As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 26, 201930, 2020

 

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM20-F

 

 

 

REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR 12(g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

 

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBERFor the fiscal year ended December 31, 20182019

OR

 

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

 

SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number:001-15256

 

 

Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

 

N/A The Federative Republic of Brazil
(Translation of Registrant’s Name into English) (Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)

Rua Humberto de Campos, 425

Leblon, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil22430-190

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

Carlos Augusto Machado Pereira de Almeida BrandãoCamille Loyo Faria

Investor Relations Officer

Rua Humberto de Campos, 425

8º andar

Leblon, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil22430-190

Tel: +55 21 3131-2918

invest@oi.net.br

(Name, Telephone,E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of Each Class

  

Trading Symbol

Name of Each Exchange on which Registered

Common Shares, without par value, each represented by

American Depositary Shares

  

OIBR.C

New York Stock Exchange

 

 

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Preferred Shares, without par value, each represented by American Depositary Shares

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act: None

The total number of issued and outstanding shares of each class of stock of Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization as of December 31, 20182019 was:

2,266,216,0245,764,447,760 common shares, without par value

155,915,486155,727,241 preferred shares, without par value

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes     No 

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.    Yes ☐    No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes ☒    No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of RegulationS-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒    No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or anon-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” inRule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer      Acceleratedfiler      Non-accelerated filer  ☐

Emerging growth company  ☐

If an emerging growth company that prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards† provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  ☐

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

 

U.S. GAAP  

 

International Financial Reporting Standards as issued

by the International Accounting Standards Board  

 

Other  ☐

If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.    ☐ Item 17    ☐ Item 18

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined inRule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes ☐    No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.    Yes ☒    No ☐

 

 

 


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

   

Page

PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL AND OTHER INFORMATION

 1

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT WITH RESPECT TOFORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

6
PART I 7

PART I

 8

Item  1.   Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers

  87

Item 2.   Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable

  87

Item 3.   Key Information

  87

Item 4.   Information on the Company

  3228

Item 4A.   Unresolved Staff Comments

  8069

Item  5.   Operating and Financial Review and Prospects

  8070

Item  6.   Directors, Senior Management and Employees

  115112

Item  7.   Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions

  129126

Item 8.   Financial Information

  136131

Item 9.   The Offer and Listing

  148140

Item 10.   Additional Information

  153143

Item  11.   Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

  173169

Item  12.   Description of Securities Other Than Equity Securities

  174170

PART II

  175171

Item  13.   Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies

  175171

Item  14.   Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds

  175171

Item 15.   Controls and Procedures

  175171

Item 16A.   Audit Committee Financial Expert

  177172

Item 16B.   Code of Ethics

  178172

Item 16C.   Principal Accountant Fees and Services

  178173

Item  16D.   Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees

  179173

Item  16E. Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

  179173

Item  16F.  Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant

  179174

Item 16G.   Corporate Governance

  180174

Item 16H.   Mine Safety Disclosure

  182176

PART III

  183177

Item 17.   Financial Statements

  183177

Item 18.   Financial Statements

  183177

Item 19.   Exhibits

  183177

SIGNATURES

  185179

 

 

i


PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL AND OTHER INFORMATION

All references herein to “real,” “reais” or “R$” are to the Brazilianreal, the official currency of Brazil. All references to “U.S. dollars,” “dollars” or “US$” are to U.S. dollars.

Financial Statements

We maintain our books and records inreais. Our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 and as of and for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, and the related notes thereto, which we refer to as our audited consolidated financial statements, are included in this annual report.

We have prepared our audited consolidated financial statements in accordance with the International Financial Reporting Standards, or IFRS, as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, or the IASB, under the assumption that we will continue as a going concern and in compliance with the legal requirements applicable to a judicial reorganization. Our audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 and for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 have been audited in accordance with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or PCAOB, standards.

The RJ Proceedings are aimed at ensuring the continuation of our company as a going concern. This continuity was strengthened with the approval of the RJ Plan and, as a result, the borrowings and financing were novated and the related balances were recalculated under the terms and conditions of the RJ Plan. The continuity of our company as a going concern is ultimately depending on the successful outcome of the RJ Proceedings and the realization of other forecasts of our company.

Our company has been successfully discharging the obligations set forth in the RJ Proceedings and even though there are no indications in this regard, we emphasize that these conditions and circumstances indicate, by their own nature, uncertainties that may affect the success of the RJ Proceedings and possibly cast doubts as to our ability to continue as a going concern. As at December 31, 2019 and after the implementation of the RJ Plan, total shareholders’ equity was R$17,797 million, loss for the year then ended was R$9,095 million, and working capital (consisting of current assets less current liabilities) totaled R$6,157 million. As at December 31, 2018 and after the recognition of the effects of the RJ Plan, total shareholders’ equity was R$22,896 million, profit for the year then ended was R$24,616 million, and working capital totaled R$10,624 million.

Since December 2019, a novel strain of coronavirus(SARS-CoV-2, referred to as“COVID-19”) has spread throughout the world. On January 31, 2020, the World Health Organization announced thatCOVID-19 was a global health emergency and on March 3, 2020, the World Health Organization categorizedCOVID-19 as a pandemic.

As of the date of this annual report, we have not been able to quantify any material impacts related toCOVID-19 and it is too soon to accurately determine the extent of its medium- and long-term impacts on the global and Brazilian economic scenarios. However, as it is not possible yet to predict the duration and effects of this crisis, there is a risk of material impacts on our operations and sales, particularly ourfiber-to-the-home network expansion. For more details see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Principal Factors Affecting Our Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Potential Effects of theCOVID-19 Pandemic.”

Additionally, our debt instruments with BNDES contain financial covenants that require Oi to maintain five specified financial ratios, measured on a quarterly basis. Under these debt instruments, BNDES has the right to accelerate the debt if, at the date the financial covenants are tested, we are not in compliance with any two of these ratios. At December 31, 2019, we were in compliance with these financial covenants.

As a result of the depreciation of thereal subsequent to December 31, 2019, partially due to theCOVID-19 pandemic and the public health measures adopted to combat the pandemic in Brazil and internationally, and the related effects on our U.S. dollar-denominated indebtedness and interest expenses, we believed that it was probable that as of March 31, 2020, we would not be in compliance with more than one of these financial ratios. In anticipation of these ratio breaches, on March 30, 2020 we obtained a waiver from BNDES.

For our fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, we included financial statements prepared under IFRS as part of our annual report on Form20-F, applying IFRS 1, “First-time Adoption of International Reporting Standards,” considering that our previous primary GAAP was Brazilian GAAP and that January 1, 2009 was the date of transition to IFRS. Consequently, as we are not an IFRS first-time adopter, we have included a reconciliation from U.S. GAAP to IFRS for the comparative balance sheet (i.e., as of December 31, 2018) and comparative income statement periods preceding the most recent fiscal year (i.e., for the year ended December 31, 2018) in our audited consolidated financial statements to present the changes in the basis of presentation.

We are also required to prepare financial statements in accordance with accounting practices adopted in Brazil, or Brazilian GAAP, which are based on:

the Brazilian Corporate Law (as defined below);

the rules and regulations of the Brazilian Securities Commission (Comissão de Valores Mobiliários), or the CVM, and the Brazilian Federal Accounting Council (Conselho Federal de Contabilidade); and

the accounting standards issued by the Brazilian Accounting Pronouncements Committee (Comitê de Pronunciamentos Contábeis).

Certain Defined Terms

General

Unless otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires, all references to:

“our company,” “we,” “our,” “ours,” “us” or similar terms are to Oi and its consolidated subsidiaries;

“ADSs” are to Common ADSs and Preferred ADSs;

“Africatel” are to Africatel Holdings B.V., an indirect subsidiary of Oi of which Oi’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Africatel GmbH & Co KG, holds 86% of the equity stock;

“ANATEL” are to the Brazilian National Telecommunications Agency (Agência Nacional de Telecomunicações);

“Bratel” are to Bratel S.à r.l.;

“Brazil” are to the Federative Republic of Brazil;

“Brazilian Corporate Law” are to, collectively, Brazilian Law No. 6,404/76, as amended;

“Brazilian government” are to the federal government of the Federative Republic of Brazil;

“Common ADSs” are to American Depositary Shares, each representing five Common Shares;

“Common Shares” are to common shares of Oi;

“Copart 4” are to Copart 4 Participações S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Oi prior to its merger with and into Telemar in January 2019;

“Copart 5” are to Copart 5 Participações S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of Oi prior to its merger with and into Oi in March 2019;

“Oi” are to Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization;

“Oi Coop” are to Oi Brasil Holdings Coöperatief U.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of Oi;

“Oi Mobile” are to Oi Móvel S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Oi;

“Pharol” are to Pharol, SGPS, S.A. (formerly known as Portugal Telecom, SGPS, S.A.);

“Preferred ADSs” are to American Depositary Shares, each representing one Preferred Share;

“Preferred Shares” are to preferred shares of Oi;

“PTIF” are to Portugal Telecom International Finance B.V. – In Judicial Reorganization, a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of Oi, which PT Portugal transferred to us in anticipation of our sale of PT Portugal in 2015;

“PT Portugal” are to PT Portugal, SGPS, S.A., which we acquired on May 5, 2014 and sold on June 2, 2015;

“Telemar” are to Telemar Norte Leste S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of Oi;

“TmarPart” are to Telemar Participações S.A., which, prior to the capital increase of Oi on May 5, 2014, was the direct controlling shareholder of Oi and which merged with and into Oi on September 1, 2015; and

“TNL” are to Tele Norte Leste Participações S.A., a company that was directly controlled by TmarPart prior to its merger with and into Oi on February 27, 2012.

Judicial Reorganization

The following defined terms relate to our global judicial reorganization. For more information, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—Our Recent History and Development—Our Judicial Reorganization Proceedings.” Unless otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires, all references to:

“ADWs” are to American Depositary Warrants;

“Brazilian Bankruptcy Law” are to Brazilian Law No. 11,101 of June 9, 2005;

“Brazilian Confirmation Date” are to February 5, 2018, the date in which the Brazilian Confirmation Order was published in the Official Gazette of the State of Rio de Janeiro (Diário Oficial do Estado do Rio de Janeiro);

“Brazilian Confirmation Order” are to the order entered by the RJ Court on January 8, 2018, ratifying and confirming the RJ Plan, but modifying certain provisions of the RJ Plan;

“Capitalization of Credits Capital Increase” are to the capital increase of R$10,600,097,221.00 through the issuance of 1,514,299,603 newly issued Common Shares and 116,480,467 Warrants, paid for by conversion of claims of holders of beneficial interests in the bonds issued by Oi, Oi Coop and PTIF that individualized their unsecured claims evidenced by bonds issued by Oi, Oi Coop and PTIF in accordance with the procedures established in the RJ Plan and by the RJ Court with unsecured claims greater than US$750,000.00 (or the equivalent in other currencies) into Common Shares of Oi, pursuant to Section 4.3.3.5 of the RJ Plan;

“Default Recovery” are to the general treatment provided for unsecured credits under the RJ Plan;

“Defaulted Bonds” are to the bonds issued by Oi, Oi Coop and PTIF that were outstanding on the date of the commencement of the RJ Proceedings;

“GCM” are to a General Creditors’ Meeting of creditors of our company recognized by the RJ Court. A GCM was held on December 19 and 20, 2017 to consider and vote on the RJ Plan;

“RJ Court” are to the 7th Commercial Court of the Judicial District of the State Capital of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The RJ Court is adjudicating the judicial reorganization proceedings in Brazil involving the RJ Debtors;

“RJ Debtors” are to Oi, Telemar, Oi Mobile, Oi Coop, PTIF, Copart 4 and Copart 5;

“RJ Plan” are to the judicial reorganization plan, as amended, of the RJ Debtors that was filed with the RJ Court and, on December 20, 2017, approved by a significant majority of creditors of each class present at the GCM held on December 19 and 20, 2017;

“RJ Proceedings” are to the Brazilian proceedings for judicial reorganization (recuperação judicial) involving the RJ Debtors that are being adjudicated by the RJ Court, pursuant to a joint voluntary petition for judicial reorganization pursuant to the Brazilian Bankruptcy Law filed by the RJ Debtors with the RJ Court initially on June 20, 2016. On June 29, 2016, the RJ Court granted the processing of the RJ Proceedings of the RJ Debtors; and

“Warrants” are to warrants (bonus de subscrição) to acquire newly issued Common Shares of Oi, which Warrants may distributed in the form of American Depository Warrants, as further described in Section 4.3.3.6 of the RJ Plan.

Financial Restructuring

In June 2016, after considering the challenges arising from our economic and financial situation in connection with the maturity schedule of our financial debts, the threats to our cash flows represented by imminent attachments or freezing of assets in judicial lawsuits, and the urgent need to adopt measures that protect our company, we concluded that filing of a request for judicial reorganization (recuperação judicial) in Brazil would be the most appropriate course of action (1) to preserve the continuity of our offering of quality services to our customers, within the rules and commitments undertaken with ANATEL, (2) to preserve the value of our company, (3) to maintain the continuity of our operations and corporate activities in an organized manner that protects the interests of our company, customers, shareholders and other stakeholders, and (4) to protect our cash and cash equivalents.

On June 20, 2016, Oi, together with the other RJ Debtors, filed a joint voluntary petition for judicial reorganization pursuant to the Brazilian Bankruptcy Law with the RJ Court, pursuant to an urgent measure approved by our board of directors.

On December 19 and 20, 2017, a GCM was held to consider approval of the RJ Plan. This GCM concluded on December 20, 2017 following the approval of the RJ Plan reflecting amendments to the RJ Plan presented at this GCM as negotiated during the course of this GCM.

On January 8, 2018, the RJ Court entered the Brazilian Confirmation Order, ratifying and confirming the RJ Plan, according to its terms, but modifying certain provisions of the RJ Plan. The Brazilian Confirmation Order was published in the Official Gazette of the State of Rio de Janeiro on February 5, 2018, the Brazilian Confirmation Date.

The Brazilian Confirmation Order, according to its terms, is binding on all parties as long as its effects are not stayed. By operation of the RJ Plan and the Brazilian Confirmation Order, the unsecured claims against the RJ Debtors have been novated and discharged under Brazilian law and holders of such claims have received the recoveries set forth in the RJ Plan in exchange for their claims in accordance with the terms and conditions of the RJ Plan. For more information regarding the RJ Proceedings, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—Our Recent History and Development—Our Judicial Reorganization Proceedings.”

During 2018, the restructuring of the RJ Debtor’s financial debt in accordance with the applicable terms and conditions set forth in the RJ Plan was concluded.

In January 2019, we completed a preemptive offering of Common Shares as contemplated by Section 6 of the RJ Plan under which we issued and sold 3,225,806,451 Common Shares for an aggregate purchase price of R$4,000 million.

The Brazilian Bankruptcy Law provides that the RJ Proceedings and the judicial supervision of the RJ Debtors may be terminated on the second anniversary of the Brazilian Confirmation Date if the RJ Court determines that all obligations provided for in the RJ Plan have been satisfied based on the analysis of compliance with the RJ Plan.

On December 6, 2019, we filed a petition with the RJ Court requesting that the judicial supervision of the RJ Debtors not be terminated on February 5, 2020, the second anniversary of the Brazilian Confirmation Date, in order to allow us to continue to execute the RJ Plan and remain focused on our strategic transformation. Notwithstanding the conclusion of the restructuring of the RJ Debtor’s financial debt in accordance with the applicable terms and conditions set forth in the RJ Plan, we presented to the RJ Court circumstances related to the complexity inherent to the magnitude of the RJ Proceedings and the ongoing reforms in the legal-regulatory environment, which we believe require additional measures yet to be implemented under the RJ Proceedings.

On February 27, 2020, we filed a petition with the RJ Court requesting that we be permitted to submit to our creditors for their consideration and deliberation at a new general creditors’ meeting a proposed amendment to the RJ Plan designed to achieve greater operational and financial flexibility for our company to continue with investments and the fulfillment of our strategic plan. At the new general creditors’ meeting, only creditors of the RJ Debtors that held credits and had voting rights at the time of the original GCM and who continued to hold an interest in the debt obligations or equity securities of the RJ Debtors on February 27, 2020 will be entitled to vote.

On March 6, 2020, the RJ Court issued a decision granting our request to hold a new general creditors’ meeting to deliberate on a proposed amendment to the RJ Plan. The RJ Court required that:

the RJ Debtors must submit the proposed amendment to the RJ Plan to the RJ Court on or prior to September 8, 2020; and

the new general creditors’ meeting organized by Escritório de Advocacia Arnoldo Wald e Advogados Associados, the judicial administrator of the RJ Debtors, or the Judicial Administrator, must take place within 60 days from the date of submission of the proposed amendment to the RJ Plan to the RJ Court by the RJ Debtors.

We intend to seek to amend the RJ Plan in order to facilitate asset sales contemplated by our strategic plan, including the potential sale of our mobile business and the proposed sales of othernon-core assets. We continue to discuss the terms of the proposed amendment with various constituencies of our company and can provide no assurances with respect to the specific terms of the proposed amendment that will be presented to the RJ Court.

Market Share and Other Information

We make statements in this annual report about our market share and other information relating to the telecommunications industry in Brazil. We have made these statements on the basis of information obtained from third-party sources and publicly available information that we believe are reliable, such as information and reports from ANATEL, among others. Notwithstanding any investigation that we may have conducted with respect to the market share, market size or similar data provided by third parties or derived from industry or general publications, we assume no responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of any such information.

Rounding

We have made rounding adjustments to reach some of the figures included in this annual report. As a result, numerical figures shown as totals in some tables may not be arithmetic aggregations of the figures that precede them.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT WITH RESPECT TO FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This annual report contains forward-looking statements. Some of the matters discussed concerning our business operations and financial performance include forward-looking statements within the meaning of the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, or the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act.

Statements that are predictive in nature, that depend upon or refer to future events or conditions or that include words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “estimates” and similar expressions are forward-looking statements. Although we believe that these forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions, these statements are subject to several risks and uncertainties and are made in light of information currently available to us.

Many important factors could cause our actual results to differ substantially from those anticipated in our forward-looking statements, including, among other things:

material adverse changes in economic conditions in Brazil or the other countries in which we have operations and investments;

the Brazilian government’s telecommunications policies that affect the telecommunications industry and our business in Brazil in general, including issues relating to the remuneration for the use of our network in Brazil, and changes in or developments of ANATEL regulations applicable to us;

the cost and availability of financing;

any judicial action that overturns or modifies the Brazilian Confirmation Order or declares the RJ Debtors bankrupt under Brazilian law and requires their liquidation;

the effects of intense competition in Brazil and the other countries in which we have operations and investments;

the general level of demand for, and changes in the market prices of, our services;

our ability to implement our corporate strategies in order to expand our customer base and increase our average revenue per user;

political, regulatory and economic conditions in Brazil, notably with respect to inflation, exchange rate fluctuation of thereal,interest rates fluctuation and the political environment in Brazil;

the adverse effects ofCOVID-19, and public health measures adopted to combat the pandemic in Brazil and internationally, on our employees, our business operations (including our retail operations, our network operations, our network maintenance programs and our expansion programs), our third-party vendors and the ability of our customers to pay for services on a timely basis;

the outcomes of legal and administrative proceedings to which we are or become a party;

changes in telecommunications technology that could require substantial or unexpected investments in infrastructure or that could lead to changes in our customers’ behavior; and

other factors identified or discussed under “Item 3. Key Information––Risk Factors.”

Our forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, and our actual results or other developments may differ materially from the expectations expressed in the forward-looking statements. As for forward-looking statements that relate to future financial results and other projections, actual results will be different due to the inherent uncertainty of estimates, forecasts and projections. Because of these uncertainties, potential investors should not rely on these forward-looking statements.

We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

PART I

ITEM 1.

IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS

Not applicable.

ITEM 2.

OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE

Not applicable.

ITEM 3.

KEY INFORMATION

Selected Financial Information

The following selected financial data have been derived from our consolidated financial statements. The selected financial data as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 and for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. The selected financial data as of December 31, 2017 have been derived from our consolidated financial statements that are not included in this annual report. We have not included selected financial data as of or for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 as such information cannot be provided on a restated basis without unreasonable effort or expense.

The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto, “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” and “Presentation of Financial and Other Information.”

Oi has not paid any dividends and/or interest attributable to shareholders’ equity since January 1, 2014.

   For the Year Ended December 31, 
   2019  2018  2017 
   (in millions ofreais, except per share amounts
and as otherwise indicated)
 

Income Statement Data:

    

Net operating revenue

  R$20,136  R$22,060  R$23,790 

Cost of sales and services

   (15,315  (16,179  (15,669
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross profit

   4,821   5,881   8,121 

Selling expenses

   (3,548  (3,853  (4,103

General and administrative expenses

   (2,782  (2,739  (3,137

Other operating income (expenses), net

   (1,469  (4,557  (3,243
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating income (loss) before financial expenses, net, and taxes

   (2,977  (5,268  (2,361

Financial expenses, net

   (6,110  26,609   (3,197
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income (loss) before taxes

   (9,087  21,341   (5,558

Income tax and social contribution

   (8  3,275   (1,099
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

  R$(9,095 R$24,616  R$(6,656
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss) attributable to controlling shareholders

  R$(9,000 R$24,591  R$(6,365

Net income (loss) attributable tonon-controlling shareholders

   (95  24   (291

Net income (loss) applicable to each class of shares(1):

    

Common shares basic and diluted

   (8,765  22,036   (4,896

Preferred shares and ADSs basic and diluted

   (236  2,555   (1,469

Net income (loss) per share:

    

Common shares – basic and diluted

   (1.51  16.39   (9.42

Common ADSs – basic and diluted

   (7.57  81.94   (47.10

Preferred shares and ADSs – basic and diluted

   (1.51  16.39   (9.42

Weighted average shares outstanding (in thousands):

    

Common shares – basic and diluted

   5,788,447   1,344,686   519,752 

Preferred shares – basic and diluted

   155,615   155,915   155,915 

(1)

Basic and diluted earnings per share have been calculated using the “two class method.” See note 22 to our audited consolidated financial statements included in this annual report.

   As of December 31, 
   2019   2018   2017 
   (in millions ofreais) 

Balance Sheet Data:

      

Cash and cash equivalents

  R$2,082   R$4,385   R$6,863 

Short-term investments

   184    202    21 

Trade accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts

   6,335    6,517    7,367 

Assets held for sale

   4,391    4,923    4,675 

Total current assets

   17,993    21,313    23,748 

Property, plant and equipment, net

   38,911    28,426    26,989 

Non-current judicial deposits

   6,651    7,019    8,290 

Intangible assets, net

   3,998    6,948    8,351 

Total assets

   71,892    65,438    68,639 

Short-term borrowings and financing (including current portion of long-term debt)

   326    673    54,515 

Short-term leases payables

   1,510         

Short-term trade payables

   4,794    5,024    4,924 

Liabilities of assets held for sale

   494    527    354 

Total current liabilities

   11,836    10,689    67,892 

Long-term borrowings and financing

   17,900    15,777     

Long-term leases payables

   6,640         

Total liabilities

   54,095    42,542    82,152 

Share capital

   32,539    32,038    21,438 

Shareholders’ equity

   17,797    22,896    (13,513

Risk Factors

You should consider the following risks as well as the other information set forth in this annual report when evaluating an investment in our company. In general, investing in the securities of issuers in emerging market countries, such as Brazil, involves a higher degree of risk than investing in the securities of issuers in the United States. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us, or those that we currently deem to be immaterial, may also materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. Any of the following risks could materially affect us. In such case, the market price of the Common Shares, Preferred Shares and ADSs could be adversely affected.

Risks Relating to the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry and Regulatory Environment

The Brazilian telecommunications industry is highly regulated. Changes to these regulations have and may continue to adversely impact our business.

The Brazilian telecommunications industry is highly regulated by ANATEL. ANATEL regulates, among other things, rates, quality of service and universal service goals, as well as competition among telecommunications service providers. Changes in laws and regulations, grants of new concessions, authorizations or licenses or the imposition of additional universal service obligations, among other factors, may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. For more information, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry.”

We cannot predict whether ANATEL or the Brazilian government will adopt these or other telecommunications sector policies in the future, or the consequences of such policies on our business or the business of our competitors. In the event that any modification of the regulatory scheme or new regulations applicable to our company are adopted that increase the costs of compliance to our company, whether through capital expenditure requirements, increased service requirements, increased costs for renewal of our authorizations and licenses, increased exposure to regulatory penalties or otherwise, these modifications and regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our concession agreements and authorizations contain certain obligations, and our failure to comply with these obligations may result in various fines and penalties being imposed on us by ANATEL.

Our local fixed-line and domestic long-distance concession agreements in Brazil contain terms reflecting the General Plan of Universal Service Goals (Plano Geral de Metas de Universalização), or the PGMU, the Quality Management Regulations (Regulamento de Gestão da Qualidade), or the RGQ, which was adopted by ANATEL in June 2013, and was partially superseded by the Quality of Telecommunications Services Regulation (Regulamento de Qualidade dos Serviços de Telecomunicações), or the RQUAL, in December 2019, and other regulations adopted by ANATEL, the terms of which could affect our financial condition and results of operations. Our local fixed-line concession agreements in Brazil also require us to meet certain network expansion, quality of service and modernization obligations in each of the Brazilian states in our service areas. In the event of noncompliance with ANATEL targets in any one of these states, ANATEL can establish a deadline for achieving the targeted level of such service, impose penalties and, in extreme situations, terminate the applicable concession agreement for noncompliance with our quality and universal service obligations. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry—Our Services—Fixed-Line Telephone Services.”

In addition, our authorizations to provide personal mobile services contain certain obligations requiring us to meet network scope and quality of service targets. If we fail to meet these obligations, we may be fined by ANATEL until we are in full compliance with our obligations and, in extreme circumstances, our authorizations could be revoked by ANATEL. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry—Our Services—Mobile Telephone Services.”

On an almost weekly basis, we receive inquiries from ANATEL requiring information from us on our compliance with the various service obligations imposed on us by our concession agreements. If we are unable to respond satisfactorily to those inquiries or comply with our service obligations under our concession agreements, ANATEL may commence administrative proceedings in connection with such noncompliance. We have received numerous notices of commencement of administrative proceedings from ANATEL, mostly due to our inability to achieve certain targets established in the PGMU and the RGQ. For more information, see “Item 8. Financial Information—Legal Proceedings—Civil Claims Relating to Oi S.A. and Our Brazilian Operations—Administrative Proceedings.”

Our concession agreements in Brazil are subject to periodic modifications by ANATEL, and we cannot assure you that the modifications to these concession agreements will not have adverse effects on our company.

We provide fixed-line telecommunications services in our Brazilian service areas pursuant to concession agreements with the Brazilian government. These concession agreements expire on December 31, 2025 and may be amended by the parties every five years prior to the expiration date. In connection with each five-year amendment, ANATEL has the right, following public consultations, to impose new terms and conditions in response to changes in technology, competition in the marketplace and domestic and international economic conditions. Under their existing terms, our concession agreements may be amended by December 2020 at the latest.

We cannot assure you that any future amendments to our concession agreements will not impose requirements on our company that will require us to undertake significant capital expenditures or will not modify the rate-setting procedures applicable to us in a manner that will significantly reduce the net operating revenue that we generate from our Brazilian fixed-line businesses. If the amendments to our Brazilian concession agreements have these effects, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

We cannot assure you that we will be able to convert our concessions into authorizations or renew our concessions in a timely or cost-effective manner.

On October 3, 2019, the President of Brazil signed Law No. 13,879, which amended the Brazilian General Telecommunications Law (Lei Geral das Telecomunicações), or the General Telecommunications Law, to allow, among other things, providers of fixed-line telecommunications services operating under a concession in the public regime to convert their concessions into authorizations to operate in the private regime and thereby eliminate a number of obligations currently imposed by the concession regime. In exchange, providers may be required to assume obligations to make additional investments in their networks, primarily related to the expansion of broadband services. The cost of the additional investments in exchange for the elimination of such obligations, would be subject to discussion between the parties, with ANATEL having the ability to make the final valuation. In addition, the new law permits providers to renew their concession for indefinite additional20-year periods, whereas previously only one20-year renewal period was allowed, provided that at least 30 months prior to each expiration date, the providers have complied with the obligations required of them under the applicable concession. Prior to the passage of Law No. 13,879, our concession agreements would have expired in 2025 without the possibility of renewal. In February 2020, ANATEL proposed regulations to implement Law No. 13,879, including the rules that will govern the conversion of concessions into authorizations. These proposed regulations are subject to a public consultation period that is expected to expire on April 23,30, 2020. We cannot predict when and to what extent these regulations will be adopted. Once these regulations are adopted, we expect that we will be able to migrate our public regime concessions into private-regime authorizations or renew our concessions, which would otherwise expire on December 31, 2025. However, as of the date of this annual report, we have not decided which option to pursue and cannot predict the cost of pursuing any of these options. For more information about Law No. 13,879, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry—Public Regime—Amendments to the General Telecommunications Law” and “Item 4. Information on the Company—Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry—Our Services—Fixed-Line Telephone Services.”

If we are not able to convert our concessions into authorizations or renew our concessions prior to the expiration of our existing concessions, we may be able to participate in competitive auctions for new concessions that the Brazilian government may choose to conduct. However, our existing fixed-line and domestic long-distance concession agreements will not entitle us to preferential treatment in these auctions, and we may not be able to secure new concessions for our existing service areas in any future auctions or such concessions may be on less favorable terms than our current concessions. In such cases, our business, financial condition and results of operations would be materially adversely affected.

The mobile telecommunications industry and participants in this industry, including us, may be required to adopt an extensive program of field measurements of radio frequency emissions and be subject to further regulation and/or claims based on concerns regarding potential health problems and interfere with medical devices.

Media and other entities have suggested that the electromagnetic emissions from mobile handsets and base stations may cause health problems. If consumers harbor health-related concerns, they may be discouraged from using mobile handsets. These concerns could have an adverse effect on the mobile telecommunications industry and, possibly, expose mobile services providers to litigation. We cannot assure you that further medical research and studies will refute a link between the electromagnetic emissions of mobile handsets and base stations, including on frequency ranges we use to provide mobile services, and these health concerns. Government authorities could increase regulation on electromagnetic emissions of mobile handsets and base stations, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. The expansion of our network may be affected by these perceived risks if we experience problems in finding new sites, which, in turn, may delay the expansion and may affect the quality of our services.

In July 2002, ANATEL enacted regulations that limit emission and exposure for fields with frequencies between 9 kHz and 300 GHz. In May 2009, Law No. 11,934 was enacted, which established the need for field measurements by telecommunications service providers of all radio-communication transmitting stations every five years with respect to emission and exposure to these fields. In September 2018, ANATEL published Resolution No. 700/2018, a regulation pursuant to Law No. 11,934 that makes field measurements mandatory by telecommunication service providers of all radio-communication transmission stations every five years beginning in 2019. In January 2019, ANATEL passed Act No. 458/2019 regarding the technical requirements of Resolution No. 700/2018. However, Act No. 458/2019 is not yet in full force because the measurement parameters have not yet been defined, and ANATEL has had difficulties implementing internal systems to monitor compliance. We are still evaluating the scope of the technical and financial impact of these new regulations on our company, as ANATEL has not yet defined all of the relevant technical requirements related to these regulations as of the date of this annual report.

Companies in the Brazilian telecommunication industry, including us, may be harmed by restrictions regarding the installation of new antennas for mobile services.

As of the date of this annual report, there are approximately 250 municipal laws in Brazil that limit the installation of new antennas for mobile service, which has been a barrier to the expansion of mobile networks. Those laws are meant to regulate issues related to zoning and the alleged effects of the radiation and radiofrequencies of the antennas. The federal law, that establishes new guidelines to create a consolidated plan for the installation of antennas was approved in 2015, however, it is still pending specific regulation. Despite the federal initiative, as long as the municipal laws remain unchanged, the risk of noncompliance with regulations and of having services of limited quality in certain areas continues to exist, which could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Additional antenna installation is also limited as a result of concerns that radio frequency emissions from base stations may cause health problems. See “—The mobile telecommunications industry and participants in this industry, including us, may be required to adopt an extensive program of field measurements of radio frequency emissions and be subject to further regulation and/or claims based on concerns regarding potential health problems and interfere with medical devices.”

The telecommunications industry is subject to frequent changes in technology. Our ability to remain competitive depends on our ability to implement new technology, and it is difficult to predict how new technology will affect our business.

Companies in the telecommunications industry must adapt to rapid and significant technological changes that are usually difficult to anticipate. The mobile telecommunications industry in particular has experienced rapid and significant technological development and frequent improvements in capacity, quality and data-transmission speed. We expect that new products and technologies will emerge and that existing products and technologies will be further developed. For example, ANATEL is expected to conduct auctions for radiofrequencies in the 5G spectrum during 2020. The advent of new products and technologies could have a variety of consequences. Our future success depends on our ability to anticipate and adapt in a timely manner to technological changes. Technological changes may render our equipment, services and technology obsolete or inefficient, which may adversely affect our competitiveness or require us to increase our capital expenditures in order to maintain our competitive position. These new products and technologies may reduce the price of our services by providing lower-cost alternatives and the creation of new digital services.

For example, personal mobility service providers in Brazil are experiencing increasing competition fromover-the-top, or OTT, providers, which provide content (such as WhatsApp, Skype and YouTube) over an internet connection rather than through a service provider’s network. OTT providers are becoming increasingly competitive as customers shift from mobile voice and SMS communications to internet-based voice and data communications through computers and smartphone or tablet applications. In addition, as providers of fixed and mobile telecommunications services, we face more legal, regulatory and tax barriers than providers of OTT services, increasing our costs in relation to these provides and preventing us from being able to fully compete with them.

We may not obtain the expected benefits of our investments if more advanced technologies are adopted by the market. Even if we adopt new technologies in a timely manner as they are developed, the cost of such technology may exceed the benefit to us, and we cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain our level of competitiveness.

Our operations depend on our ability to maintain, upgrade and operate efficiently our accounting, billing, customer service, information technology and management information systems and to rely on the systems of other carriers underco-billing agreements.

Our success largely depends on the continued and uninterrupted performance of our controls, network technology systems and of certain hardware. Our technical infrastructure (including our network infrastructure for mobile telecommunications services) is vulnerable to damage or interruption from information and telecommunication technology failures, power loss, floods, windstorms, fires, terrorism, intentional wrongdoing, human error and similar events. Our controls are dependent, not exclusively, on these technological systems and are also subject to interruptions and failures. Unanticipated problems with our controls, or at our facilities, system failures, hardware or software failures, computer viruses or hacker attacks could affect the quality of our services and cause service interruptions. Any of these occurrences could result in reduced user traffic and reduced revenue and could harm our levels of customer satisfaction, our reputation and compliance with certain of our regulatory obligations.

Sophisticated information and processing systems are vital to our growth and our ability to monitor costs, render monthly invoices for services, process customer orders, provide customer service and achieve operating efficiencies. We cannot assure you that we will be able to operate successfully and upgrade our accounting, information and processing systems or that these systems will continue to perform as expected. We have entered intoco-billing agreements with each long-distance telecommunications service provider that is interconnected to our networks in Brazil to include in our invoices the long-distance services rendered by these providers, and these providers have agreed to include charges owed to us in their invoices. Any failure in our accounting, information and processing systems, or any problems with the execution of invoicing and collection services by other carriers with whom we haveco-billing agreements, could impair our ability to collect payments from customers and respond satisfactorily to customer needs, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We face various cyber-security risks that, if not adequately addressed, could have an adverse effect on our business.

We face various cyber-security risks that could result in business losses, including but not limited to contamination (whether intentional or accidental) of our networks and systems by third parties with whom we exchange data, equipment failures or unauthorized access to and loss of confidential customer, employee and/or proprietary data by persons inside or outside of our organization. We are also exposed to cyber attacks causing systems degradation or service unavailability, the penetration of our information technology systems and platforms byill-intentioned third parties, and infiltration of malware (such as computer viruses) into our systems.

The risks of cyber attacks has been exacerbated as a result of measures that we have adopted to combat theCOVID-19 pandemic, principally the institution of a “work-from-home” policy for our employees. Because our managers and employees have access to our information systems from their remote locations, the demands on our security systems have increased. Although we have implemented measures to prevent unauthorized access to our systems through the compromise of these remote access points, we cannot assure you that perpetrators of cyber attacks will be prevented from accessing our information systems in all cases.

Cyber attacks against companies have increased in frequency, scope and potential harm in recent years. Further, the perpetrators of cyber attacks are not restricted to particular groups or persons. These attacks may be committed by company employees or third parties operating in any region, including jurisdictions where law enforcement measures to address such attacks are unavailable or ineffective. We may not be able to successfully protect our operational and information technology systems and platforms against such threats. Further, as cyber attacks continue to evolve, we may incur significant costs in the attempt to modify or enhance our protective measures or investigate or remediate any vulnerability.

The inability to operate our networks and systems as a result of cyber attacks, even for a limited period of time, may result in significant expenses to us and/or a loss of market share to other telecommunications providers. The costs associated with a major cyber attack could include expensive incentives offered to existing customers and business partners to retain their business, increased expenditures on cyber-security measures and the use of alternate resources, lost revenues from business interruption and litigation. If we are unable to adequately address these cyber-security risks, our operating network and information systems could be compromised, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Risks Relating to Our Company

Our debt instruments contain covenants that could restrict our financing and operating flexibility and have other adverse consequences.

As of December 31, 2019, we had total outstanding borrowings and financing of R$31,642 million, excluding the fair value adjustment to our borrowings and financing and debt issuance costs, and R$18,227 million, after giving effect to the fair value adjustment and debt issuance costs. In addition, in February 2020, an investor subscribed to an aggregate amount of R$2,500 million of Oi Mobile’snon-convertible debentures. We are subject to certain financial covenants under the instruments that govern our indebtedness that limit our ability to incur additional debt. The level of our consolidated indebtedness and the requirements and limitations imposed by these debt instruments could adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations. In particular, the terms of some of these debt instruments restrict or may restrict our ability, and the ability of our subsidiaries, to:

incur or guarantee additional debt;

grant liens over or pledge assets;

sell or dispose of assets;

merge or consolidate with another company;

pay dividends or distributions on capital stock or repurchase capital stock; and

make certain acquisitions, mergers and consolidations.

These covenants could limit our ability to plan for or react to market conditions or to meet our operational or capital needs, which could reduce future net operating revenue and adversely affect our cash flows and profitability. Our ability to comply with these covenants may be affected by events beyond our control, and we may have to curtail some operations to maintain compliance. As of December 31, 2019, we were in full compliance with our financial covenants under our financial instruments.

In addition, the failure of Oi and our restricted subsidiaries to comply with these covenants could result in a default under our debt agreements, which could permit the holders to accelerate our obligation to repay the debt and may be cross-defaulted to other debt. Our assets or cash flow may not be sufficient to fully repay borrowings under our outstanding debt agreements if accelerated upon an event of default, and there is no guarantee that we would be able to repay, refinance or restructure the payments on those debt agreements.

Furthermore, our debt instruments with BNDES contain financial covenants that require Oi to maintain five specified financial ratios, measured on a quarterly basis. Under these debt instruments, BNDES has the right to accelerate the debt if, at the date the financial covenants are tested, we are not in compliance with any two of these ratios. At December 31, 2019, we were in compliance with these financial covenants. As a result of the depreciation of thereal subsequent to December 31, 2019, partially due to theCOVID-19 pandemic and the public health measures adopted to combat the pandemic in Brazil and internationally, and the related effects on our U.S. dollar-denominated indebtedness and interest expenses, we believed that it was probable that as of March 31, 2020, we would not be in compliance with more than one of these financial ratios. In anticipation of these ratio breaches, on March 30, 2020 we obtained a waiver from BNDES. The cross-default or cross-acceleration clauses in the instruments governing our other indebtedness (other than Oi Mobile’snon-convertible debentures) provide that an event of default under our debt instruments with BNDES do not trigger an event of default under our other indebtedness or enable the creditors under other indebtedness to accelerate that indebtedness.

Under the RJ Plan, until February 5, 2023, we are required to apply an amount equivalent to 100% of the net revenue from our sale of assets in excess of US$200 million to investments in our activities. Beginning on February 5, 2024, we are required to allocate to the repayment of debt instruments representing recoveries under the RJ Plan on an annual basis an amount equivalent to 70% of the amount by which (1) our cash and cash equivalents and financial investments at the end of each fiscal year exceeds (2) the greater of (a) 25% of our operating expenses and capital expenses for that fiscal year, and (b) R$5,000 million, subject to adjustment in the event that we conclude any capital increases. The cash required to make these repayments will reduce the amount available to us to make capital expenditures.

The RJ Plan permits us to borrow up to R$2 billion under new export credit facilities, as described under “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Liquidity and Capital Resources.” This debt may be denominated inreais or in foreign currencies. Accordingly, we may incur interest expenses and foreign exchange gains and losses in connection with this new debt. A significant increase in any of these interest rates could adversely affect our financial expenses and negatively affect our overall financial performance.

If the Brazilian Confirmation Order is overturned or modified, the RJ Debtors may be declared bankrupt under Brazilian law and liquidated.

On June 20, 2016, Oi, together with the other RJ Debtors, filed a joint voluntary petition for judicial reorganization pursuant to the Brazilian Bankruptcy Law with the RJ Court, pursuant to an urgent measure approved by our board of directors. On December 19 and 20, 2017, a GCM was held to consider approval of the most recently filed judicial reorganization plan. This GCM concluded on December 20, 2017 following the approval of the RJ Plan reflecting amendments to the judicial reorganization plan presented at this GCM as negotiated during the course of this GCM. On January 8, 2018, the RJ Court entered the Brazilian Confirmation Order, ratifying and confirming the RJ Plan. The Brazilian Confirmation Order was published in the Official Gazette of the State of Rio de Janeiro on February 5, 2018, the Brazilian Confirmation Date. For more information with respect to the RJ Proceedings, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—Our Recent History and Development—Our Judicial Reorganization Proceedings.”

The Brazilian Confirmation Order, according to its terms, is currently binding on all parties, although it is subject to six pending appeals with no suspensive effect attributed to those appeals. By operation of the RJ Plan and the Brazilian Confirmation Order, provided that the Brazilian Confirmation Order is not overturned or altered as a result of the pending appeals filed against it by certain creditors, the unsecured claims against the RJ Debtors have been novated and discharged under Brazilian law and holders of such claims are entitled only to receive the recoveries set forth in the RJ Plan in exchange for their claims in accordance with the terms and conditions of the RJ Plan.

If the Brazilian Confirmation Order is overturned or modified and, as a result, the RJ Debtors are declared bankrupt, which under Brazilian law is generally followed by a liquidation of the debtors’ assets, the rights and guarantees of the creditors recognized by the RJ Court will be restored under the original terms as if the RJ Plan had never been approved, net of amounts validly received pursuant to the RJ Plan, in accordance with Brazilian Bankruptcy Law. A modification of the Brazilian Confirmation Order may lead to a breach of the RJ Plan by the RJ Debtors. In case of breach of the RJ Plan by the RJ Debtors, creditors will be entitled to (1) approve a modification to the RJ Plan at a meeting of creditors complying with the quorum requirements established in the Brazilian Bankruptcy Law, or (2) seek to have the RJ Debtors adjudicated as bankrupt by the RJ Court.

We are subject to numerous legal and administrative proceedings, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We are subject to numerous legal and administrative proceedings. It is difficult to quantify the potential impact of these legal and administrative proceedings. We classify our risk of loss from legal and administrative proceedings as “probable,” “possible” or “remote.” We make provisions for probable losses but do not make provisions for possible and remote losses.

As of December 31, 2019, we had provisioned R$5,252 million for probable losses relating to various tax, labor and civil legal and administrative proceedings against us. As of December 31, 2019, we had claims against us of R$28,416 million in tax proceedings, R$798 million in labor proceedings and R$1,668 million in civil proceedings with a risk of loss classified as “possible” for which we had made no provisions. We are not required to disclose or record provisions for proceedings in which our management judges the risk of loss to be remote. However, the amounts involved in certain of the proceedings in which we believe our risk of loss is remote could be substantial. Consequently, our losses could be significantly higher than the amounts for which we have recorded provisions.

If we are subject to unfavorable decisions in any legal or administrative proceedings and the losses in those proceedings significantly exceed the amount for which we have provisioned or involve proceedings for which we have made no provision, our results of operations and financial condition may be materially adversely affected. Even for the amounts recorded as provisions for probable losses, a judgment against us would have an effect on our cash flow if we are required to pay those amounts. Unfavorable decisions in these legal proceedings may, therefore, reduce our liquidity and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. For a more detailed description of these proceedings, see “Item 8. Financial Information—Legal Proceedings.”

We have indemnification obligations with respect to the PT Exchange Agreement and the PT Portugal disposition that could materially adversely affect our financial position.

In the exchange agreement, or the PT Exchange Agreement, that we entered into with Pharol under which we transferred defaulted commercial paper of Rio Forte Investments S.A., or Rio Forte, to Pharol in exchange for the delivery to our company of Common Shares and Preferred Shares as described under “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—Major Shareholders—PT Option Agreement,” we agreed to indemnify Pharol against any loss arising from (1) Pharol’s contingent or absolute tax or anti-trust obligations in relation to the assets contributed to our company in the Oi capital increase in connection with which we acquired PT Portugal from Pharol in May 2014 and (2) Pharol’s management activities, with reference to acts or triggering events occurring on or prior to May 5, 2014, excluding any losses incurred by Pharol as a result of the financial investments in the Rio Forte commercial paper and the acquisition of the Rio Forte commercial paper from Oi under the PT Exchange Agreement.

In the share purchase agreement under which we sold PT Portugal in the PT Portugal disposition, we agreed to indemnify Altice Portugal for breaches of our representations and warranties under the share purchase agreement, subject to certain customary procedural and financial limitations. There can be no assurance that we will not be subject to significant claims under these indemnification provisions and if we are subject to such claims under these indemnification provisions, we could be required to pay significant amounts, which would have an adverse effect on our financial condition.

In the PT Ventures Share Purchase Agreement under which we sold PT Ventures to Sociedade Nacional de Combustíveis de Angola, Empresa Pública – Sonangol E.P., or Sonangol, we agreed to indemnify Sonangol for breaches of our representations and warranties under the PT Ventures Share Purchase Agreement, subject to certain customary procedural and financial limitations. There can be no assurance that we will not be subject to significant claims under these indemnification provisions and if we are subject to such claims under these indemnification provisions, we could be required to pay significant amounts, which would have an adverse effect on our financial condition.

We are subject to credit risks with respect to our customers. If we are unable to limit payment delinquencies by our customers, or if delinquent payments by our customers increase, our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

Our business significantly depends on our customers’ ability to pay their bills and comply with their obligations to us. During 2019, we recorded provisions for doubtful accounts in the amount of R$489 million, or 2.4% of our net operating revenue, primarily due to subscribers’ delinquencies. As of December 31, 2019, our provision for doubtful accounts was R$774 million.

ANATEL regulations allow us to implement certain policies to reduce customer defaults, such as service restrictions or limitations on the types of services provided based on a subscriber’s credit record. If we are unable to successfully implement policies to limit delinquencies of our Brazilian subscribers or otherwise select our customers based on their credit records, persistent subscriber delinquencies and bad debt will continue to adversely affect our operating and financial results.

In addition, if the Brazilian economy declines due to, among other factors, a reduction in the level of economic activity, an increase in inflation or an increase in domestic interest rates, a greater portion of our customers may not be able to pay their bills on a timely basis. For example, although do not have sufficient experience with the effects of the public health measures adopted in Brazil in response to theCOVID-19 pandemic to reliably estimate the quantitative effects of these measures, we expect that these public health measures will have significant impacts on the income and purchasing power of many of our subscribers, particularlylow-income subscribers and SMEs, some of whom may cease operations. Any increase in expected losses on trade receivables would adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

We are dependent on key personnel and the ability to hire and retain additional personnel.

We believe that our success will depend on the continued services of our senior management team and other key personnel. Our management team is comprised of highly qualified professionals, with extensive experience in the telecommunications industry. The loss of the services of any of our senior management team or other key employees could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. We also depend on the ability of our senior management and key personnel to work effectively as a team.

Our future success also depends on our ability to identify, attract, hire, train, retain and motivate highly skilled technical, managerial, sales and marketing personnel. Competition for such personnel is intense, and we cannot guarantee that we will successfully attract, assimilate or retain a sufficient number of qualified personnel. Failure to retain and attract the necessary technical, managerial, sales and marketing and administrative personnel could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The outcome of Operation Mine Map, a criminal investigation being conducted by Brazilian authorities that involves historical agreements of our company with certain entities, and any further investigations that may be commenced related to these agreements, could have a material adverse effect on our company.

On December 10, 2019, the Brazilian Federal Police launched Operation Mine Map (OperaçãoMapa da Mina). One of the main targets of Operation Mine Map was Fábio da Silva, son of former president Luiz Ignácio Lula da Silva. The subject of the investigation includes payments made by us to two groups of companies, Gamecorp and Grupo Gol. Brazilian authorities allege that these payments were made in exchange for benefits from the Brazilian government. In connection with the investigation, our headquarters and some other buildings in the States of São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro and in Brasília were searched and documents were seized relating to our business with Gamecorp and Grupo Gol.

We have been cooperating with Brazilian authorities involved in Operation Mine Map and have provided information and documents. We have not been notified that we are a target of any investigation relating to Operation Mine Map. None of our current executive officers or members of our board of directors were involved in our historical relationships with Gamecorp and Grupo Gol.

We cannot predict when the Operation Mine Mapinvestigation will be completed or the results of such investigation, including whether any litigation or enforcement action will be brought against us or the outcome or impact of any resulting litigation or enforcement action, nor can we predict any potential actions that may be taken by the relevant authorities. Any adverse development in the Operation Mine Mapinvestigation could subject us to potential fines or penalties under applicable law, materially adversely affect our public reputation, and could have a material adverse effect on us, including: (1) threatening our ability to obtain new financing, which could impair our ability to operate our business; and (2) shifting management’s focus to these matters, which could harm our ability to meet our strategic objectives. Additionally, while we have taken, and are continuing to take, measures to enhance our compliance programs, which are intended to assist us in detecting and preventing bribery and corruption, there can be no assurance that these efforts will enable us to detect or prevent all such activities.

We could be adversely affected by violations of anti-corruption laws and regulations.

We are required to comply with Brazilian anti-corruption laws and regulations, including Brazilian Law No. 12,846/2013, or the Brazilian Anti-Corruption Law, as well as anti-corruption laws and regulations in other jurisdictions, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, or the FCPA.

The Brazilian Anti-Corruption Law, the FCPA and similar anti-corruption laws in other jurisdictions generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to government officials or other persons for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. Recent years have seen a substantial increase in anti-corruption law enforcement activity, with more frequent and aggressive investigations and enforcement proceedings by both the U.S. Department of Justice and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, increased enforcement activity bynon-U.S. regulators, and increases in criminal and civil proceedings brought against companies and individuals. Our policies mandate compliance with these anti-corruption laws. We operate, through our businesses, in countries that are recognized as having governmental and commercial corruption. We cannot assure you that our internal control policies and procedures will protect us from reckless or criminal acts committed by our employees, the employees of any of our businesses, or third party intermediaries. In the event that we believe or have reason to believe that our employees or agents have or may have violated applicable anti-corruption laws, including the FCPA, we may be required to investigate or have outside counsel investigate the relevant facts and circumstances, which can be expensive and require significant time and attention from senior management. Violations of these laws may result in criminal or civil sanctions, inability to do business with existing or future business partners (either as a result of express prohibitions or to avoid the appearance of impropriety), injunctions against future conduct, profit disgorgements, disqualifications from directly or indirectly engaging in certain types of businesses, the loss of business permits or other restrictions which could disrupt our business and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

Risks Relating to Our Operations

We face significant competition in the Brazilian market and increasing competition from other services, which may adversely affect our results of operations.

We face increasing competition throughout Brazil from other telecommunications service providers in each of our core service businesses. In our Residential Services business, we compete with other fixed-line voice service providers, primarily Claro S.A., or Claro, a subsidiary of América Móvil S.A.B. de C.V., and Telefônica Brasil S.A., a subsidiary of Telefónica S.A., or Telefônica Brasil. In addition to Claro and Telefônica Brasil, our Residential Services business competes for broadband subscribers with a myriad of smaller local and regional broadband services providers. Finally, our Residential Services business competes forPay-TV broadband subscribers with Claro and SKY Brasil Serviços Ltda., or SKY, and Telefônica Brasil. In our Personal Mobility Services business, we compete with Telefônica Brasil, Claro, and TIM Participações S.A., a subsidiary of Telecom Italia S.p.A., or TIM. In our Business to Business, or B2B, Services business, we compete with all of these competitors for small- andmedium-sized enterprise, or SME, and corporate subscribers (including governmental entities) for our fixed-line and mobile services.

Our primary competitors, Telefônica Brasil, TIM and Claro are each controlled by multinational companies that may have more significant financial and marketing resources, and greater abilities to access capital on a timely basis and on more favorable terms, than our company.

As a result of competition from mobile services, we expect (1) the number of our fixed lines in service to continue to decline as some of our customers eliminate their fixed-line services in favor of mobile services, and (2) the use of existing fixed lines for making voice calls to decline, as customers replace fixed-line calls in favor of calls on mobile phones as a result of the emergence of“all-net” plans, which allow a customer to make calls to any fixed-line or mobile device of any operator for a flat monthly fee. The reduction in the number of our fixed lines in service has negatively affected and is likely to continue to negatively affect our net operating revenue and margins.

The primary drivers of competition in the broadband industry are stability and quality of the service, speed and price, with discounts typically offered in the form of bundled services. Claro and Telefônica Brasil each offer broadband services at higher speeds than ours and both offer integrated voice, broadband andPay-TV services, typically as bundles, to the residential services market through a single network infrastructure. In addition, an increasing number of small local and regional providers are competing in the broadband space offeringfiber-to-the-home, or FTTH, at competitive prices. Future offerings by our competitors that are aggressively priced or that offer additional services could have an adverse effect on our net operating revenue and our results of operations.

We offerPay-TV services throughout the regions in which we provide residential services. ThePay-TV market in Brazil has been facing a steady drop in the number of subscribers since 2015 as a result of the financial crisis, piracy, and an increase in the cord-cutting effect resulting from more widespread use of OTT services in Brazil, such as Netflix, Amazon Prime Video, HBO Go and others.

We and each of our principal competitors in the mobile telecommunications market offer Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS), or 3G, and our Long Term Evolution (LTE), or 4G, mobile telecommunications network technology. Our competitors have a much larger coverage footprint (in terms of cities covered) than we do both in 3G and 4G. In addition, the cost of maintaining our revenue share in this market may increase and in the future we may incur higher advertising and other costs as we attempt to maintain or expand our market presence. As mobile interconnection, or MTR, tariffs have declined in recent years, a trend towards SIM card consolidation has developed, reversing the trend of customers using multiple SIM cards to participate inon-net calling plans offered by multiple service providers; this trend has resulted, and may continue to result in, a decline in the size of our customer base. Acquiring each additional personal mobility customer entails costs, including sales commissions and marketing costs. Recovering these costs depends on our ability to retain such customers. Therefore, high rates of customer churn could have a material adverse effect on the profitability of our Personal Mobility Services business. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the average monthly churn rate of our Personal Mobility Services business, representing the number of subscribers whose service was disconnected during each month, whether voluntarily or involuntarily, divided by the number of subscribers at the beginning of such month, was 3.28% per month. Our inability to compete effectively to maintain and increase our market share in this market could adversely affect our net operating revenue and profitability.

Our mobile subscribers are demanding higher quality and more data availability, which require higher investments in development, modernization, expansion and continuous improvement in service quality and customers’ experience. As discussed above, some of our competitors may have greater access to cheaper capital and the ability to invest in new technologies, including 4.5G and 700 MHz frequencies. Oi is the only operator in the market that does not have a license for the 700 MHz frequency.

As a result of the increased availability of 4G mobile network technology, there has been an increase in the use of OTT services in Brazil, including instant internet messaging and Voice over Internet Protocol, or VoIP, and services on smartphone applications such as Facebook Messenger and WhatsApp. OTT applications are often free of charge, other than for data usage, accessible by smartphones, tablets and computers and allow their users to have access to potentially unlimited messaging and voice services over the internet, bypassing more expensive traditional voice and messaging services such astwo-way short (or text) message services known as SMS, which have historically been, but are no longer a source of significant revenues. With the growing use of smartphones in Brazil, an increasing number of customers are using OTT application services as a substitute for traditional voice or SMS communications. As a result, we see the migration of traffic from voice to data and consequently the introduction of offers from almost all competitors of unlimited voice plans in their portfolio, accelerating the process of commoditization of voice service. These trends could have an adverse effect on the average revenue per unit, or ARPU, generated by our mobile customer base and our profitability.

TheCOVID-19 pandemic could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

Since December 2019,SARS-CoV-2, a novel strain of coronavirus referred to asCOVID-19, has spread throughout the world. On January 31, 2020, the World Health Organization announced thatCOVID-19 was a global health emergency and on March 3, 2020, the World Health Organization categorizedCOVID-19 as a pandemic. TheCOVID-19 pandemic has resulted in numerous deaths and the imposition of local, municipal and national governmental“shelter-in-place” and other public health measures, border closures and other travel restrictions, causing unprecedented economic disruption in much of the world, including in Brazil.

The local, national and international response to the virus is quickly developing, fluid and uncertain. During March and April of 2020, state, local and municipal authorities within Brazil promoted and enforced public health measures, including social isolation and quarantine measures, and have enacted regulations limiting the operations of“non-essential” businesses. Inmid-March 2020, Rio de Janeiro and other Brazilian states declared a state of emergency. Although the Brazilian government has determined that the telecom sector is an essential service, which allows us to continue our field maintenance activities without violating restrictions on movement that have generally been imposed to combat the pandemic, in accordance with the recommendations of the authorities, we transitioned a substantial majority of our employees to work from home.

Although we have devoted considerable resources to preventative measures in order to reduce the potential impacts of theCOVID-19 pandemic on our employees, business, service and operations, there can be no assurance that these measures will be effective or that the pandemic will not have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. For example, public health measures could affect our network quality in the event that our networks are unable to meet increased demand as a result of orders from the authorities that individuals stay at or work at home. In addition, sales of certain of our products and services, such as services offered throughdoor-to-door sales channels and sales made through our retail stores, will be reduced as a result of public health measures, which could negatively impact us. The impact of public health measures adopted in Brazil on the income and purchasing power of our subscribers, particularlylow-income subscribers and SMEs, some of whom may cease operations, could reduce their ability to pay us for services, which could result in a decline in our cash flows from operations and an increase in our expected losses on trade receivables. If any applicable governmental body imposes rules preventing our termination services as a result ofnon-payment, thus encouraging customer defaults on invoices, such measures are likely to result in a decline in our cash flows from operations and an increase in our expected losses on trade receivables. Finally, as a result of restrictions on certain activities, it is possible that our personnel may be unable to perform routine maintenance and installation activities, which could adversely affect our operations and sales. For more information about specific measures that we have adopted and potential impacts on our business operations, see “Item. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Principal Factors Affecting Our Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Potential Effects of theCOVID-19 Pandemic.

We cannot predict the full effect of the pandemic on our business or on the Brazilian economy. Federal, state and municipal governments in Brazil may announce further restrictions on the general population and we cannot predict what effect this will have on our operations and sales in the long term. We cannot predict the duration of the pandemic, the effectiveness of governmental or other measures taken to attempt to curb the pandemic, or the duration of any such measures. In addition, following the pandemic and the termination of any such governmental restrictions, the needs and preferences of our customers may have been altered. None of the losses incurred or to be incurred by us as a result of theCOVID-19 pandemic, whether as a result of business interruption or inability to attract new customers, is covered by insurance currently held by us. As a result, any such losses could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

We may be unable to implement our plans to expand and enhance our existing networks in Brazil in a timely manner or without unanticipated costs, which could hinder or prevent the successful implementation of our business plan and result in revenues and net income being less than expected.

Our business as a telecommunications services provider depends on our ability to maintain and expand our telecommunications services network. Our ability to achieve our strategic objectives depends in large part on the successful, timely and cost-effective implementation of our plans to expand and enhance our networks in Brazil. We believe that our expected growth will require, among other things:

continuous development of our operational and administrative systems;

efficiently allocating our capital;

increasing marketing activities;

improving our understanding of customer wants and needs;

continuous attention to service quality; and

attracting, training and retaining qualified management, technical, customer relations, and sales personnel.

We believe that these requirements will place significant demand on our managerial, operational and financial resources. Factors that could affect our implementation of our growth strategy include:

our ability to generate cash flow or to obtain future financing necessary to implement our projects;

delays in the delivery of telecommunications equipment by our vendors, which could be exacerbated by the effects of theCOVID-19 pandemic on the operations of our equipment suppliers;

the failure of the telecommunications equipment supplied by our vendors to comply with the expected capabilities;

the failure to obtain licenses necessary for our projects; and

delays resulting from the failure of third-party suppliers or contractors to meet their obligations in a timely and cost-effective manner, which could be exacerbated by the effects of theCOVID-19 pandemic on the operations of our third-party suppliers or contractors.

Although we believe that our cost estimates and implementation schedule are reasonable and have not been affected by factors relating to theCOVID-19 pandemic, we cannot assure you that the actual costs or time required to complete the implementation of these projects will not substantially exceed our current estimates, particularly if theCOVID-19 pandemic increases in severity or extends over a prolonged period of time. Any significant cost overrun or delay could hinder or prevent the successful implementation of our business plan and result in revenues and net income being less than expected. Failure to manage successfully our expected growth could reduce the quality of our services, with adverse effects on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We make investments based on demand forecasts that may become inaccurate due to economic volatility and may result in revenues that are lower than expected.

We make certain investments, such as the procurement of materials and the development of our network infrastructure, based on our forecasts of the amount of demand that customers will have for our services at a later date. However, any major changes in the Brazilian economic scenario may affect this demand and therefore our forecasts may turn out to be inaccurate. For example, economic impacts of theCOVID-19 pandemic and the public health measures adopted in Brazil to combat this pandemic, economic crises that restrict credit to the population, and uncertainties relating to employment may result in a delay in the decision to acquire new products or services (such as broadband orPay-TV). As a result, it is possible that we may make larger investments based on demand forecasts than were necessary given actual demand at the relevant time, which may directly affect our cash flow.

Furthermore, improvements in economic conditions may have the opposite effect. For example, an increase in demand not accompanied by our investment in improved infrastructure may result in a possible loss of opportunity to increase our revenue or result in the degradation of the quality of our services.

We rely on strategic suppliers of equipment, materials and certain services necessary for our operations and expansion. If these suppliers fail to provide equipment, materials or services to us on a timely basis, we could experience disruptions, which could have an adverse effect on our revenues and results of operations.

We are in the process of vendor consolidation by using only on a few strategic and most representative technology suppliers around the world to provide us with equipment and materials that we need in order to expand and to operate our business in Brazil. In addition, we rely on a third-party provider of network maintenance services in certain regions where we operate. There are a limited number of suppliers with the capability of providing the mobile network equipment and fixed-line network platforms that our operations and expansion plans require or the services that we require to maintain our networks. In addition, because the supply of mobile network equipment and fixed-line network platforms requires detailed supply planning and this equipment is technologically complex, it would be difficult for our company to replace the suppliers of this equipment. Suppliers of cables that we need to extend and maintain our networks may suffer capacity constraints or difficulties in obtaining the raw materials required to manufacture these cables. As a result, we are exposed to risks associated with these suppliers, including restrictions of production capacity for equipment and materials, availability of equipment and materials, delays in delivery of equipment, materials or services, and price increases, many of which may be exacerbated by the effects of theCOVID-19 pandemic and public health measures in Brazil and internationally to combat the pandemic. If these suppliers or vendors fail to provide equipment, materials or services to us on a timely basis or otherwise in compliance with the terms of our contracts with these suppliers, we could experience disruptions or declines in the quality of our services, which could have an adverse effect on our revenues and results of operations, and we might be unable to satisfy the requirements contained in our concession and authorization agreements.

Certain essential equipment is subject to risks related to importation, and we acquire other essential equipment from a limited number of domestic suppliers, which may further limit our ability to acquire such essential equipment in a timely and cost effective manner.

The high growth in data markets in general, and broadband in particular, may result in a limited supply of equipment essential for the provision of such services, such as data transmission equipment and modems. The restrictions on the number of manufacturers imposed by the Brazilian government for certain essential equipment, mainly data transmission equipment and modems, and the geographical locations ofnon-Brazilian manufacturers of this essential equipment, pose certain risks, including:

vulnerability to currency fluctuations in cases where essential equipment is imported and paid for with U.S. dollars, Euros or other foreign currencies, which could be exacerbated by the macroeconomic effects in Brazil of theCOVID-19 pandemic and the public health measures adopted in Brazil to combat the pandemic;

difficulties in managing inventory due to an inability to accurately forecast the domestic availability of certain essential equipment, which could be exacerbated by the effects of theCOVID-19 pandemic and the public health measures adopted in Brazil to combat the pandemic; and

the imposition of customs or other duties on essential equipment that is imported.

If any of these risks materialize, they may result in our inability to provide services to our customers in a timely manner or may affect the prices of our services, which may have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may be unable to respond to the trend towards consolidation in the Brazilian telecommunications market.

The Brazilian telecommunications market has been subject to consolidation. Mergers and acquisitions may change market dynamics, create competitive pressures and force small competitors to find partners, and may require us to adjust our operations, marketing strategies, and product portfolio. For example, in March 2015, Telefónica S.A., or Telefónica, acquired from Vivendi S.A., all of the shares of GVT Participações S.A., the controlling shareholder of Global Village Telecom S.A. This acquisition increased Telefónica’s share of the Brazilian telecommunications market, and we believe such trend is likely to continue in the industry as participants continue to pursue economies of scale. The entry of a new market participant with significant financial resources or potential changes in strategy by existing telecommunications service providers can change the competitive environment in the Brazilian market. We may be unable to keep pace with these changes, which could affect our ability to compete effectively and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Additional joint ventures, mergers and acquisitions among telecommunications service providers are possible in the future. If such consolidation occurs, it may result in increased competition within our market. We may be unable to adequately respond to pricing pressures resulting from consolidation in our market, adversely affecting our business, financial condition and results of operations. We may also consider engaging in merger or acquisition activity in response to changes in the competitive environment, which could divert resources away from other aspects of our business.

Our commitment to meet the obligations of our Brazilian employees’ pension plans, managed by Fundação Sistel de Seguridade Social and Fundação Atlântico de Seguridade Social may be higher than what is currently anticipated, and therefore, we may be required to make additional contributions of resources to these pension plans or to record liabilities or expenses that are higher than currently recorded.

As sponsors of certain private employee pension plans in Brazil, which are managed by Fundação Sistel de Seguridade Social, or Sistel, and Fundação Atlântico de Seguridade Social, or FATL, our subsidiaries cover the actuarial deficits of these pension benefit plans, which provide guaranteed benefits to our retirees in Brazil and guaranteed future benefits to our current Brazilian employees at the time of their retirement. As of December 31, 2019, our Brazilian pension benefit plans had an aggregate deficit of R$633 million. Our commitment to meet these deficit obligations may be higher than we currently anticipate, and we may be required to make additional contributions or record liabilities or expenses that are higher than we currently record, which may adversely affect our financial results. If the life expectancy of the beneficiaries should exceed the life expectancies included in the actuarial models, the level of our contributions to these plans could increase. If the managers of these plans should suffer losses on the investments of the assets of these plans, we would be required to make additional contributions to these plans in order for these plans to be able to provide the agreed benefits. Any increase in the level of our contributions to these plans as a result of an increase in life expectancy or a decline in investment returns could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. For a more detailed description of our Brazilian pension plans, see “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Employees—Employee Benefits—Pension Benefit Plans.”

As a result of the RJ Proceedings, certain of our unfunded obligations under our post-retirement plans were novated. As of December 31, 2019, we had recorded R$633 million on our balance sheet as “liability for pension benefits,” net of provision for unfunded status on our balance sheet, represented by the commitment under the terms of the RJ Plan related to the financial obligations agreement, entered into by Oi and FATL intended for the payment of the mathematical provision without coverage by the plan’s assets. For more information, see “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Employees—Employee Benefits—Pension Benefit Plans—Fundação Atlântico de Seguridade Social—TCSPREV Plan” and note 27 to our audited consolidated financial statements included in this annual report.

Risks Relating to Brazil

The Brazilian government has exercised, and continues to exercise, significant influence over the Brazilian economy. This influence, as well as Brazilian political and economic conditions, could adversely impact our business, results of operations and financial condition and the market prices of our Common Shares, preferred shares and ADSs.

Oi is a Brazilian corporation, and substantially all of our operations and customers are located in Brazil. Accordingly, our financial condition and results of operations are substantially dependent on Brazil’s economy. The Brazilian federal government frequently exercises significant influence over the Brazilian economy and occasionally makes significant changes in policy and regulations. The Brazilian government’s actions to control inflation and implement macroeconomic policies have often involved, among other measures, changes in interest rates, changes in tax policies, wage and price controls, foreign exchange controls, currency devaluations, blocking access to bank accounts, imposing capital controls and limits on imports. We do not have any control over, and are unable to predict, which measures or policies the Brazilian government may adopt in the future. Our business, results of operations and financial condition and the market price of our Common Shares, Preferred Shares and ADSs may be adversely affected by changes in government policies or regulations, especially those related to the telecommunications sector, such as changes in rates and competitive conditions, as well as general economic factors, including:

the rate of growth of the Brazilian economy;

economic, political or social instability;

fluctuating exchange rates;

inflation;

interest rates and monetary policies;

reductions in salaries or income levels and unemployment rates;

liquidity of domestic capital and lending markets;

energy policy;

exchange controls and restrictions on remittances abroad;

changes to the regulatory framework governing our industry;

fiscal policies and changes in tax laws;

labor and social security policies, laws and regulations; and

other political, diplomatic, social and economic developments in or affecting Brazil.

Uncertainty over whether the Brazilian federal government will implement changes to the policies, regulations or standards affecting these or other factors in the future may affect economic performance and contribute to economic uncertainty in Brazil and to heightened volatility in the Brazilian securities markets and securities issued abroad by Brazilian issuers, which may have an adverse effect on us and the trading price of our Common Shares, Preferred Shares and ADSs.

Ongoing political instability has adversely affected the Brazilian economy, our business and results of operations and may adversely affect the market price of our Common Shares, Preferred Shares and ADSs.

The Brazilian economy has been affected by political events in Brazil, which have also affected the confidence of investors and the public in general, adversely impacting the performance of the Brazilian economy and heightening the volatility of securities issued by Brazilian companies.

Brazilian markets have also experienced heightened volatility due to uncertainties derived from the ongoing investigations conducted by the Brazilian Federal Police and the Federal Prosecutor’s Office (Ministério PúblicoFederal), among which is Operation Car Wash (OperaçãoLava Jato). Such investigations have impacted the Brazilian economy and political environment. Numerous members of the Brazilian government and of the legislative branch, as well as senior officers of large state-owned and private companies, have been convicted of political corruption related to bribes by means of kickbacks on contracts granted by the government to several infrastructure, oil and gas and construction companies, among others. Profits of these kickbacks allegedly financed the political campaigns of political parties that were unaccounted for or not publicly disclosed, and served to further the personal enrichment of the recipients of the bribery schemes. As a result, a number of senior politicians, including former president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, congressmen and officers of the major state-owned and private companies in Brazil, resigned and/or have been arrested, and numerous senior elected officials and other public officials are being investigated for unethical and illegal behavior.

The outcome of these investigations is uncertain, but they have already had an adverse impact on the image and reputation of the implicated companies, and on the general market perception of Brazil. The development of these investigations has and may continue to adversely affect us. We cannot predict whether the ongoing investigations will affect the market or will lead to heightened economic and political volatility in Brazil, nor whether new investigations against politicians and/or officers of private companies will occur in the future.

In addition, in October 2018, Brazilians elected federal congressmen, state congressmen,two-thirds of the total number of senators and governors, and the president, and the new elected officials took office at the beginning of 2019. Following a divisive presidential race, Congressman Jair Bolsonaro became Brazil’s president on January 1, 2019.

Any continuation of such divisions could result in congressional deadlock, political unrest and massive demonstrations and/or strikes that could materially adversely affect our operations. Uncertainties in relation to the implementation by the new administration of changes relating to monetary, tax and pension funds policies, as well as to the relevant legislation that must be passed to implement them, may contribute to economic instability. These uncertainties and new measures may increase market volatility of Brazilian securities issued abroad.

The President of Brazil has the power to determine policies and issue governmental acts related to the Brazilian economy that affect the operations and financial performance of companies, including us. We cannot predict which policies the newly elected president will adopt or if these policies or changes in current policies may have an adverse effect on us or the Brazilian economy.

Fluctuations in exchange rates may lead to substantial losses on our liabilities denominated in or linked to foreign currencies.

Since 1999, exchange rates for thereal have been set by the market, i.e., a floating exchange rate system. Although long-term depreciation of thereal is generally linked to the rate of inflation in Brazil, depreciation of thereal occurring over shorter periods of time has resulted in significant variations in the exchange rate forbetween thereal, the U.S. dollar and other currencies. The exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the Brazilianreal has experienced significant fluctuations in recent years. Therealdepreciated against the U.S. dollar by 47.1% during 2015. During 2016, thereal appreciated against the U.S. dollar by 16.5% and thereal depreciated against the U.S. dollar by 1.5% in 2017, 17.1% in 2018, and 4.0% in 2019.

As of December 31, 2019, R$18,294 million, or 57.8%, of our total consolidated borrowings and financing was denominated in currencies other than thereal, excluding the fair value adjustment to our borrowings and financing and debt issuance costs, and R$9,521 million, or 52.2%, of our total consolidated borrowings and financing was denominated in currencies other than thereal, after giving effect to the fair value adjustment to our borrowings and financing and debt issuance costs. When thereal depreciates against foreign currencies, we incur losses on our liabilities denominated in foreign currencies, such as our U.S. dollar-denominated PIK Toggle Notes and export credit facilities, and we incur gains on our monetary assets denominated in or indexed to foreign currencies, as the liabilities and assets are translated intoreais into U.S. dollars was R$$3.9436 to US$1.00, based. On the other hand, when therealdepreciates against foreign currencies, we incur gains on the selling ratebalance of our fair value adjustment as reporteda consequence of the gross debt balance, which partially offsets the negative impact on our borrowings and financings. If significant depreciation of thereal were to occur when the value of such liabilities significantly exceeds the value of such assets, including any financial instruments entered into for hedging purposes, we could incur significant losses, even if the value of those assets and liabilities has not changed in their original currency. In addition, a significant depreciation in thereal could adversely affect our ability to meet certain of our payment obligations. A failure to meet certain of our payment obligations could trigger a default under certain financial covenants in our debt instruments, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

The significant depreciation of thereal subsequent to December 31, 2019, partially due to theCOVID-19 pandemic and the public health measures adopted to combat the pandemic in Brazil and internationally, is expected to have effects on our U.S. dollar-denominated indebtedness and interest expenses, negatively affecting our results of operations. Notwithstanding the adverse effects on the carrying amounts of our financial liabilities, we do not anticipate any substantial effect on our liquidity as there are few short-term payment obligations under our indebtedness, which we have hedged by continuing to hold a portion of the proceeds from our sale of PT Ventures in U.S. dollars. However, a prolonged deterioration of the value of thereal could adversely affect our ability to meet our payment obligations on our indebtedness when future amortization payments become due. A portion of our capital expenditures and operating leases require us to acquire assets or use third-party assets at prices denominated in or linked to foreign currencies, some of which are financed by liabilities denominated in foreign currencies, principally the U.S. dollar. We generally do not hedge exposures relating to our capital expenditures against risks related to movements of thereal against foreign currencies. To the extent that the value of thereal decreases relative to the U.S. dollar, it becomes more costly for us to purchase these assets or services, which could adversely affect our business and financial performance. Despite the 17.1% depreciation of thereal during 2018, the slow recovery of the Brazilian economy limited inflation and allowed the Central Bank of Brazil (Banco Central do Brasil), or the Brazilian Central Bank. The selling rate was R$3.8748 to US$1.00 on December 31, 2018, R$3.3080 to US$1.00 on December 31, 2017

Market Share and R$3.2591 to US$1.00 on December 31, 2016, in each case, as reported by the Brazilian Central Bank. The real/U.S. dollar exchange rate fluctuates widely, and the selling rate on April 23, 2019 may not be indicative of future exchange rates. See “Item 3. Key Information—Exchange Rates” for information regarding exchange rates for thereal since January 1, 2014.Other Information

Solely for the convenience of the reader, we have translated some amounts included in “Item 3. Key Information—Selected Financial Information” andWe make statements in this annual report about our market share and other information relating to the telecommunications industry in Brazil. We have made these statements on the basis of information obtained fromreais into third-party sources and publicly available information that we believe are reliable, such as information and reports from ANATEL, among others. Notwithstanding any investigation that we may have conducted with respect to the market share, market size or similar data provided by third parties or derived from industry or general publications, we assume no responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of any such information.

Rounding

We have made rounding adjustments to reach some of the figures included in this annual report. As a result, numerical figures shown as totals in some tables may not be arithmetic aggregations of the figures that precede them.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT WITH RESPECT TO FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This annual report contains forward-looking statements. Some of the matters discussed concerning our business operations and financial performance include forward-looking statements within the meaning of the U.S. dollars usingSecurities Act of 1933, as amended, or the selling rateSecurities Act, or the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as reported by amended, or the Exchange Act.

Statements that are predictive in nature, that depend upon or refer to future events or conditions or that include words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “estimates” and similar expressions are forward-looking statements. Although we believe that these forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions, these statements are subject to several risks and uncertainties and are made in light of information currently available to us.

Many important factors could cause our actual results to differ substantially from those anticipated in our forward-looking statements, including, among other things:

material adverse changes in economic conditions in Brazil or the other countries in which we have operations and investments;

the Brazilian Central Bankgovernment’s telecommunications policies that affect the telecommunications industry and our business in Brazil in general, including issues relating to the remuneration for the use of our network in Brazil, and changes in or developments of ANATEL regulations applicable to us;

the cost and availability of financing;

any judicial action that overturns or modifies the Brazilian Confirmation Order or declares the RJ Debtors bankrupt under Brazilian law and requires their liquidation;

the effects of intense competition in Brazil and the other countries in which we have operations and investments;

the general level of demand for, and changes in the market prices of, our services;

our ability to implement our corporate strategies in order to expand our customer base and increase our average revenue per user;

political, regulatory and economic conditions in Brazil, notably with respect to inflation, exchange rate fluctuation of thereal,interest rates fluctuation and the political environment in Brazil;

the adverse effects ofCOVID-19, and public health measures adopted to combat the pandemic in Brazil and internationally, on December 31, 2018our employees, our business operations (including our retail operations, our network operations, our network maintenance programs and our expansion programs), our third-party vendors and the ability of R$3.8748our customers to US$1.00. These translationspay for services on a timely basis;

the outcomes of legal and administrative proceedings to which we are or become a party;

changes in telecommunications technology that could require substantial or unexpected investments in infrastructure or that could lead to changes in our customers’ behavior; and

other factors identified or discussed under “Item 3. Key Information––Risk Factors.”

Our forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, and our actual results or other developments may differ materially from the expectations expressed in the forward-looking statements. As for forward-looking statements that relate to future financial results and other projections, actual results will be different due to the inherent uncertainty of estimates, forecasts and projections. Because of these uncertainties, potential investors should not be considered representations thatrely on these forward-looking statements.

We undertake no obligation to publicly update any such amountsforward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

PART I

ITEM 1.

IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS

Not applicable.

ITEM 2.

OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE

Not applicable.

ITEM 3.

KEY INFORMATION

Selected Financial Information

The following selected financial data have been could have been or could be converted into U.S. dollars at that or at any other exchange rate.

Financial Statements

We maintainderived from our books and records inreais. Our consolidated financial statementsstatements. The selected financial data as of December 31, 20182019 and 20172018 and for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. The selected financial data as of December 31, 2017 have been derived from our consolidated financial statements that are not included in this annual report. We have not included selected financial data as of or for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2016,2015 as such information cannot be provided on a restated basis without unreasonable effort or expense.

The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto, which we refer“Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” and “Presentation of Financial and Other Information.”

Oi has not paid any dividends and/or interest attributable to shareholders’ equity since January 1, 2014.

   For the Year Ended December 31, 
   2019  2018  2017 
   (in millions ofreais, except per share amounts
and as otherwise indicated)
 

Income Statement Data:

    

Net operating revenue

  R$20,136  R$22,060  R$23,790 

Cost of sales and services

   (15,315  (16,179  (15,669
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross profit

   4,821   5,881   8,121 

Selling expenses

   (3,548  (3,853  (4,103

General and administrative expenses

   (2,782  (2,739  (3,137

Other operating income (expenses), net

   (1,469  (4,557  (3,243
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating income (loss) before financial expenses, net, and taxes

   (2,977  (5,268  (2,361

Financial expenses, net

   (6,110  26,609   (3,197
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income (loss) before taxes

   (9,087  21,341   (5,558

Income tax and social contribution

   (8  3,275   (1,099
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

  R$(9,095 R$24,616  R$(6,656
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss) attributable to controlling shareholders

  R$(9,000 R$24,591  R$(6,365

Net income (loss) attributable tonon-controlling shareholders

   (95  24   (291

Net income (loss) applicable to each class of shares(1):

    

Common shares basic and diluted

   (8,765  22,036   (4,896

Preferred shares and ADSs basic and diluted

   (236  2,555   (1,469

Net income (loss) per share:

    

Common shares – basic and diluted

   (1.51  16.39   (9.42

Common ADSs – basic and diluted

   (7.57  81.94   (47.10

Preferred shares and ADSs – basic and diluted

   (1.51  16.39   (9.42

Weighted average shares outstanding (in thousands):

    

Common shares – basic and diluted

   5,788,447   1,344,686   519,752 

Preferred shares – basic and diluted

   155,615   155,915   155,915 

(1)

Basic and diluted earnings per share have been calculated using the “two class method.” See note 22 to our audited consolidated financial statements included in this annual report.

   As of December 31, 
   2019   2018   2017 
   (in millions ofreais) 

Balance Sheet Data:

      

Cash and cash equivalents

  R$2,082   R$4,385   R$6,863 

Short-term investments

   184    202    21 

Trade accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts

   6,335    6,517    7,367 

Assets held for sale

   4,391    4,923    4,675 

Total current assets

   17,993    21,313    23,748 

Property, plant and equipment, net

   38,911    28,426    26,989 

Non-current judicial deposits

   6,651    7,019    8,290 

Intangible assets, net

   3,998    6,948    8,351 

Total assets

   71,892    65,438    68,639 

Short-term borrowings and financing (including current portion of long-term debt)

   326    673    54,515 

Short-term leases payables

   1,510         

Short-term trade payables

   4,794    5,024    4,924 

Liabilities of assets held for sale

   494    527    354 

Total current liabilities

   11,836    10,689    67,892 

Long-term borrowings and financing

   17,900    15,777     

Long-term leases payables

   6,640         

Total liabilities

   54,095    42,542    82,152 

Share capital

   32,539    32,038    21,438 

Shareholders’ equity

   17,797    22,896    (13,513

Risk Factors

You should consider the following risks as our audited consolidated financial statements, are includedwell as the other information set forth in this annual report.report when evaluating an investment in our company. In general, investing in the securities of issuers in emerging market countries, such as Brazil, involves a higher degree of risk than investing in the securities of issuers in the United States. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us, or those that we currently deem to be immaterial, may also materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. Any of the following risks could materially affect us. In such case, the market price of the Common Shares, Preferred Shares and ADSs could be adversely affected.

Risks Relating to the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry and Regulatory Environment

The Brazilian telecommunications industry is highly regulated. Changes to these regulations have and may continue to adversely impact our business.

The Brazilian telecommunications industry is highly regulated by ANATEL. ANATEL regulates, among other things, rates, quality of service and universal service goals, as well as competition among telecommunications service providers. Changes in laws and regulations, grants of new concessions, authorizations or licenses or the imposition of additional universal service obligations, among other factors, may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. For more information, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry.”

We cannot predict whether ANATEL or the Brazilian government will adopt these or other telecommunications sector policies in the future, or the consequences of such policies on our business or the business of our competitors. In the event that any modification of the regulatory scheme or new regulations applicable to our company are adopted that increase the costs of compliance to our company, whether through capital expenditure requirements, increased service requirements, increased costs for renewal of our authorizations and licenses, increased exposure to regulatory penalties or otherwise, these modifications and regulations could have prepareda material adverse effect on our audited consolidatedbusiness, financial statementscondition and results of operations.

Our concession agreements and authorizations contain certain obligations, and our failure to comply with these obligations may result in accordancevarious fines and penalties being imposed on us by ANATEL.

Our local fixed-line and domestic long-distance concession agreements in Brazil contain terms reflecting the General Plan of Universal Service Goals (Plano Geral de Metas de Universalização), or the PGMU, the Quality Management Regulations (Regulamento de Gestão da Qualidade), or the RGQ, which was adopted by ANATEL in June 2013, and was partially superseded by the Quality of Telecommunications Services Regulation (Regulamento de Qualidade dos Serviços de Telecomunicações), or the RQUAL, in December 2019, and other regulations adopted by ANATEL, the terms of which could affect our financial condition and results of operations. Our local fixed-line concession agreements in Brazil also require us to meet certain network expansion, quality of service and modernization obligations in each of the Brazilian states in our service areas. In the event of noncompliance with United States generally accepted accounting principles,ANATEL targets in any one of these states, ANATEL can establish a deadline for achieving the targeted level of such service, impose penalties and, in extreme situations, terminate the applicable concession agreement for noncompliance with our quality and universal service obligations. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry—Our Services—Fixed-Line Telephone Services.”

In addition, our authorizations to provide personal mobile services contain certain obligations requiring us to meet network scope and quality of service targets. If we fail to meet these obligations, we may be fined by ANATEL until we are in full compliance with our obligations and, in extreme circumstances, our authorizations could be revoked by ANATEL. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry—Our Services—Mobile Telephone Services.”

On an almost weekly basis, we receive inquiries from ANATEL requiring information from us on our compliance with the various service obligations imposed on us by our concession agreements. If we are unable to respond satisfactorily to those inquiries or U.S. GAAP,comply with our service obligations under our concession agreements, ANATEL may commence administrative proceedings in connection with such noncompliance. We have received numerous notices of commencement of administrative proceedings from ANATEL, mostly due to our inability to achieve certain targets established in the assumptionPGMU and the RGQ. For more information, see “Item 8. Financial Information—Legal Proceedings—Civil Claims Relating to Oi S.A. and Our Brazilian Operations—Administrative Proceedings.”

Our concession agreements in Brazil are subject to periodic modifications by ANATEL, and we cannot assure you that the modifications to these concession agreements will not have adverse effects on our company.

We provide fixed-line telecommunications services in our Brazilian service areas pursuant to concession agreements with the Brazilian government. These concession agreements expire on December 31, 2025 and may be amended by the parties every five years prior to the expiration date. In connection with each five-year amendment, ANATEL has the right, following public consultations, to impose new terms and conditions in response to changes in technology, competition in the marketplace and domestic and international economic conditions. Under their existing terms, our concession agreements may be amended by December 2020 at the latest.

We cannot assure you that any future amendments to our concession agreements will not impose requirements on our company that will require us to undertake significant capital expenditures or will not modify the rate-setting procedures applicable to us in a manner that will significantly reduce the net operating revenue that we generate from our Brazilian fixed-line businesses. If the amendments to our Brazilian concession agreements have these effects, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

We cannot assure you that we will continue asbe able to convert our concessions into authorizations or renew our concessions in a going concern. Our audited consolidated financial statements have been auditedtimely or cost-effective manner.

On October 3, 2019, the President of Brazil signed Law No. 13,879, which amended the Brazilian General Telecommunications Law (Lei Geral das Telecomunicações), or the General Telecommunications Law, to allow, among other things, providers of fixed-line telecommunications services operating under a concession in accordance with Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or PCAOB, standards.

Under U.S. GAAP, our management isthe public regime to convert their concessions into authorizations to operate in the private regime and thereby eliminate a number of obligations currently imposed by the concession regime. In exchange, providers may be required to assess whether there are conditions or events, consideredassume obligations to make additional investments in their networks, primarily related to the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about ourexpansion of broadband services. The cost of the additional investments in exchange for the elimination of such obligations, would be subject to discussion between the parties, with ANATEL having the ability to continue asmake the final valuation. In addition, the new law permits providers to renew their concession for indefinite additional20-year periods, whereas previously only one20-year renewal period was allowed, provided that at least 30 months prior to each expiration date, the providers have complied with the obligations required of them under the applicable concession. Prior to the passage of Law No. 13,879, our concession agreements would have expired in 2025 without the possibility of renewal. In February 2020, ANATEL proposed regulations to implement Law No. 13,879, including the rules that will govern the conversion of concessions into authorizations. These proposed regulations are subject to a going concern within one year afterpublic consultation period that is expected to expire on April 30, 2020. We cannot predict when and to what extent these regulations will be adopted. Once these regulations are adopted, we expect that we will be able to migrate our financial statements are issued. Our management’s assessment ofpublic regime concessions into private-regime authorizations or renew our ability to continue as a going concern is discussed in note 2 to our audited consolidated financial statements. As ofconcessions, which would otherwise expire on December 31, 2018, we have fulfilled the obligations established in the RJ Plan within the established time limits. As a result the completion on January 25, 2019 of the capital increase that was mandated by the RJ Plan through the issuance of 3,225,806,451 Common Shares for an aggregate subscription price of R$4,000 million in our preemptive offering, our management believes that2025. However, as of the date of this annual report, we have sufficient resourcesnot decided which option to continuepursue and cannot predict the cost of pursuing any of these options. For more information about Law No. 13,879, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry—Public Regime—Amendments to operatethe General Telecommunications Law” and “Item 4. Information on the Company—Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry—Our Services—Fixed-Line Telephone Services.”

If we are not able to convert our concessions into authorizations or renew our concessions prior to the expiration of our existing concessions, we may be able to participate in competitive auctions for new concessions that the 12 months followingBrazilian government may choose to conduct. However, our existing fixed-line and domestic long-distance concession agreements will not entitle us to preferential treatment in these auctions, and we may not be able to secure new concessions for our existing service areas in any future auctions or such concessions may be on less favorable terms than our current concessions. In such cases, our business, financial condition and results of operations would be materially adversely affected.

The mobile telecommunications industry and participants in this industry, including us, may be required to adopt an extensive program of field measurements of radio frequency emissions and be subject to further regulation and/or claims based on concerns regarding potential health problems and interfere with medical devices.

Media and other entities have suggested that the electromagnetic emissions from mobile handsets and base stations may cause health problems. If consumers harbor health-related concerns, they may be discouraged from using mobile handsets. These concerns could have an adverse effect on the mobile telecommunications industry and, possibly, expose mobile services providers to litigation. We cannot assure you that further medical research and studies will refute a link between the electromagnetic emissions of mobile handsets and base stations, including on frequency ranges we use to provide mobile services, and these health concerns. Government authorities could increase regulation on electromagnetic emissions of mobile handsets and base stations, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. The expansion of our network may be affected by these perceived risks if we experience problems in finding new sites, which, in turn, may delay the expansion and may affect the quality of our services.

In July 2002, ANATEL enacted regulations that limit emission and exposure for fields with frequencies between 9 kHz and 300 GHz. In May 2009, Law No. 11,934 was enacted, which established the need for field measurements by telecommunications service providers of all radio-communication transmitting stations every five years with respect to emission and exposure to these fields. In September 2018, ANATEL published Resolution No. 700/2018, a regulation pursuant to Law No. 11,934 that makes field measurements mandatory by telecommunication service providers of all radio-communication transmission stations every five years beginning in 2019. In January 2019, ANATEL passed Act No. 458/2019 regarding the technical requirements of Resolution No. 700/2018. However, Act No. 458/2019 is not yet in full force because the measurement parameters have not yet been defined, and ANATEL has had difficulties implementing internal systems to monitor compliance. We are still evaluating the scope of the technical and financial impact of these new regulations on our company, as ANATEL has not yet defined all of the relevant technical requirements related to these regulations as of the date of this annual report.

Companies in the Brazilian telecommunication industry, including us, may be harmed by restrictions regarding the installation of new antennas for mobile services.

As of the date of this annual report, there are approximately 250 municipal laws in Brazil that limit the installation of new antennas for mobile service, which has been a barrier to the expansion of mobile networks. Those laws are meant to regulate issues related to zoning and the alleged effects of the radiation and radiofrequencies of the antennas. The federal law, that establishes new guidelines to create a consolidated plan for the installation of antennas was approved in 2015, however, it is still pending specific regulation. Despite the federal initiative, as long as the municipal laws remain unchanged, the risk of noncompliance with regulations and of having services of limited quality in certain areas continues to exist, which could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Additional antenna installation is also limited as a result of concerns that radio frequency emissions from base stations may cause health problems. See “—The mobile telecommunications industry and participants in this industry, including us, may be required to adopt an extensive program of field measurements of radio frequency emissions and be subject to further regulation and/or claims based on concerns regarding potential health problems and interfere with medical devices.”

The telecommunications industry is subject to frequent changes in technology. Our ability to remain competitive depends on our ability to implement new technology, and it is difficult to predict how new technology will affect our business.

Companies in the telecommunications industry must adapt to rapid and significant technological changes that are usually difficult to anticipate. The mobile telecommunications industry in particular has experienced rapid and significant technological development and frequent improvements in capacity, quality and data-transmission speed. We intendexpect that new products and technologies will emerge and that existing products and technologies will be further developed. For example, ANATEL is expected to prepareconduct auctions for radiofrequencies in the 5G spectrum during 2020. The advent of new products and technologies could have a variety of consequences. Our future success depends on our consolidatedability to anticipate and adapt in a timely manner to technological changes. Technological changes may render our equipment, services and technology obsolete or inefficient, which may adversely affect our competitiveness or require us to increase our capital expenditures in order to maintain our competitive position. These new products and technologies may reduce the price of our services by providing lower-cost alternatives and the creation of new digital services.

For example, personal mobility service providers in Brazil are experiencing increasing competition fromover-the-top, or OTT, providers, which provide content (such as WhatsApp, Skype and YouTube) over an internet connection rather than through a service provider’s network. OTT providers are becoming increasingly competitive as customers shift from mobile voice and SMS communications to internet-based voice and data communications through computers and smartphone or tablet applications. In addition, as providers of fixed and mobile telecommunications services, we face more legal, regulatory and tax barriers than providers of OTT services, increasing our costs in relation to these provides and preventing us from being able to fully compete with them.

We may not obtain the expected benefits of our investments if more advanced technologies are adopted by the market. Even if we adopt new technologies in a timely manner as they are developed, the cost of such technology may exceed the benefit to us, and we cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain our level of competitiveness.

Our operations depend on our ability to maintain, upgrade and operate efficiently our accounting, billing, customer service, information technology and management information systems and to rely on the systems of other carriers underco-billing agreements.

Our success largely depends on the continued and uninterrupted performance of our controls, network technology systems and of certain hardware. Our technical infrastructure (including our network infrastructure for mobile telecommunications services) is vulnerable to damage or interruption from information and telecommunication technology failures, power loss, floods, windstorms, fires, terrorism, intentional wrongdoing, human error and similar events. Our controls are dependent, not exclusively, on these technological systems and are also subject to interruptions and failures. Unanticipated problems with our controls, or at our facilities, system failures, hardware or software failures, computer viruses or hacker attacks could affect the quality of our services and cause service interruptions. Any of these occurrences could result in reduced user traffic and reduced revenue and could harm our levels of customer satisfaction, our reputation and compliance with certain of our regulatory obligations.

Sophisticated information and processing systems are vital to our growth and our ability to monitor costs, render monthly invoices for services, process customer orders, provide customer service and achieve operating efficiencies. We cannot assure you that we will be able to operate successfully and upgrade our accounting, information and processing systems or that these systems will continue to perform as expected. We have entered intoco-billing agreements with each long-distance telecommunications service provider that is interconnected to our networks in Brazil to include in our invoices the long-distance services rendered by these providers, and these providers have agreed to include charges owed to us in their invoices. Any failure in our accounting, information and processing systems, or any problems with the execution of invoicing and collection services by other carriers with whom we haveco-billing agreements, could impair our ability to collect payments from customers and respond satisfactorily to customer needs, which could adversely affect our business, financial statementscondition and results of operations.

We face various cyber-security risks that, if not adequately addressed, could have an adverse effect on our business.

We face various cyber-security risks that could result in business losses, including but not limited to contamination (whether intentional or accidental) of our networks and systems by third parties with whom we exchange data, equipment failures or unauthorized access to and loss of confidential customer, employee and/or proprietary data by persons inside or outside of our organization. We are also exposed to cyber attacks causing systems degradation or service unavailability, the penetration of our information technology systems and platforms byill-intentioned third parties, and infiltration of malware (such as computer viruses) into our systems.

The risks of cyber attacks has been exacerbated as a result of measures that we have adopted to combat theCOVID-19 pandemic, principally the institution of a “work-from-home” policy for our employees. Because our managers and employees have access to our information systems from their remote locations, the demands on our security systems have increased. Although we have implemented measures to prevent unauthorized access to our systems through the compromise of these remote access points, we cannot assure you that perpetrators of cyber attacks will be prevented from accessing our information systems in all cases.

Cyber attacks against companies have increased in frequency, scope and potential harm in recent years. Further, the perpetrators of cyber attacks are not restricted to particular groups or persons. These attacks may be committed by company employees or third parties operating in any region, including jurisdictions where law enforcement measures to address such attacks are unavailable or ineffective. We may not be able to successfully protect our operational and information technology systems and platforms against such threats. Further, as cyber attacks continue to evolve, we may incur significant costs in the attempt to modify or enhance our protective measures or investigate or remediate any vulnerability.

The inability to operate our networks and systems as a result of cyber attacks, even for a limited period of time, may result in significant expenses to us and/or a loss of market share to other telecommunications providers. The costs associated with a major cyber attack could include expensive incentives offered to existing customers and business partners to retain their business, increased expenditures on cyber-security measures and the use of alternate resources, lost revenues from business interruption and litigation. If we are unable to adequately address these cyber-security risks, our operating network and information systems could be compromised, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Risks Relating to Our Company

Our debt instruments contain covenants that could restrict our financing and operating flexibility and have other adverse consequences.

As of December 31, 2019, we had total outstanding borrowings and financing of R$31,642 million, excluding the fair value adjustment to our borrowings and financing and debt issuance costs, and R$18,227 million, after giving effect to the fair value adjustment and debt issuance costs. In addition, in accordanceFebruary 2020, an investor subscribed to an aggregate amount of R$2,500 million of Oi Mobile’snon-convertible debentures. We are subject to certain financial covenants under the instruments that govern our indebtedness that limit our ability to incur additional debt. The level of our consolidated indebtedness and the requirements and limitations imposed by these debt instruments could adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations. In particular, the terms of some of these debt instruments restrict or may restrict our ability, and the ability of our subsidiaries, to:

incur or guarantee additional debt;

grant liens over or pledge assets;

sell or dispose of assets;

merge or consolidate with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issuedanother company;

pay dividends or distributions on capital stock or repurchase capital stock; and

make certain acquisitions, mergers and consolidations.

These covenants could limit our ability to plan for or react to market conditions or to meet our operational or capital needs, which could reduce future net operating revenue and adversely affect our cash flows and profitability. Our ability to comply with these covenants may be affected by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). Forevents beyond our fiscal year endedcontrol, and we may have to curtail some operations to maintain compliance. As of December 31, 2010,2019, we includedwere in full compliance with our financial statements preparedcovenants under IFRS as partour financial instruments.

In addition, the failure of Oi and our annual reportrestricted subsidiaries to comply with these covenants could result in a default under our debt agreements, which could permit the holders to accelerate our obligation to repay the debt and may be cross-defaulted to other debt. Our assets or cash flow may not be sufficient to fully repay borrowings under our outstanding debt agreements if accelerated upon an event of default, and there is no guarantee that we would be able to repay, refinance or restructure the payments on Form20-F, applying IFRS 1, “First-time Adoption of International Reporting Standards,” consideringthose debt agreements.

Furthermore, our debt instruments with BNDES contain financial covenants that our previous primary GAAP was Brazilian GAAP and that January 1, 2009 wasrequire Oi to maintain five specified financial ratios, measured on a quarterly basis. Under these debt instruments, BNDES has the right to accelerate the debt if, at the date of transition to IFRS. Consequently, asthe financial covenants are tested, we are not a IFRS first-time adopter, we intend to include in our annual report on Form20-F for the fiscal year endedcompliance with any two of these ratios. At December 31, 2019, a reconciliation from U.S. GAAP to IFRS for the comparative balance sheet (i.e., as of December 31, 2018) and comparative income statement periods preceding the most recent fiscal year (i.e., for the year ended December 31, 2018) to present the changeswe were in the basis of presentation. However, we are already including in our December 31, 2018compliance with these financial statements a reconciliation from U.S. GAAP to IFRS of our equity and income statement for the year ended December 31, 2018, as described in note 1 to our audited consolidated financial statements.

covenants. As a result of the RJ Proceedings (which are considered to be similar in all substantive respects to proceedings under Chapter 11depreciation of thereal subsequent to December 31, 2019, partially due to theCOVID-19 pandemic and the public health measures adopted to combat the pandemic in Brazil and internationally, and the related effects on our U.S. Bankruptcy Codedollar-denominated indebtedness and interest expenses, we believed that it was probable that as of 1986, as amended, whichMarch 31, 2020, we refer to as the U.S. Bankruptcy Code),would not be in compliance with more than one of these financial ratios. In anticipation of these ratio breaches, on March 30, 2020 we have applied Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification 852 “Reorganizations”,obtained a waiver from BNDES. The cross-default or ASC 852, in preparing our audited consolidated financial statements. ASC 852 requires that financial statements separately disclose and distinguish transactions and events that are directly associated with our reorganization from transactions and events that are associated with the ongoing operations of our business. Accordingly, certain expenses, realized gains and losses, and provisions for losses that are realized or incurredcross-acceleration clauses in the RJ Proceedings have been recordedinstruments governing our other indebtedness (other than Oi Mobile’snon-convertible debentures) provide that an event of default under our debt instruments with BNDES do not trigger an event of default under our other indebtedness or enable the classification “Reorganization items, net” in our consolidated statements of operations. In addition, our prepetition obligationscreditors under other indebtedness to accelerate that may be impacted byindebtedness.

Under the RJ Proceedings based on our assessment of these obligations following the guidance of ASC 852 have been classified on our consolidated statement of financial position as “Liabilities subject to compromise.” Prepetition liabilities subject to compromisePlan, until February 5, 2023, we are required to be reported as theapply an amount allowed as a claim by the RJ Court, regardless of whether they may be settled for lesser amounts. Certain amounts initially recorded as liabilities subjectequivalent to compromise were adjusted and reclassified to reflect new legal terms and conditions established by the RJ Court. As a result100% of the effectivenessnet revenue from our sale of assets in excess of US$200 million to investments in our activities. Beginning on February 5, 2024, we are required to allocate to the repayment of debt instruments representing recoveries under the RJ Plan on February 5, 2018, the contingencies included as “Liabilities subjectan annual basis an amount equivalent to compromise” on our consolidated statement of financial position will be paid according to terms70% of the RJ Plan and were reclassified as current andnon-current “Provisions for contingencies” on our consolidated statement of financial position.

As a result of the completion on January 25, 2019 of the capital increase that was mandatedamount by the RJ Plan, for purposes of the preparation of our financial statements under U.S. GAAP, we are deemed to have emerged from the RJ Proceedings. Upon emergence on January 25, 2019, we would be required to adopt fresh-start accounting, as required by ASC 852. The adoption of fresh start accounting would require our company to assign the reorganization value to our assets and liabilities, in conformity with the guidance of ASC 805 applicable to business combinations. Under this guidance, our assets and liabilities would be adjusted to fair market values, with any excess recorded as goodwill. However, as we intend to report our consolidated financial statements as of dates and for the periods ending after January 1, 2019 in accordance with IFRS as issued by the IASB, we will not adopt fresh start accounting as there are no requirements under IFRS to do so.

We are also required to prepare financial statements in accordance with accounting practices adopted in Brazil, or Brazilian GAAP, which are based on:

the Brazilian Corporate Law (as defined below);

the rules and regulations of the Brazilian Securities Commission (Comissão de Valores Mobiliários), or the CVM, and the Brazilian Federal Accounting Council (Conselho Federal de Contabilidade); and

the accounting standards issued by the Brazilian Accounting Pronouncements Committee (Comitê de Pronunciamentos Contábeis).

Certain Defined Terms

General

Unless otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires, all references to:

“our company,” “we,” “our,” “ours,” “us” or similar terms are to Oi and its consolidated subsidiaries;

“ADSs” are to Common ADSs and Preferred ADSs;

“ANATEL” are to the Brazilian National Telecommunications Agency (Agência Nacional de Telecomunicações);

“Bratel” are to Bratel S.à r.l.;

“Brazil” are to the Federative Republic of Brazil;

“Brazilian Corporate Law” are to, collectively, Brazilian Law No. 6,404/76, as amended by Brazilian Law No. 9,457/97, Brazilian Law No. 10,303/01, and Brazilian Law No. 11,638/07;

“Brazilian government” are to the federal government of the Federative Republic of Brazil;

“Brazilian Ministry of Communication” are to the Brazilian Ministry of Science, Technology and Communication (Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovações e Comunicações);

“Common ADSs” are to American Depositary Shares, each representing five Common Shares;

“Common Shares” are to common shares of Oi;

“Copart 4” are to Copart 4 Participações S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Oi prior to its merger with and into Telemar in January 2019;

“Copart 5” are to Copart 5 Participações S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of Oi prior to its merger with and into Oi in March 2019;

“Oi” are to Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization;

“Oi Coop” are to Oi Brasil Holdings Coöperatief U.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of Oi;

“Oi Mobile” are to Oi Móvel S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Oi;

“Pharol” are to Pharol, SGPS, S.A. (formerly known as Portugal Telecom, SGPS, S.A.);

“Preferred ADSs” are to American Depositary Shares, each representing one Preferred Share;

“Preferred Shares” are to preferred shares of Oi;

“PTIF” are to Portugal Telecom International Finance B.V. – In Judicial Reorganization, a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of Oi, which PT Portugal transferred to us in anticipation of our sale of PT Portugal in 2015;

“PT Portugal” are to PT Portugal, SGPS, S.A., which we acquired on May 5, 2014 and sold on June 2, 2015;

“Telemar” are to Telemar Norte Leste S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of Oi;

“TmarPart” are to Telemar Participações S.A., which, prior to the capital increase of Oi on May 5, 2014, was the direct controlling shareholder of Oi and which merged with and into Oi on September 1, 2015; and

“TNL” are to Tele Norte Leste Participações S.A., a company that was directly controlled by TmarPart prior to its merger with and into Oi on February 27, 2012.

Judicial Reorganization

The following defined terms relate to our global judicial reorganization. For more information, see “Presentation of Financial and Other Information—Financial Restructuring,” and “Item 4. Information on the Company—Our Recent History and Development—Our Judicial Reorganization Proceedings.” Unless otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires, all references to:

“Ad Hoc Group” are to a diverse ad hoc group of holders of the bonds issued by Oi, Oi Coop and PTIF;

“ADWs” are to American Depositary Warrants;

“Backstop Investors” are to the members of the Ad Hoc Group, the IBC and certain other unaffiliated bondholders party to the Commitment Agreement;

“Bondholder” are each holder of beneficial interests in the bonds issued by Oi, Oi Coop and PTIF;

“Bondholder Credits” are to unsecured a claim held by a creditor pursuant to the RJ Plan evidenced by bonds issued by Oi, Oi Coop and PTIF;

“Brazilian Bankruptcy Law” are to Brazilian Law No. 11,101 of June 9, 2005;

“Brazilian Confirmation Date” are to February 5, 2018, the date in which the Brazilian Confirmation Order was published in the Official Gazette of the State of Rio de Janeiro (Diário Oficial do Estado do Rio de Janeiro);

“Brazilian Confirmation Order” are to the order entered by the RJ Court on January 8, 2018, ratifying and confirming the RJ Plan, but modifying certain provisions of the RJ Plan;

“Capitalization of Credits Capital Increase” are to the capital increase of between R$$11,765,562,892.10 and R$12,292,379,141.00 through the issuance of up to 1,756,054,163 New Shares, paid for by conversion of claims of Qualified Bondholders into New Shares, pursuant to Section 4.3.3.5 of the RJ Plan;

“Cash Capital Increase” are to the cash capital increase of R$4 billion provided for under Section 6 of the RJ Plan;

“Chapter 15 Debtors” are to Oi, Telemar, Oi Coop and Oi Mobile;

“Commitment Agreement” are to that certain commitment agreement, which we negotiated with members of the Ad Hoc Group, the IBC and certain other unaffiliated bondholders as part of the RJ Plan, under which such bondholders agreed to backstop an eventual cash capital increase by our company, which will be commenced following the full implementation of the RJ Plan;

“Default Recovery” are to the general treatment provided for unsecured credits under the RJ Plan. Under the RJ Plan, Bondholders that were not Eligible Bondholders, did not make a valid election of the form of recovery for their Bondholder Credits, or do not participate in the settlement procedures will only be entitled to the Default Recovery with respect to the Bondholder Credits represented by their Bonds.

“Defaulted Bonds” are to the bonds issued by Oi, Oi Coop and PTIF;

“Dutch District Court” are to the District Court of Amsterdam;

“Eligible Bondholders” are to every Bondholder that individualized its Bondholder Credits in accordance with the procedures established in the RJ Plan and by the RJ Court;

“GCM” are to a General Creditors’ Meeting of creditors of our company recognized by the RJ Court. A GMC was held on December 19 and 20, 2017 to consider and vote on the RJ Plan;

“IBC” means the International Bondholder Committee, a group of creditors in the Netherlands;

“Judicial Ratification of the RJ Plan” are to the confirmation of the RJ Plan by the RJ Court. As used in this annual report, the date of the Judicial Ratification of the RJ Plan means February 5, 2018 (i.e., the Brazilian Confirmation Date);provided that(1) in the event that any appeal of the Brazilian Confirmation Order is filed and a stay on the effectiveness of the Brazilian Confirmation Order is granted, the Brazilian Confirmation Date shall be deemed to occur the date on which such appeal is resolved; and (2) in the event that any appeal of the Brazilian Confirmation Order results in an appellate court overturning or modifying the Brazilian Confirmation Order, the Brazilian Confirmation Date shall be deemed to occur on the date on which the eventual appellate court’s decision, or that of a higher court (if further appeals of the appellate court’s decision are made), is published in such court’s official gazette. For more information about the appeals and motions for clarification filed with respect to the Brazilian Confirmation Order, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—Our Recent History and Development—Our Judicial Reorganization Proceedings—Approval of Judicial Reorganization Plan at GCM and Confirmation of Judicial Reorganization Plan by RJ Court;”

“New Notes” are to senior unsecured notes of Oi to be issued in accordance with the terms of Section 4.3.3.3 of the RJ Plan and Exhibit 4.3.3.3(f) thereto, in connection with the Capitalization of Credits Capital Increase;

“New Shares” are to newly issued common shares of Oi, which are expected to be issued in the form of ADSs, in connection with the Capitalization of Credits Capital Increase;

“Non-Qualified Bondholders” are to Eligible Bondholders with Bondholder Credits equal to or less than USD $750,000.00 (or the equivalent in other currencies);

“Non-Qualified Credit Agreement” are to a credit agreement to be entered into between the RJ Debtors and an administrative agent, in accordance with the terms of Section 4.3.3.1 of the RJ Plan and Exhibit 4.3.3.1(f) thereto;

“Non-Qualified Recovery” are to the entitlement of certainNon-Qualified Bondholders to elect to have their Bondholder Credits Satisfied through the distribution to suchNon-Qualified Bondholders of a participation interest in theNon-Qualified Credit Agreement;

“Oi Coop Composition Plan” are to the composition plan for Oi Coop providing for the restructuring of the claims against Oi Coop in the Netherlands in substantially the same terms and conditions as the RJ Plan;

“PTIF Composition Plan” are to the composition plan for PTIF providing for the restructuring of the claims against PTIF in the Netherlands in substantially the same terms and conditions as the RJ Plan;

“PTIF Shares” are to common shares of Oi currently held by PTIF, which may be issued in the form of American Depositary Receipts;

“Qualified Bondholders” are to Eligible Bondholders with Bondholder Credits greater than US$750,000.00 (or the equivalent in other currencies);

“Qualified Recovery” are to the entitlement of certain Qualified Bondholders to elect to have their Bondholder Credits satisfied through the distribution to such Qualified Bondholders of a combination of New Notes, New Shares, PTIF Shares and Warrants in amounts determined based on the Bondholder Credits evidenced by the Bonds of each series held by a Bondholder, in accordance with Section 4.3.3.2 of the RJ Plan;

“RJ Court” are to the 7th Commercial Court of the Judicial District of the State Capital of Rio de Janeiro. The RJ Court is adjudicating the judicial reorganization proceedings in Brazil involving the RJ Debtors.

“RJ Debtors” are to Oi, Telemar, Oi Mobile, Oi Coop, PTIF, Copart 4 and Copart 5;

“RJ Plan” are to the judicial reorganization plan, as amended, of the RJ Debtors that was filed with the RJ Court and, on December 20, 2017, approved by a significant majority of creditors of each class present at the GCM held on December 19 and 20, 2017;

“RJ Proceedings” are to the Brazilian proceedings for judicial reorganization (recuperação judicial) involving the RJ Debtors that are being adjudicated by the RJ Court, pursuant to a joint voluntary petition for judicial reorganization pursuant to the Brazilian Bankruptcy Law filed by the RJ Debtors with the RJ Court initially on June 20, 2016. On June 29, 2016, the RJ Court granted the processing of the RJ Proceedings of the RJ Debtors;

“U.K. Recognition Orders” are to the orders granted by the High Court of Justice of England and Wales on Jun 23, 2016 recognizing the RJ Proceedings as a foreign main proceedings under the Cross-Border Insolvency Regulations 2006, which implements the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency in Great Britain, in relation to Oi, Telemar and Oi Mobile;

“U.S. Bankruptcy Court” are to the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York;

“U.S. Recognition Order” are to the order granted by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court on July 22, 2016 recognizing the RJ Proceedings as the foreign main proceedings in respect of each of the Chapter 15 Debtors; and

“Warrants” are to warrants (bonus de subscrição) to acquire newly issued common shares of Oi, which Warrants may distributed in the form of American Depository Warrants, as further described in Section 4.3.3.6 of the RJ Plan.

Financial Restructuring

In June 2016, after considering the challenges arising from our economic and financial situation in connection with the maturity schedule of our financial debts, the threats to our cash flows represented by imminent attachments or freezing of assets in judicial lawsuits, and the urgent need to adopt measures that protect our company, we concluded that filing of a request for judicial reorganization (recuperação judicial) in Brazil would be the most appropriate course of action (1) to preserve the continuity of our offering of quality services to our customers, within the rules and commitments undertaken with ANATEL, (2) to preserve the value of our company, (3) to maintain the continuity of our operations and corporate activities in an organized manner that protects the interests of our company, customers, shareholders and other stakeholders, and (4) to protect our cash and cash equivalents.equivalents and financial investments at the end of each fiscal year exceeds (2) the greater of (a) 25% of our operating expenses and capital expenses for that fiscal year, and (b) R$5,000 million, subject to adjustment in the event that we conclude any capital increases. The cash required to make these repayments will reduce the amount available to us to make capital expenditures.

The RJ Plan permits us to borrow up to R$2 billion under new export credit facilities, as described under “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Liquidity and Capital Resources.” This debt may be denominated inreais or in foreign currencies. Accordingly, we may incur interest expenses and foreign exchange gains and losses in connection with this new debt. A significant increase in any of these interest rates could adversely affect our financial expenses and negatively affect our overall financial performance.

If the Brazilian Confirmation Order is overturned or modified, the RJ Debtors may be declared bankrupt under Brazilian law and liquidated.

On June 20, 2016, Oi, together with the other RJ Debtors, filed a joint voluntary petition for judicial reorganization pursuant to the Brazilian Bankruptcy Law with the RJ Court, pursuant to an urgent measure approved by our board of directors.

On December 19 and 20, 2017, thea GCM was held to consider approval of the RJ Plan. Themost recently filed judicial reorganization plan. This GCM concluded on December 20, 2017 following the approval of the RJ Plan reflecting amendments to the RJ Planjudicial reorganization plan presented at thethis GCM as negotiated during the course of thethis GCM.

On January 8, 2018, the RJ Court entered the Brazilian Confirmation Order, ratifying and confirming the RJ Plan, according to its terms, but modifying certain provisions of the RJ Plan. The Brazilian Confirmation Order was published in the Official Gazette of the State of Rio de Janeiro on February 5, 2018, the Brazilian Confirmation Date. For more information with respect to the RJ Proceedings, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—Our Recent History and Development—Our Judicial Reorganization Proceedings.”

The Brazilian Confirmation Order, according to its terms, is currently binding on all parties, as long as its effects are not stayed.although it is subject to six pending appeals with no suspensive effect attributed to those appeals. By operation of the RJ Plan and the Brazilian Confirmation Order, provided that the Brazilian Confirmation Order is not overturned or altered as a result of the pending appeals filed against it by certain creditors, the unsecured claims against the RJ Debtors have been novated and discharged under Brazilian law and holders of such claims have receivedare entitled only to receive the recoveries set forth in the RJ Plan in exchange for their claims in accordance with the terms and conditions of the RJ Plan.

If the Brazilian Confirmation Order is overturned or modified and, as a result, the RJ Debtors are declared bankrupt, which under Brazilian law is generally followed by a liquidation of the debtors’ assets, the rights and guarantees of the creditors recognized by the RJ Court will be restored under the original terms as if the RJ Plan had never been approved, net of amounts validly received pursuant to the RJ Plan, in accordance with Brazilian Bankruptcy Law. A modification of the Brazilian Confirmation Order may lead to a breach of the RJ Plan by the RJ Debtors. In case of breach of the RJ Plan by the RJ Debtors, creditors will be entitled to (1) approve a modification to the RJ Plan at a meeting of creditors complying with the quorum requirements established in the Brazilian Bankruptcy Law, or (2) seek to have the RJ Debtors adjudicated as bankrupt by the RJ Court.

We are subject to numerous legal and administrative proceedings, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We are subject to numerous legal and administrative proceedings. It is difficult to quantify the potential impact of these legal and administrative proceedings. We classify our risk of loss from legal and administrative proceedings as “probable,” “possible” or “remote.” We make provisions for probable losses but do not make provisions for possible and remote losses.

As of December 31, 2019, we had provisioned R$5,252 million for probable losses relating to various tax, labor and civil legal and administrative proceedings against us. As of December 31, 2019, we had claims against us of R$28,416 million in tax proceedings, R$798 million in labor proceedings and R$1,668 million in civil proceedings with a risk of loss classified as “possible” for which we had made no provisions. We are not required to disclose or record provisions for proceedings in which our management judges the risk of loss to be remote. However, the amounts involved in certain of the proceedings in which we believe our risk of loss is remote could be substantial. Consequently, our losses could be significantly higher than the amounts for which we have recorded provisions.

If we are subject to unfavorable decisions in any legal or administrative proceedings and the losses in those proceedings significantly exceed the amount for which we have provisioned or involve proceedings for which we have made no provision, our results of operations and financial condition may be materially adversely affected. Even for the amounts recorded as provisions for probable losses, a judgment against us would have an effect on our cash flow if we are required to pay those amounts. Unfavorable decisions in these legal proceedings may, therefore, reduce our liquidity and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. For a more detailed description of these proceedings, see “Item 8. Financial Information—Legal Proceedings.”

We have indemnification obligations with respect to the PT Exchange Agreement and the PT Portugal disposition that could materially adversely affect our financial position.

In the exchange agreement, or the PT Exchange Agreement, that we entered into with Pharol under which we transferred defaulted commercial paper of Rio Forte Investments S.A., or Rio Forte, to Pharol in exchange for the delivery to our company of Common Shares and Preferred Shares as described under “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—Major Shareholders—PT Option Agreement,” we agreed to indemnify Pharol against any loss arising from (1) Pharol’s contingent or absolute tax or anti-trust obligations in relation to the assets contributed to our company in the Oi capital increase in connection with which we acquired PT Portugal from Pharol in May 2014 and (2) Pharol’s management activities, with reference to acts or triggering events occurring on or prior to May 5, 2014, excluding any losses incurred by Pharol as a result of the financial investments in the Rio Forte commercial paper and the acquisition of the Rio Forte commercial paper from Oi under the PT Exchange Agreement.

In the share purchase agreement under which we sold PT Portugal in the PT Portugal disposition, we agreed to indemnify Altice Portugal for breaches of our representations and warranties under the share purchase agreement, subject to certain customary procedural and financial limitations. There can be no assurance that we will not be subject to significant claims under these indemnification provisions and if we are subject to such claims under these indemnification provisions, we could be required to pay significant amounts, which would have an adverse effect on our financial condition.

In the PT Ventures Share Purchase Agreement under which we sold PT Ventures to Sociedade Nacional de Combustíveis de Angola, Empresa Pública – Sonangol E.P., or Sonangol, we agreed to indemnify Sonangol for breaches of our representations and warranties under the PT Ventures Share Purchase Agreement, subject to certain customary procedural and financial limitations. There can be no assurance that we will not be subject to significant claims under these indemnification provisions and if we are subject to such claims under these indemnification provisions, we could be required to pay significant amounts, which would have an adverse effect on our financial condition.

We are subject to credit risks with respect to our customers. If we are unable to limit payment delinquencies by our customers, or if delinquent payments by our customers increase, our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

Our business significantly depends on our customers’ ability to pay their bills and comply with their obligations to us. During 2019, we recorded provisions for doubtful accounts in the amount of R$489 million, or 2.4% of our net operating revenue, primarily due to subscribers’ delinquencies. As of December 31, 2019, our provision for doubtful accounts was R$774 million.

ANATEL regulations allow us to implement certain policies to reduce customer defaults, such as service restrictions or limitations on the types of services provided based on a subscriber’s credit record. If we are unable to successfully implement policies to limit delinquencies of our Brazilian subscribers or otherwise select our customers based on their credit records, persistent subscriber delinquencies and bad debt will continue to adversely affect our operating and financial results.

In addition, if the Brazilian economy declines due to, among other factors, a reduction in the level of economic activity, an increase in inflation or an increase in domestic interest rates, a greater portion of our customers may not be able to pay their bills on a timely basis. For example, although do not have sufficient experience with the effects of the public health measures adopted in Brazil in response to theCOVID-19 pandemic to reliably estimate the quantitative effects of these measures, we expect that these public health measures will have significant impacts on the income and purchasing power of many of our subscribers, particularlylow-income subscribers and SMEs, some of whom may cease operations. Any increase in expected losses on trade receivables would adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

We are dependent on key personnel and the ability to hire and retain additional personnel.

We believe that our success will depend on the continued services of our senior management team and other key personnel. Our management team is comprised of highly qualified professionals, with extensive experience in the telecommunications industry. The loss of the services of any of our senior management team or other key employees could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. We also depend on the ability of our senior management and key personnel to work effectively as a team.

Our future success also depends on our ability to identify, attract, hire, train, retain and motivate highly skilled technical, managerial, sales and marketing personnel. Competition for such personnel is intense, and we cannot guarantee that we will successfully attract, assimilate or retain a sufficient number of qualified personnel. Failure to retain and attract the necessary technical, managerial, sales and marketing and administrative personnel could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The outcome of Operation Mine Map, a criminal investigation being conducted by Brazilian authorities that involves historical agreements of our company with certain entities, and any further investigations that may be commenced related to these agreements, could have a material adverse effect on our company.

On December 10, 2019, the Brazilian Federal Police launched Operation Mine Map (OperaçãoMapa da Mina). One of the main targets of Operation Mine Map was Fábio da Silva, son of former president Luiz Ignácio Lula da Silva. The subject of the investigation includes payments made by us to two groups of companies, Gamecorp and Grupo Gol. Brazilian authorities allege that these payments were made in exchange for benefits from the Brazilian government. In connection with the investigation, our headquarters and some other buildings in the States of São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro and in Brasília were searched and documents were seized relating to our business with Gamecorp and Grupo Gol.

We have been cooperating with Brazilian authorities involved in Operation Mine Map and have provided information and documents. We have not been notified that we are a target of any investigation relating to Operation Mine Map. None of our current executive officers or members of our board of directors were involved in our historical relationships with Gamecorp and Grupo Gol.

We cannot predict when the Operation Mine Mapinvestigation will be completed or the results of such investigation, including whether any litigation or enforcement action will be brought against us or the outcome or impact of any resulting litigation or enforcement action, nor can we predict any potential actions that may be taken by the relevant authorities. Any adverse development in the Operation Mine Mapinvestigation could subject us to potential fines or penalties under applicable law, materially adversely affect our public reputation, and could have a material adverse effect on us, including: (1) threatening our ability to obtain new financing, which could impair our ability to operate our business; and (2) shifting management’s focus to these matters, which could harm our ability to meet our strategic objectives. Additionally, while we have taken, and are continuing to take, measures to enhance our compliance programs, which are intended to assist us in detecting and preventing bribery and corruption, there can be no assurance that these efforts will enable us to detect or prevent all such activities.

We could be adversely affected by violations of anti-corruption laws and regulations.

We are required to comply with Brazilian anti-corruption laws and regulations, including Brazilian Law No. 12,846/2013, or the Brazilian Anti-Corruption Law, as well as anti-corruption laws and regulations in other jurisdictions, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, or the FCPA.

The Brazilian Anti-Corruption Law, the FCPA and similar anti-corruption laws in other jurisdictions generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to government officials or other persons for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. Recent years have seen a substantial increase in anti-corruption law enforcement activity, with more frequent and aggressive investigations and enforcement proceedings by both the U.S. Department of Justice and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, increased enforcement activity bynon-U.S. regulators, and increases in criminal and civil proceedings brought against companies and individuals. Our policies mandate compliance with these anti-corruption laws. We operate, through our businesses, in countries that are recognized as having governmental and commercial corruption. We cannot assure you that our internal control policies and procedures will protect us from reckless or criminal acts committed by our employees, the employees of any of our businesses, or third party intermediaries. In the event that we believe or have reason to believe that our employees or agents have or may have violated applicable anti-corruption laws, including the FCPA, we may be required to investigate or have outside counsel investigate the relevant facts and circumstances, which can be expensive and require significant time and attention from senior management. Violations of these laws may result in criminal or civil sanctions, inability to do business with existing or future business partners (either as a result of express prohibitions or to avoid the appearance of impropriety), injunctions against future conduct, profit disgorgements, disqualifications from directly or indirectly engaging in certain types of businesses, the loss of business permits or other restrictions which could disrupt our business and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

Risks Relating to Our Operations

We face significant competition in the Brazilian market and increasing competition from other services, which may adversely affect our results of operations.

We face increasing competition throughout Brazil from other telecommunications service providers in each of our core service businesses. In our Residential Services business, we compete with other fixed-line voice service providers, primarily Claro S.A., or Claro, a subsidiary of América Móvil S.A.B. de C.V., and Telefônica Brasil S.A., a subsidiary of Telefónica S.A., or Telefônica Brasil. In addition to Claro and Telefônica Brasil, our Residential Services business competes for broadband subscribers with a myriad of smaller local and regional broadband services providers. Finally, our Residential Services business competes forPay-TV broadband subscribers with Claro and SKY Brasil Serviços Ltda., or SKY, and Telefônica Brasil. In our Personal Mobility Services business, we compete with Telefônica Brasil, Claro, and TIM Participações S.A., a subsidiary of Telecom Italia S.p.A., or TIM. In our Business to Business, or B2B, Services business, we compete with all of these competitors for small- andmedium-sized enterprise, or SME, and corporate subscribers (including governmental entities) for our fixed-line and mobile services.

Our primary competitors, Telefônica Brasil, TIM and Claro are each controlled by multinational companies that may have more significant financial and marketing resources, and greater abilities to access capital on a timely basis and on more favorable terms, than our company.

As a result of competition from mobile services, we expect (1) the number of our fixed lines in service to continue to decline as some of our customers eliminate their fixed-line services in favor of mobile services, and (2) the use of existing fixed lines for making voice calls to decline, as customers replace fixed-line calls in favor of calls on mobile phones as a result of the emergence of“all-net” plans, which allow a customer to make calls to any fixed-line or mobile device of any operator for a flat monthly fee. The reduction in the number of our fixed lines in service has negatively affected and is likely to continue to negatively affect our net operating revenue and margins.

The primary drivers of competition in the broadband industry are stability and quality of the service, speed and price, with discounts typically offered in the form of bundled services. Claro and Telefônica Brasil each offer broadband services at higher speeds than ours and both offer integrated voice, broadband andPay-TV services, typically as bundles, to the residential services market through a single network infrastructure. In addition, an increasing number of small local and regional providers are competing in the broadband space offeringfiber-to-the-home, or FTTH, at competitive prices. Future offerings by our competitors that are aggressively priced or that offer additional services could have an adverse effect on our net operating revenue and our results of operations.

We offerPay-TV services throughout the regions in which we provide residential services. ThePay-TV market in Brazil has been facing a steady drop in the number of subscribers since 2015 as a result of the financial crisis, piracy, and an increase in the cord-cutting effect resulting from more widespread use of OTT services in Brazil, such as Netflix, Amazon Prime Video, HBO Go and others.

We and each of our principal competitors in the mobile telecommunications market offer Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS), or 3G, and our Long Term Evolution (LTE), or 4G, mobile telecommunications network technology. Our competitors have a much larger coverage footprint (in terms of cities covered) than we do both in 3G and 4G. In addition, the cost of maintaining our revenue share in this market may increase and in the future we may incur higher advertising and other costs as we attempt to maintain or expand our market presence. As mobile interconnection, or MTR, tariffs have declined in recent years, a trend towards SIM card consolidation has developed, reversing the trend of customers using multiple SIM cards to participate inon-net calling plans offered by multiple service providers; this trend has resulted, and may continue to result in, a decline in the size of our customer base. Acquiring each additional personal mobility customer entails costs, including sales commissions and marketing costs. Recovering these costs depends on our ability to retain such customers. Therefore, high rates of customer churn could have a material adverse effect on the profitability of our Personal Mobility Services business. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the average monthly churn rate of our Personal Mobility Services business, representing the number of subscribers whose service was disconnected during each month, whether voluntarily or involuntarily, divided by the number of subscribers at the beginning of such month, was 3.28% per month. Our inability to compete effectively to maintain and increase our market share in this market could adversely affect our net operating revenue and profitability.

Our mobile subscribers are demanding higher quality and more data availability, which require higher investments in development, modernization, expansion and continuous improvement in service quality and customers’ experience. As discussed above, some of our competitors may have greater access to cheaper capital and the ability to invest in new technologies, including 4.5G and 700 MHz frequencies. Oi is the only operator in the market that does not have a license for the 700 MHz frequency.

As a result of the increased availability of 4G mobile network technology, there has been an increase in the use of OTT services in Brazil, including instant internet messaging and Voice over Internet Protocol, or VoIP, and services on smartphone applications such as Facebook Messenger and WhatsApp. OTT applications are often free of charge, other than for data usage, accessible by smartphones, tablets and computers and allow their users to have access to potentially unlimited messaging and voice services over the internet, bypassing more expensive traditional voice and messaging services such astwo-way short (or text) message services known as SMS, which have historically been, but are no longer a source of significant revenues. With the growing use of smartphones in Brazil, an increasing number of customers are using OTT application services as a substitute for traditional voice or SMS communications. As a result, we see the migration of traffic from voice to data and consequently the introduction of offers from almost all competitors of unlimited voice plans in their portfolio, accelerating the process of commoditization of voice service. These trends could have an adverse effect on the average revenue per unit, or ARPU, generated by our mobile customer base and our profitability.

TheCOVID-19 pandemic could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

Since December 2019,SARS-CoV-2, a novel strain of coronavirus referred to asCOVID-19, has spread throughout the world. On January 31, 2020, the World Health Organization announced thatCOVID-19 was a global health emergency and on March 3, 2020, the World Health Organization categorizedCOVID-19 as a pandemic. TheCOVID-19 pandemic has resulted in numerous deaths and the imposition of local, municipal and national governmental“shelter-in-place” and other public health measures, border closures and other travel restrictions, causing unprecedented economic disruption in much of the world, including in Brazil.

The local, national and international response to the virus is quickly developing, fluid and uncertain. During March and April of 2020, state, local and municipal authorities within Brazil promoted and enforced public health measures, including social isolation and quarantine measures, and have enacted regulations limiting the operations of“non-essential” businesses. Inmid-March 2020, Rio de Janeiro and other Brazilian states declared a state of emergency. Although the Brazilian government has determined that the telecom sector is an essential service, which allows us to continue our field maintenance activities without violating restrictions on movement that have generally been imposed to combat the pandemic, in accordance with the recommendations of the authorities, we transitioned a substantial majority of our employees to work from home.

Although we have devoted considerable resources to preventative measures in order to reduce the potential impacts of theCOVID-19 pandemic on our employees, business, service and operations, there can be no assurance that these measures will be effective or that the pandemic will not have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. For example, public health measures could affect our network quality in the event that our networks are unable to meet increased demand as a result of orders from the authorities that individuals stay at or work at home. In addition, sales of certain of our products and services, such as services offered throughdoor-to-door sales channels and sales made through our retail stores, will be reduced as a result of public health measures, which could negatively impact us. The impact of public health measures adopted in Brazil on the income and purchasing power of our subscribers, particularlylow-income subscribers and SMEs, some of whom may cease operations, could reduce their ability to pay us for services, which could result in a decline in our cash flows from operations and an increase in our expected losses on trade receivables. If any applicable governmental body imposes rules preventing our termination services as a result ofnon-payment, thus encouraging customer defaults on invoices, such measures are likely to result in a decline in our cash flows from operations and an increase in our expected losses on trade receivables. Finally, as a result of restrictions on certain activities, it is possible that our personnel may be unable to perform routine maintenance and installation activities, which could adversely affect our operations and sales. For more information regardingabout specific measures that we have adopted and potential impacts on our business operations, see “Item. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Principal Factors Affecting Our Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Potential Effects of theCOVID-19 Pandemic.

We cannot predict the full effect of the pandemic on our business or on the Brazilian economy. Federal, state and municipal governments in Brazil may announce further restrictions on the general population and we cannot predict what effect this will have on our operations and sales in the long term. We cannot predict the duration of the pandemic, the effectiveness of governmental or other measures taken to attempt to curb the pandemic, or the duration of any such measures. In addition, following the pandemic and the termination of any such governmental restrictions, the needs and preferences of our customers may have been altered. None of the losses incurred or to be incurred by us as a result of theCOVID-19 pandemic, whether as a result of business interruption or inability to attract new customers, is covered by insurance currently held by us. As a result, any such losses could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

We may be unable to implement our plans to expand and enhance our existing networks in Brazil in a timely manner or without unanticipated costs, which could hinder or prevent the successful implementation of our business plan and result in revenues and net income being less than expected.

Our business as a telecommunications services provider depends on our ability to maintain and expand our telecommunications services network. Our ability to achieve our strategic objectives depends in large part on the successful, timely and cost-effective implementation of our plans to expand and enhance our networks in Brazil. We believe that our expected growth will require, among other things:

continuous development of our operational and administrative systems;

efficiently allocating our capital;

increasing marketing activities;

improving our understanding of customer wants and needs;

continuous attention to service quality; and

attracting, training and retaining qualified management, technical, customer relations, and sales personnel.

We believe that these requirements will place significant demand on our managerial, operational and financial resources. Factors that could affect our implementation of our growth strategy include:

our ability to generate cash flow or to obtain future financing necessary to implement our projects;

delays in the delivery of telecommunications equipment by our vendors, which could be exacerbated by the effects of theCOVID-19 pandemic on the operations of our equipment suppliers;

the failure of the telecommunications equipment supplied by our vendors to comply with the expected capabilities;

the failure to obtain licenses necessary for our projects; and

delays resulting from the failure of third-party suppliers or contractors to meet their obligations in a timely and cost-effective manner, which could be exacerbated by the effects of theCOVID-19 pandemic on the operations of our third-party suppliers or contractors.

Although we believe that our cost estimates and implementation schedule are reasonable and have not been affected by factors relating to theCOVID-19 pandemic, we cannot assure you that the actual costs or time required to complete the implementation of these projects will not substantially exceed our current estimates, particularly if theCOVID-19 pandemic increases in severity or extends over a prolonged period of time. Any significant cost overrun or delay could hinder or prevent the successful implementation of our business plan and result in revenues and net income being less than expected. Failure to manage successfully our expected growth could reduce the quality of our services, with adverse effects on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We make investments based on demand forecasts that may become inaccurate due to economic volatility and may result in revenues that are lower than expected.

We make certain investments, such as the procurement of materials and the development of our network infrastructure, based on our forecasts of the amount of demand that customers will have for our services at a later date. However, any major changes in the Brazilian economic scenario may affect this demand and therefore our forecasts may turn out to be inaccurate. For example, economic impacts of theCOVID-19 pandemic and the public health measures adopted in Brazil to combat this pandemic, economic crises that restrict credit to the population, and uncertainties relating to employment may result in a delay in the decision to acquire new products or services (such as broadband orPay-TV). As a result, it is possible that we may make larger investments based on demand forecasts than were necessary given actual demand at the relevant time, which may directly affect our cash flow.

Furthermore, improvements in economic conditions may have the opposite effect. For example, an increase in demand not accompanied by our investment in improved infrastructure may result in a possible loss of opportunity to increase our revenue or result in the degradation of the quality of our services.

We rely on strategic suppliers of equipment, materials and certain services necessary for our operations and expansion. If these suppliers fail to provide equipment, materials or services to us on a timely basis, we could experience disruptions, which could have an adverse effect on our revenues and results of operations.

We are in the process of vendor consolidation by using only on a few strategic and most representative technology suppliers around the world to provide us with equipment and materials that we need in order to expand and to operate our business in Brazil. In addition, we rely on a third-party provider of network maintenance services in certain regions where we operate. There are a limited number of suppliers with the capability of providing the mobile network equipment and fixed-line network platforms that our operations and expansion plans require or the services that we require to maintain our networks. In addition, because the supply of mobile network equipment and fixed-line network platforms requires detailed supply planning and this equipment is technologically complex, it would be difficult for our company to replace the suppliers of this equipment. Suppliers of cables that we need to extend and maintain our networks may suffer capacity constraints or difficulties in obtaining the raw materials required to manufacture these cables. As a result, we are exposed to risks associated with these suppliers, including restrictions of production capacity for equipment and materials, availability of equipment and materials, delays in delivery of equipment, materials or services, and price increases, many of which may be exacerbated by the effects of theCOVID-19 pandemic and public health measures in Brazil and internationally to combat the pandemic. If these suppliers or vendors fail to provide equipment, materials or services to us on a timely basis or otherwise in compliance with the terms of our contracts with these suppliers, we could experience disruptions or declines in the quality of our services, which could have an adverse effect on our revenues and results of operations, and we might be unable to satisfy the requirements contained in our concession and authorization agreements.

Certain essential equipment is subject to risks related to importation, and we acquire other essential equipment from a limited number of domestic suppliers, which may further limit our ability to acquire such essential equipment in a timely and cost effective manner.

The high growth in data markets in general, and broadband in particular, may result in a limited supply of equipment essential for the provision of such services, such as data transmission equipment and modems. The restrictions on the number of manufacturers imposed by the Brazilian government for certain essential equipment, mainly data transmission equipment and modems, and the geographical locations ofnon-Brazilian manufacturers of this essential equipment, pose certain risks, including:

vulnerability to currency fluctuations in cases where essential equipment is imported and paid for with U.S. dollars, Euros or other foreign currencies, which could be exacerbated by the macroeconomic effects in Brazil of theCOVID-19 pandemic and the public health measures adopted in Brazil to combat the pandemic;

difficulties in managing inventory due to an inability to accurately forecast the domestic availability of certain essential equipment, which could be exacerbated by the effects of theCOVID-19 pandemic and the public health measures adopted in Brazil to combat the pandemic; and

the imposition of customs or other duties on essential equipment that is imported.

If any of these risks materialize, they may result in our inability to provide services to our customers in a timely manner or may affect the prices of our services, which may have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may be unable to respond to the trend towards consolidation in the Brazilian telecommunications market.

The Brazilian telecommunications market has been subject to consolidation. Mergers and acquisitions may change market dynamics, create competitive pressures and force small competitors to find partners, and may require us to adjust our operations, marketing strategies, and product portfolio. For example, in March 2015, Telefónica S.A., or Telefónica, acquired from Vivendi S.A., all of the shares of GVT Participações S.A., the controlling shareholder of Global Village Telecom S.A. This acquisition increased Telefónica’s share of the Brazilian telecommunications market, and we believe such trend is likely to continue in the industry as participants continue to pursue economies of scale. The entry of a new market participant with significant financial resources or potential changes in strategy by existing telecommunications service providers can change the competitive environment in the Brazilian market. We may be unable to keep pace with these changes, which could affect our ability to compete effectively and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Additional joint ventures, mergers and acquisitions among telecommunications service providers are possible in the future. If such consolidation occurs, it may result in increased competition within our market. We may be unable to adequately respond to pricing pressures resulting from consolidation in our market, adversely affecting our business, financial condition and results of operations. We may also consider engaging in merger or acquisition activity in response to changes in the competitive environment, which could divert resources away from other aspects of our business.

Our commitment to meet the obligations of our Brazilian employees’ pension plans, managed by Fundação Sistel de Seguridade Social and Fundação Atlântico de Seguridade Social may be higher than what is currently anticipated, and therefore, we may be required to make additional contributions of resources to these pension plans or to record liabilities or expenses that are higher than currently recorded.

As sponsors of certain private employee pension plans in Brazil, which are managed by Fundação Sistel de Seguridade Social, or Sistel, and Fundação Atlântico de Seguridade Social, or FATL, our subsidiaries cover the actuarial deficits of these pension benefit plans, which provide guaranteed benefits to our retirees in Brazil and guaranteed future benefits to our current Brazilian employees at the time of their retirement. As of December 31, 2019, our Brazilian pension benefit plans had an aggregate deficit of R$633 million. Our commitment to meet these deficit obligations may be higher than we currently anticipate, and we may be required to make additional contributions or record liabilities or expenses that are higher than we currently record, which may adversely affect our financial results. If the life expectancy of the beneficiaries should exceed the life expectancies included in the actuarial models, the level of our contributions to these plans could increase. If the managers of these plans should suffer losses on the investments of the assets of these plans, we would be required to make additional contributions to these plans in order for these plans to be able to provide the agreed benefits. Any increase in the level of our contributions to these plans as a result of an increase in life expectancy or a decline in investment returns could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. For a more detailed description of our Brazilian pension plans, see “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Employees—Employee Benefits—Pension Benefit Plans.”

As a result of the RJ Proceedings, andcertain of our unfunded obligations under our post-retirement plans were novated. As of December 31, 2019, we had recorded R$633 million on our balance sheet as “liability for pension benefits,” net of provision for unfunded status on our balance sheet, represented by the financialcommitment under the terms of the RJ Plan related to the financial obligations agreement, entered into by Oi and FATL intended for the payment of the mathematical provision without coverage by the plan’s assets. For more information, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—Our Recent History6. Directors, Senior Management and Development—Our Judicial Reorganization Proceedings.”

Share Splits

On November 18, 2014, Oi’s shareholders acting in an extraordinary general shareholders meeting authorized (1) the reverse split of all of Oi’s issued common shares into one common share for each 10 issued common shares,Employees—Employees—Employee Benefits—Pension Benefit Plans—Fundação Atlântico de Seguridade Social—TCSPREV Plan” and (2) the reverse split of all of Oi’s issued preferred shares into one preferred share for each 10 issued preferred shares. This reverse share split became effective on December 22, 2014. There was no change in the ratio of Common ADSs or Preferred ADSs in connection with this reverse share split; each Common ADS continuednote 27 to represent one Common Share and each Preferred ADS continues to represent one Preferred Share. All references to numbers of shares of Oi, dividend amounts of Oi and earnings per share of Oiour audited consolidated financial statements included in this annual reportreport.

Risks Relating to Brazil

The Brazilian government has exercised, and continues to exercise, significant influence over the Brazilian economy. This influence, as well as Brazilian political and economic conditions, could adversely impact our business, results of operations and financial condition and the market prices of our Common Shares, preferred shares and ADSs.

Oi is a Brazilian corporation, and substantially all of our operations and customers are located in Brazil. Accordingly, our financial condition and results of operations are substantially dependent on Brazil’s economy. The Brazilian federal government frequently exercises significant influence over the Brazilian economy and occasionally makes significant changes in policy and regulations. The Brazilian government’s actions to control inflation and implement macroeconomic policies have often involved, among other measures, changes in interest rates, changes in tax policies, wage and price controls, foreign exchange controls, currency devaluations, blocking access to bank accounts, imposing capital controls and limits on imports. We do not have any control over, and are unable to predict, which measures or policies the Brazilian government may adopt in the future. Our business, results of operations and financial condition and the market price of our Common Shares, Preferred Shares and ADSs may be adversely affected by changes in government policies or regulations, especially those related to the telecommunications sector, such as changes in rates and competitive conditions, as well as general economic factors, including:

the rate of growth of the Brazilian economy;

economic, political or social instability;

fluctuating exchange rates;

inflation;

interest rates and monetary policies;

reductions in salaries or income levels and unemployment rates;

liquidity of domestic capital and lending markets;

energy policy;

exchange controls and restrictions on remittances abroad;

changes to the regulatory framework governing our industry;

fiscal policies and changes in tax laws;

labor and social security policies, laws and regulations; and

other political, diplomatic, social and economic developments in or affecting Brazil.

Uncertainty over whether the Brazilian federal government will implement changes to the policies, regulations or standards affecting these or other factors in the future may affect economic performance and contribute to economic uncertainty in Brazil and to heightened volatility in the Brazilian securities markets and securities issued abroad by Brazilian issuers, which may have an adverse effect on us and the trading price of our Common Shares, Preferred Shares and ADSs.

Ongoing political instability has adversely affected the Brazilian economy, our business and results of operations and may adversely affect the market price of our Common Shares, Preferred Shares and ADSs.

The Brazilian economy has been affected by political events in Brazil, which have also affected the confidence of investors and the public in general, adversely impacting the performance of the Brazilian economy and heightening the volatility of securities issued by Brazilian companies.

Brazilian markets have also experienced heightened volatility due to uncertainties derived from the ongoing investigations conducted by the Brazilian Federal Police and the Federal Prosecutor’s Office (Ministério PúblicoFederal), among which is Operation Car Wash (OperaçãoLava Jato). Such investigations have impacted the Brazilian economy and political environment. Numerous members of the Brazilian government and of the legislative branch, as well as senior officers of large state-owned and private companies, have been adjustedconvicted of political corruption related to givebribes by means of kickbacks on contracts granted by the government to several infrastructure, oil and gas and construction companies, among others. Profits of these kickbacks allegedly financed the political campaigns of political parties that were unaccounted for or not publicly disclosed, and served to further the personal enrichment of the recipients of the bribery schemes. As a result, a number of senior politicians, including former president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, congressmen and officers of the major state-owned and private companies in Brazil, resigned and/or have been arrested, and numerous senior elected officials and other public officials are being investigated for unethical and illegal behavior.

The outcome of these investigations is uncertain, but they have already had an adverse impact on the image and reputation of the implicated companies, and on the general market perception of Brazil. The development of these investigations has and may continue to adversely affect us. We cannot predict whether the ongoing investigations will affect the market or will lead to heightened economic and political volatility in Brazil, nor whether new investigations against politicians and/or officers of private companies will occur in the future.

In addition, in October 2018, Brazilians elected federal congressmen, state congressmen,two-thirds of the total number of senators and governors, and the president, and the new elected officials took office at the beginning of 2019. Following a divisive presidential race, Congressman Jair Bolsonaro became Brazil’s president on January 1, 2019.

Any continuation of such divisions could result in congressional deadlock, political unrest and massive demonstrations and/or strikes that could materially adversely affect our operations. Uncertainties in relation to the implementation by the new administration of changes relating to monetary, tax and pension funds policies, as well as to the relevant legislation that must be passed to implement them, may contribute to economic instability. These uncertainties and new measures may increase market volatility of Brazilian securities issued abroad.

The President of Brazil has the power to determine policies and issue governmental acts related to the Brazilian economy that affect the operations and financial performance of companies, including us. We cannot predict which policies the newly elected president will adopt or if these policies or changes in current policies may have an adverse effect on us or the Brazilian economy.

Fluctuations in exchange rates may lead to substantial losses on our liabilities denominated in or linked to foreign currencies.

Since 1999, exchange rates for thereal have been set by the market, i.e., a floating exchange rate system. Although long-term depreciation of thereal is generally linked to the rate of inflation in Brazil, depreciation of thereal occurring over shorter periods of time has resulted in significant variations in the exchange rate between thereal, the U.S. dollar and other currencies. The exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the Brazilianreal has experienced significant fluctuations in recent years. Therealdepreciated against the U.S. dollar by 47.1% during 2015. During 2016, thereal appreciated against the U.S. dollar by 16.5% and thereal depreciated against the U.S. dollar by 1.5% in 2017, 17.1% in 2018, and 4.0% in 2019.

As of December 31, 2019, R$18,294 million, or 57.8%, of our total consolidated borrowings and financing was denominated in currencies other than thereal, excluding the fair value adjustment to our borrowings and financing and debt issuance costs, and R$9,521 million, or 52.2%, of our total consolidated borrowings and financing was denominated in currencies other than thereal, after giving effect to the fair value adjustment to our borrowings and financing and debt issuance costs. When thereal depreciates against foreign currencies, we incur losses on our liabilities denominated in foreign currencies, such as our U.S. dollar-denominated PIK Toggle Notes and export credit facilities, and we incur gains on our monetary assets denominated in or indexed to foreign currencies, as the liabilities and assets are translated intoreais. On the other hand, when therealdepreciates against foreign currencies, we incur gains on the balance of our fair value adjustment as a consequence of the gross debt balance, which partially offsets the negative impact on our borrowings and financings. If significant depreciation of thereal were to occur when the value of such liabilities significantly exceeds the value of such assets, including any financial instruments entered into for hedging purposes, we could incur significant losses, even if the value of those assets and liabilities has not changed in their original currency. In addition, a significant depreciation in thereal could adversely affect our ability to meet certain of our payment obligations. A failure to meet certain of our payment obligations could trigger a default under certain financial covenants in our debt instruments, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

The significant depreciation of thereal subsequent to December 31, 2019, partially due to the10-for-oneCOVID-19 reverse share split.

On February 1, 2016,pandemic and the public health measures adopted to combat the pandemic in Brazil and internationally, is expected to have effects on our U.S. dollar-denominated indebtedness and interest expenses, negatively affecting our results of operations. Notwithstanding the adverse effects on the carrying amounts of our financial liabilities, we changeddo not anticipate any substantial effect on our liquidity as there are few short-term payment obligations under our indebtedness, which we have hedged by continuing to hold a portion of the ratio applicableproceeds from our sale of PT Ventures in U.S. dollars. However, a prolonged deterioration of the value of thereal could adversely affect our ability to Common ADSs from one Common Share per Common ADSmeet our payment obligations on our indebtedness when future amortization payments become due. A portion of our capital expenditures and operating leases require us to five Common Shares per Common ADS. All referencesacquire assets or use third-party assets at prices denominated in or linked to numbersforeign currencies, some of Common ADSswhich are financed by liabilities denominated in this annual report have been adjustedforeign currencies, principally the U.S. dollar. We generally do not hedge exposures relating to give effectour capital expenditures against risks related to this change in ratio.

movements of thereal against foreign currencies. To the extent that the value of thereal decreases relative to the U.S. dollar, it becomes more costly for us to purchase these assets or services, which could adversely affect our business and financial performance. Despite the 17.1% depreciation of thereal during 2018, the slow recovery of the Brazilian economy limited inflation and allowed the Central Bank of Brazil (

Market Share and Other Information

We make statements in this annual report about our market share and other information relating to the telecommunications industry in Brazil. We have made these statements on the basis of information obtained from third-party sources and publicly available information that we believe are reliable, such as information and reports from ANATEL, among others. Notwithstanding any investigation that we may have conducted with respect to the market share, market size or similar data provided by third parties or derived from industry or general publications, we assume no responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of any such information.

Rounding

We have made rounding adjustments to reach some of the figures included in this annual report. As a result, numerical figures shown as totals in some tables may not be arithmetic aggregations of the figures that precede them.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT WITH RESPECT TO FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This annual report contains forward-looking statements. Some of the matters discussed concerning our business operations and financial performance include forward-looking statements within the meaning of the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, or the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act.

Statements that are predictive in nature, that depend upon or refer to future events or conditions or that include words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “estimates” and similar expressions are forward-looking statements. Although we believe that these forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions, these statements are subject to several risks and uncertainties and are made in light of information currently available to us.

Many important factors could cause our actual results to differ substantially from those anticipated in our forward-looking statements, including, among other things:

 

material adverse changes in economic conditions in Brazil or the other countries in which we have operations and investments;

 

the Brazilian government’s telecommunications policies that affect the telecommunications industry and our business in Brazil in general, including issues relating to the remuneration for the use of our network in Brazil, and changes in or developments of ANATEL regulations applicable to us;

 

the cost and availability of financing;

 

any judicial action that overturns or modifies the Brazilian Confirmation Order or declares the RJ Debtors bankrupt under Brazilian law and requires their liquidation;

 

the effects of intense competition in Brazil and the other countries in which we have operations and investments;

 

the general level of demand for, and changes in the market prices of, our services;

 

our ability to implement our corporate strategies in order to expand our customer base and increase our average revenue per user;

 

  

political, regulatory and economic conditions in Brazil, notably with respect to inflation, exchange rate fluctuation of thereal,interest rates fluctuation and the political environment in Brazil;

 

the adverse effects ofCOVID-19, and public health measures adopted to combat the pandemic in Brazil and internationally, on our employees, our business operations (including our retail operations, our network operations, our network maintenance programs and our expansion programs), our third-party vendors and the ability of our customers to pay for services on a timely basis;

the outcomes of legal and administrative proceedings to which we are or become a party;

 

changes in telecommunications technology that could require substantial or unexpected investments in infrastructure or that could lead to changes in our customers’ behavior;

the disposal of our international investments; and

 

other factors identified or discussed under “Item 3. Key Information––Risk Factors.”

Our forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, and our actual results or other developments may differ materially from the expectations expressed in the forward-looking statements. As for forward-looking statements that relate to future financial results and other projections, actual results will be different due to the inherent uncertainty of estimates, forecasts and projections. Because of these uncertainties, potential investors should not rely on these forward-looking statements.

We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

PART I

 

ITEM 1.

IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS

Not applicable.

 

ITEM 2.

OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE

Not applicable.

 

ITEM 3.

KEY INFORMATION

Selected Financial Information

The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements (including the notes thereto), “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” and “Presentation of Financial and Other Information.”

The following selected financial data have been derived from our consolidated financial statements. The selected financial data as of December 31, 20182019 and 20172018 and for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 20162017 have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. The selected financial data as of December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 and for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 20142017 have been derived from our consolidated financial statements that are not included in this annual report. We have not included selected financial data as of or for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 as such information cannot be provided on a restated basis without unreasonable effort or expense.

The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto, “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” and “Presentation of Financial and Other Information.”

Oi has not paid any dividends and/or interest attributable to shareholders’ equity since January 1, 2014.

 

   For the Year Ended December 31, 
   2018(1)  2018  2017  2016  2015  2014 
               (restated)  (restated) 
   (in millions
of US$, except
per share
amounts)
  (in millions ofreais, except per share amounts and as otherwise indicated) 

Income Statement Data:

       

Net operating revenue

  US$5,693  R$22,060  R$23,790  R$25,996  R$27,354  R$28,247 

Cost of sales and services

   (4,083  (15,823  (15,676  (16,742  (16,250  (16,257
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross profit

   1,610   6,237   8,114   9,254   11,104   11,990 

Selling expenses

   (1,156  (4,478  (4,400  (4,383  (4,720  (5,566

General and administrative expenses

   (696  (2,698  (3,064  (3,688  (3,912  (3,835

Other operating income (expenses), net

   108   417   (1,044  (1,237  (2,295  1,758 

Reorganization items, net

   8,150   31,581   (2,372  (9,006      
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating income (loss) before financial expenses, net, and taxes

   8,016   31,059   (2,766  (9,060  178   4,347 

Financial expenses, net

   (1,035  (4,012  (1,612  (4,375  (6,724  (4,688
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income (loss) of continuing operations before taxes

   6,980   27,047   (4,378  (13,435  (6,546  (342

Income tax and social contribution

   90   347   351   (2,245  (3,380  (758
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss) of continuing operations

   7,070   27,394   (4,027  (15,680  (9,926  (1,100

Net income (loss) of discontinued operations, net of taxes

               (867  (4,086
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

  US$7,070  R$27,394  R$(4,027 R$(15,680 R$(10,793 R$(5,186
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss) attributable to controlling shareholders

  US$7,063  R$27,369  R$(3,736 R$(15,502 R$(10,380 R$(5,187

  For the Year Ended December 31,   For the Year Ended December 31, 
  2018(1)   2018   2017 2016 2015 2014   2019 2018 2017 
              (restated) (restated)   (in millions ofreais, except per share amounts
and as otherwise indicated)
 

Income Statement Data:

    

Net operating revenue

  R$20,136  R$22,060  R$23,790 

Cost of sales and services

   (15,315 (16,179 (15,669
  (in millions
of US$, except
per share
amounts)
   (in millions ofreais, except per share amounts and as
otherwise indicated)
   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Gross profit

   4,821  5,881  8,121 

Selling expenses

   (3,548 (3,853 (4,103

General and administrative expenses

   (2,782 (2,739 (3,137

Other operating income (expenses), net

   (1,469 (4,557 (3,243
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Operating income (loss) before financial expenses, net, and taxes

   (2,977 (5,268 (2,361

Financial expenses, net

   (6,110 26,609  (3,197
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Income (loss) before taxes

   (9,087 21,341  (5,558

Income tax and social contribution

   (8 3,275  (1,099
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net income (loss)

  R$(9,095 R$24,616  R$(6,656
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net income (loss) attributable to controlling shareholders

  R$(9,000 R$24,591  R$(6,365

Net income (loss) attributable tonon-controlling shareholders

   6    24    (291 (178 (413 1    (95 24  (291

Net income (loss) applicable to each class of shares(2):

         

Net income (loss) applicable to each class of shares(1):

    

Common shares basic and diluted

   6,330    24,526    (2,874 (11,925 (4,473 (1,702   (8,765 22,036  (4,896

Preferred shares and ADSs basic and diluted

   734    2,844    (862 (3,577 (5,907 (3,485   (236 2,555  (1,469

Net income (loss) per share:

             

Common shares – basic and diluted

   4.71    18.24    (5.53 (22.94 (14.22 (8.41   (1.51 16.39  (9.42

Common ADSs – basic and diluted

   23.54    91.19    (27.65 (114.72 (71.11 (42.06   (7.57 81.94  (47.10

Preferred shares and ADSs – basic and diluted

   4.71    18.24    (5.53 (22.94 (14.22 (8.41   (1.51 16.39  (9.42

Net income (loss) per sharefrom continuing operations:

         

Weighted average shares outstanding (in thousands):

    

Common shares – basic and diluted

   4.71    18.24    (5.53 (22.94 (14.22 (8.41   5,788,447  1,344,686  519,752 

Common ADSs – basic and diluted

   23.54    91.19    (27.65 (114.72 (71.11 (42.06

Preferred shares and ADSs – basic and diluted

   4.71    18.24    (5.53 (22.94 (14.22 (8.41

Net income (loss) per sharefrom discontinued operations:

         

Common shares – basic and diluted

                (1.19 6.63 

Common ADSs – basic and diluted

                (5.94 33.14 

Preferred shares and ADSs – basic and diluted

                (1.19 6.63 

Weighted average shares outstanding (in thousands):

         

Common shares – basic

     1,344,686    519,752  519,752  314,518  202,312 

Common shares – diluted

     1,344,686    519,752  519,752  314,518  202,312 

Preferred shares and ADSs – basic

     155,915    155,915  155,915  415,321  414,200 

Preferred shares and ADSs – diluted

     155,915    155,915  155,915  415,321  414,200 

Preferred shares – basic and diluted

   155,615  155,915  155,915 

 

(1)

Translated for convenience only using the selling rate as reported by the Brazilian Central Bank on December 31, 2018 forreais into U.S. dollars of R$3.8748=US$1.00.

(2)

In accordance with ASC 260, basicBasic and diluted earnings per share have been calculated using the “two class method.” See note 22 to our audited consolidated financial statements included in this annual report.

 

  As of December 31, 
  2018(1)   2018   2017 2016 2015(2)   2014(2)   As of December 31, 
              (restated)   (restated)   2019   2018   2017 
  (in millions
of US$)
   (in millions ofreais)   (in millions ofreais) 

Balance Sheet Data:

                

Cash and cash equivalents

  US$1,132   R$4,385   R$6,863  R$7,563  R$14,898   R$2,449   R$2,082   R$4,385   R$6,863 

Short-term investments

   52    202    21  117  1,802    171    184    202    21 

Trade accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts

   1,682    6,517    7,367  7,891  8,010    7,092    6,335    6,517    7,367 

Assets held for sale

   1,271    4,923    4,675  5,404  7,686    34,255    4,391    4,923    4,675 

Total current assets

   5,501    21,313    23,498  26,212  37,645    50,797    17,993    21,313    23,748 

Property, plant and equipment, net

   7,347    28,469    27,083  26,080  25,818    26,244    38,911    28,426    26,989 

Non-current judicial deposits

   1,811    7,019    8,290  8,388  8,953    9,127    6,651    7,019    8,290 

Intangible assets, net

   2,071    8,025    9,255  10,511  11,780    13,554    3,998    6,948    8,351 

Total assets

   17,355    67,248    70,987  74,047  94,545    106,999    71,892    65,438    68,639 

Short-term loans and financings (including current portion of long-term debt)

   174    673    54  55  11,810    4,464 

Short-term borrowings and financing (including current portion of long-term debt)

   326    673    54,515 

Short-term leases payables

   1,510         

Short-term trade payables

   1,347    5,226    5,171  4,116  5,253    4,359    4,794    5,024    4,924 

Liabilities of assets held for sale(2)

   136    527    354  545  745    27,178    494    527    354 

Total current liabilities

   2,643    10,240    9,831  9,444  26,142    42,752    11,836    10,689    67,892 

Long-term loans and financings

   4,072    15,777         48,048    31,386 

Liabilities subject to compromise

           65,139  63,746        

Long-term borrowings and financing

   17,900    15,777     

Long-term leases payables

   6,640         

Total liabilities

   9,819    38,048    80,671  79,396  83,528    84,253    54,095    42,542    82,152 

Share capital

   8,268    32,038    21,438  21,438  21,438    21,438    32,539    32,038    21,438 

Shareholders’ equity

   7,536    29,199    (9,684 (5,349 11,017    22,746    17,797    22,896    (13,513

 

(1)

Translated for convenience only using the selling rate as reported by the Brazilian Central Bank on December 31, 2018 forreais into U.S. dollars of R$3.8748=US$1.00.

(2)

As of December 31, 2014, includes short-term loans and financings (including current portion of long-term debt) of R$1,935 million and long-term loans and financings of R$16,958 million that remained obligations of our company following the completion of our sale of PT Portugal.

Exchange Rates

The Brazilian foreign exchange system allows the purchase and sale of foreign currency and the international transfer ofreais by any person or legal entity, regardless of the amount, subject to certain regulatory procedures.

Since 1999, the Brazilian Central Bank has allowed the U.S. dollar-real exchange rate to float freely, and, since then, the U.S. dollar-real exchange rate has fluctuated considerably.

In the past, the Brazilian Central Bank has intervened occasionally to control unstable movements in foreign exchange rates. We cannot predict whether the Brazilian Central Bank or the Brazilian government will continue to permit thereal to float freely or will intervene in the exchange rate market through the return of a currency band system or otherwise. Thereal may depreciate or appreciate against the U.S. dollar and/or the euro substantially. Furthermore, Brazilian law provides that, whenever there is a significant imbalance in Brazil’s balance of payments or there are serious reasons to foresee a significant imbalance, temporary restrictions may be imposed on remittances of foreign capital abroad. We cannot assure you that such measures will not be taken by the Brazilian government in the future. See “ —Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Brazil—Fluctuations in exchange rates may lead to substantial losses on our liabilities denominated in or linked to foreign currencies.”

The following table shows the commercial selling rate or selling rate, as applicable, for U.S. dollars for the periods and dates indicated.The information in the “Average” column represents the average of the exchange rates on the last day of each month during the periods presented.

   Reais per U.S. Dollar 

Year

  High   Low   Average   Period End 

2014

  R$2.740   R$2.197   R$2.354   R$2.656 

2015

   4.195    2.575    3.339    3.905 

2016

   4.156    3.119    3.483    3.259 

2017

   3.381    3.051    3.193    3.308 

2018

   4.188    3.139    3.656    3.875 

   Reais per U.S. Dollar 

Month

  High   Low 

October 2018

  R$4.027   R$3.637 

November 2018

   3.893    3.697 

December 2018

   3.933    3.829 

January 2019

   3.860    3.652 

February 2019

   3.776    3.669 

March 2019

   3.968    3.776 

April 2019(1)

   3.944    3.835 

(1)

Through April 23, 2019.

Source: Brazilian Central Bank

Risk Factors

You should consider the following risks as well as the other information set forth in this annual report when evaluating an investment in our company. In general, investing in the securities of issuers in emerging market countries, such as Brazil, involves a higher degree of risk than investing in the securities of issuers in the United States. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us, or those that we currently deem to be immaterial, may also materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. Any of the following risks could materially affect us. In such case, the market price of the Common Shares, Preferred Shares and ADSs could be adversely affected.

Risks Relating to the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry and Regulatory Environment

The Brazilian telecommunications industry is highly regulated. Changes to these regulations have and may continue to adversely impact our business.

The Brazilian telecommunications industry is highly regulated by ANATEL. ANATEL regulates, among other things, rates, quality of service and universal service goals, as well as competition among telecommunications service providers. Changes in laws and regulations, grants of new concessions, authorizations or licenses or the imposition of additional universal service obligations, among other factors, may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. For more information, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry.”

We cannot predict whether ANATEL or the Brazilian government will adopt these or other telecommunications sector policies in the future, or the consequences of such policies on our business or the business of our competitors. In the event that any modification of the regulatory scheme or new regulations applicable to our company are adopted that increase the costs of compliance to our company, whether through capital expenditure requirements, increased service requirements, increased costs for renewal of our authorizations and licenses, increased exposure to regulatory penalties or otherwise, these modifications and regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our concession agreements and authorizations contain certain obligations, and our failure to comply with these obligations may result in various fines and penalties being imposed on us by ANATEL.

Our local fixed-line and domestic long-distance concession agreements in Brazil contain terms reflecting the General Plan of Universal Service Goals (Plano Geral de Metas de Universalização), or the PGMU, the General Plan of Quality GoalsManagement Regulations (Plano GeralRegulamento de Metas deGestão da Qualidade), or the PGMQ,RGQ, which was adopted by ANATEL in June 2013, and was partially superseded by the Quality of Telecommunications Services Regulation (Regulamento de Qualidade dos Serviços de Telecomunicações), or the RQUAL, in December 2019, and other regulations adopted by ANATEL, the terms of which could affect our financial condition and results of operations. Our local fixed-line concession agreements in Brazil also require us to meet certain network expansion, quality of service and modernization obligations in each of the Brazilian states in our service areas. In the event of noncompliance with ANATEL targets in any one of these states, ANATEL can establish a deadline for achieving the targeted level of such service, impose penalties and, in extreme situations, terminate the applicable concession agreement for noncompliance with our quality and universal service obligations. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry—Our Services—Fixed-Line Telephone Services.”

In addition, our authorizations to provide personal mobile services contain certain obligations requiring us to meet network scope and quality of service targets. If we fail to meet these obligations, we may be fined by ANATEL until we are in full compliance with our obligations and, in extreme circumstances, our authorizations could be revoked by ANATEL. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry—Our Services—Mobile Telephone Services.”

On an almost weekly basis, we receive inquiries from ANATEL requiring information from us on our compliance with the various service obligations imposed on us by our concession agreements. If we are unable to respond satisfactorily to those inquiries or comply with our service obligations under our concession agreements, ANATEL may commence administrative proceedings in connection with such noncompliance. We have received numerous notices of commencement of administrative proceedings from ANATEL, mostly due to our inability to achieve certain targets established in the PGMU and the PGMQ.RGQ. For more information, see “Item 8. Financial Information—Legal Proceedings—Civil Claims Relating to Oi S.A. and Our Brazilian Operations—Administrative Proceedings.”

 

Our concession agreements in Brazil are subject to periodic modifications by ANATEL, and we cannot assure you that the modifications to these concession agreements will not have adverse effects on our company.

We provide fixed-line telecommunications services in our Brazilian service areas pursuant to concession agreements with the Brazilian government. These concession agreements expire on December 31, 2025 and may be amended by the parties every five years prior to the expiration date. In connection with each five-year amendment, ANATEL has the right, following public consultations, to impose new terms and conditions in response to changes in technology, competition in the marketplace and domestic and international economic conditions.

Our concession agreements were last amended in 2011. In 2014, ANATEL held a public comment period for the 2015 revision of the terms of our concession agreements and met regularly with us throughout 2015 to discuss possible amendments, and in 2016 the Brazilian Ministry of Communication issued an ordinance addressing guidelines for the establishment of a new regulatory framework for telecommunications, in line with the provisions of legislation that was introduced in the Brazilian Congress, which we refer to as PLC 79, to substantially amend certain features of the current regulatory framework of the Brazilian telecommunications industry. For more information about PLC 79, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry—Our Services—Fixed-Line Telephone Services—Our Concessions and Authorizations.” Despite these efforts, our concession agreements have not yet been amended, as a result of the Brazilian Congress’s failure to date to pass PLC 79, passage of which is required to provide the necessary legal authority for ANATEL to implement the proposed changes to our concession agreements. Further discussions regarding amendments to our concession agreements have halted pending resolution of PLC 79. Under their existing terms, our concession agreements may be amended by December 2020 at the latest. If PLC 79 is not passed, our concession agreements will expire in 2025 without the possibility of renewal. For more information about our concession agreements, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry—Our Services—Fixed-Line Telephone Services—Our Concessions and Authorizations.”

In connection with the consideration of revisions to the concession agreements under the public regime, in January 2017, ANATEL proposed revisions to the terms of the General Plan of Grants (Plano Geral de Outorgas), or the PGO, in line with the provisions of PLC 79. However, as a result of the legislative gridlock faced by PLC 79, ANATEL has halted implementation of the PGO. For more information about PLC 79 and ANATEL’s proposed revisions to the terms of the PGO, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry—Our Services—Fixed-Line Telephone Services—Our Concessions and Authorizations.”

We cannot assure you that any future amendments to our concession agreements will not impose requirements on our company that will require us to undertake significant capital expenditures or will not modify the rate-setting procedures applicable to us in a manner that will significantly reduce the net operating revenue that we generate from our Brazilian fixed-line businesses. If the amendments to our Brazilian concession agreements have these effects, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

We cannot assure you that our bids for new concessions upon the expiration of our existing concessionswe will be successfulable to convert our concessions into authorizations or renew our concessions in a timely or cost-effective manner.

On October 3, 2019, the President of Brazil signed Law No. 13,879, which amended the Brazilian General Telecommunications Law (Lei Geral das Telecomunicações), or the General Telecommunications Law, to allow, among other things, providers of fixed-line telecommunications services operating under a concession in the public regime to convert their concessions into authorizations to operate in the private regime and thereby eliminate a number of obligations currently imposed by the concession regime. In exchange, providers may be required to assume obligations to make additional investments in their networks, primarily related to the expansion of broadband services. The cost of the additional investments in exchange for the elimination of such obligations, would be subject to discussion between the parties, with ANATEL having the ability to make the final valuation. In addition, the new law permits providers to renew their concession for indefinite additional20-year periods, whereas previously only one20-year renewal period was allowed, provided that at least 30 months prior to each expiration date, the pending expirationproviders have complied with the obligations required of them under the applicable concession. Prior to the passage of Law No. 13,879, our concession agreements would have expired in 2025 without the possibility of renewal. In February 2020, ANATEL proposed regulations to implement Law No. 13,879, including the rules that will govern the conversion of concessions into authorizations. These proposed regulations are subject to a public consultation period that is expected to expire on April 30, 2020. We cannot predict when and to what extent these regulations will be adopted. Once these regulations are adopted, we expect that we will be able to migrate our public regime concessions into private-regime authorizations or renew our concessions, which would otherwise expire on December 31, 2025. However, as of the date of this annual report, we have not decided which option to pursue and cannot predict the cost of pursuing any of these concessions will not have adverse effectsoptions. For more information about Law No. 13,879, see “Item 4. Information on our ability to finance our operations.

We expectthe Company—Regulation of the Brazilian governmentTelecommunications Industry—Public Regime—Amendments to offer newthe General Telecommunications Law” and “Item 4. Information on the Company—Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry—Our Services—Fixed-Line Telephone Services.”

If we are not able to convert our concessions in competitive auctionsinto authorizations or renew our concessions prior to the expiration of our existing concession agreements on December 31, 2025. Weconcessions, we may be able to participate in suchcompetitive auctions butfor new concessions that the Brazilian government may choose to conduct. However, our existing fixed-line and domestic long-distance concession agreements will not entitle us to preferential treatment in these auctions. Ifauctions, and we domay not be able to secure new concessions for our existing service areas in any future auctions or if such concessions aremay be on less favorable terms than our current concessions,concessions. In such cases, our business, financial condition and results of operations would be materially adversely affected. In addition, based on the current scheduled expiration of our concession agreements and the uncertainty that the terms of these concessions will be extended, investors may be unwilling to make investments in our company on terms that are attractive to our company, or at all. Our inability to raise capital in the equity or debt markets on favorable terms, or at all, could have a materially adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The mobile telecommunications industry and participants in this industry, including us, may be required to adopt an extensive program of field measurements of radio frequency emissions and be subject to further regulation and/or claims based on concerns regarding potential health problems and interfere with medical devices.

Media and other entities have suggested that the electromagnetic emissions from mobile handsets and base stations may cause health problems. If consumers harbor health-related concerns, they may be discouraged from using mobile handsets. These concerns could have an adverse effect on the mobile telecommunications industry and, possibly, expose mobile services providers to litigation. We cannot assure you that further medical research and studies will refute a link between the electromagnetic emissions of mobile handsets and base stations, including on frequency ranges we use to provide mobile services, and these health concerns. Government authorities could increase regulation on electromagnetic emissions of mobile handsets and base stations, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. The expansion of our network may be affected by these perceived risks if we experience problems in finding new sites, which, in turn, may delay the expansion and may affect the quality of our services.

In July 2002, ANATEL enacted regulations that limit emission and exposure for fields with frequencies between 9 kHz and 300 GHz. In May 2009, Law No. 11,934 was enacted, which established the need for field measurements by telecommunications service providers of all radio-communication transmitting stations every five years with respect to emission and exposure to these fields. In September 2018, ANATEL published Resolution No. 700/2018, a regulation pursuant to Law No. 11,934 that will makemakes field measurements mandatory by telecommunication service providers of all radio-communication transmission stations every five years beginning in 2019. In January 2019, ANATEL passed Act No. 458/2019 regarding the technical requirements of Resolution No. 700/2018. However, Act No. 458/2019 is not yet in full force because the measurement parameters have not yet been defined, and ANATEL has had difficulties implementing internal systems to monitor compliance. We are still evaluating the scope of the technical and financial impact of these new regulations on our company.company, as ANATEL has not yet defined all of the relevant technical requirements related to these regulations as of the date of this annual report.

Companies in the Brazilian telecommunication industry, including us, may be harmed by restrictions regarding the installation of new antennas for mobile services.

Currently,As of the date of this annual report, there are approximately 250 municipal laws in Brazil that limit the installation of new antennas for mobile service, which has been a barrier to the expansion of mobile networks. Those laws are meant to regulate issues related to zoning and the alleged effects of the radiation and radiofrequencies of the antennas. The federal law, that establishes new guidelines to create a consolidated plan for the installation of antennas was approved in 2015, however, it is still pending specific regulation. Despite the federal initiative, as long as the municipal laws remain unchanged, the risk of noncompliance with regulations and of having services of limited quality in certain areas continues to exist, which could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Additional antenna installation is also limited as a result of concerns that radio frequency emissions from base stations may cause health problems. See “—The mobile telecommunications industry and participants in this industry, including us, may be required to adopt an extensive program of field measurements of radio frequency emissions and be subject to further regulation and/or claims based on concerns regarding potential health problems and interfere with medical devices.”

The telecommunications industry is subject to frequent changes in technology. Our ability to remain competitive depends on our ability to implement new technology, and it is difficult to predict how new technology will affect our business.

Companies in the telecommunications industry must adapt to rapid and significant technological changes that are usually difficult to anticipate. The mobile telecommunications industry in particular has experienced rapid and significant technological development and frequent improvements in capacity, quality and data-transmission speed. We expect that new products and technologies will emerge and that existing products and technologies will be further developed. For example, in 2020, ANATEL willis expected to conduct auctions for radiofrequencies in the 5G spectrum.spectrum during 2020. The advent of new products and technologies could have a variety of consequences. Our future success depends on our ability to anticipate and adapt in a timely manner to technological changes. Technological changes may render our equipment, services and technology obsolete or inefficient, which may adversely affect our competitiveness or require us to increase our capital expenditures in order to maintain our competitive position. These new products and technologies may reduce the price of our services by providing lower-cost alternatives and the creation of new digital services.

For example, personal mobility service providers in Brazil are experiencing increasing competition fromover-the-top, or OTT, providers, which provide content (such as WhatsApp, Skype and YouTube) over an internet connection rather than through a service provider’s network. OTT providers are becoming increasingly competitive as customers shift from mobile voice and SMS communications to internet-based voice and data communications through computers and smartphone or tablet applications. In addition, as providers of fixed and mobile telecommunications services, we face more legal, regulatory and tax barriers than providers of OTT services, increasing our costs in relation to these provides and preventing us from being able to fully compete with them.

We may not obtain the expected benefits of our investments if more advanced technologies are adopted by the market. Even if we adopt new technologies in a timely manner as they are developed, the cost of such technology may exceed the benefit to us, and we cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain our level of competitiveness.

Our operations depend on our ability to maintain, upgrade and operate efficiently our accounting, billing, customer service, information technology and management information systems and to rely on the systems of other carriers underco-billing agreements.

Our success largely depends on the continued and uninterrupted performance of our controls, network technology systems and of certain hardware. Our technical infrastructure (including our network infrastructure for mobile telecommunications services) is vulnerable to damage or interruption from information and telecommunication technology failures, power loss, floods, windstorms, fires, terrorism, intentional wrongdoing, human error and similar events. Our controls are dependent, not exclusively, on these technological systems and are also subject to the interruptions and failures. Unanticipated problems with our controls, or at our facilities, system failures, hardware or software failures, computer viruses or hacker attacks could affect the quality of our services and cause service interruptions. Any of these occurrences could result in reduced user traffic and reduced revenue and could harm our levels of customer satisfaction, our reputation and compliance with certain of our regulatory obligations.

Sophisticated information and processing systems are vital to our growth and our ability to monitor costs, render monthly invoices for services, process customer orders, provide customer service and achieve operating efficiencies. We cannot assure you that we will be able to operate successfully and upgrade our accounting, information and processing systems or that these systems will continue to perform as expected. We have entered intoco-billing agreements with each long-distance telecommunications service provider that is interconnected to our networks in Brazil to include in our invoices the long-distance services rendered by these providers, and these providers have agreed to include charges owed to us in their invoices. Any failure in our accounting, information and processing systems, or any problems with the execution of invoicing and collection services by other carriers with whom we haveco-billing agreements, could impair our ability to collect payments from customers and respond satisfactorily to customer needs, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We face various cyber-security risks that, if not adequately addressed, could have an adverse effect on our business.

We face various cyber-security risks that could result in business losses, including but not limited to contamination (whether intentional or accidental) of our networks and systems by third parties with whom we exchange data, equipment failures or unauthorized access to and loss of confidential customer, employee and/or proprietary data by persons inside or outside of our organization. We are also exposed to cyber attacks causing systems degradation or service unavailability, the penetration of our information technology systems and platforms byill-intentioned third parties, and infiltration of malware (such as computer viruses) into our systems.

The risks of cyber attacks has been exacerbated as a result of measures that we have adopted to combat theCOVID-19 pandemic, principally the institution of a “work-from-home” policy for our employees. Because our managers and employees have access to our information systems from their remote locations, the demands on our security systems have increased. Although we have implemented measures to prevent unauthorized access to our systems through the compromise of these remote access points, we cannot assure you that perpetrators of cyber attacks will be prevented from accessing our information systems in all cases.

Cyber attacks against companies have increased in frequency, scope and potential harm in recent years. Further, the perpetrators of cyber attacks are not restricted to particular groups or persons. These attacks may be committed by company employees or third parties operating in any region, including jurisdictions where law enforcement measures to address such attacks are unavailable or ineffective. We may not be able to successfully protect our operational and information technology systems and platforms against such threats. Further, as cyber attacks continue to evolve, we may incur significant costs in the attempt to modify or enhance our protective measures or investigate or remediate any vulnerability.

The inability to operate our networks and systems as a result of cyber attacks, even for a limited period of time, may result in significant expenses to us and/or a loss of market share to other telecommunications providers. The costs associated with a major cyber attack could include expensive incentives offered to existing customers and business partners to retain their business, increased expenditures on cyber-security measures and the use of alternate resources, lost revenues from business interruption and litigation. If we are unable to adequately address these cyber-security risks, orour operating network and information systems could be compromised, which wouldcould have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Risks Relating to Our Company

Our debt instruments contain covenants that could restrict our financing and operating flexibility and have other adverse consequences.

As of December 31, 2018,2019, we had total outstanding loansborrowings and financingsfinancing of R$30,37931,642 million, excluding the fair value adjustment to our loansborrowings and financings,financing and debt issuance costs, and R$16,45018,227 million, after giving effect to the fair value adjustment.adjustment and debt issuance costs. In addition, in February 2020, an investor subscribed to an aggregate amount of R$2,500 million of Oi Mobile’snon-convertible debentures. We are subject to certain financial covenants under the instruments that govern our indebtedness that limit our ability to incur additional debt. The level of our consolidated indebtedness and the requirements and limitations imposed by these debt instruments could adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations. In particular, the terms of some of these debt instruments restrict or may restrict our ability, and the ability of our subsidiaries, to:

 

incur or guarantee additional debt;

 

grant liens;

liens over or pledge assets;

 

sell or dispose of assets;

merge or consolidate with another company;

pay dividends or distributions on capital stock or repurchase capital stock; and

 

make certain acquisitions, mergers and consolidations.

As of December 31, 2018, we were in full compliance withThese covenants could limit our financial covenants underability to plan for or react to market conditions or to meet our financial instruments.

If we are unable to incur additional debt, we may be unable to invest in our business and make necessaryoperational or advisable capital expenditures,needs, which could reduce future net operating revenue and adversely affect our cash flows and profitability. Our ability to comply with these covenants may be affected by events beyond our control, and we may have to curtail some operations to maintain compliance. As of December 31, 2019, we were in full compliance with our financial covenants under our financial instruments.

In addition, the failure of Oi and our restricted subsidiaries to comply with these covenants could result in a default under our debt agreements, which could permit the holders to accelerate our obligation to repay the debt and may be cross-defaulted to other debt. Our assets or cash flow may not be sufficient to fully repay borrowings under our outstanding debt agreements if accelerated upon an event of default, and there is no guarantee that we would be able to repay, refinance or restructure the payments on those debt agreements.

Furthermore, our debt instruments with BNDES contain financial covenants that require Oi to maintain five specified financial ratios, measured on a quarterly basis. Under these debt instruments, BNDES has the right to accelerate the debt if, at the date the financial covenants are tested, we are not in compliance with any two of these ratios. At December 31, 2019, we were in compliance with these financial covenants. As a result of the depreciation of thereal subsequent to December 31, 2019, partially due to theCOVID-19 pandemic and the public health measures adopted to combat the pandemic in Brazil and internationally, and the related effects on our U.S. dollar-denominated indebtedness and interest expenses, we believed that it was probable that as of March 31, 2020, we would not be in compliance with more than one of these financial ratios. In anticipation of these ratio breaches, on March 30, 2020 we obtained a waiver from BNDES. The cross-default or cross-acceleration clauses in the instruments governing our other indebtedness (other than Oi Mobile’snon-convertible debentures) provide that an event of default under our debt instruments with BNDES do not trigger an event of default under our other indebtedness or enable the creditors under other indebtedness to accelerate that indebtedness.

Under the RJ Plan, until February 5, 2023, we are required to apply an amount equivalent to 100% of the net revenue from our sale of assets in excess of US$200 million to investments in our activities. Beginning on February 5, 2024, we are required to allocate to the repayment of debt instruments representing recoveries under the RJ Plan on an annual basis an amount equivalent to 70% of the amount by which (1) our cash and cash equivalents and financial investments at the end of each fiscal year exceeds (2) the greater of (a) 25% of our operating expenses and capital expenses for that fiscal year, and (b) R$5,000 million, subject to adjustment in the event that we conclude any capital increases. The cash required to make these repayments will reduce the amount available to us to make capital expenditures.

The RJ Plan permits us to seek to raise up to R$2.5 billion in the capital markets and seek to borrow up to R$2 billion under new export credit facilities, as described under “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Liquidity and Capital Resources.” This debt may be denominated inreais or in foreign currencies. Accordingly, we may incur interest expenses and foreign exchange gains and losses in connection with this new debt. A significant increase in any of these interest rates could adversely affect our financial expenses and negatively affect our overall financial performance.

If the Brazilian Confirmation Order is overturned or modified, the RJ Debtors may be declared bankrupt under Brazilian law and liquidated.

On June 20, 2016, Oi, together with the other RJ Debtors, filed a joint voluntary petition for judicial reorganization pursuant to the Brazilian Bankruptcy Law with the RJ Court, pursuant to an urgent measure approved by our board of directors. On December 19 and 20, 2017, thea GCM was held to consider approval of the most recently filed judicial reorganization plan. TheThis GCM concluded on December 20, 2017 following the approval of the RJ Plan reflecting amendments to the judicial reorganization plan presented at thethis GCM as negotiated during the course of thethis GCM. On January 8, 2018, the RJ Court entered the Brazilian Confirmation Order, ratifying and confirming the RJ Plan. The Brazilian Confirmation Order was published in the Official Gazette of the State of Rio de Janeiro on February 5, 2018, the Brazilian Confirmation Date. For more information with respect to the RJ Proceedings, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—Our Recent History and Development—Our Judicial Reorganization Proceedings.”

The Brazilian Confirmation Order, according to its terms, is currently binding on all parties, although it is subject to six pending appeals with no suspensive effect attributed to it.those appeals. By operation of the RJ Plan and the Brazilian Confirmation Order, provided that the Brazilian Confirmation Order is not overturned or altered as a result of the pending appeals filed against it by certain creditors, the unsecured claims against the RJ Debtors have been novated and discharged under Brazilian law and holders of such claims are entitled only to receive the recoveries set forth in the RJ Plan in exchange for their claims in accordance with the terms and conditions of the RJ Plan. As of the date of this annual report, there are several appeals of the Brazilian Confirmation Order pending.

If the Brazilian Confirmation Order is overturned or modified and, as a result, the RJ Debtors are declared bankrupt, which under Brazilian law is generally followed by a liquidation of the debtors’ assets, the rights and guarantees of the creditors recognized by the RJ Court will be restored under the original terms as if the RJ Plan had never been approved, net of amounts validly received pursuant to the RJ Plan, in accordance with Brazilian Bankruptcy Law. A modification of the Brazilian Confirmation Order may lead to a breach of the RJ Plan by the debtors.RJ Debtors. In case of breach of the RJ Plan by the RJ Debtors, creditors will be entitled to (1) approve a modification to the RJ Plan at a meeting of creditors complying with the quorum requirements established in the Brazilian Bankruptcy Law, or (2) seek to have the RJ Debtors adjudicated as bankrupt by the RJ Court.

We have identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting which has materially adversely affected our ability to timely and accurately report our results of operations and financial condition. This material weaknesses may not have been fully remediated as of the filing date of this annual report and we cannot assure you that other material weaknesses will not be identified in the future.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer, our management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018 based on the criteria established in “Internal Control —Integrated Framework (2013)” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment, our management concluded that as of December 31, 2018, our internal control over financial reporting was not effective because a material weakness existed. A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual consolidated financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. For more information about this material weakness, see “Item 15. Controls and Procedures.”

Although we have implemented and continue to implement measures designed to remediate this material weakness and, in the short term, to mitigate the potential adverse effects of this material weakness, our assessment of the impact of these measures has not been completed as of the filing date of this annual report and we cannot assure you that these measures are adequate. Moreover, we cannot assure you that additional material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting will not arise or be identified in the future.

As a result, we must continue our remediation activities and must also continue to improve our operational, information technology, and financial systems, infrastructure, procedures, and controls, as well as continue to expand, train, retain, and manage our employee base. Any failure to do so, or any difficulties we encounter during implementation, could result in additional material weaknesses or in material misstatements in our financial statements. These misstatements could result in a future restatement of our financial statements, could cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations, or could cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and may generate negative market reactions, potentially leading to a decline in the price of our Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs.

We are subject to numerous legal and administrative proceedings, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We are subject to numerous legal and administrative proceedings. It is difficult to quantify the potential impact of these legal and administrative proceedings. We classify our risk of loss from legal and administrative proceedings as “probable,” “possible” or “remote.” We make provisions for probable losses but do not make provisions for possible and remote losses.

As of December 31, 2018,2019, we had provisioned R$5,0395,252 million for probable losses relating to various tax, labor and civil legal and administrative proceedings against us. As of December 31, 2018,2019, we had claims against us of R$27,58628,416 million in tax proceedings, R$771798 million in labor proceedings and R$1,7231,668 million in civil proceedings with a risk of loss classified as “possible” for which we had made no provisions. We are not required to disclose or record provisions for proceedings in which our management judges the risk of loss to be remote. However, the amounts involved in certain of the proceedings in which we believe our risk of loss is remote could be substantial. Consequently, our losses could be significantly higher than the amounts for which we have recorded provisions.

If we are subject to unfavorable decisions in any legal or administrative proceedings and the losses in those proceedings significantly exceed the amount for which we have provisioned or involve proceedings for which we have made no provision, our results of operations and financial condition may be materially adversely affected. Even for the amounts recorded as provisions for probable losses, a judgment against us would have an effect on our cash flow if we are required to pay those amounts. Unfavorable decisions in these legal proceedings may, therefore, reduce our liquidity and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. For a more detailed description of these proceedings, see “Item 8. Financial Information—Legal Proceedings.”

We have indemnification obligations with respect to the PT Exchange Agreement and the PT Portugal Dispositiondisposition that could materially adversely affect our financial position.

In the exchange agreement, or the PT Exchange Agreement, that we entered into with Pharol under which we transferred defaulted commercial paper of Rio Forte Investments S.A., or Rio Forte, to Pharol in exchange for the delivery to our company of Common Shares and Preferred Shares as described under “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—Major Shareholders—PT Option Agreement,” we agreed to indemnify Pharol against any loss arising from (1) Pharol’s contingent or absolute tax or anti-trust obligations in relation to the assets contributed to our company in the Oi capital increase in connection with which we acquired PT Portugal from Pharol in May 2014 and (2) Pharol’s management activities, with reference to acts or triggering events occurring on or prior to May 5, 2014, excluding any losses incurred by Pharol as a result of the financial investments in the Rio Forte commercial paper and the acquisition of the Rio Forte commercial paper from Oi under the PT Exchange Agreement.

In the PTP Share Purchase Agreementshare purchase agreement under which we sold PT Portugal in the PT Portugal Disposition,disposition, we agreed to indemnify Altice Portugal for breaches of our representations and warranties under the PTPshare purchase agreement, subject to certain customary procedural and financial limitations. There can be no assurance that we will not be subject to significant claims under these indemnification provisions and if we are subject to such claims under these indemnification provisions, we could be required to pay significant amounts, which would have an adverse effect on our financial condition.

In the PT Ventures Share Purchase Agreement under which we sold PT Ventures to Sociedade Nacional de Combustíveis de Angola, Empresa Pública – Sonangol E.P., or Sonangol, we agreed to indemnify Sonangol for breaches of our representations and warranties under the PT Ventures Share Purchase Agreement, subject to certain customary procedural and financial limitations. There can be no assurance that we will not be subject to significant claims under these indemnification provisions and if we are subject to such

claims under these indemnification provisions, we could be required to pay significant amounts, which would have an adverse effect on our financial condition.

We are subject to credit risks with respect to our customers. If we are unable to limit payment delinquencies by our customers, or if delinquent payments by our customers increase, our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

Our business significantly depends on our customers’ ability to pay their bills and comply with their obligations to us. During 2018,2019, we recorded provisions for doubtful accounts in the amount of R$1,070489 million, or 4.9%2.4% of our net operating revenue, primarily due to subscribers’ delinquencies. As of December 31, 2018,2019, our provision for doubtful accounts was R$1,870774 million.

ANATEL regulations allow us to implement certain policies to reduce customer defaults, such as service restrictions or limitations on the types of services provided based on a subscriber’s credit record. If we are unable to successfully implement policies to limit delinquencies of our Brazilian subscribers or otherwise select our customers based on their credit records, persistent subscriber delinquencies and bad debt will continue to adversely affect our operating and financial results.

In addition, if the Brazilian economy declines due to, among other factors, a reduction in the level of economic activity, an increase in inflation or an increase in domestic interest rates, a greater portion of our customers may not be able to pay their bills on a timely basis, whichbasis. For example, although do not have sufficient experience with the effects of the public health measures adopted in Brazil in response to theCOVID-19 pandemic to reliably estimate the quantitative effects of these measures, we expect that these public health measures will have significant impacts on the income and purchasing power of many of our subscribers, particularlylow-income subscribers and SMEs, some of whom may cease operations. Any increase in expected losses on trade receivables would increase our provision for doubtful accounts and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

We are dependent on key personnel and the ability to hire and retain additional personnel.

We believe that our success will depend on the continued services of our senior management team and other key personnel. Our management team is comprised of highly qualified professionals, with extensive experience in the telecommunications industry. The loss of the services of any of our senior management team or other key employees could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. We also depend on the ability of our senior management and key personnel to work effectively as a team.

Our future success also depends on our ability to identify, attract, hire, train, retain and motivate highly skilled technical, managerial, sales and marketing personnel. Competition for such personnel is intense, and we cannot guarantee that we will successfully attract, assimilate or retain a sufficient number of qualified personnel. Failure to retain and attract the necessary technical, managerial, sales and marketing and administrative personnel could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Certain membersThe outcome of Operation Mine Map, a criminal investigation being conducted by Brazilian authorities that involves historical agreements of our management are subjectcompany with certain entities, and any further investigations that may be commenced related to administrative proceedings in Brazil, whichthese agreements, could lead to their removal from office.have a material adverse effect on our company.

InOn December 2018, we became aware that10, 2019, the Enforcement OfficeBrazilian Federal Police launched Operation Mine Map (Superintendência de Processos SancionadoresOperaçãoMapa da Mina) and the Office. One of the Chief Counselor (Procuradoria Federal Especializada)main targets of Operation Mine Map was Fábio da Silva, son of former president Luiz Ignácio Lula da Silva. The subject of the CVM issued Reportsinvestigation includes payments made by us to two groups of companies, Gamecorp and Grupo Gol. Brazilian authorities allege that these payments were made in Punitive Administrative Proceedings proposing liabilityexchange for certain persons, including Euricobenefits from the Brazilian government. In connection with the investigation, our headquarters and some other buildings in the States of São Paulo and Rio de Jesus Teles Neto,Janeiro and in Brasília were searched and documents were seized relating to our chiefbusiness with Gamecorp and Grupo Gol.

We have been cooperating with Brazilian authorities involved in Operation Mine Map and have provided information and documents. We have not been notified that we are a target of any investigation relating to Operation Mine Map. None of our current executive officer, and José Mauro Mettrau Carneiro da Cunha, a memberofficers or members of our board of directors and other of our former directors, executive officers and former or current shareholders, for alleged violations of the Brazilian Corporate Law in connection with facts related to the corporate reorganization between Oi and Pharol, which was announced in October 2013, and our subsequent capital increase, in which Pharol increased its holdingswere involved in our share capital, which was completed in May 2014.historical relationships with Gamecorp and Grupo Gol.

If any such persons are found liable in these Punitive Administrative Proceedings, they will be subject to a penalty, which may vary from a warning to disqualification from acting as a member of the board of directors or board of executive officers of any publicly-held company in Brazil for a period of up to 20 years. We cannot predict when these Punitive Administrative Proceedingsthe Operation Mine Mapinvestigation will be concluded.

The losscompleted or the results of such investigation, including whether any litigation or enforcement action will be brought against us or the servicesoutcome or impact of any of our senior management teamresulting litigation or enforcement action, nor can we predict any potential actions that may be taken by the relevant authorities. Any adverse development in the Operation Mine Mapinvestigation could subject us to potential fines or penalties under applicable law, materially adversely affect our business, financial conditionpublic reputation, and results of operations.could have a material adverse effect on us, including: (1) threatening our ability to obtain new financing, which could impair our ability to operate our business; and (2) shifting management’s focus to these matters, which could harm our ability to meet our strategic objectives. Additionally, while we have taken, and are continuing to take, measures to enhance our compliance programs, which are intended to assist us in detecting and preventing bribery and corruption, there can be no assurance that these efforts will enable us to detect or prevent all such activities.

We could be adversely affected by violations of anti-corruption laws and regulations.

We are required to comply with Brazilian anti-corruption laws and regulations, including Brazilian Law No. 12,846/2013, or the Brazilian Anti-Corruption Law, as well as anti-corruption laws and regulations in other jurisdictions, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, or the FCPA.

The Brazilian Anti-Corruption Law, the FCPA and similar anti-corruption laws in other jurisdictions generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to government officials or other persons for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. Recent years have seen a substantial increase in anti-corruption law enforcement activity, with more frequent and aggressive investigations and enforcement proceedings by both the U.S. Department of Justice and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, increased enforcement activity bynon-U.S. regulators, and increases in criminal and civil proceedings brought against companies and individuals. Our policies mandate compliance with these anti-corruption laws. We operate, through our businesses, in countries that are recognized as having governmental and commercial corruption. We cannot assure you that our internal control policies and procedures will protect us from reckless or criminal acts committed by our employees, the employees of any of our businesses, or third party intermediaries. In the event that we believe or have reason to believe that our employees or agents have or may have violated applicable anti-corruption laws, including the FCPA, we may be required to investigate or have outside counsel investigate the relevant facts and circumstances, which can be expensive and require significant time and attention from senior management. Violations of these laws may result in criminal or civil sanctions, inability to do business with existing or future business partners (either as a result of express prohibitions or to avoid the appearance of impropriety), injunctions against future conduct, profit disgorgements, disqualifications from directly or indirectly engaging in certain types of businesses, the loss of business permits or other restrictions which could disrupt our business and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

Risks Relating to Our Operations

We face significant competition in the Brazilian market and increasing competition from other services, which may adversely affect our results of operations.

We face increasing competition throughout Brazil from other telecommunications service providers in each of our core service businesses. In our Residential Services business, we compete with other fixed-line voice service providers, primarily Claro S.A., or Claro, a subsidiary of América Móvil S.A.B. de C.V., or Claro, and Telefônica Brasil S.A., a subsidiary of Telefónica S.A., or Telefônica Brasil. In addition to Claro and Telefônica Brasil, our Residential Services business competes for broadband subscribers with a myriad of smaller local and regional broadband services providers. Finally, our Residential Services business competes forPay-TV broadband subscribers with Claro and SKY Brasil Serviços Ltda., or SKY, and Telefônica Brasil. In our Personal Mobility Services business, we compete with Telefônica Brasil, Claro, and TIM Participações S.A., a subsidiary of Telecom Italia S.p.A., or TIM. In our Business to Business, or B2B, Services business, we compete with all of these competitors for small- andmedium-sized enterprise, or SME, and corporate subscribers (including governmental entities) for our fixed-line and mobile services.

Our primary competitors, Telefônica Brasil, TIM and Claro are each controlled by multinational companies that may have more significant financial and marketing resources, and greater abilities to access capital on a timely basis and on more favorable terms, than our company.

As a result of competition from mobile services, we expect (1) the number of our fixed lines in service to continue to decline as some of our customers eliminate their fixed-line services in favor of mobile services, and (2) the use of existing fixed lines for making voice calls to decline, as customers replace fixed-line calls in favor of calls on mobile phones as a result of the emergence of“all-net” plans, which allow a customer to make calls to any fixed-line or mobile device of any operator for a flat monthly fee. The reduction in the number of our fixed lines in service has negatively affected and is likely to continue to negatively affect our net operating revenue and margins.

The primary drivers of competition in the broadband industry are stability and quality of the service, speed and price, with discounts typically offered in the form of bundled services. Claro and Telefônica Brasil each offer broadband services at higher speeds than ours and both offer integrated voice, broadband andPay-TV services, typically as bundles, to the residential services market through a single network infrastructure. In addition, an increasing number of small local and regional providers are competing in the broadband space offering fiber to the home (FTTH)fiber-to-the-home, or FTTH, at competitive prices. Future offerings by our competitors that are aggressively priced or that offer additional services could have an adverse effect on our net operating revenue and our results of operations.

We offerPay-TV services throughout the regions in which we provide residential services. Future changesThePay-TV market in satellite technology mayBrazil has been facing a steady drop in the number of subscribers since 2015 as a result of the financial crisis, piracy, and an increase in one of our competitors utilizing new satellites for DTH services that have higher capacities or better quality of service, which could adversely affect our net operating revenue and may adversely affect our results of operations. In addition, as is happening mature markets, the growthcord-cutting effect resulting from more widespread use of OTT services in Brazil, may further diminish the attractiveness of DTH services, which provide less user interaction. such as Netflix, Amazon Prime Video, HBO Go and others.

We and each of our principal competitors in the mobile telecommunications market offer UMTS (UniversalUniversal Mobile Telecommunications System)System (UMTS), or 3G, and our LTE (LongLong Term Evolution)Evolution (LTE), or 4G, mobile telecommunications network technology. TheOur competitors have a much larger coverage footprint (in terms of cities covered) than we do both in 3G and 4G. In addition, the cost of maintaining our revenue share in this market may increase and in the future we may incur higher advertising and other costs as we attempt to maintain or expand our market presence. As mobile interconnection, or MTR, tariffs have declined in recent years, a trend towards SIM card consolidation has developed, reversing the trend of customers using multiple SIM cards to participate inon-net calling plans offered by multiple service providers; this trend has resulted, and may continue to result in, a decline in the size of our customer base. Acquiring each additional personal mobility customer entails costs, including sales commissions and marketing costs. Recovering these costs depends on our ability to retain such customers. Therefore, high rates of customer churn could have a material adverse effect on the profitability of our Personal Mobility Services business. During the year ended December 31, 2018,2019, the average monthly churn rate of our Personal Mobility Services business, representing the number of subscribers whose service was disconnected during each month, whether voluntarily or involuntarily, divided by the number of subscribers at the beginning of such month, was 4.0%3.28% per month. Our inability to compete effectively to maintain and increase our market share in this market could adversely affect our net operating revenue and profitability.

Our mobile subscribers are demanding higher quality and more data availability, which require higher investments in development, modernization, expansion and continuous improvement in service quality and customers’ experience. As discussed above, some of our competitors may have greater access to cheaper capital and the ability to invest in new technologies, including 4.5G.4.5G and 700 MHz frequencies. Oi is the only operator in the market that does not have a license for the 700 MHz frequency.

As a result of the increased availability of 4G mobile network technology, there has been an increase in the use ofover-the-top, or OTT services in Brazil, including instant internet messaging and Voice over Internet Protocol, or VoIP, and services on smartphone applications such as Facebook Messenger and WhatsApp. OTT applications are often free of charge, other than for data usage, accessible by smartphones, tablets and computers and allow their users to have access to potentially unlimited messaging and voice services over the Internet,internet, bypassing more expensive traditional voice and messaging services such astwo-way short (or text) message services known as SMS, which have historically been, but are no longer a source of significant revenues. With the growing use of smartphones in Brazil, an increasing number of customers are using OTT application services as a substitute for traditional voice or SMS communications. As a result, of this scenario, we see the migration of traffic from voice to data and consequently the introduction of offers from almost all competitors of unlimited voice plans in their portfolio, accelerating the process of commoditization of voice service. These trends could have an adverse effect on the average revenue per unit, or ARPU, generated by our mobile customer base and our profitability.

TheCOVID-19 pandemic could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

Since December 2019,SARS-CoV-2, a novel strain of coronavirus referred to asCOVID-19, has spread throughout the world. On January 31, 2020, the World Health Organization announced thatCOVID-19 was a global health emergency and on March 3, 2020, the World Health Organization categorizedCOVID-19 as a pandemic. TheCOVID-19 pandemic has resulted in numerous deaths and the imposition of local, municipal and national governmental“shelter-in-place” and other public health measures, border closures and other travel restrictions, causing unprecedented economic disruption in much of the world, including in Brazil.

The local, national and international response to the virus is quickly developing, fluid and uncertain. During March and April of 2020, state, local and municipal authorities within Brazil promoted and enforced public health measures, including social isolation and quarantine measures, and have enacted regulations limiting the operations of“non-essential” businesses. Inmid-March 2020, Rio de Janeiro and other Brazilian states declared a state of emergency. Although the Brazilian government has determined that the telecom sector is an essential service, which allows us to continue our field maintenance activities without violating restrictions on movement that have generally been imposed to combat the pandemic, in accordance with the recommendations of the authorities, we transitioned a substantial majority of our employees to work from home.

Although we have devoted considerable resources to preventative measures in order to reduce the potential impacts of theCOVID-19 pandemic on our employees, business, service and operations, there can be no assurance that these measures will be effective or that the pandemic will not have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. For example, public health measures could affect our network quality in the event that our networks are unable to meet increased demand as a result of orders from the authorities that individuals stay at or work at home. In addition, sales of certain of our products and services, such as services offered throughdoor-to-door sales channels and sales made through our retail stores, will be reduced as a result of public health measures, which could negatively impact us. The impact of public health measures adopted in Brazil on the income and purchasing power of our subscribers, particularlylow-income subscribers and SMEs, some of whom may cease operations, could reduce their ability to pay us for services, which could result in a decline in our cash flows from operations and an increase in our expected losses on trade receivables. If any applicable governmental body imposes rules preventing our termination services as a result ofnon-payment, thus encouraging customer defaults on invoices, such measures are likely to result in a decline in our cash flows from operations and an increase in our expected losses on trade receivables. Finally, as a result of restrictions on certain activities, it is possible that our personnel may be unable to perform routine maintenance and installation activities, which could adversely affect our operations and sales. For more information about specific measures that we have adopted and potential impacts on our business operations, see “Item. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Principal Factors Affecting Our Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Potential Effects of theCOVID-19 Pandemic.

We cannot predict the full effect of the pandemic on our business or on the Brazilian economy. Federal, state and municipal governments in Brazil may announce further restrictions on the general population and we cannot predict what effect this will have on our operations and sales in the long term. We cannot predict the duration of the pandemic, the effectiveness of governmental or other measures taken to attempt to curb the pandemic, or the duration of any such measures. In addition, following the pandemic and the termination of any such governmental restrictions, the needs and preferences of our customers may have been altered. None of the losses incurred or to be incurred by us as a result of theCOVID-19 pandemic, whether as a result of business interruption or inability to attract new customers, is covered by insurance currently held by us. As a result, any such losses could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

We may be unable to implement our plans to expand and enhance our existing networks in Brazil in a timely manner or without unanticipated costs, which could hinder or prevent the successful implementation of our business plan and result in revenues and net income being less than expected.

Our business as a telecommunications services provider depends on our ability to maintain and expand our telecommunications services network. Our ability to achieve our strategic objectives depends in large part on the successful, timely and cost-effective implementation of our plans to expand and enhance our networks in Brazil. We believe that our expected growth will require, among other things:

 

continuous development of our operational and administrative systems;

 

efficiently allocating our capital;

 

increasing marketing activities;

 

improving our understanding of customer wants and needs;

 

continuous attention to service quality; and

 

attracting, training and retaining qualified management, technical, customer relations, and sales personnel.

We believe that these requirements will place significant demand on our managerial, operational and financial resources. Factors that could affect our implementation of our growth strategy include:

 

our ability to generate cash flow or to obtain future financing necessary to implement our projects;

 

delays in the delivery of telecommunications equipment by our vendors;vendors, which could be exacerbated by the effects of theCOVID-19 pandemic on the operations of our equipment suppliers;

 

the failure of the telecommunications equipment supplied by our vendors to comply with the expected capabilities;

 

the failure to obtain licenses necessary for our projects; and

 

delays resulting from the failure of third-party suppliers or contractors to meet their obligations in a timely and cost-effective manner.manner, which could be exacerbated by the effects of theCOVID-19 pandemic on the operations of our third-party suppliers or contractors.

Although we believe that our cost estimates and implementation schedule are reasonable and have not been affected by factors relating to theCOVID-19 pandemic, we cannot assure you that the actual costs or time required to complete the implementation of these projects will not substantially exceed our current estimates.estimates, particularly if theCOVID-19 pandemic increases in severity or extends over a prolonged period of time. Any significant cost overrun or delay could hinder or prevent the successful implementation of our business plan and result in revenues and net income being less than expected. Failure to manage successfully our expected growth could reduce the quality of our services, with adverse effects on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We make investments based on demand forecasts that may become inaccurate due to economic volatility and may result in revenues that are lower than expected.

We make certain investments, such as the procurement of materials and the development of our network infrastructure, based on our forecasts of the amount of demand that customers will have for our services at a later date. However, any major changes in the Brazilian economic scenario may affect this demand and therefore our forecasts may turn out to be inaccurate. For example, economic impacts of theCOVID-19 pandemic and the public health measures adopted in Brazil to combat this pandemic, economic crises maythat restrict credit to the population, and uncertainties relating to employment may result in a delay in the decision to acquire new products or services (such as broadband orPay-TV). As a result, it is possible that we may make larger investments based on demand forecasts than were necessary given actual demand at the relevant time, which may directly affect our cash flow.

Furthermore, improvements in economic conditions may have the opposite effect. For example, an increase in demand not accompanied by our investment in improved infrastructure may result in a possible loss of opportunity to increase our revenue or result in the degradation of the quality of our services.

We rely on strategic suppliers of equipment, materials and certain services necessary for our operations and expansion. If these suppliers fail to provide equipment, materials or services to us on a timely basis, we could experience disruptions, which could have an adverse effect on our revenues and results of operations.

We are in processesthe process of vendor consolidation by using only on a few strategic and most representative technology suppliers around the world to provide us with equipment and materials that we need in order to expand and to operate our business in Brazil. In addition, we rely on a third-party provider of network maintenance services in certain regions werewhere we operate. There are a limited number of suppliers with the capability of providing the mobile network equipment and fixed-line network platforms that our operations and expansion plans require or the services that we require to maintain our networks. In addition, because the supply of mobile network equipment and fixed-line network platforms requires detailed supply planning and this equipment is technologically complex, it would be difficult for our company to replace the suppliers of this equipment. Suppliers of cables that we need to extend and maintain our networks may suffer capacity constraints or difficulties in obtaining the raw materials required to manufacture these cables. As a result, we are exposed to risks associated with these suppliers, including restrictions of production capacity for equipment and materials, availability of equipment and materials, delays in delivery of equipment, materials or services, and price increases.increases, many of which may be exacerbated by the effects of theCOVID-19 pandemic and public health measures in Brazil and internationally to combat the pandemic. If these suppliers or vendors fail to provide equipment, materials or services to us on a timely basis or otherwise in compliance with the terms of our contracts with these suppliers, we could experience disruptions or declines in the quality of our services, which could have an adverse effect on our revenues and results of operations, and we might be unable to satisfy the requirements contained in our concession and authorization agreements.

Certain key inputs areessential equipment is subject to risks related to importation, and we acquire other key inputsessential equipment from a limited number of domestic suppliers, which may further limit our ability to acquire such inputsessential equipment in a timely and cost effective manner.

The high growth in data markets in general, and broadband in particular, may result in a limited supply of equipment essential for the provision of such services, such as data transmission equipment and modems. The restrictions on the number of manufacturers imposed by the Brazilian government for certain inputs,essential equipment, mainly data transmission equipment and modems, and the geographical locations ofnon-Brazilian manufacturers of these inputs,this essential equipment, pose certain risks, including:

 

vulnerability to currency fluctuations in cases where inputs areessential equipment is imported and paid for with U.S. dollars, Euros or other foreign currencies;currencies, which could be exacerbated by the macroeconomic effects in Brazil of theCOVID-19 pandemic and the public health measures adopted in Brazil to combat the pandemic;

 

difficulties in managing inventory due to an inability to accurately forecast the domestic availability of certain inputs;essential equipment, which could be exacerbated by the effects of theCOVID-19 pandemic and the public health measures adopted in Brazil to combat the pandemic; and

 

the imposition of customs or other duties on key inputsessential equipment that areis imported.

If any of these risks materialize, they may result in our inability to provide services to our customers in a timely manner or may affect the prices of our services, which may have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may be unable to respond to the trend towards consolidation in the Brazilian telecommunications market.

The Brazilian telecommunications market has been subject to consolidation. Mergers and acquisitions may change market dynamics, create competitive pressures and force small competitors to find partners, and may require us to adjust our operations, marketing strategies, and product portfolio. For example, in March 2015, Telefónica S.A., or Telefónica, acquired from Vivendi S.A., all of the shares of GVT Participações S.A., the controlling shareholder of Global Village Telecom S.A. This acquisition increased Telefónica’s share of the Brazilian telecommunications market, and we believe such trend is likely to continue in the industry as participants continue to pursue economies of scale. The entry of a new market participant with significant financial resources or potential changes in strategy by existing telecommunications service providers can change the competitive environment in the Brazilian market. We may be unable to keep pace with these changes, which could affect our ability to compete effectively and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Additional joint ventures, mergers and acquisitions among telecommunications service providers are possible in the future. If such consolidation occurs, it may result in increased competition within our market. We may be unable to adequately respond to pricing pressures resulting from consolidation in our market, adversely affecting our business, financial condition and results of operations. We may also consider engaging in merger or acquisition activity in response to changes in the competitive environment, which could divert resources away from other aspects of our business.

Our commitment to meet the obligations of our Brazilian employees’ pension plans, managed by Fundação Sistel de Seguridade Social and Fundação Atlântico de Seguridade Social may be higher than what is currently anticipated, and therefore, we may be required to make additional contributions of resources to these pension plans or to record liabilities or expenses that are higher than currently recorded.

As sponsors of certain private employee pension plans in Brazil, which are managed by Fundação Sistel de Seguridade Social, or Sistel, and Fundação Atlântico de Seguridade Social, or FATL, our subsidiaries cover the actuarial deficits of these pension benefit plans, which provide guaranteed benefits to our retirees in Brazil and guaranteed future benefits to our current Brazilian employees at the time of their retirement. As of December 31, 2018,2019, our Brazilian pension benefit plans had an aggregate deficit of R$579633 million. Our commitment to meet these deficit obligations may be higher than we currently anticipate, and we may be required to make additional contributions or record liabilities or expenses that are higher than we currently record, which may adversely affect our financial results. If the life expectancy of the beneficiaries should exceed the life expectancies included in the actuarial models, the level of our contributions to these plans could increase. If the managers of these plans should suffer losses on the investments of the assets of these plans, we would be required to make additional contributions to these plans in order for these plans to be able to provide the agreed benefits. Any increase in the level of our contributions to these plans as a result of an increase in life expectancy or a decline in investment returns could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. For a more detailed description of our Brazilian pension plans, see “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Employees—Employee Benefits—Pension Benefit Plans.”

As a result of the RJ Proceedings, certain of our unfunded obligations under our post-retirement plans were novated. As of December 31, 2018,2019, we had recorded R$575633 million on our balance sheet as “liability for pension benefits,” net of provision for unfunded status on our balance sheet, represented by the commitment under the terms of the RJ Plan related to the financial obligations agreement, entered into by Oi and FATL intended for the payment of the mathematical provision without coverage by the plan’s assets. For more information, see “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Employees—Employee Benefits—Pension Benefit Plans—Fundação Atlântico de Seguridade Social—TCSPREV Plan” and note 2327 to our audited consolidated financial statements included in this annual report.

Any impairment of the fair value at which we record our indirect investment in Unitel in our financial statements would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

As of December 31, 2018, we recorded assets held for sale of R$4,923 million in our consolidated financial statements, mainly relating to our interest in Unitel, including R$2,567 million of accrued dividends owed to our company by Unitel and R$1,760 million representing the fair value of Africatel’s 25% interest in Unitel, and recorded as liabilities directly associated with assets held for sale of R$527 million, mainly relating to our interest in Unitel. The fair value of Africatel’s 25% interest in Unitel is estimated based on the internal valuation made, including cash flows forecasts for a five-year period, the choice of a growth rate to extrapolate the cash flows projections, and definition of appropriate discount rates and foreign exchange rates. In addition to the financial and business assumptions referred to above, we also take into consideration the fair value measurement of cash investments, qualitative assumptions, including the impacts of developments in our litigation against Unitel and the other Unitel shareholders, including the recently concluded international arbitration, and the opinion of the legal counsel on the outcome of this litigation.

For many years, the other shareholders of Unitel have breached several provisions of the Unitel shareholders’ agreement. Although PT Ventures is entitled to appoint three of the five members of Unitel’s board of directors, the other shareholders of Unitel failed to vote for nominees to Unitel’s board of directors nominated by PT Ventures. Although PT Ventures is entitled to appoint Unitel’s managing director, subject to the approval of the holders of 75% of Unitel’s shares, the other shareholders of Unitel failed to appoint PT Ventures’ nominee as Unitel’s managing director.

In October 2015, PT Ventures initiated an arbitration proceeding against the other shareholders of Unitel before the International Chamber of Commerce as a result of the violation by those shareholders of a variety of provisions of the Unitel shareholders’ agreement, including the provisions entitling PT Ventures to nominate the majority of the members of the board of directors of Unitel and its managing director. On February 20, 2019, the arbitral tribunal issued a final award finding that repeated breaches of the Unitel shareholders’ agreement by the other shareholders of Unitel resulted in a significant decrease of value of PT Ventures’ stake in Unitel and ordered the other shareholders of Unitel to pay PT Ventures US$339.4 million, corresponding to the loss of value of PT Ventures’ stake in Unitel, plus interest at12-month US dollar LIBOR +2%, compounded annually from the date of the award.

On March 19, 2019, Unitel held a general shareholders meeting during which a new board of directors was elected, including, among its five members, two members nominated by PT Ventures, including one member who will also serve as the managing director of Unitel. We cannot assure you that PT Ventures will be successful in its efforts to enforce the award of the arbitral tribunal or that the other shareholders of Unitel will not breach the provisions of the Unitel shareholders’ agreement in the future.

The book value of our indirect investment in Unitel is subjected to testing for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the value of our indirect investment in Unitel may be lower than the fair value at which we carry this investment. For the year ended December 31, 2018, we recorded impairment charges of R$491 million as a result of our review of the fair value of our investment in Unitel and R$187 million related to impairment dividends. Any further impairment of our indirect investment in Unitel may result in a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

We cannot assure you as to when PT Ventures will realize the accounts receivable recorded with respect to the declared and unpaid dividends owed to PT Ventures by Unitel or when PT Ventures will receive dividends that have been declared or that may be declared by Unitel in the future.

Since November 2012, PT Ventures has not received payments for outstanding amounts owed to it by Unitel with respect to dividends declared by Unitel for several fiscal years. Based on the dividends declared by Unitel of which PT Ventures has not received its share of payment, PT Ventures has an estimated recoverable amount of US$662 million (R$2,567 million) as of December 31, 2018.

On several occasions, PT Ventures has requested an explanation from Unitel about its failure to pay to PT Ventures its share of the declared dividends. As of the date of this annual report, PT Ventures has not received a satisfactory explanation regarding this failure to pay, nor has PT Ventures received reliable indications as to the expected timing of the payment of the accrued dividends. As a result, on October 20, 2015, PT Ventures filed a suit in the Provincial Courts of Luanda seeking payment of outstanding dividends declared in 2010 as well as the dividends for the fiscal years 2011 through 2013, together with interest thereon. PT Ventures has also filed a claim against the other Unitel shareholders in its arbitration proceeding against the other shareholders of Unitel before the International Chamber of Commerce for the payment of the outstanding dividends.

As part of its February 20, 2019 final award, the arbitral tribunal found that the other shareholders of Unitel failed, after November 2012, to ensure that PT Ventures received the same amount of dividends in foreign currency as the othernon-Angolan shareholder of Unitel and ordered the other shareholders of Unitel to pay PT Ventures the amount of US$307 million, corresponding to the resulting damages, plus simple interest on this amount accruing from the dates on which PT Ventures should have received those dividends, at a 7% annual rate. In addition, the arbitral award recognized PT Ventures’ entitlement to the payment from Unitel for all of the owed and unpaid dividends, reduced by the amount, if any, that PT Ventures collects from the other Unitel shareholders in the enforcement of the award.

We cannot assure you that PT Ventures will be successful in its pending suit in the Angolan courts or in its efforts to enforce the award of the arbitral tribunal, as to the timing of the payment of the accrued dividends to our company, or whether we will be able to receive dividends that have been declared or that may be declared by Unitel in the future. Our inability to receive these dividends could have a material adverse impact on the fair value of our investment in Unitel, our financial position and our results of operations.

Risks Relating to Brazil

The Brazilian government has exercised, and continues to exercise, significant influence over the Brazilian economy. This influence, as well as Brazilian political and economic conditions, could adversely impact our business, results of operations and financial condition and on the market prices of our common shares,Common Shares, preferred shares and ADSs.

Oi is a Brazilian corporation, and substantially all of our operations and customers are located in Brazil. Accordingly, our financial condition and results of operations are substantially dependent on Brazil’s economy. The Brazilian federal government frequently exercises significant influence over the Brazilian economy and occasionally makes significant changes in policy and regulations. The Brazilian government’s actions to control inflation and implement macroeconomic policies have often involved, among other measures, changes in interest rates, changes in tax policies, wage and price controls, foreign exchange controls, currency devaluations, blocking access to bank accounts, imposing capital controls and limits on imports. We do not have any control over, and are unable to predict, which measures or policies the Brazilian government may adopt in the future. Our business, results of operations and financial condition and the market price of our common shares, preferred sharesCommon Shares, Preferred Shares and ADSs may be adversely affected by changes in government policies or regulations, especially those related to the telecommunications sector, such as changes in rates and competitive conditions, as well as general economic factors, including:

 

the rate of growth of the Brazilian economy;

 

economic, political or social instability;

 

fluctuating exchange rates;

 

inflation;

 

interest rates and monetary policies;

 

reductions in salaries or income levels and unemployment rates;

 

liquidity of domestic capital and lending markets;

 

energy policy;

 

exchange controls and restrictions on remittances abroad;

 

changes to the regulatory framework governing our industry;

 

fiscal policies and changes in tax laws;

 

labor and social security policies, laws and regulations; and

 

other political, diplomatic, social and economic developments in or affecting Brazil.

Uncertainty over whether the Brazilian federal government will implement changes to the policies, regulations or standards affecting these or other factors in the future may affect economic performance and contribute to economic uncertainty in Brazil and to heightened volatility in the Brazilian securities markets and securities issued abroad by Brazilian issuers, which may have an adverse effect on us and the trading price of our common shares, preferred sharesCommon Shares, Preferred Shares and ADSs.

The ongoing economic uncertainty andOngoing political instability in Brazil mayhas adversely affectaffected the Brazilian economy, our business and results of operations and may adversely affect the market price of our common shares, preferred sharesCommon Shares, Preferred Shares and ADSs.

Brazil’sThe Brazilian economy has been affected by political environment has historically influenced, and continues to influence, the performance of the country’s economy. Political crisesevents in Brazil, which have also affected and continue to affect the confidence of investors and the public in general, public, which have historically resulted in economic decelerationadversely impacting the performance of the Brazilian economy and heightenedheightening the volatility in theof securities issued by Brazilian companies.

The recent economic instability in Brazil has contributedBrazilian markets have also experienced heightened volatility due to a decline in market confidence inuncertainties derived from the Brazilian economy as well as to a deteriorating political environment. In addition, various ongoing investigations into allegations of money laundering and corruption being conducted by the Office of the Brazilian Federal Prosecutor, includingPolice and the largest such investigation known as “LavaFederal Prosecutor’s Office (Ministério PúblicoFederal), among which is Operation Car Wash (OperaçãoLava Jato). Such investigations have negatively impacted the Brazilian economy and political environment. Numerous members of the Brazilian government and of the legislative branch, as well as senior officers of large state-owned and private companies, have been convicted of political corruption related to bribes by means of kickbacks on contracts granted by the government to several infrastructure, oil and gas and construction companies, among others. Profits of these kickbacks allegedly financed the political campaigns of political parties that were unaccounted for or not publicly disclosed, and served to further the personal enrichment of the recipients of the bribery schemes. As a result, a number of senior politicians, including former president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, congressmen and officers of the major state-owned and private companies in Brazil, resigned and/or have been arrested, and numerous senior elected officials and other public officials are being investigated for unethical and illegal behavior.

The outcome of these investigations is uncertain, but they have already had an adverse impact on the image and reputation of the implicated companies, and on the general market perception of Brazil. The development of these investigations has and may continue to adversely affect us. We cannot predict whether the ongoing investigations will affect the market or will lead to heightened economic and political volatility in Brazil, nor whether new investigations against politicians and/or officers of private companies will occur in the future.

In recent years, there has been significant political turmoiladdition, in connection withOctober 2018, Brazilians elected federal congressmen, state congressmen,two-thirds of the impeachmenttotal number of President Dilma Rousseff (who was removed fromsenators and governors, and the president, and the new elected officials took office in August 2016) and investigationsat the beginning of her successor, President Michel Temer (who left office2019. Following a divisive presidential race, Congressman Jair Bolsonaro became Brazil’s president on January 1, 2019)2019.

Any continuation of such divisions could result in congressional deadlock, political unrest and massive demonstrations and/or strikes that could materially adversely affect our operations. Uncertainties in relation to the implementation by the new administration of changes relating to monetary, tax and pension funds policies, as partwell as to the relevant legislation that must be passed to implement them, may contribute to economic instability. These uncertainties and new measures may increase market volatility of the ongoing “Lava Jato” investigations. President Jair Bolsonaro was elected in presidential elections that were held in Brazil in October 2018. Brazilian securities issued abroad.

The President of Brazil has considerablethe power to determine governmental policies and actions that relateissue governmental acts related to the Brazilian economy and, consequently,that affect the operations and financial performance of businesses such as our company.companies, including us. We cannot predict which policies President Bolsonaro, who assumed office on January 1, 2019, maythe newly elected president will adopt or change during his mandate or the effect that any such policies might have on our business and on the Brazilian economy. Any such newif these policies or changes toin current policies may have a materialan adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Furthermore, Brazil’s federal budget has been in deficit since 2014. Similarly, the governments of Brazil’s constituent states are also facing fiscal concerns due to their high debt burdens, declining revenues and inflexible expenditures. Whileus or the Brazilian Congress has approved a ceiling on government spending that will limit primary public expenditure growth to the prior year’s inflation for a period of at least 10 years, local and foreign investors believe that fiscal reforms, and in particular a reform of Brazil’s pension system, will be critical for Brazil to comply with the spending limit. As of the date of this annual report, discussions in the Brazilian Congress relating to such reforms remain ongoing. Diminished confidence in the Brazilian government’s budgetary condition and fiscal stance could result in downgrades of Brazil’s sovereign debt by credit rating agencies, negatively impact Brazil’s economy, lead to depreciation of thereal and increases in inflation and interest rates, thus adversely affecting our business, results of operations and financial condition.economy.

Uncertainty about the Brazilian government’s implementation of changes in policies or regulations that affect such implementation may contribute to economic instability in Brazil and increase the volatility of securities issued abroad by Brazilian companies, including our securities. Any of the above factors may create additional political uncertainty, adversely affect the Brazilian economy, our business, financial condition, results of operations and the market price of our common shares, preferred shares and ADSs.

Fluctuations in exchange rates may lead to substantial losses on our liabilities denominated in or linked to foreign currencies.

Since 1999, exchange rates for thereal have been set by the market, i.e., a floating exchange rate system. Although long-term depreciation of thereal is generally linked to the rate of inflation in Brazil, depreciation of thereal occurring over shorter periods of time has resulted in significant variations in the exchange rate between thereal, the U.S. dollar and other currencies. The exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the Brazilianreal has experienced significant fluctuations in recent years. Therealdepreciated by 13.4% during 2014 andagainst the U.S. dollar by 47.1% during 2015. InDuring 2016, thereal appreciated 16.5% against the U.S. dollar by 16.5% and in 2017, thereal depreciated 1.5%, followedagainst the U.S. dollar by another depreciation of1.5% in 2017, 17.1% in 2018.2018, and 4.0% in 2019.

As of December 31, 2018,2019, R$17,87318,294 million, or 58.8%57.8%, of our total consolidated loansborrowings and financingsfinancing was denominated in currencies other than thereal, excluding the fair value adjustment to our loansborrowings and financings,financing and debt issuance costs, and R$8,8279,521 million, or 53.7%52.2%, of our total consolidated loansborrowings and financingsfinancing was denominated in currencies other than thereal, after giving effect to the fair value adjustment to our loansborrowings and financing.financing and debt issuance costs. When thereal depreciates against foreign currencies, we incur losses on our liabilities denominated in foreign currencies, such as our U.S. dollar-denominated NewPIK Toggle Notes and export credit facilities, and we incur gains on our monetary assets denominated in or indexed to foreign currencies, as the liabilities and assets are translated intoreais. On the other hand, when therealdepreciates against foreign currencies, we incur gains on the balance of our fair value adjustment as a consequence of the gross debt balance.balance, which partially offsets the negative impact on our borrowings and financings. If significant depreciation of thereal were to occur when the value of such liabilities significantly exceeds the value of such assets, including any financial instruments entered into for hedging purposes, we could incur significant losses, even if the value of those assets and liabilities has not changed in their original currency. In addition, a significant depreciation in thereal could adversely affect our ability to meet certain of our payment obligations. A failure to meet certain of our payment obligations could trigger a default under certain financial covenants in our debt instruments, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

The significant depreciation of thereal subsequent to December 31, 2019, partially due to theCOVID-19 pandemic and the public health measures adopted to combat the pandemic in Brazil and internationally, is expected to have effects on our U.S. dollar-denominated indebtedness and interest expenses, negatively affecting our results of operations. Notwithstanding the adverse effects on the carrying amounts of our financial liabilities, we do not anticipate any substantial effect on our liquidity as there are few short-term payment obligations under our indebtedness, which we have hedged by continuing to hold a portion of the proceeds from our sale of PT Ventures in U.S. dollars. However, a prolonged deterioration of the value of thereal could adversely affect our ability to meet our payment obligations on our indebtedness when future amortization payments become due. A portion of our capital expenditures and operating leases require us to acquire assets or use third-party assets at prices denominated in or linked to foreign currencies, some of which are financed by liabilities denominated in foreign currencies, principally the U.S. dollar. We generally do not hedge exposures relating to our capital expenditures or operating expenses against risks related to movements of thereal against foreign currencies. To the extent that the value of thereal decreases relative to the U.S. dollar, it becomes more costly for us to purchase these assets or services, which could adversely affect our business and financial performance. Despite the 17.1% devaluationdepreciation of thereal induring 2018, the slow recovery of the Brazilian economy contributed to maintainlimited inflation at controlled standards and allowallowed the Central Bank of Brazil (Banco Central do Brasil), or the Brazilian Central Bank to reduce the SELIC rate (the Brazilian Central Bank’s overnight right)rate) by 0.50%, during 2018, ending the year2018 at 6.5%. As of December 31, 2019, the SELIC rate was 4.5%.

The significant depreciation of thereal subsequent to December 31, 2019 is expected to have effects on our U.S. dollar-denominated capital expenditure and operating lease costs, although we do not anticipate any substantial effects in the short-term as we generally fix the exchange rates applicable to our network equipment orders at the time that these orders are placed and we have hedged our U.S. dollar-denominated operating expenses by continuing to hold a portion of the proceeds from our sale of PT Ventures in U.S. dollars. A prolonged deterioration of the value of thereal could adversely affect our ability to implement our capital expenditure program and increase our operating costs, adversely affect our operating results and overall financial performance.

Appreciation of thereal against the U.S. dollar may lead to a deterioration of the country’s current account and the balance of payments, as well as to a dampening of export-driven growth. Any such appreciation could reduce the competitiveness of Brazilian exports and adversely affect net sales and cash flows from exports. Depreciation of thereal relative to the U.S. dollar could create additional inflationary pressures in Brazil by increasing the price of imported products, which may result in the adoption of deflationary government policies. The sharp depreciation of thereal in relation to the U.S. dollar may generate inflation and governmental measures to fight possible inflationary outbreaks, including the increase in interest rates, which reduces the purchasing power of consumers and raises the cost in the credit market. Any such macroeconomic effects could adversely affect our net operating revenues and our overall financial performance.

If Brazil experiences substantial inflation in the future, our margins and our ability to access foreign financial markets may be reduced. Inflation and government measures to curb inflation may have adverse effects on the Brazilian economy, the Brazilian securities market and our business and results of operations.

In the past, Brazil has experienced extremely high rates of inflation. Inflation, policies adopted to curb inflationary pressures and uncertainties regarding possible future governmental intervention have had and are expected to continue to have significant negative effects on the Brazilian economy generally, and have contributed to economic uncertainty and heightened volatility in the Brazilian capital markets.

According to the Broad Consumer Price Index (Índice Nacional de Preços ao Consumidor Ampliado), or IPCA, published by the Brazilian Institute forof Geography and Statistics (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística), the Brazilian consumer price inflation rates were 6.4% in 2014, 10.7% induring 2015, 6.3% induring 2016, 2.9% in3.0% during 2017, 3.8% during 2018 and 3.7% in 2018.4.3% during 2019. Brazil may experience high levels of inflation in the future and inflationary pressures may lead to the Brazilian government’s intervening in the economy and introducing policies that could harm our business and the price of our common shares, preferred sharesCommon Shares, Preferred Shares and ADSs.

Currently,As of the date of this annual report, fixed broadband and mobile service providers use the General Market Price Index — Internal Availability (Índice Geral de Preços — Disponibilidade Interna), orIGP-DI, to adjust their prices. TheIGP-DI is an inflation index developed by the Fundação Getúlio Vargas, or FGV, a private organization. TheIGP-DI index was 3.8% in 2014, 10.7% induring 2015, 7.2% induring 2016, (0.42)% induring 2017, 7.1% during 2018 and 7.1% in 2018.7.7% during 2019.

Since 2006, rates for fixed-line services have been indexed to the telecommunication services indexTelecommunication Services Index (Índice de Serviços de Telecomunicações), or IST, adjusted by a productivity factor, which is defined by ANATEL Resolution 507/2008. The IST is an index composed of other domestic price indexes (including the IPCA, theIGP-DI and the General Market Price Index (Índice Geral de Preços ao Mercado), orIGP-M, published by FGV, among others) that is intended to reflect the telecommunications industry’s operating costs. As a result, this index serves to reduce potential discrepancies between our industry’s revenue and costs, and thus reduce the apparent adverse effects of inflation on our operations. The productivity factor, pursuant to which ANATEL is authorized to adjust fee rates, is calculated based on a compensation index established by ANATEL to incentivize operational efficiency and to share related gains in earnings from fixed line services with customers through fee rate adjustments. The IST is calculated based on a12-month period average. This may cause increases in our revenues above or below our costs (including salaries), with potentially adverse impacts on our profitability.

If Brazil experiences substantial inflation in the future, our costs may increase and our operating and net margins may decrease. Although ANATEL regulations provide for annual price increases for most of our services in Brazil, such increases are linked to inflation indices, discounted by increases in our productivity. During periods of rapid increases in inflation, the price increases for our services may not be sufficient to cover our additional costs and we may be adversely affected by the lag in time between the incurrence of increased costs and the receipt of revenues resulting from the annual price increases. Inflationary pressures may also curtail our ability to access foreign financial markets and may lead to further government intervention in the economy, including the introduction of government policies that may adversely affect the overall performance of the Brazilian economy.

Fluctuations in interest rates could increase the cost of servicing our debt and negatively affect our overall financial performance.

Our financial expenses are affected by changes in the interest rates that apply to our floating rate debt. As of December 31, 2018,2019, we had, among other consolidated debt obligations, excluding the fair value adjustment to our loansborrowings and financings,financing and debt issuance costs, R$12,25613,087 million of loansborrowings and financingsfinancing that were subject to variable interest rates, including R$8,6409,140 million of loansborrowings and financingsfinancing and debentures that were subject to the Interbank Certificate of Deposit (Certificado(Certificado de DepóDepósito Interbancário)Interbancário), or CDI, rate, an interbank rate, and R$3,6163,947 million of loansborrowings and financingsfinancing that were subject to the Long-Term Interest Rate (Taxa(Taxa de Juros de Longo Prazo)Prazo), or TJLP, a long-term interest rate. As of December 31, 2018,2019, we had, among other consolidated debt obligations, after giving effect to the fair value adjustment to our loansborrowings and financing and debt issuance costs, R$7,5669,148 million of loansborrowings and financingsfinancing that were subject to variable interest rates, including R$3,9504,695 million of loansborrowings and financingsfinancing and debentures that were subject to the CDI rate, and R$3,6163,946 million of loansborrowings and financingsfinancing that were subject to the TJLP rate.TJLP.

The TJLP includes an inflation factor and is determined quarterly by the National Monetary Council (Conselho Monetário Nacional). In particular, the TJLP and the CDI rate have fluctuated significantly in the past in response to the expansion or contraction of the Brazilian economy, inflation, Brazilian government policies and other factors. For example, the CDI increasedrate decreased from 11.57% per annum as of December 31, 2014 to 14.13% per annum as of December 31, 2015, and decreased to 13.63% per annum as of December 31, 2016, 6.89% per annum as of December 31, 2017, and 6.40% per annum as of December 31, 2018.2018 and 4.40% per annum as of December 31, 2019.

The market value of securities issued by Brazilian companies is influenced by the perception of risk in Brazil and other countries, which may have a negative effect on the trading price of Common Shares, Preferred Shares and ADSs and may restrict our access to international capital markets.

Economic and market conditions in other countries and regions, including the United States, the European Union and emerging market countries, may affect to varying degrees the market value of securities of Brazilian issuers. Although economic conditions in these countries and regions may differ significantly from economic conditions in Brazil, investors’ reactions to developments in these other countries may have an adverse effect on the market value of securities of Brazilian issuers, the availability of credit in Brazil and the amount of foreign investment in Brazil. Crises in the European Union, the United States and emerging market countries have at times resulted in significant outflows of funds from Brazil and may diminish investor interest in securities of Brazilian issuers, including our company. This could materially and adversely affect the market price of our securities, and could also make it more difficult for us to access the capital markets and finance our operations in the future on acceptable terms or at all.

Risks Relating to the Common Shares, Preferred Shares and ADSs

Holders of Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs may not receive any dividends or interest on shareholders’ equity.

According to Oi’sby-laws and the Brazilian Corporate Law, Oi must pay its shareholders at least 25% of Oi’s consolidated annual net income as dividends or interest on shareholders’ equity, as calculated and adjusted in accordance with the Brazilian Corporate Law. This adjusted net income may be capitalized, used to absorb losses or otherwise retained as allowed under the Brazilian Corporate Law and Oi’sby-laws and may not be available to be paid as dividends or interest on shareholders’ equity. Holders of Common Shares or Common ADSs may not receive any dividends or interest on shareholders’ equity in any given year due to the dividend preference of Preferred Shares. Additionally, the Brazilian Corporate Law allows a publicly traded company like Oi to suspend the mandatory distribution of dividends in any particular year if Oi’s board of directors informs Oi’s shareholders at the ordinary general shareholders’ meeting that such distributions would be inadvisable in view of Oi’s financial condition or cash availability and subject to approval of the general shareholders’ meeting. In addition, the members of Oi’s fiscal council must issue an opinion with respect to the suspension of the mandatory distribution of dividends and Oi’s board of directors must submit to the CVM the justification for such suspension.

Moreover, under the RJ Plan, Oi and the other RJ Debtors are prohibited from declaring or paying dividends, interest on shareholders’ equity or other forms of return on capital or making any other payment or distribution on or related to their shares (including any payment related to a merger or consolidation) until the sixth anniversary of the date of the Judicial Ratification of the RJ Plan.February 5, 2024. After the sixth anniversary of the date of the Judicial Ratification of the RJ Plan,February 5, 2024, Oi and the other RJ Debtors will be permitted to declare or pay dividends, interest on shareholders’ equity or other forms of return on capital or make any other payment or distribution on or related to their shares (including any payment related to a merger or consolidation) if Oi meets a certain financial ratio, as described under “Item 8. Financial Information—Dividends and Dividend Policy.” There shall not be any restriction to the distribution of dividends under the RJ Plan after the full payment of the Financial Credits (as defined in the RJ Plan). The restrictions of the payment of dividends and other distributions described in this paragraph are subject to certain exceptions, as described under “Item 8. Financial Information—Dividends and Dividend Policy.”

Holders of ADSs are not entitled to attend shareholders’ meetings and may only vote through the depositary.

Under Brazilian law, only shareholders registered as such in Oi’s corporate books may attend Oi’s shareholders’ meetings. All Common Shares and Preferred Shares underlying our ADSs are registered in the name of the depositary. Consequently, a holder of ADSs is not entitled to attend Oi’s shareholders’ meetings. Holders of ADSs may exercise the voting rights with respect to Common Shares and the limited voting rights with respect to Preferred Shares represented by our ADSs only in accordance with the applicable deposit agreement relating to the ADSs. There are practical limitations upon the ability of holders of ADSs to exercise their voting rights due to the additional steps involved in communicating with holders of ADSs. For example, Oi is required to publish a notice of Oi’s shareholders’ meetings in certain newspapers in Brazil. To the extent that holders of Common Shares or Preferred Shares are entitled to vote at a shareholders’ meeting, they will be able to exercise their voting rights by attending the meeting in person or voting by proxy. By contrast, holders of ADSs will receive notice of a shareholders’ meeting by mail from the depositary following Oi’s notification to the depositary of the shareholders’ meeting and Oi’s request that the depositary inform holders of ADSs of the shareholders’ meeting. To exercise their voting rights, holders of ADSs must instruct the depositary on a timely basis. This voting process will take longer for holders of ADSs than for holders of Common Shares or Preferred Shares. If the depositary fails to receive timely voting instructions for all or part of ADSs, the depositary will assume that the holders of those ADSs are instructing it to give a discretionary proxy to a person designated by us to vote their ADSs, except in limited circumstances.

We cannot assure you that holders of ADSs will receive the voting materials in time to ensure that such holders can instruct the depositary to vote Common Shares or Preferred Shares underlying their ADSs. In addition, the depositary and its agents are not responsible for failing to carry out voting instructions of the holders of ADSs or for the manner of carrying out those voting instructions. Accordingly, holders of ADSs may not be able to exercise voting rights, and they will have no recourse if the Common Shares or Preferred Shares underlying their ADSs are not voted as requested.

Holders of Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs in the United States may not be entitled to participate in future preemptive rights offerings of Common Shares or Preferred Shares.

Under Brazilian law, if Oi offers to issue new shares in exchange for cash or assets as part of a capital increase, Oi generally must grant its shareholders the right to purchase a sufficient number of the offered shares to maintain their existing ownership percentage. Rights to purchase shares in these circumstances are known as preemptive rights. Oi may not legally be permitted to allow holders of Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs in the United States to exercise any preemptive rights in any future capital increase unless either (1) Oi files a registration statement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC with respect to that offering of shares, as Oi did for its most recent capital increase, or (2) that offering of shares qualifies for an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act. At the time of any future capital increase, Oi will evaluate the costs and potential liabilities associated with filing a registration statement with the SEC and any other factors that Oi considers important in determining whether to file such a registration statement. Oi is not obligated to file a registration statement in connection with any future capital increase, and Oi cannot assure the holders of Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs in the United States that it will file a registration statement with the SEC to allow them to participate in a preemptive rights offering. As a result, the equity interest of such holders in Oi may be diluted.

If holders of ADSs exchange them for Common Shares or Preferred Shares, they may risk temporarily losing, or being limited in, the ability to remit foreign currency abroad and certain Brazilian tax advantages.

The Brazilian custodian for the common sharesCommon Shares and preferred sharesPreferred Shares underlying our ADSs has obtained an electronic registration number with the Brazilian Central Bank to allow the depositary to remit U.S. dollars abroad. ADS holders benefit from the electronic certificate of foreign capital registration from the Brazilian Central Bank obtained by the custodian for the depositary, which permits it to convert dividends and other distributions with respect to the common sharesCommon Shares or preferred sharesPreferred Shares into U.S. dollars and remit the proceeds of such conversion abroad. If holders of our ADSs decide to exchange them for the underlying common sharesCommon Shares or preferred shares,Preferred Shares, they will be required to appoint a Brazilian financial institution to act as their legal representative who shall be responsible, among other things, for keeping and updating the investors’ certificates of registrations with the Brazilian Central Bank, as provided in CMN Resolution No. 4,373. Investors will only be able to remit U.S. dollars abroad if the relevant new electronic certificate of foreign capital registration in connection with the common sharesCommon Shares or preferred sharesPreferred Shares is previously obtained. If such Investorsinvestors fail to obtain or update the relevant certificates of registration, it may result in additional expenses and may cause delays in receiving distributions. See “Item 10. Additional Information—Exchange Controls.”

Also,In addition, if holders of our ADSs exchange our ADSs for Common Shares or Preferred Shares, generally they may be subject to a less favorable tax treatment on the proceeds from any sale of, our common sharesCommon Shares or preferred shares.Preferred Shares. See “Item 10. Additional Information—Taxation—Brazilian Tax Considerations.”

Holders of ADSs may face difficulties in serving process on or enforcing judgments against us and other persons.

Oi is organizedincorporated as a corporation under the laws of Brazil and substantially all of the members of Oi’s board of directors, Oi’s executive officers and Oi’s independent registered public accountants reside or are based in Brazil. The vast majority of Oi’s assets and those of these other persons are located in Brazil. In addition, all of Oi’s directors and executive officers reside outside the United States and all or a significant portion of the assets of such persons may be located outside the United States. As a result, it may not be possible for holders of ADSs to effect service of process upon us or these other persons within the United States or other jurisdictions outside Brazil upon such persons, or to enforce any judgments obtained in the United States or other jurisdictions outside Brazil against Oi or these other persons. In addition, because substantially all of Oi’s assets and all of Oi’s directors and executive officers reside outside the United States, any judgment obtained in the United States against Oi or any of Oi’s directors or executive officers may not be collectible within the United States. Becausesuch persons judgments of U.S. courts, forincluding judgments predicated upon the civil liabilities based uponliability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws may only be enforced in Brazil if certain conditions are met, holders may face greater difficulties in protecting their interests inor the caselaws of actions by Oi, Oi’s directors or executive officers than would shareholders of a U.S. corporation.such other jurisdictions.

Holders of Common Shares and Preferred Shares will be subject to, and holders of ADSs could be subject to, Brazilian income tax on capital gains from sales of Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs.

According to Article 26 of Brazilian Law No. 10,833/2003, if a holder not deemed to be domiciled in Brazil for Brazilian tax and regulatory purposes, or aNon-Brazilian Holder, disposes of assets located in Brazil, the transaction will be subject to taxation in Brazil, even if such disposition occurs outside Brazil or if such disposition is made to anotherNon-Brazilian Holder. Accordingly, on the disposition of common shares or preferred shares, which are considered assets located in Brazil, theNon-Brazilian Holder will be subject to income tax on the gains assessed, following the rules described under ““Item“Item 10. Additional Information—Taxation—Brazilian Tax Considerations—Taxation of Gains,” regardless of whether the transactions are conducted in Brazil or abroad and with a Brazilian resident or not. A disposition of our ADSs, however, involves the disposal of anon-Brazilian asset, which in principle should not be subject to taxation in Brazil. Nevertheless, in the event that the concept of “assets located in Brazil” is interpreted to include our ADSs, this tax law could result in the imposition of withholding taxes on the disposition of our ADSs made byNon-Brazilian Holders. Due to the fact that, as of the date of this annual report, Article 26 of Brazilian Law No. 10,833/2003 has no judicial guidance as to its application to ADSs, we are unable to predict which interpretation would ultimately prevail in Brazilian courts. See “Item 10. Additional Information—Taxation—Brazilian Tax Considerations —Taxation of Gains.”

We believe Oi believes that it was not a passive foreign investment company (“PFIC”) for ourits taxable year ended December 31, 2018, which could result in adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S. Holders of our Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs.2019.

Oi will be classified as a passive foreign investment company, or PFIC, in any taxable year if either: (1) 50% or more of the fair market value of our gross assets (determined on the basis of a quarterly average) for the taxable year produce passive income or are held for the production of passive income, or (2) 75% or more of our gross income for the taxable year is passive income. As a publicly traded foreign corporation, Oi intends for this purpose to treat the aggregate fair market value of our gross assets as being equal to the aggregate value of our outstanding stock plus the total amount of our liabilities (“market capitalization”) and to treat the excess of the fair market value of our assets over their book value as a nonpassive asset to the extent attributable to our nonpassive income. Based on the market price of the Common Shares and the Preferred Shares and the composition of our assets, we believe Oi believes that it was not a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes for ourits taxable year ended December 31, 2019, although Oi believes that it was a PFIC for the taxable year ended December 31, 2018. Furthermore, unlessNevertheless, because PFIC status is determined annually based on Oi’s income, assets and activities for the value of the Common Shares and the Preferred Shares increases and/or we invest a substantial amount of our cash and other passive assets in assets that produce active income, thereentire taxable year, it is a risknot possible to determine whether Oi will be characterized as a PFIC for ourthe taxable year ending December 31, 2019. The application of the PFIC rules is subject to uncertainty in several respects, and we must make a separate determination2020, or for any subsequent year, until after the close of each taxable year as to whetherthe year. Furthermore, because Oi wasdetermines the value of its gross assets based on the Market Capitalization test, a decline in the value of its Common Shares and Preferred Shares may result in Oi becoming a PFIC. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that Oi will not be considered a PFIC for suchany taxable year. Because we believe

If contrary to Oi’s belief, Oi waswere characterized as a PFIC for ourits taxable year ended December 31, 2018,2019, certain adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences could apply to a U.S. investor who holds Common Shares or Preferred Shares or ADSs with respect to any “excess distribution” received from Oi and any gain from a sale or other disposition of Common Shares or Preferred Shares or ADSs, and U.S. investors also may be subject to additional reporting obligations with respect to Common Shares or Preferred Shares or ADSs. We doIn such case, Oi does not intend to provide the information necessary for a U.S. investor to make a qualified electing fund election with respect to the Common Shares or Preferred Shares or ADSs. See “Item 10. Additional Information—Taxation – U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations – Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules.”

If a United States person is treated as owning at least 10% of Oi’s shares, such holder may be subject to adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences.

If a United States person is treated as owning (directly, indirectly or constructively) at least 10% of the value or voting power of Oi’s shares, such person may be treated as a “United States shareholder” with respect to each “controlled foreign corporation” in our group (if any). If United States shareholders own (or are treated as owning) more than 50% of the value or voting power of Oi’s shares, Oi would (and ournon-U.S. subsidiaries could) be treated as controlled foreign corporations. In addition, if our group includes one or more U.S. subsidiaries, certain of ournon-U.S. subsidiaries could be treated as controlled foreign corporations (regardless of whether we are treated as a controlled foreign corporation). A United States shareholder of a controlled foreign corporation may be required to report annually and include in its U.S. taxable income its pro rata share of “Subpart F income,” “global intangiblelow-taxed income” and investments in U.S. property by controlled foreign corporations, regardless of whether we make any distributions. An individual that is a United States shareholder with respect to a controlled foreign corporation generally would not be allowed certain tax deductions or foreign tax credits that would be allowed to a United States shareholder that is a U.S. corporation. Failure to comply with these reporting obligations may subject you to significant monetary penalties and may prevent the statute of limitations with respect to your U.S. federal income tax return for the year for which reporting was due from starting. We cannot provide any assurances that we will assist investors in determining whether any of ournon-U.S. subsidiaries are treated as a controlled foreign corporation or whether such investor is treated as a United States shareholder with respect to any of such controlled foreign corporations or furnish to any United States shareholders information that may be necessary to comply with the aforementioned reporting and tax paying obligations. Certain of our shareholders may be United States shareholders. The determination of controlled foreign corporation status is complex and includes attribution rules, the application of which is not entirely certain. A United States investor should consult its advisors regarding the potential application of these rules to an investment in Oi’s common shares, preferred sharesCommon Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs.

Trading onover-the-counter markets may be volatile and sporadic, which could depress the market price of the Preferred ADSADSs and make it difficult for holders to resell Oi’s Preferred ADSs.

On June 21, 2016, the Preferred ADSs were delisted from the New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE. On June 23, 2016, the OTC Markets Group, Inc. began publishing quotations for the Preferred ADS in the “pink sheets” under the trading symbol OIBRQ. Trading in stock quoted on over the counter markets is often thin, volatile, and characterized by wide fluctuations in trading prices due to many factors that may have little to do with our operations or business prospects. This volatility could depress the market price of the Preferred ADSs for reasons unrelated to operating performance. Moreover, the over the counter markets are not a stock exchange, and trading of securities on the over the counter markets is often more sporadic than the trading of securities listed on other stock exchanges such as the NYSE, the NASDAQ Stock Market or the American Stock Exchange. Accordingly, holders of Preferred ADSs may have difficulty reselling such securities.

 

ITEM 4.

INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY

Overview

We are one of the principal integrated telecommunications service providers in Brazil with approximately 57.153.4 million revenue generating units, or RGUs, as of December 31, 2018.2019. We operate throughout Brazil and offer a range of integrated telecommunications services that include Residential Services, Personal Mobility Services and B2B Services.

Our Residential Services business includes local and long-distance fixed-line voice services, broadband services andPay-TV services provided to residential customers in our fixed-line concession service areas, comprising the entire territory of Brazil other than the State of São Paulo. We are the largest fixed-line telecommunications company in Brazil in terms of total number of lines in service as of December 31, 20182019 based on our 11.810.3 million fixed lines in service as of December 31, 2018,2019, with a market share of 51.1%48.4% of the total fixed lines in service in our service areas as of that date. We own the largest fiber optic network in Brazil, with more than 360,000376,000 kilometers of installed fiber optic cable, distributed throughout Brazil. We focus on increasing the revenue generated by this customer base by aggressively promoting convergent services (double-play, triple-play and quadruple-play packages) including our mobile, broadband andPay-TV services. We offer a variety of high-speed broadband services. As of December 31, 2018,2019, we had 4.94.2 million asymmetric digital subscriber line, or ADSL, subscribers, representing 59.0%60.0% of our residential fixed line customers as of that date. We offerPay-TV services under ourOi TV brand. We deliverPay-TV services throughout our residential service areas using DTH satellite technology. As of December 31, 2018,2019, we had 1.61.5 million residentialPay-TV subscribers, representing 19.2%20.7% of our residential fixed line customers as of that date.

Our Personal Mobility Services business offers mobile telecommunications services throughout Brazil. Our mobile network covers areas in which approximately 94.0%94% of the Brazilian population lives and works. In addition, we provide network usage (interconnection) services. Based on our 37.736.8 million mobile subscribers as of December 31, 2018,2019, we had a 16.4%16.2% market share of the Brazilian mobile telecommunications market as of that date.

Our B2B Services business provides voice, broadband,Pay-TV, data transmission and other telecommunications services to small and medium sized enterprises, or SMEs, corporation and governmental agencies throughout Brazil. We also provide wholesale interconnection, network usage (interconnection) services and traffic transportation services to other telecommunications providers.

Our principal executive office is located at Rua Humberto de Campos No. 425, 8th floor–Leblon,22430-190 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, and our telephone number at this address is(55-21) 3131-2918.

Our Recent History and Development

Our Judicial Reorganization Proceedings

In June 2016, after considering the challenges arising from our economic and financial situation in connection with the maturity schedule of our financial debts, the threats to our cash flows represented by imminent attachments or freezing of assets in judicial lawsuits, and the urgent need to adopt measures that protect our company, we concluded that filing of a request for judicial reorganization (recuperação judicial) in Brazil would be the most appropriate course of action (1) to preserve the continuity of our offering of quality services to our customers, within the rules and commitments undertaken with ANATEL, (2) to preserve the value of our company, (3) to maintain the continuity of our operations and corporate activities in an organized manner that protects the interests of our company, customers, shareholders and other stakeholders, and (4) to protect our cash and cash equivalents.

On June 20, 2016, Oi, together with the other RJ Debtors, filed a joint voluntary petition for judicial reorganization pursuant to the Brazilian Bankruptcy Law with the RJ Court, pursuant to an urgent measure approved by our board of directors. Following a protracted period of negotiation with various creditor constituencies, on December 12, 2017, the RJ Debtors filed the RJ Plan with the RJ Court.

Approval of RJ Plan at GCM and Confirmation of Judicial Reorganization Plan by RJ Court

On December 19 and 20, 2017, thea GCM to consider approving the RJ Plan was held following the confirmation that the required quorum of creditors of each of classes I, II, III, and IV was in attendance. As part of the RJ Plan, we negotiated the terms of a commitment agreement, which we refer to as the Commitment Agreement, with members of a diverse ad hoc group of holders of the bonds issued by Oi, Oi Coop and PTIF, which we refer to as the Ad Hoc Group, the International Bondholder Committee, a group of creditors in the Netherlands, which we refer to as the IBC, and certain other unaffiliated bondholders under whichbondholders. Under the terms of the Commitment Agreement, such bondholders, which we refer to as the Backstop Investors, agreed to backstop the Rights Offer,our preemptive offering of Common Shares, subject to the terms and conditions of the Commitment Agreement. TheThis GCM concluded on December 20, 2017 following the approval of the RJ Plan by a significant majority of creditors of each class present at thethis GCM, reflecting amendments to the RJ Plan presented at thethis GCM as negotiated during the course of thethis GCM.

On January 8, 2018, the RJ Court entered the Brazilian Confirmation Order, ratifying and confirming the RJ Plan, according to its terms, but modifying certain provisions of the RJ Plan. The Brazilian Confirmation Order was published in the Official Gazette of the State of Rio de Janeiro on February 5, 2018, the Brazilian Confirmation Date.

The Brazilian Confirmation Order, according to its terms, is currently binding on all parties. By operation of the RJ Plan and the Brazilian Confirmation Order the unsecured claims against the RJ Debtors have been novated and discharged under Brazilian law and holders of such claims have receivedwill receive the recoveries set forth in the RJ Plan in exchange for their claims in accordance with the terms and conditions of the RJ Plan.

As ofDuring 2018, the deadline to file interlocutory appeals, 27 interlocutory appeals had been filed against the Brazilian Confirmation Order. Although subject to these pending interlocutory appeals, the Brazilian Confirmation Order has not been stayed, fully or partially, and therefore remains in full force and effect, according to its terms. As of the date of this annual report, the term to file an appeal against the Brazilian Confirmation Order has ended for all parties. Following the resolution of these interlocutory appeals, including eventual appeals to the Brazilian Superior and Supreme Courts, the Brazilian Confirmation Order will become final and binding on all parties under Brazilian law.

Recognition Proceedings in the United States

On June 22, 2016, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court entered an order granting the provisional relief requested by the Chapter 15 Debtors in their cases that were filed on June 21, 2016 under Chapter 15 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. On July 21, 2016, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court held a hearing with respect to the Chapter 15 Debtors petition for recognitionrestructuring of the RJ Proceedings as a main foreign proceedings with regard to each of the Chapter 15 Debtors and did not receive any objections to such petition. On July 22, 2016, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court granted the U.S. Recognition Order.

On April 17, 2018, the foreign representative for the Chapter 15 Debtors filed a motionDebtor’s financial debt in accordance with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court seeking an order of that court granting, among other things, full forceapplicable terms and effect to the RJ Plan and the Brazilian Confirmation Order in the United States. On June 14, 2018, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court granted the requested order. As a result, the claims with respect to the Defaulted Bonds that were governed by New York law have been novated and discharged under New York law and the holders of these Defaulted Bonds were entitled only to receive the recoveryconditions set forth in the RJ Plan in exchange forwas concluded.

Extension of the claims represented by these Defaulted Bonds.Judicial Reorganization Proceedings

For more information regarding the proceedings in the United States relating toThe Brazilian Bankruptcy Law provides that the RJ Proceedings see “Item 8. Financial Information—Legal Proceedings—Legal Proceedings Relating to Our Financial Restructuring—Recognition Proceedings inand the United States.”

Recognitionjudicial supervision of the RJ PlanDebtors may be terminated on the second anniversary of the Brazilian Confirmation Date if the RJ Court determines that all obligations provided for in the United KingdomRJ Plan have been satisfied based on the analysis of compliance with the RJ Plan.

On June 23, 2016,December 6, 2019, we filed a petition with the HighRJ Court of Justice of England and Wales grantedrequesting that the U.K. Recognition Orders.

As a resultjudicial supervision of the homologationRJ Debtors not be terminated on February 5, 2020, the second anniversary of the PTIF CompositionBrazilian Confirmation Date, in order to allow us to continue to execute the RJ Plan described below under “—Restructuring of Our Dutch Finance Subsidiaries”and remain focused on June 20, 2018,our strategic transformation. Notwithstanding the PTIF Composition Plan is automatically recognized by each EU member stateconclusion of the includingrestructuring of the UK, underRJ Debtor’s financial debt in accordance with the European Insolvency Regulation (2015/848). As a result, the claims against PTIF with respect to the Defaulted Bonds that were governed by English law have been novatedapplicable terms and discharged as a matter of English law and the holders of these Defaulted Bonds are entitled only to receive the recoveryconditions set forth in the RJ Plan, in exchange for the claims represented by these Defaulted Bonds.

For more information regarding the proceedings in the United Kingdom relatingwe presented to the RJ Proceedings, see “Item 8. Financial Information—Legal Proceedings—Legal Proceedings RelatingCourt circumstances related to Our Financial Restructuring—Recognition Proceedings in the United Kingdom.”

Restructuringcomplexity inherent to the magnitude of Dutch Finance Subsidiaries

Although the RJ Proceedings have been recognizedand the ongoing reforms in the United States, England and Wales and Portugal, the laws of The Netherlands do not provide for the recognition oflegal-regulatory environment, which we believe require additional measures yet to be implemented under the RJ Proceedings. Two

On February 27, 2020, we filed a petition with the RJ Court requesting that we be permitted to submit to our creditors for their consideration and deliberation at a new general creditors’ meeting a proposed amendment to the RJ Plan designed to achieve greater operational and financial flexibility for our company to continue with investments and the fulfillment of our strategic plan. At the new general creditors’ meeting, only creditors of the RJ Debtors Oi Coopthat held credits and PTIF, are organized underhad voting rights at the laws of The Netherlands. As a result, a group of holders of sometime of the Defaulted Bonds issued by Oi Cooporiginal GCM and PTIF brought proceedings against thesewho continued to hold an interest in the debt obligations or equity securities of the RJ Debtors in The Netherlands.

On April 10, 2018, PTIF deposited a draft of the PTIF Composition Plan with the Dutch District Court and Oi Coop deposited a draft of the Oi Coop Composition Plan with the Dutch District Court. The PTIF Composition Plan and the Oi Coop Composition Plan each provide for the restructuring of the claims against PTIF and Oi Coop on substantially the same terms and conditions as the RJ Plan.

On May 17, 2018, meetings of each series of bonds issued by PTIF were held at which the bondholders voted in favor of extraordinary resolutions providing for: (1) the release Oi’s guarantee for each of the relevant series of Defaulted Bonds, (2) the authorization of the trustee of each outstanding series of Defaulted Bonds issued by PTIFFebruary 27, 2020 will be entitled to act as a sole creditor of such Defaulted Bonds, submit a claim on behalf of the holders of such Defaulted Bonds to the PTIF Trustee in relation to the PTIF bankruptcy and vote in favor of the PTIF Composition Plan, and (3) authorize the trustee of each outstanding series of Defaulted Bonds issued by PTIF to request the PTIF Trustee in respect of its vote on behalf of PTIF, to vote in favor of the Oi Coop Composition Plan.

On June 1, 2018, at a meeting of the creditors of PTIF in the Netherlands, the creditors of PTIF approved the PTIF Composition Plan and directed the PTIF Trustee to vote PTIF’s claims in Oi Coop in favor of the Oi Coop Composition Plan. Also on June 1, 2018, at a meeting of the creditors of Oi Coop, the creditors of Oi Coop approved the Oi Coop Composition Plan.

vote.

On June 11, 2018,March 6, 2020, the Dutch DistrictRJ Court confirmedissued a decision granting our request to hold a new general creditors’ meeting to deliberate on a proposed amendment to the PTIF CompositionRJ Plan. The RJ Court required that:

the RJ Debtors must submit the proposed amendment to the RJ Plan andto the Oi Coop Composition Plan at a homologation hearing. The homologation was subjectRJ Court on or prior to an eight day appeal period, which expired on June 19, 2018. AsSeptember 8, 2020; and

the new general creditors’ meeting organized by the Judicial Administrator must take place within 60 days from the date of that date, no appeals had been filed. As a result, the PTIF Composition Plan and the Oi Coop Composition Plan are effective as a matter of Dutch law, the bankruptcies of PTIF and Oi Coop have terminated and the PTIF Composition Plan and the Oi Coop Composition Plan have full force and effect in each member statesubmission of the European Union.

Recognition Orders in Portugal

On November 14, 2016, Oi and Telemar requested the Third Lisbon Commercial Court, or the Portuguese Court,proposed amendment to recognize the RJ Proceedings in relationPlan to Oi and Telemar in Portugal under the Portuguese Insolvency and Corporate Recovery Code. On July 11, 2017, Oi Mobile requested the Portuguese Court to recognize the RJ Proceedings in relation to Oi Mobile in Portugal under the Portuguese Insolvency and Corporate Recovery Code. The Portuguese Court granted recognition ofby the RJ Proceedings in Portugal in relationDebtors.

We intend to Oi and Telemar on March 1, 2017 and Oi Mobile on August 4, 2017.

On May 9, 2018, Oi, Telemar and Oi Mobile, along with Copart 4 and Copart 5, filed a request for recognition ofseek to amend the RJ Plan in Portugal with respectorder to these entities. On August 1, 2018,facilitate asset sales contemplated by our strategic plan, including the Portuguese Court rejected this decision onpotential sale of our mobile business and the grounds thatproposed sales of othernon-core assets. We continue to discuss the RJ Plan was still subject to appeal in Brazil. Oi appealed this decision, and on October 26, 2018, the Lisbon Court of Appeal reversed the decisionterms of the Portuguese Court, recognized in Portugal the decision rendered by the RJ Court on January 8, 2018 and published on February 5, 2018, which confirmed the RJ Plan, and ordered the publication of the Brazilian decision in Portugal.

Implementation of the Financial Settlement of the Judicial Reorganization Plan

Settlement of Class I Claims

As a result of the commencement of the RJ Proceedings on June 20, 2016, (1) all outstanding labor claims against the RJ Debtors as of that date and (2) our obligations to fund certainproposed amendment with various constituencies of our post-retirement defined benefit plans as of that date became subject to compromise under our RJ Proceedings. As of December 31, 2017, the aggregate amount of the contingencies for labor claims recognized by the RJ Court was R$899 million,company and the aggregate amount of our unfunded obligations under our post-retirement defined benefit plans recognized by the RJ Court was R$560 million, all of which related to claims of FATL. For more information regarding these labor contingencies, see notes 19 and 29 to our audited consolidated financial statements. For more information regarding our unfunded obligations under our post-retirement defined benefit plans, see note 23 to our audited consolidated financial statements.

Under the RJ Plan, labor claims were classified as Class I claims. Under the RJ Plan, generally all labor claims were paid in five equal monthly installments, beginning on August 5, 2018, thesix-month anniversary of the Brazilian Confirmation Date. Labor claims not yet adjudicated will be paid in five equal monthly installments, beginning six months after a final,non-appealable ruling of the relevant court hearing a labor claim.

Labor claims for which a judicial deposit was posted by any of the RJ Debtors was paid through the immediate disbursement of the amount deposited in court and, in the event that the related judicial deposit was lower than the labor claim recognized by the RJ Court, the judicial deposit was used to pay part of the labor claim and the outstanding balance of the labor claim was paid in five equal monthly installments, beginning on August 5, 2018, thesix-month anniversary of the Brazilian Confirmation Date. In the event that the related judicial deposit was greater than the amount of the labor claim recognized by the RJ Court, the RJ Debtors were entitled to withdraw the difference from the judicial deposit.

Labor claims for whichcan provide no judicial deposit was posted by any of the RJ Debtors will be paid through judicial deposits that have been attached to the court records of the related case.

Under the RJ Plan, our obligations to fund our post-retirement defined benefit plans were classified as Class I claims. Claims due to FATL are payable in six annual, equal installments, beginning on February 5, 2023, the fifth anniversary of the Brazilian Confirmation Date and the amount due bears interest at the rate of the National Consumer Price Index (INPC) plus 5.5% per annum from February 5, 2018. Interest will be capitalized to increase the principal balance of these claims on an annual basis until February 5, 2018, and will be paid annually in cash thereafter through the final maturity.

Settlement of Class II Claims

Under the RJ Plan, the claim of BNDES under our credit facilities with BNDES was classified as a Class II claim. As of December 31, 2017, the aggregate amount of the claims recognized by the RJ Court under our credit facilities with BNDES was R$3,326 million. Under the RJ Plan, BNDES is entitled to receive payment of 100% of the principal amount of its recognized claims inreais, adjusted by the interest/inflation adjustment rate. The principal amount of these claims will be paid in 108 monthly installments beginning in March 2024, in the amount of 0.33% of the outstanding principal for the first 60 monthly installments, 1.67% of the outstanding principal for the next 47 monthly installments and the remainder at maturity on February 15, 2033. The principal amount of these claims will accrue interest at the TJLP rate plus 2.946372%per annum from February 5, 2018. Interest will be capitalized to increase the principal balance under these claims on an annual basis until February 5, 2022, and will be paid monthly in cash thereafter through the final maturity.

Settlement of Class III Claims – Defaulted Bonds

Under the RJ Plan, the claims of holders of the Defaulted Bonds were classified as Class III claims. As of December 31, 2017, the aggregate amount of the claims recognized by the RJ Court of holders of our Defaulted Bonds was R$32,314 million. Under the RJ Plan, each holder of Defaulted Bonds was entitled to receive the Qualified Recovery (as described below), theNon-Qualified Recovery (as described below) or the Default Recovery (as described under “—Settlement of Class III and Class IV Claims – Default Recovery”) in respect of the claims evidenced by the Defaulted Bonds such holder beneficially held. We refer to the amount of these claims as Bondholder Credits.

Under the RJ Plan, holders of Defaulted Bonds were entitled to make an electionassurances with respect to the formspecific terms of the recoveryproposed amendment that they were entitled to receive based on whether such holder had individualized its claim before the RJ Court and the aggregate amount of Bondholder Credits (consisting of the U.S. dollar equivalent of the principal amount of such Defaulted Bonds and the accrued interest until June 20, 2016, the date of the commencement of the RJ Proceedings) represented by such holder’s Defaulted Bonds. Holders that had individualized their claims were entitled to elect (1) the Qualified Recovery if the aggregate amount of their Bondholder Credits was US$750,000 or more, or (2) theNon-Qualified Recovery if the aggregate amount of their Bondholder Credits was less than US$750,000. Holders that had not individualized their claims or did not elect the Qualified Recovery orNon-Qualified Recovery were entitled to the Default Recovery. The period to make these elections commenced on February 6, 2018 and expired on March 8, 2018.

Qualified Recovery

Under the RJ Plan, the Qualified Recovery consisted of New Notes, newly issued Common ADSs, Common ADSs previously held by PTIF and ADWs to subscribe to newly issued Common ADSs in amounts determined based on the amount of Bondholder Credits evidenced by the Defaulted Bonds of each series of Defaulted Bonds held by a holder.

Under Brazilian law, prior to issuing the Common Shares underlying the newly issued Common ADSs or the Warrants underlying the newly issued ADWs to holders of Defaulted Bonds, Oi was required to conduct a preemptive offer of those Common Shares and Warrants to all holders of its Common Shares and Preferred Shares. Holders of Common ADSs and Preferred ADSs were not entitled to participate in that preemptive offer.

Holders of preemptive rights were entitled to subscribe to Common Shares and the associated Warrants during a subscription period commencing on June 15, 2018 and ending on July 16, 2018 at a subscription price of R$7.00 per Common Share. Holders of Common Shares and Preferred Shares subscribed for 68,263 Common Shares and 5,197 Warrants in the preemptive offer. The cash proceeds of the preemptive offer were required to be made available to holders of Defaulted Bonds in lieu of the subscribed Common Shares and Warrants.

Under the RJ Plan, the Qualified Recovery with respect to each US$1,000 of Bondholder Credits consisted of approximately:

US$195.61 aggregate principal amount of New Notes;

38.57 Common ADSs representing 192.83 Common Shares;

2.75 ADWs; and

US$0.01 in cash.

The New Notes are senior unsecured obligations of Oi denominated in U.S. dollars that mature in July 2025, with the principal amount to be paid in full at maturity. The New Notes are guaranteed, jointly and severally, by each of Telemar, Oi Mobile, Oi Coop, and PTIF. The New Notes accrue interest from the Brazilian Confirmation Date. Interest on the New Notes will accrue:

from the Brazilian Confirmation Date until February 2019, which is the first interest payment date, until August 2021, the applicable rate will be defined at the sole discretion of Oi to be either (i) a fixed rate of 10.0% per annum payable in cash on a semi-annual basis, or (ii) a fixed rate of 12.0% per annum, of which 8.0% shall be payable in cash and 4.0% shall be payable by either increasing the principal amount of the outstanding New Notes or by issuingpaid-in-kind notes, at the sole discretion of Oi, in each case, on a semi-annual basis; and

thereafter, at a fixed rate of 10.0% per annum payable in cash on a semi-annual basis.

Each ADW represented five Warrants. Each Warrant entitled its holder to subscribe for one Common Share at an exercise price of the equivalent inreais of US$0.01 per Common Share. Each ADW was exercisable only for Common ADSs. Each ADW and each Warrant became exercisable, subject to the terms and conditions thereof, for a period of 92 days commencing on October 3, 2018.

Non-Qualified Recovery

Under the RJ Plan, theNon-Qualified Recovery with respect to each US$1,000 of Bondholder Credits consisted of a participation interest in a principal amount of US$500 under a credit agreement that was entered into between Oi as borrower, the other RJ Debtors as guarantors, and an administrative agent, which we refer to as theNon-Qualified Credit Agreement.

Obligations under theNon-Qualified Credit Agreement are senior unsecured obligations of Oi. Obligations under theNon-Qualified Credit Agreement are guaranteed, jointly and severally, by each Telemar, Oi Mobile, Oi Coop, and PTIF. Principal under theNon-Qualified Credit Agreement will be paid in 12 semi-annual installments beginning in August 2024 in the amount of 4% of the outstanding principal for the first six semi-annual installments, 12.66% of the outstanding principal for the next five semi-annual installments and the remainder at maturity on February 15, 2030. TheNon-Qualified Credit Agreement will accrue interest at the rate of 6% per annum from February 5, 2018. Interest will be capitalized to increase the principal balance under theNon-Qualified Credit Agreement on an annual basis until February 2023, and will be paid together with principal beginning in August 2024.

Settlement Procedures

Following the entry of the order of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court granting full force and effectpresented to the RJ Plan, we commenced settlement procedures in order to permit holders of Defaulted Bonds that had validly elected to receive the Qualified Recovery and theNon-Qualified Recovery to surrender their Defaulted Bonds and receive these recoveries. The settlement of the Qualified Recovery and theNon-Qualified Recovery took place on July 27, 2018. In connection with the settlement of the Qualified Recovery, we issued (1) US$1,653.6 million principal amount of New Notes, (2) 302,846,268 new Common ADSs (representing 1,514,231,340 newly issued Common Shares), (3) 23,250,281 Common ADSs previously held by PTIF (representing 116,251,405 Common Shares), and (4) 23,295,054 ADWs representing the right to subscribe for 23,295,054 newly issued Common ADSs (representing 116,475,270 Common Shares). In connection with the settlement of theNon-Qualified Recovery, holders of Defaulted Bonds received participation interests in theNon-Qualified Credit Agreement in an aggregate amount of US$79.6 million.

Settlement of Class III Claims – Export Credit Agreements

Under the RJ Plan, the claims of lenders under our export credit facility agreements were classified as Class III claims. As of December 31, 2017, the aggregate amount of the claims recognized by the RJ Court of lenders under our export credit facility agreements was R$5,460 million.

Under the RJ Plan, each of the lenders under these export credit facility agreements will receive payment of the amount of their recognized claims under the terms of four new export credit facilities that we entered into with these lenders during June and July 2018. Telemar is the borrower under three facility agreements dated June 21, 2018, July 17, 2018 and July 26, 2018, and Oi and Oi Mobile have guaranteed Telemar’s obligations thereunder. Oi is the borrower under one facility agreement dated July 17, 2018, and Oi Mobile and Telemar have guaranteed Oi’s obligations thereunder.

Under these new export credit facilities, the principal amount of the loans will be paid in U.S. dollars in 24 semi-annual installments beginning in August 2023, in the amount of 2.0% of the outstanding principal for the first 10 semi-annual installments, 5.7% of the outstanding principal for the next 13 semi-annual installments and the remainder at maturity on February 25, 2035. The outstanding principal amount under these new export credit facilities will accrue interest at the rate of 1.75% per annum from February 5, 2018. Interest will be capitalized to increase the outstanding principal on an annual basis until February 2023, and will be paid semi-annually in cash from August 2023 through the final maturity.

Settlement of Class III Claims – Debentures

Under the RJ Plan, the claims of holders of our debentures were classified as Class III claims. As of December 31, 2017, the aggregate amount of the claims recognized by the RJ Court of holders of our debentures was R$4,119 million.

Under the RJ Plan, each holder of beneficial interests in our debentures received new debentures, in the form of either the 12th issuance of simple, unsecured,non-convertible debentures of Oi or the 6th issuance, simple, unsecured,non-convertible debentures of Telemar, both denominated inreais in an aggregate principal amount equal to the principal of the recognized claims surrendered by the holders of beneficial interests in our debentures. These new debentures were issued on February 5, 2018 and subscribed on July 30, 2018. Oi’s obligations under the 12th issuance of simple, unsecured,non-convertible debentures are guaranteed, jointly and severally, by each of Telemar, Oi Mobile, Oi Coop and PTIF. Telemar’s obligations under 6th issuance, simple, unsecured,non-convertible debentures are guaranteed, jointly and severally, by each of Oi, Telemar, Oi Mobile, Oi Coop and PTIF.

The principal amount of the new debentures will be paid inreais in 24 semi-annual installments beginning in August 2023, in the amount of 2.0% of the outstanding principal for the first 10 semi-annual installments, 5.7% of the outstanding principal for the next 13 semi-annual installments and the remainder at maturity on February 25, 2035. The principal amount of these debentures will accrue interest at the rate of 80% of the CDI rate from February 5, 2018. Interest will be capitalized to increase the principal balance under these debentures on an annual basis until February 2023, and will be paid semi-annually in cash from August 2023 through the final maturity.

Settlement of Class III Claims – Unsecured Lines of Credit and Real Estate Securitization Transactions

Under the RJ Plan, the claims (1) of the lender under our unsecured line of credit, and (2) under our obligations to make the payments under leases of certain property by Oi and Telemar from Copart 4 and Copart 5 that had been assigned to support CRIs backed by these receivables, were classified as Class III claims. As of December 31, 2017, the aggregate amount of the claims recognized by the RJ Court of the lender under our unsecured line of credit was R$2,525 million, and the claims recognized by the RJ Court under the CRIs was R$1,519 million.

Under the RJ Plan, the lender under our unsecured line of credit and each of the creditors under the CRIs will receive payment from Oi of 100% of the amount of its recognized claims, which will be paid inreais in 24 semi-annual installments beginning in August 2023, in the amount of 2.0% of the principal amount for the first 10 semi-annual installments, 5.7% of the principal amount for the next 13 semi-annual installments and the remainder at maturity on February 25, 2035. The principal amount will accrue interest at the rate of 80% of the CDI rate from February 5, 2018. Interest will be capitalized to increase the principal amount on an annual basis until February 2023, and will be paid semi-annually in cash from August 2023 through the final maturity. These obligations of Oi are guaranteed, jointly and severally, by each of Telemar, Oi Mobile, Oi Coop and PTIF.

Settlement of Class III Claims – ANATEL

As a result of the commencement of the RJ Proceedings on June 20, 2016, all outstandingnon-tax claims of ANATEL against the RJ Debtors as of that date became subject to compromise under our RJ Proceedings. As of December 31, 2017, the aggregate amount of the contingencies for claims of ANATEL recognized by the RJ Court was R$9,334 million. For more information regarding these claims, see note 29 to our audited consolidated financial statements.

Under the RJ Plan, claims of ANATEL were classified as Class III claims. Under the RJ Plan, liquidated claims of ANATEL outstanding as of June 20, 2016 have been novated and in calculating the recovery of ANATEL under these claims the amounts of all accrued interest included in these claims was reduced by 50% and the amounts of all late charges included in these claims was reduced by 25%. The remaining amount of these claims will be settled in 240 monthly installments, beginning on June 30, 2018, in the amount of 0.160% of the outstanding claims for the first 60 monthly installments, 0.330% of the outstanding claims for the next 60 monthly installments, 0.500% of the outstanding claims for the next 60 monthly installments, 0.660% of the outstanding claims for the next 59 monthly installments, and the remainder at maturity on June 30, 2038. Beginning on July 31, 2018, the amounts of each monthly installment have been be adjusted by the SELIC variation. Payments of monthly installments will be made through the application of judicial deposits related to these claims until the balance of these judicial deposits has been exhausted and thereafter will be payable in cash inreais.

Under the RJ Plan,non-liquidated claims of ANATEL outstanding as of June 20, 2016 have been novated and ANATEL is entitled to the Default Recovery with respect to these claims.

In the event that a legal rule is adopted in Brazil that regulates an alternative manner for the settlement of the claims of ANATEL outstanding as of June 20, 2016, the RJ Debtors may adopt the new regime, observing the terms and conditions set forth in Oi’sby-laws.

Notwithstanding the above, ANATEL has challenged the treatment of its outstanding claims for fines, interest and penalties in the RJ Proceedings. For more information, see “Item 8. Financial Information—Legal Proceedings—Legal Proceedings Relating to Our Financial Restructuring—ANATEL Proceedings.”

Settlement of Class III and Class IV Claims – Trade Creditors

As a result of the commencement of the RJ Proceedings on June 20, 2016, all outstanding trade payables of the RJ Debtors as of that date became subject to compromise under our RJ Proceedings. As of December 31, 2017, the aggregate amount of the claims of our trade creditors recognized by the RJ Court was R$2,139 million.

Under the RJ Plan, the claims of our trade creditors were classified as Class III or Class IV claims. Under the RJ Plan, each of these trade creditors were entitled to make an election of the form of their recovery during an election period that commenced on February 6, 2018 and ended on February 26, 2018.

Trade creditors that, under the RJ Plan, continued to supply goods and/or services to the RJ Debtors without any unreasonable change in the terms and conditions and that did not have anyon-going litigation against any of the RJ Debtors, other than litigation related to the RJ Proceedings, were deemed to be “Strategic Supplier Creditors” under the RJ Plan. Strategic Supplier Creditors with claims of R$150,000 or less (or the equivalent in other currencies), other than claims arising from loans or other funding provided to Oi Coop, were entitled to elect to receive 100% of their claims in cash within 20 business days after the end of the election period. Strategic Supplier Creditors with claims of more than R$150,000 (or the equivalent in other currencies), other than claims arising from loans or other funding provided to Oi Coop, were entitled to elect to receive R$150,000 (or the equivalent in other currencies) in cash within 20 business days after the end of the election period and 90% of their remaining claims in cash in four equal annual installments, plus interest on the amount of their claims at the rate of TR plus 0.5% per annum for claims denominated inreais, and at the rate of 0.5% per annum for claims denominated in U.S. dollars or euros.

Trade creditors that were not deemed to be “Strategic Supplier Creditors” under the RJ Plan were entitled to elect to:

receive the entire amount of their claim in cash in a single installment if the aggregate amount of their claims was less than or equal to R$1,000;

receive R$1,000 in cash in a single installment with respect to the entire amount of their claim if the aggregate amount of their claims was more than R$1,000; or

receive the entire amount of their claim under terms similar to (1) those described under “—Settlement of Class III Claims – Unsecured Lines of Credit and Real Estate Securitization Transactions—Unsecured Lines of Credit” if their claims were denominated inreais, or (2) those described under “—Settlement of Class III Claims – Export Credit Agreements” if their claims were denominated in a currency other thanreais.

Trade creditors that did not elect one of these recovery options are entitled to the Default Recovery.

Settlement of Class III and Class IV Claims – Civil Contingencies

As a result of the commencement of the RJ Proceedings on June 20, 2016, all outstanding unsecured civil claims against the RJ Debtors as of that date became subject to compromise under our RJ Proceedings. As of December 31, 2017, the aggregate amount of the contingencies for civil claims (other than claims of ANATEL and other regulatory agencies) recognized by the RJ Court was R$2,929 million. For more information regarding these civil contingencies, see note 29 to our audited consolidated financial statements.

Under the RJ Plan, unsecured civil claims against the RJ Debtors were classified as Class III and IV claims. Under the RJ Plan, if judicial deposits have been made with respect to adjudicated civil claims, holders of these civil claims that expressly agreed with the amounts of the civil claims acknowledged by the RJ Debtors, including those recognized by the RJ Court, and waived the right to offer, propose, or proceed with credit actions, qualifications, divergences, objections, or any other measure (including appeals) which aim at increasing the amounts of their civil claims, were paid, subject to the reduction of the amount of any civil claim classified as a Class III claim as described below, through the application of judicial deposits related to these civil claims until the balance of the relevant judicial deposits was exhausted. Any amount of a civil claim remaining unpaid after the application of the related judicial deposit entitled the holder to the Default Recovery with respect to the balance of that civil claim. In the event that the related judicial deposit was greater than the amount that the holder of a civil claim was entitled to withdraw, the RJ Debtors were be entitled to withdraw the difference from the judicial deposit.

The amount of the claim of a holder of civil claims (other than claims of ANATEL and other regulatory agencies) that have been classified as Class III claims were reduced based on the amount of such civil claims as follows:

Civil claims of more than R$1,000 and equal to or less than R$5,000 were reduced by 15%;

Civil claims of more than R$5,000 and equal to or less than R$10,000 were reduced by 20%;

Civil claims of more than R$10,000 and equal to or less than R$150,000 were reduced by 30%; and

Civil claims of more than R$150,000 were reduced by 50%.

Under the RJ Plan, if judicial deposits have been made with respect to unadjudicated civil claims, following adjudication of their claims, the holders of these civil claims that expressly agree with the amounts of the civil claims acknowledged by the RJ Debtors, including those recognized by the RJ Court, and waive the right to offer, propose, or proceed with credit actions, qualifications, divergences, objections, or any other measure (including appeals) which aim at increasing the amounts of their civil claims, will be paid, subject to the reduction of the amount of any civil claim classified as a Class III claim as described above, through the application of judicial deposits related to these civil claims until the balance of the relevant judicial deposits has been exhausted. Any amount of a civil claim remaining unpaid after the application of the related judicial deposit will entitle the holder to the Default Recovery with respect to the balance of that civil claim. In the event that the related judicial deposit is greater than the amount that the holder of a civil claim is entitled to withdraw, the RJ Debtors will be entitled to withdraw the difference from the judicial deposit.

Settlement of Class III and Class IV Claims – Default Recovery

Under the RJ Plan, (1) creditors that were entitled to make recovery elections as described above and failed to make such elections or elected the Default Recovery, (2) ANATEL, with respect to some of its claims as described above, and (3) holders of civil claims (other than claims of ANATEL and other regulatory agencies) in amounts that exceed the related judicial deposit will be entitled to the Default Recovery with respect some or all of their claims.

Under the RJ Plan, the Default Recovery will consist of an unsecured right to receive payment of 100% of the amount of a recognized claims payable in five equal annual installments, commencing on the 20th anniversary of the Brazilian Confirmation Date for creditors resident in Brazil or the 20th anniversary of the date on which the RJ Plan is recognized in the jurisdiction in which the creditor is resident for creditors not resident in Brazil. If the recognized claim was derived from an obligation denominated inreais, the payments will be made inreais and the claim will bear interest at the TR rate with all accrued interest payable at final maturity. If the recognized claim was derived from an obligation denominated in U.S. dollars or euros, the payments will be made in U.S. dollars or euros, respectively, and the claim will not bear interest.

Under the RJ Plan, Oi has the option of, at any time, to settle all amount payable under the Default Recovery prior to their maturities by means of the payment of 15% of the aggregate amount of the related claims plus capitalized interest to the date of the exercise of this option.

Implementation of Management Changes Required by the Judicial Reorganization Plan

Pursuant to the RJ Plan, as from the date of the approval of the RJ Plan on December 20, 2017 until the election of a new board of directors in accordance with the RJ Plan, Oi had a transitional board of directors composed of nine members set forth in the RJ Plan, each of whom served without an alternate member.

However, the RJ Court suspended the voting rights of certain shareholders and ordered the removal of the members of the Oi’s board of directors indicated by them until the occurrence of the capital increase provided for in the RJ Plan. As a result, as of March 7, 2018, three members of the transitional board of directors were removed from their positions.

Pursuant to the RJ Plan, Oi was required to engage a human resources consultant to assist with the selection of an operating officer. This process was concluded on March 21, 2018 with the election by Oi’s board of directors of José Claudio Moreira Gonçalves to serve on Oi’s board of executive officers as Oi’s Chief Operating Officer. In addition, on that date, Oi’s board of directors elected Bernardo Kos Winik to Oi’s board of executive officers and the newly created position of Chief Commercial Officer.

Pursuant to the RJ Plan, Oi also engaged a human resources consultant to assist with the selection of the nominees for its new board of directors. On September 17, 2018, the general shareholders’ meeting of Oi ratified the election of the members of the new board of directors indicated by Oi’s management in accordance with the RJ Plan. The effectiveness of the installation of the members of the new board of directors was conditioned on the prior approval of ANATEL, which ANATEL conditionally granted on September 13, 2018 and confirmed on September 19, 2018.

Exercise of Warrants and ADWs

On October 26, 2018, our board of directors confirmed the issuance of 112,598,610 Common Shares and the delivery of such Common Shares to holders of its Warrants that exercised their Warrants on or prior to October 24, 2018, including Warrants represented by 22,135,429 ADWs that were exercised on or prior to October 18, 2018.

On December 5, 2018, our board of directors confirmed the issuance of 3,314,745 Common Shares and the delivery of such Common Shares to holders of its Warrants that exercised their Warrants from October 25, 2018 through December 3, 2018, including Warrants represented by 662,949 ADWs that were exercised from October 19, 2018 through November 27, 2018.

On January 4, 2019, our board of directors confirmed the issuance of 275,985 Common Shares and the delivery of such Common Shares to holders of its Warrants that exercised their Warrants from December 4, 2018 through January 2, 2019, including Warrants represented by 55,197 ADWs that were exercised from November 28, 2018 through December 26, 2018.

All Warrants that were not exercised on or prior to January 2, 2019, including all ADWs that were not exercised on or prior to December 26, 2018, have been cancelled.Court.

Preemptive Offering and Closing Under Commitment Agreement

As contemplated by Section 6 of the RJ Plan, on November 13, 2018, we commenced a preemptive offering of Common Shares that was registered with the SEC under the Securities Act under which holders of our Common Shares and Preferred Shares including the ADS Depositary and The Bank of New York Mellon, as depositary of the Preferred ADS program, received 1.333630 transferable rights for each Common Share or Preferred Share held as of November 19, 2018. Each subscription right entitled its holder to subscribe to one Common Share at a subscription price of R$1.24 per Common Share. In addition, each holder of a subscription right was entitled to request the subscription for additional Common Shares, up to the total of 3,225,806,451 Common Shares that were offered in the preemptive offering less the total number of initial Common Shares.

The subscription rights expired on January 4, 2019. On January 16, 2019, we issued 1,530,457,356 Common Shares to holders of subscription rights that had exercised those subscription rights with respect to the initial Common Shares, including the depositaries under the deposit agreements relating to our ADSs.Shares. On January 21, 2019, we issued 91,080,933 Common Shares to holders of subscription rights that had requested subscriptions for excess Common Shares, including the depositaries under the deposit agreements relating to our ADSs.Shares. The proceeds of these subscriptions waswere R$2,011 million.

On January 25, 2019, we issued 1,604,268,162 Common Shares, representing the total number of Common Shares that were offered in the preemptive offering less the total number of initial Common Shares and excess Common Shares, to the Backstop Investors in a private placement under the terms of the RJ Plan and the Commitment Agreement for the aggregate amount of R$1,989 million. In addition, under the terms of the RJ Plan and the Commitment Agreement, on that date we issued 272,148,705 Common Shares in a private placement to the Backstop Investors and paid US$13 million to the Backstop Investors as compensation for their commitments under the Commitment Agreement.

Pharol Settlement Agreement

On January 8, 2019, Oi and its subsidiaries Telemar and PT Participações entered into a settlement agreement with Bratel and Pharol, or the Pharol Settlement Agreement, which provides, among other things, for the termination of all then-existing litigation involving the parties in Brazil and abroad.

Under the Pharol Settlement Agreement Oi was required to: (1) pay Bratel an amount in U.S. dollars corresponding to €25 million, which under the Pharol Settlement Agreement was used by Pharol for the subscription of 85,721,774 Common Shares issued by Oi in our preemptive offering of Common Shares; and (2) upon confirmation of the Pharol Settlement Agreement by the RJ Court, (a) transfer to Bratel 32,000,000 Common Shares and 1,800,000 Preferred Shares of Oi held in treasury, (b) pay Pharol the annual fees related to certain obligations assumed by Oi with respect to proceedings of Pharol in Portugal, and (c) in case of a sale of at least 50% of the shares of Unitel indirectly held by Oi, deposit into an escrow account an amount necessary to guarantee the payment of any potential liabilities of Pharol in tax proceedings whose chance of loss is assessed as possible or probable.

Under the Pharol Settlement Agreement, on February 8, 2019, the member designated by Oi was elected to Pharol’s board of directors.

On February 28, 2019, the RJ Court confirmed the Pharol Settlement Agreement by a decision published in the Official Gazette of the State of Rio de Janeiro on March 12, 2019. This decision became final on April 3, 2019.

During February 2019, we repurchased a total of 1,800,000 Preferred Shares over the B3 at prices ranging between R$1.42 and R$1.45 per Preferred Share, for an aggregate purchase price of R$2.6 million. These Preferred Shares were transferred to Pharol to satisfy the terms of the Pharol Settlement Agreement. Oi has satisfied the other terms of the Pharol Settlement Agreement applicable to our company and on April 4, 2019, all then-existing litigation involving the parties in Brazil and abroad was terminated.

Merger of Copart 4 with and into Telemar and Merger of Copart 5 with and into Oi

In January 2019, Copart 4 was merged with and into Telemar and in March 2019, Copart 5 was merged with and into Oi.

Sale of Interest in CVTelecom

On May 21, 2019, PT Ventures sold all of the shares that it owned of Cabo Verde Telecom, S.A., or CVTelecom, a provider of fixed-line and mobile services in the Cabo Verde Islands, representing 40% of CVTelecom’s share capital, to the National Social Security Institute (Instituto Nacional de Previdência Social) and state-owned company, ASA – National Airport and Aerial Security Company (ASA – Empresa Nacional de Aeroportos e Segurança Aérea, S.A.), for US$26 million. This sale generated a net gain of R$67 million.

In connection with the sale of the CVTelecom shares, PT Ventures entered into an agreement with the government of Cabo Verde for the definite termination of the arbitration proceedings pending before the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes and the International Chamber of Commerce that had been filed by PT Ventures against the government of Cabo Verde in March 2015.

Adoption of Strategic Plan

OnJuly 16, 2019, we announced our plan to pursue strategic alternatives, with a focus on the improvement of our operational and financial performance with a sustainable business model, for the purpose of maximizing enterprise value, in the context of the RJ process. We developed this plan in collaboration with a group of strategic advisors following an assessment of each of our business units focused on competitive advantages, effective capital allocation and anticipated funding needs to execute this plan.

The principal elements of this plan include:

accelerating our deployment of FTTH leveraging ournon-replicable fiber optic network to become the national leader in FTTH;

accelerating our wholesale operation to exploit the full potential of the unregulated market for wholesale transmission services utilizing our fiber optic network as we seek to become the leading provider of infrastructure in support of 5G services in Brazil;

increasing our focus on our information and communications technology solutions business;

leveraging our mobile network capacity by increasing our investment in 4G and 4.5G services using our available 1.8 GHz spectrum and increasing our marketing efforts focused on high-value post-paid customers to increase revenue of our mobile services;

exploring strategic alternatives with respect to our mobile business to maximize shareholder value;

implementing a sustainable program of cost reductions based on opportunities identified by our management in our sales and marketing, organizational processes, information technology, procurement and network operations activities;

divestingnon-core assets, including communications towers, data centers, our African investments, certain real estate and othernon-strategic assets, as part of our efforts to finance our capital expenditure plans.

Sale of PT Ventures

On January 24, 2020, Africatel sold and transferred 100% of the share capital of PT Ventures to Sonangol for an aggregate purchase price of US$1 billion, of which US$61 million was paid to Africatel prior to the transfer of the shares, and Sonangol paid US$699 million of the purchase price in cash on the closing date. The remaining US$240 million of the purchase price is to be paid to Africatel by Sonangol by July 31, 2020, with a guaranteed minimum monthly payment of US$40 million beginning in February 2020 and we have received the minimum monthly payments due in February and March 2020. Payment of the remaining purchase price is fully guaranteed by a letter of credit. Pursuant to the Pharol Settlement Agreement, we deposited 34 million euros of the proceeds of this sale in an escrow account to cover losses relating to certain tax proceedings against Pharol.

The principal assets of PT Ventures included (1) a 25% stake in Unitel, (2) a 40% stake in Multitel Serviços de Telecomunicações Lda., (3) rights to dividends previously declared by Unitel, but not received by PT Ventures, and (4) all rights arising from a final award in the amount of approximately US$659 million in an arbitration proceeding initiated by PT Ventures against the other Unitel shareholders.

Sale of Botafogo Property

On February 21, 2020, we sold our property at Rua General Polidoro nº 99, Botafogo, Rio de Janeiro, to Alianza Gestão de Recursos Ltda. for R$120.5 million.

Market Sounding Regarding Mobile Business

During the first quarter of 2020, our financial advisor, Bank of America Merrill Lynch, conducted a market sounding process seeking to gauge the interest of a variety of strategic investors in the acquisition of our mobile business. The goal of the market sounding process was to assist us in identifying opportunities relating to our mobile business, and to enable us to make a preliminary assessment regarding the creation of value arising out of a potential sale of our mobile business.

In March 2020, Bank of America Merrill Lynch received manifestations of interest from several of these investors. We continue to analyze these manifestations of interest, and are engaging is discussions with certain of these investors regarding due diligence matters. However, we have not entered into any binding agreement with respect to any proposed sale of our mobile business and cannot do so without approval of the RJ Court. Although we may engage in negotiations with certain of these investors to discuss the terms under which these investors would be willing to make a binding proposal, any binding proposals would be required to be submitted pursuant to a process supervised by the RJ Court following an amendment to the RJ Plan to include the process necessary to solicit such binding proposals.

There can be no assurance that the RJ Plan will be amended in a manner necessary to facilitate the potential sale of our mobile business, that a process to solicit binding proposals supervised by the RJ Court will result in our receiving proposals containing terms and conditions, including the purchase price, that will be satisfactory to our company, that we will be able to fulfill the conditions included in any binding proposal, or the timing of the completion of any potential sale of our mobile business.

Changes to the Membership of Oi’s Board of Directors and Board of Executive Officers

Since January 1, 2019, there have been several changes to the composition of Oi’s board of directors and board of executive officers.

On June 3, 2019, Ricardo Reisen de Pinho resigned as a member of Oi’s board of directors.

On September 20, 2019, Oi’s board of directors elected Rodrigo Modesto de Abreu to serve as a member of our board of executive officers, without specific designation, to act as our chief operating officer, and Mr. Abreu resigned as a member of our board of directors.

On October 31, 2019, Carlos Augusto Machado Pereira de Almeida Brandão resigned as our chief financial officer and investor relations officer and Eurico de Jesus Teles Neto resigned as our chief legal officer. On the same date, Oi’s board of directors elected Camille Loyo Faria to serve as our chief financial officer and investor relations officer and elected Antonio Reinaldo Rabelo Filho to serve as our chief legal officer.

On January 31, 2020, Eurico de Jesus Teles Neto resigned as our chief executive officer. On the same date, Oi’s board of directors elected Rodrigo Modesto de Abreu to serve as our chief executive officer.

On March 4, 2020, Oi’s board of directors appointed Claudia Quintella Woods to fill one of the vacancies on Oi’s board of directors, and on March 13, 2020, Oi’s board of directors appointed Armando Lins Netto to fill the remaining vacancy on Oi’s board of directors. The investiture of Mr. Armando Lins Netto is conditioned upon the prior assessment of ANATEL.

For information about the current members of Oi’s board of directors and board of executive officers, see “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees.”

Issuance of Oi Mobile Debentures

In February 2020, an investor subscribed to an aggregate amount of R$2,500 million of Oi Mobile’snon-convertible secured debentures. These debentures are guaranteed by Oi and Telemar and are secured by a pledge of cash flows from our receivables in an amount up to R$200 million per month and a first-priority lien on our right to use mobile frequencies. These debentures mature in January 2022 in the event that we raise more than R$5 billion from our divestments by July 31, 2020, and will amortize at a rate of R$100 million per month beginning in August 2020 through January 2022 in the event that we do not achieve this divestment target. These debentures bear PIK interest, capitalized monthly, through January 2021 at a rate of 12.66% per annum based on the daily U.S. dollar equivalent principal amount determined in accordance with the daily exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the Brazilianreal, and interest at a rate of 13.61% per annum, payable in cash, thereafter.

Corporate Structure

The following chart presents Oi’s corporate structure and principal operating subsidiaries as of April 24, 2020. For a complete list of our subsidiaries, see Exhibit 8.01 to this annual report.

LOGO

Our Services

We provide the following services:

Residential Services throughout Brazil (other than in the State of São Paulo) consisting of local and long-distance fixed-line voice services, broadband services andPay-TV services under ourOi TV brand, primarily through direct to home, or DTH (a satellite technology), which we offer throughout Brazil;

Personal Mobility Services throughout Brazil consisting of mobile voice and data telecommunications services as well as value-added services; and

B2B Services throughout Brazil consisting of our fixed-line and mobile voice and data telecommunications services, broadband services andPay-TV services, which are marketed and delivered to SME, corporate and governmental customers, as well as interconnection services, wholesale network usage services and traffic transportation services, which are primarily marketed and delivered to corporate customers (including other telecommunications providers).

Residential Services

We offer our residential services as bundles, including bundles with other services including our mobile voice and data communications services, as well as on an a la carte basis. In the Residential Services business, we view the household, rather than an individual, as our customer, and our offerings, particularly our bundled offerings, are designed to meet the needs of the household as a whole.

Fixed-Line Voice Services

Local fixed-line services include installation, monthly subscription, metered services, collect calls and supplemental local services. Metered services include local calls that originate and terminate within a single local area and calls between separate local areas within specified metropolitan regions, which we refer to as local calls. ANATEL has divided our fixed-line service areas into approximately 4,400 local areas.

Calls within Brazil that are not classified as local calls are classified as domestic long-distance calls. We provide domestic and international long-distance services for calls originating from fixed-line devices in our fixed-line service areas.

Under our concession agreements, we are required to offer two local fixed-line plans to users: the Basic Plan per Minute (Plano Básico de Minutos) and the Mandatory Alternative Service Plan (Plano Alternativo de Serviços de Oferta Obrigatória), to which a small percentage of our residential customers subscribe. A large majority of our residential customers subscribe to one of a variety of alternative fixed-line plans that we offer, which are designed to meet our customers’ usage profiles, including our bundled services plans. We continually monitor customer usage profiles and preferences and periodically revise our alternative fixed-line plans and promotions in order to better service the needs of our residential customers.

Broadband Services

We offer fixed broadband services through xDSL technologies and FTTH, with speeds ranging from 1 megabit per second, or Mbps, to 200 Mbps. We offer broadband services to our residential customers as mostly part of bundled plans with our traditional fixed-line services. Customers pay a fixed monthly subscription fee, irrespective of their actual connection time to the internet.

As of December 31, 2019, our network covered 85.3% of the municipalities in our fixed-line service areas, reaching a total of more than 3.6 million fixed broadband customers, and our national fiber network reached approximately 4.6 million homes through FTTH. As of December 31, 2019, we offered FTTH in 82 municipalities, an increase of 54 municipalities as compared to December 31, 2018. We continue to strategically invest in our broadband network in areas that we believe have the greatest potential for sales and growth.

As with our traditional fixed-line services, we continually monitor customer usage profiles and preferences and periodically revise our broadband plans and promotions in order to better service the needs of our residential customers, to encourage our existing broadband customers to migrate to plans offering higher speeds and to attract new customers to our broadband services.

Pay-TV Services

We deliverPay-TV services throughout our fixed-line service areas using our DTH satellite network. We also deliverPay-TV services through our fiber optic network (internet protocolPay-TV, or IPTV) in all the cities where we have deployed FTTH.

We offerPay-TV services to our residential customers as part of bundled plans with our traditional fixed-line services or on an a la carte basis. We offer several packages ofPay-TV channels at different price points and offer subscribers to each of these packages the option to customize the package through the purchase of additional channels featuring films offered by HBO/Cinemax and Telecine and sports offered by Futebol.

As with our traditional fixed-line services, we continually monitor customer usage profiles and preferences and periodically revise ourPay-TV plans and promotions in order to better service the needs of our residential customers and to attract new customers to ourPay-TV services.

Bundled Services

As an integrated telecommunications service provider, we focus a significant part of our marketing efforts on promoting our bundled services offerings, including through offers of free installation of fixed-line and broadband services, free modem andWi-Fi and access to certain smartphone applications free of charge. Our bundled services offerings for residential customers have focused on increasing our profitability by providing a more comprehensive mix of higher-value services to our customers. Our market research has shown that bundled offerings build customer loyalty and serve to reduce churn rates as compared to standalone services. In addition, we believe that by developing unique, multi-product bundles with joint installation, integrated billing and unified customer service, we set ourselves apart from other service providers.

We offer a variety of bundled services, including ourOi Total portfolio, consisting of:

Oi Total Solução Completa, our quadruple-play bundle that combines fixed-line voice, broadband data,Pay-TV and mobile voice and data services;

Oi Total Conectado, ourtriple-pay bundle that combines fixed-line voice, broadband data and mobile voice and data services;

Oi Total Residencial, our residential bundle that combines fixed-line voice, broadband data andPay-TV;

Oi Total TV + Fixo, a bundle that combines fixed-line voice andPay-TV; and

Oi Total Play, a bundle that combines fixed-line voice, broadband access and OTT content (Oi Play).

Customers who subscribe to bundles receive price discounts and double the data allowance that we offer on an a la carte basis.

In addition toOi Total, we offer bundles for residential customers that subscribe to our IPTV service that include broadband subscriptions at speeds of up to 200 Mbps. Subscriptions to our IPTV packages are only available in areas in which we have deployed our FTTH network. Outside our FTTH network, we offerPay-TV services throughout our fixed-line service areas using our DTH satellite network.

Personal Mobility Services

Our Personal Mobility Services business offerspre-paid and post-paid mobile voice and data communications plans:Oi Livre plans for thepre-paid market;Oi Mais plans for the post-paid market; andOi Mais Controle as a hybrid solution. Although we no longer offer new subscriptions for voice-only mobile services, we continue to provide services to customers that have subscribed to these legacy plans. Since our 3G and 4G networks offer greater capacity to meet the growing demand for data, we are focused on accelerating the migration of users from 2G to 3G and from 3G to 4G by encouraging sales of 3G/4G smartphones and by including more data allowances in our new mobile offers.

Pre-Paid Plans

Pre-paid customers activate their cellular numbers through the purchase and installation of a SIM card in their mobile handsets. We offerpre-paid voice and data bundles through ourOi Livre portfolio. OurOi Livre portfolio includes a range ofall-net voice minutes for calls within Brazil (including unlimited minutes through theOi Livre Ilimitado plans) and data allowances (ranging from 1 GB to 4 GB of 4G mobile data) for flat fees. Customers choose the amount of time they have to use their voice and data allowances, ranging from seven to 30 days. Using theMinha Oi application on their smartphones, customers can freely switch between their data and voice allowances depending on their individual needs using apre-determined exchange rate. Ourpre-paid customers are able to add credits to their accounts throughpoint-of-sale machines, ATMs, Apple and Android applications installed on their mobile devices such asMinha Oi andRecarga Oi using a credit card, our toll-free number or the purchase ofpre-paid cards at a variety of prices. These credits are valid for a fixed period of time following activation and can be extended when additional credits are purchased.

Post-Paid Plans

Customers of our post-paid plans are billed on a monthly basis for contracted services used during the previous month, in addition to any fees for special services. OurOi MaisDigital portfoliooffers unlimited text messages, unlimited minutes for calls to any operator in Brazil and two mobile data plans (8 GB and 50 GB) with no usage restrictions, plus no data traffic charge for major social networks and video to apps, which vary according to the data plan, and include, among others: YouTube, Netflix, Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp and Messenger. Customers can include up to four additional lines and manage or share their data plan through our self-serve application,Minha Oi. Our premium plan subscription also includesOi Play bundled with video streaming services. To increase our value proposition, in addition to mobile voice and data services, we bundle premium content and services including newspapers, magazines ande-books.

Hybrid Plans

Our hybrid plans present strategic value for our company because they combine the advantages ofpre-paid offerings, such as the absence of bad debt and a favorable impact on working capital, with advantages of post-paid offerings, such as a heavier consumption profile and higher ARPUs. We improve our revenues and market share through the offer of hybrid plans by consolidating customer recharges in our hybrid plans’ SIM cards and by improving the mix of offerings to the post-paid market.

We offer theOi Mais Controle portfolio of plans for customers who wish to combine the cost savings of our post-paid plans with the self-imposed limits of ourpre-paid plans.Oi Mais Controle subscribers have similar benefits as theOi Mais customers, such as data packages with no usage restrictions, unlimited text messaging and unlimitedall-net voice minutes for calls within Brazil, combined with the ability ofOi Livre customers to freely switch between their data and voice allowances depending on their individual needs using apre-determined exchange rate using theMinha Oi application on their smartphones.

Value-Added Services

In 2019, we continued to accelerate our digital transformation process, which included restructuring our value-added services under the following categories: (1) films and series; (2) education; (3) health; (4) written media; and (5) utilities. Within each category, we highlight the following value-added services:

Films and Series

Premium streaming services including HBO GO, FOX +, Telecine Play, Watch ESPN, Discovery Kids andColeção Oi.

Education

Busuu: a language learning application offering 11 languages and a social network for users;

Oi Para Aprender:a learning platform that provides a variety of courses and tips regarding languages, entrance examinations, job assessments, how to develop a home office business and software lessons, among others; and

Descomplica: a premium learning streaming platform that provides high quality courses focused on the Brazilian university entrance examination.

Health

BT FIT: an automated personal trainer service that provides a variety of courses and exercises and creates personalized training program for the user; and

Saúde UP: a service that offers health content, as well as discounts in a wide network of pharmacies, medical exams and medical consultations, as well as a nurse on call.

Written Media

Oi Revistas: a service that provides online and downloadable access to hundreds of magazines from renowned publishers such as Globo, Abril, Editora Três and others; and

Oi Jornais: a service that provides online and downloadable access to various newspapers, as well as real time news notifications.

Utilities

Oi Apps Club:a subscription-based marketplace for highly rated Android apps, Oi Apps Club provides customers unlimited access to download apps, charged to the customer’s Oi bill rather than a credit card;

Oi Games Pro: a multiplatform gaming experience that offers unlimited games on mobile phones as well as a new computer game per month;

Truecaller: a caller ID service with the ability to block undesired calls; and

Oi Segurança: a service that offers a variety of functionality, such as antivirus, backup, device locator and parental controls, among others.

Our value-added services are developed by third-party application or content providers and offered to our customers.

B2B Services

In our B2B Services business, we serve SME, corporate and governmental customers and other telecommunications providers. We offer a variety of services to our SME, corporate and governmental customers, including our core fixed-line, broadband and mobile services, as well as our value-added services, advanced voice services and commercial data transmission services. For our corporate customers, we also offer information technology services, such as network management and security, storage, Smartcloud, anti-distributed denial of service andmachine-to-machine products, which enable communication between a product and its control center or database (such as a car and its GPS navigation system), in order to expand our revenue sources from corporate customers beyond voice services, increase customer loyalty and ensure greater revenue predictability. We also provide specialized wholesale services, consisting of data network services and facilities, interconnection, national and international voice traffic transit and roaming.

Services for SMEs

We offer SME services similar to those offered to our residential and personal mobility customers, including fixed-line and mobile voice services, and fixed-line and mobile broadband services. We also launched FTTH plans for SMEs. In addition, we offer SMEs:

advanced voice services, primarily 0800 (toll free) services, as well as voice portals where customers can participate in real-time chats and other interactive voice services;

dedicated internet connectivity and data network services; and

value-added services, such as help desk support that provides assistance for technical support issues, web services with hosting,e-mail tools and website builder and security applications.

In general, our sales team works with our SME customer to determine that customer’s telecommunications needs and negotiates a package of services and pricing structure that is best suited to its needs.

Services for Corporate Customers

We offer corporate customers all of the services offered to our SME customers. In addition, we provide a variety of customized, high-speed data transmission services through various technologies and means of access to corporate customers. Our principal data transmission services for corporate customers are:

we act as the internet service provider for our corporate customers, connecting their networks to the internet;

Dedicated Line Services (Serviços de Linhas Dedicadas), or SLD, under which we lease dedicated lines to corporate customers for use in private networks that link different corporate websites; and

IP services which consist of dedicated internet connection, as well as Virtual Private Network, or VPN, services that enable our customers to connect their private intranet and extranet networks to deliver videoconferencing, video/image transmission and multimedia applications.

We provide these services at data transmission speeds of 2 Mbps to 100 Gbps.

We also offer information technology infrastructure services to our corporate customers, seeking to offer themend-to-end solutions through which we are able to provide and manage their connectivity and information technology needs. For example, we offerOi SmartCloud, a suite of data processing and data storage services that we perform through our five cyber data centers located in Brasília, São Paulo, Curitiba and Porto Alegre. In addition, through these data centers, we provide hosting, collocation and IT outsourcing services, permitting our customers to outsource their IT infrastructures to us or to use these centers to provide backup for their IT systems.

We also offer the following five major service groups throughOi SmartCloud, which operate through our five cyber data centers:

collaborative solutions, a hosting and sharing platform that provides employees with access to company documents;

business applications, anin-memory computing platform for large amounts of data;

Oi GestãoMobilidade, a mobile device management service focused on providing logistics and security solutions relating to mobile devices;

Security services, a centralized, anti-spam filtering solution for corporate email; and

Telepresence as a Service (TPaaS), a video-conferencing service that allows collaboration among people at remote locations.

We also offer various services based on IT applications:

fleet management services, which provide a management system for fleet monitoring and location targeting, economies of scale for fuel costs, driver profile analysis and kilometer control for maintenance;

Interação Web, a digital marketing service, which allows us to implement on the website of our B2B Services customers an intelligent interaction with their digital users in real time;

workforce management, which provides a system with web and mobile applications to monitor and control the workforce in the field and optimize routes and control logistics activities; and

digital content management (corporate TV platform and queue management), which provides a digital signage platform with queue management solutions, creating a powerful marketing tool for companies that have interactions with customers at points of sale.

In order to provide complete solutions to our corporate clients, we have entered into service agreements for the joint supply of international data services with a number of important international data services providers. These commercial relationships with international data services providers are part of our strategy of offering telecommunications services packages to our customers.

Wholesale Services

We are the largest wholesale service provider in Brazil. We are responsible for providing services over the local access network and over the long distance network. Almost 2,000 service providers use our network to deliver services ranging from telephony and broadband to high-speed data connections for businesses of all sizes.

Our portfolio includes specialized services, consisting of data network services and facilities, interconnection, national and international voice traffic transit, roaming and infrastructure sharing.

Data Network Services and Facilities

We provide services referred to as industrial exploration of dedicated line (Exploração Industrial de Linha Dedicada), or EILD, pursuant to our concession agreement. The EILD consists of leased lines and clear channel protocols for the provision of services to third parties.

In addition, we are able to offer a complete portfolio of wholesale products, includingfiber-to-the-x, or FTTx, solutions, IP, Ethernet and Multi-Protocol Label Switching, or MPLS. All of these products are used to meet the demands of other network operators and regional internet providers. The circuits are requested with different service level agreements; and we are required to provide the facilities with contingency routes, sites and equipment to improve the service against points of failure.

Interconnection

As part of our wholesale services, we provide interconnection services to users of other network providers. The interconnection is a link between compatible telecommunications networks which permits that a fixed or mobile service user of one network can adequately communicate with the users of a network from another provider. All providers of telecommunication services (fixed or mobile) are required to provide interconnection upon request to any other telecommunication collective service provider. The interconnection agreements are negotiated according to the General Rules on Interconnection (Regulamento Geral de Interconexão), established by ANATEL.

Voice Traffic Transit

We offer national and international voice traffic transit that meets all our customers’ expectations and satisfies the dynamic needs of the telecommunications market. Direct interconnections with the major national and international telecommunication carriers, as well as most small carriers, ensure high-quality voice traffic transit in Brazil.

Roaming

We provide Global System for Mobile Communications, or GSM, roaming in Brazil to national and international mobile operators. Our roaming agreements enables mobile users to automatically make and receive voice calls, send and receive SMS as well as access internet service while traveling outside the geographical coverage area of their own home network by using our mobile network.

Marketing and Distribution

We focus our marketing efforts on the upselling to our existing clients while strengthening the “Oi” brand through our convergent services offerings and promotion of ourMinha Oi smartphone application, which allows ourpre-paid customers to freely switch between their data and voice allowances. We also engage in digital marketing and multiple customer relationship management (CRM) marketing programs to support our B2B Services business.

We strive to increase the visibility of our brand and provide a consistent branding message. In the year ended December 31, 2019, we adjusted our brand strategy and placed greater emphasis on marketing our fiber services and post-paid mobile packages. In addition, we developed a new strategy for addressing our corporate clients, which now focuses on providing products and infrastructure to address the needs of large corporations, including ACT solutions, outsourcing, and cybersecurity.

During the year ended December 31, 2019, we increased our investment in advertising, with a focus on digital advertising, with the goal of improving traffic to our digital channels and generating sales in other channels. In addition to digital advertising, we used traditional advertising mediums, such as cable and network television and radio to increase our presence and the reach of our branding. In addition, we developed a detailed communications strategy to grow sales of our FTTH services.

To grow our customer base, we use proprietary media tools including telemarketing,e-mail and text messages. We also developed a branded content strategy, combining sponsorships of events, athletes and influencers to increase brand awareness and demonstrate our credibility.

Distribution Channels

We distribute our services through channels focused on three separate sectors of the telecommunications services market: (1) residential customers, including customers of our mobile services to whom we sell bundled plans; (2) personal mobility customers that purchase our mobile services independently of our bundled plans; and (3) business and corporate customers.

Residential Services

Our distribution channels for residential customers are focused on sales of fixed-line services, including voice, broadband services andOi TV, and post-paid mobile services. As of December 31, 2019, the principal distribution channels that we used for sales to residential customers were:

our own network of stores, which included 125 “Oi” branded stores;

508 “Oi” franchised service stores and kiosks located in the largest shopping malls and other high density areas throughout Brazil;

6,837 stores located throughout our service areas that primarily sell telecommunications products and services and have entered into exclusivity agreements with us;

our telemarketing sales channel, which is operated by our call center and other third-party agents and consists of 1,400 sales representatives that answer more than 314,000 calls per month. This channel provides us with the ability to proactively reach new customers, thereby increasing our client base and revenues, and also receives calls prompted by our offers made in numerous types of media;

our “teleagents” channel, which consists of 679 local sales agents that operate in specific regions and complement our telemarketers;

door-to-door sales calls made by our sales force of 2,537 salespeople trained to sell our services throughout Brazil in places where customers generally are not reachable by telemarketing; and

oure-commerce sites through which customers may purchase a variety of our services.

Personal Mobility Services

Our distribution channels for personal mobility customers are focused on sales of mobile services to post-paid customers andpre-paid customers, including mobile broadband customers. As of December 31, 2019, the principal distribution channels that we used for sales of ourpre-paid Personal Mobility Services were:

our own network of stores, which included 175 “Oi” branded stores;

540 “Oi” franchised service stores and kiosks located in the largest shopping malls and other high density areas throughout Brazil;

524 stores that are part of large national chains that sell our post-paid andpre-paid Personal Mobility Services and SIM cards;

approximately nine multi-brand distributors that distribute our SIM cards andpre-paid mobile cards to approximately 280,000 pharmacies, supermarkets, newsstands and similar outlets;

our telemarketing sales channel has 1,832 sales representatives that answer more than 659,000 calls per month selling our post-paid personal mobility services; and

our website, through which ourpre-paid customers may recharge their SIM cards.

B2B Services

We have established separate distribution channels to serve SME and corporate customers. As of December 31, 2019, the principal distribution channels that we use to market our services to SMEs were:

Oi” exclusive agents with 1,057door-to-door sales consultants that are dedicated to understanding and addressing the communications needs of our existing and prospective SME customers;

our telemarketing sales channel, which consists of two agents that use sales representatives that are specifically trained to discuss the business needs of our prospective SME customers to make sales calls, as well as representatives in our call center and representatives at call centers under contract with us to receive calls from existing and prospective SME customers to sell services to new customers and promote higher-value and additional services to existing customers. In addition, our telemarketing channel utilizes customer retention representatives; and

our website and theOi Mais Empresas application.

We market our entire range of services to corporate customers through our own direct sales force which meets with current and prospective corporate customers to discuss the business needs of these enterprises and design solutions intended to address their communications needs. Our client service model focuses on post-sale service and we regularly discuss service needs and improvements through calls and meetings with our customers. As of December 31, 2019, our corporate sales team, excluding post-sale service personnel, was composed of approximately 326 employees operating in 10 regional offices.

Rates, Billing and Collection

Rates

Our rates for certain services, including basic local fixed-line and domestic long-distance plans, interconnection, EILD and SLD services, are generally subject to regulation by ANATEL. Under our current authorizations, we are allowed to set prices for our mobile service plans, provided that such amounts do not exceed a specified inflation adjusted cap. The rates for other telecommunications services, such as broadband services, IP services and frame relay services are market oriented but may still be subject to ANATEL regulation. Furthermore, the rates for DTH and IP TV services are not subject to ANATEL regulation.

For more information about the regulations applicable to our rates, see “—Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry.”

Billing and Collection

Residential Services

We send each of our Residential Services customers a monthly bill covering all the services provided during the prior monthly period. Customers are grouped in billing cycles based on the date their bills are issued. Each bill separately itemizes service packages, local calls, long-distance calls, calls terminating on a mobile network, toll-free services and other services such as call waiting, voicemail and call forwarding. Payments of Residential Services bills are due within an average of 15 days after the billing date. We charge late-payment interest at a rate of 1% per month plus aone-time late charge of 2% of the amount outstanding. We have agreements with several banks for the receipt and processing of payments from our Residential Services customers. A variety of businesses, such as lottery houses, drugstores and grocery stores, accept payments from our Residential Services customers as agents for these banks. As of December 31, 2019, 16.5% of all accounts receivable due from our Residential Services customers in Brazil were outstanding for more than 30 days and 13.5%, were outstanding for more than 90 days.

We are required to include in our monthly Residential Services bills charges incurred by our customers for long-distance services provided by other long-distance service providers upon the request of these providers. We have billing agreements with each long-distance telecommunications service provider that interconnects with our networks under which we bill our customers for any long-distance calls originated on our network that are carried by another long-distance service provider and transfer the balance to the relevant provider after deducting any access fees due for the use of our network.

ANATEL regulations permit us to restrict outgoing calls made by a Residential Services customer 15 days after we send the customer a past due notice, restrict incoming calls received by a Residential Services customer 30 days after the restriction on outgoing calls is imposed, and disconnect a Residential Services customer after 30 days after the restriction on incoming calls is imposed. The disconnection process thus comprises several stages, including customer notification regarding the referral of their delinquency to credit bureaus, before the Residential Services customer may be ultimately disconnected due tonon-payment. Notices range from voice messages to active calls for negotiation with the customer. Our collection system enables us to access delinquent subscribers’ accounts according to their payment profile. This profile takes into consideration, among other things, the length of subscription, the outstanding balance of the account and the longest payment delays.

Personal Mobility Services

We bill our post-paid Personal Mobility Services customers on a monthly basis and itemize charges in the same manner as we bill our Residential Services customers. In addition, the monthly bills also provide details regarding minutes used and roaming charges. Payments are due within an average of 15 days after the billing date. We charge late-payment interest at a rate of 1% per month plus aone-time late charge of 2% of the amount outstanding. As with our Residential Services business, we have agreements with several banks for the receipt and processing of payments from our post-paid Personal Mobility Services customers. A variety of businesses, such as lottery houses, drugstores and grocery stores, accept payments from our post-paid Personal Mobility Services customers as agents for these banks. As of December 31, 2019, 19.3% of all accounts receivable due from our Personal Mobility Services customers in Brazil were outstanding for more than 30 days, and 17.0% were outstanding for more than 90 days.

ANATEL regulations permit us to restrict outgoing calls made and text messages sent by a post-paid Personal Mobility Services customer 15 days after we send the customer a past due notice, restrict incoming calls and text messages received by a post-paid Personal Mobility Services customer 30 days after the restriction on outgoing calls and text messages is imposed, and cancel services to a post-paid Personal Mobility Services customer after 30 days after the restriction on incoming calls is imposed. The cancellation process thus comprises several stages, including customer notification regarding the referral of their delinquency to credit bureaus, before services to the post-paid Personal Mobility Services customer may be ultimately cancelled due tonon-payment. Notices range from text messages to active calls for negotiation with the customer. Our collection system enables us to access delinquent subscribers’ accounts according to their payment profile. This profile takes into consideration, among other things, the length of subscription, the outstanding balance of the account and the longest payment delays. We have also implemented an information tool to assist with account management that is designed to warn subscribers of high outstanding amounts due and unpaid.

Customers of ourpre-paid Personal Mobility Services can only use a paid service if they have enough active credits in their accounts to do so. In order to acquire credits, customers must recharge their SIM cards in one of our many points of sales. Services are charged directly from the customer’s accounts and are free ofbad-debt risk.

Competition

The Brazilian telecommunications industry is highly competitive. The competitive environment is significantly affected by key trends, including technological and service convergence, market consolidation and combined service offerings by service providers.

Residential Services

We are a leading provider of residential services in our fixed-line service areas. Based on information available from ANATEL, as of December 31, 2019, we had a market share of 48.4% of the total fixed lines in service in our service areas (including the number fixed lines provided to our B2B Services customers). Our principal competitors for fixed-line services in our service areas are Claro and Telefônica Brasil.

We face competition from other telecommunications services providers, particularly from mobile telecommunications services providers, which has led to traffic migration from fixed-line traffic to mobile traffic and the substitution of mobile services in place of fixed-line services.

In addition, we face competition from providers of cable television services, particularly Claro and Telefônica Brasil, which provide local fixed-line services and broadband services (in many areas at higher speeds than our offerings) to residential customers through their cable network in municipalities in our service areas that have the highest concentration of purchasing power.

Telefônica Brasil has been increasing its competitive activities through traditional fixed-line networks in our fixed-line service areas, expanding its fiber optic network in high-income residential areas and increasing its services tolow- andmedium-size businesses.

The decrease in interconnection rates has led to decreases in market prices for telecommunications services by enabling telecommunications service providers that use the local fixed-line networks of incumbent fixed-line providers, such as our company, to offer lower prices to their customers for fixed-line services, such as voice and broadband. Although regional broadband service providers do not have the same national footprint as our company, they have established networks in the regions in which they operate and often have a market share of approximately 15% of broadband customers.

The primary providers of subscription television services in the regions in which we provide Residential Services are SKY, which provides DTH services, and Claro, which provides DTH service under the “Claro TV” brand andPay-TV services using coaxial cable under the “Net” brand.

Personal Mobility Services

The mobile telecommunications services market in Brazil is characterized by intense competition among providers of mobile telecommunications services. We compete primarily with Telefônica Brasil, which markets its mobile services under the brand name “Vivo,” TIM and Claro, each of which provides services throughout Brazil. As of December 31, 2019, based on information available from ANATEL (which includes B2B Services subscribers), we had a market share of 16.2% of the total number of mobile subscribers in Brazil.

We believe that in the medium-term, personal mobility service providers in Brazil will experience increasing competition from OTT providers, as customers shift from mobile voice and SMS communications to internet-based voice and data communications through computers and smartphone or tablet applications such as WhatsApp, Viber and Skype.

B2B Services

The competitive landscape we face relating to the fixed-line and mobile services we provide to our B2B customers are similar to those relating to the fixed-line and mobile services we provide to our residential and personal mobility customers.

In recent years, there has been a shift among corporate and SME services providers toward value-added services. With the exception of theOi Mais Empresas application and web service, our value-added products and services for the SME segment are substantially similar to those offered by our competitors; and we rely on client service and customer satisfaction to maintain existing customers and attract new customers. Our principal competitors for both core and value-added services for SME and corporate customers are Claro, Telefônica Brasil and TIM, as well as smaller niche companies.

Technology

Our Brazilian networks are comprised of physical and logical infrastructures through which we provide fully integrated services, whether fixed-line or mobile, voice, data or image, thereby optimizing available resources. We monitor our networks remotely from our centralized national network operations center in Rio de Janeiro. Network operating and configuration platforms, located at the network operations center, perform failure monitoring, database and configuration management, security management and performance analysis for each network.

Access Networks

Our Brazilian access networks connect our customers to our aggregation and transportation networks. We have a large number of network access points, including twisted copper pair wires to residences and commercial buildings, fiber optic lines to residences and commercial buildings, wireless transmission equipment andWi-Fi hotspots. Our fixed-line networks are fully digitalized.

Voice and data signals that originate through fixed-line access points are routed through Multi-service Access Nodes (MSANs), or Subscriber Line Access Multiplexers (DSLAMs) to our aggregation and transportation networks. The analog voice signals are split from the data signals, which are transmitted using ADSL or very high bitrate digital subscriber line, or VDSL, technology, allowing us to offer broadband and analog voice on a single copper wire pair. Our network supports next generation ADSL and VDSL technologies. ADSL2+ allows data transmission at speeds of up to 20 Mbps downstream and 1 Mbps upstream. VDSL2 allows data transmission at speeds of up to 35 Mbps downstream and 3.5 Mbps upstream. As of December 31, 2019, approximately 91% of our fixed-line network supported ADSL2+ or VDSL2 and we provided ADSL2+ or VDSL2 services in approximately 4,700 municipalities.

We are engaged in a long-term program to upgrade portions of our fixed-line access networks with optical FTTH networks based on gigabit passive optical network, or GPON, technology to support our FTTH triple-play services. The implementation of this technology permits us to provide broadband with speeds up to 200 Mbps to residential customers and up to 1 Gbps to commercial customers. As of December 31, 2019, our FTTH network reached more than 4.6 million homes passed, and approximately 675,000 homes connected. We expect to reach more than eight million homes passed and an additional one million homes connected by the end of 2020.

Mobile devices access our GSM, or 2G, mobile networks on frequencies of 900 MHz/1800 MHz, our 3G mobile networks on frequencies of 2100 MHz and our 4G/4.5G mobile networks on frequencies of 1800 MHz/2600 MHz. Our 2G access points use General Packet Radio Service (GPRS), which allows speeds in the range of 115 kilobytes per second (kbps), and Enhanced Data Rates for Global Evolution, or EDGE, which allows speeds in the range of 230 kbps, to send and receive data signals. Our 3G access points use High Speed Packet Access, or HSPA, and HSPA+, which allows speeds in the range of 42.2 Mbps, to send and receive data signals. Our 4G access points use 10+10 MHz and 2x2 and 4x4 multiple-input multiple-output, or MIMO, depending on the site configuration, which allows speeds in the range of 75 Mbps (2x2 MIMO configuration sites) and 300 Mbps (4x4 MIMO and carrier aggregation configuration sites), to send and receive data signals. Although currently the majority of voice signals are sent and received through our 2G and 3G access points are routed to our aggregation networks, we are initiating Voice over LTE (VoLTE) that will enable 4G routes voice signal over 4G access points, allowing offering new type of services based on the IP Multimedia Subsystem, or IMS, platform. Our mobile networks have unique data core and are fully integrated with our fixed-line data networks.

In addition to these mobile access networks, we also operateWi-Fi hotspots in indoor public and commercial areas such as coffee shops, airports and shopping centers. Since 2012, we have provided outdoor urban wireless networks, including in the neighborhoods of Copacabana and Ipanema in the city of Rio de Janeiro. As of December 31, 2019, ourWi-Fi network consisted of more than two million hotspots with broadband access compatible with more than two million access points provided by Fon Wireless Ltd., or Fon, which allows our customers to access Fon lines worldwide.

Aggregation Networks

Voice and data signals sent through our access network are routed through our aggregation networks to digital switches which connect voice calls and route digital signals to their destinations. In the past, we used ATM protocol to transport digital signals through our access network fromnon-residential customers that required dedicated bandwidth to our switching stations. In response to changing customer needs, we converted elements of our network that use ATM and Synchronous Digital Hierarchy, or SDH, protocols which permit us to offer dedicated bandwidth to our customers to MPLS protocol, which supports IP and permits the creation of VPNs through our MetroEthernet networks. We now use MPLS—Transport Profile, orMPLS-TP, capable devices that have been designated to interface with our existing Metro Ethernet Network to increase the bandwidth of our networks to support our 4G network data traffic and replace our legacy SDH networks. In large metropolitan areas where the density of access point results in increased demand, we have deployed Metro Ethernet networks. Our Metro Ethernet andMPLS-TP networks are fully integrated to management systems and provide:

ethernet data services from 4 Mbps up to 1 Gbps forpoint-to-point and multipoint dedicated access;

ethernet access services from 4 Mbps up to 1 Gbps for IP access and MPLS/VPN access;

aggregation network services for ADSL2+ and VDSL2 platforms;

aggregation network services for GPON platforms; and

Dense Wavelength Division Multiplex, or DWDM, systems for services above 1Gbps to prevent overbooking our Metro Ethernet network.

Transportation Networks

We have a nationwide long-distance backbone, consisting of our optical fiber network that covers more than 2,275 municipalities, connecting the Federal District and all state capitals in Brazil. Our fiber network supports high capacity DWDM systems that can operate with up to 80 channels at 10, 100 and 200 Gbps. Our optical network is complemented by microwave links and satellite transport to reach smaller cities and towns.

In 2015, we completed the implementation of a new Optical Transport Network/DWDM, or OTN/DWDM network, with 100 Gbps links, that connect 11 state capitals, including São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Brasília and Belo Horizonte. This new OTN/DWDM network spreads over approximately 30,000 km of optical cables. In the first half of 2018, we completed the extension of the OTN/DWDM network, with 100 Gbps links, to an additional seven state capitals and spread over an additional 18,000 km of optical cables. This year, we expect to further extend our OTN/DWDM network, with 100 Gbps links, to reach 26 state capitals and spread over 65,400 km of optical cables. In addition, in 2019, we began to expand our OTN/DWDM network using 200 Gbps links, having deployed some routes using this technology, among them a route between the cities of Goiânia and Brasília. As demand increases, more expansions of our 200 Gbps network will be implemented and we will begin to replace our existing 100 Gbps links with 200 Gbps links where technically feasible.

We employ automatic traffic protection to improve the reliability of our network and increase its traffic capacity. The network is fully supervised and operated by management systems that allow rapid response to customer service requests and reduce the recovery time in case of failure.

We operate an internet backbone network and a fullyIP-routed network, which provides a backbone for all internet-dedicated services and VPN offerings through access routers, for customer aggregation, configured as single edge routers (i.e., offering various types of services aggregation over a single box), allowing us to reduce capital and operation expenses. Our internet backbone connects to the public internet via national peering links and international links that we maintain in the United States.

Our transportation network is directly interconnected to the national and international long-distance networks of all long-distance service providers operating in Regions I, II and III and all mobile services providers in Regions I, II and III.

IPTV Network

Through our FTTH network, we offered IPTV services in 86 cities in more than 20 states as of December 31, 2019. For subscribers of ourOi TV services, through our DTH or FTTH networks, we also offer OTT services, which provide customers with access to different content on different devices (mobile phones, tablets and computers).

Property, Plant and Equipment

As of December 31, 2019, the net book value of our property, plant and equipment was R$38,911 million. As of December 31, 2019, of the net book value of our property, plant and equipment, (1) transmission and other equipment, primarily data communication equipment, network systems and infrastructure (including alternating and direct current supply equipment) and motor-generator groups, represented 43.6%; (2) infrastructure, primarily consisting of metallic and fiber-optic cable networks and lines, underground ducts, posts and towers, represented 21.8%; (3) right of use – leases, primarily consisting of communications towers, real estate, stores, vehicles, and sites (physical spaces), represented 20.3%; (4) work in progress represented 5.5%; (5) buildings represented 3.9%; (6) automatic switching equipment, consisting of trunking and switching stations (including local, tandem and transit telephone exchanges), represented 2.6%; and (7) other fixed assets represented 2.2%.

All Brazilian property, plant and equipment that are essential in providing the services described in our fixed-line concession agreements are considered “reversible assets,” which means that, should our fixed-line concession agreements expire or terminate without being renewed, these assets will automatically revert to ANATEL. There are no other encumbrances that may affect the utilization of our property, plant and equipment. For more details, see note 16 to our audited consolidated financial statements included in this annual report.

Transmission and Other Equipment

We have a nationwide long-distance backbone, consisting of an optical fiber network that covers more than 2,275 municipalities, connecting the Federal District and all state capitals in Brazil. This fiber network supports high capacity DWDM systems that can operate with up to 80 channels at 10, 100 and 200 Gbps. We have implemented an OTN/DWDM network, with 100 Gbps links that connect 21 state capitals, including São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Brasília and Belo Horizonte, which spreads over approximately 48,000 km of optical cables. Our optical network is complemented by microwave links to reach smaller cities and towns.

Infrastructure

Our Brazilian access networks connect our customers to our aggregation and transportation networks. We have a large number of network access points, including twisted copper pair wires to residences and commercial buildings, fiber optic lines to residences and commercial buildings, wireless transmission equipment andWi-Fi hotspots. Our fixed-line networks are fully digitalized.

Voice and data signals sent through our access network are routed through our aggregation networks to digital switches which connect voice calls and route digital signals to their destinations. In the past, we used ATM protocol to transport digital signals through our access network fromnon-residential customers that required dedicated bandwidth to our switching stations. In response to changing customer needs, we converted elements of our network that use ATM and SDH protocols, which permit us to offer dedicated bandwidth to our customers, to MPLS protocol, which supports IP and permits the creation of VPNs through our Metro Ethernet networks. We now useMPLS-TP capable devices that have been designed to interface with our existing Metro Ethernet Network to increase the bandwidth of our networks to support our 4G network data traffic and replace our legacy SDH networks. In large metropolitan areas where the density of access point results in increased demand, we have deployed Metro Ethernet networks.

Automatic Switching Equipment

Voice and data signals that originate through fixed-line access points are routed through MSANs or DSLAMs to our aggregation and transportation networks. The analog voice signals are split from the data signals, which are transmitted using ADSL or VDSL technology, allowing us to offer broadband and analog voice on a single copper wire pair. As of December 31, 2019, approximately 91% of our fixed-line network supported ADSL2+ or VDSL2 and we provided ADSL2+ or VDSL2 services in approximately 4,700 municipalities.

Voice and data signals sent and received through our 2G, 3G and 4G access points are routed to our aggregation networks. Our mobile networks have unique data core and are fully integrated with our fixed-line data networks.

As of December 31, 2019:

our 4G mobile access networks consisted of 12,622 active radio base stations covering 1,018 municipalities, or 75% of the urban population of Brazil;

our 3G mobile access networks consisted of 10,350 active radio base stations covering 1,645 municipalities, or 82% of the urban population of Brazil; and

our 2G mobile access networks consisted of 14,019 active radio base stations covering 3,497 municipalities, or 94% of the urban population of Brazil.

In addition to our mobile access networks, we also operateWi-Fi hotspots in indoor public and commercial areas such as coffee shops, airports and shopping centers. As of December 31, 2019, ourWi-Fi network consisted of more than two million hotspots, with broadband access compatible with more than two million access points provided by Fon, which allows our customers to access Fon lines worldwide.

Buildings

In addition to our headquarters building and our centralized national network operations center in Rio de Janeiro, we own 7,998 buildings that are used to house switching equipment or to house regional and local sales and operations centers. Of these buildings, 7,768 are “reversible assets” under our fixed-line concession agreements.

Capital Expenditures and Work in Progress

During the year ended December 31, 2019, we modernized our core network, with a focus on infrastructure improvements and enhancing our customers’ experience, by making strategic investment decisions that allow us to do more with less and we invested in our FTTH network. As a result, we expanded our fiber optic backbone, which enhanced our data traffic capabilities for fixed and mobile networks, to keep up with the growing demand. In addition, our performance on ANATEL’s network quality metrics improved.

The following table sets forth our capital expenditures for the periods indicated.

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2019   2018   2017 
   (in millions ofreais) 

Data transmission equipment

  R$2,947   R$1,993   R$1,846 

Installation services and devices

   742    539    644 

Mobile network and systems

   905    820    602 

Voice transmission

   496    731    726 

Information technology services

   684    720    729 

Telecommunication services infrastructure

   429    500    496 

Buildings, improvements and furniture

   88    70    80 

Network management system equipment

   224    171    94 

Backbone transmission

   630    304    237 

Internet services equipment

           1 

Other

   668    229    174 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total capital expenditures

  R$7,813   R$6,077   R$5,629 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Our principal capital expenditures relate to a variety of projects designed to expand and upgrade our transmission networks, our broadband access networks (fixed and mobile), our service platforms (data, video and voice), our information technology systems and our telecommunications services infrastructure.

Data Transmission Equipment Programs

We are engaged in a long-term program to upgrade portions of our fixed-line access networks with optical fiber networks based on GPON. The implementation of this technology permits us to provide broadband with speeds up to 200 Mbps to residential customers and up to 1 Gbps to commercial customers.

In our access networks, we have been engaged in a program of deploying FTTH technology to support our “triple play” services, using a GPON network engineered to support IPTV, high speed internet (currently speeds up to 200 Mbps), and VoIP services.

We have acquired and installed data communications equipment to convert elements of our networks that used ATM and SDH protocols to MPLS protocol over optical fiber, which supports IP and permits the creation of VPNs through our Metro Ethernet networks. We also deployed an optical switching layer based on optical transport network technology in order to provide more efficient use of our DWDM capacity, fast restorations, and IP routers traffic offloading.

We have been implementing a new broadband data communications network architecture, which we refer to as the Single Edge project. This architecture enables Oi to offer access network services such as mobile, broadband, IPTV, and corporate customer links in a single platform, which eliminates the need for individual management of each type of access network, expedites the resolution of network problems and minimizes maintenance and operation costs.

In addition to expanding our IP backbone capacity, we are continuing to simplify our transport network architecture through the adoption of the single-edge concept, which means using one single router to join our commercial, mobile and residential functions that would otherwise require many specialized routers. We believe that this network simplification will reduce both capital and operational expenditures.

Mobile Services Network Programs

4G Network

We offer 4G services using LTE network technology and have been deploying our 4G network since 2012. In compliance with our obligations under our LTE authorizations, in 2016, we extended our LTE network to cities with over 100,000 inhabitants, adding 284 new cities to our LTE network, and in 2017, we extended our LTE network to cities with less than 100,000 inhabitants, adding 813 cities to our LTE network.

In 2018, we began deploying 4.5G services by using carrier aggregation with 1800 MHz spectrum refarming and MIMO 4x4 in 27 municipalities in the first phase of the project. It has allowed us to offer best user experience and aligning our network to main operators in Brazil.

3G Network

We have undertaken a project to upgrade a portion of our mobile networks to enable us to increase the capacity of our mobile network. We have deployed new radio base stations and transceivers to improve our 3G coverage and quality in areas we already serve, reducing the level of signal congestion in these areas, and to expand our 3G service to municipalities in Brazil to which we have not historically provided 3G service.

Voice Transmission Network Programs

We are engaged in a program of investing in new equipment for our switching stations to support next-generation networks, which we believe will permit us to offer new value-added services to our fixed-line customers. We believe that our investment in next-generation networks will:

assist us in meeting the increased demand for long distance traffic, both domestic and international, through the use of VoIP;

permit us to offer differentiated services, such as voice over broadband; and

significantly promotefixed-to-mobile convergence.

As part of this program, we have deployed an IMS core that will facilitate our convergent voice and broadband offerings. The IMS core not only provides control for the VoIP resource but also integrated access control and authentication for all services, significantly improving automation and speed for customer provisioning.

We have also undertaken a program of removing and replacing smaller switching stations and integrating these operations with other switching stations to promote efficiency in our operations.

Information Technology Services Programs

We are investing in the expansion of supply in our cloud computing services in data centers, particularly in the State of São Paulo, in order to support the growing demand from our corporate customers. Our cloud computing services enable us to provide our customers with integrated telecommunications and information technology solutions.

Telecommunications Services Infrastructure Programs

We are investing in several structural projects in order to improve and modernize our business support systems and operational support systems, or OSS, and consolidate duplicative systems resulting from integrating previously acquired companies, thereby optimizing our capital and operational expenditure investments. Based on the Telemanagement Forum frameworks and best practices, our main projects are unified customer relationship management; network provisioning services; order management; consolidation of network inventory; network planning, project and construction; network fault management; performance management; customer experience management; API management and digital self-care, among others.

One of the primary projects connected to the OSS is related to assurance and quality. In January 2017, we completed the transition from a network centric monitoring system to a customer-focused approach and thereby our network operations have migrated from network operations centers to service operations centers which provide more efficient and customer-based support.

In December 2016, we completed a project to improve fulfillment by speeding up service creation and provisioning, reducing costly human intervention and increasing overall customer quality of experience through automation of the fulfillment processes.

Intellectual Property

We hold several material intellectual property assets, including patents and trademarks registered with the Brazilian Patent and Trademark Office (Instituto Nacional de Propriedade Industrial), or BPTO. Our main trademark used in Brazil, “Oi,” is registered with the BPTO in several classes, which allows us to use this trademark in a variety of markets in which we operate, including in connection with our fixed-line, mobile and broadband services.

Operating Agreements

Fixed-Line and Mobile Tower Leases

We have entered into three operating lease agreements with owners of communications towers and rooftop antennae to lease space to install equipment related to the delivery of our Personal Mobility Services on an aggregate of approximately 4,850 communications towers and rooftop antennae. We have also entered into three operating lease agreements with owners of fixed-line communications towers to lease space to install equipment related to the delivery of our fixed-line services on an aggregate of approximately 6,400 fixed-line communications towers.

The monthly payments under two of our operating lease agreements for space on communications towers and rooftop antennae reflect a base rental amount specified in the agreement, adjusted annually during the first seven years of the lease by the greater of 6.5% or the positive variation of IPCA, and adjusted annually thereafter by the positive variation of IPCA. The monthly payments, under the remainder of the operating lease agreements, reflect a base rental amount specified in the agreement, adjusted annually by the positive variation of IPCA.

The operating lease agreements for space on communications towers and rooftop antennae have15-year terms expiring between December 2027 and June 2029 and are automatically renewable for successiveone-year periods. The operating lease agreements for space on fixed-line communications towers have20-year terms expiring between April 2033 and July 2033 and are renewable for additional20-year terms.

Infrastructure Sharing Agreements

4G Network

As of the date of this annual report, we are party to two Radio Access Network, or RAN, sharing agreements with other operators. RAN sharing enables operators to share the same physical network, thus reducing the deployment costs while maintaining all of the characteristics of an individual network with respect to our customers. RAN sharing makes use of 3GPP standard features, permitting full technical support. As a result, RAN sharing agreements allow us to reduce operating expenses and capital expenditures.

In November 2012, we entered into a memorandum of understanding with TIM under which we agreed to the joint use of elements of our 4G network under a RAN sharing model pursuant to which we have invested in (and provided TIM with access to) infrastructure in certain cities, while TIM has invested in (and provided us with access to) infrastructure in other cities. In late 2013, we and TIM extended this memorandum of understanding to additional cities and revised certain obligations of each party under the memorandum of understanding, which we refer to as the 2013 RAN Sharing Agreement. The 2013 RAN Sharing Agreement has a term of 15 years. Under the 2013 RAN Sharing Agreement, we offer 4G technology to over 80% of urban areas in all Brazilian capital cities and cities with over 500,000 inhabitants. In 2015, we expanded the 2013 RAN Sharing Agreement with TIM to cities with over 200,000 inhabitants, 133 municipalities covered by 4G technology, and we began a RAN sharing arrangement with Telefônica Brasil. In 2016, we expanded to cities with over 100,000 inhabitants, reaching 284 cities with 4G coverage. In 2017, we expanded to cities with less than 100,000 inhabitants, reaching 813 cities with 4G coverage. In 2018, we and TIM amended the 2013 RAN Sharing Agreement to update the technology covered by the agreement to permit infrastructure sharing in the 1800 MHz spectrum technology.

In June 2015, we entered into a memorandum of understanding under which we agreed to the joint use of elements of the 4G network under a RAN sharing model pursuant to which Oi, TIM, and Telefônica Brasil agreed to invest proportionally (50% Telefônica Brasil, 25% Oi and 25% TIM) in sites in certain cities based on each operators’ respective coverage obligations, which we refer to as the 2015 RAN Sharing Agreement. The 2015 RAN Sharing Agreement has a term of 12 years. In early 2016, ANATEL required the inclusion of additional clauses in the agreement allowing an additional operator to be added. This agreement covered 31 cities in 2015, 171 cities in 2016 and 427 cities in 2017.

Satellite Network and Leases

Residential Services

We have deployed a range of satellite-based services to comply with our public service obligations to the rural and remote areas of Brazil, including the Amazon rainforest region. These satellite services include internet access and access to corporate data applications. The satellite network comprises satellite earth stations located in less-populated rural areas, as well as hub stations in the cities of Brasília, Manaus, Belém, Rio de Janeiro, Porto Velho, Boa Vista, Macapá, Santarém, and Marabá. Our fiber optic backbone connects all these hub stations. The integration of the land-based segment of our satellite network allows us to provide fixed-line and mobile voice service to our subscribers in any location in our fixed-line service areas.

As of December 31, 2019, we leased transponders from our affiliate Hispamar Satélite S.A., or Hispamar, with:

43 MHz of capacity on the Amazonas 3 satellite in Ku band and 252 MHz of capacity on the Amazonas 2 satellite in Ku band to provide voice and data services to approximately 3,000 localities; and

580 MHz of capacity on the Amazonas 3 satellite in C band and 378 MHz of capacity on the Amazonas 2 satellite in C band to provide voice and data services to approximately 390 municipalities.

DTH Network

We provide our DTH services through satellite uplinks that receive, encode and transmit the television signals to satellite transponders through our own facilities in Barra da Tijuca near Rio de Janeiro.

As of December 31, 2019, we leased transponders to provide DTH services from SES New Skies with 1.5 GHz of capacity on theSES-6 satellite in Ku band.

Agreements for Network EquipmentFixed-Line Voice Services

Local fixed-line services include installation, monthly subscription, metered services, collect calls and Services

On July 20, 2018, we entered into an agreement with Huawei do Brasil Telecomunicações Ltda.supplemental local services. Metered services include local calls that originate and certain of its affiliates, or Huawei, underterminate within a single local area and calls between separate local areas within specified metropolitan regions, which we agreedrefer to makeas local calls. ANATEL has divided our fixed-line service areas into approximately 4,400 local areas.

Calls within Brazil that are not classified as local calls are classified as domestic long-distance calls. We provide domestic and international long-distance services for calls originating from fixed-line devices in our fixed-line service areas.

Under our concession agreements, we are required to offer two local fixed-line plans to users: the necessary effortsBasic Plan per Minute (Plano Básico de Minutos) and the Mandatory Alternative Service Plan (Plano Alternativo de Serviços de Oferta Obrigatória), to sign, within 90 days from the date of the agreement, the contracts to acquire equipment and services from Huawei to support the modernizationwhich a small percentage of our network technologies. We expect that the projects supported by this agreement will result in the expansionresidential customers subscribe. A large majority of our mobile telephone coverage and our fiber optic broadband capacity. These projects are designedresidential customers subscribe to modernize and consolidate our mobile network technologies, permitting our gradual use of our 2G and 3G frequencies to provide 4.5G services in all municipalities currently served by our mobile network and prepare our network for the implementation of 5G technology and Internet of Things (IoT) solutions. Under this agreement, we expect to acquire equipment and services from Huawei over the next five years.

Pharol Settlement Agreement

On January 8, 2019, Oi, Bratel and Pharol entered into a settlement agreement, or the Pharol Settlement Agreement, which provides, among other things, for the termination of all existing litigation involving Oi, Bratel and Pharol in Brazil and abroad. As a result of the Pharol Settlement Agreement, Oi, Bratel and Pharol filed motions requesting the suspension of all pending proceedings, suits and appeals in Brazil and Portugal involving Oi, Bratel and Pharol for 60 days or until the RJ Court confirms the Pharol Settlement Agreement, whichever occurs first.

Under the Pharol Settlement Agreement Oi is required to: (1) pay Bratel an amount in U.S. dollars corresponding to €25 million, which under the Pharol Settlement Agreement should be used by Pharol for the subscription of 85,721,774 common shares issued by Oi in the Cash Capital Increase; and (2) upon confirmation of the Pharol Settlement Agreement by the RJ Court, (i) transfer to Bratel 32,000,000 common shares and 1,800,000 preferred shares of Oi held in treasury, (ii) pay Pharol the annual fees related to certain obligations assumed by Oi with respect to proceedings of Pharol in Portugal, and (iii) in case of a sale of at least 50% of the shares of Unitel indirectly held by Oi, deposit into an escrow account an amount necessary to guarantee the payment of any potential liabilities of Pharol in tax proceedings whose chance of loss is assessed as possible or probable.

Under the Pharol Settlement Agreement, on February 8, 2019, the member designated by Oi was elected to Pharol’s Board of Directors.

On February 28, 2019, the RJ Court confirmed the Pharol Settlement Agreement by a decision published in the Official Gazette of the State of Rio de Janeiro on March 12, 2019. This decision became final on April 3, 2019. Since that date, in accordance with the Pharol Settlement Agreement, Oi has paid Bratel an amount in U.S. dollars corresponding to €25 million and transferred to Bratel 32,000,000 common shares and 1,800,000 preferred shares of Oi held in treasury.

Unitel Arbitration

On October 13, 2015, PT Ventures initiated an arbitration proceeding against the other Unitel shareholders as a result of the violation by those shareholdersone of a variety of provisionsalternative fixed-line plans that we offer, which are designed to meet our customers’ usage profiles, including our bundled services plans. We continually monitor customer usage profiles and preferences and periodically revise our alternative fixed-line plans and promotions in order to better service the needs of our residential customers.

Broadband Services

We offer fixed broadband services through xDSL technologies and FTTH, with speeds ranging from 1 megabit per second, or Mbps, to 200 Mbps. We offer broadband services to our residential customers as mostly part of bundled plans with our traditional fixed-line services. Customers pay a fixed monthly subscription fee, irrespective of their actual connection time to the internet.

As of December 31, 2019, our network covered 85.3% of the Unitel shareholders’ agreementmunicipalities in our fixed-line service areas, reaching a total of more than 3.6 million fixed broadband customers, and Angolan law, includingour national fiber network reached approximately 4.6 million homes through FTTH. As of December 31, 2019, we offered FTTH in 82 municipalities, an increase of 54 municipalities as compared to December 31, 2018. We continue to strategically invest in our broadband network in areas that we believe have the provisions entitling PT Ventures to nominate the majority of the members of the board of directors of Unitel, including its managing director,greatest potential for sales and the fact that the other Unitel shareholders caused Unitel not to pay dividends owed to PT Ventures, entered into self-interested transactions, and withheld information and clarifications on such payment and transactions.

On March 14, 2016, the other shareholders of Unitel initiated an arbitration proceeding against PT Ventures, claiming that Pharol’s sale of a minority interest in Africatel to our company in May 2014 constituted a breach of the Unitel shareholders’ agreement. PT Ventures disputed this interpretation of the relevant provisions of the Unitel shareholders’ agreement arguing that the relevant provisions of the Unitel shareholders’ agreement apply only to a transfer of Unitel shares by PT Ventures itself.

The arbitral tribunal was constituted on April 14, 2016. On May 19, 2016, the arbitration proceeding against PT Ventures initiated by the other Unitel shareholders was consolidated with the arbitration initiated by PT Ventures. The arbitral tribunal issued its final award on February 20, 2019.growth.

 

InAs with our traditional fixed-line services, we continually monitor customer usage profiles and preferences and periodically revise our broadband plans and promotions in order to better service the final award,needs of our residential customers, to encourage our existing broadband customers to migrate to plans offering higher speeds and to attract new customers to our broadband services.

Pay-TV Services

We deliverPay-TV services throughout our fixed-line service areas using our DTH satellite network. We also deliverPay-TV services through our fiber optic network (internet protocolPay-TV, or IPTV) in all the arbitral tribunal decided thatcities where we have deployed FTTH.

We offerPay-TV services to our residential customers as part of bundled plans with our traditional fixed-line services or on an a la carte basis. We offer several packages ofPay-TV channels at different price points and offer subscribers to each of these packages the other Unitel shareholders had repeatedly breachedoption to customize the shareholders’ agreement,package through the purchase of additional channels featuring films offered by HBO/Cinemax and that these breaches had resultedTelecine and sports offered by Futebol.

As with our traditional fixed-line services, we continually monitor customer usage profiles and preferences and periodically revise ourPay-TV plans and promotions in order to better service the needs of our residential customers and to attract new customers to ourPay-TV services.

Bundled Services

As an integrated telecommunications service provider, we focus a significant decreasepart of valueour marketing efforts on promoting our bundled services offerings, including through offers of PT Ventures’ stake in Unitel. The arbitral tribunal ordered the other Unitel shareholdersfree installation of fixed-line and broadband services, free modem andWi-Fi and access to jointlycertain smartphone applications free of charge. Our bundled services offerings for residential customers have focused on increasing our profitability by providing a more comprehensive mix of higher-value services to our customers. Our market research has shown that bundled offerings build customer loyalty and severally pay PT Ventures the amount of US$339.4 million correspondingserve to the loss of value of PT Ventures’ stake in Unitel, plus interest from February 20, 2019 at12-month U.S. dollar LIBOR +2%, compounded annually. The arbitral tribunal also ordered the other Unitel shareholdersreduce churn rates as compared to jointly and severally pay PT Ventures the amount of US$307 million corresponding to the damages arising from the other Unitel’s shareholders’ failure to ensure that PT Ventures received the same amount of dividends in foreign currency as the other Unitel foreign shareholder. This amount is subject to interest at an annual rate of 7%, starting at various dates in 2013.standalone services. In addition, the arbitral tribunal ordered the respondents to pay a substantial portion of PT Ventures’ legal feeswe believe that by developing unique, multi-product bundles with joint installation, integrated billing and costs and the administrative and arbitrators’ fees and expenses, in the aggregate net amount of approximately US$13 million. The arbitral tribunal also entirely dismissed the counterclaim and agreed with PT Ventures that the conditions for exercising the right of first refusal to acquire PT Ventures’ 25% shareholding in Unitel had not been triggered. For more information, see “Item 8. Financial Information—Legal Proceedings—Legal Proceedings Relating to Our Interest in Unitel.”

Merger of Copart 4 with and into Telemar and merger of Copart 5 with and into Oi

In January 2019, Copart 4 was merged with and into Telemar and in March 2019, Copart 5 was merged with and into Oi.

Repurchases of Preferred Shares over the B3

During February 2019,unified customer service, we repurchased a total of 1,800,000 Preferred Shares over the B3 at prices ranging between R$1.42 and R$1.44 per Preferred Share, for an aggregate purchase price of R$2.6 million.

Corporate Structure

The following chart presents our corporate structure and principal operating subsidiaries as of April 23, 2019. For a complete list of our subsidiaries, see Exhibit 8.01 to this annual report.

LOGO

(1)

Oi directly and indirectly owns 100% of equity stock of Serede Serviços de Rede S.A., as follows: 81.61% is held directly by Telemar, 17.51% is held directly by Oi and 0.88% is held directly by Oi Mobile.

(2)

Oi indirectly holds 100% of the equity stock of Brasil Telecom Comunicaçāo Multimedia Ltda., as follows: 99.99% is held directly by Oi Mobile and 0.01% is held directly by Telemar.

(3)

Oi indirectly holds 86% of the equity stock of Africatel Holdings B.V., through its wholly-owned subsidiary Africatel GmbH & Co KG. Samba Luxco S.à r.l. holds the remaining 14% of the equity stock of Africatel Holdings B.V.

(4)

Oi indirectly holds 100% of the equity stock of Paggo Acquirer Gestão de Meios de Pagamentos Ltda., as follows: 99.99% is held directly by Paggo Empreendimentos S.A. and 0.01% is held directly by Oi Mobile.

Our Servicesset ourselves apart from other service providers.

We provide the following services:offer a variety of bundled services, including ourOi Total portfolio, consisting of:

 

  

Residential Services throughout Brazil (other than in the State of SãOi Total Solução Paulo) consisting of local and long-distanceCompleta, our quadruple-play bundle that combines fixed-line voice, services, broadband services anddata,Pay-TV services under ourOi TV brand, primarily through direct to home (DTH) (a satellite technology) which we offer throughout Brazil.and mobile voice and data services;

 

Oi Total Conectado, ourtriple-pay bundle that combines fixed-line voice, broadband data and mobile voice and data services;

Oi Total Residencial, our residential bundle that combines fixed-line voice, broadband data andPay-TV;

Oi Total TV + Fixo, a bundle that combines fixed-line voice andPay-TV; and

Oi Total Play, a bundle that combines fixed-line voice, broadband access and OTT content (Oi Play).

Customers who subscribe to bundles receive price discounts and double the data allowance that we offer on an a la carte basis.

In addition toOi Total, we offer bundles for residential customers that subscribe to our IPTV service that include broadband subscriptions at speeds of up to 200 Mbps. Subscriptions to our IPTV packages are only available in areas in which we have deployed our FTTH network. Outside our FTTH network, we offerPay-TV services throughout our fixed-line service areas using our DTH satellite network.

Personal Mobility Services

Our Personal Mobility Services throughout Brazil consisting ofbusiness offerspre-paid and post-paid mobile voice and data telecommunicationscommunications plans:Oi Livre plans for thepre-paid market;Oi Mais plans for the post-paid market; andOi Mais Controle as a hybrid solution. Although we no longer offer new subscriptions for voice-only mobile services, as well as value-added services;we continue to provide services to customers that have subscribed to these legacy plans. Since our 3G and 4G networks offer greater capacity to meet the growing demand for data, we are focused on accelerating the migration of users from 2G to 3G and from 3G to 4G by encouraging sales of 3G/4G smartphones and by including more data allowances in our new mobile offers.

 

B2B Services throughout

Pre-Paid Plans

Pre-paid customers activate their cellular numbers through the purchase and installation of a SIM card in their mobile handsets. We offerpre-paid voice and data bundles through ourOi Livre portfolio. OurOi Livre portfolio includes a range ofall-net voice minutes for calls within Brazil consisting(including unlimited minutes through theOi Livre Ilimitado plans) and data allowances (ranging from 1 GB to 4 GB of 4G mobile data) for flat fees. Customers choose the amount of time they have to use their voice and data allowances, ranging from seven to 30 days. Using theMinha Oi application on their smartphones, customers can freely switch between their data and voice allowances depending on their individual needs using apre-determined exchange rate. Ourpre-paid customers are able to add credits to their accounts throughpoint-of-sale machines, ATMs, Apple and Android applications installed on their mobile devices such asMinha Oi andRecarga Oi using a credit card, our toll-free number or the purchase ofpre-paid cards at a variety of prices. These credits are valid for a fixed period of time following activation and can be extended when additional credits are purchased.

Post-Paid Plans

Customers of our fixed-linepost-paid plans are billed on a monthly basis for contracted services used during the previous month, in addition to any fees for special services. OurOi MaisDigital portfoliooffers unlimited text messages, unlimited minutes for calls to any operator in Brazil and two mobile data plans (8 GB and 50 GB) with no usage restrictions, plus no data traffic charge for major social networks and video to apps, which vary according to the data plan, and include, among others: YouTube, Netflix, Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp and Messenger. Customers can include up to four additional lines and manage or share their data plan through our self-serve application,Minha Oi. Our premium plan subscription also includesOi Play bundled with video streaming services. To increase our value proposition, in addition to mobile voice and data telecommunications services, broadbandwe bundle premium content and services including newspapers, magazines andPay-TVe-books.

Hybrid Plans

Our hybrid plans present strategic value for our company because they combine the advantages ofpre-paid offerings, such as the absence of bad debt and a favorable impact on working capital, with advantages of post-paid offerings, such as a heavier consumption profile and higher ARPUs. We improve our revenues and market share through the offer of hybrid plans by consolidating customer recharges in our hybrid plans’ SIM cards and by improving the mix of offerings to the post-paid market.

We offer theOi Mais Controle portfolio of plans for customers who wish to combine the cost savings of our post-paid plans with the self-imposed limits of ourpre-paid plans.Oi Mais Controle subscribers have similar benefits as theOi Mais customers, such as data packages with no usage restrictions, unlimited text messaging and unlimitedall-net voice minutes for calls within Brazil, combined with the ability ofOi Livre customers to freely switch between their data and voice allowances depending on their individual needs using apre-determined exchange rate using theMinha Oi application on their smartphones.

Value-Added Services

In 2019, we continued to accelerate our digital transformation process, which included restructuring our value-added services whichunder the following categories: (1) films and series; (2) education; (3) health; (4) written media; and (5) utilities. Within each category, we highlight the following value-added services:

Films and Series

Premium streaming services including HBO GO, FOX +, Telecine Play, Watch ESPN, Discovery Kids andColeção Oi.

Education

Busuu: a language learning application offering 11 languages and a social network for users;

Oi Para Aprender:a learning platform that provides a variety of courses and tips regarding languages, entrance examinations, job assessments, how to develop a home office business and software lessons, among others; and

Descomplica: a premium learning streaming platform that provides high quality courses focused on the Brazilian university entrance examination.

Health

BT FIT: an automated personal trainer service that provides a variety of courses and exercises and creates personalized training program for the user; and

Saúde UP: a service that offers health content, as well as discounts in a wide network of pharmacies, medical exams and medical consultations, as well as a nurse on call.

Written Media

Oi Revistas: a service that provides online and downloadable access to hundreds of magazines from renowned publishers such as Globo, Abril, Editora Três and others; and

Oi Jornais: a service that provides online and downloadable access to various newspapers, as well as real time news notifications.

Utilities

Oi Apps Club:a subscription-based marketplace for highly rated Android apps, Oi Apps Club provides customers unlimited access to download apps, charged to the customer’s Oi bill rather than a credit card;

Oi Games Pro: a multiplatform gaming experience that offers unlimited games on mobile phones as well as a new computer game per month;

Truecaller: a caller ID service with the ability to block undesired calls; and

Oi Segurança: a service that offers a variety of functionality, such as antivirus, backup, device locator and parental controls, among others.

Our value-added services are marketeddeveloped by third-party application or content providers and deliveredoffered to our customers.

B2B Services

In our B2B Services business, we serve SME, corporate and governmental customers and other telecommunications providers. We offer a variety of services to our SME, corporate and governmental customers, including our core fixed-line, broadband and mobile services, as well as our value-added services, advanced voice services and commercial data transmission services. For our corporate customers, we also offer information technology services, such as network management and security, storage, Smartcloud, anti-distributed denial of service andmachine-to-machine products, which enable communication between a product and its control center or database (such as a car and its GPS navigation system), in order to expand our revenue sources from corporate customers beyond voice services, increase customer loyalty and ensure greater revenue predictability. We also provide specialized wholesale services, consisting of data network services and facilities, interconnection, national and international voice traffic transit and roaming.

Services for SMEs

We offer SME services similar to those offered to our residential and personal mobility customers, including fixed-line and mobile voice services, and fixed-line and mobile broadband services. We also launched FTTH plans for SMEs. In addition, we offer SMEs:

advanced voice services, primarily 0800 (toll free) services, as well as voice portals where customers can participate in real-time chats and other interactive voice services;

dedicated internet connectivity and data network services; and

value-added services, such as help desk support that provides assistance for technical support issues, web services with hosting,e-mail tools and website builder and security applications.

In general, our sales team works with our SME customer to determine that customer’s telecommunications needs and negotiates a package of services and pricing structure that is best suited to its needs.

Services for Corporate Customers

We offer corporate customers all of the services offered to our SME customers. In addition, we provide a variety of customized, high-speed data transmission services through various technologies and means of access to corporate customers. Our principal data transmission services for corporate customers are:

we act as the internet service provider for our corporate customers, connecting their networks to the internet;

Dedicated Line Services (Serviços de Linhas Dedicadas), or SLD, under which we lease dedicated lines to corporate customers for use in private networks that link different corporate websites; and

IP services which consist of dedicated internet connection, as well as Virtual Private Network, or VPN, services that enable our customers to connect their private intranet and extranet networks to deliver videoconferencing, video/image transmission and multimedia applications.

We provide these services at data transmission speeds of 2 Mbps to 100 Gbps.

We also offer information technology infrastructure services to our corporate customers, seeking to offer themend-to-end solutions through which we are able to provide and manage their connectivity and information technology needs. For example, we offerOi SmartCloud, a suite of data processing and data storage services that we perform through our five cyber data centers located in Brasília, São Paulo, Curitiba and Porto Alegre. In addition, through these data centers, we provide hosting, collocation and IT outsourcing services, permitting our customers to outsource their IT infrastructures to us or to use these centers to provide backup for their IT systems.

We also offer the following five major service groups throughOi SmartCloud, which operate through our five cyber data centers:

collaborative solutions, a hosting and sharing platform that provides employees with access to company documents;

business applications, anin-memory computing platform for large amounts of data;

Oi GestãoMobilidade, a mobile device management service focused on providing logistics and security solutions relating to mobile devices;

Security services, a centralized, anti-spam filtering solution for corporate email; and

Telepresence as a Service (TPaaS), a video-conferencing service that allows collaboration among people at remote locations.

We also offer various services based on IT applications:

fleet management services, which provide a management system for fleet monitoring and location targeting, economies of scale for fuel costs, driver profile analysis and kilometer control for maintenance;

Interação Web, a digital marketing service, which allows us to implement on the website of our B2B Services customers an intelligent interaction with their digital users in real time;

workforce management, which provides a system with web and mobile applications to monitor and control the workforce in the field and optimize routes and control logistics activities; and

digital content management (corporate TV platform and queue management), which provides a digital signage platform with queue management solutions, creating a powerful marketing tool for companies that have interactions with customers at points of sale.

In order to provide complete solutions to our corporate clients, we have entered into service agreements for the joint supply of international data services with a number of important international data services providers. These commercial relationships with international data services providers are part of our strategy of offering telecommunications services packages to our customers.

Wholesale Services

We are the largest wholesale service provider in Brazil. We are responsible for providing services over the local access network and over the long distance network. Almost 2,000 service providers use our network to deliver services ranging from telephony and broadband to high-speed data connections for businesses of all sizes.

Our portfolio includes specialized services, consisting of data network services and facilities, interconnection, national and international voice traffic transit, roaming and infrastructure sharing.

Data Network Services and Facilities

We provide services referred to as industrial exploration of dedicated line (Exploração Industrial de Linha Dedicada), or EILD, pursuant to our concession agreement. The EILD consists of leased lines and clear channel protocols for the provision of services to third parties.

In addition, we are able to offer a complete portfolio of wholesale products, includingfiber-to-the-x, or FTTx, solutions, IP, Ethernet and Multi-Protocol Label Switching, or MPLS. All of these products are used to meet the demands of other network operators and regional internet providers. The circuits are requested with different service level agreements; and we are required to provide the facilities with contingency routes, sites and equipment to improve the service against points of failure.

Interconnection

As part of our wholesale services, we provide interconnection services wholesaleto users of other network usageproviders. The interconnection is a link between compatible telecommunications networks which permits that a fixed or mobile service user of one network can adequately communicate with the users of a network from another provider. All providers of telecommunication services (fixed or mobile) are required to provide interconnection upon request to any other telecommunication collective service provider. The interconnection agreements are negotiated according to the General Rules on Interconnection (Regulamento Geral de Interconexão), established by ANATEL.

Voice Traffic Transit

We offer national and international voice traffic transit that meets all our customers’ expectations and satisfies the dynamic needs of the telecommunications market. Direct interconnections with the major national and international telecommunication carriers, as well as most small carriers, ensure high-quality voice traffic transit in Brazil.

Roaming

We provide Global System for Mobile Communications, or GSM, roaming in Brazil to national and international mobile operators. Our roaming agreements enables mobile users to automatically make and receive voice calls, send and receive SMS as well as access internet service while traveling outside the geographical coverage area of their own home network by using our mobile network.

Marketing and Distribution

We focus our marketing efforts on the upselling to our existing clients while strengthening the “Oi” brand through our convergent services offerings and promotion of ourMinha Oi smartphone application, which allows ourpre-paid customers to freely switch between their data and voice allowances. We also engage in digital marketing and multiple customer relationship management (CRM) marketing programs to support our B2B Services business.

We strive to increase the visibility of our brand and provide a consistent branding message. In the year ended December 31, 2019, we adjusted our brand strategy and placed greater emphasis on marketing our fiber services and post-paid mobile packages. In addition, we developed a new strategy for addressing our corporate clients, which now focuses on providing products and infrastructure to address the needs of large corporations, including ACT solutions, outsourcing, and cybersecurity.

During the year ended December 31, 2019, we increased our investment in advertising, with a focus on digital advertising, with the goal of improving traffic transportationto our digital channels and generating sales in other channels. In addition to digital advertising, we used traditional advertising mediums, such as cable and network television and radio to increase our presence and the reach of our branding. In addition, we developed a detailed communications strategy to grow sales of our FTTH services.

To grow our customer base, we use proprietary media tools including telemarketing,e-mail and text messages. We also developed a branded content strategy, combining sponsorships of events, athletes and influencers to increase brand awareness and demonstrate our credibility.

Distribution Channels

We distribute our services through channels focused on three separate sectors of the telecommunications services market: (1) residential customers, including customers of our mobile services to whom we sell bundled plans; (2) personal mobility customers that purchase our mobile services independently of our bundled plans; and (3) business and corporate customers.

Residential Services

Our distribution channels for residential customers are focused on sales of fixed-line services, including voice, broadband services andOi TV, and post-paid mobile services. As of December 31, 2019, the principal distribution channels that we used for sales to residential customers were:

our own network of stores, which included 125 “Oi” branded stores;

508 “Oi” franchised service stores and kiosks located in the largest shopping malls and other high density areas throughout Brazil;

6,837 stores located throughout our service areas that primarily sell telecommunications products and services and have entered into exclusivity agreements with us;

our telemarketing sales channel, which is operated by our call center and other third-party agents and consists of 1,400 sales representatives that answer more than 314,000 calls per month. This channel provides us with the ability to proactively reach new customers, thereby increasing our client base and revenues, and also receives calls prompted by our offers made in numerous types of media;

our “teleagents” channel, which consists of 679 local sales agents that operate in specific regions and complement our telemarketers;

door-to-door sales calls made by our sales force of 2,537 salespeople trained to sell our services throughout Brazil in places where customers generally are primarily marketednot reachable by telemarketing; and delivered

oure-commerce sites through which customers may purchase a variety of our services.

Personal Mobility Services

Our distribution channels for personal mobility customers are focused on sales of mobile services to post-paid customers andpre-paid customers, including mobile broadband customers. As of December 31, 2019, the principal distribution channels that we used for sales of ourpre-paid Personal Mobility Services were:

our own network of stores, which included 175 “Oi” branded stores;

540 “Oi” franchised service stores and kiosks located in the largest shopping malls and other high density areas throughout Brazil;

524 stores that are part of large national chains that sell our post-paid andpre-paid Personal Mobility Services and SIM cards;

approximately nine multi-brand distributors that distribute our SIM cards andpre-paid mobile cards to approximately 280,000 pharmacies, supermarkets, newsstands and similar outlets;

our telemarketing sales channel has 1,832 sales representatives that answer more than 659,000 calls per month selling our post-paid personal mobility services; and

our website, through which ourpre-paid customers may recharge their SIM cards.

B2B Services

We have established separate distribution channels to serve SME and corporate customers. As of December 31, 2019, the principal distribution channels that we use to market our services to SMEs were:

Oi” exclusive agents with 1,057door-to-door sales consultants that are dedicated to understanding and addressing the communications needs of our existing and prospective SME customers;

our telemarketing sales channel, which consists of two agents that use sales representatives that are specifically trained to discuss the business needs of our prospective SME customers to make sales calls, as well as representatives in our call center and representatives at call centers under contract with us to receive calls from existing and prospective SME customers to sell services to new customers and promote higher-value and additional services to existing customers. In addition, our telemarketing channel utilizes customer retention representatives; and

our website and theOi Mais Empresas application.

We market our entire range of services to corporate customers (includingthrough our own direct sales force which meets with current and prospective corporate customers to discuss the business needs of these enterprises and design solutions intended to address their communications needs. Our client service model focuses on post-sale service and we regularly discuss service needs and improvements through calls and meetings with our customers. As of December 31, 2019, our corporate sales team, excluding post-sale service personnel, was composed of approximately 326 employees operating in 10 regional offices.

Rates, Billing and Collection

Rates

Our rates for certain services, including basic local fixed-line and domestic long-distance plans, interconnection, EILD and SLD services, are generally subject to regulation by ANATEL. Under our current authorizations, we are allowed to set prices for our mobile service plans, provided that such amounts do not exceed a specified inflation adjusted cap. The rates for other telecommunications providers).services, such as broadband services, IP services and frame relay services are market oriented but may still be subject to ANATEL regulation. Furthermore, the rates for DTH and IP TV services are not subject to ANATEL regulation.

For more information about the regulations applicable to our rates, see “—Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry.”

Billing and Collection

Residential Services

We send each of our Residential Services customers a monthly bill covering all the services provided during the prior monthly period. Customers are grouped in billing cycles based on the date their bills are issued. Each bill separately itemizes service packages, local calls, long-distance calls, calls terminating on a mobile network, toll-free services and other services such as call waiting, voicemail and call forwarding. Payments of Residential Services bills are due within an average of 15 days after the billing date. We charge late-payment interest at a rate of 1% per month plus aone-time late charge of 2% of the amount outstanding. We have agreements with several banks for the receipt and processing of payments from our Residential Services customers. A variety of businesses, such as lottery houses, drugstores and grocery stores, accept payments from our Residential Services customers as agents for these banks. As of December 31, 2019, 16.5% of all accounts receivable due from our Residential Services customers in Brazil were outstanding for more than 30 days and 13.5%, were outstanding for more than 90 days.

We are required to include in our monthly Residential Services bills charges incurred by our customers for long-distance services provided by other long-distance service providers upon the request of these providers. We have billing agreements with each long-distance telecommunications service provider that interconnects with our networks under which we bill our customers for any long-distance calls originated on our network that are carried by another long-distance service provider and transfer the balance to the relevant provider after deducting any access fees due for the use of our network.

ANATEL regulations permit us to restrict outgoing calls made by a Residential Services customer 15 days after we send the customer a past due notice, restrict incoming calls received by a Residential Services customer 30 days after the restriction on outgoing calls is imposed, and disconnect a Residential Services customer after 30 days after the restriction on incoming calls is imposed. The disconnection process thus comprises several stages, including customer notification regarding the referral of their delinquency to credit bureaus, before the Residential Services customer may be ultimately disconnected due tonon-payment. Notices range from voice messages to active calls for negotiation with the customer. Our collection system enables us to access delinquent subscribers’ accounts according to their payment profile. This profile takes into consideration, among other things, the length of subscription, the outstanding balance of the account and the longest payment delays.

Personal Mobility Services

We bill our post-paid Personal Mobility Services customers on a monthly basis and itemize charges in the same manner as we bill our Residential Services customers. In addition, the monthly bills also provide details regarding minutes used and roaming charges. Payments are due within an average of 15 days after the billing date. We charge late-payment interest at a rate of 1% per month plus aone-time late charge of 2% of the amount outstanding. As with our Residential Services business, we have agreements with several banks for the receipt and processing of payments from our post-paid Personal Mobility Services customers. A variety of businesses, such as lottery houses, drugstores and grocery stores, accept payments from our post-paid Personal Mobility Services customers as agents for these banks. As of December 31, 2019, 19.3% of all accounts receivable due from our Personal Mobility Services customers in Brazil were outstanding for more than 30 days, and 17.0% were outstanding for more than 90 days.

ANATEL regulations permit us to restrict outgoing calls made and text messages sent by a post-paid Personal Mobility Services customer 15 days after we send the customer a past due notice, restrict incoming calls and text messages received by a post-paid Personal Mobility Services customer 30 days after the restriction on outgoing calls and text messages is imposed, and cancel services to a post-paid Personal Mobility Services customer after 30 days after the restriction on incoming calls is imposed. The cancellation process thus comprises several stages, including customer notification regarding the referral of their delinquency to credit bureaus, before services to the post-paid Personal Mobility Services customer may be ultimately cancelled due tonon-payment. Notices range from text messages to active calls for negotiation with the customer. Our collection system enables us to access delinquent subscribers’ accounts according to their payment profile. This profile takes into consideration, among other things, the length of subscription, the outstanding balance of the account and the longest payment delays. We have also implemented an information tool to assist with account management that is designed to warn subscribers of high outstanding amounts due and unpaid.

Customers of ourpre-paid Personal Mobility Services can only use a paid service if they have enough active credits in their accounts to do so. In order to acquire credits, customers must recharge their SIM cards in one of our many points of sales. Services are charged directly from the customer’s accounts and are free ofbad-debt risk.

Competition

The Brazilian telecommunications industry is highly competitive. The competitive environment is significantly affected by key trends, including technological and service convergence, market consolidation and combined service offerings by service providers.

Residential Services

We offer ourare a leading provider of residential services in our fixed-line service areas. Based on information available from ANATEL, as bundles, including bundlesof December 31, 2019, we had a market share of 48.4% of the total fixed lines in service in our service areas (including the number fixed lines provided to our B2B Services customers). Our principal competitors for fixed-line services in our service areas are Claro and Telefônica Brasil.

We face competition from other telecommunications services providers, particularly from mobile telecommunications services providers, which has led to traffic migration from fixed-line traffic to mobile traffic and the substitution of mobile services in place of fixed-line services.

In addition, we face competition from providers of cable television services, particularly Claro and Telefônica Brasil, which provide local fixed-line services and broadband services (in many areas at higher speeds than our offerings) to residential customers through their cable network in municipalities in our service areas that have the highest concentration of purchasing power.

Telefônica Brasil has been increasing its competitive activities through traditional fixed-line networks in our fixed-line service areas, expanding its fiber optic network in high-income residential areas and increasing its services tolow- andmedium-size businesses.

The decrease in interconnection rates has led to decreases in market prices for telecommunications services by enabling telecommunications service providers that use the local fixed-line networks of incumbent fixed-line providers, such as our company, to offer lower prices to their customers for fixed-line services, such as voice and broadband. Although regional broadband service providers do not have the same national footprint as our company, they have established networks in the regions in which they operate and often have a market share of approximately 15% of broadband customers.

The primary providers of subscription television services in the regions in which we provide Residential Services are SKY, which provides DTH services, and Claro, which provides DTH service under the “Claro TV” brand andPay-TV services using coaxial cable under the “Net” brand.

Personal Mobility Services

The mobile telecommunications services market in Brazil is characterized by intense competition among providers of mobile telecommunications services. We compete primarily with otherTelefônica Brasil, which markets its mobile services including ourunder the brand name “Vivo,” TIM and Claro, each of which provides services throughout Brazil. As of December 31, 2019, based on information available from ANATEL (which includes B2B Services subscribers), we had a market share of 16.2% of the total number of mobile subscribers in Brazil.

We believe that in the medium-term, personal mobility service providers in Brazil will experience increasing competition from OTT providers, as customers shift from mobile voice and SMS communications to internet-based voice and data communications through computers and smartphone or tablet applications such as WhatsApp, Viber and Skype.

B2B Services

The competitive landscape we face relating to the fixed-line and mobile services we provide to our B2B customers are similar to those relating to the fixed-line and mobile services we provide to our residential and personal mobility customers.

In recent years, there has been a shift among corporate and SME services providers toward value-added services. With the exception of theOi Mais Empresas application and web service, our value-added products and services for the SME segment are substantially similar to those offered by our competitors; and we rely on client service and customer satisfaction to maintain existing customers and attract new customers. Our principal competitors for both core and value-added services for SME and corporate customers are Claro, Telefônica Brasil and TIM, as well as smaller niche companies.

Technology

Our Brazilian networks are comprised of physical and logical infrastructures through which we provide fully integrated services, whether fixed-line or mobile, voice, data or image, thereby optimizing available resources. We monitor our networks remotely from our centralized national network operations center in Rio de Janeiro. Network operating and configuration platforms, located at the network operations center, perform failure monitoring, database and configuration management, security management and performance analysis for each network.

Access Networks

Our Brazilian access networks connect our customers to our aggregation and transportation networks. We have a large number of network access points, including twisted copper pair wires to residences and commercial buildings, fiber optic lines to residences and commercial buildings, wireless transmission equipment andWi-Fi hotspots. Our fixed-line networks are fully digitalized.

Voice and data signals that originate through fixed-line access points are routed through Multi-service Access Nodes (MSANs), or Subscriber Line Access Multiplexers (DSLAMs) to our aggregation and transportation networks. The analog voice signals are split from the data signals, which are transmitted using ADSL or very high bitrate digital subscriber line, or VDSL, technology, allowing us to offer broadband and analog voice on a single copper wire pair. Our network supports next generation ADSL and VDSL technologies. ADSL2+ allows data transmission at speeds of up to 20 Mbps downstream and 1 Mbps upstream. VDSL2 allows data transmission at speeds of up to 35 Mbps downstream and 3.5 Mbps upstream. As of December 31, 2019, approximately 91% of our fixed-line network supported ADSL2+ or VDSL2 and we provided ADSL2+ or VDSL2 services in approximately 4,700 municipalities.

We are engaged in a long-term program to upgrade portions of our fixed-line access networks with optical FTTH networks based on gigabit passive optical network, or GPON, technology to support our FTTH triple-play services. The implementation of this technology permits us to provide broadband with speeds up to 200 Mbps to residential customers and up to 1 Gbps to commercial customers. As of December 31, 2019, our FTTH network reached more than 4.6 million homes passed, and approximately 675,000 homes connected. We expect to reach more than eight million homes passed and an additional one million homes connected by the end of 2020.

Mobile devices access our GSM, or 2G, mobile networks on frequencies of 900 MHz/1800 MHz, our 3G mobile networks on frequencies of 2100 MHz and our 4G/4.5G mobile networks on frequencies of 1800 MHz/2600 MHz. Our 2G access points use General Packet Radio Service (GPRS), which allows speeds in the range of 115 kilobytes per second (kbps), and Enhanced Data Rates for Global Evolution, or EDGE, which allows speeds in the range of 230 kbps, to send and receive data signals. Our 3G access points use High Speed Packet Access, or HSPA, and HSPA+, which allows speeds in the range of 42.2 Mbps, to send and receive data signals. Our 4G access points use 10+10 MHz and 2x2 and 4x4 multiple-input multiple-output, or MIMO, depending on the site configuration, which allows speeds in the range of 75 Mbps (2x2 MIMO configuration sites) and 300 Mbps (4x4 MIMO and carrier aggregation configuration sites), to send and receive data signals. Although currently the majority of voice signals are sent and received through our 2G and 3G access points are routed to our aggregation networks, we are initiating Voice over LTE (VoLTE) that will enable 4G routes voice signal over 4G access points, allowing offering new type of services based on the IP Multimedia Subsystem, or IMS, platform. Our mobile networks have unique data core and are fully integrated with our fixed-line data networks.

In addition to these mobile access networks, we also operateWi-Fi hotspots in indoor public and commercial areas such as coffee shops, airports and shopping centers. Since 2012, we have provided outdoor urban wireless networks, including in the neighborhoods of Copacabana and Ipanema in the city of Rio de Janeiro. As of December 31, 2019, ourWi-Fi network consisted of more than two million hotspots with broadband access compatible with more than two million access points provided by Fon Wireless Ltd., or Fon, which allows our customers to access Fon lines worldwide.

Aggregation Networks

Voice and data signals sent through our access network are routed through our aggregation networks to digital switches which connect voice calls and route digital signals to their destinations. In the past, we used ATM protocol to transport digital signals through our access network fromnon-residential customers that required dedicated bandwidth to our switching stations. In response to changing customer needs, we converted elements of our network that use ATM and Synchronous Digital Hierarchy, or SDH, protocols which permit us to offer dedicated bandwidth to our customers to MPLS protocol, which supports IP and permits the creation of VPNs through our MetroEthernet networks. We now use MPLS—Transport Profile, orMPLS-TP, capable devices that have been designated to interface with our existing Metro Ethernet Network to increase the bandwidth of our networks to support our 4G network data traffic and replace our legacy SDH networks. In large metropolitan areas where the density of access point results in increased demand, we have deployed Metro Ethernet networks. Our Metro Ethernet andMPLS-TP networks are fully integrated to management systems and provide:

ethernet data services from 4 Mbps up to 1 Gbps forpoint-to-point and multipoint dedicated access;

ethernet access services from 4 Mbps up to 1 Gbps for IP access and MPLS/VPN access;

aggregation network services for ADSL2+ and VDSL2 platforms;

aggregation network services for GPON platforms; and

Dense Wavelength Division Multiplex, or DWDM, systems for services above 1Gbps to prevent overbooking our Metro Ethernet network.

Transportation Networks

We have a nationwide long-distance backbone, consisting of our optical fiber network that covers more than 2,275 municipalities, connecting the Federal District and all state capitals in Brazil. Our fiber network supports high capacity DWDM systems that can operate with up to 80 channels at 10, 100 and 200 Gbps. Our optical network is complemented by microwave links and satellite transport to reach smaller cities and towns.

In 2015, we completed the implementation of a new Optical Transport Network/DWDM, or OTN/DWDM network, with 100 Gbps links, that connect 11 state capitals, including São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Brasília and Belo Horizonte. This new OTN/DWDM network spreads over approximately 30,000 km of optical cables. In the first half of 2018, we completed the extension of the OTN/DWDM network, with 100 Gbps links, to an additional seven state capitals and spread over an additional 18,000 km of optical cables. This year, we expect to further extend our OTN/DWDM network, with 100 Gbps links, to reach 26 state capitals and spread over 65,400 km of optical cables. In addition, in 2019, we began to expand our OTN/DWDM network using 200 Gbps links, having deployed some routes using this technology, among them a route between the cities of Goiânia and Brasília. As demand increases, more expansions of our 200 Gbps network will be implemented and we will begin to replace our existing 100 Gbps links with 200 Gbps links where technically feasible.

We employ automatic traffic protection to improve the reliability of our network and increase its traffic capacity. The network is fully supervised and operated by management systems that allow rapid response to customer service requests and reduce the recovery time in case of failure.

We operate an internet backbone network and a fullyIP-routed network, which provides a backbone for all internet-dedicated services and VPN offerings through access routers, for customer aggregation, configured as single edge routers (i.e., offering various types of services aggregation over a single box), allowing us to reduce capital and operation expenses. Our internet backbone connects to the public internet via national peering links and international links that we maintain in the United States.

Our transportation network is directly interconnected to the national and international long-distance networks of all long-distance service providers operating in Regions I, II and III and all mobile services providers in Regions I, II and III.

IPTV Network

Through our FTTH network, we offered IPTV services in 86 cities in more than 20 states as of December 31, 2019. For subscribers of ourOi TV services, through our DTH or FTTH networks, we also offer OTT services, which provide customers with access to different content on different devices (mobile phones, tablets and computers).

Property, Plant and Equipment

As of December 31, 2019, the net book value of our property, plant and equipment was R$38,911 million. As of December 31, 2019, of the net book value of our property, plant and equipment, (1) transmission and other equipment, primarily data communication equipment, network systems and infrastructure (including alternating and direct current supply equipment) and motor-generator groups, represented 43.6%; (2) infrastructure, primarily consisting of metallic and fiber-optic cable networks and lines, underground ducts, posts and towers, represented 21.8%; (3) right of use – leases, primarily consisting of communications towers, real estate, stores, vehicles, and sites (physical spaces), represented 20.3%; (4) work in progress represented 5.5%; (5) buildings represented 3.9%; (6) automatic switching equipment, consisting of trunking and switching stations (including local, tandem and transit telephone exchanges), represented 2.6%; and (7) other fixed assets represented 2.2%.

All Brazilian property, plant and equipment that are essential in providing the services described in our fixed-line concession agreements are considered “reversible assets,” which means that, should our fixed-line concession agreements expire or terminate without being renewed, these assets will automatically revert to ANATEL. There are no other encumbrances that may affect the utilization of our property, plant and equipment. For more details, see note 16 to our audited consolidated financial statements included in this annual report.

Transmission and Other Equipment

We have a nationwide long-distance backbone, consisting of an optical fiber network that covers more than 2,275 municipalities, connecting the Federal District and all state capitals in Brazil. This fiber network supports high capacity DWDM systems that can operate with up to 80 channels at 10, 100 and 200 Gbps. We have implemented an OTN/DWDM network, with 100 Gbps links that connect 21 state capitals, including São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Brasília and Belo Horizonte, which spreads over approximately 48,000 km of optical cables. Our optical network is complemented by microwave links to reach smaller cities and towns.

Infrastructure

Our Brazilian access networks connect our customers to our aggregation and transportation networks. We have a large number of network access points, including twisted copper pair wires to residences and commercial buildings, fiber optic lines to residences and commercial buildings, wireless transmission equipment andWi-Fi hotspots. Our fixed-line networks are fully digitalized.

Voice and data signals sent through our access network are routed through our aggregation networks to digital switches which connect voice calls and route digital signals to their destinations. In the past, we used ATM protocol to transport digital signals through our access network fromnon-residential customers that required dedicated bandwidth to our switching stations. In response to changing customer needs, we converted elements of our network that use ATM and SDH protocols, which permit us to offer dedicated bandwidth to our customers, to MPLS protocol, which supports IP and permits the creation of VPNs through our Metro Ethernet networks. We now useMPLS-TP capable devices that have been designed to interface with our existing Metro Ethernet Network to increase the bandwidth of our networks to support our 4G network data traffic and replace our legacy SDH networks. In large metropolitan areas where the density of access point results in increased demand, we have deployed Metro Ethernet networks.

Automatic Switching Equipment

Voice and data signals that originate through fixed-line access points are routed through MSANs or DSLAMs to our aggregation and transportation networks. The analog voice signals are split from the data signals, which are transmitted using ADSL or VDSL technology, allowing us to offer broadband and analog voice on a single copper wire pair. As of December 31, 2019, approximately 91% of our fixed-line network supported ADSL2+ or VDSL2 and we provided ADSL2+ or VDSL2 services in approximately 4,700 municipalities.

Voice and data signals sent and received through our 2G, 3G and 4G access points are routed to our aggregation networks. Our mobile networks have unique data core and are fully integrated with our fixed-line data networks.

As of December 31, 2019:

our 4G mobile access networks consisted of 12,622 active radio base stations covering 1,018 municipalities, or 75% of the urban population of Brazil;

our 3G mobile access networks consisted of 10,350 active radio base stations covering 1,645 municipalities, or 82% of the urban population of Brazil; and

our 2G mobile access networks consisted of 14,019 active radio base stations covering 3,497 municipalities, or 94% of the urban population of Brazil.

In addition to our mobile access networks, we also operateWi-Fi hotspots in indoor public and commercial areas such as coffee shops, airports and shopping centers. As of December 31, 2019, ourWi-Fi network consisted of more than two million hotspots, with broadband access compatible with more than two million access points provided by Fon, which allows our customers to access Fon lines worldwide.

Buildings

In addition to our headquarters building and our centralized national network operations center in Rio de Janeiro, we own 7,998 buildings that are used to house switching equipment or to house regional and local sales and operations centers. Of these buildings, 7,768 are “reversible assets” under our fixed-line concession agreements.

Capital Expenditures and Work in Progress

During the year ended December 31, 2019, we modernized our core network, with a focus on infrastructure improvements and enhancing our customers’ experience, by making strategic investment decisions that allow us to do more with less and we invested in our FTTH network. As a result, we expanded our fiber optic backbone, which enhanced our data traffic capabilities for fixed and mobile networks, to keep up with the growing demand. In addition, our performance on ANATEL’s network quality metrics improved.

The following table sets forth our capital expenditures for the periods indicated.

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2019   2018   2017 
   (in millions ofreais) 

Data transmission equipment

  R$2,947   R$1,993   R$1,846 

Installation services and devices

   742    539    644 

Mobile network and systems

   905    820    602 

Voice transmission

   496    731    726 

Information technology services

   684    720    729 

Telecommunication services infrastructure

   429    500    496 

Buildings, improvements and furniture

   88    70    80 

Network management system equipment

   224    171    94 

Backbone transmission

   630    304    237 

Internet services equipment

           1 

Other

   668    229    174 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total capital expenditures

  R$7,813   R$6,077   R$5,629 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Our principal capital expenditures relate to a variety of projects designed to expand and upgrade our transmission networks, our broadband access networks (fixed and mobile), our service platforms (data, video and voice), our information technology systems and our telecommunications services infrastructure.

Data Transmission Equipment Programs

We are engaged in a long-term program to upgrade portions of our fixed-line access networks with optical fiber networks based on GPON. The implementation of this technology permits us to provide broadband with speeds up to 200 Mbps to residential customers and up to 1 Gbps to commercial customers.

In our access networks, we have been engaged in a program of deploying FTTH technology to support our “triple play” services, using a GPON network engineered to support IPTV, high speed internet (currently speeds up to 200 Mbps), and VoIP services.

We have acquired and installed data communications equipment to convert elements of our networks that used ATM and SDH protocols to MPLS protocol over optical fiber, which supports IP and permits the creation of VPNs through our Metro Ethernet networks. We also deployed an optical switching layer based on optical transport network technology in order to provide more efficient use of our DWDM capacity, fast restorations, and IP routers traffic offloading.

We have been implementing a new broadband data communications network architecture, which we refer to as the Single Edge project. This architecture enables Oi to offer access network services such as mobile, broadband, IPTV, and corporate customer links in a single platform, which eliminates the need for individual management of each type of access network, expedites the resolution of network problems and minimizes maintenance and operation costs.

In addition to expanding our IP backbone capacity, we are continuing to simplify our transport network architecture through the adoption of the single-edge concept, which means using one single router to join our commercial, mobile and residential functions that would otherwise require many specialized routers. We believe that this network simplification will reduce both capital and operational expenditures.

Mobile Services Network Programs

4G Network

We offer 4G services using LTE network technology and have been deploying our 4G network since 2012. In compliance with our obligations under our LTE authorizations, in 2016, we extended our LTE network to cities with over 100,000 inhabitants, adding 284 new cities to our LTE network, and in 2017, we extended our LTE network to cities with less than 100,000 inhabitants, adding 813 cities to our LTE network.

In 2018, we began deploying 4.5G services by using carrier aggregation with 1800 MHz spectrum refarming and MIMO 4x4 in 27 municipalities in the first phase of the project. It has allowed us to offer best user experience and aligning our network to main operators in Brazil.

3G Network

We have undertaken a project to upgrade a portion of our mobile networks to enable us to increase the capacity of our mobile network. We have deployed new radio base stations and transceivers to improve our 3G coverage and quality in areas we already serve, reducing the level of signal congestion in these areas, and to expand our 3G service to municipalities in Brazil to which we have not historically provided 3G service.

Voice Transmission Network Programs

We are engaged in a program of investing in new equipment for our switching stations to support next-generation networks, which we believe will permit us to offer new value-added services to our fixed-line customers. We believe that our investment in next-generation networks will:

assist us in meeting the increased demand for long distance traffic, both domestic and international, through the use of VoIP;

permit us to offer differentiated services, such as voice over broadband; and

significantly promotefixed-to-mobile convergence.

As part of this program, we have deployed an IMS core that will facilitate our convergent voice and broadband offerings. The IMS core not only provides control for the VoIP resource but also integrated access control and authentication for all services, significantly improving automation and speed for customer provisioning.

We have also undertaken a program of removing and replacing smaller switching stations and integrating these operations with other switching stations to promote efficiency in our operations.

Information Technology Services Programs

We are investing in the expansion of supply in our cloud computing services in data centers, particularly in the State of São Paulo, in order to support the growing demand from our corporate customers. Our cloud computing services enable us to provide our customers with integrated telecommunications and information technology solutions.

Telecommunications Services Infrastructure Programs

We are investing in several structural projects in order to improve and modernize our business support systems and operational support systems, or OSS, and consolidate duplicative systems resulting from integrating previously acquired companies, thereby optimizing our capital and operational expenditure investments. Based on the Telemanagement Forum frameworks and best practices, our main projects are unified customer relationship management; network provisioning services; order management; consolidation of network inventory; network planning, project and construction; network fault management; performance management; customer experience management; API management and digital self-care, among others.

One of the primary projects connected to the OSS is related to assurance and quality. In January 2017, we completed the transition from a network centric monitoring system to a customer-focused approach and thereby our network operations have migrated from network operations centers to service operations centers which provide more efficient and customer-based support.

In December 2016, we completed a project to improve fulfillment by speeding up service creation and provisioning, reducing costly human intervention and increasing overall customer quality of experience through automation of the fulfillment processes.

Intellectual Property

We hold several material intellectual property assets, including patents and trademarks registered with the Brazilian Patent and Trademark Office (Instituto Nacional de Propriedade Industrial), or BPTO. Our main trademark used in Brazil, “Oi,” is registered with the BPTO in several classes, which allows us to use this trademark in a variety of markets in which we operate, including in connection with our fixed-line, mobile and broadband services.

Operating Agreements

Fixed-Line and Mobile Tower Leases

We have entered into three operating lease agreements with owners of communications towers and rooftop antennae to lease space to install equipment related to the delivery of our Personal Mobility Services on an aggregate of approximately 4,850 communications towers and rooftop antennae. We have also entered into three operating lease agreements with owners of fixed-line communications towers to lease space to install equipment related to the delivery of our fixed-line services on an aggregate of approximately 6,400 fixed-line communications towers.

The monthly payments under two of our operating lease agreements for space on communications towers and rooftop antennae reflect a la carte basis. Inbase rental amount specified in the Residential Services business,agreement, adjusted annually during the first seven years of the lease by the greater of 6.5% or the positive variation of IPCA, and adjusted annually thereafter by the positive variation of IPCA. The monthly payments, under the remainder of the operating lease agreements, reflect a base rental amount specified in the agreement, adjusted annually by the positive variation of IPCA.

The operating lease agreements for space on communications towers and rooftop antennae have15-year terms expiring between December 2027 and June 2029 and are automatically renewable for successiveone-year periods. The operating lease agreements for space on fixed-line communications towers have20-year terms expiring between April 2033 and July 2033 and are renewable for additional20-year terms.

Infrastructure Sharing Agreements

4G Network

As of the date of this annual report, we vieware party to two Radio Access Network, or RAN, sharing agreements with other operators. RAN sharing enables operators to share the household, rather thansame physical network, thus reducing the deployment costs while maintaining all of the characteristics of an individual network with respect to our customers. RAN sharing makes use of 3GPP standard features, permitting full technical support. As a result, RAN sharing agreements allow us to reduce operating expenses and capital expenditures.

In November 2012, we entered into a memorandum of understanding with TIM under which we agreed to the joint use of elements of our 4G network under a RAN sharing model pursuant to which we have invested in (and provided TIM with access to) infrastructure in certain cities, while TIM has invested in (and provided us with access to) infrastructure in other cities. In late 2013, we and TIM extended this memorandum of understanding to additional cities and revised certain obligations of each party under the memorandum of understanding, which we refer to as our customer,the 2013 RAN Sharing Agreement. The 2013 RAN Sharing Agreement has a term of 15 years. Under the 2013 RAN Sharing Agreement, we offer 4G technology to over 80% of urban areas in all Brazilian capital cities and our offerings, particularly our bundled offerings, are designedcities with over 500,000 inhabitants. In 2015, we expanded the 2013 RAN Sharing Agreement with TIM to meetcities with over 200,000 inhabitants, 133 municipalities covered by 4G technology, and we began a RAN sharing arrangement with Telefônica Brasil. In 2016, we expanded to cities with over 100,000 inhabitants, reaching 284 cities with 4G coverage. In 2017, we expanded to cities with less than 100,000 inhabitants, reaching 813 cities with 4G coverage. In 2018, we and TIM amended the needs2013 RAN Sharing Agreement to update the technology covered by the agreement to permit infrastructure sharing in the 1800 MHz spectrum technology.

In June 2015, we entered into a memorandum of understanding under which we agreed to the joint use of elements of the household4G network under a RAN sharing model pursuant to which Oi, TIM, and Telefônica Brasil agreed to invest proportionally (50% Telefônica Brasil, 25% Oi and 25% TIM) in sites in certain cities based on each operators’ respective coverage obligations, which we refer to as the 2015 RAN Sharing Agreement. The 2015 RAN Sharing Agreement has a whole.term of 12 years. In early 2016, ANATEL required the inclusion of additional clauses in the agreement allowing an additional operator to be added. This agreement covered 31 cities in 2015, 171 cities in 2016 and 427 cities in 2017.

Satellite Network and Leases

Residential Services

We have deployed a range of satellite-based services to comply with our public service obligations to the rural and remote areas of Brazil, including the Amazon rainforest region. These satellite services include internet access and access to corporate data applications. The satellite network comprises satellite earth stations located in less-populated rural areas, as well as hub stations in the cities of Brasília, Manaus, Belém, Rio de Janeiro, Porto Velho, Boa Vista, Macapá, Santarém, and Marabá. Our fiber optic backbone connects all these hub stations. The integration of the land-based segment of our satellite network allows us to provide fixed-line and mobile voice service to our subscribers in any location in our fixed-line service areas.

As of December 31, 2019, we leased transponders from our affiliate Hispamar Satélite S.A., or Hispamar, with:

43 MHz of capacity on the Amazonas 3 satellite in Ku band and 252 MHz of capacity on the Amazonas 2 satellite in Ku band to provide voice and data services to approximately 3,000 localities; and

580 MHz of capacity on the Amazonas 3 satellite in C band and 378 MHz of capacity on the Amazonas 2 satellite in C band to provide voice and data services to approximately 390 municipalities.

DTH Network

We provide our DTH services through satellite uplinks that receive, encode and transmit the television signals to satellite transponders through our own facilities in Barra da Tijuca near Rio de Janeiro.

As of December 31, 2019, we leased transponders to provide DTH services from SES New Skies with 1.5 GHz of capacity on theSES-6 satellite in Ku band.

Fixed-Line Voice Services

Local fixed-line services include installation, monthly subscription, metered services, collect calls and supplemental local services. Metered services include local calls that originate and terminate within a single local area and calls between separate local areas within specified metropolitan regions, which we refer to as local calls. ANATEL has divided our fixed-line service areas into approximately 4,400 local areas.

Calls within Brazil that are not classified as local calls are classified as domestic long-distance calls. We provide domestic and international long-distance services for calls originating from fixed-line devices in our fixed-line service areas.

Under our concession agreements, we are required to offer two local fixed-line plans to users: the Basic Plan per Minute (Plano Básico de Minutos) and the Mandatory Alternative Service Plan (Plano Alternativo de Serviços de Oferta Obrigatória), to which a small percentage of our residential customers subscribe. A large majority of our residential customers subscribe to one of a variety of alternative fixed-line plans that we offer, which are designed to meet our customers’ usage profiles, including our bundled services plans. We continually monitor customer usage profiles and preferences and periodically revise our alternative fixed-line plans and promotions in order to better service the needs of our residential customers.

Broadband Services

We offer fixed broadband services through xDSL technologies and fiber (FTTH –fiber-to-the-home),FTTH, with speeds ranging from 1 megabit per second, or Mbps, to 200 Mbps. We offer broadband services to our residential customers as mostly part of bundled plans with our traditional fixed-line services. Customers pay a fixed monthly subscription fee, irrespective of their actual connection time to the internet.

As of December 31, 2018,2019, our network we covered 85.3% of the municipalities in our fixed-line service areas, reaching a total of more than 5.23.6 million fixed broadband customers, and our national fiber network reached approximately 1.24.6 million homes through FTTH. As of December 31, 2018,2019, we offered FTTH in 3282 municipalities, an increase of 2254 municipalities as compared to December 31, 2017.2018. We continue to strategically invest in our broadband network in areas that we believe have the greatest potential for sales and growth.

As with our traditional fixed-line services, we continually monitor customer usage profiles and preferences and periodically revise our broadband plans and promotions in order to better service the needs of our residential customers, to encourage our existing broadband customers to migrate to plans offering higher speeds and to attract new customers to our broadband services.

Pay-TV Services

We deliverPay-TV services throughout our fixed-line service areas using our DTH satellite network. We also deliverPay-TV services through our fiber optic network (internet protocolPay-TV, or IPTV) in all of the cities where we have deployed FTTH.

We offerPay-TV services to our residential customers as part of bundled plans with our traditional fixed-line services or on an a la carte basis. We offer several packages ofPay-TV channels at different price points and offer subscribers to each of these packages the option to customize the package through the purchase of additional channels featuring films offered by HBO/Cinemax and Telecine and sports offered by Futebol.

As with our traditional fixed-line services, we continually monitor customer usage profiles and preferences and periodically revise ourPay-TV plans and promotions in order to better service the needs of our residential customers and to attract new customers to ourPay-TV services.

Bundled Services

As an integrated telecommunications service provider, we focus a significant part of our marketing efforts on promoting our bundled services offerings, including through offers of free installation of fixed-line and broadband services, free modem andWi-Fi and access to certain smartphone applications free of charge. Our bundled services offerings for residential customers have focused on increasing our profitability by providing a more comprehensive mix of higher-value services to our customers. Our market research has shown that bundled offerings build customer loyalty and serve to reduce churn rates as compared to standalone services. In addition, we believe that by developing unique, multi-product bundles with joint installation, integrated billing and unified customer service, we set ourselves apart from other service providers.

We offer a variety of bundled services, including ourOi Total portfolio, consisting of:

 

  

Oi Total Solução Completa, our quadruple-play bundle that combines fixed-line voice, broadband data,Pay-TV and mobile voice and data services;

 

  

Oi Total Conectado, ourtriple-pay bundle that combines fixed-line voice, broadband data and mobile voice and data services;

 

  

Oi Total Residencial, our residential bundle that combines fixed-line voice, broadband data andPay-TV;

 

  

Oi Total TV + Fixo, a bundle that combines fixed-line voice andPay-TV; and

 

  

Oi Total Play, a bundle that combines fixed-line voice, broadband access and OTT content (Oi Play).

Customers who subscribe to bundles receive price discounts and double the data allowance that we offer on an a la carte basis.

In addition toOi Total, we offer bundles for residential customers that subscribe to our IPTV service that include broadband subscriptions at speeds of up to 200 Mbps. Subscriptions to our IPTV packages are only available in areas in which we have deployed our FTTH network. Outside our FTTH network, we offerPay-TV services throughout our fixed-line service areas using our DTH satellite network.

Personal Mobility Services

Our Personal Mobility Services business offerspre-paid and post-paid mobile voice and data communications plans:Oi Livre plans for thepre-paid market;Oi Mais plans for the post-paid market; andOi Mais Controle as a hybrid solution. Although we no longer offer new subscriptions for voice-only mobile services, we continue to provide services to customers that have subscribed to these legacy plans. Since our 3G and 4G networks offer greater capacity to meet the growing demand for data, we are focused on accelerating the migration of users from 2G to 3G and from 3G to 4G by encouraging sales of 3G/4G smartphones and by including more data allowances in our new mobile offers.

Pre-Paid Plans

Pre-paid customers activate their cellular numbers through the purchase and installation of a SIM card in their mobile handsets. We offerpre-paid voice and data bundles through ourOi Livre portfolio. OurOi Livre portfolio includes a range ofall-net voice minutes for calls within Brazil (including unlimited minutes through theOi Livre Ilimitado plans) and data allowances (ranging from 500 MB1 GB to 7.64 GB of 4G mobile data) for flat fees. Customers choose the amount of time they have to use their voice and data allowances, ranging from oneseven to 30 days. Using theMinha Oi application on their smartphones, customers can freely switch between their data and voice allowances depending on their individual needs using apre-determined exchange rate. Ourpre-paid customers are able to add credits to their accounts throughpoint-of-sale machines, ATMs, Apple and Android applications installed on their mobile devices such asMinha Oi andRecarga Oi using a credit card, our toll-free number or the purchase ofpre-paid cards at a variety of prices. These credits are valid for a fixed period of time following activation and can be extended when additional credits are purchased.

Post-Paid Plans

Customers of our post-paid plans are billed on a monthly basis for contracted services used during the previous month, in addition to surplus usage andany fees for special services contracted and used and monthly subscription fees.services. OurOi MaisDigital portfoliooffers between 7unlimited text messages, unlimited minutes for calls to any operator in Brazil and two mobile data plans (8 GB and 50 GB of 4G mobile dataGB) with no usage restrictions, unlimited text messagesplus no data traffic charge for major social networks and unlimited minutesvideo to call fixed-lineapps, which vary according to the data plan, and mobile customers of any operatorinclude, among others: YouTube, Netflix, Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp and Messenger. Customers can include up to four additional lines and manage or share their data plan through our self-serve application,Minha Oi. Our premium plan subscription also includesOi Play bundled with video streaming services. To increase our value proposition, in Brazil. In addition to mobile voice and mobile data communications services, our post-paid plans provide voice mail, caller IDwe bundle premium content and other services including access to ourOi Playplatformnewspapers, magazines andWi-Fie-books. access points.

We offer a variety of post-paid mobile internet plans (i.e., data only plans) that provide data allowances from 3 GB to 50 GB for smartphones and from 2 GB to 10 GB for tablets and laptop computers and provide data transmission at speeds of 1 Mbps (3G network) or 5 Mbps (4G network). Our post-paid mobile internet plans for smartphones are available to ourOi Mais customers who wish to purchase additional data and to customers of our legacy post-paid stand-alone voice plans who wish to add mobile data services to their smartphones. Our post-paid mobile internet plans for tablets and laptop computers are sold on a stand-alone basis or, in some cases, as part of our voice and data plans. Subscribers to our post-paid mobile internet plans for smartphones, tablets and laptop computers also receive free access to our network ofWi-Fi hotspots.

Hybrid Plans

Our hybrid plans present strategic value for our company because they combine the advantages ofpre-paid offerings, such as the absence of bad debt and a favorable impact on working capital, with advantages of post-paid offerings, such as a heavier consumption profile and higher ARPUs. We improve our revenues and market share through the offer of hybrid plans by consolidating customer recharges in our hybrid plans’ SIM cards and by improving the mix of offerings to the post-paid market.

We offer theOi Mais Controle portfolio of plans for customers who wish to combine the cost savings of our post-paid plans with the self-imposed limits of ourpre-paid plans.Oi Mais Controle subscribers have similar benefits as theOi Mais customers, such as data packages with no usage restrictions, unlimited text messaging and unlimitedall-net voice minutes for calls within Brazil, combined with the ability ofOi Livre customers to freely switch between their data and voice allowances depending on their individual needs using apre-determined exchange rate using theMinha Oi application on their smartphones.

Value-Added Services

In 2018,2019, we continued to accelerate our digital transformation process, which included restructuring our value-added services under the following categories: (1) films and series; (2) education; (3) health; (4) written media; and (5) utilities. Within each category, we highlight the following value-added services:

Films and Series

 

  

Premium streaming services including HBO GO, FOX +, Telecine Play, Watch ESPN, Discovery Kids On andColeção Oi.

Education

 

  

Busuu: a language learning application offering 11 languages and a social network for users;

 

  

Oi Para Aprender:a learning platform that provides a variety of courses and tips regarding languages, entrance examinations, job assessments, how to develop a home office business and software lessons, among others; and

 

  

Oi Melhore sua RendaDescomplica: a servicepremium learning streaming platform that focusesprovides high quality courses focused on education and supplemental income generation and provides a variety of courses, including photography, party decoration, carpentry and crafts.the Brazilian university entrance examination.

Health

 

  

BT FIT: an automated personal trainer service that provides a variety of courses and exercises and creates personalized training program for the user; and

 

  

Saúde UP,: a service that offers health content, as well as discounts in a wide network of pharmacies, medical exams and medical consultations, as well as a nurse on call.

Written Media

 

  

Oi Revistas: a service that provides online and downloadable access to hundreds of magazines from renowned publishers such as Globo, Abril, Editora Três and others; and

 

  

Oi Jornais: a service that provides online and downloadable access to various newspapers, as well as real time news notifications.

Utilities

 

  

Oi Apps Club:a subscription-based marketplace for highly rated Android apps, Oi Apps Club provides customers unlimited access to download apps, charged to the customer’s Oi bill rather than a credit card;

 

  

Oi Games Pro: a multiplatform gaming experience that offers unlimited games on mobile phones as well as a new computer game per month;

 

  

Truecaller: a caller ID service with the ability to block undesired calls; and

 

  

Oi Segurança: a service that offers a variety of functionality, such as antivirus, backup, device locator and parental controls, among others.

Our value-added services are developed by third-party application or content providers and offered to our customers.

B2B Services

In our B2B Services business, we serve SME, corporate and governmental customers and other telecommunications providers. We offer a variety of services to our SME, corporate and governmental customers, including our core fixed-line, broadband and mobile services, as well as our value-added services, advanced voice services and commercial data transmission services. For our corporate customers, we also offer information technology services, such as network management and security, Storage,storage, Smartcloud, anti-distributed denial of service andmachine-to-machine products, which enable communication between a product and its control center or database (such as a car and its GPS navigation system), in order to expand our revenue sources from corporate customers beyond voice services, increase customer loyalty and ensure greater revenue predictability. We also provide specialized wholesale services, consisting of data network services and facilities, interconnection, national and international voice traffic transit A2P SMS termination and roaming.

Services for SMEs

We offer SME services similar to those offered to our residential and personal mobility customers, including fixed-line and mobile voice services, and fixed-line and mobile broadband services. We also launched FTTH plans for SMEs. In addition, we offer SMEs:

 

advanced voice services, primarily 0800 (toll free) services, as well as voice portals where customers can participate in real-time chats and other interactive voice services;

 

dedicated internet connectivity and data network services; and

 

value-added services, such as help desk support that provides assistance for technical support issues, web services with hosting,e-mail tools and website builder and security applications.

In general, our sales team works with our SME customer to determine that customer’s telecommunications needs and negotiates a package of services and pricing structure that is best suited to its needs.

Services for Corporate Customers

We offer corporate customers all of the services offered to our SME customers. In addition, we provide a variety of customized, high-speed data transmission services through various technologies and means of access to corporate customers. Our principal data transmission services for corporate customers are:

 

we act as the internet service provider for our Corporatecorporate customers, connecting their networks to the internet;

 

  

Dedicated Line Services (Serviços de Linhas Dedicadas), or SLD, under which we lease dedicated lines to corporate customers for use in private networks that link different corporate websites; and

 

IP services which consist of dedicated internet connection, as well as Virtual Private Network, or VPN, services that enable our customers to connect their private intranet and extranet networks to deliver videoconferencing, video/image transmission and multimedia applications.

We provide these services at data transmission speeds of 2 Mbps to 100 Gbps.

We also offer information technology infrastructure services to our corporate customers, seeking to offer themend-to-end solutions through which we are able to provide and manage their connectivity and information technology needs. For example, we offerOi SmartCloud, a suite of data processing and data storage services that we perform through our five cyber data centers located in Brasília, São Paulo, Curitiba and Porto Alegre. In addition, through these data centers, we provide hosting, collocation and IT outsourcing services, permitting our customers to outsource their IT infrastructures to us or to use these centers to provide backup for their IT systems.

We also offer the following fourfive major service groups throughOi SmartCloud, which operate through our five cyber data centers:

 

collaborative solutions, a hosting and sharing platform that provides employees with access to company documents;

 

business applications, anin-memory computing platform for large amounts of data;

 

  

Oi GestãoMobilidade, a mobile device management service focused on providing logistics and security solutions relating to mobile devices;

 

Security services, a centralized, anti-spam filtering solution for corporate email; and

 

Telepresence as a Service (TPaaS), a video-conferencing service that allows collaboration among people at remote locations.

We also offer various services based on IT applications:

 

fleet management services, which provide a management system for fleet monitoring and location targeting, economies of scale for fuel costs, driver profile analysis and kilometer control for maintenance;

 

  

Interação Web, a digital marketing service, which allows us to implement on the website of our B2B Services customers an intelligent interaction with their digital users in real time.time;

 

workforce management, which provides a system with web and mobile applications to monitor and control the workforce in the field and optimize routes and control logistics activities; and

 

digital content management (corporate TV platform and queue management), which provides a digital signage platform with queue management solutions, creating a powerful marketing tool for companies that have interactions with customers at points of sale.

In order to provide complete solutions to our corporate clients, we have entered into service agreements for the joint supply of international data services with a number of important international data services providers. These commercial relationships with international data services providers are part of our strategy of offering telecommunications services packages to our customers.

Wholesale Services

We are the largest wholesale service provider in Brazil. We are responsible for providing services over the local access network and over the long distance network. More than 4,000Almost 2,000 service providers use our network to deliver services ranging from telephony broadband and television for the home,broadband to high-speed data connections for businesses of all sizes.

Our portfolio includes specialized services, consisting of data network services and facilities, interconnection, national and international voice traffic transit, A2P SMS terminationroaming and roaming.infrastructure sharing.

Data Network Services and Facilities

We provide services referred to as industrial exploration of dedicated line (Exploração Industrial de Linha Dedicada), or EILD, pursuant to our concession agreement. The EILD consists of leased lines and clear channel protocols for the provision of services to third parties.

In addition, we are able to offer a complete portfolio of wholesale products, includingfiber-to-the-x, or FTTx, solutions, IP, Ethernet and Multi-Protocol Label Switching, or MPLS. All of these products are used to meet the demands of other network operators and regional internet providers. The circuits are requested with different service level agreements,agreements; and we are required to provide the facilities with contingency routes, sites and equipment to improve the service against points of failure.

Interconnection

As part of our wholesale services, we provide interconnection services to users of other network providers. The interconnection is a link between compatible telecommunications networks which permits that a fixed or mobile service user of one network can adequately communicate with the users of a network from another provider. All providers of telecommunication services (fixed or mobile) are required to provide interconnection upon request to any other telecommunication collective service provider. The interconnection agreements are negotiated according to the General Rules on Interconnection (Regulamento Geral de Interconexão), established by ANATEL.

Voice Traffic Transit

We offer national and international voice traffic transit that meetmeets all our customers’ expectations and satisfysatisfies the dynamic needs of the telecommunications market. Direct interconnections with the major national and international telecommunication carriers, as well as most small carriers, ensure high-quality voice traffic transit in Brazil.

A2P SMS termination

The A2P SMS refers to a short message communication between a business solution and a mobile subscriber. Our A2P SMS solution offers direct connectivity with Oi mobile subscribers and high quality delivery for enterprises and other transactional A2P traffic.

Roaming

We provide Global System for Mobile Communications, or GSM, roaming in Brazil to national and international mobile operators. Our roaming agreements enables mobile users to automatically make and receive voice calls, send and receive SMS as well as access internet service while traveling outside the geographical coverage area of their own home network by using our mobile network.

Marketing and Distribution

We focus our marketing efforts on the upscaling ofupselling to our existing clients while strengthening the “Oi” brand through our convergent services offerings and promotion of ourMinha Oi smartphone application, which allows ourpre-paid customers to freely switch between their data and voice allowances. We also engage in digital marketing and multiple customer relationship management (CRM) marketing programs to support our B2B Services business.

We strive to increase the visibility of our brand and provide a consistent branding message. In 2018,the year ended December 31, 2019, we adjusted our brand strategy and placed greater emphasis on marketing our fiber services and post-paid mobile packages. In addition, we developed a new strategy for addressing our corporate clients, which now focuses on providing products and infrastructure to address the needs of large corporations, including ACT solutions, outsourcing, and cybersecurity.

During the year ended December 31, 2019, we increased our investment in advertising, with a focus on digital advertising, with the aim to drivegoal of improving traffic to our digital channels and generating sales in other channels. In addition to digital advertising, we employedused traditional advertising strategies,mediums, such as television (freecable and cable), billboards, exterior signagenetwork television and radio to increase our advertising coverage,presence and leveragedthe reach of our ownedbranding. In addition, we developed a detailed communications strategy to grow sales of our FTTH services.

To grow our customer base, we use proprietary media such astools including telemarketing,e-mail and text messaging and other points of contact, to upscale our current base.messages. We also developed a branded content strategy, combining sponsorships of sporting events, athletes and individual athletes, as well as cultural events,influencers to increase brand awareness and promotedemonstrate our portfolio as a telecommunications provider capable of meeting all of the telecommunications needs of our customers. In 2019, we expect to continue to increase our investment in advertising in line with the advertising strategies described above.credibility.

Distribution Channels

We distribute our services through channels focused on three separate sectors of the telecommunications services market: (1) residential customers, including customers of our mobile services to whom we sell bundled plans; (2) personal mobility customers that purchase our mobile services independently of our bundled plans; and (3) business and corporate customers.

Residential Services

Our distribution channels for residential customers are focused on sales of fixed-line services, including voice, broadband services andOi TV, and post-paid mobile services. As of December 31, 2018,2019, the principal distribution channels that we used for sales to residential customers were:

 

  

our own network of stores, which included 135125Oi” branded stores;

 

  

573508Oi” franchised service stores and kiosks located in the largest shopping malls and other high density areas throughout Brazil;

 

approximately 6,7306,837 stores located throughout our service areas that primarily sell telecommunications products and services and have entered into exclusivity agreements with us;

 

our telemarketing sales channel, which is operated by our call center and other third-party agents and consists of 1,8771,400 sales representatives that answer more than 559 thousand314,000 calls per month. This channel provides us with the ability to proactively reach new customers, thereby increasing our client base and revenues, and also receives calls prompted by our offers made in numerous types of media;

 

our “teleagents” channel, which consists of 682679 local sales agents that operate in specific regions and complement our telemarketers;

 

door-to-door sales calls made by our sales force of 2,3732,537 salespeople trained to sell our services throughout Brazil in places where customers generally are not reachable by telemarketing; and

 

oure-commerce sites through which customers may purchase a variety of our services.

Personal Mobility Services

Our distribution channels for personal mobility customers are focused on sales of mobile services to post-paid customers andpre-paid customers, including mobile broadband customers. As of December 31, 2018,2019, the principal distribution channels that we used for sales of ourpre-paid personal mobility servicesPersonal Mobility Services were:

 

our own network of stores, which included 175 “Oi” branded stores;

540 “Oi” franchised service stores and kiosks located in the largest shopping malls and other high density areas throughout Brazil;

571524 stores that are part of large national chains whichthat sell our post-paid andpre-paid personal mobility servicesPersonal Mobility Services and SIM cards;

 

approximately 15 multibrandnine multi-brand distributors that distribute our SIM cards andpre-paid mobile cards to approximately 265,000280,000 pharmacies, supermarkets, newsstands and similar outlets;

 

our telemarketing sales channel has of 1,1371,832 sales representatives that answer more than 620 thousand659,000 calls per month selling our post-paid personal mobility services; and

 

our website, through which ourpre-paid customers may recharge their SIM cards.

B2B Services

We have established separate distribution channels to serve SME and corporate customers. As of December 31, 2018,2019, the principal distribution channels that we use to market our services to SMEs were:

 

  

Oi” exclusive agents with 1,057door-to-door sales consultants that are dedicated to understanding and addressing the communications needs of our existing and prospective SME customers;

 

our telemarketing sales channel, which consists of two agents that use sales representatives that are specifically trained to discuss the business needs of our prospective SME customers to make sales calls, as well as representatives in our call center and representatives at call centers under contract with us to receive calls from existing and prospective SME customers to sell services to new customers and promote higher-value and additional services to existing customers. In addition, our telemarketing channel utilizes customer retention representatives; and

 

  

our website and theOi Mais Empresas application.

We market our entire range of services to corporate customers through our own direct sales force which meets with current and prospective corporate customers to discuss the business needs of these enterprises and design solutions intended to address their communications needs. Our client service model focuses on post-sale service and we regularly discuss service needs and improvements through calls and meetings with our customers. As of December 31, 2018,2019, our corporate sales team, excluding post-sale service personnel, was composed of approximately 365326 employees operating in 1110 regional offices.

Rates, Billing and Collection

Rates

Our rates for certain services, including basic local fixed-line and domestic long-distance plans, interconnection, EILD and SLD services, are generally subject to regulation by ANATELANATEL. Under our current authorizations, we are allowed to set prices for our mobile service plans, provided that such amounts do not exceed a specified inflation adjusted cap. The rates for other telecommunications services, such as broadband services, IP services and frame relay services are market oriented but may still be subject to ANATEL regulation. Furthermore, the rates for DTH and IP TV services are not subject to ANATEL regulation.

For more information about the regulations applicable to our rates, see “—Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry.”

Billing and Collection

Residential Services

We send each of our Residential Services customers a monthly bill covering all the services provided during the prior monthly period. Customers are grouped in billing cycles based on the date their bills are issued. Each bill separately itemizes service packages, local calls, long-distance calls, calls terminating on a mobile network, toll-free services and other services such as call waiting, voicemail and call forwarding. Payments of Residential Services bills are due within an average of 15 days after the billing date. We charge late-payment interest at a rate of 1% per month plus aone-time late charge of 2% of the amount outstanding. We have agreements with several banks for the receipt and processing of payments from our Residential Services customers. A variety of businesses, such as lottery houses, drugstores and grocery stores, accept payments from our Residential Services customers as agents for these banks. As of December 31, 2018, 17.2%2019, 16.5% of all accounts receivable due from our Residential Services customers in Brazil were outstanding for more than 30 days and 12.1%13.5%, were outstanding for more than 90 days.

We are required to include in our monthly Residential Services bills charges incurred by our customers for long-distance services provided by other long-distance service providers upon the request of these providers. We have billing agreements with each long-distance telecommunications service provider that interconnects with our networks under which we bill our customers for any long-distance calls originated on our network that are carried by another long-distance service provider and transfer the balance to the relevant provider after deducting any access fees due for the use of our network.

ANATEL regulations permit us to restrict outgoing calls made by a Residential Services customer 15 days after we send the customer a past due notice, restrict incoming calls received by a Residential Services customer 30 days after the restriction on outgoing calls is imposed, and disconnect a Residential Services customer after 30 days after the restriction on incoming calls is imposed. The disconnection process thus comprises several stages, including customer notification regarding the referral of their delinquency to credit bureaus, before the Residential Services customer may be ultimately disconnected due tonon-payment. Notices range from voice messages to active calls for negotiation with the customer. Our collection system enables us to access delinquent subscribers’ accounts according to their payment profile. This profile takes into consideration, among other things, the length of subscription, the outstanding balance of the account and the longest payment delays.

Personal Mobility Services

We bill our post-paid Personal Mobility Services customers on a monthly basis and itemize charges in the same manner as we bill our Residential Services customers. In addition, the monthly bills also provide details regarding minutes used and roaming charges. Payments are due within an average of 15 days after the billing date. We charge late-payment interest at a rate of 1% per month plus aone-time late charge of 2% of the amount outstanding. As with our Residential Services business, we have agreements with several banks for the receipt and processing of payments from our post-paid Personal Mobility Services customers. A variety of businesses, such as lottery houses, drugstores and grocery stores, accept payments from our post-paid Personal Mobility Services customers as agents for these banks. As of December 31, 2018, 17.7%2019, 19.3% of all accounts receivable due from our Personal Mobility Services customers in Brazil were outstanding for more than 30 days, and 15.7%17.0% were outstanding for more than 90 days.

ANATEL regulations permit us to restrict outgoing calls made and text messages sent by a post-paid Personal Mobility Services customer 15 days after we send the customer a past due notice, restrict incoming calls and text messages received by a post-paid Personal Mobility Services customer 30 days after the restriction on outgoing calls and text messages is imposed, and cancel services to a post-paid Personal Mobility Services customer after 30 days after the restriction on incoming calls is imposed. The cancellation process thus comprises several stages, including customer notification regarding the referral of their delinquency to credit bureaus, before services to the post-paid Personal Mobility Services customer may be ultimately cancelled due tonon-payment. Notices range from text messages to active calls for negotiation with the customer. Our collection system enables us to access delinquent subscribers’ accounts according to their payment profile. This profile takes into consideration, among other things, the length of subscription, the outstanding balance of the account and the longest payment delays. We have also implemented an information tool to assist with account management that is designed to warn subscribers of high outstanding amounts due and unpaid.

Customers of ourpre-paid Personal Mobility Services can only use a paid service if they have enough active credits in their accounts to do so. In order to acquire credits, customers must recharge their SIM cards in one of our many points of sales. Services are charged directly from the customer´scustomer’s accounts and are free ofbad-debt risk.

Competition

The Brazilian telecommunications industry is highly competitive. The competitive environment is significantly affected by key trends, including technological and service convergence, market consolidation and combined service offerings by service providers.

Residential Services

We are thea leading provider of residential services in our fixed-line service areas. Based on information available from ANATEL, as of December 31, 2018,2019, we had a market share of 51.1%48.4% of the total fixed lines in service in our service areas (including the number fixed lines provided to our B2B Services customers). Our principal competitors for fixed-line services in our service areas are Claro and Telefônica Brasil.

We face competition from other telecommunications services providers, particularly from mobile telecommunications services providers, which has led to traffic migration from fixed-line traffic to mobile traffic and the substitution of mobile services in place of fixed-line services.

In addition, we face competition from providers of cable television services, particularly Claro and Telefônica Brasil, which provide local fixed-line services and broadband services (in many areas at higher speeds than our offerings) to residential customers through their cable network in in municipalities in our service areas that have the highest concentration of purchasing power.

Telefônica Brasil has been increasing its competitive activities through traditional fixed-line networks in our fixed-line service areas, expanding its fiber optic network in high-income residential areas and increasing its services tolow- andmedium-size businesses.

The decrease in interconnection rates has led to decreases in market prices for telecommunications services by enabling telecommunications service providers that use the local fixed-line networks of incumbent fixed-line providers, such as our company, to offer lower prices to their customers for fixed-line services, such as voice and broadband. Although regional broadband service providers do not have the same national footprint as our company, they have established networks in the regions in which they operate and often have a market share of approximately 15% of broadband customers.

The primary providers of subscription television services in the regions in which we provide Residential Services are SKY, which provides DTH services, and Claro, which provides DTH service under the “Claro TV” brand andPay-TV services using coaxial cable under the “Net” brand.

Personal Mobility Services

The mobile telecommunications services market in Brazil is characterized by intense competition among providers of mobile telecommunications services. We compete primarily with Telefônica Brasil, which markets its mobile services under the brand name “Vivo,” TIM and Claro, each of which provides services throughout Brazil. As of December 31, 2018,2019, based on information available from ANATEL (which includes B2B Services subscribers), we had a market share of 16.5%16.2% of the total number of mobile subscribers in Brazil.

We believe that in the medium-term, personal mobility service providers in Brazil will experience increasing competition from OTT providers, as customers shift from mobile voice and SMS communications to internet-based voice and data communications through computers and smartphone or tablet applications such as WhatsApp, Viber and Skype.

B2B Services

The competitive landscape which we face relating to the fixed-line and mobile services we provide to our B2B customers are similar to those relating to the fixed-line and mobile services we provide to our residential and personal mobility customers.

In recent years, there has been a shift among corporate and SME services providers toward value-added services. With the exception of theOi Mais Empresas appapplication and web service, our value-added products and services for the SME segment are substantially similar to those offered by our competitors,competitors; and we rely on client service and customer satisfaction to maintain existing customers and attract new customers. Our principal competitors for both core and value-added services for SME and corporate customers are Claro, Telefônica Brasil and TIM, as well as smaller niche companies.

Technology

Our Brazilian networks are comprised of physical and logical infrastructures through which we provide fully-integratedfully integrated services, whether fixed-line or mobile, voice, data or image, thereby optimizing available resources. We monitor our networks remotely from our centralized national network operations center in Rio de Janeiro. Network operating and configuration platforms, located at the network operations center, perform failure monitoring, database and configuration management, security management and performance analysis for each network.

Access Networks

Our Brazilian access networks connect our customers to our signal aggregation and transportation networks. We have a large number of network access points, including twisted copper pair wires to residences and commercial buildings, fiber optic lines to residences and commercial buildings, wireless transmission equipment andWi-Fi hotspots. Our fixed-line networks are fully digitalized.

Voice and data signals that originate through fixed-line access points are routed through Multi-service Access Nodes (MSANs), or Subscriber Line Access MultiplexerMultiplexers (DSLAMs), to our aggregation and transportation networks. The analog voice signals are split from the data signals, which are transmitted using ADSL or very high bitrate digital subscriber line, or VDSL, technology. We are engaged in a long-term programtechnology, allowing us to update our DSLAM equipment as demand for data services increases. As of each of September 30, 2018offer broadband and December 31, 2017, approximately 93% of our fixed-line network was operating with support ADSL2+ or VDSL2 and we provided ADSL or VDSL2 services in approximately 4,700 municipalities.

ADSL technology allows high-speed transmission ofanalog voice and data signals on a single copper wire pair for access to the network. Since voice transmission through telephone lines uses only one of many available frequency bands, the remaining frequency bands are available for data transmission.pair. Our network supports ADSL2+next generation ADSL and VDSL2, or very-high-bitrate digital subscriber line,VDSL technologies. ADSL2+ is a data communications technology that allows data transmission at speeds of up to 2420 Mbps downstream and 1 Mbps upstream, which is much faster thanupstream. VDSL2 allows data transmission through conventional ADSL. ADSL2+ permits us to offer a wider rangeat speeds of services than ADSL. VDSL2 is a DSL technology providing faster data transmission, using technologies such as vectoring and bonding it is possible to reach higher throughput up to 60035 Mbps (downstreamdownstream and upstream), permitting us to support applications such as HD Video, VoIP3.5 Mbps upstream. As of December 31, 2019, approximately 91% of our fixed-line network supported ADSL2+ or VDSL2 and broadband internet access, over a single connection.we provided ADSL2+ or VDSL2 services in approximately 4,700 municipalities.

We are engaged in a long-term program to upgrade portions of our fixed-line access networks with optical fiber to the home, or FTTH networks based on gigabit passive optical network, or GPON, technology to support our FTTH triple playtriple-play services. The implementation of this technology permits us to provide broadband with speeds up to 200 Mbps to residential customers and up to 1 Gbps to commercial customers. Our GPONAs of December 31, 2019, our FTTH network currently reachesreached more than 1.54.6 million homes passed, and weapproximately 675,000 homes connected. We expect to reach more than 500 thousand customerseight million homes passed and an additional one million homes connected by the end of 2019.2020.

Mobile devices access our GSM, (Global System for Mobile Communications), or 2G, mobile networks on frequencies of 900 MHz/1800 MHz, our 3G mobile networks on frequencies of 2100 MHz and our 4G4G/4.5G mobile networks on frequencies of 1800 MHz/2600 MHz. Our 2G access points use General Packet Radio Service or GPRS,(GPRS), which allows speeds in the range of 115 kilobytes per second (kbps), and Enhanced Data Rates for Global Evolution, or EDGE, which allows speeds in the range of 230 kbps, to send and receive data signals. Our 3G access points use High Speed Packet Access, or HSPA, and HSPA+, which allows speeds in the range of 14.242.2 Mbps, to send and receive data signals. Our 4G access points use 10+10 MHz and 2x2 and 4x4 Multiple Input Multiple Output,multiple-input multiple-output, or MIMO, depending on the site configuration, which allows speeds in the range of 75 Mbps (2x2 MIMO configuration sites) and 300 Mbps (4x4 MIMO and Carrier Aggregationcarrier aggregation configuration sites), to send and receive data signals. Although currently the majority of voice signals are sent and received through our 2G and 3G access points are routed to our aggregation networks, we are initiating VoLTE (VoiceVoice over LTE)LTE (VoLTE) that will enable 4G routes voice signal over 4G access points, allowing offering new type of services based on IMS (IPthe IP Multimedia Subsystem)Subsystem, or IMS, platform. Our mobile networks have unique data core and are fully integrated with our fixed-line data networks.

In addition to these mobile access networks, we also operateWi-Fi hotspots in indoor public and commercial areas such as coffee shops, airports and shopping centers. Since 2012, we have provided outdoor urban wireless networks, including in the neighborhoods of Copacabana and Ipanema in the city of Rio de Janeiro. As of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017,2019, ourWi-Fi network consisted of more than 1.6two million and 1.5 million hotspots respectively, with broadband access compatible with more than 1.6 and 1.5two million access points respectively, provided by Fon Wireless Ltd., or Fon, which allows our customers to access Fon lines worldwide.

Aggregation Networks

Voice and data signals sent through our access network are routed through our aggregation networks to digital switches which connect voice calls and route digital signals to their destinations. Portions of our aggregation network use conventional copper trunk linesIn the past, we used ATM protocol to connecttransport digital signals through our access network fromnon-residential customers that required dedicated bandwidth to our switches and transportation networks. For a small portionswitching stations. In response to changing customer needs, we converted elements of our aggregation network we stillthat use ATM and Synchronous Digital Hierarchy, or SDH, protocols which permit us to offer dedicated bandwidth to our customers to MPLS protocol, which supports IP and permits the creation of VPNs through our MetroEthernet networks. We now use MPLS—Transport Profile, orMPLS-TP, capable devices that have been designated to permit high speed transmission of these signals. Other portionsinterface with our existing Metro Ethernet Network to increase the bandwidth of our aggregationnetworks to support our 4G network use fiber optic cable to connectdata traffic and replace our access network to our switches and transportation networks usinglegacy SDH protocol.networks. In large metropolitan areas where the density of access point results in increased demand, we have deployed Metro Ethernet networks. Our Metro Ethernet andMPLS-TPnetworks are fully-integratedfully integrated to management systems and provide:

 

ethernet data services from 4 Mbps up to 1 Gbps forpoint-to-point and multipoint dedicated access;

 

ethernet access services from 4 Mbps up to 1 Gbps for IP access and MPLS/VPN access;

 

aggregation network services for ADSL2+ and VDSL2 platforms;

 

aggregation network services for GPON platforms; and

 

Dense Wavelength Division Multiplex, or DWDM, systems for services above 1Gbps to prevent overbooking our Metro Ethernet network.

In the past,we used ATM protocol to transport digital signals through our access network fromnon-residential customers that require dedicated bandwidth to our switching stations. In response to changing customer needs, we converted elements of our network that use ATM and SDH protocols, that permit us to offer dedicated bandwidth to our customers, to MPLS protocol, which supports IP and permits the creation of VPNs through our MetroEthernet networks. We now useMPLS-TP capable devices that have been designed to interface with our existing Metro Ethernet Network to increase the bandwidth of our networks to support our 4G network data traffic and replace our legacy SDH networks.

Transportation Networks

We have a nationwide long-distance backbone, consisting of anour optical fiber network that covers more than 2,2592,275 municipalities, connecting the Federal District and all state capitals in Brazil. ThisOur fiber network supports high capacity DWDM systems that can operate with up to 80 channels at 10, 100 and 200 Gbps. Our optical network is complemented by microwave links and satellite transport to reach smaller cities and towns.

In 2015, we completed the implementation of a new Optical Transport Network/DWDM, or OTN/DWDM network, with 100 Gbps links, that connect 11 state capitals, including São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Brasília and Belo Horizonte. This new OTN/DWDM network spreads over approximately 30,000 km of optical cables. In the first half of 2018, we completed the extension of the OTN/DWDM network, with 100 Gbps links, to an additional seven state capitals and spread over an additional 18,000 km of optical cables. Between 2019 and 2021,This year, we expect to further extend our OTN/DWDM network, with 100 Gbps links, to reach 26 state capitals and spread over 65,400 km of optical cables. In addition, in 2019, we began to expand our OTN/DWDM network using 200 Gbps links, having deployed some routes using this technology, among them a route between the cities of Goiânia and Brasília. As demand increases, more expansions of our 200 Gbps network will be implemented and we will begin to replace our existing 100 Gbps links with 200 Gbps links where technically feasible.

We employ automatic traffic protection to improve the reliability of our network and increase its traffic capacity. The network is fully supervised and operated by management systems that allow rapid response to customer service requests and reduce the recovery time in case of failure.

We operate an internet backbone network and a fullyIP-routed network, which provides a backbone for all internet dedicatedinternet-dedicated services and VPN offerings through access routers, for customer aggregation, configured as single edge routers (i.e., offering various types of services aggregation over a single box), allowing us to reduce capital and operation expenses. Our internet backbone connects to the public internet via national peeringspeering links and international links that we maintain in the United States.

Our transportation network is directly interconnected to the national and international long-distance networks of all long-distance service providers operating in Regions I, II and III and all mobile services providers in Regions I, II and III.

IPTV Network

Through our FTTH network, we offered IPTV services in 2786 cities over10in more than 20 states as of December 31, 2018.2019. For subscribers of ourOi TV services, through our DTH or FTTH networks, we also offer OTT services, which provide customers with access to different content on different devices (mobile phones, tablets and computers).

Property, Plant and Equipment

As of December 31, 2018,2019, the net book value of our property, plant and equipment was R$28,46938,911 million. As of December 31, 2018,2019, of the net book value of our property, plant and equipment, (1) transmission and other equipment, primarily data communication equipment, network systems and infrastructure (including alternating and direct current supply equipment) and motor-generator groups, represented 50.0%43.6%; (2) infrastructure, primarily consisting of metallic and fiber-optic cable networks and lines, underground ducts, posts and towers, represented 25.5%21.8%; (3) right of use – leases, primarily consisting of communications towers, real estate, stores, vehicles, and sites (physical spaces), represented 20.3%; (4) work in progress represented 11.8%5.5%; (4)(5) buildings represented 5.9%3.9%; (5)(6) automatic switching equipment, consisting of trunking and switching stations (including local, tandem and transit telephone exchanges), represented 4.1%2.6%; and (6)(7) other fixed assets represented 2.7%2.2%.

All Brazilian property, plant and equipment that are essential in providing the services described in our fixed-line concession agreements are considered “reversible assets,” which means that, should our fixed-line concession agreements expire or terminate without being renewed, these assets will automatically revert to ANATEL. There are no other encumbrances that may affect the utilization of our property, plant and equipment. For more details, see note 1316 to our audited consolidated financial statements included in this annual report.

Transmission and Other Equipment

We have a nationwide long-distance backbone, consisting of an optical fiber network that covers more than 2,2592,275 municipalities, connecting the Federal District and all state capitals in Brazil. This fiber network supports high capacity DWDM systems that can operate with up to 80 channels at 10, 100 and 200 Gbps. We have implemented an Optical Transport Network/DWDM, or OTN/DWDM network, with 100 Gbps links that connect 1821 state capitals, including São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Brasília and Belo Horizonte, which spreads over approximately 48,000 km of optical cables. Our optical network is complemented by microwave links to reach smaller cities and towns.

Infrastructure

Our Brazilian access networks connect our customers to our signal aggregation and transportation networks. We have a large number of network access points, including twisted copper pair wires to residences and commercial buildings, fiber optic lines to residences and commercial buildings, wireless transmission equipment andWi-Fi hotspots. Our fixed-line networks are fully digitalized.

Voice and data signals sent through our access network are routed through our aggregation networks to digital switches which connect voice calls and route digital signals to their destinations. Portions of our aggregation network use conventional copper trunk linesIn the past, we used ATM protocol to connecttransport digital signals through our access network fromnon-residential customers that required dedicated bandwidth to our switches and transportation networks. For a small portionswitching stations. In response to changing customer needs, we converted elements of our aggregation network we stillthat use ATM and SDH protocols, which permit us to offer dedicated bandwidth to our customers, to MPLS protocol, which supports IP and permits the creation of VPNs through our Metro Ethernet networks. We now useMPLS-TP capable devices that have been designed to permit high speed transmission of these signals. Other portionsinterface with our existing Metro Ethernet Network to increase the bandwidth of our aggregationnetworks to support our 4G network use fiber optic cable to connectdata traffic and replace our access network to our switches and transportation networks usinglegacy SDH protocol.networks. In large metropolitan areas where the density of access point results in increased demand, we have deployed Metro Ethernet networks.

Automatic switching equipmentSwitching Equipment

Voice and data signals that originate through fixed-line access points are routed through Multi-service Access Nodes,MSANs or MSANs,DSLAMs to our aggregation networks, orand transportation networks. The analog voice signals are rerouted to our aggregation networks through Digital Subscriber Line Access Multiplexer, or DSLAM, equipment which split the voice signal from the digital signaldata signals, which isare transmitted using ADSL or VDSL technology.technology, allowing us to offer broadband and analog voice on a single copper wire pair. As of December 31, 2018,2019, approximately 93%91% of our fixed- linefixed-line network supported ADSL2+ or VDSL2 and we provided ADSLADSL2+ or VDSL2 services in approximately 4,700 municipalities.

Voice and data signals sent and received through our 2G, 3G and 4G access points are routed to our aggregation networks. Our mobile networks have unique data core and are fully integrated with our fixed-line data networks.

As of December 31, 2018:2019:

 

our 4G mobile access networks consisted of 9,61312,622 active radio base stations covering 9021,018 municipalities, or 74%75% of the urban population of Brazil;

 

our 3G mobile access networks consisted of 10,20210,350 active radio base stations covering 1,6441,645 municipalities, or 82% of the urban population of Brazil; and

 

our 2G mobile access networks consisted of 13,80414,019 active radio base stations covering 3,4463,497 municipalities, or 93%94% of the urban population of Brazil.

In addition to our mobile access networks, we also operateWi-Fi hotspots in indoor public and commercial areas such as coffee shops, airports and shopping centers. As of December 31, 2018,2019, ourWi-Fi network consisted of more than two million hotspots, with broadband access compatible with more than two million access points provided by Fon Wireless Ltd., or Fon, which allows our customers to access Fon lines worldwide.

Buildings

In addition to our headquarters building and our centralized national network operations center in Rio de Janeiro, we own 7,9657,998 buildings that are used to house switching equipment or to house regional and local sales and operations centers. Of these buildings, 7,7677,768 are “reversible assets” under our fixed-line concession agreements.

Capital Expenditures and Work in Progress

During the year ended December 31, 2018,2019, we modernized our core network, with a focus on infrastructure improvements and enhancing our customers’ experience, by making strategic investment decisions that allow us to do more with less.less and we invested in our FTTH network. As a result, we expanded our fiber optic backbone, which enhanced our data traffic capabilities for fixed and mobile networks, to keep up with the growing demand,demand. In addition, our performance on ANATEL’s network quality metrics improved.

The following table sets forth our capital expenditures for the periods indicated.

 

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2018   2017   2016 
   (in millions ofreais) 

Data transmission equipment

  R$1,993   R$1,846   R$1,377 

Installation services and devices

   539    644    489 

Mobile network and systems

   820    602    707 

Voice transmission

   731    726    713 

Information technology services

   720    729    536 

Telecommunication services infrastructure

   500    496    468 

Buildings, improvements and furniture

   70    80    69 

Network management system equipment

   171    94    124 

Backbone transmission

   304    237    196 

Internet services equipment

       1    7 

Other

   229    174    73 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total capital expenditures

  R$6,077   R$5,629   R$4,759 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2019   2018   2017 
   (in millions ofreais) 

Data transmission equipment

  R$2,947   R$1,993   R$1,846 

Installation services and devices

   742    539    644 

Mobile network and systems

   905    820    602 

Voice transmission

   496    731    726 

Information technology services

   684    720    729 

Telecommunication services infrastructure

   429    500    496 

Buildings, improvements and furniture

   88    70    80 

Network management system equipment

   224    171    94 

Backbone transmission

   630    304    237 

Internet services equipment

           1 

Other

   668    229    174 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total capital expenditures

  R$7,813   R$6,077   R$5,629 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Our principal capital expenditures relate to a variety of projects designed to expand and upgrade our transmission networks, our broadband access networks (fixed and mobile), our service platforms (data, video and voice), our information technology systems and our telecommunications services infrastructure.

Data Transmission Equipment Programs

We are engaged in a long-term program to upgrade portions of our fixed-line access networks with optical fiber networks based on gigabit passive optical network (GPON).GPON. The implementation of this technology permits us to provide broadband with speeds up to 200 Mbps to residential customers and up to 1 Gbps to commercial customers.

In our access networks, we have been engaged in a program of deployingfiber-to-the-home, or FTTH technology to support our “triple play” services, using a GPON network engineered to support IPTV, high speed internet (currently speeds up to 200 Mbps), and VoIP services.

We have acquired and installed data communications equipment to convert elements of our networks that used ATM and Synchronous Digital Hierarchy, or SDH protocols to MPLS protocol over optical fiber, which supports IP and permits the creation of VPNs through our MetroEthernetMetro Ethernet networks. We also deployed an optical switching layer based on optical transport network technology in order to provide more efficient use of our DWDM capacity, fast restorations, and IP routers traffic offloading.

We have been implementing a new broadband data communications network architecture, which we refer to as the Single Edge project. This architecture enables Oi to offer access network services such as mobile, broadband, IPTV, and corporate customer links in a single platform, which eliminates the need for individual management of each type of access network, expedites the resolution of networksnetwork problems and minimizes maintenance and operation costs.

In addition to expanding our IP backbone capacity, we are continuing to simplify our transport network architecture through the adoption of the single edgesingle-edge concept, which means using one single router to join our commercial, mobile and residential functions that would otherwise require many specialized routers. We believe that this network simplification will reduce both capital and operational expenditures.

Mobile Services Network Programs

4G Network

We offer 4G services using LTE network technology and have been deploying our 4G network since 2012. In compliance with our obligations under our LTE authorizations, in 2016, we extended our LTE network to cities with over 100,000 inhabitants, adding 284 new cities to our LTE network, and in 2017, we extended our LTE network to cities with less than 100,000 inhabitants, adding 813 cities to our LTE network.

In 2018, we began deploying 4.5G services by using Carrier Aggregationcarrier aggregation with 1800 MHz spectrum refarming and MIMO 4x4 in 27 municipalities in the first phase of the project. It has allowed us to offer best user experience and aligning our network to main operators in Brazil.

3G Network

We have undertaken a project to upgrade a portion of our mobile networks to enable us to increase the capacity of our mobile network. We have deployed new radio base stations and transceivers to improve our 3G coverage and quality in areas we already serve, reducing the level of signal congestion in these areas, and to expand our 3G service to municipalities in Brazil to which we have not historically provided 3G service.

Voice Transmission Network Programs

We are engaged in a program of investing in new equipment for our switching stations to support next-generation networks, which we believe will permit us to offer new value-added services to our fixed-line customers. We believe that our investment in next-generation networks will:

 

assist us in meeting the increased demand for long distance traffic, both domestic and international, through the use of VoIP;

 

permit us to offer differentiated services, such as voice over broadband; and

 

significantly promotefixed-to-mobile convergence.

As part of this program, we have deployed an IP Multimedia Subsystem, or IMS core that will facilitate our convergent voice and broadband offerings. The IMS core not only provides control for the VoIP resource but also integrated access control and authentication for all services, significantly improving automation and speed for customer provisioning.

We have also undertaken a program of removing and replacing smaller switching stations and integrating these operations with other switching stations to promote efficiency in our operations.

Information Technology Services Programs

We are investing in the expansion of supply ofin our cloud computing services in data centers, particularly in the State of São Paulo, in order to support the growing demand from our corporate customers. Our cloud computing services enable us to provide our customers with integrated telecommunications and information technology solutions.

Telecommunications Services Infrastructure Programs

We are investing in several structural projects in order to improve and modernize our business support systems or BSS, and operational support systems, or OSS, and consolidate duplicative systems resulting from integrating previously acquired companies, thereby optimizing our capital and operational expenditure investments. Based on the Telemanagement Forum frameworks and best practices, our main projects are unified customer relationship management; network provisioning services; order management; consolidation of network inventory; network planning, project and construction; network fault management; performance management; customer experience management; API management and digital self-care, among others.

One of the primary projects connected to the OSS is related to assurance and quality. In January 2017, we completed the transition from a network centric monitoring system to a customer focusedcustomer-focused approach and thereby our network operations have migrated from network operations centers to service operations centers which provide more efficient and customer-based support.

In December 2016, we completed a project to improve fulfillment by speeding up service creation and provisioning, reducing costly human intervention and increasing overall customer quality of experience through automation of the fulfillment processes.

Intellectual Property

We hold several material intellectual property assets, including patents and trademarks registered with the Brazilian Patent and Trademark Office (Instituto Nacional de Propriedade Industrial), or BPTO. Our main trademark used in Brazil, “Oi,” is registered with the BPTO in several classes, which allows us to use this trademark in a variety of markets in which we operate, including in connection with our fixed-line, mobile and broadband services.

Operating Agreements

Fixed-Line and Mobile Tower Leases

We have entered into three operating lease agreements with owners of communications towers and rooftop antennae to lease space to install equipment related to the delivery of our personal mobility servicesPersonal Mobility Services on an aggregate of approximately 4,850 communications towers and rooftop antennae. We have also entered into three operating lease agreements with owners of fixed-line communications towers to lease space to install equipment related to the delivery of our fixed-line services on an aggregate of approximately 6,400 fixed-line communications towers.

The monthly payments under two of our operating lease agreements for space on communications towers and rooftop antennae reflect a base rental amount specified in the agreement, adjusted annually during the first seven years of the lease by the greater of 6.5% or the positive variation of IPCA, and adjusted annually thereafter by the positive variation of IPCA. The monthly payments, under the remainder of the operating lease agreements, reflect a base rental amount specified in the agreement, adjusted annually by the positive variation of IPCA.

The operating lease agreements for space on communications towers and rooftop antennae have15-year terms expiring between December 2027 and June 20192029 and are automatically renewable for successiveone-year periods. The operating lease agreements for space on fixed-line communications towers have20-year terms expiring between April 2033 and July 2033 and are renewable for additional20-year terms.

Infrastructure Sharing Agreements

4G Network

We currentlyAs of the date of this annual report, we are party to two Radio Access Network, or RAN, sharing agreements with other operators. RAN sharing enables operators to share the same physical network, thus reducing the deployment costs in proportion to each operator’s respective coverage requirements while maintaining all of the characteristics of an individual network with respect to our customers. RAN sharing makes use of 3GPP standard features, permitting full technical support. As a result, RAN sharing agreements allow us to reduce operating expenses and capital expenditures.

In November 2012, we entered into a memorandum of understanding with TIM under which we agreed to the joint use of elements of our 4G network under a RAN sharing model pursuant to which we have invested in (and provided TIM with access to) infrastructure in certain cities, while TIM has invested in (and provided us with access to) infrastructure in other cities. In late 2013, we and TIM extended this memorandum of understanding to additional cities and revised certain obligations of each party under the memorandum of understanding, which we refer to as the 2013 RAN Sharing Agreement. The 2013 RAN Sharing Agreement has a term of 15 years. Under the 2013 RAN Sharing Agreement, we offer 4G technology to over 80% of urban areas in all Brazilian capital cities and cities with over 500,000 inhabitants. In 2015, we expanded the 2013 RAN Sharing Agreement with TIM to cities with over 200,000 inhabitants, 133 municipalities covered by 4G technology, and we began a RAN sharing arrangement with Telefônica Brasil. In 2016, we expanded to cities with over 100,000 inhabitants, reaching 284 cities with 4G coverage. In 2017, we expanded to cities with less than 100,000 inhabitants, reaching 813 cities with 4G coverage. In 2018, we and TIM amended the 2013 RAN Sharing Agreement to update the technology covered by the agreement to permit infrastructure sharing in the 1800 MHz spectrum technology.

In June 2015, we entered into a memorandum of understanding under which we agreed to the joint use of elements of the 4G network under a RAN sharing model pursuant to which Oi, TIM, and Telefônica Brasil agreed to invest proportionally (50% Telefônica Brasil, 25% Oi and 25% TIM) in sites in certain cities based on each operators’ respective coverage obligations, which we refer to as the 2015 RAN Sharing Agreement. The 2015 RAN Sharing Agreement has a term of 12 years. In early 2016, ANATEL required the inclusion of additional clauses in the agreement allowing an additional operator to be added. This agreement covered 31 cities in 2015, 171 cities in 2016 and 427 cities in 2017.

Satellite Network and Leases

Residential Services

We have deployed a range of satellite-based services to comply with our public service obligations to the rural and remote areas of Brazil, including the Amazon rainforest region. These satellite services include internet access and access to corporate data applications. The satellite network comprises satellite earth stations located in less-populated rural areas, as well as hub stations in the cities of Brasília, Manaus, Belém, Rio de Janeiro, Porto Velho, Boa Vista, Macapá, Santarém, and Marabá. Our fiber optic backbone connects all these hub stations. The integration of the land-based segment of our satellite network allows us to provide fixed-line and mobile voice service to our subscribers in any location in our fixed-line service areas.

As of December 31, 2018,2019, we leased transponders from our affiliate Hispamar Satélite S.A., or Hispamar, with:

 

98.343 MHz of capacity on the Amazonas 3 satellite in Ku band and 540252 MHz of capacity on the Amazonas 2 satellite in Ku band to provide voice and data services to approximately 3,000 localities; and

 

754580 MHz of capacity on the Amazonas 3 satellite in C band and 432378 MHz of capacity on the Amazonas 2 satellite in C band to provide voice and data services to approximately 390 municipalities.

DTH Network

We provide our DTH services through satellite uplinks that receive, encode and transmit the television signals to satellite transponders (1) located in Lurin, Peru that we lease from a subsidiary of Telefónica S.A., and (2) through our own facilities in Barra da Tijuca near Rio de Janeiro.

As of December 31, 2018,2019, we leased transponders to provide DTH services from:

Telefónica S.A with 216 MHz of capacity on the Amazonas 3 satellite in Ku band and 36 MHz of capacity on the Amazonas 2 satellite in Ku band; and

from SES New Skies with 1.5 GHz of capacity on theSES-6 satellite in Ku band.

Agreements for Network Equipment and Services

In 2018, we entered into agreements with strategic suppliers to acquire equipment and services to support the modernization of network technologies for the expansion of mobile telephone service coverage and fiber optic broadband capacity. These projects are designed to modernize and consolidate our mobile network technologies, permitting our gradual use of our 2G and 3G frequencies to provide 4.5G services in all municipalities currently served by our mobile network and prepare our network for the implementation of 5G technology and Internet of Things (IoT) solutions. Under this agreement, we expect to acquire equipment and services from Huawei over the next five years.

Network Maintenance

Our external plant and equipment maintenance, installation and network servicing are performed by our wholly-owned subsidiary Serede Serviços de Rede S.A., or Serede, as well as one third-party service provider, Telemont. We employ our own team of technicians for our internal plant and equipment maintenance.

Insourced Network Maintenance

In May 2013 and June 2013, we insourced our installation, operations, and corrective and preventive maintenance services in connection with our fixed-line telecommunications services, mobile telecommunications services, data transmission services (including broadband access services), satellite services, buildings, access ways and towers. These services had previously been provided by Nokia Solutions and Networks do Brasil Telecomunicações Ltda. and Alcatel-Lucent Brasil S.A.

We have entered into arms’-length services agreements with our wholly-owned subsidiary Serede to perform our external plant and equipment maintenance, installation and network servicing in the States of São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Rio Grande do Sul, Santa Catarina, Paraná, Maranhão, Piauí, Ceará, Rio Grande do Norte, Paraíba, Pernambuco, Alagoas, Sergipe, Bahia, Amazonas, Roraima, Pará and Amapá.

In January 2012, we entered into a services agreement with Serede for installation, operation, and corrective and preventive maintenance in connection with our external plants and associated equipment, public telephones, and fiber optic and data communication networks (including broadband access services) in certain parts of the State of Rio de Janeiro. Over the years, we have amended this agreement to expand its scope to the entirety of the State of Rio de Janeiro (following our acquisition of Telemont’s operations in Rio de Janeiro), as well as the States of São Paulo, Rio Grande do Sul, Santa Catarina and Paraná (following our acquisition of A.R.M Engenharia in June 2016). The total estimated payments under this contract, which expires in January 2022, are approximately R$10.0 billion.

In June 2016, we acquired 100% of the capital stock of A.R.M. Engenharia and changed its corporate name to Rede Conecta – Serviços de Rede S.A. In November 2018, Rede Conecta merged into Serede. In July 2016,Through Serede we entered into a services agreement with Rede Conecta forperform installation, operation and corrective and preventive maintenance in connection with our external plant and associated equipment, public telephones, and fiber optic and data communication networks (including broadband access services) in the States of Maranhão, Piauí, Ceará, Rio Grande do Norte, Paraíba, Pernambuco, Alagoas, Sergipe, Bahia, Amazonas, Roraima, Pará and Amapá. The total estimated payments under this contract, which expires in June 2021, are approximately R$3.2 billion.

Outsourced Network Maintenance

In October 2012, we entered into five-year services agreements with Telemont for installation, operation, and corrective and preventive maintenance in connection with our external plant and associated equipment, public telephones, and fiber optic and data communication networks (including broadband access services) in the States of Minas Gerais, Espírito Santo, Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso do Sul, Tocantins, Acre, Rondônia and Goiás and the Federal District. The total payments under this contract, which expired in October 2017, amounted to R$3.7 billion.

In October 2017, we entered into new services agreements with Telemont for installation, operation, and corrective and preventive maintenance in connection with our external plant and associated equipment, public telephones, and fiber optic and data communication networks (including broadband access services) in the States of Minas Gerais, Espírito Santo, Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso do Sul, Tocantins, Acre, Rondônia and Goiás and the Federal District. The total estimated payments under this contract, which expires in October 2022, are approximately R$4.2 billion.

Research and Development

We conduct independent innovation, research and development in areas of telecommunications services but historically we have not independently developed new telecommunications technologies. We depend primarily on suppliers of telecommunications equipment for the development of new technology. Our investments in innovation, research and development totaled R$34 million during 2019, R$17 million induring 2018 and R$16 million in 2017 and R$20 million in 2016.during 2017.

Joint Venture, Associated Companies and AssetsHeld-For-Sale

Joint Venture

We own 19.04% of the share capital of Hispamar Satélite S.A., or Hispamar, aSpanish-Brazilian enterprise created in November 1999 by Hispasat (the leading satellite telecommunications provider in the Iberian Peninsula), and our company. Hispamar operates the Amazonas 2 and Amazonas 3 satellites. In December 2002, we entered into an agreement with Hispasat that granted and transferred to Hispamar the rights to exploit geostationary orbital position 61 degrees west, and we acquired a minority equity stake in Hispamar.

In 2009, the Amazonas 2 satellite was launched and this satellite commenced commercial operations in early 2010. This satellite provides both C and Ku band transponders andon-board switching, with an expected useful life of 15 years. The Amazonas 2 satellite is owned by a subsidiary of Hispasat and Hispamar has been granted the right to operate and lease all of the transponder’s space segment on this satellite.

In 2013, the Amazonas 3 satellite was launched and commenced commercial operations. This satellite provides both C and Ku band transponders, with an expected useful life of 15 years. The Amazonas 3 satellite is owned by Hispamar, which operates and leases all of the transponder’s space segment on this satellite.

Associated Company

We own 50% of Companhia AIX de Participações S.A., or AIX. AIX provides infrastructure services to our company and is engaged in the construction of ductwork for the installation of fiber optic cables along highways in the State of São Paulo.

AssetsHeld-for-Sale

Our board of directors has authorized our management to take the necessary measures to market our shares in Africatel and TPT—Telecomunicações Públicas de Timor, S.A., or TPT. As a result, we record the assets and liabilities of Africatel and TPT asheld-for sale, although we do not record Africatel or TPT as discontinued operations in our income statement due to the immateriality of the effects of Africatel and TPT on our results of operations.

Africatel

Africatel Holdings B.V., or Africatel, was formed in May 2006 and indirectly holds our equity interests in Unitel, Cabo Verde Telecom, S.A., or CVTelecom, and CST – Companhia Santomense de Telecomunicações, S.A.R.L., or CST, and Directel—Listas Telefónicas Internacionais, Lda., or Directel. We own 86% of the share capital of Africatel.

Unitel

Africatel indirectly owns 25% of the share capital of Unitel, a mobile service provider in Angola. Following our acquisition of PT Portugal in 2014, which resulted in our acquisition of our interest in Africatel, we brought suits against Unitel in the courts of Angola and instituted arbitral proceedings against the other shareholders of Unitel in the International Court of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce based on our inability to collect dividends owed to us by Unitel and breaches of the Unitel shareholders’ agreement. For more information about these proceedings, see “Item 8. Financial Information—Legal Proceedings—Legal Proceedings Relating to Our Interest in Unitel.”

CVTelecom

Africatel indirectly owns 40% of the share capital of CVTelecom, a provider of fixed-line and mobile services in the Cabo Verde Islands, that was established in 1995 and provides fixed-line and mobile telecommunications services under the terms of a25-year license granted in 1996.

Following our acquisition of PT Portugal in 2014, which resulted in our acquisition of our interest in Africatel, we instituted arbitral proceedings against the Republic of Cape Verde in the International Court of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce, disputing its interpretation of the shareholders’ agreement governing CVTelecom which the Republic of Cape Verde terminate this shareholders’ agreement. In March 2015, we also commenced an arbitration proceeding against the Republic of Cabo Verde before the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, or ICSID, due to the violation of CVTelecom’s exclusivity rights under the concession agreement by the Republic of Cabo Verde.

CST

Africatel indirectly owns 51% of the share capital of CST, a provider of fixed and mobile services in São Tomé and Principe, that was established in 1989 and provides fixed-line and mobile telecommunications services under the terms of a20-year license granted in 2007.

Directel

Africatel indirectly owns 100% of the share capital of Directel, a Portuguese entity with subsidiaries in Angola, Cabo Verde, Mozambique, and Kenya, which publish telephone directories and operate related data bases in those countries.

TPT

We own 76.14% of the share capital of TPT, a Portuguese holding company that owns 54.01% of the share capital of Timor Telecom, S.A., or Timor Telecom, which provides telecommunications, multimedia and IT services in Timor Leste in Asia. Our wholly-owned subsidiary PT Participações also holds 3.05% of the share capital of Timor Telecom.

Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry

Overview

Our business, including the nature of the services we provide and the rates we charge, is subject to comprehensive regulation under the Brazilian General Telecommunications Law (Lei Geral das Telecomunicações), or the General Telecommunications Law, and a comprehensive regulatory framework for the provision of telecommunications services promulgated by ANATEL. We provide fixed-line, domestic and international long-distance, mobile telecommunications, data transmission andPay-TV services under concessions, authorizations and licenses that were granted by ANATEL and allow us to provide specified services in designated geographic areas, as well as set forth certain obligations with which we must comply.

ANATEL is an administratively independent and financially autonomous regulatory agency that was established in July 1997 pursuant to the General Telecommunications Law and ANATEL Regulation (Regulamento da Agência Nacional de Telecomunicações). ANATEL oversees our activities and enforces the General Telecommunications Law and the regulations promulgated thereunder. ANATEL is required to report on its activities to the Brazilian Ministry of Communication,Science, Technology, Innovations and Communications (Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovações e Comunicações), and has authority to propose and to issue regulations that are legally binding on telecommunications service providers. ANATEL also has the authority to grant concessions and licenses for all telecommunications services, other than broadcasting services. In addition, ANATEL is authorized to direct and control the provision of services, the shareholding structure of service providers, to apply penalties and to declare the expiration of the concession and authorizations and the return of assets from the concessionaire to the government authority upon termination of the concession. Any regulation or action proposed by ANATEL is subject to a period of public comment, which may include public hearings, and ANATEL’s decisions may be challenged administratively before the agency itself or through the Brazilian judicial system.

The current regulatory framework for the Brazilian telecommunications industry was adopted in 1998. Under the General Telecommunications Law and ANATEL regulations, the right to provide telecommunications services is granted either through a concession under the public regime (as discussed below) or an authorization under the private regime (as discussed below). A concession is granted for a fixed period of time following a public auction and is generally renewable only once.renewable. An authorization is granted for an indeterminate period of time and public auctions are held for some authorizations. These concessions and authorizations allow service providers to provide specific services in designated geographic areas, set forth certain obligations with which the service providers must comply and require equal treatment of customers by the service providers.

The three principal providers of fixed-line telecommunications services in Brazil, Telefônica Brasil, Claro and our company, provide these services under the public regime. In addition, CTBC and Sercomtel, which are secondary local fixed-line telecommunications service providers, operate under the public regime. All of the other providers of fixed-line telecommunications services and all providers of personal mobile services and data transmission services in Brazil operate under the private regime.

On October 3, 2019, the President of Brazil signed Law No. 13,879, which amended the General Telecommunications Law to allow, among other things, providers of fixed-line telecommunications services operating under a concession in the public regime to convert their concessions into authorizations to operate in the private regime and thereby eliminate a number of substantial obligations currently imposed by the concession regime. In February 2020, ANATEL proposed regulations to implement Law No. 13,879, including the rules that will govern the conversion of concessions into authorizations. These proposed regulations are subject to a public consultation period that is expected to expire on April 30, 2020. We cannot predict when and to what extent these regulations will be adopted. For more information, see “—Public Regime—Amendments to the General Telecommunications Law” and “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry and Regulatory Environment—We cannot assure you that we will be able to convert our concessions into authorizations or renew our concessions in a timely or cost-effective manner.”

Public Regime

Overview

Providers of public regime services are subject to more obligations and restrictions than providers of private regime services. Under Brazilian law, providers of public regime services are subject to certain requirements with respect to services such as network expansion and network modernization. Under their concession agreements, public regime service providers are required to comply with the provisions of the General Plan of Universal Service Goals (Plano Geral de Metas de Universalização), or PGMU, which was most recently updated in December 2018. For more information about the PGMU and our obligations thereunder, see “—General Plan of Universal Service Goals (PGMU).”

In addition, public regime service providers, as well as private regime service providers, are required to comply with the provisions ofof: (1) the General Plan of Quality Goals (Plano Geral de Metas de Qualidade), or PGMQ,RGQ, which was adopted by ANATEL in June 2013 and was partially superseded by the RQUAL in December 2019; and (2) the General Plan on Competition Targets (Plano Geral de Metas de CompetiçCompetição), or PGMC, which was adopted by ANATEL in November 2012 and updated in July 2018. For more information about the PGMQRGQ, the RQUAL and the PGMC see “—Our“ —Our Services—Fixed-Line Telephone Services—General Plan on Quality Regulation”Goals (RGQ),” “ —Other Regulatory Matters—Quality of Telecommunications Services Regulation (RQUAL)” and “—Other“ —Other Regulatory Matters—General Plan on Competition Targets (PGMC),” respectively.

The rates that public regime service providers may charge customers are subject to ANATEL supervision. Another distinctive feature of public concessions is the right of the concessionaire to maintain certain economic and financial standards, which are calculated based on the rules set forth in the concession agreements and waswere designed based on a price cap model. For more information, see “Our“—Our Services—Fixed-Line Telephone Services—Rate Regulation.”

Concessions are granted for a fixed20 years.Whereas prior to the passage of Law No. 13,897, only one20-year renewal period was allowed, the new law permits providers to renew their concession for indefinite additional20-year periods, provided that at least 30 months prior to each expiration date, the providers have complied with the obligations required of time and are generally renewable only once.them under the applicable concession. ANATEL may terminate the concession of any public regime service provider upon the occurrence of certain events described below under “—Termination of a Concession.” The modification right permits ANATEL to impose new terms and conditions in response to changes in technology, competition in the marketplace and domestic and international economic conditions. ANATEL is obligated to engage in public consultation in connection with each of these potential modifications.

General Plan of Universal Service Goals (PGMU)

The PGMU sets forth the principal network expansion and modernization obligations of the public regime providers. The PGMU was approved by Decree No. 9,619 and became effective on December 21, 2018, the date when it was published in the Official Gazette.

Public regime providers are subject to network expansion requirements under the PGMU, which are revised by ANATEL from time to time. No subsidies or other supplemental financings are anticipated to finance our network expansion obligations. Our failure to meet the network expansion and modernization obligations established by the PGMU or in our concession agreements may result in fines and penalties of up to R$50 million for eachnon-compliance with an obligation or rule as verified in an administrative process, as well as potential revocation of our concessions.

The PGMU requires the following, among other things:

 

local fixed-line service providers to provide individual access to fixed-line voice services to economically disadvantaged segments of the Brazilian population within their service areas, through programs to be established and regulated by ANATEL;

 

local fixed-line service providers to install public telephones on demand in locations with more than 100 inhabitants;

 

local fixed-line service providers to install fixed lines in locations with more than 300 inhabitants (1) in regions where there is no fixed line installed, within 120 days of a request and (2) in regions where fixed lines are already installed, within 7 days of a request for 90% of requests and in up to 25 days of a request for the remaining 10% of requests; and

 

local fixed-line service providers to gradually provide voice access in the wireless local loop technology with capacity for 4G services in 1,400 locations (of which 1,155 apply to Oi), according to the following schedule: 10% of such locations by December 31, 2019; 25% by December 31, 2020; 45% by December 31, 2021; 70% by December 31, 2022; and 100% by December 31, 2023.

Similarly to the 2008 amendments to the PGMU that eliminated the requirements to provide public telephone centers (postos de serviço telefônico) in exchange for building backhaul, the 2018 PGMU eliminated the requirements to provide multifacility service centers (postos de serviço multifacilidade), which are public centers located in rural areas that offersoffer various telecommunications services, including voice, access to the internet and digital transmission of text and images, and to install and maintain public telephones within a fixed-line service concession, in exchange for other obligations to be defined.

The value of the obligations currently imposed by the PGMU and, therefore, the cost of the additional investments or fees to be paid to ANATEL in exchange for the elimination of such obligations, is subject to discussion between the parties, with ANATEL having the ability to make the final valuation.

Termination of a Concession

ANATEL may terminate the concession of any public regime service provider upon the occurrence of any of the following:

 

an extraordinary situation jeopardizing the public interest, in which case the Brazilian government is authorized to start rendering the services set forth under the concession in lieu of the concessionaire, subject to congressional authorization and payment of adequate indemnification to the owner of the terminated concession;

 

termination by the provider (through an agreement with ANATEL or pursuant to legal proceedings) as a consequence of an act or omission of the Brazilian government that makes the rendering of the services excessively burdensome to the provider;

 

annulment of the concession due to a contractual term, which is deemed by subsequent law to be illegal;

 

material failure to comply with the provider’s universalization targets;

 

failure to meet insurance requirements set forth in the concession agreement;

asplit-up,spin-off, amalgamation, merger, capital reduction or transfer of the provider’s control without ANATEL’s authorization;

 

the transfer of the concession without ANATEL’s authorization;

 

the dissolution or bankruptcy of the provider; or

 

an extraordinary situation in which Brazilian government intervention, although legally permissible, is not undertaken, as such intervention would prove to be inconvenient, unnecessary or would result in an unfair benefit to the provider.

In the event a concession is terminated, ANATEL is authorized to administer the provider’s properties and its employees in order to continue rendering services.

Service Restrictions

Public regime service providers are subject to certain restrictions on alliances, joint ventures and mergers and acquisitions with other public regime providers, including:

 

a prohibition on members of the same economic group holding more than two licenses for the provision of telecommunications services in the public regime, which would include holding more than 20% of the voting shares of or controlling (as such term is defined under ANATEL’s regulations) more than two providers of public regime telecommunications services; and

 

a restriction, as set forth in the PGO, on mergers between providers of public regime telecommunications services.

a restriction, as set forth in the General Grant Plan (Plano General de Outorgas), or PGO, on mergers between providers of public regime telecommunications services.

In September 2011, Law No. 12,485 became effective, which creates a new legal framework for subscription television services in Brazil, and determines, among other provisions to:to:

 

allow fixed-line telephone concessionaires, such as us, to enter the cable television market in Brazil;

 

remove existing restrictions on foreign capital investments in cable television providers;

 

limit the total and voting capital held by broadcast concessionaires and authorized providers, and in television programmers and producers, with headquarters in Brazil to 30%; and

 

prohibit telecommunications service providers with collective interests from acquiring rights to disseminate images of events of national interest and from hiring domestic artistic talent.

Amendments to the General Telecommunications Law

On October 3, 2019, the President of Brazil signed Law No. 13,879, which amended the General Telecommunications Law. Law No. 13,879 will allow providers of fixed-line telecommunications services operating under a concession in the public regime to convert their concessions into authorizations to operate in the private regime and thereby eliminate a number of substantial obligations currently imposed by the concession regime, including the inability of providers to sell certain property, plant and equipment used to provide fixed-line telephone services. In exchange, providers may be required to assume obligations to make additional investments in their networks, primarily related to the expansion of broadband services. The cost of the additional investments in exchange for the elimination of such obligations, would be subject to discussion between the parties, with ANATEL having the ability to make the final valuation. In addition, the new law permits providers to renew their concession for indefinite additional20-year periods, whereas previously only one20-year renewal period was allowed, provided that at least 30 months prior to each expiration date, the providers have complied with the obligations required of them under the applicable concession. In February 2020, ANATEL proposed regulations to implement Law No. 13,879, including the rules that will govern the conversion of concessions into authorizations, such as the methodology for calculating the cost of investments that providers will need to undertake as well as deadlines to complete the conversions. A draft of the new form of authorization agreement was also provided. These proposed regulations are subject to a public consultation period that is expected to expire on April 30, 2020. We cannot predict when and to what extent these regulations will be adopted. See “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry and Regulatory Environment—We cannot assure you that we will be able to convert our concessions into authorizations or renew our concessions in a timely or cost-effective manner.”

Private Regime

Providers of private regime services, although not generally subject to the requirements concerning continuity and universality of service and network modernization, are subject to certain network expansion and quality of service obligations set forth in their respective authorizations and applicable regulation.

For example, private regime service providers are required to comply with the provisions of the PGMQRGQ and the PGMC. For more information about the PGMQRGQ and the PGMC, see “—Our Services—Fixed-Line Telephone Services—General Plan on Quality Regulation”Goals (RGQ)” and “—Other Regulatory Matters—General Plan on Competition Targets (PGMC),” respectively.

Our Services

Fixed-Line Telephone Services

Regulatory Overview

We provide the majority of our fixed-line telephone services (Serviço Telefônico Fixo Comutado—STFC) in accordance with concession agreements under the public regime. For more information about the regulations applicable to public regime telephone service providers, see “—Public Regime.”

Our Concessions and Authorizations

The following table sets forth certain details of our concessions and authorizations to provide local, domestic long-distance and international long-distanced fixed-line telephone services:

 

Geographic Scope

  

Type of Service

  

Termination Date

  

Regime

Region I of the PGO – States of Rio De Janeiro, Minas Gerais, Espírito Santo, Bahia, Sergipe, Alagoas, Pernambuco, Paraiba, Rio Grande do Norte, Ceará, Piauí, Maranhão, Pará, Amapá, Amazonas e Roraima, except Sector 3 of Region I of the PGO(1)  Local / Domestic Long-Distance  December 31, 2025(2)  Concession
Region I of the PGO – Sector 3(1)  Local / Domestic Long-Distance  Indeterminate  Authorization
Region II of the PGO – States of Santa Catarina, Paraná, Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso do Sul, Goiás, Tocantins, Distrito Federal, Rondônia, Acre and Rio Grande Do Sul, cxceptexcept for Sectors 20, 22 and 25(2)(3)  Local / Domestic Long-Distance  December 31, 2025(2)  Concession
Region II of the PGO – PGO—Sectors 20, 22 and 25(2)(3)  Local / Domestic Long-Distance  Indeterminate  Authorization
Region III of the PGO – São Paulo  Local / Domestic Long-Distance  Indeterminate  Authorization
National  International Long Distance  Indeterminate  Authorization

 

(1)

Sector 3 of Region III of the PGO corresponds to 57 municipalities in the State of Minas Gerais.

(2)

Concession agreements may be amended by the parties every five years prior to their termination date. In connection with each five-year amendment, ANATEL has the right, following public consultations, to impose new terms and conditions in response to changes in technology, competition in the marketplace and domestic and international economic conditions. Our concession agreements were last amended in 2011. Under their existing terms, our concession agreements may be amended by December 2020 at the latest.

(3)

Sectors 20, 22 and 25 of Region II of the PGO correspond to the following municipalities: Londrina, Paraná; Tamarana, Paraná; (Sector 22) Paranaíba, Mato Grosso do Sul;Sul (Sector 25); Buriti Alegre, Goiás; Cachoeira Dourada, Goiás; Inaciolândia, Goiás; Itumbiara, Goiás; Paranaiguara, Goiás; and São Simão, Goiás.

Each of our concession agreements:

 

sets forth the parameters that govern adjustments to our rates;

 

requires us to comply with the network expansion obligations set forth in the PGMU;

 

requires payment of biannual fees equal to 2.0% of our net operating revenue that is derived from the provision of our local fixed-line and domestic long-distance services (excluding taxes and social contributions) during the immediately preceding year;

In addition, each of our concession and authorization agreements:

 

sets forth the conditions under which ANATEL may access information from us;

 

requires us to comply with certain quality of service obligations as well as the quality of service obligations set forth in the PGMQ;RGQ;

 

requires us to pay fines for anynon-compliance with the regulatory rules including systemic service interruptions.

In addition, the PGMU requires us to provide transmission lines connecting our fiber-optic internet backbones to municipalities in our concession areas in which we did not provide internet service, which we refer to as backhaul. Under these concession agreements, we are obligated to set up backhaul in 3,188 municipalities in Regions I and II. The facilities that we constructed to meet these obligations are considered to be property that is part of our concessions and will therefore revert to the Brazilian government on January 1, 2026. For more information about the PGMU, see “—Public Regime—General Plan of Universal Service Goals (PGMU).”

On June 27, 2014, ANATEL opened a public comment period forOctober 3, 2019, the revisionPresident of Brazil signed Law No. 13,879, which amended the terms of our concession agreements. The comment period, which ended on December 26, 2014, was opened for comments on certain topics such as service universalization, rates and fees, among others. Throughout 2015, ANATEL, the Brazilian Ministry of Communication and telecommunications service providers met regularlyGeneral Telecommunications Law to discuss possible amendments to each of the concession agreements granted by ANATEL, including ours, and the implications of the developments and demands in the telecommunications sector in recent years. In September 2015, the Brazilian Ministry of Communication created a working group to evaluate the status of the concessions and propose guidelines for the amendment of the concession agreements. In April 2016, the Brazilian Ministry of Communication issued an ordinance addressing guidelines for the establishment of a new regulatory framework for telecommunications, which were expected to be implemented by ANATEL through the conclusion of the concession amendments. In line with the provisions of PLC 79, these guidelines provided for,allow, among other things, providers of fixed-line telecommunications services operating under a concession in the expansionpublic regime to convert their concessions into authorizations to operate in the private regime and thereby eliminate a number of broadband services (including in rural regions),substantial obligations currently imposed by the eliminationconcession regime. In addition, the new law permits providers to renew their concession for indefinite additional20-year periods, whereas previously only one20-year renewal period was allowed, provided that at least 30 months prior to each expiration date, the providers have complied with the obligations required of them under the reversibilityapplicable concession. Prior to the passage of assets, and an extension of the terms of concessions, which in our case are currently scheduled to expire in 2025. As a result of the publication of these guidelines, ANATEL requested a further postponement of the review ofLaw No. 13,879, our concession agreements which was granted. The implementation of these guidelines, however, depends on the passage of PLC 79 to provide the necessary legal authority and framework. As a result of the Brazilian Congress’s failure to date to pass PLC 79, the review of our concession agreements, which was scheduled to occur by June 2017, has not yet taken place, and further discussions regarding amendments to our concession agreementswould have halted pending resolution of PLC 79. Under their existing terms, our concession agreements may be amended by December 2020 at the latest. If PLC 79 is not passed, our concession agreements will expireexpired in 2025 without the possibility of renewal. In February 2020, ANATEL proposed regulations to implement Law No. 13,879, including the rules that will govern the conversion of concessions into authorizations. These proposed regulations are subject to a public consultation period that is expected to expire on April 30, 2020. We cannot predict when and to what extent these regulations will be adopted. Once these regulations are adopted, we expect that we will be able to migrate our public regime concessions into private-regime authorizations or renew our concessions, which would otherwise expire on December 31, 2025. However, as of the date of this annual report, we have not decided which option to pursue and cannot predict the cost of pursuing any of these options. For more information about Law No. 13,879, see “—Public Regime—Amendments to the General Telecommunications Law.”

In addition, in connection with the consideration of revisions to the concession agreements under the public regime, in January 2017, ANATEL proposed revisions to the terms of the PGO, in line with the provisions of PLC 79 which include(the bill that preceded Law No. 13, 789). However, despite the abilitypassage of companies operating under a concession in the public regimeLaw No. 13,789, we cannot predict when and to convert their concessions into authorizations to operate in the private regime and thereby eliminate a number of substantial obligations currently imposed by the concession regime, in exchange for the assumption of obligations to make additional investments in their networks, primarily related to the expansion of broadband services or through the payment of fees to ANATEL. The value of the obligations currently imposed by the concession agreement and, therefore, the cost of the additional investments or fees to be paid towhat extent ANATEL in exchange for the elimination of such obligations, would be subject to discussion between the parties, with ANATEL having the ability to make the final valuation. However, as a result of the legislative gridlock faced by PLC 79, ANATEL has halted implementation ofwill revise the PGO.

We cannot assure you that the implementation of Law No. 13,879 or any future amendments to our concession agreements (including renewals) or the PGO will not impose requirements on our company that will require us to undertake significant capital expenditures or will not modify the rate-setting procedures applicable to us in a manner that will significantly reduce the net operating revenue that we generate from our Brazilian fixed-line businesses. If the migration of our concessions to the private regime or the amendments to our Brazilian concession agreements have these effects, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. See “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry and Regulatory Environment—Our concession agreements in Brazil are subject to periodic modifications by ANATEL, and we cannot assure you that the modifications to these concession agreements will not have adverse effects on our company” and “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry and Regulatory Environment—We cannot assure you that we will be able to convert our concessions into authorizations or renew our concessions in a timely or cost-effective manner.”

Rate Regulation

Under their concession agreements, public regime service providers are required to offer basic local fixed-line plans to users. Rates for the basic long-distance services plan originated and terminated on fixed lines vary in accordance with certain criteria. The concession agreements establish aprice-cap mechanism for annual rate adjustments for basic service plans and basic domestic long-distance plans based on formulas set forth in each provider’s concession agreement. The formula provides for two adjustments to the price cap based on the local rate basket, the long-distance rate basket and the use of a price index. The price cap is first revised upward to reflect increases in inflation, as measured by an index, then ANATEL applies a productivity discount factor, or Factor X, which reduces the impact of the rate readjustment provided by the index.

Factor X is equal to (1) 50% of the increase in the productivity rate of public regime providers, plus (2) 75% of a factor calculated by ANATEL that is designed to reflect cost optimization targets for the telecommunications industry as a whole. If the weighted average productivity rate is negative, ANATEL will not allow an annual adjustment in excess of the IST.

A provider may increase rates for individual services within the local rate basket or the long-distance rate basket by up to 5% more than the IST so long as the rates for other services in that rate basket are reduced to the extent necessary to ensure that the weighted average increase for the entire rate basket does not exceed the permitted annual rate adjustment.

A provider may also offer alternative plans in addition to the basic service plan. Alternative plans must be submitted for ANATEL’s approval. The rates offered under the alternative plans may be adjusted annually based on the IST.

Local Rates

. Our revenues from local fixed-line services consist mainly of monthly subscription charges, charges for local calls and charges for the activation of lines for new subscribers or subscribers that have changed addresses. Monthly subscription charges are based on the plan to which the customer subscribes and whether the customer is a residential, commercial or trunk line customer.

Under our concession agreements, we are required to offer two local fixed-line plans to users: the Basic Plan per Minute and the Mandatory Alternative Service Plan. In addition to the Basic Plan per Minute and the Mandatory Alternative Service Plan, we are permitted to offernon-discriminatory alternative plans to the basic service plans. The rates for applicable services under these plans must be submitted for ANATEL approval prior to offering those plans to our customers. Historically, ANATEL has generally not raised objections to the terms of these plans.

On an annual basis, ANATEL increases or decreases the maximum rates that we are permitted to charge for our basic service plans. In addition, we are authorized to adjust the rates applicable to our alternative plans annually by no more than the rate of inflation, as measured by the Telecommunications Services Index (Índice de Serviços de Telecomunicações – IST), or IST. Discounts from the rates set in basic service plans and alternative service plans may be granted to customers without ANATEL approval.

Local FixedLine-to-Mobile Rates(VC-1) and Mobile Long Distance Rates(VC-2 andVC-3).

When one of our fixed-line customers makes a call to a mobile subscriber of our company or another mobile services provider that terminates in the mobile registration area in which the call was originated, we charge our fixed-line customerper-minute charges for the duration of the call based on rates designated by ANATEL asVC-1 rates. In turn, we pay the mobile services provider aper-minute charge based on rates designated by ANATEL as mobile termination, or MTR, rates for the use of its mobile network in completing the call. Rates for long-distance calls that originate or terminate on mobile telephones are based on whether the call is an intrasectorial long-distance call, which is charged at rates designated by ANATEL asVC-2 rates, or an intersectorial long-distance call, which is charged at rates designated by ANATEL asVC-3 rates. If the caller selects one of our carrier selection codes for the call, we receive the revenues from the call and must pay interconnection fees to the service providers that operate the networks on which the call originates and terminates.VC-1,VC-2 andVC-3 rates, collectively, the “VC Rates” vary depending on the time of the day and day of the week, and are applied on aper-minute basis. On an annual basis, ANATEL may increase or decrease the maximum VC Rates that we are permitted to charge.

FixedLine-to-Fixed-Line Long Distance Rates

. If a caller selects one of our carrier selection codes for a long-distance call that originates and terminates on fixed-line telephones, we receive the revenues from the call and must pay interconnection fees to the service providers that operate the networks on which the call originates and terminates. Rates for these long-distance calls are based on the physical distance separating callers (which are categorized by four distance ranges), time of the day and day of the week, and are applied on aper-minute basis for the duration of the call. On an annual basis, ANATEL increases or decreases the maximum domestic fixedline-to-fixed line long-distance rates that we are permitted to charge.

For more information about the rates applicable to our fixed-line services, see “—Rates, Billing and Collection—Rates.”

Quality Regulation

General Plan on Quality Goals (PGMQ)(RGQ)

The PGMQRGQ for fixed-line voice services was approved by ANATEL in December 2012 and became effective in June 2013. Each fixed-line service provider operating under the public regime or the private regime must comply with the provisions of the PGMQ.RGQ. All costs related to compliance with the quality goals established by the PGMQRGQ must be borne exclusively by the service provider. The PGMQRGQ establishes minimum quality standards with regard to:

 

customer complaints;

 

responses to repair requests;

 

responses to change of address requests;

rate of call completion; and

 

quality of public telephones.

These quality standards are measured according to the definitions and quality indicators established by ANATEL. The indicators, as well as their respective methods of collection, calculation and other quality requirements, are defined in specific regulations published by ANATEL.

ANATEL measures the performance of fixed-line service providers in each individual state in which they operate. As a result, the performance of fixed-line service providers in any particular state may not meet one or more quality performance targets even if such service provider’s overall performance is satisfactory. For cases in which there are indications of performance or conduct other than those established in the regulations, ANATEL establishes a noncompliance process called Procedure for Determination ofNon-Compliance to Obligations (Procedimento de Apuração de Descumprimento de Obrigações – PADO) in detriment to the provider. Therefore, fixed-line service providers, including us, could be subject to fines or penalties as a result of the failure to meet the quality performance targets in one or more particular area codes.

In November 2017, ANATEL submitted for public consultation the Quality of Telecommunications Services Regulation (Regulamento de Qualidade dos Serviços de Telecomunicações), or RQUAL, a proposal to review the methods by which the quality standards for fixed-line services, personal mobility services, multimedia communications services and subscription television services are measured.measured, for public consultation. In December 2019, ANATEL approved the RQUAL, which immediately superseded certain provisions of the RGQ obligations. However, the majority of the provisions of the RQUAL are not expected to be implemented until 2021, as provided for in the regulation. For more information, see “—Other Regulatory Matters—Quality of Telecommunications Services Regulation (RQUAL).”

Mobile Telephone Services

Regulatory Overview

In September 2000, ANATEL adopted regulations that established operating rules for providers under the personal mobile service (Serviço Móvel Pessoal—SMP) regime. The regulations permitted ANATEL to grant authorizations to provide mobile telecommunications services under the personal mobile service regime. For purposes of the personal mobile service regulations, Brazil is divided into three service regions covering the same geographic areas as the concessions for fixed-line telecommunications services.

Auction of 3G Spectrum

. In preparation for auctions of spectrum in Bands F, G, I and J (2.1 GHz), the use of which allows personal mobile services providers to offer 3G services to their customers, ANATEL issued regulations that divide the Brazilian territory into nine regions for purposes of operations using these frequency bands. In December 2007, ANATEL auctioned radiofrequency licenses to operate on each of these frequency bands in each of the nine regions and the related licenses to use these frequency bands. In this auction, we acquired the radio frequency licenses necessary to offer 3G services in two of the nine regions delineated by ANATEL for 3G services (corresponding to Regions II under the personal mobile services regime), and TNL PCS acquired radio frequency licenses necessary to offer 3G services in sixeight of the nine regions delineated by ANATEL for 3G services (corresponding to Regions I, II and III under the personal mobile services regime, other than an area in Region III that consists of 23 municipalities in the interior of the State of São Paulo that includes the city of Franca and surrounding areas).

Authorizations to Use 450 MHz Band and 2.5 GHz Band

. In preparation for auctions of the 450MHz band and 2.5 GHz band, the use of which allows personal mobile services providers to offer 4G services to their customers, ANATEL issued regulations that divided the Brazilian territory into three regions for purposes of providing personal mobile services. In June 2012, ANATEL auctioned radio frequency licenses to operate and the related licenses to use the frequency bands in the following manner: (1) four national lots for 2.5 GHz bands, each accompanied by a regional band of 450 MHz, and (2) 132 regional lots for 2.5GHz bands.bands, including “P” band radiofrequencies. In this auction, we acquired (1) one of the national lots for 2.5 GHz and the corresponding regional lot of 450MHz to provide rural broadband services in the States of Goiás, Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul and the Federal District, and (2) 11 regional lots for 2.5 GHz bands“P” band radiofrequencies. Since that time, we have waived our right to provide personal mobile services in the following areas: interior of Ceará, the capital use and/or Roraima (and its metropolitan area), the State of Amapá, the capital of Bahia (and its metropolitan area), interior of the State of Pará, the capital of Pernambuco (and its metropolitan area), interior of Paraná, the capital of Rio Grande do Sul (and its metropolitan area), the City of Jaguarão (and its metropolitan area) and the capital of São Paulo (and its metropolitan area).

chosen not to renew our “P” band authorizations.

Network Sharing

. In 2013, ANATEL and Brazil’s national competition regulator (Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica), or CADE, approved the 2013 RAN Sharing Agreement between TIM and Oi, which has been implemented, for the construction, implementation and mutual assignment of network tools to support personal mobile services (voice and broadband) in the 2.5 GHz band, among others, in order to ensure compliance with the scope of 4G commitments.

In 2014, TIM and Oi agreed to negotiate the joint construction, implementation and reciprocal assignment of elements of their respective 2G and 3G network infrastructures, which was approved by ANATEL and CADE.

In 2015, ANATEL and CADE approved the 2015 RAN Sharing Agreement between Telefônica Brasil, TIM and Oi, which has been implemented, for the construction, implementation and mutual assignment of network tools to support personal mobile services (voice and broadband) in the 2.5 GHz band, among others, in order to ensure compliance with the scope of commitments. With respect to the latter agreement, ANATEL rejected the proposal to conduct RAN sharing in conurbations however, because it detected interference in the service. As a result, ANATEL will not allow RAN sharing in municipalities experiencing interference until a solution has been found.

In 2018, ANATEL and CADE approved an amendment to the 2013 RAN Sharing Agreement between TIM and Oi, which has been implemented, to update the technology covered by the agreement and to permit infrastructure sharing in the 1800 MHz spectrum technology.

Our Authorizations

We hold radiofrequency spectrum authorizations to provide 2G, 3G and 4G services in Regions I, II and III. The majority of these authorizations grant us permission to use the applicable radio spectrum for 15 years from the date of the authorization agreement under which they are granted and are renewable for additional15-year terms. Upon renewal of any of these authorizations and on every second anniversary of such renewal, we will be required to pay an amount equal to 2.0% of our prior year’s net operating revenue from personal mobile services. The initial terms of one of our radio frequency spectrum authorizations expired in 2016 and was extended for an additional 15 year15-year term. Following the passage of Law No. 13,879 in October 2019, mobile telephone service providers may renew their radiofrequency spectrum authorizations indefinitely without undergoing new auctions. However, there is doubt as to whether this new framework will be applicable for authorizations in effect at the time of the law was changed. As a result, we cannot be certain that we will be able to renew our existing authorizations indefinitely without undergoing new auctions.

The following table sets forth certain information about our authorizations to provide mobile telephone services:

 

Termination Date

Geographic Scope

  

900 MHz

 

1,800 MHz

(1)
 

2,100 MHz
(3G)

  

2,600 MHz 2,600MHz
(4G)(5)(2)(3)

Rio de Janeiro, Espírito Santo, Minas Gerais, Amazonas, Roraima, Amapá, Pará, Maranhão, Bahia, Sergipe, Piauí, Ceará, Rio Grande do Norte, Paraíba, Pernambuco and Alagoas  March 2031*  April 2023  October 2027
Rio de Janeiro, Bahia, Ceará, Minas Gerais and Pernambuco(1)(4)   March 2031*   
Amazonas, Alagoas, Paraíba, Piauí e Rio Grande do Norte, Pará, Maranhão, Roraima, Espírito Santo, Bahia and Sergipe   March 2031*   
Acre, Goiás, Mato Grosso do Sul, Mato Grosso, Rondônia, Tocantins, Federal District, Paraná, Santa Catarina and Rio Grande de Sul  December 2032* December 2032* April 2023  
Mato Grosso and Goiás(2)(5)    April 2023  
Federal District Mato Grosso, Paraná, Rio Grande do Sul, Tocantins, Acre, Santa Catarina, Rondônia, Mato Grosso do Sul, Goiás(3)(6)   April 2023   October 2027
São Paulo  December 2022(4)(7) December 2022 April 2023  October 2027

 

*

The expiration dates of these licenses have already been extended and these licenses are not eligible for additional extensions.

(1)

We have secondary use of 1,800 MHz radiofrequencies under authorizations provided to TIM in Minas Gerais, Pernambuco, Sergipe, Ceará, Santa Catarina e Goiás, with the same termination dates as the underlying authorizations granted to TIM (from April 2023 through April 2028).

(2)

We no longer have authorizations for the “P” Band.

(3)

We have secondary use ofsub-bands “X” and “VI” in the 2.5 GHz radiofrequencies under authorizations provided to Telefônica and TIM in all of Brazil, with the same termination dates as the underlying authorizations granted to Telefônica and TIM.

(4)

Sector 1 of the State of Rio de Janeiro; sectors 2 and 3 of the State of Minas Gerais; sector 5 of the State of Bahia; sector 8 of the State of Pernambuco; and sector 11 of the State of Ceará.

(2)(5)

“H” Band “H” Sector 22 (Paranaíba/MS) and Sector 25 (municipalities of Buriti Alegre, Cachoeira Dourada, Inaciolândia, Itumbiara, Paranaiguara and São Simão in the State of Goiás).

(3)(6)

Sub-band F.“F.” except in the States of Paranaíba and Mato Grosso do Sul and the municipalities of Buriti Alegre, Cachoeira Dourada, Inaciolândia, Itumbiara, Paranaiguara and São Simão in the State of Goiás.

(4)(7)

Except AR11 and sector 33.

(5)

We have secondary use ofsub-bands X and VI in the 2.5 GHz radiofrequencies under authorizations provided to Telefônica and TIM in all of Brazil, with the same termination dates as the underlying authorizations.

Our authorization agreements are also subject to network scope and contains service performance obligations set forth in these authorization agreements, under which we are required to service all municipalities in Brazil with a population in excess of 100,000 habitants.

Under our 3G authorizations, as of the date of this annual report we are also currently required to (1) provide service to 459 municipalities that did not have mobile services at the time these licenses were granted with either 2G or 3G mobile telecommunications services, (2) provide 3G service to 50% of all of the municipalities with a population between 30,000 and 100,000, and (3) provide 3G service to 60% of the municipalities, including 684 specified municipalities, covered by these licenses with a population less than 30,000.

Under our 4G authorizations, as of the date of this annual report we are also currently required to provide 4G service in (1) all municipalities with a population of 30,000 or more and (2) 60% by December 31, 2018 and 100% by December 31, 2019 of the municipalities covered by these licenses with a population less than 30,000; provided, however, that for the latter, we may comply with this obligation by providing service with transmission rates equal to or greater than those set for the 1.9/2.1 GHz or above;(3G) bands;

In 2012 we acquired 450 MHz license on the 4G services auction, which requires us to, in 964 municipalities in the States of Goiás, Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul and the Federal District: (1) provide voice services in the 450 MHz or other spectrum granted to us and data services at minimum upload speeds of 256 kbps and download speeds of 1 Mbps and a minimum monthly allowance of 500 MB;MB in rural areas; (2) provide unlimited data services at minimum upload speeds of 256 kbps and download speeds of 1 Mbps to rural schools in those municipalities; and (3) make our fixed-line network available to other telecommunications service providers to allow them to comply with their obligations under the PGMU.

As of the date of this annual report, although we believe that we are in compliance with the network scope and service performance obligations set forth in these licenses, ANATEL is currently debating our compliance with certain obligations to provide services under the 450 MHz spectrums. Since we dodid not yet have all of the necessary systems in place to support the use of the 450 MHz spectrum using land frequencies by the required deadline, we have been meeting our coverage obligations in certain areas using satellites. If ANATEL decidesmakes a final decision that we have not been meeting our obligations, our authorizations to use 450 MHz frequencies may be terminated. As of the date of this annual report, ANATEL’s determination regarding this matter is suspended by court order.

For most obligations, a municipality is considered “serviced” when the covered service area contains at least 80% of the urban area in the municipality. Our failure to meet these targets may result in the imposition of penalties established in ANATEL regulations and, in extreme circumstances, in termination of our authorizations to use those radiofrequencies by ANATEL. As of the date of this prospectus,annual report, although we believe that we are in compliance with the network scope and service performance obligations set forth in these authorization agreements, ANATEL has not yet made its final determination with respect to our compliance with certain obligations to provide services under the 450 MHz/900 MHz/1800 MHz/2100 and 2500 MHz spectrums. Furthermore, we have obtained judicial protection under the RJ Proceedings to forego renewal of many of the performance guarantees we would have otherwise been required to maintain with respect to the obligations under discussion.

Our 4G radio frequency authorizations also impose minimum investment obligations in domestic technologies. At least 65% of the cost of all goods, services, equipment, telecommunications systems and data networks that we purchase to meet our 4G service obligations must be developed in Brazil. As of the date of this annual report, ANATEL has recognized that our obligations to use domestic technology have not been met in the past due to the unavailability of such products in Brazil, and has consequently not sanctioned us. This minimum requirement will increase to 70% by December 31, 2022.

Roaming

Under the PGMC, a mobile services provider with significant market power, such as our company, must offer roaming services to other mobile services providers without significant market power at the maximum rate that the mobile services provider with significant market power is permitting ANATEL to offer such services to its retail customers.

In March 2017, ANATEL began a pilot program with the four principal mobile services providers, including our company, to share infrastructure costs to expand the existing voice roaming agreements to voice and data roaming services to 35 municipalities with fewer than 30,000 residents. As a result of this program, which is ongoing and is in the process of expansion to include additional mobile service providers and additional municipalities with fewer than 30,000 residents, the providers began or resumed discussions about voice and data roaming tariffs and the timeline to implement the requirements of the program. As of the date of this prospectus,annual report, certain providers, including our company, have entered into bilateral agreements regarding these matters, and new municipalities count on roaming coverage, increasing satisfaction to our clients.

Rate Regulation

Mobile telecommunications service in Brazil unlike in the United States, is offered on a “calling-party-pays” basis under which a mobile subscriber pays only for calls that he or she originates (in addition to roaming charges paid on calls made or received outside the subscriber’s home registration area). A mobile subscriber receiving a collect call is also required to pay mobile usage charges.

Our revenues from mobile services consist mainly of charges for local and long-distance calls and data packages paid by ourpre-paid and post-paid mobile subscribers and monthly subscription charges paid by our post-paid plan subscribers. Monthly subscription charges are based on a post-paid subscriber’s service plan. If one of our mobile subscribers places or receives a call from a location outside of his or her home registration area, we are permitted to charge that customer the applicable roaming rate. We charge for all mobile calls made by ourpre-paid customers, and for mobile calls made by our post-paid customers in excess of their allocated monthly number of minutes, on aper-minute basis. Rates under our mobile plans may be adjusted annually by no more than the rate of inflation, as measured by theIGP-DI.

Quality Regulation

Our personal mobile services authorizations impose obligations on us to meet quality of service standards relating to our network’s ability to make and receive calls, call failure rates, capacity to handle peak periods, failed interconnection of calls and customer complaints.standards.

To restructure the process of assessing the quality of mobile service, with the inclusion of processes and measurement of indicators to check the quality of mobile broadband and the quality perceived by the user, ANATEL published Resolution 575/2011, approving the Regulation for the Management of Quality of Provision of Personal Mobile Service (Regulamento de Gestão da Qualidade da Prestação de Serviço Móvel Pessoal), orSMP-RGQ.

TheSMP-RGQ provides for the assessment of the network connection and their respective data transmission rate, assessing aspects of availability, stability and connection speed for the data network. Targets are defined as 80% of speed hired (on average per month) by users and 40% of the instant speed, according to the definitions of the Resolution 575/2011.

In January 2018, ANATEL adopted a new model for measuring the quality of mobile broadband networks through the use of smartphones, replacing the previous model that required data from volunteers and often led to statistically insignificant results. The new model, which we have adopted by collecting user data directly from smartphones using theMinha Oiapplication, allows us to better manage the quality of our network, allowing us to identify corrective actions and more efficiently direct investments in our network.

As a result, the performance of mobile telephony service providers in any particular state may not meet one or more quality performance targets even if such service provider’s overall performance is satisfactory. For cases in which there are indications of performance or conduct other than those established in the regulations, ANATEL establishes a noncompliance process called Procedure for Determination ofNon-Compliance to Obligations (Procedimento de Apuração de Descumprimento de Obrigações – PADO) in detriment to the provider. Therefore, mobile telephony service providers, including us, could be subject to fines or penalties as a result of the failure to meet the quality performance targets in one or more particular area codes.

In November 2017, ANATEL submitted for public consultation the RQUAL, a proposal to review the methods by which the quality standards for fixed-line services, personal mobility services, multimedia communications services and subscription television services are measured. In December 2019, ANATEL approved the RQUAL, which immediately superseded certain provisions of theSMP-RGQ obligations. However, the majority of the provisions of the RQUAL are not expected to be implemented until 2021, as provided for in the regulation. For more information, see “—Other“ —Other Regulatory Matters—Quality of Telecommunications Services Regulation (RQUAL).”

Multimedia Communication Services

Our Authorizations

We have national Multimedia Communication ServicesService (Serviço de Comunicação Multimídia – SCM) authorizations, which superseded our prior Telecommunications Network Transportation Services (Serviço de Rede de Transporte de Telecomunicações) authorizations, permitting us to provide high speed data service.

The Multimedia Communication Services authorizations became effective in May 2003 and cover the same geographical areas as our concession and personal communication service agreements. In April 2008, in connection with the amendments to our fixed-line services concessions, we agreed to provide internet service free of charge until December 31, 2025 to all urban schools in the areas of our concession agreements.

Rate Regulation

A significant portion of our revenues from commercial data transmission services are generated by monthly charges for EILD and SLD services, which are based on contractual arrangements for the use of part of our networks. Under ANATEL regulations, we are required to make publicly available the forms of agreements that we use for EILD and SLD services, including the applicable rates, and are only permitted to offer these services under these forms of agreements. ANATEL publishes reference rates for these services and if one of our customers objects to the rates that we charge for these services, that customer is entitled to seek to reduce the applicable rate through arbitration before ANATEL.

ANATEL is expected to publishespublish new reference rates for these services in 2020 reflecting a methodology that takes into consideration alllong-run incremental costs, updated to current values, of providing a particular service and the unit costs of such service based on an efficient network considering our existing regulatory obligations.

Broadband services, IP services and frame relay services are market oriented but may still be subject to ANATEL regulation.

Quality Regulation

In June 2011, the President of Brazil issued Executive Decree No. 7,512/11, which mandated ANATEL to take the necessary regulatory measures to establish quality standards for broadband internet services. In compliance with such decree, on October 31, 2011, ANATEL published Resolution 574/2011 approving the Multimedia CommunicationsCommunication Service Quality Management Regulations (Regulamentação de Gestão da Qualidade do Serviço de Comunicação Multimídia), which identify network quality indicators and establish performance goals for multimedia communications service providers, including broadband internet service providers, with more than 50,000 subscribers. Such providers will be required to collect representative data using dedicated equipment installed at the site of each network connection and be subject to periodic measurements to ensure their compliance with such regulation, including:

individual upload and download speeds of at least 40% of contracted speeds per measurement for at least 95% of all measurements;

 

average upload and download speeds of at least 80% of contracted speeds for all measurements; and

 

individual round-trip latencies for fixed-line connections of up to 80 milliseconds per measurement for at least 95% of the measurements.

To increase transparency, customers must be provided with specialized software at no cost to measure their own network quality, although such customer-generated measurements will be included in official calculations.

In January 2018, ANATEL adopted new models for measuring the quality of fixed broadband networks using automated processes that collect data from multiple data points. To measure our fixed broadband network quality, we have implemented the HDM platform. This new method allowallows us to better manage the quality of our network, allowing us to identify corrective actions and more efficiently direct investments in our network.

Nevertheless, the performance of fixed broadband service providers in any particular state may not meet one or more quality performance targets even if such service provider’s overall performance is satisfactory. For cases in which there are indications of performance or conduct other than those established in the regulations, ANATEL establishes a noncompliance process called Procedure for Determination ofNon-Compliance to Obligations (Procedimento de Apuração de Descumprimento de Obrigações – PADO) in detriment to the provider. Therefore, fixed broadband service providers, including us, could be subject to fines or penalties as a result of the failure to meet the quality performance targets in one or more particular states.

In November 2017, ANATEL submitted for public consultation the RQUAL, a proposal to review the methods by which the quality standards for fixed-line services, personal mobility services, multimedia communications services and subscription television services are measured. In December 2019, ANATEL approved the RQUAL, which immediately superseded certain provisions of the existing quality regulation applicable to multimedia communications service providers. However, the majority of the provisions of the RQUAL are not expected to be implemented until 2021, as provided for in the regulation. For more information, see “—Other“ —Other Regulatory Matters—Quality of Telecommunications Services Regulation (RQUAL).”

Subscription Television Services

Regulatory Overview

The framework established by Law No. 12,485 of 2011 increased the availability and lowered the price of subscription television services in Brazil, through increased competition among providers, and improved the quality, speed and availability of broadband internet services as a result of the expected proliferation of fiber optic cables used to transmit cable television.

In March 2012, ANATEL adopted new regulations under which the authorizations to provide various existing subscription television services have been consolidated into authorizations to provide a newly-defined service called Conditional Access Service (Serviço de Acesso Condicionado – SeAC). Under these regulations, authorizations to provide Conditional Access Service apply to private telecommunications services, the receipt of which are conditioned on payment by subscribers, for the distribution of audiovisual contents in the form of packages, individual channels and channels with required programming, by means of any communications technology, processes, electronic means or protocols. An authorization granted by ANATEL to provide Conditional Access Service will be valid for the entire Brazilian territory; however, the provider must indicate in its application for an authorization the localities that it will service.

Our Authorizations

In November 2008, we entered into a15-year authorization agreement with ANATEL that governs our use of satellite technology to provide DTH satellite television services throughout Brazil. Under this authorization, we are required to furnish equipment to certain public institutions, to make channels available for broadcasting by specified public institutions, and to comply with quality of service obligations set forth in applicable ANATEL regulations.

In December 2012, ANATEL granted our request to convert our DTH authorization agreement into a Conditional Access Service (SeAC) authorization allowing us to provide nationwide subscription television services through any technology, including satellite, wireline, optical fiber and coaxial cable. The Conditional Access Service authorization agreement authorized us to offer the services to be governed by such agreement, including IP TV, and has no termination date. In accordance with Law No. 12,485/11, which approved the Conditional Access Service regime, our Conditional Access Service authorization prohibits us from creating television content or owning more than 30% of a company that creates content. We are also required to carry a certain percentage of Brazilian programming, including open channels and public access channels.

Rate Regulation

The rates and prices for DTH and IP TV services are not subject to ANATEL regulation and are market-driven.

Quality Regulation

The quality of service onPay-TV (SeAC) is monitored by ANATEL through the operational and network performance indicators for telecom operators.

ANATEL. These quality standards are measured according to the definitions and quality indicators established by Resolution 411/2005. The indicators, as well as their respective methods of collection, calculation and other quality requirements, measures the performance ofPay-TV service providers in each individual geographic area in which they operate. As a result, the performance ofPay-TV service providers in any particular geographic area may not meet one or more quality performance targets even if such service provider’s overall performance is satisfactory.

For cases in which there are indications of performance or conduct other than those established in the regulations, ANATEL establishes a noncompliance process called Procedure for Determination ofNon-Compliance to Obligations (Procedimento de Apuração de Descumprimento de Obrigações – PADO) in detriment to the provider. Therefore,Pay-TV service providers, including us, could be subject to fines or penalties as a result of the failure to meet the quality performance targets in in each geographic area in which they operate.

In November 2017, ANATEL submitted for public consultation the RQUAL, a proposal to review the methods by which the quality standards for fixed-line services, personal mobility services, multimedia communications services and subscription television services are measured. In December 2019, ANATEL approved the RQUAL, which immediately superseded certain provisions of the existing quality regulation applicable to subscription television service providers. However, the majority of the provisions of the RQUAL are not expected to be implemented until 2021, as provided for in the regulation. For more information, see “—Other“ —Other Regulatory Matters—Quality of Telecommunications Services Regulation (RQUAL).”

Other Regulatory Matters

Consumer Protection Regulation

In March 2014, ANATEL published a regulation approving the General Regulation on Telecommunications Customers Rights (Regulamento Geral de Direitos do Consumidor de Serviços de Telecomunicações), a single regulation for the telecommunications sector with general rules for customer service, billing, and service offers, which are applicable to fixed, mobile, broadband andPay-TV customers. This regulation establishes a period ranging from 120 days to 24 months from the date of publication for entering into compliance with the new rules. Most of the new rules that expand the rights of those who use the telecommunications services entered into force on July 8, 2014. Our failure to comply with this regulation may result in various fines and penalties being imposed on us by ANATEL.

Interconnection Regulations

Under the General Telecommunications Law, all telecommunications service providers are required, if technically feasible, to make their networks available for interconnection on anon-discriminatory basis whenever a request is made by another telecommunications service provider. Interconnection permits a call originated on the network of a requesting fixed-line or personal mobile services provider’s network to be terminated on the fixed-line or personal mobile services network of the other provider. ANATEL has adopted the General Rules on Interconnection (Regulamento Geral de Interconexão) to implement these requirements.

Interconnection Regulations Applicable to Fixed-Line Service Providers

Our revenues from the use of our local fixed-line networks by other telecommunications services providers consist primarily of payments at rates designated by ANATEL asTU-RL rates from:

 

long-distance service providers to complete calls terminating on our local fixed-line networks;

 

long-distance service providers for the transfer to their networks of calls originating on our local fixed-line networks; and

 

mobile services providers to complete calls terminating on our local fixed-line networks.

Fixed-line service providers are not permitted to charge other fixed-line service providers for local fixed-line calls originating on their local fixed-line networks and terminating on the other provider’s local fixed-line networks.

Our revenues from the use of our long-distance networks consist primarily of payments at rates designated by ANATEL asTU-RIU rates from other long-distance carriers that use a portion of our long-distance networks to complete calls initiated by callers that have not selected us as the long-distance provider. Historically, ourTU-RIU rates have been equal to 20% of our domestic fixedline-to-fixed line long-distance rates for such calls.

TU-RL andTU-RIU rates vary depending on the time of the day and day of the week and are subject to price caps established by ANATEL. The price cap for interconnection rates varies from service provider to service provider based on the retail prices of each service provider and are adjusted annually by ANATEL at the same time that rates for local and long-distance calls are adjusted. Fixed-line service providers must offer the sameTU-RL andTU-RIU rates to all requesting providers on a nondiscriminatory basis.

The maximumTU-RL andTU-RIU rates that ANATEL has permitted us to charge have declined significantly since 2016. In December 2018, ANATEL published the maximum fixed reference rates, includingTU-RL andTU-RIU, for 2020 through 2023, using a methodology that takes into consideration alllong-run incremental costs, updated to current values, of providing a particular service and the unit costs of such service based on an efficient network considering our existing regulatory obligations.

Interconnection Regulations Applicable to Personal Mobile Services Providers

Our revenues from the use of our mobile networks by other telecommunications services providers consist primarily of payments on aper-minute basis from (1) local fixed-line, long-distance and mobile services providers to complete calls terminating on our mobile networks, and (2) long-distance service providers for the transfer to their networks of calls originating on our mobile networks.

The terms and conditions of interconnection to our mobile networks, including the rates charged to terminate calls on these mobile networks, which are designated by ANATEL as MTR rates, the commercial conditions and technical terms and conditions, may be freely negotiated between us and other mobile and fixed-line telecommunications service providers, subject to compliance with regulations established by ANATEL relating to traffic capacity and interconnection infrastructure that must be made available to requesting providers, among other things.

Personal mobile services providers must offer the same MTR rate to all requesting providers on a nondiscriminatory basis. InterconnectionANATEL must determine that the intercompany agreements must be approved by ANATELmeet certain formal requirements before they become effective andeffective. These agreements may be rejected if they are contrary to the principles of free competition and the applicable regulations. If the providers cannot agree upon the terms and conditions of the interconnection agreements, ANATEL may determine terms and conditions by arbitration. Since no agreement with fixed-line service providers could be reached regarding MTR rates when we began offering personal mobile services, ANATEL set the initial MTR rates.

The maximum MTR rates that ANATEL has permitted us to charge have declined significantly since 2016. In December 2018, ANATEL published the maximum fixed reference rates includingTU-RL andTU-RIU, for 2020 through 2023, using a methodology that takes into consideration alllong-run incremental costs, updated to current values, of providing a particular service and the unit costs of such service based on an efficient network considering our existing regulatory obligations.

Quality of Telecommunications Services Regulation (RQUAL)

In November 2017, ANATEL submitted for public consultation the RQUAL, a proposal to review the methods by which the quality standards for fixed-line services, personal mobility services, multimedia communications services and subscription television services are measured. UnderIn December 2019, ANATEL approved the proposal,RQUAL, which established a new quality management model and immediately superseded certain provisions of the quality regulations then in existence. In addition, the RQUAL provides standardized rules regarding communications and reimbursement to users impacted by service interruptions.

Pursuant to the new model, telecommunications services providers will be evaluated on the basis of three indices: (1) service quality; (2) perceived quality; and (3) user complaints. Providers will be given annual grades, ranging from “A” (best) to “E” (worst), at the national, state and municipal levels. Customers whose providers receive “E” grades will be able to break their contracts without paying a fine regardless of the length of the contract or remaining term. The RQUAL will also replace the existing sanctioning regime. Providers will no longer automatically receive fines for not complying with quality targets. The RQUAL also provides for the replacement of the automatic sanctioning rules (fines fornon-compliance with targets), by the adoption of specific measures and appropriate to the specific case, in order to guarantee the improvement of quality standards.

The RQUAL provides for the creation of a technical quality group, including representatives from ANATEL and various service providers, and a quality assessment support entity, with the aim of creating a manual that defines the technical parameters that will comprise the quality indicators wouldand establishes the criteria for service interruptions and reimbursements. ANATEL’s board of directors will then be standardized and simplified for consumer use, withrequired to approve the goals of assisting consumersmanual, which is expected to make informed decisions aboutbecome effective in 2021. At that time, the prior quality and improving competition for qualityregulations applicable to telecommunications services providers, including the RGQ, among telecommunications providers. The public consultation period ended in April 2018, and we expect that the RQUALothers, will be approved in 2019.revoked and fully superseded by the RQUAL.

General Plan on Competition Targets (PGMC)

The PGMC, which was approved by ANATEL, and became effective in November 2012 and was updated in July 2018, contemplates the creation of one entity to manage information about telecommunications networks, act as an intermediary in contracts between telecommunications providers and supervise the offering of wholesale data traffic services. The PGMC also addresses a variety of other matters relating to both fixed-line and mobile service providers, including criteria for the evaluation of telecommunications providers to determine which providers have significant market power and price regulations applicable to the wholesale markets for trunk lines, backhaul, access to internet backboneproducts, including EILD services, passive pipeline and subduct infrastructure, fixed line interconnection services, mobile interconnection services, roaming, high-speed data, and regulations relatedinfrastructure for data transmitted through copper wires at speeds of 12 Mbps or less. The evaluation framework also takes into account the providers’ market position in several retail markets in which we participate. Under this framework, municipalities are categorized according to partial unbundling and/or full unbundlingdegree of competition present: competitive, moderately competitive, potentially competitive and not competitive. ANATEL then regulates companies based on the local fixed-line networksdegree of the public regime service providers.competition present in each municipality.

The PGMC imposes stricter restrictions on providers that are deemed to have significant market power in a particular geographic area, ranging from a neighborhood within a municipality to the entire national territory. In order to determine whether a provider has significant market power, ANATEL established criteria that consider:

 

that provider’s market share in particular mobile interconnectionthe retail market and the wholesale markets and personal mobile servicesrelated to the retail market;

 

the economies of scope and scale available to that provider;

 

that provider’s dominance over infrastructure that is not economically viable to duplicate; and

 

that provider’s concurrent operations in the wholesale and retail markets.

In December 2016, ANATEL launchedAs of the date of this annual report, Oi is considered to be a public consultation process to review proposed changes to the PGMC, including establishing new criteria to determine significant market power and creating a new competition framework.

In July 2018, ANATEL updated the PGMC to revise the criteria to determine which telecommunications providers haveservice provider with significant market power in most of the various wholesale markets that we serve. The revised evaluation framework also takes into account providers’cities in Brazil, except in the mobile interconnection market, positionwhere Oi has significant market power only in several retail markets in which we participate. Under this new framework, municipalities are categorized according to degree of competition present: competitive, moderately competitive, potentially competitive and not competitive. ANATEL then regulates companies based on the degree of competition present in each municipality. The 2018 amendments to the PGMC also updated the price regulations applicable to wholesale products including EILD services, interconnection, full unbudling, bitstream, national roaming, pipelines and subducts, high capacity data transport and fixed network infrastructure usage.

Region I.

Infrastructure Sharing

Prior to the adoption of the PGMC, ANATEL had established rules for partial unbundling of the local fixed-line networks of the public regime service providers, which we refer to as “line sharing,” and which (1) limited the rates service providers can charge for line sharing, and (2) addressed related matters such asco-location space requirements.Co-location means that a service provider requesting unbundling may place its switching equipment in or near the local exchange of the service provider whose network the requesting service provider wishes to use and may connect to the network at this local exchange.

The PGMC requires public regime service providers that have significant market power, such as our company, to share their fixed-line network infrastructure with other providers, including their local fixed-line access networks. Providers that are deemed to have significant market power must share their fixed access network infrastructure for transmission of data through copper wires at transmission rates of up to 12 Mbps. Providers with significant market power must also share their passive infrastructure with other service providers at prices determined by bilateral negotiations between the providers.

In addition, infrastructure sharing is governed by the Regulation of Infrastructure Sharing (Regulamento de Compartilhamento de Infraestrutura), which requires that all owners of infrastructure (who may or may not be telecommunications service providers) share their excess capacity with telecommunications service providers.

Ownership and Corporate Governance Restrictions

Over the years, ANATEL has initiated several internal proceedings to monitor our financial situation and to evaluate our ability to continue to perform our obligations under our concession agreements. In light of the approval of the RJ Plan by the creditors on December 20, 2017, and its subsequent ratification and confirmation by the RJ Court, ANATEL began to monitor our operating and financial positions based on the effectiveness of the RJ Plan.

In addition, in connection with the RJ Proceedings, ANATEL gained expanded powers regarding our ownership and corporate governance decisions. Currently, we must: (1) notify ANATEL’s Superintendence of Competition of the dates of meetings of Oi’s board of directorsIn March 2019, ANATEL determined it would continue to monitor us in 2019, and executive officers soimposed measures related to transparency, corporate governance, and financial performance. In February 2020, ANATEL informed us that it may send a representativewould suspend its monitoring activities with respect to attend such meetings, as well as submitthe RJ Plan, and we are working with ANATEL to formally end this extraordinary supervision. As it does with every telecommunications services provider whose services it regulates, ANATEL the minutes of such meetings; (2) notify ANATEL’s Superintendence of Competition of the dates of meetings of Oi’s board committees so that it may send a representativecontinues to attend such meetings; (3) obtain prior approval from ANATEL in ordermonitor us, including our ability to among other things, transfer Oi’s corporate control, including the replacement of Oi’s board of directors; (4) notify ANATEL of the sale or lien over any moveable asset of Oi or its controlling shareholders, affiliates and subsidiaries; and (5) so long as Oi isperform our obligations under judicial reorganization, request the shareholders who have indicated members to Oi’s board of directors or executive officers to inform ANATEL of possibleour concession agreements, or instruments, including those that may interfere directly or indirectly in the exercise of their control.ordinary course.

Regulatory Agenda 2019-2020

On March 21, 2019, ANATEL approved itsANATEL’s Regulatory Agenda for 2019-2020, includingwhich was approved on March 21, 2019, includes a study on the 700MHz, 2.3GHz, 3.3GHz – 3.4GHz, 3.5GHz and 26GHz radiofrequencies in preparation for the 5G spectrum auctions ANATEL expects to hold in 2020.

Environmental and Other Regulatory Matters

As part of ourday-to-day operations, we regularly install ducts for wires and cables and erect towers for transmission antennae. We may be subject to federal, state and/or municipal environmental licensing requirements due to the installation of cables along highways and railroads, over bridges, rivers and marshes and through farms, conservation units and environmental preservation areas, among other places. As of the date of this annual report, we have been required to obtain environmental licenses for the installation of transmission towers and antennae in several municipalities with no expected impact on our operations. However, there can be no assurances that other state and municipal environmental agencies will not require us to obtain environmental licenses for the installation of transmission towers and antennae in the future or that such a requirement would not have a material adverse effect on the installation costs of our network or on the speed with which we can expand and modernize our network.

We must also comply with environmental legislation regarding the management of solid waste. According to resolutions adopted by the National Environmental Council (Conselho Nacional do Meio Ambiente), companies responsible for the treatment and final disposal of solid industrial waste, special waste and solid urban waste are subject to environmental licensing. Should the waste not be disposed of in accordance with standards established by environmental legislation, the company generating such waste may be held jointly and severally liable with the company responsible for waste treatment for any damage caused. Also, in all states where we operate, we have implemented management procedures promoting the recycling of batteries, transformers and fluorescent lamps.

In addition, we are subject to ANATEL regulations that impose limits on the levels and frequency of the electromagnetic fields originating from our telecommunications transmissions stations.

We believe that we are in compliance with ANATEL standards as well as with all material environmental legislation and regulations.

Disclosure Pursuant to Section 219 of the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act

Section 219 of the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012 added Section 13(r) to the Exchange Act. Section 13(r) requires an issuer to disclose in its annual or quarterly reports filed with the SEC whether the issuer or any of its affiliates has knowingly engaged in certain activities, transactions or dealings with the Government of Iran, relating to Iran or with designated natural persons or entities involved in terrorism or the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction during the period covered by the annual or quarterly report. Disclosure is required even when the activities were conducted outside the United States bynon-U.S. entities and even when such activities were conducted in compliance with applicable law.

In December 2011, we entered into aWe have roaming agreementagreements with MTN Irancell.Irancell, Mobile Company of Iran and Rightel Communications, each of which is an Iranian mobile phone operator. Pursuant to such roaming agreement,agreements, our customers are able to roam in MTN Irancell’s networkthese mobile phone operators’ networks (outbound roaming) and customers of MTN Irancell, Mobile Company of Iran and Rightel Communications are able to roam in our network (inbound roaming). For outbound roaming, we pay MTN Irancell roaming fees for use of their network by our customers, and for inbound roaming, MTN Irancell pays uswe receive roaming fees for use of our network by its customers.

Our inbound and outbound roaming services with MTN Irancell were launched commercially in October and November 2012, respectively.network. During 2018,2019, we recorded revenues of R$9585,019 and expenses of R$1,0352,203 in connection with thisthese roaming agreement.agreements.

We do not maintain any bank accounts in Iran. All payments in connection with our international roaming agreements are effected through our bank accounts in London.

The purpose of all of these agreements is to provide our customers with coverage in areas where we do not own networks. For that purpose, we intend to continue maintaining these agreements.

We also provide telecommunications services in the ordinary course of business to the Embassy of Iran in Brasilia. In 2018,2019, we recorded gross revenues of approximately R$21,16615,700 from these services. As one of the primary providers of telecommunications services in Brasilia, we intend to continue providing such services, as we do to the embassies of many other nations.

 

ITEM 4A.

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Not applicable.

ITEM 5.

OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS

The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 20182019 and 20172018 and for the three years ended December 31, 2018,2019, which were prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP,IFRS, and the related notes, and are included in this annual report, as well as with the information presented under the sections entitled “Presentation of Financial and Other Information” and “Item 3. Key Information—Selected Financial Information.”

The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those set forth in “Cautionary Statement with Respect to Forward-Looking Statements” and “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors.”

Overview

We are one of the principal integrated telecommunications service providers in Brazil with approximately 57.153.4 million RGUs as of December 31, 2018.2019. We operate throughout Brazil and offer a range of integrated telecommunications services that include Residential Services, Personal Mobility Services and B2B Services. We are the largest fixed-line telecommunications company in Brazil in terms of total number of lines in service as of December 31, 20182019 based on our 11.810.3 million fixed lines in service as of December 31, 2018,2019, with a market share of 51.1%48.4% of the total fixed lines in service in our service areas as of that date. We own the largest fiber optic network in Brazil, with more than 360,000376,000 kilometers of installed fiber optic cable, distributed throughout Brazil. Our Personal Mobility Services business offers mobile telecommunications services throughout Brazil. As of December 31, 2018,2019, our mobile network covers areas in which approximately 94.0%94% of the Brazilian population lives and works. Based on our 37.736.8 million mobile subscribers as of December 31, 2018,2019, we had a 16.4%16.2% market share of the Brazilian mobile telecommunications market as of that date. During 2018,the year ended December 31, 2019, we recorded net operating revenue of R$22,06020,136 million and a net incomeloss of R$27,3949,095 million.

Our results of operations and financial condition have been and will be significantly influenced in future periods by the RJ Proceedings and our investment in Africatel. In addition, our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 20162017 and our financial condition as of December 31, 20182019 and 20172018 have been influenced, and our future results of operations and financial condition will continue to be influenced, by a variety of factors, including:

 

the evolution of Brazilian GDP, which grew by an estimated 1.1% during 2018the year ended December 31, 2019 and by 1.1 and 1.0% during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, and declined by 3.5% during 2016,respectively, which we believe affects demand for our services and, consequently, our net operating revenue;

 

the number of our fixed lines in service, which declined to 10.3 million as of December 31, 2019 from 11.8 million as of December 31, 2018 fromand 12.9 million as of December 31, 2017, and 13.7 million as of December 31, 2016, and the percentage of our fixed-line customers that subscribe to our alternative plans which increased to 86.7% as of December 31, 2019 from 85.8% as of December 31, 2018 fromand 85.4% as of December 31, 2017 and 85.5% as of December 31, 2016;2017;

 

the number of our mobile customers, which declined to 36.8 million as of December 31, 2019 from 37.7 million as of December 31, 2018 fromand 39.0 million as of December 31, 2017 and 42.2 million as of December 31, 2016;2017;

 

the number of our fixed-linebroadband customers, that subscribe to our broadband services, which declined to 4.7 million as of December 31, 2019 from 5.4 million as of December 31, 2018 from 5.6 million as of December 31, 2017 and 5.7 million as of December 31, 2016;2017;

 

the number of ourPay-TV customers, which remained stable atdeclined to 1.5 million as of December 31, 2019 from 1.6 million as of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 after growing from 1.31.5 million as of December 31, 2016;2017;

 

the increased competition in the Brazilian market for telecommunications services, which affects the amount of the discounts that we offer on our service rates and the quantity of services that we offer at promotional rates;

our compliance with our quality of service obligations under the PGMQRGQ and our network expansion and modernization obligations under the PGMU and our concession agreements, the amount of the fines assessed against us by ANATEL for alleged failures to meet these obligations and our success in challenging fines that we believe are assessed in error;

 

inflation rates in Brazil, which were 3.7% during 2018, 2.9% during 2017 and 6.3% during 2016, as measured by the IST, and the resulting adjustments to our regulated rates in Brazil;

inflation rates in Brazil, which were 4.3% during the year ended December 31, 2019 and were 3.7% and 2.7% during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, in each case, as measured by the IST, and the resulting adjustments to our regulated rates in Brazil, as well as the effects of inflation on ourreal-denominated debt that is indexed to take into account the effects of inflation or bears interest at rates that are partially adjusted for inflation;

 

  

changes in the exchange rates of thereal against the U.S. dollar, including the 16.9%4.0% depreciation of thereal against the U.S. dollar during 2018, the year ended December 31, 2019, and the 17.1% and 1.5% depreciation of therealagainst the U.S. dollar during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the 16.5% appreciation of therealagainst the U.S. dollar during 2016,respectively, which affects the cost inreais of a substantial portion of the network equipment that we purchase for our capital expenditure projects, the prices of which are denominated in U.S. dollars or are U.S. dollar-linked, and which affects our financial expenses as a result of exchange variations on our indebtedness denominated in U.S. dollars.dollars; and

the level of our outstanding indebtedness, fluctuations in benchmark interest rates in Brazil, principally the CDI rate and the TJLP rate, and fluctuations of the Brazilian Consumer Price Index – CPI, which affects our interest expenses on our floating rate debt.

We expect that our financial condition and liquidity will be influenced by a variety of factors, including:

 

our ability to generate cash flows from our operations;

 

our capital expenditure requirements, primarily relating to a variety of projects designed to expand and upgrade our data transmission networks, our mobile services networks, our voice transmission networks, our information technology equipment and our telecommunications services infrastructure;

 

the success of our program to monetizenon-core assets;

the existing terms of our outstanding indebtedness, which could limit our ability to raise additional funds or require us to take certain actions to manage such indebtedness;

our ability to borrow funds from Brazilian and international financial institutions and to sell our debt and equity securities in the Brazilian and international securities markets; and

 

prevailing Brazilian and international interest rates, which affect our debt service requirements.

Financial Presentation and Accounting Policies

Presentation of Financial Statements

We have prepared our audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 and for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 in accordance with U.S. GAAP,IFRS as issued by the IASB under the assumption that we will continue as a going concern.concern and in compliance with the legal requirements applicable to a judicial reorganization. Our audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 and for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 have been audited in accordance with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or PCAOB, standards.

The RJ Proceedings are aimed at ensuring the continuation of our company as a going concern. This continuity was strengthened with the approval of the RJ Plan and, as a result, the borrowings and financing were novated and the related balances were recalculated under the terms and conditions of the RJ Plan. The continuity of our company as a going concern is ultimately depending on the successful outcome of the RJ Proceedings and the realization of other forecasts of our company.

Under U.S. GAAP, our management is required to assess whetherOur company has been successfully discharging the obligations set forth in the RJ Proceedings and even though there are no indications in this regard, we emphasize that these conditions or events, considered inand circumstances indicate, by their own nature, uncertainties that may affect the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt aboutsuccess of the RJ Proceedings and possibly cast doubts as to our ability to continue as a going concern within oneconcern. As at December 31, 2019 and after the implementation of the RJ Plan, total shareholders’ equity was R$17,797 million, loss for the year after our financial statements are issued. Our management’s assessmentthen ended was R$9,095 million, and working capital (consisting of our ability to continue as a going concern is discussed in note 2 to our audited consolidated financial statements.current assets less current liabilities) totaled R$6,157 million. As ofat December 31, 2018 we have fulfilledand after the obligations established inrecognition of the effects of the RJ Plan, withintotal shareholders’ equity was R$22,896 million, profit for the established time limits. As a result of the completion on January 25, 2019 of theyear then ended was R$24,616 million, and working capital increase that was mandated by the RJ Plan through the issuance of 3,225,806,451 Common Shares for an aggregate subscription price oftotaled R$4,000 million in our preemptive offering, our management believes that as10,624 million.

As of the date of this annual report, we have not been able to quantify any material impacts related toCOVID-19 and it is too soon to accurately determine the extent of its medium- and long-term impacts on the global and Brazilian economic scenarios. However, as it is not possible yet to predict the duration and effects of this crisis, there is a risk of material impacts on our operations and sales, particularly our FTTH network expansion. For more details see “—Principal Factors Affecting Our Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Potential Effects of theCOVID-19 Pandemic.”

Additionally, our debt instruments with BNDES contain financial covenants that require Oi to maintain five specified financial ratios, measured on a quarterly basis. Under these debt instruments, BNDES has sufficient resourcesthe right to continue to operate foraccelerate the 12 months followingdebt if, at the date the financial covenants are tested, we are not in compliance with any two of this annual report.

We intend to prepare our consolidated financial statements as ofthese ratios. At December 31, 2019, we were in accordancecompliance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)these financial covenants.

As a result of the depreciation of thereal subsequent to December 31, 2019, partially due to theCOVID-19 pandemic and the public health measures adopted to combat the pandemic in Brazil and internationally, and the related effects on our U.S. dollar-denominated indebtedness and interest expenses, we believed that it was probable that as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). of March 31, 2020, we would not be in compliance with more than one of these financial ratios. In anticipation of these ratio breaches, on March 30, 2020 we obtained a waiver from BNDES.

For our fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, we included financial statements prepared under IFRS as part of our annual report on Form20-F, applying IFRS 1, “First-time Adoption of International Reporting Standards,” considering that our previous primary GAAP was Brazilian GAAP and that January 1, 2009 was the date of transition to IFRS. Consequently, as we are not aan IFRS first-time adopter, we intend to include in our annual report on Form20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019,have included a reconciliation from U.S. GAAP to IFRS for the comparative balance sheet (i.e., as of December 31, 2018) and comparative income statement periods preceding the most recent fiscal year (i.e., for the year ended December 31, 2018) in our audited consolidated financial statements to present the changes in the basis of presentation. However, we are already including in our December 31, 2018 financial statements a reconciliation from U.S. GAAP to IFRS of our equity and income statement for the year ended December 31, 2018, as described in note 1 to our audited consolidated financial statements.

Accounting for RJ Proceedings

As a result of the RJ Proceedings, we have applied ASC 852 in preparing our consolidated financial statements. ASC 852 requires that financial statements separately disclose and distinguish transactions and events that are directly associated with our reorganization from transactions and events that are associated with the ongoing operations of our business. Accordingly, certain expenses, realized gains and losses, and provisions for losses that are realized or incurred in the RJ Proceedings have been recorded under the classification “Reorganization items, net” in our consolidated statements of operations. In addition, our prepetition obligations that may be impacted by the RJ Proceedings based on our assessment of these obligations following the guidance of ASC 852 have been classified on our consolidated statement of financial position as “Liabilities subject to compromise.” Prepetition liabilities subject to compromise are required to be reported as the amount allowed as a claim by the RJ Court, regardless of whether they may be settled for lesser amounts. Certain amounts initially recorded as liabilities subject to compromise were adjusted and reclassified to reflect new legal terms and conditions established by the RJ Court. As a result of the effectiveness of the RJ Plan on February 5, 2018, the contingencies included as “Liabilities subject to compromise” on our consolidated statement of financial position will be paid according to terms of the RJ Plan and were reclassified as current andnon-current “Provisions for contingencies” on our consolidated statement of financial position.

As a result of the completion on January 25, 2019 of the capital increase that was mandated by the RJ Plan, for purposes of the preparation of our financial statements under U.S. GAAP, we are deemed to have emerged from the RJ Proceedings. Upon emergence on January 25, 2019, we would be required to adopt fresh-start accounting, as required by ASC 852. The adoption of fresh start accounting would require our company to assign the reorganization value to our assets and liabilities, in conformity with the guidance of ASC 805 applicable to business combinations. Under this guidance, our assets and liabilities would be adjusted to fair market values, with any excess recorded as goodwill. However, as we intend to report our consolidated financial statements as of dates and for the periods ending after January 1, 2019 in accordance with IFRS as issued by the IASB, we will not adopt fresh start accounting as there are no requirements under IFRS to do so.

Business Segments and Presentation of Segment Financial Data

We use operating segment information for decision-making. We have identified only one operating segment that corresponds to the telecommunications business in Brazil.

The Telecommunications in Brazil segment includes our telecommunications business in Brazil,Brazil. In addition to our telecommunications business in Brazil, we conduct other businesses that individually or in aggregate do not meet any of the quantitative indicators that would require their disclosure as reportable business segments. These businesses are conducted primarily by Companhia Santomense de Telecomunicações, Listas Telefónicas de Moçambique, ELTA – Empresa de Listas Telefónicas de Angola,CST, Directel, and Timor Telecom, which provide fixed and mobile telecommunications services and publish telephone directories in Africa and Asia, and which have been consolidated in our financial statements since May 2014.

Within our Telecommunications in Brazil segment, our management assesses revenue generation based on customer segmentation into the following categories:

 

Residential Services, which is focused on the sale of fixed telephony services, including voice services, data communication services (broadband), andPay-TV;

Personal Mobility Services, which is focused on the sale of mobile telephony services to postpaid (subscription) and prepaid customers that include voice services and data communication services; and

 

B2B Services, which includes corporate solutions offered to our small,medium-sized, and large corporate customers, including voice services and corporate data solutions and wholesale interconnection and traffic transportation services to other telecommunications providers.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our critical accounting policies and estimates are described in note 2 to our audited consolidated financial statements. In preparing our audited consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP,IFRS, our management uses estimates and assumptions based on historical experience and other factors, including expected future events, which we consider reasonable and relevant. Critical accounting policies are those that are important to the portrayal of our consolidated financial position and results of operations and require management’s subjective and complex judgments, estimates and assumptions. The application of these critical accounting policies frequently requires judgments made by management regarding the effects of matters that are inherently uncertain with respect to the outcomes of transactions and the carrying value of our assets and liabilities. Our actual results of operations and financial position may differ from those set forth in our audited consolidated financial statements, if our actual experience differs from management’s assumptions and estimates. In order to provide an understanding of our critical accounting policies, including some of the variables and assumptions underlying the estimates, and the sensitivity of those assumptions and estimates to different parameters and conditions, we set forth below a discussion of our critical accounting policies relating to:

 

fair value of financial liabilities;revenue recognition and trade receivables;

 

revenue recognition andexpected losses on trade receivables;

 

depreciation of property, plant and equipment;

 

allowancesimpairment of long-lived assets;

leases;

fair value of financial liabilities;

provisions for doubtful accounts;contingencies;

 

fair value ofavailable-for-saleheld-for-sale investments;

 

deferred income taxes and social contribution;

impairment of long-lived assets; and

 

defined postretirement benefit plans;plans.

Revenue Recognition and Trade Receivables

contingencies; and

estimate of expectedOur revenues correspond primarily to the amount of the allowed claimspayments received or receivable from sales of services in the regular course of our activities and our subsidiaries’ activities.

Revenue is recognized to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.

Our revenue recognition considers the judgments that significantly affect the determined amount and the recognition timing of the revenue from a contract with a customer, taking into account the five-step recognition model: (i) identify the contract; (ii) identify the separate performance obligations in the contract; (iii) determine the transaction price; (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations; and (v) recognition of revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation.

Service revenue is recognized when services are provided. Local and long-distance calls are charged based on time measurement according to the legislation in effect. The services charged based on monthly fixed amounts are calculated and recorded on a straight-line basis. Prepaid services are recognized as unearned revenues and recognized in revenue as these services are used by customers.

Revenue from sales of handsets and accessories is recognized when these items are delivered and accepted by the customers. Discounts on services provided and sales of cell phones and accessories are taken into consideration in the recognition of the related revenue. Revenues involving transactions with multiple performance obligations are identified in relation to each one of their components, and the recognition criteria are applied on an individual basis. Variable consideration is estimated at contract inception and constrained to revenue recognition until it is highly probable that a significant revenue reversal will not occur.

Our revenue is a material component of our results of operations. Management’s determination of price, collectability and the rights to receive certain revenues for the use of our network are based on judgments regarding the nature of the fee charged for services rendered, the price for certain services delivered and the collectability of those revenues. Should changes in conditions cause management to conclude that these criteria are not met for certain transactions, the amount of accounts receivable could be adversely affected. In addition, for certain categories of revenue we rely upon revenue recognition measurement guidelines set by ANATEL.

We consider revenue recognition to be a critical accounting policy, because of the uncertainties caused by different factors such as the complex information technology required, high volume of transactions, risk of fraud and piracy, accounting regulations, management’s determination of collectability and uncertainties regarding our right to receive certain revenues (mainly revenues for use of our network). Significant changes in these factors could cause us to fail to recognize revenues or to recognize revenues that we may not be able to realize in the future, despite our internal controls and procedures. We have not identified any significant need to change our revenue recognition policy.

Expected Losses on Trade Receivables

Our expected losses on trade receivables are established in order to recognize probable losses on accounts receivable and take into account limitations we impose to restrict the provision of services to customers withpast-due accounts and actions we take to collect delinquent accounts. The expected losses on trade receivables estimate is recognized in an amount considered sufficient to cover possible losses on the realization of these receivables. The expected losses on trade receivables estimate is prepared based on historical default rates. During 2018, we reassessed the methodology used to evaluate the assumption of expected losses on trade receivables that is set up to recognize probable losses on accounts receivable taking into account the measures implemented to restrict the provision of services to and collect late payments from customers. For additional information regarding our expected losses on trade receivables, see note 9 to our audited consolidated financial statements.

We have entered into agreements with certain customers to collectpast-due accounts receivable, including agreements allowing customers to settle their delinquent accounts in installments. The amounts that we actually fail to collect in respect of these accounts may differ from the amount of the allowance established, and additional allowances may be required.

Depreciation of Property, Plant and Equipment

We depreciate property, plant and equipment using the straight-line method at rates we judge compatible with the useful lives of the underlying assets. The average depreciation rates of each of our classes of assets are presented in note 16 to our audited consolidated financial statements. The useful lives of assets in certain categories may vary based on whether they are used primarily to provide fixed-line or mobile services. We review the estimated useful lives of the assets taking into consideration technical obsolescence and a valuation by outside experts.

Given the complex nature of our property, plant and equipment, the estimates of useful lives require considerable judgment and are inherently uncertain, due to rapidly changing technology and industry practices, which could cause early obsolescence of our property, plant and equipment. If we materially change our assumptions of useful lives and if external market conditions require us to determine the possible obsolescence of our property, plant and equipment, our depreciation expense, obsolescencewrite-off and consequently net book value of our property, plant and equipment could be materially different.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Long-lived assets include assets that do not have indefinite lives, such as property, plant, and equipment, and purchased intangible assets subject to amortization. These assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If circumstances require a long-lived asset or asset group be tested for possible impairment, we first compare the value in use of that asset or asset group to its recoverable value. If the carrying amount of the long-lived asset or asset group exceeds the value in use of that asset or asset group, an impairment is recognized to the extent that the carrying amount exceeds its recoverable value. The calculation of value in use and recoverable value of assets or asset groups requires the use of judgments and assumptions that may be influenced by different external and internal factors, such as economic trends, industry trends and interest rates, changes in business strategies, and changes in the type of services and products sold our company to the market. The use of different assumptions may significantly change our financial statements.

During the year ended December 31, 2019, we performed an impairment test on ournon-current assets under IAS 36 and recognized an impairment provision of R$2,111 million primarily as a result of (1) the revision of our strategic plan, focused on improving operating and financial performance, using a sustainable business model that is designed to maximize the Company’s value in the context of our judicial reorganization; and (2) increased market competitiveness, mainly in the residential market, which accelerated the decline in the revenues from fixed-line services and DTH services.

During the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, we performed impairment tests on ournon-current assets under IAS 36. We recorded an impairment provision of R$292 million during the year ended December 31, 2018 consisting of a supplementary adjustment to the recognized allowance for impairment losses related to expected future profitability of assets with finite useful lives. We recorded a reversal of impairment provision of R$4,747 million during the year ended December 31, 2017 consisting of the partial reversal of impairment losses related to the expected future profitability of assets with finite useful lives due to the scenarios and financial indicators taken into consideration in the cash flows from the RJ Proceedings.Plan.

Leases

We recognize aright-of-use asset and a lease liability on our balance sheet with respect to leased assets. Theright-of-use asset is measured at cost, which consists of the initial amount of the lease liability measurement, any initial direct costs incurred by us, an estimate of any costs to disassemble and remove the asset at the end of the lease, and any lease payments made before the lease commencement date (net of any incentives received), calculated at present value, discounted using the incremental lending rate.

We depreciate theright-of-use assets on a straight-line basis from the commencement of the lease to the termination of the lease. We also assess impairment when there are indicators that an asset might be impaired.

Our assumptions regarding appropriate discount rates used in our calculation of the present value of our leases are subject to significant fluctuations due to different external and internal factors, including economic trends and the financial performance of our company. The use of different assumptions to measure the present value of our leases could have a material effect on the estimated present value of theright-of-use asset and of the lease liability in our balance sheet.

Fair Value of Financial Liabilities

We have adopted the fair value option under Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification 820 “Fair Value Measurement”, or ASC 820, with respect to the recording ofUnder IFRS 9, our financial liabilities. These financial liabilities have been valued at fair value according to the criteria of ASC 820borrowings and financing were substantially modified as of the timeBrazilian Confirmation Date and therefore derecognized and the modified borrowings and financing were recorded at which we reclassified each of our financial liabilities that were legally affected by the RJ Plan from liabilities subject to compromise to loans and financings or trade payables.fair value. We estimated the fair value of each of these financial liabilities based on an internal valuation made of these financial liabilities, which takes into consideration the cash flows under these financial instruments provided for in the RJ Plan, and assumptions regarding appropriate discount rates and foreign exchange rates consistent with the tenor and currency of each of these financial liabilities.

The fair value adjustment recognized on our balance sheet with respect to each financial liability atas of the time that we reclassified that financial liabilityBrazilian Confirmation Date is amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of that financial liability and on a monthly basis we record a financial expense in the amount of the amortization in our statement of operations and a corresponding reduction in the fair value adjustment on our balance sheet.

During the year ended December 31, 2018, we recorded gains on adjustments to fair value of our loansborrowings and financings of R$13,92913,928 million and gains on adjustments to present value of our trade payables (including trade payables toANATEL-AGU) of R$5,5771,167 million. We do not expect to record additional significant fair value adjustments in our statements of operations.

Our assumptions regarding appropriate discount rates and foreign exchange rates used in our calculation of the fair value of our financial liabilities are subject to significant fluctuations due to different external and internal factors, including economic trends and the financial performance of our company. The use of different assumptions to measure the fair value of our financial liabilities could have a material effect on the estimated fair value of these financial instrumentsliabilities and the amounts recorded as loansborrowings and financings and trade payables in our balance sheet, as well as the amounts recordedrecognized as reorganization items, netprofit or loss in our statement of operations.

Revenue RecognitionProvisions for Contingencies

Liabilities for loss contingencies arising from claims, assessment, litigation, fines and Trade Receivables

Our revenues correspond primarily topenalties are recorded when it is probable that the liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated, based on the opinion of management and itsin-house and outside legal counsel. The amounts are recognized based on the cost of the payments receivedexpected outcome of ongoing lawsuits.

We classify our risk of loss in legal proceedings as remote, possible or receivable from sales of servicesprobable. Provisions recorded in our audited consolidated financial statements in connection with these proceedings reflect reasonably estimated losses at the regular course ofrelevant date as determined by our activities andmanagement after consultation with our subsidiaries’ activities.

Service revenue is recognized when services are provided. Local and long distance calls are charged based on time measurement according to the legislation in effect. The services charged based on monthly fixed amounts are calculated and recorded on a straight-line basis. Prepaid services are recognized as unearned revenues and recognized in revenue as these services are used by customers.

Revenue from sales of handsets and accessories is recognized when these items are delivered and accepted by the customers. Discounts on services provided and sales of cell phones and accessories are taken into consideration in the recognition of the related revenue. Revenues involving transactions with multiple elements are identified in relation to each one of their components,general counsel and the recognition criteria are appliedoutside legal counsel. Depending on an individual basis. Revenue is not recognized when there is significant uncertainty as to its realization.

Our revenue is a material component of our results of operations. Management’s determination of price, collectability and the rights to receive certain revenues for the use of our network are based on judgments regarding the nature of the fee chargedcontingency, our management uses the statistical measurement or the individual measurement methodology to calculate provisions for services rendered, the price for certain services deliveredcontingencies. In any of these methodologies, we use a set of assumptions, information, an internal and the collectability of those revenues. Should changes in conditions causeexternal risk assessment, and statistical models that management to conclude that these criteria are not met for certain transactions, the amount of accounts receivable could be adversely affected. In addition, for certain categories of revenue we rely upon revenue recognition measurement guidelines set by ANATEL.

We consider revenue recognitionconsiders to be a critical accounting policy, becauseappropriate, including the successful implementation of the uncertainties caused by different factors such as the complex information technology required, high volume of transactions, fraud and piracy, accounting regulations, management’s determination of collectability and uncertainties regarding our right to receive certain revenues (mainly revenues for use of our network). Significant changes in these factors could cause us to fail to recognize revenues or to recognize revenues that we may not be able to realize in the future, despite our internal controls and procedures. We have not identified any significant need to change our revenue recognition policy.RJ Plan.

Depreciation of Property, Plant and Equipment

We depreciate property, plant and equipment using the straight-line method at rates we judge compatible with the useful lives of the underlying assets. The depreciation rates of our most significant assets are presentedAs discussed in note 1324 to our audited consolidated financial statements. The useful livesstatements, we record as a liability our estimate of assets in certain categories may varythe costs of resolution of such claims, when we consider our losses probable. We continually evaluate the provisions based on whether they are used primarily to provide fixed-line or mobile services. We review the estimated useful lives of the assets taking into consideration technical obsolescencechanges in relevant facts, circumstances and a valuation by outside experts.

Given the complex nature of our property, plant and equipment,events, such as judicial decisions, that may impact the estimates, of useful lives require considerable judgment and are inherently uncertain, due to rapidly changing technology and industry practices, which could cause early obsolescencehave a material impact on our results of our property, plantoperations and equipment. If we materially changeshareholders’ equity. While management believes that the current provision is adequate, it is possible that our assumptions of useful lives and if external market conditions require usused to determine the possible obsolescence of our property, plant and equipment, our depreciation expense, obsolescencewrite-off and consequently net book value of our property, plant and equipment could be materially different.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Our allowance for doubtful accounts is established in order to recognize probable losses on accounts receivable and takes into account limitations we impose to restrictestimate the provision and, therefore, our estimates of services to customers withpast-due accounts and actions we take to collect delinquent accounts. The allowance for doubtful accounts estimate is recognizedloss in an amount considered sufficient to cover possible losses onrespect of any given contingency will change in the realization of these receivables. The allowance for doubtful accounts estimate is preparedfuture based on historic default rates. During 2018, we reassessedchanges in the methodology used to evaluate the assumption of allowancerelevant situation. This may therefore result in changes in future provisioning for doubtful accounts that is set up to recognize probable losses on accounts receivable taking into account the measures implemented to restrict the provision of services to and collect late payments from customers.legal claims. For additionalmore information regarding material pending claims against our allowance for doubtful accounts,company, see “Item 8. Financial Information—Legal Proceedings” and note 824 to our audited consolidated financial statements.

We have entered into agreements with certain customers to collectpast-due accounts receivable, including agreements allowing customers to settle their delinquent accounts in installments. The amounts that we actually fail to collect in respect of these accounts may differ from the amount of the allowance established, and additional allowance may be required.

Fair Value ofAvailable-for-SaleHeld-for-Sale Investments

Our investments in Unitel, including our investment in its declared and unpaid dividends, and CVT are classified asavailable-for-saleheld-for-sale investments and have been valued at fair value according toassets represent the operating assets used as basisindirect interest held by PT Ventures in the valuation of these investments atdividends receivable and the time of our May 2014 capital increase. Unrealized holding gains and losses, net of the related tax effect, onavailable-for-sale investments are excluded from earnings and are reported as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income until realized.

The fair value of theour financial investment in Unitel, both classified asavailable-for-saleheld-for-sale. investments is estimated based on the internal valuation made, including cash flows forecasts for a five-year period, the choice of a growth rate to extrapolate the cash flows projections, and definition of appropriate discount rates and foreign exchange rates consistent with the reality of each country where the businesses are located. In addition to the financial and business assumptions referred to above, we also take into consideration the fair value measurement of cash investments, qualitative assumptions, including the impacts of developments in the lawsuits filed against third parties, and the opinion of the legal counsel on the outcome of these lawsuits. With regard to the impairment test of dividends, we use financial assumptions on the discount rate in time and the foreign exchange rate, and use qualitative assumptions based on the opinion of the legal counsel on the outcome of the lawsuits filed against Unitel for the nonpayment of dividends and interest. We monitor and periodically update the key assumptions and critical estimates used to calculate fair value.

During 2017 and 2016, we recorded losses onavailable-for-sale financialThe assets of R$267 million and R$1,090 million, respectively, resulting from the revision of the recoverable amount of dividends receivable from Unitel,investment held in PT Ventures are measured substantially at the fair value of the cash investment for sale. We sold 100% of our interest in Unitel and exchange rate losses related to the depreciation of the Angolan Kwanza against the U.S. dollar and thereal. During 2018, we recorded a gainPT Ventures onavailable-for-sale financial assets of R$293 million, primarily as a result of a R$829 million exchange rate gain due to the 17.1% depreciation of thereal against the U.S. dollar during 2018 and R$142 million recorded with respect to our portion of dividends approved by Unitel related to Unitel’s 2017 fiscal year, the effects of which were partially offset by a R$678 million loss recorded based on our revision of the fair value of the cash investment in Unitel. January 24, 2020.

Our estimates of future cash flows from ouravailable-for-sale investments may not necessarily be indicative of the amounts that could be obtained in the current market. The use of different assumptions to measure the fair value ofavailable-for-sale investments could have a material effect on the amounts obtained and not necessarily be indicative of the cash amounts that we would receive on the disposal of anavailable-for-sale investment.

Deferred Income Taxes and Social Contribution

Income taxes in Brazil are calculated and paid on a legal entity basis, and there are no consolidated tax returns. Accordingly, we only recognize deferred tax assets, related to tax loss carryforwards and temporary differences, if it is likely that they will be realized on a legal entity basis.

We recognize and settle taxes on income based on the results of operations determined in accordance with the Brazilian Corporate Law, taking into consideration the provisions of Brazilian tax law, which are materially different from the amounts calculated for U.S. GAAPIFRS purposes. Under U.S. GAAP,IFRS, we recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for temporary differences between the carrying amounts and the taxable bases of the assets and liabilities, and tax loss carryforwards are recorded in assets or liabilities, as applicable. We recognize the effect of income tax positions only if those positions are more likely than not of being sustained. Recognized income tax positions are measured at the largest amount that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized. Changes in recognition or measurement are reflected in the period in which the change in judgment occurs.

We regularly test deferred tax assets for impairment and recognize a provision for impairment losses when it is probable that these assets may not be realized, based on the history of taxable income, the projection of future taxable income, and the time estimated for the reversal of existing temporary differences. These projections require the use of estimates and assumptions. In order to project future taxable income, we need to estimate future taxable revenues and deductible expenses, which are subject to a variety of external and internal factors, such as economic trends, industry trends and interest rates, changes in business strategies, and changes in the type of services and products sold by our company. The use of different estimates and assumptions could result in the recognition of a provision for impairment losses for the entire or a significant portion of the deferred tax assets.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Long-lived assets include assets that do not have indefinite lives, such as property, plant, and equipment, and purchased intangible assets subject to amortization. These assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If circumstances require a long-lived asset or asset group be tested for possible impairment, we first compare the undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by that asset or asset group to its carrying amount. If the carrying amount of the long-lived asset or asset group is not recoverable on an undiscounted cash flow basis, an impairment is recognized to the extent that the carrying amount exceeds its fair value. Fair value is determined through various valuation techniques including discounted cash flow models, quoted market values and third-party independent appraisals, as deemed necessary.

We have not recorded any impairment of our long-lived assets during the three years ended December 31, 2018.

Defined Postretirement Benefit Plans

We sponsor certain defined postretirement benefit plans for our employees. We record liabilities for defined postretirement benefits plan based on actuarial valuations which are calculated based on assumptions and estimates regarding discount rates, investment returns, inflation rates for future periods, mortality indices and projected employment levels relating to postretirement benefit liabilities. The accuracy of these assumptions and estimates will determine whether we have created sufficient reserves for the costs of accumulated defined postretirement benefits plans, and the amount we are required to disburse each year to fund postretirement benefits plans. These assumptions and estimates are subject to significant fluctuations due to different external and internal factors, such as economic trends, social indicators, our capacity to create new jobs and our ability to retain our employees. All of these assumptions are reviewed at the end of each reporting period. If these assumptions and estimates are not accurate, we may be required to revise our reserves for defined postretirement benefits, which could materially impact our results of operations.

Contingencies

Liabilities for loss contingencies arising from claims, assessment, litigation, fines and penalties are recorded when it is probable that the liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated, based on the opinion of management and itsin-house and outside legal counsel. The amounts are recognized based on the cost of the expected outcome of ongoing lawsuits.

We classify our risk of loss in legal proceedings as remote, possible or probable. Provisions recorded in our consolidated financial statements in connection with these proceedings reflect reasonably estimated losses at the relevant date as determined by our management after consultation with our general counsel and the outside legal counsel. As discussed in note 19 to our audited consolidated financial statements, we record as a liability our estimate of the costs of resolution of such claims, when we consider our losses probable. We continually evaluate the provisions based on changes in relevant facts, circumstances and events, such as judicial decisions, that may impact the estimates, which could have a material impact on our results of operations and shareholders’ equity. While management believes that the current provision is adequate, it is possible that our assumptions used to estimate the provision and, therefore, our estimates of loss in respect of any given contingency will change in the future based on changes in the relevant situation. This may therefore result in changes in future provisioning for legal claims. For more information regarding material pending claims against our company, see “Item 8. Financial Information—Legal Proceedings” and note 19 to our audited consolidated financial statements.

Estimate of Expected Amount of the Allowed Claims in the RJ Proceedings

Our estimate of the expected amount of the allowed claims in the RJ Proceedings is a significant estimate. Future actions and decisions by the RJ Court may differ significantly from our own estimate, potentially having material future effects on our financial statements. Furthermore, these liabilities are reported as the amounts expected to be allowed by the RJ Court, even if they may be settled for lesser amounts. There may be significant differences between the settled amount and the expected amount of the allowed claim.

Principal Factors Affecting Our Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Effects of the RJ Proceedings and Our Financial Restructuring

In June 2016, as a result of several factors affecting our liquidity, we anticipated that we would no longer be able to comply with our payment obligations under our loansborrowings and financing transactions and we concluded that filing of a request for judicial reorganization in Brazil would be the most appropriate course of action (1) to preserve the continuity of our offering of quality services to our customers, within the rules and commitments undertaken with ANATEL, (2) to preserve the value of our company, (3) to maintain the continuity of our operations and corporate activities in an organized manner that protects the interests of our company, customers, shareholders and other stakeholders, and (4) to protect our cash and cash equivalents.

Our liquidity crisis resulted principally from:

 

  

the deterioration of the Brazilian economy, which suffered low or negative GDP growth for several years and increased levels of unemployment, with negative effects on (1) our ability to retract and retain customers, and corresponding negative effects on our net operating revenue, and (2) due to increases in Brazilian interest rates and the depreciationvalue of thereal, increases inand corresponding negative effects on our financing expenses;

 

the increasingly marginal (or in some instances, negative) returns that we achieved through network expansion designed to meet the universalization requirements imposed on our company as a fixed line concessionaire under the PGMU, which require us to make large capital expenditures in certain areas of Brazil that are remote, have low demographic density and have alow-income population, without the corresponding ability to recoup these capital expenditures through the rates that we charge customers in these areas or elsewhere;

 

the change in consumption patterns of Brazilian consumers of telecommunication services as a result of the increasing attractiveness of mobile telecommunications, particularly following the global introduction of the “smart phone,“smartphone,” which has led to continuous sequential declines in the number of subscribers to our fixed-line services, with corresponding negative effects on our net operating revenue;

 

the requirement under Brazilian law that we make judicial deposits in connection with our defense of labor, tax, and civil lawsuits and regulatory claims brought against our company, which resulted in a significant amount of our liquid assets being diverted into judicial deposits, with the result that these assets were not available for us to use for our capital expenditure and debt service requirements;

 

the imposition of large administrative fines and penalties, including interest on unpaid charges and late fees, by ANATEL, which resulted in a significant amount of our liquid assets being diverted to pay these charges or into judicial deposits as we defend against these regulatory claims, with the result that these assets were not available for us to use for our capital expenditure and debt service requirements; and

 

the increases in our debt service requirements as we relied on funds obtained from financing transactions in the Brazilian and international markets to expand our data communications network and to implement projects to meet ANATEL’s regulatory requirements market.

On June 20, 2016, Oi, together with the other RJ debtors, filed a joint voluntary petition for judicial reorganization pursuant to the Brazilian Bankruptcy Law with the RJ Court, pursuant an urgent measure approved by our board of directors. For more information regarding the RJ Proceedings, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—Our Recent History and Development—Our Judicial Reorganization Proceedings.”

Effects of RJ Proceedings on Our Statement of Operations and Balance Sheet

Our net operating revenue was negatively affected by the RJ Proceedings primarily as a result of the impact of these proceedings on our ability to attract new corporate customers for our B2B business as these potential customers have been wary of entering into long-term service contracts with us during the pendency of these proceedings. We do not believe that the RJ Proceedings had a direct impact on our net revenue from other services. However, the factors affecting our net operating revenue that led to our liquidity crisis persist.

As a result of the RJ Proceedings, we have realized gains and losses and made provisions for losses that are realized or incurred in the RJ Proceedings which have been recorded in as reorganization items, net in our consolidated statements of operations. Reorganization items, net was an expensefinancial income of R$2,372 during 2017 and R$9,0064,873 million during 2016.

Asthe year ended December 31, 2017 from the adjustment to present value of the provision for contingencies related to administrative proceedings and lawsuits involving ANATEL as a result of the commencementrevision of the RJ Proceedings, our loans and financings were classified as liabilities subject to compromise and ascalculations of this provision, taking into account the datebest estimate of future cash outflows based on the commencement ofpayment methods prescribed in the RJ Proceedings, we ceased recording interest expenses and foreign exchange gains and losses on these loans and financings as part of our financial expenses, net. In addition, in connection with our deteriorating financial condition and the commencement of the RJ Proceedings, we reversed our derivative financial instruments during the second and third quarters of 2016.Plan.

We also reclassified our trade payables, provisions for civil contingencies, provisions for labor contingencies and provision for pension plans as of the date of the commencement of the RJ Proceedings as liabilities subject to compromise.

Effects of Confirmation of the RJ Plan on Our Statement of Operations and Balance Sheet

On December 19 and 20, 2017, thea GCM was held to consider approval of the most recently filed judicial reorganization plan. TheThis GCM concluded on December 20, 2017 following the approval of the RJ Plan reflecting amendments to the judicial reorganization plan presented at thethis GCM as negotiated during the course of thethis GCM.

On January 8, 2018, the RJ Court entered the Brazilian Confirmation Order, ratifying and confirming the RJ Plan, according to its terms, but modifying certain provisions of the RJ Plan. The Brazilian Confirmation Order was published in the Official Gazette of the State of Rio de Janeiro on February 5, 2018, the Brazilian Confirmation Date.

The Brazilian Confirmation Order, according to its terms, is binding on all parties, although still subject to appeals with no suspensive effect attributed to it. For more information regarding the recoveries which the creditors were entitled to receive under the RJ Plan, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—Our Recent History and Development—Our Judicial Reorganization Proceedings—Implementation of the Financial Settlement of the Judicial Reorganization Plan.”

As a result of the approval and confirmation of the RJ Plan:

 

we have begun to attract new corporate customers for our B2B business as the concerns of these potential customers regarding the long-term sustainability of our business have receded;

 

we recorded gain on reorganization items, netan adjustment to present value of R$31,58113,290 million during 2018;

all ofrelated to our obligations recorded as liabilities subject to compromiseprepetition borrowings and financing as of December 31, 2017 have been reclassified to other line items on our balance sheet and statement of operations to reflect the recoveries of the creditors with respect to those obligations, our payment of R$161 million to settle some of our debt instruments and trade payables as part of the Small Creditors Program (a program under which creditors could engage in mediation of their claims with us under which we would settle claims of R$50,000 or less without extinguishing those claims), and the settlement of some of our other liabilities through mediation.Brazilian Confirmation Date;

 

we recorded a gain on the restructuring of third-party borrowings of R$11,055 million as of the Brazilian Confirmation Date as a result of the terms of the RJ Plan that provided for the reduction of the amounts owed to holders of claims under the Defaulted Bonds; and

we recorded a reversal of debt issuance cost and accrued interest expenses and foreign exchange gains and losses on our restructured loansprepetition borrowings and financing as part of our financial expenses, net in the aggregate amount of R$4,0455,479 million during 2018.as of the Brazilian Confirmation Date.

For more information regarding our reorganization items, net, see note 28 to our audited consolidated financial statements; for more information regarding our liabilities subject to compromise, see note 29 to our audited consolidated financial statements.

Effects of Investments in Africatel

At the time of our acquisition of PT Portugal, PT Portugal held indirectly 75% of the outstanding share capital of Africatel which held 25% of the outstanding share capital of Unitel. We recognized this investment as anaavailable-for-saleheld-for-sale financial asset recognized at fair value. The fair value of the investment in Unitel of R$4,089 million was determined based on a valuation report of Pharol’s operating assets prepared by Banco Santander in connection with our acquisition of PT Portugal.

On September 16, 2014, our board of directors authorized our management to take the necessary measures to market our shares in Africatel. As a result, as of December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016,2017, we have recorded the assets and liabilities of Africatel, including its investment in Unitel and the accounts receivable relating to declared and unpaid dividends of Unitel, asheld-for sale, although we do not record Africatel as discontinued operations in our income statement of operations due to the immateriality of the effects of Africatel on our results of operations. Due to the many risks involved in the ownership of these interests, particularly our interest in Unitel, we cannot predict when the sale of these assets may be completed.

During the year ended December 31, 2019, we recorded a loss onheld-for-sale financial assets of R$238 million, primarily as a result of R$404 million loss recorded as a result of our revision of the fair value of the cash investment and dividends receivable from Unitel, the effects of which were primarily offset by a R$165 million exchange rate gain due to the 4.0% depreciation of the realagainst the U.S. dollar during the year ended December 31, 2019. During the year ended December 31, 2018, we recorded a gain onavailable-for-sale financial assets of R$293 million, primarily as a result of a R$829 million exchange rate gain due to the 17.1% depreciation of thereal against the U.S. dollar during 2018 and R$142 million recorded with respect to our portion of dividends approved by Unitel related to Unitel’s 2017 fiscal year, the effects of which were partially offset by a R$678 million loss recorded based on our revision of the fair value of the cash investment in Unitel. During the year ended December 31, 2017, and 2016, we recorded losses onavailable-for-saleheld-for-sale financial assets of R$267 million and R$1,090 million, respectively, resulting from the revision of the recoverable amount of dividends receivable from Unitel, the fair value of the cash investment in Unitel and exchange rate losses related to the depreciation of the Angolan Kwanza against the U.S. dollar and thereal.

On January 24, 2020, Africatel sold and transferred 100% of the share capital of PT Ventures to Sonangol for an aggregate purchase price of US$1 billion, of which US$61 million was paid to Africatel prior to the transfer of the shares, and Sonangol paid US$699 million in cash on the closing date. The remaining US$240 million of the purchase price is to be paid to Africatel by Sonangol by July 31, 2020, with a guaranteed minimum monthly payment of US$40 million beginning in February 2020 and we have received the minimum monthly payments due in February and March 2020. Payment of the remaining purchase price is fully guaranteed by a letter of credit. Pursuant to the Pharol Settlement Agreement, we deposited 34 million euros of the proceeds of this sale in an escrow account to cover losses relating to certain tax proceedings against Pharol.

The principal assets of PT Ventures included (1) a 25% stake in Unitel, (2) a 40% stake in Multitel Serviços de Telecomunicações Lda., (3) rights to dividends previously declared by Unitel, but not received by PT Ventures, and (4) all rights arising from a final award in the amount of approximately US$659 million in an arbitration proceeding initiated by PT Ventures against the other Unitel shareholders.

Rate of Growth of Brazil’s Gross Domestic Product and Demand for Telecommunications Services

As a Brazilian company with substantially all of our operations in Brazil, we are affected by economic conditions in Brazil. Brazilian GDP grew by an estimated 1.1% during the year ended December 31, 2019, and by 1.1% during 2018 and by 1.0% during 2017, following a decline of 3.5% in 2016.2017. The substantial and prolonged deterioration ofslow economic conditions in Brazilrecovery since the second quarter of 2014, together with continued elevated unemployment levels, have had a material adverse effect onadversely impacted the number of subscribers to our services and the volume of usage of our services by our subscribers and, as a result, our net operating revenue. subscribers.During the three-year period ended December 31, 2018,2019, the number of mobile subscribers in Brazil has declined at an average rate of 3.8%2.4% per year, while the number of fixed lines in service in Brazil during the three-year period ended December 31, 20182019 has declined at an average rate of 4.2%7.0% per year.

Demand for Our Residential Services

The number of our residential fixed lines in service declined by 21.3%29.6% to 8.37.0 million as of December 31, 20182019 from 10.59.9 million as of December 31, 2015.2016. Demand for our Residential Services was negatively affected by a decision of the Brazilian Supreme Court that we must pay ICMS tax on customer subscriptions that do not include allowances and our subsequent inclusion of this tax in customers’ bills in the first half of 2017. We have focused on offering more and higher-value addedhigher value-added services to new and existing customers by combining upselling and cross sellingcross-selling initiatives, thereby increasing the ARPU of our Residential Services business. We believe that through our sales of bundles consisting of more than one service, we improve customer profitability and enhance loyalty, while also increasing ARPU and minimizing churn rates.

We have sought to combat the general trend in the Brazilian telecommunications industry of substitution of mobile services in place of local fixed-line services by offering a variety of bundled plans that include mobile services, broadband services andOi TV subscriptions to our fixed-line customers. We believe that through our sales of bundles consisting of more than one service, we improve customer profitability and enhance loyalty, while also increasing ARPU and minimizing churn rates. In addition, we have been focusing on structural network investments, including the introduction of VDSL technology, in order to offer service plans that include higher broadband speeds.

Demand for our residential services was negatively affected by a decision of the Brazilian Supreme Court that we must pay ICMS tax on customer subscriptions that do not include allowances and our subsequent inclusion of this tax in customers’ bills in the first half of 2017.

Demand for Our Personal Mobility Services

Our customer base for mobility services (including customers in our Personal Mobility Services and B2B Services) has declined by 21.6%12.7% to 37.736.8 million as of December 31, 20182019 from 48.142.2 million as of December 31, 2015.2016. We believe that the primary reason for the decline in our Personal Mobility Services customer base is the reduction in the total number of mobile accesses in Brazil, reflecting the trend to consolidate mobile use into a single SIM card, following the launch ofall-net plans in response to the successive reductions of the MTR tariffs, and the structural market migration from voice to data in response to the offering of more robust data packages. Additionally, we have implemented an intensive policy of disconnecting inactive users to reduce regulatory fees that we must make for each active account.account, which has also contributed to the decline in our Personal Mobility Services customer base. Finally, we believe that the number of our prepaid accounts has been significantly reduceddeclined over this period as a result of the increase in Brazil’s unemployment rate as our net additions of prepaid subscribers isare closely correlated to movements in the unemployment rate.

The market for mobile services is extremely competitive in each of the regions that we serve. As a result, (1) we incur selling expenses in connection with marketing and sales efforts designed to retain existing mobile customers and attract new mobile customers, and (2) from time to time the discounts that we offer in connection with our promotional activities lead to charges against our gross operating revenue from mobile services. Competitive pressures have required us to introduce service plans under which we offer unlimited voice calls tied to service offerings priced in relation to the amount of data usage offered.

Demand for Our B2B Services

The number of RGUs of our B2B Services has declined by 6.9% to 6.7remained stable at 6.6 million as of December 31, 2018 from 7.2 million as of2019 and December 31, 2015.2016. We believe that the primary reasons for the decline in our B2B Services customer base has been negatively impacted by (1) the declining macroeconomic conditions in Brazil, which has caused many of our SME customers to downsize or cease operations, and (2) contractions in the fiscal strength of many of our governmental customers, which has caused them to reduce the scope of their telecommunications expenditures, and (3) market perceptionsthe effects of which have been offset by the increased use of our company during our RJ proceedings which has made it difficult for us to enter into new agreements with corporate customers, although following the approvalSIM cards, networks and confirmation of the RJ Plan, we have begun to attract new corporate customers for our B2B business as the concerns of these potential customers regarding the long-term sustainability of our business have receded.solutions by payment industry terminals.

Our corporate customers, while better able to survive the current economic instability, often respond by reducing their economic activity and their spending for telecommunications products and services. In addition, provided that our B2B Services customers also purchase the core fixed-line and mobile services offered to our Residential and Personal Mobility Services customers, demand for our B2B Services is subject to some of the same conditions that affect our Residential and Personal Mobility Services, including reductions in interconnection tariffs, which have led to more robust mobile package offerings and driven the traffic migration trend offixed-to-mobile substitution.

Effects of Expansion of FTTH Capacity

We are engaged in a long-term capital expenditure project to upgrade portions of our fixed-line access networks with optical FTTH networks based on GPON technology to support our FTTH triple-play services. The implementation of this technology permits us to provide broadband with speeds up to 200 Mbps to residential customers and up to 1 Gbps to commercial customers. This project is one of the principal elements of our strategic plan and is the element designed to turnaround our fixed line business.

Our FTTH network has grown to reach more than 4.6 million homes passed in 82 municipalities as of December 31, 2019 compared to 1.2 million homes passed in 28 municipalities as of December 31, 2018. Subscriptions to our FTTH services have grown to approximately 675,000 homes connected as of December 31, 2019 from approximately 92,000 homes connected as of December 31, 2018. We expect to reach more than eight million homes passed and an additional one million homes connected by the end of 2020 and our goal is to reach 16 million homes passed by the end of 2021.

We expect our FTTH services will generate long-term increases in our residential services revenue as we acquire new broadband customers, increasing the size of our client base, and transition current customers from our copper last-mile network to our FTTH network, allowing us to provide higher-value services, including faster data transmission speeds to our residential broadband customers, increasing the ARPU of these subscribers. We expect that providing these higher-value services to our customers will contribute to our efforts to reduce the pace of decline in our fixed-lines in service and reverse this trend in the long-term.

The marketing and promotion campaigns related to our expanded FTTH services contributed to an increase in our marketing and advertising expenses during 2019 and are expected to remain at elevated levels during theroll-out of this service offering.

The expansion of our FTTH network has been and will continue to be capital intensive. During 2019, we invested R$3.1 billion in the network equipment and infrastructure necessary to expand our FTTH network, which has increased in our depreciation expenses. We expect that our capital expenditures related to the expansion of our FTTH network will continue at elevated levels throughout 2020 and 2021. We financed the expansion of our FTTH network in 2019 through cash on hand, primarily with the proceeds of our January 2019 capital increase. We expect to continue to finance the expansion of our FTTH network through cash on hand, including with the proceeds of our sale of PT Ventures and the proceeds of Oi Mobile’s debentures, proceeds ofnon-core asset sales and cash flows from operations. Additionally, we expect to accelerate the potential of our FTTH expansion using two franchise models, one in which we partner with an existing ISP with an established brand under which we provide the backbone capacity, the data connectivity, access to our locations andco-hosting of facilities and the ISP provides the last mile connection, and the second in which our support of our partners will be much more important and more akin to a traditional franchise, with many more components of the operations provided by our company, including customer care and the standardization of the portfolio offerings. If we are unable to fund these capital expenditures through our operating cash flows and proceeds ofnon-core asset sales, we may incur additional indebtedness or vendor financing obligations, which would increase our outstanding indebtedness and financial expenses. If these resources are insufficient to fund the continued expansion of our FTTH network, we may be required to scale back this project.

Potential Effects of theCOVID-19 Pandemic

Since December 2019,COVID-19 has spread throughout the world. On January 31, 2020, the World Health Organization announced thatCOVID-19 was a global health emergency and on March 3, 2020, the World Health Organization categorizedCOVID-19 as a pandemic.. TheCOVID-19 pandemic has resulted in numerous deaths and the imposition of local, municipal and national governmental“shelter-in-place” and other quarantine measures, border closures and other travel restrictions, causing unprecedented economic disruption in much of the world, including in Brazil.

The local, national and international response to the virus is quickly developing, fluid and uncertain. During March and April of 2020, state, local and municipal authorities within Brazil promoted and enforced social isolation and quarantine measures and have enacted regulations limiting the operations of“non-essential” businesses. Inmid-March 2020, Rio de Janeiro and other Brazilian states declared states of emergency. In accordance with the recommendations of the authorities, we transitioned a substantial majority of our employees to work from home.

Although theCOVID-19 pandemic has no effect on our historical results of operations, there are many potential effects of this pandemic on our short- and medium- term business operations and, consequently, our results of operations. In March 2020, we established a crisis response team to focus on ensuring the full business continuity of our operations, the health and safety of our employees, and the establishment of a formal process to monitor, analyze and respond to the potential impacts of the pandemic. As of the date of this annual report, we have detected few cases ofCOVID-19 in our employees and our human resources department monitors suspected or confirmed cases. As one a measure designed to protect our employees, we have instituted a “work-from-home” policy for all of our employees for whom the demands of their work permit this arrangement, constituting approximately 84% of our work force, and have been able to do so without any interruption of their activities. For our remaining employees, for example, our field service technicians and operators in our call centers, we have complied with all health care recommendations of the World Health Organization and the Brazilian Ministry of Health.

The Brazilian government has determined that the telecom sector is an essential service, which allows us to continue our field maintenance activities without violating restrictions on movement that have generally been imposed to combat the pandemic.

Although there has not been sufficient history with our operations under the pandemic and the related public health measures to provide significant analysis of the potential financial impact of the pandemic or the governmental and popular response to the pandemic, we note that demand for telecommunications services, including services provided by our company, during the pandemic has grown significantly. In order to service this demand and to ensure continuity of our services, we moved quickly to activate new circuits in our backbone infrastructure and have not experienced any significant decline in the operation and reliability of our networks.

Since the outbreak of the pandemic, we have closed our retail stores and many of our distribution channels for our mobile service have been unable to operate, although some of our physicalpoints-of-sale, such as grocery stores, pharmacies and convenience stores, have continued to operate. As a result, we believe that new activations by mobile customers will be substantially reduced for the duration of these closures. However, as these store closures affect all operators in the mobile business equally, we expect that there will be substantially reduced levels of churn during this period. In addition, we expect that revenue for SIM card recharges will be adversely effected for the duration of these closures as the number ofpoints-of-sale that offer these services has been substantially reduced.

Since the outbreak of the pandemic, we have curtailed significantly ourdoor-to-door sales channel for residential services, including broadband, but have been able to maintain our telemarketing and teleagent sales channels. We have experienced a significant surge in demand for our broadband services, including services delivered through our expanding FTTH network, both from residential and B2B customers as they establish remote work operations. Because our sales channels for these services depend less on physical presence in sales locations than our mobile services, we do not expect the reduction in new activations or upgrades in services to be affected to the same degree as in our mobile services.

We expect that the public health measures adopted in Brazil will have significant impacts on the income and purchasing power of many of our subscribers, particularlylow-income subscribers and SMEs, some of whom may cease operations, although we have not yet been able to gather data to analyze the extent of these impacts. In addition, we have begun to experience some delays in payment for our corporate and governmental customers. As a result, we expect an increase in late-payments, customer defaults and expected losses on trade receivables. We have instituted some measures to assist our customers during the pandemic, for example, providing deferrals of payment deadlines by up to 10 days upon request of our customers and entering into payment plans with some of our customers under which we will forbear the collection of interest and late charges. These measures are likely to have an adverse effect on revenue and operating cash flow during the period over which they are effective, although we do not have sufficient experience with the effects of these measures to reliably estimate the quantitative effects of these measures.

We continue to monitor the effects ofCOVID-19 and the public health measures adopted in Brazil on our results of operations and cash flows to assess whether any of our assets have been impaired. As of the date of this annual report, we have do not have sufficient history with our operations under the pandemic and the related public health measures to assess whether any impairment of our assets will be required.

We do not expect significant negative effects on our ongoing maintenance activities and FTTH expansion project as a result of the pandemic and the public health measures introduced to combat the pandemic. We have experienced some negative effects relating to the deployment of field teams, primarily related to the difficulty of obtaining lodging and meals and, in some instances, the difficulty in arranging transportation between cities, due to the public health restrictions. However, as a result of the determination that the telecom sector is an essential service, the general public health restrictions applicable to the population have not generally applied to our staff of field technicians.

We continue to have regular communications with our equipment vendors to assess the impacts of the pandemic on their production and inventories to ensure that deliveries of equipment will continue to be made on a timely basis. As of the date of this annual report, we have not suffered any negative impacts in our supply chain for equipment and have not been advised that any significant disruptions are expected.

Effects of Our Absorption of Network Maintenance Service Operations and Adoption of New Customer Care Model

We have introduced programs beginning in 2015 to control costs related to network maintenance services and third-party services by (1) absorbing operation of several network maintenance service operations and providing these services ourselves, and (2) implementing a new customer care quality model through which we have improved our method of allocation of call center traffic to promote a greater level of customer service and digitized some of our customer interactions with respect to processing order for new services, troubleshooting service issues and dispatching maintenance personnel.

Through our subsidiary Serede Serviços de Rede S.A., or Serede we absorbed operations of our network maintenance service operations of our contractor in Rio de Janeiro in October 2015, our network maintenance service operations of our contractor in the South region of Brazil in May 2016 and our network maintenance service operations of our contractor in the North and Northeast regions of Brazil in June 2016. As a result, 75% of the members of our technical field staff are our employees and are directly managed by our company compared to 20% prior to the absorption of these operations. We have revised the focus of our network maintenance service operations to concentrate on preventive network maintenance the reduce the number of repairs, in turn reducing the volume of network interventions and increasing field force productivity, thus freeing capacity to increase our focus on preventive maintenance. This virtuous cycle improves field operations efficiency and reduces costs in terms of both the number of technicians and the volume of materials applied.

As a result of internalizing these operations, our network maintenance services expense has declined to R$1,014 million during the year ended December 31, 2019 from R$1,104 million during 2018 fromand R$1,252 million during 2017 and R$1,540 million during 2016, the effects of which have been partially offset by increased personnel expenses relating to these services.2017. In addition to reducing costs, we believe that this initiative has been principally responsible for (1) a reduction of the number of repairs by 19.4% during the year ended December 31, 2019, 17.2% during 2018 and 12.5% during 2017, and 6.9% during 2016, and (2) an increase in productivity of our field staff (as measured by the number of field activities carried out divided by the total number of technicians involved) by 1.2% during the year ended December 31, 2019, 6.9% during 2018 and 16.5% during 2017 and 6.3% during 2016.2017. Finally, we believe that this initiative has been principally responsible for (1) the reduction in the average time for installation of new service by 6.8% during the year ended December 31, 2019, 18.9% during 2018,2017 and 30.4% during 2017, and 30.0% during 2016, (2) the reduction in the average waiting time for resolution of a customer service issue by 7.4% during the year ended December 31, 2019, 3.2% during 2018 and 25.8% during 2017, and 20.1% during 2016, and (3) a reduction of complaints to ANATEL by 8.6% during the year ended December 31, 2019, 19.6% during 2018 and 23.0% during 2017 and 10.0% during 2016.2017.

During 2016, we implemented a new customer care quality model in which we allocated call traffic among our call center service providers based on service quality. In addition, in 2018, we began to promote electronic channels that allow self-service, increasing digital interactions and consequently reducing calls requiring interactions with call center personnel. These initiatives have stimulated better quality in the provision of services, resulting in a 17.3% and 22.8%6.5% decline in the volume of repeated calls during the year ended December 31, 2019, and 17.3% and 22.8% declines in the volume of repeated calls during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and a 22.5% and 8.9%13.3% decline in call center costs during the year ended December 31, 2019, and 22.5% and 8.9% declines in call center costs during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Effects of Adjustments to Our Interconnection Rates

Telecommunications services rates are subject to comprehensive regulation by ANATEL. In particular, interconnection rates for fixed-line and mobile services in the Brazilian telecommunications industry have been subject to comprehensive reductions in recent years.

In July 2014, ANATEL approved rules under which interconnection rates charged by our company for the use of our fixed-line and mobile networks would be reduced over a period of years until they were set at rates based on along-run incremental cost methodology. The MTR tariffs that we charged to terminate calls on our mobile networks were reduced by 83%85.5% from December 31, 20152016 to December 31, 20182019 and were reduced by 47%0.4% in February 2019.2020. In addition, theTU-RL andTU-RIU tariffs that we charged to terminate calls on our fixed-line networks were reduced by 82%76.2% from December 31, 20152016 to December 31, 20182019 and were reduced by an average of 40%9.7% in February 2019.2020.

These rate reductions have been a primary reason for the decline in our mobile interconnection revenue to R$257 million during the year ended December 31, 2019 from R$448 million during 2018 and from R$500 million during 2017, and from R$627 million during 2016, and the decline in our fixed-line interconnection revenue to R$43 million during the year ended December 31, 2019 from R$53 million during 2018 and from R$71 million during 2017 and from R$113 million during 2016.2017. However, these rate reductions have also led to a substantial reduction of our interconnection costs, which have declined to R$487 million during the year ended December 31, 2019 from R$658 million during 2018 fromand R$778 million during 2017 and R$1,173 million during 2016.2017.

As a result of the substantial reductions in our interconnection costs, and in keeping with our strategy of simplifying our portfolios to enhance our customers’ experience, since 2015 we have been offering fixed-line and mobile plans that allowall-net calls for a flat fee.

Effects of Claims by ANATEL that Our Company Has Not Fully Complied with Our Quality of Service and Other Obligations

As a fixed-line service provider, we must comply with the provisions of the PGMQ.RGQ. As a public regime service provider, we must comply with the network expansion and modernization obligations under the PGMU and our concession agreements. Our personal mobile services authorizations set forth certain network expansion obligations and targets and impose obligations on us to meet quality of service standards. In addition, we must comply with regulations of general applicability promulgated by ANATEL, which generally relate to quality of service measures.

If we fail to meet quality goals established by ANATEL under the PGMQ,RGQ, fail to meet the network expansion and modernization targets established by ANATEL under the PGMU and our concession agreements, fail to comply with our obligations under our personal mobile services authorizations or fail to comply with our obligations under other ANATEL regulations, we may be subject to warnings, fines, intervention by ANATEL, temporary suspensions of service or cancellation of our concessions and authorizations.

On an almost weekly basis, we receive inquiries from ANATEL requiring information from us on our compliance with the various service obligations imposed on us by our concession agreements. If we are unable to respond satisfactorily to those inquiries or comply with our service obligations under our concession agreements, ANATEL may commence administrative proceedings in connection with such noncompliance. We have received numerous notices of commencement of administrative proceedings from ANATEL, mostly due to our inability to achieve certain targets established in the PGMQRGQ and the PGMU.

At the time that ANATEL notifies us it believes that we have failed to comply with our obligations, we evaluate the claim and, based on our assessment of the probability of loss relating to that claim, may establish a provision. We vigorously contest a substantial number of the assessments made against us.us by ANATEL. As of December 31, 2018,2019, the total estimated contingency in connection with all pending administrative proceedings brought by ANATEL against us in which we deemed the risk of loss as probable totaled R$580570 million, including fines which we are contesting through judicial proceedings, and we had recorded an aggregate provision related to these proceedings in the same amount.

Effect of Level of Indebtedness and Interest Rates

As of December 31, 2018,2019, we had loanstotal outstanding borrowings and financings of R$30,37931,642 million, excluding the fair value adjustment to our loansborrowings and financings and debt issuance costs, and R$16,45018,227 million, after giving effect to the fair value adjustment.adjustment and debt issuance costs.

Borrowing and financing costs consist of interest on borrowings payable to third parties, inflation and exchange losses on third-party borrowings and gains and losses on derivative financial instruments as set forth in note 6 to our audited consolidated financial statements included in this prospectus. As a result of the commencement of the RJ Proceedings, we ceased recording borrowing and financing costs of our continuing operations with respect to our loans and financings. As a result of the confirmation of the RJ Plan, our obligations under the our restructured indebtedness began to accrue interest as of the Brazilian Confirmation Date and we recorded interest expenses and foreign exchange gains and losses on our restructured loans and financing as part of our financial expenses, net in the aggregate amount of R$4,046 million during 2018.annual report.

As a result of the implementation of the RJ Plan, most of our obligations under our restructured indebtedness accrues interest at fixed-rates in U.S. dollars. However, our obligations under our restructured debentures and our restructured Brazilian credit agreements and Real Estate Receivables Certificates (Certificados de Recebíveis Imobiliários), or CRIs, accrue interest based on the CDI rate and our obligations under our restructured credit agreements with BNDES accrue interest based on the TJLP rate. As a result, increases in the CDI rate or the TJLP rate will increase our interest expenses and debt service obligations.

In addition, the RJ Plan permits us to seek to raise up to R$2.5 billion in the capital markets and seek to borrow up to R$2 billion under new export credit facilities. This debt may accrue interest at floating rates and/or be denominated in foreign currencies. Accordingly, we may incur interest expenses and foreign exchange gains and losses in connection with this debt, if incurred.

Effects of Fluctuations in Exchange Rates between the Real and the U.S. Dollar

Substantially all of our cost of services and operating expenses in Brazil are incurred inreais. As a result, the appreciation or depreciation of thereal against the U.S. dollar does not have a material effect on our operating margins. However, the costs of a substantial portion of the network equipment that we purchase for our capital expenditure projects are denominated in U.S. dollars or are U.S. dollar-linked. As a result, depreciation of thereal against the U.S. dollar results in this network equipment being more costly inreais and leads to increased depreciation expenses. Conversely, appreciation of thereal against the U.S. dollar results in this network equipment being less costly inreais and leads to reduced depreciation expenses.

As a result of the confirmation of the RJ Plan, our obligations under the our restructured Export Credit Agreements, our PIK Toggle Notes and ourNon-Qualified Credit Agreement are denominated in U.S. dollars and will accrue interest in U.S. dollars.

As a result, when thereal appreciates against the U.S. dollar:

 

  

the interest costs on our indebtedness denominated in U.S. dollars will decline inreais, which will positively affect our results of operations inreais;

 

  

the amount of our indebtedness denominated in U.S. dollars will decline inreais, and our total liabilities and debt service obligations inreaiswilldecline; and

 

our financial expense, net will decline as a result of foreign exchange gains that we record.

A depreciation of therealagainst the U.S. dollar will have the converse effects.

The significant depreciation of thereal subsequent to December 31, 2019, partially due to theCOVID-19 pandemic and the public health measures adopted to combat the pandemic in Brazil and internationally, is expected to have adverse effects on the carrying amount of our U.S. dollar-denominated indebtedness and interest expenses and thereal costs of our U.S. dollar-denominated capital expenditure and operating lease costs. In the short-term, we do not believe that this depreciation will have a significant adverse effect on our ability to obtain network equipment for our capital expenditure projects.

Effects of Inflation

Because substantially all of our cost of services and operating expenses are incurred inreais in Brazil, an increase in inflation has the effect of increasing our operating expenses and reducing our margins. Although we have taken significant measures to control and reduce operating expenses during the past three years, the benefits of these measures were reduced as a result of the countervailing impact of Brazilian inflation during that time. Although our regulated rates are subject to annual adjustment based on the rate of inflation as measured by the IST, the majority of our revenue is generated from services delivered at rates that are not regulated or that are provided at a discount to the regulated rates as a result of competitive pressures in the Brazilian telecommunications market. As a result, we may not be able to pass through our increased operating costs and expenses resulting from inflationary pressures through to our customers as incurred in the form of higher tariffs for our services.

As a result of the confirmation of the RJ Plan, our obligations under our debentures and restructured Brazilian credit agreements and CRIs have accrued interest based on the CDI rate, which is partiallycould be adjusted forin the event of a significant increase in inflation in Brazil, since the Brazilian Confirmation Date. As a result, inflation could increasepotentially have an indirect impact on our interest expenses and debt service obligations.

Seasonality

Our primary business operations do not have material seasonal operations, other than our sales of handsets and accessories in our Personal Mobility business which tends to increase during the fourth quarter of each year as compared to the other three fiscal quarters related to significant increases of volume during theyear-end holiday shopping season.

Recent Developments

IssuanceSale of New Shares on Exercise of WarrantsPT Ventures

On January 4, 2019, our board24, 2020, Africatel sold and transferred 100% of directors confirmed the issuanceshare capital of 275,985 Common Shares and the deliveryPT Ventures to Sonangol for an aggregate purchase price of such Common SharesUS$1 billion, of which US$61 million was paid to holders of its Warrants that exercised their Warrants from December 4, 2018 through January 2, 2019, including Warrants represented by 55,197 ADWs that were exercised from November 28, 2018 through December 26, 2018.

All Warrants that were not exercised on orAfricatel prior to January 2, 2019, including all ADWs that were not exercised on or prior to December 26, 2018, have been canceled.

Preemptive Offering and Closing Under Commitment Agreement

As contemplated by Section 6the transfer of the RJ Plan,shares, and Sonangol paid US$699 million in cash on November 13, 2018, we commenced a preemptive offering of Common Shares that was registered with the SEC under the Securities Act under which holders of our Common Shares and Preferred Shares, including the ADS Depositary andclosing date. The Bank of New York Mellon, as depositaryremaining US$240 million of the Preferred ADS program,purchase price is to be paid to Africatel by Sonangol by July 31, 2020, with a guaranteed minimum monthly payment of US$40 million beginning in February 2020 and we have received 1.333630 transferable rights for each Common Share or Preferred Share held as of November 19, 2018. Each subscription right entitled its holder to subscribe to one Common Share at a subscription price of R$1.24 per Common Share. In addition, each holder of a subscription right was entitled to request the subscription for additional Common Shares.

The subscription rights expired on January 4, 2019. On January 16, 2019, we issued 1,530,457,356 Common Shares to holders of subscription rights that had exercised those subscription rights with respect to the Common Shares, including the depositaries under our ADS Deposit Agreements. On January 21, 2019, we issued 91,080,933 Common Shares to holders of subscription rights that had requested subscriptions for excess Common Shares, including the depositaries under our ADS Deposit Agreements. The proceeds of these subscriptions was R$2,011 million.

On January 25, 2019, we issued 1,604,268,162 Common Shares, representing the total number of Common Shares that were offeredminimum monthly payments due in the preemptive offering less the total number of initial Common SharesFebruary and excess Common Shares, to the Backstop Investors in a private placement under the termsMarch 2020. Payment of the Commitment Agreement for the aggregate amountremaining purchase price is fully guaranteed by a letter of R$1,989 million. In addition, under the terms of the Commitment Agreement, on that date we issued 272,148,705 Common Shares in a private placementcredit. Pursuant to the Backstop Investors and paid US$13 million to the Backstop Investors as compensation for their commitments under the Commitment Agreement.

Pharol Settlement Agreement

On January 8, 2019, Oi, Bratel and Pharol entered into the Pharol Settlement Agreement, which provides, among other things, for the termination of all existing litigation involving Oi, Bratel and Pharol in Brazil and abroad.

As a resultwe deposited 34 million euros of the Pharol Settlement Agreement, Oi, Bratel and Pharol filed motions requesting the suspensionproceeds of all pending proceedings, suits and appealsthis sale in Brazil and Portugal involving Oi, Bratel and Pharol for 60 days or until the RJ Court confirms the Pharol Settlement Agreement, whichever occurs first.

Under the Pharol Settlement Agreement Oi is required to: (1) pay Bratel an amount in U.S. dollars corresponding to €25 million, which under the Pharol Settlement Agreement was used by Pharol for the subscription of 85,721,774 common shares issued by Oi in the preemptive offering; and (2) upon confirmation of the Pharol Settlement Agreement by the RJ Court, (a) transfer to Bratel 32,000,000 Common Shares and 1,800,000 Preferred Shares held in treasury, (b) pay Pharol the annual fees related to certain obligations assumed by Oi with respect to proceedings of Pharol in Portugal, and (c) in case of a sale of at least 50% of the shares of Unitel indirectly held by Oi, deposit into an escrow account an amount necessary to guarantee the payment of any potential liabilities of Pharol incover losses relating to certain tax proceedings whose chanceagainst Pharol.

The principal assets of loss is assessed as possible or probable.

On February 28, 2019, the RJ Court confirmed the Pharol Settlement AgreementPT Ventures included (1) a 25% stake in Unitel, (2) a 40% stake in Multitel Serviços de Telecomunicações Lda., (3) rights to dividends previously declared by Unitel, but not received by PT Ventures, and (4) all rights arising from a decision publishedfinal award in the Official Gazetteamount of the State of Rio de Janeiro on March 12, 2019. This decision became final on April 3, 2019.

On February 28, 2019, the RJ Court confirmed the Pharol Settlement Agreement by a decision publishedapproximately US$659 million in the Official Gazette of the State of Rio de Janeiro on March 12, 2019. This decision became final on April 3, 2019. Since that date, in accordance with the Pharol Settlement Agreement, Oi has paid Bratel an amount in U.S. dollars corresponding to €25 million and transferred to Bratel 32,000,000 common shares and 1,800,000 preferred shares of Oi held in treasury.

ICC Award in Arbitration Against Unitel Shareholders

On February 27, 2019, we were notified of the final decision issued by the arbitral tribunal under the arbitration proceeding filedinitiated by our subsidiary PT Ventures against the other Unitel shareholders.

Sale of Botafogo Property

On February 21, 2020, we sold our property at Rua General Polidoro nº 99, Botafogo, Rio de Janeiro, to Alianza Gestão de Recursos Ltda. for R$120.5 million.

Issuance of Oi Mobile Debentures

In February 2020, an investor subscribed to an aggregate amount of R$2,500 million of Oi Mobile’snon-convertible secured debentures. These debentures are guaranteed by Oi and Telemar and are secured by a pledge of cash flows from our receivables in an amount up to R$200 million per month and a first-priority lien on our right to use mobile frequencies. These debentures mature in January 2022 in the event that we raise more than R$5 billion from our divestments by July 31, 2020, and will amortize at a rate of R$100 million per month beginning in August 2020 through January 2022 in the event that we do not achieve this divestment target. These debentures bear PIK interest, capitalized monthly, through January 2021 at a rate of 12.66% per annum based on the daily U.S. dollar equivalent principal amount determined in accordance with the daily exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the Brazilianreal, and interest at a rate of 13.61% per annum, payable in cash, thereafter.

Extension of the Judicial Reorganization Proceedings

The arbitral tribunal ruledBrazilian Bankruptcy Law provides that the other Unitel shareholders had violated several provisionsRJ Proceedings and the judicial supervision of Unitel’s Shareholders’ Agreement, among other matters.the RJ Debtors may be terminated on the second anniversary of the Brazilian Confirmation Date if the RJ Court determines that all obligations provided for in the RJ Plan have been satisfied based on the analysis of compliance with the RJ Plan.

The arbitral tribunal orderedOn December 6, 2019, we filed a petition with the other Unitel shareholdersRJ Court requesting that the judicial supervision of the RJ Debtors not be terminated on February 5, 2020, the second anniversary of the Brazilian Confirmation Date, in order to jointlyallow us to continue to execute the RJ Plan and severally pay PT Venturesremain focused on our strategic transformation. Notwithstanding the amountconclusion of US$339.4 million correspondingthe restructuring of the RJ Debtor’s financial debt in accordance with the applicable terms and conditions set forth in the RJ Plan, we presented to the loss of value of PT Ventures’ stake in Unitel, plus interest from February 20, 2019 at12-month U.S. dollar LIBOR +2%, compounded annually. The arbitral tribunal also ordered the other Unitel shareholders to jointly and severally pay PT Ventures the amount of US$307 million correspondingRJ Court circumstances related to the damages arisingcomplexity inherent to the magnitude of the RJ Proceedings and the ongoing reforms in the legal-regulatory environment, which we believe require additional measures yet to be implemented under the RJ Proceedings.

On February 27, 2020, we filed a petition with the RJ Court requesting that we be permitted to submit to our creditors for their consideration and deliberation at a new general creditors’ meeting a proposed amendment to the RJ Plan designed to achieve greater operational and financial flexibility for our company to continue with investments and the fulfillment of our strategic plan. At the new general creditors’ meeting, only creditors of the RJ Debtors that held credits and had voting rights at the time of the original GCM and who continued to hold an interest in the debt obligations or equity securities of the RJ Debtors on February 27, 2020 will be entitled to vote.

On March 6, 2020, the RJ Court issued a decision granting our request to hold a new general creditors’ meeting to deliberate on a proposed amendment to the RJ Plan. The RJ Court required that:

the RJ Debtors must submit the proposed amendment to the RJ Plan to the RJ Court on or prior to September 8, 2020; and

the new general creditors’ meeting organized by the Judicial Administrator must take place within 60 days from the other Unitel’s shareholders’ failuredate of submission of the proposed amendment to ensure that PT Ventures received the same amountRJ Plan to the RJ Court by the RJ Debtors.

We intend to seek to amend the RJ Plan in order to facilitate asset sales contemplated by our strategic plan, including the potential sale of dividends in foreign currency as the other Unitel foreign shareholder. This amount is subject to interest at an annual rate of 7%, starting at various dates in 2013. In addition, the arbitral tribunal ordered the other Unitel shareholders to pay a substantial portion of PT Ventures’ legal fees and costsour mobile business and the administrativeproposed sales of othernon-core assets. We continue to discuss the terms of the proposed amendment with various constituencies of our company and arbitrators’ fees and expenses, incan provide no assurances with respect to the aggregate net amountspecific terms of approximately US$13 million. The arbitral tribunal also entirely dismissed the counterclaim and agreed with PT Venturesproposed amendment that will be presented to the conditions for exercising the right of first refusal to acquire PT Ventures’ 25% shareholding in Unitel had not been triggered. For more information, see “Item 8. Financial Information—Legal Proceedings—Legal Proceedings Relating to Our Interest in Unitel.”

Repurchases of Preferred Shares over the B3

During the month of February 2019, we repurchased a total of 1,800,000 Preferred Shares over the B3 at prices ranging between R$1.42 and R$1.44 per Preferred Share, for an aggregate purchase price of R$2.6 million.RJ Court.

Results of Operations

The following discussion of our results of operations is based on our audited consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with US GAAP.IFRS. In the following discussion, references to increases or decreases in any period are made by comparison with the corresponding prior period, except as the context otherwise indicates.

Year Ended December 31, 20182019 Compared with Year Ended December 31, 20172018

The following table sets forth the components of our consolidated income statement, as well as the percentage change from the prior year, for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.

   Year ended December 31, 
   2019   2018   %
Change
 
   (in millions ofreais, except
percentages)
 

Net operating revenue

   R$20,136    R$22,060    (8.7) 

Cost of sales and services

   (15,315)    (16,179)    (5.3) 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

Gross profit

   4,821    5,881    (18.0) 

Operating income (expenses)

      

Selling expenses

   (3,548)    (3,853)    (7.9) 

General and administrative expenses

   (2,782)    (2,739)    1.6 

Other operating income (expenses), net

   (1,469)    (4,557)    (67.8) 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

Operating loss before financial expenses, net, and taxes

   (2,977)    (5,268)    (43.5) 

Financial income (expenses), net

   (6,110)    26,609    (123.0) 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

Profit (loss) before taxes

   (9,087)    21,341    (142.6) 

Income tax and social contribution

   (8)    3,275    (100.2) 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

Profit (loss)

   R$(9,095)    R$24,616    (136.9) 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

Net Operating Revenue

The following table sets forth the components of our net operating revenue, as well as the percentage change from the prior year, for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.

   Year ended December 31, 
   2019   2018   %
Change
 
   (in millions ofreais, except
percentages)
 

Telecommunications in Brazil Segment:

      

Residential customer services:

      

Residential fixed-line services

   R$3,282    R$4,170    (21.3) 

Broadband services

   2,187    2,423    (9.8) 

Pay TV services

   1,752    1,755    (0.2) 

Fixed-line interconnection

   43    53    (18.5) 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   
   7,264    8,402    (13.5) 

Personal mobility services

      

Mobile telephony services

   6,602    6,608    (0.1) 

Mobile interconnection

   257    448    (42.6) 

Sales of handsets, SIM cards and other accessories

   158    195    (18.7) 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   
   7,017    7,250    (3.2) 

B2B services

   5,528    5,981    (7.6) 

Other services

   140    227    (38.3) 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   
   19,949    21,860    (8.7) 

Other operations(1)

   187    200    (6.7) 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

Net operating revenue

   R$20,136    R$22,060    (8.7) 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

(1)

Other operations includes the net operating revenue of Africatel.

Net operating revenue of our Telecommunications in Brazil segment declined by 8.7% during 2019, principally due to a 13.5% decline in net operating revenue from residential services, and to a lesser extent, a 7.6% decline in net operating revenue from B2B services, and a 3.2% decline in net operating revenue from personal mobility services.

Net Operating Revenue from Residential Customer Services

Net operating revenue from residential customer services represented 36.1% of our net operating revenue during 2019. Residential customer services include fixed telephony services, including voice services, data communication services (broadband), andPay-TV. Net operating revenue from residential services declined by 13.5%, primarily due to (1) the 14.2% decline in the number of residential RGUs, (2) the decline in voice traffic, and (3) the reduction inTU-RL andTU-RIU fixed line interconnection tariffs and VCfixed-to-mobile tariffs in February 2019 and February 2018.

Net Operating Revenue from Residential Fixed-Line Services

Net operating revenue from residential fixed-line services declined by 21.3% during 2019, primarily due to a 15.4% decline in the number of residential fixed lines in service to 7.0 million as of December 31, 2019 2019 from 8.3 million as of December 31, 2018, as a result of the general trend in the Brazilian telecommunications industry to substitute mobile services in place of local fixed-line services and the corresponding reduction in voice service traffic. The effects of these factors were partially offset by the migration of our fixed-line customer base to convergent service offerings and other plans offering unlimited minutes of usage, which generate greater revenue per user.

Net Operating Revenue from Broadband Services

Net operating revenue from residential broadband services, which includes broadband services delivered through both our copper and fiber networks, declined by 9.8% during 2019, primarily as a result of (1) a 13.9% decline in the number of our residential ADSL subscribers to 4.2 million as of December 31, 2019 from 4.9 million as of December 31, 2018, and (2) a 1.6% decline in the average net operating revenue per subscriber from broadband services. As of December 31, 2019, our xDSL subscribers represented 60.0% of our total residential fixed lines in service and subscribed to plans with an average speed of 33.3 Mbps as compared to 59.0% of our total residential fixed lines in service at an average speed of 9.8 Mbps as of December 31, 2018. The substantial increase in average speed of our residential broadband subscriptions primarily reflects the success of our program to increase subscriptions over our expanding FTTH network.

Net Operating Revenue fromPay-TV Services

Net operating revenue from residentialPay-TV services declined by 0.2% during 2019, primarily as a result of an 8.5% decline in the number of our residentialPay-TV subscribers to 1.45 million as of December 31, 2019 from 1.59 million as of December 31, 2018, the effects of which were partially offset by a 0.3% increase in the average net operating revenue per subscriber. As of December 31, 2019, ourPay-TV subscribers represented 20.7% of our total residential fixed lines in service as compared to 19.2% of our total residential fixed lines in service as of December 31, 2018.

Net Operating Revenue from Personal Mobility Services

Net operating revenue from personal mobility services represented 34.8% of our net operating revenue during 2019. Personal mobility services include sales of mobile telephony services to post-paid andpre-paid customers that include voice services and data communication services. Net operating revenue from personal mobility services declined by 3.2%, primarily due to a 2.8% decline in revenue from mobile telephony services.

Net Operating Revenue from Mobile Telephony Services

Net operating revenue from mobile telephony services declined by 0.1%, primarily due to a 10.3% decline in the number of mobile customers that subscribe to our prepaid plans to 24.5 million as of December 31, 2019 from 27.3 million as of December 31, 2018, principally as a result of (1) Brazil’s continuing high unemployment rate as our sales net additions of prepaid subscribers is closely correlated to movements in the unemployment rate, (2) the migration of prepaid customers in Brazil to the use of a single SIM card as operators have increased the offer of“all-net” plans following the successive reductions of the MTR tariffs, and (3) our strict disconnection policy for inactive customers, which is designed to reduce fee payments that we must make for each active account.

The effects of these declines were partially offset by a 23.1% increase in the number of mobile customers that subscribed to our postpaid plans to 9.5 million as of December 31, 2019 from 7.7 million as of December 31, 2018. During 2019, data revenue represented 84.1% of net operating revenue from mobile telephony services compared to 71.7% during 2018.

Net Operating Revenue from Interconnection to Our Mobile Network

Mobile interconnection revenue declined by 42.6% during 2019, primarily as a result of the reduction in MTR tariffs in February 2019 and February 2018, the effects of which were partially offset by an increase in interconnection traffic.

Net Operating Revenue from Sales of Handsets, SIM Cards and Other Accessories

Revenue from handsets, SIM cards and other accessories declined by 18.7% during 2019, primarily as a result of the reduction in sales volume of handsets due to our policy of not subsidizing the sale of this product.

Net Operating Revenue from B2B Services

Net operating revenue from B2B services represented 27.5% of our net operating revenue during 2019. B2B services include corporate solutions offered to our small,medium-sized, large corporate customers, including voice services and corporate data solutions, and wholesale customers.Net operating revenue from B2B services declined by 7.6%, primarily as a result of (1) lower voice traffic, following the natural market trend, (2) the reduction in MTR tariffs and VCfixed-to-mobile tariffs in February 2019 and February 2018, and (3) the slow recovery of Brazilian economic activity, which has led to efforts by corporate and government customers to reduce costs, including telecommunications services costs, and has led to the downsizing or closing of many of our SME customers.

The total number of our B2B customers declined by 2.0% to 6.6 million as of December 31, 2019 from 6.7 million as of December 31, 2018, as the 5.9% decline in the number of B2B fixed-line customers more than offset the 4.1% increase in the number of B2B mobile customers.

Operating Expenses

Under the Brazilian Corporate Law, we are required to segregate cost of sales and services from operating expenses in the preparation of our statement of operations. However, in evaluating and managing our business, we prepare reports in which we review the elements included in cost of sales and services and operating expenses classified by nature, as presented in note 5 of our audited consolidated financial statements. We believe that this classification improves our ability to understand results and trends in our business and that financial analysts and other investors who review our performance rely on this classification in performing their own analysis. Therefore, we have presented the discussion below of our operating expenses based on the classification of operating expenses presented in note 5 of our audited consolidated financial statements.

The following table sets forth the components of our operating expenses, as well as the percentage change from the prior year, for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2019   2018   %
Change
 
   (in millions ofreais, except
percentages)
 

Third-party services

   R$6,031    R$5,925    1.8 

Depreciation and amortization

   6,874    5,811    18.3 

Rental and insurance

   2,576    4,200    (38.7) 

Personnel

   2,529    2,594    (2.5) 

Network maintenance services

   1,014    1,104    (8.1) 

Interconnection

   487    658    (25.9) 

Provision for contingencies

   216    202    7.0 

Expected losses on trade receivables

   489    697    (29.8) 

Advertising and publicity

   497    382    30.1 

Handsets and other costs

   171    196    (13.0) 

Impairment losses

   2,111    291    623.6 

Taxes and other expenses

   111    250    (55.7) 

Other operating income (expenses), net

   (7)    (5,016)    (99.9) 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total cost of sales and services

   R$23,114    R$27,328    (15.4) 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

Operating expenses declined by 15.4% during 2019, principally due to (1) a decline in other operating expenses, net to R$7 million during 2019 from R$5,016 million during 2018, and (2) a 38.7%, or R$1,624 million, decline in rental and insurance costs to R$2,576 million during 2019 from R$4,200 million during 2018. The effects of these factors was partially offset by (1) an increase in impairment losses to R$2,111 million during 2019 from R$292 million during 2018, and (2) an 18.3% increase in depreciation and amortization expenses to R$6,874 million during 2019 from R$5,811 million during 2018.

Third-Party Services

Third-party service costs increased by 1.8% during 2019, primarily as a result of increased selling expenses due to the intensification of our commercial activity.

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization costs increased by 18.3% during 2019, primarily as a result of our implementation of IFRS 16 on January 1, 2019 as a result of which we recorded R$947 million of depreciation and amortization expenses with respect to right of use of assets during 2019.

Rental and Insurance

Rental and insurance costs declined by 38.7% during 2019, primarily as a result of our implementation of IFRS 16 on January 1, 2019 as a result of which our lease expenses declined by R$1,551 million during 2019.

Personnel

Personnel expenses (including employee benefits and social charges and employee and management profit sharing) declined by 2.5% during 2019, principally due to a 3.9% decline in direct employee expenses, including wages, taxes and benefits, the effects of which were partially offset by a 9.0% increase in profit sharing and provisions for profit sharing as a result of our achieving the objectives of these programs.

Network Maintenance Services

Network maintenance services costs declined by 8.1% during 2019, primarily as a result of (1) lower maintenance costs related to payphones following the approval of the PGMU, (2) the successful renegotiation of some of our maintenance contracts, and (3) a lower number of maintenance incidents as a result of our initiatives focused on preventive actions and productivity improvements, which have been increasing the efficiency of field operations, as well as efficiency gains arising from the digitalization of processes and customer service.

Interconnection

Interconnection costs declined by 25.9% during 2019, primarily as a result of the declines in MTR tariffs and theTU-RL andTU-RIU interconnection tariffs that were implemented in February 2019 and February 2018, the effects of which were partially offset by an increase in interconnection traffic.

Provision for Contingencies

Provision for contingencies increased by 7.0% during 2019, primarily as a result of our revision of the methodology used to calculate the provisions for losses in labor lawsuits and civil lawsuits related to the financial interest agreements described under “Item 8. Financial Information—Legal Proceedings—Civil Claims Relating to Oi S.A. and Our Brazilian Operations—Financial Interest Agreements (PEX and PCT)” due to the revisions to our estimate model as a result of the history of terminations of lawsuits under the RJ Plan and our increased accumulated experience with estimating these losses.

Expected Losses on Trade Receivables

Expected losses on trade receivables declined by 29.8% during 2019, primarily as a result of a reduction in our level of customer defaults, particularly in our B2B business. During 2019, expected losses on trade receivables represented 2.4% of our net operating revenue compared to 3.2% during 2018.

Advertising and Publicity

Advertising and publicity expenses increased by 30.1% during 2019, primarily as a result of an intensification of our advertising campaigns, particularly for our FTTH services and personal mobility services.

Handsets and Other Costs

Handsets and other costs declined by 13.0% during 2019, primarily due to the reduction in sales volume of handsets due to our policy of not subsidizing the sale of this product.

Impairment Losses

We recorded impairment losses of R$2,111 million during 2019 as a result of our testing of ournon-current assets for impairment under IAS 36 as of December 31, 2019, primarily due to (1) the revision of our strategic plan, focused on improving operating and financial performance, using a sustainable business model that is designed to maximize the Company’s value in the context of our judicial reorganization; and (2) increased market competitiveness, mainly in the residential market, which accelerated the decline in the revenues from fixed-line services and DTH services. This impairment loss was fully allocated to the carrying value of our regulatory licenses. We recorded impairment losses of R$292 million during 2018, consisting of a supplementary adjustment to the recognized allowance for impairment losses related to expected future profitability of assets with finite useful lives.

Taxes and Other Expenses

Taxes and other expenses declined by 55.7% during 2019, primarily due to a decrease in other tax expenses, as a result of a decline in other revenues to which other taxes are associated, and a decrease in expenses for fines.

Other Operating Income (Expenses), Net

Other operating expenses, net was R$7 million during 2019, consisting primarily of the effects the accounting recognition during 2019 of R$1,518 million of PIS and COFINS credits as the result of a final and unappealable court decision permitting us to deduct ICMS from our tax base for the purposes of calculation PIS and COFINS and the recovery of previous overpayments of PIS and COFINS, the effects of which were partially offset by (1) the recognition of R$1,231 million of expenses for provisions related to the recognition of onerous contract arising from the provision of satellite capacity, and (2) the derecognition during 2019 of R$167 million related to the reconciliation of tax credits and tax incentives from prior periods that we do not expect to be realized.

Other operating expenses, net was R$5,016 million during 2018 consisting primarily of (1) the recognition of R$4,884 million of expenses for provisions related to the recognition of onerous contract for the supply of submarine cable capacity, and (2) the recognition of R$109 million of revenue from the reversal of a provision for contingencies due to the reprocessing of the provision estimate model considering the new profile for closing the lawsuits in a new context after approval and ratification of the RJ Plan.

Operating Profit before Financial Expenses, Net, and Taxes

As a result of the foregoing, our Telecommunications in Brazil segment recorded operating loss before financial expenses, net, and taxes of R$2,864 million during 2019 compared to operating profit before financial expenses, net, and taxes of R$5,185 million during 2018. As a percentage of net operating revenue, the operating loss before financial expenses, net, and taxes of our Telecommunications in Brazil segment was 14.4% during 2019 and operating loss before financial expenses, net, and taxes of our Telecommunications in Brazil segment was 23.7% during 2018.

Operating expenses of our other operations increased by 6.1% to R$300 million during 2019 from R$283 million during 2018. The operating loss before financial expenses, net, and taxes of our other operations increased by 36.9% to R$113 million during 2019 from R$83 million during 2018. As a percentage of net operating revenue, the operating loss before financial expenses, net, and taxes of our other operations was 60.7% during 2019 and 41.4% during 2018.

Our consolidated operating loss before financial expenses, net, and taxes declined by 43.5% to R$2,977 million during 2019 from R$5,268 million during 2018. As a percentage of net operating revenue, operating loss before financial expenses, net, and taxes was 14.8% during 2019 and 23.9% during 2018.

Financial Expenses, Net

Financial Income

Financial income declined by 91.4% to R$2,662 million during 2019 from R$30,950 million during 2018, primarily due to (1) our recognition of the fair value of third-party borrowings and financing arising from the impacts of the ratification of the RJ Plan of R$49 million during 2019 compared to R$13,290 million during 2018, (2) our recording no gains or losses on our restructuring of our third-party borrowings during 2019 compared to our recording a R$11,055 million gains as a result of the novation of the debt represented by the Defaulted Bonds, calculated pursuant to the RJ Plan, during 2018, (3) our recording reversal of interest and other income of R$170 million during 2019 compared to R$4,080 million, primarily as a result of the reversal of the interest expenses on debt included in the RJ Plan, adjusted in the period prior to the Brazilian Confirmation Date, of R$3,013 million and adjustment of trade payables and default payment to present value of R$877 million, during 2018, and (4) our recording inflation adjustment and foreign exchange difference on the fair value adjustment of R$334 million during 2019 compared to R$1,399 million during 2018.

The effects of these factors was partially offset by our recording interest and inflation adjustment to other assets of R$1,922 million during 2019, primarily consisting of R$2,100 million related to the monetary restatement on PIS and COFINS credits resulting from the exclusion of ICMS from its calculation base and the recovery of previous overpayments of PIS and COFINS, compared to interest and inflation adjustment to other assets of R$809 million during 2018.

Financial Expenses

Financial expenses increased by 102.0% to R$8,772 million during 2019 from R$4,342 million during 2018, primarily as a result of:

our recording interest expenses on borrowings and debentures payable to third parties of R$1,618 million during 2019 compared to our recording a reversal of interest expenses on borrowings and debentures payable to third parties of R$1,793 million, primarily as a result of the reversal of interest on debt included in the RJ Plan of R$3,115 million, partially offset by interest expenses on borrowings and debentures payable to third parties of R$1,362 million, during 2018;

our recording reversals of inflation adjustments to provisions of R$1,620 million during 2019 compared to R$227 million during 2018, principally as a result of (1) our revision of the methodology used to calculate the provisions for losses in labor lawsuits and civil lawsuits during 2019 due to the revisions to our estimate model as a result of the history of terminations of lawsuits under the RJ Plan and our increased accumulated experience with estimating these losses, and (2) our reversal of a portion of our provision for contingencies and the related inflation adjustment during 2019 as a result of the revisions to our estimate model to take into account the new profile and history of discontinuation of lawsuits in the context of the approval and ratification of the RJ Plan;

our recording R$949 million in interest on leases during 2019 as a result of our implementation of IFRS 16 on January 1, 2019;

a 48.2%, or R$603 million, increase in interest on and inflation adjustment to other liabilities to R$1,854 during 2019 from R$1,251 million during 2018, principally as a result of our recording R$742 million of exchange rate loss and amortization of deferred gains relating to the present value adjustment of our onerous obligation recorded at the end of 2018; and

our recording a R$238 million loss on cash investments classified asheld-for-sale during 2019, primarily as a result of a R$404 million loss recorded based on our revision of the fair value of the cash investment and dividends receivable in Unitel, the effects of which were partially offset by a R$165 million exchange rate gain due to the 4.0% depreciation of thereal against the U.S. dollar during this period, compared to a R$293 million gain during 2018, principally as a result of (1) a R$829 million exchange rate gain due to the 17.1% depreciation of thereal against the U.S. dollar, during this period, and (2) R$142 million recorded with respect to our portion of dividends approved by Unitel related to Unitel’s 2017 fiscal year, the effects of which were partially offset by a R$678 million loss recorded based on our revision of the fair value of the cash investment and the revision of the recoverable amount of dividends receivable from Unitel;

The effects of these factors were partially offset by a 74.3%, or R$1,854 million, decline in inflation and exchange gains on third-party borrowings to R$640 million during 2019 from R$2,494 million during 2018, principally as a result of the positive impact on our U.S. dollar-denominated debt of the 4.0% depreciation of thereal against the U.S. dollar during 2019 as compared to the 17.1% depreciation of thereal against the U.S. dollar during 2018, as well as our recording capital gains associated to the novation of debts arising on the Defaulted Bonds of R$555 million during 2019.

Income Tax and Social Contribution

The composite corporate statutory income tax and social contribution rate was 34% during 2019 and 2018. We recorded an income tax and social contribution expense of R$8 million during 2019 compared to an income tax and social contribution benefit of R$3,275 million during 2018. The effective tax rate applicable to our loss before taxes was (0.1)% during 2019 and the effective tax rate applicable to our profit before taxes was (15.3)% during 2018. The table below sets forth a reconciliation of the composite corporate statutory income tax and social contribution rate to our effective tax rate for each of the periods presented.

   Year Ended
December 31,
 
   2019  2018 

Composite corporate statutory income tax and social contribution rate

   34.0  34.0

Equity in investees

   0.0   0.0 

Tax incentives

   0.0   0.0 

Permanent Deductions(add-backs)

   (3.4  (62.3

Reversal of (allowance for) impairment losses on deferred tax assets

   (27.2  12.9 

Tax effects of deferred tax assets of foreign subsidiaries

   (3.4  0.0 

Effective rate

   (0.1)%   (15.3)% 

The effective tax rate applicable to our loss before taxes was (0.1)% during 2019, resulting in a tax expense despite our generating a loss before taxes, primarily as a result of (1) the tax effects of a valuation allowance for impairment losses on deferred tax assets that were recognized for the companies that as of December 31, 2019, do not expect to generate sufficient future taxable profits against which these tax assets could be offset, which resulted in a decline in our tax assets by R$2,474 million and reduced the effective tax rate applicable to our loss before taxes by 27.2%, (2) the tax effects of permanentadd-backs, mostly as a result of the effects of the recognition of the amortization of deferred gains relating to the fair value adjustment due to the restructured liabilities after confirmation of the RJ Plan, which reduced the effective tax rate applicable to our loss before taxes by 3.4%, and, (3) the tax effects of unrecognized deferred tax assets regarding foreign subsidiaries that are not eligible to recognize tax credits on tax loss carryforwards, which reduced the effective tax rate applicable to our loss before taxes by 3.4%.

The effective tax rate applicable to our income before taxes was (15.3)% during 2018, resulting in a tax benefit despite our generating income before taxes, primarily as a result of permanent deductions, mostly as a result of the effects of the novation of our debt obligations due to the confirmation of the RJ Plan, which reduced our effective tax rate by 62.3%. The effects of this factor was partially offset by the tax effects of a valuation allowance for impairment losses on deferred tax assets, which resulted in a decline in our tax assets by R$2,757 million, that were recognized for the companies that as at December 31, 2018, do not expect to generate sufficient future taxable profits against which these tax assets could be offset, which increased our effective tax rate by 12.9%.

Profit (Loss)

As a result of the foregoing, we recorded consolidated loss of R$9,095 million during 2019 compared to consolidated profit of R$24,616 million 2018. As a percentage of net operating revenue, our loss was 45.2% during 2019 compared to profit of 111.6% during 2018.

Year Ended December 31, 2018 Compared with Year Ended December 31, 2017

The following table sets forth the components of our consolidated statement of operations, as well as the percentage change from the prior year, for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.

 

  Year ended December 31,   

Year ended December 31,

  2018 2017 % Change   

2018

  

2017

  

% Change

  (in millions ofreais, except percentages)   (in millions ofreais, except percentages)

Net operating revenue

  R$22,060  R$23,790  (7.3  R$22,060  R$23,790  (7.3)

Cost of sales and services

   (15,823 (15,676 0.9   (16,179)  (15,669)  3.3
  

 

  

 

    

 

  

 

  

Gross profit

   6,237  8,114  (23.1  5,881  8,121  (27.6)

Operating income (expenses)

          

Selling expenses

   (4,478 (4,400 1.8   (3,853)  (4,103)  (6.1)

General and administrative expenses

   (2,698 (3,064 (12.0  (2,739)  (3,137)  (12.7)

Other operating income (expenses), net

   417  (1,043 n.m.   (4,557)  (3,242)  40.6

Reorganization items, net Other operating income (expenses), net

   31,581  (2,732 n.m. 
  

 

  

 

    

 

  

 

  

Operating loss before financial expenses, net, and taxes

   31,059  (2,767 n.m.   (5,268)  (2,361)  123.1

Financial expenses, net

   (4,012 (1,612 148.9 

Financial income (expenses), net

  26,609  (3,197)  n.m
  

 

  

 

    

 

  

 

  

Profit (loss) before taxes

   27,047  (4,379 n.m. 

Income (loss) before taxes

  21,341  (5,558)  n.m.

Income tax and social contribution

   347  351  (1.1  3,275  (1,099)  n.m.
  

 

  

 

    

 

  

 

  

Profit (loss)

  R$27,394  R$(4,027 n.m. 

Net income (loss)

  R$24,616  R$(6,656)  n.m.
  

 

  

 

    

 

  

 

  

 

n.m.

Not meaningful.

Net Operating Revenue

The following table sets forth the components of our net operating revenue, as well as the percentage change from the prior year, for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.

 

  Year ended December 31,   

Year ended December 31,

  2018   2017   % Change   

2018

  

2017

  

% Change

  (in millions of reais, except percentages)   (in millions ofreais, except percentages)

Telecommunications in Brazil Segment:

            

Residential

  R$8,402   R$9,171    (8.4

Personal mobility

   7,250    7,645    (5.2

B2B

   5,981    6,486    (7.8

Residential customer services:

      

Residential fixed-line services

  R$4,170  R$4,881  (14.6)

Broadband services

  2,423  2,642  (8.3)

Pay TV services

  1,755  1,578  11.2

Fixed-line interconnection

  53  71  (24.6)
  

 

  

 

  
  8,402  9,171  (8.4)

Personal mobility services

      

Mobile telephony services

  6,608  6,915  (4.4)

Mobile interconnection

  448  500  (10.4)

Sales of handsets, SIM cards and other accessories

  195  230  (15.1)
  

 

  

 

  
  7,250  7,645  (5.2)

B2B services

  5,981  6,486  (7.8)

Other services

   227    256    (11.2  227  256  (11.2)
  

 

   

 

     

 

  

 

  
  21,860   23,557   (7.2)   21,860  23,557  (7.2)

Other operations(1)

   200    233    (14.0

Other operations(1)

  200  233  (14.0)
  

 

   

 

     

 

  

 

  

Net operating revenue

  R$22,060   R$23,790    (7.3  R$22,060  R$23,790  (7.3)
  

 

   

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

(1)

Other operations includes the net operating revenue of Africatel.

Net operating revenue of our Telecommunications in Brazil segment declined by 7.2% during 2018, principally due to an 8.4% decline in net operating revenue from residential services, a 7.8% decline in net operating revenue from B2B services, and a 5.2% decline in net operating revenue from personal mobility services.

Net Operating Revenue from Residential Customer Services

Net operating revenue from residential customer services represented 38.1% of our net operating revenue during 2018. Residential customer services include fixed telephony services, including voice services, data communication services (broadband), andPay-TV.Net operating revenue from residential services declined by 8.4%, primarily due to (1) the 7.2% decline in the average number of residential RGUs, (2) the decline in voice traffic, and (3) the reduction inTU-RL andTU-RIU fixed line interconnection tariffs and VCfixed-to-mobile tariffs in February 2017 and February 2018. These effects were partially offset by the 0.6% increase in the average monthly net residential revenue per user (calculated based on the total revenue for the year divided by the monthly average customer base for the year divided by 12) to R$80.0 during 2018 from R$79.6 during 2017, primarily due to an increase in broadband andPay-TV revenues.

Net Operating Revenue from Residential Fixed-Line Services.

Net operating revenue from residential fixed-line services declined by 14.7%14.6%, primarily due to a 10.4% decline in the average number of residential fixed lines in service to 8.3 million duringas of December 31, 2018 from 9.2 million duringas of December 31, 2017, as a result of the general trend in the Brazilian telecommunications industry to substitute mobile services in place of local fixed-line services and the corresponding reduction in voice service traffic. The effects of these factors were partially offset by the migration of our fixed-line customer base to convergent service offerings and other plans offering unlimited minutes of usage, which generate greater revenue per user.

Net Operating Revenue from Broadband Services.

Net operating revenue from residential broadband services declined by 8.3%, primarily as a result of (1) a 6.8% decline in the average number of our residential ADSL subscribers to 4.84.9 million duringas of December 31, 2018 from 5.2 million duringas of December 31, 2017, and (2) a 5.4% decline in the average net operating revenue per subscriber from broadband services. As of December 31, 2018, our xDSL subscribers represented 58.4% of our total residential fixed lines in service and subscribed to plans with an average speed of 9.8 Mbps as compared to 55.8% of our total residential fixed lines in service at an average speed of 8.3 Mbps as of December 31, 2017.

Net Operating Revenue fromPay-TV Services.

Net operating revenue from residentialPay-TV services increased by 11.2%, primarily as a result of a 6.1% increase in the average number of our residentialPay-TV subscribers to 1.61.59 million duringas of December 31, 2018 from 1.51.50 million duringas of December 31, 2017, and a 1.5% increase in the average net operating revenue per subscriber, principally as a result of the shift in the our sales mix towards more comprehensive packages of channels. As of December 31, 2018, ourPay-TV subscribers represented 19.2% of our total residential fixed lines in service as compared to 16.2% of our total residential fixed lines in service as of December 31, 2017.

Net Operating Revenue from Personal Mobility Services

Net operating revenue from personal mobility servicesPersonal Mobility Services represented 32.9% of our net operating revenue during 2018. Personal mobility services include sales of mobile telephony services to post-paid andpre-paid customers that include voice services and data communication services. Net operating revenue from personal mobility servicesPersonal Mobility Services declined by 5.2%, primarily due to a 4.4% decline in revenue from mobile telephony services.

Net Operating Revenue from Mobile Telephony Services.

Net operating revenue from mobile telephony services declined by 4.4%, primarily due to an 8.8% decline in the number of mobile customers that subscribe to our prepaid plans to 27.3 million duringas of December 31, 2018 from 29.9 million duringas of December 31, 2017, principally as a result of (1) Brazil’s high unemployment rate as our sales net additions of prepaid subscribers is closely correlated to movements in the unemployment rate, (2) the migration of prepaid customers in Brazil to the use of a single SIM card as operators have increased the offer of“all-net” plans following the successive reductions of the MTR tariffs, and (3) our strict disconnection policy for inactive customers, which is designed to reduce fee payments that we must make for each active account.

The effects of these declines were partially offset by (1) a 1.7% increase in average monthly net revenue per user, primarily as a result of an improvement in the profile of our customer base, and (2) a 15.0% increase in the number of mobile customers that subscribe to our postpaid plans to 7.7 million duringas of December 31, 2018 from 6.7 million duringas of December 31, 2017. During 2018, data revenue represented 67.2%71.7% of net operating revenue from mobile telephony services compared to 53.9% during 2017.

Net Operating Revenue from Interconnection to Our Mobile Network.Network

Mobile interconnection revenue declined by 10.4% during 2018, primarily as a result of the reduction in MTR tariffs in February 2017 and February 2018, the effects of which were partially offset by an increase in interconnection traffic.

Net Operating Revenue from Sales of Handsets, SIM Cards and Other Accessories.Accessories

Revenue from handsets, SIM cards and other accessories declined by 15.1% during 2018, primarily as a result of the reduction in sales volume of handsets due to our policy of not subsidizing the sale of this product.

Net Operating Revenue from B2B Services

Net operating revenue from B2B services represented 27.1% of our net operating revenue during 2018. B2B services include corporate solutions offered to our small,medium-sized, large corporate customers, including voice services and corporate data solutions, and wholesale customers. Net operating revenue from B2B services declined by 7.8%, primarily as a result of (1) lower voice traffic, following the natural market trend, (2) the reduction in MTR tariffs and VCfixed-to-mobile tariffs in February 2017 and February 2018, (3) the slowdown in Brazilian economic activity, which has led to efforts by corporate and government customers to reduce costs, including telecommunications services costs, and has led to the downsizing or closing of many of our SME customers, and (4) market perceptions of our company during our RJ Proceedings which made it difficult for us to enter into new agreements with corporate customers.

The total number of our B2B customers increased by 3.3% to 6.7 million duringas of December 31, 2018 from 6.5 million duringas of December 31, 2017, as the 15.3% increase in B2B mobile customers more than offset the 3.5% decline in B2B fixed-line customers.

Operating Expenses

Under the Brazilian Corporate Law, we are required to segregate cost of sales and services from operating expenses in the preparation of our income statement. However, in evaluating and managing our business, we prepare reports in which we review the elements included in cost of sales and services and operating expenses classified by nature, as presented in note 5 of our audited consolidated financial statements. We believe that this classification improves our ability to understand results and trends in our business and that financial analysts and other investors who review our performance rely on this classification in performing their own analysis. Therefore, we have presented the discussion below of our operating expenses based on the classification of operating expenses presented in note 5 of our audited consolidated financial statements.

The following table sets forth the components of our operating expenses, as well as the percentage change from the prior year, for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.

 

  Year Ended December 31,   

Year Ended December 31,

  2018   2017   % Change   

2018

  

2017

  

% Change

  (in millions of reais, except percentages)   (in millions ofreais, except percentages)

Third-party services

  R$5,925   R$6,221    (4.8  R$5,925  R$6,221  (4.8)

Depreciation and amortization

   5,953    5,881    1.2   5,811  5,109  13.7

Rental and insurance

   4,342    4,163    4.3   4,200  4,163  0.9

Personnel

   2,594    2,791    (7.1  2,594  2,791  (7.1)

Network maintenance services

   1,104    1,252    (11.8  1,104  1,252  (11.8)

Interconnection

   658    778    (15.4  658  778  (15.4)

Provision for contingencies

   90    144    (37.4  202  469  (56.9)

Allowance for doubtful accounts

   1,070    692    54.7 

Expected losses on trade receivables

  697  692  0.8

Advertising and publicity

   382    414    (7.6  382  414  (7.6)

Handsets and other costs

   196    223    (12.1  196  223  (12.1)

Impairment losses

       47    (100.0  291  (4,747)  n.m.

Taxes and other expenses

   135    345    (61.0  250  543  (54.0)

Other operating income (expenses), net

   133    1,233    (89.2  (5,016)  (8,243)  (39.1)
  

 

   

 

     

 

  

 

  

Total cost of sales and services

  R$22,582   R$24,184    (6.6  R$27,328  R$26,151  4.5
  

 

   

 

     

 

  

 

  

n.m.

Not meaningful.

Operating expenses declinedincreased by 6.6%4.5% during 2018, principally due to:

to (1) impairment losses of R$292 million recorded in 2018 compared to a 89.2%reversal of impairment losses of R$4,701 million in 2017, and (2) a 13.7%, or R$1,102702 million, increase in depreciation and amortization expense. The effects of these factors were partially offset by a 38.8%, or R$3,180 million, decline in other operating expenses, net;income, net, and to a lesser degree:

 

a 4.8%, or R$297 million, decline in third-party service costs;

 

a 61.0%54.0%, or R$211293 million, decline in taxes and other expenses; and

 

a 7.1%, or R$197 million, decline in personnel expenses.expenses;

The effects of these factors was partially offset by a 54.7%

an 11.8%, or R$378147 million, increasedecline in allowance for doubtful accounts.network maintenance service costs; and

a 15.4%, or R $120 million, decline in interconnection costs.

Third-Party Services

Third-party service costs declined by 4.8% during 2018, primarily as a result of lower selling expenses, information technology expenses and call center expenses as a result of our adoption of our new customer care model and, to a lesser extent the deferral of a portion of our selling expenses as a result of our implementation of ASC 606 for periods ending after January 1, 2018. The effects of these factors waswere partially offset by higher TV content costs as a result of the growth of ourPay-TV customer base and adjustments in contractual terms by some of our content providers, and by increased electricity costs as a result of the applicable electricity tariffs.

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization costs increased by 1.2%13.7% during 2018, primarily as a result of the growth of our data and mobile network due to our strategy of modernization of the core network focusing on transmission and transport infrastructure, which has increased the amount of depreciable property, plant and equipment and amortizable license.

Rental and Insurance

Rental and insurance costs increased by 4.3%0.9% during 2018, primarily as a result of an increase inreais of certain rental expenses denominated in U.S. dollars as a result of the depreciation of therealagainst the U.S. dollar during 2018, particularly expenses relating to our agreements with GlobeNet and our lease of capacity on theSES-6 satellite.

Personnel

Personnel expenses (including employee benefits and social charges and employee and management profit sharing) declined by 7.1% during 2018, primarily as a result of initiatives that that we have implemented to promote greater efficiency and productivity as well as stricter cost controls related in personnel expenses.

Network Maintenance Services

Network maintenance services costs declined by 11.8% during 2018, primarily as a result of a lower number of maintenance incidents as a result of our initiatives focused on preventive actions and productivity improvements, which have been increasing the efficiency of field operations, as well as efficiency gains arising from the digitalization of processes and customer service.

Interconnection

Interconnection costs declined by 15.4% during 2018, primarily as a result of the declines in MTR tariffs and theTU-RL andTU-RIU interconnection tariffs that were implemented in February 2018 and February 2017, the effects of which were partially offset by an increase in interconnection traffic.

Provision for Contingencies

Provision for contingencies declined by 37.4%56.9% during 2018, primarily as a result of our reversal of a portion of our provision for contingencies and the related inflation adjustment due to the reprocessing of the provision estimation model taking into account the new profile and history of discontinuation of lawsuits in the context of the approval and ratification of the RJ Plan.

Allowance for Doubtful AccountsExpected Losses on Trade Receivables

Allowance for doubtful accountsExpected losses on trade receivables increased by 54.7%0.8% during 2018, primarily as a result of our revision of the assumptions that we use in determining our provision for bad debt.expected losses on trade receivables. During 2018, allowance for doubtful accountsexpected losses on trade receivables represented 4.9%3.2% of our net operating revenue compared to 2.9% during 2017.

Advertising and Publicity

Advertising and publicity expenses declined by 7.6% during 2018, primarily as a result of a decline in the volume of our advertising campaigns.

Handsets and Other Costs

Handsets and other costs declined by 12.1% during 2018, primarily due to the lower volume of handset sales.

Impairment Losses

We did not record an impairment losses during 2018 while we recorded impairment losses of R$47292 million during 2018 compared to a reversal of impairment losses of R$4,747 million during 2017. Impairment losses in 2018 consisted of a supplementary adjustment to the recognized allowance for impairment losses related to expected future profitability of assets with finite useful lives. The reversal of impairment losses in 2017 consisted of the partial reversal of impairment losses on goodwill relatingrelated to Africatel, which is reported as aheld-for-sale asset, as a resultthe expected future profitability of our annual impairment testing.assets with finite useful lives, due to the scenarios and financial indicators taken into consideration in the cash flows from the RJ Plan.

Taxes and Other Expenses

Taxes and other expenses declined by 61.0%54.0% during 2018, primarily due to a decrease in other tax expenses, as a result of a decline in other revenues to which other taxes are associated, and a decrease in expenses for fines.

Other Operating Expenses, Net

Other operating expenses, net was R$132 milliondeclined by 38.8% during 2018, and R$1,235 million during 2017, primarily as a result of the effects ofnon-recurring expenses, which occurred during 2017, related to unrecoverable tax,write-off of other assets and other expenses due to reconcile accounting balances as part of the RJ Proceedings.

Reorganization Items, Net

As a result of the RJ Proceedings, we have applied ASC 852 in preparing our consolidated financial statements. ASC 852 requires that financial statements distinguish transactions and events that are directly associated with the reorganization from the ongoing operations of the business. Accordingly, certain expenses, realized gains and losses and provisions for losses that are realized or incurred in the RJ Proceedings have been recorded in as reorganization items, net in our consolidated statements of operations.

Reorganization items, net was a gain of R$31,581 million during 2018, primarily consisting of:

a R$13,929 million adjustment to fair value of loans and financings;

a R$12,881 million gain on our restructuring of our loans and financings, trade payables owing toANATEL-AGU and other trade payables; and

a R$5,577 million adjustment to present value of our trade payables (including trade payables owing toANATEL-AGU).

Reorganization items, net was an expense of R$2,372 million during 2017, primarily consisting of (1) a R$1,569 million increase of the amount recorded relating to our contingent liabilities owed to ANATEL to the amount allowed for these claims in the RJ Proceedings, which was greater than their carrying amount prior to the commencement of the RJ Proceedings, (2) a R$736 million increase of the amount recorded relating to our contingent liabilities to the amount allowed for these claims in the RJ Proceedings, which was greater than their carrying amount prior to the commencement of the RJ Proceedings, (3) inflation adjustment of contingencies of R$410 million, and (4) fees and expenses of R$370 million of professional advisors who are assisting us with the RJ Proceedings. The effects of these expenses were partially offset by our recognition of income from short-term investments of R$713 million, which were recognized as reorganization items.

Operating Income (Loss) before Financial Expenses, Net, and Taxes

As a result of the foregoing, the operating incomeloss before financial expenses, net, and taxes of our Telecommunications in Brazil segment increased by 126.3% to R$5,185 million during 2018 from R$2,291 million during 2017. As a percentage of net operating revenue, the operating loss before financial expenses, net, and taxes of our Telecommunications in Brazil segment was R$31,142 million23.7% during 2018 compared to a consolidated operating loss before financial expenses, net, and taxes of R$2,697 million during 2017. As a percentage of net operating revenue, the operating income before financial expenses, net, and taxes of our Telecommunications in Brazil segment was 142.5% during 2018 compared to operating loss before financial expenses, net, and taxes of 11.4%9.7% during 2017.

Operating expenses of our other operations declined by 6.5% to R$283 million during 2018 from R$303 million during 2017, principally as a result of ourthe disposition of our interest in MTC in January 2017. The operating loss before financial expenses, net, and taxes of our other operations increased by R$13 million to R$83 million during 2018 from R$70 million during 2017. As a percentage of net operating revenue, the operating loss before financial expenses, net, and taxes of our other operations was 41.4% during 2018 compared to 30.0% during 2017.

Our consolidated operating income before financial expenses, net, and taxes was R$31,059 million during 2018 compared to a consolidated operating loss before financial expenses, net, and taxes ofincreased by 123.1% to R$2,7675,268 million during 2018 from R$2,361 million during 2017. As a percentage of net operating revenue, operating incomeloss before financial expenses, net, and taxes was 140.8%23.9% during 2018 compared to operating loss before financial expenses, net, and taxes of 11.6%9.9% during 2017.

Financial Expenses, Net

Financial Income

Financial income declined by 1.7%increased to R$1,52530,950 million during 2018 from R$1,5507,136 million during 2017, primarily due to (1) our recording a 23.0% declineR$11,055 million gain on our restructuring of our third-party borrowings during 2018 as a result of the novation of the debt represented by the Defaulted Bonds, calculated pursuant to the RJ Plan, compared to no gains or losses recorded during 2017, (2) an increase in interest on other assetsadjustment to fair value of third-party borrowings and financing by 127.7% to R$80913,290 million during 2018, principally related to fair value adjustments of our third-party borrowings, from R$1,0504,873 million during 2017, principally related to the revision of the calculations of the provisions for contingencies related to administrative proceedings and lawsuits involving ANATEL, (3) an increase in the reversal of other interest and other income to R$4,080 million during 2018, principally as a result of a declinethe reversal of the interest expenses on debt included in interestthe RJ Plan, adjusted in the period prior to the Brazilian Confirmation Date, of R$3,013 million and monetary variation on judicial deposits dueadjustment of trade payables and default payment to a decline in average amountpresent value of these assets. The effects of this factor was partially offset by (1) our recording R$143877 million, of income on short-term investments during 2018 compared to nil during 2017, and (2) a 14.3% increase in other income to R$572 million during 2018 from R$500 million during 2017.2017, and (4) our recording a R$1,399 million inflation adjustment and foreign exchange difference on the fair value adjustment.

Financial Expenses

Financial expenses increaseddeclined by 75.1%58.0% to R$5,5374,342 million during 2018 from R$3,16210,333 million during 2017, primarily as a result of our incurrence of R$5,046 million of borrowing and finance costs during 2018 as a result of the settlement of many of the claims in our RJ Proceedings related to our debt instruments compared to no borrowing and finance costs during 2017 due to the elimination of our borrowing and financing costs as a result of the commencement of the RJ Proceedings in June 2016, the effects of which were partially offset by a 52.9% decline in other charges to R$1,491 million during 2018 from R$3,162 million during 2017.of:

 

Borrowingour recording of a reversal of interest expenses on borrowings and finance costs during 2018 consisted of (1) inflation and exchange losses on third-party borrowings of R$2,646 million, and (2) interest on borrowingsdebentures payable to third parties of R$1,4001,793 million, primarily as a result of the reversal of interest on debt included in the RJ Plan of R$3,115 million, partially offset by interest expenses on borrowings and debentures payable to third parties of R$1,362 million, during 2018 compared to our recording interest expenses on borrowings and debentures payable to third parties of R$16,4503,594 million of current andnon-current loans and financings on our balance sheet as of December 31, 2018 that had been classified as liabilities subject to compromise as of December 31, 2017 and the 19.8% depreciation of therealagainst the U.S. dollar during the period between the Brazilian Confirmation Date and December 31, 2018.2017;

Other charges declined primarily as a result of:

 

a 51.2%49.9% decline in interest on and inflation adjustment to other liabilities to R$800789 million during 2018 from R$1,6411,554 million during 2017, principally due to the commencement of our participation in the Tax Recovery Program (REFIS) in May 2017;

 

  

our recording of a gain onavailable-for-saleheld-for-sale financial assets of R$293 million during 2018, primarily as a result of (i) the R$829 million exchange gain rate due to the 17.1% depreciation of therealagainst the U.S. dollar during 2018, and (ii) R$142 million recorded with respect to our portion of dividends approved by Unitel related to Unitel’s 2017 fiscal year, the effects of which were partially offset by a R$678 million loss recorded based on our revision of the fair value of the cash investment and the revision of the recoverable amount of dividends receivable from Unitel, compared to a loss onavailable-for-saleheld-for-sale financial assets of R$267 million during 2017, primarily as a result of the loss recorded based on our revision of the recoverable amount of dividends receivable from Unitel, the fair value of the cash investment in Unitel and exchange losses rate related to the depreciation of the Angolan Kwanza against the U.S. dollar and thereal during 2017; and

 

our recording a gain on66.4% decline in reversals of inflation adjustment of provisions for contingencies ofto R$8227 million during 2018 compared to a loss on inflation adjustment of provisions for contingencies offrom R$265675 million, during 2017, primarily as a result of our reversal of a portion of our provision for contingencies and the related inflation adjustment due to the reprocessing of the provision estimation model taking into account the new profile and history of discontinuation of lawsuits in the context of the approval and ratification of the RJ Plan.Plan, during 2017; and

a 14.6% decline in inflation adjustment to and exchange losses on third-party borrowings to R$2,494 million during 2018 from R$2,920 million during 2017, principally as a result of our recording capital gains associated with the novation of debts arising on the Defaulted Bonds of R$555 million during 2018.

The effects of these factors were partially offset by (1) our recording a R$760 million adjustment to fair value to the amortization of deferred gains during 2018 compared to no gains or losses recorded during 2017, and (2) a 70.0%, or R$358 million, increase in tax on financial transactions and bank fees.

Income Tax and Social Contribution

The composite corporate statutory income tax and social contribution rate was 34% in each of the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017. We recorded an income tax and social contribution benefits of R$3473,275 million in 2017during 2018 and an income tax and social contribution expense of R$3511,099 million during 2017. The effective tax rate applicable to our income loss before taxes was (1.3)(15.3)% during 2018 and the effective tax rate applicable to our loss before taxes was 8.0%(19.8)% during 2017. The table below sets forth a reconciliation of the composite corporate statutory income tax and social contribution rate to our effective tax rate for each of the periods presented.

 

   Year Ended December 31,
   2018  2017
Composite corporate statutory income tax and social contribution rate  34.0%  34.0%
Valuation allowance  16.1  (25.9)
Effects of foreign rate differential  0.0  (0.5)
Tax effects ofnon-deductible expenses  2.4  (2.1)
Tax effects oftax-exempt income  (53.8)  8.5
Tax incentives  0.0  0.3
Tax amnesty program  0.0  (6.3)
Other  0.0  0.0
  

 

  

 

Effective rate  (1.3)%  8.0%
  

 

  

 

   

Year Ended December 31,

   

2018

  

2017

Composite corporate statutory income tax and social contribution rate

  34.0%  34.0%

Equity in investees

  0.0  0.0

Tax incentives

  0.0  0.3

Permanent deductions(add-backs)

  (62.3)  2.7

Reversal of (allowance for) impairment losses on deferred tax assets

  12.9  (48.9)

Tax effects of deferred tax assets of foreign subsidiaries

  0.0  (7.8)

Effective rate

  (15.3)%  (19.8)%

The effective tax rate applicable to our income before taxes was (1.3) (15.3)% induring 2018, resulting in a tax benefit despite our generating income before taxes, primarily as a result of tax effects oftax-exempt income,permanent deductions, mostly as a result of the effects of the novation of our debt obligations due to the confirmation of the RJ Plan, which reduced our effective tax rate by 53.8%62.3%. The effects of this factor was partially offset by the tax effects of a valuation allowance for impairment losses on deferred tax assets, which resulted in a decline in our tax assets by R$4,3672,757 million, that were recognized for the companies that as at December 31, 2018, do not expect to generate sufficient future taxable profits against which these tax assets could be offset, which increased our effective tax rate by 16.1%12.9%.

The effective tax rate applicable to our loss before taxes was 8.0% in(19.8)% during 2017, resulting in a tax benefit,expense, primarily as a result of (1) the tax effects of a valuation allowance and valuation allowance,for impairment losses on deferred tax assets, which resulted in a decline in our tax assets by R$1,1352,718 million, that were recognized for the companies that as at December 31, 2017, do not expect to generate sufficient future taxable profits against which these tax assets could be offset, which reduced the effective tax rate applicable to our loss before taxes by 25.9%,48.9% (effectively reducingincreasing our tax benefit)expense), and (2) the tax effects of amnesty programunrecognized deferred tax assets of foreign subsidiaries that are not eligible to recognize tax credits on tax loss carryforwards, which reduced the effective tax rate applicable to our loss before taxes by 6.3% (effectively reducing our tax benefit). The effects which were partially offset by the tax effects of tax exempt income, which increased the effective tax rate applicable to our loss before taxes by 8.5%7.8% (effectively increasing our tax benefit)expense).

Net IncomeProfit (Loss)

As a result of the foregoing, we recorded consolidated net incomeprofit of R$27,39424,616 million during 2018 compared to consolidated neta loss of R$4,0286,656 million during 2017. As a percentage of net operating revenue, our net incomeprofit was 124.2%111.6% during 2018 compared to neta loss of 16.7%28.0% during 2017.

Year Ended December 31, 2017 Compared with Year Ended December 31, 2016

The following table sets forth the components of our consolidated income statement, as well as the percentage change from the prior year, for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.

   Year ended December 31, 
   2017  2016  % Change 
   (in millions of reais, except percentages) 

Net operating revenue

  R$23,790  R$25,996   (8.5

Cost of sales and services

   (15,676  (16,742  (6.4
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Gross profit

   8,114   9,255   (12.2

Operating income (expenses)

    

Selling expenses

   (4,400  (4,383  0.4 

General and administrative expenses

   (3,064  (3,688  (16.9

Other operating income (expenses), net

   (1,043  (1,237  (15.7

Reorganization items, net Other operating income (expenses), net

   (2,732  (9,006  (69.7
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Operating loss before financial expenses, net, and taxes

   (2,767  (9,059  (69.5

Financial expenses, net

   (1,612  (4,375  (63.2
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Loss before taxes

   (4,379  (13,434  (67.4

Income tax and social contribution

   351   (2,245  n.m. 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Net loss

  R$(4,027 R$(15,680  (74.3
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

n.m.

Not meaningful.

Net Operating Revenue

The following table sets forth the components of our net operating revenue, as well as the percentage change from the prior year, for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.

   Year ended December 31, 
   2017   2016   % Change 
   (in millions of reais, except percentages) 

Telecommunications in Brazil Segment:

      

Residential

  R$9,171   R$9,376    (2.2

Personal mobility

   7,645    7,849    (2.6

B2B

   6,486    7,607    (14.7

Other services

   256    332    (23.0
  

 

 

   

 

 

   
   23,557    25,164    (6.4

Other operations(1)

   233    833    (72.1
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

Net operating revenue

  R$23,790   R$25,996    (8.5
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

(1)

Other operations includes the net operating revenue of Africatel.

Net operating revenue of our Telecommunications in Brazil segment declined by 6.4% during 2017, principally due to a 14.7% decline in net operating revenue from B2B services, and to a lesser extent, a 2.2% decline in net operating revenue from residential services, and a 2.6% decline in net operating revenue from personal mobility services. In addition, net operating revenue of our other operations declined by 72.1%, principally as a result of our disposition of our interest in MTC in January 2017.

Net Operating Revenue from Residential Customer Services

Net operating revenue from residential customer services represented 38.5% of our net operating revenue during 2017. Net operating revenue from residential services declined by 2.2%, primarily due to (1) the 3.3% decline in the average number of residential revenue generating units, or RGUs; (2) the decline in voice traffic, and (3) the reduction inTU-RL andTU-RIU fixed line interconnection tariffs and VCfixed-to-mobile tariffs in February 2017. These effects were partially offset by the 3.9% increase in the average monthly net residential revenue per user to R$79.6 in 2017 from R$76.6 in 2016, primarily due to an increase in broadband andPay-TV revenues.

Net Operating Revenue from Residential Fixed-Line Services. Net operating revenue from residential fixed-line services declined by 9.5%, primarily due to a 7.2% decline in the average number of residential fixed lines in service to 9.2 million during 2017 from 9.9 million during 2016, as a result of (1) the general trend in the Brazilian telecommunications industry to substitute mobile services in place of local fixed-line services, and (2) the impact of two rate increases during 2017. The effects of these factors were partially offset by the migration of our fixed-line customer base to convergent service offerings, such asOi Total, and other plans offering unlimited minutes of usage, which generate greater revenue per user.

Net Operating Revenue from Broadband Services. Net operating revenue from residential broadband services increased by 0.9%, primarily as a result of a 1.5% increase in the average net operating revenue per subscriber, primarily as a result of the migration of our broadband base to service offerings with higher speed, which generate greater revenue per user. The effects of this migration were partially offset by a 0.6% decline in the average number of our residential ADSL subscribers. As of December 31, 2017, our ADSL subscribers represented 55.8% of our total residential fixed lines in service and subscribed to plans with an average speed of 8.3 Mbps as compared to 52.2% of our total residential fixed lines in service at an average speed of 6.8 Mbps as of December 31, 2016.

Net Operating Revenue fromPay-TV Services. Net operating revenue from residentialPay-TV services increased by 22.9%, primarily as a result of a 16.0% increase in the average number of our residentialPay-TV subscribers increased to 1.5 million during 2017 from 1.3 million during 2016, and a 5.9% increase in the average net operating revenue per subscriber, principally as a result of the shift in the our sales mix towards more comprehensive packages of channels. As of December 31, 2017, ourPay-TV subscribers represented 16.2% of our total residential fixed lines in service as compared to 13.0% of our total residential fixed lines in service as of December 31, 2016.

Net Operating Revenue from Personal Mobility Services

Net operating revenue from personal mobility services represented 32.1% of our net operating revenue during 2017. Net operating revenue from personal mobility services declined by 2.6%, primarily due to (1) a 20.2% decline in mobile interconnection revenue, and (2) a 1.2% decline in revenue from mobile telephony services.

Net Operating Revenue from Mobile Telephony Services. Net operating revenue from mobile telephony services declined by 1.2%, primarily due to:

a 9.3% decline in the number of mobile customers that subscribe to our prepaid plans to 29.9 million during 2017 from 33.0 million during 2016, principally as a result of (1) an increase in Brazil’s unemployment rate as our sales net additions of prepaid subscribers is closely correlated to movements in the unemployment rate, (2) the migration of prepaid customers in Brazil to the use of a single SIM card as operators have increased the offer of“all-net” plans following the successive reductions of the MTR tariffs, and (3) our strict disconnection policy for inactive customers, which is designed to reduce fee payments that we must make for each active account; and

a 2.1% decline in the number of mobile customers that subscribe to our postpaid plans to 6.7 million during 2017 from 6.9 million during 2016.

The effects of these declines were partially offset by a 7.5% increase in average monthly net revenue per user, primarily as a result of an improvement in the profile of our customer base. During 2017, data revenue represented 53.9% of net operating revenue from mobile telephony services as compared to 47.2% during 2016.

Net Operating Revenue from Interconnection to Our Mobile Network. Mobile interconnection revenue declined by 20.2% in 2017, primarily as a result of the reduction in MTR tariffs in February 2017.

Net Operating Revenue from B2B Services

Net operating revenue from B2B services represented 27.3% of our net operating revenue during 2017. Net operating revenue from B2B services declined by 14.7%, primarily as a result of (1) lower voice traffic, following the natural market trend, (2) the reduction in MTR tariffs and VCfixed-to-mobile tariffs in February 2017, (3) the slowdown in Brazilian economic activity, which has led to efforts by corporate and government customers to reduce costs, including telecommunications services costs, and has led to the downsizing or closing of many of our SME customers, and (4) market perceptions of our company during our RJ proceedings which has made it difficult for us to enter into new agreements with corporate customers.

As a result of these factors, we experienced a 1.6% decline in the total number of B2B customers to 6.5 million during 2017 from 6.6 million during 2016, principally as a result of a 3.2% decline in fixed line customers, partially offset by a 1.1% increase in mobile customers.

Operating Expenses

The following table sets forth the components of our operating expenses, as well as the percentage change from the prior year, for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2017   2016   % Change 
   (in millions of reais, except percentages) 

Third-party services

  R$6,221   R$6,399    (2.8

Depreciation and amortization

   5,881    6,311    (6.8

Rental and insurance

   4,163    4,330    (3.9

Personnel

   2,791    2,852    (2.1

Network maintenance services

   1,252    1,540    (18.7

Interconnection

   778    1,173    (33.7

Contingencies

   144    1,056    (86.4

Allowance for doubtful accounts

   692    643    7.5 

Advertising and publicity

   414    449    (7.9

Handsets and other costs

   223    284    (21.4

Impairment losses

   47    226    (79.4

Taxes and other expenses

   345    559    (38.3

Other operating income (expenses), net

   1,233    227    n.m 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total cost of sales and services

  R$24,184   R$26,049    (7.2
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

n.m.

Not meaningful.

Operating expenses declined by 7.2% in 2017, principally due to:

a 86.4%, or R$912 million, decline in contingencies;

a 6.8%, or R$429 million, decline in depreciation and amortization costs;

a 33.7%, or R$395 million, decline in interconnection costs;

a 18.7%, or R$289 million, decline in network maintenance services; and

a 38.3%, or R$214 million, decline in taxes and other expenses.

The effects of these factors were partially offset by our incurrence of R$1,233 million in other operating expenses, net during 2017 compared to R$227 million during 2016.

Third-Party Services

Third-party service costs declined by 2.8% in 2017, primarily as a result of lower call center expenses as a result of our adoption of our new customer care model and lower legal advisory and consulting services expenses as a result of a reduction of judicial processes. The effects of these factors were partially offset by higher content acquisition costs for ourPay-TV services as a result of the 16.0% increase in the average number of our residentialPay-TV subscribers, an increase in sales commission expenses as a result of an increase in sales of higher value services, and a reduction in energy costs.

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization costs declined by 6.8% in 2017, primarily as a result of the growth of increase in the amount of the property, plant and equipment that has been fully depreciated.

Rental and Insurance

Rental and insurance costs declined by 3.9% in 2017, primarily as a result of (1) an decline inreaisof certain rental expenses denominated in U.S. dollars as a result of the appreciation ofreal against U.S. dollar during 2017, particularly expenses relating to our agreements with GlobeNet and our lease of capacity on theSES-6 satellite, and (2) the absence of expenses during 2017 relating to settlement agreements with other operators we entered into in 2016 related to the leasing of towers and equipment. The effects of these factors was partially offset by (1) increased tower and equipment leasing costs, and (2) increased vehicles leasing costs as a result of our absorption of network maintenance operations.

Personnel

Personnel expenses (including employee benefits and social charges and employee and management profit sharing) declined by 2.1% in 2017, primarily as a result of (1) headcount reductions that we implemented in May 2016 and in the fourth quarter of 2016, and (2) initiatives that that we have implemented to promote greater efficiency and productivity as well as stricter cost controls related in personnel expenses. The effects of these factors were partially offset by (1) the increase in the number of our employees as a result of our absorption of network service operations in the state of Rio de Janeiro and in the South, North and Northeast regions in 2016, (2) increases in the compensation of some of our employees as a result of the renegotiation of some of our collective bargaining agreements at the end of 2016, (3) increased provisions for variable compensation related to the fulfillment of operational, financial and quality goals established for 2017 under some of our collective bargaining agreements, and (4) our implementation of certain strategic projects that have resulted in the insourcing of services that used to be provided by third parties in order to improve quality and productivity in some of our critical processes.

Network Maintenance Services

Network maintenance services costs declined by 18.7% in 2017, primarily as a result of (1) our absorption of network service operations in the state of Rio de Janeiro and in the South, North and Northeast regions in 2016, as a result of which we no longer incur costs to third parties for these services, and our focus on conducting more efficient field operations focused on increased productivity and preventive actions. The effects of this factor were partially offset by our insourcing of technical support call center operations in 2017 and annual readjustments of costs under our contracts.

Interconnection

Interconnection costs declined by 33.7% in 2017, primarily as a result of the declines in MTR tariffs and theTU-RL andTU-RIU interconnection tariffs that were implemented in February 2017 and February 2016. The effects of these factors were partially offset by an increase inoff-net mobile traffic volume as a result of our introduction of new mobile plans based on the“all-net” model.

Contingencies

In 2016, contingencies included R$858 million related to labor contingencies of Rede Conecta – Serviços de Rede S.A., or Rede Conecta (which merged into Serede in November 2018).

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Allowance for doubtful accounts increased by 7.5% in 2017, primarily as a result of an increase in consumer default rates as a result of the deterioration Brazilian macroeconomic conditions. During the year ended December 31, 2017, allowance for doubtful accounts represented 2.9% of our net operating revenue compared to 2.5% in 2016.

Advertising and Publicity

Advertising and publicity expenses declined by 7.9% in 2017, primarily as a result of a decline in the volume of our advertising campaigns.

Handsets and Other Costs

Handsets and other costs declined by 21.4% in 2017, primarily due to the lower volume of handset sales.

Impairment Losses

Impairment losses declined by 79.4% in 2017. Impairment losses in 2017 and 2016 consisted of losses on goodwill relating to Africatel, which is reported as aheld-for-sale asset, as a result of our annual impairment testing.

Taxes and Other Expenses

Taxes and other expenses declined by 38.3% in 2017, primarily due to a decrease in other tax expenses, due to a decrease in other revenues in which other taxes are associated and a decrease in expenses for fines.

Other Operating Expenses, Net

Other operating expenses, net increased to R$1,233 million in 2017 from R$227 million in 2016, primarily as a result of the effects ofnon-recurring expenses related to unrecoverable tax,write-off of other assets and other expenses due to the reconciliation of accounting balances as part of the RJ Proceedings.

Reorganization Items, Net

Reorganization items, net declined by 69.7% to R$2,732 million during 2017 from R$9,006 million during 2016. Reorganization items, net during 2017 consisted of (1) a R$1,569 million increase of the amount recorded relating to our contingent liabilities owed to ANATEL to the amount allowed for these claims in the RJ Proceedings, which was greater than their carrying amount prior to the commencement of the RJ Proceedings, (2) a R$736 million increase of the amount recorded relating to our contingent liabilities to the amount allowed for these claims in the RJ Proceedings, which was greater than their carrying amount prior to the commencement of the RJ Proceedings, (3) inflation adjustment of contingencies of R$410 million, and (4) fees and expenses of R$370 million of professional advisors who are assisting us with the RJ Proceedings. The effects of these expenses were partially offset by our recognition of income from short-term investments of R$713 million, which were recognized as reorganization items.

Reorganization items, net during 2016 consisted of (1) a R$6,604 million increase of the amount recorded relating to our contingent liabilities owed to ANATEL to the amount allowed for these claims in the RJ Proceedings, which was greater than their carrying amount prior to the commencement of the RJ Proceedings, (2) a R$2,350 million increase of the amount recorded relating to our other contingent liabilities to the amount allowed for these claims in the RJ Proceedings, which was greater than their carrying amount prior to the commencement of the RJ Proceedings, and (3) fees and expenses of R$253 million of professional advisors who are assisting us with the RJ Proceedings. The effects of these expenses were partially offset by our recognition of income fromshort-term investments of R$202 million, which were recognized as reorganization items.

Operating Loss before Financial Expenses, Net, and Taxes

As a result of the foregoing, the operating loss before financial expenses, net, and taxes of our Telecommunications in Brazil segment declined by 70.1%, to R$2,697 million during 2017 from R$9,008 million during 2016. As a percentage of net operating revenue, the operating loss before financial expenses, net, and taxes of our Telecommunications in Brazil segment declined to 11.4% during 2017 from 35.8% during 2016.

Operating expenses of our other operations declined by 68.5% to R$303 million during 2017 from R$884 million during 2016, principally as a result of our disposition of our interest in MTC in January 2017. The operating loss before financial expenses, net, and taxes of our other operations increased by 37.5%, to R$70 million during 2017 from R$51 million during 2016. As a percentage of net operating revenue, the operating loss before financial expenses, net, and taxes of our other operations increased to 30.0% during 2017 from 6.1% during 2016.

Our consolidated operating loss before financial expenses, net, and taxes declined by 69.5%, to R$2,767 million during 2017 from R$9,059 million during 2016. As a percentage of net operating revenue, operating loss before financial expenses, net, and taxes declined to 11.6% during 2017 from 34.8% during 2016.

Financial Expenses, Net

Financial Income

Financial income increased by 32.4% to R$1,550 million during 2017 from R$1,171 million during 2016, primarily due to (1) a 70.7% increase in interest on other assets to R$1,050 million during 2017 from R$615 million during 2016, principally as a result of interest on judicial deposits and monetary variation on others assets and (2) our recording no gain on exchange rate differences on translating foreign short-term investments during 2017, as part of the recognition as reorganization items, net compared to a R$135 million loss during 2016. The effects of these factors was partially offset by (1) our recording no income from short-term investments during 2017, as part of the recognition as reorganization items, net compared to income of R$112 million during 2016, and (2) a 13.5% decline in other income to R$500 million during 2017 from R$578 million during 2016.

Financial Expenses

Financial expenses declined by 43.0% to R$3,162 million during 2017 from R$5,546 million during 2016, primarily due to the elimination of our borrowing and financing costs in 2017 as a result of the commencement of the RJ Proceedings in June 2016, compared to our borrowing and financing costs of R$2,746 million during 2016, the effects of which were partially offset by a 12.9% increase in other charges to R$3,162 million during 2017 from R$2,800 million during 2016.

Other charges increased primarily as a result of (1) a 174.3% increase in interest on other liabilities to R$1,641 million during 2017 from R$598 million during 2016, principally due to the commencement of our participation in the Tax Recovery Program (REFIS) in May 2017, and (2) a 158.6% increase in other expenses to R$450 million during 2017 from R$174 million during 2016. The effects of these factors was partially offset by (1) a 75.5% decline in loss on available for sale financial assets to R$267 million during 2017 from R$1,090 million during 2016, principally as a result of the reduction of the loss recorded based on our revision of the recoverable amount of dividends receivable from Unitel, the fair value of the cash investment in Unitel and exchange losses rate related to the depreciation of the Angolan Kwanza against the U.S. dollar and thereal to US$39 million during 2017 from US$242 million during 2016, and (2) a 24.6% decline in tax on financial transactions and bank fees to R$512 million during 2017 from R$679 million during 2016, principally due to a reduction in these types of expenses as a result of the RJ Proceedings.

Income Tax and Social Contribution

The composite corporate statutory income tax and social contribution rate was 34% in each of 2017 and 2016. We recorded an income tax and social contribution benefits of R$351 million during 2017 and an income tax and social contribution expenses of R$2,245 million during 2016. The effective tax rate applicable to our loss before taxes was 8.0% during 2017 and (16.7)% during 2016. The table below sets forth a reconciliation of the composite corporate statutory income tax and social contribution rate to our effective tax rate for each of the periods presented.

   Year Ended
December 31,
 
   2017  2016 

Composite corporate statutory income tax and social contribution rate

   34.0%   34.0% 

Valuation allowance

   (25.9  (30.1

Effects of foreign rate differential

   (0.5  (0.1

Tax effects ofnon-deductible expenses

   (2.1  (21.5

Tax effects oftax-exempt income

   8.5   0.9 

Tax incentives

   0.3   0.2 

Tax amnesty program

   (6.3   

Other

   0.0   0.0 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Effective rate

   8.0%   (16.7)% 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The effective tax rate applicable to our loss before taxes was 8.0% in 2017, resulting in a tax benefit, primarily as a result of (1) the tax effects of valuation allowance and valuation allowance, which resulted in a decline in our tax assets by R$1,135 million, that were recognized for the companies that as at December 31, 2017, do not expect to generate sufficient future taxable profits against which these tax assets could be offset, which reduced the effective tax rate applicable to our loss before taxes by 25.9%, (effectively reducing our tax benefit) and (2) the tax effects of amnesty program which reduced the effective tax rate applicable to our loss before taxes by 6.3% (effectively reducing our tax benefit). The effects which were partially offset by the tax effects of tax exempt income, which increased the effective tax rate applicable to our loss before taxes by 8.5% (effectively increasing our tax benefit).

The effective tax rate applicable to our loss before taxes was (16.7)% in 2016, resulting in a tax expense despite our incurring a loss before taxes, primarily as a result of (1) the tax effects of valuation allowance, which resulted in a decline in our tax assets by R$4,050 million that were recognized for the companies that, as at December 31, 2016, do not expect to generate sufficient future taxable profits against which these tax assets could be offset, which reduced the effective tax rate applicable to our loss before taxes by 30.1% (effectively increasing our tax expense), and (2) the tax effects ofnon-deductible expenses, primarily as a result of the effects of the adjustments of debt obligations due to the filing of the judicial reorganization petitions and based on the RJ Plan, which reduced the effective tax rate applicable to our loss before taxes by 21.5% (effectively increasing our tax expense).

Net Loss

As a result of the foregoing, our consolidated net loss declined by 74.3% to R$4,027 million during 2017 from R$15,680 million during 2016. As a percentage of net operating revenue, our net loss declined to 16.9% during 2017 from 60.3% during 2016.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our principal cash requirements have historically consisted of the following:

 

working capital requirements;

 

servicing of our indebtedness;

 

capital expenditures related to investments in operations, expansion of our networks and enhancements of the technical capabilities and capacity of our networks; and

 

dividends on our shares, including in the form of interest attributable to shareholders’ equity.

As a result of the commencement of the RJ Proceedings in June 2016, we ceased to pay principal and interest on our loans and financings subsequent to the date of the commencement of the RJ Proceedings. By operation of the RJ Plan and the Brazilian Confirmation Order, provided that the Brazilian Confirmation Order is not overturned or altered as a result of the pending appeals filed against it, our loans and financings were novated and discharged under Brazilian law and creditors under our loans and financings are entitled only to receive the recoveries set forth in the RJ Plan as recoveries for their claims in accordance with the terms and conditions of the RJ Plan.

Under ourby-laws, unless our board of directors deems it inconsistent with our financial position, payment of dividends is mandatory. Notwithstanding the requirements of ourby-laws, under Section 10.1 of the RJ Plan, weOi and the other RJ Debtors are prohibited from declaring or paying dividends, interest on shareholders’ equity or other forms of return on capital or making any other payment or distribution on or related to their shares (including any payment related to a merger or consolidation) until the sixth anniversary of the date of the Judicial Ratification of the RJ Plan.Brazilian Confirmation Date. After the sixth anniversary of the date of the Judicial Ratification of the RJ Plan,Brazilian Confirmation Date, Oi and the other RJ Debtors will be permitted to declare or pay dividends, interest on shareholders’ equity or other forms of return on capital or make any other payment or distribution on or related to their shares (including any payment related to a merger or consolidation) if Oi meets a certain financialthe ratio of Oi’s consolidated net debt (defined as described under “Item 8. Financial Information—Dividends and Dividend Policy.” There shall not be any restriction to the distribution of dividends underCredits, minus Cash Balance (in each case as defined in the RJ Plan after the full payment of the Financial CreditsPlan)) to EBITDA (as defined in the RJ Plan). for the fiscal year ended immediately prior to any such declaration or payment is less than or equal to 2 to 1. The restrictions of the payment of dividends and other distributions described in this paragraph are subject to certain exceptions, as described under “Item 8. Financial Information—Dividends and Dividend Policy.”

The restrictions of the payment of dividends and other distributions described above are subject to the following exceptions:

dividends, return on capital or other distributions made between the RJ Debtors;

payments by Oi and the other RJ Debtors to dissenting shareholders, according to applicable law, carried out after the Brazilian Confirmation Date; and

any payment of dividends made in accordance with the RJ Plan.

There shall not be any restriction to the distribution of dividends under the RJ Plan after the full payment of the Financial Credits.

Pursuant to Section 10.2.1 of the RJ Plan, if at any time any two of Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s and Fitch rate Oi as investment grade and no default occurs, the restrictions on distributions imposed by Section 10.1 of the RJ Plan will be suspended. However, if one of these rating agencies, or both of them, subsequently cancels or downgrades Oi’s rating, then the suspended restrictions will be reinstated.

Our principal sources of liquidity have traditionally consisted of the following:

 

cash flows from operating activities;

 

short-term and long-term loans; and

 

sales of debt securities in domestic and international capital markets.

As a result of the commencement of our RJ Proceedings in June 2016, our access to short-term and long-term loans and our ability to sell debt securities in domestic and international capital markets has beenwas substantially curtailed. However, in February 2020, we returned to the domestic capital markets with the subscription of an aggregate amount of R$2,500 million of Oi Mobile’snon-convertible debentures.

DuringOur operations generated cash flows during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 and 2016, our operations generated cash flows of R$2,312 million, R$2,863 million and R$4,402 million, and R$3,100 million, respectively. We used R$6,224 million of our cash to repay loans and financings in 2016 prior to the commencement of the RJ Proceedings. In addition, ourOur capital expenditures during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 and 2016 were R$7,426 million, R$5,246 million R$4,344 million and R$3,2644,344 million, respectively. We believe that our continued program of capital expenditures is necessary in order for us to operate in the competitive environment for telecommunications services in Brazil. As our cash flow generated from our operations has not been sufficient to meet the demands of our investing and financing activities, our balances of cash and cash equivalents have declined as of December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016.2017.

As of December 31, 2018,2019, our consolidated cash and cash equivalents and cash investments amounted to R$4,6242,266 million. As of December 31, 2018,2019, we had working capital (consisting of current assets less current liabilities, excluding assetsheld-for-sale and liabilities ofassets-held-for-sale) of R$6,6772,261 million.

Subsequent to December 31, 2019, we generated cash flows from investing activities through the sale on January 24, 2020 by Africatel of all of its shares in PT Ventures for an aggregate purchase price of US$1 billion and we generated cash flows from financing activities through the subscription in February 2020 of an aggregate amount of R$2,500 million of Oi Mobile’snon-convertible debentures.

We anticipate that we will be required to spend approximately R$4,4617,358 million to meet our long-term contractual obligations and commitments induring the years ending December 31, 2020 and 2021. We expect to use proceeds from our sale ofnon-core assets, including the sale of PT Ventures and the sale of our property in Botafogo, proceeds from borrowings from Brazilian and international financial institutions under new export credit facilities, proceeds from Oi Mobile’s sale of itsnon-convertible debentures, together with our operating cash flows from operating activities and our cash and cash equivalents and short-term cash investments to fund our capital expenditures and debt service obligations.expenditures.

The RJ Plan permits us to seek to raise up to R$2.5 billion in the capital markets and seek to borrow up to R$2 billion under new export credit facilities. In the absence of funds obtained in the capital markets or under new credit export facilities and from additionalnon-core asset sales, we may have insufficient funds to implement our capital expenditure program and modernize our infrastructure, which could result in a significant deterioration of our ability to generate cash flows from operating activities.

OurWe have prepared our audited consolidated financial statements have been prepared assumingunder the assumption that we will continue as a going concern.concern and in compliance with the legal requirements applicable to a judicial reorganization. See”— Financial Presentation and Accounting Policies— Presentation of Financial Statements.” Our management’s assessmentcompany has been successfully discharging the obligations set forth in the RJ Proceedings and even though there are no indications in this regard, we emphasize that these conditions and circumstances indicate, by their own nature, uncertainties that may affect the success of the RJ Proceedings and possibly cast doubts as to our ability to continue as a going concern is discussed in note 2 to our audited consolidated financial statements. concern.

As a result the completion on January 25, 2019 of the capital increase that was mandated by the RJ Plan through the issuance of 3,225,806,451 Common Shares for an aggregate subscription price of R$4,000 million in our preemptive offering, our management believes that as of the date of this annual report, we have sufficient resourcesnot been able to continuequantify any material impacts related to operate forCOVID-19 and it is too soon to accurately determine the 12 months followingextent of its medium- and long-term impacts on the global and Brazilian economic scenarios. However, as it is not possible yet to predict the duration and effects of this crisis, there is a risk of material impacts on our operations and sales, particularly our FTTH network expansion. For more details see “—Principal Factors Affecting Our Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Potential Effects of theCOVID-19 Pandemic.”

Additionally, our debt instruments with BNDES contain financial covenants that require Oi to maintain five specified financial ratios, measured on a quarterly basis. Under these debt instruments, BNDES has the right to accelerate the debt if, at the date the financial covenants are tested, we are not in compliance with any two of this annual report.these ratios. At December 31, 2019, we were in compliance with these financial covenants.

As a result of the depreciation of thereal subsequent to December 31, 2019, partially due to theCOVID-19 pandemic and the public health measures adopted to combat the pandemic in Brazil and internationally, and the related effects on our U.S. dollar-denominated indebtedness and interest expenses, we believed that it was probable that as of March 31, 2020, we would not be in compliance with more than one of these financial ratios. In anticipation of these ratio breaches, on March 30, 2020 we obtained a waiver from BNDES.

Cash Flow

The following table sets forth certain information about our consolidated cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016.2017.

 

  Year ended December 31,   Year ended December 31, 
  2018 2017 2016   2019 2018 2017 
  (in millions ofreais)   (in millions ofreais) 

Net cash generated (used) in operating activities

  R$2,863  R$4,402  R$3,100   R$2,312  R$2,863  R$4,402 

Net cash (used) generated in investing activities

   (4,917 (4,422 (3,917   (6,851 (4,917 (4,422

Net cash (used) generated in financing activities

   (424 (692 (6,119   2,236  (424 (692

Foreign exchange differences on cash equivalents

   1  11  (398     1  11 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents

   (2,477 (701 (7,335   (2,303 (2,477 (701
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year

   6,863  7,563  14,898    4,385  6,863  7,563 
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year

  R$4,385  R$6,863  R$7,563   R$2,082  R$4,385  R$6,863 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Our primary source of operating funds has historically been cash flow generated from our operations and we have financed our investments in property, plant and equipment through the use of bank loans, vendor financing, capital markets and other forms of financing. Our access to new funds to finance our investments in property, plant and equipment in the form of bank loans, vendor financing, capital markets and other forms of financing has beenwas substantially eliminatedcurtailed following the commencement of our RJ proceedingsProceedings in June 2016. During 2016,However, in February 2020, we used a substantial portion of our cash and cash equivalents to pay indebtedness as it matured priorreturned to the commencementdomestic capital markets with the subscription of our RJ proceedings.an aggregate amount of R$2,500 million of Oi Mobile’snon-convertible debentures. As our cash flow generated from our operations hasoperating activities was not been sufficient to meet the demands of our investing and financing activities during 2017 and 2018, our balances of cash and cash equivalents have declined as of December 31, 2016, 20172018 and 2018.2017. As our cash flow generated from our operating and financing activities were not sufficient to meet the demands of our investing activities, our balances of cash and cash equivalents declined as of December 31, 2019.

2018 Cash Flows for the Year Ended December 31, 2019

Cash Flows Provided by Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities was R$2,312 million during the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to loss before taxes of R$9,087 million, primarily as a result of (1) the effects of our incurrence ofnon-cash depreciation and amortization expenses of R$6,874 million, (2) the effects of our incurrence of losses onnon-cash charges, interest income, inflation adjustments and exchange differences of R$3,607 million, (3) the effects of our incurrence ofnon-cash impairment losses of R$2,111 million, (4) the effects of our incurrence ofnon-cash inflation adjustments to provisions of R$1,620 million, (5) the effects of an increase of R$1,322 million of other taxes on our balance sheet, (6) the effects of our incurrence ofnon-cash onerous obligations of R$1,231 million, and (7) the effects of our incurrence ofnon-cash present value adjustments to other liabilities of R$1,018 million. The effects of these factors were partially offset by the effects of our incurrence ofnon-cash tax recoveries of R$3,618 million.

Cash Flows Used in Investing Activities

Net cash used by investing activities was R$6,851 million during the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily consisting of investments of R$7,426 million in purchases of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets, primarily related to the expansion of our data communications network and IT capacity to increase the quality and capacity of our network in order to promote more efficient operational performance and improvements in service quality and customer experience, the effects of which were partially offset by (1) our realizing net redemption of judicial deposits of R$242 million, (2) our receipt of dividends of R$227 million from Unitel, and (3) our receipt of proceeds from the sale of investments, tangibles and intangibles of R$106 million, primarily related to a R$67 million gain on our sale of our interest in CVTelecom in May 2019.

Cash Flows Provided by Financing Activities

Financing activities provided net cash of R$2,236 million during the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily consisting of the R$4,000 million proceeds of our issuance and sale of 3,225,806,451 Common Shares, the effects of which were partially offset by our incurrence of R$1,611 million of lease financing costs.

Cash Flows for the Year Ended December 31, 2018

Cash Flows Provided by Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities was R$2,863 million during the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to net incomeprofit before taxes of R$27,39421,341 million, during 2018, primarily as a result of (1) the effects of our incurrence ofnon-cash adjustment to fair value of our borrowings and financings of R$13,929 million, (2) the effects of our incurrence ofnon-cash gain on restructuring of third-party borrowings of R$11,055, (3) the effects of our incurrence ofnon-cash gains from reorganization items, neton charges, interest income, inflation adjustments and exchange differences of R$31,5812,043 million, during 2018, primarily consisting of (1) adjustment to fair valueand (4) the effects of our loans and financingsincurrence ofnon-cash present value adjustments to other liabilities of R$13,929 million, (2) a gain on our restructuring of our loans and financings, trade payables owing toANATEL-AGU and other trade payables of R$12,881, and (3) the adjustment to present value of our trade payables (including trade payables owing toANATEL-AGU) of R$5,5771,167 million.

The effects of this factorthese factors were partially offset by (1) the effects of our incurrence ofnon-cash depreciation and amortization expenses of R$5,9535,811 million, during 2018,and (2) our incurrence ofnon-cash losses on financial instruments of R$3,415 million during 2018, primarily as a result of our recording R$16,450 million of current andnon-current loans and financings on our balance sheet as of the Brazilian Confirmation Date that had been classified as liabilities subject to compromise as of December 31, 2017 and the 19.8% depreciation of therealagainst the U.S. dollar during the period between the Brazilian Confirmation Date and December 31, 2018, and (3) the effects of our incurrence ofnon-cash provisions for bad debtlosses on onerous obligations of R$1,224 million during 2018, primarily as a result of our revision of the assumptions that we use in determining our provision for bad debt.4,884 million.

Cash Flows fromUsed in Investing Activities

Net cash used by investing activities was R$4,917 million during the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily consisting of investments of R$5,246 million in purchases of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets, primarily related to the expansion of our data communications network and IT capacity to increase the quality and capacity of our network in order to promote more efficient operational performance and improvements in service quality and customer experience.

Cash Flows fromUsed in Financing Activities

Financing activities used net cash of R$424 million during the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily consisting of cash used (1) to make installment payments under our tax refinancing plan in the aggregate amount of R$265 million, and (2) to repay principal of R$162 million related to the mediation of payments of our borrowings and financing as a result of the RJ Proceedings, and (2) to make installment payments under our tax refinancing plan in the aggregate amount of R$265 million.Proceedings.

2017 Cash Flows for the Year Ended December 31, 2017

Cash Flows fromProvided by Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities was R$4,402 million during the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to net loss before taxes of R$4,0285,558 million, during 2017, primarily as a result of:

of (1) the effects of our incurrence of non-cash provisions for contingencies of R$7,362 million, (2) the effects of our incurrence ofnon-cash losses on charges, interest income, inflation adjustments and exchange differences of R$5,120 million, and (3) the effects of our incurrence ofnon-cash depreciation and amortization expenses of R$5,881 million during 2017; and5,109 million.

The effects of these factors were partially offset by (1) the effects of our incurrence ofnon-cash provision for reorganization items, netpresent value adjustments to other liabilities of R$2,3714,873 million, during 2017, primarily as a resultand (2) the effects of (1) a R$1,569 million increaseour incurrence of the amount recorded relating to our contingent liabilities owed to ANATEL to the amount allowed for these claims in the RJ Proceedings, which was greater than their carrying amount prior to the commencementnon-cash reversals of the RJ Proceedings (2) a R$1,146 million increase of the amount recorded relating to our contingent liabilities to the amount allowed for these claims in the RJ Proceedings, which was greater than their carrying amount prior to the commencement of the RJ Proceedings, and (3) fees and expensesimpairment losses of R$370 million of professional advisors who are assisting us with the RJ Proceedings.4,747 million.

Cash Flows fromUsed in Investing Activities

Net cash used by investing activities was R$4,422 million during the year ended December 31, 2017. During 2017, investing activities which used cash primarily consisted of investments of R$4,344 million in purchases of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets, primarily related to the expansion of our data communications network and IT capacity to increase the quality and capacity of our network in order to promote more efficient operational performance and improvements in service quality and customer experience.

Cash Flows fromUsed in Financing Activities

Financing activities used net cash of R$692 million during the year ended December 31, 2017. During 2017, we used cash principally (1) to purchase shares the remaining 50% of the shares of Rio Alto that we did not own for R$300 million, (2) to make installment payments under the tax refinancing plan in the aggregate amount of R$227 million, and (3) to make installment payments relating to our permits and concessions in the aggregate amount of R$104 million.

2016 Cash Flows

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities was R$3,100 million during 2016 compared to net loss of R$15,680 million during 2016, primarily as a result of:

the effects of our incurrence ofnon-cash provision for reorganization items, net of R$9,006 million during 2016, primarily as a result of (1) a R$6,600 million increase of the amount recorded relating to our contingent liabilities owed to ANATEL to the amount allowed for these claims in the RJ Proceedings, which was greater than their carrying amount prior to the commencement of the RJ Proceedings, (2) a R$2,350 million increase of the amount recorded relating to our contingent liabilities to the amount allowed for these claims in the RJ Proceedings, which was greater than their carrying amount prior to the commencement of the RJ Proceedings, and (2) fees and expenses of R$253 million of professional advisors who are assisting us with the RJ Proceedings;

the effects of our incurrence ofnon-cash provision for contingencies of R$1,056 million, primarily as a result of an increase of the amount recorded relating to our other contingent liabilities;

the effects of our incurrence ofnon-cash depreciation and amortization expenses of R$6,311 million during 2016;

the effects of our incurrence ofnon-cash deferred income tax expenses of R$1,532 million during 2016, primarily as a result of valuation allowance of deferred taxes, net of the increase in deferred tax recognized; and

the effects of our incurrence ofnon-cash losses on derivative financial instruments of R$5,150 million during 2016 prior to our reversal of our derivative financial instruments during the second and third quarters of 2016, primarily as a result of the 17.8% appreciation of therealagainst the U.S. dollar and the 16.7% appreciation of therealagainst the Euro during the first half of 2016.

The effects of these factors were partially offset by the effects of our incurrence ofnon-cash gains on financial instruments of R$5,343 million during 2016, primarily as a result of the 17.8% appreciation of therealagainst the U.S. dollar and the 16.7% appreciation of therealagainst the Euro during the first half of 2016.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

During 2016, investing activities of our continuing operations which used cash primarily consisted of (1) investments of R$3,264 million in purchases of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets, primarily related to the expansion of our data communications network and IT capacity to increase the quality and capacity of our network in order to promote more efficient operational performance and improvements in service quality and customer experience, and (2) net judicial deposits (consisting of deposits less redemptions) of R$660 million, primarily related to provisions for labor, taxes and civil contingencies.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

During 2016, we used cash principally (1) to repay R$5,845 million principal amount of our outstanding loans and financings, net of derivatives financial instruments, consisting primarily of (i) a revolving credit facility in the aggregate amount of US$700 million, (ii) the PTIF 5.625% Notes due 2016 in the aggregate amount of €532 million, (iii) an export credit facility guaranteed by EKN in the aggregate amount of US$62 million (iv) an export credit facility with China Development Bank in the aggregate amount of US$27 million, (v) the 1st and 2nd Series of the 9th Issuance of Debentures and the 2nd Series of the 5th Issuance of Debentures in an aggregate amount of R$59 million (vi) an aggregate of R$290 million under credit facilities with BNDES, (2) to make installment payments relating to our permits and concessions in the aggregate amount of R$205 million, and (3) to make installment payments under the tax refinancing plan in the aggregate amount of R$94 million.

Contractual Commitments

The following table summarizes our significant contractual obligations and commitments as of December 31, 2018:2019:

 

   Payments Due by Period 
   Less than
One Year
   One to
Three
Years
   Three to
Five
Years
   More than
Five Years
   Total 
   (in millions ofreais) 

Loans and financings(1)

  R$961   R$2,340   R$4,405   R$39,631   R$47,337 

Pension plan payables(2)

           402    803    1,205 

Other payables(3)

   582    1,591    8    20,052    21,927 

Unconditional purchase obligations(4)

   1,634    343            1,977 

Concession fees(5)

   172    187    210    496    1,065 

Usage rights(6)

   86                 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  R$3,435   R$4,461   R$5,025   R$60,982   R$73,903 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   Payments Due by Period 
   Less than
One Year
   One to
Three Years
   Three to
Five Years
   More than
Five Years
   Total 
   (in millions ofreais) 

Borrowings and financings(1)

   R$679    R$3,312    R$11,317    R$27,113    R$42,421 

Lease liabilities

   1,510    4,224    2,474    7,275    15,483 

Pension plan payables(2)

       201    402    603    1,206 

Other payables(2)

   442    885    137    11,711    13,175 

Unconditional purchase obligations(3)

   1,433                1,433 

Concession fees(4)

       397    235    261    893 

Usage rights(5)

   59                59 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   R$4,123    R$9,019    R$14,565    R$46,963    R$74,670 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(1)

Includes estimated future payments of interest on our loansborrowings and financings, calculated based on interest rates and foreign exchange rates applicable at December 31, 20182019 and assuming that all amortization payments and payments at maturity on our loansborrowings and financings will be made on their scheduled payment dates and that we elect to pay cash interest for all applicable periods under the PIK Toggle Notes.

(2)

Cash flow estimated in connection with the RJ Plan.

(3)

Cash flow estimated in connection with the RJ Plan. Includes the reimbursement to us of judicial deposit amounts in excess of the amount paid to the prepetition creditors.

(4)

Consists of (1) obligations in connection with a business process outsourcing agreement, and (2) purchase obligations for network equipment pursuant to binding obligations which include all significant terms, including fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum or variable price provisions; and the approximate timing of the transaction.

(5)(4)

Consists of estimatedbi-annual fees due to ANATEL under our concession agreements expiring in 2025. These estimated amounts are calculated based on our results for the year ended December 31, 2018.2019.

(6)(5)

Consists of payments due to ANATEL for radio frequency licenses. Includes accrued and unpaid interest as of December 31, 2018.2019.

We are also subject to contingencies with respect to tax, civil, labor and other claims and have made provisions for accrued liability for legal proceedings related to certain tax, civil, labor and other claims of R$5,0395,252 million as of December 31, 2018.2019. See “Item 8. Financial Information—Legal Proceedings” and note 1924 to our audited consolidated financial statements included in this annual report.

Indebtedness

On a consolidated basis as of December 31, 2018,2019, our U.S. dollar-denominated indebtedness was R$8,6189,210 million, ourreal-denominated indebtedness was R$7,6338,705 million, and our Euro-denominated indebtedness was R$199311 million, in each case after giving effect to the fair value adjustment of our indebtedness. As of December 31, 2018,2019, our U.S. dollar-denominated indebtedness bore interest at an average rate of 5.5%5.4% per annum, ourreal-denominated indebtedness bore interest at an average rate of 6.3%5.2% per annum, and our Euro-denominated indebtedness does not bear interest. As of December 31, 2018, 46.0%2019, 52.0% of our indebtedness, after giving effect to the fair value adjustment of our indebtedness, debt bore interest at floating rates.

Short-Term Indebtedness

As of December 31, 2018,2019, our short-term debt, consisting of the current portion of long-term borrowings and financings, was R$673326 million, after giving effect to the fair value adjustment of our indebtedness. Under our financing policy, we generally do not incur short-term indebtedness, as we believe that our cash flows from operations generally will be sufficient to service our current liabilities.indebtedness.

Long-Term Indebtedness

Our principal long-term borrowings and financings are:

 

fixed-rate notes issued in the international market;

 

debentures issued in the Brazilian market;

 

credit facilities with international export credit agencies;

 

credit facilities with BNDES; and

 

unsecured lines of credit with Brazilian and international financial institutions; and

 

default recoveries owed to holders of some of our novated debt obligations.

Our debt instruments with BNDES require that Oi complies with financial covenants relating to the maintenance of the following ratios on a quarterly basis:

our ratio of shareholders’ equity to total assets;

our ratio of EBITDA to interest paid on our indebtedness;

our ratio of EBITDA (less taxes) to amortization and interest expense (less short-termyear-end cash);

our ratio of total debt to EBITDA; and

our ratio of short-term debt minus cash to EBITDA.

Under these debt instruments, BNDES has the right to accelerate the debt if, at the date the financial covenants are tested, we are not in compliance with any two of these ratios. At December 31, 2019, we were in compliance with these financial covenants.

As a result of the depreciation of thereal subsequent to December 31, 2019, partially due to theCOVID-19 pandemic and the public health measures adopted to combat the pandemic in Brazil and internationally, and the related effects on our U.S. dollar-denominated indebtedness and interest expenses, we believed that it was probable that as of March 31, 2020, we would not be in compliance with more than one ratio. In anticipation of these ratio breaches, on March 30, 2020 we obtained a waiver from BNDES with respect to the failure to comply with more than one of these ratios as of March 31, 2020.

The cross-default or cross-acceleration clauses instruments governing our other indebtedness (other than Oi Mobile’snon-convertible debentures) provide that an event of default under our debt instruments with BNDES do not trigger an event of default under our other indebtedness or enable the creditors under other indebtedness to accelerate that indebtedness.

At December 31, 2019, all of our debt instruments with BNDES were secured by pledges of certain of our accounts receivable.

Some of our debt instruments require that Oi or Telemar comply with financial covenants on a quarterly basis. As of December 31, 2018,2019, we were in compliance with these financial covenants.

The table below sets forth our long-term loansborrowings and financings as of December 31, 2018.2019.

 

   Outstanding
Amount
  

Final
Maturity

   (in millions
of
reais)
   

PIK Toggle Notes

   R$7,0686,981  July 2025

Oi 12th issuance of debentures

   4,3584,565  February 2035

Telemar 6th6th issuance of debentures

   2,4302,546  February 2035

Restructured Export Credit Agreements(1)Agreements(1)

   6,3536,726  February 2035

Restructured BNDES credit agreements

   3,6163,947  February 2033

Restructured Brazilian credit agreements and CRIs

   1,8522,029  February 2035

Non-Qualified Credit Agreement

   326360  February 2030

Local currency financial institution

   5442  December 2033November 2026

Default Recovery inReais

   207  February 2042

Default Recovery in foreign currency

   

Default Recovery in Foreign Currency

4,1254,239  February 2042
  

 

 

  

Total gross loansborrowings and financing

   30,39131,642  

Incurred debt issuance costs

   (1214 

Fair value adjustment

   (13,92913,401 

Short-term portion

   (673326 
  

 

 

  

Long-term indebtedness

   R$15,77717,900  
  

 

 

  

 

(1)

Represents four Restructured Export Credit Agreements.

The following discussion briefly describes certain of our significant outstanding indebtedness.

PIK Toggle Notes

The PIK Toggle Notes are senior unsecured obligations of Oi denominated in U.S. dollars that mature in July 2025, with the principal amount to be fully paid at maturity. The PIK Toggle Notes are guaranteed, jointly and severally, by each of Telemar, Oi Mobile, Oi Coop and PTIF. The PIK Toggle Notes accrued interestsand will accrue interest from February 5, 2018 until FebruaryAugust 5, 2019, the first interest payment date,2020 at a fixed rate of 10.0% per annum, payable in cash. Interest on the NewPIK Toggle Notes will accrue:thereafter accrue as follows:

 

from FebruaryAugust 5, 20192020 until August 5, 2021, at either (at the sole discretion of Oi): (1) a fixed rate of 10.0% per annum payable in cash on a semi-annual basis, or (2) a fixed rate of 12.0% per annum, of which 8.0% shall be payable in cash and 4.0% shall be payable by either increasing the principal amount of the outstanding NewPIK Toggle Notes or by issuingpaid-in-kind notes, at the sole discretion of Oi, in each case, on a semi-annual basis; and

 

thereafter, at a fixed rate of 10.0% per annum payable in cash on a semi-annual basis.

Oi 12th Issuance of Debentures

Oi has issued its 12th issuance of simple, unsecured,non-convertible debentures. These debentures are denominated inreais. reais. The principal amount of these debentures will be paid in 24 semi-annual installments beginning in August 2023, in the amount of 2.0% of the outstanding principal for the first 10 semi-annual installments, 5.7% of the outstanding principal for the next13 semi-annual installments and the remainder at maturity in February 2035. The principal amount of these debentures will accrue interest at the rate of 80% of the CDI rate. Interest will be capitalized to increase the principal balance under these debentures on an annual basis until February 2023, and will be paid semi-annually in cash from August 2023 through the final maturity. Oi’s obligations under these debentures are guaranteed, jointly and severally, by each of Telemar, Oi Mobile, Oi Coop and PTIF.

Telemar 6th Issuance of Debentures

Telemar has issued its 6th issuance, simple, unsecured,non-convertible debentures. These debentures are denominated inreais. The principal amount of these debentures will be paid in24 semi-annual installments beginning in August 2023, in the amount of 2.0% of the outstanding principal for the first10 semi-annual installments, 5.7% of the outstanding principal for the next13 semi-annual installments and the remainder at maturity in February 2035. The principal amount of these debentures will accrue interest at the rate of 80% of the CDI rate. Interest will be capitalized to increase the principal balance under these debentures on an annual basis until February 2023, and will be paidsemi-annually in cash from August 2023 through the final maturity. Telemar’s obligations under these debentures are guaranteed, jointly and severally, by each of Oi, Telemar, Oi Mobile, Oi Coop and PTIF.

Restructured Export Credit Agreements

Oi has entered into one export credit agreement and Telemar has entered into three separate export credit agreements, which we refer to collectively as the Restructured Export Credit Agreements, documenting the recoveries due to the lenders under our novated export credit agreements. The obligations under the Restructured Export Credit Agreements are senior unsecured obligations of Oi and Telemar, respectively, denominated in U.S. dollars that mature in February 2035. Principal under each of the Restructured Export Credit Agreements is payable in24 semi-annual installments beginning in the August 2023, in the amount of 2.0% of the principal amount for the first10 semi-annual installments, 5.7% of the principal amount for the next13 semi-annual installments and the remainder at maturity. Principal under each of the Restructured Export Credit Agreements accrues interest at the rate of 1.75% per annum. Interest will be capitalized on an annual basis until February 2023, and will be paid semi-annually in cash from August 2023 through the final maturity. Oi’s obligations under its Restructured Export Credit Agreement are guaranteed, jointly and severally, by each of Telemar and Oi Mobile, and Telemar’s obligations under its Restructured Export Credit Agreements are guaranteed, jointly and severally, by each of Oi and Oi Mobile.

Restructured BNDES Credit Agreements

By operation of the RJ Plan and the Brazilian Confirmation Order, the credit agreements between BNDES and each of Oi, Telemar and Oi Mobile were novated and BNDES is entitled to receive as recovery for its claims under these credit facilities payment of 100% of the principal amount of the recognized claims inreais, adjusted by the interest/inflation adjustment rate. The principal amount of these claims will be paid in 108 monthly installments beginning in March 2024, in the amount of 0.33% of the outstanding principal for the first 60 monthly installments, 1.67% of the outstanding principal for the next 47 monthly installments and the remainder at maturity in February 2033. The principal amount of these claims accrue interest at the TJLP rate plus 2.946372%per annum. Interest will be capitalized to increase the principal balance under these claims on an annual basis until February 2022, and will be paid monthly in cash thereafter through the final maturity.

Restructured Brazilian Credit Agreements and CRIs

By operation of the RJ Plan and the Brazilian Confirmation Order, provided that Telemar’s unsecured line of credit and our obligations under CRIs backed by receivables representing all payments under leases entered into by Oi and Telemar of real estate owned by Copart 4 and Copart 5 were novated and the creditors under this unsecured line of credit and the holders of the CRIs are entitled to receive as recovery for their claims under these instruments payment of 100% of the principal amount of the recognized claims inreais, payable in24 semi-annual installments beginning in August 2023, in the amount of 2.0% of the recognized claims for the first10 semi-annual installments, 5.7% of the recognized claims for the next13 semi-annual installments and the remainder at maturity in February 2035. The recognized amount of these claims accrue interest at the rate of 80% of the CDI rate. Interest will be capitalized to increase the recognized amount of these claims on an annual basis until February 2023, and will be paid semi-annually in cash from August 2023 through the final maturity.

Non-Qualified Credit Agreement

TheNon-Qualified Credit Agreement is a senior unsecured obligationcredit agreement entered into between the RJ Debtors and an administrative agent in accordance with the terms of Oi.Section 4.3.3.1 of the RJ Plan and Exhibit 4.3.3.1(f). The obligations of Oi under theNon-Qualified Credit Agreement are guaranteed, jointly and severally, by each of Telemar, Oi Mobile, Oi Coop, and PTIF. Principal under theNon-Qualified Credit Agreement will be paid in 12 semiannual installments beginning in August 2024 in the amount of 4% of the outstanding principal for the first sixsemi-annual installments, 12.66% of the outstanding principal for the nextfive semi-annual installments and the remainder at maturity in February 2030. TheNon-Qualified Credit Agreement accrues interest at the rate of 6% per annum. Interest will be capitalized to increase the principal balance under theNon-Qualified Credit Agreement on an annual basis until February 2023, and will be paid together with the principal beginning in August 2024.

Default Recovery

Under the RJ Plan, certain of our creditors were entitled to elect forms of recovery other than the Default Recovery between February 5, 2018 and February 26, 2018. Creditors entitled to make these elections that elected the Default Recovery or failed to make the election are entitled to the Default Recovery with respect to their recognized claims. Holders of Defaulted Bonds that were not eligible to make an election with respect to the form of recovery on their claims are entitled to the Default Recovery with respect to their recognized claims.

Under the RJ Plan, the Default Recovery consists of an unsecured right to receive payment of 100% of the principal amount of the recognized claims represented by:

 

Defaulted Bonds issued by Oi or Oi Coop in five annual, equal installments, commencing on July 22, 2038;

 

Defaulted Bonds issued by PTIF in five annual, equal installments, commencing on June 19, 2038; and

 

Credits the holders of which were entitled to make recovery elections (other than the Defaulted Bonds), in five annual, equal installments, commencing on February 5, 2038, which, in each case, we refer to as the Default Recovery Entitlement.

A holder’s Default Recovery Entitlement is denominated in the currency of the recognized claim with respect to which the Default Recovery Entitlement relates. The Default Recovery Entitlement with respect to Defaulted Bonds denominated in U.S. dollars or euros, as well as the Default Recovery Entitlement for other credits denominated in U.S. dollars, will not bear any interest. The Default Recovery Entitlement with respect to Oi’s 9.75% senior notes due 2016 and other credits denominated inreais will bear interest at the Brazilian TR rate (payable together with the last installment of principal), which will accrue as additional principal amount of the Default Recovery Entitlement until July 22, 2038 (in the case of Oi’s 9.75% senior notes due 2016) or February 5, 2038 (with respect to other credits denominated inreais) and thereafter be payable together with payments of principal amount of the Default Recovery Entitlement. The principal and accrued interest with respect to the Default Recovery Entitlement may be redeemed at any time and from time to time, in whole or in part, by the RJ Debtors at a redemption price of 15% of the aggregate principal amount of the Default Recovery Entitlement.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

WeAs of the date of this annual report, we do not currently have any transactions involvingoff-balance sheet arrangements.

ITEM 6.

DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES

Oi’s board of directors (conselho de administração) and Oi’s board of executive officers(diretoria) are responsible for operating our business.

Board of Directors

General

Oi’s board of directors is a decision-making body responsible for, among other things, determining policies and guidelines for our business and Oi’swholly-owned subsidiaries and controlled companies. Oi’s board of directors also supervises Oi’s board of executive officers and monitors its implementation of the policies and guidelines that are established from time to time by the board of directors. Under the Brazilian Corporate Law, Oi’s board of directors is also responsible for hiring independent accountants.

Oi’sby-laws provide for a board of directors of up to 11 members with no alternate members. Members who are absent at meetings will be entitled to appoint a substitute among the present members to vote in their stead. Pursuant to Oi’sby-laws, at least 20% of the members of the Oi’s board of directors must be independent as defined in the listing regulations of theNovo Mercado segment of the B3 and must be expressly declared as independent in the shareholders’ meeting that elects them, being also considered as independent the members elected as per article 141, paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Brazilian Corporate Law. All of the members of Oi’s board of directors are independent.

Directors are elected at general meetings of shareholders fortwo-year terms and are eligible for reelection. Generally, members of Oi’s board of directors are subject to removal at any time with or without cause at a general meeting of shareholders. The RJ Plan, however, provides certain corporate governance rules that apply to Oi’s board of directors during the effectiveness of the RJ Plan, superseding the provisions of Oi’sby-laws. As provided in the RJ Plan, until the expiration of the term of Oi’s current board of directors, which will occur on September 17, 2020, the members of Oi’s board of directors may not be removed from office, except due to gross mistake, willful misconduct, gross negligence, abuse of term of office or violation of fiduciary duties in accordance with applicable law. Following the expiration of the term of Oi’s current board of directors, the election of subsequent boards of directors will follow the rules established by Oi’sby-laws and the Brazilian Corporate Law. Oi’sby-laws do not contain any citizenship or residency requirements for members of Oi’s board of directors. However, a member’s tenure is conditioned on the appointment of a representative who resides in Brazil, with powers to receive service of process in proceedings initiated against such member based on the corporate legislation, by means of apower-of-attorney with a term of at least three years after the end of such member’s term of office.

Oi’s board of directors is presided over by the chairman of the board of directors and, in his or her absence, on an interim basis, by thevice-chairman of the board of directors and, in his or her absence, on an interim basis, by another member appointed by the chairman or, if no such member has been appointed, by another member appointed by the other members in attendance. Pursuant to Oi’sby-laws, the chairman andvice-chairman of Oi’s board of directors are elected by the members of the Oi’s board of directors during their first meeting following their election. Oi’sby-laws provide that the positions of chairman of Oi’s board of directors and Oi’s chief executive officer or principal executive may not be held by the same person.

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the current members of Oi’s board of directors.

 

Name

  Position  Member Since  Age 

Eleazar de Carvalho Filho

  Chairman  January 2018   6162 

Marcos Grodetzky

  Vice-Chairman  January 2018   6263 

Henrique José Fernandes Luz

  Director  September 2018   6364 

José Mauro Mettrau Carneiro da Cunha

  Director  February 2009   6970 

Marcos Bastos Rocha

  Director  January 2018   5455 

Maria Helena dos Santos Fernandes de Santana

  Director  September 2018   5960 

Paulino do Rego Barros Jr.

  Director  September 2018   62

Ricardo Reisen de Pinho

DirectorAugust 201658

Rodrigo Modesto de Abreu

DirectorSeptember 20184963 

Wallim Cruz de Vasconcellos Junior

  Director  September 2018   6162 

Roger Solé Rafols

  Director  December 2018(1)45

Claudia Quintella Woods

DirectorMarch 2020   44

Armando Lins Netto(1)

DirectorMarch 202051 

 

(1)

Mr. Roger Solé RafolsNetto was nominatedelected to serve on Oi’s board of directors at a meeting of Oi’sthe board of directors held on October 4, 2018, in accordance with Article 150 of the Brazilian Corporate Law and pursuant to Clauses 9.3 and 9.6 of the RJ Plan. Mr. Solé’s nominated became effective on December 5, 2019, upon ANATEL’s approval. Mr. Solé’s election was ratified by the extraordinary shareholders’ meeting heldwhich took place on March 19, 2019.13, 2020. The investiture of Mr. Armando Lins Netto is conditioned upon the prior assessment of ANATEL.

We summarize below the business experience, areas of expertise and principal outside business interests of Oi’s directors.

Directors

Eleazar de Carvalho Filho. Mr. Carvalho has served as the chairman of Oi’s board of directors since September 2018 and a member of Oi’s board of directors since January 2018. He currentlyMr. Carvalho works at Virtus BR Partners, where he is a founding partner. Mr. Carvalho also has served as a member of the board of directors at Brookfield Partners Renewables L.P., TechnipFMC and Companhia Brasileira de Distribuição (Grupo Pão de Açucar)úcar / Cnova N.V.). He is also chairman of the board of trustees of the Brazilian Symphony Orchestra Foundation. Previously, Mr. Carvalho was CEO of Unibanco Banco de Investimento, BNDES and UBS Brasil. He was head of the corporate finance division of Banco Garantia in Rio de Janeiro, director and treasurer of Alcoa Alumínio and director of the international area of Crefisul (Citigroup). Mr. Carvalho has extensive experience as a director of large companies listed in Brazil and abroad. He was a member of the boards of directors of Tele Norte Leste Participações S.A, Petrobras, Companhia Vale do Rio Doce, Eletrobrás, Alpargatas, among others and also President of BHP Billiton Brasil. He holds a bachelor’s degree in economics from New York University and a master’sMaster’s degree in international relations from Johns Hopkins University.

Marcos Grodetzky. Mr. Grodetzky has served as the vice-chairman of Oi’s board of directors since September 2018 and a member of Oi’s board of directors since January 2018. Previously, he served as an alternate member of Oi’s board of directors from September 2015 until July 2016 and as a member of Oi’s board of directors from July 2016 until September 2016. Currently, heMr. Grodetzky is an independent member of the board of directors of Constellation Oil Services, Burger King Brasil, Vicunha Aços and Elizabeth S.A. Indústria Textil.Textil and Chairman of Burger King Brasil. He is the founding partner of Mediator Assessoria Empresarial, engaged in financial advisory and mediation. Until October 2013, Mr. Grodetzky served as CEO of DGB S.A., a logistics holding company of Grupo Abril S.A. and parent company of the following companies: Dinap – Dist. Nacional de Publicações, Magazine Express Comercial Imp e Exp de Revistas, Entrega Fácil Logística Integrada, FC Comercial e Distribuidora, Treelog S.A. – Logística e Distribuição, DGB Logística e Distribuição Geográfica, and TEX Courier (Total Express). In addition, he served as finance and investor relations vice-president of Telemar/Oi, Aracruz Celulose/Fibria, and Cielo S.A from 2002 until 2010. He holds a bachelor’s degree in economics from Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro and attended the Senior Management Program at INSEAD/FDC.

Henrique José Fernandes Luz. Mr. Fernandes Luz has served as a member of Oi’s board of directors since September 2018. He has been a member of the board of directors of the Maringá Group and a member of the consulting board of Racional Engenharia since April 2018. He currentlydirectors of Burger King do Brasil. Mr. Fernandes Luz serves as chairman of the board of the Brazilian Institute of Corporate Governance (Instituto(Instituto Brasileiro de Governança Corporativa – IBGC)IBGC). He was a partner of PricewaterhouseCooperPricewaterhouseCoopers Auditores Independentes from 1988 to 2018, having previously worked various positions in that firm since 1975. He holds a degree in Accounting from Universidade Candido Mendes in Rio de Janeiro and attended various executive programs at Harvard, University of Virginia, London Business School, University of Buenos Aires and Singularity University. He also serves as a vice chairman of the board of IBEF – IBEF—Instituto Brasileiro de Executivos de Finanças and of The Dorina Nowill Foundation for the Blind, and as board member of The National Children and Youth Book Foundation and of The São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro Museums of Modern Art.

José Mauro Mettrau Carneiro da Cunha.Mr. Cunha has served as a member of Oi’s board of directors since February 2009, having served as its chairman until September 2018. Since December 2019, he has been Chairman of Odebrecht S.A., having served as a member of the board of directors since October 2019. Mr. Cunha has also served as Chairman of Braskem S.A. since December 2019. From January 2013 until June 2013, Mr. Cunha served as Oi’s interim chief executive officer, during which time he resigned as chairman and member of Oi’s board of directors. He resumed his position as Oi’s chairman and a member of Oi’s board of directors in June 2013. Mr. Cunha has also served as chairman of the board of directors of Dommo Empreendimentos Imobiliários S.A. from 2007 until December 2016. He previously served as chairman of the board of directors of (1) TNL from April 1999 until March 2003 and from April 2007 until February 2012, where he also served as an alternate director in 2006; (2) Telemar from April 2007 until April 2012, where he served as a member of the board of directors from April 1999 until May 2012; (3) TNL PCS from April 2007 until April 2012; (4) Tele Norte Celular Participações S.A. from April 2008 until February 2012; and (5) Coari Participações S.A. from May 2007 until February 2012. In addition, Mr. Cunha was a director of TmarPartTelemar Participações S.A. from April 2008 until September 2015. He has also served on the board of directors of Santo Antonio Energia S.A. since April 2008 and Pharol since May 2015. He was a member of the board of directors of Vale S.A. from April 2010 until April 2015. Mr. Cunha was an executive officer of Lupatech S.A. from April 2006 to April 2012, where he served as a member of the board of directors from April 2006 to April 2012. He has also held several executive positions at the BNDES, and was a member of its board of executive officers from 1991 to 2002. He was the vice president of strategic planning of Braskem S.A. from February 2003 to October 2005, and business consultant from November 2005 to February 2007. Mr. Cunha was a member of the board of directors ofLog-In Logistica Intermodal S.A. from April 2007 to March 2011, Braskem S.A. from July 2007 to April 2010, Banco do Estado do Espírito Santo S.A. from April 2008 to April 2009, Light Serviços de Eletricidade S.A. from December 1997 to July 2000, Aracruz Celulose S.A. from June 1997 to July 2002, FUNTTEL from December 2000 to January 2002, Fundação Centro de Estudos do Comércio Exterior from June 1997 to January 2002, and Politeno Indústria e Comércio S.A. from April 2003 to April 2004. Mr. Cunha holds a bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering from Universidade Católica de Petrópolis in Rio de Janeiro and a master’sMaster’s degree in industrial and transportation projects from Instituto Alberto Luiz Coimbra dePós-Graduação (COPPE) at the Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. He attended the Executive Program in Management at the Anderson School at the University of California in Los Angeles.

Marcos Bastos RochaRocha.. Mr. Rocha has served as a member of Oi’s board of directors since January 2018. He has been aalso served as chairman of the board of directors of Paranapanema S.A. since March 2020, an independent member of the board of directors of IRB Brasil RE since March 2019, a member of the board of directors of BC2 ConstrutoraInvepar S.A. since April 2016,September 2019, a member of the board of directors of GRU Airport since November 2019 and a member of the board of directors of Brazil Fast Food Corporation since 2009,2009. He has been a senior partner at DealMaker since July 2015 and served as anon-executive senior advisor at Roland Berger Strategy Consultants sincefrom September 2015.2015 until December 2019. He served as a member of the board of directors of BC2 Construtora from April 2016 until May 2019 and alternate member of the board of directors of Light S.A. from September 2018 until April 2019. Between 2010 and 2015, Mr. Rocha was the vice president of finance and administration at Invepar – Investimentos e Participações em Infraestrutura and a member of the boards of directors of the companies in its portfolio. He was a member of the fiscal council of Abril Educação from 2012 to 2015. Between 2008 and 2009, Mr. Rocha was the CFO, investor relations officer, CIO, shared services officer and human resources officer at Globex Utilidades. Previously, he held the following positions: general executive officer at Banco Investcred Unibanco S.A. – Pontocred from 2005 until 2008; CFO and investor relations officer at Sendas S.A. from 2003 until 2005; CFO at the following companies: Horizon Telecom International from 2001 until 2002, GVT – Global Village Telecom in 2001, Global Telecom S.A. from 2000 until 2001 and Brazil Fast Food CorpCorp. (Bob’s) from 1996 until 1998; administrative officer at Sony Music Entertainment from 1998 until 1999; and controller at Cyanamid Química do Brasil from 1991 until 1996. Mr. Rocha holds bachelor’s degree in electronic engineering from the Military Institute of Engineering (IME), an MBAa Master of Business Administration degree in finance fromPUC-RJ and an Executive MBA in management from PDG/EXEC – SDE/IBMEC.

Maria Helena dos Santos Fernandes de Santana. Ms. Fernandes de Santana has served as a member of Oi’s board of directors since September 2018. She has been a member of the board of directors of the Spanish Stock ExchangeBME – Bolsas y Mercados Españoles since April 2016; a member of the audit committee of Itaú Unibanco Holding S.A. since June 2014 and a member of the board of directors and the chairman of the audit committee of XP Inc. Ms. Fernandes served as a trustee of the International Financial Reporting Standards Foundation sincefrom January 2014.2014 until December 2019. She was a member of the board of directors of Companhia Brasileira de Distribuição, a retail company, between February 2013 and June 2017, Totvs S.A., an information technology company, between April 2013 and March 2017 and CPFL Energia S.A., an energy company, between April 2013 and April 2015. She previously worked at the CVM, where she served as president,Chairman, between July 2007 and July 2012, and director,Commissioner, between July 2006 and July 2007. She was chairwoman of the executive committee of the IOSCO – International Organization of Securities Commission between 2011 and 2012. She worked at the São Paulo Stock Exchange (Bolsa de Valores de São Paulo S.A. BVSP), or the BOVESPA, between July 1994 and May 2006, where she was responsible for listed company oversight, attracting new companies and implementing the Novo Mercado. She holds a degree in Economics from the University of São Paulo.

Paulino do Rego Barros Jr. Mr. Barros has served as a member of Oi’s board of directors since September 2018. He was the Interim CEO of Equifax, INC, from September 2017 to April 2018, having previously led the company’s business in theAsia-Pacific region from July to September 2017, the company’s USU.S. Information Solutions business from October 2015 to June 2017 and its international business unit, covering Latin America, Europe, Asia Pacific and Canada, from April 2010 to October 2015. Prior to joining Equifax, he founded PB&C – Global Investments (LLC), an international investment and consulting firm, and has been its President since November 2008. From January 2007 until November 2008, he was the President of AT&T Global Operations. He held various executive positions at BellSouth Corporation from December 2000 to January 2007 before BellSouth was acquired by AT&T, including Corporate Product Officer, President of BellSouth Latin America, Corporate Regional Vice-President of Latin America, and Chief Planning and Operations Officer for BellSouth International. From February 1996 to December 2000, he worked for Motorola, Inc., having served as Corporate Vice President and General Manager – Latin America Group and as Corporate Vice President and General Manager of Market Operations – Americas, for the Cellular Business Unit. He also held various positions at The NutraSweet Company, as well as at the USU.S. and Latin American divisions of Monsanto Company. He served on the advisory board of Cingular Wireless, Converged Services Group and on the board of Alianza – the BellSouth Corporation Latino Association. Between 2012 and 2015, PaulinoMr. Barros served on the board of NII Holdings and he is currently a member of the recently created McKinsey & Company, Inc. – Crisis Response Advisory Board. He holds a degree in mechanical and electrical engineering from the School of Industrial Engineering and the College of Engineering of São José dos Campos, in São Paulo, and holds a master’s degree in business administration from Washington University in St. Louis.

Ricardo ReisenWallim Cruz de Pinho.Vasconcellos Junior. Mr. ReisenVasconcellos has served as a member of Oi’s board of directors since August 2016 having served as its vice-chairman until September 2018. He has approximately 30 years of experience in the financial sector, specifically in mergers and acquisitions, debt restructuring, private equity investments and public share issuances and has participated in various boards of directors in both Brazil and abroad. In 2004, he founded Iposeira Capital Ltda., an independent company specializing in corporate advisory in Brazil. He was a partner at Lakeshore Partners from March 2013 to December 2014 and a founding partner of the STK Capital from 2010 to 2013. From June 2003 to June 2008, he served as Senior Representative in Brazil of the Special Operations Area of the International Finance Corporation – IFC, where he worked on credit recovery and equity investments in Brazil and managed a portfolio of approximately US$300 million. From September 2002 to January 2003, he was Director of the BNDES Industry Segment, responsible for the bank’s projects with companies in the industry, commerce and services sectors, and from October 2001 to August 2002 he served as Superintendent of the BNDES Fixed Income Segment, where he oversaw the department’s restructuring. He served as director of BNDESPAR, a subsidiary of BNDES, from April 1998 to September 2001, where he was responsible for the areas of investments and divestitures, including corporate restructuring, asset portfolio management, development of structured operations in the domestic and international markets, structuring of private equity funds and governance. Mr. Vasconcellos is also an independent member of the board of directors, audit committee, and nominating committee of Light S.A.Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation and Brado Logística S.A.,has served as a member of the advisory board of Editora do Brasil S.A. and a member of Bradespar’s fiscal council, all with terms ending in April 2019. Previously, Mr. Reisen served as an independent member of the boardboards of directors of EMGEACremer, Sendas, Aracruz Celulose, Vale, Marlim Participações, Companhia Distribuidora de Gas do Rio de Janeiro – CEG and Santos Brasil Participações. He also served as Vice President of Property from 2018June 2014 until June 2015 and asVice-President of Finance until 2019 BR Insurance S.A. from 2016 until 2018, Tupy S.A. and Itacaré Capital Investments Ltd. From 2009 until 2015, Saraiva S.A. Livreiros Editores from 2013 until 2015 and 2009 until 2012, Metalfrio Solutions S.A. from 2007 until 2011, and Banco Nossa Caixa S.A. from 2008 until 2009.at Clube de Regatas do Flamengo. He was alsoholds a member of the fiscal council of Embratel Participações S.A. from 2009 to 2010), chairman of the advisory board of LAB SSJ S.A. from 2009 until 2013,degree in Economics and a voluntary board memberpost-graduate degree in Finance from the Pontifical Catholic University of AACDRio de Janeiro. He also holds a masters in Sports Management from 2006 until 2014. As a board member, hethe Cruyff Institute.

Roger Solé Rafols. Mr. Solé has participatedmore than 20 years of experience in advisory committeestelecommunications, in the areas of finance, audit, riskmarketing, product development, innovation, strategy and compliance, peopleP&L management. He has been Vice-President of Marketing at Sprint Corporation since 2015. Prior to that time, he held the following positions: Vice-President of Marketing from 2009 to 2015, and strategy in the above-mentioned companies.Manager of Consumer Marketing from 2009 to 2011 at TIM Brasil; and Marketing Manager – Residential Segment from 2006 to 2008, and Manager of Value Adding Products and Services from 2001 to 2006 at Vivo. He servedalso worked at DiamondCluster, known today as an executive in areas of corporate finance, corporate and investment banking and strategic planning in ABNAmro Bank Brasil, Banco Garantia and Banco Itaú between 1989 andOliver Wyman, from 1996 to 2001. From 2002 until 2014, Mr. Reisen was a senior researcher at Harvard Business School. HeSolé holds a bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineeringBusiness and a Master’s in Business Administration from ESADE – Escuela Superior de Administración y Dirección de Empresas, Barcelona, and a Master’s degree in Management of Audiovisual Companies from UPF – Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Instituto Desarrollo Continuo (IDEC), Barcelona. He also completed an exchange MBA program at UCLA – University of California, Los Angeles; an Advanced Management Program at IESE Business School, Universidad de Navarra, São Paulo-Barcelona; and a short executive education program in Finance and Strategy for Value Creation at The Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Claudia Quintella Woods.Ms. Woods has more than 20 years of experience in strategic planning, marketing and sales, digitalstart-ups and multinational companies. She has been the General Manager of Uber Brasil since February 2019 and has also acted as Retail Director of Banco Original and as Executive Superintendent of Digital Channels (Corporate and Retail) of the aforementioned bank. Prior to that, she held the positions of Chief Executive Officer of Webmotors.com, Marketing and Digital Product Director of Walmart.com, Chief Executive Officer of Netmovies, Chief Marketing and Intelligence Officer for Latin America of Clickon, General Manager of Predicta, Senior Product Group Manager of L’Oréal Brazil, Relationship Marketing Manager of Ibest Company and Senior Consultant of Kaiser Associates. Ms. Woods holds a Bachelor of Arts degree from Bowdoin College, with double major in Environmental Sciences and Spanish and minor in Economics. She holds a Master’s degree in Business Administration from the COPPEAD Institute of the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro – UFRJ) and a certificate of executive education on Building Ventures in Latin America from Harvard Business School.

Armando Lins Netto. Mr. Netto has been CEO of Fleetcor in Brazil since June 2014 responsible for all businesses and companies in the region. He was also Vice President of TIVIT, a Brazilian multinational in digital services, responsible for IT services and businesses. Before that, he was Director of the Banking Practice at Unysis and management consultant with McKinsey & Company at São Paulo and London offices. Mr. Netto holds a bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering from Universidade Federal do Pará (UFPA – 1990), a master’s degree in production engineering/financeMechanical Engineering from Pontifíciathe Universidade Católica do RioEstadual de JaneiroCampinas (UNICAMP – 1993) and a doctoratePhD in business administration/strategyMechanical Engineering from Fundação Getúlio Vargas – EAESP. Mr. Reisen also holds a degree in business administration through the Advanced Management Program of the Wharton School of the University of PennsylvaniaCalifornia, Berkeley (UCB – 1999).

Executive Officers

The board of executive officers is Oi’s executive management body. Oi’s executive officers are Oi’s legal representatives and are responsible for Oi’s internal organization andday-to-day operations and the Programimplementation of the general policies and guidelines established from time to time by Oi’s board of directors.

Oi’sby-laws require that the board of executive officers consist of between three and six members, including a chief executive officer, a chief financial officer, investor relations officer and chief legal officer. Oi’sby-laws provide that Oi’s chief executive officer may not serve as chairman of Oi’s board of directors. Each officer is responsible for Management Developmentbusiness areas that Oi’s board of Harvard Business School. He has been a Certified Accredited Board Memberdirectors assigns to them and, other than Oi’s chief executive officer and Oi’s chief financial officer, need not have formal titles (other than the title of executive officer or “Diretor”).

Generally, the members of Oi’s board of executive officers are elected by Oi’s board of directors fortwo-year terms and are eligible for reelection. Oi’s board of directors may remove any executive officer from office at any time with or without cause. According to the Brazilian InstituteCorporate Law, executive officers must be residents of Corporate Governance (Instituto Brasileiro de Governança Corporativa – IBGC) since 2010Brazil but need not be shareholders of Oi. Oi’s board of executive officers holds meetings when called by Oi’s chief executive officer or any two other members of Oi’s board of executive officers.

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the current members of Oi’s board of executive officers.

Name

PositionDate Elected/
Appointed
Age

Rodrigo Modesto de Abreu

Chief Executive OfficerJanuary 202050

Camille Loyo Faria

Chief Financial Officer and
Investor Relations Officer
October 201946

Antonio Reinaldo Rabelo Filho

Chief Legal OfficerOctober 201944

José Claudio Moreira Gonçalves

Executive Officer without
specific designation
March 201853

Bernardo Kos Winik

Executive Officer without
specific designation
March 201851

Summarized below is information regarding the business experience, areas of expertise and earned a specialization in corporate governance from Harvard Business School.principal outside business interests of Oi’s current executive officers.

Rodrigo Modesto de Abreu. Mr. Abreu has served as a member of Oi’s board of directorsChief Executive Officer since February 2020, having previously served as Chief Operational Officer since September 2018. He has been the2019. Prior to joining Oi, he was Chief Executive Officer of Quod, a big data company focused on credit risk analysis, sincebeginning in June 2017. He was Managing Partner of Giau Consultoria Empresarial Ltda, a boutique management consulting firm, from November 2016 to November 2017, and was at the same time member of the board of directors of Vogel Soluções em Telecomunicações e Informática S.A., which operates fiber optic telecommunication services. From March 2013 to May 2016, he was the Chief Executive Officer and Board Member of TIM Participações S.A. and Chief Executive Officer of TIM Celular S.A. From December 2008 to March 2013, he served as President of the Brazilian operations of Cisco Systems, one of the largest information technology companies globally. Prior to that, Mr. Abreu was also Managing Director of Cisco Systems for the North of Latin America and the Caribbean from May 2006 to December 2008, President of Nortel Networks Brazil, a telecommunications equipment company, from June 2004 to April 2006, and Chief Executive Officer of Promon Tecnologia Ltda., a technology services company, from July 2000 to June 2004. Mr. Abreu holds a degree in Electrical Engineering from the State University of Campinas and an MBA from the Stanford Graduate School of Business.

Wallim Cruz de Vasconcellos JuniorCamille Loyo Faria. Mr. Vasconcellos has served as a member of Oi’s board of directors since September 2018. He has approximately 30 years of experience in the financial sector, specifically in mergers and acquisitions, debt restructuring, private equity investments and public share issuances and has participated in various boards of directors in both Brazil and abroad. In 2004, he founded Iposeira Capital Ltda., an independent company specializing in corporate advisory in Brazil. He was a partner at Lakeshore Partners from March 2013 to December 2014 and a founding partner of the STK Capital from 2010 to 2013. From June 2003 to June 2008, he served as Senior Representative in Brazil of the Special Operations Area of the International Finance Corporation – IFC, where he worked on credit recovery and equity investments in Brazil and managed a portfolio of approximately US$300 million. From September 2002 to January 2003, he was Director of the BNDES Industry Segment, responsible for the bank’s projects with companies in the industry, commerce and services sectors, and from October 2001 to August 2002 he served as Superintendent of the BNDES Fixed Income Segment, where he oversaw the department’s restructuring. He served as director of BNDESPAR, a subsidiary of BNDES, from April 1998 to September 2001, where he was responsible for the areas of investments and divestitures, including corporate restructuring, asset portfolio management, development of structured operations in the domestic and international markets, structuring of private equity funds and governance. He is currently an independent member of the board of directors, audit committee, and nominating committee of Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation and has served as a member of the boards of directors of Cremer, Sendas, Aracruz Celulose (currently Fibria), Vale, Marlim Participações, Companhia Distribuidora de Gas do Rio de Janeiro – CEG and Santos Brasil Participações. He holds a degree in Economics and a post-graduate degree in Finance from the Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro. He also holds a masters in Sports Management from the Cruyff Institute.

Roger Solé Rafols. Mr. Solé has more than 20 years of experience in telecommunications, in the areas of marketing, product development, innovation, strategy and P&L management. He has been Vice-President of Marketing at Sprint Corporation since 2015. Prior to that time, he held the following positions: Vice-President of Marketing from 2009 to 2015, and Manager of Consumer Marketing from 2009 to 2011 at TIM Brasil; and Marketing Manager – Residential Segment from 2006 to 2008, and Manager of Value Adding Products and Services from 2001 to 2006 at Vivo. He also worked at DiamondCluster, known today as Oliver Wyman, from 1996 to 2001. Mr. Solé holds a bachelor’s degree in Business and a Masters in Business Administration from ESADE – Escuela Superior de Administración y Dirección de Empresas, Barcelona, and a Masters in Management of Audiovisual Companies from UPF – Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Instituto Desarrollo Continuo (IDEC), Barcelona. He also completed an exchange MBA program at UCLA – University of California, Los Angeles; an Advanced Management Program at IESE Business School, Universidad de Navarra, São Paulo – Barcelona; and a short executive education program in Finance and Strategy for Value Creation at The Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Executive Officers

The board of executive officers is Oi’s executive management body. Oi’s executive officers are Oi’s legal representatives and are responsible for Oi’s internal organization andday-to-day operations and the implementation of the general policies and guidelines established from time to time by Oi’s board of directors.

Oi’sby-laws require that the board of executive officers consist of between three and six members, including a chief executive officer, a chief financial officer, investor relations officer and chief legal officer. Oi’sby-laws provide that Oi’s chief executive officer may not serve as chairman of Oi’s board of directors. Each officer is responsible for business areas that Oi’s board of directors assigns to them and, other than Oi’s chief executive officer and Oi’s chief financial officer, need not have formal titles (other than the title of executive officer or “Diretor”).

Generally, the members of Oi’s board of executive officers are elected by Oi’s board of directors fortwo-year terms and are eligible for reelection. Oi’s board of directors may remove any executive officer from office at any time with or without cause. According to the Brazilian Corporate Law, executive officers must be residents of Brazil but need not be shareholders of Oi. Oi’s board of executive officers holds meetings when called by Oi’s chief executive officer or any two other members of Oi’s board of executive officers.

The RJ Plan, however, provides certain corporate governance rules that apply to Oi’s board of executive officers during the effectiveness of the RJ Plan, superseding the provisions of Oi’sby-laws. For example, Oi’s board of directors may appoint a new board of executive officers, provided that Eurico de Jesus Teles Neto and Carlos Augusto Machado Pereira de Almeida Brandão must remain on the board of executive officers as chief executive officer and chief financial officer/investor relations officer, respectively, until Oi ceases to be supervised by the RJ Court, which will occur on the second anniversary of the Judicial Ratification of the RJ Plan; provided that, if Mr. Teles and Mr. Brandão are removed from their positions as chief executive officer and chief financial officer/investor relations officer, respectively, prior to the closing of the RJ Plan, then they receive the compensation packages to which they are currently entitled.

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the current members of Oi’s board of executive officers.

Name

Position

Date Elected/
Appointed

Age

Eurico de Jesus Teles Neto

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Legal OfficerNovember 201762

Carlos Augusto Machado Pereira de Almeida Brandão

Chief Financial Officer and Investor Relations OfficerMarch 201844

José Claudio Moreira Gonçalves

Executive Officer without specific designationMarch 201852

Bernardo Kos Winik

Executive Officer without specific designationMarch 201851

Summarized below is information regarding the business experience, areas of expertise and principal outside business interests of Oi’s current executive officers.

Eurico de Jesus Teles Neto. Mr. Teles has served as Oi’s chief executive officer since November 2017 and as Oi’s chief legal officer since May 2016, having previously served as one of Oi’s executive officers from April 2012 until May 2016. He was a member of Oi’s board of directors from 2009 to 2011 and an alternate member of Oi’s board of directors until April 2012. He previously served as a member of the board of directors of Coari Participações S.A. from 2009 until February 2012 and has been a member of the board of directors of Telemar from 2009 until its termination in 2012. He was the legal officer of TNL from April 2007 through February 2012 and the legal manager of Telemar from April 2005 until April 2007. He previously served as manager of the securities division at Telecomunicações de Bahia S.A., where he went on to hold the position of legal consultant in 1990. Mr. Teles holds a bachelor’s degree in economic sciences and law from Universidade Católica de Salvador and holds a master’s degree in employment law from Universidade Estácio de Sá.

Carlos Augusto Machado Pereira de Almeida Brandão. Mr. BrandãoMs. Loyo Faria has served as Oi’s chief financial officer and investor relations officer since March 2018. HeOctober 2019. Ms. Loyo Faria previously served as Oi’s interim chief financial officer and interim investor relations officer since October 2017. Previously, he was an analyst at Energisa S.A., from 2000 to 2001, an analyst at Furnas S.A. from 2002 to 2003 and specialist in planning and control at Sendas S.A. from 2003 to 2004. He has held various positions within Oi and Telemar Norte Leste S.A. since 2004, including Market Specialist, Revenue Planning Coordinator, Business Valuation Manager, Senior Manager of New Business and M&A, Senior Manager of Planning and Budget, Director of Energy, Technology, Media, Telecom and Industries at Bank of America Merrill Lynch. Previously, she held director positions, through which she was responsible for energy, technology, media and telecom at Bradesco BBI and Morgan Stanley. Ms. Loyo Faria also has extensive executive experience in the telecommunications and infrastructure sector, having held positions as Chief Executive Officer of Multiner, Chief Financial Officer of Terna Participações and Strategy Leader at Embratel and Fronts of TransformationTelecom Italia Group in Brazil and Director of International Operations. HeLatin America. Ms. Loyo Faria holds a degree in managementchemical engineering from UFJF (Federal University of JuizPontífica Universidade Católica in Rio de Fora) and aJaneiro, an MBA degree in statisticsfinance from UFJF as well asIbmec in Rio de Janeiro and a master’s degree in financeindustrial engineering from IBMEC.Pontífica Universidade Católica in Rio de Janeiro.

Antonio Reinaldo Rabelo Filho. Mr. Rabelo Filho has served as Oi’s chief legal officer since October 2019. Mr. Rabelo Filho began his career at PricewaterhouseCoopers Brasil, which he left for Oi in 2000, where he held financial and legal positions, most recently in the Tax Law Directorate from 2007 to 2017. Since 2017, Mr. Rabelo Filho has been a partner at Andrade Rabelo Advogados Associados and played an active role in Oi’s judicial reorganization process and served as the foreign representative of Oi’s Judicial Reorganization in the courts of New York and the United Kingdom. Mr. Rabelo Filho has also held leadership positions on the board of the main technical associations in the telecommunications sector and is a member of the National and State Commissions of Tax Law and Judicial Recovery and Bankruptcy of the Brazilian Bar Association. Mr. Rabelo Filho holds a law degree from the Federal University of Bahia, a graduate degree in Business Law from IBMEC/RJ and a master’s degree in Tax Law from Pontífica Universidade Católica in São Paulo.

José Claudio Moreira Gonçalves. Mr. Gonçalves has served as Oi’s chief operating officer since March 2018. He built his career in the telecommunications industry and has expertise in the operation, maintenance and technological development of Oi’s networks. Mr. Gonçalves previously served as Oi’s executive director of operations since June 2011. He joined Oi in March 2000, having served as operations manager, director of network deployment and director of engineering. Mr. Gonçalves holds a bachelor’s degree in mechanical production engineering from Pontifícia Universidade Católica(PUC-Rio), a master’s degree in business administration from Fundação Getúlio Vargas(FGV-RJ), an executive MBA from Fundação Dom Cabral (FDC) and apost-executive MBA from the Kellogg School of Management.

Bernardo Kos Winik. Mr. Winik has served as Oi’s chief commercial officer since March 2018. He previously served as Oi’s director of retail since December 2014 and director of retail sales from September 2011 to December 2014. He has experience in the technology, consulting and telecommunications markets, having worked in companies such as Claro, BS Consulting, NCR and EDS do Brasil. Mr. Winik holds a bachelor’s degree in information technology form Universidade Mackenzie and apost-graduate degree in business from Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (EAESP/FGV).

Fiscal Council

The Brazilian Corporate Law requires Oi to establish a permanent ornon-permanent fiscal council(conselho fiscal).Oi’sby-laws provide for a permanent fiscal council composed of between three and five members and their respective alternate members. The fiscal council is a separate corporate body independent of Oi’s board of directors, Oi’s board of executive officers and Oi’s independent accountants. The primary responsibility of the fiscal council is to review Oi’s management’s activities and Oi’s financial statements and to report their findings to Oi’s shareholders.

The members of Oi’s fiscal council are elected by Oi’s shareholders at the annual shareholders’ meeting forone-year terms and are eligible for reelection. The terms of the members of Oi’s fiscal council expire at the annual shareholders’ meeting in 2020. Under the Brazilian Corporate Law, the fiscal council may not contain members who are members of Oi’s board of directors or Oi’s board of executive officers, spouses or relatives of any memberof Oi’s board of directors or Oi’s board of executive officers, or our employees. To be eligible to serve on Oi’s fiscal council, a person must be a resident of Brazil and either be a university graduate or have been a company officer or fiscal council member of another Brazilian company for at least three years prior to election to Oi’s fiscal council. Holders of Preferred Shares without voting rights andnon-controlling common shareholders that together hold at least 10.0% of Oi’s voting share capital are each entitled to elect one member and his or her respective alternate to the fiscal council.

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the current members of Oi’s fiscal council and their alternates.

 

Name

  Position Member
Since
  Age 

Pedro Wagner Pereira Coelho

  Chairman April 2016   7071 

Patricia Valente Stierli

  Alternate April 2019   6264 

Álvaro Bandeira

  Member April 2016   6869 

Wiliam da Cruz Leal

  Alternate April 2018   6263 

Daniela Maluf Pfeiffer

  Member April 2018   4849 

Luiz Fernando Nogueira

  Alternate April 2019   5253 

Raphael Manhães Martins(1)Martins(1)

  Member April 2019   3637 

Domenica Eisenstein Noronha(1)Noronha(1)

  Alternate April 2018   4143 

 

(1)

Elected by Oi’s preferred shareholders.

We summarize below the business experience, areas of expertise and principal outside business interests of the current members of Oi’s fiscal council and their alternates.

Fiscal Council Members

Pedro Wagner Pereira Coelho. Mr. Coelho has served as chairman of Oi’s fiscal council since April 2017 and member since April 2016. He has also served as chairman of the fiscal council of Magnesita Refratários S.A. since April 2008, as member of the fiscal council of Parnaiba Gas Natural S.A. since October 2015 and as member of the supervisory board of Estácio Participações S.A. since April 2012. Mr. Coelho was also a partner of Carpe Diem – Consultoria, Planejamento e Assessoria Empresarial Ltda. Fromfrom 2011 until 2016. He worked as controller at Banco de Investimentos Garantia S/A., investment bank, from May 1982 until July 1997 and as an auditor at Pricewaterhouse CoopersPricewaterhouseCoopers Auditores Independentes from October 1978 to April 1981. Previously, he was chairman of the fiscal council of Lojas Americanas S.A., Tele Norte Leste Participações S.A., Telemar Participações S.A., TAM S.A. and Empresa Energética de Mato Grosso do Sul S.A. (Enersul). Mr. Coelho holds a bachelor’s degree in business administration from the Sociedade Universitária Augusto Motta – SUAM and in accounting from Sociedade Madeira de Ley – SOMLEY.

Álvaro Bandeira. Mr. Bandeira has served as a member of Oi’s fiscal council since April 2017 and as an alternate member of Oi’s fiscal council since April 2016. He has also served as chief economist of Brokerage Modalmais since 2015, the year he joined the institution. Mr. Bandeira also served as chief economist of Orama from 2011 to 2015 and held various positions at Ágora Corretora from April 2001 until December 2010. He was president of the Brazilian Futures Exchange, president of regional chapters of APIMEC for five administrations, Director of BVRJ and BM&F, as well as former full member of the Supervisory Board of Souza Cruz. Mr. Bandeira has spoken in several conferences related to the capital markets and personal finance and has developed lectures at universities and companies on related issues. He regularly contributes to publications regarding economics, and on financial education websites including Dinheirama and Infomoney. Mr. Bandeira holds a bachelor’s degree in economics from UFRJ and a graduate degree in administration from Coppe – RUFRJ.–RUFRJ.

Daniela Maluf Pfeiffer.Mrs. Pfeiffer has served as a member of Oi’s fiscal council since April 2018. She has worked asis a senior analystpartner at DXA Investments, an investmentasset management firm, since January 2018. She was a partner at Canepa Asset Brasil, aalso funds management company, and was responsible for investors’ relations from January 2014 to October 2017. She previously worked as a partner at Nova Gestão de Recursos, an investment firm, from October 2011 to June 2013. Currently, Mrs. Pfeiffer is not a member of any management body of a publicly-held company. She was previously a member of the fiscal council of Banco Sofisa S.A. from April 2014 to April 2017; a member of the fiscal council of Viver Incorporadora e Construtora S.A. from April 2011 to April 2017; a member of the fiscal council of Banco Panamericano S.A. from September 2010 to April 2014; a member of the fiscal council of Santos Brasil S.A. from 2003 to 2005; a member of the Board of Directors of Brasil Telecom S.A. from 2003 to 2005; a member of the Board of Directors of Telemig Celular S.A. from 2003 to 2005; a member of the Board of Directors of Amazônia Celular S.A., or Amazônia, from 2003 to 2005; a member of the Fiscal Council of Amazônia Celular S.A. from 1998 to 2002 and a member of the fiscal council of Telemig Celular S.A. from 1998 to 200. She is an IBGC-certified fiscal council member. Mrs. Pfeiffer holds a degree in administration by UFRJ from 1992 and is currently enrolled in an MBA program in corporate management at FGV, which she is expected to complete in March 2019.from FGV.

Raphael Manhães Martins.Mr. Martins has served as a member of Oi’s fiscal council since April 2019. He has been a partner at the law firm Faoro & Fucci since 2010. In 2010, he was a professor at Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ).UFRJ. From 2007 to 2009, he was a professor at Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ). Mr. Martins has served as a member of the board of directors of Eternit S.A. since 2015, Light S.A. since 2018 and Condor S.A. – Indústria QuĺQuímica since 2017. He has also served as a member of the fiscal council of Vale S.A. since 2015. Previously, Mr. Martins served as a member of the fiscal council of Light S.A. from 2014 to 2018 and Embratel Participações S.A. in 2014. Mr. Martins is a member of the Brazilian Bar Association, Rio de Janeiro Section(OAB-RJ).

Alternate Fiscal Council Members

Patricia Valente Stierli.Mrs. Valente has served as an alternate member of Oi’s fiscal council since April 2019. SheMrs. Valente is currently a member of the fiscal council of Eletrobras – Centrais Elétricas S.A., as a financial specialist (since 2017), a member of the board of directors of PPE Fios Esmaltados S.A. (since 2018), a member of the fiscal council of Sociedade Beneficiente de Senhoras – Hospital Sírio Libanês (tenured from 2018 to 2021) and an alternate member of the fiscal council of Centro de Integração Empresa Escola CIEE (since 2018). Mrs. Valente previously served as a member of the fiscal council of Bardella S.A. Indústrias Mecânicas, (from 2015 to October 2018, a member of the board of directors of Pettenati S.A. Indústria Têxtil (during 2015), an alternate member of the fiscal council of Dohler S.A. (from 2017 to 2018) and a member of the board of directors and fiscal council of publicly-held companies, as a minority shareholders’ representative. In addition, Mrs. Valente has experience managingthird-party resources, after having been a statutory officer at Banco Fator S.AS.A. and Sadefem Equipamentos for six years, working in management and being in charge of institutional and retail clients. She also worked as a financial officer at Montagens S.A., where she was in charge of accounting, fiscal, budget, treasury and human resources. Mrs. Valente holds a bachelorbachelor’s degree in business administration from the Fundação Getúlio Vargas Foundation (FGV) and completed a Management for Graduates specialization course at CEAG (MBA) –EAESP—EAESP / FGV and her specialization in controllership course at GVPEC.

Wiliam da Cruz Leal. Mr. Leal has served as an alternate member of Oi’s fiscal council since April 2018. He has extensive experience in corporate governance, corporate sustainability, enterprise risk management, internal controls, technology and information security. Since 2011 he has been a managing partner at Cruz Leal Gestão Empresarial Ltda., a consulting firm specialized in motivation, leadership, technology, corporate governance and sustainability. He has been certified by the Brazilian Institute of Corporate Governance (Instituto Brasileiro de Governança Corporativa – IBGC) since 2009. Previously, Mr. Leal worked at Tele Norte Leste Participações S.A., from 2000 to 2009, having served as executive manager of corporate governance, internal controls manager, budget and special projects manager and systems audit manager. He also worked at Banco do Brasil S.A., from 1975 to 2000, having served as executive manager of changes and analyst information technology consultant. Mr. Leal holds a bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering from Fundação de Ensino Superior de Itaúna, Minas Gerais.

Luiz Fernando Nogueira. Mr. Nogueira has served as an alternate member of Oi’s fiscal council since April 2019. Since May 2016, Mr. Nogueira has served as chief financial officer of Neogas, having previously served as chief financial officer of Brookfield Renewable Energy, Ferroport, Concremat, Bematech and Timnet (a TIM group company). In addition, he also served as executive manager investor relations at Petrobras and planning and control manager for Latin America at IBM. Mr. Nogueira holds a bachelor’s degree in economics from Pontifícia Universidade Católica, a post-graduate degree in financial management from Fundação Getúlio Vargas and an MBA in finance from IBMEC, and he completed a training course in conflict mediation at Mediare.

Domenica Eisenstein Noronha. Ms. Noronha has served on Oi’s fiscal council since April 2018 (as a member since April 2018 and as an alternate member since April 2019). Mrs. Noronha has more than 19 years of experience in the financial industry. Since 2010, she has been a member of Tempo Capital Gestão de Recursos Ltda., an independent fund manager focused on the Brazilian equity market. Her responsibilities include economic and financial analysis of investments, investor relations, supervision of compliance and regulatory review. Previously, Mrs. Noronha worked for 11 years at Morgan Stanley in New York, where she was involved in M&A for Latin American companies, and São Paulo, where she was executive director responsible for equity and debt capital markets transactions. She served as a member of the fiscal council of the following publicly-held companies in Brazil: Fibria Celulose S.A., from February 2017 to April 2018; Usinas Siderúrgica de Minas Gerais S.A. – Usiminas, from April 2015 to April 2016 and from April 2017 to April 2018; and Embratel Participações S.A., from April 2012 to August 2014). Mr. Noronha holds a bachelor’s degree in business administration from Georgetown University, majoring in finance, international business and economics.

Compensation

According to Oi’sby-laws, Oi’s shareholders are responsible for establishing the aggregate compensation we pay to the members of Oi’s board of directors, board of executive officers and fiscal council. Oi’s shareholders determine this compensation at Oi’s annual shareholders’ meeting. Once aggregate compensation is established, Oi’s board of directors is responsible for distributing such aggregate compensation individually to the members of Oi’s board of directors and Oi’s board of executive officers in compliance with Oi’sby-laws.

The aggregate compensation paid by us to all members of Oi’s board of directors, board of executive officers and fiscal council for services in all capacities in 2018during 2019 was R$81.964.5 million. This amount includes pension, retirement or similar benefits for Oi’s officers and directors. At Oi’s 20192020 annual shareholders’ meeting, Oi’s shareholders established the following compensation for the year 2019:2020:

 

board of directors: an aggregate limit of approximately R$14.78.2 million;

 

board of executive officers: an aggregate limit of approximately R$44.069.6 million; and

 

fiscal council: the minimum amount established under Paragraph 3 of Article 162 of the Brazilian Corporate Law.

Oi compensates alternate members of its fiscal council for each meeting of the fiscal council that they attend.

Oi’s executive officers receive the same benefits generally provided to our employees, such as medical (including dental) assistance, private pension plan and meal vouchers. Like our employees, Oi’s executive officers also receive an annual bonus equal toone-month’s salary (knownas the “thirteenth” (monthly) salary in Brazil), an additionalone-third ofone-month’s salary for vacation, and contributions of 8.0% of their salary into a defined contribution pension fund known as the Guarantee Fund for Time of Service(Fundo de Garantia por Tempo de Serviço).Members of Oi’s board of directors and fiscal council are not entitled to these benefits.

Members of Oi’s board of directors board of executive officers and fiscal council are not parties to contracts providing for benefits upon thetheir termination. Some of our executive officers are entitled to severance payments in certain circumstances upon termination of employment other than, in the case of executive officers, the benefits described above.their contracts.

Long-Term Incentive Program

On March 13, 2015, Oi’s board of directors approved a long-term incentive plan for certain of Oi’s executives. The purpose of thelong-term incentive plan is to encourage integration, align the interests of management with that of shareholders and retain our strategic executives in the medium- and long-term. Thelong-term incentive plan program ran from 2015 until 2017. Compensation under the long-term incentive plan, calculated based on Oi’s share price, and was paid in three annual installments in 2016, 2017 and 2018. In 2016,During 2018 and 2017, and 2018, we paid aggregate amounts of R$15.7 million, R$13.621.8 million and R$21.813.6 million, respectively, pursuant to thelong-term incentive plan.

On April 26, 2019, Oi’s shareholders approved two share-based long-term incentive plans for the period from 2019 to 2021: one the members of Oi’s board of directors, and the other for certain executives for the period from 2019 to 2021.executives. The purpose of these long-term incentive plansthe plan for the members of the board of directors is to encourage integration,promote high engagement levels of the members of the board of directors, to keep the members committed to supporting our meeting of our strategic goals, and to seek to align the interestsmembers with our shareholders in the medium and long term. The purpose of management with thatthe plan for the executives is to promote a high level of shareholders and retaincommitment of these executives, to keep them committed in order to ensure the achievement of our strategic goals, and to seek to align the executives inwith our shareholders for the medium-medium andlong-term. long term.

Under these plans, the board of directors is authorized to make annual grants of Common Shares to members of the board of directors and to our executives. The maximum number of sharesCommon Shares permitted to be granted is limited to beneficiaries of theselong-term incentive plans cannot exceed 1.5% of the total capital stock of Oi as of April 26, 2019 under the plan for our executives, and 0.4% under the plan for the board of directors. Common Shares granted under these plans vest in equal amounts over a three year period, subject to conditions of continued employment and conditions related to the market valuation of our Common Shares.

At the time of the approval of these plans by our shareholders, our board of directors decided that we would refrain from implementing these plans until the RJ Court rendered a judgement regarding these plans. On December 20, 2019, the RJ Court ruled that the plan for members of our board of directors would be suspended until the conclusion of the RJ Proceedings. On December 30, 2019, we made grants of 33,704,937 Common Shares to our executives. Following the conclusion of the RJ Proceedings, the plan for members of our board of directors will be implemented in the form approved on April 26, 2019.

Committees

Audit, Risks and Controls Committee

The Audit, Risks and Controls Committee (Comitê de Auditoria, Riscos e Controle), or the CARC, is anon-statutory statutory advisory committee to Oi’sour board of directors. According to its internal regulations, the CARC is responsible for:

 

advising Oi’sour board of directors in connection with business risk assessment, internal control mechanisms and supervising internal audits;

 

promoting communications between the company’s administrative and supervisory bodies, independent auditors and the internal audit bodies; and

 

supervising the management and control of contingencies.contingencies; and

analyzing the quarterly information and the financial statements prepared periodically by the company, including the audited consolidated financial statements, as well as the management report and any analysis disclosed by management of our company’s financial condition and operating results.

The CARC must be composed of three to five members, the majorityall of whom must be members of Oi’s board of directors. Executive officersdirectors and other employeesmeet the independence requirements of Oi cannot serve onRule10A-3 under the CARC.Exchange Act. According to article 32 of Oi’sby-laws, the members of the CARC are appointed by Oi’s board of directors.

Members of the CARC serve for atwo-year terms that coincide with the terms of the members of our board of directors. One of the members is designated as the chairman of the CARC. The current members of the CARC are: Henrique José Fernandes Luz (chairman of the committee and member of Oi’s board of directors);(chairman), Marcos Bastos Rocha, (member of Oi’s board of directors); Marcos Grodetzky, (member of Oi’s board of directors); Wallim Cruz de VasconcelosVasconcellos Junior, (member of Oi’s board of directors); and Maria Helena dos Santos Fernandes de Santana (memberSantana.

The CARC is responsible for performing the functions of Oi’s board of directors).

On April 26, 2019, Oi’s shareholders approved management’s proposal to transform the CARC into a statutory audit committee. As a statutoryan audit committee the CARC will satisfy the audit committee requirements ofset forth in Rule10A-3 under the Exchange Act, including its independence requirements.

The CARCother than the engagement and dismissal of our independent auditors. Under Brazilian law, the function of engaging independent auditors is expected to begin to function as a statutory audit committee on May 26, 2019.

People, Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee

The People, Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee (Comitê de Gente, Nomeações e Governança Corporativa) is an advisory committee to Oi’sreserved for the board of directors. According to its internal regulations,As a result, as specified in Section 3(a)(58) of the People, Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for:

reviewing, recommending and monitoring strategies for developing and managing the talents and human capital of Oi and its subsidiaries;

preparing and periodically reviewing, in merely indicative terms, the selection criteria and summary of qualifications, knowledge and professional experience as a proper profile for performing functions as a member of an administrative body of Oi and its subsidiaries;

giving opinions on the profiles of candidates for members of Oi’sExchange Act, our board of directors Oi’s board of executive officers and members of Oi’s advisory committees, in the processes of presenting candidates by Oi’s board of directors and designation or substitution by the board of directors, considering that the hiring of officers that report to the chief executive officer must be informed in advance to this committee;

coordinating the process of selection and appointment of Oi’s chief executive officer and giving opinions on the selection process of Oi’s statutory executive officers;

taking part in discussions regarding major changes to the organizational structure of Oi and its subsidiaries (first and second levels below the chief executive officer);

monitoring the succession programfunctions as our audit committee for the principal executivespurpose of Oiapproving any engagement of our independent auditors for audit and its subsidiaries, recommending actions at the first management level and establishing directives for the succession program for other levels of Oi and its subsidiaries;

analyzing, recommending and monitoring special programs, such as voluntary termination and early retirement, among others;

evaluating the strategy for developing and training third parties;

analyzing and recommendingnon-audit services provided to Oi’s board of directors the policy for compensating members of bodies and employees of Oi and its subsidiaries, including fixed and variable remuneration, any type of incentive, benefits programs and stock options;us or our subsidiaries.

analyzing and recommending to Oi’s board of directors parameters for the bonus program for Oi and its subsidiaries;

analyzing and recommending to Oi’s board of directors compensation policies and practices for members of the board of directors itself, the advisory committees and the audit board, subject to the provisions of Art. 162, §3, of the Brazilian Corporate Law and subsequent changes;

analyzing and recommending defining goals for Oi and its subsidiaries and metrics and scale of variable annual compensation and for each term, especially, as a function of compliance with strategy, risk profile, plans and budget;

analyzing and recommending compliance of annual performance based on the defined goals;

analyzing and recommending a system of evaluation of performance, including its timing and methods;

preparing the annual evaluation of performance of the members of Oi’s board of directors and Oi’s executive officers in relation to the goals approved by the board of directors, reviewing the evaluations of the high executives of Oi and its subsidiaries and submitting the evaluation to Oi’s board of directors;

analyzing and recommending to Oi’s board of directors distribution of individual compensation by the members of Oi’s board of directors and officers;

analyzing and recommending strategy to Oi’s board of directors regarding pension plans of Oi and its subsidiaries, particularly regarding extraordinary contributions to complementary retirement funds;

analyzing and recommending to Oi’s board of directors the corporate governance policies to be adopted by Oi, always observing the provisions of the standards applicable to Oi, in particular with regard to the corporate governance model, principles and practices to be adopted; and

analyzing and recommending to Oi’s board of directors, in accordance with applicable rules, adjustments and improvements to Oi’s corporate governance policies whenever deemed necessary and ensure compliance with applicable standards, in particular Oi’s listings on Level 1 of the B3 and the NYSE.

The People, Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee must be composed of three to five members, the majority of whom must be members of Oi’s board of directors. Executive officers and other employees of Oi cannot serve on the People, Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee. According to article 32 of Oi’sby-laws, the members of the People, Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee are appointed by Oi’s board of directors. The current members of the People, Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee are: Maria Helena dos Santos F. Santana (chairman of the committee and member of Oi’s board of directors); Marcos Grodetzky (member of Oi’s board of directors); Henrique Jose Fernandes Luz (member of Oi’s board of directors); and Sergio Luiz de Toledo Piza (external expert).

Share Ownership

As of April 23, 2019,24, 2020, the number of Common Shares and Preferred Shares held by the members of Oi’s board of directors and board of executive officers, supervisory or management bodies, including outstanding stock options, do not exceed 1% of either class of Oi’s outstanding shares.

Employees

As of December 31, 2018,2019, we had a total of 56,87558,089 employees. All of our employees are employed on a full-time basis, divided into the following functions: network operations, sales and marketing, information technology, call center operations and support areas and authorized agents.areas.

The table below sets forth a breakdown of our employees by main category of activity and geographic location as of the dates indicated:

 

  December 31,   December 31, 
  2018   2017   2016   2019   2018   2017 

Number of employees by category of activity:

            

Plant operation, maintenance, expansion and modernization

   34,620    33,019    32,066    36,149    34,620    33,019 

Sales and marketing

   5,131    5,069    4,945    4,808    5,131    5,069 

Call center operations

   14,993    13,202    12,700    15,046    14,993    13,202 

Support areas

   2,131    4,002    3,912    2,086    2,131    4,002 

Authorized agents

   —      154    143            154 
    

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

 

Total

   56,875    55,446    53,766    58,089    56,875    55,446 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Number of employees by geographic location:

            

Rio de Janeiro

   15,406    16,657    16,235    15,296    15,406    16,657 

Goiás

   7,666    6,795    7,036    7,708    7,666    6,795 

Paraná

   6,996    6,040    5,654    7,175    6,996    6,040 

Mato Gross do Sul

   3,818    3,077    2,383    3,542    3,818    3,077 

São Paulo

   1,630    1,612    1,626    1,470    1,630    1,612 

Minas Gerais

   1,544    1,506    1,475    1,437    1,544    1,506 

Rio Grande do Sul

   3,730    3,555    3,318    3,945    3,730    3,555 

Bahia

   3,345    3,439    3,658    4,115    3,345    3,439 

Federal District

   715    588    541    770    715    588 

Santa Catarina

   2,195    2,503    2,337    2,025    2,195    2,503 

Pernambuco

   2,108    1,756    1,763    2,185    2,108    1,756 

Ceará

   1,941    1,746    1,810    1,828    1,941    1,746 

Pará

   1,367    1,536    1,465    1,599    1,367    1,536 

Mato Grosso

   192    195    191    199    192    195 

Maranhão

   806    963    960    1,098    806    963 

Amazonas

   730    624    613    821    730    624 

Espírito Santo

   148    143    147    132    148    143 

Paraiba

   462    503    485    439    462    503 

Piauí

��  522    572    447    601    522    572 

Rondônia

   89    86    87    88    89    86 

Rio Grande do Norte

   458    495    452    436    458    495 

Sergipe

   328    345    362    284    328    345 

Alagoas

   290    326    341    269    290    326 

Tocantins

   61    55    59    68    61    55 

Amapá

   154    153    142    251    154    153 

Acre

   40    40    41    39    40    40 

Roraima

   134    136    138    269    134    136 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   56,875    55,446    53,766    58,089    56,875    55,446 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

We negotiate separate collective bargaining agreements with three union committees each representing the local unions in several Brazilian states. New collective bargaining agreements are negotiated every year. We maintain good relations with each of the unions representing our employees. As of December 31, 2018,2019, approximately 41.0%40.5%, respectively, of the employees of our company were members of state labor unions associated either with the National Federation of Telecommunications Workers (Federação Nacional dos Trabalhadores em Telecomunicações) or with the Interstate Federation of Telecommunications Workers (Federação Interestadual dos Trabalhadores em Telecomunicações). We have never experienced a strike that had a material effect on our operations.

Employee Benefits

Pension Benefit Plans

Sistel

Sistel is anot-for-profit private pension fund created by Telebrás in November 1977 to supplement the benefits provided by the federal government to employees of the former Telebrás System. The following are pension plans managed by Sistel.

PBS-A Plan

. Since the privatization of Telebrás, the Sistel Benefits Plan (Plano de Benefícios da Sistel – Assistidos), orPBS-A plan, a defined benefit plan, has been sponsored by the fixed-line telecommunications companies that resulted from the privatization of Telebrás, including our company and TNL. ThePBS-A plan isself-funded and has been closed to new members since January 2000. Contributions to thePBS-A plan are contingent on the determination of an accumulated deficit and we are jointly and severally liable, along with otherfixed-line telecommunications companies, for 100% of any insufficiency in payments owed to members of thePBS-A plan. As of December 31, 2018,2019, thePBS-A plan had a surplus of R$1,683 million. We were not required to make contributions to thePBS-A plan in 2018.2019.

PAMA Plan and PCE Plan

Plan.Since the privatization of Telebrás, the Medical Assistance Plan to the Retired (Plano de Assistência Médica ao Aposentado), or PAMA, a health-care plan managed by Sistel, has been sponsored by the fixed-line telecommunications companies that resulted from the privatization of Telebrás, including our company. The PAMA plan has been closed to new members since February 2000, other than new beneficiaries of current members and employees that are covered by thePBS-A plan who have not yet elected to join the PAMA plan. In December 2003, we and the other telecommunications companies that resulted from the privatization of Telebrás began sponsoring the PCE – Special–Special Coverage Plan, or the PCE plan, ahealth-care plan managed by Sistel. The PCE plan is open to employees that are covered by the PAMA plan. From February to July 2004, December 2005 to April 2006, June to September 2008, July 2009 to February 2010, March to November 2010, February 2011 to March 2012 and March 2012 until today, we offered incentives to our employees to migrate from the PAMA plan to the PCE plan.

In October 2015, in compliance with a court order, Sistel transferred the R$3,042 million surplus in thePBS-A plan to the PAMA plan to ensure the solvency of the PAMA plan. Of the total amount transferred, R$2,127 million is related to the plans sponsored by the company, apportioned proportionally to the obligations of the defined benefit plan.

As of December 31, 2018,2019, the PAMA plan had a surplus of R$36 million.279million. We were not required to make contributions to the PAMA plan in 2018.the year ended December 31, 2019.

Fundação Atlântico de Seguridade Social

FATL is anot-for-profit, independent private pension fund that manages pension plans for the employees of its plans’ sponsors.

PBS-TNCPBS-TNCP Plan

Plan.Since the privatization of Telebrás, our subsidiary Tele Norte Celular Participações S.A., or TNCP, has sponsored the Sistel Benefits Plan – TNCP (Plano de Benefícios da Sistel – TNCP), orPBS-TNCPBS-TNCP plan. ThePBS-TNCPBS-TNCP plan has been closed to new members since April 2004. Contributions to thePBS-TNCPBS-TNCP plan are contingent on the determination of an accumulated deficit. As a result of the corporate reorganization and TNL’s earlier acquisition of control of TNCP, we are liable for 100% of any insufficiency in payments owed to members of thePBS-TNCPBS-TNCP plan. Since January 2016, thePBS-TNCPBS-TNCP plan has been managed by FATL.

As of December 31, 2018,2019, thePBS-TNCPBS-TNCP Planplan had a surplus of R$824 million. ThePBS-TNC Plan holds a portfolio of federal government bonds(NTN-B) carriedWe were not required to maturity, which enables a pricing adjustment of around R$4 million. This position is recognized by Resolution No. 16/2014 of the National Council of Supplementary Pensions (CNPC). We mademake contributions to thePBS-TNCPBS-TNCP Plan of less than R$1 millionplan in 2018.the year ended December 31, 2019.

CELPREV Plan

Plan.In March 2004, Amazônia Celular S.A., or Amazônia, a subsidiary of TNCP, began sponsoring the CelPrev Amazônia, or CELPREV plan, a defined contribution plan managed by Sistel. Since January 2016, the CELPREV plan has been managed by FATL. The CELPREV plan was offered to employees of Amazônia who did not participate in thePBS-TNCP plan, as well as to its new employees. Participants in thePBS-TNCP plan were encouraged to migrate to the CELPREV plan. Approximately 27.3% of participants in thePBS-TNCP plan migrated to the CELPREV plan. As of December 31, 2018,2019, the CELPREV plan had a surplusessurplus of R$0.094 million. We madewere not required to make contributions to the CELPREV plan of less than R$1 million in 2018.the year ended December 31, 2019.

TCSPREV Plan

Plan.In December 1999, we and the other companies that participate in the plans managed by Sistel agreed to withdraw sponsorship of these plans and each company agreed to establish its own separate new plan for these participants. In February 2000, we began sponsoring the TCSPREV Plan,plan, a private variable contribution pension plan and settled benefit plan. Approximately 80% of participants in thePBS-A plan migrated to the TSCPREVTCSPREV plan. In March 2005, Fundação 14 de Previdência Privada, or Fundação 14, a privatenot-for-profit pension fund created by Brasil Telecom Holding in 2004 to manage the TSCPREVTCSPREV plan, began managingthe TSCPREVTCSPREV plan. In January 2010, FATL began managingthe TSCPREVTCSPREV plan.

The TCSPREV plan offers three categories of benefits to its members: (1) risk benefits, which are funded according to the defined benefit method; (2) programmable benefits, which are funded according to the defined contribution method; and (3) proportional paid benefits, applicable to those employees who migrated to a defined contribution method with their rights reserved as contributors to the defined benefit system. This plan is closed to new entrants. We are liable for any deficits incurred by the TCSPREV plan according to the existing proportion of the contributions we make to this plan.

In November 2018, the BrTPREV Benefit Planbenefit plan was effectively incorporated bymerged into the TCSPREV Benefit Plan,benefit plan, according to ordinance No.995 of the National Superintendency of Complementary Social Security (Superintendência Nacional dePrevidência Complementar), dated October 24, 2018. With the recognition and registration of the merger, the participants and beneficiaries linked to BrTPREV automatically became participants and beneficiaries of TCSPREV, in accordance with the categories of beneficiaries existing on the day prior to the merger date.

The BrTPREV Planplan is a private defined contribution plan that we began sponsoring in October 2002. Approximately 96% of our active employees that were participants in the Fundador/Alternativo plan (for which we assumed liability in 2000 as a result of our acquisition of CRT—Companhia Riograndense de Telecomunicações) migrated to the BrTPREV plan. The BrTPREV Planplan was offered to our new employees from March 2003 to February 2005, when it was closed to new participants. In 2012, as sponsor of the BrTPREV Plan,plan, Oi entered into a financial obligation agreement with FATL with respect to deficits under the BrTPREV Plan.plan. We remain bound to this financial obligation contract. This obligation iswas classified as a Class I claim under the RJ Plan.

As a result of the RJ Proceedings, certain of our unfunded obligations under our post-retirement plans were novated. As of December 31, 2018,2019, we had recorded R$575 million627 on our balance sheet as “liability for pension benefits, net of provision for unfunded status on our balance sheet, represented by the commitment under the terms of the RJ Plan related to the financial obligations agreement, entered into by Oi and FATL intended for the payment of the mathematical provision without coverage by the plan’s assets.

As of December 31, 2018,2019, the TCSPREV Planplan was balanced. The TCSPREV Plan has a portfolio of federal public securities(NTN-B) until maturity, which enables a price adjustment of approximately R$78 million. This position is recognized by Resolution 16/2014 of the National Council of Supplementary Pensions (CNPC). We made contributions to the incorporated BrTPREV Planplan of less than R$31 million in 2018.the year ended December 31, 2019.

PBS Telemar Plan

PBS-Telemar Plan.In September 2000, Telemar began sponsoring thePBS-Telemar plan, a private defined benefit plan offered to Telemar’s employees. In February 2005, FATL began managing the PBS TelemarPBS-Telemar plan. As a result of the corporate reorganization, we have assumed Telemar’s obligations under thePBS-Telemar plan. ThePBS-Telemar plan has the same characteristics as thePBS-A plan. ThePBS-Telemar plan was closed to new participants in September 2000. We are responsible for any deficits incurred by thePBS-Telemar plan according to the existing proportion of the contributions we make to this plan and those made by participants.

As of December 31, 2018,2019, thePBS-Telemar Planplan had a deficitsurplus of R$6 million. However, thePBS-Telemar Plan holds a portfolio of federal government bonds(NTN-B) carried to maturity, which offsets the deficit. This position, which is recognized by Resolution No. 16/2014 of the National Council of Supplementary Pensions (CNPC), is higher than the deficit recorded, resulting in a positive net result in 2018 of R$30 million.

65million. We made contributions to thePBS-Telemar Planplan of less than R$1 million in of 2018.

the year ended December 31, 2019.

TelemarPrev Plan

Plan.In September 2000, Telemar began sponsoring the TelemarPrev plan, a private variable contribution pension plan. Approximately 96% of participants in thePBS-Telemar plan migrated to the TelemarPrev plan. In February 2005, FATL began managing the TelemarPrev plan. As a result of the corporate reorganization, we have assumed Telemar’s obligations under the TelemarPrev plan.

The TelemarPrev plan offers two categories of benefits to its members: (1) risk benefits, which are funded according to the defined benefit method; and (2) programmable benefits, which are funded according to the defined contribution method. We are liable for any deficits incurred by the TelemarPrev plan according to the proportion of the contributions we make to this plan.

As of December 31, 2018,2019, the TelemarPrev plan had a deficitsurplus of R$468320 million. However, the TelemarPrev plan holds a large portfolio of federal government bonds(NTN-B) carriedWe were not required to maturity, which significantly offsets the deficits. This position, which is recognized by Resolution No. 16/2014 of the National Council of Supplementary Pensions (CNPC), is higher than the deficit recorded, resulting in a positive net result in 2018 of R$105 million.

We mademake contributions to the TelemarPrev Plan of approximately R$24 millionplan in 2018.the year ended December 31, 2019.

Medical, Dental and Employee Assistance Benefits

We provide our employees with medical and dental assistance, pharmacy and prescription drug assistance, group life insurance and meal, food and transportation assistance. We and our employees cover the costs of these benefits on a shared basis. In 2018,2019, we contributed R$270304 million to the medical and dental assistance plans, R$73 million to the occupational medicine plans, R$304333 million for the Worker’s Food Program (Programa de Alimentação do Trabalhador) and R$7988 million to the other benefits programs.

Profit Sharing Plans

The operational targets are part of a profit sharing plan implemented by the Company as an incentive for employees to pursue our goals and to align employees’ interests with those of our shareholders. Profit sharing occurs if financial and operational targets defined annually by our board of directors are achieved. As of December 31, 2018,2019, we had provisioned R$266247 million to be distributed in variable compensation with respect to 2018.2019.

We also have implemented a profit sharing plan as an incentive for employees to pursue our goals and to align employees’ interests with those of our shareholders. Profit sharing occurs if economic operational and financial targets defined annually by our board of directors are achieved.

Education and Training

We contribute to the professional qualification of our employees by offering training for the development of organizational and technical skills. In 2018,2019, we offered approximately 2,776,3164.9 million hours of training and we invested approximately R$1323.5 million in the qualification and training of our employees.

 

ITEM 7.

MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Major Shareholders

Oi has two outstanding classes of share capital: Common Shares and Preferred Shares with no par value. Generally, only Common Shares have voting rights. Preferred Shares have voting rights only in exceptional circumstances. Currently,As of the date of this annual report, Preferred Shares have full voting rights pursuant to Oi’sby-laws as a result of Oi’s failure to make mandatory dividend payments since 2014. For more information, see “Item 8. Financial Information—Dividends and Dividend Policy—Payment of Dividends”Dividend Policy” and “Item 10. Additional Information—Description of Oi’sBy-laws—Voting Rights—Voting Rights of Preferred Shares.”

As of April 23, 2019,24, 2020, Oi had issued 5,954,205,001 total shares, consisting of 5,796,477,760 issued Common Shares and 157,727,241 issued Preferred Shares, including 30,595 Common Shares and 1,811,755 Preferred Shares held in treasury.

As of April 22, 2019,24, 2020, Oi had approximately 1,116,7511.4 million shareholders, including 7051 U.S. resident holders of Common Shares (including the depositary of the Common ADS Depositary)program) and approximately 435 U.S. resident holders of Preferred Shares (including the depositary of the Preferred ADS program). As of January 28, 2019,April 24, 2020, there were 3,897,612,291approximately 1.3 billion Common Shares (including Common Shares represented by ADSs) and 39,060,683approximately 29 million Preferred Shares (including Preferred Shares represented by ADSs) held by U.S. resident holders.

The following table sets forth information concerning the ownership of Common Shares and Preferred Shares as of April 23, 2019,24, 2020, by each person whom we know to be the owner of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of any class of Oi’s share capital, and by all of Oi’s directors and executive officers as a group. Except for the shareholders listed below, we are not aware of any other shareholder holding more than 5% of any class of Oi’s share capital. Oi’s principal shareholders have the same voting rights with respect to each class of Oi’s shares that they own as other holders of shares of that class.

We have not sought to verify any information provided to us by our principal shareholders. The principal shareholders may hold, acquire, sell or otherwise dispose of our Common Shares or Preferred Shares at any time and may have acquired, sold or otherwise disposed of Common Shares or Preferred Shares since the date of the information reflected herein. Other information about our principal shareholders may also change over time.

 

   Common Shares   Preferred Shares   Total 

Name

  Number of
Shares
   % of Shares
Outstanding(1)
   Number of
Shares
   % of Shares
Outstanding(1)
   Number of
Shares
   % of Shares
Outstanding(1)
 

GoldenTree Funds(2)

   865,512,751    14.93    —      —      865,512,751    14.54 

York Funds(3)

   663,027,865    11.44    —      —      663,027,865    11.14 

Brookfield Funds(4)

   531,683,795    9.17    —      —      531,683,795    8.93 

Solus Funds(5)

   428,055,765    7.38    14,145,359    9.07    442,201,124    7.43 

Bratel S.à r.l.(6)

   326,259,859    5.63    1,800,000    1.15    328,059,859    5.51 

All directors, fiscal council members, their alternates and executive officers as a group

   3,984    *     26    *     4,010    *  

   Common Shares   Preferred Shares   Total 

Name

  Number of
Shares
  % of Shares
Outstanding
(1)
   Number of
Shares
  % of Shares
Outstanding
(1)
   Number of
Shares
  % of Shares
Outstanding
(1)
 

Brookfield Funds(2)

   535,308,795   9.24           535,308,795   8.99 

GoldenTree Funds(3)

   317,881,347   5.48           317,881,347   5.34 

Solus Funds(4)

   371,261,320   6.40    14,133,586   9.06    385,394,906   6.47 

Bratel S.à r.l.(5)

   312,827,844   5.40    1,800,000   1.15    314,627,844   5.29 

All directors, fiscal council members and their alternates, and executive officers as a group

   5,910*     24*     5,934 

 

(1)

Based on the number of total shares outstanding (5,952,362,651 shares) as of April 23, 2019,24, 2020, which is the sum of the total number of Common Shares outstanding (5,796,447,165 Common Shares) and the total number of Preferred Shares outstanding (155,915,486 Preferred Shares) as of April 23, 2019.24, 2020.

(2)

Collectively refers to certain funds managed by certain Brookfield Asset Management, Inc.

(3)

GoldenTree Asset Management LP, a Delaware limited partnership, serves as the investment manager or adviser to certain funds and/or accounts, or the GoldenTree Funds, with respect to the Common Shares held by the GoldenTree Funds. GoldenTree Asset Management LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, serves as the general partner to GoldenTree Asset Management LP, and Mr. Steven A. Tananbaum, a United States citizen, serves as the managing member to GoldenTree Asset Management LLC.

(3)

York Global Finance Fund, L.P., or York, is a Cayman limited partnership whose beneficial owners are certain investment funds and accounts, or the York Funds, managed or advised by certain entities controlled by York Capital Management Global Advisors, LLC, a New York limited liability company, or YGA. YGA is the sole senior managing member of the general partner or investment manager, as applicable, of each of the relevant York Funds.

(4)

Collectively refers to certain funds managed by certain Brookfield Asset Management, Inc.

(5)

Solus Alternative Asset Management LP serves as the investment manager or investment subadvisor to certain funds and/or accounts, or the Solus Funds, with respect to the Common Shares and the Preferred Shares held by the Solus Funds. Solus GP LLC is the general partner of Solus Alternative Asset Management LP, and Mr. Christopher Pucillo is the managing member of Solus GP LLC. Each of Solus Alternative Asset Management LP, Solus GP LLC and Mr. Christopher Pucillo may be deemed to have shared voting power and/or shared investment power with respect to the Common Shares and Preferred Shares held by each Solus Fund.

(6)(5)

Bratel S.à r.l., a Luxembourg private limited liability company, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pharol. Excludes 25,614,8318,538,277 Common Shares and 51,229,66217,076,554 Preferred Shares which Pharol has the option to acquire from PTIF in accordance with the PT Option Agreement. All shares subject to the call option are being held in treasury by Oi until the earlier of the exercise or expiration of the call option. See “—PT Option Agreement.”

*

less than 1%

Changes in Share Ownership

Transfer of Shares from Pharol to Bratel S.à r.l.Changes in GoldenTree Shareholding Interest

In May 2016, OiAugust 2018, GoldenTree Asset Management LP, a Delaware limited partnership that serves as the investment manager or adviser to the GoldenTree Funds with respect to the Common Shares held by the GoldenTree Funds, GoldenTree Asset Management LLC, a Delaware limited liability company that serves as the general partner to GoldenTree Asset Management LP, and Mr. Steven A. Tananbaum, a United States citizen, who serves as the managing member to GoldenTree Asset Management LLC, jointly filed a Schedule 13D with the SEC disclosing the GoldenTree Funds’ ownership of 201,823,190 Common Shares as of July 27, 2018, which was equivalent to 9.39% of Oi’s outstanding common stock. Of these, the GoldenTree Funds acquired 187,339,290 Common Shares through their participation in the Capitalization of Credits Capital Increase. In addition, the GoldenTree Funds received 2,645,333 ADWs in the Capitalization of Credits Capital Increase, which they had the right to exercise to acquire 13,226,665 Common Shares.

In November 2018, GoldenTree Asset Management LP, GoldenTree Asset Management LLC, and Mr. Steven A. Tananbaum jointly filed a letter from Pharol informing it that Pharol had transferred its shareholding interestsSchedule 13D/A with the SEC disclosing the GoldenTree Funds’ ownership of 258,592,500 Common Shares as of November 28, 2018, which was equivalent to 11.4% of Oi’s outstanding common stock.

In January 2019, GoldenTree Asset Management LP, GoldenTree Asset Management LLC, and Mr. Steven A. Tananbaum jointly filed a Schedule 13D/A with the SEC disclosing the GoldenTree Funds’ ownership of 593,920,753 Common Shares as of January 16, 2018, which was equivalent to 15.4% of Oi’s outstanding common stock.

In January 2019, the GoldenTree Funds acquired Common Shares through their participation in Oithe preemptive rights offering and pursuant to its wholly-owned subsidiary Bratel B.V.their commitments under the Commitment Agreement.

In April 2019, GoldenTree Asset Management LP, GoldenTree Asset Management LLC, and Mr. Steven A. Tananbaum jointly filed a Schedule 13D/A with the SEC disclosing the GoldenTree Funds’ ownership of 865,512,751 Common Shares as of April 9, 2019, which was equivalent to 14.7% of Oi’s outstanding common stock.

In August 2019, GoldenTree Asset Management LP, GoldenTree Asset Management LLC and Mr. Steven A. Tananbaum jointly filed a Schedule 13D/A with the SEC disclosing the GoldenTree Funds’ ownership of 850,609,751 Common Shares as of August 19, 2019, which was equivalent to 12.8% of Oi’s outstanding common stock

In September 2017, Oi2019, GoldenTree Asset Management LP, GoldenTree Asset Management LLC and Mr. Steven A. Tananbaum jointly filed a Schedule 13D/A with the SEC disclosing the GoldenTree Funds’ ownership of 739,956,951 Common Shares as of September 17, 2019, which was equivalent to 12.8% of Oi’s outstanding common stock.

In January 2020, GoldenTree Asset Management LP, GoldenTree Asset Management LLC and Mr. Steven A. Tananbaum jointly filed a Schedule 13D/A with the SEC disclosing the GoldenTree Funds’ ownership of 567,482,776 Common Shares as of January 24, 2020, which was equivalent to 9.79% of Oi’s outstanding common stock.

In March 2020, GoldenTree Asset Management LP, GoldenTree Asset Management LLC and Mr. Steven A. Tananbaum jointly filed a Schedule 13D/A with the SEC disclosing the GoldenTree Funds’ ownership of 398,881,176 Common Shares as of March 13, 2020, which was equivalent to 6.88% of Oi’s outstanding common stock.

In April 2020, GoldenTree Asset Management LP, GoldenTree Asset Management LLC and Mr. Steven A. Tananbaum jointly filed a Schedule 13D with the SEC disclosing the GoldenTree Funds’ ownership of 317,881,347 Common Shares as of April 23, 2020, which was equivalent to 5.48% of Oi’s outstanding common stock.

Changes in Solus Shareholding Interest

In February 2019, Solus Alternative Asset Management LP, a Delaware limited partnership that serves as the investment manager to the Solus Funds with respect to the Preferred Shares held by the Solus Funds, Solus GP LLC, a Delaware limited liability company that serves as the general partner to Solus Alternative Asset Management LP, and Mr. Christopher Pucillo, a United States citizen, who serves as the managing member to Solus GP LLC, jointly filed a Schedule 13G with the SEC disclosing the Solus Funds’ ownership of 201,230,955 Common Shares, which was equivalent to 8.88% of Oi’s outstanding common stock as of December 31, 2018, and 14,145,359 Preferred Shares, which was equivalent to 9.07% of Oi’s outstanding preferred stock as of December 31, 2018.

In January 2019, the Solus Funds acquired Common Shares through their participation in the preemptive rights offering and pursuant to their commitments under the Commitment Agreement.

In February 2020, Solus Alternative Asset Management LP, Solus GP LLC and Mr. Christopher Pucillo jointly filed a Schedule 13G with the SEC disclosing the Solus Funds’ ownership of 371,261,320 Common Shares which was equivalent to 6.40% of Oi’s outstanding common stock as of December 31, 2019, and 14,133,586 Preferred Shares, which was equivalent to 8.96% of Oi’s outstanding preferred stock as of December 31, 2019.

Changes in Brookfield Shareholding Interest

In September 2018, Brookfield Asset Management, Inc. and certain funds managed by it, or the Brookfield Funds, jointly filed a Schedule 13D with the SEC disclosing the Brookfield Funds’ ownership of 123,396,285 Common Shares as of August 16, 2018, which was equivalent to 5.74% of Oi’s outstanding common stock. Of these, certain of the Brookfield Funds acquired 106,054,035 Common Shares through their participation in the Capitalization of Credits Capital Increase and 17,342,250 Common Shares through open market purchases. In addition, the Brookfield Funds received letters from Bratel B.V. informing it1,515,232 ADWs in the Capitalization of Credits Capital Increase, which they had the right to exercise to acquire 7,576,160 Common ADSs.

In January 2019, Brookfield Asset Management, Inc. and the Brookfield Funds jointly filed a Schedule 13D/A with the SEC disclosing the Brookfield Funds’ ownership of 343,410,230 Common Shares as of January 11, 2019, which was equivalent to 9.0% of Oi’s outstanding common stock, all of which were held in the form of 68,682,046 ADSs, which included Common Shares that Bratel B.V.the Brookfield Funds had transferred its shareholding intereststhe right to acquire through their participation in Oithe preemptive rights offering and pursuant to its wholly-owned subsidiary Bratel S.à r.l.their commitments under the Commitment Agreement.

In January 2019, the Brookfield Funds acquired Common Shares through their participation in the preemptive rights offering and pursuant to their commitments under the Commitment Agreement.

Changes in Bratel Shareholding Interest

As of January 1, 2017, Bratel B.V., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pharol, owned 183,662,204 Common Shares.

On September 15, 2017 and September 29, 2017, Oi received letters from Bratel B.V. informing it that Bratel B.V. had transferred its shareholding interests in Oi to its wholly-owned subsidiary Bratel S.à r.l.

We believe that Bratel S.à r.l. acquired 110,597,655 Common Shares through its participation in the Capitalization of Credits Capital Increase and through open market purchases prior to the settlement of the Pharol Settlement Agreement on April 3, 2019.

In accordance with the Pharol Settlement Agreement, which was confirmed by the RJ Court in a decision that became final on April 3, 2019, Oi transferred to Bratel 32,000,000 Common Shares and 1,800,000 Preferred Shares held in treasury.

AsBased on records that we receive from the B3 related to current holdings of April 23, 2019, according to Oi’s shareholder records,our share capital through the B3, we believe that Bratel owned 326,259,859S.à r.l. has disposed of 13,432,015 Common Shares or 5.63% of Oi’s outstanding common stock, and 1,800,000 Preferred Shares, or 1.15% of Oi’s outstanding preferred stock.

Changes in Solus Shareholding Interest

In February 2018, Solus Alternative Asset Management LP, a Delaware limited partnership that serves as the investment manager to the Solus Funds with respect to the Preferred Shares held by the Solus Funds, Solus GP LLC, a Delaware limited liability company that serves as the general partner to Solus Alternative Asset Management LP, and Mr. Christopher Pucillo, a United States citizen, who serves as the managing member to Solus GP LLC, jointly filed a Schedule 13G with the SEC disclosing the Solus Funds’ ownership of 15,109,224 Preferred Shares as of December 31, 2017, which was equivalent to 9.69% of Oi’s outstanding preferred stock.

In August 2018, Solus Alternative Asset Management LP, Solus GP LLC and Mr. Christopher Pucillo jointly filed a Schedule 13D with the SEC disclosing the Solus Funds’ ownership of 171,284,560 Common Shares (in the form of 34,256,912 Common ADSs), which was equivalent to 7.97% of Oi’s outstanding common stock, and 14,145,359 Preferred Shares (in the form of 14,145,359 Preferred ADSs), which was equivalent to 9.07% of Oi’s outstanding preferred stock, in each case as of July 31, 2018. Of these, the Solus Funds acquired 171,284,560 Common Shares (in the form of 34,256,912 Common ADSs) through their participation in the Capitalization of Credits Capital Increase. In addition, the Solus Funds received 2,447,203 ADWs in the Capitalization of Credits Capital Increase, which they had the right to exercise to acquire 12,236,015 Common Shares ADSs (in the form of 2,447,203 ADSs).

In October 2018, Solus Alternative Asset Management LP, Solus GP LLC and Mr. Christopher Pucillo jointly filed a Schedule 13G/A with the SEC disclosing the Solus Funds’ ownership of 192,520,575 Common Shares (in the form of 36,056,912 Common ADSs and 2,447,203 ADWs), which was equivalent to 8.90% of Oi’s outstanding common stock, and 14,145,359 Preferred Shares (in the form of 14,145,359 Preferred ADSs), which was equivalent to 9.07% of Oi’s outstanding preferred stock, in each case as of October 4, 2018.

As of December 31, 2018, as reported in a Schedule 13G/A jointly filed with the SEC by Solus Alternative Asset Management LP, Solus GP LLC and Mr. Christopher Pucillo, the Solus Funds owned 201,230,955 Common Shares (in the form of 40,246,191 Common ADSs), which was equivalent to 8.88% of Oi’s outstanding common stock as of December 31, 2018, and 14,145,359 Preferred Shares (in the form of 14,145,359 Preferred ADSs), which was equivalent to 9.07% of Oi’s outstanding preferred stock as of December 31, 2018.

In January 2019, the Solus Funds acquired Common Shares (in the form of Common ADSs) through their participation in the preemptive rights offering and pursuant to their commitments under the Commitment Agreement.

As of April 23, 2019, according to Oi’s shareholder records, the Solus Funds owned 428,055,765 Common Shares (in the form of Common ADSs), or 7.38% of Oi’s outstanding common stock, and 14,145,359 Preferred Shares (in the form of 14,145,359 Preferred ADSs), or 9.07% of Oi’s outstanding preferred stock.

Changes in York Shareholding Interest

In July 2018, Oi received a letter from York, a limited partnership formed under the laws of the Cayman Islands with headquarters in the United Kingdom, informing it that as a result of the conclusion of the Capitalization of Credits Capital Increase, York had acquired 173,057,975 Common Shares, which was equivalent to 8.04% of Oi’s outstanding common stock. In addition, York received 2,472,553 ADWs in the Capitalization of Credits Capital Increase, which it had the right to exercise to acquire 12,362,765 Common Shares ADSs (in the form of 2,472,553 ADSs).

In January 2019, the York Funds acquired Common Shares (in the form of Common ADSs) through their participation in the preemptive rights offering and pursuant to their commitments under the Commitment Agreement.

In February 2019, YGA filed a Schedule 13G with the SEC disclosing the York Funds’ ownership of 683,894,340 Common Shares (in the form of 136,778,868 Common ADSs) as of January 31, 2019, which was equivalent to 11.86% of Oi’s outstanding common stock.

As of April 23, 2019, according to Oi’s shareholder records, the York Funds owned 663,027,865 Common Shares (in the form of 132,605,573 Common ADSs), or 11.44% of Oi’s outstanding common stock.

Changes in GoldenTree Shareholding Interest

In August 2018, GoldenTree Asset Management LP, a Delaware limited partnership that serves as the investment manager or adviser to the GoldenTree Funds with respect to the Common Shares held by the GoldenTree Funds, GoldenTree Asset Management LLC, a Delaware limited liability company that serves as the general partner to GoldenTree Asset Management LP, and Mr. Steven A. Tananbaum, a United States citizen, who serves as the managing member to GoldenTree Asset Management LLC, jointly filed a Schedule 13D with the SEC disclosing the GoldenTree Funds’ ownership of 201,823,190 Common Shares as of July 27, 2018, which was equivalent to 9.39% of Oi’s outstanding common stock. Of these, the GoldenTree Funds acquired 187,339,290 Common Shares (in the form of 37,467,858 Common ADSs) through their participation in the Capitalization of Credits Capital Increase. In addition, the GoldenTree Funds received 2,645,333 ADWs in the Capitalization of Credits Capital Increase, which they had the right to exercise to acquire 13,226,665 Common Shares (in the form of 2,645,333 ADSs).

In November 2018, GoldenTree Asset Management LP, a Delaware limited partnership that serves as the investment manager or adviser to the GoldenTree Funds with respect to the Common Shares held by the GoldenTree Funds, GoldenTree Asset Management LLC, a Delaware limited liability company that serves as the general partner to GoldenTree Asset Management LP, and Mr. Steven A. Tananbaum, a United States citizen, who serves as the managing member to GoldenTree Asset Management LLC, jointly filed a Schedule 13D/A with the SEC disclosing the GoldenTree Funds’ ownership of 258,592,500 Common Shares (including 218,569,400 Common Shares in the form of 43,713,880 Common ADSs) as of November 28, 2018, which was equivalent to 11.4% of Oi’s outstanding common stock.

In January 2019, GoldenTree Asset Management LP, a Delaware limited partnership that serves as the investment manager or adviser to the GoldenTree Funds with respect to the Common Shares held by the GoldenTree Funds, GoldenTree Asset Management LLC, a Delaware limited liability company that serves as the general partner to GoldenTree Asset Management LP, and Mr. Steven A. Tananbaum, a United States citizen, who serves as the managing member to GoldenTree Asset Management LLC, jointly filed a Schedule 13D/A with the SEC disclosing the GoldenTree Funds’ ownership of 593,920,753 Common Shares as of January 16, 2018, which was equivalent to 15.4% of Oi’s outstanding common stock (including 486,258,185 Common Shares in the form of 97,251,637 Common ADSs, 54,859,380 Common Shares held directly, 47,239,197 excess Common Shares in the form of 9,447,839 Common ADS to be issued in connection with the overallotment option under the preemptive rights offering and 5,563,991 Common Shares to be issued in connection with overallotment option under the preemptive rights offering).

In January 2019, the GoldenTree Funds acquired Common Shares (directly and in the form of Common ADSs) through their participation in the preemptive rights offering and pursuant to their commitments under the Commitment Agreement.

In April 2019, GoldenTree Asset Management LP, a Delaware limited partnership that serves as the investment manager or adviser to the GoldenTree Funds with respect to the Common Shares held by the GoldenTree Funds, GoldenTree Asset Management LLC, a Delaware limited liability company that serves as the general partner to GoldenTree Asset Management LP, and Mr. Steven A. Tananbaum, a United States citizen, who serves as the managing member to GoldenTree Asset Management LLC, jointly filed a Schedule 13D/A with the SEC disclosing the GoldenTree Funds’ ownership of 865,512,751 Common Shares (including 550,038,310 Common Shares in the form of 110,007,662 Common ADSs) as of April 9, 2018, which was equivalent to 15.0% of Oi’s outstanding common stock.

As of April 23, 2019, according to Oi’s shareholder records, the GoldenTree Funds owned 865,512,751 Common Shares (directly and in the form of Common ADSs), or 14.93% of Oi’s outstanding common stock.

Changes in Brookfield Shareholding Interest

In September 2018, Brookfield Asset Management, Inc. and certain funds managed by it, or the Brookfield Funds, jointly filed a Schedule 13D with the SEC disclosing the Brookfield Funds’ ownership of 123,396,285 Common Shares as of August 16, 2018, which was equivalent to 5.74% of Oi’s outstanding common stock, all of which were held in the form of 24,679,257 ADSs. Of these, certain of the Brookfield Funds acquired 106,054,035 Common Shares (in the form of 21,210,807 Common ADSs) through their participation in the Capitalization of Credits Capital Increase and 17,342,250 Common Shares (in the form of 3,468,450 Common ADSs) through open market purchases. In addition,purchases since the Brookfield Funds received 1,515,232 ADWs in the Capitalization of Credits Capital Increase, which they had the right to exercise to acquire 7,576,160 Common Shares ADSs (in the form of 1,515,232 ADSs).

In January 2019, Brookfield Asset Management, Inc. and the Brookfield Funds jointly filed a Schedule 13D/A with the SEC disclosing the Brookfield Funds’ ownership of 343,410,230 Common Shares as of January 11, 2019, which was equivalent to 9.0% of Oi’s outstanding common stock, all of which were held in the form of 68,682,046 ADSs.

In January 2019, the Brookfield Funds acquired Common Shares (in the form of Common ADSs) through their participation in the preemptive rights offering and pursuant to their commitments under the Commitment Agreement.

As of April 23, 2019, according to Oi’s shareholder records, the Brookfield Funds owned 531,683,795 Common Shares (in the form of Common ADSs), or 9.17% of Oi’s outstanding common stock.

Changes in Mare Finance Shareholding Interest

On March 6, 2019, Oi received a letter from Mare Finance Investment Holdings Designated Activity Company, or Mare Fianance, a company formed under the laws of Ireland, informing Oi that Mare Finance had sold 1,264,500 Preferred Shares, reducing its shareholding in Oi to below 5%.

As of April 23, 2019, according to Oi’s shareholder records, Mare Finance does not hold any Common Shares or Preferred Shares.

Capitalization of Credits Capital Increase

Under the RJ Plan, Qualified Holders of the Defaulted Bonds were entitled to elect to receive the Qualified Recovery with respect to their beneficial interests in the Defaulted Bonds. The Qualified Recovery included, among other things, (1) 302,846,268 new Common ADSs (representing 1,514,231,340 newly issued Common Shares), (2) 23,250,281 Common ADSs previously held by PTIF (representing 116,251,405 Common Shares), and (3) 23,295,054 ADWs representing the right to subscribe for 23,295,054 newly issued Common ADSs (representing 116,475,270 Common Shares). The settlement of the Qualified Recovery took placePharol Settlement Agreement on July 27, 2018.

Under Brazilian law, prior to issuing the Common Shares underlying the newly issued Common ADSs or the Warrants underlying the newly issued ADWs to holders of Defaulted Bonds, Oi was required to conduct a preemptive offer of those Common Shares and Warrants to all holders of its Common Share and Preferred Shares. Holders of Common ADSs and Preferred ADSs were not entitled to participate in that preemptive offer. Holders of preemptive rights were entitled to subscribe to Common Shares and the associated Warrants during a subscription period commencing on June 15, 2018 and ending on July 16, 2018 at a subscription price of R$7.00 per Common Share. Holders of Common Shares and Preferred Shares subscribed for 68,263 Common Shares and 5,197 Warrants in the preemptive offer. The cash proceeds of the preemptive offer were required to be made available to holders of Defaulted Bonds in lieu of the subscribed Common Shares and Warrants.

For more information about the Qualified Recovery, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—Our Recent History and Development—Our Judicial Reorganization Proceedings—Implementation of the Financial Settlement of the Judicial Reorganization Plan —Settlement of Class III Claims – Defaulted Bonds—Qualified Recovery.”

As a result of the conclusion of the Capitalization of Credits Capital Increase, the ownership interest of our then-existing shareholders who did not participate in the preemptive offer was diluted. For more information about the owners of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of any class of Oi’s share capital as of April 23, 2019, see “—Major Shareholders.”

Exercise of Warrants and ADWs

On October 26, 2018, our board of directors confirmed the issuance of 112,598,610 Common Shares and the delivery of such Common Shares to holders of its Warrants that exercised their Warrants on or prior to October 24, 2018, including Warrants represented by 22,135,429 ADWs that were exercised on or prior to October 18, 2018.

On December 5, 2018, our board of directors confirmed the issuance of 3,314,745 Common Shares and the delivery of such Common Shares to holders of its Warrants that exercised their Warrants from October 25, 2018 through December 3, 2018, including Warrants represented by 662,949 ADWs that were exercised from October 19, 2018 through November 27, 2018.

On January 4, 2019, our board of directors confirmed the issuance of 275,985 Common Shares and the delivery of such Common Shares to holders of its Warrants that exercised their Warrants from December 4, 2018 through January 2, 2019, including Warrants represented by 55,197 ADWs that were exercised from November 28, 2018 through December 26, 2018.

All Warrants that were not exercised on or prior to January 2, 2019, including all ADWs that were not exercised on or prior to December 26, 2018, have been cancelled.

Preemptive Offering and Commitment Agreement

As contemplated by Section 6 of the RJ Plan, on November 13, 2018, we commenced a preemptive offering of Common Shares that was registered with the SEC under the Securities Act under which holders of our Common Shares and Preferred Shares, including the ADS Depositary and The Bank of New York Mellon, as depositary of the Preferred ADS program, received 1.333630 transferable rights for each Common Share or Preferred Share held as of November 19, 2018. Each subscription right entitled its holder to subscribe to one Common Share at a subscription price of R$1.24 per Common Share. In addition, each holder of a subscription right was entitled to request the subscription for additional Common Shares, up to the total of 3,225,806,451 Common Shares that were offered in the preemptive offering less the total number of initial Common Shares.

The subscription rights expired on January 4, 2019. On January 16, 2019, we issued 1,530,457,356 Common Shares to holders of subscription rights that had exercised those subscription rights with respect to the initial Common Shares, including the depositaries under the deposit agreements relating to our ADSs. On January 21, 2019, we issued 91,080,933 Common Shares to holders of subscription rights that had requested subscriptions for excess Common Shares, including the depositaries under the deposit agreements relating to our ADSs. The proceeds of these subscriptions was R$2,011 million.

On January 25, 2019, we issued 1,604,268,162 Common Shares, representing the total number of Common Shares that were offered in the preemptive offering less the total number of initial Common Shares and excess Common Shares, to the Backstop Investors in a private placement under the terms of the RJ Plan and the Commitment Agreement for the aggregate amount of R$1,989 million. In addition, under the terms of the RJ Plan and the Commitment Agreement, on that date we issued 272,148,705 Common Shares in a private placement to the Backstop Investors and paid US$13 million to the Backstop Investors as compensation for their commitments under the Commitment Agreement.

PT Option Agreement

In May 2014, Oi completed a capital increase in which it issued, among other things 104,580,393 Common Shares and 172,025,273 of Preferred Shares to Pharol in exchange for the contribution by Pharol to Oi of all of the outstanding shares of PT Portugal. However, prior to this capital increase, Pharol’s then wholly-owned subsidiaries PTIF and PT Portugal subscribed to an aggregate of €897 million principal amount of commercial paper of Rio Forte that matured in July 2014. As a result of our acquisition of PT Portugal as part of the Oi capital increase, we became the creditor under this commercial paper.

On July 15 and 17, 2014, Rio Forte defaulted on the commercial paper held by PTIF and PT Portugal. On September 8, 2014, we, TmarPart, Pharol and our subsidiaries PT Portugal and PTIF, entered into the PT Exchange Agreement and a stock option agreement, or the PT Option Agreement.

On March 24, 2015, PT Portugal assigned its rights and obligations under the PT Exchange Agreement and the PT Option Agreement to PTIF. On March 27, 2015, PT Portugal assigned the Rio Forte commercial paper that it owned to PTIF. Under the PT Exchange Agreement, on March 30, 2015, we transferred the defaulted Rio Forte commercial paper to Pharol and Pharol delivered to us an aggregate of 47,434,872 Common Shares and 94,869,744 Preferred Shares, representing 16.9% of Oi’s outstanding share capital, including 17.1% of Oi’s outstanding voting capital prior to giving effect to the PT Exchange. Under Brazilian law, these shares are deemed to be held in treasury.

Under the PT Option Agreement, PTIF granted to Pharol an option, or the PT Option, to acquire 47,434,872 Common Shares and 94,869,744 Preferred Shares. Pharol is entitled to exercise the PT Option in whole or in part, at any time prior to March 31, 2021. The number of shares subject to the PT Option is reduced on each March 31 such that:

 

100% was available until March 31, 2016;

 

90% was available between March 31, 2016 and March 31, 2017;

 

72% was available between March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2018;

 

54% will be available between March 31, 2018 and March 31, 2019;

 

36% will be available between March 31, 2019 and March 31, 2020; and

 

18% will be available between March 31, 2020 and March 31, 2021, in each case, less the number of shares with respect to the PT Option has been previously exercised. As of January 28, 2019, Pharol had not exercised the PT Option with respect to any of Oi’s shares and, as a result, the option over 21,820,041 Common Shares and 43,640,082

18% will be available between March 31, 2020 and March 31, 2021,

in each case, less the number of shares with respect to the PT Option has been previously exercised. As of March 31, 2020, Pharol had not exercised the PT Option with respect to any of Oi’s shares and, as a result, the option over 38,896,595 Common Shares and 77,793,190 of Preferred Shares has lapsed. The exercise prices under the PT Option are R$20.104 per Common Share and R$18.529 per Preferred Share, in each case as adjusted by the CDI rateplus 1.5% per annum, calculatedpro rata temporis, from March 31, 2015 to the date of the effective payment of the exercise price.

Oi is not required to maintain the shares subject to the PT Option in treasury. In the event that, at the time of exercise of the PT Option, PTIF and/or any of Oi’s other subsidiaries do not hold, in treasury, the number of shares with respect to which Pharol exercises the PT Option, the PT Option may be financially settled through payment by PTIF of the amount corresponding to the difference between the market price of the shares and the exercise price corresponding to these shares.

We may terminate the PT Option if (1) theby-laws of Pharol are amended to remove or amend the provision of thoseby-laws that limits the voting right to 10% of all votes corresponding to the capital stock of Pharol, except if this removal or amendment is required by law or by order of a competent governmental authority; (2) Pharol directly or indirectly engages in activities that compete with the activities Oi or Oi’s subsidiaries in the countries in which we or they operate; or (3) Pharol violates certain obligations under the PT Option Agreement.

Prior to the earlier of the expiration or full exercise of the PT Option, Pharol may not purchase shares of Oi, directly or indirectly, in any manner other than by exercising the PT Option. If the PT Option is exercised, Pharol will undertake its best efforts to integrate the shareholder bases of Pharol and Oi in the shortest time possible.

Pharol may not directly or indirectly transfer or assign the PT Option, in whole or in part, nor grant any rights under the PT Option, including any security interest in the PT Option or the shares underlying the PT Option, without the consent of Oi. If Pharol issues, directly or indirectly, any derivative instrument that is backed by or references Oi’s shares, it shall immediately use all proceeds derived directly or indirectly from such derivative instrument to acquire shares pursuant to the exercise of the PT Option.

On March 31, 2015, we, Pharol and PTIF entered into an amendment to the PT Option Agreement. Under this amendment, (1) Pharol will be permitted to assign the PT Option to a third party provided that such assignment involves at leastone-quarter of Oi’s shares subject to the PT Option, and (2) Pharol has granted Oi a right of first refusal exercisable prior to any such assignment. This amendment does not affect the agreement of Pharol not to grant any rights under the PT Option, including any security interest in the PT Option or the shares underlying the PT Option, without the consent of Oi, or the requirement that Pharol use all proceeds derived directly or indirectly from the issuance of any derivative instrument that is backed by or references Oi’s shares to acquire shares pursuant to the exercise of the PT Option.

The effectiveness of the amendment to the PT Option Agreement was subject to (1) the authorization of the amended terms by the CVM, and (2) the approval of the amendment to the PT Option Agreement by a general meeting of Oi’s shareholders at which holders of the Common Shares and Preferred Shares will be entitled to vote. However, in December 2015, the CVM collegiate declined to authorize the amended terms, as a result of which this amendment has no effect.

Related Party Transactions

The following summarizes the material transactions that we have engaged in with Oi’s principal shareholders and their affiliates since January 1, 2018.2019.

Under the Brazilian Corporate Law, Oi’s directors their alternates and Oi’s executive officers cannot vote on any matter in which they have a conflict of interest and such transactions can only be approved on reasonable and fair terms and conditions that are no more favorable than the terms and conditions prevailing in the market or offered by third parties. However, if one of Oi’s directors is absent from a meeting of Oi’s board of directors, that director’s alternate may vote even if that director has a conflict of interest, unless the alternate director shares that conflict of interest or has another conflict of interest.

Transactions with Hispamar

We own 19% of the capital stock of Hispamar. We lease transponders on the Amazonas 3 satellite from Hispamar, which we use to provide voice and data services. During 2018,2019, our total consolidated expenses under the lease agreements amounted to R$207203 million. As of December 31, 2018,2019, we had accounts payable to Hispamar of R$6750 million.

Transactions with AIX

Companhia AIX de Participações S.A., in which we own 50% of the outstanding share capital, renders services to us relating to the rental of ducts for transmission of traffic originated outside our local network in our service areas. During 2018,2019, our total consolidated expenses for services rendered by AIX amounted to R$2721 million.

 

ITEM 8.

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information

Reference is made to Item 19 for a list of all financial statements filed as part of this annual report.

Legal Proceedings

We are a party to certain legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business, including civil, administrative, tax, social security, labor, government and arbitration proceedings. We classify our risk of loss in legal proceedings as “remote,” “possible” or “probable,” and we only record provisions for reasonably estimable probable losses, as determined by our management.

As a result of the RJ Proceedings (which are considered to be similar in all substantive respects to proceedings under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code), we have applied ASC 852 in preparing our audited consolidated financial statements. ASC 852 requires that financial statements separately disclose and distinguish transactions and events that are directly associated with our reorganization from transactions and events that are associated with the ongoing operations of our business. Accordingly, certain expenses, realized gains and losses, and provisions for losses that are realized or incurred in the RJ Proceedings have been recorded under the classification “Reorganization items, net” in our consolidated statements of operations. In addition, our prepetition obligations that may be impacted by the RJ Proceedings based on our assessment of these obligations following the guidance of ASC 852 have been classified on our consolidated statement of financial position as “Liabilities subject to compromise.” Prepetition liabilities subject to compromise are required to be reported as the amount allowed as a claim by the RJ Court, regardless of whether they may be settled for lesser amounts. Certain amounts initially recorded as liabilities subject to compromise were adjusted and reclassified to reflect new legal terms and conditions established by the RJ Court. As a result of the effectiveness of the RJ Plan on February 5, 2018, the contingencies included as “Liabilities subject to compromise” on our consolidated statement of financial position will be paid according to the terms of the RJ Plan and were reclassified as current andnon-current “Provisions for contingencies” on our consolidated statement of financial position. As of December 31, 2018,2019, the total estimated amount in controversy for those proceedings in respect of which the risk of loss was deemed probable or possible totaled R$35,11936,134 million, and we had established provisions of R$5,0395,252 million relating to these proceedings. Our provisions for legal contingencies are subject to monthly monetary adjustments. For a detailed description of our provisions for contingencies, see note 1924 to our audited consolidated financial statements.

In certain instances, we are required to make judicial deposits or post financial guarantees with the applicable judicial bodies. As of December 31, 2018,2019, we had made judicial deposits in the aggregate amount of R$8,7358,166 million, and obtained financial guarantees from third parties in the aggregate amount of R$13,75111,910 million. During 2018,2019, we paid fees in the aggregate amount of R$313251 million to the financial institutions from which we had obtained these guarantees, and as of December 31, 2018,2019, we had pledged 1,811,755 Preferred Shares, representing 1.15% of our outstanding share capital, as security for one of these financial guarantees.

Tax Proceedings

As of December 31, 2018,2019, the total estimated contingency in connection with tax proceedings against us in respect of which the risk of loss was deemed probable or possible totaled R$28,23629,467 million, and we had recorded provisions of R$6501,051 million relating to these proceedings. In accordance with Brazilian law, our tax contingencies are not subject to the RJ Plan.

The Brazilian corporate tax system is complex, and as of the date of this annual report, we are currently involved in tax proceedings regarding, and have filed claims to avoid payment of, certain taxes that we believe are unconstitutional. These tax contingencies, which relate primarily to value-added tax, service tax and taxes on revenue, are described in detail in note 1924 to our audited consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. We record provisions for probable losses in connection with these claims based on an analysis of potential results, assuming a combination of litigation and settlement strategies. We currentlyAs of the date of this annual report, we do not believe that the proceedings that we consider as probable losses, if decided against us, will have a material adverse effect on our financial position. It is possible, however, that our future results of operations could be materially affected by changes in our assumptions and the effectiveness of our strategies with respect to these proceedings.

Value-Added State Taxes (ICMS)

Under the regulations governing the ICMS, in effect in all Brazilian states, telecommunications companies must pay ICMS on every transaction involving the sale of telecommunications services they provide. We may record ICMS credits for each of our purchases of operational assets. The ICMS regulations allow us to apply the credits we have recorded for the purchase of operational assets to reduce the ICMS amounts we must pay when we sell our services.

We have received various tax assessments challenging the amount of tax credits that we recorded to offset the ICMS amounts we owed. Most of the tax assessments are based on two main issues: (1) whether ICMS is due on those services subject to the Local Service Tax (Imposto Sobre Serviços de Qualquer Natureza), or ISS; and (2) whether some of the assets we have purchased are related to the telecommunications services provided, and, therefore, eligible for an ICMS tax credit. A small part of the assessments that are considered to have a probable risk of loss are related to: (1) whether certain revenues are subject to ICMS tax or ISS tax; (2) offset and usage of tax credits on the purchase of goods and other materials, including those necessary to maintain the network; and (3) assessments related tonon-compliance with certain ancillary(non-monetary) obligations.

As of December 31, 2018,2019, we deemed the risk of loss as possible with respect to approximately R$12,52313,470 million of these assessments and had not recorded any provisions in respect of these assessments. As of December 31, 2018,2019, we had recorded provisions in the amount of R$503746 million for those assessments in respect of which we deemed the risk of loss as probable.

Local Service Tax (ISS)

We have received various tax assessments claiming that we owe ISS taxes on supplementary services. We have challenged these assessments on the basis that ISS taxes should not be applied to supplementary services (such as, among others things, equipment leasing and technical and administrative services) provided by telecommunications service providers, because these services do not clearly fit into the definition of “telecommunications services.”

As of December 31, 2018,2019, we deemed the risk of loss as possible with respect to approximately R$3,5052,840 million of these assessments and had not recorded any provisions in respect of these assessments. As of December 31, 2018,2019, we had recorded provisions in the amount of R$7669 million for those assessments in respect of which we deemed the risk of loss as probable.

FUST and FUNTTEL

The FUST is a fund that was established to promote the expansion of telecommunications services tonon-commercially viable users. The FUNTTEL was established to finance telecommunications technology research. We are required to make contributions to the FUST and the FUNTTEL. Due to a change by ANATEL in the basis for calculation of our contributions to the FUST and the FUNTTEL, we made provisions for additional contributions to the FUST and TNL made provisions for additional contributions to the FUST and the FUNTTEL. With respect to the calculation of the contribution to the FUST, the Brazilian Association ofFixed-Line Companies(Associação Brasileira das Empresas de Telefonia Fixa) of which we are members, filed a lawsuit to request a review of the applicable legislation.

As of December 31, 2018,2019, we deemed the risk of loss as possible with respect to approximately R$4,7855,134 million of these assessments and had not recorded any provisions in respect of these assessments. As of December 31, 2019, we had recorded provisions in the amount of R$5 million for those assessments in respect of which we deemed the risk of loss as probable.

Contributions to the INSS

Pursuant to Brazilian social security legislation, companies must pay contributions to the National Social Security Institute (Instituto Nacional do Seguro Social), or INSS, based on their payroll. In the case of outsourced services, the contracting parties must, in certain circumstances, withhold the social contribution due from the third-party service providers and pay the retained amounts to the INSS. In other cases, the parties are jointly and severally liable for contributions to the INSS. Assessments have been filed against us primarily relating to claims regarding joint and several liability and claims regarding the percentage to be used to calculate workers’ compensation benefits and other amounts subject to social security tax.

As of December 31, 2018,2019, we deemed the risk of loss as possible with respect to approximately R$695650 million of these assessments. As of December 31, 2018,2019, we had recorded provisions of R$2324 million for those assessments in respect of which we deemed the risk of loss as probable.

PIS and COFINS

In 2006, the Brazilian federal tax authorities filed a claim in the amount of R$1,026 million related to the basis for the calculation of PIS/COFINS. In 2007, TNL obtained a partially favorable decision in a lower court that reduced the amount of this claim to R$585 million. Both TNL and the Brazilian federal tax authorities filed appeals, with respect to which decisions are pending. As of December 31, 2018,2019, we deemed the risk of loss as possible with respect to approximately R$2,4902,136 million of these assessments and had not recorded any provisions in respect of this claim.these assessments. As of December 31, 2019, we had recorded provisions of R$23 million for those assessments in respect of which we deemed the risk of loss as probable.

Other Tax Claims

There are various federal taxes that have been assessed against us, largely relating to (1) assessments of taxes against our company that we do not believe are due and which we are contesting, and (2) our use of tax credits to offset certain federal taxes, which the federal tax authorities are contesting.

As of December 31, 2018,2019, we deemed the risk of loss as possible with respect to approximately R$4,2824,186 million of these assessments. As December 31, 2018,2019, we had recorded provisions in the amount of R$47184 million for those assessments in respect of which we deemed the risk of loss as probable.

Civil Claims Relating to Oi S.A. and Our Brazilian Operations

As of December 31, 2018,2019, the total estimated contingency in connection with civil claims against us in respect of which the risk of loss was deemed probable or possible, totaled R$4,6553,818 million, and we had recorded provisions of R$2,9312,150 million relating to these proceedings.

Administrative Proceedings

On an almost weekly basis, we receive inquiries from ANATEL requiring information from us on our compliance with the various service obligations imposed on us by our concession agreements. If we are unable to respond satisfactorily to those inquiries or comply with our service obligations under our concession agreements, ANATEL may commence administrative proceedings in connection with such noncompliance. We have received numerous notices of commencement of administrative proceedings from ANATEL, mostly due to our inability to achieve certain targets established in the PGMQRGQ and the PGMU.

At the time that ANATEL notifies us it believes that we have failed to comply with our obligations, we evaluate the claim and, based on our assessment of the probability of loss relating to that claim, may establish a provision. We vigorously contest a substantial number of the assessments made against us.

As a result of the commencement of the RJ Proceedings, our contingencies related to claims of ANATEL were reclassified liabilities subject to compromise and were measure as required by ASC 852. As of December 31, 2017, our prepetition liabilities subject to compromise included R$9,334 million related with claims of ANATEL. As a result of the effectiveness of the RJ Plan on February 5, 2018, the contingencies related to these claims were provisions for contingencies.

As of December 31, 2018, we have reclassified R$8,754 million of civil contingencies related to claims of ANATEL that were classified as liabilities subject to compromise of as of December 31, 2017 as trade payables owing toANATEL-AGU of R$2,063 million on our balance sheet and we recorded reorganization items in our statement of operations of (1) R$4,873 million as a result of the adjustment to present value of our trade payables owing toANATEL-AGU, (2) R$1,654 million as a gain on restructuring as a result of the RJ Proceedings, and (3) financial charges on our statement of operations of R$164 million.

As of December 31, 2018,2019, we had recorded provisions in the amount of R$580570 million with respect to these claims.

By operation of the RJ Plan and the Brazilian Confirmation Order, the claim for these contingent obligations has been novated and discharged under Brazilian law and ANATEL is entitled only to receive the recovery set forth in the RJ Plan in exchange for these contingent claims in accordance with the terms and conditions of the RJ Plan. For more information regarding the recoveries to which ANATEL is entitled under the RJ Plan, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—Our Recent History and Development—Our Judicial Reorganization Proceedings—Implementation of the Financial Settlement of the Judicial Reorganization Plan—Settlement of Class III Claims – ANATEL.”

Brazilian Antitrust Proceedings

We are subject to administrative proceedings and preliminary investigations conducted by the Brazilian antitrust authorities with respect to potential violations of the Brazilian antitrust law. Such investigations may result in penalties, including fines. During 2016, 2017 and 2018 to date,2019, no fines or penalties have beenwere levied against us. We deemed the risk of loss as possible that we will be fined in one or more of such proceedings and have not recorded any provisions for those claims.

Financial Interest Agreements (PEX and PCT)

Prior to the privatization of Telebrás, users of fixed-line telephony services in Brazil were required to purchase the right to use fixed telephone lines. These purchases could be made through two types of financial interest agreements: (1) Plan of Expansion (Plano de Expansão), or PEX, contracts; and (2) Community Telephone ProgramsProgram (Planta Comunitária de Telefonia), or PCT, contracts. Under PEX contracts, customers who purchased a telephone line acquired the right subscribe for a number of a telephone company’s shares. Under the PCT program, users who purchased a telephone line acquired a participation in an association formed by a local community that subcontracted the construction or expansion of necessary infrastructure, which was then sold to the telephone company, in exchange for shares of the company. The number of shares to be issued to each user was determined based on a formula that divided the contract value by the book value of the shares.

We are a defendant in several claims filed by users of telephone lines in the State of Rio Grande do Sul. Prior to our acquisition of control of CRT in July 2000, CRT entered into PEX contracts with itsfixed-line subscribers. Beginning in June 1997, certain of CRT’sfixed-line subscribers began to file suits in which they claimed that the calculation used by CRT to arrive at the number of shares to be issued pursuant to the financial interest agreements was incorrect and resulted in the claimants receiving too few shares.

In addition, as successor to various companies we acquired in the privatization of Telebrás and which were subsequently merged into our company, we are subject to various civil claims filed by PCT participants who also disagree with the value of their shares in those companies and who seek to recover the amounts they invested.

In 2009, two court decisions significantly changed the assumptions underlying our estimate of the potential losses relating to these suits. In March 2009, the Brazilian Supreme Court published a decision ruling that the financial interest agreements are subject to the twenty-year statute of limitations prescribed by the Brazilian Civil Code, as opposed to the three-year statute of limitations prescribed by the Brazilian Corporate Law. This decision increased the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome in a greater number of these pending cases than previously anticipated. Also in March 2009, the Superior Court of Justice ruled that the number of shares to be issued must be calculated using the book value of the shares listed on company’s balance sheet at the end of the first month in which the shares were issued.

As of December 31, 2018,2019, we had recorded provisions in the amount of R$1,124398 million for those claims in respect of which we deemed the risk of loss as probable.

Customer Service Centers

We are a defendant in 4447 civil class actions filed by the Attorney General of the National Treasury jointly with certain consumer agencies demanding there-opening of customer service centers. The lower courts have rendered decisions in all of these proceedings, some of which have been unfavorable to us. AllAs of the date of this annual report, all of these proceedings are currently under appeal. As of December 31, 2018,2019, we had recorded provisions in the amount of R$10.216.6 million for those claims in respect of which we deemed the risk of loss as probable.

Customer Service

We are a defendant in a civil class action lawsuit filed by the Brazilian Federal Prosecutor’s Office (Ministério PúblicoFederal)seekingOfficeseeking recovery for alleged collective moral damages caused by TNL’s allegednon-compliance with the Customer Service (Serviço de Atendimento ao ConsumidorSAC)regulations established by the Ministry of Justice (Ministério da Justiça). TNL presented its defense and asked for a change of venue to federal court in Rio de Janeiro, where we are headquartered. Other defendants have been named and await service of process. The amount involved in this action is R$300 million. As a result of a corporate reorganization in 2012, we have succeeded to TNL’s position as a defendant in this action. As of December 31, 2018,2019, we deemed the risk of loss as possible with respect to these lawsuits and had not made any provisions with respect to this action since it was awaiting the court’s initial decision.

Special Civil Court Proceedings

We are party to proceedings in special civil courts relating to customer claims in connection with our basic subscription services. The value of any individual claim does not exceed 40 minimum wages. As of December 31, 2018,2019, we had recorded provisions in the amount of R$192119 million for these claims in respect of which we deemed the risk of loss as probable.

Other Claims

We are defendants in various claims involving contract termination, indemnification of former suppliers and contractors, review of contractual conditions due to economic stabilization plans and breach of contract. As of December 31, 2018,2019, we had recorded provisions in the amount of R$1,0351,063 million in respect of these claims.

Labor Claims Relating to Oi S.A. and Our Brazilian Operations

We are a party to a large number of labor claims arising out of the ordinary course of our businesses. We do not believe any of these claims, individually or in the aggregate would have a material effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations if such claims are decided against us. These proceedings generally involve claims for: (1) risk premium payments sought by employees working in dangerous conditions; (2) wage parity claims seeking equal pay among employees who do the same kind of work, within a given period of time, and have the same productivity and technical performance; (3) indemnification payments for, among other things, work accidents, occupational injuries, employment stability, child care allowances and achievement of productivity standards set forth in our collective bargaining agreements; (4) overtime wages; and (5) joint liability allegations by employees ofthird-party service providers.

As of December 31, 2018,2019, the total estimated contingency in connection with labor claims against us in respect of which the risk of loss was deemed probable or possible totaled R$2,2282,849 million, and we had recorded provisions of R$1,4572,051 million relating to these proceedings.

Legal Proceedings Relating to Our Interest in Unitel

On October 13, 2015, PT Ventures initiated an arbitration proceeding against the other Unitel shareholders as a result of the violation by those shareholders of a variety of provisions of the Unitel shareholders’ agreement and Angolan law, including the provisions entitling PT Ventures to nominate the majority of the members of the board of directors of Unitel, including its managing director, and the fact that the other Unitel shareholders caused Unitel not to pay dividends owed to PT Ventures, entered into self-interested transactions, and withheld information and clarifications on such payment and transactions.

On March 14, 2016, the other shareholders of Unitel initiated an arbitration proceeding against PT Ventures, claiming that Pharol’s sale of a minority interest in Africatel to our company in May 2014 constituted a breach of the Unitel shareholders’ agreement. PT Ventures disputed this interpretation of the relevant provisions of the Unitel shareholders’ agreement arguing that the relevant provisions of the Unitel shareholders’ agreement apply only to a transfer of Unitel shares by PT Ventures itself.

The arbitral tribunal was constituted on April 14, 2016. On May 19, 2016, the arbitration proceeding against PT Ventures initiated by the other Unitel shareholders was consolidated with the arbitration initiated by PT Ventures. On October 14, 2016, PT Ventures filed its Statement of Claim in the arbitration and the Unitel shareholders presented their statement of defense and counterclaim on February 28, 2017. PT Ventures presented its statement of reply on July 7, 2017 and the other shareholders of Unitel presented their statement of rejoinder on October 16, 2017. PT Ventures filed its statement of rejoinder to the counterclaim on December 19, 2017. A hearing in the arbitration was held from February 7 to 16, 2018, where each party presented its arguments and the factual witnesses and experts from each side were heard. A closing hearing was held on May 9, 2018. The parties exchanged their first post-hearing briefs on July 13, 2018 and their second post-hearing briefs on October 1, 2018. The parties submitted their statements of costs on November 12, 2018. PT Ventures and two other Unitel shareholders filed their responses to the statement of costs on November 28, 2018.

On January 21, 2019, the arbitral tribunal declared the proceeding closed and informed the parties that it had agreed on a draft of the final award which would be submitted to the ICC Court of Arbitration for approval. The ICC Court of Arbitration approved the draft of the final award on February 6, 2019. On February 27, 2019, the ICC Secretariat informed the parties that the arbitral tribunal issued its final award on February 20, 2019.

In the final award, the arbitral tribunal decided that the other Unitel shareholders had repeatedly breached the shareholders’ agreement, and that these breaches had resulted in a significant decrease of value of PT Ventures’ stake in Unitel. The arbitral tribunal ordered the other Unitel shareholders to jointly and severally pay PT Ventures the amount of US$339.4 million corresponding to the loss of value of PT Ventures’ stake in Unitel, plus interest from February 20, 2019 at12-month U.S. dollar LIBOR +2%, compounded annually. The arbitral tribunal also ordered the other Unitel shareholders to jointly and severally pay PT Ventures the amount of US$307 million corresponding to the damages arising from the other Unitel’s shareholders’ failure to ensure that PT Ventures received the same amount of dividends in foreign currency as the other Unitel foreign shareholder. This amount is subject to interest at an annual rate of 7%, starting at various dates in 2013. In addition, the arbitral tribunal ordered the other Unitel shareholders to pay a substantial portion of PT Ventures’ legal fees and costs and the administrative and arbitrators’ fees and expenses, in the aggregate net amount of approximately US$13 million. The arbitral tribunal also entirely dismissed the counterclaim and agreed with PT Ventures that the conditions for exercising the right of first refusal to acquire PT Ventures’ 25% shareholding in Unitel had not been triggered.

Legal Proceedings Relating to Our Financial Restructuring

Judicial Reorganization Proceedings

On June 20, 2016, Oi, together with the other RJ Debtors, filed a joint voluntary petition for judicial reorganization pursuant to the Brazilian Bankruptcy Law with the RJ Court, pursuant an urgent measure approved by our board of directors.

On December 20, 2017, the RJ Plan was approved by a significant majority of creditors of each class present at thea GCM. On January 8, 2018, the RJ Court entered the Brazilian Confirmation Order, ratifying and confirming the RJ Plan, but modifying certain provisions of the RJ Plan. The Brazilian Confirmation Order was published in the Official Gazette of the State of Rio de Janeiro on February 5, 2018.2018, the Brazilian Confirmation Date.

For more information regardingDuring 2018, the restructuring of the RJ Debtor’s financial debt in accordance with the applicable terms and conditions set forth in the RJ Plan was concluded.

Extension of the Judicial Reorganization Proceedings

The Brazilian Bankruptcy Law provides that the RJ Proceedings see “Item 4. Informationand the judicial supervision of the RJ Debtors may be terminated on the Company—Our Recent Historysecond anniversary of the Brazilian Confirmation Date if the RJ Court determines that all obligations provided for in the RJ Plan have been satisfied based on the analysis of compliance with the RJ Plan.

On December 6, 2019, we filed a petition with the RJ Court requesting that the judicial supervision of the RJ Debtors not be terminated on February 5, 2020, the second anniversary of the Brazilian Confirmation Date, in order to allow us to continue to execute the RJ Plan and Development—Ourremain focused on our strategic transformation. Notwithstanding the conclusion of the restructuring of the RJ Debtor’s financial debt in accordance with the applicable terms and conditions set forth in the RJ Plan, we presented to the RJ Court circumstances related to the complexity inherent to the magnitude of the RJ Proceedings and the ongoing reforms in the legal-regulatory environment, which we believe require additional measures yet to be implemented under the RJ Proceedings.

On February 27, 2020, we filed a petition with the RJ Court requesting that we be permitted to submit to our creditors for their consideration and deliberation at a new general creditors’ meeting a proposed amendment to the RJ Plan designed to achieve greater operational and financial flexibility for our company to continue with investments and the fulfillment of our strategic plan. At the new general creditors’ meeting, only creditors of the RJ Debtors that held credits and had voting rights at the time of the original GCM and who continued to hold an interest in the debt obligations or equity securities of the RJ Debtors on February 27, 2020 will be entitled to vote.

On March 6, 2020, the RJ Court issued a decision granting our request to hold a new general creditors’ meeting to deliberate on a proposed amendment to the RJ Plan. The RJ Court required that:

the RJ Debtors must submit the proposed amendment to the RJ Plan to the RJ Court on or prior to September 8, 2020; and

the new general creditors’ meeting organized by the Judicial Reorganization Proceedings.”Administrator must take place within 60 days from the date of submission of the proposed amendment to the RJ Plan to the RJ Court by the RJ Debtors.

We intend to seek to amend the RJ Plan in order to facilitate asset sales contemplated by our strategic plan, including the potential sale of our mobile business and the proposed sales of othernon-core assets. We continue to discuss the terms of the proposed amendment with various constituencies of our company and can provide no assurances with respect to the specific terms of the proposed amendment that will be presented to the RJ Court.

ANATEL Proceedings

As a result of the commencement of the RJ Proceedings on June 20, 2016, all outstandingnon-tax claims of ANATEL against the RJ Debtors as of that date became subject to compromise under our RJ Proceedings. As of December 31, 2017, the aggregate amount of the contingencies for claims of ANATEL recognized by the RJ Court was R$9,334 million.

Under the RJ Plan, claims of ANATEL were classified as Class III claims. Under the RJ Plan, liquidated claims of ANATEL outstanding as of June 20, 2016 have been novated and in calculating the recovery of ANATEL under these claims the amounts of all accrued interest included in these claims was reduced by 50% and the amounts of all late charges included in these claims was reduced by 25%. The remaining amount of these claims will be settled in 240 monthly installments, beginning on June 30, 2018, in the amount of 0.160% of the outstanding claims for the first 60 monthly installments, 0.330% of the outstanding claims for the next 60 monthly installments, 0.500% of the outstanding claims for the next 60 monthly installments, 0.660% of the outstanding claims for the next 59 monthly installments, and the remainder at maturity on June 30, 2038. Beginning on July 31, 2018, the amounts of each monthly installment have been be adjusted by the SELIC variation. Payments of monthly installments will be made through the application of judicial deposits related to these claims until the balance of these judicial deposits has been exhausted and thereafter will be payable in cash inreais.

Under the RJ Plan,non-liquidated claims of ANATEL outstanding as of June 20, 2016 have been novated and ANATEL is entitled to the Default Recovery with respect to these claims.

In the event that a legal rule is adopted in Brazil that regulates an alternative manner for the settlement of the claims of ANATEL outstanding as of June 20, 2016, the RJ Debtors may adopt the new regime, observing the terms and conditions set forth in Oi’sby-laws.

Notwithstanding the above, ANATEL has challenged the treatment of its outstanding claims for fines, interest and penalties in the RJ Proceedings. Concurrently with our negotiations with our financial creditors as part of our RJ Proceedings, we engaged in negotiation and litigation with ANATEL, our largest creditor, with respect to the treatment of outstanding claims for fines, interest and penalties in the RJ Proceedings. On November 24, 2016, a hearing was held with the goal of consensually resolving ANATEL’s claims against the RJ Debtors’ as part of a mediation procedure initiated under RJ Proceedings. However, ANATEL filed an appeal against the decision which ordered the mediation, which is pending judgement.

The revised list of creditors submitted to the RJ Court by the Judicial Administrator, of the RJ Debtors, or the Second List of Creditors, recognized claims of ANATEL in the aggregate amount of approximately R$11.1 billion. On June 9, 2017 ANATEL filed a challenge to the Second List of Creditors, objecting the inclusion of its claim. We disagree with the amount and are challenging some of the noncompliance events alleged by ANATEL, and are also challenging the fairness of the penalties, emphasizing the unreasonableness of the amount of the imposed fines in light of the alleged noncompliance events.

The inclusion of the claims of ANATEL in the RJ Debtor’s judicial reorganization plan does not require the consent of ANATEL, but instead depends on the recognition of the applicability of the RJ Proceedings to these claims.

On August 23, 2016, ANATEL filed an appeal against the decision of the RJ Court which granted the processing of the RJ Proceedings, stating that the RJ Proceedings did not apply to ANATEL’s claims. On August 29, 2017, the 8th Civil Chamber of the Rio de Janeiro State Court of Justice granted ANATEL’s appeal to maintain the name of the RJ Debtors in the databases of the credit protection agencies, but held that thepre-petition claims of ANATEL were not tax claims and, therefore, were subject to the RJ Proceedings. On October 20, 2017, ANATEL filed a special and an extraordinary appeals against the decision of the 8th Civil Chamber of the Rio de Janeiro State Court of Justice. Judgments on these appeals by the Superior Court of Justice and the Supreme Court of Brazil are pending.

On September 4, 2017, ANATEL filed a request for stay against the decision of the RJ Court that permitted the GCM to be held without granting the request made by ANATEL to exclude all of its claims from the RJ Proceeding. On June 25, 2018 the Special Chamber of the Rio de Janeiro State Court of Justice denied the request.

Recognition Proceedings in the United States

On June 22, 2016, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court entered an order granting the provisional relief requested by the Chapter 15 Debtors in their cases that were filed on June 21, 2016 under Chapter 15 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. This provisional relief prevented (1) creditors from initiating actions against the Chapter 15 Debtors or their property located within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States, and (2) parties from terminating their existing U.S. contracts with the Chapter 15 Debtors.

On July 21, 2016, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court held a hearing with respect to the Chapter 15 Debtors petition for recognition of the RJ Proceedings as a main foreign proceeding with regard to each of the Chapter 15 Debtors and did not receive any objections to such petition.

On July 22, 2016, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court granted the U.S. Recognition Order, as a result of which a stay was automatically applied, preventing (1) the filing, in the United States, of any actions against the Chapter 15 Debtors or their properties located within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States, and (2) parties from terminating their existing U.S. contracts with the Chapter 15 Debtors.

On April 17, 2018, the foreign representative for the Chapter 15 Debtors filed a motion with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court seeking an order of that court granting, among other things, full force and effect to the RJ Plan and the Brazilian Confirmation Order in the United States. On June 14, 2018, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court granted the requested order. As a result, the claims with respect to the Defaulted Bonds that were governed by New York law have been novated and discharged under New York law and the holders of these Defaulted Bonds are entitled only to receive the recovery set forth in the RJ Plan in exchange for the claims represented by these Defaulted Bonds.

Recognition Proceedings in the United Kingdom

On June 23, 2016, the High Court of Justice of England and Wales granted the U.K. Recognition Orders. Together, the U.K. Recognition Orders:

stayed the commencement or continuation of individual actions or individual proceedings concerning the assets, rights, obligations or liabilities of Oi, Telemar and Oi Mobile;

stayed execution against the assets of Oi, Telemar and Oi Mobile; and

suspended the rights of Oi, Telemar and Oi Mobile to transfer, encumber or otherwise dispose of their assets.

On July 28, 2016, the U.K. Recognition Order granted in respect of Oi Mobile was partially modified to lift the suspension on its rights to transfer, encumber or otherwise dispose of its assets.

On May 17, 2018, meetings of each series of bonds issued by PTIF were held at which the bondholders voted in favor of extraordinary resolutions providing for, among other things, the release of Oi’s guarantee for each of the series of PTIF bonds. As a result, the bonds were modified so as to remove Oi’s obligation as a guarantor, leaving only PTIF as obligor. A deed of release evidencing the release of Oi’s guarantee obligations was executed by the parties on July 26, 2018.

As a result of the homologation of the PTIF Composition Plan described below under “—Restructuring of Our Dutch Finance Subsidiaries” on June 20, 2018, the PTIF Composition Plan was automatically recognized by each EU member state of the, including the UK, under the European Insolvency Regulation (2015/848). As a result, the claims against PTIF with respect to the Defaulted Bonds that were governed by English law have been novated and discharged as a matter of English law and the holders of these Defaulted Bonds are entitled only to receive the recovery set forth in the RJ Plan in exchange for the claims represented by these Defaulted Bonds.

Recognition Orders in Portugal

On November 14, 2016, Oi and Telemar requested the Portuguese Court to recognize the RJ Proceedings in Portugal in relation to Oi and Telemar under the Portuguese Insolvency and Corporate Recovery Code. On July 11, 2017, Oi Mobile requested the Portuguese Court to recognize the RJ Proceedings in relation to Oi Mobile under the Portuguese Insolvency and Corporate Recovery Code. The Portuguese Court granted recognition of the RJ Proceedings in Portugal in relation to Oi and Telemar on March 1, 2017 and Oi Mobile on August 4, 2017.

On May 9, 2018, Oi, Telemar and Oi Mobile, along with Copart 4 and Copart 5, filed a request for recognition of the RJ Plan in Portugal with respect to these entities. On August 1, 2018, the Portuguese Court rejected this decision on the grounds that the RJ Plan was still subject to appeal in Brazil. Oi appealed this decision, and on October 26, 2018, the Lisbon Court of Appeal reversed the decision of the Portuguese Court, recognized in Portugal the decision rendered by the RJ Court on January 8, 2018 and published on February 5, 2018, which confirmed the RJ Plan, and ordered the publication of the Brazilian decision in Portugal.

Restructuring of Our Dutch Finance Subsidiaries

Although the RJ Proceedings have been recognized in the United States, England and Wales and Portugal, the laws of The Netherlands do not provide for the recognition of the RJ Proceedings. Two of the RJ Debtors, Oi Coop and PTIF, are organized under the laws of The Netherlands. As a result, a group of holders of some of the Defaulted Bonds issued by Oi Coop and PTIF brought proceedings against these RJ Debtors in The Netherlands.

On June 27, 2016, Syzygy Capital Management, Ltd, an affiliate of Aurelius Capital Management LP, filed a petition for the involuntary bankruptcy of Oi Coop before the Dutch District Court, requesting that the Dutch District Court (1) declare Oi Coop in a state of bankruptcy, and (2) declare the bankruptcy of Oi Coop a main insolvency proceeding within the meaning of Article 3.1 of the European Insolvency Regulation (EC no. 1346/2000). Several other similar petitions were filed by other creditors of Oi Coop during July 2016.

On August 22, 2016, Citicorp Trustee Company Limited, or Citicorp, in its capacity as the trustee in respect of the a series of bonds issued by PTIF, purportedly acting at the direction of the requisite majority of the holders of these bonds, filed a petition for the involuntary bankruptcy of PTIF in the Dutch District Court requesting that the Dutch District Court (1) order the bankruptcy of PTIF, and (2) declare the bankruptcy of PTIF a main insolvency proceeding within the meaning of Article 3.1 of the European Insolvency Regulation (EC no. 1346/2000).

On April 10, 2018, PTIF deposited a draft of the PTIF Composition Plan with the Dutch District Court and Oi Coop deposited a draft of the Oi Coop Composition Plan with the Dutch District Court. The PTIF Composition Plan and the Oi Coop Composition Plan each provide for the restructuring of the claims against PTIF and Oi Coop on substantially the same terms and conditions as the RJ Plan.

On May 17, 2018, meetings of each series of bonds issued by PTIF were held at which the bondholders voted in favor of extraordinary resolutions providing for: (1) the release Oi’s guarantee for each of the relevant series of Defaulted Bonds, (2) the authorization of the trustee of each outstanding series of Defaulted Bonds issued by PTIF to act as a sole creditor of such Defaulted Bonds, submit a claim on behalf of the holders of such Defaulted Bonds to the PTIF Trustee in relation to the PTIF bankruptcy and vote in favor of the PTIF Composition Plan, and (3) authorize the trustee of each outstanding series of Defaulted Bonds issued by PTIF to request the PTIF Trustee in respect of its vote on behalf of PTIF, to vote in favor of the Oi Coop Composition Plan.

On June 1, 2018, at a meeting of the creditors of PTIF in the Netherlands, the creditors of PTIF approved the PTIF Composition Plan and directed the PTIF Trustee to vote PTIF’s claims in Oi Coop in favor of the Oi Coop Composition Plan. Also on June 1, 2018, at a meeting of the creditors of Oi Coop, the creditors of Oi Coop approved the Oi Coop Composition Plan.

On June 11, 2018, the Dutch District Court confirmed the PTIF Composition Plan and the Oi Coop Composition Plan at a homologation hearing. The homologation was subject to an eight day appeal period, which expired on June 19, 2018. As of that date, no appeals had been filed. As a result, the PTIF Composition Plan and the Oi Coop Composition Plan are effective as a matter of Dutch law, the bankruptcies of PTIF and Oi Coop have terminated and the PTIF Composition Plan and the Oi Coop Composition Plan have full force and effect in each member state of the European Union.

Oi Coop Avoidance Proceedings

On May 30, 2017, Mr. Berkenbosch, as Oi Coop’s bankruptcy trustee in theNetherlands, commenced a Dutch Pauliana action on behalf of the Dutch bankruptcy estate of Oi Coop against Oi and Oi Mobile in the Dutch District Court seeking repayment of and damages in relation to several intercompany loans made by Oi Coop to Oi and Oi Mobile.

On July 26, 2017, two funds that are holders of bonds issued by Oi Coop filed a request to join these proceedings in their capacity as creditors of Oi Coop andparties-in-interest the side of Oi and Oi Mobile. On September 13, 2017 and the District Court rendered a judgment in which it allowed the two funds to join the proceedings. Oi Coop, as an entity distinct from its bankruptcy estate, also sought to join the proceeding on the side of defendants Oi and Oi Mobile. On August 2, 2017, Oi Coop’s request for joinder was denied by the Dutch District Court. Oi Coop appealed this judgment. On December 5, 2017 the Court of Appeal rejected Oi Coop’s appeal against the judgment of the Dutch District Court denying the joinder of Oi Coop. On March 5, 2018, Oi Coop filed an appeal to the Dutch Supreme Court against the judgment of the Court of Appeal.

On June 25, 2018, Mr. Berkenbosch requested the Dutch District Court to remove the case from the docket because of the termination of the bankruptcy of Oi Coop. The Dutch District Court placed the case on the docket of October 3, 2018, for parties to inform the Dutch District Court whether they would like to continue the proceedings. On September 12, 2018, parties in interest to the proceeding, including funds Capricorn and Syzygy, informed the Dutch District Court that they agreed with the motion to withdraw the proceeding. On October 3, 2018, the Dutch District Court formally processed the motion to withdraw the proceedings and the proceedings were formally terminated.

On September 14, 2018, Oi Coop requested the Dutch Supreme Court to formally withdraw its appeal in cassation regarding its motion to join the proceedings. The Dutch Supreme Court formally terminated the appeal proceedings on September 28, 2018.

Market Arbitration Chamber Proceeding

Oi’sby-laws provide that disputes arising between shareholders and Oi relating to, among other things, alleged violations of Oi’sby-laws or the Brazilian Corporate Law must be resolved in arbitration proceedings before the Market Arbitration Chamber (Câmara de Arbitragem do Mercado) of the B3. In addition, Oi’sby-laws in effect prior to September 17, 2018, also provided that, prior to the formation of the arbitration panel, emergency measures relating to these alleged violations were required to be brought before an emergency arbitrator (árbitro de apoio) appointed by the Market Arbitration Chamber.

On February 28, 2018, one of our shareholders, Bratel, filed a petition with the Market Arbitration Chamber requesting the commencement of an arbitration against Oi and the appointment of an Emergency Arbitrator. Although the Market Arbitration Chamber does not have jurisdiction to reverse the approval of the RJ Plan by the GCM or to reverse the Brazilian Confirmation Order, Bratel alleged, among other things, that notwithstanding the Judicial Ratification of the RJ Plan by the RJ Court, certain provisions of the RJ Plan, including the Capitalization of Credits Capital Increase, the Cash Capital Increase and the changes to Oi’s corporate governance structure, which we refer to collectively as the “Corporate Law Provisions of the RJ Plan,” were required to be submitted to and approved by an EGM.

On January 8, 2019, Oi, Bratel and Pharol entered into the Pharol Settlement Agreement, which provides, among other things, for the termination of all existing litigation involving Oi, Bratel and Pharol in Brazil and abroad. The effectiveness of the Pharol Settlement Agreement was subject to confirmation by the RJ Court. On February 28, 2019, the RJ Court confirmed the Pharol Settlement Agreement by a decision published in the Official Gazette of the State of Rio de Janeiro on March 12, 2019. This decision became final on April 3, 2019.

As a result of the effectiveness of the Pharol Settlement Agreement, on April 8, 2019, Oi and Pharol filed a motion to terminate this proceeding, which is pending a final order.

Pharol Proceedings in Portugal

By means of the information provided by the media, the registration in the Commercial Registry of some of the Portuguese subsidiaries and Pharol’s announcement to the market via the Portuguese Securities Market Commission platform, Oi acknowledged that in May 2018 Pharol filed a motion for preliminary injunction against Oi and its Portuguese subsidiaries. Under Portuguese law, a preliminary injunction is decided without a prior hearing of the party or parties against whom the injunction is sought. Parties are summoned to the court only in the event that the court decides to grant the injunction. Portuguese Law also provides that the preliminary injunction should be decided, by the first instance court, within 15 days of its request by the moving party. According to Pharol’s announcement to the market via the Portuguese Securities Market Commission platform on September 13, 2018, the preliminary injunction was rejected, and an appeal against that decision was filed. As of the date of this annual report, no judgement has yet been rendered. However, as further described below, in light of the effectiveness of the Pharol Settlement Agreement, Pharol has filed a motion to terminate these proceedings.

Also by means of the information provided by the media and Pharol’s announcement to the market via the Portuguese Securities Market Commission platform, Oi acknowledged that in November 2018, Pharol filed an application against Oi and one of its Portuguese subsidiaries, PT Participações, SGPS, S.A., before the Lisbon Civil Court, pursuant to which it seeks to be compensated by Oi, in the amount of €2,017.1 million, which includes due and falling interest. The proceedings are grounded on the civil liability of Oi arising from an alleged breach of its duty to disclose information during the relationship with Pharol, particularly at the time of the General Meetings held in Lisbon, on September 8, 2014, January 12, 2015 and January 22, 2015. As of the date of this annual report, Oi has not yet been summoned to the proceedings to lodge its opposition. However, as further described below, in light of the effectiveness of the Pharol Settlement Agreement, Pharol has filed a motion to terminate these proceedings.

On January 8, 2019, Oi, Bratel and Pharol entered into the Pharol Settlement Agreement, which provides, among other things, for the termination of all existing litigation involving Oi, Bratel and Pharol in Brazil and abroad. The effectiveness of the Pharol Settlement Agreement was subject to confirmation by the RJ Court. On February 28, 2019, the RJ Court confirmed the Pharol Settlement Agreement by a decision published in the Official Gazette of the State of Rio de Janeiro on March 12, 2019. This decision became final on April 2, 2019.

As a result of the effectiveness of the Pharol Settlement Agreement, Pharol has filed motions to terminate the aforementioned proceedings.

Non-Provisioned Contingencies

We are defendants in various proceedings with no legal precedent involving network expansion plans, compensation for moral and material damages, collections and bidding proceedings, intellectual property and supplementary pension plan, among others, for which we deem the risk of loss as possible and have not recorded any provisions. As of December 31, 2018,2019, we deemed the risk of loss as possible with respect to R$30,08030,882 million of these proceedings. This amount is based on total value of the damages being sought by the plaintiffs; however, the value of some of these claims, cannot be estimated at this time. Typically, we believe the value of individual claims to be beyond the merits of the case in question.

Dividends and Dividend Policy

Dividend Policy

Oi’s dividend distribution policy has historically included the distribution of periodic dividends, based on the annual financial statements approved by Oi’s board of directors, in accordance with the Brazilian Corporate Law and as set forth in Oi’sby-laws, which provide that, in general, a minimum amount of 25% of Oi’s consolidated net income for each fiscal year, as calculated and adjusted for amounts allocated to legal and other applicable reserves in accordance with the Brazilian Corporate Law, must be distributed to shareholders. We refer to this amount as the mandatory distributable amount. Oi may pay the mandatory distributable amount as dividends, interest attributable to shareholders’ equity (which is similar to a dividend but is deductible in calculating corporate income tax and social contribution on net profits, subject to certain limitations imposed by law as described in “Item 10. Additional Information—Taxation—Brazilian Tax Considerations—Interest on Shareholders’ Equity”). Payment of intermediate or interim dividends is also be permitted, subject to market conditions, Oi’s then-prevailing financial condition and other factors deemed relevant by Oi’s board of directors. Oi may set off any payment of interim dividends against the amount of the mandatory distributable amount to be paid in the year in which the interim dividends are paid.

Notwithstanding the above, under Section 10.1 of the RJ Plan, Oi and the other RJ Debtors are prohibited from declaring or paying dividends, interest on shareholders’ equity or other forms of return on capital or making any other payment or distribution on or related to their shares (including any payment related to a merger or consolidation) until the sixth anniversary of the date of the Judicial Ratification of the RJ Plan.February 5, 2024. After the sixth anniversary of the date of the Judicial Ratification of the RJ Plan,February 5, 2024, Oi and the other RJ Debtors will be permitted to declare or pay dividends, interest on shareholders’ equity or other forms of return on capital or make any other payment or distribution on or related to their shares (including any payment related to a merger or consolidation) if the ratio of Oi’s consolidated net debt (defined as Financial Credits, minus Cash Balance (in each case as defined in the RJ Plan)) to EBITDA (as defined in the RJ Plan) for the fiscal year ended immediately prior to any such declaration or payment is less than or equal to 2 to 1.

The restrictions of the payment of dividends and other distributions described above are subject to the following exceptions:

 

dividends, return on capital or other distributions made between the RJ Debtors;

 

payments by Oi and the other RJ Debtors to dissenting shareholders, according to applicable law, carried out after the date of the Judicial Ratification of the RJ Plan;February5, 2018; and

 

any payment of dividends made in accordance with the RJ Plan.

There shall not be any restriction to the distribution of dividends under the RJ Plan after the full payment of the Financial Credits.

Pursuant to Section 10.2.1 of the RJ Plan, if at any time any two of Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s and Fitch rate Oi as investment grade and no default occurs, the restrictions on distributions imposed by Section 10.1 of the RJ Plan will be suspended. However, if one of these rating agencies, or both of them, subsequently cancels or downgrades Oi’s rating, then the suspended restrictions will be reinstated.

When Oi declares dividends, Oi is generally required to pay them within 60 days of declaring them, unless the shareholders’ resolution establishes another payment date. In any event, if Oi declares dividends, Oi must pay them by the end of the fiscal year for which they are declared. Under Article 9 of Law No. 9,249/95 and Oi’sby-laws, Oi also may pay interest attributable to shareholders’ equity as an alternative form of dividends upon approval of Oi’s board of directors.

Because Oi’s shares are issued inbook-entry form, dividends with respect to any share are automatically credited to the account holding such share. Shareholders who are not residents of Brazil must register with the Brazilian Central Bank in order for dividends, sales proceeds or other amounts with respect to their shares to be eligible to be remitted outside of Brazil.

The Common Shares and Preferred Shares underlying our ADSs are held in Brazil by the depositary, which has registered with the Brazilian Central Bank as the registered owner of such Common Shares and Preferred Shares. Payments of cash dividends and distributions, if any, will be made in Brazilian currency to the depositary. The depositary will then convert such proceeds into dollars and will cause such dollars to be distributed to holders of our ADSs. As with other types of remittances from Brazil, the Brazilian government may impose temporary restrictions on remittances to foreign investors of the proceeds of their investments in Brazil, as it did for approximately six months in 1989 and early 1999, and on the conversion of Brazilian currency into foreign currencies, which could hinder or prevent the depositary from converting dividends into U.S. dollars and remitting these U.S. dollars abroad. See “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Common Shares, Preferred Shares and ADSs.”

Distributions of dividends, including interest attributable to shareholders’ equity, in any year are made:

 

first, to the holders of Preferred Shares, up to the greaternon-cumulative amount of: (1) 6.0% per year of the amount resulting from Oi’s share capital divided by the number of Oi’s total issued shares, or (2) 3.0% per year of the book value of Oi’s shareholders’ equity divided by the number of Oi’s total issued shares, or the Minimum Preferred Dividend;

 

then, to the holders of Common Shares, until the amount distributed in respect of each Common Share is equal to the amount distributed in respect of each Preferred Share; and

 

  

thereafter, to the holders of Common Shares and Preferred Shares on apro rata basis.

Under Oi’sby-laws, if the Minimum Preferred Dividend is not paid for a period of three years, holders of Preferred Shares are entitled to full voting rights. As a result of Oi’s failure to pay the Minimum Preferred Dividend for 2014, 2015 and 2016, holders of Oi’s Preferred Shares obtained full voting rights on April 28, 2017, the date that Oi’s annual shareholders’ meeting approved our financial statements for fiscal year 2016.

Historical Payment of Dividends

Oi has not paid any dividends and/or interest attributable to shareholders’ equity since January 1, 2014.

Taxation of Dividends

Under the current Brazilian tax law, dividends paid to persons who are not Brazilian residents, including holders of ADSs, are not subject to Brazilian withholding tax, except for dividends declared based on profits generated prior to December 31, 1995, which may be subject to Brazilian withholding income tax at varying tax rates. Any payment of interest attributable to shareholders’ equity to holders of Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs, whether or not they are Brazilian residents, is subject to Brazilian withholding tax at the rate of 15%, except that a 25% withholding tax rate applies if the recipient is domiciled in a Favorable Tax Jurisdiction. For information regarding Brazilian tax implications of dividends and interest attributable to shareholders’ equity, see “Item 10. Additional Information—Taxation—Brazilian Tax Considerations.”

Holders of Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs may also be subject to U.S. federal income taxation on dividends and interest attributable to shareholders’ equity. For more information on the U.S. federal income tax implications of dividends and interest attributable to shareholders’ equity, see “Item 10. Additional Information—Taxation—U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations.”

Significant Changes

Other than as disclosed in this annual report, no significant change has occurred since the date of the audited consolidated financial statements included in this annual report.

ITEM 9.

THE OFFER AND LISTING

Markets for Oi’s Equity Securities

The principal trading market for Common Shares and Preferred Shares is the B3, where they are traded under the symbols “OIBR3” and “OIBR4,” respectively. Oi’s Common Shares and Preferred Shares began trading on the B3 on July 10, 1992. On November 16, 2001, Preferred ADSs began tradingtrade on the NYSE under the symbol “BTM.“OIBR.C.On November 17, 2009, Common ADSs began trading on the NYSE under the symbol “BTMC.” On April 9, 2012, the trading symbols for Preferred ADSs and Common ADSs on the NYSE were changed to “OIBR” and “OIBR.C,” respectively.

On June 21, 2016, the NYSE determined that Preferred ADSs should be suspended immediately from trading and commenced procedures to remove Preferred ADSs from listing and registration on the NYSE based on the “abnormally low” trading price of Preferred ADSs. On June 23, 2016, theThe OTC Markets Group, Inc. began publishingpublishes quotations for Oi’s Preferred ADS in the “pink sheets” under the trading symbol OIBRQ. On July 6, 2016, the NYSE filed a Notification of Removal from Listing and/or Registration under Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 with the SEC with respect to Preferred ADSs, and Preferred ADSs were removed from listing and registration on the Exchange on July 18, 2016. The Common ADSs continue to be listed and registered on the NYSE.

Oi has registered its Common ADSs and Preferred ADSs with the SEC pursuant to the Exchange Act. On April 23, 2019, there were 741,936,189 Common ADSs outstanding, representing 3,709,680,945 Common Shares, or 64.00% of the outstanding Common Shares, and 35,180,071 Preferred ADSs outstanding, representing 35,180,071 Preferred Shares or 22.56% of the outstanding Preferred Shares.

Price History of the Common Shares, Preferred Shares and ADSs

The tables below set forth the high and low closing sales prices and the approximate average daily trading volume for Common Shares and Preferred Shares on the B3 and the high and low closing sales prices and the approximate average daily trading volume for Common ADSs and Preferred ADSs on the NYSE for the periods indicated.

   

B3

   

NYSE

 
   

Reais per Common Share(1)

   

U.S. dollars per Common ADS(1)

 
   

Closing Price
per Common Share

   Average Daily
Trading Volume

(thousands of shares)
   

Closing Price
per Common ADS

   Average Daily Trading
Volume (thousands
of Common ADSs)
 
   

High

  Low       

High

  Low     
   (in reais)       (in U.S. dollars)     

2014

  48.80   9.15    467.8   101.5   16.6    36.3 

2015

  9.12   2.06    1,060.9   16.4   2.5    57.7 

2016

  4.20   0.80    5,236.0   6.1   1.1    178.3 

2017

  6.06   2.62    1,973.5   9.49   3.94    61.4 

2018

  4.50   1.24    6,866.0   6.88   1.56    414.4 
                       

2017

            

First Quarter

  5.42   2.62    2,533.6   8.48   3.94    64.7 

Second Quarter

  4.65   3.59    978.9   7.24   5.27    112.3 

Third Quarter

  5.10   4.00    1,218.0   8.09   6.20    36.7 

Fourth Quarter

  6.06   3.38    3,232.5   9.49   5.00    32.3 
                       

2018

            

First Quarter

  4.50   3.19    5,740.0   6.88   4.85    107.8 

Second Quarter

  4.50   3.36    3,322.6   5.98   4.36    161.4 

Third Quarter

  3.95   2.09    4,930.8   5.07   2.47    514.9 

Fourth Quarter

  2.22   1.24    13,962.0   3.92   1.56    875.2 
                       

2019

            

First Quarter

  1.90   1.25    40,621.8   2.46   1.61    2,480.2 
                       

Most Recent Six Months

            

October 2018

  2.90   2.25    7,807.4   3.76   2.79    855.0 

November 2018

  2.22   1.44    14,494.7   3.92   1.85    1,005.1 

December 2018

  1.43   1.24    20,804.1   1.78   1.56    755.1 

January 2019

  1.43   1.25    27,792.0   1.90   1.61    1,797.4 

February 2019

  1.79   1.32    54,267.9   2.29   1.73    3,388.8 

March 2019

  1.90   1.52    40,437.9   2.46   1.88    2,341.0 

April 2019(2)

  1.75   1.44    50,336.5   2.18   1.80    2,044.3 

(1)

Adjusted to reflect the reverse split of all of the issued Common Shares into one Common Share for each 10 issued Common Shares that became effective on December 22, 2014 and change in the ratio applicable to the Common ADSs as a result of which each Common ADS which formerly represented one Common Share has represented five Common Shares since February 1, 2016.

(2)

Through April 23, 2019.

Source:

Quantum Finance/IPREO

   

B3

  NYSE/OTC MARKET
   

Reais per Preferred Share(1)(2)

  U.S. dollars per Preferred ADS(2)
   

Closing Price
per Preferred Share

  

Average Daily
Trading Volume

(thousands of shares)

  Closing Price
per Preferred ADS
  

Average Daily
Trading Volume

(thousands
of Preferred ADSs)

   

High

  

Low

     High   

Low

   
   (in reais)     (in U.S. dollars)   

2014

  44.20  8.61  3,692.3   18.80   3.17  1,263.4

2015

  8.43  1.30  4,608.5   3.15   0.34  2,327.2

2016(3)

  3.47  0.80  8,047.5   0.92   0.17  —  

2017

  5.10  2.26  4,152.6   1.55   0.65  —  

2018

  3.92  1.25  2,104.3   1.16   0.26  —  
                    

2017

            

First Quarter

  4.80  2.26  6,839.0   1.48   0.65  —  

Second Quarter

  3.91  2.98  2,120.9   1.24   0.88  —  

Third Quarter

  3.72  3.16  1,970.5   1.14   0.95  —  

Fourth Quarter

  5.10  3.05  5,797.2   1.55   0.92  —  
                    

2018

            

First Quarter

  3.92  3.29  1,815.4   1.16   0.96  —  

Second Quarter

  3.53  2.61  1,668.7   1.03   0.73  —  

Third Quarter

  3.36  1.91  1,370.2   0.89   0.43  —  

Fourth Quarter

  2.68  1.25  3,647.3   0.76   0.26  —  
                    

2019

            

First Quarter

  1.88  1.29  4,410.2   0.50   0.31  —  
                    

Most Recent Six Months

            

October 2018

  2.48  1.97  2,016.8   0.69   0.50  —  

November 2018

  2.68  1.46  4,786.6   0.76   0.36  —  

December 2018

  1.49  1.25  4,437.5   0.39   0.26  —  

January 2019

  1.48  1.29  3,426.0   0.40   0.31  —  

February 2019

  1.80  1.41  5,365.1   0.46   0.36  —  

March 2019

  1.88  1.51  4,492.8   0.50   0.39  —  

April 2019(5)

  1.73  1.47  3,885.0   0.45   0.39  —  

(1)

Adjusted to reflect the reverse split of all of the issued Preferred Shares into one Preferred Share for each 10 issued Preferred Shares that became effective on December 22, 2014.

(2)

Adjusted to reflect change of ratio from three Preferred Shares per Preferred ADS to one Preferred Share per Preferred ADS effective as of August 15, 2012.

(3)

NYSE/OTC Market prices and volumes represent (1) the closing prices reported by (a) the NYSE from January 1, 2016 through June 21, 2016, the date on which trading of Preferred ADSs was suspended by the NYSE, and (b) the OTC Markets Group, Inc. from June 23, 2016, the date on which quotation reporting for Preferred ADSs commenced on the “pink sheets” of the OTC Markets Group, Inc., through December 31, 2016, and (2) the average of (a) the volumes reported by the NYSE from January 1, 2016 through June 21, 2016, and (b) the volumes reported by OTC Markets Group, Inc. from June 23, 2016 through December 31, 2016.

(4)

NYSE/OTC Market prices and volumes represent (1) the closing prices reported by (a) the NYSE from March 31, 2016 through June 21, 2016, the date on which trading of Preferred ADSs was suspended by the NYSE, and (b) the OTC Markets Group, Inc. from June 23, 2016, the date on which quotation reporting for Preferred ADSs commenced on the “pink sheets” of the OTC Markets Group, Inc., through June 30, 2016, and (2) the average of (a) the volumes reported by the NYSE from March 31, 2016 through June 21, 2016, and (b) the volumes reported by OTC Markets Group, Inc. from June 23, 2016 through June 30, 2016.

(5)

Through April 23, 2019.

Source:

Quantum Finance/IPREO

On April 23, 2019, the closing sales price of:

Common Shares on the B3 was R$1.75 per Common Share;

Common ADSs on the NYSE was US$2.18 per Common ADS;

Preferred Shares on the B3 was R$1.73 per Preferred Share; and

Preferred ADSs in the “pink sheets” as reported by the OTC Markets Group, Inc. was US$0.45 per Preferred ADS.

Regulation of Brazilian Securities Markets

The Brazilian securities markets are regulated by the CVM, which has regulatory authority over the stock exchanges and the securities markets generally, the National Monetary Council and the Brazilian Central Bank, which has, among other powers, licensing authority over brokerage firms and which regulates foreign investment and foreign exchange transactions. The Brazilian securities markets are governed by (1) Law No. 6,385, as amended and supplemented, which is the principal law governing the Brazilian securities markets, (2) the Brazilian Corporate Law, and (3) the regulations issued by the CVM, the National Monetary Council and the Brazilian Central Bank.

These laws and regulations provide for, among other things, disclosure requirements applicable to issuers of publicly traded securities, restrictions on insider trading (including criminal sanctions under the Brazilian Penal Code) and price manipulation, protection of minority shareholders and disclosure of transactions in a company’s securities by its insiders, including directors, officers and major shareholders. They also provide for the licensing and oversight of brokerage firms and the governance of Brazilian stock exchanges.

However, the Brazilian securities markets are not as highly regulated or supervised as U.S. securities markets or securities markets in some other jurisdictions. In addition, rules and policies against self-dealing or for preserving shareholder interests may be less well-defined and enforced in Brazil than in the United States, which may put holders of Common Shares and Common ADSs at a disadvantage. Finally, corporate disclosures also may be less complete than for public companies in the United States and certain other jurisdictions.

Under the Brazilian Corporate Law, a company is either publicly held (companhia aberta), as Oi is, or privately held (companhia fechada). All publicly held companies are registered with the CVM and are subject to reporting and regulatory requirements. A company registered with CVM may have its securities traded either on the B3 or in the Brazilianover-the-counter market. Shares of companies, such as Oi, that are listed on the B3 may not simultaneously trade on the Brazilianover-the-counter market. The shares of a publicly held company may also be traded privately, subject to certain limitations.

The Brazilianover-the-counter market consists of direct trades between individuals in which a financial institution registered with the CVM serves as intermediary. No special application, other than registration with the CVM, is necessary for securities of a public company to be traded in this market. The CVM requires that it be given notice of all trades carried out in the Brazilianover-the-counter market by the respective intermediaries.

Brazilian regulations also require that any person or group of persons representing the same interest that has directly or indirectly carried out a material transaction or set of transactions by which the equity interest held by such person or group of persons surpasses or falls below the thresholds of 5%, or any 5% multiple thereof, of a type or class of shares of a publicly traded company must provide such publicly traded company with information on such transaction and its purpose, and such company must transmit this information to the CVM. If this acquisition causes a change in the control of the company or in the administrative structure of the company, or if this acquisition triggers the obligation to make a public offering in accordance with CVM Instruction No. 361, as amended, then the acquirer must disclose this information to the applicable stock exchanges and the same means of communication usually adopted by the company.

Trading on the B3

Overview of the B3

In 2000, the São Paulo Stock Exchange (Bolsa de Valores de São Paulo S.A. – BVSP), or the BOVESPA was reorganized through the execution of memoranda of understanding by the Brazilian stock exchanges. Following this reorganization, the BOVESPA was anon-profit entity owned by its member brokerage firms and trading on the BOVESPA was limited to these member brokerage firms and a limited number of authorized nonmembers. Under the memoranda, all securities are now traded only on the BOVESPA, with the exception of electronically traded public debt securities and privatization auctions, which are traded on the Rio de Janeiro Stock Exchange.

In August 2007, the BOVESPA underwent a corporate restructuring that resulted in the creation of BOVESPA Holding S.A., a public corporation, whose wholly-owned subsidiaries were (1) the BOVESPA, which is responsible for the operations of the stock exchange and the organizedover-the-counter markets, and (2) the Brazilian Settlement and Custodial Company (Companhia Brasileira de Liquidação e Custódia), or CBLC, which is responsible for settlement, clearing and depositary services. In the corporate restructuring, all holders of membership certificates of the BOVESPA and of shares of CBLC became shareholders of BOVESPA Holding S.A. As a result of the corporate restructuring, access to the trading and other services rendered by the BOVESPA is not conditioned on stock ownership in BOVESPA Holding S.A.

In May 2008, the BOVESPA merged with the Commodities and Futures Exchange (Bolsa de Mercadorias & Futuros) to form the BM&FBOVESPA. In November 2008, the CBLC merged with the BM&FBOVESPA. As a result, the BM&FBOVESPA now performs its own settlement, clearing and depositary services. In March 2017, BM&FBOVESPA merged with Cetip S.A. – Mercados Organizados, a settlement and clearing house in Brazil to form the B3 S.A. – Brasil, Bolsa, Balcão.

Trading and Settlement

Trading of equity securities on the B3 is conducted through an electronic trading system called Megabolsa every business day, typically from 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., São Paulo time. During certain months, however, to account for daylight saving time in Brazil and more closely align with trading hours in the United States, trading hours on the B3 are extended by one hour to 6:00 p.m., São Paulo time. When trading ends at 5:00 p.m. São Paulo time, trading of equity securities on the B3 is also conducted after market between 5:25 p.m. and 6:00 p.m., São Paulo time, in an after-market system connected to both traditional brokerage firms and brokerage firms operating on the internet. This after-market trading is subject to regulatory limits on price volatility of securities and on the volume of shares traded by investors operating on the internet. When trading ends at 5:00 p.m. São Paulo time, there is no after marketafter-market trading.

Since March 2003, market making activities have been allowed on the B3. As of the date of this annual report Credit Suisse (Brasil) S.A. Corretora de Títulos e Valores Mobiliários acts as market maker of the Common Shares and Preferred Shares on the B3. Trading in securities listed on the B3 may be effected off the exchange in the unorganizedover-the-counter market under certain circumstances, although such trading is very limited.

The trading of securities of a company on the B3 is automatically suspended when a Company announces a material event. It is also recommended that the company simultaneously make a request to suspend trading in any international stock exchange in which its securities are traded. The CVM and the B3 have discretionary authority to suspend trading in shares of a particular issuer, based on or due to a belief that, among other reasons, a company has provided inadequate information regarding a material event or has provided inadequate responses to inquiries by the CVM or the B3.

In order to reduce volatility, the B3 has adopted a “circuit breaker” mechanism under which trading sessions may be suspended for a period of 30 minutes or one hour whenever the Ibovespa index falls 10% or 15%, respectively, compared to the closing of the previous trading session. Also, if after the reopening of the market the Ibovespa falls 20% compared to the closing of the previous day, the operations are suspended for a certain period to be defined by the B3. This mechanism is not applied in the last half hour of the trading session.

Settlement of transactions on the B3 is effected threetwo business days after the trade date, without adjustment of the purchase price for inflation. Delivery of and payment for shares is made through the facilities of the clearing and settlement chamber of the B3. The seller is ordinarily required to deliver shares to the clearing and settlement chamber of the B3 on the second business day following the trade date.

Regulation of Foreign Investments

Trading on the B3 by a holder not deemed to be domiciled in Brazil for Brazilian tax and regulatory purposes, or aNon-Brazilian Holder, is subject to certain limitations under Brazilian foreign investment regulations. With limited exceptions,Non-Brazilian Holder may trade on the B3 only in accordance with the requirements of Annex I of Resolution No. 4,373 of the National Monetary Council. Annex I of Resolution No. 4,373 requires that securities held byNon-Brazilian Holders be registered, maintained in the custody of, or maintained in deposit accounts with, financial institutions that are authorized by the Brazilian Central Bank and the CVM, as applicable. Subject to limited exceptions provided in the CVM regulation or previous CVM authorization, Annex I of Resolution No. 4,373 requiresNon-Brazilian Holders (1) to restrict their securities trading to transactions on the B3 or qualifiedover-the-counter markets; and (2) to not transfer the ownership of investments made under Annex I of Resolution No. 4,373 through private transactions. See “Item 10. Additional Information—Exchange Controls—Annex I of Resolution No. 4,373,” and “Item 10. Additional Information—Exchange Controls—Annex II of Resolution No. 4,373 – ADSs” for further information about Resolution No. 4,373, and “Item 10. Additional Information—Taxation—Brazilian Tax Considerations—Taxation of Gains” for a description of certain tax benefits extended toNon-Brazilian Holders who qualify under Resolution No. 4,373.

B3 Corporate Governance Standards

In December 2000, the B3 introduced three special listing segments:

 

Level 1 of Differentiated Corporate Governance Practices;

 

Level 2 of Differentiated Corporate Governance Practices; and

 

  

TheNovo Mercado (New Market).

These special listing segments were designed for the trading of shares issued by companies that voluntarily undertake to abide by corporate governance practices and disclosure requirements in addition to those already required by Brazilian law. The inclusion of a company in any of the special listing segments requires adherence to a series of corporate governance rules. These rules were designed to increase shareholders’ rights and enhance the quality of information provided to shareholders.

Oi’s shares joined Level 1 of Differentiated Corporate Governance Practices on December 14, 2012. As a Level 1 company, Oi must, among other things:

 

ensure that shares representing 25% of its total share capital are effectively available for trading;

 

adopt offering procedures that favor widespread ownership of shares whenever Oi makes a public offering;

 

comply with minimum quarterly disclosure standards, including issuing consolidated financial information, a cash flow statement, and special audit revisions on a quarterly basis;

 

follow stricter disclosure policies with respect to contracts with related parties, material contracts and transactions involving its securities made by its controlling shareholders, if any, directors or executive officers;

make a schedule of corporate events available to its shareholders; and

 

hold public meetings with analysts and investors at least annually.

Pursuant to the regulations of the B3, the members of Oi’s board of directors and board of executive officers are personally liable for its compliance with the rules and regulations of the B3’s Level 1 Listing Segment.

Moreover, in September 2015, Oi amended itsby-laws in order to comply with the rules of theNovo Mercado segment of the B3 even though Oi has not formally joined this special listing segment. These amendments include the requirement that at least 20% of the members of Oi’s board of directors be independent members as defined in the listing regulations of theNovo Mercado and Article 141, paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Brazilian Corporate Law.

ITEM 10.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Description of Oi’sBy-laws

The following is a summary of the material provisions of Oi’sby-laws and of the Brazilian Corporate Law. In Brazil, a company’sby-laws (estatuto social) are the principal governing document of a corporation (sociedade anônima). This summary also includes relevant provisions of the RJ Plan. In case of a conflict and/or discrepancy between the RJ Plan and Oi’sby-laws’ rules, the RJ Plan shall prevail.

General

Oi’s registered name is Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, and its registered office is located in the City of Rio de Janeiro, State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Oi’s registration number with the Board of Trade of the State of Rio de Janeiro isNo. 33.3.0029520-8. Oi has been duly registered with the CVM under No. 11312 since March 27, 1980. Oi’s headquarters are located in City of Rio de Janeiro, State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Oi has a perpetual existence.

As of December 31, 2018, Oi had outstanding share capital of R$32,038,471,375,00, comprised of 2,455,973,860 total shares, consisting of 2,298,246,619 issued Common Shares2019 and 157,727,241 issued Preferred Shares, including 32,030,595 Common Shares and 1,811,755 Preferred Shares held in treasury. As of April 23, 2019,24, 2020, Oi had outstanding share capital of R$32,538,937,370.00, comprised of 5,954,205,001 total shares, consisting of 5,796,477,760 issued Common Shares and 157,727,241 issued Preferred Shares, including 30,595 Common Shares and 1,811,755 Preferred Shares held in treasury. All of Oi’s outstanding share capital is fully paid. All of Oi’s shares are without par value. Under the Brazilian Corporate Law, the aggregate number of Oi’snon-voting and limited voting preferred shares may not exceedtwo-thirds of Oi’s total outstanding share capital. In addition, Oi’s board of directors may increase Oi’s share capital to a number of Common Shares equivalent to R$38,038,701,741.49, provided that no Preferred Shares are issued by Oi in public or private subscriptions.

Section 5.3 of the RJ Plan allows Oi to raise up to R$2.5 billion in additional funds during thetwo-year period beginning on the Brazilian Confirmation Date, which occurred on February 5, 2018, including through additional capital increases. Any such additional capital increases must comply with the terms of the RJ Plan and Oi’sby-laws.

Corporate Purposes

Under Article 2 of Oi’sby-laws, Oi’s corporate purposes are:

 

to offer telecommunications services and all activities required or useful for the operation of these services, in conformity with its concessions, authorizations and permits;

 

to participate in the capital of other companies;

 

to organize wholly-owned subsidiaries for the performance of activities that are consistent with its corporate purposes and recommended to be decentralized;

 

to import, or promote the importation of, goods and services that are necessary to the performance of activities consistent with its corporate purposes;

 

to provide technical assistance services to other telecommunications companies engaged in activities of common interest;

to perform study and research activities aimed at the development of the telecommunications sector;

 

to enter into contracts and agreements with other telecommunications companies or other persons or entities to assure the operations of its services, with no loss of its attributions and responsibilities; and

 

to perform other activities related to the above corporate purposes.

Board of Directors

Oi’sby-laws provide for a board of directors of up to 11 members with no alternate members. Members who are absent at meetings will be entitled to appoint a substitute among the present members to vote in their stead. Under Oi’sby-laws, any matters subject to the approval of Oi’s board of directors can be approved only by a majority of votes of the members of Oi’s board of directors. In the event of a tie, the chairman of the board of directors shall cast the deciding vote. Under Oi’sby-laws, Oi’s board of directors may only deliberate if a majority of its members are present at a duly convened meeting.

Oi’s board of directors is presided over by the chairman of the board of directors and, in his or her absence, on an interim basis, by the vice-chairman of the board of directors and, in his or her absence, on an interim basis, by another member appointed by the chairman or, if no such member has been appointed, by another member appointed by the other members in attendance. Pursuant to Oi’sby-laws, the chairman and vice-chairman of Oi’s board of directors are elected by the members of the Oi’s board of directors during their first meeting following their election. Oi’sby-laws provide that the positions of chairman of Oi’s board of directors and Oi’s chief executive officer or principal executive may not be held by the same person.

The following paragraphs describe the material provisions of Oi’sby-laws and of the Brazilian Corporate Law that apply to the members of Oi’s board of directors.

Election of Directors

The members of Oi’s board of directors are elected at general meetings of shareholders for concurrenttwo-year terms.terms and are eligible for reelection.

Generally, members of Oi’s board of directors are subject to removal at any time with or without cause at a general meeting of shareholders. The RJ Plan, however, provides certain corporate governance rules that apply to Oi’s board of directors during the effectiveness of the RJ Plan, superseding the provisions of Oi’sby-laws. As provided in the RJ Plan, until the expiration of the term of Oi’s current board of directors, which will occur on September 17, 2020, the members of Oi’s board of directors may not be removed from office, except due to gross mistake, willful misconduct, gross negligence, abuse of term of office or violation of fiduciary duties in accordance with applicable law. Following the expiration of the term of Oi’s current board of directors, the election of subsequent boards of directors will follow the rules established by Oi’sby-laws and the Brazilian Corporate Law.

The tenure of the members of the board of directors and board of executive officers is conditioned on such members signing a Term of Consent (Termo de Anuência dos Administradores) in accordance with the Level 1 Corporate Governance Listing Segment of the B3 and complying with applicable legal requirements.

Qualification of Directors

There is no minimum share ownership or citizenship or residency requirement to qualify for membership on Oi’s board of directors. Oi’sby-laws do not require the members of its board of directors to be residents of Brazil. The Brazilian Corporate Law requires each of Oi’s executive officers to be residents of Brazil. The tenure of the members of the board of directors will be conditioned on the appointment of a representative who resides in Brazil, with powers to receive service of process in proceedings initiated against such member based on the corporate legislation, by means of apower-of-attorney with a validity term of at least three years after the end of thesuch member’s term of office. Pursuant to Oi’sby-laws, Oi’s directors may not (1) hold positions, particularly positions in advisory, management or audit committees, of companies that compete with Oi or its subsidiaries, and (2) may not have conflicts of interest with Oi or its subsidiaries.

Pursuant to Oi’sby-laws, at least 20% of the members of Oi’s board of directors must be independent as defined in the listing regulations of theNovo Mercado segment of the B3 and must be expressly declared as independent in the shareholders’ meeting that elects them, being also considered as independent the members elected as per article 141, paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Brazilian Corporate Law. All of the members of Oi’s board of directors are independent.

Fiduciary Duties and Conflicts of Interest

All members of Oi’s board of directors owe fiduciary duties to Oi and all of Oi’s shareholders.

Under the Brazilian Corporate Law, if one of Oi’s directors or executive officers has a conflict of interest with Oi in connection with any proposed transaction, such director or executive officer may not vote in any decision of Oi’s board of directors or of Oi’s board of executive officers, as the case may be, regarding such transaction and must disclose the nature and extent of his or her conflicting interest for inclusion in the minutes of the applicable meeting.

Any transaction in which one of Oi’s directors or executive officers may have an interest, including any financings, can only be approved on reasonable and fair terms and conditions that are no more favorable than the terms and conditions prevailing in the market or offered by third parties. If any such transaction does not meet this requirement, then the Brazilian Corporate Law provides that the transaction may be nullified and the interested director or executive officer must return to Oi any benefits or other advantages that he or she obtained from, or as result of, such transaction. Under the Brazilian Corporate Law and upon the request of a shareholder who owns at least 5.0% of Oi’s total share capital, Oi’s directors and executive officers must reveal to Oi’s shareholders at an ordinary meeting of Oi’s shareholders certain transactions and circumstances that may give rise to a conflict of interest. In addition, Oi or any shareholder who owns 5.0% or more of Oi’s share capital may bring an action for civil liability against directors and executive officers for any losses caused to Oi as a result of a conflict of interest.

Compensation

Under Oi’sby-laws, holders of Common Shares approve the aggregate compensation payable to Oi’s board of directors, board of executive officers and fiscal council. Subject to this approval, Oi’s board of directors establishes the compensation of its members and of Oi’s executive officers. See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Compensation.”

Mandatory Retirement

Neither the Brazilian Corporate Law nor Oi’sby-laws establish any mandatory retirement age for Oi’s directors or executive officers.

Share Capital

Under the Brazilian Corporate Law, the number of Oi’s issued and outstandingnon-voting shares or shares with limited voting rights, such as Preferred Shares, may not exceedtwo-thirds of Oi’s total outstanding share capital.

Each Common Share entitles its holder to one vote at Oi’s annual and extraordinary shareholders’ meetings. Holders of Common Shares are not entitled to any preference in respect of dividends or other distributions or otherwise in case of Oi’s liquidation.

Preferred Shares arenon-voting, except in limited circumstances, and do not have priority over Common Shares in the case of Oi’s liquidation. See “—Voting Rights” for information regarding the voting rights of Oi’s preferred shares and “Item 8. Financial Information—Dividends and Dividend Policy” and “—Dividend Preference of Preferred Shares” for information regarding the distribution preferences of Preferred Shares.

The issuance of new preferred shares by Oi is prohibited.

Shareholders’ Meetings

Under the Brazilian Corporate Law, Oi’s shareholders must hold their ordinary annual meeting by April 30 of each year in order to:

 

approve or reject the financial statements approved by Oi’s board of directors and board of executive officers, including any recommendation by Oi’s board of directors for the allocation of net profit and distribution of dividends; and

 

elect members of Oi’s board of directors (upon expiration of theirtwo-year terms) and members of Oi’s fiscal council.

In addition to the annual shareholders’ meetings, holders of Common Shares have the power to determine any matters related to changes in Oi’s corporate purposes and to pass any resolutions they deem necessary to protect and enhance Oi’s development whenever Oi’s interests so require, by means of extraordinary shareholders’ meetings.

Oi convenes shareholders’ meetings, including the annual shareholders’ meeting, by publishing a notice in the national edition ofValor Econômico, a Brazilian newspaper, and in the Official Gazette of the State of Rio de Janeiro. Under the Brazilian Corporate Law, on the first call of any meeting, the notice must be published no fewer than three times, beginning at least 15 calendar days prior to the scheduled meeting date, and companies that have issued ADSs must publish their notice at least 30 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. Oi publishes notices of meetings 30 calendar days prior to the scheduled meeting date. The notice must contain the meeting’s place, date, time, agenda and, in the case of a proposed amendment to Oi’sby-laws, a description of the subject matter of the proposed amendment.

Oi’s board of directors may convene a shareholders’ meeting. Under the Brazilian Corporate Law, shareholders’ meetings also may be convened by Oi’s shareholders as follows:

 

by any of Oi’s shareholders if, under certain circumstances set forth in the Brazilian Corporate Law, Oi’s directors do not convene a shareholders’ meeting required by law within 60 days;

 

by shareholders holding at least 5% of Oi’s total share capital if, after a period of eight days, Oi’s directors fail to call a shareholders’ meeting that has been requested by such shareholders; and

 

by shareholders holding at least 5% of either Oi’s total voting share capital or Oi’s totalnon-voting share capital, if after a period of eight days, Oi’s directors fail to call a shareholders’ meeting for the purpose of appointing a fiscal council that has been requested by such shareholders.

In addition, Oi’s fiscal council may convene a shareholders’ meeting if Oi’s board of directors does not convene an annual shareholders’ meeting within 30 days or at any other time to consider any urgent and serious matters.

Each shareholders’ meeting shall be convened and presided over by the chairman of the board of directors or his or her valid proxy. In the case of absence of the chairman or his or her proxy, the meeting shall be convened and presided over by the vice-chairman of the board of directors or his or her valid proxy. In the case of absence of the vice-chairman or his or her proxy, the meeting shall be convened and presided by any director present at the meeting. The chairman of the meeting shall be responsible for choosing the secretary of the meeting.

In order for a valid action to be taken at a shareholders’ meeting, shareholders representing at least 25% of Oi’s issued and outstanding voting share capital must be present on first call. However, shareholders representing at leasttwo-thirds of Oi’s issued and outstanding voting share capital must be present on first call at a shareholders’ meeting called to amend Oi’sby-laws. If a quorum is not present, Oi’s board of directors may issue a second call by publishing a notice as described above at least eight calendar days prior to the scheduled meeting. Except as otherwise provided by law, the quorum requirements do not apply to a meeting held on the second call, and the shareholders’ meetings may be convened with the presence of shareholders representing any number of shares (subject to the voting requirements for certain matters described below). A shareholder without a right to vote may attend a shareholders’ meeting and take part in the discussion of matters submitted for consideration.

Voting Rights

Under the Brazilian Corporate Law and Oi’sby-laws, each Common Share entitles its holder to one vote at Oi’s shareholders’ meetings. Preferred Shares generally do not confer voting rights, except in limited circumstances described below. Oi may not restrain or deny any voting rights without the consent of the majority of the shares affected. Whenever the shares of any class of share capital are entitled to vote, each share is entitled to one vote.

Voting Rights of Common Shares

Except as otherwise provided by law, resolutions of a shareholders’ meeting are passed by a simple majority vote of the holders of Common Shares present or represented at the meeting, without taking abstentions into account. Under the Brazilian Corporate Law, the approval of shareholders representing at least half of Oi’s outstanding voting shares is required for the types of action described below:

 

reducing the mandatory dividend set forth in Oi’sby-laws;

 

changing its corporate purpose;

 

merging Oi with another company, or consolidating Oi, subject to the conditions set forth in the Brazilian Corporate Law;

 

  

transferring all of Oi’s shares to another company, known as an “incorporação de ações” under the Brazilian Corporate Law;

 

  

participating in a centralized group of companies (grupo de sociedades) as defined under the Brazilian Corporate Law and subject to the conditions set forth in the Brazilian Corporate Law;

 

dissolving or liquidating Oi or canceling any ongoing liquidation;

 

  

creating any founders’ shares (partes beneficiárias) entitling the holders thereof to participate in Oi’s profits; and

 

spinning-off of all or any part of Oi.

Decisions on the transformation of Oi into another form of company require the unanimous approval of Oi’s shareholders, including the holders of Preferred Shares.

Oi is required to give effect to shareholders’ agreements that contain provisions regarding the purchase or sale of Oi’s shares, preemptive rights to acquire Oi’s shares, the exercise of the right to vote Oi’s shares or the power to control Oi, if these agreements are filed at Oi’s headquarters in Rio de Janeiro. Brazilian Corporate Law requires the president of any meeting of shareholders or board of directors to disregard any vote taken by any of the parties to any shareholders’ agreement that has been duly filed with Oi that violates the provisions of any such agreement. In the event that a shareholder that is party to a shareholders’ agreement (or a director appointed by such shareholder) is absent from any meeting of shareholders or board of directors or abstains from voting, the other party or parties to that shareholders’ agreement have the right to vote the shares of the absent or abstaining shareholder (or on behalf of the absent director) in compliance with that shareholders’ agreement. Currently, noNo shareholders’ agreement affecting Oi’s shares has been filed at Oi’s headquarters in Rio de Janeiro.

Under the Brazilian Corporate Law, neither Oi’sby-laws nor actions taken at a shareholders’ meeting may deprive any of Oi’s shareholders of certain specific rights, including:

 

the right to participate in the distribution of Oi’s profits;

 

the right to participate in any remaining residual assets in the event of Oi’s liquidation;

 

the right to supervise the management of Oi’s corporate business as specified in the Brazilian Corporate Law;

 

the right to preemptive rights in the event of an issuance of Oi’s shares, debentures convertible into Oi’s shares or subscription bonuses, other than as provided in the Brazilian Corporate Law; and

 

the right to withdraw from Oi under the circumstances specified in the Brazilian Corporate Law.

Voting Rights of Minority Shareholders

Shareholders holding shares representing not less than 5% of Oi’s voting shares have the right to request that Oi adopt a cumulative voting procedure for the election of the members of Oi’s board of directors. This procedure must be requested by the required number of shareholders at least 48 hours prior to a shareholders’ meeting.

Under the Brazilian Corporate Law, shareholders that are not controlling shareholders, but that together hold either:

 

Preferred Shares representing at least 10% of Oi’s total share capital; or

 

Common Shares representing at least 15% of Oi’s voting capital,

have the right to appoint one member to Oi’s board of directors at Oi’s annual shareholders’ meeting. If no group of holders of Common Shares or Preferred Shares meets the thresholds described above, shareholders holding Common Shares or Preferred Shares representing at least 10% of Oi’s total share capital are entitled to combine their holdings to appoint one member to Oi’s board of directors. In the event that minority holders of Common Shares and/or holders ofnon-voting Preferred Shares elect a director and the cumulative voting procedures described above are also used, Oi’s controlling shareholders, if any, always retain the right to elect at least one member more than the number of members elected by the other shareholders, regardless of the total number of members of Oi’s board of directors. The shareholders seeking to exercise these minority rights must prove that they have held their shares for not less than three months preceding the shareholders’ meeting at which the director will be appointed.

Under Oi’sby-laws, holders of Preferred Shares may appoint, by separate voting, one board member.

In accordance with the Brazilian Corporate Law, the holders of Preferred Shares are entitled to elect one effective member and anthe respective alternate to Oi’s fiscal council in a separate election. Minority shareholders have the same right as long as they jointly represent 10% or more of the voting shares. The other shareholders with the right to vote may elect the remaining members and alternates of the fiscal council, who, in any event, must exceed the number more thanof members elected in the directors and alternates electedseparate election by the holders of Preferred Shares and the minority shareholders.

Voting Rights of Preferred Shares

Holders of Preferred Shares are not entitled to vote on any matter, except:

 

with respect to the election of a member of Oi’s board of directors by holders of Preferred Shares holding at least 10% of Oi’s total share capital as described above;

 

with respect to the election of a member and alternate member of Oi’s fiscal council as described above;

with respect to the approval of the contracting of foreign entities related to the controlling shareholders of Oi, if any, to provide management services, including technical assistance. In these cases, Preferred Shares will have the right to vote separately from the Common Shares;

 

with respect to the approval of the contracting of foreign entities related to the controlling shareholders of Oi, if any, to provide management services, including technical assistance, the remuneration for which shall not exceed 0.1% of Oi’s consolidated annual sales for fixed switched telephone service, net of taxes; and

 

in the limited circumstances described below.

The Brazilian Corporate Law and Oi’sby-laws provide that our Preferred Shares will acquire unrestricted voting rights and will be entitled to vote together with our Common Shares on all matters put to a vote in Oi’s shareholders’ meetings if the Minimum Preferred Dividend (as determined in accordance with Oi’sby-laws and Brazilian Corporate Law) is not paid for a period of three years. As a result of Oi’s failure to pay the Minimum Preferred Dividend for 2014, 2015 and 2016, holders of our Preferred Shares obtained full voting rights on April 28, 2017, the date that Oi’s annual shareholders’ meeting approved our financial statements for fiscal year 2016.

This voting right will continue until the date on which Oi pays the Minimum Preferred Dividend for the then-most recently completed fiscal year. During the period during which holders of Preferred Shares are entitled to vote together with Common Shares, holders of Preferred Shares will not be entitled to the separate votes described above with respect to the election of a member of Oi’s board of directors, a member and alternate member of Oi’s fiscal council, the approval of the contracting of foreign entities, or decisions relating to the employment of foreign entities.

Liquidation

Oi may be liquidated in accordance with the provisions of Brazilian law. In the event of Oi’s extrajudicial liquidation, a shareholders’ meeting will determine the manner of Oi’s liquidation and appoint Oi’s liquidator and Oi’s fiscal council that will function during the liquidation period.

Upon Oi’s liquidation, Preferred Shares do not have a liquidation preference over Common Shares in respect of the distribution of Oi’s net assets, but shall be entitled to unrestricted voting rights. In the event of Oi’s liquidation, the assets available for distribution to Oi’s shareholders would be distributed to Oi’s shareholders in an amount equal to theirpro rata share of Oi’s legal capital. If the assets to be so distributed are insufficient to fully compensate all of Oi’s shareholders for their legal capital, each of Oi’s shareholders would receive apro rataamount (based on theirpro ratashare of Oi’s legal capital) of any assets available for distribution.

Preemptive Rights

Under the Brazilian Corporate Law, each of Oi’s shareholders has a general preemptive right to subscribe for Oi’s shares or securities convertible into Oi’s shares in any capital increase, in proportion to the number of Oi’s shares held by such shareholder.

Under Oi’sby-laws, Oi’s board of directors or Oi’s shareholders, as the case may be, may decide not to extend preemptive rights to Oi’s shareholders with respect to any issuance of Oi’s shares, debentures convertible into Oi’s shares or warrants made in connection with a public exchange made to acquire control of another company or in connection with a public offering or sale through a stock exchange. The preemptive rights are transferable and must be exercised within a period of at least 30 days following the publication of notice of the issuance of shares or securities convertible into Oi’s shares. Holders of ADSs may not be able to exercise the preemptive rights relating to Oi’s shares underlying their ADSs unless a registration statement under the Securities Act is effective with respect to those rights or an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act is available. Oi is not obligated to file a registration statement with respect to the shares relating to these preemptive rights or to take any other action to make preemptive rights available to holders of ADSs, and Oi is not required to file any such registration statement.

Redemption, Amortization, Tender Offers and Rights of Withdrawal

Oi’sby-laws or Oi’s shareholders at a shareholders’ meeting may authorize Oi to use its profits or reserves to redeem or amortize Oi’s shares in accordance with conditions and procedures established for such redemption or amortization. The Brazilian Corporate Law defines “redemption” (resgate de ações) as the payment of the value of the shares in order to permanently remove such shares from circulation, with or without a corresponding reduction of Oi’s share capital. The Brazilian Corporate Law defines “amortization” (amortização) as the distribution to the shareholders, without a corresponding capital reduction, of amounts that they would otherwise receive if Oi were liquidated. If an amortization distribution has been paid prior to Oi’s liquidation, then upon Oi’s liquidation, the shareholders who did not receive an amortization distribution will have a preference equal to the amount of the amortization distribution in the distribution of Oi’s capital.

The Brazilian Corporate Law authorizes Oi’s shareholders to approve in a shareholders’ meeting the redemption of Oi’s shares not held by Oi’s controlling shareholders, if any, if after a tender offer effected for the purpose of delisting Oi as a publicly held company, Oi’s controlling shareholders, if any, increase their participation in Oi’s total share capital to more than 95%. The redemption price in such case would be the same price paid for Oi’s shares in any such tender offer.

The Brazilian Corporate Law and Oi’sby-laws also require the acquirer of control (in case of a change of control) or the controller (in case of delisting or a substantial reduction in liquidity of Oi’s shares) to make a tender offer for the acquisition of the shares held by minority shareholders under certain circumstances described below under “—Mandatory Tender Offers.” The shareholder can also withdraw its capital from Oi under certain circumstances described below under “—Rights of Withdrawal.”

Mandatory Tender Offers

The Brazilian Corporate Law requires that if the Common Shares are delisted from the B3 or there is a substantial reduction in liquidity of the Common Shares, as defined by the CVM, in each case as a result of purchases by Oi’s controlling shareholders, Oi’s controlling shareholders must effect a tender offer for acquisition of the remaining Common Shares at a purchase price equal to the fair value of the Common Shares taking into account the total number of outstanding Common Shares. Oi’sby-laws require the cancellation of Oi’s registration as a public company with the CVM or Oi’s delisting from the Level 1 Corporate Governance Listing Segment of the B3 be preceded by a public tender offer for acquisition of the all of the capital stock of Oi based on a fair market valuation of Oi’s capital stock, in accordance with the Brazilian Corporate Law and the regulations issued by the CVM. The requirement to conduct a mandatory tender offer preceding Oi’s delisting from the Level 1 Corporate Governance Listing Segment of the B3 may be avoided if Oi instead joins theNovo Mercadoor Level 2 Corporate Governance Listing Segment of the B3 or, certain conditions being met, in the case of a voluntary withdrawal from the Level 1 Corporate Governance Listing Segment of the B3.

Oi’sby-laws require that any transaction or series of transactions that results in a change of control of Oi be preceded by a public offer for the purchase of all of Oi’s capital stock by the prospective purchaser in order to ensure the equitable treatment of all of Oi’s shareholders, in accordance with the rules of theNovo Mercadosegment of the B3.

Rights of Withdrawal

The Brazilian Corporate Law provides that, in certain limited circumstances, a dissenting shareholder may withdraw its equity interest from Oi and be reimbursed by Oi for the value of the Common Shares or Preferred Shares that it then holds.

This right of withdrawal may be exercised by the dissenting ornon-voting holders (including any holder of Preferred Shares) in the event that the holders of a majority of all outstanding Common Shares authorize:

 

a reduction of the mandatory dividend set forth in Oi’sby-laws;

to create Preferred Shares or to increase the existing classes of Preferred Shares, without maintaining the proportion with the remaining classes of Preferred Shares, except if provided for and authorized in theby-laws, subject to the conditions set forth in the Brazilian Corporate Law;

 

changes in the preferences, advantages and conditions of redemption or amortization of one or more classes of Preferred Shares, or the creation of a new class with greater privileges, subject to the conditions set forth in the Brazilian Corporate Law;

 

Oi’s participation in a centralized group of companies;

 

to merge into another company or to consolidate with another company, subject to the conditions set forth in the Brazilian Corporate Law;

a change in Oi’s corporate purpose;

 

spinning off of all or any part of Oi, if suchspin-off results in (1) a change in Oi’s business purpose (except if thespun-off assets revert to a company whose main purpose is the same as Oi’s), (2) a reduction of the mandatory dividend set forth in Oi’sby-laws, or (3) Oi’s participation in a centralized group of companies; or

 

in one of the following transactions in which the shares held by such holders do not meet liquidity and dispersion thresholds under the Brazilian Corporate Law:

 

 

the merger of Oi with another company, or the consolidation of Oi, in a transaction in which Oi is not the surviving entity;

 

 

the transfer of all of the outstanding shares of another company to Oi in anincorporação de ações transaction; or

 

 

Oi’s participation in a centralized group of companies.

Dissenting ornon-voting shareholders are also entitled to withdraw in the event that the entity resulting from a merger orspin-off does not have its shares listed in an exchange or traded in the secondary market within 120 days from the shareholders’ meeting that approved the relevant merger orspin-off.

Notwithstanding the above, in the event that Oi is consolidated or merged with another company, becomes part of a centralized group of companies, or acquires the control of another company for a price in excess of certain limits imposed by the Brazilian Corporate Law, holders of any type or class of Oi’s shares or the shares of the resulting entity that have minimal market liquidity and are dispersed among a sufficient number of shareholders will not have the right to withdraw. For this purpose, shares that are part of the IBOVESPAIbovespa index are considered liquid, and sufficient dispersion will exist if the controlling shareholder, the parent company or other companies under its control hold less than half of the total number of outstanding shares of that type or class. In case of aspin-off, the right of withdrawal will only exist if (1) there is a change in the corporate purpose, (2) there is a reduction in the mandatory dividend, or (3) thespin-off results in Oi’s participation in a centralized group of companies.

Only shareholders who own shares on the date of publication of the first notice convening the relevant shareholders’ meeting or the material fact notice concerning the relevant transaction is published, whichever is earlier, will be entitled to withdrawal rights. Shareholders will only be entitled to exercise withdrawal rights with respect to the shares held by them from such date until the date withdrawal rights are exercised.

The redemption of shares arising out of the exercise of any withdrawal rights would be made at the book value of the shares, determined on the basis of Oi’s most recent audited balance sheet approved by Oi’s shareholders. If the shareholders’ meeting approving the action that gave rise to withdrawal rights occurred more than 60 days after the date of the most recent approved audited balance sheet, a shareholder may demand that its shares be valued on the basis of a balance sheet prepared specifically for this purpose.

The right of withdrawal lapses 30 days after the date of publication of the minutes of the shareholders’ meeting that approved the action that gave rise to withdrawal rights, except when the resolution is approved pending confirmation by the holders of Preferred Shares (such confirmation to be given at an extraordinary meeting of such holders of Preferred Shares to be held within one year). In this event, the30-day period for dissenting shareholders begins at the date of publication of the minutes of the extraordinary meeting of such holders of Preferred Shares. Oi’s shareholders may reconsider any resolution giving rise to withdrawal rights within 10 days after the expiration of the exercise period of withdrawal rights if Oi’s management believes that the withdrawal of shares of dissenting shareholders would jeopardize Oi’s financial stability.

Liability of Oi’s Shareholders for Further Capital Calls

Neither Brazilian law nor Oi’sby-laws require any capital calls. Oi’s shareholders’ liability for capital calls is limited to the payment of the issue price of any shares subscribed or acquired.

Inspection of Corporate Records

Shareholders that own 5% or more of Oi’s outstanding share capital have the right to inspect Oi’s corporate records, including shareholders’ lists, corporate minutes, financial records and other documents of Oi, if (1) Oi or any of its officers or directors have committed any act contrary to Brazilian law or Oi’sby-laws, or (2) there are grounds to suspect that there are material irregularities in Oi. However, in either case, the shareholder that desires to inspect Oi’s corporate records must obtain a court order authorizing the inspection.

Disclosures of Share Ownership

Brazilian regulations require that (1) each of Oi’s direct or indirect controlling shareholders, if any, and (2) any person or group of persons representing a person that has directly or indirectly acquired or sold an interest that would result in an increase or decrease corresponding to 5%, or any 5% multiple thereof, of the total number of Oi’s shares of any type or class to disclose its or their share ownership or divestment to Oi, and Oi is responsible for transmitting such information to the CVM and the market. In addition, if a share acquisition results in, or is made with the intention of, change of control or company’s management structure, as well as acquisitions that cause the obligation of performing a tender offer, the persons acquiring such number of shares are required to publish a statement containing certain required information about such acquisition.

Oi’s controlling shareholders, if any, members of Oi’s board of directors, board of executive officers, fiscal council and members of other bodies created pursuant to Oi’sby-laws with technical or consulting functions must file a statement of any change in their holdings of Oi’s shares with the CVM and the Brazilian stock exchanges on which Oi’s securities are traded. Oi also must disclose any trading of its shares by Oi or Oi’s controlled or related companies.

Form and Transfer

Common Shares and Preferred Shares are in book-entry form, registered in the name of each shareholder or its nominee. The transfer of Oi’s shares is governed by Article 35 of the Brazilian Corporate Law, which provides that a transfer of shares is effected by Oi’s transfer agent, Banco do Brasil S.A., by an entry made by the transfer agent in its books, upon presentation of valid written share transfer instructions to Oi by a transferor or its representative. When Common Shares or Preferred Shares are acquired or sold on a Brazilian stock exchange, the transfer is effected on the records of Oi’s transfer agent by a representative of a brokerage firm or the stock exchange’s clearing system. The transfer agent also performs all the services of safe-keeping of Oi’s shares. Provided that the provisions of Resolution No. 4,373 are observed, transfers of Oi’s shares by anon-Brazilian investor are made in the same manner and are executed on the investor’s behalf by the investor’s local agent. If the original investment was registered with the Brazilian Central Bank pursuant to foreign investment regulations, thenon-Brazilian investor is also required to amend, if necessary, through its local agent, the electronic certificate of registration to reflect the new ownership.

The B3 operates a central clearing system, the CSD. A holder of Oi’s shares may choose, at its discretion, to participate in this system, and all shares that such shareholder elects to be put into the clearing system are deposited in custody with the CSD (through a Brazilian institution that is duly authorized to operate by the Brazilian Central Bank and maintains a clearing account with the CSD). Shares subject to the custody of the CSD are noted as such in Oi’s registry of shareholders. Each participating shareholder will, in turn, be registered in the register of the CSD and will be treated in the same manner as shareholders registered in Oi’s books.

Material Contracts

We have not entered into any material contracts, other than those described in this annual report or entered into in the ordinary course of business.

Exchange Controls

There are no restrictions on ownership or voting of Oi’s capital stock by individuals or legal entities domiciled outside Brazil. However, the right to convert dividend payments, payments of interest on shareholders’ equity and proceeds from the sale of Oi’s share capital into foreign currency and to remit such amounts outside Brazil is subject to exchange control restrictions under foreign investment legislation and foreign exchange regulations, which generally require, among other things, the registration of the relevant investment with the Brazilian Central Bank and/or the CVM, as the case may be.

Investments in Common Shares or Preferred Shares by (1) aNon-Brazilian Holder who is registered with the CVM under Annex I of Resolution No. 4,373, or (2) the depositary, are eligible for registration with the Brazilian Central Bank. This registration (the amount so registered is referred to as registered capital) allows the remittance outside Brazil of foreign currency, converted at the market rate, acquired with the proceeds of distributions on, and amounts realized through, dispositions of Common Shares or Preferred Shares.

The registered capital per newly issued Common Share or Preferred Share purchased in the form of an ADS, or purchased in Brazil under Annex I of Resolution No. 4,373 and deposited with the depositary in exchange for an ADS, will be equal to its purchase price and to the market value of the corresponding shares on the date of the deposit, respectively.

The registered capital under Annex I of Resolution No. 4,373 per Common Share or Preferred Share withdrawn upon cancellation of a corresponding ADS will be the U.S. dollar equivalent of the market value of the Common Share or Preferred Share, as the case may be, on the B3 on the day of withdrawal. Such cancellation is also subject to the execution of simultaneous foreign exchange agreements without the actual inflow and outflow of funds to and from Brazil, or the Symbolic FX Agreements. The U.S. dollar equivalent will be determined upon the execution of the Symbolic FX Agreement.

Foreign Direct Investment and Portfolio Investment

Investors (individuals, legal entities, mutual funds and other collective investment entities) domiciled, residing or headquartered outside Brazil may register their investments in Oi’s shares as foreign portfolio investments under Annex I of Resolution No. 4,373 (described below) or as foreign direct investments under Law No. 4,131 (described below). Registration under Annex I of Resolution No. 4,373 or Law No. 4,131 generally enables the conversion of dividends, other distributions and sales proceeds received in connection with registered investments into foreign currency and the remittance of such amounts outside Brazil. Registration under Annex I of Resolution No. 4,373 affords favorable tax treatment tonon-Brazilian portfolio investors who are not resident in a Favorable Tax Jurisdiction, which is defined by Brazilian tax legislation as any country or location that: (1) does not tax income, or taxes income at a rate lower than 20% (or 17% in the case of countries or regimes abiding by the international policy for tax transparency); or (2) does not disclose or imposes restrictions on the disclosure of certain information concerning the shareholding composition of a legal entity, its ownership or the effective beneficiary of income attributable to the foreigners. See “—Taxation—Brazilian Tax Considerations.”

Annex I of Resolution No. 4,373

All investments made by anon-Brazilian investor under Annex I of Resolution No. 4,373 are subject to an electronic registration with the Brazilian Central Bank. This registration permits the conversion of dividend payments, payments of interest on shareholders’ equity and proceeds from the sale of Oi’s share capital into foreign currency and the remission of such amounts outside Brazil.

Under Annex I of Resolution No. 4,373,non-Brazilian investors registered with the CVM may invest in almost all financial assets and engage in almost all transactions available to Brazilian investors in the Brazilian financial and capital markets without obtaining a separate Brazilian Central Bank registration for each transaction, provided that certain requirements are fulfilled. Under Annex I of Resolution No. 4,373, the definition of anon-Brazilian investor includes individuals, legal entities, mutual funds and other collective investment entities domiciled or headquartered outside Brazil.

Pursuant to Annex I of Resolution No. 4,373,non-Brazilian investors must:

 

appoint at least one representative in Brazil with powers to take action relating to its investments, which must be a financial institution duly authorized by the Brazilian Central Bank;

 

appoint an authorized custodian in Brazil for its investments, which must be an institution duly authorized by the CVM;

 

complete the appropriate foreign investor registration forms;

 

appoint a tax representative in Brazil;

 

through its representative, register as anon-Brazilian investor with the CVM;

 

through its representative, register its investments with the Brazilian Central Bank; and

 

obtain a taxpayer identification number from the Brazilian federal tax authorities.

The securities and other financial assets held by anon-Brazilian investor pursuant to Annex I of Resolution No. 4,373 must be registered or maintained in deposit accounts or under the custody of an entity duly licensed by the Brazilian Central Bank or the CVM, as applicable, or be registered in registration, clearing and custody systems authorized by the Brazilian Central Bank or by the CVM, as applicable. Subject to limited exceptions provided in the CVM regulation or previous CVM authorization, the trading of securities held under Annex I of Resolution No. 4,373 is restricted to transactions carried out on stock exchanges or through organizedover-the-counter markets licensed by the CVM.

The offshore transfer or assignment of the securities or other financial assets held bynon-Brazilian investors pursuant to Annex I of Resolution No. 4,373 are prohibited, except for transfers (1) resulting from consolidation,spin-off, merger or merger of shares or occurring upon the death of an investor by operation of law or will; (2) resulting from a corporate reorganization effected abroad, as long as the final beneficiaries and the amount of the assets remain the same, or (3) authorized by the CVM.

Annex II of Resolution No. 4,373 – ADSs

Annex II of Resolution No. 4,373 of the National Monetary Council provides for the issuance of depositary receipts in foreign markets in respect of shares of Brazilian issuers. The Common ADS program was approved by the Brazilian Central Bank and the CVM prior to the issuance of the Common ADSs. Accordingly, as a general rule, the proceeds from the sale of Common ADSs bynon-Brazilian resident holders of Common ADSs outside Brazil are not subject to Brazilian foreign investment controls, and holders of Common ADSs who are not domiciled in a “FavorableFavorable Tax Haven Jurisdiction”Jurisdiction are entitled to favorable tax treatment. See “—Taxation—Brazilian Tax Considerations—Taxation of Gains.”

Oi pays dividends and other cash distributions with respect to the Common Shares inreais. Oi has obtained electronic certificates of foreign capital registration from the Brazilian Central Bank in the name of the depositary of the Common ADS Depositaryprogram to be maintained by the custodian of the Common ADS Custodian.program. Pursuant to this registration, the ADS Custodian is able to convert dividends and other distributions with respect to Common Shares represented by Common ADSs into foreign currency and remit the proceeds outside Brazil to the depositary of the Common ADS Depositaryprogram so that the depositary of the Common ADS Depositaryprogram may distribute these proceeds to the holders of record of the Common ADSs.

In the event that a holder of Common ADSs exchanges those Common ADSs for the underlying Common Shares, the holder must:

 

convert its investment in those shares into a foreign portfolio investment under Annex I of Resolution No. 4,373, subject to the execution of Symbolic FX Agreements; or

 

convert its investment in those shares into a direct foreign investment under Law No. 4,131, subject to the execution of Symbolic FX Agreements.

The custodian of the Common ADS Custodianprogram is authorized to update the electronic registration of the depositary of the Common ADS Depositaryprogram to reflect conversions of Common ADSs into foreign portfolio investments under Resolution No. 4,373.

If a holder of Common ADSs elects to convert its Common ADSs into a foreign portfolio investment under Annex I of Resolution No. 4,373 or into a foreign direct investment under Law No. 4,131, the conversion will be effected before the Brazilian Central Bank by the custodian after receipt of an electronic request from the depositary with details of the transaction. If a foreign direct investor under Law No. 4,131 elects to deposit its Common Shares into the Common ADS program in exchange for Common ADSs, such holder will be required to present to the ADS Custodian evidence of payment of capital gains taxes and of the execution of Symbolic FX Agreements. See “—Taxation—Brazilian Tax Considerations—Taxation of Gains” for details of the tax consequences to an investor residing outside Brazil of investing in Common Shares or Preferred Shares in Brazil.

If a holder of Common ADSs wishes to convert its investment in Common Shares into either a foreign portfolio investment under Annex I of Resolution No. 4,373 or a foreign direct investment under Law No. 4,131, it should begin the process of obtaining its own foreign investor registration with the Brazilian Central Bank or with the CVM, as the case may be, in advance of exchanging the Common ADSs for the underlying Common Shares. ANon-Brazilian Holder of Common Shares may experience delays in obtaining a foreign investor registration, which may delay remittances outside Brazil, which may in turn adversely affect the amount, in U.S. dollars, received by theNon-Brazilian Holder.

Unless the holder has registered its investment with the Brazilian Central Bank, the holder may not be able to convert the proceeds from the disposition of, or distributions with respect to, such Common Shares into foreign currency or remit those proceeds outside Brazil. In addition, if thenon-Brazilian investor is domiciled in a Favorable Tax Jurisdiction or is not an investor registered under Annex I of Resolution No. 4,373, the investor will be subject to less favorable tax treatment than a holder of Common ADSs. See “—Taxation—Brazilian Tax Considerations.”

Law 4,131

To obtain a certificate of foreign capital registration from the Brazilian Central Bank under Law No. 4,131, a foreign direct investor must:

 

register as a foreign direct investor with the Brazilian Central Bank;

 

obtain a taxpayer identification number from the Brazilian tax authorities;

 

appoint a tax representative in Brazil; and

 

appoint a representative in Brazil for service of process in respect of suits based on the Brazilian Corporate Law.

Foreign direct investors under Law No. 4,131 may sell their shares in either private or open market transactions, but these investors will generally be subject to less favorable tax treatment on gains with respect to Common Shares. See “—Taxation—Brazilian Tax Considerations.”

Taxation

The following discussion contains a description of the material Brazilian and U.S. federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs. The following discussion does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all the tax considerations that may be relevant to a decision to purchase, hold or dispose of Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs. This discussion is based upon the tax laws of Brazil and the United States and regulations under these tax laws as currently in effect, which are subject to change.

Although there is at present no income tax treaty between Brazil and the United States, the tax authorities of the two countries have had discussions that may culminate in such a treaty. No assurance can be given, however, as to whether or when a treaty will enter into force or how it will affect the U.S. holders of Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs.

Prospective purchasers of Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs should consult their own tax advisors as to the tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs in their particular circumstances.

Brazilian Tax Considerations

The following discussion contains a description of the material Brazilian tax consequences, subject to the limitations set forth herein, of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs by a holder not deemed to be domiciled in Brazil for Brazilian tax and regulatory purposes (a“Non-Brazilian Holder”). This discussion is based on the tax laws of Brazil and regulations thereunder in effect on the date hereof, which are subject to change (possibly with retroactive effect). This discussion does not specifically address all of the Brazilian tax considerations that may be applicable to any particularNon-Brazilian Holder. Therefore, eachNon-Brazilian Holder should consult its own tax advisor about the Brazilian tax consequences of an investment in Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs.

Individuals domiciled in Brazil and Brazilian companies are taxed in Brazil on the basis of their worldwide income which includes earnings of Brazilian companies’ foreign subsidiaries, branches and affiliates. The earnings of branches of foreign companies andnon-Brazilian residents, or nonresidents, in general are taxed in Brazil only on income derived from Brazilian sources.

Pursuant to Brazilian law, thenon-resident holder may invest in Common Shares or Preferred Shares under Resolution 4,373, of September 2014, of the National Monetary Council (a “4,373 Holder”).

Dividends

DividendsAs of the date of this annual report, dividends paid by a Brazilian corporation, such as Oi, in cash or in kind, including stock dividends and other dividends paid to aNon-Brazilian Holder of Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs are currently not subject to withholding income tax in Brazil to the extent that such amounts are related to profits generated after January 1, 1996. Dividends paid from profits generated before January 1, 1996 may be subject to Brazilian withholding income tax at varying rates, according to the tax legislation applicable to each corresponding year.

Law No. 11,638, dated December 28, 2007, significantly modified Brazilian Corporate Law in order to align the generally accepted Brazilian accounting standards to the IFRS. Nonetheless, Law No. 11,941, dated May 27, 2009, introduced the Transitory Tax Regime (regime tributário de transição – “RTT”), in order to render neutral, from a tax perspective, all changes provided by Law No. 11,638. Under the RTT, Brazilian companies, for tax purposes, should observe the accounting rules and criteria as in force on December 31, 2007.

Profits determined pursuant to Law 11,638(“IFRS Profits”), may differ from the profits calculated pursuant to the accounting methods and criteria as effective on December 31, 2007 (“2007 Profits”).

While it was general market practice to distribute exempted dividends with reference to the IFRS Profits, Normative Ruling No. 1,397, issued by the Brazilian tax authorities on September 16, 2013, has established that legal entities should observe the accounting methods and criteria in force on December 31, 2007, or 2007 Profits, in order to determine the amount of profits that could be distributed as exempted income to its beneficiaries.

Any profits paid in excess of said 2007 Profits (“Excess Dividends”), should, in the tax authorities’ view, and in the specific case ofnon-resident beneficiaries, be subject to the following rules of taxation: (1) 15% WHT, in case of beneficiaries domiciled abroad, but not in a Favorable Tax Jurisdiction (as defined below), and (2) 25% WHT, in the case of beneficiaries domiciled in a Favorable Tax Jurisdiction (as defined below).

In order to mitigate potential disputes on the subject, Law No. 12,973, dated May 13, 2014, in addition to revoking the RTT, introduced a new set of tax rules (“the New Brazilian Tax Regime”), including new provisions with respect to Excess Dividends. Under these new provisions: (1) Excess Dividends related to profits assessed from 2008 to 2013 are exempt; (2) potential disputes remain concerning the Excess Dividends related to 2014 profits, unless our company had voluntarily elected to apply the New Brazilian Tax Regime in 2014; and (3) as of 2015, as the New Brazilian Tax Regime is mandatory and has completely replaced the RTT, dividends calculated based on IFRS standards should be considered fully exempt.

Interest on Shareholders’ Equity

Law No. 9,249, dated December 26, 1995, as amended, allows a Brazilian corporation, such as Oi, to make distributions to shareholders of interest on shareholders’ equity on top of or as an alternative to making dividend distributions, and treat those payments as a deductible expense for purposes of calculating Brazilian corporate income tax, and, since 1998, social contribution on net profit as well, as long as the limits described below are observed.observed and the payment is approved at a general meeting of shareholders. These distributions may be paid in cash. For tax purposes, the deductible amount of thissuch interest is limited to the daily pro rata variation ofare calculated by multiplying the TJLP, as determined by the Brazilian Central Bank from time to time, andby the sum of determined Brazilian company’s net equity accounts. The amount of the deduction may not exceed the greater of:

 

50% of net income (after the deduction of social contribution on net profit but before taking into account the provision for corporate income tax and the amounts attributable to shareholders as interest on shareholders’ equity) for the period in respect of which the payment is made; and

 

50% of the sum of retained profits and incomeprofits reserves as of the date of the beginning of the period in respect of which the payment is made.

Payment of interest on shareholders’ equity to aNon-Brazilian Holder is subject to withholding income tax at the rate of 15%, or 25% if theNon-Brazilian Holder is domiciled in a country or location that is considered to be a “tax haven” jurisdiction. For this purpose, the definition of “tax haven” jurisdiction encompasses countries and locations (1) that do not impose income tax, (2) that impose income tax at a rate of 20% or less, or (3) where local laws do not allow access to information related to shareholding composition, ownership of investments, or the identity of the beneficial owners of earnings that are attributed tonon-residents.Favorable Tax Jurisdiction.

On November 28, 2014, the Brazilian Revenue Service issued Rule No. 488, which reduces the threshold income tax rate for determining a “tax haven jurisdiction” from 20% to 17%. Please refer to “—Discussion on Definition of ‘Tax Haven’ Jurisdictions” below for a discussion that the definition of “tax haven” jurisdiction may be broadened by an interpretation of Law No. 11,727. These payments of interest on shareholders’ equity may be included, at their net value, as part of any mandatory dividend. To the extent payment of interest on net equity is so included, Oi is required to distribute to shareholders an additional amount to ensure that the net amount received by them, after payment of the applicable withholding income tax, plus the amount of declared dividends, is at least equal to the mandatory dividend.

Payments of interest on shareholders’ equity are decided by Oi’s shareholders, at its annual shareholders meeting, on the basis of recommendations of its board of directors. No assurance can be given that Oi’s board of directors will not recommend that future distributions of profits should be made by means of interest on shareholders’ equity instead of by means of dividends.

Discussion on Definition of Favorable Tax Jurisdiction

Under Brazilian tax law, a Favorable Tax Jurisdiction is defined as a country or location that (a) does not impose taxation on income, or (b) imposes the income tax at a maximum rate lower than 20%, or (c) local legislation does not allow access to information related to shareholding composition, ownership of investments, or the identity of the beneficial owners of earnings that are attributed to non-resident. Please note that the statutory definition of a Favorable Tax Jurisdiction for the purpose of income taxation on gains should differ depending on whether or not the holder is a 4,373 Holder. In the case of a 4,373 Holder, the definition of Favorable Tax Jurisdiction should not comprise jurisdictions mentioned in item (c). However, the list of Favorable Tax Jurisdictions provided for in Normative Instruction No. 1,037/10 does not seem to differ the Favorable Tax Jurisdiction definition for the purposes of 4,373 Holders.

On June 23, 2008, Law No. 11,727 introduced the concept of Privileged Tax Regimes (“PTRs”), which encompasses the countries and jurisdictions that: (1) do not tax income or tax it at a maximum rate lower than 20% or 17% in certain cases as detailed below; (2) grant tax advantages to anon-resident entity or individual (a) without the need to carry out a substantial economic activity in the country or a said territory or (b) conditioned on thenon-exercise of a substantial economic activity in the country or a said territory; (3) do not tax or taxes proceeds generated abroad or taxes such proceeds at a maximum rate lower than 20% or 17% in certain cases as detailed below; or (4) restrict the ownership disclosure of assets and ownership rights or restricts disclosure about economic transactions carried out within its territory. Normative Ruling No. 1,037/10, as amended, also provided a list of the PTRs.

In the past, it was not clear whether the concept of PTR was also applicable to interest payments made to residents outside Brazil. Notwithstanding, in December 2017, the Brazilian Federal Revenue Service published Ruling No. 575/2017, stating that only payments to countries deemed as Favorable Tax Jurisdictions by Normative Ruling No. 1,037 would be subject to withholding tax at a 25% rate. Nevertheless, we cannot assure you that subsequent legislation or interpretations by the Brazilian tax authorities regarding the definition of a PTR provided by Law No. 9,430, of December 27, 1996, altered by Law No. 11,727, will also apply to aNon-Brazilian Holder on payments of interest on shareholders’ equity.

Notwithstanding the above, we recommend that you consult your own tax advisors regarding the consequences of the implementation of Law No. 11,727, Normative Ruling No. 1,037/10 and of any related Brazilian tax law or regulation concerning Favorable Tax Jurisdictions or PTRs.

On November 28, 2014, the Ministry of Treasury issued Ordinance No. 488, which reduces the threshold income tax rate for determining a Favorable Tax Jurisdiction and PTRs from 20% to 17%. The reduced 17% threshold applies only to countries and regimes aligned with international standards of fiscal transparency in accordance with rules to be established by the Brazilian tax authorities in Normative Ruling No. 1,530, dated December 19, 2014. Normative Ruling No. 1,530/14 provides that compliance with such standards requires: (1) signature or negotiations completion for a treaty or agreement allowing the exchange of information related to identification of income beneficiaries, shareholding structure, ownership of goods or rights, or economic transactions that are carried out; and (2) commitment to the criteria set out in internationalanti-tax evasion forums of which Brazil is a member, such as the Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information. Normative Ruling No. 1,037/10 is regularly updated by tax authorities.

Taxation of Gains

Under Law No. 10,833, enacted on December 29, 2003, the gain on the disposition or sale of assets located in Brazil by aNon-Brazilian Holder, whether to anothernon-Brazilian resident or to a Brazilian resident, may be subject to withholding income tax on capital gains in Brazil.

With respect to the disposition of Common Shares or Preferred Shares, as they are assets located in Brazil, theNon-Brazilian Holder should be subject to withholding income tax on the gains assessed, following the rules described below, regardless of whether the transactions are conducted in Brazil or with a Brazilian resident.

With respect to Oi’s ADSs, although the matter is not entirely clear, arguably the gains realized by aNon-Brazilian Holder upon the disposition of ADSs will not be taxed in Brazil, on the basis that ADSs are not “assets located in Brazil” for the purposes of Law No. 10,833. We cannot assure you, however, that the Brazilian tax authorities or the Brazilian courts will agree with this interpretation.interpretation, considering the general and unclear scope of Law No. 10,833 and the absence of judicial guidance in respect thereof. As a result, gains on a disposition of ADSs by aNon-Brazilian Holder to a Brazilian resident, or even to anon-Brazilian resident, in the event that courts determine that ADSs would constitute assets located in Brazil, may be subject to income tax in Brazil according to the rules applicable to Common Shares and Preferred Shares, described below.

As a general rule, gains realized as a result of a disposition of Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs are the positive difference between the amount realized on the transaction and the acquisition cost of Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs.

Under Brazilian law, however, income tax rules on such gains can vary depending on the domicile of theNon-Brazilian Holder, the type of registration of the investment by theNon-Brazilian Holder with the Brazilian Central Bank and how the disposition is carried out, as described below.

Gains realized on a disposition of shares carried out on a Brazilian stock exchange (which includes the organizedover-the-counter market) are:

 

exempt from income tax when realized by aNon-Brazilian Holder that (1) has registered its investment in Brazil with the Brazilian Central Bank under the rules of Resolution No.is a 4,373 dated September 14, 2014, which replaced Resolution 2,689 dated January 26, 2000 (“4,373 Holder”),Holder, and (2) is not a resident in a country or location which is defined as a “tax haven” jurisdiction for this purposesFavorable Tax Jurisdiction (as described below)above); or

 

subject to income tax at a rate of up to 25% in any other case, including a case of gains assessed by aNon-Brazilian Holder that is not a 4,373 Holder and is a resident of a country or location defined as a “tax haven” jurisdictionFavorable Tax Jurisdiction (as described below)above). In these cases, a withholding income tax of 0.005% of the sale value will be applicable and can be later offset with the eventual income tax due on the capital gain. This 0.005% withholding income tax is not levied on day trade transactions, which are subject to a rate of 1%.

Any other gains assessed on a disposition of Common Shares or Preferred Shares that is not carried out on a Brazilian stock exchange are subject to withholding income tax at a rate of up to 25%. In the case that these gains are related to transactions conducted on the Braziliannon-organizedover-the-counter market with intermediation, income tax withholding of 0.005% will also be applicable and can be offset against the eventual income tax due on the capital gain. This 0.005% income tax withholding is not levied in day trade transactions.

As of January 2017, Law No. 13,259/2016 increased the income tax rates applicable to gains realized by Brazilian resident individuals on sale or disposition of shares not carried out on a Brazilian stock exchange from a flat tax rate of 15.0% to progressive rates varying from 15% up to 22.5%. The income tax rates recognized by Brazilian individuals’ capital gains would be: (i) 15% for the part of the gain that does not exceed R$5 million, (ii) 17.5% for the part of the gain that exceeds R$5 million but does not exceed R$10 million, (iii) 20% for the part of the gain that exceeds R$10 million but does not exceed R$30 million and (iv) 22.5% for the part of the gain that exceeds R$30 million. These increased income tax rates may also affectNon-Brazilian Holders, except for 4,373 Holders that are not resident or domiciled in tax haven jurisdictions and that carry out a sale or disposition of Common Shares or Preferred Shares in a stock exchange environment, includingover-the-counter market, which are still exempt from income tax.

In the case of redemption of securitiesCommon Shares or Preferred Shares or capital reduction by a Brazilian corporation, such as Oi, the positive difference between the amount effectively received by theNon-Brazilian Holder and the correspondingproportional acquisition cost of the redeemed assets is treated, for tax purposes, as capital gain derived from sale or exchange of shares not carried out on a Brazilian stock exchange market, and is therefore subject to withholding income tax at rates of up to 25%, as the case may be.

The deposit of Oi’s common or preferred shares in exchange for ADSs willmay be subject to Brazilian income tax on capital gains at the rate up to 25%, if the acquisition cost of the shares is lower than (1) the average price per share on a Brazilian stock exchange on which the greatest number of such shares were sold on the day of deposit, or (2) if no shares were sold on that day, the average price on the Brazilian stock exchange on which the greatest number of shares were sold in the 15 trading sessions immediately preceding such deposit. In such case, the difference between the acquisition cost and the average price of the shares calculated as above will be considered to be a capital gain subject to withholding income tax at rates of up to 25%, as the case may be.gain. In some circumstances, there may be arguments to claim that this taxation is not applicable in the case of aNon-Brazilian Holder that is a 4,373 Holder and is not a resident in a “tax haven” jurisdiction.Favorable Tax Jurisdiction. The availability of these arguments to any specific holder of Common Shares or Preferred Shares will depend on the circumstances of such holder. Prospective holders of Common Shares or Preferred Shares should consult their own tax advisors as to the tax consequences of the deposit Common Shares or Preferred Shares in exchange for ADSs.

The withdrawal of ADSs in exchange for the underlying Common Shares or Preferred Shares is not subject to Brazilian income tax, as far as the regulatory rules in respect to the registration of the investment before the Brazilian Central Bank are duly observed.

Any exercise of preemptive rights relating to Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs will not be subject to Brazilian taxation. Any gain on the sale or disposition or assignment of preemptive rights relating to Common Shares or Preferred Shares, including the sale or assignment carried out by the depositary, on behalf ofNon-Brazilian Holders of ADSs, will be subject to Brazilian income taxation according to the same rules applicable to the sale or disposition of Common Shares or Preferred Shares (see above).

Discussion Tax authorities may attempt to tax such gains even when sale or assignment of such rights takes place outside Brazil, based on Definition of “Tax Haven” Jurisdictions

Under Brazilian tax law, in the case of gains derived by 4,373 Holders, a “tax haven” jurisdiction is defined as a country or location that (a) does not impose taxation on income, or (b) imposes the income tax at a rate lower than 20%. In the case ofNon-Brazilian Holders other than 4,373 Holders, in addition to criteria (a) and (b), the definition of a “tax haven” jurisdiction should also comprise jurisdictions where local laws do not allow access to information related to shareholding composition, ownership of investments, or the identity of the beneficial owners of earnings that are attributed tonon-resident. There was a list of “tax haven” jurisdictions enacted by Brazilian tax authorities by means of Normative Ruling No. 188/2002.

On June 24, 2008, Law No. 11,727 introduced the concept of Privileged Tax Regimes (“PTRs”), which encompasses the countries and jurisdictions that: (1) do not tax income or tax it at a maximum rate lower than 20%; (2) grant tax advantages to anon-resident entity or individual (a) without the need to carry out a substantial economic activity in the country or a said territory or (b) conditioned on thenon-exercise of a substantial economic activity in the country or a said territory; (3) do not tax or taxes proceeds generated abroad at a maximum rate lower than 20.0%; or (4) restrict the ownership disclosure of assets and ownership rights or restricts disclosure about economic transactions carried out.

Consequently, on June 4, 2010, Brazilian tax authorities enacted Normative Ruling No. 1,037 listing (1) “tax haven” jurisdictions and (2) PTRs. Normative Ruling No. 188/2002 was revoked. Please note that this list does not seem to differ the “tax haven” jurisdiction definition for the purposes of 4,373 Holders and for otherNon-Brazilian Holders. Under Section 2 of Normative Ruling No. 1,037/10, companies incorporated as LLCs in the US, and companies benefiting from some holding regimes in Europe, may be considered as granting PTRs. We highlight that there would be solid legal grounds to sustain that the list should be interpreted as an exhaustive list, so that only the countries and locations listed should be viewed as “tax haven” jurisdictions and PTRs, according to their specific qualification. The interpretation of the current Brazilian tax legislation should lead to the conclusion that the concept of PTR should only apply for certain Brazilian tax purposes, such as transfer pricing and thin capitalization. According to this interpretation, the concept of PTR should not be applied in connection with the taxation of dividends, interest on shareholders’ equity and gains related to investments made byNon-Brazilian Holders in Brazilian corporations. Regulations and tax rulings issued by Brazilian federal tax authorities seem to confirm this interpretation.

Notwithstanding the above, we recommend that you consult your own tax advisors regarding the consequences of the implementationprovisions of Law No. 11,727, Normative Ruling No. 1,037/10 and of any related Brazilian10,833/03.

There can be no assurance that the current favorable tax law or regulation concerning “tax haven” jurisdictions or PTRs.

On November 28, 2014, the Brazilian Revenue Service issued Rule No. 488, which reduces the threshold income tax rate for determining a “tax haven” jurisdiction from 20%treatment to 17%. This rule also applies for purposes of the definition of PTRs. In any event, differing interpretations by the tax authorities4,373 Holders will continue in the application of this rule may result in a lower number of jurisdictions being characterized as “tax haven” jurisdiction. Furthermore, the RFB issued Normative Ruling No. 1,530/14 providing that compliance with such standards requires: (1) signature or negotiations completion for a treaty or agreement allowing the exchange of information related to identification of income beneficiaries, shareholding structure, ownership of goods or rights, or economic transactions that are carried out; and (2) commitment to the criteria set out in internationalanti-tax evasion forums of which Brazil is a member. Normative Ruling No. 1,037/10 is regularly updated by tax authorities.future.

Tax on Foreign Exchange Transactions (IOF/Exchange Tax)

Brazilian law imposes a Tax on Foreign Exchange Transactions, or IOF/Exchange Tax, on the conversion ofreais into foreign currency and on the conversion of foreign currency intoreais. The currently applicable rate for most types of foreign exchange transactions is 0.38%. However, other rates apply to specific types of transactions.

Any inflow of funds related to investments carried out on the Brazilian financial and capital markets by a 4,373 Holders is currently subject to the IOF/Exchange Tax at a rate of zero percent. Foreign exchange transactions related to outflows of funds in connection with investments carried out on the Brazilian financial and capital markets are subject to the IOF/Exchange Tax at a rate of zero percent.

The IOF/Exchange Tax also levies at a zero percent rate in case of dividends and interest on shareholders’ equity paid by a Brazilian corporation toNon-Brazilian Holders.

The Brazilian government is permitted to increase the rate of the IOF/Exchange Tax at any time by up to 25% on the foreign exchange transaction amount. However, any increase in rates will only apply to transactions carried out after such increase in rates enters into force.

The purchase of ADSs by aNon-Brazilian Holder outside Brazil generally does not require the execution of a foreign exchange agreement with the Brazilian Central Bank. If this is the case, the IOF/Exchange Tax is not due. The IOF/Exchange Tax is levied at a zero percent rate in connection with foreign exchange agreements, without any actual flows of funds, thatwhich are required for a cancellation of ADSs and exchange for shares traded on a Brazilian stock exchange.

Tax on Transactions Involving Securities (IOF/ Securities Tax)

Brazilian law imposes a Tax on Transactions Involving Bonds and Securities, or IOF/Bonds and Securities, due on transactions involving bonds and securities, including those carried out on a Brazilian stock exchange.exchange, futures and commodities exchanges.

The rate of IOF/Bonds and Securities applicable to most transactions involving shares and ADSs is currently zero, although the Brazilian government may increase such rate at any time up to 1.5% of the transaction amount per day, but only in respect of future transactions.

The transfer (cessão) of shares traded on a Brazilian stock exchange for the issuance of depositary receipts to be traded outside Brazil, such as ADSs, is currently subject to the IOF/Bonds and Securities at a zero percent rate.

New Tax Regime Created by Law No. 12,973

Normative Ruling No. 1,397/2013, published in the Official Gazette on September 17, 2013, was enacted to regulate the transitional tax regime, or RTT, in force between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2014, to adjust, for tax purposes, the net profit calculated under the IFRS rules in accordance with Law 11,638/2007. According to Normative Ruling No. 1,397/2013, for purposes of calculating dividends and interest on net equity, taxpayers must use the accounting books prepared according to the criteria in force on December 31, 2007, and not IFRS. According to such provisions, depending on the tax basis used by the taxpayer, certain dividend distributions may be subject to a 15% withholding tax (or 25% if the taxpayer resides in a “tax haven” jurisdiction).

Provisional Measure 627/2013 was converted into Law No. 12,973, enacted on May 13, 2014 (“Law 12,973/14”), which revoked the RTT and introduced a new tax regime, in line with the current Brazilian accounting standards (IFRS). According to Law 12,973/14, companies electing to be taxed under the new regime on January 1, 2014 as opposed to January 1, 2015 will not be subject to taxation under Normative Ruling No. 1,397/2013 on their dividend distributions based on 2014 profits. Companies that did not elect to be taxed under the new regime on January 1, 2014, might be subject to withholding income tax on a part of the dividend distributions based on 2014 profits, according to the rules set forth under Normative Ruling No. 1,397/2013.

Other Brazilian Taxes

There are no Brazilian inheritance, gift or succession taxes applicable to the ownership, transfer or disposition of Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs by aNon-Brazilian Holder except for gift and inheritance taxes levied by some states in Brazil in the transfer of Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs to residents of those states. There are no Brazilian stamp, issue, registration, or similar taxes or duties payable byNon-Brazilian Holders of Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs.

U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations

The following is a discussion of the material U.S. federal income tax consequences that may be relevant with respect to the acquisition, ownership and disposition of Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs, which are evidenced by American Depositary Receipts, or ADRs. This description addresses only the U.S. federal income tax considerations of U.S. Holders (as defined below) that are initial purchasers of Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs and that will hold such shares or ADSs as capital assets. This description does not address tax considerations applicable to holders that may be subject to special tax rules, such as banks, financial institutions, insurance companies, real estate investment trusts, grantor trusts, regulated investment companies, dealers or traders in securities or currencies,tax-exempt entities, pension funds, persons that received Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs pursuant to an exercise of employee stock options or rights or otherwise as compensation for the performance of services, persons that will hold Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs as a position in a “straddle” or as a part of a “hedging,” “conversion” or other risk reduction transaction for U.S. federal income tax purposes, persons that have a “functional currency” other than the U.S. dollar, persons that will own Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs through partnerships or other pass through entities, holders subject to the alternative minimum tax, certain former citizens or long-term residents of the United States or holders that own (or are deemed to own) 10% or more (by combined voting power or combined value) of Oi’s shares.

This description does not address any state, local ornon-U.S. tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs by U.S. Holders. Moreover, this description does not address the consequences of any U.S. federal tax other than income tax, including but not limited to the U.S. federal estate and gift taxes. This description is based on (1) the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), existing and temporary U.S. Treasury Regulations and judicial and administrative interpretations thereof, in each case as in effect and available on the date of this annual report, as well as proposed Treasury Regulations available on the date of this annual report, and (2) in part, the representations of the depositary and the assumption that each obligation in the deposit agreement and any related agreement will be performed in accordance with its terms. All of the foregoing is subject to change, which change could apply retroactively and could affect the tax consequences described below. Holders should consult their tax advisers to determine the particular tax consequences to such holders of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs, including the applicability and effect of U.S. state, local andnon-U.S. tax laws.

As used herein, the term “U.S. Holder” means, for U.S. federal tax purposes, a beneficial owner of Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs that is:

 

an individual citizen or resident of the United States;

 

a corporation organized under the laws of the United States, any state thereof or the District of Columbia;

 

an estate the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source; or

 

a trust if (1) a court within the United States is able to exercise primary supervision over its administration, and (2) one or more United States persons have the authority to control all of the substantial decisions of such trust.

If a partnership (or any other entity treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) holds Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs, the tax treatment of a partner in such partnership will generally depend on the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. A partnership or its partners should consult their tax advisor as to its tax consequences.

Treatment of ADSs

In general, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, a holder of an ADR evidencing an ADS will be treated as the beneficial owner of Common Shares or Preferred Shares represented by the applicable ADS. The U.S. Treasury Department has expressed concern that depositaries for ADSs, or other intermediaries between the holders of shares of an issuer and the issuer, may be taking actions that are inconsistent with the claiming of U.S. foreign tax credits by U.S. Holders of such receipts or shares. Such actions include, for example, apre-release of an ADS by a depositary. Accordingly, the analysis regarding the availability of a U.S. foreign tax credit for Brazilian taxes, the sourcing rules described below and the availability of the reduced tax rate for dividends received by certainnon-corporate holders, each could be affected by future actions that may be taken by the U.S. Treasury Department.

Taxation of Dividends

Subject to the discussion below under “—Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules,” in general, the gross amount of a distribution made with respect to a common share, preferred share or ADS of Oi (which for this purpose shall include distributions of interest attributable to shareholders’ equity before any reduction for any Brazilian taxes withheld therefrom) will, to the extent made from the current or accumulated earnings and profits of Oi, as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles, constitute a dividend to a U.S. Holder for U.S. federal income tax purposes.Non-corporate U.S. Holders may be taxed on dividends from a qualified foreign corporation at the lower rates applicable to long-term capital gains (i.e., gains with respect to capital assets held for more than one year). A foreign corporation is treated as a qualified foreign corporation with respect to dividends received from that corporation on shares or ADSs that are readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States. U.S. Treasury Department guidance indicates that the ADSs of Oi (which are listed on the NYSE), but not the common or preferred shares of Oi, are readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States. Thus, subject to the discussion below under “—Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules,” as of the date of this annual report, dividends that Oi pays on the ADS, but not on the Common Shares or Preferred Shares of Oi, meet the trading conditions discussed above required for these reduced tax rates. However, there can be no assurance that the ADSs will be considered readily tradable on an established securities market in later years. Furthermore, a U.S. Holder’s eligibility for such preferential rate is subject to certain holding period requirements and thenon-existence of certain risk reduction transactions with respect to the ADSs and such preferential rate is not available if Oi is a PFIC for the taxable year in which such dividend is paid or was a PFIC for the taxable year preceding the taxable year in which such dividend is paid. Such dividends will not be eligible for the dividends received deduction generally allowed to corporate U.S. Holders. Subject to the discussion below under “—Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules,” if a distribution exceeds the amount of the current and accumulated earnings and profits of Oi, it will be treated as anon-taxable return of capital to the extent of the U.S. Holder’s tax basis in the common share, preferred share or ADS of Oi on which it is paid and thereafter as capital gain. Oi does not maintain calculations of the earnings and profits of Oi under U.S. federal income tax principles. Therefore, U.S. Holders should expect that distributions by Oi generally will be treated as dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Additionally, because Oi believes that it was a PFIC for the taxable year ended December 31, 2018, distributions, if any, paid during the 2019 taxable year are not be eligible for the preferential tax rates discussed above.

A dividend paid inreais will be includible in the income of a U.S. Holder at its value in U.S. dollars calculated by reference to the prevailing spot market exchange rate in effect on the day it is received by the U.S. Holder in the case of Common Shares or Preferred Shares or, in the case of a dividend received in respect of ADSs of Oi, on the date the dividend is received by the depositary, whether or not the dividend is converted into U.S. dollars. Assuming the payment is not converted at that time, the U.S. Holder will have a tax basis in reais equal to that U.S. dollar amount, which will be used to measure gain or loss from subsequent changes in exchange rates. Any gain or loss realized by a U.S. Holder that subsequently sells or otherwise disposes of reais, which gain or loss is attributable to currency fluctuations after the date of receipt of the dividend, will be ordinary gain or loss. The amount of any distribution of property other than cash will be the fair market value of such property on the date of distribution.

The gross amount of any dividend paid (which will include any amounts withheld in respect of Brazilian taxes) with respect to a common share, preferred share or ADS of Oi will be subject to U.S. federal income taxation as foreign source dividend income, which may be relevant in calculating a U.S. Holder’s foreign tax credit limitation. Subject to limitations under U.S. federal income tax law concerning credits or deductions for foreign taxes and certain exceptions for short-term and hedged positions, any Brazilian withholding tax will be treated as a foreign income tax eligible for credit against a U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability (or at a U.S. Holder’s election, may be deducted in computing taxable income if the U.S. Holder has elected to deduct all foreign income taxes for the taxable year). The limitation on foreign taxes eligible for the U.S. foreign tax credit is calculated separately with respect to specific “baskets” of income. For this purpose, the dividends should generally constitute “passive category income,” or in the case of certain U.S. Holders, “general category income.” The rules with respect to foreign tax credits are complex, and U.S. Holders are urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding the availability of the foreign tax credit under their particular circumstances.

Treatment of Preferred Stock

Section 305 of the Code provides special rules for the tax treatment of preferred stock. According to the U.S. Treasury Regulations under that section, the term preferred stock generally refers to stock which enjoys certain limited rights and privileges (generally associated with specified dividend and liquidation priorities) but does not participate in corporate growth to any significant extent. While Oi’s Preferred Shares have some preferences over its Common Shares, the Preferred Shares are not fixed as to dividend payments or liquidation value. Consequently, although the matter is not entirely clear, because the determination is highly factual in nature, it is more likely than not that the preferred shares of Oi will be treated as “common stock” within the meaning of section 305 of the Code. If the preferred shares are treated as “common stock” for purposes of section 305 of the Code, distributions to U.S. Holders of additional shares of such “common stock” or preemptive rights relating to such “common stock” with respect to their preferred shares or ADSs that are made as part of a pro rata distribution to all shareholders in most instances will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax. On the other hand, if the preferred shares are treated as “preferred stock” within the meaning of section 305 of the Code, and if a U.S. Holder receives a distribution of additional shares or preemptive rights as described in the preceding sentence, such distributions (including amounts withheld in respect of any Brazilian taxes), as discussed more fully below, will be treated as dividends to the same extent and in the same manner as distributions payable in cash. In that event, the amount of such distribution (and the basis of the new shares or preemptive rights so received) will equal the fair market value of the shares or preemptive rights on the date of distribution.

Sale, Exchange or Other Disposition of the Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs of Oi

A deposit or withdrawal of common shares or preferred shares by a U.S. Holder in exchange for the ADS that represent such shares will not result in the realization of gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Subject to the discussion below under “—Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules,” a U.S. Holder generally will recognize capital gain or loss upon a sale, exchange or other disposition of a common share, preferred share or ADS of Oi held by the U.S. Holder or the depositary, as the case may be, in an amount equal to the difference between the U.S. Holder’s adjusted basis in its common shares, preferred shares or ADSs of Oi (determined in U.S. dollars) and the U.S. dollar amount realized on the sale, exchange or other disposition. If a Brazilian tax is withheld on the sale, exchange or other disposition of a share, the amount realized by a U.S. Holder will include the gross amount of the proceeds of that sale, exchange or other disposition before deduction of the Brazilian tax. In the case of anon-corporate U.S. Holder, the maximum marginal U.S. federal income tax rate applicable to capital gain generally will be lower than the maximum marginal U.S. federal income tax rate applicable to ordinary income (other than, as discussed above, certain dividends) if such holder’s holding period for such common share, preferred share or ADS of Oi exceeds one year (i.e., such gain is a long-term capital gain). Capital gain, if any, realized by a U.S. Holder on the sale or exchange of a common share, preferred share or ADS of Oi generally will be treated as U.S. source income for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes. Consequently, in the case of a disposition or deposit of a common share, preferred share or ADS of Oi that is subject to Brazilian tax, the U.S. Holder may not be able to use the foreign tax credit for that Brazilian tax unless it can apply the credit against U.S. tax payable on other income from foreign sources in the appropriate income category, or, alternatively, it may take a deduction for the Brazilian tax if it elects to deduct all of its foreign income taxes. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations under the Code.

The initial tax basis of a U.S. Holder’s common shares, preferred shares or ADSs of Oi will be the U.S. dollar value of the reais-denominated purchase price determined on the date of purchase. If the common shares, preferred shares or ADSs of Oi are treated as traded on an “established securities market,” a cash basis U.S. Holder, or, if it elects, an accrual basis U.S. Holder, will determine the dollar value of the cost of such common shares, preferred shares or ADSs by translating the amount paid at the spot rate of exchange on the settlement date of the purchase. The conversion of U.S. dollars to reais and the immediate use of that currency to purchase common shares, preferred shares or ADSs generally will not result in taxable gain or loss for a U.S. Holder.

With respect to the sale or exchange of Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs, the amount realized generally will be the U.S. dollar value of the payment received determined on the date of disposition. If Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs are treated as traded on an “established securities market,” a cash basis taxpayer, or, if it elects, an accrual basis taxpayer, will determine the U.S. dollar value of the amount realized by translating the amount received at the spot rate of exchange on the settlement date of the sale.

Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules

ANon-U.S.non-U.S. corporation will be classified as a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes in any taxable year in which, after applying certain look-through rules, either (1) at least 75 percent of its gross income is “passive income,” or (2) at least 50 percent of the average value of its gross assets is attributable to assets that produce “passive income” or is held for the production of passive income. Passive income for this purpose generally includes dividends, interest, royalties, rents and gains from commodities and securities transactions. For purposes of the PFIC asset test, the aggregate fair market value of the assets of a publicly traded foreign corporation generally is treated as being equal to the sum of the aggregate value of the outstanding stock and the total amount of the liabilities of such corporation (the “Market Capitalization”).

Based on certain estimates of the gross income and gross assets of Oi, the nature of its business, the size of its investment in certain subsidiaries, and its anticipated Market Capitalization, Oi believes that it was not classified as a PFIC for its taxable year ended December 31, 2018. In addition,2019, although Oi believes therethat it was a PFIC for the taxable year ended December 31, 2018. Nevertheless, because PFIC status is a riskdetermined annually based on Oi’s income, assets and activities for the entire taxable year, it is not possible to determine whether Oi will be characterized as a PFIC for the taxable year ending December 31, 2019 and2020, or for future taxable years, unless the market price of the Common Shares or Preferred Shares significantly increases or Oi reduces the amount of cash and other passive assets it holds relative to the amount of non-passive assets it holds. The application of the PFIC rules is subject to uncertainty in several respects, and Oi must make a separate determinationany subsequent year, until after the close of each taxable year as to whether it wasthe year. Furthermore, because Oi determines the value of its gross assets based on the Market Capitalization test, a decline in the value of its Common Shares and Preferred Shares may result in Oi becoming a PFIC. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that Oi will not be considered a PFIC for suchany taxable year. Moreover, Oi has not obtained an opinion from counsel regarding the PFIC status of Oi for any taxable period.

If Oi is a PFIC for any taxable year during which a U.S. Holder holds Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs, Oi generally will continue to be treated as a PFIC with respect to such U.S. Holder for all succeeding years during which such U.S. Holder holds Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs, unless Oi ceases to be a PFIC and such U.S. Holder makes a “deemed sale” election with respect to such Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs. If such election is made, such U.S. Holder will be deemed to have sold such Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs held by such U.S. Holder at their fair market value on the last day of the last taxable year in which Oi qualified as a PFIC, and any gain from such deemed sale would be subject to the consequences described in the following paragraph. After the deemed sale election, such U.S. Holder’s Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs with respect to which the deemed sale election was made will not be treated as shares in a PFIC, and such U.S. Holder would not be subject to the rules described below with respect to any “excess distribution” such U.S. Holder receives from Oi or any gain from an actual sale or other disposition of such Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs, unless Oi subsequently becomes a PFIC.The rules dealing with deemed sale elections are complex. U.S. Holders are encouraged to consult their tax advisor as to the possibility and consequences of making a deemed sale election if Oi ceases to be treated as a PFIC and such election becomes available to U.S. Holders.election.

For each taxable year that Oi is treated as a PFIC with respect to a U.S. Holder, any excess distribution (generally a distribution in excess of 125% of the average distribution over a three-year period or shorter holding period for Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs) and realized gain will be treated as ordinary income and will be subject to tax as if (1) the excess distribution or gain had been realized ratably over the U.S. Holder’s holding period, (2) the amount deemed realized in each year had been subject to tax in each such year at the highest marginal rate for such year (other than income allocated to the current period or any taxable period before Oi became a PFIC, which would be subject to tax at the U.S. Holder’s regular ordinary income rate for the current year and would not be subject to the interest charge discussed below), and (3) the interest charge generally applicable to underpayments of tax had been imposed on the taxes deemed to have been payable in those years. U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the tax consequences of Oi being treated as a PFIC with respect to such U.S. Holders. The tax liability for amounts allocated to taxable years prior to the year of disposition or excess distribution cannot be offset by any net operating losses for such years, and gains (but not losses) realized on the sale or other disposition of Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs cannot be treated as capital, even if a U.S. Holder holds Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs as capital assets. In addition, a U.S. Holder’s tax basis in Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs that are acquired from a decedent would not receive astep-up to fair market value as of the date of the decedent’s death but instead would be equal to the decedent’s basis, if lower.

If Oi is treated as a PFIC with respect to a U.S. Holder for any taxable year, to the extent any of Oi’s subsidiaries are also PFICs or Oi makes direct or indirect equity investments in other entities that are PFICs, such U.S. Holder may be deemed to own shares in such lower-tier PFICs that are directly or indirectly owned by Oi in that proportion which the value of the common shares, preferred shares or ADSs of Oi such U.S. Holder owns bears to the value of all of Common Shares, Preferred Shares and ADSs, and such U.S. Holder may be subject to the adverse tax consequences described in the preceding two paragraphs with respect to the shares of such lower-tier PFICs that such U.S. Holder would be deemed to own. U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisor regarding the application of the PFIC rules to any of Oi’s subsidiaries.

If Oi is treated as a PFIC with respect to a U.S. Holder of the common shares, preferred shares or ADSs of Oi, such U.S. Holder may be able to make certain elections that may alleviate certain of the tax consequences referred to above. Where a company that is a PFIC meets certain reporting requirements, a U.S. Holder can avoid certain adverse PFIC consequences described above by making a “qualified electing fund,” or QEF, election to be taxed currently on its proportionate share of the PFIC’s ordinary income and net capital gains. However, Oi does not intend to comply with the necessary accounting and record keeping requirements that would allow a U.S. Holder to make a QEF election with respect to Oi.

If Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs are “regularly traded” on a “qualified exchange,” a U.S. Holder may make amark-to-market election with respect to the common shares, preferred shares or ADSs of Oi, as the case may be. If a U.S. Holder makes themark-to-market election, for each year in which Oi is a PFIC, the holder will generally include as ordinary income the excess, if any, of the fair market value of Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs, as the case may be, at the end of the taxable year over their adjusted tax basis, and will be permitted an ordinary loss in respect of the excess, if any, of the adjusted tax basis of Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs, over their fair market value at the end of the taxable year (but only to the extent of the net amount of previously included income as a result of themark-to-market election). If a U.S. Holder makes the election, the holder’s tax basis in Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs, as the case may be, will be adjusted to reflect the amount of any such income or loss. Any gain recognized on the sale or other disposition of Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs will be treated as ordinary income. Common Shares, Preferred Shares and ADSs will be considered “marketable stock” if they are traded on a qualified exchange, other than in de minimis quantities, on at least 15 days during each calendar quarter. The NYSE is a qualified exchange and the B3 may constitute a qualified exchange for this purpose provided the B3 meets certain trading volume, listing, financial disclosure, surveillance and other requirements set forth in applicable U.S. Treasury Regulations. However, Oi cannot be certain that its common shares, preferred sharesCommon Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs will continue to trade on the B3 or the NYSE, respectively, or that its common shares, preferred sharesCommon Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs will be traded on at least 15 days in each calendar quarter in other than de minimis quantities. U.S. Holders should be aware, however, that for each taxable year that Oi is treated as a PFIC with respect to a U.S. Holder, the interest charge regime described above could be applied to indirect distributions or gains deemed to be attributable to such U.S. Holder in respect of any of Oi’s subsidiaries that also may be determined to be a PFIC, and themark-to-market election generally would not be effective for such subsidiaries. Each U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor to determine whether amark-to-market election is available and the consequences of making an election if Oi were characterized as a PFIC.

If a U.S. Holder owns common shares, preferred shares or ADSs of Oi during any year in which Oi was a PFIC, such U.S. Holder generally must file IRS Form 8621 with respect to Oi, generally with the U.S. Holder’s federal income tax return for that year.

Taxation of Dividends

Subject to the discussion above under “—Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules,” in general, the gross amount of a distribution made with respect to a common share, preferred share or ADS of Oi (which for this purpose shall include distributions of interest attributable to shareholders’ equity before any reduction for any Brazilian taxes withheld therefrom) will, to the extent made from the current or accumulated earnings and profits of Oi, as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles, constitute a dividend to a U.S. Holder for U.S. federal income tax purposes.Non-corporate U.S. Holders may be taxed on dividends from a qualified foreign corporation at the lower rates applicable to long-term capital gains (i.e., gains with respect to capital assets held for more than one year). A foreign corporation is treated as a qualified foreign corporation with respect to dividends received from that corporation on shares or ADSs that are readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States. U.S. Treasury Department guidance indicates that the ADSs of Oi (which are listed on the NYSE), but not the common or preferred shares of Oi, are readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States. Thus, subject to the discussion above under “—Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules,” as of the date of this annual report, dividends that Oi pays on the ADS, but not on the common sharesCommon Shares or preferred sharesPreferred Shares of Oi, currently meet the trading conditions discussed above required for these reduced tax rates. However, there can be no assurance that the ADSs will be considered readily tradable on an established securities market in later years. Furthermore, a U.S. Holder’s eligibility for such preferential rate is subject to certain holding period requirements and thenon-existence of certain risk reduction transactions with respect to the ADSs and such preferential rate is not available if Oi is a PFIC for the taxable year in which such dividend is paid or was a PFIC for the taxable year preceding the taxable year in which such dividend is paid. Such dividends will not be eligible for the dividends received deduction generally allowed to corporate U.S. Holders. Subject to the discussion above under “—Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules,” if a distribution exceeds the amount of the current and accumulated earnings and profits of Oi, it will be treated as anon-taxable return of capital to the extent of the U.S. Holder’s tax basis in the common share, preferred share or ADS of Oi on which it is paid and thereafter as capital gain. Oi does not maintain calculations of the earnings and profits of Oi under U.S. federal income tax principles. Therefore, U.S. Holders should expect that distributions by Oi generally will be treated as dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

A dividend paid inreais will be includible in the income of a U.S. Holder at its value in U.S. dollars calculated by reference to the prevailing spot market exchange rate in effect on the day it is received by the U.S. Holder in the case of Common Shares or Preferred Shares or, in the case of a dividend received in respect of ADSs of Oi, on the date the dividend is received by the depositary, whether or not the dividend is converted into U.S. dollars. Assuming the payment is not converted at that time, the U.S. Holder will have a tax basis in reais equal to that U.S. dollar amount, which will be used to measure gain or loss from subsequent changes in exchange rates. Any gain or loss realized by a U.S. Holder that subsequently sells or otherwise disposes of reais, which gain or loss is attributable to currency fluctuations after the date of receipt of the dividend, will be ordinary gain or loss. The amount of any distribution of property other than cash will be the fair market value of such property on the date of distribution.

The gross amount of any dividend paid (which will include any amounts withheld in respect of Brazilian taxes) with respect to a common share, preferred share or ADS of Oi will be subject to U.S. federal income taxation as foreign source dividend income, which may be relevant in calculating a U.S. Holder’s foreign tax credit limitation. Subject to limitations under U.S. federal income tax law concerning credits or deductions for foreign taxes and certain exceptions for short-term and hedged positions, any Brazilian withholding tax will be treated as a foreign income tax eligible for credit against a U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability (or at a U.S. Holder’s election, may be deducted in computing taxable income if the U.S. Holder has elected to deduct all foreign income taxes for the taxable year). The limitation on foreign taxes eligible for the U.S. foreign tax credit is calculated separately with respect to specific “baskets” of income. For this purpose, the dividends should generally constitute “passive category income,” or in the case of certain U.S. Holders, “general category income.” The rules with respect to foreign tax credits are complex, and U.S. Holders are urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding the availability of the foreign tax credit under their particular circumstances.

Treatment of Preferred Stock

Section 305 of the Code provides special rules for the tax treatment of preferred stock. According to the U.S. Treasury Regulations under that section, the term preferred stock generally refers to stock which enjoys certain limited rights and privileges (generally associated with specified dividend and liquidation priorities) but does not participate in corporate growth to any significant extent. While Oi’s preferred sharesPreferred Shares have some preferences over its common shares,Common Shares, the preferred sharesPreferred Shares are not fixed as to dividend payments or liquidation value. Consequently, although the matter is not entirely clear, because the determination is highly factual in nature, it is more likely than not that the preferred sharesPreferred Shares of Oi will be treated as “common stock” within the meaning of section 305 of the Code. If the preferred sharesPreferred Shares are treated as “common stock” for purposes of section 305 of the Code, distributions to U.S. Holders of additional shares of such “common stock” or preemptive rights relating to such “common stock” with respect to their preferred shares or ADSs that are made as part of a pro rata distribution to all shareholders in most instances will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax. On the other hand, if the preferred sharesPreferred Shares are treated as “preferred stock” within the meaning of section 305 of the Code, and if a U.S. Holder receives a distribution of additional shares or preemptive rights as described in the preceding sentence, such distributions (including amounts withheld in respect of any Brazilian taxes), as discussed more fully below, will be treated as dividends to the same extent and in the same manner as distributions payable in cash. In that event, the amount of such distribution (and the basis of the new shares or preemptive rights so received) will equal the fair market value of the shares or preemptive rights on the date of distribution.

Sale, Exchange or Other Disposition of the Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs of Oi

A deposit or withdrawal of common shares or preferred shares by a U.S. Holder in exchange for the ADS that represent such shares will not result in the realization of gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Subject to the discussion above under “—Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules,” a U.S. Holder generally will recognize capital gain or loss upon a sale, exchange or other disposition of a common share, preferred share or ADS of Oi held by the U.S. Holder or the depositary, as the case may be, in an amount equal to the difference between the U.S. Holder’s adjusted basis in its common shares, preferred shares or ADSs of Oi (determined in U.S. dollars) and the U.S. dollar amount realized on the sale, exchange or other disposition. If a Brazilian tax is withheld on the sale, exchange or other disposition of a share, the amount realized by a U.S. Holder will include the gross amount of the proceeds of that sale, exchange or other disposition before deduction of the Brazilian tax. In the case of anon-corporate U.S. Holder, the maximum marginal U.S. federal income tax rate applicable to capital gain generally will be lower than the maximum marginal U.S. federal income tax rate applicable to ordinary income (other than, as discussed above, certain dividends) if such holder’s holding period for such common share, preferred share or ADS of Oi exceeds one year (i.e., such gain is a long-term capital gain). Capital gain, if any, realized by a U.S. Holder on the sale or exchange of a common share, preferred share or ADS of Oi generally will be treated as U.S. source income for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes. Consequently, in the case of a disposition or deposit of a common share, preferred share or ADS of Oi that is subject to Brazilian tax, the U.S. Holder may not be able to use the foreign tax credit for that Brazilian tax unless it can apply the credit against U.S. tax payable on other income from foreign sources in the appropriate income category, or, alternatively, it may take a deduction for the Brazilian tax if it elects to deduct all of its foreign income taxes. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations under the Code.

The initial tax basis of a U.S. Holder’s common shares, preferred shares or ADSs of Oi will be the U.S. dollar value of the reais-denominated purchase price determined on the date of purchase. If the common shares, preferred shares or ADSs of Oi are treated as traded on an “established securities market,” a cash basis U.S. Holder, or, if it elects, an accrual basis U.S. Holder, will determine the dollar value of the cost of such common shares, preferred shares or ADSs by translating the amount paid at the spot rate of exchange on the settlement date of the purchase. The conversion of U.S. dollars to reais and the immediate use of that currency to purchase common shares, preferred shares or ADSs generally will not result in taxable gain or loss for a U.S. Holder.

With respect to the sale or exchange of Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs, the amount realized generally will be the U.S. dollar value of the payment received determined on the date of disposition. If Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs are treated as traded on an “established securities market,” a cash basis taxpayer, or, if it elects, an accrual basis taxpayer, will determine the U.S. dollar value of the amount realized by translating the amount received at the spot rate of exchange on the settlement date of the sale.

Other Brazilian Taxes

Any Brazilian IOF/Exchange Tax or IOF/Bonds and Securities Tax (as discussed under “—Brazilian Tax Considerations” above) may not be treated as a creditable foreign tax for U.S. federal income tax purposes, although a U.S. Holder may be entitled to deduct such taxes if it elects to deduct all of its foreign income taxes. U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of these taxes.

3.8% Medicare Tax On “Net Investment Income”

Certain U.S. Holders who are individuals, estates or trusts may be required to pay an additional 3.8% tax on, among other things, dividends and capital gains from the sale or other disposition of Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs.

Information Reporting and Backup Withholding

In general, information reporting will apply to dividends in respect of Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs and the proceeds from the sale, exchange or redemption of Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs that are paid to a U.S. Holder within the United States (and in certain cases, outside the United States) by a U.S. payor or U.S. middleman, unless such U.S. Holder is an exempt recipient such as a corporation. A backup withholding tax may apply to such payments if a U.S. Holder fails to provide a taxpayer identification number or certification of other exempt status or fail to report in full dividend and interest income.

Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules will be allowed as a refund or a credit against a U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability provided the required information is furnished to the Internal Revenue Service in a timely manner.

Certain U.S. Holders who are individuals are required to report information relating to an interest in Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs, subject to certain exceptions (including an exception for Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs held in accounts maintained by U.S. financial institutions). U.S. Holders are urged to consult their tax advisors regarding their information reporting obligations, if any, with respect to their acquisition, ownership and disposition of Common Shares, Preferred Shares or ADSs.

Documents on Display

Statements contained in this annual report regarding the contents of any contract or other document filed as an exhibit to this annual report summarize their material terms, but are not necessarily complete, and each of these statements is qualified in all respects by reference to the full text of such contract or other document.

We are subject to the information requirements of the Exchange Act, except that as a foreign issuer, we are not subject to the proxy rules or the short-swing profit disclosure rules of the Exchange Act. In accordance with these statutory requirements, we file with or furnish reports and other information to the SEC. Reports and other information filed or furnished by us to the SEC may be inspected and copied at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC at Room 1024, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Copies of such material may also be inspected at the offices of the NYSE, 11 Wall Street, New York, New York 10005, on which our ADRs are listed. In addition, the SEC maintains a website that contains information which we have filed electronically with the SEC, which can be accessed over the Internet athttp://www.sec.gov.

We also file financial statements and other periodic reports with the CVM, which are available for investor inspection at the CVM’s offices located at Rua Sete de Setembro, 111, 2nd floor, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, and Rua Cincinato Braga, 340, 2nd, 3rd and 4th floors, São Paulo, SP. The telephone numbersCVM maintains an Internet website that contains reports and other information about issuers, like us, that file electronically with the CVM. The address of that website is http://www.cvm.gov.br. We also file consolidated financial statements and other periodic information with B3. The address of the CVM in Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo are+55-21-3554-8686 and+55-11-2146-2000, respectively.B3 website is http://www.bmfbovespa.com.br.

Copies of Oi’s annual report on Form20-F and documents referred to in this annual report and Oi’sby-laws are available for inspection upon request at Oi’s headquarters at Rua do Lavradio, 71, 2 andar – Centro, CEP20.230-070 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. Oi’s filings are also available to the public through the internet at Oi’s website at www.oi.com.br/ir. The information included on Oi’s website or that might be accessed through Oi’s website is not included in this annual report and is not incorporated into this annual report by reference.

ITEM 11.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are exposed to market risks related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. We are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risk mainly because (1) a significant portion of our equipment costs, such as costs relating to switching centers and software used for upgrading network capacity, are primarily denominated in foreign currencies or linked to foreign currencies, primarily the U.S. dollar, other than those in which we earn revenues (primarilyreais), and (2) a significant portion of our loansborrowings and financingsfinancing are denominated in foreign currencies, primarily the U.S. dollar. We are subject to market risk deriving from changes in interest rates because a significant portion of our indebtedness bears interest at floating rates. We have historically entered into derivative transactions to manage certain market risks, mainly our foreign currency exchange rate risk and our interest rate risk. However, in connection with our RJ Proceedings, we reversed our derivative financial instruments during the second and third quarters of 2016. As of December 31, 2018, we were not a party to any derivative financial instruments. In 2016 prior to the commencement of the RJ Proceedings, we developed and approved with Oi’s board of directors a new hedging policy that modified the risk management objectives from earnings to cash flow at risk. With the conclusion of our RJ Proceedings, and, hence, the accurate measurement of our risk factors, we have recently approved the hedging strategy for 20192020 in line with our hedging policy, focused on cash flows, and liquidity, while complying with the financial covenants contained in our debt instruments. As of December 31, 2019, we had derivative instruments designed to hedge our short term U.S. dollar-linked debt interest payments, as well as part of our operating expenses contractually denominated in U.S. dollars.

Exchange Rate Risk

During 2018,2019, approximately 19%28.8% of our capital expenditures were U.S. dollar-denominated or linked to the U.S. dollar. A hypothetical, instantaneous 10.0% depreciation of the real against the U.S. dollar as of December 31, 20182019 would have resulted in an increase of R$113714 million in the cost of our capital expenditures during 2018,2019, assuming that we would have incurred all of these capital expenditures notwithstanding the adverse change in the exchange rates.

Our financing cost and the amount of financial liabilities that we record are also exposed to exchange rate risk. As of December 31, 2018,2019, R$8,8179,521 million, or 53.6%52.2%, of our total consolidated loansborrowings and financings was denominated in foreign currency, after giving effect to the fair value adjustment to our loansborrowings and financings.financing and debt issuance costs. We have recorded foreign currency and monetary restatement losses of R$2,646640 million during 20182019 with respect to our foreign currency-denominated financial liabilities and foreign currency and monetary restatement gains of R$1,399334 million during 20182019 with respect to the fair value adjustment related to our foreign currency denominated debt, based on exchange rates in effect at the end of 2018.2019. The potential additional losses on foreign currency and monetary restatement during 20182019 that would result from a hypothetical, instantaneous 10.0% depreciation of thereal against the U.S. dollar and the euro as of December 31, 20182019 would be approximately R$860914 million, assuming that the amount and composition of our debt instruments were unchanged. The potential increase in our total consolidated debt obligations that would result from a 10.0% depreciation of therealagainst the U.S. dollar and the euro as of December 31, 20182019 would be approximately R$883953 million.

Interest Rate Risk

As of December 31, 2018,2019, we had total outstanding loansborrowings and financings of R$30,37931,642 million, excluding the fair value adjustment to our loans and financings,debt issuance costs, and R$16,45018,227 million, after giving effect to the fair value adjustment.adjustment and debt issuance costs. Of this outstanding balance after giving effect to the fair value adjustment and debt issuance costs, R$7,5668,641 million, or 46.0%47.8%, wasreal-denominated indebtedness that bore interest at floating rates primarily based on the CDI rate or TJLP rate, R$5442 million wasreal-denominated indebtedness that bore interest at fixed rates and R$1423 million wasreal-denominated indebtedness that bore interest based at TR (currently at zero).

We invest our excess liquidity (R$4,6242,299 million as of December 31, 2018)2019) mainly in (1) in short-term instruments denominated inreais that generally pay interest at overnight interest rates based on the CDI rate which partially mitigates our exposure to Brazilian interest rate risk, (2) certificates of deposit and time deposits issued by global and domestic financial institutions with AAA and AA ratings from international rating agencies, and (3) in investment funds created by top Brazilian asset managers exclusively for us. The fund managers of the investment funds created for us are responsible for managing our funds, subject to the direction of our investment policy, approved by Oi’s board of directors. Currently,As of the date of this annual report, these funds are comprised mainly of government bonds and otherlow-risk financial instruments linked to the CDI and SelicSELIC rates.

We recorded interest on borrowings payable to third parties and debentures of R$1,4001,618 million during 2018, based on the applicable interest rates in effect at the end of 2018.2019. The potential additional interest on borrowings payable to third parties during 20182019 that would have resulted from a hypothetical, instantaneous and unfavorable change of 100 basis points in the interest rates on January 1, 2018December 31, 2019 would be approximately R$123131 million considering the impact inon our debt obligations. This sensitivity analysis is based on the assumption of an unfavorable 100 basis points movement of the interest rates applicable to each homogeneous category of financial liabilities and sustained over a period of one year. A homogeneous category is defined according to the currency in which financial assets and liabilities are denominated and assumes the same interest rate movement within each homogeneous category (e.g.,reais). As a result, our interest rate risk sensitivity model may overstate the impact of interest rate fluctuation for such financial instruments, as consistently unfavorable movements of all interest rates are unlikely.

Hedging Policy

We employ financial risk management strategies usingnon-deliverable forwards and dollar-denominated cash (natural hedge), and, in the future we may employ, cross-currency swaps, interest rate swaps and series swaps. Our financial risk management strategy is designed to protect us against devaluation of the real against foreign currencies, according to our foreign-currency exposure in connection with our financings. We do not enter into derivatives transactions for speculative reasons or any other purposes.

 

ITEM 12.

DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES

The depositary collects its fees for the delivery and surrender of ADSs directly from investors depositing shares or surrendering ADSs or from intermediaries acting for them. The depositary also collects fees for making distributions to investors by deducting those fees from the amounts distributed or by selling a portion of distributable property to pay the fees. The depositary may collect its annual fee for depositary services by deductions from cash distributions or by directly billing investors or by charging the book-entry system accounts of participants acting for them. The depositary may generally refuse to providefee-attracting services until its fees for those services are paid.

Persons depositing or withdrawing shares must pay:

 

US$5.00 (or less) per 100 ADSs (or portion of 100 ADSs) for the issuance of ADSs, including issuances resulting from a distribution of shares or rights or other property;

 

US$5.00 (or less) per 100 ADSs (or portion of 100 ADSs) for the cancellation of ADSs for the purpose of withdrawal, including in the event of the termination of the applicable deposit agreement relating to our ADSs;

 

US$0.02 (or less) per ADS (or portion thereof) for any cash distribution;

 

US$0.02 (or less) per ADS (or portion thereof) per calendar year for depositary services;

 

in the event of distributions of securities (other than Oi’s Class A preferred shares)Preferred Shares), a fee equivalent to the fee for the execution and delivery of ADRs referred to above, which would have been charged, as a result of the deposit of such securities (treating such securities as Class A Preferred Shares for the purposes of this fee);

 

registration or transfer fees for the transfer and registration of shares on Oi’s share register to or from the name of the depositary or its agent when you deposit or withdraw shares;

 

expenses of the depositary for (1) cable, telex and facsimile transmissions (when expressly provided in the applicable the deposit agreements relating to our ADSs), and (2) converting foreign currency to U.S. dollars;

 

taxes and other governmental charges the depositary or the custodian have to pay on any ADS or share underlying an ADS, for example, stock transfer taxes, stamp duty or withholding taxes, as necessary; and

 

any charges incurred by the depositary or its agents for servicing the deposited securities, as necessary.

Subject to certain terms and conditions, the depositary has agreed to reimburse Oi for certain expenses it incurs that are related to establishment and maintenance expenses of the ADS program, including the standardout-of-pocket maintenance costs for the ADRs, which consist of the expenses of postage and envelopes for mailing annual and interim financial reports, printing and distributing dividend checks, electronic filing of U.S. Federal tax information, mailing required tax forms, stationery, postage, facsimile, and telephone calls. There are limits on the amount of expenses for which the depositary will reimburse us, but the amount of reimbursement available to Oi is not necessarily tied to the amount of fees the depositary collects from investors.

During the year ended December 31, 2018,2019, we did not receive anyreceived US$10 million in reimbursements from the depositary of Oi’sour ADSs.

PART II

 

ITEM 13.

DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES

Not applicable.

 

ITEM 14.

MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Not applicable.

 

ITEM 15.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our chief executive officer, or CEO, and chief financial officer, or CFO, are responsible for establishing and maintaining our disclosure controls and procedures. These controls and procedures were designed to ensure that information that we are required to disclose in the reports that we file under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the applicable rules and forms of the SEC, and that it is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

We performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 20182019 under the supervision of our CEO and CFO.CFO (as defined in rules 13a-15(e) or 15(d)-15(e) under the Exchange Act). There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives.

Based on our evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2018,2019, and that the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to provide reasonable assurance that all material information relating to our company was reported as required because a material weakness in the current operation of our internal control over financial reporting was identified as described below.required.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal controls over financial reporting.reporting, as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f).

Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with applicable generally accepted accounting principles. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets, (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with applicable generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors, and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our CEO and CFO, our management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20182019 based on the criteria established in “Internal Control —Integrated Framework (2013)” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.Commission ("COSO"). Based on this assessment, our management concluded that as of December 31, 2018,2019, our internal control over financial reporting was not effective because a material weakness existed. A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combinationeffective.

Our independent registered public accounting firm, BDO RCS Auditores Independentes S.S., has issued an opinion on the effectiveness of control deficiencies, inour internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatementas of the annual consolidatedDecember 31, 2019 as stated in their report beginning on page F-3.

Remediation of Prior Material Weakness

During our management’s assessment of internal control over financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The material weakness identifiedreporting as of December 31, 2018, our management identified a material weakness. The material weakness was that although the Company has established effective controls with focus on the related parties’ transactions entered in 2018, the Companywe did not design, establish or maintain effective controls over the integrity and accuracy of prior years’ related parties’party transactions, which affectsaffected the current year balance sheet, including reconciliation, review and elimination of such transactions, in the consolidation process.

Our independent registered public accounting firm, BDO RCS Auditores Independentes S.S., has issued an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018 as stated in their report beginning on page F-3.

Remediation of Material Weakness

We haveDuring 2019, we implemented and continue to implement measures designed to remediate the material weakness and, in the short term, to mitigate the potential adverse effects of the material weakness.

We are committed to continuing to improve our internal control processes and will continue to diligently review our financial reporting controls and procedures in order to ensure our compliance with the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the related rules promulgated by the SEC.

Actions taken and planned to be taken by management to improve the internal control over financial reporting include the following:

During 2018, we have implementedreinforced controls to ensure correct and timely registration of related parties’party transactions and adequate review of such transactions as well the procedures and controls to ensure an adequate review of these transactions. By the end of 2019, we expect to complete the entire reconciliation of the balances from fiscal years prior to 2018 and their respective impactsproper impact on the elimination and consolidation process to ensure that it occurs in a correct and timely manner.

Remediation of Prior Material Weaknesses

Remediation of Material Weakness in Internal Control over Financial Reporting as of December 31, 2017

During our management’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, our management identified certain material weaknesses. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement in our annual or interim consolidated financial statements will not be prevented or detected on timely basis.

With the support of our management, we took significant measures to successfully remediate these material weaknesses reported in our annual report onForm 20-F for December 31, 2017, as described below.

Remediation activities related to manual journal entries

We have reinforced the access granting and profile management controls to mitigate the risk of improper access. In addition, we implemented an automated workflow to allow the appropriate identification, review and approval of manual journal entries.

Based upon the measures adopted, our management concluded that the actions implemented represented an improvement in the mitigation of risks in the control environment over this process and concluded that this deficiency was remediated as of December 31, 2018.

Remediation activities related to judicial deposits and contingencies

With the purpose of promoting the timely capture of the alterations to the status of the lawsuits and their relevant deposits, and also the effective impact on our records, we structured a set of actions mainly based on the following items:

Standardize procedures;

Implement automated controls, and improve the interfaces between all systems considered in this process;

Create an internal governance structure for periodic monitoring of inconsistencies arising from conciliation activities, with subsequent treatment of actions; and

Negotiate with banks to improve the accuracy of information.

Based upon the measures adopted, our management concluded that the actions implemented represented an improvement in the mitigation of risks in the control environment over this process and concluded that this deficiency was remediated as of December 31, 2018.

Remediation activities related to unbilled revenues provision

We implemented a process of periodic review of the estimates and parameters used to compose the unbilled revenues provision. In addition, we implemented a multidisciplinary management review process, to periodically perform the analysis and reconciliation of those accounts.

Based upon the measures adopted, our management concluded that the actions implemented represented an improvement in the mitigation of risks in the control environment over this process and concluded that this deficiency was remediated as of December 31, 2018.

Remediation activities related to the preparation and review of U.S. GAAP financial statements

We have implemented a set of controls to allow U.S. GAAP executives to perform higher level review duties timely, enhancing timely internal reviews of our U.S. GAAP financial statements. Additionally, we have implemented additional controls to prevent and detect possible misstatements to improve the interim and annual financial statement closing process.

Based upon the measures adopted, our management concluded that the actions implemented represented an improvement in the mitigation of risks in the control environment over this process and concluded that this deficiency was remediated as of December 31, 2018.2019.

Remediation activities related to tax recovery balances

We have strengthened the controls of managerial revision, through the implementation of a multidisciplinary structure of review for tax recoverable balances. In addition, reformulated our policies and procedures, in order to reinforce the control environment and ensure that these amounts be effectively considered and timely reviewed.

Based upon the measures adopted, our management concluded that the actions implemented represented an improvement in the mitigation of risks in the control environment over this process and concluded that this deficiency was remediated as of December 31, 2018.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Other than as set forth above, there have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the year ended December 31, 20182019 that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018.2019.

 

ITEM 16A.

AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT

As of the date of this annual report, Oi’s fiscal council currentlyAudit, Risks and Controls Committee includes an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of this Item 16A. Oi’s fiscal councilAudit, Risks and Controls Committee has determined that Álvaro BandeiraHenrique José Fernandes Luz is Oi’s fiscal councilaudit committee financial expert. Mr. Bandeira’sFernandes Luz’s biographical information is included in “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees.” Mr. BandeiraFernandes Luz is independent, as that term is defined in Rule10A-3 under the Exchange Act and 303A.02 of the New York Stock Exchange’sNYSE’s Listed Company Manual.

ITEM 16B.

CODE OF ETHICS

We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to members of Oi’s board of directors, fiscal council and board of executive officers, as well as to our other employees.

A copy of our code of ethics may be found on Oi’s website at http://ri.oi.com.br/conteudo_en.asp?idioma=1&conta=44&tipo=43644. The information included on Oi’s website or that might be accessed through Oi’s website is not included in this annual report and is not incorporated into this annual report by reference.

ITEM 16C.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Audit andNon-Audit Fees

On September 12, 2018, our board of directors authorized our management to hire a new independent registered public accounting firm, BDO RCS Auditores Independentes S.S. The dismissal of KPMG as our independent registered public accounting firm was effective on October 4, 2018.

The following tables set forth the fees billed to Oi by Oi’s former independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG Auditores Independentes, during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.

   Year ended
December 31,
 
   2018(2)   2017 
   (in millions of reais) 

Audit fees(1)

  R$4.5   R$5.3 

Tax fees

   0.7    0.5 

All other fees

        
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total fees

  R$5.2   R$5.8 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

(1)

Audit fees consist of the aggregate fees billed by KPMG Auditores Independentes in connection with the audits of Oi’s annual financial statements.

(2)

Excluding fees billed to Oi by Oi’s independent registered public accounting firm, BDO RCS Auditores Independentes S.S., during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.

The following tables set forth the fees billed to Oi by Oi’s independent registered public accounting firm, BDO RCS Auditores Independentes S.S., during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.2019.

 

Year ended
December 31,
2018(2)
(in millions of reais)

Audit fees(1)

R$5.0

Tax fees

All other fees

0.3

Total fees

R$5.3

   

Year ended December 31,

   

2019

  

2018

   (in millions ofreais)

Audit fees(1)

  R$5.2  R$5.0

Audit-related fees(2)

  4.4  —  

Tax fees

  —    —  

All other fees(3)

  0.4  0.3
  

 

  

 

Total fees

  R$10.0  R$5.3
  

 

  

 

 

(1)

Audit fees consist of the aggregate fees billed by BDO RCS Auditores Independentes S.S. in connection with the audits of Oi’s annual financial statements.

(2)

ExcludingAudit-related fees consist of the aggregate fees billed to Oi by Oi’s former independent registered public accounting firm, KPMGBDO RCS Auditores Independentes duringS.S. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.issuance of audit and review reports in connection with registration statements.

(3)

All other fees consist of the aggregate fees billed by BDO RCS Auditores Independentes S.S. in connection with the issuance of comfort letters.

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

Prior to May 26, 2019, Oi’s fiscal council served as its audit committee in reliance on the general exemption from the listing standards relating to audit committees contained in Rule 10A-3(c)(3) under the Exchange Act. Since May 26, 2019, Oi’s Audit, Risks and Controls Committee has served as its audit committee in reliance on the general exemption from the listing standards relating to audit committees contained in Rule 10A-3(c)(3) under the Exchange Act:

Under Brazilian law, Oi’s board of directors have approvedis prohibited from delegating its responsibilities regarding the appointment, retention and oversight of the work of any registered public accounting firm engaged for the purpose of preparing or issuing an Audit andNon-Audit ServicesPre-Approval Policy that sets forth the procedures and the conditions pursuant to whichaudit report or performing other audit, review or attestation services proposed to be performed by Oi’s independent auditors may bepre-approved. This policy is designed to (1) provide both generalpre-approval of certain types of services through the use of an annually established schedule setting forth the types of services that have already beenpre-approvedfor a certain year and, with respect to services not included in an annual schedule, specialpre-approval of services on acase-by-case basis byOi. Instead, Oi’s fiscal council or Audit, Risks and Controls Committee, as applicable, makes recommendations to Oi’s board of directors regarding the appointment, retention and oversight of the work of any registered public accounting firm engaged for such purposes and Oi’s board of directors and (2) assess compliance withis deemed to be its audit committee for such purposes. Before thepre-approval policies and procedures. engagement of any registered public accounting firm by Oi or its subsidiaries for such purposes, the engagement is approved by Oi’s management periodically reportsboard of directors. Before the engagement of any accountant by Oi or its subsidiaries to render non-audit services, the engagement was approved by Oi’s fiscal council the nature and scope of audit andnon-audit services renderedprior to May 26, 2019 or has been approved by Oi’s independent auditorsAudit, Risks and is also requiredControls Committee subsequent to report to Oi’s fiscal council any breach of this policy of which Oi’s management is aware.May 26, 2019.

 

ITEM 16D.

EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES

Oi is relying on the general exemption from the listing standards relating to audit committees contained in Rule10A-3(c)(3) under the Exchange Act for the following reasons:

Act. Oi is a foreign private issuer that has a fiscal council,an Audit, Risks and Controls Committee, which is a board of auditors (or similar body) established and selected pursuant to and as expressly permitted under Brazilian law;

Brazilian law requiresand otherwise meets the requirements of Rule10A-3(c)(3) under the Exchange Act, except that Oi’s fiscal council to be separate from Oi’s board of directors;

members of Oi’s fiscal council are not elected by Oi’s management,Audit, Risks and none of Oi’s executive officers is a member of Oi’s fiscal council;

Brazilian law provides standards for the independence of Oi’s fiscal council from Oi’s management;

Oi’s fiscal council,Controls Committee, in accordance with its own charter as approved by the full board of directors, makes recommendations to Oi’s board of directors regarding the appointment, retention and oversight of the work of any registered public accounting firm engaged (including the intermediation of disagreements between Oi’s management and Oi’s independent auditors regarding financial reporting) for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or performing other audit, review or attestation services for Oi as Brazilian law requires thatthese powers are reserved to Oi’s board of directors appoint, retain and oversee the work of Oi’s independent public accountants;under Brazilian law.

Oi’s fiscal council (1) has implemented procedures for receiving, retaining and addressing complaints regarding accounting, internal control and auditing matters, including the submission of confidential, anonymous complaints from employees regarding questionable accounting or auditing, and (2) has authority to engage independent counsel and other advisors as it determines necessary to carry out its duties; and

Oi compensates its independent auditors and any outside advisors hired by Oi’s fiscal council and provides funding for ordinary administrative expenses incurred by the fiscal council in the course of its duties.

Oi, however, dodoes not believe that its reliance on this general exemption will materially adversely affect the ability of its fiscal councilAudit, Risks and Controls Committee to act independently and to satisfy the other requirements of the listing standards relating to audit committees contained in Rule10A-3 under the Exchange Act.

 

ITEM 16E.

PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS

Not Applicable.

ITEM 16F.

CHANGE IN REGISTRANT’S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT

On September 12, 2018, our board of directors authorized our management to hire a new independent registered public accounting firm. The dismissal of KPMG as our independent registered public accounting firm was effective on October 4, 2018.Not Applicable.

During the three fiscal years ended December 31, 2018 and the subsequent interim period ended on October 4, 2018, there were no reportable events as defined under Item 16F(a)(1)(v) of Form20-F, except that KPMG advised us of the following material weakness:

We did not design, establish and maintain effective procedures to ensure adequate review, approval, and existence of sufficient supporting documentation over manual journal entries. This weakness could impact in a failure to timely detect the totality of manual journal entries, as well as their adequate approval and revision.

We did not design, establish or maintain effective controls over the communication of activity that impacted the judicial deposits and contingencies balances. Further, effective controls over the timely reconciliation of these accounts were not established or maintained.

We did not design, establish or maintain effective control over the preparation, timely review, and documented approval of the reconciliation of unbilled revenues. Specifically, we did not have effective controls over the completeness and accuracy of supporting schedules. The schedules and historical information used in this process were not reviewed in a periodic and timely manner.

We did not have sufficient and skilled accounting and finance personnel necessary to perform appropriate processes and controls related to the preparation of the financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, which includes timely identification and review of significantnon-routine transactions. As a result, a number of errors in our financial statements were detected and corrected and could not be detected on a timely basis by management in the normal course of the business.

We did not design, establish or maintain effective control over the completeness and accuracy of consolidation entries, which includes timely review of reconciliation of intercompany balances and its elimination in the consolidation process.

We did not design, establish or maintain effective control over the process level control to capture and identify the statute of limitation of its recoverable taxes.

 

ITEM 16G.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

According to the corporate governance rules of the NYSE, foreign private issuers that are listed on the NYSE, such as Oi, are subject to a more limited set of corporate governance requirements than those imposed on U.S. domestic issuers. As a foreign private issuer, Oi must comply with the following four requirements imposed by the NYSE:

 

Oi must satisfy the audit committee requirements of Rule10A-3 under the Exchange Act;

 

Oi’s Chief Executive Officer must promptly notify the NYSE in writing if any executive officer of Oi becomes aware of any materialnon-compliance with any of the applicable NYSE corporate governance rules;

 

Oi must provide a brief description of any significant ways in which Oi’s corporate governance practices differ from those required to be followed by U.S. domestic issuers under the NYSE corporate governance rules; and

 

Oi must submit an executed written affirmation annually to the NYSE and an interim written affirmation to the NYSE each time a change occurs to Oi’s board of directors or any committees of Oi’s board of directors that are subject to section 303A, in each case in the form specified by the NYSE.

Significant Differences

The significant differences between Oi’s corporate governance practices and the NYSE’s corporate governance standards are mainly due to the differences between the U.S. and Brazilian legal systems. Oi must comply with the corporate governance standards set forth under the Brazilian Corporate Law, the rules of the CVM and the applicable rules of the B3, as well as those set forth in Oi’sby-laws.

The significant differences between Oi’s corporate governance practices and the NYSE’s corporate governance standards are set forth below.

Independence of Directors and Independence Tests

In general, the NYSE corporate governance standards require listed companies to have a majority of independent directors and set forth the principals by which a listed company can determine whether a director is independent. In general, listed companies are required to comply with the following NYSE corporate governance standards:

 

have a majority of independent directors;

 

have a nominating/corporate governance committee composed of independent directors with a charter that complies with the NYSE corporate governance rules; and

 

have a compensation committee composed of independent directors with a charter that complies with the NYSE corporate governance rules.

Although Brazilian Corporate Law and Oi’sby-laws establish rules in relation to certain qualification requirements of its directors, neither Brazilian Corporate Law nor Oi’sby-laws require that Oi have a majority of independent directors nor require Oi’s board of directors or management to test the independence of Oi’s directors before such directors are appointed.

Executive Sessions

The NYSE corporate governance standards requirenon-management directors of a listed company to meet at regularly scheduled executive sessions without management.

According to the Brazilian Corporate Law, up toone-third of the members of Oi’s board of directors can be elected to management positions. The remainingnon-management directors are not expressly empowered to serve as a check on Oi’s management, and there is no requirement that those directors meet regularly without management. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Oi’s board of directors consists entirely ofnon-management directors; therefore Oi believes it would be in compliance with this NYSE corporate governance standard.

Nominating/Corporate Governance and Compensation Committees

The NYSE corporate governance standards require that a listed company have a nomination/corporate governance committee and a compensation committee, each composed entirely of independent directors and each with a written charter that addresses certain duties.

Although not required under Brazilian law, Oi has a People, Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee to assist its board of directors, with the purpose of (1) supervising human resources strategies and matters related to the organizational structure and attracting and retaining talent for Oi and its subsidiaries; (2) monitoring the succession program, the processes of selecting members of the management bodies and internal committees and special programs for human resources, at the discretion of the chairman of the board of directors; (3) analyzing and defining the total remuneration strategy and evaluating the performance of the members of the administrative bodies and the internal committees and the employees of Oi and its subsidiaries; (4) making an annual evaluation of performance, based on defined goals, of the members of the administrative bodies and internal committees of Oi; (5) monitoring the policies for corporate governance, maintaining the level of governance adopted by Oi and its subsidiaries and ensuring the effective adoption of best practices; (6) monitoring compliance with the directives established in the Listing Regulations of the Level 1 of the B3 and other policies adopted by Oi, as well as other applicable legislation, regulations and foreign good practices, including, among others, conditions for maintaining Oi’s listing on the NYSE; and (7) monitoring the corporate culture based on the principles, values and purpose defined by Oi’s board of directors, using, among other practices, internal surveys and indicators of the internal communications and whistleblower channels established by Oi.

Oi believes that the People, Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee substantially serves the functions of the committees required under NYSE corporate governance standards, although the terms of reference of this committee may not include each of the duties required under the NYSE corporate governance standards. The members of the People, Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee satisfy the independence requirements of section 303A.02 of the NYSE’s Listed Company Manual.

Audit Committee and Audit Committee Additional Requirements

The NYSE corporate governance standards require that a domestic listed company have an audit committee with a written charter that addresses certain specified duties and that is composed of at least three members, all of whom satisfy the independence requirements of Rule10A-3 under the Exchange Act and section 303A.02 of the NYSE’s Listed Company Manual.

As a foreign private issuer, that qualifies for the general exemption from the listing standards relating to audit committees set forth inSection 10A-3(C)(3) under the Exchange Act, Oi ismembers of Oi’s Audit, Risks and Controls Committee are not subject to the independence requirements of section 303A.02 of the NYSE corporate governance standards. See “Item 16D. Exemptions fromNYSE’s Listed Company Manual, although they are subject to the Listing Standards forindependence requirements of Rule10A-3 under the Exchange Act. In addition, Oi’s Audit, Committees.”Risks and Controls Committee is not required to have a written charter that addresses the duties specified in section 303A.07(b) of the NYSE’s Listed Company Manual although Oi’s Audit, Risks and Controls Committee does have a written charter that addresses these duties.

Shareholder Approval of Equity Compensation Plans

The NYSE corporate governance standards require that shareholders of a listed company must be given the opportunity to vote on all equity compensation plans and material revisions thereto, subject to certain exceptions.

Under Brazilian Corporate Law, shareholderpre-approval is required for the adoption and revision of any equity compensation plans, but this decision may be delegated to the board of directors.plans.

Corporate Governance Guidelines

The NYSE corporate governance standards require that a listed company must adopt and disclose corporate governance guidelines that address certain minimum specified standards which include: (1) director qualification standards; (2) director responsibilities; (3) director access to management and independent advisors; (4) director compensation; (5) director orientation and continuing education; (6) management succession; and (7) annual performance evaluation of the board of directors.

Oi must comply with certain corporate governance standards set forth under Brazilian Corporate Law, CVM rules and the applicable rules of the B3 for Level 1 companies. See “Item 9. The Offer and Listing—Regulation of Brazilian Securities Markets” and “Item 9. The Offer and Listing—Trading on the B3—B3 Corporate Governance Standards.” The Level 1 rules do not require Oi to adopt and disclose corporate governance guidelines covering the matters set forth in the NYSE’s corporate governance standards. However, certain provisions of Brazilian Corporate Law that are applicable to Oi address certain aspects of director qualifications standards and director responsibilities.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

The NYSE corporate governance standards require that a listed company must adopt and disclose a code of business conduct and ethics for directors, officers and employees and promptly disclose any waivers of the code for directors or officers. Each code of business conduct and ethics should address the following items: conflicts of interest; corporate opportunities; confidentiality; fair dealing; protection and proper use of company assets; compliance with laws, rules and regulations (including insider trading laws); and encouraging the reporting of any illegal or unethical behavior.

Although the adoption of a code of ethics is not required by Brazilian law, Oi has adopted a code of ethics applicable to its directors, officers and employees, which addresses each of the items listed above. See “Item 16B. Code of Ethics.”

 

ITEM 16H.

MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE

Not Applicable.

PART III

 

ITEM 17.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

We have responded to Item 18 in lieu of responding to this item.

 

ITEM 18.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Reference is made to Item 19 for a list of all financial statements filed as part of this annual report.

 

ITEM 19.

EXHIBITS

 

 (a)

Financial Statements

Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization

 

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

  F-2

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

  F-3

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Consolidated Financial Statements

  F-4

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Consolidated Financial Statements

F-5

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20182019 and 2017

2018
  F-6F-9

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016

2017
  F-8F-11

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016

2017
  F-9F-12

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016

2017
  F-10F-13

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016

2017
  F-11F-14

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

  F-13F-16

 

 (b)

List of Exhibits

 

1.01*1.01  

By-laws of Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, as amended through April 26, 2019 (English translation) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.01 to Form20-F of Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization filed on April 29, 2019).

2.01  

Form of Amended and Restated Deposit Agreement (Common Shares), among Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, The Bank of New York Mellon, as Depositary, and all Owners and Holders from time to time of American Depositary Shares issued thereunder (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 to FormF-6 of Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization filed on February 28, 2012)2012 (accession no.0001019155-12-000106)).

2.02  

Form of American Depositary Receipt representing American Depositary Shares representing Common Shares (incorporated by reference to Form 424(b)(3) filed on January 1, 2016).

2.03

Form of Amended and Restated Deposit Agreement (Preferred Shares), among Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, The Bank of New York Mellon, as Depositary, and all Owners and Holders from time to time of American Depositary Shares issued thereunder (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 to FormF-6 of Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization filed on February 28, 2012)2012 (accession no.0001019155-12-000107)).

2.04

Form of American Depositary Receipt representing American Depositary Shares representing Preferred Shares (included in Exhibit 2.03).

2.05

Judicial Reorganization Plan of Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, Telemar Norte Leste S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, Oi Móvel S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, Copart 4 Participações S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, Copart 5 Participações S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, Portugal Telecom International Finance B.V. – In Judicial Reorganization and Oi Brasil Holdings Coöperatief U.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, dated December 20, 2017 (in Portuguese) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.03 to Form20-F of Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization filed on May 16, 2018).

2.06  Judicial Reorganization Plan of Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, Telemar Norte Leste S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, Oi Móvel S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, Copart 4 Participações S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, Copart 5 Participações S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, Portugal Telecom International Finance B.V. – In Judicial Reorganization and Oi Brasil Holdings Coöperatief U.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, dated December 20, 2017 (in Portuguese) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.03 to Form 20-F of Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization filed on May 16, 2018).
2.04Judicial Reorganization Plan of Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, Telemar Norte Leste S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, Oi Móvel S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, Copart 4 Participações S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, Copart 5 Participações S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, Portugal Telecom International Finance B.V. – In Judicial Reorganization and Oi Brasil Holdings Coöperatief U.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, dated December 20, 2017 (English translation) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.04 to Form20-F of Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization filed on May 16, 2018).

2.05
2.07  

Indenture, dated as of July  27, 2018, among of Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, as the Company, Telemar Norte Leste S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, Oi Móvel S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, Copart 4 Participações S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, Copart 5 Participações S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, Portugal Telecom International Finance B.V. – In Judicial Reorganization and Oi Brasil Holdings Coöperatief U.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, as Subsidiary Guarantors, and The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee, Registrar, Principal Paying Agent and Transfer Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to FormF-1/AF-1 of Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization filed on September 4, 2018).

2.062.08  

Form of 10.000% / 12.000% Senior PIK Toggle Notes due 2025 (included in Exhibit 2.05)2.07).

2.09*

Description of Capital Stock.

2.10*

Description of Common ADSs.

2.11*

Description of Preferred ADSs.

4.01  

Call Option Agreement, dated September 8, 2014, among PT International Finance B.V., PT Portugal, SGPS, S.A., Portugal Telecom, SGPS, S.A., Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization and Telemar Participações S.A. (English translation) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.18 to Amendment No. 4 to Schedule 13D of Telemar Participações S.A. filed on September 17, 2014).

4.02  Private Instrument for the Assignment of Rights and Obligations and Other Covenants, dated March  24, 2015, among PT International Finance B.V., PT Portugal, SGPS, S.A., Portugal Telecom, SGPS, S.A., Telemar Participações S.A. and Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization (English translation) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.06 to Form20-F of Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization filed on May 7, 2015).
4.03First Amendment to the Call Option Agreement and Other Covenants, dated March  31, 2015, among PT International Finance B.V., Portugal Telecom, SGPS, S.A., Telemar Participações S.A. and Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization (English translation) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.07 to Form20-F of Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization filed on May 7, 2015).
4.04

Concession Agreement for Local, Switched, Fixed-Line Telephone Service between ANATEL and Brasil Telecom S.A., No. 109/2011, dated June 30, 2011 (English translation) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to FormF-4 of Brasil Telecom S.A. filed on September 1, 2011).

4.054.03  

Schedule of Omitted Concession Agreements for Local Switched, Fixed-Line Telephone Service (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.05 to Form20-F of Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization filed on April 27, 2012).

4.064.04  

Concession Agreement for Domestic Long-Distance, Switched, Fixed-Line Telephone Service between ANATEL and Brasil Telecom S.A., No. 143/2011, dated June 30, 2011 (English translation) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to FormF-4 of Brasil Telecom S.A. filed on September 1, 2011).

4.074.05  

Schedule of Omitted Concession Agreement for Domestic Long-Distance, Switched, Fixed-Line Telephone Service (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.07 to Form20-F of Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization filed on April 27, 2012).

4.084.06  

Statement of Authorization for Personal Mobile Services between ANATEL and Brasil Telecom Celular S.A., No. 026/2002, dated December 18, 2002 (English translation) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.05 to Form20-F of Brasil Telecom S.A. filed on July 13, 2009).

4.094.07  

Schedule of Omitted Authorizations for Personal Mobile Services (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to FormF-1/AF-1 of Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization filed on September 4, 2018).

4.104.08  

Instrument of Authorization for the Use of Radio Frequency Blocks for 2G services between ANATEL and 14 Brasil Telecom Celular S.A., No. 24/2004, dated May 3, 2004 (English translation) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.07 to Brasil Telecom S.A.’s annual report on Form20-F filed on July 13, 2009).

4.114.09  

Schedule of Omitted Instruments of Authorization for the Use of Radio Frequency Blocks for 2G services (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.11 to Form20-F of Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization filed on April 27, 2012).

4.124.10  

Instrument of Authorization for the Use of Radio Frequency Blocks for 3G services between ANATEL and 14 Brasil Telecom Celular S.A., No. 24/2008, dated April 29, 2008 (English translation) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.09 to Brasil Telecom S.A.’s annual report on Form20-F filed on July 13, 2009).

4.134.11  

Schedule of Omitted Instruments of Authorization for the Use of Radio Frequency Blocks for 3G services (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to FormF-1/AF-1 of Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization filed on September 4, 2018).

4.144.12  

Instrument of Authorization for the Use of Radio Frequency Blocks for 4G services between ANATEL and TNL PCS S.A., No. 520/2012, dated October 16, 2012 (English translation) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.16 to Form20-F of Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization filed on May 16, 2018).

4.154.13  

Schedule of Omitted Instruments of Authorization for the Use of Radio Frequency Blocks for 4G services (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.17 to Form20-F of Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization filed on May 16, 2018).

4.164.14  Subscription and Commitment Agreement, dated as of December  19, 2017, among Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, Telemar Norte Leste S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, Oi Móvel S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, Copart 4 Participações S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, Copart 5 Participações S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, Portugal Telecom International Finance B.V. – In Judicial Reorganization, Oi Brasil Holdings Coöperatief U.A. – In Judicial Reorganization and certain bondholders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.04 to Form20-F of Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization filed on May 16, 2018).

4.17Amendment No. 1 to Subscription and Commitment Agreement, dated as of July  13, 2018, among Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, Telemar Norte Leste S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, Oi Móvel S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, Copart 4 Participações S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, Copart 5 Participações S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, Portugal Telecom International Finance B.V. – In Judicial Reorganization, Oi Brasil Holdings Coöperatief U.A. – In Judicial Reorganization and certain bondholders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to FormF-1/A of Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization filed on October 4, 2018).
4.18Amendment No. 2 to Subscription and Commitment Agreement, dated as of September  4, 2018, among Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, Telemar Norte Leste S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, Oi Móvel S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, Copart 4 Participações S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, Copart 5 Participações S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, Portugal Telecom International Finance B.V. – In Judicial Reorganization, Oi Brasil Holdings Coöperatief U.A. – In Judicial Reorganization and certain investors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 to Form6-K of Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization filed on September 5, 2018).
4.19Instrument of Authorization for the Use of Radio Frequency Blocks for services under the 450 MHz spectrum, between ANATEL and Oi S.A., No. 522/2012, dated October 16, 2012 (English translation) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to FormF-1/A of Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization filed on October 4, 2018).
4.20Amendment No. 3 to Subscription and Commitment Agreement, dated as of December  10, 2018, among Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, Telemar Norte Leste S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, Oi Móvel S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, Copart 4 Participações S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, Copart 5 Participações S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, Portugal Telecom International Finance B.V. – In Judicial Reorganization, Oi Brasil Holdings Coöperatief U.A. – In Judicial Reorganization and certain investors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 to Form6-K of Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization filed on December 11, 2018).
4.21Amendment No. 4 to Subscription and Commitment Agreement, dated as of December  18, 2018, among Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, Telemar Norte Leste S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, Oi Móvel S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, Copart 4 Participações S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, Copart 5 Participações S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization, Portugal Telecom International Finance B.V. – In Judicial Reorganization, Oi Brasil Holdings Coöperatief U.A. – In Judicial Reorganization and certain investors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 to Form6-K of Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization filed on December 19, 2018).
4.22Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of December  18, 2018, by and among Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization and certain investors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to FormF-1 of Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization filed on February  1, 2018).
4.23Joinder Agreement, dated as of January  15, 2019, of CVI EMCVF Lux Securities Trading S.a.r.l. and CVI EMCVF Cayman Securities Ltd., to the Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of December  18, 2018, by and among Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization and certain investors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to FormF-1 of Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization filed on February  1, 2018).
4.24Joinder Agreement, dated as of January  23, 2019, of Solus Alternative Management LP, as investment advisor on behalf of certain related funds and accounts and those certain related funds and accounts, to the Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of December  18, 2018, by and among Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization and certain investors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to FormF-1 of Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization filed on February  1, 2018).

8.01*  

List of subsidiaries of the Registrant.

12.01*  

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

12.02*  

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

13.01*  

Certifications of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101*101.INS  XBRL Instance Document.
101.SCHXBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CALXBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.DEFXBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
101.LABXBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
101.PRE

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Extension Linkbase Document.

 

*

Filed herewith.

There are numerous instruments defining the rights of holders of long-term indebtedness of Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization and its consolidated subsidiaries, none of which authorizes securities that exceed 10% of the total assets of Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization hereby agrees to furnish a copy of any such agreements to the SEC upon request.

 

SIGNATURES

The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.

 

Date: April 26, 201930, 2020 

Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization

 

 /s/ EuricoRodrigo Modesto de Jesus Teles NetoAbreu
  Name: EuricoRodrigo Modesto de Jesus Teles NetoAbreu
  Title: Chief Executive Officer

 

Date: April 26, 201930, 2020 

Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization

 

 /s/ Carlos Augusto Machado Pereira de Almeida BrandãoCamille Loyo Faria
  Name: Carlos Augusto Machado Pereira de Almeida BrandãoCamille Loyo Faria
  Title: Chief Financial Officer and Investor Relations Officer

 

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Oi S.A. – In Judicial Reorganization

 

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting  F-2
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control over Financial Reporting  F-3
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Consolidated Financial Statements  F-4
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Consolidated Financial StatementsF-5

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20182019 and 20172018

  F-6F-9

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 20162017

  F-8F-11

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 20162017

  F-9F-12

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 20162017

  F-10F-13

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 20162017

  F-11F-14

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

  F-13F-16

 

MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal controls over financial reporting.

Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with applicable generally accepted accounting principles. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets, (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with applicable generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors, and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our CEO and CFO, our management conducted an assessment of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20182019 based on the criteria established in “Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013)” issued by COSO.

As a result of management’s assessment of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, management concluded that the following material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting existed: that we did not design, establish or maintain effective control over the completeness and accuracy of consolidation entries, which includes timely review of reconciliation of intercompany balances and its elimination in the consolidation process.

Because of the existence of these material weaknesses,2019, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was ineffectiveeffective as of December 31, 2018.2019.

The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reportingOur independent registered public accounting firm has been audited by BDO RCS Auditores Independentes S.S. as stated in their report included in this Annual Report on Form20-F, which expresses an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, as stated in their report as of December 31, 2018. Our independent registered public accountants, BDO RCS Auditores Independentes S.S., audited the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 20182019, which is included in this Annual Report on Form20-F, and their adverse opinion on the effectiveness of our internal control did not affect their audit report to our financial statements.herein.

April 26, 201930, 2020

 

/s/ EuricoRodrigo Modesto de Jesus Teles NetoAbreu  /s/ Carlos Augusto Machado Pereira de Almeida BrandãoCamille Loyo Faria

Name: Eurico

Rodrigo Modesto de Jesus Teles NetoAbreu

   

Name: Carlos Augusto Machado Pereira de Almeida Brandão

Camille Loyo Faria

Title:

Chief Executive Officer

   

Title:

Chief Financial Officer and Investor Relations Officer

 

LOGO

Tel.: +55 21 2210 5166

Fax: + 55 21 2224 5285

www.bdo.com.br

Rua Buenos Aires, 48

4º andar - Centro

Rio de Janeiro/RJ 20070-022

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To Stockholders and Board of Directors of Oi S.A. – Under Judicial Reorganization

Rio de Janeiro-RJ, Brazil.

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited Oi S.A. – Under Judicial Reorganization and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018,2019, based on criteria establishedinInternal Control – Integrated Framework(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the “COSO criteria”). In our opinion, the Company did not maintain,maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018,2019, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the consolidated balance sheet of the Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the yearthree years in the period ended December 31, 2018,2019, and the related notes (collectively referred to as “the financial statements”) and our report dated April 26, 201930, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Item 15, Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit of internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The material weakness described below have been identified and included in management assessment:

Although the Company has established effective controls with focus on the related parties’ transactions entered into 2018, the Company did not design, establish or maintain effective controls over the integrity and accuracy of prior years’ related parties’ transactions, which affects current year balance sheet, including reconciliation, review and elimination of such transactions, in the consolidation process.

This material weakness was considered in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the 2018 financial statements, and this report does not affect our report on those financial statements.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

April 26, 2019,30, 2020, Rio de Janeiro-RJ, Brazil.

/s/ BDO RCS Auditores Independentes SS

/s/ BDO RCS Auditores Independentes SS
BDO RCS Auditores Independentes SS

BDO RCS Auditores Independentes SS

LOGO

Tel.: +55 21 2210 5166

Fax: + 55 21 2224 5285

www.bdo.com.br

Rua Buenos Aires, 48

4º andar - Centro

Rio de Janeiro/RJ 20070-022

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To Stockholders and Board of Directors of Oi S.A. – Under Judicial Reorganization

Rio de Janeiro-RJ, Brazil.

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Oi S.A. – Under Judicial Reorganization and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the yearthree years in the period ended December 31, 2018,2019, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company and subsidiaries atas of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of theirits operations and theirits cash flows for each of the yearthree years in the period ended December 31, 20182019, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted inInternational Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the United States of America.International Accounting Standards Board.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018,2019, based on criteria established inInternal Control—IntegratedControl-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”), and our report dated April 26, 201930, 2020 expressed an adverseunqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.reporting as of December 31, 2019.

Change in accounting principle

As discussed in Note n°2(d.1) to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts for leases in 2019 as provided by IFRS 16, Leases. This matter is also described in the “Critical Audit Matters” section of our report.

Going Concern

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company continues to operate under Judicial Reorganization Plan (“PRJ”) in accordance with the requirements set forth in Law No. 11.101/2005 as well as has suffered recurring losses from operations, has a net accumulated deficit and has recently emerged from judicial reorganization.expects to continue to incur losses for at least the next twelve months. These events and conditions raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note No. 1. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. This matter is also described in the “Critical Audit Matters” section of our report.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements.

Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

We have served as

Critical audit matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the Company’s auditor since 2018.

April 26, 2019, Rio de Janeiro-RJ, Brazil.

/s/ BDO RCS Auditores Independentes SS

BDO RCS Auditores Independentes SS

Reportcurrent period audit of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of

Oi S.A. –– Under Judicial Reorganization - Debtor-in-possession

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Oi S.A. – Under Judicial Reorganization - Debtor-in-possession and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2017, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, shareholders’ deficit, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly,that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in all material respects,any way our opinion on the consolidated financial position ofstatements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the Company as of December 31, 2017, andcritical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the results of its operations and its cash flows for each ofcritical audit matters or on the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2017, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Going Concernconcern assessment

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company continues to operate under the PRJ in accordance with the requirements set forth in Law No. 11.101/2005 as well as has suffered recurring losses from operations, has a net capitalaccumulated deficit and netshareholders’ deficit, and needsexpects to achievecontinue to incur losses for at least the conditions of the judicial reorganization plan which include: (a) the conversion of the debt into equity of the qualified bondholders’ credits and (b) a capital increasenext twelve months. This matter is also described in the amount“Emphasis of $4 billion Reais (local currency) via a public offering. These events or conditions raise substantial doubt about itsMatter – Going Concern” section of our report.

We identified management’s judgments and assumptions used to assess the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regardconcern as a critical audit matter due to inherent complexities and uncertainties related to the Company’s projections of operations under the PRJ. Auditing these matters are alsojudgments and assumptions involved especially challenging auditor judgment due to the nature and extent of audit evidence and effort required to address these matters.

The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included the following:

Assessing the reasonableness of key assumptions underlying management’s forecast operating cash flows, including revenue growth and gross margin assumptions.

Evaluating the reasonableness of management’s forecast operating cash flows by comparing the forecasts to industry and analyst reports.

Evaluating the probability that the Company will be able to reduce capital expenditures and other operating expenditures if required.

Assessing management’s plans in the context of other audit evidence obtained during the audit to determine whether it supported or contradicted the conclusions reached by management.

Recoverability of long-term assets

As described in Note 1. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility isNotes 16 and 17 to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements, are freethe Company recorded property, plant and equipment and intangible assets of material misstatement, whetherR$ 38,910,834 thousand and R$ 3,997,865 thousand, respectively. The Company tests these assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amounts might be impaired. These calculations require the use of judgments and assumptions that may be influenced by different external and internal factors, such as economic trends, industry trends, interest rates, changes in business strategies, and changes in the type of services and products provided by the Company. The use of different assumptions in the Company’s discounted cash flow analysis could have a significant impact on the recoverable amounts of respective assets. In July 2019, the Company disclosed its new Strategic Plan, focused on improving operating and financial performance, using a sustainable business model that aims at maximizing the Company’s value in the context of judicial reorganization. As a result of the 2019 impairment testing of intangible assets, the Company recognized an impairment loss of R$ 2,111,022 thousand.

We identified management’s judgments and assumptions used to perform impairment testing over long-term assets including property, plant and equipment and intangible assets as a critical audit matter. The judgments and assumptions used in the discounted cash flow analysis include the Company’s forecasted assumptions of future revenues, gross margins, and discount rates. Auditing these judgments and assumptions involved especially challenging auditor judgment due to errorthe nature and extent of audit evidence and effort required to address these matters, including the extent of specialized skills or fraud. Our auditsknowledge needed.

The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included performing proceduresthe following:

Testing the design and operating effectiveness of controls related to management’s forecasting process, including controls over the data, inputs, and assumptions used in the discounted cash flow analysis including revenue growth rates, gross margins, and discount rates.

Evaluating the reasonableness of assumptions used in management’s discounted cash flow analysis by comparing the forecasts to: (i) historical results, and (ii) Company’s internal communications to management and the Board of Directors, including the new 2019 Strategic Plan.

Utilizing personnel with specialized knowledge and skills in valuation to assist in: (i) evaluating the reasonableness of assumptions used by comparing these assumptions to third-party industry projections and expectations, and (ii) evaluating the reasonableness of the discount rates used in the discounted cash flow analysis.

Provision for tax and civil contingencies

As described in Note 24 to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether duethe Company is a party to error or fraud,legal and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regardingadministrative proceedings at civil, labor, and tax levels, which arise from the amountsnormal course of its business. The Company has recorded tax provisions of R$ 1,050,948 thousand and disclosureshas disclosed tax contingent liabilities with possible unfavorable outcomes of R$ 28,416,097 thousand as of December 31, 2019. In addition, the Company has recorded provisions for civil matters of R$ 2,149,700 thousand and has disclosed civil contingent liabilities with possible unfavorable outcomes of R$ 1,667,990 thousand as of December 31, 2019. The Company recognizes provision in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluatingstatements for the accounting principles usedresolution of pending litigation when the Company has a present obligation as a result of a past event and significant estimates made by management as well as evaluatingdetermines that a loss is probable, and the overall presentationamount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. No provision for tax litigation is recognized in the consolidated financial statements. statements for unfavorable outcomes when, after assessing the information available: (i) management concludes that it is not probable that a loss has been incurred in any of the pending litigation or (ii) management is unable to estimate the loss of the pending matters. In the case of income tax pending litigation, management determines whether it is probable that the respective taxation authority will accept the uncertain tax treatment.

We believe that our audits provideidentified management’s judgments related to the assessment of tax and civil provisions and contingencies as a reasonable basiscritical audit matter due to the complex and significant auditor judgments required to assess the magnitude and probability of potential losses identified and evaluate the progress of and changes to expected outcomes. Auditing these judgments involved especially challenging auditor judgment due to the nature and extent of audit evidence and effort required to address these matters, including the extent of specialized skills or knowledge needed.

The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included:

With respect to the civil provisions and contingencies:

(i)

Evaluating the methodology, assumptions and criteria used by the Company in the recognition, measurement and disclosure of civil related provisions and contingencies in the consolidated financial statements;

(ii)

Reviewing external confirmation letters from the legal counselors with knowledge of civil proceedings to evaluate: (i) the existence and current status of the proceedings, and; (ii) the respective assessment of ranges of loss involved based on the appropriateness of legal positions asserted by the Company;

With respect to the tax provisions and contingencies, utilizing personnel with specialized skills and knowledge in tax matters to assist in:

(i)

Evaluating the methodology, assumptions and criteria used by the Company in the recognition, measurement and disclosure of tax related provisions and contingencies in the consolidated financial statements;

(ii)

Reviewing external confirmation letters from the legal counselors with knowledge of tax proceedings to evaluate: (i) the existence and current status of the proceedings, and; (ii) the respective assessment of ranges of loss involved based on the appropriateness of legal positions asserted by the Company;

(iii)

Evaluating the reasonableness of the defense nature, grounds and/or thesis, and possible changes in the potential outcome of loss for certain relevant tax proceedings, which involve complex judgment and subjectivity in evaluation, as well as obtaining, with the assistance of management, legal opinions from tax experts for certain proceedings with relevant changes in loss estimates.

Revenue recognition - unbilled

As described in Notes 4 and 9 to the consolidated financial statements, at December 31, 2019 the Company recorded R$ 842,726 thousand of gross revenues related to services rendered and not yet billed. The amount of revenue recognized for our opinion.unbilled services is dependent on the Company’s information technology infrastructure which requires the use of various applications and systems to process, measure, and record large volumes of transactions arising from the Company’s core operations of rendering telecommunication services.

/s/ KPMG Auditores IndependentesWe identified the recognition of unbilled revenue as a critical audit matter because of judgments required by management in estimating the amount of earned but unbilled revenues. This in turn led to a high degree of auditor judgment and effort in performing audit procedures to evaluate unbilled revenue recognition.

The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included:

Testing the design and operating effectiveness of controls related to management’s process to estimate and record unbilled revenue including controls over: (i) the IT environment, including applications and systems used in generating the information necessary for the billing process, and (ii) the integrity of accounting entries related to the revenue cycle including unbilled revenue.

Testing the reasonableness of management’s estimation of unbilled revenue through: (i) substantively testing a sample of revenue transactions by reviewing relevant supporting documentation, and (ii) testing a sample of billings completed shortly after year-end against the recorded unbilled revenue amounts.

Federal tax credits originated from legal proceedings with final and unappealable decisions

As described in Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements, during 2019 the Company recognized federal tax credits totaling approximately R$ 3 billion. The Company filed legal proceedings to claim the right to deduct ICMS from the PIS and COFINS tax bases and for the recovery of past paid amounts, within the relevant statute of limitations. In 2019, the 1st and 2nd Region Federal Courts (Brasĺlia and Rio de Janeiro) issued final and unappealable decisions favorable to the Company on two of the three primary lawsuits filed by the Company relating to the deduction of ICMS (State VAT) from the calculation bases of PIS and COFINS (taxes on sales).

We identified management’s calculations related to the federal tax credits as a critical audit matter because of the complexity of significant judgments required in the period of recognition. Auditing these judgments involved especially challenging auditor judgment due to the nature and extent of audit evidence and effort required to address these matters, including the extent of specialized skills or knowledge needed.

The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included:

Utilizing personnel with specialized skills and knowledge in federal tax matters to assist in:

(i)

Analyzing the legal documentation related to the legal proceedings with final and unappealable decisions;

(ii)

Evaluating the supporting calculations of federal tax credits made by the Company including the applicable monetary adjustments, considering the period of origin of the legal proceedings; and

(iii)

Evaluating the reasonableness of projections made by management for the segregation of the federal tax credits between short and long-term categories for the purpose of presentation in the consolidated financial statements.

Adoption of IFRS 16 Leases

As described in Note 2(d.1) to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted IFRS 16, Leases, using the modified retrospective approach, with the cumulative effect of the early implementation recognized on the date of adoption. As at January 1, 2019, the initial adoption of the standard resulted in the recognition of right-of-use assets within the noncurrent assets and corresponding lease liabilities totaling R$ 8,167,932 thousand.

We identified the adoption of IFRS 16 as a critical audit matter. Implementing the new accounting standard required management’s judgment related to: (i) evaluation of the new accounting standard and establishment of new accounting policies and practices, (ii) determining the completeness and accuracy of in scope lease contracts as of the adoption date, and (iii) evaluating inputs and assumptions used in recording the impact of the adoption including application of available practical expedients and the determination of the appropriate incremental borrowing rate. Auditing the Company’s adoption of IFRS 16 was especially challenging and complex due to the audit effort required to analyze the effect of the adoption on the significant number of lease contracts and the specialized skills and knowledge needed to assess the reasonableness of the incremental borrowing rates utilized.

The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included:

Evaluating management’s accounting policies and practices, including the reasonableness of management’s judgments and assumptions related to: (i) evaluation of the appropriate incremental borrowing rate, and (ii) evaluation of practical expedients elected.

Testing a sample of lease contracts by evaluating the appropriateness of relevant inputs and assumptions, including lease term and incremental borrowing rate, utilized by management to calculate the operating lease right-of-use asset and corresponding operating lease liability balances.

Testing the completeness and accuracy of lease contracts, included in management’s adoption procedures.

Utilizing personnel with specialized knowledge and skills in valuation to assist in assessing the reasonableness of the incremental borrowing rates used to calculate the operating lease liability as of the adoption date.

Legal investigations in the context of “Operação Mapa da Mina”

As described in Note 32(c) to the consolidated financial statements, on December 10, 2019, the Brazilian Federal Police launched the 69th phase Operation: Lava Jato (Car Wash), named “Operation: Mapa da Mina” (Mine Plan). In response to allegations, the Company has created a Multidisciplinary Committee consisting of members from different departments, including the legal, compliance, internal audit and accounting department, to determine procedures to be performed, and set a schedule of relevant activities in response to the allegations of the investigation involving the Company and its subsidiaries. The Company’s Audit Committee oversees the activities of the Multidisciplinary Committee on a continuous basis.

We identified management’s assessment of pending legal investigation as a critical audit matter. Auditing management’s positions and procedures performed in response to the alleged illegal acts committed by the Company, the uncertainties inherent to the investigations still in progress by the MPF and PF involved especially challenging auditor judgment due to the nature and extent of audit evidence and effort required to address these matters, including the extent of specialized skills or knowledge needed.

The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included:

Utilizing personnel with specialized skills and knowledge in forensic matters to assist in:

(i)

Reviewing and observing the appropriateness and the scope of procedures performed and conclusions reached in the Company’s internal independent investigation conducted by the independent and specialized law firm.

(ii)

Evaluating the nature of the matters discussed in the reports prepared by the external legal advisors of the Company and whether such matters may represent possible legal and regulatory impact related to various claims included in the investigations in progress from the MPF and PF.

(iii)

Evaluating the appropriateness of management’s conclusions derived from the internal independent investigation and assessing the appropriateness of possible impact on the recognition, measurement and disclosure in the consolidated financial statements.

(iv)

Evaluating various supporting documents collected by management during the Company’s internal independent investigation and assessing the appropriateness of conclusions reached.

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2012.2018.

April 30, 2020, Rio de Janeiro, BrazilJaneiro-RJ, Brazil.

May 15, 2018

/s/ BDO RCS Auditores Independentes SS
BDO RCS Auditores Independentes SS

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial Reorganization –Debtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2018 and 2017

(In thousands of Brazilian Reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

   Note   12/31/2018   12/31/2017 

Current assets

      

Cash and cash equivalents

   7    4,385,329    6,862,684 

Short-term investments

   7    201,975    21,447 

Trade accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of R$1,870,350 in 2018 and R$1,342,211 in 2017

   8    6,516,555    7,367,442 

Recoverable income taxes

   9    621,246    1,123,510 

Other taxes

   10    803,252    1,081,587 

Judicial Deposits

   11    1,715,934    1,023,348 

Inventories

     317,503    253,624 

Prepaid expenses

     743,953    307,162 

Pension plan assets

   23    4,880    1,080 

Held-for-sale assets

   26    4,923,187    4,675,216 

Other assets

     1,079,670    780,627 
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current assets

     21,313,484    23,497,727 

Non-current assets

      

Long-term investments

   7    36,987    114,839 

Other taxes

   10    715,976    627,558 

Deferred tax assets

   9    23,050   

Judicial Deposits

   11    7,018,786    8,289,762 

Investments

   12    117,840    136,510 

Property, plant and equipment, net

   13    28,468,798    27,083,454 

Intangible assets

   14    8,025,442    9,254,839 

Pension plan assets

   23    753,827    1,699,392 

Other assets

     773,411    282,687 
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Totalnon-current assets

     45,934,117    47,489,041 
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

     67,247,601    70,986,768 

Liabilities not subject to compromise

      

Current liabilities

      

Trade payables

   15    5,225,862    5,170,970 

Borrowings and financing

   16    672,894    54,251 

Payroll, related taxes and benefits

     906,655    924,560 

Income taxes payable

   9    27,026    567,129 

Other taxes

   10    1,033,868    1,443,662 

Tax financing program

   18    142,036    278,277 

Dividends and interest on capital

     6,168    6,222 

Provision for contingencies

   19    680,542   

Unearned revenues

   21    229,497    139,012 

Advances from customers

     73,094    402,774 

Licenses and concessions payable

   17    85,619    20,306 

Liabilities associated toheld-for-sale assets

   26    526,870    354,127 

Other payables

   20    629,939    469,214 
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

     10,240,070    9,830,504 

Non-current liabilities

      

Trade payables

   15    3,593,008   

Borrowings and financing

   16    15,777,012   

Other taxes

   10    628,716    867,664 

Deferred taxes liabilities

   9    —      497,375 

Tax financing program

   18    411,170    610,500 

Provision for contingencies

   19    4,358,178    1,368,435 

Liability for pensions benefits

   23    579,122    72,374 

Unearned revenues

   21    1,687,073    1,633,816 
Advances from customers         142,134    67,143 

   Note   December 31, 2019   December 31, 2018 

Current assets

      

Cash and cash equivalents

   8    2,081,945    4,385,329 

Short-term investments

   8    183,850    201,975 

Accounts receivable

   9    6,334,526    6,516,555 

Inventories

     326,934    317,503 

Recoverable income taxes

   10    542,726    621,246 

Other taxes

   11    1,089,391    803,252 

Judicial Deposits

   12    1,514,464    1,715,934 

Dividends and interest on capital

   29    426   

Pension plan assets

   27    5,430    4,880 

Prepaid expenses

   13    670,344    743,953 

Held-for-sale assets

   31    4,391,090    4,923,187 

Other assets

   14    852,155    1,079,670 
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current assets

     17,993,281    21,313,484 

Non-current assets

      

Long-term investments

   8    33,942    36,987 

Deferred tax assets

   10    99,175    23,050 

Other taxes

   11    2,995,559    715,976 

Judicial Deposits

   12    6,651,383    7,018,786 

Pension plan assets

   27    54,615    64,253 

Prepaid expenses

   13    583,736    522,550 

Other assets

   14    437,667    250,862 

Investments

   15    133,765    117,840 

Property, plant and equipment, net

   16    38,910,834    28,425,563 

Intangible assets

   17    3,997,865    6,948,446 
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Totalnon-current assets

     53,898,541    44,124,313 
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

     71,891,822    65,437,797 
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Current liabilities

      

Trade payables

   18    4,794,309    5,024,260 

Trade payables – Subject to the JRP

   18    799,631    201,602 

Payroll, related taxes and benefits

     852,585    906,655 

Derivative financial instruments

   19    1,152   

Borrowings and financing

   20    326,388    672,894 

Income taxes payable

   10    66,654    27,026 

Other taxes

   11    886,763    1,033,868 

Dividends and interest on capital

     5,731    6,168 

Licenses and concessions payable

   21    58,582    85,619 

Leases payable

   22    1,510,097   

Tax financing program

   23    86,721    142,036 

Provisions

   24    547,996    680,542 

Liabilities associated toheld-for-sale assets

   31    494,295    526,870 

Other payables

   25    1,405,013    1,381,919 
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial Reorganization –Debtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2018 and 2017

(In thousands of Brazilian Reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

Licenses and concessions payable

  17   —    604 
  Note   December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018 

Total current liabilities

     11,835,917   10,689,459 

Non-current liabilities

     

Trade payables – Subject to the JRP

   18    3,293,427  3,593,008 

Borrowings and financing

   20    17,900,361  15,777,012 

Other taxes

   11    1,224,038  628,716 

Leases payable

   22    6,639,929  

Tax financing program

   23    330,782  411,170 

Provisions

   24    4,703,684  4,358,178 

Provision for pension plans

   27    633,012  579,122 

Other payables

  20   631,622  583,186    25    7,534,166  6,505,321 
    

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

 

Totalnon-current liabilities

     27,808,035   5,701,097      42,259,399   31,852,527 

Prepetition liabilities subject to compromise

  29   —     65,139,228 
    

 

  

 

 

Total liabilities

     38,048,105   80,670,829      54,095,316   42,541,986 

Shareholders’ equity (deficit)

  22   

Preferred shares, no par value

     4,094,909  4,094,909 

Authorized 157,727 shares; issued and outstanding 155,915 shares in 2018 and 155,915 in 2017

     

Common shares, no par value

     27,943,562  17,343,465 

Authorized 2,298,247 shares; issued and outstanding 2,266,217 shares in 2018 and 519,752 in 2017

      —   
    

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

 

Total share capital

     32,038,471  21,438,374 

Shareholders’ equity

   26    

Share capital

     32,538,937  32,038,471 

Share issuance costs

     (444,943 (444,943     (801,073 (377,429

Capital reserves

     16,053,166  17,762,545      3,906,771  11,532,995 

Treasury shares

     (2,803,250 (5,531,092     (33,315 (2,803,250

Accumulated losses

     (17,727,954 (17,530,108

Other comprehensive loss

     (1,817,634 (1,175,521     (233,040 (208,359

Accumulated losses

     (14,069,804 (42,026,880

Shareholders’ equity (deficit) attributable to the Company and subsidiaries

     28,956,006   (9,977,517
    

 

  

 

 

Shareholders’ equity attributable to the Company and subsidiaries

     17,650,326   22,652,320 
    

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

 

Non-controlling interest

  26   243,490   293,456      146,180   243,491 
    

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

 

Total Shareholders’ equity (deficit)

     29,199,496   (9,684,061

Total shareholders’ equity

     17,796,506   22,895,811 
    

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

 

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

     67,247,601   70,986,768      71,891,822   65,437,797 
    

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial Reorganization –Debtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian Reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

   Note   2018  2017  2016 

Net operating revenue

   4    22,060,014   23,789,654   25,996,423 

Cost of sales and services

   5    (15,822,732  (15,676,216  (16,741,791
    

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross profit

     6,237,282   8,113,438   9,254,632 
    

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating (expenses) income

      

Selling expenses

   5    (4,478,352  (4,399,936  (4,383,163

General and administrative expenses

   5    (2,697,865  (3,064,252  (3,687,706

Other operating income (expenses), net

   5    417,159   (1,043,922  (1,237,085

Reorganization items, net

   28    31,580,541   (2,371,918  (9,005,998
    

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income (loss) before financial and taxes

     31,058,765   (2,766,590  (9,059,320
    

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Financial expenses, net

   6    (4,012,067  (1,612,058  (4,375,309
    

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income (loss) before income taxes

     27,046,698   (4,378,648  (13,434,629

Income tax expense (current and deferred)

   9    347,139   350,987   (2,245,113
    

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss) for the year

     27,393,837   (4,027,661  (15,679,742
    

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss) attributable to owners of the Company

     27,369,422   (3,736,518  (15,502,132

Net income (loss) attributable tonon-controlling interests

     24,415   (291,143  (177,610
    

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss) allocated to common shares – basic and diluted

     24,525,692   (2,874,290  (11,924,904

Net income (loss) allocated to preferred shares – basic and diluted

     2,843,730   (862,228  (3,577,228

Weighted average number of outstanding shares

      

(in thousands of shares)

      

Common shares – basic and diluted (note 22)

     1,344,686   519,752   519,752 

Preferred shares – basic and diluted (note 22)

     155,915   155,915   155,915 

Net income (loss) per share from continuing operations:

      

Common shares - basic and diluted

     18.24   (5.53  (22.94

Preferred shares - basic and diluted

     18.24   (5.53  (22.94
   Note   December 31, 2019  December 31, 2018  December 31, 2017 

Net operating revenue

   4    20,136,183   22,060,014   23,789,654 

Cost of sales and services

   5    (15,314,814  (16,179,100  (15,668,653
    

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross profit

     4,821,369   5,880,914   8,121,001 
    

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating (expenses) income

      

Selling expenses

   5    (3,547,684  (3,853,002  (4,102,556

General and administrative expenses

   5    (2,782,300  (2,738,718  (3,136,808

Other operating income

   5    4,527,710   2,204,134   1,985,101 

Other operating expenses

   5    (5,996,465  (6,761,586  (5,227,766
    

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
     (7,798,739  (11,149,172  (10,482,029
    

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
      

Loss before financial income (expenses) and taxes

     (2,977,370  (5,268,258  (2,361,028

Financial income

   6    2,662,463   30,950,461   7,136,459 

Financial expenses

   6    (8,772,181  (4,341,595  (10,332,971
    

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Financial income (expenses)

     (6,109,718  26,608,866   (3,196,512
    

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Profit (loss) before taxes

     (9,087,088  21,340,608   (5,557,540

Income tax expense (current and deferred)

      

Current

   7    (77,060  115,706   (906,080

Deferred

   7    69,041   3,159,241   (192,542
    

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Profit (loss) for the year

     (9,095,107  24,615,555   (6,656,162
    

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Profit (loss) attributable to owners of the Company

     (9,000,434  24,591,140   (6,365,019

Profit (loss) attributable tonon-controlling interests

     (94,673  24,415   (291,143

Profit (loss) allocated to common shares – basic and diluted

     (8,764,803  22,036,074   (4,896,241

Profit (loss) allocated to preferred shares—basic and diluted

     (235,631  2,555,066   (1,468,778

Weighted average number of outstanding shares (in thousands of shares)

      

Common shares – basic and diluted

     5,788,447   1,344,686   519,752 

Preferred shares – basic and diluted

     155,615   155,915   155,915 

Profit (loss) per share from continuing operations:

      

Common shares—basic and diluted

   26    (1.51  16.39   (9.42

Preferred shares—basic and diluted

   26    (1.51  16.39   (9.42

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Oi S.A. – Under Judicial Reorganization –Debtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements Comprehensive Income (loss) for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian Reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

   2018  2017  2016 

Net income (loss) for the year

   27,393,837   (4,027,661  (15,679,742

Other comprehensive income (loss)

    

Foreign currency translation adjustments

   (110,098  165,713   (1,176,359

Decrease of interest shares in subsidiary

    (374,130 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   (110,098  (208,417  (1,176,359

Pension and other postretirement benefit plans:

    

Net actuarial loss from continuing operations

   (918,782  (130,846  (120,357

Less amortization of prior service cost and actuarial loss included in net periodic pension cost

   —     —     (755
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Pension and other postretirement benefit plans

   (918,782  (130,846  (121,112

Changes in effective portion of the fair value of hedging financial instrument

   —     —     546,253 

Less reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income (loss)

   —     —     64,360 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
     610,613 

Income tax effect on other comprehensive income (loss):

    

Pension and other postretirement benefit plans

   312,386   32,157  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   312,386   32,157   —   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Other comprehensive loss

   26,677,343   (4,334,767  (16,366,600

Less comprehensive income (loss) attributable tonon-controlling interest

   (49,966  (64,153  (399,551
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net comprehensive income (loss) attributable to controlling shareholders

   26,727,309   (4,270,614  (15,967,049
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   2019  2018  2017 

Profit (loss) for the year

   (9,095,107  24,615,555   (6,656,162

Hedge accounting loss

   (1,152  

Actuarial gains (losses)

   (9,795  105,515   30,253 

Exchange losses on investment abroad

   (16,372  (110,098  163,770 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Pre-tax comprehensive income

   (9,122,426  24,610,972   (6,462,139
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Effect of taxes on other comprehensive income:

    

Actuarial loss

    (35,875  (10,371
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income (loss) for the year

   (9,122,426  24,575,097   (6,472,510
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to owners of the Company

   (9,025,115  24,625,063   (6,203,313

Comprehensive loss attributable tonon-controlling interests

   (97,311  (49,966  (269,197

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial Reorganization –Debtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity / (Deficit) for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian Reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

   Attributable to owners of the Company  Total equity /
(deficit) attributed
to controlling
shareholders
  Non-controlling
shareholders
  Total
equity/
(deficit)
 
  Share
capital
   Share
issue
costs
  Capital
reserves
  Treasury
shares
  Accumulated
losses
  Other
comprehensive
income (loss)
 

Balance at December 31, 2015

   21,438,374    (444,943  17,762,545   (5,531,092  (22,788,230  (609,895  9,826,759   1,190,547   11,017,306 
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Loss for the year

        (15,502,132   (15,502,132  (177,610  (15,679,742

Other comprehensive loss

         (464,917  (464,917  (221,941  (686,858
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2016

   21,438,374    (444,943  17,762,545   (5,531,092  (38,290,362  (1,074,812  (6,140,290  790,996   (5,349,294
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Loss for the year

        (3,736,518   (3,736,518  (291,143  (4,027,661

Other comprehensive loss

         (100,709  (100,709  (206,397  (307,106
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2017

   21,438,374    (444,943  17,762,545   (5,531,092  (42,026,880  (1,175,521  (9,977,517  293,456   (9,684,061
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

ASC 606 recognized

        655,112    655,112    655,112 

Balance at January 01, 2018

   21,438,374    (444,943  17,762,545   (5,531,092  (41,371,768  (1,175,521  (9,322,405  293,456   (9,028,949
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Issuance of shares to settle notes

   10,600,097     1,013,883      11,613,980    11,613,980 

Delivery of treasury shares to settle notes

      (2,727,842  2,727,842      

Exercise of warrants

      4,580      4,580    4,580 

Net income for the year

        27,369,422    27,369,422   24,415   27,393,837 

Other comprehensive loss

        (67,458  (642,113  (709,571  (74,381  (783,952
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2018

   32,038,471    (444,943  16,053,166   (2,803,250  (14,069,804  (1,817,634  28,956,006   243,490   29,199,496 
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  Attributable to owners of the Company  Total
controlling
interest
  Non-controlling
interest
  Total
shareholders’
equity
 
 Share
capital
  Share
issuance
costs
  Capital
reserves
  Treasury
shares
  Accumulated
losses
  Other
comprehensive
loss
 

Balance at December 31, 2017

  21,438,374   (377,429  13,242,374   (5,531,092  (42,335,925  (242,282  (13,805,980  293,457   (13,512,523

Effects of the first-time adoption of IFRS 9 and 15

      282,135    282,135    282,135 

Balance at January 1st, 2018

  21,438,374   (377,429  13,242,374   (5,531,092  (42,053,790  (242,282  (13,523,845  293,457   (13,230,388

Capital increase

  10,600,097    1,013,883      11,613,980    11,613,980 

Delivery of treasury shares as per the JRP

    (2,727,842  2,727,842      

Share subscription warrants

    4,580      4,580    4,580 

Profit for the year

      24,591,140    24,591,140   24,415   24,615,555 

Other comprehensive income

      (67,458  33,923   (33,535  (74,381  (107,916

Balance at December 31, 2018

  32,038,471   (377,429  11,532,995   (2,803,250  (17,530,108  (208,359  22,652,320   243,491   22,895,811 

Capital increase

  500,466    3,837,009      4,337,475    4,337,475 

Share issuance costs

   (423,644      (423,644   (423,644

Share buyback

     (2,572    (2,572   (2,572

Pharol Agreement (Note 1)

    (2,462,799  2,772,507   (197,846   111,862    111,862 

Loss for the year

      (9,000,434   (9,000,434  (94,673  (9,095,107

Absorption of capital reserves

    (9,000,434   9,000,434     

Other comprehensive loss

       (24,681  (24,681  (2,638  (27,319

Balance at December 31, 2019

  32,538,937   (801,073  3,906,771   (33,315  (17,727,954  (233,040  17,650,326   146,180   17,796,506 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial Reorganization –Debtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian Reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

   2018  2017  2016 

Operating activities

    

Net income (loss) for the year

   27,393,837   (4,027,661  (15,679,742

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash provided by operating activities

    

Loss (gain) on financial instruments

   3,415,354   (1,115,823  (5,342,872

Derivatives financial instruments

   —     —     5,150,478 

Depreciation and amortization

   5,952,905   5,881,302   6,310,619 

Impairment (reversal) ofheld-for-sale securities

   (292,799  267,008   1,090,295 

Provision for bad debt

   1,224,248   784,403   729,752 

Provision (reversal) for contingencies

   (19,465  143,517   1,056,410 

Provision for pension plans

   (114,813  (197,141  (198,554

Impairment (reversal) of assets

   —     46,534   225,512 

Deferred tax expense (benefit)

   (231,433  (1,257,068  1,532,299 

Reorganization items, net

   (31,580,541  2,371,918   9,005,998 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisition:

    

Accounts receivable

   (365,771  (253,469  (390,361

Other taxes

   121,951   477,164   (618,074

Purchase of short-term investments

   (1,191,664  (601,200  (1,877,885

Redemption of short-term investments

   1,103,920   775,456   3,570,453 

Trade payables

   (860,900  (374,003  (585,813

Payroll, related taxes and benefits

   (253,902  (42,727  (175,690

Provision for contingencies

   (434,974  (114,336  (692,001

Net increase in income taxes refundable and payable

   (799,189  399,182   213,586 

Pension plans

   —     54   (50,000

Employee and management profit sharing

   237,253   298,789   84,000 

Changes in assets and liabilities held for sale

   (257,643  701,416   (557,330

Other

   (183,838  238,443   299,240 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities    

   2,862,536   4,401,758   3,100,320 
   December 31,
2019
  December 31,
2018
  December 31,
2017
 

Cash flows from operating activities

    

Profit (loss) before taxes

   (9,087,088  21,340,608   (5,557,540

Non-cash items

    

Loss (gain) on financial instruments (Note 6)

   3,606,618   (2,043,357  5,120,203 

Fair value adjustment to borrowings and financing (Note 6)

   527,465   (13,928,659 

Present value adjustment to other liabilities (Note 6)

   59,214   (1,167,043  (4,873,000

Gain on the restructuring of third-party borrowings (Note 6)

    (11,054,800 

Transaction with derivative financial instruments (Note 6)

   (55,025  

Depreciation and amortization (Note 5)

   6,873,945   5,811,123   5,109,292 

Onerous obligation (Note 5)

   1,230,820   4,883,620  

Expected credit losses on receivables (Note 5)

   489,396   851,271   784,403 

Impairment losses (reversal) (Note 5)

   2,111,022   291,758   (4,747,141

Provisions/(reversals) (Note 5)

   216,438   93,026   7,362,304 

Earnings of equity investees

   5,174   13,492   433 

Loss on disposal of capital assets

   235,535   215,398   211,735 

Concession Agreement Extension Fee – ANATEL

   359,465   68,333   88,658 

Employee and management profit sharing

   260,207   237,253   298,789 

Tax Recovery (Notes 5 and 6)

   (3,617,919  

Monetary correction to provisions/(reversals) (Note 6)

   1,620,378   226,870   674,668 

Monetary correction to tax refinancing program (Note 6)

   16,159   28,079   27,294 

Other

   (538,974  (637,251  450,281 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   4,312,830   5,229,721   4,950,379 

Changes in assets and liabilities

    

Accounts receivable

   (306,240  (365,771  (253,469

Inventories

   (21,113  (48,280  173,283 

Taxes

   1,322,267   121,951   477,164 

Investment and redemption of financial assets

   40,141   (87,744  174,256 

Trade payables

   (678,046  (860,900  (374,003

Payroll, related taxes and benefits

   (313,169  (253,902  (42,727

Licenses and concessions

   (127,313  

Provisions

   (462,299  (434,974  (426,649

Changes in assets and liabilities held for sale

   (29,829  (257,643  701,416 

Other assets and liabilities

   (252,683  525,660   (467,067
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   (828,284  (1,661,603  (37,796

Financial charges paid – debt

   (926,910  (19,215  (1,412

Financial charges paid – other

   (352  (2,884  (2,515

Income tax and social contribution paid – Company

   (85,680  (495,038  (314,162

Income tax and social contribution paid – third parties

   (159,966  (188,445  (192,736
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   (1,172,908  (705,582  (510,825
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash generated by operating activities

   2,311,638   2,862,536   4,401,758 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Continued

  December 31,
2019
  December 31,
2018
  December 31,
2017
 

Cash flows from investing activities

    

Capital expenditures

   (7,425,513  (5,246,241  (4,344,238

Proceeds from the sale of investments, tangibles and intangibles

   106,097   22,276   5,016 

Dividends received from investments abroad (Note 33)

   226,525   

Judicial deposits

   (477,010  (775,953  (425,563

Redemption of judicial deposits

   719,223   1,083,043   343,129 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

   (6,850,678  (4,916,875  (4,421,656

Cash flows from financing activities

    

Repayment of principal of borrowings, financing, and derivatives

   (11,824  (161,884  (659

Proceeds from derivative financial instrument transactions

   72,113   

Capital increase

   4,000,000   

Commitment to investors premium

   (58,489  

Payments of obligation for licenses and concessions

    (1,491  (104,449

Payments of obligation for tax refinancing program

   (151,862  (265,495  (226,776

Payment of dividends and interest on capital

   (437  (54  (59,462

Payment of Leases

   (1,611,273  

Exercise of warrants

    4,580  

Share buyback

   (2,572   (300,429
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash used in financing activities

   2,235,656   (424,344  (691,775

Foreign exchange differences on cash equivalents

    1,328   11,105 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash flows for the year

   (2,303,384  (2,477,355  (700,568
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

    

Closing balance

   2,081,945   4,385,329   6,862,684 

Opening balance

   4,385,329   6,862,684   7,563,252 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Changes in the year

   (2,303,384  (2,477,355  (700,568
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Additional Disclosures Relating to the Statement Of Cash Flows

Non-cash transactions

 

   December 31,
2019
   December 31,
2018
   December 31,
2017
 

Acquisition of Property, Plant and Equipment and Intangible assets (incurring liabilities)

   490,395    1,034,475    1,451,068 

Offset of judicial deposits against provision for contingencies

   395,143    845,088    382,071 

Shares issued to backstop investors

   337,475     

Settlement of payables for own shares (Pharol Agreement - Notes 1 and 26 (b))

   46,680     

Conversion of debt into shares

     11,613,980   

Reconciliation of liabilities resulting from financing activities

The changes in financial charges and the settlement of the debt resulting from financing activities are presented in Note 20.

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial Reorganization – Debtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian Reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

   2018  2017  2016 

Investing activities

    

Capital expenditures

   (5,246,241  (4,344,238  (3,263,571

Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment

   22,276   5,016   6,405 

Cash received for the sale of PT Portugal (Note 25)

    

Purchase of judicial deposits

   (775,953  (425,563  (1,366,907

Redemption of judicial deposits

   1,083,043   343,129   706,657 

Other

    
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) by in investing activities

   (4,916,875  (4,421,656  (3,917,416

Financing activities

    

Repayment of principal of borrowings, financing

   (161,884  (659  (6,223,703

Cash impacts on derivatives transactions

     443,709 

Payments of obligation for licenses and concessions

   (1,491  (104,449  (204,779

Payments of obligation for tax refinancing program

   (265,495  (226,776  (96,638

Share buyback

    (300,429 

Payment of dividends and interest on capital

   (54  (59,462  (37,806

Exercise of warrants

   4,580   —     —   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash used in financing activities

   (424,344  (691,775  (6,119,217

Foreign exchange differences on cash and cash equivalents

   1,328   11,106   (398,499

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

   (2,477,355  (700,567  (7,334,812

Cash and cash equivalents beginning of year

   6,862,684   7,563,251   14,898,063 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents end of year

   4,385,329   6,862,684   7,563,251 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Non-cash transactions

    
   2018  2017  2016 

Conversion of debt into shares

   11,613,980   

Acquisition of Property, Plant and Equipment and Intangible assets (incurring liabilities)

   1,034,475   1,451,068   1,873,573 

Offset of judicial deposits against provision for contingencies

   845,088   382,071   1,841,299 

Other transactions

    
   2018  2017  2016 

Income taxes paid

   (683,483  (506,898  (499,228

Financial charges paid

   (22,099  (3,927  (2,232,977

Operating cash payments resulting from the judicial reorganization relating to professional fees

   (633,676  (369,938  (252,915

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

1.

BASIS OF PRESENTATIONGENERAL INFORMATION

Oi S.A. - Under– under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession (“Company” or “Oi”), is a Switched Fixed-line Telephony Services (“STFC”) concessionaire, operating since July 1998 in Region II of the General Concession Plan (PGO)(“PGO”), which covers the Brazilian states of Acre, Rondônia, Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso do Sul, Tocantins, Goiás, Paraná, Santa Catarina and Rio Grande do Sul, and the Federal District, in the provision of STFC as a local and intraregional long-distance carrier. FromSince January 2004, on, the Company also provides domestic and international long-distance services in all Regions and since January 2005 started to provide local services outside Region II.II started to be provided in January 2005. These services are provided under concessions granted by Agência Nacional de Telecomunicações - es—ANATEL (National Telecommunications Agency), the regulator of the Brazilian telecommunications industry (“ANATEL” or “Agency”).

The Company is headquartered in Brazil, in the city of Rio de Janeiro, at Rua do Lavradio, 71 – 2º andar.

The Company also holds: (i) through its wholly-owned subsidiary Telemar Norte Leste S.A. - Under– in Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession (“Telemar”) a concession to provide fixed telephone services in Region I and nationwide International Long-distance services; and (ii) through its indirect subsidiary Oi Móvel S.A. - Under– in Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession (“Oi Móvel”) a license to provide mobile telephony services in Region I, II and III.

In Africa, the Company provides fixed and mobile telecommunications services through own subsidiaries and the subsidiaries of Africatel Holdings B.V. (“Africatel”), and in Asia the Company provides fixed, mobile, and other telecommunications services basically related through its subsidiary Timor Telecom (Note 31).

The Company is registered with the Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commission (“CVM”) and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Its shares are traded on B3 S.A. – Brasil, Stock Exchange, OTC (“B3”) and its American Depositary Receipts (“ADRs”) representing Oi common shares and preferred shares are traded on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”).

Concession agreements

The local and nationwide STFC long-distance concession agreements entered into by the Company and its subsidiary Telemar with ANATEL are effective until December 31, 2025. These concession agreements provide for reviews on a five-year basis and in general have a higher degree of intervention in the management of the business than the licenses to provide private services, and include several consumer protection provisions, as perceived by the regulator. On December 30, 2015, ANATEL announced that the review to be implemented byservices. At the end of 2015 had been postponed2018, ANATEL published Public Hearing No. 51/2018 to April 30, 2016. Subsequently, On April 29, 2016, ANATEL decided, under a Resolution Circular Letter, to postpone until December 31, 2016address the executionrevision of the revised agreements. On December 30, 2016 and under a Resolution Circular Letter, ANATEL postponed againConcession Agreements for the execution of the new concession agreements up to June 30, 2017. On June 29, 2017, ANATEL informed, in an official letter, that it would no longer make any further amendmentsconcession’s last five-year period (2021-2025). The contribution period to the concession agreements at this instance. Note that untilPublic Hearing ended on March 26, 2019, and the end of the concession agreement on December 31, 2025 there would still be a period for revision, on December 31, 2020.draft in being analyzed by ANATEL. It is worth noting that Congress Bill 79/2016 provides for a special amendment of concession agreementsthe recently enacted Law 13879/2019 creates the legal possibility to adjust them tomigrate from the possibility of migrating from a public utility regime to anthe STFC service provision under a private law regime. Thus, if this bill is passed into law, the concession agreement is(still subject to amendmentregulation by ANATEL), as well as the possibility of successive renewals of the Concession over a20-year period.

On December 21, 2018, the Government enacted Decree 9619/2018, which repeals Decree 7512/2011 and approves a New PGMU (“PGMU IV”). The highlight of the New PGMU is the fact that the New PGMU introduces a significant reduction in any date other thanthe plant of payphones (“TUP”) currently in use. As a replacement for the payphones no longer required, the concessionaires are required to implement wireless fixed access systems supporting broadband connections in certain locations, the deadline of which is December 31, 2020. Throughout2023.

With the years,approval of the Judicial Reorganization Plan (“PRJ” or “Plan”), ANATEL initiated some procedures aiming at monitoring the Company’s financial situation, as well as to assess theits Company’s ability to discharge its obligations arising from the terms of the concession agreements. In lightMarch 2019, ANATEL decided, among other issues, to maintain the special monitoring of the approvalprovision of the Judicial Reorganization Plan by the creditors and its subsequent ratification by the competent court, ANATEL started to monitortelecommunications services of the Oi Group Companies’companies in 2019 by imposing actions related to transparency, corporate governance, and corporate control, financial and operating performance, and financial positionsasset and credit management, as informed in the Notice to the Market disclosed by the Company on May 8, 2019.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

On February 10, 2020, as reported in the Notice to the Market released by the Company, ANATEL’s Board of Directors concluded there was no longer the need for special monitoring based on the effectiveness of said Judicial Reorganization Plan (JRP).

The Company is registered withdecision issued in May 2019 as it considers that the Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commission (“CVM”) and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Its shares are traded on B3 S.A. – Brasil, Stock Exchange, OTC,Company’s and its American Depositary Receipts (“ADRs”) representing Oi common sharessubsidiaries’ short-term liquidity risk has been extinguished and preferred shares tradedrevoked the obligations previously imposed on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”).Oi Group companies.

Judicial Reorganization

1.1.

JUDICIAL REORGANIZATION

On June 20, 2016, Oi, together withthe Company – under Judicial Reorganization and its direct and indirect wholly owned subsidiaries Oi Móvel, Telemar, Copart 4 Participações S.A. – Underunder Judicial Reorganization -Debtor-in-Possession(“Copart 4”)4), Copart 5 Participações S.A. – Underunder Judicial Reorganization -Debtor-in-Possession(“Copart 5”), merged, see Nota 32), Portugal Telecom International Finance B.V. – Under—under Judicial Reorganization, -Debtor-in-Possession (“PTIF”), and Oi Brasil Holdings Cooperatief U.A. – Under—under Judicial Reorganization -Debtor-in-Possession (“Oi Holanda”) (collectively with the Company, the “Oi Companies” or “JR Debtors”) filed as a matter of urgency, a requestpetition for judicial reorganization with the Court of the State of Rio de Janeiro as approved by the Company’s Board of Directors and the competent governing bodies.

Oi S.A. - Under (“Judicial Reorganization – Debtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

On November 29, 2017, the Judicial Reorganization Court determined once again the postponement of the General Creditors Meeting (“CGM”Proceeding”) to December 19, 2017, on its first notice to convene, which may continue on December 20, 2017, if necessary, and February 1, 2018, on its second notice to convene, which may continue on February 2, 2018, if necessary..

On December 19, 2017, after confirming that the required quorum of classes I, II, III, and IV creditors was in attendance, the CGMGeneral Creditors’ Meeting was held and the JRPOi Companies’ judicial reorganization plan (“Plan” or “PRJ”) was approved by a vast majority of creditors on December 20, 2017.

On January 8, 2018, the judicial reorganization court (“Judicial Reorganization CourtCourt”) issued a decision ratifyingthat ratified the JRP and grantinggranted the judicial reorganization to the Oi Companies. Said decisionCompanies, which was published on February 5, 2018, initiating the period for the creditors of the Judicial Reorganization Debtors (“JR Debtors”) to elect one of the payment options to recover their claims, as provided for in the JRP, which ended on February 26, 2018, except for bondholders, whose deadline was extended to March 8, 2018, as decided by the Judicial Reorganization Court on February 26, 2018.

On July 20, 2018, the Board of Directors ratified in part the Capital Increase – Claim Capitalization, approved at the Board of Directors’ meeting held on March 5, 2018. This approval was provided after verification of the results of the new common shares’ subscription calculation by the Company’s shareholders, which exercised their preemptive right and by the holders of the Qualified Bondholders’ Unsecured Claims through the capitalization of their related claims, as provided for by the JRP.

Under Brazilian law, prior to issuing the Common Shares underlying the newly issued Common ADSs or the Warrants underlying the newly issued ADWs to holders of Defaulted Bonds, Oi was required to conduct a preemptive offer of those Common Shares and Warrants to all holders of its Common Shares and Preferred Shares. Holders of Common ADSs and Preferred ADSs were not entitled to participate in that preemptive offer.

Holders of preemptive rights were entitled to subscribe to Common Shares and the associated Warrants during a subscription period commencing on June 15, 2018 and ending on July 16, 2018 at a subscription price of R$7.00 per Common Share. Holders of Common Shares and Preferred Shares subscribed for 68,263 Common Shares and 5,197 Warrants in the preemptive offer. The cash proceeds of the preemptive offer was required to be made available to holders of Defaulted Bonds in lieu of the subscribed Common Shares and Warrants.

Under the JRP, the Qualified Recovery with respect to each US$1,000 of Qualified Bondholder Credits consisted of approximately:

US$195.61 aggregate principal amount of New Notes;

38.57 Common ADSs representing 192.83 Common Shares for a total of 1,514,299,603 shares valued at $10,600,097,221 in partial settlement of the bonds;

2.75 ADWs; and

US$0.01 in cash.

In the July 28, 2018 Board of Directors meeting, the Board ratified the issuance of subscription warrants to subscribers who participated in the preemptive offering and to qualified Bondholders pursuant to the terms of the Capital Increase – Claims Capitalization.

Pursuant to Article 72 of the Bylaws then in effect and because of a dilution of Company’s shareholding base in excess of 50% as a result of the Capital Increase – Claim Capitalization, the voting constraint therein was discontinued and immediately and irrevocably ceased to have any effect with respect to the exercise of voting rights by the Company’s shareholders.

On July 31, 2018, the Company that it had completed the restructuring of the Companies under ReorganizationOi Companies’ financial debt was completed with the implementation of the applicable JRP terms and conditions represented byprovided for in the JRP, including the completion of the first capital increase provided for in the JRP, Capital Increase – Claim Capitalization.

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial Reorganization – Debtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

NotesOn January 25, 2019 the Company completed the second capital increase provided for in the JRP (“Capital Increase—New Funds”), with the issue of 3,225,806,451 book-entry, registered common shares, without par value, including new common shares represented by ADSs, pursuant to the Financial StatementsJRP and the subscription and commitment agreement entered into by the Company, its subsidiaries, and the Backstop Investors.

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

1.2.

CAPITAL INCREASE – NEW FUNDS

As part of the approved JRP, on October 26, 2018, the Board of Directors approved the Capital Increase – New Funds within the authorized capital ceiling set in Oi’s Bylaws, through

Exercise of Subscription Warrants and American Depositary Warrants (“ADWs”)

On October 28, 2018, Oi commenced the issuance and delivery of three billion, two hundred twenty-five million, eight hundred six thousand, four hundred fifty-one (3,225,806,451) new common shares, at the price of R$1.24 per share (“New Common Shares”), for total consideration of R$4.0 billion, in line with the JRP provisions. Any holder of Company common shares (“Common Shares”) and/all warrants and ADWs exercised by their holders. The process was completed on January 4, 2019. All warrants that were not exercised on or Company preferred shares (“Preferred Shares”), including the custody agent of the American Depositary Shares Program (“ADSs Custodian”) representing Company Common Shares and/or Company Preferred Shares (“ADS”), is ensured the preemptive rightprior to subscribe New Common Shares issued as a resultJanuary 2, 2019 have been cancelled.

Preferential offer and completion of the Capital Increase – New Funds, pursuant to Article 171 of Law 6404/1976. Any and all New Common Shares not subscribedthe commitment agreement terms

As contemplated by existing common and/or preferred shareholders under their preemptive rights are to be subscribe by the Backstop Investors pursuant the deadlines and termsSection 6 of the Commitment Agreement between the Company and the Backstop Investors. The preemptive rights were eligible to be exercised upon effectiveness of the U.S. SEC registration statement the Company filed relating to the sale of New Common Shares and ADS. The SEC declared the registration statement effectiveJRP, on November 13, 2018 upon which the Company disclosedcommenced a Notice to Shareholders communicating the start date of the preemptive right exercise period, as well as other terms and conditions.

Also on October 26, 2018, the Company became aware that the members of ANATEL’s Board of Directors unanimously decided to grant a preapproval of the Capital Increase – New Funds.

Between October 3 and December 31, 2018, 115,913,355 common shares have been issued to pursuant to the exercise of warrants that were issued as part of the Capital Increase – Claims Capitalization transaction, including subscription warrants represented by 22,798,378 American Depository Warrants. On January 4, 2019, 275,985 common shares have been issued to pursuant to the exercise of warrants that were issued as part of the Capital Increase – Claims Capitalization transaction, including subscription warrants represented by 55,197 American Depository Warrants. The Subscription Warrants not exercised up to and including January 2, 2019 and the ADWs not exercised up to and including December 26, 2018 have expired and can no longer be exercised.

On December 19, 2018, the Company noticed to Holders of ADSs informing that it changed certain terms of the Rights Offer. The Company entered into an amendment to the Commitment Agreement, under which the Backstop Investors holders of 60% of the total amounts of the backstopcommitments (“Majority of the Backstop Investors”) agreed to extend the deadlines and waive certain pending conditions precedent to finance its backstopcommitments, including the requirement to publish the updated General Universal Service Targets Plan (“New PGMU”). The Company also informed that it will pay to the ADS Depository the ADS issue rate of the New Common ADSs. As a result, the Deposit Amount of the New Common ADSs would no longer be used to pay the ADS issue rate, which would increase the portion returned to the holders of Common ADSs Rights exercised its Common ADSs Rights to subscribe the initial New Common ADSs or New Common ADSs Surpluses.

On January 11, 2019, the Company’s Board of Directors verified and confirmed the issuance of 1,530,457,356 New Common Shares that were subscribed within the preemptive right exercise period of new common shares, at the issue price of R$1.24 per share, for total proceeds of R$1,897,767,121.44. From the total of New Common Shares issued, (i) 856,519,080 were delivered to the ADS Depositary so that the ADSs corresponding to such New Common Shares were issued, which were delivered to the holders of ADSs to exercise their preemptive rights, and (ii) 673,938,276 New Common Shares were delivered to the holdersoffering of common shares and preferred shares that exercised their respective preemptive rights.

Onwas registered with the same date,SEC under the Company’s Board of Directors verified the result of the requests regarding the excess distribution of new common shares (“Excess New Common Shares”) not subscribed within the preemptive right exercise period of new common shares. TheSecurities Act under which holders of common shares and preferred shares, including the ADS Depository,Depositary and The Bank of New York Mellon, as depositary of the Preferred ADS program, received transferable rights for each common share or preferred share held as of November 19, 2018, which refers to as subscription rights.

The subscription rights expired on January 4, 2019. On January 16, 2019, the Company issued 1,530,457,356 common shares to holders of subscription rights that had exercised those subscription rights with respect to the initial common shares. On January 21, 2019, the Company issued 91,080,933 common shares to holders of subscription rights that had requested a total of 91,322,933subscriptions for excess distributioncommon shares. The Company’s Boardproceeds of Directors also confirmed that because the number of Excess New Common Shares requested was lower than the total number of Excess New Common Shares available, the Excess New Common Shares requests filed by the holders of common shares and preferred shares and the holders of ADSs would be fully met.these subscriptions totaled R$2,011 million.

 

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

On January 21,25, 2019, the Company’s Board of Directors verifiedCompany issued 1,604,268,162 common shares, representing the payment of the Excess New Common Shares and confirmed the issue of 91,322,933 Excess New Common Shares subscribed by the holderstotal number of common shares that were offered in the preemptive offering less the total number of initial common shares and preferredexcess common shares, including 49,156,560 Excess New Common Shares subscribed by the ADS Depository pursuant to the instructions received from holders of ADSs, at the issue price of R$1.24 per share, which resultedBackstop Investors in the contribution of R$113,000,000.00 to the Company. On the same date, the Company’s Board of Directors confirmed that the 1,604,268,162 New Common Shares not subscribed within the preemptive right exercise period and the subscription of Excess New Common Shares would be subscribed by the Backstop Investors,a private placement under the terms of the Plan andcommitment agreement for the Commitment Agreement. Also on the same date, the Company’s Boardaggregate amount of Directors verified that the Backstop Investors representing 84.4%R$1,989 million (“Share Balance”). Because of the total guarantee commitmentsubscription and payment of the Share Balance, the Company completed, on this date, the Capital Increase – New Funds, elected, under the terms of the Plan and the Commitment Agreement, to receive the guarantee commitment premium de commitment of the Capital Increase – New Funds in common shares, as provided for by Section 5 of the Commitment Agreement, and approved, therefore, in strict compliance with the Plan and the Commitment Agreement confirmed in court, the issue of 272,148,705 shares (“Commitment Shares”).

On January 28, 2019, the Company informed that, in compliance with the Plan and the terms of the Capital Increase – New Funds, on January 25, 2019 1,604,268,162 New Common Shares were subscribed and paid in, corresponding to the balance of common shares not subscribed by the shareholders within the preemptive right exercise period and the Excess New Common Shares period (“Balance of New Common Shares”). This concluded the Capital Increase – New Funds, provided for by Clause 6 of the Plan, through the subscription and payment of all 3,225,806,451 New Common Shares issued as part of the Capital Increase – New Funds, representing a contribution of new funds for the Company totaling R$4,000,000,000.00. The4.0 billion. In addition, under the terms of the commitment agreement, on that date the Company also informed that,issued, as compensation for their commitments under the commitment agreement, 272,148,705 common shares in strict compliance with the Plan and the Commitment Agreement,a private placement to the Backstop Investors that elected to receive their commitment premium in shares, as provided for by Clause 6.1.1.3 of the Plan and the Commitment Agreement, subscribed and paid inUS$13 million to the Commitment Shares, issue price of R$1.24 per share, in the form of American Depositary Shares. In lightBackstop Investors. As a result of the outcome of the subscription and payment of the New Common Shares issued as part of the Capital Increase – New Funds and the Commitment Shares, the Company’spaid-in share capital increased to R$32,538,937,370.00, (R$32,038,471,375.00 of share capital plus R$500,465,995.00 of additionalpaid-in capital), represented by 5,954,205,001 shares, divided into 5,796,477,760 registered common shares and 157,727,241 registered preferred shares, without par value.

Litigation discontinuation settlement between the Company and Pharol

1.3.

CREDITORS SETTLEMENT PROGRAM

On June 23, 2017, as authorizedFebruary 8, 2019, in order to discontinue any disputes that might harm the implementation of the JRP, the Company disclosed a Material Fact Notice informing that its Board of Directors approved, in accordance with CVM Instruction 567/2015, the acquisition of 1,800,000 preferred shares issued by the Company to ensure the compliance of the commitment assumed by the Company to transfer its treasury shares to Bratel, wholly-owned subsidiary of Pharol SGPS, S.A., in the context of the settlement entered into, subject matter of the Material Fact Notice of January 8, 2019 (“Settlement”), in transactions conducted in B3’s OTC to deliver the treasury shares to Bratel, which would be made within four business days from the confirmation of the settlement by the Judicial Reorganization Court.

On February 18, 2019, the Court issued a decision suspending conflict of jurisdiction injunction No. 157.099 during the period requested by the parties.

On April 3, 2019, the Company initiateddisclosed a programnotice to enter into settlement agreements with the Oi Companies’ creditors listed in the Judicial Administrator’s List of Creditors, published on May 29, 2017 (“Oi Creditor” and “Creditors Settlement Program” or “Program”, respectively), and creditors could join the program via the websitewww.credor.oi.com.br.

The Creditors Settlement Program was applicable for creditors with claims amountingmarket to R$50,000 or lower, and allowed the prepayment of 90% of the claiminform on the acceptance of the creditor and the remaining 10% of the claim after the approval of the JRP, to be paid under the terms and conditions of the Creditors Settlement Program. A Oi Creditor whose claim was higher than R$50,000 would be entitled to join the Creditors Settlement Program, in which case they would receive a R$50,000 prepayment, upon acceptance by such Oi Creditorconfirmation of the settlement, underreferred to above, because the terms and conditions set outfifteen-day term for the publication of the related court decision has run out. Accordingly, as determined in the Creditors Settlement, Program and the exceeding amount will be paid as set out in the Plan. The Creditors Settlement Program benefited the participating Oi Creditors as it allowedterm for the prepayment ofcompliance with the second part of the amount underobligations established by both parties to the Program.Settlement started on this same date, including: (a) the request to discontinue all the litigation involving the parties named in the Agreement and (b) the delivery to Bratel of 33.8 million Oi shares there were held in treasury, including 32 million common shares and 1.8 million preferred shares.

Approximately 35,000 creditors jointed the Creditors Settlement Program, of which about 30,000 in BrazilIn addition, several obligations and 5,000 in Portugal, and approximately R$360 million were made available for the prepaymentrights of the settlements entered into underparties described in the Program.Material Fact Notice released by Oi and the Communication released by Pharol, both on January 9, 2019, were fully clearly established.

 

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

1.4.

PRE-PETITION CLAIMS, REGULATORY AGENCIES

Default Payment Method provided for by Clause 4.3.6 of the Plan—Bondholders

On May 20, 2019, in strict compliance with the decision issued under Chapter 15 that determined that the cancelation of the notes regulated by New York Law should take place on June 14, 2019, the Company announced that it started the procedure so that the holders of the notes (a) Portugal Telecom International Finance B.V.’s €500,000,000 in 4.375% notes maturing in 2017 (ISIN No.: XS0215828913); (b) Portugal Telecom International Finance B.V.’s €750,000,000 in 5.875% notes maturing in 2018 (ISIN No.: XS0843939918); (c) Portugal Telecom International Finance B.V.’s €750,000,000 in 5.00% notes maturing in 2019 (ISIN No.: XS0462994343); (d) Portugal Telecom International Finance B.V.’s €1,000,000,000 in 4.625% notes maturing in 2020 (ISIN No.: XS0927581842); (e) Portugal Telecom International Finance B.V.’s €500,000,000 in 4.5% notes maturing in 2025 (ISIN No.: XS0221854200); (f) Oi Brasil Holdings Coöperatief U.A.’s €600,000,000 in 5.625% notes maturing in 2021 (ISIN No.: XS1245245045); (g) Oi Brasil Holdings Coöperatief U.A.’s US$1,500,000,000 in 5.75% notes maturing in 2022 (ISIN No.: US10553MAD39); (h) Oi S.A.’s €750,000,000 in 5.125% notes maturing in 2017 (ISIN No.: XS0569301327); (i) Oi S.A.’s US$750,000,000 9.500% maturing in 2019 (ISIN No.: 87944LAD1); (j) Oi S.A.’s BRL1,100,000,000 in 9.75% maturing in 2016 (ISIN No. US10553MAC55); and (k) Oi S.A.’s US$1,000,000,000 in 5.500% maturing in 2020 (ISIN No. 144A: US87944LAE92) (the “Legacy Notes”) are able to support their claims to receive on a future date or on the Company’s payment dates pursuant to Clause 4.3.6 of the Plan.

The procedure detailed above is not applicable for the holders of the 6.25% Notes issued by Portugal Telecom International Finance B.V. – in Judicial Reorganization maturing in 2016 (ISIN No.: PTPTCYOM0008). The Company has reported that it has knowledge of regulatory punitive administrative proceedings and lawsuits that could amountwill provide at the appropriate time the information on the procedure to approximately R$14.5 billion as at June 30, 2016, including fines imposed, expected fines to be imposed and corresponding monetary variations. The Company disagreed and challenged a material portionregister the beneficiaries of the noncompliance events pointed outDefault Payment Method provided for by ANATEL and challenged the disproportionatenessClause 4.3.6 of the punitive actions taken, emphasizing their unreasonableness.Plan with regard to such series.

Prepetition Financing – Clause 5.3 of the Plan

On December 23, 2019, the Company disclosed a Material Fact Notice informing that its subsidiary Oi Móvel entered into a 1st issue indenture of collateralized, simple, nonconvertible debentures, with additional trust security, in a single series, for private placement, in the total amount of up to R$2,500,000,000.00 (“Debentures” and “Issue”, respectively). The main features of the Issue and the Debentures are as follows: (i) Term and Maturity Date: twenty-four (24) months from the issue date, except in the case of early redemption and early maturity of the Debentures set forth in the Debenture Indenture; (ii) Payout: U.S. dollar foreign exchange fluctuation plus interest of (i) twelve pointsixty-six percent (12.66%) per year (PIK) for the first twelve months after the first repayment is made; and (ii) thirteen pointsixty-one percent (13.61%) per year thereafter; and (iii) Guarantees: the Debentures will be backed by collaterals and trust guarantees provided by Oi Móvel, the Company and its subsidiary Telemar.

The JRP, asIssue was approved atbased on the CGMprovisions of Clause 5.3 of the Plan and is part of the context of prepetition financing, in the “Debtor in Possession Financing” (“DIP Financing”) modality.

Subsequently to the Material Fact Notice disclosed on December 20, 201723, 2019, the Company disclosed a Notice to the Market on February 4, 2020 informing shareholders and subsequently ratified bythe general market that the subscription and payment of the Oi Móvel Issue had been completed, described above, for private placement in the amount of R$2,500,000,000.00.

Extension of the Judicial Reorganization

On December 6, 2019, the Company released a Material Fact Notice informing that the Oi Companies filed a petition with the Judicial Reorganization Court requesting that the court oversight of the Oi Companies not to be terminated on January 8, 2018, lays downFebruary 4, 2020, the payment methoddate when the Plan’s homologation completes two years.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationPre-petitionDebtor-in-Possession Claims, Regulatory Agencies,and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

Thenon-termination of the judicial oversight does not introduce any changes to the current position of the Oi Companies and has no impact on the compliance with the Plan in force or on current receivables, or any other new funds that might be obtained by the Oi Companies. It is worth noting that the continuity of court oversight at the end of thetwo-year period is a natural measure that has been applied in most judicial reorganization proceedings.

Notwithstanding the good progress of the Plan implementation, which include ANATEL’snon-tax claims amountinghas already concluded most of the steps provided for the proceeding, which were important for the Company’s recovery, said petition presents the Judicial Reorganization Court with circumstances related to approximately R$14.5 billion asthe complexity inherent to the Judicial Reorganization Proceeding’s magnitude and to the reforms underway in the legal and regulatory environment, and which require actions still to be implemented within the scope of June 30, 2016:the Judicial Reorganization Proceeding.

On February 28, 2020, the Company released a Material Fact Notice informing its shareholders and the general market that on February 28, 2020 the Oi Companies filed with the Judicial Reorganization Court a petition exposing its interest in submitting for deliberation to a new general creditors’ meeting (“New GCM”) an amendment to the Plan aimed at achieving greater operating and financial flexibility to continue its investment project and the compliance with its strategic transformation plan (“Strategic Plan”), both broadly disclosed to the market.

In line with the foregoing, on March 6, 2020, the Company disclosed a Material Fact Notice informing that the Judicial Reorganization Court awarded a decision, on the same date, granting the Company’s request for a New General Creditors’ Meeting to deliberate on an amendment to the Plan, prescribing that:

 

 (i)

Payment of nontaxpre-petition claims that are under the jurisdiction of the Federal Attorney General’s Office (AGU) in two hundred forty (240) installments, commencing June 30, 2018, as follows: (i) from the 1st to the 60th installment: 0.160%; (ii) from the 61st to the 120th installment: 0.330%; (iii) from the 121st to the 180th installment: 0.500%; (iv) from the 181st to the 239th installment: 0.660%; and (v) 240th installment: the outstanding balance. The first installments shall be fully paid by cashing amounts initially deposited in courts as collateral of these claims, to be supplemented, if necessary, in cash. Beginning in the subsequent month, Oi shall pay the other installments in cash. As from the second installment, the monthly installments shall be adjusted for inflation using the SELIC (Central Bank’s policy rate);

Because the other nontaxpre-petition claims of regulatory agencies challenged at the administrative level are illiquid up to this date, they shall be paid as laid down in Clause 4.3.6 of the JRP, general payment method of unsecure claims.

Note, however, that ANATEL filed interlocutory appealNo. 001068-32.2018.8.19.0000 against the decision that ratified the judicial reorganization plan, alleging the invalidity of Clause No. 4.3.4, which sets the method for settlement of ANATEL’s claims. This appeal is pending trial.

Accordingly, the court decisions in effect establish that ANATEL’snon-tax claims against the Company are subject to the judicial reorganization proceeding and shall be paid as provide for byPre-petition Claims, Regulatory Agencies (Clause 4.3.4 of the approved and ratified Judicial Reorganization Plan), as decided by the Oi Group’s creditors at the CGM, and decided by the Judicial Reorganization Court, pursuant to Law 11101/2005.

1.5.

PAYMENT PROPOSALS IN THE JRP APPROVED AT THE CGM ON DECEMBER 20, 2017, RATIFIED BY THE JUDICIAL REORGANIZATION COURT ON JANUARY 8, 2018 AND IN EFFECT BY DECEMBER 31, 2018

The Oi Group’s creditors shall become creditors of the debt(s) issued by the JR Debtor that was their original debtor.

CLAIMS FROM CREDITORS

This section presents a summarized version of the key terms of the repayment Plan to Oi Group Creditors, including certain information on the financial terms and conditions included in the JRP.

Note that, as defined in Appendix 1.1 to the JRP, the publication date of the Judicial Reorganization Court’s decision ratifying the JRP, i.e., the lower court decision granting the judicial reorganization, against which no appeal with a suspensory effect is upheld, which is January 8, 2018, published on the Official Gazette on February 5, 2018, is taken into consideration for purposes of the way the time limit in the payment terms is counted.

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial Reorganization – Debtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

According to the approved JRP, there are 4 Classes of creditors, as follows:

Class I – Labor Claims

General rule: labor claims shall be paid in five (5) equal monthly installments, with a180-day grace period after the Court Ratification of the Plan. Labor claims not yet acknowledged shall be paid in five (5) equal monthly installments, with asix-month grace period after a final, unappeasable court on the amount due decision is issued.

Labor Claims that are collateralized by judicial deposits:

Shall be paid through the immediate withdrawal of the amount deposited in court.

If the deposited amount is lower than the debt listed by the Oi Companies, the deposit shall be used to pay part of the debt and the outstanding balance shall be paid after a decision is issued by the Court that ratifies the amount due in five (5) equal monthly installments, with a180-day grace period from the Court Ratification of the Plan. If the deposit is higher than the debt, the Oi Companies shall withdraw the difference.

Labor Claims not collateralized by judicial deposits shall be paid via judicial deposits attached to the court records of the related case.

Fundação Atlântico (pension fund) claims:

Payable in six (6) annual, equal installments, with a five-year grace period as from the Court Ratification of the Plan.

Interest/monetary variation: five-year grace period for interest. National Consumer Price Index (INPC) + 5.5% per year, levied as from the Court Ratification of the Plan, annually accrued during the grace period and payable annually, as from the sixth year, together with the principal installments.

Class II – Collateralized Payables

Class 2 claims shall be paid as follows:

Each creditor shall receive the original debt amount, as disclosed in the List of Creditors, adjusted by the interest/monetary variation rate, as follows:

Principal shall be repaid as follows:

72-month grace period for principal as from the Court Ratification date of the Judicial Reorganization Plan;

Principal shall be repaid in 108 monthly installments, as described in the table below:

Months

Percentage of the amount to be
repaid per month

0 a 72nd

0.0%

73rd to 132nd

0.33%

133rd to 179th

1.67%

180th

1.71%

Four-year grace period on interest.

Interest: Long-term Interest Rate, released by the Central Bank, plus spread of 2.946372%, where the interest levied in the first four (4) years shall not be paid and shall be accrued annually and added to the principal.

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial Reorganization – Debtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

Classes III and IV – Unsecured Creditors and MBOs/SBs

The payment proposal for claims of Unsecured Creditors and Micro-business Owners (“MBOs”) and Small Businesses (“SBs”) is described below, according to the thresholds established in the JRP:

Linear payment to Unsecured Creditors:

Linear payment to Unsecured Creditors: Unsecured Creditors’ and MEs/EPPs’ claims of amounting up to R$1,000 were paid in a single installment within 20 business days after the Court Ratification of the Plan.

Unsecured Creditors and MEs/EPPs with claims above R$1,000 can elect to receive their claims in a single installment, providing that they agree to receive only R$1,000 as the full payment of their claims an related costs, payable within 20 business days after the end of the period to elect the payment option.

Unsecured Creditors with Judicial Deposits: Class 3 and 4 claims held by Unsecured Creditors shall be paid after the withdrawal of the judicial deposits, using the following discount percentages:

Claim Amount Interval

Discount %

Up to R$1,000.00

0%

R$1,000.01 to R$5,000.00

15%

R$5,000.01 to R$10,000.00

20%

R$10,000.01 to R$150,000.00

30%

Over R$150,000.00

50%

Shall be paid through the withdrawal of the deposited amount;

If the deposit is lower than the debt (after the discount above, as applicable), the deposit shall be used to pay part of the debt and the outstanding balance shall be paid after a decision issued by the competent court that ratifies the amount due according to the General Payment Method described below;

If the deposit is higher than the debt (calculated after the discount above, as applicable), The Oi Companies shall withdraw the difference.

Unsecured Creditors and MEs/EPPs that are not paid as provided for above can opt for payments using one of the five restructuring options described below, limited to a maximum amount per offer.

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial Reorganization – Debtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

Restructuring Option 1:

Part of Classes 3 and 4 claims shall be denominated in Brazilian reais by the amount of Classes 3 and 4 Creditors that elected this option, up to a ceiling of R$10,000,000,000; these Creditors can elect one of the following methods: (i) claim restructuring; (ii) private debentures, or (iii) public debentures.

Part of Classes 3 and 4 claims shall be denominated in US dollars by the amount claimed of Classes 3 and 4 Creditors that elected this option, up to a maximum of US$1,150,000,000.

60-month grace period on principal;

Principal shall be repaid in 24 semiannual, successive installments, as shown in the table below:

Six-month periods

Percentage of the amount to be
repaid persix-month period

0 to 10th

0.0%

11th to 20th

2.0%

21st to 33rd

5.7%

34th

5.9%

The interest rate shall be (i) an annual rate equivalent to 80% of the interbank deposit rate (CDI) for claims denominated in Brazilian reais and (ii) 1.75% per year for claims denominated in US dollars; interest shall be annually accrued to the principal and paid semiannually as from the 66th month after the Ratification of the Judicial Reorganization Plan;

Once this offer’s maximum amounts are reached, the outstanding balances of the claims payable under this offer shall be paid according to the General Payment Method described below.

Restructuring Option 2:

The claims of the Creditors that elect this payment method shall be restructured in US dollars within up to six (6) months after the Court Ratification of the Plan, limited to a maximum of US$850,000,000.

60-month grace period on principal;

Principal shall be repaid in 24 semiannual, successive installments, as shown in the table below:

Six-month periods

Percentage of the amount to be
repaid persix-month period

0 to 10th

0.0%

11th to 20th

2.0%

21st to 33rd

5.7%

34th

5.9%

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial Reorganization – Debtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

Interest of 1.25% per year, annually accrued to the principal and paid semiannually as from the 66th month after the Ratification of the Judicial Reorganization Plan, where:

During the principal grace period, 10% of total interest shall be paid semiannually, while the remaining 90% shall be accrued to the principal annually. After this period, 100% of total interest shall be paid semiannually.

Once this offer’s maximum amounts are reached, the outstanding balances of the claims payable under this offer shall be paid according to the General Payment Method described below.

The creditors’ rights granted under this offer can only be assigned with the prior consent of Oi.

Restructuring Option 3:

Restructuring of unqualified bonds:

This offer is available only to bondholders with claims up to US$750,000, and it is limited to a maximum of US$500,000,000.

50% discounts, firstly applied to interest and subsequently to principal.

Grace period on principal: six years as from the Ratification of the Plan.

Principal shall be equivalent to 50% of the unqualified bondholders’ claims, capped at US$250,000,000, and shall be repaid in twelve (12) semiannual, successive installments, as shown in the table below:

Six-month periods

percentage of the amount to be
repaid persix-month period

0 to 12th

0.0%

13th to 18th

4.0%

19th to 23rd

12.66%

24th

12.70%

Interest: 6% per year in US dollars, annually accrued to the principal as from the 78th month after the Court Ratification of the Plan.

Restructuring of qualified bonds:

This offer is available only to bondholders with claims in excess of US$750,000, which will receive the following:

Common shares issued by Oi and currently held by PTIF;

New notes;

New I Common Shares; and

Subscription Warrants

Exchange ratios: for each US$664,573.98:

9,137 common shares issued by Oi and currently held by PTIF;

New Notes, issued at the overall price of US$145,262, which consists of a par value of US$130,000 and an issue premium of US$15,262;

119,017 New I Common Shares;

9,155 Subscription Warrants.

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial Reorganization – Debtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

Note: the exchange ratios assume that the number of Oi common shares and Oi preferred shares is 825,760,902.

The New Notes shall be issued in US$1,000 multiples and shall have a maximum par value of R$6,300,000,000, equivalent to a maximum par value of US$1,918,100,167.

Maturity: 7th year after its issue date.

Principal: shall be repaid in a bullet payment maturing on the 84th month after its issue date;

Interest: can be paid under one of the following two methods:

10% per year, paid semiannually; or

During the first three (3) years as from the plan’s ratification, 12% interest paid semiannually, of which 8% of the annual interest paid is in cash semiannually and 4% compounded semiannually and paid in the 36th month after the issue date of the New Notes, and beginning in the 4th year when annual 10% interest in being charged, paid semiannually.

The New I Common Shares shall be due as a result of the capital increase, through the capitalization of the claims:

Up to 1,756,054,163 New I Common Shares shall be issued with par value ranging from R$6.70 to R$7 to a total ranging from R$11,765,562,892.10 to R$12,292,379,141.

Subscription warrants: Oi shall issue up to 135,081,089 subscription warrants.

On June 13, 2018, ANATEL agreed with the restructuring of the qualified bonds, in Decision No. 336/2018, authorizing the stages necessary for the capital increase of the other actions required for complying with Clause 4.3.3.2 of the JRP. Specifically, the authorized conversion entailed the issue of new shares, the dilution of the current shareholders’ interests, the capital increase, and the change of the Company’s current shareholding structure. ANATEL ratified the determination of any change in the Company’s Board of Directors that must be previously submitted to the Regulator’s review.

On June 18, 2018, the Superintendent General of the Administrative Economic Defense Council (“CADE”) (Brazilian antitrust authority) decided, under SG Order No. 753/2018, not to acknowledge the qualified bonds’ restructuring transaction, which had been cautiously notified to said authority exclusively to ensure the compliance with JRP within the prescribed deadlines. According to the CADE Superintendent General, the transaction was not acknowledged because it did not meet the revenue requirement prescribed by Law 12529/2011. No complaints were filed against this decision.

With the confirmation of the CADE’s decision and taking into account ANATEL’s Steering Board’s decision that granted the preapproval requested by the Company to complete the capital increase provided for by Clause 4.3.3.2 of the JRP, all the conditions precedent listed by the Plan, needed to undertake said capital increase, were either verified or waived, considering that the related conversion of debt into equity instruments was implemented after the ratification of the JRP, on February 5, 2018.

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial Reorganization – Debtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

Restructuring Option 4: General Payment Method

This offer applies to creditors that do not meet the terms and conditions of the previous offers or if the offers highlighted above exceed their maximum amounts and the creditor still holds an outstanding balance.

Principal shall be repaid in five (5) equal annual, successive installments after the20-year grace period.

Interest/monetary variation:

Interest equivalent to TR, a benchmark rate, per year in the case of unsecure claims whose holders elect to receive payment for their claims in Brazilian reais; this interest shall be levied as from the Court Ratification of the Plan, and total interest and monetary variation accrued in the period shall be paid only and together with the last principal installment.

No interest, in the case of unsecured claims whose holders elect to receive payment for their claims in US dollars.

The Company shall have an early repayment option consisting of the payment of 15% of principal and accrued interest.

Payment maximum: R$70,000,000,000, minus the amount ofpre-petition claims that are restructured under the other offers of the Plan.

Restructuring Option 5: Strategic Supplier Creditors

The claims of Strategic Supplier Creditors, suppliers of goods and/or services that kept the terms and conditions practiced prior to the filing of the Judicial Reorganization Plan, that do not arise from loans or financing facilities granted to the Oi Companies, shall be paid, up to a maximum of R$150,000, within up to 20 business days after the end of the period to elect the payment option.

If these suppliers have claims in excess of R$150,000, they shall receive the outstanding amount minus a 10% discount in four (4) equal annual, successive installments, plus (i) TR + 0.5% in the case of real-denominated claims and (ii) 0.5% per year in the case of US dollar- or euro-denominated claims.

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial Reorganization – Debtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

CLAIMS FROM RELATED PARTIES

Claims that refer to intragroup loans among the JR Debtors, by using cash generated by transactions conducted in the international market by the JR Debtors, shall be paid as described below:

Principal shall be repaid beginning on the 20th year after the settlement of the General Payment Method claims. Principal shall be repaid in five (5) equal annual, successive installments.

Interest/monetary variation: TR for real-denominated intragroup claims 0.5%, levied as from the Court Ratification of the Plan. Total interest and monetary variation accrued in the period shall be paid only and together with the last principal installment. No interest, in the case of dollar- or euro-denominated intragroup claims.

The Oi Companies may mutually agree an alternative method for the settlement of intragroup claims, under the originally agreed terms and conditions, including, but not limited to, by netting their payables and receivables, as provided for by the law.

CASH SWEEP

Unsecured Creditors, MEs/EPPs, and Secured Creditors can accelerate the receipt of their claims against the Oi Companies with the cash sweep, which shall be proportionally distributed among the claims, under the following terms:

In the first five (5) years after the Court Ratification of the Plan, the Oi Companies shall assign the equivalent to 100% of the net revenue from the sale of assets that exceeds US$200 million.

Beginning on the 6th year after the Court Ratification of the Plan, the Oi Companies shall assignfile with the equivalentcourt, within 180 days from the decision’s issue date, the draft amendment to 70% of its Cash Balance that exceeds the Minimum Cash Balance.

The Minimum Cash Balance is defined as the higher of:

(i)

25% of the aggregate of prior year’s OPEXJRP; and CAPEX; or

 

 (ii)

R$5 billion.the Trustee organize the New General Creditors’ Meeting, which shall be held within 60 days from the submission of the amendment proposal to the JRP.

Additionally, any funds originating from a capital increase shall be added to the calculation of the Minimum Cash Balance.

CAPITAL INCREASES – NEW FUNDS

Pursuant to the shareholders’ preemptive right and fulfilling or waiving the conditions precedent provided for in the Backstop Agreement or the JRP, the Company was required to make a Capital Increase – New Funds totaling R$4,000,000,000.

The Issue Price of the New II Common Shares was calculated by dividing R$3,000,000,000 by the number of Oi shares outstanding on the business day immediately prior to the capital increase,Accordingly, taking into consideration possible adjustments provided forthat the decision above was issued on March 11, 2020, the Company shall submit the amendment to the JRP to the court by September 8, 2020, with the New GCM expected to occur on November 6, 2020.

The purpose of the amendment proposal to the JRP will be increasing the flexibility of the JRP by creating a more efficient corporate and operating structure, aiming at maximizing the Company’s value to the benefit of all its stakeholders. This initiative is fully aligned with the Strategic Plan, which is being transparently implemented.

Company subsidiaries

The table below shows the equity interests held in the Backstop Agreement.capital of the Company’s subsidiaries:

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

Companies related to the continuing operations

 

Taking into consideration the terms and conditions of the Backstop Agreement, a commitment fee of 8% in US dollars or 10% in Company common shares was due to the investors identified in the Backstop Agreement that committed to promptly provide or obtain firm commitments for the full subscription of the capital increase, as established in said Backstop Agreement. On January 25, 2019, 272,148,705 Common Shares have been issued in a private placement to the Backstop Investors and paid US$13 million to the Backstop Investors as compensation for their commitments under the Commitment Agreement.

FURTHER OBLIGATIONS AND OTHER RELEVANT SITUATIONS:

Restriction to Dividend Payments: The Oi Companies shall be restricted from declaring or paying any dividends, return on capital, or make any other payment or distribution on (or relating to) its own shares (including any payment relating to any merger or consolidation involving any JR Debtors), except as otherwise provided for in the Plan.

The JR Debtors shall only distribute dividends to their shareholders as follows: (i) up to the sixth anniversary of the Court Ratification of Plan, as applicable, the JR Debtors shall not pay any dividends; and (ii) after the sixth anniversary of the Court Ratification of Plan, as applicable, the JR Debtors shall be authorized to pay dividends if, and only if, the Company’s netdebt-to-EBITDA ratio is two (2) or lower, after the end of the relevant financial year.

Suspension of the Obligations: Beginning on the day of a Suspension of Obligations Event and ending on a Reversal Date (as defined below) (“Suspension Period”) with regard to thePre-petition Claims, the following obligations shall no longer apply to thePre-petition Claims to be restructured and paid under the Judicial Reorganization Plan (for purposes of this Clause, “Suspended Obligations”):

Annual early redemption with Surplus Cash Generation;

Restriction to Dividend Payments.

The JR Debtors shall be fully exempt from liabilities resulting from any actions taken or events incurred during the Suspension Period or, also, any contractual obligation prior to a Reversal Date (as if, in this period of time, these actions, events, or contractual obligations were allowed).

At any time, if two (2) credit rating agencies rate Oi with an investment grade and no noncompliance occurs, the obligations listed above shall be suspended (“Obligation Suspension Event”). If on any subsequent date (“Reversal Date”), one (1) or both rating agencies cancel the investment grade or downgrade Oi below the investment grade, the suspended obligations shall be reinstated.

Conditions Precedent.The JRP provides for a set of resolution and suspensory conditions precedent that need to be verified or formally and expressly waived by the qualified unsecured creditors to undertake the Capital Increase – New Funds. As at December 31, 2018, all Conditions Precedent had been verified or waived.

Company

  Core business  Home country  Direct
2019
   Indirect
2019
   Direct
2018
   Indirect
2018
 

Oi Holanda

  Raising funds in the international
market
  The Netherlands   100%      100%   

Portugal Telecom Internacional Finance B.V

  Raising funds in the international
market
  The Netherlands   100%      100%   

CVTEL, BV

  Investment management  The Netherlands   100%      100%   

Carrigans Finance S.à.r.l.

  Investment management  Luxembourg   100%      100%   

Rio Alto Gestão de Créditos e Participações S.A. (“Rio Alto”)

  Receivables portfolio management and
interests in other entities
  Brazil   100%      100%   

Oi Serviços Financeiros S.A. (“Oi Serviços Financeiros”)

  Financial services  Brazil   99.87%    0.13%    99.87%    0.13% 

Bryophyta SP Participações Ltda.

  Property investments  Brazil   99.80%    0.20%    99.80%    0.20% 

Telemar

  Fixed telephony – Region I  Brazil   100%      100%   

Oi Móvel

  Mobile telephony – Regions I, II, and
III
  Brazil     100%      100% 

Paggo Empreendimentos S.A.

  Payment and credit systems  Brazil     100%      100% 

Paggo Acquirer Gestão de Meios de Pagamentos Ltda.

  Payment and credit systems  Brazil     100%      100% 

Paggo Administradora Ltda. (“Paggo Administradora”)

  Payment and credit systems  Brazil     100%      100% 

Serede – Serviços de Rede S.A. (“Serede”)

  Network services  Brazil   17.51%    82.49%    17.51%    82.49% 

Brasil Telecom Comunicação Multimídia Ltda. (“BrT Multimídia”)

  Data traffic  Brazil     100%      100% 

Dommo Empreendimentos Imobiliários Ltda.

  Purchase and sale of real estate  Brazil     100%      100% 

Brasil Telecom Call Center S.A. (“BrT Call Center”)

  Call center and telemarketing services  Brazil     100%      100% 

BrT Card Serviços Financeiros Ltda. (“BrT Card”)

  Financial services  Brazil     100%      100% 

Pointer Networks S.A. (“Pointer”)

  Wi-Fi internet  Brazil     100%      100% 

Pointer Peru S.A.C

  Wi-Fi internet  Peru     100%      100% 

VEX Venezuela C.A

  Wi-Fi internet  Venezuela     100%      100% 

VEX USA Inc.

  Wi-Fi internet  United States of
America
     100%      100% 

VEX Ukraine LLC

  Wi-Fi internet  Ukraine     40%      40% 

PT Participações, SGPS, S.A. (“PT Participações”)

  Management of equity investments  Portugal   100%      100%   

Oi Investimentos Internacionais S.A. (“Oi Investimentos”)

  Business consulting and management
services, preparation of projects and
economic studies, and investment
management
  Portugal     100%      100% 

Africatel GmbH & Co.KG.

  Investment management  Germany     100%      100% 

Africatel GmbH

  Investment management  Germany     100%      100% 

Africatel Holdings, BV

  Investment management  The Netherlands     86%      86% 

TPT—Telecomunicações Publicas de Timor, S.A. (“TPT”)

  Provision of telecommunications,
multimedia and IT services, and
purchase and sale of related products
in Timor
  Portugal     76.14%      76.14% 

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

Companies classified as assets held for sale

 

Sale of Capital Assets. The JRP, in the Appendix to Clause 3.1.3, lists a set of capital assets that Management may sell in order to raise additional funds. The Company’s management has been undertaking efforts to sell some financial investments, having not yet completed any transaction. Therefore none of these assets were classified as held-for-sale as of December 31, 2018.

Corporate Restructuring activities. The JRP, in the Appendix to Clause 7.1., lists a set of corporate transactions that Management may implement to optimize and increase the Company’s results, contributing to the compliance with the JRP obligations. As part of these activities, the merger of Oi Internet with and into Oi Móvel was completed on March 1, 2018.

1.6.

LIABILITIES SUBJECT TO COMPROMISE AND OTHER IMPACTS FROM ASC 852 REORGANIZATIONS (Notes 28 and 29)

As a result of the filing of the Bankruptcy Petitions, the company has applied the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 852Reorganizationsin preparing its consolidated financial statements. ASC 852 requires that financial statements distinguish transactions and events that are directly associated with the reorganization from the ongoing operations of the business. Accordingly, certain expenses, realized gains and losses and provisions for losses that are realized or incurred in the judicial reorganization proceedings have been recorded in a reorganization line item in its consolidated statements of operations as disclosed in note 28. In addition, the prepetition obligations that may be impacted by the judicial reorganization proceedings have been classified on the balance sheet as liabilities subject to compromise as disclosed in note 29. These liabilities are reported as the amounts expected to be allowed by the Judicial Reorganization Court, even if they may be settled for lesser amounts.

Company

  

Core business

  Home country  Direct
2019
   Indirect
2019
   Direct
2018
   Indirect
2018
 

PT Ventures, SGPS, S.A.

  Management of equity interests in the context of international investments  Portugal     86%      86% 

Directel—Listas Telefónicas Internacionais, Lda. (“Directel”)

  Telephone directory publishing and operation of related databases, in international operations  Portugal     86%      86% 

Directel Cabo Verde – Serviços de Comunicação, Lda.

  Telephone directory publishing and operation of related databases in Cape Verde  Cape Verde     51.60%      51.60% 

Kenya Postel Directories, Ltd.

  Production, publishing and distribution of telephone directories and other publications  Kenya     51.60%      51.60% 

Elta—Empresa de Listas Telefónicas de Angola, Lda.

  Telephone directory publishing  Angola     47.30%      47.30% 

Timor Telecom, S.A.

  Telecommunications services concessionaire in Timor  Timor     44%      44% 

CST – Companhia Santomense de Telecomunicações, S.A. R.L.

  Operation of fixed and mobile telecommunication public services in São Tomé and Principe  São Tomé     43.86%      43.86% 

LTM—Listas Telefónicas de Moçambique, Lda.

  Management, publishing, operation and sale of telecommunications subscriber and classified ads directories  Mozambique     43%      43% 

The amounts initially recorded as liabilities subject to compromise were subsequently adjustedequity interests in joint arrangements and reclassified to reflectinterests in associates are measured using the new legal termsequity method and conditions established by the JRP Court and as of December 31, 2018 there are no outstanding liabilities subject to compromise.

On December 31, 2018, the Company did not emerge from bankruptcy, due to certain material unsatisfied conditions, which relates to additional capital increase that occurred on January 25, 2019.

In connection with an emergence from the Judicial Reorganization, under U.S. GAAP the Company would have been required to consider whether it met the criteria requiring adoption of fresh start accounting as of the January 25, 2019, the emergence date. Fresh start accounting would have required the reorganization value of the Company to be assigned to the assets and liabilities of the Company in conformity with the procedures specified in ASC 805-20. However, as the Company intends to file its annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2019 with financial statements prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), it does not intend to adopt fresh start accounting as there is no requirement under IFRS to do so.

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial Reorganization – Debtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

1.7. RECONCILIATION BETWEEN U.S. GAAP AND IFRS

The Company prepares its local financial statements in accordance with IFRS, and the pronouncements, guidelines and interpretations issued by the Accounting Pronouncements Committee (CPC), approved by the Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commission (CVM).

As the Company is not a fist-time adopter of IFRS, it anticipates it will be required to present, in the audited financial statements included in its annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended 12/31/2019, a reconciliation from U.S. GAAP to IFRS for the comparative years presented.

In order to anticipate such requirement, the Company is presenting the reconciliation as of December 31, 2018, as follows:

Accounting differences between U.S. GAAPandIFRS

Company

  

Core business

  Home country  Direct
2019
   Indirect
2019
   Direct
2018
   Indirect
2018
 

 

Companhia AIX de Participações (“AIX”)

  Data traffic  Brazil     50%      50% 
Paggo Soluções e Meios de Pagamento S.A. (“Paggo Soluções”)  Financial company  Brazil     50%      50% 
Gamecorp S.A. (“Gamecorp”)  Pay TV service, except programmers  Brazil     29.90%      29.90% 

Hispamar Satélites S.A. (“Hispamar”)

  Satellite operation  Brazil     19.04%      19.04% 

The financial statements of the Company are prepared in accordance with accounting policies generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). Differences between these accounting policies and practices adopted in International Financial Reporting Standard - IFRS, where applicable to Oi, are summarized below:

Reconciliation

      12/31/2018   

 

 
       Equity   Net income   

 

 

Under U.S.GAAP

     29,199,496    27,393,837   

Impairment of long-lived assets

   (a)    (1,226,125)    (141,418)   

Business combinations prior to January 1, 2009

   (b)    44,981    4,122   

Pension plans and other post-retirement benefits

   (c)    (689,574)    (115,080)   

Capitalization of interest, net of amortization

   (d)    60,928    (1,780)   

Provision for onerous contracts

   (e)    (4,493,895)    (4,493,895)   

Settlement of judicial reorganization

   (f)      (1,331,016)   

Deferred income tax

   (g)      3,300,785   
    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Under IFRS

     22,895,811    24,615,555   
    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(a)Impairment of long-lived assets

In accordance with FASB ASC 360, long-lived assets, such as property, plant, and equipment, and purchased intangibles subject to amortization, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset.

In accordance with IAS 36 Impairment of assets, such as property, plant, and equipment, and purchased intangibles subject to amortization, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset or group of assets may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset or group of assets to the fair value of the asset or group of assets.

Therefore, regarding impairment of long-lived assets there is an accounting difference between U.S. GAAP and IFRS namely the recognition of impairment under IFRS. In 2018, under U.S. GAAP no impairment losses were recognized and under IFRS a provision for impairment losses amounting to R$1,226,125 were recorded in the balance sheet because of the difference on the impairment methodology between the two standards. Net income in 2018, under IFRS, includes provision for impairment amounting to R$291,807 and depreciation and amortization related effects amounting to R$150,389.

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial Reorganization – Debtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

(b)Business combinations prior to January 1, 2009

Under U.S. GAAP, for the acquisitions of interests in Pegasus, Way-TV, Paggo and TNCP (Amazônia) that occurred prior to January 1, 2009, the Company adopted the procedures determined by FASB ASC 805 Business Combinations, resulting in a difference as compared to the Company’s accounting policy in force prior to that date. The accounting method used under U.S. GAAP in business combination transactions is the “purchase method”, which requires that acquirers reasonably determine the fair-value of the identifiable assets and liabilities of acquired companies, individually, to determine goodwill paid.

Since IFRS 3Business Combinations was effective to business combinations for which the acquisition date was on or after January 1, 2009, under IFRS for all business combinations prior that, the Company typically recognized the difference between the purchase price and the historical book value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as goodwill, which was amortized over the estimated period over which the Company expected to benefit from the goodwill. This period was determined based on the reasons attributed by management for the payment of goodwill. A test for impairment is made at least annually or if there is an indication that the unit in which the goodwill was allocated may be impaired.

Therefore, regarding the business combinations prior to January 1, 2009 there is an accounting difference between U.S. GAAP and IFRS namely the computation of goodwill, recognition of intangible assets and amortization of goodwill.

(c)Pension plans and other post-retirement benefits

The Company applies FASB ASC 715 - Retirement Benefits, which requires an employer to recognize the overfunded status or funded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan as an asset or liability in its balance sheet and to recognize changes in that funded status in the year in which the changes occur through other comprehensive income.

The overfunded status of the pension plans is presented as a prepaid asset. Unrecognized net gain or losses are recognized following the “10% corridor approach”. Deferred actuarial gains and losses outside the 10% corridor are amortized over the average remaining service period of active employees or, when all or almost all participants are inactive, over the average remaining life expectancy of those participants.

Under IFRS, if a plan has an overfunded status, which is not expected to generate future benefits, the company does not recognize the funded status, unless in case of express authorization for offsetting with future employer contribution. Remeasurement of gains and losses, including actuarial gains and losses, must be recognized immediately in OCI and are not subsequently recognized (or recycled) into net income.

Therefore, regarding pension plans and other post-retirement benefits there is an accounting difference between U.S. GAAP and IFRS namely: (i) the recognized overfunded status under U.S. GAAP, and (ii) the result from the use of the “10% corridor approach” which is not applicable under IFRS.

(d)Capitalization of interest, net of amortization

Under U.S. GAAP, capitalized interest is added to the individual assets and is amortized over their estimated useful lives. The Company capitalizes only interest expenses to the extent that borrowings do not exceed the balances of construction in-progress, as generally foreign exchange differences are not eligible for being recorded as part of the cost of the asset.

Under IFRS, financial charges on obligations financing assets and construction works in progress are capitalized, including interest expenses and certain foreign exchange differences.

Therefore, regarding capitalization of interest, net of amortization, there is an accounting difference between U.S. GAAP and IFRS namely the impact of capitalization of foreign exchange under IFRS.

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial Reorganization – Debtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

(e)Provision for onerous contracts

Under U.S. GAAP, future losses on firmly committed executory contracts (onerous contracts) typically are not recognized. Losses are recognized only when incurred.

Under IFRSs, an entity is required to recognize and measure the present obligation under an onerous contract as a provision. An onerous contract is one “in which the unavoidable costs of meeting the obligations under the contract exceed the economic benefits expected to be received under it”.

The Company is party to a telecommunications signals transmission capacity supply agreement using submarine cables that connect North America and South America. Since the agreement’s obligations exceed the economic benefits that are expected to be received throughout the agreement and the costs are unavoidable, the Company recognized in 2018, pursuant to IAS 37, an onerous obligation measured at the lowest of net output cost of the agreement brought to present value, in the amount of R$ 4,493,894.

Therefore, regarding provision for onerous contracts there is an accounting difference between U.S. GAAP and IFRS namely the recognition of a provision that does not exist under U.S. GAAP.

(f)Settlement ofJudicial Reorganization

Under U.S. GAAP, the company has applied the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 852 Reorganizations in preparing its consolidated financial statements. Under ASC 852, the company adopted the following accounting procedures:

Prepetition obligations impacted by the judicial reorganization proceedings had been classified on the balance sheet as liabilities subject to compromise in 2017. These liabilities were reported as the amounts expected to be allowed by the Judicial Reorganization Court, even if they were settled for lesser amounts;

Interest accruing on unsecured debt subsequent to the date of petition is not an allowed claim and therefore has not been accrued;

Foreign currency denominated liabilities in Reais using the applicable foreign currency translation rate as of the petition date. As a result there is no foreign currency translation adjustments recorded after the petition date related to prepetition liabilities under U.S. GAAP; and

Under IFRS, there is no specific guidance for accounting Bankruptcy Petitions as there is under U.S. GAAP. Financial liabilities were recorded as before the Bankruptcy Petition, including the accrual of interest based on the contracts, the recognition of foreign currency translation and the recognition of provisions based on expected payment cash outflow (IAS 37 for liability provisions). Liabilities subject to compromise were classified on the balance sheet as Current Liabilities. Any differences between the settlement of the liability and its carrying amount were reorganized upon settlement of the JRP and recorded in the Consolidated Income Statement at such time.

Because all liabilities subject to compromise are already settled in 2018 under the conditions of the JRP, as described in note 29, no GAAP differences compared to IFRS exist for the balances of liabilities after the settlement date.

Therefore, regarding settlement of judicial reorganization the only accounting difference between U.S. GAAP and IFRS are namely: (i) the impacts of settlement and present value of liabilities for adopting ASC 852 under U.S. GAAP that needs to be excluded under IFRS; and (ii) the gain recognition on reversal of interest and foreign currency on loans and financings under IFRS.

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial Reorganization – Debtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

The following is a summary of the Judicial Reorganization adjustments to net income for the year ended December 31, 2018:

Judicial reorganization

12/31/18

Settlement for lesser amounts of prepetition obligations and present value recognition under U.S. GAAP

(6,527,238

Gain on reversal of interest and foreign currency on loans and financings under IFRS

5,196,222

(1,331,016

(g)Deferred income tax

This relates to the impact of recalculation of the deferred tax assets and liabilities considering the adjusted balances of accounts and related impacts on net income and the revised valuation allowance based on the reassessed schedule of expected generation of future taxable income under IFRS.

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The accounting policies detailed below have been consistently applied in all periods presented in these financial statements, including the effects of adopting ASC 852Reorganizations as described in notes 28 and 29 and for the fact that the Company reassessed the assumptions used for certain estimates as described below under “use of estimates”, as present below.

Basis of presentation and goingGoing concern assumption

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared according to United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“U.S. GAAP”), which have been prepared under the assumption that the Company will continue as a going concern.

In August 2014, the FASB issued an accounting standard update that requires management to assess whether there are conditions or events, considered in aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the financial statements are issued. If substantial doubt exists, additional disclosures are required. This update was effective for the Company’s annual periods starting ended December 31, 2016. The Company’s assessment of our ability to continue as a going concern is further discussed below.

The retention of a large amount of funds in court deposits arising from discussions within the regulatory, labor, tax, and civil scope, with immediate impact on the liquidity of Oi Group, as well as with the imposition of high administrative fines, particularly by ANATEL, has contributed to the worsening financial situation in prior years.

Additionally, the change in the standards of consumption of telecommunication services, due to the technological evolution, worsened this scenario of financial difficulties even more. With the mass supply of mobile telephony, cable TV and Internet services, the attractiveness of fixed telephony services have been reduced, resulting in a decrease in the base of subscribers of Oi Group in this segment.

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial Reorganization – Debtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

The financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018,2019, has been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern and in compliance with the legal requirements applicable to a judicial reorganization. The judicial reorganization is aimed at ensuring the continuation of the Oi Companies as going concerns. The likelihood that the Oi Companies will continue as going concerns increasedThis continuity was strengthen with the approval of the JRP by a vast majority of creditors, at the General Creditors’ Meeting held on December 20, 2017, and approval that was ratified by the Judicial Reorganization Court on January 8, 2018. This ratification decision was issued on February 5, 2018 and, as a result, there was the novation of the involved borrowings and financing were novated and the related balances were recalculated pursuant tounder the terms and conditions of the Judicial Reorganization Plan, in accordance with the actions needed for its implementation.

On July 27, 2018, the Company completedJRP, including the Capital Increase with Claim Capitalization through the formalization of the capitalization of part of the Unsecure Claims of the Qualified Bondholders, as provided for by the JRP and approved at the Board of Directors’ meeting held on March 5, 2018. The new shares issued were delivered to Company’s shareholders who exercised their preemptive rights and the holders of the Unsecure Claims of the Qualified Bondholders, through the formalization of the capitalization of their claims.

Finally, on January 25, 2019, the Company completed the capital increase provided for by the JRP through the issue of 3,225,806,451 common shares for an aggregate subscription amount of R$4,000,000. The company believes that it has sufficient funds to continue as a going concern and discharge its obligations in the coming twelve months.Capital Increase with New Funds.

The continuity of the Company as a going concern is ultimately depending on the successful outcome of the judicial reorganization and the realization of other forecasts of the Oi Companies.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

The Company has been successfully discharging the obligations set forth in the judicial reorganization proceedings and so fareven though there have beenare no indications in this regard, we emphasize that these conditions and circumstances are herein described because ofindicate, by their own nature, indicating the existence of uncertaintyuncertainties that may affect the success of the judicial reorganization and that it maypossibly cast doubts as to the Oi Companies’ ability to continue as going concerns. As at December 31, 2019 and after the implementation of the JRP, total shareholders’ equity was R$17,796,506, loss for the year then ended was R$9,095,107, and working capital totaled R$6,157,364. As at December 31, 2018 and after the recognition of the effects of the JRP, total shareholders’ equity was R$22,895,811, profit for the year then ended was R$24,615,555, and working capital totaled R$10,624,025.

UseSince December 2019, a novel strain of estimatescoronavirus (“COVID-19”) has spread throughout the world. On January 31, 2020, the World Health Organization announced that COVID-19 was a global health emergency and on March 3, 2020, the World Health Organization categorized COVID-19 as a pandemic.

In preparingAs of the date of this annual report, the Company has not been able to quantify any material impacts related to COVID-19 and it is too soon to accurately determine the extent of its medium- and long-term impacts on the global and Brazilian economic scenarios. However, as it is not possible yet to predict the duration and effects of this crisis, there is a risk of material impacts on operations and sales, particularly for the fiber-to-the-home network expansion. For more details see note 33 (d).

Additionally the debt instruments with BNDES contain financial covenants that require to the Company to maintain five specified financial ratios, measured on a quarterly basis. Under these debt instruments, BNDES has the right to accelerate the debt if, at the date the financial covenants are tested, the Company is not in compliance with any two of these ratios. At December 31, 2019, the Company was in compliance with these financial covenants.

As a result of the depreciation of the real subsequent to December 31, 2019, partially due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the public health measures adopted to combat the pandemic in Brazil and internationally, and the related effects on our U.S. dollar-denominated indebtedness and interest expenses, the Company believed that it was probable that as of March 31, 2020, the Company would not be in compliance with more than one of these financial ratios. In anticipation of these ratio breaches, on March 30, 2020 the Company obtained a waiver from BNDES. See Notes 3 and 20 for further information.

2.

SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The accounting policies detailed below have been consistently applied in the periods presented in these Consolidated Financial Statements by the Company, as well as its subsidiaries.

(a)

Reporting basis

The financial statements have been prepared based on the historic cost, except for certain financial instruments measured at their fair values, as described in conformity with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles,the accounting policies in item (b) of the accounting policies below.

The preparation of financial statements requires the use of certain critical accounting estimates and the exercise of judgment by the Company’s management uses estimates and assumptions based on historical experience and other factors, including expected future events, which are considered reasonable and relevant. The use of estimates and assumptions frequently requires judgments related to matters that are uncertain with respect toin the outcomes of transactions and the amount of assets and liabilities. Actual results of operations and the financial position may differ from these estimates. Significant items subject to such estimates and assumptions include the useful lives of fixed assets, allowances for doubtful accounts, the valuation of derivatives, the valuation ofavailable-for-sale investment, deferred tax assets, valuation of fixed assets, pension plan, income tax uncertainties and contingencies.

The estimateapplication of the expected amountGroup’s accounting policies. Those areas that involve a higher degree of the allowed claim under contingencies, following ASC 852Reorganizations, is ajudgment or complexity or areas where assumptions and estimates are significant estimate. As the estimation process is inherently uncertain, future actions and decisions by the Judicial Reorganization Court may differ significantly from its own estimate, potentially having material future effects on its financial statements. Furthermore, as of December 31, 2017 these liabilities were reported as the amounts expected to be allowed by the Judicial Reorganization Court, even if they may be settled for lesser amounts. During 2018, these liabilities have been adjusted to their respective settled amounts, resultingare disclosed in significant variation between the settled amount and the expected amount of the allowed claim as described in note 29.item (c) below.

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial Reorganization – Debtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

Change in Accounting Estimates

Allowance for doubtful accounts

The Company review its estimates of allowance for doubtful accounts considering the incurred loss model, including the effects of probable losses on accounts receivable taking into account the measures implemented to restrict the provision of services to and collect late payments from customers.

Consolidated Financial Statements

The accompanyingCompany’s consolidated financial statements includehave been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) , and the accountspronouncements, guidelines and interpretations issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), effective on December 31, 2019, which are the same followed for the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018.

The Company is presenting its financial statements under IFRS for SEC reporting purposes after several years of presenting them under accounting policies generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). The accounting differences between U.S. GAAP and IFRS and the reconciliation of these accounting polices and practices are presented in Note 34.

Management asserts that all relevant information related to the financial statements, which corresponds to the information it uses while managing the Company, has been disclosed in this financial information.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

b)

Significant accounting policies

Consolidation criteria of subsidiaries by the full consolidation method

Full consolidation was prepared in accordance with IFRS 10—Consolidated Financial Statements and incorporates the financial statements of the CompanyCompany’s direct and its subsidiaries, including indirect subsidiaries. The main consolidation procedures are as follows:

the ones under bankruptcybalances of assets, liabilities, income and expenses are consolidated, according to their accounting nature;

intragroup assets and liabilities and material revenue and expenses are eliminated;

investments and related interests in foreign jurisdictions (Oi Holanda and Portugal Telecom International Finance B.V) which were under the Company´s control as of December 31, 2018. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The Company accounts for investments over which it has significant influence but not a controlling financial interest using the equity method of accounting.subsidiaries are eliminated;

non-controlling interests in equity and profit or loss for the year are separately stated; and

exclusive investment funds (Note 8) are consolidated;

The assets and liabilities related to the operations in Africa are consolidated and stated in a single line item of the balance sheet asheld-for-sale assets as a result of Management’s expectation and decision to hold these assets and liabilities for sale. In the statement of operations,profit or loss, however, costs/expenses and revenue/gains are stated under the full consolidation method because these assetsoperations do not meet the criteria to be classified as “discontinued operation”.

The table below shows the equity interests held in the capital of the Company’s subsidiaries:

Companies related to the continuing operations

Company

  

Core business

  

Home country

  Direct
2018
   Indirect
2018
   Direct
2017
   Indirect
2017
 

Oi Holanda

  

Raising funds in the international market

  

The Netherlands

   100     100  

Portugal Telecom International Finance B.V

  

Raising funds in the international market

  

The Netherlands

   100     100  

CVTEL, BV

  

Investment management

  

The Netherlands

   100     100  

Carrigans Finance S.à.r.l.

  

Investment management

  

Luxembourg

   100     100  

Copart 5

  

Property investments

  

Brazil

   100     100  

Rio Alto Gestão de Créditos e Participações S.A. (“Rio Alto”)

  

Receivables portfolio management and interests in other entities

  

Brazil

   100     100  

Oi Serviços Financeiros S.A. (“Oi Serviços Financeiros”)

  

Financial services

  

Brazil

   99.87   0.13   99.87   0.13

Bryophyta SP Participações Ltda.

  

Property investments

  

Brazil

   99.80   0.20   99.80   0.20

Telemar

  

Fixed telephony – Region I

  

Brazil

   100     100  

Oi Móvel

  

Mobile telephony – Regions I, II, and III

  

Brazil

     100     100

Paggo Empreendimentos S.A.

  

Payment and credit systems

  

Brazil

     100     100

Paggo Acquirer Gestão de Meios de Pagamentos Ltda.

  

Payment and credit systems

  

Brazil

     100     100

Paggo Administradora Ltda. (“Paggo Administradora”)

  

Payment and credit systems

  

Brazil

     100     100

Serede – Serviços de Rede S.A. (“Serede”)

  

Network services

  

Brazil

   17.51   82.49   18.57   81.43

Brasil Telecom Comunicação Multimídia Ltda. (“BrT Multimídia”)

  

Data traffic

  

Brazil

     100     100

Copart 4

  

Property investments

  

Brazil

     100     100

Dommo Empreendimentos Imobiliários Ltda.

  

Purchase and sale of real estate

  

Brazil

     100     100

Brasil Telecom Call Center S.A. (“BrT Call Center”)

  

Call center and telemarketing services

  

Brazil

     100     100

BrT Card Serviços Financeiros Ltda. (“BrT Card”)

  

Financial services

  

Brazil

     100     100

Pointer Networks S.A. (“Pointer”)

  

Wi-Fi internet

  

Brazil

     100     100

Pointer Peru S.A.C

  

Wi-Fi internet

  

Peru

     100     100

VEX Venezuela C.A

  

Wi-Fi internet

  

Venezuela

     100     100

VEX USA Inc.

  

Wi-Fi internet

  

United States of America

     100     100

VEX Ukraine LLC

  

Wi-Fi internet

  

Ukraine

     40     40

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial Reorganization – Debtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

‘discontinued operation’, as provided for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

Companies classified as assets held for sale

Company

  

Core business

  

Home
country

  Direct
2018
   Indirect
2018
   Direct
2017
   Indirect
2017
 

PT Participações, SGPS, S.A. (“PT Participações”)

  

Management of equity investments

  

Portugal

   100     100  

Oi Investimentos Internacionais S.A. (“Oi Investimentos”)

  

Business consulting and management services, preparation of projects and economic studies, and investment management

  

Portugal

     100     100

Africatel GmbH & Co.KG.

  

Investment management

  

Germany

     100     100

Africatel GmbH

  

Investment management

  

Germany

     100     100

Africatel Holdings, BV

  

Investment management

  

The Netherlands

     86     86

PT Ventures, SGPS, S.A.

  

Management of equity interests in the context of international investments

  

Portugal

     86     86

Directel - Listas Telefónicas Internacionais, Lda. (“Directel”)

  

Telephone directory publishing and operation of related databases, in international operations

  

Portugal

     86     86

TPT - Telecomunicações Publicas de Timor, S.A. (“TPT”)

  

Provision of telecommunications, multimedia and IT services, and purchase and sale of related products in Timor

  

Portugal

     76.14     76.14

Directel Cabo Verde – Serviços de Comunicação, Lda.

  

Telephone directory publishing and operation of related databases in Cape Verde

  

Cape Verde

     51.60     51.60

Kenya Postel Directories, Ltd.

  

Production, publishing and distribution of telephone directories and other publications

  

Kenya

     51.60     51.60

Elta - Empresa de Listas Telefónicas de Angola, Lda.

  

Telephone directory publishing

  

Angola

     47.30     47.30

Timor Telecom, S.A.

  

Telecommunications services concessionaire in Timor

  

Timor

     44     44

CST – Companhia Santomense de Telecomunicações, S.A.R.L.

  

Operation of fixed and mobile telecommunication public services in Sao Tomé and Principe

  

Sao Tomé

     43.86     43.86

LTM - Listas Telefónicas de Moçambique, Lda.

  

Management, publishing, operation and sale of telecommunications subscriber and classified ads directories

  

Mozambique

     43     43

The equity interests in joint arrangements and interests in associates are measured using the equity method and are as follows:

Company

  

Core business

  Home
country
   Direct
2018
   Indirect
2018
  Direct
2017
   Indirect
2017
 

Companhia AIX de Participações (“AIX”)

  Data traffic   Brazil      50    50

Paggo Soluções e Meios de Pagamento S.A. (“Paggo Soluções”)

  Financial company   Brazil      50    50

Gamecorp S.A. (“Gamecorp”)

  Pay TV service, except programmers   Brazil      29.90    29.90

Hispamar Satélites S.A. (“Hispamar”)

  Satellite operation   Brazil      19.04    19.04

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial Reorganization – Debtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

by IFRS 5.

Functional and presentation currency

The Company and its subsidiaries operate primarilymainly as telecommunications industry operators in Brazil, Africa, and Asia, and engage in activities typical of this industry. The items included in the financial statements of each group company are measured using the currency of the main economic environment of the respective company’s operationswhere it operates (“functional currency”). The individual and consolidated financial statements are presented in Brazilian Reaisreais (R$), which is the Company’s functional and presentation currency.

Transactions and balances

Foreign currency-denominated transactions are translated into the functional currency using the exchange rates prevailing on the transaction dates. Foreign exchange gains and losses arising on the settlement of the transaction and the translation at the exchange rates prevailing at year end,yearend, related foreign currency-denominated monetary assets and liabilities are recognized in the income statement, of profit or loss, except when qualified as hedge accounting and, therefore, deferred in equity as cash flow hedges.

Group companies with a different functional currency

The profit or loss and the financial position of all Group entities, none of which uses a currency from a hyperinflationary economy, whose functional currency is different from the presentation currency are translated into the presentation currency as follows:

 

assets and liabilities are translatedtranslating at the rate prevailing rate at the end of the reporting period;

 

revenue and expenses disclosed in the statement of profit or loss are translated using the average exchange rate;

 

all the resulting foreign exchange differences are recognized as a separate component of equity in other comprehensive income; and

 

goodwill and fair value adjustments, arising from the acquisition of a foreign entity are treated as assets and liabilities of the foreign entity and translated at the closing exchange rate.

At

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

As at December 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, the foreign currency-denominated assets and liabilities were translated into Brazilian Reaisreais using mainly the following foreign exchange rates:

 

  Closing rate   Average rate   Closing rate   Average rate 

Currency

  2018   2017   2016   2018   2017   2016   2019   2018   2019   2018 

Euro

   4.4390    3.9693    3.4384    4.3094    3.6089    3.8543    4.5305    4.4390    4.4159    4.3094 

US dollar

   3.8748    3.3080    3.2591    3.6558    3.1925    3.4833    4.0307    3.8748    3.9461    3.6558 

Cape Verdean escudo

   0.0403    0.0360    0.0313    0.0391    0.0327    0.0352    0.0411    0.0403    0.0401    0.0391 

Sao Tomean dobra

   0.000185    0.000162    0.000140    0.000177    0.000149    0.000160    0.000192    0.000185    0.000188    0.000177 

Kenyan shilling

   0.0381    0.0321    0.0318    0.0361    0.0309    0.0343    0.0398    0.0381    0.0387    0.0361 

Namibian dollar

   0.2698    0.2687    0.2325    0.2764    0.2401    0.2369    0.2878    0.2698    0.2732    0.2764 

Mozambican metical

   0.0627    0.0565    0.0450    0.0601    0.0499    0.0579    0.0631    0.0627    0.0627    0.0601 

Angolan kwanza

   0.0126    0.0200    0.0197    0.0147    0.0193    0.0214    0.0084    0.0126    0.0111    0.0147 

Segment informationreporting

The presentation of information relating toabout operating segments is consistentpresented consistently with the internal reportsreport provided to the chief operating decision makerCompany’s main decision-making body, its Board of Directors. Management monitors and tracks performance of each of the Company, defined byCompany’s services offerings based on the Company asrevenues of those services and the Board of Executive Officers (“Comitê de Gestão”). The results of segment operations are regularly reviewed in orderon a consolidated basis with regard to make decisions about the allocation of resources to be allocated to assess operationaltheir performance and for strategic decision-making.

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial Reorganization – Debtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

decision-making (Note 28).

Business combinations

The Company uses the acquisition method to account for business combinations. The consideration transferred for the acquisition of a subsidiary is the fair value of the assets transferred, the liabilities incurred, and the equity instruments issued. The consideration transferred includes the fair value of assets and liabilities resulting from a contingent consideration contract, where applicable. The identifiable assets acquired and the liabilities and contingent liabilities assumed in a business combination are measured initially measured atas their fair values at the date of acquisition. The Company depreciates amounts recognized based on the appreciation of the acquired assets, according to the useful lives of the underlying assets, and tests such assets to determine any asset impairment losses when there is evidence of impairment. Theimpairment; on the other hand, the Company tests goodwill for impairment amounts based on future profitability (goodwill) on an annual basis. There were no business combinations for the years presented.

Investment Securities

Investment securities at December 31, 2018 and 2017 consist of short-term and long-term investments classified as trading and an investment at Unitel and CVT are classified asavailable-for-sale. Trading andavailable-for-sale securities are recorded at fair value. Unrealized holding gains and losses on trading securities are included in earnings. Unrealized holding gains and losses, net of the related tax effect, onavailable-for-sale securities are excluded from earnings and are reported as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income until realized.

A decline in the market value of anyavailable-for-sale below cost that is deemed to be other-than-temporary results in an impairment to reduce the carrying amount to fair value. To determine whether an impairment is other-than-temporary, the Company considers all available information relevant to the collectability of the security, including past events, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts when developing estimate of cash flows expected to be collected. Evidence considered in this assessment includes the reasons for the impairment, the severity and duration of the impairment, changes in value subsequent toyear-end, forecasted performance of the investee, and the general market condition in the geographic area or industry the investee operates in.

Cash and cash equivalents

This caption includesComprise cash and imprest cash fund, banks, and highly liquid short-term investments (usually maturing within less than three months), immediately convertible into a known cash amount, and subject to an immaterial risk of change in value, which are stated at fair value at the end of the reporting period and which do not exceed their market value, and whose classification is determined as shown below.below (Note 8).

Cash investmentsFinancial assets

Cash investmentsFinancial assets are classified according to their purpose as:into: (i) trading securities;amortized cost; (ii) fair value through other comprehensive income; and (iii) fair value through profit or loss.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

The Company classifies its financial assets into the following measurement categories: (1) assets measured at amortized cost—i.e., financial assets that meet the following conditions: (i) the business model under which financial assets are held to maturity;obtain contractual cash flows; and (iii) available for sale.

Trading security investments(ii) the contractual terms of the financial asset generate, on specified dates, cash flows that are measuredonly payments of principal and interest on the outstanding principal (accounts receivables, loans and cash equivalents). Amortized cost is written down by impairment losses; (2) financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income. Interest income is calculated using the effective interest method, foreign exchange gains and their effectslosses, and impairment are recognized in profit or loss.Held-to-maturity short-term investments are measured at the cost of acquisition plus interest earned, less allowance for impairment losses, where applicable, and their effects Other net earnings (losses) are recognized in profit or loss.Available-for-sale investments are measured at fair value, and their unrealized gains andother comprehensive income. Upon derecognition, accumulated losses are excluded from earnings and reported in other comprehensive income until realized, except when allare reclassified to profit or a portion of the unrealized holding gainloss; and loss of anavailable-for-sale security that is designated as being hedged in a fair value hedge when it shall be recognized in earnings during the period of the hedge. Upon the adoption of ASU 2016-01 on January 1, 2018, all investments in equity securities are carried(3) financial assets at fair value with changesthrough profit or loss. Net earnings (losses), including interest, are recognized directly in fair value recognized in net income.profit or loss.

Accounts receivable

Accounts receivable from telecommunications services provided are stated at the tariff or service amount on the date they are provided and do not differ from their fair values.

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial Reorganization – Debtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

These receivables also include receivables from services provided and not billed by the end of the reporting period and receivables related to handset, SIM cards, and accessories. The loss allowance for doubtful accounts estimatetrade receivables is recognized inmeasured at an amount considered sufficientequal to cover possiblethe life-time expected credit losses on the realization of these receivables. The allowanceas allowed for doubtful accounts estimate is prepared based on historic default rates.

The allowance for doubtful accounts is set up to recognize probable losses on accounts receivable taking into account the measures implemented to restrict the provision of services to and collect late payments from customers.

There are cases of agreements with certain customers to collectpast-due receivables, including agreements that allow customers to settle their debts in installments. The actual amounts not received may be different from the allowance recognized, and additional accruals might be required.by IFRS 9 (Note 9).

Non-current assets held-for-sale and discontinued operationsheld for sale

Long-livedNon-current assets are classified as held-for-sale if itsassets held for sale when their carrying amount is will be recoveredrecoverable, principally through a sale, transaction rather than through continuing use and if meet theywhen such sale is highly probable. These assets are stated at the held-for-sale criteria. For thislower of their carrying amount and their fair value less costs to besell. Any impairment loss on a group of assets held for sale is initially allocated to goodwill and, then, to the case, the disposal must be available for immediate sale in its present condition subject only to terms that are usual and customary for sales of suchremaining assets and its sale mustliabilities on a pro rata basis.

A discontinuing operation is a component of an entity or a business unit that can be probable.clearly distinguished operationally from the rest of the Company. The resultsclassification of discontinued operations are reported in one line item ina discontinuing operation is made when the consolidated statements of income for current and prior periods, commencing in the period in which the businessoperation is sold or meets the criteria of a discontinued operation, including any gain or loss recognizedto be classified as adjustment of the carrying amount to fair value less cost to sell.held for sale (Note 31).

Property, plant and equipment

Property, and equipment consists of transmission equipment, trunking and switching stations, metallic and fiber-optic cable networks and lines, underground ducts, posts and towers, data communication equipment, network systems and infrastructure and motor-generator groups.

Property, plant and equipment isare stated at cost of purchase or construction, less accumulated depreciation. Historical costs include expenses directly attributable to the acquisition of assets. They also include certain costs foron facilities, when it is probable that the future economic benefits related to such costs will flow tointo the Company.Company, and asset dismantlement, removal and restoration costs. The borrowings and financing costs directly attributable to the purchase, construction or production of a qualifying asset are capitalized in the initial cost of such asset. Qualifying assets are those that necessarily require a significant time to be ready for use.

CostsSubsequent costs are added to the carrying amount as appropriate, when, and only when, these assets generate future economic benefits and can be reliably measured. The residual balance of major replacementsthe replaced asset is derecognized. Maintenance and improvementsrepair costs are capitalized. Repairrecorded in profit or loss for the period when they are incurred, and maintenance expenditures that do not enhancethey are capitalized when, and only when, they clearly represent an increase in installed capacity or extend the asset’s useful lifelives of assets.

Assets under finance leases are charged to operating expenses as incurred.recorded in property, plant and equipment at the lower of fair value or the present value of the minimum lease payments, from the initial date of the agreement.

Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line basis, based on the estimated useful lives of the assets. Theassets, which are annually reviewed by the Company reviews the useful lives annually.(Note 16).

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

Intangible assets

Acquired intangible assets with finite useful lives are recognized at cost, less amortization and accumulated impairment losses. Amortization is recognized on a straight-line basis over the asset’s estimated useful life. The estimated useful life and method of amortization are reviewed at the end of each annual reporting period, and the effect of any changes in estimates is accounted for on a prospective basis. Intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are carried at cost less accumulated impairment losses.

Software licenses purchased are capitalized based on the costs incurred to purchase the software and make it ready for use.

Software maintenance costs are expensed as incurred.

Regulatory licenses acquired in a business combinationrelated to the merged capital gains are amortized over the STFC concession period. The other regulatory licenses for the operation of the mobile telephony services are recognized at cost of acquisition and amortized over the effective period of each licenses.the related licenses (Note 17).

Long-lived assetsImpairment of non-financial asset

Long-lived assets include assets that do not have indefinite lives, such as property, plant, and equipment, and purchased intangible assets subject to amortization. TheyAssets are reviewedtested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that thetheir carrying amount of an asset may notamounts might be recoverable. Ifimpaired. Impairment losses, if any, indicators of impairment are present, it is performed a test for recoverability. The carrying value of a long-lived asset or asset group is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated from the use and eventual disposition of the asset or asset group. If the undiscounted cash flows do not exceed the asset or asset group’s carrying amount, then an impairment loss is recorded, measured asrecognized in the amount by which the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its recoverable value. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset. In determining fair value less costs to sell, an appropriate valuation model is used.

For impairment test purposes, assets are grouped into the smallest identifiable group for which there is a cash-generating unit (CGU), which is identified pursuant to the operating segment (Note 28).

For assets excluding goodwill, an assessment is made at each reporting date as to whether there is any indication that previously recognized impairment losses may no longer exist or may have decreased. If such indication exists, the Company makes an estimate of recoverable amount. A previously recognized impairment loss is reversed only if there has been a change in the estimates used to determine the asset’s recoverable amount since the last impairment loss was recognized. If that is the case, the carrying amount of the asset is increased to its recoverable amount.

That increased amount cannot exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined, net of depreciation, had no impairment loss been recognized for the asset in prior years. Such reversal is recognized in profit or loss. The following criteria are also applied in assessing impairment of specific assets.

These calculations required the use of judgments and assumptions that may be influenced by different external and internal factors, such as economic trends, industry trends and interest rates, changes in business strategies, and changes in the type of services and products provided by the Company to the market. The use of different assumptions can significantly change the financial information.

In July 2019, the Company disclosed its Strategic Plan, focused on improving operating and financial performance, using a sustainable business model that aims at maximizing the Company’s value in the context of judicial reorganization.

Based on the Strategic Plan, the Company conducted an impairment test of its long-lived assets and identified an impairment loss of R$2,111 million driven basically by the following: (i) revision of said plan; and (ii) increased market competitiveness, mainly in the residential market, intensifying the drop in the revenues from fixed telephony and DTH services.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

The Company used the cash flow forecasts described in the Strategic Plan. These forecasts cover aten-year period and take into consideration the average useful lives of the assets, the cash flow period of the judicial reorganization plan, and are consistent with previous years. The discount rate used in the cash flows corresponds to the weighted average cost of capital of 10.94% (11.55% in 2018), which is reviewed at least annually by the Company.

Pursuant to IAS 36, an impairment loss is to be allocated to write down the carrying amount of the cash generating unit’s assets, which is allocated to the regulatory licenses (Notes 5 and 17).

Adjustment to present value

The Company measures its financial assets and financial liabilities to identify instances of applicability of the discount to present value which represents one of the appropriate method to calculate the fair value for some assets and liabilities transactions. For recognition purposes, the measurement of an asset/liability to present value is calculated taking into consideration the contractual cash flows and stated interest rates, and the interest rate of liabilities in certain cases.

Generally, when applicable, the discount rate used is the average return rate on investments for financial assets or interest charged on Company borrowings for financial liabilities. The balancing item is the asset or asset group exceeds itsliability that has originated the financial instrument, when applicable, and the deemed borrowing costs are allocated to the Company’s profits over the transaction term.

Under the terms and conditions of the JRP, certain balances of debt, trade payables and contingencies involving ANATEL (Note 18) were adjusted to fair value on the date of the novation of prepetition liabilities, pursuant to the requirements of IFRS 9, equivalent to the present value at the time, calculated based on an internal valuation that took into consideration the cash flows of these liabilities and assumptions related to the discount rates, consistent with the maturity and currency of each financial liability.

The present value of the lease agreements is measured by discounting fixed future payment flows, which do not take into account projected inflation, using the incremental interest rate, according to market conditions, and is estimated using the Company-specific risk spread.

Additionally, assets acquired under lease agreements, as well as unrecognized revenue generated by the assignment of communication towers are adjusted to present value.

Provision for contingenciesImpairment of financial assets

Liabilities for loss contingencies arising from claims, assessment, litigation, fines and penalties are recordedFor financial assets measured at amortized cost, the Company assesses whether there is objective evidence that a financial asset or a group of financial assets is impaired. A financial asset or group of financial assets is considered impaired when a present obligationthere is objective evidence, as a result of pastone or more events exists, itthat occurred after the initial recognition of the asset, and that loss event had an impact on the estimated future cash flows of that asset that can be estimated reliably.

In the case of equity investments classified as available for sale, a significant or prolonged decline in their fair value below cost is probablealso objective evidence of impairment.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

Borrowings and financing

Borrowings and financing are stated at amortized cost, plus monetary correction or foreign exchange differences and interest incurred through the end of the reporting period (Note 20).

On the restructuring/novation date of financial liabilities subject to judicial reorganization, the Company recognized loan borrowing and financing commitments at fair value pursuant to the requirements of IFRS 9. The fair value at the restructuring date of each financial liability was calculated based on an internal valuation that took into consideration the cash flows from these liabilities and assumptions related to the discount rates, consistent with the maturity and the currency of each financial liability.

Transaction costs incurred are measured at amortized cost and recognized in liabilities, as a loss will occurreduction to the balance of borrowings and financing, and are expensed over the relevant agreement term.

Leases

The Company recognizes aright-to-use asset and a reliablelease liability in its balance sheet with respect to the leased assets. Theright-to-use asset is measured at cost, which consists of the initial amount of the lease liability measurement, plus initial direct costs incurred, estimated costs to decommission and remove the asset at the end of the lease, other payments made before the lease commencement date, and calculated at present value, discounted by the incremental lending rate. The discount rates used by the Company were obtained in accordance with market conditions, estimated using the Company-specific risk spread.

Financial liabilities and equity instruments

Debt or equity instruments issued the Company and its subsidiaries are classified as financial liabilities or equity instruments, according to the contractual substance of the transaction.

Provisions

The amount recognized as provision is the best estimate of the disbursement required to settle the present obligation can be made. These liabilities do not include estimatesat the end of legal fees and other directly related costs to be incurred, and it takes into considerationthe reporting period, based on the opinion of the management and itsin-house and outside legal counsel, and the amounts are recognized based on the cost of the expected outcome of ongoing lawsuits (Note 24).

For measuring the amount of the provisions to be recognized, the Company basically adopts two methodologies: (i) the statistical measurement model and (ii) the individual measurement model. In order to choose the methodology to be used, the Company takes into consideration, among other criteria, the number of lawsuits, the lawsuit amount, the estimated amount of a possible payment, and the nature of the lawsuit.

The statistical measurement model is usually used in situations where there are (i) a significant volume of administrative or judicial proceedings with similar nature; (ii) individually the proceedings have a low amounts; and (iii) it is possible to determine a statistical model based on historic information about the rates of unfavorable sentences, the amount of the payments, and the changes in the number of proceedings. Usually in this model the Company uses the calculation of the expected amount, as prescribed by paragraph 39 of IAS 37, and requests opinions from outside specialists to assess the likelihood of a loss. The main contingencies measured under this model are labor and civil (PEX and small claims) lawsuits.

PensionThe individual measurement model is usually used in situations where (i) the proceeding involves a high amount; (ii) it is reasonably possible to make an individual assessment of likelihood that a disbursement will be required; and other postretirement plans(iii) there is no similarity in the nature of the proceedings. In this model the Company uses opinions from outside specialists in the involved areas to assess the likelihood of a loss. The main contingencies measured under this model are tax and strategic civil proceedings.

The increase in the obligation as a result of the passage of time is recognized as financial expenses.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

Onerous obligation

The Company recognizes a present obligation when events render the contracting of services onerous.

A contract becomes onerous when: (i) the obligations under the contract exceed the economic benefits expected to be received over the contract period; and its subsidiaries have defined benefit and defined contribution plans. (ii) the costs are unavoidable.

The Company also sponsors a defined benefit health care plan for retireesmeasures the onerous obligation according to the lower net cost of fulfilling the contract, which is determined based on the lower of: (i) the cost of fulfilling the contract or (ii) the cost of any compensation or penalties derived from the noncompliance of the contract.

The base assumptions used to calculate the onerous obligation must be periodically reviewed and employees.measured whenever there are significant changes of these assumptions.

PrivateEmployee benefits

Pension plans: private pension plans and other postretirement benefits sponsored by the Company and its subsidiaries for the benefit of their employees are managed by two foundations. Contributions are determined based on actuarial calculations, when applicable, and charged to profit or loss on the accrual basis (Note 27).

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial Reorganization – Debtor-in-PossessionThe Company and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017its subsidiaries have defined benefit and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

defined contribution plans.

In the defined contribution plan, the sponsor makes fixed contributions to a fund managed by a separate entity. The contributions are recognized as employee benefit expenses as incurred. The sponsor does not have the legal or constructive obligation of making additional contributions, in the event the fund lacks sufficient assets to pay all employees the benefits related to the services provided in the current year and prior years.

ForThe defined benefit is annually calculated by independent actuaries, who use the projected unit credit method. The present value of the defined benefit is determined by discounting the estimated future cash outflows, using the projected inflation rate plus long-term interest. The obligation recognized in the balance sheet as regards the defined benefit pension plans presenting a deficit, corresponds to the present value of the benefits defined at the balance sheet date, less the fair value of the plan’s assets.

The actuarial gains and losses resulting from the changes in the actuarial valuations of the pension plans, whose actuarial obligations or actuarial assets are recorded by the Company, records annual amounts relating to its pension and postretirement plans based on calculations that incorporate various actuarial and other assumptions, including discount rates, mortality, assumed rates of return, compensation increases, turnover rates and healthcare cost trend rates. The Company reviews its assumptions on an annual basis and makes modifications to the assumptions based on current rates and trends when it is appropriate to do so. The effect of modifications to those assumptions is recordedare fully recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income, and amortized to net periodic cost over future periods using the corridor method. The Company believes that the assumptions utilized in recording its obligations under its plans are reasonable based on its experience and market conditions.equity (Note 26).

The Company recognizes the over or under-funded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan as an asset or liabilityrecognized in its balance sheet and recognizes changescorresponds to the present value of available economic benefits, consisting of refunds or reductions in that funded status in the year in which the changes occur through other comprehensive income.

The Company is not required to record actuarial calculations for multi-employer pension plans such as thePBS-A andfuture contributions to such plans are recordedthe plan.

Employee profit sharing: the provision for the employee profit sharing plan is accounted on an accrual basis. Refunds from these plans are recorded only uponbasis, which is paid by April of the cash receipt.year following the recognition of the provision, takes into consideration a set of operating and financial goals approved with the employees’ labor union, under a specific collective labor agreement. This cost is recognized annually in personnel expenses.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

Revenue recognition

Effective January 1, 2018 the Company adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”)2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)”, (“Topic 606”) using the “modified retrospective” method, meaning the standard is applied only to the most current period presented in the financial statements.

Revenues correspond basically to the amount of the payments received or receivable from sales of services in the regular course of the Company’s and its subsidiaries’ activities.

Service revenueRevenue is recognized to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.

The Company applied the judgments that significantly affect the determined amount and the recognition timing of the revenue from a contract with a customer, taking into account the five-step recognition model: (i) identify the contract; (ii) identify the separate performance obligations in the contract; (iii) determine the transaction price; (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations; and (v) recognition da revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation.

Residential Services are composed, basically, of local and long-distance fixed-line voice services, are provided.broadband services and Pay-TV. Local and long distance calls are charged based on time measurement according to the legislation in effect. TheBoth of the services charged based on monthly fixed amounts are calculated and recorded on a straight-line basis. Prepaidrecognized as revenue when the services are provided.

Personal Mobility Services are composed of mobile telephony services, interconnection and handsets, SIM cards and other accessories. Post-paid plan is recognized as revenue when service is provided. Prepaid service is first recognized as unearned revenues and recognition occurs by customer’s usage. Interconnection service is provided upon request of any other telecommunication collective service provider and are charged according to the General Rules on Interconnection (Regulamento Geral de Interconexão), established by ANATEL, and recognized inas revenue as services are used by customers.

Revenue from saleswhen the service is provided. Sales of handsets and accessories isare recognized when these items are delivered and accepted by the customers. Discounts on

SMEs/Corporate Services are composed, basically, of fixed-line and mobile voice, data telecommunications services, providedbroadband services and sales of cell phonesPay-TV services, recognized as revenue when the services are provided.

Products and accessoriesservices are taken into consideration in the recognition of the related revenue.sold separately or bundled packages. Revenues involving transactions with multiple elements are identified in relation torecognized when each one of their componentsperformance obligation is identified and the recognitionapplicable criteria is applied.

Initial installation rates are applied on an individual basis. Revenue is not separately identifiable performance obligations and are recognized when there is significant uncertainty as to its realization.

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial Reorganization – Debtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notesin the revenue pursuant to the Financial Statementsperiod the services are used by the customers.

forRevenue arising from the receipt of trade receivables that had already been written off as losses but were subsequently recovered and received in the collection process, are recognized in profit or loss, in line item ‘Other operating income’.

Variable consideration is estimated at contract inception and constrained to revenue recognition until it is highly probable that a significant revenue reversal will not occur (Notes 4 and 5).

Expense recognition

Expenses are recognized on the accrual basis, considering their relation with revenue realization. Prepaid expenses attributable to future years ended December 31, 2018, 2017are deferred over the related periods. The incremental costs to obtain a contract with a customer (contract compliance costs), consisting basically of sales commissions, are recognized in profit or loss on a systematic basis, consistent with the transfer of goods and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

services to the customers (Note 13).

Financial income and expenses

Financial income is recognized on an accrual basis and comprises interest on receivables settled after the due date, gains on short-term investments and gains on derivative instruments. Financial expenses representconsist primarily of interest effectively incurred, adjustments to present value, and other charges on borrowings, financing, and financial derivative contracts, and other financial transactions.contracts. They also include banking fees and costs, financial intermediation costs on the collection of trade receivables, and other financial transactions.

Income taxes

Income taxes are recorded under the assettransactions (Notes 5 and liability method. Deferred taxes assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their tax basis and for tax loss carryforwards. Deferred tax asset is reduced by a valuation allowance if, based on the weight of evidence available, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. The Company recognizes the effect of income tax positions only if those positions are more likely than not of being sustained. Recognized income tax positions are measured at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon settlement. Changes in recognition or measurement are reflected in the period in which the change in judgment occurs.6).

The company and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in all jurisdictions in which they do business (Brazil is the only major tax jurisdiction). In Brazil, income tax returns are subject to review and adjustment by the tax authorities during a period of five calendar years. Positions challenged by the taxing authorities may be settled or appealed by the company. In Brazil, all audit periods prior to 2013 are closed for federal examination purposes.

As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company has no unrecognized tax benefits, nor any interest and penalties thereon.    Interest and penalties on an underpayment of income taxes are recognized as part of interest expense and other expenses, respectively.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements Adopted in 2018

On January 1, 2018, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”)2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“Topic 606”), using the “modified retrospective” method, meaning the standard is applied only to the most current period presented in the financial statements.

ASC 606 establishes a new five-step model that to account for revenue from contracts with costumers. Pursuant to ASC 606, revenue is recognized in an amount that reflects the consideration that an entity expects to be entitled to in exchange from the transfer of goods or services to a customer.

The new revenue standard supersedes all the revenue recognition requirements in effect until December 31, 2017 pursuant to U.S. GAAP.

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

Management determinedCurrent and deferred income tax and social contribution

Income tax and social contribution are recorded on an accrual basis. Taxes attributed to temporary differences and tax loss carryforwards are recorded in assets or liabilities, as applicable, only under the following impacts from adopting the new standard on January 1, 2018:

Salesassumption of handheld devices at a discount

future realization or payment. The Company offers its customers, who have acquired a given service package or entered into certain mobility contracts, handheld devices at a discount. Sinceprepares technical studies that consider the equipment (cellphone) is not a key condition forfuture generation of taxable income, based on management expectations, considering the provisioncontinuity of the service and there is no customization by the Company to offer the service using a given device, the Company considers such sale a separate performance obligation. Pursuant to ASC 606, the discount should be allocated to the performance obligations arising on the sale of plans and in a mobility contract and the revenue from the sale of handheld devices should increase due to the recognition of the revenue from the sale of cellphones at the time the control over the good is transferred to the customer, while the service revenue should be reduced throughout the transfer of the promised service. The total revenue earned throughout the entire service agreement will not change and there will be no change either in the revenue process from customers and the Company’s cash flows.

companies as going concerns. The Company did not identify the significant financial impact on the sale of cellphones at a discount because the discounts amount is immaterial compared to the Company’s revenue as a whole.

Revenue from registration/service installation fees

The registration/installation fee collected from customers at the time a contract is nonrefundable and refers to the activity the Company is required to undertake when entering into a contract or a comparable activity required to fulfill such contract, while such activity does not entail the transfer of a good or the service promised to the customer. The fee is an advance payment for future goods or services and, therefore, should be recognized as revenue when such goods or services are supplied. For purposes of complying with ASC 606, considering that such fees are a separate performance obligation, revenue must be recognized together with the revenue of said service provision, i.e., it should be deferred and recognized in profit or loss throughout the contract period.

As at January 1, 2018, the Company and its subsidiaries recognized a contractual liability as a contra entry to accumulated losses, which generated the deferral of the revenue from registration/installation fee according to contract duration (12 months), amounting to R$138 million, net of taxes.

Recognition of costs incurred on the performance of a contract

The Company must recognize as an asset the incremental costs incurred to obtain a contract with a customer that are expected to be recovered, and must recognize an impairment loss in profit or loss aswrites down the carrying amount of deferred tax assets to the recognized assets exceedsextent it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable income will be available to allow the remaining amountutilization of all or part of the considerationdeferred tax assets.

Any write-down of deferred tax assets is reversed when it is probable that sufficient taxable income will be available. The technical studies are updated annually, approved by the Board of Directors and reviewed by the Supervisory Board, and the tax credits are adjusted based on the results of these reviews. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the tax rates applicable for the period in which the liability is expected to be settled or the asset is expected to be realized, based on the tax rates set forth in the tax law prevailing at the end of each reporting period, or when new legislation has been substantially enacted. The measurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities reflects the tax consequences that would follow from the manner in which the Company expects, at the end of each reporting period, to receive in exchange forrecover or settle the goodscarrying amount of these assets and services to which the asset refers. The Company must recognize in assets certain costs, substantially commissions on sales, whichliabilities (Note 7).

Earnings per share

Basic earnings per share are currently recognized directly incalculated through profit or loss and recognize them on a systematic basis, consistent withfor the transferyear attributable to the owners of the goodsCompany, divided by the weighted average number of common and preferred shares outstanding in the year. Diluted earnings per share are calculated using said weighted average number of outstanding shares adjusted by potentially dilutive instruments convertible into shares in the reporting years, pursuant to IAS 33. (Note 26 (f).)

(c)

Estimates and critical accounting judgments

The Company’s management uses estimates and assumptions based on historical experience and other factors, including expected future events, which are considered reasonable and relevant, and also requires judgments related to these matters. Actual results of operations and the financial position may differ from these estimates. The estimates that represent a significant risk of causing material adjustments to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities are as follows:

Revenue recognition and accounts receivables

The Company’s revenue recognition policy is significant as it is a material component of operating results. Determining the amount and the timing of revenue recognition by Management, collection ability, and the rights to receive certain network usage revenue is based on judgment related to the nature of the tariff collected for the services provided, the price of certain products, and the right to collect this revenue. If changes in conditions cause management to conclude that such criteria are not met in certain operations, the amount of trade receivables might be affected. In addition, the Company depends on guidelines to measure certain revenue set by ANATEL (Brazilian telecommunications industry regulator).

Expected credit losses on trade receivables

The expected credit losses on trade receivables are determined to recognize probable losses on accounts receivable taking into account the measures implemented to restrict the provision of services to whichand collect late payments from defaulting customers. The estimate of expected credit loss on trade receivables is recognized in an amount considered sufficient to cover possible losses on the asset refersrealization of these receivables and is prepared based on historical default rates and projections of future conditions that impact collections.

There are cases of agreements with certain customers to collectpast-due receivables, including agreements that allow customers to settle their debts in installments. The actual amounts not received may be different from the customer.allowance recognized, and additional accruals might be required.

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

As at January 1, 2018,Depreciation and amortization of assets with finite useful lives

Property, plant and equipment items and intangible assets with finite useful lives are depreciated and amortized, respectively, on a straight-line basis, over the useful lives of the related asset. The depreciation and amortization rates of the most significant assets are shown in Notes 16 and 17, respectively.

The useful lives of certain assets may vary as they are used in the fixed-line or mobile telephony segments. The Company reviews the useful lives of assets annually.

Impairment of long-lived assets

The recoverable amounts of long-lived assets are determined by comparing the calculations of their value in use and their sales prices. These calculations required the use of judgments and assumptions that may be influenced by different external and internal factors, such as economic trends, industry trends and interest rates, changes in business strategies, and changes in the type of services and products sold by the Company and its subsidiaries recognized a contractual asset as a contra entry to accumulated losses, which generated the deferralmarket. The use of different assumptions may significantly change our financial statements.

For impairment assessment purposes of the costs incurred overCash-generating Unit (CGU), the performance contract that wereCompany defined the value in use of its assets.

In measuring the value in use, the Company based its cash flow projections according to the aforementioned Strategic Plan, approved by Management and already disclosed to the market in a material fact notice. These forecasts cover aten-year period, taking into account the useful lives of the assets and are consistent with prior years’ cash flows. The discount rate used on the cash flows corresponds to a weighted average cost of capital of 10.94% (11.55% in 2018), which is reviewed by the Company at least annually.

Pursuant to IAS 36, an impairment loss is allocated to reduce the carrying amount of the assets of a cash-generating unit, firstly to reduce the carrying amount of any goodwill based on expected future profitability and, subsequently, the other assets of the cash-generating unit proportionately to the carrying amount of asset of the cash-generating units. The impairment loss was fully allocated to the carrying value of regulatory licenses (Notes 5 and 17).

Leases

The assumptions related to the appropriated discount rates used in the fair value calculation of the present value of the lease payments are subject to significant fluctuations due to different external and internal factors, including economic trends and the Company’s financial performance. The use of different assumptions to measure the present value of our leases may have a material impact on the estimated present value of theright-of-use asset and the lease liability in the balance sheet.

Fair value of financial liabilities

The assumptions on the discount rates used in the fair value calculation of our financial liabilities are subject to significant fluctuations due to different external and internal factors, including economic trends and the Company’s financial performance. The use of different assumptions to measure the fair value of the financial liabilities can have a material impact on the estimated fair value of these financial liabilities and the amounts recognized as borrowings and financing in the balance sheet, as well as the amounts recognized in profit or lossloss.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

Provisions

Pursuant IAS 37, the Company recognized provisions for contingencies basically originated at the juridical and administrative levels, with labor, tax, and civil nature, as detailed in Note 24.

Depending on the nature of the contingency, the Company’s management uses the statistical measurement or the individual measurement methodology to calculate provisions for contingencies. In any of these methodologies, the Company uses a set of assumptions, information, an internal and external risk assessment, and statistical models that management considers to be appropriate, including the successful implementation of the Judicial Reorganization Plan; however, it is possible that these change in the future, which could result in change in the future provisions for losses.

Deferred income tax and social contribution

The Company recognizes and settles taxes on income based on the transferresults of operations determined in accordance with the Brazilian corporate law, taking into consideration the provisions of the goodstax law, which are materially different from the amounts calculated for IFRS purposes. Pursuant to IAS 12, the Company recognizes deferred tax assets and services to each customer (churn), amounting to R$793 million, netliabilities based on the differences between the carrying amounts and the taxable bases of taxes.the assets and liabilities.

The Company adopted ASC 606, taking into accountregularly tests deferred tax assets for impairment and recognizes an allowance for impairment losses when it is probable that these assets may not be realized, based on the modified retrospective application permitted byhistory of taxable income, the respective standards. Accordingly, we present belowprojection of future taxable income, and the consolidated resultstime estimated for the years ended December 31, 2018, lessreversal of existing temporary differences. These calculations require the effects recognizeduse of estimates and assumptions. The use of different estimates and assumptions could result in the recognition of an allowance for impairment losses for the entire or a significant portion of the deferred tax assets.

Employee benefits

The actuarial valuation is based on assumptions and estimates related to interest rates, return on investments, inflation rates for future periods, mortality indices, and an employment level projection related the pension fund benefit liabilities. The accuracy of these assumptions and estimates will determine the creation of sufficient reserves for the costs of accumulated pensions and healthcare plans, and the amount to be disbursed annually on pension benefits.

These assumptions and estimates are subject to significant fluctuations due to different internal and external factors, such as a resulteconomic trends, social indicators, and our capacity to create new jobs and retain our employees. All assumptions are reviewed at the end of this application, compared with December 31, 2017.the reporting period. If these assumptions and estimates are not accurate, there may be the need to revise the reserves for pension benefits, which could significantly impact Company results.

 

   12/31/2018
(with ASC 606)
   ASU ASC 606
adjustments
   12/31/2018
(w/o ASC 606)
   12/31/2017 

Net operating revenue

   22,060,014    15,588    22,075,602    23,789,654 

Cost of sales and/or services

   (15,822,732     (15,822,732   (15,676,216

Gross profit

   6,237,282    15,588    6,252,870    8,113,438 

Operating income (expenses)

        

Selling expenses

   (4,478,352   (119,214   (4,597,566   (4,399,936

General and administrative expenses

   (2,697,865     (2,697,865   (3,064,252

Other operating income (expenses), net

   417,159      417,159    (1,043,922

Reorganization items, net

   31,580,541      31,580,541    (2,371,918

Income (loss) before financial and taxes

   31,058,765    (103,626   30,955,139    (2,766,590

Financial expenses, net

   (4,012,067     (4,012,067   (1,612,058

Income (loss) before income taxes

   27,046,698    (103,626   26,943,072    (4,378,648

Income tax (current and deferred)

   347,139    35,233    382,372    350,987 

Net income (loss) for the year

   27,393,837    (68,393   27,325,444    (4,027,661
(d)

New and revised standards and interpretations

Recognition

(d.1)

New standards adopted as at January 1, 2019

New and revised standards

Effective beginning on or after:

Annual improvements to IFRSs2015-2017 CycleJanuary 1, 2019
IFRS 16LeasesJanuary 1, 2019
IFRIC 23Uncertainty over Income Tax TreatmentsJanuary 1, 2019
Amendment to IAS 19Change, reduction, or settlement of defined benefit plansJanuary 1, 2019
Amendment to IFRS 9Prepayment Features with Negative CompensationJanuary 1, 2019
Amendment to IAS 28Long-term Interests in Associates and Joint VenturesJanuary 1, 2019

Among the standards, changes, and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities - In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU2016-01, Financial Instruments (Topic 825) which makes targeted improvementsinterpretations referred to the accounting for, and presentation and disclosure of, financial instruments, except those accounts for under the equity method or those that result in consolidation. ASC 825 requires that most equity investments be measured at fair value, with subsequent changes in fair value recognized in net income. ASC 825 does not affect the accounting for investments that would otherwise be consolidated or accounted for under the equity method. The new standard also impacts financial liabilities under the fair value option and the presentation and disclosure requirements for financial instruments. The provisions of ASU 2016-01 are effective forabove, on IFRS 16 had an impact on the Company for annual periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company adopted this standard effectiveand subsidiaries’ financial position as from January 1, 2018, as detailed below.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possessionand it did not have a material impact.Subsidiaries

New Accounting Standards

Leases - In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU2016-02, which supersedes FASB ASC Topic 842, Leases, and makes other conforming amendments to U.S. GAAP. ASU2016-02 requires, among other changesNotes to the lease accounting guidance, lessees to recognize most leaseson-balance sheet via a rightConsolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of use asset and lease liability, and additional qualitative and quantitative disclosures. ASU2016-02 is effectiveBrazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

IFRS 16—Leases

IFRS 16—Leases establishes the principles for the Companyrecognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosures, and requires that lessees account for annual periodsall the leases under a single model in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, permits early adoption,the balance sheet. The standard includes two recognition exemptions for lessees: leases of low value assets (for example, personal computers) and mandatesshort-term leases (i.e., with a modified retrospective transition method.

lease tem of twelve months or less). At the lease commencement date, the lessee shall recognizerecognizes a liability related to the lease payments (i.e., a lease liability) and a lease asset that represents the right to use the underlying asset during the lease term (i.e., aright-of-use asset). The lessees are required to separately recognize an interest expense on the ceaselease liability and a depreciation expense on theright-of-use asset.

There is no significant The lessees shall also revalue the lease liability should certain events occur (for example, any change in the lessor’s recognition based on ASC 842 regardinglease term, a change in the current accounting. The lessors shall continuefuture lease payments as a result of a change in the index or rate used to classify all leases pursuantdetermine such payments). As a rule, the lessee recognizes the revised amount of the lease liability as an adjustment to the same classification principle, differentiating between two types of leases: operating and finance leases.right-of-use asset.

ASC 842 also requires that both lessees and lessors make disclosures more comprehensive than the previous standard.

ASC 842 is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2019. The lessee can elect to adopt the standard using the full retrospective approach or a modified retrospective approach. The standard’s transition provisions allow certain exemptions.

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial Reorganization – Debtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

During the year ended 2018, the Company and its subsidiaries assessed the potential impacts on its financial statements arising from the first-time adoption of ASC 842. This valuation was segregated into different stages, such as:

i)

Inventory-taking of lease agreements;

ii)

Transition approach;

iii)

Measurement of the opening liability and the opening asset;

iv)

Valuation of the discount rate and estimated term;

v)

Impacts on first-time adoption.

Transition

The Company plans to adopt ASC 842adopted IFRS 16 pursuant to the modified retrospective approach (i.e., beginning January 1, 2019, taking into account theright-of-use equal to the leselease liability upon the first-time adoption), and reflected a cumulative effect adjustment in the first quarterwithout any restatement of 2019, rather than restating any prior periods.comparative information. The Company will electelected to apply the standard to agreements that were identified as leases pursuant to the previous standard. As a result, the Company willdid not apply the standard to agreements that have not previously been identified as containing a lease by applying IAS 17 and will excludeIFRIC 4, and excluded lease agreements maturing in the next twelve months, without probable renewal intention, in addition to applying a single discount rate to leases with similar characteristics and excluding to direct initial costs in the measurement of theright-of-use.

Expedients

The Company elected to use the exemptions proposed by the standard on short-term agreements (i.e., that will electbe end within 12 months from the packagecommencement date), lease agreements for which there is an underlying low value asset.

Furthermore, as part of practical expedients permitted under the transition guidance, which does not require reassessmentinitial application of prior conclusions relatedthe standard, the Group has chosen to contracts containingapply the following expedients: (a) retain the definition and/or assessment of whether an arrangement is a lease lease classification andin accordance with current guidance with respect to agreements that exist at the date of initial implementation; (b) apply a single discount rate to a portfolio of leases with reasonably similar characteristics; (c) exclude initial direct costs from measurement of the right-of-use asset at the date of initial application; (d) use hindsight when determining the lease costs. Asterm if the contract includes an accounting policy election, the company will exclude short-term leases (term of 12 monthsextension or less) from the balance sheet presentationtermination option; and will account fornon-lease and lease components in(e) assess whether a contract as a single lease component for most asset classes.is onerous in accordance with IAS 37 immediately before the date of initial implementation instead of assessing impairment of right-of-use assets.

Impacts

On January 1, 2019, the Company’s management estimates that the changes introduced by ASC 842 will have material impacts to be recognized as aright-of-use asset and a lease liability in the financial statements, and these impacts at present value were estimated from R$6.9 to R$8.7 billion in the Company’s financial statements.

The impacts refer basically to the lease agreements of towers, properties, stores, vehicles, and sites.sites (physical spaces) and as described in Notes 16 and 22.

In June 2016,Upon the FASB issued ASUinitial adoption of IFRS 16, the Company recognized a2016-13,right-of-use “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments.” In November 2018, the FASB issued ASUasset and a lease liability in balance sheet. The2018-19,right-of-use “Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses,” which amends the scope and transition requirements of ASU2016-13. The standard requires a financial asset (or a group of financial assets)is measured at amortized cost, basiswhich consists of the initial amount of the lease liability measurement, any initial direct costs incurred by the Company, an estimate of any costs to be presenteddisassemble and remove the asset at the net amount expected to be collected. The measurement of expected credit losses is based on relevant information about past events, including historical experience, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectibilityend of the reported amount. lease, and any lease payments made before the lease commencement date (net of any incentives received), calculated at present value.

The standard will become effective for us beginning January 1, 2020 and will requireCompany depreciates theright-of-use assets on a cumulative-effect adjustment to Accumulated deficit asstraight-line basis from the commencement of the beginninglease to the termination of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective (that is, a modified-retrospective approach). Early adoption is permitted for us as of January 1, 2019. We are currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on our Financial Statements and the timing of adoption.lease.

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

The Company also assesses impairment when such indicators exist, taking into account the concept of forming asset groups for impairment purposes.

At the commencement date, the Company measured the lease liability at the present value of the consideration paid or payable, discounted using the Company’s incremental lending rate.

The lease payments included in the lease liability measurement consist of fixed payments and variable payments based on either an index or a rate.

After the initial measurement, the liability will be written down by the payments made and increased by the interest incurred. If necessary, the liability is recalculated to reflect any remeasurement or change, or if there are changes in the substance of the fixed payments.

When there is a significant contractual change, a lease liability is remeasured and the corresponding adjustment is reflected in theright-of-use asset, or in profit or loss, if theright-of-use asset is already written down to nil.

The Company elected to use the expedients proposed by the standard for lease agreements, for short-term and low value contracts. Accordingly, instead of recognizing aright-of-use asset and a lease liability, these are recognized as an expense in profit or loss over the lease period.

The Company individually measured any new agreement entered into after January 1, 2019 if such agreement contained a lease. A lease is defined as an “a contract, or part of a contract, that conveys the right to use an asset (the underlying asset) for a period of time in exchange for consideration.”

To apply this definition the Company assessed whether a contract meets the three key characteristics:

The agreement contains an identified asset, which is explicitly identified in the agreement or implicitly specified to be identified at the time that the asset is made available to the Company;

The Company has the right to obtain substantially all of the economic benefits from use of the asset throughout the period of use, considering its rights within the scope set out in the agreement; and

The Company has the right to direct the use of the identified asset throughout the period of use the and right to direct “how and for what purpose” the asset is used throughout the period of use.

The Company recognizes the impacts of temporary differences in deferred income tax and social contribution arising from the new standard IFRS 16.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU2016-01, “Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”, which makes targeted improvements to the accounting for, and presentation and disclosure of, financial instruments, except those accounts for under the equity method or those that result in consolidation. ASU2016-01 requires that most equity investments be measured at fair value, with subsequent changes in fair value recognized in net income. ASU2016-01 does not affect the accounting for investments that would otherwise be consolidated or accounted for under the equity method. The new standard also impacts financial liabilities under the fair value option and the presentation and disclosure requirements for financial instruments. The provisions of ASU2016-01 are effective for the Company for annual periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017.

The Company adopted IFRS 16, taking into account the modified retrospective application permitted by the standards. Accordingly, we present below the results for the years period ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, less the effects recognized as a result of this standardapplication.

   Balance at
December 31, 2019

(with IFRS 16)
  IFRS 16
adjustments
  Balance at
December 31, 2019

(w/o IFRS 16)
  Balance at
December 31, 2018
 

Net operating revenue

   20,136,183    20,136,183   22,060,014 

Cost of sales and/or services

   (15,314,814  (589,861  (15,904,675  (16,179,100
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross profit (loss)

   4,821,369   (589,861  4,231,508   5,880,914 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating income (expenses)

     

Share of results of investees

   (5,174   (5,174  (13,492

Selling expenses

   (3,547,684  (7,516  (3,555,200  (3,853,002

General and administrative expenses

   (2,782,300  (5,810  (2,788,110  (2,738,718

Other operating income

   4,527,710    4,527,710   2,204,134 

Other operating expenses

   (5,991,291   (5,991,291  (6,748,094
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   (7,798,739  (13,326  (7,812,065  (11,149,172
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Profit (loss) before financial income (expenses) and taxes

   (2,977,370  (603,187  (3,580,557  (5,268,258

Financial income

   2,662,463    2,662,463   30,950,461 

Financial expenses

   (8,772,181  948,973   (7,823,208  (4,341,595
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Financial income (expenses)

   (6,109,718  948,973   (5,160,745  26,608,866 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Pre-tax profit (loss)

   (9,087,088  345,786   (8,741,302  21,340,608 

Income tax and social contribution

     

Current

   (77,060   (77,060  115,706 

Deferred

   69,041    69,041   3,159,241 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Profit (loss) for the year

   (9,095,107  345,786   (8,749,321  24,615,555 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

IFRIC 23—Uncertainty over Income Tax Treatments

Applies to taxes within the scope of IAS 12, which governs situations when there is uncertainty over the tax treatment adopted by the Company with respect to: (i) whether an entity should assess uncertain tax treatments separately; (ii) what estimates an entity should make about the examination of tax treatments by tax authorities, (iii) how an entity determines taxable income or tax loss, tax bases, unutilized tax loss carryforwards, and untimely tax credits; and (iv) how an entity considers changes in facts and circumstances.

The Company, together with its legal advisors, reviewed this matter and concluded that there is no significant impact to the Company’s financial statements.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

(d.2)

New standards and interpretations not yet adopted

The new and revised standards and interpretations issued by the IASB that are effective in future reporting periods and that the Company decided not to early adopt are the following, effective for periods beginning on or after January 1, 2018 and it did not have a material impact.2020:

New and revised standards

Effective beginning on or after:

IAS 1

Presentation of Financial StatementsJanuary 1, 2020

IAS 8

Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors (Amendment—Definition of material)January 1, 2020

IFRS 3

Business Combinations (Revised—definition of business)

Conceptual framework revised for financial reports

January 1, 2020

The Company is assessing the impact of these changes on the accounting standards.

 

3.

FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND RISK ANALYSIS

 

3.1.

OverviewFair value measurement

The table below summarizes the financial assets and financial liabilities carried atIFRS 13 defines fair value at December 31, 2018 and 2017, excluding Liabilities subjected to compromise (note 28).

   

Accounting
measurement

  2018   2017 
  Carrying
amount
   Fair value   Carrying
amount
   Fair value 

Assets

          

Cash and banks

  Fair value   287,491    287,491    277,500    277,500 

Cash equivalents

  Fair value   4,097,838    4,097,838    6,585,184    6,585,184 

Short-term investments

  Fair value   238,962    238,962    136,286    136,286 

Accounts receivable (i)

  Amortized cost   6,516,555    6,516,555    7,367,442    7,367,442 

Available-for-sale financial asset

  Fair value   1,843,778    1,843,778    1,965,972    1,965,972 

Dividends receivable

  Amortized cost   2,566,935    2,566,935    2,012,146    2,012,146 

Liabilities

          

Trade payables (i)

  Amortized cost   8,818,870    8,818,870    5,170,970    5,170,970 

Borrowings and financing (ii) (iv)

  Amortized cost   7,140,960    7,140,960    54,251    54,251 

Public debentures (iv)

     3,103,106    3,103,106     

Senior notes(iv)

     6,205,840    6,937,764     

Dividends and interest on capital

  Amortized cost   6,168    6,168    6,222    6,222 

Licenses and concessions payable (iii)

  Amortized cost   85,619    85,619    20,910    20,910 

Tax refinancing program (iii)

  Amortized cost   553,206    553,206    888,777    888,777 

(i) The balances of accounts receivables and trade payables have near terms and, therefore, they are not adjusted to fair value. Under the terms and conditions of the Plan, suppliers claiming up to R$150,000, would receive their claims within up to 20 business days, after the date they elect this payment option, which ended on February 26, 2018. As for suppliers claiming more than R$150,000, in turn, would receive the remaining balance in four annual installments, which were adjusted to present value.

(ii) Part of this balance of borrowings and financing with the BNDES and export credit agencies correspond to exclusive markets and, therefore, the fair values of these instruments is similar to their carrying amounts. A portion of the balance of borrowings and financing refers to the bonds issued in the international market, for which is there is a secondary market, and their fair values are different from their carrying amounts.

(iii) The licenses and concessions payable, the tax refinancing program, and other obligations (payable for the acquisition of equity interest) are stated at the amounts that these obligations are expected to be settled and are not adjusted to fair value.

(iv) As a result of the approved Judicial Reorganization Plan, borrowings and financing were novated and their balances recalculated pursuant to the existing terms and conditions, in accordance with the plan’s stages for debt restructuring purposes. The present value adjustment recognized on the balance sheet with respect to each financial liability is amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of that financial liability as a financial expense.

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial Reorganization – Debtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

Fair value of financial instruments

Except for liabilities subject to compromise, the Company and its subsidiaries have measured their financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value using available market inputs and valuation techniques appropriate for each situation. The interpretation of market inputs for the selection of such techniques requires considerable judgment and the preparation of estimates to obtain an amount considered appropriate for each situation. Accordingly, the estimates presented may not necessarily be indicative of the amounts that could be obtained in an active market. The use of different assumptions for the calculation of the fair value may have a material impact on the amounts.

(a)

Derivative financial instruments

As at December 31, 2018, the Company no longer was a party to derivative transactions in effect. Due to the absence of derivative financial instruments in the portfolio as at this date and in 2017, there were no changes in foreign derivative transactions designated or not designated for hedge accounting purposes.

(b)

Non-derivative financial instruments measured at fair value

The fair value of securities traded in active markets is equivalent to the amount of the last closing quotation available at the end of the reporting period, multiplied by the number of outstanding securities.

For the remaining contracts, the Company carries out an analysis comparing the current contractual terms and conditions with the terms and conditions effective for the contract when they were originated. When terms and conditions are dissimilar, fair value is calculated by discounting future cash flows at the market rates prevailing at the end of the period, and when similar, fair value is similar to the carrying amount on the reporting date.

With reference to the fair values of the financial investments in Unitel and CVT, classified as anheld-for-sale financial asset including the recoverable amount of dividends receivable from Unitel, they are estimated based on internal valuation made, including cash flows forecasts for a seven-year period, the choice of a growth rate to extrapolate the cash flows projections, and definition of appropriate discount rates and foreign exchange rates consistent with the reality of each country where the businesses are located. In addition to the financial and business assumptions referred to above, the Company also takes into consideration the fair value measurement of cash investments, qualitative assumptions, including the impacts of developments in the lawsuits filed against third parties, and the opinion of the Company’s legal counsel on the outcome of these lawsuits. With regard to the impairment test of dividends, the Company uses financial assumptions on the discount rate in time and the foreign exchange rate, and uses qualitative assumptions based on the opinion of the legal counsel on the outcome of filed against Unitel for the nonpayment of dividends and interest.

The Company monitors and periodically updates the key assumptions and critical estimates used to calculate fair value.

(c)

Fair value measurement hierarchy

Fair value is the price for which an asset could be exchanged, or a liability settled, between knowledgeable, willing parties, in an arm’s length transaction on measurement date. The standard clarifies that the fair value ismust be based on the assumptions that market participants would consider in pricing an asset or a liability, and in the establishmentestablishes a hierarchy that prioritizes the information used to build such assumptions. The fair value measurement hierarchy attaches more importance to available market inputs (i.e., observable data) and a less weight to inputs based on data without transparency (i.e., unobservable data).

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial Reorganization – Debtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

Additionally, the Company considersstandard requires that an entity consider all nonperformance risk aspects, including the entity’s credit, when measuring the fair value of a liability.

IFRS 7 establishes a three-level hierarchy to measure and disclose fair value. The classification of an instrument in the fair value measurement hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input significant for its measurement. TheWe present below a description of the three-level hierarchy is presented below:hierarchy:

Level 1 - 1—inputs consist of prices quoted (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities to which the entity has access on measurement date.date;

Level 2 - 2—inputs are different from prices quoted in active markets used in Level 1 and consist of directly or indirectly observable inputs for the asset or liability. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; or inputs that are observable for the asset or liability or that can support the observed market inputs by correlation or otherwise for substantially the entire asset or liability.

Level 3 - 3—inputs used to measure an asset or liability are not based on observable market variables. These inputs represent management’s best estimates and are generally measured using pricing models, discounted cash flows, or similar methodologies that require significant judgment or estimate.

ThereThe Company and its subsidiaries have measured their financial assets and financial liabilities at their market or actual realizable values (fair value) using available market inputs and valuation techniques appropriate for each situation. The interpretation of market inputs for the selection of such techniques requires considerable judgment and the preparation of estimates to obtain an amount considered appropriate for each situation. Accordingly, the estimates presented may not necessarily be indicative of the amounts that could be obtained in an active market. The use of different assumptions for the calculation of the fair value may have a material impact on the amounts obtained.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

As a result of the implementation of the measures approved on the Plan ratified on January 8, 2018 and the related accounting recognition in calendar year 2018, some financial liabilities classified at amortized cost were no transfers between levels duringremeasured at their fair values as at the date of the novation of these financial liabilities and recognized at amortized cost in the subsequent measurement, pursuant to the accounting guidance of IFRS 9.

The carrying amounts and the estimated fair values of our main financial assets and financial liabilities as at December 31, 2019 and 2018 and 2017.are summarized as follows:

 

   Fair value
measurement
hierarchy
   Fair value
2018
   Fair value
2017
 

Assets

      

Cash

   Level 1    287,491    277,500 

Cash equivalents

   Level 2    4,097,838    6,585,184 

Short-term investments

   Level 2    238,962    136,286 

Held-for-sale financial asset (Note 26)

   Level 3    1,843,778    1,965,972 

Assets

  Accounting
measurement
   2019   2018 
  Carrying
amount
   Fair value   Carrying
amount
   Fair value 

Cash and banks

   Fair value    575,863    575,863    287,491    287,491 

Cash equivalents

   Fair value    1,506,082    1,506,082    4,097,838    4,097,838 

Cash investments

   Fair value    217,792    217,792    238,962    238,962 

Accounts receivable (i)

   Amortized cost    6,334,526    6,334,526    6,516,555    6,516,555 

Dividends and interest on capital

   Amortized cost    426    426     

Financial asset at fair value

   Fair value    40,689    40,689     

Held-for-sale assets

          

Held-for-sale financial asset (Note 31)

   Fair value    1,474,699    1,474,699    1,843,778    1,843,778 

Dividends receivable (Note 31)

   Amortized cost    2,435,014    2,435,014    2,566,935    2,566,935 
          

Liabilities

                    

Trade payables (i)

   Amortized cost    8,887,367    8,887,367    8,818,870    8,818,870 

Derivative financial instruments

   Fair value    1,152    1,152     

Borrowings and financing (ii)

          

Borrowings and financing

   Amortized cost    8,354,777    8,354,777    7,140,960    7,140,960 

Public debentures

   Amortized cost    3,652,353    3,652,353    3,103,106    3,103,106 

Senior Notes

   Amortized cost    6,219,619    6,565,782    6,205,840    6,937,764 

Dividends and interest on capital

   Amortized cost    5,731    5,731    6,168    6,168 

Licenses and concessions payable (iii)

   Amortized cost    58,582    58,582    85,619    85,619 

Tax refinancing program (iii)

   Amortized cost    417,503    417,503    553,206    553,206 

Leases payable (iv)

   Amortized cost��   8,150,026    8,150,026     

For the closing of the year ended December 31, 2019:

(i)

The balances of accounts receivables have near terms and, therefore, they are not adjusted to fair value. The balances of trade receivables, subject to the judicial reorganization, were adjusted to their fair value, at the date of the novation of the liabilities and are represented by the amounts that are expected that the obligations are discharged (Note 18).

(ii)

The balance of the borrowings and financing with the BNDES, Local Banks, and ECAs correspond to exclusive markets, and the fair value of these instruments is similar to their carrying amounts. The balances of borrowings and financing refers to the bonds issued in the international market, for which is there is a secondary market, and their fair values differ from their carrying amounts.

(iii)

The licenses and concessions payable and the tax refinancing program are stated at the amounts that these obligations are expected to be discharged and are not adjusted to fair value.

(iv)

The leases payable are represented by the amounts that the obligations are expected to be settled, adjusted at present value.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

The levels of the financial assets, cash and cash equivalents and cash investments,held-for-sale assets, and derivative financial instruments at fair value as at December 31, 2019 and 2018 are as follows:

   Fair value
measurement
hierarchy
  Fair value 
  2019   2018 

Assets

      

Cash and banks

  Level 1   575,863    287,491 

Cash equivalents

  Level 1   1,506,082    4,097,838 

Cash investments

  Level 1   217,792    238,962 

Held-for-sale financial asset

  Level 3   1,474,699    1,843,778 

Liabilities

      

Derivative financial instruments

  Level 2   1,152   

There were no transfers between levels in the years ended December 31, 20182019 and 2017.2018.

The Company and its subsidiaries have measured their financial assets and financial liabilities at their market or actual realizable values (fair value) using available market inputs and valuation techniques appropriate for each situation, as follows:

 

3.2.(a)

Measurement of financial assetsCash, cash equivalents and financial liabilities at amortized costcash investments

Foreign currency-denominated cash equivalents and cash investments are basically kept in checking deposits denominated in euro and US dollars and, to a lesser extent, in euros.

The fair value of securities traded in active markets is equivalent to the amount of the last closing quotation available at the end of the year, multiplied by the number of outstanding securities.

For the remaining contracts, the Company carries out an analysis comparing the current contractual terms and conditions with the terms and conditions effective for the contract when they were originated.

When terms and conditions are dissimilar, fair value is calculated by discounting future cash flows at the market rates prevailing at the end of the year, and when similar, fair value is similar to the carrying amount on the reporting date.

(b)

Held-for-sale assets

Represents the indirect interest held by PT Ventures in the dividends receivable and the fair value of the financial instruments mentioned below isinvestment in Unitel, both classified as held for sale. The assets from the investment held in PT Ventures are measured substantially close toat the carrying amounts due tofair value of the following reasons:

Accounts receivables: short-term maturity of bills.

Trade payables, dividendsinvestment for sale, which occurred on January 23, 2020. See Notes 31 and interests on capital: all obligations are due to be settled in the short term.

Borrowings and financing: all transactions are adjusted33 for inflation based on contractual indices.further information.

Licenses and concessions payable, tax refinancing program and other payables (payable for the acquisition of equity interests): all payables are adjusted for inflation based on the contractual indices.

 

3.3.(c)

Derivative financial instruments

The Company conducts derivative transactions to manage certain market risks, mainly the foreign exchange risk. At the closing date of for the year ended December 31, 2019, these instruments includeNon-deliverable Forward (NDF) contracts. The Company does not use derivatives for any purposes other than hedging against these risks.

The method used to calculate the fair value of the derivative instruments contracted throughout the year was the future cash flows method associated to each contracted instrument, discounted using the market rates prevailing at the reporting date.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

3.2.

Financial risk management

The Company’s and its subsidiaries’ activities expose them to several financial risks, such as: market risk (including currency fluctuation risk, interest rate risk on fair value, interest rate risk on cash flows, and price risk)flows), credit risk, and liquidity risk. According to their nature, financial instruments may involve known or unknown risks, and it is important to assess to the best judgment the potential of these risks. The Company and its subsidiaries may use derivative financial instruments to mitigate certain exposures to these risks.

The Company’s risk management process is a three-step process, taking into account its consolidated structure: strategic, tactical, and operational. At the strategic level, the Company’s executive committee agrees with the Board of Directors the risk guidelines to be followed. A Financial Risk Management Committee is responsible for overseeing and ensuring that Oi comply with the existing policies. At the operating level, risk management is carried out by the Company’s treasury officer, in accordance with the policies approved by the Board of Directors, carries out risk management.Directors.

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial Reorganization – Debtor-in-PossessionThe Financial Risk Management Committee meets on a monthly basis and Subsidiaries

Notes tocurrently consists of the Financial Statements

forChief Finance Officer, the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017Regulation, Wholesale and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

International Affairs Officer, the Legal Tax Officer, the Chief Controller, the Investor Relations Officer, and the Treasury Officer.

The Hedging and Cash Investments Policies, approved by the Board of Directors, document the management of exposures to market risk factors generated by the financial transactions of the Oi Group companies.

In the aftermath of the approval of the JRP, based on the measured new risk factors, the Company approved with the Board of Directors a new strategy to the Board of Directors to mitigate the risks arising on the foreign exchange exposure of its financial liabilities, as is ready to implement it as from this point in time. In line with the Hedging Policy pillars, the strategy is focused on the preservation of the Company’s cash flows, maintaining theits liquidity, and complycomplying with the financial covenants.

 

3.4.1.3.2.1.

Market risk

 

(a)

Foreign exchange risk

Financial assets

The Company is not exposed to any material foreign exchange risk involving foreign currency-denominated financial assets as at December 31, 2018 and 2017,2019, except with regard to the assets held for sale, for which there was no currency hedging transactions.

Net investment in foreign subsidiaries

The risks related to the Company’s investments in foreign currency arise mainly from the investments in the subsidiaries in Africa. The Company does not haveenter into any contracted instrument to hedge against the risk associated to the net investments in foreign companies.currency hedging transaction.

Financial liabilities

The Company and its subsidiaries have foreign currency-denominated or foreign currency-indexed borrowings and financing. The risk associated with these liabilities is related to the possibility of fluctuations in foreign exchange rates that could increase the balance of such liabilities. The Company’s and its subsidiaries’ borrowings and financing exposed to this risk represent approximately 53.6% (72.9% in 2017)52.3% of total liabilities from borrowings and financing.financing (2018 – 53.6%), less the contracted currency hedging transactions. To minimize this type of risk, the Company entered into currency hedges with financial institutions for part of the foreign currency-denominated interest payments made in 2019. The Company hedged 67% of its total dollar-denominated debt service in 2019 through hedging transactions in the form of currency forwards and foreign currency-denominated cash investments. At the end of December 2019, approximately 32% of the US dollar-denominated debt for 2020 was hedged by cash in US dollars (natural hedge). Additionally, the Company hedged part of the Company’s US dollar-denominated operating expenses.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

The currency hedging percentage for purposes of covenant compliance and the financial expenses of the existing borrowings and financing, including the impacts of changes in foreign exchange rates on the fair value adjustment gain, is 50.1%.

Foreign currency-denominated financial assets and financial liabilities are presented in the balance sheet as follows (includes intragroup balances):follows:

 

  2018   2017   2019   2018 
Carrying
amount
   Fair value   Carrying
amount
   Fair
value
   Carrying
amount
   Fair value   Carrying
amount
   Fair value 

Financial assets

                

Cash

   70,116    70,116    82,482    82,482 

Cash and banks

   400,874    400,874    70,116    70,116 

Cash equivalents

   154,514    154,514    1,307    1,307    1,096    1,096    154,514    154,514 

Short-term investments

       662    662 

Held-for-sale assets

        

Held-for-sale financial asset

   1,474,699    1,474,699    1,843,778    1,843,778 

Dividends receivable

   2,435,014    2,435,014    2,566,935    2,566,935 

Financial liabilities

                

Borrowings and financing

   8,816,766    9,548,690    (*)    (*) 

Borrowings and financing (Note 20)

   9,521,291    9,521,291    8,816,766    9,548,690 

Derivative financial instruments

   1,152    1,152     

(*) In lightThe amounts of the filingderivative financial instruments are summarized as follows:

   Derivatives designated for hedge accounting 
  Notional (US$)   Maturity (years)   Fair value 
  Amounts
(payable)/receivable
 
  2019 

USD/R$Non-deliverable forwards (NDF)

   17,000.00    < 1 year    (1,152

At yearend, the main hedging transactions conducted with financial institutions with the objective minimizing the foreign exchange risk co cambial are as follows:

Non-deliverable Forward (NDF) contracts

US$/R$: Refer to future dollar purchase transactions using NDFs to hedge against the depreciation of the judicial reorganization requestBrazilian real against the US dollar. The key strategy for these contracts is to eliminate foreign exchange differences during the contract period, mitigating unfavorable changes in foreign exchange rates on June 20, 2016,dollar-denominated debts or operating expenses.

As at December 31, 2019, the Company’sCompany recognized as result of derivative transactions the amounts shown below:

2019

Forward currency transaction – financial results

55,025

Forward currency transaction – operating results

17,088

Total

72,113

The movements in foreign currency-denominated financial liabilities are part of the list of payables subject to renegotiation.exchange hedges designated for hedge accounting were recognized in other comprehensive income.

Table of movements in hedge accounting effects in other comprehensive income

Balance at 12/31/2018

Results of designated hedges

11,901

Amortization of hedges to profit or loss

(13,053

Balance at 12/31/2019

(1,152)

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

Foreign exchange risk sensitivity analysis

For purposesAs at December 31, 2019, management estimated the depreciation scenarios of this analysis, the Brazilian real in relation to other currencies, at the end of the reporting period.

The rates used for the probable scenario were the rates prevailing at the end of December 2018 and 2017.2019. The probable rates were then depreciated by 25% and 50% and used as benchmark for the possible and remote scenarios, respectively.

 

  Rate Rate   Rate 

Description

  2018   Depreciation 2017   Depreciation   2019   Depreciation 

Probable scenario

           

US dollar

   3.8748    0 3.3080    0

U.S. dollar

   4.0307    0% 

Euro

   4.4390    0 3.9693    0   4.5305    0% 

Possible scenario

           

US dollar

   4.8435    25 4.1350    25

U.S. dollar

   5.0384    25% 

Euro

   5.5488    25 4.9616    25   5.6631    25% 

Remote scenario

           

US dollar

   5.8122    50 4.9620    50

U.S. dollar

   6.0461    50% 

Euro

   6.6585    50 5.9540    50   6.7958    50% 

The impacts of foreign exchange exposure on the foreign currency-denominated debt, considering offshore derivatives and cash, in the sensitivity scenarios estimated by the Company, are shown in the table below:

 

2018

 
   2019 

Description

  

Individual risk

  Probable
scenario
   Possible
scenario
   Remote
scenario
   Individual risk   Probable
scenario
 Possible
scenario
 Remote
scenario
 

US dollar debt

  Dollar appreciation   15,216,581    19,020,726    22,824,872 

US dollar debts

   Dollar appreciation    15,594,278  19,492,848  23,391,418 

US dollar cash

  Dollar depreciation   (154,852   (193,566   (232,279   Dollar depreciation    (283,409 (354,261 (425,113

Euro debt

  Euro appreciation   2,656,697    3,320,871    3,985,045    Euro appreciation    2,711,459  3,389,323  4,067,188 

Euro cash

  Euro depreciation   (69,777   (87,221   (104,666   Euro depreciation    (112,796 (140,995 (169,194

Present value adjustment

  Dollar/euro depreciation   (9,046,285   (11,307,855   (13,569,427
    

 

   

 

   

 

 

Fair value adjustment

   Dollar/euro depreciation    (8,772,305 (10,965,381 (13,158,458

Total assets/liabilities indexed to exchange fluctuation

     8,602,364    10,752,955    12,903,545      9,137,227   11,421,534   13,705,841 
    

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total (gain) loss

       2,150,591    4,301,181       2,284,307   4,568,614 
      

 

   

 

 

 

(b)

Interest rate risk

Financial assets

Cash equivalents and short-termcash investments in local currency are substantially maintained in financial investment funds exclusively managed for the Company and its subsidiaries, and investments in private securities issued by prime financial institutions.

The interest rate risk linked to these assets arises from the possibility of decreases in these rates and consequent decrease in the return on these assets.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

Financial liabilities

The Company and its subsidiaries have borrowings and financing subject to floating interest rates, based on the Long-term Interest Rate (TJLP), the CDI, or the Benchmark Rate in the case of real-denominated debt as at December 31, 2018.2019. After the approval of the JRP, the Company does not have borrowings and financing subject to foreign currency-denominated floating interest rate.

As at December 31, 2018,2019, approximately 46.1% (32.9%47.5% (46.0% at December 31, 2017)2018) of the incurred debt was subject to floating interest rates. The most material exposure of Company’s and its subsidiaries’ debt after is to CDI. Therefore, a continued increase in this interest rate would have an adverse impact on future interest payments.

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial Reorganization – Debtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

These assets and liabilities are presented in the balance sheet as follows:

 

  2018   2017   2019   2018 
Carrying
amount
   Fair value   Carrying
amount
   Fair value   Carrying
amount
   Market
value
   Carrying
amount
   Market
value
 

Financial assets

                

Cash equivalents

   3,943,324    3,943,324    6,583,877    6,583,877    1,504,986    1,504,986    3,943,324    3,943,324 

Short-term investments

   238,962    238,962    135,624    135,624 

Cash investments

   217,792    217,792    238,962    238,962 

Financial liabilities

                

Borrowings and financing

   7,633,140    7,633,140     

Borrowings and financing (Note 20)

   8,705,458    8,705,458    7,633,140    7,633,140 

Interest rate fluctuation risk sensitivity analysis

The Company is exposed to interest rate risk on its cash and cash equivalents and its indebtedness. The interest rate risk on the indebtedness is from the portion of the indebtedness having a variable interest rate. Changes in the interest rates could impact the amount of interest that the Company is required to pay or receive.

Management believes that the most material risk related to interest rate fluctuations arises from its liabilities pegged to the TJLPCDI and primarily the CDI.TJLP. This risk is associated to an increase in those rates. It is worth mentioning that theThe TJLP rate remained stable at 7.0% per yearp.a. from April 1, 2017 to until December 31, 2017. Beginning January 1, 2018, the TJLP was being successively reduced: 6.75% per year up to March 2018, 6.6% per year from April to June 2018, and 6.56% from July to September 2018, and increased again2018. In turn, from October to December 2018 this rate was increased to 6.98% per year.year, it was increased to 7.03%, from January to March 2019, to 7.03%, and reduced again from April to June to 6.26%, from July to September to 5.95%, and from October to December to 5.57%. At the end of the quarter however, the National Monetary Council decided to increasereduce this rate again to 7.03%5.09% per year, effective for January-March 2019.2020.

Management estimated the fluctuation scenarios of the rates CDI and TJLP as at December 31, 2018.2019. The rates used for the probable scenario were the rates prevailing at the end of the reporting year.

For purposes of this analysis, theThese rates used for the probable scenario were the rates prevailing at the end of December 2018 and 2017. The probable rates were then depreciatedhave been stressed by 25% and 50%, and used as benchmark for the possible and remote scenarios.

 

2018

2019

2019

Interest rate scenarios

Interest rate scenarios

Interest rate scenarios

Probable scenario

Probable scenario

  Possible scenario  Remote scenario

Probable scenario

  

Possible scenario

  

Remote scenario

CDI

  TJLP  CDI  TJLP  CDI  TJLP  

TJLP

  

CDI

  

TJLP

  

CDI

  

TJLP

6.40

  6.98  8.00  8.73  9.60  10.47

4.59%

  5.57%  5.74%  6.96%  6.89%  8.36%

Such sensitivity analysis considers payment outflows in future dates. Thus, the aggregate of the amounts for each scenario is not equivalent to the fair values, or even the presentfair values of these liabilities.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

The impacts of exposure to interest rates, in the sensitivity scenarios estimated by the Company, are shown in the table below:

 

    2018 

Description

  Individual
risk
   Probable
scenario
   Possible
scenario
   Remote
scenario
 

CDI-indexed debt

   CDI increase    4,122,410    5,373,161    6,714,517 

TJLP-indexed debt

   TJLP increase    4,067,506    5,011,606    6,030,280 
    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets/liabilities pegged to the interest rate

     8,189,916    10,384,767    12,744,797 
    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total (gain) loss

       2,194,851    4,554,881 
      

 

 

   

 

 

 

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial Reorganization – Debtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

    2019 

Description

  Individual risk   Probable scenario   Possible scenario   Remote scenario 

Debt pegged to CDI

   CDI increase    4,601,044    5,330,277    6,583,653 

Debt pegged to TJLP

   TJLP increase    3,221,576    4,232,356    4,972,246 

Total assets/liabilities pegged to the interest rate

     7,822,620    9,562,633    11,555,899 

Total (gain) loss

       1,740,013    3,733,279 

 

3.4.2.3.2.2.

Credit risk

The concentration of credit risk associated to trade receivables is immaterial due to the diversification of the portfolio. Doubtful receivables are adequately covered by an allowance for doubtful accounts.

Transactions with financial institutions (cash investments and borrowings and financing) are made with prime entities, avoiding the concentration risk. The credit risk of financial investments is assessed by setting caps for investment in the counterparts, taking into consideration the ratings released by the main international risk rating agencies for each one of such counterparts. AtAs at December 31, 2018,2019, approximately 94.14%80.92% of the consolidated cash investments were made with counterparties with an AAA, AA, A, and or sovereign risk rating.

The Company has credit risks related to dividends receivable associated to the investment in Unitel (Note 26).

 

3.4.3.3.2.3.

Liquidity risk

The liquidity risk also arises from the possibility of the Company being unable to discharge its liabilities on maturity dates and obtain cash due to market liquidity restrictions. Management uses its resources mainly to fund capital expenditures incurred on the expansion and upgrading of the network, invest in new businesses.

The Company’s management monitors the continual forecasts of the liquidity requirements to ensure that the company has sufficient cash to meet its operating needs and fund capital expenditure to modernize and expand its network.

In lightAt the beginning of 2019, Oi completed the capital increase provided for in the JRP. With this increase, the Company received R$4.0 billion, which were allocated to the incremental CAPEX Plan, directed to the expansion of the confirmationmobile and fixed infrastructure, while focused primarily on the fiber optics project. In addition to the capital increase, to finance the incremental CAPEX associated to the Strategic Plan, the Company plans to divest unessential and release cash throughnon-operating event such as, for example, tax credits. Added to this debt is the issue of up to R$2.5 billion in simple, nonconvertible debentures by Oi Móvel, a prepetition financing line, in the form of DIP Financing, in line with the provisions of Clause 5.3 of the JR Plan,Company’s PRJ.

Capital management

The Company seeks to manage its equity structure according to best market practices.

The objective of the Company’s obligations relatedcapital management strategy is to ensure that liquidity levels and financial leverage allow the sustained growth of the Group, the compliance with the strategic investment plan, and generation of returns to our shareholders.

We may change our capital structure, according to existing economic and financial conditions, to optimize our financial leverage and debt management.

The indicators used to measure capital structure management are: gross debt to accumulated twelve-month EBITDA (earnings before interest (financial income and expenses), taxes, depreciation, and amortization), and the interest coverage ratio, as shown below:

Gossdebt-to-EBITDA

between 2x and 4.0x

Interest coverage ratio (*)

higher than 1.75

(*)

Measure the Company’s capacity to cover its future interest obligations.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the contractual maturitiesConsolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

3.2.4.

Risk of accelerated maturity of borrowings and financing

Any default event in some debt instruments of the Company and its subsidiaries might result in accelerated maturity of other borrowings and financing.Currently, the Company does not anticipate any risk of default on any of its regular cash obligations.

The risk of accelerated maturity arising from noncompliance of financial liabilities, including interest payments on borrowings, financing, and debentures were novated and the related balances were recalculated accordingcovenants associated to the JR Plan terms and conditions,debt was mitigated through a waiver that prevents acceleration due to failure to comply with certain covenants in accordance withfirst quarter of 2020. For further detail, see Note 20, in the JR Plan stages for debt restructuring purposes.section ‘Covenants’.

 

4.

NET OPERATING REVENUE

 

  2018   2017   2016   2019 2018 2017 

Gross operating revenue (*)

   30,426,548    36,338,432    45,327,110 
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Gross operating revenue

   27,218,787   30,426,548   36,338,432 

Deductions from gross revenue

   (8,366,534   (12,548,778   (19,330,687   (7,082,604  (8,366,534  (12,548,778
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Taxes

   (6,725,356   (7,707,961   (7,760,930   (5,641,876 (6,725,356 (7,707,961

Discounts and other deductions (*)

   (1,641,178   (4,840,817   (11,569,757
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Other deductions

   (1,440,728 (1,641,178 (4,840,817

Net operating revenue

   22,060,014    23,789,654    25,996,423    20,136,183   22,060,014   23,789,654 
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

(*) The Company simplified the breakdown of its bills sent to its customers. The changes in billing do not impact the taxes levied on sales and/or services or the net revenue.

5.

REVENUE AND EXPENSES BY NATURE

   December 31,
2019
  December 31,
2018
  December 31,
2017
 

Operating expenses by nature

    

Third-party services

   (6,030,542  (5,924,556  (6,221,058

Depreciation and amortization

   (6,873,945  (5,811,123  (5,109,292

Rentals and Insurance (i)

   (2,575,862  (4,200,212  (4,162,659

Personnel

   (2,528,823  (2,594,464  (2,791,331

Network maintenance service

   (1,014,432  (1,104,015  (1,251,511

Interconnection

   (487,413  (658,068  (778,083

Provision for contingencies

   (216,438  (202,268  (469,440

Expected credit losses

   (489,396  (697,324  (691,807

Advertising and marketing

   (497,278  (382,091  (413,580

Handset and other costs

   (170,860  (196,347  (223,335

Impairment gain (loss) (ii)

   (2,111,022  (291,758  4,747,141 

Taxes and other expenses

   (110,568  (249,688  (542,832

Other operating income (expenses), net (iii)

   (6,974  (5,016,358  (8,242,895

Total operating expenses

   (23,113,553  (27,328,272  (26,150,682

Operating expenses by function

    

Cost of sales and/or services

   (15,314,814  (16,179,100  (15,668,653

Selling expenses

   (3,547,684  (3,853,002  (4,102,556

General and administrative expenses

   (2,782,300  (2,738,718  (3,136,808

Other operating income

   4,527,710   2,204,134   1,985,101 

Other operating expenses

   (5,996,465  (6,761,586  (5,227,766

Total operating expenses by function

   (23,113,553  (27,328,272  (26,150,682

(i)

The semiannual comparison was impacted by the adoption of IFRS 16—Leases beginning January 1, 2019 (Note 2(d)).

(ii)

As required by IAS 36, the Company conducts annually an impairment test of its assets with finite useful lives and recognizes an impairment loss related to the expected future profitability of such assets. The Company took into consideration in its assumptions for the 2019 impairment test, among other aspects, the Strategic Plan disclosed in July 2019. The plan rests on transformation actions, focused on improving operational and financial performance (see Note 17).

(iii)

In 2019, refers primarily to: (a) the recognition of other income from PIS and COFINS credits arising on the deduction of ICMS from PIS and COFINS tax base, as well as the recovery of unduly paid amounts on that tax base, as ruled in the final and unappealable court decision issued in March and September 2019, amounting to R$1,517,919 (Note 11) and (b) the recognition of expenses on the provision related to an onerous contract for the supply of satellite capacity, amounting to R$1,230,820 (Note 25), and (c) recognition of expenses related to the derecognition arising from the reconciliation of prior periods’ tax credits and incentives, which are not expected to be realized, amounting to R$167,395. In 2018 refers basically to: (a) expenses on the provision related to the recognition of the onerous contract for the provision of submarine cable capacity, amounting to R$4,883,620; and (b) recognition of income from the reversal of the provision for the contingency, amounting to R$109,242, arising from the reprocessing of the provision estimation model taking into account the new profile and history of discontinuation of lawsuits in the context of the approval and ratification of the JRP. In 2017, R$6,482,485 refer main to the additional provision arising from the review of the calculations of the provision for contingencies related administrative proceedings and lawsuits involving ANATEL, talking into accounting the publication of the decision that grants the judicial reorganization in February 5, 2018.

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

5.

OPERATING EXPENSES

   2018   2017   2016 

Operating expenses by nature

      

Third-party services

   (5,924,556   (6,221,058   (6,399,191

Depreciation and amortization

   (5,952,905   (5,881,302   (6,310,619

Rentals and Insurance

   (4,341,969   (4,162,659   (4,329,546

Personnel

   (2,594,464   (2,791,331   (2,852,224

Network maintenance service

   (1,104,015   (1,251,511   (1,540,320

Interconnection

   (658,068   (778,083   (1,173,475

Provision for contingencies

   (89,777   (143,517   (1,056,410

Provision for bad debt (i)

   (1,070,301   (691,807   (643,287

Advertising and marketing

   (382,091   (413,580   (448,990

Handset and other costs

   (196,347   (223,335   (284,119

Impairment losses (ii)

   —      (46,534   (225,512

Taxes and other expenses

   (134,558   (345,132   (559,162

Other operating income (expenses), net (iii)

   (132,739   (1,234,477   (226,890
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

   (22,581,790   (24,184,326   (26,049,745
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating expenses by function

      

Cost of sales and/or services

   (15,822,732   (15,676,216   (16,741,791

Selling expenses

   (4,478,352   (4,399,936   (4,383,163

General and administrative expenses

   (2,697,865   (3,064,252   (3,687,706

Other operating income

   2,204,134    1,985,101    1,756,100 

Other operating expenses

   (1,773,483   (3,028,590   (2,988,067

Equity pick up

   (13,492   (433   (5,118
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total operating expenses by function

   (22,581,790   (24,184,326   (26,049,745
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(i)

In 2018, the Company reassessed the assumptions for estimate adopted for the provision for bad debt.

(ii)

As at December 31, 2018, no impairment was recognized. As at December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company conducted the annual impairment test and recognized a loss on goodwill related to Africa which is being reported as held for sale, in amounting R$46,534 and R$225,512, respectively.

(iii)

In 2017 refers to the effects ofnon-recurring expenses related to unrecoverable tax,write-off of other assets and other expenses of R$1,234 million (R$227 million in 2016) due to reconcile the accounting balances as part of the process of JRP.

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial Reorganization – Debtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

6.

FINANCIAL INCOME (EXPENSES)

 

   2018   2017   2016 

Financial income

      

Exchange differences on translating foreign short-term investments (trading)

   1,329      (135,226

Interest on judicial deposits and other assets

   808,764    1,049,923    615,085 

Income from short-term investments

   142,597      112,394 

Other income

   571,884    500,260    578,452 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   1,524,574    1,550,183    1,170,705 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Financial expenses and other charges

      

a)  Borrowing and financing costs (i)

      

Inflation and exchange losses on third-party borrowings

   (2,645,980     4,580,177 

Interest on borrowings payable to third parties

   (1,399,687     (2,177,976

Derivatives

       (5,147,958
  

 

 

     

 

 

 

Subtotal:

   (4,045,667     (2,745,757
  

 

 

     

 

 

 

b)  Other charges

      

Loss onheld-for-sale financial assets (ii)

   292,700    (267,008   (1,090,295

Interest on other liabilities

   (800,413   (1,641,278   (598,301

Tax on transactions and bank fees

   (428,872   (512,003   (679,294

Monetary variation to provisions for contingencies

   8,076    (264,511   (238,428

Interest on taxes in installments - tax financing program

   (28,079   (27,294   (19,869

Other expenses (iii)

   (534,386   (450,147   (174,070
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Subtotal:

   (1,490,974   (3,162,241   (2,800,257
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   (5,536,641   (3,162,241   (5,546,014
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Financial expenses, net

   (4,012,067   (1,612,058   (4,375,309
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   2019  2018  2017 

Financial income

    

Fair value adjustment (i)

   48,756   13,290,262   4,873,000 

Monetary correction and foreign exchange differences on the fair value adjustment

   334,269   1,398,594  

Gain on the restructuring of third-party borrowings (ii)

    11,054,800  

Interest on and monetary correction to other assets (iii)

   1,922,176   808,764   1,049,923 

Income from cash investments

   238,828   316,880   702,171 

Exchange differences on translating foreign cash investments

   (52,013  1,329   11,105 

Reversal of interest and other income (iv)

   170,447   4,079,832   500,260 

Total

   2,662,463   30,950,461   7,136,459 

Financial expenses and other charges

    

a)  Borrowing and financing costs

    

Recognition of fair value adjustment

   (910,491  (760,197 

Monetary correction to and exchange losses on third-party borrowings (v)

   (640,068  (2,493,618  (2,920,455

Interest on borrowings from third parties (vi)

   (1,295,545  1,299,094   (3,122,166

Interest on debentures (vi)

   (322,218  493,833   (472,173

Subtotal:

   (3,168,322  (1,460,888  (6,514,794

b)  Other charges

    

Interest on leases

   (948,973  

Gain (loss) on cash investments classified as held for sale

   (237,593  292,700   (267,008

Tax on transactions and bank fees

   (456,579  (870,488  (512,003

Interest on, monetary correction to, and foreign exchange differences on other liabilities (vii)

   (1,854,304  (1,251,215  (1,553,746

Monetary correction to (provisions)/reversals (viii)

   (1,620,378  (226,870  (674,668

Interest on taxes in installments—tax financing program

   (16,159  (28,079  (27,294

Derivative transactions

   55,025   

Other expenses (ix)

   (524,898  (796,755  (783,458

Subtotal:

   (5,603,859  (2,880,707  (3,818,177

Total

   (8,772,181  (4,341,595  (10,332,971

Financial income (expenses)

   (6,109,718  26,608,866   (3,196,512

 

(i)

In 2018, contractual interest and foreign currency fluctuation result fromrefers to the incurrence of R$4,045 million of Borrowings and financing expenses as a resultrecognition of the settlementfair value of many of the claims in our JR Proceedings related to the debt instruments compared to nothird-party borrowings and financing expenses duringarising from the corresponding periodimpacts of the ratification of the JRP. In 2017, duerefers to the eliminationadjustment to present value arising from the revision of the borrowings and financing expenses as a resultcalculations of the commencementprovision for contingencies related to administrative proceedings and lawsuits involving ANATEL, taking into account the best estimate of future cash outflows based on the JR Proceedingspayment methods prescribed in June 2016.the JRP.

(ii)

In 2018, refers basically to the exchange gain relatedpositive impact of the novation of the debt represented by the qualified Senior Notes, calculated pursuant to the depreciation of Brazilian real against the US dollar and loss of R$489 million / US$126 million resulting from the revision of the recoverable amount of dividends receivable from Unitel and the fair value of the cash investment in Unitel. In 2017, refers to the loss of R$129 million / US$39 million (R$789 million / US$242 million in 2016) resulting from the revision of the recoverable amount of dividends receivable from Unitel and the fair value of the cash investment in Unitel and exchange losses related to the depreciation of the Kwanza against the US dollar and the Brazilian real.JRP.

(iii)

In 2019, refers to the accounting recognition amounting R$2,100 million related to the monetary correction to PIS and COFINS credits arising from the deduction of ICMS from the tax base of PIS and COFINS, as well as the recovery of unduly paid amounts as PIS and COFINS, under a final and unappealable court decision reached in March and September 2019, as described in Note 11.

(iv)

In 2018, represented mainly by the reversal of the interest expenses on debt included in the JRP, adjusted in the period prior to the ratification of the Plan amounting to R$3,013 million and adjustment of trade payables and default payment to fair value amounting to R$877 million.

(v)

In 2018, includes R$555 million related to the modification gain associated to the novation of debts arising on the Senior Notes.

(vi)

In 2018, represented mainly by the reversal of interest on the debt included in the JRP amounting to R$3,115 million and interest expenses on novated debt and debentures totaling R$167 million.

(vii)

This line item includes interest related to the present value adjustment associated with the liabilities of onerous contracts and trade payables subject to the Judicial Reorganization.

(viii)

In 2019, includes the impact arising on the review of the provision estimate calculation methodology of the labor and civil contingencies, supported by the loss risk assessment made by the Company’s legal advisors. The Company recognized new provision for labor and civil contingencies, during 2019, related to the review of the provision estimate calculation methodology, and part of the amount was recognized in financial expenses due to monetary corrections in compliance with the Law applicable for Labor and Civil proceedings.

(ix)

Represented mainly by financial banking fees and commissions.

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

7.

INCOME TAX AND SOCIAL CONTRIBUTION

Income taxes encompass the income tax and the social contribution. The income tax rate is 25% and the social contribution rate is 9%, generating aggregate nominal tax rate of 34%.

The provision for income tax and social contribution is broken down as follows:

   2019  2018   2017 

Income tax and social contribution

     

Current taxes

   (77,060  115,706    (906,080

Deferred taxes (Note 10)

   69,041   3,159,241    (192,542

Total

   (8,019  3,274,947    (1,098,622

   2019  2018  2017 

Pre-tax profit (loss)

   (9,087,088  21,340,608   (5,557,540

Income tax and social contribution

    

Income tax and social contribution on taxed income

   3,089,610   (7,255,807  1,889,564 

Equity in investees

   (1,759  (4,587  (147

Tax incentives (basically, operating profit) (i)

   1,263   3,068   14,008 

Permanent deductions(add-backs) (ii)

   (312,512  13,285,260   148,424 

Reversal of (Allowance for) impairment losses on deferred tax assets (iii)

   (2,474,232  (2,757,044  (2,717,564

Tax effects of deferred tax assets of foreign subsidiaries (iv)

   (310,389  4,057   (432,907

Income tax and social contribution effect on profit or loss

   (8,019  3,274,947   (1,098,622

(i)

Refers basically to the exploration profit recognized in the profit or loss of subsidiary Oi Móvel pursuant to Law 11638/2007.

(ii)

In 2019, the tax effects from permanentadd-backs are represented mainly by the recognition of the fair value adjustment to the restructured liabilities included in the JRP. In 2018 the main tax effects from permanent deductions arising from the recognition of the restructuring of the liabilities included in the JRP.

(iii)

Refers to the reversal (recognition) of the allowance for the realizable value (impairment) of deferred tax assets (Note 10).

(iv)

Refers to the effects of unrecognized deferred tax assets held by foreign subsidiaries that do not have a history of profitability and/or an expectation to generate taxable income.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

7.8.

CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS

Short-termCash investments made by the Company and its subsidiaries forin the years ended December 31, 20182019 and 20172018 are measured at their fair values.

 

(a)

Cash and cash equivalents

 

  2018   2017   2019   2018 

Cash

   287,491    277,500 

Cash and banks

   575,863    287,491 

Cash equivalents

   4,097,838    6,585,184    1,506,082    4,097,838 
  

 

   

 

 

Total

   4,385,329    6,862,684    2,081,945    4,385,329 
  

 

   

 

 

 

  2018   2017   2019   2018 

Repurchase agreements(i)

   2,742,731    6,225,547    1,192,708    2,742,731 

Private securities

    

Bank certificates of deposit (CDBs)

   301,632    348,318 

Certificated of Bank Deposit (CDB)

   173,854    301,632 

Private securities(ii)

   134,818    895,073 

Time deposits

   154,514    1,307    1,096    154,514 

Other

   3,888    10,012    3,606    3,888 
  

 

   

 

 

Cash equivalents

   4,097,838    6,585,184    1,506,082    4,097,838 
  

 

   

 

 

 

(b)

Short-term and long-term investments

 

  2018   2017   2019   2018 

Private securities

   213,653    114,839 

Private securities(iii)

   196,203    213,653 

Government securities

   25,309    21,447    21,589    25,309 
  

 

   

 

 

Total

   238,962    136,286    217,792    238,962 
  

 

   

 

 

Current

   201,975    21,447    183,850    201,975 

Non-current

   36,987    114,839    33,942    36,987 

(i)

Represented mainly by exclusive investment funds composed by Government Securities with yield pegged to the SELIC rate. The portfolio is preferably allocated to highly liquid spot market instruments for all investments.

(ii)

Represented mainly by financial treasury bills from private banks with remuneration linked to CDI rate and immediate liquidity.

(iii)

Represented mainly by the investments with yield pegged to the SELIC and CDB rates.

The Company and its subsidiaries hold short-termcash investments in Brazil and abroad for the purpose of earning interest on cash, benchmarked to CDI in Brazil, LIBOR for the US dollar-denominated portion, and EURIBOR for the euro-denominated portion.

The amounts of cash equivalents and short-term investments are basically invested through exclusive investment funds, and most of the portfolio consists of Government Securities with yield pegged to the SELIC rate. The portfolio is preferably allocated to highly liquid spot market instruments for all investments.

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

8.9.

TRADE ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE NET

 

  2018   2017   2019 2018 

Billed services

   6,783,022    7,478,145    5,910,643  5,699,817 

Unbilled services

   984,062    634,241    842,726  984,062 

Mobile handsets and accessories sold

   619,821    597,267 

Provision for bad debt

   (1,870,350   (1,342,211
  

 

   

 

 

Handheld devices, accessories, and other assets

   354,928  619,821 

Subtotal

   7,108,297   7,303,700 

Expected losses on trade receivables

   (773,771 (787,145

Total

   6,516,555    7,367,442    6,334,526   6,516,555 
  

 

   

 

 

The aging list of trade receivables is as follows:

 

  2018   2017   2019   2018 

Current

   6,250,613    6,096,205    5,118,874    5,167,408 

Past-due up to 60 days

   672,673    919,421    527,459    672,673 

Past-due from 61 to 90 days

   131,798    144,818    104,694    131,798 

Past-due from 91 to 120 days

   132,562    130,633    99,299    132,562 

Past-due from 121 to 150 days

   104,628    128,175    83,083    104,628 

Over 150 dayspast-due

   1,094,631    1,290,401    1,174,888    1,094,631 
  

 

   

 

 

Total

   8,386,905    8,709,653    7,108,297    7,303,700 
  

 

   

 

 

The movements in the allowance for doubtful accounts wereexpected credit losses on trade receivables are as follows:

 

Balance in 2016at January 1, 2018

   (1,084,895547,485

Provision for bad debtExpected losses on trade receivables

   (777,106843,681

Trade receivables written off as uncollectible

   519,790

976,998
 

Balance in 2017IFRS 9 adoption (*)

   (1,342,211372,977

Provision for bad debtBalance at December 31, 2018

   (1,216,658787,145

Expected losses on trade receivables

(488,269

Trade receivables written off as uncollectible

   688,519

501,643
 

Balance in 2018at December 31, 2019

   (1,870,350773,771

(*)

Impact of the first-time recognition, at January 1, 2018, of IFRS 9 as a contra entry to Accumulated losses in Shareholders’ equity.

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

9.10.

RECOVERABLE INCOME TAX AND DEFERRED TAXES

(a) Tax rate reconciliation

Income taxes encompass the income tax and the social contribution in Brazil. The income tax rate is 25% and the social contribution rate is 9%, an aggregate nominal tax rate of 34%. Income tax expense attributable to income (loss) from continuing operations was an income tax benefit of R$347,139 for the year ended December 31, 2018, an income tax benefit of R$350,987 for the year ended December 31, 2017, and an income tax expenses of R$2,245,113 for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Income tax (expense) benefit attributable to income from continuing operations consists of:

   2018   2017   2016 

Income tax and social contribution

      

Current tax (expense)

   115,706    (906,080   (712,814

Deferred tax (expense) benefit

   231,433    1,257,067    (1,532,299
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   347,139    350,987    (2,245,113
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The tax rate reconciliation from continuing operation consists of the following:

   2018   2017   2016 

Income (loss) before taxes (i)

   27,046,698    (4,378,648   (13,434,629
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income tax and social contribution

      

Income tax and social contribution at statutory rate (34%)

   (9,195,877   1,488,740    4,567,774 

Valuation allowance (ii)

   (4,367,062   (1,134,511   (4,048,859

Effect of foreign tax rate differential

     (23,063   (12,574

Tax effects of nondeductible expenses (iii)

   (652,940   (92,831   (2,892,381

Tax effects oftax-exempt income (iii)

   14,564,537    373,321    121,546 

Tax incentives (basically, operating income) (iv)

   3,068    14,007    21,121 

Tax amnesty program (v)

     (274,529   —   

Other

   (4,587   (147   (1,740
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income tax and social contribution effect on profit or loss

   347,139    350,987    (2,245,113
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial Reorganization – Debtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

(i)

At December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 income (loss) before income taxes and income tax (expense) benefit for continuing operations is as follows: ASSETS

 

   2018 
   Brazil   Foreign operations  Total 

Income (loss) before income taxes

   37,559,050    (10,512,352  27,046,698 

Income tax benefit

   343,082    4,057   347,139 

Current tax income (expense)

   164,050    (48,344  115,706 

Deferred tax income benefit

   179,031    52,402(*)   231,433 
   ASSETS 
  2019   2018 

Current recoverable taxes

    

Recoverable income tax (IRPJ) (i)

   209,513    287,472 

Recoverable social contribution (CSLL) (i)

   81,215    91,996 

IRRF/CSLL—withholding income taxes (ii)

   251,998    241,778 

Total current

   542,726    621,246 

Deferred recoverable taxes

    

Income tax and social contribution on temporary differences1

   99,175    23,050 

Totalnon-current

   99,175    23,050 

 

(*)

The amount of R$ 52,402 is related to the Tax effect of the entities classified asheld-for-sale.

   LIABILITIES 
  2019   2018 

Current taxes payable

    

Income tax payable

   54,358    21,628 

Social contribution payable

   12,296    5,398 

Total current

   66,654    27,026 

 

   2017 
   Brazil   Foreign operations  Total 

Loss before income taxes

   (3,115,832   (1,262,816  (4,378,648

Income tax benefit

   311,895    39,092   350,987 

Current tax (expense)

   (893,031   (13,049  (906,080

Deferred tax income benefit

   1,204,926    52,141(*)   1,257,067 

(*)

The amount of R$ 52,141 is related to the Tax effect of the entities classified asheld-for-sale.

   2016 
   Brazil   Foreign operations   Total 

Loss before income taxes

   (12,402,406   (1,032,223   (13,434,629

Income tax (expense)

   (2,054,234   (190,879   (2,245,113

Current tax (expense)

   (521,773   (191,041   (712,814

Deferred tax income (expense) benefit

   (1,532,461   162    (1,532,299

(ii)

Refers to the increase in the valuation allowance related to the deferred tax assets in 2018, 2017, and 2016.

(iii)

The maintax-exempt income refers to the novation of the debt obligations and other liabilities due to the effects of the Reorganization Judicial Plan, primarily as a result of the present value adjustments in the initial recognition date. The main effects of nondeductible expenses refers to the reduction of the fair value of Unitelheld-for-sale investment, which is not tax deductible in the amount of R$166 million (R$90 million in 2017 and R$371 million in 2016).

(iv)

These tax incentives correspond mainly to a 75% reduction in the current tax due on operating income obtained as a result of telecommunication services rendered in certain northern and northeast regions of Brazil, where the Company holds facilities for the purpose of rendering those services. This tax benefit is usually granted for a 10 year period, limited up to January 1, 2024.

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial Reorganization – Debtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

(v)

Refers to a tax position taken in prior periods that were assessed by the taxing authorities. Although the Company believed in prior periods that these positions wouldmore-likely-than-not of being sustained, it was decided to adhere to PRORELIT and avoid substantial costs to keep on going discussions with government. PRORELIT program allowed taxpayers to settle federal tax debts accrued prior to June 30, 2015, excluding tax debts that are subject to tax installment payments.

In order to enroll, tax payers were requested to resign their litigation rights with respect to the settled debt amount and pay at least 30% of their outstanding consolidated tax debt accrued through June 30, 2015 in cash. The remaining 70% of the debt would be settled with tax loss carryforwards. Apart from the initial 30% down payment, no guarantees or collateral is needed.

The Company has submitted its application for PRORELIT to settle several tax debts. Nevertheless, tax authorities have a five years term to ratify the amounts of tax loss carryforwards utilized by taxpayers.

In 2017, the Company recognized in current tax the tax debts included in the Tax Compliance Program (PRT) and in the Special Tax Compliance Program (PERT).

(b) Significant components of current and deferred taxes

   ASSETS 
  2018   2017 

Current recoverable taxes

    

Recoverable income tax (IRPJ) (i)

   287,472    565,725 

Recoverable social contribution (CSLL) (i)

   91,996    135,348 

IRRF/CSLL - withholding income taxes (ii)

   241,778    422,437 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current

   621,246    1,123,510 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

   LIABILITIES 
  2018   2017 

Current taxes payable

    

Income tax payable

   21,628    416,080 

Social contribution payable

   5,398    151,049 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current

   27,026    567,129 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial Reorganization – Debtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

   2018   2017 

Deferred taxes assets and liabilities

    

Other temporary differences (iii)

   5,117,917    8,854,946 

Tax loss carryforwards (iv)

   13,703,530    5,752,241 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total deferred taxes assets

   18,821,447    14,607,187 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other intangibles

   (2,121,763   (2,428,128

Pension plan assets

   (249,796   (333,899

Other temporary differences (v)

   (790,534   (1,073,293
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total deferred tax liabilities

   (3,162,093   (3,835,320
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Valuation allowance (iii)

   (15,636,304   (11,269,242
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total deferred taxes, net

   23,050    (497,375
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

See movements table below

(i)

Refer mainly to prepaid income tax and social contribution that will be offset against federal taxes payable in the future.

(ii)

Refer to withholding income tax (IRRF) credits on cash investments, derivatives, intragroup loans, government entities, and other amounts that are used as deductions from income tax payable for the years, and social contribution withheld at source on services provided to government agencies.

(iii)

For the year ended December 31, 2018, total valuation allowance increased from R$11,269,242 (10,134,731 in 2016) to R$15,636,304, reflecting a net change in the valuation allowance totaling R$4,367,062 recognized for the companies that, as of December 31, 2018, do not expect to generate sufficient future taxable profits, based on consistent assumptions and timing used in the analysis of the potential impairment of long-lived assets and goodwill, against which tax assets could be offset. Most of deferred tax assets have been reduced by a valuation allowance to the amount supported by reversing taxable temporary difference. The deferred tax assets not offset by valuation allowance are dependent upon the generation of future pretax income in certaintax-paying components in Brazil that have a history of profitability and an expectation of continued profitability. Management believes it is more likely than not that the results of future operations will generate sufficient taxable income to realize the deferred tax assets that are not subject to the valuation allowance. However, deferred income tax assets can be reduced in the near term if estimates of future taxable income during the carryforward period are reduced.

(iv)

The tax loss carryfowards in Brazil and foreign subsidiaries is approximately R$29,692,453 and R$14,432,380, and corresponding to R$10,095,435 and R$3,608,095 of deferred tax assets, respectively, which do not expire, and may be carried forward indefinitely. The Company can offset their tax loss carryforwards against taxable income up to a limit of 30% per year, pursuant to the prevailing tax law.

(v)

Refer mainly the tax effects of foreign exchange liabilities, monetary variations of judicial deposits and tax incentives.

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

Movements in deferred income tax and social contribution

   Balance at
December 31, 2018
  Recognized
in deferred
tax benefit/
expenses
  Recognized
directly in
equity
  Add-backs/
Offsets
   Balance at
December 31, 2019
 

Deferred tax assets arising on:

       

Temporary differences

       

Provisions

   1,244,246   (68,999     1,175,247 

Provisions for suspended taxes

   29,555   134,999      164,554 

Provisions for pension funds and impacts of (IAS 19 R)

   (14,095  (3,341  3,331     (14,105

Expected losses on trade receivables

   478,827   (46,407     432,420 

Profit sharing

   94,504   (13,185     81,319 

Foreign exchange differences

   1,403,193   333,740      1,736,933 

Merged goodwill (i)

   1,690,508   (278,759     1,411,749 

Other temporary add-backs and deductions

   177,085   773,610   2,557     953,252 

Onerous obligation

   1,527,924   449,900      1,977,824 

Deferred taxes on temporary differences

   6,631,747   1,281,558   5,888     7,919,193 

CSLL tax loss carryforwards

   13,703,529   1,033,425   25,095   38    14,762,087 

Total deferred tax assets

   20,335,276   2,314,983   30,983   38    22,681,280 

Deferred tax liabilities

       

Temporary differences and income tax and social contribution of goodwill (ii)

   (2,532,682  235,338      (2,297,344

Allowance for impairment loss (iii)

   (17,779,544  (2,474,234  (30,983    (20,284,761

Total deferred tax assets (liabilities)

   23,050   76,087(*)    38    99,175 

(*)

The expenses on deferred taxes disclosed in Note 6 include R$7,046 in deferred taxes of foreign operations classified asheld-for-sale assets.

(i)

Refer to: (i) deferred income tax and social contribution assets calculated as tax benefit originating from the goodwill paid on acquisition of the Company and recognized by the merged companies in the course of 2009. The realization of the tax credit arises from the amortization of the goodwill balance based on the STFC license and in the appreciation of property, plant and equipment, the utilization of which is estimated to occur through 2025, and (ii) deferred income tax and social contribution assets originating from the goodwill paid on the acquisition of interests in the Company in 2008-2011, recognized by the companies merged with and into Telemar Participações S.A. (“TmarPart”) and by TmarPart merged with and into the Company on September 1, 2015, which was based on the Company’s expected future profitability and the amortization of which is estimated to occur through 2025.

(ii)

Refers basically to the tax effects on the appreciation of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets, merged from TmarPart.

(iii)

The Company, based on the schedule of expected generation of future taxable income, supported by a technical feasibility study and the comparison with the estimate of the annual realization amount of asset and liability temporary differences, revised its deferred taxes recovery estimate and identified and recognized an allowance at recoverable amount.

The stock of tax loss carryforwards in Brazil and foreign subsidiaries is approximately R$32,805,092 and R$14,433,424, and corresponds to R$11,153,731 and R$3,608,356 in deferred tax assets, respectively, which can be carried forward indefinitely and liabilities

The table below does not consideroffset against taxes payable in the roll forward of the deferred tax asset fromheld-for-sale companies:future.

 

   Balance at 2017  Recognized in
continuing operations
  Other
comprehensive
income
   Add-backs/
Offsets /
Transfer
  Balance at 2018 

Deferred tax assets arising on:

       

Temporary differences

       

Provision for contingencies

   4,235,797   (2,961,996     1,273,801 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

   693,315   (214,488     478,827 

Profit sharing

   101,993   (7,489     94,504 

Foreign exchange differences

   1,062,308   340,885      1,403,193 

Other temporary differences

   1,107,660   41,889     (972,464  177,085 

License

   1,653,873   (231,860    268,494   1,690,507 

Tax loss carryforwards

       

Tax loss carryforwards

   5,752,241   7,923,539     27,750   13,703,530 
  

 

 

  

 

 

    

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total deferred taxes assets

   14,607,187   4,890,480     (676,220  18,821,447 
  

 

 

  

 

 

    

 

 

  

 

 

 

Other intangibles

   (2,428,128  306,365      (2,121,763

Pension plan assets

   (333,899  (228,283  312,386     (249,796

Other temporary differences

   (1,073,293  (422,469    705,228   (790,534
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total deferred tax liabilities

   (3,835,320  (344,387  312,386    705,228   (3,162,093
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Valuation allowance

   (11,269,242  (4,367,062     (15,636,304
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total net deferred tax

   (497,375  179,031   312,386    29,008   23,050 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

   Balance at 2016   Recognized in
continuing operations
  Other
comprehensive
income
   Add-backs/
Offsets (*)
   Balance at 2017 

Deferred tax assets arising on:

         

Temporary differences

         

Provision for contingencies

   3,827,131    408,666       4,235,797 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

   654,624    38,691       693,315 

Profit sharing

   22,304    79,689       101,993 

Foreign exchange differences

   1,062,308    —         1,062,308 

Other temporary differences

   2,037,477    (383,604      1,653,873 

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

License

   1,246,117   (138,457     1,107,660 

Tax loss carryforwards

       

Tax loss carryforwards

   4,956,994   1,853,701     (1,058,454  5,752,241 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total deferred taxes assets

   13,806,955   1,858,686   —      (1,058,454  14,607,187 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Other intangibles

   (2,707,265  279,137      (2,428,128

Pension plan assets

   (316,060  (49,996  32,157     (333,899

Other temporary differences

   (1,324,904  251,611      (1,073,293
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total deferred tax liabilities

   (4,348,229  480,752   32,157     (3,835,320
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Valuation allowance

   (10,134,731  (1,134,511  —       (11,269,242
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total net deferred tax

   (676,005  1,204,927   32,157    (1,058,454  (497,375
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

(*)

This year offsets relates to the tax debts included in the Tax Compliance Program (PRT) and in the Special Tax Compliance Program (PERT), as it was possible to convert some amount of tax loss carryforwards into tax credits in order to offset part of the debts paid under the rules of such Programs, in the amount of R$1,035 million and R$21 million, respectively (Note 18). R$ 208,642 refers to the utilization of tax loss carryfowards for Income Tax and R$ 849,812 refers to utilization of tax loss carryfowards fornon-income tax.

10.11.

OTHER TAXES

 

  ASSETS   ASSETS 
2018   2017  2019   2018 

Recoverable State VAT (ICMS) (i)

   1,240,353    1,411,538    1,301,684    1,240,353 

Taxes on revenue (PIS and COFINS)

   215,860    244,853 

PIS and COFINS (ii)

   2,736,009    215,860 

Other

   63,015    52,754    47,257    63,015 
  

 

   

 

 

Total

   1,519,228    1,709,145    4,084,950    1,519,228 
  

 

   

 

 

Current

   803,252    1,081,587    1,089,391    803,252 

Non-current

   715,976    627,558    2,995,559    715,976 

 

  LIABILITIES   LIABILITIES 
2018   2017  2019   2018 

State VAT (ICMS) (i)

   556,693    610,847    526,618    556,693 

ICMS Agreement No. 69/1998

   34,113    22,595 

Taxes on revenue (PIS and COFINS) (ii)

   235,319    184,472 

FUST/FUNTTEL/broadcasting fees (iii)

   655,022    963,259 

Other (iv)

   181,437    530,153 
  

 

   

 

 

ICMS Convention No. 69/1998

   220,467    34,113 

PIS and COFINS (iii)

   574,063    235,319 

FUST/FUNTTEL/broadcasting fees (iv)

   669,193    655,022 

Other (v)

   120,460    181,437 

Total

   1,662,584    2,311,326    2,110,801    1,662,584 
  

 

   

 

 

Current

   1,033,868    1,443,662    886,763    1,033,868 

Non-current

   628,716    867,664    1,224,038    628,716 

 

(i)

Recoverable ICMS arises mostly from prepaid taxes and credits claimed on purchases of property, plant and equipment, which can be offset against ICMS payable within 48 months, pursuant to Supplementary Law 102/2000.

(ii)

Refers, basically,The Company and its subsidiaries filed legal proceedings to claim the Social Integration Program Tax on Revenue (PIS)right to deduct ICMS from the PIS and Social Security Funding Tax on Revenue (COFINS) on revenue, financial income,COFINS tax bases and other income.the recovery of past unduly paid amounts, within the relevant statute of limitations.

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial Reorganization – Debtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

The Company and its subsidiaries have filed legal proceedings to claim the right to deduct ICMS from the PIS and COFINS tax bases and the recovery of past unduly paid amounts, within the relevant statute of limitations.

In March 2019, the 1st and 2nd Region Federal Courts (Brasília and Rio de Janeiro) issued final and unappealable decisions favorable to the Company on two of the three main lawsuits of the Company relating to the discussion about thenon-levy of PIS and COFINS on ICMS.

The third lawsuit is still ongoing in the 2nd Region Federal Court.

The total adjusted amount of theseThese credits at December 31, 2018, considering the three lawsuits, is approximately R$3.05 billion. The taw lawsuits on which a final decision was issued total approximately R$2.05 billion.

In order to initiate the utilization of the tax credits recognized by the courts by offsetting them against federal taxes due, the Company is conducting a thorough analysis aimed at quantifying these tax credits and taking the actions necessary to secure their confirmationwere cleared for offset by the Federal Revenue Service.

Service between May and October 2019 so that the Company has been using them to pay federal taxes due since June 2019. The total amount of the credit was approximately R$3 billion, added to the three lawsuits.

(iii)

Refers basically to the Social Integration Program Tax on Revenue (PIS) and Social Security Funding Tax on Revenue (COFINS) on revenue, financial income, and other income.

(iv)

The Company and its subsidiaries Telemar and Oi Móvel filed lawsuits to discuss the correct calculation of the contribution to the FUST and in the course of the lawsuits made escrow deposits to suspend its collection. These discussions are also being judged by higher courts and a possible transformation of the deposited amounts into definitive payments should not occur within two (2) yearsyears.

(iv)(v)

Consisting primarily of monetary variationcorrections to suspended taxes and withholding tax on intragroup loans and interest on capital.

 

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

11.12.

JUDICIAL DEPOSITS

In some situations the Company makes, as ordered by courts or even at its own discretion to provide guarantees, judicial deposits to ensure the continuity of ongoing lawsuits. These judicial deposits can be required for lawsuits with a likelihood of loss, as assessed by the Company based on the opinion of its legal counselors, as probable, possible, or remote.

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial Reorganization – Debtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes The Company recognizes in current assets the expected amount to be redeemed from judicial deposits or to offset judicial deposits against the Financial Statements

provision for contingencies in the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

next fiscal year.

As set forth by relevant legislation, judicial deposits are adjusted for inflation.monetary correction.

 

  2018   2017   2019 2018 

Civil

   5,849,978    6,948,344    5,027,848  5,849,978 

Tax

   2,337,508    2,660,132    2,301,986  2,337,508 

Labor

   1,197,144    1,637,668    883,125  1,197,144 

Subtotal

   9,384,630    11,246,144 
  

 

   

 

 

Provision for losses (i)

   (649,910   (1,933,034
  

 

   

 

 

Subtotal:

   8,212,959  9,384,630 

Estimated loss (i)

   (47,112 (649,910

Total

   8,734,720    9,313,110    8,165,847  8,734,720 
  

 

   

 

 

Current

   1,715,934    1,023,348    1,514,464  1,715,934 

Non-current

   7,018,786    8,289,762    6,651,383  7,018,786 

 

(i)

This amount represents the estimated loss of balances of judicial deposits, thatwhich are in the process of reconciliation with the obtained statements.

 

12.13.

PREPAID EXPENSES

   2019   2018 

Costs incurred on the performance of a contract (IFRS 15)

   1,016,337    912,538 

Advertising and publicity

   55,695    135,049 

Bank guarantee

   31,297    40,690 

Insurance

   25,807    48,865 

Contractual prepaid expenses

     47,771 

Other

   124,944    81,590 

Total

   1,254,080    1,266,503 

Current

   670,344    743,953 

Non-current

   583,736    522,550 

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

14.

OTHER ASSETS

   2019   2018 

Advances to and amounts recoverable from suppliers

   767,900    621,376 

Amounts receivable from the sale of property, plant and equipment items

   302,947    305,155 

Amounts receivable

   53,406    202,834 

Advances to employees

   79,830    69,635 

Other

   85,739    131,532 

Total

   1,289,822    1,330,532 

Current

   852,155    1,079,670 

Non-current

   437,667    250,862 

15.

INVESTMENTS

 

  2018   2017   2019   2018 

Joint venture

   31,488    42,346 

Joint arrangements

   28,632    31,488 

Investments in associates

   44,124    42,115    48,578    44,124 

Tax incentives, net of allowances for losses

   31,876    31,579    31,876    31,876 

Other investments

   10,352    20,470    24,679    10,352 
  

 

   

 

 

Total

   117,840    136,510    133,765    117,840 
  

 

   

 

 

Summary of the movements in investment balances

 

Balance at 2016

135,652

Share of profits of subsidiaries

(433

Associates’ share of other comprehensive income

1,949

Other

(658

Balance at 2017January 1, 2018

   136,510 

Share of profitsresults of subsidiariesinvestees

   (13,492

Associates’ shareShare of other comprehensive incomesubsidiaries’ and associates’ equity in investees

   (2,270

Reclassification of equity in investees to held-for-sale assets

5,491

Other

   (2,9088,399

Balance at December 31, 2018

   117,840 

Share of results of investees

  (5,174

Subsidiaries’ and associates’ share of other comprehensive income

2,469

Reclassification of equity in investees to held-for-sale assets

3,514

Other

15,116

Balance at December 31, 2019

133,765 

 

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

13.16.

PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

 

   Works in
progress
  Automatic
switching
equipment
  Transmission
and other
equipment (i)
  Infrastructure  Buildings  Other assets  Total 

Cost of PP&E (gross amount)

 

Balance at 2016

   2,413,770   19,974,446   56,720,433   27,568,591   4,311,533   5,866,031   116,854,804 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Additions

   4,661,570   2,060   375,050   268,931   17,906   55,614   5,381,131 

Write-offs

   (93,922  (2,235  (19,656  (666,885  (821  (31,193  (814,712

Transfers

   (3,547,305  33,016   1,875,594   1,170,165   141,666   326,864   —   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at 2017

   3,434,113   20,007,287   58,951,421   28,340,802   4,470,284   6,217,316   121,421,223 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Additions

   5,117,872   487   372,138   388,988   10,721   39,471   5,929,677 

Write-offs

   (47,465  (1,827  (53,374  (601,842  (4,660  (3,567  (712,735

Transfers

   (5,152,907  68,518   2,672,783   2,214,139   (15,168  212,635   —   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at 2018

   3,351,613   20,074,465   61,942,968   30,342,087   4,461,177   6,465,855   126,638,165 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Accumulated depreciation

        

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial Reorganization – Debtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

Balance at 2016

     (18,267,700  (43,324,619  (21,665,423  (2,547,638  (4,969,592  (90,774,972
    

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   Works in
progress
 Automatic
switching
equipment
 Transmission
and other
equipment (1)
 Infrastructure Buildings Right of
use -
leases
 Other
assets
 Total 

Cost of PP&E (gross amount)

         

Balance at January 1, 2018

   3,434,113  20,008,955  59,082,061  28,341,491  4,471,481   6,217,467  121,555,568 

Additions

   5,117,872  487  383,088  388,988  10,721   39,471  5,940,627 

Write-offs

   (47,465  (45,211 (601,087 (3,344  (3,403 (700,510

Transfers

   (5,152,907 68,518  2,672,783  2,214,139  (15,168  212,635  

Balance at December 31, 2018

   3,351,613  20,077,960  62,092,721  30,343,531  4,463,690   6,466,170  126,795,685 

Initial adoption of IFRS 16

       8,167,932   8,167,932 

Contractual changes

       520,809   520,809 

Additions

   6,870,257   226,022  295,795  5,054  283,494  96,435  7,777,057 

Write-offs

   (104,781  (61,464 (1,059,118  (136,734 (421 (1,362,518

Transfers

   (7,958,762 135,576  5,076,356  2,463,974  39,025   243,831  

Transfer to held-for-sale assets

     (50,854 (271,292   (322,146

Reclassified from held-for-sale assets

        781  781 

Balance at December 31, 2019

   2,158,327  20,213,536  67,333,635  31,993,328  4,236,477  8,835,501  6,806,796  141,577,600 

Accumulated depreciation

         

Balance at January 1, 2018

   (18,648,010)  (45,677,425)  (22,230,047)  (2,758,012)   (5,253,427)  (94,566,921) 

Depreciation expenses

     (338,003 (2,175,732 (1,158,457 (96,940 (396,589 (4,165,721   (292,524 (2,251,574 (1,246,471 (90,348  (407,396 (4,288,313

Write-offs

     1,158  18,610  558,879  817  23,458  602,922     40,387  442,589  215   1,921  485,112 

Transfers

     —    (473 (625 (84,895 85,995  2    (36 (151 (353 33,570   (33,030 
    

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at 2017

     (18,604,545  (45,482,214  (22,265,626  (2,728,656  (5,256,728  (94,337,769
    

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2018

   (18,940,570)  (47,888,763)  (23,034,282)  (2,814,575)   (5,691,932)  (98,370,122) 

Depreciation expenses

     (299,925 (2,271,906 (1,253,099 (95,679 (408,379 (4,328,988   (271,449 (2,519,706 (1,456,608 (101,432 (952,225 (247,836 (5,549,256

Write-offs

     1,834  48,582  443,347  1,542  2,085  497,390     53,452  979,614   22,315  (7,514 1,047,867 

Transfers

     (36 (151 (353 33,568  (33,028  —      85  (565 (787 776   491  
    

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at 2018

     (18,902,672  (47,705,689  (23,075,731  (2,789,225  (5,696,050  (98,169,367
    

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Property, plant and equipment, net

         

Balance at 2016

   2,413,770    1,706,746   13,395,814   5,903,168   1,763,895   896,439   26,079,832 
  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at 2017

   3,434,113    1,402,742   13,469,207   6,075,176   1,741,628   960,588   27,083,454 
  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at 2018

   3,351,613    1,171,793   14,237,279   7,266,356   1,671,952   769,805   28,468,798 
  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Transfer to held-for-sale assets

     16,267  189,198    205,465 

Reclassified from held-for-sale assets

        (720 (720

Balance at December 31, 2019

   (19,211,934)  (50,355,582)  (23,495,796)  (2,726,033)  (929,910)  (5,947,511)  (102,666,766) 

PP&E, net

         

Balance at December 31, 2018

   3,351,613  1,137,390  14,203,958  7,309,249  1,649,115   774,238  28,425,563 

Balance at December 31, 2019

   2,158,327  1,001,602  16,978,053  8,497,532  1,510,444  7,905,591  859,285  38,910,834 

Annual depreciation rate (average)

     11 10 8 8 12    10%  12%  10%  9%  11%  15%  
    

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

(i)(1)

Transmission and other equipment includesinclude transmission and data communication equipment.

Additional disclosures

Pursuant to ANATEL’s concession agreements, allthe property, plant and equipment items capitalized byof the CompanyConcessionaires that are indispensable for the provision of the services granted underSwitched Fixed-line Telephony Services (“STFC”) provided for in said agreements are considered returnable assets and are part of the concession’s cost. These assets are handed over to ANATEL upon the termination of the concession agreements that are not renewed.assets.

As at December 31, 2018,2019, the residual balance of the Company’s returnable assets is R$9,048,877 (R$8,218,006 in 2018) and consists of assets and installations in progress, switching and transmission equipment, payphones, outside network equipment, power equipment, and systems and operation support equipment.

In the year ended December 31, 2019, financial charges and transaction costs incurred on works in progress were capitalized at the average rate of 7% per year.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

Movements in the rights of use—leases

   Towers  Physical
space
  Stores  Vehicles  Real
estate
  Total 

Balance January 1, 2019

       

Initial adoption of IFRS 16

   7,353,507   521,523   117,480   93,615   81,807   8,167,932 

Contractual changes

   500,690   6,614   6,680    6,825   520,809 

Additions

   65,559   29,008   13,555   174,455   917   283,494 

Write-offs

   (35,836  (82,091  (8,701  (8,804  (1,302  (136,734

Balance at December 31, 2019

   7,883,920   475,054   129,014   259,266   88,247   8,835,501 

Accumulated depreciation

       

Balance at January 1, 2019

       

Depreciation expenses

   (737,439  (92,896  (31,456  (70,787  (19,647  (952,225

Write-offs

   13,176   3,967   1,580   3,028   564   22,315 

Balance at December 31, 2019

   (724,263)   (88,929)   (29,876)   (67,759)   (19,083)   (929,910) 

Right of use, net

       

Balance at January 1, 2019

       

Balance at December 31, 2019

   7,159,657   386,125   99,138   191,507   69,164   7,905,591 

 

14.17.

INTANGIBLE ASSETS

 

  Intangibles in
progress
 Data processing
systems
 Regulatory
licenses (i)
 Other Total   Intangibles
in progress
 Data
processing
systems
 Regulatory
licenses
 Other Total 

Cost of intangibles (gross amount)

 

Balance at 2016

   112,842   8,301,630   19,076,941   1,971,826   29,463,239 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Cost of intangible assets (gross amount)

      

Balance at January 1, 2018

   17,047  8,743,013  18,602,742  1,812,090  29,174,892 

Additions

   263,305  4,524   73,471  341,300 

Write-offs

   (14    (14

Transfers

   (253,143 234,157   18,986  

Balance at December 31, 2018

   27,195  8,981,694  18,602,742  1,904,547  29,516,178 

Additions

   332,500  4,356   74,972  411,828    369,695  8,402   44,248  422,345 

Transfers

   (428,295 438,138   (9,843    (384,526 410,487   (25,961 

Other

   (1,111  (382 (1,493
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at 2017

   17,047   8,743,013   19,076,941   2,036,573   29,873,574 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Additions

   263,305  4,524   —    73,471  341,300 

Transfers

   (253,143 234,157   —    18,986   —   

Other

   (14  —     —     —    (14
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at 2018

   27,195   8,981,694   19,076,941   2,129,030   30,214,860 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2019

   12,364  9,400,583  18,602,742  1,922,834  29,938,523 

Accumulated amortization

            

Balance at 2016

    (7,148,833  (10,071,364  (1,731,983  (18,952,180
   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at January 1, 2018

   (7,673,193)  (11,559,717)  (1,591,297)  (20,824,207) 

Amortization expenses

   (443,268 (900,360 (108,139 (1,451,767

Impairment loss expenses (see Note 5 (iii))

    (291,758  (291,758

Balance at December 31, 2018

   (8,116,461)  (12,751,835)  (1,699,436)  (22,567,732) 

Amortization expenses

   (524,414 (1,025,438 (116,756 (1,666,608   (381,874 (772,179 (107,851 (1,261,904

Transfers

   53    53    8   (8 
   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance at 2017

    (7,673,194  (11,096,802  (1,848,739  (20,618,735
   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Amortization expenses

   (443,268 (1,001,234 (126,181 (1,570,683

Impairment loss expenses (see Note 5 (iii))

    (2,111,022  (2,111,022

Balance at December 31, 2019

   (8,498,327)  (15,635,036)  (1,807,295)  (25,940,658) 

Intangible assets, net

      

Balance at December 31, 2018

   27,195  865,233  5,850,907  205,111  6,948,446 

Balance at December 31, 2019

   12,364  902,256  2,967,706  115,539  3,997,865 

Annual amortization rate (average)

   20 20 23 

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

Transfers

     —     —     —     —   
    

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at 2018

     (8,116,462  (12,098,036  (1,974,920  (22,189,418
    

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Intangible assets, net

       

Balance at 2016

   112,842    1,152,797   9,005,577   239,843   10,511,059 
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at 2017

   17,047    1,069,819   7,980,139   187,834   9,254,839 
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at 2018

   27,195    865,232   6,978,905   154,110   8,025,442 
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Annual amortization rate (average)

     20  10  16 
    

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

(i)

Includes mainly the fair value of intangible assets related to purchase of control of BrT (now Oi, S.A.).

15.18.

TRADE PAYABLES

 

   2018   2017 

Infrastructure, network and plant maintenance materials

   2,861,712    2,658,436 

Services

   3,397,413    3,964,912 

Rental of polls andrights-of-way

   191,723    399,996 

ANATEL AGU

   7,147,137   

Other

   647,856    293,478 

Adjustment to present value

   (5,426,971  

Liabilities subject to compromise

     (2,145,852
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   8,818,870    5,170,970 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Current

   5,225,862    5,170,970 

Non-current

   3,593,008   

Trade payables subject to the Judicial Reorganization (i)

   3,794,610    246,472 

Trade payables not subject to the Judicial Reorganization

   5,024,260    4,924,498 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   8,818,870    5,170,970 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Certain amounts initially recorded as liabilities subject to compromise (Note 29) were adjusted and reclassified to reflect the new legal terms and conditions established by the JRP Court.

   2019  2018 

ANATEL (*)

   7,572,101   7,147,137 

Services

   3,423,011   3,397,413 

Infrastructure, network and plant maintenance materials

   2,607,888   2,861,712 

Rental of polls and rights-of-way

   118,966   191,723 

Other

   289,508   647,856 

Adjustment to present value (**)

   (5,124,107  (5,426,971

Total

   8,887,367   8,818,870 

Current

   5,593,940   5,225,862 

Non-current

   3,293,427   3,593,008 

Trade payables subject to the Judicial Reorganization

   4,093,058   3,794,610 

Trade payables not subject to the Judicial Reorganization

   4,794,309   5,024,260 

Total

   8,887,367   8,818,870 

 

16.(*)

Refers for prepetition claims of the Management Regulatory Agency of the Federal Attorney General’s Office (AGU) to be settle pursuant to the JRP (see Note 24).

(**)

The calculation takes into consideration the contractual flows provided for in the JRP, discounted using rate from 16.4% per year to 17,2% per year, considering the maturities of each liabilities (ANATEL and other trade payables).

19.

DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

   2019   2018 

Liabilities

    

Non-deliverable Forward (NDF) contracts

   1,152   

Total

   1,152   

Current

   1,152   

20.

BORROWINGS AND FINANCING

As a result of the JRP confirmation, the borrowingsBorrowings and financing contracted by the Oi Group companies were novated and the related balances were recalculated according to the JRP terms and conditions, in accordance with the measures necessary for its implementation and booked as current andnon-current liabilities.

The Company and the other Oi Group completed the financial debt restructuring with the implementation of the applicable terms and conditions provided for in the JRP.type

 

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial Reorganization – Debtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

Balances of borrowings and financing as at December 31, 2018 are as follow:

2018Contractual maturity
PrincipalInterest

Senior notes

7,068,263

Local currency

Foreign currency

7,068,263Jul 2025Semiannual

Non-qualified bondholders (*)

326,376
Aug 2024 to
Feb 2030

Semiannual

Collateralized claims

3,616,074

BNDES

3,616,074
Mar 2024 to
Feb 2033

Monthly

Restructuring I

14,993,376

Local currency

8,640,054

Debentures (I)

6,788,519
Aug 2023 to
Feb 2035

Semiannual

Other

1,851,535
Aug 2023 to
Feb 2035

Semiannual

Foreign currency

6,353,322

Local currency Financial Institution

54,251
Jan 2019 to
Dec 203

Monthly

Overall Offer

4,332,352

Local currency

207,035
Feb 2038 to
Feb 2042


Single
installment

Foreign currency

4,125,317
Feb 2038 to
Feb 2042

Loan and debentures from subsidiaries (Note 27)

Subtotal

30,390,692

Incurred debt issuance cost

(12,126

Present value adjustment (*)

(13,928,660

Total

16,449,906

Current

672,894

Non-current

15,777,012
   2019  2018  Contractual maturity 
  Principal   Interest 

Foreign currency Senior Notes

   6,980,817   7,068,263   Jul 2025    Semiannual 

Public debentures

   7,110,737   6,788,519   Aug 2023 to Feb 2035    Semiannual 

Financial institutions

      

Local currency

      

BNDES

   3,947,137   3,616,074   Mar 2024 to Feb 2033    Monthly 

Other

   2,071,209   1,905,786   Jan 2020 to Feb 2035    Monthly and semiannual 

Foreign currency

   6,725,591   6,353,322   Aug 2023 to Feb 2035    Semiannual 

Foreign currency multilateral financing

   360,161   326,376   Aug 2024 to Feb 2030    Semiannual 

Default payment

      

Local currency

   207,035   207,035   Feb 2038 to Feb 2042    Single installment 

Foreign currency

   4,239,168   4,125,317   Feb 2038 to Feb 2042   

Subtotal

   31,641,855   30,390,692    

Incurred debt issuance cost

   (13,911  (12,126   

Debt discount (*)

   (13,401,195  (13,928,660   

Total

   18,226,749   16,449,906    

Current

   326,388   672,894    

Non-current

   17,900,361   15,777,012    

 

(*)

The financial liabilities have been adjusted to present value according to the criteria of ASC 852 as of the time at which it has reclassified each of the financial liabilities that were legally affected by the JRP from liabilities subject to compromise to borrowings and financings or trade payables. It was calculated takingcalculation takes into consideration the contractual flows provided for in the JRP, discounted using rates that range from 12.6% per year to 16.4% per year, depending on the maturities and currency of each instrument, the resulting discount will be amortized to financial expense over the term of the debt.instrument.

Debt breakdown per currency

2018

Euro

198,931

US dollar

8,617,835

Brazilian reais

7,633,140

Total

16,449,906

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

Debt issuance costs by type

   2019   2018 

Financial institutions

   13,306    11,481 

Public debentures

   605    645 

Total

   13,911    12,126 

Current

   1,404    1,290 

Non-current

   12,507    10,836 

Debt breakdown perby currency

   2019   2018 

Euro

   311,309    198,931 

US dollar

   9,209,982    8,617,835 

Brazilian reais

   8,705,458    7,633,140 

Total

   18,226,749    16,449,906 

Debt breakdown by index

 

  

Index/rate

  2018   Index/rate   2019   2018 

Fixed rate

  1.75% p.a. – 10.00% p.a.   8,562,117    1.75% p.a. – 10.00% p.a.    9,078,998    8,562,117 

CDI

  0.75% p.a. – 1.83% p.a.   3,949,639    80% CDI    4,694,687    3,949,639 

TJLP

  2.95% p.a. + TJLP   3,614,820    2.95% p.a. + TJLP    3,945,972    3,614,820 

TR

  0%   14,430    0% p.a.    22,662    14,430 

Other

  0%   308,900    0% p.a.    484,430    308,900 
    

 

 

Total

     16,449,906      18,226,749    16,449,906 
    

 

 

Maturity schedule of the long-term debt and debt issuance costs allocation schedule

 

  2018   Long-term debt   Debt discount   Debt issuance costs 
  Long-term debt   2019 

2020

   10,958 

2021

   3,953    3,953    887,351    1,811 

2022

   970    970    887,351    1,811 

2023

   295,155    313,181    887,351    1,811 

2024 and following years

   29,405,472 
  

 

 

2024

   773,745    884,980    1,811 

2025 and thereafter

   30,222,214    9,854,162    5,263 

Total

   29,716,508    31,314,063    13,401,195    12,507 
  

 

 

Guarantees

BNDES financing facilities are originally collateralized by receivables of the Company and its subsidiaries Telemar and Oi Móvel. The Company provides guarantees to its subsidiaries Telemar and Oi Móvel for such financing facilities, totaling R$2,7122,937 million.

Covenants

Pursuant to a Clause 17 of Appendix 4.2.4 to the Plan, theThe Company and its subsidiaries are subject to certainsome covenants existing in somecertain loan and financing agreements, based on certain financial ratios, including the Grossdebt-to-EBITDA.debt-to-EBITDA ratio. The Company monitors on a quarterly basis these terms and conditions of the covenants and the terms and conditions for the periodyear ended December 31, 2018,2019, the Company and its subsidiaries were compliant with all relevant covenants of the agreements.

 

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

Failure to comply with these financial ratios might result in the accelerated maturity of the debt balance due. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and the high foreign exchange volatility, the Company initiated talks with its creditors and has successfully obtained a waiver on March 30, 2020, eliminating, therefore, any concern of possibly triggering consequences of a failure to comply with certain covenants in the first quarter of 2020.

Changes in borrowings and financing

   2018  Interest,
monetary
corrections, and
exchange
differences
  Amortization
of debt
discount
   Principal
and
interest
payment
  Tax and
other
payments
  Transfers
and other
  2019 

Borrowings and financing

   30,390,692   2,253,793     (935,243  (171,962  104,575   31,641,855 

Debt discount

   (13,928,660  (334,269  910,491      (48,757  (13,401,195

Incurred debt issuance cost

   (12,126       (1,785  (13,911
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   16,449,906   1,919,524   910,491    (935,243)   (171,962)   54,033   18,226,749 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The Company made the interest payments of the Qualified Bonds, which do not have a grace period for the interest, in August 2019.

17.21.

LICENSES AND CONCESSIONS PAYABLE

 

  2018   2017   2019   2018 

Personal Mobile Services - SMP

   1,025    4,649 

Personal Mobile Services (SMP)

   58,582    29,530 

STFC concessions

   84,594    16,261      56,089 
  

 

   

 

 

Total

   85,619    20,910    58,582    85,619 
  

 

   

 

 

Current

   85,619    20,306    58,582    85,619 

Non-current

     604 

Correspond to the amounts payable to ANATEL for the radiofrequency concessions and the licenses to provide the SMP services, obtained at public auctions, and STFC service concessions, obtained at public auctions.concessions.

22.

LEASES PAYABLE

2019

Towers

7,373,373

Physical space

403,485

Stores

103,792

Real estate

72,719

Vehicles

196,657

Total

8,150,026

Current

1,510,097

Non-current

6,639,929

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

Movements in leases payable

 

18.

Balance at January 1, 2018

Initial adoption of IFRS 16

8,167,932

New contracts

237,575

Cancellations

(127,699

Interest

958,573

Payments

(1,611,273

Contractual changes

524,918

Balance at December 31, 2019

8,150,026

Maturity of long-term lease payments

2021

   1,501,799 

2022

   1,414,630 

2023

   1,307,923 

2024

   1,253,069 

2025 to 2029

   4,882,027 

2030 and thereafter

   3,613,174 

Total

   13,972,622 

Interest

   (7,332,693

Non-current

   6,639,929 

The present value of leases payable was calculated, based on a projection of future fixed payments, which do not take into consideration the projected monetary correction, discounted using discount rates that range from 10.79% to 12.75% p.a.

Contracts not recognized as leases payable

The Company elected not to recognize a leased not to recognize a lease liability for short-term leases (leases with expected period of 12 months or less) or leases of low value assets. As at December 31, 2019, the payments made under such leases were recognized in profit or loss and amounted to R$78,134. Additionally, the Company also recognized in profit or loss the amount R$7,966, related to variable lease payments.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

23.

TAX FINANCINGREFINANCING PROGRAM

The outstanding balance of the Tax Debt Refinancing Program is broken down as follows:

 

  2018   2017   2019   2018 

Law 11941/09 and Law 12865/2013 tax financing program

   496,240    638,409    417,076    496,240 

REFIS II - PAES

     4,336 

PRT (MP 766/2017) (i)

   54,528    233,051      54,528 

PERT (Law 13496/2017) (ii)

   2,438    12,981    427    2,438 
  

 

   

 

 

Total

   553,206    888,777    417,503    553,206 
  

 

   

 

 

Current

   142,036    278,277    86,721    142,036 

Non-current

   411,170    610,500    330,782    411,170 

The amounts of the tax refinancing program created under Law 11941/2009, Provisional Act (MP) 766/2017, and Law 13469/2017, divided into principal, fine and interest, which include the debt declared at the time the deadline to join the program (Law 11941/2009 installment plan) was reopened as provided for by Law 12865/2013 and Law 12996/2014, are broken down as follows:

 

  2018   2017   2019   2018 
Principal   Fines   Interest   Total   Total   Principal   Fines   Interest   Total   Total 

Tax on revenue (COFINS)

   42,921      156,674    199,595    299,533    2,718      151,072    153,790    199,595 

Income tax

   5,873      39,094    44,967    68,285    1,317      36,678    37,995    44,967 

Tax on revenue (PIS)

   44,043      35,842    79,885    89,954    36,785      35,242    72,027    79,885 

Social security (INSS – SAT)

   1,018    1,342    2,414    4,774    8,450    650    371    2,018    3,039    4,774 

Social contribution

   754    323    11,426    12,503    17,339    580    22    10,713    11,315    12,503 

Tax on banking transactions (CPMF)

   19,014    2,142    28,976    50,132    49,268    18,950    2,137    29,486    50,573    50,132 

PRT – Other Debts - RFB

   26,685    2,374    25,469    54,528    227,261 

PRT – Social Security - INSS

           5,790 

PERT – Other Debts - RFB

   1,146      1,292    2,438    12,981 

PRT – Other debts—RFB

           54,528 

PERT – Other debts—RFB

   240      187    427    2,438 

Other

   29,150    4,433    70,801    104,384    109,916    12,137    4,314    71,886    88,337    104,384 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   170,604    10,614    371,988    553,206    888,777    73,377    6,844    337,282    417,503    553,206 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

The payment schedule is as follows:

 

2019

   142,036 

2020

   85,070    86,718 

2021

   85,070    86,292 

2022

   85,070    86,292 

2023

   85,070    86,292 

2024 e 2025

   70,890 
  

 

 

2024

   71,909 

Total

   553,206    417,503 
  

 

 

The tax debts, as is the case of the debts included in tax refinancing programs, are not subject to the terms of the judicial reorganization terms.

 

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

(i)

Tax Compliance Program (PRT)

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial Reorganization – Debtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

The Company elected to include and settle under said tax refinancing program, created by the Federal Government, under Provisional Act 766/2017 (PRT), the administrative proceedings with a probable likelihood of an unfavorable outcome and those where, while attributed a possible likelihood of an unfavorable outcome, the cost effectiveness of including them provided to be highly advantageous in light of the benefits offered by the program.

The Company elected the payment method that allows settling 76% of the consolidated debt utilizing tax credits arising on tax loss carryforwards amounting to R$1,035 million, and paid the remaining 24% in 24 monthly installments totaling R$327 million plus SELIC interest charged as from the adherence month. All the procedures necessary for the Company joiningto join the PRT were completed within the statutory deadline, while MP 766/2017 was still in effect.

Subsequently, on June 1, 2017 the effective period of said Provisional Act ended because it was not passed into law within the relevant constitutional deadline. However, as established by the Federal Constitution, the legal relationships established and arising from actions taken while a provisional act not passed into law was effective, as in the case of the Company’s joining the PRT, continue to be governed by the former provisional act, except where the National Congress provides for otherwise, by means of a legislative decree.

Note that the PRT, governed by MP 766/2017, is not equivalent to the tax installment plan established by MP 783/2017 (PERT), of May 31, 2017, because of differences in payment terms and conditions, plan scope, and access requirements.

 

(ii)

Special Tax Compliance Program (PERT)

The Company elected to include in and settle through PERT only tax debts that in aggregate do not exceed the fifteen million Brazilian reais (R$15,000,000.00) ceiling set by Article 3 of Law 13496/2017.

The tax debts included in said program were those being disputed at the administrative level in proceedings classified with a low likelihood of the Company winning and which, in the event of an unfavorable outcome, would result in a lawsuit—and entail all the associated costs—, the reason why the cost effectiveness of joining the program was quite positive, because of the benefits offered by PERT (especially the payment of just 5% of the debt in cash).

 

19.

PROVISION FOR CONTINGENCIES

   2018   2017 

Labor

   1,457,181    697,190 

Tax

   650,083    660,304 

Civil (i)

   2,931,456    10,941 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total provisions

   5,038,720    1,368,435 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Current

   680,542   

Non-current

   4,358,178    1,368,435 

(i) Includes R$157,809 related to the agreement entered into with Pharol, as described in Note 30.

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

24. PROVISIONS

Balance breakdown

 

   

Type

  2019   2018 
  Labor    
(i)  

Overtime

   855,722    602,673 
(ii)  

Indemnities

   299,096    187,499 
(iii)  

Sundry premiums

   221,743    166,963 
(iv)  

Stability/reintegration

   215,449    160,442 
(v)  

Additional post-retirement benefits

   108,827    94,691 
(vi)  

Salary differences and related effects

   101,573    61,674 
(vii)  

Lawyer/expert fees

   51,193    30,898 
(viii)  

Severance pay

   38,261    31,521 
(ix)  

Labor fines

   30,399    25,921 
(x)  

Employment relationship

   18,758    15,952 
(xi)  

Severance Pay Fund (FGTS)

   13,306    10,804 
(xii)  

Joint liability

   3,100    889 
(xiii)  

Other claims

   93,605    67,254 
  Total   2,051,032    1,457,181 
  Tax    
(i)  

State VAT (ICMS)

   746,481    503,332 
(ii)  

Tax on services (ISS)

   69,208    76,389 
(iii)  

INSS (joint liability, fees, and severance pay)

   23,847    23,100 
(iv)  Real Estate Tax (IPTU)   150,223   
(v)  

Other claims

   61,189    47,262 
  Total   1,050,948    650,083 
  Civil    
(i)  

ANATEL

   570,283    580,182 
(ii)  

Corporate

   397,946    1,124,037 
(iii)  

Small claims courts

   118,910    191,839 
(iv)  

Other claims(1)

   1,062,561    1,035,398 
  Total   2,149,700    2,931,456 
  Total provisions   5,251,680    5,038,720 
  Current   547,996    680,542 
  Non-current   4,703,684    4,358,178 

(1)

In 2018, includes R$157,809 related to the agreement entered into with Pharol, as described in Note 1 – Litigation Termination Settlement between the Company and Pharol, settled in the first quarter of 2019.

In compliance with the relevant Law applicable for Labor, Tax and Civil proceedings, the provisionslawsuit are adjusted for inflationmonetary correction on a monthly basis.

The following summarizesbasis, considering the activity of the contingency provision:monetary correction indexes applicable in court instances, composed mainly by IGPM, TR and SELIC rates.

 

   Labor   Tax   Civil   Total 

Balance in 12/31/2016

   543,026    576,133    9,915    1,129,074 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Monetary variation (i)

   162,695    99,902    1,914    264,511 

Additions/(reversals) (i)

   92,803    49,616    1,098    143,517 

Write-offs for payment/terminations (ii)

   (101,334   (65,347   (1,986   (168,667
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance in 12/31/2017

   697,190    660,304    10,941    1,368,435 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Monetary variation (i)

   22,244    77,697    19,072    119,013 

Additions/(reversals) (i)

   (57,200   (49,659   133,465    26,606 

Write-offs for payment/terminations (ii)

   (241,225   (38,259   (378,339   (657,823

Reclassification from liabilities subjected to compromise

   1,036,172      3,146,317    4,182,489 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance in 12/31/2018

   1,457,181    650,083    2,931,456    5,038,720 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

Summary of movements in provision balances

   Labor  Tax  Civil  Total 

Balance at January 1, 2018

   1,596,418   660,302   5,526,414   7,783,134 

Monetary correction (i)

   184,112   77,697   (34,939  226,870 

Additions/(reversals) (i)

   99,805   (49,659  42,734   92,880 

Write-offs for payment/terminations (i)

   (423,154  (38,257  (2,602,753  (3,064,164

Balance at December 31, 2018

   1,457,181   650,083   2,931,456   5,038,720 

Monetary correction (ii)

   485,049   60,688   1,074,641   1,620,378 

Additions/(reversals) (ii)

   316,182   1,002,827   (1,102,571  216,438 

Write-offs for payment/terminations

   (207,380  (666,563  (753,826  (1,627,769

Reclassified from held-for-sale assets

    3,913    3,913 

Balance at December 31, 2019

   2,051,032   1,050,948   2,149,700   5,251,680 

 

(i)

The Company has been continually monitoring its proceedings, as well as the reprocessing of the provision estimation model taking into account the new profile and history of discontinuation of lawsuits in the context of the approval and Ratification of the JRP. Accordingly, the Company reversed the provision for contingencies and the related monetary variation.

(ii)

This line item basically includes the amounts related to proceedings terminated and included in the list of the Company’s judicial reorganization creditors, which were transferred to the line item trade payables and will be paid according to the terms of the JRP.

(ii)

The Company continuously monitors its proceedings and revised the calculation methodology of provision estimates, taking into consideration the new profile and history of legal proceeding terminations, in the context of the JRP, as well as in the assessment of the risk of loss carried out by Management supported by its legal advisors.

Summary of the main matters related to the recognized provisions and contingent liabilities

Provisions

Labor

The Company is a party to a large number of labor lawsuits and calculates the related provision based on a statistical methodology that takes into consideration, but not limited to, the total number of existing lawsuits, the claims make in each lawsuit, the amount claimed in each lawsuit, the history of payments made, and the technical opinion of the legal counsel.

 

(i)

Overtime - Overtime—refers to the claim for payment of salary and premiums by alleged overtime hours;

 

(ii)

Indemnities—refers to amounts allegedly due for occupational accidents, leased vehicles, occupational diseases, pain and suffering, and tenure;

(iii)

Sundry premiums - premiums—refer to claims of hazardous duty premium, based on Law 7369/85, regulated by Decree 93412/86,Article 193 of the Brazilian Labor Code (CLT), due to the alleged risk from employees’ contact with the electric power grid, health hazard premium, pager pay, and transfer premium;premium.

(iii)

Indemnities - refers to amounts allegedly due for occupational accidents, leased vehicles, occupational diseases, pain and suffering, and tenure;

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial Reorganization – Debtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

(iv)

Stability/reintegration - reintegration—claim due to alleged noncompliance with an employee’s special condition which prohibited termination of the employment contract without cause;

 

(v)

Supplementary retirement benefits - benefits—differences allegedly due on the benefit salary referring to payroll amounts;

 

(vi)

Salary differences and related effects - effects—refer mainly to claims for salary increases due to alleged noncompliance with trade union agreements. As for the effects, these refer to the impact of the salary increase allegedly due on the other amounts calculated based on the employee’s salary;

 

(vii)

Lawyers/expert fees - fees—installments payable to the plaintiffs’ lawyers and court appointed experts, when necessary for the case investigation, to obtain expert evidence;

 

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

(viii)

Severance pay - pay—claims of amounts which were allegedly unpaid or underpaid upon severance;

 

(ix)

Labor fines - fines—amounts arising from delays or nonpayment of certain amounts provided for byin the employment contract, within the deadlines set out in prevailing legislation and collective bargaining agreements;

 

(x)

Employment relationship - relationship—lawsuits filed by outsourced companies’ former employees claiming the recognition of an employment relationship with the Company or its subsidiaries by alleging an illegal outsourcing and/or the existence of elements that evidence such relationship, such as direct subordination;

 

(xi)

Supplement to FGTS fine - fine—arising from understated inflation, refers to claims to increase the FGTS severance fine as a result of the adjustment of accounts of this fund due to inflation effects.

The Company filed a lawsuit against Caixa Econômica Federal to assure the reimbursement of all amounts paid for this purpose;

 

(xii)

Joint liability - liability—refers to the claim to assign liability to the Company, filed by outsourced personnel, due to alleged noncompliance with the latter’s labor rights by their direct employers;

 

(xiii)

Other claims - claims—refer to different litigation including rehiring, profit sharing, qualification of certain allowances as compensation, etc.

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial Reorganization – Debtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

Tax

The provisions for tax lawsuits are calculated individually taking into consideration Management and the legal counsel’s risk assessment. These contingencies are not included in the Judicial Reorganization Plan.

 

(i)

ICMS - ICMS—Refers to the provision considered sufficient by management to cover the various tax assessments related to: (a) levy of ICMS and not ISS on certain revenue; (b) claim and offset of credits on the purchase of goods and other inputs, including those necessary for network maintenance; and (c) tax assessments related to alleged noncompliance with accessory obligations.

 

(ii)

ISS - ISS—the Company and TMAR have provisions for tax assessment notices challenged because of the levy of ISS on several value added, technical, and administrative services, and equipment leases.

 

(iii)

INSS - INSS—Provision related basically to probable losses on lawsuits discussing joint liability and indemnities.

 

(iv)

IPTU – Provision related to entries that refer to the collection of IPTU (municipal property tax) levied by several different municipalities where the Company owns properties.

(v)

Other claims – claims—Refer basically to provisions to cover Real Estate Tax (IPTU) assessments and several tax assessments related to the collection of income tax and social contribution collection.

Civil

 

(i)

ANATEL – On June 30, 2016 the Company was a party to noncompliance administrative proceedings and lawsuits filed by ANATEL and the Federal Attorney General’s Office (AGU) totaling an estimate R$14.5 billion, which were included in the JRP as electable for payment as provided for in this Plan (see Note 1).Plan. On this date, R$8.4 billion in liquid proceedings and R$6.1 billion in illiquid proceedings.

With regard to the proceedings included in the JRP and taking into consideration the decision that granted the judicial reorganization on February 5, 2018, the Company revised the criteria used to calculate the provision for these regulatory contingencies to start considering the estimate of discounted future cash flows associated to each one of the payment methods provided for in the JRP for this type of claims. As at December 31, 2018,2019, this provision totals R$580570 million.

For the contingencies not subject to the judicial reorganization, the Company takes into consideration the individual management of each noncompliance event, based on opinions of outside attorneys when evaluatingattorneys.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the outcomeConsolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of the contingencies.Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

The Company disagrees and is challenging some of the alleged noncompliance events, and is also challenging the unfairness and unreasonableness of the amount of imposed fines in light of the pinpointed noncompliance event and has kept in balance sheet the amount it deems a probable loss.

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial Reorganization – Debtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

The JRP prescribes in a specific clause how regulatory agencies’ claims should be addressed. It should be notedis worth mentioning that said Plan was approved by a vast majority of creditors at the General Creditors’ Meeting and ratified by the by the 7th Corporate Courtpart of the Rio de Janeiro State Courtamount recognized in December 2017, related to ANATEL was transferred to Trade Payables (see Note 18) as part of Justice.the recognitions resulting from the JRP. Note also that ANATEL filed bill of reviewNo. 001068-32.2018.8.19.0000 against the decision that ratifies the JRP alleging that Clause 4.3.4, which prescribes the payment method of this agency’s claims, is null and void. This bill of review was denied by the 8th8th Civil Chamber of the Rio de Janeiro State Court of Justice, which will still judgehave been sent to the motions for clarification3rd Vice President of the Court to decide on whether the Special and Extraordinary Appeals filed by ANATEL against the said decision.decision are admissible. In addition the 7th7th Corporate Court of the Rio de Janeiro State Court of Justice issued a decision establishing that withdrawal of the judicial deposit made by Telemar to settle the first six (6)twelve (12) installments to repay ANATEL’s claim, as provided for byin the JRP. As the maturity date of the seventh light of establish drew closer,JRP and, on June 28, 2019, Oi filed a petition requestingnew request, under the usesame standards of the same settlement procedure forprecisions requests, to repay the following six (6)13th and 18th installments (from the seventh to the tenth installments) of ANATEL’s claim. It is worth mentioning that part of the amount recognized in December 2017 related to ANATEL was transferred to accounts payable(non-current) as part of the recognitions resulting from the JRP.ANATEL’s claim.

 

(ii)

Corporate – Financial Participation Agreements: these agreements were governed by Administrative Rules 415/1972, 1181/1974, 1361/1976, 881/1990, 86/1991, and 1028/1996. When they entered into a financial participation agreement to acquiredacquire a telephone line, subscribers became holders of a financial interest in the concessionaire after paying in a certain amount, initially recorded as capitalizable funds and subsequently recorded in the concessionaire’s equity, after a capital increase was approved by the shareholders’ meeting, thus generating the issuance of shares. The lawsuits filed against the former CRT - CRT—Companhia Riograndense de Telecomunicações, a company merged by the Company, and other local carriers members of the Telebrás system, challenge the way shares were granted to subscribers based on said financial participation agreements.

The Company used to recognize a provision for the risk of unfavorable outcome in these lawsuits based on certain legal doctrine. DuringIn 2009 however, decisionsthe Superior Court of Justice issued by appellate courtsan Abstract—ruling that summarizes the majority understanding of a court on given matter—that led the Company to revisitrevise its assessment of the amount accrued and the level of risk classification ofattributed to the relevant lawsuits.lawsuits that discuss the matter. The Company, considering obviously the peculiarities of each decision and based on the assessment made by its legal department and outside legal counsel, changed its estimate on the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome from possible to probable. In 2009, the Company’s management, based on the opinions of its legal department and outside legal counsel, revised the measurement criteria of the provision for contingencies related to the financial interest agreements. Said revision contemplated additional considerations regarding the dates and the arguments of the final and unappealable decisions on ongoing lawsuits, as well as the use of statistical criteria to estimate the amount of the provision for those lawsuits. TheBased on a methodology prepared with the support of itsin-house and outside consultants, currently the Company currently accrues these amounts mainlyprovides for the lawsuits discussing this matter taking into consideration (i)primarily, for purposes of calculating the criteria above, (ii)amounts involved in the lawsuits within or the lawsuits out of the statute of limitations period, the following variables: (i) the number of ongoing lawsuits by matter discussed, (iii)without payment; (ii) the average amount of historical losses, broken down by matter in dispute,historic losses; (iii) the average number of court settlements; and (iv) the impactseffects of the payment ofpaying these contingencies inunder the context of the Judicial Reorganization Planjudicial reorganization ratified on January 8, 2018. In addition to these criteria, in 2013 the courts recognized, in several decisions, the enforcement of the twenty-year statute of limitationsSpecifically for the lawsuits that met this criterion andfor which settlements were reached in the Company, based onmediation of illiquid amounts, the opinion of itsin-house and outside legal counsel, understands that the likelihood of lossamount is remote. Therefore, it is not necessary to set up a provision.

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial Reorganization – Debtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

considered settled.

At the end of 2010, the website of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ) disclosed news that this court had set compensation criteria to be adoptedfollowed by the Company to the benefit of the shareholders of the former CRT for those cases new shares, possibly due, could not be issued because of the sentence issued. According to this court judgment news, which does not correspond to a final decision, theThe criteria must be based on (i) the definition of the number of shares that each claimant would be entitled, measuring the capital invested at the book value of the share reported in CRT’s monthly trial balance on the date it waspaid-in, (ii) after said number of shares is determined, it must be multiplied by its quotation on the stock exchange at the closing of the trading day the final and unappealable decision is issued, when the claimant becomes entitled to sell or disposed of the shares, and (iii) the result obtain must be adjusted for inflationmonetary correction (IPC/INPC) from the trading day of the date of the final and unappealable decision, plus legal interest since notification. In the case of succession, the benchmark amount will be the stock market price of the successor company.

Based on current information, management believes that itsthe new profile and history of the termination of the judicial processes, in the context of the JRP, and, using the loss risk assessment, Management adjusted the estimate would not be materially impacted as at December 31, 2018. Thereof the provisioning made in 2019. In addition, there may be however, significant changes in the items above, mainly regarding the market price of Company shares.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

(iii)

Small claims courts - courts—claims filed by customers for whom the individual indemnification compensation amounts do not exceed the equivalent of forty (40) minimum wages; and

The Company is a party to a large number of lawsuits filed in small claims courts and calculates the related provision based on a statistical methodology that takes into consideration, but not limited to, the total number of existing lawsuits, the claims make in each lawsuit, the amount claimed in each lawsuit, the history of payments made, and the technical opinion of the legal counsel and the impacts of the Judicial Reorganization Plan.Plan ratified on January 8, 2018.

 

(iv)

Other claims - claims—refer to several of ongoing lawsuits discussing contract terminations, certain agencies requesting the reopening of customer service centers, compensation claimed by former suppliers and building contractors, in lawsuits filed by equipment vendors against Company subsidiaries, revision of contractual terms and conditions due to changes introduced by a plan to stabilize the economy, and litigation mainly involving discussions on the breach of contracts.

The provisions for these contingencies are calculated individually taking into consideration Management and the legal counsel’s risk assessment.

Breakdown of contingent liabilities, per nature

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial Reorganization – Debtor-in-PossessionThe breakdown of contingent liabilities with a possible unfavorable outcome and, Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)therefore, not recognized in accounting, is as follows:

 

Breakdown of unrecorded contingent liabilities

The table below shows a summary of the carrying amounts of the main legal matters with possible risk of loss and the amounts on December 31, 2018 and 2017.

  2019   2018 
  2018   2017 

Labor

   770,982    53,328    797,927    770,982 

Tax

   27,586,094    26,175,239    28,416,097    27,586,094 

Civil

   1,723,110    191,819    1,667,900    1,723,110 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   30,080,186    26,420,386    30,881,924    30,080,186 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Contingent liabilities

The Company isand its subsidiaries are also partyparties to several lawsuits in which the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome is classified as possible, in the opinion of their legal counsel, and for which no provision for contingent liabilities has been recognized.

The main contingencies classified with possible likelihood of an unfavorable outcome, according to the Company´s management’s opinion, based on its legal counsel’s assessment, are summarized below:

Labor

Refer to several lawsuits claiming, but not limited to, the payment of salary differences, overtime, hazardous duty and health hazard premium, and joint liability.liability, which total approximately R$797,927 (R$770,982 in 2018).

Tax

The main ongoing lawsuits have the following matters:

 

(i)

ICMS - ICMS—it refers to discussions concerning the levy of this tax on certain activities and/or the provision of certain services, such as, for example, the levy of ICMS on noncore activities, supplemental services, services provided totax-exempt customers, subscriptions minimum contract period, or even the disallowance of tax credits because some States qualify them as undue, including, but not limited to, tax credits of capital assets, different calculation of the tax credit ratio (CIAP), totaling approximately R$13,470,008 (R$12,523,402 (R$11,730,162 in 2017).2018);

 

(ii)

ISS – alleged levy of this tax on subsidiary telecommunications services and discussion regarding the classification of the services taxed by the cities listed in Supplementary Law 116/2003, amounting approximately to R$3,286,248 (R$3,505,366 (2017 - R$3,387,630)in 2018);

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

(iii)

INSS – tax assessments to add amounts to the contribution salary allegedly due by the Company, amounting approximately to R$649,803 (R$695,249 (R$573,619 in 2017)2018); and

 

(iv)

Federal taxes - taxes—several tax assessment notifications regarding basically the disallowances made on the calculation of taxes, errors in the completion of tax returns, transfer of PIS and COFINS and FUST related to changes in the interpretation of these taxes tax bases by ANATEL. These lawsuits amount approximately to R$11,010,038 (R$10,862,077 (R$10,483,828 in 2017)2018).

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial Reorganization – Debtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

Civil

The main ongoing lawsuits do not have any court decision thatwhich has been issued, and are mainly related, but not limited to, challenging of network expansion plans, compensation for pain and suffering and material damages, collection lawsuits, and bidding processes. These lawsuits total approximately R$1,667,900 (R$1,723,110 in 2018).

Fenapas – Federação Nacional das Associações de Aposentados, Pensionistas e Participantes em Fundo de Pensão do Setor de Telecomunicações - civil actions filed with the 5th Corporate Court of Rio de Janeiro, against, in addition to Sistel,SISTEL, the Company and other operators, aiming at the annulment of thespin-off of the PBS pension plan, alleging, in brief “the breakdown of the Fundação Sistel supplementary pension fund scheme”, which resulted in several specific PBS mirror plans, and the corresponding allocations of funds from the technical surplus and the tax contingency existing at the time of thespin-off. The amount of potential lossinvolved cannot be estimated and it is not possible to settle the claims because they are unenforceable since this would require handing back the spun off net assets of SistelSISTEL related to telecommunications operators belonging to the former Telebrás system.

Guarantees

The Company has bank guarantee letters and guarantee insurance granted by several financial institutions and insurers to guarantee commitments arising from lawsuits, contractual obligations, and biddings with ANATEL. The adjusted amount of contracted bonds and guarantee insurances, effective at December 31, 20182019 corresponds to R$11,909,901 (R$13,750,739 (R$14,847,243 in 2017)2018). The commission charges on these contracts are based on market rates.

 

20.25.

OTHER PAYABLES

 

  2018   2017   2019   2018 

Onerous obligation (i)

   5,817,130    4,493,894 

Unearned revenues (ii)

   1,704,420    1,916,570 

Provisions for indemnities payable

   676,984    607,559    640,661    676,984 

Third party consignment

   56,302    35,293 

Advances from customers

   313,163    215,228 

Consignment to third parties

   41,249    56,302 

Provision for asset decommissioning

   17,410    16,716    18,101    17,395 

Other

   510,865    392,832    404,455    510,867 
  

 

   

 

 

Total

   1,261,561    1,052,400    8,939,179    7,887,240 
  

 

   

 

 

Current

   629,939    469,214    1,405,013    1,381,919 

Non-current

   631,622    583,186    7,534,166    6,505,321 

 

21.(i)

UNEARNED REVENUESThe Company and its subsidiaries are parties to a telecommunications signals transmission capacity supply agreement using submarine cables that connect North America and South America, and also hires the supply of capacity of the space segment for the provision of the DTH TV service. Since (a) the agreement obligations exceed the economic benefits that are expected to be received throughout the agreement; and (b) the costs are unavoidable, the Company and its subsidiaries recognized, pursuant to IAS 37, an onerous obligation measured at the lowest of net output cost of the agreement brought to present value, in 2019, amounting to R$1.2 billion of the satellite transmission contract (DTH TV) and in 2018, amounting to R$4.5 billion of the transmission contract via submarine cables.

Refers to the amounts received in advance for the assignment of the right to the commercial operation and use of infrastructure assets that are recognized in revenues over the effective period of the underlying agreements and service installation fees that are recognized in revenue when the customers use the services.

(ii)

Refers to the amounts received a prepayment for the assignment of the commercial operation and the use of infrastructure assets that are recognized in revenue for the agreements’ effective period. Include also certification/installation rates of the service that are recognized in the revenue pursuant to the period that the services are used by the customers.

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

   2018   2017 

Unearned revenues of the infrastructure assets

   1,596,238    1,661,236 

Unearned revenues of service installation fees

   159,345    —  

Other

   160,987    111,592 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   1,916,570    1,772,828 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Current

   229,497    139,012 

Non-current

   1,687,073    1,633,816 

 

22.26.

SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

 

(a)

Share capital

The Capital Increase – Claim Capitalization of Credits amounting to R$10,600,097 with the issue of 1,514,299,6031,514,299 new book-entry, registered common shares without par value was ratified byapproved at the Board of DirectorsCompany’s Extraordinary Shareholders’ Meeting held on July 20,September 17, 2018. The fair value of the shares issued was R$11,613,980.

On October 28, 2018, the Company commenced the issuance and delivery of warrants and ADWs exercised by their holders and issued 115,913,355115,914 common shares. The process was concludedcompleted on January 4, 2019. The Subscription Warrants that werehad not been exercised on or prior toby January 2, 2019 have beenwere cancelled.

On January 25, 2019, the Company completed the capital increase provided for by the JRP (Capital Increase—New Funds), with the issue of 3,225,806,451 new common shares, and the issue of 272,148,705 new common shares for private placement aimed at the Backstop Investors, and the issue of 275,985 new common shares related to the Subscription Warrants, all registered, book-entry, and without par value. The capital increase attributed to the capital and the capital reserves was R$500,466 and R$3,837,009, respectively (Note 1).

Subscribed andpaid-in capital is R$32,538,937 (R$32,038,471 (R$21,438,374 in 2017)2018), represented by the following shares, without par value:

 

  Number of shares (in thousands)   Number of shares (in thousands) 
2018   2017  2019   2018 

Total capital in shares

        

Common shares

   2,298,247    668,034    5,796,478    2,298,247 

Preferred shares

   157,727    157,727    157,727    157,727 
  

 

   

 

 

Total

   2,455,974    825,761    5,954,205    2,455,974 
  

 

   

 

 

Treasury shares

        

Common shares

   32,030    148,282    30    32,030 

Preferred shares

   1,812    1,812    1,812    1,812 
  

 

   

 

 

Total

   33,842    150,094    1,842    33,842 
  

 

   

 

 

Outstanding shares

        

Common shares

   2,266,217    519,752    5,796,448    2,266,217 

Preferred shares

   155,915    155,915    155,915    155,915 
  

 

   

 

 

Total outstanding shares

   2,422,132    675,667    5,952,363    2,422,132 
  

 

   

 

 

CommonAs at December 31, 2019, the Company reported a loss for the year amounting to R$9,000,434. Pursuant to the Company’s management proposal, subject to the Annual Shareholders’ Meeting’s approval, loss for the year was fully absorbed by capital reserves.

The Company is authorized to increase capital, through a Board of Directors’ decision, either in common or preferred shares, until its share capital totals R$38,038,701,741.49, within the 2/3 legal cap of nonvoting shares in the case of issue of new nonvoting preferred shares.

By decision of the Shareholders’ Meeting or the Board of Directors, the Company’s share capital can be increased by capitalizing either retained earnings or prior reserves, allocated to this purpose by the Shareholders’ Meeting. Under these terms, a capitalization can be made without changing the number of shares.

Issued capital is represented by common and preferred shareholders have different rights in relation to dividends, voting rightsshares, without par value, and in case of liquidation, as determined bycapital increases there is not constraint to keep the Company’sby-laws. In this way, basic and diluted earnings per share were calculated based on the profitcurrent ratio between these two types of the period available for them.shares.

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

Basic and diluted earnings (losses) per shareBy decision of the Shareholders’ Meeting or the Board of Directors, preemptive rights over the issue of shares, subscription warrants, or convertible debentures can be suspended in the cases provided for by Article 172 of the Brazilian Corporate Law.

Basic

Basic earnings per share are calculated by dividingAt the Company’s Annual Shareholders’ Meeting held on April 26, 2019, it was approved the allocation of the profit attributable to the Company’s controlling shareholders, available to holders of common and preferred shares, by the weighted average number of common and preferred shares outstanding during the period.

Diluted

Diluted earnings per share are calculated by adjusting the weighted average number of outstanding common and preferred shares to presume the conversion of all diluted potential shares. The Company currently has no potential dilutive shares.

   2018   2017   2016 

Net income (loss) attributable to owners of the Company

   27,369,422    (3,736,518   (15,502,132

Net income (loss) allocated to common shares – basic and diluted

   24,525,692    (2,874,290   (11,924,904

Net income (loss) allocated to preferred shares – basic and diluted

   2,843,730    (862,228   (3,577,228

Weighted average number of outstanding shares

      

(in thousands of shares)

      

Common shares – basic and diluted

   1,344,686    519,752    519,752 

Preferred shares – basic and diluted

   155,915    155,915    155,915 

Net income (loss) per share (in Reais):

      

Common shares – basic and diluted

   18.24    (5.53   (22.94

Preferred shares – basic and diluted

   18.24    (5.53   (22.94

On January 16, 2019, the Company issued 1,530,457,356 common shares to holders of subscription rights. On January 21, 2019, the Company issued 91,080,933 common shares to holders of subscription rights that had requested subscriptions for excess common shares. On January 25, 2019, 1,604,268,162 New Common Shares were subscribed and paid in. This concluded the Capital Increase process, through the subscription and payment of all 3,225,806,451 New Common Shares issued as part of the Capital Increase – New Funds, representing a contribution of new funds for the Company totalingyear 2018, amounting to R$4,000,000,000.00. This transaction will have an impact on the earnings per share for the next fiscal year, as the current shareholders will be diluted.

(a)

Capital reserves

Capital reserves consist mainly of the Special Reserve on Merger that is represented by the corporate reorganizations primarily due24,591,140 to the corporate reorganization approved on February 27, 2012. In 2015, the increase in this reserve refers to net assets recorded that are related to the merger of TmarPart.

Restructured Senior Notes convertible into equity instruments:

In light of the new terms, the senior notes were settled by issuing the following:

We highlight below the main features of the securities that qualify as debt instrument (Note 1):

Common shares issued by Oi and currently held by PTIF;

New I Common Shares that will be due as a result of the capital increase, through the capitalization of the claims, New I Common Shares;

Subscription Warrants.

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial Reorganization – Debtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

For measurement purposes of the amount recognized for each of the transactions qualifiable as an equity instrument, referred to above, the Company hired an independent specialized consulting firm to estimate the fair value of the stock, using discounted cash flow valuation methodology (fair value hierarchy, Level 3), considering the following main assumptions: (i) variable discount rate: in reais (BRL) in nominal terms, according to the CAPM methodology, variable due toyear-on-year changes in debt / equity ratio ranging from 14.0% to 16.4%; (ii) terminal growth rate of 4.0% , according to long-term Brazilian inflation, projected by the Central Bank.

Fair Value of Restructured Senior Notes

New I Common Shares

10,070,116

Delivery of treasury shares

773,072

Subscription Warrants

770,792

11,613,980

In July 2018, the related new shares and treasury shares were delivered to the holders of Qualified Senior Notes, as provided for in the JRP.offset prior years’ accumulated losses.

 

(b)

Treasury shares

Delivery of treasury shares

On July 27, 2018, the Company delivered 116,251,405 common shares, previously held by PTIF, to the Qualified Bondholders, as part of the restructuring of the qualified bondsbonds. The fair value related to the conversion of the Senior Notes settled with the delivery of treasury shares of R$773,072. The treasury shares delivered were written off as a contra entry to capital reserves, amounting to R$2,727,842.

In February 2019, the Company bought back 1,800,000 preferred shares, in trades in the stock market, at a total cost of R$2,572 to ensure the compliance of the obligation assumed by the Company to transfer own shares held in treasury to shareholder Bratel, wholly-owned subsidiary da Pharol, in the context of the settlement entered into by both companies (Note 1).

In April 2019, due to confirmation of the settlement entered into by Oi and Pharol, 32,000,000 common shares and 1,800,000 preferred shares were delivered to Bratel, totaling 33,800,000 shares as provided for by the settlement entered into by the parties (Note 1).

(c)

Capital reserves

The carryingcapital reserves consist mainly of the reserves described below and according to the following practices:

Special merger goodwill reserve: represents the net amount of the derecognizedbalancing item to goodwill recorded in assets, as provided for by regulatory instruction.

Special merger reserve—net assets: represented by: (i) the net assets merged by the Company under the Corporate Reorganization approved on February 27, 2012; and (ii) the net assets merged with and into the Company upon the merger of TmarPart approved on September 1, 2015, pursuant to the provisions of regulatory instruction.

Other capital reserves: represented mainly by: (i) R$1,933,200 arising from the capitalization of the earnings reserves in February 2015; (ii) R$3,837,009 related to the capital increase with new funds, as mentioned in this Note, item (a); and (iii) R$2,462,799 related to the absorption of capital reserves, due to the delivery of treasury shares to Bratel, pursuant to the agreement entered into, as mentioned in this Note, item (b).

(d)

Share issuance costs

As mentioned in item (a) of this Note, under the commitment agreement entered into with the backstoppers, the Company issued 272,148,705 new common shares, as compensation for the commitments assumed in said agreement, at a cost of R$2,727,842,337,464, recognized in share issuance cost as a contra entry to the capital reserve.increase, plus R$86,180 related to expenses incurred in the issue process.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

(c)(e)

Other comprehensive incomeBasic and diluted earnings per share

On January 16, 2019, the Company issued 1,530,457,356 common shares to the holders of subscription warrants. On January 21, 2019, the Company issued 91,080,933 common shares to the holders of subscription rights that requested subscriptions of the excess common shares. On January 25, 2019, 1,604,268,162 New Common Shares were subscribed and paid in. The end of the capital increase process, through the subscription and payment of all 3,225,806,451 New Common Shares issued as part of the Capital Increase—New Funds, represented a contribution of new funds to the Company recognizestotaling R$4,000,000,000.00. This transaction had an impact on earnings per share, since the shareholders were diluted.

The common and preferred shareholders have different rights in this line item other comprehensive income,terms of dividends, voting rights, and liquidation, as prescribed by the Company’s bylaws. Accordingly, basic and diluted earnings (losses) per share were calculated based on profit (loss) for the year available to the common and preferred shareholders.

Basic

Basic earnings (loss) per share are calculated by dividing the profit attributable to the owners of the Company, available to common and preferred shareholders, by the weighted average number of common and preferred shares outstanding during the year.

Diluted

Diluted earnings (loss) per share are calculated by adjusting the weighted average number of outstanding common and preferred shares, to estimate the dilutive effect of all convertible securities. Currently the Company does not have any potentially dilutive shares.

The table below shows the calculations of basic and diluted earnings per share:

   2019  2018   2017 

Profit (loss) attributable to owners of the Company

   (9,000,434)   24,591,140    (6,365,019) 

Profit (loss) allocated to common shares - basic and diluted

   (8,764,803  22,036,074    (4,896,241

Profit (loss) allocated to preferred shares – basic and diluted

   (235,631  2,555,066    (1,468,778

Weighted average number of outstanding shares (in thousands of shares)

     

Common shares - basic and diluted

   5,788,447   1,344,686    519,752 

Preferred shares - basic and diluted

   155,615   155,915    155,915 

Profit (loss) per share (in reais):

     

Common shares - basic and diluted

   (1.51  16.39    (9.42

Preferred shares - basic and diluted

   (1.51  16.39    (9.42

Preferred shares will become voting shares if the Company does not pay minimum dividends to which includes actuarial gainspreferred shares are entitled under the Company’s Bylaws during three consecutive years.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and losses, foreign exchange differences arising on translatingSubsidiaries

Notes to the net investment in foreign subsidiaries, and the tax effects related to these components, which are not recognized in the statementConsolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of profit or loss.Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

23.27.

PROVISION FOR PENSION PLANEMPLOYEE BENEFITS

 

(a)

Pension fundsplans

The Company and its subsidiaries sponsor retirement benefit plans (“Pension Funds”) for their employees, ifprovided that they elect to be part of such plan.plan, and current beneficiaries. The table below shows the benefit plans existing pension plans at December 31, 2018.2019.

 

Benefit plans

  

Sponsors

  

Manager

TCSPREV

  Oi, Oi Móvel and BrT Multimídia  FATL
BrTPREV (*)

TelemarPrev

  Oi, Oi Móvel and BrT MultimídiaFATL
TelemarPrevOi, TMARTelemar and Oi Móvel  FATL

PAMEC

OiOi

PBS-A

Telemar e OiSISTEL

PBS-Telemar

  Telemar  FATL
PBS-TNCP

PBS-TNC

  Oi Móvel  FATL

CELPREV

  Oi Móvel  FATL
PAMECOiOi
PBS-ATelemar and OiSistel

PAMA

  Oi and Telemar  SistelSISTEL

 

(*)

Plan merged with into TCSPREV on November 30, 2018.

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial Reorganization – Debtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

SistelSISTEL – Fundação Sistel de Seguridade Social

FATL – Fundação Atlântico de Seguridade Social

ForWhenever mentioned in this Note, for purposes of the pension plans, described in this note, the Company canmay also be referred to as the “Sponsor”.

The sponsored plans are valued by independent actuaries at the end of the annual reporting period. For the year ended December 31, 2018,2019, the actuarial valuations were performed by PREVUE Consultoria. The Bylaws provide for the approval of the supplementary pension plan policy, and the joint liability attributed to the defined benefit plans is governedruled by the agreements entered into with the pension fund entities, with the agreement of the National Pension Plan Authority (PREVIC), as regards the specific plans. PREVIC is the official agency that approves and oversees said plans.

The sponsored defined benefit plans are closed to new entrants because they areclose-end pension funds. Participants’ and the sponsors’ contributions are defined in the funding plan.

Underfunded statusActuarial liabilities are recognized for the sponsored defined benefit plans that report an actuarial deficit. For the plans that report an actuarial surplus, assets are recorded when there is an express authorization for offsetting them against future employer contributions.

Provisions for pension plans

Refer to the recognition of the actuarial deficit of the defined benefit plans, as shown below:

 

   2018   2017 

Financial obligations - BrTPREV plan (i)

   574,725   

BrTPREV plan

     629,120 

PAMEC plan

   4,397    3,300 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total unfunded status

   579,122    632,420 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Reclassification to liabilities subject to compromise (Note 29).

     (560,046
    

 

 

 

Totalnon-current

   579,122    72,374 
    

 

 

 
   2019   2018 

Actuarial liabilities

    

Financial obligations—BrTPREV plan (i)

   626,748    574,725 

PAMEC Plan

   6,264    4,397 

Total

   633,012    579,122 

Non-current

   633,012    579,122 

 

(i)

Represented by theThe Company had a financial obligations agreement entered into by the Company andwith Fundação Atlântico intended for the payment of the mathematical provision without coverage by the plan’s assets. This obligation representsWith the commitment underapproval and ratification of the JRP, the related claim of Fundação Atlântico against Oi is subject to the new terms and conditions of the JRP.

Overfunded status

   2018   2017 

TCSPREV plan

   364,552    1,329,931 

TelemarPrev plan

   343,286    317,500 

PBS – Telemar plan

   50,869    53,041 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   758,707    1,700,472 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Current

   4,880    1,080 

Non-current

   753,827    1,699,392 

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

Assets recognized to be offset against future employer contributions

The Company recognized TCSPREV Plan assets related to: (i) sponsor contributions which participants that left the Plan are not entitled to redeem; and (ii) part of the Plan’s surplus attributed to the sponsor.

The assets recognized are used to offset future employer contributions. These assets are broken down as follows:

 

   2019   2018 

Actuarial assets

    

TCSPREV Plan

   56,559    68,934 

CELPREV Plan

   222    199 

PBS-TNC Plan

   3,264   

Total

   60,045    69,133 

Current

   5,430    4,880 

Non-current

   54,615    64,253 

Characteristics of the sponsored pension plans

 

1)

FATL

FATL,close-end, multiple sponsor, multiple plan pension fund, is a nonprofit, private pension-related entity, with financial and administrative independence, headquartered in Rio de Janeiro, State of Rio de Janeiro, engaged in the management and administration of pension benefit plans for the employees of its sponsors.

Plans

 

(i)

PBS-Telemar

Defined contribution pension Benefit Plan, closed to new entrants, enrolled with the CNPB underNo. 2000.0015-56.

The contributions from Active Participants of thePBS-Telemar Benefit Plan correspond to the sum of: (i) 0.5% to 1.5% of the Contribution Salary (according to the participant’s age on enrollment date); (ii) 1% of Contribution Salary that exceeds half of one Standard Unit; and (iii) 11% of the Contribution Salary that exceeds one Standard Unit. The Sponsors’ contributions are equivalent to 8% of the payroll of active participants of the plan. The plan is funded under the capital formation approach.

(ii)

TelemarPrev

Variable contribution pension Benefit Plan, enrolled with the CNPB underNo. 2000.0065-74.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

A participant’s regular contribution is comprised of two portions: (i) basic—equivalent to 2% of the contribution salary; and (ii) standard—equivalent to 3% of the positive difference between the total contribution salary and the social security contribution. The additional extraordinary contributions from participants are optional and can be made in multiples of 0.5% of the Contribution Salary, for a period of not less than six (6) months. Nonrecurring extraordinary contributions from a participant are also optional and cannot be lower than 5% of the Contribution Salary ceiling.

The Plan’s Charter requires the parity between participants’ and sponsors’ contributions, up to the limit of 8% of the Contribution Salary, even though a sponsor is not required to match Extraordinary Contributions made by participants. The plan is funded under the capital formation approach.

(iii)

TCSPREV and BRTPREV (Plan merged with into TCSPREV on November 30, 2018)

Variable contribution pension Benefit Plan, closed to new entrants, enrolled with the CNPB underNo. 2000.0028-38.

On November 30, 2018, date of the actual merger, TCSPREV Benefits Plan merged the BrTPREV Benefits Plan (CNPBNo. 2002,0017-74)2002.0017-74) to become the full successor of thesethis Plan’s rights and obligations, assuming all its assets and liabilities. This merger was approved by PREVIC Administrative Rule 995, of October 24, 2018, published on Federal Official Gazette No. 208 of October 29, 2018.

With the recognition and registration of the merger, the Participants and Beneficiaries linked to BrTPREV automatically became Participants and Beneficiaries TCSPREV, in accordance with the categories of Beneficiaries existing on the day prior to the merger date.

The monthly, mandatory Basic Contribution of the Active Participants of the TCSPREV and BrTPREV (merged plan) groups corresponds to the outcome obtained by applying a percentage that may range from 3% to 8% on the Contribution Salary, (PS), pursuant to the age and option of each Participant. The Plan’s Charter provides for contribution parity by the Participants and the Sponsors.

The monthly Contribution of the Fundador/Alternativo Plan Participants, previously merged with and into BrTPREV, corresponds to the sum of: (i) 3% charged on the Contribution Salary; (ii) 2% charged on the Contribution Salary that exceeds half of the highest Official Pension Scheme Contribution Salary, and (iii) 6.3% charged on the Contribution Salary that that exceeds the highest Official Pension Scheme Contribution Salary. The Plan’s Charter provides for contribution parity by the Participants and the Sponsors.

In accordance with regulatory criteria, the Sponsors’ contributions, related to TCSPREV and BrTPREV Participants are automatically cancelled on the month subsequent to the month when the same Participant reaches the age of 60 years old, 10 years of Credited Services, and 10 years of Plan membership.

For participants who migrated from thePBS-TCS Plan to the TCSPREV Plan, the Sponsors’ contributions are cancelled on the month subsequent to the month when a Participant reaches the age of 57 years old, 10 years of uninterrupted membership ofPBS-TCS and the TCSPREV Plan, 10 years of Credited Services at the Sponsor, and 35 years of registration with the official Social Security scheme.

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial Reorganization – Debtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

The TCSPREV and BrTPREV Participant’s Voluntary Contribution corresponds to the product obtained, in whole numbers, by applying a percentage of up 22%, elected by the Participant, to the Participation Salary.

The Sporadic Contribution is optional and both its amount and frequency are freely chosen by the Participant, as defined by the TCSPREV or BrTPREV Plan, provided it is not lower than one (1) UPTCS (TCSPREV Pension Unit) or one (1) UPBrT (BrT’s Pension Unit), respectively. The Sponsor does not make any counterpart contribution to the Participant’s Voluntary or Sporadic contribution.

The plan is funded under the capital formation approach.

 

(ii)

PBS-Telemar

Defined contribution pension Benefit Plan, closed to new entrants, enrolled with the CNPB underNo. 2000.0015-56.

The contributions from Active Participants of thePBS-Telemar Benefit Plan correspond to the sum of: (i) 0.5% to 1.5% of the Contribution Salary (according to the participant’s age on enrollment date); (ii) 1% of Contribution Salary that exceeds half of one Standard Unit; and (iii) 11% of the Contribution Salary that exceeds one Standard Unit. The Sponsors’ contributions are equivalent to 8% of the payroll of active participants of the plan. The plan is funded under the capital formation approach.

(iii)

TelemarPrev

Variable contribution pension Benefit Plan, enrolled with the CNPB underNo. 2000.0065-74.

A participant’s regular contribution is comprised of two portions: (i) basic - equivalent to 2% of the contribution salary; and (ii) standard - equivalent to 3% of the positive difference between the total contribution salary and the social security contribution. The additional extraordinary contributions from participants are optional and can be made in multiples of 0.5% of the Contribution Salary, for a period of not less than six (6) months. Nonrecurring extraordinary contributions from a participant are also optional and cannot be lower than 5% of the Contribution Salary ceiling.

The Plan’s Charter requires the parity between participants’ and sponsors’ contributions, up to the limit of 8% of the Contribution Salary, even though a sponsor is not required to match Extraordinary Contributions made by participants. The plan is funded under the capital formation approach.

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

(iv)

PBS-TNC

Defined contribution pension Benefit Plan, closed to new entrants, enrolled with the CNPB underNo. 2000.0013-19.

The contributions from Active Participants of thePBS-TNC Benefit Plan correspond to the sum of: (i) 0.28% to 0.85% of the Contribution Salary (according to the participant’s age on enrollment date); (ii) 0.57% of Contribution Salary that exceeds half of one Standard Unit; and (iii) 6.25% of the Contribution Salary that exceeds one Standard Unit. The Sponsors’ contributions are equivalent to a percentage of the payroll of the employees who are Active Plan Participants, as set on an annual basis in the Costing Plan.

The contribution of the Current Beneficiaries (only those who receive a retirement allowance) is equivalent to a percentage to be set on an annual basis in the Costing Plan, applied on the overall benefit, limited to the amount of the allowance.

The plan is funded under the capital formation approach.

 

(v)

CELPREV

Defined Contribution Pension Benefit Plan, enrolled with the CNPB underNo. 2004.0009-29.

On January 12, 2018, pursuant to Administrative Rule 22, published on the Federal Official Gazette of January 16, 2018, PREVIC approved the new text of the Plan’s Charter, which closes the number of CELPREV participants and prevents new entrants.

The Participant’s Basic Regular Contribution corresponds to the product obtained by applying a percentage, 0%, 0.5%, 1%, 1.5% or 2%, depending on each participant’s option, to his or her Contribution Salary (SP). The Sponsors contribute with an amount equivalent to such contribution, less the monthly, mandatory contribution of each Sponsor required to fund risk costs (Sick Pay Benefit).

The Additional Regular Contribution corresponds The Participant’s Basic Regular Contribution corresponds to the product obtained by applying a percentage ranging from 0% to 6%, in multiples of 0.5%, as elected by each participant, on the Contribution Salary exceeding 10 Plan Benchmark Units (URPs). The Sponsors contribute with an equivalent amount.

The Participant’s Voluntary Contribution corresponds to a whole number percentage, freely elected by each participant, applied on the Contribution Salary. The Sponsor does not make any counterpart contribution to this contribution.

The Sponsor’s Nonrecurring Contribution is voluntarily and corresponds to applying a percentage ranging from 50% to 150% of the aggregate Basic Regular and Additional Regular Contributions of the Sponsor, pursuant to consistent,non-discriminatory criteria, made with the frequency set by the Sponsor.

The Sponsor’s Special Contribution is specific for new Plan members who have joined the plan within 90 days starting March 18, 2004.

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial Reorganization – Debtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

The Sponsor’s monthly, mandatory Risk Contribution, required to fund the Sick Pay Benefit, corresponds to percentage ofNon-migrating Participants’ Contribution Salary payroll.

The plan is funded under the capital formation approach.

 

2)

SISTEL

SISTEL is a nonprofit, private welfare and pension entity, established in November 1977, which is engaged in creating and operating private plans to grant benefits in the form of lump sums or annuities, supplementary or similar to the government retirement pensions, to the employees and their families who are linked to SISTEL’s sponsors.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

Plans

 

(i)

PBS-A

Multiemployer pensionDefined benefit plan jointly sponsored with other sponsors associated to the provision of telecommunications services and offered to participants who held the status of beneficiaries on January 1, 2000.

Contributions to thePBS-A are contingent on the determination of an accumulated deficit anddeficit. As at December 31, 2019, date of the Company is jointly and severally liable, along with other fixed-line telecommunications companies, for 100%last actuarial valuation, the plan presented a surplus.

In December 2019, the National Pension Plan Authority (PREVIC) approved the allocation of any insufficiency in payments owed to membersa special reserve of thePBS-A plan. AsBenefit Plan, with the reversal of December 31, 2018,amounts to sponsors and improvement of benefits, in the form of temporary income, to the beneficiaries. The total amount of the Company’s share of thePBS-APBS-A’s plan had a surplus corresponds to R$669,054 (R$140,274 in the Company), to be received in 36 monthly installments, adjusted by the Plan’s profitability, the accounting recognition of R$2,505,063. No contributions werewhich as the installments are received, with an impact on other comprehensive income, as required in 2018, 2017 and 2016.by IAS 19.

 

(ii)

PAMA

PAMA is a multiemployer healthcare plan for retired employees aimed at providing medical care coverage to beneficiaries, with copayments by and contributions from the latter. The PAMA plan has been closedlatter, provided that linked to new members since February 2000, other than new beneficiaries of current members and employees that are coveredthe Defined Benefit pension plans managed by thePBS-A plan who have not yet electedSISTEL.

Up to join the PAMA plan. In December 2003,2014, the Company began sponsoringdid not consider the PCE –Special Coverage Plan, or the PCE plan, a health-care plan managed by Sistel. The PCE plan is open to employees that are covered by the PAMA plan. From February to July 2004, December 2005 to April 2006, June to September 2008, July 2009 to February 2010, March to November 2010, February 2011 to March 2012assets and March 2012 until today, the Company offered incentives to its employees to migrate fromliabilities of the PAMA plan because it is multi-sponsored and similar to defined contribution plans (benefits paid are limited to the PCEamount of the contributions received by the plan), and there are no other obligations in addition to the existing balances.

However, as from the issue of National Supplementary Healthcare Agency’s position that SISTEL is a sponsor of the healthcare plan as defined by Law 9656/1998 and as a result does not qualify as a Healthcare plan operator, SISTEL is liable for some plan obligations, even though it is not make entitled to revenue from the corresponding contributions. Thus, it is no longer possible to qualify this plan as a defined contribution plan.

In October 2015, in compliance with a court order, SistelSISTEL transferred the surpluses of thePBS-A benefits plan, amounting to R$3,042 million, to ensure the solvency of the plan PAMA. Of the total amount transferred, R$2,127 million is related to the plans sponsored by the Company, apportioned proportionallyprorated to the obligationsportions of the defined benefit plan.

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial Reorganization – Debtor-in-Possessionobligations. The amount was established based on actuarial studies prepared by an outside consulting firm using assumptions consistent with the population of PAMA users and Subsidiaries

Notesthe projection of medical expenses increase inherent to this population. Beginning on the Financial Statements

forissue of said court order, the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017Company started to calculate and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

As of December 31, 2018,disclose information on the PAMA plan had a surplus of R$21,542. No significant contribution in 2018, 2017 and 2016.actuarial obligations, pursuant to IAS 19 criteria.

 

3)

PAMEC-BrTPAMEC-BrT—Assistance - Assistance plan managed by the Company

Healthcare plan intended to provide medical care to the retirees and survivor pensioners linked to the TCSPREV Benefit Plan. This Benefit Plan is managed by FATL.

The contributions forPAMEC-BrT were fully paid in July 1998, through a single appropriation. However, as this plan is now administrated by the Company, after the transfer of management by Fundação 14 in November 2007, there are no assets recognized to cover current expenses, and the actuarial obligation is fully recognized in the Company’s liabilities.

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

Funded StatusStatuses of the sponsored plans, revalued at the end of the reporting period

Changes in the actuarial obligations, fair value of assets and amounts recognized in the balance sheet

 

   2018  2017 
   TCSPREV  BrTPREV  TelemarPrev  PBS-Telemar  PAMEC  TCSPREV  BrTPREV  TelemarPrev  PBS-Telemar  PAMEC 

Projected benefit obligation at the beginning of the year

   625,266   2,524,729   3,825,053   307,659   3,300   572,477   2,306,858   3,491,343   286,159   3,276 

Service cost

   196   74   1,870   41   —     457   102   1,545   33   —   

Interest cost

   78,223   218,104   362,886   29,113   317   64,927   260,650   397,842   32,488   378 

Benefits paid

   (61,605  (177,215  (272,271  (23,441  (688  (54,979  (205,879  (263,493  (23,158  (122

Participan’s contributions

   2   12   —     34   —     —     —     —     41   —   

Changes in actuarial assumptions

   (12,212  60,942   247,746   14,723   1,468   42,384   162,980   197,816   12,096   (232

Merger plans

   2,626,646   (2,626,646        
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Projected benefit obligation at the end of the year

   3,256,516   —     4,165,284   328,129   4,397   625,266   2,524,711   3,825,053   307,659   3,300 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   2018  2017 
   TCSPREV  BrTPREV  TelemarPrev  PBS-Telemar  PAMEC  TCSPREV  BrTPREV  TelemarPrev  PBS-Telemar  PAMEC 

Fair value of plan assets at the beginning of the year

   1,953,967   1,895,608   4,142,553   360,700   —     1,845,367   1,806,042   3,853,595   314,203  

Actual return on plan assets

   (187,708  197,994   638,288   41,639   —     163,580   295,413   552,451��  69,540  

Company’s contributions

   2   11   —     66   688   —     15    73   122 

Participan’s contributions

   2   12   —     34   —     —     —      41  

Benefits paid

   (61,605  (177,215  (272,271  (23,441  (688  (54,979  (205,879  (263,493  (23,158  (122

Merger plans

   1,916,410   (1,916,410        
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Fair value of plan assets at the end of the year

   3,621,068   —     4,508,570   379,998   —     1,953,967   1,895,591   4,142,553   360,700  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   

 

  

 

  2018  

 

  

 

  2017  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 
   TCSPREV  BrTPREV  TelemarPrev  PBS-Telemar  PAMEC  TCSPREV  BrTPREV  TelemarPrev  PBS-Telemar  PAMEC 

Underfunded (overfunded) status of plan

   (364,552  —     (343,286  (50,869  4,397   (1,328,701  629,120   (317,500  (53,041  3,300 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   2019 
   PENSION PLANS  MEDICAL CARE
PLANS
 
   TCSPREV  PBS-Telemar  TelemarPrev  PBS-A  PBS-TNC  CELPREV  PAMEC  PAMA 

Present value of actuarial obligation at beginning of year

   3,256,516   328,130   4,165,284   4,811,332   35,043   26   4,397   3,422,402 

Interest on actuarial liabilities

   283,542   28,419   367,633   415,476   3,066   2   414   308,512 

Current service cost

   250   34   1,613    82   2    322 

Participant contributions made in the year

   15   28       

Benefits paid, net

   (262,369  (23,683  (285,160  (429,813  (2,460   (484  (229,329

Increase/(decrease) of assets due to changes in the Plan

      183,195     

Benefit obligation result allocated to other comprehensive income

   500,731   32,358   729,147   660,695   4,984   1   1,937   641,713 

Asset increase/(decrease) as a result of the Plan’s merger

         

Present value of actuarial obligation at the end of the year

   3,778,685   365,286   4,978,517   5,640,885   40,715   31   6,264   4,143,620 

Fair value of assets at the beginning of the year

   3,621,068   379,000   4,508,570   7,316,395   60,062   3,340    3,443,944 

Return on plan assets

   313,409   33,149   394,800   649,891   5,255   293    312,145 

Amortizing contributions received from sponsor

         484  

Sponsor

   13   65       

Participants

   15   28       

Benefits payment

   (262,369  (23,683  (285,160  (429,813  (2,460   (484  (229,329

Benefit obligation result allocated to other comprehensive income

   345,124   42,087   680,478   730,389   1,980   558    895,983 

Asset increase/(decrease) as a result of the Plan’s merger

         

Fair value of plan assets at the end of the year

   4,017,260   430,646   5,298,688   8,266,862   64,837   4,191    4,422,743 

(=) Net actuarial liability/(asset) amount

   (238,575  (65,360  (320,171  (2,625,977  (24,122  (4,160  6,264   (279,123

Effect of the asset/onerous liability recognition ceiling

   182,016   65,360   320,171   2,625,977   20,858   3,938    279,123 

(=) Recognized net actuarial liability/(asset)

   (56,559     (3,264  (222  6,264  

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

Net periodic defined benefit pension cost for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 includes the following:

  2018 
  PENSION PLANS  MEDICAL CARE
PLANS
 
  BrTPREV
(*)
  TCSPREV  PBS-Telemar  TelemarPrev  PBS-A  PBS-TNC  CELPREV  PAMEC  PAMA 

Present value of actuarial obligation at beginning of year

  2,524,728   625,266   307,658   3,825,053   4,675,447   31,938   41   3,300   3,113,772 

Interest on actuarial liabilities

  218,105   78,223   29,113   362,886   439,285   3,027   4   317   299,881 

Current service cost

  74   196   41   1,870    55   3    273 

Participant contributions made in the year

  12   2   34     1    

Benefits paid, net

  (177,215  (61,605  (23,441  (272,271  (422,312  2,527    (688  (237,744

Benefit obligation result allocated to other comprehensive income

  60,942   (12,212  14,725   247,746   118,912   (2,505  (22  1,468   246,220 

Asset increase/(decrease) as a result of the Plan’s merger

  (2,626,646  2,626,646        

Present value of actuarial obligation at the end of the year

   3,256,516   328,130   4,165,284   4,811,332   35,043   26   4,397   3,422,402 

Fair value of assets at the beginning of the year

  1,895,608   1,953,967   360,700   4,142,553   7,462,931   59,723   3,030    3,243,093 

Return on plan assets

  161,415   200,469   34,332   394,097   713,294   5,759   298    312,593 

Amortizing contributions received from sponsor

  11         

Regular contributions received by plan

  12   4   100     3   1   688  

Sponsor

   2   66     2    

Participants

  12   2   34     1    

Benefits payment

  (177,215  (61,605  (23,441  (272,271  (422,312  (2,505   (688  (237,744

Benefit obligation result allocated to other comprehensive income

  36,579   (388,177  7,309   244,191   (437,518  (2,918  11    126,002 

Asset increase/(decrease) as a result of the Plan’s merger

  (1,916,410  1,916,410        

Fair value of plan assets at the end of the year

   3,621,068   379,000   4,508,570   7,316,395   60,062   3,340    3,443,944 

(=) Net actuarial liability/(asset) amount

   (364,552)   (50,870)   (343,286)   (2,505,063)   (25,019)   (3,314)   4,397   (21,542) 

Effect of the asset/onerous liability recognition ceiling

   295,618   50,870   343,286   2,505,063   25,019   3,115    21,542 

(=) Recognized net actuarial liability/(asset)

   (68,934)       (199)   4,397  

 

   2018 
   TCSPREV   BrTPREV   TelemarPrev   PBS-Telemar 

Net service cost

   196    74    1,870    41 

Interest cost

   78,222    218,104    362,887    29,114 

Expected return on plan assets

   (195,301   (161,415   (394,097   (34,332

Amortization of net actuarial losses (gains)

       32,823   

Amortization of prior year service costs (gains)

   (5,636   1,552     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net periodic pension cost (benefit)

   (122,519   58,315    3,483    (5,177
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
(*)

Plan merged with into TCSPREV on November 30, 2018.

 

   2017 
   TCSPREV   BrTPREV   TelemarPrev   PBS-Telemar 

Net service cost

   457    102    1,545    32 

Interest cost

   64,927    260,650    397,842    32.488 

Expected return on plan assets

   (220,246   (210,579   (440,696   (35,817

Amortization of net actuarial losses (gains)

       16,482   

Amortization of prior year service costs (gains)

   (5,636   1,552     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net periodic pension cost (benefit)

   (160,498   51,724    (24,828   (3,297
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

   2016 
   TCSPREV  BrTPREV  TelemarPrev  PBS-Telemar  PAMEC 

Net service cost

   551   138   2,042   24  

Interest cost

   62,214   249,319   350,701   30,475   330 

Expected return on plan assets

   (193,747  (206,407  (413,965  (34,872 

Amortization of net actuarial losses (gains)

     4,380   

Amortization of prior year service costs (gains)

   (5,636  1,552    

Amortization of initial transition obligation

     (1,051  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net periodic pension cost (benefit)

   (136,618  44,603   (57,894  (4,373  330 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The net periodic pension cost expected to be recognized in 2019 are as follows:

   2019 
   TCSPREV   TelemarPrev   PBS-Telemar   PAMEC 

Net service cost

   265      1,484    32 

Interest cost

   287,492    464    370,526    29,117 

Expected return on plan assets

   (271,132     (388,996   (33,471

Amortization of net actuarial losses (gains)

       23,466   

Amortization of prior year service costs (gains)

   46,728       
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net periodic pension cost (benefit)

   63,353    464    6,480    (4,322
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

The following actuarial assumptions were usedCompany determines the amount available to determinededuct from future contributions according to the actuarialapplicable legal provisions and the benefit plan charter. The amount of the asset linked to the TCSPREV,PBS-TNC and CELPREV Plans recognized in the Company’s financial statements does not exceed the present value of future contributions.

Expenses (revenue) components of the Company’s projected benefit obligation:benefits

 

   2018 
      BrTPREV  TelemarPrev 
      and  and 
   TCSPREV  PAMEC  PBS-Telemar 

Discount rate for determining projected benefit obligations

   9.20  9.20  9.20

Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets

   9.20  9.20  9.20

Annual salary increases

   By Sponsor   By Sponsor   By Sponsor 

Rate of compensation increase

   4,00  4,00  4,00

Inflation rate assumption used in the above

   4,00  4,00  4,00
   2019 
   PENSION PLANS  MEDICAL CARE
PLANS
 
   TCSPREV  PBS-Telemar  TelemarPrev  PBS-A  PBS-TNC  CELPREV  PAMEC   PAMA 

Current service cost

   250   34   1,613    82   2     322 

Interest on actuarial liabilities

   283,541   28,419   367,633   415,476   3,066   2   414    308,512 

Return on plan assets

   (313,409  (33,149  (394,800  (649,891  (5,255  (293    (312,146

Interest on onerous liability

   24,000   4,725   27,167   234,415   2,065   273     3,634 

Effect of the unrecognized net actuarial asset

          

Expenses (income) recognized in statement of profit or loss

   (5,618)   29   1,613    (42)   (16)   414    322 

Expenses (income) recognized in other comprehensive income

   18,005   36   (1,613   (2,382  (7  1,937    (322

Total expense (income) recognized

   12,387   65     (2,424)   (23)   2,351   

 

   2017 
      BrTPREV  TelemarPrev 
      and  and 
   TCSPREV  PAMEC  PBS-Telemar 

Discount rate for determining projected benefit obligations

   9.83  9.83  9.83

Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets

   9.83  9.83  9.83

Annual salary increases

   By Sponsor   By Sponsor   By Sponsor 

Rate of compensation increase

   4,30  4,30  4,30

Inflation rate assumption used in the above

   4,30  4,30  4,30
  2018 
  PENSION PLANS  MEDICAL CARE
PLANS
 
  BrTPREV  TCSPREV  PBS-Telemar  TelemarPrev  PBS-A  PBS-TNC  CELPREV  PAMEC  PAMA 

Current service cost

  74   196   41   1,870    55   3    274 

Interest on actuarial liabilities

  218,103   78,222   29,114   362,887   439,285   3,027   4   317   299,881 

Return on plan assets

  (161,415  (200,469  (34,332  (394,097  (713,295  (5,759  (298   (312,593

Interest on onerous liability

   112,564   5,214   31,210   274,010   2,731   294    12,712 

Effect of the unrecognized net actuarial asset

          (274

Expenses (income) recognized in statement of profit or loss

  56,762   (9,487)   37   1,870    54   3   317  

Expenses (income) recognized in other comprehensive income

  24,364   42,233   30   (1,870   (891  (201  1,469  

Total expense (income) recognized

  81,126   32,746   67     (837)   (198)   1,786  

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

  2017 
  PENSION PLANS  MEDICAL
CARE PLANS
 
  BrTPREV  TCSPREV  PBS-Telemar  TelemarPrev  PBS-A  PBS-TNC  CELPREV  PAMEC  PAMA 

Current service cost

  102   457   33   1,545    48   7    170,184 

Interest on actuarial liabilities

  260,649   64,927   32,488   397,842   499,261   3,328   15   378   286,035 

Return on plan assets

  (210,579  (215,509  (35,817  (440,696  (781,757  (6,343  (301   (331,699

Interest on onerous liability

   136,800   3,317   42,854   282,496   3,014   286    45,664 

Effect of the unrecognized net actuarial asset

    (21  (1,545   (47  (7   (170,184

Expenses (income) recognized in statement of profit or loss

  50,172   (13,325)        378  

Expenses (income) recognized in other comprehensive income

  78,147   28,149        (232 

Effect of the unrecognized net actuarial asset

         

Total expense (income) recognized

  128,319   14,824        146  

Main actuarial assumptions adopted on December 31, 2019

  PENSION PLANS MEDICAL CARE PLANS
  TCSPREV PBS-Telemar TelemarPrev PBS-A PBS-TNC CELPREV PAMEC PAMA

Nominal discount rate of actuarial liability

 7.43% 7.43% 7.43% 7.43% 7.43% 7.43% 7.64% 7.64%

Estimated inflation rate

 3.80% 3.80% 3.80% 3.80% 3.80% 3.80% 3.80% 3.80%

Estimated nominal salary increase index

 4.00% 4.00% Per sponsor N.A. 8.82% 7.53% N.A. N.A.

Estimated nominal benefit growth rate

 3.80% 3.80% 3.80% 3.80% 3.80% 3.80% N.A. N.A.

Total expected rate of return on plan assets

 7.43% 7.43% 7.43% 7.43% 7.43% 7.43% 7.64% 7.64%

General mortality biometric table

 AT-2000 Basic
eased by 15%,
segregated by
gender
 AT-2000 Basic
eased by 20%,
segregated by
gender
 AT-2000 Basic
eased by 20%,
segregated by
gender
 AT-2000 Basic
eased by 15%,
segregated by
gender
 AT-2000 Basic
eased by 15%,
segregated by
gender
 N.A. AT-2000 Basic
eased by 15%,
segregated by
gender
 AT-2000 Basic
eased by 15%,
segregated by
gender

Biometric disability table

 Álvaro Vindas,
increased
by100%
 Álvaro Vindas,
increased
by100%
 Álvaro Vindas,
increased
by100%
 Álvaro Vindas,
increased
by100%
 Álvaro Vindas,
increased
by100%
 N.A. Álvaro Vindas,
increased
by100%
 Álvaro Vindas,
increased
by100%

Biometric disabled mortality table

 AT-49,
segregated by
gender
 AT-49,
segregated by
gender
 AT-49,
segregated by
gender
 AT-49,
segregated by
gender
 AT-49,
segregated by
gender
 N.A. AT-49,
segregated by
gender
 AT-49,
segregated by
gender

Turnover rate

 4.80% Nil Per sponsor,
null starting at
50 years old
and null for
Settled Benefit
 Nil Nil 2% Nil Nil

Starting age of the benefits

 57 years old 57 years old 55 years old N.A. 57 years old 55 years old N.A. N.A.

Nominal medical costs growth rate

 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 6.91% 6.91%

N.A. = Not applicable.

ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURES—2019

(a)   Plans’ assets and liabilities correspond to the amounts as at December 31, 2019.

(b)   Master file data used for the plans managed by FATL and for the PAMEC plan are as at July 31, 2019, and for SISTEL are as at June 30, 2019, both projected for December 31, 2019.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

Investment policy of the plans

The investment policies and strategies for the two single-employer benefit pension plansPBS-Telemar and TelemarPrev are subject to Resolution N° 3,121strategy of the National Monetary Council,Benefits Plans is described in their investment policy, which establishes investment guidelines.

TelemarPrev is a defined contribution plan with individual capitalization. Management allocatesannually approved by the investments in order to conciliate the expectationsgoverning board of the sponsors, active and assisted participants. The assetssponsored funds. This policy establishes that investment decision-making must take into consideration: (i) the preservation of capital; (ii) the diversification of investments; (iii) the risk appetite according to conservative assumptions; (iv) the expected return rate based on December 31, 2018 consists mainlyactuarial requirements; (v) the compatibility of investment liquidity with the following portfolio: 93% in debt securities, 4% in equity of Brazilian companies and 3% in real estate and other assets.

PBS-Telemar plan is closed for new participants and the vast majority of the current participants are receiving their benefits. The mathematical reserves are readjusted annually considering an interest rate of 6% per annum over the variation of the National Consumer Price Index (“INPC”). Therefore, management’s strategy is to guarantee resources that exceed this readjustment. Management also prepares a long-term cash-flow to match assets and liabilities. Therefore, debt securities investments are preferred when choosing the allocation of its assets, representing 90% of the portfolio in December 31, 2018.

The investment policies and strategies for TCSPREV and PAMEC, which is approved annually by the pension fund’s board states that the investment decisions should consider: (i) capital preservation; (ii) diversification; (iii) risk tolerance; (iv) expected returns versus benefit plan’s interest rates; (v) compatibility between investments liquidity and pensions’plans’ cash flows, and (vi) reasonable management costs. ItThe policy also defines the volume rangesinterval for the different types of investment allowed for the pension funds, which are: domesticas follows: fixed income, domestic equity,variable income, structured investments, investments abroad, loans to pension fund’s membersparticipants, and real estate. In the fixed income portfolio, only low credit risk securities are allowed.

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial Reorganization – Debtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

Derivative instruments are only permitted for hedging purposes. Loans are restricted to certain credit limits. Tactical allocation is decided by the investment committee, consisted of the pension fund’s officers, investment manager and one member designated by the Board. Execution is performed by the Finance Department.estate investments.

The average ceilings set for the different types of investment permitted for pension funds, as at December 31, 2019 and 2018, are as follows:

 

ASSET SEGMENT  TCSPREV BrTPREV PBS-Telemar TelemarPrev   TCSPREV   PBS-Telemar   TelemarPrev   PBS-A   PBS-TNC   CELPREV   PAMA 

Fixed income

   100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00   100.00%    100.00%    100.00%    100.00%    100.00%    100.00%    100.00% 

Variable income

   17.00 17.00 17.00 17.00   70.00%    70.00%    70.00%    70.00%    70.00%    70.00%    0.00% 

Structured investments

   20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00   20.00%    20.00%    20.00%    20.00%    20.00%    20.00%    0.00% 

Investments abroad

   5.00 5.00 2.00 5.00   10.00%    10.00%    10.00%    0.00%    10.00%    10.00%    0.00% 

Real estate

   8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00   20.00%    20.00%    20.00%    20.00%    20.00%    20.00%    0.00% 

Loans to participants

   15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00   15.00%    15.00%    15.00%    3.00%    15.00%    15.00%    0.00% 

The allocation of plan assets as at December 31, 2019 is as follows:

ASSET SEGMENT

  TCSPREV   PBS-Telemar   TelemarPrev   PBS-A   PBS-TNC   CELPREV   PAMA 

Fixed income

   86.06%    90.57%    92.46%    95.10%    85.61%    88.20%    100.00% 

Variable income

   1.63%    0.34%    0.96%    0.00%    0.48%    3.17%    0.00% 

Structured investments

   10.85%    7.84%    5.04%    0.00%    13.71%    7.25%    0.00% 

Investments abroad

   0.21%    0.00%    0.11%    0.00%    0.00%    0.50%    0.00% 

Real estate

   0.83%    0.90%    0.76%    4.10%    0.00%    0.00%    0.00% 

Loans to participants

   0.42%    0.35%    0.67%    0.80%    0.20%    0.88%    0.00% 

Total

   100.00%    100.00%    100.00%    100.00%    100.00%    100.00%    100.00% 

The allocation of plan assets as at December 31, 2018 is as follows:

 

ASSET SEGMENT  TCSPREV  PBS-
Telemar
  TelemarPrev 

Fixed income

   86.17  90.48  92.51

Variable income

   2.90  1.30  1.61

Equity securities

   9.23  6.65  4.21

Real estate

   0.43  0.38  0.67

Investments abroad

   0.85  0.92  0.79

Loans to participants

   0.42  0.26  0.21

Total

   100.00  100.00  100.00

Expected contribution and benefits

The estimated benefit payments, which reflect future services, as appropriate, are expected to be paid as follows (unaudited):

   TCSPREV   PBS-Telemar   TelemarPrev 

2019

   263,210    23,288    275,663 

2020

   259,437    24,127    283,101 

2021

   266,985    24,964    294,351 

2022

   274,169    25,811    305,905 

2023

   281,150    26,688    317,588 

2024 until 2028

   1,501,637    145,953    1,773,564 

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial Reorganization – Debtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

ASSET SEGMENT

  TCSPREV   PBS-Telemar   TelemarPrev   PBS-A   PBS-TNC   CELPREV   PAMA 
              

Fixed income

   86.17%    90.49%    92.51%    93.70%    83.87%    88.80%    100.00% 

Variable income

   2.90%    1.30%    1.61%    0.77%    2.51%    4.00%   

Structured investments

   9.23%    6.65%    4.21%    0.03%    12.84%    5.68%   

Investments abroad

   0.85%    0.92%    0.79%         

Real estate

   0.43%    0.38%    0.67%    4.67%    0.27%    1.15%   

Loans to participants

   0.42%    0.26%    0.21%    0.83%    0.51%    0.37%   

Total

   100.00%    100.00%    100.00%    100.00%    100.00%    100.00%    100.00% 

 

(b)

Employee profit sharing

In the year ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 20162019, the Company and its subsidiaries recognized provisions for employee profit sharing based on individual and corporate goal attainment estimates totaling R$247,178 (R$265,753 R$309,744in 2018).

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$74,211, respectively., unless otherwise stated)

 

(c)

Share-based compensation

The Long-term Incentive Program (2015-2017), approved byA long-term incentives plan based on shares granted the Company’sExecutives and the Board of Directors (Executive Committee’s Stock Option Plan and the Board of Directors’ Stock Option Plan) was submitted to and approved at the Extraordinary Shareholders’ Meeting held on March 13, 2015, soughtApril 26, 2019.

However, in light of the opinion issued by the Federal Public Prosecution Office and the decision issued by the Judicial Reorganization Court on April 24, 2019 on the new long-term incentives plans, the Oi’s Board of Directors decided and communicated to the Extraordinary Shareholders’ Meeting that such plans would only be implemented after a greater alignmentnew decision of said Court, authorizing its implementation, is issued.

Beginning December 17, 2019, with the Ruling awarded by the 8th Civil Chamber of the Rio de Janeiro State Court on Bill of ReviewNo. 0035453-90.2019.8.19.0000, filed by the Public Prosecution Office, the decision that the Stock Option Plan for the members of the Board of Directors should not be implemented until the end of the judicial reorganization was maintained and the implementation of Stock Action Plan for said Company Executives was authorized.

In compliance with the decision referred to above, in December 2019 the Company implemented the New Stock Option Plan for the Executive Committee, according to all the rules and conditions approved at the Extraordinary Shareholders’ Meeting held on April 26, 2019.

Executives’ Stock Action Plan

The purpose of this plan is to allow granting shares to Company Executives, aiming at promoting their high engagement and commitment to ensure the achievement of the strategic goals consistently with the Company’s management cycle and business priorities. its shareholders’ medium- and long-term interests.

The Program consistedplan provides for granting annual shares over a three-year period that shall not exceed 1.5% of the paymentCompany’s share capital.

The number of gross cash reward, in accordance withshares per grant is calculated individually for the Laws and Regulations, as a resultpurpose of maintaining the competitiveness of the complianceexecutives with the goals set for 2015-2017. The gross cash reward is benchmarkedregard to the quotationperformance of Company shares. their duties and shall be delivered to them provided that the plan’s performance condition is met.

The beneficiariesinformation used in the executives’ stock option plan’s assessment is as follows:

Grant date

  Stock
dilution
percentage
  Number of
shares
granted
   Vesting
portions
   Vesting dates   Average
share value at
the grant date
   Estimated fair
value at the
vesting date
 

12/30/2019

   0.57  33,704,937    1/3    12/30/2020    0.95    34,406 
   1/3    12/30/2021 
   1/3    12/30/2022 

The fair value of the granted stock options will be determined based on the vesting period and recognized as the services are not entitled to receiving Companyprovided. The estimated fair value at the acquisition date was measured taking into account the price of the shares sincegranted on December 30, 2019, adjusted by the Program does not provideweighted average cost of capital of 10.98%, estimated for the transferthree-year period of sharesthe program, brought to its beneficiaries.present value at the period’s opportunity cost of 14.67%, which corresponds to the fair value of the share.

The last installment

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of this program, referring to 2017, was paid in January 2018.Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

24.28.

SEGMENT INFORMATIONREPORTING

The Company’s managementBoard of Directors uses operating segment information for decision-making. The Company identified only one operating segment that corresponds to the telecommunications business in Brazil.

In addition to the telecommunications business in Brazil, the Company conducts other businesses that individually or in aggregate do not meet any of the quantitative indicators that would require their disclosure as reportable business segments. These businesses refer basically to the following companies: Companhia Santomense de Telecomunicações, Listas Telefónicas de Moçambique, ELTA – Empresa de Listas Telefónicas de Angola, and Timor Telecom, which provide fixed and mobile telecommunications services and publish telephone directories, and which have been consolidated since May 2014.

The revenue generation is assessed by the ManagementBoard of Directors based on a view segmented by customer, into the following categories:

 

Residential Services, focused on the sale of fixed telephony services, including voice services, data communication services (broadband), and pay TV;

 

Personal Mobility, focused on the sale of mobile telephony services to subscription and prepaid customers, and mobile broadband customers; and

 

SMEs/Corporate, which includes corporate solutions offered to our small,medium-sized, and large corporate customers.

No single customer represent more than 10% of revenues neither 10% of receivables,

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial Reorganization – Debtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

Telecommunications in Brazil

In preparing the financial information for this reportable segment, the transactions between the companies included in the segment have been eliminated. The financial information of this reportable segment for the yearsperiods ended December 31, 2018, 20172019 and 20162018 is as follows:

 

  2018   2017   2016   2019 2018 2017 

Residential

   8,401,599    9,170,835    9,376,266 

Personal mobility

   7,250,462    7,644,515    7,848,610 

SMEs/Corporate

   5,980,807    6,485,898    7,606,598 

Residential services

   7,264,262   8,401,599   9,170,835 

Residential Fixed-Line

   3,281,905  4,170,105  4,880,738 

Broadband

   2,187,015  2,423,291  2,641,836 

Pay-TV

   1,752,053  1,755,061  1,577,745 

Interconnection

   43,289  53,142  70,516 

Personal mobility services

   7,017,311   7,250,462   7,644,515 

Mobile Telephony

   6,601,729  6,607,613  6,914,862 

Interconnection

   257,099  447,980  500,106 

Handsets, sim cards and other accessories

   158,483  194,869  229,547 

SMEs/Corporate (B2B) services

   5,527,817   5,980,807   6,485,899 

Other services and businesses

   226,985    255,692    332,078    140,004   226,985   255,691 
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Net operating revenue

   21,859,853    23,556,940    25,163,552 
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total net operating revenue

   19,949,394  21,859,853  23,556,940 

Operating expenses

          

Depreciation and amortization

   (5,881,861   (5,803,487   (6,128,402   (6,804,870 (5,740,079 (5,031,477

Interconnection

   (653,867   (771,212   (1,141,786   (484,061 (653,867 (771,212

Personnel

   (2,554,375   (2,749,038   (2,750,323   (2,487,632 (2,554,375 (2,749,038

Third-party services

   (5,833,570   (6,149,189   (6,243,623   (5,957,763 (5,833,570 (6,149,189

Network maintenance services

   (1,102,809   (1,235,760   (1,501,701

Grid maintenance services

   (1,012,857 (1,102,809 (1,235,760

Handset and other costs

   (185,436   (214,102   (252,265   (159,442 (185,436 (214,102

Advertising and publicity

   (379,676   (410,495   (427,463   (494,348 (379,676 (410,495

Rentals and Insurance

   (4,335,892   (4,152,521   (4,284,672

Rentals and insurance

   (2,571,245 (4,194,135 (4,152,521

Provisions/reversals

   (89,631   (143,517   (1,056,436   (216,438 (202,122 (469,440

Allowance for doubtful accounts

   (1,062,712   (740,575   (622,527

Expected losses on trade receivables

   (488,269 (689,735 (740,576

Impairment losses

       (225,512   (2,111,022 (291,758 4,747,141 

Taxes and other expenses

   (201,296   (277,372   (399,123   (18,396 (201,296 (475,018

Other operating income (expenses), net

   (17,610   (1,234,477   (132,211   (6,974 (5,016,358 (8,196,415
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE FINANCIAL INCOME (EXPENSES) AND TAXES

   (438,882   (324,805   (2,492
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Reorganization items, net

   31,580,541    (2,371,919   (9,005,998
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

OPERATING INCOME BEFORE FINANCIAL INCOME (EXPENSES) AND TAXES

   (2,863,923)  (5,185,363)  (2,291,162) 

FINANCIAL INCOME (EXPENSES)

          

Financial income

   1,042,865    1,331,699    944,611    2,659,074  30,850,746  6,917,975 

Financial expenses

   (5,068,382   (2,075,430   (4,539,997   (8,452,638 (4,339,053 (9,246,160
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

PRETAX INCOME

   27,116,142    (3,440,455   (12,603,876
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

PRE-TAX PROFIT (LOSS)

   (8,657,487)  21,326,330  (4,619,347) 

Income tax and social contribution

   429,495    (1,498,216   (87,379   57,174  3,270,890  (1,137,715
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS

   27,545,637    (4,938,671   (12,691,255
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

PROFIT (LOSS) FOR THE YEAR

   (8,600,313)  24,597,220  (5,757,062) 

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

Reconciliation of revenue and incomeprofit (loss) for the quarter and information per geographic market

In the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016,2017, the reconciliation of the revenue offrom the segment Telecommunicationstelecommunications in Brazil and total consolidated revenue is as follows:

 

  2018   2017   2016   2019   2018   2017 

Net operating revenue

            

Revenue related to the reportable segment

   21,859,853    23,556,940    25,163,552    19,949,394    21,859,853    23,556,940 

Revenue related to other businesses

   200,161    232,714    832,871    186,789    200,161    232,714 
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Consolidated net operating revenue

   22,060,014    23,789,654    25,996,423 
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Net operating revenue (Note 5)

   20,136,183    22,060,014    23,789,654 

In the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016,2017, the reconciliation between the profit (loss)or loss before financial income (expenses) and taxes of the segment telecommunicationsTelecommunications in Brazil and the consolidated profit (loss) before financial income (expenses) and taxes is as follows:

 

  2018   2017   2016   2019 2018 2017 

Profit (loss) before taxes

      

Profit (loss) before financial income (expenses) and taxes

    

Telecommunications in Brazil

   27,116,142    (3,440,455   (12,603,876   (2,863,923 (5,185,363 (2,291,162

Other businesses

   (69,444   (938,193   (830,753   (113,447 (82,895 (69,866
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Consolidated income before taxes

   27,046,698    (4,378,648   (13,434,629
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Income before financial income (expenses) and taxes (Note 5)

   (2,977,370)  (5,268,258)  (2,361,028) 

Total assets, liabilities and property, plant and equipmenttangible and intangible assets per geographic market as at December 31, 2018 and 20172019 are as follows:

 

  2018   2019 
Total assets   Total
liabilities
   Property,
plant and
equipment
assets
   Intangible
assets
   Capital
expenditures
on property,
plant and
equipment and
intangible
assets
   Total assets   Total
liabilities
   Tangible
assets
   Intangible
assets
   Investment in
tangible and
intangible assets
 

Brazil

   62,324,414    42,015,131    28,360,030    7,977,841    5,211,774    67,294,245    53,525,978    38,910,834    3,997,865    7,396,983 

Other, primarily Africa

   4,923,187    526,870    108,768    47,601    34,467    4,597,577    569,338    84,122    21,327    28,530 

 

  2017   2018 
Total assets   Total
liabilities
   Property,
plant and
equipment
assets
   Intangible
assets
   Capital
expenditures
on property,
plant and
equipment and
intangible
assets
   Total assets   Total
liabilities
   Tangible
assets
   Intangible
assets
   Investment in
tangible and
intangible assets
 

Brazil

   66,311,553    80,316,703    26,934,278    9,206,776    4,258,545    60,514,610    42,015,116    28,425,563    6,948,446    5,211,774 

Other, primarily Africa

   4,675,216    354,127    149,176    48,063    57,947    4,923,187    526,870    108,768    47,601    34,467 

No single customer accounts for more than 10% of consolidated revenue.

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

25.29.

RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Transactions with joint venture, associates, and unconsolidated entities

   2018   2017 

Accounts receivable and other assets

   6,359    5,929 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other entities

   6,359    5,929 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

   2018   2017 

Accounts payable and other liabilities

   74,210    67,654 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Hispamar

   66,704    62,094 

Other entities

   7,506    5,560 

   2018   2017 

Revenue

    

Revenue from services rendered

   347    119 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other entities

   347    119 
  

 

 

   

Financial income

   430   
  

 

 

   

Other entities

   430   

   2018   2017 

Costs/expenses

    

Operating costs and expenses

   (236,087   (215,079
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Hispamar

   (207,271   (185,223

Other entities

   (28,816   (29,856
  

 

 

   

Financial expenses

   (167  
  

 

 

   

Hispamar

   (158  

Other entities

   (9  

The balances and transactions with jointly controlled entities, associates, and unconsolidated entities result from business transactions carried out in the normal course of operations, namely the provision of telecommunications services by the Company to these entities and the acquisition of these entities’ contents and the lease of their infrastructure.

   2019  2018 

Accounts receivable and other assets

   7,216   6,359 

Hispamar

   426  

Other entities

   6,790   6,359 
   
   2019  2018 

Accounts payable and other liabilities

   74,254   74,210 

Hispamar

   71,841   66,704 

Other entities

   2,413   7,506 
   
   2019  2018 

Revenue

   

Revenue from services rendered

   380   347 

Other entities

   380   347 

Other income

   502  

Hispamar

   502  

Financial income

   430   430 

Other entities

   430   430 
  
   2019  2018 

Costs/expenses

   

Operating costs and expenses

   (226,031)   (236,087) 

Hispamar

   (203,426  (207,271

Other entities

   (22,605  (28,816

Financial expenses

   (257)   (167) 

Hispamar

   (245  (158

Other entities

   (12  (9

Compensation of key management personnel

As at December 31, 2018,2019, the compensation of the officers responsible for the planning, management and control of the Company’s activities, including the compensation of the directors and executive officers, totaled R$63,405 (R$81,244 (R$49,688 in 2016)2018). The ratification of the JRP by the Court, after its voting and approval by the creditors at the General Creditors’ Meeting entailed the payment special,one-off, nonrecurring compensation to the statutory executive committee, of up to R$15.5 million, net of taxes and charges, as established in the agreements entered into with the executive officers and previously approved by the Company’s Board of Directors.

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

26.30.

INSURANCE

During the concession period, the concessionary has the obligation of maintaining the following insurance coverage, over the prescribed terms: “all risks” policy that covers property damages for all insurable assets belonging to the concession, insurance and against economic losses to insure the continuity of services. All material and/or high-risk assets and liabilities in are insured. The Company and its subsidiaries maintain insurance coverage against property damages, loss of revenue arising from such damages, etc. Management understands that the amount insured is sufficient to assure the integrity of assets and the continuity of operations, and the compliance with the rules set out in the Concession Agreements.

The insurance policies provide the following coverage, per risk and type of asset:

   2019   2018 

Insurance line

    

Operational risks and loss of profits

   800,000    700,000 

Civil liability—third parties (*)

   322,408    309,984 

Fire—inventories

   170,000    150,000 

Theft—inventories

   20,000    20,000 

Civil liability—general

   30,000    20,000 

Civil liability—vehicles

   2,000    2,000 

(*)

Based on the foreign exchange rate prevailing at December 31, 2019 (ptax): R$4.0301 = US$1.00

31.

HELD-FOR-SALE ASSETS

Approval of preparatory actions for the sale of Africatel

   2019   2018 

Assets

    

Operations in Africa (a)

   4,271,348    4,923,187 

Nonstrategic assets (b)

   119,742   

Total

   4,391,090    4,923,187 
  
   2019   2018 

Liabilities

    

Operations in Africa (a)

   491,225    526,870 

Nonstrategic liabilities (b)

   3,070   

Total

   494,295    526,870 

(a)

Operations in Africa—Approval of preparatory actions for the sale of Africatel

At the Board of Directors’ meeting held on September 16, 2014, Oi’s management was authorized to take all the necessary actions to divest Oi’s stake in Africatel, representing at the time 75% of Africatel’s share capital, and/or dispose of its assets.

OnWith regard specifically to the indirect interest held by Africatel in Company, on February 27, 2019 the Company was notified of the final decision issued by the Arbitration Court under the arbitration proceeding filed by PT Ventures, an Africatel subsidiary, against the other UnitelUnitel’s shareholders. The Arbitration Court judged that the other Unitel shareholders had violated several provisions of Unitel’s Shareholders’ Agreement, which resulted in a significant decrease of PT Ventures’ stake in Unitel. The Court also judged that the other Unitel shareholders failed to ensure, after November 2012, that PT Ventures received the same amount of foreign currency-denominated dividends as the other foreign Unitel shareholder.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

As a result, the Court sentencedordered the other Unitel shareholders to paid topay PT Ventures, jointly and severally, (i) US$339.4 million plus interest (calculated(accrued as from February 20, 2019, and equivalent tousing the 12 months12-month US dollar LIBOR plus two percentage points)points, with annual compounding), corresponding to the loss of the equity interest amountvalue of PT Ventures, andVentures’ stake, in addition to (ii) US$314.8307 million plus interest (simple interest of 7% accrued as from the different dates when such amountsthe dividends not received should have been received) relatedpaid to PT Ventures), in damages resulting from the fact that the other Unitel shareholders failed to ensure, after November 2012, that PT Ventures received the same amount of dividends, not receivedin foreign currency, as the other foreign Unitel shareholder, plus (iii) the net reimbursement of a significant portions of the proceeding’sfees, court costs, and administrative and arbiters fees and expenses, incurred by PT Ventures on the arbitral proceeding, in a net amount in excess of approximately US$1213 million. The Court overruleddismissed all the retrial requestspetitions filed by the other Unitel shareholders.shareholders (“2019 Arbitration Award”).

The decisionArbitration Award results in a reaffirmation of PT Ventures’ rights as shareholder of 25% Unitel’s capital, as prescribed by the Shareholders’ Agreement. PT Ventures retains all its rights provided for in the Shareholders’ Agreement, including the right to appoint the majority of Unitel’s Board of Directors’ members and the right to receive Unitel’s past and future dividends.

Subsequently, at the General Shareholders’ Meeting of Unitel held on March 19, 2019 a new Board of Directors was elected consisting of five members, including two appointed by PT Ventures, one of whom will hold the position of Unitel’s General Director.

On August 12, 2019, PT Ventures was notified on the arbitration petition filed with the International Chamber of Commerce (“ICC”) by Vidatel Ltd. (“Vidatel”), on of Unitel’s shareholders against PT Ventures. In its petition, Vidatel seeks to challenge the 2019 Arbitration Award by submitting arguments relating to the recognition, effectiveness, and feasibility of said award and arguing that the Arbitration Award would have the effect of leading to the unjust enrichment of PT Ventures.

The Company believes that the arbitration proceeding initiated by Vidatel has a delaying tactic with the single goal of disrupting the enforcement of the 2019 Arbitration Award by reopening the discussion of matters that have already been discussed in the arbitration proceeding filed by PT Ventures against the other Unitel shareholders and terminated in February 2019.

Additionally, the Company believes that the ICC is not the appropriate forum to file an arbitration proceeding and analyze the problems alleged by Vidatel, not only because national courts have exclusive jurisdiction on these matters and also because these matters are not within the scope of the arbitration clause greed by Unitel’s shareholders, which prescribes that arbitration shall be used to settle disputes relating only to Unitel’s shareholders’ agreement and violations of Unitel’s shareholders’ agreement.

PT Ventures filed its response to the arbitration petition on September 11, 2019.

As disclosed to the market in a Material Fact Notice on January 24, 2020, on that date Africatel sold and transferred all PT Ventures shares to the Angolan company Sociedade Nacional de Combustíveis de Angola, Empresa Pública—Sonangol E.P. (Note 33). As a result of this operation, the Company is no longer bound by the ongoing litigation involving PT Ventures, Unitel, and Unitel’s other shareholders.

With regard to the indirect stake held by Africatel in Cabo Verde Telecom, S.A. (“CVT”), on May 21, 2019, PT Ventures sold, after the compliance with the conditions precedent, and transferred all the shares it held in CVT, representing 40% of CVT’s share capital, to the National Social Security Institute and state-owned company ASA – Empresa Nacional de Aeroportos e Segurança Aérea, S.A., both in Cabo Verde, for the total amount of US$26.3 million, as provided for in Clauses 3.1.3 and 5.1 of the JRP. This sale generated a net gain of R$67 million, recognized in profit or loss.

As a result of said share sale, PT Ventures entered into with the State of Cabo Verde, on the same date, an agreement for the definite termination of the arbitration proceedings filed by PT Ventures against the latter in March 2015, with the International Centre fore for Settlement of Investment Disputes (“ICSID”) and the International Chamber of Commerce (“ICC”).

Oi S.A. –Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

The group of assets and liabilities of the African operations are stated at the lower of their carrying amounts and their fair values less costs to sell, and are consolidated in the Company’s statement of profit or loss since May 5, 2014.

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial Reorganization – Debtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

The main components of the assets held sale and liabilities associated to assets held for sale of the African operations are as follows:

 

  Operations in Africa 
  2018   2017   2019(1)   2018 

Held-for-sale assets

   4,923,187    4,675,216    4,271,348    4,923,187 
  

 

   

 

 

Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments

   82,639    156,128 

Cash, cash equivalents and cash investments

   63,993    82,639 

Accounts receivable

   108,343    123,109    113,699    108,343 

Dividends receivable (i)

   2,566,935    2,012,146    2,435,014    2,566,935 

Held-for-sale financial asset (ii)

   1,843,778    1,965,972 

Held-for-sale asset (i)

   1,474,699    1,843,778 

Other assets

   145,709    123,865    74,300    145,709 

Deferred Income Tax

     54,540 

Investments

   19,414    42,217    4,916    19,414 

Property, plant and equipment

   108,768    149,176    83,400    108,768 

Intangible assets

   47,601    48,063    21,327    47,601 
  

 

   

 

 

Liabilities directly associated to assets held for sale

   526,871    354,127    491,225    526,870 
  

 

   

 

 

Borrowings and financing

   188    260    11,589    188 
  

 

   

 

 

Trade payables

   52,064    34,407    37,119    52,064 

Provisions for pension plans

     366 

Other liabilities

   474,619    319,094    442,517    474,618 
  

 

   

 

 

Non-controlling interests (iii)

   243,490    293,456 
  

 

   

 

 

Total held for sale assets, net of the corresponding liabilities

   4,152,826    4,027,633 
  

 

   

 

 

Non-controlling interests (ii)

   146,180    243,491 

Total held-for-sale assets, net of the corresponding liabilities

   3,633,943    4,152,826 

 

(1)

Thenon-operating companies started to consolidated in the balance sheet beginning December 31, 2019, whose assets and liabilities total R$326,229 and R$78,113, respectively (see Note 1 – Company subsidiaries).

(i)

This caption refers toRepresents the estimated recoverable amount of dividends and correspondent interests receivable from Unitel. As of December 31, 2018 gross amount of unpaid dividendsindirect interest held by Unitel to PT Ventures totaled US$821 millionin the dividends receivable and refers to the distribution of accumulated earnings in 2009 and the distribution of profits for fiscal years 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2017. In order to estimate the present value of the recoverable amount of unpaid dividends the Company takes into account (1) its legal advisors’ opinion regarding the outcome of the law suits filed in a Angolan’s Court and Paris’ ICC to collect this amounts from Unitel, (2) the liquidity position of Unitel as of December 31, 2017, (3) the decision of Unitel to accrue interests on the delayed payments and (4) a weight average cost of capital and an interest rate for accrual of interests;

(ii)

Refers mainly to the fair value of the indirect interest financial investment of 25% of Unitel’s share capital,in Unitel, both classified as held for sale. AsThe assets from the investment held in PT Ventures are measure substantially at December 31, 2018 the estimated fair value of the investment for sale, which occurred on January 23, 2020, as referred to above, in Unitel was R$1,760 million (R$1,920 million at December 31, 2017). The fair value of this investment is computed by the Company using a discounted cash-flow methodology, which includes (1) cash flows forecasts for a seven-year period, (2) a 1.5% growth rate to extrapolate the cash flows projections (1.5% in 2017), (3) exchange rate forecasts of Angolan Kwanza and (4) a weight average cost of capital of 17.6% (17.1% in 2017), which was computed based on financial market information and on the assessment of the management regarding the business environment and relationship with the others shareholders and Unitel itself. The Company monitors and periodically updates the main assumptions used in the fair value measurement considering the changes occurred in financial market conditions and the impacts of news events related to the investment, notably the lawsuits filed against Unitel and its shareholders in Angolan Courts and ICC Paris.Note 33;

(iii)(ii)

Represented mainly by the Samba Luxco’s 14% stake in Africatel and, consequently, in its net assets. In the first quarter of 2017, the transactions provided for in the contractual instruments entered into with Samba Luxco, which reduced its stake in Africatel, while Africatel transferred to Samba Luxco its entire stake in MTC.

 

(b)

Nonstrategic assets

The Company disclosed to the general market, through a material fact notice, its Strategic Plan, approved by the Board of Directors, focusing on the improvement of the operating and financial performance, using a sustainable business model, for the purpose of maximizing the Company’s value, in the context of the judicial reorganization proceeding. The plan prescribes that part of the financing of the investment strategy will be ensured by selling of the Company’s nonstrategic assets. These assets consist basically of: (i) Investment in Unitel, (ii) Towers; (iii) Datacenter; (iv) Properties; and (v) other nonstrategic assets. The Company is engaged in and focused on promoting the sale of said assets and will take all the necessary actions to implement said Plan in the coming periods.

In December 2019, the assets and liabilities associated with Real Estate and mobile Towers were stated inheld-for-sale assets, in line with the Company’s strategic plan and intention. Management assessed and determined that the other nonstrategic assets do not substantially meet the presentation and measurement requirements set forth by IFRS 5,Held-for-Sale Noncurrent Assets and Discontinued Operations, and therefore continue to be stated in the group ‘Property, Plant and Equipment’ (Note 16).

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

32.

OTHER INFORMATION

(a)

Agreements entered into by the Company, TmarPart, and Pharol related to the cash investments made in Rio Forte commercial papers

On June 30, 2014, the Company was informed, through a market notice disclosed by Pharol, of the investment made by PTIF and PT Portugal (both, collectively, “Oi Subsidiaries”), companies contributed by Pharol to Oi in the Company’s capital increase in May 2014, in a commercial paper of Rio Forte Investments S.A. (“Securities” and “Rio Forte”, respectively), a company part of the Portuguese group Espírito Santo (“GES”), when both PTIF and PT Portugal were Pharol subsidiaries.

In December 2018, annual impairment tests were conducted basedlight of the default of the Securities by Rio Forte, on September 8, 2014, after obtaining the proper corporate approvals, the Company, the Oi Subsidiaries, TmarPart, and Pharol entered into definitive agreements related to the investments made in the Securities. The agreements provided for (i) an exchange (the “Exchange”) through which Oi Subsidiaries would transfer the Securities to Pharol in exchange for preferred and common shares of the Company held by Pharol, as well as (ii) the assignment by Oi Subsidiaries of a call option on the internal valuation made, including cash flows forecasts forCompany shares to the benefit of PT (“Call Option”).

On March 31, 2015, the Company published a five-year period, the choice of a growth rate to extrapolate the cash flows projections, and definition of an appropriate discount rate, calculated basedMaterial Fact Notice on the weight average costcompletion of capitalthe Exchange.

The Option became vested with the completion of from 15.3%the Exchange, beginning March 31, 2015, exercisable at any time, over asix-year period, and the number of shares covered by the Option will be decreased at each March 31st.

Up to 21.2%, taking into consideration Africans business environment.March 31, 2020, Pharol had not exercised the Option, in whole or in part, on the Shares Subject to the Option. Accordingly, the following are no longer subject to the Option: (i) beginning March 31, 2016, 4,743,487 common shares and 9,486,974 preferred shares issued by the Company, equivalent to 10% of the Shares Subject to the Option; (ii) beginning March 31, 2017, another 8,538,277 common shares and 17,076,554, equivalent to 18% of the Shares Subject to the Option; (iii) beginning March 31, 2018, another 8,538,277 common shares and 17,076,554 preferred shares equivalent to 18% of the Shares Subject to the Option; (iv) beginning March 31, 2019, another 8,538,277 common shares and 17,076,554 preferred shares, equivalent to 18% of the Shares Subject to the Option; and (v) beginning March 31, 2020, another 8,538,277 common shares and 17,076,554 preferred shares, equivalent to 18% of the Shares Subject to the Option. There are also 8,538,277 common shares and 17,076,554 preferred shares subject to the Option and Pharol will no longer be entitled to exercise the Option on them on March 31, 2021.

As at December 31, 2019, the fair value of the Call Option is estimated at R$117 million calculated by the Company using theBlack-Scholes model and theoretical share volatility assumptions, using the Revenue Approach valuation technique laid down by paragraphs B10 and B11 of IFRS 13—Fair Value Measurement.

 

27.(b)

OTHER INFORMATIONPunitive Administrative Proceedings at the CVM

In December 2018, we became aware that the Penalty Proceedings Authority and CVM’s Specialized Federal Attorney had issued Punitive Administrative Proceedings Reports proposing that certain executives, directors, and shareholders be held accountableCVM, in the exercise of its duties, initiated two punitive administrative proceedings for the alleged violations of the Brazilian Corporate Law (Law 6404/1976)acts conducted in connection with the facts related to thecorporate restructuring betweenannounced in October 2013 involving Oi and Pharol (former Portugal Telecom) announced in October 2013, and the capital increase through the public offer for distribution of Oi shares completedconcluded in May 2014.2014, for an alleged breach of the Corporate Law, to hold liable certain executives, officers and controlling shareholders at the time of the events.

The Company is not a party to these proceedings. As forWith regard to the mentionedindicted executives, if they are considered accountableheld liable in these Punitive Administrative Proceedings, they will be subject to a penalty, that canwhich may range from a warning to interdiction, for a period oftemporary disqualification, during up to 20 years, to act ashold a management or member of the supervisory board position of a boardpublicly-held company, entity of directorsthe securities distribution system, or executive committeeother entities that depend of publicly-held corporations in Brazil.CVM authorization or registration.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

28.(c)

REORGANIZATION ITEMS, NETOperation:Mapa da Mina

TransactionsOn December 10, 2019, the Brazilian Federal Police launched the 69th phase Operation:Lava Jato (Car Wash), named “Operation:Mapa da Mina” (Mine Plan) (Criminal Search and Seizure Order No.5024872-64,2018.4.04.7000/PR—13th Federal Criminal Court of Curitiba), one of the main targets of which was Fábio da Silva, son of former president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. The investigation, which has neither the Company nor any of its current officers as defendants, is based on a suspected transfer of several companies to Gamecorp and Grupo Gol, in exchange for alleged benefits from the Federal Government. As a result of such investigation, Company buildings in the States of São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro, and in Brasília were searched and documented were seized. Since then, the Company has cooperated with the investigations by making all the clarifications and delivering all the documents requested. On March 12, 2020, the 4th Region Federal Court granted an habeas corpus (Habeas Corpus No.5052647-8.2019.4.04.000/PR) was granted, requiring that the records of said Operation be sent to the São Paulo Judiciary Section, after concluding that there was no connection between the facts reported in the investigation and those verified in Operation: “Lava Jato”. Internally, the Company informs that since 2015 it has retained the law firm Tozzini Freire Advogados as external independent auditor to conduct a forensic investigation addressing all the allegations in the case file, which has updated these analyses due in light to the new facts pointed out in Operation: “Mapa da Mina”. Such investigations were completed without evidence of illegal actions committed by Company representatives.

Among the initiatives undertaken, the Company has created a Multidisciplinary Committee consisting of members from different departments, such as the legal, compliance, internal audit and accounting department, to determine the main procedures to be performed, and set a schedule of relevant activities in response to the allegations of said investigation involving the Company and its subsidiaries. In this regard, the Multidisciplinary Committee determined the following procedures: (i) retain a renowned, specialized law firm, independent from the Company and its subsidiaries, to conduct an internal investigation on the allegations made in the Federal Public Prosecution Office (MPF) and the Brazilian Federal Police (PF) investigations; (ii) request an assessment by the outside legal counsel of the results of said internal investigation to be conducted by the specialized law firm, if applicable; (iii) request an assessment by the outside legal counsel of possible legal and regulatory impacts in Brazil and in the United States, regarding all allegations made in the investigation, considering the applicable anticorruption legislation and/or illegal activities; (iv) request an assessment by the compliance department to determine whether any material weaknesses in the internal control environment existing at the time covered by the investigations still persist in the current Company governance and internal control scenario; (v) conduct periodic meetings to follow up on the status of the assessments to be carried out; and (vi) submit of the results of all assessments to be carried out to the members of the Audit, Risk and Controls Committee (“CARC”), which reports to the Company’s Board of Directors. In this context, the specialized law firm concluded its internal independent investigation in February 2020. Based on interviews, information and documentation submitted by the Company’s management, and due to the constraints imposed by the time period covered by said investigation (2003-2019), no indications of illegalities committed by the Company were identified linked to the allegations made by the MPF and the PF in Operation: “Mapa da Mina” investigation. This internal use report was extensively discussed and presented to the members of the Multidisciplinary Committee, as well as to the members of the CARC.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

33.

EVENTS AFTER THE REPORTING PERIOD

(a)

Sale of investment in PT Ventures

After obtaining the proper approvals by the Company’s Board of Directors, the competent corporate bodies of Africatel and the Judicial Reorganization Court, on January 24, 2020, Africatel sold and transferred all shares issued by PT Ventures to the Angolan company Sociedade Nacional de Combustíveis de Angola, Empresa Pública—Sonangol E.P., as provided for in the Company’s Judicial Reorganization Plan and Strategic Plan (Note 31 (b)).

On the transaction date, PT Ventures held stakes in the Angolan companies Unitel (25%) and Multitel—Serviços de Telecomunicações Lda. (40%), as well as credit rights of dividends declared by Unitel and already past due and a set of rights resulting from the final decision rendered by the Arbitration Court installed under the Arbitration Rules of the International Chamber of Commerce (“ICC”), within the scope of the arbitration initiated by PT Ventures at the ICC against the other Unitel shareholders, as disclosed by the Company in a Material Fact Notice on February 28, 2019.

The total amount of the transaction was US$1 billion, of which (i) US$699.1 million was paid to Africatel by Sonangol on January 24, 2020; (ii) Africatel was paid US$60.9 million prior to the transfer of PT Ventures’ shares; and (iii) US$240 million, fully guaranteed by a guarantee letter issued by a prime bank, will be paid unconditionally by Sonangol to Africatel until July 31, 2020, with a minimum monthly flow of US$40 million assured to Africatel as from February 2020. The Company reiterates that the contractually assured flow was duly met in February and March 2020 by Sonangol.

As at December 31, 2019, the assets from the investment held in PT Ventures are measured substantially at the fair value of the investment for sale.

(b)

Commitment to sell a property

As disclosed to the market on January 30, 2020 and February 26, 2020, the Company sold a property it owned, located at Rua General Polidoro nº 99, Botafogo, in the city of Rio de Janeiro, to Alianza Gestão de Recursos Ltda., for the amount of R$120.5 million, on February 21, 2020, as part of its project to sell noncore assets, as set forth by the Company’s Judicial Reorganization Plan and Strategic Plan (Note 31 (b)).

The operation was authorized by the Judicial Reorganization Court, after obtaining the favorable opinion of the Rio de Janeiro State Public Prosecution Office and the Judicial Administrator. Likewise, ANATEL confirmed the removal of the Property from the Company’s List of Reversible Assets.

(c)

Third-party expressions of interest on the Company’s Mobile business

On March 10, 2020, the Company disclosed to the general market in a material fact notice, that its financial advisor, Bank of America Merrill Lynch (“BofA”) received statements from third parties expressions of interest in the Company’s mobile business. To date, however, there is no commitment from the Company or any of these third parties to proceed with such sale and no binding instrument has been entered into to this respect. Even though there may be future developments in the analysis for a potential formal negotiation process, the Company continues to analyze all the existing alternatives that may bring more efficiency to the implementation of its Strategic Plan.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

(d)

Potential Effects ofCOVID-19 Pandemic

Since December 2019, a COVID-19 has spread throughout the world. On January 31, 2020, the World Health Organization announced that COVID-19 was a global health emergency and on March 3, 2020, the World Health Organization categorized COVID-19 as a pandemic. The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in numerous deaths and the imposition of local, municipal and national governmental “shelter-in-place” and other quarantine measures, border closures and other travel restrictions, causing unprecedented economic disruption in much of the world, including in Brazil.

The local, national and international response to the virus is quickly developing, fluid and uncertain. During March and April of 2020, state, local and municipal authorities within Brazil promoted and enforced social isolation and quarantine measures and have enacted regulations limiting the operations of “non-essential” businesses. In mid-March 2020, Rio de Janeiro and other Brazilian states declared states of emergency. In accordance with the recommendations of the authorities, the Company transitioned a substantial majority of its employees to work from home.

Although the COVID-19 pandemic has no effect on the Company historical results of operations, there are many potential effects of this pandemic on its short- and medium- term business operations and, consequently, its results of operations. In March 2020, the Company established a crisis response team to focus on ensuring the full business continuity of its operations, the health and safety of its employees, and the establishment of a formal process to monitor, analyze and respond to the potential impacts of the pandemic.

As of the date of this annual report, the Company has detected few cases of COVID-19 in its employees and the human resources department monitors suspected or confirmed cases. As one a measure designed to protect its employees, the Company has instituted a “work-from-home” policy for all of its employees for whom the demands of their work permit this arrangement, constituting approximately 84% of its work force, and have been able to do so without any interruption of their activities. For its remaining employees, for example, the Company field service technicians and operators in its call centers, the Company has complied with all health care recommendations of the World Health Organization and the Brazilian Ministry of Health.

The Brazilian government has determined that the telecom sector is an essential service, which allows the Company to continue its field maintenance activities without violating restrictions on movement that have generally been imposed to combat the pandemic.

Although there has not been sufficient history with the Company operations under the pandemic and the related public health measures to provide significant analysis of the potential financial impact of the pandemic or the governmental and popular response to the pandemic, the Company belives that demand for telecommunications services, including services provided by the Company during the pandemic has grown significantly. In order to service this demand and to ensure continuity of its services, the Company moved quickly to activate new circuits in its backbone infrastructure and has not experienced any significant decline in the operation and reliability of its networks.

Since the outbreak of the pandemic, the Company has closed its retail stores and many of its distribution channels for the Company’s mobile service have been unable to operate, although some of its physical points-of-sale, such as grocery stores, pharmacies and convenience stores, have continued to operate. As a result, the Company believes that new activations by mobile customers will be substantially reduced for the quarantine period. However, as these store closures affect all operators in the mobile business equally, the Company expects that there will be substantially reduced levels of churn during this period. In addition, the Company expects that revenue for SIM card recharges will be adversely affected for the quarantine period as the number of points-of-sale that offer these services has been substantially reduced.

Since the outbreak of the pandemic, the Company has curtailed significantly its door-to-door sales channel for residential services, including broadband, but has been able to maintain its telemarketing and teleagent sales channels. The Company has experienced a significant surge in demand for its broadband services, including services delivered through its expanding FTTH network, both from residential and B2B customers as they establish remote work operations. Because its sales channels for these services depend less on physical presence in sales locations than its mobile services, the Company does not expect the reduction in new activations or upgrades in services to be affected to the same degree as in its mobile services.

The Company expects that the public health measures adopted in Brazil will have significant impacts on the income and purchasing power of many of its subscribers, particularly low-income subscribers and SMEs, some of whom may cease operations, although the Company has not yet been able to gather data to analyze the extent of these impacts. In addition, the Company has begun to experience some delays in payment for its corporate and governmental customers. As a result, the Company expects an increase in late-payments, customer defaults and expected losses on trade receivables. The Company has instituted some measures to assist its customers during the pandemic, for example, providing deferrals of payment deadlines by up to 10 days upon request of its customers and entering into payment plans with some of its customers under which it will forbear the collection of interest and late charges. These measures are likely to have an adverse effect on revenue and operating cash flow during the period over which they are effective, although the Company does not have sufficient experience with the effects of these measures to reliably estimate the quantitative effects of these measures.

The Company continues to monitor the effects of COVID-19 and the public health measures adopted in Brazil on its results of operations and cash flows to assess whether any of its assets have been impaired. As of the date of this annual report, the Company does not have sufficient history with its operations under the pandemic and the related public health measures to assess whether any impairment of its assets will be required.

The Company does not expect significant negative effects on its ongoing maintenance activities and FTTH expansion project as a result of the pandemic and the public health measures introduced to combat the pandemic. The Company has experienced some negative effects relating to the deployment of field teams, primarily related to the difficulty of obtaining lodging and meals and, in some instances, the difficulty in arranging transportation between cities, due to the public health restrictions. However, as a result of the determination that the telecom sector is an essential service, the general public health restrictions applicable to the population have not generally applied to the Company staff of field technicians.

The Company continues to have regular communications with its equipment vendors to assess the impacts of the pandemic on their production and inventories to ensure that deliveries of equipment will continue to be made on a timely basis. As of the date of this annual report, the Company has not suffered any negative impacts in its supply chain for equipment and has not been advised that any significant disruptions are expected.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

34.

RECONCILIATION BETWEEN U.S. GAAP AND IFRS

The Company prepares its local financial statements in accordance with IFRS, and the pronouncements, guidelines and interpretations issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB).

As the company is presenting its financial statements under IFRS for SEC reporting purposes after several years of presenting them under US GAAP, it is providing a reconciliation of its 2018 and 2017 US GAAP financial statements to IFRS.

ACCOUNTING DIFFERENCES BETWEEN U.S. GAAP AND IFRS

The financial statements of the Company were prepared in accordance with accounting policies generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). Differences between these accounting policies and practices adopted in International Financial Reporting Standard—IFRS, where applicable to Oi, are summarized below:

(a)

Impairment of long-lived assets

In accordance with FASB ASC 360, long-lived assets, such as property, plant, and equipment, and purchased intangibles subject to amortization, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset.

In accordance with IAS 36 Impairment of assets, such as property, plant, and equipment, and purchased intangibles subject to amortization, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset or group of assets may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset or group of assets to the fair value of the asset or group of assets.

Therefore, regarding impairment of long-lived assets there is an accounting difference between U.S. GAAP and IFRS namely the recognition of impairment under IFRS.

On December 31, 2018, under U.S. GAAP, no impairment losses were recognized and under IFRS an accumulated provision for impairment losses, amounting to R$1,226,125, were recorded in the balance sheet as a result of the difference on the impairment methodology between the two standards.

The net effect on net income, as of December 31, 2018, was R$141,418, which includes the accounting differences related to the provision for impairment recorded under IFRS in amounting to R$291,807 compared no impairment losses recorded under USGAAP, and the effects of depreciation and amortization related to the acumulated effects of no recorded impairment losses under USGAAP, in amounting to R$150,389.

(b)

Business combinations prior to January 1, 2009

Under U.S. GAAP, for the acquisitions of interests in Pegasus,Way-TV, Paggo and TNCP (Amazônia) that occurred prior to January 1, 2009, the Company adopted the procedures determined by FASB ASC 805 Business Combinations, resulting in a difference as compared to the Company’s accounting policy in force prior to that date. The accounting method used under U.S. GAAP in business combination transactions is the “purchase method”, which requires that acquirers reasonably determine the fair-value of the identifiable assets and liabilities of acquired companies, individually, to determine goodwill paid.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

Since IFRS 3Business Combinations was effective to business combinations for which the acquisition date was on or after January 1, 2009, under IFRS for all business combinations prior that, the Company typically recognized the difference between the purchase price and the historical book value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as goodwill, which was amortized over the estimated period over which the Company expected to benefit from the goodwill. This period was determined based on the reasons attributed by management for the payment of goodwill. A test for impairment is made at least annually or if there is an indication that the unit in which the goodwill was allocated may be impaired.

Therefore, regarding the business combinations prior to January 1, 2009 there is an accounting difference between U.S. GAAP and IFRS namely the computation of goodwill, recognition of intangible assets and amortization of goodwill.

(c)

Pension plans and other post-retirement benefits

The Company applies FASB ASC 715—Retirement Benefits, which requires an employer to recognize the overfunded status or funded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan as an asset or liability in its balance sheet and to recognize changes in that funded status in the year in which the changes occur through other comprehensive income.

The overfunded status of the pension plans is presented as a prepaid asset. Unrecognized net gain or losses are recognized following the “10% corridor approach”. Deferred actuarial gains and losses outside the 10% corridor are amortized over the average remaining service period of active employees or, when all or almost all participants are inactive, over the average remaining life expectancy of those participants.

Under IFRS, if a plan has an overfunded status, which is not expected to generate future benefits, the company does not recognize the funded status, unless in case of express authorization for offsetting with future employer contribution. Remeasurement of gains and losses, including actuarial gains and losses, must be recognized immediately in OCI and are not subsequently recognized (or recycled) into net income.

Therefore, regarding pension plans and other post-retirement benefits there is an accounting difference between U.S. GAAP and IFRS namely: (i) the recognized overfunded status under U.S. GAAP, and (ii) the result from the use of the “10% corridor approach” which is not applicable under IFRS.

(d)

Capitalization of interest, net of amortization

Under U.S. GAAP, capitalized interest is added to the individual assets and is amortized over their estimated useful lives. The Company capitalizes only interest expenses to the extent that borrowings do not exceed the balances of constructionin-progress, as generally foreign exchange differences are not eligible for being recorded as part of the cost of the asset.

Under IFRS, financial charges on obligations financing assets and construction works in progress are capitalized, including interest expenses and certain foreign exchange differences.

Therefore, regarding capitalization of interest, net of amortization, there is an accounting difference between U.S. GAAP and IFRS namely the impact of capitalization of foreign exchange under IFRS.

(e)

Provision for onerous contracts

Under U.S. GAAP, future losses on firmly committed executory contracts (onerous contracts) typically are not recognized. Losses are recognized only when incurred.

Under IFRSs, an entity is required to recognize and measure the present obligation under an onerous contract as a provision. An onerous contract is one “in which the unavoidable costs of meeting the obligations under the contract exceed the economic benefits expected to be received under it”.

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

The Company is party to a telecommunications signals transmission capacity supply agreement using submarine cables that connect North America and South America. Since the agreement’s obligations exceed the economic benefits that are expected to be received throughout the agreement and the costs are unavoidable, the Company recognized in 2018, pursuant to IAS 37, an onerous obligation measured at the lowest of net output cost of the agreement brought to present value, in the amount of R$ 4,493,894.

Therefore, regarding provision for onerous contracts there is an accounting difference between U.S. GAAP and IFRS namely the recognition of a provision that does not exist under U.S. GAAP.

(f)

Settlement ofJudicial Reorganization

U.S. GAAP

Under U.S. GAAP, the company has applied the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 852 Reorganizations in preparing its consolidated financial statements. Under ASC 852, the company adopted the following accounting procedures:

Prepetition obligations impacted by the judicial reorganization proceedings had been classified on the balance sheet as liabilities subject to compromise in 2017. These liabilities were reported as the amounts expected to be allowed by the Judicial Reorganization Court, even if they were settled for lesser amounts;

Interest accruing on unsecured debt subsequent to the date of petition is not an allowed claim and therefore has not been accrued;

Foreign currency denominated liabilities in Reais using the applicable foreign currency translation rate as of the petition date. As a result there is no foreign currency translation adjustments recorded after the petition date related to prepetition liabilities under U.S. GAAP; and

Liabilities subject to compromise and other impacts from ASC 852 reorganizations

As a result of the filing of the Bankruptcy Petitions, the company has applied the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 852Reorganizationsin preparing U.S. GAAP consolidated financial statements. ASC 852 requires that financial statements distinguish transactions and events that are directly associated with the reorganization are required, under the guidance of ASC 852 Reorganizations, to be separately disclosed and distinguished from those of the ongoing operations of the business. The Company usedAccordingly, certain expenses, realized gains and losses and provisions for losses that are realized or incurred in the classification “Reorganization items, net” onjudicial reorganization proceedings have been recorded in a reorganization line item in the consolidated statements of operationsoperations. In addition, the prepetition obligations that could be impacted by the judicial reorganization proceedings were classified on the balance sheet as liabilities subject to compromise. These liabilities were reported as the amounts expected allowed by the Judicial Reorganization Court, even if they could be settled for lesser amounts.

The amounts initially recorded as liabilities subject to compromise were subsequently adjusted and reclassified to reflect expenses, gainsthe new legal terms and lossesconditions established by the JRP Court and as of December 31, 2018 there are no outstanding liabilities subject to compromise.

On December 31, 2018, the Company did not emerge from bankruptcy, due to certain material unsatisfied conditions, which relates to additional capital increase that are the direct result of the reorganization of its business.occurred on January 25, 2019.

 

   2018   2017   2016 

Gain on restructuring of Qualified Bonds

   12,881,478     

Adjustment to present value – Borrowings and financing

   13,928,661     

Adjustment to present value – Anatel (AGU) and other payables

   5,577,234     

Anatel provision for contingencies

     (1,568,798   (6,604,718

Other provision for contingencies (a)

   (347,437   (1,146,458   (2,349,898

Income from short-term investments

   174,281    713,276    201,533 

Professional fees (b)

   (633,676   (369,938   (252,915
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total reorganization items, net

   31,580,541    (2,371,918   (9,005,998
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(a)

These amounts are the result of the adjustment to record contingent liabilities to their allowed claim amount, which is difference than their carrying amount prior to the JR Proceedings.

(b)

During the year ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 the Company incurred in R$634 million, R$370 million and R$253 million related to professional advisors who are assisting with the bankruptcy process, respectively.

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

29.

LIABILITIES SUBJECT TO COMPROMISE

As a result of the judicial reorganization proceedings in Brazil and other international jurisdictions (which are considered to be similar in all substantive respects to Chapter 11) prepetition liabilities, as shown below were classified as subject to compromise based on the assessment of these obligations following the guidance ofASC 852 Reorganizations. Prepetition liabilities subject to compromise arewere required to be reported at the amount expected to be allowed as a claim by the Judicial Reorganization Court, regardless of whether they maycould be settled for lesser amounts and remain subject to future adjustments based on negotiated settlements with claimants, actions of the Judicial Reorganization Court, rejection of executory contracts, proofs of claims or other events. The following table reflects prepetition liabilities subject to compromise recorded under U.S. GAAP purpose as at December 31, 2018 and 2017:

 

   2018   2017 

Borrowings and financing

   —      49,129,546 

Derivative financial instrument

   —      104,694 

Trade payables

   —      2,139,312 

Provision for civil contingencies - Anatel

   —      9,333,795 

Provision for pension plan

   —      560,046 

Other

   —      43,334 

Provision for labor contingencies

   —      899,226 

Provision for civil - other claims

   —      2,929,275 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Liabilities subject to compromise (*)

   —      65,139,228 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
December 31, 2018December 31, 2017

Borrowings and financing

—  49,129,547

Derivative financial instrument

—  104,694

Trade payables

—  2,139,312

Provision for civil contingencies—Anatel

—  9,333,795

Provision for pension plan

—  560,046

Other

—  43,333

Provision for labor contingencies

—  899,226

Provision for civil—other claims

—  2,929,275

 

(*)

The total amount of prepetition liabilities subjected to compromise differs from the R$63,960,008 amount of the Creditors List prepared by the Company and filed on May 29, 2017. Per ASC 852, prepetition liabilities

Liabilities subject to compromise included the best estimate, as per the criteria set forth in ASC 450, of contingencies/claims subject to compromise and that in accordance with the Brazilian Law were not included in the Creditor’s List.(*)

—  65,139,228

Reorganization items, net

Transactions and events directly associated with the reorganization were required, under the guidance of ASC 852 Reorganizations, to separate disclosed and distinguished from those of the ongoing operations of the business. Under U.S. GAAP purposes the Company used the classification “Reorganization items, net” on the consolidated statements of operations to reflect expenses, gains and losses that were the direct result of the reorganization of its business.

   December 31, 2018  December 31, 2017 

Gain on restructuring of Qualified Bonds

   12,881,478  

Adjustment to fair value—Borrowings and financing

   13,928,661  

Adjustment to present value—Anatel (AGU) and other payables

   5,577,234  

Anatel provision for contingencies

    (1,568,798

Other provision for contingencies (a)

   (347,437  (1,146,458

Income from short-term investments

   174,281   713,276 

Professional fees (b)

   (633,676  (369,938

Total reorganization items, net

   31,580,541   (2,371,918

Recognition of the effects of the ratification of the Judicial Reorganization Plan under U.S. GAAP

AsUnder U.S. GAAP, as a result of the approval of JRP at the GCM meeting held on December 19 and 20, 2017 and its subsequent ratification by the Judicial Reorganization Court on January 8, 2018, and published on the Official Gazette on February 5, 2018, the Company’s management, based on the terms and conditions of the JRP, recorded the effects caused by the restructuring/novation of the prepetition liabilities subject to the Judicial Reorganization in the consolidated financial statements for year ended December 31, 2018.

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

The movements in the restructured prepetition liabilities and the accounting adjustments made for initial recognition of the terms and conditions set forth by the approved and ratified JRP, including the effects on the fair value of these liabilities pursuant to the criteria of ASC 820, and applicable GAAP, are as follow:

 

  12/31/2017   Reclassifications Mediations
and other
 

Haircut

(i)

 

Equity

(ii)

 Present value
(iii)
 Financial
charges (iv)
   12/31/2018   December 31,
2017

U.S. GAAP
   Reclassifications Mediations
and other
 Haircut
(i)
 Equity
(ii)
 Fair value /
Present
value (iii)
 Financial
charges
(iv)
   December 31,
2018

U.S. GAAP
 

Liabilities subject to compromise

                      

Bondholders

   32,314,638    (32,314,638  —     —     —     —     —      —      32,314,638    (32,314,638  —     —     —     —     —      —   

BNDES

   3,326,952    (3,326,952  —     —     —     —     —      —      3,326,952    (3,326,952  —     —     —     —     —      —   

Other Borrowings and financing

   13,487,957    (13,487,957  —     —     —     —     —      —      13,487,957    (13,487,957  —     —     —     —     —      —   

Derivative financial instrument

   104,694    (104,694  —     —     —     —     —      —      104,694    (104,694  —     —     —     —     —      —   

Trade payables

   2,139,312    (2,139,312  —     —     —     —     —      —      2,139,312    (2,139,312  —     —     —     —     —      —   

Provision for civil contingencies - Anatel

   9,333,795    (9,333,795  —     —     —     —     —      —   

Provision for civil contingencies—Anatel

   9,333,795    (9,333,795  —     —     —     —     —      —   

Provision for pension plan

   560,046    (560,046  —     —     —     —     —      —      560,046    (560,046  —     —     —     —     —      —   

Other

   43,333    (43,333  —     —     —     —     —      —      43,333    (43,333  —     —     —     —     —      —   

Provision for labor contingencies

   899,226    (1,036,172 136,946   —     —     —     —      —      899,226    (1,036,172 136,946   —     —     —     —      —   

Provision for civil - other claims

   2,929,275    (2,218,538 (710,737  —     —     —     —      —   

Provision for civil—other claims

   2,929,275    (2,218,538 (710,737  —     —     —     —      —   
  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

 

Total - Liabilities subject to compromise

   65,139,228    (64,565,437  (573,791  —     —     —     —      —   

Total—Liabilities subject to compromise

   65,139,228    (64,565,437  (573,791  —     —     —     —      —   
  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

 

Bondholders

   —      32,314,638  (161,600 (11,054,800 (11,613,980 (4,807,262 2,035,699    6,712,695    —      32,314,638  (161,600 (11,054,800 (11,613,980 (4,807,262 2,035,699    6,712,695 

BNDES – Borrowings and financing

   —      3,326,952   —     —     —     —    289,122    3,616,074    —      3,326,952   —     —     —     —    289,122    3,616,074 

Other Borrowings and financing

   —      13,592,651  50,375   —     —    (9,121,399 1,599,510    6,121,137    —      13,592,651  50,375   —     —    (9,121,399 1,599,510    6,121,137 

Anatel (AGU) and other trade payables

   —      10,588,661  445,077  (1,826,678  —    (5,577,234 164,784    3,794,610    —      10,588,661  445,077  (1,826,678  —    (5,577,234 164,784    3,794,610 

Provision for labor, civil and Anatel contingencies

   —      4,182,489  56,975   —     —     —    149,173    4,388,637    —      4,182,489  56,975   —     —     —    149,173    4,388,637 

Provision for pension plan

   —      560,046   —     —     —     —    14,679    574,725    —      560,046   —     —     —     —    14,679    574,725 
  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

 

Total - Liabilities not subject to compromise

   —      64,565,437   390,827   (12,881,478  (11,613,980  (19,505,895  4,252,967    25,207,878 

Total—Liabilities not subject to compromise

   —      64,565,437   390,827   (12,881,478  (11,613,980  (19,505,895  4,252,967    25,207,878 
  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

 

 

(i)

Represent gains on restructuring of borrowings and financings, trade payables owing toANATEL-AGU and other trade payables, as a result of the JR Proceedings.

(ii)

Represent the fair value of shares issued in partial settlement of the Senior Notes (Note 22).Notes.

(iii)

The financial liabilities have been adjusted to presentfair value according to the criteria of ASC 852 as of the time at which it has reclassified each of the financial liabilities that were legally affected by the JRP from liabilities subject to compromise to borrowings and financings or trade payables. It was calculated taking into consideration the contractual flows provided for in the JRP, discounted using rates that range from 12.6% per year to 16.4% per year, depending on the maturities and currency of each instrument.

(iv)

Represent the contractual interest and foreign currency fluctuation calculated after completed the financial debt restructuring and other claims restructuring in the terms and conditions provided in the JRP.

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

IFRS

Under IFRS, there is no specific guidance for accounting Bankruptcy Petitions as there is under U.S. GAAP. Financial liabilities were recorded as before the Bankruptcy Petition, including the accrual of interest based on the contracts, the recognition of foreign currency translation and the recognition of provisions based on expected payment cash outflow (IAS 37 for liability provisions). Liabilities subject to compromise were classified on the balance sheet as Current Liabilities. Any differences between the settlement of the liability and its carrying amount were reorganized upon settlement of the JRP and recorded in the Consolidated Income Statement at such time.

Because all liabilities subject to compromise were settled in 2018 under the conditions of the JRP, no GAAP differences compared to IFRS exist for the balances of liabilities after the settlement date.

Therefore, regarding settlement of judicial reorganization the only accounting difference between U.S. GAAP and IFRS are namely: (i) the impacts of settlement and fair value of liabilities for adopting ASC 852 under U.S. GAAP that needs to be excluded under IFRS; and (ii) the gain recognition on reversal of interest and foreign currency on loans and financings under IFRS.

The following is a summary of the Judicial Reorganization proceedings, claims are classified in one of four classesadjustments to net income for the year ended December 31, 2018 and the treatment of claims under the JRP is differentiated for each of these classes:2017:

 

Class I – labor-related claims;

Class II – secured claims;

Class III – unsecured claims, statutorily or generally privileged claims, and subordinated claims; and

Class IV – claims held by “small companies” under Brazilian law.

Judicial reorganization

  December 31,
2018
  December 31,
2017
 

Settlement for lesser amounts of prepetition obligations and fair value recognition under U.S. GAAP

   (6,527,238  73,135 

Gain on reversal of interest and foreign currency on loans and financings under IFRS

   5,196,222   6,429,611 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   (1,331,016  (6,502,746
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

30.(g)

SUBSEQUENT EVENTSDeferred income tax

Market arbitration chamber proceeding

On February 28, 2018, oneThis relates to the impact of recalculation of the Company’s shareholders, Bratel filed a petition withdeferred tax assets and liabilities considering the Market Arbitration Chamber (Câmara de Arbitragem do Mercado)adjusted balances of B3 requesting an arbitration, alleging that certain provisionsaccounts and related impacts on net income and the revised valuation allowance based on the reassessed schedule of expected generation of future taxable income under IFRS.

SUMARY OF ACCOUNTING DIFFERENCES BETWEEN U.S. GAAP AND IFRS

The reconciliations below quantify the effect of the JRP, includingU.S. GAAP to IFRS on the Capital Increase - Capitalization of Claims, the Capital Increase - New Funds and the changes to the Company’s corporate governance structure, should have been submitted to and approved by an extraordinary general shareholders’ meeting of the Company (“EGM”), which did not take place prior to the Judicial Ratification of the JRP by the RJ Court. On March 7, 2018, The Company filed a conflict of jurisdiction petition before the Second Section of the Superior Court of Justice, among other things, challenging the jurisdiction of the Market Arbitration Chamber to decide on matters pertaining to the JRP. On October 10, 2018, the Second Section of the Superior Court of Justice decided by majority vote that the Market Arbitration Chamber had jurisdiction to resolve disputes among the Company and its shareholders. On October 26, 2018, an emergency arbitrator (árbitro de apoio) appointed by the Market Arbitration Chamber, or the Emergency Arbitrator, issued an order suspending the authorization by the Company’s board of directors on that date of the capital increase, until the next decision to be rendered by the Emergency Arbitrator. On November 6, 2018, the Emergency Arbitrator overturned its prior decision to suspend the authorization of the capital increase, allowing the Company to continue to implement the capital increase.

On January 8, 2019, the Company and its subsidiaries Telemar and PT Participações and Pharol and its wholly-owned subsidiary Bratel entered into a settlement agreement for the termination of all court andoff-court litigation involving the companies of both groups, in Brazil and abroad.

The terms and conditions of the settlement agreement, approved by both groups’ boards of directors, as summarized below:

I. Terms and conditions to be met by the Company:indicated dates:

 

a)

Payment of €25 million to Pharol;

Reconciliation

     Equity  Net income 
     December 31,
2018
  December 31,
2017
  December 31,
2018
  December 31,
2017
 

Under U.S.GAAP

    29,199,496   (9,684,061  27,393,837   (4,027,661

Impairment of long-lived assets

   (a  (1,226,125  (1,084,707  (141,418  5,526,563 

Business combinations prior to January 1, 2009

   (b  44,981   40,859   4,122   4,313 

Pension plans and other post-retirement benefits

   (c  (689,574  (1,598,792  (115,080  (197,700

Capitalization of interest, net of amortization

   (d  60,928   62,711   (1,780  (9,322

Provision for onerous contracts

   (e  (4,493,895   (4,493,895 

Settlement of judicial reorganization

   (f   1,331,016   (1,331,016  (6,502,746

Deferred income tax

   (g   (2,579,548  3,300,785   (1,449,609
   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Under IFRS

    22,895,811   (13,512,522  24,615,555   (6,656,162
   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

b)

Delivery to Pharol of 33.8 million Company shares held in treasury;

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

c)

The Company shall assume all the costs on court guarantees related to Pharol’s lawsuits in Portugal,

Reconciliation of balance sheet as per the assumed obligation;

d)

In the event of the sale of the Company’s stake in Unitel, the Company shall deposit in a Pharol guarantee account an amount to cover possible unfavorable outcome in tax contingencies the likelihood of which is probable, as per the assumed obligations.

II. Terms and conditions to be met by Pharol:

a)

Use of at least €25 million to make a subscription in the Company’s Capital Increase – New Funds, provided for in the Company’s JRP;

b)

Attend and vote yes in any general shareholders’ meeting of the Company held to approve or confirm any action or measure provided for in the JRP;

c)

Keep aligned with the Company and support the implementation of the Company’s JRP, as approved and ratified at all court levels;

d)

Authorize the use by the Company of any amount returned by Portugal’s Tax Authority beginning March 24, 2015 related to the cost of guarantees and tax contingencies for purposes of the provisions of Paragraph 1, “c” and “d”, above.

As at December 31, 2018 items a) and b) of the terms and conditions to be met by the Company were recognized in its liabilities, Provisions for civil contingencies, amounting to R$157,809, pursuant to ASC 855.

Completion of the JRP Stages

As Described in Note 1, on January 8, 2018, the Judicial Reorganization Court issued a decision that ratified the JRP and granted the judicial reorganization to the Oi Companies, which was published on February 5, 2018. On July 31, 2018, the restructuring of the financial debt, including the first capital increase provided for in the JRP (Capital Increase – Claim Capitalization) was completed with the implementation of the applicable terms and conditions, provided for in the JRP. On January 25, 2019 the Company completed the second capital increase provided for in the JRP (Capital Increase - New Funds), with the issue of 3,225,806,451 book-entry, registered common shares, without par value, including new common shares represented by ADSs, pursuant to the JRP and the subscription and commitment agreement entered into by the Company, its subsidiaries, and the Backstop Investors.

Capital increase

Exercise of subscription warrants and ADWs

On October 28, 2018, the Company commenced the issuance and delivery of all exercised warrants and ADWs to its holders. The process was concluded on January 4, 2019. All warrants that were not exercised on or prior to January 2, 2019 have been cancelled.
  USGAAP
December 31,
2018
  Impairment
of long-lived
assets

(a)
  

Business
combinations
prior to
January 1,
2009

(b)

 

Pension plans
and other post-
retirement
benefits

(c)

 

Capitalization
of interest,
net of
amortization
(d)

 

Provision for
onerous contracts

(e)

 

Settlement of
judicial
reorganization

(f)

 

Deferred
income tax

(g)

 

Reclassifications

 IFRS
December 31,
2018
 

Cash and cash equivalents

  4,385,329           4,385,329 

Short-term investments

  201,975           201,975 

Accounts receivable

  6,516,555           6,516,555 

Recoverable income taxes

  621,246           621,246 

Other taxes

  803,252           803,252 

Judicial Deposits

  1,715,934           1,715,934 

Inventories

  317,503           317,503 

Prepaid expenses

  743,953           743,953 

Pension plan assets

  4,880           4,880 

Held-for-sale assets

  4,923,187           4,923,187 

Other assets

  1,079,670           1,079,670 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total current assets

  21,313,484     —   —   —   —   —   —     21,313,484 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term investments

  36,987           36,987 

Other taxes

  715,976           715,976 

Deferred tax assets

  23,050           23,050 

Judicial Deposits

  7,018,786           7,018,786 

Investments

  117,840           117,840 

Property, plant and equipment, net

  28,468,798   (228,244 124,081  60,928      28,425,563 

Intangible assets

  8,025,442   (997,881 (79,115)        6,948,446 

Pension plan assets

  753,827    (689,574)       64,253 

Prepaid expenses

         522,550  522,550 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other assets

  773,411         (522,549)  250,862 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Totalnon-current assets

  45,934,117   (1,226,125 44,966 (689,574) 60,928 —   —   —   1  44,124,313 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets

  67,247,601   (1,226,125 44,966 (689,574) 60,928 —   —   —   1  65,437,797 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trade payables

  5,225,862         (201,602)  5,024,260 

Trade payables – Subject to the JRP

         201,602  201,602 

Borrowings and financing

  672,894           672,894 

Payroll, related taxes and benefits

  906,655           906,655 

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

 

Preferential offer and completion of the Capital Increase – New Funds, pursuant to the commitment agreement

As contemplated by Section 6 of the JRP, on November 13, 2018 the Company commenced a preemptive offering of common shares that was registered with the SEC under the Securities Act under which holders of common shares and preferred shares, including the ADS Depositary and The Bank of New York Mellon, as depositary of the Preferred ADS program, received transferable rights for each common share or preferred share held as of November 19, 2018.

The subscription rights expired on January 4, 2019. On January 16, 2019, the Company issued 1,530,457,356 common shares to holders of subscription rights that had exercised those subscription rights with respect to the initial common shares. On January 21, 2019, the Company issued 91,080,933 common shares to holders of subscription rights that had requested subscriptions for excess common shares. The proceeds of these subscriptions were R$2,011 million.

On January 25, 2019, the Company issued 1,604,268,162 common shares, representing the total number of common shares that were offered in the preemptive offering less the total number of initial common shares and excess common shares, to the Backstop Investors in a private placement under the terms of the commitment agreement for the aggregate amount of R$1,989 million. In addition, under the terms of the commitment agreement, on that date the Company issued 272,148,705 common shares in a private placement to the Backstop Investors and paid US$13 million to the Backstop Investors as compensation for their commitments under the commitment agreement.

Buyback of Oi preferred shares

At the meeting held in February 2019, the Board of Directors approved the buyback by Oi of up to 1,800,000 preferred shares in order to ensure the compliance with the obligation assumed by the Company to transfer own shares held in treasury to shareholder Bratel, wholly-owned subsidiary of Pharol, in the context of the agreement entered into by the two companies on January 8, 2019.

The acquisition was made by investing part of the balance available in the Company’s capital reserve, through transactions conducted on B3’sover-the-counter market in February 2019, with the intermediation of BTG Pactual Corretora de Títulos e Valores Mobiliários S.A.

Arbitration Decision – Unitel

On February 27, 2019, the Company was notified of the final decision issued by the Arbitration Court under the arbitration proceeding filed against the other Unitel’s shareholders. The Arbitration Court judged that the other Unitel shareholders had violated several provisions of Unitel’s Shareholders’ Agreement, among other matters. This Court sentenced them to pay PT Ventures approximately US$653 million, plus interest, as compensation for damages.
  USGAAP
December 31,
2018
  Impairment
of long-lived
assets

(a)
  

Business
combinations
prior to
January 1,
2009

(b)

 

Pension plans
and other post-
retirement
benefits

(c)

 

Capitalization
of interest,
net of
amortization
(d)

 

Provision for
onerous contracts

(e)

 

Settlement of
judicial
reorganization

(f)

 

Deferred
income tax

(g)

 

Reclassifications

 IFRS
December 31,
2018
 

Income taxes payable

  27,026           27,026 

Other taxes

  1,033,868           1,033,868 

Tax financing program

  142,036           142,036 

Dividends and interest on capital

  6,168           6,168 

Provision

  680,542           680,542 

Unearned revenues

  229,497         (229,497) 

Advances from customers

  73,094         (73,094) 

Licenses and concessions payable

  85,619           85,619 

Liabilities associated toheld-for-sale assets

  526,870           526,870 

Other payables

  629,939      449,389   302,591  1,381,919 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

  10,240,070   —    —   —   —   449,389 —   —     10,689,459 

Trade payables – Subject to the JRP

  3,593,008           3,593,008 

Borrowings and financing

  15,777,012           15,777,012 

Other taxes

  628,716           628,716 

Tax financing program

  411,170           411,170 

Provision

  4,358,178           4,358,178 

Provision for pension plans

  579,122           579,122 

Unearned revenues

  1,687,073         (1,687,073) 

Advances from customers

  142,134         (142,134) 

Other payables

  631,622   (13)   4,044,505   1,829,207  6,505,321 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Totalnon-current liabilities

  27,808,035   —    — 13 —   —   4,044,505 —   —     31,852,527 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total liabilities

  38,048,105   —    (13) —   —   4,493,894 —   —     42,541,986 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shareholders’ equity attributable to the Company and subsidiaries

  28,956,006   (1,226,125 44,979 (689,574) 60,928 (4,493,894) —   —     22,652,320 

Non-controlling interest

  243,490         1  243,491 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total shareholders’ equity

  29,199,496   (1,226,125 44,979 (689,574) 60,928 (4,493,894) —   —   1  22,895,811 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

  67,247,601   (1,226,125 44,966 (689,574) 60,928 —   —   —   1  65,437,797 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

Reconciliation of net income for the year ended December 31, 2018

 

New Unitel Board of Directors
  USGAAP
December 31,
2018
  Impairment
of long-lived
assets (a)
  Business
combinations
prior to
January 1,
2009 (b)
  Pension
plans and
other post-
retirement
benefits (c)
  Capitalization
of interest,
net of
amortization (d)
  Provision
for onerous
contracts (e)
  Settlement of
judicial
reorganization (f)
  Deferred
income tax
and other
adjustments (g)
  Reclassification  IFRS
December 31,
2018
 

Net operating revenue

  22,060,014           22,060,014 

Cost of sales and services

  (15,822,732  150,389   4,121   (45,457  (12,729  141,758     (594,450  (16,179,100

Gross profit

  6,237,282   150,389   4,121   (45,457  (12,729  141,758   —     —     (594,450  5,880,914 

Operating (expenses) income

          

Selling expenses

  (4,478,352    (28,655     372,977   281,028   (3,853,002

General and administrative expenses

  (2,697,865    (40,853       (2,738,718

Other operating income

          2,204,134   2,204,134 

Other operating expenses

  417,159   (291,807   (115   (4,883,620  (112,491   (1,890,712  6,761,586 

Reorganization items, net

  31,580,541        (31,580,541   

Loss before financial income (expenses) and taxes

  31,058,765   (141,418  4,121   (115,080  (12,729  (4,741,862  (31,693,032  372,977    (5,268,258

Financial income (expenses), net

  (4,012,067     10,949   247,968   30,362,016     26,608,866 

Profit (loss) before taxes

  27,046,698   (141,418  4,121   (115,080  (1,780  (4,493,894  (1,331,016  372,977    21,340,608 

Current income tax

          115,706   115,706 

Income tax expense (current and deferred)

  347,139         2,927,808   (115,706  3,159,241 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Profit (loss) for the year

  27,393,837   (141,418  4,121   (115,080  (1,780  (4,493,894  (1,331,016  3,300,785    24,615,555 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Profit (loss) attributable to owners of the Company

  27,369,422   (141,418  4,121   (115,080  (1,780  (4,493,894  (1,331,016  3,300,785    24,591,140 

Profit (loss) attributable tonon-controlling interests

  24,415           24,415 

At the General Shareholders’ Meeting of Unitel held on March 19, 2019 a new Board of Directors was elected consisting of five members, including two appointed by PT Ventures, one of whom will hold the position of Unitel’s General Director.

Capital Increase – Dutch Companies

Pursuant to the JRP approved on December 19 and 20, 2017, the debts of the JR Debtors of the group represented by the bonds were consolidated at Oi S.A.. In addition, as part of the payment of the bondholders’ claims, shares of the parent company (Oi S.A.) were delivered, consisting of new shares or existing shares held by PTIF. As a result, in order to correctly reflect these movements in accounting, it was necessary to enter into loan agreements on July 31, 2018, between Oi S.A. and Oi Coop, and between Oi S.A. and PTIF. These agreements provided for the possibility of paying and settling he total amount due through a capital increase, which was undertaken by Oi S.A. on January 31, 2019, amounting to €665,639,602.32 at Oi Coop and €1,100,259.843.00 at PTIF.

31.

CONDENSED COMBINED AND CONSOLIDATED DEBTORIN-POSSESSION FINANCIAL INFORMATION

The financial statements below represent the condensed combined financial statements of the Debtors. The nonfiling entities are accounted for as nonconsolidated subsidiaries in these financial statements and, as such, their net loss is included using the equity method of accounting. Intercompany balances among the Debtors amounting to R$45.0 billion in 2018 (R$50.1 billion in 2017) related mainly with loans granted and have been eliminated in the financial statements presented below. Intercompany balances among the Debtors and the nonfiling entities have not been eliminated.

   12/31/2018   12/31/2017 

Current assets

    

Cash and cash equivalents

   4,233,558    6,690,900 

Short-term investments

   201,975    14,605 

Trade accounts receivable

   7,224,720    6,590,543 

Inventories

   177,973    137,575 

Related parts

   431,276    949,851 

Recoverable taxes

   1,304,991    1,818,242 

Judicial Deposits

   1,700,428    1,000,519 

Pension plan assets

   4,824    1,072 

Dividends and interest on capital

   14,512    529,934 

Other assets

   1,845,235    1,546,295 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current assets

   17,139,492    19,279,536 

Non-current assets

    

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

Reconciliation of net income for the year ended December 31, 2017

 

Long-term investments

   36,987    114,839 

Pension plan assets

   23,050   

Other taxes

   714,653    626,057 

Judicial Deposits

   6,837,701    8,110,179 

Investments

   4,335,863    5,852,604 

Property, plant and equipment, net

   27,965,455    26,561,160 

Intangible assets

   7,978,956    9,185,107 

Pension plan assets

   753,827    1,598,792 

Other assets

   772,363    372,142 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total non-current assets

   49,418,855    52,420,878 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

   66,558,347    71,700,415 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Current liabilities

    

Trade payables

   6,108,115    6,697,217 

Loans and financing

   672,894    530,051 

Payroll, related taxes and benefits

   504,152    575,673 

Current income taxes payable

   925,590    1,334,859 

Tax financing program

   141,897    271,503 

Provision for Contingencies

   677,229   

Dividends and interest on capital

   6,168    6,222 

Licenses and concessions payable

   85,619    20,306 

Other payables

   956,770    1,146,780 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

   10,078,434    10,582,610 

Non-Current liabilities

    

Related parts

   227,764    1,116,169 

Loans and financing

   15,785,558   

Trade payables

   3,736,117   

Other taxes

   623,917    867,657 

Deferred taxes

     497,375 

Tax financing program

   410,500    599,047 

Provisions for Contingencies

   3,857,871    617,103 

Liability for pensions benefits

   579,122    10,433 

Licenses and concessions payable

     604 

Unearned revenues

   1,531,464    1,596,462 

Advances from customers

   9,097    9,964 

Other payables

   766,730    641,253 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total non-current liabilities

   27,528,140    5,956,067 
   USGAAP
December 31,
2017
  Impairment
of long-lived
assets (a)
   Business
combinations
prior to
January 1,
2009 (b)
   Pension
plans and
other post-
retirement
benefits (c)
  Capitalization
of interest,
net of
amortization (d)
  Provision
for onerous
contracts (e)
   Settlement of
judicial
reorganization (f)
  Deferred
income tax (g)
  Reclassification  IFRS
December 31,
2017
 

Net operating revenue

   23,789,654              23,789,654 

Cost of sales and services

   (15,676,216  779,368    4,313    (82,045  (11,670      (682,403  (15,668,653

Gross profit

   8,113,438   779,368    4,313    (82,045  (11,670            (682,403  8,121,001 

Operating (expenses) income

              

Selling expenses

   (4,399,936      (42,901       340,281   (4,102,556

General and administrative expenses

   (3,064,252      (72,556        (3,136,808

Other operating income

              1,985,101   1,985,101 

Other operating expenses

   (1,043,922  4,747,195      (198     (7,287,862   (1,642,979  (5,227,766

Reorganization items, net

   (2,371,918          2,371,918    

Loss before financial and taxes

   (2,766,590  5,526,563    4,313    (197,700  (11,670      (4,915,944      (2,361,028

Financial expenses, net

   (1,612,058       2,348     (1,586,802    (3,196,512

Profit (loss) before taxes

   (4,378,648  5,526,563    4,313    (197,700  (9,322      (6,502,746      (5,557,540

Current income tax

              (906,080  (906,080

Income tax expense (current and deferred)

   350,987            (1,449,609  906,080   (192,542
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Loss for the year

   (4,027,661  5,526,563    4,313    (197,700  (9,322      (6,502,746  (1,449,609   (6,656,162
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Loss attributable to owners of the Company

   (3,736,518  5,526,563    4,313    (197,700  (9,322  0    (6,502,746  (1,449,609   (6,365,019

Loss attributable tonon-controlling interests

   (291,143             (291,143

Oi S.A. - Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands of Brazilian reais - R$, unless otherwise stated)

 

Reconciliation of comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2018

 

Total liabilities not subject to compromise

   37,606,574    16,538,677 

Liabilities subject to compromise

     65,139,227 

Total liabilities

   37,606,574    81,677,904 

Shareholders’ equity (deficit)

    

Total share capital

   32,038,471    21,438,374 

Share issued costs

   (377,429   (377,429

Capital reserves

   11,532,995    13,242,374 

Treasury shares

   (2,803,250   (5,531,092

Other comprehensive income

   (207,886   (241,780

Accumulated losses

   (11,231,129   (38,507,937

Total shareholders’ equity (deficit)

   28,951,773    (9,977,489) 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

   66,558,347    71,700,415 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   USGAAP
December 31,
2018
  Impairment
of long-
lived assets

(a)
  Business
combinations
prior to
January 1,
2009

(b)
   Pension
plans and
other post-
retirement
benefits

(c)
  Capitalization
of interest,
net of
amortization

(d)
  Provision
for onerous
contracts

(e)
  Settlement of
judicial
reorganization

(f)
  Deferred
income tax
and other
adjustment

(g)
   IFRS
December 31,
2018
 

Profit (loss) for the year

   27,393,837   (141,418  4,121    (115,080  (1,780  (4,493,894  (1,331,016  3,300,785    24,615,555 

Other comprehensive income (loss)

            

Foreign currency translation adjustments

   (110,098           (110,098
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   (110,098)                  (110,098) 

Pension and other postretirement benefit plans:

            

Net actuarial loss from continuing operations

   (918,782     1,024,297        105,515 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Pension and other postretirement benefit plans

   (918,782         1,024,297                105,515 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 
                      

Income tax effect on other comprehensive income (loss):

            

Pension and other postretirement benefit plans

   312,386      (348,261       (35,875
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   312,386       (348,261)           (35,875) 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income (loss) for the year

   26,677,343   (141,418  4,121    560,956   (1,780  (4,493,894  (1,331,016  3,300,785    24,575,097 

Comprehensive loss attributable tonon-controlling interest

   (49,966           (49,966
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to controlling shareholders

   26,727,309   (141,418  4,121    560,956   (1,780  (4,493,894  (1,331,016  3,300,785    24,625,063 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Intercompany transactions among

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Debtors amounting toConsolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$3.06 billion in 2018 (R$5.64 billion in 2017) related mainly with interests and interconnection charges and have been eliminated in the financial statements presented below. Intercompany transactions among the Debtors and the nonfiling entities have not been eliminated., unless otherwise stated)

 

   12/31/2018   12/31/2017 

Net operating revenue

   21,036,018    20,429,388 

Cost of sales and services

   (10,998,010   (15,573,190
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Gross profit

   10,038,008    4,856,197 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating (expenses) income

    

Selling expenses

   (4,834,472   (4,077,876

General and administrative expenses

   (2,235,870   (2,438,107

Other operating income (expenses), net

   (4,529,992   118,609 

Equity pickup

   570,975    (138,999

Reorganization items, net

   31,580,541    (2,371,919

Income (loss) before financial and taxes 

   30,589,190    (4,052,094) 

Financial expenses, net

   (3,949,716   (566,679

Income (loss) beforeincometaxes

   26,639,474    (4,618,772) 

Income tax (current and deferred)

   562,205    884,602 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income(loss) for the year

   27,201,679    (3,734,170) 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

F-102Reconciliation of comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2017

   USGAAP
December 31,
2017
  Impairment
of long-
lived assets

(a)
   Business
combinations
prior to
January 1,
2009

(b)
   Pension
plans and
other
post-
retirement
benefits

(c)
  Capitalization
of interest,
net of
amortization

(d)
  Provision
for
onerous
contracts

(e)
   Settlement of
judicial
reorganization

(f)
  Deferred
income tax
and other
adjustments

(g)
  IFRS
December 31,
2017
 

Loss for the year

   (4,027,661  5,526,563    4,313    (197,700  (9,322  —      (6,502,746  (1,449,609  (6,656,162

Other comprehensive income (loss)

             

Foreign currency translation adjustments

   165,713            (1,943  163,770 

Decrease of interest shares in subsidiary

   (374,130           374,130    
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   (208,417)                 372,187  163,770 

Pension and other postretirement benefit plans:

             

Net actuarial loss from continuing operations

   (130,846      161,099        30,253 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Pension and other postretirement benefit plans

   (130,846          161,099                30,253 

Income tax effect on other comprehensive income (loss):

             

Pension and other postretirement benefit plans

   32,157       (42,528       (10,371
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   32,157        (42,528)           (10,371) 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total comprehensive (loss) for the year

   (4,334,767  5,526,563    4,313    (79,129  (9,322      (6,502,746  (1,077,422  (6,472,510

Comprehensive loss attributable tonon-controlling interest

   (64,153           (205,044  (269,197
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Comprehensive loss attributable to controlling shareholders

   (4,270,614  5,526,563    4,313    (79,129  (9,322  —      (6,502,746  (872,378  (6,203,313
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

Reconciliation of cash flow for the year ended December 31, 2018

   USGAAP
December 31,
2018
  Impairment
of long-
lived assets

(a)
  Business
combinations
prior to
January 1,
2009

(b)
  Pension
plans and
other
post-
retirement
benefits

(c)
  Capitalization
of interest,
net of
amortization

(d)
  Provision
for
onerous
contracts

(e)
  Settlement of
judicial
reorganization

(f)
  Deferred
income tax
and other
adjustments

(g)
  Reclassification  IFRS
December 31,
2018
 

Operating activities

           

Profit (loss) for the year

   27,393,837   (141,418  4,121   (115,080  (1,780  (4,493,894  (1,331,016  3,300,785    24,615,555 

Income tax expenses

   (347,139                    (2,927,808   (3,274,947

Profit (loss) before income taxes

   27,046,698   (141,418  4,121   (115,080  (1,780  (4,493,894  (1,331,016  372,977    21,340,608 

Income tax reclassification

   347,139         (347,139    

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash provided by operating activities

           

Loss (gain) on financial instruments

   3,415,354      (10,949  (389,726  (5,080,135   22,099   (2,043,357

Gains of restructuring of third-party borrowings

           (11,054,800    (11,054,800

Fair value adjustment to borrowings and financing

           (13,928,659    (13,928,659

Present value adjustment to other liabilities

           (1,167,043    (1,167,043

Depreciation and amortization

   5,952,905   (150,389  (4,121   12,729      (1  5,811,123 

Onerous obligation

        4,883,620      4,883,620 

Impairment ofheld-for-sale securities

   (292,799         292,799  

Estimated loss on doubtful debts

   1,224,248         (372,977   851,271 

Provisions (reversals)

   (19,465       112,491     93,026 

Provision for pension plans

   (114,813    115,080        267 

Impairment losses

   —     291,807         (49  291,758 

Deferred tax expense (benefit)

   (231,433        231,433     

Reorganization items, net

   (31,580,541       31,580,541      

Equity in investees

           13,492   13,492 

Loss on disposal of capital assets

           215,398   215,398 

Concession Agreement Extension Fee—ANATEL

           68,333   68,333 

Employee and management profit sharing

           237,253   237,253 

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

   USGAAP
December 31,
2018
  Impairment
of long-
lived assets

(a)
   Business
combinations
prior to
January 1,
2009

(b)
   Pension
plans and
other
post-
retirement
benefits

(c)
   Capitalization
of interest,
net of
amortization

(d)
   Provision
for
onerous
contracts

(e)
   Settlement of
judicial
reorganization

(f)
   Deferred
income tax
and other
adjustments

(g)
   Reclassification  IFRS
December 31,
2018
 

Monetary correction to provisions/(reversals)

                  226,870   226,870 

Monetary correction to tax refinancing program

                  28,079   28,079 

Other

                  (637,518  (637,518

Changes in assets and liabilities

                  

Accounts receivable

   (365,771                 (365,771

Inventories

                  (48,280  (48,280

Taxes

   121,951                  121,951 

Held-for-trading financial assets

   (1,191,664                 (1,191,664

Redemption of held-for-trading financial assets

   1,103,920                  1,103,920 

Trade payables

   (860,900                 (860,900

Payroll, related taxes and benefits

   (253,902                 (253,902

Provisions

   (434,974                 (434,974

Net increase in income taxes refundable and payable

   (799,189              115,706    683,483  

Employee and management profit sharing

   237,253                 (237,253 

Changes in assets and liabilities held for sale

   (257,643                 (257,643

Other assets and liabilities

   (183,838            868,621      (159,123  525,660 

Financial charges paid - debt

                  (19,215  (19,215

Financial charges paid - other

                  (2,884  (2,884

Income tax and social contribution paid—Company

                  (495,038  (495,038

Income tax and social contribution paid—third parties

                  (188,445  (188,445
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

   2,862,536                                  2,862,536 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

   USGAAP
December 31,
2018
  Impairment
of long-
lived assets

(a)
   Business
combinations
prior to
January 1,
2009

(b)
   Pension
plans and
other
post-
retirement
benefits

(c)
   Capitalization
of interest,
net of
amortization

(d)
   Provision
for
onerous
contracts

(e)
   Settlement of
judicial
reorganization

(f)
   Deferred
income tax
and other
adjustments

(g)
   Reclassification   IFRS
December 31,
2018
 

Investing activities

                   

Capital expenditures

   (5,246,241                  (5,246,241

Proceeds from the sale of investments, tangibles and intangibles

   22,276                   22,276 

Judicial deposits

   (775,953                  (775,953

Redemption of judicial deposits

   1,083,043                   1,083,043 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash used in by in investing activities

   (4,916,875                                  (4,916,875
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Financing activities

                   

Repayment of principal of borrowings, financing and derivatives

   (161,884                  (161,884

Payments of obligation for licenses and concessions

   (1,491                  (1,491

Payments of obligation for tax refinancing program

   (265,495                  (265,495

Payment of dividends and interest on capital

   (54                  (54

Exercise of warrants

   4,580                   4,580 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash used in financing activities

   (424,344                                  (424,344
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Foreign exchange differences on cash and cash equivalents

   1,328                   1,328 

Cash flows for the year

   (2,477,355                                  (2,477,355

Cash and cash equivalents beginning of year

   6,862,684                   6,862,684 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents end of year

   4,385,329                                   4,385,329 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

Reconciliation of cash flow for the year ended December 31, 2017

   USGAAP
December 31,
2017
  Impairment
of long-
lived assets

(a)
  Business
combinations
prior to
January 1,
2009

(b)
  Pension
plans and
other
post-
retirement
benefits

(c)
  Capitalization
of interest,
net of
amortization

(d)
  Provision
for
onerous
contracts

(e)
   Settlement of
judicial
reorganization

(f)
  Deferred
income tax
and other
adjustments

(g)
  Reclassification  IFRS
December 31,
2017
 

Operating activities

            

Loss for the year

   (4,027,661  5,526,563   4,313   (197,700  (9,322      (6,502,746  (1,449,609   (6,656,162

Income tax

   (350,987                     1,449,609    1,098,622 

Loss before income taxes

   (4,378,648  5,526,563   4,313   (197,700  (9,322      (6,502,746      (5,557,540

Income tax reclassification

   350,987          (350,987    

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash provided by operating activities

            

Loss (gain) on financial instruments

   (1,115,823     (2,348    6,234,447    3,927   5,120,203 

Present value adjustment to other liabilities

          (4,873,000    (4,873,000

Depreciation and amortization

   5,881,302   (779,368  (4,313   11,670       1   5,109,292 

Impairment (reversal) ofheld-for-sale securities

   267,008           (267,008   

Estimated loss on doubtful debts

   784,403            784,403 

Provisions

   143,517         7,218,787     7,362,304 

Provision for pension plans

   (197,141    197,700         559 

Impairment losses (reversal)

   46,534   (4,747,195         (46,480  (4,747,141

Deferred tax expense (benefit)

   (1,257,068         1,257,068     

Reorganization items, net

   2,371,918         (2,371,918   

Equity in investees

            433   433 

Loss on disposal of capital assets

            211,735   211,735 

Concession Agreement Extension Fee—ANATEL

            88,658   88,658 

Employee and management profit sharing

            298,789   298,789 

Monetary correction to provisions/(reversals)

            674,668   674,668 

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

   USGAAP
December 31,
2017
  Impairment
of long-
lived assets

(a)
   Business
combinations
prior to
January 1,
2009

(b)
   Pension
plans and
other
post-
retirement
benefits

(c)
   Capitalization
of interest,
net of
amortization

(d)
   Provision
for
onerous
contracts

(e)
   Settlement of
judicial
reorganization

(f)
  Deferred
income tax
and other
adjustments

(g)
  Reclassification  IFRS
December 31,
2017
 

Monetary correction to tax refinancing program

                27,294   27,294 

Other

                449,722   449,722 

Changes assets and liabilities

                

Accounts receivable

   (253,469               (253,469

Inventories

                173,283   173,283 

Taxes

   477,164                477,164 

Held-for-trading financial assets

   (601,200               (601,200

Redemption of held-for-trading financial assets

   775,456                775,456 

Trade payables

   (374,003               (374,003

Payroll, related taxes and benefits

   (42,727               (42,727

Provision for contingencies

   (114,336            (312,313    (426,649

Net increase in income taxes refundable and payable

   399,182              (906,081  506,899    

Provision for pension plans

   54               (54   

Employee and management profit sharing

   298,789               (298,789   

Changes in assets and liabilities held for sale

   701,416                701,416 

Other

   238,443             606,743    (1,312,253  (467,067

Financial charges paid - debt

                (1,412  (1,412

Financial charges paid - other

                (2,515  (2,515

Income tax and social contribution paid—Company

                (314,162  (314,162

Income tax and social contribution paid—third parties

                (192,736  (192,736

Net cash provided by operating activities

   4,401,758                                4,401,758 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Oi S.A.Under Judicial ReorganizationDebtor-in-Possession and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands of Brazilian reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)

   USGAAP
December 31,
2017
  Impairment
of long-
lived assets

(a)
   Business
combinations
prior to
January 1,
2009

(b)
   Pension
plans and
other
post-
retirement
benefits

(c)
   Capitalization
of interest,
net of
amortization

(d)
   Provision
for
onerous
contracts

(e)
   Settlement of
judicial
reorganization

(f)
   Deferred
income tax
and other
adjustments

(g)
   Reclassification  IFRS
December 31,
2017
 
                                     

Investing activities

                  

Capital expenditures

   (4,344,238                 (4,344,238

Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment

   5,016                  5,016 

Judicial deposits

   (425,563                 (425,563

Redemption of judicial deposits

   343,129                  343,129 

Other

                  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash used in by in investing activities

   (4,421,656                                 (4,421,656
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Financing activities

                  

Repayment of principal of borrowings, financing

   (659                 (659

Payments of obligation for licenses and concessions

   (104,449                 (104,449

Payments of obligation for tax refinancing program

   (226,776                 (226,776

Share buyback

   (300,429                 (300,429

Payment of dividends and interest on capital

   (59,462                 (59,462
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash used in financing activities

   (691,775                                 (691,775
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Foreign exchange differences on cash and cash equivalents

   11,106                 (1  11,105 

Cash flows for the year

   (700,567                              (1  (700,568

Cash and cash equivalents beginning of year

   7,563,251                 1   7,563,252 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents end of year

   6,862,684                                  6,862,684 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

* * *

F-111