Exchange, we prepare quarterly financial statements which are also under Japanese GAAP. To show the major reconciling items between our U.S. GAAP financial statements and our Japanese GAAP financial statements, we have provided below, with respect to our most recent fiscal year, a reconciliation of consolidated net income and shareholders’ equity under U.S. GAAP with those amounts under Japanese GAAP.

 

  As of and for the fiscal
year ended March 31,  2017
   As of and for the fiscal
year ended March 31, 2019
 
  Total MHFG
shareholders’
equity
 Net income
attributable
to MHFG
shareholders
   Total MHFG
shareholders’
equity
 Net income
attributable
to MHFG
shareholders
 
  (in billions of yen)   (in billions of yen) 

U.S. GAAP

  ¥8,261.4  ¥362.4   ¥8,726.5  ¥84.5 

Differences arising from different accounting for:

      

1. Derivative financial instruments and hedging activities

   43.4   218.9    58.5  (42.3

2. Investments

   11.6   112.2    (68.2 267.9 

3. Loans

   160.8   (2.5   173.2  11.9 

4. Allowances for loan losses andoff-balance-sheet instruments

   86.0   13.8    85.4  5.8 

5. Premises and equipment

   (84.1  (28.6   (423.7 (304.2

6. Land revaluation

   181.4   (3.0   171.1  (7.4

7. Business combinations

   (72.1  (14.3   (74.1 13.1 

8. Pension liabilities

   120.0   (34.0   127.9  32.2 

9. Consolidation of variable interest entities

   41.8   14.0    59.0  28.1 

10. Deferred taxes

   (223.1  (40.6   (101.2 6.8 

11. Foreign currency translation

   —     4.8    —    (1.3

12. Other

   (3.1  0.4    15.1  1.5 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Japanese GAAP

  ¥8,524.0(1)  ¥603.5   ¥8,749.5(1)  ¥96.6 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

 

Note:

(1)

Includes total accumulated other comprehensive income and stock acquisition rights

The following is a summary of the significant adjustments made to consolidated shareholders’ equity and net income, as shown in the above table, to reconcile the U.S. GAAP results with the Japanese GAAP results. The paragraphs below refer to the corresponding items set forth in the table above.

1.    Derivative financial instruments and hedging activities

Under U.S. GAAP, for a derivative to qualify for hedge accounting, it must be highly effective in achieving offsetting changes in fair values or variable cash flows of the hedged items attributable to the particular risk being hedged. The hedging relationship must be designated and formally documented at inception. Such documentation must include the particular risk management objective and strategy for the hedge, the identification of the derivative used as the hedging instrument, the hedged item and the risk exposure being hedged and the method for assessing the hedge effectiveness. The criteria for designation and measurement of hedge effectiveness under U.S. GAAP are more rigorous than under Japanese GAAP. As a result, most of the eligible hedge derivatives under Japanese GAAP are accounted for as trading account assets or liabilities under U.S. GAAP with changes in fair value of the derivatives recognized in earnings.

Requirements for bifurcation of embedded derivatives differ between Japanese GAAP and U.S. GAAP. Embedded derivatives that are deemed to be clearly and closely related to their host contracts are not bifurcated under U.S. GAAP, while Japanese GAAP allows an entity to bifurcate embedded derivatives if the entity manages the risk of the embedded derivatives and host contracts separately. Bifurcated derivatives are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in earnings under both Japanese GAAP and U.S. GAAP.

2.    Investments

The cost basis of certain investments differs between Japanese GAAP and U.S. GAAP primarily due to the following reasons:

Certain sales and subsequent repurchasesUnder U.S. GAAP, equity securities (except those accounted for under the equity method ofavailable-for-sale securities accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee) are measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in earnings, while under Japanese GAAP, do not meet sales criteria underthose securities are measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in other comprehensive income.

Under U.S. GAAP. These salesGAAP, we report foreign currency denominated debt securities as trading securities, and subsequent repurchases resultedthe entire amount of changes in realized gains or losses beingtheir fair values are recognized in earnings, while under Japanese GAAP. Under U.S. GAAP, these gains or lossesonly the changes attributable to movements in foreign currency exchange rates are recognized as unrealized gains or losses within accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax.in earnings.

Under U.S. GAAP, declines in the fair value ofavailable-for-sale securities below cost that are deemed to be “other-than-temporary” are recorded in earnings. Both quantitative and qualitative factors are considered to determine whether the impairment is “other-than-temporary,“other-than-temporary. including the duration and extent of the decline, near-term prospects of the issuer, as well as our ability and intent to hold the investments until a forecasted recovery of fair value or maturity. Regarding debt securities, we consider additional factors such as whether we have the intent to sell or more likely than not will be required to sell before recovery to determine whether the impairment is “other-than-temporary.” In other cases, we evaluate expected cash flows to be received and determine if a credit loss exists, and if so, the amount of an other-than-temporary impairment related to the credit loss is recognized in earnings. Under Japanese GAAP, significant declines in the fair value of securities below cost that are deemed to be “other-than-temporary” are recorded in earnings unless short term recovery is reasonably expected. A decline in the fair value of a security of 50% or more of its cost is a strong indicator of an other-than-temporary decline, which requires compelling evidence to prove otherwise. A decline in the fair value of 30% or more but less than 50% of its cost is an indicator of an other-than-temporary decline, in which case the probability of recovery must be evaluated to determine whether an other-than-temporary decline has occurred. Generally, if the decline in the fair value is less than 30%, it is not considered to be an other-than-temporary decline.

Under U.S. GAAP, the election of the fair value option for financial assets and liabilities is permitted according to ASC 825, while it is not permitted under Japanese GAAP. As we elected the fair value option for foreign currency denominatedavailable-for-sale securities under U.S. GAAP, these securities were reclassified as trading securities, and the entire amount of changes in their fair values are recognized in earnings, while under Japanese GAAP, only the changes attributable to movements in foreign currency exchange rates are recognized in earnings.

3.    Loans

Under U.S. GAAP, loan origination fees, net of certain direct origination costs, are deferred and recognized in interest income over the contractual life of the relevant loan using the interest method, while certain fees and costs are recognized in earnings at the time the loan is originated under Japanese GAAP.

In addition, certain loan participations and sales of loans to special purpose vehicles in connection with asset securitization transactions under Japanese GAAP do not meet sales criteria under U.S. GAAP due to different applicable criteria, and therefore the relevant loans are recognized on the balance sheet under U.S. GAAP.

4.    Allowances for loan losses andoff-balance-sheet instruments

Under both Japanese GAAP and U.S. GAAP, the allowance for loan losses for specifically identified impaired loans is based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s initial

effective interest rate or, as a practical expedient, the loan’s observable market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. For certain impaired loans that are aggregated for the purpose of

measuring impairment, pools of smaller balance homogeneous loans and othernon-homogeneous loans that have not been identified as impaired, the allowance for loan losses is determined based on a formula allowance utilizing historical loss factors, as adjusted, considering recent trends.

The differences between Japanese GAAP and U.S. GAAP arise from the difference in the scope of the loans that are subject to the individual and portfolio impairment analysis. In addition to these effects based on differences between Japanese GAAP and U.S. GAAP, provision (credit) for loan losses may differ between Japanese GAAP and U.S. GAAP due to the difference in the timing of accounting closingspublic filings between our consolidated financial statements under U.S. GAAP and those under Japanese GAAP.

This reconciling item also includes the differences between U.S. GAAP and Japanese GAAP relating to the allowance foroff-balance-sheet instruments. We generally use the same methodology to reserve for losses on these instruments as we do for loans.

5.    Premises and equipment

Under Japanese GAAP, a company can elect to allocateentity-wide long-lived assets that do not have identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of the cash flows of other assets and liabilities, among individual divisions within an entity, whereas U.S. GAAP does not have such an election. Under Japanese GAAP, we made this election for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019.

Under U.S. GAAP, the fair value of anon-monetary asset acquired in exchange for anothernon-monetary asset is generally deemed to be the new cost of the asset acquired in the exchange, and a gain or loss is recognized on the exchange. Under Japanese GAAP, the cost of the asset surrendered is assigned to the newly acquired asset in certain types of exchange transactions, resulting in no gains or losses.

With regard tointernal-use software, under U.S. GAAP, the costs to develop or obtain software that allow for access to or conversion of old data by new systems are capitalized and amortized once the software is ready for its intended use, while they are expensed when it occursafter full implementation across the company under Japanese GAAP. On the other hand, the general and administrative costs and the overhead costs are expensed as the costs ofinternal-use software under U.S. GAAP, but they are capitalized under Japanese GAAP.

6.    Land revaluation

Under Japanese GAAP, we revalued our holdings of land during the fiscal year ended March 31, 1998 pursuant to the Act Concerning Revaluation of Land (Act No. 34 of 1998). The revaluation gains are recorded directly in equity, and the related deferred tax liabilities are also recognized. Under U.S. GAAP, there is no applicable provision that allows for the revaluation of land other than for impairments, and accordingly the revaluation gains are reversed.

7.    Business combinations

Under U.S. GAAP, goodwill is not amortized and an impairment loss is recorded to the extent the carrying amount of the goodwill exceeds its estimated fair value at the measurement date. Under Japanese GAAP, goodwill is amortized over an appropriate period not to exceed 20 years and an impairment loss is recorded only if the effects of the goodwill are no longer expected.

8.    Pension liabilities

Under Japanese GAAP, we adopted as of April 1, 2000 pension accounting that is based on the actuarial present value of accrued benefit obligations. The cumulative effect of the accounting change was amortized over a specified number of years, and actuarial gains and losses are amortized over a specified number of years. Under

U.S. GAAP, we recalculated the benefit obligation at April 1, 2004 and accounted for the obligation as if we had adopted the accounting method in accordance with ASC 715, “Compensation—Retirement Benefits,” beginning in the fiscal year ended March 31, 1990, as permitted for a foreign private issuer. The cumulative effect of the accounting change, as well as actuarial gains and losses since the adoption, had been fully amortized by April 1, 2004.

Under both Japanese GAAP and U.S. GAAP, an employer is required to recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of a defined benefit plan as an asset or liability in its consolidated balance sheets. Actuarial gains or losses and prior service costs or benefits that have not yet been recognized through earnings as net periodic benefit cost are recognized in other comprehensive income, net of tax, until they are amortized as a component of net periodic benefit cost. Actuarial gains or losses are amortized based on the corridor approach according to ASC 715 under U.S. GAAP, while they are amortized over a specified number of years under Japanese GAAP. Due mainly to the differences in the balances of actuarial gains or losses and prior service costs or benefits and in amortization methods, there are differences in the amounts of shareholders’ equity and net income between U.S. GAAP and Japanese GAAP.

Under U.S. GAAP, we enhanced the calculation of the benefit obligations by refining the anticipated future mortality rate assumption improvement in the calculation.

During the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018 and 2019, a subsidiary of ours partially withdrew assets from employee retirement benefit trusts, which were established for the payment of employees’ severance pay and retirement pensions. Under U.S. GAAP, no gains or losses have been recognized as a consequence of this transaction.

See note 21 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report for further discussion.

9.    Consolidation of variable interest entities

Under U.S. GAAP, variable interest entities are to be consolidated if we are deemed to be the primary beneficiary of the variable interest entity. Under Japanese GAAP, consolidation is not based on variable interests. We consolidate certain variable interest entities, such as entities related to asset-backed securitizations, investments in securitization products and investment funds. See note 25 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report for further discussion.

10.    Deferred taxes

Under U.S. GAAP, all available evidence, both positive and negative, must be considered to determine whether, based on the weight of that evidence, deferred tax assets are realizable or whether a valuation allowance is needed. Possible sources of taxable income, which are considered to determine whether deferred tax assets are realizable, include net unrealized gains onavailable-for-sale securities. Under Japanese GAAP, the assessment as to whether deferred tax assets are realizable is primarily based on estimates of future taxable income.

Additionally, differences in the carrying amount of assets and liabilities between U.S. GAAP and Japanese GAAP create temporary differences that result in differences in deferred tax assets and liabilities.

11.    Foreign currency translation

Under Japanese GAAP, the income statement items of our foreign entities are translated into yen, our presentation currency, using the respectivefiscal-year-end exchange rates, while under U.S. GAAP, they are translated into the presentation currency using the average rates of exchange for the respective fiscal years.

12.    Other

This adjustment reflects the effects of miscellaneous items.

ITEM 6.

DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES

6.A. Directors and Senior Management

Directors

The following table providesShown below are information regarding the directors of Mizuho Financial Group as of June 30, 2017:2019:

Name

AgeDirector TypeChair
of the Board
Committee Membership
NominatingCompensationAuditRisk(4)

Tatsufumi Sakai

59Executive(1)—  —  —  —  —  

Satoshi Ishii

55Executive(1)—  —  —  —  —  

Makoto Umemiya

54Executive(1)—  —  —  —  —  

Motonori Wakabayashi

54Executive(1)—  —  —  —  —  

Hiroaki Ehara

54Executive(1)—  —  —  —  —  

Yasuhiro Sato

67Non-executive(2)—  —  —  —  —  

Hisaaki Hirama

56Non-executive(2)—  —  —  MemberChair

Masahiro Kosugi

53Non-executive(2)—  —  —  Member—  

Tetsuo Seki

80Independent(3)—  MemberMemberChair—  

Tatsuo Kainaka

79Independent(3)—  ChairMemberMember—  

Hirotake Abe

74Independent(3)—  —  MemberMember—  

Masami Yamamoto

65Independent(3)—  MemberChair—  —  

Hiroko Ota

65Independent(3)ChairMember—  —  —  

Izumi Kobayashi

60Independent(3)—  Member—  —  Member

Notes:

(1)

Directors concurrently serving as executive officers.

(2)

Directors not concurrently serving as executive officers, employees or executive directors of Mizuho Financial Group or its subsidiaries.

(3)

Directors satisfying the requirements for outside directors, as defined in the Companies Act of Japan, and those for independent directors, as defined both by the Tokyo Stock Exchange and by Mizuho Financial Group.

(4)

Risk Committee consists of the two directors and an outside expert, who is not a director.

The directors’ current positions, key business experiences in the past and major concurrent offices (if any) are as follows:

Mr. Tatsufumi Sakai has been Member of the Board of Directors and the President & Group CEO (Representative Executive Officer) since June 2018. Previously, he had been President & CEO of Mizuho Securities from April 2016 to April 2018; Head of International Banking Unit from April 2014 to April 2016; and Head of Investment Banking Unit from April 2013 to April 2014. He concurrently serves as Member of the Board of Directors at each of Mizuho Bank, Mizuho Trust & Banking, and Mizuho Securities.

Mr. Satoshi Ishii has been Member of the Board of Directors and Senior Managing Executive Officer / Chief Digital Innovation Officer (CDIO), Head of IT & Systems Group (Group CIO) and Head of Operations Group (Group COO) since June 2019. Previously, he had been Head of Business Promotion of Mizuho Bank from April 2017 to April 2019; and Head of Human Resources Group (Group CHRO) from April 2015 to April 2017. He concurrently serves as Deputy President & Executive Officer of Mizuho Bank.

Mr. Makoto Umemiya has been Member of the Board of Directors and Managing Executive Officer / Head of Financial Control & Accounting Group (Group CFO) since June 2017. Previously, he had been General Manager of Financial Planning Department from April 2014 to April 2017; and General Manager of Osaka Branch of Mizuho Bank from April 2012 to April 2014. He concurrently serves as Managing Executive Officer of Mizuho Bank.

Mr. Motonori Wakabayashihas been Member of the Board of Directors and Managing Executive Officer / Head of Research & Consulting Unit and Head of Risk Management Group (Group CRO) since June 2019. Previously, he had been Head of Research & Consulting Unit or in charge of similar responsibilities from April 2016 to June 2019; In charge of business promotion of Mizuho Bank from April 2016 to April 2018; and General Manager of Industry Research Division of Mizuho Bank from April 2013 to April 2016. He concurrently serves as Managing Executive Officer of Mizuho Bank and Mizuho Trust & Banking and President & CEO of Mizuho Research Institute Ltd.

Mr. Hiroaki Eharahas been Member of the Board of Directors and Managing Executive Officer / Head of Human Resources Group (Group CHRO) since June 2019. Previously, he had been Executive Managing Director / Head of Human Resources Group and Head of Internal Audit Group of Mizuho Trust & Banking from April 2016 to April 2019; and Executive Officer, General Manager of Trust Business Department VI of Mizuho Trust & Banking from April 2015 to April 2016. He concurrently serves as Managing Executive Officer of Mizuho Bank and Mizuho Trust & Banking.

Mr. Yasuhiro Sato has been a non-executive Member of the Board of Directors and Chairman (Kaicho) since June 2018. Previously, he had been President & Group CEO from June 2011 to April 2018; and President & CEO of Mizuho Bank / the former Mizuho Corporate Bank from April 2009 to April 2014.

Note: Chairman (Kaicho) Sato engages in the company’s external activities, but does not chair the Board meetings. The Board meetings are chaired by the independent director chair Ota.

Mr. Hisaaki Hirama has been a non-executive Member of the Board of Directors since June 2019. Previously, he had been Head of Internal Audit Group of Mizuho Bank from April 2017 to April 2019; Executive Officer, General Manager of Nagoya Corporate Branch of Mizuho Bank from April 2015 to April 2017; and Executive Officer, General Manager of Marunouchi-Chuo Branch Division No.1 of Mizuho Bank from April 2014 to April 2015.

Mr. Masahiro Kosugi has been a non-executive Member of the Board of Directors since June 2019. Previously, he had been General Manager of Accounting Department from April 2016 to April 2019; and General Manager of Portfolio Management Division from April 2014 to April 2016.

Mr. Tetsuo Seki has been Member of the Board of Directors since June 2015. Previously, he had been Representative Director and Executive Vice President of Nippon Steel Corporation; and President (Representative Director) of the Shoko Chukin Bank, Ltd. He concurrently serves as Audit & Supervisory Board Member of Sapporo Holdings Limited.

Mr. Tatsuo Kainaka has been Member of the Board of Directors since June 2014. Previously, he had been Superintending Prosecutor of the Tokyo High Public Prosecutors Office and Justice of the Supreme Court. He concurrently serves as Attorney-at-law at Takusyou Sogo Law Office; President of the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation of Japan; and Corporate Auditor (External) of Oriental Land Co., Ltd.

Mr. Hirotake Abe has been Member of the Board of Directors since June 2015. Previously, he had been CEO of Tohmatsu & Co. He concurrently serves as Certified Public Accountant at Certified Public Accountant Hirotake Abe Office.

Mr. Masami Yamamoto has been Member of the Board of Directors since June 2019. Previously, he had been Representative Director, Chairman and Representative Director, President of Fujitsu, Ltd. He concurrently serves as Director, Senior Advisor of FUJITSU LIMITED and Outside Director of JFE Holdings, Inc.

Ms. Hiroko Ota has been Member of the Board of Directors since June 2014. Previously, she had been Minister of State for Economic and Fiscal Policy of the Cabinet Office. She concurrently serves as Professor of National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies; Outside Director of JXTG Holdings, Inc.; and Outside Director of Panasonic Corporation.

Ms. Izumi Kobayashi has been Member of the Board of Directors since June 2017. Previously, she had been President and Representative Director of Merrill Lynch Japan Securities Co., Ltd.; and Executive Vice President of the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency of the World Bank Group. She concurrently serves as Outside Director of ANA HOLDINGS INC.; Outside Director of MITSUI & CO., LTD.

Executive Officers

Shown below are information regarding the executive officers of Mizuho Financial Group as of June 30, 2019:

 

Name

(date of birth)

 

Current positions and

principal outside positions

Business experience

Expiration of
current term

as director

Yasuhiro Sato
(Apr. 15, 1952)

Member of the Board of Directors

President & Group CEO (Representative Executive Officer)

Member of the Board of Directors of Mizuho Bank, Ltd.

Member of the Board of Directors of Mizuho Trust & Banking Co., Ltd.

Member of the Board of Directors of Mizuho Securities Co., Ltd.

Mar. 2003

Executive Officer / Senior Corporate Officer of International Banking Unit of the former Mizuho Corporate Bank, Ltd.

June 2018
Age  

Apr. 2004Title

 

Managing Executive Officer / In chargeArea of business promotionOversight

Tatsufumi Sakai(1)

  

Mar. 2006

Executive Managing Director / Head of Corporate Banking Unit

59  

Apr. 2007

Deputy President / Chief Auditor

Apr. 2009

President & CEO (until July 2013)

June 2009

Member of the Board of Directors of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.

June 2011

Member of the Board of Directors of the former Mizuho Bank, Ltd.

President & Group CEO of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (until June 2014)

July 2013

President & CEO of Mizuho Bank, Ltd.

Apr. 2014

Member of the Board of Directors (current)

Member of the Board of Directors of Mizuho Trust & Banking Co., Ltd. (current)

Member of the Board of Directors of Mizuho Securities Co., Ltd. (current)

(2)
 

Junichi Kato

June 2014

Member of the Board of Directors, President & Group CEO of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (current)

Name

(date of birth)

Current positions and

principal outside positions

Business experience

Expiration of
current term

as director

Takanori Nishiyama

(May. 9, 1962)

Member of the Board of Directors

Managing Executive Officer

Head of Compliance Group (Group CCO)

Executive Managing Director of Mizuho Bank, Ltd.

Apr. 2012

General Manager of Branch Banking Division No.5 of the former Mizuho Bank, Ltd.

June 2018
  

Apr. 2014

Executive Officer / General Manager of Omiya Branch of Mizuho Bank, Ltd.

61  

Apr. 2015

Senior Managing Executive Officer(2)
 

Managing Executive Officer / In chargeHead of Corporate Banking

Global Markets Company

Akira Nakamura

  

Apr. 2016

Managing Executive Officer / In charge of Banking

Apr. 2017

Managing Executive Officer / Head of Compliance Group of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.

Executive Managing Director / Head of Compliance Group of Mizuho Bank, Ltd. (current)

June 2017

Member of the Board of Directors, Managing Executive Officer / Head of Compliance Group of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (current)

Koichi Iida
(Oct. 6, 1962)

Member of the Board of Directors

Managing Executive Officer

Head of Strategic Planning Group (Group CSO)

Executive Managing Director of Mizuho Bank, Ltd.

Apr. 2012

General Manager of Corporate Banking Division No.10 of the former Mizuho Corporate Bank, Ltd.

June 2018
58  Senior Managing Executive Officer 

Head of Corporate Coverage Department I of Mizuho Securities Co., Ltd. (until Apr. 2016)

& Institutional Company

Seiji Imai

  

July 2013

General Manager of Corporate Banking Division No.10 of Mizuho Bank, Ltd.

57  Senior Managing Executive OfficerHead of Global Corporate Company

Apr. 2015Masahiro Otsuka

 

57Senior Managing Executive Officer / General ManagerHead of CorporateRetail & Business Banking Division No.10Company

Satoshi Ishii(1)

 
55 Senior Managing Executive Officer 

Apr. 2016

Managing ExecutiveChief Digital Innovation Officer / (CDIO),
Head of Financial ControlIT & AccountingSystems Group of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.(Group CIO) and

Executive Managing Director / Head of Financial Control & AccountingOperations Group of Mizuho Bank, Ltd. (until Apr. 2017)(Group COO)

Name

(date of birth)

Current positions and

principal outside positions

Business experience

Expiration of
current term

as director

June 2016

Member of the Board of Directors, Managing Executive Officer / Head of Financial Control & Accounting Group of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.

Apr. 2017

Member of the Board of Directors, Managing Executive Officer / Head of Strategic Planning Group (current)

Executive Managing Director / Head of Strategic Planning Group of Mizuho Bank, Ltd. (current)

Makoto Umemiya

(Dec. 23, 1964)(1)

 

Member of the Board of Directors

54Managing Executive Officer

Head of Financial Control & Accounting Group (Group CFO)

Executive Managing Director of Mizuho Bank, Ltd.

Apr. 2012

General Manager of Osaka Branch of the former Mizuho Bank, Ltd.

June 2018

Shuji Kojima

  Apr. 2014

General Manager of Financial Planning Division of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.

54  Managing Executive Officer 

General ManagerHead of Financial Planning Division of Mizuho Bank, Ltd.

Compliance Group (Group CCO)

Motonori Wakabayashi(1)

  Apr. 201554 

Managing Executive Officer / General Manager of Financial Planning Department of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.

 

Executive Officer / General Manager of Financial Planning Department of Mizuho Bank, Ltd.

Apr. 2017

Managing Executive Officer / Head of Financial ControlResearch & Accounting Group of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.

Executive Managing Director / Head of Financial Control & Accounting Group of Mizuho Bank, Ltd. (current)

June 2017

Member of the Board of Directors, Managing Executive Officer / Head of Financial Control & Accounting Group of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (current)

Name

(date of birth)

Current positionsConsulting Unit and
principal  outside positions

Business experience

Expiration of
current term

as director

Yasuyuki Shibata

(Aug. 21, 1962)

Member of the Board of Directors

Managing Executive Officer

Head of Risk Management Group (Group CRO)

Executive Managing Director of Mizuho Bank, Ltd.

Apr. 2011

General Manager of Hong Kong Treasury Department of the former Mizuho Corporate Bank, Ltd.

June 2018

Goji Fujishiro

  July 2013

General Manager of Hong Kong Treasury Department of Mizuho Bank, Ltd.

54  Apr. 2014Managing Executive Officer 

General ManagerHead of Americas Treasury Division

Asset Management Company and
Head of Global Products Unit

Hisashi Kikuchi

  Apr. 2015

Executive Officer / General Manager of Americas Treasury Division

July 2016

Executive Officer / General Manager of Risk Management Department of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.

Executive Officer / General Manager of Risk Management Department of Mizuho Bank, Ltd.

June 2017

Member of the Board of Directors, Managing Executive Officer / Head of Risk Management Group of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (current)

Executive Managing Director / Head of Risk Management Group of Mizuho Bank, Ltd. (current)

Ryusuke Aya

(May 20, 1960)

Member of the Board of Directors

Member of the Audit Committee

Member of the Risk Committee

Member of the Board of Directors of Mizuho Bank, Ltd.

Apr. 2012

Executive Officer / General Manager of Risk Management Division of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (until Nov. 2013)

June 2018

53  Managing Executive Officer 

Executive Officer / General ManagerHead of Risk Management Division of the former Mizuho Bank, Ltd.

Strategic Planning Group (Group CSO)

Hiroaki Ehara(1)

  

Executive Officer / General Manager of Risk Management Division of the former Mizuho Corporate Bank, Ltd.

July 2013

Executive Officer / General Manager of Risk Management Division of Mizuho Bank, Ltd.

Name

(date of birth)

Current positions and
principal  outside positions

Business experience

Expiration of
current term

as director

Nov. 2013

Managing Executive Officer / Head of Risk Management Group of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.
(until June 2014)

Managing Executive Officer / Head of Risk Management Group of Mizuho Bank, Ltd.

Managing Executive Officer / In charge of Risk Management Group of Mizuho Trust & Banking Co., Ltd.

Managing Executive Officer / In charge of Risk Management Group of Mizuho Securities Co., Ltd.

Apr. 2014

Executive Managing Director / Head of Risk Management Group of Mizuho Bank, Ltd. (until June 2017)

June 2014

Member of the Board of Directors, Managing Executive Officer / Head of Risk Management Group of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.

June 2017

Member of the Board of Directors (current)

Member of the Board of Directors of Mizuho Bank, Ltd. (current)

Nobukatsu Funaki (Mar. 30, 1959)

Member of the Board of Directors

Member of the Audit Committee

Mar. 2010

Audit & Supervisory Board Member of the former Mizuho Corporate Bank, Ltd. (until June 2013)

June 2018
54  Apr. 2013Managing Executive Officer 

Audit & Supervisory Board Member (Outside Member)Head of Mizuho Securities Co., Ltd. (until June 2014)

June 2013

Audit & Supervisory Board Member of Mizuho FinancialHuman Resources Group Inc.

June 2014

Member of the Board of Directors (current)

Name

(date of birth)

Current positions and

principal outside positions

Business experience

Expiration of
current term

as director

Tetsuo Seki(1)(2)

(July 29, 1938)

Member of the Board of Directors

Member of the Nominating Committee

Member of the Compensation Committee

Member of the Audit Committee

Audit & Supervisory Board Member of Sapporo Holdings Limited

Apr. 1963

Joined Yawata Iron & Steel Co., Ltd.

June 2018

June 1993

Director of Nippon Steel Corporation

Apr. 1997

Managing Director

Apr. 2000

Representative Director and Executive Vice President

June 2003

Executive Advisor

June 2004

Senior Corporate Auditor

June 2006

Independent Director of Terumo Corporation (until Sep. 2008)

Mar. 2007

Outside Director of Sapporo Holdings Limited (until Sep. 2008)

June 2007

Outside Director of Tokyo Financial Exchange Inc. (until Sep. 2008)

Oct. 2007

Chairperson of the Japan Corporate Auditors Association (until Oct. 2008)

Outside Director of Japan Post Holdings Co., Ltd. (until Sep. 2008)

June 2008

Executive Advisor to Nippon Steel Corporation (until Sep. 2008)

Oct. 2008

President (Representative Director) of the Shoko Chukin Bank, Ltd.

June 2013

General Advisor (current)

June 2015

Member of the Board of Directors of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (current)

Mar. 2016

Audit & Supervisory Board Member of Sapporo Holdings, Limited (current)

Name

(date of birth)

Current positions and

principal outside positions

Business experience

Expiration of
current term

as director

Takashi Kawamura(1)(2)

(Dec. 19, 1939)

Member of the Board of Directors

Member of the Nominating Committee

Member of the Compensation Committee

Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Member of Nikkei, Inc.

Chairman of the Board of Directors (Outside Director) of Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings, Inc.

Apr. 1962

Joined Hitachi, Ltd.

June 2018

June 1995

Director

June 1997

Executive Managing Director

Apr. 1999

Executive Vice President and Representative Director

Apr. 2003

Director (until June 2007)

June 2003

Chairman of the Board and Representative Executive Officer, Hitachi Software Engineering Co., Ltd.

June 2005

Chairman of the Board, Hitachi Plant Engineering & Construction Co., Ltd. (until June 2009)

June 2006

Chairman of the Board, Hitachi Software Engineering Co., Ltd.
(until June 2007)

June 2007

Chairman of the Board, Hitachi Maxell, Ltd. (until June 2009)

Apr. 2009

Representative Executive Officer, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Hitachi, Ltd.

June 2009

Representative Executive Officer, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and Director

Apr. 2010

Representative Executive Officer, Chairman and Director

Apr. 2011

Chairman of the Board

Apr. 2014

Director

June 2014

Advisor (until June 2016)

Member of the Board of Directors of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (current)

June 2017

Chairman of the Board of Directors (Outside Director) of Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings, Inc. (current)

Name

(date of birth)

Current positions and

principal outside positions

Business experience

Expiration of
current term

as director

Tatsuo Kainaka(1)(2)(Jan. 2, 1940)

Member of the Board of Directors

Member of the Nominating Committee

Member of the Compensation Committee

Member of the Audit Committee

Attorney-at-law at Takusyou Sogo Law Office

President of the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation of Japan

Corporate Auditor (External) of Oriental Land Co., Ltd.

Apr. 1966

Appointed as Public Prosecutor

June 2018

Jan. 2002

Superintending Prosecutor of the Tokyo High Public Prosecutors Office

Oct. 2002

Justice of the Supreme Court

Mar. 2010

Admitted to the Tokyo Bar Association

Apr. 2010

Joined Takusyou Sogo Law Office (current)

Jan. 2011

President of the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation of Japan (current)

Nov. 2013

Member of the Board of Directors of Mizuho Bank, Ltd. (until June 2014)

June 2014

Member of the Board of Directors of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (current)

Hirotake Abe(1)(2) (Nov. 13, 1944)

Member of the Board of Directors

Member of the Compensation Committee

Member of the Audit Committee

Certified Public Accountant Hirotake Abe Office

Outside Corporate Auditor of CONEXIO Corporation

Jan. 1970

Joined Tohmatsu Awoki & Co.

June 2018

June 1985

Temporarily transferred to Deloitte & Touche New York Office (until Oct. 1992)

July 1990

Senior Partner of Tohmatsu & Co.

June 2001

CEO (until May 2007)

June 2004

Executive Member of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited (until May 2007)

June 2007

Senior Adviser to Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu (until Dec. 2009)

Jan. 2010

Established the Certified Public Accountant Hirotake Abe Office (current)

June 2010

Outside Corporate Auditor of CONEXIO Corporation (current)

Sep. 2010

Visiting Professor, Chuo Graduate School of International Accounting (until Mar. 2012)

Name

(date of birth)

Current positions and

principal outside positions

Business experience

Expiration of
current term

as director

June 2011

Outside Corporate Auditor of Honda Motor Co., Ltd. (until June 2015)

Oct. 2012

Outside Audit and Supervisory Board Member of NIPPON STEEL & SUMITOMO METAL CORPORATION (until June 2016)

June 2015

Member of the Board of Directors of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (current)

Hiroko Ota(1)(2)

(Feb. 2, 1954)

Member of the Board of Directors

Member of the Nominating Committee

Professor of National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies

Outside Director of JXTG Holdings, Inc.

Outside Director of Panasonic Corporation

Apr. 1996

Associate Professor, the Graduate School of Policy Science, Saitama University

June 2018

Oct. 1997

Associate Professor, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies

Apr. 2001

Professor, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies

Apr. 2002

Director for Economic Research, Cabinet Office

Mar. 2003

Deputy Director General for Economic Research, Cabinet Office

Apr. 2004

Director General for Economic Research, Cabinet Office

Aug. 2005

Professor, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies

Sep. 2006

Minister of State for Economic and Fiscal Policy

Aug. 2008

Professor, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies (current)

Apr. 2009

Vice-President, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies
(until Mar. 2011)

June 2014

Member of the Board of Directors of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (current)

Name

(date of birth)

Current positions and

principal outside positions

Business experience

Expiration of
current term

as director

Izumi Kobayashi(1)(2)

(Jan. 18, 1959)

Member of the Board of Directors

Member of the Nominating Committee

Member of the Risk Committee

Outside Director of ANA HOLDINGS INC.

Outside Director of Mitsui & Co., Ltd.

Member of the Board of Governors of Japan Broadcasting Corporation

Apr. 1981

Joined Mitsubishi Chemical Industries, Ltd. (currently Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation)

June 2018

June 1985

Joined Merrill Lynch Futures Japan Inc.

Dec. 2001

President and Representative Director, Merrill Lynch Japan Securities Co., Ltd. (until Nov. 2008)

July 2002

Outside Director, Osaka Securities Exchange Co., Ltd.

Nov. 2008

Executive Vice President, the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency, the World Bank Group

July 2013

Outside Director, ANA HOLDINGS INC. (current)

Nov. 2013

Outside Director, Suntory Holdings Limited (until Mar. 2017)

June 2014

Outside Director, Mitsui & Co., Ltd. (current)

July 2014

Member of the Risk Committee of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (Outside Expert)

Apr. 2015

Vice Chairperson, Japan Association of Corporate Executives (current)

June 2016

Member of the Board of Governors, Japan Broadcasting Corporation (current)

June 2017

Member of the Board of Directors of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (current)

(Group CHRO)

 

Notes:

 

(1)Mr. Seki, Mr. Kawamura, Mr. Kainaka, Mr. Abe, Ms. Ota and Ms. Kobayashi satisfy the requirements for an “outside director” under the Companies Act.

Executive officers concurrently serving as directors.

(2)Mr. Seki, Mr. Kawamura, Mr. Kainaka, Mr. Abe, Ms. Ota and Ms. Kobayashi are “independent directors” required by the Tokyo Stock Exchange, Inc.

Representative Executive Officer.

(3)The designation of the Chairman and the Deputy Chairman of the Board of Directors, and the designation of committee members and the Chairman of each committee are as follows:

ChairmanThe executive officers’ current positions, key business experiences in the past and major concurrent offices (if any) are as follows:

For information onMessrs. Tatsufumi Sakai, Satoshi Ishii, Makoto Umemiya, Motonori Wakabayashi and Hiroaki Ehara, see “—Directors.”

Mr. Junichi Kato has been Senior Managing Executive Officer / Head of Global Markets Company since April 2016. Previously, he had been in charge of similar responsibilities from April 2009 to April 2016; and President & CEO of Mizuho Bank (Switzerland), Ltd.

Mr. Akira Nakamura has been Senior Managing Executive Officer / Head of Corporate & Institutional Company since April 2018. Previously, he had been in charge of similar responsibilities from April 2016 to April 2018; and Head of Telecom Media Technology Group and in charge of Investment Banking Business of Mizuho Securities from April 2015 to April 2016. He concurrently serves as Deputy President & Executive Officer of Mizuho Bank.

Mr. Seiji Imai has been Senior Managing Executive Officer / Head of Global Corporate Company since April 2018. Previously, he had been Head of Asia & Oceania from April 2016 to April 2018; and General Manager of Seoul Branch of Mizuho Bank from April 2014 to April 2016. He concurrently serves as Deputy President & Executive Officer of Mizuho Bank.

Mr. Masahiro Otsukahas been Senior Managing Executive Officer / Head of Retail & Business Banking Company since April 2019. Previously, he had been Deputy President of Mizuho Research Institute Ltd. from May 2017 to April 2019; Deputy Head of Retail & Business Banking Company or in charge of similar responsibilities from April 2015 to Mar.2017; and General Manager of Retail Banking Coordination Division from April 2012 to April 2015.

Mr. Shuji Kojima has been Managing Executive Officer / Head of Compliance Group (Group CCO) since April 2019. Previously, he had been Head of Human Resources Group (Group CHRO) from April 2017 to April 2019; Deputy Head of Internal Audit Group or in charge of similar responsibilities from April 2016 to April 2017; and General Manager of Compliance Division from November 2013 to April 2016. He concurrently serves as Managing Executive Officer of Mizuho Bank and Mizuho Trust & Banking.

Mr. Goji Fujishiro has been Managing Executive Officer / Head of Asset Management Company since April 2019 and Head of Global Products Unit since April 2018. Previously, he had been in charge of business promotion of Mizuho Bank from April 2016 to April 2018; and General Manager of Executive Secretariat from April 2014 to April 2016. He concurrently serves as Managing Executive Officer of Mizuho Bank.

Mr. Hisashi Kikuchi has been Managing Executive Officer / Head of Strategic Planning Group (Group CSO) since April 2018. Previously, he had been Member of the Board of Directors: Hiroko Ota

Deputy ChairmanDirectors from June 2018 to June 2019; General Manager of the BoardCorporate Secretariat from April 2015 to June 2018; and General Manager of Directors: Ryusuke Aya

Nominating Committee members:

Takashi Kawamura (Chairman), Tetsuo Seki, Tatsuo Kainaka, Hiroko Ota and Izumi Kobayashi

Compensation Committee members:

Tatsuo Kainaka (Chairman), Tetsuo Seki, Takashi Kawamura and Hirotake Abe

Audit Committee members:

Tetsuo Seki (Chairman), Tatsuo Kainaka, Hirotake Abe, Ryusuke Aya and Nobukatsu Funaki

Risk Committee* members:

Ryusuke Aya (Chairman), Izumi Kobayashi and Hidetaka Kawakita (Outside Expert)

(* an advisory body)

Executive Officers

The following table provides information regarding the executive officersTokyo Corporate Banking Division of Mizuho Financial GroupBank from July 2013 to April 2015. He concurrently serves as Managing Executive Officer of June 30, 2017:Mizuho Bank.

Name

(date of birth)

Current positions and
principal outside positions

Business experience

Expiration of

current term
as executive

officer

Yasuhiro Sato

(Apr. 15, 1952)

See “—Directors.”See “—Directors.”June 2018

Toshitsugu Okabe

(May 2, 1956)

Deputy President & Executive Officer (Representative Executive Officer)

Head of Retail & Business Banking Company

Apr. 2008

Executive Officer / General Manager of Executive Secretariat of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.

June 2018

Apr. 2009

Managing Executive Officer of the former Mizuho Bank, Ltd.

Apr. 2012

Managing Executive Officer / Head of Retail Banking Unit

Managing Executive Officer (not full-time) / In charge of coordination with Retail Banking Unit of the former Mizuho Bank, Ltd. of the former Mizuho Corporate Bank, Ltd.

Apr. 2013

Deputy President & Executive Officer / Deputy President (Personal Banking Unit and Retail Banking Unit) of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.

Deputy President / Deputy President (Personal Banking Unit and Retail Banking Unit) and Head of Internal Audit Group of the former Mizuho Bank, Ltd. (until July 2013)

Deputy President & Executive Officer / Deputy President (In charge of coordination with Personal Banking Unit and Retail Banking Unit of the former Mizuho Bank, Ltd.) and Head of Internal Audit Group of the former Mizuho Corporate Bank, Ltd. (until July 2013)

June 2013

Deputy President / Deputy President (Personal Banking Unit and Retail Banking Unit) of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (until Sep. 2013)

Name

(date of birth)

Current positions and
principal outside positions

Business experience

Expiration of

current term
as executive

officer

July 2013

Deputy President / Deputy President (Personal Banking Unit and Retail Banking Unit) and Head of Internal Audit Group of Mizuho Bank, Ltd.
(until Apr. 2014)

Sep. 2013

Deputy President / Deputy President (Personal Banking Unit and Retail Banking Unit) and Head of Compliance Group of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (until Apr. 2014)

Nov. 2013

Managing Executive Officer / In charge of Compliance Group of Mizuho Trust & Banking Co., Ltd.

Managing Executive Officer /In charge of Compliance Group of Mizuho Securities Co., Ltd.

Apr. 2014

Deputy President / Deputy President (Head of Strategic Planning and Management Control (Personal Banking, Retail Banking and Corporate Banking)) of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.

June 2014

Deputy President & Executive Officer / Head of Strategic Planning and Management Control (Personal Banking, Retail Banking and Corporate Banking)

Apr. 2015

Deputy President & Executive Officer / Head of Strategic Planning and Management Control (Personal Banking, Retail Banking and Corporate Banking) and Strategic Planning (Priority Assignments)

Apr. 2016

Deputy President & Executive Officer / Head of Retail & Business Banking Company (current)

Name

(date of birth)

Current positions and
principal outside positions

Business experience

Expiration of

current term
as executive

officer

Daisaku Abe

(June 20, 1957)

Deputy President & Executive Officer

Head of IT & Systems Group (Group CIO)

Head of Operations Group (Group COO)

Deputy President & Executive Officer of Mizuho Bank, Ltd.

Apr. 2007

Executive Officer / General Manager of Executive Secretariat of the former Mizuho Corporate Bank, Ltd.

June 2018

Apr. 2009

Managing Executive Officer / Head of Strategic Planning Group, Head of IT, Systems & Operations Group and General Manager of Group Strategic Planning of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.

Apr. 2011

Managing Executive Officer / Head of Strategic Planning Group and Head of IT, Systems & Operations Group

Apr. 2012

Managing Executive Officer / Head of IT & Systems Group and Head of Operations Group

Managing Executive Officer / Head of IT & Systems Group and Head of Operations Group of the former Mizuho Bank, Ltd. (until Apr. 2013)

Managing Executive Officer / Head of IT & Systems Group and Head of Operations Group of the former Mizuho Corporate Bank, Ltd. (until Apr. 2013)

Managing Executive Officer / In charge of IT & Systems Group and Operations Group of Mizuho Trust & Banking Co., Ltd. (until Apr. 2014)

June 2012

Executive Managing Director / Head of IT & Systems Group and Head of Operations Group of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.

Apr. 2013

Deputy President / Head of IT & Systems Group and Head of Operations Group (until June 2014)

Name

(date of birth)

Current positions and
principal outside positions

Business experience

Expiration of

current term
as executive

officer

Deputy President & Executive Officer / Head of IT & Systems Group and Head of Operations Group of the former Mizuho Bank, Ltd.

Deputy President & Executive Officer / Head of IT & Systems Group and Head of Operations Group of the former Mizuho Corporate Bank, Ltd.

Managing Executive Officer / In charge of IT & Systems Group and Operations Group of Mizuho Securities Co., Ltd. (until Apr. 2014)

July 2013

Deputy President & Executive Officer / Head of IT & Systems Group and Head of Operations Group of Mizuho Bank, Ltd. (current)

June 2014

Deputy President & Executive Officer / Head of IT & Systems Group and Head of Operations Group of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (current)

Kosuke Nakamura

(Apr. 29, 1957)

Deputy President & Executive Officer

Head of Corporate & Institutional Company

Deputy President & Executive Officer of Mizuho Bank, Ltd.

Apr. 2008

Executive Officer, General Manager of Singapore Branch of the former Mizuho Corporate Bank, Ltd.

June 2018

Apr. 2011

Managing Executive Officer (until July 2013)

Apr. 2012

Managing Executive Officer of the former Mizuho Bank, Ltd.

July 2013

Managing Executive Officer of Mizuho Bank, Ltd.

Apr. 2014

Deputy President / Head of Business Promotion

Apr. 2016

Deputy President & Executive Officer / Head of Corporate & Institutional Company of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (current)

Name

(date of birth)

Current positions and
principal outside positions

Business experience

Expiration of

current term
as executive

officer

Deputy President & Executive Officer / In charge of Special Missions of Mizuho Bank, Ltd. (current)

Akira Sugano

(July 25, 1959)

Deputy President & Executive Officer

Head of Global Corporate Company

Apr. 2009

Executive Officer / General Manager of International Coordination Division of the former Mizuho Corporate Bank, Ltd.

June 2018
Apr. 2012

Managing Executive Officer / Head of Investment Banking Unit, Head of Asset Management Unit and In charge of Business Collaboration Division (Securities & Trust Services) of the former Mizuho Bank, Ltd.

Managing Executive Officer / Head of Investment Banking Unit, Head of Asset Management Unit and In charge of Business Collaboration Division (Securities & Trust Services) of the former Mizuho Corporate Bank, Ltd.

Apr. 2013

Managing Executive Officer / Head of International Banking Unit and Head of Asset Management Unit of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (until Apr. 2014)

Managing Executive Officer / Head of Asset Management Unit and In charge of coordination with International Banking Unit of the former Mizuho Corporate Bank, Ltd. of the former Mizuho Bank, Ltd.

Managing Executive Officer / Head of International Banking Unit and Head of Asset Management Unit of the former Mizuho Corporate Bank, Ltd.

Name

(date of birth)

Current positions and
principal outside positions

Business experience

Expiration of

current term
as executive

officer

July 2013

Managing Executive Officer / Head of International Banking Unit and Head of Asset Management Unit of Mizuho Bank, Ltd.

Apr. 2014

Senior Managing Executive Officer / Head of Strategic Planning and Management Control (International Banking, Investment Banking and Asset Management) of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.

Apr. 2015

Senior Managing Executive Officer / Head of Strategic Planning and Management Control (International Banking, Investment Banking, Transaction and Asset Management) and Strategic Planning (Priority Assignments)

Apr. 2016

Senior Managing Executive Officer / Head of Global Corporate Company

Apr. 2017

Deputy President & Executive Officer / Head of Global Corporate Company (current)

Junichi Kato

(July 30, 1957)

Senior Managing Executive Officer

Head of Global Markets Company

Apr. 2008

Executive Officer of Mizuho Securities Co., Ltd. / President & CEO of Mizuho Bank (Switzerland) Ltd.

June 2018

Apr. 2009

Managing Executive Officer of the former Mizuho Bank, Ltd.

Apr. 2012

Managing Executive Officer / Joint Head of Markets Unit of the former Mizuho Bank, Ltd.

Managing Executive Officer / Joint Head of Markets Unit of the former Mizuho Corporate Bank, Ltd.

July 2013

Managing Executive Officer / Joint Head of Markets Unit of Mizuho Bank, Ltd.

Name

(date of birth)

Current positions and
principal outside positions

Business experience

Expiration of

current term
as executive

officer

Apr. 2014

Managing Executive Officer / Head of Markets Unit of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.

Managing Executive Officer / Head of Markets Unit of Mizuho Bank, Ltd.

Apr. 2016

Senior Managing Executive Officer / Head of Global Markets Company of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (current)

Katsunobu Motohashi

(Nov. 11, 1957)

Senior Managing Executive Officer

Head of Asset Management Company

Senior Managing Executive Officer of Mizuho Bank, Ltd.

Apr. 2009

Executive Officer / General Manager of Treasury Department of Mizuho Trust & Banking Co., Ltd.

June 2018

Apr. 2010

Managing Executive Officer

Apr. 2012

Managing Executive Officer / Head of Pension Business Unit & Asset Management Unit (until Apr. 2014)

Apr. 2013

Managing Executive Officer / Deputy Head of Asset Management Unit of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.

Apr. 2014

Managing Executive Officer / Head of Asset Management Unit

Managing Executive Officer / Head of Asset Management Unit of Mizuho Bank, Ltd.

Apr. 2016

Senior Managing Executive Officer / Head of Asset Management Company of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (current)

Senior Managing Executive Officer / Head of Asset Management Division of Mizuho Bank, Ltd. (current)

Keiichiro Ogushi

(Aug. 20, 1960)

Senior Managing Executive Officer

Head of Research & Consulting Unit

Apr. 2011

Executive Officer / General Manager of Corporate Banking Coordination Division of the former Mizuho Corporate Bank, Ltd.

June 2018

Name

(date of birth)

Current positions and
principal outside positions

Business experience

Expiration of

current term
as executive

officer

Apr. 2012

Executive Officer / General Manager of Corporate Banking Coordination Division (Large Corporations) of the former Mizuho Bank, Ltd.

Executive Officer / General Manager of Corporate Banking Coordination Division (Large Corporations) of the former Mizuho Corporate Bank, Ltd.

Apr. 2013

Managing Executive Officer of the former Mizuho Bank, Ltd.

Managing Executive Officer of the former Mizuho Corporate Bank, Ltd.

July 2013

Managing Executive Officer of Mizuho Bank, Ltd.

Apr. 2015

Managing Executive Officer / Head of Retail Banking Unit and Head of Corporate Banking Unit of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.

Managing Executive Officer / Head of Retail Banking Unit and Head of Corporate Banking Unit of Mizuho Bank, Ltd.

Apr. 2016

Senior Managing Executive Officer / Head of Research & Consulting Unit of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (current)

Tsutomu Nomura

(May 30, 1959)

Managing Executive Officer

Head of Internal Audit Group (Group CA)

Apr. 2011

Executive Officer / General Manager of Corporate Finance Division of the former Mizuho Bank, Ltd.

June 2018

May 2011

Executive Officer / General Manager of Credit Supervision Division I and Head of Financial Service Support Department (until July 2013)

July 2012

Executive Officer / Joint General Manager of Corporate Credit Division of the former Mizuho Corporate Bank, Ltd.

Name

(date of birth)

Current positions and
principal outside positions

Business experience

Expiration of

current term
as executive

officer

July 2013

Executive Officer / General Manager of Credit Coordination Division of Mizuho Bank, Ltd.

Apr. 2014

Managing Executive Officer /Co-Head of Credit Group of Mizuho Bank, Ltd.

Apr. 2017

Managing Executive Officer / Head of Internal Audit Group of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (current)

Takanori Nishiyama

(May 9, 1962)

See “—Directors.”

See “—Directors.”

June 2018

Koichi Iida

(Oct. 6, 1962)

See “—Directors.”

See “—Directors.”

June 2018

Shuji Kojima

(Jan. 9, 1965)

Managing Executive Officer

Head of Human Resources Group (Group CHRO)

Managing Executive Officer of Mizuho Bank, Ltd.

Apr. 2013

General Manager of Commercial Finance Division for Small Corporations of the former Mizuho Bank, Ltd.

June 2018

Nov. 2013

General Manager of Compliance Division of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.

General Manager of Compliance Division of Mizuho Bank, Ltd.

Apr. 2015

Executive Officer / General Manager of Compliance Division of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.

Executive Officer / General Manager of Compliance Division of Mizuho Bank, Ltd.

Apr. 2016

Managing Executive Officer / Deputy Head of Internal Audit Group of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.

Managing Executive Officer / Head of Internal Audit Group of Mizuho Bank, Ltd.

Apr. 2017

Managing Executive Officer / Head of Human Resources Group of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (current)

Name

(date of birth)

Current positions and
principal outside positions

Business experience

Expiration of

current term
as executive

officer

Managing Executive Officer / Head of Human Resources Group of Mizuho Bank, Ltd. (current)

Shinji Taniguchi

(Feb. 3, 1964)

Managing Executive Officer

Head of Global Products Unit

Managing Executive Officer of Mizuho Bank, Ltd.

Apr. 2011

General Manager of East Asia Division of the former Mizuho Corporate Bank, Ltd.

June 2018

July 2013

General Manager of East Asia Division of Mizuho Bank, Ltd.

Apr. 2014

Executive Officer / General Manager of Investment Banking Coordination Division of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.

Executive Officer / General Manager of Investment Banking Coordination Division of Mizuho Bank, Ltd.

Apr. 2016

Executive Officer / General Manager of Global Products Coordination Department of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.

Executive Officer / General Manager of Global Products Coordination Department of Mizuho Bank, Ltd.

Apr. 2017

Managing Executive Officer / Head of Global Products Unit of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (current)

Managing Executive Officer / Head of Global Products Unit of Mizuho Bank, Ltd. (current)

Makoto Umemiya

(Dec. 23, 1964)

See “—Directors.”See “—Directors.”June 2018

Yasuyuki Shibata

(Aug. 21, 1962)

See “—Directors.”See “—Directors.”June 2018

No family relationship exists among any of the directors and executive officers.

6.B. Compensation

Mizuho Financial Group transformed from a Company with Audit & Supervisory Board into a Company with Three Committees on June 24, 2014. The following provides information before and after the transformation.

Before the transformation, in accordance with the Companies Act, as a Company with Audit & Supervisory Board, compensation for directors and audit & supervisory board members, including bonuses, retirement allowances and incentive stock options, needed to be approved at general meetings of shareholders, as the articles of incorporation did not specify otherwise. The shareholders’ approval specified the upper limit of the aggregate amount of compensation and included the description of benefits in kind. Compensation for a director or audit & supervisory board member was fixed by the Board of Directors or by consultation among audit & supervisory board members in accordance with Mizuho Financial Group’s internal regulations and practice and, in the case of retirement allowances, generally reflected the position of the director or audit & supervisory board member at the time of retirement, the length of his service as a director or audit & supervisory board member and his contribution to the company’s performance.

After the transformation, in accordance with the Companies Act, as a Company with Three Committees, compensation for each individual director and executive officer as defined in the Companies Act, including bonuses, retirement allowances, incentive stock options, performance payments and stock compensation, needs to be determined at the Compensation Committee, which is required to consist of at least three directors and the majority of which is required to consist of outside directors. See “Item 6. C. Board Practices” for more information regarding Mizuho Financial Group’s corporate governance.

The aggregate compensation paid by Mizuho Financial Group and its subsidiaries to the directors and executive officers as defined in the Companies Act of Mizuho Financial Group for the fiscal years ended March 31, 20172019 (basic salaries, stock compensation I (paid or expected to be paid at the time of retirement) and others) and March 31, 20162018 (performance payments and former stock compensation paid or determined during the following fiscal year)term in office) are shown on the following table:

 

Classification

 Number  of
Persons

(Note 2)
  Aggregate
Compensation

(Note 3)
  Aggregate Amounts of Compensation by Type (in millions of  yen)  Number of
Persons
(Note 2)
 Aggregate
Amount of
Compensation
(in millions of
yen)
(Note 3)
  Aggregate Amounts of Compensation by Type (in millions of yen) 
 For the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2017
 For the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2016
  For the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2019
 For the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2018
 
 Basic Salaries Other Performance
Payments
 Stock
Compensation
  Basic Salaries Stock
Compensation I
(paid or
expected to be
paid at the time
of retirement)
 Other Performance
Payments
 Former Stock
Compensation
(paid during the
term in office)
 
 Number
of
Persons
 Amount Number
of
Persons
 Amount Number
of
Persons
 Amount Number
of
Persons
 Amount  Number
of
Persons
 Amount Number
of
Persons
 Amount Number
of
Persons
 Amount Number
of
Persons
 Amount Number
of
Persons
 Amount 

Directors

  8   229   8   202   7   0         2   26  9  350  9  284  8  27  8  0  1  13  2  25 

Executive officers as defined in the Companies Act

  21   1,332   21   830   18   1     21   251   21   249  15  896  15  537  15  111  15  1  15  121  15  125 

 

Notes:

(1)

Fractions are rounded down.

(2)

With respect to the number of persons, the directors and executive officers as defined in the Companies Act who were actually paid or expected to be paid for the fiscal years ended March 31, 20162018 and 20172019 are stated.

(3)

With respect to the amounts, the aggregate amounts paid or expected to be paid for the fiscal years ended March 31, 20162018 and 20172019 are stated.

(4)

The aggregate compensation paid to directors who concurrently serve as executive officers as defined in the Companies Act is included in the above table as those of “Executive officers as defined in the Companies Act.”

(5)The six

An executive officer who resigned as of June 22, 2018 is included in the number of executive officers in the “Basic Salaries” and “Other” columns for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019. Five executive officers who resigned as of April 1, 20162018, and an executive officer who resigned as of June 22, 2018, are included in the above.

(6)With respect to the performance payments for thenumber of executive officers in the amounts decided by the Compensation Committeecolumn of Mizuho Financial Group in July 2016 as the performance paymentsPerformance Payments for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20162018. In addition, five executive officers who resigned as of April 1, 2018 are stated. The portions that exceed a certain amount are expected to be paid as deferred payments over three years fromincluded in the number of executive officers in the column of “Former Stock Compensation” for the fiscal year endingended March 31, 2018.

(7)(6)

With respect to the stock compensation I for the directors (excluding the outside directors) and the executive officers, the amounts obtained by multiplying the stock ownership points granted by the Compensation Committee of Mizuho Financial Group in July 20162018 based on each position, as the stock ownership points granted for the fiscal year

ended March 31, 20162019 (one (1) point translates into one (1) share of common stock of Mizuho Financial Group) by the book value of Mizuho Financial Group stock (158.6789(196.3922 per share) are stated.

(7)

The condolence money premiums subsidies concerning the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019 are included in the above table as “Other,” both of which are based on the decision by the Compensation Committee.

(8)

Because the amount of the performance payments and stock compensation II to be paid with respect to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019 has not yet been determined at present, the aggregate compensation above does not include the amount of such performance payments and stock compensation II; however, the necessary reserve is recorded for accounting purposes. The metric for such performance payments and stock compensation II for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019 was our consolidated net business profits and net gains or losses related to ETFs and others. The target amount and result of such metric were ¥700 billion and ¥408.3 billion, respectively.

(9)

With respect to the performance payments for executive officers, the amounts decided by the Compensation Committee of Mizuho Financial Group in July 2018 as the performance payments for fiscal year ended March 31, 2018 are stated.

(10)

Former stock compensation means stock compensation based on the compensation system before the revision in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019. With respect to former stock compensation for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20162018, the amounts given are obtained by multiplying the stock ownership points granted by the Compensation Committee of Mizuho Financial Group in July 2018, based on position in the case ofnon-executive directors (excluding outside directors) and position and performance in the case of executive directors as the stock ownership points granted for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018 by the book value of Mizuho Financial Group stock (¥196.3922 per share). Stock compensation for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018 is expected to be paid as deferred payments over three years from the fiscal year ending March 31, 2018.2020.

(8)(11)Because the amount of

The metric for the performance payments and former stock compensation to be paid with respect tofor the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 has not yet been determined at present, the aggregate compensation above does not include the2018 was our consolidated net business profits and others. The target amount and result of the performance paymentssuch metric were ¥640 billion and stock compensation; however, the necessary reserve is recorded for accounting purposes.

(9)The condolence money premiums and life insurance premiums subsidies concerning the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 are included in the above table as “Other”, both of which are based on the decision by the Compensation Committee.¥457.8 billion, respectively.

Listed companies in Japan are required under Cabinet Office Ordinance on Disclosure of Corporate Affairs, etc., to disclose the compensation provided to their directors, audit & supervisory board members and executive officers as defined in the Companies Act for the relevant fiscal year if the aggregate annual compensation per the director / audit & supervisory board member / executive officer as defined in the Companies Act equals or exceeds ¥100 million (including any compensation provided by major subsidiaries of such listed company as directors and audit & supervisory board members of such subsidiaries). The following table sets forthNone of our directors, audit & supervisory board members and executive officers as defined in the relevant informationCompanies Act received compensation that Mizuho Financial Group has disclosed pursuant to such regulations:equaled or exceeded the foregoing amount in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019.

       Aggregate Amounts of Compensation by Type (in millions of  yen) 
  Aggregate
Amount of
Compensation
(in millions of yen)
    For the fiscal year  ended
March 31, 2017
  For the fiscal year  ended
March 31, 2016
 

Name

(Classification)

  

Company

 Basic
Salary
  Other  Performance
Payments
  Stock
Compensation
 

Yasuhiro Sato (Executive officer as defined in the Companies Act)

  131  

Mizuho Financial Group

  70   0   23   23 
  

Mizuho Bank

  4      1   1 
  

Mizuho Trust & Banking

  2      0   0 
  

Mizuho Securities

  2      0   0 

Note:

(1)Fractions are rounded down.

Mizuho Financial Group and some of its subsidiaries, including the former Mizuho Bank and the former Mizuho Corporate Bank, abolished their respective retirement allowance programs for directors, audit & supervisory board members and officers. At the ordinary general meeting of shareholders held in June 2008, Mizuho Financial Group and such subsidiaries obtained shareholders’ approval for a payment of lump sum retirement allowances for directors and audit & supervisory board members (other than those elected after such shareholders’ meeting) at the time of their respective retirement.

In conjunction with the abolishment of the retirement allowance program, Mizuho Financial Group obtained shareholders’ approval for the introduction of stock acquisition rights for directors (excluding outside directors) at the ordinary general meeting of shareholders held on June 26, 2008. On January 30, 2009, the Board of Directors resolved to issue stock acquisition rights to directors and executive officers and subsequently allotted an aggregate of 5,409 stock acquisition rights on February 16, 2009. As the directors of Mizuho Financial Group, the directors received 435 stock acquisition rights. Each stock acquisition right represents a right to purchase 1,000 shares of the common stock at ¥1 per share of common stock. The period during which the stock acquisition rights may be exercised shall be until February 16, 2029. Their exercise is conditioned on the holder losing his or her status as director or executive officer. The book value of each stock acquisition right was ¥190,910 as of March 31, 2017.2019.

On September 3, 2009, the Board of Directors resolved to issue stock acquisition rights to directors and executive officers and subsequently allotted an aggregate of 5,835 stock acquisition rights on September 25,

2009. As the directors of Mizuho Financial Group, the directors received 500 stock acquisition rights. Each stock acquisition right represents a right to purchase 1,000 shares of the common stock at ¥1 per share of common stock. The period during which the stock acquisition rights may be exercised shall be until September 25, 2029. Their exercise is conditioned on the holder losing his or her status as director or executive officer. The book value of each stock acquisition right was ¥168,690 as of March 31, 2017.2019.

On July 30, 2010, the Board of Directors resolved to issue stock acquisition rights to directors and executive officers and subsequently allotted an aggregate of 6,808 stock acquisition rights on August 26, 2010. As the directors of Mizuho Financial Group, the directors received 500 stock acquisition rights. Each stock acquisition right represents a right to purchase 1,000 shares of the common stock at ¥1 per share of common stock. The period during which the stock acquisition rights may be exercised shall be until August 26, 2030. Their exercise is conditioned on the holder losing his or her status as director or executive officer. The book value of each stock acquisition right was ¥119,520 as of March 31, 2017.2019.

On November 18, 2011, the Board of Directors resolved to issue stock acquisition rights to directors and executive officers, and subsequently allotted an aggregate of 12,452 stock acquisition rights on December 8, 2011. As the directors of Mizuho Financial Group, the directors received 500 stock acquisition rights. Each stock acquisition right represents a right to purchase 1,000 shares of the common stock at ¥1 per share of common stock. The period during which the stock acquisition rights may be exercised shall be until December 8, 2031. Their exercise is conditioned on the holder losing his or her status as director or executive officer. The book value of each stock acquisition right was ¥91,840 as of March 31, 2017.2019.

On July 31, 2012, the Board of Directors resolved to issue stock acquisition rights to directors and executive officers, and subsequently allotted an aggregate of 11,776 stock acquisition rights on August 31, 2012. As the directors of Mizuho Financial Group, the directors received 498 stock acquisition rights. Each stock acquisition right represents a right to purchase 1,000 shares of the common stock at ¥1 per share of common stock. The period during which the stock acquisition rights may be exercised shall be until August 31, 2032. Their exercise is conditioned on the holder losing his or her status as director or executive officer. The book value of each stock acquisition right was ¥113,250 as of March 31, 2017.2019.

On January 31, 2014, the Board of Directors resolved to issue stock acquisition rights to directors and executive officers, and subsequently allotted an aggregate of 7,932 stock acquisition rights on February 17, 2014. As the directors of Mizuho Financial Group, the directors received 184 stock acquisition rights. Each stock acquisition right represents a right to purchase 1,000 shares of the common stock at ¥1 per share of common stock. The period during which the stock acquisition rights may be exercised shall be until February 17, 2034. Their exercise is conditioned on the holder losing his or her status as director or executive officer. The book value of each stock acquisition right was ¥192,610 as of March 31, 2017.2019.

On May 14, 2014, the Board of Directors determined to delegate to the President & CEO the authority to determine to issue stock acquisition rights to directors and executive officers, provided that Mizuho Financial Group would transform from a Company with Audit & Supervisory Board into a Company with Three Committees. Later, on June 24, 2014, the transformation was approved at the ordinary general meeting of shareholders.

On November 14, 2014, the President & CEO determined to issue stock acquisition rights to directors and executive officers and subsequently allotted an aggregate of 9,602 stock acquisition rights on December 1, 2014. As the directors of Mizuho Financial Group, the directors received 126 stock acquisition rights. Each stock acquisition right represents a right to purchase 1,000 shares of the common stock at ¥1 per share of common stock. The period during which the stock acquisition rights may be exercised shall be until December 1, 2034. Their exercise is conditioned on the holder losing his or her status as director or executive officer. The book value of each stock acquisition right was ¥186,990 as of March 31, 2017.2019.

Mizuho Financial Group’s Compensation Committee resolved, at the meeting held on May 15, 2015, to discontinue the incentive stock option program along with the introduction of performance payments and performance-based stock compensation for directors and officers. In addition, the Compensation Committee resolved, at the meeting held on June 14, 2018, to amend the compensation system in order to further clarify the linkage between business performance and compensation. For further information on the current compensation system, including performance payments and performance-based stock compensation, see “Mizuho Financial Group Compensation Policy” below.

“Mizuho Financial Group Compensation Policy”

Mizuho Financial Group set out the “Mizuho Financial Group Compensation Policy” concerning the determination of compensation for each individual director, executive officer and specialist officer (“Directors,Officers, etc.”) of Mizuho Financial Group as well as Mizuho Bank, Mizuho Trust & Banking and Mizuho Securities (“Three Core Subsidiaries”Companies”).

Philosophy and Objectives

Executive compensation for Mizuho Financial Group and the Three Core SubsidiariesCompanies pursuant to such policy is determined based on appropriate governance and control, and aims to function as incentive and compensation for each officerOfficer, etc., to exercise thetheir designated function to the fullest with respect to strivingin our efforts to realize management with considerationthat contributes to value creation for various stakeholders and improve corporate value through continuous and stable corporate growth based on our basic management policies under our Corporate Identity.

Basic Policy

The basic policy with respect to the determination concerning the individual compensation of Directors,Officers, etc., of Mizuho Financial Group and the Three Core SubsidiariesCompanies is set forth below:

The executive compensation shall be based on the function and responsibility assigned to and the performance of each of the Directors, etc.

The executive compensation shall give consideration to improving corporate value and creating value for various stakeholders over the medium to long term.

The executive compensation shall reflect the management environment and business performance of our group.

The executive compensation shall enable compensation for securing expert personnel such as professionals with a competitive edge in the market.

The compensation system and standards shall be reevaluated based on such factors as the economic and social conditions and survey data with respect to management compensation provided by external specialized organizations.

Regulations and guidelines, etc., concerning executive compensation, both in Japan and overseas, shall be complied with.

Compensation System

The compensation system for executive officers as defined in the Companies Act (including executive officers who are directors), executive officers as defined in our internal regulations and specialist officers, as well as directors, executive officers, and specialist officers of the Core Subsidiaries responsible for business execution (“Officers Responsible for Business Execution”) shall be separate from that for thenon-executive directors of Mizuho Financial Group and the directors of the Core Subsidiaries responsible for management supervision(“Non-Executive Officers Responsible for Management Supervision”).

The basic compensation system for Officers Responsible for Business Execution shall consist of basic salaries in the form of fixed compensation as well as variable compensation consisting of performance payments and performance-based stock compensation. The ratio of fixed compensation to variable compensation, the range

of variable compensation based on business performance and the payment method shall be designated in light of sound incentivization for sustainable growth and restraint on excessive risk taking, while our taking into account regulations and guidelines as well as research data, etc., both in Japan and overseas, concerning executive compensation. In principle, the ratio of fixed to variable compensations shall be 6 to 4 and the ratio of performance payments to performance-based stock compensation shall be 1 to 1, based on which the standard amount shall be calculated for each position. The variable compensation shall reflect each officer’s performance within the range of 0% to 150% of the standard amount for each position. The basic salaries, the performance payments and the performance-based stock compensation as well as the payment methods, etc., are in principle as set forth below:

 

 1)

The executive compensation shall be determined based on appropriate governance and control, and function as an appropriate incentive in order to realize management that contributes to value creation for various stakeholders and improve corporate value through continuous and stable corporate growth based on our basic salariesmanagement policies under our Corporate Philosophy.

2)

The executive compensation shall be based on the function and responsibility assigned to and the performance of each Officer, etc.

3)

The executive compensation shall contribute to suppressing excessive risk-taking, improving corporate value and creating value for various stakeholders not only in the short-term, but also over the medium- to long-term.

4)

The executive compensation shall reflect the management environment and business performance of our group.

5)

The executive compensation shall enable compensation for securing expert personnel such as professionals with a competitive edge in the market.

6)

The compensation system and standards shall be timely and appropriately reevaluated and set at a competitive and appropriate standard based on such factors as the economic and social conditions and survey data with respect to management compensation provided by external specialized organizations.

7)

Regulations and guidelines, etc., concerning executive compensation, both in Japan and overseas, shall be complied with.

Compensation System

Compensation for Officers, etc., shall, in principle, consist of a “Basic Salary,” “Performance Payment” and “Stock Compensation.”

1)

“Basic Salaries” shall factor in each officer’sthe function and responsibility of each Officer, etc., in addition to the standard amount for each position.position and payment will be made monthly in cash.

 

 2)The performance payments

“Performance Payments” shall be monetary made as officers’a monetary incentive for Officers, etc., to achieve the annual budget and as compensation for their achievement. The payment thereof shall reflect our group-wide results of operations, the results of organizations (ourin-house companies and units, etc.) that each officer’sOfficer, etc., is in charge of and the performance or each Officer, etc., in addition to the standard amount for each position. A system shall be adopted which, based on resolution by the Compensation Committee, etc., enables certain amount of deferred payments of the performance payments over three years, as well as a decrease or forfeiture of the deferred amount depending on performance, etc., of the company or the individual.

 

 3)The performance-based stock compensation

“Stock Compensation” shall be paid in the form of shares of common stock of Mizuho Financial Group consisting of “Stock Compensation I” and “Stock Compensation II,” (together “Stock Compensation I and II”) acquired from the stock market through a trust with an aim to align officers’the interests of Officers, etc., with those of the shareholders and increase the incentive to enhance corporate value. The payment thereof

(a)

“Stock Compensation I” shall reflectbe paid at the time of retirement of each officer’sOfficer, etc., in the form of shares of common stock of Mizuho Financial Group calculated based on each position. A system shall be adopted which enables a decrease or forfeiture of the amount by resolution of the Compensation Committee, etc., depending on performance of the company or the individual.

(b)

“Stock Compensation II” shall be paid in accordance with our group-wide results of operations, the results of organizations (ourin-house companies and units, etc.) that each Officer, etc., is in charge of and the performance of each Officer, etc., in addition to the standard amount for each position. A system shall be adopted which enables the entire amount of deferred payments of the performance-based stock compensation over three years, as well as a decrease or forfeiture of the deferred amount by resolution of the Compensation Committee, etc., depending on performance etc.

4)The variable compensation intended for professional personnel, etc., appointed from outside the group shall be individually designed based on the duties and characteristics of business responsibilities and market values, etc., of each officer, a system which enables certain amount or a portion of deferred payments andnon-monetary payments such as stock, as well as a decrease or forfeiture (clawback) of the deferred amount depending on the performance, etc., of the company and such personnel.or the individual.

TheAmong the Officers, etc., the compensation system for the directors, the executive officers as defined in the Companies Act, the executive officers as defined in our internal regulations and the specialist officers responsible for business execution (the “Officers Responsible for Business Execution”) shall be separate from the compensation system for the directors responsible for management supervision(“Non-Executive Officers Responsible for Management Supervision, in principle, shall be in the form of fixed compensation from the perspective of ensuring the effectiveness of the supervisory function and shall consist of basic salaries and stock compensations.Supervision”).

 

 1)

The basic salariescompensation system for Officers Responsible for Business Execution shall factor in each officer’s functionbe a “Basic Salary,” “Performance Payment” and responsibilities in addition to the basic amount for each of the full-time“Stock Compensation I and part-timenon-executive officers.II.”

 

 2)(a)

The stockcomposition of the compensation shall, in principle, be paid to full-time internal directors excluding outside directors50%, 17.5% and 32.5% for “Basic Salary,” “Performance Payment” and “Stock Compensation I and II” respectively.

(b)

The upper limit of “Performance Payment” and “Stock Compensation II” shall be decided* in accordance with our annual group-wide results of our operations taking into account the traits of our business activities as a Financial Services Group. The payment to each officer shall reflect the performance of each officer and the results of organizations (ourin-house companies and units, etc.) that each Officer, etc., is in charge of, and be, in principle, within the range of 0% to 150% of the standard amount based onfor each position. However,

* The amount of funds for “Performance Payment” and “Stock Compensation II” is decided for each fiscal year by multiplying the standard amount for each position in a respective year with the total number of officers in that year and a coefficient based on the result from the fiscal year’s results of operations. The evaluation metric for this coefficient is decided by setting metrics based on our Consolidated Net Business Profits, and using such evaluation metrics for the reference year and the current fiscal year (provided that, for Mizuho Securities Co., Ltd., the system is linked to Ordinary Income, which is a metric that is equivalent to Consolidated Net Business Profits based on the traits of business activities and financial structure of securities companies).

2)

The compensation forNon-Executive Officers Responsible for Management Supervision, in principle, shall be in the payment standards shall not fluctuate depending on each officer’s levelform of performance. Afixed compensation from the perspective of ensuring the effectiveness of the supervisory function. The compensation system shall consist of “Basic Salaries” and “Stock Compensation” and the composition shall, in principle, be adopted which enables the entire amount of deferred payments of the stock compensation over three years, as well as a decrease or forfeiture of the deferred amount depending on performance, etc.85% and 15% for “Basic Salaries” and “Stock Compensation,” respectively.

There are cases where compensation for some personnel, including those officers recruited locally in countries other than Japan, may be designed individually in compliance with local compensation regulations while taking into consideration local compensation practices and the responsibilities, business characteristics and market value, etc., of each respective officer. For cases where compensation is designed individually, payment of compensation is also made in accordance with the performance of the company or the individual. Payment of compensation is designed to avoid excessive risk-taking through a system which enables certain amount or a portion of deferred payments andnon-monetary payments such as stock, as well as a decrease or forfeiture of the deferred amount depending on the performance, etc., of the company or the individual.

Compensation Determination Process

The Compensation Committee shall determine the determination policy of executive compensation for Mizuho Financial Group and the Three Core SubsidiariesCompanies and the executive compensation system including the compensation system set out in “Compensation System.”System” in order to effectively secure the transparency and objectivity of compensation, etc., for individual Officers, etc. In addition, the Compensation Committee shall determine the compensation for each individual director and executive officer as defined in the Companies Act of Mizuho Financial GroupGroup; and approve at Mizuho Financial Group the compensation of each individual director of the Three Core Subsidiaries.Companies.

The President & CEO, pursuant to this policy and regulations and detailed rules, etc., shall determine the compensation for each executive officer as defined in our internal regulations and each specialist officer of Mizuho Financial GroupGroup; and approve at Mizuho Financial Group the compensation of each individual executive officer and specialist officer of the Three Core Subsidiaries, etc.Companies.

The Compensation Committee shall verify the validity of the compensation system and standards based on economic and social conditions and survey data with respect to management compensation provided by external specialized organizations.

All members of the Compensation Committee shall be appointed from among outside directors (or at leastnon-executive directors) and the chairmanChairman thereof shall be an outside director.

The Compensation Committee where necessary, may have officers who are not members of the committee (including officers of the Three Core Subsidiaries)Companies) such as the President & CEO and external experts, etc., attend its meetings and requestprovide their opinion.opinion in order to facilitate adequate and appropriate discussions and determinations.

Revision and Abolishment of the Policy

Revision and abolishment of the Policy shall be resolved by the Compensation Committee of Mizuho Financial Group.

6.C. Board Practices

Under the Companies Act, Companies with Three Committees are required to establish a nominating committee, a compensation committee and an audit committee and the majority of the respective committee members must be outside directors, as defined under the Companies Act. Such companies are also required to appoint executive officers under the Companies Act.

Mizuho Financial Group transformed into a Company with Three Committees from a Company with Audit & Supervisory Board in June 2014. The company believesWe believe that, under the current legal system, a Company with Three Committees is the most effective as a system to realize the basic policy regarding our corporate governance system for the following reasons:

 

To allow executive officers to make swift and flexible decisions on business execution delegated by the Board of Directors and to implement business execution, and to allow the Board of Directors to focus on determining matters such as basic management policies and effectively supervising management.

 

To secure to the fullest extent possible a checks and balances function that fully utilizes the viewpoints of outside parties and objectively secure appropriateness and fairness in decision-making through members of the Nominating Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Audit Committee, which consist mainly of outside directors.

 

To make possible the creation of systems that are necessary to realize the fundamental perspectives regarding our corporate governance in a form that takes into account what we aim to be and our challenges.

 

To be in line with governance systems that are required globally with a strong recognition that we operate globally and are in a position in which we should play a leading role in the industry as a financial group that is aG-SIFI to continue constructing an even stronger governance system that will agilely respond to domestic and global structural changes and overcome a highly competitive environment; and as a result, to allow us to fulfill our social role and mission, which is to realize continuous and stable corporate growth and improved corporate value and shareholder interests and contribute to domestic and global economic and industrial development and prosperity of society, in response to the demands of our stakeholders.

Pursuant to its articles of incorporation, Mizuho Financial Group has established general meetings of shareholders, individual directors, the Board of Directors, the Nominating Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Audit Committee and an independent accounting auditor as the primary components of its corporate governance system.

Board of Directors

Under the Companies Act, directors are elected by resolution of the general meetings of shareholders, and their term of office ends at the close of the ordinary general meeting of shareholders relating to the fiscal year ending within a year following their appointment.

In addition, under the Companies Act, the duties of the board of directors include making decisions on business execution and supervision of the execution of duties of directors and executive officers, and by its resolution, it may delegate making decisions on business execution (excluding certain specified matters) to the executive officers.

The main roles of the Board of Directors are making decisions on business execution such as basic management policies, which are legally matters to be determined solely by the Board of Directors, and supervising the execution of duties by directors and executive officers. In order to fulfill the roles mentioned above, the Board of Directors shall appropriately establish and supervise the operation of the internal control systems (regarding matters such as risk management, compliance and internal auditing) and risk governance systems of our group. The Board of Directors shall, in principle, delegate to the President & CEO, who is also the Group CEO, decisions on business execution (excluding matters that are legally required to be determined solely by the Board of Directors), for the purpose of realizing swift and flexible decision-making and expeditious corporate management and strengthening the supervision of directors and executive officers by the Board of Directors.

Pursuant to the articles of incorporation, Mizuho Financial Group has no more than 15 directors anddirectors. Mizuho Financial Group maintains the following structure in order to manage the Board of Directors in an effective and stable manner. In light of the role of the Board of Directors to supervise management, (i) outside directors and internal directors who do not concurrently serve as persons performing executive roles (“InternalNon-Executive Directors,” and together with outside directors,“Non-Executive “Non-Executive Directors”) comprise a majority of the directors in the Board of Directors and (ii) at least a third of the members of the Board of Directors are outside directors. Currently, the Board of Directors consists of a total of 1314 directors (six outside directors, twothree InternalNon-Executive Directors and five directors concurrently serving as executive officers).

The Chairman of the Board of Directors shall, in principle, be an outside director (or at least aNon-Executive Director) in light of the role of the Board of Directors to supervise management. Currently, Ms. Hiroko Ota serves as the Chairman of the Board of Directors.

The Board of Directors held 14 meetings in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019. In particular, the Board had discussions for formulating the new business plan. The average attendance rate was 100%.

Nominating Committee

Under the Companies Act, the nominating committee is required to consist of at least three directors, and the majority of its members is required to consist of outside directors. The duties of the nominating committee include the determination of the contents of proposals regarding the appointment and dismissal of directors to be submitted to the general meetings of shareholders.

The main roles of the Nominating Committee of Mizuho Financial Group are determining the contents of proposals regarding the appointment and dismissal of directors of Mizuho Financial Group to be submitted to the general meetings of shareholders, exercising the approval rights held by Mizuho Financial Group with respect to the appointment and dismissal of directors of each of Mizuho Bank, Mizuho Trust & Banking and Mizuho Securities (the “Core Subsidiaries”),the Three Core Companies, and exercising the approval rights held by Mizuho Financial Group with respect to the appointment and removal of representative directors and senior directors of the Three Core Subsidiaries.Companies.

The Chairman of the Nominating Committee shall be an outside director, and in principle its members shall be appointed from among outside directors (or at leastNon-Executive Directors) in order to ensure objectivity and transparency in the appointment of directors. Currently, all members of the Nominating Committee, including the Chairman, are outside directors. As of June 23, 2017,21, 2019, the members of the Nominating Committee are Mr. Takashi KawamuraTatsuo Kainaka (Chairman), Mr. Tetsuo Seki, Mr. Tatsuo Kainaka,Masami Yamamoto, Ms. Hiroko Ota and Ms. Izumi Kobayashi.

The Nominating Committee held eight meetings in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019. In particular, the Committee received reports on the status of formulation and operation of the succession plan and had discussions on director nomination and appointment for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2020 at Mizuho Financial Group and the Three Core Companies. The average attendance rate was 100%.

Compensation Committee

Under the Companies Act, the compensation committee is required to consist of at least three directors, and the majority of its members is required to consist of outside directors. The duties of the compensation committee include the determination of the compensation for each individual director and executive officer.

The main roles of the Compensation Committee of Mizuho Financial Group are determining the compensation for each individual director and executive officer of Mizuho Financial Group, exercising the approval rights held by Mizuho Financial Group regarding compensation of each individual director of the Three Core Subsidiaries,Companies, and determining the basic policies and compensation system for directors and executive officers of Mizuho Financial Group and the Three Core Subsidiaries.Companies.

The Chairman of the Compensation Committee shall be an outside director, and in principle its members shall be appointed from among the outside directors (or at leastNon-Executive Directors) in order to ensure objectivity and transparency in the compensation of directors and executive officers. Currently, all members of the Compensation Committee, including the Chairman, are outside directors. As of June 23, 2017,21, 2019, the members of the Compensation Committee are Mr. Tatsuo KainakaMasami Yamamoto (Chairman), Mr. Tetsuo Seki, Mr. Takashi KawamuraTatsuo Kainaka and Mr. Hirotake Abe.

The Compensation Committee held 11 meetings in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019. In particular, the Committee revised the compensation system so that the system would better help management to pursue shareholders’ interests. The average attendance rate was 100%.

Audit Committee

Under the Companies Act, the audit committee is required to consist of at least threeNon-Executive Directors, and the majority of its members is required to consist of outside directors. The duties of the audit committee include the audit of the execution of duties by directors and executive officers and preparation of audit reports.

The main roles of the Audit Committee of Mizuho Financial Group are auditing the execution of duties by the directors and executive officers, monitoring and inspecting the establishment and management of the internal control system of Mizuho Financial Group and its subsidiaries, monitoring and inspecting the condition of the execution of duties with respect to corporate management of subsidiaries and others by executive officers, preparing audit reports, and determining the contents of proposals regarding the appointment, dismissal andnon-reappointment of independent accounting auditors to be submitted to the general meetings of shareholders.shareholders, and adopting resolutions regarding the approval of basic internal audit plans, as well as the Internal Audit Group’s budget, commission of Group Chief Auditor, and appointment of the General Manager of the Internal Audit Group.

Given that it is necessary for the Audit Committee to gather information through internal directors who are familiar with the financial business and related regulations, share information among the Audit Committee and to have sufficient coordination with internal control departments, Mizuho Financial Group shall in principle appoint one or two InternalNon-Executive Directors as full-time members of the Audit Committee. The majority of its members including the Chairman shall be outside directors. Currently, among the five members of the Audit Committee, two members are appointed among InternalNon-Executive Directors as full-time members of the Audit Committee, and three members including the Chairman are appointed among outside directors. As of June 23, 2017,21, 2019, the members of the Audit Committee are Mr. Tetsuo Seki (Chairman), Mr. Tatsuo Kainaka, Mr. Hirotake Abe, Mr. Ryusuke AyaHisaaki Hirama and Mr. Nobukatsu Funaki.Masahiro Kosugi.

The Audit Committee held 17 meetings in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019. In particular, the Committee confirmed the effectiveness of the Structure for Ensuring Appropriate Conduct of Operations (internal control system) and provided relevant opinions. The average attendance rate was 100%.

All members of the Audit Committee shall be independent under the provisions of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and the rules of the New York Stock Exchange. Further, at least one member of the Audit Committee shall be a “financial expert” as defined under U.S. laws and regulations.

Mizuho Financial Group has established committees and other organizations on a voluntary basis in addition to the above legally-required three committees as set forth below:

 

Risk Committee

The Risk Committee shall advise the Board of Directors regarding decision-making and supervision relating to risk governance and supervision of matters such as the status of risk management.

The Risk Committee shall, in principle, comprise no less than three members who shall be Non-Executive Directors or outside experts. Currently, the Risk Committee comprises Internal Non-Executive Director, who serves as the Chairman, an outside director, and an outside expert.

The Risk Committee held six meetings in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019. In particular, the Committee had discussions on evaluation on risks surrounding the new business plan. The average attendance rate was 94%.

Human Resources Review Meeting

Mizuho Financial Group has established theThe Human Resources Review Meeting that consistsshall deliberate over plans for the appointment and dismissal of the President & CEO and outside directors who serve as members of the Nominating Committee and the

Compensation Committee as a deliberative body that mainly conducts the deliberation of proposals to appointMizuho Financial Group’s executive officers as defined in the Companies Act and plans for the appointment and removal of or commission to Mizuho Financial Group’s executive officers (as defined in the Companies Act or our internal regulations) with special titles, such plans to be decided upon by the Board of Directors. Additionally, the Human Resources Review Meeting shall deliberate over plans for the appointment and removal of or commission to the Three Core Companies’ executive officers as defined in our internal regulations with titlespecial titles, such plans to be approved by the Board of Directors.

The Human Resources Review Meeting shall comprise the members of the Nominating Committee, the members of the Compensation Committee, and the Group CEO from the perspective of ensuring transparency and fairness in the appointment of executive officers.

The Human Resources Review Meeting was held nine times in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019. In particular, the Meeting received reports on the status of formulation and operation of the succession plan and had discussions on the appointment of executive officers for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2020 at Mizuho Financial Group and executive officers as defined in our internal regulations with title ofthe Three Core Subsidiaries and assessment of executive officers.

Risk Committee

Mizuho Financial Group has established the Risk Committee that in principle fully consists ofNon-Executive Directors or external experts as an advisory body that mainly advises the Board of Directors with respect to the determination and the supervision regarding risk governance, as well as the supervision of the status of risk management.Companies. The average attendance rate was 100%.

 

Outside Director Session

Mizuho Financial Group has established theThe Outside Director Session that consists of allshall comprise only outside directors and the President & CEO as a forum for free discussionsexchange information and share understanding with an aimeach other and provide objective and candid opinions to deepenmanagement based on the outside directors’ understanding of our group and share the top management’s awareness of issues through communication among directors. At least once a year, Mizuho Financial Group holds anperspectives as outsiders.

The Outside Director Session where only outside directors attend to discuss, among others, management issues, operations of the Board of Directors and the current state of the governance structure. Forwas held twice in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, an Outside Director2019. In particular, the Session only for outside directors was held twice (in July and December) and includedhad discussions regardingon the Board of Director’s handling of authorization to pay dividends, issues of management of the Board of Directors, evaluation of the effectiveness of the Board of Directors (interim evaluation) and requested items for operating lines related to the formation of thenew business plan for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2018.plan. The average attendance rate was 100%.

Executive Officers

Under the Companies Act, Companies with Three Committees are required to appoint at least one executive officer by resolution of the board of directors, and its term of office ends at the close of the meeting of the board of directors initially convened following the close of the ordinary general meeting of shareholders relating to the fiscal year ending within a year following appointment. Executive officers shall decide on the business execution delegated by a resolution of the board of directors and implement business execution.

Executive officers of Mizuho Financial Group take charge of making decisions on business execution delegated by a resolution of the Board of Directors and implementing business execution of Mizuho Financial Group.

Mizuho Financial Group shall appoint as executive officers the Group CEO and, in principle, all heads ofIn-house Companies, Units and Groups based on the policy that it is necessary to appoint as executive officers people who make decisions on business execution delegated by the Board of Directors as managers of Mizuho Financial Group and who assume a comprehensive role of business execution.

While the President & CEO is responsible for business execution at Mizuho Financial Group, after the President & CEO makes decisions on matters delegated by the Board of Directors, determined matters shall be reported to the Board of Directors at least once every three months as part of the status of the execution of duties.

Agreements with Directors, etc.

None of the directors has service contracts with Mizuho Financial Group providing for benefits upon termination of service.

Mizuho Financial Group’s articles of incorporation, in accordance with the Companies Act, allows the company to enter into an agreement with outside directors that limits their liabilities incurred in connection with their service. The limitation of liabilities under such agreement, if the outside director performed his/her duty in

good faith without gross negligence, must be the higher of either (i) apre-determined amount not less than ¥20 million or (ii) the amount prescribed in laws and regulations, which is currently equivalent to two times the annual compensation of such outside director. Pursuant to the provisions in its articles of incorporation, Mizuho Financial Group has entered into such agreements with all of its outside directors that are in office.

Based on the rules of the Tokyo Stock Exchange, listed companies are required to have at least one member of the board of directors or one member of the audit & supervisory board to be “independent.” Further, listed companies that do not have less than two independent outside directors must disclose the reason for it. Currently, all of Mizuho Financial Group’s outside directors meet such independence requirements.

For additional information on directors and the board practices, see “Item 6.A. Directors and Senior Management—Directors” and “Item 10.B. Additional Information—Memorandum and Articles of Association” in this annual report.

The rights of holders of American Depositary Receipts, or ADRs, which evidence ADSs, including such ADR holders’ rights relating to corporate governance practices, are governed by the deposit agreement, which is included as Exhibit 2.2 to this annual report.

Corporate Governance Practices

Companies listed on the New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE, must comply with certain standards regarding corporate governance under Section 303A of the NYSE Listed Company Manual. However, NYSE-listed companies that are foreign private issuers meeting certain criteria, such as Mizuho Financial Group, are permitted to follow home country practices in lieu of certain provisions of Section 303A, and the company is relying on this exemption. See “Item 16.G. Corporate Governance” for a summary of significant ways in which corporate governance practices of Mizuho Financial Group differ from those followed by NYSE-listed U.S. companies.

6.D. Employees

As of March 31, 2015, 20162017, 2018 and 2017,2019, we had 54,784, 56,37559,179, 60,051 and 59,17959,132 employees, respectively, on a consolidated basis, including overseas local staff but excluding advisers and temporary employees. We also had an average of 20,219approximately 17,707 temporary employees during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017.2019.

The following tables show our full-time employees as of March 31, 20172019 and the average number of temporary employees for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017,2019, each broken down based on business segment and geographical location:

 

Business segment

  Number of
full-time employees
  Average number of
temporary employees
 

Retail & Business Banking Company

   23,813   12,333 

Corporate & Institutional Company

   2,116   350 

Global Corporate Company

   8,680   73 

Global Markets Company

   1,738   128 

Asset Management Company

   1,722   151 

Others

   21,110   7,184 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   59,179   20,219 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Location

  Percentage of
full-time employees
  Average percentage of
temporary employees
 

Japan

   91.2  99.8

Americas

   2.6   0.0 

Europe

   1.4   0.1 

Asia/Oceania (excluding Japan) and others

   4.8   0.1 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   100.0  100.0
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Business segment

  Number of
full-time employees
  Average number of
temporary employees
 

Retail & Business Banking Company

   24,920   11,142 

Corporate &Institutional Company

   2,238   346 

Global Corporate Company

   8,731   47 

Global Markets Company

   1,616   85 

Asset Management Company

   1,602   126 

Others

   20,025   5,961 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   59,132   17,707 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Location

  Percentage of
full-time employees
  Average percentage of
temporary employees
 

Japan

   91.0  99.7

Americas

   2.6   0.0 

Europe

   1.5   0.1 

Asia/Oceania (excluding Japan) and others

   4.9   0.2 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   100.0  100.0
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Most of our full-timenon-management employees in Japan are members of a labor union. Outside Japan, some of our employees are members of local unions. We consider our labor relations with employees to be good.

6.E. Share Ownership

The following tables show the numberShown below are two types of numbers of shares of Mizuho Financial Group’s common stock ownedheld by its directors and executive officers as of June 30, 2017:2019: One column shows the actual number of shares held; The other shows the potential number of additional shares to be held (i.e., the number of shares that are scheduled to be delivered equivalent to the stock ownership points granted by the current stock compensation system and the stock acquisition rights granted by the former stock option system).

 

Directors

Number of shares owned

Yasuhiro Sato

45,180

Takanori Nishiyama

108,500

Koichi Iida

11,520

Makoto Umemiya

18,900

Yasuyuki Shibata

24,600

Ryusuke Aya

146,380

Nobukatsu Funaki

37,000

Tetsuo Seki

21,100

Takashi Kawamura

130,000

Tatsuo Kainaka

16,200

Hirotake Abe

21,100

Hiroko Ota

5,000

Izumi Kobayashi

0

Executive Officers

Number of shares owned

Yasuhiro Sato

See above

Toshitsugu Okabe

625,500

Daisaku Abe

277,680

Kosuke Nakamura

611,300

Akira Sugano

370,100

Junichi Kato

579,700

Katsunobu Motohashi

227,840

Keiichiro Ogushi

324,270

Tsutomu Nomura

283,900

Takanori Nishiyama

See above

Koichi Iida

See above

Shuji Kojima

37,500

Shinji Taniguchi

12,400

Makoto Umemiya

See above

Yasuyuki Shibata

See above

Directors

  Actual number of
shares held
   Potential number of
additional shares to be held
 

Tatsufumi Sakai

   337,217    183,684 

Satoshi Ishii

   217,206    142,992 

Makoto Umemiya

   52,749    107,228 

Motonori Wakabayashi

   33,122    128,575 

Hiroaki Ehara

   60,435    111,350 

Yasuhiro Sato

   954,642    581,420 

Hisaaki Hirama

   130,941    78,660 

Masahiro Kosugi

   44,139    —  

Tetsuo Seki

   46,500    11,200 

Tatsuo Kainaka

   25,000    11,200 

Hirotake Abe

   46,500    11,200 

Masami Yamamoto

   —      —  

Hiroko Ota

   5,000    11,200 

Izumi Kobayashi

   11,000    11,200 

Executive Officers

  Actual number of
shares held
   Potential number of
additional shares to be held
 

Tatsufumi Sakai

   See above    See above 

Junichi Kato

   646,480    177,695 

Akira Nakamura

   224,643    145,510 

Seiji Imai

   85,218    177,533 

Masahiro Otsuka

   149,802    —  

Satoshi Ishii

   See above    See above 

Makoto Umemiya

   See above    See above 

Shuji Kojima

   98,423    117,435 

Motonori Wakabayashi

   See above    See above 

Goji Fujishiro

   52,025    117,109 

Hisashi Kikuchi

   59,073    85,938 

Hiroaki Ehara

   See above    See above 

None of the directors or executive officers is the owner of more than one percent of Mizuho Financial Group’s common stock, and no director or executive officer has voting rights with respect to our common stock that are different from any other holder of our common stock.

For information on our incentive stock options (stock acquisition rights) and performance-based stock compensation for directors and executive officers, see “Item 6.B Compensation.”

We maintain an employee stock ownership plan under which participating employees of the companies listed below isare able to contribute funds deducted from their salary and bonus payments to purchase our shares with funds deducted from such employee’s salary and bonus payments.shares. The plan administrator makes open-market purchases of our shares for the account of the plan on a monthly basis. The companies contribute matching funds equivalent to 5% of the amounts contributed.contributed by the participating employees. The following table shows the numbersnumber of shares that thisthe plan held as of March 31, 2017:2019:

 

   

As of March 31, 20172019

 

Plan

  

Employer companies

  Number of
shares owned
 

Mizuho Employee Stock Ownership Plan

  

Mizuho Financial Group

Mizuho Bank

Mizuho Trust & Banking

Mizuho Asset Management

Mizuho Research Institute
Mizuho Information & Research Institute

  
    

 

 

 

Total

     109,395,265113,885,564 
    

 

 

 

ITEM 7.

MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

7.A. Major Shareholders

Common Stock

The following table sets forth information about the ten largest holders of shares of our common stock appearing on the register of shareholders as of March 31, 2017:2019:

 

  As of March 31, 2017   As of March 31, 2019 

Name

  Number of
shares owned
   Percentage of
outstanding shares
   Number of
shares owned
   Percentage of
outstanding shares
 

The Master Trust Bank of Japan, Ltd. (trustee account)

   1,360,079,600    5.36

Japan Trustee Services Bank, Ltd. (trustee account)

   1,122,309,400    4.42   1,065,112,500    4.20 

The Master Trust Bank of Japan, Ltd. (trustee account)

   962,863,300    3.79 

Japan Trustee Services Bank, Ltd. (trustee account 5)

   525,839,800    2.07 

Japan Trustee Services Bank, Ltd. (trustee account 9)

   627,066,600    2.47    516,271,400    2.03 

Japan Trustee Services Bank, Ltd. (trustee account 5)

   492,293,200    1.94 

JP Morgan Chase Bank 385151

   393,575,328    1.55 

State Street Bank West Client – Treaty 505234

   392,747,217    1.55 

Japan Trustee Services Bank, Ltd. (trustee account 1)

   365,649,900    1.44    349,978,800    1.38 

Japan Trustee Services Bank, Ltd. (trustee account 7)

   339,733,700    1.34 

Japan Trustee Services Bank, Ltd. (trustee account 2)

   360,809,200    1.42    325,188,100    1.28 

Japan Trustee Services Bank, Ltd. (trustee account 7)

   357,374,400    1.41 

State Street Bank West Client – Treaty 505234

   353,600,880    1.39 

JP Morgan Chase Bank 385151

   307,115,823    1.21 

Japan Trustee Services Bank, Ltd. (trustee account 4)

   292,440,900    1.15    288,707,000    1.14 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   5,241,523,603    20.65   5,557,233,445    21.89
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

As of March 31, 2017,2019, there were 205214 record holders of our common stock with addresses in the United States, whose shareholdings represented approximately 10% of our outstanding common stock on that date. Because some of these shares were held by brokers or other nominees, the number of record holders with addresses in the United States might not fully reflect the number of beneficial owners in the United States.

Preferred Stock

There was no outstanding preferred stock as of March 31, 2017. We acquired 75,091,100 shares of the eleventh series class XI preferred stock on July 1, 2016, in respect of which a request for acquisition had not been made by June 30, 2016, and cancelled all of our treasury shares of eleventh series class XI preferred stock on July 13, 2016.

7.B. Related Party Transactions

We and our subsidiary banks had, and expect to have in the future, banking transactions and other transactions in the ordinary course of business with our related parties. Although, for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017,2019, such transactions included, but were not limited to, call money, loans, deposits, guarantees and foreign exchange transactions, those transactions were immaterial and were made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other persons and did not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features.

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017,2019, none of the directors or executive officers, and none of the close members of their respective families, had any transactions that are material or any transactions that are unusual in their nature or conditions, involving goods, services or tangible or intangible assets, to which we were, are or will be a party, and there were no such transactions proposed as of March 31, 2017.2019.

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017,2019, no loans were made to the directors or executive officers other than loans in the ordinary course of business, on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other persons, and involving no more than the normal risk of collectability or presenting other unfavorable features.

7.C. Interests of Experts and Counsel

Not applicable.

ITEM 8.

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

8.A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information

Financial Statements

Our consolidated financial statements are set forth in this annual report under “Item 18. Financial Statements.”

Legal Proceedings

We are involved in normal collection proceedings initiated by us and other legal proceedings in the ordinary course of our business. In addition, we are involved in the following legal proceedings.proceeding.

An Indonesian subsidiary of ours acts as collateral agent for the trustee of bond issuances made by subsidiaries of Asia Pulp & Paper Company Ltd. (“APP”). In that role, the subsidiary is involved in a dispute between the bondholders and such APP subsidiaries in their capacities as the issuers, guarantors and/or pledgors of security for the bonds relating to foreclosure proceedings on the collateral and has been named as a defendant in a lawsuit brought by the obligors under the bonds in Indonesia. Our consolidated financial statements do not include a reserve in relation to this dispute because we do not believe the resolution of this matter will have a significant impact on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations, although there can be no assurance as to the foregoing.

Dividend Policy

We have been implementing disciplined capital management by pursuing the optimal balance between strengthening of stable capital base and steady returns to shareholders.

Based on the above policy, annual cash dividends for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20172019 were ¥7.5 per share of common stock (interim cash dividends of ¥3.75 per share of common stock andyear-end cash dividends of ¥3.75 per share of common stock), which was the same amount as the annual cash dividenddividends per share of common stock of the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016.2018.

We intend to distribute dividends twice per year to shareholders of record as of March 31 and September 30 in each year asyear-end dividends and as interim dividends, respectively, to return profits to shareholders in a timely way.

In accordance with our articles of incorporation, we determine dividend payments of surplus not by a resolution at a general meeting of shareholders but by a resolution of our Board of Directors, unless otherwise provided for in laws or regulations.

We continuously consider the optimal balance between strengthening of stable capital base and steady returns to shareholders. We will comprehensively consider the business environment such as the Mizuho group’s business results, profit base, capital, and domestic and international regulation trends such as the Basel framework and determine cash dividend payments for each term.

8.B. Significant Changes

Except as discloseddescribed in note 35 to our consolidated financial statements,this annual report, no significant change in our financial position has occurred since the date of the financial statements included in this annual report.

ITEM 9.

THE OFFER AND LISTING

9.A. Listing Details

Market Price Information for Our American Depositary Shares

Our ADSs are listed on the New York Stock Exchange.

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low trading prices and average daily trading volume on the New York Stock Exchange for our ADSs:

Fiscal years ended March 31,

  Price per ADS   Average daily
trading volume
 
  High   Low   
           (shares) 

2013

   4.68    2.80    478,892 

2014

   4.55    3.62    556,105 

2015

   4.17    3.22    352,911 

2016

   4.51    2.72    608,446 

2017

   3.87    2.69    426,812 

2016:

      

First quarter

   4.51    3.53    414,585 

Second quarter

   4.50    3.41    608,347 

Third quarter

   4.27    3.72    709,587 

Fourth quarter

   4.05    2.72    702,651 

2017:

      

First quarter

   3.30    2.69    814,598 

Second quarter

   3.71    2.76    293,004 

Third quarter

   3.87    3.17    334,969 

Fourth quarter

   3.85    3.56    257,964 

Most recent six months:

      

December

   3.87    3.53    316,530 

January

   3.75    3.56    259,495 

February

   3.78    3.63    329,564 

March

   3.85    3.65    197,486 

April

   3.73    3.47    606,983 

May

   3.76    3.47    204,871 

Market Prices Information for Our Shares

See “Item 9.C. The Offer and Listing—Markets” for information on the stock exchanges on which our common stock is listed.

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low trading prices and average daily trading volume on the First Section of the Tokyo Stock Exchange for our common stock:

   Price per  share(1)   Average daily
trading volume
 

Fiscal years ended March 31,

  High   Low   
           (shares) 

2013

   221    110    142,901,584 

2014

   240    180    186,546,095 

2015

   226.6    178.1    132,018,080 

2016

   280.4    149.3    200,523,432 

2017

   225.3    142.0    162,921,802 

2016:

      

First quarter

   280.4    208.6    241,085,838 

Second quarter

   272.8    215.7    218,526,590 

Third quarter

   263.2    222.6    138,586,887 

Fourth quarter

   244.4    149.3    203,599,279 

2017:

      

First quarter

   185.7    142.6    160,817,541 

Second quarter

   186.4    142.0    160,435,263 

Third quarter

   225.3    163.5    201,903,957 

Fourth quarter

   217.3    204.0    128,571,211 

Most recent six months:

      

December

   225.3    204.1    207,247,457 

January

   217.3    204.4    139,697,321 

February

   213.9    205.4    120,643,585 

March

   215.0    204.0    126,169,232 

April

   207.3    186.7    125,785,545 

May

   210.7    192.2    97,465,930 

Note:

(1)Since July 22, 2014, Tokyo Stock Exchange has introducedsub-yen tick sizes for the shares of TOPIX 100 constituents, which contain decimals. Our shares are included in the TOPIX 100 constituents.

9.B. Plan of Distribution

Not applicable.

9.C. Markets

The principal trading market for our shares of common stock is the First Section of the Tokyo Stock Exchange. Our shares have been listed on the First Section of the Tokyo Stock Exchange, under the code “8411,” since our establishment as the holding company of the Mizuho group on March 12, 2003, as the successor to Mizuho Holdings.

Our ADSs have been listed on the New York Stock Exchange since November 8, 2006 and are quoted under the ticker symbol “MFG.”

9.B. Plan of Distribution

Not applicable.

9.C. Markets

See “Item 9.A. The Offer and Listing—Listing Details.”

9.D. Selling Shareholders

Not applicable.

9.E. Dilution

Not applicable.

9.F. Expenses of the Issue

Not applicable.

ITEM 10.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

10.A. Share Capital

Not applicable.

10.B. Memorandum and Articles of Association

Objects and Purposes in our Articles of Incorporation

Our corporate purpose, as specified in article 2 of our articles of incorporation, which is included in this annual report as Exhibit 1.1, is to engage in the following businesses as a bank holding company:

 

operation and management of bank holding companies, banks, specialized securities companies and other companies which we may own as our subsidiaries under the Banking Act, and any other business incidental thereto; and

 

any other business that a bank holding company may engage in under the Banking Act.

Our Board of Directors

Under the Companies Act (Kaisha Hou) (Act No. 86 of 2005, as amended), because we have adopted the “Company with Three Committees” system, our directors have no power to execute our business except in limited circumstances as permitted by law. If a director also serves concurrently as an executive officer, then he or she can execute our business in the capacity of executive officer. There is no provision in our articles of incorporation as to our directors’ power to vote on a proposal, arrangement or contract in which a director is materially interested. The Companies Act, however, requires such director to refrain from voting on such matters at meetings of the board of directors.

The amount of compensation to each our director is determined by the Compensation Committee, which consists of our directors, the majority of whom are outside directors (See “Item 6.C. Board Practices”).

The borrowing powers have been delegated to the executive officers by the Board of Directors in accordance with the Companies Act.

Neither the Companies Act nor our articles of incorporation set a mandatory retirement age for our directors.

There is no requirement concerning the number of shares an individual must hold to qualify as a director under the Companies Act or our articles of incorporation.

Common Stock

General

Set forth below is information concerning our shares of common stock, including brief summaries of certain provisions of our articles of incorporation, our share handling regulations and the Companies Act relating to joint stock corporations (kabushiki kaisha) and certain related legislation, all as currently in effect.

Under our articles of incorporation, we are authorized to issue 48,000,000,000 shares of common stock.

As of March 31, 2017, 25,386,307,9452019, 25,392,498,945 shares of common stock were issued.

Where relevant to the common stock, provisions of our preferred stock are also described below.

Distribution of Surplus

General

Under the Companies Act, distribution of cash or other assets by a joint stock corporation to its shareholders, including dividends, takes the form of distribution of Surplus (as defined in “—Restriction on

Distribution of Surplus”). We are permitted to make distributions of Surplus to our shareholders any number of times per fiscal year, subject to certain limitations described in “—Restriction on Distribution of Surplus.” Under the Companies Act and our articles of incorporation, distributions of Surplus are in principle permitted by a resolution of the Board of Directors as long as ournon-consolidated annual financial statements and certain documents for the latest fiscal year fairly present our assets and profit and loss, as required by an ordinance of the Ministry of Justice. Distributions of Surplus are, however, required to be authorized by a resolution of a general meeting of shareholders if the aforementioned condition is not met.

Distributions of Surplus may be made in cash or in kind in proportion to the number of shares of common stock held by each shareholder. A resolution of the Board of Directors or a general meeting of shareholders authorizing a distribution of Surplus must specify the kind and aggregate book value of the assets to be distributed, the manner of allocation of such assets to shareholders, and the effective date of the distribution. If a distribution of Surplus is to be made in kind, we may, pursuant to a resolution of the Board of Directors or (as the case may be) a general meeting of shareholders, grant the right to our shareholders to require us to make such distribution in cash instead of in kind. If no such right is granted to shareholders, the relevant distribution of Surplus must be approved by a special resolution of a general meeting of shareholders (see “—Voting Rights” with respect to a “special resolution”).

Under our articles of incorporation, the record date for annual dividends and interim dividends is March 31 and September 30, respectively, in each year. In Japan, the “ex-dividend“ex-dividend date” (the date from which purchasers of shares through Japanese stock exchanges will not be entitled to the dividends to be paid to registered shareholders as of any record date) and the record date for dividends precede the date of determination of the amount of the dividend to be paid. Theex-dividend date of the shares of common stock is generally the second business day prior to the record date. Under our articlesdate; provided, however, that, in connection with the settlement period of incorporation, we are not obligated to pay any distribution of Surplusshare at Tokyo Stock Exchange being scheduled to be made in cash which has not been received aftershortened, the lapse of five years fromex-dividend date for any dividend, the commencementrecord date of such distribution.which is on or after July 18, 2019, is expected to be changed to the first business day prior to the record date.

Restriction on Distribution of Surplus

Payment of annual dividends on shares of common stock is subject to the prior payment of annual preferred dividends on the shares of any series of preferred stock. Payment of an interim dividend on shares of our common stock is also subject to the prior payment of an interim preferred dividend ofone-half the annual preferred dividend amount on the shares of any series of preferred stock. In making a distribution of Surplus, we must set aside in our additionalpaid-in capital and/or legal reserve an amount equal toone-tenth of the amount of Surplus so distributed, until the sum of its additionalpaid-in capital and legal reserve reachesone-quarter of its stated capital.

The amount of Surplus at any given time must be calculated in accordance with the following formula:

A + B + C + D - (E + F + G)

In the above formula:

“A” = the total amount of other capital surplus and other retained earnings, each such amount being that appearing on ournon-consolidated balance sheet as of the end of the last fiscal year

“B” = (if we have disposed of our treasury stock after the end of the last fiscal year) the amount of the consideration for such treasury stock received by us less the book value thereof

“C” = (if we have reduced our stated capital after the end of the last fiscal year) the amount of such reduction less the portion thereof that has been transferred to additionalpaid-in capital or legal reserve (if any)

“D” = (if we have reduced our additionalpaid-in capital or legal reserve after the end of the last fiscal year) the amount of such reduction less the portion thereof that has been transferred to stated capital (if any)

“E” = (if we have cancelled our treasury stock after the end of the last fiscal year) the book value of such treasury stock

“F” = (if we have distributed Surplus to our shareholders after the end of the last fiscal year) the total book value of the Surplus so distributed

“G” = certain other amounts set forth in an ordinance of the Ministry of Justice, including:

 

if we have reduced Surplus and increased our stated capital, additionalpaid-in capital or legal reserve after the end of the last fiscal year, the amount of such reduction; and

 

if we have distributed Surplus to shareholders after the end of the last fiscal year, the amount set aside in our additionalpaid-in capital or legal reserve, if any, as required by ordinances of the Ministry of Justice.

The aggregate book value of Surplus distributed by us may not exceed a prescribed distributable amount (the “Distributable Amount”), as calculated on the effective date of such distribution. The Distributable Amount at any given time shall be the amount of Surplus less the aggregate of (a) the book value of our treasury stock, (b) the amount of consideration for any of our treasury stock disposed of by us after the end of the last fiscal year and (c) certain other amounts set forth in an ordinance of the Ministry of Justice, including (if the sum ofone-half of our goodwill and deferred assets exceeds the total of the stated capital, additionalpaid-in capital and legal reserve, each such amount being the amount in ournon-consolidated balance sheet as of the end of the last fiscal year) all or certain part of such exceeding amount as calculated in accordance with the ordinances of the Ministry of Justice.

If we have become at our option a company with respect to which its consolidated balance sheet should also be considered in the calculation of the Distributable Amount (renketsu haito kisei tekiyo kaisha), we shall further deduct from the amount of Surplus the excess amount, if any, of (x) the total amount of the shareholders’ equity appearing on ournon-consolidated balance sheet as of the end of the last fiscal year and certain other amounts set forth by an ordinance of the Ministry of Justice over (y) the total amount of the shareholders’ equity and certain other amounts set forth by an ordinance of the Ministry of Justice appearing on our consolidated balance sheet as of the end of the last fiscal year. We did not opt for becoming such a company with respect to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017.2019.

If we have prepared interim financial statements as described below, and if such interim financial statements have been approved by the Board of Directors or (if so required by the Companies Act) by a general meeting of shareholders, then the Distributable Amount must be adjusted to take into account the amount of profit or loss, and the amount of consideration for any of our treasury stock disposed of by us, during the period in respect of which such interim financial statements have been prepared. We may preparenon-consolidated interim financial statements consisting of a balance sheet as of any date subsequent to the end of the last fiscal year and an income statement for the period from the first day of the current fiscal year to the date of such balance sheet. Interim financial statements so prepared by us must be audited by our corporate auditors and/or outside accounting auditor, as required by an ordinance of the Ministry of Justice.

Capital and Reserves

We may reduce our additionalpaid-in capital or legal reserve generally by resolution of a general meeting of shareholders and, if so decided by the same resolution, may account for the whole or any part of the amount of such reduction as stated capital. On the other hand, we may reduce our stated capital generally by special

resolution of a general meeting of shareholders and, if so decided by the same resolution, may account for the whole or any part of the amount of such reduction as additionalpaid-in capital or legal reserve. In addition, we may reduce our Surplus and increase either (i) stated capital or (ii) additionalpaid-in capital and/or legal reserve by the same amount, in either case by resolution of a general meeting of shareholders.

Stock Splits

We may at any time split shares of common stock into a greater number of shares of common stock by determination by executive officers under the authority delegated by resolution of the Board of Directors. When a stock split is to be made, so long as our only class of outstanding stock is the common stock, we may increase the number of authorized shares in the same ratio as that of such stock split by amending our articles of incorporation, of which amendment may be effected by resolution of the Board of Directors without approval by shareholders.

Unit Share System

We have adopted the unit share system under which shareholders will have one voting right for each unit of shares consisting of 100 shares held by them at general meetings of shareholders or at meetings of holders of a particular class of shares, and shares constituting less than a full unit will carry no voting rights. See “—Preferred Stock—Voting Rights” for information on the voting rights that holders of preferred stock may have at general meetings of shareholders. Our articles of incorporation provide that the holders of shares constituting less than a full unit will not have shareholder rights, except for those specified in an ordinance of the Ministry of Justice which include rights (i) to receive dividends, (ii) to receive cash or other assets in case of a consolidation or split of shares, share exchange or share transfer, or merger or (iii) to be allotted rights to subscribe for free for new shares and stock acquisition rights when such rights are granted to shareholders. Holders of shares constituting less than a full unit may at any time request us to purchase such shares constituting less than a full unit (a) at the current market price as determined pursuant to the Companies Act in cases of such shares having a market price (such as our common stock) or (b) at the price as determined through negotiations between the holders of shares constituting less than a full unit and us in cases where such shares have no market price (such as our preferred stock), which request may not be withdrawn without our consent. In addition, holders of shares constituting less than a full unit may require us to sell them such number of shares, which, when combined with the number of shares already held by such holder, shall constitute a whole unit of shares; provided that we will be obliged to comply with such request only when we own a sufficient number of shares to accommodate such request. As prescribed in our share handling regulations, such requests shall be made through an account managing institution at which such shareholder has its account and Japan Securities Depository Center, Inc. (“JASDEC”) pursuant to the rules of JASDEC, without going through the notification procedure required for the exercise of shareholders’ rights entitled regardless of record dates as described in “—Transfer of Shares.” The executive officers under the authority delegated by the Board of Directors may reduce the number of shares constituting one unit of shares or cease to use the unit share system by amendments to the articles of incorporation without a special resolution of the general meeting of shareholders which would otherwise be required.

General Meetings of Shareholders

The ordinary general meeting of shareholders shall be held no later than three months from the last day of each business year and is normally held in June of each year. In addition, we may hold an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders whenever necessary. Notice of a general meeting of shareholders stating the place, the time and the purpose thereof must be given to each shareholder having voting rights (or, in the case of anon-resident shareholder, to its standing proxy or mailing address in Japan) at least two weeks prior to the date set for the meeting. The record date for an ordinary general meeting of shareholders is March 31 of each year.

Any shareholder holding at least 300 voting rights or 1% of the total number of voting rights for six months or longer may propose a matter to be considered at a general meeting of shareholders by submitting a request to a

representative director at least eight weeks prior to the date of such meeting. Any of the minimum percentages, time periods and number of voting rights necessary for exercising the minority shareholder rights described above may be decreased or shortened if our articles of incorporation so provide.

Voting Rights

Our shareholders have one voting right for each unit of shares held by them (regarding the voting rights held by holders of preferred stock, see “—Preferred Stock—Voting Rights”).

Except as otherwise provided by law or in our articles of incorporation, a resolution shall be adopted at a general meeting of shareholders by a majority of the voting rights held by the shareholders present at the meeting. Our articles of incorporation provide that the quorum for election of directors isone-third of the total number of voting rights. Our shareholders are not entitled to cumulative voting in the election of directors. A shareholder may exercise its voting rights in writing or through a proxy, provided that the proxy shall also be a holder of our shares having voting rights at such meeting.

The Companies Act provides that certain important matters shall be approved by a “special resolution” of a general meeting of shareholders. Under our articles of incorporation, the quorum for a special resolution isone-third of the total number of voting rights, and the approval of not less thantwo-thirds of the voting rights held by the shareholders present at the meeting is required for adopting a special resolution. Such important matters include:

 

 1.

any amendment to our articles of incorporation (except for such amendments that may be authorized by executive officers under the authority delegated by the board of directors under the Companies Act such as (i) an increase of the number of authorized shares in the same ratio as that of a stock split, (ii) a reduction of the number of shares per unit of shares and (iii) abolishing the unit share system);

 

 2.

our dissolution, merger or consolidation requiring shareholders’ approval;

 

 3.

establishment of a parent and wholly-owned subsidiary relationship by way of a share transfer (kabushiki-iten) or share exchange (kabushiki-kokan) requiring shareholders’ approval;

 

 4.

transfer of the whole or a substantial part of our business;

 

 5.

transfer of the whole or a part of our shares in any of our subsidiaries requiring shareholders’ approval;

 

 6.

taking over of the whole of the business of another company requiring shareholders’ approval;

 

 7.

our corporate split requiring shareholders’ approval;

 

 8.

consolidation of shares of common stock;

 

 9.

acquisition of shares of common stock by us from a specific shareholder other than our subsidiary;

 

 10.

distribution of Surplus in kind (except when shareholders are granted the right to require to make such distribution in cash instead of in kind);

 

 11.

issuance or transfer of new shares or existing shares held by us as treasury stock to persons other than the shareholders at a “specially favorable” price; and

 

 12.

issuance of stock acquisition rights (including those incorporated in bonds with stock acquisition rights) to persons other than the shareholders at a “specially favorable” price or under “specially favorable” conditions.

Liquidation Rights

In the event of our liquidation, the assets remaining after payment of all debts, liquidation expenses, taxes and distributions of residual assets relating to the then outstanding preferred stock will be distributed among holders of common stock in proportion to the respective numbers of shares held by them. See “—Preferred Stock—Liquidation Rights.”

Issue of Additional Shares andPre-emptive Rights

Holders of the common stock have nopre-emptive rights. Authorized but unissued shares of common stock may be issued at such times and upon such terms as executive officers under the authority delegated by the Board

of Directors determine, subject to the limitations as to the issuance of new shares of common stock at a “specially favorable” price mentioned in “—Voting Rights.”

In the case of an issuance or transfer of shares or stock acquisition rights by way of an allotment to a third party whereby the third party will hold more than 50% of the voting rights of all shareholders, we shall give notice (including a public notice) to our shareholders in advance, and if shareholders who holdone-tenth or more of the voting rights of all shareholders dissent from the third-party allotment, the approval by an ordinary resolution of a general meeting of shareholders is generally required before the payment date for such issuance or transfer pursuant to the Companies Act. In addition, pursuant to the regulations of the stock exchanges in Japan, in the case of an issuance or transfer of shares or stock acquisition rights by way of an allotment to a third party which would dilute the outstanding voting shares by 25% or more or change the controlling shareholder, in addition to a determination by the executive officers, the approval of the shareholders or an affirmative opinion from a person independent of our management is generally required.

Executive officers under the authority delegated by the Board of Directors may, however, determine that shareholders of a particular class of stock shall be given subscription rights to new shares of the same class, in which case they must be given on uniform terms to all shareholders of that class as of a record date of which not less than two weeks’ prior public notice must be given. Each of the shareholders to whom such rights are given must also be given at least two weeks’ prior notice of the date on which such rights expire (but see “—Preferred Stock—Issue of Additional Shares andPre-emptive Rights” regarding our preferred stock).

Stock Acquisition Rights

We may issue stock acquisition rights (shinkabu yoyakuken). Holders of stock acquisition rights are entitled to acquire shares from us, upon payment of the applicable exercise price, and subject to other terms and conditions thereof. We may also issue bonds with stock acquisition rights (shinkabu yoyakuken-tsuki shasai). The issuance of stock acquisition rights and bonds with stock acquisition rights may be authorized by executive officers under the authority delegated by the Board of Directors unless it is made at a “specially favorable” price or under “specially favorable” conditions, as described in “—Voting Rights” and subject to the approval of the shareholders or an affirmative opinion from an independent person in certain cases, as described in “—Issue of Additional Shares andPre-emptive Rights.”

Record Date

As mentioned above, March 31 is the record date for the payment of annual dividends and the determination of shareholders entitled to vote at the ordinary general meeting of shareholders. September 30 is the record date for the payment of interim dividends. In addition, by a determination by executive officers under the authority delegated by the Board of Directors and after giving at least two week’s prior public notice, we may at any time set a record date in order to determine the shareholders who are entitled to certain rights pertaining to our stock.

JASDEC is required to give us notice of the names and addresses of our shareholders, the numbers of shares held by them and other relevant information as of such record date promptly after we set each record date.

Acquisition by Us of Common Stock

We may acquire shares of common stock:

 

 1.

by way of purchase on any Japanese stock exchange on which the shares of our common stock are listed or by way of tender offer (in either case pursuant to a resolution of the Board of Directors as long

as ournon-consolidated annual financial statements and certain documents for the latest fiscal year fairly present our assets and profit and loss, as required by an ordinance of the Ministry of Justice);

 

 2.

from a specific shareholder other than any of our subsidiaries (pursuant to a special resolution of a general meeting of shareholders); or

 3.

from any of our subsidiaries (pursuant to a determination by executive officers under the authority delegated by the Board of Directors).

In the case of 2. above, any other shareholder may make a request to us to be included as a seller in the proposed purchase, unless the purchase price or any other consideration to be received by the relevant specific shareholder will not exceed the last trading price of the shares on the relevant stock exchange on the day immediately preceding the date on which the resolution mentioned in 2. above was adopted (or, if there is no trading in the shares on the stock exchange or if the stock exchange is not open on such day, the price at which the shares are first traded on such stock exchange thereafter).

The total amount of the purchase price of shares of common stock may not exceed the Distributable Amount, as described in “—Distribution of Surplus—Restriction on Distribution of Surplus.”

We may hold the shares of common stock acquired, and may generally transfer or cancel such shares by a determination by executive officers under the authority delegated by the Board of Directors.

Disposal of Shares of Common Stock Held by Shareholders whose Location is Unknown

We are not required to send notices to a shareholder if notices given by us to such shareholder fail to arrive for five consecutive years or more at its address registered in our register of shareholders or otherwise notified to us.

In the above case, if the relevant shareholder also fails to receive dividends on the shares continuously for five years or more at its address registered in our register of shareholders or otherwise notified to us, then we may in general dispose of such shares at their then market price and hold or deposit the proceeds of such disposition on behalf of the relevant shareholder.

Reporting of Substantial Shareholders

The Financial Instruments and Exchange Act and its related regulations require any person who has become, beneficially and solely or jointly, a holder of more than 5% of the total issued shares of capital stock of a company that is listed on any Japanese stock exchange to file a report with the Director of the relevant Local Finance Bureau of the Ministry of Finance within five business days. With certain exceptions, a similar report must also be filed in respect of any subsequent change of 1% or more in the holding or of any change in material matters set forth in any previously filed reports. For this purpose, shares issuable to such person upon conversion of convertible securities or exercise of share subscription warrants or stock acquisition rights are taken into account in determining both the number of shares held by the holder and the company’s total issued share capital. Any such report shall be filed with the Director of the relevant Local Finance Bureau of the Ministry of Finance through the Electronic Disclosure for Investors’ Network (EDINET) system.

There are other reporting requirements under the Banking Act. See “Item 4.B. Information on the Company—Business Overview—Supervision and Regulation—Japan—Examination and Reporting Applicable to Shareholders.”

Holding of Shares of Our Common Stock by Foreign Investors

There are no limitations imposed by the laws of Japan, our articles of incorporation or our other constituent documents on the rights ofnon-residents or foreign shareholders to hold or exercise voting rights on our shares of common stock or preferred stock.

Transfer of Shares

At present, JASDEC is the only institution that is designated by the relevant authorities as a clearing house which is permitted to engage in the clearing operations of listed shares under the Act on Book-Entry Transfer of

Corporate Bonds, Stocks, etc. (Act No. 75 of 2001, including regulations promulgated thereunder; the “Book-entry Act”). Under the clearing system above, in order for any person to hold, sell or otherwise dispose of listed shares, such person must have an account at an account managing institution unless such person has an account at JASDEC. “Account managing institutions” are financial instruments business operators (i.e., securities companies), banks, trust companies and certain other financial institutions which meet the requirements prescribed by the Book-entry Act, and only those financial institutions that meet further stringent requirements of the Book-entry Act can open accounts directly at JASDEC. Under the Book-entry Act, any transfer of shares is effected through book entry, and title to the shares passes to the transferee at the time when the transferred number of the shares is recorded at the transferee’s account at an account managing institution. The holder of an account at an account managing institution is presumed to be the legal owner of the shares held in such account. Under the Companies Act and the Book-entry Act, in order to assert shareholders’ rights to which shareholders as of record dates are entitled (such as the rights to vote at a general meeting of shareholders or receive dividends) against us, a shareholder must have its name and address registered in our register of shareholders. Under the clearing system, such registration is made upon our receipt of necessary information from JASDEC. On the other hand, in order to assert shareholders’ rights to which shareholders are entitled regardless of record dates such as minority shareholders’ rights including the right to propose a matter to be considered at a general meeting of shareholders, except for shareholders’ rights to request us to purchase or sell shares constituting less than a full unit (as described in “—Unit Share System”), upon the shareholder’s request, JASDEC shall issue a notice of certain information, including the name and address of such shareholder, to us. Thereafter, such shareholder is required to present us a receipt of the request of the notice in accordance with our share handling regulations. Under the Book-entry Act, the shareholder shall exercise such shareholders’ right within four weeks after the notice above.Non-resident shareholders are required to appoint a standing proxy in Japan or provide a mailing address in Japan. Each such shareholder must give notice of such standing proxy or mailing address to the relevant account managing institution. Such notice will be forwarded to us through JASDEC. Japanese securities companies and commercial banks customarily act as standing proxies and provide related services for standard fees. Notices from us tonon-resident shareholders are delivered to such standing proxies or mailing addresses.

Under the clearing system, shares constituting less than one unit are transferable. Under the rules of the Japanese stock exchanges, however, shares constituting less than one unit do not comprise a trading unit, except in limited circumstances, and accordingly may not be sold on Japanese stock exchanges.

Our transfer agent is Mizuho Trust & Banking, located at2-1, Yaesu1-chome, Chuo-ku, Tokyo103-8670, Japan.

The registered holder of deposited shares underlying the ADSs is the depositary for the ADSs. Accordingly, holders of ADSs will not be able to directly assert their shareholders’ rights against us.

Preferred Stock

The following is a summary of information concerning the shares of our preferred stock, including brief summaries of the relevant provisions of our articles of incorporation, our share handling regulations and the Companies Act and certain related legislation, all as currently in effect. The detailed rights of our preferred stock are set forth in our articles of incorporation and the resolutions of our Board of Directors or a determination by executive officer(s) under the authority delegated by the Board of Directors relating to the issuance of the relevant series of preferred stock.

General

Under our articles of incorporation, we are authorized to issue 900,000,000 shares of each of the first to fourth series of class XIV preferred stock (provided that the aggregate number of shares authorized to be issued with respect to the four series of class XIV preferred stock may not exceed 900,000,000 shares), 900,000,000

shares of each of the first to fourth series of class XV preferred stock (provided that the aggregate number of shares authorized to be issued with respect to the four series of class XV preferred stock may not exceed 900,000,000 shares), 1,500,000,000 shares of each of the first to fourth series of class XVI preferred stock (provided that the aggregate number of shares authorized to be issued with respect to the four series of class XVI preferred stock may not exceed 1,500,000,000 shares).

As of March 31, 2017,2019, there was no outstanding preferred stock. On July 1, 2016, 75,091,100 shares of eleventh series class XI preferred stock, which were then all the outstanding shares of such series (excluding our treasury shares), were mandatorily acquired by us in consideration of 265,433,368 shares of common stock, which number of shares was calculated at ¥282.90 per share, and all of our treasury shares of eleventh series class XI preferred stock were cancelled on July 13, 2016.

Preferred Dividends

Payment of annual dividends on shares of common stock is subject to the prior payment of the annual preferred dividends on shares of preferred stock. The amount of preferred dividends for each series of the preferred stock is as follows:

 

Each of the first to fourth series of class XIV preferred stock (currently not in issue) bears an annualnon-cumulative dividend of the amount to be determined by resolution of the Board of Directors or determination by executive officer(s) under the authority delegated by the Board of Directors at the time of issuance, up to a maximum of ¥100 per share, and in the event we pay an interim dividend, holders are entitled to receive one half of such amount per share in preference to common stock.

 

Each of the first to fourth series of class XV preferred stock (currently not in issue) bears an annualnon-cumulative dividend of the amount to be determined by resolution of the Board of Directors or determination by executive officer(s) under the authority delegated by the Board of Directors at the time of issuance, up to a maximum of ¥100 per share, and in the event we pay an interim dividend, holders are entitled to receive one half of such amount per share in preference to common stock.

 

Each of the first to fourth series of class XVI preferred stock (currently not in issue) bears an annualnon-cumulative dividend of the amount to be determined by resolution of the Board of Directors or determination by executive officer(s) under the authority delegated by the Board of Directors at the time of issuance, up to a maximum of ¥100 per share, and in the event we pay an interim dividend, holders are entitled to receive one half of such amount per share in preference to common stock.

The amount of any interim preferred dividend will be deducted from the annual preferred dividend payable on preferred stock in respect of the same fiscal year.

No payment of dividends on our preferred stock or any other stock may be made unless we have sufficient Distributable Amount and a resolution to pay such dividend is obtained at the Board of Directors or at the relevant general meeting of shareholders, as the case may be.

Dividends on our preferred stock arenon-cumulative. If the full amount of any dividend is not declared on our preferred stock in respect of any fiscal year, holders of our preferred stock do not have any right to receive dividends in respect of the deficiency in any subsequent fiscal year, and we will have no obligation to pay the deficiency or to pay any interest regardless of whether or not dividends are paid in respect of any subsequent fiscal year. The holders of our preferred stock are not entitled to any further dividends or other participation in or distribution of surplus.

Liquidation Rights

In the event of our voluntary or involuntary liquidation, holders of our preferred stock will be entitled, equally in rank as among themselves and in preference over shares of common stock, to receive a distribution of ¥1,000 per share out of our residual assets upon our liquidation.

Holders of our preferred stock are not entitled to any further dividends or other participation in or distribution of our residual assets upon our liquidation.

Voting Rights

No holder of preferred stock has a right to receive notice of, or to vote at, a general meeting of shareholders, except as otherwise specifically provided under the Companies Act or other applicable law or our articles of incorporation. Under our articles of incorporation, holders of units of our preferred stock will be entitled to receive notice of, and to vote at, general meetings of shareholders:

 

from the commencement of any ordinary general meeting of shareholders if an agenda for approval to declare a preferred dividend is not submitted to such meeting (except in the case where a resolution of the Board of Directors to pay the preferred dividends is made pursuant to our articles of incorporation between the last day of the business year and the date of such meeting); or

 

from the close of any ordinary general meeting of shareholders if a proposed resolution to declare a preferred dividend is not approved at such meeting,

until such time as a resolution of the Board of Directors to pay the preferred dividends is made pursuant to our articles of incorporation or a resolution of an ordinary general meeting of shareholders declaring a preferred dividend is approved.

A separate resolution of a meeting of the holders of the preferred stock is required in order to approve the following matters which would prejudice the interests of the holders of the relevant preferred stock:

 

 (i)

an amendment to the articles of incorporation to add new classes of shares to be issued, alter the terms of the shares or increase the number of authorized number of shares or authorized number of any class of shares, with certain exceptions;

 

 (ii)

consolidation or split of shares;

 

 (iii)

pro rated allocation of shares or stock acquisition rights to shareholders without any consideration;

 

 (iv)

grantingpre-emptive rights for new shares or stock acquisition rights to shareholders;

 

 (v)

amalgamations or mergers;

 

 (vi)

certain corporate splits;

 

 (vii)

share exchanges;

 

 (viii)

share transfers; and

 

 (ix)

other matters set forth in the articles of incorporation.

Such separate resolution is not required when the articles of incorporation so provide, except in the case of (i) above.

A separate resolution of a meeting of the holders of the common stock is also required in cases where the above matters would prejudice the interests of the holders of the common stock.

Under our articles of incorporation, in cases where a matter to be resolved at an ordinary general meeting of shareholders is required to be approved by such separate resolution, the record date for the relevant meeting of

the holders of the common stock or the preferred stock, as the case may be, is the same date as the record date for the ordinary general meeting of shareholders, when is March 31 of each year.

Ranking

We will not (unless the requisite sanction has been given by holders of preferred stock) create or issue any other shares ranking, as regards order of participation in the profits or assets of us on a liquidation or otherwise, in priority to the preferred stock in issue, but we may issue, without obtaining the consent of holders of the

preferred stock in issue, other preferred stock ranking pari passu with the preferred stock in issue as regards the order of such participation in profits or assets of us and carrying such rights as to rates of preferred dividends or terms of conversion as the Board of Directors may determine, subject to the limitations set forth in our articles of incorporation and the Companies Act.

Acquisition of Preferred Stock

We may, if required, subject to regulatory approval, acquire any shares of the preferred stock then outstanding at any time out of the Distributable Amount (as defined in “—Common Stock—Restriction on Distribution of Surplus”). On or after the date to be determined by a resolution of the Board of Directors or a determination by executive officer(s) under the authority delegated by the Board of Directors relating to the issuance of the relevant preferred stock, we may also acquire all or a portion of each series of the first to fourth series of class XV (currently not in issue) or the first to fourth series of class XVI preferred stock (currently not in issue) at the acquisition price to be determined by a resolution of the Board of Directors or a determination by executive officer(s) under the authority delegated by the Board of Directors relating to the issuance of the relevant preferred stock on the date separately determined by a resolution of the Board of Directors or a determination by executive officer(s) under the authority delegated by the Board of Directors, without consent of the holders of such preferred stock. When a portion of a certain class of preferred stock is acquired, such acquisition shall be made from each holder thereof in number of shares determined by way of a lot or pro rata allocation.

Stock Splits

Our articles of incorporation provide that no stock split, stock consolidation or free distribution of stock shall be made in respect of the preferred stock unless otherwise provided for in any law or regulation.

Issue of Additional Shares andPre-emptive Rights

Our articles of incorporation provide that no holder of our preferred stock has anypre-emptive right to subscribe for or purchase shares, stock acquisition rights or bonds with stock acquisition rights in the event of an issuance of additional shares or bonds and that no free distribution of stock acquisition rights may be made to the holders of our preferred stock.

Conversion

Our articles of incorporation provide that holders of the first to fourth series of class XIV (currently not in issue) or the first to fourth series of class XV (currently not in issue) preferred stock may, at their option, convert their shares to common stock by requesting us to acquire such shares and issue or transfer common stock to them. Other classes of our preferred stock arenon-convertible.

Our articles of incorporation also provide that the first to fourth series of class XIV (currently not in issue) or the first to fourth series of class XV (currently not in issue) preferred stock outstanding on the last day of the acquisition period will be mandatorily acquired by us on the immediately following day (the “mandatory conversion date”) in consideration of shares of common stock of which number shall be calculated at the then-current market price per share of our common stock (the “mandatory conversion price”).

On July 1, 2016, which was the mandatory conversion date, 75,091,100 shares of eleventh series class XI preferred stock, which were then all the outstanding shares of such series (excluding our treasury shares), were mandatorily acquired by us in consideration of 265,433,368 shares of common stock. Such number of shares was calculated at ¥282.90 per share as the mandatory conversion price which was the average price of daily closing prices of our common stock on the Tokyo Stock Exchange for the 30 consecutive trading days commencing on the 45th trading day prior to the mandatory conversion date.

Acquisition of Preferred Stock without Consideration or in Exchange for Common Stock

In order to enable the relevant preferred stock to meet the criteria for inclusion in Additional Tier 1 capital under the capital adequacy guidelines of the Financial Services Agency under the Basel III rules, the first to fourth series of class XIV (currently not in issue), the first to fourth series of class XV (currently not in issue) and the first to fourth series of class XVI (currently not in issue) preferred stock have the following feature.

In respect of the first and second series of class XIV (currently not in issue), the first and second series of class XV (currently not in issue) and the first and second series of class XVI (currently not in issue) preferred stock, upon the occurrence of an event determined by a resolution of the Board of Directors or a determination by executive officer(s) under the authority delegated by the Board of Directors relating to the issuance of the relevant preferred stock as an event where awrite-off of the relevant preferred stock or a conversion of the relevant preferred stock into common stock, or financial support or other similar measures taken by a public sector, without which we would becomenon-viable, is determined to be necessary, we shall mandatorily acquire the relevant preferred stock, in whole, free of consideration, on a date which falls after the occurrence of such event as determined by the resolution of the Board of Directors or a determination by executive officer(s) under the authority delegated by the Board of Directors relating to the issuance of the relevant preferred stock and which date shall be separately determined by a resolution of the Board of Directors or a determination by executive officer(s) under the authority delegated by the Board of Directors after the issuance of the relevant preferred stock, or a date which falls after the occurrence of the relevant certain event and which date shall be determined by the resolution of the Board of Directors or a determination by executive officer(s) under the authority delegated by the Board of Directors relating to the issuance of the relevant preferred stock, giving due consideration to the capital adequacy requirements applicable to us and other factors.

In respect of the third and fourth series of class XIV (currently not in issue), the third and fourth series of class XV (currently not in issue) and the third and fourth series of class XVI (currently not in issue) preferred stock, upon the occurrence of an event determined by a resolution of the Board of Directors or a determination by executive officer(s) under the authority delegated by the Board of Directors relating to the issuance of the relevant preferred stock as an event where awrite-off of the relevant preferred stock or a conversion of the relevant preferred stock into common stock, or financial support or other similar measures taken by a public sector, without which we would becomenon-viable, is determined to be necessary, we shall mandatorily acquire the relevant preferred stock, in whole, on a date which falls after the occurrence of such event as determined by the resolution of the Board of Directors or a determination by executive officer(s) under the authority delegated by the Board of Directors relating to the issuance of the relevant preferred stock and which date shall be separately determined by a resolution of the Board of Directors or a determination by executive officer(s) under the authority delegated by the Board of Directors after the issuance of the relevant preferred stock, or a date which falls after the occurrence of the relevant certain event and which date shall be determined by the resolution of the Board of Directors or a determination by executive officer(s) under the authority delegated by the Board of Directors relating to the issuance of the relevant preferred stock, giving due consideration to the capital adequacy requirements applicable to us and other factors, and instead, we shall deliver our own common stock to holders of the relevant preferred stock. In this case, the terms of acquisition, including the number of shares of the common stock to be delivered in exchange for the acquisition of one (1) share of the relevant preferred stock, shall be determined by the resolution of the relevant Board of Directors or the determination by relevant executive officer(s) under the authority delegated by the Board of Directors relating to the issuance of the relevant preferred stock, giving due consideration to the market price of common stock, the subscription price of the relevant preferred stock and other factors.

10.C. Material Contracts

There were no material contracts entered into by us for the two years preceding the filing of this annual report that were not entered into in the ordinary course of business.

10.D. Exchange Controls

Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade Act

The Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade Act of Japan and the cabinet orders and ministerial ordinances incidental thereto, collectively the Foreign Exchange Act, set forth, among other matters, the regulations relating to the receipt bynon-residents of Japan of payment with respect to shares to be issued by us and the acquisition and holding of shares bynon-residents of Japan and foreign investors, both as defined below. It also applies in

some cases to the acquisition and holding of ADSs representing such shares acquired and held bynon-residents of Japan and by foreign investors. Generally, the Foreign Exchange Act currently in effect does not affect the right of anon-resident of Japan to purchase or sell ADSs outside Japan fornon-Japanese currency.

“Non-residents of Japan” are defined as individuals who are not resident in Japan and corporations whose principal offices are located outside Japan. Generally, the branches and offices ofnon-resident corporations that are located in Japan are regarded as residents of Japan while the branches and offices of Japanese corporations located outside Japan are regarded asnon-residents of Japan.

“Foreign investors” are defined as:the following persons who make certain prescribed investments:

 

individuals not resident in Japan;

 

judicial persons or other organizations that are organized under the laws of foreign countries or whose principal offices are located outside Japan;

 

corporations of which 50% or more of the shares are held by individuals not resident in Japan and/or judicial persons or other organizations that are organized under the laws of foreign countries or whose principal offices are located outside Japan; and

 

judicial persons or other organizations, a majority of officers (or a majority of officers having the power of representation) of which are not resident in Japan.

Dividends and Proceeds of Sales

Under the Foreign Exchange Act, dividends paid on, and the proceeds of sales in Japan of, shares held bynon-residents of Japan may in general be converted into any foreign currency and repatriated abroad. The acquisition of our shares bynon-residents of Japan by way of a stock split is not subject to any notification or reporting requirements.

Acquisition of Shares

In general, anon-resident of Japan who acquires shares from a resident of Japan is not subject to any prior filing requirement, although the Foreign Exchange Act empowers the Minister of Finance of Japan to require prior approval for any such acquisition in certain limited circumstances. While such prior approval is not required in general, in the case where a resident of Japan transfers shares of a Japanese company for consideration exceeding \100 million to anon-resident of Japan, the resident of Japan that transfers the shares is required to report the transfer to the Minister of Finance of Japan within 20 days from the date of the transfer or the date of the payment for such transfer, whichever is later, unless the transfer is made through a bank or financial instruments business operator licensed or registered under Japanese law.

If a foreign investor acquires our shares and, together with parties who have a special relationship with that foreign investor, holds 10% or more of our issued shares as a result of such acquisition, the foreign investor must file a report of such acquisition with the Minister of Finance and any other competent Minister on or before the 15th day of the month following the month in which the acquisition was made, in principle. In certain limited circumstances, however, a prior notification of such acquisition must be filed with the Minister of Finance and any other competent Minister, who may modify or prohibit the proposed acquisition. If a foreign investor required to file such prior notification acquires our shares without compliance with such notification requirements or the order of modification of or prohibition on the proposed acquisition, the Minister of Finance and any other competent minister may order the foreign investor to dispose of all or part of the shares or take other necessary measures.

Deposit and Withdrawal under American Depositary Facility

The deposit of shares with Mizuho Bank, in its capacity as custodian and agent for the depositary, in Tokyo, the issuance of ADSs by the depositary to anon-resident of Japan in respect of the deposit and the withdrawal of

the underlying shares upon the surrender of the ADR are not subject to any of the formalities or restrictions referred to above. However, where as a result of a deposit or withdrawal the aggregate number of shares held by the depositary, including shares deposited with Mizuho Bank as custodian for the depositary, or the holder surrendering the ADR, as the case may be, would be 10% or more of the total outstanding shares, a report will be required, and in specified circumstances, a prior notification may be required, as noted above.

10.E. Taxation

Japanese Taxation

The following is a general summary of major Japanese tax consequences (limited to national tax) to holders of shares of our common stock or ADSs representing shares of our common stock who arenon-residents of Japan ornon-Japanese corporations without a permanent establishment in Japan, which we refer to as“non-resident holders” in this section. The statements regarding Japanese tax laws set forth below are based on the laws and treaties in force and as interpreted by the Japanese tax authorities as at the date of this Annual Report and are subject to changes in the applicable Japanese laws or tax treaties, conventions or agreements, or interpretations thereof, occurring after that date. This summary is not exhaustive of all possible tax considerations that may apply to a particular investor, and potential investors are advised to satisfy themselves as to the overall tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of shares of our common stock or ADSs, including specifically the tax consequences under Japanese law, the laws of the jurisdiction of which they are resident, and any tax treaty, convention or agreement between Japan and their country of residence, by consulting their own tax advisers.

For the purpose of Japanese tax law and the tax treaty between the United States and Japan, a U.S. holder of ADSs will generally be treated as the owner of the shares underlying the ADSs evidenced by the ADRs.

Generally, anon-resident holder of shares of our common stock or ADSs is subject to Japanese income tax collected by way of withholding on dividends paid by us, and such tax will be withheld prior to payment of dividends. Stock splits are, in general, not a taxable event.

In the absence of any applicable tax treaty, convention or agreement reducing the maximum rate of Japanese withholding tax or allowing exemption from Japanese withholding tax, the rate of Japanese withholding tax applicable to dividends paid by Japanese corporations on their shares of stock tonon-resident holders is generally 20.42% under Japanese tax law. However, with respect to dividends paid on listed shares issued by a Japanese corporation (such as shares of our common stock or ADSs) tonon-resident holders, other than any individual shareholder who holds 3% or more of the total number of shares issued by the relevant Japanese corporation, the aforementioned 20.42% withholding tax rate is reduced to 15.315% for dividends due and payable on or before December 31, 2037. Due to the imposition of a special additional withholding tax (2.1% of the original withholding tax amount) to secure funds for reconstruction from the Great East Japan Earthquake, the original withholding tax rate of 15% and 20%, as applicable, has been effectively increased, respectively, to 15.315% and 20.42%, during the period beginning on January 1, 2013 and ending on December 31, 2037.

Under the income tax treaty between the United States and Japan, the maximum rate of Japanese withholding tax which may be imposed on dividends paid to a qualified United States resident eligible to enjoy treaty benefits that is either a corporation owning, directly or indirectly, less than 10% of the voting stock of a Japanese corporation or an individual is generally reduced to 10% of the gross amount actually distributed, except where such United States resident conducts business in Japan through a permanent establishment situated therein and the holding in respect of which the dividends are paid is effectively connected with such permanent establishment. Dividends paid to pension funds which are qualified United States residents eligible to enjoy treaty benefits are exempt from Japanese income taxation by way of withholding or otherwise unless such dividends are derived from the carrying on of a business, directly or indirectly, by such pension funds. Under Japanese tax law, any reduced maximum rate applicable under a tax treaty shall be available when such maximum rate is below the rate otherwise applicable

under the Japanese tax law referred to in the preceding paragraph with respect to the dividends to be paid by us on shares of our common stock or ADSs. Anon-resident holder of shares of our common stock who is entitled, under any applicable tax treaty, to a reduced rate of Japanese withholding tax, or exemption therefrom, as the case may be, is required to submit an Application Form for Income Tax Convention Regarding Relief from Japanese Income Tax and Special Income Tax for Reconstruction on Dividends (together with any other required forms and documents) in advance, through the withholding agent, to the relevant tax authority before payment of dividends. A standing proxy for anon-resident holder may provide such application service. In addition, a certain simplified special filing procedure is available fornon-resident holders to claim treaty benefits of exemption from or reduction of Japanese withholding tax, by submitting a Special Application Form for Income Tax Convention Regarding Relief from Japanese Income Tax and Special Income Tax for Reconstruction on Dividends of Listed Stocks (together with any other required forms and documents). With respect to ADSs, this reduced rate or exemption will be applicable tonon-resident holders of ADSs if the depositary or its Agent submits two Application Forms (one before payment of dividends and the other within eight months after the record date concerning such payment of dividends,dividends), together with certain other documents. To claim this reduced rate or exemption,non-resident holders of ADSs will be required to file a proof of taxpayer status, residence and beneficial ownership, as applicable, and to provide other information or documents as may be required by the depositary.Non-resident holders who are entitled, under any applicable tax treaty, to a reduced rate of Japanese withholding tax below the rate otherwise applicable under Japanese tax law, or exemption therefrom, as the case may be, but fail to submit the required application in advance may nevertheless be entitled to claim a refund from the relevant Japanese tax authority of withholding taxes withheld in excess of the rate under an applicable tax treaty (if suchnon-resident holders are entitled to a reduced treaty rate under the applicable tax treaty) or the full amount of tax withheld (if suchnon-resident holders are entitled to an exemption under the applicable tax treaty), as the case may be, by complying with a certain subsequent filing procedure.

We do not assume any responsibility to ensure withholding at the reduced rate, or exemption therefrom, fornon-resident holders who would be so eligible under an applicable tax treaty but where the required procedures as stated above are not followed.

Gains derived from the sale or other disposition of shares of our common stock or ADSs outside Japan by anon-resident holder, who is a portfolio investor, are not, in general, subject to Japanese income tax or corporation tax.

Any deposits or withdrawals of shares of our common stock by anon-resident holder in exchange for ADSs are, in general, not subject to Japanese income or corporation tax.

Japanese inheritance and gift taxes, at progressive rates, may be payable by an individual who has acquired our shares of our common stock or ADSs from an individual, as a legatee, heir or donee, even if none of the acquiring individual, the decedent or the donor is a Japanese resident.

U.S. Taxation

The following sets forth the material United States federal income tax consequences of the ownership of shares and ADSs as of the date hereof. The discussion set forth below is applicable to U.S. holders (as defined below) (i) who are residents of the United States for purposes of the current income tax treaty between Japan and the United States (the “Treaty”), (ii) whose shares or ADSs are, for purposes of the Treaty, neither effectively connected with nor attributable to a permanent establishment in Japan and (iii) who otherwise qualify for the full benefits of the Treaty.

The following summary is not a complete analysis or description of all potential U.S. federal income tax consequences to a particular U.S. holder. It does not address all U.S. federal income tax considerations that may be relevant to all categories of potential purchasers, certain of which (such as banks or other financial institutions, insurance companies, dealers in securities or currencies,tax-exempt entities,non-U.S. persons,

persons holding a share or an ADS as part of a “straddle,” “hedge,” conversion or integrated transaction, partnerships or other pass-through entities for U.S. federal income tax purposes, traders in securities who have elected themark-to-market method of accounting for their securities, regulated investment companies, real estate investment trusts, holders whose “functional currency” is not the U.S. dollar, holders liable for alternative minimum tax, persons required to accelerate the recognition of any item of gross income with respect to shares or ADSs as a result of such income being recognized on an applicable financial statement and holders of 10% or more of our voting shares)shares by vote or value) are subject to special tax treatment. This summary does not address the Medicare tax on net investment income or any foreign, state, local or other tax consequences of investments in our shares or ADSs.

This summary addresses only shares or ADSs held as capital assets.

As used herein, a “U.S. holder” is a beneficial owner of shares or ADSs, as the case may be, that is, for U.S. federal income tax purposes:

 

an individual citizen or resident of the United States;

 

a corporation (or other entity treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) created or organized in or under the laws of the United States or any political subdivision thereof;

 

an estate, the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income tax regardless of its source; or

 

a trust if it (1) is subject to the primary supervision of a court within the United States and the control of one or more U.S. persons as described in Section 7701(a)(30) of the Code or (2) has a valid election in effect under applicable U.S. Treasury regulations to be treated as a U.S. person.

If a partnership holds shares or ADSs, the tax treatment of a partner will generally depend on the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. If you are a partner of a partnership holding shares or ADSs, you should consult your tax advisor.

The discussion below is based upon the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and regulations, rulings and judicial decisions thereunder as of the date hereof, and such authorities may be replaced, revoked or modified so as to result in U.S. federal income tax consequences different from those discussed below. In addition, this summary is based, in part, upon representations made by the depositary to us and assumes that the deposit agreement, and all other related agreements, will be performed in accordance with their terms.

We urge U.S. holders to consult their own tax advisors concerning the U.S. federal, state and local and other tax consequences to them of the purchase, ownership and disposition of shares or ADSs.

ADSs

If a U.S. holder holds ADSs, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, such holder will generally be treated as the owner of the underlying shares that are represented by such ADSs. Accordingly, deposits or withdrawals of shares in exchange for ADSs are not subject to U.S. federal income tax.

Taxation of Dividends

Subject to the discussion under “—U.S. Taxation—Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules” below, the gross amount of any distribution received with respect to our shares or ADSs (including amounts withheld to reflect Japanese withholding taxes), will be taxable as dividends, to the extent paid out of theour current or accumulated earnings and profits (as determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes). The amount of distribution of property other than cash will be the fair market value of such property on the date of the distribution. Such cash ornon-cash income, including withheld taxes, will be includable in a U.S. holder’s gross

income as ordinary income on the day actually or constructively received by such U.S. holder in the case of shares, or by the depositary in the case of ADSs. Such dividends received by a U.S. holder will not be eligible for the “dividends-received deduction” allowed to U.S. corporations in respect of dividends received from other U.S. corporations. To the extent that an amount received by a U.S. holder exceeds such holder’s allocable share of our current and accumulated earnings and profits, such excess will be applied first to reduce such holder’s tax basis in its shares or ADSs, thereby increasing the amount of gain or decreasing the amount of loss recognized on a subsequent disposition of the shares or ADSs. Then, to the extent such distribution exceeds such U.S. holder’s tax basis, such excess will be treated as capital gain. However, we do not expect to keep earnings and profits in accordance with U.S. federal income tax principles. Therefore, U.S. holders should expect that a distribution will generally be treated as a dividend.

The amount of the dividend paid in yen will be the U.S. dollar value of the yen payments received. This value will be determined at the spot yen/U.S. dollar rate on the date the dividend is received by the depositary in the case of U.S. holders of ADSs, or by the shareholder in the case of U.S. holders of shares, regardless of whether the dividend payment is in fact converted into U.S. dollars at that time. If the yen received as a dividend are not converted into U.S. dollars on the date of receipt, a U.S. holder will have basis in such yen equal to their dollar value on the date of receipt, and any foreign currency gains or losses resulting from the conversion of the yen will generally be treated as U.S. source ordinary income or loss.

The maximum rate of withholding tax on dividends paid to you pursuant to the Treaty is 10%. As discussed under “ —Japanese“—Japanese Taxation” above, if the Japanese statutory rate applicable to you is higher than the maximum Treaty rate, you will be required to properly demonstrate to the Japanese tax authorities your entitlement to the reduced withholding rate under the Treaty. Subject to certain limitations, the Japanese tax withheld may be creditable against the U.S. holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability or may be claimed as a deduction from the U.S. holder’s federal adjusted gross income provided that the U.S. holder elects to deduct all foreign taxes paid or accrued in the same taxable year. For foreign tax credit limitation purposes, the dividend will be income from sources outside the United States. The limitation on foreign taxes eligible for credit is calculated separately with respect to specific classes of income. For this purpose, dividends we pay will generally constitute “passive category income.” Further, in certain circumstances, if a U.S. holder:

 

has held shares or ADSs for less than a specified minimum period during which such U.S. holder is not protected from the risk of loss; or

 

is obligated to make payments related to the dividends,

such U.S. holder will not be allowed a foreign tax credit for foreign taxes imposed on dividends paid on shares or ADSs. The rules governing U.S. foreign tax credits are very complex and U.S. holders should consult their tax advisors regarding the availability of foreign tax credits under their particular circumstances.

With respect tonon-corporate U.S. investors, certain dividends received from a qualified foreign corporation may be subject to reduced rates of taxation. A qualified foreign corporation includes a corporation that is eligible for the benefits of a comprehensive income tax treaty with the United States which the U.S. Treasury Department determines to be satisfactory for these purposes and which includes an exchange of information provision. The U.S. Treasury Department has determined that the Treaty meets these requirements. In addition, it is expected that we will be eligible for the benefits of the Treaty. A foreign corporation is also

treated as a qualified foreign corporation with respect to dividends paid by that corporation on shares (or ADSs backed by such shares) that are readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States. United States Treasury Department guidance indicates that our ADSs (which are listed on the New York Stock Exchange), but not the shares, are readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States. There can be no assurance that our ADSs will be considered readily tradable on an established securities market in later years.Non-corporate holders who do not meet a minimum holding period requirement during which they are not protected from a risk of loss or that elect to treat the dividend income as “investment income” pursuant to Section 163(d)(4) of the Code will not be eligible for the reduced rates of taxation. In addition, the rate reduction

will not apply to dividends if the recipient of a dividend is obligated to make related payments with respect to positions in substantially similar or related property. This disallowance applies even if the minimum holding period has been met. U.S. holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the application of the foregoing rules to their particular circumstances.

Taxation of Capital Gains

Upon a sale or other disposition of shares or ADSs, a U.S. holder will recognize gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between the U.S. dollar value of the amount realized and the U.S. holder’s tax basis, determined in U.S. dollars, in such shares or ADSs. Subject to the discussion under “—U.S. Taxation—Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules” below, such gain or loss will be capital gain or loss and will be long-term capital gain or loss if the U.S. holder’s holding period for such shares or ADSs exceeds one year. A U.S. holder’s tax basis in its shares or ADSs will generally be the cost to the holder of such shares or ADSs. Any such gain or loss realized by a U.S. holder upon disposal of the shares or ADSs will generally be income or loss from sources within the United States for foreign tax credit limitation purposes. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations.

Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules

Based on our past and projected composition of income and assets and the valuation of our assets, including goodwill, we do not believe that we were a passive foreign investment company (“PFIC”) for our most recent taxable year and do not expect to become one in the current taxable year or the foreseeable future, although there can be no assurance in this regard. However, PFIC status is a factual determination that is made annually. Accordingly, it is possible that we may become a PFIC in the current or any future taxable year due to changes in valuation orthe composition of our income or assets or the valuation of our assets. In addition, this determination is based in part upon certain proposed U.S. Treasury regulations that are not yet in effect (the “Proposed Regulations”) and are subject to change in the future. The Proposed Regulations and other administrative pronouncements from the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) provide special rules for determining the character of income and assets derived in the banking business for purposes of the PFIC rules. Although we believe we have adopted a reasonable interpretation of the Proposed Regulations and administrative pronouncements, there can be no assurance that the IRS will follow the same interpretation.

In general, a foreign corporation is considered a PFIC for any taxable year if either:

 

at least 75% of its gross income is passive income; or

 

at least 50% of the value of its assets is attributable to assets that produce or are held for the production of passive income.

The 50% of value test is based on the average of the value of our assets for each quarter during the taxable year. If we own at least 25% by value of another company’s stock, we will be treated, for purposes of the PFIC rules, as owning the proportionate share of the assets and receiving our proportionate share of the income of that company.

If we are a PFIC for any taxable year during which a U.S. holder holds shares or ADSs, the U.S. holder will be subject to special tax rules with respect to any “excess distribution” that the U.S. holder receives and any gain the U.S. holder realizes from the sale or other disposition (including a pledge) of shares or ADSs. Additionally,non-corporate U.S. holders will not be eligible for reduced rates of taxation on any dividends received from us if we are a PFIC in the taxable year in which such dividends are paid or in the preceding taxable year.

These special tax rules generally will apply even if we cease to be a PFIC in future years. Distributions U.S. holders receive in a taxable year that are greater than 125% of the average annual distributions they received

during the shorter of the three preceding taxable years or their holding period for shares or ADSs will be treated as excess distributions. Under these special tax rules:

 

the excess distribution or gain will be allocated ratably over the U.S. holder’s holding period for shares or ADSs;

 

the amount allocated to the current taxable year, and any taxable year prior to the first taxable year in which we were a PFIC, will be treated as ordinary income; and

 

the amount allocated to each other year will be subject to tax at the highest tax rate in effect for that year, and the interest charge generally applicable to underpayments of tax will be imposed on the resulting tax attributable to each such year.

Alternatively, a U.S. holder could make amark-to-market election provided that shares or ADSs are regularly traded on a qualified exchange. Under current law, themark-to-market election may be available to U.S. holders of ADSs because the ADSs are listed on the New York Stock Exchange which constitutes a qualified exchange, although there can be no assurance that the ADSs will be “regularly traded” for purposes of themark-to-market election. Under current law, themark-to-market election may be available to U.S. holders of shares because the shares are listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange, which constitutes a qualified exchange, although there can be no assurance that the shares will be “regularly traded” for purposes of themark-to-market election. U.S. holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the potential availability and consequences of amark-to-market election. In addition, a U.S. holder of shares or ADSs in a PFIC can sometimes avoid the rules described above by electing to treat the company as a “qualified electing fund” under Section 1295 of the Code. This option is not available to U.S. holders of shares or ADSs because we do not intend to comply with the requirements necessary to permit U.S. holders to make this election.

If a U.S. holder holds shares or ADSs in any year in which we are classified as a PFIC, such holder may be required to file IRS Form 8621.

U.S. holders should consult their own tax advisors concerning the determination of our PFIC status and the U.S. federal income tax consequences of holding shares or ADSs if we are considered a PFIC in any taxable year.

Information Reporting and Backup Withholding

In general, information reporting requirements will apply to dividends in respect of the shares or ADSs or the proceeds from the sale, exchange or redemption of the shares or ADSs paid within the United States, and, in some cases, outside of the United States, to you, unless you are an exempt recipient. In addition, backup withholding tax may apply to those amounts if you fail to provide an accurate taxpayer identification number or fail either to report interest and dividends required to be shown on your U.S. federal income tax returns or make certain certifications. The amount of any backup withholding from a payment to you will be allowed as a refund or credit against your U.S. federal income tax liability, provided you furnish the required information to the IRS.

Certain U.S. holders are required to report information with respect to their investment in shares or ADSs not held in an account maintained by certain financial institutions to the IRS. Investors who fail to report required

information by attaching a complete IRS Form 8938, Statement of Specified Foreign Financial Assets, on their tax return for each year in which they hold shares or ADSs could become subject to substantial penalties. Potential investors are urged to consult with their own tax advisors regarding the possible implications of these rules on their investment in shares or ADSs.

10.F. Dividends and Paying Agents

Not applicable.

10.G. Statement by Experts

Not applicable.

10.H. Documents on Display

We file annual reports on Form20-F with, and furnish periodic reports on Form6-K to, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. These reports, including this annual report on Form20-F and the exhibits thereto, and other information can be inspected without charge at the Commission’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. You can also obtain copies of such materials by mail, at prescribed fees, from the Commission’s Public Reference Room or from commercial document retrieval services. You may obtain information on the operation of the Commission’s Public Reference Room by calling the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in the United States at1-800-SEC-0330. You can also access to the documents filed via the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval system on the Commission’s website (http://www.sec.gov).

10.I. Subsidiary Information

Not applicable.

ITEM 11.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT CREDIT, MARKET AND OTHER RISK

Amid the growing diversity and complexity of banking operations, financial institutions are exposed to various risks, including credit, market, operations, information technology, legal, settlement and other risks. We recognize the conducting of operations tailored to the risks and managing such risks as a key issue relating to overall management. In order to implement our business strategy while maintaining our financial stability, we maintain comprehensive risk management and control measures. We maintainMizuho Financial Group maintains basic policies for risk management established by our Board of Directors that are applicable to the entire Mizuho group. These policies clearly define the kinds of risks to be managed, set forth the organizational structure and provide for the human resources training necessary for appropriate levels of risk management. The policies also provide for audits to measure the effectiveness and suitability of the risk management structure. In line with these basic policies, we maintain various measures to strengthen and enhance the sophistication of our risk management system.

All yen figures and percentages in this item are truncated. Accordingly, the total of each column of figures may not be equal to the total of the individual items.

Approach to the Basel Regulatory Framework

Basel III Framework, the regulations for international standards of the health of banks, is being phased in from 2013, which consists of minimum capital requirements, a leverage ratio and a global liquidity standard. Basel III is based on the Basel II framework which requires the observance of “three pillars.” “Pillar 1” is minimum requirements relating to risk which should be maintained by banks. “Pillar 2” is the self-disciplined risk management by financial institutions with a supervisory review process. “Pillar 3” is market discipline allowing for assessment by the market through appropriate disclosure.

We have been calculating our capital adequacy ratios by applying the advanced internal rating based approach (the “AIRB”) for the calculation of credit risk from March 31, 2009 and the advanced measurement approach (the “AMA”) for the calculation of operational risk from September 30, 2009. In Japan, from March 31, 2013, the minimum capital requirements based on Basel III began to be phased in, and we have been calculating capital adequacy ratios based on the revisions to capital adequacy guidelines published by the Financial Services Agency. The Basel Committee continues to review the treatments related to capital requirements. We will comply with new requirements appropriately. We have been identified as aG-SIB by the Financial Stability Board since November 2015, and the stricter capital requirements began to be phased in from March 31, 2016.

A leverage ratio also has been implemented under “Pillar 3” from March 31, 2015, and we began disclosing it accordingly. Also a global liquidity standard has been implemented under “Pillar 1” from March 31, 2015 in Japan, and we have been calculating and disclosing our liquidity coverage ratio pursuant to such standard.

Overview of Risk Management

Risk Management Structure

Each of our subsidiaries adopts appropriate risk management measures for its business based on the size and nature of its risk exposures, while Mizuho Financial Group controls risk management for the Mizuho group as a whole. At Mizuho Financial Group, the Risk Management Committee, which is one of the Business Policy Committees of Mizuho Financial Group, chaired by the Group Chief Risk Officer, provides integrated monitoring and management of the overall risk for the Mizuho group. The Group Chief Risk Officer reports the risk management situation to the Board of Directors, the Risk Committee and the Executive Management Committee, and the President & Group CEO,etc., on a regular basis and as needed. Mizuho Financial Group regularly receives reports and applications concerning the risk management situation from our principal banking subsidiaries and other core group companies and gives them appropriate instructions concerning risk management. Our principal banking subsidiaries and other core group companies each maintains itsmaintain their own systemsystems for managing various types of risk, regularly receiving reports on the status of risk at their respective subsidiaries, and gives them appropriate instructions concerning risk management.

management as necessary.

Basic Approach

We classify our risk exposures according to the various kindsrisks arising from the group’s businesses into different types of risk includingsuch as credit risk, market risk, liquidity risk and operational risk according to their risk factors, and manage each type of risk depending on its characteristics. Furthermore, each group entity manages such risks according to the characteristics of its characteristics.business operations (i.e., management of risks associated with settlement and trust businesses, etc.). In addition to managing each type of risk individually, we have established a comprehensive risk management structure to identify and evaluate overall risk and where necessary, to devise appropriate responses to keep risk within limits that are managerially acceptable in both qualitative and quantitative terms.acceptable. In line with the basic policies relating to overall risk management laid down by Mizuho Financial Group, companies within the Mizuho group identify risk broadly and take a proactive and sophisticated approach to risk management, including methodologies for operations that involve exposures to multiple categories of risk such as settlement and trust businesses.management.

Risk Capital Allocation

We endeavor to obtain a clear grasp of the group’s overall risk exposure and have implemented measures to keepcontrol such risks within the group’s financial base in accordance with the risk capital allocation framework. More specifically, we allocate risk capital to our principal banking subsidiaries, including their respective subsidiaries, and other core group companies to control risk within the limits set for each company. We also control risk

within managerially acceptable limits by working to ensure that the overall risk we hold on a consolidated basis does not exceed shareholders’ equity and other measures ofour financial strength. To ensure the ongoing financial soundness of Mizuho Financial Group, our principal banking subsidiaries and other core group companies, we regularly monitor the manner in which risk capital is being used in order to obtain a proper grasp of the risk profile within this framework. Reports are also submitted to the Board of Directors and other committees of each company. Risk capital is allocated to Mizuho Bank, Mizuho Trust & Banking, Mizuho Securities and Mizuho Americas by risk category, and is further allocated within their respective business units based on established frameworks.

As partStress Testing

For the purpose of verifying the appropriateness of the Mizuho group’s risk appetite and the adequacy of its business plans, we carry out stress testing on our entire portfolio by measuring and assessing the impacts on our capital ratio and financial performance of the stress events assumed in the scenarios set by the group. Stress testing is carried out to confirm that the required capital ratio and financial performance can be secured on the occurrence of any of the assumed stress events. When our capital ratio or financial performance falls below the required level, we will consider and carry out a revision of our risk capital allocation management, we create multiple risk scenarios common toappetite and business plans. We also calculate the group, based on which we and our principal banking subsidiaries calculate potential losses and risk amount arising fromimpacts of assumed stress events across allon risk types.volumes, including interest rate risk related to our banking book that is not covered by regulatory capital, to confirm whether the risk volumes balance with the group’s capital when a risk event occurs. The calculated losses and risk amountvolumes are used for assessing the group’s internal capital adequacyadequacy. Risk scenarios are set considering the current and verifying whether they balance withprojected economic conditions, as well as vulnerabilities in the group’s capital.

Thebusiness and financial structure. Moreover, we have established a robust risk scenarios formanagement framework under which stress testing is respectively carried out for each risk category, including market risk. Through such stress testing, we deepen our understanding of the distinctive features of our businesses and portfolios, and proactively determine action to be taken if a stress event happens. In this way, we are formulated by taking into account the current economic conditions and the economic outlook and by assuming historical stress events, etc. from acommitted to enhancing our risk management perspective to measure the impacts of stress events by scenario.capabilities on a continued basis.

(Assessment of Balance between Risk under Stressed Condition and Capital)

LOGO

Credit Risk Management

We define credit risk as the Mizuho group’s exposure to the risk of losses that may be incurred due to a decline in, or total loss of, the value of assets (includingoff-balance-sheet instruments), as a result of deterioration in obligors’ financial position. We haveMizuho Financial Group has established the methods and structures necessary for grasping and managing credit risk. Mizuho Financial Group manages credit risk for the Mizuho group as a whole. More specifically, we have adopted two different but mutually complementary approaches inSpecifically, Mizuho Financial Group establishes the group’s fundamental credit risk management. The first approach is “credit management,” in which wepolicy to manage major group companies, and monitors and manages the process for each individual transaction and individual obligor from execution until collection, based on our assessmentcredit risks of the credit quality of the customer. Through this process, we curb losses in the case ofgroup as a credit event. The second is “credit portfolio management,” in which we utilize statistical methods to assess the potential for losses related to credit risk. Through this process, we identify credit risks and respond appropriately.whole.

Credit Risk Management Structure

Credit Risk Management of the Mizuho Group

Our Board of Directors determines the Mizuho group’s basic matters pertaining to credit risk management. In addition, the Risk Management Committee of Mizuho Financial Group broadly discusses and coordinates matters relating to basic policies and operations in connection with credit risk management and matters relating to credit risk monitoring for the Mizuho group. Under the control of the Group Chief Risk Officer of Mizuho Financial Group, the Credit Risk Management Department and the Risk Management Department jointly monitor, analyze and submit suggestions concerning credit risk and formulate and execute plans in connection with basic matters pertaining to credit risk management.

Credit Risk Management at Our Principal Banking Subsidiaries and Other Core Group Companies

Our principal banking subsidiaries and other core group companies manage their credit risk according to the scale and nature of their exposures in line with basic policies set forth by Mizuho Financial Group. The Board of Directors of each company determines key matters pertaining to credit risk management.

The business policy committees established respectively byBalance Sheet & Risk Management Committee and the Credit Committee, each of which is a Business Policy Committee of our principal banking subsidiaries, are responsible for discussing and coordinating overall management of their individual credit portfolios and transaction policies towards obligors. The respective Chief Risk Officers of our principal banking subsidiaries are responsible for matters relating to planning and implementing credit risk management. The credit risk management departments of our principal banking subsidiaries are in charge of planning and administering credit risk management and conducting credit risk measuring and monitoring. The departments regularly present reports regarding their risk management situation to Mizuho Financial Group. The credit departments of our principal banking subsidiaries determine policies and approve/disapprove individual transactions in terms of credit review, credit management and collection from customers in accordance with the lines of authority set forth respectively by our principal banking subsidiaries. In addition, our principal banking subsidiaries have established internal audit groups that are independent of the business departments in order to ensure appropriate credit risk management.

Method of Credit Risk Management

We have adopted two different but mutually complementary approaches to credit risk management. The first approach is “individual credit management,” in which we manage the process for each individual transaction and individual obligor from execution until collection, based on our assessment of the credit quality of the customer. Through this process, we curb losses in the case of a credit event. The second is “credit portfolio management,” in which we utilize statistical methods to assess the potential for losses related to credit risk. Through this process, we identify credit risks and respond appropriately.

Individual Credit Management

Credit Codes

The basic code of conduct for all of our officers and employees engaged in the credit business is set forth in our credit code. Seeking to fulfill the bank’s publicmission and social role,responsibilities, our basic policy for credit business is determined in light of fundamental principles focusing on public welfare, safety, growth and profitability.

Internal Rating System

One of the most important elements of the risk management infrastructure of our principal banking subsidiaries is the use of an internal rating system that consists of credit ratings and pool allocations. Credit ratings consist of obligor ratings which represent the level of credit risk of the obligor, and transaction ratings which represent the possibility of ultimately incurring losses related to each individual claim by taking into consideration the nature of any collateral or guarantee and the seniority of the claim. In principle, obligor ratings apply to all obligors and are subject to regular reviews at least once a year to reflect promptly the fiscal period end financial results of the obligors, as well as special reviews as required whenever a obligor’s credit standing changes. This enables our principal banking subsidiaries to monitor both individual obligors and the status of the overall portfolio in a timely fashion. Because we consider obligor ratings to be an initial phase of the self-assessment process regarding the quality of our loans andoff-balance-sheet instruments, such obligor ratings are closely linked to the obligor classifications and are an integral part of the process for determining the provision for loan losses and charge-offs in our self-assessment of loans andoff-balance-sheet instruments.

To assign obligor ratings, we have a quantitative evaluation system (rating model) in place to enable proper assessment of an obligor’s credit standing. The system gives a quantitative rating to an obligor based on obligor-specific characteristics such as type of business (corporation or individual) and geography (in Japan or outside Japan). We categorize our rating models for companies in Japan into those for large companies and those for small andmedium-sized companies. The former consist of 13 models according to industry-specific factors, while the latter consist of three models. For companies outside Japan, we utilize nine models.

These were developed by the Credit Risk Management Department based on a statistical methodology and approved by the Chief Risk Officer.

Pool allocations are applied to small claims that are less than a specified amount by pooling customers and claims with similar risk characteristics and assessing and managing the risk for each such pool. WeOur principal banking subsidiaries efficiently manage credit risk and credit screening by dispersing a sufficient number of small claims within each pool. WeOur principal banking subsidiaries generally review the appropriateness and effectiveness of our approach to obligor ratings and pool allocations once a year in accordance with predetermined procedures.procedures, which is audited by the Internal Audit Group.

Mizuho Financial Group defines a Restructured Loan as a loan extended to a Customer with Special Attention when the following conditions are met: we are aiming for business reconstruction or financial support; and lending conditions were amended favorably to the customer such as allowing interest rate reduction, postponement of principal repayment/interest payment, debt forgiveness, etc.

An overdue loan is defined as a loan for a Customer with Special Attention of which the loan principal or interest is overdue for three months or more following the contractual payment date.

Self-assessment, Provision for Loan Losses andOff-Balance-Sheet Instruments and Charge-Offs

We conduct self-assessment of assets to ascertain the status of assets both as an integral part of credit risk management and in preparation for appropriate accounting treatment, including provision for loan losses andoff-balance-sheet instruments and charge-offs. During the process of self-assessment, obligors are categorized into certain groups taking into consideration their financial condition and their ability to make payments, and credit ratings are assigned to all obligors, in principle, to reflect the extent of their credit risks. The related assets are then categorized into certain classes based on the risk of impairment. This process allows us to identify and control the actual quality of assets and determine the appropriate accounting treatment, including provision for loan losses andoff-balance-sheet instruments and charge-offs. Specifically, the credit risk management department of each of our principal subsidiaries is responsible for the overall control of the self-assessment of assets of the respective banking subsidiaries, cooperating with the administrative departments specified for each type of asset, including loan portfolios and securities, in executing and managing self-assessments. In our assessment of the probability of obligor bankruptcy, we deem an obligor that is rated as being insolvent or lower as being bankrupt.

Credit Review

Prevention of new impaired loans through routine credit management is important in maintaining the quality of our overall loan assets. Credit review involves analysis and screening of each potential transaction within the relevant business department. In case the screening exceeds the authority of the department, the credit groupdepartment in charge at headquarters carries out the review. The credit group has specialist departments for different industries, business sizes and regions, carries out timely and specialized examinations based on the characteristics of the customer and its market, and provides appropriate advice to the business department. In addition, in the case of obligors with low credit ratings and high downside risks, the business department and credit department jointly clarify their credit policy and in appropriate cases assist the obligors at an early stage in working towards credit soundness.

Credit Portfolio Management

Risk Measurement

We use statistical methodsmethodologies that involve a risk measurement system (enterprise value corporate valuation model, holding period of one year) to manage the possibility of losses by measuring the expected average loss for aone-year risk horizon (“Expected Loss”) and the maximum loss within a certain confidence

interval (“credit VaR”VAR”). The difference between expected loss and credit VaRVAR is measured as the credit risk amount (“Unexpected Loss”). The risk measurement system covers the following account items reported by each Mizuho Financial Group company: credit transactions including loans and discounts; securities; customer’s liabilities for acceptances and guarantees; deposits and foreign exchange; derivatives including swaps and options;off-balance sheet items including commitments; and other assets involving credit risk.

In establishing transaction spread guidelines for credit transactions, we aim to ensure an appropriate return from the transaction in light of the level of risk by utilizing credit cost data as a reference. Also, we monitor our credit portfolio from various perspectives and set guidelines noted below so that losses incurred through a hypothetical realization of the full credit VaRVAR would be within the amount of risk capital and loan loss reserves.

Risk Control Methods

WeOur principal banking subsidiaries recognize two types ofthe risk arising from allowing unexpected loss to become too large. One type isOur principal banking subsidiaries manage “credit concentration risk,” which stems from granting excessive credit to certain individual counterparties or corporate groups. The other type is “chain-reaction default risk,” which arises from granting excessive credit to certain, areas, industrial sectors and other groupings. We make appropriate management to control these risksgroups in line with our specific guidelines for each. The individual risk management departmentsguidelines. Our principal banking subsidiaries also set the credit limit based on verification of status of capital adequacy. In cases where the limit is exceeded, our principal banking subsidiaries are responsible for monitoring adherencewill formulate a handling policy and/or action plan. In addition to these guidelinesthe above, our principal banking subsidiaries monitor total credit exposure, credit exposure per rating, credit concentration per individual corporate group, geography and reportingbusiness sector to their respective business policy committees.

Market and Liquiditymake a periodical report to the Balance Sheet & Risk Management Committee and the Credit Committee.

The following diagram shows our risk management structure:

LOGO

Market Risk Management

We define market risk as the risk of losses incurred by the group due to fluctuations in interest rates, stock prices and foreign exchange rates. Our definitionMarket risk includes market liquidity risk; i.e., the risk of losses incurred when it becomes impossiblethat we will suffer a loss due to executemarket disruptions or other disorders that prevent us from conducting transactions in the market because of market confusion or losses arising from transactions at prices that are significantly less favorable than usual. We define liquidity risk as the risk of losses arising from funding difficulties due to a deterioration in our financial position that makes it difficult forrequire us to raise necessary funds or that forces us to raise funds atpay significantly higher interest ratesprices than usual.normal to conduct transactions. Mizuho Financial Group manages market and liquidity risk for the Mizuho group as a whole.

The following diagram shows our Specifically, Mizuho Financial Group establishes the fundamental risk management structure:policy for the entire group, manages the market risk of our principal banking subsidiaries and other core group companies and monitors how the group’s market risk is being managed as a whole.

LOGO

Market Risk Management Structure

Market Risk Management of the Mizuho Group

Our Board of Directors determines basic matters pertaining to market risk management policies. The Risk Management Committee of Mizuho Financial Group broadly discusses and coordinates matters relating to basic policies in connection with market risk management, market risk operations and market risk monitoring. The Group Chief Risk Officer of Mizuho Financial Group is responsible for matters relating to market risk management planning and operations.

The Risk Management Department of Mizuho Financial Group is responsible for monitoring market risk, reportsreporting and analyses,analysing, making proposals, setting limits and guidelines, and formulating and implementing plans relating to market risk management. The

As for the situation of market risk, the Risk Management Department assessessubmits reports to the President and managesGroup CEO on a daily basis and to the overallBoard of Directors on a regular basis. For the purpose of managing the market risk of the Mizuho group. It also receives reports from our principal banking subsidiaries and other core group companies, onthe Department regularly receives reports from each of them to properly identify and manage their market risk management that enable it to obtain a solid grasprisk. These subsidiaries and core group companies, which account for most of the Mizuho group’s exposure to market risk, situation, submitting reports to the President & Group CEOestablish their basic policies based on a daily basisours, and to our Boardtheir Boards of Directors and the Executivedetermine important matters relating to market risk management.

Market Risk Management Committee of Mizuho Financial Group on a regular basis.Method

To manage market risk, we set limits that correspond to risk capital allocations according to the risk profilesprofile of each of our principal banking subsidiaries and other core group companies and thereby prevent the overall market risk we hold from exceeding our ability to withstand losses based on our financial strength represented by capital, etc. The amount of risk capital allocated to market risk corresponds to VaRvalue-at-risk (the “VAR”) and additional costs that may arise in order to close relevant positions. For trading

Setting Limits

When the said limits are set, various factors are taken into account, including business strategies, historical limit usage ratios, risk-bearing capacity (profits, equity capital and banking activities, we set limits for VaRrisk management framework), profit targets and for losses. For banking activities, we set position limits based on interest rate sensitivity as needed.

Thesethe market liquidity of the products involved. The limits are discussed and coordinated by the Risk Management Committee, discussed further by the Executive Management Committee and then determined by the President & Group CEO. Various factors are taken into account including business strategies, historical limit usage ratios, risk-bearing capacity (profits, total capitalFor trading and risk management systems), profit targetsbanking activities, we set limits for VAR and the market liquidityfor losses. For banking activities, we set position limits based on interest rate sensitivity (10 BPV) as needed. An excess over any of the products involved.

Market Risk Management at Our Principal Banking Subsidiariesthese limits is immediately reported and Other Core Group Companies

Our principal banking subsidiaries and other core group companies, which account for most of the Mizuho group’s exposure to market risk, have formulated their basic policies in line with the basic policies determined by Mizuho Financial Group. Their Boards of Directors determine important matters relating to market risk management while their Chief Executive Officers are responsible for controlling market risk. Their respective business policy committees, including their Balance Sheet & Risk Management Committees, are responsible for overall discussion and coordination of market risk management. Specifically, these committees discuss and coordinate matters relating to basic asset and liability management policies, risk planning and market risk management. The Chief Risk Officer of each subsidiary is responsible for matters pertaining to planning and implementing market risk management. Based on a common Mizuho group risk capital allocation framework, the above-mentioned companies manage market risk by setting limitsaddressed according to the risk capital allocated to market risk by Mizuho Financial Group.apre-determined procedure.

These companies have established specialized company-wide market risk management departments to provide integrated monitoring of market risk, submit reports, analyses and proposals, set limits and formulate and implement plans relating to market risk management. The risk management departments of each company submit reports on the status of market risk management to their respective Chief Executive Officers and top management on a daily basis, and to their Board of Directors and Executive Management Committee on a regular basis. They also provide regular reports to Mizuho Financial Group. Monitoring

To provide a system of mutual checks and balances in market operations, theywe have established middle offices specializing in risk management that are independent of their front offices which engage in market transactions and theirof back offices which are responsible for book entries and settlements. When VaRVAR is not adequate to control risk, the middle offices manage risk using

additional risk indices, carry out stress teststesting and set stop loss limits as needed. TheyWe monitor their market liquidity risk for individual financial products in the market while taking turnover and other factors into consideration.

Value-at-Risk

We use thevalue-at-risk (the “VaR”) VAR method, supplemented with stress testing, as our principal tool to measure market risk. The VaRVAR method measures the maximum possible loss that could be incurred due to market movements within a certain time period (or holding period) and degree of probability (or confidence interval).

Trading Activities

VaRVAR related to our trading activities is based on the following:

 

historical simulation method;

 

confidence interval:one-tailed 99.0%;

 

holding period of one day; and

 

historical observation period of three years.

The following tables show the VaRVAR related to our trading activities by risk category for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2015, 20162017, 2018 and 20172019 and as of March 31, 2015, 20162017, 2018 and 2017:2019:

 

  Fiscal year ended March 31, 2015   As of
March 31, 2015
   Fiscal year ended March 31, 2017   As of
March 31, 2017
 

Risk category

  Daily average   Maximum   Minimum     Daily average   Maximum   Minimum 
  (in billions of yen)   (in billions of yen) 

Interest rate

  ¥1.8   ¥2.6   ¥1.4   ¥1.5   ¥2.0   ¥3.6   ¥1.0   ¥1.0 

Foreign exchange

   3.0    5.8    1.6    5.6    0.5    1.6    0.1    0.1 

Equities

   0.5    1.3    0.2    0.3    0.4    3.2    0.1    0.9 

Commodities

   0.0    0.0    0.0    0.0    0.0    0.0    0.0    0.0 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

  ¥4.4   ¥7.1   ¥3.1   ¥6.5   ¥3.3   ¥5.8   ¥2.3   ¥2.6 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

  Fiscal year ended March 31, 2016   As of
March 31, 2016
   Fiscal year ended March 31, 2018   As of
March 31, 2018
 

Risk category

  Daily average   Maximum   Minimum     Daily average   Maximum   Minimum 
  (in billions of yen)   (in billions of yen) 

Interest rate

  ¥1.8   ¥3.7   ¥0.6   ¥1.1   ¥1.7   ¥2.5   ¥1.0   ¥2.2 

Foreign exchange

   0.9    2.3    0.2    0.3    0.4    1.2    0.1    0.1 

Equities

   0.6    2.5    0.1    0.3    0.6    2.4    0.3    0.5 

Commodities

   0.0    0.0    0.0    0.0    0.0    0.0    0.0    0.0 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

  ¥2.9   ¥4.5   ¥1.8   ¥2.0   ¥3.0   ¥6.2   ¥2.2   ¥3.0 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

  Fiscal year ended March 31, 2017   As of
March 31, 2017
   Fiscal year ended March 31, 2019   As of
March 31, 2019
 

Risk category

  Daily average   Maximum   Minimum     Daily average   Maximum   Minimum 
  (in billions of yen)   (in billions of yen) 

Interest rate

  ¥2.0   ¥3.6   ¥1.0   ¥1.0   ¥2.0   ¥2.9   ¥1.3   ¥2.0 

Foreign exchange

   0.5    1.6    0.1    0.1    0.8    2.8    0.1    0.3 

Equities

   0.4    3.2    0.1    0.9    0.6    7.7    0.2    0.5 

Commodities

   0.0    0.0    0.0    0.0    0.0    0.0    0.0    0.0 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

  ¥3.3   ¥5.8   ¥2.3   ¥2.6   ¥3.4   ¥9.2   ¥2.4   ¥2.6 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

The following graph shows VaRVAR figures of our trading activities for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017:2019:

(VAR : billions of yen)

 

LOGOLOGO

The following table shows VaRVAR figures of our trading activities for the fiscal years indicated:

 

  Fiscal years ended March 31,   Fiscal years ended March 31, 
  2015   2016   2017   Change   2017   2018   2019   Change 
  (in billions of yen)   (in billions of yen) 

As of fiscal year end

  ¥6.5   ¥2.0   ¥2.6   ¥0.5   ¥2.6   ¥3.0   ¥2.6   ¥(0.3

Maximum

   7.1    4.5    5.8    1.3    5.8    6.2    9.2    3.0 

Minimum

   3.1    1.8    2.3    0.5    2.3    2.2    2.4    0.2 

Average

   4.4    2.9    3.3    0.4    3.3    3.0    3.4    0.3 

Non-trading Activities

The VaRVAR related to our banking activities is based on the same conditions as those of trading activities, but the holding period is one month. In addition, as for risk management of banking activities, it is important to properly measure interest rate risk so that we calculate interest risk using appropriate methods such as recognizing demand deposits as “core deposits.”

The following graph shows the VaRVAR related to our banking activities excluding our cross-shareholdings portfolio for the year ended March 31, 2017:2019:

(VAR : billions of yen)

 

LOGOLOGO

The following table shows the VaRVAR figures relating to our banking activities for the fiscal years indicated:

 

  Fiscal years ended March 31,   Fiscal years ended March 31, 
  2015   2016   2017   Change   2017   2018   2019   Change 
  (in billions of yen)   (in billions of yen) 

As of fiscal year end

  ¥325.6   ¥321.5   ¥292.7   ¥(28.7  ¥292.7   ¥268.4   ¥194.4   ¥(74.0

Maximum

   349.0    360.6    397.5    36.9    397.5    307.2    298.5    (8.7

Minimum

   265.0    190.0    247.4    57.4    247.4    210.8    194.4    (16.3

Average

   307.9    284.9    331.0    46.1    331.0    267.8    255.5    (12.2

VaRVAR is a commonly used market risk management technique. However, VaRVAR models have the following shortcomings:

 

By its nature as a statistical approach, VaRVAR estimates possible losses over a certain period at a particular confidence level using past market movement data. Past market movement, however, is not necessarily a good indicator of future events, particularly potential future events that are extreme in nature.

 

VaRVAR may underestimate the probability of extreme market movements.

 

The use of a 99.0% confidence level does not take account of, nor makes any statement about, any losses that might occur beyond this confidence level.

 

VaRVAR does not capture all complex effects of various risk factors on the value of positions and portfolios and could underestimate potential losses.

We also conduct interest sensitivity analyses of interest risk, our main source of market risk. The following table shows sensitivity to yen interest risk in our banking activities as of the dates indicated. Interest rate sensitivity (10 BPV) shows how much net present value varies when interest rates rise by 10 basis points (0.1%), and it explains the impact of interest rate movements on net present value when short- and long-term interest rates behave differently.

   As of March 31,    
   2015  2016  2017  Change 
   (in billions of yen) 

Up to one year

  ¥(1 ¥(2 ¥(4 ¥(1

From one to five years

   (35  (21  (8  12 

Over five years

   (14  (25  (27  (1
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  ¥(51 ¥(50 ¥(40 ¥9 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cross-shareholdings Portfolio Management Activities

We take the market risk management approach with use of VaRVAR and risk indices for cross-shareholdings portfolio management activities as well as for trading activitiesto properly manage stock price risk. Specifically, we monitor VAR measurements andnon-trading activities. The the state of risk index forcapital on a daily basis. Moreover, in order to control stock price risk, we are working on the reduction in cross-shareholdings portfolio management for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, consisting of the sensitivity of the cross-shareholdings portfolio to a 1% change in the equity index of TOPIX, was ¥31.7 billion.through careful negotiations with counterparties.

Back Testing and Stress Testing

In order to evaluate the effectiveness of market risk measurements calculated using the VaRVAR method, we carry out regular back tests to compare VaRVAR with assumptive profits and losses. Assumptive profits and losses accounts for general market risk. The graph below shows daily VaRVAR of trading activities for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20172019 and the corresponding paired distribution of profits and losses. We had zero case where losses exceeded VaRVAR during the period. In addition, we conduct evaluations of the assumptions related to the VaRVAR models. Based on the number of times losses exceeded VaRVAR through back testing and the results of the evaluation of the model assumptions, we will make adjustments to the models as appropriate. We changed our VaR models from the varianceco-variance model to the Historical Simulation method, which has been used since the beginning of the fiscal year ended March 31,2017. Changes to fundamental portions of the VaRVAR models are subject to the approval of our Group Chief Risk Officer.

 

LOGOLOGO

 

Note:  We conduct our back testing and assess the number of cases where losses exceed VaRVAR based on a 250 business day year. The expected average number of instances whereone-day trading losses exceeded VaRVAR at the 99% confidence level is 2.5.

Stress Testing

Because the VaRVAR method is based on statistical assumptions, we conduct stress testing to simulate the levels of losses that could be incurred in cases where the market moves suddenly to levels that exceed these assumptions. The stress testing methods we use include the calculation of losses on the basis of the largest fluctuations occurring over a period of more than five yearsunder scenarios in which stresses are applied to interest rate risk and the calculation of lossesstock price risk based on market fluctuations occurring duringcurrent and projected economic conditions, historical market events. The following table showsevents, etc.

Liquidity Risk Management

We define liquidity risk as the assumed maximum loss resultsrisk of stress testing in trading activities using the methods described above:

Assumed maximum loss results

As of March 31, 2017
(in billions of yen)

Assumed maximum loss result calculated by stress testing (holding period: one month)

¥25.2

Outlier Criteria

As part of the capital adequacy requirements under the Basel Regulatory Framework, the losses arising from funding difficulties due to a banking bookdeterioration in hypotheticalour financial position that makes it difficult for us to raise necessary funds or that forces us to raise funds at significantly higher interest rate shock scenarios under certain stress conditions are calculated and compared with broadly-defined capital. Ifrates than usual. Mizuho Financial Group manages liquidity risk for the interest rateMizuho group as a whole. Specifically, Mizuho Financial Group establishes the fundamental liquidity risk management policy for the entire group, manages the liquidity risk of our principal banking subsidiaries and other core group companies and monitors how the banking book leads to an economic value decline of more than 20% of broadly-defined capital, we will be deemed an “outlier” and may be required to reduce the banking bookgroup’s liquidity risk or adopt other responses. We measure losses arising from our banking book each monthis being managed as a part of our stress tests.whole.

The table below shows the results of calculations of losses in the banking book in cases where interest rate fluctuations occur under stress conditions. The results of calculations of losses in the banking book show that they are 3.5% of broadly-defined capital. Because the amount of risk on the banking book is therefore well under the 20% threshold and within controllable limits, we do not fall under the “outlier” category.

Results of calculations under the outlier framework

  Amount of
loss
   Broadly-defined
capital
   Loss ratio to
capital
 
   (in billions of yen, except percentages) 

As of March 31, 2015

  ¥529.2   ¥9,508.4    5.5

As of March 31, 2016

   516.6    9,638.6    5.3 

As of March 31, 2017

   361.2    10,050.9    3.5 

Effect of yen interest rate

   60.4     

Effect of dollar interest rate

   245.1     

Effect of euro interest rate

   17.3     

Notes:

(1)In the above results of calculations of losses, a part of demand deposits without fixed intervals for amending applicable interest rates is deemed core deposits and is treated accordingly in the calculation.
(2)For the interest rate shock scenario used in connection with the above figures, we generate annual rate fluctuation data for five years derived from daily raw historical interest rate data of the past six years and then apply the actual fluctuation data, which show a rise in interest rates, at a 99.0% confidence level to the shock scenario.

Market Risk Equivalent

In order to calculate the amount of capital necessary to meet the capital requirements relating to market risk (the “market risk equivalent”), we apply internal models to calculate general market risk (risks related to factors that apply generally to the market, e.g., interest rates, foreign exchange rates) and the standardized measurement

method to calculate specific risks (risks other than general market risk, e.g., credit quality and market liquidity of an individual security or instrument). In addition, our internal models are applied to trading transactions with market liquidity based on the relevant holding period.

Under the internal models, the market risk equivalent is expressed as the sum of:

The higher of (i) VaR on the calculation date and (ii) the average of VaR for the preceding 60 business days (including the calculation date) multiplied by a multiplication factor ranging from 3.00 to 4.00 that is determined based on the number of times VaR is exceeded upon back testing; and

The higher of (i) stressed VaR on the calculation date and (ii) the average of stressed VaR for the preceding 60 business days (including the calculation date) multiplied by the same multiplication factor as used in the bullet point above.

The following table shows total market risk equivalent as of the dates indicated calculated using the standardized measurement method and internal models:

   As of March 31,     
           2016                   2017                   Change         
   (in billions of yen) 

Calculated using standardized measurement method

  ¥70.6   ¥103.6   ¥32.9 

Calculated using internal models

   65.0    78.9    13.9 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total market risk equivalent

  ¥135.6   ¥182.6   ¥46.9 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Note:

VaR and stressed VaR used to calculate market risk equivalent is based on the following:

VaR

historical simulation method;

confidence interval:one-tailed 99.0%;

holding period of 10 days; and

historical observation period of three years.

Stressed VaR

historical simulation method;

confidence interval:one-tailed 99.0%;

holding period of 10 days; and

historical observation period of one year.

Liquidity Risk Management Structure

Liquidity Risk Management of the Mizuho Group

Our Board of Directors determines basic matters pertaining to liquidity risk management policies. The Risk Management Committee of Mizuho Financial Group broadly discusses and coordinates matters relating to basic

policies in connection with liquidity risk management, operations, monitoring and proposes responses to emergencies such as sudden market changes.

The Group Chief Risk Officer of Mizuho Financial Group is responsible for matters relating to liquidity risk management planning and operations. The Risk Management Department of Mizuho Financial Group is responsible for monitoring liquidity risk, reportsreporting and analyses,analysing, making proposals, and formulating and implementing plans relating to liquidity risk management.

In addition, the Group Chief Financial Officer of Mizuho Financial Group is additionally responsible for matters relating to planning and running cash flow management operations, and the Financial Planning Department is responsible for monitoring and adjusting the cash flow management situation and for planning and implementing cash flow management to maintain appropriate funding liquidity. Reports on the liquidity risk management are submitted to the Risk Management Committee and the Balance Sheet Management Committee (each of which is a Business Policy Committee), the Executive Management Committee and the President & Group CEO on a regular basis.

ToOur principal banking subsidiaries and other core group companies also establish their basic policies on liquidity risk management to properly identify and manage liquidity risk.

Liquidity Risk Management Method

We manage liquidity risk wewith the use indices pertaining to cash flow, such asof “Liquidity Risk Management Indicators” and “Liquidity Categorization.” The former is determined for the purpose of managing limits on funds raised in the market thatconsidering our fund raising capabilities, and the latter is determined based on our funding conditions. We also carry out liquidity stress testing to verify the sufficiency of liquidity reserve assets and the effectiveness of countermeasures against a possible outflow of funds during a stress event. The results of stress testing are used for cash flow management operations.

Liquidity Risk Management Indicators

Limits on funds raised in the market are set based on a number of time horizons. Limits on liquidity risk set for yen and foreign currencieshorizons taking into account characteristics and strategies of each of our principal banking subsidiary,subsidiaries and other core group companies. Such limits are discussed and coordinated by the Risk Management Committee, discussed further by the Executive Management Committee and determined by the President & Group CEO. In addition, our principal banking subsidiaries setAn excess over any of these limits on liquidity risk for several currencies. Moreover, they are working on measuresis immediately reported and addressed according to reduce their liquidity risk such as enhancing management related to local currencies.apre-determined procedure.

Liquidity Categorization

We have established a group-wide framework of liquidity risk stagestages such as “Normal,” “Anxious” and “Crisis,” which reflects funding conditions. In addition, we set Early Warning Indicators (“EWIs”) and monitor on a daily basis to manage liquidityfunding conditions. As EWIs, we select stock prices, credit ratings, amount of liquidity reserve assets such as Japanese government bonds, our funding situations and so on.others.

Liquidity Stress Testing

We have establishedcarry out stress testing regularly based on market-wide factors, idiosyncratic factors of the group and a liquidity contingency funding plan for emergency situations which are deemedcombination of both types of factors to fall into the “Anxious” or “Crisis.” In emergency situations, we will consider measures such as a reduction in the amount of investments made, an expansion of funding from financial markets and deposits, the sale of investment securities and borrowings from the central bank.

In order to evaluateverify the sufficiency of liquidity reserve assets and the effectiveness of our liquidity contingency funding plan, we conduct stress testing under market-wide, idiosyncratic and combined scenario.plans. Furthermore, we utilize stress testing for evaluating the appropriateness of our annual funding plan.

Liquidity Risk Management at Our Principal Banking Subsidiaries and Other Core Group Companies

Our principal banking subsidiaries and other core group companies have formulated their basic policies in line with the basic policies determined by Mizuho Financial Group. Their Boards of Directors determine important matters relating to liquidity risk management while their Chief Executive Officers are responsible for controlling liquidity risk. Their respective business policy committees, including their Balance Sheet & Risk Management Committees, are responsible for overall discussion and coordination of liquidity risk management. Specifically, these committees discuss and coordinate matters relating to risk planning, cash flow management planning and propose responses to emergencies such as sudden market changes. The Chief Risk Officer is responsible for matters relating to liquidity risk management planning and operations and the senior executives of the asset and liability management and trading units are responsible for matters pertaining to planning and conducting cash flow management.

The methodologies used for ensuring precise control of liquidity risk include the formulation of management indices pertaining to cash flow, such as limits on funds raised in the market that are set based on a number of time horizons. As with Mizuho Financial Group, the above-mentioned companies have established liquidity risk stage, such as “Normal,” “Anxious” and “Crisis,” which reflects funding conditions and have established liquidity contingency funding plan for emergency situations which are deemed to fall into the “Anxious” or “Crisis” categories.

Each subsidiary has adopted stringent controls that call for the submission of reports on liquidity risk management and cash flow management to their respective business policy committees, including their Balance Sheet & Risk Management Committees, the Executive Management Committee and the Chief Executive Officer of each subsidiary.

Operational Risk Management

We define operational risk as the risk of loss that we may incur resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems or from external events. We recognizecontrol operational risk management for the Mizuho group as a whole. Considering that operational risk includes information technology risk, operations risk, legal risk, human resources risk, tangible asset risk, regulatory change risk and reputational risk. Werisk, we have separately

determined the fundamental risk management policies for each kindthese different types of risk. We manage the operational risk associated with our principal banking subsidiaries and other core group companies while monitoring the state of group-wide operational risk.

Operational Risk Management Structure

Our Board of Directors determines basic matters pertaining to operational risk management policies. The Risk Management Committee of Mizuho Bank,Financial Group broadly discusses and coordinates matters relating to basic policies in connection with operational risk management, operational risk operations and operational risk monitoring. The Group Chief Risk Officer of Mizuho Trust & Banking,Financial Group is responsible for matters relating to operational risk management planning and operations. The Risk Management Department of Mizuho Securities, Trust & Custody Services Bank, Mizuho Americas, etc., respectivelyFinancial Group is responsible for monitoring market risk, reporting and analysing, making proposals, setting limits and guidelines, and formulating and implementing plans relating to operational risk management.

Our principal banking subsidiaries and core group companies establish their basic policies on operational risk management, and their Boards of Directors determine important matters relating to operational risk management.

Operational Risk Management Method

To manage operational risk, in an appropriate manner pursuant to risk management policies determined by Mizuho Financial Group.

Mizuho Financial Group, Mizuho Bank, Mizuho Trust & Banking, Mizuho Securities, Trust & Custody Services Bank, etc., sharewe set common rules for data gathering to develop various databases shared by the group and we measure operational risk as operational VAR on a regular basis, taking into account possible future loss events and the changes in the business environment and internal management.

We have established and are strengthening management methods and systems to appropriately identify, assess, measure, monitor and control the operational risks whichthat arise from the growing sophistication and diversification of financial operations and developments relating to information technology by utilizing control self-assessments and improving measurement methods.

Definition of Risks and Risk Management Methods

As shown in the table below, we have defined each component of operational risk, and we apply appropriate risk management methods in accordance with the scale and nature of each risk.

 

   

Definition

  

Principal Risk Management Methods

Information Technology Risk  Information technology risk (“IT risk”) shall refer to the risk that problems (e.g. malfunctions, disruptions, etc.) with the computer systems or improper use of the computers in these systems, which cause disruptions of the services provided to customers, or have significant impact on settlement systems, etc., will result in losses for customers, and the incurrence of losses (tangible or intangible) by our group companies.  

•  Identify and evaluate the risk by setting specific standards that need to be complied with and implementing measures tailored based on evaluation results to reduce the risk.

•  Ensure ongoing project management in systems development and quality control.

•  Strengthen security to prevent information leaks.

•  Strengthen capabilities for rapidly and effectively dealing with cyberattacks.

•  Improve effectiveness of emergency responses by improving backup systems and holding drills.

Operations Risk  Risk that customers may suffer service disruptions, as well as the risk that customers or the group may incur losses because senior executives or employees fail to fulfill their tasks properly, cause accidents or otherwise act improperly.  

•  Establish clearly defined procedures for handling operations.

•  Periodically check the status of operational processes.

•  Conduct training and development programs by headquarters.

Definition

Principal Risk Management Methods

•  Introduce information technology, office automation and centralization for operations.

•  Improve the effectiveness of emergency responses by holding drills.

Definition

Principal Risk Management Methods

Legal Risk  Risk that the group may incur losses due to violation of laws and regulations, breach of contract, entering into improper contracts or other legal factors.  

•  Review and confirm legal issues, including the legality of material decisions, agreements and external documents, etc.

•  Collect and distribute legal information and conduct internal training programs.

•  Analyze and manage issues related to lawsuits.

Human Resources Risk  Risk that the group may incur losses due to drain or loss of personnel, deterioration of morale, inadequate development of human resources, inappropriate working schedule, inappropriate working and safety environment, inequality or inequity in human resource management or discriminatory conduct.  

•  Conduct employee satisfaction surveys.

•  Understand the status of working hours.

•  Understand the status of vacation days taken by personnel.

•  Understand the status of voluntary resignations.

•  Understand the status of the stress check system.

Tangible Asset Risk  Risk that the group may incur losses from damage to tangible assets or a decline in the quality of working environment as a result of disasters, criminal actions or defects in asset maintenance.  

•  Manage the planning and implementation of construction projects related to the repair and replacement of facilities.

•  Identify and evaluate the status of damage to tangible assets caused by natural disasters, etc., and respond appropriately to such damage.

Regulatory Change Risk  Risk that the group may incur losses due to changes in various regulations or systems, such as those related to law, taxation and accounting.  

•  Understand important changes in regulations or systems that have significant influence on our business operations or financial condition in a timely and accurate manner.

•  Analyze degree of influence of regulatory changes and establish countermeasures.

•  Continuously monitor our regulatory change risk management mentioned above.

Reputational

Risk

  Risk that the group may incur losses due to damage to our credibility or the value of the “Mizuho” brand when market participants or others learn about, or the media reports on, various adverse events, including actual materialization of risks or false rumors.  

•  Establish framework to identify and manage, on an integrated basis, information that may have a serious impact on group management and respond to such risk in a manner appropriate to its scale and nature.

•  Swiftly identify rumors and devise appropriate responses depending on the urgency and possible impact of the situation to minimize possible losses.

We also recognize and manage “Information Security Risk” and “Compliance Risk,” which constitute a combination of more than one of the above components of operational risk, as operational risk.

Measurement of operational risk equivalent

Implementation of the AMAAMA/Advanced Measurement Approach (“AMA”)

We have adopted the AMA from September 30, 2009, for the calculation of operational risk equivalent in association with capital adequacy ratios based on Basel II.Regulation. However, we use the Basic Indicator Approach for entities that are deemed to be less important in the measurement of operational risk equivalent and for entities that are preparing to implement the AMA. equivalent.

The measurement results under the AMA are used not only as the operational risk equivalent in the calculation of capital adequacy ratios based on Basel Regulation, but also as Operationaloperational VAR for internal risk management purposes for implementing action plans to reduce operational risk, etc.

Outline of the AMA

 

Outline of measurement system

We have established the model by taking account of four elements: internal loss data; external loss data; scenario analysis and business environment; and internal control factors (BEICFs). We calculate the operational risk equivalent amount by estimating the maximum loss, using a 99.9th percentileone-tailed confidence interval and aone-year holding period, etc., as operational risk equivalent, employing both internal loss data (i.e., actually experienced operational loss events) and scenario data to reflect unexperienced potential future loss events in the measurement.

In the measurement of operational risk equivalent as of March 31, 2017,2019, we did not exclude expected losses and also did not recognize the risk mitigating impact of insurance. In addition, we did not take into account the events related to credit risk in measuring operational risk equivalent.

 

Outline of measurement model

Operational risk equivalent is calculated as a simple sum of those risk amounts related to the seven loss event types defined by Basel II,in the FSA’s Capital Adequacy Notice, large-scale natural disasters and litigation. In the measurement of operational risk equivalent as of March 31, 2017,2019, we did not reflect the correlation effects among operational risk related to each of the seven loss event types.

 

Operational risk by the loss event type

Loss Distribution (Compound Poisson Distribution) Approach (LDA) is adopted for the calculation of operational risk. LDA is based on the assumption that Poisson Distribution applies to the occurrence frequency of operational risk events, and loss severity is expressed through a separate distribution. Operational risk is calculated for each of the seven loss event types employing both internal loss data, based on our actual experience as operational loss events and scenario data. Scenario data, expressed as numerical values of occurrence frequency and loss severity, reflects external loss data and BEICFs, in order to estimate unexperienced potential future loss events (of low frequency and high severity).

“Frequency Distribution” and “Severity Distribution” are estimated employing the above mentioned internal loss data and scenario data, and Monte-Carlo simulations are then applied to these distributions to measure operational risk. The detailed steps of creation of scenario data are explained later in “Scenario Analysis.”

 

Estimation of “Frequency Distribution” and “Loss Severity Distribution”

“Frequency Distribution” is estimated by applying information on occurrence frequency of both internal loss data and scenario data to Poisson Distribution. “Loss Severity Distribution” is generated as the result of combining, through a statistical approach (Extreme Value Theory), of the actual distribution for the low severity distribution portion created by internal loss data and another loss distribution(Log-normal Distribution or Generalized Pareto Distribution) for the high severity distribution portion created by scenario data.

Operational risk of large-scale natural disasters

Monte-Carlo simulation is applied to the datasets expressed as a combination of the probability of occurrence of large-scale natural disasters and the probable loss amount in case of such occurrence, as opposed to estimating “Frequency Distribution” and “Loss Severity Distribution.”

 

Operational risk of litigation

Each litigation is converted into data according to the profile of the individual litigation to which Monte-Carlo simulation is applied, as opposed to estimating “Frequency Distribution” and “Loss Severity Distribution.” In the measurement process, we assume that final decisions will be made on all litigation within one year.

 

Verification

We confirm the appropriateness of the measurement model by verifying it, in principle, semi-annually.

Scenario Analysis

 

Outline of scenario analysis

In the process of scenario analysis, scenario data is created as numerical values of occurrence frequency and loss severity reflecting external loss data and BEICFs, in order to estimate unexperienced potential future operational risk events (of low frequency and high severity).

As for external loss data, we refer to data publicly reported by domestic and overseas media, and such data are reflected in the estimation of occurrence frequency and loss severity distribution in the process of scenario analysis. In addition, BEICFs are utilized as indices to adjust occurrence frequency and loss severity distribution in the process of scenario analysis.

We categorize scenario analysis into four approaches in accordance with the characteristics of each loss event type and risk management structures.

 

Approach

  

Loss event type(s) to be applied

A

  Internal fraud / External fraud / Clients, products and business practices / Execution, delivery and process management

B

  Employment practices and workplace safety

C

  Damage to physical assets

D

  Business disruption and system failure

At Mizuho Financial Group, loss event types to which Approach A is applied account for a considerable amount of operational risk. The detailed process of Approach A is explained below as a typical example of scenario analysis.

 

Setting units for scenario analysis

In order to ensure completeness and sufficiency, we set units that are commonly applied across group entities that adopt AMA (the “Group Entities”) by referencing and categorizing risk scenarios recognized through control self-assessment, internal loss data of the Group Entities and external loss data, etc. Then each of the Group Entities selects the unit on which scenario analysis is conducted from the units established on a groupwidegroup-wide basis in accordance with its business activities and operational risk profile.

 

Estimation of occurrence frequency

Basic occurrence frequency (once a year) is calculated for each scenario analysis unit. If a certain scenario analysis unit has relevant internal loss data of apre-determined threshold amount or above, its basic occurrence frequency is calculated based on such data, and if not, the basic occurrence frequency

(the (the occurrence frequency per year of losses at or above apre-determined threshold) is calculated with reference to the situation of occurrence of internal loss data of less than the threshold amount and/or external loss data. The basic occurrence frequency is then adjusted within apre-determined range for the purpose of reflecting the most recent BEICFs to determine the final occurrence frequency.

Estimation of loss severity distribution

In order to estimate loss severity distribution, we use apre-determined series of severity ranges. Basic loss severity distribution is calculated for each scenario analysis unit as an occurrence ratio (in percentile figures) of loss at each severity range when losses at or above apre-determined threshold occurred, with reference to transaction amount data, external loss data, etc. Then the basic severity distribution is adjusted, if necessary, from the viewpoint of statistical data processing to determine the final loss severity distribution.

 

Creation of scenario data

For each scenario analysis unit, scenario data is generated as a series of combinations of occurrence frequency per year at each severity range, based on the final occurrence frequency and the final loss severity distribution.

Compliance

As thea leading Japanese financial services group with a global presence and a broad customer base, we remain conscious of the importance of our social responsibilities and public mission at all times. We define compliance as “the strict observance of all laws and regulations and the pursuit of fair and honest corporate activities that conform to the norms accepted by society” and view ongoing compliance as one of the basic principles of sound business management. Each of our group companies maintains its own compliance structure in line with the basic policies established by Mizuho Financial Group.

Compliance Structure

The chief executive officer of Mizuho Financial Group, Mizuho Bank, Mizuho Trust & Banking and Mizuho Securities each generally oversees compliance matters of their respective companies, and the chief executive officer, etc., also head their respective compliance committees at which important matters concerning compliance are discussed. The four companies also have individual compliance divisions under thetheir respective chief compliance officer.officers. These divisions are responsible for compliance planning and implementation and control overall compliance management at thetheir respective companies. At the level of each organizational unit (such as branches and divisions) at the four companies, the head of the unit is responsible for guidance and implementation related to compliance matters within such unit, and the compliance officer or the compliance administrator at each unit reviews the status of compliance.

Other core group companies have also established compliance structures adapted to the characteristics of their respective businesses.

Mizuho Financial Group monitors the status of compliance of the Mizuho group through reports submitted by our principal banking subsidiaries and other core group companies and adopts appropriate responses when necessary.

Compliance at subsidiaries of our principal banking subsidiaries and other core group companies is monitored and managed by their respective parents.

Compliance Activities

We have established the “Mizuho Code of Conduct,” which sets forth clear and concrete standards of ethical behavior, and distributed it to all directors, senior management and employees of the Mizuho group so that they are well aware of its content and act accordingly.

Each of our group companies has also prepared a compliance manual, which serves as a practical guidebook for rigorous compliance enforcement and clarifies the laws and regulations that the group companies must observe in pursuing their business activities and the compliance activities they are required to follow.

We conduct compliance training for directors, senior management and employees so that they are fully acquainted with the contents of the manual.

We monitor the status of compliance levels through self assessments conducted by individual organizational units and monitoring conducted by the compliance division of each company.

Every fiscal year, each of our group companies establishes a compliance program, which contains concrete measures for compliance enforcement such as measures related to the management of the compliance framework, training and assessments. Progress regarding the implementation of the compliance program is monitored every six months.

Internal Audit

Internal audits are designed as an integrated process, independentaudit refers to the series of activities, ranging from other business operations, for evaluating the extent to which internal control achieves its objectives in key areas, including appropriate risk management, efficient and effective business operations, reliable financial reporting and compliance with laws, regulations and internal rules. We conduct internal audits from an objective and comprehensive evaluation of the effectiveness and appropriateness of each process relating to governance, risk management and control, to provide recommendations, corrective guidance, etc., toward the resolution of problems from an independent standpoint independent of operational reporting lines,the departments and offer advice and remedial recommendations in connection with any problemsbusiness processes that may be identified.are subject to the audit, based on a plan approved by the board of directors of each of our group companies. Through this process,these series of activities, internal audits assist the boards of directors of each of our group companies to fulfill their managerial duties efficiently and effectively.

In line with the Basic Policy for Internal Audit established by Mizuho Financial Group, our principal banking subsidiaries and other core group companies conduct internal audits, which include the internal auditing of their respective subsidiaries. In addition, with respect to the management of risks applicable across the Mizuho group, we coordinate internal audits throughout the group to assess the risk management status of the group as a whole.

Internal Audit Management Structure

Mizuho Financial Group

Our internal audit committeeInternal Audit Committee determines all important matters concerning internal audits. The committee is chaired by our President & Group CEO and is independent of our other business operations.

The Head of the Internal Audit Group reports the progress of individual audits and plans to the Audit Committee, responds to requests for inspections, and receives specific instructions from the committee. Our internal audit committeeInternal Audit Committee monitors and manages internal audits at our principal banking subsidiaries and other core group companies through internal audit reports submitted by such subsidiaries. Our internal audit committeeInternal Audit Committee discusses and makes decisions regarding internal audits at our principal banking subsidiaries and other core group companies and submits the results, together with the results of their examination of the internal audit reports, to the Audit Committee and our Board of Directors.

Mizuho Bank and Mizuho Trust & Banking

Mizuho Bank and Mizuho Trust & Banking have also established internal audit committees that are independent of their other business operations.operations and a framework under which their internal audit committees coordinate with their respective audit & supervisory committees.

Both banks have established internal audit departments and credit review departments (Credit Assessment and Auditing Office at Mizuho Trust & Banking) to conduct internal audits at their respective domestic and overseas business offices, head office departments and group companies. Specifically, the internal audit departments assess the suitability and effectiveness of business activities associated with compliance and risk management. The credit review departments (Credit Assessment and Auditing Office at Mizuho Trust & Banking) audit credit ratings and the status of credit management in addition to auditing the self-assessment of assets to verify the accuracy and suitability of matters deemed necessary to assure the soundness of assets.

Other Core Group Companies

Other core group companies have also established effective and efficient internal audit structures adapted to the characteristics of their respective businesses.

ITEM 12.

DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES

12.A. Debt Securities

Not applicable.

12.B. Warrants and Rights

Not applicable.

12.C. Other Securities

Not applicable.

12.D. American Depositary Shares

The depositary collects its fees for delivery and surrender of ADSs directly from investors depositing shares or surrendering ADSs for the purpose of withdrawal or from intermediaries acting for them. The table below sets out such fees payable to the depositary:

 

Persons depositing or withdrawing shares must pay:

  

For:

$5.00 (or less) per 100 ADSs (or portion of 100 ADSs)

  Execution and deliveryDelivery of ADRs and the surrender of ADRs

$.02.05 (or less) per ADS(1)

  – Any cash distribution to ADS registered holders

A fee equivalent to the fee that would be payable if securities distributed to you had been shares and the shares had been deposited for issuance of ADSs

  – Distribution of securities distributed to holders of deposited securities that are distributed by the depositary to ADS registered holders

$.05 (or less) per ADS(2)

– General depositary services

Registration or transfer fees

  – Transfer and registration of shares on our share register to or from the name of the depositary or its agent when you deposit or withdraw shares

Expenses of the depositary

  

– Cable, telex and facsimile transmissions expenses
(as are expressly provided in the deposit agreement)

– Converting foreign currency to U.S. dollars

Taxes and other governmental charges

  – As necessary

Any other charge incurred by the depositary or its agents in connection with the servicing of the deposited securities

  – As necessary

Notes:

(1)

Based on the amendments to the Deposit Agreement that became effective April 2, 2018, fees for any cash distribution to ADS registered holders were changed from $.02 (or less) per ADS to $.05 (or less) per ADS.

(2)

Based on the amendments to the Deposit Agreement that became effective April 2, 2018, fees for general depositary services were newly added.

The Bank of New York Mellon (“BNYM”), as depositary, has agreed to reimburse us annually for expenses related to the administration and maintenance of the depositary receipt facility including, but not limited to, investor relations expenses, legal fees, New York Stock Exchange continue listing fees or any other direct ornon-direct depositary receipt program related expenses. There are limits on the amount of expenses for which the depositary will reimburse us, and the terms and conditions of the annual reimbursement are subject to be reviewed by us and BNYM on an annual basis.us. In the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017,2019, the depositary reimbursed us $75,000$500,000 for such expenses.

PART II

 

ITEM 13.

DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES

None.

 

ITEM 14.

MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None.

 

ITEM 15.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of March 31, 2017.2019. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable, not absolute, assurance of achieving their control objectives. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Based upon the evaluation referred to above, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 20172019 were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rule13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with applicable generally accepted accounting principles. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

 

 (i)

pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;

 

 (ii)

provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors; and

 

 (iii)

provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Our management evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 20172019 based on the criteria established in “Internal Control—Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of

Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (COSO). Based on the evaluation, management has concluded that we maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2017.2019.

Our independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young ShinNihon LLC has issued an attestation report on our internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2017,2019, which appears on pageF-3.

Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm

See the attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young ShinNihon LLC, which appears on pageF-3.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

During the period covered by this annual report, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or that are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting other than noted below.

Since June 11, 2018, Mizuho Bank and Mizuho Trust & Banking have been engaging in a multi-stage process of migration to, and the implementation of, our next-generation IT systems, including accounting system. As of July 5, 2019, we have completed eight out of the nine required phases. This implementation contains changes to processes that constitute a part of our internal control over financial reporting.

 

ITEM 16A.

AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT

Our board of directors has determined that Messrs. Tetsuo Seki, Hirotake Abe, Hisaaki Hirama and Nobukatsu FunakiMasahiro Kosugi each qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in Item 16A of Form20-F under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. In addition, all threeMessrs. Tetsuo Seki and Hirotake Abe are determined to be independent as defined under the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) Corporate Governance Standards.

 

ITEM 16B.

CODE OF ETHICS

Mizuho Financial Group has adopted a code of ethics, titled “Code of Ethics for Financial Professionals,” which is applicable to all directors and executive officers, as well as all managers and other employees of the companyMizuho Financial Group who engage in financial reporting, accounting or disclosure. The code of ethics of Mizuho Financial Group is included in this annual report as Exhibit 11.

 

ITEM 16C.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Fees for Services Providedprovided by Ernst & Young ShinNihon LLC

The aggregate fees billed by Ernst & Young ShinNihon LLC, our independent registered public accounting firm, and its affiliates, for the fiscal years ended March 31, 20162018 and 20172019 are presented in the following table:

 

  Fiscal years ended March 31,   Fiscal years ended March 31, 
  2016   2017           2018                   2019         
  (in millions of yen)   (in millions of yen) 

Audit fees(1)

  ¥4,608   ¥4,800   ¥4,951   ¥5,253 

Audit-related fees(2)

   485    406    306    273 

Tax fees(3)

   131    117    213    102 

All other fees(4)

   1    42    13    4 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

  ¥5,225   ¥5,365   ¥5,483   ¥5,632 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

Notes:

 

(1)

Audit fees include primarily fees related to the audit of U.S. GAAP financial statements as well as Japanese GAAP financial statements used for home-country reporting purposes.

(2)

Audit-related fees include fees for services relating to agreed-upon procedures on internal controls and due diligence services related to our securitization business and services related to the implementation of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.business.

(3)

Tax fees include fees for services relating to the preparation of tax returns and tax advice.

(4)

All other fees include fees for services relating to education to improve the financial business knowledge of our employees.

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

We established thepre-approval policies and procedures required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act on April 1, 2006. Under the procedures, Mizuho Financial Group and its subsidiaries must apply to our audit committee members forpre-approval before entering into an agreement regarding audit and permittednon-audit services with Ernst & Young ShinNihon LLC.

We follow two types ofpre-approval policies and procedures:

 

Generalpre-approval

  Generalpre-approval is required for services which are expected to be performed during a given fiscal year. Our audit committee reviews the specific maximum fee amount for new services and the maximum amount of increase/decrease from previous fee amounts for the same type of services as those performed in the past and authorizespre-approval at the beginning of each fiscal year.

Specificpre-approval

  For those services which have not been approved pursuant to the generalpre-approval procedure, specificpre-approval by our audit committee members is required prior to each engagement. With respect to such services, two full-time audit committee members must providepre-approval and report suchpre-approval at the monthly meeting of the audit committee.

 

ITEM 16D.

EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES

Not applicable

ITEM 16E.

PURCHASE OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS

The following table sets forth purchases of our common stock by us and our affiliated purchasers during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017:2019:

 

   Total number of
shares purchased
   Average price
paid per share
   Total number of
shares purchased
as part of publicly
announced plans
or programs
   Maximum
number of shares
that may yet be
purchased under
the plans
or programs
 

April 1 to April 30, 2016

   1,422   ¥161.1         

May 1 to May 31, 2016

   1,033    169.0         

June 1 to June 30, 2016

   3,045    162.4         

July 1 to July 31, 2016

   3,304    155.6         

August 1 to August 31, 2016

   2,131    165.3         

September 1 to September 30, 2016

   1,358    176.8         

October 1 to October 31, 2016

   1,518    169.7         

November 1 to November 30, 2016

   3,125    181.2         

December 1 to December 31, 2016

   7,648    218.2         

January 1 to January 31, 2017

   3,516    212.7         

February 1 to February 28, 2017

   3,306    211.0         

March 1 to March 31, 2017

   3,412    211.4         
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   34,818   ¥191.4         
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   Total number of
shares purchased
   Average price
paid per share
   Total number of
shares purchased
as part of publicly
announced plans
or programs
   Maximum
number of shares
that may yet be
purchased under
the plans
or programs
 

April 1 to April 30, 2018

   2,336   ¥193.5         

May 1 to May 31, 2018

   2,764    199.2         

June 1 to June 30, 2018

   7,160    191.7         

July 1 to July 31, 2018

   6,815    188.9         

August 1 to August 31, 2018

   3,761    195.2         

September 1 to September 30, 2018

   2,662    194.8         

October 1 to October 31, 2018

   2,904    195.3         

November 1 to November 30, 2018

   2,533    192.2         

December 1 to December 31, 2018

   4,601    179.8         

January 1 to January 31, 2019

   4,855    172.4         

February 1 to February 28, 2019

   75,934    174.1         

March 1 to March 31, 2019

   37,543    174.1         
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   153,868   ¥178.0         
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

Note:

 

(1)

A total of 34,818153,868 shares were purchased other than through a publicly announced planplans or programprograms during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017,2019, due to our purchase of shares constituting less than one (1) unit from registered holders of shares constituting less than one (1) unit at the current market price of those shares.

 

ITEM 16F.

CHANGE IN REGISTRANT’S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT

None.

 

ITEM 16G.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Mizuho Financial Group’s corporate governance practices are governed by applicable Japanese laws, specifically the Companies Act and Financial Instruments and Exchange Act of Japan, and its articles of incorporation and corporate governance guidelines. The company transformed itself from a Company with Audit & Supervisory Board to a Company with Three Committees as of June 24, 2014.

Because Mizuho Financial Group’s shares are registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and are listed on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”), the company is also subject to corporate governance requirements applicable to NYSE-listed foreign private issuers. NYSE-listed companies that are foreign private issuers meeting certain criteria are permitted to follow home country practices in lieu of certain provisions of Section 303A, and Mizuho Financial Group is relying on this exemption.

A NYSE-listed foreign private issuer is required to provide to its U.S. investors a brief, general summary of the significant differences of corporate governance practices that differ from those followed by NYSE-listed U.S.

companies. The following is a summary of the significant ways in which Mizuho Financial Group’s corporate governance practices differ from NYSE listing standards followed by U.S. companies:

 

A NYSE-listed U.S. company is required to have a majority of directors that meet the independence requirements under Section 303A of the NYSE’s Listed Company Manual. The Companies Act does not require Mizuho Financial Group to have a majority of “independent” directors on the board; rather, it requires the company to have a majority of “outside” directors on each of the Nominating Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Audit Committee, each established as a committee, pursuant to the requirements that apply to a Company with Three Committees. An outside director is defined under the Companies Act as a director who meets all of the following requirements: (a) a person who is not currently, and has not been in the ten years prior to his or her assumption of office as outside director, an executive director, an executive officer, a manager, or any other type of employee (“Executive Director, etc.”) of the company or its subsidiaries; (b) if a person has been anon-executive director, an audit & supervisory board member, or an accounting adviser of the company or its subsidiaries within the ten years prior to his or her assumption of office as outside director, a person who was not an Executive Director, etc., of the company or its subsidiaries in the ten years prior to his or her assumption of office as such; (c) a person who is not (i) a person who controls the company (including the company’s parent company) (“Parent Company, etc.”) and who is a natural person or (ii) a director, an executive officer, a manager or any other type of employee of a Parent Company, etc.; (d) a person who is not an Executive Director, etc., of another subsidiary of a Parent Company, etc.; and (e) a person who is not a spouse or a family member within the second degree of kinship of (i) a director, an executive officer, a manager, or any other type of important employee of the company or (ii) a Parent Company, etc., who is a natural person. In addition to the requirements under the Companies Act, Mizuho Financial Group’s independence standards for outside directors set forth additional independence requirements on a voluntary basis. Such additional requirements include, but are not limited to, restrictions against persons that are related to a principal business counterparty of Mizuho Financial Group and its Three Core Companies, entities to which Mizuho Financial Group and its Three Core Companies are a principal business counterparty, entities that receive more than a specified amount of donations from Mizuho Financial Group or its Three Core Companies, entities to which directors have been transferred from us, our accounting auditor, law firms and consulting firms that receive more than a specified amount of fees from Mizuho Financial Group or its Three Core Companies, as well as persons who otherwise are likely to give rise to consistent substantive conflicts of interest in relation to general shareholders. Mizuho Financial Group may, however, appoint a person as an outside director who does not satisfy the additional independence requirements but who it believes to be suitable for the position with sufficient independence in consideration of such person’s character and insight, provided that it externally provides an explanation as to the reason it believes such person qualifies as an outside director with sufficient independence.

require Mizuho Financial Group to have a majority of “independent” directors on the board; rather, it requires the company to have a majority of “outside” directors on each of the Nominating Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Audit Committee, each established as a committee, pursuant to the requirements that apply to a Company with Three Committees. An outside director is defined under the Companies Act as a director who meets all of the following requirements: (a) a person who is not currently, and has not been in the ten years prior to his or her assumption of office as outside director, an executive director, an executive officer, a manager, or any other type of employee (“Executive Director, etc.”) of the company or its subsidiaries; (b) if a person has been anon-executive director, an audit & supervisory board member, or an accounting adviser of the company or its subsidiaries within the ten years prior to his or her assumption of office as outside director, a person who was not an Executive Director, etc., of the company or its subsidiaries in the ten years prior to his or her assumption of office as such; (c) a person who is not (i) a person who controls the company (including the company’s parent company) (“Parent Company, etc.”) and who is a natural person or (ii) a director, an executive officer, a manager or any other type of employee of a Parent Company, etc.; (d) a person who is not an Executive Director, etc., of another subsidiary of a Parent Company, etc.; and (e) a person who is not a spouse or a family member within the second degree of kinship of (i) a director, an executive officer, a manager, or any other type of important employee of the company or (ii) a Parent Company, etc., who is a natural person. In addition to the requirements under the Companies Act, Mizuho Financial Group’s independence standards for outside directors set forth additional independence requirements on a voluntary basis. Such additional requirements include, but are not limited to, restrictions against persons that are related to a principal business counterparty of Mizuho Financial Group and its Core Subsidiaries, entities to which Mizuho Financial Group and its Core Subsidiaries are a principal business counterparty, entities that receive more than a specified amount of donations from Mizuho Financial Group or its Core Subsidiaries, entities to which directors have been transferred from us, our accounting auditor, law firms and consulting firms that receive more than a specified amount of fees from Mizuho Financial Group or its Core Subsidiaries, as well as persons who otherwise are likely to give rise to consistent substantive conflicts of interest in relation to general shareholders. Mizuho Financial Group may, however, appoint a person as an outside director who does not satisfy the additional independence requirements but who it believes to be suitable for the position with sufficient independence in consideration of such person’s character and insight, provided that it externally provides an explanation as to the reason it believes such person qualifies as an outside director with sufficient independence.

Currently, Mizuho Financial Group has six outside directors among the thirteenfourteen directors.

 

A NYSE-listed U.S. company is required to have an audit committee composed entirely of independent directors. Currently, among the five members of the Audit Committee, three members including the Chairman are outside directors and two members are internalnon-executive directors in compliance with the requirements under the Companies Act, and all such committee members are independent under Rule10A-3 under the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934 with threefour members qualified as audit committee financial experts.

 

A NYSE-listed U.S. company is required to have a nominating/corporate governance committee and a compensation committee, both of which must be composed entirely of independent directors. Currently, the Nominating Committee and the Compensation Committee consist solely of outside directors in compliance with the requirements under the Companies Act.

 

A NYSE-listed U.S. company must hold regularly scheduled executive sessions where participants are limited tonon-executive directors. Under the Companies Act, Japanese corporations are not obligated to hold executive sessions where participants are limited tonon-executive directors. Mizuho Financial Group has establishedCurrently, the Outside Director Session that consists solely of all outside directors and the President & CEO as a forum for free discussions with an aim to deepen outside directors’ understanding of our group and share the top management’s awareness of issues through communication among

 

directors. Among the Outside Director Session meetings,directors and is held at least one meeting is heldtwice a year, where onlythe outside directors attend to discuss among others,matters such as issues facing management, issues, operationsthe operation of the Board of Directors and the current state ofgovernance systems, and provide opinions as appropriate to the governance structure.Group CEO.

 

A NYSE-listed U.S. company must adopt corporate governance guidelines and a code of business conduct and ethics and must post those on its website. While Mizuho Financial Group is not required to adopt such guidelines and code under applicable Japanese laws or the rules of the stock exchange in Japan on which it is listed, the company established in June 2014 and has been updating its corporate governance guidelines that sets forth the basic policy, framework and governing policies regarding the corporate governance system in Mizuho Financial Group and also maintains the “Mizuho Code of Conduct” as its standard for corporate conduct to be observed by the directors, officers and employees.

 

ITEM 16H.

MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE

Not applicable.

PART III

 

ITEM 17.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

We have elected to provide the financial statements and related information specified in Item 18.

 

ITEM 18.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The information required by this item is set forth in our consolidated financial statements starting onpage F-1 of this annual report.

 

ITEM 19.

EXHIBITS

 

Exhibit

Number

  

Description of Exhibits

    1.1      Articles of Incorporation of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc., dated June 23, 2017 (English Translation)**
    1.2      Regulations of the Board of Directors of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc., as amended on April 1, 201726, 2019 (English Translation)
    1.3      Share Handling Regulations of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc., dated June 23, 2017April 1, 2018 (English Translation)*
    2.1      Form of American Depositary Receipt*
    2.2      Form of Deposit Agreement, amended and restated as of April 2, 2018, among the registrant, The Bank of New York Mellon (formerly The Bank of New York) as Depositary and all owners and holders from time to time of American Depositary Receipts issued thereunder*
8  List of significant subsidiaries of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.—see “Item 4.C. Information on the Company—Organizational Structure.”
11  Code of Ethics for Financial Professionals of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (English Translation)***
  12.1      CEO Certification required by Rule13a-14(a) (17 CFR240.13a-14(a)).
  12.2      CFO Certification required by Rule13a-14(a) (17 CFR240.13a-14(a)).
  13.1      Certification required by Rule13a-14(b) (17 CFR240.13a-14(b)) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350).
15  Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
101.INS  XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
101.CAL  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
101.DEF  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
101.LAB  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
101.PRE  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase

 

*

Incorporated by reference to our annual report on Form20-F (No.001-33098) filed on July 23, 2015.3, 2018.

**

Incorporated by reference to our annual report on Form20-F (No.001-33098) filed on July 7, 2017.

***

Incorporated by reference to our annual report on Form20-F (No.001-33098) filed on July 21, 2016.

SELECTED STATISTICAL DATA

In preparing the selected statistical data set forth below, foreign activities are defined as business transactions that involve customers residing outside of Japan. However, as the operations of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries (“the MHFG Group” or “the Group”) are highly and globally integrated, the MHFG Group has made certain estimates and assumptions in allocating assets, liabilities, income and expense between domestic and foreign operations. The Group considers domestic and foreign activities determined by such methods to be representative of the Group’s operations.

I. Distribution of assets, liabilities and equity; interest rates and interest differential

Average balances of balance sheet items, interest and dividend income, interest expense and average yields and rates

The following tables show the MHFG Group’s average balances of balance sheet items, Interest and dividend income, Interest expense, average yields on interest-earning assets, and average rates on interest-bearing liabilities for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2015, 20162017, 2018 and 2017.2019. Average balances are generally based on a daily average.Month-end orquarter-end averages are used for certain average balances where it is not practicable to obtain applicable daily averages. The average balances determined by such methods are considered to be representative of the MHFG Group’s operations.

 

 2015 2016 2017  2017 2018 2019 
 Average
balance
 Interest and
dividend
income
 Average
yield
 Average
balance
 Interest and
dividend
income
 Average
yield
 Average
balance
 Interest and
dividend
income
 Average
yield
  Average
balance
 Interest and
dividend
income
 Average
yield
 Average
balance
 Interest and
dividend
income
 Average
yield
 Average
balance
 Interest and
dividend
income
 Average
yield
 
 (in billions of yen, except percentages)  

 

(in billions of yen, except percentages)

 

Assets:

                  

Interest-earning assets:

                  

Interest-bearing deposits in other banks:

                  

Domestic

  15,900   20   0.12  29,485   30   0.10  37,389   27   0.07 37,389  27  0.07 39,812  27  0.07 38,914  26  0.07

Foreign

  5,689   29   0.51  6,639   38   0.57  7,671   48   0.63 7,671  48  0.63 8,363  94  1.13 5,951  95  1.59
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Total

  21,589   49   0.23  36,124   68   0.19  45,060   75   0.17 45,060  75  0.17 48,175  121  0.25 44,865  121  0.27
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Call loans and funds sold, and receivables under resale agreements and securities borrowing transactions:

                  

Domestic

  4,771   8   0.17  4,309   10   0.22  5,079   18   0.35 5,079  18  0.35 5,283  23  0.43 6,201  32  0.51

Foreign

  10,862   33   0.30  10,465   50   0.48  9,213   79   0.85 9,213  79  0.85 9,251  132  1.43 9,924  228  2.30
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Total

  15,633   41   0.26  14,774   60   0.41  14,292   97   0.68 14,292  97  0.68 14,534  155  1.07 16,125  260  1.62
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Trading account assets:

                  

Domestic

  6,755   32   0.47  5,262   16   0.31  4,408   27   0.62 4,408  27  0.62 4,654  50  1.07 5,930  71  1.19

Foreign

  11,950   142   1.19  11,602   135   1.16  10,335   136   1.31 10,335  136  1.31 10,821  152  1.41 9,197  141  1.53
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Total

  18,705   174   0.93  16,864   151   0.90  14,743   163   1.11 14,743  163  1.11 15,475  202  1.31 15,127  212  1.40
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Investments:

                  

Domestic

  31,690   127   0.40  25,625   88   0.34  20,357   78   0.38 20,357  78  0.38 21,267  97  0.46 20,109  137  0.68

Foreign

  2,850   79   2.77  3,058   102   3.34  3,915   87   2.24 3,915  87  2.24 3,544  77  2.18 4,471  95  2.13
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Total

  34,540   206   0.59  28,683   190   0.66  24,272   165   0.68 24,272  165  0.68 24,811  174  0.70 24,580  232  0.95
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Loans (1):

                  

Domestic

  54,207   593   1.09  52,866   565   1.07  53,930   510   0.95 53,930  510  0.95 58,049  511  0.88 55,897  531  0.95

Foreign

  21,634   395   1.83  24,279   466   1.92  25,412   499   1.96 25,412  499  1.96 24,822  599  2.41 28,037  851  3.03
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Total

  75,841   988   1.30  77,145   1,031   1.34  79,342   1,009   1.27 79,342  1,009  1.27 82,871  1,110  1.34 83,934  1,382  1.65
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Total interest-earning assets:

                  

Domestic

  113,323   780   0.69  117,547   709   0.60  121,163   660   0.54 121,163  660  0.54 129,065  708  0.55 127,051  797  0.63

Foreign

  52,985   678   1.28  56,043   791   1.41  56,546   849   1.50 56,546  849  1.50 56,801  1,054  1.86 57,580  1,410  2.45
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Total

  166,308   1,458   0.88  173,590   1,500   0.86  177,709   1,509   0.85 177,709  1,509  0.85 185,866  1,762  0.95 184,631  2,207  1.20
 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Noninterest-earning assets:

                  

Cash and due from banks

  4,012     2,285     3,312    3,312    3,076    3,832   

Other noninterest-earning assets (2)

  19,853     21,443     23,320    23,320    19,896    17,646   

Allowance for loan losses

  (558    (478    (456   (456   (380   (297  
 

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

   

Total noninterest-earning assets

  23,307     23,250     26,176    26,176    22,592    21,181   
 

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

   

Total average assets

  189,615     196,840     203,885    203,885    208,458    205,812   
 

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

   

 

Notes:

(1)

Average balances of loans include all nonaccrual loans. The amortized portion of net loan origination fees (costs) is included in interest income on loans.

(2)

The fair value carrying amounts of derivative contracts are reported in Other noninterest-earning assets.

Within total average assets, the percentage attributable to foreign activities was 33.0%32.7%, 33.2%31.2% and 32.7%31.3%, respectively, for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2015, 20162017, 2018 and 2017.2019.

 

  2015 2016 2017   2017 2018 2019 
  Average
balance
 Interest
expense
 Average
rate
 Average
balance
 Interest
expense
 Average
rate
 Average
balance
 Interest
expense
 Average
rate
   Average
balance
 Interest
expense
 Average
rate
 Average
balance
 Interest
expense
 Average
rate
 Average
balance
 Interest
expense
 Average
rate
 
  (in billions of yen, except percentages)   

 

(in billions of yen, except percentages)

 

Liabilities and equity:

                    

Interest-bearing liabilities:

                    

Deposits:

                    

Domestic

   77,126   50   0.06  81,090   60   0.07  83,293   51   0.06   83,293  51  0.06 90,078  60  0.07 87,168  94  0.11

Foreign

   19,801   100   0.51  20,958   154   0.73  23,173   214   0.92   23,173  214  0.92 24,567  323  1.32 26,693  519  1.95
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

    

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Total

   96,927   150   0.15  102,048   214   0.21  106,466   265   0.25   106,466  265  0.25 114,645  383  0.33 113,861  613  0.54
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

    

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Short-term borrowings (1):

                    

Domestic

   17,342   24   0.14  15,139   22   0.15  14,177   27   0.19   14,177  27  0.19 13,678  43  0.31 14,011  69  0.49

Foreign

   20,326   28   0.14  18,982   58   0.31  17,112   109   0.63   17,112  109  0.63 16,385  222  1.35 15,094  357  2.37
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

    

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Total

   37,668   52   0.14  34,121   80   0.24  31,289   136   0.43   31,289  136  0.43 30,063  265  0.88 29,105  426  1.47
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

    

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Trading account liabilities:

                    

Domestic

   2,629   14   0.52  2,092   13   0.61  1,697   14   0.82   1,697  14  0.82 1,454  27  1.87 1,735  34  1.93

Foreign

   1,692   17   1.05  1,195   8   0.69  1,049   7   0.71   1,049  7  0.71 1,235  14  1.16 1,249  16  1.29
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

    

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Total

   4,321   31   0.73  3,287   21   0.64  2,746   21   0.78   2,746  21  0.78 2,689  41  1.54 2,984  50  1.66
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

    

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Long-term debt:

                    

Domestic

   11,727   175   1.49  14,236   176   1.23  14,523   178   1.22   14,523  178  1.22 13,032  197  1.51 12,285  217  1.77

Foreign

   268   4   1.66  1,441   4   0.26  655   2   0.32   655  2  0.32 732  4  0.49 701  7  0.95
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

    

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Total

   11,995   179   1.49  15,677   180   1.15  15,178   180   1.18   15,178  180  1.18 13,764  201  1.46 12,986  224  1.72
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

    

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Total interest-bearing liabilities:

                    

Domestic

   108,824   263   0.24  112,557   271   0.24  113,690   270   0.24   113,690  270  0.24 118,242  327  0.28 115,199  414  0.36

Foreign

   42,087   149   0.36  42,576   224   0.53  41,989   332   0.79   41,989  332  0.79 42,919  563  1.31 43,737  899  2.06
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

    

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Total

   150,911   412   0.27  155,133   495   0.32  155,679   602   0.39   155,679  602  0.39 161,161  890  0.55 158,936  1,313  0.83
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

    

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

Noninterest-bearing liabilities(2)

   32,736     35,176     40,992      40,992    39,758    38,548   
  

 

    

 

    

 

     

 

    

 

    

 

   

Equity

   5,968     6,531     7,214      7,214    7,539    8,328   
  

 

    

 

    

 

     

 

    

 

    

 

   

Total average liabilities and equity

   189,615     196,840     203,885      203,885    208,458    205,812   
  

 

    

 

    

 

     

 

    

 

    

 

   

Net interest income and average interest rate spread

    1,046   0.61   1,005   0.54   907   0.46   907  0.46  872  0.40  894  0.37
   

 

    

 

    

 

     

 

    

 

    

 

  

Net interest income as a percentage of average total interest-earning assets

     0.63    0.58    0.51    0.51   0.47   0.48

 

Notes:

(1)

Short-term borrowings consist of Due to trust accounts, Call money and funds purchased, Payables under repurchase agreements and securities lending transactions, and Other short-term borrowings.

(2)

The fair value carrying amounts of derivative contracts are reported in Noninterest-bearing liabilities.

Within total average liabilities, which is the total of interest-bearing liabilities and noninterest-bearing liabilities shown in the above table, the percentage attributable to foreign activities was 28.5%28.4%, 28.2%26.9% and 28.4%27.6%, respectively, for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2015, 20162017, 2018 and 2017.2019.

Analysis of net interest income

The following tables show changes in the MHFG Group’s Interest and dividend income, Interest expense, and Net interest income based on changes in volume and changes in rate for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20162018 compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 20152017 and the fiscal year ended March 31, 20172019 compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016.2018. Changes attributable to the combined impact of changes in rate and volume have been allocated proportionately to the changes due to volume changes and changes due to rate changes.

 

  Fiscal year ended March 31, 2016
versus
fiscal year ended  March 31, 2015
 Fiscal year ended March 31, 2017
versus
fiscal year ended  March 31, 2016
   Fiscal year ended March 31, 2018
versus
fiscal year ended March 31, 2017
 Fiscal year ended March 31, 2019
versus
fiscal year ended March 31, 2018
 
  Increase (decrease)
due to changes in
 Net
change
  Increase (decrease)
due to changes in
 Net
change
   Increase (decrease)
due to changes in
  Net
change
  Increase (decrease)
due to changes in
  Net
change
 
  Volume Yield Volume Yield   Volume Yield Volume Yield 
  (in billions of yen)   

 

(in billions of yen)

 

Interest and dividend income:

              

Interest-bearing deposits in other banks:

              

Domestic

   13   (3  10   6   (9  (3   1  (1  —    (1  —    (1

Foreign

   5   4   9   6   4   10    5  41  46  (27 28  1 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

   18   1   19   12   (5  7    6  40  46  (28 28   —   
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Call loans and funds sold, and receivables under resale agreements and securities borrowing transactions:

              

Domestic

   (1  3   2   2   6   8    1  4  5  4  5  9 

Foreign

   (1  18   17   (6  35   29    —    53  53  10  86  96 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

   (2  21   19   (4  41   37    1  57  58  14  91  105 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Trading account assets:

              

Domestic

   (6  (10  (16  (3  14   11    2  21  23  15  6  21 

Foreign

   (4  (3  (7  (14  15   1    6  10  16  (23 12  (11
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

   (10  (13  (23  (17  29   12    8  31  39  (8 18  10 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Investments:

              

Domestic

   (22  (17  (39  (18  8   (10   4  15  19  (5 45  40 

Foreign

   6   17   23   19   (34  (15   (8 (2 (10 20  (2 18 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

   (16  —     (16  1   (26  (25   (4 13  9  15  43  58 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Loans:

              

Domestic

   (15  (13  (28  10   (65  (55   36  (35 1  (19 39  20 

Foreign

   51   20   71   22   11   33    (11 111  100  84  168  252 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

   36   7   43   32   (54  (22   25  76  101  65  207  272 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total interest and dividend income:

              

Domestic

   (31  (40  (71  (3  (46  (49   44  4  48  (6 95  89 

Foreign

   57   56   113   27   31   58    (8 213  205  64  292  356 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

   26   16   42   24   (15  9    36  217  253  58  387  445 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

   Fiscal year ended March 31, 2016
versus
fiscal year ended  March 31, 2015
  Fiscal year ended March 31, 2017
versus
fiscal year ended  March 31, 2016
 
   Increase (decrease)
due to changes in
  Net
change
  Increase (decrease)
due to changes in
  Net
change
 
   Volume  Rate   Volume  Rate  
   (in billions of yen) 

Interest expense:

       

Deposits:

       

Domestic

   3   7   10   1   (10  (9

Foreign

   6   48   54   18   42   60 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   9   55   64   19   32   51 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Short-term borrowings:

       

Domestic

   (3  1   (2  (1  6   5 

Foreign

   (2  32   30   (6  57   51 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   (5  33   28   (7  63   56 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Trading account liabilities:

       

Domestic

   (3  2   (1  (2  3   1 

Foreign

   (4  (5  (9  (1  —     (1
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   (7  (3  (10  (3  3   —   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Long-term debt:

       

Domestic

   31   (30  1   4   (2  2 

Foreign

   3   (3  —     (2  —     (2
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   34   (33  1   2   (2  —   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total interest expense:

       

Domestic

   28   (20  8   2   (3  (1

Foreign

   3   72   75   9   99   108 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   31   52   83   11   96   107 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net interest income:

       

Domestic

   (59  (20  (79  (5  (43  (48

Foreign

   54   (16  38   18   (68  (50
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   (5  (36  (41  13   (111  (98
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

   Fiscal year ended March 31, 2018
versus
fiscal year ended March 31, 2017
  Fiscal year ended March 31, 2019
versus
fiscal year ended March 31, 2018
 
   Increase (decrease)
due to changes in
  Net
change
  Increase (decrease)
due to changes in
  Net
change
 
   Volume  Rate  Volume  Rate 
   

 

(in billions of yen)

 

Interest expense:

       

Deposits:

       

Domestic

   4   5   9   (2  36   34 

Foreign

   14   95   109   30   166   196 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   18   100   118   28   202   230 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Short-term borrowings:

       

Domestic

   (1  17   16   1   25   26 

Foreign

   (5  118   113   (18  153   135 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   (6  135   129   (17  178   161 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Trading account liabilities:

       

Domestic

   (2  15   13   6   1   7 

Foreign

   1   6   7   —     2   2 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   (1  21   20   6   3   9 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Long-term debt:

       

Domestic

   (18  37   19   (11  31   20 

Foreign

   —     2   2   —     3   3 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   (18  39   21   (11  34   23 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total interest expense:

       

Domestic

   (17  74   57   (6  93   87 

Foreign

   10   221   231   12   324   336 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   (7  295   288   6   417   423 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net interest income:

       

Domestic

   61   (70  (9  —     2   2 

Foreign

   (18  (8  (26  52   (32  20 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   43   (78  (35  52   (30  22 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

II. Investment portfolio

The following table shows the amortized cost, fair value and net unrealized gains (losses) ofavailable-for-sale andheld-to-maturity securities at March 31, 2015, 20162017, 2018 and 2017:2019:

 

 2015 2016 2017  2017 2018 2019 
 Amortized
cost
 Fair
value
 Net
unrealized
gains
(losses)
 Amortized
cost
 Fair
value
 Net
unrealized
gains
(losses)
 Amortized
cost
 Fair
value
 Net
unrealized
gains
(losses)
  Amortized
cost
 Fair
value
 Net
unrealized
gains
(losses)
 Amortized
cost
 Fair
value
 Net
unrealized
gains
(losses)
 Amortized
cost
 Fair
value
 Net
unrealized
gains
(losses)
 
 (in billions of yen)  

 

(in billions of yen)

 

Available-for-sale securities:

                  

Domestic:

                  

Japanese government bonds

  17,391   17,414   23   15,672   15,763   91   10,257   10,263   6  10,257  10,263  6  13,334  13,332  (2 11,889  11,897  8 

Agency mortgage-backed securities(1)

  717   734   17   751   780   29   694   709   15  694  709  15  730  743  13  503  517  14 

Corporate bonds and other debt securities

  2,578   2,597   19   2,696   2,721   25   2,597   2,654   57  2,597  2,654  57  2,743  2,789  46  2,546  2,560  14 

Equity securities (marketable)

  1,697   4,396   2,699   1,610   3,726   2,116   1,452   3,722   2,270 

Equity securities (marketable)(2)

 1,452  3,722  2,270  1,478  3,915  2,437   —     —     —   
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total domestic

  22,383   25,141   2,758   20,729   22,990   2,261   15,000   17,348   2,348  15,000  17,348  2,348  18,285  20,779  2,494  14,938  14,974  36 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

�� 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Foreign:

                  

U.S. Treasury bonds and federal agency securities

  116   117   1   436   438   2   1,148   1,144   (4 1,148  1,144  (4 689  686  (3 1,009  1,009   —   

Other foreign government bonds

  962   966   4   940   942   2   934   935   1  934  935  1  1,058  1,058   —    1,342  1,342   —   

Agency mortgage-backed securities(2)(3)

  90   88   (2  169   169   —     139   134   (5 139  134  (5 153  146  (7 27  27   —   

Corporate bonds and other debt securities

  747   758   11   852   859   7   915   917   2  915  917  2  880  879  (1 778  781  3 

Equity securities (marketable)

  1   1   —     54   55   1   78   79   1 

Equity securities (marketable)(2)

 78  79  1  117  118  1   —     —     —   
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total foreign

  1,916   1,930   14   2,451   2,463   12   3,214   3,209   (5 3,214  3,209  (5 2,897  2,887  (10 3,156  3,159  3 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

  24,299   27,071   2,772   23,180   25,453   2,273   18,214   20,557   2,343  18,214  20,557  2,343  21,182  23,666  2,484  18,094  18,133  39 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Held-to-maturity securities:

                  

Domestic:

                  

Japanese government bonds

  4,360   4,389   29   3,760   3,817   57   3,060   3,097   37  3,060  3,097  37  1,960  1,984  24  1,120  1,140  20 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total domestic

  4,360   4,389   29   3,760   3,817   57   3,060   3,097   37  3,060  3,097  37  1,960  1,984  24  1,120  1,140  20 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Foreign:

                  

Agency mortgage-backed securities(3)(4)

  1,287   1,289   2   1,059   1,056   (3  757   750   (7 757  750  (7 558  538  (20 484  470  (14
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total foreign

  1,287   1,289   2   1,059   1,056   (3  757   750   (7 757  750  (7 558  538  (20 484  470  (14
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

  5,647   5,678   31   4,819   4,873   54   3,817   3,847   30  3,817  3,847  30  2,518  2,522  4  1,604  1,610  6 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

Notes:

(1)

All domestic agency mortgage-backed securities are mortgage-backed securities issued by Japan Housing Finance Agency, a Japanese government-sponsored enterprise.

(2)

The MHFG Group adopted ASUNo.2016-01 on April 1, 2018, resulting in a cumulative-effect adjustment from AOCI to Retained earnings for net unrealized gains on equity securities (marketable). Theavailable-for-sale category was eliminated for equity securities effective April 1, 2018. See Note 2 “Recently issued accounting pronouncements” for further details.

(3)

Foreign agency mortgage-backed securities primarily consist of Government National Mortgage Association (“Ginnie Mae”) securities, which are guaranteed by the United States government.

(3)(4)

All foreign agency mortgage-backed securities presented in the above tablethis line are Ginnie Mae securities.

The following table shows the book values, contractual maturities and weighted average yields ofavailable-for-sale andheld-to-maturity debt securities at March 31, 2017.2019. Fair value and amortized cost are the basis of the book value foravailable-for-sale andheld-to-maturity debt securities, respectively. Weighted average yields are calculated based on amortized cost for all debt securities.

 

 Maturity  Maturity 
 One year or less After one year
through
five years
 After five years
through
ten years
 After ten years Total  One year or less After one year
through
five years
 After five years
through
ten years
 After ten years Total 
 Amount Yield Amount Yield Amount Yield Amount Yield Amount Yield  Amount Yield Amount Yield Amount Yield Amount Yield Amount Yield 
 (in billions of yen, except percentages)  

 

(in billions of yen, except percentages)

 

Available-for-sale securities:

                    

Domestic:

                    

Japanese government bonds

  3,152   (0.13)%   5,549   (0.12)%   1,562   (0.02)%   —     —     10,263   (0.11)%  7,841  (0.15)%  2,329  (0.09)%  1,465  (0.12)%  262  0.31 11,897  (0.13)% 

Agency mortgage-backed securities

  —     —     —     —     —     —     709   1.04  709   1.04  —     —     —     —     —     —    517  1.06 517  1.06

Corporate bonds and other debt securities

  520   0.24  1,088   0.34  674   0.39  372   0.83  2,654   0.39 155  27.82 1,176  0.26 892  0.33 337  0.49 2,560  1.99
 

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

Total domestic

  3,672   (0.07)%   6,637   (0.04)%   2,236   0.10  1,081   0.97  13,626   0.05 7,996  0.39 3,505  0.03 2,357  0.05 1,116  0.71 14,974  0.28
 

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

Foreign:

                    

U.S. Treasury bonds and federal agency securities

  1,066   0.45  —     —     78   1.26  —     —     1,144   0.50 990  2.41 19  3.52  —     —     —     —    1,009  2.43

Other foreign government bonds

  757   1.62  172   5.73  6   0.43  —     —     935   2.36 1,107  1.99 235  2.46  —     —     —     —    1,342  2.07

Agency mortgage-backed securities

  —     —     —     —     —     —     134   2.74  134   2.74  —     —     —     —     —     —    27  3.35 27  3.35

Corporate bonds and other debt securities

  451   1.76  401   1.17  56   1.34  9   0.36  917   1.46 443  1.95 294  2.33 41  2.94 3  0.16 781  2.14
 

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

Total foreign

  2,274   1.10  573   2.53  140   1.25  143   2.58  3,130   1.44 2,540  2.15 548  2.43 41  2.94 30  3.06 3,159  2.21
 

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

Total

  5,946   0.37  7,210   0.16  2,376   0.17  1,224   1.17  16,756   0.31 10,536  0.81 4,053  0.35 2,398  0.10 1,146  0.77 18,133  0.61
 

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

Held-to-maturity securities:

                    

Domestic:

                    

Japanese government bonds

  1,100   0.19  1,480   0.19  480   0.67  —     —     3,060   0.27 640  0.15 380  0.72 100  0.47  —     —    1,120  0.37
 

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

Total domestic

  1,100   0.19  1,480   0.19  480   0.67  —     —     3,060   0.27 640  0.15 380  0.72 100  0.47  —     —    1,120  0.37
 

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

Foreign:

                    

Agency mortgage-backed securities

  —     —     —     —     —     —     757   3.73  757   3.73  —     —     —     —     —     —    484  3.72 484  3.72
 

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

Total foreign

  —     —     —     —     —     —     757   3.73  757   3.73  —     —     —     —     —     —    484  3.72 484  3.72
 

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

Total

  1,100   0.19  1,480   0.19  480   0.67  757   3.73  3,817   0.95 640  0.15 380  0.72 100  0.47 484  3.72 1,604  1.38
 

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

Other than Japanese government bonds, the MHFG Group did not have any securities of individual issuers with respect to which their aggregate book value exceeded 10% of the Group’s shareholders’ equity at March 31, 2017.2019.

In addition toAvailable-for-sale securities andHeld-to-maturity securities, the MHFG Group’s Investments also include Equity securities and Other investments. See Note 4 “Investments” to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report for information regarding Equity securities and Other investments.

III. Loan portfolio

Types of loans

The following table shows loans outstanding by domicile and industry of borrower at March 31, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2017:2019:

 

  2013   2014   2015   2016   2017   2015   2016   2017   2018   2019 
  (in billions of yen)   

 

(in billions of yen)

 

Domestic:

                    

Manufacturing

   8,079    8,026    8,224    8,345    8,741    8,224    8,345    8,740    8,156    9,558 

Construction and real estate

   7,478    7,205    7,354    7,734    7,654    7,416    7,822    7,772    8,102    8,955 

Services

   3,972    3,957    4,273    4,656    4,759    4,267    4,648    4,749    5,024    5,113 

Wholesale and retail

   5,356    5,351    5,587    5,409    5,142    5,586    5,407    5,140    5,113    5,163 

Transportation and communications

   3,147    3,247    3,157    3,268    3,491    3,157    3,268    3,491    3,565    3,622 

Banks and other financial institutions

   3,143    3,460    3,853    3,632    4,006    3,853    3,632    4,006    4,471    4,303 

Government and public institutions

   6,907    6,734    4,612    3,395    8,532    4,612    3,395    8,532    8,882    2,359 

Other industries(Note)

   4,522    4,983    5,080    4,619    4,427 

Other industries(1)

   5,079    4,618    4,427    5,018    5,478 

Individuals:

                    

Mortgage loans

   11,234    11,187    11,022    10,590    9,965    11,018    10,585    9,960    9,445    8,950 

Other

   742    788    848    924    940    798    852    840    884    908 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total domestic

   54,580    54,938    54,010    52,572    57,657    54,010    52,572    57,657    58,660    54,409 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Foreign:

                    

Commercial and industrial

   10,481    12,938    16,688    17,320    16,872    16,798    17,475    16,986    17,195    19,087 

Banks and other financial institutions

   4,089    4,610    6,077    6,382    6,760    6,859    7,099    7,389    7,465    9,126 

Government and public institutions

   596    883    1,011    1,175    960    119    303    217    303    297 

Other(Note)

   199    255    426    274    191 

Other

   426    274    191    38    33 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total foreign

   15,365    18,686    24,202    25,151    24,783    24,202    25,151    24,783    25,001    28,543 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   69,945    73,624    78,212    77,723    82,440    78,212    77,723    82,440    83,661    82,952 

Less: Unearned income and deferred loan fees—net

   112    139    164    168    156    164    168    156    146    152 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total loans before allowance for loan losses

   69,833    73,485    78,048    77,555    82,284    78,048    77,555    82,284    83,515    82,800 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

Notes:

Note:(1)

Other industries of Domestic and Other of Foreign includeincludes trade receivables and lease receivables of consolidated variable interest entities.

(2)

Certain loans of Foreign were reclassified from Government and public institutions to Commercial and industrial and Banks and other financial institutions in order to conform to the current year’s presentation.

There were no concentrations of loans exceeding 10% of total loans which are not disclosed as a category of loans in the table above.

Maturities and sensitivities of loans to changes in interest rates

The following table shows the maturities of loan portfolio by domicile and industry of borrower at March 31, 2017:2019:

 

  Maturity   Maturity 
  One year
or less
   After one year
through
five years
   After
five years
   Total   One year
or less
   After one year
through
five years
   After
five years
   Total 
  (in billions of yen)   

 

(in billions of yen)

 

Domestic:

                

Manufacturing

   4,151    3,370    1,220    8,741    4,234    3,775    1,549    9,558 

Construction and real estate

   1,581    3,111    2,962    7,654    1,636    3,535    3,784    8,955 

Services

   1,963    2,106    690    4,759    2,088    2,214    811    5,113 

Wholesale and retail

   2,952    1,628    562    5,142    2,945    1,792    426    5,163 

Transportation and communications

   848    2,007    636    3,491    978    1,819    825    3,622 

Banks and other financial institutions

   1,793    1,617    596    4,006    1,696    1,778    829    4,303 

Government and public institutions

   7,738    462    332    8,532    1,663    408    288    2,359 

Other industries

   2,408    1,359    660    4,427    3,336    1,313    829    5,478 

Individuals

   1,394    2,325    7,186    10,905    1,254    2,033    6,571    9,858 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total domestic

   24,828    17,985    14,844    57,657    19,830    18,667    15,912    54,409 

Foreign:

                

Total foreign

   11,744    10,645    2,394    24,783    14,452    11,553    2,538    28,543 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   36,572    28,630    17,238    82,440    34,282    30,220    18,450    82,952 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Of the above loans due after one year, loans which had floating rates and fixed rates at March 31, 20172019 were as follows:

 

   (in billions of yen) 

Floating rates

   35,04336,742 

Fixed rates

   10,82511,928 
  

 

 

 

Total

   45,86848,670 
  

 

 

 

Impaired loans

The MHFG Group considers loans to be impaired when it is probable that the Group will be unable to collect all the scheduled payments of principal and interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loans. The Group classifies loans to special attention, intensive control, substantially bankrupt and bankrupt obligors as impaired loans. Impaired loans include loans past due for 90 days or more and restructured loans that meet the definition of troubled debt restructuring in accordance with ASC 310, “Receivables” (“(“ASC 310”). All of the Group’s impaired loans are designated as nonaccrual loans. There are no loans that are ninety days past due and still accruing. The Group does not have any loans to borrowers that cause management to have serious doubts as to the ability of such borrowers to comply with the present loan repayment terms for the periods presented other than those already designated as impaired loans. The following table shows the distribution of impaired loans at March 31, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018 and 20172019 by domicile and industry of borrower:

 

  2013   2014   2015   2016   2017   2015   2016   2017   2018   2019 
  (in billions of yen)   

 

(in billions of yen)

 

Domestic:

                    

Manufacturing

   336    229    480    374    379    480    374    379    142    109 

Construction and real estate

   249    138    101    77    57    101    77    57    41    46 

Services

   90    79    71    66    66    71    66    66    58    74 

Wholesale and retail

   173    156    150    147    147    150    147    147    131    135 

Transportation and communications

   59    48    36    29    23    36    29    23    28    31 

Banks and other financial institutions

   14    11    5    3    6    5    3    6    12    10 

Other industries

   5    1    1    4    7    1    4    7    4    9 

Individuals

   235    195    143    123    105    143    123    105    90    81 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total domestic

   1,161    857    987    823    790    987    823    790    506    495 

Foreign:

                    

Total foreign

   303    288    188    167    191    188    167    191    109    151 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total impaired loans

   1,464    1,145    1,175    990    981    1,175    990    981    615    646 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Had interest on nonaccrual loans been accrued at the original contractual terms, gross interest income on domestic and foreign nonaccrual loans outstanding during the fiscal year ended March 31, 20172019 would have been ¥11¥8 billion and ¥3¥5 billion, respectively. The MHFG group recognized interest income on these domestic and foreign loans of ¥9¥7 billion and ¥2¥1 billion, respectively, in the consolidated statements of income for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017.2019.

Cross-border outstandings

Cross-border outstandings are defined as loans (including accrued interest), acceptances, interest-bearing deposits with other banks, other interest-bearing investments and any other monetary assets denominated in Japanese yen or othernon-local currencies. This cross-border disclosure is based on the reports to the Bank of Japan required under Japanese foreign exchange-related law. Local currency outstandings are netted out from cross-border outstandings.

The following table sets forth the cross-border outstandings to borrowers in countries with respect to which the total of such outstandings exceeded 0.75% of consolidated total assets at March 31, 2015, 20162017, 2018 and 2017:2019:

 

  Public
institutions
   Banks   Others   Total   % of total
assets
 Undrawn
commitments
   Public
institutions
   Banks   Others   Total   % of total
assets
 Undrawn
commitments
 
  (in billions of yen, except percentages) 

2015

           

United States

   4,666    341    5,338    10,345    5.44  8,357 

Germany

   1,206    192    279    1,677    0.88  316 

France

   1,183    294    197    1,674    0.88  543 

China

   108    639    767    1,514    0.80  82 

2016

           

United States

   3,928    261    4,352    8,541    4.41  8,531 

Germany

   1,392    224    266    1,882    0.97  338 

France

   1,276    304    214    1,794    0.93  540 

United Kingdom

   15    264    1,258    1,537    0.79  954 

Korea

   212    340    932    1,484    0.77  92 
  

 

(in billions of yen, except percentages)

 

2017

                      

United States

   2,827    254    4,950    8,031    4.01  8,279    2,827    254    4,950    8,031    4.01 8,279 

Germany

   1,243    190    305    1,738    0.87  833    1,243    190    305    1,738    0.87 833 

United Kingdom

   82    309    1,332    1,723    0.86  1,223    82    309    1,332    1,723    0.86 1,223 

2018

           

United States

   3,090    340    4,231    7,661    3.75 7,137 

United Kingdom

   9    374    1,821    2,204    1.08 1,006 

Germany

   1,518    275    355    2,148    1.05 728 

2019

           

United States

   1,440    352    3,966    5,758    2.91 7,847 

United Kingdom

   10    664    2,829    3,503    1.77 1,210 

France

   1,475    177    955    2,607    1.32 619 

IV. Summary of loan loss experience

The following table shows an analysis of loan loss experience by domicile and industry of borrower for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2017:2019:

 

  2013 2014 2015 2016 2017   2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 
  (in billions of yen, except percentages)   

 

(in billions of yen, except percentages)

 

Allowance for loan losses at beginning of fiscal year

   683   773   626   520   451    626  520  451  480  310 

Provision (credit) for loan losses

   140   (126  (60  35   38    (60 35  38  (126 32 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Charge-offs:

            

Domestic:

            

Manufacturing

   25   20   8   37   2    8  37  2  6  4 

Construction and real estate

   5   1   3   2   1    3  2  1   —    1 

Services

   10   3   2   4   3    2  4  3  5  2 

Wholesale and retail

   11   13   15   14   6    15  14  6  12  10 

Transportation and communications

   2   7   1   5   1    1  5  1  1   —   

Other industries

   —     —     —     —    2 

Individuals

   17   13   10   8   7    10  8  7  5  5 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total domestic

   70   57   39   70   20    39  70  20  29  24 

Total foreign

   25   8   40   42   11    40  42  11  27  24 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total charge-offs

   95   65   79   112   31    79  112  31  56  48 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Recoveries:

            

Domestic:

            

Manufacturing

   4   6   2   2   1    2  2  1  1  1 

Construction and real estate

   8   5   4   1   2    4  1  2  1  1 

Services

   3   3   2   2   1    2  2  1  2  1 

Wholesale and retail

   3   3   3   8   5    3  8  5  1  3 

Transportation and communications

   1   3   1   1   4    1  1  4   —     —   

Banks and other financial institutions

   1   —     —     —     —      —     —     —    1   —   

Other industries

   —     1   1   —     —      1   —     —     —     —   

Individuals

   4   3   3   2   3    3  2  3  2  1 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total domestic

   24   24   16   16   16    16  16  16  8  7 

Total foreign

   8   2   7   5   10    7  5  10  7  7 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total recoveries

   32   26   23   21   26    23  21  26  15  14 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net charge-offs

   63   39   56   91   5    56  91  5  41  34 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Others(Note)

   13   18   10   (13  (4   10  (13 (4 (3 (1

Balance at end of fiscal year

   773   626   520   451   480    520  451  480  310  307 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Ratio of net charge-offs to average loans outstanding

   0.09  0.05  0.07  0.12  0.01   0.07 0.12 0.01 0.05 0.04
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

Note:Others includes primarily foreign exchange translation.

Note: Others includes primarily foreign exchange translation.

The following table shows an allocation of the MHFG Group’s allowance for loan losses by domicile and industry of borrower at March 31, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2017:2019:

 

 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017  2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 
 Amount % of
loans  in
each
category
to total
loans
 Amount % of
loans in
each
category
to total
loans
 Amount % of
loans in
each
category
to total
loans
 Amount % of
loans in
each
category
to total
loans
 Amount % of
loans in
each
category
to total
loans
  Amount % of
loans in
each
category
to total
loans
 Amount % of
loans in
each
category
to total
loans
 Amount % of
loans in
each
category
to total
loans
 Amount % of
loans in
each
category
to total
loans
 Amount % of
loans in
each
category
to total
loans
 
 (in billions of yen, except percentages)  

 

(in billions of yen, except percentages)

 

Domestic:

                    

Manufacturing

  210   11.55  177   10.90  187   10.52  154   10.74  201   10.60 187  10.52 154  10.74 201  10.60 85  9.75 75  11.52

Construction and real estate

  79   10.69  51   9.79  33   9.40  25   9.95  20   9.28 33  9.40 25  9.95 20  9.28 17  9.68 18  10.80

Services

  35   5.68  30   5.37  26   5.46  26   5.99  28   5.77 26  5.46 26  5.99 28  5.77 20  6.01 23  6.16

Wholesale and retail

  84   7.66  65   7.27  66   7.14  58   6.96  63   6.24 66  7.14 58  6.96 63  6.24 52  6.11 48  6.22

Transportation and communications

  26   4.50  22   4.41  14   4.04  9   4.20  10   4.23 14  4.04 9  4.20 10  4.23 10  4.26 17  4.37

Banks and other financial institutions

  28   4.49  21   4.70  18   4.93  14   4.67  13   4.86 18  4.93 14  4.67 13  4.86 20  5.34 4  5.19

Other industries(Note)

  12   16.34  5   15.92  5   12.39  5   10.31  6   15.72 5  12.39 5  10.31 6  15.72 7  16.62 11  9.45

Individuals

  109   17.12  95   16.26  59   15.18  42   14.82  34   13.24 59  15.18 42  14.82 34  13.24 25  12.35 20  11.88

Mortgage loans

  86   16.06  74   15.19  51   14.09  35   13.63  27   12.10 51  14.09 35  13.63 27  12.10 19  11.29 15  10.79

Other

  23   1.06  21   1.07  8   1.09  7   1.19  7   1.14 8  1.09 7  1.19 7  1.14 6  1.06 5  1.09
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total domestic

  583   78.03  466   74.62  408   69.06  333   67.64  375   69.94 408  69.06 333  67.64 375  69.94 236  70.12 216  65.59

Total foreign

  190   21.97  160   25.38  112   30.94  118   32.36  105   30.06 112  30.94 118  32.36 105  30.06 74  29.88 91  34.41
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total allowance for loan losses

  773   100.00  626   100.00  520   100.00  451   100.00  480   100.00 520  100.00 451  100.00 480  100.00 310  100.00 307  100.00
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

Note:

Other industries includes government and public institutions.

V. Deposits

The following table shows the average amount of, and the average rate on, the following deposit categories for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2015, 20162017, 2018 and 2017:2019:

 

  2015 2016 2017   2017 2018 2019 
  Average
amount
   Average
rate
 Average
amount
   Average
rate
 Average
amount
   Average
rate
   Average
amount
   Average
rate
 Average
amount
   Average
rate
 Average
amount
   Average
rate
 
  (in billions of yen, except percentages)   

 

(in billions of yen, except percentages)

 

Domestic offices:

                    

Noninterest-bearing demand deposits

   12,378    —    13,268    —    17,310    —     17,310    —   19,643    —   22,116    —  

Interest-bearing demand deposits

   36,267    0.02  38,928    0.02  48,986    0.01   48,986    0.01 56,478    0.01 53,700    0.02

Time deposits

   28,984    0.11  30,658    0.14  27,929    0.16   27,929    0.16 27,035    0.19 26,424    0.31

Certificates of deposit

   11,875    0.09  11,504    0.08  6,378    0.01   6,378    0.01 6,565    0.01 7,044    0.01
  

 

    

 

    

 

     

 

    

 

    

 

   

Foreign offices:

                    

Noninterest-bearing demand deposits

   1,179    —    1,429    —    2,321    —     2,321    —   2,244    —   1,750    —  

Interest-bearing deposits, principally time deposits

   13,647    0.59  16,276    0.77  18,313    0.93   18,313    0.93 19,161    1.33  20,169    1.93

Certificates of deposit

   6,154    0.31  4,682    0.60  4,860    0.91   4,860    0.91 5,406    1.25 6,524    1.99
  

 

    

 

    

 

     

 

    

 

    

 

   

Total

   110,484    0.14  116,745    0.18  126,097    0.21   126,097    0.21 136,532    0.28 137,727    0.45
  

 

    

 

    

 

     

 

    

 

    

 

   

The total amounts of deposits by foreign depositors in domestic offices at March 31, 2015, 20162017, 2018 and 20172019 were ¥871¥645 billion, ¥719¥779 billion and ¥645¥1,625 billion, respectively.

At March 31, 2017,2019, the balance and remaining maturities of time deposits and certificates of deposit issued by domestic offices in amounts of ¥10 million (approximately US$90 thousand at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s noon buying rate on March 31, 2017)2019) or more and the balances of these deposits issued by foreign offices in amounts of US$100,000 or more are shown in the following table:

 

  Time
deposits
   Certificates of
deposit
   Total   Time
deposits
   Certificates of
deposit
   Total 
  (in billions of yen)   

 

(in billions of yen)

 

Domestic offices:

            

Due in three months or less

   9,238    5,337    14,575    8,875    5,075    13,950 

Due after three months through six months

   3,525    240    3,765    2,875    270    3,145 

Due after six months through twelve months

   3,620    245    3,865    3,403    148    3,551 

Due after twelve months

   1,380    55    1,435    1,425    151    1,576 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   17,763    5,877    23,640    16,578    5,644    22,222 

Foreign offices

   14,863    4,754    19,617    17,607    7,695    25,302 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   32,626    10,631    43,257    34,185    13,339    47,524 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

VI. Short-term borrowings

The following table shows certain additional information with respect to the MHFG Group’s short-term borrowings for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2015, 20162017, 2018 and 2017:2019:

 

  2015 2016 2017   2017 2018 2019 
  (in billions of yen, except percentages)   

 

(in billions of yen, except percentages)

 

Due to trust accounts:

        

Average balance outstanding during the fiscal year

   726   1,239   3,941    3,941  4,016  2,534 

Maximum balance outstanding at anymonth-end during the fiscal year

   1,257   4,467   4,123    4,123  4,094  4,125 

Balance at end of fiscal year

   1,241   4,467   4,123    4,123  3,993  312 

Weighted average interest rate during the fiscal year

   0.17  0.09  0.02   0.02 0.02 0.02

Weighted average interest rate on balance at end of fiscal year

   0.12  0.02  0.02   0.02 0.02 0.21

Call money and funds purchased, and payables under repurchase agreements and securities lending transactions:

        

Average balance outstanding during the fiscal year

   33,938   31,009   25,629    25,629  24,692  24,609 

Maximum balance outstanding at anymonth-end during the fiscal year

   36,530   35,541   25,968    25,968  25,470  27,694 

Balance at end of fiscal year

   27,165   22,199   21,144    21,144  20,595  19,280 

Weighted average interest rate during the fiscal year

   0.13  0.24  0.48   0.48 1.01 1.60

Weighted average interest rate on balance at end of fiscal year

   0.18  0.35  0.58   0.58 1.07 1.53

Other short-term borrowings:

        

Average balance outstanding during the fiscal year

   3,004   1,873   1,719    1,719  1,355  1,962 

Maximum balance outstanding at anymonth-end during the fiscal year

   6,007   2,391   2,135    2,135  1,736  2,091 

Balance at end of fiscal year

   1,583   2,080   1,477    1,477  1,688  1,995 

Weighted average interest rate during the fiscal year

   0.21  0.31  0.66   0.66 1.13 1.67

Weighted average interest rate on balance at end of fiscal year

   0.25  0.43  0.91   0.91 1.35 1.99

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

TheTo the Shareholders and the Board of Directors and Shareholders

of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of March 31, 20172019 and 2016, and2018, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended March 31, 2017. These2019, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)statements”). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. and subsidiariesthe Company at March 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, and the consolidated results of theirits operations and theirits cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended March 31, 2017,2019, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. and subsidiaries’the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2017,2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated July 7, 20175, 2019 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ Ernst & Young ShinNihon LLC

We have served as the Company’s auditor for SEC reporting purposes since 2006, and as its Japanese statutory

auditor since 2000, which included the years we served as joint auditors.

Tokyo, Japan

July 7, 20175, 2019

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

TheTo the Shareholders and the Board of Directors and Shareholders

of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.

Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We have audited Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. and subsidiaries’ (the “Company”) internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2017,2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the “COSO criteria”). TheIn our opinion, Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. and subsidiaries’subsidiaries (the “Company”) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2019, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of March 31, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended March 31, 2019, and the related notes and our report dated July 5, 2019 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control overOver Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. and subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2017, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2017 and 2016, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended March 31, 2017 and our report dated July 7, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Ernst & Young ShinNihon LLC

Tokyo, Japan

July 7, 20175, 2019

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

MARCH 31, 20162018 AND 20172019

 

   2016  2017 
   (in millions of yen) 

Assets:

   

Cash and due from banks (Note 9)

   1,322,597   1,592,191 

Interest-bearing deposits in other banks (Note 9)

   35,327,408   45,994,780 

Call loans and funds sold

   893,545   1,037,986 

Receivables under resale agreements (Note 29)

   7,805,643   8,967,712 

Receivables under securities borrowing transactions (Note 29)

   3,407,391   3,350,052 

Trading account assets (including assets pledged that secured parties are permitted to sell or repledge of ¥7,020,645 million in 2016 and ¥5,861,942 million in 2017) (Notes 9, 28 and 29)

   30,020,743   24,998,493 

Investments (Notes 4, 9 and 28):

   

Available-for-sale securities (including assets pledged that secured parties are permitted to sell or repledge of ¥513,054 million in 2016 and ¥442,775 million in 2017)

   25,452,525   20,557,118 

Held-to-maturity securities (including assets pledged that secured parties are permitted to sell or repledge of ¥1,238,965 million in 2016 and ¥1,050,714 million in 2017)

   4,818,961   3,817,360 

Other investments

   613,446   595,069 

Loans (Notes 5, 6, 9 and 28)

   77,555,369   82,283,906 

Allowance for loan losses

   (451,247  (479,673
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Loans, net of allowance

   77,104,122   81,804,233 

Premises and equipment—net (Note 7)

   1,837,990   2,041,273 

Due from customers on acceptances

   109,567   184,171 

Accrued income

   274,226   270,694 

Goodwill (Note 8)

   19,097   95,176 

Intangible assets (Note 8)

   48,651   94,147 

Deferred tax assets (Note 20)

   57,349   63,520 

Other assets (Notes 5, 9, 13, 21, 23 and 28)

   4,696,890   4,992,329 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total assets

   193,810,151   200,456,304 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The following table presents the assets of consolidated variable interest entities (“VIE”s), which are included in the consolidated balance sheets above. The assets in the table below can be used only to settle obligations of consolidated VIEs.

   2018  2019 
   

 

(in millions of yen)

 

Assets:

   

Cash and due from banks

   1,685,835   1,404,008 

Interest-bearing deposits in other banks

   46,485,086   44,268,731 

Call loans and funds sold

   720,461   763,453 

Receivables under resale agreements

   8,080,927   12,997,424 

Receivables under securities borrowing transactions

   4,408,508   2,578,134 

Trading account assets (including assets pledged that secured parties are permitted to sell or repledge of ¥4,897,190 million in 2018 and ¥3,244,305 million in 2019)

   24,302,543   21,018,230 

Investments (Note 4):

   

Available-for-sale securities (including assets pledged that secured parties are permitted to sell or repledge of ¥932,302 million in 2018 and ¥1,132,602 million in 2019)

   23,665,628   18,133,916 

Held-to-maturity securities (including assets pledged that secured parties are permitted to sell or repledge of ¥677,046 million in 2018 and ¥476,146 million in 2019)

   2,517,551   1,604,104 

Equity securities

   —     4,034,609 

Other investments

   585,896   389,740 

Loans (Notes 5 and 6)

   83,514,644   82,799,943 

Allowance for loan losses

   (309,902  (307,201
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Loans, net of allowance

   83,204,742   82,492,742 

Premises and equipment—net (Note 7)

   2,116,184   1,900,952 

Due from customers on acceptances

   212,596   187,137 

Accrued income

   301,332   342,845 

Goodwill (Note 8)

   95,184   95,151 

Intangible assets (Note 8)

   84,447   74,240 

Deferred tax assets

   57,088   49,775 

Other assets (Note 13)

   5,731,634   5,276,004 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total assets

   204,255,642   197,611,195 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 
The following table presents the assets of consolidated variable interest entities (“VIE”s), which are included in the consolidated balance sheets above. The assets in the table below can be used only to settle obligations of consolidated VIEs.

 

   2018  2019 
   

 

(in millions of yen)

 

Assets of consolidated VIEs:

   

Cash and due from banks

   31,435   29,972 

Interest-bearing deposits in other banks

   95,048   31,676 

Call loans and funds sold

   5,312   115,199 

Trading account assets

   2,558,186   2,456,198 

Investments

   48,565   52,493 

Loans, net of allowance

   2,323,081   2,359,669 

All other assets

   806,141   1,003,133 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total assets

   5,867,768   6,048,340 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

   2016   2017 
   (in millions of yen) 

Assets of consolidated VIEs:

    

Cash and due from banks

   51,304    96,077 

Interest-bearing deposits in other banks

   85,976    81,807 

Trading account assets

   1,639,050    2,099,890 

Investments

   40,732    46,180 

Loans, net of allowance

   2,255,409    2,149,321 

Other

   620,008    772,290 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

       4,692,479        5,245,565 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

F-5

See the accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS—(Continued)

MARCH 31, 20162018 AND 20172019

 

  2016 2017   2018 2019 
  (in millions of yen)   

 

(in millions of yen)

 

Liabilities and equity:

      

Deposits (Notes 9 and 10):

   

Deposits:

   

Domestic:

      

Noninterest-bearing deposits

   16,108,032  19,063,774    21,068,569  23,844,639 

Interest-bearing deposits

   79,596,483  87,358,504    91,206,963  84,019,038 

Foreign:

      

Noninterest-bearing deposits

   1,601,417  1,996,450    2,257,350  1,793,803 

Interest-bearing deposits

   20,631,790  22,766,225    22,351,124  28,639,436 

Due to trust accounts (Note 11)

   4,467,305  4,123,088 

Due to trust accounts

   3,992,544  312,347 

Call money and funds purchased

   2,521,009  1,255,172    2,105,294  2,841,932 

Payables under repurchase agreements (Notes 29 and 30)

   16,833,263  17,969,941 

Payables under securities lending transactions (Notes 29 and 30)

   2,844,653  1,919,249 

Payables under repurchase agreements (Note 30)

   16,656,930  14,640,369 

Payables under securities lending transactions (Note 30)

   1,832,870  1,797,737 

Other short-term borrowings (Note 12)

   2,080,039  1,476,612    1,688,018  1,994,826 

Trading account liabilities (Notes 28 and 29)

   17,111,142  13,591,740 

Trading account liabilities

   13,115,270  10,120,968 

Bank acceptances outstanding

   109,567  184,171    212,596  187,137 

Income taxes payable

   96,710  73,598    64,501  58,688 

Deferred tax liabilities (Note 20)

   201,859  140,475 

Deferred tax liabilities

   306,203  108,120 

Accrued expenses

   181,441  209,309    232,885  288,556 

Long-term debt (including liabilities accounted for at fair value of ¥1,055,626 million in 2016, and ¥1,496,488 million in 2017) (Notes 12 and 28)

   14,765,527  14,529,414 

Other liabilities (Notes 13, 21, 23, 24 and 28)

   6,476,723  5,026,525 

Long-term debt (including liabilities accounted for at fair value of ¥1,955,636 million in 2018, and ¥2,433,294 million in 2019) (Notes 12 and 28)

   12,955,230  11,529,400 

Other liabilities (Note 13)

   4,705,595  5,932,706 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total liabilities

   185,626,960  191,684,247    194,751,942  188,109,702 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Commitments and contingencies (Note 24)

      

Equity:

      

MHFG shareholders’ equity:

      

Preferred stock (Note 14)

   98,924  —   

Common stock (Note 15)—no par value, authorized 48,000,000,000 shares in 2016 and 2017, and issued 25,030,525,657 shares in 2016, and 25,386,307,945 shares in 2017

   5,703,144  5,826,149 

Common stock (Note 15)—no par value, authorized 48,000,000,000 shares in 2018 and 2019, and issued 25,389,644,945 shares in 2018, and 25,392,498,945 shares in 2019

   5,826,383  5,829,657 

Retained earnings

   746,785  918,894    1,306,141  2,740,545 

Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax (Note 17)

   1,469,308  1,521,163    1,741,894  164,021 

Less: Treasury stock, at cost—Common stock 10,929,211 shares in 2016, and 19,992,754 shares in 2017

   (3,610 (4,849

Less: Treasury stock, at cost—Common stock 24,829,446 shares in 2018, and 33,962,404 shares in 2019

   (5,997 (7,704
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total MHFG shareholders’ equity

   8,014,551  8,261,357    8,868,421  8,726,519 

Noncontrolling interests

   168,640  510,700    635,279  774,974 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total equity

   8,183,191  8,772,057    9,503,700  9,501,493 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total liabilities and equity

   193,810,151  200,456,304    204,255,642  197,611,195 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

The following table presents the liabilities of consolidated VIEs, which are included in the consolidated balance sheets above. The creditors or investors of the consolidated VIEs have no recourse to the MHFG Group, except where the Group provides credit enhancement through guarantees or other means.

 

  2016   2017   2018 2019 
  (in millions of yen)   (in millions of yen) 

Liabilities of consolidated VIEs:

       

Payables under securities lending transactions

   —    108,038 

Other short-term borrowings

   292,614    60,575    31,392  23,495 

Trading account liabilities

   —      7,723    22   —   

Long-term debt

   411,679    431,190    419,649  344,526 

Other

   967,141    1,147,895 

All other liabilities

   1,305,640  1,523,791 
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total liabilities

       1,671,434        1,647,383        1,756,703        1,999,850 
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

See the accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2015, 20162017, 2018 AND 20172019

 

  2015 2016 2017   2017 2018 2019 
  (in millions of yen)   (in millions of yen) 

Interest and dividend income:

        

Loans, including fees

   988,236  1,030,802  1,009,094    1,009,094  1,109,776  1,381,553 

Investments:

        

Interest

   130,626  110,411  88,311    88,311  88,319  144,199 

Dividends

   74,673  79,600  77,343    77,343  86,066  88,289 

Trading account assets

   174,458  151,278  163,114    163,114  202,125  211,749 

Call loans and funds sold

   7,555  6,983  5,068    5,068  5,699  5,547 

Receivables under resale agreements and securities borrowing transactions

   33,379  53,007  91,453    91,453  149,197  254,862 

Deposits

   48,732  68,090  74,647 

Deposits in other banks

   74,647  120,704  121,244 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total interest and dividend income

   1,457,659  1,500,171  1,509,030    1,509,030  1,761,886  2,207,443 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Interest expense:

        

Deposits

   149,776  213,601  264,748    264,748  382,706  613,570 

Trading account liabilities

   31,402  21,031  21,399    21,399  41,514  49,660 

Call money and funds purchased

   7,545  7,830  3,173    3,173  5,031  11,121 

Payables under repurchase agreements and securities lending transactions

   36,641  66,579  120,578    120,578  243,569  382,045 

Other short-term borrowings

   7,490  6,791  12,175    12,175  16,166  33,313 

Long-term debt

   179,128  179,575  179,639    179,639  200,950  223,767 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total interest expense

   411,982  495,407  601,712    601,712  889,936  1,313,476 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net interest income

   1,045,677  1,004,764  907,318    907,318  871,950  893,967 

Provision (credit) for loan losses (Notes 5 and 6)

   (60,223 34,560  37,668 

Provision (credit) for loan losses (Note 6)

   37,668  (126,362 32,459 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net interest income after provision (credit) for loan losses

   1,105,900  970,204  869,650    869,650  998,312  861,508 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Noninterest income:

    

Fee and commission income (Note 26)

   715,657  742,953  746,537 

Noninterest income(Note 26):

    

Fee and commission income

   825,963  865,711  853,290 

Foreign exchange gains (losses)—net (Note 27)

   (34,520 113,553  69,453    69,453  91,793  93,577 

Trading account gains (losses)—net (Note 27)

   689,959  559,139  (42,481   (42,481 236,982  328,841 

Investment gains (losses)—net (Note 4)

   271,174  263,793  333,270 

Investment gains (losses)—net (Note 2):

    

Debt securities

   59,517  7,757  (3,842

Equity securities

   273,753  289,400  (155,947

Equity in earnings (losses) of equity method investees—net

   17,502  28,969  26,785    26,785  24,342  29,172 

Gains on disposal of premises and equipment

   2,754  10,223  5,638    5,638  8,225  5,145 

Other noninterest income

   138,689  165,264  228,830    149,404  80,453  72,135 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total noninterest income

   1,801,215  1,883,894  1,368,032    1,368,032      1,604,663      1,222,371 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Noninterest expenses:

        

Salaries and employee benefits (Note 21)

   605,454  633,557  663,166 

Salaries and employee benefits

   663,166  688,481  682,645 

General and administrative expenses

   530,365  548,027  570,897    570,897  585,992  761,528 

Impairment of goodwill (Note 8)

   —    6,222   —   

Occupancy expenses

   189,004  195,898  194,955    194,955  191,592  207,814 

Fee and commission expenses

   134,395  146,107  148,483    177,006  189,187  189,722 

Provision (credit) for losses onoff-balance-sheet instruments (Note 24)

   (2,827 (16,447 19,464 

Provision (credit) for losses onoff-balance-sheet instruments

   19,464  (30,244 (8,969

Other noninterest expenses

   183,071  144,129  160,342    131,819  138,669  166,079 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total noninterest expenses

   1,639,462  1,657,493  1,757,307    1,757,307  1,763,677  1,998,819 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Income before income tax expense

   1,267,653  1,196,605  480,375    480,375  839,298  85,060 

Income tax expense (Note 20)

   437,420  346,542  91,244    91,244  237,604  9,335 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net income

   830,233  850,063  389,131    389,131  601,694  75,725 

Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

   27,185  (429 26,691    26,691  24,086  (8,746
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net income attributable to MHFG shareholders

   803,048  850,492  362,440    362,440  577,608  84,471 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 
Earnings per common share (Note 19):  (in yen)   (in yen) 

Basic net income per common share

   32.75  34.19  14.33    14.33  22.77  3.33 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Diluted net income per common share

   31.64  33.50  14.28    14.28  22.76  3.33 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Dividends per share:

    

Class XI preferred stock

   10   —     —   

Common stock

   7.50  7.50  7.50 
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

See the accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2015, 20162017, 2018 AND 20172019

 

  2015   2016 2017   2017 2018 2019 
  (in millions of yen)   (in millions of yen) 

Net income(1)

   830,233    850,063  389,131    389,131    601,694        75,725 
  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:

         

Net unrealized gains (losses) onavailable-for-sale securities, net of tax (Note 4)

   622,975    (338,822 51,957 

Net unrealized gains (losses) onavailable-for-sale securities, net of tax

   51,957  97,428  (9,472

Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax

   136,299    (123,221 (12,322   (12,322 (29,934 (23,781

Pension liability adjustments, net of tax (Note 21)

   163,338    (111,599 11,922 

Pension liability adjustments, net of tax

   11,922  155,044  (24,168

Own credit risk adjustments, net of tax (2)

   —     —    14,476 
  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

   922,612    (573,642 51,557    51,557  222,538  (42,945
  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total comprehensive income

   1,752,845    276,421  440,688    440,688  824,232  32,780 

Less: Total comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

   26,669    (2,373 26,724    26,724  25,893  (8,960
  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total comprehensive income attributable to MHFG shareholders

   1,726,176    278,794  413,964    413,964      798,339      41,740 
  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

Notes:

Note:(1)

The amounts that have been reclassified out of Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax into net income are presented in Note 17 “Accumulated other comprehensive income”.

(2)

The MHFG Group adopted ASUNo.2016-01 on April 1, 2018. The ASU requires an entity to present separately in other comprehensive income the portion of the total change in the fair value of a liability resulting from a change in the instrument-specific credit risk when the entity has elected to measure the liability at fair value in accordance with the fair value option for financial instruments. See Note 2 “Recently issued accounting pronouncements” for further details.

See the accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY

FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2015, 20162017, 2018 AND 20172019

 

   2015  2016  2017 
   (in millions of yen) 

Preferred stock (Note 14):

    

Balance at beginning of fiscal year

   312,651   213,121   98,924 

Conversion to common stock

   (99,530  (114,197  (98,924
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at end of fiscal year

   213,121   98,924   —   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Common stock (Note 15):

    

Balance at beginning of fiscal year

   5,489,295   5,590,396   5,703,144 

Issuance of new shares of common stock due to conversion of preferred stock

   99,530   114,197   98,924 

Issuance of new shares of common stock due to exercise of stock acquisition rights

   864   772   969 

Gains (losses) on disposal of treasury stock

   67   82   (56

Stock-based compensation related to stock options (Note 22)

   640   (1,058  (1,009

Performance-based stock compensation program

   —     —     354 

Change in ownership interests in consolidated subsidiaries

   —     (1,245  23,824 

Cancellation of treasury stock

   —     —     (1
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at end of fiscal year

   5,590,396   5,703,144   5,826,149 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Retained earnings (Accumulated deficit):

    

Balance at beginning of fiscal year, previously reported

   (537,479  89,432   746,785 

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles, net of tax (Notes 2 and 25)

   —     —     (329

Balance at beginning of fiscal year, adjusted

   (537,479  89,432   746,456 

Net income attributable to MHFG shareholders

   803,048   850,492   362,440 

Dividends declared

   (176,137  (195,265  (190,002

Other

   —     2,126   —   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at end of fiscal year

   89,432   746,785   918,894 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax (Note 17):

    

Balance at beginning of fiscal year, previously reported

   1,117,877   2,041,005   1,469,308 

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles (Notes 2 and 25)

   —     —     330 

Balance at beginning of fiscal year, adjusted

   1,117,877   2,041,005   1,469,638 

Change during year

   923,128   (571,697  51,525 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at end of fiscal year

   2,041,005   1,469,308   1,521,163 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Treasury stock, at cost:

    

Balance at beginning of fiscal year

   (3,874  (3,616  (3,610

Purchases of treasury stock

   (274  (653  (1,903

Disposal of treasury stock

   532   659   663 

Cancellation of treasury stock

   —     —     1 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at end of fiscal year

   (3,616  (3,610  (4,849
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total MHFG shareholders’ equity

   7,930,338  ��8,014,551   8,261,357 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

See the accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY—(Continued)

FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2015, 2016 AND 2017

  2015 2016 2017   2017 2018 2019 
  (in millions of yen)   (in millions of yen) 

Preferred stock:

    

Balance at beginning of fiscal year

   98,924   —     —   

Conversion to common stock

   (98,924  —     —   
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at end of fiscal year

   —     —     —   
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Common stock:

    

Balance at beginning of fiscal year

   5,703,144  5,826,149  5,826,383 

Issuance of new shares of common stock due to conversion of preferred stock

   98,924   —     —   

Issuance of new shares of common stock due to exercise of stock acquisition rights

   969  546  438 

Performance-based stock compensation program

   (655 (326 (282

Other

   23,767  14  3,118 
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at end of fiscal year

   5,826,149  5,826,383  5,829,657 
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Retained earnings:

    

Balance at beginning of fiscal year, previously reported

   746,785  918,894  1,306,141 

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles, net of tax (Note 2)

   (329  —    1,540,317 

Balance at beginning of fiscal year, adjusted

   746,456  918,894  2,846,458 

Net income attributable to MHFG shareholders

   362,440  577,608  84,471 

Dividends declared

   (190,002 (190,361 (190,384
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at end of fiscal year

   918,894  1,306,141  2,740,545 
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax (Note 17):

    

Balance at beginning of fiscal year, previously reported

   1,469,308  1,521,163  1,741,894 

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles (Note 2)

   330   —    (1,535,142

Balance at beginning of fiscal year, adjusted

   1,469,638  1,521,163  206,752 

Change during year

   51,525  220,731  (42,731
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at end of fiscal year

   1,521,163  1,741,894  164,021 
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Treasury stock, at cost:

    

Balance at beginning of fiscal year

   (3,610 (4,849 (5,997

Purchases of treasury stock

   (1,903 (2,431 (3,002

Disposal of treasury stock

   663  1,283  1,295 

Cancellation of treasury stock

   1   —     —   
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at end of fiscal year

   (4,849 (5,997 (7,704
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total MHFG shareholders’ equity

   8,261,357  8,868,421  8,726,519 
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Noncontrolling interests:

        

Balance at beginning of fiscal year, previously reported

   242,901  259,506  168,640    168,640  510,700  635,279 

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles (Notes 2 and 25)

   —     —    (10,441

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles

   (10,441  —    (616

Balance at beginning of fiscal year, adjusted

   242,901  259,506  158,199    158,199  510,700  634,663 

Effect of other increase (decrease) in consolidated subsidiaries

   (6,128 (85,809 328,692 

Transactions between the MHFG Group and the noncontrolling interest shareholders

   328,692  106,740  166,145 

Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests

   (3,936 (2,683 (2,914   (2,914 (8,054 (16,874

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

   27,185  (429 26,691    26,691  24,086  (8,746

Net unrealized gains (losses) onavailable-for-sale securities attributable to noncontrolling interests

   (1,360 (674 29 

Foreign currency translation adjustments attributable to noncontrolling interests

   686  (352 (62

Pension liability adjustments attributable to noncontrolling interests

   158  (919 65 

Other

   32  1,807  (214
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at end of fiscal year

   259,506  168,640  510,700    510,700  635,279  774,974 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total equity

   8,189,844  8,183,191  8,772,057    8,772,057  9,503,700  9,501,493 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

Note:

The amounts that have been reclassified out of Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax into net income are presented in Note 17 “Accumulated other comprehensive income”.

See the accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2017, 2018 AND 2019

   2017  2018  2019 
   

 

(in millions of yen)

 

Cash flows from operating activities:

    

Net income

   389,131   601,694   75,725 

Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

   26,691   24,086   (8,746
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income attributable to MHFG shareholders

   362,440   577,608   84,471 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:

    

Depreciation and amortization

   171,202   179,158   355,164 

Provision (credit) for loan losses

   37,668   (126,362  32,459 

Investment losses (gains)—net

   (333,270  (297,157  159,789 

Equity in losses (earnings) of equity method investees—net

   (26,785  (24,342  (29,172

Foreign exchange losses (gains)—net

   22,812   (251,613  155,104 

Deferred income tax expense (benefit)

   (107,432  60,011   (157,231

Net change in trading account assets

   4,867,508   992,084   2,776,764 

Net change in trading account liabilities

   (3,267,060  (518,339  (2,979,299

Net change in loans held for sale

   (5,574  (54,530  26,659 

Net change in accrued income

   7,087   (31,842  (44,519

Net change in accrued expenses

   4,485   16,517   45,653 

Other—net

   (523,954  (682,269  235,177 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

   1,209,127   (161,076  661,019 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities:

    

Proceeds from sales ofAvailable-for-sale securities (1)

   31,139,716   32,908,551   21,132,162 

Proceeds from sales of Equity securities (2)

   —     —     3,973,437 

Proceeds from maturities ofAvailable-for-sale securities (1)

   7,100,083   13,819,828   15,673,340 

Proceeds from maturities ofHeld-to-maturity securities

   999,405   1,261,607   939,397 

Purchases ofAvailable-for-sale securities (1)

   (34,133,416  (49,722,644  (34,327,798

Purchases ofHeld-to-maturity securities

   (3,854  (2,982  (2,042

Purchases of Equity securities (2)

   —     —     (3,429,923

Proceeds from sales of loans

   291,782   296,260   1,184,160 

Net change in loans

   (5,606,627  (1,971,210  (3,852,757

Net change in call loans and funds sold, and receivables under resale agreements and securities borrowing transactions

   (1,481,661  54,786   (2,971,007

Proceeds from sales of premises and equipment

   12,059   22,302   7,812 

Purchases of premises and equipment

   (430,913  (292,201  (157,714

Cash and cash equivalents acquired in business combination

   1,095   —     —   

Proceeds from sales of investments in subsidiaries (affecting the scope of consolidation)

   —     948   220 

Cash outflow from deconsolidation of a subsidiary(3)

   —     —     (4,943,059
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

   (2,112,331  (3,624,755  (6,773,772
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities:

    

Net change in deposits

   14,005,565   6,083,800   3,065,826 

Net change in call money and funds purchased, and payables under repurchase agreements and securities lending transactions

   (771,368  (67,508  1,703,606 

Net change in due to trust accounts

   (344,217  (130,544  (59,373

Net change in other short-term borrowings

   (589,512  257,774   270,560 

Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt

   4,496,041   1,956,007   1,659,412 

Repayment of long-term debt

   (4,734,010  (3,310,804  (3,241,799

Proceeds from noncontrolling interests

   3,323   76,894   219,187 

Payments to noncontrolling interests

   (1,696  (12,949  (579

Proceeds from issuance of common stock

   6   3   3 

Proceeds from sales of treasury stock

   1   1   953 

Purchases of treasury stock

   (1,435  (1,611  (2,124

Dividends paid

   (190,031  (190,382  (190,413

Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests

   (2,914  (8,054  (16,874
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash provided by financing activities

   11,869,753   4,652,627   3,408,385 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

   (29,583  (282,846  206,186 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

   10,936,966   583,950   (2,498,182

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of fiscal year

   36,650,005   47,586,971   48,170,921 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of fiscal year

   47,586,971   48,170,921   45,672,739 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

See the accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2015, 2016 AND 2017

   2015  2016  2017 
   (in millions of yen) 

Cash flows from operating activities:

    

Net income

   830,233   850,063   389,131 

Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

   27,185   (429  26,691 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income attributable to MHFG shareholders

   803,048   850,492   362,440 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:

    

Depreciation and amortization

   166,528   167,930   171,202 

Provision (credit) for loan losses

   (60,223  34,560   37,668 

Investment losses (gains)—net

   (271,174  (263,793  (333,270

Equity in losses (earnings) of equity method investees—net

   (17,502  (28,969  (26,785

Foreign exchange losses (gains)—net

   357,103   (225,130  22,812 

Deferred income tax expense (benefit)

   181,990   123,125   (107,432

Net change in trading account assets

   (2,121,400  (778,204  4,867,508 

Net change in trading account liabilities

   1,333,577   916,958   (3,267,060

Net change in loans held for sale

   56,549   (27,347  (5,574

Net change in accrued income

   (7,531  (2,441  7,087 

Net change in accrued expenses

   87,157   (26,425  4,485 

Other—net

   697,804   (499,046  (519,773
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

   1,205,926   241,710   1,213,308 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities:

    

Proceeds from sales of investments

   58,629,117   19,830,288   31,139,716 

Proceeds from maturities of investments

   6,107,552   8,669,730   8,099,488 

Purchases of investments

   (61,507,248  (25,046,188  (34,137,270

Proceeds from sales of loans

   651,339   197,898   291,782 

Net change in loans

   (2,800,196  (1,923,627  (5,606,627

Net change in interest-bearing deposits in other banks

   (8,189,150  (7,750,251  (10,688,447

Net change in call loans and funds sold, and receivables under resale agreements and securities borrowing transactions

   1,813,089   385,134   (1,481,661

Proceeds from sales of premises and equipment

   41,521   47,506   12,059 

Purchases of premises and equipment

   (419,912  (388,565  (430,913

Cash and due from banks acquired in business combination

   —     —     301 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

   (5,673,888  (5,978,075  (12,801,572
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities:

    

Net change in deposits

   9,460,669   5,441,731   14,005,565 

Net change in call money and funds purchased, and payables under repurchase agreements and securities lending transactions

   (5,376,701  (3,900,502  (771,368

Net change in due to trust accounts

   499,065   3,226,204   (344,217

Net change in other short-term borrowings

   (4,480,378  571,901   (589,512

Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt

   6,537,703   2,723,168   4,496,041 

Repayment of long-term debt

   (2,196,492  (2,307,082  (4,734,010

Proceeds from noncontrolling interests

   891   1,354   3,323 

Payments to noncontrolling interests

   (1  (86  —   

Proceeds from issuance of common stock

   6   5   6 

Proceeds from sales of treasury stock

   3   3   1 

Purchases of treasury stock

   (12  (13  (1,435

Purchases of treasury stock of subsidiaries

   —     —     (1,696

Dividends paid

   (176,186  (195,283  (190,031

Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests

   (3,936  (2,683  (2,914
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash provided by financing activities

   4,264,631   5,558,717   11,869,753 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and due from banks

   34,758   (28,061  (11,895
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and due from banks

   (168,573  (205,709  269,594 

Cash and due from banks at beginning of fiscal year

   1,696,879   1,528,306   1,322,597 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash and due from banks at end of fiscal year

   1,528,306   1,322,597   1,592,191 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

See the accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS—(Continued)

FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2015, 20162017, 2018 AND 20172019

 

  2015   2016   2017   2017   2018   2019 
  (in millions of yen)   

 

(in millions of yen)

 

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

            

Interest paid

   419,070    435,584    582,947    582,947    818,593    1,268,412 

Income taxes paid

   172,022    269,364    246,802    246,802    172,891    175,615 

Noncash investing activities:

            

Transfer of loans into other investments

   2,414    63,420    —   

Transfer of loans into loansheld-for-sale

   18,739    35,166    2,728 

Investment in capital leases

   8,184    16,123    12,467    12,467    6,586    871 

Noncash assets acquired and liabilities assumed at fair value in business combination (Note 3):

            

Noncash assets acquired at fair value

   —      —      93,049    80,176    —      —   

Noncash Liabilities assumed at fair value

   —      —      25,893 

Noncash liabilities assumed at fair value

   25,893    —      —   

Deconsolidation of Trust & Custody Services Bank Ltd (Note 1):

      

Decrease in total assets

   —      —      8,990,604 

of which Cash and cash equivalents

   —      —      4,943,059 

Decrease in total liabilities

   —      —      8,958,535 

of which Due to trust accounts

   —      —      3,620,825 

Noncash assets acquired at fair value in an equity method investee(3)

   —      —      25,311 

Notes:

(1)

Proceeds from sales and maturities ofAvailable-for-sale securities as well as Purchases ofAvailable-for-sale securities include cash activity related to Other investments for the fiscal years ended March 31 2017 and 2018, the amounts of which are not significant.

(2)

Proceeds from sales of Equity securities as well as Purchases of Equity securities include cash activity related to Other investments for the fiscal year ended March 31 2019, the amounts of which are not significant.

(3)

The cash outflow was from deconsolidation of a subsidiary. See Note 1 “Basis of presentation and summary of significant accounting policies” for further details.

 

 

See the accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. Basis of presentation and summary of significant accounting policies

Basis of presentation

Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (“MHFG”) is a joint stock corporation with limited liability under the laws of Japan. MHFG is a holding company for Mizuho Bank, Ltd. (“MHBK”), Mizuho Trust & Banking Co., Ltd. (“MHTB”), Mizuho Securities Co., Ltd. (“MHSC”), Trust & Custody Services Bank, Ltd. (“TCSB”), Asset Management One Co., Ltd. (“Asset Management One”), and other subsidiaries.MHFG, through its subsidiaries (“the MHFG Group”, or “the Group”), provides domestic and international financial services in Japan and other countries. The MHFG Group has introduced anin-house company system based on its diverse customer segments as of April 2016. See Note 32 “Business segment information” for further discussion of the Group’s segment information.

TheMHFG and its domestic subsidiaries as well as its foreign subsidiaries maintain their accounting records in accordance with the accounting standards of Japan and those standards of the countries in which they are domiciled. Certain adjustments and reclassifications have been incorporated in the accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance withto conform them to the accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). The consolidated financial statements are stated in Japanese yen, the currency of the country in which MHFG is incorporated and principally operates.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of MHFG and its subsidiaries. MHFG’s fiscal year ends on March 31 and the fiscal year of certain subsidiaries ends on December 31. The necessary adjustments have been made to the consolidated financial statements if significant transactions took place during the three-month period. When determining whether to consolidate investee entities, the MHFG Group performed a carefulan analysis of the facts and circumstances of the particular relationships between the MHFG Group and the investee entities as well as the ownership of voting shares. The consolidated financial statements also include the accounts of the VIEs for which MHFG or its subsidiaries have been determined to be the primary beneficiary in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 810, “Consolidation” (“ASC 810”). All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated upon consolidation. The MHFG Group accounts for investments in entities over which it has significant influence by using the equity method of accounting. These investments are included in Other investments and the Group’s proportionate share of income or loss is included in Equity in earnings (losses) of equity method investees—net.

The amounts of asset management business fee income and expenses for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 have been reclassified from Other noninterest income and Other noninterest expenses to Fee and commission income and Fee and commission expenses, respectively, in order to conform to the current period’s presentation. Such reclassifications had no effect on net income or shareholders’ equity. In addition, certain other comparative amounts for the prior period have been reclassified in order to conform to the current period’s presentation.

Use of estimates

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts and related disclosures. Specific areas, among others, requiring the application of management’s estimates and judgment include assumptions pertaining to the allowance for loan losses, allowance for losses onoff-balance-sheet instruments, deferred tax assets, derivative financial instruments, investments and pension and other employee benefits. Actual results could differ from estimates and assumptions made.

DefinitionDeconsolidation of cashTCSB

In March 2018, Trust & Custody Services Bank, Ltd. (“TCSB”), MHFG’s former subsidiary, and due from banksJapan Trustee Services Bank, Ltd. (“JTSB”) entered into a management integration agreement. Based on the agreement, TCSB

For purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows, Cash and due from banks includes cash on hand, cash items in the process of collection and noninterest-bearing deposits with banks.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

and JTSB incorporated a holding company, JTC Holdings, Ltd. (“JTC Holdings”) through joint share transfer on October 1, 2018, and became wholly-owned subsidiaries of JTC Holdings on that date. Starting October 1, 2018, MHFG has no longer consolidated TCSB, which had approximately ¥14 trillion and ¥9 trillion, respectively, in total assets as of March 31, 2018 and September 30, 2018. However, MHFG has maintained 27.0% of the voting equity interests in JTC Holdings and accounted for this investment using the equity method of accounting. There was no material effect from TCSB deconsolidation on the accompanying consolidated statement of income for the year ended March 31, 2019.

Definition of cash and cash equivalents

For purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows, Cash and cash equivalents consists of Cash and due from banks and Interest-bearing deposits in other banks. Cash deposited with central banks that must be maintained to meet minimum regulatory requirements is classified as restricted cash and included in Cash and cash equivalents. See Note 9 “Pledged assets and collateral” for more information on restricted cash.

The MHFG Group adopted ASUNo.2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic230)—Restricted Cash” (“ASUNo.2016-18”) using the retrospective approach. In accordance with the adoption, the MHFG Group changed the definition of cash and cash equivalents as mentioned above. As a result of the adoption of the ASUNo.2016-18, the MHFG Group recorded decreases of ¥4,181 million and ¥3,415 million in Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2017 and 2018, respectively, and increases of ¥10,689,241 million and ¥762,722 million in Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2017 and 2018, respectively.

Translation of foreign currency financial statements and foreign currency transactions

Financial statements of overseas entities are prepared using the functional currency of each entity and translated into Japanese yen for consolidation purposes. Assets and liabilities are translated using thefiscal-year-end exchange rate of each functional currency, and income and expenses are translated using the average rate of each functional currency for the period.

Foreign currency translation gains and losses related to the financial statements of overseas entities of the MHFG Group, net of related income tax effects, are credited or charged directly to Foreign currency translation adjustments, a component of Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax (“AOCI”). The tax effects of gains and losses related to the foreign currency translation of financial statements of overseas entities are not recognized unless it is apparent that the temporary differences will reverse in the foreseeable future.

Assets and liabilities of domestic and overseas entities denominated in foreign currencies are translatedremeasured into Japanese yenthe functional currency of the respective entity at the fiscalfiscal-year-endyear-end foreign exchange rates, and gains and losses resulting from such translationremeasurement are included in Foreign exchange gains (losses)—net. Foreign currency denominated income and expenses are translatedremeasured using the average exchange rates for the period.

Call loans and call money

Call loans and call money represent lending/borrowing, primarily through the Japanese short-term money market, to/from other financial institutions such as banks, insurance companies, and securities brokerage houses.

Repurchase and resale agreements, securities lending and borrowing and other secured financing transactions

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase (“repurchase agreements”), securities purchased under agreements to resell (“resale agreements”) and securities lending and borrowing transactions are accounted for as

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

secured financing or lending transactions when control over the underlying securities is not deemed to be surrendered by the transferor. Otherwise, they are recorded as sales of securities with related forward repurchase commitments or purchases of securities with related forward resale commitments in accordance with ASC 860, “Transfers and Servicing” (“ASC 860”).

Under resale agreements, securities borrowing and certain derivatives transactions, the MHFG Group receives collateral in the form of securities. In many cases, the MHFG Group is permitted to sell or repledge the securities obtained as collateral. Disclosures in respect of such collateral are presented in Note 9 “Pledged assets and collateral”. With respect to repurchase agreements, securities lending, and certain derivative transactions, counterparties may have the right to sell or repledge securities that the MHFG Group has pledged as collateral. The MHFG Group separately discloses these pledged securities in the consolidated balance sheets.

The MHFG Group monitors credit exposure arising from resale agreements, repurchase agreements, securities borrowing and securities lending transactions on a dailyregular basis, and additional collateral is obtained from or returned to counterparties, as appropriate.

Trading securities and trading securities sold, not yet purchased

Trading securities consist of securities and money market instruments that are bought and held principally for the purpose of reselling in the near term with the objective of generating profits on short-term fluctuations in price. Trading securities sold, not yet purchased, are securities and money market instruments sold to third parties that the MHFG Group does not own and is obligated to purchase at a later date to cover the short position. Trading

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

securities and trading securities sold, not yet purchased, are recorded on the trade date. Trading securities and trading securities sold, not yet purchased, are recorded at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets in Trading account assets and Trading account liabilities with realized and unrealized gains and losses recorded on a trade date basis in Trading account gains (losses)—net in the consolidated statements of income. Interest and dividends on trading securities, including securities sold, not yet purchased, are recorded in Interest and dividend income or Interest expense on an accrual basis.

Investments

Debt securities that the MHFG Group has both the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are classified asHeld-to-maturity securities and carried at amortized cost. Debt securities that the MHFG Group may not hold to maturity, and any marketable equity securities, other than those classified as trading securities, are classified asAvailable-for-sale securities, and are carried at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses reported in AOCI. Equity securities that do not meet the classification of trading securities are measured at fair value with unrealized gains and losses reported in Investment gains (losses)—net Equity securities.

The credit component of an other-than-temporary impairment of a debt security is reported in Investment gains (losses)—net, and the noncredit component is reported in Other comprehensive income (loss). See Note 4 “Investments” for further discussion of impairment. Interest and dividends, as well as amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts, are reported in Interest and dividend income. Amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts on debt securities are recognized over their remaining maturities under the interest method. Gains and losses on disposition of investments are computed using thefirst-infirst-out method for debt securities and the average method for equity securities, and are recorded on the trade date.

Other investments include marketable andnon-marketable equity securities accounted for using the equity method and marketable andnon-marketable investments held by consolidated investment companies carried at fair value under specialized industry accounting principles for investment companies, and othernon-marketable equity securities carried at cost, less other-than-temporary impairment, if any.companies.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Derivative financial instruments

Derivative financial instruments are bought and held principally for the purpose of market making for customers, proprietary trading in order to generate trading revenues and fee income, and also to manage the MHFG Group’s exposure to interest rate, credit and market risks related to asset and liability management. Such derivative financial instruments include interest rate, foreign currency, equity, commodity and credit default swap agreements, options, caps and floors, and financial futures and forward contracts.

Derivatives bought and held for trading purposes are recorded in the consolidated balance sheets at fair value in Trading account assets and Trading account liabilities. The fair values of derivatives in a gain position and a loss position are reported as Trading account assets and Trading account liabilities, respectively.

Derivatives used for asset and liability management include contracts that qualify for hedge accounting under ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging” (“ASC 815”). To be eligible for hedge accounting, derivative instruments must be highly effective in achieving offsetting changes in fair values or variable cash flows of the hedged items attributable to the particular risk being hedged. All qualifying hedging derivatives are valued at fair value and included in Trading account assets or Trading account liabilities. Derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting under ASC 815 are treated as trading positions and are accounted for as such. The fair value amounts recognized for all derivatives are presented on a gross basis and not offset against the amounts recognized for the right to reclaim cash collateral or the obligation to return cash collateral under the master netting agreement with the same counterparty.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The fair values of derivative financial instruments are determined based on quoted market prices or broker-dealer quotes, if available. If not available, the fair values are estimated using quoted market prices for similar instruments, option or binomial pricing models or a present value cash flow analysis, utilizing current observable market information, where available. In determining the fair values, the Group considers various factors such as exchange orover-the-counter market quotes, time value of money and volatility factors for options and warrants, observed prices for similar or synthetic instruments, and counterparty credit quality including potential exposure.

Changes in the fair values of all derivatives are recorded in earnings, except for derivatives qualifying as net investment hedges under ASC 815 which are recorded in AOCI. The changes in the fair values of all derivatives relating to foreign currency exchange rates are included in Foreign exchange gains (losses)—net and Trading account gains (losses)—net. Other elements of the changes in the fair values, including interest rate, equity and credit related components, except these of certain credit derivatives hedging the credit risk in the corporate loan portfolio, are recognized in Trading account gains (losses)—net. The net gain (loss) resulting from changes in the fair values of certain credit derivatives where the Group purchases protection to mitigate its credit risk exposure related to its corporate loan portfolio is recorded in Other noninterest income (expenses).

Certain financial and hybrid instruments often contain embedded derivative instruments that possess implicit or explicit contract terms similar to those of a derivative instrument. Such derivative instruments are required to be fair-valued separately from the host contracts if they meet the bifurcation criteria of an embedded derivative. Such criteria include that the entire instrument is not marked to market through earnings, the economic characteristics and risks of the embedded contract terms are not clearly and closely related to those of the host contract and the embedded contract terms would meet the definition of a derivative on a stand-alone basis.

Loans

Loans are generally carried at the principal amount adjusted for unearned income and deferred net nonrefundable loan fees and costs. Loan origination fees, net of certain direct origination costs, are deferred and recognized over

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

the contractual life of the loan as an adjustment of yield using a method that approximates the interest method. Interest income on performing loans is accrued and credited to income as it is earned. Unearned income and discounts or premiums on purchased loans are deferred and recognized over the life of the loan using a method that approximates the interest method.

Loans are considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the MHFG Group will be unable to collect all the scheduled payments of principal and interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loans. Factors considered by management in determining if a loan is impaired include delinquency status and the ability of the debtor to make payments of the principal and interest when due. Impaired loans include loans past due for 90 days or more and restructured loans that meet the definition of a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) in accordance with ASC 310, “Receivables” (“ASC 310”).

All of the MHFG Group’s impaired loans are designated as nonaccrual loans and thus interest accruals and the amortization of net origination fees are suspended and capitalized interest is written off. Cash received on nonaccrual loans is accounted for as a reduction of the loan principal if the ultimate collectibility of the principal amount is uncertain,in doubt, otherwise, as interest income. Loans are not restored to accrual status until interest and principal payments are current and future payments are reasonably assured. Impaired loans are restored tonon-impaired loans and accrual status, when the MHFG Group determines that the borrower poses no concerns regarding current certainty of debt fulfillment. In general, such determination is made if the borrower qualifies for an obligor rating of E2 or above and is not classified as a special attention obligor. With respect to loans restructured in a TDR, in general, such loans are restored tonon-impaired loans, and accrual status, when the borrower qualifies for an obligor rating of D or above. See Note 5 “Loans” for the definitions of obligor ratings.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Loans that have been identified for sale are classified as loans held for sale within Other assets and are accounted for at the lower of cost or fair value on an individual loan basis. If management decides to retain certain loans held for sale for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff, such items are transferred to Loans at the lower of cost or fair value.

Allowance and provision (credit) for loan losses

The MHFG Group maintains an appropriate allowance for loan losses to absorb probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio and makes adjustments to such allowance through Provision (credit) for loan losses in the consolidated statements of income. Loan principal that management judges to be uncollectible, based on detailed loan reviews and a credit quality assessment, is charged off against the allowance for loan losses. In general, the MHFG Group charges off loans when the Group determines that the obligor should be classified as substantially bankrupt or bankrupt. See Note 5 “Loans” for the definitions of obligor categories. Obligors in the retail portfolio segment are generally determined to be substantially bankrupt when they are past due for more than six months, and as for obligors in the corporate and other obligors,portfolio segments, the Group separately monitors the credit quality of each obligor without using time-based triggers. Subsequent recoveries of previouslycharged-off loan balances are recorded as an increase to the allowance for loan losses as the recoveries are received.

TheFor the corporate portfolio segment, the credit quality review process and the credit rating process serve as the basis for determining the allowance for loan losses. Through such processes loans are categorized into groups to reflect the probability of default, whereby the MHFG Group’s management assesses the ability of borrowers to service their debt, taking into consideration current financial information, ability to generate cash, historical payment experience, analysis of relevant industry segments and current trends. InFor the retail portfolio segment, the different categories of past due status of loans are primarily utilized in the credit quality review and the credit rating processes as the basis for determining the appropriate level ofallowance for loan losses. MHFG Group’s accounting policies

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

and the methodology used to estimate the allowance for loan losses for the MHFG Group evaluatesother portfolio segment are equivalent to the probable loss by category of loan based on its risk typepolicies and characteristics.methodology used for the corporate portfolio segment.

The allowance for loan losses is determined in accordance with ASC 310 and ASC 450, “Contingencies” (“ASC 450”). The MHFG Group measures the impairment of a loan when it is probable that the Group will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement, based on (1) the present value of expected future cash flows, after considering the restructuring effect and subsequent payment default with respect to TDRs, discounted at the loan’s initial effective interest rate, or (2) the loan’s observable market price, or (3) the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. The collateral that the Group obtains for loans consists primarily of real estate or listed securities.estate. In obtaining the collateral, the Group evaluates the fair value of the collateral and its legal enforceability. The Group also performs subsequentre-evaluations at least once a year. As it pertains to real estate collateral, valuation is generally performed by an appraising subsidiary which is independent from the Group’s loan origination departments by using generally accepted valuation techniques such as (1) the replacement cost approach, or (2) the sales comparison approach or (3) the income approach. In the case of large real estate collateral, the Group generally engages third-party appraisers to perform the valuation. As it pertains to listed securities collateral, observable market prices are used for valuation.

The formula allowance is applied to groups of small balance, homogeneous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment and tonon-homogeneous loans that have not been identified as impaired.impairment. The evaluation of the inherent loss in respect of these loans involves a high degree of uncertainty, subjectivity and judgment because probable loan losses are not easily identifiable or measurable. In determining the formula allowance, the MHFG Group therefore relies on a statistical analysis that incorporates loss rates based on its own historical loss experience and third-party data such as the number of corporate default cases which is updated once a year. In determining the allowance amount, the Group analyzes (1) the probability of default: (a) by using the most recently available data sincefrom April 2008 for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017 for the

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

corporate portfolio segment, which resulted in using the data for the past seven, eight and nine years, respectively, and the most recently available data for the past six years for the retail portfolio segment, respectively, in the case of normal obligors; and (b) by using the most recently available data sincefrom April 2002 for the corporate and retail portfolio segments, in the case of watch obligors; and (2) the loss given default by using the most recently available data for the past six years.years for the corporate and retail portfolio segments. As it pertains to TDR loans in the retail portfolio segment, which are subject to collective evaluation for impairment, the restructuring itself, as well as subsequent payment defaults, if any, are considered in determining obligor ratings.categories.

The historical loss rate is adjusted, where appropriate, to reflect current factors, such as general economic and business conditions affecting the key lending areas of the MHFG Group, credit quality trends, specific industry conditions withinby portfolio segments, and recent loss experience in particular segments of the portfolio. When determining the length of the period to calculate the probability of default, the Group considers the uncertainty in the economic and business conditions. The estimation of the formula allowance is back-tested on a periodic basis by comparing the allowance with the actual results subsequent to the balance sheet date.

Allowance and provision (credit) for losses onoff-balance-sheet instruments

The MHFG Group maintains an allowance for losses onoff-balance-sheet credit instruments, such as guarantees and standby letters of credit in the same manner as the allowance for loan losses. The Group similarly assesses probable loss amounts for commitments to invest in securities and commitments to extend credit, intaking into account the same manner as the allowance for loan losses.probability of drawdowns. The allowance is recorded in Other liabilities. Net changes in the allowance for losses onoff-balance-sheet instruments are accounted for in Provision (credit) for losses onoff-balance-sheet instruments in the consolidated statements of income.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Premises and equipment

Premises and equipment are stated at historical cost, and depreciation and amortization are recorded over the estimated useful lives of the assets, except for leasehold improvements, which are amortized over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the lease term. Depreciation and amortization are principally computed in accordance with the straight-line method with respect to buildings and leasehold improvements and in accordance with the declining-balance method with respect to other premises and equipment.

The useful lives of premises and equipment are as follows:

 

   Years 

Buildings

   3 to 50 

Equipment and furniture

   2 to 20 

Leasehold improvements

   3 to 50 

Regular repairs and maintenance costs that do not extend the estimated useful life of an asset are charged to expense as incurred. Upon sale or disposition of premises and equipment, the cost and related accumulated depreciation or amortization are removed from the accounts, and any gains or losses on disposal are included in Gains on disposal of premises and equipment or Occupancy expenses.

Impairment of long-lived assets

The MHFG Group’s long-lived assets that are held for use are reviewed periodically for events or changes in circumstances that indicate possible impairment. The Group’s impairment review is based on an undiscounted cash flow analysis of a group of assets, combined with associated liabilities, at the lowest level for which

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

identifiable cash flows exist. Impairment occurs when the carrying value of the asset group exceeds the future undiscounted cash flows that the asset group is expected to generate. When impairment is identified, the future cash flows are then discounted to determine the estimated fair value of the asset group and an impairment charge is recorded for the difference between the carrying value and the estimated fair value of the asset group. The long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale are carried at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value, less estimated cost to sell.

Software

Internal and external costs incurred in connection with developing and obtaining software for internal use during the application development stage are capitalized. Such costs include salaries and benefits for employees directly involved with and who devote time to the project, to the extent such time is incurred directly on the internal use software project. The capitalization of software ceases when the software project has been substantially completed. The capitalized software is amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life, generally 5 to 10 years. Internal use software is reviewed for impairment when triggeringwhenever events occur.or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable.

Goodwill

Goodwill represents the excess of the total fair value of the acquired company, which consists of the consideration transferred, the fair value of any interest in the acquiree already held by the acquirer and the fair value of any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree over the fair value of net identifiable assets acquired at the date of acquisition in a business combination. The MHFG Group accounts for goodwill in accordance with ASC 350, “Intangibles—Goodwill and Other” (“ASC 350”). Goodwill is recorded at a designated reporting unit

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

level for the purpose of assessing impairment. Goodwill is not amortized but is tested for impairment at least annually or more often if events or circumstances indicate there may be impairment. For both the annual and interim tests, the Group has the option to either (a) perform a quantitative impairment test or (b) first perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, in which case the Group would perform the quantitative test. An impairment loss is recorded to the extent the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its estimated fair value. The estimated fair value of the reporting units is derived based on valuation techniques that the Group believes market participants would use for each of the reporting units. The Group generally determines the estimated fair value by utilizing a discounted cash flow methodology or methodologies that incorporateprice-to-book multiples of certain comparable companies.

Intangible assets

Intangible assets having definite useful lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives on either a straight-line basis or the method that reflects the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible assets are consumed. Intangible assets acquired in connection with the merger of MHSC and Shinko Securities Co., Ltd. (“Shinko”) and the integration among asset management companies consist primarily of customer relationship intangibles, and are amortized over weighted-average amortization periods of 16 years and 16.9 years, respectively. See Note 3 “Business Combination” for further details of the integration among asset management companies. Intangible assets having indefinite useful lives are not amortized and are subject to impairment tests. An impairment loss is recorded to the extent that the carrying amount of the indefinite-lived intangible asset exceeds its estimated fair value. For intangible assets subject to amortization, an impairment loss is recorded if the carrying amount is not recoverable and exceeds its estimated fair value.

Pension and other employee benefits

MHFG and certain subsidiaries sponsor severance indemnities and pension plans, which provide defined benefits to retired employees. Periodic expense and accrued liabilities are computed based on the actuarial present value of benefits, net of investment returns expected from plan assets and their fair values at the balance sheet date. Net periodic expense is charged to Salaries and employee benefits. Net actuarial gains and losses that arise from differences between actual experience and assumptions are generally amortized over the average remaining service period of participating employees if they exceed the corridor, which is defined as the greater of 10% of plan assets or the projected benefit obligation.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Stock-based compensation

TheMHFG, MHBK, MHTB and MHSC have a position-based stock compensation cost with regard to stock options is measured at fair value using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.

The compensation cost with regard to theprogram for Directors (“Stock Compensation I”) and a performance-based stock compensation program for Directors (“Stock Compensation II”). For both programs, the stock-based compensation cost is determined based uponon the fair value of the shares of MHFGMHFG’s common stock as of grant date. For Stock Compensation I and II, the liability related to the cash-based compensation cost is remeasured at each reporting date based on the fair value of MHFG’s common stock. For Stock Compensation II, the stock-based compensation costs are recognized evenly over the graded-vesting period, which is three years. For Stock Compensation I, as the program is effectively vested on the grant date, andthe stock-based compensation cost is recognized overon the three year deferral period on a straight-line basis.grant date.

See Note 22 “Stock-based compensation” for further details of the stock options and the performance-based stock compensation.compensation programs.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Long-term debt

Premiums, discounts and issuance costs of long-term debt are amortized based on a method that approximates the interest method over the respective terms of the long-term debt.

Obligations under guarantees

The MHFG Group provides customers with a variety of guarantees and similar arrangements, including standby letters of credit, financial and performance guarantees, credit protection, and liquidity facilities. The MHFG Group recognizes guarantee fee income over the guarantee period. The MHFG Group receives such a guarantee fee at the inception of the guarantee or in installments and, in either case, the present value of the total fees approximates the fair value of the guarantee.

Fair Value Measurements

The MHFG Group carries certain of its financial assets and liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis. These financial assets and liabilities are primarily composed of trading account assets, trading account liabilities andavailable-for-sale securities. In addition, the Group measures certain financial assets and liabilities, at fair value on anon-recurring basis. Those assets and liabilities primarily include items that are measured at the lower of cost or fair value such as loans held for sale, and items that were initially measured at cost and have been written down to fair value due to impairments, such as loans and other investments.equity securities without readily determinable fair values.

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In accordance with ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurement” (“ASC 820”), the Group classifies its financial assets and liabilities into the fair value hierarchy (Level 1, 2, and 3). See Note 28 “Fair value” for the detailed definition of each level.

When determining fair value, the MHFG Group considers the principal or most advantageous market in which the Group would transact and considers assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability. The Group maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. See Note 28 “Fair value” for descriptions of valuation methodologies used for its assets and liabilities by product.

Fee and commission income

FeeThe MHFG Group recognizes revenue from contracts with customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the Group expects to be entitled in exchange for transferring control of a promised service. The timing of revenue recognition is recognized when alldependent on whether the Group satisfies a performance obligation by transferring control of the following criteria have been met: persuasive evidenceservice to a customer over time or at a point in time. See Note 26 “Noninterest income” for further details of an agreement exists, services have been rendered, the price is fixed or determinable,major components of Fee and collectibility is reasonably assured. Fees in respect of securities-related business and fees on funds transfer and collection services are generally recognized as revenue when the related services are performed. Fees on credit-related business, excluding loan origination fees which are deferred and recognized over the loan period as a yield adjustment, are generally

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

recognized either at one time when the service is rendered or over the related transaction period.commission income. Fee and commission income is presented on a gross basis and exclusive of consumption taxes.

Income taxes

Income taxes are accounted for in accordance with ASC 740, “Income Taxes” (“ASC 740”). Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of (1) temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the corresponding amounts used for income tax purposes, and (2) operating

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

loss and tax credit carryforwards. A valuation allowance is recorded for any portion of the deferred tax assets unless it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will be realized. Deferred income tax benefit or expense is recognized for the changes in the net deferred tax asset or liability between periods.

Earnings per common share

Basic earnings per common share are computed by dividing net income attributable to MHFG common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the fiscal year. Diluted earnings per common share reflect the possible exercise of all convertible securities,dilutive potential common shares such as stock options and convertible preferred stock to the extent they are not anti-dilutive.stock. See Note 19 “Earnings per common share” for the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share.

2. Recently issued accounting pronouncements

Recently adopted accounting pronouncements

In June 2013,May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”)ASUNo.2013-08,No.2014-09, “Financial Services—Investment Companies“Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 946)—Amendments to the Scope, Measurement, and Disclosure Requirements”606)” (“ASUNo.2013-08”No.2014-09”). The ASU, changesas amended, provides comprehensive guidance in respect of revenue recognition, in convergence with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”), to improve financial reporting in U.S. GAAP by replacing the approachcurrent complex guidance for recognizing revenue. The core principle of this ASU is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the investment company assessment and requirestransfer of promised goods or services to customers in an investment companyamount that reflects the consideration to measure noncontrolling ownership interests in other investment companies at fair value. The ASU also requires additional disclosures of (a) the fact thatwhich the entity is an investment company and is applying the guidance in ASC 946, “Financial Services—Investment Companies” (“ASC 946”), (b) information about changes, if any, in an entity’s status as an investment company, and (c) information about financial support provided or contractually requiredexpects to be provided by an investment company to any of its investees.entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The ASU is effective for an entity’sannual periods and interim and annual reporting periods in fiscal years that beginwithin those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2013.2017 under a modified retrospective approach or retrospectively to all periods presented. The MHFG Group adopted ASUNo.2014-09 using the modified retrospective approach on April 1, 2018. At adoption, the Group’s presentation of certain costs related to securities underwriting changed from a net basis to a gross basis. However, the adoption of ASU No.2013-08No.2014-09 and subsequent amendments did not have a material impact on the MHFG Group’s consolidated results of operations or financial condition.

In June 2014, the FASB issued ASUNo.2014-11, “Transfers and Servicing (Topic860)—Repurchase-to-Maturity Transactions, Repurchase Financings, and Disclosures” (“ASUNo.2014-11”). The ASU changes the accounting See Note 26 “Noninterest income” forrepurchase-to-maturity transactions to secured borrowing accounting. For repurchase financing arrangements, the ASU requires separate accounting for a transfer of a financial asset executed contemporaneously with a repurchase agreement with the same counterparty, which will result in secured borrowing accounting for the repurchase agreement. The ASU requires disclosures for certain transactions comprising (1) a transfer of a financial asset accounted for as a sale and (2) an agreement with the same transferee entered into in contemplation of the initial transfer that results in the transferor retaining substantially all of the exposure to the economic return on the transferred financial asset throughout the term of the transaction. The ASU also requires an entity to disclose certain information, including risks related to collateral pledged, for repurchase agreements, securities lending transactions, andrepurchase-to-maturity transactions that are accounted for as secured borrowings. The ASU is effective for the first interim or annual period beginning after December 15, 2014, except for interim disclosure requirements related

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

to secured borrowings, which are effective for interim periods beginning after March 15, 2015. The adoption of ASU No.2014-11 did not have a material impact on the MHFG Group’s consolidated results of operations or financial condition. further information.

In November 2014, the FASB issued ASUNo.2014-16, “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815)—Determining Whether the Host Contract in a Hybrid Financial Instrument Issued in the Form of a Share Is More Akin to Debt or to Equity” (“ASUNo.2014-16”). The ASU clarifies that an entity that issues or invests in a hybrid financial instrument should determine the nature of the host contract by considering the economic characteristics and risks of the entire hybrid financial instrument, including the embedded derivative feature that is being evaluated for bifurcation. The ASU also clarifies that an entity should assess the substance of the relevant terms and features in evaluating the nature of a host contract when considering how to weight those terms and features. Specifically, the assessment of the substance of the relevant terms and features should incorporate a consideration of (1) the characteristics of the terms and features themselves, (2) the circumstances under which the hybrid financial instrument was issued or acquired, and (3) the potential outcomes of the hybrid financial instrument, as well as the likelihood of those potential outcomes. The ASU is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. The MHFG Group adopted ASUNo.2014-16 on April 1, 2016. The adoption of ASUNo.2014-16 did not have a material impact on the MHFG Group’s consolidated results of operations or financial condition.

In February 2015, the FASB issued ASUNo.2015-02, “Consolidation (Topic 810)—Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis” (“ASUNo.2015-02”). The ASU amends the current accounting for consolidation of certain legal entities. Specifically the amendments: (1) modify the evaluation of whether limited partnerships and similar legal entities are VIEs or voting interest entities, (2) eliminate the presumption that a general partner

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

should consolidate a limited partnership, (3) affect the consolidation analysis of reporting entities that are involved with VIEs, particularly those that have fee arrangements and related party relationships, and (4) provide a scope exception from consolidation guidance for reporting entities with interests in legal entities that are required to comply with or operate in accordance with requirements that are similar to those in Rule2a-7 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 for registered money market funds. On April 1, 2016,The ASU is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015, and may be applied retrospectively or applied using a modified retrospective approach by recording a cumulative-effect adjustment to equity as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. The MHFG Group adopted ASUNo.2015-02 using a modified retrospective approach.approach on April 1, 2016. The adoption of the ASU resulted in a decrease to the beginning balance of Retained earnings of ¥329 million and an increase to the beginning balance of Accumulated other comprehensive incomeAOCI of ¥330 million, respectively. See Note 25 “Variable interest entities and securitizations” for further information.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASUNo.2015-03, “Interest—Imputation of Interest (Subtopic835-30)—Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs” (“ASUNo.2015-03”). The ASU requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The ASU is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015 and interim periods within those fiscal years, and should be applied retrospectively. The MHFG Group adopted ASUNo.2015-03 on April 1, 2016. The adoption of ASU No.2015-03 did not have a material impact on the MHFG Group’s consolidated results of operations or financial condition. The retrospective adoption ofASU No.2015-03 resulted in the reduction of Other assets andLong-term debt in the comparative consolidated balance sheet.

In May 2015, the FASB issued ASUNo.2015-07, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820)—Disclosures for Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent)” (“ASU(“ASU No.2015-07”). The ASU removes the requirement to categorize within the fair value hierarchy all investments for which fair value is measured using the net asset value per share practical expedient. The ASU also removes the requirement to make certain disclosures for all investments that are eligible to be measured at fair value using the net asset value per share practical expedient. Rather, those disclosures are limited to investments for which the entity has elected to

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

measure the fair value using that practical expedient. The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years, and should be applied retrospectively to all periods presented. The MHFG Group adopted ASUNo.2015-07 on April 1, 2016. The adoption of ASUNo.2015-07 did not have a material impact on the MHFG Group’s consolidated results of operations or financial condition.

Accounting pronouncements issued but not yet effective

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASUNo.2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)”(“ASU No.2014-09”). The ASU provides comprehensive guidance in respect of revenue recognition, in convergence with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”), to improve financial reporting in U.S. GAAP by replacing the current complex guidance for recognizing revenue. The core principle of this ASU is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The ASU was effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2016. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASUNo.2015-14, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)—Deferral of the Effective Date” (“ASUNo.2015-14”) to defer the effective date ofASU No.2014-09 by one year. Therefore, ASUNo.2014-09 is effective for annual periods and interim reporting periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017 under a modified retrospective approach or retrospectively to all periods presented. Early application is permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. The MHFG Group expects to adopt ASUNo.2014-09 on April 1, 2018 and is currently evaluating the potential impact that the adoption of ASUNo.2014-09 and any subsequent amendments will have on its consolidated results of operations and financial condition, as well as on its disclosures. The Group is also currently evaluating the method of adoption. While the guidance is not applicable to revenue associated with financial instruments such as loans, investment securities and derivatives, the Group currently expects that the new guidance may primarily affect Fee and commission income, including brokerage fees, underwriting fees and asset management fees, and Other noninterest income. In preparation for the adoption of the new guidance, the Group has been working to perform an initial scoping analysis of the Group’s revenue contracts and is in the process of identifying revenue contracts to be reviewed in further detail.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASUNo.2016-01, “Financial Instruments—Overall (Subtopic825-10)—Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“ASUNo.2016-01”). The ASU requires equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income. The ASU also requires an entity to present separately in other comprehensive income the portion of the total change in the fair value of a liability resulting from a change in the instrument-specific credit risk when the entity has elected to measure the liability at fair value in accordance with the fair value option for financial instruments. Before the adoption of ASUNo.2016-01, marketable equity securities were reported as Trading account assets andAvailable-for-sale securities whereas other equity interests, which primarily consisted ofnon-marketable equity securities, were reported as Other investments. After the adoption of ASUNo.2016-01, all of these securities are reported as Equity securities. In connection with the adoption of ASUNo.2016-01, Investments gains (losses)—net of Equity securities and Debt securities are presented separately in the Group’s consolidated results of operations. The amounts for the prior periods have been reclassified in order to conform to the current year’s presentation. The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years, and should be applied using a cumulative-effect adjustment to the

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

balance sheet as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. Early application by public business entities is permitted for financial statements of fiscal years or interim periods that have not yet been issued. The MHFG Group adopted the ASU on April 1, 2018 and increased Retained earnings by ¥1,545 billion, net of tax, including any stranded tax amounts from prior periods, on the date of adoption. The majority of this amount related to marketable equity securities which increased Retained earnings of ¥1,530 billion, net of tax, including any stranded tax amounts from prior periods, as cumulative-effect adjustment out of AOCI into Retained earnings. For additional information, see Note 4 “Investments”, Note 17 “Accumulated other comprehensive income”, Note 23 “Derivative financial instruments” and Note 28 “Fair value”. The impact of the adoption resulted in a cumulative-effect adjustment out of Retained earnings to AOCI related to the instrument-specific credit risk for liabilities for which the fair value option was elected, which increased Retained earnings of ¥10 billion, net of tax, on April 1, 2018. For additional information, see Note 17 “Accumulated other comprehensive income”, Note 20 “Income taxes” and Note 28 “Fair value”. The remaining ¥5 billion, net of tax, on April 1, 2018, related to equity securities that qualify for the practical expedient to estimate fair value using the net asset value per share (or its equivalent), which were previously measured at cost.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASUNo.2016-16, “Income Taxes (Topic 740)—Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory” (“ASUNo.2016-16”). The ASU requires recognition of current and deferred income taxes in an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs although current U.S. GAAP has prohibited the recognition of income tax consequences of the transfer until the asset has been sold to an outside party. The ASU does not include new disclosure requirements; however, existing disclosure requirements might be applicable when accounting for the current and deferred income taxes for an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory. The ASU is currently evaluatingeffective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years, and should be applied using a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the potential impact thatbeginning of the fiscal year of adoption. The MHFG Group adopted ASUNo.2016-16 on April 1, 2018. The adoption of ASUNo.2016-01No. 2016-16 willdid not have a material impact on itsthe Group’s consolidated results of operations andor financial condition.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASUNo.2017-09, “Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718)—Scope of Modification Accounting” (“ASUNo.2017-09”). The ASU provides clarity and reduces both (1) diversity in practice and (2) cost and complexity when applying the guidance in Topic 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation, to a change to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award. The ASU provides guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting in Topic 718. An entity should account for the effects of a modification unless all the following factors of the award are the same before and after the modification: (1) the fair value, (2) the vesting conditions and (3) the classification as an equity or a liability instrument. The current disclosure requirements in Topic 718 apply regardless of whether an entity is required to apply modification accounting under the ASU. The ASU is effective for all entities for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017, and should be applied prospectively to an award modified on or after the adoption date. The MHFG Group adopted ASUNo.2017-09 on April 1, 2018. The adoption of ASUNo.2017-09 did not have a material impact on the Group’s consolidated results of operations or financial condition.

Accounting pronouncements issued but not yet effective as of March 31, 2019

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASUNo.2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)” (“ASUNo.2016-02”). The ASU requires lessees to recognize the assets and liabilities arising from leases on the balance sheet. Lessees should recognize liabilities to make lease payments andright-of-use assets representing its right to use the underlying assets for the lease term. This recognition applies to leases classified as operating leases and finance leases, and

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

the update retains a distinction between finance leases and operating leases. However, the ASU has not changed

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee significantly. The ASU also requires qualitative disclosures along with specific quantitative disclosures including the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. In transition, an entity is required to recognize and measure leases at the beginning of the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach. The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application is permitted. TheOn April 1, 2019, the MHFG Group is currently evaluatingadopted ASU2016-02 prospectively without adjustments to the potential impact thatcomparative periods presented. The Group elected the practical expedients to not reassess whether existing contracts contain leases, lease classification for any existing leases, or initial direct costs for existing leases. At adoption, the Group recognizedright-of-use assets and lease liabilities of approximately ¥0.6 trillion. The adoption of the ASUNo.2016-02 will did not have on itsmaterial impact to the Group’s consolidated results of operations and financial condition.shareholders’ equity.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASUNo.2016-13, “Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326)—Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments” (“ASUNo.2016-13”). The ASU replaces the incurred loss impairment methodology in current U.S. GAAP with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses and requires consideration of a broader range of information such as relevant information about past events including historical experience, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the reported amount, for the purpose of informing credit loss estimates. The ASU requires a financial asset (or a group of financial assets) measured at amortized cost basis to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected. The income statement reflects the measurement of credit losses for newly recognized financial assets, as well as the expected increases or decreases of expected credit losses that have taken place during the period. The ASU also requires that credit losses onavailable-for-sale debt securities be presented as an allowance for credit losses rather than as a write-down, and limits the amount of the allowance for credit losses to the amount by which fair value is below amortized cost. In April 2019, the FASB issued ASUNo.2019-04, “Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses “(“ASU No.2019-04”). The ASU isclarify the scope of the credit losses standard and address issues related to accrued interest receivable balances, recoveries, variable interest rates and prepayments, among other things. In May 2019, the FASB issued ASUNo.2019-05, “Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326)—Targeted Transition Relief” (“ASU No.2019-05”). The ASU provides an option to irrevocably elect the fair value option for certain financial assets previously measured at amortized cost basis. The ASUs are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years, and will be applied using a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective. Early application is permitted as of the fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The MHFG Group is currently evaluating the potential impact that the adoption ofexpects to adopt ASUNo.2016-13No.2016-13,2019-04, will haveand2019-05 on its consolidated results of operations and financial condition.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASUNo.2016-16, “Income Taxes (Topic 740)—Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory” (“ASUNo.2016-16”).April 1, 2020. The ASU requires recognition of current and deferred income taxes in an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs although current U.S. GAAP has prohibited the recognition of income tax consequences of the transfer until the asset has been sold to an outside party. The ASU does not include new disclosure requirements; however, existing disclosure requirements might be applicable when accounting for the current and deferred income taxes for an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory. The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years, and should be applied using a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. Early application is permitted for all entities as of the beginning of a fiscal year for which financial statements (interim or annual) have not been issued or made available for issuance. The MHFG Group is currently evaluating the potential impact that the adoption of ASUNo.2016-16No.2016-13,2019-04, and2019-05 will have on its consolidated results of operations and financial condition.condition, as well as on its disclosures. The Group’s implementation efforts include identifying key interpretative issues and assessing existing credit forecasting models and processes against the ASU. The Group expects that the allowance related to the Group’s loans could increase especially in the retail portfolio segment. The extent of the potential change in the allowance is under evaluation, but will depend upon the nature and characteristics of the Group’s portfolio at the adoption date, and the macroeconomic conditions and forecasts at that date.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASUNo.2017-04, “Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350)—Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment” (“ASUNo.2017-04”). The ASU eliminates Step 2, under which an entity had to perform procedures to determine the fair value at the impairment testing date of its assets and liabilities, from the goodwill impairment test. Instead, under the ASU, an entity should perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount.amount and should recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value. The ASU is effective for annual or interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early application is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

testing dates after January 1, 2017. The MHFG Group expects to adopt ASUNo.2017-04 on April 1, 2020. The Group is currently evaluating the potential impact that the adoption of ASUASU No. 2017-04No.2017-04 will have on its consolidated results of operations and financial condition.

In MayAugust 2017, the FASB issued ASUNo.2017-09,No.2017-12, “Compensation—Stock Compensation“Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 718)815)Scope of Modification Accounting”Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities” (“ASUNo.2017-09” No.2017-12”). The ASU provides clarityamends the current accounting for derivatives and reduces bothhedging to enable entities to better portray the economic results of risk management activities in the financial statements. Specifically, the amendments: (1) diversityeliminate the separate measurement and reporting of hedge ineffectiveness, (2) expand the ability to hedge nonfinancial and financial risk components, and (3) provide an alternative method for measuring the hedged item in practice and (2) cost and complexity when applying the guidance in Topic 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation, to a change to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award. The ASU provides guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting in Topic 718. An entity should account for the effects of a modification unless all the following factors of the award are the same before and after the modification: (1) the fair value (2) the vesting conditions and (3) the classification as an equity or a liability instrument. The current disclosure requirements in Topic 718 apply regardlesshedges of whether an entity is required to apply modification accounting under the ASU.interest rate risk. The ASU is effective for all entities for annual periods,fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017,fiscal years, and should be applied prospectivelyusing a cumulative-effect adjustment to an award modified on or after the adoption date.balance sheet as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. Early application is permitted, including adoption in any interim period. The MHFG Group adopted ASUNo.2017-12 on April 1, 2019. The Group does not expect that the adoption of ASUNo.2017-12 will have a material impact on its consolidated results of operations or financial condition.

In February 2018, the FASB issued ASUNo.2018-02, “Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220)—Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income” (“ASUNo.2018-02”). The ASU allows a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years, and should be applied either in the period for public business entitiesof adoption or retrospectively to each period (or periods) in which the effect of the change in the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act is recognized. Early application is permitted, including adoption in any interim period, for reporting periods for which financial statements have not yet been issued. The MHFG Group adopted ASUNo.2018-02 on April 1, 2019. The Group does not expect that the adoption of ASUNo. 2017-09No.2018-02 will have a material impact on its consolidated results of operations or financial condition.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASUNo.2018-13, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820)—Disclosure Framework—Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement” (“ASUNo.2018-13”). The ASU modifies the disclosure requirements for fair value measurements in order to improve the effectiveness of the notes to financial statements: some disclosure requirements are removed or modified, and some requirements are added. The ASU mainly adds the disclosure requirements to report the changes in unrealized gains and losses for the period included in other comprehensive income for recurring Level 3 fair value measurements held at the end of the reporting period and the range and weighted average or other quantitative information of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 fair value measurements. The ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. The amendments on changes in unrealized gains and losses, the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 fair value measurements, and the narrative description of measurement uncertainty should be applied prospectively for only the most recent interim or annual period presented in the initial fiscal year of adoption, and other amendments should be applied retrospectively. Early application is permitted. The MHFG Group expects to adopt ASUNo.2018-13 on April 1, 2020. The Group is currently evaluating the potential impact that the adoption of ASUNo.2018-13 will have on the disclosures in its consolidated financial statements.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASUNo.2018-14, “Compensation—Retirement Benefits—Defined Benefit Plans—General (Subtopic715-20)—Disclosure Framework—Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans” (“ASUNo.2018-14”). The amendments in this update remove disclosures that no longer

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

are considered cost beneficial, clarify the specific requirements of disclosures, and add disclosure requirements identified as relevant. Mainly, the ASU removes the disclosure requirement of the amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income expected to be recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost over the next fiscal year, and adds the disclosure requirement of the weighted-average interest crediting rates for cash balance plans and other plans with promised interest crediting rates. The ASU is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2020, and should be applied on a retrospective basis to all periods presented. Early application is permitted for all entities. The MHFG Group expects to adopt ASUNo.2018-14 on April 1, 2020. The Group is currently evaluating the potential impact that the adoption of ASUNo.2018-14 will have on its consolidated results of operations and financial condition.

In October 2018, the FASB issued ASUNo.2018-16, “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815)—Inclusion of the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) Overnight Index Swap (“OIS”) Rate as a Benchmark Interest Rate for Hedge Accounting Purposes” (“ASU No.2018-16”). The ASU permits use of the OIS rate based on SOFR as a U.S. benchmark interest rate for hedge accounting purposes under Topic 815 in addition to the interest rates on direct Treasury obligations of the U.S. government (“UST”), the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) swap rate, the OIS rate based on the Federal Funds Effective Rate, and the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (“SIFMA”) Municipal Swap Rate. The amendments in ASUNo.2018-16 are required to be adopted concurrently with the amendments in ASUNo.2017-12, and should be applied on a prospective basis for qualifying new or redesignated hedging relationships entered into on or after the date of adoption. Early application is permitted, including adoption in any interim period. The MHFG Group adopted ASUNo.2018-16 on April 1, 2019. The Group does not expect that the adoption of ASUNo.2018-16 will have a material impact on its consolidated results of operations or financial condition.

In October 2018, the FASB issued ASUNo.2018-17, “Consolidation (Topic 810)—Targeted Improvements to Related Party Guidance for Variable Interest Entities” (“ASUNo.2018-17”). The ASU requires indirect interests held through related parties in common control arrangements to be considered on a proportional basis for determining whether fees paid to decision makers and service providers are variable interests. The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years, and should be applied retrospectively with a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings at the beginning of the earliest period presented. Early application is permitted. The MHFG Group expects to adopt ASUNo.2018-17 on April 1, 2020. The Group does not expect that the adoption of ASUNo.2018-17 will have a material impact on its consolidated results of operations or financial condition.

3. Business combination

Integration among asset management companies

On October 1, 2016, DIAM Co., Ltd. (“DIAM”), MHTB, Mizuho Asset Management Co., Ltd. (“MHAM”) and Shinko Asset Management Co., Ltd. (“Shinko Asset Management”) (collectively, the “Integrating Companies”) integrated their asset management functions pursuant to an integration agreement signed on July 13, 2016. The integration was implemented through the following steps: (i) a merger between MHAM as surviving company and Shinko Asset Management as absorbed company; (ii) a company split between MHTB and MHAM (after the merger in (i) above) as successor company whereby rights and obligations attributed to Asset Management Division of MHTB were transferred to MHAM; and (iii) a merger between DIAM as surviving company and MHAM as absorbed company. After the integration, DIAM was renamed Asset Management One.

As of September 30, 2016, MHAM was a wholly-owned subsidiary of MHFG and DIAM was an equity method affiliate of the MHFG Group which owned 50.0% of the voting equity interests. DIAM was a joint venture of MHFG andDai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc.(“Dai-ichi Life”, formerly TheDai-ichi Life Insurance Company,

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Limited), and the rest of the interests of DIAM was owned byDai-ichi Life. On October 1, 2016, MHFG exchanged 30.0% of the voting equity interests in MHAM (after the split in (ii) above) for voting equity interests andnon-voting equity interests in DIAM. As a result of the exchange, MHFG acquired 51.0% of the voting rights and 70.0% of the economic interests in Asset Management One, which became a consolidated subsidiary of the Group.

Based on the strong commitment of MHFG andDai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc.(“Dai-ichi Life”) to strengthen and develop their respective asset management businesses, Asset Management One aims to achieve significant development as a global asset management company, providing its customers with high-quality solutions by combining the asset management-related knowledge and experience accumulated and developed by each of the Integrating Companies over many years, and by taking full advantage of collaboration with both the MHFG Group and theDai-ichi Life group. The MHFG Group recognized goodwill at the acquisition date. The goodwill was not allocated to the reportable segments in Note 32 “Business segment information”. The MHFG Group allocated the entire amount of the goodwill to the Asset Management One reporting unit for the purpose of assessing impairment. None of the goodwill recognized is deductible for tax purposes.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

The following table summarizes the consideration paid for DIAM and the amounts of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities recognized at the acquisition date, as well as the fair value at the acquisition date of the noncontrolling interest in DIAM. There were no material acquisition-related costs that were recognized separately from the acquisition of the assets and the assumption of the liabilities.

 

   At October 1,
2016
 
   

(in millions of yen)

 

Consideration:

  

Equity instruments (1,038,408 common shares of MHAM)

   28,842 
  

 

 

 

Fair value of total consideration transferred

   28,842 

Fair value of equity interests in DIAM held by MHFG before the business combination

   72,106 
  

 

 

 
   100,948 
  

 

 

 

Recognized amounts of identifiable assets acquired:

  

Cash and due from banks

   831 

Interest-bearing deposits in other banks

   12,873 

Trading account assets

   266 

Investments

   12,234 

Premises and equipment-net

   3,546 

Accrued income

   7,882 

Intangible assets(Note)

   53,037 

Deferred tax assets

   1,003 

Other assets

   2,208 

Recognized amounts of identifiable liabilities assumed:

  

Trading account liabilities

   304 

Income taxes payable

   918 

Deferred taxes liabilities

   16,238 

Accrued expenses

   5,392 

Other liabilities

   3,041 
  

 

 

 

Total identifiable net assets

   67,987 

Goodwill

   76,225 
  

 

 

 

Noncontrolling interest in DIAM

   43,264 
  

 

 

 
   100,948 
  

 

 

 

 

Note:

Amount represents customer relationships subject to amortization, of which the weighted-average amortization period is 16.9 years.

The fair value of the equity interests in DIAM held by MHFG before the business combination (¥72,106 million), the fair value of the 1,038,408 common shares of MHAM as the consideration paid for DIAM (¥28,842 million) and the fair value of the noncontrolling interest in DIAM (¥43,264 million) were determined with reference to an independent third-party appraisal by applying the income approach and the market approach. The income approach was based on the discounted future cash flows of DIAM and MHAM and the market approach was based on market values, earnings and revenues of public companies comparable to DIAM and MHAM. A discount for lack of control was not considered in determining the fair value of the noncontrolling interest, which

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

is entirely held byDai-Ichi Life, as the economic benefits of DIAM are expected to be divided proportionately between MHFG andDai-Ichi Life based on their respective economic interests.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

On October 1, 2016, the MHFG Group recognized a gain of ¥56,226 million as a result of remeasuring to fair value its 50.0% of the voting equity interests in DIAM held before the business combination. The gain is included in Other noninterest income in the Group’s consolidated statement of income for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017. In addition, the MHFG Group recognized an increase in Common stock of ¥23,829 million as a result of remeasuring to fair value its 30.0% of the voting equity interests in MHAM held before the business combination due to the change in the voting equity interests in MHAM.MHAM on October 1, 2016.

The revenue and earnings of Asset Management One since the acquisition date included in the Group’s consolidated statement of income for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 are not material. Other than the gain of ¥56,226 million described above, the revenue and earnings of the MHFG Group would not have differed significantly from those reported in the consolidated statements of income for the fiscal yearsyear ended March 31, 2016 and 2017 if the business combination had occurred as of the beginning of the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016.year.

4. Investments

Available-for-sale andheld-to-maturity securities

The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, and fair value ofavailable-for-sale andheld-to-maturity securities at March 31, 20162018 and 20172019 are as follows:

 

  Amortized cost   Gross unrealized
gains
   Gross unrealized
losses
   Fair value   Amortized cost

 

   Gross unrealized
gains

 

   Gross unrealized
losses

 

   Fair value

 

 
  (in millions of yen)   (in millions of yen) 

2016

        

2018

        

Available-for-sale securities:

                

Debt securities:

                

Japanese government bonds

   15,672,171    91,420    1,015    15,762,576    13,334,619    7,332    9,656    13,332,295 

Japanese local government bonds

   234,587    6,097    3    240,681    236,711    2,903    280    239,334 

U.S. Treasury bonds and federal agency securities

   436,792    1,720    32    438,480    689,297    109    3,557    685,849 

Other foreign government bonds

   939,808    2,740    153    942,395    1,057,852    1,043    1,102    1,057,793 

Agency mortgage-backed securities (1)

   920,375    29,804    1,293    948,886    882,686    13,356    7,628    888,414 

Residential mortgage-backed securities

   206,882    4,254    878    210,258    117,870    1,264    281    118,853 

Commercial mortgage-backed securities

   186,525    788    523    186,790    437,115    4,132    323    440,924 

Japanese corporate bonds and other debt securities (2)

   2,079,599    15,688    420    2,094,867    1,950,947    40,290    1,410    1,989,827 

Foreign corporate bonds and other debt securities (3)

   839,981    8,744    1,421    847,304    879,506    1,927    2,082    879,351 

Equity securities (marketable)(4)

   1,663,486    2,121,379    4,577    3,780,288    1,595,106    2,449,173    11,291    4,032,988 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   23,180,206    2,282,634    10,315    25,452,525    21,181,709    2,521,529    37,610    23,665,628 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Held-to-maturity securities:

                

Debt securities:

                

Japanese government bonds

   3,760,032    56,620    —      3,816,652    1,959,910    24,472    —      1,984,382 

Agency mortgage-backed securities(4)(5)

   1,058,929    3,894    6,266    1,056,557    557,641    —      20,177    537,464 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   4,818,961    60,514    6,266    4,873,209    2,517,551    24,472    20,177    2,521,846 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

  Amortized cost   Gross unrealized
gains
   Gross unrealized
losses
   Fair value   Amortized cost   Gross unrealized
gains
   Gross unrealized
losses
   Fair value 
  (in millions of yen)   

 

(in millions of yen)

 

2017

        

2019

        

Available-for-sale securities:

                

Debt securities:

                

Japanese government bonds

   10,256,512    22,782    16,408    10,262,886    11,888,510    11,259    2,998    11,896,771 

Japanese local government bonds

   279,864    4,841    233    284,472    208,308    1,671    87    209,892 

U.S. Treasury bonds and federal agency securities

   1,148,389    10    4,578    1,143,821    1,008,903    644    231    1,009,316 

Other foreign government bonds

   933,942    1,246    236    934,952    1,341,564    758    455    1,341,867 

Agency mortgage-backed securities (1)

   832,738    15,500    5,441    842,797    530,540    14,524    593    544,471 

Residential mortgage-backed securities

   142,879    1,838    558    144,159    99,904    1,420    191    101,133 

Commercial mortgage-backed securities

   223,105    1,092    282    223,915    495,313    4,914    104    500,123 

Japanese corporate bonds and other debt securities (2)

   1,958,472    52,046    2,286    2,008,232    1,743,309    7,686    1,561    1,749,434 

Foreign corporate bonds and other debt securities (3)

   909,052    3,377    1,643    910,786    778,088    3,047    226    780,909 

Equity securities (marketable)(4)

   1,528,808    2,273,883    1,593    3,801,098    —      —      —      —   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   18,213,761    2,376,615    33,258    20,557,118    18,094,439       45,923       6,446    18,133,916 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Held-to-maturity securities:

                

Debt securities:

                

Japanese government bonds

   3,059,976    37,168    —      3,097,144    1,119,899    19,907    —      1,139,806 

Agency mortgage-backed securities(4)(5)

   757,384    121    7,931    749,574    484,205    —      14,423    469,782 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   3,817,360    37,289    7,931    3,846,718    1,604,104    19,907    14,423    1,609,588 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

Notes :Notes:

(1)

Agency mortgage-backed securities presented in the above tablethis line consist of U.S.Japanese and Foreign agency securities and Japanese agencymortgage-backed securities, of which the fair values were ¥168,604¥742,565 million and ¥780,282¥145,849 million, respectively, at March 31, 2016,2018, and ¥134,240¥517,330 million and ¥708,557¥27,141 million, respectively, at March 31, 2017. U.S.2019. All Japanese agency mortgage-backed securities are issued by Japan Housing Finance Agency, a Japanese government-sponsored enterprise. Foreign agency mortgage-backed securities primarily consist of Government National Mortgage Association (“Ginnie Mae”) securities, which are guaranteed by the United States government. All Japanese agency securities are mortgage-backed securities issued by Japan Housing Finance Agency, a Japanese government-sponsored enterprise.

(2)

Other debt securities presented in the above tablethis line primarily consist of Japanese negotiable certificates of deposit (“CDs”NCDs”), of which the total fair values were ¥106,101 million at March 31, 2018, and ¥6,725 million at March 31, 2019.

(3)

Other debt securities presented in this line primarily consist of Foreign NCDs and asset-backed securities (“ABS”), of which the total fair values were ¥158,446¥313,164 million at March 31, 2016,2018, and ¥155,138¥246,503 million at March 31, 2017.

(3)Other debt securities presented in the above table primarily consist of CDs, ABS, and collateralized loan obligations (“CLO”), of which the total fair values were ¥201,952 million at March 31, 2016, and ¥258,059 million at March 31, 2017.2019.

(4)

The MHFG Group adopted ASUNo.2016-01 on April 1, 2018, resulting in a cumulative-effect adjustment from AOCI to Retained earnings for net unrealized gains on equity securities (marketable). Theavailable-for-sale category was eliminated for equity securities effective April 1, 2018. See Note 2 “Recently issued accounting pronouncements” for further details.

(5)

All Agency mortgage-backed securities presented in the above tablethis line are Ginnie Mae securities.

Contractual maturities

The amortized cost and fair value ofavailable-for-sale andheld-to-maturity debt securities at March 31, 2017 by contractual maturity2019 are shown in the table below.below based on their contractual maturities. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without penalties. Securitiessome securities are not due at a single maturity date, and some securities, embedded with call or prepayment options, such as mortgage-backed securities, are included in the table below based on their contractual maturities.contain embedded call or prepayment options.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Amortized cost Due in one
year or less
 Due after one
year through
five years
 Due after five
years through
ten years
 Due after
ten years
 Total  Due in one
year or less
 Due after one
year through
five years
 Due after five
years through
ten years
 Due after
ten years
 Total 
 (in millions of yen)  

 

(in millions of yen)

 

Available-for-sale securities:

          

Debt securities:

          

Japanese government bonds

 3,147,992  5,538,724  1,569,796   —    10,256,512  7,839,925  2,326,357  1,461,333  260,895  11,888,510 

Japanese local government bonds

 41,307  101,307  136,701  549  279,864  7,229  118,677  77,336  5,066  208,308 

U.S. Treasury bonds and federal agency securities

 1,065,881   —    82,508   —    1,148,389  989,921  18,982   —     —    1,008,903 

Other foreign government bonds

 757,093  170,836  6,013   —    933,942  1,106,386  235,178   —     —    1,341,564 

Agency mortgage-backed securities

  —     —     —    832,738  832,738   —     —     —    530,540  530,540 

Residential mortgage-backed securities

  —     —     —    142,879  142,879   —     —    4,656  95,248  99,904 

Commercial mortgage-backed securities

 7,000  116,633  99,472   —    223,105  9,501  175,819  282,518  27,475  495,313 

Japanese corporate bonds and other debt securities

 471,592  866,455  431,097  189,328  1,958,472  137,824  876,876  521,851  206,758  1,743,309 

Foreign corporate bonds and other debt securities

 450,865  399,330  55,808  3,049  909,052  443,476  291,299  40,544  2,769  778,088 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 5,941,730  7,193,285  2,381,395  1,168,543  16,684,953  10,534,262  4,043,188  2,388,238  1,128,751  18,094,439 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Held-to-maturity securities:

          

Debt securities:

          

Japanese government bonds

 1,100,032  1,480,073  479,871   —    3,059,976  639,984  379,837  100,078   —    1,119,899 

Agency mortgage-backed securities

  —     —     —    757,384  757,384   —     —     —    484,205  484,205 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 1,100,032  1,480,073  479,871  757,384  3,817,360  639,984  379,837  100,078  484,205  1,604,104 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 
Fair value Due in one
year or less
 Due after one
year through
five years
 Due after five
years through
ten years
 Due after
ten years
 Total  Due in one
year or less
 Due after one
year through
five years
 Due after five
years through
ten years
 Due after
ten years
 Total 
 (in millions of yen)  (in millions of yen) 

Available-for-sale securities:

          

Debt securities:

          

Japanese government bonds

 3,151,367  5,549,293  1,562,226   —    10,262,886  7,840,638  2,329,473  1,465,030  261,630  11,896,771 

Japanese local government bonds

 41,366  102,326  140,138  642  284,472  7,263  119,115  78,275  5,239  209,892 

U.S. Treasury bonds and federal agency securities

 1,065,415   —    78,406   —    1,143,821  990,029  19,287   —     —    1,009,316 

Other foreign government bonds

 757,094  171,662  6,196   —    934,952  1,106,543  235,324   —     —    1,341,867 

Agency mortgage-backed securities

  —     —     —    842,797  842,797   —     —     —    544,471  544,471 

Residential mortgage-backed securities

  —     —     —    144,159  144,159   —     —    4,656  96,477  101,133 

Commercial mortgage-backed securities

 7,008  116,641  100,266   —    223,915  9,518  177,237  285,849  27,519  500,123 

Japanese corporate bonds and other debt securities

 472,047  869,226  433,132  233,827  2,008,232  138,670  878,396  524,003  208,365  1,749,434 

Foreign corporate bonds and other debt securities

 451,370  400,669  55,728  3,019  910,786  443,626  293,831  40,683  2,769  780,909 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 5,945,667  7,209,817  2,376,092  1,224,444  16,756,020  10,536,287  4,052,663  2,398,496  1,146,470  18,133,916 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Held-to-maturity securities:

          

Debt securities:

          

Japanese government bonds

 1,102,730  1,491,570  502,844   —    3,097,144  640,928  395,085  103,793   —    1,139,806 

Agency mortgage-backed securities

  —     —     —    749,574  749,574   —     —     —    469,782  469,782 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 1,102,730  1,491,570  502,844  749,574  3,846,718  640,928  395,085  103,793  469,782  1,609,588 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Other-than-temporary impairment

The MHFG Group performs periodic reviews to identify impaired securities in accordance with ASC 320, “Investments—Debt and Equity Securities” (“ASC 320”). For debt securities, in the cases where the MHFG Group has the intent to sell a debt security or more likely than not will be required to sell a debt security before the recovery of its amortized cost basis, the full amount of an other-than-temporary impairment loss is

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

recognized immediately through earnings. In other cases, the MHFG Group evaluates expected cash flows to be received and determines if a credit loss exists, and if so, the amount of an other-than-temporary impairment related to the credit loss is recognized in earnings, while the remaining decline in fair value is recognized in other comprehensive income, net of applicable taxes. ForEffective April 1, 2018, theavailable-for-sale category was eliminated for equity securities and, therefore, the other-than-temporary impairment review is not required for these securities. See Note 2 “Recently issued accounting pronouncements” for further details. Before the adoption of ASUNo.2016-01, for equity securities, impairment iswas evaluated considering the length of time and extent to which the fair value hashad been below cost, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuers, as well as the MHFG Group’s ability and intent to hold these investments for a reasonable period of time sufficient for a forecasted recovery of fair value. If an equity security iswas deemed other-than-temporarily impaired, it shall bewas written down to fair value, with the full decline recognized in earnings.

The following table shows the other-than-temporary impairment losses onavailable-for-sale securities for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2015, 20162017, 2018 and 2017.2019. No impairment losses were recognized onheld-to-maturity securities for the periods.

 

  2015   2016   2017   2017   2018   2019 
  (in millions of yen)   

 

(in millions of yen)

 

Available-for-sale securities:

            

Debt securities

   450    4,020    138    138    1,015    213 

Equity securities

   618    34,041    12,029 

Equity securities (Note)

   12,029    3,080    —   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   1,068    38,061    12,167    12,167    4,095    213 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Note:

Effective April 1, 2018, theavailable-for-sale category was eliminated for equity securities. See Note 2 “Recently issued accounting pronouncements” for further details.

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017,2019, the other-than-temporary impairment losses on debt securities were attributable to the decline in the fair value of certain Japanese corporate bonds in respect of which the MHFG Group determined credit losses existed. In accordance with ASC320-10-35-33A and ASC320-10-35-34B, 320, the other-than-temporary impairment on these securities was recognized in earnings. There has never been any instance relatedThe total other-than-temporary impairment met the criteria to credit losses on debt securities recognizedbe immediately recorded in earnings where aand no portion of an other-than-temporary impairment was recognized in other comprehensive income.

The other-than-temporary impairment losses on equity securities were mainly attributable to the decline in the fair value of certain Japanese equity securities.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Continuous unrealized loss position

The following table shows the gross unrealized losses and fair value ofavailable-for-sale andheld-to-maturity securities, aggregated by the length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at March 31, 20162018 and 2017:2019:

 

 Less than 12 months 12 months or more Total  Less than 12 months 12 months or more Total 
 Fair
value
 Gross
unrealized
losses
 Fair
value
 Gross
unrealized
losses
 Fair
value
 Gross
unrealized
losses
  Fair
value
 Gross
unrealized
losses
 Fair
value
 Gross
unrealized
losses
 Fair
value
 Gross
unrealized
losses
 
 (in millions of yen)  (in millions of yen) 

2016

 

2018

 

Available-for-sale securities:

            

Debt securities:

            

Japanese government bonds

 1,531,400  692  74,427  323  1,605,827  1,015  8,052,820  3,716  2,868,078  5,940  10,920,898  9,656 

Japanese local government bonds

 3,434  3   —     —    3,434  3  28,827  139  58,998  141  87,825  280 

U.S. Treasury bonds and federal agency securities

 315,425  32   —     —    315,425  32  515,005  3,557   —     —    515,005  3,557 

Other foreign government bonds

 225,493  139  225  14  225,718  153  419,648  1,030  68,359  72  488,007  1,102 

Agency mortgage-backed securities (1)

 15,965  86  58,147  1,207  74,112  1,293  45,434  1,116  188,326  6,512  233,760  7,628 

Residential mortgage-backed securities

 2,417  3  39,984  875  42,401  878  11,336  14  16,129  267  27,465  281 

Commercial mortgage-backed securities

 40,471  300  22,465  223  62,936  523  68,723  242  7,835  81  76,558  323 

Japanese corporate bonds and other debt securities

 360,782  348  20,109  72  380,891  420  563,831  933  403,069  477  966,900  1,410 

Foreign corporate bonds and other debt securities

 186,478  972  22,090  449  208,568  1,421  358,410  888  87,472  1,194  445,882  2,082 

Equity securities (marketable)

 71,262  4,515  180  62  71,442  4,577 

Equity securities (marketable)(2)

 338,243  11,249  366  42  338,609  11,291 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 2,753,127  7,090  237,627  3,225  2,990,754  10,315  10,402,277  22,884  3,698,632  14,726  14,100,909  37,610 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Held-to-maturity securities:

            

Debt securities:

            

Agency mortgage-backed securities (2)

 394,673  5,384  101,892  882  496,565  6,266 

Agency mortgage-backed securities (3)

 30,589  766  506,875  19,411  537,464  20,177 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 394,673  5,384  101,892  882  496,565  6,266  30,589  766  506,875  19,411  537,464  20,177 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

2017

 

2019

 

Available-for-sale securities:

            

Debt securities:

            

Japanese government bonds

 5,574,649  15,796  95,612  612  5,670,261  16,408  2,296,536  1,441  1,332,688  1,557  3,629,224  2,998 

Japanese local government bonds

 58,700  233   —     —    58,700  233  9,752  32  38,873  55  48,625  87 

U.S. Treasury bonds and federal agency securities

 1,013,962  4,578   —     —    1,013,962  4,578  506,176  231   —     —    506,176  231 

Other foreign government bonds

 334,300  230  8,327  6  342,627  236  438,771  321  26,782  134  465,553  455 

Agency mortgage-backed securities (1)

 195,887  3,705  42,501  1,736  238,388  5,441  466  2  37,706  591  38,172  593 

Residential mortgage-backed securities

 5,873  3  28,994  555  34,867  558   —     —    16,729  191  16,729  191 

Commercial mortgage-backed securities

 8,314  218  17,634  64  25,948  282  11,256  44  36,760  60  48,016  104 

Japanese corporate bonds and other debt securities

 470,602  2,062  158,713  224  629,315  2,286  417,825  924  440,937  637  858,762  1,561 

Foreign corporate bonds and other debt securities

 202,347  1,353  77,699  290  280,046  1,643  129,164  142  79,716  84  208,880  226 

Equity securities (marketable)

 30,688  383  4,117  1,210  34,805  1,593 

Equity securities (marketable) (2)

  —     —     —     —     —     —   
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 7,895,322  28,561  433,597  4,697  8,328,919  33,258  3,809,946  3,137  2,010,191  3,309  5,820,137  6,446 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Held-to-maturity securities:

            

Debt securities:

            

Agency mortgage-backed securities (2)

 460,882  3,518  259,466  4,413  720,348  7,931 

Agency mortgage-backed securities (3)

  —     —    469,782  14,423  469,782  14,423 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 460,882  3,518  259,466  4,413  720,348  7,931   —     —    469,782  14,423  469,782  14,423 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

Notes

:

(1)

Agency mortgage-backed securities presented in the above tablethis line consist of U.S.Japanese and Foreign agency securities and Japanese agencymortgage-backed securities, of which the fair values were ¥69,805¥88,017 million and ¥4,307¥145,743 million, respectively, at March 31, 2016,2018, and ¥134,118¥11,107 million and ¥104,270¥27,065 million, respectively, at March 31, 2017. U.S.2019. All Japanese agency mortgage-backed securities are issued by Japan Housing Finance Agency, a Japanese government-sponsored enterprise. Foreign agency mortgage-backed securities primarily consist of Ginnie Mae securities, which are guaranteed by the United States government. All Japanese agency securities are mortgage-backed securities issued by Japan Housing Finance Agency, a Japanese government-sponsored enterprise.

(2)All Agency mortgage-backed securities presented in the above table are Ginnie Mae securities.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

(2)

The MHFG Group adopted ASUNo.2016-01 on April 1, 2018, resulting in a cumulative-effect adjustment from AOCI to Retained earnings for net unrealized gains on equity securities (marketable). Theavailable-for-sale category was eliminated for equity securities effective April 1, 2018. See Note 2 “Recently issued accounting pronouncements” for further details.

(3)

All Agency mortgage-backed securities presented in this line are Ginnie Mae securities.

At March 31, 2017,2019, the MHFG Group did not intend to sell the debt securities in an unrealized loss position and it was not more likely than not that the MHFG Group would be required to sell them before the recovery of their amortized cost bases. For Japanese government bonds, U.S. Treasury bonds and federal agency securities and Agency mortgage-backed securities, their entire amortized cost bases were expected to be recovered since the unrealized losses had not resulted from credit deterioration, but primarily from changes in interest rates. For the debt securities other than those described above, including Japanese corporate bonds with similarexcept for the securities for which credit risks as the other-than-temporarily impaired securities,losses have been recognized in income, the MHFG Group determined that their entire amortized cost bases were expected to be recovered, after considering various factors such as the extent to which their fair values were below their amortized cost bases, the external and/or internal ratings and the present values of cash flows expected to be collected. Based on the aforementioned evaluation, the MHFG Group determined that the debt securities in an unrealized loss position were not considered other-than-temporarily impaired.

The equity securities in an unrealized loss position were determined not to be other-than-temporarily impaired based on the evaluation of the following factors: (1) the severity and duration of the impairments, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuers, and (3) the MHFG Group’s ability and intent to hold these investments for a reasonable period of time sufficient for a forecasted recovery of fair value.

Realized gains and losses

The following table shows the realized gains and losses on sales ofavailable-for-sale securities for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2015, 20162017, 2018 and 2017.2019. See “Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2015, 20162017, 2018 and 2017”2019” for the proceeds from sales of investments, the vast majority of which consists of the proceeds from sales ofavailable-for-sale securities.investments.

 

  2015 2016 2017   2017 2018 2019 (Note) 
  (in millions of yen)   

 

(in millions of yen)

 

Gross realized gains

   220,250  297,344  353,036    353,036  314,948  23,777 

Gross realized losses

   (14,670 (45,376 (21,163   (21,163 (41,044 (26,299
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net realized gains (losses) on sales ofavailable-for-sale securities

   205,580  251,968  331,873    331,873  273,904  (2,522
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Note:

Effective April 1, 2018, theavailable-for-sale category was eliminated for equity securities, and gains and losses on these securities are not included for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019 column in this table. See Note 2 “Recently issued accounting pronouncements” for further details.

Other investments

The following table summarizes the composition of Other investments at March 31, 20162018 and 2017:2019:

 

  2016   2017   2018   2019 
  (in millions of yen)   

 

(in millions of yen)

 

Equity method investments

   258,180    249,679    280,666    354,268 

Investments held by consolidated investment companies

   42,045    37,462    37,735    35,472 

Other equity interests

   313,221    307,928    267,495    —  (Note) 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   613,446    595,069    585,896    389,740 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Note:

In connection with the adoption of ASUNo.2016-01, other equity interests are disclosed as Equity securities. See Note 2 “Recently issued accounting pronouncements” for further details.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Equity method investments

Investments in investees over which the MHFG Group has the ability to exert significant influence are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Such investments included marketable equity securities with carrying values of ¥124,830¥152,445 million and ¥132,817¥201,034 million, at March 31, 20162018 and 2017,2019, respectively. The aggregate market values of these marketable equity securities were ¥277,508¥324,239 million and ¥273,249¥308,137 million, respectively.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The majority of the aggregate market values of these marketable equity securities are related toinclude Orient Corporation, of which the MHFG Group’s proportionate share of the total outstanding common stock was 49.0% as of March 31, 2017.2019.

Investments held by consolidated investment companies

The MHFG Group consolidates certain investment companies over which it has control through either ownership or other means. Investment companies are subject to specialized industry accounting which requires investments to be carried at fair value, with changes in fair value recorded in earnings. The MHFG Group maintains this specialized industry accounting for investments held by consolidated investment companies, which consist of marketable andnon-marketable investments.

Other equity interests

Other equity interests primarily consist ofnon-marketable equity securities, outside the scope of ASC 320, of which the fair values are not readily determinable, nor practicable to estimate. The MHFG Group has neither significant influence nor control over the investees. Each of these securities is stated at acquisition cost, with an other-than-temporary impairment, if any, included in earnings. The MHFG Group monitors the status of each investee, including its credit rating, to determine whether impairment losses should be recognized.

Equity securities

Equity securities include securities which have readily determinable fair values, securities which qualify for the practical expedient to estimate fair value using the net asset value per share (or its equivalent), and securities which are without readily determinable fair values. Equity securities which have readily determinable fair values mainly consist of common stock of Japanese listed companies. Equity securities without readily determinable fair values includenon-marketable stock including preferred stock issued by equity method investees.

Net gains and losses

The following table shows the details of the net gains and losses on Equity securities for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019:

2019
(in millions of yen)

Net gains and losses recognized during the period on equity securities

(155,947

Less: Net gains and losses recognized during the period on equity securities sold during the period

34,034

Unrealized gains and losses recognized during the reporting period on equity securities still held at the reporting period

(189,981

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Equity securities without readily determinable fair values

The following table shows the details of Equity securities without readily determinable fair values, for which the measurement alternative is used, for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019:

2019
(in millions of yen)

Carrying amounts at the end of the period

212,270

Downward adjustments and impairments:

During the period

1,413

Cumulative

1,413

Upward adjustments:

During the period

2,373

Cumulative

2,373

The MHFG Group elected to measure all equity securities without readily determinable fair values, which do not qualify for the practical expedient to estimate fair value, using the measurement alternative, which is made on aninstrument-by-instrument basis. Under the measurement alternative, equity securities are carried at cost plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or similar securities of the same issuer. In addition, the MHFG Group assesses whether these equity securities are impaired. Impairment is primarily based on a liquidation value technique that considers the financial condition, credit ratings, and near-term prospects of the issuers. When observable price changes or impairments exist, the securities are adjusted to fair value, with the full difference between the fair value of the security and its carrying amount recognized in earnings.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

5. Loans

The table below presents loans outstanding by domicile and industry of borrower at March 31, 20162018 and 2017:2019:

 

   2016   2017 
   (in millions of yen) 

Domestic:

    

Manufacturing

   8,344,808    8,740,281 

Construction and real estate

   7,733,513    7,654,016 

Services

   4,655,704    4,759,225 

Wholesale and retail

   5,408,850    5,142,003 

Transportation and communications

   3,267,902    3,490,415 

Banks and other financial institutions

   3,632,481    4,006,401 

Government and public institutions

   3,395,784    8,532,246 

Other industries(Note)

   4,619,336    4,427,349 

Individuals:

    

Mortgage loans

   10,589,646    9,964,633 

Other

   924,408    939,971 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total domestic

   52,572,432    57,656,540 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Foreign:

    

Commercial and industrial

   17,319,284    16,872,448 

Banks and other financial institutions

   6,382,449    6,759,921 

Government and public institutions

   1,174,665    959,948 

Other(Note)

   273,695    190,724 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total foreign

   25,150,093    24,783,041 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   77,722,525    82,439,581 

Less: Unearned income and deferred loan fees—net

   167,156    155,675 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total loans before allowance for loan losses

   77,555,369    82,283,906 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

   2018   2019 
   (in millions of yen) 

Domestic:

    

Manufacturing

   8,156,341    9,558,146 

Construction and real estate

   8,101,668    8,954,823 

Services

   5,024,018    5,113,386 

Wholesale and retail

   5,112,673    5,163,267 

Transportation and communications

   3,564,869    3,622,130 

Banks and other financial institutions

   4,471,423    4,303,231 

Government and public institutions

   8,882,125    2,358,904 

Other industries (Note)

   5,018,387    5,477,452 

Individuals:

    

Mortgage loans

   9,445,286    8,950,216 

Other

   883,724    907,589 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total domestic

   58,660,514    54,409,144 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Foreign:

    

Commercial and industrial

   17,195,159    19,086,511 

Banks and other financial institutions

   7,465,140    9,126,392 

Government and public institutions

   302,891    296,872 

Other

   37,636    33,171 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total foreign

   25,000,826    28,542,946 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   83,661,340    82,952,090 

Less: Unearned income and deferred loan fees—net

   146,696    152,147 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
Total loans before allowance for loan losses  83,514,644   82,799,943 
   

 

   

 

 

 

Note:

Other industries of Domestic and Other of Foreign includeincludes trade receivables and lease receivables of consolidated VIEs.

Net losses on sales of loans were ¥33,291¥919 million, ¥1,752¥87 million and ¥919¥2,018 million, including unrealized losses related to recording loans held for sale at the lower of cost or fair value of ¥34,262 million, ¥810 million, and ¥310 million for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2015, 20162017, 2018 and 2017,2019, respectively. The gains and losses on sales of loans are recorded in Other noninterest income and expenses, respectively.

Credit quality information

In accordance with the MHFG Group’s credit risk management policies, the Group uses an internal rating system that consists of credit ratings for the corporate portfolio segment and pool allocations for the retail portfolio segment as the basis of its risk management infrastructure. Credit ratings consist of obligor ratings which represent the level of credit risk of the obligor, and transaction ratings which represent the ultimate possibility of incurring losses on individual loans by taking into consideration various factors such as collateral or guarantees involved. In principle, obligor ratings are applied to all obligors except those to which pool allocations are applied, and are subject to regular review at least once a year as well as special review which is required whenever the obligor’s credit standing changes. Pool allocations are applied to groups of small balance, homogeneous loans. The Group poolsloans that are less than a specified amount by pooling customers and loans with similar risk characteristics, and the risk is assessed mainly based on past due status and managed according to such pools. The Group generally reviews the appropriateness

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

and effectiveness of the approach to obligor ratings and pool allocations once a year in accordance with predetermined policies and procedures.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The table below presents the MHFG Group’s definition of obligor ratings used by MHBK and MHTB:

 

Obligor category(1)(2)

  Obligor rating(3)  

Definition

Normal

  A  Obligors whose certainty of debt fulfillment is very high, hence their level of credit risk is very low.
  B  Obligors whose certainty of debt fulfillment poses no problems for the foreseeable future, and their level of credit risk is low.
  C  Obligors whose certainty of debt fulfillment and their level of credit risk pose no problems for the foreseeable future.
  D  Obligors whose current certainty of debt fulfillment poses no problems, however, their resistance to future economic environmental changes is low.

Watch (Note)

  E1  Obligors that require observation going forward because of either minor concerns regarding their financial position, or their somewhat weak or unstable business conditions.
  E2  Obligors that require special observation going forward because of problems with their borrowings such as reduced or suspended interest payments, problems with debt fulfillment such as failure to make principal or interest payments, or problems with their financial position as a result of their weak or unstable business conditions.

Intensive control

  F  Obligors that are not yet bankrupt but are in financial difficulties and are deemed likely to become bankrupt in the future because of insufficient progress in implementing their management improvement plans or other measures (including obligors that are receiving ongoing support from financial institutions).

Substantially bankrupt

  G  Obligors that have not yet become legally or formally bankrupt but are substantially insolvent because they are in serious financial difficulties and are deemed to be incapable of being restructured.

Bankrupt

  H  Obligors that have become legally or formally bankrupt.

 

Notes:

Note:(1)

Special attention obligors are watch obligors with debt in troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”)TDR or 90 days or more delinquent debt. Loans to such obligors are considered impaired.

(2)

The Group classifies loans to special attention, intensive control, substantially bankrupt and bankrupt obligors as impaired loans.

(3)

Equivalent obligor ratings are determined for the other portfolio segment.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

The table below presents credit quality information of loans based on the MHFG Group’s internal rating system at March 31, 20162018 and 2017:2019:

 

 Normal obligors Watch obligors excluding
special attention obligors(1)
 Impaired
loans
  Total  Normal obligors Watch obligors excluding
special attention obligors(1)
  Impaired
loans
 Total 
 A-B C-D Retail(2) Other(3) E1-E2 Retail (2) Other (3)  Corporate Retail(2) Other(3) Corporate Retail (2) Other (3) 
 (in millions of yen)  

 

(in millions of yen)

 

2016

                   
2018                 

Domestic:

                 

Manufacturing

 4,859,256  2,681,958  103,343  148,102  163,213  12,473  2,958  373,505  8,344,808  7,705,495  77,947  23,343  197,465  9,775  246  142,070  8,156,341 

Construction and real estate

 3,956,798  2,709,617  601,251  157,057  215,244  16,408  255  76,883  7,733,513  7,317,972  541,778  13,332  172,287  15,466   —    40,833  8,101,668 

Services

 2,611,296  1,674,328  195,140  2,380  81,704  24,846   —    66,010  4,655,704  4,535,793  172,045  141,718  95,223  21,109  55  58,075  5,024,018 

Wholesale and retail

 2,240,228  2,552,552  223,677  57,865  147,404  39,486  546  147,092  5,408,850  4,636,236  177,965  17,305  121,832  27,975  476  130,884  5,112,673 

Transportation and communications

 2,410,967  695,697  86,094  380  35,090  10,518   —    29,156  3,267,902  3,414,781  76,532  1,774  35,339  8,916   —    27,527  3,564,869 

Banks and other financial institutions

 2,719,047  881,405  2,234  3,788  22,303  264   —    3,440  3,632,481  4,244,101  1,640  196,431  16,716  194   —    12,341  4,471,423 

Government and public institutions

 3,181,241  4,047   —    210,496   —     —     —     —    3,395,784  3,010,708   —    5,871,417   —     —     —     —    8,882,125 

Other industries (4)

 1,954,222  685,258  3,501  1,929,712  7,053  329  35,315  3,946  4,619,336  2,716,502  3,536  2,170,442  2,708  259  121,201  3,739  5,018,387 

Individuals

  —    259,646  10,891,538  107,131  34,744  96,729  1,659  122,607  11,514,054  222,410  9,822,244  88,044  23,491  81,550  1,109  90,162  10,329,010 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total domestic

 23,933,055  12,144,508  12,106,778  2,616,911  706,755  201,053  40,733  822,639  52,572,432  37,803,998  10,873,687  8,523,806  665,061  165,244  123,087  505,631  58,660,514 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Foreign:

                 

Commercial and industrial

 9,468,077  4,966,929  46  2,214,584  422,567   —    80,339  166,742  17,319,284  14,192,930  209  2,432,189  398,231   —    64,950  106,650  17,195,159 

Banks and other financial institutions

 5,129,904  550,380   —    656,969  45,196   —     —     —    6,382,449  6,949,036   —    487,978  28,126   —     —     —    7,465,140 

Government and public institutions

 942,366  224,514   —    2,940  4,801   —     —    44  1,174,665  301,072   —     —     —     —     —    1,819  302,891 

Other (4)

  —    6,308  8,336  258,363  132  10  268  278  273,695 

Other

 1,906  9,245  23,730  242  6  1,347  1,160  37,636 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total foreign

 15,540,347  5,748,131  8,382  3,132,856  472,696  10  80,607  167,064  25,150,093  21,444,944  9,454  2,943,897  426,599  6  66,297  109,629  25,000,826 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 39,473,402  17,892,639  12,115,160  5,749,767  1,179,451  201,063  121,340  989,703  77,722,525  59,248,942  10,883,141  11,467,703  1,091,660  165,250  189,384  615,260  83,661,340 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

2017

                   
2019                 

Domestic:

                 

Manufacturing

 5,313,232  2,599,760  90,825  67,734  276,771  11,589  1,314  379,056  8,740,281  9,209,834  69,080  19,805  141,202  8,278  1,303  108,644  9,558,146 

Construction and real estate

 4,199,022  2,641,436  558,321  15,585  165,836  16,023  317  57,476  7,654,016  8,186,308  505,142  15,920  186,753  14,490  25  46,185  8,954,823 

Services

 2,699,487  1,687,515  185,577  910  95,973  23,189  204  66,370  4,759,225  4,761,724  165,643  3,281  90,578  18,586  1  73,573  5,113,386 

Wholesale and retail

 2,244,214  2,369,842  200,003  22,785  124,846  32,911  501  146,901  5,142,003  4,686,541  161,392  26,881  127,695  25,553  591  134,614  5,163,267 

Transportation and communications

 2,584,367  739,781  82,543  1,092  50,319  9,698   —    22,615  3,490,415  3,472,991  71,934  934  37,593  7,472   —    31,206  3,622,130 

Banks and other financial institutions

 3,050,605  887,527  1,894  37,907  21,574  353   —    6,541  4,006,401  4,262,125  1,534  72  28,881  319   —    10,300  4,303,231 

Government and public institutions

 4,059,349  1,600   —    4,471,297   —     —     —     —    8,532,246  2,358,899  5   —     —     —     —     —    2,358,904 

Other industries (4)

 1,873,137  591,109  3,535  1,906,756  4,613  410  41,179  6,610  4,427,349  3,131,072  2,450  2,323,197  7,725  421  3,633  8,954  5,477,452 

Individuals

  —    289,809  10,312,739  80,566  26,288  89,066  1,434  104,702  10,904,604  233,986  9,384,955  64,974  21,127  70,427  1,168  81,168  9,857,805 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total domestic

 26,023,413  11,808,379  11,435,437  6,604,632  766,220  183,239  44,949  790,271  57,656,540  40,303,480  10,362,135  2,455,064  641,554  145,546  6,721  494,644  54,409,144 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Foreign:

                 

Commercial and industrial

 9,310,432  4,814,906  173  2,153,757  312,275   —    90,722  190,183  16,872,448  16,061,655  182  2,488,800  347,060   —    38,404  150,410  19,086,511 

Banks and other financial institutions

 5,628,387  592,380   —    480,806  58,348   —     —     —    6,759,921  8,623,103   —    492,831  10,458   —     —     —    9,126,392 

Government and public institutions

 741,478  214,558   —    1,082  2,801   —     —    29  959,948  296,870   —     —     —     —     —    2  296,872 

Other (4)

  —    6,535  9,439  173,464  124  8  753  401  190,724 

Other

 1,480  9,713  19,690  333   —    879  1,076  33,171 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total foreign

 15,680,297  5,628,379  9,612  2,809,109  373,548  8  91,475  190,613  24,783,041  24,983,108  9,895  3,001,321  357,851   —    39,283  151,488  28,542,946 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 41,703,710  17,436,758  11,445,049  9,413,741  1,139,768  183,247  136,424  980,884  82,439,581  65,286,588  10,372,030  5,456,385  999,405  145,546  46,004  646,132  82,952,090 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

Notes:

Notes:

(1)

Special attention obligors are watch obligors with debt in TDR or 90 days or more delinquent debt. Loans to such obligors are considered impaired.

(2)Amounts represent small balance, homogeneous loans which are subject to pool allocations.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

(2)

The obligor category classification is mainly based on past due status.

(3)

Non-impaired loans held by subsidiaries other than MHBK and MHTB constitute Other, since their portfolio segments are not identical to those of MHBK and MHTB.

(4)

Other industries of Domestic and Other of Foreign includeincludes trade receivables and lease receivables of consolidated VIEs.

Impaired loans

The MHFG Group considers loans to be impaired when it is probable that the Group will be unable to collect all the scheduled payments of principal and interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loans. The Group classifies loans to special attention, intensive control, substantially bankrupt and bankrupt obligors as impaired loans, and all of the Group’s impaired loans are designated as nonaccrual loans. There are no loans that are ninety days past due and still accruing. The Group does not have any loans to borrowers that cause management to have serious doubts as to the ability of such borrowers to comply with the present loan repayment terms for the periods presented other than those already designated as impaired loans. The table below presents impaired loans information at March 31, 20162018 and 2017:2019:

 

 Recorded investment (1) Unpaid
principal
balance 
  Related
allowance (3)
  Average
recorded
investment
  Interest
income
recognized (4)
  Recorded investment (1)  Unpaid
principal
balance 
 Related
allowance (3)
 Average
recorded
investment
 Interest
income
recognized (4)
 
 Requiring an
allowance for
loan losses
 Not
requiring an
allowance
for loan
losses (2)
 Total  Requiring an
allowance for
loan losses
 Not
requiring an
allowance
for loan
losses (2)
 Total 
 (in millions of yen)  

 

(in millions of yen)

 

2016

               

2018

       

Domestic:

              

Manufacturing

 365,361  8,144  373,505  379,642  138,676  410,491  7,930  135,083  6,987  142,070  146,857  45,750  218,899  1,869 

Construction and real estate

 59,883  17,000  76,883  87,516  10,130  89,075  1,246  31,557  9,276  40,833  48,752  4,411  49,926  516 

Services

 56,695  9,315  66,010  72,603  19,095  69,525  1,292  48,691  9,384  58,075  64,348  13,305  60,198  919 

Wholesale and retail

 134,425  12,667  147,092  157,215  46,304  149,324  2,376  119,463  11,421  130,884  139,556  42,798  139,333  1,842 

Transportation and communications

 25,665  3,491  29,156  30,497  5,694  33,119  630  25,019  2,508  27,527  28,480  6,862  25,672  370 

Banks and other financial institutions

 3,390  50  3,440  3,440  1,095  5,188  42  8,392  3,949  12,341  12,341  3,176  8,648  78 

Other industries

 3,591  355  3,946  4,132  799  2,665  64  3,650  89  3,739  3,869  3,563  4,537  53 

Individuals

 63,367  59,240  122,607  135,325  6,085  133,015  2,058  43,326  46,836  90,162  95,338  4,315  97,404  1,402 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total domestic

 712,377  110,262  822,639  870,370  227,878  892,402  15,638  415,181  90,450  505,631  539,541  124,180  604,617  7,049 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Foreign:

              

Total foreign

 148,471  18,593  167,064  180,870  61,308  186,440  2,629 

Total foreign (5)

 63,346  46,283  109,629  125,329  28,333  151,588  1,042 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 860,848  128,855  989,703  1,051,240  289,186  1,078,842  18,267  478,527  136,733  615,260  664,870  152,513  756,205  8,091 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

2017

               

2019

       

Domestic:

              

Manufacturing

 372,241  6,815  379,056  383,812  148,777  375,895  2,859  103,039  5,605  108,644  111,533  39,301  122,764  1,404 

Construction and real estate

 46,130  11,346  57,476  66,006  6,367  66,796  877  36,873  9,312  46,185  51,158  4,661  42,224  487 

Services

 58,366  8,004  66,370  72,261  20,122  66,050  1,173  64,021  9,552  73,573  79,736  16,311  67,679  1,058 

Wholesale and retail

 133,466  13,435  146,901  155,023  52,341  148,865  2,261  124,911  9,703  134,614  147,665  38,763  130,860  1,814 

Transportation and communications

 19,386  3,229  22,615  23,568  5,968  24,035  371  28,297  2,909  31,206  32,139  13,146  29,864  412 

Banks and other financial institutions

 2,601  3,940  6,541  6,873  962  5,305  50  6,473  3,827  10,300  10,300  1,327  10,671  109 

Other industries

 6,484  126  6,610  6,740  1,999  6,053  91  8,867  87  8,954  9,149  5,761  6,042  29 

Individuals

 51,893  52,809  104,702  114,880  4,935  114,104  1,696  37,488  43,680  81,168  88,331  2,630  86,082  1,326 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total domestic

 690,567  99,704  790,271  829,163  241,471  807,103  9,378  409,969  84,675  494,644  530,011  121,900  496,186  6,639 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Foreign:

              

Total foreign

 160,563  30,050  190,613  209,129  61,102  169,192  2,040 

Total foreign (5)

 119,079  32,409  151,488  164,984  47,345  113,559  1,518 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 851,130  129,754  980,884  1,038,292  302,573  976,295  11,418  529,048  117,084  646,132  694,995  169,245  609,745  8,157 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

Notes:

(1)

Amounts represent the outstanding balances of nonaccrual loans. The MHFG Group’s policy for placing loans in nonaccrual status corresponds to the Group’s definition of impaired loans.

(2)

These impaired loans do not require an allowance for loan losses because the MHFG Group has sufficient collateral to cover probable loan losses.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

(3)

The allowance for loan losses on impaired loans includes the allowance for groups of small balance, homogeneous loans which were collectively evaluated for impairment, in addition to the allowance for those loans that were individually evaluated for impairment. The total carrying amount of the groups of small balance, homogeneous loans which were collectively evaluated for impairment at March 31, 20162018 and 20172019 was ¥347,839¥245,809 million and ¥302,251¥257,099 million, respectively.

(4)

Amounts represent grossthe amount of interest income on impaired loans which wererecognized on a cash basis and included in Interest income on loans in the consolidated statements of income.

(5)

The majority of Total foreign consist of Commercial and Industrial loans.

The remaining balance of impaired loans which hadthat have been partially charged off, was ¥31,933¥29,037 million and ¥26,513¥25,097 million as of March 31, 20162018 and 2017,2019, respectively.

Troubled debt restructurings

The MHFG Group considers a TDRloan modification to be a restructuring in which it,TDR when, for economic or legal reasons related to the obligor’s financial difficulties, it grants a concession to the obligor that it would not otherwise consider. The Group considers the relevant obligor to be in financial difficulty generally when its obligor rating is E2 or below. The following table presents TDRsmodified loans that were entered intodetermined to be TDRs during the fiscal years ended March 31, 20162018 and 2017:2019:

 

  Loan forgiveness or debt to
equity swaps
   Interest rate
reduction and/or
postponement of
principal and/or
interest
   Loan forgiveness or debt to
equity swaps
   Interest rate
reduction and/or
postponement of
principal and/or
interest
 
  Recorded
investment (Note)
   Charge-offs     Recorded
investment (1)
   Charge-offs 
      (in millions of yen)           

 

(in millions of yen)

     

2016

            
2018            

Domestic:

            

Manufacturing

   67,058    34,081    108,395    —      —      110,624 

Construction and real estate

   —      —      27,078    —      —      13,430 

Services

   —      —      43,919    —      —      40,774 

Wholesale and retail

   —      —      157,651    —      —      148,560 

Transportation and communications

   49    279    28,244    —      —      27,294 

Banks and other financial institutions

   —      —      6,342    —      —      8,529 

Other industries

   —      —      7,120    —      —      246 

Individuals

   —      —      28,163    —      —      14,960 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total domestic

   67,107    34,360    406,912    —      —      364,417 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Foreign:

            

Total foreign

   —      —      44,748 

Total foreign (2)

   —      —      44,010 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   67,107    34,360    451,660    —      —      408,427 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

2017

            
2019            

Domestic:

            

Manufacturing

   —      —      106,697    —      —      134,544 

Construction and real estate

   —      —      18,818    —      —      39,254 

Services

   —      —      45,287    —      —      87,468 

Wholesale and retail

   —      —      159,649    —      —      167,299 

Transportation and communications

   —      —      17,417    —      —      33,991 

Banks and other financial institutions

   —      —      7,933    —      —      17,286 

Other industries

   —      —      2,518    —      —      120 

Individuals

   —      —      17,067    —      —      42,330 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total domestic

   —      —      375,386    —      —      522,292 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Foreign:

            

Total foreign

   —      —      35,685 

Total foreign (2)

   984    1,964    44,033 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   —      —      411,071    984    1,964    566,325 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Note: Amounts represent the book values of loans immediately after the restructurings.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Notes:

(1)

Amounts represent the book values of loans immediately after the restructurings.

(2)

The majority of Total foreign consist of Commercial and Industrial loans.

Payment default is deemed to occur when the loan becomes three months past due or the obligor is downgraded to the category of substantially bankrupt or bankrupt. The following table presents payment defaults which occurred during the fiscal years ended March 31, 20162018 and 20172019 with respect to the loans modified as TDRs within the previous twelve months:

 

  Recorded investment   Recorded investment 
      2016           2017       

 

    2018    

       2019     
  (in millions of yen)   (in millions of yen) 

Domestic:

        

Manufacturing

   10,669    5,164    4,019    1,173 

Construction and real estate

   2,195    2,887    80    121 

Services

   4,824    4,471    4,469    1,335 

Wholesale and retail

   20,522    10,116    25,710    15,087 

Transportation and communications

   2,361    795    264    878 

Banks and other financial institutions

   —      66 

Other industries

   —      14    130    1,650 

Individuals

   3,864    2,288    1,819    2,152 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total domestic

   44,435    25,735    36,491    22,462 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Foreign:

        

Total foreign

   10,846    3,213    4,588    5,418 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   55,281    28,948    41,079    27,880 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Age analysis of past due loans

The table below presents an analysis of the age of the recorded investment in loans that are past due at March 31, 20162018 and 2017:2019:

 

  30-59 days
past due
   60-89 days
past due
   90 days or
more past due
   Total past
due
   Current   Total   30-59 days
past due
   60-89 days
past due
   90 days or
more past due
   Total past
due
   Current   Total 
  (in millions of yen)   

 

(in millions of yen)

 

2016

  

2018

  

Domestic:

                        

Manufacturing

   1,555    163    9,454    11,172    8,333,636    8,344,808    585    470    8,037    9,092    8,147,249    8,156,341 

Construction and real estate

   2,713    1,024    35,691    39,428    7,694,085    7,733,513    1,641    474    28,633    30,748    8,070,920    8,101,668 

Services

   2,479    223    7,016    9,718    4,645,986    4,655,704    1,977    1,142    5,051    8,170    5,015,848    5,024,018 

Wholesale and retail

   3,193    886    8,861    12,940    5,395,910    5,408,850    1,704    1,083    6,639    9,426    5,103,247    5,112,673 

Transportation and communications

   594    81    2,033    2,708    3,265,194    3,267,902    356    639    1,828    2,823    3,562,046    3,564,869 

Banks and other financial institutions

   —      —      —      —      3,632,481    3,632,481    —      1,301    —      1,301    4,470,122    4,471,423 

Government and public institutions

   —      —      —      —      3,395,784    3,395,784    —      —      —      —      8,882,125    8,882,125 

Other industries

   —      —      29    29    4,619,307    4,619,336    33    12    37    82    5,018,305    5,018,387 

Individuals

   38,682    13,570    38,413    90,665    11,423,389    11,514,054    31,566    12,426    31,444    75,436    10,253,574    10,329,010 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total domestic

   49,216    15,947    101,497    166,660    52,405,772    52,572,432    37,862    17,547    81,669    137,078    58,523,436    58,660,514 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Foreign:

                        

Total foreign

   859    2,598    30,000    33,457    25,116,636    25,150,093 

Total foreign (Note)

   897    450    41,316    42,663    24,958,163    25,000,826 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   50,075    18,545    131,497    200,117    77,522,408    77,722,525    38,759    17,997    122,985    179,741    83,481,599    83,661,340 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

2017

  

2019

  

Domestic:

                        

Manufacturing

   1,938    360    7,767    10,065    8,730,216    8,740,281    2,210    513    7,036    9,759    9,548,387    9,558,146 

Construction and real estate

   2,818    947    32,523    36,288    7,617,728    7,654,016    1,010    1,054    31,092    33,156    8,921,667    8,954,823 

Services

   917    217    5,914    7,048    4,752,177    4,759,225    633    196    3,494    4,323    5,109,063    5,113,386 

Wholesale and retail

   1,330    2,834    5,585    9,749    5,132,254    5,142,003    1,614    1,415    7,868    10,897    5,152,370    5,163,267 

Transportation and communications

   384    322    1,859    2,565    3,487,850    3,490,415    363    256    2,119    2,738    3,619,392    3,622,130 

Banks and other financial institutions

   —      —      —      —      4,006,401    4,006,401    3    484    6    493    4,302,738    4,303,231 

Government and public institutions

   —      —      —      —      8,532,246    8,532,246    —      —      —      —      2,358,904    2,358,904 

Other industries

   —      —      69    69    4,427,280    4,427,349    2    —      57    59    5,477,393    5,477,452 

Individuals

   32,995    12,291    34,846    80,132    10,824,472    10,904,604    27,139    11,013    28,965    67,117    9,790,688    9,857,805 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total domestic

   40,382    16,971    88,563    145,916    57,510,624    57,656,540    32,974    14,931    80,637    128,542    54,280,602    54,409,144 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Foreign:

                        

Total foreign

   546    216    95,719    96,481    24,686,560    24,783,041 

Total foreign (Note)

   668    211    26,316    27,195    28,515,751    28,542,946 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   40,928    17,187    184,282    242,397    82,197,184    82,439,581    33,642    15,142    106,953    155,737    82,796,353    82,952,090 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Note:

The majority of Total foreign consist of Commercial and Industrial loans.

6. Allowance for loan losses

In accordance with ASC 450, a formula-based allowance utilizing historical loss factors, after adjusting for existing economic conditions where appropriate, is applied to groups ofnon-homogeneous loans and small balance, homogeneous loans which have not been identified as impaired. At MHBK and MHTB, when management estimates probable credit losses to determine the allowance for loan losses, small balance, homogeneous loans are classified in the retail portfolio segment, to which pool allocations apply, and loans other than these classified in the retail portfolio segment are classified in the corporate portfolio segment. The corporate portfolio segment consists of loans originated by MHBK and MHTB, and includes mainly business loans such as those used for working capital and capital expenditure, as well as loans for which the primary source of repayment of the obligation is income generated by the relevant assets such as project finance, asset

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

as project finance, asset finance and real estate finance. The retail portfolio segment consists mainly of residential mortgage loans, originated by MHBK. The other portfolio segment consists of loans of subsidiaries other than MHBK and MHTB, such as consolidated VIEs and overseas subsidiaries. See Note 1 “Basis of presentation and summary of significant accounting policies” for further details of the methodology used to determine the allowance for loan losses and Note 5 “Loans” for further details of obligor ratings and pool allocations.

Changes in Allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2015, 20162017, 2018 and 20172019 are shown below:

 

  Corporate Retail Other Total 
  (in millions of yen) 

2015

     

Balance at beginning of fiscal year

   501,349  95,542  29,286  626,177 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Provision (credit) for loan losses

   (40,167 (33,261 13,205  (60,223
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Charge-offs

   (64,634 (3,266 (11,322 (79,222

Recoveries

   19,086  1,454  2,743  23,283 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net charge-offs

   (45,548 (1,812 (8,579 (55,939
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Others(Note)

   7,543   —    2,701  10,244 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at end of fiscal year

   423,177  60,469  36,613  520,259 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

2016

     

Balance at beginning of fiscal year

   423,177  60,469  36,613  520,259 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Provision (credit) for loan losses

   33,532  (15,474 16,502  34,560 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Charge-offs

   (97,536 (2,173 (12,610 (112,319

Recoveries

   17,232  1,399  2,034  20,665 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net charge-offs

   (80,304 (774 (10,576 (91,654
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Others(Note)

   (8,666  —    (3,252 (11,918
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at end of fiscal year

   367,739  44,221  39,287  451,247 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   Corporate Retail Other Total 
  

 

(in millions of yen)

 

2017

          

Balance at beginning of fiscal year

   367,739  44,221  39,287  451,247    367,739  44,221  39,287  451,247 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Provision (credit) for loan losses

   45,059  (10,666 3,275  37,668    45,059  (10,666 3,275  37,668 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Charge-offs

   (22,901 (1,754 (6,597 (31,252   (22,901 (1,754 (6,597 (31,252

Recoveries

   18,320  5,122  2,158  25,600    18,320  5,122  2,158  25,600 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net charge-offs

   (4,581 3,368  (4,439 (5,652   (4,581 3,368  (4,439 (5,652
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Others(Note)

   (890  —    (2,700 (3,590   (890  —    (2,700 (3,590
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at end of fiscal year

   407,327  36,923  35,423  479,673    407,327  36,923  35,423  479,673 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2018

     

Balance at beginning of fiscal year

   407,327  36,923  35,423  479,673 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Provision (credit) for loan losses

   (123,470 (7,427 4,535  (126,362
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Charge-offs

   (44,621 (2,118 (9,123 (55,862

Recoveries

   12,924  814  1,482  15,220 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net charge-offs

   (31,697 (1,304 (7,641 (40,642
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Others(Note)

   (3,088  —    321  (2,767
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at end of fiscal year

   249,072  28,192  32,638  309,902 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

2019

     

Balance at beginning of fiscal year

   249,072  28,192  32,638  309,902 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Provision (credit) for loan losses

   31,693  (2,658 3,424  32,459 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Charge-offs

   (39,728 (2,856 (4,940 (47,524

Recoveries

   11,019  552  2,532  14,103 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net charge-offs

   (28,709 (2,304 (2,408 (33,421
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Others(Note)

   847   —    (2,586 (1,739
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at end of fiscal year

        252,903         23,230         31,068       307,201 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

Note:

Others includes primarily foreign exchange translation.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

The table below presents Allowance for loan losses and loans outstanding by portfolio segment disaggregated on the basis of impairment method at March 31, 20162018 and 2017:2019:

 

  Corporate   Retail   Other   Total   Corporate Retail Other Total 
  (in millions of yen)   

 

(in millions of yen)

 

2016

        

2018

     

Allowance for loan losses

   367,739    44,221    39,287    451,247    249,072  28,192  32,638  309,902 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

of which individually evaluated for impairment

   222,591    3,829    12,521    238,941    129,789  2,602  7,383  139,774 

of which collectively evaluated for impairment

   145,148    40,392    26,766    212,306    119,283   25,590   25,255   170,128  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Loans(Note)

   59,385,962    12,414,453    5,922,110    77,722,525    60,837,559  11,133,862  11,689,919  83,661,340 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

of which individually evaluated for impairment

   634,049    24,768    63,280    722,097    593,053  21,364  61,023  675,440 

of which collectively evaluated for impairment

   58,751,913    12,389,685    5,858,830    77,000,428    60,244,506  11,112,498  11,628,896  82,985,900 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

2017

        

2019

     

Allowance for loan losses

   407,327    36,923    35,423    479,673    252,903  23,230  31,068  307,201 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

of which individually evaluated for impairment

   272,714    2,922    13,306    288,942    139,472  2,122  8,933  150,527 

of which collectively evaluated for impairment

   134,613    34,001    22,117    190,731    113,431  21,108  22,135  156,674 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Loans(Note)

   61,120,654    11,722,726    9,596,201    82,439,581    66,804,088  10,596,994  5,551,008  82,952,090 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

of which individually evaluated for impairment

   772,647    23,422    65,075    861,144    539,893  20,886  54,319  615,098 

of which collectively evaluated for impairment

   60,348,007    11,699,304    9,531,126    81,578,437    66,264,195  10,576,108  5,496,689  82,336,992 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

Note:

Note: Amounts represent loan balances before deducting unearned income and deferred loan fees.

In the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015, Credit for loan losses decreased by ¥66,007 million from the previous fiscal year. The decrease was due primarily to an increase in allowance for loan losses on impaired loans related to certain domestic borrowers, although the MHFG Group continued to record a credit for loan losses and recorded a decrease in allowance for loan losses onnon-impaired loans as a result of upgrades in the obligor categories of a broad range of borrowers, reflecting the continuing gradual recovery of the Japanese economy.

In the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016, Provision for loan losses increased by ¥94,783 million from the previous fiscal year. The MHFG Group recorded a modest level of Provision for loan losses, reflecting how the Japanese economy was in a “leveling off” phase.

In the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, Provision for loan losses increased by ¥3,108 million from the previous fiscal year. Although obligor categories improved as a whole, reflecting the gradual recovery in the economic environment, Provision for loan losses increased due mainly to the deterioration of credit status of certain borrowers.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

7. Premises and equipment

Premises and equipment at March 31, 20162018 and 20172019 consist of the following:

 

  2016   2017   2018   2019 
  (in millions of yen)   

 

(in millions of yen)

 

Land

   552,205    575,054    566,040    563,032 

Buildings

   827,458    807,312    811,911    826,781 

Equipment and furniture

   463,205    485,407    484,102    472,186 

Leasehold improvements

   88,195    93,967    97,066    97,508 

Construction in progress

   20,656    23,093    25,849    37,174 

Software

   1,086,124    1,308,292    1,463,786    1,366,481 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   3,037,843    3,293,125    3,448,754    3,363,162 

Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization

   1,199,853    1,251,852    1,332,570    1,462,210 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Premises and equipment—net

   1,837,990    2,041,273    2,116,184    1,900,952 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Depreciation and amortization expense for premises and equipment for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2015, 20162017, 2018 and 20172019 was ¥161,152¥163,769 million, ¥162,676¥169,346 million and ¥163,769¥345,560 million, respectively.

Premises and equipment under capital leases, which is primarily comprised of data processing equipment, amounted to ¥69,077¥83,734 million and ¥80,430¥83,935 million at March 31, 20162018 and 2017,2019, respectively. Accumulated depreciation and amortization on such premises and equipment at March 31, 20162018 and 20172019 amounted to ¥34,733¥42,158 million and ¥40,155¥57,193 million, respectively.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Depreciation and amortization expense related to Software was reported in General and administrative expenses, and all other depreciation and amortization expense was reported in Occupancy expenses.

The MHFG Group recognized impairment losses of ¥27,428 million on premises and equipment for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019, of which ¥8,910 million was recorded in General and administrative expenses and ¥18,518 million was recorded in Occupancy expenses. Such losses included ¥15,761 million of impairment losses primarily on real estate recognized in Retail & Business Banking Company due to revisions of branch network strategy including schedule to close branches.

8. Goodwill and intangible assets

Goodwill

The changes in Goodwill during the fiscal years ended March 31, 2015, 20162017, 2018 and 20172019 are as follows:

 

  2015   2016 2017   2017 2018   2019 
  (in millions of yen)   

 

(in millions of yen)

 

Balance at beginning of fiscal year

   11,549    11,703  19,097    19,097  95,176    95,184 

Goodwill acquired

   —      16,470 (1)   76,225 (2)    76,225 (1)   —      —   

Impairment losses recognized

   —      (6,222  —   

Foreign exchange translation

   154    (2,854 (146   (146 8    (33

Balance at end of fiscal year

   11,703    19,097  95,176    95,176  95,184    95,151 
  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

Gross amount of goodwill (3)

   81,254    94,473  171,432 

Gross amount of goodwill(2)

   171,432  170,926    169,489 

Accumulated impairment losses

   69,551    75,376  76,256    76,256  75,742    74,338 

 

Notes:

(1)Goodwill acquired is entirely related to the acquisition of Simplex Real Estate Management Inc. and Simplex REIT Partners Inc.
(2)

Goodwill acquired is entirely related to the acquisition of Asset Management One (see Note 3 “Business combination”).

(3)(2)

Goodwill is recorded at a designated reporting unit level for the purpose of assessing impairment. Goodwill is not allocated to the reportable segments in Note 32 “Business segment information”.

Due to the prolonged severe business environment for Banco Mizuho do Brasil S.A., it was determined that the carrying amount of the Banco Mizuho do Brasil S.A. reporting unit exceeded its fair value, which is based on the market approach. Therefore, a goodwill impairment loss of ¥6,222 million was recognized during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Intangible assets

The table below presents the gross carrying amount, accumulated amortization and net carrying amount of intangible assets, at March 31, 20162018 and 2017:2019:

 

 2016 2017  2018 2019 
 Gross
carrying
amount
 Accumulated
amortization
 Net
carrying
amount
 Gross
carrying
amount
 Accumulated
amortization
 Net
carrying
amount
  Gross
carrying
amount
 Accumulated
amortization
 Net
carrying
amount
 Gross
carrying
amount
 Accumulated
amortization
 Net
carrying
amount
 
 (in millions of yen)  

 

(in millions of yen)

 

Intangible assets subject to amortization:

            

Customer relationships(Note)

 73,949  35,178  38,771  126,979  42,517  84,462  126,979  52,237  74,742  126,882  61,630  65,252 

Other

 2,864  2,208  656  2,814  2,190  624  1,847  1,341  506  1,698  1,412  286 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 76,813  37,386  39,427  129,793  44,707  85,086  128,826  53,578  75,248  128,580  63,042  65,538 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Intangible assets not subject to amortization:

            

Total

 9,224   —    9,224  9,061   —    9,061  9,199   —    9,199  8,702   —    8,702 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 86,037  37,386  48,651  138,854  44,707  94,147  138,025  53,578  84,447  137,282  63,042  74,240 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

Note:

Customer relationships were acquired in connection with the merger of MHSC and Shinko on May 7, 2009 and the integration among asset management companies on October 1, 2016, see Note 3 “Business

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

combination” for further details of the integration among asset management companies. See Note 1 “Basis of presentation and summary of significant accounting policies” for further information.

For the fiscal years ended March 31, 2015, 2016,2017, 2018, and 2017,2019, the MHFG Group recognized ¥5,376¥7,433 million, ¥5,254¥9,812 million, and ¥7,433¥9,604 million, respectively, of amortization expense in respect of intangible assets.assets, reported in Other noninterest expenses.

The table below presents the estimated aggregate amortization expense in respect of intangible assets for the next five years:

 

  (in millions of yen)   (in millions of yen) 

Fiscal year ending March 31:

    

2018

   9,465 

2019

   9,243 

2020

   8,940    8,969 

2021

   8,232    8,237 

2022

   7,699    7,702 

2023

   7,184 

2024

   6,666 

9. Pledged assets and collateral

The following amounts, by balance sheet classification, have been pledged as collateral for borrowings and for other purposes at March 31, 20162018 and 2017:2019:

 

   2016   2017 
   (in billions of yen) 

Interest-bearing deposits in other banks

   69    51 

Trading account assets

   7,939    6,577 

Investments

   10,254    8,213 

Loans

   5,871    7,468 

Other assets

   1,322    1,588 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   25,455    23,897 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

   2018   2019 
   

 

(in billions of yen)

 

Interest-bearing deposits in other banks

   37    68 

Trading account assets

   5,611    4,137 

Investments

   6,500    6,076 

Loans

   5,229    4,055 

Other assets

   2,099    1,886 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   19,476    16,222 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The associated liabilities collateralized by the above assets at March 31, 20162018 and 20172019 are summarized below:

 

  2016   2017   2018   2019 
  (in billions of yen)   

 

(in billions of yen)

 

Deposits

   813    919    256    386 

Payables under repurchase agreements

   6,182    6,109    5,518    3,435 

Payables under securities lending transactions

   2,790    1,460    1,193    1,675 

Other short-term borrowings

   657    686    441    519 

Long-term debt

   5,545    4,220    3,179    1,431 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   15,987    13,394    10,587      7,446 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

The Bank of Japan (“the BOJ”) requires private depository institutions to maintain a certain amount of funds as reserves in current accounts with the BOJ, based on average deposit balances and certain other factors. There are similar reserve deposit requirements for foreign branches and subsidiaries engaged in banking businesses in foreign countries. At March 31, 20162018 and 2017,2019, the deposit amounts maintained with the BOJ and foreign central banks, which were included in Cash and due from banks and Interest-bearing deposits in other banks, were ¥34,377

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

¥45,325 billion and ¥44,741¥43,552 billion, respectively. These balances included the reserve funds required to be maintained by the MHFG Group, which amounted to ¥1,322¥1,589 billion and ¥1,462¥1,583 billion at March 31, 20162018 and 2017,2019, respectively.

At March 31, 20162018 and 2017,2019, the MHFG Group had received collateral that can be sold or repledged, with a fair value of ¥12,116¥13,419 billion and ¥13,395¥16,114 billion, respectively, of which ¥11,616¥12,655 billion and ¥12,988¥12,264 billion, respectively, was sold and repledged. Such collateral was primarily obtained in connection with resale or securities borrowing agreements, and was generally used as collateral for repurchase or securities lending agreements, or to cover short sales.

10. Deposits

The balances of time deposits and certificates of deposit issued by domestic offices in amounts of ¥10 million (approximately US$90 thousand at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s noon buying rate on March 31, 2017)2019) or more and the balances of these deposits issued by foreign offices in amounts of US$100,000 or more at March 31, 20162018 and 20172019 are as follows:

 

  2016   2017   2018   2019 
  (in millions of yen)   

 

(in millions of yen)

 

Domestic offices:

        

Time deposits

   19,209,570    17,763,052    17,194,707    16,578,642 

Certificates of deposit

   6,432,810    5,877,100    5,778,430    5,643,303 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   25,642,380    23,640,152    22,973,137    22,221,945 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Foreign offices:

        

Time deposits

   12,708,142    14,862,230    13,426,554    17,606,520 

Certificates of deposit

   5,394,695    4,754,170    5,604,160    7,695,240 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   18,102,837    19,616,400    19,030,714    25,301,760 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

The aggregate amount of demand deposits in overdraft status that have been reclassified as loan balances at March 31, 20162018 and 20172019 was ¥890¥792 billion and ¥718¥810 billion, respectively.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

The balance and remaining maturities of time deposits and certificates of deposit issued by domestic and foreign offices at March 31, 20172019 are shown in the following table:

 

  Time
deposits
   Certificates of
deposit
   Total   Time
deposits
   Certificates of
deposit
   Total 
  (in millions of yen)   

 

(in millions of yen)

 

Domestic offices:

            

Due in one year or less

   22,800,247    5,821,000    28,621,247    21,240,581    5,492,603    26,733,184 

Due after one year through two years

   2,024,310    56,100    2,080,410    1,709,682    150,700    1,860,382 

Due after two years through three years

   1,206,888    —      1,206,888    1,387,191    —      1,387,191 

Due after three years through four years

   349,896    —      349,896    319,829    —      319,829 

Due after four years through five years

   346,569    —      346,569    371,921    —      371,921 

Due after five years

   133,581    —      133,581    245,455    —      245,455 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   26,861,491    5,877,100    32,738,591    25,274,659    5,643,303    30,917,962 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Foreign offices:

            

Due in one year or less

   14,765,251    4,599,583    19,364,834    17,525,778    7,468,492    24,994,270 

Due after one year through two years

   88,304    38,709    127,013    65,423    162,721    228,144 

Due after two years through three years

   5,740    55,818    61,558    3,902    64,055    67,957 

Due after three years through four years

   —      60,067    60,067    775    —      775 

Due after four years through five years

   198    —      198    11,369    —      11,369 

Due after five years

   8,956    —      8,956    11,122    —      11,122 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   14,868,449    4,754,177    19,622,626    17,618,369    7,695,268    25,313,637 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   41,729,940    10,631,277    52,361,217    42,893,028    13,338,571    56,231,599 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

11. Due to trust accounts

MHTB and TCSB, which are MHFG’s trust bank subsidiaries, holdholds assets on behalf of theirits customers in an agent, fiduciary or trust capacity. Such trust account assets are not the MHFG Group’s proprietary assets and are managed and accounted for separately. However, the cash in individual trust accounts is often placed with MHTB and TCSB for the customers’ short-term investment needs. These amounts which MHTB and TCSB oweowes to the trust accounts are recorded as Due to trust accounts.

The MHFG Group consolidates certain guaranteed principal money trusts. See Note 25 “Variable interest entities and securitizations” for further discussion of the guaranteed principal money trusts.

12. Short-term borrowings andlong-term debt

Short-term borrowings

Short-term borrowings consist of Due to trust accounts, Call money and funds purchased, Payables under repurchase agreements and securities lending transactions, and Other short-term borrowings.

Details of Other short-term borrowings at March 31, 20162018 and 20172019 are as follows:

 

  2016   2017   2018   2019 
  (in millions of yen)   

 

(in millions of yen)

 

Commercial paper and short-term notes issued by consolidated VIEs of asset-backed commercial paper programs(1) (2)

   289,219    59,607 

Commercial paper and short-term notes issued by MHFG and its subsidiaries(1) (3)

   1,369,302    956,447 

Short-term notes issued by consolidated VIEs of asset-backed commercial paper programs(1)

   27,985    22,339 

Commercial paper and short-term notes issued by MHFG’s subsidiaries(1) (2)

   1,044,591    1,274,382 

Borrowings from the Bank of Japan

   324,146    355,255    432,328    508,627 

Other

   97,372    105,303    183,114    189,478 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   2,080,039    1,476,612      1,688,018      1,994,826 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

 

Notes:

(1)

Short-term notes are issued under the laws of Japan in the form of dematerialized commercial paper, whose characteristics are economically the same as commercial paper.

(2)Commercial

The amounts of commercial paper and short-term notes issued by consolidated VIEs of asset-backed commercial paper programs in the above table consist of commercial paper and short-term notes, of which the amountsMHFG’s subsidiaries were ¥232,538¥710,391 million and ¥56,681¥334,200 million, respectively, at March 31, 2016,2018, and ¥24,559¥941,182 million and ¥35,048¥333,200 million, respectively, at March 31, 2017.

(3)Commercial paper and short-term notes issued by MHFG and its subsidiaries in the above table consist of commercial paper and short-term notes, of which the amounts were ¥777,602 million and ¥591,700 million, respectively, at March 31, 2016, and ¥765,147 million and ¥191,300 million, respectively, at March 31, 2017.2019.

Long-term debt

Long-term debt with original maturities of more than one year at March 31, 20162018 and 20172019 is comprised of the following:

 

  2016   2017   2018   2019 
  (in millions of yen)   

 

(in millions of yen)

 

Obligations under capital leases

   37,811    40,947    36,010    25,020 

Loan participation borrowings

   64,524    90,639    89,353    142,838 

Senior borrowings and bonds

   11,576,384    11,119,136    9,184,075    7,503,032 

Subordinated borrowings and bonds

   3,086,808    3,278,692    3,645,792    3,858,510 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   14,765,527    14,529,414    12,955,230    11,529,400 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

The following table presents the interest rates and maturities of senior borrowings and bonds, and subordinated borrowings and bonds:

 

 Interest rates (1) Maturities (2) 2016 2017  Interest rates (1) Maturities (2) 2018 2019 
 (%)   (in millions of yen)  (%)   

 

(in millions of yen)

 

Senior borrowings and bonds:

        

fixed rate denominated in Japanese yen

 0.00-10.00  Apr. 2017-Dec. 2046  7,863,984  6,011,939  0.00-8.10  Apr.2019-Dec. 2046  4,146,989  2,057,156 

fixed rate denominated in U.S. dollars

 0.00-7.49  Apr. 2017-Aug. 2046  1,778,892  2,533,715  0.00-5.39  Apr.2019-Mar. 2048  2,519,845  2,765,247 

fixed rate denominated in other currencies

 0.01-10.00  Apr. 2017-May. 2037  135,515  172,370  0.02-12.40  Apr. 2019-May. 2037  233,842  324,162 

floating rate denominated in Japanese yen

 0.00-23.80  Apr.2017-Mar. 2047  852,425  717,056  0.00-25.00  Apr.2019-Mar. 2049  662,751  656,029 

floating rate denominated in U.S. dollars

 0.00-10.00  Apr.2017-Jul. 2033  898,840  1,557,288  0.00-16.00  Apr.2019-Jul. 2033  1,469,248  1,493,617 

floating rate denominated in other currencies

 0.00-9.40  Aug.2017-Sep. 2035  46,728  126,768  0.00-9.00  Apr.2019-Mar. 2024  151,400  206,821 
   

 

  

 

    

 

  

 

 

Total

   11,576,384  11,119,136    9,184,075  7,503,032 
   

 

  

 

    

 

  

 

 

Subordinated borrowings and bonds:

        

fixed rate denominated in Japanese yen

 0.50-4.26  Apr. 2017-Perpetual  2,596,460  2,858,445  0.40-4.26  Jun. 2019-Perpetual  3,247,639  3,442,438 

fixed rate denominated in U.S. dollars

 4.30-4.70  Jul.2022-Oct. 2025  490,348  420,247  4.30-4.70  Jul.2022-Oct. 2025  398,153  416,072 
   

 

  

 

    

 

  

 

 

Total

   3,086,808  3,278,692    3,645,792  3,858,510 
   

 

  

 

    

 

  

 

 

Total

   14,663,192  14,397,828    12,829,867  11,361,542 
   

 

  

 

    

 

  

 

 

 

Notes:

(1)

The interest rates disclosed reflect the range of contractual rates in effect at March 31, 2017.2019.

(2)

Maturity information disclosed is the range of maturities at March 31, 2017.2019.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(3)

None of the long-term debt issuances above are convertible to common stock.

(4)

Certain debt agreements permit the MHFG Group to redeem the related debt, in whole or in part, prior to maturity at the MHFG Group’s option on terms specified in the respective agreements.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The following is a summary of the contractual maturities of long-term debt subsequent to March 31, 2017:2019:

 

  (in millions of yen)   (in millions of yen) 

Fiscal year ending March 31:

    

2018

   1,614,386 

2019

   3,127,227 

2020

   1,733,501    1,401,583 

2021

   1,841,416    1,443,458 

2022

   1,194,536    1,319,030 

2023 and thereafter

   5,018,348 

2023

   1,176,818 

2024

   508,821 

2025 and thereafter

   5,679,690 
  

 

   

 

 

Total

   14,529,414    11,529,400 
  

 

   

 

 

13. Other assets and liabilities

The following table sets forth the details of other assets and liabilities at March 31, 20162018 and 2017:2019:

 

   2016   2017 
   (in millions of yen) 

Other assets:

    

Accounts receivable from brokers, dealers and customers for securities transactions

   1,718,769    1,564,295 

Collateral provided for derivative transactions

   884,651    973,404 

Prepaid pension cost

   612,102    682,592 

Miscellaneous receivables

   286,896    324,135 

Margins provided for futures contracts

   225,240    276,398 

Security deposits

   113,066    122,858 

Loans held for sale

   33,133    26,689 

Other

   823,033    1,021,958 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   4,696,890    4,992,329 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other liabilities:

    

Accounts payable to brokers, dealers and customers for securities transactions

   2,882,824    1,400,141 

Guaranteed trust principal

   623,904    683,324 

Collateral accepted for derivative transactions

   715,894    671,691 

Miscellaneous payables

   442,352    481,809 

Margins accepted for futures contracts

   334,925    307,066 

Unearned income

   144,903    134,666 

Factoring amounts owed to customers

   242,392    53,488 

Other

   1,089,529    1,294,340 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   6,476,723    5,026,525 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

   2018   2019 
   

 

(in millions of yen)

 

Other assets:

    

Accounts receivable:

    

Receivables from brokers, dealers and customers for securities transactions (1)

   1,578,952    1,517,235 

Other

   368,030    400,676 

Collateral pledged:

    

Collateral pledged for derivative transactions

   981,390    856,439 

Margins provided for futures contracts

   142,156    159,747 

Other

   965,137    857,814 

Prepaid pension cost

   874,191    850,472 

Security deposits

   126,001    123,317 

Loans held for sale

   86,153    24,921 

Other

   609,624    485,383 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   5,731,634    5,276,004 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other liabilities:

    

Accounts payable:

    

Payables to brokers, dealers and customers for securities transactions (1)

   1,410,785    2,572,315 

Other

   455,789    442,776 

Guaranteed trust principal (2)

   761,685    809,450 

Collateral accepted:

    

Collateral accepted for derivative transactions

   598,524    589,411 

Margins accepted for futures contracts

   325,038    339,863 

Unearned income (3)

   130,916    126,594 

Other

   1,022,858    1,052,297 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   4,705,595    5,932,706 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

Guaranteed trust principal
Notes:

(1)

Receivables from brokers, dealers and customers for securities transactions included ¥372,395 million and ¥555,938 million of such receivables of consolidated VIEs at March 31, 2018 and 2019, respectively.

Guaranteed trust principal is the liability of certain consolidated trust arrangements, in respect of which the MHFG Group provides guarantees for the repayment of principal. See Note 25 “Variable interest entities and securitizations” for further discussion of the guaranteed principal money trusts.

Unearned income

Unearned income is primarily comprised of refundable fees received from consumer loan customers at the time the loans were made, which is being deferred and recognized in earnings as earned.

14. Preferred stock

The composition of preferred stock at March 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017 is as follows:

2015

  Aggregate amount  Number of shares  Liquidation
value per share
  Convertible
or not
 

Class of stock

   Authorized  Issued  In treasury   
   (in millions of yen)           (in yen)    

Eleventh series class XI preferred stock (1)

   914,752   914,752,000   914,752,000   701,631,100   1,000   Yes 

First series class XIV preferred stock(2)

   —     900,000,000   —     —     —     —   

Second series class XIV preferred stock(2)

   —     900,000,000   —     —     —     —   

Third series class XIV preferred stock(2)

   —     900,000,000   —     —     —     —   

Fourth series class XIV preferred stock(2)

   —     900,000,000   —     —     —     —   

First series class XV preferred stock(3)

   —     900,000,000   —     —     —     —   

Second series class XV preferred stock(3)

   —     900,000,000   —     —     —     —   

Third series class XV preferred stock(3)

   —     900,000,000   —     —     —     —   

Fourth series class XV preferred stock(3)

   —     900,000,000   —     —     —     —   

First series class XVI preferred stock(4)

   —     1,500,000,000   —     —     —     —   

Second series class XVI preferred stock(4)

   —     1,500,000,000   —     —     —     —   

Third series class XVI preferred stock(4)

   —     1,500,000,000   —     —     —     —   

Fourth series class XVI preferred stock(4)

   —     1,500,000,000   —     —     —     —   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

Total

   914,752   4,214,752,000   914,752,000   701,631,100   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

2016

 Aggregate amount  Number of shares  Liquidation
value per share
  Convertible
or not
 

Class of stock

  Authorized  Issued  In treasury   
  (in millions of yen)           (in yen)    

Eleventh series class XI preferred stock (1)

  914,752   914,752,000   914,752,000   815,828,400   1,000   Yes 

First series class XIV preferred stock(2)

  —     900,000,000   —     —     —     —   

Second series class XIV preferred stock(2)

  —     900,000,000   —     —     —     —   

Third series class XIV preferred stock(2)

  —     900,000,000   —     —     —     —   

Fourth series class XIV preferred stock(2)

  —     900,000,000   —     —     —     —   

First series class XV preferred stock(3)

  —     900,000,000   —     —     —     —   

Second series class XV preferred stock(3)

  —     900,000,000   —     —     —     —   

Third series class XV preferred stock(3)

  —     900,000,000   —     —     —     —   

Fourth series class XV preferred stock(3)

  —     900,000,000   —     —     —     —   

First series class XVI preferred stock(4)

  —     1,500,000,000   —     —     —     —   

Second series class XVI preferred stock(4)

  —     1,500,000,000   —     —     —     —   

Third series class XVI preferred stock(4)

  —     1,500,000,000   —     —     —     —   

Fourth series class XVI preferred stock(4)

  —     1,500,000,000   —     —     —     —   
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

Total

   914,752   4,214,752,000   914,752,000   815,828,400   
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

2017

Aggregate amountNumberPayables to brokers, dealers and customers for securities transactions included ¥422,060 million and ¥620,766 million of sharesLiquidation
value per share
Convertible
or not

Classsuch payables of stock

AuthorizedIssuedIn treasury
(in millions of yen)(in yen)

Class XI preferred stock

        —  914,752,000              —                —     —  —  

First series class XIV preferred stock(2)

—  900,000,000—  —  —  —  

Second series class XIV preferred stock(2)

—  900,000,000—  —  —  —  

Third series class XIV preferred stock(2)

—  900,000,000—  —  —  —  

Fourth series class XIV preferred stock(2)

—  900,000,000—  —  —  —  

First series class XV preferred stock(3)

—  900,000,000—  —  —  —  

Second series class XV preferred stock(3)

—  900,000,000—  —  —  —  

Third series class XV preferred stock(3)

—  900,000,000—  —  —  —  

Fourth series class XV preferred stock(3)

—  900,000,000—  —  —  —  

First series class XVI preferred stock(4)

—  1,500,000,000—  —  —  —  

Second series class XVI preferred stock(4)

—  1,500,000,000—  —  —  —  

Third series class XVI preferred stock(4)

—  1,500,000,000—  —  —  —  

Fourth series class XVI preferred stock(4)

—  1,500,000,000—  —  —  —  

Total

—  4,214,752,000              —                —  

Notes:

(1)The aggregate amountconsolidated VIEs at March 31, 2018 and number of issued shares include the preferred stock in treasury which has been converted into common stock but not yet cancelled.2019, respectively.
(2)The total number

Guaranteed trust principal is the liability of authorized shares from first to fourth series class XIV preferred stock shall not exceed 900,000,000.certain consolidated trust arrangements that meet the definition of a VIE for which the MHFG Group provides guarantees for the repayment of principal. See Note 25 “Variable interest entities and securitizations” for further discussion of the guaranteed principal money trusts.

(3)The total number

Unearned income is primarily comprised of authorized sharesloan fees received from first to fourth series class XV preferred stock shall not exceed 900,000,000.consumer loan customers when loans are made. This income is being deferred and recognized in earnings over the life of the loan.

(4)The total number of authorized shares from first to fourth series class XVI preferred stock shall not exceed 1,500,000,000.

14. Preferred stock

The composition of preferred stock at March 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019 is as follows:

   March 31, 2017   March 31, 2018   March 31, 2019 

Class of stock

  Authorized   Issued   Authorized   Issued   Authorized   Issued 
   (number of shares) 

Class XI preferred stock

   914,752,000    —      —      —      —      —   

Class XIV preferred stock

   900,000,000    —      900,000,000    —      900,000,000    —   

Class XV preferred stock

   900,000,000    —      900,000,000    —      900,000,000    —   

Class XVI preferred stock

   1,500,000,000    —      1,500,000,000    —      1,500,000,000    —   

Holders or registered pledgees of preferred stock are entitled to receive annual dividends, and distribution of residual assets of MHFG as set out above at the liquidation value per share, prior to holders of common stock but pari passu among themselves. MHFG may pay up toone-half of the annual dividend payable on each class of preferred stock as an interim dividend. Dividends on preferred stock are not cumulative. Holders of preferred stock are not entitled to vote at a general meeting of shareholders except where the articles of incorporation entitle holders of preferred stock to vote.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

In June 2013, MHFG newly authorized class XIV preferred stock, class XV preferred stock and class XVI preferred stock to meet the requirements of Basel III. Under Basel III, in order for preferred stock issued by a bank holding company to be included as its regulatory capital under the capital adequacy requirements, the terms and conditions of the preferred stock are required to include a provision that in the event the bank holding company is considered to benon-viable, (1) awrite-off of the relevant preferred stock or (2) a conversion of the relevant preferred stock into common stock shall be effected (loss-absorption clause). In respect of class XI preferred stock, which was authorized before the implementation of Basel III in the articles of incorporation of MHFG, it is not possible to include the foregoing loss-absorption clause in the terms and conditions of that preferred stock under the current provisions of the articles of incorporation. Therefore, class XIV preferred stock, class XV preferred stock and class XVI preferred stock were newly authorized so that the foregoing loss-absorption clause can be included in the terms and conditions of class XIV preferred stock, class XV preferred stock and class XVI preferred stock by a resolution of the board of directors relating to the issuance of the relevant preferred stock. Besides the foregoing loss-absorption clause, provisions regarding the preferred stock dividends, distribution of residual assets, acquisition clause and rights to request acquisition in respect of class XIV preferred stock, class XV preferred stock and class XVI preferred stock were newly established. In addition, each of class XIV preferred stock, class XV preferred stock and class XVI preferred stock was established in multiple series as a separate class of shares in order to enable MHFG to issue that preferred stock in multiple series.

The following table shows the changes in the number of shares and the aggregate amount of preferred stock during the fiscal yearsyear ended March 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017:

 

Class of stock

 Issued at
March 31,
2014
  Net
change
  Issued at
March 31,
2015
  Net
change
  Issued at
March 31,
2016
  Net
change
  Issued at
March 31,
2017
 
  (number of shares) 

Eleventh series class XI preferred stock(Note)

  914,752,000   —     914,752,000   —     914,752,000   (914,752,000  —   
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  914,752,000   —     914,752,000   —     914,752,000   (914,752,000  —   
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Class of stock

 Aggregate
amount at
March 31,
2014
  Net
change
  Aggregate
amount at
March 31,
2015
  Net
change
  Aggregate
amount at
March 31,
2016
  Net
change
  Aggregate
amount at
March 31,
2017
 
  (in millions of yen) 

Eleventh series class XI preferred stock(Note)

  914,752   —     914,752   —     914,752   (914,752  —   
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  914,752   —     914,752   —     914,752   (914,752  —   
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   2017 
   (shares)  (in millions of yen) 

Balance at beginning of fiscal year

   914,752,000   914,752 

Net change (Note)

   (914,752,000  (914,752
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at end of fiscal year

   —     —   
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

Note:

In July 2016, all shares of the eleventh series class XI preferred stock were converted into common stock and cancelled.

There was no change in balance of the preferred stock in the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018 and 2019.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

15. Common stock

The following table shows the changes in the number of issued shares of common stock during the fiscal years ended March 31, 2015, 20162017, 2018 and 2017:2019:

 

  2015   2016   2017   2017   2018   2019 
  (shares)   

 

(shares)

 

Balance at beginning of fiscal year

   24,263,885,187    24,621,897,967    25,030,525,657    25,030,525,657    25,386,307,945    25,389,644,945 

Issuance of new shares of common stock due to conversion of Eleventh series class XI preferred stock

   351,822,780    403,667,690    349,677,288 

Issuance of new shares of common stock due to conversion of class XI preferred stock

   349,677,288    —      —   

Issuance of new shares of common stock due to exercise of stock acquisition rights

   6,190,000    4,960,000    6,105,000    6,105,000    3,337,000    2,854,000 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Balance at end of fiscal year

   24,621,897,967    25,030,525,657    25,386,307,945    25,386,307,945    25,389,644,945    25,392,498,945 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

16. Dividends

The amount available for dividends under theJapan’s Companies Act is based on the amount recorded in MHFG’snon-consolidated general books of account, maintained in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in Japan (“Japanese GAAP”) and adjusted by postperiod-end changes. Therefore, the consolidated shareholders’ equity under U.S. GAAP has no effect on the determination of the amount available for dividends. On March 31, 2017,2019, MHFG’s capital stock, capital surplus and retained earnings were ¥2,256,275¥2,256,768 million, ¥1,196,259¥1,196,673 million and ¥1,839,725¥2,070,749 million, respectively, under Japanese GAAP.

InPursuant to the Companies Act, in making a distribution of retained earnings, an entity must set aside in its legal reserve an amount equal toone-tenth of the amount of retained earnings so distributed, until its legal reserve reachesone-quarter of its capital stock. MHFG’s legal reserve at March 31, 20172019 was ¥1,200,517¥1,201,010 million, of which ¥1,196,167¥1,196,660 million was included in capital surplus and ¥4,350 million in retained earnings.

In addition to the provision that requires an appropriation for the legal reserve, the Companies Act and theJapan’s Banking Act impose certain limitations on the amount available for dividends. Under the Companies Act, MHFG’s maximum amount available for dividends, at March 31, 2017,2019, was ¥1,831,321¥2,060,236 million, based on the amount recorded in MHFG’s general books of account under Japanese GAAP. Under the Banking Act and related regulations, MHFG has to meet the minimum capital adequacy requirements. Distributions of retained earnings, which are otherwise distributable to shareholders, are restricted in order to maintain the minimum Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 4.5% for capital adequacy purposes under the rules in Basel III. See Note 18 “Regulatory matters” for further discussion of regulatory capital requirements.

Payment of dividends on shares of common stock is also subject to the prior payment of dividends on shares of preferred stock.stock, if any are outstanding.

The following table shows dividends on preferred stock and common stock during the fiscal years ended March 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017:

2015

  Cash dividends 

Class of stock

  Per share   In aggregate 
   (in yen)   (in millions of yen) 

Eleventh series class XI preferred stock

   20    5,906 

Common stock

   7    170,231 
    

 

 

 

Total

     176,137 
    

 

 

 

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

2016

  Cash dividends 

Class of stock

  Per share   In aggregate 
   (in yen)   (in millions of yen) 

Eleventh series class XI preferred stock

   20    3,572 

Common stock

   7.75    191,693 
    

 

 

 

Total

     195,265 
    

 

 

 

2017

  Cash dividends 

Class of stock

  Per share   In aggregate 
   (in yen)   (in millions of yen) 

Eleventh series class XI preferred stock(Note)

   10    989 

Common stock

   7.50    189,013 
    

 

 

 

Total

     190,002 
    

 

 

 

Note:In July 2016, all shares of the eleventh series class XI preferred stock were converted into common stock and cancelled. Consequently, the amount for the fiscal year does not include interim dividends.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

17. Accumulated other comprehensive income

Changes in each component of AOCI for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2015, 20162017, 2018 and 20172019 are as follows:

 

  2015 2016 2017   2017 2018 2019 
  (in millions of yen)   (in millions of yen) 

AOCI, balance at beginning of fiscal year, previously reported

   1,117,877  2,041,005  1,469,308    1,469,308  1,521,163  1,741,894 

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles (Notes 2 and 25)

   —     —    330 

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles

   330   —    (1,535,142) (1) 

AOCI, balance at beginning of fiscal year, adjusted

   1,117,877  2,041,005  1,469,638    1,469,638  1,521,163  206,752 

Net unrealized gains (losses) onavailable-for-sale securities:

        

Balance at beginning of fiscal year, previously reported

   1,123,272  1,747,607  1,409,459    1,409,459  1,461,302  1,556,585 

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles
(Notes 2 and 25)

   —     —    (85

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles

   (85  —    (1,525,064) (1) 

Balance at beginning of fiscal year, adjusted

   1,123,272  1,747,607  1,409,374    1,409,374  1,461,302  31,521 

Unrealized holding gains (losses) during year

   763,115  (189,479 273,844    273,844  282,141  (11,358

Less: reclassification adjustments for losses (gains) included in net income

   (138,780 (148,669 (221,916   (221,916 (186,858 1,856 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Change during year

   624,335  (338,148 51,928    51,928  95,283  (9,502
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at end of fiscal year

   1,747,607  1,409,459  1,461,302    1,461,302  1,556,585  22,019 

Foreign currency translation adjustments:

        

Balance at beginning of fiscal year, previously reported

   (6,434 129,179  6,310    6,310  (5,535 (35,076

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles
(Notes 2 and 25)

   —     —    415 

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles

   415   —     —   

Balance at beginning of fiscal year, adjusted

   (6,434 129,179  6,725    6,725  (5,535 (35,076

Foreign currency translation adjustments during year

   134,104  (122,081 (11,920   (11,920 (26,936 (22,737

Less: reclassification adjustments for losses (gains) included in net income

   1,509  (788 (340   (340 (2,605 (745
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Change during year

   135,613  (122,869 (12,260   (12,260 (29,541 (23,482
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at end of fiscal year

   129,179  6,310  (5,535   (5,535 (35,076 (58,558

Pension liability adjustments:

        

Balance at beginning of fiscal year

   53,539  65,396  220,385 

Unrealized gains (losses) during year

   11,561  157,737  (17,243

Less: reclassification adjustments for losses (gains) included in net income

   296  (2,748 (6,696
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Change during year

   11,857  154,989  (23,939
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at end of fiscal year

   65,396  220,385  196,446 

Own credit risk adjustments (2):

    

Balance at beginning of fiscal year, previously reported

   1,039  164,219  53,539    —     —     —   

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles

   —     —     (10,078) (1) 

Balance at beginning of fiscal year, adjusted

   —     —    (10,078

Unrealized gains (losses) during year

   163,191  (107,497 11,561    —     —    14,293 

Less: reclassification adjustments for losses (gains) included in net income

   (11 (3,183 296    —     —    (101
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Change during year

   163,180  (110,680 11,857    —     —    14,192 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at end of fiscal year

   164,219  53,539  65,396    —     —    4,114 

Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax attributable to MHFG shareholders

   923,128  (571,697 51,525    51,525  220,731  (42,731
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

AOCI, balance at end of fiscal year

   2,041,005  1,469,308  1,521,163    1,521,163  1,741,894  164,021 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Notes:

(1)

See Note 2 “Recently issued accounting pronouncements” for further details of the cumulative-effect adjustment for AOCI.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

(2)

The MHFG Group adopted ASUNo.2016-01 on April 1, 2018. The ASU requires an entity to present separately in other comprehensive income the portion of the total change in the fair value of a liability resulting from a change in the instrument-specific credit risk when the entity has elected to measure the liability at fair value in accordance with the fair value option for financial instruments. See Note 2 “Recently issued accounting pronouncements” for further details.

The following table shows the amounts reclassified out of AOCI into net income during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017:2019:

 

 Before
tax (1)
 Tax
effect (2)
 Net of tax
before
allocation to
noncontrolling
interests
 Net of tax
attributable to
noncontrolling
interests (2)
 Net of tax
attributable
to MHFG

shareholders
  Before
tax (1)
 Tax
effect (2)
 Net of tax
before
allocation to
noncontrolling
interests
 Net of tax
attributable to
noncontrolling
interests (2)
 Net of tax
attributable
to MHFG

shareholders
 
 (in millions of yen)  (in millions of yen) 

Amounts reclassified out of AOCI into net income:

      

Affected line items in the consolidated statements of income:

      

Affected line items in the consolidated statements of income:

Net unrealized gains (losses) onavailable-for-sale securities

 319,707  (97,729 221,978  (62 221,916  

Investment gains (losses)—net

 (2,735 889  (1,846 (10 (1,856 

Investment gains (losses)—net

Foreign currency translation adjustments

 340   —    340   —    340  

Foreign exchange gains(losses)-net

 745   —    745   —    745  

Investment gains (losses)—net

Pension liability adjustments

 (476 178  (298 2  (296 

Salaries and employee benefits

 9,068  (2,370 6,698  (2 6,696  

Salaries and employee benefits

Own credit risk adjustments

 152  (47 105  (4 101  

Other noninterest income (expenses)

 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

Total

 319,571  (97,551 222,020  (60 221,960   7,230  (1,528 5,702  (16 5,686  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Notes:

(1)

The financial statement line item in which the amounts in the Before tax column are recorded in each account presented under the heading “Affected line itemsreported in the consolidatedConsolidated statements of income”.income is listed to the right of the table.

(2)

The financial statement line items in which the amounts in the Tax effect column and the Net of tax attributable to noncontrolling interests columninterest columns are recordedreported in the consolidated statements of income are Income tax expense and Net income, (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests in the consolidated statements of income, respectively.

18. Regulatory matters

Regulatory capital requirements

MHFG, MHBK, and MHTB are subject to regulatory capital requirements administered by the Financial Services Agency in accordance with the provisions of the Banking Act and related regulations. Certain foreign banking subsidiaries are subject to regulation and control by local supervisory authorities, including central banks. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements may initiate certain mandatory actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the MHFG Group’s consolidated financial condition and results of operations.

The capital adequacy guidelines applicable to Japanese banks and bank holding companies with international operations supervised by the Financial Services Agency closely follow the risk-adjusted approach proposed by

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (“BCBS”)Bank for International Settlements and are intended to further strengthen the soundness and stability of Japanese banks.

In December 2010, BCBSBasel Committee on Banking Supervision (“BCBS”) issued the Basel III rules text, (later revised in June 2011, January 2013which builds on the International Convergence of Capital Measurement and October 2014)Capital Standards document (“Basel II”), whichto strengthen the regulation, supervision and risk management of the banking sector. Basel III text presents the details of global regulatory standards on bank capital adequacy and liquidity agreed by the Governors and Heads of Supervision, which is the oversight body of BCBS, and endorsed by the G20 Leaders at the Seoul summit in November 2010.liquidity. The rules text sets out higher and better-quality capital, better risk coverage, the introduction of a leverage ratio as a backstop to the risk-based requirement, and the introduction of the capital conservation buffer and countercyclical capital buffer as measures to promote the build-up of capital that can be drawn down in periods of stress, and the introduction of

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

two global liquidity standards.

The Financial Services Agency’s revisions to its capital adequacy guidelines became effective from March 31, 2013, which generally reflect the rules in the Basel III rules text that have been applied from January 1, 2013. The framework of Basel III is based on the following

There are three pillars: minimum capital requirements; supervisory review; and market discipline. Under the first pillar, the capital ratio is calculated by dividingprimary regulatory capital orratios used to assess capital adequacy: Common Equity Tier 1, Tier 1 and Total risk-based capital by risk-weighted assets. Under the second pillar, banksratios. The ratios are required to maintain adequate capital to support allcomprised of the major risks in their business and are encouraged to develop and use better risk management techniques in monitoring and managing such risks. Under the third pillar, banks are required to enhance disclosure, including disclosure of details of the capital adequacy ratio, the amount of each type of risk and the method of calculation used so that the market may make more effective evaluations.

With regard to risk-based capital, the guidelines based on Basel III set out higher and better-quality capital standards compared to those under Basel II, which had been effective until Basel III was applied. The guidelines based on Basel III require a target minimum standard capital adequacy ratio of 8%, Tier 1 capital ratio of 6% and Common Equity Tier 1 capital, Tier 1 capital (Common Equity Tier 1 capital and Additional Tier 1 capital) and total risk-based capital (Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital) divided by risk-weighted assets. Common Equity Tier 1 capital primarily consists of common stock, capital surplus, retained earnings and AOCI. Regulatory adjustments including certain intangible fixed assets, such as goodwill, and defined-benefit pension fund assets will be deducted from Common Equity Tier 1. Additional Tier 1 capital generally consists of Basel III compliant preferred securities and other capital that meets Tier 1 requirements under Basel II standards, net of regulatory adjustments. Tier 2 capital generally consists of Basel III compliant deferred obligations, such as subordinated debts, capital that meets Tier 2 requirements under Basel II standards, certain allowances for credit losses and noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries’ Tier 2 instruments.

Under the revised guidelines, the minimum capital adequacy ratio of 4.5%,is 8% on both a consolidated andnon-consolidated basis for banks with international operations, such as MHBK and MHTB, or on a consolidated basis for bank holding companies with international operations, such as MHFG.

Risk-based Within the minimum capital calculated from financial statements prepared under Japanese GAAP, is classified intoadequacy ratio, the following two tiers: Tier 1 capital; and Tier 2 capital. Tier 1 capital consists of Common Equity Tier 1 capital requirement is 4.5% and Additional Tier 1 capital. Common Equitythe Tier 1 capital generally consists of common stock, capital surplus, retained earnings, accumulated other comprehensive income and other disclosed reserves and others less any regulatory adjustments. Additional Tier 1 capital generally consists of instruments issued by a bank or its holding company that meet the criteria for inclusion in Additional Tier 1 capital and others less any regulatory adjustments. Tier 2 capital generally consists of instruments issued by a bank or its holding company such as subordinated debt that meet the criteria for inclusion in Tier 2 capital, general reserve for possible losses on loans (equaling the sum of (i) the excess of the amount of qualified reserves over the amount of expected losses and (ii) the amount of general reserves calculated based on the standardized approach) and others less any regulatory adjustments.requirement is 6.0%.

Under Basel III, capital instruments that no longer qualify as Additional Tier 1 capital or Tier 2 capital are being phased out beginning March 2013 by increments of 10% until becoming fully effective in March 2022. The MHFG Group’s existing preferred securities (the amounts thereof included within Additional Tier 1 capital as of March 31, 20172019 being ¥577.5¥303.0 billion) and existing subordinated debt issued before March 2013 that are still outstanding (the amounts thereof included within Tier 2 capital as of March 31, 20172019 being ¥842.1¥506.1 billion) are subject to thephase-out arrangements.

In November 2011, the Financial Stability Board (“FSB”) published policy measures to address the systemic and moral hazard risks associated with systemically important financial institutions. The policy measures include requirements for global systemically important banks(“G-SIBs”) to have additional loss absorption capacity tailored to the impact of their default, ranging from 1% to 2.5% of risk-weighted assets, to be met with Common Equity Tier 1 capital, which would be in addition to the 7.0% Common Equity Tier 1 capital requirement (including capital conservation buffer). The requirements began phasing in from January 2016 and will be fully implemented by January 2019. The Group was included in the list ofG-SIBs updated in November 2016 and was allocated to the category that would require 1.0% of additional loss absorbency.

In November 2015, the Financial ServiceServices Agency published the revised capital adequacy guidelines and related ordinances to introduce the capital buffer requirements under the Basel III rules text regardingfor Japanese banks and bank holding companies with international operations, which include the capital conservation buffer, the countercyclical capital buffer and the

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

additional loss absorption capacity requirementabsorbency requirements for G-SIBsglobal systemically important banks(“G-SIBs”) and domestic systemically important banks(“D-SIBs”). These guidelines becamehave become effective on March 31, 2016. The capital conservation buffer, the countercyclical capital buffer and the additional loss absorption capacity requirement forG-SIBs andD-SIBs must be met with Common Equity Tier l capital under the revised guidelines, and if such buffer and requirementrequirements are not satisfied, a capital distribution constraints plan is required to be submitted to the Financial ServiceServices Agency and carried out. The capital conservation buffer

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

is being phased in starting in March 2016 at 0.625% until becoming fully effective in March 2019 at 2.5%. In addition, subject to national discretion by the respective regulatory authorities, if the relevant national authority judges a period of excess credit growth to be leading to thebuild-up of system-wide risk, a countercyclical capital buffer ranging from 0% to 2.5% would also be imposed on banking organizations. The countercyclical capital buffer is a weighted average of the buffers deployed across all the jurisdictions to which the banking organization has credit exposures.

In December 2015, the Financial Service Agency published a capital adequacy guideline regarding the designation ofG-SIBs andD-SIBs in Japan. The Group was Further, MHFG is currently designated as both a global systemically important bank(“G-SIB”)G-SIB and domestic systemically important bank(“D-SIB”),D-SIB, and the additional loss absorption capacity requirement applicableapplied to the GroupMHFG was 1.0% on a fully effective basis.. The additional loss absorption capacity requirement was the same as that imposed by the FSB,Financial Stability Board, which is beingwas phased in starting in March 2016 at 0.25% until becomingand became fully effective in March 2019 at 1.0%.

Regulatory adjustments such as goodwillLeverage ratio

The Leverage Ratio framework is critical and other intangibles, and defined benefit pension fund assets and liabilities, are to be applied mainlycomplementary to the calculationrisk-based capital framework that will help ensure broad and adequate capture of Common Equitybothon- andoff-balance sheet sources of banks’ leverage.

Basel III’s leverage ratio is defined as the capital measure (numerator) divided by the exposure measure (denominator) and is expressed as a percentage. The capital measure for the leverage ratio is the Tier 1 capital in the form of the deductions. The regulatory adjustments began at 20%risk-based capital framework, and the exposure measure is the sum of the required deductions inon-balance sheet exposures, derivative exposures, securities financing transaction exposures andoff-balance sheet items.

In March 2019, the calculation of Common Equity Tier 1 capital in March 2014Financial Services Agency published the revised leverage ratio framework and will be increased by 20% increments per year through March 2018 when the regulatory adjustments reach 100%. During this transition period, the remainder not deducted from capital will continue to be subject to existing national treatments.minimum leverage ratio is defined as 3% on both a consolidated andnon-consolidated basis for banks with international operations, such as MHBK and MHTB, or on a consolidated basis for bank holding companies with international operations, such as MHFG.

The capital requirements and regulatory adjustments are being phased in over a transitional period as follows (italicized percentages indicate those still in transition periods):

 

  March
2016
 March
2017
 March
2018
 March
2019
 March
2020
 March
2021
 March
2022
   March
2018
 March
2019
 March
2020
 March
2021
 March
2022
 

Minimum Common Equity Tier 1 capital

   4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5   4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5

Minimum Tier 1 capital

   6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0   6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0

Minimum total capital

   8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0   8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0

Phase out of recognition of capital instruments that no longer qualify as capital

   40.0  30.0  20.0  10.0 0.0

Capital conservation buffer

   0.625  1.25  1.875 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5   1.875 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5

Phase out of recognition of capital instruments that no longer qualify as capital

   60.0  50.0  40.0  30.0  20.0  10.0 0.0

Phase-in of deductions from capital

   60.0  80.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

Additional loss absorbency requirements forG-SIBs andD-SIBs(Note)

   0.25  0.50  0.75 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0

Countercyclical capital buffer (1)

   0.01 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05

Additional loss absorbency requirements forG-SIBs andD-SIBs (2)

   0.75 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0

Minimum Leverage Ratio

   3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.5%(3) 

 

Note:Notes:

(1)

Figures assume that the countercyclical capital buffer will continue to be 0.05% after March 2019.

(2)

Figures assume that the additional loss absorbency requirements applied to the Group as aG-SIB andD-SIB continue to be 1.0% on a fully effective basis.basis in future years.

(3)

This figure includes a leverage ratio buffer required to be met at 50% of the additional loss absorbency requirements applied to the Group as a G-SIB under the finalized Basel III reforms.

If the capital adequacy ratio and leverage ratio of a financial institution falls below the required level, the Financial Services Agency may, depending upon the extent of capital deterioration, take certain corrective action, including requiring the financial institution to submit an improvement plan to strengthen its capital base, reduce its total assets, restrict its business operations or other actions that could have a material effect on its financial condition and results of operations.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Capital adequacy ratios and leverage ratios of MHFG, MHBK, and MHTB as of March 31, 20162018 and 20172019 calculated in accordance with Japanese GAAP and the guidelines established by the Financial Services Agency are set forth in the following table:

 

   2016   2017 
   Amount   Ratio   Amount   Ratio 
   (in billions of yen, except percentages) 

Consolidated:

        

MHFG:

        

Common Equity Tier 1 capital:

        

Required(Note)

   3,361    5.375    3,857    6.25 

Actual

   6,566    10.50    7,002    11.34 

Tier 1 capital:

        

Required(Note)

   4,299    6.875    4,783    7.75 

Actual

   7,905    12.64    8,212    13.30 

Total risk-based capital:

        

Required(Note)

   5,550    8.875    6,017    9.75 

Actual

   9,639    15.41    10,051    16.28 

MHBK:

        

Common Equity Tier 1 capital:

        

Required

   2,555    4.50    2,541    4.50 

Actual

   6,142    10.81    6,304    11.16 

Tier 1 capital:

        

Required

   3,406    6.00    3,388    6.00 

Actual

   7,244    12.75    7,536    13.34 

Total risk-based capital:

        

Required

   4,542    8.00    4,517    8.00 

Actual

   8,780    15.46    9,149    16.20 

MHTB:

        

Common Equity Tier 1 capital:

        

Required

   109    4.50    112    4.50 

Actual

   440    18.21    466    18.73 

Tier 1 capital:

        

Required

   145    6.00    149    6.00 

Actual

   440    18.21    466    18.73 

Total risk-based capital:

        

Required

   193    8.00    199    8.00 

Actual

   472    19.52    485    19.47 

Non-consolidated:

        

MHBK:

        

Common Equity Tier 1 capital:

        

Required

   2,489    4.50    2,432    4.50 

Actual

   5,892    10.65    6,057    11.20 

Tier 1 capital:

        

Required

   3,318    6.00    3,243    6.00 

Actual

   7,004    12.66    7,316    13.53 

Total risk-based capital:

        

Required

   4,424    8.00    4,324    8.00 

Actual

   8,576    15.50    8,938    16.53 

MHTB:

        

Common Equity Tier 1 capital:

        

Required

   109    4.50    113    4.50 

Actual

   448    18.52    475    18.98 

Tier 1 capital:

        

Required

   145    6.00    150    6.00 

Actual

   448    18.52    475    18.98 

Total risk-based capital:

        

Required

   194    8.00    200    8.00 

Actual

   480    19.80    493    19.70 

Note:

The required ratios disclosed above, at March 31, 2016 and 2017, include the transitional capital conservation buffer of 0.625% and 1.25%, respectively, and the transitional additional loss absorbency

   2018   2019 
   Amount   Ratio   Amount   Ratio 
   

 

(in billions of yen, except percentages)

 

Consolidated:

        

MHFG:

        

Common Equity Tier 1 capital:

        

Required (1)

   4,247    7.135    4,661    8.05 

Actual

   7,437    12.49    7,390    12.76 

Tier 1 capital:

        

Required (1)

   5,140    8.635    5,529    9.55 

Actual

   9,192    15.44    9,232    15.94 

Total risk-based capital:

        

Required (1)

   6,331    10.635    6,687    11.55 

Actual

   10,860    18.24    10,918    18.85 

Leverage Ratio:

        

Required

   /    —      /    3.00 

Actual (2)

   /    4.28    /    4.42 

MHBK:

        

Common Equity Tier 1 capital:

        

Required

   2,400    4.50    2,388    4.50 

Actual

   6,584    12.34    6,690    12.60 

Tier 1 capital:

        

Required

   3,200    6.00    3,184    6.00 

Actual

   8,330    15.61    8,527    16.06 

Total risk-based capital:

        

Required

   4,267    8.00    4,246    8.00 

Actual

   9,881    18.52    10,098    19.02 

Leverage Ratio:

        

Required

   /    —      /    3.00 

Actual (2)

   /    4.53    /    4.44 

MHTB:

        

Common Equity Tier 1 capital:

        

Required

   112    4.50    95    4.50 

Actual

   498    19.99    500    23.67 

Tier 1 capital:

        

Required

   149    6.00    127    6.00 

Actual

   499    20.05    501    23.70 

Total risk-based capital:

        

Required

   199    8.00    169    8.00 

Actual

   505    20.28    505    23.87 

Leverage Ratio:

        

Required

   /    —      /    3.00 

Actual (2)

   /    7.03    /    6.55 

Non-consolidated:

        

MHBK:

        

Common Equity Tier 1 capital:

        

Required

   2,312    4.50    2,272    4.50 

Actual

   6,330    12.32    6,363    12.60 

Tier 1 capital:

        

Required

   3,082    6.00    3,029    6.00 

Actual

   8,081    15.73    8,199    16.23 

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

   2018   2019 
   Amount   Ratio   Amount   Ratio 
   

 

(in billions of yen, except percentages)

 

Total risk-based capital:

        

Required

   4,109    8.00    4,039    8.00 

Actual

   9,619    18.72    9,757    19.32 

Leverage Ratio:

        

Required

   /    —      /    3.00 

Actual (3)

   /    —      /    4.45 

MHTB:

        

Common Equity Tier 1 capital:

        

Required

   112    4.50    94    4.50 

Actual

   504    20.28    494    23.58 

Tier 1 capital:

        

Required

   149    6.00    126    6.00 

Actual

   504    20.28    494    23.58 

Total risk-based capital:

        

Required

   199    8.00    168    8.00 

Actual

   509    20.50    498    23.75 

Leverage Ratio:

        

Required

   /    —      /    3.00 

Actual (3)

   /    —      /    6.53 

Notes:

(1)

The required ratios disclosed above, at March 31, 2018 and 2019, include the transitional capital conservation buffer of 1.875% and 2.5%, respectively, the countercyclical capital buffer of 0.01% and 0.05%, respectively, and the transitional additional loss absorbency requirements forG-SIBs andD-SIBs of 0.25%0.75% and 0.5%1.0%, respectively, which are bothall in addition to the regulatory minima. The respective required amounts are determined by applying the ratios to the sum of the risk weighted assets and certain other risk amounts.

(2)

The actual leverage ratios disclosed above, at March 31, 2018, are based on the Pillar 3 requirements.

(3)

MHBK and MHTB did not calculate the leverage ratios onnon-consolidated basis at March 31, 2018 as they are excluded from the Pillar 3 requirement.

MHFG’s securities subsidiariessubsidiary in Japan areis also subject to the capital adequacy requirement under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act. Under this requirement, securities firms must maintain a minimum capital adequacy ratio of 120% calculated as a percentage of capital accounts less certain assets, as determined in accordance withcalculated using Japanese GAAP figures, against amounts equivalent to market, counterparty, and basic risks. Specific guidelines are issued as a ministerial ordinance that details the definition of essential components of the capital ratios, including capital, disallowed assets and risks, and related measures. Failure to maintain a minimum capital ratio will trigger mandatory regulatory actions. A capital ratio of less than 140% will call for regulatory reporting and a capital ratio of less than 100% may lead to a temporary suspension of all or part of the business operations and further, to the cancellation of the license to act as a securities broker and dealer.

Management believes, as of March 31, 2017,each latest balance sheet date, that MHFG, MHBK, MHTB, and their securities subsidiariessubsidiary in Japan and foreign banking subsidiaries were in compliance with all capital adequacy requirements to which they were subject.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

19. Earnings per common share

Basic earnings per common share are computed by dividing net income attributable to MHFG common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the fiscal year. Diluted earnings per common share reflect the assumed conversion to common shares of all convertible securities such as convertible preferred stock.

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2015, 20162017, 2018 and 2017:2019:

 

   2015   2016   2017 
   (in millions of yen) 

Net income:

      

Net income attributable to MHFG shareholders

   803,048    850,492    362,440 

Less: Net income attributable to preferred shareholders

   4,910    2,430    —   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income attributable to common shareholders

   798,138    848,062    362,440 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Effect of dilutive securities:

      

Convertible preferred stock

   4,910    2,430    —   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income attributable to common shareholders after assumed conversions

        803,048         850,492         362,440 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

   2015   2016   2017 
   (thousands of shares) 

Shares:

      

Weighted average common shares outstanding

   24,368,116    24,806,161    25,285,899 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Effect of dilutive securities:

      

Convertible preferred stock(Note)

   994,745    563,044    82,993 

Stock options

   18,186    17,828    11,410 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares after assumed conversions

   25,381,047    25,387,033    25,380,302 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

  2017 2018 2019 
  

 

(in millions of yen)

 

Net income:

    

Net income attributable to MHFG common shareholders

   362,440   577,608   84,471  
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Effect of dilutive securities

   —     —     —   
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net income attributable to common shareholders after assumed conversions

   362,440  577,608  84,471 
  

 

  

 

  

 

 
  2017 2018 2019 
  

 

(thousands of shares)

 

Shares:

    

Weighted average common shares outstanding

   25,285,899  25,366,345  25,362,376 
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Effect of dilutive securities:

    

Convertible preferred stock(Note)

   82,993   —     —   

Stock options

   11,410  7,586  4,522 
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Weighted average common shares after assumed conversions

   25,380,302  25,373,931  25,366,898 
  

 

  

 

  

 

 
  2015   2016   2017   2017 2018 2019 
  (in yen)   

 

(in yen)

 

Amounts per common share:

          

Basic net income per common share

   32.75    34.19    14.33    14.33  22.77  3.33 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Diluted net income per common share

   31.64    33.50    14.28    14.28  22.76  3.33 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

Note:

The number of common shares after assumed conversion of the convertible preferred stock is based on the applicable conversion prices.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

20. Income taxes

Income tax expense

The following table presents the components of Income tax expense for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2015, 20162017, 2018 and 2017:2019:

 

  2015 2016 2017   2017 2018 2019 
  (in millions of yen)   

 

(in millions of yen)

 

Current:

                                                                    

Domestic

   184,180  162,408  130,164    130,164  130,573  116,695 

Foreign

   71,250  61,009  68,512    68,512  47,020   49,871 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total current tax expense

   255,430  223,417  198,676    198,676  177,593  166,566 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Deferred:

        

Domestic

   187,134  127,185  (99,831   (99,831 58,078  (162,475

Foreign

   (5,144 (4,060 (7,601   (7,601 1,933  5,244 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total deferred tax expense

   181,990  123,125  (107,432

Total deferred tax expense (benefit)

   (107,432 60,011  (157,231
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total income tax expense

        437,420       346,542  91,244    91,244  237,604  9,335 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

The preceding table does not reflect the tax effects of items recorded directly in Equity for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2015, 20162017, 2018 and 2017.2019. The detailed amounts recorded directly in Equity are as follows:

 

  2015 2016 2017   2017 2018 2019 
  (in millions of yen)   

 

(in millions of yen)

 

Net unrealized gains (losses) onavailable-for-sale securities:

                                                                    

Unrealized gains (losses)

   403,690  (97,339 112,467 

Less: reclassification adjustments

   (65,699 (65,207 (97,729
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

   337,991  (162,546 14,738 
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Foreign currency translation adjustments:

    

Unrealized gains (losses)

   —    126   —      112,467  123,186  (3,940

Less: reclassification adjustments

   —     —     —      (97,729 (82,828 889 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

   —    126   —      14,738  40,358  (3,051
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Pension liability adjustments:

        

Unrealized gains (losses)

   87,654  (51,661 4,785    4,785  66,331  (6,558

Less: reclassification adjustments

   (16 (1,317 178    178  190  (2,370
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

   87,638  (52,978 4,963    4,963  66,521  (8,928
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Own credit risk adjustments (Note):

    

Unrealized gains (losses)

   —     —    3,033 

Less: reclassification adjustments

   —     —    (47
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

   —     —    2,986 
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total tax effect before allocation to noncontrolling interests

        425,629  (215,398 19,701    19,701  106,879  (8,993
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Note:

The MHFG Group adopted ASUNo.2016-01 on April 1, 2018. The ASU requires an entity to present separately in other comprehensive income the portion of the total change in the fair value of a liability resulting from a change in the instrument-specific credit risk when the entity has elected to measure the

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

liability at fair value in accordance with the fair value option for financial instruments. See Note 2 “Recently issued accounting pronouncements” for further details.

Reconciliation of Income tax expense

The following table shows a reconciliation of Income tax expense at the effective statutory tax rate to the actual income tax expense for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2015, 20162017, 2018 and 2017:2019:

 

  2015   2016   2017   2017   2018   2019 
  (in millions of yen, except tax rates)   

 

(in millions of yen, except tax rates)

 

Income before income tax expense

   1,267,653    1,196,605    480,375    480,375    839,298    85,060 

Effective statutory tax rate

   35.64   33.06   30.86   30.86   30.86   30.62
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Income tax calculated at the statutory tax rate

   451,792    395,598    148,244    148,244    259,007    26,045 

Income not subject to tax

   (20,911   (12,888   (7,521   (7,521   (9,312   (8,861

Expenses not deductible for tax purposes

   1,532    1,521    1,483    1,483    1,421    1,389 

Tax rate differentials of subsidiaries

   (3,517   (2,208   (2,165   (2,165   (2,696   (3,522

Change in valuation allowance

   (4,444   (1,897   112,781 (3)    112,781 (1)    (9,102   (2,444

Change in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries

   16,084    (16,112   5,217    5,217    (1,972   (21,347) (3) 

Change in net operating loss carryforwards resulting from intercompany capital transactions

   (1,290   (1,446   647    647    —      —   

Effect of enacted change in tax rates

   (21,714(1)    (7,976)(2)    —      —      6,863 (2)    (11

Reversal of outside basis differences

   —      —      (159,119(3)    (159,119(1)    —      —   

Change in unrecognized tax benefits

   —      —      9,420 

Other

   19,888    (8,050   (8,323   (8,323   (6,605   8,666 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Income tax expense

   437,420    346,542    91,244    91,244    237,604    9,335 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

Notes:

(1)On March 31, 2015, the National Diet of Japan approved a bill affecting the statutory tax rates of MHFG and its domestic subsidiaries. As a result, the statutory tax rate in respect of MHFG’s tax returns for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 was reduced to 33.06% from the previous rate of 35.64%. In addition, the tax rate for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2017 and thereafter was reduced to 32.26%. The decrease in the MHFG Group’s balance of net deferred tax liabilities, reflecting such tax rate reductions, was recognized as a reduction to Income tax expense in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015.
(2)On March 29, 2016, the National Diet of Japan approved a bill affecting the statutory tax rates of MHFG and its domestic subsidiaries. As a result, the statutory tax rate in respect of MHFG’s tax returns for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 was reduced to 30.86% from the previous rate of 32.26%, and the statutory tax rate for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2018 will be the same rate. In addition, the tax rate for the fiscal years ending March 31, 2019 and thereafter will be 30.62%. The decrease in the Group’s balance of net deferred tax liabilities, reflecting such tax rate reductions, was recognized as a reduction to Income tax expense in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016.
(3)

These amounts for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 represent mainly the reversal of an outside basis difference related to certain foreign subsidiaries due to their organizational restructuring and the related increase in the valuation allowance.

(2)

On December 22, 2017, the President of the United States signed into law the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which includes a reduction in the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%. The decrease in the Group’s balance of net deferred tax assets, reflecting such tax rate reductions, was recognized as an increase to Income tax expense in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018. The MHFG Group has completed its analysis and accounting under Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 for the effects of the Act.

(3)

In the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019, the MHFG Group derecognized majority of deferred tax liabilities for undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries because the Group has intent and ability to reinvest those earnings indefinitely in certain foreign subsidiaries.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Deferred tax assets and liabilities

The components of net deferred tax assets (liabilities) at March 31, 20162018 and 20172019 are as follows:

 

  2016 2017   2018 2019 
  (in millions of yen)   

 

(in millions of yen)

 

Deferred tax assets:

      

Allowance for loan losses

   126,977  122,585 

Premises and equipment

   4,896  73,944 

Derivative financial instruments

   53,336  48,487 

Investments

   522,197  497,629    453,880   —   

Allowance for loan losses

   178,683  184,366 

Trading securities

   —    30,841    1,988   —   

Derivative financial instruments

   —    14,537 

Premises and equipment

   —    3,594 

Net operating loss carryforwards (1)(2)

   341,572  452,166 

Net operating loss carryforwards(Note)

   178,256  167,755 

Other

   170,414  190,083    204,005  216,568 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 
   1,212,866  1,373,216    1,023,338  629,339 

Valuation allowance (2)

   (339,922 (438,344

Valuation allowance(Note)

   (163,358 (158,581
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance

   872,944  934,872    859,980  470,758 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Deferred tax liabilities:

      

Prepaid pension cost and accrued pension liabilities

   255,239  247,694 

Investments

   —    198,495 

Available-for-sale securities

   710,497  724,160    764,497  12,426 

Prepaid pension cost and accrued pension liabilities

   174,959  195,620 

Undistributed earnings of subsidiaries

   11,944  17,161 

Derivative financial instruments

   56,877   —   

Trading securities

   23,154   —      —    9,158 

Premises and equipment

   1,033   —   

Other

   38,990  74,886    89,359  61,330 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Deferred tax liabilities

   1,017,454  1,011,827    1,109,095  529,103 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Net deferred tax assets (liabilities)

   (144,510 (76,955   (249,115 (58,345
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

 

Notes:

(1)Note:

The amount includes ¥268,544¥110,729 million and ¥271,266 million related to MHFG’s net operating loss carryforwards resulting mainly from intercompany capital transactions as of March 31, 2016 and 2017, respectively. The tax effect of the net operating loss carryforwards is offset by a full valuation allowance because MHFG experienced a significant expiration of net operating loss carryforwards of ¥1,262 billion in March 2013, which is negative evidence outweighing any positive evidence. Furthermore, MHFG is a holding company whose primary sources of future taxable income are management fees from subsidiaries that are not sufficient to realize deferred tax assets related to the net operating loss carryforwards.

(2)The amount includes ¥115,698¥107,246 million related to MHSC’s net operating loss carryforwards resulting mainly from the organizational restructuring of certain foreign subsidiaries as of March 31, 2017.2018 and 2019, respectively. The tax effect of the net operating loss carryforwards is substantially offset by ¥90,204¥86,189 million and ¥88,294 million, respectively, of valuation allowance as a result of considering all available evidence regarding sources of future taxable income including historical trends in taxable income in the preceding periods and forecasted taxable income.

Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities within the same tax jurisdiction have been netted for presentation purposes in the consolidated balance sheets.

As of March 31, 2019, the accumulated amount of undistributed earnings that will be indefinitely reinvested and the unrecognized deferred tax liabilities related to such subsidiaries are approximately ¥186 billion and ¥17 billion, respectively.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

The following table and accompanying footnotes provide a breakdown of deferred tax assets and the valuation allowance recognized in respect of net operating loss carryforwards by tax jurisdiction and by year of expiration as of March 31, 20162018 and 2017:2019:

 

  Deferred tax assets   Valuation allowance Deferred tax assets,
net of valuation allowance
   Deferred tax assets   Valuation allowance Deferred tax assets,
net of valuation allowance
 
  (in billions of yen)   

 

(in billions of yen)

 

2016

     

2018

     

Japan(1)

   270    (270  —      117    (88 29 

The United States

   16    (8 8    10    (1 9 

The United Kingdom(2)

   53    (53  —      48    (48  —   

Others

   3    (3  —      3    (2 1 
  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total

   342    (334 8    178    (139 39 
  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

2017

     
     

2019

     

Japan(3)

   388    (362 26    111    (92 19 

The United States

   15    (3 12    8    —    8 

The United Kingdom(2)

   46    (46  —      46    (46  —   

Others

   3    (3  —      3    (2 1 
  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total

   452    (414 38    168    (140 28 
  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

 

Notes:

(1)

¥265111 billion of the Japan deferred tax assets of ¥270¥117 billion is related to MHFG, which is offset by a full valuation allowance, and will expire during the fiscal year ending March 31, 2018.

(2)The United Kingdom net operating loss carryforwards may be carried forward indefinitely for the tax purposes.
(3)¥265 billion of the Japan deferred tax assets of ¥388 billion is related to MHFG, which is offset by a full valuation allowance, and will expire during the fiscal year ending March 31, 2018. In addition, ¥116 billion of the Japan deferred tax assets is related to MHSC, which is substantially offset by a valuation allowance, and will expire during the fiscal year ending March 31, 2026.

(2)

The United Kingdom net operating loss carryforwards may be carried forward indefinitely for tax purposes.

(3)

¥107 billion of the Japan deferred tax assets of ¥111 billion is related to MHSC, which is substantially offset by a valuation allowance, and will expire during the fiscal year ending March 31, 2026.

Determination of valuation allowance

In accordance with ASC 740, when the MHFG Group determines whether and to what extent a valuation allowance is needed, the Group considers all available evidence, both positive and negative, to estimate future taxable income. In this regard, the Group considers reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, projected future taxable income (exclusive of reversals of existing temporary differences) and qualifyingtax-planning strategies to be possible sources of future taxable income. The Group considers the specific pattern and timing of future reversals of existing taxable and deductible temporary differences onavailable-for-sale securities to constitute a prudent and feasibletax-planning strategy and strong positive evidence. The Group has the ability to control when itsavailable-for-sale securities with unrealized gains and losses are sold in order to accelerate or decelerate taxable or deductible amounts. The Group also has a long history of effecting such sales as necessary in order to utilize net operating loss carryforwards or otherwise realize deferred tax assets.

Positive evidence includes the Group’s results of operations for the current and preceding years on an overall consolidated basis and for most of the principal subsidiaries. In particular, the strong results of operations in recent years of MHFG’s principal banking subsidiaries in Japan represent positive evidence that can be objectively verified.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Negative evidence includes the existence of significant amounts of net operating loss carryforwards or cumulative losses recorded at certain entities, and the expiration of unused net operating loss carryforwards in recent years.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

A valuation allowance is recorded against deferred tax assets as of the balance sheet date to the extent the Group estimates it is more likely than not that sufficient future taxable income is not available to realize such deferred tax assets. As the Group does not apply a consolidated taxation system, with a few exceptions ofnon-principal certain subsidiaries, outside Japan, deferred tax assets and liabilities are calculated separately for each legal entity. Therefore, changes in the valuation allowance are primarily due to changes in deductible temporary differences, net operating loss carryforwards and the estimated availability of future taxable income sources of each entity.

In general, a valuation allowance is recognized against deferred tax assets related to entities that have accumulated significant net operating loss carryforwards. As of March 31, 2017,2019, the Group’s valuation allowance was primarily related to entities in Japan, the United States and the United Kingdom. The valuation allowance was partially recognized in Japan and in the United States, while the valuation allowance was fully recognized in the United Kingdom.

The Group determined whether cumulative losses were recognized by aggregating pretax results for the recent three years as part of the analysis of potential indicators of negative evidence. In each tax jurisdiction, certain entities recognized a cumulative loss on the basis of the most recent three years’ pretax results as of March 31, 2017.2019. As it pertains to each entity with a cumulative loss, a valuation allowance was fully recognized against the deferred tax assets if the Group determined there was no positive evidence that overcame the negative evidence. As of March 31, 2017, MHFG’s securities subsidiary in the United Kingdom recorded cumulative losses on the basis of the recent three years’ pretax results and recognized a full valuation allowance, as there was no positive evidence to overcome the negative evidence. MHFG and its principal banking subsidiaries in Japan did not record cumulative losses in the periods presented.

Change in valuation allowance

The following table presents a roll-forward of the valuation allowance for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2015, 20162017, 2018 and 2017:2019:

 

   2015  2016  2017 
   (in millions of yen) 

Balance at beginning of fiscal year

   443,847   388,551   339,922 

Changes that directly affected Income tax expense

   (4,444  (1,897  112,781 

Changes that did not affect Income tax expense:

    

Expiration of net operating loss carryforwards

   —     —     —   

Others

   (50,852  (46,732�� (14,359
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   (50,852  (46,732  (14,359
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at end of fiscal year

   388,551   339,922   438,344 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The decrease in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015 of ¥4,444 million in the valuation allowance that directly affected Income tax expense was a result of an assessment of the realizability of deferred tax assets that mainly reflected decreases in deductible temporary differences. The decrease in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015 of ¥50,852 million in others was primarily related to a decrease in the valuation allowance that is fully recognized against MHFG’s net operating loss carryforwards due to tax rate reductions.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The decrease in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 of ¥1,897 million in the valuation allowance that directly affected Income tax expense was primarily related to an increase of the realizability of deferred tax assets of MHFG’s subsidiaries. The decrease in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 of ¥46,732 million in others was primarily related to a decrease in the valuation allowance that is fully recognized against the MHFG Group’s net operating loss carryforwards due to tax rate reductions and the anticipated liquidation of one of MHFG’s subsidiaries.

   2017  2018  2019 
   

 

(in millions of yen)

 

Balance at beginning of fiscal year

   339,922   438,344   163,358 

Changes that directly affected Income tax expense

   112,781   (9,102  (2,444

Changes that did not affect Income tax expense:

    

Expiration of net operating loss carryforwards

   —     (264,234  —   

Others

   (14,359  (1,650  (2,333
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   (14,359  (265,884  (2,333
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at end of fiscal year

   438,344   163,358   158,581 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The increase in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 of ¥112,781 million in the valuation allowance that directly affected Income tax expense was a result of an assessment of realizability of deferred tax assets related to the net operating loss carryforwards, primarily related to the reversal of an outside basis difference related to certain foreign subsidiaries due to their organizational restructuring. The decrease in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 of ¥14,359 million in others was primarily related to a decrease in the valuation allowance that is fully recognized against the MHFG Group’s net operating loss carryforwards due to tax rate reductions and foreign currency rate reductions of MHFG’s foreign subsidiaries.

The decrease in the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018 and 2019 of ¥9,102 million and ¥2,444 million, respectively, in the valuation allowance that directly affected Income tax expense was primarily related to an increase of the realizability of deferred tax assets of MHFG’s subsidiaries.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Net operating loss carryforwards

At March 31, 2017,2019, the MHFG Group had net operating loss carryforwards totaling ¥1,590¥683 billion. These carryforwards are scheduled to expire as follows:

 

  Net operating loss
carryforwards
   Net operating loss
carryforwards

 

 
  (in billions of yen)   (in billions of yen) 

Fiscal year ending March 31:

    

2018

   865 

2019

   4 

2020

   —                  —   

2021

   —      —   

2022

   1    —   

2023 and thereafter(Note)

   720 

2023

   12 

2024

   3 

2025 and thereafter(Note)

   668 
  

 

   

 

 

Total

   1,590    683 
  

 

   

 

 

 

Note:

Including the net operating loss carryforwards which may be carried forward indefinitely in the United Kingdom.

Included in net operating loss carryforwards in the above table are MHFG’s net operating loss carryforwards of ¥879 billion resulting mainly from intercompany capital transactions, ¥865 billion of which are net operating loss carryforwards generated in relation to a previous intragroup reorganization. The tax loss was recorded at MHFG in accordance with Japanese tax law. The net operating loss carryforwards due to this transaction are to expire in March 31, 2018.

In addition, included in the net operating loss carryforwards in the above table are MHSC’s net operating loss carryforwards of ¥378¥350 billion resulting mainly from the reversal of an outside basis difference related to certain foreign subsidiaries due to their organizational restructuring. The tax loss was recorded at MHSC in accordance with Japanese tax law. The net operating loss carryforwards due to this restructuring are towill expire induring the fiscal year ending March 31, 2026.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Uncertainty in income tax

The following table is a roll-forward of unrecognized tax benefits for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2015, 20162017, 2018 and 2017:2019:

 

  2015 2016 2017   2017 2018 2019 
  (in millions of yen)   (in millions of yen) 

Total unrecognized tax benefits at beginning of fiscal year

   1,691  1,632  1,300    1,300  1,867  2,345 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Gross amount of increases (decreases) related to positions taken during prior years

   (37 (415 167 

Gross amount of increases related to positions taken during prior years

   167  224  9,550 

Gross amount of increases related to positions taken during the current year

   346  181  409    409  351  330 

Amount of decreases related to settlements

   (652  —     —      —     —     —   

Foreign exchange translation

   284  (98 (9   (9 (97 98 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total unrecognized tax benefits at end of fiscal year

   1,632  1,300  1,867    1,867  2,345  12,323 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits including ¥517¥675 million, ¥506¥888 million and ¥675¥2,164 million of interest and penalties was ¥1,632¥1,867 million, ¥1,300¥2,345 million and ¥1,867¥12,323 million at March 31, 2015, 20162017, 2018 and 2017,2019, respectively, which would, if recognized, affect the Group’s effective tax rate. The Group classifies interest and penalties accrued relating to unrecognized tax benefits as Income tax expense.

The MHFG Group is currently subject to ongoing tax audits in some jurisdictions. The oldest years open to tax audits in Japan, the United States and the United Kingdom are 2008,2010, 2002 and 2015, respectively. The Group does not anticipateIt is reasonably possible that increases or decreases of unrecognized tax benefits may decrease by approximately ¥9 billion within the next twelve months would have a material effect on its consolidated resultsdue to the resolution of operations or financial condition.various audits.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

21. Pension and other employee benefit plans

Severance indemnities and pension plans

MHFG and certain subsidiaries sponsor and offer their employees, other than directors and corporate auditors, contributory andnon-contributory defined benefit plans. Under these plans, employees are provided withlump-sum cash payments upon leaving the company. The amount of benefits under each plan is principally determined based on the position,positions in career, the length of service and the reason for retirement.severance. When employees meet certain conditions including the length of service, they may opt to receive annuity payments instead oflump-sum payments at retirement.payments. MHFG and certain subsidiaries also offer special termination benefits to former employees whose contributions during their careers were deemed meritorious and to those with particular circumstances.

Certain foreign offices and subsidiaries have defined contribution plans and/or defined benefit plans, of which disclosures are combined with those for domestic benefit plans, as they are not significant.

MHFG and certain subsidiaries have several defined contribution plans. The costs recognized in respect of contributions to the plans for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2015, 20162017, 2018 and 20172019 were ¥2,444¥3,141 million, ¥2,820¥2,511 million and ¥3,141¥3,217 million, respectively.

Pension plans are not fully integrated among subsidiaries of MHFG and plan assets are managed separately by each plan.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Net periodic benefit cost and funded status

The following table presents the components of net periodic cost of the severance indemnities and pension plans for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2015, 20162017, 2018 and 2017:2019:

 

  2015 2016 2017   2017 2018 2019 
  (in millions of yen)   (in millions of yen) 

Service cost-benefits earned during the fiscal year

   33,578  38,032  44,367    44,367  43,649  43,698 

Interest costs on projected benefit obligations

   13,060  10,479  5,724    5,724  7,471  6,933 

Expected return on plan assets

   (38,087 (40,603 (35,969   (35,969 (34,916 (38,518

Amortization of prior service benefits

   (195 (195 (195

Amortization of prior service cost (benefits)

   (195 214  152 

Amortization of net actuarial loss (gain)

   150  (4,108 780    780  411  (7,886

Special termination benefits

   5,504  4,456  3,857    3,857  3,960  2,929 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net periodic benefit cost

   14,010  8,061  18,564    18,564  20,789  7,308 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive income (loss)before-tax for the fiscal years ended March 31, 20162018 and 20172019 are summarized as follows:

 

  2016 2017   2018 2019 
  (in millions of yen)   (in millions of yen) 

Net actuarial gain (loss)

   (160,132 15,645    216,777  (21,300

Amortization of net actuarial loss (gain)

   (4,108 780    411  (7,886

Amortization of prior service benefits

   (195 (195

Prior service benefits (cost)

   (348 (109

Amortization of prior service cost (benefits)

   214  152 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total recognized in other comprehensive income (loss)before-tax

   (164,435 16,230    217,054  (29,143
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

As of March 31, 2017,2019, the amounts in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), which will be amortized as prior service costs and actuarial lossgain over the next fiscal year, are estimated to be ¥180¥163 million and ¥417¥5,627 million, respectively.

Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations and net periodic benefit cost are as follows:

 

  2015 2016 2017   2017 2018 2019 

Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations at fiscal year end:

        

Discount rates

   0.76 0.37 0.47   0.47 0.43 0.34

Rates of increase in future compensation levels

   2.00-4.80 1.80-4.80 1.80-4.80   1.80-4.80 1.80-4.80 1.80-4.80

Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost during the year:

        

Discount rates

   0.96 0.76 0.37   0.37 0.47 0.43

Rates of increase in future compensation levels

   2.00-4.80 2.00-4.80 1.80-4.80   1.80-4.80 1.80-4.80 1.80-4.80

Expected rates of return on plan assets

   2.17 1.95 1.73   1.73 1.58 1.60

In estimating the discount rates, the MHFG Group uses interest rates on high-quality fixed-income government and corporate bonds. The durations of suchthese bonds closely match those of the benefit obligations. Assumed discount rates are reevaluated at each measurement date. The expected rate of return for each asset category is based primarily on various aspects of the long-term prospects for the economy that include historical performance and the market environment.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

The following table sets forth the combined funded status and amounts recognized in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at March 31, 20162018 and 20172019 for the plans of MHFG and its subsidiaries:

 

  2016 2017   2018 2019 
  (in millions of yen)   (in millions of yen) 

Change in benefit obligations:

      

Benefit obligations at beginning of fiscal year

   1,392,459  1,495,208    1,545,893  1,559,356 

Service cost

   38,032  44,367    43,649  43,698 

Interest cost

   10,479  5,724    7,471  6,933 

Plan participants’ contributions

   1,192  1,215    1,233  1,229 

Amendments

   348  109 

Actuarial loss (gain)

   125,122  67,335    30,633  49,085 

Foreign exchange translation

   (4,054 (2,159   (32 (817

Benefits paid

   (51,392 (51,899   (53,167 (52,618

Lump-sum payments

   (16,630 (13,898   (16,672 (16,157
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Benefit obligations at end of fiscal year

   1,495,208  1,545,893    1,559,356  1,590,818 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Change in plan assets:

      

Fair value of plan assets at beginning of fiscal year

 �� 2,081,600  2,082,996    2,200,812  2,405,730 

Actual return (negative return) on plan assets

   5,058  118,714    280,251  66,652 

Foreign exchange translation

   (3,312 (3,273   (113 (390

Partial withdrawal of assets from employee retirement benefits trusts(Note)

   (66,565 (27,534

Employer contributions

   49,850  53,059    43,279  20,487 

Plan participants’ contributions

   1,192  1,215    1,233  1,229 

Benefits paid

   (51,392 (51,899   (53,167 (52,618
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Fair value of plan assets at end of fiscal year

   2,082,996  2,200,812    2,405,730  2,413,556 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Funded status

   587,788  654,919    846,374  822,738 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets consist of:

      

Prepaid pension cost

   612,102  682,592    874,191  850,472 

Accrued pension liability

   (24,314 (27,673   (27,817 (27,734
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Net amount recognized

   587,788  654,919    846,374  822,738 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Amounts recognized in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)before-tax consist of:

      

Prior service benefits (cost)

   (1,025 (1,220   (1,352 (1,309

Net actuarial gain (loss)

   57,619  74,044    291,230  262,044 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Net amount recognized

   56,594  72,824    289,878  260,735 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

 

Note:The aggregated accumulated

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018 and 2019, a subsidiary of MHFG partially withdrew assets from employee retirement benefit obligationstrusts, which were established for the payment of these plans were ¥1,493,393 millionemployees’ severance pay and ¥1,544,039 million,retirement pensions. Overall, the trusts remain in overfunded status as of March 31, 20162018 and 2017, respectively. The defined benefit plans generally employ2019. No gains or losses have been recognized as a multi-variable andnon-linear formula based upon rank and yearsresult of service. Employees with service in excess of one year are qualified to receivelump-sum severance indemnities.this transaction.

In the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, the Group incorporated employee-level anticipated future mortality improvement actuarial indicators in its pension benefit calculation, which resulted in an increase of theThe aggregated accumulated benefit obligations of ¥79,861 million.these plans were ¥1,559,356 million and ¥1,590,818 million, as of March 31, 2018 and 2019, respectively. The defined benefit plans generally employ a multi-variable andnon-linear formula based upon rank and years of service. Employees with service in excess of one year are qualified to receivelump-sum severance indemnities.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

The following table shows the projected benefit obligations and the fair value of plan assets for the plans of MHFG and its subsidiaries with projected benefit obligations in excess of plan assets, and the accumulated benefit obligations and the fair value of plan assets for the plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets at March 31, 20162018 and 2017:2019:

 

  2016   2017   2018 2019 
  (in millions of yen)   (in millions of yen) 

Plans with projected benefit obligations in excess of plan assets:

       

Projected benefit obligations

   50,554    57,980         59,319         61,579  

Fair value of plan assets

   26,240    30,306    31,503  33,845 

Plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets:

       

Accumulated benefit obligations

   48,738    56,125    59,319  61,579 

Fair value of plan assets

   26,240    30,306    31,503  33,845 

 

Note:

The plans with projected benefit obligations in excess of plan assets include those with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets.

Investment policies and asset allocation

In managing plan assets, the MHFG Group determines the appropriate levels of risk that the Group can assume under the given circumstances to maximize the investment returns from a long-term perspective while ensuring that the sufficient funds will be available to plan participants and beneficiaries. Generally, the investment returns are relative to the risks involved. In considering the maximum levels of risk that the MHFG Group can assume, it primarily considers the following factors; the employers’ burden of maintaining the benefit plans based on the design of the plans and future plan contributions, the age distribution of the plan participants and beneficiaries, the financial conditions of the employers, and the employers’ ability to absorb future variability in plan premiums. The long-term asset allocation to each asset category such as Japanese equity securities, Japanese debt securities, foreign equity securities and foreign debt securities is determined based upon the optimal portfolio, which is estimated to yield the maximum return within the range of an acceptable level of risk. Additionally, the asset allocation is reviewed whenever there are large fluctuations in pension plan liabilities caused by modifications of pension plans, or there are changes in the market environment. When selecting an investment in each asset category, the MHFG Group takes into consideration credit standing of an investee, concentration of credit risk to a certain investee and liquidity of a financial instrument etc.among other things. The investments in each asset category are further diversified across funds, strategies and sectors etc.along with other things. There is no significant investment in a single investee except Japanese government bonds.

Certain subsidiaries of MHFG established employee retirement benefit trusts and transferred their assets to the trusts as plan assets. These assets are separated from the employer’s proprietary assets for the payment to the plan beneficiaries. The assets held in these trusts are primarily Japanese equity securities and have been entrusted directly to qualified trustees including trust banks.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

MHFG and certain subsidiaries’ target allocation for the plan assets, excluding those of the employee retirement benefit trusts, at March 31, 20172019 is as follows:

 

Asset category

  Asset ratio 

Japanese equity securities

   5.00

Japanese debt securities

   44.0034.00

Foreign equity securities

   25.00

Foreign debt securities

   10.0023.00

General account of life insurance companies

   14.0011.00

Other

   2.00
  

 

 

 

Total

   100.00
  

 

 

 

 

Note:

General account of life insurance companies is a contract with life insurance companies which guarantees payments of principal and predetermined interest rates.payments.

Fair value of plan assets

The following table presents the fair value of plan assets of MHFG and its subsidiaries at March 31, 20162018 and 2017,2019, by asset class. For the detailed information on fair value measurements, including descriptions of Level 1, 2 and 3 of the fair value hierarchy and the valuation methodologies, see Note 28 “Fair value”.

 

  2016   2017   2018   2019 
  Level 1 Level 2 Level 3   Total   Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Total   Level 1 Level 2   Level 3   Total   Level 1 Level 2   Level 3   Total 
  (in billions of yen)   

 

(in billions of yen)

 

Japanese equity securities:

                                                                                                        

Common stocks(1)

   1,114  1   —      1,115    1,162    —      —      1,162    1,330   —      —      1,330    1,317   —      —      1,317 

Pooled funds(2)

   10  1   —      11    10    —      —      10    10  9    —      19    11  4    —      15 

Japanese debt securities:

                            

Government bonds

   262   —     —      262    254    —      —      254    184   —      —      184    190   —      —      190 

Pooled funds(2)

   —    1   —      1    —      2    —      2    —    4    —      4    —    10    —      10 

Other

   —    32   —      32    —      25    —      25    —    25    —      25    —    24    —      24 

Foreign equity securities:

                            

Common stocks

   98   —     —      98    111    —      —      111    108   —      —      108    120   —      —      120 

Pooled funds(2)

   —    2   —      2    —      2    —      2    —    5    —      5    —    5    —      5 

Foreign debt securities:

                            

Government bonds

   72  2   —      74    68    3    —      71    175  6    —      181    178  6    —      184 

Pooled funds(2)

   —    8   —      8    —      7    —      7    —    9    —      9    —    10    —      10 

Other

   —    16   —      16    —      16    —      16    —    16    —      16    —    18    —      18 

General account of life insurance companies(3)

   —    121   —      121    —      124    —      124    —    110    —      110    —    111    —      111 

Hedge funds

   —     —     —      —      —      —      —      —   

Other

   44(4)   (4) (5)   —      40    78    1    —      79    92(4)   —      —      92    79(4)  4    —      83 

Plan assets measured at net asset value (6)

       303          338 

Plan assets measured at net asset
value(5)

        323         327 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total assets at fair value

     1,600    180   —        2,083    1,683    180    —      2,201    1,899  184    —      2,406    1,895  192    —      2,414 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

Notes:

(1)

This class represents equity securities held in the employee retirement benefit trusts of ¥1,115¥1,330 billion and ¥1,162¥1,317 billion carried at fair value at March 31, 20162018 and 2017,2019, respectively, which are well-diversified across industries.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

(2)

These classes primarily include pension investment fund trusts. Investments in these classes are generally measured at fair value and can be redeemed within a short-term period upon request.

(3)

Investments in this class are measured at conversion value, which is equivalent to fair value.

(4)

Amounts primarily include cash and short-term assets carried at fair value.

(5)Amounts primarily include foreign exchange contracts carried at fair value.
(6)

In accordance with ASC 820, certain plan assets that are measured at fair value using the net asset value per share (or its equivalent) practical expedient have not been classified in the fair value hierarchy.

Amounts of actualThere were no returns on and purchases and sales of Level 3 assets during the fiscal years ended March 31, 20162018 and 2017 were not significant.2019.

Contributions

The total contribution of approximately ¥51¥52 billion is expected to be paid to the pension plans during the fiscal year ending March 31, 2018,2020, based on the current funded status and expected asset return assumptions.

Estimated future benefit payments

The following table presents forecasted benefit payments including the effect of expected future service for the fiscal years indicated:

 

  (in millions of yen)   (in millions of yen) 

Fiscal year ending March 31:

    

2018

   66,140 

2019

   67,758 

2020

   69,578    68,890 

2021

   70,808    70,015 

2022

   71,549    70,637 

2023-2027

   354,180 

2023

   71,370 

2024

   72,606 

2025-2029

   351,719 

22. Stock-based compensation

Stock options

MHFG, MHBK, MHTB and MHSC have stock options, in the form of stock acquisition rights, for directors (excluding the outside directors) and executive officers of the respective companies (hereinafter referred to collectively as the “Directors”).

In this plan (“MHFG Stock Plan”), 1,000 shares of MHFG common stock shall be issued or transferred upon exercise of each of the stock acquisition rights. The amount to be paid upon exercise shall beprice is 1 yen per share. The contractual term of the stock acquisition rights is 20 years. A holder may exercise the stock acquisition rights only after the date on which such holder loses the status as a Director of MHFG, MHBK, MHTB or MHSC.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

The following is a roll-forward of MHFG Stock Plan for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017:2019:

 

  Number of
shares
   Weighted-average
exercise price
   Weighted-average
remaining
contractual term
   Aggregate
intrinsic value
   Number of
shares
   Weighted-average
exercise price
   Weighted-average
remaining
contractual term
   Aggregate
intrinsic value
 
      (in yen)   (in years)   (in millions of yen)       (in yen)   (in years)   (in millions of yen) 

Outstanding at beginning of fiscal year

   17,190,000            1        7,216,000    1     

Exercised during fiscal year

   6,371,000    1        2,971,000    1     
  

 

         

 

       

Outstanding at end of fiscal year

   10,819,000    1    16.49    2,196    4,245,000    1    14.81    723 
  

 

         

 

       

Exercisable at end of fiscal year

   —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —   
  

 

         

 

       

There were nonon-vested stock options remaining as of March 31, 2017.

The following table presents the assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of the stock acquisition rights granted during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015. The risk-free interest rate is based on the Japanese government bonds yield curve for the expected remaining term in effect at the date of grant. The expected volatility is based on the historical trading data of MHFG common stock. The expected remaining term is based on the average service period of Directors of MHFG, MHBK, MHTB and MHSC, which represents the period of time that stock acquisition rights granted are expected to be outstanding. The expected dividend yield is based on the dividend rate of MHFG common stock at the date of grant.

2015

Risk-free interest rate

0.01

Expected volatility

25.91

Expected remaining term (in years)

2.46

Expected dividend yield

3.42

The weighted-average grant-date fair value of stock acquisition rights granted during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015 was ¥186,990.

The compensation cost related to this plan recognized in income was ¥1,795 million during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015.2019.

In May 2015, MHFG announced discontinuance ofdiscontinued the current stock option program along with the introduction of performance payments and performance-based stock compensation for Directors.program. Thereafter, MHFG has not issued and will not issue any new stock options.

Performance-based stockStock compensation programs

MHFG, MHBK, MHTB and MHSC introduced a newposition-based stock compensation program for Directors (“Stock Compensation I”) in July 2018 and a performance-based stock compensation program for Directors on(“Stock Compensation II”) in May 2015 using a trust.2015. The program utilizes the Board Benefit Trust framework. The performance-based stock compensation is paid in the form of shares of common stock of MHFG, acquired from the stock market through a trust, with the aim of aligning the officers’Directors’ interests with those of the shareholders and increasing the incentive to enhance corporate value. Stock Compensation I, in principle, is paid at the time of retirement of the individual Directors in the form of common stock of MHFG and cash, calculated based on their position. Stock Compensation II is calculated and then paid to the Directors based on MHFG Group’s immediate, prior period-performance, the recent performance of organizations that the Directors are in charge of, and the performance of each Director. The payment thereof is a reflectionin the form of each officer’s performance. The entire amountcommon stock of the payment in respect of the performance-based stock compensationMHFG and cash is deferred over three yearsa three-year, graded-vesting period. The amount of Stock Compensation I and the deferred portionII is subject to reduction or forfeiture depending on certain factors, including the performance of the MHFG group or the relevant Directors.forfeiture.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

The following table presents activities related to the performance-based stock compensation programs for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018 and 2019:

   Stock Compensation I   Stock Compensation II 

2018

  Number of
shares
   Weighted-average
grant-date fair
value
   Number of
shares
   Weighted-average
grant-date fair
value
 
       (per share in yen)       (per share in yen) 

Nonvested at the beginning of the year

   —      —      9,000,000    158.68 

Granted during fiscal year

   —      —      8,130,000    196.94 

Vested during fiscal year

   —      —      3,810,594    158.68 

Forfeited during fiscal year

   —      —      —      —   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Nonvested at the end of the year

   —      —      13,319,406    182.04 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   Stock Compensation I   Stock Compensation II 

2019

  Number of
shares
   Weighted-average
grant-date fair
value
   Number of
shares
   Weighted-average
grant-date fair
value
 
       (per share in yen)       (per share in yen) 

Nonvested at the beginning of the year

   —      —      13,319,406    182.04 

Granted during fiscal year

   3,770,065    189.24    6,906,635    189.24 

Vested during fiscal year

   3,770,065    189.24    5,068,949    187.48 

Forfeited during fiscal year

   —      —      —      —   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Nonvested at the end of the year

   —      —      15,157,092    183.50 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Note: Stock Compensation I was introduced in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017:2019.

   Number of shares   Weighted-average
grant-date fair value
 
       (per share in yen) 

Outstanding as of March 31, 2016

   —      —   

Granted during fiscal year

   9,000,000    158.68 

Vested during fiscal year

   —      —   

Forfeited during fiscal year

   —      —   

Outstanding as of March 31, 2017

   9,000,000    158.68 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The sharesfollowing table presents the total fair value of MHFGthe stock compensation that vested and the total amount of the common stock were acquired from the stock market by the trustee by usingfor the money entrusted tofiscal years ended March 31, 2018 and 2019:

   2018   2019 
   Stock
Compensation I
   Stock
Compensation II
   Stock
Compensation I
   Stock
Compensation II
 
   (in millions of yen) 

Fair value of vested shares

   —      782    713    930 

Common stock shares acquired

   —      1,601    713    1,307 

For both programs, the Compensation Committee. The total amount of the common stock was ¥1,428 million.

Thestock-based compensation cost with regard to the performance-based stock compensation is determined based uponon the fair value of shares of MHFGMHFG’s common stock as of grant date. For Stock Compensation I and II, the liability related to the cash-based compensation cost is remeasured at each reporting date andbased on the fair value of MHFG’s common stock. For Stock Compensation II, the stock-based compensation costs are recognized evenly over the graded-vesting period, which is three years. For Stock Compensation I, as the program is effectively vested on the grant date, the stock-based compensation cost is recognized over three year deferral period on a straight-line basis.the grant date. The following table presents the compensation cost recognized in this performance-basedthe stock compensation programprograms for the fiscal yearyears ended March 31, 2017, was ¥354 million.2018 and 2019:

As of the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017,

       2017           2018           2019     
   (in millions of yen) 

Stock Compensation I:

   —      —      713 

Stock Compensation II:

   354    868    1,287 

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

With regard to Stock Compensation II, the total compensation cost related tonon-vested awards not yet recognized is ¥1,074¥1,757 million, and this cost will be recognized over 2.3 years.1.74 years as of the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019.

23. Derivative financial instruments

The MHFG Group enters into derivative financial instruments in response to the diverse needs of customers, to control the risk related to the assets and liabilities of the MHFG Group, as part of its asset and liability management, and for proprietary trading purposes. The MHFG Group is exposed primarily to market risk associated with interest rate, commodity, foreign currency, and equity products. Market risk arises from changes in market prices or indices, interest rates and foreign exchange rates that may result in an adverse change in the market value of the financial instrument or an increase in its funding costs. Exposure to market risk is managed by imposing position limits and monitoring procedures and by initiating hedging transactions. In addition to market risk, the MHFG Group is exposed to credit risk associated with counterparty default or nonperformance in respect of transactions. CreditCounterparty credit risk arises when a counterparty fails to perform according to the terms and conditions of the contract and the value of the underlying collateral held, if applicable, is not sufficient to recover resulting losses. The exposure to counterparty credit risk is measured by the fair value of all derivatives in a gain position and its potential increaseexposure at the balance sheet dates. The exposure to counterparty credit risk is managed by entering into legally enforceable master netting agreements to mitigate the overall counterparty credit risk, requiring underlying collateral and guarantees based on an individual credit analysis of each obligor and evaluating the credit features of each instrument. In addition, credit approvals, limits and monitoring procedures are also imposed.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Notional and fair value amounts of derivative instruments

The following table summarizes the notional and fair value amounts of derivative instruments outstanding as of March 31, 20162018 and 2017.2019. The fair values of derivatives are presented on a gross basis, derivative receivables and payables are not offset. In addition, they are not offset against the amounts recognized for the right to reclaim cash collateral or the obligation to return cash collateral under master netting agreements in the consolidated balance sheets, or the table below.

 

      Fair value       Fair value 
      Derivative receivables  (2)   Derivative payables (2)       Derivative receivables (2)   Derivative payables (2) 

2016

  Notional amount (1)   Designated
as hedges
   Not designated
as hedges
   Designated
as hedges
   Not designated
as hedges
 

2018

  Notional amount (1)   Designated
as hedges
   Not designated
as hedges
   Designated
as hedges
   Not designated
as hedges
 
  (in billions of yen)   

 

(in billions of yen)

 

Interest rate contracts

   1,066,252    —     11,522    —      11,269    1,004,169    —      7,176    —      7,143 

Foreign exchange contracts

   141,517    4    3,126    1    2,979    155,832    2   2,695    —      2,382 

Equity-related contracts

   3,115    18    152    —      140    6,189    —      197    9    142 

Credit-related contracts

   4,826    —      43    —      37    2,708    —      18    —      21 

Other contracts

   327    —      59    —      55    335    —      23    —      19 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   1,216,037    22    14,902    1    14,480    1,169,233    2   10,109    9    9,707 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

      Fair value       Fair value 
      Derivative receivables (2)   Derivative payables (2)       Derivative receivables (2)   Derivative payables (2) 

2017

  Notional amount (1)   Designated
as hedges
   Not designated
as hedges
   Designated
as hedges
   Not designated
as hedges
 

2019

  Notional amount (1)   Designated
as hedges
   Not designated
as hedges
   Designated
as hedges
   Not designated
as hedges
 
  (in billions of yen)   (in billions of yen) 

Interest rate contracts

   961,518    —      8,506    —      8,473    1,052,267    —      5,786    —      5,610 

Foreign exchange contracts

   167,698    2    2,743    —      2,611    166,383    —      1,959    —      1,758 

Equity-related contracts

   4,177    —      134    5    224    5,181    —      125    —      142 

Credit-related contracts

   3,696    —      35    —      36    2,939    —      18    —      17 

Other contracts

   360    —      23    —      22    438    —      16    —      14 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   1,137,449    2    11,441    5    11,366    1,227,208       —      7,904    —      7,541 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

Notes:

(1)

Notional amount includes the sum of gross long and gross short third-party contracts.

(2)

Derivative receivables and payables are recorded in Trading account assets and Trading account liabilities, respectively.

The MHFG Group provided and/or accepted cash collateral for derivative transactions under master netting agreements. The cash collateral, which was not offset against derivative positions, was included in Other assets and Other liabilities, respectively, of which the amounts were ¥885¥981 billion and ¥716¥599 billion at March 31, 2016,2018, and ¥973¥856 billion and ¥672¥589 billion at March 31, 2017,2019, respectively.

Hedging activities

In order to qualify for hedge accounting, a derivative must be considered highly effective at reducing the risk associated with the exposure being hedged. Each derivative must be designated as a hedge, with documentation of the risk management objective and strategy, including identification of the hedging instrument, the hedged item and the risk exposure, and how effectiveness is to be assessed prospectively and retrospectively. The extent to which a hedging instrument is effective at achieving offsetting changes in fair value or cash flows must be assessed at least quarterly. Any ineffectiveness must be reported immediately in earnings. The MHFG Group’s hedging activities include fair value and net investment hedges.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Fair value hedges

The MHFG Group primarily uses forward contracts to modify exposure to changes in the fair value of Equity securities. The Group adopted ASUavailable-for-saleNo.2016-01 securities. Foron April 1, 2018. The ASU requires equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income. Therefore, after the adoption of the ASU, these forward contracts are not eligible to be hedging instruments. See Note 2 “Recently issued accounting pronouncements” for further details.

Before the adoption of the ASU, for qualifying fair value hedges, all changes in the fair value of the derivative and the corresponding hedged item relating to the risk being hedged arewere recognized in earnings in Investment gains (losses)—net. The change in fair value of the portion of the hedging instruments excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness iswas recorded in Trading account gains (losses)—net. No ineffectiveness existsexisted because the MHFG Group chooseschose to exclude changes in the differences between the spot and the forward prices from the effectiveness test. If the hedge relationship iswas terminated, the fair value adjustment to the hedged item continuescontinued to be reported as part of the basis of the item. The fair value adjustment iswas recognized in earnings upon the sale of the hedged item.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The following table summarizes gains and losses information related to fair value hedges for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017:2017, 2018:

 

  Gains (losses) recorded in income 

2015

  Derivatives Hedged
items
 Hedge
ineffectiveness
   Net gain (loss) excluded
from assessment of
effectiveness
 
  (in millions of yen) 

Equity-related contracts

   (29,666 28,005   —     (1,661)
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

 

Total

   (29,666 28,005       —      (1,661
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

 
  Gains (losses) recorded in income 

2016

  Derivatives Hedged
items
 Hedge
ineffectiveness
   Net gain (loss) excluded
from assessment of
effectiveness
 
  (in millions of yen) 

Equity-related contracts

   14,623  (18,224  —      (3,601
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

 

Total

   14,623  (18,224  —      (3,601
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

 
  Gains (losses) recorded in income   Gains (losses) recorded in income 

2017

  Derivatives Hedged
items
 Hedge
ineffectiveness
   Net gain (loss) excluded
from assessment of
effectiveness
   Derivatives Hedged
items
   Hedge
ineffectiveness
   Net gain (loss) excluded
from assessment of
effectiveness
 
  (in millions of yen)   (in millions of yen) 

Equity-related contracts

   (14,747 11,393   —      (3,354   (14,747 11,393            —      (3,354
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   (14,747 11,393   —      (3,354   (14,747 11,393    —      (3,354
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 
  Gains (losses) recorded in income 

2018

  Derivatives Hedged
items
   Hedge
ineffectiveness
   Net gain (loss) excluded
from assessment of
effectiveness
 
  (in millions of yen) 

Equity-related contracts

   (23,832 19,631    —      (4,201
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   (23,832 19,631    —      (4,201
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Net investment hedges

The MHFG Group uses forward foreign exchange contracts and foreign currency-denominated debt instruments to protect the value of net investments innon-Japanese subsidiaries from foreign currency exposure. Under net investment hedges, both derivatives and nonderivative financial instruments qualify as hedging instruments. The foreign currency-denominated debt instruments qualifying as hedging instruments include deposits and long-term debt, of which the carrying amounts of the portion designated as net investment hedges are included within the respective items in the consolidated balance sheets as well as relevant accompanying notes. For net investment hedges, the change in the fair value of a hedging derivative instrument or nonderivative hedging financial instrument is recorded in Foreign currency translation adjustments within Accumulated other comprehensive

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

income, provided that the hedging instrument is designated and is effective as a hedge of the net investment. The change in fair value of the ineffective portion is recorded in Foreign exchange gains (losses)—net in earnings. No amount is excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness of net investment hedges.

The following table summarizes gains and losses information related to net investment hedges for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2015, 20162017, 2018 and 2017:2019:

 

 Gains (losses) recorded in income and other comprehensive income (“OCI”)  Gains (losses) recorded in income and other comprehensive income (“OCI”) 
 2015 2016 2017  2017 2018 2019 
 Effective portion
recorded in OCI
 Ineffective portion
recorded in
income
 Effective portion
recorded in OCI
 Ineffective portion
recorded in
income
 Effective portion
recorded in OCI
 Ineffective portion
recorded in
income
  Effective portion
recorded in OCI
 Ineffective portion
recorded in
income
 Effective portion
recorded in OCI
 Ineffective portion
recorded in
income
 Effective portion
recorded in OCI
 Ineffective portion
recorded in
income
 
 (in millions of yen)  

 

(in millions of yen)

 

Financial instruments hedging foreign exchange risk

 (53,252 (2,678 46,697  696  16,767  47  16,767  47  (30 90  7,405  107 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 (53,252 (2,678 46,697  696  16,767  47  16,767  47  (30 90  7,405  107 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

Note:

Related to the effective portion of net investment hedges, gains of ¥41 million and ¥186 million were reclassified from Accumulated other comprehensive income to earnings for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2017 and 2019, respectively. No amount related to the effective portion of net investment

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

hedges was reclassified from Accumulated other comprehensive income to earnings for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015. Related to the effective portion of net investment hedges, gains of ¥345 million and ¥41 million were reclassified from Accumulated other comprehensive income to earnings for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2016 and 2017, respectively.2018.

Derivative instruments not designated or qualifying as hedges

The MHFG Group enters into the following derivative transactions that do not qualify for hedge accounting with a view to implementing risk management hedging strategies: (1) interest-rate swap transactions for the purpose of hedgingeconomically managing the interest-rate risks in deposits, loans etc., (2) currency swap transactions for the purpose of hedgingeconomically managing the foreign exchange risk of these assets, and (3) credit derivatives for the purpose of hedgingeconomically managing the credit risk in loans, residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”), commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”), CLOcollateralized loan obligations (“CLO”) and other similar assets. Such derivatives are accounted for as trading positions. The changes in fair value of these instruments are primarily recorded in Trading account gains (losses)—net, even though they are used to mitigate or transform the risk of exposures arising from banking activities. The net gain (loss) resulting from changes in the fair value of certain credit derivatives where the Group purchases protection to mitigate its credit risk exposure, related to its corporate loan portfolio, is recorded in Other noninterest income (expenses).

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The following table summarizes gains and losses on derivatives not designated or qualifying as hedges during the fiscal years ended March 31, 2015, 20162017, 2018 and 2017:2019:

 

  Gains (losses) recorded in income   Gains (losses) recorded in income 
      2015         2016         2017       2017 2018 2019 
  (in millions of yen)   

 

(in millions of yen)

 

Interest rate contracts

   265,324  319,225  (209,361   (209,361 (63,260 127,242 

Foreign exchange contracts

   (93,601 65,101  37,129    37,129  61,046  6,748 

Equity-related contracts(1)

   (100,326 21,571  5,131    5,131  (94,607 37,875 

Credit-related contracts(2)

   (18,007 (6,960 (6,694   (6,694 (2,830 (467

Other contracts

   368  2,015  742    742  6,330  (1,455
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

   53,758  400,952  (173,053   (173,053 (93,321 169,943 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

Notes:

(1)

The net gain (loss) excluded from the assessment of the effectiveness of fair value hedges is not included in the above table.

(2)

Amounts include the net loss of ¥2,836¥7,594 million, ¥5,230¥754 million and ¥7,594¥736 million on the credit derivatives hedgingeconomically managing the credit risk of loans during the fiscal years ended March 31, 2015, 20162017, 2018 and 2017,2019, respectively.

Credit derivatives

A credit derivative is a bilateral contract between a seller and a buyer of protection against the credit risk of a particular entity. Credit derivatives generally require that the seller of credit protection make payments to the buyer upon the occurrence of predefined credit events, which include bankruptcy, dissolution or insolvency of the referenced entity. The MHFG Group either purchases or writes protection on either a single name or a portfolio of reference credits. The Group enters into credit derivatives to help mitigate credit risk in its corporate loan portfolio and other cash positions, to take proprietary trading positions, and to facilitate client transactions.

The notional amount of credit derivatives represents the maximum potential amount of future payments the seller could be required to make. If the predefined credit event occurs, the seller will generally have a right to collect on

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

the underlying reference credit and the related cash flows, while being liable for the full notional amount of credit protection to the buyer. The Group manages credit risk associated with written protection by purchasing protection with identical or similar underlying reference credits, which substantially offsets its exposure. Thus, the notional amount is not necessarily a reliable indicator of the Group’s actual loss exposure.

The following table summarizes the notional and fair value amounts of credit derivatives at March 31, 20162018 and 2017:2019:

 

   2016  2017 
   Notional amount   Fair value  Notional amount   Fair value 
   (in billions of yen) 

Credit protection written:

       

Investment grade

   1,603    14   1,546    21 

Non-investment grade

   763    1   298    1 
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   2,366    15   1,844    22 
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Credit protection purchased

   2,592    (9  1,994    (23
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

   2018  2019 
   Notional amount   Fair value  Notional amount   Fair value 
   

 

(in billions of yen)

 

Credit protection written:

       

Investment grade

   1,105    15   1,266    12 

Non-investment grade

   197    4   199    3 
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   1,302    19   1,465    15 
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Credit protection purchased

   1,541    (22  1,628    (14
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

Note:

The rating scale is based upon either the external ratings or the internal ratings of the underlying reference credit. The lowest investment grade rating is considered to be BBB-, while anything below or unrated is considered to benon-investment grade.Non-investment grade credit derivatives primarily consist of unrated credit default swap indices such as CDX and iTraxx.

The following table shows the maximum potential amount of future payments for credit protection written by expiration period at March 31, 20162018 and 2017:2019:

 

  Maximum payout/Notional amount   Maximum payout/Notional amount 
  2016   2017   2018   2019 
  (in billions of yen)   

 

(in billions of yen)

 

One year or less

   538    507    329    326 

After one year through five years

   1,729    1,020    831    1,057 

After five years

   99    317    142    82 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   2,366    1,844    1,302    1,465 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

Note:

The maximum potential amount of future payments is the aggregate notional amount of the credit derivatives where the Group wrote the credit protection, and it has not been reduced by the effect of any amounts that the Group may possibly collect on the underlying assets and the related cash flows, nor netted against that of credit protection purchased.

Credit-related contingent features

Certain of the MHFG Group’s derivative instruments contain provisions that require the Group’s debt to maintain an investment grade credit rating from the major credit rating agencies. If the Group’s debt credit rating were to fall below investment grade, the counterparties to the derivative instruments could request immediate payment or demand immediate and ongoing full overnight collateralization on derivative instruments which are in net liability positions for the Group.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The following table shows the quantitative information about derivative instruments with credit-risk-related contingent features at March 31, 20162018 and 2017:2019:

 

  2016   2017   2018   2019 
  (in billions of yen)   

 

(in billions of yen)

 

Aggregate fair value of derivative instruments with credit-risk-related contingent features in net liability positions

   790    698    572    511 

Collateral provided to counterparties in the normal course of business

   746    658    593    489 

Amount required to be posted as collateral or settled immediately if credit-risk-related contingent features were triggered

   44    40 

Amount required to be posted as collateral or settled immediately if credit-risk-related contingent features were triggered(Note)

   —      22 

Note:

There was no amount that the Group would be required to post as collateral or settle immediately on March 31, 2018.

24. Commitments and contingencies

Obligations under guarantees

The MHFG Group provides guarantees or indemnifications to counterparties to enhance their credit standing and enable them to complete a variety of business transactions. A guarantee represents an obligation to make payments to third parties if the counterparty fails to fulfill its obligation under a borrowing arrangement or other contractual obligation.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The types of guarantees under ASC 460, “Guarantees” (“ASC 460”) provided by the MHFG Group are described below.

Performance guarantees

Performance guarantees are issued to guarantee customers’ performance under contractual arrangements such as a tender bid on a construction project or the completion of a construction project.

Guarantees on loans

Guarantees on loans include obligations to guarantee the customers’ borrowing contracts. The MHFG Group is required to make payments to the guaranteed parties in the event that customers fail to fulfill obligations under the contracts.

Guarantees on securities

Guarantees on securities include obligations to guarantee securities, such as bonds issued by customers.

Other guarantees

Other guarantees include obligations to guarantee customers’ payments, such as tax payments.

Guarantees for the repayment of trust principal

The MHFG Group provides certain trust products with guarantees for the repayment of trust principal, e.g., loan trusts and certain jointly operated designated money trusts. Pursuant to Japanese trust-related laws, trustees are prohibited from compensating beneficiaries for any loss in the beneficial interests in each trust. However, under a

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

special condition of the Japanese trust-related laws, trust banks as trustees are allowed to enter into an agreement to provide compensation for any loss in the principal of the trust. The MHFG Group manages and administers the trust assets to minimize exposures against losses from the guarantees for the repayment of trust principal, includingwriting-off impaired loans and charging it to the trust account profits. In performing its fiduciary duties, the MHFG Group also manages the trust assets separately from its own proprietary assets on behalf of customers and keeps separate records for the trust activities. The MHFG Group consolidates certain guaranteed principal money trusts. See Note 25 “Variable interest entities and securitizations” for further discussion of the guaranteed principal money trusts. The contract amounts of guarantees for repayment of unconsolidated trust principal are presented in the tables below.

Part of the trust account profits is set aside as a reserve in trust accounts to absorb losses in the trust asset portfolios in accordance with relevant Japanese laws concerning the trust business and/or trust agreements. Statutory reserves for loan trusts and reserves for jointly operated designated money trusts are calculated based on the trust principal or the balance of loans and other assets in the trust accounts. Since the probability of principal indemnification is considered to be remote, the MHFG Group had no related reserve for credit losses recorded in its consolidated financial statements.

Liabilities of trust accounts

The MHFG Group, as trustee, may enter into an agreement with a third party who is not the party to the relevant trust agreement to the extent necessary to handle the trust affairs for the purpose of fulfilling the objectives of the trust and, as such, the trustee shall be allowed to assume certain liabilities. Pursuant to Japanese trust-related

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

laws, the trustee is ultimately liable to pay those liabilities out of its proprietary assets in the event that the trust assets are insufficient to cover those liabilities. The amount of trust liabilities rarely exceeds the amount of trust assets and, therefore, those liabilities are generally covered by the corresponding trust assets. To avoid the demand for payment out of the proprietary assets, the trustee can enter into a special covenant of limited liability under which the trust creditors agree to limit the trustee’s liability to the value of the trust assets and to waive the right for compulsory execution against the trustee’s proprietary assets. The MHFG Group regularly monitors the condition of trust accounts to minimize exposures against making payment.

The amounts of such liabilities in the trust accounts, excluding those with the special covenant of limited liability, are presented in the tables below. Liabilities of trust accounts principally include obligations to return collateral under security lending transactions and other transactions.

Derivative financial instruments

Certain written options and credit default swaps are deemed guarantees pursuant to the definition of guarantees in ASC 460 if these contracts require the MHFG Group to make payments to counterparties based on changes in an underlying instrument or index that is related to an asset, a liability, or an equity security of the counterparties. The MHFG Group’s payments could involve a gross settlement or a net settlement. Because it is difficult in practice to determine whether the counterparty has the asset, the liability or the equity security relating to the underlying, the MHFG Group has decided to include all credit default swaps and written options, excluding written options outside the scope of ASC 460, in the guarantee disclosures.

Carrying amount

The MHFG Group records all guarantees and similar obligations subject to ASC 460 at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets at the inception of the guarantee. The total carrying amount of guarantees and similar obligations at March 31, 20162018 and 20172019 was ¥357¥82 billion and ¥249¥109 billion, respectively, and was included in Other liabilities and Trading account liabilities. The total includes the carrying amounts of derivatives that are deemed to be guarantees, which amounted to ¥336¥62 billion and ¥228¥90 billion at March 31, 20162018 and 2017,2019, respectively.

Maximum exposure under guarantee contracts

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The table below summarizes the remaining term and maximum potential amount of future payments by type of guarantee at March 31, 20162018 and 2017.2019. The maximum potential amount of future payments disclosed below represents the contractual amounts that could be required to be repaid in the event of the guarantees being executed, without consideration of possible recoveries under recourse provisions or from collateral held. With respect to written options included in derivative financial instruments in the table below, in theory, the MHFG Group is exposed to unlimited losses; therefore, the table shows the notional amounts of the contracts as a substitute for the maximum exposure.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The MHFG Group, when necessary, requires collateral such as cash, investment securities and real estate or third-party guarantees depending on the amount of credit risk involved, and employs means such assub-participation to reduce the credit risk associated with guarantees. The maximum exposure or notional amount below does not represent the expected losses from the execution of the guarantees.

 

2016

  Maximum
potential/Contractual
or Notional amount
   Amount by expiration period 
  One year or less   After one year
through
five years
   After five years 

2018

  Maximum
potential/Contractual
or Notional amount
   Amount by expiration period 
One year or less   After one year
through
five years
   After five years 
  (in billions of yen)   (in billions of yen) 

Performance guarantees

   2,110    1,049    909    152    2,165    1,084    908    173 

Guarantees on loans

   297    117    20    160    241    123    28    90 

Guarantees on securities

   203    67    136    —      164    32    132    —   

Other guarantees

   1,571    1,206    325    40    2,210    1,555    614    41 

Guarantees for the repayment of trust principal

   1,141    1,051    63    27    709    639    49    21 

Liabilities of trust accounts

   12,747    12,537    79    131    13,861    13,546    149    166 

Derivative financial instruments

   15,792    6,505    8,032    1,255    11,654    4,911    4,996    1,747 

2017

  Maximum
potential/Contractual
or Notional amount
   Amount by expiration period 
  One year or less   After one year
through
five years
   After five years 
  (in billions of yen) 

Performance guarantees

   2,243    1,246    828    169 

Guarantees on loans

   278    147    20    111 

Guarantees on securities

   175    37    138    —   

Other guarantees

   1,823    1,246    513    64 

Guarantees for the repayment of trust principal

   730    654    52    24 

Liabilities of trust accounts

   15,177    14,927    82    168 

Derivative financial instruments

   14,415    6,066    6,603    1,746 

2019

  Maximum
potential/Contractual
or Notional amount
   Amount by expiration period 
  One year or less   After one year
through
five years
   After five years 
   (in billions of yen) 

Performance guarantees

   2,307    1,265    878    164 

Guarantees on loans

   289    164    46    79 

Guarantees on securities

   145    91    54    —   

Other guarantees

   2,324    1,447    834    43 

Guarantees for the repayment of trust principal

   65    —      47    18 

Liabilities of trust accounts

   362    61    148    153 

Derivative financial instruments

   14,170    5,807    6,434    1,929 

The table below presents the maximum potential amount of future payments of performance guarantees, guarantees on loans, guarantees on securities and other guarantees classified based on internal ratings at March 31, 20162018 and 2017:2019:

 

      2016           2017       2018   2019 
  (in billions of yen)   

 

(in billions of yen)

 

Investment grade

   3,160    3,477    3,930    4,124 

Non-investment grade

   1,022    1,042    850    941 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   4,182    4,519      4,780      5,065 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Note:

Investment grade in the internal rating scale generally corresponds to BBB- or above in the external rating scale.

Otheroff-balance-sheet instruments

In addition to guarantees, the MHFG Group issues otheroff-balance-sheet instruments to its customers, such as lending-related commitments and commercial letters of credit. Under the terms of these arrangements, the MHFG Group is required to extend credit or make certain payments upon the customers’ requests.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Commitments to extend credit

Commitments to extend credit are legally binding agreements to lend to customers on demand. They usually have set maturity dates. These agreements differ from guarantees in that they are generally revocable or contain provisions that enable the MHFG Group to avoid payment or reduce the amount of credit extended under certain conditions, such as the deterioration of the borrower’s financial condition or other reasonable conditions. The MHFG Group monitors the financial condition of the potential borrowers throughout the commitment period to determine whether additional collateral or changes in the terms of the commitment are necessary. Since many of these commitments to extend credit expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.

Commitments to invest in securities

Commitments to invest in securities include legally binding contracts to make additional contributions to investment funds, such as private equity funds in accordance with the terms of investment agreements.

Commercial letters of credit

Commercial letters of credit are issued in connection with customers’ trade transactions. Normally, the customers cannot receive the goods until they make payment to a bank, and therefore these commercial letters of credit are collateralized by the underlying goods. Upon issuance of commercial letters of credit, the MHFG Group monitors the credit risk associated with these transactions to determine if additional collateral is required.

The table below summarizes the contractual amounts with regard to these undrawn commitments at March 31, 20162018 and 2017:2019:

 

  2016   2017   2018   2019 
  (in billions of yen)   (in billions of yen) 

Commitments to extend credit(Note)

   75,742    76,678    78,448    76,857 

Commercial letters of credit

   448    522    690    778 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   76,190    77,200    79,138    77,635 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

Note:

Commitments to extend credit include commitments to invest in securities.

Allowance for losses onoff-balance-sheet instruments

The amounts of allowance for losses onoff-balance-sheet instruments at March 31, 20162018 and 20172019 were ¥100¥90 billion and ¥120¥80 billion, respectively.respectively, and were included in Other liabilities.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Leases

The MHFG Group leases certain office space and equipment under noncancelable agreements. The lease periods for these leases range from less than 1 year to around 30 years. These leases include cancellation clauses with penalties of a maximum of approximately 5 years-worth of rentals and/or periodic adjustment clauses of rentals. The table below shows future minimum lease payments for capitalized leases and future minimum rental payments for operating leases at March 31, 2017:2019:

 

  Capitalized leases   Operating leases   Capitalized leases   Operating leases 
  (in millions of yen)   (in millions of yen) 

Fiscal year ending March 31:

        

2018

   11,519    52,280 

2019

   10,721    46,330 

2020

   8,697    41,157    9,942    51,329 

2021

   6,118    35,291    7,347    41,227 

2022

   3,188    30,562    4,454    34,707 

2023 and thereafter

   1,846    57,787 

2023

   2,661    24,633 

2024

   915    23,425 

2025 and thereafter

   222    297,183 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total minimum lease/rental payments

   42,089    263,407    25,541    472,504 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Amount representing interest

   1,142      25,020   
  

 

     

 

   

Present value of minimum lease payments

   40,947      521                 
  

 

     

 

   

Total rental expense for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2015, 20162017, 2018 and 20172019 was ¥109,390¥113,991 million, ¥118,400¥117,270 million and ¥113,991¥115,239 million, respectively.

MHFG leases its head office from a third party and accounts for the lease arrangement as an operating lease.

During prior years, the MHFG Group’s major banking subsidiaries sold their head offices (including land, buildings, facilities and equipment) to third parties. Concurrent with the sales, these subsidiaries leased the properties back for periods of 5 and 10 years for total rental payments for these periods of ¥214,690 million. The terms of certain lease agreements were changed during the fiscal years ended March 31, 2009, 2011, 2012 and 2014, and the total rental payments for these periods increased to ¥282,832 million, as a consequence. The MHFG Group accounted for the transactions as operating leases. The future minimum rental payments under the terms of the related lease agreements were ¥58,336¥41,430 million, ¥49,883¥32,977 million and ¥41,430¥24,525 million at March 31, 2015, 20162017, 2018 and 2017,2019, respectively.

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2014, MHFG began to lease its head office from a third party and accounted for the lease arrangement as operating lease.

Legal proceedings

The MHFG Group is involved in normal collection proceedings initiated by the Group and other legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business.

The Group’s Indonesian subsidiary acts as the collateral agent for the trustee of bond issuances made by subsidiaries of Asia Pulp & Paper Company Ltd. (“APP”). In that role, the subsidiary is involved in a dispute between the bondholders and such APP subsidiaries in their capacities as the issuers, guarantors and/or pledgors of security for the bonds relating to foreclosure proceedings in respect of the collateral and thecollateral. The subsidiary has been named as a defendant in a lawsuit brought by the obligors under the bonds in Indonesia. The Group’s consolidated financial statements do not include a reserve in relation to this dispute and the Group does not believe that the resolution of this matter will have a significant impact on the consolidated financial condition or results of operations of the Group, although there can be no assurance as to the foregoing.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

25. Variable interest entities and securitizations

Variable interest entities

In the normal course of business, the MHFG Group is involved with VIEs primarily through the following types of transactions: asset-backed commercial paper/loan programs, asset-backed securitizations, investments in securitization products, investment funds, trust arrangements, structured finance, and structured finance.funding vehicles. The Group consolidates certain of these VIEs, where the Group is deemed to be the primary beneficiary because it has both (1) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and (2) the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the VIE. The MHFG Group reassesses whether it is the primary beneficiary on an ongoing basis as long as the Group has any continuing involvement with the VIE. There are also other VIEs, where the Group has determined that it is not the primary beneficiary but has significant variable interests. In evaluating the significance of the variable interests, the Group comprehensively takes into consideration the extent of its involvement with each VIE, such as the seniority of its investments, the share of its holding in each tranche and the variability it expects to absorb, as well as other relevant facts and circumstances. The likelihood of loss is not necessarily relevant to the determination of significance, and therefore, “significant” does not imply that there is high likelihood of loss. The maximum exposure to loss that is discussed in this section refers to the maximum loss that the Group could possibly be required to record in its consolidated statements of income as a result of its involvement with the VIEs. This represents exposures associated with bothon-balance-sheet assets andoff-balance-sheet liabilities related to the VIEs. Further, this maximum potential loss is disclosed regardless of the probability of such losses and, therefore, it is not indicative of the ongoing exposure which is managed within the Group’s risk management framework.

The table below shows the consolidated assets of the Group’s consolidated VIEs as well as total assets and maximum exposure to loss for its significant unconsolidated VIEs, as of March 31, 20162018 and 2017:2019:

 

  Consolidated VIEs   Significant
unconsolidated VIEs
   Consolidated VIEs   Significant
unconsolidated VIEs
 

2016

  Consolidated assets   Total assets   Maximum
exposure to loss
 

2018

  Consolidated assets   Total assets   Maximum
exposure to loss
 
  (in billions of yen)   

 

(in billions of yen)

 

Asset-backed commercial paper/loan programs

   2,092    —      —      2,185    —      —   

Asset-backed securitizations

   579    205    13    627    78    5 

Investments in securitization products

   337    445    154    374    —      —   

Investment funds

   1,660    2,422    367    2,661    1,891    533 

Trust arrangements and other

   24    —      —      21    —      —   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   4,692    3,072    534    5,868    1,969    538 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

  Consolidated VIEs   Significant
unconsolidated VIEs
   Consolidated VIEs   Significant
unconsolidated VIEs
 

2017

  Consolidated assets   Total assets   Maximum
exposure to loss
 

2019

  Consolidated assets   Total assets   Maximum
exposure to loss
 
  (in billions of yen)   

 

(in billions of yen)

 

Asset-backed commercial paper/loan programs

   2,031    —      —      2,249    —      —   

Asset-backed securitizations

   629    108    11    571    70    8 

Investments in securitization products

   375    445    154    372    —      —   

Investment funds

   2,188    3,895    463    2,836    1,280    410 

Trust arrangements and other

   23    —      —      20    —      —   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   5,246    4,448    628    6,048    1,350    418 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

The Group has not provided financial or other support to consolidated or unconsolidated VIEs that the Group was not previously contractually required to provide.

The tables below present the carrying amounts and classification of assets and liabilities on the MHFG Group’s balance sheets that relate to its variable interests in significant unconsolidated VIEs, as of March 31, 20162018 and 2017:2019:

 

Assets on balance sheets related to unconsolidated VIEs:

      2016           2017       2018   2019 
  (in billions of yen)   

 

(in billions of yen)

 

Trading account assets

   55    85    89    104 

Investments

   254    254    210    168 

Loans

   205    237    163    71 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   514    576    462    343 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

Liabilities on balance sheets and maximum exposure to loss related to unconsolidated VIEs:

      2016           2017       2018   2019 
  (in billions of yen)   

 

(in billions of yen)

 

Payables under securities lending transactions

   27    31    38    47 

Trading account liabilities

   1    1    1    1 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   28    32    39    48 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Maximum exposure to loss(Note)

   534    628    538    418 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

Note:

This represents the maximum amount the Group could possibly be required to record in its consolidated statements of income associated withon-balance-sheet exposures andoff-balance-sheet liabilities such as undrawn commitments.

Asset-backed commercial paper/loan programs

The MHFG Group manages several asset-backed commercial paper/loan programs that provide its clients withoff-balance-sheet and/or cost-effective financing. The VIEs used in the programs purchase financial assets, primarily receivables, from clients participating in the programs and provide liquidity through the issuance of commercial paper or borrowings from the MHFG Group backed by the financial assets. While customers normally continue to service the transferred receivables, the MHFG Group underwrites, distributes, and makes a market in commercial paper issued by the conduits. The MHFG Group typically provides program-wide liquidity and credit support facilities and, in some instances, financing to the VIEs. The MHFG Group has the power to determine which assets will be held by the VIEs and has an obligation to monitor these assets. The Group is also responsible for liability management. In addition, through the liquidity and credit support facilities provided to the VIEs, the Group has the obligation to absorb losses that could potentially be significant to the VIEs. Therefore, the Group consolidates such VIEs.

Asset-backed securitizations

The MHFG Group acts as an arranger of various types of structured finance schemes to meet its clients’ needs foroff-balance-sheet financing. In substantially all of these structured financing transactions, the transfer of the financial asset by the client is structured to be bankruptcy remote by use of a bankruptcy remote entity, which is deemed to be a VIE because its equity holder does not have decision making rights. The MHFG Group receives fees for structuring and/or distributing the securities sold to investors. In some cases, the MHFG Group itself purchases the securities issued by the entities and/or provides loans to the VIEs.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

In addition, the MHFG Group establishes several single-issue and multi-issue special purpose entities that issue collateralized debt obligations (“CDO”) or CLO, synthetic CDO/CLO or other repackaged instruments to meet clients’ and investors’ financial needs. The MHFG Group also arranges securitization transactions including CMBS, RMBS and others. In these transactions, the MHFG Group acts as an underwriter, placement agent, asset manager, derivatives counterparty, and/or investor in debt and equity instruments.

In certain VIEs, where the MHFG Group provides liquidity and credit support facilities, writes credit protection or invests in debt or equity instruments in its role as an arranger, servicer, administrator or asset manager, etc., the Group has the power to determine which assets will be held by the VIEs or to manage and monitor these assets. In addition, through the variable interests above, the Group has the obligation to absorb losses and the right to receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the VIEs. Therefore, the Group consolidates such VIEs.

The MHFG Group established certain VIEs to securitize its own mortgage loans. The Group provides servicing for and holds retained subordinated beneficial interests in the securitized mortgage loans. In addition, the Group retains credit exposure in the form of guarantees on these loans. In its role as a servicer, the Group has the power to direct the entity’s activities that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance by managing defaulted mortgage loans. In addition, through its retained interests and its aforementioned involvement as a guarantor, the Group has the obligation to absorb losses and the right to receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the entity. Therefore, the Group consolidates such VIEs.

Investments in securitization products

The MHFG Group invests in, among other things, various types of CDO/CLO, synthetic CDO/CLO and repackaged instruments, CMBS and RMBS arranged by third parties for the purpose of generating current income or capital appreciation, which all utilize entities that are deemed to be VIEs. By design, such investments were investment grade at issuance and held by a diverse group of investors. The potential loss amounts of the securities and the loans are generally limited to the amounts invested because the Group has no contractual involvement in such VIEs beyond its investments. Since the Group is involved in these VIEs only as an investor, the Group does not ordinarily have the power to direct the VIEs’ activities that most significantly impact the VIEs’ economic performance. However, the Group consolidates VIEs, where the transactions are tailored by the third party arrangers to meet the Group’s needs as a main investor, who is ultimately deemed to have the power to determine which assets are to be held by the VIEs. The Group also invests in certain beneficial interests issued by VIEs which hold real estate that the Group utilizes. In addition to these variable interests, when the Group has the power including the sole unilateral ability to liquidate the VIEs, the Group consolidates such VIEs.

Investment funds

The MHFG Group invests in various investment funds, including securities investment trusts, which collectively invest in equity and debt securities that include listed Japanese securities and investment grade bonds. Investment advisory companies or fund management companies, including the Group’s subsidiaries and affiliates, administer and make investment decisions about such investment funds. The Group consolidates certain investment funds where it is deemed to be the primary beneficiary.

Prior to April 1, 2016, the Group determined that certain investment funds managed by the Group that had attributes of an investment company (or similar entity) qualified for the deferral from certain requirements of ASC 810 that originated from Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No.167 “Amendments to FASB Interpretation No.46(R)” (“SFAS No.167”). For these funds, the Group determined whether it was the primary beneficiary by evaluating whether it absorbed the majority of expected losses, received the majority of expected residual returns, or both.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

On April 1, 2016, the Group adopted ASUNo.2015-02 which eliminated the deferral. The Group determines whether it is the primary beneficiary by evaluating whether it has both (1) the power to make investment decisions about the investment funds and (2) the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the investment funds.

Upon the adoption of ASUNo.2015-02, the Group newly consolidated certain investment funds that had not been consolidated prior to April 1, 2016, which had the impact of increasing total assets primarily consisting of Trading account assets by ¥16 billion, and noncontrolling interests by ¥16 billion, respectively. On the other hand, the Group deconsolidated certain investment funds that had been consolidated prior to April 1, 2016, which had the impact of decreasing total assets by ¥54 billion, total liabilities by ¥27 billion, and noncontrolling interests by ¥27 billion, respectively. In addition, the Group determined that certain limited partnerships and similar entities that had been voting interest entities prior to April 1, 2016 are significant unconsolidated VIEs. The amounts relating to significant unconsolidated VIEs as of March 31, 20172018 and 2019 in the tables above include the amounts of these limited partnerships and similar entities.

Trust arrangements

The MHFG Group offers a variety of asset management and administration services under trust arrangements including security investment trusts, pension trusts and trusts used in the securitization of assets originated by and transferred to third parties. The Group receives trust fees for providing services as an agent or fiduciary on behalf of beneficiaries.

With respect to guaranteed principal money trust products, the MHFG Group assumes certain risks by providing guarantees for the repayment of principal as required by the trust agreements or relevant Japanese legislation. The MHFG Group manages entrusted funds primarily through the origination of high quality loans and other credit-related products, investing in investment grade marketable securities such as Japanese government bonds and placing cash with the MHFG Group’s subsidiary trust banks. The Group has the power to determine which assets will be held by the VIEs or to manage these assets. In addition, through the principal guarantee agreements, the Group has the obligation to absorb losses that could potentially be significant to the VIEs. Therefore, the Group consolidates such VIEs. However, the MHFG Group does not consolidate certain guaranteed principal money trusts, which invest all the entrusted funds in the MHFG Group itself, as the Group has determined that it has no variable interests (Refer to Note 11 “Due to trust accounts”).interests. See Note 24 “Commitments and contingencies” for the balances of guaranteed trust principal that are not consolidated at March 31, 20162018 and 2017.2019.

With respect tonon-guaranteed trust arrangements, the MHFG Group manages and administers assets on behalf of its customers (trust beneficiaries) in the capacity of a trustee and fiduciary. For substantially allnon-guaranteed trust arrangements, the Group generally does not have the power to direct the activities of the VIEs that most significantly impact the VIEs’ economic performance or has neither the obligation to absorb losses nor the right to receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the VIEs. Therefore, such trust accounts are not included in the consolidated financial statements of the MHFG Group.

Special purpose entities created for structured finance

The MHFG Group is involved in real estate, commercial aircraft and other vessel and machinery and equipment financing to VIEs. As the Group typically only provides senior financing with credit enhanced by subordinated interests and may sometimes act as an interest rate swap counterparty, the Group has determined that it does not have the power to direct the activities of the VIEs that most significantly impact the VIEs’ economic performance, or it does not have significant variable interests.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Funding Vehicles

The MHFG Group has established several wholly-ownedoff-shore vehicles which issue securities, typically preferred stock that is fully guaranteed by the MHFG Group, to investors unrelated to the MHFG Group to fund purchases of debt instruments issued by the MHFG Group. These entities are considered VIEs because they lack sufficient equity to finance their activities; however, the MHFG Group’s investment in the vehicles’ equity is not a variable interest because the investment is not considered to be at risk as the entire amount raised by the vehicles was used to purchase debt instruments issued by the MHFG Group. Because the MHFG Group does not have variable interests in these vehicles, the MHFG Group does not consolidate these entities. Debt instruments issued by the MHFG Group, which are included in Long-term debt, were ¥950 billion and ¥681 billion at March 31, 2018 and 2019, respectively.

Securitization

The MHFG Group engages in securitization activities and securitizes mortgage loans, other loans, government and corporate securities and other types of financial assets in the normal course of business. In these securitization transactions, the Group records the transfer of a financial asset as a sale when all the accounting criteria for a sale under ASC 860 are met. These criteria are (1) the transferred financial assets are legally isolated from the Group’s creditors, (2) the transferee or beneficial interest holder has the right to pledge or exchange the transferred financial assets, and (3) the Group does not maintain effective control over the transferred financial assets. If all the criteria are not met, the transfer is accounted for as a secured borrowing.

For the fiscal years ended March 31, 2015, 20162017, 2018 and 2017,2019, the MHFG Group neither made significant transfers of financial assets nor recognized significant gains or losses in securitization transactions accounted for as sales. The Group did not retain significant interests in securitization transactions accounted for as sales as of March 31, 20162018 and 2017.2019.

There are certain transactions where transfers of financial assets do not qualify for the aforementioned sales criteria and are accounted for as secured borrowings. These transferred assets continue to be carried on the consolidated balance sheets of the MHFG Group. Such assets are associated with securitization transactions and loan participation transactions, which amounted to ¥243¥208 billion and ¥64¥89 billion as of March 31, 2016,2018, and ¥244¥207 billion and ¥91¥143 billion as of March 31, 2017,2019, respectively. Liabilities associated with securitization and loan participation transactions are presented as Payables under securities lending transactions and Other short-term borrowings or Long-term debt, respectively, on the consolidated balance sheets.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

26. Fee and commissionNoninterest income

Details of Fee and commissionNoninterest income for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2015, 20162017, 2018 and 20172019 are as follows:

 

   2015   2016   2017 
   (in millions of yen) 

Securities-related business

   172,234    175,723    165,857 

Deposits and lending business

   131,491    143,763    164,573 

Remittance business

   110,181    109,859    108,368 

Trust fees

   49,827    50,496    47,379 

Fees for other customer services

   251,924    263,112    260,360 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   715,657    742,953    746,537 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   2017  2018   2019 
   (in millions of yen) 

Fee and commission income:

   

Securities-related business(1)

   165,857   180,122    145,270 

Deposits and lending business(2)

   164,572   156,426    152,283 

Remittance business(1)

   108,368   110,054    110,382 

Asset management business(1)

   79,426   100,765    97,852 

Trust related business(1)

   108,931   121,808    124,843 

Agency business(1)

   36,003   37,397    36,466 

Guarantee related business(3)

   26,292   28,258    28,582 

Fees for other customer services(1)

   136,514   130,881    157,612 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Fee and commission income

   825,963   865,711    853,290 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Foreign exchange gains (losses)—net(3) 

   69,453   91,793    93,577 

Trading account gains (losses)—net(2)

   (42,481  236,982    328,841 

Investment gains (losses)—net:

     

Debt securities(3)

   59,517   7,757    (3,842

Equity securities(3)

   273,753   289,400    (155,947

Equity in earnings (losses) of equity method investees—net(3)

   26,785   24,342    29,172 

Gains on disposal of premises and equipment(3)

   5,638   8,225    5,145 

Other noninterest income(2)

   149,404   80,453    72,135 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   1,368,032   1,604,663    1,222,371 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Notes:

(1)

These amounts are revenues from contracts within the scope of ASC 606, “Revenue from contracts with customers ” (“ASC 606”).

(2)

Part of these amounts are considered to be revenues from contracts that are within the scope of ASC 606.

(3)

These amounts are revenues from contracts that do not meet the scope of ASC 606.

Certain Fee and commission income, Trading account gains (losses)—net and Other noninterest income outlined in the table above are considered to be revenues from contracts that are within the scope of ASC 606. The MHFG Group disaggregates Fee and commission income, which is the main part of revenues within the scope of ASC 606, by type of business or service in the table above.

Fee and commission income

Securities-related business fees mainly consist of brokerage fees and commissions, and asset-based revenues. Brokerage fees and commissions mainly include fees earned from the execution of customer transactions and sales commissions of investment trusts. Brokerage fees and commissions are recognized at the point in time on transaction date. Asset-based revenues mainly include fees received from investment trust management companies in return for administration services, such as record keeping services, of investment trusts. The amounts of asset-based revenues are calculated based on customer’s net asset value and recognized over time in the period when the related service is provided.

Deposits and lending business fees consist of broker’sdeposit-related fees and markupslending-related fees. Most of the deposit-related fees are within the scope of ASC 606, while most of the lending-related fees such as commitment fees

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

and arrangement fees are not. Deposit-related fees within the scope of ASC 606 include service charges on securities underwritingconsumer and other securitiescommercial deposit accounts such as account transfer charges. Deposit-related fees are recognized at the point in time when the transactions occur or the related activities. service is provided.

Remittance business fees include service charges for domestic and international funds transfers and collections. These fees are recognized at the point in time when the related service is provided.

Asset management business fees consist of service chargesinvestment trust management fees and investment advisory fees for funds transfer and collections. Trustinvestment trusts. These fees are received from investment trusts in return for asset management services and/or investment advisory services on behalf of customers. The amounts of these fees are calculated based on a percentage of customer’s net asset value. These fees are recognized over time in the period when the management and/or advisory service is provided and the amount is fixed.

Trust related business fees consist of trust fees earned primarily bythrough fiduciary asset management and administrative service and other trust-related fees, which amounted to ¥51 billion and ¥74 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019, respectively. Fees for fiduciary asset management and administration services for corporate pension plans and investment funds are recognized over time in the period when the related service is provided. Other trust-related fees mainly include brokerage commissions of real estate property, sales commissions of beneficial interest in real estate trust and other. Feescharges for other customer servicesstock transfer agent services. These fees are mainly earned on a transaction basis and recognized at the point in time when the related service is provided.

Agency business fees mainly include administration service fees related to the MHFG Group’s agency business guaranteesuch as Japan’s principal public lottery program and revenues from standing proxy services. These fees are recognized at the point in time when the related business,service is provided.

Fees for other customer services include various revenues such as sales commissions of life insurance, service charges for electronic banking, financial advisory fees, and other.service charges for software development. Sales commissions from life insurance sales are received from insurance companies in return for selling insurance products and recognized when the insurance product is sold to customers. Service charges for electronic banking are mainly monthly basic usage fees and recognized over the related transaction period. Financial advisory fees are recognized over time in the period when the related advisory service based on the contract is rendered. Service charges for software development are recognized over time according to the progress of the development.

Trading account gains (losses)—net and Other noninterest income

In addition to Fee and commission relatedincome, Trading account gains (losses)—net and Other noninterest income include certain revenues within the scope of ASC 606. Underwriting fees from trading securities, which amounted to assets management business, which¥68 billion for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019, are includedwithin the scope of ASC 606 and accounted for in Trading account gains (losses)—net. Underwriting fees are recognized at the point in time when trade terms are fixed. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019, approximately ¥26 billion of Other noninterest income was within the scope of ASC 606. Credit card interchange fees are within the scope of ASC 606 and accounted for in Other noninterest income. Credit card interchange fees are earned on credit card transactions conducted through payment networks and recognized upon settlement of the credit card payment transactions.

Contract balances relating to revenues from contracts with customers subject to ASC 606

Contract assets and receivables from contracts with customers subject to ASC 606 are recognized in Accrued income or accounts receivable of Other assets. As of March 31, 2019, the balance of contract assets was not material. Contract liabilities are recognized in unearned income of Other liabilities. As of March 31, 2019, the balance of contract liabilities was not material.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Remaining performance obligations relating to revenues from contracts with customers subject to ASC 606

Remaining performance obligations are services that the MHFG Group has committed to provide in the Group’s consolidated statementfuture in connection with its contracts with customers. As of income, for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017 were ¥57,998 million, ¥61,803 million and ¥79,426 million, respectively.2019, the amount of expected revenues from current obligations to provide services in the future is not material. It excludes revenues from contracts less than one year or contracts that have provisions that allow the Group to recognize revenue at the amount it has the right to invoice.

27. Trading account gains and losses

The MHFG Group performs trading activities through market making, sales, and arbitrage. Accordingly, Trading account gains (losses)���net include gains and losses from transactions undertaken for trading purposes, including both market making for customers and proprietary trading, or transactions through which the Group seeks to capture gains arising from short-term changes in market value. Trading account gains (losses)—net also include

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

gains and losses related to changes in the fair value of derivatives and other financial instruments not eligible for hedge accounting under U.S. GAAP that are utilized to offset mainly interest rate risk related to the Group’s various assets and liabilities, as well as gains and losses related to changes in the fair value of foreign currency-denominatedavailable-for-sale debt securities for which the fair value option has been elected in accordance with ASC 825, “Financial Instruments” (“ASC 825”).reported as Trading securities. Net trading gains (losses) for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2015, 20162017, 2018 and 20172019 are comprised of the following:

 

  2015 2016 2017   2017 2018 2019 
  (in millions of yen)   

 

(in millions of yen)

 

Trading account gains (losses)—net:

       

Trading securities

   635,027  156,559  126,332    126,332  333,749  158,162 

Derivative contracts:

        

Interest rate contracts (1)

   265,324  319,225  (209,361   (209,361 (63,260 127,242 

Foreign exchange contracts(1)

   (93,601 65,101  37,129    37,129  61,046  6,748 

Equity-related contracts (1)(2)

   (101,988 17,970  1,777    1,777  (98,807 37,875 

Credit-related contracts (2)

   (15,171 (1,731 900 

Credit-related contracts (3)

   900  (2,076 269 

Other contracts

   368  2,015  742    742  6,330  (1,455
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

   689,959  559,139  (42,481   (42,481 236,982  328,841 

Foreign exchange gains (losses)—net(3)

   (34,520 113,553  69,453 

Foreign exchange gains (losses)—net(4)

   69,453  91,793  93,577 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net trading gains (losses)

   655,439  672,692  26,972    26,972  328,775  422,418 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

Notes:

(1)

Amounts include gains and losses on currency swaps.

(2)

The net gain (loss) excluded from the assessment of the effectiveness of fair value hedges is included in the above table.

(2)(3)

Amounts do not include the net loss of ¥2,836¥7,594 million, ¥5,230¥754 million and ¥7,594¥736 million on the credit derivatives hedgingeconomically managing the credit risk of loans during the fiscal years ended March 31, 2015, 20162017, 2018 and 2017,2019, respectively. The net loss is recorded in Other noninterest expenses.

(3)(4)

Amounts include realized and unrealized gains and losses on both derivative instruments and nonderivative instruments. Amounts on derivative instruments such asinclude gains and losses on forward foreign exchange contracts and currency options. Amounts on nonderivative instruments include translation gains and losses related to foreign currency-denominatedavailable-for-sale debt securities for which the fair value option has been elected in accordance with ASC 825.reported as Trading securities.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

28. Fair value

Fair value measurements

ASC 820 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. ASC 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. In addition, ASC 820 precludes (1) the deferral of gains and losses at inception of certain derivative contracts whose fair value was not evidenced by market-observable data, and (2) the use of block discounts when measuring the fair value of instruments traded in an active market, which were previously applied to large holdings of publicly traded financial instruments.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Fair value hierarchy

ASC 820 specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques based on whether the inputs to those valuation techniques are observable or unobservable. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

 

Level 1

  Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 1 assets and liabilities include debt and equity securities and derivative contracts that are traded in an active exchange market.

Level 2

  Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. Level 2 assets and liabilities include debt securities with quoted prices that are traded less frequently than exchange-traded instruments. If no quoted market prices are available, the fair values of debt securities andover-the-counter derivative contracts in this category are determined using pricing models with inputs that are observable in the market or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3

  Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation.

Valuation process

The MHFG Group has established valuation policies which govern the principles of fair value measurements and the authority and duty of each department. The Group has also established well-documented procedure manuals which describe valuation techniques and related inputs for determining the fair values of various financial instruments. The policies require that the measurement of fair values be carried out in accordance with the procedures performed by the risk management departments or the back offices which are independent from the front offices. The policies also require the risk management departments to check and verify whether the valuation methodologies defined in the procedure manuals are fair and proper and the internal audit departments to periodically review the compliance with the procedures throughout the Group. Although the valuation methodologies and related inputs are consistently used from period to period, a change in the market environment sometimes leads to a change in the valuation methodologies and the inputs. For instance, a change in market liquidity due to a delisting or a new listing is one of the key drivers of revisions to the valuation methodologies and the inputs. The key drivers also include the availability or the lack of market observable inputs and the development of new valuation methodologies. Price verification performed through the Group’s internal valuation process has an important role

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

in identifying whether the valuation methodologies and the inputs need to be changed. The internal valuation process over the prices broker-dealers provide, primarily for Japanese securitization products, is described in more detail below in “Investments”Available-for-sale securities”. A change in the valuation methodologies and/or the inputs requires the revision of the valuation policies and procedure manuals, which is required to be approved by the appropriate authority, either the CEO, the head of risk management, and/or the head of accounting, depending on the nature and characteristics of the change.

The following is a description of valuation methodologies and inputs used for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, including the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the fair value hierarchy and the MHFG Group’s valuation techniques used to measure fair values. During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017,2019, there were no significant changes made to the Group’s valuation techniques and related inputs.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Trading securities and trading securities sold, not yet purchased

When quoted prices for identical securities are available in an active market, the Group uses the quoted prices to measure the fair values of securities and such securities are classified in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Level 1 securities include highly liquid government bonds and Ginnie Maeequity securities. When quoted prices for identical securities are available, but not actively traded, such securities are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. When no quoted market prices are available, the Group estimates fair values by using pricing models with inputs that are observable in the market and such securities are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Level 2 securities include Japanese local government bonds, corporate bonds, and commercial paper. When less liquid market conditions exist for securities, the quoted prices are stale or the prices from independent sources vary significantly, such securities are generally classified in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The fair values of foreign currency denominated securitization products such as RMBS, CMBS, ABS, and ABSCLO are determined primarily by using a discounted cash flow model. The key inputs used for the model include default rates, recovery rates, prepayment rates, and discount rates. In the event that certain key inputs are unobservable or cannot be corroborated by observable market data, these financial instruments are classified in Level 3.

As it pertains to investment funds, exchange-traded funds (“ETF”) are generally classified in Level 1. Hedge funds the Group invests in are primarily multi strategy funds that employ a fundamentalbottom-up investment approach across various asset classes globally. Hedge funds are measured at the net asset value (“NAV”) per share and the Group has the ability to redeem its investment with the investees at the NAV per share at the measurement date or within the near term. Private equity funds have specific investment objectives in connection with their acquisition of equity interests in new and emerging firms in need of capital. Employing venture capital strategies, they provide financing and other support tostart-up businesses, medium and small entities in particular geographical areas, and to companies with certain technologies or companies in high-growth industries. Real estate funds invest globally and primarily in real estate companies, debt recapitalizations and direct property. Private equity funds and real estate funds are measured at the NAV per share and the Group does not have the ability to redeem its investment in the investees at the NAV per share at the measurement date or within the near term. It is estimated that the underlying assets of the funds would be liquidated within aten-year period.

Derivative financial instruments

Exchange-traded derivatives are valued using quoted market prices and consequently are classified in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. However, the majority of derivatives entered into by the Group are executedover-the-counter and are valued using internal valuation techniques as no quoted market prices are available for such instruments. The valuation techniques depend on the type of derivatives. The principal techniques used to value these instruments are discounted cash flow models and the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which are

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

widely accepted in the financial services industry. The key inputs vary by the type of derivatives and the nature of the underlying instruments and include interest rate yield curves, foreign exchange rates, the spot price of the underlying, volatility and correlation. Each item is classified in either Level 2 or Level 3 depending on the observability of the significant inputs to the model. Level 2 derivatives include plain vanilla interest rate and currency swaps and option contracts. Derivative contracts valued using significant unobservable correlation or volatility are classified in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. In addition, the Group records credit-risk valuation adjustments onover-the-counter derivatives to reflect the credit quality of its counterparties and its own credit quality. The Group calculates these credit-risk valuation adjustments using modeled expected exposure, and default probabilities and severity factors that are developed from market credit spreads and other related market information.

InvestmentsAvailable-for-sale securities

The fair values ofavailable-for-sale securities are determined primarily using the same procedures described forunder trading securities above. Since private placement bonds have no quoted market prices, the fair values of such bonds are estimated based on a discounted cash flow model using interest rates approximating the current rates

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

for instruments with similar maturities and credit risk. Private placement bonds are classified in either Level 2 or Level 3 depending on the observability of the significant inputs to the model, such as credit risk. The fair values of Japanese securitization products such as RMBS, CMBS CDO,and ABS and CLO are generally based upon singlenon-binding quoted prices from broker-dealers. Such quotes are validated through the Group’s internal processes and controls. In rare instances where the Group finds the quoted prices to be invalid through its internal valuation process, it adjusts those prices or alternatively estimates their fair values by using a discounted cash flow model to incorporate the Group’s estimates of key inputs such as the most recent value of each underlying asset, cash flows of the underlying assets, and discount margin. The validation of such prices varies depending on the nature and type of the products. For the majority of RMBS CDO,and ABS, and CLO, broker quotes are validated by investigating significant unusual monthly valuation fluctuations and comparing to prices internally computed through discounted cash flow models using assumptions and parameters provided by brokers such as the cash flows of underlying assets, yield curve, prepayment speed and credit spread. For the majority of CMBS, the Group validates broker quotes through a review process that includes the investigation of significant unusual monthly valuation fluctuations and/or a review of underlying assets with significant differences between the valuations of the Group and the broker-dealers being identified. Though most Japanese securitization products are classified in Level 3, certain securitization products such as Japanese RMBS are classified in Level 2, if the quoted prices are verified through either recent market transactions or a pricing model that can be corroborated by observable market data.

Equity securities

Equity securities mainly consist of marketable equity securities. The fair values of the marketable equity securities are based upon quoted market prices for identical equity securities trading as securities in an active market. Equity securities also include securities measured at the NAV per share. These securities are determined primarily using the same procedures described under trading securities above.

Other investments

Other investments except forconsist of investments held by consolidated investment companies. These companies have not been measured at fair value on a recurring basis. Investments held by consolidated investment companies mainly consist oftypically hold investments in marketable andnon-marketable equity securities and debt securities. The fair value of the marketable equity securities is based upon quoted market prices. The fair value of thenon-marketable equity securities is based upon significant management judgment, as very limited quoted prices exist. When evaluating

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

such securities, the Group firstly considers recent market transactions of identical securities, if applicable. Thereafter, the Group uses commonly accepted valuation techniques such as earnings multiples based on comparable public securities.Non-marketable equity securities are generally classified in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The fair value of the debt securities is estimated using a discounted cash flow model, since they have no quoted market prices. Those debt securities are classified in Level 3, because the credit risk is unobservable.

Long-term debt

Where fairFair value accounting has beenis elected for structured notes, thecertain long-term debt instruments with embedded derivatives. The fair values are determined by incorporatingusing a discounted cash flow model that considers the embedded derivatives and the terms and payment structures of the notes. The fair values of the derivatives embedded derivatives thatin such notes are primarily derived by using the same procedures described for derivativein“Derivative financial instrumentsinstruments” above. Such instrumentsnotes are classified in Level 2 or Level 3 depending on the observability of the significant inputs tointo the model used in determiningto determine the fair value of the embedded derivatives. The Group also measures certain notes that contain embedded derivatives at fair value under the practicability exception. For these instruments, fair value is based on quoted prices for identical debt traded as a security in inactive markets. These instruments are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Items measured at fair value on a recurring basis

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at March 31, 20162018 and 2017,2019, including those for which the MHFG Group has elected the fair value option, are summarized below:

 

2016

  Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Assets/
Liabilities
measured
at fair value
 

2018

  Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Assets/
Liabilities
measured
at fair value
 
  (in billions of yen)   

 

(in billions of yen)

 

Assets:

                

Trading securities(1):

                

Japanese government bonds

   2,272    31    —      2,303    1,375    43    —      1,418 

Japanese local government bonds

   —      79    —      79    —      107    —      107 

U.S. Treasury bonds and federal agency securities

   3,729    77    —      3,806    2,442    209    —      2,651 

Other foreign government bonds

   2,192    373    —      2,565    1,682    480    —      2,162 

Agency mortgage-backed securities

   995    563    —      1,558    —      1,799    —      1,799 

Residential mortgage-backed securities

   —      —      21    21    —      —      12    12 

Commercial mortgage-backed securities

   —      2    2    4 

Certificates of deposit and commercial paper

   —      881    —      881    —      643    —      643 

Corporate bonds and other

   9    1,693    720    2,422    25    1,992    1,013    3,030 

Equity securities

   758    62    21    841    1,642    —      23    1,665 

Trading securities measured at net asset value(2)

         617          705 

Derivatives:

        

Derivative financial instruments:

        

Interest rate contracts

   97    11,396    29    11,522    39    7,089    48    7,176 

Foreign exchange contracts

   23    3,099    8    3,130    17    2,667    13    2,697 

Equity-related contracts

   46    95    29    170    82    110    5    197 

Credit-related contracts

   —      40    3    43    —      16    2    18 

Other contracts

   —      21    38    59    6    8    9    23 

Available-for-sale securities:

                

Japanese government bonds

   15,037    726    —      15,763    12,435    897    —      13,332 

Japanese local government bonds

   —      241    —      241    —      239    —      239 

U.S. Treasury bonds and federal agency securities

   438    —      —      438    686    —      —      686 

Other foreign government bonds

   352    590    —      942    355    703    —      1,058 

Agency mortgage-backed securities

   169    780    —      949    —      889    —      889 

Residential mortgage-backed securities

   —      87    123    210    —      65    54    119 

Commercial mortgage-backed securities

   —      —      187    187    —      —      441    441 

Japanese corporate bonds and other debt securities

   —      1,921    174    2,095    —      1,827    163    1,990 

Foreign corporate bonds and other debt securities

   —      739    108    847    —      799    80    879 

Equity securities (marketable)

   3,716    65    —      3,781 

Equity securities (marketable) (3)

   3,912    121    —      4,033 

Other investments

   —      —      42    42    —      —      38    38 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis

   29,833    23,561    1,505    55,516    24,698    20,703    1,901    48,007 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Liabilities:

                

Trading securities sold, not yet purchased

   2,482    148    —      2,630    2,777    618    4    3,399 

Derivatives:

        

Derivative financial instruments:

        

Interest rate contracts

   98    11,168    3    11,269    42    7,074    27    7,143 

Foreign exchange contracts

   26    2,953    1    2,980    11    2,370    1    2,382 

Equity-related contracts

   60    56    24    140    81    69    1    151 

Credit-related contracts

   —      33    4    37    —      20    1    21 

Other contracts

   —      18    37    55    4    6    9    19 

Long-term debt(3)

   —      433    623    1,056 

Long-term debt(4)

   —      1,395    561    1,956 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis

   2,666    14,809    692    18,167    2,915    11,552    604    15,071 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

2017

  Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Assets/
Liabilities
measured
at fair value
 

2019

  Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Assets/
Liabilities
measured
at fair value
 
  (in billions of yen)   

 

(in billions of yen)

 

Assets:

                

Trading securities(1):

                

Japanese government bonds

   1,485    23    —      1,508    1,829    33    —      1,862 

Japanese local government bonds

   —      69    —      69    —      134    —      134 

U.S. Treasury bonds and federal agency securities

   2,883    80    —      2,963    1,069    138    —      1,207 

Other foreign government bonds

   1,127    457    —      1,584    2,417    553    —      2,970 

Agency mortgage-backed securities

   1,335    638    —      1,973    —      1,041    —      1,041 

Residential mortgage-backed securities

   —      —      15    15    —      —      11    11 

Commercial mortgage-backed securities

   —      3    —      3 

Certificates of deposit and commercial paper

   —      554    —      554    —      1,047    —      1,047 

Corporate bonds and other

   3    1,449    1,052    2,504    36    1,806    1,044    2,886 

Equity securities

   1,661    20    23    1,704    1,297    —      28    1,325 

Trading securities measured at net asset value(2)

         678          631 

Derivatives:

        

Derivative financial instruments:

        

Interest rate contracts

   37    8,442    27    8,506    36    5,729    21    5,786 

Foreign exchange contracts

   28    2,709    8    2,745    9    1,927    23    1,959 

Equity-related contracts

   31    89    14    134    58    63    4    125 

Credit-related contracts

   —      33    2    35    —      16    2    18 

Other contracts

   1    11    11    23    2    4    10    16 

Available-for-sale securities:

                

Japanese government bonds

   9,543    720    —      10,263    10,902    995    —      11,897 

Japanese local government bonds

   —      284    —      284    —      210    —      210 

U.S. Treasury bonds and federal agency securities

   1,144    —      —      1,144    1,009    —      —      1,009 

Other foreign government bonds

   346    589    —      935    456    886    —      1,342 

Agency mortgage-backed securities

   134    709    —      843    —      544    —      544 

Residential mortgage-backed securities

   —      67    77    144    —      61    40    101 

Commercial mortgage-backed securities

   —      —      224    224    —      —      500    500 

Japanese corporate bonds and other debt securities

   —      1,834    174    2,008    —      1,629    120    1,749 

Foreign corporate bonds and other debt securities

   —      801    110    911    —      678    103    781 

Equity securities (marketable)

   3,717    84    —      3,801 

Equity securities (3):

        

Equity securities with readily determinable fair values

   3,633    135    —      3,768 

Equity securities measured at net asset value(2)

         53 

Other investments

   —      —      37    37    —      —      35    35 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis

   23,475    19,665    1,774    45,592    22,753    17,629    1,941    43,007 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Liabilities:

                

Trading securities sold, not yet purchased

   1,993    228    —      2,221    2,380    199    1    2,580 

Derivatives:

        

Derivative financial instruments:

        

Interest rate contracts

   46    8,426    1    8,473    38    5,564    8    5,610 

Foreign exchange contracts

   20    2,591    —      2,611    11    1,746    1    1,758 

Equity-related contracts

   129    61    39    229    82    51    9    142 

Credit-related contracts

   —      34    2    36    —      16    1    17 

Other contracts

   1    10    11    22    1    4    9    14 

Long-term debt(3)

   —      903    593    1,496 

Long-term debt(4)

   —      1,778    655    2,433 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis

   2,189    12,253    646    15,088    2,512    9,358    684    12,554 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

Notes:

(1)

Trading securities include foreign currency denominated securities for which the MHFG Group elected the fair value option.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(2)

In accordance with ASC 820, certain investments that are measured at fair value using the net asset value per share (or its equivalent) practical expedient have not been classified in the fair value hierarchy. The fair

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

value amounts presented for these classes of assets are intended to permit the reconciliation of the fair value hierarchy to the amounts presented in the statements of financial position. The amounts of unfunded commitments related to these investments at March 31, 20162018 and 20172019 were ¥30¥31 billion and ¥33¥37 billion, respectively.
(3)

The MHFG Group adopted ASUNo.2016-01 on April 1, 2018. In connection with the adoption, equity securities are no longer classified asavailable-for-sale securities. See Note 2 “Recently issued accounting pronouncements” for further details.

(4)

Amounts represent items for which the Group elected the fair value option.option or for which it applied the practicability exception.

Items measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)

The following table presents a reconciliation for all assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the fiscal years ended March 31, 20162018 and 2017:2019:

 

2016

 April 1,
2015
 Gains
(losses) in
Earnings
 Gains
(losses) in
OCI
 Transfers
into
Level 3
 Transfers
out of
Level 3
 Purchases Sales Issuances Settlements March 31,
2016
 Change in
unrealized
gains

(losses)
still held (6)
 

2018

 April 1,
2017
 Gains
(losses) in
Earnings
 Gains
(losses)
in OCI
 Transfers
into
Level 3
 Transfers
out of
Level 3
 Purchases Sales Issuances Settle-
ments
 March 31,
2018
 Change in
unrealized
gains

(losses)
still held (6)
 
 (in billions of yen)  

 

(in billions of yen)

 

Assets:

                      

Trading securities:

                      

Other foreign government bonds

  —     —  (2)   —     —     —    1  (1  —     —     —     —   

Residential mortgage-backed securities

 29   —  (2)   —     —     —     —     —     —    (8 21   —    15  —  (2)   —     —     —     —     —     —    (3 12   —   

Commercial mortgage-backed securities

 4   —  (2)   —     —     —     —     —     —    (2 2   —   

Corporate bonds and other

 639   (43)(2)   —    25  (34 452  (192  —    (127 720  (38 1,052  (20)(2)   —    123  (241 1,082  (631  —    (352 1,013  (19

Equity securities

 23   (3)(2)   —     —     —    1   —     —     —    21  (1 23  (1)(2)   —     —     —    2  (1  —     —    23   —   

Derivatives, net (1):

           

Derivative financial instruments,
net(1):

           

Interest rate contracts

 18   (1)(2)   —     —     —     —     —     —    9  26  11  26  (6)(2)   —     —     —     —     —     —    1  21  (1

Foreign exchange contracts

 8   (1)(2)   —     —     —     —     —     —     —    7  (2 8  2(2)   —     —     —     —     —     —    2  12  5 

Equity-related contracts

 (14  22(2)   —     —     —     —     —     —    (3 5  14  (25 1(2)   —     —     —     —     —     —    28  4  12 

Credit-related contracts

 (1  —  (2)   —     —     —     —     —     —     —    (1  —     —    —  (2)   —     —     —     —     —     —    1  1   —   

Other contracts

  —     1(2)   —     —     —     —     —     —     —    1  1   —    (1)(2)   —     —     —     —     —     —    1   —     —   

Available-for-sale securities:

                      

Residential mortgage-backed securities

 166   —  (3)   —  (4)   —     —     —    (4  —    (39 123   —    77  —  (3)  —  (4)   —     —    3  (6  —    (20 54   —   

Commercial mortgage-backed securities

 169   —  (3)   —  (4)   —     —    102  (62  —    (22 187   —    224  —  (3)  3(4)   —     —    286  (69  —    (3 441   —   

Japanese corporate bonds and other debt securities

 155   (2)(3)   —  (4)   —     —    67  (3  —    (43 174  (4 174  11(3)  (10)(4)   —     —    17   —     —    (29 163  11 

Foreign corporate bonds and other debt securities

 85   2(3)   (5)(4)  23   —    41   —     —    (38 108   —    110  —  (3)  (1)(4)  15  (46 2   —     —     —    80   —   

Other investments

 53   7(3)   —     —     —    5  (20  —    (3 42  (7 37  —  (3)   —     —     —    14  (3  —    (10 38   —   

Liabilities:

                      

Trading securities sold, not yet purchased

  —     (2)   —     —     —    (5 5   —     —     —     —     —    —  (2)   —     —     —    (146 150   —     —    4   —   

Long-term debt

 587   18(5)   —    8   —    (1  —    305  (258 623  19  593  3(5)   —    1  (10  —     —    151  (171 561  5 

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

2017

 April 1,
2016
 Gains
(losses) in
Earnings
 Gains
(losses) in
OCI
 Transfers
into
Level 3
 Transfers
out of
Level 3
 Purchases Sales Issuances Settlements March 31,
2017
 Change in
unrealized
gains

(losses)
still held (6)
 

2019

 April 1,
2018
 Gains
(losses) in
Earnings
 Gains
(losses)
in OCI
 Transfers
into
Level 3
 Transfers
out of
Level 3
 Purchases Sales Issuances Settle-
ments
 March 31,
2019
 Change in
unrealized
gains

(losses)
still held (6)
 
 (in billions of yen)  

 

(in billions of yen)

 

Assets:

                      

Trading securities:

                      

Residential mortgage-backed securities

 21   (1)(2)   —     —     —     —     —     —    (5 15  (1 12  —  (2)   —     —     —     —     —     —    (1 11   —   

Commercial mortgage-backed securities

 2   —  (2)   —     —     —     —     —     —    (2  —     —   

Corporate bonds and other

 720   12(2)   —    296  (39 875  (555  —    (257 1,052  19  1,013  1(2)   —     —     —    762  (378  —    (354 1,044  8 

Equity securities

 21   1(2)   —     —     —    3  (2  —     —    23   —    23  1(2)   —     —     —    7  (3  —     —    28  (1

Derivatives, net (1):

           

Derivative financial instruments, net (1):

           

Interest rate contracts

 26   (2)(2)   —     —     —     —     —     —    2  26  2  21  (11)(2)   —     —     —     —     —     —    3  13  (5

Foreign exchange contracts

 7   7(2)   —     —     —     —     —     —    (6 8  1  12  15(2)   —     —     —     —     —     —    (5 22  14 

Equity-related contracts

 5   (31)(2)   —     —     —     —     —     —    1  (25 (35 4  (15)(2)   —     —     —     —     —     —    6  (5 3 

Credit-related contracts

 (1  1(2)   —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —    1  (2)(2)   —     —     —     —     —     —    2  1  1 

Other contracts

 1   —  (2)   —     —     —     —     —     —    (1  —     —     —    1(2)   —     —     —     —     —     —     —    1  1 

Available-for-sale securities:

                      

Residential mortgage-backed securities

 123   —  (3)   (1)(4)   —     —     —    (7  —    (38 77   —    54  —  (3)  —  (4)   —     —     —     —     —    (14 40   —   

Commercial mortgage-backed securities

 187   —  (3)   1(4)   —     —    63  (12  —    (15 224   —    441  —  (3)  1(4)   —     —    144  (72  —    (14 500   —   

Japanese corporate bonds and other debt securities

 174   (1)(3)   43(4)   —     —    10  (19  —    (33 174   —    163  37(3)  (33)(4)   —     —    29  (7  —    (69 120  19 

Foreign corporate bonds and other debt securities

 108   1(3)   (1)(4)   —    (2 10   —     —    (6 110   —    80  —  (3)  (1)(4)  61  (42 27   —     —    (22 103   —   

Other investments

 42   —  (3)   —     —     —    12  (3  —    (14 37   —    38  5(3)   —     —     —    13  (6  —    (15 35  (2

Liabilities:

                      

Trading securities sold, not yet purchased

  —     —  (2)   —    1   —    (54 53   —     —     —     —    4  1(2)   —     —     —    (35 33   —     —    1   —   

Long-term debt

 623   20(5)   —    21  (12 (2 1  278  (296 593  18  561  (6)(5)  10(4)  7   —     —     —    192  (101 655  5 

 

Notes:

(1)

Total Level 3 derivative exposures have been netted on the table for presentation purposes only.

(2)

Gains (losses) in Earnings are reported in Trading account gains (losses)—net, Foreign exchange gains (losses)—net or Other noninterest income (expenses).

(3)

Gains (losses) in Earnings are reported in Investment gains (losses)—net.

(4)

Gains (losses) in OCI are reported in Other comprehensive income (loss).

(5)

Gains (losses) in Earnings are reported in Other noninterest income (expenses).

(6)

Amounts represent total gains or losses recognized in earnings during the period. These gains or losses were attributable to the change in fair value relating to assets and liabilities classified as Level 3 that were still held at March 31, 20162018 and 2017.2019.

Transfers between levels

Transfers of assets or liabilities between levels of the fair value hierarchy are assumed to occur at the beginning of the period.

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016,2018, the transfers into Level 3 included ¥25¥123 billion of Trading securities, ¥23¥15 billion ofAvailable-for-sale securities and ¥8¥1 billion of Long-term debt. Transfers into Level 3 for Trading

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

securities andAvailable-for-sale securities were primarily due to decreased liquidity for certain Japanese and foreignForeign corporate bonds. Transfers into Level 3 for Long-term debt were primarily due to changes in the impact of unobservable inputs on the value of certain structured notes. During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016,2018, the transfers out of Level 3 included ¥34 billion of Trading securities. Transfers out of Level 3 for Trading securities were primarily due to increased price transparency for certain Japanese and foreign corporate bonds.

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, the transfers into Level 3 included ¥296¥241 billion of Trading securities, ¥1 billion of Trading securities sold, not yet purchased and ¥21 billion of Long-term debt. Transfers into Level 3 for Trading securities and Trading securities sold, not yet purchased were primarily due to decreased liquidity for certain Japanese and foreign corporate bonds. Transfers into Level 3 for Long-term debt were primarily due to changes in the impact of unobservable inputs on the value of certain structured notes. During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, the transfers out of Level 3 included ¥39 billion of Trading securities, ¥2¥46 billion ofAvailable-for-sale securities and ¥12¥10 billion of Long-term debt. Transfers out of Level 3 for Trading securities were primarily due to increased price transparency for certain Japanese and foreign corporate bonds. Transfers out of Level 3 for

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Available-for-sale securities were primarily due to increased liquidity for certain Foreign corporate bonds and other debt securities. Transfers out of Level 3 for Long-term debt were primarily due to changes in the impact of unobservable inputs on the value of certain structured notes.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019, the transfers into Level 3 included ¥61 billion ofAvailable-for-sale securities and ¥7 billion of Long-term debt. Transfers into Level 3 forAvailable-for-sale securities were primarily due to decreased liquidity for certain Foreign corporate bonds. Transfers into Level 3 for Long-term debt were primarily due to changes in the impact of unobservable inputs on the value of certain structured notes. During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019, the transfers out of Level 3 included ¥42 billion ofAvailable-for-sale securities. Transfers out of Level 3 forAvailable-for-sale securities were primarily due to increased liquidity for certain Foreign corporate bonds and other debt securities.

Quantitative information about Level 3 fair value measurements

The following table presents information about significant unobservable inputs related to the MHFG Group’s material classes of Level 3 assets and liabilities at March 31, 20162018 and 2017:2019:

 

2016

 

2018

2018

 

Products/Instruments

 Fair value 

Principal valuation technique

 

Unobservable inputs

 Range of input values Weighted average (5)  Fair value 

Principal valuation technique

 

Unobservable inputs

 Range of input values 

Weighted average (5)

 
(in billions of yen, except for percentages and basis points)(in billions of yen, except for percentages and basis points) 

(in billions of yen, except for percentages and basis points)

 

Trading securities andAvailable-for-sale securities:

          

Residential mortgage-backed securities

  144  Discounted cash flow Prepayment rate  3%–19%   7%   66  Discounted cash flow Prepayment rate  3%–17%   7% 
 Price-based Default rate  0%–2%   0%   Price-based Default rate  0%–1%   0% 
  Recovery rate  100%–100%   100%    Recovery rate  100%–100%   100% 
   Discount margin  13bps–180bps   60bps    Discount margin  17bps–170bps   50bps 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

Commercial mortgage-backed securities

  189  

Discounted cash flow

Price-based

 Discount margin  6bps–580bps   37bps   441  

Discounted cash flow

Price-based

 Discount margin  9bps–141bps   28bps 
   

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

Corporate bonds and other debt securities

  1,002  Discounted cash flow Prepayment rate (1)  0%–21%   19%   1,256  Discounted cash flow Prepayment rate (1)  26%–37%   36% 
 Price-based Default rate (1)  0%–2%   2%   Price-based Default rate (1)  1%–2%   2% 
  Recovery rate (1)  60%–69%   68%    Recovery rate (1)  60%–69%   68% 
   Discount margin (1)  11bps–1,115bps   151bps    Discount margin (1)  12bps–1,165bps   115bps 
   Discount margin (2)  10bps–3,850bps   454bps    Discount margin (2)  5bps–1,064bps   379bps 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

Derivatives, net:

     

Derivative financial instruments, net:

     

Interest rate contracts

  26  Internal valuation model (3) IR – IR correlation  32%–100%    21  Internal valuation model (3) IR – IR correlation  23%–100%  
  Default rate (4)  0%–63%     Default rate (4)  0%–63%  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

Foreign exchange contracts

  7  Internal valuation model (3) FX – IR correlation  5%–50%    12  Internal valuation model (3) FX – IR correlation  16%–53%  
  FX – FX correlation  54%–54%     FX – FX correlation  61%–61%  
   Default rate (4)  0%–63%     Default rate (4)  0%–63%  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

Equity-related contracts

  5  Internal valuation model (3) Equity – IR correlation  30%–30%    4  Internal valuation model (3) Equity – IR correlation  25%–25%  
  Equity – FX correlation  55%–55%     Equity volatility  12%–41%  
   Equity volatility  10%–40%  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

Credit-related contracts

  (1)  Internal valuation model (3) Default rate  0%–42%    1  Internal valuation model (3) Default rate  0%–3%  
  Credit correlation  29%–100%     Credit correlation  27%–100%  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

Long-term debt

  623  Internal valuation model (3) IR – IR correlation  32%–100%    561  Internal valuation model (3) IR – IR correlation  23%–100%  
   FX – IR correlation  5%–50%     FX – IR correlation  9%–53%  
   FX – FX correlation  54%–54%     FX – FX correlation  61%–61%  
   Equity – IR correlation  30%–30%     Equity – IR correlation  25%–25%  
   Equity – FX correlation  55%–55%     Equity – FX correlation  55%–70%  
   Equity correlation  18%–100%     Equity correlation  24%–100%  
   Equity volatility  14%–39%     Equity volatility  13%–56%  
   Default rate  0%–5%     Default rate  0%–2%  
   Credit correlation  28%–100%     Credit correlation  28%–100%  

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

2017

 

2019

2019

 

Products/Instruments

 Fair value 

Principal valuation technique

 

Unobservable inputs

 Range of input values Weighted average (5)  Fair value 

Principal valuation technique

 

Unobservable inputs

 Range of input values 

Weighted average (5)

 
(in billions of yen, except for percentages and basis points)(in billions of yen, except for percentages and basis points) 

(in billions of yen, except for percentages and basis points)

 

Trading securities andAvailable-for-sale securities:

          

Residential mortgage-backed securities

 92 Discounted cash flow Prepayment rate  0%–18%  7% 
 Price-based Default rate  0%–1%  0% 
  Recovery rate  100%–100%  100% 
  Discount margin  15bps–170bps  55bps 

Residential mortgage-
backed securities

  51  Discounted cash flow Prepayment rate  4%–19%   8% 
 Price-based Default rate  0%–1%   0% 
  Recovery rate  100%–100%   100% 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

    Discount margin  18bps–170bps   51bps 

Commercial mortgage-backed securities

 224 

Discounted cash flow

Price-based

 Discount margin  4bps–205bps   28bps 
 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

Commercial mortgage-backed securities

224 

Discounted cash flow

Price-based

 Discount margin  4bps–205bps   28bps   500  

Discounted cash flow

Price-based

 Discount margin  9bps–161bps   24bps 
  

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

Corporate bonds and other debt securities

 1,336 Discounted cash flow Prepayment rate (1)  16%–30%  29%   1,267  Discounted cash flow Prepayment rate (1)  22%–22%   22% 
 Price-based Default rate (1)  1%–2%  2%   Price-based Default rate (1)  2%–2%   2% 
  Recovery rate (1)  60%–68%  68%    Recovery rate (1)  69%–69%   69% 
  Discount margin (1)  8bps–1,181bps  131bps 
  Discount margin (2)  10bps–939bps  359bps 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

    Discount margin (1)  48bps–1,173bps   134bps 

Derivatives, net:

     
   Discount margin (2)  4bps–1,063bps   295bps 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

Derivative financial instruments, net:

     

Interest rate contracts

 26 Internal valuation model (3) IR – IR correlation  23%–100%    13  Internal valuation model (3) IR – IR correlation  23%–100%  
  Default rate (4)  0%–63%     Default rate (4)  0%–63%  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

Foreign exchange contracts

 8 Internal valuation model (3) FX – IR correlation  5%–52%    22  Internal valuation model (3) FX – IR correlation  9%–55%  
  FX – FX correlation  55%–55%     FX – FX correlation  63%–63%  
   Default rate (4)  0%–63%     Default rate (4)  0%–63%  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

Equity-related contracts

 (25) Internal valuation model (3) Equity – IR correlation  25%–25%    (5 Internal valuation model (3) Equity – IR correlation  25%–25%  
  Equity – FX correlation  55%–55%     Equity correlation  40%–100%  
   Equity volatility  6%–59%     Equity volatility  5%–36%  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

Credit-related contracts

 —   Internal valuation model (3) Default rate  0%–5%    1  Internal valuation model (3) Default rate  0%–5%  
  Credit correlation  30%–100%     Credit correlation  29%–100%  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

Long-term debt

 593 Internal valuation model (3) IR – IR correlation  23%–100%    655  Internal valuation model (3) IR – IR correlation  23%–100%  
   FX – IR correlation  5%–52%     FX – IR correlation  9%–55%  
   FX – FX correlation  55%–55%     FX – FX correlation  63%–63%  
   Equity – IR correlation  25%–25%     Equity – IR correlation  25%–25%  
   Equity – FX correlation  55%–55%     Equity – FX correlation  55%–88%  
   Equity correlation  20%–100%     Equity correlation  12%–100%  
   Equity volatility  5%–40%     Equity volatility  5%–49%  
   Default rate  0%–3%     Default rate  0%–4%  
   Credit correlation  33%–100%     Credit correlation  20%–100%  

 

Notes:

(1)

These inputs are mainly used for determining the fair values of securitization products such as CDO, CLO and ABS, other than RMBS and CMBS.

(2)

This input is mainly used for determining the fair values of Japanese corporate bonds and foreign corporate bonds.

(3)

Internal valuation model includes discounted cash flow models and the Black-Scholes option pricing model.

(4)

This input represents the counterparty default rate derived from the MHFG Group’s own internal credit analyses.

(5)

Weighted averages are calculated by weighting each input by the relative fair value of the respective financial instruments.

IR = Interest rate

FX = Foreign exchange

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Sensitivities to unobservable inputs and interrelationships between unobservable inputs

The following is a description of the sensitivities and interrelationships of the significant unobservable inputs used to measure the fair values of Level 3 assets and liabilities.

(1) Prepayment rate

The prepayment rate is the estimated rate at which voluntary unscheduled repayments of the principal of the underlying assets are expected to occur. The movement of the prepayment rate is generally negatively correlated with borrower delinquency. A change in prepayment rate would impact the valuation of the fair values of financial instruments either positively or negatively, depending on the structure of financial instruments.

(2) Default rate

The default rate is an estimate of the likelihood of not collecting contractual payments. An increase in the default rate would generally be accompanied by a decrease in the recovery rate and an increase in the discount margin. It would also generally impact the valuation of the fair values of financial instruments negatively.

(3) Recovery rate

The recovery rate is an estimate of the percentage of contractual payments that would be collected in the event of a default. An increase in recovery rate would generally be accompanied by a decrease in the default rate. It would also generally impact the valuation of the fair values of financial instruments positively.

(4) Discount margin

The discount margin is the portion of the interest rate over a benchmark market interest rate such as LIBOR or swap rates. It primarily consists of a risk premium component which is the amount of compensation that market participants require due to the uncertainty inherent in the financial instruments’ cash flows resulting from credit risk. An increase in discount margin would generally impact the valuation of the fair values of financial instruments negatively.

(5) Correlation

Correlation is the likelihood of the movement of one input relative to another based on an established relationship. The change in correlation would impact the valuation of derivatives either positively or negatively, depending on the nature of the underlying assets.

(6) Volatility

Volatility is a measure of the expected change in variables over a fixed period of time. Some financial instruments benefit from an increase in volatility and others benefit from a decrease in volatility. Generally, for a long position in an option, an increase in volatility would result in an increase in the fair values of financial instruments.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Items measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis

Certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. These assets and liabilities primarily include items that are measured at the lower of cost or fair value, and items that were initially measured at cost and have been written down to fair value as a result of impairment. The following table shows the fair value hierarchy for these items as of March 31, 20162018 and 2017:2019:

 

2016

  Total   Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Aggregate cost 

2018

  Total   Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Aggregate cost 
  (in billions of yen)   

 

(in billions of yen)

 

Assets:

                    

Loans

   124    —      —      124    197    113   —      —      113   164

Loansheld-for-sale

   13    —      7    6    14    60   —      60   —      74

Other investments

   1    —      —      1    2 

Equity securities (without readily determinable fair values)

   1   —      —      1   3

Premises and equipment—net

   —      —      —      —      1    —      —      —      —      4

Goodwill

   —      —      —      —      6 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis

   138    —      7    131    220    174   —      60   114   245
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

2017

  Total   Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Aggregate cost 

2019

  Total   Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Aggregate cost 
  (in billions of yen)   

 

(in billions of yen)

 

Assets:

                    

Loans

   124    —      —      124    194    125    —      41   84    177 

Loansheld-for-sale

   7    —      7    —      8    3   —      3   —      3

Equity securities (without readily determinable fair values)

   1   —      —      1   1

Other investments

   7    6    —      1    11    98   98   —      —      104

Premises and equipment—net

   7    —      6    1    11    9   —      4   5   34

Intangible assets

   —      —      —      —      1
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis

   145    6    13    126    224    236    98   48   90    320 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Note:

The fair values may not be current as of the dates indicated, but rather as of the date the fair value change occurred. Accordingly, the carrying values may not equal current fair value.

Loans in the table above have been impaired and measured based upon the observable market price of the loan or the fair value of the underlying collateral.

Loansheld-for-sale in the table above are accounted for at the lower of cost or fair value at the end of the period. The items for which fair values are determined by using actual or contractually determined selling price data are classified as Level 2. Due to the lack of current observable market information, the determination of the fair values for items other than the aforementioned requires significant adjustment based upon management judgment and estimation, which results in such items being classified in Level 3 of the hierarchy.

Equity securities (without readily determinable fair values) in the table above consist ofnon-marketable equity securities which are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, using the measurement alternative fornon-marketable equity securities. These equity securities are on a nonrecurring basis either (1) written down to fair value as a result of impairment or (2) adjusted upward or downward to fair value as a result of transactions observed for the identical or similar securities of the same issuer. The fair values of the impairednon-marketable equity securities are determined primarily by using a liquidation value technique. As significant management judgment or estimation is required in the determination of the fair values ofnon-marketable equity securities, they are classified as Level 3.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Other investments in the table above which consist ofinclude certain equity method investments andnon-marketable equity securities,which have been impaired and written down to fair value. The fair values of the impaired marketable equity method investments are determined by their quoted market prices. As the securities are traded on an active exchange market, they are classified as Level 1. The fair values of the impairednon-marketable equity securities, which includenon-marketable equity method investments, are determined primarily by using a liquidation value technique. As significant management judgment or estimation is required in the determination of the fair values ofnon-marketable equity securities, they are classified as Level 3.

Premises and equipment—net and Intangible assets in the table above have been impaired and written down to fair value.

Goodwill in the table above is entirely related to Banco Mizuho do Brasil S.A. reporting unit. Due to the decline in the fair value of the reporting unit, the carrying amount of the goodwill was reduced to its fair value which is based on the market approach and an impairment loss was recognized. As the determination of the fair value of the goodwill required significant management judgment and estimation, it is classified as Level 3.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Fair value option

The MHFG Group elected the fair value option for certain eligible financial instruments described below.

Foreign currency denominatedavailable-for-sale debt securities

Prior to the adoption of the fair value option in accordance with ASC 825, the changes in fair value of foreign currency denominatedavailable-for-sale securities had been accounted for in AOCI, while the changes in fair value caused by foreign exchange fluctuations of foreign currency denominated financial liabilities had been accounted for in earnings. The MHFG Group elected the fair value option for theseforeign currency denominated debt securities to mitigate the volatility in earnings due to the difference in the recognition of foreign exchange risk betweenavailable-for-sale foreign currency denominated debt securities and financial liabilities. Following the election of the fair value option, these debt securities have beenare reported as trading securities in Trading account assets. On April 1, 2018, the Group adopted ASUNo.2016-01. Before the adoption of the ASU, the fair value option was elected for foreign currency denominated equity securities, which were reported as trading securities, but after the adoption of the ASU, the Group no longer elected the fair value option for these equity securities.

Certain hybrid financial instruments

The MHFG Group issues structured notes as part of its client-driven activities. Structured notes are debt instruments that contain embedded derivatives. The Group elected the fair value option for certain structured notes to mitigate accounting mismatches and to achieve operational simplifications. In addition, the Group measures certain notes that contain embedded derivatives at fair value under the practicability exception. These notes continue to be reported in Long-term debt and interest on these notes continues to be reported in Interest expense on long-term debt based on the contractual rates. The differences between the aggregate fair value of these notes and the aggregate unpaid principal balance of such instruments were ¥20¥21 billion and ¥36¥21 billion at March 31, 20162018 and 2017,2019, respectively. The net unrealized gains (losses) resulting from changes in fair values of these notes of ¥14 billion and ¥16 billion, which included the fair value changes attributable to changes in the Group’s own credit risk, were recorded in Other noninterest income (expenses) were of ¥(15) billion and ¥(17) billion for the fiscal years ended March 31, 20162018 and 2017,2019, respectively. The Group records changes in fair value on these notes attributable to the instrument-specific credit risk in AOCI in accordance with ASUNo.2016-01, which was adopted on April 1, 2018. Changes in fair value resulting from changes in instrument-specific credit risk were estimated by incorporating the Company’s current credit spreads observable in the bond market.

Fair value of financial instruments

ASC 825 requires the disclosure of the estimated fair value of financial instruments. The fair value of financial instruments is the amount that would be exchanged between willing parties, other than in a forced sale or liquidation. Quoted market prices, if available, are best utilized as estimates of the fair values of financial instruments. However, since no quoted market prices are available for certain financial instruments, fair values for such financial instruments have been estimated based on management’s assumptions, discounted cash flow models or other valuation techniques. Such estimation methods are described in more detail below. These estimates could be significantly affected by different sets of assumptions. There are certain limitations to management’s best judgment in estimating fair values of financial instruments and inherent subjectivity involved

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

in estimation methodologies and assumptions used to estimate fair value. Accordingly, the net realizable or liquidation values could be materially different from the estimates presented below.

ASC 825 does not require the disclosure of the fair value of nonfinancial instruments.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for estimating the fair value of financial assets and liabilities not carried at fair value on the MHFG Group’s consolidated balance sheets.

Cash and due from banks, interest-bearing deposits in other banks, call loans and funds sold, and receivables under resale agreements and securities borrowing transactions

The carrying value of short-term financial assets, such as cash and due from banks, interest-bearing deposits in other banks, call loans and funds sold, and receivables under resale agreements and securities borrowing transactions approximates the fair value of these assets since they generally involve limited losses from credit risk or have short-term maturities with interest rates that approximate market rates.

Investments

The fair value ofheld-to-maturity securities is determined primarily by using the same procedures and techniques described for trading securities andavailable-for-sale securities aforementioned in this Note. The fair value of other equity interests, which primarily comprisesnon-marketable equity securities is not readily determinable, nor practicable to estimate, due to the lack of available information. Their carrying amounts of ¥313¥267 billion and ¥308¥212 billion at March 31, 20162018 and 2017,2019, respectively, were not included in the disclosure.

Loans

Performing loansLoans have been fair valued as groups of similar loans based on the type of loan, credit quality, prepayment assumptions and remaining maturity. The fair value of performing loans is determined based on discounted cash flows using interest rates approximating the MHFG Group’s current rates for similar loans. The fair value of collateral dependent impaired loans is determined based on either discounted cash flows incorporating the Group’s best estimate of the expected future cash flows or the fair value of the underlying collateral, if impaired loans are collateral dependent.collateral.

Other financial assets

The carrying value of other financial assets, which primarily consist of accounts receivable from brokers, dealers, and customers for securities transactions, accrued income and collateral provided for derivative transactions, approximates the fair value of these assets since they generally involve limited losses from credit risk or have short-term maturities with interest rates that approximate market rates. The majority of other financial assets is classified as Level 2, and included in the table in Note 13 “Other assets and liabilities”.

Noninterest-bearing deposits, call money and funds purchased, and payables under repurchase agreements and securities lending transactions

The carrying value of short-term financial liabilities, such as noninterest-bearing deposits, call money and funds purchased, and payables under repurchase agreements and securities lending transactions approximates the fair value of these liabilities since they generally have short-term maturities with interest rates that approximate market rates.

Interest-bearing deposits

The carrying value of demand deposits approximates the fair value since it represents the amount payable on demand at the balance sheet date. The fair value of time deposits and certificates of deposit is primarily estimated

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

based on discounted cash flow analysis using current interest rates for instruments with similar maturities. The carrying value of short-term certificates of deposit approximates the fair value.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Due to trust accounts

The carrying value of due to trust accounts approximates the fair value since they generally have short-term maturities with interest rates that approximate market rates.

Other short-term borrowings

The carrying value of the majority of other short-term borrowings approximates the fair value since they generally have short-term maturities with interest rates that approximate market rates. The fair value of certain borrowings is estimated based on discounted cash flow analysis using interest rates approximating the MHFG Group’s incremental borrowing rates for instruments with similar maturities.

Long-term debt

Long-term debt is fair valued using quoted market prices, if available. Otherwise, the fair value of long-term debt is estimated based on discounted cash flow analysis using interest rates approximating the MHFG Group’s incremental borrowing rates for instruments with similar maturities.

Other financial liabilities

The carrying value of other financial liabilities, which primarily consist of accounts payable to brokers, dealers, and customers for securities transactions, accrued expenses and collateral accepted for derivative transactions, approximates the fair value since they generally have short-term maturities with interest rates that approximate market rates. The majority of other financial liabilities is classified as Level 2, and included in the table in Note 13 “Other assets and liabilities”.

The fair value of certainoff-balance-sheet financial instruments, such as commitments to extend credit and commercial letters of credit, was not considered material to the consolidated balance sheets at March 31, 20162018 and 2017.2019.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

The following table shows the carrying amounts and fair values at March 31, 20162018 and 2017,2019, of certain financial instruments, excluding financial instruments which are carried at fair value on a recurring basis and those outside the scope of ASC 825 such as equity method investments as defined in ASC 323, “Investments—Equity Method and Joint Ventures” (“ASC 323”) and lease contracts as defined in ASC 840, “Leases” (“ASC 840”):

 

  2016   2018 
  Carrying
amount
   Estimated fair value   Carrying
amount
   Estimated fair value 
  Total   Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Total   Level 1   Level 2   Level 3 
  (in billions of yen)   

 

(in billions of yen)

 

Financial assets:

                    

Cash and due from banks, call loans and funds sold, and receivables under resale agreements and securities borrowing transactions

   48,757    48,757    923    47,834    —   

Cash and due from banks, interest-bearing deposits in other banks, call loans and funds sold, and receivables under resale agreements and securities borrowing transactions

   61,381    61,381    1,206    60,175    —   

Investments

   4,819    4,873    4,873    —      —      2,518    2,522    1,984    538    —   

Loans, net of allowance for loan losses(Note)

   77,040    78,241    —      —      78,241    83,088    84,041    —      —      84,041 

Financial liabilities:

                    

Noninterest-bearing deposits, call money and funds purchased, and payables under repurchase agreements and securities lending transactions

   39,908    39,908    17,223    22,685    —      43,921    43,921    22,898    21,023    —   

Interest-bearing deposits

   100,228    100,234    46,207    54,027    —      113,558    113,540    61,719    51,821    —   

Due to trust accounts

   4,467    4,467    —      4,467    —      3,993    3,993    —      3,993    —   

Other short-term borrowings

   2,080    2,080    —      2,080    —      1,688    1,688    —      1,688    —   

Long-term debt

   13,691    13,863    —      12,969    894    10,970    10,995    —      10,098    897 
  2017 
  Carrying
amount
   Estimated fair value 
  Total   Level 1   Level 2   Level 3 
  (in billions of yen) 

Financial assets:

          

Cash and due from banks, call loans and funds sold, and receivables under resale agreements and securities borrowing transactions

   60,943    60,943    1,063    59,880    —   

Investments

   3,817    3,846    3,846    —      —   

Loans, net of allowance for loan losses(Note)

   81,662    82,696    —      —      82,696 

Financial liabilities:

          

Noninterest-bearing deposits, call money and funds purchased, and payables under repurchase agreements and securities lending transactions

   42,205    42,205    20,544    21,661    —   

Interest-bearing deposits

   110,125    110,124    56,738    53,386    —   

Due to trust accounts

   4,123    4,123    —      4,123    —   

Other short-term borrowings

   1,477    1,477    —      1,477    —   

Long-term debt

   13,009    13,078    —      12,120    958 

 

   2019 
   Carrying
amount
   Estimated fair value 
   Total   Level 1   Level 2   Level 3 
   

 

(in billions of yen)

 

Financial assets:

          

Cash and due from banks, interest-bearing deposits in other banks, call loans and funds sold, and receivables under resale agreements and securities borrowing transactions

   62,012    62,012    873    61,139    —   

Investments

   1,604    1,609    1,140    469    —   

Loans, net of allowance for loan losses(Note)

   82,382    83,490    —      —      83,490 

Financial liabilities:

          

Noninterest-bearing deposits, call money and funds purchased, and payables under repurchase agreements and securities lending transactions

   44,918    44,918    24,983    19,935    —   

Interest-bearing deposits

   112,658    112,655    55,542    57,113    —   

Due to trust accounts

   312    312    —      312    —   

Other short-term borrowings

   1,995    1,995    —      1,995    —   

Long-term debt

   9,096    9,178    —      8,336    842 

Note:

Note:

Loans, net of allowance for loan losses include items measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

29. Offsetting of financial assets and financial liabilities

Derivatives

The MHFG Group enters into master netting arrangements such as International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. (“ISDA”) or similar agreements with counterparties to manage mainly credit risks associated with counterparty default. If the predetermined events including counterparty default occur, these enforceable master netting arrangements or similar agreements give the Group the right to offset derivative receivables and derivative payables and related financial collateral such as cash and securities with the same counterparty.

Repurchase and resale agreements and securities lending and borrowing transactions

Repurchase and resale agreements and securities lending and borrowing transactions are generally covered by industry standard master repurchase agreements and industry standard master securities lending agreements with netting terms to manage mainly credit risks associated with counterparty default. In the event of default by the counterparty, these agreements with netting terms provide the Group with the right to offset receivables and payables related to such transactions with the same counterparty, and to liquidate the collateral held.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The following table provides information about the offsetting of financial assets and financial liabilities at March 31, 20162018 and 2017.2019. The table includes derivatives, repurchase and resale agreements, and securities lending and borrowing transactions that are subject to enforceable master netting arrangements or similar agreements irrespective of whether or not they are offset on the Group’s consolidated balance sheets.

 

     Amounts not offset on
the balance sheet (3)
    
  Gross amounts
recognized
  Gross amounts
offset on the
balance sheet
  Net amounts
presented on the
balance sheet (2)
  Financial
instruments (4)
  Cash
collateral
  Net
amounts
 
  (in billions of yen) 

2016

      

Assets (1):

      

Derivatives

  14,130   —     14,130   (12,167  (599  1,364 

Receivables under resale agreements

  7,490   —     7,490   (7,461  —     29 

Receivables under securities borrowing transactions

  3,327   —     3,327   (3,318  —     9 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  24,947   —     24,947   (22,946  (599  1,402 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Liabilities (1):

      

Derivatives

  13,652   —     13,652   (12,043  (748  861 

Payables under repurchase agreements

  16,507   —     16,507   (16,464  —     43 

Payables under securities lending transactions

  2,538   —     2,538   (2,531  —     7 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  32,697   —     32,697   (31,038  (748  911 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

2017

      

Assets (1):

      

Derivatives

  10,608   —     10,608   (8,966  (620  1,022 

Receivables under resale agreements

  8,698   —     8,698   (8,662  —     36 

Receivables under securities borrowing transactions

  3,127   —     3,127   (3,116  —     11 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  22,433   —     22,433   (20,744  (620  1,069 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Liabilities (1):

      

Derivatives

  10,405   —     10,405   (8,866  (901  638 

Payables under repurchase agreements

  17,446   —     17,446   (17,391  —     55 

Payables under securities lending transactions

  1,458   —     1,458   (1,455  —     3 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  29,309   —     29,309   (27,712  (901  696 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

     Amounts not offset on
the balance sheet (3)
    
  Gross amounts
recognized
  Gross amounts
offset on the
balance sheet
  Net amounts
presented on the
balance sheet (2)
  Financial
instruments (4)
  Cash
collateral
  Net
amounts
 
  (in billions of yen) 

2018

      

Assets (1):

      

Derivatives

  9,341   —     9,341   (7,751  (520  1,070 

Receivables under resale agreements

  7,804   —     7,804   (7,763  —     41 

Receivables under securities borrowing transactions

  3,904   —     3,904   (3,874  —     30 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  21,049   —     21,049   (19,388  (520  1,141 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Liabilities (1):

      

Derivatives

  9,013   —     9,013   (7,758  (884  371 

Payables under repurchase agreements

  15,964   —     15,964   (15,847  —     117 

Payables under securities lending transactions

  1,181   —     1,181   (1,179  —     2 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  26,158   —     26,158   (24,784  (884  490 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

2019

      

Assets (1):

      

Derivatives

  7,403   —     7,403   (5,903  (528  972 

Receivables under resale agreements

  12,589   —     12,589   (12,579  —     10 

Receivables under securities borrowing transactions

  1,921   —     1,921   (1,894  —     27 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  21,913   —     21,913   (20,376  (528  1,009 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Liabilities (1):

      

Derivatives

  6,978   —     6,978   (5,766  (769  443 

Payables under repurchase agreements

  14,312   —     14,312   (14,309  —     3 

Payables under securities lending transactions

  932   —     932   (931  —     1 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  22,222   —     22,222   (21,006  (769  447 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

Notes:

(1)

Amounts relating to master netting arrangements or similar agreements where the MHFG Group does not have the legal right ofset-off or where uncertainty exists as to the enforceability of these agreements are excluded. For derivatives, the table includes amounts relating toover-the-counter (“OTC”) andOTC-cleared derivatives that are subject to enforceable master netting arrangements or similar agreements.

(2)

Derivative assets and liabilities are recorded in Trading account assets and Trading account liabilities, respectively.

(3)

Amounts do not exceed the net amounts presented on the balance sheet and do not include the effect of overcollateralization, where it exists.

(4)

For derivatives, amounts include derivative assets or liabilities and securities collateral that are eligible for offsetting under enforceable master netting arrangements or similar agreements.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

30. Repurchase agreements and securities lending transactions accounted for as secured borrowings

The following table shows the gross amounts of liabilities associated with repurchase agreements and securities lending transactions, by remaining contractual maturity at March 31, 20162018 and 2017:2019:

 

  Overnight and
continuous
   Up to 30 days   31-90 days   Greater than
90 days
   Total   Overnight and
continuous
   Up to 30 days   31-90 days   Greater than
90 days
   Total 
  (in billions of yen)   (in billions of yen) 

2016

  

2018

  

Repurchase agreements

   6,289    6,125    3,582    837    16,833    255    11,669    3,676    1,057    16,657 

Securities lending transactions

   1,909    700    —      236    2,845    1,270    355    —      208    1,833 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   8,198    6,825    3,582    1,073    19,678    1,525    12,024    3,676    1,265    18,490 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

2017

  

2019

  

Repurchase agreements

   249    12,700    3,897    1,124    17,970    2,596    8,537    2,403    1,104    14,640 

Securities lending transactions

   320    1,359    —      240    1,919    1,012    473    —      313    1,798 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   569    14,059    3,897    1,364    19,889    3,608    9,010    2,403    1,417    16,438 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

The following table shows the gross amounts of liabilities associated with repurchase agreements and securities lending transactions, by class of underlying collateral at March 31, 20162018 and 2017:2019:

 

   Repurchase
agreements
   Securities lending
transactions
 
   (in billions of yen) 

2016

  

Japanese government bonds and Japanese local government bonds

   532    1,891 

Foreign government bonds and foreign agency mortgage-backed securities

   15,781    700 

Commercial paper and corporate bonds

   221    27 

Equity securities

   141    185 

Other

   158    42 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total(Note)

   16,833    2,845 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

2017

  

Japanese government bonds and Japanese local government bonds

   1,127    1,152 

Foreign government bonds and foreign agency mortgage-backed securities

   15,782    375 

Commercial paper and corporate bonds

   294    47 

Equity securities

   578    320 

Other

   189    25 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total(Note)

   17,970    1,919 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

   Repurchase
agreements
   Securities lending
transactions
 
   (in billions of yen) 

2018

  

Japanese government bonds and Japanese local government bonds

   1,358    592 

Foreign government bonds and foreign agency mortgage-backed securities

   14,426    303 

Commercial paper and corporate bonds

   328    48 

Equity securities

   406    869 

Other

   139    21 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total(Note)

   16,657    1,833 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

2019

  

Japanese government bonds and Japanese local government bonds

   2,118    430 

Foreign government bonds and foreign agency mortgage-backed securities

   11,613    396 

Commercial paper and corporate bonds

   223    52 

Equity securities

   492    902 

Other

   194    18 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total(Note)

   14,640    1,798 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

Note:

Amounts exceeded the gross amounts recognized in Note 29 “Offsetting of financial assets and financial liabilities” by ¥633¥1,345 billion and ¥985¥1,194 billion, at March 31, 20162018 and 2017,2019, respectively, which excluded the amounts relating to master netting agreements or similar agreements where the MHFG Group did not have the legal right ofset-off or where uncertainty exists as to the enforceability.

The MHFG Group is required to post securities as collateral with a fair value equal to or in excess of the principal amount of the cash borrowed under repurchase agreements. For securities lending transactions, the Group receives collateral in the form of cash. These contracts involve risks, including (1) the counterparty may fail to return the securities at maturity and (2) the fair value of the securities posted may decline below the

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

amount of the Group’s obligation and therefore the counterparty may require additional amounts. The Group attempts to mitigate these risks by entering into transactions mainly with central counterparty clearing houses which revalue assets and perform margin maintenance activities on a dailyregular basis, diversifying the maturities and counterparties, and using mainly highly liquid securities.

31. Related party transactions

Transactions with directors, executive officers, and their associates

The banking subsidiaries of MHFG make loans to the MHFG Group’s directors, executive officers, and their associates in their ordinary course of business.other related parties. At March 31, 20162018 and 2017,2019, outstanding loans to such related parties were not considered significant. These related party loans were made on substantially the same terms, including interest rate and collateral, as those prevailing at the same time for comparable transactions with unrelated parties. At March 31, 20162018 and 2017,2019, there were no loans to these related parties that were considered impaired.

Other transactions, such as deposits, were entered into between MHFG’s subsidiaries and the MHFG Group’s directors, executive officers, and their associates during the fiscal years ended March 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017. The outstanding amounts of these transactions, which were made in the ordinary course of business with substantially the same terms as those for comparable transactions with unrelated parties, were not considered significant.

Transactions with other related parties

A number of transactions were entered into with other related parties, such as MHFG’s employees and affiliates accounted for under the equity method. These transactions included loans, deposits, and other banking services. They were not significant in amount and were conducted with substantially the same terms as those for comparable transactions with unrelated parties.

32. Business segment information

The MHFG Group has introduced anin-house company system based on its diverse customer segments asconsists of April 2016. The aim of this system is to leverage the Group’s strengths and competitive advantage, which is the seamless integration of the Group’s banking, trust and securities functions under a holding company structure, to speedily provide high-quality financial services that closely match customer needs.

Specifically, the company system is classified into the following fivein-house companies eachwhich are categorized based on a customer segment: the Retail & Business Banking Company, the Corporate & Institutional Company, the Global Corporate Company, the Global Markets Company, and the Asset Management Company. These customer segments are regarded as operating segments and constitute reportable segments.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

In line with the aforementioned system, the reportable segments have been changed from those based on the relevant principal consolidated subsidiaries to the fivein-house companies. The services that eachin-house company is in charge of are as follows.

Retail & Business Banking Company

This company provides financial services for individual customers, small andmedium-sized enterprises and middle market firms in Japan.

Corporate & Institutional Company

This company provides financial services for large corporations, financial institutions and public corporations in Japan.

Global Corporate Company

This company provides financial services for Japanese overseas affiliated corporate customers andnon-Japanese corporate customers, etc.customers.

Global Markets Company

This company invests in financial products with market risk, such as interest rate risk, equity risk, and credit risk.

Asset Management Company

This company develops financial products and provides financial services that match the asset management needs of its wide range of customers from individuals to institutional investors.

The reportable segment information, set forth below, is derived from the internal management reporting systems used by management to measure the performance of the Group’s operating segments. Management measures the performance of each of the operating segments in accordance with internal managerial accounting rules and practices. In addition, the format and information are presented primarily on the basis of Japanese GAAP.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Therefore, they are not consistent with the consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. A reconciliation is provided for the total amount of eachall business segment’s netsegments’ “Net business profits (losses) + Net gains (losses) related to ETFs and others” with income before income tax expense under U.S. GAAP, and the total amount of all business segments’ “Fixed assets” with the total amount of Premises andequipment-net, Goodwill, and Intangible assets reported under U.S. GAAP.

“Fixed assets” pertaining to MHBK, MHTB and MHSC have been allocated to each segment.

  MHFG (Consolidated) 

2017(4)

 Retail &
Business
Banking
Company
  Corporate &
Institutional
Company
  Global
Corporate
Company
  Global
Markets
Company
  Asset
Management
Company
  Others (3)  Total 
  (in billions of yen) 

Gross profits + Net gains (losses) related to ETFs and others(1)

  716.7   438.3   339.4   549.3   48.8   36.7   2,129.2 

General and administrative expenses

  719.3   199.9   239.2   191.2   29.3   31.4   1,410.3 

Equity in earnings (losses) of equity method investees—net

  14.9   1.0   0.9   —     0.5   1.6   18.9 

Amortization of goodwill and others

  0.4   0.4   0.4   2.3   4.0   2.7   10.2 

Others

  —     —     —     —      —     (27.7  (27.7
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net business profits (losses) (2) + Net gains (losses) related to ETFs and others

  11.9   239.0   100.7   355.8   16.0   (23.5  699.9 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

  MHFG (Consolidated) 

2018(4)

 Retail &
Business
Banking
Company
  Corporate &
Institutional
Company
  Global
Corporate
Company
  Global
Markets
Company
  Asset
Management
Company
  Others (3)  Total 
  (in billions of yen) 

Gross profits + Net gains (losses) related to ETFs and others(1)

  726.9   431.4   340.7   389.2   50.1   57.3   1,995.6 

General and administrative expenses

  724.8   202.5   250.9   201.2   27.6   37.2   1,444.2 

Equity in earnings (losses) of equity method investees—net

  12.7   1.0   2.3   —     2.9   2.6   21.5 

Amortization of goodwill and others

  0.4   0.4   0.4   2.3   8.0   2.4   13.9 

Others

  —     —     —     —      —     (21.0  (21.0
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net business profits (losses) (2) + Net gains (losses) related to ETFs and others

  14.4   229.5   91.7   185.7   17.4   (0.7  538.0 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Management does not use information on business segment’s assets to allocate resources and assess performance and has not prepared information on the segment’s assets. Accordingly, information on the segment’s assets is not available.

   MHFG (Consolidated) 

2016 (1)

  Retail &
Business
Banking
Company
  Corporate &
Institutional
Company
   Global
Corporate
Company
   Global
Markets
Company
   Asset
Management
Company
   Others (3)  Total 
   (in billions of yen) 

Gross profits

   676.4   434.9    403.8    577.7    52.1    76.7   2,221.6 

General and administrative expenses

   661.2   183.2    232.7    178.9    30.1    58.9   1,345.0 

Others

   —     —      —      —      —      (23.7  (23.7
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net business profits (losses) (2)

   15.2   251.7    171.1    398.8    22.0    (5.9  852.9 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 
   MHFG (Consolidated) 

2017

  Retail &
Business
Banking
Company
  Corporate &
Institutional
Company
   Global
Corporate
Company
   Global
Markets
Company
   Asset
Management
Company
   Others (3)  Total 
   (in billions of yen) 

Gross profits

   646.1   445.1    386.5    539.4    49.6    26.0   2,092.7 

General and administrative expenses

   678.3   186.7    237.8    200.9    29.3    87.5   1,420.5 

Others

   —     —      —      —      —      (8.8  (8.8
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net business profits (losses) (2)

   (32.2  258.4    148.7    338.5    20.3    (70.3  663.4 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 
  MHFG (Consolidated) 

2019(4)

 Retail &
Business
Banking
Company
  Corporate &
Institutional
Company
  Global
Corporate
Company
  Global
Markets
Company
  Asset
Management
Company
  Others (3)  Total 
  (in billions of yen) 

Gross profits + Net gains (losses) related to ETFs and others(1)

  707.2   473.8   416.1   192.0   49.7   (11.1  1,827.7 

General and administrative expenses

  713.7   198.2   251.8   203.3   27.3   46.3   1,440.6 

Equity in earnings (losses) of equity method investees—net

  18.1   0.9   7.3   —     1.3   23.6   51.2 

Amortization of goodwill and others

  0.4   0.4   0.4   2.3   8.0   2.1   13.6 

Others

  —     —     —     —     —     (16.3  (16.3
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net business profits (losses) (2) + Net gains (losses) related to ETFs and others

  11.2   276.1   171.2   (13.6  15.7   (52.2  408.4 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Fixed assets (5)

  499.3   225.8   176.9   92.6   0.1   662.5   1,657.2 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

Notes:

(1)Following

���Gross profits + Net gains (losses) related to ETFs and others” is reported instead of sales reported by general corporations. Gross profits is defined as the introductionsum of anin-house company system basednet interest income, fiduciary income, net fee and commission income, net trading income and net other operating income. Net gains (losses) related to ETFs and others consist of net gains (losses) on customer segments in April 2016, segment information forETFs held by MHBK and MHTB and net gains (losses) on operating investment securities of MHSC on its consolidated basis. For the fiscal yearyears ended March 31, 2016 was restated2017, 2018 and 2019, net gains related to reflect the relevant changes as transaction data on a customer segment basis had been maintained. DueETFs and others amounted to such data not being available, it is impracticable to restate segment information for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015.¥36.5 billion, ¥80.2 billion and ¥15.0 billion, respectively, of which ¥32.6 billion, ¥70.1 billion and ¥7.3 billion, respectively, are included in “Global Markets Company”.

(2)

Net business profits is used in Japan as a measure of the profitability of core banking operations, and is defined as gross profits (or the sum of net interest income, fiduciary income, net fee and commission income, net trading income and net other operating income)(as defined above) less general and administrative expenses.expenses plus equity in earnings (losses) of equity method investees—net and others. Measurement of net business profits is required for regulatory reporting to the Financial Services Agency.

(3)

“Others” includes items which should be eliminated as internal transactions between each segment on a consolidated basis.

(4)

Beginning on April 1, 2018, new allocation methods for income and expense transactions between each segment and “Others” have been applied. In connection with the use of the new allocation methods, the presentation of “Net business profits” has changed to “Net business profits (losses) + Net gains (losses) related to ETFs and others”. Before the change, “Net gains (losses) related to ETFs and others” were included in “Gross profits” of each segment and eliminated in “Others”. In addition, “Amortization of goodwill and others” has been presented as a new item. Figures for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2017 and 2018 have been restated for the new allocation methods. These changes more appropriately reflect the performance of each of the operating segments in accordance with internal managerial accounting rules and practices. Furthermore, income and expense of foreign branches of MHBK and foreign subsidiaries with functional currency other than Japanese Yen have been translated for purposes of segment reporting using the budgeted foreign currency rates. Prior period comparative amounts for these foreign currency income and expense have been translated using current period budgeted foreign currency rates.

(5)

“Fixed assets” is presented based on Japanese GAAP and corresponds to the total amount of the following U.S. GAAP accounts, Premises andequipment-net, Goodwill, and Intangible assets. The above tables do not

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Before the introduction of thein-house company system, business segment information was disclosed based on the relevant principal consolidated subsidiaries such as MHBK, MHTB, and MHSC. Segment information based on the relevant principal consolidated subsidiaries for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017 is as follows:

2015 (1)(2)

 MHBK (Consolidated)  MHTB
(Consolidated)
  MHSC
(Consolidated)
  Others  MHFG
(Consolidated)
 
    MHBK(Non-consolidated)  Others             
 Total  Total  Personal
Banking
(a)
  Retail
Banking
(b)
  Corporate
Banking

(Large
Corporations)
(c)
  Corporate
Banking
(d)
  Financial
Institutions &
Public Sector
Business
(e)
  Inter-
national
Banking
(f)
  Trading
and others
(g)
  (h)  (i)  (j)  (k)  Total 
(in billions of yen) 

Gross profits:

              

Net interest income

  1,087.3   934.9   213.4   77.6   179.5   99.6   33.3   147.1   184.4   152.4   39.4   1.8   0.9   1,129.4 

Net noninterest income

  598.4   560.6   48.7   53.7   128.0   79.8   27.4   164.9   58.1   37.8   122.6   335.8   61.5   1,118.3 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  1,685.7   1,495.5   262.1   131.3   307.5   179.4   60.7   312.0   242.5   190.2   162.0   337.6   62.4   2,247.7 

General and administrative

expenses

  904.7   833.7   233.5   118.4   94.4   76.5   30.3   92.6   188.0   71.0   94.5   268.0   54.0   1,321.2 

Others

  (43.2  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     (43.2  (3.7  —     (2.7  (49.6
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net business profits (3)

  737.8   661.8   28.6   12.9   213.1   102.9   30.4   219.4   54.5   76.0   63.8   69.6   5.7   876.9 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

2016 (2)

 MHBK (Consolidated)  MHTB
(Consolidated)
  MHSC
(Consolidated)
  Others  MHFG
(Consolidated)
 
    MHBK(Non-consolidated)  Others             
 Total  Total  Personal
Banking
(a)
  Retail
Banking
(b)
  Corporate
Banking

(Large
Corporations)
(c)
  Corporate
Banking
(d)
  Financial
Institutions &
Public Sector
Business
(e)
  Inter-
national
Banking
(f)
  Trading
and others
(g)
  (h)  (i)  (j)  (k)  Total 
(in billions of yen) 

Gross profits:

              

Net interest income

  959.4   830.1   214.8   75.7   173.0   97.5   32.5   175.5   61.1   129.3   36.1   5.4   2.8   1,003.7 

Net noninterest income

  675.3   633.7   45.0   53.1   143.7   77.5   31.8   185.1   97.5   41.6   130.7   343.8   68.1   1,217.9 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  1,634.7   1,463.8   259.8   128.8   316.7   175.0   64.3   360.6   158.6   170.9   166.8   349.2   70.9   2,221.6 

General and administrative

expenses

  903.3   833.3   234.4   118.6   91.9   75.2   29.8   122.1   161.3   70.0   99.1   279.3   63.3   1,345.0 

Others

  (22.1  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     (22.1  (4.2  —     2.5   (23.8
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net business profits (losses) (3)

  709.3   630.5   25.4   10.2   224.8   99.8   34.5   238.5   (2.7  78.8   63.5   69.9   10.1   852.8 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

2017 (2)(4)

  MHBK
(Consolidated)
  MHTB
(Consolidated)
  MHSC
(Consolidated)
  Others   MHFG
(Consolidated)
 
     MHBK
(Non-consolidated)
   Others              
  Total  (a)-(g)
Total
   (h)  (i)  (j)  (k)   Total 
   (in billions of yen) 

Gross profits:

          

Net interest income (expense)

   836.5   719.8    116.7   30.2   (1.5  2.6    867.8 

Net noninterest income

   686.7   600.6    86.1   121.8   333.1   83.3    1,224.9 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   1,523.2   1,320.4    202.8   152.0   331.6   85.9    2,092.7 

General and administrative

expenses

   982.7   866.6    116.1   101.6   257.5   78.7    1,420.5 

Others

   (8.7  —      (8.7  (5.2  0.1   5.0    (8.8
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net business profits (3)

   531.8   453.8    78.0   45.2   74.2   12.2    663.4 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Notes:

(1)Beginning on April 1, 2015, new allocation methods have been appliedinclude other asset amounts because “Fixed assets” is the only balance sheet metric that management uses when evaluating and making decisions pertaining to the calculation of “Gross profits” and “General and administrative expenses” for reportable segments of MHBK. Figures foroperating segments. “Fixed assets” has been allocated to each segment starting in the fiscal year ended March 31, 20152019 to enhance management’s analysis of the Group’s operations. “Others” in “Fixed assets” includes assets of headquarters that have not been allocated to each segment, “Fixed assets” pertaining to consolidated subsidiaries that are not subject to allocation, consolidating adjustments, and others. Certain “Fixed assets” expenses have been restated for the new allocation methods.
(2)“Others (h)” and “Others (k)” include the elimination of transactions between consolidated subsidiaries.
(3)Net business profits is used in Japan as a measure of the profitability of core banking operations, and is defined as gross profits (or the sum of net interest income, fiduciary income, net fee and commission income, net trading income and net other operating income) less general and administrative expenses. Measurement of net business profits is required for regulatory reportingallocated to the Financial Services Agency.in-house company segments using a reasonable allocation criteria.
(4)Segment information based on the relevant principal consolidated subsidiaries for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 is presented for comparability purposes. Due to system limitations, it is impracticable to present the details of MHBK(Non-consolidated).

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Reconciliation

As explained above, the measurement bases of the internal management reporting systems and the income and expenses items included are different from the accompanying consolidated statements of income. Therefore, it is impracticable to present reconciliations of all the business segment’s information, other than net business profits, to the corresponding items in the accompanying consolidated statements of income. A reconciliation of total net“Net business profits under the internal management reporting systems(losses) + Net gains (losses) related to ETFs and others” for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2015, 20162017, 2018 and 20172019 presented above to income before income tax expense shown on the consolidated statements of income isand a reconciliation of “Fixed assets” for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019 to the total amount of Premises andequipment-net, Goodwill, and Intangible assets are as follows:

 

   2015  2016  2017 
   (in billions of yen) 

Net business profits

   876.9   852.8   663.4 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

U.S. GAAP adjustments

   230.8   201.3   (387.8

(Provision) credit for loan losses

   60.2   (34.6  (37.7

Net gains (losses) related to equity investments

   160.1   188.4   259.6 

Non-recurring personnel expense

   (8.0  (3.9  (8.8

Gains on disposal of premises and equipment

   2.8   10.2   5.6 

(Provision) credit for losses onoff-balance-sheet instruments

   2.8   16.4   (19.5

Others—net

   (57.9  (34.0  5.6 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income before income tax expense

   1,267.7   1,196.6   480.4 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   2017  2018  2019 
   (in billions of yen) 

Net business profits (losses) + Net gains (losses) related to ETFs and others

   699.9   538.0   408.4 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Adjustment to reconcile management reporting to Japanese GAAP:

    

General and administrative expenses (non-recurring losses)

   (46.7  (30.9  23.3 

Expenses related to portfolio problems (including reversal of (provision for) general reserve for losses on loans)

   (80.2  (17.0  (30.7

Gains on reversal of reserves for possible losses on loans, and others

   32.7   173.3   11.2 

Net gains (losses) related to stocks - Net gains (losses) related to ETFs and others

   205.7   191.9   259.9 

Net extraordinary gains (losses)

   46.7   17.5   (497.9

Others

   (73.9  (72.8  (57.9
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income before income tax expense under Japanese GAAP

   784.2   800.0   116.3 

Adjustment to reconcile Japanese GAAP to U.S. GAAP:

    

Derivative financial instruments and hedging activities

   (221.9  (110.2  45.3 

Investments

   (115.9  98.1   (273.3

Loans

   2.5   (2.4  (11.9

Allowances for loan losses and off-balance-sheet instruments

   (13.8  6.8   (5.8

Premises and equipment

   28.6   35.4   303.6 

Land revaluation

   4.5   3.4   10.2 

Business combinations

   14.8   15.6   (12.8

Pension liabilities

   33.8   (4.4  (32.2

Consolidation of variable interest entities

   1.6   2.7   (39.0

Foreign currency translation

   (6.2  12.1   1.7 

Others

   (31.8  (17.8  (17.0
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income before income tax expense under U.S. GAAP

   480.4   839.3   85.1 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

2019
(in billions of yen)

Fixed assets

1,657.2

U.S. GAAP adjustments

413.1

Premises and equipment-net, Goodwill, and Intangible assets

2,070.3

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Note:

The U.S. GAAP adjustments are primarily comprised of GAAP differences mainly from internally developed software, which was impaired under Japanese GAAP; land, which was revalued under Japanese GAAP; and the consolidation of certain variable interest entities, which are not consolidated under Japanese GAAP.

33. Foreign activities

The following table presents consolidated income statement and total assets information by major geographic area. Foreign activities are defined as business transactions that involve customers residing outside of Japan. However, as the MHFG Group’s operations are highly integrated globally, estimates and assumptions have been made for an allocation among the geographic areas.

 

      Americas                 Americas             
  Japan   United
States of
America
   Others   Europe   Asia/Oceania
excluding
Japan,

and others
   Total   Japan United
States of
America
   Others   Europe   Asia/Oceania
excluding
Japan,

and others
   Total 
  (in billions of yen) 

Fiscal year ended March 31, 2015:

            

Total revenue(1)

   2,396.9    324.1    102.4    211.8    223.7    3,258.9 

Total expenses(2)

   1,459.9    210.8    24.3    133.8    162.4    1,991.2 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Income before income tax expense

   937.0    113.3    78.1    78.0    61.3    1,267.7 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Net income

   565.6    79.7    76.2    74.3    34.4    830.2 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total assets at end of fiscal year

   127,468.2    31,074.9    4,871.0    10,880.6    15,819.7    190,114.4 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Fiscal year ended March 31, 2016:

            

Total revenue(1)

   2,288.5    434.4    45.7    187.5    428.0    3,384.1 

Total expenses(2)

   1,534.2    282.6    28.7    126.2    215.8    2,187.5 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Income before income tax expense

   754.3    151.8    17.0    61.3    212.2    1,196.6 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Net income

   464.7    136.9    15.4    51.1    182.0    850.1 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total assets at end of fiscal year

   133,157.1    28,985.3    4,227.5    11,616.9    15,823.4    193,810.2 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

(in billions of yen)

 

Fiscal year ended March 31, 2017:

                       

Total revenue(1)

   1,748.3    500.3    70.3    190.7    367.5    2,877.1    1,748.3  500.3    70.3    190.7    367.5    2,877.1 

Total expenses(2)

   1,712.3    303.2    29.1    136.2    215.9    2,396.7    1,712.3  303.2    29.1    136.2    215.9    2,396.7 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Income before income tax expense

   36.0    197.1    41.2    54.5    151.6    480.4    36.0  197.1    41.2    54.5    151.6    480.4 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Net income

   5.7    167.6    38.8    39.5    137.5    389.1    5.7  167.6    38.8    39.5    137.5    389.1 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total assets at end of fiscal year

   138,832.3    30,262.0    4,203.3    10,629.1    16,529.6    200,456.3    138,832.3  30,262.0    4,203.3    10,629.1    16,529.6    200,456.3 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Fiscal year ended March 31, 2018:

           

Total revenue(1)

   2,002.4  654.9    64.0    197.4    447.8    3,366.5 

Total expenses(2)

   1,582.5  478.8    38.5    172.6    254.8    2,527.2 
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Income before income tax expense

   419.9  176.1    25.5    24.8    193.0    839.3 
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Net income

   231.3  152.7    23.7    21.3    172.7    601.7 
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total assets at end of fiscal year

   142,587.8  28,135.9    4,380.4    11,677.8    17,473.7    204,255.6 
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Fiscal year ended March 31, 2019:

           

Total revenue(1)

   1,705.5  792.1    66.0    249.7    616.5    3,429.8 

Total expenses(2)

   2,082.6  696.5    46.1    203.2    316.3    3,344.7 
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Income before income tax expense

   (377.1 95.6    19.9    46.5    300.2    85.1 
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Net income

   (331.4 85.3    17.0    34.6    270.2    75.7 
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total assets at end of fiscal year

   133,443.5  25,913.5    4,824.7    15,322.5    18,107.0    197,611.2 
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

Notes:

(1)

Total revenue is comprised of Interest and dividend income and Noninterest income.

(2)

Total expenses are comprised of Interest expense, Provision (credit) for loan losses and Noninterest expenses.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

34. Mizuho Financial Group, Inc., parent company

The following tables present the parent company only financial information of MHFG:

Condensed balance sheets

 

  2016   2017   2018   2019 
  (in millions of yen)   

 

(in millions of yen)

 

Assets:

        

Cash and due from banks

   137    15,912    22,264    99,209 

Interest-bearing deposits in other banks

   16,305    4,278    1,227    1,158 

Trading account assets

   176,593    —   

Investments in subsidiaries and affiliated companies

   8,840,003    8,993,388    9,501,633    9,317,387 

Long-term loans receivable from subsidiaries

   624,518    2,697,250    3,969,015    5,110,248 

Other

   400,590    477,375    344,065    351,951 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   9,881,553    12,188,203    14,014,797    14,879,953 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Liabilities and shareholders’ equity:

        

Short-term borrowings

   1,186,345    1,156,100    1,083,135    945,505 

Long-term debt

   584,518    2,632,250    3,969,015    5,145,286 

Other liabilities

   96,139    138,496    94,226    62,643 

Shareholders’ equity

   8,014,551    8,261,357    8,868,421    8,726,519 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   9,881,553    12,188,203    14,014,797    14,879,953 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Condensed statements of income

 

  2015   2016   2017   2017   2018   2019 
  (in millions of yen)   

 

(in millions of yen)

 

Income:

            

Dividends from subsidiaries and affiliated companies:

            

Banking subsidiaries

   316,035    272,070    300,530       300,530         227,057    267,724 

Non-banking subsidiaries and affiliated companies

   28,633    20,814    27,618    27,618    28,987    23,392 

Management fees from subsidiaries

   32,163    39,267    48,594    48,594    47,945    39,292 

Interest Income on Loans and Discounts

   799    9,630    39,359 

Interest income on loans and discounts

   39,359    68,869    106,920 

Other income

   37,308    1,855    21,054    21,054    52,672    9,575 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   414,938    343,636    437,155    437,155    425,530    446,903 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Expenses:

            

Operating expenses

   26,855    31,063    38,927    38,927    38,661    40,680 

Interest expense

   8,937    11,914    38,759    48,594    74,227    110,861 

Bond issuance cost

   865    3,230    9,835 

Other expense

   1,828    5,973    7,708    14,608    28,123    59,049 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   38,485    52,180    95,229    102,129    141,011    210,590 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Equity in undistributed net income of subsidiaries

   427,037    559,553    21,251 

Equity in undistributed net income (loss) of subsidiaries

   32,595    309,210    (173,142
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Income before income tax expense

   803,490    851,009    363,177    367,621    593,729    63,171 

Income tax expense

   442    517    737 

Income tax expense (benefit)

   5,181    16,121    (21,300
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Net income

   803,048    850,492    362,440    362,440    577,608    84,471 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Condensed statements of cash flows

 

  2015 2016 2017   2017 2018 2019 
  (in millions of yen)   

 

(in millions of yen)

 

Cash flows from operating activities:

        

Net income

   803,048  850,492  362,440    362,440  577,608  84,471 

Adjustments and other

   (460,230 (546,946 (40,595   (40,595 (302,109 197,193 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

   342,818  303,546  321,845    321,845  275,499  281,664 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities:

        

Proceeds from sales of Equity securities

   —     —    139,719 

Net change in loans

   (150,000 (479,948 (2,022,860   (2,022,860 (1,344,323 (1,075,059

Purchases of premises and equipment

   (159,670 (165 (40,362   (40,362 (6,649 (11,640

Payments for purchases of securities of subsidiaries

   —    (2,249 (65,269   (65,269  —     —   

Proceeds from withdrawal of securities of subsidiaries

   —     —    13,359    13,359   —     —   

Net change in other investing activities

   3,294  1,872  6,691    (5,336 (4,114 (1,310
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

   (306,376 (480,490 (2,108,441   (2,120,468 (1,355,086 (948,290
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities:

        

Net change in short-term borrowings

   130,000  (10,000 (30,000   (30,000 (70,000 (140,000

Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt

   150,000  479,948  2,022,860    2,022,860     1,344,323  1,075,059 

Repayment of long-term debt

   (141,200 (98,800 —   

Proceeds from issuance of common stock

   6  5  6    6  3  3 

Purchases of treasury stock

   (12 (13 (1,435   (1,435 (1,611 (2,124

Dividends paid

   (176,186 (195,283 (190,031   (190,031 (190,382 (190,413

Net change in other financing activities

   1,006  1,001  971    971  555  437 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

   (36,386 176,858  1,802,371 

Net cash provided by financing activities

   1,802,371  1,082,888  742,962 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and due from banks

   56  (86 15,775 

Cash and due from banks at beginning of fiscal year

   167  223  137 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

   —     —    540 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Cash and due from banks at end of fiscal year

   223  137  15,912 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

   3,748  3,301  76,876 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

   16,442  20,190  23,491 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

   20,190  23,491  100,367 
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

35. Subsequent events

SignatureRedemption of preferred securities

On June 30, 2019, preferred securities, issued by the MHFG Group’s overseas special purpose company, were redeemed in full. The registrant hereby certifies that it meets allspecial purpose company is not consolidated in accordance with ASC 810 since the Group is not the primary beneficiary. Thus, the redemption of preferred securities did not reduce Noncontrolling interests in consolidated subsidiaries, but reduced Long-term debt in the Group’s consolidated balance sheets. The following table describes the details of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.redeemed preferred securities:

 

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

By:Issuer

  

    /s/ Yasuhiro Sato

Aggregate
redemption amount
Reason for the redemption
Name: Yasuhiro Sato(in millions)
Title:  President & CEO

Mizuho Capital Investment (JPY) 3 Limited

Series A ¥249,500Arrival of optional redemption date

Mizuho Capital Investment (JPY) 3 Limited

Series B ¥53,500Arrival of optional redemption date

July 7, 2017


EXHIBIT INDEX

 

Exhibit

Number

  

Description of Exhibits

1.1  Articles of Incorporation of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc., dated June 23, 2017 (English Translation)**
1.2  Regulations of the Board of Directors of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc., as amended on April 1, 201726, 2019 (English Translation)
1.3  Share Handling Regulations of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc., dated June 23, 2017April 1, 2018 (English Translation)*
2.1  Form of American Depositary Receipt*
2.2  Form of Deposit Agreement, amended and restated as of April  2, 2018, among the registrant, The Bank of New York Mellon (formerly The Bank of New York) as Depositary and all owners and holders from time to time of American Depositary Receipts issued thereunder*
8  List of significant subsidiaries of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.—see “Item 4.C. Information on the Company—Organizational Structure.”
11  Code of Ethics for Financial Professionals of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (English Translation)***
12.1  CEO Certification required by Rule13a-14(a) (17 CFR240.13a-14(a)).
12.2  CFO Certification required by Rule13a-14(a) (17 CFR240.13a-14(a)).
13.1  Certification required by Rule13a-14(b) (17 CFR240.13a-14(b)) and Section  1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350).
15  Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
101.INS  XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
101.CAL  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
101.DEF  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
101.LAB  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
101.PRE  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase

 

*

Incorporated by reference to our annual report on Form20-F (No.001-33098) filed on July 23, 2015.3, 2018.

**

Incorporated by reference to our annual report on Form20-F (No.001-33098) filed on July 7, 2017.

***

Incorporated by reference to our annual report on Form20-F (No.001-33098) filed on July 21, 2016.


Signature

The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.

MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

By:

    /s/ Tatsufumi Sakai

Name: Tatsufumi Sakai

Title:  President & Group CEO

July 5, 2019