TABLE OF CONTENTS

i

In this report, references to “Navios Logistics,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Navios South American Logistics Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, as the context may require. We are incorporated as a Republic of the Marshall Islands corporation. References to “Navios Holdings” are to Navios Maritime Holdings Inc., a Republic of the Marshall Islands corporation. Navios Holdings is, along with its subsidiaries, our controlling stockholder. References to “Navios Shipmanagement” are to Navios Shipmanagement Inc., a Republic of the Marshall Islands corporation.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND RISK FACTOR SUMMARY

Certain statements under the captions “Item 3.D Risk Factors”, “Item 4 Information on the Company” and “Item 5 Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” and elsewhere in this report relating to our business and financial outlook (including our statements concerning plans and objectives of management for future operations or economic performance, or assumptions related thereto) constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 relating to our business and financial outlook.1995. These forward-looking statements are not historical facts, but rather are based on our current expectations, estimates and projections about our industry, and our beliefs and assumptions. Such statements include, in particular, statements about the strength of world economies, fluctuations in currencies and interest rates, general market conditions, including fluctuations in vessel contract rates, changes in demand for the transportation or storage of grain and mineral commodities and petroleum products, the development of our relationshipplanned Port Murtinho Terminal and Nueva Palmira Free Zone port terminal facilities, our relationships with Navios Holdings and Navios Shipmanagement, the financial condition of each of Navios Holdings, Navios Shipmanagement and their respective affiliates, our ability to enter into innovative financing, changes in our operating expenses, including, drydocking and insurance costs, andas well as costs related to changes in governmental rules and regulations or actions taken by regulatory authorities, political, economic and other issues specifically affecting South America, and related government regulations, potential liability from pending or future litigation, general domestic and international political conditions, potential disruption of river or seaborne transportation due to accidents or political events, outbreaks and effects of highly contagious diseases or viruses, such as the novel coronavirus disease (“COVID-19”) or others, the success of pilot contracts or new business opportunities with our customers and other statements described in this report. In some cases, you can identify the forward-looking statements by the use of words such as “may,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “forecast,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “propose,” “potential,” “continue” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology.

We caution readers of this annual report on Form 20-F not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect our view only as of the date of this report. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and other factors, some of which are beyond our control, are difficult to predict and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or forecasted in the forward-looking statements. We caution you not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect our view only as of the date of this report. We are not obliged to update these statements or publicly release the result of any revisions to them to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this report or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. New factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all of these factors. Further, we cannot assess the impact of each such factor on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to be materially different from those contained in these forward-looking statements.

Forward-looking statementsThese risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, such matters as:

as the following risks, uncertainties and other factors:

We are not obliged to update these statements or publicly release the result of any revisions to them to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this report or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. New factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all of these factors. Further, we cannot assess the impact of each such factor on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to be materially different from those contained in these forward-looking statements.

You should read this report completely and with the understanding that actual future results may be materially different from expectations. All forward-looking statements made in this report are qualified by these cautionary statements. These forward-looking statements are made only as of the date of this report, and we do not undertake any obligation, other than as may be required by law, to update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect changes in assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events, changes in future operating results over time or otherwise.

PART I

Item 1. Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers

Not Applicable.

Item 2. Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable

Not Applicable.

Item 3. Key Information

A. Selected Financial Data

The selected consolidated historical financial information as ofFor all periods up to and including the year ended December 31, 20172019, we previously filed with the Securities and 2016Exchange Commission (“SEC”) our financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The Company has transitioned its financial reporting from U.S. GAAP to IFRS from the year ended December 31, 2020, onwards, as described in its 6-K furnished to the SEC on April 15, 2021. Accordingly, the Company has prepared consolidated financial statements that comply with IFRS applicable as at December 31, 2019, together with the comparative data for the year ended December 31, 2018 and for the year ended December 31, 2017.

The summary consolidated statement of (loss)/income and cash flows data for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2021, 2020 and 2015,2019 and the summary consolidated financial position data as of December 31, 2021 and 2020 are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements which areAudited Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this report. The selectedsummary consolidated historicalstatement of income and cash flows data for the year ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the summary consolidated financial informationposition data as of December 31, 2015, 20142019, 2018 and 2013 and for the years ended December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 have been2017 is derived from our audited consolidated financial statements not included in this report. This information is qualified by reference to, and should be read in conjunction with, “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” and our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this report.

accounting principles generally accepted in the United States IFRS or as a measure of profitability or liquidity. While EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA isare frequently used as a measure of operating performance, the definitiondefinitions of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA used here may not be comparable to that used by other companies due to differences in methods of calculation.

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Reconciliation to Net Income/(Loss)/Profit Attributable to Navios Logistics’ Stockholders

B. Capitalization and Indebtedness

Not applicable.

C. Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds

Not applicable.

D. Risk Factors

You should carefully consider all of the information included in this report and the risks described below when evaluating our business and prospects. If any of the following risks actually occurs, our business, results of operations, financial condition or cash flows could be materially adversely affected. In that case, you might lose all or partFor a summary of your investment.these risks and uncertainties, see “Forward-Looking Statements and Risk Factor Summary.” In evaluating our business, you should alsoplease refer to the other information set forth in this report, including “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” and our consolidated financial statements and the related notes included herein.

Risks Relating to Our Industry and Our Business

•

The international transportation industry is generally cyclical and volatile, and this may lead to volatility in, and reductions of, our vessel contract rates and volatility in our results of operations.

•

Our grain port business has seasonal components linked to the grain harvests in the region. At times throughout the year, the capacity of our grain port terminal (the “Grain Port Terminal”), including the loading and unloading operations, and potential unavailability of space in our silos, which could materially and adversely affect our operations and revenues.

•

We are subject to certain operating risks in our Liquid Port Terminal and the Dry Port Terminals (collectively the “Port Terminals”) that could affect the performance of our contractual commitments, and in our barge and cabotage businesses including vessel breakdowns or accidents that could result in a loss of revenue from the affected vessels, which could result in a loss of revenue and could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.

•

We derive a significant part of our revenues from a small number of customers, and the loss of one or more of these customers could materially and adversely affect our revenues.

•

Vale’s payments represent a significant portion of our revenue and if Vale were unable or unwilling to fulfill their obligations under the in-force agreements with us, it could significantly reduce our revenues and cash flow.

•

When our contracts expire, we may not be able to replace them.

Risks Relating to Environmental Matters

Risks Relating to the Countries in which we Operate

Risks Relating to Argentina

Risks Relating to Uruguayan Free Zone Regulation

Other Risks Relating to the Countries in which We Operate

Risks Relating to Our Indebtedness

Risks Relating to Our Organizational Structure

General Risks

Risks Relating to Our Industry and Our Business

The international transportation industry is generally cyclical and volatile, and this may lead to volatility in, and reductions of, our vessel contract rates and volatility in our results of operations.

The international transportation industry is generally both cyclical and volatile, with frequent fluctuations in contract rates. The markets in which we operate are still developing and the nature of the industry’s cycle with respect to rates is difficult to determine, including the timing and amount of fluctuations in contract rates and spot market rates. However, weWe expect that our industry will exhibit significant cyclicality and volatility as it matures. The contract rates earned by the tankers in our cabotage businessCabotage Business and barges and pushboats in our barge

businessBarge Business will depend in part upon the state of the tankers, bargescoastal and pushboats marketriver markets at the time we seek to charter them. We cannot control the forces affecting the supply and demand for these vessels or for the goods that they carry or predict the state of the respective markets on any future date.

Some of the factors that influence the demand for vessels include, but are not limited to:

Some of the factors that influence the supply of vessels include, but are not limited to:

Further, public health or safety concerns and governmental restrictions - including those caused by outbreaks of pandemic diseases such as the COVID-19 global pandemic, that cause us or our customers to suspend operations in affected areas, may impact both demand for, and supply of, our vessels in some of the countries in which we operate, or cause an economic downturn adversely affecting demand for our services.

Our grain port business has seasonal components linked to the grain harvests in the region. At times throughout the year, the capacity of our grain port terminal (the “Grain Port Terminal”), including the loading and unloading operations, as well as theand potential unavailability of space in our silos, is exceeded, which could materially and adversely affect our operations and revenues.

A significant portionWe conduct much of our grain port business in a region of navigable waters in South America on the Parana, Paraguay and Uruguay Rivers and part of the River Plate, which flow through Brazil, Bolivia, Uruguay, Paraguay and Argentina covering the entire length of the Parana River south of the Itaipu Dam, the entire length of the Paraguay River south of Corumba, the Uruguay River and the River Plate west of Buenos Aires (the “Hidrovia Region”). The revenue from our grain port business is derived from the handling and storage of soybeans and other agricultural products produced in the Hidrovia Region, which occurs mainly during the season between April and September. This seasonal effectThe seasonality of our grain port business operations could in turn, increase the inflow and outflow of barges and vessels in our dry port and cause theGrain Port Terminal, causing decreased space in our silos, to be exceeded, which in turn would affect our timely operations or our ability to satisfy the increased demand. Inability to provide services in a timely manner may have a negative impact on our clients’ satisfaction and result in loss of existing contracts or inability to obtain new contracts.

We are subject to certain operating risks in our Port Terminals that could affect the performance of our contractual commitments, and in our barge and cabotage business including vessel breakdowns or accidents, thatwhich could result in a loss of revenue from the affected vessels, which could result in turna loss of revenue and could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.

Our exposure to operating risks of vessel breakdown and accidents mainly arises in the context of our owned or bareboat chartered and operated vessels, including barges, tankers and pushboats. If any of the vessels in our fleet suffers damage, it may need to be repaired at a drydocking facility. The costs of drydocking are unpredictable and can be substantial. The loss of earnings while these vessels, barges and pushboats are being repaired and repositioned, as well as the actual cost of these repairs, could decrease our revenues and earnings substantially, particularly if a number of vessels, barges and pushboats are damaged or drydocked at the same time. For the fleet which is or may bechartered-in under time charters most operating risks relating to these time chartered vessels remain with their owners. If we pay hire on achartered-in vessel or barge at a lower rate than the rate of hire it receives from asub-charterer to whom we have chartered out the vessel, a breakdown or loss of the vessel

due to an operating risk suffered by the owner will, in all likelihood, result in our loss of the positive spread between the two rates of hire. Breakdowns, accidents or drydocking costs involving our vessels and losses relating to chartered vessels that are not covered by insurance would result in a loss of revenue from the affected vessels, which may materially adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

We are subject to certain operating risks in our port terminals that could affect the performance of our contractual commitments which could result in a loss of revenue, and which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.

Our operations are subject to a number of risks affecting our Port Terminals and the port facilities.facilities under development. These risks include, but are not limited to, mechanical and electrical failure, accidents, personal injury, loss or theft of cargo, or damage, fires, explosions, business interruption, political conditions and hostilities, labor strikes, adverse weather conditions such as floods, natural disasters, accidents on waterways or in coastal routes or accidents in our loading or unloading terminals, including environmental accidents and collisions, each of which could potentially result in damages, penalties, fines, indemnities or costs payable to third parties and other claims against us. Further, public health or safety concerns and governmental restrictions, including those caused by outbreaks of pandemic disease such as the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, may cause us to suspend operations in affected areas. Our exposure to these operating risks in our existing port terminalsfacilities may adversely affect our capacity to duly perform our contractual obligations under ourtake-or-pay contracts. TheIn addition, these operating risks may result in additional repair costs of repairingfor equipment, including but not limited to cranes, conveyor belts, stacker-reclaimer, shiploaders, or piers, which are unpredictable and can be substantial. The loss of earnings while these damages are being repaired, as well as the actual cost of these repairs, could decrease our revenues and earnings substantially, particularly if this leads to a default under our contracts, which would materially affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Our exposure to operating risks of vessel breakdown and accidents mainly arises in the context of our owned or bareboat chartered and operated vessels, including barges, tankers and pushboats. If any of the vessels in our fleet suffers damage, it may need to be repaired at a dry-docking facility. The costs of dry-docking are unpredictable and can be substantial. The loss of earnings while these vessels, barges and pushboats are being repaired and repositioned, as well as the actual cost of these repairs, could decrease our revenues and earnings substantially, particularly if a number of vessels, barges and pushboats are damaged or dry-docked at the same time. Most of the operating risks relating to vessels that we charter-in remain with their owners. If we charter-in a vessel or barge at a lower rate than the rate of hire we receive from a sub-charterer of such vessel, a breakdown or loss of the vessel due to an operating risk suffered by the owner will, in all likelihood, result in our loss of the positive spread between the two rates of hire. Breakdowns, accidents or dry-docking costs of our vessels and losses relating to chartered vessels that are not covered by insurance would result in a loss of revenue which may materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

We depend onderive a few significant customers for a large part of our revenues from a small number of customers, and the loss of one or more of these customers could materially and adversely affect our revenues.

In each of our businesses, we derive a significant part of our revenues from a small number of customers. We expect that a small number of customers will continue to generate a substantial portion of our revenues forin the foreseeable future. For the year ended December 31, 2017,2021, our three largest customers, Vale International S.A. (“Vale”), YPF and Y.P.F. S.A. (“YPF”) and Axion Energy Argentina S.A. (“Axion Energy”)(YPF), accounted for 20.3%, 13.7%23.4% and 12.7%10.1% of our revenues, respectively, and our five largest customers accounted for approximately 61.9%53.6% of our revenues, with no such customer (other than Vale and YPF) accounting for greater than 10% of our revenues. For the year ended December 31, 2016,2020, our three largest customers,customer, Vale, Axion Energy and Cammesa S.A. (“Cammesa”), accounted for 28.0%, 13.8% and 11.5%31.8% of our revenues, respectively, and our five largest customers accounted for approximately 67.4%58.7% of our revenues, with no such customer (other than Vale) accounting for greater than 10% of our revenues. For the year ended December 31, 2015,2019, our two largest customers,customer, Vale, and Cammesa, accounted for 27.8% and 12.9%36.4% of our revenues, respectively, and our five largest customers accounted for approximately 61.7%64.0% of our revenues, with no such customer (other than Vale) accounting for greater than 10% of our revenues. In addition, some of our customers, including many of our most significant customers, operate their own vessels and/or barges as well as port terminals. Theseterminals and these customers may decide to cease or reduce the use of our services for various reasons, including employment ofutilizing their own vessels and/or port terminals as applicable.terminals. The loss of any of our significant customers, including our largetake-or-pay customers, or the change of the contractual terms of any one of our most significanttake-or-pay contracts, or any significant dispute with one of these customers could materially and adversely affect our financial condition and our results of operations.

If one or more of our customers does not perform under one or more contracts with us and we are not able to find a replacement contract, or if a customer exercises certain rights to terminate the contract, we could suffer a loss of revenues that could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We could lose a customer or the benefits of a contract if, among other things:

The loss of any of our customers or a decline in payments under our contracts, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition, as well as our cash flows, or our ability to continue to service our indebtedness.

We could also become involved in legal disputes with customers relating to our contracts, including but not limited to our long-termtake-or pay customers, relating to our contracts, be it through litigation, arbitration or otherwise, which could lead to delays in, or suspension or termination of ourtake-or-pay contracts or others and result in time-consuming, disruptive and expensive litigation or arbitration. If such contracts are suspended for an extended period of time, or if a number of our material contracts are terminated or renegotiated, our financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. Even if we prevail in legal disputes relating to our customer contracts, which could entitle us to compensation, we cannot assure youprovide any assurance that we would receive such compensation on a timely basis or in an amount that would fully compensate us for our losses.

Vale’s payments represent a significant portion of our revenue and if Vale were unable or unwilling to fulfill their obligations under the in-force agreements with us, it could significantly reduce our revenues and cash flow.

Vale’s payments, including in connection with the Vale port contract, to us represented approximately 23.4%, 31.8% and 36.4% of our revenue for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Reductions in the demand for or the oversupply of iron ore would place Vale under financial pressure and may increase the likelihood of Vale being unable or unwilling to pay us contracted rates or renew contracts upon termination.

If Vale were to terminate or not renew the Vale port contract, we may be unable to enter into new contracts under similarly favorable terms or at all.

In addition, the ability and willingness of Vale to perform its obligations under its port contract with us will depend upon a number of factors that are beyond our control and may include, among other things, general conditions of the Brazilian economy, general international economic conditions, the state of the capital markets, the condition of the commodities industry and charter hire rates. Should Vale fail to honor its obligations under the agreement with us, we could sustain significant losses, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition, as well as our cash flows. Notwithstanding the foregoing, our contract has dispute resolution clauses and protections that we may seek to enforce in such events. For example, on March 30,June 10, 2016, we received written notice from Vale stating that Vale will not be performing the service contract entered into between Corporacion Navios S.A. and Vale on September 27, 2013, relating to the iron ore port facility in Nueva Palmira, Uruguay. The Company initiated arbitration proceedings in London on June 10, 2016against Vale pursuant to the dispute resolution provisions of the serviceVale port contract. On December 20, 2016, a Londonthe arbitration tribunal ruled that the Vale port contract remains in full force and effect. Ifeffect, and if Vale were to further repudiate or renounce the contract, we may elect to terminate the contract and then would be entitled to damages calculated by reference to guaranteed volumes and agreed tariffs for the remaining period of the contract.

We are subject to certain credit risks with respect to our counterparties on contracts, As of the date hereof, no further claim has been made or received from Vale. Any litigation or arbitration proceeding would be costly and time consuming and may result in the failure of such counterparties to meet their obligations could cause us to suffer losses on such contracts and thereby decrease revenues and income.

Wecharter-out our fleet, provide handling services for commodities and rent the spacedeterioration of our tanks, stockpiles and silos to other parties, who pay us hire on a daily rate or rate per ton or per cubic meter stored or moved. We also enter into spot market voyage contracts, for which we are paid a rate per ton to carry a specified cargo on a specified route. If the counterparties fail to meet their obligations, we could suffer losses on such contracts which could materially adversely affect our financial condition and resultscommercial relationships with Vale.

When our contracts expire, we may not be able to successfully replace them.

The process for concluding contracts for our services, including port logistics services, vessel contracts and longer-term time charters generally involves a lengthy and intensive screening and vetting process and the submission of competitive bids. In addition to the quality and suitability of our ports and fleet, medium- and longer-term contracts tend to be awarded based upon a variety of other factors relating to the operator, including but not limited to:

As a result of these factors, when our contracts, including our long-term port contracts and charters, expire, we cannot assure youprovide any assurance that we will be able to successfully replace them promptly or at all or at rates sufficient to allow us to operate our business profitably or to meet our obligations, including payment of debt service to our noteholders or lenders. Our ability to renew the contracts on our current or future vessels by the time of their expiration or termination, and the rates payable under any replacement contracts, will depend upon, among other things, economic conditions in the sectors in which our vessels operate at that time, changes in the supply and demand for vessel capacity and changes in the supply and demand for the transportation and storage of commodities as described above.

However, if we are successful in employing our vessels under longer-term contracts, our vessels will not be available for trading in the spot market during an upturn in the market cycle, when spot trading may be more profitable. If we cannot successfully employ our vessels with profitable contracts, our results of operations and operating cash flow could be materially and adversely affected.

Our industry is highly competitive, and we may not be able to compete successfully for services with new companies with greater resources.

We provide services through our ports and employ our fleet in highly competitive markets. The river and sea coastal logistics market is international in scope and we compete with many different companies, including other port or vessel owners and major oil companies.

With respect to loading, storage and ancillary services, the market is divided between transits and exports, depending on the cargo origin. In the case of transits there are other companies operating in the river system that are able to offer services similar to ours. With respect to exports, our competitors are Montevideo Port in Montevideo, Ontur and TGU in Nueva Palmira. The main competitor of our Liquid Port Terminal in Paraguay is Petropar, a Paraguayan state-owned entity (“Petropar”). Other competitors include Copetrol S.A. (“Copetrol”), TLP Chartering (“TLP”), Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. (“Petrobras”), Trafigura Pte. Ltd. (“Trafigura”) and Monte Alegre S.A. (“Monte Alegre”).

We face competition in our Barge and Cabotage Businesses from other shipowners and from vessel operators. The charter markets in which our vessels compete are highly competitive. Key competitors include Atria Logistica S.A., Hidrovias do Brasil, Interbarge, P&O and Fluviomar. In addition, some of our customers, including ADM, Cargill, Louis Dreyfus and Vale, have some of their own dedicated barge capacity, which they can use to transport cargo in lieu of hiring a third party. We also compete indirectly with other forms of land-based transportation such as truck and rail. These companies and other smaller entities are regular competitors of ours in our primary trading areas. Competition is primarily based on prevailing market contract rates, vessel location and vessel manager know-how, reputation and credibility.

Our competitors may be able to offer their customers lower prices, higher quality service and greater name recognition than we do. Accordingly, we may be unable to retain our current customers or to attract new customers.

Our business can be affected by adverse weather conditions, effects of climate change, public health concerns and other factors beyond our control, thatwhich can affect production of the goods we transport and store as well as the navigability of the river system on which we operate.

A significant portion of the revenue from our grain port business is derived from the transportation, handling and storage of iron ore, soybeans and other agricultural products produced in the Hidrovia region.Region. Any drought or other adverse weather conditions, such as floods, could result in a decline in production of these products, which would likely result in a reduction in demand for our services. This would,A reduction in turn, negativelydemand could have a negative impact on our results of operations and financial condition. Furthermore, our fleet operates in the Parana and Paraguay Rivers, and any changes adversely affecting navigability of either of these rivers, such as changes in the depth of the water or the width of the navigable channel, could, in the short-term, reduce or limit our ability to effectively transport cargo effectively on the rivers. The possible effects of climate change, such as floods, low river water levels, droughts or increased storm activity, could similarly affect the demand for our services or our operations. Further, the impact of COVID-19 on global markets is expected to be severe and could affect our operations, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects.

A prolonged drought, the possible effects of climate change, widespread or prolonged public health concerns including those relating to the pandemic outbreak COVID-19 or other turnturns of events that isare perceived by the market to have an impact on the region, the navigability of the Parana or Paraguay Rivers or our business in general may, in the short-term, result in a reduction in the market value of our ports, barges and pushboats that operatepushboats. For example, in 2021 and 2020, throughput of our Grain Port Terminal decreased by 24.6% and 27.3%, respectively, compared to 2019 as a result of lower Uruguayan exports due to reduced Uruguayan soybean production and lower transshipment of grains from Paraguay and Bolivia due to difficult navigation conditions because of a prolonged period of unusually warm weather and a drought in southern Brazil, Paraguay and northern Argentina which resulted in water levels in the region.Paraná River dropping to their lowest levels in decades. Such difficult conditions adversely affected our Barge Business through 2021, as barges have limited capacity in reduced drafts and trips take longer to be completed, which increases voyage expenses. These barges and pushboats are designed to operate in wide and relatively calm rivers, of which there are only a few in the world. If it becomes difficult or impossible to operate profitably our barges and pushboats in the Hidrovia Region and we are forced to sell them to a third party located outside of the region, there is a limited market in which we would be able to sell these vessels, and accordingly we may be forced to sell them at a substantial loss.

We may be unable to obtain financing for our growth or to fund our future capital expenditures, which could materially adversely affect our resultsloss, if at all. See “Item 5A. Operating Results—Overview—Factors Affecting Our Results of operations and financial condition.

Our capital expenditures during 2015, 2016 and 2017 were $27.0 million, $91.2 million and $46.5 million, respectively, used to acquire and/or pay installments for among others one bunker vessel, one newbuilding estuary tanker vessel, six pushboats, 72 newbuilding barges and to expand our port terminal operations through the construction of an iron ore port terminal facility. In order to follow our current strategy for growth, we will need to fund future asset or business acquisitions, increase working capital levels and increase capital expenditures.

In the future, we will also need to make capital expenditures required to maintain our current ports, fleet and infrastructure. Cash generated from our earnings may not be sufficient to fund all of these measures. Accordingly, we may need to raise capital through borrowings or the sale of debt or equity securities. Our ability to obtain bank financing or to access the capital markets for future offerings may be limited by our financial condition at the time of any such financing or offering, as well as by adverse market conditions resulting from, among other things, general economic conditions and contingencies and uncertainties that are beyond our control. If we fail to obtain the funds necessary for capital expenditures required to maintain our ports, fleet and infrastructure, we may be forced to take vessels out of service or curtail operations, which could materially harm our revenues and profitability. If we fail to obtain the funds that might be necessary to acquire new vessels, expand our existing infrastructure, or increase our working capital or capital expenditures, we might not be able to grow our business and our earnings could suffer. Furthermore, despite covenants under the indenture governing the 7.25% Senior Notes due 2022 (the “2022 Senior Notes”) and the Term Loan B Facility (See “Item 5.B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Long-term Debt Obligations”) and the agreements governing our other indebtedness, we will be permitted to incur additional indebtedness which would limit cash available for working capital and to service our indebtedness.Operations—Weather Conditions.”

For any newbuilding vessels we purchase, delays,Delays, cancellations ornon-completion of deliveries of suchpurchased vessels, including second-hand and newbuilding vessels could harmhave an adverse effect on our operating results.

For any newbuilding vessels we purchase including the tanker vessel currently under construction, the shipbuilder could fail to deliver the newbuilding vessel as agreed or we could cancel the purchase contract if the shipbuilder fails to meet its obligations. In addition, under charters or contracts we may enter into that are related to a newbuilding, if our delivery of the newbuilding to our customer is delayed, the customer may terminate the contract and, in addition to the resulting loss of revenues, we may be responsible for additional, substantial liquidated damages. We do not derive any revenue from a vessel until after its delivery and are required to pay substantial sums as progress payments during construction of a newbuilding. While we have refund guarantees from financial institutions with respect to such progress payments innewbuilding or for the purchase of a secondhand vessel. In the event the vessel is not delivered by the shipyard or the seller is otherwise not accepted by us, there iswe will not derive the potential thatrevenues from such ship as we had planned and we may not be ablefully compensated under the construction agreement (and the related guarantees) with respect to collect all portions of such refund guarantees,progress payments, or deposits paid to sellers, in which case we would lose the amounts we have advanced the seller or to the shipyards for such progress payments. In addition, if we enter into charterparties or contracts with our clients related to purchased vessels, if a shipbuilder or a seller fails to deliver the vessel as agreed, we may breach our obligations under such agreements with our customers. If we are in breach of those contracts, our customers may terminate them and, in addition to the resulting loss of revenues, we may be responsible for additional, substantial liquidated damages.

The completion and delivery of newbuildings could be delayed, cancelled or otherwise not completed because of:

If delivery of a vessel is materially delayed, it could materially adversely affectcancelled or otherwise not completed, our future earnings.

Spare parts or other key equipment needed for the operation of our ports and fleet may not be available off the shelf and we may face substantial delays, which could result in a loss of revenues while waiting for those spare parts to be produced and delivered to us.

Our ports and our fleet may need spare parts to be provided in order to replace old or damaged parts in the normal course of their operations. Given the increased activity in the maritime industry and the industry that supplies it, the manufacturers of key equipment for our vessels and our ports (such as engine makers, propulsion systems makers, control system makers and others) may not have the spare parts needed available immediately (or off the shelf) and may have to produce them when required. If this was the case, our vessels and our ports may be unable to operate while waiting for such spare parts to be produced, delivered, installed and tested, resulting in a substantial loss of revenues for us.

We own and operate anup-river port terminal in San Antonio, Paraguay that we believe is well-positioned to become a hub for industrial development based upon the depth of the river in the area and the convergence between land and river transportation. If the port does not become a hub for industrial development, our future prospects could be materially and adversely affected.

We own and operate anup-river port terminal with tank storage for refined petroleum products, oil and gas in San Antonio, Paraguay. We believe that the port’s location south of the city of Asuncion, the depth of the river in the area and the convergence between land and river transportation make this port well-positioned to become a hub for industrial development. However, if the location is not deemed to be advantageous, or the use of the river or its convergence with the land is not fully utilized for transportation, then the port would not become a hub for industrial development, and our future prospectsearnings could be materially and adversely affected.

TheWe face risks and costs associated with operation of ports as well asand vessels, which risks and costs increase as the operational port equipment and vessels age.

The costs to operate and maintain a port or a vessel increase with the age of the port equipment or the vessel. Governmental regulations, safety or other equipment standards related to the age of the operational port equipment or vessels may require expenditures for alterations or the addition of new equipment to our port equipment or vessels and may restrict the type of activities in which these ports or vessels may engage. The failure to make capital expenditures to alter or add new equipment to our barges, pushboats, vessels and/or vesselsports may restrict the type of activities in which these barges, and pushboats, and vessels and/or ports may engage and may decrease their operational efficiency and increase our costs. Given the increased activity in the maritime industry and the industry that supplies it, the manufacturers of key equipment for our vessels and ports (such as engine makers, propulsion systems makers, control systems makers and others) may not have the spare parts needed available immediately (oroff-the-shelf) and may have to produce them when required. If this was the case, our vessels and ports may be unable to operate while waiting for such spare parts to be produced, delivered, installed and tested, resulting in substantial loss of revenues for us.

As charterers prefer newer vessels that are more fuel efficient than older vessels, the age of some of our vessels, barges and pushboats may make them less attractive to charterers. Cargo insurance rates also increase with the age of a vessel, making older vessels less desirable to charterers as well. The ages and rates at which risks and costs associated with vessels increase are dependent on numerous, complex factors and may vary substantially from vessel to vessel. Such factors include the condition of the vessel, the nature of the use of the vessel (including whether the vessel is used in fresh water, in which vessels typically have a longer a useful life, or salt water), whether various additional life-extending investments have been made in the vessel, any prior owner maintenance and operating practices, the nature of cargoes that could be carried, and the possibility that such vessels could be used in ports and docks, which could increase the wear on the vessel.

We cannot assure youprovide any assurance that as our operational port equipment and vessels barges and pushboats age, market conditions will justify those expenditures or enable us to operate them profitably during the remainder of their useful lives. If we sell such assets, we may have to sell them at a loss, or opt to scrap our assets, and if clients no longer use our ports orcharter-out our vessels due to their age, our results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

We are subject to various laws, regulations and conventions, relating to environmental, health and safety that could require significant expenditures both to maintain compliance with such laws and to pay for any uninsured environmental liabilities resulting from a spillSpare parts or other environmental disaster.

Our business is materially affected by government regulation to protect the environment, health and safety in the form of international conventions, national, state and local laws, customs inspections and related procedures, and regulations in force in the jurisdictions in which our ports are located and our fleet operates, as well as in the country or countries of their registration. Because such conventions, laws and regulations are often revised, we cannot predict the ultimate cost of complying with such conventions, laws and regulations, or the impact thereof on the fair market price or useful life of our vessels, or onkey equipment needed for the operation of our ports. Changesports and fleet may not be available off the shelf and we may face substantial delays in governmental regulations, safetysecuring necessary parts or otherequipment. Failure to obtain necessary spare parts or key equipment standards, as well as compliance with standards imposed by inland self-regulatory organizationsin a timely manner could result in a loss of revenue.

Our ports and customer requirements or competition,our fleet may require us to make capital and other expenditures. Inneed spare parts in order to satisfy any such requirements, we may be required to take onereplace old or more of our vessels out of service for extended periods of time, with corresponding losses of revenues. Indamaged parts in the future, market conditions may not justify these expenditures or enable us to operate our vessels, particularly older vessels, profitably during the remaindernormal course of their economic lives, which could have a material adverse effect on our resultsoperations. Given the increased activity in the maritime industry and the manufacturing industry that supplies it, the manufacturers of operations. This could lead to significant asset write-downs. For example, the recentphase-out of single-hulled vessels require us to either replace, modify or shift the utilization of some of our single-hulled vessels.

Additional conventions, laws and regulations may be adopted that could limit our ability to do business, require capital expenditures or otherwise increase our cost of doing business, which may materially and adversely affect our operations, as well as the shipping industry generally. In various jurisdictions, legislation has been enacted or is under consideration that would impose more stringent requirements on air pollution and other ship emissions, including emissions of greenhouse gases and ballast water discharged from vessels. We are required by various governmental and quasi-governmental agencies to obtain certain permits, licenses and certificates with respect to our operations. Violations of such requirements can result in substantial penalties, and in certain instances, seizure or detention of our vessels.

We believe that the heightened level of environmental and quality concerns among insurance underwriters, regulators and customers is leading to greater inspection and safety requirements on all vessels and may accelerate the scrapping of older vessels throughout the industry. Increasing environmental and safety concerns have created a demandkey equipment for vessels that conform to higher environmental and safety standards. We are required to maintain operating standards for all of our vessels for operational safety, quality maintenance, continuous training of our officers and crews, and compliance with international, national and local laws and regulations. We believe that our vessels and operations areour ports (such as engine makers, propulsion systems makers, control system makers and others) may not have the spare parts we require immediately available. In such circumstances, we may require a manufacturer to custom-produce equipment for us. In this case, our vessels and our ports may be unable to operate while waiting for such spare parts to be produced, delivered, installed and tested, resulting in a substantial compliance with applicable environmentalloss of revenues for us.

Our failure to receive required approvals for or timely complete construction and safety laws, regulations and standards. However, because such laws and regulations are frequently changing and may impose increasingly stricter requirementscommence full operation or be enforced more strictly, future requirements may limit our ability to do business, increase our operating costs, force the early retirementsecure satisfactory commercial contracts of our vessels, and/or affect their resale value, all of whichnew planned Port Murtinho Terminal and Nueva Palmira Free Zone port terminal facilities could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. There is also a risk that anynon-compliance that may be found to exist could lead to penalties or fines, that these could be imposed regardless of fault or intent, and that they could materially adverselynegatively affect our financial position.

In addition, various internationalbusiness operations, and domestic laws have been adopted that impose liability to pay damages or compensation for environmental loss or other damage resulting from ship operations, notably through pollution by oil or other hazardous or noxious substances. Relevant international laws include the International Convention for Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage (the “CLC”) (which imposes liability for pollution damage caused by the escape or discharge of persistent oil from a tanker), and the International Convention on Civil Liability for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage 2001 (which applies to oil pollution damage from the bunkers of vessels other than tankers falling within CLC). Domestic legislation also exists that imposes similar liabilities in respect of pollution damage, notably in respect of incidents falling outside these international regimes. We could also become subject to personal injury or property or natural resources damage claims relating to exposure to, or

releases of, regulated materials associated with our current or historic operations. In addition, we are subject to insurance or other financial assurance requirements relating to oil spills and other pollution incidents and are in material compliance with these requirements.

We maintain, for each of our owned vessels, insurance coverage against pollution liability risks in the amount of $1.0 billion per event. The insured risks include penalties and fines as well as civil liabilities and expenses resulting from accidental pollution. However, this insurance coverage is subject to exclusions, deductibles and other terms and conditions. If any liabilities or expenses fall within an exclusion from coverage, or if damages from a catastrophic incident exceed the $1.0 billion limitation of coverage per incident, our cash flow, profitability and financial position could be materially and adversely impacted.

For a more detailed discussion regarding the details of these international and domestic laws, please see “Item 4.B. Business Overview.”

As we expand our business, we may haveexperience difficulty managing our growth including the need to improveas we expand our operations and financial systems, staff and crew or to receive required approvals to implement our expansion projects. If we cannot improve these systems, recruit suitable employees or obtain required approvals, we may not be able to effectively control our operations.business.

We intend to grow ourare currently developing a multipurpose upriver port terminal bargein Port Murtinho in the State of Mato Grosso do Sul (the “Port Murtinho Terminal”), in the center-west region of Brazil, for exports of agricultural commodities and cabotage businesses, either throughimports of fertilizers and fuel products. Since 2018, we have purchased a total of approximately 9.0 hectares of undeveloped land, acquisition and expansion of our port facilities, through purchases of additional vessels, throughchartered-in vessels or acquisitions of other logistics and related or complementary businesses. The expansion and acquisition ofincluding river-front located in Port Murtinho, on which we expect to construct the new land or addition of vessels to our fleet will impose significant additional responsibilities on our management and staff, and may require us to increase the number of our personnel.terminal. We will also have to increase our customer base to provide continued activitydeveloped a master plan for the new businesses.terminal and concluded the licensing process for construction. As of the date of this report, we expect to complete construction of the new terminal in 2023. The new terminal is still in the early stages of development, and there can be no assurance that it will be constructed.

We also have 144 acres available to be developed inside or near the Nueva Palmira Free Zone in Uruguay. In addition, approvalpart of governmental, regulatory and other authorities may be needed to implement any acquisitions or expansions. For example, we havethis available land, we plan to develop a new terminal for liquid products. The new liquid terminal will service the market for the storage and transshipment of fuel products for export from the Paraguay and Parana Rivers from Puerto Caceres (Brazil) to Nueva Palmira (Uruguay) (the “Hidrovia Waterway”) and the sale of fuel products within Nueva Palmira Free Zone for bunkering operations of vessels and push boats. Before commencement of operations of the new liquid terminal, we intend to start liquid operations in the area by selling liquid products within the Nueva Palmira Free Zone for bunkering operations of vessels and pushboats, which does not require any change in Uruguay as well as nearlocal regulation. There can be no assurance that we will obtain all necessary authorizations and permits, or that the Free Zonenew liquid terminal in Nueva Palmira will be constructed.

The available land in Brazil and Uruguay where we plan to expand our port facilitydevelop the new terminals, requires authorizations and construct a port terminal for liquid cargo. Inpermits from several governmental authorities in order to complete these projects, however, we need to receive required authorization from several authorities.do so. If these authorities deny our request for authorization, or if existing authorizations are revoked, we will not be able to proceed with construction.

If we fail to secure commercial agreements with prospective clients to our satisfaction, we may decide to delay or not proceed with these projects.

Growing any business by acquisition presents numerous risks. Acquisitions expose us to the risk of successor liability relating to actions involving an acquired company, its management or contingent liabilities incurred before the acquisition. The due diligence we conduct in connection with an acquisition, and any contractual guarantees or indemnitiesinvestments. Further, there can be no assurance that we receive fromwill complete the sellersexpected development of acquired companiesthe new terminals or assets,complete construction of the new terminals as scheduled or without cost overrun. Even if construction is completed on a timely basis, there can be no assurance that full operation of the new terminals will commence as expected. In addition, we may not be able to attract a sufficient number of skilled workers to protect us from,meet the needs of the new terminals. If we experience delays in construction or compensate us for, actual liabilities. Any material liability associated with an acquisition could adversely affectcommencement of the full operations, increased costs or lack of skilled labor or other unforeseen events, our reputationbusiness, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and reduce the benefits of the acquisition. Other risks presented include difficulty in obtaining additional qualified personnel, managing relationships with customers and suppliers and integrating newly acquired assets or operations into existing infrastructures.adversely affected.

Management is unable to predict whether or when any prospective acquisition will occur, or the likelihood of a certain transaction being completed on favorable terms and conditions. Our ability to expand our business through acquisitions depends on many factors, including our ability to identify acquisitions or access capital markets at an acceptable cost and negotiate favorable transaction terms. We cannot give any assurance that we will be successful in executing our growth plans or that we will not incur significant expenses and losses in connection therewith or that our acquisitions will perform as expected, which could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. Furthermore, because the volume of cargo we ship is at or near the capacity of our existing barges during the typical peak harvest season, our ability to increase volumes shipped is limited by our ability to acquire orcharter-in additional barges.

With respect to our existing infrastructure, our initial operating and financial systems may not be adequate as we implement our plan to expand, and our attempts to improve these systems may be ineffective. If we are unable to operate our financial and operations systems effectively or to recruit suitable employees as we expand our operations, we may be unable to effectively control and manage the substantially larger operation. Although it is impossible to predict what errors might occur as the result of inadequate controls, it is generally harder to manage a larger operation than a smaller one and, accordingly, more likely that errors will occur as operations grow. Additional management infrastructure and systems will be required in connection with such growth to attempt to avoid such errors.

Rising crew costs, fuel prices and other cost increases may adversely affect our profits.

At December 31, 2017,2021, we employed 395409 land-based employees and 597626 seafarers as crew on our vessels. Crew costs are a significant expense for us. Recently, the limited supply of and increased demand for well-qualified crew, due to the increase in the size of the global shipping fleet, has created upward pressure on crewing costs, which we generally bear under our time and spot contracts. Additionally, labor union activity in the Hidrovia Region may create pressure for us to pay higher crew salaries and wages. In addition, fuel is one of the largest operatingvoyage expenses in our bargeBarge and cabotage businesses,Cabotage Businesses, when the revenue is contracted mainly by ton per cargo shipped. The prices for and availability of fuel may be subject to rapid change or curtailment, respectively, due to, among other things, new laws or regulations, interruptions in production by suppliers, imposition of restrictions on energy supply by government,governments, worldwide price levels and market conditions. Currently, most of our long-term contracts provide for the adjustment of freight rates based on changes in the fuel prices and crew costs. We may be unable to include similar provisions in these contracts when they are renewed or in future contracts with new customers. To the extent our contracts do not pass-through changes in fuel prices to our clients, we will be forced to bear the cost of fuel price increases. We may hedge in the futures market all or part of our exposure to fuel price variations. We cannot assure youprovide any assurance that we will be successful in hedging our exposure. In the event of a default by our contractual counterparties or other circumstance affecting their performance under a contract, we may be subject to exposure under, and may incur losses in connection with, our hedging instruments, if any. In certain jurisdictions, the price of fuel is affected by high local taxes and may become more expensive than prevailing international prices. We may not be able to pass onto our customers the additional cost of such taxes and may suffer losses as a consequence of such inability. Such increases in crew and fuel costs may materially and adversely affect our results of operations.

Disruptions in world financial markets and the resulting governmental action in Europe, the United States and in other parts of the world could have a material adverse impact on our ability to obtain financing required to acquire vessels or new businesses. Furthermore, such a disruption would materially adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

Global financial markets and economic conditions have been severely disrupted and volatile in recent years and remain subject to significant vulnerabilities, such as the deterioration of fiscal balances and the rapid accumulation of public debt, continued deleveraging in the banking sector and a limited supply of credit. Continuing turmoil and hostilities in Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Ukraine, other current conflicts, the refugee crisis in Europe and Middle East and continuing concerns relating to the European sovereign debt crisis have led to increased volatility in global credit and equity markets. Several European countries including Greece, have been affected by increasing public debt burdens and weakening economic growth prospects. In recent years, Standard and Poor’s Rating Services and Moody’s Investors Service (“Moody’s”) downgraded the long-term ratings of most European countries’ sovereign debt and initiated negative outlooks. Such downgrades could negatively affect those countries’ ability to access the public debt markets at reasonable rates or at all, materially affecting the financial conditions of banks in those countries, including those with which we maintain cash deposits and equivalents, or on which we rely on to finance our vessel and new business acquisitions. Cash deposits and cash equivalents in excess of amounts covered by government-provided insurance are exposed to loss in the event ofnon-performance by financial institutions. We maintain cash deposits and equivalents in excess of government-provided insurance limits at banks in certain European countries, which may expose us to a loss of cash deposits or cash equivalents.

The credit markets worldwide and in the United States have experienced significant contraction,de-leveraging and reduced liquidity, and the U.S. federal government, state governments and foreign governments took highly significant measures in response to such events, including the enactment of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 in the United States, and may implement other significant responses in the future. Securities and futures markets and the credit markets are subject to comprehensive statutes, regulations and other requirements. The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), other regulators, self-regulatory organizations and exchanges are authorized to take extraordinary actions in the event of market emergencies, and may effect changes in law or interpretations of existing laws. Any changes to securities, tax, environmental, or other laws or regulations, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows, and could cause the value of our securities to decline.

Recently, a number of financial institutions have experienced serious financial difficulties and, in some cases, have entered bankruptcy proceedings or are in regulatory enforcement actions. These difficulties resulted, in part, from declining markets for assets held by such institutions, particularly the reduction in the value of their mortgage and asset-backed securities portfolios. These difficulties were compounded by financial turmoil affecting the world’s debt, credit and capital markets, and the general decline in the willingness by banks and other financial institutions to extend credit, particularly to the shipping industry due to the historically low vessel earnings and values, and, in part, due to changes in overall banking regulations (for example, Basel III). As a result, the ability of banks and credit institutions to finance new projects, including the acquisition of new vessels in the future, were for a time uncertain. Following the stress tests run by the European Central Bank (the “ECB”), revised capital ratios have been communicated to European banks. This has reduced the uncertainty following the difficulties of the past several years, but it has also led to changes in each bank’s lending policies and ability to provide financing or refinancing. A recurrence of global economic weakness may adversely affect the financial institutions that provide our credit facilities and may impair their ability to continue to perform under their financing obligations to us, which could have an impact on our ability to fund current and future obligations.

Furthermore, we may experience difficulties obtaining financing commitments, including commitments to refinance our existing debt as payments come due under our credit facilities, in the future if lenders are unwilling to extend financing to us or unable to meet their funding obligations due to their own liquidity, capital or solvency issues. Due to the fact that we would possibly cover all or a portion of the cost of any new acquisition with debt financing, such uncertainty, combined with restrictions imposed by our current debt, could hamper our ability to finance vessels or other assets and new business acquisitions. In addition, the economic uncertainty worldwide has made demand for shipping services volatile and has reduced charter rates, which may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. Currently, the economies of the United States, the European Union (the “EU”), China, Japan, other Asian Pacific countries and India are the main driving force behind the development in seaborne transportation. Reduced demand from such economies has in the past driven decreased rates and vessel values.

We could face risks attendant to changes in economic environments, changes in interest rates, and instability in certain securities markets, among other factors. Major market disruptions and the uncertainty in market conditions and the regulatory climate in the U.S., Europe and worldwide could adversely affect our business or impair our ability to borrow amounts under any future financial arrangements. The current market conditions may last longer than we anticipate. These recent and developing economic and governmental factors could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

Our industry is highly competitive, and we may not be able to compete successfully for services with new companies with greater resources.

We provide services through our ports and employ our fleet in highly competitive markets. The river and sea coastal logistics market is international in scope and we compete with many different companies, including other port or vessel owners and major oil companies.

With respect to loading, storage and ancillary services, the market is divided between transits and exports, depending on the cargo origin. In the case of transits there are other companies operating in the river system that are able to offer services similar to ours. With respect to exports, our competitors are Montevideo Port in Montevideo and Ontur and TGU in Nueva Palmira. The main competitor of our liquid port terminal in Paraguay is Petropar, a Paraguayan state-owned entity. Other competitors include Copetrol, TLP, Petrobras and Trafigura Pte Ltd.

We face competition in our barge and cabotage businesses with transportation of oil and refined petroleum products from other independent ship owners and from vessel operators. The charter markets in which our vessels compete are highly competitive. Key competitors include the successor of Ultrapetrol Bahamas Ltd., Hidrovias do Brasil, Interbarge, P&O, Imperial Shipping and Fluviomar. In addition, some of our customers, including ADM, Cargill International S.A. (“Cargill”), Louis Dreyfus Holding B.V. (“Louis Dreyfus”) and Vale, have some of their own dedicated barge capacity, which they can use to transport cargo in lieu of hiring a third party. We also compete indirectly with other forms of land-based transportation such as truck and rail. These companies and other smaller entities are regular competitors of ours in our primary trading areas. Competition is primarily based on prevailing market contract rates, vessel location and vessel managerknow-how, reputation and credibility.

Our competitors may be able to offer their customers lower prices, higher quality service and greater name recognition than we do. Accordingly, we may be unable to retain our current customers or to attract new customers.

If we fail to fulfill the oil majors’ vetting processes, itsuch failure could materially and adversely affect the employment of our tanker vessels in the spot and period markets, and consequently our results of operations.

WhileThe oil majors consider numerous factors are consideredin evaluating commercial decisions, and, evaluated prior to a commercial decision, the oil majors, through their association, OCIMF, have developed and are implementing two basic tools: (a) the Ship Inspection Report Program (“SIRE”) and (b) the Tanker Management and Self Assessment (“TMSA”) program. The former is a ship inspection based upon a thorough Vessel Inspection Questionnaire and performed by OCIMF-accredited inspectors, resulting in a report being logged on SIRE. The report is an important element of the ship evaluation undertaken by any oil major when a commercial need exists.

Based upon commercial needs, there are three levels of assessment used by the oil majors: (a) terminal use, which will clear a vessel to call at one of the oil major’s terminals, (b) voyage charter, which will clear the vessel for a single voyage and (c) term charter, which will clear the vessel for use for an extended period of time. While for terminal use and voyage charter relationships, a ship inspection and the operator’s TMSA will be sufficient for the evaluation to be undertaken, a term charter relationship also requires a thorough office audit. An operator’s request for such an audit is by no means a guarantee one will be performed; it will take a long record of proven excellent safety and environmental protection on the operator’s part as well as high commercial interest on the part of the oil major to have an office audit performed. If we fail to clear the vetting processes of the oil majors, it could have a material adverse effect on the employment of our vessels, and, consequently, on our results of operations.

A failure to pass inspection by classification societies could result in one or more vessels being unemployable unless and until they pass inspection, resulting in a loss of revenues from such vessels for that period and a corresponding decrease in operating cash flows.

The hull and machinery of every commercial vessel with certain characteristics must be classed by a classification society that is authorized and is customarily a member of the International Association of Classification Societies Ltd. (“IACS”). The classification society must certify that a vessel has been built and maintained in accordance with the rules of such organization and complies with the applicable rules and regulations of the country whose flag such vessel flies and the international conventions of which that country is

a member. The classification society certifies that a vessel is safe and seaworthy in accordance with the applicable rules and regulations of the country of registry of the vessel and with international conventions such as the United Nations Safety of Life at Sea Convention (“SOLAS”). Most of our owned andchartered-infleet is currently enrolled with Lloyd’s Register of Shipping and RINA (Italian Naval Register).

Vessels, pushboats and barges must undergo an annual survey, an intermediate survey and a special survey. For oceangoingcertain vessels, in lieu of a special survey, a vessel’s machinery may be on a continuous survey cycle, under which the machinery and/or its hull would be surveyed periodically over a five-year period. Certain of our vessels are on continuous survey cycles for machinery inspection. Every oceangoing vessel isCertain vessels are also required to be drydocked every two to three years on intermediate survey and every five years on special survey, while pushboats are required to be drydocked every six years on special survey for inspection of the underwater parts of such vessel and every three years for a floating intermediate survey and barges are required to be drydocked up to every eight years on special survey for inspection of the underwater parts of such vessel and every two years for a floating intermediate survey.

If any vessel fails any annual survey, intermediate survey or special survey, the vessel may be unable to trade between ports and, therefore, would be unemployable, potentially causing a material adverse effect on our revenues due to the loss of revenues from such vessel until it was able to trade again.

Our vessels could be subject to seizure through maritime arrest or government requisition.

Crew members, suppliers of goods and services to a vessel, barge or pushboat, shippers of cargo, and other parties may be entitled to a maritime lien against a vessel for unsatisfied debts, claims or damages. In many jurisdictions, a maritime lien holder may enforce its lien by arresting the vessel or, under the “sister ship” theory of liability followed in some jurisdictions, arrest the vessel that is subject to the claimant’s maritime lien or any other vessel owned or controlled by the same owner. In addition, a government could seize ownership of one of our vessels or take control of a vessel and effectively become her charterer at charter rates dictated by the government. Generally, such requisitions occur during a period of war or emergency. The maritime arrest, government requisition or any other seizure of one or more of our vessels could interrupt our operations, reducing related revenue and earnings, and may require us to pay very large sums of money to have the arrest lifted.

The smuggling of drugs or other contraband onto our vessels may lead to governmental claims against us.

Our vessels operate in South America where smugglers may attempt to hide drugs and other contraband on vessels, with or without the knowledge of crew members. Under some jurisdictions, vessels used for the conveyance of illegal drugs in vessels could subject thethese vessels to forfeiture to the government of such jurisdiction. To the extent our vessels are found with contraband, whether inside or attached to the hull of our vessel and whether with or without the knowledge of any of our crew, we may face governmental or other regulatory claims, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.

We may employ our fleet on the spot market and thus expose ourselves to risk of losses based on short-term decreases in shipping rates.

We periodically employ some of our fleet on a spot basis. As of December 31, 2017, 58% of our cabotage fleet and 34% of our barge fleet on a dwt tons basis was employed under time charter or COA contracts. The remaining percentage of our barge fleet and cabotage fleet were employed in the spot market. The spot charter market can be competitive and freight rates within this market may be volatile with the timing and amount of fluctuations in spot rates being difficult to determine. Longer-term contracts provide income atpre-determined rates over more extended periods of time. The cycles in our target markets have not yet been clearly determined but we expect them to exhibit significant volatility as the South American markets mature. We cannot assure youprovide any assurance that we will be successful in keeping our fleet fully employed in these short-term markets, or that future spot

rates will be sufficient to enable such fleet to be operated profitably, as spot rates may decline below the operating cost of vessels. A significant decrease in spot market rates or our inability to fully employ our fleet by taking advantage of the spot market would result in a reduction of the incremental revenue received from spot chartering and could materially and adversely affect our results of operations, and operating cash flow.

Because the fair market values of vessels may fluctuate significantly, we may incur losses when we sell our vessels.

Vessel values have historically been highly volatile. The market value of our vessels may fluctuate significantly in the future, and we may incur losses when we sell vessels, which would adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. Some of the factors that affect the fair market value of vessels, all of which are beyond our control, are:

Our industry has inherent operational risks that our insurance may not be adequately covered by our insurance.cover.

The operation of vessels in international and regional trade is inherently risky. Although we carry insurance for our fleet covering risks commonly insured against by vessel owners and operators, such as hull and machinery insurance, war risks insurance and protection and indemnity insurance,Not all risks may not be adequately insured against and any particular claim may not be paid and any indemnification paid due to the occurrence of a casualty covered by our policies may not be sufficient to entirely compensate us for the damages suffered. We do not currently maintain loss of hire, credit risk or defense insurance, which would cover the loss of revenue if any of our contracts were terminated prior to their expiration, and our legal costs to recover related damages. We also do not maintainoff-hire insurance, which would cover the loss of revenue during extended vesseloff-hire periods, such as those that occur during an unscheduled drydocking due to damage to the vessel from accidents. Furthermore, we do not maintain strike insurance, which would protect us from loss of revenue due to labor disruptions, except at our dry and wet port terminals. Accordingly, any extended vesseloff-hire, due to an accident, labor disruption or other reason, could have a material adverse effect on our business. Any claims covered by insurance would be subject to deductibles, and since it is possible thatdeductibles. As a result, if we file a large number of insurance claims, may be brought, the aggregate amount of these deductibles could be material.

We may be unable to procure adequate insurance coverage for our fleet or port terminals at commercially reasonable rates in the future. For example, more stringent environmental regulations have led in the past to increased costs for, and in the future may result in the lack of availability of, insurance against risks of environmental damage or pollution. A catastrophic oil spill or marine disaster could exceed our insurance coverage, which could harm our business, financial condition and operating results. Changes in the insurance markets attributable to terrorist attacks may also make certain types of insurance more difficult for us to obtain. In addition, the insurance that may be available to us in the future may be significantly more expensive than our existing coverage.

Even if our insurance coverage is adequate to cover our losses, weWe may not be able to timely obtain a replacement vesselvessels or other assetassets in the event of a loss. Furthermore, in the future, we may not be able to obtain adequate insurance coverage at reasonable rates for our fleet and port terminals. Our insurance policies also contain deductibles, limitations and exclusions, which can result in significant increased overall costs to us.

Because we obtain some of our insurance through protection and indemnity associations, we may also be subject to calls, or premiums, in amounts based not only on our own claim records, but also on the claim records of all other members of the protection and indemnity associations.

We may be subject to calls, or premiums, in amounts based not only on our claim records but also on the claim records of all other members of the protection and indemnity associations through which we receive insurance coverage for tort liability, including pollution-related liability. Our payment of these calls could result in significant expenses to us, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition and our indebtedness.

Risks Relating to Environmental Matters

We are subject to various laws, regulations, and international conventions, particularly environmental and safety laws, that could require significant expenditures both to maintain compliance with such laws and to pay for any uninsured environmental liabilities, including any resulting from a spill or other environmental incident, which could affect our cash flows and profit.

Vessel owners and operators are subject to government regulation in the form of international conventions, and national, state, and local laws and regulations in the jurisdictions in which their vessels operate, in international waters, as well as in the country or countries where their vessels are registered. Such laws and regulations include those governing the management and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes, the cleanup of oil spills and other contamination, air emissions, discharges of operational and other wastes into the water, and ballast water management. In particular, ballast water management requirements will likely result in compliance costs relating to the installation of equipment on our vessels to treat ballast water before it is discharged and other additional ballast water management and reporting requirements. Investments in ballast water treatment may have a material adverse effect on our future performance, results of operations, cash flows and financial position.

Port State regulation significantly affects the operation of vessels, as it commonly is more stringent than international rules and standards. This is the case particularly in the United States and, increasingly, in Europe. Non-compliance with such laws and regulations can give rise to civil or criminal liability, and/or vessel delays and detentions in the jurisdictions in which we operate.

Our vessels are subject to scheduled and unscheduled inspections by regulatory and enforcement authorities, as well as private maritime industry entities. This includes inspections by Port State control authorities, harbor masters or equivalent entities, classification societies, flag Administrations (country in which the vessel is registered), charterers, and terminal operators. Our port terminals are subject to inspections by the National Board of Hidrografia and the Free Zone Authority in Uruguay and the Environmental Secretary in Paraguay. Certain of these entities require us to obtain permits, licenses and certificates for the operation of our vessels and port facilities. Failure to maintain necessary permits or approvals could result in the imposition of substantial penalties or require us to incur substantial costs or temporarily suspend operation of one or more of our vessels or port terminals.

Heightened levels of environmental and quality concerns among insurance underwriters, regulators, and charterers continue to lead to greater inspection and safety requirements on all vessels and may accelerate the scrapping of older vessels throughout the industry. Increasing environmental concerns have created a demand for vessels that conform to stricter environmental standards. Vessel owners are required to maintain operating standards for all vessels that will emphasize operational safety, quality, maintenance, continuous training of officers and crews, and compliance with local and international regulations.

The legal requirements and maritime industry standards to which we and our vessels are subject are set forth below, along with the risks associated therewith. We may be required to make substantial capital and other expenditures to ensure that we remain in compliance with these requirements and standards, as well as with standards imposed by our customers, including costs for ship modifications and changes in operating procedures. We also maintain insurance coverage against pollution liability risks for all of our vessels in the amount of $1.0 billion in the aggregate for any one event. The insured risks include penalties and fines, as well as civil liabilities and expenses resulting from accidental pollution. However, this insurance coverage is subject to exclusions, deductibles, and other terms and conditions. In addition, claims relating to pollution incidents for intentional or knowing violations of local environmental laws or the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships may be considered by our protection and indemnity associations on a discretionary basis only. If any liabilities or expenses fall within an exclusion from coverage, or if damages from a catastrophic incident exceed the aggregate liability of $1.0 billion for any one event, our cash flow, profitability and financial position could be adversely impacted.

Because international conventions, laws, regulations, and other requirements are often revised, we cannot predict the ultimate cost of compliance or the impact on the fair market price or useful life of our vessels, nor can we assure that our vessels will be able to attain and maintain certifications of compliance with various regulatory requirements.

Similarly, governmental regulation of the shipping industry, particularly in the areas of safety and environmental requirements, are expected to become stricter in the future. We believe that the heightened environmental, quality, and security concerns of insurance underwriters, regulators, and charterers will lead to additional requirements, including enhanced risk assessment and security requirements, greater inspection and safety requirements, and heightened due diligence obligations. We also may be required to take certain of our vessels out of service for extended periods of time to address changing legal requirements, which would result in lost revenue. In the future, market conditions may not justify these expenditures or enable us to operate our vessels, particularly older vessels, profitably during the remainder of their economic lives. This could lead to significant asset write-downs.

Specific examples of expected changes that could have a significant, and potentially material, impact on our business include:

For a more detailed discussion regarding the details of these international and domestic laws, see “Item 4.B. Information on the Company—Business Overview—REGULATION.”

The Company is subject to extensive environmental legislation, and if the Company or its subsidiaries do not carrycomply with the applicable regulations, the Company’s business may be adversely affected.

If, during the course of our operations, any strike insurance forspillage of polluting products into the marine environment occurs, and the activities of one or more vessels are stopped, our vessels. Asbusiness, results of operations, and reputation may be damaged.

In addition, new or more stringent environmental standards (including measures to address climate change) imposed on us could require additional investments that may vary widely from those currently planned, and, as a result, if we weremay be adversely affected.

We may be liable for losses and damages to third parties, including environmental damages.

Environmental legislation in certain jurisdictions where we operate imposes strict civil liability on anyone who causes, directly or indirectly, environmental degradation. Therefore, the duty to repair or indemnify the damages caused to the environment and to affected third parties does not depend on intent or guilt, but rather on the existence of any damage as a result of the activity carried out. The payment of substantial environmental fines or charges may have a material adverse effect on the Company. Further, a single action can result in environmental liability in civil, criminal or administrative proceedings, or any combination thereof. The absence of responsibility in one of these spheres does not necessarily exempt the accused from responsibility in the others. Should we cause or otherwise be held responsible for any environmental damage, we may experience an adverse effect on our business and results of operation.

We may fail to comply with the conditions provided for under our environmental licenses.

Our operations depend on environmental licensing granted by governmental authorities. Such licensing is usually subject to technical conditions that may involve limitations on our operations. We may fail to comply with the aforementioned conditions and become subject to a labor strike, we may incur uninsured losses,fines or the revocation or suspension of our licenses, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

We do not currently maintain any strike insurance for our vessels. As a result, ifRisks Relating to the crew of our vessels were to initiate a labor strike, we could incur uninsured liabilities and losses as a result. There can be no guarantee that we will be able to obtain additional insurance coverage in the future, and even if we are able to obtain additional coverage, we may not carry sufficient insurance coverage to satisfy potential claims. Should uninsured losses occur, it could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

A change in tax laws, treaties or regulations, or their interpretation, of any countryCountries in which we operate could result in a high tax rate on our earnings, which could result in a significant negative impact on our earnings and cash flows from operations.Operate

Tax laws and regulations are highly complex and subject to interpretation. Consequently, we are subject to changing tax laws, treaties and regulations in and between countries in which we operate. Our income tax expense is based upon our interpretation of tax laws in effect in various countries at the time that the expense was incurred. A change in these tax laws, treaties or regulations, or in the interpretation thereof, or in the valuation of our deferred tax assets, could result in a materially higher tax expense or a higher effective tax rate on us, and such change could be significant to our financial results. If any tax authority successfully challenges our operational structure, inter-company pricing policies or the taxable presence of our key subsidiaries in certain countries; or if the terms of certain income tax treaties are interpreted in a manner that is adverse to our structure; or if we lose a material tax dispute in any country, our effective tax rate on our earnings could increase substantially and our earnings and cash flows from these operations could be materially adversely affected.

We are a majority-owned subsidiary of Navios Holdings, through which significant controlling stockholders, along with members of our management team, may exert considerable influence over our actions in ways that may not serve the interests of investors.

Navios Holdings and Peers Business Inc. are our significant stockholders. Angeliki Frangou, our Chairman, beneficially owns approximately 30.6% of the outstanding common stock of Navios Holdings. Peers Business Inc., which is owned by Claudio Pablo Lopez, our Chief Executive Officer, Horacio Enrique Lopez, our Chief Operating Officer — Shipping Division, and Carlos Augusto Lopez, our Chief Commercial Officer — Shipping Division, owns 36.2% of our outstanding common stock. Navios Holdings and Peers Business Inc., as the beneficial owners of our common stock have the power to control our actions and the outcome of matters on which our stockholders are entitled to vote. Navios Holdings, Ms. Frangou and the Lopez family may pursue interests different from your interests in determining these matters.

In addition, we and our shareholders are party to a shareholders’ agreement. Pursuant to this shareholders’ agreement, when we became subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), the shares of our common stock held by Navios Holdings were to convert into shares of Class B Common Stock, with each share of Class B Common Stock entitling its holder to ten votes per share. Navios Holdings has currently waived such conversion provision. If and when the conversion occurs, it will permit Navios Holdings to control our business even if it does not hold a majority economic interest in our company. See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions.”

We have a meaningful relationship with Navios Holdings, and we depend on Navios Holdings for certain legal, advisory, administrative and other services and benefit from its global network to obtain competitive financing. If our relationship with Navios Holdings ended or was significantly altered, our business and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

Navios Holdings has indicated that it has been evaluating a number of strategic alternatives for us, including our becoming an independent business. While there can be no certainty as to timing, Navios Holdings could decide to pursue these alternatives during 2018. We are party to an administrative services agreement with Navios Holdings (the “Administrative Services Agreement”), pursuant to which Navios Holdings will provide certain services to us, including bookkeeping, audit and accounting services, legal and insurance services, administrative and clerical services, banking and financial services, advisory services, client and investor relations and integration of any acquired businesses. We will rely on Navios Holdings to perform obligations under the agreement. If we undergo a change of control, Navios Holdings may terminate this agreement upon 120 days’ notice. If this agreement is terminated or our relationship with Navios Holdings ended or was significantly altered, we may not have access to these services or be able to capitalize on Navios Holdings’ global network of relationships to source acquisitions, obtain competitive debt financing, and engage in innovative financing and could incur operational difficulties or losses. In addition, we may not benefit from the same financial flexibility our association with Navios Holdings provides us and, as a result, may not be able to access debt financing on favorable terms, or at all. If our relationship with Navios Holdings ends or is significantly altered, our business, results of operations and financial position could be materially adversely affected. See “Item 7.B Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions — Administrative Services Agreement.”

Certain of our directors, officers, and principal stockholders are affiliated with entities engaged in business activities similar to those conducted by us which may compete directly with us, causing such persons to have conflicts of interest.

Some of our directors, officers and principal stockholders have affiliations with entities that have similar business activities to those conducted by us. Our controlling stockholder, Navios Holdings, is a global, vertically integrated seaborne shipping and logistics company which operates numerous businesses focused on the transport and transshipment of dry bulk commodities including iron ore, coal and grain. In addition, certain of our directors are also directors of shipping companies and they may enter similar businesses in the future. These other

affiliations and business activities may give rise to certain conflicts of interest in the course of such individuals’ affiliation with us. Although we do not prevent our directors, officers and principal stockholders from having such affiliations, we use our best efforts to cause such individuals to comply with all applicable laws and regulations in addressing such conflicts of interest. Our officers and employee directors devote their full time and attention to our ongoing operations, and ournon-employee directors devote such time as is necessary and required to satisfy their duties as directors of a company.

Our success depends upon our management team and other employees, and if we are unable to attract and retain key management personnel and other employees, our results of operations may be negatively impacted.

Our success depends to a significant extent upon the abilities and efforts of our management team and our ability to retain them. In particular, many members of our senior management team, including our Chairman, our Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer, our Chief Operating Officers and our Chief Commercial Officer, have extensive experience in the logistics and shipping industries. If we were to lose their services for any reason, it is not clear whether any available replacements would be able to manage our operations as effectively. The loss of any of the members of our management team could impair our ability to identify and secure vessel contracts, to maintain good customer relations and to otherwise manage our business, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial performance and our ability to compete. We do not maintain key man insurance on any of our officers. Further, the efficient and safe operation of our fleet and ports requires skilled and experienced crew members and employees. Difficulty in hiring and retaining such crew members and employees could adversely affect our results of operations.

We are incorporated in the Republic of the Marshall Islands, a country that does not have a well-developed body of corporate law, which may negatively affect the ability of public stockholders to protect their interests.

Our corporate affairs are governed by our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation and bylaws and by the Marshall Islands Business Corporations Act or the BCA. The provisions of the BCA resemble the provisions of the corporation laws of a number of states in the United States. However, there have been few judicial cases in the Republic of the Marshall Islands interpreting the BCA. The rights and fiduciary responsibilities of directors under the law of the Republic of the Marshall Islands are not as clearly established as the rights and fiduciary responsibilities of directors under statutes or judicial precedent in existence in certain U.S. jurisdictions. Stockholder rights may differ as well. The BCA does specifically incorporate thenon-statutory law, or judicial case law, of the State of Delaware and other states with substantially similar legislative provisions. Accordingly, investors may have more difficulty protecting their interests in the face of actions by management, directors or controlling stockholders than they would in the case of a corporation incorporated in the State of Delaware or other U.S. jurisdictions.

We, and certain of our officers and directors may be difficult to serve with process as we and our subsidiaries are incorporated in various jurisdictions outside the United States and certain of our officers and directors may reside outside of the United States.

We are a corporation organized under the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands. Our guarantors are organized under the laws of Argentina, the Republic of the Marshall Islands, Panama, Paraguay, Brazil and Uruguay. Certain of our directors and officers are residents of Greece or othernon-U.S. jurisdictions. Substantial portions of the assets of these persons are located in Argentina, Greece, Panama, Paraguay, Uruguay or othernon-U.S. jurisdictions. Thus, it may not be possible for investors to affect service of process upon us, our guarantors, or ournon-U.S. directors or officers, or to enforce any judgment obtained against these persons in U.S. courts. Also, it may not be possible to enforce U.S. securities laws or judgments obtained in U.S. courts against these persons in anon-U.S. jurisdiction.

We are a holding company, and depend entirely on the ability of our subsidiaries to distribute funds to us in order to satisfy our financial and other obligations.

We are a holding company, and as such we have no significant assets other than the equity interests of our subsidiaries. Our subsidiaries conduct all of our operations and own all of our operating assets. As a result, our ability to service our indebtedness and satisfy our obligations depends on the performance of our subsidiaries and their ability to distribute funds to us. The ability of our subsidiaries to make distributions to us may be restricted by, among other things, restrictions under our credit facilities and applicable laws of the jurisdictions of their incorporation or organization. For example, our subsidiaries’ future credit agreements may contain significant restrictions on the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends or make other transfers of funds to us. Further, some countries in which our subsidiaries are incorporated require our subsidiaries to receive central bank approval before transferring funds out of that country. If we are unable to obtain funds from our subsidiaries, we will not be able to service our debt and satisfy our obligations unless we obtain funds from other sources, which may not be possible.

We are a “foreign private issuer” which exempts us from certain SEC requirements.

We are a foreign private issuer within the meaning of rules promulgated under the Exchange Act. As such, we are exempt from certain provisions applicable to United States public companies including:

Accordingly, investors in the 2022 Senior Notes will not be able to obtain information of the type described above except as otherwise required by our indenture governing the 2022 Senior Notes.

Our international activities increase the compliance risks associated with economic and trade sanctions imposed by the United States, the European Union and other jurisdictions.

Our international operations and activities could expose us to risks associated with trade and economic sanctions, prohibitions or other restrictions imposed by the United States or other governments or organizations, including the United Nations, the European Union and its member countries. Under economic and trade sanctions laws, governments may seek to impose modifications to, prohibitions/restrictions on business practices and activities, and modifications to compliance programs, which may increase compliance costs, and, in the event of a violation, may subject us to fines and other penalties.

Iran

During the last few years until January 2016, the scope of sanctions imposed against Iran, the government of Iran and persons engaging in certain activities or doing certain business with and relating to Iran was expanded by a number of jurisdictions, including the United States, the European Union and Canada. In 2010, the United States enacted the Comprehensive Iran Sanctions Accountability and Divestment Act (“CISADA”), which expanded the scope of the former Iran Sanctions Act. The scope of U.S. sanctions against Iran were expanded subsequent to CISADA by, among other U.S. laws, the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 (the “2012 NDAA”), the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012 (“ITRA”), Executive Order 13662, and the Iran Freedom and Counter-Proliferation Act of 2012 (“IFCA”). The foregoing laws, among other things, expanded the application of prohibitions tonon-U.S. companies, such as our company, and introduced limits on the ability ofnon-U.S. companies and othernon-U.S. persons to do business or trade with Iran when such activities relate to specific trade and investment activities involving Iran / activities such as investment in Iran, the supply or export of refined petroleum or refined petroleum products to Iran, the supply and delivery of goods to Iran which could

enhance Iran’s petroleum or energy sectors, and the transportation of crude oil from Iran to countries which do not enjoy Iran crude oil sanctions waivers. U.S. economic sanctions on Iran fall into two general categories: “Primary” sanctions, which prohibit U.S. persons or U.S. companies and their foreign branches, U.S. citizens, U.S. permanent residents, persons within the territory of the United States from engaging in all direct and indirect trade and other transactions with Iran without U.S. government authorization, and “secondary” sanctions, which are mainly nuclear-related sanctions. While most of the U.S. nuclear-related sanctions with respect to Iran and the EU sanctions on Iran (including, inter alia, CISADA, ITRA, and IFCA) were lifted on January 16, 2016 through the implementation of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (“JCPOA”) entered into between the permanent members of the United Nations Security Council (China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States) and Germany, there are still certain limitations in place with which we need to comply. The primary sanctions with which U.S. persons or transactions with a U.S. nexus must comply are still in force and have not been lifted or relaxed, except in a very limited fashion. Additionally, the sanctions lifted under the JCPOA could be reimposed (“snapped back”) at any time if Iran violates the JCPOA or the United States does not certify that Iran is in compliance with the JCPOA.

After the lifting of most of the nuclear-related sanctions on January 16, 2016, EU sanctions remain in place in relation to the export of arms and military goods listed in the EU common military list, missiles-related goods and items that might be used for internal repression. The main nuclear-related EU sanctions which remain in place include restrictions on:

Dealing with the above is no longer prohibited, but prior authorization must be obtained first and is granted on acase-by-case basis. The remaining restrictions apply to the sale, supply, transfer or export, directly or indirectly to any Iranian person/for use in Iran, as well as the provision of technical assistance, financing or financial assistance in relation to the restricted activity. Certain individuals and entities remain sanctioned and the prohibition to make available, directly or indirectly, economic resources or assets to or for the benefit of sanctioned parties remains. “Economic resources” is widely defined and it remains prohibited to provide vessels for a fixture from which a sanctioned party (or parties related to a sanctioned party) directly or indirectly benefits. It is therefore still necessary to carry out due diligence on the parties and cargoes involved in fixtures involving Iran.

Russia/Ukraine

As a result of the crisis in Ukraine and the annexation of Crimea by Russia in 2014, both the U.S. and EU have implemented sanctions against certain persons and entities.

The EU has imposed travel bans and asset freezes on certain Russian persons and entities pursuant to which it is prohibited to make available, directly or indirectly, economic resources or assets to or for the benefit of the sanctioned parties. Certain Russian ports including Kerch Commercial Seaport; Sevastopol Commercial Seaport and Port Feodosia are subject to the above restrictions. Other entities are subject to sectoral sanctions which limit the provision of equity financing and loans to the listed entities. In addition, various restrictions on trade have been implemented which, amongst others, include a prohibition on the import into the EU of goods originating in

Crimea or Sevastopol as well as restrictions on trade in certaindual-use and military items and restrictions in relation to various items of technology associated with the oil industry for use in deep water exploration and production, Arctic oil exploration and production or shale oil projects in Russia. As such, it is important to carry out due diligence on the parties and cargoes involved in fixtures relating to Russia.

The United States has imposed sanctions against certain designated Russian entities and individuals (“U.S. Russian Sanctions Targets”). These sanctions block the property and all interests in property of the U.S. Russian Sanctions Targets. This effectively prohibits U.S. persons from engaging in any economic or commercial transactions with the U.S. Russian Sanctions Targets unless the same are authorized by the U.S. Treasury Department. Similar to EU sanctions, U.S. sanctions also entail restrictions on certain exports from the United States to Russia and the imposition of Sectoral Sanctions which restrict the provision of equity and debt financing to designated Russian entities. While the prohibitions of these sanctions are not directly applicable to us, we have compliance measures in place to guard against transactions with U.S. Russian Sanctions Targets which may involve the United States or U.S. persons and thus implicate prohibitions. The United States also maintains prohibitions on trade with Crimea.

Venezuela-Related Sanctions

The U.S. sanctions with respect to Venezuela prohibit dealings with designated Venezuelan government officials, and curtail the provision of financing to PDVSA and other government entities. EU sanctions against Venezuela are primarily governed by EU Council Regulation 2017/2063 of 13 November 2017 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Venezuela. This includes financial sanctions and restrictions on listed persons and an arms embargo and related prohibitions and restrictions including restrictions related to internal repression.

Other U.S. Economic Sanctions Targets

In addition to Iran and certain Russian entities and individuals, as indicated above, the United States maintains economic sanctions against Syria, Sudan, Cuba, North Korea, and sanctions against entities and individuals (such as entities and individuals in the foregoing targeted countries, designated terrorists, narcotics traffickers) whose names appear on the List of SDNs and Blocked Persons maintained by the U.S. Treasury Department (collectively, “Sanctions Targets”). We are subject to the prohibitions of these sanctions to the extent that any transaction or activity we engage in involves Sanctions Targets and a U.S. person or otherwise has a nexus to the United States.

Other EU Economic Sanctions Targets

The EU also maintains sanctions against Syria, Sudan, North Korea and certain other countries and against individuals listed by the EU. These restrictions apply to our operations and as such, to the extent that these countries may be involved in any business it is important to carry out checks to ensure compliance with all relevant restrictions and to carry out due diligence checks on counterparties and cargoes.

Compliance

Considering the aforementioned U.S. prohibitions of as well as EU sanctions and the nature of our business, there is a sanctions risk for us due to the worldwide nature of the shipping and logistics business, which we seek to minimize by the implementation of our corporate Sanctions policy and our compliance with all applicable sanctions and embargo laws and regulations. Although we intend to maintain such compliance, there can be no assurance that we will be in compliance in the future, particularly as the scope of certain laws may be unclear and may be subject to changing interpretations, and the law may change. Moreover, despite, for example, relevant provisions in our contracts forbidding the use of our assets in trade that would violate economic sanctions, our counterparties may nevertheless violate applicable sanctions and embargo laws and regulations and those

violations could in turn negatively affect our reputation and be imputed to us. In addition, given our relationship with Navios Holdings, we cannot give any assurance that an adverse finding against Navios Holdings by a governmental or legal authority or others with respect to the matters discussed herein or any future matter related to regulatory compliance by Navios Holdings or ourselves will not have a material adverse impact on our business, reputation or the value of our securities.

We are constantly monitoring developments in the United States, the European Union and other jurisdictions that maintain economic sanctions against Iran, other countries, and other sanctions targets, including developments in implementation and enforcement of such sanctions programs. Expansion of sanctions programs, embargoes and other restrictions in the future (including additional designations of countries and persons subject to sanctions), or modifications in how existing sanctions are interpreted or enforced, could prevent our vessels from calling in ports in sanctioned countries or could limit their cargoes. If any of the risks described above materialize, it could have a material adverse impact on our business and results of operations.

To reduce the risk of violating economic sanctions, we have a policy of compliance with applicable economic sanctions laws and have implemented and continue to implement and diligently follow compliance procedures to avoid economic sanctions violations.

We could be materially adversely affected by violations of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the U.K. Bribery Act, and anti-corruption laws in other applicable jurisdictions.

As an international logistics company, we may operate in countries known to have a reputation for corruption. The U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 (the “FCPA”) and other anti-corruption laws and regulations in applicable jurisdictions generally prohibit companies registered with the SEC and their intermediaries from making improper payments to government officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. Under the FCPA, U.S. companies may be held liable for some actions taken by strategic or local partners or representatives. Legislation in other countries includes the U.K. Bribery Act 2010 (the “U.K. Bribery Act”) which is broader in scope than the FCPA because it does not contain an exception for facilitation payments. We and our customers may be subject to these and similar anti-corruption laws in other applicable jurisdictions. Failure to comply with legal requirements could expose us to civil and/or criminal penalties, including fines, prosecution and significant reputational damage, all of which could materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations, including our relationships with our customers, and our financial results. Compliance with the FCPA, the U.K. Bribery Act and other applicable anti-corruption laws and related regulations and policies imposes potentially significant costs and operational burdens on us. Moreover, the compliance and monitoring mechanisms that we have in place including our Code of Ethics and our anti-bribery and anti-corruption policy, may not adequately prevent or detect all possible violations under applicable anti-bribery and anti-corruption legislation. However, we believe that the procedures we have in place to prevent bribery are adequate and that they should provide a defense in most circumstances to a violation or a mitigation of applicable penalties, at least under the U.K.’s Bribery Act.

Risks Relating to Argentina

Argentine government actions concerning the economy, including decisions with respect to inflation, interest rates, price controls, foreign exchange controls, devaluation, wages and taxes, restrictions on production, imports and exports, and governmental measures in response to the COVID-19 pandemic have had and could continue to have a material adverse effect on us. We cannot provide any assurance that future economic, social and political developments in Argentina, over which we have no control, will not impair our business, financial condition or results of operations, the guarantees or the market price of the 2022 Senior2025 Notes.

The economic conditions of Argentina may affect the financial condition and results of operations of our Argentine subsidiary.

The financial condition and the results of operations of our Argentine subsidiary depend to a large extent on political, macroeconomic and regulatory circumstances in Argentina. The Argentine economy has experienced significant volatility in recent years, including several periods of low or negative growth and high and variable levels of inflation and devaluation. The Argentine economy is currently in recession, exacerbated by the global COVID-19 pandemic, which may result in increased inflation or further economic deterioration in Argentina. There can be no assurance that the condition of the Argentine economy will improve in the future. As a result, both the policies that could be adopted by the Argentine government, as well as future economic, macroeconomic, regulatory, social and political environmentcircumstances or developments in Argentina could have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition or results of operations of our local subsidiaries as well as the value of certain of our assets.

As a result, both the policies that could be adopted by the Argentine government and future economic, macroeconomic, regulatory, social and political circumstances in Argentina is uncertain.could have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition or results of operations of our local subsidiaries.

The administration that tookimpact of political developments in Argentina remains uncertain and could adversely affect the Argentine economy.

Since taking office in Argentina on December 10, 20152019, the Fernandez administration has announced and implemented severalintroduced significant economic and policy reforms, including reforms toreforms. On December 21, 2019, the Argentine Congress approved the “Social Solidarity and Productive Reactivation Law,” which entered into force on December 23, 2019. This law declared a public emergency in economic, financial, fiscal, administrative, pension, tariff, energy, health and social matters, and introduced several tax changes in Argentina, such as income tax, personal assets tax, taxation on the purchase of foreign exchange market in order to provide

greater flexibility and easier access to the foreign exchange market. Likewise, export duties on several agricultural productscurrency and export duties on most industrialcertain services.

The Fernandez administration established the right of affected workers to receive twice the legally mandated severance pay in case of dismissal without just cause. A progressive reduction of the doubled severance pay in case of dismissal without just cause was implemented on December 2021. In 2020, the Argentinean government issued Decree No. 329/2020 restricting the ability to terminate employment with or without cause which has been extended thus far until June 30, 2022.

The Argentinean government was under negotiations with the International Monetary Fund (the “IMF”) to restructure Argentina’s debts with the IMF. In 2022, the board of the IMF approved a new program with Argentina for about $44.0 billion. Any failure from Argentina to comply with this new agreement or to eventually restructure its debt can lead to a default scenario which could adversely affect our result of operations and mining exports were eliminated.our business.

We can offer no assurances as tocannot provide any assurance that the policies that may be implemented byof the new ArgentineFernandez administration or thatfuture economic, regulatory, social and political developments or social unrest in Argentina will not adversely affect the Argentine economy and impair our business, financial condition andor results of operations.

The continuing

Continuing inflation may have material adverse effects on the Argentine economy.

In the past, Argentina has experienced periods offaced and continues to face high inflation. Inflation has increased since 2005 and remained relatively high for more than a decade. The reliability of INDEC’s statistics has been widely questioned. In February 2013, the IMF censured Argentina for its inaccurate financial statistics. In response, in 2014, INDEC adopted the IPCNu, an improved methodology for calculating the CPI , and estimated the 2014 CPI to be 23.9%.

However, the current administration as one of its first measures declared a state of administrative emergency, suspending momentarily the publication of all indexes until the INDEC is capable of accurately calculating such indexes. During this suspension period, the inflation rate was informed through data provided by the City of Buenos Aires and the province of San Luis.

On July 15, 2016, INDEC published its inflation index again, indicating that the CPI showed, for June, July, August, September, October, November and December of 2016, variations of 3.1%, 2%, 0.2%, 1.1%, 2.4%, 1.6% and 1.2% compared to previous month, respectively. Furthermore, according to the most recent publicly available information, the inflation rate was 24.8% for the year 2017.

On the other hand, INDEC published the index of poverty and indigence, which estimated that poverty reaches 28.6% of Argentines and indigence, 6.2% during the first semester of 2017.

As a result of the readjustment of INDEC indexes, the IMF Executive Board announced, on November 9, 2016, the lifting of the censorship imposed on Argentina in 2013 due to lack of consistency in its statistical data.

inflationary pressures. Over the last few years, the Argentine government has implemented certain programs aimed at controlling inflation and monitoring the prices of many goods and services, including price agreements between the Argentine government and private sector companies.

According to official information published by the Argentine Statistics and Census Institute (Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos), the inter-annual inflation recorded for the years 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2021 reached 47.6%, 53.8%, 36.1% and 50.9%, respectively. The increase in wagessalaries and public spending,expenditure under the adjustment of some utility tariffs and the expiration of the price agreements signed by the Argentine governmentnew Fernandez administration could have a direct influence on inflation. In the past, inflation undermined the Argentine economy substantially, as well as the ability of the Argentine government to create conditions leading to growth. In turn, because part of the Argentine debt is adjusted by the Reference Stabilization Coefficient (“CER”), strongly related to inflation, its increase would have a negative effect on the level of public indebtedness.

A high inflation economy could undermine Argentina’s cost competitiveness abroad if not offset by a devaluation of the Argentine peso, which could also negatively affect economic activity and employment levels. While most of the clientFreight under those contracts ofwith clients from our Argentine subsidiaries aresubsidiary is denominated in U.S. dollars freight under those contractsand is collected in Argentine pesos at the prevailing exchange rate. These contracts also include crew cost adjustment terms. Uncertainty about future inflation may contribute to slowdown or contraction in economic

growth. Argentine inflation rate volatility makes it impossible to estimate with reasonable certainty the extent to which activity levels and results of operations of our Argentine subsidiariessubsidiary could be affected by inflation and exchange rate volatility in the future. There can be no assurance that inflation rates will not continue to escalate in the future or that the measures adopted or that may be adopted by the Fernandez administration to control inflation will be effective or successful.

Notwithstanding the economic environment in Argentina, including Argentina’s increase of its monetary base to finance public expenditures, and the resulting high inflation as of December 31, 2021, we do not consider inflation to be a significant risk factor to our cost of doing business in the future as the functional currency of our Argentine subsidiary is the U.S. dollar. In addition, the day-to-day operations of our Argentine subsidiary are dependent on the relative value of the Argentine peso to the U.S. dollar.

The current and future foreign exchange policy of Argentina may affect the ability of our Argentine Central Banksubsidiary to make money remittances outside of Argentina.

In Argentina, since the amendment of the convertibility law in December 2001, the Argentine government has imposed several restrictions on the purchase of foreign currency in the exchange market and the transfer of funds outside of Argentina, and other exchange controlssubstantially limiting the ability of companies to retain foreign currency or make payments abroad, including the distribution of dividends Beginning in the past and may do so in the future, which could prevent our Argentine subsidiaries from transferring funds for the payment of the 2022 Senior Notes or the related guarantees.

In 2001 and during the first half of 2002, Argentina experienced a massive withdrawal of deposits from the Argentine financial system in a short period of time, which precipitated a liquidity crisis within the Argentine financial system, which promptedDecember 2015, the Argentine government to imposegradually eased such restrictions, until their complete lifting in 2017. However, on September 1, 2019, the Argentine government reinstated exchange controls and restrictions on transfers abroad. These new controls and restrictions currently apply with respect to access to the Argentine foreign exchange market for purchase of foreign currencies, the payment of external financial debts, the payment of dividends and corporate profits, payments of imports of goods and services, among other things, and impose the obligation to repatriate and settle the proceeds from exports of goods and services in Argentine pesos. In addition, the Argentine Central Bank established certain regulations to avoid practices and transactions aimed to circumvent, through the use of securities and other instruments, the restrictions set forth by the current foreign exchange control regulations.

As of the date hereof, the restrictions outlined above remain in place. As a consequence of the deepening of exchange controls, the difference between the official exchange rate, which is currently utilized for both commercial and financial operations, and other informal exchange rates that arose implicitly as a result of certain operations commonly carried out in the capital markets (“dollar MEP” or “Blue Chip Swaps (contado con liquidación)”), increased during 2021, creating a gap of approximately 100% with the official exchange rate as of December 31, 2021.

The Argentine government could maintain a single official exchange rate or create multiple exchange rates for different types of transactions. Further, the imposition by the Argentine government of further regulations, exchange controls and restrictions or other measures in response to capital outflows or the devaluation of the Argentine peso could weaken public finances. Such measures may negatively affect Argentina’s international competitiveness, discouraging foreign investments and lending by foreign investors or increasing foreign capital outflow which could have an adverse effect on economic activity in Argentina, and which in turn could adversely affect our business in Argentina and results of operations of our Argentine subsidiary.

As a result of the foreign exchange control regulations in Argentina, our local subsidiaries may not be able to freely access the Argentine foreign exchange market to acquire U.S. dollars and from transferring funds outside of Argentina. Further, as part of the foreign exchange restrictions, an Argentine financial institution may at its absolute discretion refuse to carry out a transfer of funds out of Argentina or may request a formal approval from the Argentine Central Bank before proceeding with the transfer of funds out of Argentina.

Any operation that does not comply with the provisions of the foreign exchange regulations is subject to Law No. 19,359 of the Foreign Exchange Criminal Regime in Argentina.

The Argentine government could maintain these exchange controls, impose new controls, strengthen transfer restrictions or impose other requirements that may impair the ability of depositorsour local subsidiaries to withdraw their deposits. Despite the reduction on some of these restrictions in the following years, significant government controls and restrictions remained in place.

In December 2015, the Argentine government implemented several reforms toaccess the foreign exchange market, regulations and provided easier access to the foreign exchange market for individuals and companies. Consequently, as from December 17, 2015, the new financial indebtedness transactionsacquire U.S. dollars, or transfer funds abroad of thenon-financial private sector, financial sector and local governments will not be subject toArgentina. Any or all of these actions could materially affect the obligation to bring to and liquidate funds in the Mercado Unico de Libre Cambio (“MULC,” single and free floating foreign exchange market). Fund liquidation at MULC will be a condition precedent for the further access to that market so as to cater to capital and interest services. If the funding enters local accounts in foreign currency in the country, the liquidationability of the local subsidiaries to transfer funds deposited will need to be evidenced.

Additionally, pursuant to recent regulations, financial indebtedness taken through the MULCabroad, and financial debt rollovers withnon-residents in the financial sector andnon-financial private sector will not need to meet a minimum period of stay, and may be canceled at any time.

Some remaining controls and restrictions, and any additional restrictions of this kind that may be imposed in the future, could impairtherefore affecting our ability to transfer funds generated byservice our debt and satisfy our obligations.

The Argentine government has made certain changes to its tax rules that affected our operations in U.S. dollars outside Argentina to us for the payment of our indebtedness. In addition, any other restrictions or requirements that may be imposed in the future, expose us topast, and could further increase the risk of losses arising from fluctuationsfiscal burden on our operations in Argentina in the exchange rate of the Argentine peso.future.

The Argentine government has made certain changes to its tax rules that affected our operations in Argentina in the past, and could further increase the fiscal burden on our operations in Argentina in the future.

Since 1992, the Argentine government has not permitted the application of an inflation adjustment on the value of fixed assets for tax purposes. Since the substantial devaluation of the Argentine peso in 2002, the amounts that the Argentine tax authorities permit us to deduct as depreciation for our past investments in plant, property and equipment have been substantially reduced, resulting in a higher effective income tax charge.

However, in December 2016, a reform to the Income Tax Law was passed by the National Congress. Some of the main modifications were: (i) personal deductions were raised; (ii) a new scale of aliquots was established,

including a greater number of tranches and beginning taxing with a 5% aliquot; (iii) new deductions were established for per diem and room rent; (iv) extra amounts paid to employees in the form of overtime for services on national holidays,non-business days and weekends is exempt from income tax; and (v) the updating of the Average Taxable Compensation for Government Employees (RIPTE) was established as of fiscal year 2018, with respect to personal deduction amounts and tax tranches. In order to finance the reduction of tax resources that these reforms will entail, an indirect tax onon-line betting and an extraordinary tax on US dollar futures transactions were created; in addition, the figure of the surrogate decision-maker in Value Tax Added in relation to operations involving external subjects was established.

If the Argentine government decides to alter the tax burden on our operationsregime in Argentina, our results of operations and financial condition of our Argentine subsidiary could be materially and adversely affected.

Fluctuations in the value of the Argentine peso could adversely affect the Argentine economy, and consequently our results of operations in Argentina or the financial condition of our Argentine subsidiary.

The Argentine peso has suffered significant devaluations against the U.S. dollar in the past and has continued to devalue against the U.S. dollar in recent months. According to Argentina’s Central Bank, the Argentine peso depreciated approximately 17.5% in 2017, 100% in 2018, 56% in 2019, 41% in 2020 and 22% in 2021.

The devaluation of the Argentine peso has had a negative impact on the ability of certain Argentine businesses to honor their foreign currency-denominated debt and has also led to very high inflation and significantly reduced real wages. If the Argentine peso is further significantly devalued, the Argentine economy and our business in Argentina could be adversely affected. As of September 2019, foreign currency controls have been reinstated in Argentina.

The success of any measures taken by the Argentine government to restore market confidence and stabilize the value of the Argentine peso is uncertain. Significant variations in the comparative value of the Argentine peso to the U.S. dollar could adversely affect our business in Argentina and the financial condition and results of operations of our Argentine subsidiary.

The Argentine economy could be adversely affected by economic developments in other global markets.

Argentina’s economy is vulnerable to external shocks that could be caused by adverse developments affecting its principal trading partners. A significant decline in the economic growth of any of Argentina’s major trading partners (including Brazil, the European Union,EU, China and the United States), including as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, could have a material adverse impact on Argentina’s balance of trade and could adversely affect Argentina’s economic growth. In particular, Brazil’s economy, which is Argentina’s largest export market and its principal source of imports, is currently experiencing heightened negative pressure due to the uncertainties stemming from ongoing political crises, including the corruption investigations and allegations and criminal convictions involving certain politicians. The Brazilian economy declined by 3.6% during 2016. In addition, the Brazilian currency lost approximately 17.7% of its value relative to the U.S. dollar in 2016. Brazilian demand for Argentine exports has generally declined over the past five years and further deterioration of economic conditions in Brazil may increasingly reduce demand for Argentine exports and create advantages for Brazilian imports. Further adverse developments in the Brazilian political and economic crisis may have further negative effects on the Argentine economy and our operations.

Argentina may also be affected by other countries that have influence over world economic cycles. If interest rates rise significantly in developed economies, including the United States, emerging market economies, including Argentina, could find it increasingly challenging and expensive to borrow capital and refinance existing debt, which could negatively affect their economic growth.

Future policies of the Argentine government may affect the economy as well as our operations.operations in Argentina.

During the past years the Argentine government took several actions tore-nationalize concessions and public services companies that were privatized in the 1990’s, such as YPF, Aguas Argentinas S.A. and Aerolíneas Argentinas S.A. On May 3, 2012, expropriation law 26,741 was passedFuture expropriations, nationalizations or requisitions, as well as changes in taxation, laws, regulations or policies affecting foreign trade, investment, or others that may be adopted by the Fernandez administration could adversely affect our business in Argentina and the financial condition and results of operations of our Argentine Congress, providing forsubsidiary. For example, the expropriation of 51% ofFernandez administration announced its intention to expropriate a seed trade company, and while certain initial steps were taken by the share capital of YPF S.A., represented by an identical stake of Class D shares owned, directly or indirectly, by Repsol YPF and its controlled or controlling entities, which have been declared of public interest. Thegovernment, no further action was taken from the Argentine government made an offer to compensate Repsol YPF for around $5.0 billion, which was accepted by the Board of Directors and shareholders of Repsol YPF and confirmed by the Argentine Congress.effect such expropriation.

Although the current administration has not implemented or advocated any nationalization or expropriation measures, similar

Similar measures, such as mandatory renegotiation or modification of existing contracts, new taxation policies, changes in laws, regulations and policies affecting foreign trade, investment, among others, that may be adopted by the Argentine government in the future could also adversely affect our business in Argentina, financial condition and results of operations.operations of our Argentine subsidiary.

Risks Relating to Uruguayan Free Zone Regulation

We may be materially and adversely affected by any termination, non-renewal or non-extension of the tax incentives that benefit certain of our subsidiaries in Uruguay.

Certain of our subsidiaries in Uruguay are operating as direct free trade zonedirect-free-trade-zone users under an agreementfree zone user agreements (the “Free Zone User Agreements”) with the Uruguayan Free ZoneZones Department, formerly known as the Free Zones Division of the Uruguayan General DirectorateDepartment of Commerce allowing themTrade. The Free Zone User Agreements allow these subsidiaries to operate in isolated public and private areas within national bordersin Nueva Palmira, Uruguay, and to enjoy tax exemptions and other benefits, such as a generic exemption on present and future Uruguayan national taxes including the Corporate Income Tax, Value-Added Tax and Wealth Tax. Other benefits that oursuch subsidiaries enjoy are simplified corporate law provisions, the ability to negotiate preferential public utility rates with government agencies and government guarantees of maintenance of such benefits and tax exemptions. Free trade zone users do not need to pay import and export tariffs to introduce goods from abroad to the free trade zone, to transfer or send such goods to other free trade zones in Uruguay or send them abroad. These Free Zone Agreements have been extended to 2046 and may be extended further until 2066 at our option. In order to ensure the continuity of these incentives through the course of their terms, our subsidiaries must meet the Free Zone User Agreements or regulations governing free trade zones. However, our subsidiaries may lose all the tax benefits granted to them or be subject to fines if they breachthe Uruguayan Free Zones Department concludes that our subsidiaries breached or failfailed to comply with the Free Zone User Agreements or regulations governing free trade zones. As a result, we could be materially and adversely affected.

The following are some of the causes under which the Uruguayan Free Zones Department may terminate the Free Zone User Agreements prior to expiration: the non fulfilment of the obligations to improve the land, as per the terms of each Free Zone User Agreements; breaches of the terms of the Free Zone User Agreements or the Free Zone Act No. 15,921; violation of labor laws; failure to pay agreed fees to the Uruguayan authorities; failure to make required social security contributions; or the commission of illegal acts or acts expressly forbidden by the Free Zone User Agreements. Should such Uruguayan subsidiaries lose their free zone contracts or framework, including exceedinguser status, they will not be able to operate as free zone users and therefore not able to operate their terminal facilities.

The right of the limitUruguayan Free Zones Department to terminate the Free Zone User Agreements prior to the stated expiration date in the agreement is subject to an explanation onnon-Uruguayan employees or engaging in industrial, commercial or service activities outside the specific factual and the legal basis for the early-termination decision. Not every breach by a free-zone user will entitle the Uruguayan Free Zones Department to terminate a Free Zone User Agreement prior to its stated expiration date. Such a decision must therefore be proportional to the degree of a free trade zone in Uruguay. In this case,alleged noncompliance.

We can provide no assurance that the tax benefits and exemptions granted to our subsidiaries may continue with theirunder the Free Zone User Agreements will be renewed after the expiration of the Free Zone User Agreements, that the Free Zone User Agreements will not be terminated prior to the agreed-upon expiration dates, or that, if renewed or otherwise replaced, the terms of any new Free Zone User Agreements will provide for equivalent or more favorable terms and conditions than those currently in effect. We will be materially and adversely affected if tax incentives that benefit our subsidiaries or the Free Zone User Agreements providing for such incentives are terminated and we are not able to renew or replace them. Even if the Free Zone User Agreements are renewed, if they provide for tax incentives that are not as favorable to us as those currently in effect, our financial condition and results of operations from the free zone, but undercould suffer a different tax regime.material adverse effect.

Other Risks Relating to the Countries in which We Operate

Certain of the countries in which we operate or may in the future operate in have experienced, and may continue to experience or experience in the future, political, legal and economic instability. Our activities may be adversely affected by political or economic instability or changes in law relating to our industry, including changes occurring in response to COVID-19. We areoperate in Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay, Paraguay and other markets. We can provide no assurance that changes in the governments or laws of the jurisdictions in which we operate or in the regulatory environment for our industry or for foreign-domiciled companies in such jurisdictions will not occur, or that such changes will not result in a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

As an international company, that iswe are exposed to the risks of doing business in many different and often less developed andcountries, including risks associated with operations in emerging market countries.countries, whose economies, markets and legal systems may be less developed.

We are an international company and conduct all of our operations outside of the United States, and we expect to continue doing so for the foreseeable future. These operations are performed in countries that are historically less developed and stable than the United States, such as Argentina, Brazil, Bolivia, Paraguay and Uruguay.

Some of the other risks we are generally exposed to through our operations in emerging marketsmarket countries include among others:

These risks may result in unforeseen harm to our business and financial condition. Also, some of our customers are headquartered in South America, and a general decline in the economies of South America, or the instability of certain South American countries and economies, could materially and adversely affect us.

Our business in emerging markets requires us to respond to rapid changes in market conditions in these countries. Our overall success in international markets depends, in part, upon our ability to succeed in different legal, regulatory, economic, social and political conditions. We may not continue to succeed in developing and implementing policies and strategies that will be effective in each location where we do business. Furthermore, the occurrence of any of the foregoing factors may have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

The governments

The governments of Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay have entered into a treaty that commits each of them to participate in a regional initiative to integrate the region’s economies, a central component of which is water transportation in the Hidrovia. Although we believe that this regional initiative of expanding navigation on the Hidrovia river system will result in significant economic benefits, there is no guarantee that such an initiative will ultimately be successful, that each country will follow through on its intention to participate, or that the benefits of this initiative will match our expectations of continuing growth in the Hidrovia or reducing transportation costs. If the regional initiative is unsuccessful, our results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Changes in rules and regulations with respect to cabotage or theirthe interpretation of such rules and regulations in the markets in which we operate could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

In the markets in which we currently operate, in cabotage or regional trades, we are subject to restrictive rules and regulations on a region by region basis. Our operations currently benefit from these rules and regulations or their interpretation. For instance, preferential treatment is extended in Argentine cabotage for Argentine flagged vessels or foreign flagged vessels operated by local established operators with sufficient Argentine tonnage, in accordance with applicable local law, under one to three years’ licenses, including our Argentine cabotage vessels. Changes in cabotage rules and regulations or in their interpretation may have an adverse effect on our current or future cabotage operations, either by becoming more restrictive (which could result in limitations to the utilization of some of our vessels in those trades) or less restrictive (which could result in increased competition in these markets).

Because we generate the majority of our revenues in U.S. dollars but incur a significant portion of our expenses in other currencies, exchange rate fluctuations could cause us to suffer exchange rate losses, thereby increasing expenses and reducing income.

We engage in regional commerce with a variety of entities. Although our operations expose us to certain levels of foreign currency risk, ourOur revenues are predominantly U.S. dollar-denominated at the present. Additionally, our South American subsidiaries transact certain operations in Uruguayan pesos, Paraguayan guaranies, Argentineanguaraníes, Argentine pesos and Brazilian reals;reais; however, all of the subsidiaries’ primary cash flows are U.S. dollar-denominated. Currencies in Argentina and Brazil have fluctuated significantly against the U.S. dollar in the past. As of December 31, 2017, 20162021, 2020 and 20152019 approximately 60.3%50.8%, 61.1%47.8% and 61.9%53.4%, respectively, of our expenses were incurred in currencies other than U.S. dollars. Transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are translated at the exchange rate in effect at the date of each transaction. Expenses incurred in foreign currencies against which the U.S. dollar falls in value can increase, thereby decreasing our income. A greater percentage of our transactions and expenses in the future may be denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars. As part of our overall risk management policy, we may attempt to hedge these risks in exchange rate fluctuations from time to time but cannot guarantee we will be successful in these hedging activities. Future fluctuations in the value of local currencies relative to the U.S. dollar in the countries in which we operate may occur, and if such fluctuations were to occur in one or a combination of the countries in which we operate, our results of operations or financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.

Risks Relating to Our Indebtedness

We have substantial debt and may incur substantial additional debt, which could adversely affect our financial health and our ability to obtain financing in the future, react to changes in our business and make payments on the 2022 Senior2025 Notes the Term Loan B Facility and our other obligations.

At December 31, 2017,2021, we had $542.9approximately $558.4 million in aggregate principal amount of debt including the 2022 Senior Notes and the Term Loan B Facility, outstanding.

Our substantial debt could have important consequences to our business, lenders of the Term Loan B Facility and holders of the 2022 Senior Notes, including the following:

Our ability to service our debt will depend upon, among other things, our future financial and operating performance, which will be affected by prevailing economic conditions and financial, business, regulatory and other factors, some of which are beyond our control. If our operating results are not sufficient to service our current or future indebtedness, we will be forced to take actions such as reducing or delaying our business activities, acquisitions, investments or capital expenditures, selling assets, restructuring or refinancing our debt, or seeking additional equity capital or bankruptcy protection. We may not be able to effect any of these remedies on satisfactory terms, or at all.

Despite our current indebtedness levels,

Further, we and our subsidiaries may be able to incur substantially more debt, including secured debt. This could further exacerbate the risks associated with our substantial indebtedness.

We and our subsidiaries may be able to incur substantial additional indebtedness in the future. The agreements governing the terms of our indebtedness permit us to incur substantial additional indebtedness in accordance with the terms of such agreements. We also may incur new indebtedness if we expand our business or purchase new vessels or for other purposes. If new debt is added to our current debt levels, the related risks that we now face would increase and we may not be able to meet all our debt obligations, including the repayment of the 2025 Notes. In addition, the indenture governing the 2025 Notes does not prevent us from incurring obligations that do not fully prohibit us orconstitute indebtedness as defined therein.

Despite our current indebtedness levels, we and our subsidiaries from doing so.may be able to incur more debt in the future, including secured debt. Additional indebtedness could further exacerbate the risks associated with our substantial indebtedness.

We and our subsidiaries may be able to incur additional indebtedness in the future. The agreements governing the terms of our indebtedness permit us to incur additional indebtedness in accordance with the terms of such agreements. At December 31, 2017,2021, we had $542.9$558.4 million in aggregate principal amount of debt, including the 2022 Senior2025 Notes and the Term Loan B Facility, outstanding. Any secured indebtedness permitted under the 2022 Senior2025 Notes would be effectively senior to the 2022 Senior2025 Notes to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness, as would all indebtedness ofnon-guarantor subsidiaries. We also may incur new indebtedness if we expand our business or purchase new vessels or for other purposes. If new debt is added to our current debt levels, the related risks that we now face would increase and we may not be able to meet all our debt obligations, including the repayment of the 2022 Senior Notes or the Term Loan B Facility.2025 Notes. In addition, the indenture governing the 2022 Senior2025 Notes and the Term Loan B Facility do not prevent us from incurring obligations that do not constitute indebtedness as defined therein.

The indentureagreements and instruments governing the 2022 Senior Notesour debt contain restrictions and the Term Loan B Facility imposeslimitations that could have a significant operating and financial restrictionsnegative impact on us that may limit our ability to successfully operate our business and adversely affect the holders of the 2022 Senior Notes.business.

The indenture governing the 2022 Senior Notesand the Term Loan B Facility2025 Notes imposes significant operating and financial restrictions on us, including those that limit our ability to engage in actions that may be in our long-term interests. These restrictions, among others, may limit our ability to, among other things:

to:

Therefore, we may be restricted from engaging in some corporate and commercial actions that we believe would be in the best interest of our business, which may make it difficult for us to successfully execute our business strategy or effectively compete with companies that are not similarly restricted. Any future credit agreement or other indebtedness may include similar or more restrictive provisions.

We are required to be in compliancecomply with the covenants contained in the indenture governing the 2022 Senior Notes and those of the Term Loan B Facility.2025 Notes. In addition, our future credit agreements may require that we maintain other specific financial covenants. We may be required to take action to reduce our debt or to act in a manner contrary to our business objectives to meet these ratios and satisfy these covenants and ratios. Events beyond our control, including changes in the economic and business conditions in the markets in which we operate, may affect our ability to comply with these covenants. We cannot assure youprovide any assurance that we will meet these ratios or satisfy these covenants or that our lender will waive any failure to do so. A breach of any of the covenants in, or our inability to maintain the required financial ratios under, our credit agreements would prevent us from borrowing additional money under the facilities and could result in a default under them.

The 2025 Notes are secured by: (i) first priority ship mortgages on four tanker vessels servicing our Cabotage Business (the Elena H, Makenita H, Sara H and He Man H) that are owned by certain subsidiary guarantors (such guarantors, the “Mortgaged Vessel Guarantors”), and related assignments of earnings and insurance, together with a first priority lien on the capital stock of each Mortgaged Vessel Guarantor; and (ii) an assignment by way of security of the Vale port contract (collectively, the “Collateral”). Our future debt is likely to be secured by mortgages on our vessels, barges or ports, vessels under construction pursuant to shipbuildingship-building contracts, guarantees by our subsidiaries and/or other related assets, such as assignments of insurances and earnings or some combination of the foregoing. If a default occurs under the 2025 Notes or future credit facilities, the lenders could elect to declare such debt, together with accrued interest and other fees and expenses, to be immediately due and payable and foreclose on the collateral, including our vessels, barges, ports or other assets securing that debt. In a case where a credit facility was used to finance the scheduled payments as they come due under shipbuilding contracts, such a default could result in default by us under the associated shipbuildingship-building contract and possible foreclosure of our rights in the related newbuild.vessel under construction. In addition, a payment default under a shipbuildingship-building contract would give the shipyard the right to terminate the contract without any further obligation to finish construction and may give it rights against us for having failed to make the required payments.

Any loss of vessels or assets could significantly decrease our ability to generate positive cash flow from operations and, therefore, to service our debt. Moreover, if the holders of the 2025 Notes or lenders under a credit facility or other agreement in default were to accelerate the debt outstanding under that facility, it could result in a cross default under other debt. If all or part of our debt were to be accelerated, we may not have or be able to obtain sufficient funds to repay it upon acceleration. This could have serious consequences to our financial condition and results of

operations and could cause us to become bankrupt or insolvent. Our ability to comply with these covenants in future periods will also depend substantially on the value of our assets, our success at keeping our costs low, our ability to successfully implement our overall business strategy, and our charter rates. Any future credit agreement or amendment may contain similar covenants, or covenants that are more restrictive covenants.restrictive.

Our ability to generate the significant amount of cash needed to service our debt obligations and our ability to refinance all or a portion of our indebtedness or obtain additional financing depends on multiplemany factors, many of which may be beyond our control.

Our ability to make scheduled payments on, or to refinance our obligations under, our debt, will depend on our financial and operating performance, which, in turn, will be subject to prevailing economic and competitive conditions and to the financial and business factors, many of which may be beyond our control. We cannot assure youprovide any assurance that our business will generate sufficient cash flow from operations, that currently anticipated business opportunities will be realized on schedule or at all, or that future borrowings will be available to us in amounts sufficient to enable us to service our indebtedness and any amounts borrowed under future credit facilities, or to fund our other liquidity needs.

We will use cash to pay the principal and interest on our debt. These payments limit funds otherwise available for working capital, capital expenditures, vessel acquisitions and other purposes. As a result of these obligations, our current liabilities may exceed our current assets. We may need to take on additional debt as we expand our ports and fleet or make acquisitions,port terminals, which could increase our ratio of debt to equity. The need to service our debt may limit funds available for other purposes and our inability to service debt in the future could lead to acceleration of our debt and foreclosure on our ports or owned vessels.

We cannot assure youprovide any assurance that we will be able to refinance any of our indebtedness or obtain additional financing, particularly because of our anticipated high levels of indebtedness and the indebtedness incurrence restrictions imposed by the agreements governing our indebtedness, as well as prevailing market conditions. We could face substantial liquidity problems and might be required to dispose of material assets or operations to meet our indebtedness service and other obligations.

The indenture governing the 2022 Senior2025 Notes restricts, and any agreements governing future indebtedness may restrict, our ability to dispose of assets and use the proceeds from any such dispositions. If we do not reinvest the proceeds of asset sales in our business (in the case of asset sales ofnon-collateral with respect to such indebtedness) or in new vessels or other related assets that are mortgaged in favor of a lender under a credit facility (in the case of assets sales of collateral securing), we may be required to use the proceeds to repurchase senior indebtedness other than the 2022 Senior Notes. Our Term Loan B Facility contains similar restrictions. We cannot assure youprovide any assurance that we will be able to consummate any asset sales, or if we do, what the timing of the sales will be or whether the proceeds that we realize will be adequate to meet indebtedness service obligations when due.

If the volatility inAs the London InterBankInterbank Offered Rate or LIBOR, continues,(“LIBOR”) is replaced as the reference rate under our debt obligations, it could affect our profitability, earnings and cash flow.

The publication of LIBOR is expected to be discontinued in mid-2023. The U.S. banking agencies issued guidance instructing banks to cease entering into new contracts referencing LIBOR no later than December 31, 2021, with certain exceptions. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York now publishes the Secured Overnight Financing Rate based on overnight U.S. Treasury repurchase agreement transactions, which has been volatile, withrecommended as the spread betweenalternative to U.S. dollar LIBOR by the Alternative Reference Rates Committee convened by the Federal Reserve and the prime lendingFederal Reserve Bank of New York. Accordingly, the method and rate widening significantly at times. These conditions are the result of the recent disruptionsused to calculate our interest rates and/or payments on our floating-rate debt in the international credit markets. Becausefuture may result in interest rates and/or payments that are higher than, or that do not otherwise correlate over time with, the interest rates borne byand/or payments that would have been applicable to our outstanding indebtedness fluctuate with changesobligations if LIBOR was available in LIBOR, if this volatility were to continue, it would affect the amount of interest payable on our debt,its current form, which in turn, could have ana material adverse effect on our profitability, earningsfinancial position, results of operations and cash flow.liquidity.

Furthermore, interest in most loan agreements in our industry has been based on published LIBOR rates. Recently, however, lenders have insisted on provisions that entitle the lenders, in their discretion, to replace published LIBOR as the base for the interest calculation with theircost-of-funds rate. Such provisions could significantly increase our lending costs, which would have an adverse effect on our profitability, earnings and cash flow.

The market values of our vessels may fluctuate significantly which could cause us to be in breach of certain debt covenants inthat we currently have or debt covenants that we may incur.incur in the future.

Factors that influence vessel values include:

If the market values of our owned vessels decrease, we may breach covenants contained in any existing or future credit facility. If we breach such covenants and are unable to remedy any relevant breach, our lenders could accelerate our debt and foreclose on that debt. Any loss of vessels would significantly decrease our ability to generate positive cash flow from operations and, therefore, service our debt. In addition, if the book value of a vessel is impaired due to unfavorable market conditions, or a vessel is sold at a price below its book value, we would incur a loss.

The 2022 Senior Notes are unsecured and structurally subordinated to the rights of our and the guarantors’ existing and future secured creditors.

The indenture governing the 2022 Senior Notes permits us to incur a significant amount of secured indebtedness, including indebtedness to be used for acquisitions of vessels and businesses. At December 31, 2017, we had approximately $542.9 million of indebtedness outstanding, including $136.8 million of secured indebtedness. These secured indebtedness are secured by one pushboat, our tanker vessels and by assignments of certain receivables. The 2022 Senior Notes are unsecured and therefore do not have the benefit of such collateral. Accordingly, the 2022 Senior2025 Notes will be effectively subordinated to all secured indebtedness. If an event of default occurs under any existing or future credit facility or under other future secured indebtedness, the senior secured lenders will have a prior right to our assets mortgaged in their favor, to the exclusion of the holders of the

2022 Senior Notes, even if we are in default under the 2022 Senior Notes. In that event, our assets and the assets of the subsidiary guarantors would first be used to repay in full all indebtedness and other obligations secured by them, resulting in all or a portion of our assets being unavailable to satisfy the claims of the holders of the 2022 Senior Notes and other unsecured indebtedness. Therefore, in the event of any distribution or payment of our assets in any foreclosure, dissolution,winding-up, liquidation, reorganization, or other bankruptcy proceeding, subject to any preferential treatment afforded to resident creditors of any particular jurisdiction, holders of 2022 Senior Notes will participate in our remaining assets ratably with all holders of our unsecured indebtedness that is deemed to be of the same class as such 2022 Senior Notes, and potentially with all of our other general creditors, based upon the respective amounts owed to each holder or creditor or other creditors who receive preferential treatment under applicable law. In any of the foregoing events, we cannot assure you that there will be sufficient assets to pay amounts due on the 2022 Senior Notes. As a result, holders of 2022 Senior Notes may receive less, ratably, than holders of secured indebtedness.

The 2022 Senior Notes and the Term Loan B Facility will be effectively subordinated to the obligations of any futurenon-guarantor subsidiaries.

We may be able to create futurenon-guarantor subsidiaries or unrestricted subsidiaries under the indenture governing the 2022 Senior2025 Notes. The 2025 Notes and the Term Loan B Facility. The 2022 Senior Notes and the Term Loan B Facility will not be guaranteed by any future unrestricted subsidiaries. Unrestricted subsidiaries may, among other things, incur without limitation additional indebtedness and liens, make investments and acquisitions, and sell assets or stock. In addition, we will be able to sell unrestricted subsidiaries, or distribute unrestricted subsidiaries or the proceeds from a sale of any of their assets or stock to stockholders, or enter into merger, joint venture or other transactions involving them, or any combination of the foregoing, without restrictions. Payments on the 2022 Senior2025 Notes and the Term Loan B Facility are only required to be made by us and the subsidiary guarantors. Accordingly, claims of holders of the 2022 Senior2025 Notes and the Term Loan B Facility are structurally subordinated to the claims of creditors of any subsidiary that is designated in the future as an “unrestricted subsidiary” or is a securitization subsidiary, in each case in accordance with the indenture, and any future subsidiaries that are not wholly-ownedwholly- owned by us, including trade creditors. All obligations of ournon-guarantor subsidiaries, including trade payables, will have to be satisfied before any of the assets of such subsidiary would be available for distribution, upon liquidation or otherwise, to us or a subsidiary guarantor.

We may be unable to raise funds necessary to finance the change of control repurchase offer required by the indenture governing the 2022 Senior2025 Notes.

If we experience specified changes of control, we would be required to make an offer to repurchase all of the 2022 Senior2025 Notes (unless otherwise redeemed) at a price equal to 101% of the principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the repurchase date. The occurrence of specified events that would constitute a change of control maycould constitute a default under any credit facility. Theour existing or future indebtedness. Such indebtedness under a credit facility would be immediately due and payable in an event of default, including due to a change of control. As a result, following a change of control event, we maywould not be able to repurchase 2022 Senior2025 Notes unless we first repay all indebtedness outstanding under such credit facilities and any of our other indebtedness that contains similarsuch provisions, or obtain a waiver from the holders of such indebtedness to permit us to repurchase the 2022 Senior2025 Notes. We may be unable to repay all of that indebtedness or obtain a waiver of that type.

Any requirement to offer to repurchase outstanding 2022 Senior2025 Notes may therefore require us to refinance our other outstanding debt, which we may not be able to do on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. In addition, our failure to purchase the 2022 Senior2025 Notes after a change of control in accordance with the terms of the indenture would constitute an event of default under the indenture, which in turn may result in a default under any credit facility.our other indebtedness.

Our inability to repay thecertain indebtedness under a credit facility will also constitute an event of default under the indenture governing the 2022 Senior2025 Notes, which could have materially adverse consequences to us and to the holders of the 2022 Senior Notes.our investors. In the event of a change of control, we cannot assure youprovide any assurance that we would have

sufficient assets to satisfy all of our obligations under any such credit facilityindebtedness and the 2022 Senior2025 Notes. If we are unable to fulfill such debt obligations it could materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

The international nature of our operations may make the outcome of any insolvency or bankruptcy proceedings or other exercise of remedies outside of bankruptcy difficult to predict.

We are incorporated under the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands and our subsidiaries are incorporated under the laws of Argentina, Brazil,the Republic of the Marshall Islands, Panama, Uruguay, Argentina, Paraguay, Brazil and Uruguay and certain other countries other than the United States,British Virgin Islands, and we conduct operations in countries around the world.South America. Consequently, in the event of any bankruptcy, insolvency or similar proceedings involving us or one of our subsidiaries, bankruptcy laws other than those of the United States could apply. We have limited operations or assets in the United States. If we become a debtor under the United StatesU.S. bankruptcy laws, bankruptcy courts in the United States may seek to assert jurisdiction over all of our assets, wherever located, including property situated in other countries. There can be no assurance, however, that we would become a debtor in the United States or that a United StatesU.S. bankruptcy court would be entitled to, or accept, jurisdiction over such bankruptcy case or that courts in other countries that have jurisdiction over us and our operations and assets would recognize a United States bankruptcy court’s jurisdiction if any other bankruptcy court would determine it had jurisdiction.

The 2022 Senior NotesFurther, in the event of a liquidation, bankruptcy or judicial reorganization in certain jurisdictions including Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay, certain statutory preferences, including post-petition claims, claims for salaries, wages, social security, taxes, court fees and expenses and claims secured by collateral, among others, will have preference over any other claims, including claims by any investor or creditor. In such event, enforcement of our obligations may be unsuccessful and the Term Loan B Facilityvalue of our common shares may deteriorate substantially or entirely.

The 2025 Notes are guaranteed by guarantors organized under the laws of different countries. The holders’ rights of the 2025 Noteholders under the guarantees are thus subject to the laws of these jurisdictions, and therewe can beprovide no assurance that the holders2025 Noteholders will be able to effectively enforce their rights in multiple bankruptcy, insolvency or similar proceedings.proceedings or outside of bankruptcy. Moreover, such multi-jurisdictional proceedings are typically complex and costly for creditors and often result in substantial uncertainty and delay in the enforcement of rights of holders.

In addition, the bankruptcy, insolvency, administrative, creditors right and other laws of the various jurisdictions of organization may be materially different from, or in conflict with or less favorable than, each other and those of the United States in certain areas, including creditors’ rights, priority of creditors, the ability to obtain post-petition interest, fees and expenses or adequate protection and the duration of the insolvency proceeding. The application of these various laws in multiple jurisdictions could trigger disputes over which jurisdiction’s law should apply and could adversely affect the ability of the holders of the 2022 Senior Notes and the lenders of the Term Loan B Facilityour outstanding indebtedness to enforce their rights and to collect payment on such indebtedness and materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Panama

Under Panamanian bankruptcy laws, Panamanian courts would not agree to hear any bankruptcy arising from activities in fullanother country other than Panama. If there is a bankruptcy proceeding against a Panamanian corporation operating in another country, it will be the bankruptcy courts of that country which will be competent to hear the bankruptcy proceeding.

Any judgment issued by a court of competent jurisdiction with respect to a Panamanian corporation operating outside Panama may be enforceable in Panama by registering such judgment with the Supreme Court in Panama.

Uruguay

Uruguayan courts are competent to consider bankruptcy cases where the debtor is domiciled in Uruguay, when the center of activity of the debtor is in Uruguay or when the debtor has or had an office, permanent establishment or exploitation in Uruguay.

If the guarantors, or any of the creditors of the guarantors, file a petition for bankruptcy in Uruguay, Uruguayan bankruptcy law will apply except for the impact of the bankruptcy declaration on the contracts that are validly governed by a foreign law.

Uruguayan and foreign creditors have the same treatment in case of bankruptcy, except in case of labor credits with general privilege which will receive preferential treatment over the assets of the debtor located in Uruguay.

Upon a court declaration of bankruptcy, all the debtor’s assets, either located within Uruguayan territory or abroad, will be placed under the 2022 Senior Notescontrol of a receiver to be appointed for the benefit of all creditors. In some cases, after a bankruptcy court declaration, the bankrupt party may continue to manage its assets with the supervision of a receiver. Otherwise, the receiver will run the business and manage the bankrupt party.

In addition to the above, certain transactions occurring prior to the declaration of bankruptcy may be found by the court to be null and void, such as:

In addition, upon the petition of the receiver (or in subsidy, by creditors representing 5% of the debtor’s total liabilities), the court may nullify transactions entered into up to two years prior to the entry into the bankruptcy if it is concluded that they were entered into with a malicious intent (fraud) to prevent creditors from satisfying their bona fide claims and the Term Loan B Facilitycontracting party knew or should have known that the party facing the bankruptcy was insolvent or had suspended payments on its obligations. In case of transaction with parties related to the debtor, the knowledge of the insolvency of the debtor by the contracting party is assumed. Companies of the same group are considered by bankruptcy law as related parties.

Clawback actions become time barred two years after the declaration of bankruptcy but there are other fraudulent conveyance actions available to creditors that are not subject to such statute of limitations.

Argentina

Under Argentine law, in the event that a guarantor becomes subject to a reorganization proceeding or to bankruptcy, the relevant guarantee, if granted within a maximum of two years before the date of declaration of bankruptcy or the date of initiation of the reorganization proceeding (if it is an indirect bankruptcy), may be deemed to have been a fraudulent transfer null and void if certain circumstances are met, such as the case in which the guarantor did not receive a fair consideration in exchange for the granting of such guarantee. The validity and enforceability of the guarantee granted by a guarantor that is an Argentine entity requires the guarantee to be granted in the best interest of the Argentine guarantor and that the Argentine guarantor is authorized by its by-laws to provide guarantees and receives fair and adequate consideration for the granting of the guarantee.

Argentine law establishes rankings of privileges and priorities among creditors in order to receive payment in a reorganization proceeding or bankruptcy subject to the nature and cause of their credits (claims for salaries, wages, social security contributions, taxes, among others, will take priority over any claims, both secured and unsecured).

In addition, under Argentine law, a guarantee is considered accessory to the principal obligation. Therefore, in case our underlying obligations under the 2025 Notes are declared null, the guarantees would, under Argentine law, be deemed to be null as well.

If proceedings were brought in the courts of Argentina seeking to enforce our obligations we would not be required to discharge its obligations in the original currency of the obligations. Any judgment obtained against us in Argentine courts in respect of any payment of our obligations could be discharged solely in Argentine pesos equivalent to the U.S. dollar amount of such payment at the official certain exchange rate. There can be no assurance that such rates of exchange will afford our investors or creditors full compensation of the amount invested in or loaned to us nor that the currency exchange regulations will permit investors or creditors to convert any amount of Argentine pesos received into U.S. dollars. See “—Risks Relating to Argentina—The current and future foreign exchange policy of Argentina may affect the ability of our Argentine subsidiary to make money remittances outside of Argentina.”

Paraguay

Bankruptcy proceedings in Paraguay may be less favorable to holders of our 2025 Notes than in other jurisdictions. For example, Paraguayan creditors receive preferential treatment, which means that creditors resident in Paraguay would receive payments prior to any payment being made on the guarantees. Furthermore, the obligations under the guarantees would be subordinated to certain statutory preferences such as maritime privileges, amongst which are claims for salaries, wages, taxes, port facilities and others.

Brazil

Brazilian legal framework for economically distressed companies or individuals generally consists of the provisions set forth by the Brazilian Bankruptcy and Reorganization Federal Law (“BBRL”—Law No. 11101, dated February 9, 2005)2005, as amended by the newly enacted Federal Law 14,112/2020, sets out the rules for bankruptcy and insolvency in Brazil). The BBRL contains certain provisions that resemble bankruptcy under U.S. Chapters 11 and 7. It regulates two different situations: (i) reorganization, that may take place (a) in court (judicial reorganization) or (b) out of court (extrajudicial reorganization), both aiming at surpassing debtor’s financial distress; and (ii) bankruptcy, which is intended to liquidate the company and its assets and must be always administered by a judicial court.court appointed trustee.

A bankruptcy request can be filed by the company itself, its shareholders or partners, or any of its creditors. BBRL lists the events upon which bankruptcy may be requested by a company’s creditors, including the following: (i) failure to provide payment of any liquid obligation when owed in a credit instrument in an amount higher than 40 minimum monthly wages; (ii) arbitrarily anticipate the liquidation of assets or making payment in a damaging or fraudulent way; (iii) simulatedfraudulent deal or sale of all or substantially all assets to a third party, creditor or otherwise, attempted or actually performed; and (iv) transfer of establishment to third parties, creditors or otherwise, without the consent of all other creditors and without keeping sufficient assets to fulfill its obligations; and (v) failure to provide payment or assets to guarantee liquid obligations owed in a judicial enforcement proceeding.obligations. A bankruptcy order entails two important matters concerning credits: (i) acceleration of all company indebtedness, and (ii) conversion of foreign currency-denominated debts into national currency ones.

Any judgment obtained against us in Brazilian courts in respect of any payment obligations under the guarantees normally would be expressed in the Brazilian currency equivalent of the U.S. dollar amount of such sum at the exchange rate in effect (i) on the date of actual payment, (ii) on the date on which such judgment is rendered, or (iii) on the date on which collection or enforcement proceedings are started against us. Consequently, in the event of bankruptcy, all of our debt obligations that are denominated in foreign currency including the guarantees, will be converted into Brazilian currency at the prevailing exchange rate on the date of declaration of our bankruptcy by the court. We cannot assure to holders of our 2022 Senior Notes andIn bankruptcy proceedings, creditors would be paid in accordance with the lenders ofpriority rule set forth by the Term Loan B Facility that such rate of exchange will afford full compensation of the amount due on the 2022 Senior Notes and the Term Loan B Facility.BBRL. Finally, payments under bankruptcy proceedings in Brazil usually take from fiveoccur two to 12 years after the filing of the proceeding, and generally the assets are generally not sufficient to pay off the creditors.

Panama

Under Panamanian bankruptcy laws, Panamanian courts would not agree to hear any bankruptcy arising from activities in another country other than Panama. If there is a bankruptcy proceeding against a Panamanian corporation operating in another country, it will be the bankruptcy courts of that country which will be competent to hear the bankruptcy proceeding.

Any judgment issued by a court of competent jurisdiction with respect to a Panamanian corporation operating outside Panama may be enforceable in Panama by registering such judgment with the Supreme Court in Panama.

Paraguay

Bankruptcy proceedings in Paraguay may be less favorable to holders of our 2022 Senior Notes and the lenders of the Term Loan B Facility than in other jurisdictions. For example, Paraguayan creditors receive preferential treatment, which means that creditors resident in Paraguay would receive payments prior to any payment being made on the guarantees. Furthermore, the obligations under the guarantees would be subordinated to certain statutory preferences such as maritime privileges, amongst which are claims for salaries, wages, taxes, port facilities and others.

Uruguay

Uruguayan courts shall have jurisdiction to declare bankruptcy when:

If the guarantors, or any of the creditors of the guarantors, file a petition for bankruptcy in Uruguay, Uruguayan bankruptcy law will apply except for the impact of the bankruptcy declaration on the contracts that are governed by a foreign law.

Upon a court declaration of bankruptcy, all the debtor’s assets, either located within Uruguayan territory or abroad, shall be placed under the control of a receiver to be appointed for the benefit of all creditors. However, if the debtor has also been declared bankrupt in the country where it had its domicile or effective place of business; the Uruguayan bankruptcy will only include the remaining assets or rights located abroad once the foreign bankruptcy procedure is concluded.

In some cases, after a bankruptcy court declaration, the bankrupt party may continue to manage its assets with the cooperation of a receiver. Otherwise, the receiver will run the business and manage the bankrupt party.

In addition to the above, certain transactions occurring prior to the declaration of bankruptcy may be found by the court to be null and void, or may be declared null and void by the court after an examination of the merits, as follows:

In addition, upon the petition of an interested party, the court may nullify transactions entered into up to two years prior to the entry into the bankruptcy if it is concluded that they were entered into with a malicious intent (fraud) to prevent creditors from satisfying their bona fide claims and the contracting party knew or should have known that the party facing the bankruptcy was insolvent or had suspended payments on its obligations.

Claw back actions become time barred two years after the declaration of bankruptcy.

Argentina

Under Argentine law, in the event that a guarantor becomes subject to a reorganization proceeding or to bankruptcy, the relevant guarantee, if granted within two years before the declaration of bankruptcy, may be deemed to have been a fraudulent transfer and declared void, if the guarantor did not receive a fair consideration in exchange for the granting of such guarantee. The validity and enforceability of the guarantee granted by a guarantor that is an Argentine entity requires the guarantee to be granted in the best interest of the Argentine guarantor and that the Argentine guarantor receives fair and adequate consideration for the granting of the guarantees.

In addition, under Argentine law, a guarantee is considered accessory to the principal obligation. Therefore, in case our underlying obligations under the 2022 Senior Notes or the indenture and the Term Loan B Facility are declared null, the guarantees would, under Argentine law, be deemed to be null as well.

If proceedings were brought in the courts of Argentina seeking to enforce the Argentine guarantor’s obligations under the 2022 Senior Notes and the Term Loan B Facility, the Argentine guarantor would not be required to discharge its obligations in the original currency of the 2022 Senior Notes and the Term Loan B Facility. Any judgment obtained against the Argentine guarantor in Argentine courts in respect of any payment obligations under the 2022 Senior Notes and the Term Loan B Facility could be discharged solely in Argentine pesos equivalent to the U.S. dollar amount of such payment at a certain exchange rate. There can be no assurance that such rates of exchange will afford our noteholders full compensation of the amount invested in the 2022 Senior Notes and the Term Loan B Facility plus accrued interest nor that the currency exchange regulations will permit the noteholders to convert any amount of Argentine pesos received into U.S. dollars (please refer to paragraph entitled “Foreign exchange policies implemented by the Argentine government in the past have limited, and if implemented again, could continue to limit the ability of the guarantors of the 2022 Senior Notes that and the Term Loan B Facility are Argentine companies to make money remittances outside of Argentina in respect of the guarantees”).

Certain requirements must be met for the recognition and enforceability of a foreign judgment by courts outside the United States.

Argentina

ForeignMost of our directors and officers, selling shareholders and experts reside outside the United States, and most of their assets are located outside the United States. As a result, it may be difficult to effect service of process within the United States upon these persons or to enforce outside the United States judgments would be recognized and enforced byobtained against us or these persons in U.S. courts, including judgments in actions predicated upon the courts in Argentina provided that the requirements of Article 517civil liability provisions of the Federal Civil and Commercial Procedure Code (if enforcement is sought before federal courts) are met. These requirements include (1) the judgment, which must be final in the jurisdiction where rendered, must have been issued by a court competent pursuant to Argentine principles regarding international jurisdiction and must have resulted from a personal action, or anin rem action with respect to personal property

if such property was transferred to Argentine territory during or after the prosecution of the foreign action, (2) the defendant against whom enforcement of the judgment is sought must have been personally served with the summons and, in accordance with due process of law, must have been given an opportunity to defend against such foreign action, (3) the judgment must be valid in the jurisdiction where rendered and its authenticity must be established in accordance with the requirements of Argentine law, (4) the judgment must not violate the principles of public policy of Argentine law, and (5) the judgment must not be contrary to a prior or simultaneous judgment of an Argentine court.

We have been advised that there is doubt as to the enforceability in Argentina, in original actions or in actions for enforcement of judgments of United States courts, of civil liabilities predicated solely upon theU.S. federal securities laws, or to otherwise bring original actions in foreign courts to enforce such liabilities. Likewise, it may also be difficult to enforce judgments obtained in non-U.S. courts against us or against these persons, in U.S. court, including judgments obtained in actions predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the United States.

Moreover,U.S. federal securities laws. It may also be difficult for an investor to bring an action in a Brazilian court costs, including (without limitation) filings fees and deposits to secure judgments, andpredicated upon the paymentcivil liability provisions of stamp taxesthe U.S. federal securities laws against us or these persons. Although a person may be required by the competent authorities in Argentina in case a foreign judgment has effects in Argentina, upon, for instance,re-litigation, enforcementbring an original or registration of such judgment in Argentina.

Brazil

Judgments of Brazilian courts enforcing obligations under the guarantees would be payable only in Brazilian currency. If proceedings were broughtderivative action against us or our affiliates in the courts of Brazil seeking to enforce the obligations under the guarantees, we would not be required to discharge our obligations in a currency other than Brazilian currency. Any judgment obtained against us in Brazilian courts in respect of any payment obligations under the guarantees would be expressed in Brazilian currency. We cannot assure you that this amount in Brazilian currency will afford you full compensationRepublic of the amount sought in any such litigation.

Certain requirements must be met for the recognitionMarshall Islands, and enforceability of foreign judgments in Brazil. Subject to the following, a final and conclusive judgment for civil liabilities rendered by any court in the United States or elsewhere in respect of the 2022 Senior Notes and the Term Loan B Facility and the guarantees would be recognized in the courts of Brazil (to the extent that Brazilian courts have jurisdiction) and such courts would enforce such judgment without any retrial or reexaminationRepublic of the meritsMarshall Islands may impose civil liability, including monetary damages, against us or our affiliates for a cause of action arising under Republic of the original action only if such judgment has been previously ratified by the Brazilian Superior Court of Justice (Superior Tribunal de Justiça) with such ratification being subject to:Marshall Islands law, it may impracticable for an individual investor to do so.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, no assurance can be given that such ratification would be obtained, that the process described above would be conducted in a timely manner or that a Brazilian court would enforce a monetary judgment for violation of the U.S. securities laws with respect to the 2022 Senior Notes and the Term Loan B Facility and the guarantees. In addition:

For the purposes of enforcement and collection in Uruguay, the request for recognition (“exequatur”) shall be first filed before the Supreme Court of Justice in Uruguay, who shall verify compliance with the aforementioned requirements. Service of notice shall be given on the defendant who will have 20 days to file its objection to the application for recognition. The Supreme Court’s decision shall be final and cannot be challenged later.

If enforcement is granted, the file will be sent to the competent lower court to carry out proceedings for enforcement and collection. Upon completion of the Exequatur proceeding as described above, it will be possible to enforce the guarantees against each of the Uruguayan subsidiaries,judgment, without the need to appoint any agent for service of process.

Argentina

A final and conclusive foreign judgment would be recognized and enforced by the courts in Argentina without any retrial or re-examination of the merits of the original action provided that the requirements of Articles 517 through 519 of the Argentine National Code of Civil and Commercial Procedures (if enforcement is sought before federal courts) are met. These requirements include: (1) the judgment, which must be final in the jurisdiction where rendered, must have been issued by a court competent pursuant to Argentine principles regarding international jurisdiction and must have resulted from a personal action, or an in rem action with respect to personal property if such property was transferred to Argentine territory during or after the prosecution of the foreign action, (2) the defendant against whom enforcement of the judgment is sought must have been personally served with the summons and, in accordance with due process of law, must have been given an opportunity to defend against such foreign action, (3) the judgment must be valid in the jurisdiction where rendered and its authenticity must be established in accordance with the requirements of Argentine law, (4) the judgment must not violate the principles of public policy of Argentine law, and (5) the judgment must not be contrary to a prior or simultaneous judgment of an Argentine court. There might be other requirements set forth by laws that replace or complement the National Code of Civil and Commercial Procedures in the future. If the enforcement is sought before provincial courts, other requirements may apply through application of the corresponding provincial codes of procedures.

In addition, Article 2609 of the Argentine Civil and Commercial Code, sets forth the exclusive jurisdiction of Argentine courts on disputes related to (i) rights in rem over real estate located in Argentina, (ii) validity or nullity of registrations performed before an Argentine public registry, and (iii) registration and validity of intellectual property rights.

We have been advised that there is doubt as to the enforceability in Argentina, in original actions or in actions for enforcement of judgments of United States courts, of civil liabilities predicated solely upon the federal securities laws of the United States.

Moreover, court costs, including (without limitation) filings fees and deposits to secure judgments, and the payment of stamp taxes may be required by the competent authorities in Argentina in case a foreign judgment has effects in Argentina, upon, for instance, re-litigation, enforcement or registration of such judgment in Argentina.

Paraguay

Foreign judgments have force in Paraguay provided that: (1) the judgment was obtained in an action in personam; (2) the defendant must have been personally served with the summons and given an opportunity to defend against foreign action (3) the obligation on which the action was based is valid in accordance with Paraguay’s law; (4) the decision is final; (5) proper certification and legalization is complied with in accordance with Paraguay law; (6) the judgment has not been pronounced by default of condemned party; (7) the judgment does not violate Paraguayan law principles of public policy, and (8) the judgment is not contrary to a prior or simultaneous judgment by a Paraguayan court.

Brazil

Judgments of Brazilian courts enforcing obligations under the guarantees would be payable only in Brazilian currency. If a plaintiff were to bring proceedings against us in the courts of Brazil seeking to enforce the obligations under the guarantees, we would not be required to discharge our obligations in a currency other than Brazilian currency. Any judgment obtained against us in Brazilian courts in respect of any payment obligations under the guarantees would be payable in Brazilian currency. We cannot provide any assurance that this amount in Brazilian currency will afford a plaintiff full compensation of the amount sought in any such litigation.

Certain requirements must be met for the recognition and enforceability of foreign judgments in Brazil. Subject to the following, a final and conclusive judgment for civil liabilities rendered by any court in the United States or elsewhere would be recognized in the courts of Brazil (to the extent that Brazilian courts have jurisdiction) and such courts would enforce such judgment without any retrial or reexamination of the merits of the original action only if such judgment has been previously ratified by the Brazilian Superior Court of Justice (Superior Tribunal de Justica), such ratification being subject to:

Notwithstanding the foregoing, no assurance can be given that such ratification would be obtained, that the process described above would be conducted in a timely manner or that a Brazilian court would enforce a monetary judgment for violation of the U.S. securities laws. In addition:

In addition, a plaintiff, whether Brazilian or non-Brazilian, who resides outside Brazil or is outside Brazil during the course of litigation in Brazil and who does not own real property in Brazil must grant a pledge to guarantee the payment of the defendant’s legal fees and court expenses related to court procedures. This pledge must be in an amount sufficient to satisfy the payment of court fees and defendant’s attorneys’ fees, as determined by the Brazilian judge. This requirement will not apply (1) when an exemption is provided by an international agreement or treaty that Brazil is a signatory to; (2) in the case of claims for collection relating to an instrument which may be enforced in Brazilian courts without a review on the merits (titulo executivo extrajudicial); (3) in the case of enforcement of foreign judgments that have been duly recognized by the Brazilian Superior Court of Justice (Superior Tribunal de Justica); or (4) counterclaims as established according to Article 83 of the Brazilian Code of Civil Procedure.

Obligations under the guarantees are subordinated to certain statutory preferences.

The obligations under the guarantees are subordinated to certain statutory preferences. In the event of a liquidation, bankruptcy or judicial reorganization in certain jurisdictions including Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay, such statutory preferences, including post-petition claims, claims for salaries, wages, social security, taxes, court fees and expenses and claims secured by collateral, among others, will have preference over any other claims, including claims by any investor in respect of the guarantees. In such event, enforcement of the guarantees may be unsuccessful, and noteholders may be unable to collect amounts that they are due under the 2022 Senior2025 Notes.

The 2025 Notes and the Term Loan B Facility .

Our beingare subject to certain fraudulent transfer and conveyance statutes, which may have adverse implications for the holders of the 2022 Senior Notes and the lenders of the Term Loan B Facility.2025 Notes.

Fraudulent transfer and insolvency laws may void, subordinate or limit the 2022 Senior Notes and the guarantees and the Term Loan B Facility .

Marshall Islands

We and somerights of the guarantors asholders of the issue date are organized under the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands. While the Republic of the Marshall Islands does not have a bankruptcy statute or general statutory mechanism for insolvency proceedings, a Marshall Islands court could apply general U.S. principles of fraudulent conveyance, discussed below, in light of the provisions of the Marshall Islands Business Corporations Act, or the BCA, restricting the grant of guarantees without a corporate purpose. In such case, a Marshall Islands court could void or subordinate the 2022 Senior Notes and the Term Loan B Facility or the guarantees, including for the reasons a U.S. court could void or subordinate a guarantee as described below.2025 Notes.

United States

Federal and state fraudulent transfer and conveyance statutes may apply to the issuance of the 2022 Senior2025 Notes and the Term Loan B Facility and the incurrence of the guarantees, particularly any future guarantees of any U.S. subsidiaries we might create. Under U.S. federal bankruptcy law and comparable provisions of U.S. state fraudulent transfer or conveyance laws, if any such law would be deemed to apply, which may vary from state to state, the 2022 Senior2025 Notes and the Term Loan B Facility or the guarantees could be voided as a fraudulent