† The term “new or revised financial accounting standard” refers to any update issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board to its Accounting Standards Codification after April 5, 2012.

Our shares may not continue to be listed on the NYSE American LLC (“NYSE American”)

Failure to meet the applicable maintenance requirements of the NYSE American could result in our shares being delisted from the NYSE American. If we are delisted from the NYSE American, our shares may be eligible for trading on an over-the-counter market in the United States. In the event that we are not able to obtain a listing on another U.S. stock exchange or quotation service for our shares, it may be extremely difficult or impossible for shareholders to sell their shares in the United States. Moreover, if we are delisted from the NYSE American, but obtain a substitute listing for our shares in the United States, it will likely be on a market with less liquidity, and therefore potentially more price volatility, than the NYSE American. Shareholders may not be able to sell their shares on any such substitute U.S. market in the quantities, at the times, or at the prices that could potentially be available on a more liquid trading market. As a result of these factors, if our shares are delisted from the NYSE American, the price of our shares is likely to decline. In addition, a decline in the price of our shares will impair our ability to obtain financing in the future.

Future sales of our shares into the public market by holders of our options may lower the market price, which may result in losses to our shareholders.

As of March 30, 2020, we had 11,515,860 shares issued and outstanding. In addition, as of March 30, 2020, 38,000 shares were issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock options, all of which may be exercised in the future resulting in dilution to our shareholders. As of March 30, 2020 we may issue stock options to purchase an additional 1,113,586 shares under our existing stock option plan. As of March 30, 2020, our senior officers and directors beneficially owned, as a group, 477,665 shares (4.15% of our issued share capital), including stock options to acquire an additional 18,000 shares. Sales of substantial amounts of our shares into the public market, by our officers or directors or pursuant to the exercise of options, or even the perception by the market that such sales may occur, may lower the market price of our shares.

~~In 2009, the government of Zimbabwe made foreign currencies legal tender~~

The current economic situation in Zimbabwe can be summarized as follows:

There continues to be a shortage of foreign currency in Zimbabwe, although in recent months Blanket has had satisfactory access to foreign exchange due to the higher gold price and ~~abolished the~~increased production.

The rate of annual inflation increased from 5% in September 2018 to approximately 500% by December 2019. The Zimbabwe ~~dollar. However, there~~Government no longer releases annualised inflation data, but it is ~~no guarantee~~widely accepted that the rate of inflation although still high has moderated to approximately 80% per annum in early 2020. A high rate of inflation has little effect on Blanket’s operations now that Blanket has adjusted employee remuneration to reflect the increased cost of living and Blanket’s costs and revenue track US Dollar prices.

Since October 2018, bank accounts in Zimbabwe ~~government will not reintroduce the~~have been bifurcated between Foreign Currency Accounts (“FCA”), which can be used to make international payments, and local ~~currency. The approval of~~currency (known as “RTGS” or “RTGS$”) accounts which can only be used for domestic transactions.

On February 20, 2019 the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe (“RBZ”) allowed inter-bank trading between currency held in the RTGS$ system and the FCA system. Prior to this, the RBZ had stipulated that a Dollar in the RTGS system was worth 1 US Dollar in the FCA system. The interbank exchange rate at each quarter-end since the introduction of the interbank rate in February 2019 is ~~required for all flows~~set out below.

Interbank Exchange Rates (RTGS$: US$1)
February 20, 2019	2.500
March 31, 2019	3.003
June 30, 2019	6.543
September 30, 2019	15.090
December 31, 2019	16.773

The interbank trading mechanism addressed the most pressing difficulty that emerged after the October 2018 policy implementation, being the erosion of ~~money into and out~~the purchasing power of ~~Zimbabwe. Caledonia and its subsidiaries have not encountered difficulty in obtaining the necessary approval from the RBZ. Zimbabwe is experiencing a shortage of currency inflows,~~Blanket’s employees due to rapidly increasing retail prices, which ~~means that foreign payments from Zimbabwe may encounter delays in execution.~~

~~If one of more of these risks occur, it could have a material and~~had an adverse effect on ~~our business, results of operations or financial performance.~~

~~Furthermore, the royalty rate in Zimbabwe is subject to change. Effective January 1, 2012, Zimbabwe~~employee morale. Management has increased ~~the gross royalty payable~~RTGS$-denominated remuneration so that it remains more closely aligned to the ~~Zimbabwe government from 4.5% to 7%~~US Dollar value using the interbank rate. This has alleviated some of the ~~gross revenues received~~financial distress experienced by ~~mining companies operating~~Blanket employees. The interbank market is relevant in ~~Zimbabwe from gold sales. Effective January 1, 2014,~~terms of creating an exchange rate; however, there ~~was a change~~is little liquidity in the ~~regulations which means that~~interbank market, so it is not a meaningful mechanism to trade between RTGS$ and US Dollars. In February 2020 the ~~royalty payable~~RBZ announced its intention to further liberalise the ~~Zimbabwe government was no longer allowable as a deduction for~~interbank market with the ~~purposes~~objective of ~~calculating income tax. With effect from October 1, 2014 the royalty rate was reduced to 5%. Changes to Zimbabwean legislation in January 2014 required all~~ increasing liquidity and transparency.

Zimbabwean gold producers, including Blanket, are required to sell their ~~production~~gold to ~~Fidelity for a sale value which represents 98.75%~~Fidelity. 55% of the ~~value~~sale proceeds are received in FCA and the balance is received in RTGS$. Blanket uses the FCA component to pay for imported goods, services and electricity; the RTGS$ component is used to pay for goods and services procured in Zimbabwe and to pay employees and taxes. At prevailing gold prices and the current rate of the gold contained. Prior to this change, Blanket Mine sold its gold to a non-Zimbabwean refiner and received 100% of the value of the gold contained. With effect from February 3, 2015, Blanket receives 98.75% of the value of the gold it delivers to Fidelity. In an attempt to stimulate increased gold production the ~~Government of Zimbabwe reduced~~55% FCA allocation is enough for Blanket to continue normal mining operations, to fully implement the ~~royalty rate applicable~~investment plan as scheduled and allow Caledonia to ~~large scale gold producers in Zimbabwe~~remit dividends from 5% to 3% for sales in 2016 that exceed the sales made in 2015. In 2016 Blanket sold 7,326 more ounces than it sold in 2015, which resulted in a reduction in the royalty charge of approximately $181,000.Zimbabwe.

•

On June 24, 2019 the Government issued S.I. 142 which stated: “Zimbabwe dollar (RTGS$) to be the sole currency for legal tender purposes for any transactions in Zimbabwe”. Throughout these announcements and to the date of the issue of the Consolidated Financial Statements the US Dollar has remained the primary currency in which the Group’s Zimbabwean entities operate and the functional currency of these entities. Previously there was uncertainty as to what currency would be used to settle amounts owed to the Zimbabwe Government. The announcement of S.I.142 clarified the Zimbabwean Government’s intentions that these liabilities were always denominated in RTGS$ and that RTGS$ would be the currency in which they would be settled. The devaluation of the deferred tax, electricity and term loan liabilities were the largest contributions to the net gain of $27.1 million which was recognised in 2019. Refer to note 17 and 12 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for the tax and foreign exchange effects of the pronouncements.

Investors should recognize that Blanket’s ability to implement its investment plan and Caledonia’s ability to sustain its operations outside Zimbabwe and pay future dividends depends, inter alia, on the ability to continue to externalize cash from Zimbabwe.

Our operations are subject to various government approvals, permits, licenses and legal regulation for which no assurance can be provided that if such approvals, permits or licenses will be obtained or if obtained will not be revoked or ~~suspended or any continued compliance with applicable laws or regulations thereunder.~~

suspended.

Government approvals, permits and licenses are required in connection with a number of our activities and additional approvals, permits and licenses may be required in the future. The duration and success of our efforts to obtain approvals, permits and licenses are contingent upon many variables outside of our control. Obtaining governmental approvals, permits and licenses can increase costs and cause delays depending on the nature of the activity and the interpretation of applicable requirements implemented by the relevant authority. While we and our affiliates currently hold the necessary licenses to conduct operations there can be no assurance that all necessary approvals, permits and licenses will be maintained or obtained or that the costs involved will not exceed our estimates or that we will be able to maintain such permits or licenses. To the extent such approvals, permits and licenses are not obtained or maintained, we may be prohibited from proceeding with planned drilling, exploration, development or operation of properties which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial performance.

In addition, failure to comply with applicable laws, regulations and requirements in the countries in which we operate may result in enforcement action, including orders calling for the curtailment or termination of operations on our property, or calling for corrective or remedial measures requiring considerable capital investment. Although we believe that our activities are currently carried out in all material respects in accordance with applicable rules and regulations, no assurance can be given that new rules and regulations will not be enacted or that existing rules and regulations will not be applied in a manner that could limit or curtail production or development of our properties or otherwise have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial performance.

We face risks related to mining, exploration and mine construction ~~if warranted,~~ on potential properties.

Our level of profitability, if any, in future years will depend on whether the Blanket Mine produces at forecasted rates and whether any exploration stage properties can be brought into production. The mining, exploration and development of mineral deposits involves significant risks. It is impossible to ensure that any current and future exploration programs will establish reserves. Whether a mineral ore body will be commercially viable depends on ~~a number of~~several factors, and the exact effect of these factors cannot be accurately ~~predicted, but the combination of these factors may result in us receiving an adequate return on invested capital.~~predicted. The exploration, development and production activities are subject to political, economic and other risks, including:

-cancellation or renegotiation of contracts;

-changes in local and foreign laws and regulations;

-changes in tax laws;

-	~~delays or refusal in granting prospecting permissions, mining authorizations and work permits for foreign management staff;~~

- delays or refusal in granting prospecting permissions, mining authorizations and work permits for foreign management staff;

- environmental controls and permitting;

-expropriation or nationalization of property or assets;

-foreign exchange ~~controls;~~

controls and the availability of foreign exchange;

- government mandated social expenditures;

-	~~import and export regulation, including restrictions on the sale of production in foreign currencies;~~

- import and export regulation, including restrictions on the sale of production in foreign currencies;

- industrial relations and the associated stability thereof;

-inflation of ~~cost~~costs that is not compensated for by a currency devaluation;

-	~~requirement that a foreign subsidiary or operating unit have a domestic joint venture partner, which, possibly, the foreign company must subsidize;~~

-	restrictions on the ability of local operating companies to sell their production for foreign currencies, and on the ability of such companies to hold these foreign currencies in offshore and/or local bank accounts;

-	~~restrictions on the ability of a foreign company to have management control of exploration and/or development and/or mining operations;~~

- requirement that a foreign subsidiary or operating unit has a domestic joint venture partner, which, possibly, the foreign company must subsidize;

- restrictions on the ability of local operating companies to hold foreign currencies in offshore and/or local bank accounts;

- restrictions on the ability of a foreign company to have management control of exploration and/or development and/or mining operations;

- restrictions on the remittance of dividend and interest payments offshore;

-retroactive tax or royalty claims;

-risks of loss due to civil strife, acts of war, guerrilla activities, insurrection and terrorism;

-royalties and tax increases or claims by governmental entities;

-unreliable local infrastructure and services such as power, water, communications and transport links;

-demands or actions by native or indigenous groups;

-	~~other risks arising out of foreign sovereignty over the areas in which operations are conducted; and~~

-	~~lack of investment funding;~~

- other risks arising out of foreign sovereignty over the areas in which operations are conducted; and

- lack of investment funding.

Such risks could potentially arise in any country in which we operate.

As a result of the foregoing, our exploration, development and production activities in Zimbabwe may be substantially affected by factors beyond our control, any of which could materially adversely affect our financial position or results from operations. Furthermore, in the event of a dispute arising from such activities, we may be subject to exclusive jurisdiction of courts outside North America or may not be successful in subjecting persons to the jurisdiction of the courts in North America, which could adversely affect the outcome of a dispute.

We will need to identify new ~~resources~~reserves to replace ~~ore which has~~mineral reserves that have been depleted by mining activities and to commence new projects. No assurance can be given that exploration activities by us will be successful in identifying sufficient mineral ~~resources~~reserves of an adequate grade and suitable metallurgical characteristics suitable for further development or production.

Blanket Mine is our principal mining asset. In addition, Blanket Mine has title to numerous but smaller satellite properties in the surrounding Gwanda greenstone terrain. These satellite properties are in the exploration stage and are without any known bodies of commercial ore. Further development of the properties will only proceed upon obtaining satisfactory exploration results. There is no assurance that our mineral exploration activities will result in any discoveries of commercial bodies of mineral reserves. The long-term profitability of our operations will, in part, be directly related to the costs and success of our exploration programs, which may be affected by ~~a number of~~several factors.

There can be no assurance, even when an economic deposit of minerals is located, that any of our property interests can be commercially mined. The exploration and development of mineral deposits involve a high degree of financial risk over a significant period ~~of time~~ which a combination of careful evaluation, experience and knowledge of management may not eliminate. While the discovery of additional ore-bearing structures may result in substantial rewards, few properties which are explored are ultimately developed into producing mines. Major expenses may be required to establish reserves by drilling and to construct mining and processing facilities at a particular site. It is impossible to ensure that our current exploration programs will result in profitable commercial mining operations. The profitability of our operations will be, in part, directly related to the cost and success of its exploration and development programs which may be affected by ~~a number of~~several factors. Additional expenditures are required to establish reserves ~~which~~that are sufficient to commercially mine and to construct, complete and install mining and processing facilities in those properties that are actually mined and developed.

Further development and commercial production at Blanket Mine and the other surrounding properties cannot be assured.

We are engaged in further development activities at Blanket Mine and its surrounding properties. Estimates for future production, at Blanket Mine, are based on mining plans and are subject to change. Production estimates are subject to risk and no assurance can be given that future production estimates will be achieved. Actual production may vary from estimated production for a variety of reasons including un-anticipated variations in grades, mined tonnages and geological conditions, accident and equipment breakdown, changes in metal prices and the cost and supply of inputs and changes to government regulations. Construction and development of projects are subject to numerous risks including, but not limited to: obtaining equipment, permits and services; changes in regulations; currency rate changes; labor shortages; fluctuations in metal prices; and the loss of community support.

Substantial expenditures are required to establish reserves through drilling, to develop metallurgical processes to extract gold from ore and to develop the mining, processing facilities and infrastructure at any site chosen for mining. Although substantial benefits may be derived from the discovery of a major mineralized deposit, no assurance can be given that minerals will be capable of economic extraction by metallurgical process, or discovered in sufficient quantities or grades, or the estimated operating costs of the mining venture are sufficient, to justify development of the deposit, or that the funds required for development can be obtained on a timely and economically acceptable basis.

The marketability of any minerals acquired or discovered may be affected by numerous factors which are beyond our control and which cannot be predicted, such as metal price and market fluctuations, the proximity and capacity of milling facilities, mineral markets and processing equipment, and such other factors as government regulations, including regulations relating to royalties, allowable production, importing and exporting of minerals, and environmental protection. Depending on the price of minerals produced, the Company may determine that it is not commercially feasible to commence or continue commercial production.

We face credit risk exposure from counterparties to certain contractual obligations and there is no assurance that any such counterparty may not default in such obligation causing us to incur a financial loss.

Credit risk is the risk that a party with a contractual obligation with us will default causing a loss. New regulations introduced by the Zimbabwean Ministry of Finance in January 2014 require that all gold produced in Zimbabwe must be sold to Fidelity, a company which is controlled by the Zimbabwean authorities. Accordingly, all of our production from Blanket Mine is sold to Fidelity. ToAt the date of approval of this document, Blanket has received all payments due from Fidelity in full and on time. This arrangement introduces a credit risk, beyond our control, that receivables and contractual performance due from Fidelity will not be paid or performed in a timely manner, or at all. If Fidelity or the Zimbabwean government were unable or unwilling to conduct business with us, or satisfy obligations to us, we could experience a material adverse effect upon our operations and financial performance.

From May 2016 the RBZ announced a 2.5% export incentive for large scale gold producers. In terms of the directive the Blanket Mine will receive an additional 2.5% on all proceeds of gold sales to Fidelity. As at March 30, 2017 all export incentive payments outstanding as at December 31, 2016 were received in USD. ~~In January 2017, Blanket Mine was awarded an additional export incentive credit of 1% of sale proceeds, thus the total export incentive in 2017 is expected to be 3.5% of revenues.~~

The mining industry is highly competitive and there is no guarantee we will always be able to compete effectively.

The mining industry is a highly diverse and competitive international business. The selection of geographic areas of interest are only limited by the degree of risk a company is willing to accept by the acquisition of properties in emerging or developed markets and/or prospecting in explored or virgin territory. Mining, by its nature, is a competitive business with the search for fresh ground with good exploration potential and the raising of the requisite capital to move projects forward to production. There is aggressive competition within the mining industry for the discovery and acquisition of properties considered to have commercial potential. We will compete with other interests, many of which have greater financial resources than we will have, for the opportunity to participate in promising projects. Such competition may have better access to potential resources, more developed infrastructure, more available capital, have better access to necessary financing, and more knowledgeable and available employees than us. We may encounter competition in acquiring mineral properties, hiring mining professionals, obtaining mining resources, such as manpower, drill rigs, and other mining equipment. Such competitors could outbid us for potential projects or produce gold at lower costs. Increased competition could also affect our ability to attract necessary capital funding or acquire suitable properties or prospects for gold exploration or production in the future. Significant capital investment is required to achieve commercial production from successful exploration and development efforts. Globally, the mining industry is prone to cyclical variations in the price of the commodities produced by it, as dictated by supply and demand factors, speculative factors and industry-controlled marketing cartels. Nature provides the ultimate uncertainty with geological and occasionally climatic surprises. Commensurate with the acceptance of this risk profile is the potential for high rewards. If we are unable to successfully compete for properties, capital, customers or employees it could have a materially adverse effect on our results of operations.

We ~~are~~were required to facilitate the economic participation of certain indigenous groups in our business and there can be no assurance that such required participation ~~will be~~was at fair market ~~value.~~

value or that the terms of the agreements can be amended.

The government of Zimbabwe ~~has~~ introduced legislation ~~(typically referred to as indigenisation)~~in 2012 requiring companies to facilitate participation in their shareholdings and business enterprises by the indigenous ~~population.~~population (typically referred to as indigenization). It is not assured that such interests ~~will be~~were paid for at full fair ~~value, which may result in increased political and economic risks of operating in that area.~~value. As reported, Blanket Mine ~~has~~ complied with the requirements of the ~~Indigenisation~~Indigenization and Economic Empowerment Act in Zimbabwe whereby indigenous shareholders legally ~~own~~owned 51% ~~ownership~~ of Blanket Mine since September ~~2012. Refer to note 5~~2012 (until recently – see below).

Pronouncements from the Zimbabwe Government following the appointment of the ~~Consolidated Financial Statements~~new President in late 2017 announced a relaxation in the indigenization policy which, amongst other things, included the removal of an indigenization requirement for ~~additional information~~gold mining companies. These pronouncements were passed into law in March 2018.

On November 6, 2018, the Company announced that it had entered into a sale agreement with Fremiro Investments (Private) Limited (“Fremiro”) to purchase Femiro’s 15% shareholding in Blanket for a gross consideration of $16.7 million to be settled through a combination of the cancellation of the loan between the two entities which stood at $11.5 million as at June 30, 2018 and the issue of 727,266 new shares in Caledonia at an issue price of $7.15 per share. On completion of the transaction on January 20, 2020, Caledonia owned 64% in Blanket and Fremiro held approximately 6.3% of Caledonia’s shares.

Further, Caledonia has indicated to the ~~indigenisation transaction.~~

Government of Zimbabwe a desire to engage in discussions to purchase the shareholding in Blanket that is currently held by the National Indigenization and Economic Empowerment Fund (“NIEEF”). There is no certainty that agreement will be reached on a transaction in respect of NIEEF’s shareholding.

We currently do not depend on our ability to successfully access the capital and financial markets. However, should our financial position change any inability to access the capital or financial markets may limit our ability to execute our business plan or pursue investments that we may rely on for future growth.

We expect that, for at least fiscal years 2017 through to 2021, we can fund all of our current exploration, development and production operations from cash on hand, overdraft and debt facilities and cash generated from operating activities.

Depending on our ability to generate income from our operations, we may require further financing for current and future exploration and development. Should our projections for fiscal years ~~2017~~2020 through to ~~2021~~2022 prove incorrect, ~~in order~~ to finance our working capital needs, we may have to raise funds through the issuance of additional equity or debt securities. Depending on the type and the terms of any financing we pursue, shareholders’ rights and the value of their investment in our shares could be reduced. Any additional equity financing will dilute shareholdings, and new or additional debt financing, if available, may involve restrictions on financing and operating activities. In addition, if we issue secured debt securities, the holders of the debt would have a claim to our assets that would be prior to the rights of shareholders until the debt is paid. Interest on these debt securities would increase costs and negatively impact operating results.

If we are unable to obtain additional financing, as needed, at competitive rates, our ability to implement our business plan and strategy may be affected, and we may be required to reduce the scope of our operations and scale back our exploration and development programs as the case may be. There is, however, no guarantee that we will be able to secure any additional funding or be able to secure funding which will provide us with sufficient funds to meet our objectives, which may adversely affect our business and financial position.

Our share price has been and is likely to continue to be volatile and an investment in our shares could suffer a decline in value.

Market prices for mining company securities, by their nature, are volatile. Factors, such as rapidly changing commodity prices, political unrest globally and in countries where we operate, speculative interest in mining stocks etc. are but a few factors affecting the volatility of the share price. Our shares are listed in the U.S. on the NYSE American, in Canada on the Toronto Stock Exchange (“TSX”) and ~~depository~~depositary interests representing our shares are admitted to trading on ~~AIM. Our shares are also quoted in~~AIM of the ~~U.S. on the OTCQX. (The~~London Stock Exchange (“AIM”) (the use of the term “share” in this Annual Report also, where the context requires, extends to a depositary interest representing a ~~share.)~~share).

You should consider an investment in our shares as risky and invest only if you can withstand a significant loss and wide fluctuations in the market value of your investment. The market price of our shares may be highly volatile and subject to wide fluctuations. In addition, the trading volume of our shares may fluctuate and cause significant price variations to occur. If the market price of our shares declines significantly, you may be unable to resell your shares at or above the purchase price, if at all. We cannot assure you that the market price of our shares will not fluctuate or significantly decline in the future. Factors affecting our share price include but are not limited to:

·	• actual or expected fluctuations in our operating results;

·	• actual or expected changes in our growth rates or our competitors’ growth rates;

·	• changes in the market price of gold;

·	• changes in the demand for gold;

·	• high extraction costs;

·	~~accidents;~~• accidents

·	• changes in market valuations of similar companies;

·	• additions to or departures of our key personnel;

·	• actual or anticipated fluctuations in our quarterly operating results or those of our competitors;

·	• publication of research reports by securities analysts about us or our competitors in the industry;

·	• our failure or the failure of our competitors to meet analysts’ projections or guidance that we or our competitors may give to the market;

·	• fluctuations of exchange rates between the USD, GBP, CAD and ~~the South African rand;~~ZAR;

·	• changes or proposed changes in laws and regulations affecting the gold mining industry;

·	• changes in trading volume of our shares on the NYSE American, TSX ~~AIM~~ or ~~the OTCQX;~~AIM;

·	• sales or perceived potential sales of our shares by us, our directors, senior management or our shareholders in the future;

·	• short selling or other market manipulation activities;

·	• announcement or expectation of additional financing efforts;

·	• terrorist acts, acts of war or periods of widespread civil unrest;

·	• natural disasters and other calamities;

·	• litigation involving us, including: shareholder litigation, investigations or audits by regulators into our operations; or proceedings initiated by our competitors or clients;

·	• strategic decisions by us or our competitors, such as acquisitions, divestitures, spin-offs, joint ventures, strategic investments or changes in business strategy;

·	• the passage of legislation or other regulatory developments affecting us or our industry;

·	• fluctuations in the valuation of companies perceived by investors to be comparable to us; and

·	• conditions in the U.S., Canadian and United Kingdom financial markets or changes in general economic conditions.

We are dependent on key management employees.

Our success depends (i) on the continued contributions of our directors, executive officers, management and ~~consultants,~~ consultants; and (ii) on our ability to attract new personnel whenever we seek to implement our business strategy. The loss of the services of any of these persons could have a materially adverse effect on our business, prospects results of operations and financial performance. The limited availability of mining and other technical skills and experience in Zimbabwe and the difficulty of attracting appropriately skilled employees to Zimbabwe creates a risk that appropriate skills may not be available if, for whatever reason, the current skills base at the Blanket Mine is depleted. There is no assurance that we will always be able to locate and hire all of the personnel that we may require. Where appropriate, we engage with consulting and service companies to undertake some of the work functions.

Our mineral rights may be subject to defects in title.

We are not currently aware of any significant competing ownership claims or encumbrances respecting title to our properties. However, the ownership and validity or title of unpatented mining claims and concessions are often uncertain and may be contested. We also may not have, or may not be able to obtain, all necessary surface rights to develop a property. Although we have taken reasonable measures to ensure proper title to our properties, there is no guarantee of title to our properties or that competing ownership claims or encumbrances respecting our properties will not be made in the future. Title insurance is generally not available for mineral properties and our ability to ensure that we have obtained secure claims to individual mineral properties or mining concessions may be severely constrained. Our mineral properties may be subject to prior unregistered agreements, transfers or claims, and title may be affected by, among other things, undetected defects. We may incur significant costs related to defending the title to our properties. A successful claim contesting our title to a property may cause us to compensate other persons or perhaps reduce our interest in the affected property or lose our rights to explore and, if warranted, develop that property. This could result in us not being compensated for our prior expenditures relating to the property. Also, in any such case, the investigation and resolution of title issues would divert our management’s time from ongoing exploration and, if warranted, development programs. Any impairment or defect in title could have a negative impact on us.

We are subject to operational hazards and risks that could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial performance.

We are subject to risks typical in the mining business. These include, but are not limited to, operational issues such as unexpected geological conditions or earthquakes causing unanticipated increases in the costs of extraction or leading to falls of ground and rock bursts, particularly as mining moves into deeper levels. Major cave-ins, flooding or fires could also occur under extreme conditions. Although equipment is monitored and maintained and all staff receive safety training, accidents caused by equipment failure or human error could occur. Such occurrences could result in damage to, or destruction of, mineral properties or production facilities, personal injury or death, environmental damage, delays in mining, monetary losses and possible legal liability. As a result, we may incur significant liabilities and costs that could have a material adverse effect upon our business, results of operations and financial performance.

Lawsuits may be filed against us and an adverse ruling in any such lawsuit could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial performance.

We may become party to legal claims arising in the ordinary course of business. There can be no assurance that unforeseen circumstances resulting in legal claims will not result in significant costs or losses. The outcome of outstanding, pending or future proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty and may be determined adversely to us and as a result, could have a material adverse effect on our assets, liabilities, business, financial condition and results of operations. Even if we prevail in any such legal proceedings, the proceedings could be costly and time-consuming and may divert the attention of management and key personnel from our business operations, which could adversely affect our financial condition. In the event of a dispute arising in respect of our foreign operations, we may be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of foreign courts or may not be successful in subjecting foreign persons to the jurisdiction of courts in the United States of America, South Africa, Zimbabwe, Canada, the United Kingdom, Jersey Channel Islands or international arbitration. The legal and political environments in which we operate may make it more likely that laws will not be enforced and that judgments will not be upheld. If we are unsuccessful in enforcing our rights under the agreements to which we are party to or judgments that have been granted, or if laws are not appropriately enforced, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial performance.

We face risks related to illegal mining at Blanket Mine and no assurance can be provided that such illegal mining will not have ~~a material~~an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial performance.

Illegal mining activities on properties controlled by Blanket have been identified. This gives rise to increased security costs and an increased risk of theft and damage to equipment. Blanket has received adequate support and assistance from the Zimbabwean police in investigating such cases but there can be no guarantee that the support from the Zimbabwean police will continue and whether their support will stop illegal mining activities.

Most of our employees are members of the Associated Mine Workers Union of Zimbabwe and any work stoppage or industrial action implemented by the union may affect our business, results of operations and financial performance.

Most of the employees are members of the Associated Mine Workers Union of Zimbabwe. Pay rates for all wage-earning staff are negotiated on a Zimbabwe industry-wide basis between the union and representatives of the mine owners. Any industrial action called by the union may affect our operations even though our operations may not be at the root cause of the action. Strikes, lockouts or other work stoppages could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial performance. In addition, any work stoppage or labor disruption at key customers or service providers could impede our ability to supply products, to receive critical equipment and supplies for our operations or to collect payment from customers encountering labor disruptions. Work stoppages or other labor disruptions could increase our costs or impede our ability to operate.

There can be no assurance that changes to any environmental, health and safety laws to which we are currently subject would not adversely affect our exploration and development programs.

Our exploration, development and operations are subject to environment, health and safety (“EH&S”) laws and regulations (“~~EH&S~~”) in the countries in which the relevant activity is being conducted.

In 2018, a training facility (called the Nyanzvi initiative) was established at Blanket using dedicated facilities and specially trained facilitators. A total of 120 senior supervisors participated in the Nyanzvi initiative during the last quarter of 2019, with the heads of departments at Blanket completing the programme in January 2020, thereby completing the training of Blanket’s workforce as was required. As a result of this increased focus on safety training, there were no fatal accidents in 2019, and the total number of accidents was reduced from 45 in 2018 to 31 in 2019. Safety training is an ongoing exercise and it will remain an area of focus for the Company. There is no assurance, however, that future changes in EH&S, if any, will not adversely affect our exploration and development programs or our operations. There isare no ~~assurance~~assurances that regulatory and environmental approvals required under EH&S will be obtained on a timely basis or if at all. A breach of EH&S may result in the temporary suspension of operations, the imposition of fines, other penalties (including administrative penalties and regulatory prosecution), and government orders, which could potentially have a material adverse effect on operations.

Due to the nature of our business, our operations face extensive EH&S risks.

Gold mining is exposed to numerous risks and events, the occurrence of which may result in the death of, or personal injury, to employees. EH&S legislation applicable to us could suspend part or all of our operations. EH&S incidents could therefore lead to increased unit production costs or lower production which could negatively affect our business, operating and/or financial results.

We may enter into acquisitions or other material transactions at any time.

We continually seek to replace and expand our reserves through the exploration of our existing properties and may expand through acquisitions of interests in new properties or of interests in companies ~~which~~that own such properties. Acquisitions involve a number of risks, including: the possibility that we, as a successor owner, may be legally and financially responsible for liabilities of prior owners; the possibility that we may pay more than the acquired company or assets are worth; the additional expenses associated with completing an acquisition and amortizing any acquired intangible assets; the difficulty of integrating the operations and personnel of an acquired business; the challenge of implementing uniform standards, controls, procedures and policies throughout an acquired business; the inability to integrate, train, retain and motivate key personnel of an acquired business; and the potential disruption of our ongoing business and the distraction of management from its day-to-day operations. These risks and difficulties, if they materialize, could disrupt our ongoing business, distract management, result in the loss of key personnel, increase expenses and may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial performance.

As a foreign private issuer, we are permitted to file less information with the SEC than a company that is not a foreign private issuer or that files as a domestic issuer.

As a foreign private issuer, we are exempt from certain rules under the Exchange Act that impose disclosure requirements as well as procedural requirements for proxy solicitations under Section 14 of the Exchange Act. In addition, our officers, directors and principal shareholders are exempt from the reporting and “short-swing” profit recovery provisions of Section 16 of the Exchange Act. Moreover, we are not required to file periodic reports and financial statements with the SEC as frequently or as promptly as a company that files as a domestic issuer whose securities are registered under the Exchange Act, nor are we generally required to comply with the SEC’s Regulation FD, which restricts the selective disclosure of material non-public information. For as long as we are a “foreign private issuer” we intend to file our annual financial statements on Form 20-F and furnish our quarterly financial statements on Form 6-K to the SEC for so long as we are subject to the reporting requirements of Section 13(g) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. However, the information we file or furnish is not the same as the information that is required in annual and quarterly reports on Form 10-K or Form 10-Q for U.S. domestic issuers. Accordingly, there may be less information publicly available concerning us than there is for a company that files as a domestic issuer.

We may lose our foreign private issuer status, which would then require us to comply with the Exchange Act’s domestic reporting regime and cause us to incur additional legal, accounting and other expenses.

We are required to determine our status as a foreign private issuer on an annual basis at the end of our second fiscal quarter. In order to maintain our current status as a foreign private issuer, either (1) a majority of our shares must be either directly or indirectly owned of record by non-residents of the United States or (2) (a) a majority of our executive officers or directors must not be U.S. citizens or residents, (b) more than 50 percent of our assets cannot be located in the United States and (c) our business must be administered principally outside the United States. If we lost this status, we would be required to comply with the Exchange Act reporting and other requirements applicable to U.S. domestic issuers, which are more detailed and extensive than the requirements for foreign private issuers. We would also be subject to additional restrictions on offers and sales of securities outside the United States and would have to comply with the generally more restrictive Regulation S requirements under the Securities Act that apply to U.S. domestic ~~companies,~~issuers, which could limit our ability to access capital markets in the future. The regulatory and compliance costs to us under U.S. securities laws if we are required to comply with the reporting requirements applicable to a U.S. domestic issuer may be higher than the cost we would incur as a foreign private issuer. As a result, we expect that a loss of foreign private issuer status would increase our legal and financial compliance costs.

We are an emerging growth company and we cannot be certain if the reduced disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies may make our shares less attractive to investors and, as a result, adversely affect the price of our shares and result in a less active trading market for our shares.

We are an ~~emerging~~“emerging growth ~~company~~company” as defined in the JOBS Act, and we may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that ~~are applicable~~apply to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies. For example, we have ~~elected to rely on~~qualified for an exemption from the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act relating to internal control over financial reporting, and we will not provide such an attestation from our auditors.

We may avail ourselves of these disclosure exemptions until we are no longer an emerging growth company. We cannot predict whether investors will find our shares less attractive because of our reliance on some or all of these exemptions. If investors find our shares less attractive, it may adversely impact the price of our shares and there may be a less active trading market for our shares.

We will cease to be an emerging growth company upon the earliest of:

·•	the last day of the fiscal year during which we have total annual gross revenues of ~~$1,000,000,000~~$1,070,000,000 (as such amount is indexed for inflation every five years by the SEC or more);

·
•	the last day of our fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of the completion of our first sale of equity securities pursuant to an effective registration statement under the Securities Act;

·
•	the date on which we have, during the previous three-year period, issued more than $1,000,000,000 in non- convertible debt; or

·
•	the date on which we are deemed to be a “large accelerated filer”, as defined in Rule 12b–2 of the Exchange Act, which would occur if the market value of our shares that are held by non-affiliates exceeds $700,000,000 as of the last day of our most recently-completed second fiscal quarter.

If we fail to establish and maintain proper internal controls, our ability to produce accurate financial statements or comply with applicable regulations could be impaired.

Section 404(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires that our management assess and report annually on the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting and identify any material weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting. Although Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires our independent registered public accounting firm to issue an annual report that addresses the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting, we have opted to rely on the exemptions provided to us by virtue of being a foreign private issuer and an emerging growth company, and consequently will not be required to comply with SEC rules that implement Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act until we lose our emerging growth company status.

If either we are unable to conclude that we have effective internal controls over financial reporting or, at the appropriate time, our independent auditors are unwilling or unable to provide us with an unqualified report on the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting as required by Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, investors may lose confidence in our operating results, the price of our shares could decline and we may be subject to litigation or regulatory enforcement actions.

There is uncertainty with our Mineral Reserve estimates.

Our mineral reserve figures described in this document are management’s best estimates and are reported in accordance with the requirements of Industry Guide 7 (“IG 7”) of the SEC. These estimates may not reflect actual reserves or future production. Should we encounter mineralization or formations different from those predicted by past drilling, sampling and similar examinations, reserve estimates may have to be adjusted and mining plans may have to be altered in a way that might ultimately cause our reserve estimates to decline. Moreover, if the gold price declines, or if our labor, consumable, electricity and other production costs increase or recovery rates decrease, it may become uneconomical to recover our reserves. Under these circumstances, we would be required to re-evaluate our reserves. The reserve estimates are based on drilling results and because unforeseen conditions may occur, the actual results may vary from the initial estimates. These factors could result in reductions in our reserve estimates, which could in turn adversely impact the total value of our business.

There are differences in IG 7 and Canadian reporting of mineral reserves and mineral resources.

From time to time, we also report mineral resources in accordance with the Canadian requirements outlined in Canadian National Instrument 43-101 which are not directly comparable to IG 7 mineral reporting and disclosure requirements. The terms “mineral resource”, “measured mineral resource”, “indicated mineral resource” and “inferred mineral resource” are defined in and sometimes used by the Company pursuant to Canadian National Instrument 43-101; however, these terms are not defined terms under IG 7 and historically have not been permitted to be used in reports and registration statements filed in accordance with IG 7. Investors are cautioned not to assume that any part of or all mineral deposits in these categories will ever be converted into reserves. “Inferred mineral resources” have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence, and as to their economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of the measured mineral resources, indicated mineral resources, or inferred mineral resources will ever be upgraded to a higher category.

Investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource exists or is economically or legally mineable. Disclosure of “contained ounces” is permitted disclosure under Canadian regulations; however, IG 7 has historically only permitted issuers to report “resources” as in-place tonnage and grade without reference to unit measures. Accordingly, information concerning descriptions of mineralization and resources contained in some of our reports may not be comparable to information made public in accordance with IG 7.

Further, the terms “Mineral Reserve”, “Proven Mineral Reserve” and “Probable Mineral Reserve” are Canadian mining terms as defined in accordance with Canadian National Instrument 43-101 and the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum standards. These definitions differ from the definitions in IG 7. Under IG 7 standards, a “final” or “bankable” feasibility study is required to report reserves, the three-year historical average price is used in any reserve or cash flow analysis to designate reserves and all necessary permits or governmental authorizations must be filed with the appropriate governmental authority.

Accordingly, the information contained in some of the reports containing descriptions of the Company's mineral deposits may not be comparable to similar information made public in accordance with IG 7.

U.S. investors may not be able to enforce their civil liabilities against us or our directors and officers.

It may be difficult to bring and enforce suits against us, because we were amalgamated and exist under the laws of Jersey, Channel Islands and are situated in Jersey, Channel Islands and do not have assets located in the United States.

All our assets are located outside the United States and most of our directors and all of our officers are residents of countries other than the United States. As a result, it may be difficult for investors to effect service of process on us or these non-United States resident persons within the United States or to rely in the United States upon judgments obtained in the United States based on the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws against us or our officers and non-United States resident directors. In addition, our U.S. shareholders should not assume that the courts of Jersey, Channel Islands (i) would enforce judgments of U.S. courts obtained in actions against us, our officers or directors predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws or other laws of the United States, or (ii) would enforce, in original actions, liabilities against us, our officers or directors predicated upon the U.S. federal securities laws or other laws of the United States.

We are incorporated under the laws of Jersey, Channel Islands and our principal offices are located outside of the United States which could have negative tax consequences for U.S. investors.

We are incorporated under the laws of Jersey, Channel Islands and are located outside of the United States. Accordingly, U.S. investors could be subject to negative tax consequences. If we choose to make an offering of securities in the United States, the applicable prospectus is expected to include a discussion of the material United States tax consequences relating to the purchase, ownership and disposition of any securities offered thereby, to the extent not set out in this Annual Report; however, investors should consult their own tax advisors as to the consequences of investing in Caledonia.

ITEM 4 - INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY

History and Development of the Company

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc (previously Caledonia Mining Corporation) was incorporated, effective February 5, 1992, by the amalgamation of three predecessor companies itand was registered at the time under the Canada Business Corporations Act.

Following the creation of Caledonia its shares were listed ~~for trading~~ on the ~~Toronto Stock Exchange~~TSX and quoted on the NASDAQ small caps market. On October 16, 1998, Caledonia announced that NASDAQ would no longer quote its securities for trading. Caledonia’s stock ~~then~~ commenced trading on NASDAQ’s OTCQX. In June 2005, Caledonia was admitted to AIM under the ticker symbol “CMCL”. Our Toronto Stock Exchange trading symbol is “CAL”. Effective October 10, 2011 the shares commenced trading in the U.S. on the OTCQX under the ticker symbol CALVF.

Effective March 19, 2016, the Company re-domiciled from Canada to Jersey using a legal process called “Continuance”. The Continuance had no effect on the Company’s listings in Toronto and trading on AIM in London, or the trading facility on the OTCQX in ~~the USA~~.

~~The addresses and telephone numbers of Caledonia’s principal offices are:~~

~~Registered and Head Office~~

~~African Office - South Africa~~

~~Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc~~	~~Caledonia Mining South Africa Proprietary Limited~~
3^rd ~~Floor, Weighbridge House, St Helier~~	4^th ~~Floor, 1 Quadrum office park~~
~~Jersey, Channel Islands~~	~~Johannesburg, Gauteng, 2198~~
~~JE2 3NF~~	~~South Africa~~
~~(44) 1534 679 9800~~	~~(27) 11 447 2499~~

~~Background~~

June 2005.

Effective April 1, 2006 the Company purchased 100% of the issued shares of the Zimbabwean company, Caledonia Holdings Zimbabwe (Private) Ltd (“CHZ”)~~, which~~ that held 100% of the shares of ~~Blanket Mine (1983) (Private) Limited, the owner of the operating~~ Blanket Mine. The purchase consideration was $1,000,000 and ~~the issuance to the vendor of~~ 20,000,000 shares of Caledonia. The Company acquired all the assets and assumed all the liabilities of CHZ.

The Company re-domiciled from Canada to Jersey using a legal process called “Continuance” on March 19, 2016. The Company operates under the Companies (Jersey) Law 1991, as amended, (the “Companies Law”). The Continuance had no effect on the Company’s listing on the TSX or on the trading facilities on AIM in London or on the OTCQX in the ~~capital~~United States of ~~Caledonia. Because~~America.

On July 24, 2017 the Company ~~bought~~announced that its shares would be listed on the ~~shares~~NYSE American and trading began on July 27, 2017. The trading of the ~~company owning~~Company’s shares on the OTCQX ceased upon the commencement of trading on the NYSE American.

As at the date of this report Caledonia’s shares trade on AIM under the ticker symbol “CMCL”, are listed on the TSX under the symbol “CAL” and on the NYSE American as “CMCL”.

The addresses and telephone numbers of Caledonia’s principal offices are:

Registered and Head Office	African Office - South African Subsidiaries

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc	Caledonia Mining South Africa Proprietary Limited
B006 Millais House, Castle Quay, St Helier	4^th Floor, 1 Quadrum office park
Jersey, Channel Islands	Johannesburg, Gauteng, 2198
JE2 3EF	South Africa
(44) 1534 679 800	(27) 11 447 2499

Indigenization of Blanket Mine

On February 20, 2012 certain companies within Caledonia’s group of companies (the “Group”) announced that they had signed a Memorandum of Understanding (“MoU”) with the Minister of Youth, Development, Indigenization and Empowerment of the Government of Zimbabwe pursuant to which the Group agreed that indigenous Zimbabweans would acquire an effective 51% ownership interest in the Blanket Mine ~~it thereby acquired all~~for a transactional value of $30.09 million. Pursuant to the ~~assets of that company and assumed all of its liabilities.~~

~~Description of Our Business~~

~~Caledonia’s activities are focused on Blanket Mine in Zimbabwe. The Company’s business during~~above, the ~~past three completed fiscal years has been focused primarily on the operation of the Blanket Mine and increasing gold production at Blanket Mine.~~

~~Generally, gold mining, development and exploration in Southern Africa is not seasonal, except where heavy seasonal rainfall can affect surface mining or exploration.~~

~~Total gold production at Blanket Mine for 2016 was 50,351oz (2015:~~ ~~42,804 oz.; 2014~~: ~~41,771 oz.). The aggregate production at Blanket Mine from January 1, 2017 to February 28, 2017 was 8,013 oz.~~

~~Indigenisation of Blanket Mine~~

~~During 2012, to comply with Zimbabwean law that requires indigenous Zimbabweans own at least 51% of Blanket Mine, CHZ~~Group entered into agreements with each indigenous shareholder to transfer a 51% of the Group’s ownership interest in Blanket Mine ~~which did the following:~~

whereby it:

·•	sold a 16% interest to the ~~National Indigenisation and Economic Empowerment Fund (“NIEEF”)~~NIEEF for $11.74 million;

·•	sold a 15% interest to Fremiro, ~~Investments (Private) Limited (“Fremiro”),~~ which is owned by indigenous Zimbabweans, for $11.01 million;

sold a 10% interest to Blanket Employee Trust Services (Private) Limited (“BETS”) for the benefit of present and future managers and employees for $7.34 million. The shares in BETS are held by the Blanket Mine Employee Trust (“Employee Trust”) with Blanket Mine’s employees holding participation units in the Employee Trust; and

sold a 10% interest to Blanket Employee Trust Services (Private) Limited (“BETS”) for the benefit of present and future managers and employees for $7.34 million. The shares in BETS are held by the Blanket Mine Employee Trust (the “Employee Trust”) with Blanket Mine’s employees holding participation units in the Employee Trust; and

·	~~donated a 10% ownership interest to the Gwanda Community Share Ownership Trust (“Community Trust”). In addition Blanket Mine paid a non-refundable donation of $1 million to the Community Trust.~~

donated a 10% ownership interest to the Gwanda Community Share Ownership Trust (“Community Trust”). In addition Blanket Mine paid a non-refundable donation of $1 million to the Community Trust.

Following completion of the underlying subscription agreements, advances were made to NIEEF and the Community Trust against their rights to receive dividends declared by Blanket Mine on their shareholdings as follows:

~~Caledonia~~a $1.8 million payment to NIEEF on or about June 21, 2012;

a $2 million payment to the Community Trust on or before September 30, 2012;

a $1 million payment to the Community Trust on or before February 28, 2013; and

a $1 million payment to the Community Trust on or before April 30, 2013.

Advances made to NIEEF as an advanced dividend loan were settled through dividend repayments in 2014. Refer to note 6 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for the outstanding balance of the advanced dividend loan with the Community Trust.

The Group facilitated the vendor funding of these transactions and the advanced dividend loans which isare repaid by way of dividends from Blanket Mine. 100% of dividends declared by Blanket Mine as payable to the Community Trust were used to repay its advanced dividend loan although Blanket has recently agreed that from the beginning of 2020 80% of dividends declared by Blanket Mine ~~are~~will be used to repay such ~~loans~~loan and the remaining 20% will unconditionally ~~accrues~~accrue to the ~~respective~~Community Trust, which is the same arrangement that applies to the other indigenous shareholders.

~~Outstanding balances on the facilitation loans attract interest at a rate of 10% over the 12-month LIBOR.~~ The timing of the repayment of the loans depends on the future financial performance of Blanket Mine and the extent of future dividends declared by Blanket Mine.

Subsequent to the indigenization transactions the facilitation loans relating to the Group were transferred as a dividend in specie to the Company.

On June 23, 2017, the Group, Blanket Mine ~~suspended dividend payments in December 2014 so that it could fund~~and the ~~capital projects in~~indigenous shareholders of Blanket Mine reached agreement to change the interest terms of ~~the Investment Plan (see below) and had a moratorium of interest on~~ the facilitation and advanced dividend ~~loans~~loan agreements. The agreements changed the interest rate from ~~December 31, 2014~~the previously agreed 12-month LIBOR + 10% to ~~July 31, 2016.~~the lower of a fixed 7.25% per annum, payable quarterly or 80% of the Blanket Mine ~~resumed~~ dividend ~~payments~~in the quarter. The modification was considered beneficial to the indigenous shareholders and gave rise to an equity-settled share-based expense of $806,000 on ~~August 1, 2016 as a result of which~~June 23, 2017 when all parties reached agreement to modify the ~~moratorium of~~ interest oncharged. It was agreed that the interest change was to be applied to the facilitation and ~~advance~~advanced dividend ~~loans ended.~~

loan balances from January 1, 2017.

Pronouncements from the Zimbabwe Government following the appointment of the new President in late 2017 declared a relaxation in the indigenization policy which, amongst other things, included the removal of an indigenization requirement for gold mining companies. These pronouncements were passed into law in March 2018. In light of the changed legislation, on November 6, 2018, the Company announced that it had entered into a sale agreement with Fremiro to purchase Femiro’s 15% shareholding in Blanket for a gross consideration of $16.667 million to be settled through a combination of the cancellation of the loan between the two entities (which stood at $11.467 million as at June 30, 2018) and the issue of 727,266 new shares in Caledonia at an issue price of $7.15 per share. On completion of the transaction on January 20, 2020, Caledonia owned 64% in Blanket and Fremiro held approximately 6.3% of Caledonia’s shares. The Company is also evaluating the potential to buy NIEEF’s shareholding in Blanket. There is no certainty that agreement will be reached on a transaction in respect of NIEEF’s shareholding.

Capital Investment

The main capital development project is the central shaft at the Blanket Mine (“Central Shaft”) which will allow for three new production levels below the current operations; a fourth level is intended to be added in due course via a decline construction. Shaft sinking commenced in early 2015 and the shaft reached its target depth of 1,204 metres (approx. 4,000 feet) in July 2019. Work on equipping the shaft has commenced and it is expected to be commissioned in the last quarter of 2020 after which production ramp-up can commence: production in 2021 is expected to be approximately 75,000 ounces, increasing to the target rate of 80,000 ounces in 2022.

Work on underground development was hampered by the unstable electricity supply which has caused frequent power interruptions and by systemic power outages due to the general lack of electricity in Zimbabwe. In November 2019 further diesel generators were installed so that work at Central shaft can continue uninterrupted throughout any interruptions to the electricity supply from the grid.

In addition to the Central shaft, work continued on decline developments at the AR South, AR Main and Eroica ore bodies, preparations commenced for a further decline at the Blanket orebody and work continued on haulages on the 870m level. In total 417 meters of development were achieved in the last quarter of 2019.

Total cash capital expenditure increased to $20,240,000 (2018: $20,192,000; 2017: $21,639,000). Significant projects on which capital expenditures were incurred in 2019 included:

•	Central shaft – $12.5 million
•	Oxygen plant - $1.6 million
•	Deep drilling – $574,262
•	Underground equipment - $465,020
•	Load Haul Dumpers - $413,000

Capital projects and expenditures are further analyzed under Item 4.B Mining Operations and note 18 of the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Eersteling Gold Mining Company Limited

On May 31, 2018 the Group entered into an amended share sale agreement with SH Mineral Investments Proprietary Limited (“SH Minerals”) to sell the shares and claims of Eersteling Gold Mining Company Limited (“Eersteling”), a South African subsidiary previously consolidated as part of the Group, that has been on care and maintenance since 1997. The ~~facilitation loans~~amended share sale agreement allowed for a purchase price of $3 million which would be settled by three payments of $1 million payable on the completion date, 12 and 18 months after the completion date. On January 31, 2019 all conditions for the sale were ~~declared by CHZ (Blanket Mine’s parent company)~~met and the Group transferred the registered and beneficial ownership of Eersteling to ~~a wholly-owned subsidiary~~SH Minerals. During 2019, the ZAR equivalent of ~~Caledonia,~~$1 million was received and the ZAR equivalent of approximately $0.9 million was received post year-end as ~~a dividend in specie.~~

~~Employees~~

Aspayment towards the next instalment of ~~December 31, 2016,~~the purchase price with the remainder of that instalment expected to be received shortly.

Available Information

The SEC maintains an internet site (http://www.sec.gov) that contains report, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. Such information can also be found on the Company’s ~~employees comprised of 782 permanent employees and 521 contractors. Of this number, Blanket Mine has 764 permanent employees and 518 contractors.~~

~~Significant Acquisitions or Developments~~

~~Caledonia did not complete any significant dispositions or significant acquisitions for which disclosure is required since the end of the most recently completed financial year.~~

website (http://www.caledoniamining.com).

Business Overview

~~Mining~~

Description of Our Business

Caledonia’s primary focus is the operation of a gold mine and ~~On-Mine Exploration Activities:~~

~~Gold Production~~

~~Background~~

the exploration and development of mineral properties for precious metals. Caledonia’s activities are focused on Blanket Mine ~~is located approximately 560 km south~~in Zimbabwe. The Company’s business during the last three completed fiscal years has been focused primarily on increasing production to 80,000 oz. of Harare, the capital city of Zimbabwe and 150 km south of Bulawayo, the country’s second largest city. The town of Gwanda, the provincial capital of Matabeleland South, is located 16 km southeast of the mine and is approximately 197 km north north-west of the South African border post of Beit Bridge. The mine is situated in the Gwanda Greenstone Belt from which gold was first produced in the 1800’s. Blanket Mine holds extensive exploration properties throughout this belt. The Blanket Mine property was first staked in 1904 with mining and metallurgical plant operations starting in 1906 and has since produced over a million ounces of gold.

~~Geological Setting~~

~~Like most of the~~by 2022 through its investment plan.

Total gold mines in Zimbabwe, Blanket Mine is situated in a typical Archaean greenstone terrain, the 70 km long by 15 km wide Gwanda greenstone belt. This terrain comprises supra crustal metavolcanic rocks similar to those found in the Barberton area of South Africa and the Abitibi area of Canada. The Blanket Mine property is the largest of the three remaining large gold producers in a greenstone belt that has given rise to approximately 268 gold mines.

~~Property Geology~~

Blanket Mine is part of the group of mines that makes up the North Western Mining Camp also called the Sabiwa Group of mines. Blanket Mine consists of 9 deposits forming a north-south trend, extending from Sabiwa and Jethro in the south, through Blanket itself to the Feudal, AR South, AR Main, Sheet, Eroica and Lima ore bodies. The geological sequence strikes north-south, dips near-vertically and consists, from east to west, of three main units, a lower Felsic Unit overlain by a Mafic Unit which is in turn capped by an Intermediate Unit to the west. The basal Felsic Unit consists of quartz-sericite schist and is not known to be mineralized. The overlying central Mafic Unit is comprised of a lower sequence of ultramafic (komatiitic) lava flows interlayered with banded iron formation and an upper mafic lava sequence of massive and pillowed lavas. The banded iron formation layers host the mineralized bodies of the adjacent Vubachikwe Mine complex to the south while the Mafic Unit hosts the active Blanket Mine ore bodies in the northern section. The andesitic Intermediate Unit which lies to the west, caps this whole stratigraphy and in not gold-bearing. A sub-horizontal regional dolerite sill cuts the entire sequence from Blanket through to Vubachikwe Mine.

~~Characteristics of the Blanket Mine deposits~~

~~Ore bodies~~production at Blanket Mine ~~are~~for 2019 was 55,182 oz. (2018: 54,511 oz.; 2017: 56,133 oz.). In terms of ~~hydrothermal origin~~regulations introduced by the Zimbabwean Ministry of Finance in January 2014, all gold produced in Zimbabwe must be sold to Fidelity, a company which is controlled by the Zimbabwean authorities. Gold producers compete globally based on their operating and ~~are associated with a syn-metamorphic regionally developed transgressive deformation zone in the Mafic Unit lavas up~~capital costs. Certain gold producers benefit from their ability to 500 metres wide. The deformation zone is characterized by areas of sheared rock wrapping around unsheared remnants of the original basaltic lava flows. It is within the highly sheared zones that the majority of the ore bodies occur. Two main types of gold mineralization are recognized, viz. disseminated sulphide replacement reefs which are massive to pipe-like bodies, and quartz reefs and shears which are tabular. At Vubachikwe Mine gold mineralization is hosted within the lower zone of the Mafic Unit, which comprises ultramafic rocks and banded iron formations. Gold-bearing sulphide minerals occur as a replacement of iron-richproduce other minerals in ~~fold hinge zones. Ore bodies occurs in near-vertical shoots along an approximate north−south axis.~~

~~Disseminated Sulphide Replacement Type Mineralization: Most~~commercial quantities as by-products. Caledonia derives approximately 0.1% of the ore shoots at Blanket Mine are of the disseminated sulphide replacement (DSR) type mineralization. The ore shoots displaying DSR type mineralization have a siliceous core with fine-grained arsenopyrite towards the periphery. These fine sprays of disseminated arsenopyrite host the best gold grades. Surrounding the massive siliceous zone is a lower grade aureole of biotite-chlorite schist. The outermost chlorite-carbonate schist zone shows a further decline in grade. Disseminated sulphide replacement ore bodies range in width up to 30 m in the case of the AR ore bodies which are lensoid in plan and have a strike to maximum width ratio of about 2:1. The remaining DSR bodies have widths up the 10 m and strike between 60 m and 90 m in length.

Quartz Reef Mineralization: Two quartz-filled shear zones are mined at Blanket Mine, viz. the Blanket Quartz Reef and the Eroica Reef. These reefs have long strike lengths but are not uniformly mineralized. Grade fluctuations are more extreme in the quartz reefs than in the DSR type reefs but on average these quartz shears have higher grades and are used as a sweetener of ore to the mill. The Quartz Reef at Blanket has a surface strike of some 500 m and width up to 5 m, diminishing with depth, with an average dip of 55° to the west.

Gold: Of the total gold content in the ore, about 50% is free-milling while the remainder is occluded within arsenopyrite. Blanket ores are not refractory and plant recoveries of 93% are typically achieved. Silver constitutes about 10% of the gravity gold,its revenues from silver, which is ~~normal for greenstone gold deposits.~~

~~Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve Calculations~~

~~The Technical Report dated December 1, 2014 relating to~~insignificant. 100% of Blanket’s revenues over the last three years was derived from its operations in Zimbabwe.

Blanket ~~Mine was prepared by Minxcon Pty Ltd (“Minxcon~~”), in compliance with NI 43-101. Minxcon is a mining industry consulting company based in South Africa. Minxcon reviewed the mineral reserve and mineral resource calculation procedures for the Blanket Mine as at August 31, 2014. Minxcon’s mineral resource and mineral reserve estimatesMine’s available reserves are ~~set out in the following tables:~~

~~MINERAL RESOURCES – (August 2014)~~

Mineral Resource Category
Tonnes
(metric)

Grade
(Au g/t)

Gold Content
(ounces)

Measured Resources 1,572,733 3.91 197,606
Indicated Resources 2,478,902 3.77 300,288
Total Measured and Indicated 4,051,635 3.82 497,895
Inferred Resources* 3,344,831 5.11 549,963

~~Notes:~~

1.	~~Resource estimate is based on a gold price of US$1,300/oz.~~

2.	~~Mineral Resources are stated at a 1.96 g/t cut-off.~~

3.	~~Tonnages are stated at an~~ ~~in-situ~~ ~~relative density of 2.86 t/m~~³.

4.	~~Inferred Resources are expressed separately from the Measured and Indicated category.~~

*Inferred resources have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence and as to whether they can be mined economically. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of the inferred resource will be upgraded to a higher resource or reserve category.

~~MINERAL RESERVES – (October, 2014)~~

Mineral Reserve Category
Tonnes
(metric)

Grade
(Au g/t)

Gold Content
(ounces)

Proven Reserves 856,005 3.40 93,638
Probable Reserves 2,077,828 3.78 252,758
Total Proven & Probable Reserves 2,933,833 3.67 346,396

~~Notes:~~

1.	~~As noted above, Mineral Reserves are also included in the above table of Mineral Resources.~~

2.	~~Reserve estimate is based on a gold price of US$1,250/oz. and a cash cost of US$71/tonne milled.~~

3.	~~Blanket Mine’s pay limit (cut-off grade) is 2.03 g/t.~~

4.	~~Reserve tonnages have been diluted by 5 to 10% at zero grade to yield RoM tonnages (delivered to mill).~~

~~Cautionary note to U.S. Investors concerning estimates of Inferred and Indicated Resources~~.

The above tables use the terms “inferred resources” and “indicated resources.” While these terms are recognized and required by Canadian regulations, the SEC does not recognize them. They have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence, and great uncertainty as to their economic feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an Inferred or Indicated Mineral Resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category. ~~Investors are cautioned not to assume that part or all of an inferred or indicated resource exists or is economically mineable.~~

~~The full Technical Report can be viewed on the Company’s website – www.caledoniamining.com or~~disclosed under Item 4.D under the ~~Company’s profile on the System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (“SEDAR”) at~~ ~~www.sedar.com~~.

~~Since the calculation~~subheading of the above resource estimates as at August 31, 2014, the Company has mined 1,082,242 tonnes with an average recovered gold grade of 3.16 grams per tonne, the majority of which has been from within the reserve blocks to produce 106,513 ounces of gold at a recovery of 93.0%. An updated internal estimate of Blanket Mine’s mineral reserves and resources as at December 31, 2016 has been prepared by Blanket Mine’s Technical Department following the standards and procedures required by NI 43‑101. In preparing the Mineral Resource and Mineral“Mineral Reserve estimates, the following assumptions and modifying factors were applied. A cut-off grade (pay limit) of 1.81 g/t based on a gold price of US$1,300/oz. and a cash cost of US$65/t, were applied for both the Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves. Tonnages were increased by between 5% and 10% to allow for dilution at zero grade and the grade adjusted accordingly. A metallurgical recovery of 93% was applied, equivalent to the current achieved recovered grade. The Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource estimates included in this Annual Report have been reviewed and approved by Dr Trevor Pearton, Caledonia’s qualified person (within the meaning of NI 43-101) and the results are presented in the following tables:

~~MINERAL RESOURCES – December 31, 2016~~

Mineral Resource Category
Tonnes
(metric)

Grade
(Au g/t)

Gold Content
(ounces)

Measured Resources 1,532,000 4.04 198,800
Indicated Resources 3,408,700 4.31 472,600
Total Measured and Indicated 4,940,700 4.23 671,400
Inferred Resources* 3,764,000 4.99 604,000

~~Notes:~~

1.	~~Resource estimate is based on a gold price of US$1,300/oz. and a cash cost of US$65/t.~~

2.	~~Mineral Resources are stated at a 1.81 g/t cut-off.~~

3.	~~Mineral Resources are reported inclusive of Mineral Reserves.~~

4.	~~Tonnages are rounded to the nearest 100 and ounces to the nearest 100.~~

5.	~~Tonnages are stated at an~~ ~~in-situ~~ ~~relative density of 2.86 t/m~~³.

6.	~~Inferred Resources are expressed separately from the Measured and Indicated category.~~

Inferred Resources have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence and as to whether they can be mined economically or legally. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of the inferred resource will be upgraded to a higher resource or reserve category.

Caledonia has adopted a conservative approach to accruing new resources: only resource blocks with an estimated grade in excess of the current pay limit are taken into resource inventory. Resources that are below the pay limit are reviewed on an annual basis.

~~MINERAL RESERVES – December 31, 2016~~

Mineral Reserve Category
Tonnnes
(metric)

Grade
(Au g/t)
Gold Content (ounces)
Proven Reserves 798,900 3.70 95,000
Probable Reserves 2,061,000 3.64 241,300
Total Proven & Probable Reserves 2,859,900 3.66 336,300

~~Notes:~~

~~Mineral Resources are reported inclusive of Mineral Reserves.~~

~~Reserve estimate is based on a gold price of US$1,300/oz. and a cash cost of US$65/t milled.~~

~~Blanket Mine’s pay limit (cut-off) is 1.81 g/t.~~

~~Reserve tonnages have been diluted by 5 to 10% at zero grade to yield RoM tonnages (delivered to mill).~~

~~Tonnages are rounded to the nearest 100 and ounces to the nearest 100.~~

Blanket Mine’s Measured and Indicated Resources as at December 31, 2016 have increased by 193,800 tonnes or 33,000 ounces (5%) compared to December 31, 2015. Proven and Probable Reserves have increased by 230,000 tonnes or 39,000 ounces (13%) over the same period. Relative to the independent estimate of mineral resources and mineral reserves as at August 31, 2014, the Reserves have decreased by 2.5% in terms of tonnage after replenishing the 1.08 million tonnes that has been mined subsequent to the report date. Resources (measured and indicated) expressed in terms of tonnage have increased by 22% over the same period.

Blanket Mine has reported a conversion of resources to reserves of 106% for the Year. While Blanket Mine has recorded a conversion of resources to reserves of approximately 100% over the past 10 years, this high rate of conversion cannot be assumed to occur in future.

~~Production Operations~~

Calculations”.

Mining Operations

On November 3, 2014 Caledonia announced the ~~Investment Plan~~investment plan and production projections for the Blanket Mine. The objectives of the ~~Investment Plan~~investment plan are to improve the underground infrastructure and logistics to allow an efficient and sustainable production build-up. ~~The infrastructure improvements include~~

Continued exploration over the ~~development~~last three years has improved the understanding of the ore bodies below 22 level (750 metres) and has resulted in a ~~tramming loop, deepening~~further increase in resources below 750 meters. Progress on implementing the ~~No.6 Winze and sinking a new 6-meter diameter~~ Central Shaft ~~from surface~~has been adversely affected by an increase in the incidence of power interruptions due to ~~1,080 meters. The Investment Plan is proceeding on schedule and within budget:~~ the ~~tramming loop and the sinking~~instability of the ~~No. 6 Winze were both completed slightly ahead~~incoming grid power. Due to these delays and to ensure that the completion of ~~target and work~~the equipping of the shaft does not delay the planned production build-up, the vertical shaft sinking terminated at 1,204 metres to add three new production levels below 750 metres. A fourth production level is intended to be added via a decline construction in due course. The decline is expected to allow production from below 34 level (1,110 metres) to commence in mid-2024, which is the same as if the shaft had been extended to 38 level. Further progress on the Central Shaft ~~is proceeding according to plan.~~

~~Following~~depends on the ~~completion~~continued availability of various aspects of the Investment Plan, the underground mining areas can produce and hoist up to 1,800 tonnes of ore daily using both long-hole open stoping and underhand benching extraction methods. Blanket Mine produced 50,351 ounces of gold in 2016 (~~2015:~~ ~~42,804 oz.; 2014~~: ~~41,771 oz.)~~ ~~and is expected to ramp up production to approximately 80,000 ounces of gold in 2021.~~

~~In addition to the projects that form the Investment Plan, Blanket Mine has also completed Phase 1 of the AR South decline which gives access to the AR South ore body below 750 metres.~~enough foreign exchange. The ~~AR South Decline is currently being extended to 870 metres to give early access to further mineral deposits below the 750 metre level.~~

~~The Investment Plan~~investment plan provides for a proposed investment of approximately US$ ~~17.9~~21.5 million for 2020 and US$23 million in ~~2017~~2021 and ~~a further US$ 35.2 million in the period 2018 to 2020. The Investment Plan includes a revised life of mine plan for the Blanket Mine (the “LOM Plan~~”) in terms of which it is anticipated that the production from proven and probable mineral reserves will be extracted below 750 metre Level. The Investment Plan is also expected to improve Blanket Mine’s long-term operational efficiency, flexibility and sustainability.

2022.

~~Metallurgical Process~~

In terms of the Investment Plan, the crushing and milling circuits will be expanded to handle 3,000 tonnes of ore per day by 2021. The planned throughput capacity is more than sufficient to handle the planned increases in mine production from the No. 6 Winze Project and the Investment Plan.

Average plant recovery was 93% for fiscal year 2016, compared to 93% in 2015 (2014: 93.4%). Recoveries were lower than the planned level of 93.5% due to continued difficulties with the very old oxygen plant. It is intended to replace the existing oxygen plant with a new plant or by using liquid oxygen to improve recoveries. The commissioning of a new larger cluster of cyclones over the re-grind mill should result in a more consistent product being fed into the CIL plant which should improve mixing efficiencies and help to increase recovery.

Plant throughput was adversely affected by interruptions to the ZESA power supply which was subject to numerous surges and dips in voltage that adversely affected the mine’s electrical equipment. As ZESA’s equipment is unable to maintain a reliable voltage, Blanket Mine intends to install equipment to regulate the incoming electricity supply and thereby protect its own electrical equipment.

~~Metallurgical process capital development projects completed in 2016 included:~~

·	~~the new conveyor system from the secondary crushers to the new fine ore bin was commissioned in September 2016;~~

·	the new No.8 ball mill was installed and commissioned in October 2016, increasing the milling capacity to 90 tph, which is sufficient to mill the 650,000 tonnes per annum which will be required to produce 80,000 ounces of gold per annum in 2021 in terms of the Investment Plan; and

·	~~the refurbishment of the CIL tanks.~~

~~Mine under care and maintenance~~

~~Eersteling Gold Mining Company Limited~~

~~In 2016, Caledonia reached agreement for the sale of its 100% interest in the Eersteling Gold Mining Company Limited (“EGM~~”), including the rehabilitation liability. EGM is located in South Africa and has been held on care and maintenance since 1997 and accordingly has recorded no production since then. The total agreed consideration is approximately $3.4 million payable in cash, which comprises $3.0 million of sale proceeds and a non-refundable deposit of ZAR5.0 million ($0.4m, approx). Completion of the transaction is conditional only on receipt by Caledonia of the consideration in full. At the date of issue of the Annual Report, Caledonia has received approximately $145,000 (ZAR2 million) in respect of the non-refundable deposit, of which $120,000 (ZAR 1,65 million) was included as “Other Income” in the Statement of profit or loss for the year to December 31, 2016. The purchaser is an unlisted South African entity which is currently raising capital to fund, inter alia, the consideration. Caledonia has received a non-binding letter of comfort from the financial adviser to the purchaser as to the nature and timing of the fund-raising by the purchaser, but this does not amount to an underwriting of the purchase consideration. Due to the uncertainty relating to the receipt of the consideration, the sale proceeds and the de-recognition of EGM will be recognized when received.

~~Blanket Mine Satellite Prospects~~

~~Blanket Mine has~~

Caledonia’s exploration title holdings in the form of registered mining claims in the Gwanda Greenstone Belt totalling 93 claims, including a small number under option, covering properties with a total area of about 2,500 hectares. Included within these claim areasactivities are ~~18 previously operated small gold workings which warrant further exploration, i.e. the satellite projects.~~

~~Blanket Mine’s main exploration efforts on these satellite properties were~~ focused on the ~~GG Project~~growth and ~~the Mascot Project Area which, based on past production records, were believed to have the greatest potential. Work at GG and Mascot~~development of Blanket Mine. There was ~~suspended~~no deep exploration drilling in the fourth quarter of ~~2016~~2019 as all the available drilling sites had been drilled out in accordance with the annual budget. 9,824 meters were drilled in 2019 compared to 18,551 meters in 2018. Deep level exploration drilling will re-commence after the Central Shaft and ~~resources were re-deployed at~~ the ~~Blanket Mine where it is expected there~~related development has been completed to provide access to new drilling positions.

In January 2020, Ms. Janet Hobkirk joined the Group as Group Mineral Resource Manager. Ms. Hobkirk will be ~~better returns on~~responsible for driving exploration activities both at Blanket and for any new properties that are under investigation by the ~~Investment Plan. Management performed an impairment assessment on these satellite properties as at December 31, 2016 and~~Group.

Metallurgical Process

Metallurgical plant – Blanket Mine

Average plant recovery was 93.4% for 2019, compared to 92.3% in 2018 (2017: 93.4%).

Recoveries improved following the ~~assessment indicated that the recoverable amount exceeded the carrying amount. (Refer to note 13~~commissioning of the ~~Consolidated Financial Statements for assumptions used).~~

new oxygen plant in October 2019. A full assessment of the effect of the new oxygen plant can only be made after the introduction of an upgraded oxygen sparging system in the first quarter of 2020. The new oxygen sparging system will assist in maintaining recoveries as the tonnages increase in 2021 and thereafter. In 2019 the oxygen plant has resulted in a reduction in cyanide consumption which reduced from 0.88kg per tonne milled before the plant was commissioned to 0.79 kg per tonne milled by the end of the fourth quarter of 2019.

Safety, Health and Environment

The following safety statistics have been recorded for ~~fiscal~~the year ~~2016~~2019 and the preceding two years.

Classification
2014 2015 2016
Fatal - 1 -
Lost time injury 6 8 6
Restricted work activity 31 31 20
First aid 8 15 8
Medical aid 8 5 9

Occupational illness - - -
Total 53 60 43
Incidents 39 47 42
Near misses 9 14 22
Disability Injury Frequency Rate 0.69 0.508 0.300
Total Injury Frequency Rate 3.415 3.403 2.198
Man-hours worked (thousands) 3,201 3,532 3,975

Classification	2017	2018	2019
Fatal	2	2	-
Lost time injury	6	5	3
Restricted work activity	21	16	17
First aid	11	9	-
Medical aid	30	13	11
Occupational illness	1	-	-
Total	71	45	31
Incidents	41	33	54
Near misses	21	11	22
Disability Injury Frequency Rate	0.320	0.270	0.12
Total Injury Frequency Rate	2.94	1.71	1.2
Man-hours worked (thousands)	4,874	5,254	5,174

In 2018 a training facility (called the Nyanzvi initiative) was established at Blanket using dedicated facilities and specially trained facilitators. 120 senior supervisors participated in the Nyanzvi initiative during the fourth quarter of 2019 and the heads of departments at Blanket completed the programme in January 2020 thereby completing the training of Blanket’s entire workforce. As a result of this increased focus on safety training, there were no fatal accidents and the number of accidents reduced from 45 in 2018 to 31 in 2019. Safety training is an ongoing exercise and it will remain an area of focus for management.

The Group takes the safety of its employees very seriously and, accordingly, measures have been taken to instill adherence to prescribed safety procedures.

Exchange Controls, Social Investment and Contribution to the Zimbabwean Economy

Exchange control approvals from the RBZ and the Reserve Bank of South Africa are required on the flow of funds in and out of Zimbabwe and South Africa. The Company obtained necessary approvals from both the RBZ and the Reserve Bank of South Africa to transfer foreign currency during the fiscal year 2019.

Additionally, Blanket Mine’s investment in community and social projects which are not directly related to the operation of the mine or the welfare of Blanket Mine’s employees, the payments made to the Community Trust in terms of Blanket Mine’s ~~indigenisation,~~indigenization, and payments of royalties, taxation and other non-taxation charges to the Zimbabwe government and its agencies are set out in the table below.

Payments to the Community and the Zimbabwe Government
(US$’000’s)

Community
and Social
Investment
Payments to the
Community
Trust
Payments to
Zimbabwe
Government
Total
Year 2014 35 - 12,319 12,354
Year 2015 58 - 7,376 7,434
Year 2016 12 - 10,637 10,649

~~Investment Plan to Increase Production~~

On November 3, 2014, Caledonia announced the Investment Plan and production projections for the Blanket Mine. The objectives of the Investment Plan are to improve the underground infrastructure and logistics and allow an efficient and sustainable production build-up.

The Investment Plan includes a revised LOM Plan in terms of which it is anticipated that the approximate production from existing proven and probable mineral reserves above 750m (22 level) will be as set out below.

Approximate production from proven and probable mineral reserves above 750m (per LOM Plan)
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Tonnes milled (‘000) 430 460 430 380 230 100 50
Gold production (koz) 42 45 43 39 23 10 6

~~Based on the Preliminary Economic Analysis (“PEA~~”), additional approximate production from the inferred mineral resources that existed at the date of the PEA (excluding the projected production set out above) may be achieved in the following indicative ranges:

Possible production from inferred mineral resources below 750m (as per PEA)
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Tonnes milled (‘000) 0 35 160 215 390 550 600
Gold production (koz) 0 4-5 20-22 27-30 46-50 63-67 70-75

~~Canadian regulations do not allow planned production from inferred resources to be added to those from proven and probable reserves for disclosure purposes.~~

There is no certainty that the PEA will be realised. The Technical Report, performed on December 1, 2014, was authored by Daan van Heerden, Uwe Engelmann, Dario Clemente, Johan Odendaal and Jaco Burger of Minxcon, each of whom is a qualified person who is independent of Caledonia.

~~EXPLORATION AND PROJECT DEVELOPMENT~~

~~Caledonia’s primary exploration activities are focused on the growth and development of the Blanket Mine orebodies.~~

~~Blanket Exploration~~

Exploration and evaluation activities on Blanket Mine are targeting the depth extensions of all the known Blanket Mine ore bodies, viz. Blanket 1 Ore Body, Blanket 2 Ore Body, Blanket 4 Ore Body, Blanket Quartz Reef, AR Main, AR South, Eroica and Lima sections. This involves drilling downholes from chambers on 18 and 22 Levels to intersect the depth continuation of these ore bodies.

Drilling continued in 2016 with 22,172 metres drilled in the year compared to 14,330 metres in 2015. The increase in metres drilled was due to the purchase and commissioning of new drill machines in the first six months of 2016.

Drilling during 2016 was targeted at Blanket, AR Main and Eroica. Drilling at Blanket and AR Main was focussed on infill drilling with the objective of increasing the confidence level of the existing inferred resources at the Blanket and AR Main orebodies. Drilling at Eroica was more exploratory and targeted the depth extension of the Eroica southern shoot below 22 level.

The focus of the deep drilling programme in 2017 will move to AR South where only limited drilling below 22 level has been carried out to date. The geometry of the orebody with an East-West limb and a North-South limb necessitates the development of two sets of drilling infrastructure from which to drill and evaluate the depth extensions of the two limbs. With the completion of the first two drill chambers in the first quarter of 2017, drilling will take place simultaneously from these two sites targeting both limbs of AR South to a depth of 900 metres below surface. Development of an additional two chambers to extend coverage to 1000 metres depth will be completed in the second quarter of 2017.

Drilling at Blanket orebody will continue and be focussed mainly on the southern extension of Blanket 4 Ore Body where there remains potential to add to the current resources significantly. Drilling at AR Main will continue and be focussed on the southern extension of the orebody where mineralisation remains open at depth and on strike.

A surface drilling programme is underway to investigate the potential of “near mine” targets with the aim of scoping out new resources within easy reach of Blanket Mine plant. Initial drilling has been carried out along the northern strike of Lima, at Old Lima and Smiler. Drilling in the first quarter of 2017 will be focussed on Sabiwa and Jean prospects which are located between Blanket and neighbouring Vubachikwe Mine to the south.

Payments to the Community and the Zimbabwe Government ($’000’s)
	Community and Social Investment	Payments to Zimbabwe Government	Total
Year 2017	5	11,988	11,993
Year 2018	4	10,140	10,144
Year 2019	47	10,357	10,404

General Comments

Caledonia’s activities are centered on ~~Zimbabwe.~~Zimbabwe and occur year-round. Caledonia is not dependent, to any material extent, on patents, licenses, contracts, specialized equipment or new manufacturing processes at this time. However, there may be occasions that Caledonia may wish to adopt such patents, licenses, specialized equipment, etc. if these are economically beneficial to its operations. All mining and exploration activities are conducted under the various economic, mining and environmental regulations of the country where the operations are being carried out. It is always Caledonia’s standard that these regulations are complied with by Blanket Mine.

Caledonia has not experienced a shortage of availability of raw materials or significant price volatility.

Investors should recognize that Blanket’s ability to implement its investment programme and Caledonia’s ability to sustain its operations outside Zimbabwe and pay future dividends depends, inter alia, on the ability to externalise cash from Zimbabwe.

Organizational Structure

The Company has the following ~~subsidiaries, all of which are wholly-owned by the Company, (unless otherwise indicated) and whose assets or revenues exceed 10% of the consolidated assets or revenues of the Company:~~organizational structure as at March 30, 2020:

~~Subsidiaries of the Company~~	~~Country of Incorporation~~	~~Percentage held by Company~~
~~Caledonia Mining South Africa Proprietary Limited~~	~~South Africa~~	⁽¹⁾~~100~~
~~Blanket Mine (1983) (Private) Limited~~⁽²⁾	~~Zimbabwe~~	49

⁽¹⁾~~During 2016 Caledonia Mining South Africa Proprietary Limited was sold to a wholly owned subsidiary of Caledonia named Greenstone Management Services Holdings Limited (United Kingdom) (“GMS UK”).~~

⁽²⁾ ~~Blanket Mine (1983) (Private) Limited does not have any subsidiary companies.~~

D.	Property, Plant and Equipment

~~(a)South Africa:~~

EGM is owned by the Company through its ownership of 100% of the equity shares. It has been under care and maintenance since September 1997. Due to the lengthy period of care and maintenance at EGM there has been some deterioration in the facilities which will require rehabilitation work before operations could be recommenced. The underground workings at EGM were allowed to flood and will require dewatering before mining access can be resumed. The Company has no plans to expend further amounts on plant or equipment or to in any way expand or improve the facilities.

~~(b)Zimbabwe:~~

(a)

Zimbabwe:

The Company indirectly owns ~~49%~~64% of the shares of Blanket ~~Mine. It~~Mine after the purchase of Fremiro’s 15% shareholding became effective in January of 2020. The Blanket Mine is a fully equipped ~~mine~~ with all of the necessary plant and equipment to conduct mining operations and the production of gold from the ore mined from the mine.

For a detailed breakdown of the property, plant and equipment and encumbrances thereon refer to note 1318 of the Consolidated Financial Statements. The property, plant and equipment of ~~Caledonia~~the Group is predominantly held in ~~Zimbabwe. The~~Zimbabwe and the continued implementation of the ~~Investment Plan~~investment plan is expected to increase the property, plant and equipment of ~~Caledonia.~~the Group. The ~~Investment Plan~~investment plan is expected to be funded with existing cash, a term loan, ~~and~~ an overdraft facility ~~as well as~~and cash generated from operating activities. The ~~project~~investment plan is expected to be completed in 2021.

(b)

South Africa:

Refer to Item 4.A “History and Development of the Company” concerning the sale of Eersteling.

Mining Geology and Exploration Activities

Geology and Mineral Deposit

Zimbabwe’s known gold mineralisation occurs in host rocks of the Zimbabwe Craton, which is made up of Archaean rocks. The geology of the Craton is characterised by deformed and metamorphosed rocks which include high-grade metamorphic rocks, gneisses, older granitoids, greenstone belts, intrusive complexes, younger granites and the Great Dyke. The Chingezi gneiss, Mashaba tonalite and Shabani gneiss form part of a variety of tonalities and gneisses of varying ages. Three major sequences of slightly younger gold-bearing greenstone belt supracrustal rocks exist:

Older greenstones called the Sebakwian Group, which are mostly metamorphosed to amphibolite facies. They comprise komatiitic and basaltic volcanic rocks, some banded iron formation (“BIF”), as well as clastic sediments.

The Lower Bulawayan Group, which comprises basalts, high-Mg basalts, felsic volcanic rocks and mixed chemical and clastic sediments. The Lower Bulawayan Group forms the Belingwe (Mberengwa) greenstones.

The Upper Bulawayan (upper greenstones) and Shamvaian groups, which comprise a succession of sedimentary and komatiitic to tholeiitic to calc-alkaline rocks.

Three metamorphic belts surround the Zimbabwe Craton:

Archaean Limpopo Mobile Belt to the south;

Magondi Mobile Belt on the north-western margin of the Craton; and

Zambezi Mobile Belt to the north and northeast of the Zimbabwe Craton.


	Zimbabwe Craton Relative to Other Cratons

Overview of the Project Geology

The Blanket Mine is situated on the north-western limb of the Archaean Gwanda Greenstone Belt. Several other gold deposits are situated along the same general strike as the mine. Approximately 268 mines operated in this greenstone belt at one stage; however, the Blanket Mine is one of the few remaining operational mines. At Blanket Mine, the rock units strike north−south, and generally dip steeply to the west.

Local Property Geology

The local geology consists of the Felsic Unit made up of, largely, quartz and quartz-sericite schists overlain by the Mafic Unit. The lower zone of the Mafic Unit comprises ultramafics and banded iron formations which host the orebodies of the Vubachikwe mine, that is located south of Blanket. The upper zone of the Mafic Unit is made up of massive to pillowed basaltic lavas with intercalations of interflow sediments now showing as cherty argillites (locally commonly referred to as Black Markers) and this hosts the Blanket complex orebodies. The Blanket orebodies are in an orogenic setting with hydrothermal mineralization hosted in selected shears of country basaltic metavolcanics. This package is intruded by a younger and seemingly barren olivine-gabbro sheet. The sequence is capped by an Intermediate Unit comprising andesitic lavas with amphibole feldspar schists.

The Blanket complex orebodies together with those of the Vubachikwe complex comprise the north-western Mining Camp, also called the Sabiwa group of mines. Blanket Mine complex is a cluster of deposits that extend from Jethro in the south, through Blanket, Feudal, AR South, AR Main, Sheet, Eroica and Lima to the north.

Longitudinal Section of Blanket Mine


	Blanket Mine Longitudinal Section Showing Production Areas

Dormant old workings include Sabiwa, Jean, Provost, Redwick, Old Lima, and Smiler. The latter group of mines form the northern continuation of the Vubachikwe zone and are hosted by BIFs. The mafic unit which hosts the gold mineralisation is, for the most part, a metabasalt with occasional remnants of pillow basalts. Regionally, the rock is a fine-grained massive amphibolite with localised shear planes. A low angle transgressive anastomosing shear zone (up to 500 m wide cutting through the mafic zone) is the locus of the gold ore shoots. The shear zone is characterised by a well-developed fabric and the presence of biotite. A regional dolerite sill cuts the entire sequence from Vubachikwe through Blanket to Smiler. The sill does not cause a significant displacement and although it truncates the ore shoots, there is continuity of mineralisation below the sill. The upper zone comprises massive to pillowed lavas with intercalations of interflow sediments.


	Geology of the Project Area

The gold deposits are found around a low-angle transgressive shear zone. A simplified stratigraphic column for the Blanket Mine is shown in the following figure.

Stratigraphic Column


	Stratigraphic Column

Status of Exploration

The Blanket Mine is a producing operation. Exploration activities are carried out both on and off the mine. Mine exploration takes place mostly underground on the producing claims and is aimed at expanding the lateral and depth extension of the known ore bodies which are being mined, as well as searching for potential additional orebodies. Near-mine exploration takes place on satellite properties that are currently non-producing assets, which have the potential to yield new sources of ore and possibly give rise to new mines.

The mine’s exploration title holdings are in the form of 358 registered mining claims and a 2,120 ha mining lease (registered number 40) in the Gwanda Greenstone Belt. These claims include a small number under option and cover an area of approximately 3,500 ha.

The blocks of claims pegged as follows:

348 are registered as precious metal (gold) blocks covering 2,818ha.; and

10 claims were pegged and are registered as base metal (Cu, Ni, As) blocks, covering an area of 721 ha.

9,824 metres were drilled in the year compared to 18,651 in 2018 and 24,930 metres in 2017. Drilling during 2019 was targeted at Blanket section, AR South (North-South and East-West Limbs) and Eroica between 22 (750 metres) and 34 (1,110 metres) levels. The reduction in drilling metres in 2019 was in line with budget and directly related to the availability of drilling platforms. Exploration drilling will ramp up in relation to the Central Shaft equipping and the related development completion which will provide access to new drilling platforms.

Mineral Reserve Calculations

Mineral reserve estimates in this Annual Report are reported in accordance with the requirements of IG 7. Accordingly, as of the date of the Annual Report, all minerals reserves are planned to be mined out under the life of mine plan within the period of our existing rights to mine, or within the time period of assured renewal periods of our rights to mine. In addition, as of the date of this Annual Report, all mineral reserves are covered by required permits and governmental approvals.

Blanket Mine’s mineral reserve estimates are set out in the table below.

Mineral Reserve Classification	Stope Grade	Stope Tonnes	Gold Content
Mineral Reserve Classification	g/t	kt	kg	ounces
Proven	3.33	1,213	4,043	130,001
Probable	3.40	3,591	12,215	392,722
Total	3.38	4,804	16,259	522,723

Notes:

	1.	Tonnages refer to tonnes delivered to the metallurgical plant.
	2.	All figures are in metric tonnes.
	3.	Pay limit Blanket Mine 2.10 g/t.
	4.	Pay Limit calculated: USD/oz. = 1,240; Direct Cash Cost (C1) = USD71 /t milled.
	5.	Tonnage and grade have been rounded and this may result in minor adding discrepancies.

The mineral reserves information is from Blanket’s current life-of-mine plan, using an internal reserve update as at August 31, 2017. Refer to our technical report dated February 13, 2018 entitled “National Instrument 43-101 Technical Report on the Blanket Mine, Gwanda Area, Zimbabwe (Updated February 2018), a copy of which was filed by the Company on SEDAR on March 2, 2018 for key assumptions, parameters, and methods used to estimate the mineral reserves and risks that could materially affect the potential development of the mineral reserves.

Our mineral reserve figures are estimates, which may not reflect actual reserves or future production. These figures are prepared in accordance with industry practice, converting mineral deposits to reserves through the preparation of a mining plan. The mineral reserve estimates contained herein inherently include a degree of uncertainty and depend to some extent on statistical inferences. Reserve estimates require revisions based on actual production experience or new information. Should we encounter mineralization or formations different from those predicted by past drilling, sampling and similar examinations, mineral reserve estimates may have to be adjusted and mining plans may have to be altered in a way that might adversely affect our operations. Moreover, if the price of gold declines, stabilizes at a price that is lower than break-even level, if our production costs increase or recovery rates decrease, it may become uneconomical to recover mineral reserves with lower grades of mineralization.

Access to the Property, Power and Water Supply

Access to the Blanket Mine is by an all-weather single lane tarred road from Gwanda. Gwanda is linked by national highways to Bulawayo, Harare and the Beitbridge Border post. Earlier, Zimbabwe had good road infrastructure. However, lack of investment over the past ten to fifteen years resulted in its deterioration; substantial investment is required country-wide. The railway line connecting the Zimbabwean national network to South Africa passes through Gwanda. An airstrip for light aircraft is located 5 km to the northwest of the town. Blanket power is supplied primarily from ZESA. Blanket also has a combined 18MW of installed stand-by diesel generating capacity which is sufficient to allow all mining and processing activities and shaft-sinking work at the Central Shaft to continue if there are any interruptions to the ZESA supply. Water to the mine and its township is supplied through the Mtshabezi river, on-mine boreholes and the Gwanda municipality.

Caledonia’s approach to the electricity situation is threefold:

continue to engage constructively with ZESA with the objective of securing cheap, reliable and stable power from the grid. This includes agreeing a realistic electricity pricing formula in the context of the current monetary conditions; assisting ZESA to repair and maintain its equipment and participating in an industry-wide scheme to import power. On August 9, 2019 Blanket signed a new power supply agreement in terms of which Blanket will receive uninterrupted power in return for a US Dollar-denominated tariff which, although cheaper than the tariff which prevailed until December 31, 2018, is still sufficient to allow ZESA to import power so that (subject to the availability of power in neighboring countries) it can keep its supply commitment to the participants in the scheme. This arrangement has worked reasonably well, although Blanket continues to experience less severe outages during periods when South Africa’s electricity system has come under pressure;

ii.

increase Blanket’s standby diesel generating capacity. Blanket commissioned a further 6MW of diesel generators in the fourth quarter of 2019 and it now has 18MW of installed diesel generators which is enough to maintain production and allow work to continue on the Central Shaft. However, diesel generators are not a long-term solution to the electricity problem: diesel power is expensive and requires large quantities of diesel which is environmentally damaging and is not always easily available; and

iii.

explore the installation of a solar power plant to supply some or all of Blanket’s requirements. Management is currently completing financial and technical evaluations of a solar project and has received a generating license so that it can move quickly if the evaluations indicate that a solar project will be cost-effective. Caledonia ran a tender process during late 2019 to identify a party either to build the solar plant for Caledonia or to own and operate the solar plant and sell the power to Blanket. Caledonia and its advisers are currently evaluating the proposals it has received from interested parties and is considering various funding options.

Blanket Claims

Blanket Mine's exploration interests in Zimbabwe include operating claims (i.e. on-mine), non-operating claims and a portfolio of brownfield exploration projects ("Satellite Prospects").

Blanket Mine operates under a mining lease with registered number 40 issued under the Mines and Minerals Act of 1961 (Chapter 21:05). A copy is exhibited at Exhibit 4.9.

The mine’s claims under the lease cover an area of 2,120 hectares, and include Lima, Sheet, Oqueil, Feudal, Sabiwa, Jethro, Harvard and Blanket claims..

Blanket Mine also has a number of registered claims, not incorporated under the lease, which include Oqueil, Valentine, Sheet, Mbudzane, Mascot, Vulture, Abercorn, Rubicon and others.

Prior Ownership and Ownership Changes – Blanket Mine

The Blanket Mine is part of the Sabiwa group of mines within the Gwanda Greenstone Belt from which gold was first extracted in the 19^th century. The Blanket Mine is a cluster of mines extending some 3 km from Jethro in the south through Blanket itself, Feudal, AR South, AR Main, Sheet, and Eroica, to Lima in the north. Blanket Mine has produced over a million ounces of gold during its lifetime.

Following sporadic artisanal working, the Blanket Mine was acquired in 1904 by the Matabele Reefs and Estate Company. Mining and metallurgical operations commenced in 1906 and between then and 1911, 128,000 t were mined. From 1912 to 1916 mining was conducted by the Forbes Rhodesia Syndicate who achieved 23,000 t. There are no reliable records of mining for the period between 1917 and 1941 and it is possible that operations were adversely affected by political instability during World Wars I and II. In 1941 F.D.A. Payne produced some 214,000 t before selling the property to Falconbridge in 1964 (Blanket Mine, 2009). Under Falconbridge, production increased to 45 kg per month and the property yielded some 4 Mt of ore up until September 1993. Kinross Gold Corporation (“Kinross”) then took over the property and constructed a larger Carbon-in-Leach (“CIL”) plant with a capacity of 3,800 tpd. This was designed to treat both run of mine (“RoM”) ore and an old tailings dump.

The Blanket Mine is currently 64% indirectly owned and operated by Caledonia, which initially completed the purchase of the mine from Kinross on 1 April 2006. The Blanket Mine re-started production in April 2009 after a temporary shut-down due to the economic difficulties in Zimbabwe.

ITEM 4A - UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Not applicable.

ITEM 5- OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS

The following Operating and Financial Review and Prospects section is intended to help the reader understand the factors that have affected the Company's financial condition and results of operations for the historical period covered by the financial statements and management's assessment of factors and trends which are anticipated to have a material effect on the Company's financial condition and results in future periods. This section is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with, our Consolidated Financial Statements and the other financial information contained elsewhere in this document. Our financial statements have been prepared in accordance with IFRS. Our discussion contains ~~forward looking~~forward-looking information based on current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties, such as our plans, objectives and intentions. Our actual results may differ from those indicated in such ~~forward looking~~forward-looking statements.

Operating Results

The ~~principal uncertainties and variables facing our business and, therefore, the~~ key drivers of our operating results and principal activities are:

·•

revenue, which is influenced ~~by;~~by:

the price of gold, which fluctuates in terms of the ~~realised~~realized USD gold price obtained; and

our production tonnages and gold content thereof, impacting on the amount of gold we produce at our operation;

·•

our cost of producing gold;

·	~~capital expenditure;~~ and

·•

other significant matters affecting profitability.

Revenue

Revenue increased to ~~$61,992,000~~$75,826,000 in fiscal year ~~2016~~2019 from ~~$48,977,000~~$68,399,000 in fiscal year ~~2015 (2014: $53,513,000)~~2018 (2017: $69,762,000). Gold produced was 55,182 oz. (2018: 54,511 oz.; 2017: 56,133 oz.) although the amount sold during 2019 was slightly less than in 2018 (see below). The increase in revenue was principally due to an increase in the average ~~realised~~realized gold price received ~~of $1,232~~to $1,382 per oz. ~~(2015: $1,139~~(2018: $1,245 per oz.; ~~2014; $1,245~~2017; $1,243 per oz.) ~~and~~.

Gold price

Average realized gold price per ounce is a non-IFRS measures which management believes assists the stakeholders in understanding the average price obtained for an ~~increase in the sale~~ounce of ~~gold produced of 50,351 oz. (2015: 42,943 oz.; 2014: 42,927 oz.).~~

~~Gold price~~

gold.

Our revenues are derived from the sale of gold produced by the Blanket Mine. As a result, our revenues are directly influenced by the average realized ~~average~~ gold price obtained from the sale of gold. The gold prices obtained may fluctuate widely and are influenced by factors beyond the control of the Company. The table below indicates the average realized gold price per ounce obtained for the ~~2016, 2015~~2019, 2018 and ~~2014~~2017 fiscal years.

$’000
2014
2015 2016
Revenue (IFRS) 53,513 48,977 61,992
Revenue from silver sales (61) (48) (62)
Revenue from gold sales 53,452 48,929 61,930
Gold ounces sold 42,927 42,943 50,269
Average realized gold price per ounce 1,245 1,139 1,232

$’000	2017		2018		2019
Revenue (IFRS)	69,762		68,399		75,826
Revenue from silver sales	(74	)	(61	)	(64	)
Revenue from gold sales	69,688		68,338		75,762
Gold ounces sold	56,059		54,899		54,801
Average realized gold price per ounce	1,243		1,245		1,382

Gold produced

Tonnes milled, average grades, recoveries and gold produced are shown in the table below.

Blanket Mine Production Statistics
Year
Tonnes Milled
(t)
Gold Head (Feed) Grade (g/t Au)
Gold Recovery
(%)
Gold Produced
(oz.)
Quarter 1 2014 92,846 3.67 93.6 10,241
Quarter 2 2014 99,229 3.74 94.1 11,223
Quarter 3 2014 98,575 3.34 93.4 9,890
Quarter 4 2014 100,085 3.47 93.2 10,417
Year 2014 390,735 3.55 93.4 41,771
Quarter 1 2015 104,755 3.19 92.7 9,960
Quarter 2 2015 103,551 3.35 93.3 10,401
Quarter 3 2015 116,694 3.14 92.7 10,927
Quarter 4 2015 115,079 3.34 93.1 11,515
Year 2015 440,079 3.25 93.0 42,804
Quarter 1 2016 114,527 3.16 93.0 10,822
Quarter 2 2016 120,590 3.47 93.1 12,510
Quarter 3 2016 133,375 3.36 93.2 13,428
Quarter 4 2016 142,169 3.21 92.8 13,591
Year 2016 510,661 3.30 93.0 50,351
January 2017 36,896 3.44 93.7 3,899
February 2017 39,411 3.46 93.7 4,114

Blanket Mine Production Statistics
	Year	Tonnes Milled (t)	Gold Head (Feed) Grade (g/t Au)	Gold Recovery (%)	Gold Produced (oz.)
Quarter 1	2017	124,225	3.42	93.7	12,794
Quarter 2	2017	136,163	3.08	92.8	12,518
Quarter 3	2017	136,064	3.52	93.6	14,396
Quarter 4	2017	150,755	3.62	93.6	16,425
Year	2017	547,207	3.41	93.4	56,133
Quarter 1	2018	123,628	3.48	93.4	12,924
Quarter 2	2018	132,585	3.19	92.8	12,657
Quarter 3	2018	151,160	3.12	92.6	13,978
Quarter 4	2018	153,540	3.27	92.8	14,952
Year	2018	560,913	3.26	92.9	54,511
Quarter 1	2019	122,389	3.26	93.4	11,948
Quarter 2	2019	136,262	3.11	93.2	12,712
Quarter 3	2019	142,706	3.19	93.2	13,646
Quarter 4	2019	155,389	3.61	93.8	16,876
Year	2019	556,746	3.26	93.4	55,182

~~Gold~~

Ounces produced increased by 1% mostly due to the increased recovery that improved as a result of the oxygen plant compared to 2018. Tonnes milled in the year were 0.8% lower than 2018. Mine production in the ~~year~~first part of 2019 was adversely affected by Zimbabwe’s economic difficulties and technical problems: mine production was lower than planned due to mining dilution, low employee morale because of Zimbabwe’s deteriorating economic climate and delays in procuring equipment and consumables because of the shortage of foreign exchange. Production in July and early August was hampered by sustained interruptions to the electricity supply and sporadic shortages of diesel.

The second half of 2019 saw a substantial improvement in production due to the following factors:

a new ~~record~~electricity tariff resulted in a cheaper and more reliable supply of imported electricity;

workers’ remuneration was revised so that they are better protected from inflation;

a revised bonus structure was implemented to incentivize individual teams;

new controls were introduced to minimize mining dilution and increase transparency in the daily targets for production ~~from underground, surpassing~~teams;

on-mine supervision was strengthened; and

underhand stoping in narrow reef areas was re-introduced to reduce dilution with improved support in certain areas so that safety is not compromised.

Blanket’s improved operating performance resulted in a record level of production in the ~~previous record~~last quarter of ~~42,804 oz.~~2019 which, ~~was~~in conjunction with a stronger gold price, resulted in a substantial improvement in gross profit. The strong operational performance achieved ~~in 2015.~~

has continued into 2020 and gives grounds for confidence for future performance.

Production cost

Production ~~costs include~~cost includes salaries and wages, on mine administration, consumable materials and electricity and other related costs incurred in the production of gold. ~~Salaries~~Production cost for 2019, 2018 and ~~wages, consumable materials and electricity, are the largest components of production cost. Production costs for 2016, 2015 and 2014 are summarised~~2017 is summarized below.

$ ‘000 2014 2015 2016
Salaries and wages 10,014 11,908 12,206
Consumable materials 14,565 14,479 16,291
Site restoration 29 - 32
Exploration cost not capitalised 343 380 408
Safety 473 551 221
On mine administration 2,484 2,701 2,898
Other - - 30
Total 27,908 30,019 32,086

~~On mine~~

$ ‘000	2017		2018		2019
Salaries and wages		13,440		13,160		13,905
Cash-settled share-based payments (note 27.1 (a))		311		43		107
Consumable materials		9,916		12,143		13,020
Electricity costs		8,701		9,313		6,383
Site restoration		58		84		-
Pre-feasibility exploration cost		410		411		301
Safety		323		592		525
On mine administration		3,004		3,616		2,159
Other production cost		17		-		-
		36,180		39,315		36,400

On-mine cost, ~~all in~~all-in sustaining cost (“AISC”) and ~~all in~~all-in cost per ounce

On-mine cost, AISC and all-in cost per ounce are non-IFRS cost measures which managements believes assist the stakeholders in understanding the cost structures of the Company. The table below reconciles production cost as stated in terms of IFRS to these cost measures.

A narrow focus on the direct costs of production (mainly labour, electricity and consumables) does not fully reflect the total cost of gold production. Accordingly, cost per ounce data for the fiscal year and ~~the comparative~~previous fiscal years ~~have~~has been prepared in accordance with the Guidance Note issued by the World Gold Council on June 23, 2013 and ~~these Non-IFRS Measures are~~is set out in the table below on the following bases:

On-mine cost per ounce, which shows the on-mine costs of producing an ounce of gold and includes direct labour, electricity, consumables and other costs that are incurred at the mine including insurance, security and on-mine administration;

ii.

All-in sustaining cost (“AISC”) per ounce, which shows the on-mine cost per ounce plusroyalty paid, ~~share-based payment expenses,~~ additional costs incurred outside the mine (i.e. at offices in Harare, Johannesburg, London and ~~St. Helier)~~Jersey), costs associated with maintaining the operating infrastructure and ~~resource~~reserve base that are required to maintain production at the current levels (sustaining capital investment), the share-based expense arising from unit awards under the Company’s 2015 Omnibus Equity Incentive Compensation Plan (the “LTIPs”) less silver by-product ~~revenue;~~revenue and the ECI; and

iii.

All-in cost per ounce, which shows ~~the all-in sustaining cost~~AISC per ounce plus the additional costs associated with activities that are undertaken ~~with a view~~ to ~~increasing~~increase production (expansion capital investment).

($’000’s unless otherwise indicated) 12 Months to December 31
2014 2015 2016
Production cost (IFRS) 27,908 30,019 32,086
Less site restoration costs (29 ) - (32 )
Less exploration cost (343 ) (380 ) (408 )
Less safety costs (473 ) (551 ) (221 )
Other cost 906 1,011 535
On-mine production cost 27,979 30,099 31,960

Gold sales (oz.) 42,927 42,943 50,269
On-mine cost per ounce ($/oz.) 652 701 636

Royalty 3,521 2,455 2,923
Export incentive - - (1,104 )
Exploration, remediation and permitting cost 305 399 311
Sustaining capital development 2,348 4,707 3,792
Administrative expenses 7,387 7,622 7,263
Less Zambian expenses (896 ) (716 ) (17 )
Silver by-product credit (61 ) (48 ) (62 )
Share-based payment expense - 24 788
Other 54 (2 )
All in sustaining cost 40,637 44,540 45,854

Gold sales (oz.) 42,927 42,943 50,269
All in sustaining cost per ounce ($/oz.) 947 1,037 912

Permitting and exploration expenses 161 138 182
Non-sustaining capital expenses 3,833 13,486 15,367
Total all in cost 44,631 58,164 61,402

Gold sales (oz.) 42,927 42,943 50,269
All in cost per ounce ($/oz.) 1,040 1,354 1,221

~~The all-in sustaining~~

($’000’s unless otherwise indicated)
	2017		2018		2019
Production cost (IFRS)	36,180		39,315		36,400
Less exploration and site restoration costs	(933	)	(1,003	)	(826	)
Cash-settled share-based payment expense - allocated to production cost	(311	)	(43	)	(107	)
Other cost	563		(395	)	212
On-mine production cost	35,499		37,874		35,679

Gold sales (oz.)	56,059		54,899		54,801
On-mine cost per ounce ($/oz.)	633		690		651

Royalty	3,498		3,426		3,854
ECI	(2,446	)	(6,482	)	(1,930	)
Exploration, remediation and permitting cost	316		305		416
Sustaining capital development	3,509		2,154		565
Administrative expenses	5,911		6,465		5,637
Silver by-product credit	(74	)	(61	)	(64	)
Cash-settled share-based payment expense	976		315		689
Cash-settled share-based payments expense - allocated to production cost	311		43		107
All in sustaining cost	47,500		44,039		44,953

Gold sales (oz.)	56,059		54,899		54,801
AISC per ounce ($/oz.)	847		802		820

Permitting and exploration expenses	183		132		132
Non-sustaining capital expenses	17,441		17,760		20,030
Total all in cost	65,124		61,719		65,115

Gold sales (oz.)	56,059		54,899		54,801
All in cost per ounce ($/oz.)	1,162		1,124		1,188

On-Mine costs ~~incurred in 2015 and 2014 have been re-stated to include share-based payment expenses and the by-product credits arising on the sale of silver. The change is not material.~~

~~Per-ounce costs are calculated on the basis of sales and not production, so that an accurate value can be ascribed to the royalty.~~

On-mine cost ~~per ounce decreased from the comparative years due to the increase in gold ounces sold. On-mine costs comprise~~comprises labour, electricity, consumables and other costs ~~which include~~such as security and insurance. ~~Blanket Mine did not experience significant inflationary pressure on input costs.~~

~~All-in sustaining cost per ounce comprises on-mine~~Production costs and also includes royalty payments, the export incentive, group administrative costs, sustaining capital investment, share based payment expenses and, by-product expenses. The all-in sustaining cost decreasedare detailed in ~~the year compared~~note 9 to the ~~comparative years due to lower~~Consolidated Financial Statements. The on-mine cost per ounce of gold sold decreased compared to the ~~reduced royalty~~2018 due to the higher grade and higher recovery and lower costs of electricity and other costs, the combined effect of which was offset somewhat by higher labour and consumable costs.

The grade improved throughout 2019. A higher grade increases the ounces produced and reduces the on-mine cost per ounce which is generally related to tonnes of production – if each tonne mined and processed contains more gold, a higher grade will result in a lower cost per ounce even if costs remain unchanged.

Labour costs in 2019 were higher than previous years due to production bonuses paid out in the latter part of 2019 and additional staff recruitment required to enable the planned production increase in 2021.

Consumable costs for 2019 were higher than in the comparable years due to the ~~effect~~increased cost of maintaining the ~~export incentive credit~~underground trackless equipment; consumable costs for ~~incremental production which was recognised in the 2016 year, lower general and administrative costs per ounce and lower sustaining capital expenditure per ounce.~~

~~Investment in expansion projects in the year was $15,4 million compared to $13,5 million in 2015 and $3,8 million in 2014,~~2019 also increased due to the ~~continued high levels of investment in terms~~increased consumption rate for cyanide before the commissioning of the ~~Investment Plan.~~

~~Capital expenditure (Cash)~~

~~Total cash capital expenditure increased to $19,885,000 (2015: $16,567,000; 2014: $6,150,000)~~new oxygen plant in October 2019.

The electricity cost in 2019 was lower due to the implementation of the ~~Investment plan. Significant projects on~~new power supply arrangements from mid-August. The lower cost for 2019 was also the result of the low US-Dollar denominated cost of power arising in the first half of 2019 when the cost of Blanket’s grid power was denominated in local currency which ~~capital expenditures were incurred in 2016 included:~~

depreciated substantially against the US Dollar.

·	~~Central shaft~~

·	~~Fine ore bin~~

·	~~Ball mill No. 8~~

·	~~Decline 1&2~~

·	~~Deep drilling~~

·	~~Sustaining capital expenditure~~

~~Capital projects~~

Other costs comprise a small component of on-mine costs; these costs were reduced in 2019 as they are largely denominated in local currency which depreciated substantially against the US Dollar.

All-in sustaining costs

All-in sustaining costs for the previous year and ~~expenditures~~for the comparable quarter were reduced by $4.5 million and $1.8 million respectively due to other income received in terms of the ECI and gold support price. On a cost per ounce basis, the benefit of these were $118 per ounce for 2018 and $126 per ounce for the comparable quarter. After adjusting prior periods for the benefits arising from these, all-in sustaining costs for 2019 were approximately 10% lower than the previous year. The reduction is due to lower on-mine costs as discussed above, lower administrative expenses and lower sustaining capital expenditure. Administrative expenses which are ~~further analysed~~detailed in ~~item 4 “Mining operations” and “Metallurgical processes” and~~ note 13 ofto the Consolidated Financial ~~Statements.~~

Statements were reduced due to inter alia lower expenditure on investor relations, listing fees and reduced costs associated with Eersteling following its sale.

All-in costs

All-in costs include investment in expansion projects which remained at a high level due to the continued investment at Blanket.

Other significant matters affecting profitability

~~Administrative expenses~~

~~Administrative expenses decreased~~

Foreign exchange gains

On October 1, 2018 the RBZ issued a directive to Zimbabwean banks to separate foreign currency from RTGS$ on the accounts held by ~~5% from~~their clients and pegged the ~~previous year, due~~RTGS$ at 1:1 to the ~~reduction in cost from~~US Dollar. On February 20, 2019 the ~~closure of~~RBZ issued a further monetary policy statement, which allowed inter-bank trading between RTGS$ and foreign currency. The interbank rate was introduced at 2.5 RTGS$ to 1 US Dollar and traded at 16.77 RTGS$ to 1 US Dollar as at December 31, 2019. On June 24, 2019 the Zambian operations partly offset by professional consulting fees associated with the evaluation of potential investment opportunities and, legal costs relating to Caledonia’s general corporate affairs including regulatory and tax compliance in all relevant jurisdictions. Administrative expenses are further analysed in note 10 of the Consolidated Financial Statements.

~~Sale of treasury bills~~

~~On May 16, 2016 Blanket Mine sold treasury bills (“Bills”)~~Government issued ~~by the~~ S.I. 142 which stated “Zimbabwe ~~government for~~ ~~a total consideration of $3,203,000. The Bills were issued to Blanket in 2015 and replaced the Special Tradeable Gold Bonds (“Bonds”~~dollar (RTGS$) which were issued to Blanket in 2009 as part consideration for gold sales that were made by Blanket in 2008 under the terms of the sales mechanism that existed at that time for Zimbabwean gold producers. The proceeds from the Bills were subject to Zimbabwean income tax at 25.75% during 2016. The sale of the Bills is a once off item and is not expected to be ~~repeated~~the sole currency for legal tender purposes for any transactions in ~~fiscal year 2017.~~

~~Export Incentive Credit~~

~~In May 2016 the RBZ announced an export incentive scheme (the “scheme~~Zimbabwe”~~) to encourage large-scale gold producers such as Blanket to increase gold production~~. Throughout these announcements and ~~thereby increase the quantity of gold available for export from Zimbabwe. In terms of the scheme, Blanket received an export incentive credit in its account with Fidelity~~ to ~~the value of 2.5% of the sale proceeds of the gold sold to Fidelity. As at~~ the date of issue of ~~this Annual Report~~the Consolidated Financial Statements the US Dollar has remained the primary currency in which the Group’s Zimbabwean entities operate and the functional currency of these entities.

Previously there was uncertainty as to what currency would be used to settle amounts owed to the Zimbabwe Government. S.I. 142 clarified the Zimbabwean Government’s intentions that these liabilities were always denominated in RTGS$ and that RTGS$ would be the currency in which they would be settled. The devaluation of the deferred tax and electricity liabilities contributed the largest portion of the foreign exchange gain set out below.

The table below illustrates the effect the weakening of the RTGS$ and other non-RTGS$ currencies had, against the US Dollar, on the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income.

	2017		2018		2019

Unrealized Foreign exchange (loss)/gain	(379	)	230		31,411
Realised foreign exchange (loss)	(1	)	(7	)	(1,750	)
Net foreign exchange (loss)/gain	(380	)	223		29,661

Sale of Eersteling

On May 31, 2018 the Group entered into an amended share sale agreement with SH Minerals to sell the shares and claims of Eersteling. The amended share sale agreement allowed for a purchase price of $3 million which would be settled by three payments of $1 million payable on the completion date, 12 and 18 months after the completion date. On January 31, 2019 all ~~export incentive credits outstanding~~suspensive conditions for the sale were met and the Group transferred the registered and beneficial ownership of Eersteling to SH Minerals. During 2019, the ZAR equivalent of $1 million was received and the ZAR equivalent of approximately $0.9 million was received post year-end as ~~at December 31, 2016 were received. The amount was recognised as Other Income in~~payment towards the ~~Statement~~next instalment of ~~Profit or Loss and Other Comprehensive Income (refer~~the purchase price with the remainder of that instalment expected to be received shortly.

Refer to note 922.1 of the Consolidated Financial ~~Statements).~~

~~In January 2017, Blanket Mine was awarded an additional export incentive credit of 1% of sale proceeds, thus the total export incentive in 2017 is expected to be 3.5% of gold proceeds.~~

~~Agreement~~Statements for the ~~Sale of EGM~~

~~In 2016 Caledonia reached agreement for~~detail on the sale of ~~its 100 % interest~~the subsidiary.

Administrative expenses

Administrative expenses decreased by 12.8% from the previous year, principally due to a decrease in investor relations and listing related fees. Administrative expenses are further analyzed in note 14 of the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Government grant – Gold sale export incentive

From May 2016 the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe announced an export credit incentive (“ECI”) on the gold proceeds received for all large scale gold mine producers. On January 1, 2018 the ECI decreased from 3.5% to 2.5% and on February 1, 2018 increased to 10%. All incentives granted by the Zimbabwean Government were included in other income when determined receivable. All receipts were received in Blanket Mine’s RTGS$ account. In the monetary policy statement issued on February 20, 2019 the RBZ announced the cancellation of the ECI.

Government grant – Gold support price

From March 6, 2019 it became apparent that Blanket Mine’s sales proceeds received from Fidelity were calculated at a gross price of $44,000 per kilogram ($1,368.58 per ounce), which exceeded the prevailing London Bullion Market Association (“LBMA”) price. On May 12, 2019 the Company received confirmation from Fidelity of this windfall receipt, called the “gold support price”, which has been implemented to incentivise gold producers to increase gold production. The gold support price has not been increased as the LBMA gold price has subsequently increased above $1,368.58 per ounce.

Greenstone Retirement Fund pay-out

The Greenstone Retirement Fund (the “Fund”) was established with the aim to provide retirement benefits to employees of mines previously owned by Caledonia Mining South Africa Proprietary Limited. A surplus remained in the ~~EGM. EGM is located~~Fund after all members were retrenched or terminated in 1997 when the mines were closed. The Financial Services Board in South Africa appointed a tribunal that liquidated the Fund and ~~has been held on care~~concluded that the surplus of ZAR 3.6 million ($250,000) that remained in the Fund be paid out to the former employer. On October 25, 2019 the surplus was paid out to Caledonia Mining South Africa Proprietary Limited.

Gold hedge

The Company entered into a 5-month hedge in respect of 4,500 ounces of gold per month from February to June 2019 through the purchase of put options with a strike price of $1,250 per ounce. The gold price never went below $1,250 per ounce and ~~maintenance since 1997 and accordingly has recorded no production since then.~~the hedge was concluded at a cost of $324,000.

The Company entered a new hedge in November 2019 at a cost of $379,000. The new hedge was in the form of put options in respect of 4,600 ounces of gold per month for the period January to June 2020 exercisable at a strike price of $1,400 per ounce. At December 31, 2019 the mark-to-market valuation, that represents the fair value of the hedge, amounted to $102,000 (2018: Nil; 2017: Nil).

Both hedges were entered into by the Company for economic hedging purposes to ensure sufficient cash availability for Blanket Mine’s capital investment plan, rather than as a speculative investment. The total ~~agreed consideration is $3.0 million payable plus a non-refundable deposit of ZAR5.0 million ($0.4 million) in cash. Completion~~expense of the transaction is conditional only on receipt by Caledonia of the consideration in full. To date, Caledonia has received consideration of approximately $145,000 (ZAR2.0 million) which is included as “Other Income” in the Statement of profit or lossderivative contracts amounted to $601,000 (2018: $360,000; 2017: Nil) for the year to December 31 2016. The purchaser is an unlisted South African entity which is currently raising capital to fund the consideration. Caledonia has received a non-binding letter of comfort from the financial adviser to the purchaser as to the nature and timing of the fund-raising by the purchaser, but this does not amount to an underwriting of the purchase consideration. Due to the uncertainty relating to the receipt of the consideration, the sale proceeds will be recognized when received.

~~Share based~~year.

Share-based payment awards ~~– Long-term incentive plan~~

Caledonia ~~has~~ established its 2015 Omnibus Equity Incentive Compensation Plan (“~~OEICP”~~OEICP”) for grants after May 2015. Share options issued before May 2015 were issued in terms of ~~the~~a rolling stock option plan, which was superseded by the OEICP. In accordance with ~~both plans,~~the previous plan, options ~~are~~were granted at an exercise price ~~equal to~~not less than the ~~market~~closing price of the shares on the TSX on the trading day prior to the grant date. Under the OEICP, options are granted on the same basis or, if greater, at not less than the ~~date~~volume-weighted average trading price of the shares on the TSX for the five trading days immediately prior to the grant date. In January 2020, the OEICP was amended to allow options and other awards made under the OEICP to be priced with reference also to the share price on the NYSE American or AIM (i.e. not just limited to the TSX). Options vest according to dates set at the discretion of the Compensation Committee ofor the Board of Directors at the date of grant. All outstanding option awards that have been granted pursuant to the plan vest immediately. All remaining options granted under the previous plan were exercised during fiscal year 2017.

~~Terms and conditions of share option programmes~~

The maximum term of the options under the OEICP is 10 years and under the rolling stock option plan was 5 years. The terms and conditions relating to the grant of options under the rolling stock option plan ~~are~~were that all options ~~are to~~would be settled by physical delivery of shares.

~~During 2016, certain~~

Certain key management members ~~were~~have been granted Restricted Share Units (“~~RSUs~~”RSUs”) and Performance ~~Share~~ Units (“~~PSUs~~”PSUs”), pursuant to ~~the~~ provisions of the ~~2015~~ OEICP. All RSUs and PSUs were granted and approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.

The RSUs will vest three years after grant date given that the service condition of the relevant employees ~~are~~is fulfilled. The value of the vested RSUs will be the ~~amount~~number of RSUs vested multiplied by the fair market value of the Company’s shares, as specified by the ~~plan,~~OEICP and in the award agreements, on date of settlement.

The PSUs have a service condition and a performance period of three years. The performance condition of the currently outstanding PSUs is a function of gold production and for PSUs that have now vested also included production cost ~~gold production~~ and central shaft depth targets on certain specified dates. The number of ~~shares~~PSUs that will vest will be the ~~PSU units~~PSUs granted multiplied by ~~the~~a performance multiplier, which will reflect the actual performance in terms of the performance ~~conditions~~condition compared to expectations on the date of the award.

RSU holders are entitled to receive dividends over the vesting period. Such dividends will be reinvested in additional RSUs at the then applicable share ~~price calculated at the average Bank of Canada noon rate immediately preceding the dividend payment.~~price. PSUs have rights to dividends only after they have vested.

RSUs and PSUs were originally granted to be settled in cash. On May 8, 2018 the Board approved amendments to the awards to allow for settlement of the vesting date value in cash or shares issuable at fair market value or a combination of both at the discretion of the unitholder.

The fair value of the RSUs, ~~were estimated to be~~at the ~~Toronto Stock Exchange (“TSX”) share price~~reporting date, was based on ~~reporting date.~~the Black Scholes option valuation model. The fair value of the PSUs, ~~were calculated as~~at the ~~TSX share price at~~ reporting date, was based on the Black Scholes option valuation model less the fair value of the expected dividends during the vesting period multiplied by the performance multiplier expectation. ~~As at December 31, 2016,~~At the reporting date it was ~~expected~~assumed that there is a ~~100%~~93%-100% probability that the performance conditions will be met and therefore a ~~100%~~93%-100% (2018: 85%; 2017: 94%) average performance multiplier was used in calculating the estimated liability.

The ~~effect~~liability as at December 31, 2019 amounted to $524,000 (December 31, 2018: $2,043). Included in the liability as at December 31, 2019 is an amount of $107,000 (December 31, 2018: $43,000; December 31, 2017: $311,000) that was expensed and classified as production costs; refer note 9. During the year PSUs and RSUs to the value of $2,243,000 vested of which $963,000 was issued as share capital.

An example award agreement for PSUs granted on January 11, 2019 as well as an addendum is disclosed as Exhibit 4.6.

On January 11, 2020 and January 19, 2020 an aggregate of 121,332 PSUs and 17,585 RSUs were awarded to executives as well as to certain senior management of the companies in the Group. An example of the award agreement is disclosed as Exhibit 4.7.

Caledonia Mining South Africa employee incentive scheme

From July 2017, Caledonia Mining South Africa Proprietary Limited granted 52,282 awards respectively to certain of its employees that entitle them to a cash pay-out at the Company’s share price on November 30 each year over a 3-year period from the grant date. The cash-settled share-based payment liability was calculated based on the ~~profitability~~number of ~~the Company is therefore influenced~~awards expected to vest multiplied by the ~~amount of RSUs and PSUs that vest and the~~Company’s Black Scholes option valuation fair value of £6.07 at the ~~share options that is based on~~reporting date and apportioned for the ~~share price of~~quantity vested over the ~~Company.~~total vesting period. The ~~share based~~liability relating to these cash-settled share-based payment ~~expense in the Statement of Profit or Loss~~awards amounted to ~~$617,792 (2015:$ Nil; 2014:$ Nil).~~

~~Gold hedge~~

~~In February 2016,~~$16,000 (December 31, 2018: $47,000) and the ~~Company entered into a hedge in respect of 15,000 ounces of gold over a period of 6 months. The hedge protected~~expense amounted to $73,000 (December 31, 2018: $97,000; December 31, 2017: $123,000) for the Company if the gold price fell below $1,050 per ounce and gave the Company full participation if the price of gold exceeded $1,079 per ounce. The derivative financial instrument was entered into by the Company for economic hedging purposes and not as a speculative investment and was closed out in August 2016.

The derivative contract resulted in a loss of $435,000 included in the Statement of Profit or Loss and Other Comprehensive Income. The Company settled the loss with the $435,000 margin call deposited at the inception of the hedge transaction.

year ended December 31,

2019.

Adjusted earnings per share

“Adjusted earnings per share” is a Non-IFRS Measure which management believes assists investors in understanding the ~~company’s~~Company’s cash-based performance of core business activities. The table below reconciles “adjusted earnings per share” to the Profit/Loss attributable to Owners of the Company shown in the Consolidated Financial Statements which have been prepared under IFRS and adjusts for deferred tax and non-core business activities.

Reconciliation of Adjusted Earnings per Share (“EPS”) to IFRS Profit Attributable to Owners of the Company
($’000’s unless otherwise indicated) 12 Months to December 31
2014 2015 2016
Profit for the year 5,946 5,590 11,085
Non-controlling interest share (“NCI”)
(1,511 ) (811 ) (2,559 )
Profit attributable to owners of the Company (IFRS) 4,435 4,779 8,526

Add back/(deduct)
IAS 19 adjustment 48 100 80
Deferred tax 706 2,567 4,611
Sale of Blanket Mine treasury bills - - (3,202 )
Other income - - (226 )
Foreign exchange (gain)/loss (1,065 ) (2,850 ) 505
Zambian expenses 896 716 17
Prior year over accrual of GMS UK tax - (871 ) -
Asset impairment 178 - -
Prior year adjustment in respect of South African tax 306 (765 ) -
South African tax and penalties - 744 -
Total before tax and NCI 5,504 4,420 10,311

Reversal of tax effect 243 660 891
NCI effect (151 ) (444 ) 111
Adjusted profit 5,596 4,636 11,284

Weighted average shares in issue (m) 52.117 52.095 52.787
Adjusted EPS (cents) 10.7 8.8 21.4

~~Zimbabwe Indigenisation Policy~~

~~Transactions that implemented~~

Reconciliation of Adjusted Earnings per Share (“Adjusted EPS”) to IFRS Profit Attributable to Owners of the Company *($’000’s unless otherwise indicated)*

	*2017			*2018			2019
Profit for the period (IFRS)		11,896			13,756		50,401
Non-controlling interest share of profit for the period		(2,512	)		(2,990	)	(8,383	)
Profit attributable to owners of the Company		9,384			10,766		42,018
Blanket Mine Employee Trust adjustment		(210	)		(280	)	(986	)
Earnings (IFRS)		9,174			10,486		41,032
Weighted average shares in issue		10,607			10,603		10,742
IFRS EPS (cents)		86			99		382

Add back/(deduct) amounts in respect of foreign exchange gains and losses:
Realised net foreign exchange losses		1			5		1,648
- less tax		-			(1	)	(414	)
- less non controlling interest		-			(1	)	(198	)
Unrealized net foreign exchange losses/(gains)		379			(230	)	(31,309	)
- less tax		(97	)		55		519
- less non controlling interest		(62	)		16		5,000
Adjusted IFRS profit excl. foreign exchange		9,395			10,330		16,278
Weighted average shares in issue		10,607			10,603		10,742
Adjusted IFRS EPS excl foreign exchange (cents)		89			97		152

Add back/(deduct) amounts in respect of:
Reversal of Blanket Mine Employee Trust adjustment		210			280		986
Deferred tax		3,696			3,607		2,460
Deferred tax net of non controlling interest		(691	)		(601	)	(477	)
Hedge loss		-			360		601
Equity-settled share-based expense		806			14		-
Profit on sale of subsidiary		-			-		(4,409	)
Adjusted profit		13,416			13,990		15,439
Weighted average shares in issue (m)		10,607			10,603		10,742
Adjusted EPS (cents)		126			132		144

*Restated period and numbers for the ~~indigenisation~~reversal of realised foreign exchange and the reversal of Blanket Mine were completed on September 5, 2012. Following completion of these transactions Caledonia now owns 49% of Blanket Mine. Caledonia has received the Certificate of Compliance from the Zimbabwe government which confirms that Blanket Mine is fully compliant with the Indigenisation and Economic Empowerment Act.

Employee Trust adjustment.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash and cash equivalents

$’000
2014 2015 2016

Bank balances 23,082 12,568 14,335
Cash and cash equivalents in the statement of financial position 23,082 12,568 14,335
Bank overdraft used for cash management purposes - (1,688) -
Cash and cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows 23,082 10,880 14,335

~~On August 23, 2016~~

$’000	2017		2018	2019
Bank balances	13,067		11,187	9,383
Cash and cash equivalents in the statements of financial position	13,067		11,187	9,383
Bank overdraft used for cash management purposes	(311	)	-	(409	)
Cash and cash equivalents in the statements of cash flows	12,756		11,187	8,893

Blanket Mine has arranged an unsecured ~~bank~~ overdraft ~~facility of $2 million that was unutilised at December 31, 2016. The overdraft facility bears interest at 6.5% per annum of~~facilities with the ~~amount outstanding, 4.65% above the base rate~~following banks and ~~has a $20,000 arrangement fee over a 12 month period with a review date of August 31, 2017. The facility is payable on demand.~~terms.

On October 19, 2016 Blanket Mine received $3 million in terms of a term facility with Barclays Bank of Zimbabwe Limited bearing interest at a nominal rate of 7,25% per annum and an upfront arrangement fee of $30,000. The term facility will be paid back over 8 quarterly instalments of $375,000 starting January 19, 2017. The term facility is secured in terms of a general notarial bond registered over the moveable assets of Blanket Mine.

Overdraft facilities	Denomination RTGS$		Interest rate
Stanbic Bank		15,000,000		25	%
First Capital Bank		10,000,000		26	%

As at year end, Caledonia’s cash was held in the following jurisdictions:

$’000 2014 2015 2016
Jersey, Channel Islands - - 2,844
United Kingdom 9,822 2,922 2,038
South Africa 10,566 3,979 690
Canada 833 5,519 150
Zimbabwe (Net of overdraft) 1,835 (1,542) 8,613
Zambia 26 2 -
Total 23,082 10,880 14,335

$’000	2017		2018		2019
Jersey, Channel Islands		4,470		1,954		1,146
United Kingdom		369		1,311		1,735
South Africa		1,619		2,931		2,513
Zimbabwe (net of overdraft)		6,298		4,991		3,499
Total		12,756		11,187		8,893

An analysis of the sources and uses of Caledonia’s cash is set out in the Consolidated ~~Statement~~Statements of Cash Flows in the Consolidated Financial Statements.

As of December 31, ~~2016,~~2019, Caledonia had a working capital surplus of ~~$15,960,000 (2015: $15,165,000; 2014: $26,771,000)~~$20,489,000 (2018: $15,970,000; 2017: $12,311,000). As of December 31, ~~2016,~~2019, Caledonia had potential liabilities for rehabilitation work on Blanket (2019 and ~~EGM -~~prior) and Eersteling in 2018 and 2017 – if and when those mines permanently close -– at an estimated present value cost of ~~$3,456,000 (2015: $2,762,000; 2014: $2,484,000)~~$3,346,000 (2018: $3,309,000; 2017: $3,797,000). The Company’s objectives when managing capital are to safeguard its ability to continue as a going concern in order to pursue its mining operations and exploration activities.

The Company’s primary objective with respect to its capital management is to ensure that it has ~~sufficient~~enough cash resources to maintain its ongoing operations, to provide returns for shareholders, complete the investment plan and accommodate any asset retirement ~~obligation and to pursue growth opportunities.~~obligation. Refer to note 2531 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for information on the type of financial instruments used and the maturity profiles thereof. Management believes that the current working capital and future production cash proceeds will be ~~sufficient~~enough to meet its capital requirements.

Caledonia paid its inaugural dividend of 5 Canadian cents per share in February 2013 following a capital re-structure which was approved by shareholders in January 2013 which allowed it to make dividend payments. The inaugural dividend did not relate to any specific accounting period. Caledonia paid a further dividend of 5 Canadian cents per share in April 2013 in respect of the earnings for the year to December 31, 2012.

On November 25, 2013 Caledonia announced a revised dividend policy pursuant to which it intended to pay a dividend of 6 Canadian cents per share in 2014, split into 4 equal quarterly payments of 1.5 Canadian cents per share. The first quarterly dividend was paid on January 31, 2014; further payments were made quarterly thereafter.

Following the announcement on December 16, 2015 that henceforth Caledonia will report its financial results in USD, the quarterly dividend that was paid at the end of January 2016 was declared and denominated in USD as 1.125 United States cents. A further quarterly dividend of 1.125 United States cents was paid at the end of April 2016.

On July 5, 2016 Caledonia announced a quarterly dividend of 1.375 United States cents per share, which was paid at the end of July 2016; further dividends of 1.375 United States Cents were paid at the end of October 2016 and January 2017. The increased dividend represents Caledonia’s revised dividend policy. It is currently envisaged that the dividend of 5.5 United States cents per annum will be maintained in 2017.

It is intended that all of the capital investment which will be required to fund the planned growth and development at Blanket Mine over the next 73 years will be funded by Blanket Mine’s internal cash flows and debt facilities.

Blanket foreign exchange approval requirements

Approval from the RBZ is required for the remittance of dividends declared from Zimbabwe, for the repayment of loans and advances from ~~subsidiary companies such as~~ Blanket Mine ~~(1983)(Private) Limited~~ to ~~Caledonia.~~ Caledonia ~~has not experienced difficulty in securing~~and the repayment of capital and consumables purchased from Caledonia Mining South Africa Proprietary Limited. During 2019 Caledonia obtained the necessary ~~approvals.~~

approvals from the RBZ to obtain foreign currency to conduct normal business operations.

Research and development, patents and ~~licences~~licenses, etc

~~Not applicable.~~

The Company is an exploration, development and mining company and does not carry on any research and development activities.

Trend Information

~~For~~

Production Guidance

Production for 2019 was 55,182 ounces, which exceeded the ~~full fiscal year 2017, we are expecting~~guidance range of 50,000 to 53,000 ounces due mainly to improved grade and recoveries. Refer to section 5A – gold produced for further discussion and detail of actual production.

Production guidance for 2020 is between 53,000 and 56,000 ounces.

Cost Guidance

The estimated on-mine cost for 2019 was in the range of $735 to $817 per ounce and the estimated AISC for 2019 was a range of $933 to $1,022 per ounce. The actual on-mine cost per ounce for 2019 was $651 and actual AISC per ounce for 2019 was $820 - lower than guidance. Costs were generally better than guidance due to higher than expected production (particularly arising from ~~our operations~~improved grade), a lower electricity cost and continued close attention to controlling costs.

On-mine cost guidance for 2020 is in the range of ~~60,000 ounces at on mine cash~~$693 to $767 per ounce; guidance for AISC is $951 to $1,033 per ounce. The guidance for on-mine cost per ounce is higher than the on-mine cost per ounce in 2019 because costs in early 2019 benefitted from a one-time reduction in the cost of ~~$600~~electricity as a result of the depreciation of the local currency. On mine costs in 2020 are also expected to ~~$630~~be higher than in 2019 due to higher maintenance costs for the underground fleet of trackless equipment which is used in the declines.

The guidance for AISC per ounce ~~(2016: $701; 2015: $652). Our~~in 2020 is higher than AISC per ounce in 2019 – the increase is largely due to the projected increase in on-mine costs and the removal of the ECI.

Earnings Guidance

Guidance for adjusted earnings per share for 2019 was in the range of 86 to 117 cents per share. This guidance was issued in the MD&A published on March 20, 2019 and reflected the Company’s production and cost guidance and assumed a gold price for 2019 of $1,300 per ounce.

On January 30, 2020 the Company issued guidance for earnings per share for 2019 on an IFRS basis of between 380 to 400 cents per share and for earnings per share adjusted to remove net realized and unrealized foreign exchange profits of 155 to 175 cents per share. Actual earnings per share for 2019 on an IFRS basis were 382 cents per share and were towards the bottom end of the guidance range due to a revision in the calculation of the taxation charge, primarily relating to the appropriate exchange rate to apply in the calculation of the annual tax charge. Actual IFRS earnings per share adjusted to exclude foreign net realized and unrealized foreign exchange profits were 151 cents per share - slightly lower than the bottom end of the guidance range issued on January 30, 2021 due to the revision in the taxation charge. Adjusted earnings per share for 2019 excluding all foreign exchange gains and,inter alia, deferred tax and the proceeds of the sale of Eersteling were 144 cents.

Any outbreaks of contagious diseases and other adverse public health developments in countries where we operate could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. For example, the recent outbreak of COVID-19 first identified in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, has resulted in significant measures being implemented by governments of affected countries to control the spread of COVID-19, including restrictions on mobility and transportation. COVID-19 related restrictions and disruptions, including for employees, manufacturers, suppliers and customers across different industries, may negatively impact our business operations and therefore our financial results. In addition, COVID-19 may result in a widespread health crisis that could adversely affect the economies and financial markets of many countries, resulting in an economic downturn that could affect our ability to ~~meet the full year’s production target could be impacted by, among other factors, lower grades~~access or raise capital as and failure to achieve the targets set at Blanket Mine. Unforeseen changes in ore grades and recoveries, unexpected changes in the quality or quantity of reserves and resource, technical production issues, environmental and industrial accidents, gold theft, environmental factors and pollution could adversely impact the production, sales and cash operating costswhen needed for ~~fiscal year 2017.~~ business operations.

The foregoing expected results for ~~2017~~2020 are subject to risks and uncertainties and actual results may be lower. See “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements”.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

~~As at December 31, 2016, we had not entered into any~~

There are no off-balance sheet ~~arrangements.~~

arrangements apart from the facilitation loans of $30.97 million which are not reflected as loans receivable for IFRS purposes (refer to note 6 of the Consolidated Financial Statements).

Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations

As at December 31, 2019, the Company had the following contractual obligations:

$’000	Payments due by period
Falling due	Less than 1 year	1-3 years	4-5 years	More than 5 years
Trade and other payables	8,697	-	-	-
Term loan facility	529	1,942	-	-
Provisions	124	708	144	2,370
Capital expenditure commitments	371	-	-	-
Total	9,721	2,650	144	2,370

Except for capital expenditure commitments, the contractual obligations in the table above are based on the classification requirements under IFRS.

$’000 Payments due by Period

Within 1
Year
1-3 years 3-5 years
More than
5 years
Total
Trade and other payables 8,077 - - - 8,077
Term loan facility 1,410 1,577 - - 2,987
Provisions - - - 3,456 3,456
Capital expenditure commitments 2,122 - - - 2,122

ITEM 6 - DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES

Directors and Senior Management

The following is a list of our current directors and the Group’s officers as of March 30, ~~2016.~~

2020.

Name, Office Held and Municipality of Residence	Principal Occupations During Past Five Years	Company position(s) held Since	Number of Shares Beneficially Owned, Controlled or Directed as of March 30, 2020
Steven Curtis Chief Executive Officer & Director Johannesburg, South Africa	Previous VP Finance and Chief Financial Officer. Director of the Company and director of certain of its subsidiary companies. Chief Executive Officer.	Director since 2008 Chief Executive Officer since 2014	164,882
Leigh Wilson Non-Executive Director & Chairman Stuart, Florida, USA	Chairman of the Victory Portfolios Winston Maritime LLC Stella and Hack Wilson Family Foundation Martin Health Foundation	Director since 2012	52,000
Nick Clarke Non-Executive Director East Molesey, United Kingdom	Chairman and former Chief Executive Officer of Central Asia Metals Plc.	Director since 2019	Nil
John Kelly Non-Executive Director New Canaan, Connecticut	Independent Trustee, The Victory Funds (From February 2015). Non-Executive Member of CrossRoad LLC (From May 2009). Partner, McCarvill Capital Partners (September 2016 to September 2017). Managing Partner, Endgate Commodities LLC (August 2014 to January 2016). Adviser, Endgate Commodities LLC (January to April 2016). Chief Operating Officer, Liquidnet Holdings Inc. (2011-2014).	Director since 2012	29,493
Johan Holtzhausen Non-Executive Director Cape Town, South Africa	Business consultant and Independent Director of DRDGOLD Limited.	Director since 2013	19,825

Name, Office Held and Municipality of Residence Principal Occupations During Past Five Years Positions held Since Number of Shares Beneficially Owned, Controlled or Directed as of March 30, 2017
James Johnstone
Director
Gibsons, British Columbia, Canada
Retired. Formerly Chief Operating Officer of the Company and Director of several of its subsidiary companies. 1997 40,000
Steven Curtis Chief Executive Officer & Director
Johannesburg, South Africa
Previous VP Finance, Chief Financial Officer from March 2016 and Director of the Company and Director of certain of its subsidiary companies.
Director since 2008
Chief Executive Officer since 2014
420,000
Leigh Wilson
Director
Stuart, Florida, USA
Chairman of the Victory Portfolios
Winston Maritime LLC
FundVantage Trust
Stella and Hack Wilson Family Foundation

2012 215,000
John Kelly
Director
New Canaan, Connecticut
Partner at Endgate Commodities LLC, Member of CrossRoad LLC, Director of Liquidnet Europe Ltd, Officer of Liquidnet Holdings, Inc.

2012 57,465
Johan Holtzhausen
Director,
Cape Town, South Africa
Business consultant and Independent Director of DRDGOLD Limited.

2013 90,000
Dana Roets
Chief Operating Officer
Johannesburg, South Africa
VP and Head of Operations at Kloof Gold Mine. More recently, Dana was the COO at Great Basin Gold which had gold mining operations in the United States of America and South Africa. 2013 Nil
Mark Learmonth
Chief Financial Officer & Director Jersey, Channel Islands
Vice-President of the Company focused on financial reporting, investor and shareholder relations and corporate development. Former Vice-President Business Development, of the Company Chief Financial Officer since 2014 and Director since 2015 Vice-President, Business Development since 2008 324,750
John McGloin
Director
Bishops Stortford, United Kingdom
Previous Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Amara Mining Plc. Current non-executive director of Perseus Mining Limited 2016 Nil
Maurice Mason
VP Corporate Development and Investor Relations
London, England
Previous Director at Equity Research, for Stifel Nicolaus Europe Ltd 2016 35,000
Adam Chester
General Counsel, Company Secretary and Head of Risk and Compliance
Jersey, Channel Islands
Solicitor of the Supreme Court of England and Wales. Partner at Walkers and advocate of the Royal Court of Jersey. 2017 Nil

Name, Office Held and Municipality of Residence

Principal Occupations During Past Five Years

Company position(s) held Since

Number of Shares Beneficially Owned, Controlled or Directed as of March 30, 2020

Dana Roets Chief Operating Officer Johannesburg, South Africa	Chief Operating Officer.	Chief Operating Officer since 2013	Nil
Mark Learmonth Chief Financial Officer & Director Jersey, Channel Islands	Vice-President of the Company focused on financial reporting, investor and shareholder relations and corporate development. Former Vice-President Business Development of the Company.	Chief Financial Officer since 2014, Director since 2015 and formerly Vice-President, Business Development since 2008	149,775
John McGloin Non-Executive Director Bishops Stortford, United Kingdom	Previous Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Amara Mining Plc. Current non-executive director of Perseus Mining Limited, non-executive chairman of Oriole Resources Plc and non-executive director of Amphi Capital Limited.	Director since 2016	Nil
Maurice Mason VP Corporate Development and Investor Relations London, England	Previous Director at Equity Research for Stifel Nicolaus Europe Ltd. Research analyst, Peel Hunt LLP (2012-2015).	VP Corporate Development and Investor Relations since 2016	36,137
Adam Chester General Counsel, Company Secretary and Head of Risk and Compliance Jersey, Channel Islands	Solicitor of the Supreme Court of England and Wales. Partner at Walkers and advocate of the Royal Court of Jersey.	General Counsel, Company Secretary and Head of Risk and Compliance since 2017	25,553

No family relationships exist between any of the Directors or ~~Senior~~senior management.

A brief profile of each of the Directors and the officers is given below:

~~James Johnstone,~~ ~~B.Sc., ARCST, Director~~

A graduate-mining engineer Mr. Johnstone has 40 years’ experience in mine operations in North America, Africa and Europe. He has experience in both underground and open pit operations. For the 20 years prior to his retirement he was employed as General Manager or Vice-President Operations for mining companies producing gold, base metals and industrial minerals. Mr. Johnstone has been responsible for the construction, start up and commissioning of two major mines in addition to the commissioning of Caledonia's Filon Sur operation. He has also been involved in the orderly closure of three operations. He has operated successfully in environmentally sensitive areas and has a good understanding of the permitting process in Canada and the United States. Mr. Johnstone joined Caledonia in April 1997 as Vice President Operations and was responsible for Caledonia's operations in Zambia and South Africa and for all activities in Canada. He was elected a Director of Caledonia in June 1997. He retired from active employment with Caledonia in September, 2006.

Steven Curtis, CA (SA) – Director and Chief Executive Officer

Mr. Steven Roy Curtis is a Chartered Accountant with over 2435 years of experience and has held a number of senior financial positions in the manufacturing industry. Before joining Caledonia in April 2006, he was Director Finance and Supply Chain for Avery Dennison SA and, prior to this, Financial Director and then Managing Director of Jackstadt GmbH South African operation. Mr. Curtis is a member of the South African Institute of Chartered Accountants and graduated from the University of Cape Town.

Mr. Curtis was appointed Vice-President Finance and Chief Financial Officer ~~of the Company~~ in April 2006 and served in the position until Dec 2014 when he was appointed as President and Chief Executive Officer.

Leigh Wilson - Non-Executive Director and Chairman

Mr. Leigh Alan Wilson has been a senior executive in international business and financial services and held positions with Union Bank of Switzerland (Securities) Ltd. in London and with the Paribas Group in Paris and New York where he served as CEO of Paribas North America between 1984 and 1990.

Mr. Wilson has served on the Board of Trustees of a mutual fund complex managed by Victory Capital Management since 1993. He currently serves as Independent Chairman of the Board.

The mutual fund complex is the largest client of Victory Capital Management high of Trustees of the mutual fund complex managed by Victory Capital Management, an independent investment management firm with total assets and advisement as of December 31, 2019 of $61.8 billion.

In March 2006, Mr. Wilson received the Mutual Fund Trustee of the Year Award from Institutional Investor Magazine. Between March 2008 and October 2008, Mr. Wilson was an Independent Non-Executive Director of the Company.

Nick Clarke - Non-Executive Director

Mr. Nick Clarke joined the Company’s board as a Non-Executive Director on September 23, 2019. Mr. Clarke, who is Chairman of Central Asia Metals PLC (AIM: CAML), is a highly experienced Chartered Engineer (CEng) with 45 years in the mining industry. He has held senior positions in several resource companies and is well known as a successful executive in the sector having been involved in the construction of major mining projects and conducted several fundraisings on AIM and TSX.

He has an extensive background in managing AIM and TSX listed minerals companies including his current position as Chairman of Central Asia Metals PLC, where he was CEO from 2009 until 2016. Between 2004 and 2008 he was Managing Director

Mr. Leigh Alan Wilson has an international business and financial services background having served in senior executive and management positions with Union Bank of Switzerland (Securities) Ltd. in London and with the Paribas Group in Paris and New York where he served as CEO of Paribas North America between 1984 and 1990.

Mr. Wilson has served on the Victory Fund Board since 1993. He currently serves as Independent Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Victory fund and of the Munder Fund. The Victory and Munder Funds have assets aggregating to US $40 billion.

Mr. Wilson is also the Chief Executive Officer of New Century Home Health Care Inc., a role he has held since 1995. In March 2006, Mr. Wilson received the Mutual Fund Trustee of the Year Award from Institutional Investor Magazine.

of Oriel Resources plc (AIM: ORI) and from 2006 to 2008 he was President and CEO of Lero Gold Corporation (TSX: LER). Mr. Clarke has significant experience as a non-executive director of a number of AIM and TSX listed resource companies having previously held non-executive directorships on the boards of Afcan Mining Corp. (TSX: AFK), Caledon Resources plc (AIM: CDN), Obtala Resources plc (AIM: OBT), Columbus Copper Corp (TSX: CCU) and Sunkar Resources plc (AIM: SKR).

Mr. Clarke is an Associate of Camborne School of Mines (ACSM). He is a trustee of the Camborne School of Mines Trust and is a member of the Institution of Materials Minerals & Mining (MIMMM).

John Kelly - Non-Executive Director

Mr. John Lawson Kelly has over 3536 years of experience in the financial services industry in the U.S.A and international markets including emerging markets in Asia. Mr. Kelly is currently ~~partner at EndGate Commodities LLC, CrossRoad LLC, and is~~ an Independent Trustee of the Victory ~~Funds.~~

Funds and a non-executive Member of CrossRoad LLC. Within the last five years, Mr. Kelly has been a partner of McCarvill Capital Partners and EndGate Commodities LLC, an officer of Liquidnet Holdings, Inc. and a director of Liquidnet Europe Ltd. Mr. Kelly is a graduate of Yale University and the Yale School of Management.

Johan Holtzhausen - Non-Executive Director

Mr. Johan Andries Holtzhausen is a retired partner of KPMG South Africa with 42 years of audit experience, of which 36 years were as a partner focused on the mining sector. Mr. Holtzhausen chaired the Mining Interest Group at KPMG South Africa and his clients included major listed mining companies operating in Africa and elsewhere, which operated across a broad range of commodities. In addition to his professional qualifications, Mr. Holtzhausen holds a B.Sc. from the University of Stellenbosch, majoring in chemistry and geology.

Mr. Holtzhausen is chairman of the Finance, Audit and Risk Committees of Strategic Partners in Tourism and its related party the Tourism Micro Enterprises Support Fund, both of which are not-for-profit organizations. Until February 28, ~~February~~ 2011, Mr. Holtzhausen served as a director of KPMG Inc. and KPMG Services (Pty) Ltd, both of which are private companies registered in South Africa and which provided audit, taxation and advisory services.

Dana Roets – Chief Operating Officer

Mr. Dana Roets is a qualified Mining Engineer and holds a B.Sc. Mining Engineering degree from Pretoria University (1986) and an MBA from the University of Cape Town (1995). ~~Dana~~Mr. Roets is a South African national with over 2425 years of operational and managerial experience in the South African gold and platinum ~~industry.~~industries. He started his career with Gold Fields at the St Helena Gold Mine as a graduate trainee and progressed via various operational roles from being an underground shift boss to become Vice President and Head of Operations at Kloof Gold Mine in January 1999 at which time Kloof produced over 1,000,000 ounces of gold per annum. More recently, ~~Dana~~Mr. Roets was the COO at Great Basin Gold which had gold mining operations in the United States of America and South Africa. ~~Dana Roets is located at Caledonia’s Africa office in Johannesburg, South Africa.~~

Mark Learmonth –Director and Chief Financial Officer

Mr. John Mark Learmonth joined Caledonia in July 2008. Prior to this, he was a Division Director of Investment Banking at Macquarie First South in South Africa and has over 17 years of experience in corporate finance and investment banking, predominantly in the resources sector. Mr. Learmonth graduated from Oxford University and is a chartered accountant. He is a member of the Executive Committee of the Chamber of Mines, Zimbabwe and is also a member of the Gold Producers Sub-Committee.

Mr. Learmonth was appointed Vice-President Finance, Chief Financial Officer of the Company in November 2014.

Mr. Learmonth was responsible for Investor Relations and Corporate Development of the Company until the appointment of Mr. Maurice Mason.

John McGloin - Non-Executive Director

~~Director~~

John McGloin is the former Chairman and Chief Executive of Amara Mining and is currently a ~~Non-executive~~non-executive director of Perseus ~~Mining.~~Mining Limited, the non-executive chairman of Oriole Resources Plc and a non-executive director of Amphi Capital Limited. Mr. McGloin joined Caledonia in August ~~2016, he~~2016. He is a geologist and graduate of Camborne School of Mines.

Mr. McGloin worked for many years in Africa within the mining industry before moving into consultancy. He joined Arbuthnot Banking Group following four years at Evolution Securities as their mining analyst. He is also the former Head of Mining at Collins Stewart.

Maurice Mason -VP Corporate Development and Investor Relations

Mr. Maurice Mason is a dual South African and UK national, resident in London, who holds a BSc in Engineering from the University of Natal, South Africa and an MBA from Henley Management College. Mr. Mason’s career includes positions at Unilever, SABMiller and Anglo American. Most recently, Mr. Mason was director, Equity Research, for Stifel Nicolaus Europe Ltd covering mining companies listed in the UK. Mr. Mason has taken over the day-to-day responsibility for Investor Relations and Corporate Development from Mr. Learmonth, who, since November 2014 had combined this role with that of Chief Financial Officer.

Adam Chester –General Counsel, Company Secretary and Head of Risk and Compliance

In January 2017 MrMr. Adam Chester joined the management team as General Counsel, Company Secretary and Head of Risk and Compliance. Mr. Chester is a dual qualified lawyer (England and Jersey, Channel Islands) and previously worked as a solicitor of the Supreme Court of England and Wales at international law firms in the City of London and, more recently, as an advocate of the Royal Court of Jersey at an international offshore law firm in which he was a partner. He has approximately 15 years’ experience advising businesses and individuals on a variety of commercial and corporate legal issues.

Arrangements, Understandings, etc.

Caledonia has no arrangements or understanding with any major shareholders, customers, suppliers or others, pursuant to which any person referred to above was selected as a director or member of senior management.

Compensation

Summary Compensation Table

Name and principal position Year Salary
Long term incentive plan ⁽²⁾
Annual incentive plans
All other
compensation
Total compensation
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (h) (i)
Steven Curtis
ChiefExecutive Officer
2016
2015
2014

428,637
428,637
410,085
214,282
-
-

-
-
60,012
42,867
⁽¹⁾180,255
40,758
685,786
608,892
510,855
Dana Roets
Chief Operating Officer
2016
2015
2014

418,182
418,182
400,083

140,107
-
-

-
-
60,012

41,818
⁽¹⁾138,000
-

600,107
556,182
460,095

Mark Learmonth
Chief Financial Officer
2016
2015
2014

410,000
360,000
275,057

122,410
-
-

-
-
60,012

41,000
⁽¹⁾154,000
-

573,410
514,000
335,069

Caxton Mangezi
General Manager and Director of the Blanket Mine
2016
2015
2014

348,400
348,400
335,069

115,383
-
-

-
-
27,922

205,226
⁽¹⁾190,002
10,002

669,009
538,402
372,993

Maurice Mason
VP Corporate Development and Investor Relations

2016
2015
2014
96,735
-
-
25,610
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
122,345
-
-

Name and principal position

Year

Salary ($)

Share-based awards ($)⁽¹⁾

Option-based awards

Non-equity incentive plan compensation

($)

Pension value

($)

All other

compensation

($)

Total compensation

($)

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

(h)⁽²⁾

(i)

Annual incentive plans ⁽¹⁾

Long term incentive plans

Steven Curtis

Chief Executive Officer

2019

2018

2017

459,900

450,000

428,637

200,391

80,562

363,948

70,000

45,000

48,000

730,291

575,562

840,585

Dana Roets

Chief Operating Officer

2019

2018

2017

442,602

418,182

128,217

52,678

237,966

65,000

41,818

47,000

662,292

512,678

703,148

Mark Learmonth

Chief Financial Officer

2019

2018

2017

433,942

410,000

163,350

43,267

229,218

65,000

41,000

44,000

662,292

494,267

683,218

Caxton Mangezi

General Manager and Director of the Blanket Mine

2019

2018

2017

450,377

358,503

348,400

107,050

43,379

195,967

63,771

124,518

117,322

621,198

526,400

661,689

Adam Chester

General Counsel, Company Secretary and Head of Risk and Compliance

2019

2018

2017

281,744

273,872

257,489

73,046

14,936

70,019

29,773

32,768

26,686

384,563

321,576
354,194

Maurice Mason

VP Investor Relations and Corporate Development

2019

2018

2017

197,145

179,010

151,734

51,859

6,381

66,631

20,145

15,654

15,735

269,149

201,045

234,100

⁽¹⁾

^{OEICP awards (also referred to herein as Long-term incentive plan or LTIPs) represents the non-cash expense amount as determined by the method described in note 27.1 of the Consolidated Financial Statements and are, following amendment to allow for settlement in shares as well as or instead of cash, considered to be share based awards . Note 27.1 (a) of the Consolidated Financial Statements indicates the amounts that settled during 2019.}

⁽²⁾

^{Bonuses paid to directors and key management (Refer to note 35 of the Consolidated Financial Statements)}

Non-executive director fees were paid in equal quarterly instalments in arrears during 2019. From January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019 the approved non-executive director fees amounted to $55,000 p.a. payable to non-executive directors other than Mr. John McGloin who received $58,640 during the year and Mr. Nick Clarke who received $16,315 for his services from September 23, 2019.

~~(1) Bonuses paid to directors and key management (Refer note 28 of the Consolidated Financial Statements)~~

~~(2)~~

Long term incentive plan awards are stated at the fair value and option amount outstanding as at December 31, 2016. None of the amounts presented has been paid to date and will vest on the dates mentioned in the table below; refer to note 21.2 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information. During the year equity share options were granted to Mr. J McGloin (Non-Executive Director) that are excluded from this table.

Non-Executive Directors’ fees of $45,000 per annum were paid in 4 equal quarterly payments in advance during fiscal 2016. The non-Executive Directors’ fees will be paid in arrears from fiscal year 2017. The fee was revised in fiscal year 2016 from CAD 45,000 in fiscal year 2015 annually.

~~Long-term Incentive Plan~~

The following key management members were granted RSUs and PSUs, pursuant to the provisions of the OEICP. The outstanding RSUs and PSUs as at December 31, ~~2016~~2019 were as follows:

Key management member Vesting date RSU’s PSU’s
Steve Curtis January 11, 2019 132,146 503,226
Dana Roets January 11, 2019 86,403 329,032
Mark Learmonth January 11, 2019 28,801 109,677
March 23, 2019 56,565 219,355
Caxton Mangezi January 11,2019 71,156 270,968
Maurice Mason August 6, 2019 26,103 102,353
Total 401,174 1,534,611

Key management member	Vesting date	RSUs	PSUs
Steve Curtis	2022/01/11	-	44,309
Dana Roets	2022/01/11	-	27,898
Mark Learmonth	2022/01/11	-	28,287
Caxton Mangezi	2022/01/11	-	23,533
Adam Chester	2020/01/19	5,052	17,774
Maurice Mason	2022/01/11		14,672
Total		5,052	156,473

For further detail on the ~~RSU’s~~RSUs and ~~PSU’s~~PSUs refer to note ~~21.2~~27.1 (a) of the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Refer to ~~item 6E~~Item 6.E for a breakdown of director equity options outstanding, these equity options and their grant dates.

Caledonia does not have a pension, retirement or similar benefits scheme for Directors.

Board Practices

The directors all hold their positions for an indefinite term, subject to re-election at each annual general meeting of the shareholders. The officers hold their positions subject to being removed by resolution of the board of directors. The term of office of each director expires as of the date that an annual general meeting of the shareholders is held, subject to the re-election of a ~~particular~~ director at such annual general meeting. The following persons comprise the following committees:

Audit	Compensation	Governance	Nomination	Disclosure
J Holtzhausen	L Wilson	L Wilson	L Wilson	M Learmonth
J McGloin	J Kelly	J Kelly	J Holtzhausen	S R Curtis
J Kelly	J Holtzhausen	J ~~Johnstone~~McGloin	J ~~Johnstone~~McGloin	J Holtzhausen
	~~J Johnstone~~		~~J McGloin~~N Clarke	L Wilson
			~~S Curtis~~	J Kelly
				D Roets
Technical	Strategic Planning			M Mason
J ~~Johnstone~~Holtzhausen	L Wilson			A Chester
~~J Holtzhausen~~D Roets	J Kelly
~~D Roets~~J McGloin	S R Curtis
~~J McGloin~~S Curtis	M Learmonth
~~S Curtis~~N Clarke	D Roets
	J McGloin
	J Holtzhausen M Mason
	~~J Johnstone~~
	~~M Mason~~N Clarke

Terms of reference of the Audit Committee are given in the ~~Charter~~charter of the Audit ~~Committee. The Charters~~Committee, and the terms of reference of the ~~other~~Compensation Committee are given in the charter of the Compensation Committee. All charters of committees are available on the Company’s website or, on request, from the Company’s offices listed in this report.

The Audit Committee is comprised of the following ~~Directors~~directors: (i) Johan Holtzhausen (Chairperson), (ii) John McGloin, and (iii) John Kelly. Each member of the Audit Committee is considered independent as defined under NICanadian National Instrument 52-110 and as defined pursuant to Section 803 of the NYSE ~~MKT~~American LLC Company Guide (as such definition may be modified or supplemented) and considered to be financially literate as such terms are defined under Canadian National Instrument 52-110 Audit Committees. The SEC has indicated that the designation of an audit committee financial expert does not make that person an "expert" for any purpose, impose any duties, obligations, or liability on that person that

Benefits upon termination are ~~greater than those imposed on members~~disclosed in note 33 of the ~~audit committee~~Consolidated Financial Statements and ~~board of directors who do not carry this designation, or affect the duties, obligations, or liabilities of any other member of the audit committee.~~an example contract is disclosed in Exhibit 4.2.

Employees

The average, approximate number of employees, their categories and geographic ~~location~~locations for each of the last ~~5 years~~3-years are summarized in the table below:

Geographic Location and Number of Employees:

Employee Location 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Total Employees
London, United Kingdom - - - - 1
Jersey, Channel Islands - - - - 2
South Africa (African Office) 10 13 14 14 13
Zimbabwe – approx.⁽ⁱ⁾
860 1,028 1,007 1,157 1,282
South Africa (Mine Security and Operations and Exploration) 1 1 1 1 1
Zambia (Head Office and Security) 8 8 6 - -
Total Employees at all Locations 879 1,050 1,028 1,172 1,299

~~(i) the number of employees in Zimbabwe varies slightly from month-to-month.~~

Employee Location	2017	2018	2019
Total Employees
London, United Kingdom - Management and administration	1	1	1
Jersey, Channel Islands - Management and administration	3	3	3
South Africa - Management, procurement, administration and technical	14	15	13
Zimbabwe - Mine operations.⁽ⁱ⁾	1,410	1,445	1,569
South Africa (Eersteling)	1	1	-
Total Employees at all Locations	1,429	1,465	1,586

40Management and Administration:

Management and Administration:
Employee Locations: 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
London, United Kingdom - - - - 1
Jersey, Channel Islands - - - - 2
Zimbabwe 32 32 36 37 42
South Africa (African Office) 7 12 12 12 13
South Africa (Exploration and Operations) 2 1 1 1 1
Zambia (Head Office and Security) 4 4 4 - -
Total Management and Administration 45 49 53 50 59

Employee Locations:	2017	2018	2019
London, United Kingdom - Management and administration	1	1	1
Jersey, Channel Islands - Management and administration	2	3	3
Zimbabwe - Mine operations	44	44	44
South Africa - Management, procurement, administration and technical	12	14	12
South Africa (Eersteling)	-	-	-
Total Management and Administration	59	62	60

Share Ownership

~~(a)The direct and indirect shareholdings of the Company’s directors, officers and senior management as at March 30, 2017 were as follows:~~

Number of shares Percentage share holding
L Wilson 215,000 0.41 %
J Johnstone 40,000 0.08 %
S Curtis 420,000 0.80 %
M Learmonth 324,750 0.62 %
J. Kelly 57,465 0.11 %
D Roets Nil -
J Holtzhausen 90,000 0.17 %
J McGloin Nil -
M Mason 35,000 0.07 %
Total 1,182,215 2.26 %

(a)

The direct and indirect shareholdings of the Company’s directors, officers and senior management as at March 30, 2020 were as follows:

	Number of shares	Percentage share holding
L Wilson	52,000	0.45%
S Curtis	164,882	1.43%
M Learmonth	149,775	1.30%
J. Kelly	29,493	0.26%
J Holtzhausen	19,825	0.17%
M Mason	36,137	0.31%
A Chester	25,553	0.22%
J McGloin	Nil	0%
N Clarke	Nil	0%
C Mangezi	Nil	0%
D Roets	Nil	0%
Total	477,665	4.15%

All of the shares held above are voting shares and do not have any different voting or other rights than the other outstanding shares of the Company.

~~As at March 30, 2017, the directors, officers and senior management, collectively, owned 1,182,215 shares, being approximately 2.26% of the issued shares.~~

The information as to shares beneficially owned or controlled or directed, not being within the knowledge of the Company, has been furnished by the respective directors, officers and senior management members individually.

(b)

Share purchase options outstanding as of March 30, ~~2017:~~2020:

Name Exercise Price CAD Expiry Date Number of Options
J Johnstone 0.90 September 10, 2018 28,000
A Lawson 0.90 September 10, 2018 3,000
T Pearton 0.90 September 10, 2018 25,000
C Mangezi 0.90 September 10, 2018 100,000
P Dell 0.90 September 10, 2018 3,000
P Human 0.90 September 10, 2018 5,000
S Smith 0.90 September 10, 2018 2,400
J Kelly 0.90 September 10, 2018 90,000
R Patricio 0.90 September 10, 2018 90,000
DSA Corporate Services 0.80 October 7, 2020 25,000
J McGloin 2.30 October 13, 2021 90,000
TOTAL 461,400

Name

Exercise Price CAD

Expiry Date

Number of Options

DSA Corporate Services

Advisor

4.00

October 7, 2020

5,000

J McGloin

Non-Executive Director

11.50

October 13, 2021

18,000

J Staiger

Advisor

8.10

May 30, 2022

5,000

P Chidley

Advisor

*9.30

August 25, 2024

5,000

P Durham

Advisor

*9.30

August 25, 2024

5,000

TOTAL

38,000

^*The exercise price of CAD$9.30 per share was converted into a USD amount of $7.35 at the prevailing USD/CAD exchange rate at the date of grant (August 25, 2017).

In terms of the ~~approved plan,~~OEICP, the expiry of the options that expire in a closed period will be extended by 10 days from the cessation of the closed period.

ITEM 7 - MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Major Shareholders

To the best of Caledonia's knowledge, as at March 30, 2020, we are aware of ~~December 31, 2016 there was one shareholder~~the following beneficial owners that ~~beneficially owned,~~ directly or indirectly ~~or exercises~~exercise control or direction over more than 5% of the voting shares of Caledonia. Allan Gray, an investment trust/fund manager, owned 8,431,000 shares of the Company, representing 15.97% of the current issued share capital of the Company as at December 31, 2016.

rights to our shares.

Beneficial owner name	Number of Shares Held	Percentage of Issued Shares
Allan Gray (through two of its funds)	2,070,348	17.98%
Sales promotion Services S.A./ Heinrich Auwärter	848,773	7.37%
TD Ameritrade	884,647	7.68%
Fremiro	727,266	6.32%

All shareholders have the same voting rights as all other shareholders of Caledonia.

~~To the best of the knowledge of Caledonia, based on information in its~~

According to our share register and information received from our registrar on March ~~30, 2017, the portion of~~9, 2020 the shares of Caledonia is(including those represented by depositary interests) were held in the following geographic locations:

Geographic Area

Number of Shares Held

Percentage of Issued Shares

USA
20,469,964 38.77 %
Canada 16,092,913 30.49 %
United Kingdom 15,672,353 29.69 %
Other 552,236 1.05 %
52,787,466 100 %

Caledonia is not, to the best of its knowledge, directly or indirectly owned or controlled by another corporation or corporations, by any other natural or legal person or persons severally or jointly or by any foreign government.

Geographic Location	Number of Shares Held	Percentage of Issued Shares
United Kingdom	4,696,301	40.8%
USA	3,698,409	32.1%
Canada	2,360,744	20.5%
Zimbabwe	727,266	6.3%
Other	33,140	0.3%
	11,515,860	100%

Caledonia is not aware of any arrangement ~~the operation of~~ which may at some subsequent date result in a change of control of Caledonia.

The foregoing information in this paragraph is based exclusively on information with respect to recorded shareholders in the Company’s share register. The Company does not have actual information available as to who may be the beneficial owners of the Company’s issued shares and, specifically, does not know the identity of the beneficial owners of the shares who are registered in two large intermediaries.

Related Party Transactions

~~The aggregate value of~~

No related party transactions ~~and outstanding balances relating to key management personnel and entities over which they have control or significant influence were as follows:~~

$’000 2014 2015 2016
Key management salaries and bonuses 1,781 2,452 2,033
Share-based payment awards ⁽¹⁾
- 24 788
1,781 2,476 2,821

~~(1) Refer to~~exist, other than disclosed in note ~~21.1 and 21.2~~35 of the Consolidated Financial ~~Statement for detail of equity and cash settled share based payment awards.~~

Employees, officers, directors, consultants and other service providers also participate in Caledonia’s share option program (see note 21 of the Consolidated Financial Statements). Group entities of Caledonia are set out in note 29 of the Consolidated Financial Statements. ~~The share option plan is filed as exhibit 4.1 of the Annual Report.~~

As at December 31, 2016 employee contracts between the Company or Caledonia Mining South Africa Proprietary Limited and key management, include an option for respective key management to terminate such employee contract in the event of a change in control of the Company and to receive a severance payment equal to two years’ compensation. If this was triggered as at December 31, 2016 the severance payment would have amounted to $4,646,000 (2015: $3,578,000; 2014: $3,611,000). A change in control would constitute:

·	~~the acquisition of more than 50% of the shares; or~~

·	~~the acquisition of the right to exercise the majority of the voting rights of the shares; or~~

·	~~the acquisition of the right to appoint the majority of the board of directors; or~~

·	~~the acquisition of more than 50% of the assets of Caledonia.~~

C.	Interests of Experts and Counsel

Not ~~Applicable.~~

applicable.

ITEM 8 - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information

This Annual Report contains the audited Consolidated Financial Statements which comprise the consolidated statements of financial position as at December 31, ~~2016~~2019 and December 31, ~~2015~~2018 and the related consolidated statements of profit or loss and other comprehensive income, consolidated statements of changes in equity and consolidated statements of cash flows for the ~~three~~ years ended December 31, ~~2016,~~2019, December 31, ~~2015~~2018 and December 31, ~~2014.~~

2017.

Reference is made to page 6169 where the Consolidated Financial Statements are filed as part of this Annual Report on pages F1 – ~~F58~~

~~Dividend Policy~~

On July 5, 2016 Caledonia announced a quarterly dividend of 1.375 United States cents per share, which was paid at the end of July 2016; further dividends of 1.375 United States cents were paid at the end of October 2016 and January 2017. The increased dividend represents Caledonia’s revised dividend policy. It is currently envisaged that the dividend of 5.5 United States cents per annum will be maintained in 2017.

~~There are currently no restrictions on the Company which would prevent it from paying dividends.~~

F75.

Legal Proceedings and Regulatory Actions

To our knowledge, there are no legal proceedings material to us to which we are or were a party to or of which any of our properties are or were the subject of during the financial year ended December 31, ~~2016~~2019 nor are there any such proceedings known to us to be contemplated which would materially impact our financial position or ability to continue as a going concern.

During the ~~twelve-month period~~twelve months ended December 31, ~~2016,~~2019, there were no (i) penalties or sanctions imposed against us by a court relating to securities legislation or by a securities regulatory authority; (ii) penalties or sanctions imposed by a court or regulatory body against us that would likely be considered important to a reasonable investor in making an investment decision, or (iii) settlement agreements we entered into before a court relating to securities legislation or with a securities regulatory authority.

Dividend policy

On January 3, 2020, the Company announced an increased quarterly dividend to 7.50 US cents (from the previous 6.875 US cents per share paid quarterly). The quarterly dividend of 7.50 US cents per quarter (payable at the end of January, April, July and October) represents Caledonia’s current dividend policy which is expected to be maintained.

Significant Changes

We have not experienced any significant changes since the date of the Consolidated Financial Statements included with this Annual Report except as disclosed in this Annual Report.

ITEM 9 - THE OFFERING AND LISTING

Offering and Listing Details

The Company’s shares oftrade on the ~~Company have been quoted for~~TSX under the trading symbol “CAL” and on the NYSE American under the trading symbol “CMCL”. The Company’s depositary interests in the ~~U.S. on the OTCQX under “CALVF” since October 2011 and depositary interests representing the~~ shares ~~have been~~are admitted to trading on AIM ~~in London~~ under the trading symbol “CMCL” ~~since June 27, 2005.~~ .

Plan of Distribution

Not applicable.

Markets

The ~~principal marketplace for~~Company’s shares trade on the ~~Company is~~TSX and the ~~trading of~~NYSE American and depositary interests in its shares are admitted to trading on AIM. ~~During the year ended December 31, 2016, 10,206,200 depository interests were traded on AIM at prices that ranged between a high of £1.43 and a low of £0.38 per depository interest.~~

The high and low market prices expressed in Pounds Sterling on AIM for our depositary interests for the last five financial years, for the last six months, and each quarter for the last three fiscal years is as follows:

AIM
(Pound Sterling)
Last Six Months
High Low
March 2017 (up to 13 March) 1.14 1.12
February 2017 1.18 1.12
January 2017 1.18 0.83
December 2016 0.88 0.77
November 2016 1.33 0.84
October 2016 1.43 1.25
September 2016 1.37 1.00

2016
High Low
Fourth Quarter ended December 31, 2016 1.43 0.77
Third Quarter ended September 31, 2016 1.37 0.75
Second Quarter ended June 30, 2016 0.74 0.57
First Quarter ended March 31, 2016 0.59 0.38

2015
High Low
Fourth Quarter ended December 31, 2015 0.44 0.37
Third Quarter ended September 31, 2015 0.49 0.36
Second Quarter ended June 30, 2015 0.48 0.34
First Quarter ended March 31, 2015 0.38 0.33

2014
High Low
Fourth Quarter ended December 31, 2014 0.49 0.30
Third Quarter ended September 31, 2014 0.50 0.42
Second Quarter ended June 30, 2014 0.42 0.35
First Quarter ended March 31, 2014 0.38 0.27

2013
High Low
Fourth Quarter ended December 31, 2013 0.38 0.34
Third Quarter ended September 31, 2013 0.47 0.38
Second Quarter ended June 30, 2013 0.70 0.47
First Quarter ended March 31, 2013 0.66 0.45

Last Five Fiscal Years
High Low
2016 1.43 0.38
2015 0.49 0.33
2014 0.50 0.27
2013 0.70 0.34
2012 0.63 0.33

The high and low market prices expressed in Canadian dollars on the Toronto Stock Exchange for our shares for the last five financial years, for the last six months, and each quarter for the last three fiscal years are as follows:

TSX
(Canadian Dollars)
Last Six Months
High Low
March 2017 (up to 14 March) 1.86 1.80
February 2017 1.98 1.77
January 2017 1.89 1.54
December 2016 1.45 1.28
November 2016 2.23 1.35
October 2016 2.39 2.09
September 2016 2.35 1.71

2016
High
Low
Fourth Quarter ended December 31, 2016 2.39 1.28
Third Quarter ended September 31, 2016 2.35 1.30
Second Quarter ended June 30, 2016 1.40 1.05
First Quarter ended March 31, 2016 1.12 0.79

2015
High
Low
Fourth Quarter ended December 31, 2015 0.84 0.67
Third Quarter ended September 31, 2015 0.96 0.70
Second Quarter ended June 30, 2015 0.95 0.66
First Quarter ended March 31, 2015 0.75 0.62

2014
High
Low
Fourth Quarter ended December 31, 2014 0.81 0.77
Third Quarter ended September 31, 2014 1.10 1.07
Second Quarter ended June 30, 2014 0.87 0.85
First Quarter ended March 31, 2014 0.80 0.77

Last Five Fiscal Years
High Low
2016 2.39 0.79
2015 0.96 0.62
2014 0.90 0.86
2013 1.40 0.67
2012 1.25 0.60

~~The high and low market prices expressed in USD on the OTCQX for our shares for the last five financial years, for the last six months, and each quarter for the last three fiscal years is as follows:~~

OTCQX
(USD)
Last Six Months
High Low
March 2017 (up to 13 March) 1.37 1.33
February 2017 1.53 1.36
January 2017 1.45 1.16
December 2016 1.14 0.96
November 2016 1.68 1.00
October 2016 1.82 1.55
September 2016 1.77 1.31

2016
High Low
Fourth Quarter ended December 31, 2016 1.82 0.96
Third Quarter ended September 31, 2016 1.77 0.98
Second Quarter ended June 30, 2016 1.09 0.79
First Quarter ended March 31, 2016 0.89 0.54

2015
High Low
Fourth Quarter ended December 31, 2015 0.66 0.49
Third Quarter ended September 31, 2015 0.76 0.53
Second Quarter ended June 30, 2015 0.79 0.52
First Quarter ended March 31, 2015 0.63 0.51

2014
High Low
Fourth Quarter ended December 31, 2014 0.71 0.56
Third Quarter ended September 31, 2014 1.01 0.98
Second Quarter ended June 30, 2014 0.80 0.78
First Quarter ended March 31, 2014 0.73 0.70

Last Five Fiscal Years
High Low
2016 1.82 0.54
2015 0.79 0.49
2014 0.81 0.78
2013 1.45 0.65
2012 1.25 0.65

Selling Shareholders

Not applicable.

Dilution

Not applicable.

Expenses of the Issue

Not applicable.

ITEM 10 - ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Share Capital

Not Applicable.

Articles of Association

Securities Registrar

Computershare Investor Services Inc. is the transfer agent and registrar for the shares at its principal office in the City of Toronto, with branch registrars of transfers at Computershare Trust Company, N.A office in the City of Golden, Colorado. Computershare Investor Services PLC at its principal office in Bristol, United Kingdom is the transfer agent for the depositary interests.

Director’s power to vote on a proposal, arrangement or contract in which the director is materially interested.

An interested director must disclose to the Company the nature and extent of any interest in a transaction with the Company, or one of its subsidiaries, which to a material extent conflicts or may conflict with its interests and of which the director is aware. Failure to disclose an interest entitles the Company or a shareholder to apply to the court for an order setting aside the transaction concerned and directing that the director account to the Company for any profit.

A transaction is not voidable and a director is not accountable notwithstanding a failure to disclose an interest if the transaction is confirmed by special resolution and the nature and extent of the director’s interest in the transaction are disclosed in reasonable detail in the notice calling the meeting at which the resolution is passed.

Although it may still order that a director account for any profit, a court will not set aside a transaction unless it is satisfied that the interests of third parties who have acted in good faith would not thereby be unfairly prejudiced and the transaction was not reasonable and fair in the Company’s interests at the time it was entered into.

Except as otherwise provided in the Articles (as defined below) and save in respect of a limited number of instances as set out in the Articles, a director shall not vote on, or be counted in the quorum in relation to, any resolution of the board or of a committee of the board concerning any matter in which he has to his knowledge, directly or indirectly, an interest (other than his interest in shares or debentures or other securities of, or otherwise in or through, the Company) or duty which (together with any interest of a person connected with him) is material and, if he shall do so, his vote shall not be counted.

Directors’ power, in the absence of an independent quorum, to vote compensation to themselves or any members of their body.

The compensation of the directors is decided by the directors unless the board of directors specifically requests approval of the compensation from the shareholders. If the issuance of compensation to the directors is decided by the directors, a quorum is the majority of the directors in office. The Articles do not require that the compensation of any director be approved by disinterested directors.

The Company has a compensation committee that is currently composed of three independent directors. The compensation committee makes recommendations to the board with respect to compensation, including bonuses, incentive stock options and securities of directors and executive officers.

Borrowing powers exercisable by the directors and how such borrowing powers may be varied.

The board may exercise all the Company’s powers to borrow money, to guarantee, to indemnify and to mortgage or charge all or any part of the Company’s undertaking, property and assets (present and future) and uncalled capital and, subject to the Companies Law to issue debentures and other securities, whether outright or as collateral security, for any debt, liability or obligation of the Company or of any third party.

The board shall restrict the Company’s borrowings and exercise all voting and other rights or powers of control exercisable by the Company in relation to its subsidiary undertakings (if any) to secure (but as regards subsidiary undertakings only in so far as by the exercise of such rights or powers of control the board can secure) that the aggregate principal amount from time to time outstanding of all borrowings by the Company’s group (exclusive of borrowings owing by one member of the Company’s group to another member of the Company’s group) shall not at any time without the previous sanction of an ordinary resolution of the Company exceed an amount equal to three times the Adjusted Capital and Reserves (as defined in the Articles). The borrowing powers may be varied by amendment to the Articles which requires approval of the Company’s shareholders by special resolution, being a resolution passed by at least 2/3 majority of the votes cast on the resolution.

Retirement and non-retirement of directors under an age limit requirement.

There are no such provisions applicable to the Company under the Articles or the Companies Law.

Number of shares required for a director’s qualification.

Under the Articles, the directors are not required to hold any shares as qualification for service on the board.

Place of Incorporation and Purpose

The Company was incorporated, effective February 5, 1992, by the amalgamation of three predecessor companies. It was registered in terms of the Canada Business Corporations ~~Act (the “CBCA”).~~Act. The company re-domiciled to Jersey, Channel Islands, effective March 19, 2016 through ~~a process called Continuance.~~the Continuance process. The Continuance had no appreciable effect on the Company’s listing in Toronto, the admission of its depositary interests to trading on AIM in London or the trading facility on the OTCQX (from July 27, 2017 the OTCQX trading ceased and shares commenced trading on NYSE American) and the Company’s securities continued to be traded on these listing and trading platforms after the Continuance process was completed.

Neither the Company’s memorandum of association nor the Articles stipulate any objects or purposes of the Company and no objects or purposes are required to be stated by the Companies Law.

Articles of Association

At a special meeting of shareholders held on February 18, 2016, Caledonia’s shareholders voted in favor of a resolution to approve the Continuance. This resolution, inter alia, included provisions to replace Caledonia’s by-laws with new articles of association (the “Articles ~~of Association~~”). The Articles ~~of Association~~ do not place any restrictions on the Company’s business.

The holders of the shares are entitled to one vote per share at all meetings of the shareholders of the Company. The holders of shares are also entitled to dividends, if and when declared, and the distribution of the residual assets of the Company in the event of a liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company. The Company's shares do not have pre-emptive rights to purchase additional shares.

No preference shares are currently issued and outstanding. Preference shares may be issued from time to time in one or more series composed of such number of shares with such preference, deferred or other special rights, privileges, restrictions and conditions as specified in the Articles ~~of Association~~ or as fixed before such issuance by a resolution passed by the directors and confirmed and declared by shareholders by a special resolution. The preference shares shall be entitled to preference over shares in respect of the payment of dividends and shall have priority over ~~the Shares~~other shares in the event of a distribution of residual assets of the Company in the event of a liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company. ~~Please see Exhibit 1.1 for details in respect of the rights, privileges, restrictions and conditions attaching to the shares and preference shares.~~ The rights attaching to the shares or the preference shares can only be modified by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the votes cast at a meeting of the relevant shareholders called for that purpose.

Meetings of Shareholders

The Articles ~~of Association requires~~require the Company to call an annual general meeting of shareholders within 13 months after holding the last preceding annual general meeting and permits the Company to call any other meeting of shareholders at any time. The Company is required to mail a notice of meeting and management information circular to registered shareholders not less than 21 clear days and not more than 60 days prior to the date of any annual or other general meeting of shareholders. These materials must also be filed with Canadian securities regulatory authorities. The Articles ~~of Association~~ provide that a quorum of two shareholders in person or represented by proxy holding or representing by proxy not less than 5% of the Company’s issued shares carrying the right to vote at the meeting is required to transact business at a general meeting. Shareholders, and their duly appointed proxies and corporate representatives, as well as the Company's auditors, are entitled to be admitted to the Company's annual and other general meetings of shareholders.

Limitations on the Right to Own Securities

There are no limitations on the rights to own securities in the Company.

Limitations on Restructuring

There is no provision in the Articles ~~of Association~~ that would have the effect of placing any limitations on any corporate restructuring in addition to what would otherwise be required by applicable law.

Disclosure of Share Ownership

The Articles ~~of Association~~ permit the Company to give a disclosure notice to any person that the Company has reasonable cause to believe is/was interested in the Company’s shares within the preceding three years; such notice may require the person to inform the Company whether that person holds/has held an interest in the Company’s shares. The Articles ~~of Association~~ also incorporate by reference certain of the disclosure guidance and transparency rules (“DTR”) published by the UK's Financial Conduct ~~Authority (“FCA”).~~Authority. The DTR include, inter alia, a requirement that a shareholder must notify the Company of the percentage of its voting rights (held directly and indirectly) if the percentage of those voting rights reaches, exceeds or falls below 3%, of the Company’s issued voting securities and each 1% threshold above 3%.

Differences in Corporate Law between United States (Delaware) and Jersey, Channel Islands

Set forth below is a comparison of certain shareholder rights and corporate governance matters under Delaware law and Jersey law:

Corporate Law Issue

Delaware Law

Jersey Law

Special Meetings of Shareholders

Shareholders generally do not have the right to call meetings of shareholders unless that right is granted in the certificate of incorporation or by-laws. However, if a corporation fails to hold its annual meeting within a period of 30 days after the date designated for the annual meeting, or if no date has been designated for a period of 13 months after its last annual meeting, the Delaware Court of Chancery may order a meeting to be held upon the application of a shareholder.

Shareholders holding 10% or more of the company’s voting rights and entitled to vote at the relevant meeting may legally require directors to call a meeting of shareholders. Under the Articles, the percentage required to requisition a meeting is reduced to 5%.

The Jersey Financial Services Commission, or JFSC, may, at the request of any officer, secretary or shareholder, call or direct the calling of an annual general meeting. Failure to call an annual general meeting in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Law is a criminal offense on the part of a Jersey company and its directors and secretary.

Interested Director Transactions

Interested director transactions are permissible and may not be legally voided if:

• either a majority of disinterested directors, or a majority in interest of holders of shares of the corporation’s capital stock entitled to vote upon the matter, approves the transaction upon disclosure of all material facts; or

• the transaction is determined to have been fair as to the corporation as of the time it is authorized, approved or ratified by the board of directors, a committee thereof or the shareholders.

An interested director must disclose to the company the nature and extent of any interest in a transaction with the company, or one of its subsidiaries, which to a material extent conflicts or may conflict with the interests of the company and of which the director is aware. Failure to disclose an interest entitles the company or a shareholder to apply to the court for an order setting aside the transaction concerned and directing that the director account to the company for any profit.

Although it may still order that a director account for any profit, a court will not set aside a transaction unless it is satisfied that the interests of third parties who have acted in good faith would not thereby be unfairly prejudiced and the transaction was not reasonable and fair in the interests of the company at the time it was entered into.

The Articles set out a limited number of transactions and matters in which a director may be interested and in which he may vote and be counted in the quorum in relation to a resolution on the matter.

Cumulative Voting

The certificate of incorporation of a Delaware corporation may provide that shareholders of any class or classes or of any series may vote cumulatively either at all elections or at elections under specified circumstances.

There are no provisions in the Companies Law relating to cumulative voting.

Approval of Corporate Matters by Written Consent

Unless otherwise specified in a corporation’s certificate of incorporation, shareholders may take action permitted to be taken at an annual or special meeting, without a meeting, notice or a vote, if consents, in writing, setting forth the action, are signed by shareholders with not less than the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to authorize the action at a meeting. All consents must be dated and are only effective if the requisite signatures are collected within 60 days of the earliest dated consent delivered.

If permitted by the articles of association of a company, a written consent signed and passed by the specified majority of members may affect any matter that otherwise may be brought before a shareholders’ meeting, except for the removal of a company’s auditors. Such consent shall be deemed effective when the instrument, or the last of several instruments, is signed by the specified majority of members or on such later date as is specified in the resolution.

The Articles do not contain provisions regarding shareholder resolutions in writing.

Business Combinations

With certain exceptions, a merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of the assets of a Delaware corporation must be approved by the board of directors and a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote thereon.

A sale or disposal of all or substantially all the assets of a Jersey company must be approved by the board of directors and, only if the articles of association of the company require, by the shareholders in general meeting. A merger involving a Jersey company must be generally documented in a merger agreement which must be approved by special resolution of that company.

Limitations on Director’s Liability and Indemnification of Directors and Officers

A Delaware corporation may indemnify a director or officer of the corporation against expenses (including attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred in defense of an action, suit or proceeding by reason of his or her position if (i) the director or officer acted in good faith and in a manner he or she reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation and (ii) with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, the director or officer had no reasonable cause to believe his or her conduct was unlawful.

The Companies Law does not contain any provision permitting Jersey companies to limit the liabilities of directors for breach of fiduciary duty.

However, a Jersey company may exempt from liability, and indemnify directors and officers, for liabilities:

• incurred in defending any civil or criminal legal proceedings where:

- the person is either acquitted or receives a judgment in their favor;

- where the proceedings are discontinued other than by reason of such person (or someone on their behalf) giving some benefit or suffering some detriment; or

- where the proceedings are settled on terms that such person (or someone on their behalf) gives some benefit or suffers some detriment but in the opinion of a majority of the disinterested directors, the person was substantially successful on the merits in the person’s resistance to the proceedings;

• incurred to anyone other than to the company if the person acted in good faith with a view to the best interests of the company;

• incurred in connection with an application made to the court for relief from liability for negligence, default, breach of duty or breach of trust under Article 212 of the Companies Law in which relief is granted to the person by the court; or

• incurred in a case in which the company normally maintains insurance for persons other than directors.

Appraisal Rights

A shareholder of a Delaware corporation participating in certain major corporate transactions may, under certain circumstances, be entitled to appraisal rights under which the shareholder may receive cash in the amount of the fair value of the shares held by that shareholder (as determined by a court) in lieu of the consideration the shareholder would otherwise receive in the transaction.

There are no appraisal rights under the Companies Law but the Articles include dissent rights of shareholders, based on Canadian law, whereby shareholders who dissent to certain transactions of the Company may apply to have the Company buy their shares for fair value.

Shareholder Suits

Class actions and derivative actions generally are available to the shareholders of a Delaware corporation for, among other things, breach of fiduciary duty, corporate waste and actions not taken in accordance with applicable law. In such actions, the court has discretion to permit the winning party to recover attorneys’ fees incurred in connection with such action.

Under Article 141 of the Companies Law, a shareholder may apply to court for relief on the ground that the conduct of a company’s affairs, including a proposed or actual act or omission by a company, is “unfairly prejudicial” to the interests of shareholders generally or of some part of shareholders, including at least the shareholder making the application.

There may also be customary law personal actions available to shareholders. Under Article 143 of the Companies Law (which sets out the types of relief a court may grant in relation to an action brought under Article 141 of the Companies Law), the court may make an order regulating the affairs of a company, requiring a company to refrain from doing or continuing to do an act complained of, authorizing civil proceedings and providing for the purchase of shares by a company or by any of its other shareholders.

Inspection of Books and Records

All shareholders of a Delaware corporation have the right, upon written demand, to inspect or obtain copies of the corporation’s shares ledger and its other books and records for any purpose reasonably related to such person’s interest as a shareholder.

The register of shareholders and books containing the minutes of general meetings or of meetings of any class of shareholders of a Jersey company must during business hours be open to the inspection of a shareholder of the company without charge. The register of directors and secretaries must during business hours (subject to such reasonable restrictions as the company may by its articles of association or in general meeting impose, but so that not less than two hours in each business day be allowed for inspection) be open to the inspection of a shareholder or director of the company without charge.

Amendments to Charter

Amendments to the certificate of incorporation of a Delaware corporation require the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote thereon or such greater vote as is provided for in the certificate of incorporation. A provision in the certificate of incorporation requiring the vote of a greater number or proportion of the directors or of the holders of any class of shares than is required by Delaware corporate law may not be amended, altered or repealed except by such greater vote.

The memorandum of association and the articles of association of a Jersey company may only be amended by special resolution (being a two-thirds majority if the articles of association of the company do not specify a greater majority) passed by shareholders in general meeting or by written resolution signed by all the shareholders entitled to vote.

Material Contracts

We enter into various contracts in the normal course of business. ~~However, there are no~~On November 6, 2018, the Company announced that it had entered into a sale agreement with Fremiro to purchase Femiro’s 15% shareholding in Blanket for a gross consideration of $16.7 million to be settled through a combination of the cancellation of the loan between the two entities which stood at $11.5 million as at June 30, 2018 and the issue of 727,266 new shares in Caledonia at an issue price of $7.15 per share. On January 20, 2020 the transaction was concluded, and Caledonia now holds an indirect 64% shareholding in Blanket and Fremiro holds approximately 6.3% of Caledonia’s diluted equity.

As stated under Item 4.A subheading “Eersteling Gold Mining Company Limited”, On May 31, 2018, the Group entered into an amended share sale agreement with SH Minerals to sell the shares and claims of Eersteling, a South African subsidiary previously consolidated as part of the Group, that has been on care and maintenance since 1997. The amended share sale agreement allowed for a purchase price of $3 million which would be settled by three payments of $1 million payable on the completion date, 12 and 18 months after the completion date. On January 31, 2019 all suspensive conditions for the sale were met and the Group transferred the registered and beneficial ownership of Eersteling to SH Minerals. During 2019, the ZAR equivalent of $1 million was received and the ZAR equivalent of approximately $0.9 million was received post year-end as payment towards the next instalment of the purchase price with the remainder of that instalment expected to be received shortly. The payment received in February 2019 effectively transferred the registered and beneficial ownership of Eersteling to SH Minerals and the Group relinquished control.

The material contracts ~~outside of the normal course of business to report in this Annual Report.~~

above are disclosed as Exhibit 4.5 and 4.8 under Item 19.

Exchange Controls

There are no governmental laws, decrees or regulations existing in Jersey, ~~(where Caledonia is incorporated),~~Channel Islands, which restrict the export or import of capital, or the remittance of dividends, interest or other payments to non-resident holders of Caledonia's securities, nor does Jersey, Channel Islands have foreign exchange currency controls. Exchange control approvals from the RBZ and the Reserve Bank of South Africa are required on the flow of funds in and out of Zimbabwe and South Africa; Caledonia ~~has not encountered difficulty in obtaining all~~obtained the necessary approvals from the RBZ and the Reserve Bank of ~~its required approvals.~~

South Africa to transfer foreign currency during 2019.

Taxation

Certain United States Federal Income Tax Considerations

The following is a general summary of certain material U.S. federal income tax considerations applicable to a U.S. Holder (as defined below) arising from and relating to the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of shares.

This summary is for general information purposes only and does not purport to be a complete analysis or listing of all potential U.S. federal income tax considerations that may apply to a U.S. Holder arising from and relating to the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of shares. In addition, this summary does not take into account the individual facts and circumstances of any particular U.S. Holder that may affect the U.S. federal income tax consequences to such U.S. Holder, including without limitation specific tax consequences to a U.S. Holder under an applicable tax treaty. Accordingly, this summary is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, legal or U.S. federal income tax advice with respect to any U.S. Holder. This summary does not address the U.S. federal net investment income, U.S. federal alternative minimum, U.S. federal estate and gift, U.S. state and local, and foreign tax consequences to U.S. Holders of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of shares. In addition, except as specifically set forth below, this summary does not discuss applicable tax reporting requirements. Each prospective U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal, U.S. federal net investment income, U.S. federal alternative minimum, U.S. federal estate and gift, U.S. state and local, and foreign tax consequences relating to the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of shares.

No legal opinion from U.S. legal counsel or ruling from the Internal Revenue Service (the ~~“IRS”~~“IRS”) has been requested, or will be obtained, regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of shares. This summary is not binding on the IRS, and the IRS is not precluded from taking a position that is different from, and contrary to, the positions taken in this summary. In addition, because the authorities on which this summary are based are subject to various interpretations, the IRS and the U.S. courts could disagree with one or more of the conclusions described in this summary.

Scope of this Summary

Authorities

This summary is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), Treasury Regulations (whether final, temporary, or proposed), published rulings of the IRS, published administrative positions of the IRS, and U.S. court decisions that are applicable and, in each case, as in effect and available, as of the date of this document. Any of the authorities on which this summary is based could be changed in a material and adverse manner at any time, and any such change could be applied on a retroactive or prospective basis which could affect the U.S. federal income tax considerations described in this summary. This summary does not discuss the potential effects, whether adverse or beneficial, of any proposed legislation.

U.S. Holders

For purposes of this summary, the term ~~"U.S. Holder"~~"U.S. Holder" means a beneficial owner of shares that is for U.S. federal income tax purposes:

·•	an individual who is a citizen or resident of the U.S.;

·•	a corporation (or other entity taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) organized under the laws of the U.S., any state thereof or the District of Columbia;

·•	an estate whose income is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source; or

·•	a trust that (1) is subject to the primary supervision of a court within the U.S. and the control of one or more U.S. persons for all substantial decisions or (2) has a valid election in effect under applicable Treasury Regulations to be treated as a U.S. person.

U.S. Holders Subject to Special U.S. Federal Income Tax Rules Not Addressed

This summary does not address the U.S. federal income tax considerations applicable to U.S. Holders that are subject to special provisions under the Code, including, but not limited to, the following U.S. Holders that: (a) are tax-exempt organizations, qualified retirement plans, individual retirement accounts, or other tax-deferred accounts; (b) are financial institutions, underwriters, insurance companies, real estate investment trusts, or regulated investment companies; (c) are broker-dealers, dealers, or traders in securities or currencies that elect to apply a mark-to-market accounting method; (d) have a “functional currency” other than the USD; (e) own shares as part of a straddle, hedging transaction, conversion transaction, constructive sale, or other ~~arrangement involving more than one position;~~integrated transaction; (f) acquired shares in connection with the exercise of employee stock options or otherwise as compensation for services; (g) hold shares other than as a capital asset within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code (generally, property held for investment purposes); or (h) own, have owned or will own (directly, indirectly, or by attribution) 10% or more of the total combined voting power or value of the outstanding shares of the ~~Company. This summary also does not address the U.S. federal income tax considerations applicable to U.S. Holders who are: (a)~~Company; (i) U.S. expatriates or former long-term residents of the U.S.~~; (b) persons that have been,~~, or (j) are ~~or will be a resident or deemed~~subject to ~~be a resident in Canada for purposes of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the “Tax Act”); (c) persons that use or hold, will use or hold, or that are or will be deemed~~special tax accounting rules with respect to use or hold shares in connection with carrying on a business in Canada; (d) persons whose shares constitute “taxable Canadian property” under the Tax Act; or (e) persons that have a permanent establishment in Canada for the purposes of the Canada-U.S. Tax Convention.shares. U.S. Holders that are subject to special provisions under the Code, including, but not limited to, U.S. Holders described immediately above, should consult their own tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal, U.S. federal net investment income, U.S. federal alternative minimum, U.S. federal estate and gift, U.S. state and local, and foreign tax consequences relating to the acquisition, ownership and disposition of shares.

If an entity or arrangement that is classified as a partnership (or other “pass-through” entity) for U.S. federal income tax purposes holds shares, the U.S. federal income tax consequences to such entity and the partners (or other owners) of such entity generally will depend on the activities of the entity and the status of such partners (or owners). This summary does not address the tax consequences to any such owner. Partners (or other owners) of entities or arrangements that are classified as partnerships or as “pass-through” entities for U.S. federal income tax purposes should consult their own tax advisors regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences arising from and relating to the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of shares.

Ownership and Disposition of shares

The following discussion is subject to the rules described below under the heading “Passive Foreign Investment Company ~~Rules.”~~Rules”.

Taxation of Distributions

A U.S. Holder that receives a distribution, including a constructive distribution, with respect to a share will be required to include the amount of such distribution in gross income as a dividend (without reduction for any foreign income tax withheld from such distribution) to the extent of the current or accumulated “earnings and profits” of the Company, as computed for U.S. federal income tax purposes. To the extent that a distribution exceeds the current and accumulated “earnings and profits” of the Company, such distribution will be treated first as a tax-free return of capital to the extent of a U.S. Holder's tax basis in the shares and thereafter as gain from the sale or exchange of such shares (see “Sale or Other Taxable Disposition of shares” below). However, the Company may not maintain the calculations of its earnings and profits in accordance with U.S. federal income tax principles, and each U.S. Holder may have to assume that any distribution by the Company with respect to the shares will constitute ordinary dividend income. Dividends received on shares by corporate U.S. Holders generally will not be eligible for the “dividends received deduction”. Subject to applicable limitations and provided the ~~Company is eligible for the benefits of the Canada-U.S. Tax Convention, or the~~ shares are readily tradable on a United States securities market dividends paid by the Company to non-corporate U.S. Holders, including individuals, generally will be eligible for the preferential tax rates applicable to long-term capital gains for dividends, provided certain holding period and other conditions are satisfied, including that the Company not be classified as a PFIC (as defined below) in the tax year of distribution or in the preceding tax year. The dividend rules are complex, and each U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor regarding the application of such rules.

Sale or Other Taxable Disposition of ~~shares~~Shares

A U.S. Holder will generally recognize gain or loss on the sale or other taxable disposition of shares in an amount equal to the difference, if any, between (a) the amount of cash plus the fair market value of any property received and (b) such U.S. Holder’s tax basis in such shares sold or otherwise disposed of. Any such gain or loss generally will be capital gain or loss, which will be long-term capital gain or loss if, at the time of the sale or other disposition, such shares are held for more than one year.

Preferential tax rates apply to long-term capital gains of a U.S. Holder that is an individual, estate, or trust. There are currently no preferential tax rates for long-term capital gains of a U.S. Holder that is a corporation. Deductions for capital losses are subject to significant limitations under the Code.

Passive Foreign Investment Company (“PFIC”) Rules

If the Company were to constitute a PFIC for any year during a U.S. Holder’s holding period, then certain potentially adverse rules would affect the U.S. federal income tax consequences to a U.S. Holder resulting from the acquisition, ownership and disposition of shares. The Company believes that it was not a PFIC for the tax year ended December 31, ~~2016.~~2019. No opinion of legal counsel or ruling from the IRS concerning the status of the Company as a PFIC has been obtained or is currently planned to be requested. However, PFIC classification is fundamentally factual in nature, generally cannot be determined until the close of the tax year in question and is determined annually. Additionally, the analysis depends, in part, on the application of complex U.S. federal income tax rules, which are subject to differing interpretations. Consequently, there can be no assurance that the Company has never been and will not become a PFIC for any tax year during which U.S. Holders hold shares.

In addition, in any year in which the Company is classified as a PFIC, a U.S. Holder will be required to file an annual report with the IRS containing such information as Treasury Regulations and/or other IRS guidance may require. A failure to satisfy such reporting requirements may result in an extension of the time period during which the IRS can assess a tax. U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the requirements of filing such information returns under these rules, including the requirement to file an IRS Form ~~8621.~~

8621 annually.

The Company generally will be a PFIC under Section 1297 of the Code if, after the application of certain “look-through” rules with respect to subsidiaries in which the Company holds at least 25% of the value of such subsidiary, for a tax year, (a) 75% or more of the gross income of the Company for such tax year is passive income (the “income test”) or (b) 50% or more of the value of the Company’s assets either produce passive income or are held for the production of passive income (the “asset test”), based on the quarterly average of the fair market value of such assets. “Gross income” generally includes all sales revenues less the cost of goods sold, plus income from investments and ~~from~~ incidental or outside operations or sources, and “passive income” generally includes, for example, dividends, interest, certain rents and royalties, certain gains from the sale of stock and securities, and certain gains from commodities transactions. Active business gains arising from the sale of commodities generally are excluded from passive income if substantially all ~~(85% or more)~~ of a foreign corporation’s commodities are stock in trade or inventory, depreciable property used in a trade or business or supplies regularly used or consumed in the ordinary course of its trade or business, and certain other requirements are satisfied.

If the Company were a PFIC in any tax year during which a U.S. Holder held shares, such holder generally would be subject to special rules with respect to “excess distributions” made by the Company on the shares and with respect to gain from the disposition of shares. An “excess distribution” generally is defined as the excess of distributions with respect to the shares received by a U.S Holder in any tax year over 125% of the average annual distributions such U.S. Holder has received from the Company during the shorter of the three preceding tax years, or such U.S. Holder’s holding period for the shares. Generally, a U.S. Holder would be required to allocate any excess distribution or gain from the disposition of the shares ratably over its holding period for the shares. Such amounts allocated to the year of the disposition or excess distribution would be taxed as ordinary income, and amounts allocated to prior tax years would be taxed as ordinary income at the highest tax rate in effect for each such year and an interest charge at a rate applicable to underpayments of tax would apply.

While there are U.S. federal income tax elections that sometimes can be made to mitigate these adverse tax consequences (including the ~~“QEF Election”~~“QEF Election” under Section 1295 of the Code and the ~~“Mark-to-Market Election”~~“Mark-to-Market Election” under Section 1296 of the Code), such elections are available in limited circumstances and must be made in a timely manner.

U.S. Holders should be aware that, for each tax year, if any, that the Company is a PFIC, the Company can provide no assurances that it will satisfy the ~~record keeping~~record-keeping requirements of a PFIC, or that it will make available to U.S. Holders the information such U.S. Holders require to make a QEF ~~Election~~election with respect to the Company or any subsidiary that also is classified as a PFIC.

Certain additional adverse rules may apply with respect to a U.S. Holder if the Company is a PFIC, regardless of whether the U.S. Holder makes a QEF Election. These rules include special rules that apply to the amount of foreign tax credit that a U.S. Holder may claim on a distribution from a PFIC. Subject to these special rules, foreign taxes paid with respect to any distribution in respect of stock in a PFIC are generally eligible for the foreign tax credit. U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the potential application of the PFIC rules to the ownership and disposition of shares, and the availability of certain U.S. tax elections under the PFIC rules.

Additional Considerations

~~Additional Tax on Passive Income~~

Certain individuals, estates and trusts whose income exceeds certain thresholds will be required to pay a 3.8% surtax on “net investment income” including, among other things, dividends and net gain from disposition of property (other than property held in certain trades or businesses). Special rules apply to PFICs. U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the effect, if any, of this tax on their ownership and disposition of shares.

Receipt of Foreign Currency

The amount of any distribution paid to a U.S. Holder in foreign currency, or payment received on the sale, exchange or other taxable disposition of shares, generally will be equal to the USD value of such foreign currency based on the exchange rate applicable on the date of receipt (regardless of whether such foreign currency is converted into USD at that time). A U.S. Holder will have a basis in the foreign currency equal to its USD value on the date of receipt. Any U.S. Holder who converts or otherwise disposes of the foreign currency after the date of receipt may have a foreign currency exchange gain or loss that would be treated as ordinary income or loss, and generally will be U.S. source income or loss for foreign tax credit purposes. Different rules apply to U.S. Holders who use the accrual method with respect to foreign currency received upon the sale, exchange or other taxable disposition of the shares. Each U.S. Holder should consult its own U.S. tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of receiving, owning, and disposing of foreign currency.

Foreign Tax Credit

Subject to the PFIC rules discussed above, a U.S. Holder that pays (whether directly or through withholding) ~~Canadian~~foreign income tax with respect to dividends paid on the shares generally will be entitled, at the election of such U.S. Holder, to receive either a deduction or a credit for such ~~Canadian~~foreign income tax. Generally, a credit will reduce a U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability on a dollar-for-dollar basis, whereas a deduction will reduce a U.S. Holder’s income subject to U.S. federal income tax. This election is made on a year-by-year basis and applies to all foreign taxes paid (whether directly or through withholding) by a U.S. Holder during a year.

Complex limitations apply to the foreign tax credit, including the general limitation that the credit cannot exceed the proportionate share of a U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability that such U.S. Holder’s “foreign source” taxable income bears to such U.S. Holder’s worldwide taxable income. In applying this limitation, a U.S. Holder’s various items of income and deduction must be classified, under complex rules, as either “foreign source” or “U.S. source.” Generally, dividends paid by a foreign corporation should be treated as foreign source for this purpose, and gains recognized on the sale of stock of a foreign corporation by a U.S. Holder should be treated as U.S. source for this purpose, except as otherwise provided in an applicable income tax treaty, and if an election is properly made under the Code. However, the amount of a distribution with respect to the shares that is treated as a “dividend” may be lower for U.S. federal income tax purposes than it is for Canadian federal income tax purposes, resulting in a reduced foreign tax credit allowance to a U.S. Holder. In addition, this limitation is calculated separately with respect to specific categories of income. The foreign tax credit rules are complex and ~~each~~involve the application of rules that depend on a U.S. Holder’s particular circumstances. Each U.S. Holder should consult its own U.S. tax advisor regarding the foreign tax credit rules.

Backup Withholding and Information Reporting

Under U.S. federal income tax law and Treasury Regulations, certain categories of U.S. Holders must file information returns with respect to their investment in, or involvement in, a foreign corporation. For example, U.S. return disclosure obligations (and related penalties) are imposed on individuals who are U.S. Holders that hold certain specified foreign financial assets in excess of certain threshold amounts. The definition of specified foreign financial assets includes not only financial accounts maintained in foreign financial institutions, but also, unless held in accounts maintained by a financial institution, any stock or security issued by a non-U.S. person, any financial instrument or contract held for investment that has an issuer or counterparty other than a U.S. person and any interest in a foreign entity. U.S. Holders may be subject to these reporting requirements unless their shares are held in an account at certain financial institutions. Penalties for failure to file certain of these information returns are substantial. U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the requirements of filing information returns, including the requirement to file an IRS Form 8938.

Payments made within the U.S. or by a U.S. payor or U.S. middleman, of dividends on, and proceeds arising from the sale or other taxable disposition of, shares will generally be subject to information reporting and backup withholding tax, at the rate of ~~28%~~24%, if a U.S. Holder (a) fails to furnish such U.S. Holder’s correct U.S. taxpayer identification number (generally on Form W-9), (b) furnishes an incorrect U.S. taxpayer identification number, (c) is notified by the IRS that such U.S. Holder has previously failed to properly report items subject to backup withholding tax, or (d) fails to certify, under penalty of perjury, that such U.S. Holder has furnished its correct U.S. taxpayer identification number and that the IRS has not notified such U.S. Holder that it is subject to backup withholding tax. However, certain exempt persons generally are excluded from these information reporting and backup withholding rules. Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Any amounts withheld under the U.S. backup withholding tax rules will be allowed as a credit against a U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability, if any, or will be refunded, if such U.S. Holder furnishes required information to the IRS in a timely manner.

The discussion of reporting requirements set forth above is not intended to constitute a complete description of all reporting requirements that may apply to a U.S. Holder. A failure to satisfy certain reporting requirements may result in an extension of the time period during which the IRS can assess a tax, and under certain circumstances, such an extension may apply to assessments of amounts unrelated to any unsatisfied reporting requirement. Each U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor regarding the information reporting and backup withholding rules.

Dividends and Paying Agents

Not ~~Applicable.~~

applicable.

Statement by Experts

Not ~~Applicable.~~

applicable.

Documents on Display

Any statement in this Annual Report about any of our contracts or other documents is not necessarily complete. If the contract or document is filed as an exhibit to this Annual Report, the contract or document is deemed to modify the description contained in this Annual Report. Readers must review the exhibits themselves for a complete description of the contract or document.

Readers may review a copy of our filings with the SEC, including exhibits and schedules filed with it, at the SEC's public reference facilities at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Readers may call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference rooms. The SEC maintains a website (http://www.sec.gov) that contains reports, submissions and other information regarding registrants that file electronically with the SEC. We have only recently become subject to the requirement to file electronically through the EDGAR system most of our securities documents, including registration statements under the Securities Act and registration statements, reports and other documents under the Exchange Act.

~~We also file certain reports with the Canadian Securities Administrators that you may obtain through access of the SEDAR website, www.sedar.com.~~

Readers may read and copy any reports, statements or other information that we file with the SEC at the address indicated above and may also access them electronically at the website set forth above. These SEC filings are also available to the public from commercial document retrieval services.

We are required to file reports and other information with the SEC under the Exchange Act. Reports and other information filed by us with the SEC may be inspected and copied at the ~~SEC's~~SEC’s public reference facilities described above. ~~As a foreign private issuer, we are exempt from~~

We also file certain reports with the rules under the Exchange Act prescribing the furnishing and content of proxy statements and our officers, directors and principal shareholders are exempt from the reporting and short-swing profit recovery provisions contained in section 16Canadian Securities Administrators that you may obtain through access of the ~~Exchange Act. Under the Exchange Act, as a foreign private issuer, we are not required to publish financial statements as frequently or as promptly as United States companies.~~

SEDAR website, www.sedar.com.

Copies of our material contracts are kept at our ~~principal executive~~registered office.

Subsidiary Information

Not ~~Applicable.~~

applicable.

ITEM 11 - QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The Company is exposed in varying degrees to a variety of financial instrument related risks by virtue of its activities. The overall financial risk management program focuses on preservation of capital and protecting current and future Company assets and cash flows by reducing exposure to risks posed by the uncertainties and volatilities of financial markets.

The board of directors of the Company has a responsibility to ensure that an adequate financial risk management policy is established and to approve the policy. The Company’s Audit Committee oversees management’s compliance with the Company’s financial risk management policy.

The fair value of the Company’s financial instruments approximates their carrying value unless otherwise noted. The types of risk exposure and the way in which such exposures are managed are as follows:

Currency Risk

~~Caledonia’s group of companies (the “~~

The Group”) is exposed to currency risk to the extent that there is a mismatch between the currency that it transacts in and the functional currency. The results of the Group’s operations are subject to currency transaction risk and currency translation risk. The operating results and financial position of the Group are reported in USD in the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The availability of foreign exchange and the fluctuation of the USD in relation to other currencies that entities, within the Group, may transact in will consequently have an impact upon the profitability of the Group and may also affect the value of the Group’s assets and liabilities. As noted below, the Group has certain financial assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of the Company. ~~The Group does not use any derivative instruments to reduce its foreign currency risks.~~To reduce exposure to currency transaction risk, the Group ~~predominantly maintains~~regularly reviews the currency in which it spends its cash to identify and avoid specific expenditures in currencies that experience inflationary pressures. Further the Group aims to maintain cash and cash equivalents in USD to avoid foreign exchange exposure and to meet ~~short~~‐~~term~~short-term liquidity requirements.

~~Sensitivity analysis~~

Sensitivity Analysis

As a result of the Group’s monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies which is different to the functional currency of the underlying entities, the profit or loss and equity in the underlying entities could be affected by movements between the functional currency and the foreign currency. The table below indicates ~~net~~consolidated monetary assets/(liabilities) in the Group that have a different functional currency and foreign currency. ~~Amounts are indicated before elimination of intergroup balances.~~

	2019 USD’000					2018 USD’000					2017 USD‘000
	Functional currency					Functional currency					Functional currency
	ZAR		USD			ZAR		USD			ZAR		USD
Cash and cash equivalents		57		4,176			57		8,147			57		601
Trade and other receivables		-		1,735			-		126			-		-
Trade and other payables		-		(179	)		-		(345	)		-		-
Term loan		-		(2,471	)		-		(5,960	)		-		-
Overdraft		-		(490	)		-		-			-		-
		57		2,771			57		1,968			57		601

2016
USD‘000

2015
USD‘000

2014
USD‘000

Functional currency Functional currency Functional currency
ZAR USD ZAR CAD ZAR CAD
Cash and cash equivalents 457 265 3,874 5,483 10,514 553
Trade and other payables - 43 - - - -
Intercompany balances^*
(30,552 ) (1,514 ) (27,650 ) 44,390 (30,320 ) 48,484
(30,095 ) (1,206 ) (23,776 ) 49,873 (19,806 ) 49,037

A reasonably possible strengthening or weakening of 5% of the various functional currencies against the foreign currencies would have the following equal or opposite effect on profit or loss before tax for the Group:

2016
USD‘000

2015
USD’000

2014
USD’000

Functional currency Functional currency Functional currency
ZAR USD ZAR CAD ZAR CAD
Cash and cash equivalents 23 13 194 274 526 28
Trade and other payables 2 - - - -
Intercompany balances^*
(1,527 ) (88 ) (1,382 ) 2,219 (1,516 ) 2,424

* These intercompany balances represent the exposure to foreign currency risk between functional currencies and foreign currencies at a subsidiary level. These balances eliminate on consolidation.

	2019 USD’000					2018 USD‘000					2017 USD’000
	Functional currency					Functional currency					Functional currency
	ZAR		USD			ZAR		USD			ZAR		USD
Cash and cash equivalents		3		199			3		388			3		30
Trade and other receivables		-		82			-		6			-		-
Trade and other payables		-		9			-		(16	)		-		-
Term loan		-		(117	)		-		(283	)		-		-
Overdraft		-		(23	)		-		-			-		-
		3		150			3		95			3		30

Interest Rate Risk

The Group's interest rate risk arises from loans and borrowings, overdraft facility and cash held. The loans and borrowings, overdraft facility and cash held have variable interest rate borrowings. ~~Variable rate~~Variable-rate borrowings expose the ~~group~~Group to cash flow interest rate risk. The Group has not entered into interest rate swap agreements.

The Group’s assets and (liabilities) exposed to interest rate fluctuations as at ~~year end is~~year-end are summarized as follows:

2016 2015 2014
Term loan (2,987) - -
Cash and cash equivalents 14,335 12,568 23,082
Overdraft - (1,688) -

	2019		2018	2017
Term loan	(2,471	)	5,960	(1,486	)
Cash and cash equivalents	9,383		11,187	12,756
Overdraft	(490	)	-	-

Interest rate risk arising is offset by available cash and cash equivalents. The table below ~~summarises~~summarizes the effect of a change in finance cost on the Group’s ~~total comprehensive income~~profit or loss and equity for the year, had the rates charged differed.

Sensitivity analysis – cash and cash equivalents

	2019			2018			2017

Increase in 100 basis points		94			111			128
Decrease in 100 basis points		(94	)		(111	)		(128	)

Sensitivity analysis – term loan ~~and bank overdraft~~

	2019			2018			2017

Increase in 100 basis points		(25	)		(60	)		(15	)
Decrease in 100 basis points		25			60			15

2016 2015 2014

Increase in 100 basis points 30 17 3
Decrease in 100 basis points (30) (17) (3)

Sensitivity analysis – overdraft

	2019			2018		2017

Increase in 100 basis points		(5	)		-		-
Decrease in 100 basis points		5			-		-

Concentration of Credit Risk

Credit risk is the risk of a financial loss to the Company if a debtor fails to meet its contractual obligation. From 2014, gold sales were made to Fidelity in Zimbabwe and the payment terms stipulated in the service delivery contract have been adhered to in all instances. Trade and other receivables are analysed in note 1520 to the Consolidated Financial Statements and include ~~$1.0~~$3.0 million ~~(2015: $ nil; 2014: $ Nil)~~(2018: $2.7 million; 2017: $1.4 million) due from Fidelity in respect of gold deliveries immediately prior to the close of business at the end of ~~2016~~2019 and ~~$1.9~~$1.8 million ~~(2015:~~(2018: $2.7 million; 2017: $2.9 million) due from the Zimbabwe ~~government~~Government in respect of VAT refunds. The amount due from Fidelity was paid in full after ~~year end;~~year-end; the outstanding balance at December 31, ~~2016~~2019 reflects a normal balance in the context of the timing of bullion shipments to Fidelity and payments from Fidelity for bullion received. The amount due in respect of the longer-outstanding VAT refunds were within the agreed terms.

Liquidity Risk

Liquidity risk is the risk that the Group will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they fall due. The Group manages its liquidity risk by ensuring that there is ~~sufficient~~enough cash to meet its likely cash requirements, after taking into account cash flows from operations and the Group’s holdings of cash and cash equivalents. The Group believes that these sources will be ~~sufficient~~enough to cover the anticipated cash requirements. Senior management is also actively involved in the review and approval of planned expenditures by regularly monitoring cash flows from operations and anticipated investing and financing activities.

~~Commodity~~F.

Market Risk – Gold Price ~~Risk~~

The value of the Company’s mineral ~~resource~~ properties is related to the price of gold and the outlook for these minerals. In addition, adverse changes in the price of certain key or high cost operating consumables can significantly impair the Company’s cash flows.

Gold prices historically have fluctuated widely and are affected by numerous factors outside of the Company's control, including, but not limited to, industrial and retail demand, central bank lending, forward sales by producers and speculators, levels of worldwide production, short-term changes in supply and demand because of speculative hedging activities, and macro-economic variables, and certain other factors related specifically to gold.

~~In February 2016, the~~

The Company entered into a 5-month hedge in respect of ~~15,000~~4,500 ounces of gold ~~over~~per month from February to June 2019 through the purchase of put options with a ~~period~~strike price of ~~6 months.~~$1,250 per ounce. The ~~hedge protected the Company if the~~ gold price ~~fell~~never went below ~~$1,050~~$1,250 per ounce and ~~gave~~ the hedge was concluded at a cost of $324,000.

The Company ~~full participation if~~entered a new hedge in November 2019 at a cost of $379,000. The new hedge was in the form of put options in respect of 4,600 ounces of gold per month for the period January to June 2020 exercisable at a strike price of ~~gold exceeded $1,079~~$1,400 per ounce. ~~The derivative financial instrument was~~At December 31, 2019 the mark-to-market valuation, that represents the fair value of the hedge, amounted to $102,000 (2018: Nil).

Both hedges were entered into by the Company for economic hedging purposes ~~and not~~to ensure enough cash availability for Blanket Mine’s capital investment plan, rather than as a speculative ~~investment and was closed out in August 2016.~~

investment. The ~~derivative contract resulted in a loss of $435,000 included in profit or loss. The Company settled the loss with the $435,000 margin call deposited at the inception~~total expense of the ~~hedge transaction. The Company is fully exposed~~derivative contracts amounted to $601,000 (2018: $360,000) for the ~~gold price as at December 31, 2016.~~

~~A 5% increase or decrease in the average realised gold price would have increased or decreased revenue by $3,100,000 (2015: $2,449,000; 2014:$2,664,000)~~

year.

ITEM 12 - DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES

Not ~~Applicable.~~

applicable.

PART II

ITEM 13 - DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARS AND DELINQUENCIES

~~Not Applicable.~~

There has not been a material default in the payment of principal, interest, a sinking or purchase fund installment, or any other material default not cured within thirty days, relating to indebtedness of the Company or any of its significant subsidiaries. There are no payments of dividends by the Company in arrears, nor has there been any other material delinquency relating to any class of preference shares of the Company.

ITEM 14 - MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS

A. to D.

None.

Use of Proceeds

Not ~~Applicable.~~

applicable.

ITEM 15 - CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

A.~~Disclosure Controls and Procedures~~

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, and assessed the design of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, ~~2016.~~2019. As required by Rule 13(a)-15 under the Exchange Act, in connection with this Annual Report on Form 20-F, under the direction of our ~~Chief Executive Officer~~CEO and ~~Chief Financial Officer,~~CFO, we have evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, ~~2016,~~2019, and we have concluded our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as at December 31, ~~2016.~~

B.~~Management’s annual report on internal control over financial reporting (“ICOFR”)~~

2019.

Management’s annual report on internal control over financial reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Internal control over financial reporting has been designed to provide reasonable assurance with respect to the reliability of financial reporting and the presentation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with IFRS. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within our Company have been detected.

As of the date of this filing, we have in place controls and procedures to maintain appropriate segregation of duties in our manual and ~~computer based~~computer-based business processes that we believe are appropriate for a company of our size and extent of business transactions. Under the supervision and with the participation of the CEO and CFO, management assessed the effectiveness of the ~~Company's~~Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, ~~2016.~~2019. In making their assessment, management used the control objectives established in the 2013 Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ~~("COSO"~~(“COSO”) framework. Based upon that assessment and those criteria, management concluded that the ~~Company's~~Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, ~~2016.~~

C.~~Attestation Report of registered public accounting firm~~

2019.

Attestation report of registered public accounting firm

This Annual Report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management's report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to (i) the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, which permits us to provide only management's report in this Annual Report; the Dodd-Frank Act permits a "non-accelerated filer" to provide only management's report on internal control over financial reporting in an Annual Report and omit an attestation report of the issuer's registered public accounting firm regarding management's report on internal control over financial reporting and (ii) as we qualify as an "emerging growth company" under section 3(a) of the Exchange Act (as amended by the JOBS Act, enacted on April 5, 2012), and are therefore exempt from the attestation requirement.

D.~~Changes in internal controls over financial reporting~~

Changes in internal controls over financial reporting.

There were no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of 17 CFR 240.13a-15 or 240.15d-15 that occurred during the period covered by this ~~annual report~~Annual Report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 16A - AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT

Caledonia’s board of directors has determined, as atof March 30, ~~2017~~2020, that the three members of its Audit Committee are considered independent as defined under NICanadian National Instrument 52-110 and as defined pursuant to Section 803 of the NYSE ~~MKT~~American LLC Company Guide (as such definition may be modified or supplemented) and considered to be financially literate as such terms are defined under Canadian National Instrument 52-110, ~~Audit Committees~~ and one of the members can be considered to be ~~an expert.~~a financial expert as defined in Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K under the Exchange Act. The financial expert serving on the Audit Committee is Mr. J. ~~Holtzhausen.~~Holtzhausen, whose experience is disclosed in this Annual Report under Item 6.A “Directors and Senior Management”. Messrs. J. Holtzhausen, J. Kelly and JJ. McGloin are all independent directors under the applicable rules.

The SEC has indicated that the designation of an audit committee financial expert does not make that person an "expert" for any purpose, impose any duties, obligations, or liability on that person that are greater than those imposed on members of the Audit Committee and board of directors who do not carry this designation, or affect the duties, obligations, or liabilities of any other member of the Audit Committee.

ITEM 16B - CODE OF ETHICS

On November 8, 2016 the registrant’s board of directors approved in principle, and the Company formally adopted on March 7, 2017, a revised code of business conduct, ethics and anti-bribery policy that applies to the registrant’s ~~Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer,~~directors, CEO, CFO, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, ~~(as well as many others).~~

and all other employees and contractors. The code was further revised and the most recent updated version was adopted on August 7, 2018.

The text of this code ~~has been posted~~is available on the Company’s website (www.caledoniamining.com/index.php/aboutus/corporate-governance).

The Company ~~website. (www.caledoniamining.com)~~

has not granted any waiver from the Code of Ethics to the CEO, CFO, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions during the fiscal year 2019.

ITEM 16C - PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

The following table sets forth the ~~audit service~~aggregate fees billed by our ~~current~~ external auditors, unless stated otherwise, for the years indicated:

2016⁽¹⁾

2015⁽¹⁾

2014⁽¹⁾
Audit fees 334,996 181,652 276,824
Audit – related fees - -
Tax fees ⁽²⁾
18,012 181950 56,414
All other fees 2,498 - -
TOTAL 355,506 363,602 333,238

~~Notes:~~

	⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾2019	⁽¹⁾⁽³⁾2018
Audit fees	176,415	157,849
Audit – related fees	-	-
Tax fees	-	-
All other fees	1,542	19,598
TOTAL	177,957	177,447

Notes:

⁽¹⁾

Prior to the start of the audit process, Caledonia’s Audit Committee receives an estimate of the costs from its auditors and reviews such costs for their reasonableness. After their review and pre-approval of the fees, the Audit Committee ~~recommend~~recommends to the board of directors whether to accept the estimated audit fees given by the auditors.

⁽²⁾

~~Tax~~Represents fees ~~were for assistance provided regarding international tax matters relating to a possible permanent establishment tax exposure and a tax transfer pricing review.~~billed by BDO South Africa Incorporated

⁽³⁾

Represents fees billed by KPMG Inc.

ITEM 16D - EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES

Not ~~Applicable.~~

applicable.

ITEM 16E - PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS

Not ~~Applicable.~~

applicable.

ITEM 16F - CHANGE IN REGISTRANT'S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT

~~Not applicable.~~

In 2018, the Audit Committee of the board of directors of the Company conducted a review of the Company’s audit requirements and, as a result of the review, the Audit Committee determined not to propose the reappointment of KPMG Inc. (“KPMG”) as the Company’s auditor at the annual general meeting (“AGM”) of the shareholders of the Company during 2018 (“2018 AGM”) and to propose BDO South Africa Incorporated (“BDO”) (formerly Grant Thornton Johannesburg Partnership) as the Company’s auditor until the next annual general meeting of shareholders.

On May 8, 2018, the board of directors of the Company approved the recommendation of the Audit Committee, and a resolution to appoint BDO as the Company’s auditor was proposed to be put to the shareholders at the 2018 AGM.

At the conclusion of the 2018 AGM held on June 27, 2018, KPMG was not re-appointed as the auditor of the Company. At the 2018 AGM and at the 2019 AGM held on May 8, 2019, the appointment and reappointment, respectively, of BDO as the auditor of the Company for the ensuing fiscal year was approved unanimously by way of a show of hands.

The report issued by KPMG for the year ended December 31, 2017 did not contain an adverse opinion nor a disclaimer opinion nor was qualified nor modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles.

There have been no disagreements with KPMG or BDO on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedures applied.

The disclosure required pursuant to this Item 16F was included in the Company’s Current Report on Form 6-K filed with the SEC on May 18, 2018, including Exhibits 99.1, 99.2 and 99.3, which are hereby incorporated by reference into this Annual Report.

ITEM 16G - CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Because our securities are ~~not~~ listed on NYSE American, being a national securities exchange in the United States, we are ~~not~~ subject to ~~exchange related~~the corporate governance requirements set out in the ~~United States. However, we~~NYSE American LLC Company Guide. We are also subject to a variety of corporate governance guidelines and requirements enacted by the jurisdictions and exchanges in which we operate our business and on which our securities are traded. We incorporate a mix of corporate governance best practices to ensure that our corporate governance complies in all material respects with the requirements of the jurisdictions in which we operate and the exchanges on which our securities are traded.

Section 110 of the NYSE American Company Guide permits NYSE American to consider the laws, customs and practices of foreign issuers, and to grant exemptions from NYSE American listing criteria based on these considerations. A company seeking relief under these provisions is required to provide a written certification from independent local counsel that the non-complying practice is not prohibited by home country law. A description of the significant ways in which the Company’s governance practices differ from those followed by domestic companies pursuant to NYSE American standards is as follows:

Shareholder Meeting Quorum Requirement: the NYSE American Company Guide specifies a quorum requirement of at least 33-1/3% of the shares issued and outstanding and entitled to vote for meetings of a listed company's shareholders. The Company's quorum requirements for shareholder meetings, as set forth in the Articles, are two members entitled to vote at the meeting present in person or by proxy together holding or representing by proxy not less than five percent of the issued shares of the Company. The Company's quorum requirement as set forth in the Articles is not prohibited by, and does not contravene, the Companies Law.

Proxy Delivery Requirement: the NYSE American requires the solicitation of proxies and delivery of proxy statements for all shareholder meetings and requires that these proxies be solicited pursuant to a proxy statement that conforms to SEC proxy rules. The Company is a “foreign private issuer” as defined in Rule 3b-4 under the Exchange Act, and the equity securities of the Company are accordingly exempt from the proxy rules set forth in Sections 14(a), 14(b), 14(c) and 14(f) of the Exchange Act. The Company complies with the applicable rules and regulations in Jersey.

In addition, the Company may from time-to-time seek relief from NYSE American corporate governance requirements on specific transactions under Section 110 of the NYSE American Company Guide by providing written certification from independent local counsel that the non-complying practice is not prohibited by our home country law, in which case, the Company shall make the disclosure of such transactions available on its website at http://www.caledoniamining.com. Information contained on the Company’s website is not part of this Form 20-F.

ITEM 16H - MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE

~~Not Applicable.~~

Pursuant to Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, issuers that are operators, or that have a subsidiary that is an operator, of a coal or other mine in the United States are required to disclose in their periodic reports filed with the SEC information regarding specified health and safety violations, orders and citations, related assessments and legal actions, and mining-related fatalities with respect to mining operations and properties in the United States that are subject to regulation by the Federal Mine Safety and Health Administration ("MSHA") under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the "Mine Act"). During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company had no mines in the United States that were subject to regulation by the MSHA under the Mine Act.

PART III

ITEM 17 - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

See Item 18.

ITEM 18 - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Consolidated Financial Statements and schedules appear on pages F-1 through ~~F-58~~F-75 of this Annual Report and are incorporated herein by reference. Our audited financial statements as prepared by our management and approved by the board of directors include:

~~Consolidated Statements of Profit or Loss and Other Comprehensive Income~~

~~Consolidated Statements of Financial Position~~

~~Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity~~

~~Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows~~

~~Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements~~

Consolidated Statements of Profit or Loss and Other Comprehensive Income

Consolidated Statements of Financial Position

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

All the above statements are available on the Company’s website at – www.caledoniamining.com or under the Company’s profile on the System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (“SEDAR”) at www.sedar.com

ITEM 19 – EXHIBITS

Financial Statements

Description		Page

Financial Statements and Notes		F1- ~~F58~~F75

Exhibit List

Exhibit No.	Name
1.1	Articles of Association ~~(incorporated~~(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the SEC on March 31, ~~2016)~~2016)
~~4.1~~ 2.1	Description of Registered Securities
4.1	OEICP (revised 2015) ~~(incorporated~~(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the SEC on March 31, ~~2015)~~2015)
4.2	Employment contracts/executive employment agreements
(~~8.1~~	~~List of Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc group entities~~
~~12.1~~	~~Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002~~
~~12.2~~	~~Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002~~
~~13.1~~	~~Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002~~
~~15.1~~	~~Independent Technical Report and PEA on the Blanket Mine(~~incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit ~~15.1~~4.2 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the SEC on March 31, ~~2015)~~2017)
~~15.2~~4.3	~~Property and Claims Information of Blanket Mine (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 15.2 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the SEC on March 31, 2015)~~
~~15.3~~	~~Shareholder Rights Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 15.3 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the SEC on March 31, 2015)~~
~~15.4~~	Share Subscription Agreements – Blanket Mine ~~(incorporated~~(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 15.4 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the SEC on March 31, ~~2015)~~2015)
4.4	Addendum to share subscription agreements – FREMIRO, GCSOT, NIEEF, BETS (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.4 of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the SEC on April 2, 2018)
4.5	Share Purchase Agreement by and between the Company and Fremiro, dated November 6, 2018 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.5 of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the SEC on March 28, 2019)
4.6	January 11, 2019 PSU award agreement and addendum example (incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 4.6 of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the SEC on March 28, 2019)
4.7	January 19, 2020 RSU and PSU award agreement example
4.8	Eersteling sale agreements (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.7 of the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the SEC on March 28, 2019)
4.9	Mining Lease
8.1	List of Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc group entities
12.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
12.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
13.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Exhibit No.

Name

13.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
15.1	Property and Claims Information of Blanket Mine (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 15.2 of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the SEC on March 31, 2015)
15.2	Notice of Change of Auditor (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of the Registrant’s Form 6-K filed with the SEC on May 18, 2018)
15.3	Letter from BDO South Africa Incorporated (formerly Grant Thornton Johannesburg Partnership) (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.2 of the Registrant’s Form 6-K filed with the SEC on May 18, 2018)
15.4	Letter from KPMG Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.3 of the Registrant’s Form 6-K filed with the SEC on March 18, 2018)
15.5	Consent of BDO South Africa Incorporated
15.6	Consent of KPMG Inc.
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

~~The~~

Shareholders and Board of Directors ~~and Shareholders~~

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

St Helier, Jersey Channel Islands

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated ~~statements of financial position~~balance sheets of Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc (the “Group”) as of December 31, ~~2016~~2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of profit and loss and other comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, ~~2015~~2019, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2019, in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Group’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Group’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Group is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Group’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

[s] BDO South Africa Inc.

We have served as the Group's auditor sinceyear2018.

Chartered Accountants(SA)

Registered Auditors

Wanderers Office Park

52 Corlett Drive

Illovo, 2196

March 30, 2020

F-1

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors
Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited, before the effects of the adjustments to retrospectively apply the changes in accounting described in notes 4 (c) and (d), the consolidated statements of profit or loss and other comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows of Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc (the Company) for ~~each of~~ the ~~years in the three‑~~year ~~period~~ ended December 31, ~~2016.~~ 2017, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). The 2017 consolidated financial statements before the effects of the adjustments described in notes 4 (c) and (d) are not presented herein. In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements, before the effects of the adjustments to retrospectively apply the changes in accounting described in notes 4 (c) and (d), present fairly, in all material respects, the financial performance of the Company and its cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2017, in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.

We were not engaged to audit, review, or apply any procedures to the adjustmentsto retrospectively apply the changes in accounting described innotes 4 (c) and (d) and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance about whether such adjustments are appropriate and have been properly applied. Those adjustments were audited by other auditors.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our ~~audits.~~

audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our ~~audits~~audit in accordance with the standards of the ~~Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).~~PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material ~~misstatement. An~~misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.Our audit ~~includes~~included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence ~~supporting~~regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. AnOur audit also ~~includes assessing~~included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial ~~statement presentation.~~statements. We believe that our ~~audits provide~~audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

We served as the Company’s auditor from 2013 to 2017.

[s] KPMG Inc

85 Empire Road

Parktown

Johannesburg

South Africa

March 29, 2018

F-2

~~In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of~~

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, and its consolidated financial performance and its consolidated cash flows for each of the years in the three‑year period ended December 31, 2016, in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.

~~(Signed) KPMG Inc.~~

~~85 Empire Road~~
~~Parktown~~
~~Johannesburg~~

~~South Africa~~
~~March 30, 2017~~

~~F-1~~

Consolidated statements of profit or loss and other comprehensive income
~~(In thousands~~

(In thousands of United States Dollars, unless indicated otherwise)
For the years ended December 31	Notes		2019		*2018		*2017
Revenue			75,826		68,399		69,762
Less: Royalties			(3,854	)	(3,426	)	(3,498	)
Production costs		9	(36,400	)	(39,315	)	(36,180	)
Depreciation		18	(4,434	)	(4,071	)	(3,763	)
Gross profit			31,138		21,587		26,321
Other income		10	2,274		7,101		2,594
Other expenses			(666	)	(336	)	(14	)
Impairment loss on trade receivables		11	-		-		(181	)
Administrative expenses		14	(5,637	)	(6,465	)	(5,911	)
Cash-settled share-based expense		27.1	(689	)	(315	)	(976	)
Equity-settled share-based expense		27.2	-		(14	)	(835	)
Net foreign exchange gain/(loss)		12	29,661		223		(380	)
Profit on sale of subsidiary		22.1	5,409		-		-
Gold hedge expense		16	(601	)	(360	)	-
Operating profit			60,889		21,421		20,618
Finance income		15	146		53		38
Finance cost		15	(344	)	(273	)	(69	)
Profit before tax			60,691		21,201		20,587
Tax expense		17	(10,290	)	(7,445	)	(8,691	)
Profit for the year			50,401		13,756		11,896
Other comprehensive income
Items that are or may be reclassified to profit or loss
Foreign currency translation differences of foreign operations			49		(676	)	373
Reversal of foreign currency translation differences on disposal of subsidiary		22.1	(2,109	)	-		-
Total comprehensive income for the year			48,341		13,080		12,269

* The Group initially applied IFRS 16 on January 1, 2019, using the modified retrospective approach. Under this approach, comparative information is not restated. There was no cumulative effect of ~~United States Dollars, unless indicated otherwise)~~initially applying IFRS 16 to recognise in retained earnings at the date of initial application.

F-3

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Consolidated statements of profit or loss and other comprehensive income (continued)

For the years ended December 31 Notes 2016 2015 2014

Revenue 61,992 48,977 53,513
Less: Royalties (2,923 ) (2,455 ) (3,522 )
Production costs 8 (32,086 ) (30,019 ) (27,908 )
Depreciation 13 (3,491 ) (3,322 ) (3,540 )
Gross profit 23,492 13,181 18,543
Other income 9.1 1,330 110 25
Other expenses (55 ) - -
Administrative expenses 10 (7,263 ) (7,622 ) (7,387 )
Share based payment expense 21 (788 ) (24 ) -
Sale of Blanket Mine treasury bills 9.2 3,202 - -
Net foreign exchange (loss)/gain (505 ) 2,850 1,065
Loss on settlement of hedge 25 (435 ) - -
Impairment - - (178 )
Finance income 11 16 1 14
Finance cost 11 (192 ) (536 ) (154 )
Profit before tax 18,802 7,960 11,928
Tax expense 12 (7,717 ) (2,370 ) (5,982 )
Profit for the year 11,085 5,590 5,946
Other comprehensive income
Items that are or may be reclassified to profit or loss
Foreign currency translation differences of foreign operations 262 (3,291 ) (685 )
Tax on other comprehensive income 12 - 199 111
Total comprehensive income for the year 11,347 2,498 5,372

Profit attributable to:
Owners of the Company 8,526 4,779 4,435
Non-controlling interests 2,559 811 1,511
Profit for the year 11,085 5,590 5,946
Total comprehensive income attributable to:
Owners of the Company 8,788 1,687 3,861
Non-controlling interests 2,559 811 1,511
Total comprehensive income for the year 11,347 2,498 5,372

Earnings per share
Basic earnings - per share ($) 19 0.16 0.09 0.08
Diluted earnings - per share ($) 19 0.16 0.09 0.08

(In thousands of United States Dollars, unless indicated otherwise)
For the years ended December 31	Notes		2019	*2018	*2017
Profit attributable to:
Owners of the Company			42,018	10,766	9,384
Non-controlling interests			8,383	2,990	2,512
Profit for the year			50,401	13,756	11,896
Total comprehensive income attributable to:
Owners of the Company			39,958	10,090	9,757
Non-controlling interests			8,383	2,990	2,512
Total comprehensive income for the year			48,341	13,080	12,269

Earnings per share
Basic earnings - per share ($)		25	3.82	0.99	0.86
Diluted earnings per share ($)		25	3.81	0.99	0.86

^{* The Group initially applied IFRS 16 on January 1, 2019, using the modified retrospective approach. Under this approach, comparative information is not restated. There was no cumulative effect of initially applying IFRS 16 to recognise in retained earnings at the date of initial application.}

The accompanying notes on page ~~F-6~~F-8 to ~~F-58~~F-74 are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

~~F-2~~

~~Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc~~

~~Consolidated statements of financial position~~

~~(In thousands of United States Dollars, unless indicated otherwise)~~

Notes
As at 31 December 2016 2015
Assets
Property, plant and equipment 13 64,873 49,218
Deferred tax asset 12 44 58
Total non-current assets 64,917 49,276

Inventories 14 7,222 6,091
Prepayments 810 667
Trade and other receivables 15 3,425 3,839
Income tax receivable 12 - 397
Cash and cash equivalents 16 14,335 12,568
Total current assets 25,792 23,562
Total assets 90,709 72,838

Equity and liabilities
Share capital 17 55,002 54,569
Reserves 18 142,374 141,942
Retained loss (141,767 ) (147,654 )
Equity attributable to shareholders 55,609 48,857
Non-controlling interests 31 3,708 1,504
Total equity 59,317 50,361

Liabilities
Provisions 20 3,456 2,762
Deferred tax liability 12 15,909 11,318
Long term portion of term loan facility 22 1,577 -
Cash settled share based payments 21.2 618 -
Total non-current liabilities 21,560 14,080

Short term portion of term loan facility 22 1,410 -
Trade and other payables 23 8,077 6,656
Income tax payable 12 345 53
Bank overdraft 16 - 1,688
Total current liabilities 9,832 8,397
Total liabilities 31,392 22,477
Total equity and liabilities 90,709 72,838

~~The accompanying notes~~

Signed on ~~page F-6 to F-58 are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.~~

On behalf of the Board: “S.R. Curtis”- Chief Executive Officer and ~~“M.~~“J.M. Learmonth”- Chief Financial Officer.

F-4

~~F-3~~

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Consolidated statements of ~~changes in equity~~

(~~In thousands of United States Dollars, unless indicated otherwise)~~

Share capital Foreign Currency Translation Reserve
Contributed Surplus

Share- based payment reserve
Retained Loss
Equity attributable to shareholders

Non- controlling interests (“NCI”)
Total Equity
Balance at December 31, 2013 54,569 (2,544 ) 132,591 15,847 (151,824 ) 48,639 (48 ) 48,591
Transactions with owners:
Dividends paid - - - - (2,850 ) (2,850 ) (770 ) (3,620 )
Total comprehensive income:
Profit for the year - - - - 4,435 4,435 1,511 5,946
Other comprehensive income for the year - (685 ) - - 111 (574 ) (574 )
Balance at December 31, 2014 54,569 (3,229 ) 132,591 15,847 (150,128 ) 49,650 693 50,343
Transactions with owners:
Equity settled share-based payment - - - 24 - 24 - 24
Dividends paid - - - - (2,504 ) (2,504 ) - (2,504 )
Total comprehensive income: -
Profit for the year - - - - 4,779 4,779 811 5,590
Other comprehensive income for the year - (3,291 ) - - 199 (3,092 ) - (3,092 )
Balance at December 31, 2015 54,569 (6,520 ) 132,591 15,871 (147,654 ) 48,857 1,504 50,361
Transactions with owners:
Equity settled share-based payment - - - 170 - 170 - 170
Shares issued – Option exercises (note 21.1) 433 - - - - 433 - 433
Dividends paid - - - - (2,639 ) (2,639 ) (355 ) (2,994 )
Total comprehensive income:
Profit for the year - - - - 8,526 8,526 2,559 11,085
Other comprehensive income for the year - 262 - - - 262 - 262
Balance at December 31, 2016 55,002 (6,258 ) 132,591 16,041 (141,767 ) 55,609 3,708 59,317

~~The accompanying notes on page F-6 to F-58 are an integral part of these consolidated~~ financial ~~statements~~

~~F-4~~

~~Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc~~

~~Consolidated Statements of cash flows~~

~~For the years ended December 31~~

position

(In thousands of United States Dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

	Notes
As at 31 December			2019		*2018
Assets
Property, plant and equipment		18	113,651		97,427
Deferred tax asset		17	63		98
Total non-current assets			113,714		97,525

Inventories		19	11,092		9,427
Prepayments			2,350		866
Trade and other receivables		20	6,912		6,392
Cash and cash equivalents		21	9,383		11,187
Gold hedge		16	102		-
			29,839		27,872
Assets held for sale		22.2	-		296
Total current assets			29,839		28,168
Total assets			143,553		125,693

Equity and liabilities
Share capital		23	56,065		55,102
Reserves		24	140,730		142,790
Retained loss			(88,380	)	(127,429	)
Equity attributable to shareholders			108,415		70,463
Non-controlling interests		37	16,302		8,345
Total equity			124,717		78,808

Liabilities
Provisions		26	3,346		3,309
Deferred tax liability		17	3,129		23,328
Loans and borrowings - long-term portion		28	1,942		5,960
Cash-settled share-based payments		27.1	540		2,090
Total non-current liabilities			8,957		34,687

Loans and borrowings - short-term portion		28	529		-
Trade and other payables		29	8,697		10,051
Income tax payable		17	163		1,538
Overdraft		21	490		-
			9,350		11,589
Liabilities associated with assets held for sale		22.2	-		609
Total current liabilities			9,350		12,198
Total liabilities			18,836		46,885
Total equity and liabilities			143,553		125,693

Note 2016 2015 2014

Cash flows from operating activities 24 25,671 8,823 15,584
Interest received 16 1 14
Interest paid (210 ) (493 ) (121 )
Tax paid 12 (2,466 ) (1,462 ) (4,526 )
Net cash from operating activities 23,011 6,869 10.951

Cash flows from investing activities
Acquisition of property, plant and equipment (19,885 ) (16,567 ) (6,150 )
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment 3 - -
Net cash used in investing activities (19,882 ) (16,567 ) (6,150 )

Cash flows from financing activities
Dividends paid (2,994 ) (2,504 ) (3,620 )
Proceeds from term loan facility 3,000 - -
Term loan – Transaction cost (73 ) - -
Proceeds from issue of share capital 433 - -
Net cash from/(used in) financing activities 366 (2,504 ) (3,620 )

Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 3,495 (12,202 ) 1,181
Effect of exchange rate fluctuation on cash held (40 ) - -
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 10,880 23,082 21,901
Net cash and cash equivalents at year end 16 14,335 10,880 23,082

The accompanying notes on page ~~F-6~~F-8 to ~~F-58~~F-74 are an integral part of these consolidated financial ~~statements~~

statements.

F-5

~~F-5~~

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Consolidated statements of changes in equity

(In thousands of United States Dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

	Notes			Share capital		Foreign Currency Translation Reserve		Contributed Surplus	Equity- settled Share- based payment reserve	Retained Loss		Equity attributable to shareholders		Non- controlling interests (“NCI”)		Total Equity
Balance at January, 2017*				55,002		(6,258	)	132,591	16,041	(141,767	)	55,609		3,708		59,317
Transactions with owners:
Equity-settled share-based expense transactions		27.2		-		-		-	705	-		705		130		835
Shares issued – Option exercises		23		246		-		-	-	-		246		-		246
Shares repurchased		23		(146	)	-		-	-	-		(146	)	-		(146	)
Dividends paid				-		-		-	-	(2,904	)	(2,904	)	(406	)	(3,310	)
Total comprehensive income:
Profit for the year				-		-		-	-	9,384		9,384		2,512		11,896
Other comprehensive income for the year				-		373		-	-	-		373		-		373
Balance at December 31, 2017*				55,102		(5,885	)	132,591	16,746	(135,287	)	63,267		5,944		69,211
Transactions with owners:
Equity-settled share-based expense transactions		27.2		-		-		-	14	-		14		-		14
Dividends paid				-		-		-	-	(2,908	)	(2,908	)	(589	)	(3,497	)
Total comprehensive income:
Profit for the year				-		-		-	-	10,766		10,766		2,990		13,756
Other comprehensive income for the year				-		(676	)	-	-	-		(676	)	-		(676	)
Balance at December, 2018*				55,102		(6,561	)	132,591	16,760	(127,429	)	70,463		8,345		78,808
Transactions with owners:
Equity-settled share-based expense transactions
Dividends paid				-		-		-	-	(2,969	)	(2,969	)	(426	)	(3,395	)
Shares issued – Share based payments		27.1	(a)	963		-		-	-	-		963		-		963
Total comprehensive income:
Profit for the year				-		-		-	-	42,018		42,018		8,383		50,401
Other comprehensive income for the year				-		(2,060	)	-	-	-		(2,060	)	-		(2,060	)
Balance at December, 2019				56,065		(8,621	)	132,591	16,760	(88,380	)	108,415		16,302		124,717
Notes				23		24		24	24					37

The accompanying notes on page F-8 to F-74 are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-6

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Consolidated Statements of cash flows
For the years ended December 31
(In thousands of United States Dollars, unless indicated otherwise)
	Note		2019		*2018		*2017

Cash flows from operating activities		30	23,885		21,119		28,885
Interest received			146		53		38
Interest paid			(454	)	(161	)	(199	)
Tax paid		17	(5,517	)	(3,344	)	(4,212	)
Net cash from operating activities			18,060		17,667		24,512

Cash flows from investing activities
Acquisition of property, plant and equipment			(20,024	)	(20,192	)	(21,639	)
Proceeds on sale of subsidiary		22.1	1,000		-		-
Net cash used in investing activities			(19,024	)	(20,192	)	(21,639	)

Cash flows from financing activities
Dividends paid			(3,395	)	(3,497	)	(3,310	)
Term loan repayments		28	-		(1,500	)	(1,500	)
Term loan proceeds		28	2,340		6,000		-
Term loan transaction costs		28	(46	)	(60	)	-
Payment of lease liabilities		13	(124	)	-		-
Proceeds from issue of share capital			-		-		246
Share repurchase cost			-		-		(146	)
Net cash (used in)/from financing activities			(1,225	)	943		(4,710	)

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents			(2,189	)	(1,582	)	(1,837	)
Effect of exchange rate fluctuation on cash held			(105	)	13		258
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year			11,187		12,756		14,335
Net cash and cash equivalents at year end		21	8,893		11,187		12,756

The accompanying notes on page F-8 to F-74 are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-7

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31,

2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise))

1~~Reporting entity~~

Reporting entity

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc (the “Company”) is a company domiciled in Jersey, Channel Islands. The address of the Company’s registered office is ~~3rd Floor, Weighbridge~~B006 Millais House, Castle Quay, St Helier, Jersey, Channel Islands. These consolidated financial statements of the ~~Group~~Company and its subsidiaries (the “Group”) comprise the consolidated statements of financial position as at December 31, 2019 and 2018, the consolidated statements of profit or loss and other comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for each of the years ended December 31, ~~2016~~2019, 2018 and ~~December 31, 2015 comprise the Company~~2017, notes, significant accounting policies and ~~its subsidiaries (together referred to as the “Group” and individually as “Group entities”).~~other explanatory information. The Group is primarily involved in the operation of a gold mine and the exploration and development of mineral properties for precious metals.

2~~Basis for preparation~~

~~(i) Statement~~

Caledonia’s shares are listed on the NYSE American stock exchange (symbol - “CMCL”) and on the Toronto Stock Exchange (symbol - “CAL”). Depository interests in Caledonia’s shares are admitted to trading on AIM of ~~compliance~~the London Stock Exchange plc (symbol - “CMCL”).

	2	Basis for preparation
	i)	Statement of compliance

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”).

The consolidated financial statements were authorised for issue by the Board of Directors on March ~~30, 2017.~~

~~(ii) Basis of measurement~~

17, 2020.

ii)

Basis of measurement

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the historical cost basis except for:

cash-settled share-based payment arrangements measured at fair value on grant and re-measurement dates;

derivative financial instruments measured at fair value; and

equity-settled share-based payment arrangements measured at fair value on grant date.

~~equity settled share-based payment arrangements measured at fair value on grant date;~~iii)

Functional currency

·	~~cash settled share-based payment arrangement measured at fair value on the grant and re-measurement dates; and~~

·	~~derivative financial instruments measured at fair value.~~

~~(iii) Functional currency~~

These consolidated financial statements are presented in United States dollars (“$” or “US Dollar”), which is also the functional currency of the Company. All financial information presented in United States dollars have been rounded to the nearest thousand, unless indicated otherwise.

F-8

~~(iv) Comparatives~~

Where necessary comparative periods may be adjusted to conform to changes in presentation. The Group has reclassified Exploration and Evaluation assets as a separate class of Property, plant and equipment in order to enhance disclosure. The January 1, 2015 carrying value of Mineral properties depreciated decreased by $1,951 (2014:1,871) and was renamed Mine development, infrastructure and other. The January 1, 2015 carrying value of Mineral properties not depreciated, increased by 1,951 (2014:1,871) and was renamed Exploration and Evaluation assets. The reclassifications had no impact on the statements of financial position.

~~F-6~~

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31,

2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

3~~Use of estimates and judgements~~

Use of accounting assumptions, estimates and judgements

In preparing these consolidated financial statements, management has made ~~judgements,~~accounting assumptions, estimates and ~~assumptions~~judgements that affect the application of the Group’s accounting policies and the reported ~~amount~~amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Actual results may differ from these estimates. Estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Changes in estimates are recognised prospectively.

(a)

~~Judgements, assumptions~~Assumptions and estimation uncertainties

~~i) Depreciation of Property, plant and equipment~~

Depreciation of Property, plant and equipment

Depreciation on mine development, infrastructure and other assets in the production phase is computed on the units-of-production method over the life-of-mine based on the estimated quantities of reserves (proven and probable) and resources (measured, indicated and inferred), which ~~can~~are planned to be ~~recovered~~extracted in the future from known mineral deposits. ~~The method of calculating depreciation changed during~~Where items have a shorter useful life than the ~~current financial year, refer to par 4(e)(iv) for more detail.~~life-of-mine, the mine development, infrastructure and other assets are depreciated over their useful life. Confidence in the existence, commercial viability and economical recovery of ~~such~~ reserves and resources included in the life-of-mine may be based on historical experience and available geological ~~information, such as geological information obtained from other operations that are contiguous to the Group’s mine.~~information. This is in addition to the drilling results obtained by the Group and management’s knowledge of the geological setting of the surrounding areas, which would enable simulations and extrapolations to be done with a sufficient degree of accuracy. In instances where management is able to demonstrate the economic recovery of ~~such~~ resources with a high level of confidence, such additional resources, are included in the calculation of depreciation. The future development costs are those costs that need to be incurred to access the resources, for example the costs to complete a decline or level, which may include infrastructure and equipping costs. These amounts have been extracted from the cash flow projections for the life-of-mine plans.

Other items of property, plant and equipment are depreciated as described in note ~~4(iv)~~ 5(f)(iv) Useful lives.

~~ii) Mineral reserves and resources~~

ii)

Mineral reserves and resources

Mineral reserves and resources are estimates of the amount of product that can be economically and legally extracted. In order to calculate the reserves and resources, estimates and assumptions are required about a range of geological, technical and economic factors, including but not limited to quantities, grades, production techniques, recovery rates, production costs, transport costs, commodity ~~demand, commodity~~ prices and exchange rates. Estimating the quantity and grade of mineral reserves and resources requires the size, shape and depth of orebodies to be determined by analysing geological data such as the logging and assaying of drill samples. This process may require complex and difficult geological ~~judgements~~assumptions and calculations to interpret the data. Estimates of mineral reserves and resources may change due to the change in economic assumptions used to estimate mineral reserves and resources and due to additional geological data becoming available during the course of operations.

The Group estimates its reserves (proven and probable) and resources (measured, indicated and inferred) based on information compiled by a Qualified Person in terms of the Canadian National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”) relating to geological and technical data of the size, depth,

F-9

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

Use of accounting assumptions, estimates and judgements (continued)

(a)

Assumptions and estimation uncertainties (continued)

ii)

Mineral reserves and resources (continued)

shape and grade of the ore body and suitable production techniques and recovery rates. Such an analysis requires geological and engineering assumptions to interpret the data. These assumptions include:

correlation between drill-holes intersections where multiple reefs are intersected;

continuity of mineralisation between drill-hole intersections within recognised reefs; and

appropriateness of the planned mining methods.

The Group estimates and reports reserves and resources in accordance with NI 43-101 and the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (the “CIM”) - CIM Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves. Complying with the CIM code, NI 43-101 requires the use of reasonable assumptions to calculate the recoverable resources. These assumptions include:

•		the gold price based on current market price and the Group’s assessment of future prices;
•		estimated future on-mine costs, sustaining and non-sustaining capital expenditures;
•		cut-off grade;
•		dimensions and extent, determined both from drilling and mine development, of ore bodies; and
•		planned future production from measured, indicated and inferred resources.

Changes in reported reserves and resources may affect the Group’s financial results and position in a number of ways, including the following:

asset carrying values may be affected due to changes in the estimated cash flows;

depreciation and amortisation charges to profit or loss may change as these are calculated on the unit-of-production method or where useful lives of an asset change; and

decommissioning, site restoration and environmental provisions and resources which may affect expectations about the timing or cost of these activities.

~~Asset carrying values may be affected due to changes in the estimated cash flows;~~iii)

Blanket mine’s indigenisation transaction

·	~~Depreciation and amortisation charges to profit or loss may change as these are calculated on the unit-of-production method or where useful lives of an asset change; and~~

·	~~Decommissioning, site restoration and environmental provisions may change in ore reserves and resources which may affect expectations about the timing or cost of these activities.~~

~~F-7~~

~~Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc~~

~~Notes~~The initial indigenisation transaction and modifications to the ~~Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~For the years ended December 31~~

(~~in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise~~)

3~~Use of estimates and judgements- (continued)~~

~~iii) Blanket mine’s indigenisation transaction~~

~~The~~ indigenisation transaction of ~~the~~ Blanket Mine (1983) (Private) Limited (“Blanket Mine”) required management to make significant ~~judgements~~assumptions and ~~assumptions~~estimates which are explained in ~~Note 5.~~note 6.

F-10

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

~~iv) Site restoration provisions~~

Use of accounting assumptions, estimates and judgements (continued)

(a)

Assumptions and estimation uncertainties (continued)

iv)

Site restoration provision

The site restoration provision has been calculated for the Blanket Mine based on an independent analysis of the rehabilitation costs as performed in ~~2015~~2018. Assumptions and a further internal assessment for additional areas of disturbance in 2016. The restorations provision for Eersteling Gold Mining Company Limited was estimated based on an internal management assessment. Estimates and assumptionsestimates are made when determining the inflationary effect on current restoration costs and the discount rate to be applied in arriving at the present value of the provision where the time value of money effect is significant. Assumptions, based on the current economic environment, have been made that management believes are a reasonable basis upon which to estimate the future liability. These estimates take into account any material changes to the assumptions that occur when reviewed by management. Estimates are reviewed annually and are based on current regulatory requirements. Significant changes in estimates of contamination, restoration standards and techniques will result in changes to ~~provisions~~the provision from period to period. Actual rehabilitation costs will ultimately depend on future market prices for the rehabilitation. The final cost of the currently ~~recognized~~recognised site rehabilitation ~~provisions~~provision may be higher or lower than currently provided for ~~(Refer~~(refer to note ~~20)~~26).

~~v) Exploration and evaluation (“E&E”) assets~~

Exploration and evaluation (“E&E”) assets

The Group also makes ~~estimates~~assumptions and ~~assumptions~~estimates regarding the possible impairment of E&E assets by evaluating whether it is likely that future economic benefits will flow to the Group, which may be based on assumptions about future events or circumstances. ~~Estimates~~Assumptions and ~~assumptions~~estimates made may change if new information becomes available. If information becomes available suggesting that the recovery of expenditures is unlikely, the amount ~~capitalized~~capitalised is written off in profit or loss in the period the new information becomes available. The recoverability of the carrying amount of exploration and evaluation assets ~~are dependent upon~~depends on the availability of sufficient funding to bring the properties into commercial production, the price of the products to be recovered and the undertaking of profitable mining operations. As a result of these uncertainties, the actual amount recovered may vary significantly from the carrying amount.

~~vi) Income taxes~~

vi)

Taxes

Significant ~~estimates~~assumptions and ~~assumptions~~estimates are required in determining the provision for income taxes. There are many transactions and calculations undertaken during the ordinary course of business for which the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. In 2019 the Zimbabwe Revenue Authority (“ZIMRA”) issued Public Notice 26 (“PN26”) effective from February 22, 2019. PN26 provided clarity on the interpretation of Section 4 (a) of the Finance Act [Chapter 23.04] of Zimbabwe, that requires a company earning taxable income to pay tax in the same or other specified currency that the income is earned. PN 26 clarifies that the calculation of taxable income be expressed in RTGS$ and that the payment of the tax payable, determined in RTGS$, be paid in the ratio of turnover earned. The application of PN26 resulted in a significant reduction in the deferred tax liability at December 31, 2019 and the Group ~~records its~~recorded the best estimate of the tax liability. The clarification of PN26 was applied prospectively and had no impact on comparative amounts.

F-11

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

3	Use of accounting assumptions, estimates and judgements (continued)
(a)	Assumptions and estimation uncertainties (continued)
vi)	Taxes (continued)

The tax liability ~~including~~of the ~~related~~Group includes interest and penalties in ~~the current tax~~its provision. Management believes they have adequately provided for the probable outcome of ~~these~~tax related matters; however, the final outcome or future outcomes anticipated in the calculation of the tax liabilities may result in a materially different outcome than the amount included in the tax liabilities. In addition, the Group ~~applies judgement~~makes assumptions and estimates in ~~recognizing~~recognising deferred tax assets relating to tax losses carried forward to the extent that there are sufficient taxable temporary differences (deferred tax liabilities) relating to the same taxation authority and the same taxable entity against which the unused tax losses may be ~~utilized~~utilised or sufficient estimated taxable income against which the losses can be ~~utilized.~~

~~F-8~~utilised

~~Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc~~

~~Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~For the years ended December 31~~

(~~in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise~~)

3vii)

~~Use of estimates and judgements - (continued)~~Share-based payment transactions

~~vii) Share-based payment transactions~~

~~Equity settled~~

Equity-settled share-based payment arrangements

The Group measures the cost of ~~equity settled,~~equity-settled share-based payment transactions with employees, directors and Blanket’s indigenous shareholders (refer notes 56 and ~~21.1)~~ 27.2) by reference to the fair value of the equity instruments on the date at which they are granted. Estimating fair value for share-based payment transactions requires determining the appropriate valuation model and considering the terms and conditions of the grant. This estimate also requires determining the most appropriate inputs to the valuation model including the expected life of the share option, volatility and dividend yield. Additional information about significant ~~judgements~~assumptions and estimates ~~and assumptions~~ for estimating fair value for share-based payment transactions are disclosed in note ~~21.1.~~

27.2. Where the Company granted the counterparty to a share-based payment award the choice of settlement in cash or shares the equity component is measured as the difference between the fair value of the goods and services and the fair value of the cash-settled share-based payment liability at the date when the goods and services are received at measurement date. For transactions with employees the equity component is zero.

Option pricing models require the input of assumptions including the expected price volatility. Changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, and therefore the existing models domay not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of the Group’s share ~~options~~.

~~Cash settled~~options.

Cash-settled share-based payment arrangements

The fair value of the amount payable to employees in respect of share-based awards which will be settled in cash is recognised as an expense with a corresponding increase in liabilities over the period over which the employee becomes unconditionally entitled to payment. The liability is re-measured at each reporting date. Any ~~changes~~change in the fair value of the liability ~~are~~is recognised ~~as an expense~~ in profit or loss.

Additional information about significant ~~judgements,~~assumptions and estimates ~~and the assumptions~~ used to ~~estimate~~determine the fair value of cash settled share-based payment transactions are disclosed in note ~~21.2.~~ 27.1.

F-12

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

~~viii) Impairment~~

3	Use of accounting assumptions, estimates and judgements (continued)
(a)	Assumptions and estimation uncertainties (continued)
viii)	Impairment

Non-financial assets

At each reporting date, the Group determines if impairment indicators exist, and if present, performs an impairment review of the non-financial assets held in the Group. The exercise is subject to various ~~judgemental decisions~~assumptions and estimates. ~~Financial~~

Non-derivative financial assets

The Group makes use of a simplified approach in accounting for trade and other receivables and records the loss allowance as lifetime expected credit losses. These are the expected shortfalls in contractual cash flows, considering the potential for default at any point during the life of the financial instrument. The Company uses its historical experience, external indicators and forward-looking information to calculate the expected credit losses using a provision matrix.

(b)	Judgements

Judgement is required when assessing whether an entity is controlled by the group or not. Controlled entities are consolidated. Further information is given in notes 5(a) and 6.

Refer to note 5(b)(ii) for judgement applied to determine functional currency of entities in the Group and the interbank rate of exchange to translate the Zimbabwean real time gross settlement, bond notes or bond coins (“RTGS$”).

Change in significant accounting policies

A number of other new standards are also ~~reviewed regularly~~effective from January 1, 2019 but they do not have a material effect on the Group’s financial statements. 4(a) and (b) were initially applied in fiscal 2019. 4(c) and (d) were initially applied in fiscal 2018.

(a)

IFRS 16 - Leases

The Group initially applied IFRS 16 Leases from January 1, 2019. A number of other new standards are also effective from January 1, 2019 but they do not have a material effect on the Group’s financial statements. The Group applied IFRS 16 using the modified retrospective approach, under which the cumulative effect of initial application has to be recognised in retained earnings at January 1, 2019, although the adoption of IFRS 16 had no significant effect on the Group’s retained earnings at initial recognition. Accordingly, the comparative information presented for ~~impairment. Further~~2018 and 2017 are not restated – i.e. it is presented, as previously reported, under IAS 17 and related interpretations. The details of the ~~judgements and estimates made for these reviews are set out~~change in ~~note 13.~~the accounting policy is disclosed below. Additionally, the disclosure requirements in IFRS 16 have not been applied to comparative information.

F-13

~~ix) Measurement of fair values~~

~~Some of the Group’s accounting policies and disclosure require the measurement of fair values, for both financial and non-financial assets and liabilities.~~

~~F-9~~

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31,

2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

Change in significant accounting policies (continued)

(a)

IFRS 16 - Leases (continued)

As a lessee, the Group leases property for its administrative offices in Jersey, Channel Islands and in Johannesburg, South Africa. The Group previously classified leases as operating leases based on its assessment of whether the lease transferred significantly all of the risks and rewards incidental to ownership of the underlying asset to the Group. Under IFRS 16, the Group recognises right of use assets and lease liabilities for these leases – i.e. these leases are on-balance sheet.

Leases classified as operating leases under IAS 17

Previously, the Group classified property leases as operating leases under IAS 17. On transition, for these leases, lease liabilities were measured at the present value of the remaining lease payments, discounted at the Group’s incremental borrowing rates as at January 1, 2019, of 4% and 10,25% for each of the two leases accounted for at December 31, 2019.

Right of use assets are measured at an amount equal to the lease liability, adjusted by the amount of any prepaid or accrued lease payments.

The Group has tested its right of use assets for impairment on the date of transition and concluded that there were no indications that the right of use assets were impaired.

The Group used a number of practical expedients when applying IFRS 16 to leases previously classified as operating leases under IAS 17. In particular, the Group:

did not recognise right of use assets and liabilities for leases for which the lease term ends within 12 months of the date of initial application;

did not recognise right of use assets and liabilities for leases of low value assets;

excluded initial direct costs from the measurement of the right of use asset at the date of initial application; and

used hindsight when determining the lease term.

ii)

Impact on initial date of transition to IFRS 16

3The impact of initial date of transition is summarised below:	~~Use~~	$’000

Right of ~~estimates~~use assets (cost) – Property, plant and ~~judgements -~~equipment (note 18)		410
Right of use assets (accumulated depreciation) – Property, plant and equipment (note 18)		(146	)
Lease liabilities – Trade and other payables		264

When measuring lease liabilities for leases that were classified as operating leases, the Group discounted lease payments using its incremental borrowing rate at January 1, 2019. The weighted-average rate applied ranged between 4% and 10,25%.

F-14

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

Change in significant accounting policies (continued)

(b)

IFRIC 23 - Uncertainty over Income Tax Treatments

IFRIC 23 provides guidance on the accounting for current and deferred tax liabilities and assets in circumstances in which there is uncertainty over income tax treatments.

The Interpretation requires:

~~ix) Measurement~~The Group to determine whether uncertain tax treatments should be considered separately, or together as a group, based on which approach provides better predictions of ~~fair values - (continued)~~

~~When measuring~~ the ~~fair value of an asset or a liability,~~resolution;

The Group to determine if it is probable that the ~~Group uses market observable data as far as possible. Where applicable, fair values are categorised into different levels in a fair value hierarchy~~tax authorities will accept the uncertain tax treatment; and

If it is not probable that the uncertain tax treatment will be accepted, measure the tax uncertainty based on the ~~inputs used~~most likely amount or expected value, depending on whichever method better predicts the resolution of the uncertainty. This measurement is required to be based on the assumption that each of the tax authorities will examine amounts they have a right to examine and have full knowledge of all related information when making those examinations.

The Group’s existing accounting policy for uncertain income tax treatments is consistent with the requirements in IFRIC 23 Uncertainty over Income Tax Treatments, which became effective on January 1, 2019 and required no adjustment to the amounts in the ~~valuation technique as follows:~~financial statements.

(c)

IFRS 9 – Financial instruments

The Group adopted IFRS 9 on January 1, 2018. The limited retrospective approach followed in the adoption of IFRS 9 did not have a significant effect on the Group’s financial assets and liabilities.

As a result of the adoption of IFRS 9, the Group has adopted consequential amendments to IAS 1 - Presentation of Financial Statements, which require impairment of financial assets to be presented in a separate line item in the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income. Previously, the Group’s approach was to include the impairment of the royalty rebate in other expenses. Consequently, the Group reclassified impairment losses amounting to $181, recognised under IAS 39, from other expenses to impairment loss on trade receivables in the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2017.

(d)

IFRS 15 – Revenue from contracts with customers

The Group has adopted IFRS 15 on January 1, 2018. The Group’s revenue arrangements consist of a single performance obligation to transfer promised goods. As a result, the Group did not identify any material differences in the amount and timing of revenue recognition for its revenue. Accordingly, the Group did not record any transition adjustment upon adoption of the new guidance. Under the new standard, substantially all of the Group’s revenue is recognised when the goods are delivered to Fidelity Printers and Refiners Limited.

IFRS 15 establishes a comprehensive framework for determining whether, how much and when revenue is recognised. It replaced IAS 18 - Revenue, IAS 11 - Construction Contracts and related interpretations. Under IFRS 15, revenue is recognised when a customer obtains control of the goods or services. Determining the timing of the transfer of control, at a point in time or over time, requires judgement.

F-15

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

~~Level 1: quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.~~5

Significant accounting policies

·	~~Level 2: inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the assets and liabilities, either directly (i.e. as price) or indirectly (i.e. derives from prices).~~

·	~~Level 3: inputs for the assets or liabilities that are not based for identical assets or observable market data (unobservable inputs).~~

4~~Significant accounting policies~~

~~Except as stated in note 4(r), the~~

The accounting policies set out below have been applied consistently to all periods presented in these consolidated financial ~~statements.~~

~~(a) Basis of consolidation~~

statements, except as disclosed in notes 4(a), 5(c) and 5(d).

	(a)	Basis of consolidation
	i)	Subsidiaries and structured entities

Subsidiaries and certain structured entities are entities controlled by the Group. The Group controls an entity when it is exposed to, or has rights to, variability in returns from its involvement with the entity and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the entity. The financial statements of subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial statements from the date on which control commences until the date on which control ceases.

ii)

Loss of control

When the Group loses control over a subsidiary, it derecognises the assets and liabilities of the subsidiary, and any related Non-controlling interests (“NCI”) and other components of equity. Any gain or loss is recognised in profit or loss. Any interest retained in the former subsidiary is measured at fair value when control is lost.

iii)

Non-controlling interests

NCI are measured at their proportionate share of the carrying amounts of the acquiree’s identifiable net assets at fair value at the acquisition date. Changes in the Group’s interest in a subsidiary that do not result in a loss of control are accounted for as equity transactions.

~~F-10~~

~~Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc~~

~~Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~For the years ended December 31~~

(~~in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise~~)

4~~Significant accounting policies - (continued)~~

~~iv) Transactions eliminated on consolidation~~

Intra-group balances and transactions, and any unrealised income and expenses arising from intra-group transactions, are eliminated. Unrealised losses are eliminated in the same way as unrealised gains, but only to the extent that there is no evidence of impairment.

iv)

Transactions eliminated on consolidation heading and par outstanding

(b)

Foreign currency

Foreign operations

As stated in note 2(iii) the presentation currency of the Group is the United States Dollar. The functional currency of the Company and all its subsidiaries is the United States Dollar except for the South African ~~subsidiaries~~subsidiary that ~~use~~uses the South African Rand (“ZAR”) as ~~their~~its functional currency. Subsidiary financial statements have been translated to the presentation currency as follows:

·•	~~Assets~~assets and liabilities are translated using the exchange rate at period end; and

·•	~~Income,~~income, expenses and cash flow items are translated using the rate that approximates the exchange rates at the dates of the transactions.

When the settlement of a monetary item receivable from or payable to a foreign operation is neither planned nor likely in the foreseeable future, foreign exchange gains and losses arising from the item are considered to form part of the net investment in a foreign operation and are ~~recognized~~recognised in Other Comprehensive Income (“OCI”).

If settlement is planned or likely in the foreseeable future, foreign exchange gains and losses are included in profit or loss. When settlement occurs, settlement will not be regarded as a partial disposal and accordingly the foreign exchange gain or loss previously recognised in OCI is not reclassified to profit or loss/reallocated to NCI.

F-16

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

	5	Significant accounting policies (continued)
	(b)	Foreign currency (continued)
	i)	Foreign operations (continued)

When the Group disposes of its entire interest in a foreign operation, or loses control ~~joint control, or significant influence~~ over a foreign operation, the foreign currency gains or losses accumulated in OCI related to the foreign operation are ~~recognized in~~reclassified to profit or loss. If ~~an entity~~the Group disposes of part of an interest in a foreign operation which remains a subsidiary, a proportionate amount of foreign currency gains or losses accumulated in OCI related to the subsidiary are ~~reallocated~~reattributed between controlling and non-controlling interests.

All resulting translation differences are reported in ~~OCI.~~

OCI and accumulated in the foreign currency translation reserve.

ii)

Foreign currency translation

In preparing the financial statements of the Group entities, transactions in currencies other than the ~~entities’~~ functional currency (foreign currencies) of these Group entities are recorded at the rates of exchange prevailing at the dates of the transactions. At each reporting date, monetary assets and liabilities are translated using the current foreign exchange rate. Non-monetary assets and liabilities are translated using the historical rate on the date of the transaction. All gains and losses on translation of these foreign currency transactions are included in profit or loss for the year.

From October 1, 2018 the RBZ pegged the RTGS$ at 1:1 to the US Dollar and on February 20, 2019 issued a further monetary policy statement, which allowed inter-bank trading between RTGS$ and foreign currency. The interbank rate was introduced at 2.5 RTGS$ to 1 US Dollar and traded at 16.77 RTGS$ to 1 US Dollar as at December 31, 2019. On June 24, 2019 the Government issued SI 142 which stated “Zimbabwe dollar (RTGS$) to be the sole currency for legal tender purposes for any transactions in Zimbabwe”.

Further, the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe (“RBZ”) issued a directive to Zimbabwean banks to separate foreign currency (“Foreign currency”) and RTGS$ for bank accounts held by clients on October 1, 2018. Subsequent to the directive the RBZ announced that 30% of Blanket Mine’s gold proceeds will be received in Foreign currency (i.e. United States dollars) and the remainder received as RTGS$. From November 12, 2018 the RBZ increased the Foreign currency allocation from 30% to 55% with the remainder received as RTGS$. The allocation percentages remained in effect up to the date of approval of these financial statements.

In applying IAS 21, management determined that the US Dollar remained the primary currency in which the Group’s Zimbabwean entities operate, as:

the majority of revenue is received in US Dollar;

the gold price receivable was calculated in US Dollar;

the majority of costs are calculated by reference to the US Dollar if denominated in RTGS$ or is paid in US Dollar; and

income tax liabilities calculated in RTGS$ are settled predominantly in US Dollar.

The application of IAS 21, the advent of SI 142 and the devaluation of the RTGS$ against the US Dollar had a significant impact on the US Dollar value of RTGS$ denominated Zimbabwean monetary assets and liabilities consolidated, as part of the Group. Monetary items mostly affected include, monetary liabilities such as income and deferred tax liabilities, loans and borrowings, trade and other payables and to a lesser extent monetary assets such as cash held in RTGS$.

F-17

~~F-11~~

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31,

2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

4~~Significant accounting policies - (continued)~~

~~(b)~~	~~Foreign currency~~5	Significant accounting policies (continued)
	(c)	Leases

The Group recognises a right of use asset and a lease liability at the lease commencement date. The right of use asset is initially measured at cost, which comprises the initial amount of the lease liability adjusted for any lease payments made at or before the commencement date, plus any initial direct costs incurred and an estimate of costs to dismantle and remove the underlying asset or to restore the underlying asset or the site on which it is located, less any lease incentives received.

The right of use asset is subsequently depreciated using the straight-line method from the commencement date to the end of the lease term, unless the lease transfers ownership of the underlying asset to the Group by the end of the lease term or the cost of the right of use asset reflects that the Group will exercise a purchase option. In that case the right of use asset will be depreciated over the useful life of the underlying asset, which is determined on the same basis as those of property and equipment. In addition, the right of use asset is periodically reduced by impairment losses, if any, and adjusted for certain remeasurements of the lease liability.

The lease liability is initially measured at the present value of the lease payments that are not paid at the commencement date, discounted using the interest rate implicit in the lease or, if that rate cannot be readily determined, the Group’s incremental borrowing rate. Generally, the Group uses its incremental borrowing rate as the discount rate.

The Group determines its incremental borrowing rate by obtaining interest rates from various external financing sources and makes certain adjustments to reflect the terms of the lease and type of the asset leased.

Lease payments included in the measurement of the lease liability comprise the following:

fixed payments, including in-substance fixed payments;

variable lease payments that depend on an index or a rate, initially measured using the index or rate as at the commencement date;

amounts expected to be payable under a residual value guarantee; and

the exercise price under a purchase option that the Group is reasonably certain to exercise, lease payments in an optional renewal period if the Group is reasonably certain to exercise an extension option, and penalties for early termination of a lease unless the Group is reasonably certain not to terminate early.

The lease liability is measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method. It is remeasured when there is a change in future lease payments arising from a change in an index or rate, if there is a change in the Group’s estimate of the amount expected to be payable under a residual value guarantee, if the Group changes its assessment of whether it will exercise a purchase, extension or termination option or if there is a revised in-substance fixed lease payment.

When the lease liability is remeasured in this way, a corresponding adjustment is made to the carrying amount of the right of use asset, or is recorded in profit or loss if the carrying amount of the right of use asset has been reduced to zero.

The Group presents right of use assets that do not meet the definition of investment property in ‘property, plant and equipment’ and lease liabilities in ‘trade and other payables’ in the statement of financial position.

The Group has elected not to recognise right of use assets and lease liabilities for leases of low-value assets and short-term leases, including IT equipment. The Group recognises the lease payments associated with these leases as an expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

F-18

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

Significant accounting policies (continued)

(c)

Leases (continued)

Policy applicable before January 1, 2019

At inception of an arrangement, the Group determines whether the arrangement is or contains a lease. At inception or on reassessment of an arrangement that contains a lease, the Group separates payments and other consideration required by the arrangement into those for the lease and those for other elements on the basis of their relative fair values. If the Group concludes for a finance lease that it is impracticable to separate the payments reliably, then an asset and a liability are recognised at an amount equal to the fair value of the underlying asset; subsequently, the liability is reduced as payments are made and an imputed finance cost on the liability is recognised using the Group’s incremental borrowing rate.

Leases of property, plant and equipment that transfer to the Group substantially all of the risks and rewards of ownership are classified as finance leases. The leased assets are measured initially at an amount equal to the lower of their fair value and the present value of the minimum lease payments. Subsequent to initial recognition, the assets are accounted for in accordance with the accounting policy applicable to that asset. Assets held under other leases are classified as operating leases and are not recognised in the Group’s statement of financial position.

Payments made under operating leases are recognised in profit or loss on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. Lease incentives received are recognised as an integral part of the total lease expense, over the term of the lease. Minimum lease payments made under finance leases are apportioned between the finance expense and the reduction of the outstanding liability. The finance expense is allocated to each period during the lease term so as to produce a constant periodic rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability.

	(d)	Financial instruments
	i)	Non-derivative financial assets

Policy applicable from January 1, 2018

Recognition and initial measurement

The Group ~~initially recognises loans and receivables on the date that which they originate. All other~~holds only financial assets measured at amortised cost and at fair value through profit or loss. Financial assets are initially recognised ~~initially on the trade date at which~~when the Group becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument. A financial asset (unless it is a trade receivable without a significant financing component) or financial liability is initially measured at fair value plus, for an item not at fair value through profit or loss, transaction costs that are directly attributable to its acquisition or issue. A trade receivable without a significant financing component is initially measured at the transaction price.

F-19

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

	5	Significant accounting policies (continued)
	(d)	Financial instruments (continued)
	i)	Non-derivative financial assets (continued)

Classification and subsequent measurement

On initial recognition, a financial asset is classified as and measured at amortised cost or at fair value through profit or loss. Financial assets are not reclassified subsequent to their initial recognition unless the Group changes its business model for managing financial assets, in which case all affected financial assets are reclassified on the first day of the first reporting period following the change in the business model.

A financial asset is measured at amortised cost if it meets both of the following conditions and is not designated as at fair value through profit or loss:

it is held within a business model whose objective is to hold assets to collect contractual cash flows; and

its contractual terms give rise on specified dates to cash flows that are solely payments of principal and interest on the principal amount outstanding.

All financial assets of the Group not classified as and measured at amortised cost are measured at fair value through profit or loss. This includes all derivative financial assets. On initial recognition, the Group may irrevocably designate a financial asset, that otherwise meets the requirements to be measured at amortised cost, to fair value through profit or loss if doing so eliminates or significantly reduces an accounting mismatch that would otherwise arise. Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss are subsequently measured at fair value. Net gains and losses are recognised in profit or loss. Financial assets classified as and measured at amortised cost are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method. The amortised cost is reduced by impairment losses. Interest income, foreign exchange gains and losses and impairment are recognised in profit or loss. Any gain or loss on derecognition is recognised in profit or loss.

Policy applicable before January 1, 2018

Trade receivables were initially recognized at fair value and subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method, less a provision for estimated credit losses. All other financial assets were recognised initially on the trade date at which the Group became a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument.

The Group derecognises a financial asset when the contractual rights to the cash flows from the asset expire, or it transfers the rights to receive the contractual cash flows from the financial asset in a transaction in which substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of the financial asset are ~~transferred. Any interest~~ transferred or it neither transfers nor retains substantially all of the risks and rewards of ownership and does not retain control over the transferred asset.

F-20

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017

(in ~~transferred financial assets that is created or retained by the Group is recognised as a separate asset or liability.~~thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

	5	Significant accounting policies (continued)
	(d)	Financial instruments (continued)
	ii)	Non-derivative financial assets (continued)

The Group ~~has~~had the following non-derivative financial assets:

Loans and receivables

Loans and receivables included trade and other ~~receivables as well as cash and cash equivalents.~~

~~Loans and receivables~~

receivables. Loans and receivables ~~are~~were financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that ~~are~~were not quoted in an active market. Such assets ~~are~~were recognised initially at fair value plus any directly attributable transaction costs. Subsequent to initial recognition, loans and receivables ~~are~~were measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method, less any impairment losses. The impairment loss on receivables iswas based on a review of all outstanding amounts at year end. Bad debts ~~are~~were written off during the year in which they ~~are~~were identified. Interest income ~~is recognized~~was recognised by applying the effective interest rate, except for short-term receivables when the recognition of interest would be immaterial.

~~Loans and receivables include trade and other receivables.~~

~~Cash and cash equivalents~~

Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash balances and call deposits with original maturities of three months or less. Bank overdrafts are repayable on demand and form an integral part of the Group’s cash management process. The bank overdraft is included as a component of cash and cash equivalents for the purpose of the statement of cash flows.

~~F-12~~

~~Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc~~

~~Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~For the years ended December 31~~

(~~in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise~~)

4~~Significant accounting policies - (continued)~~

ii)

Non-derivative financial ~~liabilities~~instruments

~~Financial~~

Non-derivative financial liabilities are recognised initially on the trade date at which the Group becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument. The Group derecognises a financial liability when its contractual obligations are discharged, cancelled or expire.

Non-derivative financial liabilities consist of bank overdrafts, loans and borrowings and trade and other payables.

Such financial liabilities are recognised initially at fair value plus any directly attributable transaction costs. Subsequent to initial recognition these financial liabilities are measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method.

iii)

Derivative financial instruments

~~During the year the~~

The Group held derivative financial instruments to hedge its gold price exposure. Derivatives are recognised initially at fair ~~value,~~value; attributable transaction costs are recognised in profit or loss as incurred. Subsequent to initial recognition, derivatives are measured at fair value. The Group does not hold derivatives that are classified as cash flow hedges, embedded derivatives or hedges that qualify as highly effective. Therefore, all changes in the fair value of derivative instruments are accounted for in profit or loss.

The adoption of IFRS 9 on January 1, 2018 had no impact on this accounting policy.

iv)

Offsetting

Financial assets and liabilities are offset and the net amount presented in the statement of financial position when, and only when, the Group has a legal right to offset the amounts and intends either to settle on a net basis or to realise the asset and settle the liability simultaneously.

F-21

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

~~(d)~~ ~~Share capital~~

	5	Significant accounting policies (continued)
	(e)	Cash and cash equivalents

(f)

Share capital

Share capital is classified as equity. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue, consolidation and repurchase of fractional items of shares and share options are recognised as a deduction from equity, net of any tax effects.

~~(e)~~

(g)

Property, plant and equipment

Recognition and measurement

Items of property, plant and equipment are measured at cost less accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment losses. Cost includes expenditures that are directly attributable to the acquisition of the asset. The cost of self-constructed assets includes the cost of materials and direct labour, any other costs directly attributable to bringing the assets to a working condition for their intended use, the costs of dismantling and removing the items and restoring the site on which they are located, and borrowing costs on qualifying assets. Gains and losses on disposal of an item of property, plant and equipment are determined by comparing the proceeds from disposal with the carrying amount of property, plant and equipment, and are recognised ~~within other income~~ in profit or loss.

~~F-13~~

~~Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc~~

~~Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~For the years ended December 31~~

(~~in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise~~)

4~~Significant accounting policies - (continued)~~

ii)

Exploration and evaluation assets

Exploration costs are capitalised as incurred, unless the exploration costs are related to speculative drilling on unestablished orebodies, general administrative or overhead costs associated with exploration drilling. The costs related to speculative drilling on unestablished orebodies, general administrative or overhead costs are expensed as ~~incurred, unless there is a high degree of confidence in the project's viability, it is possible that the project will return future economic benefits and~~ ~~the legal right to explore a property is acquired, in these circumstances the costs will be capitalised. These exploration~~incurred. Exploration and evaluation ~~cost~~costs capitalised are disclosed under property, plant and ~~equipment~~.equipment. Direct expenditures include such costs as materials used, surveying costs, drilling costs, payments made to contractors, direct administrative costs and depreciation on plant and equipment during the exploration phase.

Costs not directly attributable to exploration and evaluation activities, including general administrative overhead costs, are expensed in the year in which they occur.

Once the technical feasibility and commercial viability of extracting the mineral resource has been determined, the property is considered to be a mine under development and moved to the mine development, infrastructure and other asset category within Property, plant and equipment. ~~All~~Capitalised direct costs related to the acquisition, exploration and development of mineral properties ~~are capitalized~~remain capitalised until the properties to which they relate are ready for their intended use, sold, abandoned or management has determined there to be impairment. Exploration and evaluation assets are tested for impairment before the assets are transferred to mine development, infrastructure and other assets.

F-22

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

	5	Significant accounting policies (continued)
	(g)	Property, plant and equipment (continued)
	iii)	Subsequent costs

The cost of replacing a part of an item of ~~property,~~Property, plant and equipment is recognised in the carrying amount of the item if it is probable that the future economic benefits embodied within the part will flow to the Group, and its cost can be measured reliably. The carrying amount of the replaced part is derecognised. The costs of the day-to-day servicing of property, plant and equipment are recognised in profit or loss as incurred.

iv)

Depreciation

Depreciation is calculated to write off the depreciable amount, which is the cost of an asset, or other amount substituted for cost, less its residual value. ~~Depreciation~~On commencement of commercial production, depreciation of mine development, infrastructure and other assets is calculated on the unit-of-production method using the estimated measured, indicated and inferred resources which are planned to be extracted in terms of Blanket’s life-of-mine plan (“LoMP”). Resources that are not included in the LoMP are not included in the calculation of depreciation.

For other categories, depreciation is recognised in profit or loss on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of each part of an item of property, plant and equipment, ~~except for mine development, infrastructure and other assets,~~ since this most closely reflects the expected pattern of consumption of the future economic benefits embodied in the asset. ~~On commencement~~

Inferred resources are included in the LoMP to the extent that there is a successful history of ~~commercial production,~~upgrading inferred resources. Blanket reports its resources inclusive of reserves. As a result, resources included in the LoMP and hence in the calculation of depreciation include material from measured, indicated and inferred resource classes as detailed below under the following types of resources:

Measured resources – all proven reserve blocks plus 50% of the remnant pillar blocks.

Indicated resources – all probable reserves plus indicated resources which occur within the mine ~~development,~~extent as defined by the LoMP infrastructure.

Inferred resources – inferred resources (discounted by approximately 30%) that are well defined in terms of geometry (position, width, extent) falling within the planned infrastructure as per the LoMP.

In addition, inferred resources are included in the LoMP if it is expected that the inferred resources can be economically recovered in the future. Economic recovery is expected if a history can be proven that the recovered grade of the inferred resources exceeded the pay limit grade and ~~other assets are provided~~ when this trend can be expected in the future and if it is economical to recover inclusive of the cost of the capital requirements to access and extract the gold from the inferred resources. Refer to note 18 for on the ~~unit-of-production basis using estimated reserves and resources.~~ evaluation of the pay limit.

Land is not depreciated.

The calculation of the units of production rate could be affected to the extent that actual production in the future is different from the current forecast production based on reserves and resources. This would generally result from the extent to which there are significant changes in any of the factors or assumptions used in estimating mineral reserves and resources.

F-23

~~F-14~~

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31,

2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

4~~Significant accounting policies – (continued)~~

	5	Significant accounting policies (continued)
	(f)	Property, plant and equipment (continued)
	iv)	Depreciation (continued)

These factors include:

·	~~Changes in mineral reserves and resources;~~

·	~~Differences between actual commodity prices ad commodity price assumptions;~~

·	~~Unforeseen operational issues at mine sites; and~~

·	~~Changes in capital, operating, mining, processing and reclamation costs, discount rates and foreign exchange rates.~~

~~Change~~changes in ~~depreciation method~~mineral reserves and resources;

differences between actual commodity prices and commodity price assumptions;

~~Previously~~unforeseen operational issues at mine sites; and

changes in capital, operating, mining, areas to which the full extent of the orebodies were not determinable because ore bearing structures open at depth or open laterally, the straight line method of depreciation was applied over the estimated life of the mine for mine development, infrastructureprocessing and ~~other assets. Due to an increase in focus on deep drilling which is expected to result in regular updates to the reserve~~reclamation costs, discount rates and resources statements of Blanket Mine, it was determined that these items of property, plant and equipment will be depreciated on the units-of-production method from July 1, 2016. The change in estimation resulted in a decrease of $138 in the depreciation charge for period July 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016. This change in depreciation method has been accounted for prospectively as a change in estimate in accordance with IFRS.foreign exchange rates.

Useful lives

The estimated useful lives for the current and comparative periods are as follows:

buildings 10 to 15 years (2018: 10 to 15 years; 2017: 10 to 15 years);

plant and equipment 10 years (2018: 10 years; 2017: 10 years);

·	~~buildings 10 to 15 years (2015: 10 to 15 years)~~

fixtures and fittings including computers 4 to 10 years (2018: 4 to 10 years; 2017: 4 to 10 years);

·	~~plant and equipment 10 years (2015: 10 years)~~

motor vehicles 4 years (2018: 4 years; 2017: 4 years);

·	~~fixtures~~Right of use assets 3 to 6 years (determined by lease term); and ~~fittings including computers 4 to 10 years (2015: 4 to 10 years)~~

·	~~motor vehicles 4 years (2015: 4 years)~~

mine development, infrastructure and other assets in production, units-of-production method.

·	mine development, infrastructure and other assets in production, units-of-production method from July 1, 2016 and 11 years on the straight line method for the period January 1, 2016 to June 30, 2016 (2015: 11 years, straight line method)

Depreciation methods, useful lives and residual values are reviewed each financial year and adjusted if appropriate. When parts of an item of property, plant and equipment have different useful lives, they are accounted for as separate items (major components) of property, plant and equipment.

~~(f)~~

(g)

Inventories

Consumable stores are measured at the lower of cost and net realisable value. The cost of consumable stores is based on the weighted average cost principle, and includes expenditure incurred in acquiring the inventories, production or conversion costs and other costs incurred in bringing them to their existing location and condition. InGold in process is measured at the ~~case~~lower of cost and net realisable value. The cost of gold in process ~~cost~~ includes an appropriate share of production overheads based on normal operating capacity and is valued on the weighted average cost principle. Net realisable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less the estimated costs of completion and selling expenses.

F-24

~~F-15~~

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31,

2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

Significant accounting policies – (continued)

~~(g)~~	(h)	Impairment
	i)	Non-derivative financial assets (including receivables)

~~(i)Non-derivative financial assets (including receivables)~~

~~A financial asset~~

The Group applies the IFRS 9 simplified model of recognising lifetime expected credit losses for all trade receivables as these items do not ~~classified~~have a significant financing component. In measuring the expected credit losses, the trade receivables have been assessed on an individual basis as ~~fair value through profit or~~they possess different credit risk characteristics. Trade receivables have been assessed based on the days past due. The expected loss ~~is assessed at~~rates are based on the payment profile for gold sales over the past 48 months prior to December 31, of each ~~reporting date~~year reported. The historical rates are adjusted to ~~determine whether~~reflect current and forward-looking macroeconomic factors affecting the customer’s ability to settle the amount outstanding. However, given the short period exposed to credit risk the impact of these factors has not been considered significant. Trade receivables are written off (i.e. derecognised) when there is ~~objective evidence that it is impaired. A non-derivative financial asset is impaired if objective evidence indicates that a loss event has occurred after the initial recognition~~no reasonable expectation of ~~the asset,~~recovery. Failure to make payments within 90 days from lodgement date with Fidelity Printers and that the loss event had a negative effect on the estimated future cash flows of that asset that can be estimated reliably. Objective evidence that financial assets are impaired can include default or delinquency by a debtor, restructuring of an amount dueRefiners Limited (“Fidelity”) and failure to engage with the Group on ~~terms that the Group would not consider otherwise, indications that a debtor or issuer will enter bankruptcy, the absence or disappearance~~alternative payment arrangement, amongst others, are considered indicators of ~~an active market for a bond or other security. The Group considers evidence~~no reasonable expectation of impairment for receivables at both the specific asset and collective level. All individually significant receivables are assessed for specific impairment. All individually significant receivables found not to be specifically impaired are then collectively assessed for any impairment that has been incurred but not yet identified. Receivables that are not individually significant are collectively assessed for impairment by grouping together receivables with similar risk characteristics. An impairment loss in respect of a non-derivative financial asset measured at amortised cost is calculated as the difference between its carrying amount and the present value of the estimated future cash flows discounted at the asset’s original effective interest rate. Losses are recognised in profit or loss and reflected in an allowance account against receivables. Interest on the impaired asset continues to be recognised through the unwinding of the discount. When a subsequent event causes the amount of impairment loss to decrease, the decrease in impairment loss is reversed through profit or loss.

~~(ii)Non-financial assets~~

recovery.

ii)

Non-financial assets

The carrying amounts of the Group’s non-financial assets, other than inventories and deferred tax assets are reviewed at each reporting date to determine whether there is any indication of impairment. If any such indication exists, then the asset’s recoverable amount is estimated. The recoverable amount of an asset or cash-generating unit is the greater of its value in use and its fair value less costs of disposal. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset. For the purpose of impairment testing, assets that cannot be tested individually are grouped together into the smallest group of assets that generates cash inflows from continuing use that are largely independent of the cash inflows of other assets or groups of assets (the “cash-generating ~~unit,~~unit” or ~~CGU”~~“CGU”). The Group’s corporate assets do not generate separate cash inflows. If there is an indication that a CGU to which a corporate asset is allocated may be impaired, then the recoverable amount is determined for the CGU to which the corporate asset belongs.

An impairment loss is recognised if the carrying amount of a CGU exceeds its estimated recoverable amount. Impairment losses recognised in respect of CGUs are allocated to reduce the carrying amount of assets in the unit (group of units) on a pro rata basis. Impairment losses recognised in prior periods are assessed at each reporting date for any indications that the loss has decreased or no longer exists. An impairment loss is reversed if there has been an indication of reversal and a change in the estimates used to determine the recoverable

~~F-16~~

~~Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc~~

~~Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~For the years ended December 31~~

(~~in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise~~)

4~~Significant accounting policies – (continued)~~

~~(ii)Non-financial assets – (continued)~~

amount. An impairment loss is reversed only to the extent that the asset’s carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined, net of depreciation or amortisation, if no impairment loss had been recognised.

F-25

~~(iii)Impairment~~

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of ~~exploration and evaluation (“E&E”~~United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise) ~~assets~~

	5	Significant accounting policies (continued)
	(h)	Impairment
	iii)	Impairment of exploration and evaluation (“E&E”) assets

The test for impairment of E&E assets,, included in Mineral properties not depreciated, can combine several CGUs as long as the combination is not larger than a segment. The definition of a CGU does, however, change once development activities have begun. There are ~~special~~specific impairment triggers for E&E assets. Despite certain relief in respect of impairment triggers and the level of aggregation, the impairment standard is applied in measuring the impairment of E&E assets. Reversals of impairment losses are required in the event that the circumstances that resulted in impairment have changed.

E&E assets are ~~only~~ assessed for impairment only when facts and circumstances suggest that the carrying amount of an E&E asset may exceed its recoverable amount. Indicators of impairment include the following:

The entity's right to explore in the specific area has expired or will expire in the near future and is not expected to be renewed.

Substantive expenditure on further E&E activities in the specific area is neither budgeted nor planned.

The entity has not discovered commercially viable quantities of mineral resources as a result of E&E activities in the area to date and has decided to discontinue such activities in the specific area.

Even if development is likely to proceed, the entity has sufficient data indicating that the carrying amount of the asset is unlikely to be recovered in full from successful development or by sale.

·	~~The entity's right to explore in the specific area has expired or will expire in the near future and is not expected to be renewed.~~(i)	Employee benefits
	i)	Short-term employee benefits

·	~~Substantive expenditure on further E&E activities in the specific area is neither budgeted nor planned.~~

·	~~The entity has not discovered commercially viable quantities of mineral resources as a result of E&E activities in the area to date and has decided to discontinue such activities in the specific area.~~

·	~~Even if development is likely to proceed, the entity has sufficient data indicating that the carrying amount of the asset is unlikely to be recovered in full from successful development or by sale.~~

~~(h)Employee benefits~~

~~(i)Short-term employee benefits~~

Short-term employee benefits are expensed when the related services are provided. A liability is recognised for the amount expected to be paid if the Group has a present legal or constructive obligation to pay this amount as a result of past service provided by the employee and the obligation can be estimated reliably.

~~(ii)Defined contribution plans~~

ii)

Defined contribution plans

A defined contribution plan is a post-employment benefit plan under which an entity pays fixed contributions into a separate entity and will have no legal or constructive obligation to pay further amounts. Obligations for contributions to defined contribution pension plans are recognised as an employee benefit expense in profit or loss in the periods during which services are rendered by employees. Prepaid contributions are recognised as an asset to the extent that a cash refund or a reduction in future payments is available. Contributions to a defined contribution plan that are due more than 12 months after the end of the period in which the employees render the service are discounted to their present value.

F-26

~~F-17~~

4~~Significant accounting policies – (continued)~~

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31,

2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

~~(I)~~	5	Significant accounting policies (continued)
	(j)	Share-based payment transactions

~~(i)~~

~~Equity settled~~i)

Equity-settled share-based payments to employees and directors

The grant date fair value of equity-settled share-based payment awards granted to employees and directors is recognised as an expense, with a corresponding increase in equity, over the vesting period of the award. The amount recognised as an expense is adjusted to reflect the number of awards for which the related service and non-market vesting conditions are expected to be met, such that the amount ultimately recognised as an expense is based on the number of awards that meet the related service and non-market vesting conditions at the vesting date.

Where the terms and conditions of ~~options~~equity-settled share-based payments are modified, ~~before they vest,~~ the increase in the fair value, ~~of the options,~~ measured immediately before and after the modification date, is ~~also~~ charged to profit or loss over the remaining vesting period or immediately for ~~awards already vested.~~ ~~Where~~vested awards. Similarly, where equity instruments are granted to non-employees, they are recorded at the fair value of the goods or services received in profit or loss.

Additional information about significant judgements, estimates and the assumptions used in the quantifying of the equity-settled share-based payment transactions and modification are disclosed in note 27.2.

~~(ii)~~

~~Cash settled~~ii)

Cash-settled share-based payments to employees and directors

The grant date fair value of ~~cash settled~~cash-settled awards granted to employees and directors is recognised as an expense, with a corresponding increase in the liability, over the vesting period of the awards. At each reporting date the fair value of the awards ~~are~~is re-measured with a corresponding adjustment to profit or loss. ~~In determining~~The method of calculating the fair value of ~~a cash settled~~the cash-settled share-based ~~payment at inception~~payments changed during quarter 1 of 2018 from the ~~transaction and on re-measurement date of the liability, the liability is measured by reference~~intrinsic valuation method to the ~~listed~~Black-Scholes method. The Black-Scholes method includes the effect of share ~~price when~~volatility in calculating the ~~option holder has similar rights to a shareholder. The listing price would be adjusted for the present~~fair value of the ~~expected dividends if the cash settled~~ share-based payment ~~has no dividend reinvestment option, as~~awards. The change was applied prospectively and did not have a significant effect on the ~~holder would not be entitled~~liability value. Additional information about significant judgements, estimates and the assumptions used to ~~similar rights as a shareholder.~~

estimate the fair value of cash-settled share-based payment transactions are disclosed in note 27.1.

~~(j)~~

(k)

Provisions

A provision is recognised if, as a result of a past event, the Group has a present legal or constructive obligation that can be estimated reliably, and it is probable that an outflow of economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation. Provisions are determined by discounting the expected future cash flows at a pre-tax rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the liability if the time value of money is considered significant. The unwinding of the discount is recognised as finance cost.

F-27

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

~~(k) Site restoration~~

5	Significant accounting policies (continued)
(l)	Site restoration

The Group recognises liabilities for statutory, contractual, constructive or legal obligations associated with the retirement of property, plant and equipment, when those obligations result from the acquisition, construction, development or normal operation of these assets. The net present value of future rehabilitation cost estimates arising from the decommissioning of plant and other site preparation work is ~~capitalized~~capitalised to mineral properties along with a corresponding increase in the rehabilitation provision in the period incurred. Future rehabilitation costs are discounted using a pre-tax ~~risk free~~risk-free rate that reflects the time-value of money. The Group’s estimates of rehabilitation costs, which are reviewed annually, could change as a result of changes in regulatory requirements, discount rates, effects of inflation and assumptions regarding the amount and timing of the future expenditures.

~~F-18~~

~~Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc~~

~~Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~For the years ended December 31~~

(~~in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise~~)

4~~Significant accounting policies – (continued)~~

~~(k) Site restoration - (continued)~~

These changes are recorded directly to mineral properties with a corresponding entry to the rehabilitation provision. ~~Changes resulting from an increased footprint due to gold production are charged to profit or loss for the year.~~ The cost of on-going current programs to prevent and control pollution is charged against profit or loss as incurred.

~~(l)~~(m)

Revenue

Revenue from the sale of precious metals is ~~recognized~~recognised when the metal is accepted at the refinery, ~~risk and benefits of ownership are~~control is transferred and when the receipt of proceeds ~~are~~is substantially assured. Revenue is measured at the fair value of the receivable at the date of the transaction.

~~(m) Government grants~~

(n)	Government grants

The Company recognises an unconditional government grant related to gold proceeds in profit or loss as other income when the grant becomes receivable. Government grants are initially recognised as deferred income at fair value if there is reasonable assurance that they will be received.

~~(n)Finance income and finance costs~~

(o)	Finance income and finance costs

Finance income comprises interest income on funds invested. Interest income is recognised as it accrues in profit or loss, using the effective interest method. Finance costs comprise interest expense on the rehabilitation provisions, interest on bank overdraft balances, effective interest on leases, loans and borrowings and ~~also~~ include commitment costs on overdraft facilities. ~~Borrowing~~Finance costs ~~that are not directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of a qualifying asset are~~is recognised in profit or loss using the effective interest ~~method.~~rate method and excludes borrowing costs capitalised.

F-28

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

~~(o)~~5	Significant accounting policies (continued)
(p)	Taxes
i)	Income tax

~~Income tax~~

Tax expense comprises current and deferred tax. ~~Current tax and deferred tax expense~~These expenses are recognised in profit or loss except to the extent that it relates to a business combination, or items recognised directly in equity or in other comprehensive income.

~~(i)~~ii)

Current tax

Current tax is the ~~expected~~ tax payable or receivable on the taxable income or loss for the year, using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date. Current tax ~~also~~ includes withholding tax on management fees and dividends paid between companies within the Group.

~~F-19~~

~~Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc~~

~~Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~For the years ended December 31~~

(~~in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise~~)

4	~~Significant accounting policies – (continued)~~

~~(ii)~~iii)

Deferred tax

Deferred tax is recognised in respect of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for taxation purposes. Deferred tax is not recognised for the following temporary differences: the initial recognition of assets or liabilities in a transaction that is not a business combination and that affects neither accounting nor taxable profit or loss, and differences relating to investments in subsidiaries to the extent that it is probable that they will not reverse in the foreseeable future. Deferred tax is a monetary item measured at the tax rates and in the currency that are expected to be applied towhen temporary differences ~~when they reverse,~~reverse. The tax and exchange rates are based on the laws that have been enacted, or substantively enacted byor the interbank exchange rates that prevail at the reporting date. A deferred tax asset is recognised for unused tax losses, tax credits and deductible temporary differences, to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profits will be available against which they can be utilised. Deferred tax assets are reviewed at each reporting date and are reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that the related tax benefit will be realised. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when there is a legally enforceable right to set off current tax assets against current tax liabilities and when they relate to income taxes levied by the same taxation authority and the Group intends to settle its current tax assets and liabilities on a net basis.

~~(p)~~(q)

Earnings per share

The Group presents basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) data for its shares. Basic EPS is calculated by dividing the adjusted profit or loss attributable to shareholders of the Group (see note ~~19)~~25) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period, adjusted for own shares held. Diluted EPS is determined by adjusting the profit or loss attributable to shareholders and the weighted average number of shares outstanding, adjusted for own shares held, for the effects of all dilutive potential shares, which comprise share options granted to employees and directors as well as any dilution in Group earnings originating from dilutive partially recognised non-controlling interests at a subsidiary level.

F-29

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

~~(q) Borrowing cost~~

5	Significant accounting policies (continued)
(r)	Borrowing cost

General and specific borrowing costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of a qualifying asset are capitalised during the period of time that is required to complete and prepare the asset for its intended use or sale. Qualifying assets are assets that necessarily take a substantial period of time to get ready for their intended use or sale.

Other borrowing costs are expensed in the period in which they are ~~incurred.~~incurred and recognised as finance costs.

(s)	Assets held for sale

Non-current assets, or disposal groups comprising assets and liabilities, are classified as held for sale if it is highly probable that they will be recovered primarily through sale rather than through continuing use.

Such assets, or disposal groups, are generally measured at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell. Impairment losses on initial classification as held for sale or held for distribution and subsequent gains and losses on remeasurement are recognised in profit or loss.

Once classified as held for sale property, plant and equipment are no longer amortised or depreciated.

F-30

~~F-20~~

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31,

2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

~~(r)~~T~~he following standards, amendments to standards and interpretations to existing standards may possibly have an impact on the Group:~~

5	Significant accounting policies (continued)
(t)	The following standards, amendments to standards and interpretations to existing standards may possibly have an impact on the Group:

Standard/Interpretation				Effective date and expected adoption date*
IAS 71&8	The ~~amendments provide for disclosures~~amendment clarifies the definition of material to make it easier to understand and provides guidance on how the definition should be applied. The change in the definition now ensures that ~~enable~~the definition is consistent across all IFRS standards and the Conceptual Framework.			January 1, 2020
	•	Old definition (IAS 1): Omissions or misstatements of items are material if they could, individually or collectively, influence the economic decisions that users make on the basis of the financial statements;
	•	New definition: Information is material if omitting, misstating or obscuring it could reasonably be expected to influence the decisions that the primary users of general-purpose financial statements ~~to evaluate changes~~make on the basis of those financial statements, which provide financial information about a specific reporting entity.
	The definition of material omissions or misstatements from IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in ~~liabilities arising from financing activities, including both changes arising from cash flow~~Accounting Estimates and ~~non-cash changes. This includes providing a reconciliation between the opening and closing balances for liabilities arising from financing activities.~~ Errors has been removed. The ~~amendment is not expected to result in significant~~ ~~changes~~ ~~other than providing the user~~final assessment of the ~~user with additional disclosure in the financial statements.~~			~~January 1, 2017~~
~~IAS 12~~	~~The amendments provide additional guidance on the existence of deductible temporary differences, which depend solely on a comparison~~impact of the ~~carrying amount of an asset and its tax base at the end of the reporting period, and is not affected by possible future changes~~amendment will be finalised in the carrying amount or expected manner of recovery of the asset. The amendments also provide additional guidance on the methods used to calculate future taxable profit to establish whether a deferred tax asset can be recognised. due course. The Group has ~~performed~~completed its assessment of the impact of IAS 1 and 8 and concluded that the new standard will not have a ~~preliminary assessment and expects no significant effect~~material impact on the ~~results.~~ consolidated financial statements.

IFRS 3	Amendment to IFRS 3 clarifies whether entities acquire a business or a group of assets. The amendments:			January 1, ~~2017~~2020
~~IFRS 15~~	~~This standard replaces IAS 11~~ ~~Construction Contracts, IAS 18~~ ~~Revenue, IFRIC 13~~ ~~Customer Loyalty Programmes, IFRIC 15~~ ~~Agreements for~~
	•	confirm that a business must include inputs and a process, and clarified that:
		°	the ~~Construction~~process must be substantive; and
		°	the inputs and process must together significantly contribute to creating outputs.

	•	narrow the definitions of ~~Real Estate, IFRIC 18~~ ~~Transfer~~a business by focusing the definition of ~~Assets~~outputs on goods and services provided to customers and other income from ~~Customers~~ordinary activities, rather than on providing dividends or other economic benefits directly to investors or lowering costs; and ~~SIC-31~~ ~~Revenue – Barter~~

	•	add a test that makes it easier to conclude that a company has acquired a group of ~~Transactions Involving Advertising Services~~. ~~The standard contains~~assets, rather than a business, if the value of the assets acquired is substantially all concentrated in a single ~~model that applies to contracts with customers and two approaches to recognising revenue: at a point in time~~asset or ~~over time. The model features a contract-based five-step analysis~~group of ~~transactions to determine whether, how much and when revenue is recognised.~~ similar assets.
	The Group has ~~performed a preliminary~~completed its assessment ~~and expects no significant effect on~~of the ~~results.~~			~~January 1, 2018~~
~~IFRS 9~~	~~On July 24, 2014, the IASB issued the final IFRS 9~~ ~~Financial Instruments~~ ~~Standard, which replaces earlier versions~~impact of IFRS 93 and ~~completes~~concluded that the ~~IASB’s project to replace IAS 39~~ ~~Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement. This~~new standard iswill not ~~expected to~~ have a ~~significant~~material impact on the Group as measurement categories are similar to IAS 39 even though the criteria for classification into these categories are significantly different. The IFRS 9 impairment model has also been changed from an “incurred loss” model from IAS 39 to an “expected credit loss” model. The change is not expected to increase the provision for bad debts recognised in the Group because of the short gold sales collection period. ~~The Group will adopt the standard in the first annual period beginning on or~~ ~~after January 1, 2018.~~ consolidated financial statements.	~~January 1, 2018~~
~~Standard/Interpretation~~		Effective date and expected adoption date*
~~IFRS 2 (Amendments)~~	~~The amendments cover three accounting areas:~~ Measurement of cash-settled share-based payments –The new requirements do not change the cumulative amount of expense that is ultimately recognised, because the total consideration for a cash-settled share-based payment is still equal to the cash paid on settlement. Classification of share-based payments settled net of tax withholdings –The amendments introduce an exception stating that, for classification purposes, a share-based payment transaction with employees is accounted for as equity-settled if certain criteria are met. ~~Accounting for a modification of a share-based payment from cash-settled to equity-settled –. The amendments clarify the approach that companies are to apply.~~ ~~The Group has performed a preliminary assessment and expects no significant effect on the results.~~	~~January 1, 2018~~
~~IFRS 16~~	IFRS 16 was published in January 2016. It sets out the principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of leases for both parties to a contract, i.e. the customer (‘lessee’) and the supplier (‘lessor’). IFRS 16 replaces the previous leases Standard, IAS 17 Leases, and related Interpretations. IFRS 16 has one model for lessees which will result in almost all leases being included on the Statement of Financial position. No significant changes have been included for lessors. ~~The Group has performed a preliminary assessment and expects no significant effect on the results.~~	~~January 1, 2019~~

F-31

* Annual periods ending on or after

~~F-21~~

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31,

2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

5	Significant accounting policies (continued)
(t)	The following standards, amendments to standards and interpretations to existing standards may possibly have an impact on the Group (continued):

Revised Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting	The IASB decided to revise the Conceptual Framework because certain important issues were not covered and certain guidance was unclear or out of date. The revised Conceptual Framework, issued by the IASB in March 2018, includes:		January 1, 2020
	•	New concepts on measurement including factors to be considered when selecting the measurement basis;
	•	New concepts on presentation and disclosure, including when to classify income and expenses in other comprehensive income;
	•	New guidance on when assets and liabilities are removed from financial statements;
	•	Updated definitions of an asset and liability;
	•	Updated recognition criteria for including assets and liabilities in financial statements; and
	•	Clarified the concepts of prudence, stewardship, measurement uncertainty and substance over form.
	The IASB also updated references to the Conceptual Framework in IFRS Standards by issuing amendments to references to the Conceptual Framework in IFRS Standards. The Group has completed its assessment of the impact and concluded that the new standard will not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

^*^{Annual periods ending on or after}

F-32

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

6	Blanket ~~Zimbabwe~~Mine Indigenisation Transaction

~~During~~

On February 20, 2012 the Group announced it had signed a Memorandum of Understanding (“MoU”) with the Minister of Youth, Development, Indigenisation and Empowerment of the Government of Zimbabwe pursuant to ~~comply with Zimbabwean law~~which the Group agreed that ~~requires~~ indigenous Zimbabweans ~~own at least~~would acquire an effective 51% ownership interest in the Zimbabwean company owning the Blanket Mine for a paid transactional value of $30.09 million. Pursuant to the above, members of the Group entered into agreements with each indigenous shareholder to transfer 51% of the ~~Blanket Mine, entered into agreements to transfer a 51%~~Group’s ownership interest in Blanket Mine ~~as follows:~~whereby it:

sold a 16% interest to the National Indigenisation and Economic Empowerment Fund (“NIEEF”) for $11.74 million;

sold a 15% interest to Fremiro Investments (Private) Limited (“Fremiro”), which is owned by indigenous Zimbabweans, for $11.01 million;

~~Sold a 16% interest to the National Indigenisation~~sold a 10% interest to Blanket Employee Trust Services (Private) Limited (“BETS”) for the benefit of present and future managers and employees for $7.34 million. The shares in BETS are held by the Blanket Mine Employee Trust (“Employee Trust”) with Blanket Mine’s employees holding participation units in the Employee Trust; and ~~Economic Empowerment Fund (“NIEEF”) for $11.74 million.~~

·	~~Sold a 15% interest to Fremiro Investments (Private) Limited (“Fremiro”), which is owned by Indigenous Zimbabweans, for $11.01 million.~~

donated a 10% ownership interest to the Gwanda Community Share Ownership Trust (“Community Trust”). In addition, Blanket Mine paid a non-refundable donation of $1 million to the Community Trust.

Sold a 10% interest to Blanket Employee Trust Services (Private) Limited (“BETS”) for the benefit of present and future managers and employees for $7.34 million. The shares in BETS are held by the Blanket Mine Employee Trust (“Employee Trust”) with Blanket Mine’s employees holding participation units in the Employee Trust.

·	And donated a 10% ownership interest to the Gwanda Community Share Ownership Trust (“Community Trust”). In addition Blanket Mine paid a non-refundable donation of $1 million to the Community Trust.

The Group facilitated the vendor funding of these transactions which is repaid by way of dividends from Blanket Mine. 80% of dividends declared by Blanket Mine are used to repay such loans and the remaining 20% unconditionally accrues to the respective ~~Indigenous Shareholders.~~

~~Outstanding~~indigenous shareholders. Following a modification to the interest rate on June 23, 2017, outstanding balances on ~~the~~these facilitation loans attract interest at a rate of ~~10% over~~ the ~~12-month LIBOR.~~lower of a fixed 7.25% per annum payable quarterly or 80% of the Blanket Mine dividend in the quarter. The timing of the repayment of the loans depends on the future financial performance of Blanket Mine and the extent of future dividends declared by Blanket Mine.

The facilitation loans relating to the Group were transferred as ~~a dividend~~dividends in specie intra Group and now the loans and most of the interest thereon is payable to the Company.

On November 5, 2018 the Company and Fremiro entered into a ~~wholly-owned subsidiary~~sale agreement for Caledonia to purchase Femiro’s 15% shareholding in Blanket Mine. As at December 31, 2019 the transaction remained subject to, amongst other things, approvals from various Zimbabwean regulatory authorities to be effective. In terms of the sale agreement, the Company planned to issue 727,266 shares at $7.15 per share to Fremiro for the cancellation of their facilitation loan which stood at $11,467 as at June 30, 2018 and the purchase of their 15% shareholding in Blanket Mine, increasing the Company’s total shareholding in Blanket Mine to 64%. On January 21, 2020 the Company announced that all regulatory approvals were obtained and the transaction became effective. The Company continues to consolidate Blanket Mine in the consolidated financial statements.

F-33

Caledonia Mining Corporation ~~Plc.~~Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

6	Blanket Mine Indigenisation Transaction (continued)

Accounting treatment

The directors of Caledonia ~~Holding~~Holdings Zimbabwe (Private) Limited (“CHZ”), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, performed ~~an assessment,~~a re-assessment, using the requirements of IFRS 10: Consolidated Financial Statements (IFRS 10), and concluded that CHZ should continue to consolidate Blanket Mine after the indigenisation and accordingly the subscription agreements with the indigenous shareholders have been accounted for ~~the~~as a transaction with non-controlling interests and as a share based payment transaction.

The subscription agreements, concluded on February 20, 2012, were accounted for as follows:

Non-controlling interests (“NCI”) were recognised on the portion of shareholding upon which dividends declared by Blanket Mine will accrue unconditionally to equity holders as follows:

·	~~Non-controlling interests (NCI) are recognised on the portion of shareholding upon which dividends declared by Blanket Mine accrue unconditionally to equity holders as follows:~~

-(a)	20% of the 16% shareholding of NIEEF;

(b)

20% of the 15% shareholding of Fremiro; and

(c)

100% of the 10% shareholding of the Community Trust.

This effectively means that NCI is recognised at 16.2% of the net assets of Blanket Mine.

~~F-22~~

~~Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc~~

~~Notes~~The remaining 80% of the shareholding of NIEEF and Fremiro is recognised as non-controlling interests to the ~~Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~For~~extent that their attributable share of the ~~years ended~~net asset value of Blanket Mine exceeds the balance on the facilitation loans including interest. At December 31, 2019 the attributable net asset value did not exceed the balance on the respective loan accounts and thus no additional NCI was recognised.

(~~in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise~~)

5~~Blanket Zimbabwe Indigenisation Transaction – (continued)~~

·	~~This effectively means that NCI is recognised at Blanket Mine level at 16.2% of the net assets.~~

·•

The remaining 80% of the shareholding of NIEEF and Fremiro is recognised as non-controlling interests to the extent that their attributable share of the net asset value of Blanket Mine exceeds the balance on the facilitation loans including interest. At December 31, 2016 the attributable net asset value did not exceed the balance on the respective loan accounts and thus no additional NCI was recognised.

The transaction with ~~the~~ BETS is accounted for in accordance with IAS 19 Employee Benefits (profit sharing arrangement) as the ownership of the shares does not ultimately pass to the employees. The employees are entitled to participate in 20% of the dividends accruing to the 10% shareholding in Blanket Mine if they are employed at the date of such distribution. To the extent that 80% of the attributable dividends exceed the balance on the BETS facilitation loan they will accrue to the employees at the date of such declaration.

The Employee Trust and BETS are entities effectively controlled and consolidated by Blanket Mine. Accordingly, the shares held by BETS are effectively treated as treasury shares in Blanket Mine and no NCI is recognised.

Amendments to the facilitation and advanced dividend loan agreements

Interest modification

On June 23, 2017, the Group, Blanket Mine and the indigenous shareholders of Blanket Mine reached agreement to change the interest terms of the facilitation and advanced dividend loan agreements. The agreements changed the interest rate from the previously agreed 12-month LIBOR + 10% to the lower of a fixed 7.25% per annum, payable quarterly or 80% of the Blanket Mine dividend in the quarter. The modification was considered beneficial to the indigenous shareholders and gave rise to an equity-settled share-based expense of $806 on June 23, 2017 when all parties reached agreement to modify the interest charged. It was agreed that the interest change was to be applied to the facilitation and advanced dividend loan balances from January 1, 2017. The assumptions and methodologies used to quantify the equity-settled share-based payment expense relating to the beneficial interest modification are detailed in note 27.2.

F-34

·	The Employee Trust and BETS are structured entities which are effectively controlled and consolidated by Blanket Mine. Accordingly, the shares held by BETS are effectively treated as treasury shares in Blanket Mine and no NCI is recognised.

Blanket’s indigenisation shareholding percentages and facilitation loan balances
Balance of facilitation loan #

USD 000's
Shareholding NCI Recognised NCI subject to facilitation loan Dec, 31 2016

Dec, 31 2015
NIEEF 16% 3.2% 12.8% 11,990 11,907
Fremiro 15% 3.0% 12.0% 11,682 11,657
Community Trust 10% 10.0% - - -
BETS 10% -* -* 7,788 7,772
51% 16.2% 24.8% 31,460 31,336

~~F-23~~

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31,

2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

6	Blanket Mine Indigenisation Transaction (continued)

Amendments to the facilitation and advanced dividend loan agreements (continued)

Blanket Mine’s indigenisation shareholding percentages and facilitation loan balances
							Balance of facilitation loan #
$ 000's	Shareholding		NCI Recognised		NCI subject to facilitation loan			Dec, 31, 2019	Dec, 31 2018
NIEEF	16	%	3.2	%	12.8	%		11,877	11,876
Fremiro (refer note 38(b))	15	%	3.0	%	12.0	%		11,458	11,466
Community Trust	10	%	10.0	%	-			-	-
BETS	10	%	-	*	-	*		7,639	7,644
	51	%	16.2	%	24.8	%		30,974	30,986

5~~Blanket Zimbabwe Indigenisation Transaction – (continued)~~

The balance on the facilitation loans is reconciled as follows:

Balance at January 1, ~~2015~~2018	~~31,336~~31,052
Interest accrued^&	-2,173
Dividends used to repay loans^&	-
~~Balance at December 31, 2015~~	~~31,336~~
~~Interest accrued~~ ^&	~~1,359~~
~~Dividends used to repay loans~~ ^&	(~~1,235~~2,239	)
Balance at December 31, ~~2016~~2018	~~31,460~~30,986
Interest accrued	1,609
Dividends used to repay loans	(1,621	)
Balance at December 31, 2019	30,974

*The shares held by BETS are effectively treated as treasury shares (see above). The BETS facilitation loan earnings are accounted for under IAS19 Employee Benefits as an employee charge under Production cost.

^&~~An interest moratorium was placed on all facilitation loans from December 31, 2014 to August 1, 2016. Interest resumed when Blanket Mine’s started paying dividends on August 1, 2016.~~

# Facilitation loans are accounted for as equity instruments and are accordingly not recognised as loans receivable.

Advance dividends

In anticipation of completion of the underlying subscription agreements, Blanket Mine agreed to an advance dividend arrangements with NIEEF and the Community Trust as follows:

Advances made to the Community Trust against their right to receive dividends declared by Blanket Mine on their shareholding as follows:

•	a $2 million payment on or before September 30, 2012;

•	a $1 million payment on or before February 28, 2013; and

•	a $1 million payment on or before April 30, 2013.

F-35

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

6	Blanket Mine Indigenisation Transaction (continued)

Advance dividends (continued)

·~~A $2 million payment on or before September 30, 2012;~~

·~~A $1 million payment on or before February 28, 2013; and~~

·~~A $1 million payment on or before April 30, 2013.~~

These advance payments were debited to a loan account bearing interest at a rate at the lower of ~~10% over~~a fixed 7.25% per annum, payable quarterly or the ~~12-month LIBOR.~~ Blanket Mine dividend in the quarter to the advanced dividend loan holder. The loan is repayable by way of set off of future dividends on the Blanket Mine shares owed by the Community Trust.

Advances made to NIEEF as an advanced dividend loan before 2013 ~~has been~~were settled through Blanket Mine dividend repayments in fiscal 2014.

~~F-24~~

~~Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc~~

~~Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~For the years ended December 31~~

(~~in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise~~)

~~5 Blanket Zimbabwe Indigenisation Transaction – (continued)~~

The advance dividend payments were recognised as distributions to shareholders and they are classified as equity instruments. The loans arising are not recognised as loans receivable, because repayment is by way of uncertain future ~~dividends to be declared.~~

dividends.

The movement in the advance dividend loan to the Community ~~trust~~Trust is reconciled as follows:

	Total

Balance at January 1, ~~2015~~2018		~~3,237~~2,604
Interest accrued		-
~~Dividends used to repay advance dividends~~		-
~~Balance at December 31, 2015~~		~~3,237~~
~~Interest accrued~~		~~133~~174
Dividends used to repay advance dividends		(~~370~~725	)
Balance at December 31, ~~2016~~2018		~~3,000~~2,053
Interest accrued		104
Dividends used to repay advance dividends		(525	)
Balance at December 31, 2019		1,632

~~Blanket has suspended dividend payments from January 1, 2015 until August 1, 2016 as a result of which the repayment of facilitation loans by Blanket’s indigenous shareholders were also suspended.~~ ~~A moratorium was placed on the interest of the advanced dividend loan until such time as dividends resumed, no repayments were made or interest accumulated from December 31, 2014 until July 31, 2016.~~ ~~This was considered a modification that was not beneficial to Blanket’s indigenous shareholders.~~ ~~Dividends and interest resumed on~~ ~~August 1, 2016, when Blanket Mine declared a dividend~~.

6~~Financial risk management~~

7	Financial risk management

Overview

The Group has exposure to the following risks from its use of financial instruments:

Currency risk (refer note 31)

Interest rate risk (refer note 31)

·	~~Currency risk (refer note 25)~~

Credit risk (refer note 31)

·	~~Interest rate risk (refer note 25)~~

Liquidity risk (refer note 31)

·	~~Credit risk (refer note 25)~~

Market risk (refer note 31)

·	~~Liquidity risk (refer note 25)~~

This note and note 2531 presents information about the Group’s exposure to each of the above risks and the Group’s objectives, policies and processes for measuring and managing risk. Further quantitative disclosures are included throughout these consolidated financial statements. The Group is exposed in varying degrees to a variety of financial instrument related risks by virtue of its activities. The overall financial risk management

~~F-25~~

~~Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc~~

~~Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~For the years ended December 31~~

(~~in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise~~)

6~~Financial risk management – (continued)~~

program focuses on preservation of capital, and protecting current and future Group assets and cash flows by reducing exposure to risks posed by the uncertainties and volatilities of financial markets. The Board of Directors has responsibility to ensure that an adequate financial risk management policy is established and to approve the policy. The Group’s Audit Committee oversees management’s compliance with the Group’s

F-36

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

7	Financial risk management (continued)

financial risk management policy. ~~On February 10, 2016, a gold~~Gold price ~~hedge was~~hedges were entered into to manage the possible effect of gold price ~~fluctuations~~fluctuations. The derivative financial instrument was entered into by the Company for economic hedging purposes and ~~expired in August 2016. As at December 31, 2016 no financial instruments were in place to manage the gold price risk.~~not as a speculative investment. The fair value of the Group’s financial instruments approximates their carrying value ~~unless otherwise noted.~~due to the short period to maturity. The types of risk exposure and the way in which such exposures are managed are described below:

(a)

Currency risk

The Group is exposed to currency risk on inter-company sales and purchases that are denominated in a currency other than the respective functional currencies of Group entities. The Group does not use financial instruments to hedge its exposure to currency risk. ~~Currency~~To reduce exposure to currency transaction risk, on the ~~repayment of~~Group regularly reviews the ~~sales~~currency (i.e. RTGS$ or Foreign currency) in which it spends its cash to identify and ~~purchases are managed by regular repayments of~~avoid specific expenditures in currencies that experience inflationary pressures. Further the ~~outstanding amounts.~~

Group aims to maintain cash and cash equivalents in US Dollar to manage foreign exchange exposure.

(b)

Interest rate risk

The Group is exposed to interest rate risk arising from its cash and cash equivalents invested with financial institutions as well as its overdraft facility and term loan. ~~Management’s policy is to invest cash in financial institutions with an investment grade credit-rating.~~ The ~~Company~~Group has not entered into interest rate swap agreements and mitigates the interest rate risk by remaining in a positive consolidated net cash position.

(c)

Credit risk

Credit risk includes the risk of a financial loss to the Group if a gold sales customer fails to meet its contractual obligation. Gold sales were made to Fidelity ~~Printers and Refiners~~ in Zimbabwe during the year. ~~The payment terms stipulated in the service delivery contract were adhered to in all circumstances.~~

(d)

Liquidity risk

Liquidity risk is the risk that the Group will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they fall due.

The Group manages its liquidity risk by ensuring that there is sufficient cash to meet its likely cash requirements, after taking into account cash flows from operations and the Group’s holdings of cash and cash equivalents. The Group believes that these sources will be sufficient to cover the anticipated cash requirements. Senior management is also actively involved in the review and approval of planned expenditures by regularly monitoring cash flows from operations and anticipated investing and financing activities.

(e)

Market risk

Market risk is the risk that changes in the gold price will affect the group’s profitability. The objective of market risk management is to manage and control market risk exposures within acceptable parameters, while optimising returns. Hedges were entered into by the Company for economic hedging purposes to ensure sufficient cash availability for Blanket Mine’s capital investment plan, rather than as a speculative investment, refer to note 16 for details on hedge transactions entered into.

F-37

~~F-26~~

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31,

2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

7~~Capital Management~~

8	Capital Management

The Group’s objectives when managing capital are to safeguard its ability to continue as a going concern in order to pursue the mining operations and exploration potential of the mineral properties. The Group’s capital includes shareholders’ equity, comprising issued share capital, reserves, accumulated other comprehensive income, accumulated deficit, bank loans and non-controlling interests.

	2019	2018

Total equity	124,717	78,808

2016 2015 2014

Total equity 59,317 50,361 50,343

The Group’s primary objective with respect to its capital management is to ensure that it has sufficient cash resources to maintain its on-going operations, to provide returns for shareholders and accommodate any rehabilitation provisions and to pursue growth opportunities. As at December 31, ~~2016,~~2019, the Group is not subject to externally imposed capital requirements ~~other than the term loan which is covered by a notarial bond over moveable assets (refer notes 13 and 22)~~ and there has been no change with respect to the overall capital risk management strategy. ~~Management is~~

9	Production costs

	2019		2018		2017

Salaries and wages		13,905		13,160		13,440
Cash-settled share-based payments (note 27.1(a))		107		43		311
Consumable materials		13,020		12,143		9,916
Electricity costs		6,383		9,313		8,701
Site restoration		-		84		58
Pre-feasibility exploration cost		301		411		410
Safety		525		592		323
On mine administration		2,159		3,569		3,004
Other production cost		-		-		17
		36,400		39,315		36,180

10	Other income

	2019		2018		2017

Government grant – Gold sale export incentive		866		6,482		2,446
Government grant – Gold support price		1,064		-		-
Other		94		39		148
Greenstone Retirement Fund pay-out		250		-		-
Greenstone Provident Fund pay-out		-		363		-
Eersteling rock dump sale		-		217		-
		2,274		7,101		2,594

F-38

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of ~~the opinion that the capital is sufficient to safeguard its ability to continue as a going concern and maintain operations and exploration potential of the mineral properties.~~United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

8~~Production costs~~

2016 2015 2014

Salaries and wages 12,206 11,908 10,014
Consumable materials 16,291 14,479 14,565
Site restoration 32 - 29
Exploration cost not capitalised 408 380 343
Safety 221 551 473
On mine administration 2,898 2,701 2,484
Other production cost 30 - -
32,086 30,019 27,908

~~9.1Other income~~

2016 2015 2014
Government grant – Gold sale export incentive 1,104 - -
Non-refundable deposit – Eersteling Gold Mining Company Limited 120 - -
Other 106 110 25
1,330 110 25

10	Other income (continued)

Government grant – Gold sale export incentive

From May 2016 the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe announced ~~a 2.5%~~an export credit incentive (“ECI”) on the gold proceeds received for all large scale gold mine producers. ~~In terms of~~On January 1, 2018 the ~~directive the Blanket Mine will receive 2.5%~~export credit incentive decreased from 3,5% to 2,5% and on ~~all gold proceeds sold~~February 1, 2018, increased to ~~Fidelity Printers and Refiners Limited. As at the approval date of these financial statements all export incentive payments outstanding as at December 31, 2016 were received in cash.~~10%. All incentives granted by the Zimbabwean government were included in other income when determined receivable. All receipts were received in Blanket Mine’s RTGS$ account. In the monetary policy statement issued on February 20, 2019 the RBZ announced the cancellation of the ECI.

Government grant – Gold support price

From March 6, 2019 it became apparent that Blanket Mine’s sales proceeds received from Fidelity were calculated at a gross price of $44,000 per kilogram ($1,368.58 per ounce), which exceeded the prevailing London Bullion Market Association (“LBMA”) price. On May 12, 2019 the Company received confirmation from Fidelity of this windfall receipt, called the “gold support price”, which has been implemented to incentivise gold producers to increase gold production. The gold support price has not been increased as the LMBA gold price has subsequently increased above $1,368.58 per ounce.

Greenstone Retirement Fund pay-out

The Greenstone Retirement Fund (the “Fund”) was established with the aim to provide retirement benefits to employees of mines previously owned by Caledonia Mining South Africa Proprietary Limited. A surplus remained in the Fund after all members were retrenched or terminated in 1997 when the mines were closed. The Financial Services Board in South Africa appointed a tribunal that liquidated the Fund and concluded that the surplus of ZAR 3,6 million ($250) that remained in the Fund to be paid out to the former employer. On October 25, 2019 the surplus was paid out to Caledonia Mining South Africa Proprietary Limited.

11	Impairment loss on trade receivables

	2019	2018	2017

Impairment - 2017 royalty rebate	-	-	181

During 2016 Blanket Mine obtained a rebate on royalty payments made in 2015 of $181 for incremental gold production in 2016 compared to production in 2015. A receivable was recognised for the royalty amount overpaid to the revenue authorities in 2016 based on the pre-award rate. An impairment provision of $Nil (2018:Nil; 2017: $181) was raised against the receivable outstanding in 2017. The Zimbabwean government has been unable to put in place the modalities of implementing the royalty on incremental gold sales across the gold industry as a whole.

F-39

~~F-27~~

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31,

2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

9~~Other income (continued)~~

~~Government grant – Gold sale export incentive (continued)~~

~~Non-refundable deposit – Eersteling Gold Mining Company Limited~~

12	Net foreign exchange gain/(loss)

On ~~July 12, 2016~~October 1, 2018 the ~~Group entered into an agreement~~RBZ issued a directive to ~~sell~~Zimbabwean banks to separate foreign currency from RTGS$ on the ~~shares~~accounts held by their clients and ~~claims of Eersteling Gold Mining Company Limited. On September 19, 2016 in~~pegged the ~~second addendum~~RTGS$ at 1:1 to the ~~agreement it~~US Dollar. On February 20, 2019 the RBZ issued a further monetary policy statement, which allowed inter-bank trading between RTGS$ and foreign currency. The interbank rate was ~~agreed that the Group will receive a non-refundable deposit in addition~~introduced at 2.5 RTGS$ to ~~the initial agreed sale amount that was agreed upon in July, 2016. As~~1 US Dollar and traded at 16,77 RTGS$ to 1 US Dollar as at December 31, ~~2016~~2019. On June 24, 2019 the ~~sale~~Government issued S.I. 142 which stated “Zimbabwe dollar (RTGS$) to be the sole currency for legal tender purposes for any transactions in Zimbabwe ”. Throughout these announcements and to the date of issue of these financial statements the US Dollar has remained the primary currency in which the Group’s Zimbabwean entities operate and the functional currency of these entities.

Previously there was uncertainty as to what currency would be used to settle amounts owed to the Zimbabwe Government. The announcement of S.I. 142 clarified the Zimbabwean Government’s intentions that these liabilities were always denominated in RTGS$ and that RTGS$ would be the currency in which they would be settled. The devaluation of the ~~shares~~deferred tax and ~~claims were not considered highly probable as 100% of~~electricity liabilities contributed the ~~sale of shares and claims receivable and a significant~~largest portion of the ~~non-refundable deposit were outstanding and outside~~foreign exchange gain set out below.

The table below illustrates the effect the weakening of the ~~agreed upon payment dates~~RTGS$ and other non-RTGS$ currencies had, against the US Dollar, on the statement of ~~the second addendum. Up to December 31, 2016 an amount of $120 was received~~profit or loss and other comprehensive income.

	2019			2018			2017

Unrealised Foreign exchange gain(loss)		31,411			230			(379	)
Realised foreign exchange loss		(1,750	)		(7	)		(1	)
Net foreign exchange gain/(loss)		29,661			223			(380	)

Leases

Leases as ~~part of the non-refundable deposit and was recognised as other income.~~

~~9.2 Sale of Treasury Bills~~

~~On May 16, 2016 the Company announced that Blanket Mine had sold treasury bills (“Bills”) issued by the Government of Zimbabwe~~lessee

The Group leases administrative offices. The leases typically run for a ~~gross value~~period of ~~approximately $3,202.~~3 to 6 years, with an option to renew the lease after that date. The ~~Bills~~two leases over the administrative offices expire in 2021 and 2025 respectively.

Previously, leases were ~~issued to Blanket in 2015~~classified as operating leases under IAS 17. Information about leases for which ~~replaced~~ the Special Tradeable Gold Bonds (“Bonds”) which were issued to Blanket in 2009 as part consideration for gold sales that were made by Blanket in 2008 under the terms of the sales mechanism that existed at that time for Zimbabwean gold producers. The Bonds were carried atGroup is a ~~fair value of nil in previous years and the impairment was allowed as a tax deduction.~~lessee is presented below.

F-40

10~~Administrative expense~~

2016 2015 2014

Investor relations 543 513 514
Audit fee 267 240 356
Legal fee and disbursements 617 452 722
Advisory services fee 373 355 24
Listing fees 328 206 318
Directors fees company 211 191 298
Directors fees Blanket 48 60 38
Employee costs 2,803 3,106 3,152
Office costs - Zambia 17 716 896
Other office administration costs 185 547 16
Unrecoverable VAT expenses and penalties - 298 -
Employee benefits relating to indigenisation - - 140
Travel costs 484 325 303
Donation to community - 58 -
Eersteling Gold Mine administration costs 111 111 120
Professional consulting fees 1,276 444 490
7,263 7,622 7,387

~~F-28~~

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31,

2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

11~~Finance income~~

13	Leases (continued)

Right of use assets

Right of use assets related to leased properties that do not meet the definition of investment property are presented as property, plant and ~~finance costs~~equipment (refer note 18).

	2019

Balance at January 1	263
Depreciation charge for the year	(112	)
Additions to Right of use assets	248
Derecognition of Right of use assets	(64	)
Foreign currency movement	2
Balance at December 31	337

ii)

Amounts recognised in profit or loss

			2019
Leases under IFRS 16
Interest on lease liabilities			17

			2018
Operating leases under IAS 17
Lease expense			105

iii)

Amounts recognised in statement of cash flows

Finance income 2016 2015 2014

Interest received – Bank 16 1 14

Finance cost

Interest paid – Bank 103 49 20
Interest paid – Capitalised to Property, plant and equipment (note 13) (103 ) - -
Unwinding of rehabilitation provision 25 43 33
Interest – South African Revenue Service - 344 -
Finance charges – Overdraft 167 100 101
192 536 154

			2019

Total cash outflow for leases			124

12~~Tax expense~~

2016 2015 2014
Tax recognised in profit or loss

Current tax 3,106 (197) 5,276
Income tax– current year 2,414 506 4,582
Income tax – Prior year under/(over) provision 49 (1,636) (194)
Withholding tax expense 643 933 888
Deferred tax expense 4,611 2,567 706
Origination and reversal of temporary differences 4,611 2,567 468
Change in effective tax rate - - 238

Tax expense – recognised in profit or loss 7,717 2,370 5,982

~~Tax recognised in other comprehensive income~~

Income tax - current year
- (199 ) (111 )
Tax expense
7,717 2,171 5,871

~~Unrecognised deferred tax assets~~

Deferred tax assets have not been recognised in respect of the following items: 2016 2015 2014

Tax losses carried forward 4,989 *11,150
^*19,957
4,989 11,150 19,957

*Tax losses carried forward in 2015 include an

An amount of ~~$6,243~~$349 was recognised as part of Trade and other payables as at December 31, 2019 relating to ~~losses when Caledonia Mining Corporation was domiciled in Canada. These losses expired after~~ the ~~Company re-domiciled to Jersey, Channel Islands through a process called the Continuance and its name changed to Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc.~~above leases.

F-41

~~F-29~~

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31,

2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

14	Administrative expense

	2019		2018		2017

Investor relations		414		751		541
Audit fee		237		266		231
Advisory services fees		408		553		684
Listing fees		277		495		402
Directors fees Company		240		225		247
Directors fees Blanket Mine		31		52		40
Employee costs		3,030		2,917		2,781
Eersteling Gold Mine administration cost		17		212		142
Other office administration costs		691		697		444
Travel costs		292		297		399
		5,637		6,465		5,911

15	Finance income and finance costs

Finance income	2019			2018			2017

Interest received – Bank		146			53			38

Finance cost

Interest – Term loan (note 28)		165			92			155
Interest – Capitalised to Property, plant and equipment (note 18)		(165	)		(92	)		(155	)
Unwinding of rehabilitation provision		20			20			25
Finance charges – Leases (note 13)		17			-			-
Finance charges – Overdraft		307			253			44
		344			273			69

F-42

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

16	Gold hedge

12The Company entered into a 5-month hedge in respect of 4,500 ounces of gold per month from February to June 2019 through the purchase of put options with a strike price of $1,250 per ounce. The gold price never went below $1,250 per ounce and the hedge was concluded at a cost of $324.

The Company entered into a new hedge in November 2019 at a cost of $379. The new hedge was in the form of put options in respect of 4,600 ounces of gold per month for the period January to June 2020 exercisable at a strike price of $1,400 per ounce. At December 31, 2019 the mark-to-market valuation, that represents the fair value of the hedge amounted to $102 (2018: Nil).

17	Tax expense

	2019		2018			2017
Tax recognised in profit or loss

Current tax		7,311		3,783			4,995
Income tax– current year		6,802		2,523			3,702
Income tax – Prior year under provision		29		1,075			71
Withholding tax expense – current year		480		580			1,222
Withholding tax expense – Prior year over provision		-		(395	)		-
Deferred tax expense		2,979		3,662			3,696
Origination and reversal of temporary differences		2,979		3,662			3,696

Tax expense – recognised in profit or loss		10,290		7,445			8,691

Tax ~~expense - (continued)~~recognised in other comprehensive income

Income tax - current year		-				-				-
Tax expense			10,290				7,445				8,691

F-43

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

17	Tax expense (continued)

Unrecognised deferred tax assets

	2019		2018		2017

Eersteling Gold Mining Company Limited		-		4,989		4,989
Caledonia Holdings Zimbabwe (Private) Limited		421		-		-
Greenstone Management Services Holdings Limited		276		191		116
Tax losses carried forward		697		5,180		5,105

Taxable losses do not expire for the entities incurring taxable losses within the ~~group.~~Group. Tax losses carried forward relate to Greenstone Management Services Holdings Limited (UK) and Caledonia Holdings Zimbabwe (Private) Limited. Unrecognised tax losses of Eersteling Gold Mining Company Limited amounted to $5 for 2019 and the unrecognised tax losses relating to the entity were transferred with the sale of the entity. Deferred tax assets have not been recognised in these entities as future taxable income is not deemed probable to utilise these losses against.

Tax paid	2019			2018			2017

Net income tax payable at January 1		(1,538	)		(1,145	)		(345	)
Current tax expense		(7,310	)		(3,783	)		(4,995	)
Foreign currency movement		3,168			46			(17	)
Tax paid		5,517			3,344			4,212
Net income tax payable at December 31		(163	)		(1,538	)		(1,145	)

F-44

Tax paid 2016 2015 2014

Net income tax receivable/(payable) at January 1 344 (1,617 ) (1,064 )
Current and withholding (expense)/tax credit (3,106 ) 197 (5,276 )
Income tax expense recognised through other comprehensive income - 199 111
Foreign currency movement (49 ) 103 86
Tax paid 2,466 1,462 4,526
Net income tax (payable)/receivable at December 31 (345 ) 344 (1,617 )

Net income tax 2016 2015 2014

Income tax receivable - 397 95
Income tax payable (345 ) (53 ) (1,712 )
Net income tax (payable)/receivable (345 ) 344 (1,617 )

~~F-30~~

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31,

2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

12~~Tax expense - (continued)~~

17	Tax expense (continued)

Reconciliation of tax rate

	2019			2018			2017
Profit for the year		50,401			13,756			11,896
Total tax expense		10,290			7,445			8,691
Profit before tax		60,691			21,201			20,587

Income tax at Company's domestic tax rate ⁽¹⁾		-			-			-
Tax rate differences in foreign jurisdictions ⁽²⁾		16,232			6,465			6,546
Effect of income tax calculated in RTGS$ as required by PN26 ⁽³⁾		(8,526	)		-			-
Management fee – Withholding tax on deemed dividend portion ⁽⁴⁾		224			337			538
Management fee – non-deductible deemed dividend ⁽⁴⁾		652			579			925
Management fee – withholding tax current year		129			96			427
Management fee – non-deductible withholding tax prior year ⁽⁵⁾		-			(664	)		-
Withholding tax on intercompany dividend		128			110			90
Non-deductible royalty expenses		933			882			901
Other non-deductible expenditure		39			137			107
Export incentive income credit relating to 2016		-			-			(284	)
Export incentive income exemption ⁽⁶⁾		(124	)		(1,649	)		(630	)
Change in tax estimates
- Zimbabwean income tax (7)		29			795			-
- South African income tax		63			220			-
- Other		-			61			(45	)
Change in unrecognised deferred tax assets		511			76			116
Tax expense - recognised in profit or loss		10,290			7,445			8,691

⁽¹⁾

^{Enacted tax rate in Jersey, Channel Islands is 0% (2018: 0%; 2017: 0%)}

⁽²⁾

^{Subsidiaries registered in Zimbabwe and South Africa are subject to a corporate tax rate of 25,75% and 28% respectively.}

⁽³⁾

^{In 2019 ZIMRA issued PN26 that was effected retrospectively from February 22, 2019. The public notice provided clarity on Section 4 (a) of the Finance Act [Chapter 23.04] of Zimbabwe, that requires a company earning taxable income to pay tax in the same or other specified currency that the income is earned. PN 26 clarifies that the calculation of taxable income be performed in RTGS$ and that the payment of the tax be paid in the ratio of the currency that the turnover is earned. The reconciliating item reconciles the profit before tax calculated using US Dollars as the functional currency of the Zimbabwean entities to taxable income calculated in RTGS$.}

⁽⁴⁾

^{Zimbabwean tax legislation changed during 2017 that gave rise to an additional withholding tax of 15% going forward on a portion of the intercompany management fee considered to be a deemed dividend. The new legislation resulted in this portion of the management fee being not deductible for income tax purposes in Zimbabwe from January 1, 2017.}

⁽⁵⁾

^{Withholding tax on the management fee was provided for and paid at 15% in 2017. However, in the second quarter of 2018 management obtained confirmation from the ZIMRA that the withholding tax rate was reduced to 5% from February 1, 2017. The ZIMRA allowed an amount of $395 to be offset against outstanding income tax liabilities in Zimbabwe. The overpayment of withholding taxes on the management fee also resulted in a change of estimate reducing the 2017 non-deductible withholding tax in the South African subsidiary amounting to $269, estimated at 15%, to 5%. The change in estimate was accounted for prospectively in the 2018 year.}

⁽⁶⁾

^{On March 23, 2018, the ZIMRA enacted a new finance act that provided for the export credit incentive to be tax exempt. The 2018 finance bill indicated that the export incentive income will be tax exempt from June 1, 2017. The new finance bill resulted in an income tax credit being applied in the 2018 income tax calculation giving rise to a credit for the export incentive income of 2017.}

⁽⁷⁾

^{During the second quarter of 2018 management revised its estimated management fee fair value previously deducted against taxable income in the prior years. Management approached ZIMRA and reached a settlement on the amount allowed as a deduction. No penalties or interests were incurred.}

F-45

2016 2016 2015 2015 2014 2014
% % %
Profit for the year 11,085 5,590 5,946
Total tax expense 7,717 2,370 5,982
Profit before tax 18,802 7,960 11,928

Income tax at Company's domestic tax rate
^*0%
- 26.5% 2,109 26.5% 3,161
Tax rate differences in foreign jurisdictions 6,171 (63) (349)
Change in tax rate - - 238
Foreign currency difference - (12) 34
Net withholding tax 476 317 185
Deemed interest on loans - 31 636
Share-based payments 122 6 -
Impairment - - 37
Non-deductible South African tax transactions - 470 -
Royalties 753 632 881
Donations 2 15 3
Other non-deductible expenditure 62 (49) 27
Under/(over) provision of taxes in prior years 49 (1,636) (194)
Change in unrecognized deferred tax assets 82 550 1,323
Tax expense - recognised in profit or loss 7,717 2,370 5,982

* The domestic income tax rate of the Company changed from 26.5% to 0% after it re-domiciled from Canada to Jersey Channel Islands.

~~F-31~~

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31,

2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

12~~Tax expense - (continued)~~

17	Tax expense (continued)

Recognised deferred tax assets and liabilities

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are attributable to the following:

	Assets				Liabilities						Net
	2019		2018		2019			2018			*2019			*2018

Property, plant and equipment		-		-		(4,195	)		(24,930	)		(4,195	)		(24,930	)
Allowance for obsolete stock		22		258					-			22			258
Prepayments		-		-		(4	)		(3	)		(4	)		(3	)
Unrealised foreign exchange		309		34		-			-			309			34
Trade and other payables		739		-		-			-			739			-
Share based payments		5		13		-			-			5			13
Provisions		58		1,386		-			-			58			1,386
Other		-		12		-			-			-			12
Tax assets/ (liabilities)		1,133		1,703		(4,199	)		(24,933	)		(3,066	)		(23,230	)

Assets Liabilities Net
2016 2015 2014 2016 2015 2014 2016
^*2015
2014

Property, plant and equipment - - - (17,092 ) (12,988 ) (9,223 ) (17,092 ) (12,988 ) (9,223 )
Provision for obsolete stock 12 - - - - - 12 - -
Prepayments - - - (3 ) (3 ) (22 ) (3 ) (3 ) (22 )
Provisions 1,218 733 565 - - - 1218 733 565
Assessed losses recognised - 998 - - - - - 998 -
Tax assets/ (liabilities) 1,230 1,731 565 (17,095 ) (12,991 ) (9,245 ) (15,865 ) (11,260 ) (8,680 )

^* The deferred tax liability consists of a deferred tax asset of ~~$44 (2015: $58)~~$63 (2018: $98) from the South African ~~operations~~operation and a net deferred tax liability of ~~$15,909 (2015: $11,318)~~$3,129 (2018: $23,328) due to the Zimbabwean ~~operations.~~operation. The amounts are in different tax jurisdictions and ~~therefore not offsetable and~~cannot be offset. The amounts are presented ~~separately in the Statement~~as part of ~~financial position as a~~ Non-current ~~asset~~assets and a Non-current ~~liability.~~liabilities in the Statements of financial position. The deferred tax asset recognised is supported by evidence of probable future taxable income.

Movement in recognised deferred tax assets and liabilities

	Balance January 1, 2019			Recognised in profit or loss			Foreign exchange movement			Balance December 31, 2019
Property, plant and equipment		(24,930	)		(4,561	)		25,296			(4,195	)
Allowance for obsolete stock		258			11			(247	)		22
Prepayments		(3	)		-			(1	)		(4	)
Unrealised foreign exchange		34			519			(244	)		309
Trade and other payables		486			1,093			(840	)		739
Share based payments		13			(9	)		1			5
Provisions		852			11			(805	)		58
Other		60			(43	)		(17	)		-
Total		(23,230	)		(2,979	)		23,143			(3,066	)

	Balance January 1, 2018			Recognised in profit or loss			Foreign exchange movement			Balance December 31, 2018
Property, plant and equipment		(20,985	)		(3,945	)		-			(24,930	)
Allowance for obsolete stock		35			223			-			258
Prepayments		(4	)		-			1			(3	)
Unrealised foreign exchange		97			(63	)		-			34
Trade and other payables		429			57			-			486
Share based payments		12			3			(2	)		13
Provisions		813			47			(8	)		852
Other		48			16			(4	)		60
Total		(19,555	)		(3,662	)		(13	)		(23,230	)

F-46

Balance
January 1,
2016
Recognised in profit or loss Foreign exchange movement
Balance
December 31,
2016

Property, plant and equipment
(12,988 ) (4,104 ) - (17,092 )
Prepayments
(3 ) 2 (2 ) (3 )
Provisions
733 477 8 1218
Provision for obsolete stock
- 12 - 12
Assessed loss
998 (998 ) - -
Total
(11,260 ) (4,611 ) 6 (15,865 )

~~F-32~~

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31,

2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

18	Property, plant and equipment

	Land and buildings			Mine development, infrastructure and other			Exploration and Evaluation assets		Plant and equipment			Fixtures and fittings			Motor vehicles			Total
Cost
Balance at January 1, 2018		9,434			61,498			6,967		27,881			943			2,329			109,052
Additions^**		-			18,719			-		899			202			95			19,915
Impairments^***		-			(60	)		-		(529	)		(216	)		(17	)		(822	)
Assets held for sale		(140	)		(74	)		-		-			-			-			(214	)
Reallocations between asset classes		1,068			(5,525	)		-		4,457			-			-			-
Foreign exchange movement		(23	)		(49	)		-		(33	)		(6	)		(5	)		(116	)
Balance at December 31, 2018		10,339			74,509			6,967		32,675			923			2,402			127,815

Balance at January 1, 2019		10,339			74,509			6,967		32,675			923			2,402			127,815
Initial recognition of right of use assets		409			-			-		-			-			-			409
Additions^**		267			19,020			172		897			88			151			20,595
Impairments^***		-			-			-		(144	)		-						(144	)
Disposals		(212	)		-			-		-			-			(16	)		(228	)
Reallocations between asset classes		25			(2,989	)		-		2,964			-			-			-
Foreign exchange movement		5			2			-		3			7			1			18
Balance at December 31, 2019		10,833			90,542			7,139		36,395			1,018			2,538			148,465

12~~Tax expense - (continued)~~

Balance
January 1,
2015

Recognised in
profit or loss

Foreign exchange movement

Balance
December 31,
2015

Property, plant and equipment
(9,223 ) (3,765 ) - (12,988 )
Prepayments
(22 ) 16 3 (3 )
Provisions
565 184 (16 ) 733
Assessed loss recognised
- 998 - 998
Total
(8,680 ) (2,567 ) (13 ) (11,260 )

Balance
January 1,
2014

Recognised in
profit or loss

Foreign exchange movement

Balance
December 31,
2014

Property, plant and equipment
(8,058 ) (835 ) (330 ) (9,223 )
Prepayments
- - (22 ) (22 )
Provisions
207 108 250 565
Inventory
(80 ) - 80 -
Other
(36 ) 21 15 -
Total
(7,967 ) (706 ) (7 ) (8,680 )

~~F-33~~

~~Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc~~

~~Notes~~

There are commitments to ~~the Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~For the years ended December 31~~

(~~in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise~~)

13~~Property,~~purchase plant and equipment

Land and buildings Mine development, infrastructure and other Exploration and Evaluation assets Plant and equipment Fixtures and fittings Motor vehicles Total
Cost
Balance at January 1, 2014 7,622 12,145 17,129 20,079 1,220 2,075 60,270
Additions 536 *2,990 1,768 1,740 114 18 7,166
Disposals - - - (275 ) - (8 ) (283 )
Reallocations between asset classes (580 ) 1,661 - (1,084 ) 3 - -
Foreign exchange movement 30 92 (3,684 ) 508 (145 ) (114 ) (3,313 )
Balance at December 31, 2014 7,608 16,888 15,213 20,968 1,192 1,971 63,840
Balance at January 1, 2015 7,608 16,888 15,213 20,968 1,192 1,971 63,840
Additions 681 *14,359 1,595 1,144 149 265 18,193
Surrender of Zambian assets ^***
- - (11,527 ) - - - (11,527 )
Disposals - - - (124 ) - (77 ) (201 )
Reallocations between asset classes (256 ) - 1,012 (756 ) - - -
Foreign exchange movement (44 ) (89 ) (69 ) (606 ) (64 ) (90 ) (962 )
Balance at December 31, 2015 7,989 31,158 6,224 20,626 1,277 2,069 69,343
Balance at January 1, 2016 7,989 31,158 6,224 20,626 1,277 2,069 69,343
Additions^**
- *17,545 739 572 73 230 19,159
Scrappings - - - - (502 ) - (502 )
Reallocations between asset classes 361 (3,699 ) - 3,338 - - -
Disposals (55 ) (55 )
Foreign exchange movement 17 74 4 - 28 11 134
Balance at December 31, 2016 8,367 45,078 6,967 24,536 876 2,255 88,079

totalling $560 (2018: $3,981) at year end.

* Included in additions to mine development, infrastructure and other assets is an amount of ~~$557 (2015: $$391)~~$1,882 (2018: $1,958) relating to rehabilitation asset capitalised, refer note ~~20.~~

26.

** Included in additions is an amount of ~~$17,731 (2015:$26,192)~~$20,093 (2018: $19,323) relating to capital work in progress (“CWIP”) and contains ~~$103 (2015:$ Nil)~~$165 (2018: $61) of borrowing costs ~~capitalized~~capitalised from the term loan. As at year end ~~$34,086~~$76,847 of CWIP was included in the closing balance ~~(2015:26,152)~~(2018: $62,624).

*** The ~~Group surrendered all exploration rights relating~~auto-tap transformer was written off due to the ~~Zambian operations for a nominal value. The Zambian assets were fully impaired in previous years.~~large voltage fluctuations at Blanket Mine that caused it to burn out.

F-47

~~There are commitments to purchase plant and equipment totalling $2,122 (2015: $1,376; 2014: $552) at year end.~~

~~F-34~~

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31,

2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

18	Property, plant and equipment (continued)

	Land and buildings			Mine development, infrastructure and other		Exploration and Evaluation assets		Plant and equipment			Fixtures and fittings			Motor vehicles			Total
Accumulated depreciation and Impairment losses
Balance at January 1, 2018		3,636			5,172		-		15,382			761			2,023			26,974
Depreciation for the year		775			649		-		2,404			99			144			4,071
Impairments		-			-		-		(429	)		(170	)		(15	)		(614	)
Foreign exchange movement		-			-		-		-			(41	)		(2	)		(43	)
Balance at December 31, 2018		4,411			5,821		-		17,357			649			2,150			30,388

Balance at January 1, 2019		4,411			5,821		-		17,357			649			2,150			30,388
Initial recognition of right of use assets		146			-		-		-			-			-			146
Depreciation for the year		1,005			504		-		2,693			99			133			4,434
Impairments		-			-		-		-			-			-			-
Disposals		(149	)		-		-		-			-			(16	)		(165	)
Foreign exchange movement		-			-		-		-			5			6			11
Balance at December 31, 2019		5,413			6,325		-		20,050			753			2,273			34,814

Carrying amounts
At December 31, 2018		5,928			68,688		6,967		15,318			274			252			97,427
At December 31, 2019		5,420			84,217		7,139		16,345			265			265			113,651

F-48

13~~Property, plant and equipment~~

Land and buildings Mine development, infrastructure and other Exploration and Evaluation assets Plant and equipment Fixtures and fittings Motor vehicles Total
Accumulated depreciation and Impairment losses
Balance at January 1, 2014 1,621 2,642 13,400 9,243 994 1,098 28,998
Depreciation for the year 514 734 - 1,891 78 323 3,540
Impairment - -
^-
164 14 - 178
Disposals - - - (214 ) - (8 ) (222 )
Foreign exchange movement (372 ) 59 (1,873 ) (954 ) (140 ) (110 ) (3,390 )
Balance at December 31, 2014 1,763 3,435 11,527 10,130 946 1,303 29,104

Balance at January 1, 2015 1,763 3,435 11,527 10,130 946 1,303 29,104
Depreciation for the year 559 451 - 1,894 98 320 3,322
Surrender of Zambian assets ^***
- - (11,527 ) - - - (11,527 )
Disposals - - - (117 ) - (51 ) (168 )
Foreign exchange movement (1 ) (105 ) - (383 ) (48 ) (69 ) (606 )
Balance at December 31, 2015 2,321 3,781 - 11,524 996 1,503 20,125

Balance at January 1, 2016 2,321 3,781 - 11,524 996 1,503 20,125
Scrappings - - - - (502 ) - (502 )
Impairments - - - - 20 - 20
Depreciation for the year 629 699 - 1,705 106 352 3,491
Disposals - - - - - (8 ) (8 )
Foreign exchange movement - 61 - - 22 (3 ) 80
Balance at December 31, 2016 2,950 4,541 - 13,229 642 1,844 23,206

*** The Group surrendered all exploration rights relating to the Zambian operations for a nominal value. The Zambian assets were fully impaired in previous years.

~~F-35~~

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31,

2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

18	Property, plant and equipment (continued)

Economic recovery

Items of Property, plant and equipment ~~- (continued)~~

Carrying amounts
At December 31, 2014 5,845 13,453 3,686 10,838 246 668 34,736
At December 31, 2015 5,668 27,377 6,224 9,102 281 566 49,218
At December 31, 2016 5,417 40,537 6,967 11,307 234 411 64,873

~~F-36~~

~~Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc~~

~~Notes~~are depreciated over the LoMP, which includes planned production from inferred resources. These inferred resources are included in the calculation when the economic recovery thereof is demonstrated by the achieved recovered grade relative to the ~~Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~For~~mine’s pay limit for the ~~years ended December 31~~

(period 2006 to 2018. The pay limit has ranged from 2.3 g/t in ~~thousands~~2008 to 2.1. g/t in 2019 while the recovered grade has ranged from 4.0 g/t to 3.26 g/t over the period. All-in-sustaining-cost^* has remained consistently below the gold price received over this period resulting in economic recovery of ~~United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise~~the inferred resources.

* All-in sustaining cost (“AISC”)

13~~Property, plant~~ per ounce, is calculated as the on-mine cost per ounce to produce gold (which includes production costs before intercompany eliminations and ~~equipment - (continued)~~

~~Impairment indicators~~

~~Management’s budgeted capital expenditure for 2017 is focused on increasing~~exploration costs) plus royalty paid, additional costs incurred outside the mine (i.e. at offices in Harare, Johannesburg, London and Jersey), costs associated with maintaining the operating infrastructure and resource base that are required to maintain production ~~capacity~~ at the ~~Blanket Mine (“Investment Plan”). It was therefore decided to place~~current levels (sustaining capital investment), the ~~satellite properties, GG~~share-based expense arising from the LTIP less silver by-product revenue and ~~Mascot, on care and maintenance until there are sufficient funds to re-commence~~ the planned further exploration and evaluation of the orebodies, gold extraction processes and mining methods at these areas. Due to the impairment indicator, management assessed the recoverability of the investment in these satellite properties and determined that no impairment was required as at December 31, 2016. The discounted cash flow method was used to calculate the recoverable amount using the assumptions below:export incentive credit

19	Inventories

	2019		2018

Consumable stores		10,716		9,210
Gold in process		376		217
		11,092		9,427

Long-term gold price per oz. $ 1,192
Discount rate 20 %
Life of mine
- GG 7 yrs
- Mascot 5 yrs
Incremental operational cost per tonne (at 100 tonnes per day)
- GG $ 42
- Mascot $ 44

14~~Inventories~~

2016 2015

Consumable stores 6,884 5,739
Gold in process 338 352
7,222 6,091

Consumables stores are disclosed net of any write downs or provisions for obsolete items, which amounted to ~~$862 (2015: $46)~~$912 (2018: $911).

20	Trade and other receivables

	2019		2018

Bullion revenue receivable		2,987		2,695
VAT receivables		1,765		2,743
Deferred consideration on the disposal of subsidiary		1,991		-
Deposits for stores and equipment and other receivables		169		954
		6,912		6,392

15~~Trade and other receivables~~

2016 2015

Bullion revenue receivable 1,059 -
VAT receivables 1,901 2,997
Deposits for stores and equipment and other receivables 465 842
3,425 3,839

The Group's exposure to credit and currency risks, and impairment losses related to trade and other receivables is disclosed in notes 67 and ~~25.~~31. The net carrying value of trade receivables is considered a reasonable approximation of fair value and are short-term in nature. Refer to note 22.1 for terms of deferred consideration on the disposal of subsidiary. No provision for expected credit losses were recognised as all scheduled payments were received up to the date of approval of these financial statements and non-payment of Trade and other receivables were not foreseen.

F-49

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

16~~Cash and cash equivalents~~

21	Cash and cash equivalents

	2019			2018

Bank balances		9,383			11,187
Cash and cash equivalents in the statement of financial position		9,383			11,187
Bank overdrafts used for cash management purposes		(490	)		-
Net cash and cash equivalents at year end		8,893			11,187

2016 2015

Bank balances 14,335 12,568
Cash and cash equivalents in the statement of financial position 14,335 12,568
Bank overdrafts used for cash management purposes - (1,688 )
Net cash and cash equivalents at year end 14,335 10,880

The Group’s exposure to interest rate risk and a sensitivity analysis for financial assets and liabilities is disclosed in note ~~25.~~31.

	Denomination RTGS$		Interest rate
Overdraft facilities
Stanbic Bank		15,000,000		25	%
First Capital Bank		10,000,000		26	%

22	Eersteling

22.1	Sale of subsidiary

On May 31, 2018 the Group entered into an amended share sale agreement with SH Mineral Investments Proprietary Limited (“SH Minerals”) to sell the shares and claims of Eersteling Gold Mining Company Limited (“Eersteling”), a South African subsidiary previously consolidated as part of the Group, that has been on care and maintenance since 1997. The amended share sale agreement allowed for a purchase price of $3 million which would be settled by three payments of $1 million payable on the completion date, 12 and 18 months after the completion date. On January 31, 2019 all suspensive conditions for the sale were met and the Group transferred the registered and beneficial ownership of Eersteling to SH Minerals. During 2019, $1 million was received and $901 was received post year end as payment towards the purchase price.

F-50

~~On August 23, 2016 Blanket Mine arranged an unsecured bank overdraft facility~~

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of ~~$2,000~~United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

22	Eersteling (continued)

22.1	Sale of subsidiary (continued)

Details of ~~which full~~the disposal are as follows:

Carrying amounts of net assets over which control was lost:	2019
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment		227

Current assets
Trade and other receivables		84
Total assets		311

Non-current liabilities
Rehabilitation provision		650

Current liabilities
Trade and other payables		8
Total liabilities		658

Consideration receivable:
Cash received		1,000
Deferred consideration (at January 31, 2019)		1,953
Total consideration		2,953

Profit on sale of subsidiary:
Net liabilities derecognised		347
Cumulative exchange differences in respect of the net liabilities of the subsidiary reclassified from equity on loss of control of subsidiary		2,109
Fair value of consideration receivable (at January 31, 2019)		2,953
Profit on sale of subsidiary		5,409

At the date of approval of these financial statements $1,000 remained outstanding from SH Minerals and is expected to be received in July of 2020 and a further $99 remains outstanding from SH Minerals from the amount ~~was unutilised~~payable in January 2020 and is expected to be received shortly.

22.2	Disposal group held for sale

As at December 31, ~~2016. The overdraft facility bears interest~~2018, management concluded that the Eersteling disposal group will be recovered principally through a sale transaction rather than through continuing use and that the sale of Eersteling had become highly probable as one of the two suspensive conditions in the new share sale agreement had been met.

F-51

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

22	Eersteling (continued)

22.2	Disposal group held for sale (continued)

As at ~~6.5% per annum, 4.65% above~~December 31, 2018 the ~~base rate and has a $20 arrangement fee over a 12 month period with a review date of August 31, 2017. The facility is repayable on demand.~~disposal group held for sale was stated at its carrying amount.

	2019		2018
Non-current assets
Property, plant, and equipment		-		214

Current assets
Trade and other receivables		-		80
Cash and cash equivalents		-		2
Assets held for sale		-		296

Non-current liabilities
Rehabilitation provision		-		602

Current liabilities
Trade and other payables		-		7
Liabilities associated with assets held for sale		-		609

23	Share capital

17Authorised~~Share capital~~

~~Authorised~~

Unlimited number of ordinary shares of no par value.

Unlimited number of preference shares of no par value.

	Number of fully paid shares^*			Amount
Issued ordinary shares
January 1, 2017		10,651,936			55,002
Shares repurchased		(118,063	)		(146	)
Issued during the year		69,280			246
December 31, 2017		10,603,153			55,102
Issued during the year		-			-
December 31, 2018		10,603,153			55,102
Issued during the year (refer note 27.1)		159,888			963
December 31, 2019		10,763,041			56,065

* Amounts stated after the 1:5 share consolidation effected June 26, 2017.

F-52

Issued shares
Number of fully paid shares Amount
January 1, 2014
52,117,908

54,569

December 31, 2014

52,117,908

54,569

Cancelled*

(39,000
)

-

December 31, 2015

52,078,908

54,569

Issued

708,520

433

December 31, 2016

52,787,428

55,002

* 39,000 treasury shares of the Company were cancelled during 2015.

~~The holders of shares are entitled to receive dividends as declared from time to time, and are entitled to one vote per share at meetings of the Group. The Company has no preference shares in issue.~~

~~F-37~~

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31,

2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

18~~Reserves~~

Reserves

Foreign currency translation reserve

The translation reserve comprises all foreign currency differences arising from the translation of the financial statements of foreign operations with functional currencies that differ from the presentation currency.

Share-based payment reserve

The share-based payment reserve comprises the fair value of equity instruments granted to employees, directors and service providers under share option plans and equity instruments issued to Blanket’s ~~indigenisation~~indigenous shareholders under ~~Blanket’s~~Blanket Mine’s Indigenisation Transaction (refer ~~Note 5)~~note 6).

Contributed surplus

The contributed surplus reserve comprises the reduction in stated capital as approved by shareholders at the special general meeting on January 24, 2013 ~~so as~~ to be able to commence dividend payments.

Reserves

	2019			2018			2017

Foreign currency translation reserve		(8,621	)		(6,561	)		(5,885	)
Equity-settled share-based payment reserve (note 27.2)		16,760			16,760			16,746
Contributed surplus		132,591			132,591			132,591
Total		140,730			142,790			143,452

F-53

~~Reserves~~

2016

2015

2014

Foreign currency translation reserve

(6,258
)

(6,520
)

(3,229
)
Equity settled share-based payment reserve

16,041

15,871

15,847

Contributed surplus

132,591

132,591

132,591

Total

142,374

141,942

145,209

19~~Earnings per share~~

~~Basic earnings per share~~

The calculation of basic earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2016 was based on the adjusted profit attributable to shareholders of $8,288 (2015: $4,679; 2014: $4,387), and a weighted average number of shares outstanding of 52,286,208 (2015: 52,095,087; 2014: 52,117,908).

~~F-38~~

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31,

2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

19~~Earnings per share – (continued)~~

25	Earnings per share

Weighted average number of shares

(In number of shares) Note 2016 2015 2014

Issued share capital at beginning of year 17 52,078,908 52,117,908 52,117,908
Weighted average cancellation during the year - (22,821 ) -
Weighted average share issues during the year 207,300 - -
Weighted average number of shares at December 31 52,286,208 52,095,087 52,117,908

2016 2015 2014
Profit attributable to shareholders 8,526 4,779 4,435
Blanket Mine Employee Trust Adjustment (238 ) (100 ) (48 )
Adjusted profit attributable to shareholders 8,288 4,679 4,387
Basic earnings per share -$ 0.16 0.09 0.08

·	~~Basic earnings are adjusted for the amounts that accrue to other equity holders of subsidiaries upon the full distribution of post-acquisition earnings to shareholders.~~

Diluted earnings is calculated on the basis that the unpaid ownership interests of Blanket Mine’s Indigenisation shareholders are effectively treated as options whereby the weighted average fair value for the period of the Blanket Mine shares issued to Indigenous Zimbabweans and which are subject to settlement of the loan accounts is compared to the balance of the loan accounts and any excess portion is regarded as dilutive. The difference between the number of Blanket Mine shares subject to the settlement of the loan accounts and the number of Blanket Mine shares that would have been issued at the average fair value is treated as the issue of shares for no consideration and regarded as dilutive shares. The calculated dilution is taken into account with additional earnings attributable to the dilutive shares in Blanket Mine, if any.

The interest of NIEEF and Fremiro shareholding were anti-dilutive in the current and prior year (i.e. the value of the options was less than the outstanding loan balance) and accordingly there was no adjustment to fully diluted earnings attributable to shareholders.

~~F-39~~

~~Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc~~

~~Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~For the years ended December 31~~

(~~in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise~~)

19~~Earnings per share~~ – ~~(continued)~~

~~The calculation of diluted~~Basic earnings per share ~~at December 31, 2016 was based on the adjusted profit attributable to shareholders of $8,288 (2015: $4,679; 2014: $4,387), and a weighted~~

(In number of shares)	Note	2019		2018		2017

Issued number of shares at the beginning of year	23		10,603,153		10,603,153		52,787,428
Share consolidation			-		-		(42,135,492	)
Issued shares post consolidation			10,603,153		10,603,153		10,651,936
Weighted average shares repurchased			-		-		(60,978	)
Weighted average shares issued			138,736		-		16,924
Weighted average number of shares at December 31			10,741,889		10,603,153		10,607,882

Weighted average number of shares ~~and potentially dilutive shares outstanding of 52,403,635 (2015: 52,203,255; 2014: 52,145,469), calculated as follows:~~– Diluted earnings per share

(In number of shares)	2019		2018		2017

Issued number of shares at the beginning of year		10,603,851		10,603,153		10,607,882
Effect of dilutive options		143,267		698		9,622
Weighted average number of shares (diluted) at December 31		10,747,118		10,603,851		10,617,504

~~Weighted average number of shares~~

(In number of shares) 2016 2015 2014

Weighted average number of shares at December 31 52,286,208 52,095,087 52,117,908
Effect of dilutive options 117,427 108,169 27,561
Weighted average number of shares (diluted) at December 31 52,403,635 52,203,255 52,145,469
Diluted earnings per share - $ 0.16 0.09 0.08

The average market value of the Company’s shares for purposes of calculating the dilutive effect of share options was based on quoted market prices for the year during which the options were outstanding. Options of ~~343,973 (2015: 2,132,751; 2014: 2,538,359)~~32,771 (2018: 37,302; 2017: 18,378), were excluded from the dilutive earnings per share calculation as these options were anti-dilutive.

The quantity of options outstanding as at year end that were out of the money amounted to 18,000 (2018: 18,000) options.

F-54

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

25	Earnings per share (continued)

The calculation of total basic and diluted earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2019 was based on the adjusted profit attributable to shareholders as follows:

	2019			2018			2017
Profit for the year attributable to owners of the Company (basic and diluted)		42,018			10,766			9,384
Blanket Mine Employee Trust Adjustment		(986	)		(280	)		(210	)
Profit attributable to ordinary shareholders (basic and diluted)		41,032			10,486			9,174
Basic earnings per share - $		3.82			0.99			0.86
Diluted earnings per share - $		3.81			0.99			0.86

Basic earnings are adjusted for the amounts that accrue to other equity holders of subsidiaries upon the full distribution of post-acquisition earnings to shareholders.

Diluted earnings is calculated on the basis that the unpaid ownership interests of Blanket Mine’s indigenous shareholders are effectively treated as options whereby the weighted average fair value for the period of the Blanket Mine shares issued to the indigenous shareholders and which are subject to settlement of the loan accounts is compared to the balance of the loan accounts and any excess portion is regarded as dilutive. The difference between the number of Blanket Mine shares subject to the settlement of the loan accounts and the number of Blanket Mine shares that would have been issued at the average fair value is treated as the issue of shares for no consideration and regarded as dilutive shares. The calculated dilution is taken into account with additional earnings attributable to the dilutive shares in Blanket Mine, if any. The interest of the NIEEF and Fremiro shareholdings were anti-dilutive in the current and prior year (i.e. the value of the options was less than the outstanding loan balance) and accordingly there was no adjustment to fully diluted earnings attributable to shareholders.

F-55

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

2026	Provisions

Site restoration

Site restoration relates to ~~the net present value of~~ the estimated cost of closing down ~~a mine~~the mines and represents the site and environmental restoration costs, estimated to be paid throughout the period up until ~~2030 for~~closure due to areas of environmental disturbance present at the reporting date as a result of mining activities. In the case of Blanket Mine the costs of site restoration are discounted based on the estimated life of mine. Site restoration costs at Blanket ~~mine~~Mine are capitalised to mineral properties depreciated at initial recognition and amortised systematically over the estimated life of the mine for costs relating to the decommissioning of property, plant and equipment.


Reconciliation of site restoration provision	2019		2018
Balance at January 1		3,309		3,797
Reclassified to Liabilities associated with assets held for sale		-		(602	)
Foreign exchange movement		-		(97	)
Unwinding of discount		20		20
Rehabilitation performed		-		(54	)
Change in estimate during the year
- adjusted through profit or loss		-		84
- adjustment capitalised in Property, plant and equipment		17		161
Balance at December 31		3,346		3,309

Reconciliation of site restoration provision 2016 2015 2014
Balance at January 1, 2,762 2,484 1,470
Foreign exchange movement

80
252525
(156 ) (64 )
Unwinding of discount 25 43 33
Change in estimate during the year
- adjusted through profit or loss
32 - 29
- adjustment capitalised in Property, plant and equipment
557 391 1,016
Balance at December 31, 3,456 2,762 2,484

The discount rates currently applied in the calculation of the net present value of the Blanket ~~mine~~Mine provision is ~~0.86% (2015: 1.07%; 2014: 2,32%~~2.31% (2018: 2.95%), based on a ~~risk free~~risk-free rate and cash flows estimated at 0%an average 2.27% inflation ~~(2015: 0%~~(2018: 2.13%). The ~~Eersteling mine is under care~~gross rehabilitation costs before discounting amounted to $3,603 (2018: $3,604) for Blanket Mine as at December 31, 2019.

27	Share-based expenses

27.1	Cash-settled share-based expense

The Group has separately disclosed the following cash-settled share-based payment arrangements in the statements of profit or loss and ~~maintenance and~~other comprehensive income for the ~~provision is not discounted.~~years ended December 31:

	Note	2019		2018		2017

Restricted Share Units and Performance Units	27.1.(a)		616		218		853
Caledonia Mining South Africa employee incentive scheme	27.1.(b)		73		97		123
			689		315		976

F-56

~~F-40~~

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31,

2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

2027	~~Provisions –~~Share-based expenses (continued)

~~Site restoration– (continued)~~

27.1	Cash-settled share-based expense (continued)

(a)

Restricted Share Units and Performance Units

Certain key management members were granted Restricted Share Units (“RSUs”) and Performance Units (“PSUs”) pursuant to provisions of the 2015 Omnibus Equity Incentive Compensation Plan. All RSUs and PSUs were granted and approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.

The ~~gross rehabilitation costs before discounting~~RSUs will vest three years after grant date given that the service condition of the relevant employees is fulfilled. The value of the vested RSUs will be the number of RSUs vested multiplied by the fair market value of the Company’s shares, as specified by the Plan and in the award agreements, on date of settlement.

The PSUs have a service condition and a performance period of three years. The performance condition is a function of production cost, gold production and central shaft depth targets on certain specified dates. The number of PSUs that will vest will be the PSUs granted multiplied by a performance multiplier, which will reflect the actual performance in terms of the performance conditions compared to expectations on the date of the award.

RSU holders are entitled to receive dividends over the vesting period. Such dividends will be reinvested in additional RSUs at the then applicable share price calculated at the average Bank of Canada noon rate immediately preceding the dividend payment. PSUs have rights to dividends only after they have vested.

The fair value of the RSUs, at the reporting date, was based on the Black Scholes option valuation model. The fair value of the PSUs, at the reporting date, was based on the Black Scholes option valuation model less the fair value of the expected dividends during the vesting period multiplied by the performance multiplier expectation. At the reporting date it was assumed that there is a 93%-100% probability that the performance conditions will be met and therefore a 93%-100% (2018: 85%; 2017: 94%) average performance multiplier was used in calculating the estimated liability. The liability as at December 31, 2019 amounted to ~~$3,159 (2015: $3,006; 2014: $2,486) for Blanket mine and $571 (2015: $459; 2014: $616) for Eersteling mine.~~

21~~Share-based payments~~

Note 2016 2015 2014
Equity settled share-based payments 21.1 170 - -
Cash settled share-based payments 21.2 618 - -
788 - -

~~21.1Equity settled share-based payments~~

At$524 (December 31, 2018: $2,043). Included in the liability as at December 31, ~~2016~~2019 is an amount of $107 (December 31, 2018: $43; December 31, 2017: $311) that was expensed and classified as production costs; refer note 9. During the ~~Group has~~year PSUs and RSUs to the value of $2,243 vested of which $963 was issued as share capital.

F-57

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

27	Share-based expenses (continued)

27.1	Cash-settled share-based expense (continued)

(a)	Restricted Share Units and Performance Share Units (continued)

The following ~~Equity settled~~assumptions were used in estimating the fair value of the cash-settled share-based payment ~~arrangements:~~liability on December 31:

	2019					2018
	RSUs		PSUs			RSUs		PSUs
Fair value ($)	$	8.46		$8.19		$	5.46	$	5.46
Share price ($)	$	8.46		$8.46		$	5.46	$	5.46
Performance multiplier percentage		-	93	-	100%		-		85	%

Share units granted:

	RSUs			PSUs			RSUs		PSUs
Grant - January 11, 2016		60,645			242,579			60,645		242,579
Grant - March 23, 2016		10,965			43,871			10,965		43,871
Grant - June 8, 2016		5,117			20,470			5,117		20,470
Grant - January 19, 2017		4,443			17,774			4,443		17,774
Grant – January 19, 2019		-			124,027			-		-
Grant – June 8, 2019		-			14,672			-		-
RSU dividend reinvestments		11,316			-			10,960		-
Settlements		(87,434	)		(306,920	)
Total awards at December 31		5,052			156,473			92,130		324,694

On January 11, 2020 and January 19, 2020 an aggregate of 121,332 PSUs and 17,585 RSUs were awarded executives as well as to certain senior management of the companies in the Group.

(b)	Caledonia Mining South Africa employee incentive scheme

From July 2017, Caledonia Mining South Africa Proprietary Limited granted 52,282 awards respectively to certain of its employees that entitle them to a cash pay-out at the Company’s share price on November 30 each year over a 3-year period from the grant date. The cash-settled share-based payment liability was calculated based on the number of awards expected to vest multiplied by the Company’s Black Scholes option valuation fair value of £6.07 at the reporting date and apportioned for the quantity vested over the total vesting period. The liability relating to these cash-settled share-based payment awards amounted to $16 (December 31, 2018: $47) and the expense amounted to $73 (December 31, 2018: $97; December 31, 2017: $123) for the year ended December 31, 2019. The following assumptions were used in estimating the fair value of the cash-settled share-based payment liability on December, 31:

	2019			2018
	Awards
Grant - July 2017 (3-year term)		37,330			37,330
Grant - August 2018 (3-year term)		5,918			5,918
Grant - August 2019 (3-year term)		9,034			-
Awards paid out		(44,985	)		(26,864	)
Total awards outstanding December 31		7,297			16,384

Estimated awards expected to vest at December 31		100	%		100	%

F-58

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

~~(a) Share option programme~~

27	Share-based expenses (continued)

27.2	Equity-settled share-based expense

The Group has ~~established a new~~expensed the following equity-settled share-based payment arrangements for the years ended December 31:

	Note	2019		2018		2017
Share option programmes	27.2 (a)		-		14		29
Facilitation and advanced dividend loan modification	27.2 (b)		-		-		806
			-		14		835

(a)

Share option programmes

The Omnibus Equity Incentive Compensation Plan (“OEICP”) was established for grants after May 2015. Share options issued before May 2015 were issued in terms of the Rolling Stock Option Plan (“RSOP”), which was superseded by the OEICP. In accordance with ~~both plans,~~the OEICP, options are granted at an exercise price equal to the ~~market~~greater of volume weighted average trading price offor the ~~shares at~~five days prior to grant or the closing price on the day immediately prior to the date of ~~grant and~~ grant. The options vest according to dates set at the discretion of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors at the date of grant. All outstanding option awards that have been granted, pursuant to the plan, vest immediately.

Terms and conditions of share option programmes

The maximum term of the options under the OEICP is 10 years and under the RSOP 5 years. The terms and conditions relating to the grant of options under the RSOP are that all options are to be settled by physical delivery of shares. ~~Equity settled share based~~Equity-settled share-based payments under the OEICP will also be settled by physical delivery of shares. Under both plans the aggregate number of shares that may be issued pursuant to the grant of options, or under any other share compensation arrangements of the Company, will not exceed 10% of the aggregate issued and outstanding shares issued of the Company.

At December 31, ~~2016,~~2019, the Company has the following options outstanding:

Number of Options		Exercise Price		Expiry Date
		Canadian $
	5,000		4.00	Oct 8, 2020
	18,000		11.50	Oct 13, 2021
	5,000		8.10	May 30, 2022
	10,000		9.30	Aug 25, 2024
	38,000

F-59

Number of Options Exercise Price
Expiry Date⁽¹⁾
Canadian $
90,000 2.30 Oct 13, 2021
25,000 0.80 Oct 8, 2020
346,400 0.90 Sept 10, 2018
461,400

~~(1)~~

~~In terms of the approved Plan, the expiry date of options that expire in a closed period will be extended by 10 days from the cessation of the close period.~~

~~F-41~~

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31,

2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

21~~Share-based payments – (continued)~~

~~21.1Equity settled share-based payments – (continued)~~

27	Share-based expenses (continued)

27.2	Equity-settled share-based expense (continued)

(a)	Share option programmes (continued)

The continuity of the options granted, exercised, cancelled and expired under the Plan were as follows:

	Number of Options^*			Weighted Avg. Exercise Price
	Canadian $^*

Options outstanding and exercisable at January, 2017		92,280			5.85
Granted		5,000			8.10
Exercised		(69,280	)		4.50
Options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2017		28,000			9.55
Granted		10,000			9.30
Exercised		-			-
Options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2018		38,000			9.48
Granted		-			-
Exercised		-			-
Options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2019		38,000			9.48

Number of Options Weighted Avg. Exercise Price
Canadian $
Options outstanding and exercisable at January 1, 2014 2,847,920 1.11
Expired or forfeited (282,000 ) 1.13
Options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2014 2,565,920 1.11
Expired or forfeited (440,000 ) 1.11
Granted 115,000 0.73
Options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2015 2,240,920 1.08
Expired or forfeited (1,161,000 ) 1.30
Granted 90,000 2.30
Exercised (708,520 ) 0.83
Options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2016 461,400 1.17

The weighted average remaining contractual life of the outstanding options is ~~3.08~~2.14 years ~~(2015: 2.46~~(2018: 3.14 years).

F-60

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

27.2	Equity-settled share-based expense (continued)

(a)	Share option programmes (continued)

Inputs for measurement of grant date fair values

The fair value of share-based payments noted above was estimated using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model ~~with~~as the ~~following assumptions.~~fair value of the services could not be estimated reliably. Service and non-market performance conditions attached to the arrangements were not taken into account in measuring fair value.

2016 2015 2015
Options granted 90,000 25,000 90,000
Grant date October 13, 2016 October 7, 2015 December 21, 2015
Risk-free interest rate 0.53 % 0.53 % 0.53 %
Expected stock price volatility (based on historical volatility) 119 % 39,6 % 41,2 %
Expected option life in years 5 5 5
Exercise price CAD 2.30 CAD 0.80 CAD 0.74
Share price at grant date CAD 2.30 CAD 0.79 CAD 0.74
Fair value at grant date USD 1.89 USD 0.27 USD 0.27

~~During 2016 a share-based payment grant~~ The following assumptions were used in determining the fair value of ~~90,000 share equity options was made to Mr. J McGloin.~~ the options:

Options granted	10,000	* 5,000	*18,000
Grant date	February 27, 2018	May 30, 2018	October 13, 2017
Risk-free interest rate	2,86%	2.40%	0.53%
Expected stock price volatility (based on historical volatility)	32%	118%	119%
Expected option life in years	3	3	5
Exercise price	CAD 9.30	* CAD 8.10	* CAD 11.50
Share price at grant date	CAD 9.30	* CAD 8.10	* CAD 11.50
Fair value at grant date	$1.40	* $ 5.81	*$9.45

The exercise price iswas determined onas the prevailing Toronto Stock Exchange share price on the day of the grant. Expected volatility has been based on an evaluation of the historical volatility of the Company’s share price. The expected term has been based on historical experience. The share-based payment expense relating to the grants amounted to $Nil (2018: $14; 2017: $29).

* Amounts stated after the 1:5 share consolidation effected on June 26, 2017.

(b)	Facilitation and advance dividend loan modification

On June 23, 2017, the Group, Blanket Mine and the indigenous shareholders reached agreement to change the interest rate on the facilitation and advanced dividend loans from the previously agreed 12 month LIBOR + 10% to the lower of a fixed rate of 7.25% per annum, payable quarterly or 80% of the dividends paid in the financial quarter. The modification was beneficial to the indigenous shareholders and resulted in an equity-settled share-based payment expense of $806. The Monte Carlo simulation approach was followed to value the fair value of the indigenous shareholders’ equity before and after the modification date. The fair value of the indigenous shareholders’ equity was based on simulating the future Blanket Mine dividend yields.

The following assumptions were used in determining modification of the expense:

Modification date	June 23, 2017
Blanket Mine dividend yield	23.70%	-	89.88%
Risk free interest rate	$ swap curve
Group market capitalisation at grant date ($’000)	$68,436

F-61

~~F-42~~

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31,

2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

28	Loans and borrowings

	2019			2018			2017

Balance at January 1		5,960			1,486			2,987
Cash flows
Repayment
- Capital		-			(1,500	)		(1,500	)
- Interest		(130	)		(58	)		(156	)
Proceeds		2,340			6,000			-
Transaction cost		(46	)		(60	)		-
Unrealised foreign exchange		(5,818	)		-			-

Non-cash flows
Interest		165			92			155
Balance at December 31		2,471			5,960			1,486

Long-term portion of term loan facility		1,942			5,960			-
Short-term portion of term loan facility		529			-			1,486

21~~Share-based payments – (continued)~~

~~21.2Cash settled share-based payments~~

Certain key management members were granted Restricted Share Units (“RSU’s”) and Performance Share Units (“PSU’s”), pursuant to provisions of the 2015 Omnibus Equity Incentive Compensation Plan. All RSU’s and PSU’s were granted and approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.

~~The RSU’s will vest three years after grant date given that the service condition of the relevant employees~~

Finance costs are ~~fulfilled. The value of the vested RSU’s will be the number of RSU’s vested multiplied by the fair market value of the Company’s shares, as specified by the plan, on date of settlement.~~

The PSU’s have a service condition and a performance period of three years. The performance condition is a function of production cost, gold production and central shaft depth targets on certain specified dates. The number of PSU’s that will vest will be the PSU’s granted multiplied by the Performance Multiplier, which will reflect the actual performanceaccounted for in ~~terms of the performance conditions compared to expectations~~note 15 on the ~~date~~effective interest rate method.

Terms and repayment schedule

The terms and conditions of ~~the award.~~

~~RSU holders~~outstanding loans are entitled to receive dividends over the vesting period. Such dividends will be reinvested in additional RSU’s at the then applicable share price calculated at the average Bank of Canada noon rate immediately preceding the dividend payment. PSU’s have rights to dividends only after they have vested.

The fair value of the RSU’s, at the reporting date, were assumed to be the Toronto Stock Exchange (“TSX”) share price at reporting date. The fair value of the PSU’s, at the reporting date, were calculated as the TSX share price at reporting date less the fair value of the expected dividends during the vesting period multiplied by the performance multiplier expectation. At the reporting date it was assumed that there is a 100% probability that the performance conditions will be met and therefore a 100% performance multiplier was used in calculating the estimated liability.

~~The following assumptions were used in estimating the fair value of the cash settled share-based payment liability~~follows on December ~~31, 2016:~~31:

				2019				2018
	Currency	Nominal interest rate	Year of maturity	Face value		Carrying amount		Face value		Carrying amount

Unsecured bank loan - Stanbic	RTGS$	25%	2021		384		384		5,960		5,960
Unsecured bank loan - First Capital	RTGS$	26%	2021		2,087		2,087		-		-
Total					2,471		2,471		5,960		5,960

The Stanbic loan is repayable in as a single bullet payment in December of 2021 and the First Capital loan is repayable by way of 4 quarterly instalments commencing December 2020.

F-62

RSU’s PSU’s
Fair value (USD) $ 1.10 $ 1.05
Share price (USD) $ 1.10 $ 1.10
Performance multiplier percentage - 100 %
Dividend yield - 3.07 %
Share units granted up until reporting date:

RSU’s PSU’s
Grant - January 11, 2016 303,225 1,212,903
Grant – March 23, 2016 54,839 219,355
Grant – June 8, 2016 25,588 102,353
RSU dividend reinvestments 17,522 -
Total awards at December 31, 2016 401,174 1,534,611

~~F-43~~

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31,

2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

29	Trade and other payables

	2019		2018

Trade payables and accruals		2,825		2,510
Electricity accrual		626		4,054
Lease liability (note 13)		349		-
Audit fee		370		239
Shareholders for dividend		364		215
Other payables		582		475
Financial liabilities		5,116		7,493
Production and management bonus accrual - Blanket Mine		1,092		-
Other employee benefits		546		669
Leave pay		1,943		1,889
Non-financial liabilities		3,581		2,558
Total		8,697		10,051

22~~Loans and borrowings~~

2016 2015
Non-current portion of term loan facility 1,577 -
Current portion of term loan facility 1,410 -
2,987 -

On October 19, 2016 Blanket Mine received $3 million in terms of a term facility with Barclays Bank of Zimbabwe Limited bearing interest at an interest rate of 7.25% per annum and an upfront arrangement fee of $73. The term facility will be paid back over 8 quarterly instalments of $375 starting January 19, 2017. The term facility is secured in terms of a general notarial bond registered over the moveable assets of Blanket Mine to the value of $3,000. The agreement also incorporates an endorsement by the insurer of these movable assets. The endorsement provides Barclays Bank of Zimbabwe Limited with the cession of the insurance cover on the movable assets against all risk insured.

At the inception of the loan the liability was recognised at its fair value plus transaction cost. The imputed finance costs on the liability was determined at an incremental borrowing rate of 7.25%. Finance costs are accounted for in note 11 on the effective interest method. The fair value of the term facility approximates the carrying amount as the market rate approximated the actual rate at year end.

~~F-44~~

~~Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc~~

~~Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~For the years ended December 31~~

(~~in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise~~)

23 ~~Trade and other payables~~

2016 2015 2014

Trade payables 4,536 1,257 866
Audit fee 173 240 294
Other payables 343 1,599 507
Financial liabilities 5,052 3,096 1,667
VAT payable and other taxes 242 329 357
Production and management bonus accrual 1,156 1,792 -
Other employee benefits 123 114 102
Leave pay 1,504 1,325 1,134
Non-financial liabilities 3,025 3,560 1,593
Total 8,077 6,656 3,260

The Group’s exposure to currency and liquidity risk related to trade and other payables is disclosed in note 67 and note ~~25. Of~~31.

F-63

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the ~~production and management bonus accrual at~~Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, ~~2016, $1,156 (2015: $1,289) relates to production bonuses payable to the employees at Blanket.~~2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

24 ~~Cash flow information~~

30	Cash flow information

Non-cash items and information presented separately on the cash flow statement:

	2019			2018			2017

Operating profit		60,889			21,421			20,618
Adjustments for:
Loss on sale of Property, plant and equipment		-			-			2
Impairment of Property, plant and equipment		144			208			12
Profit on disposal of subsidiary		(5,409	)		-			-
Scrapping of Property, plant and equipment		63			-			-
Unrealised foreign exchange (gain)/loss		(31,307	)		(243	)		121
Cash-settled share-based payment expense		689			228			897
Cash-settled share-based payment expense included in operating cost		107			43			311
Equity-settled share-based payment expense		-			14			835
Settlement of cash-settled share-based payments		(1,384	)		-			-
Site restoration		-			30			36
Depreciation		4,434			4,071			3,763
Allowance for obsolete stock		-			15			32
Provision for impairment – royalty rebate (note 11)		-			-			181
Unrealised portion of gold hedge		(102	)		-			-
Net cash used for assets and liabilities held for sale		-			(2	)		-
Cash generated by operations before working capital changes		28,124			25,785			26,808
Inventories		(1,655	)		(277	)		(1,975	)
Prepayments		(2,099	)		(62	)		82
Trade and other receivables		393			(1,916	)		(1,437	)
Trade and other payables		(878	)		(2,411	)		5,407
Cash flows from operating activities		23,885			21,119			28,885

F-64

2016 2015 2014
Profit before tax 18,802 7,960 12,068
Adjustments for:
Net finance cost ^*
176 535
Loss on sale of Property, plant and equipment 44 - 62
Impairment of Property, plant and equipment 20 33 178
Foreign exchange gains on cash held (105 ) (2,865 ) (423 )
Site restoration 32 - 29
Share-based payment expense 788 24 -
Depreciation 3,491 3,322 3,540
Write off of inventory 862 46 -
Cash generated by operations before working capital changes 24,110 9,055 15,454
Inventories (1,990 ) 375 (94 )
Prepayments (99 ) (321 ) (46 )
Trade and other receivables 555 (1,472 ) 566
Trade and other payables 3,095 1,186 (296 )
Cash flows from operating activities

25,671

8,823

15,584

* Net interest excludes an amount of $103 of interest expenditure capitalised to Property, Plant and equipment (refer note 13). Of the interest capitalised an amount of $43 was paid and included in the interest paid amount on the Cash flow statement.

~~F-45~~

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31,

2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

25~~Financial instruments~~

i)~~Credit risk~~

31	Financial instruments

i)	Credit risk

Exposure to credit risk

The carrying amount of financial assets as disclosed in the statements of financial position and related notes represents the maximum credit exposure. The maximum exposure to credit risk for trade and other receivables at the reporting date by geographic region was:

Carrying amount	December 31, 2019		December 31, 2018

Zimbabwe		3, 123		3,639
Jersey, Channel Islands		2,003		-
Other regions		20		10
		5,146		3,649

Carrying amount 2016 2015

Canada - -
Zimbabwe 1,523 842
1,523 842

~~Impairment losses~~

None of the trade and other receivables are past due at year-end. Trade and other receivables have a past history of payment shortly after year end and management identified no factors at year end that could cause doubt about the credit quality or recoverability of the trade and other receivables.

~~ii)Liquidity risk~~

31	Financial instruments (continued)

ii)	Liquidity risk

The following are the contractual maturities of financial liabilities, including ~~estimated~~contractual interest payments and excluding the impact of netting agreements.

Non-derivative financial liabilities

December 31, 2019	Carrying amount		12 months or less		1-3 Years
Trade and other payables		5,116		5,116		-
Term loan facility		2,471		-		2,471
		7,587		5,116		2,471

December 31, 2018	Carrying amount		12 months or less		1-3 Years
Trade and other payables		7,493		7,493		-
Term loan facility		5,960		-		5,960
		13,453		7,493		5,960

Non-derivative financial liabilities Carrying amount 12 months or less 1-2 Years
December 31, 2016
Trade and other payables 5,052 5,052 -
Term loan facility 2,987 1,410 1,577
8,039 6,462 1,577
December 31, 2015 Carrying amount 12 months or less 1-2 Years
Trade and other payables 3,096 3,096 -
Bank overdraft 1,688 1,688 -
4,784 4,784 -

~~F-46~~

~~Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc~~

~~Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~For the years ended December 31~~

(~~in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise~~)

25~~Financial instruments (continued)~~

~~iii)Currency risk~~

iii)	Currency risk

The Group is exposed to currency risk to the extent that there is a mismatch between the currency that it transacts in and the functional currency. The results of the Group’s operations are subject to currency transaction risk and currency translation risk. The operating results and financial position of the Group are reported in US ~~dollar~~Dollar in the Group’s consolidated financial statements.

F-65

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

31	Financial instruments (continued)

iii)	Currency risk (continued)

The fluctuation of the US ~~dollar~~Dollar in relation to other currencies that entities within the Group may transact in will consequently have an ~~impact~~effect upon the profitability of the Group and may also ~~affect~~effect the value of the Group’s assets and liabilities. As noted below, the Group has certain financial assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of the Company. ~~The Group does not use any derivative instruments to reduce its foreign currency risks.~~To reduce exposure to currency transaction risk, the Group ~~predominantly maintains~~regularly reviews the currency in which it spends its cash to identify and avoid specific expenditures in currencies that experiences inflationary pressures. Further the Group aims to maintain cash and cash equivalents in US Dollar to avoid foreign exchange exposure and to meet ~~short~~‐~~term~~short-term liquidity requirements.

Sensitivity analysis

As a result of the Group’s monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies which is different to the functional currency of the underlying entities, the profit or loss and equity in the underlying entities could be affected by movements between the functional currency and the foreign currency. The table below indicates ~~net~~consolidated monetary assets/(liabilities) in the group that have a different functional currency and foreign currency. ~~Amounts are indicated before elimination of intergroup balances.~~

	2019 $‘000					2018 $‘000
	Functional currency					Functional currency
	ZAR		$			ZAR		$
Cash and cash equivalents		57		4,176			57		8,147
Trade and other receivables		-		1,735			-		126
Trade and other payables		-		(179	)		-		(345	)
Term loan		-		(2,471	)		-		(5,960	)
Overdraft		-		(490	)		-		-
		57		2,771			57		1,968

~~F-47~~

~~Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc~~

~~Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~For the years ended December 31~~

(~~in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise~~)

25~~Financial instruments (continued)~~

~~(iii)~~

~~Currency risk (continued)~~

A reasonably possible strengthening or weakening of 5% of the various functional currencies against the foreign currencies, would have the following equal or opposite effect on profit or loss ~~before tax~~and equity for the group:

	2019 $‘000					2018 $’000
	Functional currency					Functional currency
	ZAR		$			ZAR		$
Cash and cash equivalents		3		199			3		388
Trade and other receivables		-		82			-		6
Trade and other payables		-		9			-		(16	)
Term loan		-		(117	)		-		(283	)
Overdraft		-		(23	)		-		-
		3		150			3		95

F-66

* These intercompany balances represent

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the ~~exposure to foreign currency risk between functional currencies~~Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and ~~foreign currencies at a subsidiary level. These balances eliminate on consolidation.~~2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

~~(iv)~~31

Financial instruments (continued)

iv)	Interest rate risk

The group's interest rate risk arises from Loans and borrowings, overdraft facility and cash held. The Loans and borrowings, overdraft facility and cash held have variable interest rate borrowings. Variable rate borrowings expose the group to cash flow interest rate risk. The group has not entered into interest rate swap agreements.

The Group’s assets and liabilities exposed to interest rate fluctuations as at year end is ~~summarized~~summarised as follows:

	2019			2018
Cash and cash equivalents		9,383			11,187
Term loan		(2,471	)		(5,960	)
Overdraft		(490	)		-

2016 2015 2014
Term loan 2,987 - -
Cash and cash equivalents 14,335 12,568 23,082
Overdraft - (1,688 ) -

Interest rate risk arising is offset by available cash and cash equivalents. The table below summarises the effect of a change in finance cost on the Group’s ~~Total comprehensive income for the year,~~profit or loss and equity, had the rates charged differed.

Sensitivity analysis – Cash and cash equivalents	2019			2018
Increase by 100 basis points		94			111
Decrease by 100 basis points		(94	)		(111	)

Sensitivity analysis – Term loan	2019			2018

Increase by 100 basis points		(25	)		(60	)
Decrease by 100 basis points		25			60

~~Sensitivity analysis – Term loan and bank overdraft~~

Sensitivity analysis – Overdraft	2019			2018

Increase by 100 basis points		(5	)		-
Decrease by 100 basis points		5			-

2016 2015 2014

Increase in 100 basis points 30 17 3
Decrease in 100 basis points (30 ) (17 ) (3 )

~~F-48~~

~~Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc~~

~~Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~For the years ended December 31~~

(~~in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise~~)

25~~Financial instruments (continued)~~

~~(iv)~~32

~~Interest rate risk~~Dividends

	2019		2018		2017

Dividends paid to owners of the Company (Excluding NCI)		2,968		2,908		2,904

The quarterly dividend policy of paying 6,875 cents per share was increased to 7,5 cents from January 3, 2020.

Sensitivity analysis – Cash and cash equivalents

2016 2015 2014
Increase in 100 basis points 143 126 2
Decrease in 100 basis points (143) (126) (2)

~~(v)~~33

~~Gold price risk~~Contingencies

In February 2016, the Company entered into a derivative contract in respect of 15,000 ounces of gold over a period of 6 months and accordingly, the contract expired during the year. The contract protected the Company if the gold price fell below $1,050 per ounce but gave Caledonia full participation if the price of gold exceeded $1,079 per ounce. The derivative contract was entered into by the Company for economic hedging purposes and not as a speculative investment.

The derivative contract resulted in a loss of $435 that was included in profit or loss. The Company settled the contract with the $435 margin call deposited at the inception of the hedge transaction. Blanket continued to sell all of its gold production to Fidelity Printers and Refiners Ltd (“Fidelity”), as required by Zimbabwean legislation, and received the spot price of gold less an early settlement discount of 1.25%. As at December 31, 2016 no financial instruments were in place to manage the gold price risk. A 5% increase or decrease in the average realised gold price would have increased or decreased Revenue by $3,100 (2015: $2,449).

26~~Dividends~~

2016 2015 2014

Dividends paid to owners of the company (Excluding NCI) 2,639 2,504 2,850

From January 7, 2014 to October 6, 2015, the Company paid an annual aggregate dividend of six Canadian cents CAD 0.060 per share in quarterly instalments of CAD 0.015 per share. On January 5, 2016 the Company announced that it revised its dividend policy to $0.045 per share per annum, paid in quarterly instalments of $0.01125. On July 5, 2016 the Company announced a 22 percent increase in the quarterly dividend to $ 0.01375 and $ 0.055 per annum. ~~The increased dividend represents Caledonia’s revised dividend policy.~~

~~F-49~~

~~Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc~~

~~Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~For the years ended December 31~~

(~~in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise~~)

27~~Contingencies~~

The Group may be subject to various claims that arise in the normal course of business. Management believes there are no contingent ~~liabilities~~liabilities.

F-67

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of ~~the Group arising from claims.~~United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

28~~Related parties~~

34	Related parties

Key management personnel are those persons having authority and responsibility for planning, directing and controlling the activities of the entity. Directors of the company, as well as certain ~~mine managers~~executives are considered key management.

Employee contracts between Caledonia Mining South Africa Proprietary Limited, the Company and key management, include an option for respective key management to terminate such employee contract in the event of a change in control of the Company and to receive a severance payment equal to two years’ compensation. If this was triggered as at December 31, ~~2016~~2019 the severance payment would have amounted to ~~$4,646 (2015: $3,578; 2014: $3,611)~~$4,051 (2018: $5,221). A change in control would constitute:

the acquisition of more than 50% of the shares; or

the acquisition of right to exercise the majority of the voting rights of shares; or

the acquisition of the right to appoint the majority of the board of directors; or

the acquisition of more than 50% of the assets of the Group.

Key management personnel and director transactions:

A number of related parties transacted with the Group in the reporting period. The aggregate value of transactions and outstanding balances relating to key management personnel and entities over which they have control or significant influence were as follows:

	2019		2018		2017
Key management salaries and bonuses		2,362		2,476		2,041
Cash-settled share-based expense^*		723		261		1,164
		3,085		2,737		3,205

2016 2015 2014
Key management salaries and bonuses 2,033 2,452 1,781
Share-based payments 788 24 -
2,821 2,476 1,781

Employees, officers, directors, consultants and other service providers also participate in the Group's share option program (see note ~~21)~~27.1(a)). Group entities are set out in note ~~29.~~

35.

Refer to note 56 and note 3137 for transactions with Non-controlling interests. Refer to note 3036 for management fees between Caledonia Mining South Africa Proprietary Limited and Blanket Mine (1983) (Private) Limited.

^*Amount inclusive of $107 (2018: $43) classified as production costs.

F-68

~~F-50~~

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31,

2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

35	Group entities

	Functional currency	Country of incorporation	Legal shareholding		Intercompany balances with holding company
			2019	2018	2019			2018
Subsidiaries of the Company			%	%
Caledonia Holdings Zimbabwe (Private) Limited	$	Zimbabwe	100	100	-			-
Caledonia Mining Services Limited	$	Zimbabwe	100	100		-			-
Fintona Investments Proprietary Limited	ZAR	South Africa	100	100		(14,859	)		(14,859	)
Caledonia Mining South Africa Proprietary Limited	ZAR	South Africa	100	100		1,750			(565	)
Greenstone Management Services Holdings Limited	$	United Kingdom	100	100		14,902			9,813
Blanket Mine (1983) (Private) Limited	$	Zimbabwe	⁽²⁾49	⁽²⁾49		(400	)		-
Blanket Employee Trust Services (Private) Limited (BETS) ⁽¹⁾	$	Zimbabwe	-	-		-			-

29~~Group entities~~

Functional currency Country of incorporation Legal shareholding Intercompany balances with Holding company
2016 2015 2014 2016 2015 2014
Subsidiaries of the Company % % %
Caledonia Holdings Zimbabwe (Private) Limited USD Zimbabwe 100 100 100 - - -
Caledonia Mining (Zambia) Limited⁽⁵⁾
ZMW Zambia - - 100 - - (15,499)
Caledonia Nama Limited⁽⁵⁾
ZMW Zambia - - 100 - - (12,435)
Caledonia Mining Services Limited USD Zimbabwe 100 100 100 - - -
Eersteling Gold Mining Company Limited ZAR South Africa 100 100 100 (12,793) (12,585) (12,575)
Fintona Investments Proprietary Limited ZAR South Africa 100 100 100 (14,859) (14,859) (14,859)
Caledonia Mining South Africa Proprietary Limited ZAR South Africa 100 100 100 (87) (3,806) (3,806)
Greenstone Management Services Holdings Limited ⁽⁴⁾
USD United Kingdom 100 100 100 13,527 7,846 7,846
Maid O’ Mist Proprietary Limited ZAR South Africa 100 100 100 - - -
Mapochs Exploration Proprietary Limited ZAR South Africa 100 100 100 - - -
Caledonia Holdings (Africa) Limited USD Barbados 100 100 100 - - -
Blanket (Barbados) Holdings Limited USD Barbados 100 100 100 - - -
Blanket Mine (1983) (Private) Limited⁽³⁾
USD Zimbabwe
⁽²⁾49
49 49 - - -
Blanket Employee Trust Services (Private) Limited (BETS)⁽¹⁾

USD Zimbabwe - - - - - -

⁽

¹⁾⁽¹⁾BETS and the ~~Employee~~Community Trust are consolidated as structured entities.

⁽²⁾Refer to ~~Note 5,~~note 6, for the effective shareholding. NCI has a 16.2% interest in cash flows of Blanket only.

F-69

⁽³⁾~~Blanket has no subsidiary companies~~

⁽⁴⁾~~On November 18, 2016, the entity’s name changed from Greenstone Management Services Limited to Greenstone Management Services Holdings Limited.~~

⁽⁵⁾~~The Zambia operations were closed down during 2015 and the Companies in Zambia were struck of the Companies register on September 2, 2015.~~

~~F-51~~

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31,

2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

30~~Operating Segments~~

36	Operating Segments

The Group's operating segments have been identified based on geographic areas.

~~During 2016 the Group had three reportable segments as described below, which represents the Group's strategic business units.~~ The strategic business units are managed separately because they require different technology and marketing strategies. For each of the strategic business units, the Group’s CEO reviews internal management reports on at least a quarterly basis. ~~The following geographical areas~~Zimbabwe and South Africa describe the operations of the Group's reportable segments: Head office, Zimbabwe and South Africa. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as described in note 4. The Corporate segment comprise the holding company and Greenstone Management Services Holdings Limited (UK) responsible for administrative functions within the group.segments. The Zimbabwe operating ~~segments~~segment comprise Caledonia Holdings Zimbabwe Limited and subsidiaries. The South Africa geographical segment comprise a gold mine in 2018, sold in 2019, that iswas on care and maintenance, as well as sales made by Caledonia Mining South Africa Proprietary Limited to the Blanket Mine. The ~~Zambia segment, relevant to~~holding company and Greenstone Management Services Holdings Limited (UK) responsible for administrative functions within the ~~comparative year, consisted~~group are taken into consideration in the strategic decision-making process of ~~Nama copper project~~the CEO and ~~cobalt project~~are therefore included in the disclosure below. Corporate and ~~was deregistered on September 2, 2015.~~other reconciling amounts do not represent a separate segment. Information regarding the results of each reportable segment is included below. Performance is measured based on segment profit before income tax, as included in the internal management ~~reports~~report that are reviewed by the Group's CEO. Segment profit is used to measure performance as management believes that such information is the most relevant in evaluating the results of certain segments relative to other entities that operate within these industries.

Information about reportable segments 2019	Zimbabwe			South Africa			Inter-group elimination adjustments			Corporate and other reconciling amounts			Total


Revenue		75,826			15,973			(15,194	)		(779	)		75,826
Royalties		(3,854	)		-			-			-			(3,854	)
Production costs		(36,278	)		(13,740	)		13,618			-			(36,400	)
Depreciation		(4,645	)		(90	)		350			(49	)		(4,434	)
Management fee*		(2,798	)		2,798			-			-			-
Other income		2,016			258			-			-			2,274
Other expenses		(498	)		(168	)		-			-			(666	)
Administrative expenses		(126	)		(1,736	)		-			(3,775	)		(5,637	)
Cash-settled share-based expense		(234	)		(166	)		-			(289	)		(689	)
Net Foreign exchange gain		29,634			9			-			18			29,661
Net finance cost		(299	)		57			-			44			(198	)
Profit on sale of subsidiary		-			-			-			5,409			5,409
Gold hedge expense		-			-			-			(601	)		(601	)
Profit before tax		58,744			3,195			(1,226	)		(22	)		60,691
Tax expense		(9,529	)		(825	)		192			(128	)		(10,290	)
Profit for the year		49,215			2,370			(1,034	)		(150	)		50,401

Information about reportable segments 2016
^*Head office
Zimbabwe South Africa Inter-group eliminations adjustments Total

Revenue - 61,992 11,348 (11,348 ) 61,992
Royalties - (2,923 ) - - (2,923 )
Production costs - (33,081 ) (10,185 ) 11,180 (32,086 )
Depreciation - (3,733 ) (47 ) 289 (3,491 )
Management fee^**
- (3,960 ) 3,960 - -
Other income 120 1,194 16 - 1,330
Other expenses - (55 ) - - (55 )
Administrative expenses (4,690 ) (128 ) (3,119 ) 674 (7,263 )
Share-based payment expenses (340 ) (342 ) (106 ) - (788 )
Net Foreign exchange gain 22 2 (529 ) - (505 )
Margin call on hedge (435 ) - - - (435 )
Net finance cost - (191 ) 15 - (176 )
Sale of Blanket Mine treasury bills - 3,202 - - 3,202
Profit before tax (5,323 ) 21,977 1,353 795 18,802
Tax expense - (6,795 ) (922 ) - (7,717 )
Profit for the year* (5,323 ) 15,182 431 795 11,085

* Head office reconciles to group accounts.

Of the management fee ~~$641~~$627 was receivable and payable at year end ~~(2015: $280)~~(2018: $1,871).

F-70

~~F-52~~

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31,

2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

36	Operating Segments (continued)

Information about reportable segments 2019	Zimbabwe			South Africa			Inter-group elimination adjustments			Corporate and other reconciling amounts			Total

Geographic segment assets:
Current (excluding intercompany)		21,608			3,383			(139	)		4,987			29,839
Non-current (excluding intercompany)		115,611			315			(2,456	)		244			113,714
Expenditure on property, plant and equipment		21,465			47			(1,165	)		248			20,595
Intercompany balances		-			8,869			(52,783	)		43,914			-

Geographic segment liabilities
Current (excluding intercompany)		(7,177	)		(1,546	)		-			(627	)		(9,350	)
Non-current (excluding intercompany)		(9,085	)		(17	)		140			(524	)		(9,486	)
Intercompany balances		(2,441	)		(32,558	)		52,783			(17,784	)		-

Information about reportable segments 2018	Zimbabwe			South Africa			Inter-group elimination adjustments			Corporate and other reconciling amounts			Total


Revenue		68,399			12,554			(12,166	)		(388	)		68,399
Royalties		(3,426	)		-			-			-			(3,426	)
Production costs		(39,186	)		(11,328	)		11,199			-			(39,315	)
Depreciation		(4,366	)		(32	)		327			-			(4,071	)
Management fee^*		(2,650	)		2,650			-			-			-
Other income		6,482			366			-			253			7,101
Other expenses		(296	)		-			-			(40	)		(336	)
Administrative expenses		(159	)		(2,433	)		-			(3,873	)		(6,465	)
Cash-settled share-based expense		(84	)		(137	)		-			(94	)		(315	)
Equity-settled share-based expense		-			-			-			(14	)		(14	)
Net Foreign exchange gain/(loss)		133			(327	)		-			417			223
Net finance cost		(262	)		17			-			25			(220	)
Gold hedge expense		-			-			-			(360	)		(360	)
Profit before tax		24,585			1,330			(640	)		(4,074	)		21,201
Tax expense		(7,085	)		(387	)		153			(126	)		(7,445	)
Profit for the year		17,500			943			(487	)		(4,200	)		13,756

F-71

30~~Operating Segments – (continued)~~

2016 Head office Zimbabwe South Africa Inter-group elimination adjustments Total

Geographic segment assets:
Current (excluding intercompany) 5,050 19,501 1,616 (375 ) 25,792
Non-current (excluding intercompany) 40 65,824 388 (1,335 ) 64,917
Additions to property, plant and equipment - 19,000 36 123 19,159
Intercompany balances 42,871 - 7,080 (49,951 ) -

Geographic segment liabilities
Current (excluding intercompany) (313 ) (8,801 ) (718 ) - (9,832 )
Non-current (excluding intercompany) - (20,989 ) (517 ) - (21,560 )
Intercompany balances (14,900 ) (2,184 ) (32,867 ) 49,951 -

Information about reportable segments 2015
Head office Zimbabwe South Africa Zambia

Inter-group
eliminations
adjustments
Total

Revenue 9,497 48,978 17,016 - (26,514) 48,977
Royalties - (2,455) - - - (2,455)
Production costs - (30,955) (12,174) - 13,110 (30,019)
Depreciation - (3,559) (42) - 279 (3,322)
Other income 9 55 46 - - 110
Management fee - (4,140) 4,140 - - -
Administrative expenses (5,802) (118) (8,135) (750) 7,183 (7,622)
Share-based payment expense (24) - - - - (24)
Net foreign exchange gain 431 - 2,419 - - 2,850
Finance income - - 1 - - 1
Finance expense (344) (190) (2) - - (536)
Profit before income tax 3,767 7,616 3,269 (750) (5,942) 7,960
Tax expense 522 (2,616) (276) - - (2,370)
Profit after income tax 4,289 5,000 2,993 (750) (5,942) 5,590

~~F-53~~

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31,

2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

36	Operating Segments (continued)

Information about reportable segments 2018	Zimbabwe			South Africa			Inter-group elimination adjustments			Corporate and other reconciling amounts			Total

Geographic segment assets:
Current (excluding intercompany)		21,505			3,489			(91	)		3,265			28,168
Non-current (excluding intercompany)		98,700			466			(1,641	)		-			97,525
Expenditure on property, plant and equipment		20,436			370			(891	)		-			19,915
Intercompany balances		-			6,926			(46,240	)		39,314			-
Assets held for sale		-			296			-			-			296

Geographic segment liabilities
Current (excluding intercompany)		(10,445	)		(1,403	)		-			(350	)		(12,198	)
Non-current (excluding intercompany)		(33,043	)		(47	)		446			(2,043	)		(34,687	)
Intercompany balances		(1,345	)		(33,032	)		46,240			(11,863	)		-
Liabilities directly associated with assets held for sale					(609	)		-			-			(609	)

Information about reportable segments 2017	Zimbabwe			South Africa			Inter-group eliminations adjustments			Corporate and other reconciling amounts			Total

Revenue		69,762			-			-			-			69,762
Inter-segmental revenue		-			15,247			(15,061	)		(186	)		-
Royalties		(3,498	)		-			-			-			(3,498	)
Production costs		(36,753	)		(14,751	)		15,324			-			(36,180	)
Depreciation		(4,019	)		(53	)		309			-			(3,763	)
Management fee		(3,960	)		3,960			-			-			-
Other income		2,358			205			-			31			2,594
Other expenses		-			(14	)		-			-			(14	)
Impairment loss on trade receivables		(181	)		-			-			-			(181	)
Administrative expenses		(40	)		(2,258	)		-			(3,613	)		(5,911	)
Cash-settled share-based expense		(581	)		-			-			(395	)		(976	)
Equity-settled share-based expense		(806	)		-			-			(29	)		(835	)
Net foreign exchange (loss)/gain		(375	)		207			-			(212	)		(380	)
Net finance cost		(69	)		10			-			28			(31	)
Profit before tax		21,838			2,553			572			(4,376	)		20,587
Tax expense		(7,587	)		(1,104	)		-			-			(8,691	)
Profit for the year		14,251			1,449			572			(4,376	)		11,896

F-72

30~~Operating Segments – (continued)~~

2015
Head office Zimbabwe South Africa Zambia Inter-group eliminations adjustments Total
Geographic segment assets:
Current 8,857 10,386 4,918 1 (600 ) 23,562
Non-current (excluding intercompany) 40 50,613 370 - (1,747 ) 49,276
Additions to property, plant and equipment - 18,385 143 - (335 ) 18,193
Intercompany balances 74,007 1,509 7,958 - (83,474 ) -

Geographic segment liabilities

Current

(433
)

(6,497
)

(1,469
)

-

-

(8,397
)
Non-current (excluding intercompany) - (13,621 ) (459 ) - - (14,080 )
Intercompany balances (16,734 ) (3,507 ) (37,290 ) (25,943 ) 83,474 -

Information about reportable segments 2014
Head office Zimbabwe South Africa Zambia
Inter-group eliminations adjustments
Total

Revenue 3,719 53,513 7,167 - (10,886 ) 53,513
Royalties - (3,522 ) - - - (3,522 )
Production costs - (28,836 ) (6,256 ) - 6,884 (27,908 )
Depreciation - (3,522 ) (18 ) - - (3,540 )
Other income - 16 9 - - 25
Management fee - (4,680 ) 4,680 - - -
Administrative expenses (3,115 ) (436 ) (2,942 ) (894 ) - (7,387 )
Impairment - (81 ) - (97 ) - (178 )
Net foreign exchange gain 49 - 1,016 - - 1,065
Finance income 14 - - - - 14
Finance expense - (154 ) - - - (154 )
Profit before income tax 667 12,598 3,656 (991 ) (4,002 ) 11,928
Tax expense (1,067 ) (3,594 ) (1,321 ) - - (5,982 )
Profit after income tax (400 ) 9,004 2,335 (991 ) (4,002 ) 5,946

~~F-54~~

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31,

2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

30~~Operating Segments – (continued)~~

2014
Head office Zimbabwe South Africa Zambia Inter-group eliminations adjustments Total
Geographic segment assets:

Current 10,768 10,448 11,782 44 (1,300 ) 31,743
Non-current (excluding intercompany) 48 35,818 306 - (1,436 ) 34,736
Additions to property, plant and equipment - 7,022 47 97 - 7,166
Intercompany balances 101,920 1,503 29,060 - (132,483 ) -

Geographic segment liabilities
Current

(994
)

(2,412
)

(1,566
)

-

-

(4,972
)
Non-current (excluding intercompany) - (10,571 ) (593 ) - - (11,164 )
Intercompany balances (33,955 ) (902 ) (72,406 ) (25,220 ) 132,438 -

36	Operating Segments (continued)

Major customer

Revenues from Fidelity ~~Printers~~ in Zimbabwe amounted to ~~approximately 61,992 (2015: 48,977; 2014: $53,513)~~$75,826 (2018: $68,399; 2017: $69,762).

37	Non-controlling interests

Blanket Mine (1983) (Private) Limited NCI % - 16.2%

	2019			2018			2017

Current assets		21,386			19,107			15,559
Non-current assets		115,610			98,700			82,798
Current liabilities		(8,630	)		(13,200	)		(16,232	)
Non-current liabilities		(9,085	)		(33,043	)		(23,041	)
Net assets		119,281			71,564			59,084

Carrying amount of NCI		16,302			8,345			5,944


Revenue		75,826			68,399			69,762
Profit after tax		51,746			18,456			15,506
Total comprehensive income		51,746			18,456			15,506

Profit allocated to NCI		8,383			2,990			2,512
Dividend to NCI		(426	)		(589	)		(406	)

F-73

~~F-55~~

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31,

2019, 2018 and 2017

(in thousands of United States dollars, unless indicated otherwise)

3138	~~Non-controlling interests~~Defined Contribution Plan

Blanket Mine (1983) (Private) Limited NCI % - 16.2%
2016 2015 2014

Current assets 13,151 10,386 10,448
Non-current assets 65,823 50,613 37,322
Current liabilities (8,698 ) (6,497 ) (2,412 )
Non-current liabilities (20,185 ) (13,621 ) (10,571 )
Net assets 50,091 40,881 (34,787 )

Carrying amount of NCI 3,708 1,504 693

Revenue 61,992 48,977 53,515
Profit 15,800 5,000 8,860
Total comprehensive income 15,800 5,000 8,860

Profit allocated to NCI 2,559 811 1,511
Dividend paid to NCI (355 ) - 770

32~~Defined Contribution Plan~~

Under the terms of the Mining Industry Pension Fund (“Fund”) in Zimbabwe, eligible employees contribute a fixed percentage of their eligible earnings to the Fund. Blanket Mine makes a matching contribution plus an inflation levy as a fixed percentage of eligible earnings of these employees. The total contribution by Blanket Mine for the year ended December 31, ~~2016~~2019 was ~~$567 (2015: $473; 2014: $443)~~$506 (2018: $619).

39	Subsequent events

There were no significant subsequent events between December 31, 2019 and the date of issue of these financial statements other than described below and included in the preceding notes to the consolidated financial statements.

(a)

Purchase of 15% Fremiro stake in Blanket

On January 21, 2020 the Group concluded the purchase of Fremiro’s 15% shareholding in Blanket Mine and its facilitation loans. The purchase price of $16,667 was settled through the issue of 727,266 shares in the Company and cancelled the facilitation loan outstanding, repurchased the NCI and increased the Group’s shareholding in Blanket Mine.

At the date of authorisation of the financial statements the estimated financial effect could not be made.

(b)

Amendment of GCSOT advanced dividend loan terms

On February 27, 2020 the Blanket board approved the amendment to the terms of the GCSOT advanced dividend loan (refer note 6). It was resolved that going forward, 20% of the Blanket dividend attributable to GCSOT would accrue to GCSOT unconditionally and 80% would repay the advanced dividend loan. At the date of authorisation of the financial statements the estimated financial effect could not be made.

(c)

Going concern assumption and COVID-19

Management prepared these consolidated financial statements on a going concern basis as it is not intended to liquidate the business or cease trading in the foreseeable future.

Due to the worldwide COVID-19 outbreak, material uncertainties may come into existence that could influence management’s going concern assumption. Management cannot accurately predict the future impact COVID-19 may have on:

global gold prices;

demand for gold and the ability to refine and sell gold produced;

the severity and the length of potential measures taken by governments to manage the spread of the disease, and their effect on labour availability and supply lines;

availability of government supplies, such as water and electricity;

local currency purchasing power; or

ability to obtain funding.

At the date of the approval of these consolidated financial statements, the Zimbabwean government has not introduced measures which impede the normal operation of the business. The South African government has introduced measures which effectively shut down the normal supply chain for the business for a period of 21 days from March 26, 2020. Management believes the business holds sufficient levels of stocks to be able to maintain normal production without interruption and accordingly the current situation bears no impact on management’s going concern assumption.

F-74

~~F-56~~

SIGNATURE

The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this Annual Report on its behalf.

Date March 30, ~~2017~~

2020

	CALEDONIA MINING CORPORATION PLC
	By:	/s/ Mark Learmonth

~~By:~~	~~/s/~~ Mark Learmonth
	~~Mark Learmonth~~ Chief Financial Officer

~~F-57~~

Title of Class	Trading Symbol(s)	Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
Common Shares, no par value	CMCL	NYSE American LLC

Large accelerated filer [ ]	Accelerated filer [ ]	Non-accelerated filer [X]

		Emerging growth company [X]

	2016	2015	2014	2013	2012
Market Capitalization (Thousands) at December 31 ⁽³⁾	60,178	32,209	31,791	39,088	46,301
Shares Outstanding (Thousands)⁽¹⁾	52,787	52,078	52,117	52,117	51,446
Options Outstanding (Thousands)⁽¹⁾	461	2,241	2,565	2,848	3,330

PART I	9
ITEM 1 - ~~IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS~~Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers	89
ITEM 2 - OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE	89
ITEM 3 - KEY INFORMATION	89
A.	Selected Financial Data	89
B.	Capitalization and Indebtedness	910
C.	Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds	910
D.	Risk Factors	910
ITEM 4 - INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY	1823
A.	History and Development of the Company	1823
B.	Business Overview	2025
C.	Organizational Structure	2627
D.	Property, Plant and Equipment	2728
ITEM 4A - UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS	2734
ITEM 5- OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS	2734
A.	~~Operational~~ Operating Results	2735
B.	Liquidity and Capital Resources	3241
C.	Research and development, patents and ~~licences~~licenses, etc	3442
D.	Trend Information	3442
E.	Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements	3443
F.	Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations	3443
ITEM 6 - DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES	3444
A.	Directors and Senior Management	3444
B.	Compensation	3948
C.	Board Practices	4049
D.	Employees	4050
E.	Share Ownership	4150
ITEM 7 - MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS	4251
A.	Major Shareholders	4251
B.	Related Party Transactions	4252
C.	Interests of Experts and Counsel	4352
ITEM 8 - FINANCIAL INFORMATION	4352
A.	Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information	4352
B.	Significant Changes	4452
ITEM 9 - THE OFFERING AND LISTING	4453
A.	Offering and Listing Details	4453
B. Plan of Distribution	53
C. Markets	53
D. Selling Shareholders	53
E. Dilution	53
F. Expenses of the Issue	53
ITEM 10 - ADDITIONAL INFORMATION	4753
A.	Share Capital	4753
B.	Articles of Association	4753
C.	Material Contracts	4859
D.	Exchange Controls	4860
E.	Taxation	4860
F.	Dividends and Paying Agents	5264
G.	Statement by Experts	5264
H.	Documents on Display	5264
I.	Subsidiary Information	5365

Financial – All in USD’000’s unless indicated otherwise	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
Revenue	75,826	68,399	69,762	61,992	48,977
Gross Profit	31,138	21,587	26,321	23,492	13,181
Net Income – after tax from operations	50,401	13,756	11,896	11,085	5,590
Net Income – after tax from continuing operations	50,401	13,756	11,896	11,085	5,590
Profit attributable to owners of the Company	42,018	10,766	9,384	8,526	4,779
Net cash and cash equivalent	8,893	11,187	12,756	14,335	10,880
Current Assets	29,839	28,168	27,913	25,792	23,562
Total Assets	143,553	125,693	110,056	90,709	72,838
Current Liabilities	9,350	12,198	15,602	9,832	8,397
Non-current Liabilities	9,486	34,687	25,243	21,560	14,080
Net Assets/Total equity	124,717	78,808	69,211	59,317	50,361
Total Capital Expenditures – Cash	20,024	20,192	21,639	19,885	16,567
Dividend per share – cents ⁽¹⁾	27.5	27.4	27.4	24.5	24
Earnings per share – cents ⁽¹⁾	382	99	86.5	79.5	44.5
Diluted earnings per share – cents ⁽¹⁾	381	99	86.4	79	44.5

Mineral Resource Category	Tonnes (metric)		Grade (Au g/t)		Gold Content (ounces)
Measured Resources		1,572,733		3.91		197,606
Indicated Resources		2,478,902		3.77		300,288
Total Measured and Indicated		4,051,635		3.82		497,895
Inferred Resources*		3,344,831		5.11		549,963

Mineral Reserve Category	Tonnes (metric)		Grade (Au g/t)		Gold Content (ounces)
Proven Reserves		856,005		3.40		93,638
Probable Reserves		2,077,828		3.78		252,758
Total Proven & Probable Reserves		2,933,833		3.67		346,396

Mineral Reserve Category	Tonnnes (metric)		Grade (Au g/t)		Gold Content (ounces)
Proven Reserves		798,900		3.70		95,000
Probable Reserves		2,061,000		3.64		241,300
Total Proven & Probable Reserves		2,859,900		3.66		336,300

Payments to the Community and the Zimbabwe Government (US$’000’s)
	Community and Social Investment	Payments to the Community Trust	Payments to Zimbabwe Government	Total
Year 2014	35	-	12,319	12,354
Year 2015	58	-	7,376	7,434
Year 2016	12	-	10,637	10,649


($’000’s unless otherwise indicated)	12 Months to December 31
	2014			2015			2016
Production cost (IFRS)		27,908			30,019			32,086
Less site restoration costs		(29	)		-			(32	)
Less exploration cost		(343	)		(380	)		(408	)
Less safety costs		(473	)		(551	)		(221	)
Other cost		906			1,011			535
On-mine production cost		27,979			30,099			31,960

Gold sales (oz.)		42,927			42,943			50,269
On-mine cost per ounce ($/oz.)		652			701			636

Royalty		3,521			2,455			2,923
Export incentive		-			-			(1,104	)
Exploration, remediation and permitting cost		305			399			311
Sustaining capital development		2,348			4,707			3,792
Administrative expenses		7,387			7,622			7,263
Less Zambian expenses		(896	)		(716	)		(17	)
Silver by-product credit		(61	)		(48	)		(62	)
Share-based payment expense		-			24			788
Other		54			(2	)
All in sustaining cost		40,637			44,540			45,854

Gold sales (oz.)		42,927			42,943			50,269
All in sustaining cost per ounce ($/oz.)		947			1,037			912

Permitting and exploration expenses		161			138			182
Non-sustaining capital expenses		3,833			13,486			15,367
Total all in cost		44,631			58,164			61,402

Gold sales (oz.)		42,927			42,943			50,269
All in cost per ounce ($/oz.)		1,040			1,354			1,221

$’000	Payments due by Period
	Within 1 Year	1-3 years	3-5 years	More than 5 years	Total
Trade and other payables	8,077	-	-	-	8,077
Term loan facility	1,410	1,577	-	-	2,987
Provisions	-	-	-	3,456	3,456
Capital expenditure commitments	2,122	-	-	-	2,122

Name, Office Held and Municipality of Residence	Principal Occupations During Past Five Years	Positions held Since	Number of Shares Beneficially Owned, Controlled or Directed as of March 30, 2017
James Johnstone Director Gibsons, British Columbia, Canada	Retired. Formerly Chief Operating Officer of the Company and Director of several of its subsidiary companies.	1997	40,000
Steven Curtis Chief Executive Officer & Director Johannesburg, South Africa	Previous VP Finance, Chief Financial Officer from March 2016 and Director of the Company and Director of certain of its subsidiary companies.	Director since 2008 Chief Executive Officer since 2014	420,000
Leigh Wilson Director Stuart, Florida, USA	Chairman of the Victory Portfolios Winston Maritime LLC FundVantage Trust Stella and Hack Wilson Family Foundation	2012	215,000
John Kelly Director New Canaan, Connecticut	Partner at Endgate Commodities LLC, Member of CrossRoad LLC, Director of Liquidnet Europe Ltd, Officer of Liquidnet Holdings, Inc.	2012	57,465
Johan Holtzhausen Director, Cape Town, South Africa	Business consultant and Independent Director of DRDGOLD Limited.	2013	90,000
Dana Roets Chief Operating Officer Johannesburg, South Africa	VP and Head of Operations at Kloof Gold Mine. More recently, Dana was the COO at Great Basin Gold which had gold mining operations in the United States of America and South Africa.	2013	Nil
Mark Learmonth Chief Financial Officer & Director Jersey, Channel Islands	Vice-President of the Company focused on financial reporting, investor and shareholder relations and corporate development. Former Vice-President Business Development, of the Company	Chief Financial Officer since 2014 and Director since 2015 Vice-President, Business Development since 2008	324,750
John McGloin Director Bishops Stortford, United Kingdom	Previous Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Amara Mining Plc. Current non-executive director of Perseus Mining Limited	2016	Nil
Maurice Mason VP Corporate Development and Investor Relations London, England	Previous Director at Equity Research, for Stifel Nicolaus Europe Ltd	2016	35,000
Adam Chester General Counsel, Company Secretary and Head of Risk and Compliance Jersey, Channel Islands	Solicitor of the Supreme Court of England and Wales. Partner at Walkers and advocate of the Royal Court of Jersey.	2017	Nil

Name and principal position	Year	Salary	Long term incentive plan ⁽²⁾	Annual incentive plans	All other compensation	Total compensation
(a)	(b)	(c)	(d)	(e)	(h)	(i)
Steven Curtis ChiefExecutive Officer	2016 2015 2014	428,637 428,637 410,085	214,282 - -	- - 60,012	42,867 ⁽¹⁾180,255 40,758	685,786 608,892 510,855
Dana Roets Chief Operating Officer	2016 2015 2014	418,182 418,182 400,083	140,107 - -	- - 60,012	41,818 ⁽¹⁾138,000 -	600,107 556,182 460,095
Mark Learmonth Chief Financial Officer	2016 2015 2014	410,000 360,000 275,057	122,410 - -	- - 60,012	41,000 ⁽¹⁾154,000 -	573,410 514,000 335,069
Caxton Mangezi General Manager and Director of the Blanket Mine	2016 2015 2014	348,400 348,400 335,069	115,383 - -	- - 27,922	205,226 ⁽¹⁾190,002 10,002	669,009 538,402 372,993
Maurice Mason VP Corporate Development and Investor Relations	2016 2015 2014	96,735 - -	25,610 - -	- - -	- - -	122,345 - -

Key management member	Vesting date	RSU’s	PSU’s
Steve Curtis	January 11, 2019	132,146	503,226
Dana Roets	January 11, 2019	86,403	329,032
Mark Learmonth	January 11, 2019	28,801	109,677
Mark Learmonth	March 23, 2019	56,565	219,355
Caxton Mangezi	January 11,2019	71,156	270,968
Maurice Mason	August 6, 2019	26,103	102,353
Total		401,174	1,534,611

Management and Administration:
Employee Locations:	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
London, United Kingdom	-	-	-	-	1
Jersey, Channel Islands	-	-	-	-	2
Zimbabwe	32	32	36	37	42
South Africa (African Office)	7	12	12	12	13
South Africa (Exploration and Operations)	2	1	1	1	1
Zambia (Head Office and Security)	4	4	4	-	-
Total Management and Administration	45	49	53	50	59

Geographic Area	Number of Shares Held		Percentage of Issued Shares
USA		20,469,964		38.77	%
Canada		16,092,913		30.49	%
United Kingdom		15,672,353		29.69	%
Other		552,236		1.05	%
		52,787,466		100	%

	AIM (Pound Sterling)
Last Six Months	High	Low
March 2017 (up to 13 March)	1.14	1.12
February 2017	1.18	1.12
January 2017	1.18	0.83
December 2016	0.88	0.77
November 2016	1.33	0.84
October 2016	1.43	1.25
September 2016	1.37	1.00

2016	High	Low
Fourth Quarter ended December 31, 2016	1.43	0.77
Third Quarter ended September 31, 2016	1.37	0.75
Second Quarter ended June 30, 2016	0.74	0.57
First Quarter ended March 31, 2016	0.59	0.38

2015	High	Low
Fourth Quarter ended December 31, 2015	0.44	0.37
Third Quarter ended September 31, 2015	0.49	0.36
Second Quarter ended June 30, 2015	0.48	0.34
First Quarter ended March 31, 2015	0.38	0.33

2014	High	Low
Fourth Quarter ended December 31, 2014	0.49	0.30
Third Quarter ended September 31, 2014	0.50	0.42
Second Quarter ended June 30, 2014	0.42	0.35
First Quarter ended March 31, 2014	0.38	0.27

2013	High	Low
Fourth Quarter ended December 31, 2013	0.38	0.34
Third Quarter ended September 31, 2013	0.47	0.38
Second Quarter ended June 30, 2013	0.70	0.47
First Quarter ended March 31, 2013	0.66	0.45

Last Five Fiscal Years	High	Low
2016	1.43	0.38
2015	0.49	0.33
2014	0.50	0.27
2013	0.70	0.34
2012	0.63	0.33

	TSX (Canadian Dollars)
Last Six Months	High	Low
March 2017 (up to 14 March)	1.86	1.80
February 2017	1.98	1.77
January 2017	1.89	1.54
December 2016	1.45	1.28
November 2016	2.23	1.35
October 2016	2.39	2.09
September 2016	2.35	1.71

2016	High	Low
Fourth Quarter ended December 31, 2016	2.39	1.28
Third Quarter ended September 31, 2016	2.35	1.30
Second Quarter ended June 30, 2016	1.40	1.05
First Quarter ended March 31, 2016	1.12	0.79

2015	High	Low
Fourth Quarter ended December 31, 2015	0.84	0.67
Third Quarter ended September 31, 2015	0.96	0.70
Second Quarter ended June 30, 2015	0.95	0.66
First Quarter ended March 31, 2015	0.75	0.62

2014	High	Low
Fourth Quarter ended December 31, 2014	0.81	0.77
Third Quarter ended September 31, 2014	1.10	1.07
Second Quarter ended June 30, 2014	0.87	0.85
First Quarter ended March 31, 2014	0.80	0.77

Last Five Fiscal Years	High	Low
2016	2.39	0.79
2015	0.96	0.62
2014	0.90	0.86
2013	1.40	0.67
2012	1.25	0.60

	OTCQX (USD)
Last Six Months	High	Low
March 2017 (up to 13 March)	1.37	1.33
February 2017	1.53	1.36
January 2017	1.45	1.16
December 2016	1.14	0.96
November 2016	1.68	1.00
October 2016	1.82	1.55
September 2016	1.77	1.31

2016	High	Low
Fourth Quarter ended December 31, 2016	1.82	0.96
Third Quarter ended September 31, 2016	1.77	0.98
Second Quarter ended June 30, 2016	1.09	0.79
First Quarter ended March 31, 2016	0.89	0.54

2015	High	Low
Fourth Quarter ended December 31, 2015	0.66	0.49
Third Quarter ended September 31, 2015	0.76	0.53
Second Quarter ended June 30, 2015	0.79	0.52
First Quarter ended March 31, 2015	0.63	0.51

2014	High	Low
Fourth Quarter ended December 31, 2014	0.71	0.56
Third Quarter ended September 31, 2014	1.01	0.98
Second Quarter ended June 30, 2014	0.80	0.78
First Quarter ended March 31, 2014	0.73	0.70

Last Five Fiscal Years	High	Low
2016	1.82	0.54
2015	0.79	0.49
2014	0.81	0.78
2013	1.45	0.65
2012	1.25	0.65

	2016 USD‘000						2015 USD‘000					2014 USD‘000
	Functional currency						Functional currency					Functional currency
	ZAR			USD			ZAR			CAD		ZAR			CAD
Cash and cash equivalents		457			265			3,874			5,483		10,514			553
Trade and other payables		-			43			-			-		-			-
Intercompany balances^*		(30,552	)		(1,514	)		(27,650	)		44,390		(30,320	)		48,484
		(30,095	)		(1,206	)		(23,776	)		49,873		(19,806	)		49,037

	2016 USD‘000						2015 USD’000					2014 USD’000
	Functional currency						Functional currency					Functional currency
	ZAR			USD			ZAR			CAD		ZAR			CAD
Cash and cash equivalents		23			13			194			274		526			28
Trade and other payables					2			-			-		-			-
Intercompany balances^*		(1,527	)		(88	)		(1,382	)		2,219		(1,516	)		2,424

	2016⁽¹⁾		2015⁽¹⁾		2014⁽¹⁾
Audit fees		334,996		181,652		276,824
Audit – related fees				-		-
Tax fees ⁽²⁾		18,012		181950		56,414
All other fees		2,498		-		-
TOTAL		355,506		363,602		333,238

Blanket’s indigenisation shareholding percentages and facilitation loan balances
				Balance of facilitation loan #
USD 000's	Shareholding	NCI Recognised	NCI subject to facilitation loan	Dec, 31 2016	Dec, 31 2015
NIEEF	16%	3.2%	12.8%	11,990	11,907
Fremiro	15%	3.0%	12.0%	11,682	11,657
Community Trust	10%	10.0%	-	-	-
BETS	10%	-*	-*	7,788	7,772
	51%	16.2%	24.8%	31,460	31,336

Net income tax	2016			2015			2014

Income tax receivable		-			397			95
Income tax payable		(345	)		(53	)		(1,712	)
Net income tax (payable)/receivable		(345	)		344			(1,617	)

	Balance January 1, 2016			Recognised in profit or loss			Foreign exchange movement			Balance December 31, 2016
Property, plant and equipment		(12,988	)		(4,104	)		-			(17,092	)
Prepayments		(3	)		2			(2	)		(3	)
Provisions		733			477			8			1218
Provision for obsolete stock		-			12			-			12
Assessed loss		998			(998	)		-			-
Total		(11,260	)		(4,611	)		6			(15,865	)

	Balance January 1, 2015			Recognised in profit or loss			Foreign exchange movement			Balance December 31, 2015
Property, plant and equipment		(9,223	)		(3,765	)		-			(12,988	)
Prepayments		(22	)		16			3			(3	)
Provisions		565			184			(16	)		733
Assessed loss recognised		-			998			-			998
Total		(8,680	)		(2,567	)		(13	)		(11,260	)

	Balance January 1, 2014			Recognised in profit or loss			Foreign exchange movement			Balance December 31, 2014
Property, plant and equipment		(8,058	)		(835	)		(330	)		(9,223	)
Prepayments		-			-			(22	)		(22	)
Provisions		207			108			250			565
Inventory		(80	)		-			80			-
Other		(36	)		21			15			-
Total		(7,967	)		(706	)		(7	)		(8,680	)

Carrying amounts
At December 31, 2014	5,845	13,453	3,686	10,838	246	668	34,736
At December 31, 2015	5,668	27,377	6,224	9,102	281	566	49,218
At December 31, 2016	5,417	40,537	6,967	11,307	234	411	64,873

Long-term gold price per oz.		$	1,192
Discount rate			20	%
Life of mine
- GG	7 yrs
- Mascot	5 yrs
Incremental operational cost per tonne (at 100 tonnes per day)
- GG		$	42
- Mascot		$	44

Issued shares	Number of fully paid shares		Amount
January 1, 2014	52,117,908		54,569
December 31, 2014	52,117,908		54,569
Cancelled*	(39,000	)	-
December 31, 2015	52,078,908		54,569
Issued	708,520		433
December 31, 2016	52,787,428		55,002

Number of Options	Exercise Price	Expiry Date⁽¹⁾
	Canadian $
90,000	2.30	Oct 13, 2021
25,000	0.80	Oct 8, 2020
346,400	0.90	Sept 10, 2018
461,400

	RSU’s		PSU’s
Fair value (USD)	$	1.10	$	1.05
Share price (USD)	$	1.10	$	1.10
Performance multiplier percentage		-		100	%
Dividend yield		-		3.07	%
Share units granted up until reporting date:
	RSU’s		PSU’s
Grant - January 11, 2016		303,225		1,212,903
Grant – March 23, 2016		54,839		219,355
Grant – June 8, 2016		25,588		102,353
RSU dividend reinvestments		17,522		-
Total awards at December 31, 2016		401,174		1,534,611

	2016		2015
Non-current portion of term loan facility		1,577		-
Current portion of term loan facility		1,410		-
		2,987		-