SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington D.C. 20549

 

FORM 20-F

 

REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

OR

 

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20152016

 

OR

 

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from __________ to __________

 

SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

Date of event requiring this shell company report .................

 

Commission file number: 001-33773

 

 

 

B COMMUNICATIONS LTD.
(Exact Name of Registrant as specified in its charter
and translation of Registrant’s name into English)

 

Israel
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

2 Dov Friedman Street, Ramat Gan 5250301, Israel
(Address of principal executive offices)

 

Doron Turgeman, CEO, +972-3-9240000 (phone), +972-3-9399832 (fax)
2 Dov Friedman Street, Ramat Gan 5250301, Israel
(Name, telephone, e-mail and/or facsimile number and address of company contact person)

 

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered
Ordinary Shares, NIS 0.1 Par Value NASDAQ Global Select Market

 

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:None

 

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:None

 

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report:

 

Ordinary Shares, par value NIS 0.1 per share 29,889,045 shares
(as of December 31, 2015)2016)

 

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

 

Yes ☐                    No

 

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

 

Yes ☐                    No

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

 

Yes ☒                    No ☐

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

 

Yes ☒                    No

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.filer, or an emerging growth company. See definitionthe definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer, and large accelerated filer”“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filerAccelerated filer ☒
Emerging growth company ☐Non-accelerated filer ☐

If an emerging growth company that prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards† provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

† The term “new or revised financial accounting standard” refers to any update issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board to its Accounting Standards Codification after April 5, 2012.

 

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

 

U.S. GAAP ☐

International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board ☒

Other

 

If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow:

 

Item 17                     Item 18

 

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

 

Yes ☐                    No

 

 

 


INTRODUCTION

 

Our ordinary shares are listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market and on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange, or TASE (symbol: BCOM). On April 14, 2010, we completed the acquisition of the controlling 30.44% interest in Bezeq (TASE:BZEQ), Israel’s largest telecommunications provider, from Ap.Sb.Ar. Holdings Ltd. (a consortium of Apax Partners, Saban Capital Group and Arkin Communications) for an aggregate cash purchase price of approximately NIS 6.5 billion. In accordance with the terms of the transaction, effective as of the closing of the acquisition, we designated seven directors to replace the Apax-Saban-Arkin Group’s representatives on Bezeq’s 11 person Board of Directors. We began consolidating Bezeq’s financial results into our financial statements effective as of the closing of the acquisition.

 

The Bezeq Group operates the most comprehensive telecommunications infrastructure in Israel, with a broad range of telecommunications services across all of its markets. Through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, the Bezeq Group is a leading provider in Israel of fixed-line telephony services, fixed-line broadband Internet infrastructure access services, Internet service provider, or ISP, services, cellular telephony services, international telephony, or ILD, services, international and domestic data transfer and network services and information and communication technology, or ICT, services, pay television services and other communications infrastructures and services. In each of these markets, the Bezeq Group holds a significant market share.

 

As used in this annual report, the terms “we,” “us” and “our” mean B Communications Ltd. and its subsidiaries, unless otherwise indicated. As used in this annual report, “Internet Gold” means “Internet Gold - Golden Lines Ltd,” “Eurocom Communications” means “Eurocom Communications Ltd.,” “Bezeq” means Bezeq The Israel Telecommunications Corp. Ltd., “SP1” means B Communications (SP1) Ltd., “SP2” means B Communications (SP2) Ltd., “Pelephone” means Pelephone Communications Ltd., “Bezeq International” means Bezeq International Ltd. and “YES” (the trade name for DBS) and DBS mean DBS Satellite Services (1998) Ltd. Bezeq, Pelephone, Bezeq International and DBS are sometimes collectively referred to as the Bezeq Group in this annual report. The operations of DBS have been included in Bezeq’s consolidated financial statements since March 23, 2015, after Bezeq obtained control of DBS.

 

Our consolidated financial statements appearing in this annual report are prepared in New Israeli Shekels and are translated into U.S. dollars at the representative rate of exchange at December 31, 20152016 (NIS 3.9023.845 = $1.00). The dollar amounts so presented should not be construed as representing amounts receivable, payable or incurred in dollars or convertible into dollars. All references in this annual report to “dollars” or “$” are to U.S. dollars and all references in this annual report to “NIS” are to New Israeli Shekels.

 

Statements made in this annual report concerning the contents of any contract, agreement or other document are summaries of such contracts, agreements or documents and are not complete descriptions of all of their terms. If we filed any of these documents as an exhibit to this annual report or to any registration statement or annual report that we previously filed, you may read the document itself for a complete description of its terms.

 

Forward Looking StatementsFORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

Except for the historical information contained in this annual report, the statements contained in this annual report are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended, with respect to our business, financial condition and results of operations. Such forward-looking statements reflect our current view with respect to future events and financial results. We urge you to consider that statements which use the terms “anticipate,” “believe,” “do not believe,” “expect,” “plan,” “intend,” “estimate,” “anticipate” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. We remind readers that forward-looking statements are merely predictions and therefore inherently subject to uncertainties and other factors and involve known and unknown risks that could cause the actual results, performance, levels of activity, or our achievements, or industry results, to be materially different from any future results, performance, levels of activity, or our achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are also included in Item 4. “Information on the Company” and Item 5. “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects.” Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. Except as required by applicable law, including the securities laws of the United States, we undertake no obligation to publicly release any update or revision to any forward-looking statements to reflect new information, future events or circumstances, or otherwise after the date hereof. We have attempted to identify significant uncertainties and other factors affecting forward-looking statements in the Risk Factors section that appears in Item 3D. “Key Information - Risk Factors.”

 

We have a trademark registered in Israel for “B Communications.” All other registered trademarks appearing in this annual report are owned by their holders.

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

   Page
PART I 1
 ITEM 1.IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS1
 ITEM 2.OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE1
 ITEM 3.KEY INFORMATION1
  A.A.Selected Financial Data1
  B.B.Capitalization and Indebtedness2
  C.C.Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds2
  D.D.Risk Factors2
 ITEM 4.INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY1815
  A.A.History and Development of the Company1815
  B.B.Business Overview1916
  C.C.Organizational Structure7868
  D.D.Property, Plants and Equipment7969
 ITEM 4A.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS7969
 ITEM 5.OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS7969
  A.A.Operating Results7969
  B.B.Liquidity and Capital Resources9281
  C.C.Research and Development, Patents and Licenses11098
  D.D.Trend Information11099
  E.E.Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements11199
  F.F.Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations11199
 ITEM 6.DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES11199
  A.A.Directors and Senior Management11199
  B.CompensationB.113Compensation101
  C.C.Board Practices115103
  D.EmployeesD.119Employees107
  E.E.Share Ownership120108
 ITEM 7.MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS120108
  A.A.Major Shareholders120108
  B.B.Related Party Transactions122109
  C.C.Interests of Experts and Counsel113
ITEM 8.FINANCIAL INFORMATION113
A.Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information113
B.Significant Changes125
 ITEM 8.9.FINANCIAL INFORMATIONTHE OFFER AND LISTING125
  A.Consolidated StatementsA.Offer and Other Financial InformationListing Details125
  B.Significant ChangesB.143
Plan of DistributionITEM 9.THE OFFER AND LISTING143126
  A.Offer and Listing DetailsC.143Markets126
  B.Plan of DistributionD.144Selling Shareholders126
  C.MarketsE.144Dilution126
  D.Selling ShareholdersF.144Expense of the Issue126
ITEM 10.ADDITIONAL INFORMATION126
  E.DilutionA.144Share Capital126
  F.Expense of the IssueB.144
ITEM 10.ADDITIONAL INFORMATION145
     A.Share Capital145
     B.Memorandum and Articles of Association145126
  C.C.Material Contracts149130
  D.D.Exchange Controls149130
  E.TaxationE.149Taxation131
  F.F.Dividends and Paying Agents155136
  G.G.Statement by Experts155136
  H.H.Documents on Display155136
  I.I.Subsidiary Information156136

i

 ITEM 11.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISKS156136
 ITEM 12.DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES157137
PART II 157138
 ITEM 13.DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES157138
 ITEM 14.MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS157138
 ITEM 15.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES158138
 ITEM 16.[RESERVED]158139
 ITEM 16A.AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT158139
 ITEM 16B.CODE OF ETHICS158139
 ITEM 16C.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES159139
 ITEM 16D.EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES159140
 ITEM 16E.PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS159140
 ITEM 16F.CHANGES IN REGISTRANT’S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT159140
 ITEM 16G.CORPORATE GOVERNANCE159140
 ITEM 16H.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE160140
PART III 160141
 ITEM 17.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS160141
 ITEM 18.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS160141
 ITEM 19.EXHIBITS161141

 

ii

i
 

 

PART I

 

ITEM 1.IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS

 

Not applicable.

 

ITEM 2.OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE

 

Not applicable.

 

ITEM 3.KEY INFORMATION

 

A.Selected Financial Data

 

The tables below as of and for the five years ended December 31, 20152016 set forth selected consolidated financial data, which is derived from our audited consolidated financial statements. The audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 20142015 and 20152016 and for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2014, 2015 and 20152016 appear in this annual report.

 

Consolidated Statement of Income Data:

(Amounts in millions, except share and per share data)

 Year Ended December 31, 
 Year Ended December 31,  2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2016 
 2011   2012  2013    2014 2015 2015  (NIS)  (U.S. $) 
 (NIS in millions)( except share and per share data) ($ in millions), except share and per share data)              
Revenues  11,373   10,278   9,563   9,055   9,985   2,559   10,278   9,563   9,055   9,985   10,084   2,623 
Depreciation and amortization  2,984   2,367   2,014   1,873   2,131   546   2,367   2,014   1,873   2,131   2,161   563 
Salaries  2, 101   1,978   1,873   1,770   1,958   502   1,978   1,873   1,770   1,958   2,015   524 
General and operating expenses  4,462   3,995   3,584   3,368   3,876   993   3,995   3,584   3,368   3,876   4,021   1,046 
Other operating expenses(income)  326   (11)  57   (535)  3   1   (11)  57   (535)  10,0843   21   5 
Operating income  1,500   1,949   2,035   2,579   2,017   517 
Operating profit  1,949   2,035   2,579   2,017   1,866   485 
Finance expense  985   917   843   1,236   689   177   917   843   1,236   689   1,054   274 
Finance income  (485)  (562)  (523) (625)  (154)  (40)  (562)  (523)  (625)  (154)  (123)  (32)
Income after financing expenses (income), net  1,000   1,594   1,715   1,968   1,482   380 
Profit after financing expenses (income), net  1,594   1,715   1,968   1,482   935   243 
Share of losses (profit) in equity-accounted investee  216   245   252   170   (12)  (3)  245   252   170   (12)  5   1 
Income before income tax  784   1,349   1,463   1,798   1,494   383 
Income tax  656   556   524   667   358   92 
Net income for the year  128   793   939   1,131   1,136   291 
Income (loss) attributable to:                        
Profit before income tax  1,349   1,463   1,798   1,494   930   242 
Income tax expenses  556   524   667   358   442   115 
Net profit for the year  793   939   1,131   1,136   488   127 
Profit (loss) attributable to:                        
Owners of the company  (216)  46   137   (21)  210   54   46   137   (21)  210   (236)  (61)
Non-controlling interests  344   747   802   1,152   926   237   747   802   1,152   926   724   188 
Net income for the year  128   793   939   1,131   1,136   291 
Basic earnings (loss) per share  (7.26)  1.55   4.56   (0.70)  7.04   1.80 
Net profit for the year  793   939   1,131   1,136   488   127 
Basic earnings (loss) per share.  1.55   4.56   (0.70)  7.04   (7.92)  (2.06)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share  (7.30)  1.52   4.50   (0.81)  6.97   1.79   1.52   4.50   (0.81)  6.97   (7.92)  (2.06)

 

Statements of Financial Position:

(Amounts in millions)

 

 Year Ended December 31,  Year Ended December 31, 
 2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2015  2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2016 
 (NIS in millions)  ($ in millions)  (NIS)  (U.S. $) 
Cash and cash equivalents  1,369   757   739   713   581   149   757   739   713   581   762   198 
Restricted cash  -   -   -   65   155   40   -   -   65   155   -   - 
Total assets  24,912   22,629   21,083   21,236   22,122   5,669   22,629   21,083   21,236   22,122   20,145   5,239 
Total current liabilities  4,653   4,761   3,949   3,898   5,199   1,332   4,761   3,949   3,898   5,199   4,256   1,107 
Non-current liabilities  15,264   13,532   13,222   13,750   13,532   3,468   13,532   13,222   13,750   13,532   12,588   3,274 

 

 1 

 

 

Exchange Rate Information

 

The following table sets forth, for the periods and dates indicated, information regarding the Bank of Israel representative rate of exchange for dollars, expressed in NIS per one dollar. The representative rate is the average between the buying rate and the selling rate of exchange. We do not use such rates in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein. See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Form 20-F.

 

Period Average 
    
Year ended December 31, 20113.578
Year ended December 31, 2012  3.856 
Year ended December 31, 2013  3.611 
Year ended December 31, 2014  3.578 
Year ended December 31, 2015  3.887 
Year ended December 31, 20163.841

 

Period High  Low 
       
November 2015  3.921   3.868 
December 2015  3.905   3.855 
January 2016  3.983   3.913 
February 2016  3.964   3.871 
March 2016  3.912   3.766 
April 2016 (through April 18)  3.819   3.765 
Period High  Low 
       
October 2016  3.856   3.778 
November 2016  3.876   3.799 
December 2016  3.867   3.787 
January 2017  3.860   3.769 
February 2017  3.768   3.659 
March 2017  3.693   3.614 
April 2017 (through April 25)  3.681   3.628 

 

On April18, 2016, 25, 2017, the representative rate of exchange was NIS 3.7853.648 = $1.00 as published by the Bank of Israel.

 

B.Capitalization and Indebtedness

 

Not applicable.

 

C.Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds

 

Not applicable.

 

D.Risk Factors

 

Investing in our ordinary shares involves a high degree of risk and uncertainty. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below before investing in our ordinary shares. If any of the following risks actually occurs, our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations could be harmed. In that case, the value of our ordinary shares could decline, and you could lose all or part of your investment.

Risks Relating to the Bezeq Group’sFixed Line Business

 

Competition from other telecommunications providers and recent and potential changes in the competitive environment and communications technologies could adversely affect the Bezeq Group’sBezeq’s business, results of operations and financial condition.

 

The Bezeq Group faces significant competition in the domestic fixed-line communications industry has recently intensified, both from establishedother domestic carriers including HOT, Bezeq’s principal competitor in this segment, and new competitors who providesecondarily from other cellular telephony, fixed-line telephony, fixed-line broadband Internet infrastructure access, ISP and pay television services. In addition tooperators. Competition strengthened significantly upon implementation of the entrance of new competitors, competition amongwholesale market by the existingprincipal communications groups in Israel is intensifying. Four main groups, each consistingand other communications operators (holders of companies under commonspecial or joint control, hold a significant shareunified licenses) who compete with Bezeq in selling end-to-end service packages based on Bezeq’s infrastructures at prices prescribed by the Ministry of the communications market in Israel today: theCommunications and not pursuant to commercial terms determined by negotiation. Bezeq Group, the Cellcom Group, the Partner Group and the HOT Group. The Bezeq Group’s three principal competitors may in some cases be required to comply with fewer regulations because, among other reasons, they use different technologies to provide their services or do not own their own fixed-line network.

Competitionalso face competition in the cellular telephony industry has intensified since 2012. Thisfuture from potential infrastructure owners. The increased competition has led to the churn of some of Bezeq’s customers and has caused Bezeq to lower its prices for certain services and higher customer churn rates, which in turn has affected the results of Pelephone and the Bezeq Group. Bezeq expects competition to continue toan increase amid the changing legislation in Israel and consolidation in the telecommunications industrycost of acquiring new customers and retaining existing ones. The entities competing with Bezeq at present or those that permits certain service providers to market a combination of fixed-line telephony, fixed-line broadband Internet infrastructure access, ISP and pay television services, or a “bundle”, for an aggregate price which is lower than the price of the individual products and servicesmight compete with it in the bundle.future, benefit from greater business flexibility than Bezeq, including the ability to cooperate with subsidiaries and affiliates for marketing joint packages of services. The ability of HOT to offer “Triple Play” and other packages with tariff flexibility compared with the restrictions that prevent Bezeq Groupfrom doing the same, has adversely impacted Bezeq's ability to compete and its cash flow from operations.

Bezeq is currently subject to restrictionsgovernmental control and regulation

Bezeq is subject to government control and regulation relating, among other things, to the licensing of operations, setting permitted areas of operation, setting tariffs, operation, competition, payment of royalties, providing universal service, share ownership, relations between Bezeq and its subsidiaries and a ban on marketing bundles, which are stricter thanceasing or limiting its services (which could oblige Bezeq to provide services under uneconomic circumstances). The continuing governmental control and regulation has at times resulted in government intervention that Bezeq believes impedes its business activities. In this regard, Bezeq is exposed to the restrictions applicable to its competitors. In addition, Bezeq expects additional competitive pressure will arise fromimposition of various sanctions by the convergenceMinistry of broadcasting and communication technologies, which may lead participants in the Israeli media and telecommunications industries to offer bundles of fixed-line telephony and cellular telephony, Internet and/or video broadcast services in competition with it. These competitive forces may create further downward pressure on prices, which may result in a decrease in the Bezeq Group’s average revenue per user, or ARPU, and increase the Bezeq Group companies’ churn rates.Communications, including fines. In addition, the Minister of Communications has the authority to change the terms of Bezeq's license, affect existing tariffs and marketing offerings, and impose directives on Bezeq. Significant changes in the regulatory principles applicable to the communications industry as a whole and to Bezeq Group companies may bear higher costs if they introduce new products or servicesin particular, could require Bezeq to maintain or improve their competitive positioningmake changes to its strategic plans and reduce subscriber churn. Furthermore, technological developments and falling equipment prices could enable other operators to provide services similar to those provided by the Bezeq Group at much lower costs. In combination with difficult economic environments, these competitive pressures could adversely impact the Bezeq Group’sharm its ability to increase, or in certain cases maintain,plan its ARPUs, operating cash flows and liquidity.business activities for the long term.

 

 2 

 

 

In November 2014, the Minister of Communications, or the Minister, amended the licenses of Bezeq and Hot Telecommunications, the two infrastructure owners in Israel, to define the basket of services under the licenses (managed broadband access and wholesale telephony services). The applicable new regulations include the obligation to provide the services, including accompanying services, and the regulation of maximum rates (which require the Finance Minister’s approval) for the provision of the wholesale services.

The ongoing implementation of the wholesale market regulation may have a significant negative impact on the Bezeq Group which cannot be quantified at this time. However, the Bezeq Group may in the future be granted a permit to provide non-divisible bundles of services and the structural separation may be cancelled.

Domestic fixed-line telephony is regulated and controlled by the Ministry of Communications, which regulation is based on, among other things, the issuance of licenses to entities operating in the segment.

Fixed-line telephony is characterized by an intense competitive dynamic. Bezeq's competitors are HOT Telecom (which, pursuant to a decision by the Minister in 2014, obtained an extension for its mandatory implementation of universal services in full deployment), VoB service providers that have operated for several years under licenses with no obligation to provide universal service, and without their own independent access infrastructure, and entities related to Internet ISPs and international communication services providers. Some of the competitors are part of the three other telecommunications groups, and Bezeq believes that cellular companies are also competitors in the telephony segment. Following the decision and implementation of the wholesale telephony service in a resale format, service providers with a unified license that were permitted to provide domestic carrier services without any infrastructure at all will compete with Bezeq by offering basic telephony services that are identical to Bezeq's services to Bit Stream Access, or BSA, service subscribers.

Upon application of the wholesale market, ISPs and holders of a general special license will compete with Bezeq, among others, in the provision of service packages that include broadband services, using Bezeq's infrastructure at wholesale prices. Communication operators that compete with Bezeq may buy services from Bezeq at supervised prices, including infrastructure segments, and thus compete with Bezeq by selling complete service packages to their customers.

Fixed-Line Broadband Internet Infrastructure Access. Bezeq’s principal competitor in the fixed-line broadband Internet infrastructure access service market is HOT, which is currently the only other fixed-line broadband Internet infrastructure access provider in Israel. Bezeq’s fixed-line broadband Internet infrastructure access services business also faces competition from cellular telephony operators who are increasingly able to utilize a combination of technologically advanced and high bandwidth technologies, such as universal mobile telecommunications system, or UMTS, and long term evolution, or LTE, technologies. Under the Ministry of Communications’ policy for the establishment of a wholesale market for fixed-line telephony and broadband Internet infrastructure access, Bezeq will be required to provide access to its fixed-line broadband Internet network infrastructure to other service providers on a wholesale basis, which may increase competition in the fixed-line broadband Internet infrastructure access market.

HOT has not provide wholesale services as yet because of the absence of the approval of a pricing structure by the Ministry of Communications. On January 14, 2016, the Ministry of Communications published guidelines to determine the maximum tariffs for wholesale services on HOT's network.

The Internet segment is characterized by high rates of penetration as a result of the deployment of a national access infrastructure. Bezeq’s main competitor in this area is HOT, and Bezeq is also exposed to competition from the cellular companies. Upon implementation of a wholesale market, ISPs and unified general license holders will be able to compete with Bezeq by providing packages of services, including broadband services, using Bezeq's infrastructures, at wholesale tariffs. In addition, following the decision regarding wholesale telephony services for resale, unified license holders authorized to provide domestic carrier services will also be able to include telephony services in their packages.

In the transmission and data-communications sector, Bezeq competes mainly with HOT Telecom, Cellcom and Partner, who operate as communication groups and provide full communications solutions to their customers.

Competition in the industry depends on a number of factors, such as regulatory decisions, possible changes in the terms of the licenses of Bezeq and its subsidiaries and in the terms of the licenses of their competitors, mergers and joint ventures between companies that compete with the Bezeq Group, possible repercussions of the Concentration Law, further development of the wholesale market, the lack of symmetry between the Bezeq Group and its competitors’ ability to provide a comprehensive service, the new services that Bezeq will be permitted to provide, the tariff policy, the extent of flexibility allowed to the Bezeq Group when offering service bundles and technological developments.

3

In addition to HOT's cable and optical fiber network and the optical fiber infrastructures of Cellcom and Partner, there are a number of infrastructures in Israel today that have the potential to serve as communications infrastructures based on optical fibers. These infrastructures are mostly owned by government companies and bodies, including the infrastructures of the Israel Electric Corporation, or IEC, Israel Railways, Mekorot Israel National Water Company, or Mekorot, Petroleum & Energy Infrastructure Ltd. and Cross Israel Highway Ltd. Some municipalities are also trying to create an alternative to communications license holders by deploying their own infrastructures.

In August 2013, IBC Israel Broadband Company (2013) Ltd., or IBC, (60% of which is owned by a group of investors headed by the ViaEurope Group and 40% is owned by IEC) was granted a general license for the provision of communication infrastructure services (i.e., data communications, digital transmission and VPN) over fiber optics. In accordance with the license, IBC will enter into an agreement with IEC to obtain the right to use its fiber-optics network and will become the network’s operator. In addition, IBC is entitled to use the communication facilities of another operator. Pursuant to the provisions of the license, IBC was obligated to make a gradual universal deployment over a period of 20 years.

At the same time, IBC received a special license for the provision of domestic fixed data-communication services, according to which it is entitled to provide IP/VPN services and broadband data-communication lines for a period of five years (with the option to request an extension). This special license does not necessitate the provision of universal services to all the residents in Israel.

Bezeq estimates that the significant relief granted to IBC in respect of the obligation to provide universal service (the option to make a gradual universal deployment over a long period of time), the granting of a special license for the provision of data-communication services without providing universal service, and the possibility that IBC will be allowed to receive wholesale infrastructure services from Bezeq may adversely affect Bezeq’s operations and its financial results.

Cellular Telephony. There are five operators with cellular licenses operating in the cellular communications market in Israel today (Pelephone, Cellcom, Partner, Golan Telecom and HOT Mobile) and a few MVNO operators with cellular licenses for hosting on another network. The principal MVNO is Rami Levy. The entry of new operators into the market since 2012 has led to fierce competition resulting in higher subscriber churn rates, significant price erosion and eroded margins.

In 2012, subsequent to the Ministry of Communications gaining the right to allocate new frequencies and operating licenses, Golan Telecom began operating as a new operator and HOT Mobile began operating a UMTS network. As a condition to the issuance of their licenses, the new operators undertook to establish independent nationwide networks (with temporary hosting on existing networks on a domestic roaming basis).

In January 2015, under the 4G frequency tender, Marathon 018 Ltd. was awarded a 5MHz bandwidth frequency, subject to compliance with the requirements under the tender. If Marathon 018 receives a cellular operator license, it will become the sixth non-MVNO operator.

In November 2015, Cellcom entered into an agreement with Golan Telecom to acquire 100% of Golan Telecom's subscribers. If approved, this agreement will reduce the number of infrastructure operators to four (or five if Marathon 018 is added). Golan Telecom has not yet complied with its commitment to establish a nationwide independent network. If this agreement is not approved, Golan Telecom will be required to operate on an infrastructure sharing basis.

In April 2015, the Minister approved a network sharing agreement between Partner and HOT Mobile to operate active radio segment infrastructures. Subsequent to gaining the approval, Partner and HOT Mobile established a joint company that received a special license to provide cellular radio infrastructure services to a MVNO operator. This license is valid for 10 years. In September 2014, Pelephone entered into a collaboration agreement with Cellcom for the maintenance of passive components at the cellular sites owned by the two companies, which is expected to reduce maintenance costs at these sites. The agreement provides for maintenance of the shared sites through a supplier that will be selected by Pelephone and Cellcom.

International Telephony. The ILD market in Israel is characterized by a high degree of competition. At the end of 2015, there were eight companies offering ILD services to private and business customers in Israel. Changes in licensing policies and the expanded use of VoIP technology have significantly reduced the barriers of entry into this market. In addition, cellular telephony operators now offer ILD services as part of the unlimited packages they offered. Further, a recent hearing published by the Ministry of Communications proposes the adoption of a new regulatory regime allowing domestic fixed-line operators and cellular telephony operators to provide ILD services as part of the service packages they offer to their subscribers. We expect competition in this market, including price competition, to increase in the future.

4

Internet Service Providers. Access to broadband Internet in Israel requires households to purchase Internet access services from a licensed ISP and broadband Internet infrastructure access services from a separate provider. While there are only two fixed-line broadband Internet infrastructure access service providers in Israel (Bezeq and HOT), many telecommunication companies hold ISP licenses in Israel, including Bezeq International, 013 Netvision (which merged with Cellcom), 012 Smile (which merged with Partner), HOT Net and numerous minor niche players. The Israeli ISP market is a saturated market and as competitors are typically unable to differentiate themselves based on price, they attempt to differentiate themselves primarily by strengthening customer loyalty; however, competition has led to increased churn rates and reduced income per customer.

Pay Television. The Israeli television market is characterized by a very high penetration rate and an increasing emphasis on new television technology, in particular digital, HD and interactive television services, such as Video on Demand, or VOD, requiring high-bandwidth and bi-directional distribution platforms. In the multi-channel pay television market, DBS and HOT are the only two companies in Israel licensed to provide multi-channel pay television broadcasts. Other factors impacting competition in the market include the availability of free-to-air digital terrestrial television, or DTT, channels and the increasing availability and quality of video content offered over the Internet and cellular networks, which is not currently regulated and does not require designated infrastructure. We believe that the implementation of certain regulatory changes, including the expansion in the number and variety of free-to-air DTT channels and the possible appointment of a private entity to operate the DTT system instead of the Second Authority, which is the public authority that supervises commercial broadcasting in Israel, may increase competition in the television market.

There can be no assurance that the measures taken by the Bezeq Group companies to streamline their operations and improve the services they provide to differentiate themselves from their competitors will be successful. If the Bezeq Group companies are unsuccessful in their efforts, the Bezeq Group’s business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

The Bezeq Group operates in a highly regulated telecommunications market, which limits its flexibility in managing its business and may materially and adversely affect its results of operations.

The Bezeq Group operates in a highly regulated industry in Israel, which limits its flexibility in managing its business efficiently, and may increase its administrative and operational expenses and limit its revenue. The Bezeq Group is subject to government supervision and regulation relating to, among other things:

regulations requiring structural separation between the members of the Bezeq Group;

regulations restricting the Bezeq Group’s ability to market bundles;

price regulation for certain services that the Bezeq Group provides;

rules and regulations imposed on telecommunications service providers with significant market share;

rules governing the interconnection between different telephone networks and the interconnection rates that the Bezeq Group can charge and pay;

regulations governing the prohibition of exit-fees or cancellation charges;

regulations requiring the Bezeq Group to grant other telecommunications operators access to its infrastructure;

regulations governing roaming charges and other billing and customer service matters;

rules for authorizations, licensing, acquisitions, renewals, pledging and transfers of licenses;

requirements covering a variety of operational areas such as land use, health and safety and environmental protection, technical standards and subscriber service requirements rules and regulations relating to subscriber privacy;

rules and regulations relating to universal service provision and requirements to extend the Bezeq Group’s services to areas of Israel even where it is not economically profitable to do so; and

regulations restricting the number of television channels DBS can own and specifying the minimum investment DBS is required to make in local content productions.

5

Bezeq’s tariffs for its fixed-line services are subject to governmentgovernmental control, which harms its ability to compete and places downward pressurecould have a material adverse effect on its tariffs, which adversely affects its business.

 

Bezeq’s tariffs for its main services (including interconnect fees) are subject to government control and intervention. The Minister of Communications is authorized to intervene in existing tariffs and marketing offeringsoffers and impose directives on Bezeq. On average, Bezeq’s controlled tariffs erode in real terms. Significant changes in Bezeq’s controlled tariffs, if implemented could have a materiallymaterial adverse effect on Bezeq'sBezeq’s business and financial results. Furthermore,Additionally, the limitationsrestrictions applicable to Bezeq in marketing alternative tariff packages could create difficultiespayment bundles may make it difficult for Bezeq in offeringto provide an appropriate competitive responsesolution to market changes and have placed Bezeq at a disadvantage to those competing with it in the market.sale of end-to-end service packages using wholesale Bitstream Access services, or BSA services, supplied by Bezeq. In the context of the applicationimplementation of a wholesale market, the Ministry of Communications has the power to set the price atfor which Bezeq will sell its services to license holders. The low prices that have been determinedset by the Ministry of Communications may adversely affect Bezeq's level of revenues and profits.

 

Bezeq could be subject to labor disruptions.

Bezeq's implementation of human resources and organization plans, including retirement and restructuring plans, involves coordination with its workers and significant costs, including compensation for early retirement. The implementation processes of such plans may cause unrest in labor relations and be damaging to Bezeq Groupongoing activities.

Bezeq is subject to restrictions on intercompany relations with its principal subsidiaries, which harms its ability to compete and adversely affects its business.

 

Bezeq’sBezeq's general license for domestic fixed-line communication services obligates it to ensure that its relationships with its principal subsidiaries do not result in favoring them over their competitors. BezeqSeparation is also subject to various limitations as a result ofrequired between the State of Israel declaring it a monopoly in the fixed-line services business. In addition, Bezeq is subject to limitations set forth in merger approvals granted by the Israeli Antitrust Authority. As a result of such limitations, separationmanagements of Bezeq and its principal subsidiaries’ management,those companies, as is separation between the business, financial and marketing systems, assets and employees, is required, which results incauses duplication and high administrativeadministration overheads. In addition, Bezeq is also subjectcurrently limited in its ability to limitationsoffer joint service bundles with respectthose companies. Due to the offeringentry of bundlescompanies into direct competition with its principal subsidiaries, which adversely impacts its business, particularly in light of the entry into the market of communications companies competing directly with Bezeq in most of its areas of operation based on the provision of bundledservice bundles to customers and the option of providing wholesale services in order to offer customers end-to-end services, the customer.

Potential health risks related to cellular network sitesrisk that this factor will affect Bezeq's operations and cellular telecommunication devices could have a material adverse effect on Pelephone’s business, results of operations and financial condition.

Several lawsuits have been filed against cellular telephony operators and other participants in the cellular industry alleging adverse health effects and other claims relating to radio frequency transmissions to and from sites, handsets and other cellular telecommunications devices, including lawsuits against Pelephone. Although these lawsuits were settled during 2013 with no material expenses incurred, there can be no guarantee that potential future lawsuits will have favorable outcomes. Any exposure to such liabilities could have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Pelephone takes steps to ensure that the levels of radiation emitted by its transmission facilities, equipment and devices do not exceed the levels of radiation permitted in the directives of the Israeli Ministry of Environmental Protection which align with international standards. However, health risks may be found to exist and transmission sites or devices and equipment may emit more radiation than that allowed in radiation standards, causing a risk to health, which may have an adverse effect on Pelephone’s business and could result in a reduction in the use of cellular telephony services, difficulty in renting sites, claims for physical and property damages in substantial amounts and attempts to exercise the deeds of indemnity that Pelephone deposited with the planning authorities pursuant to the Planning and Construction Law. Pelephone’s third-party liability insurance policy does not currently cover electromagnetic radiation.

Under the Planning and Construction Law, local planning committees may be held liable for the depreciation of the value of nearby properties as a result of approving a building plan or permit. Under the Israeli Radiation Law, the National Council for Planning and Construction requires indemnification undertakings from cellular companies as a precondition to obtaining a building permit for new or existing cellular network sites. The National Council has decided that until the national building plan is amended to reflect a different indemnification amount, Pelephone, as well as other cellular telephony operators, will be required to indemnify it in full against all losses resulting from claims for reductions in property values as a result of granting a permit for a cellular site.

The Bezeq Group may face difficulties in obtaining some of the building and environmental permits required for the establishment and operation of its network sites, which could have an adverse effect on the coverage, quality and capacity of its network.

The Bezeq Group, mainly with respect to its Pelephone cellular telephony operations, is subject to the Israeli Radiation Law, which regulates the emission of electromagnetic radiation from broadcast facilities. The Israeli Radiation Law prohibits, among other things, the construction or operation of a source of radiation in contravention of any applicable permit and the construction or operation of a source of radiation without a permit. After receiving a written warning from the authorities, failure to remedy a violation will subject the permit holder, officers and directors to civil liability or criminal prosecution on a strict liability basis. While the Bezeq Group is constantly working to obtain or renew permits to set up and operate its various broadcasting installations, the policies maintained by the various regulators and amendments to applicable statutes and standards could adversely impact the infrastructure of such installations. Any such adverse impact could affect the services offered over Pelephone’s infrastructure, the result of which could have a material adverse effect on the revenues of the Bezeq Group from such services. The establishment of a broadcasting site without obtaining a building permit constitutes, among other things, a breach of the Planning and Construction Law, and in some instances, this has resulted in demolition orders against sites, indictments or the initiation of civil proceedings against Pelephone and some of its officers. Pelephone has succeeded in most of these instances to avoid demolition or to delay the execution of demolition orders pursuant to arrangements it reached with the planning and building authorities to resolve the lack of licensing. These arrangements have not required any admission of guilt by officers of Pelephone or their conviction. However, it is not certain that this will continue in the future, or that there will be no further instances in which demolition orders are issued and indictments are filed in respect of building permits, including against officers.

6

The establishment and operation of communications facilities in Israel are also subject to building permits from various planning and building committees, a process that involves a number of approvals from Israeli state entities and regulatory bodies. Bezeq’s and Pelephone’s inability to obtain such approvals and permits in the future may impair the quality and capacity of their existing networks and the deployment of new networks.

The deployment and manner of set-up of communications facilities in Israel are regulated by the National Outline Plan for Communications 36, or NOP 36, and National Outline Plan for Communications 56 in the Palestinian Administered Territories, or NOP 56. These plans were designed to ensure coverage for transmitting and receiving radio, television and wireless communications, while avoiding radiation hazards, minimizing damage to the environment and simplifying and increasing the efficiency of the processes involved in setting up new facilities.

Difficulties in obtaining approvals for the construction and operation of cellular network sites and other cellular network infrastructure could have an adverse effect on the extent, coverage and capacity of our cellular network, thus impacting the quality of the Bezeq Group’s voice and data services and ability to continue to market its products and services effectively.

Pelephone, like the other cellular telephony operators in Israel, provides repeaters, also known as bi-directional amplifiers, to subscribers seeking an interim solution to weak signal reception within specific indoor locations. Due to the lack of a clear policy of the local planning and building authorities, and in light of the practice of the other cellular telephone operators, Pelephone has not requested permits under the Planning and Construction Law for the repeaters. If the local planning and building authorities determine that permits under the Planning and Construction Law are also necessary for the installation of these devices, or any other receptors that Pelephone believes do not require a building permit, it could have a negative impact on its ability to obtain permits for its repeaters.

The construction and operation of a “Source of Radiation” and the provision of a radiation measurement service requires a permit. Bezeq obtained operating permits for the communication facilities and broadcasting sites it operates. Bezeq also took steps to obtain radiation permits for its high-voltage facilities, and permits were received for 27 such high-voltage facilities. Permits for two other facilities are pending. The law includes a punitive chapter under which the construction or operation of a source of radiation in violation of the provisions of the permit and the construction or operation of a source of radiation without a permit, after having been warned in writing, are strict liability offenses.

Approximately 20% of the Bezeq Group’s cell sites are wireless access devices that operate in reliance on an exemption from the requirement to obtain a building permit. Bezeq Group’s reliance on the exemption for wireless access devices have been challenged and is currently awaiting ruling by the Israeli Supreme Court. Under an interim order issued by the Supreme Court in September 2010, the Bezeq Group is unable to further construct wireless access devices in cellular networks in reliance on the exemption. Under a decision of the Supreme Court of February 2011, the order will not apply to the replacement of existing wireless access devices under certain conditions. In September 2011, the interim order was relaxed to allow two new UMTS operators, Hot Mobile and Golan Telecom, to construct wireless access devices in reliance on the exemption until July 31, 2012 and was thereafter extended several times.

Should the Israeli Supreme Court determine that all wireless access devices without building permits must be removed, it could have a negative impact on Pelephone and the Bezeq Group.

The Bezeq Group’s systems and operations are vulnerable to damage or interruption, which could expose it to material risk of loss or litigation.

The Bezeq Group provides services using various infrastructure systems that include exchanges, transmission, data communication and access systems, cables and computerized systems. Any failure to manage the growth and complexity of the Bezeq Group’s networks could lead to a degradation of service and network disruptions that could harm its reputation and result in a loss of subscribers.

Under its cellular license and the Wireless Telegraph Ordinance, Pelephone has rights of use of frequencies in the 850 MHz spectrum for operating its CDMA network, in the 850 MHz and 2100 MHz spectrums to operate its UMTS/HSPA network, and in the 1800 MHz spectrum for operating its LTE technology network. The frequencies assigned to Pelephone are exposed to interruptions that could impair the service quality of the networks that it operates.

7

Although some of the Bezeq Group’s systems have backup, damage to some or all of these systems, whether due to a technical fault or natural disaster, could cause extreme difficulties in providing services. If any part of the Bezeq Group’s infrastructure, including its IT systems, cellular information systems, communications lines, antenna sites, equipment or technology becomes subject to a flood, fire, other natural disaster, terrorism, acts of war, a computer virus, a power loss, material bugs in software or other catastrophe or unauthorized access, its operations and customer relations could be materially adversely affected. In addition, disaster recovery, security and service continuity protection measures that the Bezeq Group companies have, or may in the future undertake, and their monitoring of network performance, may be insufficient to prevent losses.

Although no incidents have occurred in numbers that are statistically significant, the Bezeq Group’s networks and other technical equipment have been, and may continue to be, subject to occasional malfunctions due to material bugs in software or technical shortcomings or imperfect interfaces with equipment in private homes, the networks of other operators or its own networks or with other surrounding equipment. The Bezeq Group might incur liabilities or reputational damages as a result of such malfunctions.

In addition, the Bezeq Group accumulates, stores and uses data in the ordinary course of its operations that is protected by data protection laws. Although the Bezeq Group takes precautions to protect subscriber and employee data in accordance with the applicable Israeli privacy requirements, it may fail to do so, and certain subscriber and employee data may be leaked or otherwise used inappropriately. Violation of data protection laws may result in fines, loss of reputation and subscriber churn and could have an adverse effect on the Bezeq Group’s business, financial condition and results of operations.increased.

 

Bezeq Group companies areis subject to legal proceedings, which could result in themits being ordered to pay significant sums.

 

The Bezeq Group companies are subjectis a party to legal proceedings, including class actions, which could result in themit being ordered to pay significant sums. Classsums, most of which cannot be estimated, and therefore, no provisions have been made in Bezeq’s financial statements for most of them. In addition, Bezeq's insurance policies are limited to defined cover limits and to certain causes of action, and might not cover claims can relate to a small loss for a single customercertain types of damages. In recent years, class actions against large commercial companies have become more numerous and yet can become a material claim for the Bezeq Group, if certified as asevere. By their very nature, class action applicable to all customersactions may result in significant judgments or a significant portion of them.settlements. In addition, since Bezeq provides communications infrastructureinfrastructures as well as billing services to other licensees, parties suing those licensees in other class actions mayare also likely to try to involve Bezeq as a party to such proceedings.

 

The markets in which the Bezeq Group operates require material capital investments in infrastructure, subscriber equipment and changing technology, which imposes a heavy financial burden on the Bezeq Group and consequently, its capital expenditures may not generate a positive return.

The markets in which the Bezeq Group operates are characterized by the need to make material capital investments in infrastructure and subscriber equipment as a result of changing technology. The frequent technological changes in infrastructure and terminal equipment and the intense competition in various market segments impose a heavy financial burden on the companies operating in the telecommunications market, requiring them to update their infrastructure technology from time to time or to introduce new devices into the market at heavy cost. The development of new technologies can render existing technologies obsolete, resulting in the need for large monetary investments in order to retain a competitive position. The Bezeq Group’s future success will depend on its ability to develop and introduce, on a timely and cost-effective basis, new infrastructure and subscriber equipment that keep pace with technological developments. If the Bezeq Group is unable to respond promptly and effectively to changing technology, it will be unable to compete effectively in the future and its business could be adversely affected. No assurance can be given that the Bezeq Group’s recent or future capital expenditures will generate a positive return or that it will have adequate capital available to finance such future upgrades. If the Bezeq Group is unable to, or elects not to, pay for costs associated with expanding or upgrading its networks, or making other capital expenditures, its growth and competitive position could be materially adversely affected.

The Bezeq Group requires licenses from the Ministry of Communications to operate its business and is subject to monitoring and enforcement by the regulator.

The Bezeq Group conducts its operations pursuant to licenses granted by the Ministry of Communications for specified periods, which may be extended for additional periods upon request. There is no certainty that such licenses will be renewed or extended in the future and any cancellation or change in the terms of the Bezeq Group’s licenses may materially affect its business and results of operations, including the immediate acceleration of some of its debt.

Although we believe that the Bezeq Group is currently in compliance with all material requirements of its licenses, the interpretation and application of the technical standards used to measure these requirements, including the minimum quality standards and other license provisions, disagreements may arise in the future between the Ministry of Communications and the Bezeq Group. In addition, following recent amendments to the Communications Law introducing administrative enforcement, the Bezeq Group may be subjected to administrative enforcement proceedings and monetary sanctions. The Bezeq Group has provided significant bank guarantees to the Ministry of Communications to guarantee its performance under its licenses. If the Bezeq Group is found to be in material breach of its licenses, the guarantees may be forfeited and the licenses may be revoked. In addition, the Ministry of Communications is authorized to levy significant fines for breaches of the Bezeq Group’s licenses, which could have a material adverse effect on the Bezeq Group’s financial condition or results of operations.

8

Under the Concentration Law, Bezeq and each corporation owned by Bezeq and by the Eurocom Group (a private telecommunications group in Israel that has investments in telecommunications, satellite services, media, consumer electronic products, real estate, financial services and additional fields) is deemed a “Concentrating Entity,” within the meaning of the Concentration Law. In addition, DBS is deemed to be an influential entity in the broadcasting field and, as a result, it too is deemed a “Concentrating Entity.” Accordingly, each award of rights (including the award of a license) by a governmental authority in an “Essential Infrastructure Field,” within the meaning of the Concentration Law, and the extension of existing licenses held by any of the Bezeq Group companies, are subject to the procedures set out in the Concentration Law, including the consideration of control concentration factors and factors relating to the promotion of an industry’s competitiveness, as well as consulting with the Committee for Reducing Concentration. The governmental authority and the Committee are obliged to consider, among other things, factors concerning the prevention of the expansion of the operations of the “Concentrating Entity.” If, as a result of the implementation of the procedures under the Concentration Law, a license is not granted to a Bezeq Group company or an existing license is not extended, the Bezeq Group’s business could be adversely impacted. Furthermore, some of the competitors of the Bezeq Group companies are not, and future competitors may not, be deemed a Concentrating Entity and therefore, are not subject to the foregoing restricting procedures which could give them a competitive advantage over the Bezeq Group companies.

The Bezeq Group’s brands are subject to reputational risks.

The Bezeq Group’s brands are well recognized in Israel. The Bezeq Group companies, including Bezeq, Pelephone, Bezeq International and DBS, have developed their brands through extensive marketing campaigns, website promotions, customer referrals, and the use of sales forces and dealer networks. The Bezeq Group’s brands represent a material and valuable asset. Although the Bezeq Group companies try to manage their brands, we cannot guarantee that such brands will not be damaged by any inability to remain technologically competitive, by circumstances that are external their control or by third parties with a resulting negative impact on the Bezeq Group’s activities.

The Bezeq Group’s results ofBezeq’s operations are subject to market risks such as currency fluctuations, inflation in Israel and the general economic environment and financial condition of the capital markets in Israel and worldwide.

 

The Bezeq Group’s results of operations are subject to market risks such as currency fluctuations, the general economic conditions, inflation in Israel and the financial condition of the capital market in Israel and worldwide. The Bezeq Group measures exposure to changes in exchange rates and inflation by the surplus or deficit of assets against liabilities. In addition, Bezeq is exposedliabilities, based on the type of linkage. While Bezeq's exposure to inflationary changes in Israel as well ascurrency exchange rates against the shekel is low, its exposure to market risks associated with changesinflation rates is high, and therefore Bezeq takes steps to cover part of the interest rates relating to its borrowings. In addition, Bezeq’s tariff updating mechanism, which is subject to government regulation, is reviewed once a year and is influenced by the Israeli Consumer Price Index, or CPI.inflation exposure. As a result, the annual rate of inflation and its distribution during the year can have a material influence on the erosion of Bezeq’s tariffs and its revenues and expenses during the year, which in turn could have a material adverse impact on its operating results.

 

From time to time, the Bezeq Group engages in currency hedging transactions to reduce the impact on its cash flows and results of operations of currency fluctuations. The Bezeq Group recognizes freestanding derivative financial instruments as either assets or liabilities in the statements of financial position and it measures those instruments at fair value. However, accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative instrument, such as a currency hedging instrument, depends on the intended use of the derivative instrument and the resulting designation. For derivative instruments that are not designated as cash flow hedges, changes in fair value are recognized in our income statement without any reference to the change in value of the related budgeted expenditures. These differences could result in fluctuations in ourBezeq’s quarterly results of operations.

3

 

Negative developments in, or the general weakness of, Israel’s economy, in particular increasing levels of unemployment, may have a direct negative impact on the spending patterns of retail consumers, both in terms of the products they subscribe for and usage levels. Because a substantial portionStability in the financial market and the strength of economies in countries around the Bezeq Group’s revenue is derived from residential subscribers who may be impacted by these conditions, such conditions may make it more difficult for the Bezeq Groupworld, have recently been subjected to attract new subscribers, more likely that certain of its subscribers will downgrade or disconnect their services and make it more difficult to maintain ARPUs at existing levels. In addition, there can be no assurance that deterioration inhigh volatility. While the Israeli economy wouldhas displayed economic resilience, reflected in economic expansion, low levels of unemployment and inflation rates within government targets, the continued increase in of housing prices, global economic shocks and uncertainty in the political and defense arenas may cast doubt over a continuation of these trends. In the event the local economy is negatively impacted following external or internal events, Bezeq’s business results may be harmed as consequence of lower revenues (including revenues from affiliates) or due to an increase in finance costs.

Bezeq may face difficulties in obtaining some of the building and environmental permits required for the establishment and operation of its network sites, which could have an adverse effect on the coverage, quality and capacity of its network.

Bezeq is subject to the Israeli Non-Ionizing Radiation Law, which regulates the emission of electromagnetic radiation from broadcast facilities. While Bezeq is working to obtain permits to set up and operate its various broadcast installations, the difficulties it faces in this area, including difficulties stemming from the change in policy by relevant entities and amendments to statutes and standards, could have an adverse impact on the infrastructure of these installations and on the continuity of services using them, and as a result, on Bezeq's revenues from these services. Bezeq's third-party liability policy does not leadcurrently cover liability for electromagnetic radiation.

Frequent technological changes may negatively impact Bezeq’s operations and the value of its assets.

The communications sector is characterized by frequent technological changes and the shortening of the economic life of new technologies. The trend has created a need to invest significant resources in technology upgrades, has caused the lowering of barriers to entry into the sector by new competitors, increased depreciation rates, and in certain cases, resulted in the redundancy of technologies and networks owned by Bezeq (the cost of investment in which is still recorded on its balance sheets).

Bezeq’s operations are vulnerable to damage or interruption, which could expose it to material risks.

Bezeq provides services using various infrastructure systems that include, among others, exchanges, transmission, data communication and access systems, cables, computerized systems and others. If any part of Bezeq’s infrastructure becomes subject to a flood, fire, other natural disaster, terrorism, acts of war, a computer virus, a power loss, material bugs in software or other catastrophe or unauthorized access, its operations and customer relations could be materially adversely affected. In addition, disaster recovery, security and service continuity protection measures that Bezeq has made or may in the future undertake, and its monitoring of network performance, may be insufficient to prevent losses. In such event, Bezeq might incur liabilities or reputational damages.

Risks Relating to the Pelephone's Business

Competition from other providers has adversely affected Pelephone’s business and results of operations.

Competition in the cellular telephony industry has intensified since 2012. This has led to lower prices and higher customer churn rates, which in turn has affected the results of Pelephone. Pelephone expects competition to continue to increase amid the changing legislation in Israel and consolidation in the telecommunications industry that permits certain service providers to market a combination of fixed-line telephony, fixed-line broadband Internet infrastructure access, ISP and pay television services, or a “bundle”, for an aggregate price which is lower than the price of the individual products and services in the bundle. These competitive forces may create further downward pressure on prices, which may result in a decrease in the Pelephone’s average revenue per user, or ARPU, and increase churn rates. Furthermore, the costs of establishing, maintaining and operating a mobile telephony network per subscriber is expected to be higher for Pelephone if it will not be allowed to operate under some form of network sharing model.

Pelephone is subject to governmental control and regulation

The cellular industry in Israel is subject to legislation and standardization relating to issues such as the environment, increased competition, tariffs, product warranty and repair. Regulatory intervention in the industry may materially impact Pelephone's structure of competition and operating costs. Changes in the regulatory principles applicable to the cellular industry as a whole and to Pelephone in particular, could require Pelephone to make changes to its strategic plans and harm its ability to plan its business activities for the long term.

Pelephone’s operations are subject to market risks such as currency fluctuations.

Pelephone is exposed to exchange rate risks as most of its terminal equipment, accessories, spare parts and infrastructure equipment are purchased in US dollars. While its revenues are in NIS. Any erosion of the NIS against the US dollar may affect Pelephone's profitability if it is unable to adjust selling prices promptly.

4

Frequent technological changes may negatively impact Pelephone’s operations and finances.

The cellular market in Israel and worldwide is characterized by substantial capital investments in the deployment of infrastructure. The frequent technological changes in infrastructure and terminal equipment and the fierce competition in various market segments impose a heavy financial burden on the companies operating in the market, requiring them to update their infrastructure technology from time to time.

Pelephone’s results of operations are subject to credit risk associated with consumer credit transactions.

Pelephone’s sales of terminal equipment are mostly credit-based. Most of this credit, which is not covered by either insurance or sureties, is exposed to risk. It is noted that the credit is spread among a large number of customers defaulting on their contractsand Pelephone's collection mechanisms are efficient and competent. Negative developments in, or increasedthe general weakness of, Israel’s economy, in particular increasing levels of service disconnections.unemployment, may have a direct negative impact on consumer defaults. Therefore, a weak economy and negative economic developments may jeopardize the Bezeq Group’sPelephone’s growth targets and may have a material adverse effect on the Bezeq Group’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

9

The Bezeq Group could be subject to labor disruptions that interfere with its operations and adversely affect the Bezeq Group’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

The Bezeq Group could be subject to labor disputes and adverse employee relations which could disrupt its operations and adversely affect its business, financial condition and results of operations. A significant portion of its employees is represented by labor unions, and it is possible that such employees, and our other employees, could attempt to take collective action against companies in the Bezeq Group if they are unhappy with their employment conditions. Existing employment agreements with the employees and labor union agreements may not prevent a strike or work stoppage in the future. There can be no assurance that the Bezeq Group will not experience labor disputes and/or adverse employee relations in the future.

The Bezeq Group depends on hardware, software and other providers of outsourced services, who may discontinue their services or products, seek to charge prices that are not competitive or choose not to renew their contracts.

The Bezeq Group has important relationships with several suppliers of hardware, software and related services that are used to operate its businesses. In certain cases, substantial investments have been made in the equipment or software of a particular supplier, making it difficult to quickly change supply and maintenance relationships in the event that the initial supplier refuses to offer favorable prices or ceases to produce equipment or provide the support that the Bezeq Group requires. Further, in the event that hardware or software products or related services are defective, it may be difficult or impossible to enforce recourse claims against suppliers, especially if warranties included in contracts with suppliers have expired or are exceeded by those in the Bezeq Group companies’ contracts with their subscribers, in individual cases, or if the suppliers are insolvent, in whole or in part. In addition, there can be no assurances that the Bezeq Group will be able to obtain the hardware, software and services it needs for the operation of its business, in a timely manner, at competitive terms and in adequate amounts. The Bezeq Group’s ability to renew its existing contracts with suppliers of products or services, or enter into new contractual relationships upon the expiration of such contracts, either on commercially attractive terms, or at all, depends on a range of commercial and operational factors and events, which may be beyond its control. The occurrence of any of these risks could create technical problems, damage the Bezeq Group’s reputation, result in the loss of customer relationships and have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

The Bezeq GroupPotential health risks related to cellular network sites and cellular telecommunication devices could have a material adverse effect on Pelephone’s business, results of operations and financial condition.

Pelephone operates hundreds of broadcast facilities and sells electromagnetic radiation emitting terminal equipment. While Pelephone is taking measures to ensure that the levels of radiation emitted by its broadcast facilities and terminal equipment do not exceed the radiation levels permitted in the Ministry of Environmental Protection guidelines (the levels adopted are based on international standards), no assurance can be given that it will be able to do so in the future. If health risks are found to exist or if the broadcast sites or terminal equipment are found to emit radiation levels exceeding the permitted radiation standards, thereby constituting a health hazard, this may be subject to claims of intellectual property infringement, which could have an adverse effect due to reduced consumption of Pelephone’s services, difficulty in renting sites, compensation claims for physical and property damages in substantial amounts and attempts to exercise the deeds of indemnity deposited by Pelephone with the planning authorities with respect to applicable law. Pelephone’s third-party liability policies do not currently cover electromagnetic radiation and any exposure to such claims could have a material adverse impact on Pelephone’s business, results of operations and financial condition.

Pelephone may face difficulties in obtaining some of the building and environmental permits required for the establishment and operation of its businesses or operating results.cellular antennas.

 

The Bezeq GroupPelephone is subject to the Israeli Radiation Law. Establishing and operating cellular antennas require building permits from various planning and building committees, a process that involves, among other things, obtaining several approvals from State entities and local regulatory bodies. The inability to obtain and retain the necessary permits s may impact the quality of Pelephone’s existing network and the deployment of its new network.

Pelephone may be restricted in the conduct of its operations during periods of national emergency, which could negatively affect its business operations.

During periods of national emergency, the Minister of Communications and other governmental authorities may issue various instructions regarding the use of Pelephone’s network, including the use of the network by the Israeli security forces. In addition, the Israeli Equipment Registration and IDF Mobilization Law, 1987 permits the taking and use of engineering equipment and facilities by Israel’s Defense Forces. These actions could adversely affect Pelephone’s business operations.

Pelephone’s systems and operations are vulnerable to damage or interruption, which could expose it to material risk of intellectual property rights claims against it. The Bezeq Grouploss or litigation.

Pelephone provides services using various infrastructure systems and is spread throughout the country through core network sites, antenna sites and other systems. Pelephone’s business is totally dependent upon these systems. If any part of Pelephone’s infrastructure becomes subject to a flood, fire, other natural disaster, terrorism, acts of war, a computer virus, a power loss, material bugs in software or other catastrophe or unauthorized access, its operations and customer relations could be materially adversely affected. In addition, disaster recovery, security and service continuity protection measures that Pelephone has, in the past andor may in the future be subject to claimsundertake, and its monitoring of infringement or misappropriation of other parties’ proprietary rights. In addition to claims relating to broadcasts on channels DBS owns, itnetwork performance, may be subjectinsufficient to intellectual property infringement claims with respect to programs broadcast on foreign channels that it carries. Successful challenges to DBS’s rights to intellectual property could require DBS to enter into royalty or licensing agreements on unfavorable terms, incur substantial monetary liability or be enjoined preliminarily or permanently from further use of the intellectual property in question. This could require a change in business practices and limit the ability to provide customers with the content that they expect. If DBS is required to take any of these actions, it could have an adverse impact on its businesses or operating results.

Even if the claims of intellectual property infringement are without merit, defending against the claims can be time-consuming and costly and divert management’s attention and resources away from its businesses. Israeli law relating to intellectual property contains provisions allowing the owner of an intellectual property right to apply to Israeli courts to grant various enforcement measures and other remedies,prevent losses. In such as temporary and permanent injunctive relief and a right to confiscate infringing goods and damages. If any of these claims succeed, the Bezeq Group may be forced to pay damages or may be required to obtain licenses for the infringing product or service and mayevent, Pelephone might incur liabilities or reputational damages as a result. If the Bezeq Group cannot obtain all necessary licenses on commercially reasonable terms, it may be forced to stop using or selling the products and services, which could adversely affect its ability to provide certain services and products.damages.

 

BarriersPelephone is subject to entrylegal proceedings, which could result in the Israeli domestic fixed-line communications segment have lessened considerably in recent years.its being ordered to pay significant sums.

 

OperatingPelephone is a party to legal proceedings, including class actions, which may result in the Israeli domestic fixed-line communications segment requires receiptit being liable for material amounts that cannot presently be estimated and no provision has been made in Pelephone’s financial statements for these proceedings. In addition, Pelephone’s insurance policies are limited to defined cover limits and to certain causes of the appropriate domestic fixed-line licenses. Traditionally, the main barrier to entry in this segment arose from the needaction, and might not cover claims for heavy investment in technological infrastructure and in surrounding systems, which were necessary to achieve economiescertain types of scale, and from high costs involving the establishment of marketing, sales, collection and customer support systems and the building of a brand.damages. In recent years, these traditional barriers to entry into the Bezeq Group’s segments of operationclass actions against large commercial companies have lessened considerably as abecome more numerous and severe. By their very nature, class actions may result of the following factors: technological improvements, lower infrastructure and equipment prices, easing of regulations applying to new competitors and the mandatory obligation to allow Bezeq’s competitors to use the fixed-line infrastructures and services of Bezeq and HOT.in significant judgments or settlements.

 

 105 

 

 

Pelephone could be subject to labor disruptions.

Pelephone has a collective agreement with the New General Federation of Workers and with the employees' committee which applies to most of its employees. Implementation of the collective agreement may reduce managerial flexibility and incur additional costs for Pelephone. Pelephone’s implementation of human resources and organization plans, including retirement and restructuring plans, involves coordination with the New General Federation of Workers and with the employees' committee. The implementation processes of such plans may cause unrest in labor relations and be damaging to Pelephone’s ongoing activities.

Pelephone’s frequencies are exposed to interference which could impair the service quality of its services.

Under its cellular license and the Wireless Telegraph Ordinance, Pelephone has rights of use of frequencies in the 850 MHz, which and could impair the service quality of its networks. The factors that could cause interference include the fact that the 850 MHz frequency is also used for terrestrial television broadcasts by television stations in the Middle East, causing interference in Pelephone’s 850 MHz UMTS/HSPA network. In August 2013, IBC, a telecommunications joint ventureaddition, the Jordanian networks also use the same 2100 MHZ frequency range that Pelephone uses and in view of the limited cooperation between the government-owned IECoperators in Jordan and Pelephone, this could have an adverse effect on service quality. The Ministry of Communications is currently preparing to implement the first giga frequency program that could impact the frequency ranges allocated to Pelephone.

Risks Relating to the DBS's Business

Competition from other providers and content piracy has adversely affected DBS’s business and results of operations.

Competition in the broadcast sector with HOT and more recently with Cellcom, requires DBS to constantly invest in attracting and retaining customers, and dealing with high subscriber churn rates between the companies. Competition also increased due to the increasing use of pirated broadcasts. The broadcasting sector is also exposed to piracy by viewers in viewing broadcasts without paying subscription fees and is exposed to unlicensed public access to content to which the broadcast providers have rights. These competitive forces may create downward pressure on prices, which may result in a decrease in the DBS’s ARPU and increase churn rates.

DBS’s operations are subject to market risks such as currency fluctuations, economic weakness and the security situation in Israel.

A material part of DBS's expenses and investments are linked to fluctuations in the exchange rate of the US dollar (particularly content, satellite segments, purchase of decoders and additional logistics equipment). Therefore, sharp fluctuations in the exchange rate will have an effect on DBS's business results. In addition, the loans taken out by DBS are linked to the consumer price index and, therefore, sharp rises in inflation rates could have a material effect on DBS’s business results. An economic recession, increase in unemployment rates and a consortiumdecrease in disposable income might bring about a decrease in the number of non-government companies that was selected byDBS’ subscribers, a decrease in DBS’ revenues and harm to its business results. In addition, an ongoing unstable security situation in large areas of Israel, which disrupts the IEC inday-to-day lives of the residents, could have an adverse effect on DBS's business results.

DBS is subject to governmental control and regulation

DBS provides multi-channel television broadcasts under a tender procedure, was granted a generalbroadcast license forand other licenses. Violation of the provisionprovisions of telecommunications infrastructure services (including data services, digital transmissionsthe licenses and VPN) via fiber optic networks to telecommunication services providers. Accordingof the law under which the licenses are issued could, subject to the license IBC will enter into an agreement with the IEC to use the IEC’s fiber optic network in Israel to provide such wholesale products to telecommunication services providers. If IBC is successful, it would compete with Bezeq and HOTconditions, result in the wholesale market, as well as providing such services directly to large business customers. IBC has begun operating in several cities. Unlikerevocation, amendment or suspension of the other communications groups, Bezeq Group is at present, subject to the stricter limitations.

The regulation of competition in VoB-based telephony, which enables telephony services to be provided based on a broadband Internet infrastructure of another operator without need for an independent fixed-line infrastructure (and competition based on dividing the network into sectionslicenses and wholesale sale of services), significantly reduces the size of investment required from those competing with Bezeq, thereby lowering the barriers to entry in the fixed-line segment.

If DBS is unable to obtain attractive programming on satisfactory terms for its pay television services, the demand for these services could be reduced, which couldconsequently adversely affect its revenue and profitability.

The success of DBS’s services depends on access to an attractive selection of television programming from content providers. The ability to provide movie, sports, popular series and other programming, including VOD content, is a major factor that attracts subscribers to pay television services, especially premium services. If DBS was unable to obtain high-quality content, it could limit DBS’s ability to incentivize customerscontinue operating. DBS’s operations and broadcasts are subject to migrateobligations and restrictions set out in legislation and to a system of licensing, oversight and approvals from lower priced packages to higher tier programming, which would inhibit its ability to execute its business strategy. Furthermore, there canvarious regulatory bodies. Consequently, DBS may be no assurance that DBS will continue to be able to obtain an attractive selection of television programming, obtain exclusive rights to certain programming, or that the local content that DBS provides will continue to be successful. Any or all ofaffected and restricted by policy considerations dictated by these factors could result in reduced demand for,entities and lower revenueby their decisions and profitability from, DBS’s satellite broadcast services.

Adverse decisions of tax authorities or changes in tax treaties, laws, rules or interpretationscommunications legislation. Regulatory changes could impact DBS operations and could have a material adverse effect on its financial results. Likewise, the Bezeq Group’s resultsentry of content providers transmitting video content without applicable regulation of their operations including licensing may significantly affect DBS's financial results. As a provider of public services, DBS operations are also subject to consumer protection regulations.

Technological developments and cash flow.improvements may negatively affect DBS and its operations.

 

The tax lawsdevelopment of new technologies may render existing technology inferior, forcing DBS to invest large sums to retain its competitive edge. Such technological advances and regulationsdevelopments may also facilitate increased accessibility to video content, allowing other providers to offer content viewing services without the need for heavy investment that may make it difficult for DBS to recruit new subscribers, retain existing subscribers and offer its services. In order to compete effectively, DBS may be required to invest large amounts. Alternative multi-channel broadcasting infrastructures, such as DTT, a terrestrial implementation of digital television technology using an aerial to broadcast to a conventional television antenna (or aerial) instead of a satellite dish or cable television connections, and its expansion, may have an adverse impact on the financial results of DBS.

6

The failure to comply with the covenants in DBS’s credit facilities could lead to acceleration of the underlying debt under certain circumstances and such covenants may limit DBS’s financial and operational flexibility.

DBS’s outstanding debt is subject to immediate repayment in the event of non-compliance with its loan agreements. DBS’s failure to comply with the provisions of its financing agreements may, under certain circumstances, permit the lenders to call the loans provided to DBS for immediate repayment and acquire the shares of DBS deposited as security to some of the lenders. - DBS is required to maintain sufficient cash flow from its operations in order to be in compliance with certain of its debt covenants. These covenants could restrict DBS’s ability to achieve its business objectives, and therefore, could have an adverse effect on its financial condition. The absence of a sufficient cash flow may negatively impact DBS’s ability to increase its rate of penetration of advanced services (such as PVR and HDPVR decoders) and t to face the competitive threats arising from technological developments and consumption patterns in the market.

DBS is subject to restrictions on intercompany relations with Bezeq and its other subsidiaries, which harms its ability to compete and adversely affects its business.

DBS is restricted in entering into joint ventures with Bezeq with respect to offering communications service bundles. Both HOT and Cellcom, DBS’s principal competitors, are able to provide service bundles to their customers, which provide them with a significant advantage. DBS’s inability to ability to offer joint service bundles to customers has had a material impact on its business and competitive ability.

There are significant risks associated with providing satellite-based broadcasting.

DBS broadcasts its multi-channel pay television via space segments on the Amos 2 and Amos 3 satellites stationed at identical points in space. Malfunction of one of the satellites, damage to one of them or the unavailability of space segments on any of the satellites (including the unavailability of a new satellite scheduled to replace a satellite that ceased to broadcast) could disrupt and materially reduce the volume of DBS broadcasts, unless an alternative is promptly found to replace unavailable space segments. While DBS has attempted to provide for redundancy and has entered into a partial backup mechanism in its agreement with Spacecom, it may not be successful in fully replacing its broadcast capabilities and would likely not be able to provide all the channels it now offers. DBS is not insured against loss of revenues caused by satellite malfunction.

DBS is dependent on Spacecom, as the exclusive holder of the rights and the sole provider of space segments used by DBS.

DBS is dependent on Spacecom Communications Ltd., or Spacecom, a company controlled by our controlling shareholder, as the exclusive holder of the rights and the sole provider of space segments used by DBS in providing satellite broadcast.Spacecom is, and is also responsible for operating the space segments.

DBS is dependent on several third-party vendors and a disruption in those services could adversely affect its business.

DBS is dependent on certain providers of software, equipment, content and services, including broadcast encryption services in providing its satellite TV services. Failure to receive the products and services, or the failure to retain broadcast licenses and obtain access to new content from content providers services would negatively impact DBS’s its business and competitive position.

DBS depends on its broadcast centers and central computing center in Israel and is susceptible to any event that could adversely affect their condition.

Damage to a broadcast center’s operations may significantly impair DBS’s ability to continue its satellite TV broadcasts. DBS operates broadcast centers in Kfar Saba and Re’em Junction in order reduce the risks involved if one of its centers sustains damage and improves the survivability of some of its broadcast capabilities. In the event of damage to one of the broadcast centers, DBS will be able to continue broadcasting only a portion of its channels from the other broadcasting center. This is more significant in the event of damage to the Kfar Saba center, which is the only center with the capacity to broadcast certain of DBS’s key channels. Both of the broadcast centers have identical encryption systems and therefore backup is also available for the encryption system in the event of damage to one of the broadcast centers. A significant malfunction in DBS's central computer systems would also severely impact its operational capability. While DBS has a remote backup site designed to be activated and provide partial computer services within a few hours in the event of malfunction, it will be extremely difficult for DBS to operate efficiently without the operation of the central computer systems. Damage to DBS's logistics center could also lead to a disruption of its operations.

7

DBS’s technology is inferior to that of its principal competitor.

DBS’s technology is inferior to that of HOT, its principal competitor. This technical inferiority prevents DBS from providing telephony and Internet services, and various interactive services, including VOD, via its infrastructure; and therefore DBS is dependent on third parties in order to provide such services

DBS is dependent on third-party encryption systems.

DBS encrypts the broadcasts it transmits via satellite and utilizes encoded smart cards that are installed in the decoders in subscribers’ homes. Defects in the encryption system or its enforcement or a breach thereof could make it possible for unauthorized persons to view broadcasts without payment to DBS, causing a reduction in revenues and a breach of the agreements between DBS and its content suppliers. A malfunction of the encryption system or its enforcement could have a material adverse impact on DBS’s operations and financial results.

DBS’s frequencies are not exclusive, and are subject to interference, which could impair the service quality of its services.

The spectrum of frequencies used by DBS to transmit its broadcasts from the broadcast satellites to the satellite dishes installed in subscribers’ homes is allocated in accordance with the license from the Ministry of Communications and is defined as a frequency spectrum with a secondary allocation. An Israeli entity is allowed to make authorized primary use the frequency spectrum used by DBS. If the owner of the primary allocation uses the frequency spectrum, this may cause an adverse impact on the quality and/or availability of DBS broadcasts to its subscribers, which may adversely affect the financial results of DBS. To the best of DBS's knowledge, the primary allocation holder has not made use of such frequencies in a manner that has caused any real or lengthy disruptions to DBS’s broadcasts. As DBS’s broadcasts are wireless transmissions from broadcast centers to broadcast satellites and from them to the receiver dishes in subscriber homes, the broadcast of wireless signals in the same frequency spectrum, whether or not they originate in Israel, and extreme weather conditions of heavy rain, hail or snow could cause disruptions to the quality and/or availability of the broadcasts provided by DBS to its subscribers. Such disruptions may have an adverse effect on DBS’s financial results.

DBS could be subject to changelabor disruptions.

DBS is party to a collective agreement with the New General Federation of Workers and therethe Workers Committee. Implementation of the collective agreement may reduce managerial flexibility and incur additional costs for DBS. DBS’s implementation of human resources and organization plans, including retirement and restructuring plans, involves coordination with the New General Federation of Workers and with the employees' committee. The implementation processes of such plans may cause unrest in labor relations and be damaging to Pelephone’s ongoing activities.

DBS is subject to legal proceedings.

DBS is a party to legal proceedings, including class actions, which may result in it being liable for material amounts that cannot presently be estimated and no provision has been made in its financial statements for these proceedings. In addition, DBS’s insurance policies are limited to defined cover limits and to certain causes of action, and might not cover claims for certain types of damages. In recent years, class actions against large commercial companies have become more numerous and severe. By their very nature, class actions may result in significant judgments or settlements.

Risks Relating to the Bezeq International's Business

Bezeq International's operations are subject to currency fluctuations.

The primary currency in which Bezeq International operates is the NIS. While the majority of Bezeq International's revenues are derived from customers in Israel, Bezeq International uses services from providers worldwide and pays them for these services in foreign currency, primarily in US dollars. Changes in the exchange rates of the currencies in which Bezeq International operates against the NIS exposes it to rate differentials on the gap generated, which could adversely affect its profitability by increasing financing expenses, as well as its cash flows. To protect itself against currency exposure, for specific material transactions, Bezeq International engages in hedging transactions and purchases other financial instruments.

Technological developments and improvements may negatively affect Bezeq International's operations.

Bezeq International's operations are characterized by frequent technological developments. The development of technologies constituting attractive alternatives to some of Bezeq International's products, such as Skype as an alternative to long-distance calling, is likely to have a materially adverse effect on its operations. Furthermore, technological developments require frequent investment in infrastructure which could impact its financial condition.

8

Bezeq International is subject to governmental control and regulation

Bezeq International operations are subject to obligations and restrictions set out in legislation and to a system of licensing and oversight. Consequently, Bezeq International may be affected and restricted by policy considerations dictated by its regulators and by their decisions and changes in interpretationcommunications legislation. Regulatory changes could impact Bezeq International operations and enforcement of tax law. As a result, we and the Bezeq Group may face increases in taxes payable if tax rates increase, or if tax laws and regulations are modified by the competent authorities in an adverse manner. We regularly assess the likelihood of such outcomes and have established tax provisions which represent management’s best estimate of the potential assessments. The Israeli Tax Authority may challenge certain positions that we and the Bezeq Group have adopted in the past or that we and the Bezeq Group may adopt in the future. The resolution of any of these tax matters could differ from the amount we or Bezeq have reserved, which could have a material adverse effect on our cash flows, business,its financial condition and results of operations.results.

 

Our success depends on the continued service of certain key executives and personnel.Bezeq International is subject to legal proceedings, which could result in its being ordered to pay significant sums.

 

The Bezeq Group’s key executivesInternational is a party to legal proceedings, including class actions, which may result in it being liable for material amounts. Bezeq International one’s insurance policies are limited to defined cover limits and employees possess substantial knowledgeto certain causes of action, and might not cover claims for certain types of damages. In recent years, class actions against large commercial companies have become more numerous and severe. By their very nature, class actions may result in significant judgments or settlements.

Bezeq International’s systems and operations are vulnerable to damage or interruption, which could expose it to material risk of loss or litigation.

Bezeq International provides services using various infrastructure systems. If any part of Bezeq International’s infrastructure becomes subject to a flood, fire, other natural disaster, terrorism, acts of war, a computer virus, a power loss, material bugs in software or other catastrophe or unauthorized access, its operations and customer relations could be materially adversely affected. In addition, disaster recovery, security and service continuity protection measures that Bezeq International has, or may in the future undertake, and its monitoring of network performance, may be insufficient to prevent losses. In such event, Bezeq International might incur liabilities or reputational damages.

Bezeq International could be subject to labor disruptions.

Bezeq International has a collective agreement with the New General Federation of Workers and with the employees' committee which applies to most of its businessemployees. Implementation of the collective agreement may reduce managerial flexibility and operations. We cannot assure you thatincur additional costs for Bezeq International. Bezeq International’s implementation of human resources and organization plans, including retirement and restructuring plans, involves coordination with the New General Federation of Workers and with the employees' committee. The implementation processes of such plans may cause unrest in labor relations and be damaging to Bezeq Group will be successful in retaining their services or that the Bezeq Group would be successful in hiring and training suitable replacements without undue costs or delays. As a result, the loss of any of these key executives and employees could cause significant disruptions in the Bezeq Group’s business operations, which could materially adversely affect our results of operations.International s ongoing activities.

 

Risks Related to Our Company

 

We have a substantial amount of existing debt, which could restrict our financing and operating flexibility and have other adverse consequences; our ability to repay our debt may be affected by Bezeq’s dividend distribution policy and the amount of dividends we receive from Bezeq.

 

We have a substantial amount of indebtedness. As of April 18, 2016,26, 2017, we had approximately NIS 3.42.6 billion (approximately $0.9 billion)$677 million) of debt. Our significant level of debt could have important consequences, including, but not limited to, the following:

 

making it more difficult for us to service our debt obligations and liabilities;

 

making us vulnerable to, and reducing our flexibility to respond to, general adverse economic and industry conditions;

 

 11

requiring that a substantial portion of our cash flows from operations be dedicated to servicing debt, thereby reducing the funds available to us to fund working capital, or other general corporate purposes;

 

impeding our ability to obtain additional debt or equity financing and increasing the cost of any such borrowing, particularly due to the financial and other restrictive covenants contained in the agreements governing our debt; and

 

adversely affecting public perception of us.

 

Our credit ratings impact the cost and availability of future borrowings and, accordingly, our cost of capital. Our ratings at any time will reflect each rating organization’s then opinion of our financial strength, operating performance and ability to meet our debt obligationsIn February 2016, Midroog raised the local rating of our Series B Debentures from A1.il to Aa3.il, while maintaining a stable outlook. In September 2016, Midroog approved an Aa3.il Rating for our new Series C Debentures.Any reductions in our credit ratings will limit our ability to borrow at interest rates consistent with the interest rates that were available to us in the past. If our credit ratings are downgraded or put on watch for a potential downgrade, we may not be able to sell additional debt securities or borrow money in the amounts, at the times or interest rates or upon the more favorable terms and conditions that might be available if our current credit ratings are maintained.See Item 5B. “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects - Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

 

The agreements and instruments governing our debt contain restrictions and limitations that could adversely affect our ability to operate our business.

The terms of the indentures governing our 7⅜% Senior Secured Notes and our Series B Debentures contain a number of significant covenants or other provisions that could adversely affect our ability to operate our business. These covenants restrict our ability to, among other things:

incur or guarantee additional indebtedness and issue certain preferred stock;

use the proceeds of any dividends received from the Bezeq Group and make certain restricted payments and investments;

create or incur certain liens;

impose restrictions on the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends or other payments to us;

transfer or sell ownership interests in the Bezeq Group;

merge or consolidate with other entities;

impair the security interest for the benefit of holders of the Notes; and

enter into transactions with affiliates.

All of these limitations will be subject to significant exceptions and qualifications, including the ability to pay dividends, make investments or to make significant prepayments of shareholder debt. However, these covenants could limit our ability to finance our future operations and our ability to pursue business opportunities and activities that may be in our interest. In addition, our ability to comply with these restrictions may be affected by events beyond our control. In addition to limiting our flexibility in operating our business, the breach of any covenants or obligations under the agreements and instruments governing our debt will result in a default under the applicable debt agreement or instrument and could trigger acceleration of the related debt, which in turn could trigger defaults under other agreements governing our debt. If we are unable to repay those amounts, our creditors could proceed against any collateral granted to them to secure repayment of those amounts. As a result, a default under any of the agreements governing our debt could materially adversely affect our growth, financial condition and results of operations.

Our operating results are subject to material risks such as fluctuations in the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the NIS, fluctuations in the Israeli consumer price index and in interest rates.

We report our financial results in NIS. Bezeq receives payments in NIS for most of its sales. As a result, fluctuations in rates of exchange between NIS and the U.S. dollar may affect our operating results and financial condition. As a result of our issuance of 7⅜% Senior Secured Notes in February 2014, we incurred $800 million of U.S. denominated debt that is subject to exchange rate fluctuations. Although we have entered into certain hedging arrangements to protect against certain foreign currency exchange rate risks associated with the Notes, such hedging activities may be ineffective or may not offset more than a portion of the adverse financial impact resulting from foreign currency variations. Gains or losses associated with hedging activities also may negatively impact operating results. In addition, if one (or more) of our counterparties falls into bankruptcy, claims we have under any such hedging arrangements may become worthless. In addition, in the event that we refinance our debt or otherwise terminate hedging agreements, we may be required to make termination payments, which would result in a loss.

 129 

 

 

We, Internet Gold and other members of the Eurocom Group are subject to the Control Permit for holding the controlling interest in Bezeq. Failure to comply with this permit or other regulatory provisions relating to the control of Bezeq may result in the revocation of the Control Permit and our rights with respect to our Bezeq interest would be adversely impacted, which would materially and adversely affect our business and financial position.

 

Pursuant to the Communications Order, we were required to obtain the prior written consent of the Ministers in order to obtain a permit to acquire the controlling interest in Bezeq. Under the Communications Order, no person may hold, directly or indirectly, “significant influence” over Bezeq or 5% or more of any particular class of Means of Control in Bezeq, nor may any person, together with any other person, appoint, elect or dismiss the general manager of Bezeq or cause the election, appointment or dismissal of any director of Bezeq, without the prior written consent of the Ministers. Subject to certain exceptions, prior written approval of the Ministers is also required to increase the holdings or other rights in excess of those determined in the initial approval, including by means of an agreement (including a voting agreement). No person may transfer control, “significant influence” or Means of Control in Bezeq to another, if, as a result of the transfer, the holdings of the transferee would require approval pursuant to the Israeli Communications Law or Communications Order and the transferor is aware that the transferee is not in possession of the requisite approval. For the foregoing purposes, “significant influence” means the ability to significantly influence the activity of a corporation, whether alone or together with or through others, directly or indirectly, other than as a result of holding Means of Control in that corporation or in another corporation, and including the ability derived from the corporation’s articles of association, a written, oral or other kind of agreement, or from any other source. In this context, the right to appoint an officer or holding 25% of our Means of Control is presumed to confer significant influence. “Means of Control” means the right to vote at a general meeting of the company, appoint a director or general manager of the company, or to participate in the profits of the company or a share of the remaining assets of the company after payment of its debts upon liquidation.

 

The Control Permit includes several conditions, including, among others, the requirement that SP2 be controlled exclusively by the other parties to the Control Permit and that the parties to the Control Permit hold not less than 30% of any type of Means of Control of Bezeq and SP2. In February 2011, the Ministers permitted such percentage to decrease to 29% for a period of six months commencing from the date such holdings fall below 30%, in the event of dilution resulting from the exercise of options by Bezeq employees.

 

Despite the 30% rule, according to Article 3(a3) of the Communications Order, which is included as part of the Control Permit, the parties may hold less than 30% under certain circumstances, including the requirement that the parties control Bezeq and maintain at least a 25% ownership interest in Bezeq.

 

In addition, the Control Permit requires that 19% of the issued share capital of SP2 be held at all times by an “Israeli Party,” as defined in the Communications Order. The Control Permit also includes certain notice requirements regarding changes in the composition of the board of directors and certain holdings in us and Internet Gold. If we, Internet Gold or any other member of the Eurocom Group subject to the Control Permit fails to comply with the terms of the Control Permit or with other regulatory provisions relating to the control of Bezeq, such permit could be revoked and our rights with respect to our Bezeq interest would be adversely impacted, which would have a material adverse effect on our business and financial position.

 

Any event in which a receiver is appointed with respect to our holdings in SP2 or SP2’s holdings in Bezeq will constitute grounds for the cancellation of the Control Permit. In addition, in the event that the Ministers determine that a material change in the details included in the application for the Control Permit has occurred or the members to the Control Permit failed to provide requisite notifications in accordance with the Control Permit, and there is a real concern that the essential service provided by Bezeq will be harmed, the Ministers may cancel the Control Permit or set conditions for its continuation pursuant to the provisions of the Israeli Communications Law. In the event that the Control Permit is cancelled and an application to reissue another control permit is denied, our holdings in Bezeq must be liquidated within 15 to 60 days (depending on the cause for such cancellation) pursuant to the Communications Order.

 

10

In accordance with the Concentration Law, if either we or Internet Gold are unable to delist our ordinary shares from the TASE and redeem any publicly held debt or go private prior to December 10, 2019, we will not be permitted to control Bezeq after such date.

 

Under the recently enacted Concentration Law, a second-tier company (i.e., a company with publicly held debt or equity securities that is subject to reporting obligations under the Israeli Securities Law and controlled by a first-tier company), is prohibited from controlling another tier company. In the case of existing companies, a second-tier company is entitled to continue to control another tier company that it controlled on the publication date of the Concentration Law for a period of six years from the date of publication of the Concentration Law, i.e., until December 10, 2019. In the event that a second-tier company controls another tier company contrary to the provisions of the Concentration Law, a district court may appoint a trustee, who will be awarded the Means of Control in such tier company for the purpose of selling such Means of Control. The trustee shall act pursuant to the orders of such court with respect to the Means of Control. Such court may, instead of appointing a trustee and under certain circumstances, order that the Means of Control held by the controlling shareholder shall not provide any rights whatsoever. Until the appointment of a trustee by a district court, the Means of Control held by a tier company that illegally controls another tier company shall not grant any voting rights at the illegally held tier company’s shareholder meetings. The Concentration Law sets forth certain mechanisms intended to enable a tier company to make various arrangements for the repurchase of its publicly-held shares and the early redemption of publicly-held debt in order to comply with the provisions of the law.

13

 

Our company is deemed to be a second-tier company under the Concentration Law and Bezeq is deemed to be a third-tier company under the Concentration Law. Accordingly, if either Internet Gold or we are unable to redeem any publicly held debt and delist our ordinary shares from the TASE (which would require 90-days’ prior notice to the TASE) or go private prior to December 10, 2019, we will not be permitted to control Bezeq after such date and our holdings in Bezeq may be transferred to a trustee for the purpose of selling such holdings. Furthermore, if a trustee is appointed, he may motion a district court to order the cancellation of distributions made by Bezeq prior to his appointment if they are deemed to not be in Bezeq’s interest.

 

If we do not maintain control of Bezeq, we may be deemed to be an “investment company” under the Investment Company Act of 1940, which could materially and adversely affect our business.

 

Section 3(a)(1)(A) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, or the Investment Company Act, defines an investment company as any issuer that is, holds itself out as being, or proposes to be, primarily engaged in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities and Section 3(a)(1)(C) of the Investment Company Act defines an investment company as any issuer that is engaged or proposes to engage in the business of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding or trading in securities and owns or proposes to acquire “investment securities” (within the meaning of the Investment Company Act) having a value exceeding 40% of the value of the issuer’s total assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis. However, an issuer will be deemed not to be an investment company if no more than 45% of the value of such issuer’s total assets (exclusive of government securities and cash items) consists of, and no more than 45% of such issuer’s net income after taxes (for the last four fiscal quarters combined) is derived from, securities other than, among other things, securities issued by companies which are controlled primarily by such issuer. Primary control is presumed if the issuer owns over 25% of the controlled company’s voting securities and the issuer has control greater than that of any other person. Accordingly, so long as we maintain control of Bezeq, we will not be deemed an investment company.

 

If we were to no longer maintain the control of Bezeq, we could, among other things, be required either (i) to change substantially the manner in which we conduct our operations to avoid being subject to the Investment Company Act or (ii) to register as an investment company. An investment company that is organized under the laws of a foreign country may not register as an investment company, or publicly offer its securities through interstate commerce in the United States, unless the company applies to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC for an order permitting the company to register under the Investment Company Act, and to make a public offering in the United States. The SEC may issue an order granting the application if it finds that, by reason of special circumstances or arrangements, it is both legally and practically feasible effectively to enforce the provisions of the Investment Company Act against the issuer, and further finds that granting the application is otherwise consistent with the public interest and the protection of investors.

 

If we were required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act, we would become subject to substantial regulation with respect to our capital structure (including our ability to use leverage), management, operations, transactions with certain affiliates, reporting, record keeping, voting, proxy and disclosure requirements, and meeting these requirements would be costly, if at all possible.

 

Our success depends on the continued service of certain key executives and personnel of Bezeq and the management of our company.

The Bezeq Group’s key executives and employees possess substantial knowledge of its business and operations. We cannot assure you that the Bezeq Group will be successful in retaining their services or that the Bezeq Group would be successful in hiring and training suitable replacements without undue costs or delays. As a result, the loss of any of these key executives and employees could cause significant disruptions in the Bezeq Group’s business operations, which could materially adversely affect our results of operations. Similarly, our management has been instrumental in our success and loss of any key members of our management could materially adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

11

We may fail to maintain effective internal control over our financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which could have an adverse effect on our financial results and the market price of our ordinary shares.

 

Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires any company subject to the reporting requirements of the U.S. securities laws to do a comprehensive evaluation of its and its combined subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting. To comply with this statute, we are required to document and test our internal control over financial reporting and our management is required to assess and issue a report concerning our internal control over financial reporting. The rules governing the standards that must be met for management to assess our internal control over financial reporting are relatively complex and require significant documentation, testing and possible remediation to meet the detailed standards under the rules.

Failure to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting could result in investigation or sanctions by regulatory authorities and could have a material adverse effect on our operating results, investor confidence in our reported financial information and the market price of our ordinary shares.

14

 

Risks Related to Our Relationship with Internet Gold and Eurocom Communications Ltd.

 

Because Internet Gold and Eurocom Communications control a majority of our ordinary shares, investors will not be able to affect the outcome of shareholder votes that require a simple majority.

 

Internet Gold owned approximately 64.78 % of our outstanding ordinary shares as ofApril 1826, 2016.2017. For as long as Internet Gold has a controlling interest in our company, it, Mr. Shaul Elovitch, the chairman of our board of directors and the chairman of the board of directors of Internet Gold and its parent, Eurocom Communications, and the controlling shareholder of Eurocom Communications, will have the ability to exercise a controlling influence over our business and affairs, including any determinations with respect to potential mergers or other business combinations involving us, our acquisition or disposition of assets, our incurrence of indebtedness, our issuance of any additional ordinary shares or other equity securities, our repurchase or redemption of ordinary shares and our payment of dividends. Similarly, as long as Eurocom Communications has a controlling interest in Internet Gold, our corporate parent, Eurocom Communications and Mr. Elovitch will have the power to determine or significantly influence the outcome of matters submitted to a vote of our shareholders that require a simple majority, including the power to elect all of the members of our board of directors (except external directors, within the meaning of Israeli law). Because the interests of Internet Gold and Mr. Elovitch may differ from the interests of our other shareholders, actions taken by Internet Gold with respect to us may not be favorable to our other shareholders.

 

Conflicts of interest may arise between Internet Gold, Eurocom Communications, other companies within the Eurocom Group and us that could be resolved in a manner unfavorable to us and result in reduced revenues and income.

 

Conflicts of interest may arise between Internet Gold, Eurocom Communications and us in a number of areas relating to our past and ongoing relationships. Areas in which conflicts of interest between Internet Gold, Eurocom Communications and us could arise include, but are not limited to, the following:

 

Cross officerships, directorships and share ownership.A few of our directors and officers also serve or are employed by Internet Gold and/or Eurocom Communications. The cross officerships and directorships as well as the ownership interests of our directors and officers in the ordinary shares of Internet Gold or Eurocom Communications could create, or appear to create, conflicts of interest when directors and executive officers are faced with decisions that could have different implications for the different companies; and

 

Intercompany transactions.From time to time, Internet Gold, Eurocom Communications or other companies within the Eurocom Group may enter into transactions with us or our subsidiaries or other affiliates. Although the terms of any such transactions will be established based upon negotiations between employees of such companies and us and, when appropriate, subject to the approval of our independent directors or a committee of disinterested directors and in some instances a vote of shareholders, the terms of any such transactions may not be as favorable to us or our subsidiaries or affiliates as may otherwise be obtained in arm’s-length negotiations with unaffiliated third parties.

 

Risks Related to Our Ordinary Shares

 

Our share price has been volatile and may decrease in the future.

 

The market price of our ordinary shares has been subject to significant price movements and could be subject to wide fluctuations in the future in response to factors such as the following, some of which are beyond our control:

 

Quarterly variations in our operating results;

 

Global economic conditions;

 

12

Price movements in the market price of Bezeq’s ordinary shares;

 

Operating results that vary from the expectations of securities analysts and investors;

 

Changes in expectations as to our future financial performance, including financial estimates by securities analysts and investors;

 

Regulatory changes that impact pricing of services and competition in Bezeq’s markets;

 

Changes in market valuations of other communications companies;

 

Announcements of technological innovations or new services by Bezeq or its competitors;

 

Announcements by Bezeq or its competitors of significant contracts, acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments;

 

Changes in the status of Bezeq’s intellectual property rights;

 

Announcements by third parties of significant claims or proceedings against us or Bezeq;

 

Additions or departures of key personnel;

 

Future sales of our ordinary shares; and

 

Stock market price and volume fluctuations.

15

 

Domestic and international stock markets often experience extreme price and volume fluctuations. Market fluctuations, as well as general political and economic conditions, such as a recession or interest rate or currency rate fluctuations or political events or hostilities in or surrounding Israel, could adversely affect the market price of our ordinary shares.

 

We may be classified as a passive foreign investment company, which would subject our U.S. investors to adverse tax rules.

 

For U.S. federal income tax purposes, we may be classified as a passive foreign investment company, or PFIC, for any taxable year in which either: (i) 75% or more of our gross income is passive income or (ii) at least 50% of the average quarterly value of our assets for the taxable year produce or are held for the production of passive income. Based on our current and projected income, assets and activities, we believe that we are not currently a PFIC, but there can be no assurance that we will not be classified as such in the future.

 

If we were classified as a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes, complex rules would apply to U.S. investors owning our ordinary shares. Such U.S. investors could suffer adverse U.S. tax consequences. If eligible, a U.S. investor may avoid many of the negative consequences of the PFIC rules by making a “mark-to-market” election (as explained below) for each taxable year in which our company is a PFIC. For more information please see “Item 10. Additional Information – E. Taxation – United States Federal Income Taxation – Passive Foreign Investment Companies.” You are urged to consult your tax advisors regarding the application of the PFIC rules to you.

 

Risks Related to the Operations of Bezeq and Our Company in Israel

 

Political, economic and military instability in Israel may disrupt our operations and negatively affect our business condition, harm our results of operations and adversely affect our share price.

 

We and the Bezeq Group companies are organized and based in the State of Israel and Bezeq derives substantially all of its revenues from markets within the State of Israel. As a result, political, economic and military conditions affecting Israel directly influence us. Since its establishment in 1948, Israel has been involved in a number of armed conflicts with its Arab neighbors and a state of hostility, varying from time to time in intensity and degree, has continued into 2016. In recent years, there was an escalationhave been hostilities between Israel and Hezbollah in violence amongLebanon and Hamas in the Gaza strip, both of which resulted in rockets being fired into Israel Hamas, the Palestinian Authoritycausing casualties and other groups. Also, since 2011,disruption of economic activities. In addition, Israel faces threats from more distant neighbors, in particular, Iran. In recent years riots and uprisings in several countries in the Middle East and neighboring regions have led to severe political instability in several neighboring states and to a decrease in the regional security situation. Such instability may affect the local and global economy, could negatively affect business conditions and, therefore, could adversely affect our operations. In addition, Iran has threatened to attack Israel and is widely believed to be developing nuclear weapons. Iran is also believed to have a strong influence among extremist groups in areas that neighbor Israel, such as Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon. Although these matters have not had any material effect on our business and results of operations to date, the regional security situation and worldwide perceptions of it are outside our control and there can be no assurance that these matters will not negatively affect us in the future. Any major hostilities involving Israel, a full or partial mobilization of the reserve forces of the Israeli army, the interruption or curtailment of trade between Israel and its present trading partners, or a significant downturn in the economic or financial condition of Israel could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

Our results of operations may be negatively affected by the obligation of our personnel to perform military service.

Many of the Bezeq Group’s and our executive officers and employees in Israel are obligated to perform annual reserve duty in the Israeli Defense Forces and may be called for active duty under emergency circumstances at any time. If a military conflict or war arises, these individuals could be required to serve in the military for extended periods of time. Bezeq’s operations could be disrupted by the absence for a significant period of one or more of its executive officers or key employees or a significant number of other employees due to military service. Any disruption in Bezeq’s operations could adversely affect its business.

Bezeq may be restricted in the conduct of its operations during periods of national emergency, which could negatively affect its business operations.

During periods of national emergency, the Minister of Communications and other governmental authorities may issue various instructions regarding the use of Bezeq’s network, including the use of the network by the Israeli security forces. In addition, the Israeli Equipment Registration and IDF Mobilization Law, 1987 permits the registration, taking and use of engineering equipment and facilities by Israel’s Defense Forces. These actions could adversely affect Bezeq’s business operations.

 1613 

 

 

As a foreign private issuer whose shares are listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market, we may follow certain home country corporate governance practices instead of certain NASDAQ requirements.

 

As a foreign private issuer whose shares are listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market, we are permitted to follow certain home country corporate governance practices instead of certain requirements of the NASDAQ Stock Market Rules. As a foreign private issuer listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market, we may follow home country practice with regard to, among other things, the composition of the board of directors, compensation of officers, director nomination process and quorum at shareholders’ meetings. In addition, we may follow home country practice instead of the NASDAQ requirement to obtain shareholder approval for certain dilutive events (such as for the establishment or amendment of certain equity-based compensation plans, an issuance that will result in a change of control of the company, certain transactions other than a public offering involving issuances of a 20% or more interest in the company and certain acquisitions of the stock or assets of another company). A foreign private issuer that elects to follow a home country practice instead of NASDAQ requirements must submit to NASDAQ in advance a written statement from an independent counsel in such issuer’s home country certifying that the issuer’s practices are not prohibited by the home country’s laws. In addition, a foreign private issuer must disclose in its annual reports filed with the SEC each such requirement that it does not follow and describe the home country practice followed by the issuer instead of any such requirement. Accordingly, our shareholders may not be afforded the same protection as provided under NASDAQ’s corporate governance rules.

 

Our shareholders may have difficulties enforcing a U.S. judgment against us, our executive officers and directors and some of the experts named in this annual report, or asserting U.S. securities law claims in Israel.

 

We are incorporated in Israel and all of our executive officers and directors named in this annual report reside outside the United States. Service of process upon them may be difficult to effect within the United States. Furthermore, all of our assets and most of the assets of our executive officers and directors and some of the experts named in this annual report are located outside the United States. Therefore, a judgment obtained against us or any of them in the United States, including one based on the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws, may not be collectible in the United States and may not be enforced by an Israeli court. It also may be difficult for you to assert U.S. securities law claims in original actions instituted in Israel.

 

Provisions of Israeli law, the licenses of Bezeq and our articles of association may delay, prevent or make difficult an acquisition of our company, which could prevent a change of control and, therefore, depress the price of our shares.

 

Following our acquisition of the controlling interest in Bezeq, we and our shareholders are required to comply with the Communications Law, the Communications Order and regulations promulgated by the Ministry of Communications.

 

Pursuant to the Communications Order, we were required to obtain the prior written consent of the Ministers in order to acquire the controlling interest in Bezeq. Under the Communications Order, no person may hold, directly or indirectly, “significant influence” over Bezeq or 5% or more of any particular class of means of control in Bezeq, nor may any person, together with any other person, appoint, elect or dismiss the general manager of Bezeq or cause the election, appointment or dismissal of any director of Bezeq, without the prior written consent of the Ministers. Subject to certain exceptions, prior written approval of the Ministers is also required to increase the holdings or other rights in excess of those determined in the initial approval, including by means of an agreement (including a voting agreement). Furthermore, under the Communications Order, no person may transfer control, “significant influence” or means of control in Bezeq to another, if, as a result of the transfer, the holdings of the transferee would require approval pursuant to the Communications Law or Communications Order and the transferee is not in possession of the requisite approval. For the foregoing purposes, “significant influence” means the ability to significantly influence the activity of a corporation, whether alone or together with or through others, directly or indirectly, other than as a result of holding “means of control” in that corporation or in another corporation, and including ability derived from the corporation’s articles of association, a written, oral or other kind of agreement, or from any other source. In this context, the right to appoint an officer and holding 25% of our means of control is presumed to confer significant influence. “Means of control” means the right to vote at a general meeting of the company, to appoint a director or general manager of the company, to participate in the profits of the company or a share of the remaining assets of the company after payment of its debts upon liquidation.

 

Israeli corporate law regulates mergers, requires tender offers for acquisitions of shares above specified thresholds, requires special approvals for transactions involving directors, officers or significant shareholders and regulates other matters that may be relevant to these types of transactions. Furthermore, Israeli tax considerations may make potential transactions unappealing to us or to some of our shareholders, including Israeli shareholders and shareholders whose country of residence does not have a tax treaty with Israel exempting such shareholders from Israeli tax. For example, Israeli tax law does not recognize tax-free share exchanges to the same extent as U.S. tax law. With respect to mergers, Israeli tax law allows for tax deferral in certain circumstances but makes the deferral contingent on the fulfillment of numerous conditions, including a holding period of two years from the date of the transaction during which sales and dispositions of shares of the participating companies are limited. Moreover, with respect to certain listed share swap transactions, the tax deferral is limited in time, and when the time expires, tax then becomes payable even if no actual disposition of the shares has occurred. These provisions of Israeli law may delay, prevent or make difficult an acquisition of our company, which could prevent a change of control and therefore depress the price of our shares. For additional discussion about some anti-takeover effects of Israeli law, see Item 10B. “Additional Information - Memorandum and Articles of Association” and Item 10E. “Taxation -Israeli Tax Considerations.”

 

 1714 

 

 

The rights and responsibilities of our shareholders are governed by Israeli law and differ in some respects from those under Delaware law.

 

Because we are an Israeli company, the rights and responsibilities of our shareholders are governed by our articles of association and by Israeli law. These rights and responsibilities differ in some respects from the rights and responsibilities of shareholders in a Delaware corporation. In particular, a shareholder of an Israeli company has a duty to act in good faith towards the company and other shareholders and to refrain from abusing his, her or its power in the company, including, among other things, in voting at the general meeting of shareholders on certain matters. Israeli law provides that these duties are applicable to shareholder votes on, among other things, amendments to a company’s articles of association, increases in a company’s authorized share capital, mergers and interested party transactions requiring shareholder approval. In addition, a shareholder who knows that it possesses the power to determine the outcome of a shareholders’ vote or to appoint or prevent the appointment of a director or executive officer of the company has a duty of fairness towards the company. However, Israeli law does not define the substance of this duty of fairness. There is little case law available to assist in understanding the implications of these provisions that govern shareholder behavior.

 

ITEM 4.INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY

 

A.History and Development of the Company

 

We were organized under the laws of the State of Israel in 1999 as “Gold E Ltd.” We changed our name to Goldtrade Electronic Trading Ltd. in 2000, to Smile.Communications Ltd. in 2006 and to 012 Smile. Communications Ltd. in 2007. On March 16, 2010, we changed our name to B Communications Ltd. in connection with our acquisition of the controlling interest in Bezeq.

 

We are a public limited liability company under the Israeli Companies Law, 5739-1999 and operate under such law and associated legislation. Our principal executive offices are located at 2 Dov Friedman Street, Ramat Gan 5250301, Israel, and our telephone number is +972-3-924-0000. Our website address iswww.bcommunications.co.il. The information on our website is not incorporated by reference into this annual report on Form 20-F.

 

Prior to our October 2007 initial public offering in the United States, we were a wholly-owned subsidiary of Internet Gold, a public company traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market and the TASE. Internet Gold owned 64.78% of our ordinary shares as of the date of this report and Eurocom Communications owned 63.80%61.14% (including 1,125,000 ordinary shares of Internet Gold which are held directly in a joint account by Shaul and Yossef Elovitch). of Internet Gold’s outstanding shares as of such date. Mr. Shaul Elovitch, our chairman and the chairman of Internet Gold and its parent, Eurocom Communications, and the controlling shareholder of Eurocom Communications, is able to exercise control over our operations and business strategy and control the outcome of all matters involving shareholder approval.

Acquisition of the Controlling Interest in Bezeq

 

On April 14, 2010, we completed the acquisition of 30.44% of Bezeq’s outstanding shares from Ap.Sb.Ar. Holdings Ltd. for a purchase price of approximately NIS 6.5 billion in cash and became the controlling shareholder of Bezeq. The Bezeq interest was directly acquired by an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of our company. In accordance with the terms of the transaction, effective as of the closing of the acquisition, we designated seven directors to replace the Apax-Saban-Arkin Group’s representatives. We began consolidating Bezeq’s financial results into our financial statements effective as of the closing of the acquisition and began reporting the consolidated results in our 2010 second quarter earnings release.

 

In addition to our ownership of Bezeq shares, a total of 1,000,000 ordinary shares of Bezeq are jointly held by Mr. Shaul Elovitch, our controlling shareholder, and his brother Mr. Yossef Elovitch. An additional 72,360 ordinary shares of Bezeq are held by Ms. Iris Elovitch, the wife of Mr. Elovitch, and 11,556 ordinary shares of Bezeq are held by Ms. Orna Elovitch, the daughter-in-law of Mr. Elovitch.

Permit to Control Bezeq Granted to Members of the Eurocom Group

 

As part of our acquisition of the controlling interest in Bezeq, we, Internet Gold, SP2, SP1, and other members of the Eurocom Group applied for authorization to control Bezeq, pursuant to the Communications Law and Communications Order. On April 13, 2010, the control permit was granted subject to the condition that SP2 is controlled exclusively by the other parties to the control permit, referred to as the Companies’ Control Permit. Concurrently, a separate control permit was also granted to Messrs. Shaul Elovitch and Yossef Elovitch, our controlling shareholders, referred to as the Individuals’ Control Permit.

 

Through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, the Bezeq Group is a leading provider in Israel of fixed-line telephony services and fixed-line broadband Internet infrastructure access services, cellular telephony services, ISP services, ILD services, international and domestic data transfer and network services and ICT, pay television services and other communications infrastructures and services. In each of these markets, the Bezeq Group holds a significant market share, as indicated in the chart below.

 1815 

 

 

According to the Companies’ Control Permit, the parties (through SP2) must hold not less than 30% of any type of means of control of Bezeq. Such percentage is permitted to decrease to 29% for a period of six months commencing from the date such holdings fall below 30%, in the event of dilution resulting from the exercise of stock options by Bezeq employees. Despite the 30% rule, according to Article 3(a3) of the Communications Order, which is included as part of the Control Permit, the parties to the Control Permit may hold less than 30% under certain circumstances, including the requirement that the parties control Bezeq and maintain at least a 25% ownership interest in Bezeq.

 

In connection with our issuance of the 7⅜% Senior Secured Notes, the Security Agent for such notes was granted a pledge permit which enabled us to pledge the pledged Bezeq Shares and pledged SP2 Shares as collateral for the notes and certain hedging obligations. However, pursuant to the Communications Order and the Pledge Permit, no person (individually and acting in concert with other persons) may directly or indirectly hold, acquire or control, at any given time, more than 10% of the outstanding principal amount of 7⅜% Senior Secured Notes without first obtaining a permit.

For additional discussion about the Control Permit, see Item 4B. “Information On The Company-Regulatory-Permit to Control Bezeq Granted to Members of the Eurocom Group.”

B.Business Overview

 

Since April 14, 2010, we have been the controlling shareholder of Bezeq (TASE:BZEQ), Israel’s largest telecommunications provider. Bezeq is the principal provider of communications services in Israel, providing a broad range of telecommunications operations and services, including domestic fixed-line, cellular and international communication services, Internet services, multi-channel television, television and radio broadcasts, satellite broadcasts, customer call centers, maintenance and development of communications infrastructures, provision of communications services to other communications providers and the supply and maintenance of equipment on customer premises, which is referred to as network end point, or NEP services. Bezeq was founded as a government company in 1980 and became a public company in 1990 with its shares traded on the TASE and included in the TA-25TA-35 Index.

 

Bezeq’s Operations

OurThe principal asset is our controlling interest in Bezeq, Israel’s largest telecommunications provider based on revenue and subscribers. The Bezeq Group operates the most comprehensive telecommunications infrastructure in Israel, with a broad range of telecommunications services across all of its markets. Through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, the Bezeq Group is a leading provider in Israel of fixed-line telephony services and fixed-line broadband Internet infrastructure access services, cellular telephony services, ISP services, ILD services, international and domestic data transfer and network services and ICT, pay television services and other communications infrastructures and services. In each of these markets, the Bezeq Group holds a significant market share,segments are as indicated in the chart below.follows:

 

    As of December 31, 20152016 
Bezeq Group Segments Service Estimated
Market
Share
  Market
Position
 
Bezeq Fixed-Line Telephony (private sector)  56.055.0%  1 of 4 
  Fixed-Line Telephony (business sector)  74.073.0%  1 of 2 
   
Fixed-Line Broadband Internet Infrastructure Access  68.069.0%  1 of 2 
Pelephone Cellular Telephony  25.622.7%*  3 of 5 
Bezeq International ISP  44.0%  1 of 4 
  ILD  21.0%  -
 
DBS Pay Television  44.040.0%  2 of 2 

 

* Estimated market share is as of September 30, 2016.

The Bezeq Group had approximately 2.182.12 million active fixed telephone lines in its fixed-line telephony business, 1.481.56 million fixed-line broadband Internet infrastructure access services subscribers (retail and wholesale), 2.652.40 million cellular telephony services subscribers and 635,000614,000 pay television services subscribers as of December 31, 2015.2016. For the year ended December 31, 2015,2016, the Bezeq Group had revenues of NIS 9.9910.08 billion (approximately $2.56$2.62 billion).

 

In view of a decision of the Supreme Court on August 21, 2009, not to approve the merger of Bezeq and DBS, Bezeq discontinued consolidation of its financial statements with those of DBS, and from that date the investment in DBS shares was presented according to the equity method. The balance of DBS shares were held by Eurocom D.B.S., a company controlled indirectly by Messrs. Shaul and Yossef Elovitch, controlling shareholders of Bezeq.

Until March 25, 2015, Bezeq held 49.78% of the shares of DBS and it also owned stock options which entitled it to acquire an additional 8.6% of the shares of DBS. On March 25, 2015, Bezeq exercised the stock options that it owned, for no payment, and on June 24, 2015 Bezeq completed a transaction in which it acquired all the holdings of Eurocom D.B.S. in DBS, which at that time constituted 50.22% of the issued share capital of DBS (41.62% fully diluted) as well as all the shareholders’ loans that Eurocom provided to DBS (NIS 1,538 million as at December 31, 2014).

On the completion of the transaction, Bezeq transferred the cash consideration of NIS 680 million to Eurocom DBS and Eurocom D.B.S. transferred to Bezeq all its shares and rights to shares in DBS and assigned to Bezeq its entire rights in the shareholders’ loans that it had provided to DBS. Upon completion of the transaction, DBS became a wholly owned subsidiary of Bezeq.

 1916 

 

 

The Bezeq Group’s diversified telecommunications services are based on highly advanced nationwide infrastructures and are provided byIn addition to the following segmentscash payment of NIS 680 million, the Bezeq Group:

Domestic Fixed-Line Communications (Bezeq)

Bezeq is the incumbent and largest provider of fixed-line telephony and fixed-line broadband Internet infrastructure access services in Israel. Its products and services include basic telephony services on domestic telephone lines and associated services and fixed-line broadband Internet infrastructure access services through its nationally deployed, high quality infrastructure network. Bezeqconsideration also offers, among other services, transmission and data communication services, services to other communications operators and broadcasting services. Bezeq’s new high-speed next generation network, or NGN, is the most advanced fixed-line communications network in Israel. The NGN, which covers 100% of Israeli households, uses VDSL2 technology and enables Bezeq to provide bandwidthincluded two additional contingent payments consisting of: (i) an additional payment of up to 100 Mbps (download) speed,NIS 200 million to be paid in accordance with the tax synergy (“First Contingent Payment”); and (ii) an additional payment of NIS 170 million to be paid according to the business results of DBS in the three years following the closing (the “Second Contingent Payment”). Most of the First Contingent Payment was paid after Bezeq entered into a tax assessment agreement and tax decision with the Israeli Tax Authority. Bezeq paid advances on account of the Second Contingent Payment that were not recorded as well as innovative value-added services.an expense in its financial statements. Additionally, Bezeq’s financial reports contain a commitment of NIS 84 million for the Second Contingent Payment based on a management estimate. In the event the proposed merger between Bezeq and DBS takes place in 2017, the amount owed to Eurocom D.B.S. is expected to be the full amount of the Second Contingent Payment, and in the event the proposed merger takes place after the end of 2017, the amount payable to Eurocom D.B.S. will be contingent on the results of DBS for 2017.

According to the conditions prescribed in the Antitrust Authority’s approval of the merger between Bezeq and DBS in March 2014, the following limitations apply with respect to Bezeq and DBS:

 

Bezeq Domestic Fixed-Line CommunicationsAs at and
for any person associated with it will not impose any restriction on the
year ended
December 31,
2015
use of fixed-line Internet infrastructure services stemming from the customer’s cumulative surfing volume, and it may not restrict or block the customer ability to make use of any service or application provided on the Internet.

 (in millions,
except
percentages)
Bezeq will deduct amounts for providing multi-channel TV services from the payments of ISPs for connecting them to the Bezeq network.

Revenues NIS 4,407Bezeq will sell and provide Internet infrastructure services and TV services under equal conditions to all Bezeq customers (the sale of Internet infrastructure services as part of a bundle will not, in itself, be considered a sale under non-equal conditions).

Fixed-line telephony 
Estimated market share(1)65%
Active lines2.181
Churn rate10.1%
Fixed-line broadband Internet infrastructure access
Estimated market share68%
Subscribers1.479Bezeq and DBS will cancel any exclusivity arrangements pertaining to productions that are not original productions and they will not be a party to any such exclusivity arrangements, except in with respect to a third party that held a broadcast license on the date of the decision. For two years from the approval date of the merger, Bezeq will not prevent any entity (excluding an entity that held a broadcast license on the date of the decision) from acquiring rights in original productions.

 

The main purpose of the merger, from the business and economic perspective, is to streamline the activity and operation of Bezeq and DBS and to consolidate it under a single legal entity in order to save operating costs in the long term.

Further to the announcement by the Director General of the Ministry of Communications of December 21, 2016 concerning “cancellation of the structural separation obligation in Bezeq Group, Bezeq and DBS entered into a merger agreement on December 25, 2016. Subject to the conditions precedent set out in the Antitrust Authority’s approval of the merger and as noted below, on the date of completion of the merger, and to be effective retroactively from December 31, 2016, all the activity of DBS will be merged with and into Bezeq, for no payment, in accordance with the provisions of Section 323 of the Companies Law and under the provisions of Sections 103B and 103C of the Income Tax Ordinance. At such time DBS will cease to exist as a separate legal entity, it will be dissolved without liquidation, and the Registrar of Companies will delete it from the register of companies.

Completion of the merger is subject to compliance with the following conditions:

(1)As of December 31, 2015, Bezeq’s market share inObtaining the business and private sectorsapproval of the fixed-line telephony market is estimated to be 74% and 56%, respectively.Companies Registrar (merger certificate).

 

Cellular Telephony (Pelephone)

Obtaining various regulatory approvals from the Ministry of Communications, Minister of Communications and head of the Civil Administration.

 

Pelephone is among the leading cellular telephony services providers in Israel. Pelephone provides cellular telephony services, sells handsets and other end-user equipment, and provides repair services for handsets sold by Pelephone. Pelephone’s nationwide 3.5G UMTS/HSPA+ network supports download speeds of up to 42 Mbps and upload speeds of up to 5.7 Mbps, making it one of the fastest, highest quality and most advanced networks in Israel. We believe these network features provide Pelephone with a strong platform to continue to offer a variety of advanced services and products to its customers and to capitalize on the continued increasing demand for smartphones and advanced data services.

Obtaining approvals from any third parties whose approval is required. If Bezeq’s Board of Directors believes that such approval is immaterial to completion of the merger, it may, in its discretion, waive the obtaining of any third party approval.

 

The intensified competition in the cellular market has led to subscriber churn and a price war where the operators continuously lower prices to undercut the competition. This has led to substantial erosion of the average revenue per subscriber. This trend continued and even increased in 2015, as the average revenue per subscriber decreased by 19% as compared with 2014.

The opening of the market to parallel imports and multiple stores selling terminal equipment has led to a decline in the sales of cellular handsets and terminal equipment by the cellular operators. To minimize its exposure to decreased revenues, Pelephone increased the range of equipment it sells and also sells non-cellular handset terminal equipment such as tablets, laptops and accessories. Pelephone's revenue from terminal equipment in 2015 amounted to NIS 891 million, accounting for 31% of its total revenues compared with terminal equipment revenues of NIS 966 million in 2014, accounting for 28% of its total revenues. Most terminal equipment is sold through monthly installments. The decrease in terminal equipment sales over the years has led to a decrease in trade receivables as well as to a decline in trade payables to terminal equipment suppliers.

The arrangement of any incompatibility that is found upon completion of the merger between the Deed of Trust and the debentures of DBS and fixed liens registered on a particular asset of DBS, and Bezeq’s financing documents, under which a commitment is in place to refrain from creating charges on Bezeq’s assets, lifting the financial restrictions and covenants set out in the financing agreements of DBS, so that they will not apply to the merged company, and all to Bezeq’s satisfaction and as will be approved by Bezeq’s Board of Directors.

 

 2017 

 

 

The cellular market growth rate is lower due to penetration rate saturation. The penetration rateSubsequently, the NIS 389 million of shareholders’ loans registered in IsraelBezeq’s name in the books of DBS, including principal and accrued interest at December 31, 2015 was 124%.

PelephoneAs at and
for the
year ended
December 31,
2015
(in millions,
except percentages)
RevenuesNIS 2,890
Estimated market share25.6%
Active lines2.65
Churn rate25.8%

ISP, ILD, Data Services27, 2016, were converted to equity and ICT (Bezeq International)Bezeq made an additional investment in the capital of DBS against a premium in the amount of NIS 130 million. In September 2016, shareholders’ loans in the amount of NIS 5.3 billion were converted into equity.

 

Bezeq International is the leading provider of ISP services in Israel and one of Israel’s leading providers of ILD and international and domestic data transfer and network services. Bezeq International provides comprehensive communications solutions that include ISP and related value-added services, international and domestic telephony, PBX supply and support, ICT, cloud computing services, data communications and information security, website server hosting and related managed services. Bezeq International also owns the JONAH high-speed submarine optical fiber communications cable system connecting Israel and Europe, which provides increased bandwidth (capacity and speed) and has positioned Bezeq InternationalDBS continue to operate as the sole ISP in Israel to own and operate an advanced international network.separate companies.

 

Bezeq InternationalAs at and
for the
year ended
December 31,
2015
(in millions,
except percentages)
RevenuesNIS 1,578
ISP
Estimated market share44.0%
Churn rate17.3%
ILD
Estimated market share21.0%

Multi-Channel Pay Television (DBS)Our Strategy

  

DBS offers nationwide coverage through its DTH technologyWe view our controlling interest in Bezeq as a strategic asset and iscurrently expect to maintain a long-term controlling interest in Bezeq. The telecommunications market has historically served as a growth engine for the only company in Israel licensedEurocom Group and we intend to provide multi-channel pay television broadcasts via satellitecontinue to focus our business on the telecommunications field. We intend to leverage our long-term experience and is one of only two companies in Israel licensed to provide multi-channel television services, with nation-wide coverage and innovative and advanced technologies, including PVR, VOD and HD television. DBS focuses on creating clear differentiation from its main competitor, HOT, with respect to brand, content and service quality. In addition, DBS has a strong track record of innovative technology development and is a leading provider of value-added services, including hybrid IP and DTH based set-top boxes (including PVR and VOD).

Apart from DBS, the only other broadcasting licenseeexpertise in the multi-channel television broadcasting sector is HOT, which provides cable television servicestelecommunications field to subscriberscontinue to contribute to Bezeq’s management and has a pronounced monopoly underoperations, through ongoing involvement in its business and provision of extensive consulting and strategic services. We intend to continue to reduce our leverage through the Antitrust Law in the multi-channel television broadcasting sector. Cellcom Group's Cellcom also operates in the multi-channel television sector, providing television services via the Internet that customers access to view VOD and a few linear channels (including the DTT content) by either using a special streamer or application.repayment of debt.

DBSAs at and
for the
year ended
December 31,
2015
(in millions,
except
percentages)
RevenuesNIS 1,774
Estimated market share44.0%
Subscribers (in thousands) 635
Churn rate13.9%

21

 

Competitive Strengths

 

We believe that the following competitive strengths will enable us to retain our customer base, capitalize on growth opportunities and maintain and expand our current market share positions, which we expect to contribute to positive cash flow generation.

 

The Bezeq Group is a leading provider of telecommunications services and owner of telecommunications infrastructure in Israel and provides diversified telecommunications offerings across all Israeli telecom markets.

 

The Bezeq Group is the largest and the incumbent telecommunications provider in Israel, offering a broad range of services through its advanced, comprehensive and nationwide telecommunications infrastructure. The Bezeq Group holds a leading position in each of the markets in which it operates, with estimated market shares as of December 31, 2015 of 65% in fixed-line telephony, 68% in fixed-line broadband Internet infrastructure access, 25.6% in cellular telephony, 44% in ISP, 21% in ILD and 44% in pay television, based on the numbers of active lines, subscribers or outgoing minutes, as applicable.operates. As a leading provider in each of these markets, the Bezeq Group has been able to maintain its strong performance and benefit from economies of scale. In addition, such leading positions across a diverse range of telecommunications offerings reduce the Bezeq Group’s exposure to market and regulatory conditions. For example, the Bezeq Group is able to partially mitigate the negative effects of certain market trends, such as fixed-to-mobile substitution, as a result of its presence in the cellular telephony services market and its ability to capture a share of the growing mobile subscriber base. In addition, the Bezeq Group was able to partially offset a decline in revenues in its cellular telephony segment resulting from regulatory changes instituted in January 2011, which led to a significant reduction in interconnect fee tariffs, as a result of the reduction of the Bezeq Group’s expenses for interconnect fees in the fixed-line communications segment.

We believe that the Bezeq Group’s ability to maintain a leading position in the Israeli telecommunications market in the face of competitive and regulatory pressures reflects, among other things, the underlying strength of its advanced nationwide network infrastructures, the strength of its brands and its extensive offering of high quality content.

 

The Bezeq Group operates in an attractive macroeconomic environment with a developed telecommunications market.

 

Israel is a developed, industrialized market characterized by strong macroeconomic fundamentals. Israel is a member of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, or OECD, and had GDP per capita of $33,718$ in 2014.2016.

 

The Israeli telecommunications market is highly developed and benefits from favorable dynamics, including high penetration rates across all telecommunications services, high penetration of postpaid contracts in the cellular telephony market, rapid adoption rates of new technologies and significant expenditures on telecommunications services by consumers and businesses. In addition, Israel is expected to experience steady population growth, which should provide a natural expansion of the addressable market. In particular, Bezeq expects such population trends will lead to a steady demand for fixed-line telephony services in Israel, especially among certain sectors of the growing population in Israel where fixed-line telephony is in widespread use. Furthermore, a relatively young population contributes to the attractiveness of the market, as such consumers typically spend more on telecommunications products and services while also driving increased demand for new technologies. We believe that the potential future growth in the Israeli telecommunications market will be driven by continued strong demand for higher bandwidth, both on the broadband Internet and mobile platforms, and advanced value-added services and technologies across all telecommunications services.

 

22

The Bezeq Group owns advanced nationwide network infrastructures and is positioned at the forefront of technological innovation across all of the telecom markets in Israel.

The Bezeq Group has historically made substantial investments in its fully owned infrastructure, which is one of the most technologically advanced in Israel and enables the Bezeq Group to reach customers nationwide.

Bezeq has a Next-Generation Network (NGN) based on a core IP network and deployment of an optical fiber network to street cabinets (a network topology known as Fiber to the Curb, or FTTC) and also based on an access network (a system that connects NEPs on the subscriber's premises to the network and engineering systems). Bezeq completed the deployment of the network at the end of 2015. The connection from the home, or the terminal equipment (equipment which is installed on the subscriber's premises, e.g., the actual telephone, private exchanges, fax machines, modems, routers, etc.) through which the subscriber receives the service,to the access network is based on copper cables and optical cables that connect the access systems to the backbone over optic cables (through special pipes or an above ground network) and to a limited degree through wireless systems.

Today, using VDSL2 technology, it is possible to provide a bandwidth of up to 100 Mbps downstream, as well as innovative added-value services. Other advantages of the new technology are simplification of the network structure and better management ability.

 

The following graph illustrates changes in the surfing speeds of Bezeq's Internet subscribers 2011-2015 (in Mbps at the end of each year):

18

 

 

 

Pelephone currently operates communications networks using three main technologies:

 

TheLTE 4G LTE technology is based on GSM standards. The advantages of this technology are larger data communication capacity and faster download rates than with the 3G technologies. All the terminal devices that support this technology also support the 3G technologies and the transition between the technologies is seamless.

 
The UMTS/HSPA a digital technology is based on the GSM 3G standard. This technology is globally widespread, and enables subscriber identification and services to be provided through a SIM card, which can be moved from one handset to another. The advantage of thisThis technology inter alia, is that it supports download speeds of up to 42 Mbps and upload speeds of up to 5.7 Mbps. This communication network is Pelephone's primary network.

 
CDMA digital technology. This technology is less prevalent worldwide than UMTS/HSPA and subscriber identification is via identification details burned onto the subscriber's terminal equipment rather than by means of a SIM card. To date, this network serves a limited number of subscribers who seldom use the network. SincePelephone expects to cease operating this network in 2017, subject to the UMTS/HSAP network was launched,approval of the Ministry of Communications. Pelephone is workingacting to transfer the existing CDMA network subscribers from CDMA to the UMTS/HSPA offering to upgrade their handsets to the new network. Pelephone is not expanding its investment in this network beyond the needs of current maintenance.and LTE networks.

The infrastructures for Pelephone's networks are mainly based at two switch farms which are connected to more than 2,300 sites.

Under an agreement entered into in 2014, L.M. Ericsson Israel Ltd., or Ericsson, serves as Pelephone's supplier for the deployment of its 4G LTE radio network. In recent years Pelephone invested NIS 460 million in the deployment of the network, including acquisition of frequencies, and Pelephone estimates that its total investments in infrastructures in 2017 will not be materially different from the investments it made in 2016. Pelephone does not expect to significantly increase its investment in infrastructure. In addition, over the coming decade Pelephone will be required to continue to establish new broadcast sites, in order to comply with the terms of its mobile telephony license.

 

In the ISP, ILD, data transfer, networks and ICT services segment, Bezeq International is currently the sole ISP in Israel to own and operate its own high-speed submarine optical fiber communications cable system. The JONAH cable, which was launched in January 2012, has a capacity of over 7.0 Tbps and provides Bezeq International with greater capacity for utilization than any other ISP in Israel. In addition, Bezeq International is able to obtain such capacity at an incremental cost, while other ISPs in Israel are required to purchase capacity and rely on one of the two other cable operators in Israel (MedNautilus and Tamares). The JONAH cable is fully redundant (i.e., utilizes two equipped fiber pairs), and in addition, Bezeq International has available capacity on two alternate submarine routes to Europe.

23

 

In the multi-channel pay television segment, DBS is the only licensed provider of multi-channel television broadcasts via satellite in Israel. While DBS relies on third party providers for the provision of satellite capacity, it owns the satellite dishes that carry the signals from such satellites to subscriber residences and set-top boxes. DBS differentiates itself from its main competitor, HOT, by offering a wide range of high quality content and by utilizing technology to be the first pay television services provider to offer new and innovative value-added services to subscribers. For instance, DBS was the first provider in Israel to offer a set-top box that combined PVR, VOD and HD capabilities in one device (branded as “yes MaxTotal”). DBS’s PVR offering enables subscribers to download a movie or series to their yes MaxTotal set-top box over the Internet and watch recorded content immediately or at a later time. DBS is also the only provider in Israel that offers a multiroom service allowing subscribers to watch recorded content on multiple capable set-top boxes (“yes MultiRoom”) and in 2014 DBS introduced its TV Everywhere service, branded as yesGo, which allows subscribers to watch content from mobile devices. In 2015, DBS began to offer a HDPVR converter known as yesQuattro that allows the recording of up to 4 channels simultaneously in addition to the channel being viewed, has increased the number shows that may be recorded, and allows the automatic recording of prime time content (6:00 PM to midnight) on two channels that the subscriber can select for seven days (known as PrimeTime service).

 

DBS also operates its yesGo service, which allows subscribers to view the channels included under the service that they have purchased for home television viewing and VOD content, over a variety of terminal devices (smartphones, tablets and PCs).

 

At present, there are additional

19

Other providers (other than Cellcom) that enable VOD viewing through the Internet, such as AppleTV and Netflix (which currently offer content without Hebrew translations). OtherSeveral entities are considering launching similar services.

 

The Bezeq Group’s brands are among the strongest and most widely recognized brands in Israel and are supported by its substantial investments in marketing, strong product and service offerings, extensive distribution network and leading customer service offerings.

 

The Bezeq Group’s brands are among the strongest and most widely recognized brands in Israel, including Bezeq, Pelephone, Bezeq International and DBS. The Bezeq Group’s brands have been supported by its sustained and substantial investments in strong product and service offerings, marketing, extensive distribution network and leading customer service offerings. We believe the Bezeq Group’s product and service offerings combined with its advanced technology and infrastructure are the key factors driving the association of the Bezeq, Pelephone, Bezeq International and YES brands with reliability, speed, excellent service and innovation throughout Israel. The Bezeq Group’s marketing campaigns focus on and highlight various elements regarding each of its brands. For example, Bezeq focuses on the value-added services offered with its fixed-line broadband Internet infrastructure access service, Pelephone highlights the speed of its network, Bezeq International focuses on providing faster Internet speed than its competitors and its strong customer service, and DBS emphasizes its large selection of high quality international content and the subscriber viewing experience associated with it. Furthermore, the Bezeq Group also provides its customers with award winning customer service offerings in order to enhance customer loyalty.

 

The Bezeq Group has an extensive offering of high quality content.

 

Through its wholly-owned subsidiary, DBS, the Bezeq Group is able to complement its extensive telecommunications infrastructure with a wide array of high quality content. For instance, DBS, which benefits from strong content differentiation in the pay television market, provides a leading selection of television series and movies. With respect to television series, DBS broadcasts new television series at a minimal delay, in some cases within hours from the time the content is originally aired in the United States or worldwide. DBS also has an agreement with HBO pursuant to which DBS aired all of HBO’s new English language television series and movies, the majority of which were only aired in Israel on DBS. The Bezeq Group’s extensive offering of high quality content distinguishes it from competitors, and we believe that such distinction will likely enhance the Bezeq Group’s competitive position if and when the Israeli wholesale market develops and the Bezeq Group’s competitors that do not currently offer bundled packages with pay television begin doing so.

 

The Bezeq Group’s strong cash flow generation supports substantial and consistent dividends while providing for investment in the business and maintenance of a conservative level of leverage.

 

The Bezeq Group is a highly cash generative business and has a proven track record of consistent operating cash flow generation. The Bezeq Group’s stable, and in some segments, growing customer base and attractive offerings and services, together with its focus on profitability, provide it with strong revenues, Adjusted EBITDA margin and operating cash flow. While generating strong cash flow, the Bezeq Group has continued to invest in its business, technologies and infrastructure through major capital expenditure programs, several of which were completed in the last four years (including, the deployment of Bezeq’s NGN, Pelephone’s advanced 3.5G UMTS/HSPA+4G cellular network and the launch of Bezeq International’s JONAH cable).

 

24

The following table sets forth the Bezeq Group’s operating cash flow and ratio of capital expenditures to revenues for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2015.2016. The operations of DBS have been included for the last nine months of 2015.

 Year ended December 31,  Year ended December 31, 
 2013 2014 2015  2014 2015 2016 
 (NIS in millions except
percentages)
  (NIS in millions except percentages) 
Operating cash flow  4,152   3,796   3,740   3,796   3,740   3,526 
Capital expenditure, net  916   1,045   1,484   1,045   1,484   1,278 
Capital expenditure, net as a % of revenue  9.6%  11.5%  14.9%  11.5%  14.9%  12.7%

 

We believe the Bezeq Group has a conservative capital structure and that such conservative capital structure and strong cash flow generation have historically enabled Bezeq to make consistent dividend payments to its shareholders. Since 2006, Bezeq has distributed dividends in an amount equal to 100% of its net income after minority share in each year (and in addition, in each of 2007 and 2011,has also approved a special dividend was approved for distribution).on two occasions.

 

The Bezeq Group has an experienced management team with a proven track record in the Israeli telecommunications industry.

 

The Bezeq Group’s management team has significant experience in the telecommunications industry, including with respect to the transformation of telecommunications companies and generating growth. The Bezeq Group’s executive management has a proven track record in leading international and domestic technology and telecommunications companies and has successfully delivered efficient operating performance and strong returns for its shareholders despite increasing regulatory hurdles and competition in recent years. In recent years, the Bezeq Group’s management has overseen significant investments in infrastructure to position the members of the Bezeq Group at the forefront of technology for the coming years.

20

 

We are the sole controlling shareholder of Bezeq and have a management team with significant experience in developing and operating telecommunications companies.

 

We have sole control of Bezeq and, together with our controlling shareholders and members of the Eurocom Group, are the only entities or persons that hold a permit to control and direct the activities of Bezeq. Since our acquisition of the controlling interest in Bezeq, we have nominated all of the members of Bezeq’s board of directors who were elected by shareholders, excluding employee representatives on the Board whose nominations require the prior approval of our ultimate controlling shareholder, Mr. Shaul Elovitch, as chairman of Bezeq’s Board of Directors, pursuant to Bezeq’s collective bargaining agreement.

 

Our management team and controlling shareholder have long-standing experience in the communications sector. Our founder and Chairman, Mr. Shaul Elovitch, was one of the founders of some of Israel’s leading telecommunications businesses (including, among others, DBS, Partner and Internet Gold) and other major investment businesses, and has over 40 years of experience in the telecommunications market. Our Chief Executive Officer, Doron Turgeman, has over 1920 years of experience in the telecommunications sector.

 

Our controlling shareholder, Eurocom Communications, is one of Israel’s largest holding groups, with extensive experience in the telecommunications market and controlling stakes in other telecommunications companies, including Spacecom, Satcom, all of which operate in the field of satellite communications, Eurocom Cellular, a leading supplier in Israel of cellular devices, and Eurocom Digital, a leading supplier in Israel of communications products.

Our Strategy

We view our holding in Bezeq as a strategic asset and currently expect to maintain a long-term controlling interest in Bezeq. The telecommunications market has historically served as a growth engine for the Eurocom Group and we intend to continue to focus our business on the telecommunications field. We intend to leverage our long-term experience and expertise in the telecommunications field to continue to contribute to Bezeq’s management and operations, through ongoing involvement in its business and provision of extensive consulting and strategic services. Over the coming years we intend to gradually reduce our leverage level through the repayment of debt.

 

Products and Services

 

The Bezeq Group provides a wide range of telecommunications services for its business and private customers, including domestic fixed-line telephony and fixed-line broadband Internet infrastructure access services, cellular telephony services, ISP, ILD, data services, ICT solutions, multi-channel television broadcasts via satellite, customer call centers, maintenance and development of communications infrastructures, provision of communications services to other communications providers and the supply and maintenance of equipment on customer premises, also known as network end point (NEP) services.

25

 

Since May 2010, Bezeq has been permitted to offer joint service packages with its subsidiaries to private subscribers, and since July 2012, Bezeq has been permitted to offer joint service packages with its subsidiaries to business subscribers, in each case, subject to the approval of the joint service package by the Ministry of Communications and other conditions contained in Bezeq’s license. The joint service packages must be capable of being “unbundled” such that each service included in a package must be offered separately and on the same terms, which effectively prevents the Bezeq Group from enhancing the attractiveness of the offer by offering a discount on the joint service packages. Joint service packages marketed by Bezeq’s subsidiaries that include the services of Bezeq are also subject to similar limitations, including “unbundling” (except for a bundle offered by a subsidiary that only contains Bezeq’s fixed-line broadband Internet infrastructure access service).

 

Bezeq currently offers packages that combine a subscription to Bezeq’s fixed-line broadband Internet infrastructure access and to the accompanying ISP service, with the ability to choose from any ISP provider in Israel, including Bezeq International. The packages are “unbundled” and offered at the same price that the standalone services would cost if subscribed to separately. In addition, Bezeq offers packages to business customers that combine Bezeq’s business data lines and the accompanying ISP service from Bezeq International. These packages are also “unbundled” and offered at the same price that the standalone services would cost if subscribed to separately. Business customers are also not required to use Bezeq International as their ISP provider and have the ability to choose any ISP provider in Israel.

 

These restrictions, and in particular the unbundling obligation which severely limits the Group's ability to offer discounts on the components of the bundle, puts the Group in a competitively inferior position as compared to the competing communications groups which are not subject to similar restrictions in marketing joint bundles (other than a restriction on marketing a joint bundle of HOT-Net and other companies in the HOT Group). Bezeq's restrictions are more significantly manifested with the implementation of the wholesale BSA services and the option for ISPs to provide end-to-end services to customers at reduced prices compared with the bundles that Bezeq can market, which can be unbundled.

 

There is a dispute between Bezeq, Cellcom and Partner regarding the terms of the agreement for packages marketed by Bezeq, Bezeq's Internet infrastructure services together with ISP services. In this matter, Cellcom and Partner lodged complaints with the Ministry of Communications and the Antitrust Authority. Bezeq has sent its response.

21

 

Domestic Fixed-Line Communications (Bezeq)

 

Bezeq is the incumbent and largest provider of fixed-line telephony and fixed-line broadband Internet infrastructure access services in Israel. Its products and services include basic telephony services on domestic telephone lines and associated services and fixed-line broadband Internet infrastructure access services through its nationally deployed, high quality infrastructure network. Bezeq also offers, among other services, transmission and data communication services, services to other communications operators and broadcasting services. Bezeq’s new high-speed next generation network, or NGN, is the most advanced fixed-line communications network in Israel. The NGN, which covers 100% of Israeli households, uses VDSL2 technology and enables Bezeq to provide bandwidth of up to 100 Mbps (download) speed, as well as innovative value-added services.

Bezeq Domestic Fixed-Line CommunicationsAs at and
for the
year ended
December 31,
2016
(in millions,
except
percentages)
Revenues (in NIS)4,383
Fixed-line telephony
Estimated market share(1)64%
Active lines2.119
Churn rate10.4%
Fixed-line broadband Internet infrastructure access
Estimated market share69%
Subscribers1.558

(1)As of December 31, 2016, Bezeq’s market share in the business and private sectors of the fixed-line telephony market is estimated to be 73% and 55%, respectively.

Fixed-Line Telephony Services

 

Bezeq had approximately 2.12 million fixed telephone million active lines as of December 31, 2016. Bezeq’s fixed-line telephony services include basic telephony service on domestic telephone lines and associated value-added services, such as voice mail, caller ID, call waiting, call forwarding and conference calls. Bezeq also offers its business customers national toll free numbers which provide for full or partial payment for customer calls by the business customer.

 

As of December 31, 2015, Bezeq had 2.18 million active fixed telephone lines in Israel. Bezeq offers a variety of payment plans, ranging from a monthly subscription fee per fixed telephone line and charge per second of use, to various fixed-line telephony packages comprised of monthly amounts of minutes for a fixed monthly fee.

 

Most of Bezeq’s fixed-line telephony services are subject to regulatory tariff control and the prices for such services are governed by such regulations. With respect to services that are not subject to tariff control, Bezeq is required under the Israeli Communications Law to set reasonable tariffs for such services. In addition, Bezeq is allowed to offer “alternative payment packages” for services that are subject to tariff control, with different pricing than the regulated tariff, subject to certain conditions.

 

Fixed-Line Broadband Internet Infrastructure Access Services

 

Bezeq provides broadband Internet access infrastructure services in xDSL technology. Internet service has become one of Bezeq's main activities and is a central focus for its investments in Israeltechnology, marketing, advertising, customer acquisition and upgrades. The average surfing speed of Bezeq's Internet subscribers at the end of 2016 was 43.4 Mbps compared with an average of 37.8 Mbps at the end of 2015. The minimum speed of the package provided for new customers is segregated into two separate elements comprised of infrastructure or network access services and ISP services. As such, a customer wishing to subscribe to fixed-line Internet services in Israel effectively needs to purchase infrastructure access services, which are provided exclusively by Bezeq and HOT, the only telecommunication operators in Israel that own national fixed-line network infrastructures, and ISP services, which can be provided by any licensed provider. The customer retains the choice with regards to providers for both services, i.e., it may choose to subscribe to the fixed-line broadband Internet infrastructure access facilities of Bezeq or HOT while using a separate ISP provider.usually 15 Mbps.

 

Bezeq provides fixed-line broadband Internet infrastructure access servicesxDSL service is also provided free of charge on subscriber lines with no telephony and at no additional cost. According to approximately 65%a decision of the Israeli market based onMinistry of Communications (in respect of the numbercancellation of subscribers. There has beenNDSL services), Bezeq may not apply differential xDSL pricing between subscribers who use the service together with telephony service and subscribers who only use the xDSL service. Bezeq also provides a growing demandfree WiFi service that enables its customers to share part of their wireless bandwidth in return for higher bandwidth speedbrowsing outside of their homes as well and benefiting from Bezeq’s fixed-line broadband Internet infrastructure access services subscribers in recent years.nationwide and worldwide hotspots.

 

 2622 

 

 

Bezeq offers its fixed-lineis obligated to provide broadband Internet infrastructure access services in a varietyBSA wholesale format to service provides that provide end-to-end Internet services in this way to their customers, including infrastructure.

Graph – Changes in the surfing speeds of packages, with prices varying according to bandwidth, and currently offers itsBezeq's Internet subscribers packages with bandwidth speeds ranging from 5in 2012-2016
(in Mbps up to 100 Mbps, depending, among other things, on the distance of the subscriber’s premises from the street cabinet and the technology available at the subscriber’s premises. Since April 2012, Bezeq has not been permitted to offer its fixed-line broadband Internet infrastructure access services at a reduced price when sold together with its fixed-line telephony services.end of each year):

 

Bezeq offers add-on and value-added services to its fixed-line broadband Internet infrastructure access services subscribers, including Bezeq’s recent offering of a shared national free WiFi network (a service allowing Bezeq’s broadband subscribers to share a portion of their wireless bandwidth with other subscribers in return for the ability to browse outside of their homes using other subscribers’ wireless bandwidth), free cloud services, anti-virus and parental controls. Bezeq charges its subscribers a monthly fee for certain of these add-on services. In addition, Bezeq offers the “Bhome” service, which is a "smart home" service that allows Bezeq’s Internet subscribers to be updated on events at home in real time via their smartphones and cameras and sensors installed at home. 

 

Transmission and Data Communication Services

 

Bezeq provides a wide variety ofData communication services are network services for point-to-point data transmission, data transmission between computers and transmissionbetween various communications networks, services both to its business customers andconnect communications networks to other telecommunication operators. Bezeq’s data service offerings include point to point, or point to multi point, network topology for business to business and multi-branch business customers, as well as connectivity,the Internet, access and remote access services. Bezeq provides these services on multiple platforms, from its legacy infrastructures to its newer and more advanced infrastructures, such as IPVPN and metro Ethernet.

 

Bezeq offers high-speed transmission services, including high speed, to communications operators and their business customers over a substantial numbervariety of interfaces.

There is also a decline in use of Bezeq's transmission and data communication services by communications providers, in part as a result of the trend of entry of communications operators in Israel. Among other services, Bezeq provides backhaul services to cellular telephony operators and transmission connectivity services to wireline operators, ILD providers, ISPs and to the Palestinian Authority operators. Bezeq offers similar services to business customers, with a wide variety of bandwidths and interfaces.groups.

 

Other Services

 

Miscellaneous services to communications operators.Bezeq provides various services to other communications operators, including rentalcellular operators, international call operators, HOT, NEP operators, ISPs, domestic carriers, and Palestinian communications providers.

Among the services provided by Bezeq are infrastructure services, infrastructure upgrades, connection to Bezeq's network, billing services, leasing of space, and provision of services in its rented properties, hosting of cellular sites, billing and collection for ILD operators and special services for ISPs.

Infrastructure services for HOT. Bezeq installs and provides maintenance for the portion of HOT’s cable network that runs through Bezeq’s ducts and poles, which accounts for a substantial portion of HOT’s cable network.leased premises.

 

Broadcast services.services

Bezeq operates and maintains radio transmitters thatwhich are operated by radio stations and operators, including the Israel Broadcasting Corporation, and the Israeli Defense ForceIsrael Army Radio (Galei Zahal). Bezeq, among others, and also maintains and operates the transmitters of several regional radio stations and the DTT transmitters for the Second Authority. While Bezeq is responsible for the operation and maintenance of the transmitters, it is not responsible for the content of the broadcasts.

 

Contract work.work

Bezeq performs setupinstalls, maintains, and operational work onoperates networks and sub-networksor subnetworks for various customers such as(e.g., the Israel Ministry of Defense, HOT Telecom, radio and television broadcasting companies, cellular andoperators, international communicationcall operators, local authorities, municipalities, and government agencies.bodies). Bezeq has agreements with HOT Telecom to provide installation, maintenance and network hosting services using Bezeq's infrastructures.

Private and virtual exchange services

Bezeq operates an IP Centrex service, which is a private and virtual exchange service in a public network (including a private cloud exchange service (HIPT) to customers with a large number of extensions).

Data Center

A service enabling a backup and survivability solution for customers.

144 website (B144)

A search engine for telephone numbers of businesses and private persons, including a classified search.

Bcloud service

Enables Bezeq’s Internet customers to store data and digital media in a virtual cloud.

23

Bhome service

A smart home service that allows Bezeq's Internet subscribers to be updated and control everything that happens at home in real time by smartphone using cameras and sensors installed at home.

Smart city service

A service launched in August 2016 that includes a complete urban management system for a variety of urban services aimed at improving the service to residents while streamlining and saving municipal resources using advanced technology. The system is planned to include a command and control system, wireless surfing throughout the city, security cameras and management of various municipal services. A similar platform is also planned for services to businesses and other smart facilities.

 

The following table shows the distribution of Bezeq'sBezeq’s Domestic Fixed-Line Communications revenues byfrom its main products and services in its segmentssegment of operation, from 2013 to 20152014-2016 (in NIS millions):

 

  2015  2014  2013 
Revenues from fixed-line telephony  1,586   1,668   1,971 
Percentage out of total Bezeq revenues in the segment  35.99%  38.64%  44.02%
Revenues from Internet infrastructure services  1,542   1,394   1,287 
Percentage out of total Bezeq revenues in the segment  34.99%  32.30%  28.74%
Revenues from transmission and data communication services  1,058   1,022   990 
Percentage out of total Bezeq revenues in the segment  24.01%  23.67%  22.10%
Revenues from other services  221   233   230 
Percentage out of total Bezeq revenues in the segment  5.01%  5.39%  5.14%
Total revenues from the domestic fixed-line communication services segment  4,407   4,317   4,478 
  2016  2015  2014 
Revenues from Bezeq’s fixed-line telephony  1,490   1,586   1,668 
Percentage of total Bezeq’s Fixed-Line revenues in the segment  33.99%  35.99%  38.64%
Revenues from Internet infrastructure services  1,597   1,542   1,394 
Percentage of total Bezeq’s Fixed-Line revenues in the segment  36.43%  34.99%  32.30%
Revenues from transmission and data communication services  1,077   1,058   1,022 
Percentage of total Bezeq’s Fixed-Line revenues in the segment  24.57%  24.01%  23.67%
Revenues from other services  219   221   233 
Percentage out of total Bezeq’s Fixed-Line revenues in the segment  5.00%  5.01%  5.39%
Total revenues of the Bezeq Domestic Fixed-Line Communication segment  4,383   4,407   4,317 

 

27

Bezeq’sThe Bezeq Domestic Fixed-Line Communication segment revenues are distributed intoattributable to two main customer types –types: private (57%(53%), and business (43%(47%). The distribution is by revenues asis shown in the following table:

 

 2015  2014  2013  2016  2015  2014 
Revenue from private customers  2,507   2,498   2,605   2,329   2,507   2,498 
Revenue from business customers  1,900   1,819   1,873   2,054   1,900   1,819 
Total revenue  4,407   4,317   4,478   4,383   4,407   4,317 

 

Cellular Telephony (Pelephone)

Pelephone is among the leading cellular telephony services providers in Israel. Pelephone provides cellular telephony services, sells handsets and other end-user equipment, and provides repair services for handsets sold by Pelephone.

PelephoneAs at and
for the
year ended
December 31,
2016
(in millions,
except percentages)
Revenues (in NIS)2,630
Estimated market share (as of September 30, 2016)22.7%
Active lines2.40
Churn rate23.7%

24

Services provided by Pelephone:

Package services. Package services provided by Pelephone include:

Basic telephone services (voice) – basic voice services, call completion and auxiliary services such as call waiting, follow-me, voice mailbox, voice conference call and caller ID, MMS multimedia messages and more.

Browsing and data communications services – Internet browsing using 3G and 4G mobile devices.

Messaging service – a service for sending and receiving SMS text messages and multimedia MMS messages.

Content services. Pelephone offers its customers content services such as video services, Pelephone cloud backup and storage, anti-virus, a variety of televisions channels (Super TV) and a music library (Musix) that enables listening to a variety of music via mobile phone and PC.

Roaming services.Pelephone offers roaming services to customers traveling to countries throughout the world by using their own personal handset, with roaming coverage in more than 220 countries. Pelephone also provides incoming roaming services for the customers of foreign operators staying in Israel.

Service and repair services.Pelephone offers expanded repair and warranty services; for a monthly fee entitling the customer to mobile handset repair and warranty services, or for a one-time payment at the time of repair. Pelephone provides these services to its subscribers as well as under hosting agreements.

The mobile radio telephony segment is extremely competitive. The continuous competition in this sector has led to the high churn of subscribers between the cellular operators and erosion of their revenues, and to an increase in the Internet browsing volume included in the base package that has caused significant erosion of the average revenue per user (ARPU). These trends continued and even increased in 2016. In 2016, revenues from mobile radio services amounted to NIS 1,818 million compared with NIS 1,999 million in 2015 and NIS 2,453 million in 2014.

Opening of the market to parallel imports and opening of multiple stores selling terminal equipment has led to a decline in the sales of cellular handsets and terminal equipment by the cellular operators. To minimize the loss of revenues, Pelephone increased the range of equipment it sells and it also sells non-cellular electronic equipment. The launch of Chinese brands alongside the launch of lower price models of devices of other manufacturers has led to a decline in the average revenue per device. In February 2016, Pelephone launched a private brand of terminal equipment (GINI) that includes several models. Pelephone's revenues from the sale of terminal and electronic equipment amounted to NIS 812 million in 2016, representing 31% of Pelephone's total revenues, compared to revenues of NIS 891 million in 2015. Most terminal and electronic equipment is sold on credit. The decrease in terminal equipment sales over the years has led to a decrease in trade receivables as well as a decline in trade payables to terminal equipment suppliers.

Pelephone also offers various types of mobile phones, on-board telephones, hands-free devices and accessories that support its range of services. Pelephone also offers its customers other terminal equipment such as tablets, laptops, modems, television sets and game consoles.

 

Pelephone offers its subscribers comprehensive voice, data and text messaging services and advanced multimedia services through its nationwide 3.5G UMTS/HSPA+4G network. Pelephone’s basic cellular telephony (voice) services include basic call services, call completion services and auxiliary services such as call waiting, call forwarding, voice mail, voice conference call and caller ID. Pelephone’s customers can also access Internet services by using their handsets or through a cellular modem, or netstick, with download speeds of up to 42 Mbps. Pelephone’s value-added services include short text messages, or SMS, multimedia messages, or MMS, and content services. Pelephone also offers its customers handset repair services for a monthly payment.

 

Pelephone offers a variety of packages that combine the several services it makes available to subscribers. Such packages are primarily “unlimited” packages (where the subscriber pays a fixed usage fee and is entitled to make unlimited use of the services according to the terms of the purchased plan), however Pelephone also offers usage fee packages (where the subscriber pays a monthly fee for up to a limited usage and are charged according to their excess use beyond the limit). Since February 2011, Pelephone’s contracts with private customers have not included any commitment period. Pelephone’s arrangements with large business customers with over 100 subscribers include commitment periods of up to 36 months.

 

Pelephone also provides international roaming services, based on agreements it has with cellular telephony operators abroad. In addition, Pelephone provides inbound roaming services to the customers of foreign operators while they are in Israel.

 

Pelephone offers various types of mobile phones, on-board telephones, hands-free devices and accessories that support its range of services. Pelephone also offers its customers other terminal equipment such as tablets, laptops, modems, television sets and game consoles.

In February 2016, Pelephone launched a private label terminal equipment brand (GINI), which initially included several 4G device models that will subsequently be augmented with additional models of phablets and tablets.

Revenue from products and services

The following table provides a breakdown of Pelephone's revenues from products and services (in NIS(NIS in millions) in the last three years:

 

Products and Services 2015  2014  2013 
Products and services 2016  2015  2014 
Revenue from services  1,999   2,453   2,808   1,818   1,999   2,453 
Percentage of Pelephone's total revenue  69.2%  71.7%  73.7%  69.1%  69.2%  71.7%
Revenue from products (terminal equipment)  891   966   1,001   812   891   966 
Percentage of Pelephone's total revenue  30.8%  28.3%  26.3%  30.9%  30.8%  28.3%
Total revenue  2,890   3,419   3,809   2,630   2,890   3,419 

25

 

The following table provides a breakdown of revenue from customers (in NIS millions) in the last three years:

 

Products and Services 2015  2014  2013 
Products and services 2016  2015  2014 
Revenue from private customers  1,750   1,930   2,114   1,616   1,750   1,930 
Revenue from business customers*  1,140   1,490   1,695   1,015   1,140   1,490 
Total revenue  2,890   3,419   3,809   2,630   2,890   3,419 

 

*   The revenueRevenue from business track customers includes revenuerevenues from hosting agreements which amounted to NIS 46 million in 2015 (NIS 244 million in 2014).agreements.

 

28

AsAt the end of December 31, 2015,2016 Pelephone had 2.652.4 million subscribers. Pelephone also had 925,000 pre-paid733,000 prepaid subscribers (customers who pay for communications services in advance), but at the end of 2016. The revenues from these customers are not a significant portion of itsmaterial in relation to Pelephone's total revenues. The number of prepaid subscribers includes 57,000 subscribers who were considered postpaid subscribers and were reclassified as prepaid subscribers in 2016.

In addition to Pelephone'sthe abovementioned subscribers, who are end-customers thatend customers actually useusing Pelephone's network, Pelephone provides services under hosting agreements to other cellular operators that use Pelephone'sits network to provide services to their customers. Most of thePelephone’s hosting incomerevenues in 2016 came from Rami Levy and in 2015 most of such revenues came from Rami Levy and Alon Cellular. MostCellular (which was acquired by Pelephone in October 2015).

At the end of the hosting income in 2014 came from HOT Mobile, whose hosting agreement withsecond quarter of 2016, Pelephone ended in December 2014.implemented a one-time derecognition of 499,000 CDMA network subscribers (of which 455,000 were pre-paid subscribers and 44,000 were post-paid subscribers) subscribers that had not made outgoing calls or used the network for browsing during the six months prior to the date of the derecognition. The derecognition of subscribers followed a series of actions taken by Pelephone to reduce the number of CDMA network subscribers, which include, among other things, initiating contact and marketing offers targeting CDMA subscribers to switch to its UMTS/HSPA and LTE networks.

 

ISP, ILD, Data Services and ICT (Bezeq International)

Bezeq International is the leading provider of ISP services in Israel and one of Israel’s leading providers of ILD and international and domestic data transfer and network services. Bezeq International provides comprehensive communications solutions that include ISP and related value-added services, international and domestic telephony, PBX supply and support, ICT, cloud computing services, data communications and information security, website server hosting and related managed services. Bezeq International also owns the JONAH high-speed submarine optical fiber communications cable system connecting Israel and Europe, which provides increased bandwidth (capacity and speed) and has positioned Bezeq International as the sole ISP in Israel to own and operate an advanced international network.

The international telephony market in Israel has in recent years seen a decline in call volume, (incoming and outgoing), mainly due to the service bundles offered by the cellular companies that include international calls as well as the multiple free applications that enable calls via the web. In 2016 the international telephony market declined (in number of minutes) by 11%.

26

The Internet market recorded continued growth stagnation in 2016 together with an increase in the surfing speeds consumed. Generally, the increase in demand for high speed browsing requires Bezeq International to periodically increase its operating capacity via its Jonah submarine cable and the international capacity rights it acquires.

Bezeq InternationalAs at and
for the
year ended
December 31,
2016
(in millions,
except percentages)
Revenues (in NIS)1,548
ISP
Estimated market share44.0%
Churn rate20.4%
ILD
Estimated market share21.0%

 

ISP Services

 

In the Internet services sector Bezeq International provides a large variety of ISPInternet service provider (ISP) services tofor private and business customers, including requisite terminal equipment and support with an emphasis on broadband Internetover DSL based transmission, configuration and cable infrastructure. and access services ranging from 5 Mbps to 200 Mbpsthe Company's Internet infrastructure (as part of the wholesale market); hosting services offering site and server storage services at a designated installation, including value added services (such as monitoring and control); information security services; Internet and LAN network connection security using required terminal equipment or software, including monitoring; data services including international IP based on Bezeq’s ADSL infrastructuredata communication solutions for business customers with global deployment; and localhigh speed Wi-Fi services, including public hotspots.

Bezeq International provides these Internet services primarily via its exclusive wholly-owned Jonah submarine cable company infrastructure (HOT’s UFI). Such accessbetween Israel and Italy, launched in December 2011. Bezeq International is the only provider among ISPs operating in Israel to own a submarine cable.

International data services

Bezeq International provides international data communication solutions for business customers including customized global deployment. The services are offered in various bandwidthsprovided via Bezeq International's submarine cable and qualities of service based on available transmissions.the optic cables deployed from Israel to Europe over which Bezeq International also offershas long-term user rights, and through its business partnerships with leading global telecom providers such as British Telecom, which provide its customers a wide range of value-added services, including automatic online backup for personal computer files, antivirus, anti-spyware, anti-phishing, anti-spam, parental control over Internet use and premium technical support. Such value-added services are often provided as an integrated service package together with ISPaccess to their sophisticated global network services.

In addition to the foregoing services, Bezeq International offers packages of ISPITS licensees to provide Bezeq International's services and fixed-line broadband Internet infrastructure access servicesISP licensees the use of eitherits international capacities (through leasing or by purchasing indefeasible rights of use), over Bezeq or HOT.

ILD Services

InInternational's submarine cable, and the ILD services market, Bezeq International offersuser rights it acquired in European terrestrial infrastructures and in other international direct dialing services to business and private customers, toll-free number services for business customers overseas, international call routing and termination services (i.e., hubbing, the transfer of international calls between foreign communication providers worldwide), telephone card services enabling prepaid and postpaid dialing from Israel, and domestic telephony services by means of VoB access (a service that allows users to make and receive telephone calls over the Internet through an Internet connection) through its wholly owned subsidiary B.I.P. Communications Solutions Limited Partnership.networks.

 

Business Sector-Data Services and ICT

 

Bezeq International specializes in providing ITprovides ICT (Information and Communication Technology) solutions for business customers. Customer ICT solutions include extensive communications solutions such as server and web hosting services ("Hosting Services"), technical maintenance and support services, system and networking services, outsourcing and out-tasking services, security and risk management solutions, IP based services, cloud computing services, online backup services, market and advertising services for large localbusinesses over a digital platform (Bigger) and international enterprises, offering a wide range of services and comprehensive solutions that combine its communications network and the customer’s organizational computer infrastructures.equipment sales. Bezeq International offershas adopted a range of ICT services, including IT systems, computerized infrastructures, information security, networking and wireless and data back-up solutions, as well as maintenancecomprehensive solution model with a single contact person, fully responsible for organizational computer networks, help desks and IT expert outsourcing services. Bezeq International also provides its business customersdealing with international data networks, virtual private routed networks, or VPRN, and multiprotocol label switching, or MPLS, networks, and high-speed ISP services through a variety of broadband technologies, such as transmission, metro, ADSL, cables and WiFi.the customer (one service provider, one responsibility).

 

Bezeq International offersmarkets and maintains communication systems for the entire the Israeli market, and PBX exchanges, telephony networks and IP communications, mainly for its business customers services which allow for the upgrade and adjustmentcustomers. As part of such services to meet its customers’ ever- changing requirements, which is referred to byservice contracts, Bezeq International provides maintenance services for various PBX exchange manufacturers. These services are given for gateways, PBX exchanges and network end points (NEP) for lines used as “IT as a Service” (such as IT Infrastructure as a Service, cloud computingboth internal and data backup, virtual servers and cloud call centers).external lines.

 

Bezeq International’s customers also benefit from its advanced data centers, which supply website server hosting and co-location services as well as advanced disaster recovery solutions. Bezeq International operates large data centers and utilizes its international points-of-presence and global data network for the benefit of its international enterprise customers.

27

 

Bezeq International specializes in installing, maintaining and supporting internal organizational telephony exchanges, IP exchanges and call centers for some of the world’s leading manufacturers. In traditional international communications, Bezeq International utilizes a “Soft Switch” switching system that provides Intelligent Network services for international calls enabling cost-effective advanced monitoring and customer use restrictions.

Bezeq International also provides data services to ISPs and international communications providers through its submarine optical fiber communications cable system.

 

Multi-Channel Pay Television (DBS)

 

DBS offers nationwide coverage through its DTH technology and innovative and advanced technologies, including PVR, VOD and HD television. It is the only company in Israel licensed to provide multi-channel pay television broadcasts via satellite and is one of two companies in Israel licensed to provide multi-channel television services. DBS focuses on creating clear differentiation from its main competitor, HOT, with respect to brand, content and service quality. In addition, DBS has a strong track record of innovative technology development and is a leading provider of value-added services, including hybrid IP and DTH based set-top boxes (including PVR and VOD).

DBSAs at and
for the
year ended
December 31,
2016
(in millions,
except
percentages)
Revenues (in NIS)1,745
Estimated market share40.0%
Subscribers (in thousands)614
Churn rate15.9%

Broadcasts

VOD services

 

DBS currently offers a wide range of high quality content on 150 different channels, including 20 HD channels. Such channels include MTV, National Geographic, Discovery and Eurosport. DBS attempts to secure the best available programming across feature films, television series, documentary programming and original productions, while emphasizing both quality and ratings. DBS broadcasts new television series at a minimal delay in some cases, within hours from the time the content is originally aired in the United States or worldwide. DBS also has an agreement with HBO pursuant to which DBS broadcasts all of HBO’s new English language television series, the majority of which were only broadcast in Israel by DBS. DBS also offers a variety of local content as well asprovides VOD services pay-per-view channels, radio channels, music channelsfor its subscribers via the Internet, allowing user selectable content viewing. These services are provided for a service subscription fee, with additional charge for some of the content. Connecting to a service requires, among other things, certain types of decoders. In recent years, the number of DBS subscribers connected to VOD services and interactive services.the consumption of VOD services has increased significantly, inter alia, due to the increased supply of available content, increase in available band width at subscribers' homes and significant increase in use of advanced decoders.

 

29

Revenue of products and services

DBS’s package offerings include a basic package, which each subscriber is required to purchase, as well as additional channels chosen by the subscriber, whether as a package or as single and PPV channels. For example, DBS currently offers, among others, a sports channels package, an entertainment and series package, a movies channels package, a business and news channels package, a science and nature channels package, a youth and music channels package, a Russian language channels package and an Arabic language channels package.

The following table providescontains a breakdown of DBS Revenues (in NISDBS’ revenues (NIS in millions) during the last three years::

 

  2015  2014  2013 
Revenue from broadcasts and multi-channel television services to subscribers  1,774   1,708   1,617 
  2016  2015  2014 
Revenue from broadcasts and multi-channel television services to subscribers  1,715   1,748   1,708 
Percentage of revenue  98%*  99%*  99%*

 

Advanced Services

*  The revenues balance is mainly due to payments from channels to DBS offers its subscribers a variety of value-added services, which are among the most advanced in the world, including:

PVR set-top boxes which interface with DBS’s electronic program guide and enable special services, including ordering recordings in advance, recording series and pausing live broadcasts;

HD broadcasts through DBS’s set-top boxes;

VOD services via the Internet (accessed through the set-top boxes);

smartphone and tablet applications that offer viewing content as well as the option to remotely record content on the subscriber’s set-top box. At the beginning of 2010, DBS launched the option of viewing a variety of its content on iPhones and expanded the service to support iPads in March 2011. The iPad application incorporates viewing content at HD quality and connection to Facebook and both the iPad and iPhone applications offer the option to remotely record on the PVR;

“yes streamer,” a service that facilitates the viewing of video, pictures and music in diverse formats from the home computer on television (using DBS set-top boxes) in addition to access to certain Internet content, such as YouTube, Picasa, Flix and Flickr; and

“yes MultiRoom,” a service launched in June 2013 that allows subscribers to watch content that was recorded on one capable set-top box from other capable set-top boxes they have in other rooms using the home network.

These advanced services are available to subscribers through DBS’s set-top boxes, depending on the type of advanced service, which include “yes Max” (PVR capabilities and, in some of them, VOD capabilities), “HDvod” (HD and VOD capabilities) and “yes MaxTotal” (PVR, HD, VOD, streaming capabilities and yes MultiRoom in the same set-top box)for broadcasting their content. DBS also provides yesGo, a TV Everywhere feature that enables subscribers to watch a significant part of its content (both linear channels and VOD) via personal computers and mobile devices such as smartphones and tablets (available on iOS and Android).

 

Marketing, Sales and Customer Service

 

Under the structural separation limitations, each of the Bezeq Group companies maintains independent marketing and sales operations.

 

Domestic Fixed-Line Communications (Bezeq)

 

Bezeq has marketing, sales and service systems for its business and private customers, which include customer managers for the business sector, combined sales and service call centers around the country, technical support centers for private and business customers, Bezeq stores throughout Israel offering sales and services, as well as a virtual online shop.

 

Bezeq markets its services mainly through advertising in the mass media, telephone sales centers, customer managers and an array of independent dealers which are mainly ISPs, outsourced sales centers, and ISPs which, upon establishment of the wholesale market, mainly market end-to-end service packages based on Bezeq’s wholesale BSA services. Bezeq also has independent service and sales channels on its website (adapted to surfing from mobile phones), a dedicated application (Bezeq Sheli, My Bezeq), and also offers an Interactive Voice Response (IVR).

 

30

Cellular Telephony (Pelephone)

 

Pelephone's distribution system includes 28 service and sales centers dispersed throughout Israelthe country that provide customer service, sales, repair and customer retention services. ThisIn addition to the service centers, the distribution network is reinforced withby over 200 stores and point of sale standsstalls (some of which are operated by Pelephone employees, and otherssome by authorized dealers)certified resellers). In addition,As a rule, these dealers are paid a commission on sales.

During the course of the past year, Pelephone operatesincreased its distribution network and began, among other things, to market its services through an external sales' network.two large retail networks, at dozens of points of sale throughout the country.

 

Pelephone’s subscriber service network includes its website and 13 special purpose call centers which provide information and service regarding various matters in three languages, technical support, information regarding customer billing, value added services, sales and general information.

 

28

ISP, ILD, Data Services and ICT (Bezeq International)

 

Bezeq International’s quality of serviceInternational has sales channels for the private market, including customer recruitment and the professional support provided to its customers are key drivers of its success. Bezeq International’s customer services for its residential and business customers include designatedretention call centers, its website, different sociala country-wide direct sales network interfaces (such as Facebook)(providing "door to door" and an advanced setpoint of online web tools (such as chat, remote takeover software and advanced monitoring systems). Bezeq International’s ICT and VoB customers are also provided with fieldsale services), a technical support and installation services by trained technicians.

Bezeq International’scustomer service network and a distribution channel system that includes external marketing and advertising strategy highlights the importance of a smooth and fast Internet experience and emphasizes its unique value proposition as the best broadband Internet performance provider in Israel. For the private customerdealership centers. The business market Bezeq International uses a broad range of distribution channels to sell its products throughout Israel, including call centers for ISP and ILD services and sales agents who make door-to-door sales. In addition, Bezeq International offers joint services packages. For the business customer market, Bezeq International’s marketing channels include callcustomer recruitment centers and business and administration service and solution centers and customer managers according to customer type (SMB, SME customers designated for outsourcing transactions, etc.).business customers. The Company sells Bezeq International services as part of joint service bundles.

 

Multi-Channel Pay Television (DBS)

 

DBS customer service operations are carried out mainly by in-house and outsourced call centers, as well as by self-service via interactive voice response, DBS’s website and set-top boxes. Field technical support and installations are performed by DBS technicians and subcontractors.

 

DBS’s sales operations are carried out via door-to-door sales personnel, call centers and third party dealers. DBS focuses its marketing strategy on media campaigns with high presence on television as well as other medias such as radio, newspapers, Internet and billboard commercials, using well-known international actors and marketing special offers. DBS’s campaigns highlight its role as a global technology pioneer with leading value- added services (VOD, PVR, HD, yes MultiRoom, streamer and mobile applications). DBS also highlights its relationships with other well-known, popular brands.

 

Networks

 

Domestic Fixed-Line Communications (Bezeq)

 

Bezeq offers private and business customers, as well as communication providers, a wide variety of services through a nationally deployed, fully-owned, advanced communication networks. Bezeq was the first fixed-line communications company in the world to provide a national NGN deployment. Over the past four years, Bezeq has deployed thousands of street cabinets, equipped with MSAG systems containing ADSL2+ and VDSL2 cards, through which Bezeq supplies its customers with telephone services, Internet access, data and value-added services, all on a unified IP network. The thousands of street cabinets are fiber optically linked through a metro Ethernet network, reaching dozens of aggregation sites leading to Bezeq’s nationally distributed mega points of presence (POP) sites. The street cabinets are distributed in a manner by which the average distance from the customer does not exceed several hundred meters, enabling Bezeq to offer its customers, using VDLS2 technology, up to 100 Mbps bandwidth.

 

NGN network deployment and the transition to providing the array of services on a unified IP network has generated significant operational savings, by enabling Bezeq to gradually “shut down” the old PSTN network, as a result of which many structures that were formerly used to store the PSTN switches became redundant and are offered for sale upon removal of the PSTN switches (certain structures have already been sold) and following the removal of the copper cables in segments that were replaced by fiber optics.

 

Bezeq operates an extensive national network of optic fibers, providing relay and data communication services for business customers, government offices and security forces, as well as communication operators, while utilizing a wide variety of technologies, including SDH, metro Ethernet, IPVPN and more, with a wide variety of bandwidths. Bezeq recently began an initiative to extend the optical fiber network to be as close as possible to buildings and customer homes (FTTB/FTTH). This activity is expected to result in ultra-fast data transfer rates, significantly higher than the maximum rate provided on the current network (100 Mbps).

 

31

The data communication networks consist of thousands of switches and routers spread throughout hundreds of sites nationwide, as well as tens of thousands of kilometers of optical fiber, usually installed within duct infrastructures, enabling simple and rapid installation and maintenance. This array is deployed in a ring configuration, enhancing survivability.

 

Cellular Telephony (Pelephone)

Pelephone has a resilient and advanced network system in Israel, allowing it to offer its services with nationwide coverage and consistent high quality. Pelephone’s cellular telephony license is valid until September 8, 2022. During the years ended December 31, 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2015,2016, Pelephone had net capital expenditures of NIS 315321 million, NIS 321426 million and NIS 426241 million (approximately $109$63 million), respectively, for its network infrastructure.

 

Pelephone currently operates communications networks using the 4G LTE, UMTS/HSPA and CDMA technologies.

29

 

The 4G LTE technology is based on GSM standards. The advantages of this technology are greater data communication capacity and faster download rates than with the 3G technologies. All the terminal devices that support this technology also support the 3G technologies and the transition between the technologies is seamless.

 

UMTS/HSPA is a digital technology based on the GSM standard. This technology is globally widespread, and enables subscriber identification and services to be provided through a SIM card, which can be moved from one handset to another. The advantage of this technology, inter alia, is that it supports download speeds of up to 42 Mbps and upload speeds of up to 5.7 Mbps. This communication network is Pelephone's primary network.

 

CDMA digital technology is less prevalent worldwide than UMTS/HSPA and subscriber identification is via identification details burned onto the subscriber's terminal equipment rather than by means of a SIM card. To date,HSPA. At present, this network serves a limited number of subscribers who seldom useand Pelephone expects to cease operating this network in 2017, subject to the network. Sinceapproval of the UMTS/HSAP network was launched,Ministry of Communications. Pelephone is workingacting to transfer the existing CDMA network subscribers from CDMA to its UMTS/HSPA offering to upgrade their handsets toand LTE networks.

Pelephone’s networks cover substantially all of the new network.population in Israel. Pelephone is not expandingcontinuing to expand and improve the coverage, capacity and quality of its investment3.5G UMTS/HSPA+ network. Pelephone’s network architecture is based on two mobile telephone switching offices (MTSOs), each one with an IP based core network that can support all the traffic in this network beyond the needs of current maintenance.network.

 

At present, Pelephone's network the infrastructure is based onat two switch farms that are connected to more than 2,200 sites. Pelephone’s network is interconnected with the networks of Bezeq and HOT in several locations across Israel. Pelephone’s network is also connected to all of the cellular networks in Israel, the eight Israeli ILD operators, the fixed-line telephone network of Paltel and the cellular network of Wataniya, and indirectly to the cellular network of Jawwal in the Palestinian Authority.

 

Pelephone’s transmission network is made up of leased lines (fiber optic) from Bezeq and Pelephone’s own microwave links. Pelephone’s UMTS base stations are connected using a hybrid connection (ATM for voice calls through Bezeq’s SDH network and IP for data calls through Bezeq’s metro Ethernet network).

 

Pelephone’s networks cover substantially all of the population in Israel. Pelephone is continuing to expand and improve the coverage, capacity and quality of its 3.5G UMTS/HSPA+ network. Pelephone’s network architecture is based on two mobile telephone switching offices (MTSOs), each one with an IP based core network that can support all the traffic in the network.

In April 2014, Pelephone signed an agreement with Ericsson to upgrade its network center to support LTE, purchase and install radio equipment and implement additional adjustments to the network to support LTE. The equipment to be supplied to Pelephone will also support Advanced 4.5G LTE technology.

In September 2014, Pelephone signed a three-year framework agreement under which Ericsson will be Pelephone's exclusive supplier for expanding the deployment of the 4G LTE radio network. The agreement is an extension of the agreement signed in April 2014 for deploying the first stage of the network.

2014. The cost of establishing the network, including payments to Ericsson and additional costs linked to the deployment and adaptation of the network, is expected to amount to NIS 600 million through 2017, including NIS 96 million paid to acquire frequencies in a governmental auction. In addition, over the coming decade, Pelephone will be required to continue to establish new broadcasting sites, among other things, to comply with the terms of theits cellular license.

  

Under its cellular license and the Wireless Telegraph Ordinance, Pelephone has rights of use of frequencies in the 850 MHz spectrum ( CDMA network), the 850 MHz and 2100 MHz spectrums (UMTS/HSPA network), and in the15 MHz of bandwidth within 1800 MHz spectrum ( LTE technology network). Pelephone was awarded its bandwidth within the 1800 MHz spectrum after participating in a government tender in 2015.

32

 

Ministry of Communications policy concerning infrastructure sharing

Pursuant to the recommendations of an inter-ministerial team established by the Ministry of Communications in May 2014, the Ministry published a “Policy for sharing broadband access networks belonging to holders of a general license, for providing mobile radio telephone services,” or the Policy Paper.

The main points of the Policy Paper are:

The Ministry of Communications encourages and will continue to encourage the active sharing of network sites and masts, as well as the active sharing of antennas, among all operators.
In general, the Ministry of Communications believes that in order to streamline the frequency spectrum, the active sharing of antennas, frequencies and radio equipment (multi-operator core network (MOCN)) is preferable to active sharing of antennas and radio equipment without the sharing of frequencies (multi-operator radio access network (MORAN)). However, the Ministry did not rule out the possibility that under special circumstances it would consider it appropriate to approve a MORAN agreement, if requested.
In general, the Ministry of Communications will allow the sharing of transmission from cellular sites to centralized radio-based stations in a bandwidth-sharing configuration, nonetheless, under exceptional conditions, and at the Ministry’s discretion, it may allow sharing of transmission from the cellular sites to centralized radio-based stations as well.
When reviewing individual network-sharing agreements, the Ministry of Communications will take into account the considerations specified in the Policy Paper with regard to four key aspects: (i) the existing level of competition and the potential for harm to the competition; (ii) the existing and expected inventory of frequencies and how efficiently they are being used: (iii) the survivability and redundancy of the networks from the national perspective; and (iv) ensuring the level of telecommunications services over time.
Based on the foregoing, the Ministry outlined guidelines for examining each individual network-sharing agreement submitted for its approval, which provide, among other things, that MOCN-based sharing will not be allowed for two cellular operators with fully deployed 3G networks, but may be considered regarding a new operator with a partially deployed 3G network with an established operator with a fully deployed 3G network, and that the Ministry will allow MOCN-based sharing, provided that at least three independent wireless access networks are being operated in every region in Israel. Other conditions are also prescribed in the Policy Paper.
The Ministry of Communications does not intend to permit any sharing of radio infrastructure, including shared transmission to radio base stations, between Bezeq Group and HOT Group, which are the only owners of fixed-line infrastructure in Israel.
The Minister of Communications will consider revoking all or some of the network sharing approvals, depending on the circumstances, if it appears that the level of competition, coverage or customer service is harmed.

Infrastructure sharing agreements and providing right of use of networks

Partner - HOT Mobile

To the best of Pelephone's knowledge the following active radio segment network sharing agreements are in effect:

HOT – Mobile.

In April 2015According to the radio segment network sharing agreement between Partner and HOT Mobile, announced that the Minister of Communications had approved their agreement to establish a partnership for maintaining, developing and operating a single state-of-the-art cellular network for both companies, in which each company will hold an equal part. Subsequent to the foregoing approval, Partner and HOT Mobile set upestablished a joint company that receivedobtained a special license to provide cellularfor providing radio infrastructure services to a MVNO operator. This license is validoperator, for 10 years. The purpose of the company, which is owned by Partner and HOT Mobile in equal shares, is to maintain and develop one advanced cellular network for both companies and to operate the radio segment jointly.

 

CellcomElectra - Golan Telecom – Cellcom

. In 2014, Cellcom announced that it hadJanuary 2017 an agreement was signed by the shareholders of Golan Telcom and Electra Commodities Ltd., or Electra, for the acquisition of Golan Telcom shares. At the same time, Golan Telcom entered into a 4G network active radio segment sharing agreement with Golan Telecom that had been hosted on Cellcom's network sinceCellcom for its establishment. This3G and 4G networks and for hosting services for its 2G network. The acquisition transaction and sharing agreement is in addition to the agreement to provide usage rights on Cellcom’s 2G and 3G networks, which was entered into in December 2013. These agreements are subject to the approvals ofwere approved by the Ministry of Communications and the Antitrust Commissioner. Cellcom’sAccording to an announcement also noted that it is continuing its efforts to implement network sharing, includingby Electra, once the sharing agreement between Cellcom and Electra has been approved, Golan Telecom will no longer be considered to have not complied with the terms of its license with regard to the passive components atgeographic deployment, as required by the cellular sites.Ministry of Communications.

 

 3330 

 

 

Cellcom - Marathon 018.In March 2015 the Minister of Communications announced that the infrastructureJuly 2016, a network sharing agreements betweenagreement was signed by Cellcom and Golan Telecom require essential amendments beforeMarathon 018 for the 4G network radio segment and for providing the right of use of Cellcom’s 2G and 3G networks. The agreement was approved by Antitrust Commissioner and Ministry of Communications would re-examineCommunications. This agreement increases the agreements in detail.

number of infrastructure owning operators to six.

 

In November 2015, Cellcom announced that it had entered into an agreement to purchase 100% of the shares of Golan Telecom for NIS 1.17 billion. In March 2016, the Israeli Antitrust commissioner informed Cellcom that it is considering opposing the current terms of the proposed purchase of Golan Telecom.

Pelephone - Cellcom

In September 2014, Pelephone entered into a collaboration agreement with Cellcom for the maintenance of passive components at the cellular sites owned by the two companies, which is expected to reduce maintenance costs at these sites. The agreement provides for maintenance of the shared sites through a supplier that will be selected by Pelephone and Cellcom. The supplier, which will be chosen through a tender, will sign separate agreements with Pelephone and Cellcom for a period of at least 5 years.

In July 2015, the Antitrust Commissioner determined that the foregoing arrangement is exempt from the conditions for approval of a restrictive agreement. Pelephone and Cellcom have not yet commenced their collaboration. At present, Pelephone is reviewing a project that would lower the maintenance costs of the passive components by using its own employees.

The infrastructure sharing model provides potential for reducing the costs for establishing and ongoing operation of the network. Consequently, if Pelephone does not receive permissionparty to operate under any network sharing model, the costsagreement. The inventory of Pelephone’sfrequencies available for its network are likely tomay be highersmaller than those of some of its main competitors.

MVNO - Mobile Virtual Network Operator

Furthercompetitors and could allow it less flexibility in managing its networks and require it to the government's decisionfind alternative solutions in order to encourage competition in the cellular market, several MVNO licenses were grantedbe able to virtual operators. Only a few holders of MVNO licensees operate in the private market, which is dominated by Rami Levy. In October 2015, Pelephone completed the acquisition of a MVNO operator, Alon Cellular Ltd. Some of Alon Cellular's subscribers were hosted on Pelephone's network. As part of the acquisition, Pelephone gained approximately 70,000 new subscribers.

In June 2014, the Ministry of Communications announced that there will be a hearing regarding the ruling that in hosting agreements drawn up between cellular operators and MVNOs, the cellular operators may not demand hosting tariffs that are higher than the lowest tariff given to business customers in cellular agreements. Pelephone submitted its objection to this ruling.

Amendments to Cellular Licenses (Consumer Related)

In February 2016, the Ministry of Communications announced that it is proposing 41 amendments to the cellular companies' licenses, all related to consumer relations. Pelephone is reviewing the various issues arising from the proposed amendments and their ramifications.provide competitive services.

 

Construction and Operation of Sites: Permits, Licenses.

Once a new coverage area has been identified, Pelephone’s technical staff determines the optimal base station location and the required coverage characteristics. The area is then surveyed to identify network sites. In urban areas, typical sites are building rooftops. In rural areas, masts are usually constructed. Technical staffs also identify the best means of connecting the base station to the network. Once a preferred site has been identified and the exact equipment configuration for that site decided, Pelephone begins the process of obtaining necessary approvals.

 

The construction and changing of most of these network sites requires building permits from local or regional authorities, as well as a number of additional permits from governmental and regulatory authorities, such as construction and operating permits from the Ministry of Environmental Protection, permits from the Civil Aviation Authority, in certain cases, and permits from the Israeli Defense Forces.

 

Pelephone uses software and computer systems, some under purchased licenses and others which were developed by Pelephone's IT department. Many of these licenses are limited in time, and are periodically renewed. The primary systems used by Pelephone are: Oracle Application ERP system and Amdocs customer management and billing system.

 

34

ISP, ILD, Domestic Services and ICT (Bezeq International)

 

In December 2011, Bezeq International completed the deployment of a new high-speed submarine optical fiber communications cable system connecting Israel and Europe, which was launched in January 2012 and has increased bandwidth (capacity and speed) at affordable rates and positioned Bezeq as the sole Internet service provider in Israel to own and operate such infrastructure. This high-speed optical fiber system named JONAH, covers 2,300 kilometers across the Mediterranean, is fully redundant (i.e., utilizes two equipped fiber pairs) and leverages Alcatel-Lucent’s advanced submarine communications networking technology. The cable system can operate at 100 gigabits-per-second data transmissions to enable data capacity of over 7.0 Tbps between Tel Aviv and Bari, Italy. This ultimate data capacity could allow the simultaneous download of 100,000 MP3 files in one minute and the streaming of 15,000 HDTV channels. The system integrates Alcatel-Lucent OALC-5 cable, optimized with coherent submarine fiber (CSF), repeaters and the 1620 Light Manager submarine line terminal which is designed to accommodate 10G/40G/100G wavelengths in the same platform, enabling seamless capacity upgrades on a flexible grid for channel spacing without traffic interruption. This solution, which features advanced optical coherent technology, offers a pathway to multi-terabit capacity using 100G channels, far exceeding the maximum capacity achievable with 40G. This protects the investment from the risk of obsolescence or capacity limitations due to changes in transmission technology. Bezeq International’s submarine optical fiber communications cable is extended from Bari terrestrially through Interoute’s network to major European cities such as London, Frankfurt and Milan.

 

In parallel with the completion of the deployment of JONAH in the fourth quarter of 2011, Bezeq International invested in the purchase of a submarine fiber pair connecting Israel to Cyprus, known as the ARIEL cable, which extends to Marseilles, France via the ALEXANDROS submarine cable. In addition, Bezeq International holds multiple 10Gbps capacity indefeasible rights of use via the MedNautilus submarine cable system.

 

Bezeq International’s capacity on the JONAH, ARIEL and MedNautilus submarine cables allows the delivery of faster connectivity to Israel and the Mediterranean region, fostering the delivery of innovative IP-based services for which capacity and speed are critical elements to meet end-users’ demand. Bezeq International is the only telecom operator in Israel that provides three different routes of multiple 10Gbps to Europe.

 

In July 2014, Bezeq International launched the “Bigger" service for the business sector in which it offers an innovative digital platform for managing the marketing and advertising of small and medium size businesses.

 

PBX services

Bezeq International markets and maintains communication systems for the entire Israeli market, and PBX exchanges, telephony networks and IP communications, mainly for its business customers. As part of its service contracts, Bezeq International provides maintenance services for various PBX exchange manufacturers. These include services for gateways, PBX exchanges and network end points (NEP) for lines used as both internal and external lines.

 

31

The following table provides a breakdown of Bezeq International’s revenue (in NIS(NIS in millions) over the last three years:

 

 2015  2014  2013  2016  2015  2014 
Voice services  379   395   401   325   379   395 
% of total revenue  24.02%  26.26%  27.98%  20.99%  24.02%  26.26%
Revenue from business Internet and telecommunication services (ISP, PBX, ICT, data)  1,199   1,109   1,032   1,223   1,199   1,109 
% of total revenue  75.98%  73.74%  72.02%  79.01%  75.98%  73.74%
Total revenue  1,578   1,504   1,433   1,548   1,578   1,504 

 

The following table provides a breakdown of revenue to private and business customers (in NIS(NIS in millions) over the last three years:

 

 2015  2014  2013  2016  2015  2014 
Revenue from private customers  555   529   535   570   555   529 
Revenue from business customers  1,023   975   898   978   1,023   975 
Total revenue  1,578   1,504   1,433   1,548   1,578   1,504 

35

Multi-Channel Pay Television (DBS)

 

DBS is the sole DTH provider in Israel. DBS uses space segments from the Amos 2 and Amos 3 satellites, operated by Spacecom. DBS is currently using 12 space segments (ten space segments on Amos 2 and two space segments on Amos 3). In November 2013, DBS entered into an agreement with Spacecom, extending the leases for space segments leased on the Amos 2, Amos 3 and Amos 6 satellites or another satellite to be agreed between the parties, until the end of 2028.

DBS operates a hybrid platform of satellite and IPTV OTT. DBS’s IP platform, based on progressive download technology, enables DBS to provide its VOD service, which was launched in March 2010 using OTT technology, with a versatile and user friendly interface in HD quality incorporated into the electronic program guide.

As of December 31, 2015, DBS offers 150 television channels including 20 HD channels transmitted over 12 space segments (36 MHz each) on Amos 2 and 3. The main uplink site in Kfar Saba transmits content over eight carriers, while the secondary site of RRsat Global Communications Network Ltd., or RRsat, transmits content over four space segments. Up to six transport-streams can be transferred from the main site of DBS to its secondary site and be uplinked from RRsat. Ten transport-streams are transmitted using MPEG2 and DVB-S parameters and the two HD transport-streams are transmitted using MPEG4 and DVB-S2 standards.

 

DBS owns the satellite dishes and other endpoint devices that carry and receive the signals from such satellites to subscriber residences and set- top boxes. In addition, DBS leases some of the set-top boxes and cards that decode the coded signals received from the satellite to its subscribers, while other set-top boxes and cards are provided to subscribers for a deposit (an immaterial number of set-top boxes are sold to subscribers).

 

Additionally, DBS offers an extensive VOD library based on an OTT content solution, making it accessible to all households with an Internet connection with bandwidth of at least 2.5 Mbps. The VOD platform is comprised of transport- streams which reside in DBS’s data center and components which reside in two points of presence (“POPs”) of two ISPs.

Competition in the Israeli Telecommunications Market

 

The telecommunicationscommunications industry around the world and in Israel has developed rapidlyis characterized by rapid development and frequent changes in technologies, the business structure of the industry and applicable regulation. Below is a description of the main trends and central characteristics of the communications industry in recent years, bothwhich have significantly affected the technologyoperations of the Bezeq Group as a whole.

Recently, the competition in the communications industry, particularly in cellular telephony, has been fierce (with the entry of the operators HOT Mobile and regulations governing the industry,Golan Telecom), with packages consisting of several services and is expected to continue to undergo significant changes. Aspackages for a result of consolidation in recent years,fixed price with unlimited use are offered. This stronger competition has become concentratedbrought down prices, increased customer switching, led to a decline in the use of fixed-line telephony minutes, and higher churn rates, which in turn has affected the Bezeq Group's results. Implementation of the wholesale market has also intensified competition in the Internet service packages and enhanced implementation of wholesale services may lead to even fiercer competition and customer switching. In the business sector, the competition by competing communications groups is strengthening, which is also expressed in participation and award of tenders. To reduce the impact on performance, the Bezeq Group companies are introducing streamlining and other measures to improve the services they provide and differentiate themselves from their competitors.

Considering the diversity of the Bezeq Group's communication operations, regulatory developments could, in certain cases, have different effects on different areas of operation in the Bezeq Group, meaning that changes in regulation that adversely affect one area, could potentially have a positive effect on another area. In certain cases, opposing effects on the areas of operation might be offset one against the other at the Group level.

32

Communications groups in the Israeli market

Recently, the market is characterized by competition among large telecommunicationthe communications groups operating in most, if notseveral segments with the aim of providing a solution for all of the segments ofcustomer's communications requirements, as indicated in the telecommunications market. The Israeli telecommunications market is dominated by four main groups, the Bezeq Group, the following table:

Group
Activity
Bezeq Group companiesCellcom (a)Partner (b)HOT (c)
Cellular telephonyPelephoneVVV
Fixed-line telephonyBezeq
Bezeq International
VVV
Internet services
(fixed-line / cellular)

Bezeq

Pelephone

Bezeq International

V

VV
International callsBezeq InternationalVVV
Multi-channel televisionDBSV-V

Cellcom Group - to the HOT Group and the Partner Group, eachbest of which have interests in some or all of the main telecommunications segments in Israel.

Cellcom Group. TheBezeq's knowledge, Cellcom Group provides communications services through Cellcom and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Netvision. These companies provide cellular telephony services (including cellular Internet),services; fixed-line telephony services (mainly to business customers) through Cellcom’son its own infrastructure, and fixed-line telephony services using VoB technology, transmission and data communication services for business customers through Cellcom’sCellcom's own transmission network, ISP services, andend-to-end ISP service packages, wholesale service-based Internet infrastructure, international telecommunication services, fixed-line telephony services. In December 2014, Cellcom launchedservices using VoB technology; an Internet-based television (OTT) service which includes VOD services, Internet contentseveral linear channels, and the integration of the Idan+ channels.

 

HOT Group. The HOTPartner Group provides communications services through HOT and its wholly-owned subsidiaries HOT Mobile, HOT Net and HOT Telecom. The HOT- to the best of Bezeq's knowledge, Partner Group owns a cable infrastructure deployed nationwide and provides multi-channel cable television services, as well as fixed-line telephony services, cellular telephony services, transmission and data-communications services, ISP services, and transmission and data communications services.

HOT provides a range of communication services and interactive applications over itsend-to-end ISP service packages, wholesale service-based Internet infrastructure, which is deployed throughout Israel. This network is the principal alternative to Bezeq's infrastructure in the private sector. The upgrading of the infrastructure and the service bundles marketed by the HOT Group, and the Ministry of Communication’s decision regarding the cancellation of NDSL services, increased the level of competition. The HOT Group is subject to limitations of structural separation which are generally less stringent than those that apply to the Bezeq Group. While HOT was compelled to provide wholesale services, including BSA services, it does not yet actually provide them.

Competition from ISPs and Telecommunication Companies

The operation of the wholesale market enables ISPs and telecommunication companies (holders of a single license) to offer customers service bundles that include also Internet infrastructure based on the infrastructures and services of Bezeq (in exchange for supervised tariffs that will be paid by the telecommunication providers to Bezeq).

Competition from the Partner Group

The Partner Group provides communications services through Partner and its wholly-owned subsidiary, 012 Smile, which provide cellular telephony services (including cellular Internet), fixed-line telephony, transmission and data communications, ISP services, international call services and fixed-line telephony services using VoB technology.

 

36

Internet

In April 2015,HOT Group - to the best of Bezeq's knowledge, Hot Group owns a network sharing agreement was signed between Partnernationwide cable infrastructure and HOT Mobile. Partner and HOT Mobile subsequently established a joint company that received a special license to provideprovides multi-channel television services, cellular radio infrastructuretelephony services, to a cellular operator. The Antitrust Commission's approval was granted with conditions stipulating that HOT Telecom will refrain from limiting or blocking the option given to customers to use any service or application provided on the Internet at any time, directly or indirectly, including by setting rates or through technology, and that HOT Telecom'sfixed-line telephony services, Internet infrastructure, transmission and data communications services, will be sold and supplied under equal terms to all its customers, whether they purchase additional communication services from HOT or not.IPS services. Certain structural separation restrictions were imposed on Hot Group and specific restriction on marketing joint service bundles that include ISP services.

 

Other operators inAdditional competitors that do not belong to the market includeabove communications groups (such as Golan Telecom, MVNO cellular operators, international operators and ISPs, including service providers in the wholesale market) also operate in the market.

 

Recently,The competition between the communications groups is reflected by increased use of "service bundles" (packages includingservice bundles (including various combinations of several different communication services) has increased.. Communications groups market or are likely tomay in future market in the future, "joint" service bundles consisting of different communication services of the companies in each group. As a rule, the marketing of the joint bundlesbundle enables the communications group to offer its customers tariffs that are more attractive tariffs than purchasing each service separately (in some cases with "cross-subsidization" among the bundle's components), and a totalcomprehensive solution that does away with the need for subscribers to use a numberbe subscribed of several different providers. These trends are strengtheningwere reinforced with implementation of a wholesale BSA services that allowservice, which allows operators that do not own infrastructure and operatorsthose that are not part of a communications group to offer a full end-to-end service packagebundle (including infrastructure) to their customers.

Unlike the other communications groups, at the date of this report, Bezeq Group is currently subject to the stricter restrictions described below.in marketing joint service bundles.

Provision of comprehensive services that meet a range of needs for the customer has become easier due to the technological unity trend, regulatory changes, and the transition to regulation through a consolidated business license that was granted to different communications operators, as part of which different communication services that in the past required separate licenses may be provided under the same license.

Fixed-Line Telephony Services Market

Wholesale market

 

The convergencewholesale market enables communications providers to compete with Bezeq while using its physical infrastructure, including infrastructure segments, and its services, at controlled prices that are not set by Bezeq. The wholesale market allows communications providers to offer their subscribers broadband services and end-to-end service packages, including access infrastructure.

33

To the best of Bezeq's knowledge, HOT does not yet provide wholesale services in the absence of a price set by the Ministry of Communications. On January 14, 2016, the Ministry of Communications published a hearing to determine the maximum tariffs for wholesale services on HOT's network.

Telephony

Bezeq estimates that at the end of 2016, its market share in the fixed-line telephony market was approximately 55% of the private sector and 73% of the business sector, a 1% decrease compared with 2015 in each of the markets. The is significant competition in the fixed-line communications segment.

Bezeq and HOT Telecom both own nationally-deployed fixed-line telephony infrastructures and are in fierce competition with each other, which is manifested, among other things, by HOT combining Internet infrastructure, telephony and cable television, and possibly cellular services as well, to households. HOT also markets telephony services to business customers.

Bezeq also faces competition from license-holders for domestic fixed-line communication services, including VoB, which provide the service on Bezeq's broadband access service, including the wholesale BSA service.

Competition in telephony from the cellular companies

The penetration rate of cellular telephony in Israel is among the highest in the world. In the opinion of Bezeq, this penetration rate combined with low airtime rates on an international scale and large-scale bundles of minutes at fixed monthly prices have made the cellular telephone a product that largely substitutes for the landline telephone. Bezeq believes that a deepening of the substitution of fixed lines by mobile lines is one of the causes of the reduction in the average traffic per line, and of the growing removal rate of telephone lines.

In 2016, the trends that began in 2012 continued, marking a leap in competition in the cellular communications market in Israel. The activity of the new infrastructure operators, Golan and HOT Mobile, and to a lesser extent the activity of virtual cellular operators, continued the trend of erosion of prices and maintained the high level of mobility of customers between the companies. However, the continuation of these trends has strengthened duea minor effect on the fixed-line operation compared with previous years, and since 2015 there has been a decrease in the average movement per line and in the rate of removal of fixed telephone lines.

Partner and Cellcom also provide domestic fixed-line services through companies they own, and they sell service bundles that combine fixed-line and cellular telephony and Internet services.

VoC services

According to the Ministry of Communications policy, VoC service is a fixed service, the provision of which will be regulated by a general Domestic Carrier License or special license that currently provide VOB services, since VOB or VoC telephony services are telephony services which use IP technology over another entity's data transmission network (irrespective of whether such network is mobile or fixed) and it is therefore a single fixed service.

As a result of the Ministry of Communications' decision that provides an exemption to cellular operators from requiring a general license or a permit to set up and operate access points, the cellular operators can use Wi-Fi access points as part of their networks to provide services. This provides them with a transition to providing cellular telephony services over a Wi-Fi network and assists in diverting loads to this network from their cellular network.

Internet infrastructure segment

Bezeq estimates that at the end of 2016 its market share in the Internet infrastructure market was approximately 69% (compared with 68% at the end of 2015). There is significant competition in this field.

Competition from HOT Group – HOT's Internet infrastructure is deployed nationwide, and a range of communication services and interactive applications can be provided. On September 28, 2016, the Advisory Committee that was appointed in accordance with the Communications (Telecommunications and Broadcasts) (Advisory Committee) Regulations, 2011, submitted a recommendation to the Minister of Communication'sCommunications to postpone the date for implementing its decision of November 17,13, 2014 with respect to allow unified general license holdersdeployment of HOT Telecom’s infrastructure by one year to November 13, 2017. The advisory committee also recommended that HOT be required no later than December 31, 2016 to provide its services to all subscribers on OTT technology on broadband Internet (which in practice belongs to Bezeq) in all the communities in which it does not currently provide services. HOT will start using Bezeq's physical infrastructure on October 1, 2017 at prices to be determined.

This network is currently the main alternative to Bezeq's infrastructures in the private sector. The upgrading of the infrastructure and the service bundles marketed by the HOT Group increased the level of competition in the Internet segment. HOT was obligated to provide wholesale services, previously provided under specialist domestic carrier, mobile virtual network operator (MVNO), international service, ISP service and NEP service licenses under their unified general license. Accordingincluding BSA services, but to the decision, communicationsbest of Bezeq's knowledge, it does not yet actually provide them.

34

Competition from ISPs and telecommunication groups holding more than one MVNO, international services, special general domestic carrier licenses, or a unified license may apply to obtain- operating the wholesale market enables ISPs and telecommunication companies (holders of a single licenselicense) to offer customers service bundles that also include Internet infrastructure based on Bezeq's infrastructures and services (in exchange for controlled tariffs to be paid by the group of services, unlesstelecommunication providers to Bezeq). Moreover, if and insofar as the Ministry approvesmechanism for preventing a deviation from this principle. Unified licenses have been granted'margin squeeze' is implemented, similar to an increasing number of operators, including 013 Netvision, Xfone, Golan Telecom, Cellcom Fixed Line Communication and Partner Fixed-Line Communication Solutions.

In August 2014, Pelephone launched a LTE network to provide LTE technology 4G services using a 5 MHz frequency bandwidth within the 1800 MHz spectrum it received fromone described in the Ministry of Communications.Communications hearing, Bezeq's ability to market promotional offers of its wholesale services will also suffer, in terms of both time to market and prices at which the services are offered.

 

In January 2015, Pelephone participatedCompetition from cellular operators – The cellular companies have deepened their Internet activities on the cellular range both in the private sector and in the business sector. Unlike the fixed-line communications segment (where the provision of access infrastructure services – by HOT, is separate from provision of Internet access services – by the ISP), the cellular Internet service is provided as one unit. Surfing services are provided both from the cellular handset and through a governmental tender forcellular modem that connects laptop and desktop computers in combination with Internet access services. The capacity of cellular networks have increased substantially due to the allocationrise in popularity of 4G (LTE) frequencies. Underservices. However, Bezeq believes that the tender, Pelephone received 15 MHz within the 1800 MHz spectrum. The frequency allocation was issued in August 2015. Pursuant to the provisionsmigration of the tender, receipt of a license forcellular operators to 4G in 2015 did not change the frequencies is contingent upon an amendment to the existing license. Under the license amendment, the requirements regarding deploymentinterchangeability between cellular Internet and quality of service through the 4G network are more stringent as compared with the previous standards. Further deployment of the network is currently underway.fixed-line Internet.

 

New Fixed-Line Infrastructure Company.Competition from Israel Broadband Company Ltd. In August 2013, Israel Broadband Company Ltd., or IBC, a telecommunications joint venture between the government-owned IECgovernment owned Israel Electric Corporation and a consortium of non-governmentnon-governmental companies, that was selected by the IEC in a tender procedure, was granted a general license for the provision ofto provide telecommunications infrastructure services (including data services, digital transmissions and VPN) via fiber optic networks to telecommunicationtelecommunications service providers. IBC is deploying a fiber-optic infrastructure to provide Internet services providers.over the electrical grid, and has started operating commercially in several cities. According to media reports, the volume of subscribers enlisted by IBC is not material.

Pursuant to the provisions of the license, IBC was obligated to make a gradual universal deployment over a period of 20 years. IBC was granted a special license (which does not impose a universal obligation) to provide domestic fixed data-communication services, according to which it is entitled to provide IPVPN services and broadband data-communication lines.

To the best of Bezeq's knowledge, the joint holdings of IBC (other than IEC's holdings) are for sale. On June 21, 2016, a Ministry of Communications announcement was published whereby communications companies that have no fixed-line infrastructure (Cellcom and Partner) were granted permission to compete for investment in IBC and in parallel, Partner informed the Ministry of Communications that it intends to deploy optical fibers. According to the license, IBC will enter into an agreementannouncement, these measures are designed to open the fixed-line market (in which Bezeq has a monopoly) to competition, with the emphasis on infrastructure upgrading. However, under the Arrangements Law, Bezeq was obligated to allow IEC to use the IEC’s fiber optic network in Israel to provide such wholesale products to telecommunication services providers. If IBC is successful, it would compete with Bezeq and HOT in the wholesale market, as well as providing such services directly to large business customers. IBC has begun operating in several cities and announced its intention to begin operating in additional cities in 2015. The number of IBC subscribers is currently insubstantial.physical infrastructure.

 

Fixed-Line Telephony Services MarketTransmission and data communications

 

The fixed-lineIn addition to Bezeq, other companies operating in this segment are Cellcom, Partner, HOT and Internet companies that also use leased infrastructures. To the best of Bezeq's knowledge, Cellcom has deployed and set up a transmission network which it uses for its own needs and for competition with Bezeq's services in the transmission and data communications market. Partner also provides transmission and data communication services combined with telephony and Internet to business customers.

Other potentially competing infrastructures

In addition to HOT's cable and optical fiber network and the optical fiber infrastructures of Cellcom and Partner, there are currently a number of infrastructures in Israel with the potential to serve as communications infrastructures, which are based on optical fibers and are mostly owned by government companies and entities, such as Israel Electric Corporation, or IEC, Israel Railways, Mekorot Israel National Water Co., Petroleum & Energy Infrastructures Ltd., and the Cross Israel Highway Ltd. Some municipalities are also trying to create an alternative to installation of pipes or fibers by deploying their own infrastructures.

In recent years this segment has been characterized by a decline in demand, and in prices in recent years. The decline in demandwhich is reflected in the declinedecrease in the numberrate of existingownership of fixed telephone lines and in a gradual erosion of the number of calls originating in fixed-line networks. Bezeq believes that this trend isstems primarily due tofrom the rise in the number of cellular subscribers and the volumein view of use of cellular telephones in the comprehensive call-minute packages the cellular companies have marketedmarket extensively overin recent years and the last few yearsdecrease in prices in the segment (Bezeq estimates that 80% of all calls originate in the cellular network), and from an increase in VoIP calls. In 2015,2016, the number of Bezeq fixedBezeq’s lines declined by about 0.1%3% (compared with a decline of 0.5%1% in the number of lines in 2014)2015). Likewise, the number of call minutes (incoming and outgoing) declined by 7%8% on Bezeq’sBezeq's fixed telephone lines compared with 2014.2015. The average monthly revenue per phone line declineddecreased by approximately 5%4%.

 

 3735 

 

 

Fixed-line telephony is characterized by a lively competitive dynamic. Bezeq's competitors are HOT Telecom and VoB service providers which have been operating under license for several years with no obligation to provide universal services, and without their own independent access infrastructure. Some of them compete with Bezeq as part of telecommunications groups, and Bezeq believes that the cellular companies are also its competitors in the telephony segment. Bezeq estimates that if a decision is made to implement the hearing regarding the wholesale telephony in the resale format, service providers with a unified license that are permitted to provide domestic fixed-line services without any infrastructure to BSA service subscribers will compete with Bezeq.

The Internet segment is characterized by high rates of penetration, which is attributable to the deployment of a national access infrastructure. Bezeq’s main competitor in fixed-line telephony. this segment is HOT. Upon implementation of a wholesale market, ISPs compete with Bezeq in providing service packages, including broadband Internet access infrastructure using Bezeq's infrastructures, at wholesale prices. Bezeq is also exposed to competition from the cellular companies.

In additionthe wholesale service segment, HOT competes with Bezeq as an infrastructure owner compelled to provide wholesale services, although these services have not yet been provided by HOT.

In the transmission and data-communications segment, Bezeq competes mainly with HOT Telecom, Cellcom and Partner, which operate as communications groups and provide a full communications solution to customers. These companies can compete with Bezeq by using its physical infrastructure. HOT fixed-line telephony services can also be purchased from providers of VoB services (a service that allows users to make and receive telephone calls over the Internet through an Internet connection)Telecom will begin using Bezeq’s on October 1, 2017).

 

The fixed-line telephonyCompetition in the industry depends on a number of factors, such as regulatory decisions, possible changes in the terms of the licenses of Bezeq and the subsidiaries, and in the terms of the licenses of their competitors, mergers and joint ventures between companies that compete with the Group companies, the possible repercussions of the Market Concentration Law, further development of the wholesale market, in Israel is also characterized by:the lack of symmetry between the ability of Bezeq and the competitors to provide a comprehensive service, the new services that Bezeq will be permitted to provide, the tariff policy, cancellation of the structural separation, the extent of flexibility granted to Bezeq when offering unbundleable service bundles, including with subsidiaries, and technological developments.

Pricing Pressure: The price erosion experienced in recent years has been partly driven by a reduction in termination rates and the increase in competition, including from cellular telephony operators that introduced unlimited packages in 2012, resulting in the decline of fixed- line telephony average revenue per line in Bezeq and HOT’s networks.

Commoditization:In recent years, fixed-line telephony services have been largely commoditized and uptake has become increasingly dependent on a quality broadband Internet offering by the same provider, or the overall attractiveness of the bundled offerings, which, mainly in the case of bundles offered by Bezeq’s competitors, may combine fixed-line telephony with one or more of broadband Internet access, cellular telephony and pay television services. However, while usage of fixed-line telephony is declining, high penetration rates of fixed line telephony services are being maintained.

Growing Enterprise Data Services: The enterprise segment has shown an increase in consumption of transmission and data communications services that have partially compensated for the overall decline in fixed- line telephony usage.

Technology Convergence between Communications Systems: The transition to solutions based on IP protocol promotes technology convergence between the different communications systems and penetration of integrated products, facilitating various communications solutions on one handset (e.g. cellular and fixed-line telephony on one handset).

 

Internet Access-Infrastructure and ISP Services

 

Internet service in Israel is structured into two separate elements comprised of infrastructure, or network access services, and ISP services. Infrastructure access service relates to access to the physical network infrastructure within Israel that is required to connect the customer’s device to the infrastructure access service provider. This service is provided exclusively by Bezeq and HOT, the only telecommunications operators in Israel that own a national fixed-line network infrastructure. ISP services, which can be provided by any licensed provider, consist of providing customers access to the local and global Internet network utilizing the infrastructure of Bezeq or HOT. ISPs generally also provide certain value-added services such as data protection services, security solutions, e-mail services and system administration services. Accordingly, a customer wishing to subscribe to Internet services in Israel effectively must purchase both fixed-line broadband Internet infrastructure access services and ISP services and retains the choice with regards to the provider of each service.

Fixed-Line Broadband Internet Infrastructure Access Services Market

The number of subscribers inIn the Internet segment, growth has continued to growbeen recorded in recent years.years in terms of number of subscribers. The Internet segment is characterized by a rise in surfing speeds and the adoption of advanced services and value-added applications. In 2015,2016, there was a 4% increase in the number of fixed-line Internet subscribers in Israel. Furthermore, the Internet segment is characterized by an increase in surfing speeds and by the adoption of advanced services and value-added applications. In 2015,2016, against the backgroundbackdrop of introduction and expansion of bitstream access, an increase of 8% was recorded inthe wholesale Internet services, the number of Bezeq'sBezeq’s Internet subscribers (retail and wholesale) increased by 5% compared to 2014. At the end of 2015, there were 244,000 Internet subscribers on the wholesale platform, amounting to 17% of Bezeq's Internet subscribers).with 2015. Average monthly revenue per Internet subscriber (retail) increasedrose by 5%2% compared with 2014. In 2015, Bezeq began providing wholesale BSA services and as of December 31, 2015, Bezeq had 250,000 wholesale Internet lines in its network.2015.

 

HOT provides broadband services through a hybrid fiber coaxial cable (a broadband network which combines optical fiber and coaxial cable).

Graph - Internet subscribers - wholesale market since launching of the service in the first quarter of 2015 (quarterly, in thousands):

Wholesale Market Regulation. Following hearings in January, August and November 2014, the Minister of Communications amended the licenses of Bezeq and Hot Telecommunications and delineated the basket of services under the licenses, i.e., managed broadband access and wholesale telephony services. The regulations attached to the Minister’s decision contained the obligation to provide the services, including accompanying services and the regulation of maximum rates (which require the Finance Minister’s approval) for the provision of the wholesale services. Bezeq expects that the implementation of the wholesale services regulation in the manner specified above could adversely affect its results of operations; however, the possible cancellation of the structural separation and supervision over Bezeq’s fees as a result of the wholesale market regulation could positively impact Bezeq. In December 2014, Bezeq filed a petition with the Israeli High Court of Justice, or the High Court of Justice, to cancel the decision, and consequently to cancel the amendment of Bezeq’s license, the regulations prescribing the obligation to provide the services and the regulation of the maximum rates for the wholesale services, and to schedule an urgent hearing on the petition.

 

 

 3836 

 

Graph - distribution of Internet lines on Bezeq infrastructure (quarterly, in thousands):

In a hearing on the petition that took place in March 2015, the Court ordered the parties to return to the negotiation table to discuss various matters that arose in the petition

 

The transmission and to notify the Court within 60 days of the outcome.In April 2015, Bezeq received a letter from the Ministry of Communications stating that the Ministry believes that the provision of wholesale telephony services can in fact be implemented with small adjustments, within a short period of time and at minimal cost to Bezeq. The Ministry also suggested possible technological solutions for providing the service. While the Ministry expected that Bezeq would prepare for the provision of the service by May 17, 2015, Bezeq rejected the statements in the letter and sent a detailed response to the Ministry. In its response to the Court, Bezeq rejected the statements of the Ministry of Communications and asserted that: the various solutions proposed by the Ministry for providing telephony services in the wholesale market were not technologically feasible and that the tariffs determined by the Ministry of Communications for the provision of such services were unreasonable. Another hearing took place in October 2015.data communications segment

 

On December 10, 2015 the Ministry of Communications publishedThe transmission and data communications segment for business customers and communications providers is characterized by a hearingrapid increase in the mattercustomers' broadband consumption, but in general by lower prices per given volume of “The Provisiontraffic. This stems both from development of Telephony Services via Resale on the Bezeq Network.” A draft amendmenttechnology allowing greater bandwidth at lower prices than in the past, and from competition in this area. There is also a decline in use of the Company's transmission and data communication services by communications providers, in part as a result of the trend of entry of communications groups. This trend is expected to Bezeq’s general license was attachedincrease due to the hearing document, addressinguse of physical infrastructure (as part of the addition of telephony service to the license, in a resale format. The service enables the holder of a general license that is authorized to provide domestic landline operating services, to purchase telephony services from the company, such that will facilitate the sending and receiving of phone calls and the provision of accompanying and value addedwholesale services provided by the company, as much as possible, in such a manner that the service provider’s subscriber will not discern that he is receiving service through Bezeq, other than with respect to technical support. In this framework the service provider may bundle packages that are marketed to its subscribers in any format whatsoever.

At the hearing the Ministry stated that is considering allowing Bezeq to offer the service as an interim solutionBezeq) also for a limited period of one year from the date of the decision at the hearing, following which Bezeq will provide wholesale telephony service. It was further stated at the hearing that the service will be provided immediately after the determination of the operating arrangements with the providers, as the provision of services does not require preparations or changes to Bezeq’s engineering systems, but rather only to the IT systems.cellular requirements.

 

ISP Market

 

While only Bezeq and HOT provide broadband Internet infrastructure access servicesThere are a number of competitors in Israel), many telecommunications companies hold ISP licenses,this market, including Bezeq International, 013 Netvision (which merged with Cellcom)(Cellcom), 012 Smile (which merged with Partner)(Partner), HOTHot Net (a subsidiary of HOT) and numeroustwo minor niche players. players whose share is not material.

Bezeq International’s estimated marketInternational estimates that its share of the ISPInternet access market based on the number of subscribers, was 44% as ofat December 31, 2015 compared to 42% as of2016 and December 31, 2014. The Israeli ISP market is a saturated market and as competitors are typically unable to differentiate themselves based on2015.

Competition in 2016 was marked by price they attempt to differentiate themselves primarily by strengthening customer loyalty; however, competition has led to increased churn rates.erosion.

 

Broadband infrastructure and ISP Services Markets Trends in 2016

The Internet access market in Israel is characterized by:

Increasing Broadband Speeds: Israeli Internet consumers continueStrengthening the service bundle sales trend, particularly due to demand increased Internet bandwidth speeds.the expansion of the wholesale sales model operations (provider + infrastructure) in 2016.

 

Slow-DownContinuing the increasing trend in Market Growth Rates: Despite the fact that the Israeli fixed-line broadband Internet infrastructure accesssales of added value services market is still growing in terms of the number of subscribers, the increase in penetration rate is slowing compared to previous yearssuch as a result of the high penetration levels in the market.anti-phishing, cyber protection and remote backup services.

 

Increasing Adoption of Services and Value-Added Applications: Advanced and value-added services, such as data protection services, e-mail, anti-virus and cloud services, are increasingly becoming differentiators in theDue to market and are believedsaturation, emphasis is given to enhancestrengthening customer loyalty and reduce churn rate.loyalty.

 

Cellular Telephony Services Market

The Israeli cellular telephony market is mature and highly competitive. Three cellular telephony operators, Cellcom, Partner and Pelephone, have historically led the Israeli cellular telephony market. The Israeli cellular telephony market is characterized by a dominant post-paid market (i.e. purchased subscriptions rather than use of pre-paid cards).The cellular market growth rate is lower due to “penetration rate” saturation. Penetration rate is the ratio between the number of subscribers in the market and the total population in Israel (excluding foreign workers and Palestinians, although they are included in the number of subscribers). The penetration rate at December 31, 2015 is124%2016 was 122%.

 

The Israelinumerous cellular telephony market is characterized by a dominant post-paid market (i.e. purchased subscriptions rather than use of pre-paid cards).

39

In 2015, the trends that began in 2012 continued with increased competitionoperators in the Israeli cellular communications market. The entry of the new infrastructure operators, Golan and Hot Mobile, and to a lesser extent the activity of virtual cellular operators, resulted in the erosion of prices and the continued high level of mobility of customers between the companies.

Cellcom and Partner operate nationwide cellular networks based on GSM, UMTS/HSPA and 4G technologies. HOT Mobile and Golan Telecom are able to utilize the existing operators’ networks based on a national roaming model for a period of up to seven yearsmarket, resulting from the launch of their operations (with an option to extend such period for another three years, subject to regulatory approval). HOT Mobile and Golan Telecom have yet to complete the rollout of their networks. HOT Mobile currently uses national roaming services provided by Partner, and prior to 2015, it used national roaming services provided by Pelephone. Golan Telecom uses the national roaming services provided by Cellcom.

In addition, following measures taken by the Israeli government to encourage competition in the cellular telephony market, 11 MVNO licenses were granted by the Israeli government. We believe that only four of the MVNO licensees currently provide services: Rami Levy (which signed hosting agreements with Pelephone), Alon Cellular (whose customers have subsequently been acquired by Pelephone), Azi Communications (which signed a hosting agreement with Pelephone and Partner) and Home Cellular (which signed a hosting agreement with Cellcom). A fifth MVNO, Cellact, signed a hosting agreement with Pelephone.

The main trends that characterize the cellular telephony market in Israel are:

Increasing Competition, Followed by Potential ARPU Stabilization. The entry of the new operators as a result of regulatory changes, together with regulations banning exit fees and reducing interconnect fees, led to intensified competition in the cellular telephony market in Israel. Golan Telecom and HOT Mobile had a strong incentive to obtain market share, as depending on their market share after the grant of their license, they could have been required to pay a license fee of up to NIS 360 million and NIS 710 million, respectively. These developments resulted in higher churn rates among the existing operators and a significant decrease in tariffs. In November 2013, HOT Mobile was notified by the Ministry of Communications that as a result of meeting certain market share targets, the vast majority of its guarantee is reduced. We believe that Golan Telecom is expected to receive similar notification in the near future.

Changing Pricing Dynamics. Partly as a result of intensified competition, during 2012 the manner of pricing services in the cellular telephony market changed significantly. Instead of charging subscribers for actual usage, the cellular telephony operators are primarily offering packages with unlimited usage. The increased competition and change in the format of the communication packages led to a significant decrease in ARPU and higher churn rates.

Increasing Demand for Data Transfer Services. The penetration of smartphones has led to a rise in the supply of alternative applications and services, resulting in a higher level of consumption of data transfer services. The increasing demand for data transfer services has the potential to offset, in part, revenue shortfalls from traditional voice services. In addition, there has been an increase in the rate of use of smartphones that support LTE technology, a technology that allows better browsing. This increase has led to a further increase in consumption of 4G data.

LTE Technology. LTE technology, which is based on an Internet Protocol that can transfer data at higher speeds than the existing Generation 3.5 technology, is used by many operators around the world and is now supported by many smartphones in operation in the Israeli market. In March 2012, the Ministry of Communications published a work plan with respect to the introduction of LTE technology. The Ministry of Communications issued a tender for allocating LTE frequencies in 2014 and Pelephone was awarded 15 MHz on the 1800 frequency band. Pelephone also entered into network sharing arrangements for 4G networks with Cellcom and Golan Telecom, similarly to an agreement reached by Partner and HOT Mobile, both subject to governmental approvals, including the Israeli Antitrust Authority. Technological developments in the area of LTE, could have a significant effect on the market.

In January 2015, Pelephone participated in an online tender held by the State of Israel for the allocation of 4G LTE frequencies. Under the tender, Pelephone was awarded 15 MHz of bandwidth within the 1800 MHz spectrum, at a total cost of NIS 96 million. In August 2015, Pelephone was notified that its license was amended to include the 4G LTE frequencies and those frequencies were allocated.

Network Sharing Agreements. In December 2013, Pelephone entered into a network sharing agreement for the construction and operation of a shared 4G network with Cellcom and Golan Telecom for a term of 15 years with an option to extend for an additional 15-year term, and an agreement with Cellcom for the sharing of passive components of cell sites on each company’s existing networks for a term of 15 years. The agreements are expected to provide significant cost savings and reduced capital expenditure requirements with respect to the deployment and maintenance of an LTE network, as well as with respect to the maintenance of existing UMTS network. The network sharing arrangements are subject to approvals by the Israeli authorities, including the Israeli Antitrust Authority. The December 9, 2013 agreement followed the November 2013 announcement by Partner and HOT Mobile that they had entered into a 15-year network sharing agreement. On May 15, 2014, the Ministry of Communications published a paper on "policy for sharing the broadband access network of a holder of a general license for the provision of mobile radio-telephone services." From Pelephone's review of the Policy Paper, it emerges that the sharing agreement apparently does not comply with the threshold terms included therein.

40

In September 2014, Pelephone entered into a cooperation agreement with Cellcom for maintenance of the passive components at their cellular sites, including uniting passive components and reducing costs through a joint contractor. The agreement provides for maintenance of the shared sites through a supplier that will be selected by Pelephone and Cellcom. The supplier, which will be chosen through a tender, will sign separate agreements with Pelephone and Cellcom for a period of at least 5 years.

In July 2015, the Antitrust Commissioner resolved that the foregoing engagement will be exempt from the conditions for approval of a restrictive agreement. Pelephone and Cellcom have not yet, at this stage, executed the engagement in practice. At the same time, Pelephone is reviewing the implementation of a project to lower the maintenance costs of the passive components by using Pelephone's employees.

As part of the regulatory measures adopted by the Ministry of Communications since 2012 with the aim of increasingin recent years to increase competition in the cellularradio telephony market, several additional cellular operators entered the market. The entry of the new operators led to substantial increasestrong competition that continued in competition among all the cellular operators.2016 as well. The increased competitioncontinuing trend led to an increase inhigh subscriber churn among the existingcellular operators and to a fierce price war that intensifies from year to year, leading to substantialsignificant erosion of pricestariffs and in profit margins, in the private customer market as well as in the business customer market. This trend continued and even intensified in 2015.

 

Pelephone expects this trendthese trends to continue in 2016,2017, leading to further reductions in revenues and profitability.erosion of revenues. Pelephone is introducing streamlining measures and cost structure adjustments in an effort to reduce the impacterosion of revenues.

37

As present there are five operators with mobile telephony licenses in the cellular telecommunications market in Israel (Pelephone, Cellcom, Partner, Golan Telecom and HOT Mobile) and a few MVNO operators with mobile telephony licenses for hosting on its profit margins.another network (virtual operators).

In 2016, to the best of Pelephone’s knowledge, two key changes occurred regarding competition:

A network sharing agreement was signed by Cellcom and Marathon 018. This agreement, if approved by the Ministry of Communications, increases the number of infrastructure sharing operators to six.

A network sharing agreement was signed between Cellcom and Electra, which acquired Golan Telecom. The acquisition of Golan Telecom and the network sharing agreement between Electra and Cellcom were approved by the Antitrust Commissioner and of the Ministry of Communications.

Infrastructure sharing

 

The table below providesinfrastructure sharing allows consolidation of the cellular operators' sites that substantially reduces the operating and maintenance costs of the radio sites. To the best of Pelephone's knowledge, as of Reporting Date, infrastructure sharing on the market are as follows:

Partner and HOT Mobile operate under radio segment infrastructure sharing through a joint company that received a special license for providing radio cellular infrastructure services to cellular operators.

Cellcom and Marathon 018 engaged in a network sharing agreement, which was approved by the Ministry of Communications.

Golan Telecom hosted on Cellcom's network (to the best of the Pelephone's knowledge, without a network sharing agreement). At the same time as Electra's acquisition of Golan Telecom, Golan Telecom, Electra and Cellcom entered into a network sharing agreement that was approved by the Ministry of Communications and Antitrust Authority.

Virtual operators - MVNOs

To date, several MVNO licenses have been granted to virtual operators. Only a few MVNO licenses are active in the market at present.

In October 2015 Pelephone completed the acquisition of the MVNO operator, Alon Cellular Ltd. ("Alon Cellular"). Part of Alon Cellular's subscribers were hosted on Pelephone's network. As part of the acquisition, Pelephone gained approximately 70 thousand new subscribers.

The cellular telecommunications market is dynamic with frequent technological developments in all areas of operation (handsets, telecommunications network technologies and value added services). These developments impact the segment of operation on a number of levels.

Establishment of cellular networks using advanced technologies

Technology developments and the desire to widen the range and quality of services offered to the customer, require the cellular operators to periodically upgrade their network technologies. The cellular networks in Israel primarily use the UMTS/HSPA and LTE technologies (which are planned to be upgraded to the LTEA (LTE Advanced) technology). Pelephone intends to upgrade its LTE network to a LTEA network and submitted an application to the Ministry of Communications in February 2017 to use this technology. The investment in this technology is not expected to be substantial.

Since 2014, Pelephone has been extending its LTE network and the network is presently available in most parts of the country. Pelephone is continuing to extend this network to the rest of the country. Pelephone constantly reviews new technologies and the need to upgrade its existing network technologies, depending on the competitiveness of the market and the economic viability of the investment in such technologies.

Smartphones

The penetration of smartphones has led to a rise in the consumption of data transfer services while simultaneously increasing the supply of alternative applications and services to Pelephone's products and services that are provided by other entities. In addition, there has been an increase in the rate of smartphones that support LTE technology, a technology that allows better browsing. This increase has led to a further increase in consumption of 4G Data.

38

Below is a breakdown, to the best of Pelephone's knowledge, of the number of subscribers of Pelephone and of its competitors in 20142015 and 2015 (thousands2016 (in thousands of subscribers, approximate).

 

    Pelephone  Partner  Cellcom  Golan Telecom(1)  HOT Mobile  MVNOs(1)  Total subscribers in market 
December 31, 2014  No. of subscribers(2)   2,586   2,837   2,967   630   974   130   10,124 
   Market share   25.5%  28.0%  29.3%  6.2%  9.6%  1.3%    
December 31,  2015  No. of subscribers(2)   2,651   2,718   2,835   850   1,229   80   10,363 
   Market share   25.6%  26.2%  27.4%  8.2%  11.9%  0.8     

  Pelephone  Partner  Cellcom  HOT Mobile  Golan Telecom  MVNOs(1)  Total subscribers in market 
As at December 31, No. of subscribers (2)  2,651   2,718   2,835   1,229   900   177   10,510 
2015 Market share  25.2%  25.9%  27%  11.7%  8.6%  1.7%    
                               
At Sept 30, No. of subscribers (2)  2,348   2,693   2,822   1,409   863   209   10,344 
2016 Market share  22.7%  26.0%  27.3%  13.6%  8.3%  2%    

 

 

(1)Golan Telecom and most of the other MVNOs are private companies thatwhich do not publish figures regarding the number of their subscribers and these figures are based on estimates.
(2)The number of subscribers as of September 30, 20152016 and December 31, 20142015, are based on the public reports issued by Cellcom, Partner and HOT Mobile.

 

ILD Market

 

As of December 31, 2015,the end of 2016, there are eight competitorswere more than ten participants in the market including 014(including Bezeq International, 013 Netvision, 012 Smile,Cellcom, Partner, Golan Telecom and Hot Mobile International Communications.HOT Mobile). Bezeq International estimates that its market share for outgoing international calls as ofat December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 was 21% compared with a market share of 23% as of December 31, 2014. A new competitor entered the international telephony market when the mobile app WhatsApp launched its call service in April 2015..

 

The general characteristics of competition in the ILD market in 2016 were:

 41In 2016 the number of minutes used declined.

 WhatsApp app call services are continuing to increase the rate of decline in number of minutes in the general market.

 

Competition is focused on specific population sectors.

The product is a commodity.

Communication solutions for the business sector

In the ICT sector Bezeq International competes with competitors such as Binat, Teldor, IBM and others. In 2016, Bezeq International continued to establish its position in the ICT market and gained recognition and endorsement from leading global suppliers in the market.

NEP services - the traditional telephone exchange sector includes a large number of competitors and fierce competition which has given rise to erosion of service prices.

Bezeq International promotes its business with emphasis on differentiating it from its competitors as the owner of its own international infrastructure (Jonah cable) for its customers' traffic providing high quality browsing performance, as well as its leading customer service.

The fact that, unlike some of its competitors, Bezeq International is unable to offer its services as part of a non-detachable communications services bundle, adversely affects its operations.

 

Pay Television Services Market

 

Israel’s primary television platforms are dominated by pay television, with relatively limited penetration of free platforms such as terrestrial television or free DTH. Approximately 70% of the households in Israel subscribe for multi-channel pay television services from either DBS, which provides multi-channel satellite pay television services, or HOT, which provides multi-channel cable pay television services (Source: Informa Telecoms & Media). DBS, the only company licensed to provide multi-channel pay television broadcasts via satellite to subscribers in Israel, provides encoded and digital multi-channel broadcast services as well as other services. HOT, which provides cable pay television services, focuses its marketing strategy on offering bundles that include multi-channel pay television broadcast services together with other services such as ISP and fixed-line broadband Internet infrastructure access services (known as a “triple play”).

Television viewers in Israel are also able to receive free television services through DTT, a terrestrial implementation of digital television technology using an aerial to broadcast to a conventional television antenna (or aerial) instead of a satellite dish or cable television connections. In August 2009, the Second Authority, the public authority that supervises commercial broadcasting in Israel, launched DTT broadcasts on a nationwide basis, enabling the free distribution to the public of five DTT channels free of charge upon purchasing a set top box. DTT currently offers access to only six channels, there is currently no access to premium or thematic content (such as sports, movies or children’s programming) and it has no interactive functionalities (such as VOD). DTT has limited capacity to transfer a significant number of channels simultaneously and quality can be affected by the weather. However, pursuant to recent legislation, the DTT array may be expanded to include additional channels (including, among others, channels dedicated to specific themes and HD versions of any of the channels included in the DTT array) and the DTT system may be operated by a private entity instead of the Second Authority, and consequently, DTT could become more attractive in the future.

The transmission of video content over additional communication infrastructures has led to an increase in the amount and range of video content accessible to the public (whether with or without authorization from the holders of title to the content) and to a change in the format in which downloaded content is used for streaming. Viewing the content is by means of various items of terminal equipment, among them computers, televisions, tablets, and mobile phones. This trend allows diverse video content to be provided without the need for establishing specific network infrastructure (including by international entities) and at present, without regulatory supervision. In December 2014, Cellcom launched its Cellcom TV service, allowing VOD viewing through a special decoder, via the web, as well as DTT content. To the best of DBS’s knowledge, other entities are considering launching similar services. The establishment and development of such services could substantially affect competition in the broadcast sector, which is currently based on designated infrastructures, and this effect could intensify if the provision of such content continues without regulatory supervision.

Historically, Bezeq was not allowed to control DBS or offer bundled services that include pay television services. On March 26, 2014, the Israeli Antitrust Authority issued a decision which provides that upon the fulfillment of certain terms, the restrictions imposed on the Eurocom Group with respect to its ownership interest in DBS would be removed and Bezeq’s merger with DBS would be allowed. On June 23, 2015, the Ministry of Communications approved the transfer of the means of control in DBS to Bezeq allowing it to obtain 100% control of DBS. Bezeq paid Eurocom DBS NIS 680 million in consideration for the entire holdings of Eurocom DBS in DBS and acquired all the shareholder loans provided by Eurocom DBS to DBS on June 24, 2015. At such time, the director designee of Eurocom DBS to the board of DBS resigned.

In December 2014, Cellcom began providing its Cellcom TV services.

The penetration rates of DBS and HOT are estimated by DBS to be approximately 62% of households in Israel. DBS has indicated that it believes that its chances of penetrating an additional material segment are not high because most of the remaining households are not potential customers for DBS and HOT and have available alternative services to their services. Therefore, there has not been any significant change in the number of subscribers of DBS and HOT in recent years, mainly due to the increasing availability of alternative products. However, in 2015, there was a moderate increase in DBS's share of this market. An increase in the number of subscribers may be accomplished mainly by recruiting subscribers from the competition and recruiting new subscribers following the natural growth in the number of households. The broadcastingbroadcast sector is characterized by fierce competition, which requires anthe investment of substantial resources to retain existing subscribers and recruit new ones. In addition

There has been a slight erosion in the overall penetration rate of DBS and HOT is estimated by DBS to be 59.2% of the total number of households in Israel, and the penetration rate of Cellcom enteringis estimated to be 4% of the sector,total number of households in 2015,Israel. DBS estimates that the chances of increasing the total market share of these market participants is not high due to the fact that a large part of the remaining households are not potential audiences. To the best of DBS's knowledge, there washas not been a significant change in the overall number of subscribers of DBS and HOT in recent years, despite the increase in the number of households in Israel. After several years during which the number of DBS subscribers remained stable and even increased, there has been a decline in DBS's share of this market due to the entry of Cellcom into this market in 2015. Competition also an increased consumptiondue to the increased number of users gaining access to pirated broadcasts.

 

 4239 

 

 

Competitors in the market

DBS’s main competitor is HOT, which also provides multi-channel television services to subscribers, under a broadcast license. Another significant competitor is Cellcom, which has in recent years expanded its services and content that are based on both DTT broadcasting and VOD content, and 30 linear channels transmitted via OTT configuration. There are also other OTT players operating in the market as well as pirated services.

The following table providesis a breakdown of DBS and HOT subscriber numbers and market shareshares to the best of DBS’sDBS's knowledge, at December 31, 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2015.2016*.

 

2015  2014  2013 
Subscribers (in thousands)  Market share  Subscribers (in thousands)  Market share  Subscribers
(in thousands)
  Market share 
 635   44%  630   42%  600   40%
2016  2015  2014 
Subscribers
(in thousands)
  Market share  Subscribers
(in thousands)
  Market share  Subscribers
(in thousands)
  Market share 
 614   40%  635   42%  630   42%

*The number of subscribers is approximate and the market share is rounded. Subscriber – one household or small business customer. In the case of business customers who have more than a minimum number of decoders (such as hotels, kibbutz or gym), the number of subscribers are standardized.

Competition in this market focuses on broadcast content, and price and quality of services, as well as offering additional services, such as HD and VOD services, and advanced decoders, as a result of the demand for advanced and personalized television broadcasting.

 

Regulatory

 

Permit to Control Bezeq Granted to Members of the Eurocom Group

  

The Israeli Communications Law and the Communications Order provide that the control over Bezeq requires a control permit from the Ministers.

As part of our acquisition of the controlling interest in Bezeq, we, Internet Gold, SP2, SP1, and other members of the Eurocom group applied for authorization to control Bezeq, pursuant to the Israeli Communications Law and Communications Order. On April 13, 2010, the Control Permit was granted subject to the condition that SP2 is controlled exclusively by the other parties to the control permit. Concurrently, a separate control permit was also granted to Messrs. Shaul Elovitch and Yossef Elovitch, our controlling shareholders, or the Individuals’ Control Permit. According to the Communications Order, we are not allowed to transfer our control or any Means of Control which will result in a decrease of our minimum holding requirement in Bezeq (30%) without the prior consent of the Ministers. The foregoing includes a transfer of the Bezeq interest in one transaction or a series of transactions, by one party or together with the other parties to the Control Permit or the parties to the Individuals’ Control Permit. However, the parties may transfer the Means of Control of Bezeq among themselves, subject to compliance with certain conditions set forth in the Control Permit.

 

According to the Control Permit, the parties (through SP2) must hold not less than 30% of any type of Means of Control (as described below) of Bezeq. Such percentage is permitted to decrease below 30% to no less than 29% for a period of six months, in the event of dilution resulting from the exercise of stock options by Bezeq employees. However, the Communications Order prohibits the issuance of shares which will result in a decrease of our minimum holding requirement in Bezeq (30%) or our ceasing to control Bezeq without the prior consent of the Ministers (certain permitted issuances do not require the Minister’s prior consent). Despite the 30% rule, according to Article 3(a3) of the Communications Order, which is included as part of the Control Permit, the parties to the Control Permit may hold less than 30% under certain circumstances, including the requirement that the parties control Bezeq and maintain at least a 25% ownership interest in Bezeq. According to Article 3(a3)On February 2, 2016, we announced that our wholly-owned subsidiary, SP2, sold 115,500,000 Bezeq shares. As a result, we received gross proceeds of NIS 8.50 per share, or NIS 982 million in the Communications Order, which is included as part of the Control Permit, the parties to the Control Permit may hold less than 30% under certain circumstances, including the requirement that the parties control Bezeq and maintain at leastaggregate (approximately $248 million). We retained a 25%26.34% ownership interest in Bezeq. Accordingly,Bezeq following the parties are entitled to sell a portion of their Bezeq shareholdings to the extent they will retain at least 25%closing of the outstandingtransaction. In addition to our ownership of Bezeq shares, a total of 1,000,000 ordinary shares of Bezeq are jointly held by Mr. Shaul Elovitch, our controlling shareholder, and no amendment tohis brother Mr. Yossef Elovitch. An additional 72,360 ordinary shares of Bezeq are held by Ms. Iris Elovitch, the Control Permit orwife of Mr. Elovitch, and 11,556 ordinary shares of Bezeq are held by Ms. Orna Elovitch, the indenture governing our 7⅜% Senior Secured Notes is necessary or required to sell Bezeq shares as long as the parties retain in excessdaughter-in-law of 25% the ownerships interest in Bezeq.Mr. Elovitch.

 

Our SP2 subsidiary owns most of our Bezeq shares. In accordance with the Control Permit, SP2 our subsidiary which holds the Bezeq shares is required to notify the Ministers of any changes in the composition of its board of directors every six months and if the change represents half or more of the members of the board of directors, within 30 days of the change. We and Internet Gold are also required to notify the Ministers of any “Exceptional Holdings” in Bezeq (as described below) immediately upon becoming aware of such event. We and Internet Gold are also required to notify the Ministers in the event a shareholder becomes a “principal shareholder” (namely, holds, directly or indirectly, over 5% of our issued and outstanding share capital) and regarding any 1% or more change in the holdings of a “principal shareholder” within 48 hours of becoming aware of such change. Our Articles of Association require our shareholders to notify us within a specified period of time after crossing any such threshold.

 

40

Under the Communications Order, no person may hold, directly or indirectly, “significant influence” over Bezeq or 5% or more of any particular class of Means of Control in Bezeq. The Communications Order defines “holding” as the holding, acquisition, transfer and encumbrance of the Means of Control in Bezeq, defines “significant influence” as the ability to substantially influence the activity of a company, either alone or together with others or using others, directly or indirectly, which arises by virtue of the possession of Means of Control therein or in another corporation, including where such ability is pursuant to the corporation’s articles of association, or pursuant to an agreement (whether written or oral) with the controlling shareholder. “Means of Control” is defined under the Communications Order as the right to vote at a general meeting of the company, to appoint a director or general manager of the company, or to participate in the profits of the company or a share of the remaining assets of the company after payment of its debts upon liquidation. Additionally, no person, together with any other person, appoint, elect or dismiss the general manager of Bezeq or cause the election, appointment or dismissal of any director of Bezeq, without the prior written consent of the Ministers. A person shall be deemed to have “significant influence” if (i) he has the right to appoint a director or the chief executive officer; or (ii) if that person holds 25% or more of the Means of Control of a corporation. Additionally, no person, together with any other person, may appoint, elect or dismiss the general manager of Bezeq or cause the election, appointment or dismissal of any director of Bezeq, without the prior written consent of the Ministers.

43

 

Subject to certain exceptions, prior written approval of the Ministers is also required to increase the holdings or other rights in excess of those determined in the initial approval, including by means of an agreement (including a voting agreement). Furthermore, under the Communications Order, no person may transfer control, “significant influence” or Means of Control in Bezeq to another, if, as a result of the transfer, the holdings of the transferee would require approval pursuant to the Israeli Communications Law or Communications Order and the transferee is not in possession of the requisite approval. Any such unauthorized holding or acquisition is referred to as “Exceptional Holdings.”

 

The Communications Order provides that in the event that a person holds “significant influence” or Means of Control in Bezeq, to a degree that requires the Ministers’ prior approval, without receiving prior approval for such Exceptional Holdings (including as a result of the realization of a pledge over Means of Control), such person must report such Exceptional Holdings in writing to Bezeq and must submit an application to the Ministers for approval of such Exceptional Holdings all within 48 hours. Such application is required to be in the form of the questionnaire annexed to the Communications Order and must be accompanied by a power of attorney authorizing Bezeq’s board of directors to sell the applicant’s Exceptional Holdings (unless the Ministers have granted an exemption from providing a power of attorney). Following the submission of the application and all relevant documents, the Ministers have 60 days to inform the applicant and Bezeq as to their decision.

 

In addition to the possibility of obtaining a retroactive approval as described above, the Communications Order establishes the following procedure for the sale of Exceptional Holdings: (i) with respect to a person who has not applied for approval by the Ministers, as described above, such person must sell his Exceptional Holdings within seven days; (ii) with respect to a person whose permit has been revoked or has expired, and who has not submitted a new application, such person must sell his Exceptional Holdings within 14 days after the date of the revocation or expiration, as the case may be; and (iii) with respect to a person who has applied for approval by the Ministers, including a party whose permit has been revoked or has expired and who has submitted a new application, and whose application has been rejected, such person must sell his Exceptional Holdings within 60 days after the date on which the Ministers informed such person that his application has been rejected. If a person does not sell his Exceptional Holdings as detailed in sub-sections (i)-(iii) and Bezeq holds a power of attorney from such person as required by the Communications Order, Bezeq will sell the Exceptional Holdings within 60 days, on a stock exchange, in Israel or abroad, or through an off-exchange transaction. The proceeds of the sale will be delivered to the holder, less expenses involved in the sale.

 

In accordance with the Israeli Communications Law and Communications Order, and as set forth in our Articles of Association, a holder of Exceptional Holdings (including a holder that submitted an application for approval which was submitted to the Ministers, whether such application was rejected or has not yet been approved) will not be entitled to any rights in respect of its holdings in Bezeq, including with regard to the receipt of dividends, unless and to the extent permitted under the Communications Order. Accordingly, a holder of Exceptional Holdings will not have any voting rights at a general meeting of shareholders. Each shareholder participating in a general meeting of shareholders is required to certify to us prior to the vote or, if the shareholder is voting by a proxy or any similar instrument, on such proxy card or similar instrument, as to whether or not his holdings in our company or his vote require the approval of the Ministers pursuant to the Israeli Communications Law and Communications Order. In addition, no director may be appointed, elected or removed from office by virtue of the vote of a holder of Exceptional Holdings. If a director is appointed, elected or removed from office by virtue of the vote of a holder of Exceptional Holdings, such appointment, election or removal from office shall have no effect.

41

 

The holding of control, “significant influence” or 5% or more of any particular class of Means of Control without the required approval or in violation of the terms of the approval constitutes a criminal offense and could subject the holder to criminal penalties as follows: (i) a person transferring control of Bezeq or acquiring and holding control over Bezeq without the required approval is subject to three years imprisonment or a fine currently in the amount of NIS 2.26 million as well as an additional fine for each day the offense continues (currently in the amount of NIS 14,000 per day); (ii) a person holding “significant influence” or more than 5% of the Means of Control of Bezeq without the required approval is subject to six months imprisonment or a fine currently in the amount of NIS 226,000 as well as an additional fine for each day the offense continues (currently in the amount of NIS 14,000 per day); and (iii) a person transferring “significant influence” or Means of Control of Bezeq, knowing that as a result of the transfer, the holdings of the transferee require approval pursuant to the Israeli Communications Law or the Communications Order, without being first shown the appropriate approval by the transferee, shall be subject to a fine currently in the amount of NIS 226,000.

 

According to the Control Permit, SP2 must at all times be held by an “Israeli Party,” as defined in the Communications Order, to the following extent:

 

At least 19% of each of the Means of Control of SP2 must be held by an Israeli Party at all times; or

 

 44

At least 19% of the rights to vote at the general meeting of shareholders of SP2 and the rights to appoint directors of SP2 must be held by an Israeli Party at all times; and

 

The right to appoint at least one-fifth of the directors of Bezeq and Bezeq’s subsidiaries and not less than one director of each such company will be held by an Israeli Party at all times, provided that the percentage of the Israeli Party’s direct or indirect shareholdings in Bezeq is not less than 3% of any of the Means of Control of Bezeq. Indirect shareholdings will be calculated as the product of the Israeli Party’s lowest rate of holdings in each of the Means of Control in SP2, multiplied by the percentage of the holdings of the parties to the Control Permit in each of the Means of Control in Bezeq.

 

The Ministers have determined that we and Internet Gold are deemed to be “Israeli Parties,” so long as we and Internet Gold are controlled by a citizen and resident of Israel and that the ownership interest of Messrs. Shaul Elovitch and Yossef Elovitch in our company and Internet Gold does not fall below 50% at any time.

 

The parties to the Control Permit may not be controlled by any foreign country, foreign government company or a foreign company controlled by a foreign government company. The Control Permit will terminate if the foregoing condition ceases to exist with respect to any such party without the approval of the Ministers. The Ministers may authorize a foreign government company to hold an interest in any such party, provided that the foreign government company’s aggregate direct or indirect holdings in Bezeq do not exceed 5% of any type of Means of Control of Bezeq and that it does not control such party.

 

According to the Communications Order a “principal shareholder” or a person with “significant influence” in Bezeq shall not be onebe; (i) a hostile state, a citizen or resident of a hostile state, a corporation registered or incorporated in a hostile state or a corporation controlled by a citizen or resident of a hostile state; or (ii) a government corporation, unless approved by the following:Ministers.

a hostile state, a citizen or resident of a hostile state, a corporation registered or incorporated in a hostile state or a corporation controlled by a citizen or resident of a hostile state; or

a government corporation, unless approved by the Ministers.

 

In the event the Ministers find that the information they were provided in the application for the control permit is incorrect, that there has been a material change in the details provided by the parties to the Control Permit which justifies its cancellation, or such parties failed to submit a required report, and the Ministers determine that there is probable cause to believe that the provision of the services that Bezeq is required to provide pursuant to its general license (including basic telephone, infrastructure, transmission and data transmission services and ancillary services) or the grounds for determining that any such service has been harmed, the Ministers may take action to cancel the Control Permit. Upon its cancellation, all the shareholdings purchased under the Control Permit will be deemed Exceptional Holdings as described above.

 

The Control Permit also authorizes an interested party in Internet Gold and our company that is not a party to the Control Permit or the Individuals’ Control Permit to hold Means of Control in Bezeq, provided that such interested party does not hold more than 15% of any type of Means of Control of Internet Gold and our company. The foregoing authorization is subject to the condition (among others) that the percentage of holdings of the parties to the Control Permit in Internet Gold, of Internet Gold’s holdings in our company and of Eurocom Communications’ holdings in Internet Gold exceed 50% of the Means of Control in each of such companies at all times. We and Internet Gold are required to notify the Ministers of the share ownership of any such interested party.

 

If we, Internet Gold or any other member of the Eurocom Group subject to the Control Permit fails to comply with the terms of the Control Permit or with other regulatory provisions relating to the control of Bezeq, such permit could be revoked and our rights with respect to our Bezeq interest would be adversely affected.

 

42

Any event in which a receiver is appointed with respect to our holdings in SP2 or SP2’s holdings in Bezeq will constitute grounds for the cancellation of the Control Permit. In the event that the Control Permit is cancelled and an application to reissue a Control Permit is denied, our holdings in Bezeq must be liquidated within 15 to 60 days (depending on the cause for such cancellation) pursuant to the Communications Order.

 

The provisions of the Control Permit are subject to the terms of the Communications Order and Israeli Communications Law, as they may be amended from time to time.

Sale of an Ownership Interest in Bezeq

As indicated above, according to Article 3(a3) of the Communications Order, which is included as part of the Control Permit, the parties to the Control Permit may hold less than 30% under certain circumstances, including the requirement that the parties control Bezeq and maintain at least a 25% ownership interest in Bezeq. Accordingly, the parties are entitled to sell a portion of their Bezeq shareholdings to the extent they retain at least 25% of the outstanding Bezeq shares, and no amendment to the Control Permit or the indenture governing our 7⅜% Senior Secured Notes is necessary or required to sell Bezeq shares as long as the parties retain in excess of 25% of the ownership interest in Bezeq.

45

On February 2, 2016, we announced that our wholly-owned subsidiary, SP2, sold 115,500,000 Bezeq shares. As a result, we received gross proceeds of NIS 8.50 per share, or NIS 982 million in the aggregate (approximately $248 million). We retained a 26.34% ownership interest in Bezeq following the closing of the transaction.

According to the terms of the indenture for our 7⅜% Senior Secured Notes, the net proceeds from the sale of any Bezeq shares held by our company or our subsidiaries SP1 and SP2 must be deposited into our “Lockbox Account” and are subject to other customary conditions and covenants relating to asset sales and release of liens on sold assets. In addition, according to the terms of the indenture, we must make an offer within 365 days to the holders of the notes to purchase notes with the proceeds deposited in the lockbox account at a cash offer price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of purchase.

 

The Concentration Law

 

In December 2013, the Knesset passed the Concentration Law, which regulates the following principal matters: (i) limitations on the control over companies with publicly held debt or equity securities through a pyramidal ownership structure by imposing a limitation on the number of public companies (tiers) in such pyramidal structure; (ii) authorizes financial regulators to set forth limitations on the amount of credit that financial institutions are permitted to provide to a corporation or a group of companies under the control of the same controlling shareholder; and (iii) limitations on the holdings by a significant non-finance company in a significant finance company or the holdings of both kinds of companies under common control; and (iv) requires governmental authorities responsible for the award of rights in public assets (including in the communications field) in certain events to consider control concentration factors and industry-specific competitive factors.

 

Limitations on the control of public companies through a pyramidal ownership structure

 

Prohibition on a second-tier company controlling another tier company

 

The purpose of the Concentration Law is to limit the possibility to control a “tier company” (generally defined as a company with publicly held debt or equity securities that are subject to reporting obligations under the Israeli Securities Law) through a pyramidal structure of additional tier companies. Each of Internet Gold, our company and Bezeq is considered a “tier company” for the purposes of the Concentration Law. A “second-tier” company is a tier company that is directly controlled by a first-tier company, and accordingly, our company is deemed a “second-tier” company under the Concentration Law.

 

The Concentration Law prohibits a second-tier company from controlling another tier company. In the case of existing pyramidal structures, a second-tier company is entitled to continue to control another tier company that it controlled on the publication date of the Concentration Law for a period of six years from the date of publication of the Concentration Law (until December 10, 2019). For the purpose of the law, Bezeq is considered a third tier company, and accordingly, if by December 10, 2019, we remain a tier company, we will not be allowed to control Bezeq from that date.

 

In the event that a second-tier company controls another tier company contrary to the provisions of the Concentration Law, a district court may appoint a trustee, who will be awarded the means of control (including voting rights and right to appoint directors) in such tier company for the purpose of selling such means of control. The trustee shall act pursuant to the orders of the district court with respect to such means of control and will be entitled to petition the district court to rule, among other things, that an appointment of directors in the tier company that was made prior to the trustee’s appointment is void, to cancel transactions between the controlled tier company and its controlling shareholder or transactions in which the controlling shareholder had a personal interest if they have not yet been completed and to order the cancellation of a dividend distribution that was not in the tier company’s interests which occurred prior to the trustee’s appointment. The district court may, instead of appointing a trustee and under certain circumstances, order that the means of control held by the controlling shareholder shall not provide any rights whatsoever. Until the appointment of a trustee by the district court, the means of control held by a second-tier company that illegally controls another tier company shall not grant any voting rights at the illegally held tier company’s shareholder meetings.

 

The Concentration Law sets forth certain mechanisms intended to enable a tier company, which is subject to the prohibition of controlling another tier company, to make various arrangements for the repurchase of its publicly-held shares and the early redemption of publicly-held debt in order to comply with the provisions of the law. These mechanisms enable the repurchase of publicly-held shares and the early redemption of publicly-held debt securities under a court-approved scheme of arrangement pursuant to the Israeli Companies Law, at fair value and in accordance with the conditions prescribed by the Concentration Law, while providing certain relief from shareholders or debenture holder majority requirements for the approval of the arrangement.

 

46

Appointment of directors and the composition of the board of a “third- tier” company during the transition period

 

Beginning six months after the publication of the Concentration Law and until the end of the six years’ transition period during which a “third-tier” company can no longer be controlled by a second-tier company, the board of directors of a company that is a “third-tier” company (such as Bezeq) must be comprised of a majority of “independent directors,” within the meaning of the Israeli Companies Law, and the number of “external directors” pursuant to the Israeli Companies Law shall be at least half the number of the company’s directors less one (rounded upwards) but not less than two. The election of such external directors will be by a majority vote of the shareholders and the controlling shareholder’s vote will not be counted for such purpose. The Israeli Minister of Justice is authorized to enact regulations setting forth a lower number of required external directors, provided that such number will not be lower than one-third of the board members.

 

43

In June 2014, the Regulations to Promote Competition and Reduce Concentration (Relief with Regard to the Number of External Directors), 2014, were published. Pursuant to these regulations, if a director of a company who is appointed according to the proposal of a representative labor union under a collective labor agreement serves in another tier company, the number of external directors in the tier company required under the Concentration Law who meet the provisions of the law may be reduced, provided that the external directors account for at least one-third of the board members. Bezeq complies with the provisions of the Concentration Law in this respect.

 

Limitations on the provision of credit to corporations and issuer groups

 

The Minister of Finance and the Governor of the Bank of Israel are authorized to enact regulations and directives limiting the amount of credit provided by financial institutions in Israel, cumulatively, to a corporation or a group of companies under the control of the same controlling shareholder. Such regulations have not yet been enacted.

 

TheRegulatory Requirements Relating to the Bezeq Group

 

The Bezeq Group is subject to various regulatory requirements and obligations including communications and broadcasting laws (including provisions applicable to providers of essential services), general antitrust law, securities and companies laws, consumer protection laws, planning and construction laws, environment, health and safety laws, as well as technical and other regulations. The communications and broadcasting industry in Israel is highly regulated and requires service providers to obtain licenses from, and comply with the terms of such licenses and the policy statements of, the Ministry of Communications or the Israeli Council for Cable and Satellite Broadcasting, or the Broadcasting Council, with respect to the various communications and broadcasting services, respectively, before offering such services to the public. Holding Means of Control in telecommunications services providers is also subject to regulation, including certain prohibitions on cross-holdings in communications companies. The ever-changing regulatory environment has had and will likely continue to have a material effect on the Bezeq Group’s activities. Certain key provisions of the regulations governing the Bezeq Group’s activities are set forth below. This description is not intended to be an exhaustive description of all regulations nor a review of specific obligations which have been imposed on the Bezeq Group.

 

As a general matter, the regulatory principles are set forth in the laws enacted by the Knesset, primarily the Israeli Communications Law. These laws are amended from time to time upon enactment by the Knesset. The laws authorize the Ministry of Communications (in some cases with the approval of the Economic Affairs Committee of the Knesset) to issue regulations which provide for specific requirements based upon the principles set forth in the applicable laws. In addition to the regulations, the Ministry of Communications issues policy statements after a public review and consultation process. These policy statements expand upon the Ministry of Communications’ policy with respect to certain basic issues in the relevant market. The Ministry of Communications grants licenses in accordance with the Israeli Communications Law and regulations. Bezeq was also declared a provider of essential services under the Communications Order and is subject to the provisions of such order.

 

GeneralStructural separation

 

Structural SeparationThe Communications Law grants the minister the authority to order accounting separation between different services provided by the same group/company and to demand separate companies for the provision of different services, including separation between rendering of services to a license holder and services rendered to a subscriber, and provisions regarding implementation of the separation.

 

Bezeq is subject to a duty toBezeq's domestic carrier license stipulates that it must maintain structural separation between itself and its subsidiaries set forth in its domestic fixed-line license (including Pelephone, Bezeq International and DBS). Separation is required betweensubsidiaries. This requires, among other things that management of the managements of Bezeq and its principal subsidiaries, as well as separation between the financial and marketing systems, assets and employees.

companies be fully separate. The structural separation limitations result in high administrative overheads andrestrictions place the Bezeq Group in an inferiorat a competitive positiondisadvantage, which is worsening over time compared with other Israeli communications groups that are not subject to certainsuch far-reaching limitations, and based on the ability for the operators to provide end-to-end services to subscribers using wholesale services, mainly BSA. These structural limitations, but notseparation restrictions also contribute to high management overheads.

On December 22, 2016, Bezeq received a notice from the Director General of the same scope.Ministry of Communications regarding "cancellation of the structural separation in Bezeq Group." According to the notice, the Ministry is initially promoting cancellation of the corporate separation in Bezeq Group so as to have the activities of Bezeq’s subsidiaries under the corporate structure of a single company, but with separation of divisions between the different activities. Accordingly, at this time the current regulations applicable to Bezeq's license regarding structural separation in terms of competition between the different activities will be maintained. Subsequently, the Director General informed Bezeq that the modification to the license in respect of cancellation of the corporate separation will be accompanied by a hearing. The notice states that the foregoing is subject to Bezeq's undertaking to invest in infrastructure by accelerating the deployment of broadband infrastructure (optic fibers) with the intention to launch the service at the beginning of 2017, to establish an accelerated deployment plan to 76% of households in Israel within three years, and to complete the universal deployment that was undertaken by Bezeq at a time to be determined. In the notice, the Ministry clarified that it also intends to hold a hearing regarding the structural separation cancellation arrangements during 2017. A hearing date has not yet been published.

 

 4744 

 

 

In July 2013,Bezeq is reviewing the Knesset approved an amendment to the Israeli Communications Law, providing, among other things, that the authorityoptions for implementation of the Ministercancellation of Communicationscorporate separation and is seeking to mandate structural separation between two license holders for the purpose of providingeffect a merger with DBS, subject to compliance with certain services also includes separation between the provision of services to another license holder and the provision of services to a subscriber. According to the explanatory notes to the draft amendment, the existing form of structural separation in the Israeli communications market is expected to be gradually cancelled; however, structural separation between the provision of services to a subscriber and the provision of services to another license holder is expected to be required if a wholesale market does not develop or if its development encounters difficulties such as price discrimination and high barriers for entry.

In October 2013, the Ministry of Communications published a hearing for public comment regarding the implementation of new a regulatory regime in the ILD market. Under the proposed regime, domestic fixed-line operators and cellular telephony operators would be allowed to provide ILD services as part of the service packages they offer to their subscribers. The proposed regime would also allow domestic fixed-line operators and cellular telephony operators to provide international data transfer and transmission services. If such regulatory regime is approved, it could have a significant impact on Bezeq International’s ILD operations.

Limitations on Marketing of Bundlespreconditions.

 

The structural separation limitations prevented Bezeq from marketing joint service bundles. Since May 2010, following the decrease of Bezeq’s market sharecancellation notice deals with cancellation of the private fixed-line telephony services market to below 85%, Bezeq has been permitted to offer joint service packages with its subsidiaries to private subscribers, and since July 2012, Bezeq has been permitted to offer joint service packages with its subsidiaries to business subscribers, subject to approvals bycorporate separation in the Ministry of Communications and other conditions contained in Bezeq’s license, including the following:

The joint service packages must be able to be “unbundled” so that each service included in a package must be offered separately and on the same terms;

At the time a request for approval of a joint service package is submitted, all of the services to be offered must be marketed as a package to private subscribers by a license-holder which is not a subsidiary of Bezeq, or a group that includes license holders that are not affiliated with Bezeq; and

When filing a request for marketing a bundle of services, which includes any of ISP service, international calls service or VoB service, Bezeq must allow any licensee that is capable of providing such services to offer its own services as part of Bezeq's bundle, alongside the bundle with the subsidiary (Bezeq International).

Joint service packages marketed by Bezeq’s subsidiaries that include the services of Bezeq are also subject to similar limitations, including “unbundling” (except for a bundle offered by a subsidiary that only contains its ISP service with Bezeq’s fixed-line broadband Internet infrastructure access service).

Despite the easing of the limitations on offering “unbundled” joint service packages, the Israeli Antitrust Authority informed DBS and Bezeq that the marketing of “unbundled” joint service packages by Bezeq and DBS constitute a restrictive arrangement which requires an exemption under the Israeli Antitrust Law and that the CommissionerGroup, but does not intendprovide a solution with respect to grant such exemption. Consequently, such packages were not offered. The recent merger between DBS and Bezeq resulted in new limitations regarding possible bundling, including:

Bezeq will sell and provide Internet infrastructure services and TV services under equal conditions for all of Bezeq’s customers; and
Bezeq and DBS will not have any exclusivity arrangements pertaining to TV productions that are not “original productions.”

These limitations, and in particular the “unbundling” obligation, limit the Bezeq Group’s ability to offer discounts on the componentsother aspects of structural separation. On May 2, 2012, a joint service package and effectively prevent the Bezeq Group from offering bundles, except for a bundle that contains fixed-line broadband Internet infrastructure access service and ISP service. Competing Israeli telecommunications groups are not subject to similar limitations in marketing joint service packages (other than a limitation on marketing bundles by HOT Net and other companies in the HOT Group).

Additional Limitations on Cooperation between the Bezeq Group Companies—Antitrust Laws and the Provisions of Bezeq’s Domestic Fixed- Line License

Additional regulatory provisions impose limitations on cooperation between members of the Bezeq Group including provisions of Bezeq’s domestic fixed- line license that obligate Bezeq to provide its services on an equal basis to all and to ensure that its relationships with its subsidiaries do not result in favoring them over their competitors. Bezeq is also subject to the Israeli Antitrust Law and regulatory orders issued by the Commissioner. Bezeq was declared a monopoly in its main fields of activity under the Israeli Antitrust Law, as discussed in theFair Competition and Antitrust Laws section below.

48

Wholesale Market Regulation

In May 2012, the Ministry of Communications published the Wholesale Market Policy Documentpolicy document concerning expansion of the level of competition in the fixed-line communications segment - wholesale market primarily adopting ("the main recommendations of the Hayek Committee.

The key points of the Wholesale Market Policy Document are as follows:Document") stipulates, among other things, with regard to structure separation that:-

 

Owners of universal fixed-line access infrastructures that provide retail communications services, including Bezeq and HOT, will be obligated to sell wholesale services to other telecommunications services providers, including BSA, lease of access segments, dark fibers, duct access and transmission services, on an equal and non-discriminatory basis and with no discounts for size. In this regard, a procedure was established for negotiating an agreement for these services and as soon as such agreement is signed, the infrastructure providers are required to publish a “shelf offering” for the sale of the services based on the agreement and which also includes additional services as the Ministry of Communications may determine from time to time and such services’ prices. In this regard, the term “agreement” will apply to an agreement entered into by an infrastructure owner and a substantial service provider that is not an affiliate of the infrastructure owner. When the Minister of Communications believes that an agreed term or price is (i) unreasonable; (ii) might hinder competition; (iii) might harm the public’s interest, or (iv) might harm a services provider’s interest, the Minister has the power to establish conditions or prices for the services. The infrastructure providers must submit to the relevant telecommunications services providers the information relating to distribution of their existing infrastructures, with exceptions to be defined.

If a license holder or a company affiliated with a license holder sets a tariff for a retail communications service in a manner that may hinder competition, the Minister of Communications will take measures to amend the wholesale tariff that is relevant for the provision of the retail service accordingly.

The ancillary activities, services and arrangements relating to the wholesale services (rental of space, maintenance, etc.), and the arrangements for ordering, payment terms, provisioning and their tariffs, will also be negotiated by infrastructure owners and service providers, and the infrastructure owners will be allowed to demand reasonable and non-discriminatory prices. In the absence of agreement between the relevant license holders, the Minister of Communications will determine such terms.

The Ministry of Communications will make use of a model for enforcement and supervision, which will help the Ministry of Communications to (i) ensure that the tariffs set in the shelf offering are in accordance with the conditions set out above, (ii) monitor the actual provision of the wholesale services in a reasonable and non-discriminatory manner, and (iii) track the level of implementation of the wholesale market.

Infrastructure owners will provide, on an ongoing basis, information about ordering of wholesale services and the deployment of existing infrastructure to other license holders in accordance with the requirements of the Ministry of Communications, subject to exceptions that will be determined by the Ministry of Communications.

The “shelf offering” will be published on the websites of both the infrastructure owners and the Ministry of Communications. Upon publication of such “shelf offering,” other entities (including affiliates of the infrastructure owner) may also purchase wholesale services on the same terms from the infrastructure owner, as long as such services shall be provided concurrently to any other entity, on a non-discriminatory basis. Under this procedure, Bezeq will be able to provide wholesale telephony services to its subsidiaries that are not supplied over a broadband network, provided that these services are also available to third parties without discrimination.

Within nine months of publication of the “shelfshelf offering for the sale of wholesale services, the Minister will order elimination of Communications was to eliminate the structural separation between the infrastructure provider who published the aforementionedshelf offering and the ILDinternational call providers and ISPs, that are affiliated with such infrastructure provider, replacingchanging it with anto accounting separation unless(unless the Minister believes that this will adversely affectmaterially harm competition or the public interest. As a result,interest), so that Bezeq wouldwill be able for example, to offer bundlesnon-divisible plans of its services together with these services (as opposed to plans that include localcan be unbundled, i.e. plans in which each service is offered separately and ILD services, broadband Internet infrastructure access services and ISP services.not part of a bundle, under the same terms as those offered under the plan).

 

Unbundling of the broadcasts included in the joint bundles will be reviewed and structural separation between the infrastructure providers and multi-channel TV sector will be eliminated by granting suppliers without nation-wide fixed-line infrastructure a reasonable possibility to provide a basic Internet-based TV service package.

The Ministry of Communications will determine indicators or conditions under which the Minister of Communications may conclude that the level of development of the wholesale market and the level of development of competition based on joint service packages which include fixed-line telephony and cellular telephony services in the private sector, permits the grant of relief from the structural separation between an infrastructure owner and an affiliated cellular telephony operator, or the elimination of the structural separation and its replacement with an accounting separation.

49

If the Minister of Communications determines that the wholesale market has developed and the degree of competition based on joint service packages consisting of fixed-line services and cellular telephony services in the private sector permits, the Minister will consider eliminatingan easing or cancellation of the structural separation between an infrastructure provider and a cellular telephony operator who is affiliated with such provider.has an interest in the said provider, taking note of the development of the wholesale market and competition based on joint service bundles.

In Bezeq's opinion, the policy document conditions for cancellation of structural separation were met following the launch on February 17, 2015 of a broadband wholesale market, in which various service providers operate providing end-to-end broadband services on Bezeq's infrastructure and in view of the fact that there is fierce competition in the cellular service segment and there are companies providing television services over the Internet.

Bezeq was permitted to offer subscribers joint service bundles with its subsidiaries, subject to approvals by the Ministry of Communications and several terms laid down in the Domestic Carrier license, including the following requirements:

The bundles must be unbundleable (a service included in them must also be offered separately and on the same terms).

 

The MinisterAt the time of Communications will examinesubmitting a request for approval of a bundle, there is a group of services in similar format being marketed to a subscriber as a package by a license-holder who is not a subsidiary of Bezeq, or there is a group that includes license-holders who provide a private subscriber with all the matter of the unbundling of broadcasting services included in the joint service packages which also include Bezeq services (fixed-line telephony or cellular telephony) or broadband access services. The structural separation between the infrastructure providers and multi-channel television services providers will be eliminated if there is a reasonable possibility in the Israeli market to provide a basic television service package over the Internet by service providers with no nationwide infrastructure.bundle.

 

If a wholesale market does not develop in a satisfactory manner (based on parameters to be defined for this purpose) within 24 months ofJoint service bundles marketed by the publication of the Wholesale Market Policy Document, the Minister of Communications will take action to implement structural separation between the infrastructure andsubsidiaries including the services providedof Bezeq, are also subject, according to their licenses, to similar limitations, including a requirement for unbundling (except for a bundle marketed by general domestic fixed-line license holders.

Within six months of publication of the “shelf offering,” the Minister of Communications is required to take action to change the method of control over Bezeq’s tariffs soa subsidiary that tariffs will be controlled by setting a maximum price.contains only Bezeq's Internet infrastructure service).

 

Within nine months of publication of the “shelf offering,” the Ministry of Communications is required to formulate a regulatory scheme aimed at increasing the investment in and upgrade of fixed-line communications infrastructures in Israel.

The AmendmentThese limitations, and in particular the unbundling obligation, which severely limits the Bezeq Group's ability to offer discounts on the components of the bundle, places the Bezeq Group at a competitively disadvantage as compared to the Communications Lawcompeting communication groups which are not subject to similar limitation in the Economic Arrangements Law, July 2013 expands the powersmarketing joint bundles (other than a limitation on marketing a joint bundle of HOT-Net and other HOT Group companies,). Bezeq's limitation is more significantly manifested with implementation of the Minister of Communications to oversee competition in the era of a wholesale market. The Minister of Communications was empowered (by the Minister of Finance) to determine payments for a license holder to use Bezeq installations operated by another license holder, to establish maximum or minimum tariffs for a license holder’sBSA services and this, in part, based on cost plus a reasonable profit or on a benchmark point derived from parameters prescribed in the law. The Minister may also request a report onoption for ISPs to provide end-to-end services to customers at reduced prices compared with the tariffs before services commence, he may instruct the tariffunbundleable bundles that a license holder may ask for a service, and may instruct the license holder to take action to prevent an immediate infringement of the competition. The amendment also prescribes provisions concerning a basic package of broadcasts, its content and payment for the package.Bezeq can market.

 

In accordanceWith respect to the terms of the agreement for bundles of Internet infrastructure services together with ISP services marketed by Bezeq, on January 1, 2017, the policy documentMinistry of Communications notified Bezeq that it must make changes to the current bundle format and cancel the section in the agreement prohibiting ISPs from making commercial use of the customer data that Bezeq has collected and transferred to them. Otherwise, the approval granted to Bezeq to market a joint service bundle will be canceled. On March 27, 2017, the Ministry of Communications notified Bezeq that it would not approve Bezeq’s request to market a joint service bundle with DBS, given that the Ministry will, in the near future, be completing several regulatory measures that will allow a more complete implementation of the wholesale market reform, including the regulation of telephony resales, new regulations relating to Bezeq’s retail tariffs, regulation of a mechanism to reduce profit margins and regulation of the conditions for marketing reverse bundles. According to the Ministry’s notice, it is willing to review requests for joint service bundles which include telephony and TV, in at least six months’ time, after it has examined the effect of the aforementioned measures on the expansionmarket and is certain that Bezeq satisfies the regulatory requirements. In its notice, the Ministry reiterated its intention to review, subject to a hearing, the cancellation of competition, the structural separation which is currentlyobligation in placethe Bezeq Group and to examine regulations that will gradually be phased out. Nevertheless,replace the Minister's power to imposeexisting structural separation also applies vertically (between services rendered to subscribers and services rendered toregime, in a license holder), andmanner that could affect the directive may be applied if a wholesale market does not develop at all, or problems emerge in the developmentmarketing of such a market, in part due to price discrimination, high entry barriers, etc.joint service bundles.

 

The following actions were subsequently taken by the Ministry of Communications:

In January 2014, the Ministry of Communications issued a list of the services that Bezeq will be obligated to offer as a wholesale service to the service providers. The list of services included: managed broadband access (Bitstream Access) (for a countrywide, regional or local connection); Sub Loop Unbundling (at this stage only on the Bezeq network); use and access to Bezeq’s physical infrastructure, and wholesale telephony service.
In November 2014, the Minister of Communications issued a decision on the regulation of wholesale services and the format for the provision of wholesale services and the setting of rates for these services on Bezeq’s network.
The Minister of Communications adopted the recommendations of the Ministry’s professional echelon to amend the licenses of Bezeq and Hot Telecom and to detail the basket of services covered by the license - managed broadband access (including Multicast) and wholesale telephony service. These services must be provided within 3-6 months from the date of the decision. The regulations that were included in the Minister’s decision define the obligation to provide the services, including accompanying services and the maximum tariffs for these wholesale services to be provided by Bezeq (to date, no tariffs have been prescribed for HOT Telecom’s services).

 5045 

 

 

In accordance withThere are other limitations on cooperative ventures between Bezeq and Bezeq Group companies, both under the Minister’s decision,antitrust laws and conditions laid down by the tariffs are as detailed below:

  2015  2016  2017  2018  Unit 
Access service – excluding telephony  32.56   32.70   32.87   33.21   NIS per line per month 
Access service – including telephony  39.43   38.53   38.80   39.13   NIS per line per month 
Subloop unbundling service (or SLU)  19.34   20.04   20.74   21.47   NIS per line per month 
Data transfer service on the network’s core  30.36   24.11   18.73   14.18   NIS per MB per month 
Data transfer in multicast configuration1  15,517   12,267   9,456   7,236   NIS per MB per month 
Creating a phone call  0.01   0.01   0.01   0.01   NIS per minute 
Access service to the duct2  398   398   400   400   NIS per km per month 
First dark fiber on a line  484   484   487   485   NIS per km per month 
Additional dark fiber on a line (up to a total of 4 fibers)  2.18   2.14   2.11   1.99   NIS per km per month 
Technician house call service  158   158   158   158   NIS per visit 

Antitrust Commissioner in approvals of mergers between Bezeq and Bezeq Group companies, which prohibit discrimination in favor of Bezeq Group companies when providing certain services, and pursuant to the provisions of Bezeq's license, which requires it to provide its services equally to all.

 

1)The price for reaching customers connected to a maximum of 1,000 MSAG boxes. The prices for greater numbers of MSAG boxes are stated in the draft regulations.
2)Including access to pits, boxes and poles.

Lifting of the restrictions on structural separation and waiving the limitations applicable to cooperative ventures between the Bezeq Group companies, may provide the Bezeq Group with various opportunities to utilize synergies or the facilitate utilization of such synergies.

Implementation of

Recently a wholesale market petitionmodel has started being implemented in Israel. The model includes the obligation imposed on Bezeq and HOT, owners of a country-wide fixed-line access infrastructure, to sell wholesale services to other communications operators.

Wholesale services

The wholesale services were established pursuant to the Supreme Courtpolicy document in which the Minister of Communications adopted the main recommendations of the committee appointed to review and revise the structure of Bezeq's tariffs and to set wholesale telephonyservice tariffs in the communications segment (Hayek Committee). The policy document states, among other things, that owners of country-wide fixed-line access infrastructures who provide retail services, including Bezeq, will be obligated to sell wholesale services to holders of telecommunication licenses on a non-discriminatory basis and with no discounts for size. The document also stipulates the terms for cancellation of the structural separation and that within six months of publication of the Shelf Offering for the sale of wholesale services by the infrastructure owners, the Minister of Communications will take action to change to a method of oversight of Bezeq's prices by setting a maximum price and within nine months and that the Ministry of Communications will formulate regulations aimed at increasing the investment in and upgrading fixed-line communications infrastructure in Israel.

Further to the policy document, the Ministry of Communications established service portfolios setting out the format for provisions of the services by the infrastructure owners. The maximum tariffs that Bezeq is permitted to charge for these services were determined by the Minister of Communications with the agreement of the Minister of Finance in the Communications (Telecommunications and Broadcasts) (Use of a Domestic Carrier’s Public Network) Regulations, 2014 ("the Use Regulations"). No tariffs for HOT's wholesale services have been set as yet.

BSA services

In December 2014, Bezeq petitioned the Israeli Supreme Court to repeal the decision and as a result, to cancel the amendment of Bezeq's license, cancel the regulations prescribing the obligationstarted to provide theBSA services on February 17, 2015. This service allows service providers that do not own infrastructure to offer their customers full end-to-end Internet services, including Internet connectivity services and the maximum tariffs for the wholesaleinfrastructure services and to schedule an urgent hearingof Bezeq. Since launching of the petition.service, hundreds of thousands of customers have switched to receiving services through these service providers who rely on Bezeq’s infrastructure..

 

In the initial period of provision of the service, the Ministry conducted an oversight proceeding regarding Bezeq, which led to the imposition of NIS 8.5 million in fines. Bezeq paid the fines and submitted a petition with the court against this proceeding. Disputes erupted between Bezeq argued thatand the decision was unreasonableservice providers regarding implementation of the service portfolio. These disputes concerned the recruitment and impossiblemovement of customers, the payments owing to implement. Bezeq also argued thatfor the decision-making process was improper.service and the use of routers leased by Bezeq to its customers.

 

The Ministry held hearings on various issues related to implementation of Communications held discussions with Bezeq and the relevant operators with respect to operating the service and in February 2015, issued various appendices to the BSA wholesale service file. Following their issuance, Bezeq began to provide wholesale services. Until May 2015, customers were transferred from retail subscribers to wholesale subscribers in a non-automated procedure (a manual procedure requiring involvement of Bezeq's staff). Thereafter, the transfer was automated and does not require human involvement.

In March 2015, the Supreme Court ruled that it would hold a round table discussion with Bezeq and the State of Israel to examine Bezeq’s arguments (professional or technical in nature) in order to clarify topics, if possible, and make the necessary amendments, and that a notice from Bezeq and the State of Israel should be submitted within 60 days.

In May 2015, the Minister, the Minister of Finance and the Ministry of Communications submitted an update notice to the Supreme Court, indicating that after holding meetings with Bezeq following the Supreme Court ruling, the Ministry of Communications reached the conclusion that wholesale telephone services can technically be implemented by Bezeq and if Bezeq had made prior preparations, there would have been no technical obstacle to opening the wholesale market in this segment on the scheduled date of May 17, 2015. With regard to the economic aspect, the Ministry of Communications concluded that Bezeq's arguments that the tariffs are unreasonable were unacceptable. However, after reexamining Bezeq's claims, it ascertained that certain changes should be made regarding the demand for data consumption and the quality requirementsservice. Some of the service defined in the service file (which, in the Ministry's opinion, do not affect the tariffs), including the Ministry's intention to publish a market-wide hearing and not to enforce the service quality requirements at that stage.

Thereafter, Bezeq submitted an update notice on its behalf where it rejected the State's update notice and noted that contrary to the State's conclusions: (1) the different solutions proposedhearings were initiated by the Ministry for provisionimplementation of telephony servicesits policy, some stemmed from the disputes regarding implementation of the service and others derived from Bezeq's petition to the court prior to launching the service. The results of the hearings may affect the service tariffs and Bezeq's competitive position in the market.

The main hearings on the matter dealt with mechanisms for reviewing and revising the forecast for demand for the purpose of updating the wholesale market are not technologically possible; and (2)tariffs (in which a decision was made regarding reduction of the tariffs prescribedof the BSA service component), revising the service level (SLA) requirements, and the procedure for movement of customers between operators, etc.

On November 17, 2014, a hearing was published on the subject of determining the format for reviewing a margin squeeze by the fixed-line broadband network owners: According to the hearing, the infrastructure owners will be required to send any marketing proposal for review by the Ministry of Communications for provisionand the Ministry will notify the infrastructure owner within 14 days whether it prohibits marketing of the package due to fears of margin squeeze. This review mechanism and the resulting restriction on prices for retail services, if and insofar it is applied, may affect Bezeq's ability to propose marketing offers for its wholesale services from the time to market services are unreasonable. Bezeq also arguedperspective and the prices that the Ministry of Communications had not completed the meetings to examine Bezeq's claims, as requested by the Supreme Court, and retained its decisions, so they remained unreasonable. An engineering opinion by an external expert and an economic opinion of an internal economist (together with an external comparative study indicating that the wholesale price in European countries on which the Ministry relied is more than double the price prescribed by the Ministry in Israel) were attached to Bezeq's update notice.it can offer. To date, no decision has been published.

 

On October 8, 2015, the Ministry of Communications filed a notice to the Court, according to which, without derogating from its position, it believes that due to the importance it places on the ability of the service providers to offer services to their subscribers immediately, including telephony services, and in order not to allow continued delay in provision of this service, it was formulating a hearing in which it intends to publish as soon as possible, with respect to compelling Bezeq to provide telephony services to the service providers for resale and to establish the maximum tariffs for provision of this service. In the notice, the Ministry noted that it was a different wholesale service which also Bezeq believes does not require any preparations or changes in its engineering systems. Therefore, it could be offered immediately and is offered as a temporary solution for a limited period of a year.

 5146 

 

 

On October 11, 2015, a hearingWholesale service use of the petition was held in which, due, among other things, to the Ministry's notice regarding publication of a new hearing, the Court dismissed the petition insofar as it relates to wholesale telephony services and ruled that update notices would be submitted on the subject of tariffs, which is still pending.

On December 10, 2015, the Ministry of Communications published a hearing regarding "the supply of telephony services for resale on Bezeq's network." A draft amendment to Bezeq's general license adding telephony services in a resale format was attached to the hearing document.

The service allows a general unified license holder that is entitled to provide domestic fixed-line services to purchase telephony services from Bezeq, to allow outgoing and incoming calls, and provision of accompanying and added value services by Bezeq wherever possible without the service provider being able to distinguish that it is receiving services through Bezeq, other than with respect to technical support. In this regard, the service provider will be able to build packages to be sold to its subscribers in any manner.

At the hearing, it was stated that the Ministry is considering allowing Bezeq to offer the service as a temporary interim solution for a limited period of a year from adoption of the decision at the hearing, after which Bezeq will provide wholesale telephony services, and also that the temporary arrangement will apply as long as Bezeq is obligated to provide telephony as a product that can be unbundled, and it will also be canceled (and Bezeq will be compelled to provide wholesale telephony) if maximum tariffs for Bezeq's retail services are prescribed in place of the tariffs set out in the payment regulations. It was also stated at the hearing that the service will be provided immediately after establishment of the operating arrangement with the service providers, since provision of the service does not require any preparations or changes in Bezeq's engineering systems, but only in its IT systems.

The following tariffs were presented at the hearing:

PackageWholesale payment (derived from the retail price less VAT)
Speak 100NIS 23.03
Speak 300NIS 28.15
Speak 600NIS 35.85
Speak 750NIS 38.41
Speak 1000NIS 46.10

The above payments include payments for interconnection for calls to Bezeq subscribers, and in addition, the service provider will pay an interconnection fee for outgoing calls from its network for every subscriber of another operator other than Bezeq's subscribers. The service provider will also be eligible to payment for every incoming call.

Excess minute price - NIS 0.0923 per call minute.

Payment for additional services - the payment prescribed in bundles is decreased by 40%.

On January 10, 2016, Bezeq submitted it response to the hearing, according to which it is impossible to determine that after a certain period (or upon establishment of maximum tariffs or cancellation of the unbundling obligation) the service format anchored in the service file will apply automatically, since the format is impossible to implement and postponing it will not lead to a solution. The only way that Bezeq would be able to provide the service in the service file format entails switch replacement and compelling Bezeq to perform a complex, disproportionate unauthorized and unjustified procedure. Moreover, a wholesale telephony service in the service file format is essentially unnecessary and unjustified (as testified by the various arguments for the service, each of which was concealed and another raised in its place) and all its aspects deviate from the global trend. With regard to the price of the service, it is clarified that it is inappropriate to reduce it by 40%, since it is a resale service with almost no costs to the telecommunication providers or savings for Bezeq and that the standard discount rate worldwide is between 10% and 20% maximum. It is further clarified that the "Kav Kal" (light line) is irrelevant and cannot be included in the resale arrangement and that interconnection fees will only be paid for outgoing services to another network and will be received for incoming calls from another network not belonging to Bezeq. It was further clarified that they are aimed at improving the cooperation between Bezeq and the service providers.

52

On January 11, 2016, the State submitted an update notice to the Court, which does not contain anything materially new compared with the previous update notice, and stipulates that the Ministry intends to review making fundamental changes in two issues raised by Bezeq (the issue of data consumption demand forecasts and the service quality requirements defined in the BSA and telephony service file). In view of the contents of the notice, the State requested dismissal of the petition and charging Bezeq for the expenses.

On February 7, 2016, Bezeq submitted a revised notice on its behalf, according to which the tariffs of the wholesale services set out by the Ministry of Communications are unreasonable and lack jurisdiction. Bezeq petitioned the Court to issue a conditional order, as set out in the petition. Due to the contents of the revised documents, the Court scheduled a hearing for the file.

Imposition of finesphysical infrastructures

 

In the initial wholesale BSA service implementation period, the Ministry of Communications held supervisory proceedings against Bezeq claiming that Bezeq breached some of the provisions set out mainly inPursuant to the service attachments issued as described aboveportfolio that entered into force on the eve of the reform. On May 11,July 31, 2015, Bezeq received the Ministry of Communications' notice of its intention to impose fines regarding implementation of the broadband reform (the “Notice"), claiming that according to the supervision report attached to the notice, the Ministry discovered that Bezeq fails to comply with the provisions set out in the service file as required and that this conduct by Bezeq is a breach of an addendum to the Communications (Telecommunications and Broadcasts) Law, 1982. Therefore, the Ministry stated that it intends to impose a fine of NIS 11,343,800, which is the maximum amount possible under the law. Bezeq rejected the notice and submitted counterclaims, including its rejection of the groundless statements and declarations in the notice regarding the failings of the reform and the impairment to competition. Bezeq presented the Ministry's unreasonable behavior and the update of the service file without jurisdiction, ignoring the complexity of the non-automated procedures and the time allocated to them.

Subsequently, on December 16, 2015, Bezeq received a demand for payment of a fine of NIS 8.5 million. On January 31, 2016, Bezeq filed an administrative petition against imposition of this fine.

Use of terminal equipment in the wholesale market

On December 30, 2015, the Ministry published an administrative instruction regarding the use of wholesale terminal equipment and a draft agreed arrangement sent for a response on August 31, 2015, according to which until February 17, 2016, a service or infrastructure provider who lends or leases terminal equipment to a subscriber and that subscriber switches to another service provider under the BSA service file, will not prevent the abandoning subscriber from making regular and proper use of the terminal equipment, will under no circumstances limit and will allow the abandoning subscriber to make such use of the terminal equipment in its possession ("Transition Period") and as from February 18, 2016, will not prevent or limit and will allow such use for 21 business days from the switch notice. The payment will be made by the abandoning subscriber in the same way as previously made prior to switching service providers. In its decision, the Ministry also determined that the service or infrastructure provider may not restrict the use of terminal equipment previously sold to the former subscriber.

Passive wholesale services (physical infrastructures and SLU)

On January 27, 2015, Bezeq received the Ministry of Communications ruling regarding regulation of the wholesale services - service files, access to physical infrastructures and service loop unbundling (SLU) prescribing that Bezeq must start providing these services beginning August 1, 2015.

The Director General of the Ministry of Communications noted in his decision that while the obligation of the infrastructure owners to provide wholesale services toallows service providers was already prescribed, a ruling regarding the duty of reciprocation (between thewithout infrastructure owners) is an initial decision, and since the Authority is committed to exercising restraint in making decisions regarding all those matters for which action is not especially pressing or urgent, it was appropriate for this matter to be determined by the next government.

The Minister of Communications' decision of November 17, 2014 set out the passive service tariffs, while the volume and content of the services have yet to be determined. Bezeq petitioned the Supreme Court to cancel the tariffs.

Bezeq allows use of its physical infrastructures - access to passive infrastructure (pits, tubes, communication cabinets, over ground network, etc.), available-for-transfer communication cables or use ofcable infrastructure and available dark fibers out of Bezeq's available optic cables, while incables. In order to connect the service provider's infrastructure to Bezeq's infrastructure, the service provider must set up a passive infrastructure (pit, cross-connect cabinet, connection box, etc.) near Bezeq's passive infrastructure facility. A

In a letter dated July 6, 2016, the Ministry of Communications announced its decision that the infrastructure work will be performed by Bezeq or several companies whose services Bezeq uses in exceptional cases in coordination with it, as opposed to a situation in which the service providers without infrastructure that use Bezeq's infrastructure perform the work. In another letter, it was clarified that these provisions will also apply with respect to the use of Bezeq's infrastructure by infrastructure owners.

Due to a dispute erupted between Bezeq and oneanother communication provider regarding the use of Bezeq’s physical infrastructure for its cellular requirements, the Ministry of Communications clarified its position that provision of the service is not conditional to the manner of use by the service provider and in fact rejected Bezeq's position that the wholesale market services are designated exclusively for the fixed-line market. Bezeq provides the service accordingly.

In the amendment to the Communications Law, as applied in the Economic Arrangements Law, a licensed domestic carrier must allow other licensed domestic carriers (which are not necessarily license holders without infrastructure) access to its passive infrastructure (excluding the passive infrastructure of a licensed domestic carrier owned by IEC and which it requires, for the purpose of its operations as the holder of a critical service provider license) for performance of any telecommunications operation and provision of any telecommunications service under its license. This means allowing IEC and HOT Telecom to use Bezeq's passive infrastructure beginning October 1, 2017 at tariffs to be set by the Minister of Communications with the agreement of the Minister of Finance by April 1, 2018. Until these tariffs are set, the tariffs published in the Use Regulations will apply. Once these tariffs have been set, settling of accounts will be made between Bezeq and HOT Telecom only.

Bezeq began to provide wholesale services to service providers in the beginning of 2015 and as of the end of 2016, the number of Internet lines provided on a wholesale basis on the Company's network was 377,000, or approximately 24% of the all Bezeq’s subscribers. Bezeq estimates that 17% of the fixed-line Internet subscribers in Israel use the wholesale BSA services.

Wholesale telephony service

The policy document states that Bezeq will be able to provide a wholesale telephony service to its subsidiaries that are not supplied over a broadband network, provided that these services are also available to everyone without discrimination. The Ministry of Communications' decision document regarding the optionlist of usingwholesale services dated January 15, 2014 includes a telephony service, however, the physical infrastructuresBSA service portfolio (dated November 17, 2014) includes a wholesale telephony service to be provided beginning May 17, 2015 at significantly lower tariffs than Bezeq's telephony services.

On December 29, 2014, Bezeq petitioned the High Court of Justice claiming, among other things, a lack of jurisdiction and inapplicability of the wholesale telephony service in the format included in the BSA service portfolio. In response, the Ministry of Communications argued that there is technological applicability for the service portfolio format, in accordance with the solutions offered after Bezeq filed its petition. These solutions were rejected by experts on Bezeq's behalf as partimpossible to implement.

On December 10, 2015, the Ministry of this service for cellular subscribers. Measures are also being taken to test the SLU service with Cellcom, and Bezeq conducts meetings and tours with interested service providers forCommunications announced a hearing regarding provision of a telephony service in a different format to the services.wholesale format. The resale service allows a domestic carrier with a unified license to purchase telephony services from Bezeq, allowing outgoing and incoming calls and provision of accompanying and added value services by Bezeq (as opposed to the wholesale service in which the call also passes through the license holder's switch), as a temporary interim solution for a period of one year from adoption of the decision at the hearing, after which Bezeq would provide a wholesale telephony service. In reference to the possibility of returning to the wholesale telephony service portfolio, Bezeq stressed that the format in the service file could not be applied automatically, since it was impossible to implement, unjust and contradicts global trends. Bezeq indicated that the only way that Bezeq could provide the service in the service portfolio format would require a switch replacement and would cause Bezeq to perform a complex, disproportionate, and seemingly unauthorized procedure that could not be justified. At the hearing, the tariffs for the telephony service (in the resale format) were presented. The tariffs were derived from the retail price of Bezeq's tracks and reflected a discount of 40% compared with Bezeq's tariffs. Bezeq argued that the discount was unfair as the standard discount rate worldwide is a maximum of 10% to 20%. No decision or new hearing has been published by the Ministry of Communications as of yet.

 

 5347 

 

 

With respectDue to the SLU service - according to the administrative instruction, Bezeq provided Cellcom and Partner (under secure conditions) with informationMinistry's notice regarding the geographic location of certain of its facilities and sites. The instruction will apply with regard to this type of information delivery to every unified general domestic carrier license holder wishing to receive it from Bezeq as part of preparations to implement the wholesale SLU service

Hearing regarding establishment of a format for reviewing a margin squeeze by the fixed-line broadband network owners

On November 17, 2014, Bezeq received a Ministry of Communications hearing aimed at establishing policy and means of control to prevent a margin squeeze - a situation where the infrastructure owners reduce their retail prices and minimize the margin between their retail prices and wholesale pricepublication of the infrastructure input purchased byforegoing hearing, on October 11, 2015 the service providersHigh Court of Justice dismissed Bezeq's petition insofar as it relates to a level that erodes the margin of the service providers to the point of being economically unfeasible to continue their operations.

According to the hearing, the infrastructure owners will be required to send every marketing offer to the Ministry of Communications for review and the Ministry will inform them within 14 days whether they are prohibited from marketing the package because of the concern of a margin squeeze. Bezeq sent its response to the hearing document. This review mechanism and the derived restriction on determining retail service tariffs, if implemented, may impair Bezeq's ability to market offerings of its wholesale telephony services.

 

With respectBezeq estimates that implementation of the wholesale telephony service may adversely affect its results of operations and financial condition. At present, there is uncertainty as to the effectdate of implementation of the wholesale market, as atservice and its characteristics. Accordingly, Bezeq is unable to estimate how it will implement the end of 2015, there were 250,000 wholesale lines in Bezeq's network. Implementation of wholesale telephony services for resale according to the outline of the hearing may increase the churn rate of Bezeq's BSA service subscribers and implementation of the transition to using Bezeq's physical infrastructures may lead to increased competition in the data communication segment by launching of services that compete with those of Bezeq using these infrastructures. These lines also include lines which were not originally in Bezeq's network (new or from a competitor's network). Bezeq believes that 11% of the fixed-line subscribers in Israel are part of the wholesale BSA services.service.

 

Cancellation of Structural Separation

In Bezeq's opinion,Additional regulatory aspects relevant to the Ministry of Communication must retract the structural separation applicable to it for the following reasons: (i) the conditions set out in the competition expansion policy document were met; (ii) there exists an intense competition in the cellular service segment; and (iii) and there areentire Group or several Group companies providing television services over the Internet.

 

Merger with DBS

Until March 25, 2015, Bezeq held 49.78% of the shares of DBS and it also owned stock options which entitled it to acquire 8.6% of the shares of DBS. In view of a decision of the Supreme Court in 2009 not to approve the merger of Bezeq and DBS, Bezeq ended its control in DBS and from August 21, 2009, it ceased to consolidate the operations of DBS in its financial statements and its investment in DBS was presented according to the equity method. The balance of DBS shares were held by Eurocom D.B.S. (A company controlled (indirectly) by Messrs. Shaul and Yossef Elovitch, controlling shareholders of Bezeq and our company).

On March 26, 2014, the Antitrust Authority issued a decision permitting the merger between Bezeq and DBS under certain conditions.

A sub-committee of the Board of Directors of Bezeq was appointed to deal with the topic, and the Audit Committee and Board of Directors as well as a General Meeting of the shareholders of Bezeq approved the transaction between Bezeq and Eurocom DBS to acquire all the holdings of Eurocom DBS in DBS, which represented 50.22% of the issued share capital of DBS (41.62% on a fully diluted basis) as well as all the shareholders’ loans that Eurocom had provided to DBS (NIS 1,538 million as at December 31, 2014). It was also decided that prior to the purchase of the Eurocom interest, Bezeq and DBS would accept the merger conditions established by the Antitrust Authority and Bezeq would exercise its option to acquire 8.6% of the issued share capital of DBS for no consideration. On March 25, 2015, Bezeq exercised the option to acquire 8.6% of the issued share capital of DBS, resulting in its holding 58.4% of the issued share capital of DBS. Subsequently, Bezeq received notice from the Antitrust Authority of the cancellation of the limitations that were imposed on Eurocom Group with respect to its holdings in DBS.

On June 23, 2015, approval was received from the Minister of Communications to transfer the means of control in DBS in such manner that Bezeq will control DBS and will hold the entire issued and paid-up capital of DBS. On June 24, 2015, Bezeq acquired the shares of DBS held by Eurocom and Eurocom assigned to Bezeq its entire rights in the shareholders’ loans that it had provided to DBS in consideration of NIS 680 million. Upon completion of the transaction, DBS became a wholly owned subsidiary (100%) of Bezeq.

In addition to the cash payment of NIS 680 million, Eurocom D.B.S. will be entitled to two additional contingent payments consisting of: one additional payment of up to NIS 200 million payable in accordance with the tax synergy that may be generated from the transaction and an additional payment of NIS 170 million that will be payable upon the business results of DBS reaching certain milestones in the next three years.

54

The Concentration Law-Limitations on the Allocation of Rights in Public Assets

The Concentration Law establishes a procedure that governmental authorities are required to follow when granting rights (such as a license, franchise or an agreement with the State of Israel, or the State, for the operation of essential infrastructure) in “Essential Infrastructure Fields” to an entity that is a “Concentrating Entity.” “Essential Infrastructure Fields” include activities for which certain telecommunication licenses are required (excluding a specialized domestic operator (such as a VoB operator) and radio and cellular phone operator), broadcast licenses, various types of licenses in the energy field, water production, natural resources and other areas.

A “Concentrating Entity” is an entity that will be included in the list of concentrating entities that will be promulgated under the Concentration Law, which will include, among others, a significant non-finance company - a corporation or group whose sales turnover exceeds NIS 6 billion, or NIS 2 billion in a monopoly market, or whose total credit exceeds NIS 6 billion, as well as an influential entity in the field of broadcasting or printed media (including, among others, newspapers and publishers, broadcasters, news producers, cable and satellite television broadcast licensees).

On December 11, 2014, the Antitrust Authority published the list of concentrated entities according to the law. Bezeq, the corporations it controls and that are controlled by its controlling shareholders, and DBS are all included on the list and are considered "concentrated entities."

The Concentration Law contains provisions according to which a governmental authority is entitled to not grant rights in an Essential Infrastructure Field to a “Concentrating Entity,” after finding that not granting such rights is unlikely to cause significant harm to the relevant field and its regulation. A governmental authority may not award, and may not determine conditions for the award of rights, in Essential Infrastructure to a “Concentrating Entity,” before considering control concentration factors and consulting the Committee for Reducing Concentration that will be established in accordance with the Concentration Law, which must, in turn, provide its opinion within a period of 60 days from the governmental authority’s referral. The governmental authority and the Committee are obliged to consider, among other things, factors concerning the prevention of the expansion of the operations of the “Concentrating Entity.”

The extension of existing licenses in an Essential Infrastructure Field for a cumulative period exceeding ten years will be considered an “award of rights” and will, therefore, be subject to the foregoing provisions. In addition, the procedure described above will also apply to the grant of approval for the transfer to a “Concentrating Entity” of means of control of companies held by the State or that were previously State-owned companies (such as Bezeq).

The foregoing provisions were effective in December 2014, except that the provisions concerning the extension of existing licenses will become effective December 2017.

In addition, a governmental entity must consider factors relating to the promotion of an industry’s competitiveness when awarding certain types of rights, which include rights in “Essential Infrastructure” as well as licenses for fields of activity that are not considered as Essential Infrastructure if the number of workers in the industry subject to the award of rights is restricted. The Commissioner will publish a list of rights whose award may have a significant impact on competition and an entity will be required to consult with the Commissioner before awarding any of the listed rights.

Consumer Protection

Changes in consumer legislation regularly affect the operations of Bezeq and its subsidiaries. The Bezeq Group is subject, among other things, to the Israeli Consumer Protection Law and regulations promulgated thereunder. The Israeli Consumer Protection Law allows consumers to cancel transactions and to disconnect from on-going services and requires service providers to obtain the express consent of a customer to continue the service after the end of an initial term of the contract. The Israeli Consumer Protection Law also sets forth provisions concerning a refund of charges that were collected from subscribers not in accordance with the terms of the agreement with them, as well as a maximum waiting time for a human response in call centers. In addition, a number of pending legislative proposals provide for additional consumer protection and may affect the conduct of Bezeq and its subsidiaries with their subscribers.

Limitation on the Exit Fees a License-Holder May Collect From a Subscriber

Under the Israeli Communications Law, fixed-line telephony subscribers, ILD subscribers and pay television subscribers whose average monthly bill is less than NIS 5,000 and who entered into an agreement after August 8, 2011 cannot be charged exit fees, nor can the subscriber be denied a benefit that he or she would have received had he or she not terminated the agreement. Commencing November 8, 2011, the amendment also applies to subscribers who entered into agreements before the amendment became effective and subsequently cancelled their agreements. In addition, a telecommunications license-holder may not demand immediate payment of the balance owed for terminal equipment in the event of cancellation of the agreement.

55

Similar provisions applied to cellular telephony operators with respect to subscribers with a certain number of phone lines. In April 2012, an amendment to the Israeli Communications Law was published, eliminating exit fees for cellular telephony customers that hold up to 100 phone lines and who entered into agreements with the cellular telephony operator subsequent to November 1, 2011.

In October 2013, the Ministry of Communications delivered to Bezeq an initial inspection report stating that Bezeq prevents subscribers that terminate their agreement with Bezeq from receiving a refund for terminal equipment (routers), allegedly in violation of the provisions of the Israeli Communications Law. Bezeq submitted its response to the Ministry of Communications objecting to the initial determination reflected in the inspection reports. We believe that Bezeq acts lawfully.

Interconnect Tariffs and Royalties

The Communications Law states that a holder of a license for providing telecommunication services will pay royalties to the State out of its revenues from the services enumerated in the Regulations. The Royalties Regulations obligate the various license holders (including Bezeq, Pelephone, Bezeq International, DBS and B.I.P.) to pay royalties on certain specified revenues. Over the last few years, the rate of the royalties has been gradually reduced, and in accordance with the amendment to the Royalties Regulations that is applicable to the Bezeq Group, commencing in 2013, 0% royalties applied to all of the license holders.

Change in interconnect tariffs

tariffs.The Group’s telecom companies (Bezeq, Pelephone and Bezeq International) pay interconnect fees to other carriers for calls that are terminated on the networks of those carriers, and some of them (Bezeq and Pelephone), receive interconnect fees for calls that are terminated on their networks and from international communications operators for outgoing calls on their networks.

In 2011, The interconnect fees are determined by the tariff payable to cellular operators was decreased substantially andMinistry of Communications as the maximum tariffs in 2012 the tariff payable to domestic carriers was reduced significantly. The changesinterconnection regulations. Changes in the interconnect tariffs have an offsetting effect at the Bezeq GroupGroup's level, as a resultin view of the decrease intheir impact on both the expenses and revenues of Bezeq and its subsidiaries.

 

Restriction of the exit penalty a license-holder can collect from a subscriber

Pursuant to several amendments tosubscriber.Under the provisions of the Communications Law, most of which became effective in 2011, the following restrictions apply to the Bezeq Group’s companies with respect to the collection of disconnect fees when certain subscribers cancel an agreement

Holdersholders of domestic carrier licenses, ITS licenses and broadcast licenses, (includingincluding Bezeq, Bezeq International, DBS and B.I.P.)B.I.P, may not collect disconnectdisconnection fees from subscribers who cancel agreements if their average monthly bill is less than NIS 5,000. Additionally, license holders may not withhold5,000, or deny them a benefit from a subscriber that they would have been givenreceived had they not ended the agreement not been terminated and they may not demand immediate repayment of any outstanding payments for terminal equipment if the agreement is canceled. Bezeq believes that these legislative amendments have led to an increase in the churn rate.

agreement. Cellular operators, (including Pelephone)including Pelephone, may not collect disconnect fees from customers who hold up to 100 phone lines and who entered into an agreement with the license holder. Beginning on January 1, 2013, the cellular operators may notor condition a contract for cellular services on an agreement to purchase, rent or lease terminal equipment (“unlocking”).equipment. As a rule, these restrictions make customer retention difficult for the communications operators that are subject to them.

 

No discriminationNon-discrimination in the offering of benefits and special tariffs

On October 31, 2010,tariffs.Due to the Director General ofdifferent positions expressed by the Ministry of Communications sent a clarifying document toin the cellular operators on the applicability ofpast, communications companies may be restricted under certain clausescircumstances in their licenses that address equality and discrimination, including the offense of discriminating against subscribers belonging to the same group of subscribers by offering special benefits and tariff plans.

In its position submitted to the Tel Aviv District Court in January 2014, as part of a number of class actions that were consolidated against several communications operators, the Ministry of Communications stated that the licenses of the ISPs do not permit them to offer their customers “individualized tariff plans” tailored to the needs of individual customers and their ability to “haggle.”offer benefits and that they must offerspecial tariffs to their new customers or to prevent a standard price for each service package, subjectsubscriber from switching to certain exceptions.

On April 30 2015, the Ministry of Communications clarified its opinion with respect to "individualized tariff plans", "packages" or "service bundles" marketed to new subscribers, indicating that a new subscriber is someone who at the time of the inquiry to the license holder did not have an agreement with the license holder. Therefore, license holders may not demand a "waiting period" from anyone wishing to recontract with them and they must allow anyone to join any plan under the terms offered to new subscribers. In addition, according to the clarification, all subscribers have the option of switching between the different plans offered at the time of the request, without discrimination, including plans marketed to new subscribers. However, this clarification does not lessencustomers. The Ministry of Communications announced its intention to hold a hearing regarding revision of the license holders' right to determine switching terms.

56

Administrative Enforcementprovisions of the licenses regarding price discrimination between subscribers in a manner that is also consistent with the changes and developments in the market.

 

During 2011, the Israeli Securities Law was amended,Amendments of licenses and during 2012, the Israeli Communications Law and the Israeli Antitrust Law were amended. All the amendments introduced administrative enforcement procedures and authorized the relevant regulators to impose monetary sanctions for violation of these laws, the regulations promulgated thereunder and regulatory orders issued thereunder. Administrative enforcement was also introduced to labor laws with theadditional legislation of the Enforcement of Labor Laws Law, 2011.

Copyright/Trademark Laws

Israel grants copyright protection to original literary, dramatic, musical and artistic works, as well as sound recordings and computer programs under the Israeli Copyright Law. Copyright protection automatically exists with respect to works which comply with the terms set forth in the Israeli Copyright Law and generally runs from the date of creation until the end of the seventieth year after the year of the death of the author.

In Israel, trademarks are governed by the Trade Marks Ordinance (New Version), 1972. A trademark registration is valid for 10 years from the date of the trademark application and the registration may be renewed for further periods of 10 years after each renewal. The Bezeq Group has numerous registered trademarks and trademark applications, see “Description of our Business—Intellectual Property.”

 

Hearing About Call Center Waiting Timesabout call center waiting times.

On August 18, 2014, the Ministry of Communications published hearings with respect to the communicationsfor communication license holders including holderson the subject of cable and satellite licenses, telecommunications, fixed communications, virtual operators and ISPs, relative toregulating the response timestime of callthe telephone service and support call centers, that serve private and business subscribersincluding the definition of the license holders. The mainobligations of human responses, a series of other provisions, in the proposed amendments determine a maximum average waiting time and its measurement; the possibility to leave a telephone number to receive a return call; operation of specific malfunctions centers throughout all hours of the day and a customer service call center for 13 hours (in DBS, 15 hours a day); access to service centers via toll-free numbers; submission and publication of reports and service data on the website of the license holders; definition of a menu for human and automated responses; possibility to cancel a service by phone; recording of calls in all call centers; and a memorandum for the amendment ofto amend the Communications Law, that determines awhich prescribes compensation without proof of damage in the eventneed to prove loss if the response time in the call centers is higherlonger than defined,that prescribed, and compensation for overcharge for an amount up to 10 times the amount overcharged.overcharges. Responses to the hearing opposing the arrangements proposed were submitted. There have been no developments on the subject to date. If the proposed arrangement is approved an increase in the operationformat prescribed in the hearings, the operating costs of the Bezeq Group’s call centers is expected.of the Bezeq Group companies may increase.

 

Amendment of Licenses Relativelicenses to Ensure Operational Continuityensure operational continuity of Communication Companiescommunication companies in Emergenciesemergencies.

On March 1, 2015, the licenses of communications operators were amended, including the licenses of Bezeq, Pelephone and B.P.I. In accordance withAccording to the amendment,amendments, the license holders must comply with minimum requirements to ensure operational continuity in emergencies. Operational continuity includes a(a business continuity plan and network disaster recovery plan) in the event of emergencies. On November 1, 2016, the Ministry of Communications published a planhearing for further amendments to the licenses, including provisions concerning the installation of supporting infrastructure on core sites. Bezeq submitted its comments to the hearing.

Consumer legislation.Changes in consumer legislation affect the operations of the Bezeq Group companies on a regular basis. Various amendments have been made in recent years to the Consumer Protection Law and regulations, concerning the cancellation of transactions even after service has begun, disconnection from on-going services, the need for the recoverycustomer to give express consent to continue transactions after the end of the networkspecified period and sending of messages, provisions concerning a refund of charges collected from the subscribers which are not in accordance with the communication agreement plus fixed handing charges prescribed in the Law, restrictions on debt collection procedures, maximum waiting time for a disaster.human response, and extension of the visiting times of technicians at the subscribers' homes. Various bills have also been tabled in the Knesset introducing further amendments to the Consumer Protection Law which may affect the terms of customer agreements and the conduct of the Bezeq Group companies towards their subscribers.

Enforcement and financial sanctions.Over the last few years, the Communications Law, the Antitrust Law, the Securities Law and the Consumer Protection Law were amended, giving regulators powers of enforcement, supervision and imposition of graded fines for violation of these laws or regulations and their provisions. Likewise, the Law to Increase the Enforcement of Labor Laws was enacted. This legislation affects the way in which the Bezeq Group companies manage their affairs, in part with respect to concern about the imposition of sanctions and their ability to protect themselves.

48

The Ministry of Communications has begun to make wide use of its authority to supervise and provide notices of its intention to impose fines for ongoing regulatory matters and issues related to implementation of the wholesale market. Bezeq sent the Ministry of Communications its response to the supervision documents and notices regarding the imposition of fines. In some instances, the Ministry of Communications rejected Bezeq's position and imposed fines.

Restrictions on providing credit to business groups.Powers were granted to the Minister of Finance and the Governor of the Bank of Israel to promulgate regulations and provisions limiting the cumulative credit that financial institutions in Israel may give to a corporation or business group (a group of companies under joint control and their controlling shareholder).

Restrictions on the allocation of rights in critical infrastructures to a highly concentrated entity.The Market Concentration Law prescribes a special, restrictive procedure that must be applied prior to the allocation of rights (such as a license, franchise, contractual agreement with the State to operate a critical infrastructure and in certain circumstances also to extend existing licenses) in those areas that are defined as a “critical infrastructure” to entities that are defined as a “highly concentrated entity.” In this respect,regard, a list of areas was defined that will be deemed “areas of critical infrastructure”, including operations for which certain communications licenses are required (domestic carriers, excluding a specialist domestic carrier (such as VoB operators and cellular operators), broadcast licenses, and other areas. Bezeq, the license holders must implementcompanies that it controls and that are controlled by its controlling shareholder are included in the list published by the Antitrust Authority and are considered highly concentrated entities. The procedure prescribed in the law in relation to the allocation of a work planright to a highly concentrated entity will also apply to approval given for transferring the means of control in state-owned companies or companies that includeswere previously government companies (Bezeq included) at the rates defined in the law, to a risk assessment,highly concentrated entity.

The provisions of this law became effective in December 2014, although the provisions relating to extending the validity of existing licenses, will go into effect in December 2017. This law may adversely affect the Bezeq Group’s ability to enter new areas of activity as well as serviceits current operations.

Restrictions on creating charges on the assets of Group companies.The Communication Law, the Communication Order (which applies to Bezeq), and recovery objectives. Furthermore, the amendment to the licenses includes provisions relative to the management's and Board of Directors' responsibility, emergency management, preparation of personnel for each area of operation to enable operational continuity, as well as provisions relative to security of information systems, back up and survivabilitysome of the networkcommunications licenses of Bezeq Group companies, contain restrictions on granting rights to a third party on assets used to provide the critical service or on the assets of the license, as the case may be, including the need to obtain regulatory approval to create charges on these assets. In some cases, such as Pelephone's cellular operator's license, and Bezeq International's unified license, there are exceptions permitting the creation of charges in favor of banks without the need for advanced approval, provided that the charge agreement includes instructions to ensure that the services rendered under the license will not be affected if the bank exercises the charge. In addition, under the provisions of the law and the infrastructure (including electricitycommunications licenses, the license and energy), agreements with vendorsthe resulting rights are not transferable and subcontractors,they cannot be pledged or confiscated (with certain exceptions).

Bezeq has provided undertakings to certain financing entities not to pledge its assets without simultaneously creating a charge of the same class, rank and more.amount (negative charge) in favor of those financing entities, subject to specific exceptions. DBS created a floating charge on all its assets and a fixed charge on certain assets, whose conditions include, restrictions on the creation of additional charges without obtaining the consent of the holder of the charge.

 

Bezeq

 

Control of Bezeq’s tariffs

The control of Bezeq's tariffs as described below has a number of implications. Bezeq's tariffs are subject to regulatory intervention and from time to time, Bezeq is exposed to significant changes in its tariff structure and tariff levels. The review mechanism for the controlled tariffs, as defined in the authorizing legislation and the regulations, results in a real average erosion of the tariffs over the years. Control of the tariffs could make it difficult for Bezeq to provide an appropriate and competitive response to market changes and to offer competitive prices on short notice. Furthermore, the restrictions on granting discounts on tariffs limit Bezeq in participation in certain tenders.

The following are the main control arrangements over Bezeq's prices:

Under the Communications Law, the Minister of Communications is entitled, with the approval of the Minister of Finance, to determine payments (including maximum payments or minimum payments) for services from a license holder. The payment can be determined on the basis of (1) the cost, according to the calculation method instructed by the Minister plus a reasonable profit; or (2) reference points deriving from: payment for services provided by the license holder; payment for comparative services; payments in other countries for such services.

The competition expansion policy document stipulated that within six months of publication of the Shelf Offering (for the sale of wholesale services), the Minister will take action to change the method of oversight of Bezeq's prices so as to be controlled by the setting of a maximum price. Negotiations are being conducted with the Ministry of Communications in this matter.

49

The tariffs for Bezeq’s controlled services (telephony and others) which are fixed in the regulations, were updated in accordance with a linkage formula less an efficiency factor provided in the regulations, so that on average, Bezeq's controlled tariffs have eroded in real terms. In the last three years, the prices in the regulation have not been updated and the date of the update has been postponed. Under the provisions of the regulations and the relevant temporary orders, the postponement will be taken into consideration in the next update.

The Ministers of Communications and Finance are authorized to prescribe interconnect payments or for the use by a license holder of the telecommunication facilities of another license holder, and to provide instructions.

If tariffs that are neither at the maximum nor minimum levels are determined for supervised services, Bezeq may offer an alternative payments package for a bundle of telecommunication services at such fixed payments, provided that the Ministers of Communications and Finance do not oppose the package. The Gronau report states that an alternative payment package will be approved only if it is worthwhile for 30% or more of subscribers who use the services offered in the package, and that the smaller the market share of the Bezeq Group in fixed-line telephony is, the higher the maximum discount rate permitted in an alternative payment package will be.

If maximum or minimum payments are determined according to Sections 5 or 15 the Communications Law, for telecommunication services provided to another license holder, Bezeq may indiscriminately offer any other license holder an alternative payments package for the bundle of services at maximum or minimum payments, and such services together with services for which payment has not been determined according to Sections 5 or 15 to the Law, provided the Ministers are not opposed or approved the package.

Bezeq may request a reasonable payment for a service for which a payment is not determined according to Sections 5 or 15, or for which a maximum or minimum payment has been determined. The Minister of Communications may require Bezeq to notify him of any payment Bezeq intends to request as set out above and of any change in the payment prior to the provision of the service or the change. If the Minister of Communications determines that Bezeq intends to request an unreasonable payment, or a payment that raises suspicion of harming competition, the Minister may set (for a period not exceeding one year) the maximum payment it may request for the service or separation of the payment for the service from the payment for the bundle of services.

Bezeq's Domestic Carrier license

Bezeq operates under a Domestic Carrier license which enumerates the services Bezeq must provide and its duty of universal service. Bezeq is required to provide its services to all on equal terms for each type of service, irrespective of location or unique cost. While the license is unlimited in time; the Minister may modify or cancel the license or make it contingent. The license and any part of it cannot be transferred, no charge can be imposed on it, nor can it be subject to attachment.

Bezeq is required to maintain and operate the network and provide its services at all times, including in emergencies, in an orderly and proper manner according to the technical and service quality requirements, and to work towards improving its services. The license includes a Service Standards for the Subscriber appendix, which is to be amended after Bezeq provides the Ministry with data. Bezeq submitted its proposals for amendment of the appendix to the Ministry, adapting it to the current state of affairs and the licenses of other operators, but the amendment report has not yet been published.

Provisions are stated for the duty of interconnect to another public switching network and the option of use by another license-holder; a duty to provide infrastructure services to another license-holder on reasonable and equal terms is also provided, as well as refraining from preferring a license-holder that is a company with an interest.

Provisions have been made for the operation of Bezeq's network in times of emergency, including the obligation to operate it in a manner that prevents its collapse in emergencies. Bezeq is required to provide telecommunication services and set up and maintain the terminal equipment infrastructure for the security forces in Israel and abroad, as provided in its agreements with the security forces. Bezeq is required to appoint a security officer and to comply fully with the security instructions contained in the appendix to the license. Bezeq provides special services to the security forces. Bezeq is required to ensure that each purchase and installation of hardware in its telecommunications installations, except for terminal equipment, will be made in full compliance with instructions given to Bezeq according to Section 13 of the Communications Law.

Extensive reporting duties to the Ministry of Communications are imposed on Bezeq. In addition, the Director General of the Ministry of Communications has the authority to enter facilities and offices used by Bezeq and to seize documents.

50

The Domestic Carrier license includes restrictions on the acquisition, maintenance and transfer of means of control pursuant to the Communications Order and on cross-ownership, which are mainly a ban on cross-holding by entities in which those with an interest in a another material Domestic Carrier as noted in the license, and restrictions on a cross-holding by entities with Domestic Carrier licenses or general licenses in the same segment of operation.

Bezeq submitted a bank guarantee of US$ 10 million to the Director General of the Ministry of Communications tor secure fulfillment of the terms of the license and for indemnifying the State for any loss it incurs due to their violation by Bezeq. The Director General at the Ministry of Communications is authorized to impose a fine for violation of any of the terms of the license.

During a calendar year, Bezeq may invest up to 25% of its annual income in activities not intended for providing its services (the incomes of Bezeq’s subsidiaries are not considered income for this purpose).

The Communications Order

 

Bezeq was declared a provider of essential telecommunicationstelecommunication services under the Communications Order. By virtuepower of that declaration, Bezeq is required to provide certain types of services and may not interrupt its provision of such servicescease to provide them or narrow them. Among these services are basic telephony services,telephone service, infrastructure services,service, transmission servicesservice and data communication servicesservice including interconnect, and other services listed in the schedule to the Communications Order.

The main provisions of the Communications Order are:are these:

 

LimitationsRestrictions on the transfer and acquisition of Meansmeans of Control,control in a company, which includes a prohibitionban on holding “significant influence” over Bezeq or 5% or more of Meansmeans of Controlcontrol of a certain kind without the prior written approval of the Ministers. Transferring, holdingPrime Minister and the Minister of Communications, or acquiring control in Bezeq requires the approval of the Ministers by means of a control permit. Any unauthorized holding or acquisition is referred to as “Exceptional Holdings.” Exceptional Holdings must be sold within the periods prescribed by the Communications Order. Nationality requirements were established for the controlling shareholder in Bezeq. For more information see “Regulatory—Regulations of Control Over Bezeq—Permit to Control Bezeq Granted to Members of the Eurocom Group.”

57

A duty to report to the Ministers upon demand is imposed on Bezeq with respect to any information on matters relating to provision of an essential service.

75% of the members of the Board of Directors of Bezeq must be Israeli citizens and residents who have security clearance from the General Security Service.

The Chairman of the Board of Directors of Bezeq, the external directors (within the meaning of the Israeli Companies Law), the chief executive officer, the deputy chief executive officer and other office-holders in Bezeq as listed in the Communications Order, must be Israeli citizens and residents and have a security clearance appropriate to their functions.

The approval of the Ministers is required for the grant of rights in certain assets of Bezeq (switches, cable network, transmission network and data bases). In addition, the grant of rights in Means of Control in the subsidiaries of Bezeq, including allotment of more than 25% of the shares in a subsidiary, requires the approval of the Ministers.

 

Provisions were established forTransfer or acquisition of control in a company requires the protectionapproval of computerized systems and the purchaseMinisters. The Control Permit establishes the minimum holding percentage in each of hardware and software.the means of control in Bezeq by the holder of the Control Permit. A transfer of shares or an issuance of shares that causes the ownership percentage of the Control Permit holder to fall below the minimum percentage is prohibited without the prior approval of the Ministers, subject to permitted exceptions (among them are an issuance to the public under a prospectus or sale or private placement to institutional investors).

 

Holdings not approved will be considered "exceptional holdings" and the Order states that exercise of a right by power of exceptional holdings will not be valid. The Order also contains provisions authorizing the Ministers and Bezeq to submit an application for the enforced sale of exceptional holdings to the courts.

At least 75% of the members of the Board of Directors of Bezeq must be Israeli citizens and residents who have security clearance and security compatibility as determined by the General Security Service. The Chairman of the Board, the external directors, the CEO, the Deputy CEO and other office-holders in Bezeq as listed in the Order, must be Israeli citizens and residents and have security clearance appropriate to their functions.

"Israeli" requirements are laid down for the controlling shareholder in Bezeq: for an individual – he is an Israeli Entity (as defined in the Order); for a company – it is incorporated in Israel, the center of its business is in Israel, and an Israeli Entity holds at least 19% of the means of control in it.

The approval of the Ministers is required for granting rights in certain assets of Bezeq (switches, cable network, transmission network and data bases and banks). In addition, grant of rights in means of control in subsidiaries of Bezeq, including allotment of more than 25% of the shares in the subsidiary, requires the approval of the Ministers.

Certain actions of Bezeq require the approval of the Minister of Communications, including voluntary liquidation, a settlement or arrangement between Bezeq and its creditors, a change or reorganization of the structure of Bezeq and a merger or split of Bezeq.

The ongoing management of Bezeq and the center of its business must be in Israel, and Bezeq’s board and shareholder meetings must be held in Israel.

Bezeq’s Domestic Fixed-Line License

Bezeq was granted a general domestic fixed-line license for an unlimited period. The principal provisions of the license include:

Scope of license-Bezeq must provide its services to all on equal terms for each type of service, irrespective of the location or unique cost. The Minister of Communications may modify or cancel the license or make it contingent. The license and any part of it cannot be transferred, no charge can be imposed on it, nor can it be subject to attachment.

Structural separation-Bezeq must operate under the principles of structural separation (see—The Bezeq Group—General—Structural Separation”).

Marketing joint service packages—Bezeq may request permission to market joint service packages, subject to certain limitations (see “—The Bezeq Group—General—Limitations on Marketing Bundles”).

Tariffs-If Bezeq provides a service or package of services for which no tariff is set under the Israeli Communications Law, such service or services must be offered at a reasonable price to all, without discrimination and at a uniform tariff.

Operations of networks and service standards-Bezeq is required to maintain and operate its network and provide its services at all times, including at times of emergency, in an orderly and proper manner commensurate with the technical requirements and the nature of the service, and to work towards improving its services on an ongoing basis. The license includes an appendix, “Service Standards for the Subscriber,” which is to be amended after Bezeq provides the Ministry of Communications with data. Bezeq submitted its proposal for an amendment to the appendix, adapting it to the current state of affairs and the licenses of other operators, but the amendment has not yet been adopted.

Duty to provide services-Bezeq is required to provide interconnect services to other public switching networks and to allow other telecommunications license holders to use its network. Bezeq has a duty to provide infrastructure services to other telecommunications license holders on reasonable and equal terms and must refrain from providing preferable terms to its affiliates. Bezeq is also obliged to provide some of its telecommunications services to the entire public in Israel. According to the Ministry of Communications’ interpretation of this provision and the provisions regarding the provision of infrastructure services to license-holders, Bezeq is also obliged to provide infrastructure and transmission services to competing communications operators for services which compete with those of Bezeq.

Security arrangements-Bezeq’s license includes provisions relating to the operation of its network in times of emergency. Bezeq is required to design and operate its network in a manner that will prevent its collapse in an emergency. Bezeq provides special services to the security forces and is required to provide telecommunications services and maintain terminal equipment infrastructure for the security forces in Israel and abroad, as provided in its agreements with the Israel Defense Forces. Bezeq is required to appoint a security officer and to comply fully with the security instructions contained with the applicable provisions in its license.

58

Supervision and reporting-The license imposes on Bezeq extensive reporting requirements to the Ministry of Communications. In addition, the Director General has the authority to enter the facilities and offices used by Bezeq and to seize documents.

Revocation of the License-Pursuant to the Israeli Communications Law and the provisions of Bezeq’s license, the Minister of Communications may revoke the license in certain events, including, among others, in the event of a material breach of the license by Bezeq or an immaterial breach of the license that was not cured in accordance with the instructions of the Minister of Communications, in the event that certain insolvency or liquidation proceedings are initiated against Bezeq, failure to comply with certain instructions provided under the Israeli Communications Law or to perform the services in an adequate manner, or if the public interest requires the revocation of the license.

Miscellaneous:

The license includes limitations on the acquisition, maintenance and transfer of Means of Control pursuant to the Communications Order, as well as on cross-ownership, which are mainly a prohibition on cross-holdings by entities with an interest in another material domestic fixed-line licensee, and limitations on cross-holdings by entities with domestic fixed-line licenses or general licenses in the same segment of operation.

Bezeq is required to prepare a draft of the standard agreement it plans to offer to subscribers and to submit them for the review by the Director General upon demand. The Director General has the authority to instruct that changes be made. Bezeq is in the process of preparing such an agreement.

Pursuant to the requirement of the license, Bezeq provided a $10 million bank guarantee to secure its fulfillment of the terms of the license and to indemnify the State of Israel against any loss it may incur due to violations. The Minister of Communications may declare the guarantee or part of it forfeit based on the terms of the license.

The Director General has the power to impose a monetary sanction for violation of any of the terms of the license.

During a calendar year, Bezeq may invest up to 25% of its annual income in activities not connected with the provision of its services (the income of its subsidiaries is not considered income for this purpose). The Minister of Communications is authorized to grant a variance from that percentage.

Fair Competition and Antitrust Laws

Provisions prohibiting Bezeq from engaging in anti-competitive practices can be found in its domestic fixed-line license, in the various communications regulations and in the Israeli Antitrust Law.

Bezeq was declared a monopoly under the Israeli Antitrust Law in its main fields of activity, including basic fixed-line telephony services, provision of communications infrastructure services, transfer and transmission of broadcasting services to the public, provision of high-speed access services through its access network to subscribers and provision of high-speed access services for ISPs through a central public telecommunications network.

In October 2010, Bezeq began to provide infrastructure and transmission services to competing telecommunications operators following an examination carried out by the Ministry of Communications. In October 2011, the Israeli Antitrust Authority informed Bezeq that the Commissioner was considering issuing a ruling to the effect that Bezeq had violated the provisions of the Israeli Antitrust Law by, among other things, not providing fixed-line infrastructure and transmission services for telephony and Internet services to its competitors, Cellcom and Partner.

On October 16, 2013 and October 5, 2014, the Minister of Communications, publishedincluding the voluntary liquidation, a hearing document regarding new regulation in the international communication services market. According to the proposed regulation, any domestic fixed-line carriersettlement or cellular operator will be able to provide international communication services as part of the service packages offered to subscribers. The proposed regulation also includes the provision of international data communication and transmission services by domestic fixed-line carriers and cellular operators. Bezeq sent its response to the hearing supporting the proposal under different terms. However, on February 1, 2015, the Ministry published a secondary hearing regarding special regulation for Bezeq Group and HOT Group for the interim period until cancellation of the structural separation obligation in these groups, according to which Bezeq and HOT will only be able to provide these services through other operators. Bezeq objected to the proposed change.

59

On November 16, 2014, Bezeq received the decision of the Deputy Commissioner of the Antitrust Authority finding that Bezeq had abused its position as a monopoly and determined unfair purchase and sale prices of a service in a monopoly, in contravention of the Antitrust Law, in that it determined prices for Internet and telephony services that were lower than the prices Internet for infrastructure only, in a campaign in which it had offered new subscribers a special introductory six month rate. The Commissioner claimed that given that the Internet access infrastructure service is a critical input for the supply of Internet-based telephony services, then the price set by Bezeq places competitors who wish to offer this service at a disadvantage, as the price of the critical input for supply of the service was higher than the price of the final service which Bezeq offered its customers.

On March 31, 2015, Bezeq filed an appeal against the Antitrust Tribunal's decision, together with an affidavit and the opinion of an expert economist, pursuant to which Bezeq requested the Court to find that the decision is null and void or alternatively to order its cancellation. In the appeal, Bezeq claimed that there was no "negative margin", that the decision ignored various tests for existence of a negative margin and margin squeezes, that under the circumstances of the matter there is no concern for harm to competition, that there was no actually harm to competition and that there was no breach of any sections of the Antitrust Law. Bezeq also pointed out a breach of administrative duties of the authority while forming the decision and its very publication, which must also lead to cancellation of the decision. On September 8, 2015, the Commissioner's response to the appeal was submitted, in which the Court was requested to dismiss the appeal and leave the decision intact.

Bezeq has adopted an internal compliance procedure containing guidelines and an internal reporting and control system in order to make sure that the activities ofarrangement between Bezeq and its employees are carried out in accordance with the provisionscreditors, a change or reorganization of the Israeli Antitrust Law.

Controlstructure of Bezeq’s Tariffs

Bezeq’s telephony tariffsBezeq, a merger and certain other tariffs are prescribed in regulations. As a resultsplit of a deliberate regulatory policy, the monthly usage tariff for a fixed-telephone line is set at a level that does not cover the costs involved in providing it (a situation known as “accessibility deficit”). This deficit has been reduced over the years, but still exists. The tariffs are updated according to a formula set forth in the regulations. Bezeq’s controlled tariffs are reviewed by a public committee every few years, at which time Bezeq is exposed to material changes in its tariff structure and tariff levels. The mechanism for the update of the tariffs has resulted in the erosion of the tariffs over time.

Control of the tariffs creates or could create difficulties for Bezeq in providing an appropriate and competitive response to changes in the market and in offering competitive prices on short notice. In addition, the restrictions on granting discounts on tariffs limit Bezeq’s ability to participate in certain tenders.

Under the Israeli Communications Law, Bezeq may apply to the Minister of Communications and the Minister of Finance, for an approval for an alternative payment package for a set of services for which tariffs are prescribed in the regulations, subject to certain conditions. Unless either the Minister of Communications or the Minister of Finance announces his objection within the period set forth in the Israeli Communications Law, Bezeq may offer the alternative payment package.

Under the Israeli Communications Law, a telecommunications license holder can demand reasonable payment for a telecommunications service for which the tariff is not set in the regulations. Bezeq sets the tariffs for these types of services.

Deployment of Communications Facilities

The deployment and manner of set-up of communication facilities in Israel are regulated by the NOP 36 and NOP 56. These plans were designed to ensure coverage for transmitting and receiving radio, television and wireless communications, while avoiding radiation hazards, minimizing damage to the environment and simplifying and increasing the efficiency of the processes involved in setting up new facilities.

Part A of NOP 36 deals with guidelines for erecting small and miniature broadcasting installations. Bezeq has obtained building permits for most of its small broadcasting installations in accordance with NOP 36A. From time to time, a need arises to add broadcasting installations which require that building permits be obtained in accordance with NOP 36A. Given the exemption granted under the orders of the Planning and Construction Law and of the Israeli Communications Law, we believe that Bezeq is not obliged to obtain building permits for miniature broadcasting installations, which are “wireless access facilities” under those laws. There are a number of initiatives to cancel this exemption, and its cancellation could have materially adverse implications, including making it difficult for Bezeq to provide universal service as required by the provisions of its license.

NOP 56 became effective in June 2008 and regulates the manner of construction and licensing of communications facilities in the Palestinian Administered Territories. NOP 56 has transition provisions for facilities erected with a permit for small installations. The guidelines also include a requirement for obtaining a communications license and the receipt of necessary consents from the Commissioner of Government Property at the Civil Administration. Bezeq has obtained licenses for 76 installations in the Palestinian Administered Territories and is in the process of obtaining licenses for an additional five installations in the Palestinian Administered Territories.

60

As a result of a process initiated by the State of Israel, IBC, a third fixed-line communications infrastructure company was established, 40% of which is held by the government-owned IEC and 60% of which is held by a consortium of non-government companies that was selected by the IEC in a tender procedure in June 2013. In August 2013, IBC was granted a general license for the provision of telecommunications infrastructure services (including data services, digital transmissions and VPN) via fiber optic networks. According to the license, IBC will enter into an agreement with the IEC to use the IEC’s fiber optic network in Israel to provide wholesale products to telecommunication services providers. In addition, IBC was granted a five-year special license to provide wired domestic data communications services, according to which it is entitled to provide IPVPN services and broadband data communications services.Bezeq.

 

Authority with respect to real estate

Pursuant to the provisions of Section 4(F) of the Communications Law, the Minister of Communications granted Bezeq certain powers in connection with real estate.estate, as set out in Chapter Six of the Law. The law distinguishes between land owned by the State, the Development Authority, the Jewish National Fund, a local authority or a corporationcompany lawfully established and owned by one of them, and a road ("Public Land"), and other land ("Private Land"). With regard to Public Land, Bezeq and any person authorized by it, can enter it to perform network deployment and perform work there,maintenance works and to provide telecommunication services, provided that approval forthe deployment is executed according to the provisions of the network has been granted byPlanning and Construction Law. The amendment to the Communications Law and the Planning and Construction Law in the Economic Arrangements Law cancel the duty to obtain the approval of the local Planning and Construction Committee.Committee, so certain actions do not require a building permit if performed by a license holder that was granted powers under section F of the Communications Law, if carried out according to an approved plan.

51

A network on Private Land will be deployed according to the provisions of the Planning and Construction Law and requires the consent of the landowner, the lessee in perpetuity or the protected tenant, as the case may be. Under the provisions of the Telecommunications (Installation, operationOperation and maintenance)Maintenance) Regulations, 1985, if Bezeq is of the opinion that providing a telecommunications service to an applicant requires the installation of a telecommunications device for transmission or switching on the applicant's premises (or in shared premises or common property)premises), Bezeq is permitted tomay request that the applicant, as a prerequisite for providing the requested service, allocate a suitable place on the premises for installation of the device, for the sole use of Bezeq, and it may use the device to provide service to other applicants also.as well.

 

Deployment of a network on Private Land requires the consent of the landowner, the lessee in perpetuity or the protected tenant, as the case may be. Pursuant toUnder the provisions of the Planning and Construction (application(Application for a permit,Permit, its termsTerms and fees)Tees) Regulations, 2010,1970, an applicant for a permit to erectconstruct a residential building has a dutyis required to install infrastructures for telephone, radio, television and Internet services so that the customer can choose whichever provider it prefers. In commercial buildings, if preparations for communications are installed, an underground infrastructure must be laid. At the same time, Bezeq's license was amended (as were the licenses of HOT Telecom and DBS), so that if Bezeq uses the internal wiring (part of the access network installed in residences and in apartments intended to be used by those residences only) for providingprovision of its services, it is obliged to provide maintenance services for that internal wiring (the portion of the access network installed in residences and in apartments, and which is aimed to be used by those residences only), installed by the permit’spermit applicant, without this granting it any proprietary rights in the internal wiring.

On Pursuant to the hearing published on May 7, 2015 on the subject of wiring in residential buildings, the Ministry of Communications published a hearing regarding wiring in residential buildings, in which it determined that a building permit holder must install three leads (pipes) from the border of the property to the building communication cabinet, and for IBC's complaints regarding a lack of free leads, that is the Ministry is considering determining that the Bezeq Group and HOT will each use one lead between the property border and the building communication cabinet and floor communication cabinets and that they will vacate leads in existing buildings and make adaptations due to IBC's demands under certain circumstances. Bezeq submitted its position, which opposes such determinations, among other things, due to a lack of justice, proportionality and need. The Ministry is holding a "round table" discussionround table with Bezeq, DBS, HOT and IBC to reach an arrangement regarding installation of infrastructure in new buildings.

 

Immunity and exceptions to liability

The Minister of Communications granted Bezeq immunity from certain liabilities for damages listed in Chapter Nine of the Communications Law, in accordance with his authority to grant immunity to a general license-holder. In addition, Section 13 of the Communications Law contains exceptions to criminal and civil liability for an act done in fulfillment of a directive to provide services to the security forces in that section.

Regulations and rules under the Communications Law

Regulations in three additional and important areas currently apply to Bezeq: (1) cessation, delay or restriction of telecommunications actions and services; (2) installation, operation and maintenance; and (3) ways of supervising the actions of the license-holder.

Antitrust laws

The Antitrust Commissioner declared Bezeq a monopoly in the following areas:

Basic telephone services, provision of communications infrastructure services, and transfer and transmission of broadcasting services to the public.

Provision of high-speed access services through the access network to the subscriber.

Provision of high-speed access services for ISPs through a central public telecommunications network.

The Commissioner's declaration of Bezeq as a monopoly constitutes prima facie evidence of its content in any legal proceeding, including criminal proceedings.

Bezeq has adopted an internal compliance procedure containing internal rules, guidelines and an internal reporting and control system, the purpose of which is to ensure that the activities of Bezeq and its employees are carried out in accordance with the provisions of the Antitrust Law.

In connection with the approval of the merger of Bezeq and Pelephone, restrictive terms were imposed, mainly prohibiting discrimination in favor of Pelephone in the supply of a product in which Bezeq is a monopoly, prohibiting the bundling of the supply of certain products by any of the companies when purchasing products or services from the other, and restrictions on certain joint activities.

In connection with the approval of the merger of Walla and Bezeq, terms were imposed restricting discrimination in favor of Walla against its competitors.

On October 11, 2011, the Antitrust Authority informed Bezeq that the Commissioner was considering the issuance of a ruling in accordance with his powers under Section 43(A)(5) of the Antitrust Law, that Bezeq had abused its position in contravention of the provisions of Section 29A of the Antitrust Law. The notice stated that the Commissioner was considering stipulating that Bezeq refused to provide transmission services for the provision of telephony and Internet services to Cellcom and Partner. In accordance with the decision of the Ministry of Communications, Bezeq provides infrastructure and transmission services to both Cellcom and Partner.

52

On November 16, 2014, Bezeq received the decision of the Deputy Commissioner of the Antitrust Authority pursuant to Section 43(A)(5) of the Antitrust Law, to the effect that Bezeq had abused its position as a monopoly and determined unfair purchase and sale prices of a service in a monopoly, in contravention of the provisions of Section 29A to the Antitrust Law 1988 in setting a negative margin by determining lower prices for Internet and telephony services than for Internet infrastructure only, in a campaign. The decision states that these prices places competitors who wish to offer this service at a disadvantage. Bezeq filed an appeal with the Antitrust Tribunal against the decision.

The Telegraph Ordinance

The Telegraph Ordinance regulates the use of the electromagnetic spectrum, and applies, inter alia, to Bezeq’s use of radio frequencies as part of its infrastructure. The set-up and operation of a system that uses radio frequencies is subject, under the Telegraph Ordinance, to grant of a license, and the use of radio frequencies is subject to the designation and allocation of a suitable frequency. The Telegraph Ordinance imposes license fees and fees for the designation and allocation of frequencies. The Government deals with the shortage of radio frequencies for public use in Israel (among other reasons, due to the allocation of a large number of frequencies for security purposes), by limiting the number of licenses granted for the use of frequencies, and providing incentives for efficient use of frequencies.

Setting up communications facilities

The National Outline Plan for communications, NOP 36 (within the Green Line) and NOP 56 (in the Administered Territories), were designed to regulate the deployment and manner of set-up of communication facilities in a way that would ensure coverage for transmitting and receiving radio, television and wireless communications, while avoiding radiation hazards and minimizing the damage to the environment and the landscape, and also to simplify and increase the efficiency of the processes involved in setting up the facilities.

The classification of the facilities according to their technical variables and physical dimensions, which affect the determination of safety ranges for protection against the effects of radiation and the extent to which they protrude on the landscape, determine which facilities will be included in Part A of the NOP 36 and which in Part B of the Plan.

Bezeq has erected and is erecting broadcasting facilities and wireless communication facilities for providing broadcasting services to its customers, and uses such communication facilities, mainly for providing services to areas that are not connected to the fixed-line communications infrastructure (remote areas or new towns).

NOP 36A.Part A of NOP 36 deals with guidelines for erecting small and miniature broadcasting installations. Bezeq has obtained building permits for most of the small broadcast installations in accordance with NOP 36A. From time to time, a need arises to add broadcast installations which require that building permits be obtained in accordance with NOP 36A. Given the exemption granted under the orders of the Planning and Construction Law and of the Communications Law, Bezeq believes that it is not obliged to obtain building permits for miniature broadcasting installations, which are “wireless access facilities” under those laws.

Since 2008, a draft amendment to NOP 36A (NOP 36/A/1) has been tabled. The draft amendment mainly deals with changing the guidelines for the licensing of small and miniature broadcast installations, including determination of different licensing tracks (fast and standard) depending on the location and the public safety range of each installation, and indemnification arrangements for compensation claims under Section 197 of the Planning and Construction Law. If adopted, the draft amendment may give rise to practical difficulties which could impede Bezeq's ability to provide the public with some of the services it is required by law to provide.

NOP 36B.Part B of NOP 36 contains guidelines for setting up large broadcasting facilities. In the January 2008 draft plan (which was presented to the government for approval in August 2010, but is yet to be approved), the definition of a large broadcast facility was changed so that the licensing of broadcast facilities which prior to the proposed amendment were classified as large, would be according to NOP 36/A/1 (if and when approved). The change in definition for small and large broadcasting facilities may give rise to practical difficulties which could impede Bezeq's ability to provide the public with the services it is required by law to provide.

The January 2008 draft contains a transition provision which is expected to allow the grant of a license for existing broadcast installations even if they do not meet the requirements of NOP 36B, subject to certain terms and restrictions, provided that they are in compliance with the safety restrictions described in the Plan. The January 2008 draft also proposes to include a provision requiring the permit applicant (including for existing sites) to provide the local committee with a deed of indemnity for compensation under Section 197 of the Planning and Construction Law, if a court rules against the committee.

53

NOP 36B has not yet been approved by the government and there is no certainty as whether it will be approved. As mentioned above, at this stage, before publication of the final text of the NOP, Bezeq is unable to estimate the full impact of the amendments on Bezeq.

NOP 56.NOP 56 came into force in June 2008, and regulates the manner of erection and licensing of communications facilities in the Administered Territories. The Plan contains transition provisions for facilities erected with a permit for small installations. The Plan also includes a requirement for production of a communications license and receipt of the consent of the Commissioner of Government Property at the Civil Administration.

Bezeq has arranged licensing for 76 installations in the Administered Territories, and is in the process of licensing the remaining five installations in the Administered Territories. Moreover, in November 2016, Bezeq received a notice from the Civil Administration (Communications Staff Officer) that it must also organize the licensing of facilities on the customer's premises (as opposed to the foregoing facilities in Bezeq's possession). Bezeq estimates that this means obtaining licensing for dozens of sites and it is reviewing its position on the subject.

Exemption from a Permitpermit to Add Antennasadd antennas to Existing Lawful Broadcasting Facilitiesexisting lawful broadcasting facilities.

On August 1, 2014, the Planning and Building (Works and Buildings that are Exempt from a Permit) Regulations, 2014, entered into effect. These regulations provide that theThe addition of an antenna to an existing, lawful broadcasting facility is exempt from a permit, subject to meeting a combination of conditions and exclusions, includingwhich are set out in the Planning and Building (Works and Buildings that itare Exempt from a Permit) Regulations, 2014. Bezeq is consistent withtaking the plans and applicable spatial instructions, to be determined by the local planning committees. Bezeq beganrequired steps to add antennas to its broadcastingbroadcast facilities according to the mechanism set out in these regulations.

Pelephone

Statutory provisions relating to the environment applicable to Pelephone's operations

The broadcast sites used by Pelephone are "radiation sources" as defined in the Non-Ionizing Radiation Law. The erection and operation of these sites, excluding those listed in the addendum to the law, requires a radiation permit.

The law prescribes a two-step licensing mechanism for obtaining a radiation source operating permit under which the applicant first applies for a permit to construct a radiation source, or the Erection Permit, which may be in effect for no more than three months and may be extended by the Commissioner for up to nine months, then for a permit to operate the radiation source, or the Operating Permit, which has term of five years or as otherwise determined by the Minister for Environmental Protection.

The issuance of an Erection Permit is contingent upon the assessment of the maximum radiation levels to which human beings and the environment are expected to be exposed from the radiation source when in operation, including in the event of a malfunction, and the required measures for limiting the levels of exposure of human beings and the environment to the expected radiation from the radiation source when operating, including implementation of technological means that are in use, or the Limiting Measures.

The issuance of an Operating Permit is contingent upon application of the Limiting Measures and to measuring the levels of exposure of human beings and the environment to the radiation generated while the radiation source is operating. The law further provides that the Operating Permit is contingent upon presentation of a license under the Communications Law and in certain cases, a construction permit pursuant to the Building and Planning Law. The Ministry of Environmental Protection supervises and monitors broadcast sites to check that they comply with the provisions of these regulations.the Law. The law includes a punitive chapter under which the construction or operation of a source of radiation in contravention of the provisions of the permit and the construction or operation of a source of radiation without a permit, after having been warned in writing by the Commissioner, are strict liability offenses.

 

The regulation of the maximum permissible human exposure levels to radiation from a source of radiation and the safety ranges from communication broadcasting installations, including a limit on the placing of radiation masts on roof terraces, is pending in the Knesset’s Interior Committee for Environmental Quality, as part of a proposed amendment to the regulations under the Non-Ionizing Radiation Law.

In January 2009, the Radiation Supervisor at the Ministry of Environmental Protection published guidelines regarding safety ranges and maximum permitted exposure levels with respect to radio frequency radiation, including from cellular antennas. Discussions are underway regarding these ranges following the World Health Organization's International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) announcement to the effect that radio frequency electromagnetic fields associated with the use of mobile phones may be carcinogenic to humans.

Cellular phones also emit non-ionizing radiation (also known as electromagnetic radiation). Consumer Protection Regulations (Information regarding Non-Ionizing Radiation from a Cellular Telephone) 2002, specify the maximum permitted radiation level for a cellular phone which is measured in units of Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) and requires that Pelephone informs its customers of such measurements. To the best of Pelephone knowledge, all the cellular phones that it markets comply with the relevant SAR standards.

 6154 

 

 

Pelephone's environmental risk management policy.Pelephone conducts periodic radiation tests to ascertain its compliance with permitted operating and international standards. These tests are outsourced and carried out by companies authorized by the Ministry of Environmental Protection. Pelephone applies an internal enforcement procedure for monitoring implementation of the provisions of the Non-Ionizing Radiation Law, under the supervision of a senior manager.

 

Cellular Telephony LicensesTransparency for consumers.Pelephone is required to publicize and inform customers about the radiation sources that it operates and the mobile handsets that it supplies. The Radiation Supervisor of the Ministry of Environmental Protection publishes information on the Ministry's website concerning active cellular broadcast facilities and Pelephone publishes information on its website regarding the SAR levels emitted from cellular phones and Ministry of Health regulations regarding preventive steps to be taken when using cellular phones.

 

Communications Law.The cellular services provided by Pelephone has been granted a general licenseare subject to establish and operate a cellular telephone network in Israel, which is valid until September 8, 2022. In addition, in April 2001, the Civil Administration for the Administered Territories granted Pelephone a general license for the provision of cellular telephony services in the Administered Territories that is valid until September 2022 and the provisions of the general license granted to Pelephone byCommunications Law and its regulations. The law authorizes the Director General of the Ministry of Communications are also applicable to this license. The following areimpose financial sanctions for violations of the principal provisions of the law and of orders and directives issued thereunder, and for violations of the terms of the license.

Wireless Telegraph Ordinance.The Telegraphy Ordinance regulates the use of the electromagnetic spectrum, including Pelephone’s use of radio frequencies as part of its infrastructure. Setting up and operating a system using radio frequencies requires a license and the use of radio frequencies is subject to designation and allocation of a suitable frequency. The Telegraph Ordinance imposes license fees and fees for designation and allocation of frequencies. Due to the current shortage of frequencies for public use in Israel resulting from the designation of numerous frequencies for security uses and other uses, the government limits the number of licenses granted for the use of frequencies.

Pelephone's mobile telephony licenses.Pelephone's mobile telephony license and its general license for providing cellular services in Judea and Samaria are valid through September 2022. The primary provisions of Pelephone's mobile telephony license:license include:

 

Under certain circumstances, the Minister of Communications is entitled tomay modify restrict or suspend the terms of the license, restrict or suspend it, and in certain instances to revoke it.

 

The license is non-transferable and it contains restrictions on the acquisition or transfer (including by meansway of a charge), directly or indirectly, of control or of 10% or more of any Meansmeans of Controlcontrol in Pelephone, including a pledge on said means of control, unless the Minister of Communications has given his consent beforehand. The license includes certain prohibitions on crossholdings in Pelephone and in other telecommunications operators.prior consent.

 

Pelephone is obliged to provide interconnect services under equal terms to all other operators on equal terms and it must refrain from any discrimination in the implementation thereof.carrying out such interconnect service.

 

Pelephone mustis required to refrain from giving a preference in providing itsgranting infrastructure servicesservice priority to aan affiliate licensee with an interestcompany (as defined in the license), such as a related party, over another licensee.

 

Pelephone is generallymay not entitled to sell, lease or mortgage any of the assets used for the implementation of the license without the consent of the Minister of Communications, exceptother than certain exceptions as stipulatedset out in the license.

 

In periodstimes of emergency, whoever is statutorily competent shall have the relevant governmental authority mayto issue certain instructions to Pelephone with respect to itson Pelephone’s mode of operation and/or manner of provision of services.

 

The license sets forthstipulates the types of payments that Pelephone may collect frombill its subscribers for cellular telephony services mechanisms for setting tariffs,and the reports that Pelephone mustit is required to submit to the Ministry of Communications and also the duty of serving notice to the Ministry of Communications prior to modifying its tariffs.Communications. The license also determines the Minister’s power to intervene in setting tariffs, in certain instances.cases.

 

The license commitsobligates Pelephone to provide services at a minimalminimum standard of service, including setting up of service call centers, the determination of a maximum period for repair of malfunctions, an accounts collection procedure and protection of the privacy of the recipient of the service.

 

 To secure Pelephone's undertakings and to compensate and indemnify the State of Israel for any damage that may be caused by Pelephone’s acts, committed by Pelephone, Pelephone is required to furnish NIS 84 million of bank guarantees to the Ministry of Communications. In May 2015, Pelephone deposited guarantees in the amount of NIS 80 million with the Ministry of Communications, which replaced the previous guarantees given in the amount of USD 10 million, as required under the 4G LTE frequency allocation tender.

Pursuant to the Israeli Communications Law and the provisions of Pelephone’s license, the Minister of Communications may revoke the license in certain events, including, among others, in the event of a material breach of the license by Pelephone or breach of certain obligations specified in the license, in the event that certain insolvency or liquidation proceedings are initiated against Pelephone, if officers of Pelephone are convicted of committing certain offenses, or if the public interest requires the revocation of the license.

 

Hearing in regardMinistry of Communications’ decision regarding amendments to the required coverage and qualitylicense.

In July 2014,January 2017, the Ministry of Communications published a hearing directed to holdersissued new guidelines that include dozens of a general license for providing cellular services, including Pelephone. The hearing discusses an amendmentchanges to the operators’ licenses thatcellular operators' license regarding various issues relating to their ongoing handling of customers (including the way billing data is presented, method for joining services, pro rata charges, options for cancelling services, etc.). The applicability dates range from immediate applicability and up to six months from the date of issuance of the guidelines. Pelephone is reviewing these amendments and is preparing to apply them. Implementing the guidelines will tighten the coveragerequire substantial preparation from operational, mechanical and quality requirements for public telecommunications systems using 2G and 3G technology with nationwide deployment and in the Administered Territories. Pelephone submitted its comments and reservations to the hearing. If the coverage and quality requirements are amended as specified in the hearing, Pelephone and the other operators will likely face significant additional costs.

Allocation of Frequenciesaspects.

 

The Telegraph Ordinance regulates the use of the electromagnetic spectrum, and is applicable to Pelephone’s use of radio frequencies as part of its infrastructure. Under the Telegraph Ordinance, the establishment and operation of a system using radio frequencies requires a license and the use of radio frequencies requires designation and allocation of a suitable frequency. The Telegraph Ordinance imposes license fees and fees for designation and allocation of frequencies.

For several years, there has been a shortage of radio frequencies for public use in Israel (due in part to the allocation of many frequencies for security uses), and the Israeli government has limited the number of licenses issued for the use of frequencies, while increasing fees payable in respect of the allocation of frequencies. The shortage of frequencies may also cause difficulties in implementing certain technologies (e.g. advanced technological infrastructures such as LTE).

 6255 

 

 

LTE technology, which is based on an Internet Protocol that can transfer data at higher speeds than the existing Generation 3.5 technology, is used by many operators around the world and is now supported by many smartphones in use in the Israeli market. The Ministry of Communications issued a tender for allocating LTE frequencies in 2014 and Pelephone was awarded 15 MHz on the 1800 frequency band, at an aggregate cost of NIS 96 million. The adoption of the of LTE technology could have a significant effect on the market.

Network Site Permitsconstruction licensing.

The set-up and operation of a wireless communication infrastructure, including cellular communications, are subject to the provisions of the Planning and Construction Law and the Israeli Radiation Law and permits from the Ministry for Protection of the Environment are required.

Local Building Permits

Pelephone’s cellular telephony services areservice is provided through cellular sites spread overdeployed throughout Israel in accordance with engineering requirements. The constant need to upgrade and improve the quality of the cellular telephony services requires setting-upnecessitates setting up cellular sites, configuration changes and changes in configuration and existing antenna systems.deployment of antennas. Pelephone has deployeduses two main types of broadcasting sites: (i)broadcast sites along two tracks: macro sites that require a building permit from planning and building councils;construction committees (see reference to NOP 36) and (ii) wireless access devices which historically diddo not require a building permit. Underpermit under the Communications Law and the Building and Planning Law ("the 334”).

Building permits for erecting a temporary order of the Israeli Supreme Court initially issued in September 2010, Pelephone is currently not subject to certain limitations with respect tocellular broadcasting facility under NOP 36.Licensing for the construction of new wireless access devices absent a permit, as described below.

The licensing of cellular broadcastingbroadcast sites that require building permits is governed by the National Outline Plan for Communications 36, orunder NOP 36. The purpose oflicensing procedure under NOP 36 which came into effect in 2002, is to regulate the deployment and manner of setting-up broadcasting facilities, sorequires, among other things, that the entire country is coveredfollowing permits be obtained: (i) an erection and operating permit from the Ministry of Environmental Protection; (ii) approval of the Civilian Aviation Administration in certain cases; and (iii) IDF approval.

In addition, in order to obtain a permit for transmission and reception, with minimal damageerecting a cellular communications broadcasting facility a deed of indemnity must be submitted to the environment and the landscape. local committee for impairment compensation claims. Pelephone has deposited 234 such indemnity notes with various local councils.

Pelephone and its competitors have encounteredcontinue to encounter difficulties in obtaining some of the required approvals and in particular, approvalspermits, especially permits from planning and buildingconstruction authorities. There is a pending proposalIn view of the criticism with respect to amend NOP 36, which may result in more stringent regulations that could complicate and impede the process of obtaining building permits for cellular sites.

At the same time, criticism has been leveled at NOP 36 by various entities, includinga proposed amendment was published ("Proposed New NOP 36/A"). The terms of the contentionamendment are more stringent and onerous that it is not applicable to 3G frequencies, which has led to a proposal to amend NOP 36.the current version and could result in making the permitting process for cellular sites using this track more difficult. The amended NOP 36 is currently pending government approval.

 

As part of the “pergola reform,” on August 1, 2014, Amendment 101 to the Planning and Building Law, 1965, the Planning and Building (Works and Buildings that are Exempt from a Permit) Regulations, 2014, entered into effect. Regulation 34 provides, among other things, that the addition of an antenna to an existing, lawful broadcasting facility isAccess devices exempt from a permit,building permits.The second track under which Pelephone sets up broadcast sites is the access installation track. The access installations are subject to compliance with a combination of conditions and exclusions, including consistency with the plans and the applicable spatial instructions, to be determined by the local planning committees.

On July 27, 2014 the Forum for Cellular Sanity and others filed a petition to the High Court of Justice for an order instructing the Minister of Interior to explain why Regulation 34 of the Planning and Building Regulations (Works and Buildings that are Exempt from a Permit), 2014 is invalid or alternatively, should be revoked, and to issue an order deferring the effectiveness of Regulation 34 until a ruling is issued otherwise under the petition.

On August 3, 2014 the State filed its response to the petition with the High Court of Justice asking that it be denied. Pelephone's response to the petition was filed on August 10, 2014, wherein Pelephone requested that the Court deny the petition.

On March 9, 2015 a hearing was held on the petition and the petitioners arguments were heard, claiming that the petition in question is related to another petition for which an order was granted and arguments were heard. The petitioners argued that the link between the petitions should not be severed and that the hearing be deferred until after a ruling is made with respect to the other petition. The High Court of Justice also stipulated that if a ruling is not made with respect to the other petition within six months, the petitioners may return and request that a hearing be held.

More than six months after the date of the hearing on the petition and in the absence of a ruling in the other petition, application was filed with the High Court of Justice on January 21, 2016 to fix a hearing date on the petition filed by the Forum for Cellular Sanity. In view of the foregoing, on January 25, 2016 the High Court of Justice determined that the petition will be fixed for a hearing before a panel and on January 28, 2016 a summons was received according to which a hearing was set for July 18, 2016.

Pelephone’s ability to maintain and preserve its cellular service quality as well as its coverage is partially dependent on its ability to set up cellular sites and install infrastructure equipment, including broadcasting sites. Any difficulties encountered by Pelephone in obtaining the required permits and approvals may adversely affect the performance of its existing network and the establishment of additional cellular sites required by the network. The inability to resolve these problems on a timely basis may prevent Pelephone from attaining the service quality goals specified in its license.

63

There are administrative or other delays in some planning and building councils regarding the issuance of building permits for sites. As a result, Pelephone operates a number of broadcasting sites that have not yet received permanent building permits. Pelephone has applied to the planning and building authorities for the building permits and these applications are at various stages of discussion and approval.

The establishment of a broadcasting site without obtaining a building permit constitutes, among other things, a breach of the Planning and Construction Law, and in some instances, this has resulted in demolition orders against sites, indictments or the initiation of civil proceedings against Pelephone and some of its officers. Pelephone has succeeded in most of these instances to avoid demolition or to delay the execution of demolition orders pursuant to arrangements it reached with the planning and building authorities to resolve the lack of licensing. These arrangements have not required any admission of guilt by officers of Pelephone or their conviction. However, it is not certain that this will continue in the future, or that there will be no further instances in which demolition orders are issued and indictments are filed in respect of building permits, including against officers.

Pelephone has also established broadcasting sites using wireless access devices, which require specific radiation permits, according to the Israeli Radiation Law, but historically did not requireare exempt from obtaining a buildingconstruction permit ifprovided that they were constructed pursuant toare erected under the conditions providedthat are set out in anthe exemption provision pursuant to the Israeli Communications Law and the planning and construction law.provision. Some local authorities have disputed the applicability of the exemption provision to wirelesson cellular network access devicesinstallations and to their use. Pelephone’sPelephone's position regardingon the applicability of the exemption was accepted in a number of rulings and decisions by local affairs courts and the use of such facilities and the supporting equipment werewas approved. One verdict provided an opposite ruling. Appeals have been filed foragainst some of these rulings and decisions. Under a temporary order issued bydecisions, some of which are still pending before the High Court of Justice on September 15, 2010, as amended on February 16, 2011 and July 17, 2012, and as extended on September 30, 2013, Pelephone, Cellcom and Partner are permitted under the exemption provision to exchange wireless access devices with another wireless access device for maintenance purposes, provided that the new deviceSupreme Court.

A petition is pending in the exact same location asSupreme Court regarding this exemption and other matters connected to the replaced devicegrant of permits for access installations tracks. Due to this petition, a draft Planning and subject to other conditionsConstruction (Installation of a Cellular Wireless Communication access installation) Regulations, 2010, or the Access Installation Regulations, was published in the temporary order, but are prohibited from erecting new wireless access devices under the exemption provision. HOT Mobile and Golan are temporarily permitted to deploy wireless access devices, under more lenient conditions.

On September 15, 2014 a hearing was held on petitions filed with the High Court of Justice and the arguments of all the parties were heard. In this context, the High Court of Justice recommended that the parties attempt to reach an arrangement that will balance the conflicting interests and move the process of promulgating the regulations forward in the spirit of the draft regulations from March 2010. The High Court of Justice further instructed the State to file an updated notice within 120 days which willproposed Access Installation Regulations include among other things, the Minister of the Interior’s current position, the current position of the Minister of Communications with respect to both the draft regulations and the existing regulations, the current position of the Antitrust Commissioner and an update of the Knesset Economic Affairs Committee discussions. The parties were also granted permission to respond to the State's position within 30 days of receipt. The High Court of Justice also instructed the parties to advise, no later than January 20, 2015 as to whether they had reached agreement and determined that after receiving notice from all the parties, the High Court of Justice will decide on how the cases will continue. In the State's update notice to the High Court of Justice dated January 19, 2015 the State explained, among other things, that the Minister of the Interior at that time, Gideon Saar, announced his decision to resign and consequently the terms of office of the relevant ministers changed. The State further stated that on December 8, 2014, the Knesset passed a bill to dissolve itself, ending the session and the Knesset went to pre-election recess. Under these circumstances, the State requested an extension to file its update notice until July 15, 2015, and on January 21, 2015 the High Court of Justice granted the requested extension.

Under this notice the State announced, among other things, that on May 14, 2015 a new government was formed in Israel, and it was decided to transfer most of the authority of the Minister of the Interior under the Building and Planning Law to the Minister of Finance. The State further announced that on July 13, 2015 the Knesset approved the transfer of authorities from the Minister of Interior to the Minister of Finance. The State added that the Minister of Finance should be given reasonable time to address the issue of regulating regulations under the Building and Planning Law and to formulate his opinion regarding the matter. Under the circumstances that were created and to enable the Minister of Finance as well as the Ministers of Communications and Environmental Protection to address the issues in the petition and to formulate their opinions, the State requested a further extensionrestrictive conditions for filing its updated notice by December 15, 2015. On July 19, 2015 the High Court of Justice awarded the requested extension.

On December 24, 2015, an updated notice was filed with the High Court of Justice by the State according to which the State announced that it is reviewing the options recommended by the Minister of Finance, to whom the authority to regulate regulations of the Building and Planning Law was transferred. The State further announced that the Deputy Attorney General would hold a hearing on the matter in the near future. Under these circumstances the State requested additional time to review the options for regulating "balanced" regulations and to file another notice on a date that will be fixed by the High Court of Justice.

On November 19, 2015, Partner Communications Ltd. and HOT Mobile Ltd. filed a petition to the High Court of Justice requesting that the temporary injunction of September 16, 2010 be limited. In the State's response, which was attached to the petition, the State made its consent to limiting the temporary injunction subject the companies dismantling and removing no less than 300 wireless access installations within one year. On January 5, 2016, Cellcom Israel Ltd. filed a petition on its behalf asking that the limit contained in the temporary injunction would also apply to it, but without application of the condition to dismantlebuilding permit exemption for a wireless access installations, based on the arguments set out in its petition. On January 12, 2016, Pelephone Communications Ltd. also filed a similar petition regarding limiting the applicability of the order, and Pelephone also requested that the obligation to dismantle access installations should also not apply to it.installation.

64

 

In view of the foregoing, on January 27, 2016delays in the legislation process, the High Court of Justice issued a decision requiring the State to file its response to the petitions of Cellcom and Pelephone to limit the temporary injunction with reference to their request not to dismantle partforbidding the erection of additional wireless access installations for holders of mobile telephony licenses under the exemption from obtaining a permit: however, cellular providers may, under certain conditions, replace access installations that they hold, by February 3, 2016.are no longer in use or that are out of order.

 

Pelephone believes that if the Access Installation Regulations are approved as proposed, the option of using the building permit exemption track in order to erect cellular access installations will be severely restricted. A restriction of this track, together with the proposed tightening of the terms for construction of base sites in the parallel Proposed New NOP 36A track is likely to lead to noticeable increase in theincreased obstacles restrictingto the construction of new broadcastingbroadcast sites and access installations and wouldmay have an adverse effect on the quality of the cellular network. At present,

Pelephone currently operates 461400 wireless access installations.

Pelephone’s ability to maintain and preserve the quality of its cellular services as well as its coverage is based partly on its ability to construct cellular sites and install information equipment, including broadcasting sites. The difficulties encountered by Pelephone in obtaining the permits and approvals required may have an adverse effect on the existing infrastructure, network performance and on the construction of the additional cellular sites required by the network. Any inability to resolve these issues in a timely manner will likely prevent Pelephone from achieving the service quality targets established in the cellular license.

A few sites constructed years ago still lack approvals from the Civil Aviation Administration and the IDF, even though applications for such approvals were submitted yearsa long time ago. In addition, there are administrative or other delays in some of the building and planning committees for issuing building permits for sites. Consequently, Pelephone operates several broadcastingbroadcast sites prior to obtainingthat have not yet been granted the requisite building permits. Building permit applications submitted by Pelephone to the building and planning authorities are at various review or approval stages.

 

Construction of a broadcastingbroadcast site without a building permit constitutes a breach of the law and in some cases it has led to the issuance of demolition orders, of sites or the filing of indictments or instigationand the initiation of civil proceedings against Pelephone and some of its officers.

Pelephone has succeeded in mostavoiding the demolition of the above casessites or in delaying implementation of the demolition orders as part of arrangements made with the planning and building authorities in order to attempt to regulate the missing licensing.licenses. These understandings did not require admission of guilt and/or the conviction of Pelephone's officers. Notwithstanding, there is no certaintyNo assurance can be given that this situation will not continue in the future, or that there will be no further cases where demolition orders arewill not be issued andor indictments are filed including against officers, because of the failure to obtain building permits.

 

56

Like other cellular operators in Israel, Pelephone mightmay be required to dismantle broadcastingbroadcast sites before the requisite approvals and permits have been obtained, on the dates stipulated in the law.obtained. Pelephone uses access installations to provide coverage and capacity for highly populated areas. If legal grounds are established to requirerequiring the simultaneous demolition of a number of sites in a given geographic area, service in that area may deteriorate until alternative broadcastingbroadcast sites can be established.

 

PermitsStandardization.Pelephone conducts routine durability and quality control tests of its facilities. The quality control and supervision do not detract from Pelephone’s responsibility towards its customers for the quality of the Ministryservices it provides. Pelephone complies with the 2015 version of Environmental ProtectionIsraeli ISO 9001 requirements for mobile radio telephony (cellular) services and undergoes periodic inspections by the Institute of Quality & Control (IQC) to verify compliance with the standard. The current IQC approval is valid until December 2019. Once a year, an inspection is conducted to ensure that Pelephone's operations comply with the requirements of the standard. The last inspection was carried out in December 2016, and was successful.

 

The Minister for Environmental Protection has promulgated regulations pursuant to the Israeli Radiation Law that address issues such as fees for permits, the method of measuring radiation, etc.

In January 2009, the Radiation Supervisor at the Ministry for Environmental Protection published guidelines regarding safety ranges and maximum permitted exposure levels with respect to radio frequency radiation, including from cellular aerials.

In 2010, the Ministry of Environmental Protection notified Pelephone ofMaterial Agreements.On July 14, 2016 a new condition for all of its network site operation permits, according to which it must install in its systems software (providedonline tender was held by the Ministry of Environmental Protection) that monitorsFinance Accountant General for the provision of mobile telephony services to State employees. Pelephone, which has provided various mobile telephony services to the State and reportsits employees for several years after winning previous RFPs also participated in this RFP and was awarded the leveltender. As a result, Pelephone will continue to be the primary provider of power created in real time from the operation of its network sites.

Additional Environmental Regulationmobile telephony services for State employees.

 

Israeli Consumer Protection Regulations (Information regarding Non-Ionizing Radiation from a Cellular Telephone), 2002 specifyOn July 31, 2016 Pelephone and the maximum permitted radiation levelState entered into an agreement under which Pelephone will provide mobile telephony services for a cellular telephone measured in units of Specific Absorption Rate (“SAR”) and require Pelephone to notify its customers regarding the maximum permitted radiation level. As far as we are aware, all of the cellular telephones that Pelephone markets complyan estimated 100,000 State employees for three years, with the relevant SAR standards.

65

Pelephone conducts periodic radiation testsState having an option to extend the agreement for up to 45 months in orderaddition to ascertain its compliance with permitted operation standards and the standards of the International Radiation Protection Agency. These tests are outsourced and performed by companies authorized by the Ministry for Protection of the Environment. Pelephone has an internal enforcement procedure for supervision of implementation of the provisions of the Israeli Radiation Law, which is supervised by a senior manager. The purpose of the procedure is to incorporate the provisions of the Israeli Radiation Law into the procedures of Pelephone and limit the possibility of violations.

36 basic months. Pelephone is subject to laws that define obligations to publicize and inform customers aboutat present in the sourcesadvanced stages of implementing the radiation that it operates and the mobile handsets that it supplies. The Radiation Supervisor at the Ministry for Protection of the Environment publishes information on the Ministry’s website about active cellular broadcasting facilities and those that are under construction. The Ministry for Protection of the Environment continuously monitors the cellular broadcasting facilities that Pelephone erects and operates, as it does to the other operators. On its website, Pelephone publishes information about radiation emitted from cellular phones and Ministry of Health regulations regarding preventive caution when using cellular phones.

Cellular Infrastructure Sharing

In May 2013, the Ministry of Communications, Ministry of Health and the Ministry of the Environment announced that a pre-condition to the deployment of fourth generation cellular infrastructure is the implementation of the inter-ministerial task force’s recommendations regarding the sharing of cellular infrastructures.

Separation between the Sale of Terminal Equipment and the Sale of Cellular Telephony Services

In January 2013, an amendment to the Israeli Communications Law became effective, under which a cellular telephony operator may not make a subscriber’s commitment to receive cellular telephony services dependent on that subscriber’s agreement to purchase, rent, borrow or lease terminal equipment. In the past, Pelephone’s principal sales method was to offer discounts on the price of cellular telephony services subject to the purchase of terminal equipment. This amendment has had a negative effect on the sale of terminal equipment.

Ministry of Communications Hearing Concerning WiFi

On August 6, 2014, the Ministry of Communications published a hearing report on the issue of amending Bezeq International's ISP license (corresponding with the bill discussed by the Economic Affairs Committee). The main points of the amendment are expansion of the existing obligation under the provisions of the Communications Law to inform customersgovernment ministries and offer them an opportunity to protect themselves against offensive content by means of basic filtering software that is provided free of charge. As part of the hearing, the Ministry sought, among other things, to require Bezeq International to offer its customers more advanced filtering software free of charge, allowing them to choose between an applicative filter (which must be compatible for all devices) and the use of a network filter. Some of these solutions cannot be applied at the present time.organizations affiliated with it.

 

Bezeq International

 

On February 21, 2016 Bezeq International's license was amended by the Director General Director of the Ministry of Communications and was replaced by a unified general license to providefor providing telecommunications services, or the Unified License.

The Unified License cancels and replaces the general license for providing international telecommunications services that was granted to Bezeq International on June 2, 1996, and the special general license for providing fixed-line domestic telecommunications services granted to B I P Telecom. Ltd. on February 8, 2009. In addition, the Unified License also cancels and replaces the special licenses for providing NEP and Internet services previously granted to Bezeq International. The Unified License, which is valid until May 2, 2025, covers all the services that Bezeq International iswas permitted to provide to date. Pursuant to Ministry of Communications requirements, Bezeq International provided a bank guarantee of NIS 5 million in compliance with the terms of the Unified License.

 

On July 9, 2014, the Minister of Communications granted Bezeq International the powers pertaining to land that are listed in Chapter 6 of the Communications Law, including access to land for the purpose of laying and maintaining a network.

Amendment to the Communications Law with respect to filtering of offensive content

In August 2012,Since 2013 the Ministry of Communications amended the licenses of the ISPs, adding provisions to the licenses concerning filtering of offensive sites and content, as a supplementary measure to the existing provisions of the lawhas conducted hearings with regard to the re-regulation of the international telecommunications market. Originally, the proposed regulation enabled any fixed-line domestic operator or mobile telephony operator to provide international telecommunications services as part of the service bundles they offer to their subscribers, with conditions, as well as international data transmission and configuration services. Resolutions adopted subsequent to this issue. The amendment stipulates thathearing could have a license holder will be required among other things, to inform its subscribers about offensive websites and content which are not suitable for children and teenagers and to include details of methods for blocking access to such sites and content. Likewise, the license holder must offer its subscribers an effective service for filtering offensive sites and content, for no additional payment.

66

On August 6, 2014 the Ministry of Communications published a hearingsignificant impact on the issuestructure of amendingcompetition in the international telecommunications sector, and consequently also on the results of Bezeq International's ITS license (corresponding withoperations. Bezeq International is unable to estimate the bill discussed by the Economic Affairs Committee). The main pointsscope of the amendmentnew regulations that are expansion ofexpected to be adopted subsequent to the existing obligation to inform customers and offer them an opportunity to protect themselves against offensive Internet content and requiring Bezeq International to provide its customers, free of charge, with the most advanced filtering software; solutions that in part are not applicable at this time.hearing.

 

DBS

 

The television broadcasting industry in Israel is highly regulated. Broadcasting is carried out pursuant to various broadcast licenses and is subject to the ongoing supervision of the Ministry of Communications and the Broadcasting Council. DBS’s operations are regulated by and subject to an extensive system of laws that apply to the area of broadcasting, including the Israeli Communications Law and regulations thereunder and the Communications Rules, as well as administrative directives and Broadcasting Council decisions. Pursuant to the Communications Rules, various obligations and restrictions apply to DBS, including those relating to broadcast content and the amount and manner of investment in local productions. In addition, DBS may own up to 30% of the local channels broadcast by it.

Operations in the broadcastingmulti-channel television broadcast sector are subject to extensive communications regulation, underparticularly the Communications Law, with a strict licensing and monitoring regime and Ministry of Communications’Communications policy decisions. BroadcastingBroadcast operations are also under the ongoing supervision of the Council for Cable TV and Satellite Broadcasting, or the TV Council, which sets policy, makes rules and monitors many areas of the sector, including broadcastingbroadcast content, compliance regarding original Israeli content, broadcastingproductions, broadcast ethics, consumer protection and approval of the channels broadcast and price controls. Non-licensed broadcasters providingProviding multi-channel television services are currentlyby non-licensed broadcasters is not subject to the foregoing supervision.

 

Filber Committee recommendations.In September 2014,June 2016, the Prime Minister and Minister of Communications appointedFilber Committee, an advisory committee orestablished to advise on the Filber Committee, to formulateregulation of the broadcast and content sector, submitted its conclusions and recommendations regarding regulation of the broadcasting andbroadcast market, including with respect to providers of content sector, including applicabilitythat is not broadcast via satellite or cable. In March 2017, the Minister of Communications decided to new players and formulating legislative amendments. On February 3, 2016,adopt most of the Filber Committee recommendations and ordered their adoption through legislation and guidelines to be submitted its interim recommendationsby the end of April 2017.

The Filber Committee recommended that the audio-visual content providers be defined as: (i) Small provider - has a market share exceeding 10% of the total market revenues; (ii) Stable Small Provider - has a market share exceeding 10% of the total market revenues for 3 consecutive years; (iii) Substantial Provider - has a market share exceeding 20% of the market revenues. Under this definition scheme DBS would be considered a substantial provider.

57

Narrow regulation will apply to small providers under the license granted to them and they will be able to select either commercials or subscription fees as their source of financing. Narrow and broad regulation will apply to stable small providers and substantial providers, which will include among other things, applicability of broad regulatory duties (including the dutyobligations to invest in and present original productions) and soft regulation (that includes the duty to mark and classify content and restrictions on marketing content) for major providers, which are defined as audio-visual service providers whose market share exceeds 20% of the television provider market revenues (and so long as the market share is no less than 15%), and applicability of soft regulation only for non-major audio visual providers.productions.

 

The Filber Committee also intendsrecommended a gradual reduction whereby the obligation of the substantial providers (HOT and DBS) to review the relief of regulation applicable to the broadcasting segment with regard to basic bundles and narrow bundles, regulating the launch and removal of channels, broadcasting dates and times and broadcastsinvest in various languages, as well as the TV Council's rules relating to original productions relief regarding the lengthwill gradually decrease from an amount equal to 8% revenues to 6.5% of series, production adequacyrevenues by 2021 and premier broadcasting duties.investment in high-end productions will increase from 4% of revenues to 5% of revenues.

 

The recommendation of the Eyal Committee, the previous committee established to advise regarding the distribution of rights in purchased original productions or independent productions, was adopted in accordance with the criteria set out in the report. In addition, at the end of three years following the initial broadcast of a production, must sell rules will apply to the independent channels that receive original production funds, for further broadcast of the original productions that they produced for the substantial providers. The price will be set by the independent channels, and the reasonableness of the price will be reviewed by the Minister and the Council over time.

The Filber Committee further recommended applying to the Antitrust Authority to grant general permission for collaboration between the owners of the independent channels for marketing and billing to enable them to provide joint content bundles to subscribers.

The Filber Committee also recommended the grant of a commercial license to anyone that broadcasts a gradual four year plan be drafted regarding investmentschannel that is funded by advertising (including a license holder for cable broadcasts via dedicated channels) and under certain conditions, to grant industry protections to a "new commercial license holder" and to an "established commercial license holder", and to subject them to narrow regulation with no obligation to invest in high-endoriginal productions. It also recommended the imposition of broad regulation on "regular commercial license holders” that include an obligation to invest in original productions according to which, among other things, such investment duty will applybroadcast news (including minimum investments) and to DBSsubject the license holders to regulation regarding cross ownerships and HOT in annews broadcasting. The Committee also recommended that the amount that will not fall below 4% of its revenuescommercial license holders are required to invest in local high-end productions (starting from 2019) in purchased local productions be reduced and to gradually reduce the obligation to invest minimum amounts in news broadcasts.

In addition to adopting the foregoing recommendations, several remaining issues included in the first yearFilber Committee report, as decided by the Minister, are being reviewed by a special team that is to submit its recommendations to the Minister in April 2017, including:

Regulation of must sell requirements and competition in the content sector - the Committee sought to avoid situations whereby certain content, primarily sports programs, will be inaccessible to subscribers of certain license holders, that could constitute a competition barrier against these license holders. The Committee recommended imposing a must sell obligation on sports channels towards licensed content providers, and a must sell obligation on sports operators towards sports channels. The programs will be offered for sale by the channel purchasing the broadcast rights according to the average cost plus per subscriber model. The entire channels will be offered for sale at an average price per subscriber to be fixed by the channel’s owner and will be collected equally, based on the total number of subscribers of all the providers. An obligation to obtain "approval for broadcasting in Israel" will be imposed on independent channels that receive funding for original productions and on sports channels, which will include a must sell obligation for sports broadcasts as described below, as well as a "special license" appendix granting them the right to switch between broadcasting platforms against payment of a channel transfer fee.

The Committee also stipulated that the obligation to share sports content will be regulated at two levels: The first is an obligation that will apply to the owners of rights in significant sports operators that are broadcast to the Israeli public, to grant licenses to broadcast the significant sports operator to the producer of a sports channel that requests such a license, in return for a price that is based on an average cost per subscriber. The second is an obligation that will apply to the producer of a sports channel that broadcasts sports content to the Israeli public from one or more of the foregoing significant sports operators (or from another sports operator as determined by the Council) to grant to any content provider that so requests, a license to broadcast the sports channel at a uniform price per viewer.

Cancellation of the basic package and the initial basic package - it was suggested that the basic packages that HOT and DBS are required to offer be cancelled and in parallel to upgrade the existing basic package, to be called the "core package", so that it includes in addition to the mandatory channels that the license holders are obligated to provide by law, a sports channel and children's channel that will be produced in Israel. In addition, 75% of the original productions will be available to all core package subscribers on VOD, which will be provided equally to all core package subscribers. The price of the core package will be set by the substantial providers so that its current price will serve as an upper price limit and its reasonableness will be reviewed by the Minister and the experts. If the price is found to be unreasonable, the Minister will set a binding maximum price.

58

As the implementation of the Filber Committee recommendations, including those adopted by the Minister, require legislative amendments and not less than 3%appropriate regulatory decisions, DBS is unable to assess whether these recommendations will in fact be implemented whole or in part, or in what format. DBS is also unable to assess the effect of revenues in the fourth year.such legislative amendments, if adopted, on its business.

 

The broadcasting licenseDBS’s key licenses.DBS owns the following key licenses:

a broadcast license valid through January 2023 – this license is material to DBS’s operations and is the main regulatory permit for its operations;

a satellite television license that permits broadcasts in the Administered Territories and is valid through December 2022; and

a license to perform uplink operations (transfer of broadcasts from DBS’s broadcast centers to the broadcast satellite and implementation of set and ancillary operation activities) which is valid until January 2023 or until the end of DBS’s broadcast license, whichever is the earlier - this license is essential to DBS’s operations and is the regulatory permit for the transmission of broadcast messages from the broadcast center to the broadcast satellites and from them to the subscribers' homes.

Tariff control

The broadcastingbroadcast license providescontains provisions regarding the types of fees the licensee may collect from its subscribers for services provided under the license and those fixed in DBS’s price list. The vast majority of subscribers join special campaigns offering DBS services, including various content combination packages, related services, as well as the receipt and installation of terminal equipment at prices below the listed price.

The vast majority of subscribers join special offers, including different combinations of content packages, related services, as well as receiving and installation of terminal equipment at prices below the listed price for all components of the special offer and they appear in the DBS price list. The Council chairperson may intervene in campaigns or reductions offered by DBS if it is foundhe/she finds that they are misleading to the public or discriminate amongbetween subscribers.

 

Under Section 6(49) of the Communications Law, the license may stipulate maximum prices that can be charged to subscribers. At present,To date no such prices havehad been set. Furthermore, under the Communications Law,In addition, the Minister may setfix the price forof the basic package.packages.

67

 

In December 2015,July 2016, the TV Council issued a hearing document regarding setting a priceCouncil's resolution on the policy of special offers and applicability of transparency provisions addressing the multi-channel television market, including DBS. Prior to issuing the Hearing Document, the Council chairperson decided not to allow DBS to raise the price for its VOD services. At the same time, the Council chairperson also decided not to approve the various price hikes announced by HOT. The Hearing Document stated, among other things, that basedcame into effect as follows:

Each primary deal (that includes the broad basic package, the narrow basic package or any other basic package that will be offered in the future) will be priced for a defined and fixed period of 4 to 18 months only ("the Initial Price Period") during which no price increase will be allowed.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, it will be possible to grant an additional discount during the first four months of the Initial Price Period.

It will not be possible to cancel a special offer during the Initial Price Period, unless permitted by law.

It will be possible to agree in advance with a subscriber on the economic test conducted by the TV Council, the Council assumes that the current price structure in the multi-channel television market significantly harms competition and allegedly also raises concerns of discrimination and misrepresentation. Therefore, the Council initiated a hearing regarding its intention to prescribe comprehensive policies regarding prices in the multi-channel television market that will be based on various recommendations brought before the TV Council, including the recommendation to deny the option of raising the price that will apply after the Initial Price Period ("Continuation Prices"), subject to certain conditions concerning the Continuation Prices and the method for notifying the subscriber regarding their coming into effect and regarding the subscriber's rights to give notice of termination of the agreement during the period of the Continuation Prices.

All primary deals must be published on the website (excluding special retention offers). It is not mandatory to publish bonuses and compensation offers.

Customer service centers must offer subscribers the best deals that are relevant to them.

The provisions of the current campaign within the perioddecision will not apply at this stage to business customers and with respect to groups that provide economies of the campaign; to provide that new campaigns will apply for subscribers for a limited period of 4 months only; to prohibit offering preferential prices to subscribers who threaten deserting or who are in the stages of disconnecting; to establish a prohibition on discrimination between campaigns and tracks offered at any given time; and to explore the option of canceling price gaps between existing customers unrelated to the date on which they joined and the track that they chose, as well as to define a standard uniform price for these subscribers.scale, including kibbutzim, workers' committees, etc.

 

The Hearing Document also stated that a recommendation was brought before the TV Council that if the reformdoes not intend to prevent differentiation between special deals targeting new customers and setting of a price policy is not achieved within a reasonable period of time, the required objectives (as set out in the Hearing Document - significant improvement in transparency and simplifying the customers' ability to compare prices and the scope of the competitiveness), a more thorough investigation will examine applying price controls on the multi-channel television companies. The Hearing Document further stated that in view of the economic study presented before the Council, and with special attention to the significance of the principle of transparency, the Council decided that it should order the disclosure of all the price lists and campaigns of the companies in the multi-channel television market, by amending the licenses of the companies so that they will be required to publish on their websites all the campaigns offered to all of the customers of the companies. The TV Council also decided to temporarily freeze price hikes in the multi-channel television market and not allow companies to offer new campaigns (this decision regarding a temporary freeze was canceled in February 2016, also due to HOT and DBS undertaking to publish new campaigns). In February 2016, DBS filed its response to the Hearing Document. The implementation of the proposal of the Council could have a substantial adverse effect on DBS's revenues and profitability.those targeting existing customers.

 

Obligation to invest in local productionsproductions.

Under the provisions of the broadcastingbroadcast license and the TV Council's decisions, in 20152016 and 2017 DBS wasis required to invest an amount no less than 8% of its revenuerevenues from subscription fees in local productions, and according to the communications regulations and the decisions of the TV Council, DBS is required to invest different amounts of these investmentsfunds in various genres of local productions. During 2016, DBS completed the investment required to satisfy previous shortfalls.

59

In 2015, DBS also supplemented investment shortfalls set byDecember 2016, the Council for certain genres. The obligationdecided to investpostpone its previous decision that DBS investment in local productions in 2016 remains at 8%, of revenues. In November 2015, the TV Council decided that the rate of investment in local production applicable for 2017 onwards will increasebe increased to 9% of its revenues from subscription fees until 2018, so long as the TV Council does not order otherwise and so long as there is no decline in DBS's revenues or the number of its subscribers, at a rate and in a manner that is to beare prescribed in the decision. The Council further decided that in the third quarter of 2017 it will review the prevailing legislative status and the financial situation of the license holders in accordance with a formula fixed in the decision for the rate of investment and will issue provisions if it deems fit.

 

Requirement to transmit channelschannels.

In accordance with the requirements under the law and license, DBS is required to allow the producers of channels set out in the law to use its infrastructures to transmit broadcasts to its subscribers in exchange for a payment to be determined in the agreement. Lacking agreement, theand if no agreement is reached, in exchange for a payment willto be determined by the Minister, after consulting with the TV Council.

Pursuant to the amendment to the Communications Law in 2010, niche channels are exempt from fees other than to HOT and DBS.

 

Content of the broadcasts and obligations with respect to subscriptionsubscription.

The broadcasting license sets out provisions that relate to the content of DBS’s broadcasts, including an obligation to obtain the Council’s approval of the channels broadcast by DBS. The Communications Law forbids holders of broadcastbroadcasting licenses to broadcast commercials, other than a few exceptions. The broadcastbroadcasting license also includes provisions regarding the subscriber service terms, including discrimination prohibition.

 

Ownership of broadcast channelschannels.

Pursuant with the Communications Rules, DBS, including its affiliates as defined in the Communications Rules, may own up to 30% of the domestic channels it broadcasts (compared with the 20% applicable to HOT.) DBS is restricted under the Communications Law with respect to ownership of news broadcast productions, however under the Communications Law (Telecommunications and Broadcasts) (Amendment No. 59 and Temporary Order), 2014 and the Council's decision of March 2014, DBS has broadcast domestic news since April 2014. The Temporary Order was issued for two years as of April 2014.from owning a new program producer.

68

 

General provisions regarding the broadcasting licensebroadcast license.

The Minister and the Council have parallel authority to amend theDBS’s broadcast license. The Minister was authorized to cancel or postpone the broadcast license for causes set out in the Communications Law and the broadcast license. The Communications Law and broadcast license stipulate restrictions on the transfer, attachment and encumbrance of the broadcast license and any of the assets of the broadcast license. The broadcast license requires receipt of the approval of the Minister for specific changes in the holding of the means of control in DBS and imposes a reporting requirement regarding the holders of the means of control; harminghurting competition by way of an agreement, arrangement or understanding with a third party in terms of provision of broadcasts and services is prohibited, unless approved in advance and in writing by the Council; theCouncil. The obligation to file reports to the Ministry of Communications was defined as well as conditions regarding the regulation of the activity of the licenses;licenses. In addition, an obligation was stipulated to provide bank guarantees that are currently NIS 40 million (principal) to the Ministry of Communications to guarantee DBS 'sDBS's undertakings under the license (in order to issue these guarantees, DBS shareholders provided securities to the issuing banks).

Wiring in subscribers' homes

In October 2012, the Ministry of Communications announced that it would cancel the administrative order applicable at that time, regulating subscriber churn between DBS and HOT, and reciprocal use of the infrastructure in subscribers’ homes which in some cases is owned by the other provider. This announcement was further to the request by DBS and HOT to amend the administrative order, primarily to cancel the advance notice obligation for a subscriber connecting to another service provider. In 2013, DBS and HOT applied to the Ministry of Communications to amend this decision, so that the administrative instruction is not canceled but will be amended as they requested. The Ministry of Communications’ position on this issue has not yet been received.

 

Offering service bundlesbundles.

Under the broadcast license, DBS may offer joint service bundles that include service provided by Bezeq and service by DBS, subject to obtaining Ministry of Communications approval (and if no objections are raised within the period specified in the license, such approval will be deemed granted) and subject to conditions, the most important of which are the "unbundling" obligation, and the existence of a corresponding bundle marketed by a licensee that is unrelated to Bezeq.the Company. A joint service bundle that includes Bezeq'sBezeq’s Internet infrastructure service only, does not require Ministry of Communications approval and the unbundling obligation does not apply.

 

DBS believes that in view of the development of competition between the communications groups and the growing importance of the supply of comprehensive communications services, if the restrictions with regard to Bezeq's collaboration with DBS remain in place, the adverse impact of such restrictions on DBS's results may increase.

On March 10, 2016,increase if the TV Council laid out certain decisions, including, among others, that each main special deal (a deal including the broad basic package, the narrow basic package or any other basic package that will be offeredrestrictions on Bezeq's collaboration with DBS remain in the future) will be priced for a defined and fixed period of 4 to 18 months only, during which no price increase will be permitted.place.

 

Regulation of the transmission of video content via media infrastructuresinfrastructures.

In July 2015, the committee that was appointed to examine regulation of the commercial broadcasts in 2014 submitted its final report. This report contains, among other things, the following recommendations: the establishment of a unified regulatory authority in the communications industry that will prescribe a list of issues that will be arranged through mutual regulation and a code of ethics, the duty to label and classify services, mandatory reporting dates for those entities that are required to report and measurable parameters for checking the level of competition in the communications sector.

The committee’scommittees' decisions, if applied, may affect the developing trend of video content transmitted over the web.web DBS believes that the VOD services it provides over the web, are not subject to the regulations currently applicable to the multi-channel television broadcasts and as far as it is aware,aware. DBS also believes that the other services it provides via the Internet (such as yesGo) are also not subject to such regulation. Nonetheless, from the Council's various decisions it appears that the Council believes it is authorized to also regulate these services regarding DBS. In the event thatservices. If these regulations are formulated or applied, they may affect the services provided by DBS.

DTT

The Second Authority for Television and Radio, or the Second Authority, operates a digital terrestrial television and radio broadcasting system, or DTT, commercially known as Idan Plus, through which certain channels are broadcasted to the public, free of charge. It currently broadcasts the channels of the Broadcasting Authority (Channel 1 and Channel 33), the commercial channels (Channel 2 and Channel 10) and the Knesset Channel (Channel 99). The DTT operator may broadcast additional channels including radio channels, educational channels and special topic channels. These channels will generally carry broadcasting fees, but the Ministers of Communications and Finance may elect to subsidize the broadcasting fees for subject-based channels and niche channels. The subject-based channels may, under the law, finance their broadcasts by charging a subscription fee in addition to the alternative financing through commercials. The Ministers of Communications and Finance may appoint a private entity to operate the DTT system, in place of the Second Authority. At present, the DTT provides a limited alternative product to the multi-channel television broadcasts. DBS believes that an increase in the number or range of channels broadcast via DTT, as well as the possibility of a private entity operating the DTT system, could increase the scope of programs broadcasted and may therefore have a material detrimental effect on DBS's results.

69

Narrow Package Offering

In accordance with a decision of the TV Council, beginning December 2012, DBS and HOT must allow subscribers to purchase, in addition to the basic package of channels that the licensees are obligated to offer to all their subscribers by law, a package of channels that includes certain basic channels and at least four channels produced in Israel, including a sports channel and a channel for pre-school children or a channel for children and teens based on the conditions defined in the Broadcasting Council’s decision. According to the decision, DBS and HOT were required to offer these channels until May 31, 2013. In May 2013, the TV Council announced an extension of the period during which DBS and HOT may offer the limited group of channels until August 31, 2013.

In July 2013, the Knesset passed a second and third reading of provisions concerning the offering of a basic package in cable and satellite broadcasts as part of the Law for the Change of National Priorities (Legislative Amendments for Achieving Budget Targets for 2013-2014), 2013. According to such law, the Minister of Communications will stipulate the number of channels and price of the package and he will be authorized to stipulate the policy concerning the specifications of and types of channels in the package. The TV Council will issue instructions for implementation of the Minister of Communications’ stipulations, including with respect to the specification, content, standard and scope of the channels. The Minister of Communications’ stipulations will remain in force for a period of no more than three years, but the Minister of Communications’ may, after consulting with the Broadcasting Council, instruct an extension for additional periods. Payment may not be collected from subscribers for the basic package for related services (including installation fees or the cost of installation and for terminal equipment) if subscribers are not charged for other packages, and in any event such payment will not exceed the payment requested from subscribers of other packages without permission from the TV Council.

In August 2013, the TV Council announced that it is considering amending the Communications (Broadcasting Licensee) Rules, 1987 and adopting a different model from the present model. According to the new model, DBS and HOT will be obligated to offer their subscribers a basic package of broadcasts which will include the mandatory channels as well as a number of additional channels which the subscriber will be able to choose from the broadcast channels offered by the license holder (except for a small number of channels), so that the basic package will include, together with the mandatory channels, between 17 and 24 channels.

Transmission of Video Content via Media Infrastructures

In February 2014, the Minister of Communications appointed a committee to review the regulation of commercial broadcasts that will apply to all companies engaged in broadcasting of audio visual content. The committee was also required to make recommendations regarding the possible inclusion of commercials in HOT and DBS broadcasts. The committee was required to formulate its recommendations by August 2014. Further to a request from the committee, DBS submitted its position on the foregoing issues to the committee in April 2014.

In August 2014, the Committee submitted its recommendations to the Minister of Communications in an interim report. The committee recommended, among other things, that a license need not be required to provide audio-visual services over the Internet; that the regulations applicable to the new providers be imposed on a gradual basis, based on qualifying tests to be defined and the number of subscribers; and that a national communications authority be established to serve as a central regulator, which will incorporate the Ministry of Communications, the Second Authority and the Council. In September 2014, DBS submitted its response, in which it argued that licensing requirements should also apply to new suppliers, that the regulations should apply equally to holders of broadcast licenses and to new providers, and that if the regulations are applied gradually, the date on which the regulations become applicable should be limited (not only by quantitative measures). As of the date of this report, the committee is has not submitted its final report. The committee's decisions, if applied, may affect the developing trend of video content transmitted over the web.

DBS believes that the VOD services it provides over the web are not subject to the regulations currently applicable to the multi-channel television broadcasts and as far as it is aware, this is the position of the Ministry of Communications. DBS also believes that the other services it provides via the Internet (such as yesGo) are also not subject to such regulation. Nonetheless, if other regulations will be formulated or applied, they may affect the foregoing services provided by DBS.

  

Suppliers

 

The Bezeq Group has important relationships with several suppliers of hardware, software and related services that are used to operate its businesses. During 2015, no supplier accounted for more than 5% of the Bezeq Group’s total annual purchases, nor did any supplier account for more than 10% of total purchases in a specific segment of operation.

 

 7060 

 

 

Bezeq

 

Most of the equipment purchased by Bezeq for data communication, switching, transmission and radio systems has been specially modified or developed for its use, and the ability to obtain support other than through the manufacturer is limited.

Bezeq relies on manufacturer support from a number of its key suppliers for certain of its systems, and may have difficulty replacing them. Bezeq’s key suppliers include: (i) Alcatel Group (represented in Israel by Alcatel Telecom Israel Ltd.) in the areas of public switching and metro transmission, (ii) Dialogic Networks (Israel) Ltd. for migration exchanges for linking operators to Bezeq’s switching network, (iii) Comverse, Inc. for switching exchanges for end customers on the NGN network, (iv) the NGN of Adtran Holdings Ltd., (v) Oracle in the area of databases, (vi) EMC for hardware solutions for back-up, recovery and archiving of systems and infrastructures, (vii) VMware for infrastructure for the entire virtualization of Bezeq’s servers, and (viii) ECI TelecomJuniper Networks for systems that connect Bezeq’s network and business customers on its transmission network.Metro transmission.

 

Agreements with the key suppliers are generally long-term and usually include a warranty period for a specified period, followed by another period of maintenance or support. Where necessary, Bezeq may enter into an agreement with a supplier for the supply of support and/or maintenance services for further periods. These agreements usually contain various forms of recourse for Bezeq should the supplier breach the agreement.

 

Pelephone

 

Pelephone sells a wide range of cellular handsets and auxiliary accessories (such as batteries, hand-free kits, earphones, data cables and chargers). Pelephone also maintains spare parts to supply repair services to its customers and an inventory of used handsets.

Pelephone purchases handsets and accessories from a variety of suppliers and importers. Contractual engagements with most of the suppliers are based on framework agreements, which also set forth the technical support provided by the supplier for the equipment and spare parts and turnaround time for repairs. These agreements generally do not include a commitment of Pelephone to acquire a minimum quantity of devices and acquisitions are made by means of purchase orders. Generally, if an agreement with a particular supplier of equipment is cancelled, Pelephone can increase the quantity purchased from other suppliers or purchase equipment from a new supplier.

 

Pelephone has anOn October 1, 2016, a new agreement came into effect with Apple Distribution International for the purchase and distribution of iPhone handsets in Israel,iPhones, under which is in effect until May 2016. The agreement includes Pelephone’s undertakingPelephone agreed to purchase a minimum annual quantity of iPhone handsets. These handsets account forphones over an additional period of three years at the manufacturer's current prices on the date of purchase. Pelephone believes that similar to prior years, these quantities will constitute a substantial percentagesignificant portion of the handsets sold by Pelephone. If Pelephone failsdevices it expects to meetsell during the minimum quantities it may be in breachterm of the agreement, which may involve payment of damages. Other than Apple Distribution International, Pelephone is not dependent on any supplier for the purchase of handsets.contract.

 

The UMTS/HSPA and LTE network infrastructure equipment are manufactured by Ericsson. Pelephone acquires the UMTS/HSPA+ network equipment from Ericsson and has a long-term agreementagreements with Ericsson for the maintenance, support and upgrading of software for itsthe UMTS/HSPA+ network. We believeHSPA and an agreement for the deployment of the 4G LTE networks with Ericsson. Pelephone believes that Pelephone could be deemed to beit may become dependent on Ericsson regarding support for the support of4G LTE network and its UMTS/HSPA+ network. The CDMA network equipment is acquired from Nortel and Motorola, and Pelephone maintains such equipment independently.expansion. In addition, the cellular networks usenetwork uses transmission facilitiesnetworks, for which Bezeq is Pelephone’sPelephone's main supplier.

Bezeq International

 

Bezeq International has cooperation agreements with approximately 200 foreign operators for approximately 240 destinations worldwide. Since fixed-line broadband Internet infrastructure access services are provided to its subscribers by Bezeq and HOT, Bezeq International is dependent upon Bezeq and, to a lesser degree, HOT for domestic capacity in the provisionto provide its services. Most of its ISP services and for connecting the subscriber to the international exchange.

capacity that Bezeq International uses is transmitted via its wholly owned submarine cable. As backup, Bezeq International uses capacity purchased from Med Nautilus. Under its agreement with MedNautilus,Med Nautilus, Bezeq International purchased indefeasible rights of use to an unparticulara particular non-specific part of the communication capacity oftransferred by the undersea cable system operated by MedNautilusMed Nautilus between Israel and Europe for a period of up to 15 years from the date on which it started using this capacity (with an option to extend the period of use). The periods of use are at least until 2022 – 2027, depending on the date of the start of use of the capacity. In considerationBezeq International paid for suchthese rights of use Bezeq International paidin a non-recurringlump sum payment aroundshortly before the date on which it started using the capacity.

DBS

Terminal Equipment. DBS installs a receiver dish and other terminal equipment in its subscribers' homes, including decoders enabling reception of broadcasts and smart cards for decoding the encrypted broadcasts. The decoders are leased to subscribers for a fixed fee that is paid during the entire period the services are received, or are lent to subscribers. In addition,2016, DBS purchased decoders from two suppliers under framework agreements. HDPVR decoders, in October 2011, Bezeqa total amount of NIS -41 million, were purchased from Advanced Digital Broadcast S.A. ("ADB"), the decoder manufacturer, and Eurocom Digital Communications Ltd. ("Eurocom Digital Communications"), the importer that also provides product warranty for the decoders which ADB undertook under the agreement. Eurocom Digital Communications is controlled (indirectly) by Shaul Elovitch, the controlling shareholder of the Company (the "ADB Agreement"). HD Zapper decoders are purchased from Altech Multimedia International entered into an(Pty) Ltd. ("Altech"). In April 2016 DBS engaged in a framework agreement for the development and supply of advanced HDPVR decoders with MedNautilus to expandDraco Inc. (decoder supplier) and change the existing rights of useAltech (decoder manufacturer). DBS may become dependent upon these suppliers. The amounts for purchases from these suppliers in the international optic network that it operates, so that such rightsreporting year are not material to the Group. DBS amortizes the end equipment installation costs as part of use will serve as a backup for Bezeq International’s JONAH submarine cable.its property, plant and equipment.

 

On January 18, 2010, Bezeq International signed a partnership agreement with British Telecom for the provision of global communications services to Israeli and multi-national companies operating in Israel. As part of the strategic agreement, Bezeq International operates as a BT Alliance partner in Israel and markets IT services and products from British Telecom’s global range of services.

 7161 

 

 

Replacing a supplier with another supplier does not involve additional material costs, however a substantial preparatory period is required to adapt the decoders of the alternative supplier to the DBS broadcasting and transmission systems (which is also dependent on these service providers, Cisco), which could, in the event of the termination of the engagement at short notice, cause DBS loss of revenues.

Broadcasting equipment and computer and communications systems.DBS has its central broadcasting center in Kfar Saba and a secondary broadcasting center close to Re'em Junction from where it transmits its broadcasts. The broadcasting centers operate reception and broadcasting equipment, as well as computer and communication systems. The secondary broadcasting center is operated by a third party which provides services for operating and maintenance of the secondary broadcasting center for DBS under a contract which is valid until the end of 2018 (with DBS having an extension option).

 

DBSOperating and encryption systems.D.B.S. purchases set-top boxes from three suppliers. Under a framework agreement entered into in August 2000, as amended from time to time, among DBS, Advanced Digital Broadcast S.A., or ADB and Eurocom Digital. DBS purchases set-top boxes (including the PVR set-top boxes) from Eurocom Digital, which imports them from ADB and provides the warranty for the set-top boxes. Eurocom Digital is controlled by Mr. Shaul Elovitch, who is a controlling shareholder of Bezeq. In addition, DBS purchases HD set-top box zappers from Pace Micro Technology PLC and HD set-top box zappers DSD 4145 STB from Altech Multimedia International (Pty) Ltd.

In 2015, DBS acquired from NDS LimitedCisco Group companies ("Cisco" ) development, licensing, assimilation, maintenance and warranty services with regard to the operating systems of the broadcasting system and the decoders, and the hardware related to these services, including those connected to the encoding of DBS services, and viewing cards that allow the foregoing encoded content to be viewed.

Since January 2016, DBS purchases these services and products from Cisco Group companies, or Cisco, which is an affiliate of NDS, under an agreement signed between Cisco and DBS, which has replaced the engagement with NDS. According the agreement between Cisco and DBS, Cisco provides DBS with similar services to those provided by NDS, and provides products connected with the relevant systems and provides DBS with various licenses required for operating the systems and decoders. DBS is dependent upon the regular supply of these services and products, including integration of the various decoders that DBS uses for the operating system.viewed

 

For these services and products DBS pays Cisco one-time payments and periodic payments part of which are in a fixed amount and part are based on the number of active decoders of each type, and the ratio of part of the payments is fixed in the agreement as minimum annual amounts. The term of the agreement with Cisco is until December 2020 (with an automatic extension mechanism, unless one of the parties decides to end the agreement, subject to prior notice period as providedset in the Cisco agreement).agreement. In 2015,2016, DBS’s payments to NDSCisco were not material. DBS is dependent upon the regular supply of these services and products, including integration of the various decoders that DBS uses for its operating system.

Computerized billing system.DBS uses software and computer systems for managing its subscriber agreements, including its billing and collection system. In this context, DBS engaged in agreements with NetCracker Technology Solutions Ltd. and NetCracker Technology EMEA Limited (jointly "NetCracker").

DBS is dependent upon NetCracker's system and services due to their importance for managing and monitoring services and content purchased by subscribers and for billing its subscribers. System malfunctions or shutdown of these services to DBS could cause operational difficulties until the fault is repaired or the system/supplier is replaced. As of Reporting Date the current project agreement for services and technical support is until the end of 2019. In 2016, DBS’s payments to NetCracker were not material.

Space segment leasing agreement.Under an agreement with Spacecom, DBS leases Amos satellite space segments. The 2013 agreement is valid through 2028. Under the initial stage of the agreement, the space segments that were available for DBS’s use were on the Amos 2 and Amos 3 satellites. In September 2016, Spacecom informed DBS that Amos 2 had reached the end of its useful life, but that its commercial operation would continue indefinitely. DBS was informed by Spacecom that the Amos 2 satellite is expected to continue in commercial operation until mid-2017.

Under the terms of the 2013 agreement, DBS will lease space segments on the Amos 3 satellite (until 2022) at such time as Amos 2 satellite ceases to operate. In June 2016, during the course of a routine, periodic maneuver of the Amos 2 satellite, the channels broadcast to DBS customers were shut down for about two hours, during which time DBS transferred the broadcasts to the Amos 3 satellite. When the normal function of the Amos 2 satellite was restored, the broadcasts were returned to it and DBS resumed normal, ongoing operation to its subscribers.

In September 2016, an explosion occurred during ground fueling of the launch rocket for the Amos 6 satellite causing total loss of the satellite, which was scheduled to replace the Amos 2 satellite for DBS’s broadcasts.

In February 2017, the boards of directors of Bezeq and DBS approved DBS's entry into an addendum to the 2013 agreement with Spacecom, or the 2017 Spacecom Agreement. The 2017 Spacecom Agreement was approved at general meetings of Bezeq and Spacecom in April 2017.

On March 31, 2017, DBS ceased using space segments from the Amos 2 satellite after receiving notice from Spacecom that Amos 2 had reached the end of its life. DBS is currently using the Amos 3 and Amos 7 satellites.

The term of the 2017 Spacecom Agreement is until December 31, 2028, without changing the term of the 2013 agreement, subject to the early termination options described below. The satellites on which DBS will lease space segments are the: (i) Amos 3 satellite - that serves DBS at the present time; (ii) Amos 7 satellite - an existing satellite on which Spacecom owns rights to lease space segments and which, according to Spacecom, positioning was completed at the end of February 2017; and (iii) Amos 8 satellite - a new satellite that is expected to serve DBS once it enters into operation. Spacecom undertook to make all reasonable efforts to ensure that the Amos 8 satellite will enter into service no later than February 2021.

During the term of the 2017 Spacecom Agreement, and subject to availability, DBS is expected to lease 12 space segments from Spacecom on two different satellites, according to a division enumerated in the agreement. The agreement also regulates the availability of alternative segments to the leased space segments during the term of the agreement. The estimated total nominal cost for the duration of the term of the lease is $263 million, reflecting an average annual cost of $ 21.9 million, subject to a discount and reimbursement mechanism. The lease fee paid to Spacecom in 2016 amounted to NIS 27 million.65 million (approximately $17 million, after receiving a partial credit for the failure of the Amos 6 satellite.

62

The agreement provides for early termination without cause, subject to prior notice of 12 months and payment of a termination fee. There is also an early termination right in the event the commissioning of the Amos 8 satellite is delayed, or if the Amos 8 satellite is unavailable at the end of Amos 3 useful life, without requiring payment of any compensation.

DBS is materially dependent on Spacecom, as the exclusive holder of the rights and the sole provider of space segments used by DBS, which is also responsible for operation of the space segments.

 

Property

 

Bezeq

 

According to a settlement agreement entered into in 2004 between Bezeq, the Israel Land Administration, or ILA and the State of Israel, which concerns most of the real estate that was transferred to Bezeq pursuant to the 1984 asset transfer agreement with the State of Israel, the assets remaining in Bezeq’s possession have the status of a capitalized lease and are subject to the execution of individual lease contracts (contracts have been signed for approximately 110 of the 205 properties for which contracts are required). The settlement agreement allows Bezeq to enter into transactions and to improve the properties beyond the rights according to plans approved in the settlement agreement and it provides for a mechanism for payment to the ILA for such improvements, if undertaken, at the rate of 51% of the increase in value of the property following the enhancement (less part of the amounts paid for a betterment levy, if paid). The settlement agreement also provides that 17 properties must be returned to the ILA. Bezeq has returned 15 of those properties and the two remaining properties will be returned after Bezeq receives substitute properties, as provided in the settlement agreement.

 

72

The following is a list of Bezeq's real estate assets in accordance with the material rights in the asset. Bezeq also has interests (transition rights, etc.) in other real estate (such as for the construction of offices and for laying cables):

 

Right  Number of Assets   Area of the Plot (thousand sq. m.)   

Built Area

(thousand sq. m.)

  Notes Number of
Assets
 Area of the Plot
(thousand sq. m.)
  

Built Area

(thousand
sq. m.)

  Notes
Ownership, lease or right of lease  340   920   170  Of this, 330 assets cover an area of 890 thousand sq. m., and 140 thousand sq. m. built up are assets for communication needs, and the remainder for administration needs.
 
30 are jointly owned with the Ministry of Communications and/or the Israel Postal Co. Ltd., with whom an agreement was signed for defining and regulating the rights of the parties in these properties. The parties operate as required by the orders of the agreement, and inter alia, to separate joint debits and systems.
 
  330  900��  150  Of these assets, 330 properties cover an area of 870 thousand sq. m., and 120 thousand sq. m. built up are assets for communication needs, and the remainder for administration needs.
         
          25 are jointly owned with the Ministry of Communications and/or the Israel Postal Co. Ltd., with whom an agreement was signed for defining and regulating the rights of the parties in these properties. The parties operate as required by the orders of the agreement, and inter alia, to separate joint debits and systems.
Possession (authorized/possession rights by law)  40   2.5   0.8  Assets in Israeli settlements in the Administrated Territories, all for communication needs. There is no written regulation of the contractual rights for these properties, but in Bezeq's opinion this does not create material exposure.
 
  40  1.5  0.8  Assets in Israeli settlements in the Administrated Territories, all for communication needs. There is no written regulation of the contractual rights for these properties, but in Bezeq's opinion this does not create material exposure.
Lease  330   30   70  310 assets, out of which 11 thousand sq. m. built up are for communication needs and the remainder for administration needs. Out of which, approximately 4 sq.m. built up are sublet.
 
  320  30  65  305 properties, out of which 7 thousand sq. m. built up are for communication needs and the remainder for administration needs. Out of which, approximately 2 sq.m. built up are sublet.
Miscellaneous rights in 'residential rooms'  1,050   10   18  These are rooms for cables and installations for residential communications.
 
For most of the assets there is no arrangements for rights in writing (for example, the ILA, settlement entities, the entrepreneurs of the projects in which the properties are located, and house committees).
 
  1,160  10  18  These are rooms for cables and installations for residential communications.
 
For most of the assets there is no arrangements for rights in writing (for example, the ILA, settlement entities, the entrepreneurs of the projects in which the properties are located, and house committees).
Right to receive areas for warehouses and offices  An asset in Sakia (near the Mesubim junction)   7 net   -  See below.  An asset in Sakia (near the Mesubim junction)   7 net   -  See below.

 

Further to Bezeq's negotiationsIn April 2013, an authorization agreement was signed with the planning authorities to exercise its rights under the authorization agreement between Bezeq and ILAIsrael Lands Administration for an area of 11.5 hectares signed in April 2013,Sakia. According to the district committee in April 2015 filed and published for objectionsprovisions of the authorization agreement, Bezeq designed a detailed outline plan for the property, setting out the purpose, use, building rights and building provisions for zoning of the land in the plan. On October 26, 2015, the district committee approved validationMay 2, 2016, approval of the outline plan.plan was published in the Official Gazette and it entered into force. Subsequently, Bezeq is expected to sign a lease agreement for the property with respect to a net area of 7 hectares. Bezeq is reviewing the different options available for exercising its rights in the property, including the option of selling it or part thereof, some of which may lead to recording of a material gain in a volume that, according to Bezeq's initial estimation and prior to performing any of the relevant tests, could reach hundreds of millionsthousands of NIS.NIS (at the date of the financial statements, a property appraiser has estimated the fair value of the rights in the land at NIS 460 million.

Bezeq's rights in a considerable number of its real estate assets are not registered in the Lands Registry and therefore they correspond to contractual rights. Bezeq is in the process of registering in its name those properties which can be registered in the Lands Registry.

63

On March 10, 2004, a settlement agreement among Bezeq, the Administration and the State was validated in a court decision. The settlement agreement concerns most of the real estate assets transferred to Bezeq under the asset transfer agreement signed for commencement of Bezeq's business activity. The settlement agreement provided that the assets remaining in Bezeq's possession have the status of capitalized leases and subject to the execution of individual lease contacts, Bezeq will be entitled to make any transaction in the properties and to enhance them. The settlement agreement sets out a mechanism for payment to the Administration for enhancement actions in the properties, if undertaken, beyond the rights according to plans approved by 1993 as set out in the Agreement, at the rate of 51% of the increase in value of the property following the enhancement and less part of amount paid for a betterment levy or to the Administration for an increase in value, if a betterment levy was paid. The settlement agreement also requires the return of 17 assets to the State through the Administration, on various dates ending in 2010. Bezeq has returned 15 of properties and two additional properties will be returned after Bezeq receives substitute properties, as provided in the settlement agreement.

 

Following a new review by Bezeq's management concerning the sale of Bezeq's real estate assets,by Bezeq's management, the Board of Directors of Bezeq approved further sales of assets which are not active and/orinactive /or which can be relatively easily vacated without incurring significant expenses. The transition to thedeployment of Bezeq’s NGN allows Bezeq to increase the efficiency of theits network and to sell some of the real estate assets that will be vacated as a result of the transition. During 2015,2016, Bezeq sold 1614 such properties, having a total area of 30,00018,200 sq.m. of land and 36,00020,200 sq.m. of built up, structures, for approximately NIS 273107 million. 

 

According to Bezeq’s estimates, the future sale of real estate assets that are not activeinactive or that can easily be vacated without incurring significant expenses and for which Bezeq has no use after they are vacated, may generate significant capital gains for Bezeq, which may,that in the aggregate over the coming years, reach significant amounts estimated atmay total hundreds of millions of shekels (before tax). It should be emphasized that thisbefore tax. Bezeq’s estimate also relates to real estate assets where no concrete decision has yet been made to sell them, and there is no certainty regarding the timing of their sale.sale, if any. The estimate is based on appraisals prepared for some of the assets, some of which are not final or current, as well as to internal estimates prepared by Bezeq (including with respect to assets that were not appraised at all). SomeBezeq. In addition, the sale of thesesome of the assets may not be easily sold,involve difficulties, including if there is noa lack of demand or there are localvarious planning board limitations. At present,restrictions. Bezeq is unable to foresee what if any, consideration will be received upon the saleor when any of these assets.real estate assets will be sold.

73

 

Pelephone

 

Pelephone does not own any of its sites and leases the premises that it uses for its operations from others, including Bezeq. Pelephone’s radio and switching sites are spread out around the country and are leased for various periods (in many instances, for a period of five years and Pelephone has an option to extend the agreements for another five years).

 

Pelephone’s headquarters are located in Givatayim, Israel and cover a total area of 17,800 square meters. The lease for these premises expires on December 31, 2020. Pelephone has an option to terminate the lease, under certain circumstances, commencing in 2017. Pelephone leases 31 service and sale centers throughout Israel and has additional lease agreements for warehouses, offices and telephone call centers that it uses for its operations.

 

Some of the radio sites leased by Pelephone are in areas owned by the ILA. Pelephone previously entered into an agreement with the ILA to use land in those areas for the construction and operation of communications sites for the period ended December 31, 2010. From 2010 negotiations were held with the ILA to conclude the terms for further use of the sites in the ILA areas. In June 2013, Pelephone entered into a framework agreement with the ILA for the use of land in the areas owned by the ILA for the construction and operation of communications sites for the period from January 1, 2011 until December 31, 2019, which agreement regulates, among other things, the fee for the use of the land.

 

Bezeq International

 

Bezeq International's property plant and equipment include switching and Internet equipment, marine cable, PBX equipment, office equipment, computers, vehicles and leasehold improvements.

Bezeq International usesutilizes Veraz SoftSwitch switches. These switches are used to route itsBezeq International’s voice traffic. The value-added services, including dialing cards, are based on an intelligent network. Bezeq International’s technological infrastructures, which support voice, data and Internet systems, are deployed at six sites, inside and outside Israel, in orderinter alia, to provide services with high survivability.

Bezeq International's intangible assets include licenses, software and discounted development costs. Bezeq International uses software and computer systems, some under purchased licenses and others which were developed by its IT department. Many of these licenses are limited in time and are periodically renewed. The primary systems used by Bezeq International are an Oracle ERP system and an IBM customer billing system.

 

Bezeq International has long-term agreements for the lease of the two main buildings in which it is based. The lease period for one building ends inof the buildings is until March 2024, withsubject to several exit options for Bezeq International during this period. The lease period of the other building is until December 2019 (withwith four equal extension options until 2027).2027. Bezeq International has other lease agreements for warehouses (including a main logistics center) and for buildings where it operates the call centers that it uses for its operations.

 

DBS

DBS’s central broadcasting center is located in Kfar Saba, Israel. DBS’s secondary broadcasting center is operated by a third party in accordance with an agreement valid until the end of 2018 (with an extension option available to DBS). DBS’s two broadcasting centers contain reception and transmission equipment, as well as computer and communication systems.

DBS leases a number ofseveral real estate assets which serve asproperties for its offices, customer service centers, broadcast centers, logistics centers and employee recruitment centers. DBS’s principaloperations. Its head offices and central broadcastmain broadcasting center are located on leased land in Kfar Saba under an agreement that expiresSaba. The lease periods for these sites expire in 2019. The balance of2019 and the lease periods for the remainingother properties leased by DBS vary from a few months3 to approximately six6.5 years (assuming(these periods are based on the assumption that DBS exerciseswill exercise its options to extend suchthese leases).

DBS recently entered into an agreement for a new logistics center in Modi’in, Israel, for a period of ten years, with an option to terminate the agreement after five years.

 

Intellectual Property

 

Trademarks

 

We are the registered owner of the trademark “B Communications” in Israel.

74

 

The Bezeq Group uses a variety of trade names and trademarks in its business. Bezeq has approximately 190 trademarks that are registered or are in the process of being registered in Israel, including its denominative trademark “Bezeq,” the trademark “NGN Next Generation Network” and its logo “B.” Pelephone owns a number of trademarks registered in Israel, including its denominative trademark “Pelephone.” Bezeq International owns a number of trademarks registered in Israel, including its denominative trademark “Bezeq International” and the trademark “Private NGN.” DBS owns a number of trademarks registered in Israel, including its denominative trademark “YES.”

 

64

Broadcast Rights and Copyrights

 

DBS licenses some of its television programming content for the DBS suite of channels from third-party content providers. DBS also enters into license agreements with producers of independent channels which it broadcasts over its network. In addition, DBS enters into agreements with third parties for the production of content and has the right to broadcast such content over its network (typically on an exclusive basis for an initial periodrights of time) and in most cases, DBS is entitled to use other rights to the content and share the revenues stemming from additional usetwo types of thevideo content.

Content purchased from third parties, including content and channels, that own the broadcasting rights thereto;

Content which DBS invests in producing (in full or in part), and in addition to the actual right to include the content in its broadcasts, DBS generally also has rights in such content, at the rates specified in agreements with the producers. In most instances, DBS is also entitled to issue authorizations to use the rights and share the revenues stemming from additional use of the content, in addition to DBS broadcasting thereof

The broadcast and distribution of content by DBS onover various media involves the payment of royalties to the owners of copyrights includingand performance rights to music, sound recordings, scripts and directing of content, and for secondary broadcasting included under the Israeli Copyright Law, 2007 and the Performers and Broadcasters Rights Law. Royalty paymentsLaw, 1984. Such royalties are made in accordance with blanket licenses with certainpaid to several organizations operating in Israel, that collectfor collecting royalties on behalf of the owners of the intellectual property rights.rights, under blanket licenses. Royalty payments under these licenses are, at times, based on a fixed payment and sometimes on various pricing methods, and with respect to some of the organizations, DBS may be required to pay additional amounts as royalties for transmitting content via certain media, and in amounts that DBS estimates are not expected to be material.

Given the many content providers from which DBS purchases broadcast rights, DBS does not have a main content provider and is not materially dependent on any single content provider. However, with respect to broadcasts of Israeli sports, at the date of this report DBS is dependent on the purchase of the broadcast rights for local sports channels from two providers, and the term of the contract with one of them terminates at the end of 2018.

 

In October 2012,2016, DBS entered into a settlement agreement and license agreement with the Association of Music Composers, Writers and Producers in Israel Ltd., or ACUM, an authors’ right society in Israel, following a dispute regarding the amount of royalties to be paid by DBS in addition to the advance it had paidNIS 311 million for the usepurchase of works whose rights are protected by ACUM for the period from 2003 to 2011. Under the agreements, DBS has a license to broadcast works whose rights are protected by ACUM until December 31, 2016, and it has agreed to settle all of ACUM’s claims from 2003 until 2011 with respect to past royalties and has also agreed on royalty rates for 2012 to 2016.rights.

 

Employees

 

As ofOn December 31, 2015,2016, we havehad five employees. These employees who also provideprovided services to Internet Gold. Our fivedirect employees are all located in Israel and are not represented by any labor union. Since our inception, we have not experienced any labor-related work stoppages and believe that our relations with our employees are good. We have entered into an arrangement with Internet Gold according to which our employees provide services to both companies and each company will pay 50% of their compensation. We entered into a similar arrangement with Internet Gold and Eurocom Communications with respect to the management services supplied by Mr. Doron Turgeman to the three companies.

 

As of December 31, 2015,2016, the Bezeq Group employed 12, 61511,901 persons, of whom 5,9865,649 persons were employed by Bezeq, 2,6792,594 persons were employed by Pelephone, 1,9661,905 persons were employed by Bezeq International and 1,9841,753 persons were employed by DBS.

 

Bezeq

 

AsThe number of Bezeq employees as at December 31, 2015, Bezeq employed 5,9862016 was 5,649 (compared with 5,896 employees at the end of 2015). The decrease in the number of employees in 2016 compared with 5,964 employees2015 stems primarily from streamlining as a result of December 31, 2014.continued improvement of processes and technological developments in the interface with the customers. 90% of Bezeq’s employees are employed under a collective agreement (out of which 58%60% are permanent employees and the remainder are nonpermanentnon-permanent employees). The remainder of Bezeq’s employees (10%) are employed under personal agreements, not under collective agreements.

 

Bezeq’s BoardBezeq has 9 directors, of Directors currently consists of 11whom three are external directors, including four external,one is an employee-director, and two are independent directors (who are not external directors) pursuant to Section 249B to the Israeli Companies Law and two employee representatives. Our Chairman, Mr. Shaul Elovitch,Law. In addition, senior management has 11 members (of which one is also serves as the Chairmana member of the BoardBezeq Group’s headquarters) and four members of Directorsthe Bezeq Group headquarters (one of Bezeq and Internet Gold.whom will begin his term of office on April 23, 2017).

 

The members of the senior management and members of the Bezeq Group’s headquarters are employed under personal agreements which include, inter alia, pension coverage, payment of bonuses based on targets, and additional retirement benefits. Bezeq also grants options to the members of senior management at its discretion.advance notice months before retirement.

 

Bezeq’s laborLabor relations in Bezeq are regulated in collective agreements between Bezeq, and the representatives of BezeqCompany employees and the New General Federation of Workers ("Histadrut"), and in personal agreements. BezeqCompany employees are also subject to expansion orders to certain general collective agreements such as cost-of-living increment agreements.

 

In December 2006, a special collective agreement was signed between Bezeq, the employee union and the Histadrut, or the Special Collective Agreement, regulating labor relations in Bezeq following the transfer of control in Bezeq from the State to Ap.Sb.Ar. Holdings Ltd., Bezeq's previous controlling shareholder, and set a new organizational structure for Bezeq.

 

65

Under the agreement,terms of the Special Collective Agreement, all the agreements, arrangements and traditional behavior in Bezeq prior to execution of the agreement,Special Collective Agreement, including the mechanism for linkage of wages to the public sector, would continue to apply only to the veteran permanent employees of Bezeq to which the Special Collective Agreement would apply, subject to changes inserted specifically ininto the agreement.Special Collective Agreement. The hiring of existing and future temporary workers would be on the basis of monthly/hourly wage agreements based on a wage model according to occupation, with high managerial flexibility. The agreementSpecial Collective Agreement sets out restrictions on certain kinds of future organizational changes, and a mechanism of notification, negotiation and arbitration with the union in the event of organizational changes. The agreement also permitted Bezeq to terminate

During the employment of 245 permanent employees in eachterm of the years 2009-2013.

75

UnderSpecial Collective Agreement, two employee-directors who are proposed by the agreement, two employee-directorsunion will serve on theBezeq's Board of Directors of Bezeq, who would be proposed by the union (subject to their approval by the Board of Directors and their election by the general meeting). The employee-directors are not entitled to payment for their service as directors, and will not participate in Board discussions of the terms of employment of senior employees.

 

On December 19, 2010, an amendment was made to the collective agreement, extending it to December 31, 2015 (with an option for extension to December 31, 2017). The main points of the amendment are the extension of the retirement arrangements under the collective agreement to December 31, 2016. Under these retirement arrangements, Bezeq may, at its discretion, terminate the employment of up to 245 permanent employees in each of the years until 2016. The agreementSpecial Collective Agreement also defines the "New Permanent Employee," the"new permanent employee", whose terms of whose employment differ from those of a veteran permanent employee of Bezeq (under the collective agreement): his wage model is according to Bezeq's wage policy and market wages; at the end of his employment in Bezeq he is entitled to increased severance pay only (based(depending on the number of years of employment).

On August 30, 2015, Bezeq's Board of Directors adopted another amendment to the collective agreement, extending the collective agreement and retirement arrangements until December 31, 2021, and their amendment. As part of the retirement arrangements, Bezeq will be entitled,may, at its discretion, to terminate the employment of 203 permanent employees (including new permanent employees) each year. year (relevant for 2017-2021).

The estimated costlatest amendment to the Agreement was approved by Bezeq's Board of Directors on August 30, 2015, under which the agreement, including wage improvementsAgreement and excluding employeethe retirement which is subjectarrangement were extended to Bezeq's discretion, is NIS 280 million throughout the agreement period (of which NIS 30.0 million are contingent on Bezeq’s expenses).December 31, 2021.

 

In 2015,2016, 90 permanent employees retired under the early retirement expenses ofplan and early retirement was approved for another 58 employees in a pension track, under the terms of the new collective agreement of December 2006 and its amendments, amounted to NIS 117 million. During 2015, 55 tenured employees retired from Bezeq, based on the early retirement plan. The Board also approved the termination of employment of additional employees in an increased severance pay track in accordance with Bezeq’s needs.

On December 22, 2015, Bezeq's Board approved a budget of NIS 103 million for the early retirement of 78 employees in 2016 under an early retirement track and severance pay track,2017 in accordance with the conditions of the collective labor agreement offrom December 2006, and amendment of December 2010. The Board also approved an additional budget of NIS 12.5 million foras amended in August 2015, (aboveat a budget of NIS 30 million78.5 million.

On March 22, 2017, the Board of Directors of Bezeq approved an expansion of the Bezeq Group’s headquarters staff to assist the Board of Directors in implementing the tasks involved in setting out the strategy and oversight conferred upon it according to the Companies Law, and also in exercising certain performance and management powers stemming from assuming these powers with respect to the activity of the subsidiaries and activities that may be absorbed by Bezeq in future, insofar as they are absorbed, within the context of mergers and acquisitions. This includes a decision to appoint a director of strategy and business development for early retirement in 2015).the Bezeq Group and the appointment of a legal advisor.

 

Agreements with alternative entities that replaced the Makefet Fund in everything relating to early retirement arrangements of Bezeq employeesemployees.

As of 2005, the early retirement arrangements of Bezeq's employees is implemented through alternative entities in place of the Makefet Fund. On April 24, 2014, Bezeq and Menorah Mivtachim Insurance Ltd., or Menorah, signed an agreement regulating pension payments for the early retirement of BezeqCompany employees and provision for the payment of the remainder old-age and survivors’ pensions to employees who retire from Bezeq under the special collective retirement agreement signed by Bezeq, the Union and the Histadrut on February 12, 2014. The Commissioner of Insurance approved the policy and it entered into force on March 31, 2016. Accordingly, as of May 1, 2016, Menorah issued policies for retiring employees, and payment of the annuities and related payments is made on the basis of these policies. The agreement period is until the end of 2016.2016 and in February 2017 it was extended for a further three years.

Management agreement.On June 1 2016, Bezeq entered an agreement between Bezeq and Eurocom Communications granting Bezeq regular management and advisory services for a period of three years as from June 1, 2016 in consideration of NIS 6,432 thousand per year.

Pelephone

 

The table below provides data with respect to the number of Pelephone employees at December 31, 20142016 and December 31, 2015:

 Number of employees 
Department Number of employees  December 31, 2016  December 31, 2015 
 December 31, 2015 December 31, 2014 
Management and HQ  186   201   189   186 
Marketing  43   46   48   43 
Service – Private customers  1,424   1,719 
Business customers  1,367   1,424 
Business customers  375   362   353   375 
Logistics and terminal equipment division  185   199   202   185 
Engineering and information systems  466   474   435   466 
Total  2,679   3,001   2,594   2,679 

 

 7666 

 

 

Remuneration plans forThe total number of employees in the above table includes employees employed in part time positions. The total number of positions at Pelephone at December 31, 2016 was 2,176 and managers

Pelephone customarily gives its employees and managers bonuses and incentives on a monthly, quarterly or annual basis, based on compliance with defined goals and the type of work carried out by the employee.2,234 at December 31, 2015.

 

Terms of employment

The majority of Pelephone's employees are employed under monthly or annual contracts, based on the professions and positions in which they are employed. Most of the service and sales employees are shift workers who work part time and are employed on an hourly basis. Pelephone's other employees are employed under monthly contracts, and some of them are employed under a monthly contract with a global addition for extra hours. The employment contracts include confidentiality, non-competition, and intellectual property restrictions.

 

Voluntary retirement

In 2015 it was decidedDecember 2013, Pelephone signed a collective labor agreement between Pelephone and the New General Federation of Workers and Pelephone's workers committee (the "Committee"), which will apply to retire 46all Pelephone's employees, under a voluntary redundancy plan with an increased compensation track,other than its senior management and certain employees in predefined positions. The agreement stipulates that Pelephone employees employed at a total costdate of NIS 5 million. These 46signing of the agreement will receive employment tenure after 36 months and 48 months for new employees retired atjoining Pelephone subsequent to signing. In addition, the beginningagreement sets out mechanisms for integrating the Committee in processes relating to placement, mobility and termination of 2016.employment of Pelephone's tenured employees.

 

AnnouncementThe agreement also provides that it is valid until December 31, 2016 and following this date, it will be extended for additional periods as provided unless one of the parties seeks to change it. At the present time negotiations are underway for a labor disputenew collective agreement between Pelephone and the New General Federation of Workers and the Workers' Committee.

On August 3, 2015, Pelephone was informed byFebruary 7, 2017 the New General Federation of Workers - Cellular, Internet and High-Tech Workers Union, thatannounce a labor dispute was announced pursuant to the Settlement of Labor Disputes Law, 1957 and that a strike would commence on August 17, 2015.starting February 22, 2017 onwards. According to the announcement, the issuesmatter under dispute were Pelephone's unilateral decisions regarding organizational / structural changesis the deadlock in the negotiations for a new collective agreement. On February 27, 2017 Pelephone announced that impacted working conditions and the expansion of the business segments and their scope that Pelephone outsources. The employees demanded negotiations regarding these issues.

Pelephone rejected the claims of the Workers Committee against it, and several meetings were held with the representatives of the Workers Committee under which Pelephone presentedvarious services provided to its detailed responsescustomers may be impaired due to the claimslabor disruptions and strikes that began on February 22, 2017. These disruptions are steadily worsening, and have caused among other things, the failure to provide service and support for customer needs, including repair of the Workers Committee. Pelephone filed an applicationfaulty terminal equipment and a delay in handling malfunctions of technology systems. Efforts to the Regional Labor Court for interim relief to prevent continuing sanctions and labor disruptions. In September 2015, a hearing was held on the application, at the end of which the parties accepted the recommendation of the Court to continue intensiveinitiate negotiations under the auspices of the Court and without either party taking actions. The parties requested another extension from the Court during which they agreed to report the outcome of the negotiations. The next hearing is set for the beginning of May 2016.are continuing.

 

Bezeq International

 

The following table provides data relating to the number of persons employed by Bezeq International, including outsourced employees, at December 31, 20142016 and December 31, 2015:

 

 Number of employees 
Department Number of employees  December 31, 2016  December 31, 2015 
 December 31, 2015  December 31, 2014 
Head office employees  1,157   1,173   1,169   1,157 
Sales and service representatives  809   759   736   809 
Total  1,966   1,932   1,905   1,966 

 

Bezeq International has a number of employee groups whose wage structure includes a component of performance-linked commissions and incentives. These groups include sales employees, telephone sales representatives and telephone service and support representatives. Employees have arrangements for pension and health insurance that are fully subsidized by Bezeq. Bezeq International is not a party to any collective bargaining agreement.

Bezeq International perceives its employees as a substantial asset that it must retain and nurture. In 2015, Bezeq International invested in excess of 2,000 hours on training employees to reinforce professionalism, authority and technical skills, sales management training, service expertise and more. In 2015, more than 1,000 of the company's employees participated in a range of personal development courses and professional and managerial reserves were developed of the organization's talents. Approximately 240 company managers developed their business managerial skills in the annual training program.

 

77

In March 2014, Bezeq International received notice from the Histadrut that more than one third of Bezeq International's employees had chosen to sign up as members and therefore it is the representative workers union of Bezeq International’s employees. On January 12, 2016 Bezeq International signed a collective agreement with the New General Federation of Workers and the Bezeq International Workers Committee.Committee that expires on December 31, 2018. The key terms of the agreement include:

 

The agreement will apply to all Bezeq International employees other than the executive management (VPs and those who report directly to them) and another group of employees and managers that the parties agreed upon.

 
The period after which Bezeq International's employees will be considered as tenured is 36 months, with an option to extend the period for an additional six months with the Committee's agreement.

 
The agreement prescribes mechanisms that include the Committee in decision making with regard to the termination of the employment of tenured employees, disciplinary measures imposed against them, and the execution of organizational changes.

 67 

The agreement also provides for annual wage hikes and other financial benefits (such as subsidies, summer camp and welfare activities) to be provided by Bezeq International for its employees during the agreement period.

 
The agreement is valid until December 31, 2018. Thereafter the agreement will automatically be renewed for additional 12 month periods, unless one of the parties gives notice of their intention to change the agreement.

DBS

 

The following table provides data with respect to the number of persons employed by DBS at December 31, 20142016 and December 31, 2015:

 

  Number of Employees 
Division As at December 31, 2016  As at December 31, 2015 
Marketing  36   37 
Customer Division  951   1,169 
Content Division  41   40 
Engineering  114   118 
Finance and Operations  127   115 
Human Resources  62   60 
Regulation and Legal Management  10   11 
Technologies and Information  134   141 
Management and Spokesperson  8   7 
Sales  270   286 
Total  1,753   1,984 

Division Number of Employees 
  At Dec 31, 2015  At Dec 31, 2014 
Marketing  37   36 
Customer Service  1,169   1,227 
Content Division  40   64 
Engineering  118   106 
Finance and Operations  115   106 
Human Resources  60   59 
Regulation and Legal Management  11   10 
Technologies and Information  141   141 
Management and Spokesperson  7   5 
Sales  286   291 
Total  1,984   2,042 

In September 2016, DBS signed a collective agreement with the New General Federation of Workers (which represents DBS workers) and the Workers Committee at DBS. Thereafter the agreement will automatically be renewed for further period of 12 months each, unless one of the parties gives notice of their intention to change the agreement. The agreement applies to all DBS employees (other than a certain percentage of employees and managers). The agreement provides, among other things, the periods after which DBS employees will become tenured employees, mechanisms for involving the Workers Committee in decision making concerning employment and termination of the employment of tenured employees at DBS, as well as annual wage increments and other general benefits DBS will grant to its employees during the term of the agreement.

 

DBS employees are employed under personal employment agreements, on the basis of a monthly salary or an hourly wage, with some of the employees also entitled to performance-based compensation. The employment agreements are generally for an undefined period, and each party may terminate the agreement by prior notice in accordance with the agreement or applicablethe law. DBS employs personnelpeople in some of its departments on the weekly day of rest and on days of rest prescribed by the State, of Israel, and it has an appropriate permit for such employment.

On February 18, 2015, DBS received a notice from the Histadrut that more than one thirdcustomarily awards its officers and managers, as well as some of DBS’sits employees, had joined the Histadrutannual bonuses based on attaining goals and therefore it is the representative workers union of DBS’ employees. On February 24, 2015, after reviewing the enrollment forms that DBS received from the Histadrut, DBS confirmed the Histadrut's notice and recognized it as the representative workers union of DBS.performance assessment.

 

C.Organizational Structure

 

Internet Gold, a public company, whose shares are listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market and the TASE, owned 64.78% of our outstanding ordinary shares as of April 18,25, 2016. Internet Gold is controlled by Messrs. Shaul and Yossef Elovitch, directly and through their control of Eurocom Communications. Together they held 63.80%hold 61.14% of Internet Gold’s ordinary shares as ofApril 1825, 2016. Eurocom Communications is controlled by Mr. Shaul Elovitch, the chairman of our board of directors and the chairman of the board of directors of Internet Gold and Eurocom Communications.

 

Our interest in Bezeq is held mostly by our wholly-owned subsidiaries. As of April 18,25, 2016, we held a 26.34% ownership interest in Bezeq.

 

 7868 

 

 

D.Property, Plants and Equipment

 

Our corporate headquarters are located in an approximately 150 square metera facility in Ramat Gan, Israel, which we lease from Eurocom Communications at a token rent. The lease is for a three-year period, which may be extended each year for an additional one year period on the mutual consent of the parties.

 

ITEM 4A.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

 

Not applicable.

 

ITEM 5.OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS

 

A.Operating Results

 

The following discussion of our results of operations should be read together with our audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes, which appear elsewhere in this annual report. The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our current plans, estimates and beliefs and involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include those discussed below and elsewhere in this annual report.

 

Overview

 

We are the controlling shareholder of Bezeq and we currently own 26.34% of Bezeq’s outstanding shares, and consolidate Bezeq’s financial results into our financial statements.

The Bezeq Group operates the most comprehensive telecommunications infrastructure in Israel, with a broad range of telecommunications services across all of its markets. Through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, the Bezeq Group is a leading provider in Israel of fixed-line telephony services and fixed-line broadband Internet infrastructure access services, cellular telephony services, ISP services, ILD services, international and domestic data transfer and network services and ICT, pay television services and other communications infrastructures and services. In each of these markets, the Bezeq Group holds a significant market share.

 

Key Factors Affecting the Businesses of the Bezeq Group

 

The operations of the Bezeq Group and the operating metrics discussed below have been, and will likely continue to be, affected by certain key factors as well as certain historical events and actions. The key factors affecting the business of the Bezeq Group and its results of operations include, among others, competition, government regulation, the build out of infrastructures, macro- economic and political risks, churn, seasonality, impact of currency fluctuations and inflation, effective corporate tax rate, conditions in Israel and trade relations. For further discussion of the factors affecting our results of operations, see “Risk Factors.”

 

Competition

 

The Bezeq Group faces significant competition from established and new competitors who provide fixed-line telephony, fixed-line broadband Internet infrastructure access, cellular telephony, ISP and pay television services. In addition to the entrance of new competitors, competition among the existing communications groups in Israel is intensifying. Four main groups, each consisting of companies under common or joint control, hold a significant share of the communications market in Israel today: the Bezeq Group, the Cellcom Group, the Partner Group and the HOT Group.today. The Bezeq Group’s three principal competitors may in some cases be required to comply with fewer regulations because, among other reasons, they use different technologies to provide their services or do not own their own fixed-line network.

 

Bezeq expects competition to continue to increase amid the changing legislation in Israel and consolidation in the telecommunications industry that permits certain service providers to market a combination of fixed-line telephony, fixed-line broadband Internet infrastructure access, ISP and pay television services (a “bundle”) for an aggregate price which is lower than the price of the individual products and services in the bundle. The Bezeq Group is currently subject to restrictions on marketing bundles, which are stricter than the restrictions applicable to its competitors.

 

Fixed-Line Telephony. Competition in the fixed-line telephony market is intense. We believe that competition in this market will continue to increase due to the low barriers to entry and regulations permitting new service providers who receive a license to provide telephony services using voice over VoIP or VoB technology. While such services utilize the fixed-line broadband Internet infrastructure access network owned by either Bezeq or HOT, and therefore require end-users to purchase fixed-line broadband Internet infrastructure access services directly from Bezeq or HOT, such services have reduced demand for fixed-line telephony services.

Fixed-Line Broadband Internet Infrastructure Access. Bezeq’s principal competitor in the fixed-line broadband Internet infrastructure access service market is HOT, which is currently the only other fixed-line broadband Internet infrastructure access provider in Israel. In addition, Bezeq’s fixed-line broadband Internet infrastructure access services business faces competition from cellular telephony operators as they are increasingly able to utilize a combination of technologically advanced handsets and high bandwidth technologies, such as UMTS and LTE technology.

79

Cellular Telephony. The cellular telephony market in Israel is characterized by saturation and a very high penetration level in excess of 100%. In recent years, competition in the cellular telephony industry has intensified. This has led to lower prices and higher customer churn rates, which in turn has affected the Bezeq Group’s results. Until 2012, three cellular telephony operators, Cellcom, Partner and Pelephone, led the Israeli cellular telephony market. During 2012, a number of other cellular telephony operators began to operate, including Golan Telecom and HOT Mobile, which has led to intensified competition, resulting in higher churn rates among the existing operators, a significant decrease in tariffs and, consequently, a decrease in profits. Pelephone’s current principal competitors, Cellcom, Partner and HOT Mobile (since February 2012), also provide ISP services and fixed- line communications, and they market a variety of joint service packages. Pelephone also faces competition from MVNOs that provide cellular telephony services under their own brand using the network infrastructure of another service provider.

International Telephony. The ILD market in Israel is characterized by a high degree of competition. At the end of 2013, there were eight companies offering ILD services to private and business customers in Israel. Changes in licensing policies and the expanded use of VoIP technology have significantly reduced the barriers of entry into this market. In addition, during 2012, cellular telephony operators began to offer ILD services as part of the unlimited packages they offered.

Internet Service Providers. Access to broadband Internet in Israel requires households to purchase Internet access services from a licensed ISP and broadband Internet infrastructure access services from a separate provider. While there are only two fixed-line broadband Internet infrastructure access service providers in Israel many telecommunication companies hold ISP licenses in Israel. The Israeli ISP market is a saturated market and as competitors are typically unable to differentiate themselves based on price, they attempt to differentiate themselves primarily by strengthening customer loyalty; however, competition has led to increased churn rates and reduced income per customer.

Pay Television. The Israeli television market is characterized by a very high penetration rate and an increasing emphasis on new television technology, in particular digital, HD and interactive television services, such as VOD, requiring high-bandwidth and bi-directional distribution platforms. In the multi-channel pay television market, DBS and HOT are the only two companies in Israel licensed to provide multi-channel pay television broadcasts. Other factors impacting competition in the market include the availability of free-to-air television DTT channels and the increasing availability and quality of video content offered over the Internet and cellular networks, which is not currently regulated and does not require designated infrastructure.

Government Regulation

 

The Bezeq Group operates in a highly regulated industry in Israel, which limits its flexibility in managing its business efficiently, and may increase its administrative and operational expenses and limit its revenue. The Bezeq Group is subject to government supervision and regulation relating to, among other things:

 

regulations requiring structural separation between the members of the Bezeq Group;

 

regulations restricting the Bezeq Group’s ability to market bundles;

 

price regulation for certain services that the Bezeq Group provides;

 

69

rules and regulations imposed on telecommunications service providers with significant market share;

 

rules governing the interconnection between different telephone networks and the interconnection rates that the Bezeq Group can charge and pay;

 

regulations governing the prohibition of exit-fees or cancellation charges;

 

regulations requiring the Bezeq Group to grant other telecommunications operators access to its infrastructure;

 

regulations governing roaming charges and other billing and customer service matters;

 

rules for authorizations, licensing, acquisitions, renewals, pledging and transfers of licenses;

 

requirements covering a variety of operational areas such as land use, health and safety and environmental protection, technical standards and subscriber service requirements rules and regulations relating to subscriber privacy;

 

rules and regulations relating to payment of royalties (zero rate as of 2014);

 

 80

rules and regulations relating to universal service provision and requirements to extend the Bezeq Group’s services to areas of Israel even where it is not economically profitable to do so; and

 

regulations restricting the number of television channels DBS can own and specifying the minimum investment DBS is required to make in local content productions.

 

For additional information see “Regulatory.”

 

Build Out of Infrastructure

 

The Bezeq Group has historically made substantial investments in its fully owned infrastructure, which is one of the most technologically advanced in Israel and enables the Bezeq Group to reach customers nationwide.

 

In the domestic fixed-line communications segment, Bezeq’s NGN, which was completed in 2012, is the most advanced fixed-line communications network in Israel, offering broadband Internet bandwidth of up to 100 Mbps (download) speed, as well as innovative value-added services. In January 2013, Bezeq began laying optical FTTB and FTTH.

 

In the cellular telephony segment, Pelephone’s nationwide 3.5G UMTS/HSPA. While Pelephone substantially completed the installation of its 3.5G UMTS/HSPA+ network in 2010, it has continued to invest in the network. We believe these network features provide Pelephone with a strong platform to continue to offer a variety of advanced services and products to its customers and to capitalize on the continued increasing demand for smartphones and advanced data services, which constitute the higher value segment of the cellular telephony market.

 

In the ISP, ILD, data transfer, networks and ICT services segment, Bezeq International is currently the sole ISP in Israel that owns and operates its own high-speed submarine optical fiber communications cable system. The JONAH cable, which was launched in January 2012 provides Bezeq International with greater capacity for utilization than any other ISP in Israel. In addition, Bezeq International is able to obtain such capacity at an incremental cost, while other ISPs in Israel are required to purchase capacity and rely on one of the two other cable operators in Israel (MedNautilus and Tamares).

 

In the multi-channel pay television segment, DBS is the only licensed provider of multi-channel television broadcasts via satellite in Israel and one of only two companies in the Israeli pay television services market. While DBS relies on third party providers for the provision of satellite capacity, it owns the satellite dishes that carry the signals from such satellites to subscriber residences and set-top boxes. Such equipment and infrastructure act as a significant barrier to entry against any potential competitor in the satellite pay television market.

 

During the years ended December 31, 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2015,2016, the Bezeq Group companies invested NIS, 1.2 billion, NIS 1.3 billion, and NIS 1.6 billion and NIS 1.3 billion (approximately $414$332 million), respectively, in capital improvements, substantially all of which was invested in infrastructure and technology.

 

Macro-Economic and Political Risks

 

The Bezeq Group is subject to macro-economic and political risks that are outside of its control. For example, high levels of sovereign debt in the U.S., certain European countries and countries in the Middle East, combined with weak growth and high unemployment, could lead to fiscal reforms (including austerity measures), sovereign debt restructurings, currency instability, increased counterparty credit risk, high levels of volatility and, potentially, disruptions in the credit and equity markets, as well as other outcomes that might adversely impact the Bezeq Group. Moreover, as a business operating in Israel, we and the Bezeq Group are subject to the inherent risks associated with the political and military conditions in Israel and the potential for armed conflicts with Israel’s neighbors. Further, while the majority of the Bezeq Group’s revenues are in NIS, a portion of the Bezeq Group’s operational expenses are in U.S. dollars. The exchange rate between U.S. dollars and NIS has been volatile in the past and may continue to be so in the future. Although we attempt to mitigate currency rate risk through hedging, sharp changes in the exchange rate could have a material effect on our results of operations.

 

70

Churn

 

The fixed-line telephony, fixed-line broadband Internet infrastructure access, cellular telephony and multi-channel pay television industries typically exhibit churn as a result of high levels of competition. Churn levels may be affected by changes in our or our competitors’ pricing, our level of customer satisfaction, disconnection of non-paying subscribers and changes in regulations. Increases in churn may lead to increased costs and reduced revenues. In recent years our churn rates increased, particularly in our cellular telephony segment as new competitors entered the market and advantageous billing plans were introduced. Similarly, competition has increased in recent years as a result of the prohibition on exit fees, long-term commitments and as of January 2013, linkage of the price and terms of handsets sales to cellular telephony service prices and benefits.

81

 

Seasonality

 

Bezeq’s consolidated operating results are generally not characterized by a seasonal pattern. In general, Bezeq’s revenues from its cellular phone services are slightly higher in the second and third quarters of the fiscal year than the first and fourth quarters due to different usage patterns prevailing in the summer months compared to the winter months and the holiday season in Israel. In general, Bezeq’s revenues from international communications, Internet and NEP services are affected in a minor way by the seasons and holidays. For example, voice services for the business sector decrease in August and during the Passover holiday; voice services for the private sector increase in the summer months and towards the end of the calendar year; sales of Internet services and NEP equipment usually increase in the fourth quarter; and Internet services for the business sector decrease in the summer months due to the closure of educational institutions.

 

Impact of Currency Fluctuations and Inflation

 

Although the majority of our revenues and expenses are denominated in NIS, we are subject to risks caused by fluctuations in the exchange rate between the NIS and the U.S. dollar.

 

During 2015,2016, the U.S. dollar strengtheneddepreciated against the NIS by 0.3%1.5%. A depreciationdevaluation of the NISdollar in relation to the U.S. dollarNIS has the effect of reducing the U.S. dollarNIS value of any of our expenses or liabilities which are payable in NIS,dollars, unless those expenses or payablesliabilities are denominated in or linked to the dollar. This depreciationdevaluation of the dollar also has the effect of decreasing the U.S. dollarNIS value of any asset which consists of NISdollars or receivables payable in NIS,dollars, unless the receivables are denominated in or linked to the dollar.

From time to time we use derivative financial instruments, such as Cross Currency Swap contracts, to hedge certain of our risks associated with foreign currency fluctuations. These derivative financial instruments are carried at fair value.

Because exchange rates between the NIS and the U.S. dollar fluctuate continuously, exchange rate fluctuations, particularly larger periodic depreciations, may have an impact on our profitability and period-to- period comparisons of our results in U.S. dollars. We cannot assure you that in the future our results of operations may not be materially adversely affected by currency fluctuations. We recommend comparing our results between periods based on our NIS reports.

 

Effective Corporate Tax Rate

 

Israeli companies arewere generally subject to incomecorporate tax on their taxable income. The applicableat a rate of 25% in 2016. In December 2016, the Israeli companyParliament approved a measure whereby the corporate tax rate will be reduced in two stages from 25% to 23%, starting with a corporate income tax rate was 25%of 24% beginning in 2012 and 2013. In 2014 and 2015, our applicable income tax rate increasedJanuary 2017 which is to 26.5% and commencingbe reduced to 23% beginning in January 1, 2016 was set at 25%.2018.

 

As of December 31, 2015,2016, we had tax loss carryforwards in the amount of NIS 299172 million (approximately $77$45 million) and no capital lossesloss carry forward in the amount of NIS 33 million (approximately $8 million).forwards. Under current Israeli tax laws, tax loss carryforwards do not expire and may be offset against future taxable income.

 

Conditions in Israel

 

We are organized in, based in and derive substantially all of our revenues from markets within the State of Israel. See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Operations of the Bezeq Group and Our Company in Israel” for a description of governmental, economic, fiscal, monetary or political polices or factors that have materially affected or could materially affect our operations.

 

Trade Relations

 

Israel is a member of the United Nations, the International Monetary Fund, the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, the International Finance Corporation and the World Trade Organization. In addition, Israel is a signatory to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, which provides for reciprocal lowering of trade barriers among its member and has been granted preferences under the Generalized System of Preferences from the United States, Australia, Canada and Japan. These preferences allow Israel to export products covered by such programs either duty-free or at reduced tariffs.

 

71

Israel and the European Union Community concluded a Free Trade Agreement in July 1975, which confers certain advantages with respect to Israeli exports to most European countries and obligates Israel to lower its tariffs with respect to imports from these countries over a number of years. In 1985, Israel and the United States entered into an agreement to establish a Free Trade Area. The Free Trade Area has eliminated all tariff and specified non-tariff barriers on most trade between the two countries. On January 1, 1993, an agreement between Israel and the European Free Trade Association, known as EFTA, established a free-trade zone between Israel and the EFTA nations. In November 1995, Israel entered into a new agreement with the European Union, which included a refinement of rules of origin and other improvements, including providing for Israel to become a member of the research and technology programs of the European Union. In recent years, Israel has established commercial and trade relations with a number of other nations, including China, India, Russia, Turkey and other nations in Eastern Europe and Asia.

 

82

On May 10, 2010, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, or OECD, invited Israel to become a member of the organization, whose mission is to promote co-operation between its members while keeping high international economic standards. On September 7, 2010, on signing the OECD Convention, Israel pledged its full dedication to achieving the Organization’s fundamental aims. Israel was the 32nd country to join the organization, along with Estonia and Slovenia.

 

Explanation of Key Income Statement Items

 

Revenue.Revenue from Bezeq’s domestic fixed-line communications segment is derived primarily from fees received for (i) fixed-line telephony services, primarily including the basic fixed-line telephony service on the domestic telephone line, plus associated services such as voice mail, caller ID, call waiting, call forwarding, speed dial, conference calls, public telephones and a unified telephone directory; (ii) fixed-line broadband Internet infrastructure access services in xDSL technology; (iii) data communication services, including network services for transferring data from point to point, transferring data between computers and between various communications networks, services connecting communications networks to the Internet and remote access services; and (iv) other services including, services to communications operators, broadcasting services, contract work, IP Centrex services (lines in a virtual private exchange in a public network), data center services, a search engine for locating phone numbers (including a classified search) and new services.

 

Revenue from the Pelephone cellular telephony segment is derived primarily from fees received from its service offerings, including, voice transmission, transmission of text messages, roaming, data communications and advanced multimedia services. Pelephone also sells cellular phones, laptops and other portable devices and offers attendant repair services.

 

Bezeq International’s revenues are primarily derived from ISP services for private and business customers (including terminal equipment and support), voice services (including, ILD services to business and private customers and international call routing and termination services), hosting services, supply of international data communication solutions for business customers and ICT solutions for business customers and PBX services.

 

DBS’s revenues are primarily derived from the sale of subscriptions for its multi-channel satellite pay television broadcast services. Revenue from subscriptions is recognized ratably over the contract period, which is generally one to twelve months. DBS does not provide revenues to Bezeq.

 

Bezeq also includes a category of “Other” in its consolidated financial statements, which mainly includes revenue from customer call center services through its Bezeq Online Ltd. subsidiary, investments in a venture capital fund and ownership of Walla!, a popular Israeli provider of Internet and portal services.

 

On May 20, 2014, Walla completed the sale of all the share capital of Coral-Tell Ltd. (“Coral-Tell”), a subsidiary which operates the Yad2 website, to Axel Springer Digital Classifieds Holding GmbH, a foreign media company incorporated in Germany, for NIS 805 million. Pursuant to the sale agreement, Walla and Bezeq agreed not to engage in the areas of operation of Coral-Tell for 24 months. Bezeq recorded a pre-tax profit of NIS 582 million with respect to the sale.

 

Depreciation and Amortization. Subsequent to our acquisition of the controlling interest in Bezeq, we adopted policies regarding the depreciation and amortization expenses related to Bezeq’s communications business network equipment and capacity that were based on Bezeq’s policies. Depreciation and amortization expenses primarily consist of depreciation on computer equipment, software, leasehold improvements, capitalized software development costs and amortization of purchased intangibles. In connection with our acquisition of the controlling interest in Bezeq, we assigned fair value to fixed assets acquired in the Bezeq acquisition. The difference between the book value and the fair value of those assets was recognized as an asset in our consolidated statement of financial position. The acquired assets are depreciated and amortized according to their expected useful life. Over time such assets are fully depreciated by Bezeq, and by us respectively. As a result, the excess fair value balance we assigned to the acquired assets decreases and our related future depreciation expenses will decrease as well.

 

72

Salaries.Salaries include salary costs, social, statutory and employment benefits, and commissions of all our employees. Bezeq’s consolidated salary expenses primarily consist of operating and general and administrative salaries, benefits, stock-based compensation and incentive compensation.

 

General and Operating Expenses. Bezeq’s consolidated general and operating expenses primarily consist of cellular telephone expenses, general expenses including outside consulting, legal and accounting services, materials and spare parts, building maintenance, services and maintenance by sub-contractors, international communication expenses, vehicle maintenance expenses, royalties paid to the State of Israel and collection fees.

 

83

Other operating expenses. Other operating expenses primarily include Bezeq’s provision for severance pay on early retirement, capital gains from the sale of property, plant and equipment, provisions for contingent liabilities and income or losses from copper forward contracts.

 

Finance Expenses. Our finance expenses primarily include interest expenses, U.S. dollar exchange rate differences and CPI linkage expenses on our recently redeemed Senior Secured Notes, bank and institutional loans and debentures. In addition our finance expenses also include interest and exchange rate differences on other financial liabilities and changes in fair value of financial assets or liabilities measured at fair value through profit or loss. Bezeq’s financing expenses primarily consist of interest expenses for its financial liabilities, linkage and exchange rate differences, changes in fair value of financial assets measured at fair value through profit or loss, financing expenses for employee benefits and other financing expenses.

 

Income Tax. Income tax expense is comprised of current and deferred tax. Bezeq recognizes current and deferred tax expense in profit or loss except to the extent that it relates to items recognized directly in equity or in other comprehensive income. Current tax is the expected tax payable on the taxable income for the year, using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date, and any adjustment to tax payable in respect of previous years. Our assessment considers that deferred tax is recognized using the statements of financial position method, providing for temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for taxation purposes. Under our assessment, deferred tax is measured at the tax rates that are expected to be applied to temporary differences when they reverse, based on the laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the reporting date. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset if there is a legally enforceable right to offset current tax liabilities and assets, and they relate to income taxes levied by the same tax authority on the same taxable entity, or on different tax entities, but they intend to settle current tax liabilities and assets on a net basis or their tax assets and liabilities will be realized simultaneously. A deferred tax asset is recognized to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profits will be available against which the temporary difference can be utilized. Deferred tax assets are reviewed at each reporting date and are reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that the related tax benefit will be realized.

 

The applicable Israeli company income tax rate was 25% in 2012 and 2013. In 2014 and 2015, our applicable income tax rate increased to 26.5% and commencing January 1, 2016 it was reduced to 25%., and will be further reduced in two stages from 25% to 23%, starting with a corporate income tax rate of 24% beginning in January 2017 which is to be reduced to 23% beginning in January 2018.

 

Results of Operations

 

The following table sets forth our consolidated results of operations in NIS in millions and as a percentage of revenues for the three years ended December 31, 2015:2016:

 

 Year ended December 31,  Year ended December 31, 
 2013 2014 2015  2014 2015 2016 
 NIS  %  NIS  %  NIS  %  NIS  %  NIS  %  NIS  % 
Revenues  9,563   100%  9,055   100%  9,985   100%  9,055   100%  9,985   100%  10,084   100%
Depreciation and amortization  2,014   21%  1,873   21%  2,131   21%  1,873   21%  2,131   21%  2,161   21%
Salaries  1,873   20%  1,770   20%  1,958   20%  1,770   20%  1,958   20%  2,015   20%
General and operating expenses  3,584   37%  3,368   37%  3,876   39%  3,368   37%  3,876   39%  4,021   40%
Other operating expenses  57   1%  (535)  (6)%  3   -%  (535)  (6)%  3   -%  21   -%
Operating income  2,035   21%  2,579   29%  2,017   20%
Operating profit  2,579   29%  2,017   20%  1,866   19%
Finance expense  843   9%  1,236   14%  689   7%  1,236   14%  689   7%  1,054   11%
Finance income  (523)  (6)%  (625)  (7)%  (154)  (2)%  (625)  (7)%  (154)  (2)%  (123)  (1)%
Income after financing expenses (income), net  1,715   18%  1,968   7%  1,482   15%
Profit after financing expenses (income), net  1,968   7%  1,482   15%  935   9%
Share of losses in equity-accounted investee  252   3%  170   2%  (12)  -%  170   2%  (12)  -%  5   -%
Income before income tax  1,463   15%  1,798   20%  1,494   15%
Income tax  524   5%  667   7%  358   4%
Income for the year  939   10%  1,131   13%  1,136   11%
Income (loss) attributable to owners of the company.  137   2%  (21)  -%  210   2%
Income attributable to non-controlling interest  802   8%  1,152   13%  926   9%
Income for the year  939   10%  1,131   13%  1,136   11%
Profit before income tax  1,798   20%  1,494   15%  930   9%
Income tax expenses  667   7%  358   4%  442   4%
Net profit for the year  1,131   13%  1,136   11%  488   5%
Profit (loss) attributable to owners of the company.  (21)  -%  210   2%  (236)  (2)%
Profit attributable to non-controlling interest  1,152   13%  926   9%  724   7%
Net profit for the year  1,131   13%  1,136   11%  488   5%
Basic earnings (loss) per share  4.56   --   (0.70)  --   7.04   --   (0.70)  --   7.04   --   (7.92)  -- 
Diluted earnings (loss) per share  4.50   --   (0.81)  --   6.97   --   (0.81)  --   6.97   --   (7.92)  -- 

 

As a result of the Bezeq acquisition, we assigned fair value to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed using the acquisition method. Adjustments to record the allocation of the consideration paid for assets acquired and liabilities assumed for Bezeq have not been reflected in the separate reporting of the segments because they are not being reviewed by our Chief Operating Decision Maker in order to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segments and assess their performance. Accordingly, the purchase accounting adjustments are presented under the “adjustments” column.

 

 8473 

 

 

The following three tables provide summary financial information regarding the operating results of the individual operating segments of the Group and on a consolidated basis for the three years ended December 31, 2015.2016. Amounts are in NIS in millions. Beginning March 23, 2015, Bezeq began to consolidate the operations of DBS in its consolidated financial statements.

  

NIS in Millions   
 Year ended December 31, 2015 
 Domestic
fixed–line communications
  Cellular communications  International communications and Internet services  Multi-channel television  Others  Adjustments  Consolidated  Year ended December 31, 2016 
 NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  Domestic
fixed–line communications
  Cellular communications  International communications and Internet services  Multi-channel television  Others  Adjustments  Consolidated 
                NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS 
Revenue from external entities  4,122   2,831   1,485   1,774   197   (440)  9,969   4,063   2,587   1,478   1,745   198   -   10,071 
Inter-segment revenues  285   59   93   -   24   (445)  16   320   43   70   -   20   (440)  13 
Total revenue  4,407   2,890   1,578   1,774   221   (885)  9,985   4,383   2,630   1,548   1,745   218   (440)  10,084 
Depreciation and amortization  725   419   132   322   13   520   2,131   717   380   137   296   16   615   2,161 
Segment results - operating income  2,148   157   240   250   (15)  (763)  2,017   2,076   32   176   264   (34)  (648)  1,866 
Finance income  30   53   7   32   17   15   154   30   52   5   13   4   19   123 
Finance expenses  (362)  (4)  (15)  (635)  (2)  329   (689)  (475)  (6)  (15)  (539)  (2)  (17)  (1,054)
Total finance income (expense), net  (332)  49   (8)  (603)  15   344   (535)
Total financing income (expense), net  (445)  46   (10)  (526)  2   2   (931)
Segment profit (loss) after finance expenses, net  1,816   206   232   (353)  -   (419)  1,482   1,631   78   166   (262)  (32)  (646)  935 
Share in profit (loss) of equity-accounted investee  -   -   -   -   (2)  14   12   -   -   1   -   (5)  (1)  (5)
Segment profit (loss) before income tax  1,816   206   232   (353)  (2)  (405)  1,494   1,631   78   167   (262)  (37)  (647)  930 
Income tax  492   55   60   1   -   (250)  358   399   17   42   (330)  -   314   442 
Segment results - net profit (loss)  1,324   151   172   (354)  (2)  (155)  1,136   1,232   61   125   68   (37)  (961)  488 
Additional information:                                                        
Segment assets  7,311   3,269   1,160   1,667   659   4,965   19,031   7,111   3,294   1,177   2,026   193   3,260   17,061 
Goodwill  -   -   6   -   10   3,050   3,066   -   -   6   -   10   3,050   3,066 
Investment in equity-accounted investee  -   -   4   -   7   14   25   -   -   5   -   1   12   18 
Segment liabilities  12,117   513   343   6,685   104   (1,031)  18,731   11,988   569   380   1,434   104   2,369   16,844 
Investments in property, plant and equipment and intangible assets  837   419   127   281   33   (80)  1,617   828   277   126   227   13   -   1,471 

 

 8574

  Year ended December 31, 2015 
  Domestic
fixed–line communications
  Cellular communications  International communications and Internet services  Multi-channel television  Others  Adjustments  Consolidated 
  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS 
Revenue from external entities  4,122   2,831   1,485   1,774   197   (440)  9,969 
Inter-segment revenues  285   59   93   -   24   (445)  16 
Total revenue  4,407   2,890   1,578   1,774   221   (885)  9,985 
Depreciation and amortization  725   419   132   322   13   520   2,131 
Segment results - operating income  2,148   157   240   250   (15)  (763)  2,017 
Finance income  30   53   7   32   17   15   154 
Finance expenses  (362)  (4)  (15)  (635)  (2)  329   (689)
Total financing income (expense), net  (332)  49   (8)  (603)  15   344   (535)
Segment profit (loss) after finance expenses, net  1,816   206   232   (353)  -   (419)  1,482 
Share in profit (loss) of equity-accounted investee  -   -   -   -   (2)  14   12 
Segment profit (loss) before income tax  1,816   206   232   (353)  (2)  (405)  1,494 
Income tax  492   55   60   1   -   (250)  358 
Segment results - net profit (loss)  1,324   151   172   (354)  (2)  (155)  1,136 
Additional information:                            
Segment assets  7,311   3,269   1,160   1,667   659   4,965   19,031 
Goodwill  -   -   6   -   10   3,050��  3,066 
Investment in equity-accounted investee  -   -   4   -   7   14   25 
Segment liabilities  12,117   513   343   6,685   104   (1,031)  18,731 
Investments in property, plant and equipment and intangible assets  837   419   127   281   33   (80)  1,617 

75

  Year ended December 31, 2014 
  Domestic
fixed–line communications
  Cellular communications  International communications and Internet services  Multi-channel television  Others  Adjustments  Consolidated 
  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS 
Revenue from external entities  4,045   3,361   1,419   1,724   209   (1,724)  9,034 
Inter-segment revenues  272   58   85   -   17   (411)  21 
Total revenue  4,317   3,419   1,504   1,724   226   (2,135)  9,055 
Depreciation and amortization  688   430   130   298   23   304   1,873 
Segment results - operating income  1,980   449   232   273   629   (984)  2,579 
Finance income  285   77   9   26   11   217   625 
Finance expenses  (472)  (21)  (18)  (619)  (2)  (104)  (1,236)
Total financing income (expense), net  (187)  56   (9)  (593)  9   113   (611)
Segment profit (loss) after finance expenses, net  1,793   505   223   (320)  638   (871)  1,968 
Share in profit (loss) of equity-accounted investee  -   -   1   -   (3)  (168)  (170)
Segment profit (loss) before income tax  1,793   505   224   (320)  635   (1,039)  1,798 
Income tax  478   132   60   1   147   (151)  667 
Segment results - net profit (loss)  1,315   373   164   (321)  488   (888)  1,131 
Additional information:                            
Segment assets  8,483   3,541   1,206   1,820   682   1,765   17,498 
Goodwill  -   -   6   -   10   2,665   2,681 
Investment in equity-accounted investee  -   -   4   -   11   1,042   1,057 
Segment liabilities  12,369   696   392   6,484   107   (2,400)  17,648 
Investments in property, plant and equipment and intangible assets  835   339   110   332   17   (332)  1,301 

76 

 

 

NIS in Millions Year ended December 31, 2014 
  Domestic
fixed–line communications
  Cellular communications  International communications and Internet services  Multi-channel television  Others  Adjustments  Consolidated 
  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS 
Revenue from external entities  4,045   3,361   1,419   1,724   209   (1,724)  9,034 
Inter-segment revenues  272   58   85   -   17   (411)  21 
Total revenue  4,317   3,419   1,504   1,724   226   (2,135)  9,055 
Depreciation and amortization  688   430   130   298   23   304   1,873 
Segment results - operating income  1,980   449   232   273   629   (984)  2,579 
Finance income  285   77   9   26   11   217   625 
Finance expenses  (472)  (21)  (18)  (619)  (2)  (104)  (1,236)
Total finance income (expense), net  (187)  56   (9)  (593)  9   113   (611)
Segment profit (loss) after finance expenses, net  1,793   505   223   (320)  638   (871)  1,968 
Share in profit (loss) of equity-accounted investee  -   -   1   -   (3)  (168)  (170)
Segment profit (loss) before income tax  1,793   505   224   (320)  635   (1,039)  1,798 
Income tax  478   132   60   1   147   (151)  667 
Segment results - net profit (loss)  1,315   373   164   (321)  488   (888)  1,131 
Additional information:                            
Segment assets  8,483   3,541   1,206   1,820   682   1,765   17,498 
Goodwill  -   -   6   -   10   2,665   2,681 
Investment in equity-accounted investee  -   -   4   -   11   1,042   1,057 
Segment liabilities  12,369   696   392   6,484   107   (2,400)  17,648 
Investments in property, plant and equipment and intangible assets  835   339   110   332   17   (332)  1,301 

Year Ended December 31, 2016 Compared with Year Ended December 31, 2015

 

Revenues. Our revenues increased by 1.0% to NIS 10.1 billion (approximately $2.6 billion) in the year ended December 31, 2016 from NIS 10.0 billion in the year ended December 31, 2015. For both periods, our consolidated revenues consisted entirely of Bezeq’s consolidated revenues. The increase in revenues in 2016 was primarily due to the consolidation of DBS's revenues for a full year (consolidation began in the second quarter of 2015). Revenues declined across the Bezeq Group's main segments, primarily in the Cellular Communications segment.

Bezeq’s revenues decreased by 0.5% to NIS 4.38 billion (approximately $1.14 billion) in the year ended December 31, 2016 from NIS 4.41 billion in the year ended December 31, 2015. The decrease in the segment’s revenues was primarily due to a NIS 96 million (approximately $25 million), or 6.1%, decrease in telephony services revenues as a result of a reduction of 3.3% in average revenue per line in 2016 as well as a decrease of 2.8% in the number of access lines. The decrease in revenues was partially offset by a NIS 55 million (approximately $14 million), or 3.6%, increase in broadband Internet revenues as a result of continued growth in the number of wholesale Internet lines, which increased by 133,000 during 2016, partially offset by a decrease in the number of retail Internet lines and by a NIS 19 million (approximately $5 million), or 1.8%, increase in transmission and data revenues. The increase in revenues from transmission and data communication services resulted from growth in the number of business customers and data lines as well as the expansion of communication solutions offered to customers.

Pelephone’s revenues decreased by 9.0% to NIS 2.6 billion (approximately $684 million) in the year ended December 31, 2016 from NIS 2.9 billion in the year ended December 31, 2015. Revenues from services decreased to NIS 1.8 billion (approximately $473 million), or 9.1%, in the year ended December 31, 2016 from NIS 2.0 billion in the year ended December 31, 2015. The decrease in revenues from cellular services was due to a decrease in tariffs as a result of increased competition in the cellular market as well as from the transition of government customers to new tariff plans. Revenues from repair services were also down in the year ended December 31, 2016. Revenues from the sale of terminal equipment decreased by 8.9% to NIS 812 million (approximately $211 million) in the year ended December 31, 2016 from NIS 891 million in the year ended December 31, 2015.

Bezeq International’s revenues decreased by 1.9% to NIS 1.55 billion (approximately $403 million) in the year ended December 31, 2016 from NIS 1.58 billion in the year ended December 31, 2015. The decrease in revenues was primarily due to a reduction in hubbing revenues. After excluding hubbing revenues, total revenues increased by approximately 0.5% in 2016 compared to 2015 due to the continued growth in Internet services delivered across the submarine cable infrastructure, which was partially offset by lower revenues in the international long distance call market.

DBS had revenues of NIS 1.75 billion (approximately $454 million) for the year ended December 31, 2016, while its revenues were NIS 1.33 billion for the nine months ended December 31, 2015 after its consolidation.

Depreciation and Amortization. We recorded depreciation and amortization expenses of NIS 2.2 billion (approximately $563 million) in the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to NIS 2.1 billion in the year ended December 31, 2015, an increase of approximately 1.4%. The increase was primarily due to the consolidation of DBS for a full year, which was partially offset by a reduction in depreciation expenses at Pelephone.

The Bezeq Group recorded consolidated depreciation and amortization expenses of NIS 1.74 billion (approximately $452 million) in the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to NIS 1.68 billion in the year ended December 31, 2015, an increase of 3.3%. The increase was primarily due to the consolidation of DBS for a full year, which was partially offset by a reduction in depreciation expenses at Pelephone.

Bezeq’s depreciation and amortization expenses were NIS 717 million (approximately $186 million) in the year ended December 31, 2016 compared with NIS 725 million in the year ended December 31, 2015, a decrease of 1.1%.

Pelephone’s depreciation and amortization expenses in the year ended December 31, 2016 were NIS 380 million (approximately $99 million) compared to NIS 419 million in the year ended December 31, 2015, a decrease of 9.3%.

Bezeq International’s depreciation and amortization expenses in the year ended December 31, 2016 were NIS 137 million (approximately $36 million) compared to NIS 132 million in the year ended December 31, 2015, an increase of 3.8%.

DBS’s depreciation and amortization expenses in the year ended December 31, 2016 were NIS 296 million (approximately $77 million) while its depreciation and amortization expenses were NIS 246 million for the nine months ended December 31, 2015 after its consolidation.

 8677 

 

 

NIS in Millions Year ended December 31, 2013 
  Domestic
fixed–line communications
  Cellular communications  International communications and Internet services  Multi-channel television  Others  Adjustments  Consolidated 
  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS 
                             
Revenue from external entities  4,198   3,741   1,365   1,633   241   (1,633)  9,545 
Inter-segment revenues  280   68   68   2   21   (421)  18 
Total revenue  4,478   3,809   1,433   1,635   262   (2,054)  9,563 
Depreciation and amortization  683   458   130   263   31   449   2,014 
Segment results - operating income  1,991   608   227   268   (4)  (1,055)  2,035 
Finance income  314   137   9   7   -   56   523 
Finance expenses  (534)  (46)  (23)  (654)  (6)  420   (843)
Total finance income (expense), net  (220)  91   (14)  (647)  (6)  476   (320)
Segment profit (loss) after finance expenses, net  1,771   699   213   (379)  (10)  (579)  1,715 
Share in losses of equity-accounted investee  -   -   1   -   -   (253)  (252)
Segment profit (loss) before income tax  1,771   699   214   (379)  (10)  (832)  1,463 
Income tax  408   178   56   2   5   (125)  524 
Segment results - net profit (loss)  1,363   521   158   (381)  (15)  (707)  939 
Additional information:                            
Segment assets  7,767   4,126   1,248   1,617   232   2,253   17,243 
Goodwill  -   -   6   -   87   2,732   2,825 
Investment in equity-accounted investee  -   -   3   -   14   998   1,015 
Segment liabilities  11,234   1,242   440   5,960   249   (1,954)  17,171 
Investments in property, plant and equipment and intangible assets  777   335   106   327   19   (327)  1,237 

Salaries.Salaries increased by 2.9% to NIS 2.02 billion (approximately $524 million) in the year ended December 31, 2016 from NIS 1.96 billion in the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase was primarily due to the consolidation of DBS starting in the second quarter of 2015.

Bezeq’s salary expenses decreased by 1.5% to NIS 898 million (approximately $234 million) in the year ended December 31, 2016 from NIS 912 million in the year ended December 31, 2015. The decrease was due to a reduction in the workforce and an increase in salaries attributed for investment, offset by salary increases.

Pelephone’s salary expenses decreased 0.8% to NIS 378 million (approximately $98 million) in the year ended December 31, 2016 from NIS 381 million in the year ended December 31, 2015.

Bezeq International’s salary expenses increased 8.9% to NIS 330 million (approximately $86 million) in the year ended December 31, 2016 from NIS 303 million in the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase was mainly due to salary updates after signing the collective agreement in the first quarter of 2016.

DBS’s salary expenses in the year ended December 31, 2016 were NIS 249 million (approximately $65 million) while its salary expenses were NIS 201 million for the nine months ended December 31, 2015 after its consolidation.

General and Operating Expenses. General and operating expenses increased by 3.7% to NIS 4.02 billion (approximately $1.04 billion) in the year ended December 31, 2016 from NIS 3.88 billion in the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase was primarily due to the consolidation of DBS beginning in the second quarter of 2015, partially offset by a decrease in expenses in most of the Bezeq Group segments and primarily at Pelephone.

Bezeq’s general and operating expenses decreased by 2.2% to NIS 705 million (approximately $183 million) in the year ended December 31, 2016 from NIS 721 million in the year ended December 31, 2015. The decrease in operating expenses in 2016 was primarily due to a reduction in interconnect payments to telecom operators as well as lower building maintenance expenses partially offset by an increase in subcontractor expenses.

Pelephone’s general and operating expenses decreased by 4.6% to NIS 1.8 billion (approximately $478 million) in the year ended December 31, 2016 from NIS 1.9 billion in the year ended December 31, 2015. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in the cost of handset sales, mirroring the change in the sales mix. The decrease was also attributable to a reduction in engineering expenses, call completion fee expenses, and expenses for doubtful debts. This decrease in expenses was partially offset by an increase in frequency leasing fees following the acquisition of new 4G LTE frequencies.

Bezeq International’s general and operating expenses decreased by 1.8% to NIS 887 million (approximately $231 million) in the year ended December 31, 2016 from NIS 903 million in the year ended December 31, 2015. The decrease was primarily due to a reduction in the cost of call transfers between global operators and international call expenses, offset by higher Internet service costs driven by growth in the subscriber base and increased demand for high bandwidth rates, corresponding to revenues.

DBS’s general and operating expenses in the year ended December 31, 2016 were NIS 92 million (approximately $24 million) while its general and operating expenses were NIS 70 million for the nine months ended December 31, 2015 after its consolidation.

Other Operating Expenses, net. We had other operating expense, net of NIS 21 million in the year ended December 31, 2016 compared with other operating income, net of NIS 3 million in the year ended December 31, 2015. The decrease was primarily due to a reduction in capital gains from the sale of real estate at Bezeq Fixed-Line.

Finance expenses, net. Our consolidated net finance expenses increased by 74% to NIS 931 million (approximately $242 million) in the year ended December 31, 2016 from NIS 535 million in the year ended December 31, 2015.

Our unconsolidated net finance expenses increased by 65.7% to NIS 484 million (approximately $126 million) in the year ended December 31, 2016 from NIS 293 million in the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase was primarily attributable to one-time refinancing expenses related to the early redemption of our 7⅜% Senior Secured Notes due 2021.

The Bezeq Group’s net finance expenses increased by 70% to NIS 447 million (approximately $116 million) in the year ended December 31, 2016 from NIS 263 million in the year ended December 31, 2015. Net finance expenses of the Bezeq Group included a change in a liability on a contingent consideration following the DBS business combination in the amount of NIS 55 million. Finance expenses in 2015 reflect a reduction in a provision for interest on previous years' taxes in the amount of NIS 76 million following an agreement that was reached with the tax assessor relating to the Domestic Fixed-Line Communications segment.

 

 8778 

 

Income Tax. Consolidated income tax expenses increased by 23.5% to NIS 442 million (approximately $115 million) in the year ended December 31, 2016 from NIS 358 million in the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase in income tax expenses was primarily due to the decrease in deferred tax assets following a reduction in the corporate tax rate from 2017 and on.

Bezeq’s consolidated income tax expenses in the year ended December 31, 2016 represented 33.4% of its pre-tax profit, compared to 25.9% in the year ended December 31, 2015.

Profit (Loss) Attributable to the Owners of Our Company. Loss attributable to the owners of our company amounted to NIS 236 million (approximately $61 million) in the year ended December 31, 2016 compared with net profit of NIS 210 million in the year ended December 31, 2015. The loss is primarily attributable to the one-time refinancing expenses related to the early redemption of our 7⅜% Senior Secured Notes.

Profit Attributable to Our Non-Controlling Interests. Profit attributable to our non-controlling interests decreased to NIS 724 million (approximately $188 million) in the year ended December 31, 2016 from NIS 926 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The decrease is primarily attributable to the decrease in the Bezeq Group’s net profit in 2016 compared with 2015.

  

Year Ended December 31, 2015 Compared with Year Ended December 31, 2014

 

Revenues. Our revenues increased by 10.3% to NIS 10.0 billion (approximately $2.59 billion) in the year ended December 31, 2015 from NIS 9.1 billion in the year ended December 31, 2014. For both periods, our consolidated revenues consisted entirely of Bezeq’s consolidated revenues. The increase in revenues in 2015 was primarily due to the consolidation of DBSDBS’s revenues of NIS 1.33 billion (approximately $342 million) as ofbeginning in the second quarter of 2015. The increase in revenues is also attributable to the NIS 90 million, (approximately $23 million), or 1%, increase in revenues of the Domestic-Fixed Line segment and the NIS 74 million, (approximately $19 million), or 1%, increase in revenues of the International Communications and Internet Services segment. The increase in revenues was partially offset by the NIS 529 million, (approximately $136 million), or 5%, decrease in revenues of the Cellular Communications segment, which resulted from the continuing intense competition in the cellular market in 2015.

 

Bezeq’s revenues in the year ended December 31, 2015 increased to NIS 4.4 billion (approximately $1.1 billion) from NIS 4.3 billion in the year ended December 31, 2014, an increase of 2.1%. The increase in the segment’s revenues was primarily due to a NIS 148 million, (approximately $38 million), or 10.6%, increase in Internet services revenues as a result of an increase in the number of Internet subscribers (including wholesale service subscribers) and higher retail ARPU. The increase in revenues was partially offset by a NIS 82 million, (approximately $21 million), or 4.9%, decrease in telephony revenues as a result of a decrease in the average revenue per line, or ARPL, and the decrease in the number of access lines.

 

Pelephone’s revenues in the year ended December 31, 2015 decreased to NIS 2.9 billion (approximately $741 million) from NIS 3.4 billion in the year ended December 31, 2014, a decrease of 15.5%. Revenues from services in the year ended December 31, 2015 decreased to NIS 2.0 billion (approximately $512 million) from NIS 2.45 billion in the year ended December 31, 2014, a decrease of 18.5%. The decrease was due to a NIS 211 million (approximately $54 million) reduction in hosting service revenues, following termination of Pelephone’s contract with HOT Mobile in December 2014. Revenues were also impacted by lower rates resulting from increased market competition and the migration of existing customers to cheaper rate plans, both of which factors lowered ARPU. Revenues from repair services were also down in the year ended December 31, 2015. Revenues from the sale of terminal equipment in the year ended December 31, 2015 decreased to NIS 891 million (approximately $228 million) from NIS 966 million in the year ended December 31, 2014, a decrease of 7.8%. The decrease is primarily attributable to a reduction in terminal equipment sales, partially offset by higher selling prices. Revenues from repair services were also down in the year ended December 31, 2015.

 

88

Bezeq International’s revenues in the year ended December 31, 2015 increased to NIS 1.6 billion (approximately $404 million) from NIS 1.5 billion in the year ended December 31, 2014, an increase of 4.9%. The increase in revenues is primarily attributable to higher revenues from enterprise communication solutions (ICT), higher Internet service revenues due to the growth in the number of subscribers and an increase in revenues from data communication services. The increase was partially offset by lower revenues from outgoing calls, following a decrease in the number of minutes caused by ongoing competition with cellular providers and increased use of substitute software products.

 

Depreciation and Amortization. We recorded depreciation and amortization expenses of NIS 2.1 billion (approximately $546 million) in the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to NIS 1.9 billion in the year ended December 31, 2014, an increase of approximately 13.8%. The increase was primarily due to the consolidation of DBS’s depreciation and amortization expenses as ofbeginning in the second quarter of 2015 of NIS 245 million (approximately $63 million) along with amortization of purchase price allocation costs Bezeq incurred while acquiring control over DBS. The increase was partially offset by a decrease in depreciation and amortization expenses arising from the purchase price allocation relating to our purchase of the controlling interest in Bezeq to NIS 447 million (approximately $115 million) during the year ended December 31, 2015 compared with NIS 593 million in the year ended December 31, 2014.

 

79

The Bezeq Group recorded consolidated depreciation and amortization expenses of NIS 1.7 billion (approximately $432 million) in the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to NIS 1.3 billion in the year ended December 31, 2014, an increase of 31.5%. The increase was primarily attributable to the consolidation of the depreciation and amortization expenses of DBS beginning in the second quarter of 2015.

 

Bezeq’s depreciation and amortization expenses amounted to NIS 725 million (approximately $186 million) in the year ended December 31, 2015 compared with NIS 688 million in the year ended December 31, 2014, an increase of 5.4%.

 

Pelephone’s depreciation and amortization expenses in the year ended December 31, 2015 amounted to NIS 419 million (approximately $107 million) compared to NIS 430 million in the year ended December 31, 2014, a decrease of 2.6%.

 

Bezeq International’s depreciation and amortization expenses in the year ended December 31, 2015 amounted to NIS 132 million (approximately $34 million) compared to NIS 130 million in the year ended December 31, 2014, an increase of 1.5%.

 

Salaries.Salaries increased by 10.6% to NIS 2.0 billion (approximately $502 million) in the year ended December 31, 2015 from NIS 1.8 billion in the year ended December 31, 2014, primarily due to the consolidation of DBS salaries as of the second quarter of 2015.

  

Bezeq’s salary expenses increased by 1.9% to NIS 912 million (approximately $234 million) in the year ended December 31, 2015 from NIS 895 million in the year ended December 31, 2014. The increase in salary expenses was primarily attributable to increased salaries and related costs and was offset by employee retirements.

 

Pelephone’s salary expenses decreased 8.6% to NIS 381 million (approximately $98 million) in the year ended December 31, 2015 from NIS 417 million in the year ended December 31, 2014. The decrease in salary expenses is primarily attributable to a decrease in the number of employees.

 

Bezeq International’s salary expenses increased 1.7% to NIS 303 million (approximately $78 million) in the year ended December 31, 2015 from NIS 298 million in the year ended December 31, 2014. The increase in salary expenses was primarily attributable to an increase in the number of employees providing outsourcing services in ICT operations.

 

General and Operating Expenses. General and operating expenses increased 15.1% to NIS 3.9 billion (approximately $994 million) in the year ended December 31, 2015 from NIS 3.4 billion in the year ended December 31, 2014. The increase was primarily attributable to the consolidation of DBS’s general and operating expenses as of the second quarter of 2015.

 

Bezeq’s general and operating expenses decreased by 7.2% to NIS 721 million (approximately $185 million) in the year ended December 31, 2015 from NIS 777 million in the year ended December 31, 2014. The decrease is primarily attributable to a decrease in call completion fees to telecom operators, building maintenance costs and consultancy costs.

 

Pelephone’s general and operating expenses decreased by 8.4% to NIS 1.9 billion (approximately $494 million) in the year ended December 31, 2015 from NIS 2.1 billion in the year ended December 31, 2014. The decrease was primarily attributable to: (i) reduction in sales of terminal equipment; (ii) a decrease in rental costs, content expenses, doubtful debt expenses and advertising expenses; and (iii) a decrease in repairs and extended warranties service costs following the decrease in the number of service subscribers and the number of repairs. The decrease was partially offset by an increase in frequency leasing fees following the acquisition of 4G LTE frequencies.

 

Bezeq International’s general and operating expenses increased by 7.0% to NIS 903 million (approximately $231 million) in the year ended December 31, 2015 from NIS 844 million in the year ended December 31, 2014. The increase is primarily attributable to an increase in ICT equipment costs, Internet services and data communications services, corresponding with the increase in revenues.

 

Other Operating Expenses, net. We had other operating expense, net of NIS 3 million (approximately $1 million) in the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to other operating income, net of NIS 535 million in the year ended December 31, 2014. The decrease was primarily the result of the one-time capital gain of NIS 582 million ($150 million) generated from the sale of Coral-Tell shares by Bezeq in 2014.

 

Finance expenses, net. Our consolidated finance expenses, net decreased by 12.4% to NIS 535 million (approximately $137 million) in the year ended December 31, 2015 from NIS 611 million in the year ended December 31, 2014.

 

Our finance expenses, net in the year ended December 31, 2015 decreased 42.3% to NIS 293 million (approximately $75 million) from NIS 508 million in the year ended December 31, 2014. The decrease was primarily attributable to the one-time expenses of NIS 183 million in 2014, relating to the early repayment of the loans incurred to acquire our controlling interest in Bezeq and the early redemption of all outstanding Series A Debentures.

 

89

The Bezeq Group’s consolidated finance expenses, net increased by 102.3% to NIS 263 million (approximately $67 million) in the year ended December 31, 2015 from NIS 130 million in the year ended December 31, 2014. The increase was primarily due to financing income from shareholder loans to DBS which were recorded in 2014 and were not included in the consolidated results as of April 1, 2015 due to the consolidation of DBS. Such increase was partially set off as a result of the cancellation of taxes' interest related provision owed by Bezeq for previous years. Such cancellation was executed further to the proposed agreement with the Tax Authorities. The consolidation of DBSDBS’s financing expenses beginning in the second quarter of 2015 in the amount of NIS 91 million ($23 million) was offset by the amortization of purchase price allocation costs attributed to the DBS debentures.

 

80

Income Tax. Income tax expenses decreased by 46.3% to NIS 358 million (approximately $92 million) in the year ended December 31, 2015 from NIS 667 million in the year ended December 31, 2014. The decrease was primarily attributable to the decrease in the pre-tax profit in 2015 as a result of the sale of the Coral Tell shares in 2014 and from the NIS 101 million ($26 million) income tax benefit we recorded in 2015 as a result of the sale of our Bezeq shares in the first quarter of 2016.2014 pre-tax profit included capital gain from Bezeq’s sale of the Coral Tell shares.

 

Bezeq’s consolidated income tax expenses in the year ended December 31, 2015 represented 25.8% of its pre-tax profit, compared to 27.9% in the year ended December 31, 2014.

 

IncomeProfit (Loss) Attributable to the Owners of Our Company. IncomeProfit attributable to the owners of our company amounted towas NIS 210 million (approximately $54 million) in the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to a loss of NIS 21 million in the year ended December 31, 2014. The increase is primarily attributable to the decrease in our net financing expenses along with the income tax benefit we recorded in 2015.

 

IncomeProfit Attributable to Our Non-Controlling Interests. IncomeProfit attributable to our non-controlling interests decreased to NIS 0.93 billion (approximately $237 million) in the year ended December 31, 2015 from NIS 1.15 billion for the year ended December 31, 2014. The decrease is primarily attributable to the decrease in the Bezeq Group’s net income in 2015 comparecompared with 2014 as a result of the one-time capital gain arising from the sale of Coral-Tell shares in 2014.

 

Year Ended December 31, 2014 Compared with Year Ended December 31, 2013

Revenues. Our revenues decreased by 5.3% to NIS 9.1 billion (approximately $2.3 billion) for the year ended December 31, 2014 from NIS 9.6 billion for the year ended December 31, 2013. For both periods, our consolidated revenues consisted entirely of Bezeq’s consolidated revenues. The decrease in revenues in 2014 was primarily due to a NIS 390 million (approximately $100 million), or 10.2%, decrease in the revenues of the cellular communications segment, driven by continued increased competition in the cellular market in 2014. To a lesser extent, the decrease in revenues is also attributable to the NIS 161 million (approximately $41 million), or 3.6%, decrease in the revenues of the fixed-line segment. The decrease was partially offset by a NIS 71 million (approximately $18 million), or 5.0%, increase in the revenues of the international communications and Internet services segment.

Bezeq’s revenues in the year ended December 31, 2014 decreased to NIS 4.3 billion (approximately $1.1 billion) compared with NIS 4.5 billion in the year ended December 31, 2013, a decrease of 3.6%. The decrease in the segment’s revenues was primarily due to a NIS 303 million (approximately $78 million), or 15.4%, reduction in telephony revenues as a result of a decrease in the average revenue per line, or ARPL, and a decrease in the number of access lines. The decrease in revenues was partially offset by a NIS 107 million (approximately $28 million), or 8.3%, increase in revenues from Internet services as a result of an increase in the number of Internet subscribers.

Pelephone’s revenues in the year ended December 31, 2014 decreased to NIS 3.4 billion (approximately $879 million) compared with NIS 3.8 billion in the year ended December 31, 2013, a decrease of 10.2%. Revenues from services in the year ended December 31, 2014 decreased to NIS 2.45 billion (approximately $631 million) compared to NIS 2.8 billion in the year ended December 31, 2013, a decrease of 12.6%. The decrease is primarily attributable to the reduction in tariffs that resulted from the continued intensified competition in the cellular market. The intensified competition led to a migration to unlimited usage plans which resulted in a decrease in ARPU, as well as to a decrease in the total number of subscribers. Revenues from the sale of terminal equipment in the year ended December 31, 2014 decreased to NIS 966 million (approximately $248 million), compared to NIS 1 billion in the year ended December 31, 2013, a decrease of 3.5%. The decrease is primarily attributable to a decrease in handset sales and prices. The decrease was partially offset by increased revenues from the sale of accessories.

Bezeq International’s revenues in the year ended December 31, 2014 increased to NIS 1.5 billion (approximately $387 million) compared with NIS 1.4 billion in the year ended December 31, 2013, an increase of 5%. The increase in revenues is primarily attributable to an increase in revenues from call transfers between communication carriers worldwide, increased revenues from enterprise communication solutions (ICT) and increased revenues from Internet operations due to an increase in the number of subscribers. The increase was partially offset by a decrease in revenues from outgoing calls attributable to the transition in the cellular market to packages that include unlimited overseas calls.

90

Depreciation and Amortization. We recorded depreciation and amortization expenses of NIS 1.9 billion (approximately $482 million) for the year ended December 31, 2014 compared to NIS 2.0 billion for the year ended December 31, 2013, a decrease of approximately 7%. The decrease was primarily due to a 15.6% decrease in depreciation and amortization arising from the purchase price allocation relating to our purchase of the controlling interest in Bezeq, to NIS 593 million (approximately $152 million) during the year ended December 31, 2014 compared with NIS 703 million during the year ended December 31, 2013. To a lesser extent, the decrease in depreciation and amortization is also attributable to the NIS 30 million (approximately $8 million), or 2.3%, decrease in the Bezeq Group depreciation and amortization that resulted from the end of depreciation of certain property, plant and equipment assets in the cellular communications and the Domestic Fixed-Line Communications segments during 2013.

The Bezeq Group recorded consolidated depreciation and amortization expenses of NIS 1.28 billion (approximately $329 million) for the year ended December 31, 2014 compared to NIS 1.3 billion for the year ended December 31, 2013, a decrease of 2.3%. The decrease is primarily attributable to lower depreciation of certain property, plant and equipment assets and subscriber acquisition costs in the cellular communications segment.

Bezeq’s depreciation and amortization expenses amounted to NIS 688 million (approximately $177 million) in the year ended December 31, 2014 compared with NIS 683 million in the year ended December 31, 2013, an increase of 0.7%.

Pelephone’s depreciation and amortization expenses in the year ended December 31, 2014 amounted to NIS 430 million (approximately $111 million) compared to NIS 458 million in the year ended December 31, 2013, a decrease of 6.1%. The decrease is primarily attributable to the conclusion of the capitalization of subscriber acquisition costs and the depreciation of other property, plant and equipment.

Bezeq International’s depreciation and amortization expenses in the year ended December 31, 2014 amounted to NIS 130 million (approximately $33 million), the same as for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Salaries.Salaries decreased 5.5% to NIS 1.8 billion (approximately $455 million) for the year ended December 31, 2014 from NIS 1.9 billion for the year ended December 31, 2013, primarily due to a decrease in the number of employees in the Cellular and Domestic Fixed-Line Communications segments.

Bezeq’s salary expenses decreased 8.7% to NIS 895 million (approximately $230 million) for the year ended December 31, 2014 from NIS 980 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. The decrease in salary expenses was primarily due to a decrease in the number of employees and in share-based compensation. The decrease was partially offset by higher employee wages during 2014.

Pelephone’s salary expenses decreased 5% to NIS 417 million (approximately $107 million) for the year ended December 31, 2014 from NIS 439 million in the year ended December 31, 2013. The decrease in salary expenses is primarily attributable to a decrease in the number of employees. The decrease was partially offset by higher employee wages during 2014.

Bezeq International’s salary expenses increased 3.8% to NIS 298 million (approximately $77 million) for the year ended December 31, 2014 from NIS 287 million in the year ended December 31, 2013. The increase in salary expenses was primarily attributable to an increase in the number of employees providing outsourcing services in ICT operations.

General and Operating Expenses. General and operating expenses decreased 6% to NIS 3.4 billion (approximately $866 billion) for the year ended December 31, 2014 from NIS 3.6 billion for the year ended December 31, 2013. The decrease was primarily attributable to the Cellular Communications and the Domestic Fixed-Line Communications segments, as a result of lower terminal equipment costs and interconnect fees.

Bezeq’s general and operating expenses decreased 13.2% to NIS 777 million (approximately $200 million) in the year ended December 31, 2014, from NIS 895 million in the year ended December 31, 2013. The decrease is primarily attributable to a decrease in interconnect fees and a reduction in terminal equipment costs following a transition from selling home network routers to rental. The decrease was also attributable to a decrease in structure maintenance costs.

Pelephone’s general and operating expenses decreased 6.2% to NIS 2.1 billion (approximately $541 million) in the year ended December 31, 2014, from NIS 2.2 billion in the year ended December 31, 2013. The decrease was mainly attributable to: (i) changes in the sales mix; (ii) a decrease in repair costs and warranty services following a decrease in the number of service subscribers and the number of repair calls; (iii) a decrease in interconnect fees following a reduction in call termination rates to domestic fixed-line communication operators; and (iv) lower content expenses together with a reduction in content revenue. The decrease was partially offset by; (i) an increase in distribution fee costs, following an increase in the number of subscribers migrating to this segment; (ii) greater expenses for doubtful accounts; (iii) a one-time reduction in net collection costs recorded in the previous year; and (iv) an increase in site rental fees (following a one-time decrease of NIS 30 million recorded last year after adjusting a liability estimate).

91

Bezeq International’s general and operating expenses increased 7% to NIS 844 million (approximately $217 million) in the year ended December 31, 2014, from NIS 789 million in the year ended December 31, 2013. The increase is primarily attributable to an increase in the cost of call transfers between communications carriers worldwide and increased expenses from enterprise communications solutions. The increase was partially offset by a decrease in expenses for outgoing calls, consistent with the decline revenues.

Other Operating Expenses, net. We had other operating income, net of NIS 535 million (approximately $138 million) in the year ended December 31, 2014 compared to other operating expenses, net of NIS 57 million in the year ended December 31, 2013. The increase was a result of the one-time pre-tax capital gain of NIS 582 million ($150 million) from the sale of Coral-Tell shares.

Finance expenses, net. Our consolidated finance expenses, net increased by 90.9% to NIS 611 million (approximately $157 million) for the year ended December 31, 2014 from NIS 320 million for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Our finance expenses, net for the year ended December 31, 2014 increased to NIS 508 million (approximately $131 million) compared with NIS 211 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, an increase of 141%. The increase is primarily attributable to one-time expenses of NIS 183 million ($47 million) relating to the early repayment of the loans incurred to acquire our controlling interest in Bezeq and the early redemption of all of the outstanding Series A Debentures that were part of our refinancing process and to net finance expenses related to the revaluation of our Cross Currency Swap hedge transactions of NIS 85 million (approximately $22 million).

The Bezeq Group’s consolidated finance expenses, net decreased 10.3% to NIS 130 million (approximately $33 million) in the year ended December 31, 2014 compared to NIS 145 million in the year ended December 31, 2013. The decrease is primarily attributable to a decrease in net finance expenses in the Domestic Fixed-Line Communications segment. The decrease was partially offset be decrease in net finance income in the cellular communications segment.

Income Tax. Income tax expenses increased by 27.3% to NIS 667 million (approximately $171 million) for the year ended December 31, 2014 from NIS 524 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. The increase was mainly attributable to an increase in the pre-tax profit as a result of the sale of the Coral Tell shares.

Bezeq’s consolidated income tax expenses in the year ended December 31, 2014 represented 27.9% of its pre-tax profit, compared to 26.9% in the year ended December 31, 2013.

Income (Loss) Attributable to the Owners of Our Company. Loss attributable to the owners of our company amounted to NIS 21 million (approximately $5 million) for the year ended December 31, 2014, compared to an income of NIS 137 million for year ended December 31, 2013. The loss attributable to the owners of our company is primarily attributable to the one-time expenses of NIS 183 million ($47 million) we incurred relating to the early repayment of the loans incurred to acquire our controlling interest in Bezeq and the early redemption of all the outstanding Series A Debentures that were part of our refinancing process and to net finance expenses related to the revaluation of our Cross Currency Swap hedge transactions of NIS 85 million (approximately $22 million).

Income Attributable to Our Non-Controlling Interests. Income attributable to our non-controlling interests increased to NIS 1.15 billion (approximately $296 million) for the year ended December 31, 2014 compared to NIS 802 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. The increase in income attributable to our non-controlling interests is primarily attributable to the one time capital gain from the sale of Coral-Tell shares together with lower depreciation and amortization expenses with respect to the purchase price allocation relating to the Bezeq transaction.

B.Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

As of December 31, 20152016 and 2014,2015, we had liquidity consisting of cash and cash equivalents, pledged accounts and marketable securitiesshort term investments on an unconsolidated basis of NIS 953435 million (approximately $244$113 million) and NIS 997953 million, respectively. In 2015,2016, we sold 4.18% of our holdings in Bezeq receiving net proceeds of NIS 978 million (approximately $254 million) and received two dividend payments from Bezeq in the amount of NIS 545379 million (approximately $140$100 million), which proceeds were mainly offset byused to reduce approximately NIS 1.0 billion (approximately $257 million) of our debt, make interest payments in the amount of NIS 276457 million (approximately $71$119 million), make dividend payments to our shareholders in the amount of NIS 127355 million (approximately $33$92 million), repurchase of our senior secured notes in the amount and make tax payments of NIS 11678 million (approximately $30 million) and tax payments in the amount of NIS 72 million (approximately $18$20 million).

92

 

From our inception in 1999 until our initial public offering in October 2007, we operated as a subsidiary of Internet Gold. From the commencement of our operations until 2003, when we began to generate positive operating cash flow, our operations were financed by Internet Gold from its financial resources. On April 14, 2010, we completed the acquisition of 30.44% of Bezeq’s outstanding shares from Ap.Sb.Ar. Holdings Ltd. for an aggregate cash purchase price ofapproximately NIS 6.5 billion and became the controlling shareholder of Bezeq. In March 2011, we acquired an additional 0.93% of Bezeq’s outstanding shares for NIS 300 million. At present, our ownership interest in Bezeq is 30.72%26.34%.

 

As part of our acquisition of the controlling interest in Bezeq, effective January 1, 2010, we sold our legacy communications business excluding certain retained indebtedness and liabilities to a wholly-owned subsidiary of Ampal-American Israel Corporation, or Ampal, for NIS 1.2 billion.

 

On March 24, 2010,the closing date of the acquisition, our indirect fully owned-subsidiary, SP2, which holds the Bezeq interest we acquired on that date, obtained a loan of NIS 4.6 billion from certain banking and financial institutions. SP2 also created liens for the lenders as security for its obligations under the loan agreement and agreed to pay the lenders certain fees, expenses and cost increases. SP2 also issued phantom stock options to the banks. On November 5, 2013, SP2, entered into an amendment which provided for improved terms.

$800 Million Note Offering

On February 19, 2014, we completed a private placementoffering to eligible purchasers of 3,478,000$800 million of our ordinary shares to Israeli institutional investors7⅜% Senior Secured Notes due 2021, or the Notes. The Notes were offered and our controlling shareholder, Internet Gold. The offering price of NIS 116 per ordinary share was determined by means of a tender by third-party institutional investors. Based on Internet Gold’s irrevocable undertaking to subscribe for approximately 75% of the offering on the same terms and conditions negotiated with the third-party institutional investors, Internet Gold purchased 2,599,310 of our ordinary shares, which represented approximately 75% of the shares sold in the private placement.United States to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to Rule 144A under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, and to certain qualifying investors in offshore transactions, including in Israel, in reliance on Regulation S under the Securities Act. The private placement proceeds from Internet Goldof the $800 million Note offering were paidused to us by repaymentrepay all of NIS 301.5 million ofthe outstanding balances under the loans we incurred to acquire our controlling interest in Bezeq.

The Notes, which were previously provided to usredeemed in October 2016, were senior obligations that were guaranteed by Internet Gold in March 2007our two subsidiaries, SP1 and November 2009,SP2, on a senior secured basis. The Notes and we repaidthe guarantees were secured by first priority liens over all of the capital stock of SP2, the capital stock of Bezeq held by SP2, which as of the date of the issuance of the Notes constituted approximately 30% of the outstanding balancevoting capital stock of NIS 31.5 million in May 2010.Bezeq, and additional collateral.

 

Existing Unsecured

81

The indenture for the Notes restricted our ability to: (i) incur additional indebtedness; (ii) use a portion of the proceeds of any dividends received from the Bezeq Group and make certain payments and investments create certain liens; (iii) impose restrictions on the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends or other payments to us; (iv) transfer or sell ownership interests in the Bezeq Group; (v) merge or consolidate with other entities; and enter into transactions with affiliates.

 

On August 13, 2013, Midroog Ltd., an Israeli rating agencyFebruary 2, 2016, we announced that our wholly-owned subsidiary, SP2, sold 115,500,000 Bezeq shares (approximately 4.18% of Bezeq’s issued and the local affiliate of Moody’s, confirmed its “A2” stable rating for our Series A Debentures. On March 20, 2014, Midroog raised the local ratingpaid-up share capital). As a result of the Series B Debenturessale, we received gross proceeds of NIS 982 million (approximately $248 million). The sale took place in accordance with the provisions of Section 3(a3) of the Communications Order. We retained a 26.34% ownership interest in Bezeq following the closing of the transaction.

According to the terms of the indenture for the Notes, the net proceeds from the sale of the Bezeq shares held were deposited into a “Lockbox Account” and were subject to certain conditions and covenants relating to asset sales and release of liens on sold assets. We were required to make an “A2”offer within 365 days of the sale of the Bezeq shares to the holders of the Notes to purchase Notes with the proceeds deposited in the lockbox account at a cash offer price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of purchase. On June 28, 2016, we announced the final results of our modified Dutch auction tender offer pursuant to a Tender Offer Memorandum dated May 26, 2016 to purchase a portion of the Notes. Approximately US$ 18.6 million in aggregate principal amount of the Notes were validly tendered.

In August 2016, we announced our intention to raise further funds to redeem our outstanding Notes through the offering of new non-convertible debentures in Israel pursuant to a shelf prospectus in Israel.  Midroog issued an “A1”Aa3.il rating with a stable outlook.outlook for the new Series C Debentures, in a scope of up to NIS 1.9 billion par value. In FebruarySeptember 2016 Midroog raisedwe completed the local ratingoffering of ourapproximately NIS 1.88 billion (approximately $489 million) par value of the Series B Debentures from A1.ilC Debentures.

We fully redeemed the Notes on October 25, 2016. Following this process, the Bezeq shares which served as collateral for the Notes and were held by SP2 became free and clear of any pledges (subject to Aa3.il, while maintaining a stable outlook.the general governmental control permit) and all of the Bezeq shares that were held by Mishmeret Trust Company Ltd., the trustee and security agent for the Notes, were transferred back to SP2.

Unsecured Notes

 

Series A Debentures. During the period from March 2007 to May 2007, we issued a total of NIS 425 million of Series A Debentures to repay the indebtedness we incurred in connection with our acquisition of 012 Golden Lines. The Series A Debentures, together with the accrued interest, are payable in eight equal payments on March 15 of each year starting from March 15, 2009 and are linked to the Israeli CPI. The Series A Debentures bear annual interest at the rate of 5.85%, which was decreased to an annual interest rate of 4.75% when they were listed for trading on the TASE.

On March 17, 2014, we completed an early redemption of all our outstanding Series A Debentures in a par value of NIS(NIS 153 million (approximately $44 million)par value) for a total consideration of NIS 203 million (approximately $58 million). As of that date our Series A Debentures were delisted from the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange.million.

 

Series B Debentures. On September 21, 2010, we issued, at par value, NIS 400 million Series B Debentures to the public in Israel. The Series B Debentures are listed for trading on the TASE. The Series B Debentures are payable in four equal annual installments on March 31 of each of the years 2016 through 2019. The Series B Debentures pay interest at a fixed annual rate of 6.5% as was set in the public tender, payable in semi-annual installments on March 31 and on September 30 of each of the years 2011 through 2019 (the first interest payment was made on March 31, 2011, and the last interest payment is payable on March 31, 2019). The Series B Debentures are NIS denominated and are not linked to the Israeli CPI. The Series B Debentures contain standard terms and conditions and are unsecured, non-convertible and do not restrict our ability to issue any new series of debt instruments or distribute dividends in the future. The net proceeds from the offering of the Series B Debentures were NIS 395.8 million.

  

In February 2016, Midroog raised the local rating of our Series B Debentures from A1.il to Aa3.il, while maintaining a stable outlook.

The indenture for the Series B Debentures provides for certain events of default which may cause the immediate repayment of such debentures, including: (i) if Eurocom Communications does not have control (directly or indirectly) over our company; (ii) if we do not have control (directly or indirectly) over, or hold the control block in, Bezeq; or (iii) if we issue additional Series B Debentures resulting in the issuance of a rating lower than A2 by Midroog Ltd. or an equivalent rating from another rating agency upon the issuance of the additional debentures.

 

In January 2012 and August 2013, we issued NIS 125.8 million and NIS 180 million, respectively, of our Series B Debentures in two private placements. The private placements were carried out as an increase to our outstanding Series B Debentures. The newly issued Series B Debentures are listed on the TASE and their terms are identical to the terms of Series B Debentures issued in September 2010. As of December 31, 2015, NIS 706 million (approximately $181 million) of our Series B Debentures were outstanding.

 

 9382 

 

 

On March 23, 2016, we announced a private placement of NIS 148 million par value of our Series B Debentures to Israeli institutional investors for an aggregate consideration of approximately NIS 162 million (approximately US $42 million). The private placement was carried out as an increase to the outstanding Series B Debentures of B Communications, which were first issued in September 2010 and have identical terms. The net proceeds of the private placement increased our unrestricted cash.

Series C Debentures. In September 2016, we announced that we received NIS 1.85 billion (approximately $489 million) of binding commitments (out of about NIS 3.0 billion of offers) from Israeli institutional investors to purchase new Series C Debentures maturing in 2024. The net proceeds from the offering were used to redeem our outstanding 7⅜% Senior Secured Notes, and further strengthened our balance sheet. In January 2017, we announced a private placement of NIS 118,000,000 par value of our Series C Debentures to Israeli institutional investors for an aggregate consideration of approximately NIS 118 million (approximately $31 million). The private placement was carried out as an increase to the outstanding Series C Debentures.

Midroog Ltd. issued an Aa3.il Rating for the Series C Debentures in September 2016.

The principal of the Series C Debentures is payable in four equal annual installments payable on November 30 of each of the years 2020 through 2023 and one installment payable on November 30, 2024. Each of the first four installments will be equal to 7.5% of the principal amount of the aggregate amount of the Series C Debentures sold and the last installment will equal to 70% of such principal amount. The annual interest rate is 3.6%. The interest on the outstanding principal of the Series C Debentures is payable in semi-annual payments on May 31 and November 30 of each year, while the first interest payment will be paid on May 31, 2017 and the last interest payment will be payable together with the last principal payment on November 30, 2024. In the tender, institutional investors committed to purchase approximately 1,850,000 units, each unit consisted of NIS 1,000 of principal amount of the Series C Debentures. The Israeli public tender for the Series C Debentures was held on September 18, 2016. We limited the acceptance of offers in the public tender to NIS 150 million (approximately $40 million), such that the total aggregate proceeds of the offering will not exceed NIS 2 billion (approximately $528 million). In total, we received a nominal value of NIS 1,882,265,000 in the public tender.

The indenture governing the Series C Debentures restricts our creating a lien in favor of any third party over our direct and/or indirect holdings of 691,361,036 ordinary shares of Bezeq, or the Bezeq Shares, including any of the rights accompanying such shares without the prior consent of the holders of the Series C Debentures. We also agreed to refrain from making any disposition of the Bezeq Shares without obtaining the prior consent of the holders of the Series C Debentures. Notwithstanding the foregoing, and subject to the provisions of applicable law and/or permit, we may sell all or a portion of the Bezeq Shares to any third party, provided that in such instance, we use the net proceeds from such sale, less taxes, expenses and deductions associated with the sale of such shares to make a full or partial early redemption of the Series Debentures.

Pursuant to the terms of the Series C Debentures indenture we may notassume additional debt, with the exception of:

financial debt that does not exceed NIS 400 million;

the financial debt is not secured by any collateral and does not have priority over the Series C Debentures upon insolvency: and

the total par value of the Series C Debentures will not exceed an aggregate of NIS 2.3 billion.

We also undertook to hold (directly and/or indirectly) at least 25% of Bezeq’s issued and paid-up capital, unless a regulatory permit/approval is received to reduce such ownership percentage. Similarly, Eurocom Communications Ltd. undertook to refrain from transferring control of our company (directly or indirectly) to a party which has not been authorized in advance by the necessary regulatory entities, to the extent such approvals are required, at the relevant time.

Pursuant to the terms of the Series C Debentures indenture, we also undertook that our equity (capital attributed to our shareholders, without non-controlling interests) will not be less than NIS 650 million for two or more consecutive calendar quarters. The indenture includes a mechanism to adjust the interest rate in the event that our equity falls NIS 650 million for two consecutive calendar quarters or in the event of a downgrade in the rating of the Series C Debentures.

83

We also undertook not to distribute a dividend to our shareholders, buyback any of ordinary shares or make any other distribution as defined in the Companies Law unless all the following conditions are satisfied:

the distribution will not cause a downgrade in the rating of the Series C Debentures;

we are not in violation of any of the covenants;

no grounds for immediate repayment exist at the time a resolution to make a distribution is adopted, and no such grounds exist as a result of such distribution;

our equity post-distribution is not less than NIS 800 million;

until full repayment of the principal of the Series C Debentures, we may not distribute a dividend exceeding 75% of the balance of our distributable surpluses (the surplus balance or surpluses accrued in the last two years, in accordance with the definitions provided in the Companies Law) in accordance with our consolidated financial statements. In addition, we may not make a distribution if we recorded an aggregate net loss in the last four quarters preceding the distribution date, on the basis of our last financial statements and/or the quarterly financial report published prior to the distribution date; and

notwithstanding the foregoing, the restrictions will not apply with respect to the balance of our profits/surpluses which are distributable in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Law as of June 30, 2016 (i.e. a total of NIS 416 million were excluded from the distribution restrictions).

The Series C Debentures indenture also requires that our equity may not be less than 15% of the total balance sheet in accordance with our audited or reviewed (unconsolidated) financial statements (or, alternatively, the quarterly financial report figures), for two or more consecutive calendar quarters.

 

Bezeq’s Dividend Distributions

 

On August 4, 2009, Bezeq’s board of directors adopted a dividend distribution policy according to which Bezeq will distribute to its shareholders, semiannually, a dividend at a rate of 100% of its semiannual net income after minority share in accordance with Bezeq’s consolidated financial statements. The implementation of the dividend policy is subject to the provisions of applicable law, including the dividend distribution tests set forth in the Israeli Companies Law, as well as the estimate of Bezeq’s board of directors regarding Bezeq’s ability to meet its existing and anticipated liabilities from time to time. Each dividend distribution is subject to the approval of Bezeq’s shareholders, pursuant to Bezeq’s articles of association.

 

On March 31, 2011, the Tel Aviv District Court approved a NIS 3 billion distribution by Bezeq to its shareholders in six equal, semi-annual payments during the period 2011 through 2013. The Court approval was required as the amount of the distribution exceeded Bezeq’s accounting profits according to its financial statements. All of the six semi-annual payments of NIS 0.5 billion were distributed to Bezeq’s shareholders.

Bezeq paid total cash dividends of NIS 2.82.1 billion, NIS 2.11.8 billion and NIS 1.81.4 billion (approximately $455$375 million) in the three years ended December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively, out of which we received NIS 876638 million, NIS 638545 million and NIS 545379 million (approximately $140$100 million), respectively.

 

Debt Incurred for Our Acquisition of the Bezeq Shares

On April 14, 2010, we completed the acquisition of 30.44% of Bezeq’s outstanding shares for approximately NIS 6.5 billion and became the controlling shareholder of Bezeq. The acquisition was funded with the proceeds that we received from the sale of our legacy communications business and loans. On the closing date of the acquisition of the Bezeq interest, our indirect fully owned-subsidiary, SP2, which holds the Bezeq interest we acquired on that date, obtained a loan of NIS 4.6 billion from certain banking and financial institutions. SP2 also created liens for the lenders as security for its obligations under the loan agreement and agreed to pay the lenders certain fees, expenses and cost increases. SP2 also issued phantom stock options to the banks. On November 5, 2013, SP2 entered into an amendment which provided for improved terms.

On March 17, 2014, we completed the early redemption of all our outstanding Series A Debentures for total consideration of NIS 203 million (approximately $52 million).

The proceeds of the February 2014 $800 million senior secured note offering were used to repay all of the outstanding balances under the loans we incurred to acquire our controlling interest in Bezeq.

$800 Million Note Offering

On February 19, 2014, we completed a private offering to eligible purchasers of $800 million of 7⅜% Senior Secured Notes due 2021, or the Notes. The Notes were offered and sold in the United States to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to Rule 144A under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and to certain qualifying investors in offshore transactions, including in Israel, in reliance on Regulation S under the Securities Act.

The Notes are senior obligations and are guaranteed by our two subsidiaries, SP1 and SP2, on a senior secured basis. The Notes and the guarantees are secured by first priority liens over all of the capital stock of SP2, the capital stock of Bezeq held by SP2, which constitute, as of the date of the issuance of the Notes, approximately 30% of the outstanding voting capital stock of Bezeq, and additional collateral.

The Notes and the guarantees are secured by security interests in the collateral described above, which collateral also secures the obligations under certain hedging obligations. In connection with the sale of the Notes, we, SP1 and SP2 entered into an intercreditor agreement, or the Intercreditor Agreement, with, among others, the Security Agent (as hereinafter defined) under the indenture for the Notes, or the Indenture, the Trustee under the Notes, and the hedging counterparties with whom we entered into hedging arrangements, or the Hedging Counterparties. Pursuant to the terms of the Intercreditor Agreement and subject to certain limitations as set forth below, any liabilities in respect of counterparties to certain hedging obligations that are permitted to be secured by Collateral will receive priority with respect to any proceeds received upon any enforcement action over, and certain distressed disposals of, any Collateral. The Intercreditor Agreement provides that a common security agent, who will also serve as the security agent for the creditors under our hedging obligations and any additional debt or other obligations secured by the collateral permitted to be incurred under the Indenture, or the Security Agent, will act as provided for in the Intercreditor Agreement, subject to the provisions of the Pledge Permit, the Israeli Communications Law and Communications Order. The Intercreditor Agreement regulates the ability of the Trustee or the holders of the Notes to instruct the Security Agent to take enforcement action.

94

Pursuant to the Communications Order issued by the Ministry of Communications in respect of Bezeq, there are legal limitations on the ability of any person (individually and together with others) directly or indirectly holding, acquiring or controlling 5% or more of the voting power or share of economic rights in Bezeq. In connection with the offering of the Notes, the Security Agent was granted a pledge permit from the Ministers, or the Pledge Permit, which enables us to pledge the pledged Bezeq Shares and pledged SP2 Shares as collateral for the Notes and certain hedging obligations. However, pursuant to the Communications Order and the Pledge Permit, no person (individually and acting in concert with other persons) may directly or indirectly hold, acquire or control, at any given time, more than 10% of the outstanding principal amount of Notes without first obtaining a permit from the Ministers.

The indenture for the Notes, or the Indenture, among other things, restricts our ability to: (i) incur additional indebtedness; (ii) use a portion of the proceeds of any dividends received from the Bezeq Group and make certain payments and investments create certain liens; (iii) impose restrictions on the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends or other payments to us; (iv) transfer or sell ownership interests in the Bezeq Group; (v) merge or consolidate with other entities; and enter into transactions with affiliates.

Prior to February 15, 2017 we will be entitled to redeem all or a portion of the Notes at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Notes plus the applicable “make-whole” premium and accrued and unpaid interest and additional amounts, if any, to the redemption date. On or after February 15, 2017, we will be entitled to redeem all or a portion of the Notes at certain redemption prices plus accrued and unpaid interest and additional amounts, if any, to the redemption date. Prior to February 15, 2017, we will be entitled on one or more occasions to redeem the Notes in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed 40% of the aggregate principal amount of the Notes with the net cash proceeds from certain equity offerings at a redemption price equal to 107.375% of the principal amount outstanding in respect of the Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest and additional amounts, if any, to the redemption date, so long as at least 60% of the aggregate principal amount of the Notes remains outstanding immediately after each such redemption and each such redemption occurs within 90 days after the date of the relevant equity offering.

In the event of certain developments affecting taxation (with respect to the Notes), we may redeem all, but not less than all, of the Notes at 100% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest and additional amounts, if any, to the redemption date. In the event of certain developments affecting regulations applicable to us with respect to the ownership of the Bezeq Group, we may redeem all, but not less than all, of the Notes at 101% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption. Upon the occurrence of certain events constituting a “change of control,” we will be required to offer to repurchase all outstanding Notes at a purchase price in cash equal to 101% of the principal amount thereof on the date of purchase plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of purchase.

Following the note issuance we entered into five Cross Currency Swap, or CCS, transactions in order to hedge our exposure to fluctuations in the U.S. dollar exchange rate. The CCS transactions hedge a total of $725 million par value of the Notes.

On February 2, 2016, we announced that our wholly-owned subsidiary, SP2, sold 115,500,000 Bezeq shares (approximately 4.18% of Bezeq’s issued and paid-up share capital). As a result of the sale, we received gross proceeds of NIS 982 million (approximately $248 million).

The sale took place in accordance with the provisions of Section 3(a3) of the Communications Order, by way of an agreement to sell the shares through a “distribution agent” (as this term is defined in the Communications Order), which entered into agreement with third parties to sell them the shares in off-the-floor transactions. In connection with this sale, the shares were released from a pledge that had been imposed on them in favor of debenture holders (USD Series 144A) that were issued by us as well as various hedge funds with which we entered into agreements in connection with the aforementioned debentures. After completing the sale process, we hold 26.34% of Bezeq’s issued and paid-up share capital.

According to the terms of the Indenture, the net proceeds from the sale of any Bezeq shares held by us must be deposited into our “Lockbox Account” and are subject to other customary conditions and covenants relating to asset sales and release of liens on sold assets. In addition, according to the terms of the Indenture, we must make an offer within 365 days to the holders of the notes to purchase notes with the proceeds deposited in the lockbox account at a cash offer price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of purchase.

95

Dividend Distributions

 

Following the execution of the refinancing agreement, ourOur Board of Directors declared our first dividend as a public company on November 7, 2013, a dividend of NIS 3.41 per share and NIS 102 million in the aggregate. The record date for the distribution of the dividend was November 18, 2013 and the payment date was December 3, 2013. Dividend amounts paid in U.S. dollars were converted from NIS based upon the representative rate of exchange published by the Bank of Israel on November 18, 2013. Tax was withheld at a rate of up to 25%.

On May 21, 2015, our Board of Directors declared a dividend of NIS 2.24 per share (approximately $0.58 cents) and approximately NIS 67 million (approximately $17 million) in the aggregate. Dividend amounts paid in U.S. dollars were converted from NIS based on the representative rate of exchange published by the Bank of Israel on June 1, 2015. The record date for the distribution of the dividend was June 2, 2015 and the payment date was June 16, 2015.

On August 31, 2015, our Board of Directors declared a dividend of NIS 0.73 per share (approximately $0.19) and approximately NIS 22 million (approximately $6 million) in the aggregate. Dividend amounts paid in U.S. dollars were converted from NIS based upon the representative rate of exchange published by the Bank of Israel on September 16, 2015. The record date for the distribution of the dividend was September 16, 2015 and the payment date was September 29, 2015.

On November 19, 2015, our Board of Directors declared a dividend of NIS 38 million, ($10or NIS 1.27 per share. On May 25, 2016, our Board of Directors declared a dividend of NIS 355 million (approximately $92 million), or NIS 1.27 ($0.32)11.88 per share. Dividend amounts paid in U.S. dollars were converted from NIS based upon the representative rate of exchange published by the Bank of Israel on December 10, 2015. The record date for the distribution of the dividend was December 10, 2015 and the payment date was December 23, 2015.share (approximately $3.09).

 

Financing of Ongoing Operations

As of December 31, 2016, our liquidity balance consisted of cash equivalents, pledged accounts and short term investments and short term investments on an unconsolidated basis totaled NIS 435 million (approximately $113 million). Following the sale of our Bezeq shares in February 2016 and the refinancing we completed in September 2016, we own approximately 37 million Bezeq ordinary shares that are free from any encumbrances. These shares can, if necessary, be used as collateral to refinance old debt or may be sold for cash.

 

We expect to have sufficient funds to meet our working capital needs, capital expenditures, debt service and other funding requirements for the next twelve months, both on a consolidated level (including Bezeq) and with respect to our own debt service (not including the Bezeq Group).

 

We expect to have sufficient funds to service our indebtedness (excluding the Bezeq Group’s indebtedness) from our current cash, cash equivalents and short term investments,liquidity, as well from future dividends from Bezeq, whose dividend policy is to distribute all of the net profits attributable to its shareholders as dividends.

 

In the year ended December 31, 2015,2016, we received dividends from Bezeq totaling NIS 545379 million (approximately $140$100 million) and made total interest payments of NIS 273457 million (approximately $71$119 million) on the Notes and our Series B Debentures.

 

84

In 2016,January 2017, we made a private placement of NIS 118 million par value of our Series C Debentures to Israeli institutional investors for an aggregate consideration of approximately NIS 118 million (approximately $31 million).

In 2017, we expect that our dividends from Bezeq will be sufficient to service our NIS 430349 million (approximately $110$91 million) of scheduled debt payments, consisting of interest payments on the NotesSeries C Debentures in the amount of NIS 86 million and principal and interest payments on the Series B Debentures.Debentures in the amount of NIS 262 million. We also expect to have sufficient funds to service our expected indebtedness beyond 2016.2018.

As of December 31, 2015, our cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and short term investments on an unconsolidated basis totaled NIS 953 million (approximately $244 million). Following the sale of some of our Bezeq shares in February 2016, we own approximately 14.2 million Bezeq ordinary shares that are free from any encumbrances. These shares can, if necessary, be used as collateral to refinance old debt or may be sold for cash.

In August 2014, our Board of Directors approved the repurchase of up to $50 million of our Notes. In 2015, we repurchased $26.9 million par value of the Notes. In January 2016, our Board of Directors approved an extension of the Notes Repurchase Plan by $50 million. From January 1, 2016 through April 18, 2016, we purchased an additional $37.7 million par value of the Notes. The total par value of Notes that were repurchased from August 2014 through April 18, 2016 is $64.6 million par value.

On February 2, 2016, we sold 115,500,000 Bezeq shares and received gross proceeds of NIS 982 million in the aggregate (approximately $248 million). According to the terms of the Indenture for the Notes, the net proceeds from the sale of any Bezeq shares must be deposited into our “Lockbox Account” and are subject to other customary conditions and covenants relating to asset sales and release of liens on sold assets. In addition, according to the terms of the Indenture, we must make an offer within 365 days to the holders of the Notes to purchase Notes with the proceeds deposited in the lockbox account at a cash offer price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of purchase.

96

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources of the Bezeq Group

 

As of December 31, 20152016, the Bezeq Group had cash and cash equivalents and currentshort term investments of NIS 1.31.23 billion (approximately $338$321 million) compared to cash and cash equivalents and current investments of NIS 2.91.3 billion at December 31, 2014.2015.

 

The Bezeq Group incurred consolidated capital expenditures of NIS 1.61.42 billion (approximately $414$368 million) in the year ended December 31, 2015,2016, compared with NIS 1.31.64 billion in the year ended December 31, 2014.2015. The capital expendituresdecrease was primarily due to a reduction in investments in all group segments and specifically at Pelephone, mainly due to payments in 2015 were primarily for the development of communications infrastructure in the amount of NIS 1.1 billion (approximately $278 million) and for investments in intangible assets and deferred expenses in the amount of NIS 194 million (approximately $50 million) compared with investments of NIS 1.0 billion for the development of communications infrastructure and of NIS 186 million for intangible assets and deferred expenses in 2014.LTE 4G frequencies.

 

In the year ended December 31, 2015,2016, the Bezeq Group repaid debt and paid interest of NIS 1.72.3 billion (approximately $444$598 million), compared with NIS 1.32.7 billion for year ended December 31, 2014.2015. In addition, the Bezeq Group paid dividends of NIS 1.81.4 billion (approximately $455$375 million) in 20152016 compared to NIS 2.11.8 billion in 2014.2015.

 

The Bezeq Group’s average debt (including current maturities) to financial institutions and debenture holders for the year ended December 31, 20152016 was NIS 10.911.0 billion (approximately $2.8$2.9 billion). The average supplier credit for the year ended December 31, 20152016 was NIS 903912 million (approximately $231$237 million), the average short-term customer credit for the year ended December 31, 20152016 was NIS 2.22.0 billion (approximately $564$527 million), and average long-term customer credit was NIS 516476 million (approximately $132$124 million).

 

The Bezeq Group working capital deficit as of December 31, 20152016 was NIS 1.1 billion407 million (approximately $294$106 million) compared with a surplus of NIS 1.71.1 billion on December 31, 2014.2015. Bezeq (according to its separate financial statements) had a working capital deficit of NIS 2.1 billion944 million (approximately $548$246 million) as of December 31, 2015,2016, compared with a working capital surplusdeficit of NIS 386 million2.1 billion as of December 31, 2014.2015.

 

The Board of Directors of the Bezeq Group reviewed the company’sits existing and projected resources and cash flows for the foreseeable future and its investment needs, as well as the sources of finance and the potential amounts that will be required by the Bezeq Group in the foreseeable future. On the basis of its review of all these factors, Bezeq’sthe Bezeq Group’s Board of Directors concluded that the Bezeq Group can meet its existing cash needs and its needs for the foreseeable future from cash generated from its operations, by receipt of dividends from subsidiaries and by raising debt, from banking and non-banking sources, should it determine to do so.

 

Bezeq

 

As of December 31, 2016, Bezeq did not have any short-term debt. The following table below describesshows the Bezeq Groupdistribution of long-term debtloans (including current maturities) as of December 31, 2015::

 

Loan term Source of financing 

Amount

(NIS millions)

  Currency
or
linkage
 Type of interest and change mechanism 

Average interest rate

 

Effective interest rate

 

Interest
range in
2015

  Source of financing Principal amount
(NIS
millions)
  Currency or linkage Type of
interest and
change
mechanism
 Average
interest rate
  Effective interest
rate
  Interest
range in
2016
 
 Banks  1,331  Unlinked NIS Variable, based on prime rate  1.64%  1.64% 1.27%-1.95% Banks  978  Unlinked NIS Variable, based on prime rate*  1.71%  1.72%  1.27%-1.80%
 Banks  1,823  Unlinked NIS Fixed  5.21%  5.27% 2.40%-6.85% Banks  2,234  Unlinked NIS Fixed  4.51%  4.56%  2.40%-6.85%
Long-term loans Non-bank sources  734  Unlinked NIS Variable, based on annual STL rate  1.56%  1.60% 1.47%-1.61% Non-bank sources  734  Unlinked NIS Variable, based on annual STL rate**  1.57%  1.62%  1.47%-1.62%
 Non-bank sources  1,675  Unlinked NIS Fixed  5.53%  5.61% 3.65%-6.65% Non-bank sources  2,593  Unlinked NIS Fixed  4.41%  4.54%  3.11%-6.65%
 Non-bank sources  3,661  CPI-linked NIS Fixed  2.63%  2.68% 2.20%-5.30% Non-bank sources  3,344  CPI-linked NIS Fixed  2.49%  2.55%  2.20%-3.70%

 

*Prime interest rate as at March 2017 – 1.6%.
**STL yield per year (218) – 0.158% (average of last 5 trading days of February 2017) for the interest period that began on March 1, 2017.

For additional details about Bezeq’s loans, see Note 12 to its 2016 Financial Statements (which information is not incorporated by reference into this annual report).

 9785 

 

 

Restrictions on borrowings

Restrictions included in Bezeq's loans

As of December 31, 2015 Bezeq was in compliance with all the restrictions applicable to it.

Bank of Israel restrictions on a single borrower and group of borrowers

 

Directives of the Supervisor of Banks include restrictions on liability of a single borrower and of a group of borrowers towards the banks. Concerning these directives, Bezeq could be seen as part of one "group of borrowers" with B Communications Group and its controlling shareholders. The directives of the Supervisor of Banks could from time to time affect the ability of Israeli banks to grant further credit to Bezeq.

 

Reportable credit

 

     December 31, 2015  December 31, 2014    
  Note  Carrying amount  Nominal value  Carrying amount  Nominal value  Interest rate range 
     NIS million  NIS million  NIS million  NIS million    
Loans                  
Total unlinked loans at variable interest  12.3   1,331   1,331   1,656   1,656   Prime -0.33% to +0.2% 
Total unlinked loans at fixed interest  12.3   1,589   1,589   1,796   1,796   6.85% - 5% 
Total unlinked loans at fixed interest  12.3   300   300   300   300   2.4%
CPI-linked loans at fixed interest      -   -   22   18   4.45%-4.6% 
Total loans      3,220   3,220   3,774   3,770     
Debentures issued to the public                        
CPI-linked debentures at fixed interest - Series 5  12.3.1   310   251   613   503   5.3%
CPI-linked debentures at fixed interest - Series 6  12.3   3,087   2,874   3,165   2,874   3.7%
Unlinked debentures at variable interest - Series 7  12.3   734   734   734   734   Makam for one year +1.4% 
Unlinked debentures at fixed interest - Series 8  12.3   886   886   1,329   1,329   5.7%
Unlinked debentures at fixed interest - Series 9  12.3   388   388   -   -   3.65%
CPI-linked debentures at fixed interest - Series 10  12.3   400   400   -   -   2.2%
Total debentures issued to the public      5,805   5,533   5,841   5,440     
Non-marketable debentures issued to financial institutions:                        
Unlinked debentures at fixed interest  12.3   400   400   400   400   6.65%
CPI-linked debentures at fixed interest  12.4   1,288   1,097   -   -   5.35%-8.4%
CPI-linked debentures at fixed interest      -   -   72   58   4.4%-4.6%
Total debentures issued to financial institutions      1,688   1,497   472   458     
                         
Total debentures      7,493   7,030   6,313   5,898     
                         
Total interest-bearing liabilities      10,713   10,250   10,087   9,668     

For Debentures (Series 5), standard grounds were established for immediate repayment, including breach events, insolvency, dissolution procedures or receivership.and loan terms

 

For Debentures (Series 6 to 10) and bank

    December 31, 2016  December 31,2015   
  Note Carrying amount  Nominal value  Carrying amount  Nominal value  Interest rate range
    NIS million  NIS million  NIS million  NIS million   
Bank loans:                    
Unlinked loans at variable interest 12.3  978   978   1,331   1,331  Prime -0.33% to prime +0.2%
Unlinked loans at fixed interest 12.3  1,084   1,084   1,589   1,589  6.85% - 5%
Unlinked loans at fixed interest 12.3  300   300   300   300  2.4%
Unlinked loans at fixed interest 12.3  914   900   -   -  3.62% - 3.5%
Total bank loans    3,276   3,262   3,220   3,220   
Loan from financial institutions:                    
Unlinked loans at fixed interest 12.3  500   500   -   -  4.15%
Unlinked loans at fixed interest 12.3  147   147   -   -  5.25% - 5%
Total loans from financial institutions    647   647   -   -   
                     
Total loans    3,923   3,909   3,220   3,220   
                     
Debentures issued to the public                    
Series 6 - linked to the CPI, at fixed interest 12.3  3,041   2,874   3,087   2,874  3.7%
Series 7 - unlinked loans at variable interest 12.3  734   734   734   734  Makam +1.4%
Series 8 - unlinked loans at fixed interest 12.3  443   443   886   886  5.7%
Series 9 - unlinked loans at fixed interest 12.3  1,144   1,103   388   388  3.65%
Series 10 - linked to the CPI, at fixed interest 12.3  400   400   400   400  2.2%
Series 5 - linked to the CPI, at fixed interest    -   -   310   251  5.3%
Total debentures issued to the public    5,762   5,554   5,805   5,533   
Non-marketable debentures issued to financial institutions:                    
Debentures issued by DBS - linked to the CPI, at fixed interest 12.4  868   753   1,288   1,097  5.35%-8.4%
Unlinked loans at fixed interest 12.3  400   400   400   400  6.65%
Total non-marketable debentures    1,268   1,153   1,688   1,497   
                     
Total debentures    7,030   6,707   7,493   7,030   
                     
Total loans and debentures    10,953   10,616   10,713   10,250   

86

Terms of the loans and for debentures issued to financial institutions in the amount of NIS 400 million, by Bezeq

Bezeq has undertaken not to create additional liens on its assets unless liens are created at the same time in favor of the debenture holders and the lending banks (negative lien). The lien includes exceptions, including regarding a lien on assets that will be purchased or expanded by Bezeq, if the undertakings underlying the lien are created for the purchase or expansion of those assets and for the matter of a token lien.

 

98

For Debentures (Series 6 to 8), loans from banks and bank loansfinancial institutions, and for debentures issued tofrom financial institutions, in the amount of NIS 400 million, standard grounds were included for immediate repayment of the debentures and loans, including breach events, insolvency, dissolution procedures or receivership. In addition, a right was determined to call for immediate repayment if a third partythird-party lender calls for immediate repayment of Bezeq's debts in an amount exceeding the amount determined.

In addition, for loans from financial institutions amounting to NIS 500 million, a standard cause was included for immediate repayment of the loans, if telecommunication ceases to be the Group's core activity.

 

For Debentures (Series 6 to 10) and banks loans in the amount of NIS 2.032.8 billion as at December 31, 2015 (out of the total bank2016 (for loans in the amount offrom financial institutions amounting to NIS 3.2 billion),500 million, and for debentures issued tofrom financial institutions in the amount ofamounting to NIS 400 million, Bezeq has undertaken that if it Bezeq makes an undertaking towards any entity in respect of compliance with financial covenants, itBezeq will also provide the same undertaking to thethese debenture holders, banks and banksfinancial institutions (subject to certain exceptions).

 

For Debentures (Series 6 to 10), and for loans from financial institutions amounting to NIS 500 million, Bezeq has undertaken to the debenture holderslenders to take steps so that, to the extent under its control, the debentures will be rated by at least one rating agency, so long as there are debentures of the relevant series in circulation.circulation or a balance in loans, as the case may be.

  

In addition, for Debentures (Series 9 and 10), standard grounds were included for immediate repayment of the debentures, including events of default, insolvency, liquidation proceedings, or receivership, as well as the right to call for immediate repayment if a third party lender calls for immediate repayment of Bezeq's debts (in an amount exceeding NIS 150 million, if another series of marketable debentures is called for immediate repayment - an unlimited amount), in the event of the sale of more than 50% of the Bezeq Group's assets (consolidated) such that communications will cease being the Bezeq Group's main activity, in the event of a change of control following which the current controlling shareholders in Bezeq will cease to bebeing controlling shareholders (other than transfer of control to a transferee that received approval to control Bezeq in accordance with the provisions of the Communications Law or change in control under other circumstances that were established), in the event that a going concern qualification is recorded in Bezeq's financial statements for two consecutive quarters, in the event of a material deterioration in Bezeq's business compared with the situation at the time of the issue, and there is real concern that Bezeq will not be able to repay the debentures on time (as set out in section 35I(1)(a)(1) in the Securities Law), all under the terms set out in the deed of trust of the debentures.

 

ResultsAs at December 31, 2016 and the approval date of tenderthe financial statements, Bezeq was in compliance with all the terms and covenants of its loans and debentures, there were no grounds to call for the receipt of preliminary undertakings from classified investors for the purchase of Debentures (Series 9) (“Debentures”)immediate repayment.

 

On April 18, 2016, a preliminary tender was held by bezeq for the receipt of preliminary undertakings from classified investors, in preparation for a possible public offering of debentures to be issued, to the extent issued, as part of the expansion of an existing series

87

Reportable credit

Below is information about Bezeq’s reportable credit, in accordance with Legal Bulletin No. 104-15: A reportable credit event, issued by the Israel Securities Authority on December 30, 2011 and amended on March 19, 2017 (according to Bezeq’s shelf prospectus,information, debentures and loans amount to more than NIS 1 billion). The debentures were issued by Bezeq without a specific purpose. The debenture principal is repayable in equal payments with the shelf offering report intended for publicationinterest payable on the outstanding loan principal, as set out in the coming days (the “Shelf Offering Report”). As part of the tender, units were offered which include debentures with a par value of NIS 1,000 each, through a uniform offering, by way of a tender for the unit price (the “Tender”). In total, orders aggregating to approximately NIS 1.2 billion have been received as part of the tender, of which Bezeq received preliminary undertakings from classified investors for the purchase of approximately NIS 713,572,000 in Debentures at a price of NIS 1,077 per unit with a unit par value of NIS 1,000. The price determined in the Tender will constitute the minimum price of a public tender in connection with the Debentures. It is clarified that the final price of the Debentures units will be determined in the framework of the public offering to be held by bezeq, to the extent held, as part of the Shelf Offering Report, through a uniform offering, by way of tender for the unit price.table below.

Lender Date of loan Date of final repayment Type of loan 

Amount of the original loan or par value

(NIS million)

  

Estimated reserve

(plus interest payable)

December 31, 2016

(NIS million)

  Number of principal payments in the year  Principal payments as from  Number of interest payments in the year  

Interest rate

December 31, 2016

  

Fair value of the liability

December 31, 2016

(NIS million)

  Imputed effective interest at fair value as at December 31, 2016  Imputed effective interest at fair value as at December 31, 2015  Right to early repayment
Debentures (Series 6) July 3, 2011 Dec 1, 2022 CPI-linked fixed interest  2,874   2,953   1   2018   2   3.70%  3,247   1.08%  1.43% No
Debentures (Series 9) Oct 15, 2015 Dec 1, 2025 Unlinked fixed interest NIS  1,103   1,106   1   2022   2   3.65%  1,146   3.13%  3.08% No

88

 

Credit received during the reporting period/commitmentsUndertakings to extendprovide credit for 2017

In 2015 and in the beginning of 2016, Bezeq signed agreements with banks and institutional entities under which it received a commitment to extend credit for future financing of Bezeq in 2016-2017 as follows:

Credit
extension date
Credit in 
NIS millionsAverage lifecycle (years) and repayment datesTotal interest rate (fixed, NIS and unlinked)
June 2016900

4.6


(Repayment in five equal annual installments from June 1, 2019 to June 1, 2023)

3.71%
December 20165004.9

(Repayment in five equal annual installments from December 15, 2019 to December 15, 2023)
4.25%
June 20179004.5

(Repayment as from June 2020 until June 2024)
4.25%

In 2015, Bezeq entered into agreements with banks and financial institutions, whereby Bezeq received an undertaking from these institutions to provide credit to Bezeq in a total amount of NIS 1.4 billion to refinance its future debt in 2016 (with an average duration of between 4.62017 amounting to 4.9 years and a fixed NIS interest rate of 3.7% to 4.3 %), and an undertaking to provide credit of NIS 600900 million in 2017 (with an average duration of 4.5 years and an average fixed NIS interest rate of 4.3%)4.3 %).

 

The terms of all the undertakings and the loans to be provided thereunder include terms that are similar to the terms provided for other loans taken by Bezeq, as described in section 12.3 above, including the following: an undertaking to refrain from creating additional liens on Bezeq's assets (with certain restrictions); an undertaking that if Bezeq assumes an undertaking towards a party in respect of compliance with financial covenants, Bezeq will also assume the same undertaking for this credit (subject to certain exceptions); and standard terms for immediate repayment (such as default events, insolvency, liquidation or receivership), and cross default (with certain restrictions), which will also apply, with the required changes, to the periods of the undertaking to provide credit. In addition, some of the undertakings to provide credit in 2017 also include terms that are similar to the terms that were established for Debentures (Series 9 and 10).

Subsequent to the date of the financial statements, Bezeq signed another agreement to provide a loan of NIS 500 million in 2017, in similar terms to the above.

Credit received during the reporting period/commitments to extend credit

In 2015-2017, Bezeq signed agreements with banks and institutional entities under which it received a commitment to extend credit for future financing of Bezeq in 2017 as follows:

Credit extension date Credit in
NIS millions
  Average life (years)
and repayment dates
  Total average interest rate (fixed, NIS and unlinked) 
June 2017 and September 2017  1,400   5   4.2%
       (Repayment as from June 2020 until December 2024)     

The terms of all these commitments and the loans granted thereunder include similar terms to those provided with respect to other loans taken by Bezeq defined in Note 12.6 of the 2016 Financial Statements, including: an undertaking not to create any other charges on Bezeq's assets (with certain restrictions), an undertaking that should it make a commitment to any entity in connection with financial covenants, Bezeq will undertake the same commitment also in connection with this credit (subject to certain exceptions), and standard terms for immediate repayment (such as a violations, insolvency, liquidation or receivership, etc., and cross default, with certain restrictions), which will apply, with the necessary changes, also with respect to the credit extension undertaking periods. Some of the commitments to extend credit in 2017 also include the same terms as those given in the public debt raising of October 2015, as set out in Note 12 of the 2016 Financial Statements.

In 2016, credit of NIS 1,400 million was provided to Bezeq, based on undertakings to provide credit given to Bezeq.

Bezeq debentures

On April 21, 2016, Bezeq completed an issuance by way of an expansion of an existing series of marketable debentures (Series 9) according to a shelf prospectus. Within the context of this issuance, a total of NIS 714,050,000 par value was issued in consideration of NIS 769 million. The conditions of the issued debentures are the same as those of the outstanding Series 9 debentures.

Credit rating

Bezeq’s debentures are rated il/AA/Stable by S&P Maalot Ltd. and Aa2 with a stable outlook.by Midroog Ltd.

 

 9989 

 

 

Subsequent to December 31, 2015, Bezeq signed another agreement to obtain a loan of NIS 300 million in 2017.

Bonds

On October 15, 2015, Bezeq completed the issue of bonds (Series 9 and 10) under its shelf offering dated October 13, 2015, which was published under its shelf prospectus dated May 30, 2014. The total gross consideration received in this issuance under the shelf offering amounted to NIS 788,451,000 as follows:

Consideration (gross)Annual interest and linkageRepayment dates and interest payment (in both series)
Bonds (Series 9)NIS 388,451,0003.65% unlinkedPrincipal - 4 unequal payments: 10% on December 1, 2022 and 30% on each of the dates December 1, 2023, December 1, 2024, December 1, 2025
Bonds (Series 10)NIS 400,000,0002.2%, CPI-linkedInterest - six-monthly payments on June 1 and December 1 of each year.

Bezeq also provided undertakings with respect to both bond series: (i) to not create any other charges on its assets (negative charge) without creating an identical charge in favor of the bond holders; (ii) should it make a commitment in connection with financial covenants, it will undertake to make the same commitment to the bond holders; and (iii) to do everything under its control for the bonds to continue to be rated until they are fully repaid.

The accepted grounds for recalling the bonds for immediate repayment were added, including violations, insolvency, liquidation procedures, receivership, etc.; the right to demand immediate repayment if a third party lender demanded immediate repayment of Bezeq's debt to it (for an amount that exceeds NIS 150 million, if another negotiable bond series is recalled for immediate repayment, the amount is unlimited); if more than 50% of the Group's assets (consolidated) are sold in a manner that the communication segment ceases to be the Group's central operation; in case of changes in control whereby the current controlling shareholder ceases to be its controlling shareholder (other than transfer of control to a recipient that obtained approval for control of Bezeq according to the provisions of the Communications Law or a change of control under other circumstances prescribed), if a "going concern" caveat is recorded in Bezeq's financial statements for a period of two consecutive quarters; material impairment of Bezeq's business compared to its situation on the issue date; and real concern that Bezeq will not be able to repay the bonds on time, all under the terms set out in the Deeds of Trust of the bonds.

Credit rating

Bezeq’s bonds are rated an il/AA/Stable by S&P Maalot Ltd., and an Aa2 rating with a stable outlook by Midroog Ltd.

Assessmentassessment for raising financing and possible sources in 20162017

During 2016,In 2017, Bezeq expects to repay approximately NIS 1,786 million1.71 billion on account of loan principal and interest (including bonds)debentures). Bezeq expectsexpect to exercise undertakings to obtain creditsprovide credit of NIS 1.4 billion received from various banks and institutional entities.

 

Bezeq raises capital from time to time to finance its cash flow. The financing options at Bezeq's disposal are to raise debt by means of new bank loans and/or by raising private or negotiable debt and to exercise undertakings for credit extension for 2016-2017.2017.

 

Charges and guarantees

100

 

For information about charges and guarantees of Bezeq, see Note 18 to Bezeq’s 2016 Financial Statements (which are not incorporated by reference in this annual report.

 

Guarantee of DBS bonds

In September 2015, Bezeq signed guarantee letters for compliance with DBS' undertakings to pay its full outstanding debt to the holders of bondsdebentures (Series B) and 2012 bonds of DBS (total oftotaling NIS 1.05 billion and(the outstanding debt as at December 31, 2016 is NIS 307 million, respectively), against636 million) in consideration of a decrease in the annual interest rate borne byof the bondsdebentures (by 0.5% and 1%, respectively)), and cancellation of collateral and certain provisions of the Deeds of Trust and the bondsdebentures (including the undertakings for compliance by DBS of certainto comply with financial covenants and restriction on distribution of a dividend by DBS), all according to the terms of the Deeds of Trust of the bonds.. According to the terms of the bonds,debentures, decreasing the interest and canceling collateral and certain other provisions inof the bondsdebentures are subject to Bezeq's Maalot rating not falling below (-AA) or a corresponding rating, ("the Minimum Rating"), terms that were complied with as at the date of providing the collateral was provided, and ifcollateral. If in the future Bezeq's rating falls below the Minimum Rating,Maalot rating of –AA, the interest reduction will be canceled, the canceled collateral will be provided again, the canceled provisionprovisions will reapply and the guarantee will expire. On December 17, 2015, Bezeq provided DBS with a loan of NIS 325 million in order to allow DBS to early repay its 2012 bonds. The early repayment was made on December 20, 2015 and at that same time Bezeq's guarantee for the 2012 bonds expired.

 

Pelephone

Pelephone's operations are financed out of cash flow from operating activities. In 2015 Pelephone repaid the balance of its liabilities of NIS 93 million. As at December 31, 2015, Pelephone has no approved bank credit facilities.

Although Pelephone intends to make further investments in property, plant and equipment (mainly in the LTE network), it estimates that it will not need to obtain any financing in 2016 for its ongoing operations.

 

Bezeq International

 

Bezeq International has no outstanding debt other than to Bezeq.

 

DBS

Bank financing

 

In the reporting year DBS was party to a financing agreement with a consortium of banks which was renewed in July 2012 (respectively: "the Financing Agreement" and "the Banks"). According to the Financing Agreement, DBS received an on-going credit facility until the end of 2015 in the amount of NIS 170 million, and a hedge facility of USD 10 million. According to the Financing Agreement in each quarter DBS is required to comply with EBITDA/debt ratio and (E-C)/maximum debt ratio criteria as set out in the Financing Agreement. As at December 31, 2015 DBS is in compliance with these covenants. On December 31, 2015 the Banks approved the repayment of the entire unpaid balance of the borrowings provided by the Banks under the Financing Agreement, and on December 31, 2015 the Financing Agreement was terminated as well as all of DBS's liabilities thereunder towards the Banks, and accordingly, all the liens charged in favor of the Banks were canceled.

As of the date of this report, some of the Banks have extended lines of credit and unsecured guarantees to DBS.

In December 2014, DBS entered into an unsecured loan agreement, or the Loan Agreement, with several banks in the amount of NIS 75 million, bearing fixed annual interest of 3.4%. The bank borrowings were extended for a period of five and a half years (until June 2020) and are being repaid (principal and interest) in 11 consecutive semi-annual installments commencing in June 2015. The Loan Agreement provides grounds for calling for immediate repayment, including various violations of the Loan Agreement, dissolution procedures and receivership against DBS, cancellation or suspension of the broadcasting license, unauthorized change of control, material violation of material agreements defined in the Loan Agreement and calling for immediate repayment of amount due from DBS to debenture holders, other banks or financial institutions. In December 2015 an amendment to the Loan Agreement was signed, under which certain provisions in the Loan Agreement were amended or rescinded, including cancellation of DBS obligation to comply with financial covenants and restrictions applicable to dividends and DBS repayment of shareholders loans.

Institutional financing

DBS has two debenture series issued to institutional investors and that were listed under the TACT Institutional Market of the TASE. A debenture series issued in 2007 under a deed of trust, or Deed of Trust A, between DBS and Hermetic Trust (1975) Ltd., or Trustee A, and its expansion in April 2014, or the Series A Debentures, and a debenture series issued in 2010 under a deed of trust, or Deed of Trust B, between DBS and Hermetic Trust (1975) Ltd., or Trustee B, that was expanded in 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 and in April and May 2015, or the Series B Debentures. Under Deed of Trust A, DBS created a first degree floating charge, unlimited in amount, in favor of Trustee A on all its assets (other than exceptions due to the provisions of the Communications Law), that contain a condition restricting the creation of additional charges (subject to exceptions set out in Deed of Trust A and the Deed of Pledge), and (subject to exceptions provided by the Communications Law) a first degree fixed charge, unlimited in amount, over the rights and assets, including its rights under material agreements to which it is party, its unissued registered capital, its goodwill, certain intellectual property rights and insurance rights to which it is entitled under the insurance policy taken out for it. DBS may record, in favor of holders of other debentures that it may issue, first degree liens and/or add them to liens in favor of Trustee A, without requiring the consent of Trustee A.

Source of financing Amount at December 31, 2015
(NIS millions)
  Currency or linkage Average interest rate  Effective interest 
Long-term loans Banking sources  49  NIS  3.43%  3.46%
 Non-bank (1)  818  CPI-linked NIS  6.03%  6.12%

 

101

Deed of Trust A and Deed of Trust B set out routine events (such as insolvency proceedings, violation, exercise of liens on most of Bezeq's assets and others) that, should they occur, following a warning period and under terms that were set in each Deed, establish the right to call for the immediate repayment of the debentures, subject to the provisions of the Deed of Trust, and the right to call for immediate repayment in the event of calling for immediate repayment of another DBS debenture series, if the outstanding balance exceeds the amount fixed in the Deed of Trust.

In September 2015, Bezeq signed a deed of guarantee to meet DBS's liabilities in favor of the holders of the Series B Debentures, resulting in a reduction of the interest rate and cancellation of certain collateral (which were similar to those recorded in favor of Trustee A) and various provisions of Deed of Trust B.

On December 20, 2015, DBS redeemed the outstanding balance of debentures it issued in May 2012, with the proceeds of a NIS 323 million loan from Bezeq. The loan from Bezeq bears fixed annual interest of 3.6% (but not less than the minimum interest rate under section 3(J) of the Income Tax Ordinance.)

S&P Maalot ratings for DBS and its debentures

In October 2015 S&P Maalot announced that it was upgrading DBS's rating (by making it equivalent to the rating of Bezeq following Bezeq's acquisition of all of DBS’s shares), so that DBS is rated ilAA (stable) (issuer rating), and the stable outlook is based on the rating outlook of Bezeq. The debentures issued by DBS are rated by S&P Maalot as ilAA.

Credit facilities (in NIS millions)

Credit facility  Used as at Dec. 31, 2015  Used as at Dec. 31, 2014 
 0   0   4 

Estimate regarding the need to raise sources of financing in 2016

According to the payment schedule for DBS's debentures in 2016, DBS expects to repay NIS -58 million on account of principal and interest of its loans. DBS finances its operations mainly from cash flows from ongoing operations and by raising debt.

The management of DBS believes that the financial resources available to it, including among other things receiving loans from Bezeq, will be sufficient for its operating needs in the coming year based on the projected cash flow approved by DBS’s board of directors.

Average interest rate on loans

Source of financing Amount at
December 31, 2015
(NIS millions)
  Currency or
linkage
 Average
interest rate
  Effective
interest rate
 
Long-term loans Banking sources  64  NIS  3.45%  3.48%
 Non-bank (1)  1,210  CPI-linked NIS  6.2%  6.93%
 Shareholder loans(2)  4,567  CPI-linked NIS  6.1%  6.2%

(1)The non-banking credit, which is valid until December 31, 2015, is made up of debentures.

(2)Loans providedIn September 2016, the boards of directors of Bezeq and of DBS approved converting the shareholders' loans recorded in Bezeq’s name in DBS's books (including loans acquired from Eurocom), that were granted until June 23, 2015, the total balance of which, principle and cumulative interest as of September 7, 2016 amounted to DBS by its shareholdersNIS 5,319,400 thousand, into capital that will be recorded in DBS's books as premium on shares. Until they are converted, these loans will be linked to the CPIconsumer price index and are dividedclassified into three types: A.categories: a. interest-free loans; B. loans bearing annual interest of 5.5%; C. loans bearing annual interest of 11%.; In this regard, see also Note 6 to the 2016 Financial Statements. In addition, in December 2016, additional loans provided by Bezeq to DBS, in the amount of NIS 389 million, principal and cumulated interest, were also converted.

90

Institutional financings

As of December 31, 2016, DBS has outstanding Debentures (Series A) with a balance of NIS 190 million and Debentures (Series B) with a balance of NIS 678 million, issued to institutional investors and listed on the TACT-Institutional system of the TASE.

In accordance with Deed of Trust A, DBS created an unlimited floating first lien in favor of the trustee on all of its assets (other than exemptions arising from the provisions of the Communications Law), including a stipulation that limits additional liens (subject to the exceptions), and an unlimited fixed first lien on the rights and assets of DBS (subject to exceptions under the Communications Law), including its rights under material agreements to which it is a party, its unissued registered capital, goodwill, certain intellectual property rights and insurance rights under its insurance policies.

Deed of Trust A and Deed of Trust B stipulate standard events (such as insolvency, default and exercise of liens on most of the assets of DBS and more), which, should they occur, after the warning period and terms set out in each deed of trust, will allow immediate call for repayment of the debentures under the provisions in the deed of trust, and establish the right to call for immediate payment if another debenture series of DBS is called for immediate repayment, if the balance for settlement exceeds the amount set out in the relevant deed of trust.

In September 2015, Bezeq signed a letter of guarantee for the undertakings of DBS in favor of the holders of Debentures (Series B), against a reduction of the interest rate for Debentures (Series B) and cancellation of collateral (similar to those registered in favor of the trustee for Trust A) and certain provisions in Deed of Trust B, all in accordance with the terms set out in Deed of Trust B.

A reduction in the interest rate and cancellation of the collateral and certain provisions in Deed of Trust B are contingent on the rating of Bezeq not falling below a rating of AA- by S&P Maalot or a corresponding rating ("the Minimum Rating"), a condition that was fulfilled as at the date of the guarantee, and as at the date of the financial statements, and if, in the future, the rating of Bezeq falls below the Minimum Rating, then the reduction in the interest rate will be cancelled, the collateral that was cancelled will be provided again, the provisions that were cancelled will be applicable again, and the guarantee will expire.

As of October 2015, DBS was rated ilAA (stable) by S&P Maalot, following the acquisition of DBS by Bezeq. The debentures issued by DBS are rated by S&P Maalot as ilAA. In July 2016, S&P ratified DBS's ilAA rating with stable outlook, while in its announcement it stated that a change in Bezeq’s rating will affect DBS's rating.

 

Cash Flows

 

Cash Flows of Our Company

 

The following table summarizes our consolidated cash flows on a consolidated basis for the periods presented:presented

 

 Year ended December 31,  Year ended December 31, 
 2013 2014 2015  2016 2015 2014 
 (NIS in millions)  (NIS in millions) 
Net cash provided by operating activities  4,145   3,789   3,652   3,462   3,652   3,789 
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities  (1,014)  (1,896)  310   (948)  310   (1,896)
Net cash used in financing activities  (3,149)  (1,919)  (4,094)  (2,333)  (4,094)  (1,919)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  (18)  (26)  (132)  181   (132)  (26)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year  757   739   713   581   713   739 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year  739   713   581   762   581   713 

Operating Activities

Consolidated cash provided by operating activities in 20152016 amounted to NIS 3.5 billion (approximately $0.9 billion) compared to NIS 3.7 billion (approximately $0.94 billion) compared to NIS 3.8 billion in 2014.2015. The decrease in net cash provided from operating activities was primarily attributable to the Domestic Fixed-Line Communications segment following changes in working capital (mainly employee retirement payments), and the Cellular Communications segment due to a material decrease in netlower profits and a more moderate decrease in trade receivables balances as compared to 2014. Thisthe 2015. The decrease was mainlypartially offset by the consolidation of DBS cash flows, which generated NIS 356 million (approximately $91 million) along with an increase in cash from operating activities in the Domestic Fixed-Line Communications segment.for a full year.

102

 

Investing Activities

 

Consolidated cash used in investing activities in the year ended December 31, 2016, was NIS 948 million (approximately $247 million) compared with NIS 310 million provided by investing activities in the year ended December 31, 2015 was NIS 310 million (approximately $81 million) compared with NIS 1.9 billion used in investing activities in the year ended December 31, 2014.2015. The increase in net cash provided byused in investing activities was due to an increase in thelower net proceeds from the sale of short term investmentsheld-for-trading financial assets in Bezeq along with athe Domestic Fixed-Line Communications segment of NIS 299 million1.4 billion (approximately $77$364 million) of cash generated from the consolidation of DBS.. The increase was partially offset by the consolidation of DBS's cash used in investing activities as of the second quarter of 2015also due to tax payments on finance income from shareholder loans in the amount of NIS 250461 million (approximately $64$120 million). In addition, and from cash flows usedof NIS 299 million added in investing activities in 2014 included NIS 596 millionthe first quarter of proceeds from the sale2015 after assuming control of Coral-Tell shares by Bezeq.DBS.

91

 

Financing Activities

 

Consolidated cash used in financing activities in the year ended December 31, 20152016 was NIS 4.12.3 billion (approximately $1.1 billion)$607 million) compared to NIS 1.94.1 billion in the year ended December 31, 2014.2015. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in debenture repayments, a decrease in debenture issuances by Bezeq and thecash inflows from receipt of loans byand a debenture issuance in the Domestic Fixed-Line Communications segment. The increase was also attributable to the paymentsegment of NIS 680 million2.16 billion (approximately $174$562 million) as compared to Eurocom D.B.S.a debenture issuance of NIS 1.01 billion (approximately $263 million) in the Domestic Fixed-Line Communications and DBS segments in 2015. The additional payment for the acquisitionpurchase of DBSDBS's shares and loans andwas lower in the consolidation ofin the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to 2015. DBS which made debtdebenture repayments of NIS 633 million (approximately $162 million).were also lower in the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to 2015.

 

The Bezeq Group’s Cash Flows

 

The following table summarizes the Bezeq Group’s consolidated cash flows for the periods presented:

 

 Year ended December 31,  Year ended December 31, 
 2013 2014 2015  2016  2015  2014 
 (NIS in millions)  (NIS in millions) 
Net cash provided by operating activities  4,152   3,796   3,740   3,526   3,740   3,796 
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities  (917)  (1,546)  283   (1,567)  283   (1,546)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities  (3,091)  (2,200)  (4,128)  (1,866)  (4,128)  (2,200)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and equivalents  144   50   (105)  93   (105)  50 
Cash and cash equivalents as at the beginning of the period  466   610   660   555   660   610 
Cash and cash equivalents as at the end of the period  610   660   555   648   555   660 

Operating Activities

 

Consolidated cash flows provided by operating activities of the Bezeq Group in the year ended December 31, 20152016 amounted to NIS 3.73.5 billion (approximately $958$917 million) compared to NIS 3.83.7 billion in the year ended December 31, 2014,2015, a decrease of NIS 56214 million ($1456 million). The decrease in net cash provided byfrom operating activities was primarily attributable to the Domestic Fixed-Line Communications segment following changes in working capital (mainly employee retirement payments) and the Cellular Communications segment due to a material decrease in netlower profits and a more moderate decrease in trade receivables balances as compared to 2014. Thisthe decrease in 2015. The decrease was mainlypartially offset by the consolidation of DBS cash flows, which generated NIS 356 million (approximately $91 million) along with an increase in cash from operating activitiesfor a full year in the Domestic Fixed-Line Communications segment.in the year ended December 31, 2016.

 

103

Investing Activities

 

Net cash provided by investing activities of the Bezeq Group for the year ended December 31 2015 was NIS 0.3 billion (approximately $73 million) compared to NIS 1.5 billion of cash used in investing activities in the year ended December 31 2014.2016 was NIS 1.6 billion (approximately $408 million) compared to NIS 283 million provided by investing activities in the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase of NIS 1.9 billion (approximately $481 million) in net cash provided fromused in investing activities was due to an increase in thelower net proceeds from the sale of short term investmentsheld-for-trading financial assets in Bezeq along with athe Domestic Fixed-Line Communications segment of NIS 299 million1.4 billion (approximately $77$364 million) of cash generated from the consolidation of DBS.. The increase was partially offset by the consolidation of DBS cash used in investing activities as of the second quarter of 2015 inalso due to tax payments on finance income from shareholder loans to the amount of NIS 250461 million (approximately $64$120 million). In addition,, and from cash flows usedof NIS 299 million added in investing activities in 2014 included NIS 596 millionthe first quarter of proceeds from the sale2015 after Bezeq assumed control of Coral-Tel shares by Bezeq.DBS.

 

Financing Activities

 

Net cash used in financing activities by the Bezeq Group in the year ended December 31, 20152016 was NIS 4.11.9 billion (approximately $1.1 billion)$485 million) compared to NIS 2.24.1 billion in the year ended December 31, 2014.2015. The increasedecrease in cash used in financing activities was primarily attributable to an increase in debenture repayments, a decrease in debenture issuances by Bezeq and thecash inflows from receipt of loans byand a debenture issuance in the Domestic Fixed-Line Communications segment. The increase was also attributablesegment to the paymentamount of NIS 680 million2.16 billion (approximately $174$562 million) in the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to Eurocom D.B.S. fora debenture issuance of NIS 1.01 billion (approximately $263 million) in the acquisitionDomestic Fixed-Line Communications and Multi-Channel Television segments in 2015. The additional payment on the purchase of DBSDBS's shares and loans was lower in the year ended December 31, 2016 than in the 2015. Debenture repayments in the Multi-Channel Television segment and dividend payments were also lower in the consolidation of DBS, which made debt repayments of NIS 633 million (approximately $162 million).year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to 2015.

92

 

Critical Accounting Policies

 

We adopted the critical accounting policies of Bezeq after our acquisition of the controlling interest in Bezeq. The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with IFRS requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the valuation of assets and expenses during the reporting period. There can be no assurance that actual results will not differ from these estimates.

 

Consolidation of the financial statements and investments in associates

 

Business combinations.Business combinations are accounted for by applying the acquisition method. The acquisition date is the date on which the acquirer obtains control over the acquiree. Control exists when the Bezeq Group is exposed or has rights to variable returns from its involvement with the acquiree and it has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the acquiree. Substantive rights held by the Bezeq Group and others are taking into account when assessing control.

 

Transactions eliminated on consolidation. Intra-group balances and income and expense arising from intra-group transactions are eliminated in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements.

 

Non-controlling interests.Transactions with non-controlling interests, while retaining control, are accounted for as equity transactions. Any difference between the consideration paid or received for change in non-controlling interests is recognizedincluded in capital reserve for transactions with non-controlling interests. The Bezeq Group elected to present the difference under capital reserve for transactions with non-controlling interests.owners’ share in equity of our company directly in retained earnings.

 

Associates (accounted for by the equity method). Associates are those entities in which the Bezeq Group has significant influence, but not control, over financial and operating policy. In respect of equity-accounted investments, goodwill is included in the carrying amount of the investment. When the Bezeq Group holds additional long-term interests in the associate (such as loans), which are a part of the Bezeq Group’s net investment in the associate, and when the Bezeq Group’s proportionate share in the additional interests is different from the Bezeq Group’s share in the equity of the associate, the Bezeq Group recognizes its share in the additional losses of the associate at its proportionate share in the additional interests according to the percentage of the Bezeq Group’s participation in all the levels of the additional interests and according to the order of priority of the additional levels of interests (“the Levels Method”). If, subsequently, the Bezeq Group recognizes its share in the profits of the associate, the Bezeq Group will recognize its share in the profits up to the amount of the cumulative losses previously recognized.

 

Financial instruments

 

Non-derivative financial assets. Non-derivative financial assets include mainly investments in exchange traded notes, financial funds, ETFs, deposit certificates, debt instruments, shares, trade and other receivables, and cash and cash equivalents. The Bezeq Group initially recognizes loans and receivables when they are originated. All other financial assets are initially recognized at the date that the Bezeq Group becomes a party to contractual provisions of the instrument. Financial assets are derecognized when the contractual rights of the Bezeq Group to the cash flows from the asset expire, or the Bezeq Group transfers the rights to receive the contractual cash flows from the financial asset in a transaction in which substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of the financial asset are transferred. Regular way sales of financial assets are recognized on the trade date, meaning on the date the Bezeq Group undertook to sell the asset.

 

104

Cash and cash equivalents. Cash comprises cash balances available for immediate use and call deposits. Cash equivalents comprise short-term highly liquid investments (with original maturities of three months or less) that are readily convertible into known amounts of cash and are exposed to insignificant risks of change in value.

 

Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss. A financial asset is classified at fair value through profit or loss if it is held for trading or is designated as such upon initial recognition. Upon initial recognition, attributable transaction costs are recognized in the statement of income as incurred. These financial assets are measured at fair value and changes therein are recognized in the statement of income.

 

Available-for-sale financial assets. The Bezeq Group’s investments in shares (through a venture capital fund) are classified as available-for-sale financial assets. These investments are measured at fair value and changes therein, other than impairment losses, are recognized directly in other comprehensive income. At the date of derecognition of the investment, profits from realization of the investment and profits that were recognized in capital reserve, are recognized in profit or loss. The Bezeq Group elected to recognize profits or losses from disposal of available-for-sale financial assets under financing income or expenses.

 

Loans and receivables. Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. Such assets are recognized initially at fair value plus attributable transaction costs. Subsequent to initial recognition, loans and receivables are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method, net of impairment losses.

 

93

Non-derivative financial liabilities. Non-derivative financial liabilities include debentures issued by the Bezeq Group, loans and borrowings from banks and other credit providers, and trade and other payables. The Bezeq Group initially recognizes debt instruments as they are incurred. Financial liabilities are initially recognized at fair value plus any attributable transaction costs. Subsequent to initial recognition, these financial liabilities are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method. Financial liabilities are derecognized when the obligation of the Bezeq Group, as specified in the agreement, expires or when it is discharged or canceled.

CPI-linked assets and liabilities that are not measured at fair value.The value of CPI-linked financial assets and liabilities, which are not measured at fair value, is revaluated in each period according to the actual increase in the CPI.

 

Offsetting financial instruments.Financial assets and liabilities are offset and the net amount presented in the statement of financial position when, and only when we or the Bezeq Group currently have a legal right to offset the amounts and intend either to settle on a net basis or to realize the asset and settle the liability simultaneously.

 

Change in terms of debt instruments. An exchange of debt instruments having substantially different terms, between an existing borrower and lender is accounted for as an extinguishment of the original financial liability and the recognition of a new financial liability at fair value. Furthermore, a substantial modification of the terms of the existing financial liability or part of it is accounted for as an extinguishment of the original financial liability and the recognition of a new financial liability.

 

The terms are substantially different if the discounted present value of the cash flows according to the new terms, including any commissions paid, less any commissions received and discounted using the original effective interest rate, is different by at least ten percent from the discounted present value of the remaining cash flows of the original financial liability.

 

Derivative financial instruments

 

Hedge accounting. The Bezeq Group holds derivative financial instruments to hedge cash flows for risks to future changes in the CPI and foreign currency exchange rate risks. Forward contracts are measured at fair value. Changes in the fair value of the derivative hedging instrument designated as a cash flow hedge are recognized through other comprehensive income, in a hedging reserve under equity, to the extent that the hedge is effective. To the extent that the hedge is ineffective, changes in fair value are recognized in profit or loss. The amount recognized in the hedging reserve is removed and included in profit or loss in the same period as the hedged cash flows affect profit or loss under the same line item in the statement of income as the hedged item.

105

 

Economic Hedges. The Bezeq Group holds other derivative financial instruments to economically hedge its exposure to foreign currency and changes in the CPI. Hedge accounting is not applied to derivative instruments that economically hedge financial assets and liabilities. Derivative instruments are recognized initially at fair value and attributable transaction costs are recognized in the statement of income as incurred. Subsequent to initial recognition, derivative financial instruments are measured at fair value and the changes in fair value are recognized in the statement of income as incurred.

 

Property, plant and equipment

 

Recognition and measurement. Items of property, plant and equipment are measured at cost less accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment losses. Cost includes expenditures that are directly attributable to acquisition of the asset. The cost of self-constructed assets includes the cost of materials, direct labor and financing costs as well as any other cost directly attributable to bringing the asset to the condition for its use intended by the management, and the costs of dismantling and removing the items and restoring the site on which they are located in cases where the Bezeq Group has an obligation to vacate and restore the site. The cost of purchased software that is integral to the functionality of the related equipment is recognized as part of the cost of the equipment. Spare parts, servicing equipment and stand-by equipment are classified as property, plant and equipment when they meet the definition of property, plant and equipment in IAS 16, and are otherwise classified as inventory. When major parts of the property, plant and equipment have different useful lives, they are accounted for as separate items (major components) of the property, plant and equipment. Gains or losses on disposal of property, plant and equipment are determined by comparing the proceeds from disposal with the carrying amount of the asset, and are recognized net under “other operating income” in the statement of income.

 

Subsequent expenditure. The cost of replacing part of an item of property, plant and equipment is recognized in the carrying amount of the item if it is probable that the future economic benefit embodied in the replaced item will flow to the Bezeq Group and its cost can be measured reliably. The costs of day-to-day servicing are recognized in the statement of income as incurred.

 

94

Depreciation.Depreciation is recognized in the statement of income on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of each part of an item of property, plant and equipment, since this most closely reflects the expected pattern of consumption of the future economic benefits embodied in the asset. Leased assets under finance lease agreements are depreciated over the shorter of the lease term and their useful lives. Depreciation of an asset starts when it is ready for use, meaning when it reaches the location and condition necessary for it to be capable of operating in the manner intended by management.

 

Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the shorter of the lease term, including the extension option held by the Bezeq Group and intended to be exercised) and the expected life of the improvement.

 

Assets are depreciated based on the following annual percentages:

 

  Years  Principal depreciation rate (%) 
       
Fixed line and international network equipment (switches, transmission, power)  4-12   12 
Network  12-33   6 
Subscriber equipment and installations  4-6   20 
Equipment and infrastructure for multichannel television  3-15   14 
Vehicles  6-7   15 
Office and general equipment  5-14   15 
Electronic equipment, computers and internal communication systems  3-7   24 
Cellular network  4-15   13 
Buildings  25   4 
Submarine communications cable  4-25   4 

106

  Years Principal depreciation rate (%)
     
Fixed line and international network equipment (switches, transmission, power) 4-12 12
Network 12-33 6
Subscriber equipment and installations 4-6 20
Equipment and infrastructure for multichannel television 3-15 14
Vehicles 6-7 15
Office and general equipment 5-14 15
Electronic equipment, computers and internal communication systems 3-7 24
Cellular network 4-15 13
Buildings 25 4
Submarine communications cable 4-25 4

 

Depreciation methods, useful lives and residual values are reviewed at least at each reporting year and adjusted as required.

 

Non-current assets

 

Non-current assets are classified as held for sale if it is highly probable that they will be recovered primarily through a sale transaction rather than their ongoing use. These assets are presented at the lower of the carrying amount and fair value, less selling costs.

 

Intangible assets

 

Goodwill and brand name. Goodwill and brand names that arise upon the acquisition of subsidiaries are included in intangible assets. Subsequent to initial recognition, goodwill and brand names are measured at cost less accumulated impairment losses. Goodwill and brand names are measured at least once a year to assess impairment.

 

Software development costs. Software development costs are recognized as an intangible asset only if the development costs can be measured reliably; the software is technically and commercially feasible; and the Bezeq Group has sufficient resources to complete the development and intends to use the software. The costs recognized as an intangible asset include the cost of the materials, direct labor and overhead expenses directly attributable to preparation of the asset for its intended use. Other development costs are recognized in the statement of income as incurred. Capitalized development costs are measured at cost less amortization and accumulated impairment losses.

 

Software.Software that is an integral part of the hardware, which cannot function without the programs installed on it, is classified as property, plant and equipment. However, licenses for stand-alone software, which adds functionality to the hardware, is classified (mainly) as intangible assets. Software depreciation is recognized in the statement of income using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the asset.

 

Rights to frequencies. Rights to frequencies refer to Pelephone’s rights to cellular communication frequencies according to a Ministry of Communications tender. Depreciation of the asset is recognized in the statement of income using the straight line method over the license term, which is 13 years and 7 months starting from the use of the frequencies.

 

Other intangible assets.Other intangible assets acquired by the Bezeq Group, which have a definite useful life, are measured at cost less amortization and accumulated impairment losses.

 

95

Subsequent expenditure.Subsequent expenditure is recognized as an intangible asset only when it increases the future economic benefits embodied in the specific asset to which it relates. All other expenditures, including expenditures relating to generated goodwill and brands, are recognized in the statement of income as incurred.

 

Amortization.Amortization, except for goodwill, brand name and customer relationships, is recognized in the statement of income on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the intangible assets, from the date on which the assets are available for use. Goodwill and brand name are not systematically amortized but are tested for impairment at least once a year. Customer relationships are amortized according to the economic benefit expected from those customers each period, which results in accelerated amortization during the early years of the relationship.

 

Estimated useful lives for the current and comparative periods are as follows:

 

Type of asset

 

Amortization period

Frequency usage rights Over the term of the license for 10 to 14 years starting from the use of the frequencies
Computer programs and software licenses 3 - 10 years according to the term of the license or the estimated time of use of the program
Customer relationships 5 - 7 years
Brand acquired in a business combination 12
Other rights 2 - 6 years according to the useful lives

107

 

Leased assets

 

Leases, including leases of land from the ILA, where the Bezeq Group assumes substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership are classified as finance leases. Upon initial recognition, the leased asset is measured at an amount equal to the lower of its fair value and the present value of the minimum lease payments. Subsequent to initial recognition, the asset is accounted for in accordance with the accounting policy applicable to the asset. Other leases are classified as operating leases and the leased assets are not recognized in the Bezeq Group’s statement of financial position. Payments made under operating leases are recognized in profit or loss on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.

 

Determining whether an arrangement contains a lease: At inception or upon reassessment of an arrangement, the Bezeq Group determines whether such an arrangement is or contains a lease. An arrangement is a lease or contains a lease if the following two criteria are met: (1) The fulfillment of the arrangement is dependent on the use of a specific asset or assets; and (2) The arrangement contains rights to use the asset. If, in accordance with these terms, the Bezeq Group determines that the agreement does not contain a lease, the agreement is accounted for as a service agreement and payments for the service are recognized in profit or loss on a straight line basis, over the service period.

 

Right of use of capacities

 

Transactions for acquiring an indefeasible right of use (IRU) of submarine communication cable capacities are mostly accounted for as service transactions. The prepaid expense is amortized on a straight-line basis as stated in the agreement, but for no longer than the expected estimated useful life of those capacities. Identifiable capacities which serve Bezeq exclusively meet the definition of a finance lease and are recognized in property, plant and equipment. The asset is depreciated on a straight-line basis as stated in the agreement, but for no longer than the expected estimated useful life of those capacities.

Inventory

 

Inventories are measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value. The cost of inventories is based on the moving average method. The inventories of a subsidiary include terminal equipment and accessories intended for sale and service, as well as spare parts used for repairs in the repair service it provides to its customers. Slow-moving inventory of terminal equipment, accessories and spare parts are stated net of the provision for impairment.

96

 

Impairment

 

Non-derivative financial assets. The Bezeq Group tests a financial asset for impairment when objective evidence indicates that one or more loss events have had a negative effect on the estimated future cash flows of that asset. Significant financial assets are tested for impairment on an individual basis. The remaining financial assets are assessed for impairment collectively, in groups that share similar credit risk characteristics. The financial statements include specific provisions and Group provisions for doubtful debts, which properly reflect, in the estimation of the management, the loss inherent in debts for which collection is in doubt.

 

Non-financial assets. Timing of impairment testing: The carrying amounts of Bezeq Group’s non-financial assets, other than inventory and deferred tax assets are reviewed at each reporting date to determine whether there is any indication of impairment. If any such indication exists, then the recoverable amount of the asset is estimated. The Bezeq Group assesses the recoverable amount of goodwill and brand name once a year, or more frequently if there are indications of impairment.

 

Measurement of recoverable amount: The recoverable amount of an asset or cash-generating unit is the greater of its value in use and fair value less costs to sell. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset or cash-generating unit, for which the estimated future cash flows from the asset or cash-generating unit were not adjusted.

 

Determining cash-generating units: For the purpose of impairment testing, the assets are grouped together into the smallest group of assets that generates cash from continuing use that are largely independent of other assets or groups of assets.

 

Allocation of goodwill to cash-generating units: For purposes of goodwill impairment testing, cash-generating units to which goodwill has been allocated are aggregated so that the level at which impairment testing is performed reflects the lowest level at which goodwill is monitored for internal reporting purposes, but in any event is not larger than an operating segment. Goodwill acquired in a business combination is allocated to cash-generating units that are expected to generate benefits from the synergies of the combination.

 

For purposes of goodwill impairment testing, when the non-controlling interests are initially measured according to their relative share of the acquiree’s net identifiable assets, the carrying amount of the goodwill is adjusted according to the share which The Bezeq Group holds in the cash-generating unit to which the goodwill is allocated.

 

108

Investments in equity-accounted investees. An investment in an associate is tested for impairment when objective evidence indicates that there has been impairment. Goodwill that forms part of the carrying amount of an investment in an associate is not recognized separately, and therefore is not tested for impairment separately.

 

Employee benefits

 

Post-employment benefits. The Bezeq Group has a number of post-employment benefit plans. The plans are usually financed by deposits with insurance companies and they are classified as defined contribution plans and defined benefit plans.

 

Defined contribution plans:plans. A defined contribution plan is a post-employment benefit plan under which the Bezeq Group pays fixed contributions into a separate entity and has no legal or constructive obligation to pay further amounts. The Bezeq Group’s obligations for contributions to defined contribution pension plans are recognized as an employee benefit expense in the statement of income in the periods during which services are rendered by employees.

 

Defined benefit plans:plans. The Bezeq Group’s net obligation in respect of defined benefit pension plans is calculated separately for each plan by estimating the amount of future benefit that employees have earned in return for their service in the current and prior periods. That benefit is presented at its present value and the fair value of any plan assets is deducted. The discount rate is the yield at the reporting date on high quality corporate bonds denominated in NIS and linked to the CPI, that have maturity dates similar to the terms of the Bezeq Group’s obligations. The calculation is performed annually by a qualified actuary. Net interest costs on a defined benefit plan are calculated by applying the discount rate used to measure the defined benefit obligation at the beginning of the annual period to the then-net defined benefit liability. The Bezeq Group elected to recognize the interest costs that were recognized in the statement of income under financing expenses. Re-measurement of the net defined benefit liability comprises actuarial gains and losses and the return on plan assets (excluding interest). Re-measurements are recognized immediately directly in retained earnings through other comprehensive income. When the benefits of a plan are improved or reduced, the portion of the increased benefit relating to past service by employees or the gain or loss from the reduction are recognized immediately in the statement of income when the plan improvement or reduction occurs.

97

 

Other long-term employee benefits. Bezeq Group’s net obligation in respect of long-term employee benefits other than pension plans is the amount of future benefit that employees have earned in return for their service in the current and prior periods. The amount of these benefits is stated at its present value. The discount rate is the yield at the reporting date on high quality corporate bonds denominated in NIS and linked to the CPI, that have maturity dates similar to the terms of the Bezeq Group’s obligations. The calculation is performed using the projected unit credit method. Any actuarial gains or losses are recognized in the statement of income in the period in which they arise.

 

Benefits for early retirement and dismissal. Employment termination benefits are recognized as an expense when the Bezeq Group is committed demonstrably, without realistic possibility of withdrawal, to a formal detailed plan to terminate employment before the normal retirement date. Termination benefits for voluntary redundancies are recognized as an expense if the Bezeq Group has made an offer of voluntary redundancy, it is probable that the offer will be accepted, and the number of acceptances can be estimated reliably.

 

Short-term benefits. Short-term employee benefit obligations are measured on an undiscounted basis and are expensed as the related service is provided. A liability is recognized for the amount expected to be paid under short-term cash bonus or profit-sharing plans if the Bezeq Group has a present legal or constructive obligation to pay this amount as a result of past service provided by the employee and the obligation can be estimated reliably. The employee benefits are classified, for measurement purposes, as short-term benefits or as other long-term benefits depending on the date when the benefits are expected to be to be wholly settled. In the statement of financial position the employee benefits are classified as current benefits or as non-current benefits according to the time the liability is due to be settled.

Share-based payments. The fair value on the grant date of options for Bezeq shares granted to employees is recognized as a salary expense with a corresponding increase in equity over the period during which the employee becomes entitled to the options. The amount recognized as an expense is adjusted to reflect the actual number of share options that are expected to vest. The fair value of the amount payable to employees in respect of share-based payments, which are settled in cash, is recognized as an expense with a corresponding increase in liabilities, over the period that the employees become entitled to payment. The liability is re-measured at each reporting date until the settlement date. Any changes in the fair value of the liability are recognized in the statement of income. The Bezeq Group elected to recognize the changes in fair value of the liabilities under salary expenses.

109

 

Provisions

 

A provision is recognized if, as a result of a past event, the Bezeq Group has a present legal or constructive obligation that can be estimated reliably, and it is probable that an outflow of economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation.

 

Legal claims. Contingent liabilities are accounted for according to IAS 37 and its related provisions. Accordingly, the claims are classified by likelihood of realization of the exposure to risk, as follows:

 

More likely than not-more than 50% probability;

 

Possible-probability higher than unlikely and less than 50%; or

 

Remote-probability of 10% or less.

 

For claims which the Bezeq Group has a legal or constructive obligation as a result of a past event, which are more likely than not to be realized, the financial statements include provisions which, in the opinion of the Bezeq Group, based, among other things, on the opinions of its legal advisers retained in respect of those claims, are appropriate to the circumstances of each case, despite the claims being denied by the Bezeq Group companies. There are also a few legal proceedings, received recently, for which the risks cannot be assessed at this stage, therefore no provisions have been made.

 

Site dismantling and clearing costs. A provision in respect of an obligation to dismantle and clear sites is recognized for those rental agreements where the Bezeq Group has an undertaking to restore the rental property to its original state at the end of the rental period, after dismantling and transferring the site, and restoring it as necessary. The provisions are determined by discounting the expected future cash flows. The carrying amount of the provision is adjusted each period to reflect the time that has passed and is recognized as a financing expense.

 

Warranty.A Bezeq Group subsidiary recognizes a provision for warranty in respect of first-year insurance for cellular handsets. The warranty is limited to technical malfunctions defined by the subsidiary, and does not include a warranty as a result of customer caused damage. However, an asset exists in respect of the manufacturer’s warranty for those handsets, which is limited to technical malfunctions defined by the manufacturer.

 

C.Research and Development, Patents and Licenses

 

We did not engage in any research and development during the last three fiscal years.

 

98

D.Trend Information

 

From 2012 until 2014,The Bezeq experienced a decline in revenues. Bezeq’sGroup’s revenues decreased fromincreased to NIS 10.310.1 billion for the year ended December 31, 2012 to NIS 9.6 billion for the year ended December 31, 2013, decreased further to NIS 9.1 billion (approximately $2.3 billion) for the year ended December 31, 2014. In 2015, Bezeq’s revenues increased2016 due to the first time consolidation of DBS to NIS 10.0 billion (approximately $2.6 billion) for a full year. Revenues were down across the year ended December 31, 2015.

The increaseBezeq Group’s main segments, mainly in revenues in 2015 was primarily due to the consolidation of DBS revenues as of the second quarter of 2015 in the amount of NIS 1.33 billion ($342 million). The increase in revenues is also attributable to the NIS 90 million (approximately $23 million), or 1%, increase in the revenues of the Domestic Fixed-Line Communications segment and increase in the revenues of the International Communications and Internet Services segment of a NIS 74 million (approximately $19 million), or 1%. The increase in the revenues was partially offset by the revenues of the Cellular Communications segment which decreasedsegment. The continued decline in NIS 529 million (approximately $136 million), or 5%, driven by continued increasedoverall revenues reflects the continuing competition in the cellular marketcommunications industry in 2015.Israel.

 

Based on the information which is currently known to the Bezeq Group, theit has forecast for 2016 is as follows:that it will report net profit of approximately NIS 1.4 billion in 2017.

 

-Net profit attributable to shareholders is expected to be approximately NIS 1.4 billion.

-EBITDA is expected to be approximately NIS 4.2 billion.

-The Bezeq Group’s free cash flow is expected to be approximately NIS 2.0 billion.

Bezeq's forecasts are based on its estimates regarding the structure of competition in the telecommunications market and regulation in this sector, the economic situation and accordingly, the Bezeq Group'sGroup’s ability to implement its plans in 2016.2017.

110

 

E.Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

We are not a party to any material off-balance sheet arrangements.In addition, we have no unconsolidated special purpose financing or partnership entities that are likely to create material contingent obligations.

 

F.Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations

 

The following table summarizes our (including Bezeq’s)the Bezeq Group’s) minimum contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of December 31, 20152016 and the effect we expect them to have on our liquidity and cash flow in future periods:

 

Contractual Obligations Payments due by period
(NIS in millions)
  Payments due by period
(NIS in millions)
 
 Total less than 1
year
 1-3 years 3-5 years�� more than 5
years
  Total less than
1 year
 1-3 years 3-5 years more than
5 years
 
                      
Long-term debt obligations (including interest)  16,631   2,704   4,910   3,586   5,431   14,556   2,212   4,352   3,607   4,895 
Operating lease obligations  1,279   370   567   238   104   1,279   370   567   238   104 
Purchase obligations  149   149   -   -   -   149   149   -   -   - 
Other long term obligations  85   78   7   -   -   2   2   -   -   - 
Total  18,143   3,301   5,484   3,824   5,535   16,495   2,733   4,919   3,845   4,999 

 

ITEM 6.DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES

 

A.Directors and Senior Management

 

Set forth below are the name, age, principal position and a biographical description of each of our directors and executive officers:

 

Name Age Position
Our Directors and Senior Management    
Shaul Elovitch 6869 Chairman of the Board of Directors
Or Elovitch 4041 Director
Moshe Rosenthal(1)(2) 4950 External Director
Debbie Saperia(1)(2) 4849 External Director
Benny Gabbay(1)(2) 5051 Director
Doron Turgeman 4849 Chief Executive Officer
Itzik Tadmor 3536 Principal Financial Officer
     
Bezeq Group’s Executive Management    
Stella Handler 5556 Chief Executive Officer of Bezeq
David MizrahiAllon Raveh 46 Chief Financial Officer of Bezeq
Ran Guron 4748 Chief Executive Officer of Pelephone
Moti Elmaliach 5658 Chief Executive Officer of Bezeq International
Ron Eilon 5152 Chief Executive Officer of DBS

 

 

(1)Member of our Audit Committee.

(2)Member of our Compensation Committee.

 

99

At our 20152016 annual general meeting, Messrs. Shaul Elovitch, Or Elovitch and Benny Gabbay were elected to serve as directors until our 20162017 annual general meeting of shareholders. Ms. Debbie Saperia and Mr. Moshe Rosenthal each serves as an external director pursuant to the provisions of the Israeli Companies Law for three-year terms until January 2017, and November 2016 respectively.June 2019. There are no family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers, apart from Mr. Or Elovitch, who is the son of Mr. Shaul Elovitch, our chairman of the board. On May 3, 2015, we appointed Itzik Tadmor as our new Principal Financial Officer, replacing Ehud Yahalom, the prior CFO who was with the company for the previous four years. Gil Sharon, CEO of Pelephone, resigned in October 2015 after serving for 10 years, following his nomination as CEO of Discount Investment Corporation. He was replaced by Ran Guron, who previously served as Bezeq’s deputy CEO. David Mizrahi, former CFO of Bezeq, notified Bezeq on April 4, 2016 that he will bewas resigning to pursue other opportunities. A search to fill the CFO role is underway, and Mr. Mizrahi will continue as Bezeq’s CFOopportunities, but would remain until a successor is named.replacement was found. Mr. Allon Raveh assumed the position of CFO of the Bezeq in October 2016.

111

 

Our Directors

 

Shaul Elovitch has served as the chairman of our board of directors since March 2000 and as chairman of Internet Gold since its inception in 1992. Mr. Elovitch is the controlling shareholder of Eurocom Communications and its affiliated companies, one of Israel’s largest private communications groups. Mr. Elovitch has served as the chairman of the board of directors and chief executive officer of Eurocom Holdings (1979) Ltd. (“Eurocom Holdings”) and Eurocom Communications, the parent company of Internet Gold, since 1985. Mr. Elovitch also serves as the chairman of the board of directors of Bezeq and as a director and chairman of various companies of the Bezeq Group and the Eurocom Group. Mr. Elovitch also serves as a member of the board of directors of Space Communications Ltd., Satcom Systems Ltd., and other various companies of the Eurocom Group. Mr. Elovitch is the father of Mr. Or Elovitch, a director.

 

Or Elovitchhas served as a director since March 2012. Mr. Elovitch has served as the chief executive officer of Eurocom Communications, our controlling shareholder, through its controlling interest in our parent company, Internet Gold, since August 2011. Prior thereto and from 2006, Mr. Elovitch served as Eurocom Communications’ Executive Vice President of Business Affairs and Investments. Mr. Elovitch also serves as the chairman of the board of directors of Space Communication Ltd., Satcom Systems Ltd. and Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd., companies publicly traded on the TASE and within the Eurocom Group. Mr. Elovitch also serves as a director in various companies within the Eurocom Group, such as Bezeq and subsidiaries of Bezeq. Mr. Elovitch holds a B.A. degree in Business Administration from The College of Management, Tel Aviv and an M.B.A. degree from Baruch College of The City University of New York. Mr. Elovitch is the son of Mr. Shaul Elovitch, the chairman of our board of directors.

 

Benny Gabbay has served as an independent director since August 2013 and is a member of our audit and compensation committees. Since 2002, Mr. Gabbay has served as the chief executive officer of Ofek Semiconductors Ltd., a global importer and exporter of semiconductors. Prior to that and from 1996, Mr. Gabbay served as a senior manager at Iridium Data Ltd. From 1994 to 1996, Mr. Gabbay was a manager at Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer, a member of Ernst & Young Global. Since 2010, Mr. Gabbay has also been a partner in a real estate development initiative in the United States and serves as the chairmen of the board of Novolap Medical Ltd., a biotechnology company. Mr. Gabbay is a certified public accountant in Israel and holds a B.A. degree in Economics and Accounting from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Mr. Gabbay also serves as an independent director of Copperline Americas Limited, a U.S. company that raises bonds in the Israeli stock market since August 2015 in Copperline Americas Limited.2015. Since November 2016 Mr. Gabbay has been as an external director at Dor Alon Energy Israel (1988).

 

Moshe Rosenthal has served as an external director since November 2010 and is a member of our audit and compensation committees. Mr. Rosenthal has been leading an Israeli initiative for composting organic waste as part of his role as Vice President, Business Development of Agrolan Ltd. In addition, Mr. Rosenthal, an attorney, advises leading Israeli fashion brands regarding their legal affairs and business development. From 2003 to 2009, Mr. Rosenthal founded and served as the chief executive officer of WomenOnly, a chain of stores in Israel for women’s intimate apparel that was subsequently acquired by Eveden Ltd., a UK company and leader in the intimate apparel market. From 1996 to 2003, Mr. Rosenthal served as the chief executive officer of Rosenthal Import, Export and Marketing Ltd., which was a leading importer to Israel of women’s intimate apparel. From 1995 to 1998, Mr. Rosenthal was an attorney at Avshalom Leshem-Law Offices. Mr. Rosenthal holds an LL.B degree from Bar Ilan University.

 

Debbie Saperia has served as an external director since January 2008 and is a member of our audit and compensation committees. Since June 2011, Ms. Saperia has also served as a director of FIBI Holdings Ltd. Ms. Saperia has served as the general manager of Yarden Nahara Ltd., a private company that is engaged in the marketing and sale of products to Evangelical Christians since 2005. Ms. Saperia is a consultant for Jones Lang LaSalle, which is involved in global commercial real estate. From 1993 to 1999, Ms. Saperia was an associate at Rosensweig & Co-Law Offices. From 2000 to 2004, Ms. Saperia served as the business development manager of Promedico Limited and served as a director of a number of companies within the Promedico group. From 2001 to 2004, Ms. Saperia served as director and general manager of Vitamedic (1999) Limited. Ms. Saperia holds an LL.B (Hons.) degree from the University of Manchester.

 

100

Our Senior Management

 

Doron Turgeman has served as our chief executive officer since October 2011. Mr. Turgeman also serves as the chief executive officer of Internet Gold and as the chief financial officer of Eurocom Communications.Gold. Previously, Mr. Turgeman served as our and Internet Gold’s Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of Finance and served as a member of our board of directors from January 2008 to February 2010. Mr. Turgeman serves as a director of several other companies within the Eurocom group, including Phoenix Data Pte. Ltd., Barclay Associates Corporation, and Barclay Associates (S) Pte. Ltd. Mr. TurgemanHe also serves as a director of XTL Biopharmaceuticals Ltd. (NASDAQ: XTLB, TASE: XTL), Klein International Group Limited and MDG Real Estate Global Limited .Limited. Mr. Turgeman holds a B.A. degree in Economics and Accounting from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and is a certified public accountant in Israel.

 

112

Itzik Tadmorhas served as our company’s Principal Financial Officer since May 2015. Mr. Tadmor has beenserved as our company'scompany’s controller for the past three years.from September 2011 until May 2015. Prior to joining our company, he worked at PriceWaterhouseCoopers (PwC) for five years. Mr. Tadmor received a Bachelor'sBachelor’s Degree in Accounting and Economics and an M.B.A. degree from Tel-Aviv University. Mr. Tadmor is also a Certified Public Accountant in Israel.

 

Bezeq Group’s Executive Management of the Bezeq Group

 

Stella Handler was appointed as the chief executive officer of Bezeq on April 14, 2013. Ms. Handler has held several senior positions in Israel’s communications sector, among them as chairperson of HOT from May 2011 until January 2013 and chief executive officer of our company (then known as 012 Golden Lines) from 2003 until January 2010. Ms. Handler holds B.A. and M.A. degrees in Economics as well as an M.B.A. from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

 

David MizrahiAllon Raveh has servedwas appointed as Bezeq’s deputy chief executive officer andthe chief financial officer since January 2013. Previously, from 2007 until December 2012,of Bezeq in October 2016. Mr. Mizrahi servedRaveh has held senior positions in the Ofer Group, first as Vice President, EconomicsVP Business Development of Israel Corporation, then as CFO of ZIM Shipping Services, and Budgetsmost recently as CFO of Bezeq.XT Holdings and Shipping (formerly “Ofer Shipping” and “Ofer Group Holdings”). Prior to these posts, Mr. MizrahiRaveh spent six years with Paz Oil and the Bino Group, where he held such positions as CFO and VP Business Development. Mr. Raveh is a certified public accountant as well as a certified attorney and started out with Prof. Itzhak Swary & Co. He holds a B.A.Master’s degree in EconomicsFinance, cum laude, from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.London Business School, and a Bachelor’s degree in Accounting and Law, cum laude, from Tel Aviv University.

 

Ran Guronhas served as the chief executive officer of Pelephone since November 2015. Previously, he served as the Deputy CEO and VP Marketing of Bezeq from March 2011 to October 2015. Before becoming Deputy CEO at Bezeq, he was VP Marketing – CMO at Bezeq for 5 years. From 2003 to 2005 Mr. Guron was VP Marketing at 013 Barak (currently 013 Netvision Ltd.) He serves as Mentor for Microsoft Ventures Accelerator Tel-Aviv program for startups. Mr. Guron is the founder of the Yair Guron Memorial Scholarship R&D Fund in the Arava region. Mr. Guron holds an M.B.A. degree and a B.A. degree in Economics and Business Administration from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

 

Moti Elmaliachhas served as the chief executive officer of Bezeq International since May 2014. He served as the CEO of Eurocom Digital Communications, which markets the Panasonic brands and products in Israel, from 2006 to 2014. Prior to that, he was the chief executive officer of the communications companies Telit Ltd. and Elgadphone Ltd. Mr. Elmaliach also serves on the board of directors of Satcom Systems Ltd., and is the Chairman of DM (3000) Engineering Ltd., a Eurocom Group communications company, and Tafnit Discount Ltd., an investment company. Mr. Elmaliach holds a B.Sc. degree in Industrial Engineering and an M.B.A. degree from Tel Aviv University.

 

Ron Eilon has served as the chief executive officer of DBS since August 2006. Mr. Eilon served as chief financial officer of Bezeq from 2003 to 2005 and as deputy chief executive officer of Bezeq from 2005 to 2006. From 1999 until 2002, he was the chief financial officer of Mirs. Mr. Eilon holds a B.A. degree in Economics and an M.B.A. degree from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

 

B.Compensation

 

We have two executive officers, Doron Turgeman, our chief executive officer and Itzik Tadmor, our principal financial officer, and seven directors. Other than such officers, we have three additional employees who are engaged in management, financial and administrative activities. The aggregate direct compensation we paid to our directors and executive officers as a group (9(9 persons) for the year ended December 31, 20152016 was NIS 1.8 million (approximately $460,000). This amount includes directors compensation and expenses related to salaries, but does not include expenses such as business travel, professional and business association dues and expenses reimbursed to officers and other fringe benefits commonly reimbursed or paid by companies in Israel. As of December 31, 2015,2016, no amount was reserved for pension, retirement, recreation payments and vacation or similar benefits for our directors and executive officers.

We have entered into an arrangement with Internet Gold according to which our employees, including our chief executive officer and the principal financial officer, will provide services to both companies. We are responsible for two-thirds of their compensation expenses and Internet Gold will be responsible for one-third of their compensation.

101

 

For so long as we qualify as a foreign private issuer, we are not required to comply with the proxy rules applicable to U.S. domestic companies, including the requirement to disclose information concerning the amount and type of compensation paid to our chief executive officer and principal financial officer, rather than on an aggregate, basis. Nevertheless, a recent amendment to the regulations promulgated under the Israeli Companies Law requires us to disclose the annual compensation of our five most highly compensated officers (or all the named executive officers if there are less than five) on an individual basis, rather than on an aggregate basis, as was previously permitted for Israeli public companies listed overseas. Under the Companies Law regulations, this disclosure is required to be included in the notice of our annual meeting of shareholders each year or in a public document that accompanies such notice, which we furnish to the SEC under cover of a Report of Foreign Private Issuer on Form 6-K. The Companies Law regulations permit us to refer to a report filed pursuant to the laws of the country in which our shares are listed for trading that includes the required information in lieu of its inclusion in the notice of annual meeting. Because of that disclosure requirement under Israeli law, we are including such information in this annual report, pursuant to the disclosure requirements of Form 20-F.

 

113

The following table includes information for the year ended December 31, 20152016 concerning compensation for our Named Executive Officers. All amounts are in US dollars:

 

Doron Turgeman

(Chief Executive Officer)1

Itzik Tadmor

(Principal Financial Officer) 2

Annual fixed salaryNIS 536,160  plus VAT (linked to the Israeli consumer price index)

NIS 165,000

Retention Bonus (treated as salary costs in the company’s financial statements).

Up to NIS 1 million in the event that Mr. Turgeman stays with our company until the end of 2015. That bonus was paid to Mr. Turgeman at the beginning of 2016.
Annual and special Bonus (treated as salary costs in the company’s financial statements).An annual bonus of up to NIS 89,360.3 For 2015, Mr. Turgeman  received a bonus of NIS 8,936.   NIS 35,000 which has been paid to Itzik at the beginning of 2016 (paid by us only).
Car Expenses, including lease costs, gas and maintenance, provided to the officers (treated as management and general costs in our company’s financial statements).NIS 58,400  plus VATNIS 25,622 plus VAT
  Doron Turgeman
(Chief Executive Officer)
  

Itzik Tadmor

(Principal Financial Officer)1

 
Annual fixed salary  240,000   74,125 
Retention Bonus(treated as salary costs in the company’s financial statements).  104,000   4,300 
Annual and special Bonus(treated as salary costs in the company’s financial statements).  30,000   7,800 
Car Expenses,including lease costs, gas and maintenance, provided to the officers (treated as management and general costs in our company’s financial statements).  15,000   9,300 

 

 

(1)

We have entered into an arrangement with Eurocom Communications and Internet Gold according to which Mr. Turgeman will provide management services to us, Internet Gold and Eurocom Communications. Each of Eurocom Communications, us and Internet Gold will pay 33% of Mr. Turgeman’s management services costs.

(2)Mr. Tadmor’s compensation cost is divided equally between us and Internet Gold.
(3)The variable portion of Mr. Turgeman’s compensation is an annual bonus of up to two months’ salary, according to a bonus plan with milestones which will be effective for three years ending December 31, 2015:2018:

 

 (a)50%35% of the bonus will be paid if the effective financing ratio (finance expenses divided by the total debt) will be 95% or lowerour company’s securities are traded higher than the expected financing ratiobenchmarks for thatthe respective year, accordingbut only an increase of at least 5% higher than the benchmark will entitle Mr. Turgeman to the planned budget approved by our Board of Directors.bonus;
 (b)40%35% of the bonus will be paid ifour company or one of itsour publicly traded debentures receives a higher rating from a recognized credit rating agency, compared to the rating given in the previous year by the rating agency. The creditA positive change in the rating is an acceptable and essential measurementoutlook will entitle Mr. Turgeman to half ofour company’s financial strength and flexibility over the long term. this bonus component;
 (c)10%
.

(c)

15% of the bonus will be paid if ourthe company’s securities’ trading volume increases at least 20% higher than the previous year, on average; and
(d)15% of the bonus will be paid if the company duly files its financial reports and its annual reports with the SEC within the time schedule set by the Board of Directors and in an appropriate manner.

 

In June 2015, our shareholders approved a special one-time cash bonus of NIS 500,000 for Mr. Doron Turgeman, our Chief Executive Officer, in recognition of his significant role and contribution to the successful consummation of our $800 million offering of 7⅜% Senior Secured Notes, which was completed in February 2014.

114

During the year ended December 31, 2015, we paidWe currently pay to each of our external directors, as well as to our independent director, annual fees of annual fees of NIS 52,500 (approximately $13,455)70,000 (currently equivalent to approximately $18,000) and a per meeting attendance fee of NIS 1,860 (approximately $476). Such2,500 (currently equivalent to approximately $650).Such fees are paid based on the “Fixed” fees set forth in regulations promulgated under the Israeli Companies Law. According to the regulations, an external director (and our independent director) is entitled to 60% of the per meeting fee if he or she participated in the meeting by means of communication and not in person, and to 50% of the per meeting fee if resolutions were approved in writing, without convening a meeting. Our other non-employee directors do not receive compensation for their services on our board of directors or any committee of our board of directors. All of our non-employee directors are reimbursed for their expenses for each meeting of the board of directors and audit committee attended.

 

102

In addition, our internal auditor, who is also deemed to be an "officer"“officer” in accordance with the Israeli Companies Law, received approximately NIS28,800 for his services in 2015.2016. Such costs are treated as management and general costs in our financial statements.

 

C.Board Practices

Board of Directors

 

According to the Israeli Companies Law-1999, or the Israeli Companies Law, and our articles of association, the management of our business is vested in our board of directors. Our board of directors may exercise all powers and take all actions that are not specifically granted to our shareholders. Our executive officers are responsible for our day-to-day management and have individual responsibilities established by our chief executive officer and the board of directors. Executive officers are appointed by and serve at the discretion of our board of directors, subject to any applicable agreements.

Election of Directors

 

Our articles of association provide for a board of directors consisting of no less than two and no more than ten directors or such other number as may be determined from time to time at a general meeting of shareholders. Our current board of directors consists of five directors.

 

In accordance with our articles of association and the Israeli Companies Law, all of our directors (other than our external directors) are elected at annual meetings of our shareholders, which are required to be held at least once during every calendar year and not more than 15 months after the last preceding meeting. Except for our external directors, our directors are elected by a vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power represented and voting at such meeting and hold office until the next annual meeting of shareholders following the annual meeting at which they were appointed. The general meeting of shareholders may remove any director from office, other than an external director, by an ordinary resolution, subject to applicable law. Our board of directors may temporarily fill vacancies in the board of directors until the next general meeting at which directors are appointed, provided that the total number of directors does not exceed the maximum number permitted under our articles of association. The board of directors is entitled to remove from office any director appointed by it.

 

The board of directors of an Israeli public company is required to determine that at least one or more directors will have “accounting and financial expertise,” as defined by regulations promulgated under the Israeli Companies Law. Our board of directors determined, accordingly, that at least two directors must have “accounting and financial expertise.” Our Board of Directors has further determined that Messrs. Shaul Elovitch, Moshe Rosenthal, Or Elovitch and Benny Gabbay have the requisite “accounting and financial expertise.”

 

As a controlled company within the meaning of the NASDAQ Stock Market Rules, we are exempt from the NASDAQ requirement regarding the nomination process of directors, and instead, follow Israeli law and practice, in accordance with which directors may be recommended by our board of directors for election by our shareholders. See Item 16G. “Corporate Governance - NASDAQ Exemptions for a Controlled Company.”

 

Potential Conflicts of Interest

Some of our directors also serve in various capacities for entities affiliated with Eurocom Communications and its affiliates. These relationships may give rise to conflicts of interest from time to time relating to (i) contracts, (ii) corporate opportunities, and (iii) use of directors’ time and expertise. We have not adopted any formal plan or procedures to address such conflicts of interest and intend to review all related party transactions on a case-by-case basis. Under Israeli law, certain approvals are required for related party transactions (see below in this Item 6C. “Directors, Senior Management and Employees - Board Practices - Fiduciary Duties; Approval of Related Party Transactions under Israeli Law”).

External and Independent Directors

External directorsDirectors

 

Under the Israeli Companies Law, companies incorporated under the laws of the State whose shares have been offered to the public are required to appoint at least two external directors. The external directors must meet certain statutory requirements of independence.

 

At least one of the external directors must have “accounting and financial expertise” and any other external director must have “accounting and financial expertise” or “professional qualification,” as such terms are defined by regulations promulgated under the Israeli Companies Law.

103

 

The external directors are elected for their first term of office by shareholders at a general meeting, provided that either:

 

The majority of shares voting on the matter (not including abstentions), including at least a majority of the shares of the non-controlling shareholders (and of shareholders who do not have a personal interest in the election of the external director as a result of their relationship with the controlling shareholder) voting on the matter, vote in favor of the external director; or

115

 

The majority of shares voting on the matter (not including abstentions) vote in favor of the external director and the total number of ordinary shares held by non-controlling shareholders (and of shareholders who do not have a personal interest in the election of the external director as a result of their relationship with the controlling shareholder) that voted against the election of the external director does not exceed 2% of all of the voting rights in the company.

 

In general, external directors serve for a three-year term and may be reelected to two additional three-year terms if one of the following conditions is met:

 

One or more shareholders holding at least 1% of the voting rights in the company nominated the external director for an additional term of office and the appointment was approved by a majority of the shares voting on the matter, not including votes of controlling shareholders or shareholders who have a personal interest in the election of the external director as a result of their relationship with the controlling shareholder; and provided that the total number of shares held by non-controlling persons and by persons who have no personal interest in the appointment of the external director as a result of their relationship with the controlling shareholder, who voted in favor of the election of the nominee, exceeds 2% of the voting rights in the company; or

 

The board of directors proposed the nominee for an additional term of office, and the election was approved by the general meeting of shareholders by the majority required for the election of an external director for a first term of office, as described above.

 

External directors can be removed from office only by the same special percentage of shareholders as can elect them, or by a court, and then only if the external directors cease to meet the statutory qualifications with respect to their appointment or if they violate their duty of loyalty to the company. If an external directorship becomes vacant, the board of directors is required under the Israeli Companies Law to convene a shareholders meeting immediately to appoint a new external director.

 

Each committee of the board of directors that is authorized to exercise powers vested in the board of directors must include at least one external director, and the audit committee and compensation committee must include all the external directors. An external director is entitled to compensation as provided in regulations adopted under the Israeli Companies Law and is otherwise prohibited from receiving any other compensation, directly or indirectly, in connection with such service.

 

Ms. Debbie Saperia and Mr. Moshe Rosenthal will each serve as an external director pursuant to the provisions of the Israeli Companies Law for a three-year term until January 2017,2020, and November 2016,2019, respectively. Ms. Saperia has “professional qualification,” and Mr. Rosenthal has “accounting and financial expertise,” as such terms are defined under the Israeli Companies Law.

 

Independent Directors

 

In general, NASDAQ Stock Market Rules require that a NASDAQ-listed company have a majority of independent directors on its board of directors and its audit committee must consist solely of independent directors, as defined under NASDAQ Stock Market Rules. Because Internet Gold owns more than 50% of our ordinary shares, we are considered a “controlled company” within the meaning of NASDAQ Stock Market Rules. Accordingly, we are exempt from certain requirements under NASDAQ Stock Market Rules, such as the requirement to have a majority of independent directors on our board of directors. If the “controlled company” exemption would cease to be available to us under the NASDAQ Stock Market Rules, we may instead elect to follow Israeli law and would not be required to elect any additional independent directors.

 

Pursuant to the Israeli Companies Law, a director may be qualified as an independent director if such director is either (i) an external director; or (ii) a director who complies with the following requirements: (y) he or she is eligible for nomination as an external director and the audit committee has approved such eligibility; and (z) he or she has not acted as a director of the company for a period exceeding nine consecutive years.

 

104

Our Board of Directors has determined that each of Mr. Moshe Rosenthal and Ms. Debbie Saperia, our external directors under Israeli law, and Mr. Benny Gabbay qualifies as an independent director under the requirements of the SEC, NASDAQ and Israeli law.

116

Audit Committee

 

Under the Israeli Companies Law, the board of directors of any public company must establish an audit committee. The audit committee must consist of at least three directors, must include all of the external directors and must have a majority of independent directors, as such terms are defined in the Israeli Companies Law. The audit committee may not include the chairman of the board of directors, any director employed by the company or by the controlling shareholder of the company or by a company controlled by the controlling shareholder or any director who provides services on a regular basis to the company or the controlling shareholder or a company controlled by a controlling shareholder, or a director that is financially dependent on the controlling shareholder, or a controlling shareholder or any of the controlling shareholder’s relatives.

 

Our audit committee also serves, in compliance with the Israeli Companies Law and Israeli Companies Regulations (Provisions and Conditions regarding the Financial Statements’ Authorization Process), 2010 as the committee of our board of directors that is required to examine our financial statements.

 

In addition, the NASDAQ Stock Market Rules require us to establish an audit committee comprised of at least three members, all of whom must be independent directors, each of whom is financially literate and satisfies the respective “independence” requirements of the SEC and NASDAQ and one of whom has accounting or related financial management expertise at senior levels within a company.

 

Our audit committee assists our Board of Directors in overseeing the accounting and financial reporting processes of our company and audits of our financial statements, including the integrity of our financial statements, compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, our independent registered public accountants’ qualifications and independence, the performance of our internal audit function and independent registered public accountants, finding any defects in the business management of our company and proposing to our Board of Directors ways to correct such defects, approving related-party transactions as required by Israeli law, and such other duties as may be directed by our Board of Directors. The role of our audit committee also includes the determination of whether certain related party transactions are regarded as material, extraordinary, or insignificant, the review of the internal audit program and the operation of the internal auditor, as well as setting procedures for whistleblower protection.

 

Our audit committee consists of three members of our Board of Directors who satisfy the respective “independence” requirements of the SEC, NASDAQ and Israeli law for audit committee members. Our current audit committee members are Mr. Rosenthal (chairperson), Mr. Gabbay and Ms. Saperia, our external directors under Israeli law. Our board of directors has determined that each of Mr. Rosenthal and Mr. Gabbay qualifies as an audit committee financial expert, as defined by rules of the SEC. The audit committee meets at least once each quarter.

 

Compensation Committee

 

Our Board of Directors has established a Compensation Committee consisting of our three external directors (within the meaning of the Israeli Companies Law) who are also the members of our audit committee. The three members satisfy the “independence” requirements of the SEC, NASDAQ and Israeli law for audit committee members. A compensation committee must be comprised of no fewer than three members and must include all of the external directors, whom must also constitute a majority of its members. All other members of the compensation committee must be directors who receive compensation that is in compliance with regulations promulgated under the Israeli Companies Law. In addition, the chairperson of the compensation committee must be an external director. Directors who are not qualified to serve on the audit committee may not serve on the compensation committee.

 

The compensation committee is responsible for: (i) making recommendations to the board of directors with respect to the approval of the compensation policy applicable to the company’s office holders and any extensions thereto. The compensation policy must be based on those considerations, must include those provisions and needs to reference those matters as are detailed in the Israeli Companies Law; (ii) providing the board of directors with recommendations with respect to any amendments or updates to the compensation policy and periodically reviewing the implementation thereof; (iii) reviewing and approving arrangements with respect to the terms of office and employment of office holders; and (iv) determining whether or not to exempt a transaction with a candidate for chief executive officer from shareholder approval.

 

Our Compensation Committee adopted a compensation policy and will be required to approve our compensation policies at least once every three years. The compensation policy was approved by our board of directors, after considering the recommendations of our Compensation Committee, and by our shareholders by a special majority in accordance with the Israeli Companies Law. On June 16, 2016, an amended compensation policy was approved by our shareholders.

105

 

Internal Auditor

 

Under the Israeli Companies Law, the board of directors of a public company must appoint an internal auditor nominated by the audit committee. The role of the internal auditor is, among other things, to examine whether a company’s actions comply with applicable law and orderly business procedure. The internal auditor must meet certain statutory requirements of independence. In determining the ownership or voting interest of a person, Israeli law is expansive and aggregates that person’s direct and indirect holdings, including the holdings of certain affiliates, relatives and associates. Mr.Ilan Chaikin currently serves as our internal auditor.

117

 

Exculpation, Indemnification and Insurance of Directors and Officers

 

Indemnification of Office Holders

 

Under the Israeli Companies Law and the Israeli Securities Law, 5738-1968, or the Israeli Securities Law, a company may, if permitted by its articles of association, indemnify an office holder for any of the following liabilities or expenses that they may incur due to an act performed or failure to act in his or her capacity as the company’s office holder, either pursuant to an undertaking given by the company in advance of the act or following the act:

 

monetary liability imposed on the office holder in favor of a third party in a judgment, including a settlement or an arbitral award confirmed by a court. However, if a company undertakes to indemnify an office holder in advance of such a liability, the undertaking must be limited to foreseeable events based on the company’s activities when the company undertook such indemnification, and to amounts or standards that the board of directors has determined are reasonable under the circumstances;

 

reasonable litigation expenses, including attorneys’ fees, expended by an office holder as a result of an investigation or proceeding instituted against the office holder by a competent authority, provided that such investigation or proceeding concludes without the filing of an indictment against the office holder and either: no financial liability was imposed on the office holder in lieu of criminal proceedings, or a financial liability was imposed on the office holder in lieu of criminal proceedings with respect to an alleged criminal offense that does not require proof of criminal intent;

 

reasonable litigation expenses, including attorneys’ fees, expended by the office holder or for which the office holder is charged by a court:

 

oin an action brought against the office holder by the company, on behalf of the company or on behalf of a third party,

 

oin a criminal action from which the office holder is acquitted, or

 

oin a criminal action in which the office holder is convicted of a criminal offense which does not require proof of criminal intent.

 

a payment that the office holder is obligated to make to an injured party pursuant to Section 52(54)(a)(1)(a) of the Israeli Securities Law, and expenses that the office holder incurred in connection with an administrative proceeding under the Israeli Securities Law, including reasonable litigation expenses and attorney fees.

 

Insurance of Office Holders

 

A company may, if permitted by its articles of association and subject to the conditions set forth in the Israeli Companies Law, obtain insurance for an office holder against liabilities incurred in his or her capacity as an office holder. These liabilities include a breach of duty of care to the company or a third-party, a breach of duty of loyalty and any monetary liability imposed on the office holder in favor of a third-party.

 

In addition, under the Israeli Securities Law, a company may, if permitted by its articles of association, obtain insurance for an office holder against liabilities incurred in his or her capacity as an office holder in connection with a payment that the office holder is obligated to make to an injured party pursuant to Section 52(54)(a)(1)(a) of the Israeli Securities Law, and expenses that the office holder incurred in connection with an administrative proceeding under the Israeli Securities Law, including reasonable litigation expenses and attorney fees.

 

106

Exculpation of Office Holders

 

Under the Israeli Companies Law, a company may, if permitted by its articles of association, also exculpate an office holder from a breach of duty of care in advance of that breach. A company may not exculpate an office holder from a breach of duty of loyalty towards the company or from a breach of duty of care concerning dividend distribution or a purchase of the company’s shares by the company or other entities controlled by the company.

118

 

Limitations on Exculpation, Insurance and Indemnification

 

Under the Israeli Companies Law, a company may indemnify or insure an office holder against a breach of duty of loyalty only to the extent that the office holder acted in good faith and had reasonable grounds to assume that the action would not prejudice the company. In addition, a company may not indemnify, insure or exculpate an office holder against a breach of duty of care if committed intentionally or recklessly (excluding mere negligence), or committed with the intent to derive an unlawful personal gain, or for a fine or forfeit levied against the office holder in connection with a criminal offense. According to the Israeli Administrative Enforcement Law, a company cannot insure or indemnify an office holder for an administrative enforcement procedure, regarding payments to victims of the infringement or for expenses expended by the officer with respect to certain proceedings held concerning him or her, including reasonable litigation expenses and legal fees.

 

Pursuant to the Israeli Companies Law, exculpation of, procurement of insurance coverage for, and an undertaking to indemnify or indemnification of, our office holders must be approved by our Compensation Committee and our Board of Directors and, if the office holder is a director or the chief executive officer, also by our shareholders.

 

Our articles of association allow us to insure, indemnify and exempt our office holders to the fullest extent permitted by law, subject to the provisions of the Israeli Companies Law and Israeli Securities Law. We maintain a directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policy with liability coverage of up to $10 million per claim and in the aggregate. We have undertaken to indemnify all of our directors and officers to the extent permitted by law, in an aggregate amount for all directors and officers not to exceed 25% of our equity (on a consolidated basis) in accordance with the our last financial statements published before the actual payment of the indemnity amount, to the extent that their liability is not covered under our directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policy.

 

D.Employees

 

On December 31, 2015,2016, we hadfive employees who also provided services to Internet Gold. Our direct employees are all located in Israel and are not represented by any labor union. Since our inception, we have not experienced any labor-related work stoppages and believe that our relations with our employees are good. We have entered into an arrangement with Internet Gold according to which our employees will provide services to both companies

As of December 31, 2016, the Bezeq Group employed 11,901 persons, of whom 5,649 persons were employed by Bezeq, 2,594 persons were employed by Pelephone, 1,905 persons were employed by Bezeq International and each company will pay 50% of their compensation. We entered into a similar arrangement with Internet Gold and Eurocom Communications with respect to the management services supplied1,753 persons were employed by Mr. Doron Turgeman to the three companies.DBS.

 

As of December 31, 2015, the Bezeq Group employed 12,615 persons, of whom 5,986 persons were employed by Bezeq, 2,679 persons were employed (or otherwise retained) by Pelephone, 1,966 persons1,966persons were employed by Bezeq International and 1,984 persons were employed by DBS.

 

As of December 31, 2014, the Bezeq Group employed 12,939 persons, of whom 5,964 persons were employed by Bezeq, 3,001 persons were employed (or otherwise retained) by Pelephone, 1,932 persons were employed by Bezeq International and 2,042 persons were employed by DBS.

As of December 31, 2013, the Bezeq Group employed 13,763 persons, of whom 6,576 persons were employed by Bezeq, 2,952 persons were employed (or otherwise retained) by Pelephone, 1,989 persons were employed by Bezeq International and 2,246 persons were employed by DBS.

 

Israeli labor laws and regulations are applicable to our employees. Israeli labor laws govern the length of the workday, minimum wages for employees, procedures for hiring and dismissing employees, determination of severance pay, annual leave, sick days and other conditions of employment. Israeli law generally requires severance pay upon the retirement or death of an employee or termination of employment by our company. For those employees who are entitled to a pension arrangement, we fund future severance pay obligations by contributing to managers’ insurance or other pension arrangements. A provision in our financial statements covers severance pay to those employees who are not entitled to managers’ insurance or other pension arrangements. Furthermore, we and our employees are required to make payments to the National Insurance Institute, which is similar to the U.S. Social Security Administration. Such amounts also include payments by the employee for health insurance.

 

Labor relations with Bezeq’s employees involved in fixed-line communications are regulated by the collective agreements among Bezeq, the workers representatives and the Histadrut, as well as by personal contracts. Additionally, expansion orders to certain general collective agreements apply Bezeq’s employees, such as cost-of-living increment agreements.

 

 119107 

 

 

E.Share Ownership

 

The following table sets forth certain information as of April 18, 2016,26, 2017, regarding the beneficial ownership by each of our directors and directors and executive officers as a group:

 

Name Number of Ordinary Shares Beneficially Owned(1)      Percentage of Ownership(2)   Number of Ordinary Shares Beneficially Owned(1)    Percentage of Ownership(2) 
Shaul Elovitch(3)  19,366,573   64.79%  19,366,573   64.80%
Or Elovitch  7,555     (* )     5,225   (*) 
Benny Gabbay  1,073     (* )     1,073   (*) 
Moshe Rosenthal            
Debbie Saperia            
All directors and executive officers as a group (8 persons)(4)  20,333,861   68%
All directors and executive officers as a group (7 persons)(4)      64.81%

 

* Less than 1%

*Less than 1%

 

(1)Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Ordinary shares relating to options currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of the date of this table are deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of the person holding such securities, but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of any other person. Except as indicated by footnote, and subject to community property laws where applicable, the persons named in the table above have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares shown as beneficially owned by them.

(2)The percentages shown are based on 29,889,045 ordinary shares outstanding (not including 19,230 shares held as treasury stock) as of April 18, 2016.26, 2017.

(3)Mr. Shaul Elovitch, the chairman of our board of directors, is deemed to beneficially own19,366,573,, or 64.79%64.80%, of our ordinary shares as of such date through his controlling interest in Eurocom Communications and through his wife’s direct ownership of our and Internet Gold’s shares.

(4)Includes 800 ordinary shares owned by Mr. Doron Turgeman, our Chief Executive Officer.

 

ITEM 7.MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

 

A.Major Shareholders

 

As of April 18, 2016,26, 2017, Internet Gold, our controlling shareholder, held of record19,363,396 shares,or 64.78% of our outstanding ordinary shares. Eurocom Communications is the controlling shareholder of Internet Gold, holding 63.80%61.14% of its ordinary shares as of April18, 2016. 26, 2017 (including 1,125,000 ordinary shares of Internet Gold that are held directly in a joint account by Shaul and Yossef Elovitch). Eurocom Communications is 99.33% owned by Eurocom Holdings,, which is 80% owned by Mr. Shaul Elovitch. The remaining 0.67% interest in Eurocom Communications is directly owned by Mr. Shaul Elovitch. Mr. Shaul Elovitch holds 80% of Eurocom Holdings’ shares and 75% of Eurocom Holdings’ management shares. Mr. Shaul Elovitch also serves as the chairman of the board of directors of Internet Gold, Eurocom Communications and Eurocom Holdings. Accordingly, Mr. Shaul Elovitch may be deemed to have the sole voting and dispositive power over our ordinary shares beneficially owned by Eurocom Communications. 925,000 ordinary shares of Internet Gold are held directly in a joint account of Shaul and Yossef Elovitch.

 

Mr. Shaul Elovitch may also deem to be the beneficial owner of 26,893 ordinary shares of Internet gold held of record by his wife, Mrs. Iris Elovitch. As well as shares of Internet gold 8,300 shares of Internet gold that are held by other family members of Mr. Shaul Elovitch.

 

120

The following table sets forth certain information as of April18, 2016 26, 2017 regarding the beneficial ownership by all shareholders known to us to own beneficially 5% or more of our ordinary shares:

 

Name Number of
Ordinary
Shares
Beneficially
Owned(1)
  Percentage
of
Ownership(2)
 
Internet Gold(3)  19,363,396   64.78%

 

 

(1)Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Ordinary shares relating to options currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of the date of this table are deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of the person holding such securities, but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of any other person. Except as indicated by footnote, and subject to community property laws where applicable, the persons named in the table above have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares shown as beneficially owned by them.

108

(2)The percentages shown are based on 29,889,045 ordinary shares outstanding (not including 19,230 shares held as treasury stock) as of April18, 2016. 26, 2017.

(3)As of April18, 2016, 26, 2017, Internet Gold, our controlling shareholder, held of record19,363,396,, or 64.78%, of our outstanding ordinary shares. Eurocom Communications, the controlling shareholder of Internet Gold, holds 63.80%61.14% of Internet Gold’s ordinary shares.shares (including 1,125,000 ordinary shares of Internet Gold that are held directly in a joint account by Shaul and Yossef Elovitch). As of April 18, 2016,26, 2017, Eurocom Communications is 99.33% owned by Eurocom Holdings.Holdings. The remaining 0.67% interest in Eurocom Communications is directly owned by Mr. Shaul Elovitch. Mr. Shaul Elovitch holds 80% of Eurocom Holdings’ shares and 75% of Eurocom Holdings’ management shares. Mr. Shaul Elovitch also serves as the chairman of the board of directors of Internet Gold, Eurocom Communications and Eurocom Holdings. Accordingly, Mr. Shaul Elovitch may be deemed to have the sole voting and dispositive power over our ordinary shares beneficially owned by Eurocom Communications. Mr. Shaul Elovitch may also be deemed to be the beneficial holder of 3,177 ordinary shares held of record by his wife Mrs. Iris Elovitch and 26,893 ordinary shares of Internet Gold held of record by Mrs. Iris Elovitch. In addition, Or Elovitch, a director of the issuer, and the son of Shaul Elovitch, holds 5,225 shares of the issuer and 8,300 shares of Internet Gold are held by other family members of Mr. Shaul Elovitch. Internet Gold filed a Schedule 13D/A filed with the SEC on January 20, 2016.

 

Significant Changes in the Ownership of Major Shareholders

 

On February 14, 2013, Clal Insurance Enterprises Holdings Ltd. filed Amendment No. 4 to Schedule 13G reflecting ownership of less than 5% of our ordinary shares.

On June 27, 2013, Internet Gold sold 3,571,741, or 12.0% of our ordinary shares to Norisha Holdings Limited, a company organized under the laws of the British Virgin Islands. On June 27, 2013, Internet Gold reported the sale of such shares and its holdings of 20,320,256, or 68% of our ordinary shares. On June 28, 2013, Norisha Holdings Limited, a company organized under the laws of the British Virgin Islands, filed a Schedule 13G to the same effect.

On June 2, 2013, Altshuler Shaham Ltd., or Altshuler Shaham, filed a Schedule 13G reflecting ownership of 1,968,709, or 6.6%, of our ordinary shares. On February 13, 2013, Altshuler Shaham filed Amendment No. 1 to its Schedule 13G reflecting ownership of 2,865,939, or 9.6%, of our ordinary shares. On March 11, 2015, Altshuler Shaham filed Amendment No. 2 to its Schedule 13G reflecting ownership of 1,996,903, or 6.7%, of our ordinary shares. On June 9, 2016, Altshuler Shaham have reportedfiled Amendment No. 3 to us that they recently sold their remainderits Schedule 13G reflecting ownership of 127,266, or 0.4%, of our ordinary shares.

 

On March 26, 2014, Norisha Holdings Limited reported that as of March 20, 2014, it no longer held any ordinary shares in our company. It had previously reported that it held 12.0% of our ordinary shares as of June 27, 2013.

On May 29, 2014, Internet Goldagreed to transfer 396,860 ordinary shares of our company to Norisha Holdings Limited as “adjustment shares,” based on the terms of its June 2013 transaction with Norisha. Internet Gold had previously reported that it held 20,320,256, or 68%, of our ordinary shares.

On June 17, 2014, Internet Gold purchased 15,000 of our ordinary shares and on January 13, 2016, Internet Goldit sold 575,000 of our ordinary shares. It filedInternet Gold reported that it held 19,363,396, or 64.78% of our ordinary shares in a Schedule 13D/A filed on January 14, 2016 to reflect these transactions that took place in Israel.2016.

 

Major Shareholders Voting Rights

 

Our major shareholders do not have different voting rights.

 

Record Holders

Based on a review of the information provided to us by our transfer agent and other information available to the company, as of April18, 2016, 25, 2017, one record holder holding approximately27.6% 28% of our outstanding ordinary shares had a registered address in the United States. Such numbers are not representative of the portion of our shares held in the United States nor are they representative of the number of beneficial holders residing in the United States, since such ordinary shares were held of record by one U.S. nominee company, CEDE & Co. According to the information available to us, weWe believe that we have approximately 287300 beneficial holders in the United States.States at such date.

121

 

B.Related Party Transactions

 

We receive and provide various services and products to and from related parties at market rates and in the ordinary course of business. Other than the transactions described below, none of our related party transactions are material to us or to our related parties. If a related party wishes to supply products or services to us, we generally obtain a bid from a third party to enable us to determine whether the related party’s bid is on arm’s-length terms. Any of such transaction is subject to the approval of our audit committee and our board of directors (and in some instances, our shareholders). In addition, generally we will not purchase a particular type of product or service solely from related parties, but will also have non-related vendors. Prices offered by non-related vendors are compared to those offered by related parties to ensure that the related parties are offering arm’s length terms.

 

In the ordinary course of business, some of our subsidiaries and affiliates engage in business activities with each other. Such business activities are primarily among Bezeq, other Bezeq Group companies and other Eurocom Group companies, such as Eurocom Digital, Eurocom Cellular, Spacecom, Satcom, and to a lesser extent other affiliated companies. Such business activities primarily relate to the provision, purchase or sale of communications and digital services and products, including the provision of satellite or broadcasting services, cellular and electronic products and equipment, and Internet and telephony services. The transactions among these related parties are made at prices and on terms equivalent to those charged in transactions with unrelated parties under similar conditions.

109

 

Agreements with the Eurocom Group and Internet Gold

 

We have entered into a registration rights agreement with Internet Gold granting it the right to register our ordinary shares it owns under the U.S. Securities Act. Under the registration rights agreement, we have granted to Internet Gold “demand” registration rights that allow it, at any time after one year following the consummation of our initial public offering in October 2007, to request that we register under the U.S. Securities Act some or all of our ordinary shares it owns. Internet Gold is entitled to an aggregate of five demand registrations. We are not required to effect any demand registration unless such demand registration request is for a number of ordinary shares that have a market value of at least $7.5 million. We are also not required to effect more than one demand registration during any 12-month period thereafter. We are not obligated to grant a request for a demand registration within 90 days of any other demand registration. Internet Gold also has “piggyback” registration rights that allow it to include our ordinary shares it owns in any public offering of equity securities initiated by us (other than those public offerings pursuant to registration statements on Forms F-4, S-8 or any other successor forms). We have also granted Internet Gold the right to request a shelf registration on Form F-3, provided that we shall be eligible to utilize a registration statement on such form, providing for an offering to be made on a continuous basis but for no longer than one year without the consent of our audit committee. Under the registration rights agreement we have agreed to indemnify Internet Gold against any losses or damages resulting from any untrue statement or omission of material fact in any registration statement or prospectus pursuant to which they sell ordinary shares, unless such liability arose in reliance upon and in strict conformity with information furnished in writing from Internet Gold. We will pay all expenses incident to any demand registration, and Internet Gold will pay its respective portions of all underwriting discounts, commissions and fees attributable to the sale of our ordinary shares it owns under the registration rights agreement.

 

In February 2008, we entered into an execution services agreement with Eurocom Capital Finance Ltd. (“Eurocom Capital”), which is controlled by Mr. Shaul Elovitch, our controlling shareholder and the chairman of our board of directors, under which Eurocom Capital provides us with various financial services. Under the agreement, Eurocom Capital handles the execution of our financial investments pursuant to direct instructions from our Chief Executive Officer, which is based on a policy that was established by our management and approved by our board of directors. In consideration for these services, we agreed to pay Eurocom Capital fees which are customary for such agreements and on market terms. We paid Eurocom Capital aggregate fees of approximately NIS 513,000,560,000, NIS 560,000604,000 and NIS 604,000288,000 (approximately $155,000$75,000) for its services in 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2015,2016, respectively.

We have entered into an arrangement with Eurocom Communications and Internet Gold, according to which Mr. Turgeman provides management services to us, Internet Gold and Eurocom Communications. In consideration for such services, each of Eurocom Communications, Internet Gold and us will pay 33% of Mr. Turgeman’s services costs.

 

We and Internet Gold together lease our principal offices from Eurocom Communications for an annual rent of NIS 59,000 (approximately $15,000) for each company. In addition, Eurocom Real Estate Ltd. provides us and Internet Goldboth companies with parking spaces for NIS 8,000 (approximately $2,000) a year for each company. Eurocom Digital provides us and Internet Gold with additional services, such as computing services for an annual fee of NIS 12,000 (approximately $3,000) for each company. All of these expenses are divided one-third to Internet Gold and two-thirds to us.

 

In addition, Also, we have entered into an arrangement with Internet Gold according to which our employees, including our chief executive officer and the principal financial officer, provide services to both companies. We are responsible for two-thirds of their compensation expenses and Internet Gold is responsible for one-third of their compensation.

Eurocom Communications Ltd. also provides our companyus and Internet Gold with legal services in consideration of an annual sum of NIS 96 thousand96,000 for each company.

122

 

Bezeq Group Interested Party Guidelines

 

In March 2011, Bezeq’s board of directors adopted guidelines and regulations to classify a transaction by Bezeq, any of its subsidiaries or affiliates of Bezeq with an interested party as an “insignificant transaction,” which is not an “extraordinary transaction,” as set out in the Israeli Securities Regulations (Annual Financial Statements), 2010. These guidelines and regulations are used to examine the scope of disclosure in periodic reports, prospectuses (including shelf offering reports) and immediate reports regarding a transaction of Bezeq, a company under its control and a subsidiary or affiliate of Bezeq with a controlling shareholder or in which the controlling shareholder has a personal interest.

 

From time to time, Bezeq and its subsidiaries or affiliates enter into “insignificant transactions,” which are not extraordinary transactions, with an interested party in Bezeq or with related parties, including transactions for the sale or purchase of products and services, such as communication products and services, including fixed-line and cellular telephony handsets, software development products and services, maintenance services, voice-mail service agreements, rental transactions of real estate properties and advertising services.

110

 

In the absence of special, qualitative considerations under the specific circumstances, a transaction that is in Bezeq’s regular course of business, is carried out in accordance with market conditions and has no material effect on the Bezeq Group, is deemed “insignificant” if all the following parameters exist:

 

The amount of the transaction does not exceed NIS 10 million;

 

Bezeq is not required to issue an immediate report for the transaction under applicable law; and

 

The transaction does not involve employment terms (within the meaning of the Israeli Companies Law) of an interested party or any relative thereof.

 

According to the Israeli Companies Law, Bezeq’s audit committee will review the parameters set out above and the need to update them on a yearly basis, prior to the publication of Bezeq’s reports. Bezeq’s board of directors may, from time to time and at its discretion, amend the parameters for an “insignificant transaction.” In general, each transaction is tested separately for “insignificance.” Nevertheless, separate transactions that are part of the same continuing transaction or very similar transactions that are carried out routinely and repeatedly, will be tested as one transaction on an annual basis for “insignificance,” provided the scope of the transaction does not exceed NIS 10 million. In 2010, 2011 and 2012, the Bezeq Group entered into “insignificant transactions” with related parties of Bezeq Group or entities in which its controlling shareholder has a personal interest as described above.

 

In accordance with a recent amendment to the Israeli Companies Law, Bezeq’s audit committee has determined that transactions of Bezeq or its subsidiaries with Bezeq’s controlling shareholders or in which Bezeq’s controlling shareholders have a personal interest, must be approved following a competitive process, which includes approaching three competitors that provide a similar service or product (subject to certain exceptions). The audit committee has determined standards for conducting such competitive process and certain types of transactions for which a different approval procedure shall apply.

 

Bezeq Group Transactions Deemed to be Significant

 

Item  Approval date of the general meeting (after approval of Bezeq'sthe Bezeq’s audit committee and Board of Directors), unless otherwise stated. Nature of the transaction Amount of the transaction
(1) Nature of the personal interest
April 25, 2013
Approved by Bezeq's Board of Directors in accordance with the Companies Regulations (Relief in Transactions with Interested Parties), 2000 ("the Relief Regulations for Transactions with Interested Parties")
Extension of the arrangements approved at Bezeq's general meeting on October 14, 2010, between Bezeq and DBS and between Bezeq International and DBS for reciprocal marketing of products and services until December 31, 2015The fees to be paid by the parties to each other will be in accordance with the criteria approved by the general meeting as part of the original approval for the agreementSection B below

123

Approval date of the general meeting (after approval of Bezeq's audit committee and Board of Directors), unless otherwise stated.Nature of the transactionAmount of the transactionNature of the personal interest
May 8, 2013 Approval of Bezeq'sBezeq’s vote at the general meeting of DBS in favor of DBS'sDBS’s agreement with Space Communications Ltd. ("(“Space Communications"Communications”) for leasing space segments, in which the original agreement will be amended and extended. The agreement is valid until the end of 2028.
This agreement was valid in the reporting year and up to December 31, 2016. On February 12, 2017 and February 14, 2017, Bezeq’s audit committee and board of directors, respectively, approved an amendment/addendum to this agreement, which will be presented to the general meeting for approval on April 3, 2017.
 TotalA total amount of up to USD 227 million (netfor the entire agreement period (up to December 31, 2018) net including discounts for satellite segments leased in the existing agreement)Section D below.
(2) 
June 13, 2013 The amendment to Bezeq'sBezeq’s three-year agreement with Eurocom Communications Ltd. ("(“Eurocom Communications"Communications”) for ongoing management and consultation services valid until May 31, 2016, unless one of the parties announces its intention to terminate the agreement with three months’ notice. For further information.This agreement was valid in the reporting year and up to May 31, 2016. NIS 5.5 million per yearSection E below

 111

Item   Approval date of the general meeting (after approval of the Bezeq’s audit committee and Board of Directors), unless otherwise stated. Nature of the transaction Amount of the transaction
(3)November 6, 2013
Approved by Bezeq'sBezeq’s Board of Directors in accordance with the relief regulationsCompanies Regulations (Relief in Transactions with Interested Parties), 2000 (“the Relief Regulations for transactionsTransactions with interested partiesInterested Parties”)
 Amendment and extension of the agreement between DBS and Eurocom Digital Communications Ltd. (“Eurocom”) and Advanced Digital Broadcast SA (“ADB”) for the purchase of YesMaxTotalYesMaxTotal3 converters, for a period up to December 31, 2016. The total cost will be USD 10 million per yearSections  A and B below
(4) 
January 27, 2014Approval of Bezeq's vote at the general meeting of DBS in favor of DBS's agreement with Eurocom and ADB for the acquisition of an additional quantity of yesMaxTotal converters and power supplies for yesMax HD converters, until June 30, 2015.For converters: Total cost of USD 14 million In addition, there is an additional 2.42% of the price for the cost of the hard drive only, if there are changes due to an increase in hard drive prices

For power supplies: a total cost of USD 197 thousand
Sections A and B below
November 27, 2014
Approved by Bezeq's Board of Directors in accordance with the relief regulations for transactions with interested parties
Extension of supplier credit terms in accordance with the agreement between DBS and Space Communications for lease of space segments, up to December 31, 2014.(NIS 874,000).

Section D below.
January 14, 2015Approval of Bezeq's vote at the general meeting of DBS in favor of DBS's agreement with Eurocom and ADB for the order of an additional quantity of yesMaxTotal converters, until December 31, 2015.A total cost of USD 12 million and an additional price of up to 1.9% for the cost of the hard drive only, if there are changes due to an increase in hard drive pricesSections  A and B below

124

Approval date of the general meeting (after approval of Bezeq's audit committee and Board of Directors), unless otherwise stated.Nature of the transactionAmount of the transactionNature of the personal interest
March 23, 2015 Approval of Bezeq'sBezeq’s acquisition agreement with Eurocom DBS Ltd. (“Eurocom DBS”) whereby Bezeq will acquire the entire holdings of Eurocom DBS in DBS shares DBS and all the shareholder loans provided by Eurocom DBS to DBS (including acceptance of the terms established by the Antitrust Commissioner'sCommissioner’s in his approval of the merger on March 26, 2014, both by Bezeq and by DBS, and announcement of the exercise of Bezeq'sBezeq’s option for the allotment of 6,221 DBS shares, at no cost, representing 8.6% of the share capital of DBS). The total cost is comprised of:

A. Total cash of NIS 680 million

B. Total cash of up to NIS 200 million (subject to certain conditions)

C. Total cash of up to NIS 170 million (subject to certain conditions) For information about the conditions relating to B and C, see Note 11.2 above.
(5) Section E below.
October 19, 2015 Approval of Bezeq'sBezeq’s vote at the general meeting of shareholders of DBS in favor of DBS'sDBS’s agreement with Eurocom and ADB for the order of yesMaxTotal3 converters, under the existing agreement, until December 31, 2017 Total cost of USD 14 millionSection  A below
(6) 
December 8,18, 2015 Amendment to the framework agreement between Pelephone and Eurocom Cellular Communications Ltd., so that it will be extended to other products and brands, including related services for all products and its extension until December 31, 2018 (or three years after the acquisition date of any additional products or brands, whichever is earlier). Annual scope of up to NIS 50 million (for all the products)
(7) Section C belowJune 30, 2016Extension of the amended agreement with Eurocom Communications Ltd. (“Eurocom Communications”) for ongoing management and consultation services for Bezeq. The agreement is for three years, valid until May 31, 2019, unless one of the parties submits three-months’ notice of termination of the agreement. This agreement between the parties is in continuation of the agreement approved on June 13, 2013, described in Item (2) above.NIS 6.4 million per year

 

112

A transaction with a controlling shareholder that is not an irregular transaction was valid in the reporting period:

Date of approval of Bezeq’s
Board of Directors after receiving the approval of the audit committee
Nature of the transactionAmount of the transaction
November 27, 2014Bezeq’s agreement to bring forward payments with Eurocom, according to which DBS may advance, at the supplier’s request, payments that are due, or will be due, to Eurocom for orders of converters.Up to a total cost of USD 6 million
November 3, 2016
Bezeq’s agreement with Eurocom for the additional acquisition of up to 90,000 VTECH N VDSL routers, valid until June 30, 2017.Approval for acquisition of up to USD 11.3 million (not including VAT)
In 2016, there were no acquisitions under this framework, however N VDSL routers were acquired in amounts that do not exceed the negligibility level.

C.Interests of Experts and Counsel

 

Not applicable.

 

ITEM 8.FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

A.Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information

 

Financial Statements

 

See the consolidated financial statements of our company and Bezeq, including the notes thereto, listed in Item 18 “Financial Statements” and incorporated herein by this reference.

 

Export Sales

 

Not applicable.

125

 

Legal Proceedings

 

The Bezeq Group is involved in certain legal and regulatory actions, all of which have arisen in the ordinary course of business, except for the matters described in the following paragraphs. We believe that the ultimate resolution of such matters is unlikely to have a material adverse effect on the Bezeq Group’s consolidated results of operations and/or financial condition, except as described below.

 

Bezeq makes provisionsOur company, Internet Gold and five members of our Board of Directors have been named as respondents in its consolidated financial statements for certaina motion to certify a claim as a derivative claim instituted in the Tel Aviv District Court (Economic Affairs Division) on July 28, 2016. The plaintiff has alleged that NIS 113 million (approximately $29 million) out of the legal proceedings to which it or other Bezeq Group companies isdividends distributed by us in May 2016 was distributed unlawfully as such amount was not included in our profit and loss report, and therefore does not qualify as a party. These provisions are aggregated into groups based on“surplus” that may be lawfully distributed as dividends under the type of activity and claim. As of December 31, 2015, Bezeq has made an aggregate provision of NIS 146 million (see note 14) (approximately $37 million) for its pending litigationIsraeli Companies Law. In November 2016, we, Internet Gold and the respondent directors filed responses to the motion to certify indicating that the distribution complied with the distribution tests of the Companies Law and that the amount distributed as a dividend was derived from actual economic profits and was accordingly appropriate and permissible for distribution. The plaintiff filed an answer in February 2017 and a pretrial hearing was held on March 3, 2017, in which the court granted us permission to file an additional exposure as atresponse and a supplementary expert opinion by April 26, 2017 in order to respond to the plaintiff’s arguments and the plaintiff shall be allowed to respond by April 30, 2017.

We and the other parties to the litigation were instructed by the court to consider the possibility of a dialogue between us regarding the issues in dispute and to inform the court about the results of this dialogue and whether the parties want to set a date for an evidentiary hearing or whether they have any additional preliminary motions, by May 9, 2017. In light of the preliminary stage of the proceedings, no prediction of the outcome is not possible.

On December 31, 201528, 2016, we received a “best judgment” tax assessment for claimsthe years 2011 and 2012 of approximately NIS 50 million (not including interest and linkage differentials). The Israeli Tax Authority is claiming that additional taxes are due with respect to the alleged capital gain generated from the capital reduction of Bezeq during the period from 2011 to 2013. We disagree with the position of the Tax Authority and believe that we have good arguments to support our position. Accordingly, we filed an appeal and believe that the tax liability arising from this assessment, if any, will not be material.

113

Pending proceedings against the Bezeq Group companies on various matters which are unlikely to be realized, which amounts to NIS 5.5 billion (approximately $1.4 billion). There is also an additional exposure of NIS 4 billion (approximately $1 billion) for claims, the outcomes of which cannot yet be assessed. All amounts are linked to the CPI and are stated net of interest. The foregoing amounts do not include additional potential exposure that Bezeq may have attributable to pending motions to certify lawsuits as class actions that do not state the amount claimed if the motion is approved. Since December 31, 2015, additional claims in the amount of NIS 93 million (approximately $24 million) were filed against the Bezeq Group. In addition, claims in the amount of NIS 549 million (approximately $141 million) against the Bezeq Group were dismissed.

 

OurBezeq’s reporting policy is based on Bezeq’s reporting policy, which is based on considerations of qualityqualitative and of amount. Bezeq has determined that the minimum reportable amount deemed to be material would be events affecting net profit by 5% or more of Bezeq’s ongoing operations according to its latest annual consolidated financial statements. Accordingly, this section describes (i) pending legal proceedings involving NIS 120 million or more, which meet the 5% of pretax profit standard according to the Bezeq financial results for the year ended December 31, 2015, (ii) legal proceedings in which the amount claimed is not stated in the statement of claim (except for claims that on their face do not reach the above amount), or (iii) claims that Bezeq believes have other aspects and/or implications beyond their monetary amount. The claims described below are updated in accordance with the updates we receive from the Bezeq Group companies and the public filings of Bezeq with respect to such claims.

Bezeq

Bezeq's reporting policy is based on considerations of quality and of amount.quantitative considerations. Bezeq decided that the bar for determining theof amount for materiality would be events affecting Bezeq'sBezeq’s net profit by 5% or more according to theits latest annual consolidated financial statements. Accordingly, this section describes legal proceedings involving NIS 12080 million or more (approximately NIS 9060 million of the net profit), and legal proceedings in which the amount claimed is not stated in the statement of claim, except in the case of a claim which prima facie does not reach the above amount of the bar above (or(and all unless Bezeq believes the claim has other aspects and/or implications beyond its monetary amount). In regards to class actions, it is noted that submission of class actions in Israel does not involve payment of a filing fee as a portionderiving from the amount of the claim. Accordingly, the amount of a claim in claims of this type may be significantly higher than the scope of true exposure for those claims.

 

126

Pending proceedings:Bezeq

 

Date Parties*Date
of Filing
 InstanceParties Type of proceeding Description Original Amount
of the Claim
(NIS (NIS in millions)
February 2012A. Claim against Bezeq, Pelephone and two other additional cellular companiesDistrict Court (Jerusalem)Action and request to approve it as a class actionThe plaintiffs alleged that the Respondents do not offer the handicapped members of the public accessible handsets and services in a fitting manner, and that they are therefore in breach of the law and the regulations.  
In January 2014, a decision was made with the consent of the parties whereby the claim will be discussed together with another claim on the same matter, which was filed against other communication companies.  
In December 2015, an application was filed with the Court for approval of a settlement arrangement in a case at minimal cost to Bezeq.
361
July 2012

November 2012 
(Two claims that were unified)
Two shareholders vs. Bezeq officers (including those that are no longer in office)

District Court (Tel Aviv, Economic Department)Derivative claim and request to approve a derivative claim



Declarative reliefs

It was argued that members of the Board of Directors were in breach of their duty of caution and fiduciary obligations towards Bezeq, by approving loans which were not used for Bezeq's benefit and were designated for the distribution of dividends, and were therefore in a conflict of interests. Alternatively, the Plaintiff alleges that the resolutions passed by the Board of Directors with respect to the aforementioned loans created a tax exposure for Bezeq due to the fact that the financing expenses are not recognized for tax purposes. Inter alia, declarative relief was requested for nullification of loans taken by Bezeq from the date of the change of control therein, and restitution of dividends by Bezeq's controlling shareholder.  
On September 17, 2014, a decision was issued rejecting the two claims, since the court found that it was not proven that the respondents (officers) made their decisions in breach of their duty, or that they deviated from the confines of their prerogative, or that they damaged Bezeq.  
Two plaintiffs submitted appeals to the Supreme Court against the ruling, which was heard in November 2015 and awaiting a ruling.
900, one claim 
2,640 (net) in the other
April 2013Shareholder vs. Bezeq and Bezeq’s Controlling Shareholder, B Communications Ltd.District Court (Tel Aviv, Economic Department)  Declarative relief claim  The Court was requested to declare that the controlling shareholder of Bezeq has a personal interest in the distribution of dividends distributed in 2013 with the approval of the general meeting, and to instruct Bezeq to publish information and documents, and to summon economy experts whose opinions were published by Bezeq.**

127

DateParties*InstanceType of proceedingDescriptionOriginal Amount
of the Claim
(NIS in millions)
June 2013A shareholder (the same shareholder that filed the claim in April 2013) against Bezeq and the (indirect) controlling shareholder of Bezeq, Eurocom Communications Ltd.District Court (Tel Aviv, Economic Department)Declarative relief claimRequest for a declarative ruling determining that the general meetings of Bezeq’s shareholders of April 24, 2013 and June 13, 2013 were illegally managed, and that the form of remuneration determined and approved in Bezeq’s general meeting of June 13, 2013 relative to the services of four Bezeq directors (as part of the management agreement with Eurocom) is illegal.  

The deliberation on both proceedings was postponed until a final decision is made relative to the appeal to reject the request to approve the derivative claims indicated in row b above (in view of the similarity of the claims in the foregoing proceedings). 
**
January 2015 Shareholder vs.v. Bezeq and Bezeq OfficersDistrict Court (Tel Aviv, Economic Department) Request to approve a class action Claim

In an action filed in the Tel Aviv District Court (Economic Department) for compensation of shareholders for losses, which according to the claim, were caused by "omissions“omissions by Bezeq to report to the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange (TASE) and to conceal material information from the investors"investors”, relative to two significant and material issues: the “Reduction of interconnection fees"fees” and the "Reform“Reform in the wholesale market."
market”.
The members of the represented group are divided into two separate groups:

In regards to the reduction of interconnect fees - any person that purchased Bezeq shares (except the Respondents and/or their representatives) as of February 28, 2013 and held the shares until May 29, 2014; and in respect to the reform in the wholesale market - any person that acquired Bezeq shares (except the Respondents and/or their representatives) as of June 9, 2013 and held the shares (in whole or in part) until the date of submission of the claim or, alternatively, until January 15 to January 20, 2014.



Bezeq respondedAs it emerges from Bezeq’s reports to the public (and as indicated in its petition that itthe petition), Bezeq reported on these two matters by means ofvia immediate reports to the public, as well as byvia its periodic reports (annual and quarterly reports), which included all the material and relevant information relative to these matters, and all reports were lawful.

 ApproximatelyApprox. NIS 2 billion (based on the Shortage of Money method)Method) and, alternatively approximatelyapprox. NIS 1.1 billion (according to the ApproximateApprox. Shortage of Money) method.Money
Method).
 

128B. 

DateParties*InstanceType of proceedingDescriptionOriginal Amount
of the Claim
(NIS in millions)
March 2015 ShareholderDistrict Court (Tel Aviv, Economic Department) Motion for approval of a claim as a derivative claim, including a statement of derivative claim 

The claim was finedfiled in the Tel Aviv District Court against Bezeq, Mr. Shaul Elovitch, the controlling shareholder (indirectly) of Bezeq and Chairman of its Board of Directors, and Bezeq directors who voted for Bezeq'sBezeq’s transaction under the application, as set out below ("(“the Respondents"Respondents”).

According to the allegations in the application, Bezeq decided, through the Respondents, to enter into a transaction to purchase all the holdings and shareholders loans of Eurocom DBS (a company indirectly controlled by Bezeq’s controlling shareholder) in DBS in return for NIS 680 million in cash and contingent considerations of a further NIS 370 million.

502

114

Date

of Filing
PartiesType of proceedingDescriptionOriginal Amount of the Claim (NIS in millions)

The plaintiff claims that the consideration which is expected to be paid for the transaction is exorbitant and the decisions of the Respondents to enter into the transaction caused Bezeq great damage after they were in breach of their duty of care and fiduciary duties towards Bezeq and were negligent in their positions. The plaintiff also alleged that Bezeq'sBezeq’s controlling shareholder violated his duty of fairness and that Bezeq was in breach of its duty of disclosure and reporting regarding the commitment of the trustee of Eurocom DBS’ holdings in DBS to sell the holdings as offrom the end of March 2015.

 
In view of the foregoing, the plaintiff requested that the Courtcourt approve filing of a derivative claim on behalf of Bezeq against the Respondents for the damagedamages allegedly incurred by Bezeq as a result of the Respondent'sRespondents’ decisions with respect to the transaction of NIS 502 million.

On April 2, 2015,January 26, 2017, the court approved submission of a similar application was filed withrevised motion by the same Court. However, on June 25, 2015, the Court dismissed this application dueplaintiff that includes further claims relating, among other things, to the similarityindependence of the applications. An appeal filedparties advising Bezeq, alleged faults in the work of the Audit Committee, Board of Directors and general meeting, and alleged faults stemming from representation of Eurocom by plaintiff of this application to the Supreme Court was dismissed on January 12, 2016.

entities serving as directors in Bezeq.

 502

129C. 

DateParties*InstanceType of proceedingDescriptionOriginal Amount
of the Claim
(NIS in millions)
August 2015 Customer vs.v. BezeqDistrict Court (Tel Aviv)

 Action and request to approve it as a class action It

In an action filed in in the Tel Aviv District Court it was alleged that Bezeq abused its position as a monopoly to price its services in a manner that limits the ability of its competitors to offer fixed-line telephony services at competitive prices, among other things, by offering its customers fixed-line telephony services at the lowest price charged for Internet infrastructure services only. In November 2014,only, i.e. for a critical input for the Antitrust Authority ruled that Bezeq abusedactivity of its position as a monopoly and Bezeq filed an appeal with the Antitrust Tribunal against the ruling.competitors, which operate using VoB technology. The plaintiff argued that the damage to the public resulting from the above was estimated by reviewing the difference between the fixed-line telephony market price comparedand comparing it with the weighted hypothetical price that would be charged in a market with weighted competition that would lead to reduced pricesa long-term reduction in the long term.prices. According to the plaintiff'splaintiff’s claims, the members of the represented group are all fixed-line telephony service subscribers, whether provided by Bezeq or its competitors, including through VoB technology, as of January 15, 2011 until the date of filing the application.

 
In November 2015, Bezeq filed a2016, the court approved Bezeq’s motion for a stay of proceedings in the case for reasons of pending proceedings at the Antitrust Tribunal, which is deliberating the issues of the same nature as those at the center of the approval application.

 244

 

 130115 

 

 

Date Parties*Date
of Filing
 InstanceParties Type of proceeding Description Original Amount
of the Claim
(NIS (NIS in millions)
D.November 2015 Customer vs.v. BezeqCentral District Court Action and requestmotion for certification as a class action ItIn an action in the Central District Court it was alleged that Bezeq abused its position as a monopoly by "preventing“preventing and blocking competition in general and effective competition in the Israeli communication market)market”, and acted to delay and prevent the wholesale market reform, thereby causing damage to the Israeli public and earning unreasonable profits only as a result of abusing its power as a monopoly. According to the plaintiffs'plaintiffs’ allegations, the damage caused by Bezeq to the communicationcommunications market in Israel is expressed by Bezeq'sBezeq’s excessive and unreasonable profits, and they claimedwish to claim damages of NIS 800 million, which they allege is based on 10% of Bezeq'sBezeq’s surplus operating income stemming from abuse of its monopolistic power. Accordingly, the plaintiffs set the amount of the claim at NIS 556 million, after the amount was reduced in another action (an application for certification of a class action dated August 2015, which is described in Section C above, for NIS 244 million for claimed abuse of monopolistic power and refers to the Antitrust Commissioner'sCommissioner’s decision).
Another motion on the same matter that was filed against Bezeq in March 2016 was thrown out in May 2016 due to the similarity to the above motion. Subsequently, and for the court’s approval, the above plaintiff filed a motion for certification of a class action on the same matter.
 556
E.June 2016Customer v. BezeqAction and motion for certification as a class action.

In an action in the Tel Aviv District Court it was alleged that Bezeq was deceptive in offering a campaign to upgrade the Internet surfing speed to certain customers without any additional fee and it subsequently actually charged some of the customers.


On March 28, 2017, the plaintiff filed a motion to abandon the proceeding. On April 3, 2017, a ruling was rendered approving the petitioner’s motion to withdraw the class action certification motion and dismissing the petitioner’s personal claim.

112
F.August 2016A customer v. Bezeq and an ISPAction and motion for certification as a class actionIn an action in the Tel Aviv District Court it was alleged, among other things. that the defendants acted unlawfully with respect to the transfer of Internet subscribers from one ISP to another in that the subscriber is not disconnected immediately from the abandoned ISP and as a result is charged twice for the same service.*
G.September 2016Cellcom and PartnerOpening order for declarative relief and orders for mandamus against BezeqIn an action in the Tel Aviv District Court, the plaintiff asked the court to declare, among other things, that: (1) Bezeq is obligated to market those ISPs who are among the Applicants as part of the joint bundles marketed by Bezeq (“Reverse Bundle”) in an equal manner and in accordance with the Ministry’s instructions, and to instruct Bezeq to do so; (2) the obligations imposed on Bezeq with respect to the supply of managed wholesale broadband access include an obligation to install and connect customers of 013 Netvision and 012 Smile to Bezeq’s infrastructure up to the first socket in their home, and to instruct Bezeq to do so; and (3) Bezeq is obligated to allow the Applicants and/or any one of them to use the passive infrastructure that it owns and to instruct Bezeq to do so.*

 

 131116 

 

 

Date
of Filing
PartiesType of proceedingDescriptionOriginal Amount of the Claim (NIS in millions)
H.August 2016 and December 2016Customer v. BezeqTwo actions together with motions for their certification as class actions

Motions were filed in the Tel Aviv District Court and the Central District Court claiming that Bezeq charges a monthly payment of NIS 5.93 for “support and/or liability” as part of using its Internet infrastructure, unlawfully and without consent.


Due to the similarity between the motions, the motion pending in the Central District Court was transferred to the Tel Aviv District Court and a motion was filed to strike out one of the actions.


On March 26, 2017, the Court ruled to strike out the consolidated motion (the motion from December 2016 in the amount of NIS 160 million).

* One action for an unknown amount and the other for

160

I.February 2017Customer v. BezeqTwo motions for certification as class actionsAn action was filed in the Central District Court claiming that Bezeq collects payment form some of its customers for an antivirus service, while in practice it does not provide them with such service, and that it starts charging for provision of the service from signing of the agreement with the customers and not from actual provision of the service. Accordingly, the Applicant requests requiring Bezeq to compensate its customers that purchased the service and did not actually receive it for the damages incurred by them, including refunding of amounts collected for the service.
It is noted that in the same month, another action together with a motion for certification as a class action was filed with the Jerusalem District Court on the same matter.
* There is no accurate estimation, estimated at NIS tens of millions.
Amount of the additional action - 11
J.February 2017HOT v. the Ministry of Communications and others (including Bezeq)Petition to the Supreme CourtA demand was made in the Supreme Court for a hearing regarding the wholesale market prices for HOT, inter alia, claiming that the prices which are expected to be fixed are lower than the cost price for HOT.
K.April 2017Customer v. Bezeq, its subsidiary, Walla! Communications Ltd., Yad2 and an advertising company owned by WallaA motion for class action certification motion filed with the Tel Aviv District CourtThe motion was made in the Tel Aviv District Court regarding Bezeq’s B144 service, which enables businesses to advertise on the internet. Service on Bezeq was not effected with due process. According to the petitioner, the respondent unlawfully charge subscribers for certain services. Bezeq is studying the motion and is unable to evaluate its likelihood of success at the present stage.
The petitioner estimates the class action amount at NIS 1.11 billion (based on an estimate of 300,000 customers and compensation of NIS 3,700 per customer).

*The amount of the claim is not indicated or the claim is not a financial claim.

Legal proceedings which ended induring the reporting period or by the date of publication of the reportthis report.

 

Date of Filing
PartiesType of ProceedingDescriptionOriginal Amount of the Claim (NIS in millions)
A. PartiesInstanceType of ProceedingDescriptionOriginal Amount
of the Claim
(NIS in millions)
May 2005  




DecemberFebruary 2012
 Individuals vs. the State of Israel, Israel Broadcast AuthorityClaim against Bezeq, Pelephone and Bezeq  

Individuals vs. the State of Israel, Israel Broadcast Authority and Bezeq
District Court (Tel Aviv)  

District Court (Center)
Damages claims - Hillel Station

Damage to property and finances claim Body injuries claim
Claim for damage to property and finances and physical injury, caused, according to the claim, as a result of prohibited radiation from the Hillel broadcasting station.

Property damage claim - on January 18, 2016, the court dismissed the claim.  
Body injury claim - on January 12, 2016, in view of the agreement of the parties to the court's proposal, the court dismissed the claim for body injury without ordering costs.

In regards to the two aforementioned claims, Bezeq discontinued its broadcasts from the station as requested by the State and the Broadcasting Authority, and from that date the site is no longer used for broadcasting.
 23













**
June 2014Customer vs. BezeqRegional (Haifa)other additional cellular companies Action and request to approve it as a class action According

In an action filed in the District Court (Jerusalem) the plaintiffs alleged that the Respondents do not offer the disabled members of the public accessible handsets and services in a fitting manner, and that they are therefore in breach of the law and the regulations.


In January 2014, a decision was made with the consent of the parties whereby the claim will be discussed together with another claim on the same matter, which was filed against other communication companies.


In April 2016, a compromise settlement in this case was validated as a court ruling thus concluding the proceeding.

361

117

Date of FilingPartiesType of ProceedingDescriptionOriginal Amount of the Claim (NIS in millions)
B.July 2012
November 2012
(Two claims that were unified)
Two shareholders v. Company officers (including those that are no longer in office)
Derivative claim and request to approve a derivative claim
Declarative reliefs

In an action filed in the Tel Aviv District Court (Economic Department) It was claimed that members of Bezeq’s Board of Directors were in breach of their duty of caution and fiduciary obligations towards Bezeq, by approving loans which were not used for Bezeq’s benefit and were designated for the distribution of dividends, and were therefore in a conflict of interests. Alternatively, the Plaintiff alleged that the resolutions passed by the Board of Directors with respect to the Plaintiff,aforementioned loans created a subscribertax exposure for Bezeq due to the fact that the financing expenses are not recognized for tax purposes. Inter alia, declarative relief was requested for nullification of Bezeq's Internet infrastructure,loans taken by Bezeq does not allow existing subscribers to connect to its Internet infrastructure at the tariffs it offers to new subscribers for the same service.

On August 11, 2015, the Court approved the plaintiff's withdrawal from the applicationdate of the change of control t, and restitution of dividends by Bezeq’s controlling shareholder.
On September 17, 2014, a decision was issued rejecting the two claims, finding that it was not proven that the respondents (officers) made their decisions in breach of their duty, or that they deviated from the confines of their prerogative, or that they damaged Bezeq.


On December 28, 2016, a Supreme Court ruling was handed down with respect to two appeals of the District Court’s rulings. The Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the appeals and accepted Bezeq’s arguments and the Applicants were charged expenses. On April 6, 2017, a petition for certification as a class action without ordering costs.further hearing that was filed by one of the appellants.

900, one claim
2,640 (net) in the other
C.April 2013
 
 144Shareholder v. Bezeq and Bezeq’s Controlling Shareholder, B CommunicationsDeclarative relief claim
In an action filed in the Tel Aviv District Court (Economic Department) the court was asked to declare that the controlling shareholder of Bezeq has a personal interest in the distribution of dividends paid in 2013 with the approval of the general meeting, and to instruct Bezeq to publish information and documents, and to summon economic experts whose opinions were published by Bezeq.*
June 2013A shareholder (the same shareholder that filed the claim in April 2013) against Bezeq and the (indirect) controlling shareholder of Bezeq, Eurocom CommunicationsDeclarative relief claimIn an action filed in the Tel Aviv District Court (Economic Department) a request for a declarative ruling was sought to determine whether the general meetings of Bezeq’s shareholders on April 24, 2013 and June 13, 2013 were illegally managed, and that the form of compensation determined and approved in Bezeq’s general meeting dated June 13, 2013 relative to the services of four directors (as part of the management agreement with Eurocom) is illegal.
The deliberation on both proceedings was postponed until a final decision is made relative to the appeal to reject the request to approve the derivative claims indicated in section B above (in view of the similarity of the claims in the foregoing proceedings). Upon dismissal of the appeals in the same motions, as set out in the B above, both of these actions were dismissed by agreement on January 3, 2017.
*

 

 

*Part of the proceedings were originally filed also against additional defendants that were removed later on from the proceedings. The parties indicated in the table are according to the current situation.

**The amount of the claim is not indicated or the claim is not a financial claim.

 

Pelephone

 132

Pelephone

Breakdown of proceedings for claims in material amounts and claims which could have material implications for Pelephone's operations:

Date of Filing PartiesCourt Type of Action Details 

Amount of Claim
claim NIS million

AugustA.Aug 2010 Customer v. PelephoneDistrict (Central) A financial claim filed with a motion to certify it as a class action. TheIn an action filed in the Central District Court the claimant claims that Pelephone should refrain from collecting Value Added Tax from customers who use its services when they are outside Israel. The motion also contains relief forseeks an order instructing Pelephone to cease charging its customers VAT for such services which they use outside Israel, and an order instructing that the moneys collected to date be refunded. In August 2014 the Court dismissed the application for recognition. As a class action.application. In October 2014 an appeal of the ruling was filed. The parties are waiting for a judgment to be handed in the appeal. The amount of the claim is not stated, but the application is estimated in the tens of millions of shekels.
February 2012B. Customer v. Pelephone, the Bezeq, Cellcom and PartnerDistrict (Jerusalem)A financial claim filed with a motion to certify it as a class action.The action relates to the alleged failure to comply with the provisions of the law with respect to people with disabilities when rendering Bezeq's services. In December 2015 a settlement was signed between the parties to drop the suit in return for implementing a series of accessibility adjustments and benefits for people with disabilities set out in the settlement. This arrangement was submitted to the court and is awaiting approval.Approximately 361 for all the defendants, without noting an amount for each of the defendants.

133

DatePartiesCourtType of ActionDetails

Amount of Claim
NIS million

May 2012 Customer v. Pelephone District (Tel Aviv)Financial class action suit Civil classIn an actionThe filed in the Tel Aviv District Court the claimant alleges that Pelephone does not inform customers wishing to subscribe foruse its services using a handset that was not purchased from Pelephone, that if the handset does not support the 850 MHz frequency, they will only get partial reception over one frequency rather than two. In March 2014, the court certified the claim as a class action which was subsequent to Pelephone announcing its agreement (for reasons of efficiency) to conduct the claim as a class action, while retaining its arguments. Approx. 124

118

Date of FilingPartiesType of ActionDetailsAmount of claim NIS million
AugustC.December 2012 Customer v. Pelephone Partner and Cellcom A financial claim filed with a motion to certify it as a class action.In an action filed in the Jerusalem  District (Central)Court the claimants allege that Pelephone allowed its subscribers to be unlawful charged by the content service company, E-interactive for mobile content services that were not ordered.Approx. 107
D.November 2013Customer v. PelephoneA financial claim filed with a motion to certify it as a class action.In an action filed in the Tel Aviv District Court the claimants allege that Pelephone does not grant the same perks to all of its customers, thereby distinguishing between those customers that they allege Pelephone considers to be highly valuable and others, which they claim is in breach of Pelephone’s license and the law. They also request as remedy that Pelephone refrain from granting such perks. A stay six months was ordered in order to enable the Ministry of Communications to formulate its position on the matter.Approx. 300
E.July 2014Customer v. Pelephone and other mobile telephony companies.A financial claim filed with a motion to certify it as a class action.In an action filed in the Tel Aviv District Court the claimants allege that Pelephone, together with three other mobile telephony companies, registered subscribers for content services without obtaining their consent and in contravention of the law, and thereby creating a “platform” for iQtech Group to unlawfully charge tens of thousands of people for content services.Approx. 100 with regard to the mobile telephony companies and 300 against all the defendants.
F.May 2015Customer v. PelephoneA financial claim filed with a motion to certify it as a class action.In an action filed in the Tel Aviv District Court the claimants allege that Pelephone does not offer “Walla Mobile” tracks to all its existing customers and those who join are subscribers who want to transfer to a different track, and that this in in violation of the provisions of the license that obligates equality, and thereby it misleads its customers. The proceedings in the case were consolidated with another case due to the similarity between the proceedings.The amount of the claim is not stated, but the application is estimated to be in millions of shekels.
G.December 2015Customer v. PelephoneA financial claim filed with a motion to certify it as a class action.In an action filed in the Lod District Court the claimant alleged that Pelephone violated the mobility rules. Allegedly, when attempting to move to another operator the applicant found out that she was deliberately blocked by Pelephone from moving. When calling Pelephone to clarify the issue, she found out that the reason for blocking her was an attempt to retain her and prevent her from moving to a competitor. In addition, injunctions are sought to prevent such blocking. On November 6, 2016 the parties filed a motion to dismiss the motion for certification.The amount of the claim is not stated, but is estimated in the tens of millions of shekels.
H.May 2016Customer v. Pelephone A financial claim filed with a motion to certify it as a class action. The claimant alleged that Pelephone opted subscribers to its Smart Call service without their consent or their knowledge, and this in contravention of the provisions of the Law and of its license and the Smart Call service portfolio.Approx. 200

119

Date of FilingPartiesType of ActionDetailsAmount of claim NIS million
I.June 2016Customer v. PelephoneA financial claim filed with a motion to certify it as a class action.In an action filed in the Jerusalem District Court the claimant alleged that Pelephone overcharges for calls made from overseas to Israel in the overseas Travel track and charges at the higher rate for a direct dialing call instead the rate for a call via the savings service, because of the fact that the calls were dialed using the country code for Israel, as the phone numbers are saved in the claimant’s phone.Approx. 86
J.October 2016Customer v. Pelephone, Partner and CellcomA financial claim filed with a motion to certify it as a class action.In an action filed in the Lod District Court the claimant alleged that the defendants do not allow their subscribers to make full use of their overseas package and this through discriminatory terms under which the package can be used for a very short period (between one week to one month only) and that at the end of that period, the unused balance of the package expires and no reimbursement is given.The amount of the claim is not stated, but is estimated in the tens of millions of shekels.

Legal proceedings which ended during the reporting period or by the date of publication of this report.

Date of FilingPartiesType of ActionDetailsAmount of the original claim
NIS million
A.February 2012Customer v. Pelephone, Bezeq, Cellcom and PartnerA financial claim filed with a motion to certify it as a class action.In an action filed in the Jerusalem District Court, the claimants alleged the failure to comply with the provisions of the law with respect to people with disabilities when rendering services. In April 2016, the Court approved a settlement arrangement between the parties under which the suit will be dismissed in return for implementation of a series of accessibility adjustments and benefits for people with disabilities. In addition, the group of defendants will credit the claimants in amounts that are not material.

Approx.
361 for all the defendants, without noting an amount for each of the defendants.
B.August 2012Customer v. Pelephone, Partner and CellcomA financial claim filed with a motion to certify it as a class action.In an action filed in the Central District Court the claimants allege that under the repair services provided by the defendants for a fee (payment per repair or a monthly fee for repair service), if a certain part in the handset must be replaced, the defendants do not provide the customer with the spare part, and this in contravention of the law. The claimants also allege thatFurthermore, the defendants reuse the replaced parts when providing repair services for other customers, thus ostensibly enriching themselves twice. The action also requests writs of mandamus and declaratory relief. In May 2016 the court approved the settlement agreement reached between the parties, under which the motion will be dismissed and Pelephone will implement future changes in its conduct when receiving products for repair. Approximately Approx.
120 for each of the defendants, in a total amount of 360.
November 2013C.August 2015 Customer v. PelephoneDistrict (Tel Aviv) A financial claim filed with a motion to certify it as a class action. The claimants allege that Pelephone does not grantIn an action filed in the same perks to all its customers, thereby distinguishing between those customers that they allege Pelephone considers to be highly valuable and others, which they claim is in breach of Pelephone's license andCentral District Court the law. They also request as remedy that Pelephone refrain from granting such perks. The case is in mediation proceedings between the parties.300

134

DatePartiesCourtType of ActionDetails

Amount of Claim
NIS million

May 2015Customer v. PelephoneDistrict (Tel Aviv)A financial claim filed with a motion to certify it as a class action.The claimants allege that Pelephone does not offer "Walla Mobile" tracks to all its existing customers and those who join are subscribers who want to transfer to a different track, and that this in in violation of the provisions of the license that obligates equality, and thereby it misleads its customers.The amount of the claim is not stated, but the application is estimated to be in millions of shekels.
August 2015Customer v. PelephoneDistrict (Central)A financial claim filed with a motion to certify it as a class action.The claimants allege that one of the communications companies made improper use of its database in violation of the Privacy Protection Law 1981, when it transferred or sold the customers'customers’ particulars to the other respondents, including Pelephone. The claim against Pelephone revolves mainly around the purchase or receipt of this information and its use for marketing purposes, in a way that violates the provisions of the Communications Law regarding the sending of spam. The applicant does not specifically mentionIn November\ 2016, the amount ofcourt approved the claim against Pelephone.claimant’s withdrawal from the motion to certify a class action and dismissed his personal claim. The amount of the claim is not stated, but the application is estimated in the tens of millions of shekels.

120

Date of FilingPartiesType of ActionDetailsAmount of the original claim
NIS million
D.November 2015 Customer v. Pelephone and two other cellularmobile telephony companies.District (Central) A financial claim filed with a motion to certify it as a class action. TheIn an action filed in the Central District Court the claimants allege that the pre-paid prices of the companies are higher than the post-paid prices, which is due to cartelization of the three companies in this market. In September the court dismissed the claimant’s personal claim and the motion to certify it as a class action and ordered him to pay the expenses. In October 2016 an appeal of the ruling was filed.  In January 2017, the appeal was dismissed. ApproximatelyApprox. 2,800 with regard to Pelephone (and the total amount against the three companies is in excess of 13,000)

 

Bezeq International

 135

Date of Filing PartiesCourt Type of Action Details 

Amount of Claimclaim
NIS million

A.December 2015.2011 Customer v. PelephoneBezeq International Civil class actionIn an action filed in the Central District (Lod)Court the claimants allege that during October 2011, Bezeq International failed to provide its Internet customers with the browsing speed it had undertaken in the contract. The plaintiffs seek the refund of the monthly fees and compensation for mental anguish. On March 13, 2016, the court certified the claim as a class action.Approx. 120
B.January 2015Customer v. Bezeq International A financial claim filed with a motion to certify it as a class action. TheIn an action filed in the Central District Court the claimants allege that Pelephone violates the mobility plan / rules in that, when attempting to move to another operator (the receiving operator) the applicant found out that she was deliberately blocked by Pelephone (the deserted operator) from moving. When calling Pelephone to clarify the issue, she alleges that she found out that reason for blocking her was an attempt to retain her and prevent her from moving to a competitor. In addition, injunctions are sought to prevent such blocking.The amount of the claim is not stated, but the application is estimated in Tens of millions.
March 2016Customer v. PelephoneDistrict (Tel Aviv)A financial claim filed with a motion to certify it as a class action.Due to a widespread disruption of Pelephone’s network on March 21, 2016, which originated from a fire in one of its facilities, Pelephone’s customers were (fully or partially) denied the possibility of receiving services they were entitled to receive, including sending and receiving calls, messages and cellular Internet service.Reimbursement of the pro rata payment paid by each customer plus an additional NIS 10 per private customer and NIS 1,010 per business customer.

Legal proceedings that ended during the Reporting Period

Date of filing
of the action
PartiesCourtType of ActionDetails

Amount of the original claim

NIS million

May 2015Customer v. PelephoneDistrict (Tel Aviv)A financial claim filed with a motion to certify it as a class action.The claimants allege that Pelephone violated a settlement arrangement approved by the court in a ruling handed in another class action filed by the same applicant against Pelephone. The matter of the claimed violation is related to Pelephone sale of earphones. The applicant estimates the amount of the motion to be NIS 410 million. In January 2016 the plaintiff filed a motion to withdraw the claim and a ruling was issued approving the withdrawal.410

136

Bezeq International

Date Parties Court Type of Action Details 

Amount of Claim
NIS million

2008 Customer v. Bezeq International and other international operators District (Central) A financial claim filed with a motion to certify it as a class action. Four claims, which were consolidated to form one suit relating to the use of international phone cards for dialing to destinations in the Philippines, Thailand and Nepal. The plaintiffs, who are foreign workers, claimed that the phone cards provided an average of 50% of the time units indicated to the purchasers of the cards, and that Bezeq International also deducts call time for time unsuccessfully spent attempting to call someone, contrary to the declaration that it does not charge for units of round minutes, provides misleading information about the number of units on the card and formed a cartel with other international telecommunication companies regarding raising the prices for phone cards. The plaintiffs sought court recognition to file their claim as a class action on behalf of a group that includes anyone who purchased the relevant type of phone cards during the seven years prior to filing the claim and throughout the duration of the proceedings. The plaintiffs also petitioned the Court to order Bezeq International to cease its foregoing conduct. In November 2010, the Court recognized the motion to certify a class action on the grounds of deception. Nonetheless, the Court dismissed part of the causes of action and determined that the deception ended after the purchase of several phone cards. A request to appeal filed by Bezeq International was denied in September 2012 due to the settlement agreement signed between the other defendants in the proceedings and the plaintiffs.  
 1,159
December 2011. Customer v. Bezeq International District (Central) A financial claim filed with a motion to certify it as a class action (certified since). According to the plaintiffs, during October 2011, Bezeq International failed to provide its Internet customers with the browsing speed it had undertaken in the contract. The plaintiffs sought refund of the monthly fees and compensation for mental anguish. 
 120

137

DatePartiesCourtType of ActionDetails

Amount of Claim
NIS million

February 2012Customer v. Bezeq International and other international operatorsDistrict (Tel Aviv)A financial claim filed with a motion to certify it as a class action.Similar to the foregoing in line A above, the plaintiffs alleged that the defendants misled customers who purchased overseas dialing services by means of pre-paid international phone cards, with respect to the number of minutes on the card.
2,700
January 2015Customer v. Bezeq InternationalDistrict (Central)A financial claim filed with a motion to certify it as a class action.They claimed that the Moreshet content filtering services that Bezeq International provides for its religious and traditional sector customers, for a fee, do not protect users from offensive content and that their exposure to such content caused them harm. The claimants also demandedIt is further claimed that Bezeq International must compensate the customers who purchased content filtering services and who were not offered the basic filtering service which is provided free of charge.
 ApproximatelyAbout 65, with the addition of NIS 1,000 for each member of the group,members of the size of which is unknown.class (every pupil in the Israeli education system).
December 2015.C.November 2015 Customer v. Bezeq InternationalDistrict (Central) A financial claim filed with a motion to certify it as a class action. TheIn an action filed in the Central District Court the claimants allegedallege that Bezeq International charged the listed  customers for an overseas dialing plan at "premium prices"“premium prices” that were higher than the agreed price fixed in the communications plan. The plaintiffs contend that Bezeq International exceeded the applicability of the plan, fixed line destinations overseas and defined them as "premium destinations"“premium destinations”, without basis and by misleading customers.

 Not noted.

138

DBS

DateD. PartiesCourtType of ActionDetails

Amount of
Claim

March 2013June 2016 Customer v. DBSDistrict (Central)Bezeq International A financial claim filed with a motion to certify it as a class action. The applicant claimsIn an action filed in the Jerusalem District Court the claimants allege that DBS disconnectedBezeq International misleads its customers from channel 5+ and reconnected them only afterby marketing fast Internet packages at 100MB, while the customers contactedactual speed provided is much lower.Approx. 187
E.September 2016Customer v. Bezeq and requested reconnection but continued collecting fees for the channel from those customers who did not contact them and were, therefore, not reconnected. The parties conducted negotiations to end the proceedings by settlement. In May 2015 the partiesInternationalA financial claim filed with a motion withto certify it as a class action.In an action filed in the court to approve a settlement under which DBS will grantCentral District Court the membersclaimants allege that Bezeq International charges excessive and unreasonable rates in contravention of section 17 of the class action group a benefit and will pay compensation to the class action plaintiff and his legal fees ("the Settlement Agreement"). In September 2015, the Attorney General's position regarding the settlement agreement was received according to which the settlement agreement should not be approved because it does not provide real compensationCommunications Law, for the group members. During the hearing before the Court in December 2015 on the motion to approve the settlement arrangement, the Court suggested that the parties amend the settlement so that part of the group members will be given a higher credit to purchase DBS products and another part will not be given the benefit. In February 2016, DBS filed an amended recommendation to the Court that it grant a credit to part of the group members only in a higher amount (with two alternatives) in the different credit format than that suggested by the Court.outgoing international calls. The applicant estimates the damage to himself at NIS 1,065 of which NIS 1,000 is non-monetary damage, but did not include a total amount for the suit.

Not noted.

 

 139121 

 

 

Legal proceedings which ended during the reporting period or by the date of publication of this report.

  Date Parties Type of Action Details Amount of claim
NIS million
A. 2008 Customer v. Bezeq International and other international operators Civil class action 

Four claims that were filed in the Central District Court were consolidated into one action relating to the use of international phone cards for dialing to destinations in the Philippines, Thailand and Nepal, alleging that the phone cards provide an average of 50% of the time units indicated to the purchasers of the cards. The claimants also allege that Bezeq International deducts call time for time unsuccessfully spent attempting to call someone, does not charge for units of round minutes, provides misleading information about the number of units on the card and formed a cartel with other international telecommunication companies to raise the prices for phone cards. In November 2010, the court recognized the motion to certify a class action on the grounds of deception.

 
In September 2016, a judgment was handed approving the settlement arrangement, under which Bezeq International will allow calls in the amount of NIS 5 million to be made free of charge, and will pay the representative plaintiffs compensation and legal fees in an amount of NIS 500,000.

 1,159
B. February 2012 Customer v. Bezeq International and other international operators A financial claim filed with a motion to certify it as a class action. In an action filed in the Tel Aviv District Court the claimants made allegation similar to the action described in section A. above. The foregoing settlement described in section A above also applies to this claim. 2,700

DBS

Date PartiesCourt Type of Action Details 

Amount of
Claim

claim
A.June 2014 Customer and apartment building representatives vs. DBSDistrict (Tel Aviv) A financial claim filed with a motion (consolidated) to certify it as a class action. The

In an action filed in the Tel Aviv District Court the claimants allege that DBS unlawfully charged residents in apartment buildings (both subscribers(subscribers and non-subscribers)non-subscribers of DBS) for the electricity consumption for the satellite dishes and/or amplifiers and/or other devices that DBS uses, that are located in these apartment buildings. The applicant alsohas petitioned the Courtcourt, among other things, to order DBS to refund the amount collected for electricity consumption as aforesaid.consumption. 

 
The second lawsuit (that was originally filed with the District Court in Haifa, and was moved for hearing before the Tel Aviv District Court in Tel Aviv in September 2014) includes a claim that DBS installed equipment in apartment buildings that operate on electricity and according to their claim, DBS connected the outside equipment without approval and consent of the apartment buildings in which the equipment was connected to the communal electricity and also consumed electricity without paying for it.


In October 2015, the Court consolidatedcourt ruled to consolidate the proceedings in both motions for certification and filing of consolidated statements. In December 2016, the claimants’ request for interlocutory remedies against DBS regarding the disconnection of subscribers who refuse to bear the electricity costs and the signing of intermediate representatives on agreements to bear these expenses was struck.

 NIS 80 million is for monetary and non-monetary damages allegedly caused due to the electricity consumption for DBS systems and an injunction ordering DBS to install electricity meters for measuring the electricity consumption of DBS’s systems. The costs were estimated in the motion to amount to NIS 44.6 million.
 

September122

DatePartiesType of ActionDetailsAmount of claim
B.Sept 2014 Customer v. DBSDistrict (Tel Aviv) A financial claim filed with a motion to certify it as a class action. TheIn an action filed in the Tel Aviv District Court the claimants allege that electronic advertisements sent by DBS to its customers were in contravention of Section 30A of the Communications Law, in breach of DBS’s license and in breach of the agreement between DBS and its customers. The applicants petitioned the Courtcourt for relief for the inconvenience caused to the customers ofby DBS, harassment, loss of time, etc. and sought relief in an amount that willto be determined atin the Court’s discretion, for the unlawful enrichment of DBS as a result of sending these messages.court’s discretion. NIS 402 million (with additional relief to be determined at the court'scourt’s discretion).

140

DateC. PartiesCourtType of ActionDetails

Amount of
Claim

July 2015







September 2015
 Customer v. DBSDistrict (Central) A financial claim filed with a motion to certify it as a class action. The

In an action filed in the Central District Court the claimants allege discrimination against DBS customers who are not offered or given the best terms or the lowest price for the services they received from DBS; a claim of discrimination against new DBS customers over existing customers who are eligible for receiving a campaign or benefit for joining DBS; and a claim of discrimination of new members who are acquainted with the Bezeq'scompany’s employees, over other new members. According to the allegations, these actions are contrary to DBS’s obligationsobligation under its license and by law to refrain from discriminating with regard to the price for the services it provides.
The applicant requests that DBS will compensate members of the group for the monetary difference between the priceprices that each of them actually paid to DBS for the services, and the lowest price they could have paid for those services. In addition, the applicant requests that the Courtcourt order DBS to offer and provide its services to everyone requesting its services aton the same terms and to publish them in its various publications. In September 2015, following the filing of another motion to certify a class action against DBS alleging price discrimination, the Courtcourt held that the two actions will be defined as related cases and in November 2015 the Courtcourt ordered the consolidation of the two motions.motions to certify.


With the consent of the parties the court decided that, in view of the fact that a stay order was handed in the hearing of parallel cases against different defendants raising similar legal and factual questions by the court hearing them and in view of the fact that there is a pending motion to transfer the hearing on these petitions to the foregoing other court, the proceedings concerning the motions to certify were suspended until a decision is issued.

 

The applicant does not specify the amount of the claim, but the extent of the damage is estimated to be tens of millions of shekel.

 
The amount of the second claim is estimated by the applicants to be NIS 13 million plus monetary damages as will be awarded by the Court,

D.December 2015 Customer v. DBSDistrict (Central) A financial claim filed with a motion to certify it as a class action. A claimIn an action filed in the Central District Court the claimants allege that DBS and HOT operate illegally by providing their customers with premium content services, (as part of the VOD service of DBS and HOT)DBS), that is provided under transactions for fixed periods and automatically renewable, while charging their customers for the service unilaterally, without the clients'clients’ consent and in violation of the law. Thus, allegedly, they charge their customers illegal amounts and while enriching themselves unjustly. The applicants do not explicitly mention the amount of the claim, but believe that the conduct described provides DBS and HOT annual income of tens of millions of shekels.
E.April 2016 Customer v. DBS District (Tel Aviv)A financial claim filed with a motion to certify it as a class action. A claimIn an action filed in the Tel Aviv District Court the claimants allege that the condition included in the agreement between DBS applied “freezing”and its customers, which allows a subscription to be placed on hold for a limited timeperiod thus avoiding the payment of a subscription fee for the period, and avoiding paymentprovided that the suspension is for a period of subscription fees for such period, inat least 30 days is a discriminatory condition and is unreasonable term in a standard contract. The claimants also contend that DBS allows customers to have their subscription frozen for shorter periods if they make the request by phone - which the plaintiffs argue misleads consumers, is unfair conduct and is in breach of the provisions of the Contracts Law, the consumer protection laws and Unjust Enrichment Law. The claimants have asked the court to order the cancellation of the Condition of the agreement and alternatively to determine that DBS’s conduct as described above is misleading and not in good faith.  The court was also petitioned to instruct DBS to compensate the subscribers who are members of the group in the total amount of NIS 736 millionmillion.

 

 141123 

 

 

DatePartiesType of ActionDetailsAmount of claim
F.March 2017Customer v. DBSA financial claim with a motion to certify it as a class action.In an action filed in the Central District Court the claimant alleged that DBS was in breach of the agreement with its customers and the conditions of the license issued by the Ministry of Communications when it discontinued broadcasts of the Children’s Channel from January 1, 2017 and instead started to broadcast a channel called Yes KIDZ, which the claimant alleges is not an appropriate substitute. The claimant is seeking a refund from DBS to each member of the class group in the amounts it collected or overcharged  (not less than NIS 100 per month) from the date of discontinuation of the channel broadcasts, and that DBS should also compensate all members of the group for the inconvenience caused as a result of discontinuation of the channel broadcasts (a loss which is estimated in the amount of NIS 250 for each group member).The claimant does not expressly mention the amount sought from DBS, but defines the group as all DBS customers on the date of discontinuation of the channel broadcasts, excluding those customers who have ostensibly already received specific compensation from DBS for discontinuation of the channel broadcasts.

Legal proceedings which ended during the reporting period or by the date of publication of the reportthis report.

 

  Date of filing
of the action
 PartiesCourt Type of Action Details Amount of
Claim claim
A. February 2015March 2013 Customer v. DBSDistrict (Tel Aviv) A financial claim filed with a motion to certify it as a class action. It was claimed thatIn an action filed in the way subtitles are inserted in DBS's television broadcasts detract fromCentral District Court the enjoyment of its hearing impaired customers. Thus, it is claimedclaimants alleged that DBS misleads itsdisconnected customers regardingfrom channel 5+ and reconnected them only after the qualitycustomers contacted DBS and requested reconnection but continued collecting fees for the channel from those customers who did not contact them and were, therefore, not reconnected. Pursuant to an amended settlement agreement DBS will grant each of the service it provides and unjust enrichment. The applicant sought compensation formembers of the alleged damages caused to users due to DBS's alleged deception. In July 2015 a ruling was issued according to which the Court approved the motion for withdrawal filed by the applicant, with DBS's agreement.group benefits of NIS 14 million. The applicant estimates the damage to himself at NIS 126 million1,065 of which NIS 1,000 is non-monetary damage, but did not include a total amount for the suit.

142

 

Dividend Distribution Policy

 

Our Board of Directors declared our first dividend as a public company on November 7, 2013,We currently do not have a dividend of NIS 3.41 per share and NIS 102 milliondistribution policy in the aggregate. The record date for the distribution of the dividend was November 18, 2013 and the payment date was December 3, 2013. Dividend amounts paid in U.S. dollars were converted from NIS based upon the representative rate of exchange published by the Bank of Israel on November 18, 2013. Tax was withheld at a rate of up to 25%.

On May 21, 2015, our Board of Directors declared a dividend of NIS 2.24 per share (approximately $0.58 cents) and approximately NIS 67 million (approximately $17 million) in the aggregate. Tax was withheld at a rate of 25%. Dividends amounts paid in U.S. dollars were converted from NIS based on the representative rate of exchange published by the Bank of Israel on June 1, 2015. The record date for the distribution of the dividend was June 2, 2015 and the payment date was June 16, 2015.

On August 31, 2015, our Board of Directors declared a dividend of NIS 0.73 per share (approximately $0.19) and approximately NIS 22 million (approximately $6 million) in the aggregate. Dividend amounts paid in U.S. dollars were converted from NIS based upon the representative rate of exchange published by the Bank of Israel on September 16, 2015. The record date for the distribution of the dividend was September 16, 2015 and the payment date was September 29, 2015.

On November 19, 2015, our Board of Directors declared a dividend of NIS 1.27 per share (approximately $0.32) and approximately NIS 38 million (approximately $10 million) in the aggregate. Dividend amounts paid in U.S. dollars were converted from NIS based upon the representative rate of exchange published by the Bank of Israel on December 10, 2015. The record date for the distribution of the dividend was December 10, 2015 and the payment date was December 23, 2015.

place. According to the Israeli Companies Law, a company may distribute dividends out of its profits (as such term is defined in the Israeli Companies Law), provided that there is no reasonable concern that payment of the dividend will prevent the company from satisfying all its current and foreseeable obligations, as they become due. Notwithstanding the foregoing, dividends may be paid with the approval of a court, at the company’s request, provided that there is no reasonable concern that payment of the dividend will prevent the company from satisfying its current and foreseeable obligations, as they become due. In the event cash dividends are declared, such dividends will be paid in NIS.

 

Our Board of Directors declared our first dividend as a public company on November 7, 2013, a dividend of NIS 3.41 per share and NIS 102 million in the aggregate. The dividend was paid on December 3, 2013.

On May 21, 2015, our Board of Directors declared a dividend of NIS 2.24 per share and approximately NIS 67 million in the aggregate. The dividend was paid on June 2, 2015.

124

On August 31, 2015, our Board of Directors declared a dividend of NIS 0.73 per share and approximately NIS 22 million in the aggregate. The dividend was paid on September 25, 2015.

On November 19, 2015, our Board of Directors declared a dividend of NIS 1.27 per share and approximately NIS 38 million in the aggregate. The dividend was paid on December 23, 2015.

On May 25, 2016, our Board of Directors declared a dividend of NIS 11.88 per share and approximately NIS 355 million in the aggregate. The dividend was paid on June 29, 2016.

B.Significant Changes

 

Except as otherwise disclosed in this annual report, no significant change has occurred since December 31, 2015.2016.

 

ITEM 9.THE OFFER AND LISTING

 

A.Offer and Listing Details

 

Annual Stock Information

 

The following table sets forth, for each of the years indicated, the high and low market prices of our ordinary shares on the NASDAQ Global Market (for periods prior to January 1, 2012), the NASDAQ Global Select Market (for periods subsequent to January 1, 2012) and the TASE:

 

   NASDAQ    Tel Aviv Stock
Exchange
 
Year  High    Low  High  Low 
                 
2011 $36.94  $14.01    NIS 130.52    NIS 52.65 
2012 $13.42  $2.16    NIS 53.86    NIS 9.07 
2013 $21.88  $3.68    NIS 76.38    NIS 13.78 
2014 $21.61  $12.76    NIS 84.46    NIS 45.25 
2015 $26.99  $14.08    NIS 105.00    NIS 54.48 

143

  NASDAQ  Tel Aviv Stock Exchange 
Year High  Low  High  Low 
             
2012 $13.42  $2.16   NIS 53.86   NIS 9.07 
2013 $21.88  $3.68   NIS 76.38   NIS 13.78 
2014 $21.61  $12.76   NIS 84.46   NIS 45.25 
2015 $26.99  $14.08   NIS 105.00   NIS 54.48 
2016 $31.86  $19.50   NIS 102.30   NIS 77.62 

 

Quarterly Stock Information

 

The following table sets forth, for each of the full financial quarters in the two most recent full financial years and any subsequent period, the high and low market prices of our ordinary shares on the NASDAQ Global Select Market and the TASE:

 

 NASDAQ Global Select
Market
  Tel Aviv Stock Exchange  NASDAQ Global Select
Market
  Tel Aviv Stock Exchange 
 High  Low  High  Low  High  Low  High  Low 
         
2014                
First Quarter $17.32  $12.76   NIS 60.45   NIS 45.25 
Second Quarter $19.71  $16.70   NIS 67.79   NIS 58.57 
Third Quarter $21.61  $17.88   NIS 74.00   NIS 61.65 
Fourth Quarter $21.09  $17.05   NIS 84.46   NIS 66.17 
                         
2015                         
First Quarter $17.75  $14.08   NIS 68.52   NIS 54.48  $17.75  $14.08   NIS 68.52   NIS 54.48 
Second Quarter $17.45  $14.31   NIS 69.84   NIS 54.87  $17.45  $14.31   NIS 69.84   NIS 54.87 
Third Quarter $20.95  $15.72   NIS 82.97   NIS 59.72  $20.95  $15.72   NIS 82.97   NIS 59.72 
Fourth Quarter $26.99  $19.55   NIS 105.00   NIS 74.04  $26.99  $19.55   NIS 105.00   NIS 74.04 
                                
2016                                
First Quarter $31.86  $23.71   NIS 116.40   NIS 92.90  $31.86  $23.71   NIS 102.30   NIS 81.64 
Second Quarter (through April 18) $31.00  $26.41   NIS 109.70   NIS 104.80 
Second Quarter $31.00  $21.60   NIS 96.67   NIS 84.40 
Third Quarter $25.57  $22.68   NIS 98.13   NIS 86.20 
Fourth Quarter $23.60  $19.50   NIS 89.86   NIS 77.62 
                
2017                
First Quarter $21.49  $18.58   NIS 84.84   NIS 70.19 
Second Quarter (through April 25) $20.16  $18.84   NIS 72.98   NIS 69.79 

125

 

Monthly Stock Information

 

The following table sets forth, for the most recent six months, the high and low market prices of our ordinary shares on the NASDAQ Global Select Market and the TASE:

 

   NASDAQ Global Select
Market
   Tel Aviv Stock Exchange 
   High   Low   High   Low 
                 
October 2015 $23.26  $19.55    NIS 94.66    NIS 74.04 
November 2015 $26.98  $23.09    NIS 105.00    NIS 89.30 
December 2015 $26.99  $23.51    NIS 103.20    NIS 95.70 
January 2016 $25.98  $23.71    NIS 102.60    NIS 92.90 
February 2016 $28.63  $27.00    NIS 110.00    NIS 100.40 
March 2016 $31.86  $28.42    NIS116.40    NIS108.00 
April 2016 (through April 18) $31.00  $26.41    NIS 109.70    NIS 104.80 
  NASDAQ Global Select
Market
  Tel Aviv Stock Exchange 
  High  Low  High  Low 
             
October 2016 $23.60  $22.00   NIS 89.86   NIS 84.94 
November 2016 $22.37  $20.53   NIS 87.14   NIS 77.90 
December 2016 $21.78  $19.50   NIS 84.80   NIS 77.62 
January 2017 $21.49  $18.65   NIS 84.84   NIS 72.00 
February 2017 $20.70  $18.58   NIS 75.82   NIS 71.36 
March 2017 $20.50  $19.18   NIS 76.19   NIS 70.19 
April 2017 (through April 25) $20.16  $18.84   NIS 72.98   NIS 69.79 

 

B.Plan of Distribution

 

Not applicable.

 

C.Markets

 

Our ordinary shares were listed on the NASDAQ Global Market in connection with our initial public offering on October 30, 2007 and since January 1, 2011, our ordinary shares have been listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market. Our ordinary shares have been traded on the TASE since November 14, 2007.

 

D.Selling Shareholders

 

Not applicable.

 

E.Dilution

 

Not applicable.

 

F.Expense of the Issue

 

Not applicable.

 

144

ITEM 10.ADDITIONALADDITIONAL INFORMATION

 

A.Share Capital

 

Not applicable.

 

B.Memorandum and Articles of Association

 

Below is a description of certain provisions of our Articles of Association and of the Israeli Companies Law related to such provisions. This description is only a summary and does not purport to be complete and is qualified by reference to the full text of the Articles of Association, of our company which has been filed as an exhibit to this Annual Report and which is incorporated by reference, and to Israeli law.

 

Purposes and Objects of the Company

 

We are a public company registered under the Israel Companies Law, 1999-5759, or the Israeli Companies Law, as B Communications Ltd., registration number 512832742. Our objects and purposes, as provided by our Articles of Association, are to carry on any lawful activity.

 

The Powers of the Directors

 

Under the provisions of the Israeli Companies Law and our Articles of Association, a director cannot participate in a meeting nor vote on a proposal, arrangement or contract in which he or she is materially interested unless such proposal, arrangement or contract is in the ordinary course of business or the majority of directors are personally interested in such proposal, arrangement or contract. In the event the majority of the members of the board of directors have a personal interest in the proposed transaction, approval of our shareholders at a general meeting is required. In addition, our directors cannot vote compensation to themselves or any members of their body without the approval of our compensation committee and, unless exempted under the regulations promulgated under the Israeli Companies Law, our shareholders at a general meeting. If the compensation of our directors is inconsistent with our stated compensation policy, then the approval of our shareholders requires that either:

 

at least a majority of the shares held by all shareholders who are not controlling shareholders and do not have a personal interest in such matter, present and voting at such meeting, are voted in favor of the compensation package, excluding abstentions; or

 

126

the total number of shares of non-controlling shareholders and shareholders who do not have a personal interest in such matter voting against the compensation package does not exceed 2% of the aggregate voting rights in the company.

 

The authority of our directors to enter into borrowing arrangements on our behalf is not limited, except in the same manner as any other transaction by us.

 

Under our Articles of Association, retirement of directors from office is not subject to any age limitation and our directors are not required to own shares in our company in order to qualify to serve as directors.

 

Rights Attached to Shares

 

Our authorized share capital consists of 50,000,000 ordinary shares of a nominal value of NIS 0.1 each. All of our issued and outstanding ordinary shares are duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable. Our ordinary shares are not redeemable and do not have preemptive rights.

 

Dividend and Liquidation Rights. The holders of the ordinary shares will be entitled to their proportionate share of any cash dividend, share dividend or dividend in kind declared with respect to our ordinary shares. Our board of directors may declare a dividend to be paid to the holders of ordinary shares in proportion to the paid up capital attributable to the shares that they hold. Dividends may only be paid out of our profits and other surplus funds, as defined in the Israeli Companies Law, as of the end of the most recent fiscal year or as accrued over a period of two years, whichever is higher, provided that there is no reasonable concern that a payment of a dividend will prevent us from satisfying our existing and foreseeable obligations as they become due. If we do not meet the profit requirement, we may seek the approval of the court to distribute a dividend. The court may approve our request if it is convinced that there is no reasonable risk that a distribution might prevent us from satisfying our existing and anticipated obligations as they become due.

 

Under the Israeli Companies Law, a dividend declaration must be approved by the board of directors and does not require the approval of the shareholders of a company unless the company’s articles of association provide otherwise. Our articles of association do not require shareholder approval of a dividend distribution.

 

In the event of our liquidation, after satisfaction of liabilities to creditors, our assets will be distributed to the holders of ordinary shares in proportion to the paid up capital attributable to the shares that they hold. Dividend and liquidation rights may be affected by the grant of preferential dividend or distribution rights to the holders of a class of shares with preferential rights that may be authorized in the future.

 

145

Exceptional Holdings; Principal Shareholders.Under the Communications Order, no person may hold, directly or indirectly, “significant influence” over Bezeq or 5% or more of any particular class of means of control in Bezeq, nor may any person, together with any other person, appoint, elect or dismiss the general manager of Bezeq or cause the election, appointment or dismissal of any director of Bezeq, without the prior written consent of the Prime Minister of Israel and the Israeli Minister of Communications. Subject to certain exceptions, prior written approval of such Ministers is also required to increase the holdings or other rights in excess of those determined in the initial approval, including by means of an agreement (including a voting agreement). Furthermore, under the Communications Order, no person may transfer control, “significant influence” or means of control in Bezeq to another, if, as a result of the transfer, the holdings of the transferee would require approval pursuant to the Communications Law or Communications Order and the transferee is not in possession of the requisite approval. Any such unauthorized acquisition is referred to as “Exceptional Holdings.” For the foregoing purposes, “significant influence” means the ability to significantly influence the activity of a corporation, whether alone or together with or through others, directly or indirectly, other than as a result of holding “means of control” in that corporation or in another corporation, and including ability derived from the corporation’s articles of association, a written, oral or other kind of agreement, or from any other source. In this context, the right to appoint an officer and holding 25% of our “means of control” is presumed to confer significant influence. “Means of control” means the right to vote at a general meeting of the company, to appoint a director or general manager of the company, to participate in the profits of the company or a share of the remaining assets of the company after payment of its debts upon liquidation.

 

In compliance with the Communications Law and Communications Order following our acquisition of the controlling interest in Bezeq, our Articles of Association provide that Exceptional Holdings will not entitle the holder to any rights in respect of such holdings, unless and to the extent permitted under the Communications Order. Accordingly, Exceptional Holdings will not have any voting rights at a general meeting of shareholders. Each shareholder participating in a general meeting of shareholders will be required to certify to us prior to the vote or, if the shareholder is voting by a proxy or any similar instrument, on such proxy card or similar instrument, as to whether or not his or her holdings in our company or his or her vote require the approval of the Prime Minister of Israel and the Israeli Minister of Communications, pursuant to the Communications Law and Communications Order. In addition, no director may be appointed, elected or removed from office by virtue of the vote of a holder of Exceptional Holdings. If a director is appointed, elected or removed from office by virtue of the vote of a holder of Exceptional Holdings, such appointment, election or removal from office shall have no effect.

127

 

Under our Articles of Association, any person holding a number of our shares that requires approval under the Communications Order shall notify us, Bezeq, the Prime Minister of Israel and the Israeli Minister of Communications of such holdings in writing, no later than 48 hours from the date of acquiring such holdings.

 

Our Articles of Association include reporting requirements applicable to “Principal Shareholders,” meaning a holder, directly or indirectly, of 5% of our issued and outstanding share capital. Any person who, after acquiring, directly or indirectly, shares in our company becomes a “Principal Shareholder,” is required, no later than 48 hours after becoming a Principal Shareholder, to notify us in writing, specifying the number of our shares held by such shareholder and the date on which such shareholder became a Principal Shareholder. Any person who ceases to be a Principal Shareholder is required, no later than 14 days thereafter, to notify us in writing of the date on which such person ceased to be a Principal Shareholder. In addition, a Principal Shareholder is required to notify us in writing of any aggregate change in its holdings of our shares in an aggregate amount equal to 1% or more of our outstanding share capital compared to the last notice of holdings submitted by such Principal Shareholder, no later than 48 hours after such change. In the event a Principal Shareholder fails to provide any required notice, as discussed above, then until such Principal Shareholder provides us with the requisite notice, the Principal Shareholder will not be entitled to any rights in respect of such shares and the provisions of the Communications Order with respect to the exercise of rights underlying Exceptional Holdings will apply, and the undisclosed holdings shall also be deemed “dormant shares,” as defined under the Israeli Companies Law.

 

Under our Articles of Associations, we are required to notify the Prime Minister of Israel and the Israeli Minister of Communications of any Exceptional Holdings immediately upon becoming aware of such event. We are also required to notify such Ministers in the event a shareholder becomes a Principal Shareholder and regarding any change in the holdings of a Principal Shareholder within 48 hours of becoming aware of such change.

 

Voting Rights. Holders of ordinary shares have one vote for each ordinary share held on all matters submitted to a vote of shareholders, subject to the restrictions described above relating to Exceptional Holdings and Principal Shareholders. Such voting rights may be affected by the grant of any special voting rights to the holders of a class of shares with preferential rights that may be authorized in the future.

146

 

Election of Directors

 

Our ordinary shares do not have cumulative rights for the election of directors. Rather, under our articles of association, our directors (other than the external directors) are elected by a vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power represented and voting at our annual general meetings of shareholders, and hold office until the next annual general meeting of shareholders and until their successors have been elected. See Item 6C. “Directors, Senior Management and Employees - Board Practices - Election of Directors.” Internet Gold, our controlling shareholder, is able to elect all of our directors other than our external directors. For information regarding the election of external directors, see Item 6C. “Directors, Senior Management and Employees - Board Practices - External directors.” All the members of our Board of Directors (except the external directors) may be reelected upon completion of their term of office.

 

Under our Articles of Association, provisions relating to the election and removal of directors who are not external directors, within the meaning of the Israeli Companies Law, may not be modified without the prior written consent of the Israeli Minister of Communications.

 

Regulations promulgated under the Communications Law require that our chief executive officer, any member of our board of directors holding an executive role, as well as a majority of the members of the board of directors, be citizens and residents of the State of Israel.

 

Annual and Extraordinary Meetings

 

Under the Israeli Companies Law and our articles of association, our board of directors must convene an annual meeting of shareholders at least once every calendar year and within 15 months of the last annual meeting. Depending on the matter to be voted upon, and subject to the Israeli Companies Law and regulations thereunder, notice of at least 14 days or 21 days or 35 days prior to the date of the meeting is required. Our articles of association provide that notice of a general meeting of shareholders will be delivered to all eligible shareholders by publication in two daily Hebrew language newspapers in Israel that have a reasonably-sized readership. Our board of directors may, in its discretion, convene additional meetings as “special general meetings.” In addition, the board must convene a special general meeting upon the demand of: (a) two of the directors or 25% of the directors in office, (b) one or more shareholders having at least 5% of the outstanding share capital and at least 1% of the voting power in the company, or (c) one or more shareholders having at least 5% of the voting power in the company. The chairman of the board of directors presides at each of our general meetings. The chairman of the board of directors is not entitled to a vote at a general meeting in his capacity as chairman.

 

128

Quorum

 

The quorum required for any general meeting is the presence, in person or by proxy, of shareholders holding or representing, in the aggregate, at least one third of the voting rights. No business shall be considered or determined at a general meeting, unless the requisite quorum is present within half an hour from the time designated for the general meeting. If within half an hour from the time designated for the general meeting a quorum is not present, the general meeting shall stand adjourned to the same day in the following week, at the same time and place, or to such other time as designated in the notice of such adjourned meeting. If within half an hour from the time designated for the adjourned meeting a quorum is not present, any number of shareholders present will constitute a quorum. However, if the general meeting was convened on the demand of shareholders, the adjourned meeting shall take place only if there are present at least the number of shareholders required to convene a general meeting under our articles of association (as discussed above).

 

A general meeting in which a quorum is present may resolve to adjourn the meeting, the discussion or the vote on a matter included in the agenda to such other time and place as it may determine. Only matters that were on the agenda and in respect of which no resolution was passed shall be discussed at the adjourned meeting.

 

Resolutions

 

An ordinary resolution requires approval by the holders of a simple majority of the voting rights represented at the meeting, in person, by proxy or by written ballot, and voting on the resolution.

 

Under the Israeli Companies Law, unless otherwise provided in the articles of association or applicable law, all resolutions of the shareholders require a simple majority. A resolution for the voluntary winding up of the company requires approval by holders of 75% of the voting rights represented at the meeting, in person, by proxy or by written ballot and voting on the resolution.

 

Modification of Class Rights

 

Under the Israeli Companies Law and our articles of association, any amendment, conversion, cancellation, expansion, addition to or other change in the rights, preferences, privileges, restrictions or provisions attached to any particular class of shares issued to shareholders of our company, shall require the written consent of holders of all issued shares of such particular class, or authorization by an ordinary resolution adopted at an extraordinary meeting of such class.

147

 

Limitations on the Rights to Own Ordinary Shares in Our Company

 

None of our memorandum of association, our articles of association or the laws of the State of Israel restrict in any way the ownership or voting of ordinary shares by non-residents, except that shares held by citizens of countries which are in a state of war with Israel will not confer any rights to their holders unless the Minister of Finance consents otherwise.

 

In addition, pursuant to the Communications Order, so long as we control Bezeq, any state, government corporation or a corporation controlled by a government corporation cannot control our company. Ownership of our shares, directly or indirectly, by a government corporation requires the prior written approval of the Israeli Prime Minister and Israeli Minister of Communications, provided that the government corporation’s total direct and indirect holdings in Bezeq does not exceed more than 5% of any type of “means of control” (as such term is described above) of Bezeq. Ownership by a government corporation, directly or indirectly, of 5% or more of Bezeq’s outstanding shares or a “significant influence” (as such term is described above) in Bezeq requires the approval of the Prime Minister of Israel and the Israeli Minister of Communications as well as the consent of the Israeli Minister of Defense. A “Hostile State,” as such term is defined in the Communications Order, a citizen or resident of a Hostile State, a corporation incorporated in a Hostile State or controlled by a resident or citizen of a Hostile State is not allowed to hold, directly or indirectly, 5% or more or a “significant influence” (as described above) in Bezeq.

 

Anti-Takeover Provisions; Mergers and Acquisitions

 

Full Tender Offer. A person wishing to acquire shares, or any class of shares, of a publicly traded Israeli company and who would as a result hold over 90% of the company’s issued and outstanding share capital, or a class of shares which are listed, is required by the Israeli Companies Law to make a tender offer to all of the company’s shareholders for the purchase of all of the remaining issued and outstanding shares of the company, or any class of shares, as the case may be. If (i) less than 5% of the outstanding shares are not tendered in the tender offer and the majority of the offerees who have no personal interest in the acceptance of the tender offer have accepted the offer; or (ii) less than 2% of the outstanding shares are not tendered in the tender offer, all of the shares that the acquirer offered to purchase will be transferred to the acquirer by operation of law. However, the shareholders may petition the court within six months after receipt of the offer to alter the consideration for the acquisition. The Israeli Companies Law allows an acquirer to determine in the terms of the offer that offerees who accepted the offer will not be entitled to appraisal rights. If the terms described above for the completion of a tender offer are not met, the acquirer may not acquire additional shares of the company from shareholders who accepted the tender offer if following such acquisition the acquirer would then own over 90% of the company’s issued and outstanding share capital.

129

 

Special Tender Offer. The Israeli Companies Law provides that an acquisition of shares of a public company be made by means of a special tender offer if as a result of the acquisition the purchaser would hold 25% or more of the voting rights at the company’s general meeting, unless one of the exemptions described in the Israeli Companies Law are met. This rule does not apply if there is already another shareholder who holds 25% or more of the voting rights at the company’s general meeting. Our parent, Internet Gold, currently holds more than 25% of our outstanding ordinary shares as determined in accordance with the Israeli Companies Law. Similarly, the Israeli Companies Law provides that an acquisition of shares in a public company must be made by means of a tender offer if as a result of the acquisition the purchaser would hold more than 45% of the voting rights of the company, if there is no other shareholder of the company who holds more than 45% of the voting rights in the company. A tender offer is not required in the following circumstances: (i) the purchase was made in a private placement that was approved by the shareholders as a private placement and was meant to grant the purchaser 25% or more of the voting rights of a company in which no other shareholder holds 25% or more of the voting rights, or to grant the purchaser more than 45% of the voting rights of a company in which no other shareholder holds more than 45% of the voting rights, (ii) the purchaser would hold 25% or more of the voting rights after purchasing shares from a person that held 25% or more of the voting rights, or (iii) the purchaser would hold more than 45% of the voting rights after purchasing shares from a person that held more than 45% of the voting rights.

 

Merger.The Israeli Companies Law permits merger transactions if approved by each party’s board of directors and, unless certain requirements described under the Israeli Companies Law are met, the majority of each party’s shares voted on the proposed merger at a shareholders’ meeting called on at least 35 days’ prior notice. Under the Israeli Companies Law, if the approval of a general meeting of the shareholders is required, merger transactions may be approved by holders of a simple majority of the shares present, in person or by proxy, at a general meeting and voting on the transaction. In determining whether the required majority has approved the merger, if shares of the company are held by the other party to the merger, or by any person holding at least 25% of the outstanding voting shares or 25% of the means of appointing directors of the other party to the merger, then a vote against the merger by holders of the majority of the shares present and voting, excluding shares held by the other party or by such person, or anyone acting on behalf of either of them, is sufficient to reject the merger transaction. If the transaction would have been approved but for the exclusion of the votes of certain shareholders as provided above, a court may still approve the merger upon the request of holders of at least 25% of the voting rights of a company, if the court holds that the merger is fair and reasonable, taking into account the value of the parties to the merger and the consideration offered to the shareholders. Upon the request of a creditor of either party to the proposed merger, the court may delay or prevent the merger if it concludes that there exists a reasonable concern that, as a result of the merger, the surviving company will be unable to satisfy the obligations of any of the parties to the merger and the court may also provide instructions to assure the rights of creditors. In addition, a merger may not be completed unless at least 50 days have passed from the date that a proposal for approval of the merger was filed with the Israeli Registrar of Companies and 30 days from the date that shareholder approval of both merging companies was obtained.

 

148

Notwithstanding the foregoing, a merger is not subject to shareholders approval of (i) the target company, if it is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the acquiring company and (ii) the acquiring company, if no changes are required to its articles and memorandum of association and it is not issuing to the shareholders of the target company more than 20% of its voting rights and no person will become, as a result of the issuance, a controlling shareholder of the acquiring company, subject to certain limitations relating to the continuing of the votes, at a meeting of the shareholders of a company that is a party to the merger, of any entity or person that is either the other party to the merger or a control person thereof.

 

C.Material Contracts

 

None.

 

D.Exchange Controls

 

Israeli laws and regulations do not impose any material foreign exchange restrictions on non-Israeli holders of our ordinary shares. In May 1998, a new “general permit” was issued under the Israeli Currency Control Law, 1978, which removed most of the restrictions that previously existed under such law, and enabled Israeli citizens to freely invest outside of Israel and freely convert Israeli currency into non-Israeli currencies.

 

Non-residents of Israel who purchase our ordinary shares will be able to convert dividends, if any, thereon, and any amounts payable upon our dissolution, liquidation or winding up, as well as the proceeds of any sale in Israel of our ordinary shares to an Israeli resident, into freely repatriable dollars, at the exchange rate prevailing at the time of conversion, provided that the Israeli income tax has been withheld (or paid) with respect to such amounts or an exemption has been obtained.

 

130

E.Taxation

 

The following is a discussion of Israeli and United States tax consequences material to our shareholders. To the extent that the discussion is based on tax legislation which has not been subject to judicial or administrative interpretation, the views expressed in the discussion might not be accepted by the tax authorities in question or by court. The discussion is not intended, and should not be construed, as legal or professional tax advice and does not exhaust all possible tax considerations.

 

IsraeliTax Considerations

 

The following summary describes the current tax structure applicable to companies in Israel, with special reference to its effect on us. The following discussion also summarizes the material Israeli income tax consequences applicable to the purchase, ownership and disposition of our ordinary shares. This discussion does not address all of the tax consequences that may be relevant to purchasers of our ordinary shares in light of their particular circumstances, or certain types of purchasers of our ordinary shares subject to special tax treatment. Examples of this kind of investor include residents of Israel and traders in securities who are subject to special tax regimes not covered in this discussion. Each individual/entity should consult its own tax or legal advisor as to the Israeli tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of our ordinary shares. To the extent that part of the discussion is based on new tax legislation, which has not been subject to judicial or administrative interpretation, we cannot assure that the tax authorities or the courts will accept the views expressed in this section.

 

General Corporate Tax Structure

 

The applicable Israeli company income tax rate was 25% in 2012 and 2013. In 2014 and 2015, the applicable income tax rate increased to 26.5% and commencing on January 1, 2016, the tax rate was reduced to 25%.

 

149

Tax on Capital Gains of Shareholders

 

Israeli law imposes a capital gains tax on the sale of capital assets by an Israeli resident and on the sale of capital assets located in Israel or the sale of direct or indirect rights to assets located in Israel, including on the sale of our Shares by some of our shareholders (see discussion below). The Israeli Income Tax Ordinance distinguishes between “Real Gain” and “Inflationary Surplus.”Surplus”. Real Gain is the excess of the total capital gain over Inflationary Surplus computed on the basis of the increase in the CPI between the date of purchase and the date of sale. In 2012, the Real Gain accrued on the sale of our Shares is generally taxed at a rate of 25% for corporations (24% in 2011) and a rate of 25% for individuals (20% in 2011).Additionally, if such individual shareholder is considered a “Significant Shareholder” at any time during the 12-month period preceding such sale (i.e. if such individual shareholder holds directly or indirectly, along with others, at least 10% of any means of control in the company), the tax rate will be 30% (25% in 2011).However, the foregoing tax rates will not apply to (i) dealers in securities; and (ii) shareholders who have acquired their shares prior to an initial public offering (that may be subject to a different tax arrangement). Inflationary surplus that accrued after December 31, 1993, is exempt from tax. Generally, a semi-annual detailed return, including a computation of the tax due should be submitted to the Israeli Tax Authorities and a tax advance amounting to the tax liability arising from the capital gain is payable. At the sale of traded securities, the aforementioned detailed return may not be submitted and the tax advance should not be paid, if all tax due was withheld at the source according to applicable provisions of the Israeli Tax Ordinance and regulations promulgated thereunder. Capital gains are also reportable on annual income tax returns.

 

Individuals

As of January 1, 2012, a shareholder will generally be subject to tax at 25% rate on realized real capital gain (if the shareholder is a Significant Shareholder, as defined above, the tax rate will be 30%). To the extent that the shareholder claims a deduction of financing expenses, the gain will be subject to tax at a rate of 30% (until otherwise stipulated in bylaws that may be published in the future).

 

Taxation of Non-Israeli Shareholders

 

Taxation of Non-Israeli Shareholders on Receipt of Dividends

 

Non-residents of Israel are generally subject to Israeli income tax on the receipt of dividends paid on our ordinary shares at the rate of 25%, which tax will be withheld at source, unless a different rate is provided in a treaty between Israel and the shareholder’s country of residence.

 

However, the tax rate on dividends paid to a “substantial shareholder” (a shareholder who alone, or together with another person, holds, directly or indirectly, at least 10% in one or all of any of the means of control in the corporation) is 30%.

131

 

Under the U.S.-Israel Tax Treaty, the maximum rate of tax withheld in Israel on dividends paid to a holder of our ordinary shares who is a U.S. resident (within the meaning of the U.S.-Israel Tax Treaty) is 25%. Furthermore, the maximum rate of withholding tax on dividends that are paid to a U.S. corporation holding 10% or more of our outstanding voting capital during the part of the tax year that precedes the date of the payment of the dividend and during the whole of its prior tax year, is 12.5%. This reduced rate will not apply if more than 25% of the Israeli company’s gross income consists of interest or dividends, other than dividends or interest received from a subsidiary corporation 50% or more of the outstanding shares of the voting shares of which are owned by the company. Investors should consult their own tax advisors to determine if they are eligible for benefits under the U.S. Israel Tax Treaty.

 

A non-resident of Israel who receives dividends from which tax was fully paid is generally exempt from the duty to file returns in Israel in respect of such income, provided such income was not derived from a business conducted in Israel by the taxpayer, and the taxpayer has no other taxable sources of income in Israel.

 

Upon a distribution of dividend the following withholding tax rates will apply: (i) Israeli resident corporations - 0%, (ii) Israeli resident individuals - 25% and (iii) non-Israeli residents (whether an individual or a corporation) - 25%, subject to a reduced tax rate under the provisions of an applicable double tax treaty, provided that a certificate from the Israeli Tax Authorities allowing for a reduced withholding tax rate is obtained in advance.

 

Capital Gains Taxes Applicable to Non-Israeli Shareholders

 

Israeli law imposes a capital gains tax on the sale of capital assets. The law distinguishes between real gain and inflationary surplus. The inflationary surplus is the portion of the total capital gain that is equivalent to the increase of the relevant asset’s purchase price (net of depreciation) which is attributable to the increase in the Israeli CPI between the date of purchase and the date of sale. Foreign residents who purchased an asset in foreign currency may request that the inflationary surplus be computed on the basis of the depreciation of the NIS against such foreign currency. The real gain is the excess of the total capital gain over the inflationary surplus. The inflationary surplus accumulated from and after December 31, 1993, is exempt from any capital gains tax in Israel while the real gain is taxed at the applicable rate discussed above.

 

Dealers in securities in Israel are taxed at regular tax rates applicable to business income.

 

Under the convention between the United States and Israel concerning taxes on income, Israeli capital gains tax will not apply to the sale, exchange or disposition of ordinary shares by a person:

 

who qualifies as a resident of the United States within the meaning of the U.S.-Israel tax treaty; and

 

who is entitled to claim the benefits available to the person by the U.S.-Israel tax treaty.

 

150

However, this exemption does not apply, among other cases, if the gain is attributable to a permanent establishment of such person in Israel, or if the holder is a resident of the United States within the meaning of the U.S.-Israeli tax treaty who holds, directly or indirectly, shares representing 10% or more of our voting power during any part of the 12-month period preceding the sale, exchange or disposition, subject to specified conditions. Under these circumstances, the sale, exchange or disposition would be subject to Israeli tax, to the extent applicable. However, under the U.S.-Israel tax treaty, a U.S. resident generally would be permitted to claim a credit for the Israeli taxes paid against the U.S. federal income tax imposed on the sale, exchange or disposition, subject to the limitations under U.S. law applicable to foreign tax credits. The U.S.-Israel tax treaty does not relate to U.S. state or local taxes.

 

Under Israeli law, the capital gain from the sale of shares by non-Israeli residents is tax exempt in Israel provided that, in general, both of the following conditions are met: (A) the capital gain is not attributed to the foreign resident’s permanent establishment in Israel, (B) if the seller is a corporation, less than 25% of its means of control are held by Israeli residents.

 

The purchaser of the shares, the stockbrokers who effected the transaction or the financial institution holding the shares through which payment to the seller is made are obligated, subject to the above-referenced exemptions if certain conditions are met, to withhold tax on the Real Gain resulting from a sale of shares at the rate of 25%.

 

UNITED STATES FEDERAL INCOME TAXATIONUnited States Federal Income Taxation

 

The following is a summarydescription of certainthe material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of our ordinary shares. This description addresses only the U.S. federal income tax considerations that are relevant to U.S. Holders (as defined below) who hold our ordinary shares as capital assets. This summary is based on the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder, judicial and administrative interpretations thereof, and the U.S.-Israel Tax Treaty, or the Treaty, all as in effect on the date hereof and all of which are subject to change either prospectively or retroactively. There can be no assurance that the U.S. Internal Revenue Service, or the IRS, will not take a different position concerning the tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of our ordinary shares or that such a position would not be sustained. This description does not address all tax considerations that may be relevant with respect to an investment in our ordinary shares. This summarydescription does not account for the specific circumstances of any particular investor, such as:

 

dealers or traders in securities, commodities or currencies;broker-dealers,

 132 

real estate investment trusts, regulated investment companies or grantor trusts;
financial institutions, and

certain insurance companies;companies,

investors liable for alternative minimum tax,

tax-exempt organizations;organizations,

certain former citizens or residentsnon-resident aliens of the United States;
U.S. Holders (as defined below)States or taxpayers whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar;dollar,

persons who hold the ordinary shares through partnerships or other pass-through entities;entities,

 

persons who acquire their ordinary shares through the exercise or cancellation of employee stock options or otherwise as compensation for services;services,

investors that actually or constructively own 10% or more of our shares by vote or value, orand

 

investors holding ordinary shares as part of a straddle, an appreciated financial position, a hedging transaction or a conversion transaction.

Moreover, this description does not address the U.S. federal estate, gift, or alternative minimum tax consequences, or any U.S. state, local or non-U.S. tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of our ordinary shares. Holders should consult their own tax advisers concerning the U.S. federal, state, local and foreign tax consequences of acquiring, owning and disposing of our ADSs and warrants in their particular circumstances.

 

If a partnership or an entity treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes owns ordinary shares, the U.S. federal income tax treatment of a partner in such a partnership will generally depend upon the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. A partnership that owns ordinary shares and the partners in such partnership should consult their tax advisors about the U.S. federal income tax consequences of holding and disposing of ordinary shares.

 

This summary does not address the effect of any U.S. federal taxation (such as estate and gift tax) other than U.S. federal income taxation. In addition, this summary does not include any discussion of state, local or non-U.S. taxation. You are urged to consult your tax advisors regarding the non-U.S. and U.S. federal, state and local tax consequences of an investment in ordinary shares.

151

 

For purposes of this summary, a U.S. Holder is:

 

an individual who is a citizen or, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, a resident of the United States;

 

a corporation or other entity taxable as a corporation created or organized in or under the laws of the United States or any political subdivision thereof;

 

an estate whose income is subject to U.S. federal income tax regardless of its source; or

 

a trust that (a) is subject to the primary supervision of a court within the United States and the control of one or more U.S. persons or (b) has a valid election in effect under applicable U.S. Treasury regulations to be treated as a U.S. person.

 

A “Non-U.S. Holder” is a beneficial owner ofUnless otherwise indicated, this discussion assumes that our ordinary shares thatcompany is not, and will not become, a “passive foreign investment company,” or a PFIC, for U.S. Holder.federal income tax purposes. See “—Passive Foreign Investment Companies” below.

133

 

Taxation of Dividends and Other Distributions on Our Ordinary Shares

 

Subject to limitations, including the discussion below under the heading “—Passive Foreign Investment Companies,” the gross amount of any distributions received with respect to our ordinary shares, including the amount of any Israeli taxes withheld therefrom, will constitute dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits, as determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Because we do not expect to maintain calculations of our earnings and profits under U.S. federal income tax principles, it is expected that the entire amount of any distribution will generally be reported as dividend income to you. Dividends are included in gross income as ordinary income. Distributions in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits willwould be treated as a non-taxable return of capital to the extent of your tax basis in our ordinary shares and any amount in excess of your tax basis will be treated as capital gain from the sale of ordinary shares. See “—Disposition of Ordinary Shares” below for a discussion of the taxation of capital gains. Our dividends willwould not qualify for the dividends-received deduction generally available to corporations under section 243 of the Code.

 

Dividends that we pay in NIS, including the amount of any Israeli taxes withheld therefrom, will be included in your income in a U.S. dollar amount calculated by reference to the exchange rate in effect on the day such dividends are distributed,received, regardless of whether the payment is in fact converted into U.S. dollars. A U.S. Holder who receives payment in NIS and converts NIS into U.S. dollars at an exchange rate other than the rate in effect on such day may have a foreign currency exchange gain or loss that would generally be treated as U.S.-source ordinary income or loss. If dividends received in NIS are converted into U.S. dollars on the day they are received, a U.S. Holder generally should not be required to recognize foreign currency gain or loss in respect of the dividend.

U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisors concerning the U.S. tax consequences of acquiring, holding and disposing of NIS and converting NIS into U.S. dollars.NIS.

 

Subject to complex limitations, some of which vary depending upon the U.S. Holder’s circumstances, any Israeli withholding tax imposed on dividends paid with respect to our ordinary shares will be a foreign source income tax that is eligible for credit against a U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability (or, alternatively, for deduction against U.S. income tax in determining such tax liability). The limitation on foreign income taxes eligible for credit is calculated separately with respect to specific classes of income. Dividends generally arewill be treated as foreign-source passive category income or, in the case of certain U.S. Holders, general category income for purposes of computing the U.S. foreign tax credit.credit purposes. Further, there are special rules for computing the foreign tax credit limitation of a taxpayer who receives dividends subject to a reduced tax rate (see discussion below). A U.S. Holder may be denied a foreign tax credit with respect to Israeli income tax withheld from dividends received on our ordinary shares to the extentif such U.S. Holder has not held the ordinary shares for at least 16 days of the 31-dayfails to satisfy certain minimum holding period beginning on the date which is 15 days before the ex-dividend daterequirements or to the extent such U.S. Holder is under an obligation to make related payments with respect to substantially similar or related property.  Any days during which a U.S. Holder has substantially diminished its risk of loss on theholder’s position in ordinary shares are not counted toward meeting the 16-day holding period required by the statute.is hedged. The U.S. rules relating to the determination of the foreign tax credit are complex, and you should consult with your ownpersonal tax advisors to determine whether and to what extent you would be entitled to this credit.

 

Subject to certain limitations, “qualified dividend income” received by a non-corporate U.S. Holder will be subject to tax at the lower long-term capital gain rates (currently a maximum ofat 20%). Distributions taxable as dividends paid on our ordinary shares should qualify for a reduced rate provided that either: (i) we are entitled to benefits under the Treaty or (ii) our ordinary shares are readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States and certain other requirements are met. We believe that we are entitled to benefits under the Treaty and that our ordinary shares currently are readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States. However, no assurance can be given that our ordinary shares will remain readily tradable. The reduced rate reduction does not apply unless certain holding period requirements are satisfied.  With respect to the ordinary shares, the U.S. Holder must have held such shares for at least 61 days during the 121-day period beginning 60 days before the ex-dividend date.  The reduced rate alsosatisfied, nor does notit apply to dividends received from a PFIC (see discussion below), or in respect of certain hedged positions,risk-reduction transactions or in certain other situations. The legislation enacting the reduced tax rate on qualified dividend income contains special rules for computing the foreign tax credit limitation of a taxpayer who receives dividends subject to the reduced tax rate. U.S. Holders of our ordinary shares should consult their own tax advisors regarding the effect of these rules in their particular circumstances.

 

152

Sale or other Disposition of Ordinary Shares

 

If you sell or otherwise dispose of our ordinary shares, you will generally recognize gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes in an amount equal to the difference between the amountamounts realized on the sale or other disposition and your adjusted tax basis in our ordinary shares. Subject to the discussion below under the heading “Passive Foreign Investment Companies,” suchshares, in each case determined in U.S. dollars. Such gain or loss will generally be capital gain or loss and will be long-term capital gain or loss if you have held the ordinary shares for more than one year at the time of the sale or other disposition. Long-term capital gain realized by a non-corporate U.S. Holder is generally eligible for a preferential tax rate (currently a maximum ofat 20%). In general, any gain that you recognize on the sale or other disposition of ordinary shares will be U.S.-source for purposes of the foreign tax credit limitation; losses will generally be allocated against U.S. source income. Deduction of capital losses is subject to certain limitations under the Code.

 

In the case of a cash basis U.S. Holder who receives NIS in connection with the sale or disposition of our ordinary shares, the amount realized will be based on the U.S. dollar value of the NIS received with respect to the ordinary shares as determined on the settlement date of such sale of other disposition.exchange. A cash basis U.S. Holder who receives payment in NIS and converts NIS into U.S. dollars at a conversion rate other than the rate in effect on the settlement date may have a foreign currency exchange gain or loss, which would generally be treated as ordinary income or loss. A foreign tax credit for foreign taxes imposed on capital gains may be denied if you do not satisfy certain minimum holding period requirements. The rules relating to the determination of the foreign tax credit are complex, and it is possible that the ability of a U.S. Holder to claim a foreign tax credit for any such Israeli tax will be limited. You should consult your tax advisor to determine whether, and to what extent, you will be entitled to this credit.

134

 

An accrual basis U.S. Holder may elect the same treatment required of cash basis taxpayers with respect to foreign currency gain or loss realized on a sale or disposition of our ordinary shares that are traded on an established securities market, provided that the election is applied consistently from year to year. Such election may not be changed without the consent of the IRS. In the event that an accrual basis U.S. Holder does not elect to be treated as a cash basis taxpayer for this purpose (pursuant to the Treasury regulations applicable to foreign currency transactions), such U.S. Holder may have a foreign currency gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes because of differences between the U.S. dollar value of the currency received prevailing on the trade date and the settlement date. Any such foreign currency gain or loss would be treated as ordinary income or loss and would be in addition to the gain or loss, if any, recognized by such U.S. Holder on the sale or other disposition of oursuch ordinary shares.

Any foreign currency gain or loss a U.S. Holder realizes will generally be U.S. source ordinary income or loss.

The U.S. rules relating to foreign currency gains and losses are complex, and you should consult with your tax advisor to determine whether and to what extent you would have to recognize such foreign currency gains or losses.

 

Passive Foreign Investment Companies

 

IfWe believe that we were to be classified as a PFIC, in any taxable year, a U.S. Holder would be subject to special rules intended to reduce or eliminate any benefits from the deferral of U.S. federal income tax that a U.S. Holder could otherwise derive from investing in a non-U.S. company that does not distribute all of its earnings on a current basis.  We will be treated as a PFIC for any taxable year in which either (i) 75% or more of our gross income is passive income, or (ii) at least 50% of the average value of all of our assets for the taxable year produce or are held for the production of passive income. For this purpose, passive income generally includes dividends, interest, royalties, rents, annuities and the excess of gains over losses from the disposition of assets that produce passive income. Included in the calculation of our income and assets for this purpose is our proportionate share of the income and assets of each corporation in which we own, directly or indirectly, at least a 25% interest, by value. If we were determined to be a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes unfavorable and highly complex rules would apply to you as a U.S. Holderfor the taxable year of ordinary shares, whether you own your ordinary shares directly or indirectly. Accordingly, you are urged to consult your own tax advisors regarding the application of such rules.

Based on our current and projected income, assets and activities, we believe that we are not currently a2016. However, since PFIC nor do we expect to become a PFIC in the foreseeable future.  However, because the determination of whether we are a PFIC is basedstatus depends upon the composition of our income and assets and the market value of our assets from time to time, there can be no assurancesassurance that we will not becomebe considered a PFIC infor any future taxable year.

153

If we are treated aswere a PFIC for any taxable year dividendsduring which a U.S. Holder owned an ordinary share (and under proposed Treasury regulations, a right), certain adverse consequences could apply to the U.S. Holder. Specifically, gain recognized by a U.S. Holder on a sale or other disposition of such ordinary share (or right) would be allocated ratably over the U.S. Holder’s holding period for the ordinary share (or right). The amounts allocated to the taxable year of the sale or other disposition and to any year before we became a PFIC would be taxed as ordinary income. The amount allocated to each other taxable year would be subject to tax at the highest rate in effect for individuals or corporations, as appropriate, for that taxable year, and an interest charge would be imposed on the resulting tax liability. Further, any distribution in excess of 125% of the average of the annual distributions received by the U.S. Holder on our ordinary shares would not qualify forduring the reduced tax rate on qualified dividend income, discussed above, and, unless you elect to “mark to market” your ordinary shares, as described below:

youpreceding three years or the U.S. Holder’s holding period, whichever is shorter, would be required to allocate income recognized upon receiving certain dividends or gain recognized upon the disposition of ordinary shares ratably over your holding period for such ordinary shares,

the amount allocated to the current taxable year, and to any taxable years in your holding period prior to the first day in which we were treated as a PFIC will be treated as ordinary income in the current year, and

the amount allocated to each prior taxable year during which we are considered a PFIC would be subject to tax at the highest individual or corporate tax rate, as the case may be, for that year and an interest charge would be imposed with respect to the resulting tax liability allocated to each such year.

If we are a PFIC and any of our non-U.S. subsidiaries is also a PFIC, you will generally be treated as owning a proportionate amount (by value) of the underlying shares of each such subsidiary PFIC. We do not intend to provide the information necessary for U.S. Holders to make qualified electing fund elections if we are classified as a PFIC.

A U.S. Holder may make a mark-to-market election only if our ordinary shares are “regularly traded” on a “qualified exchange.”  In general, our ordinary shares will be treated as “regularly traded” for a given calendar year if more than ade minimis quantity of our ordinary shares is traded on a qualified exchange on at least 15 days during each calendar quarter of such calendar year.  Our ordinary shares are listed on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange and the NASDAQ. However, no assurance can be given that our ordinary shares will be regularly traded for purposes of the mark-to-market election.  In addition, because a mark-to-market election cannot be made for a subsidiary PFIC, if you make a mark-to-market election you may continue to be subject to thetaxation as described immediately above. Certain elections (such as a mark-to-market election) may be available to U.S. Holders and may result in alternative tax treatment. In addition, if we were a PFIC rules with respect to your indirect interest in any PFICs we own.

If you elect to mark to market your ordinary shares, you will generally include in income, in eachfor a taxable year in which we are consideredpay a PFIC, any excess ofdividend or the fair market value of your ordinary shares atprior taxable year, the close of each tax year over your adjusted basis in the ordinary shares. If the fair market value of the ordinary shares has depreciated below your adjusted basis at the close of the tax year, you may generally deduct the excess of the adjusted basis of the ordinary shares over their fair market value at that time. However, such deductions would generally be limited to the net mark-to-market gains, if any, that you included in incomefavorable dividend rates discussed above with respect to such ordinary shares in prior years. Your adjusted tax basis in your ordinary sharesdividends paid to certain non-corporate U.S. Holders would be increased by the amount ofnot apply. If we were a PFIC for any income inclusion and decreased by the amount of any deductions under the mark-to-market rules.  Income recognized and deductions allowed under the mark-to-market provisions, as well as any gain or loss on the disposition of ordinary shares with respect to which the mark-to-market election has been made, in ataxable year in which we are classified as a PFIC,U.S. Holder owned our shares, the U.S. Holder would be treated as ordinary income or loss (except that loss on a disposition of ordinary shares is treated as capital loss to the extent the loss exceeds the net mark-to-market gains, if any, that you included in income with respect to such ordinary shares in prior years). The source of such gain or loss would be U.S.-source for purposes of the foreign tax credit limitation.  Gain or loss from the disposition of ordinary shares (as to which a mark-to-market election was made) in a year in which we are no longer classified as a PFIC, would be capital gain or loss.

If you own our ordinary shares during any year in which we are a PFIC, you maygenerally be required to file anannual returns with the Internal Revenue Service, or the IRS, on IRS Form 8621 with respect to our company, typically with your federal income tax return for that year.  U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding whether we are a PFIC and the potential application of the PFIC rules to them, including the application of the mark-to-market election.8621.

 

NetAdditional Tax on Investment Income Tax

 

In addition to the income taxes described above, U.S. Holders that are individuals, estates or trusts and whose income exceeds certain thresholds will be subject to a 3.8% Medicare contribution tax on net investment income, which includes dividends and capital gains.

Certain Reporting Requirements with Respect to Payments of Offer Price

U.S. Holders paying more than $100,000 for our ordinary shares generally will be required to file IRS Form 926 reporting the payment of the Offer Price for our ordinary shares to us. Substantial penalties may be imposed upon a U.S. Holder that fails to comply. Each U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor as to the possible obligation to file IRS Form 926.

 

Backup Withholding and Information Reporting

 

Payments in respect of our ordinary shares may be subject to information reporting to the IRS and to U.S. backup withholding tax at the rate (currently) of 28%. Backup withholding will not apply, however, if you (i) are a corporation or fall within certain exempt categories, and demonstrate the fact when so required, or (ii) furnish a correct taxpayer identification number and make any other required certification.

 

154

Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules may be credited against youra U.S. Holder’s U.S. tax liability. YouA U.S. Holder may obtain a refund of any excess amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules by filing the appropriate claim for refund with the IRS.

Foreign Asset Reporting

 

U.S. citizens and individuals taxable as resident aliens of the United States that own “specified foreign financial assets” with an aggregate value in a taxable year in excess of certain thresholds (as determined under rules in Treasury regulations) and that are required to file a U.S. federal income tax return generally will be required to file an information report with respect to those assets with their tax returns. IRS Form 8938 has been issued for that purpose. “Specified foreign financial assets” include any financial accounts maintained by foreign financial institutions, foreign stocks held directly, and interests in foreign estates, foreign pension plans or foreign deferred compensation plans. Under those rules, our ordinary shares, whether owned directly or through a financial institution, estate or pension or deferred compensation plan, would be “specified foreign financial assets.”assets”. Under Treasury regulations, the reporting obligation applies to certain U.S. entities that hold, directly or indirectly, specified foreign financial assets. Penalties can apply if there is a failure to satisfy this reporting obligation. A U.S. Holder is urged to consult his tax adviser regarding its reporting obligation.

 

AnyU.S. Holders that transfer more than $100,000 to us within a twelve-month period, through direct purchase of ordinary shares or otherwise, generally will be required to file IRS Form 926. Substantial penalties may be imposed upon a U.S. Holder who holds 10% or more in vote or valuethat fails to comply. Each U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor about the obligation to file IRS Form 926.

135

The above description is not intended to constitute a complete analysis of all tax consequences relating to acquisition, ownership and disposition of our ordinary shares will be subject to certain additional U.S. information reporting requirements.shares. You should consult your tax advisor concerning the tax consequences of your particular situation.

 

F.Dividends and Paying Agents

 

Not applicable.

 

G. Statement by Experts

G.Statement by Experts

 

Not applicable.

 

H.Documents on Display

 

We are subject to certain of the reporting requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, as applicable to “foreign private issuers” as defined in Rule 3b-4 under the Exchange Act. As a foreign private issuer, we are exempt from certain provisions of the Exchange Act. Accordingly, our proxy solicitations are not subject to the disclosure and procedural requirements of Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act, and transactions in our equity securities by our officers and directors are exempt from reporting and the “short-swing” profit recovery provisions contained in Section 16 of the Exchange Act. In addition, we are not required under the Exchange Act to file periodic reports and financial statements as frequently or as promptly as U.S. companies whose securities are registered under the Exchange Act. However, we file with the SEC an annual report on Form 20-F containing financial statements audited by an independent accounting firm. We also submit to the SEC reports on Form 6-K containing (among other things) press releases and unaudited financial information. We post our annual report on Form 20-F on our website (www.bcommunications.co.il) promptly following the filing of our annual report with the SEC. The information on our website is not incorporated by reference into this annual report.

 

This annual report and the exhibits thereto and any other document we file pursuant to the Exchange Act may be inspected without charge and copied at prescribed rates at the SEC public reference room at 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the SEC’s public reference room in Washington, D.C. by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The Exchange Act file number for our SEC filings is 001-33773.

 

The SEC maintains a website atwww.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding registrants that make electronic filings with the SEC using its EDGAR (Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval) system.

 

The documents concerning our company referred to in this annual report may also be inspected at our offices located at 2 Dov Friedman Street, Ramat Gan 5250301, Israel. We will provide a copy of this annual report containing our financial statements upon shareholders’ request.

 

I.155Subsidiary Information

I. Subsidiary Information

 

Not applicable.

 

ITEM 11.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISKS

 

We are exposed to a variety of risks, including foreign currency fluctuations and changes in interest rates. We regularly assess currency and interest rate risks to minimize any adverse effects on our business as a result of those factors.

 

Effects of Currency Fluctuations

 

Our unconsolidated net exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates (primarily the U.S. dollar) was NIS 277169 million (approximately $71$44 million) at December 31, 2015. The exposure primarily consists of the outstanding balance of $773.1 million par value Senior Secured notes. As at December 31, 2015, we held 5 Cross Currency Swap hedge transaction in the amount of $725 million that partially hedged our exposure with regards to our Senior Secured Notes and NIS 464 million (approximately $119 million) of marketable securities denomininated in foreign currencies (primarily the U.S. dollar).2016. Each increase or decrease of 1% in the NIS-US$ exchange rate will result in an increase or decrease in our yearly financial income of NIS 32 million ($1(approximately $1 million).

 

The Bezeq Group is exposed to foreign currency risks mainly due to payments for purchases of terminal equipment and property, plant and equipment which are in or linked to the U.S. dollar or the Euro. In addition, the Bezeq Group provides services for customers and receives services from suppliers worldwide for which it is paid and it pays in foreign currency, mainly the U.S. dollar. The Bezeq Group has surplus liabilities over assets in foreign currency. To hedge its exposure, the Bezeq Group makes forward transactions against the U.S. dollar.

 

136

Bezeq Group holds derivative financial instruments to hedge its exposure to foreign currency. Hedge accounting is not applied to these derivative instruments that economically hedge financial assets and liabilities. Derivative instruments are recognized initially at fair value; attributable transaction costs are recognized in the statement of income as incurred. Subsequent to initial recognition, derivative financial instruments are measured at fair value and the changes in fair value are recognized in the statement of income as incurred.

 

Bezeq'sBezeq’s total net exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates was NIS 995 million1.1 billion (approximately $255$286 million) at December 31, 2015.2016. Each increase or decrease of 1% in the NIS-US$ exchange rate will result in an increase or decrease in Bezeq'sBezeq’s yearly financial incomeloss of NIS 107 million ($32 million).

 

Effects of Changes in the Israeli Consumer Price Index

 

Our total net exposure to changes in the Israeli CPI was NIS 564 million (approximately $14 million)$1 million at December 31, 2015. The exposure primarily consists of a tax liability in the amount of NIS 79 million (approximately $20 million). As of December 31, 2015, we also hold forward contracts based on the Israeli CPI in the amount of NIS 70 million (approximately $18 million) and NIS 65 million (approximately $17 million) of CPI linked marketable securities.2016).. Each increase or decrease of 1% in the Israeli CPI will result in an increase or decrease in our yearly financial income of NIS 1nil million.

 

The Bezeq Group’s total exposure to changes in the Israeli CPI was NIS 75.5 billion (approximately $1.8$1.4 billion) at December 31, 2015.2016. The exposure primarily consists of Bezeq'sBezeq’s debentures which are linked to the CPI. As of December 31, 2015,2016, Bezeq holds forward contracts on the Israeli CPI in the amount of NIS 2 billion (approximately $518$519 million). Each increase or decrease of 1% in the Israeli CPI will result in an increase or decrease in the Bezeq Group'sGroup’s yearly financial expense of NIS 50 million ($713 million).

 

Cash Investments, Marketable Securities and Interest Rate Risk Management

 

Our cash investment policy seeks to preserve principal and maintain adequate liquidity while maximizing the income we receive from our investments without significantly increasing the risk of loss. To minimize investment risk, we maintain a diversified portfolio across various maturities, types of investments and issuers, which may include, from time to time, money market funds, U.S. government bonds, state debt, bank deposits and certificates of deposit, and investment grade corporate debt. As of December 31, 2015,2016, we had NIS 181114 million ($4630 million) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, and NIS 772321 million ($19883 million) in short term investments.

 

The performance of the capital markets affects the values of the funds we hold in marketable securities. These assets are subject to market fluctuations, such as the decreases experienced in 2008 and the first six months of 2009. In such case, the fair value of our investments may decrease. We periodically monitor our investments for adverse material holdings related to the underlying financial solvency of the issuers of the marketable securities in our portfolio.

156

 

Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our investment in marketable securities. Investments in both fixed rate and floating rate interest bearing securities carry a degree of interest rate risk. The fair market value of fixed rate securities may be adversely impacted due to a rise in interest rates, while floating rate securities may produce less income than predicted if interest rates fall. Due in part to these factors, our future financial results may be negatively affected in the event that interest rates fluctuate.

 

Bezeq’s Exposure to Market Risks

 

Bezeq is exposed to market risks, mainly as a result of changes in interest rates, exchange rates, inflation, the prices of raw materials and equipment, and the prices of securities. Bezeq seeks to hedge against such risks in accordance with a financial exposure management policy adopted by its Board of Directors. Pursuant to that policy, Bezeq takes partial hedging actions depending on the circumstances and its own judgment, primarily for reducing its exposure to changes in the Israeli CPI and foreign currency exchange rates. Bezeq monitors and reviews the Bezeq Group’s exposure management every month, including, when necessary, making recommendations for change, if required, in the exposure management.

 

Bezeq has a significant surplus of liabilities for CPI linked assets, and the bulk of its financial exposure from the risk of a rise in inflation. The rate of inflation also affects Bezeq’s operating income and operating expenses in the course of the year. In addition, Bezeq’s tariff updating mechanism, which is subject to government regulation, is reviewed once a year and is influenced by the CPI. As a result, the annual rate of inflation and its distribution during the year can have a material influence on the erosion of Bezeq’s tariffs and its revenues and expenses during the year.

 

Bezeq’s exposure to change in the interest rate largely depends on the character of its financial liabilities and assets as well as future financing needs. Most of Bezeq’s debt bears fixed interest, and therefore a change in the interest rate will affect its fair value rather than its carrying value.

 

Bezeq has investments in negotiable bonds that are stated in its books at their market value. This market value is influenced by changes in the interest rates in the economy. In addition, a change in the NIS exchange rate constitutes economic exposure that can affect Bezeq’s future profit and cash flows, mainly the repayment of currency-linked liabilities and payments for currency-linked purchases of equipment and raw materials.

 

The cash flow generated by Bezeq’s operations is used partially for investment in equipment. The prices of the equipment are affected by the indices to which they are linked, including industry price indices, exchange rates and global prices. Bezeq does not hedge against this exposure. Bezeq is also exposed to changes in copper prices that result in a change in the residual value of its copper cable infrastructure. In deploying its NGN, Bezeq removes copper cables previously used to provide its services and sells the coopercopper extracted from such cables, and thecables. The prices received are subject to the volatility of the copper market.

 

ITEM 12.DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES

 

Not applicable.

 

137

PARTPART II

 

ITEM 13.DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES

 

None.

 

ITEM 14.MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDSPROCEEDS

 

Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders

 

None.

 

Use of Proceeds

 

Not applicable.

 

157

ITEM15.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

 

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our chief executive officer and principal financial officer to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our management, including our chief executive officer and principal financial officer, conducted an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined under Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e), as of the end of the period covered by this annual report on Form 20-F. Based upon that evaluation, our chief executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

 

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

 

Our management, including our chief executive officer and principal financial officer, is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined under Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets, (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with appropriate authorizations; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

 

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015.2016. In conducting its assessment of internal control over financial reporting, management based its evaluation on the framework in “Internal Control – Integrated Framework” (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations, or the COSO, of the Treadway Commission. Based on that assessment, our management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2015.2016.

138

 

Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

Our independent registered accounting firm, Somekh Chaikin, a member firm of KPMG International, has issued an audit report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. The report is included our audited consolidated financial statements set forth in “Item 18 - Financial Statements.”

 

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

The acquisition of all the outstanding shares of DBS represents a material change in internal controls over financial reporting since the previous assessment of the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting made by our management. In light of the complexity and scope of DBS activities, the use of separate accounting systems and internal control procedures by DBS, as well as in order to ensure our ability to evaluate the internal controls over the financial reporting of DBS in the best possible manner, our management decided to adopt the concession granted in accordance with the directives of the SEC, so that the first-time implementation of the assessment of the effectiveness of internal controls and procedures of DBS will begin on December 31, 2016. With the exception of the DBS acquisition, thereThere were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the period covered by the Report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

ITEMITEM 16.[RESERVED]

 

ITEMITEM 16A.AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT

 

Our board of directors has determined that Messrs. Benny Gabbay and Moshe Rosenthal, independent directors, meet the definition of an audit committee financial expert, as defined by rules of the SEC. For a listing of Messrs. Gabbay and Rosenthal’s relevant experience, see Item 6A. “Directors, Senior Management and Employees - Directors and Senior Management.

 

ITEM 16B.CODE OF ETHICS

 

We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to our chief executive officer and all senior financial officers of our company, including the principal financial officer, chief accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. Our code of ethics is available for viewing on our website atwww.bcommunications.co.il. Written copies are available upon request. If we make any substantive amendment to the code of ethics or grant any waivers, including any implicit waiver, from a provision of the codes of ethics, we will disclose the nature of such amendment or waiver on our website.

 

158

ITEM 16C.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

 

Fees Billed by Independent Public Accountants

 

The following table sets forth, for each of the years indicated, the aggregate fees billed to us, Bezeq, Pelephone and Bezeq International by Somekh Chaikin, a member firm of KPMG International, the independent registered public accounting firm that prepares our and their financial statements. All of such fees were pre-approved by the relevant committee for the examination of the financial statements.

 

  Year Ended December 31, 
Services Rendered 2014  2015 
             
Audit fees and audit-related fees(1)(2)  NIS   5,315,000   NIS   6,332,000 
Tax fees and all other fees(3)  NIS   1,646,000   NIS   1,155,000 
Total  NIS   6,961,000   NIS   7,487,000 

   Year Ended December 31, 
Services Rendered  2015   2016 
   Unconsolidated   Consolidated   Unconsolidated   Consolidated 
Audit fees and audit-related fees (1)(2)  NIS 680,000   NIS 6,332,000   NIS 680,000   NIS 6,210,000 
Tax fees and all other fees (3)  NIS 216,000   NIS 1,155,000   NIS 223,000   NIS 1,459,000 
Total  NIS 896,000   NIS 7,487,000   NIS 903,000   NIS 7,669,000 

 

 

(1)Audit fees are for audit services for each of the years shown in the table, including fees associated with the annual audit and audit services provided in connection with other statutory and regulatory filings.

(2)Audit related fees are the aggregate fees billed for assurance and related services that are not reported under audit fees. These fees include internal controls review services as well as agreed upon procedures for certain regulatory matters.

(3)Tax fees are the aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered for tax compliance and tax advice.

 

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

 

Our audit committee has adopted a policy and procedures for the pre-approval of audit and non-audit services rendered by our independent registered public accounting firm, Somekh Chaikin, a member firm of KPMG International. Somekh Chaikin also acts as Bezeq’s independent registered public accounting firm. Pre-approval of an audit or non-audit service may be given as a general pre-approval, as part of the audit committee’s approval of the scope of the engagement of our independent auditor, or on an individual basis. Any proposed services exceeding general pre-approved levels also require specific pre-approval by our audit committee. The policy prohibits retention of the independent registered public accountants to perform the prohibited non-audit functions defined in Section 201 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act or the rules of the SEC, and also requires the audit committee to consider whether proposed services are compatible with the independence of the registered public accounting firm.

 

139

ITEM 16D.EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES

 

Not applicable.

 

ITEM 16E.PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS

 

No ordinary shares of our company were purchased by us or on our behalf or by any affiliated purchaser during 2015.2016.

 

ITEM 16F.CHANGES IN REGISTRANT’S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT

 

None.

 

ITEM 16G.CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

NASDAQ Exemptions for a Controlled Company

 

We are a controlled company within the meaning of NASDAQ Stock Market Rule 5615(c)(1), since Internet Gold holds more than 50% of our voting power. Under NASDAQ Stock Market Rule 5615(c)(2), a controlled company is exempt from the following requirements of NASDAQ Stock Market Rule 5605:

 

The requirement that the majority of the company’s board of directors qualify as independent directors, as defined under the NASDAQ Stock Market Rules. Instead, we follow Israeli law and practice which requires that we appoint at least two external directors, within the meaning of the Israeli Companies Law, to our board of directors. In addition, we have the mandated three independent directors, within the meaning of the rules of the SEC and NASDAQ, on our audit committee. See Item 6C. “Directors, Senior Management and Employees - Board Practices.”

159

 

The requirement that the compensation of the chief executive officer and all other executive officers be determined, or recommended to the board of directors for determination, either by (i) a majority of the independent directors or (ii) a compensation committee comprised solely of independent directors. Under the Israeli Companies Law, any compensation arrangement with an office holder (including an exemption from liability and the insurance and indemnification of an office holder), require the approval of the compensation committee, the board of directors and in certain circumstances, shareholders.

 

The requirement that director nominees either be selected or recommended for the board of directors’ selection, either by (a) a majority of independent directors or (b) a nominations committee comprised solely of independent directors. Instead, we follow Israeli law and practice, in accordance with which directors may be recommended by our board of directors for election by our shareholders.

 

If the “controlled company” exemptions cease to be available to us under the NASDAQ Stock Market Rules, we may instead elect to follow Israeli law instead of the foregoing NASDAQ requirements, as described below.

 

NASDAQ Stock Market Rules and Home Country Practice

 

Under NASDAQ Stock Market Rule 5615(a)(3), foreign private issuers, such as our company, are permitted to follow certain home country corporate governance practices instead of certain provisions of the NASDAQ Stock Market Rules. As a foreign private issuer listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market, we may follow home country practice with regard to, among other things, the composition of the board of directors, compensation of officers, director nomination process and quorum at shareholders’ meetings. In addition, we may follow home country practice instead of the NASDAQ requirement to obtain shareholder approval for certain dilutive events (such as for the establishment or amendment of certain equity-based compensation plans, an issuance that will result in a change of control of the company, certain transactions other than a public offering involving issuances of a 20% or more interest in the company and certain acquisitions of the stock or assets of another company). A foreign private issuer that elects to follow a home country practice instead of NASDAQ requirements must submit to NASDAQ in advance a written statement from an independent counsel in such issuer’s home country certifying that the issuer’s practices are not prohibited by the home country’s laws. In addition, a foreign private issuer must disclose in its annual reports filed with the SEC each such requirement that it does not follow and describe the home country practice followed by the issuer instead of any such requirement. Accordingly, our shareholders may not be afforded the same protection as provided under NASDAQ’s corporate governance rules.

 

ITEM 16H.MINE SAFETYSAFETY DISCLOSURE

 

Not applicable.

 

140

PARTPART III

 

ITEM 17.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

We have elected to furnish financial statements and related information specified in Item 18.

 

ITEM 18.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Consolidated Financial Statements of B Communications Ltd. Page
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements F-1
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm F-2-F-3F-2
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position F-4F-3
Consolidated Statements of Income F-6F-5
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income F-7F-6
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity F-8F-7
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows F-11F-10
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements F-13F-12

 

160

ITEM 19.EXHIBITS

 

Index to Exhibits

 

Exhibit Description
   
1.1 Memorandum of Association of the Registrant(1)
   
1.2 Amended and Restated Articles of Association of the Registrant(2)
   
2.1 Specimen of Ordinary Share Certificate(1)
   
4.1 Trust Deed between the Registrant and Shiff Hezenfortz Trustees (2004) Ltd. dated March 8, 2007(1)
4.2Form of Smile.Communications Series A Debenture Certificate for Notes issued in March and May 2007(1)

4.3

Form of Registration Rights Agreement among the Registrant, Internet Gold-Golden Lines Ltd. and Eurocom Communications Ltd.(1)

   
4.44.2 English Translation of the Terms of the Bezeq – DBS Merger Agreement(3)
   
4.5Form of Indenture between the Registrant and Mishmeret Trust dated February 19, 2014(4)
4.6Form of Intercreditor Agreement between the Registrant and Mishmeret Trust dated February 19, 2014(5)
4.74.3 English translation of Bezeq Control Permit issued by the Prime Minister of Israel and Israeli Minister of Communications to members of the Eurocom Group on April 13, 2010(6)(4)
   
4.8English translation of Credit Agreement dated February 11, 2010 between B Communications (SP2) Ltd. and Bank Hapoalim Ltd. (as Lender, Facility Agent and Security Trustee), Bank Leumi le-Israel BM, Amitim (Senior Pension Funds), Israel Discount Bank Ltd., Mizrahi Tefahot Bank Ltd., HSBC Bank PLC, First International Bank of Israel Ltd. and Union Bank of Israel (as Lenders)(7)

4.9English translation of Loan Agreement dated February 18, 2010, between B Communications (SP1) Ltd. and entities within the Migdal Insurance and Financial Holdings Ltd. group(8)
4.10English translation of Addendum and Amendment No. 1 to the Credit Agreement dated February 11, 2010, dated April 14, 2010, between B Communications (SP2) Ltd. and Bank Hapoalim Ltd. (as Lender, Facility Agent and Security Trustee), Bank Leumi le-Israel BM, Israel Discount Bank Ltd., Mizrahi Tefahot Bank Ltd., HSBC Bank PLC, First International Bank of Israel Ltd., Union Bank of Israel, Central Benefits Fund of Histadrut Employees Ltd. (under special management), Makefet Fund Pension and Provident Center - AS Ltd. Pension Fund, Makefet Fund Pension and Provident Center - AS Ltd. (under special management) – Other-Purpose Funds, Mivtachim The Workers Social Insurance Fund Ltd. (under special management) - Pension Fund, Mivtachim The Workers Social Insurance Fund Ltd. (under special management) Illness and Accident Provident Fund, Hadassa Employees Pension Fund Ltd. (under special management), “Egged” Members Pension Fund Ltd. (under special management) – Pension Track and “Egged” Members Pension Fund Ltd. (under special management) – Full Pension Track (as Lenders)(9)
4.11English translation of Addendum and Amendment No. 2 the Credit Agreement dated February 11, 2010, dated June 26, 2011, between B Communications (SP2) Ltd. and Bank Hapoalim Ltd. (as Lender, Facility Agent and Security Trustee) and the Lenders(10)
4.12English translation of Addendum and Amendment No. 1 the Loan Agreement dated February 18, 2010, dated April 14, 2010, between B Communications (SP1) Ltd. and entities within the Migdal Insurance and Financial Holdings Ltd. group(11)
4.134.4 2007 Equity Incentive Plan.(1)
   
4.144.5 Officers’ Compensation Policy, April 2016(12)(5)
   
4.154.6 English translation of Deed of Trust dated August 31, 2010 between the Registrant and Reznik, Paz, Nevo Trustees Ltd.(13)(6)

 161 

ExhibitDescription
4.164.7 English translation of Addendum to the Deed of Trust of August 31, 2010 dated September 20, 2010 between the Registrant and Reznik, Paz, Nevo Trustees Ltd.(14)(7)
   
8.14.8 ListEnglish translation of SubsidiariesDeed of Trust dated September 14, 2016 between the Registrant and Reznik, Paz, Nevo Trustees Ltd.
   
12.18.1 List of Subsidiaries of the Registrant
12.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
   
12.2 Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act 1934, as amended
   
13.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002
   
13.2 Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002

 

 

(1) 

Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form F-1, Registration Number 333-146645, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and incorporated herein by reference.

(2) Filed as Exhibit 1.2 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference.

(3)

(4)

 

Filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the Registrant’s Report on Form 6-K for the month of March 2015, and incorporated herein by reference.

Filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Registrant’s Report on Form 6-K for the month of February 2014, and incorporated herein by reference.

(5) Filed as Exhibit 99.3 to the Registrant’s Report on Form 6-K for the month of February 2014, and incorporated herein by reference.
(6)(4) Filed as Exhibit 4.7 to the Registrant’s Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.
(7)
(5) Filed as Exhibit 4.8 to the Registrant’s Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.
(8)Filed as Exhibit 4.9 to the Registrant’s Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.
(9)Filed as Exhibit 4.10 to the Registrant’s Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.
(10)Filed as Exhibit 4.11 to the Registrant’s Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference.
(11)Filed as Exhibit 4.11 to the Registrant’s Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.
(12)Filed as Exhibit 99.299.1 to the Registrant’s Report on Form 6-K for the month of September 2013,May 2016, and incorporated herein by reference.
(13)
(6) Filed as Exhibit 4.14 to the Registrant’s Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference.
(14)
(7) Filed as Exhibit 4.15 to the Registrant’s Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference.

 162141 

 

    

B Communications Ltd.

 

Consolidated Financial Statements

 

 

Contents

 

 Page
  
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmF-2
  
Consolidated Statements of Financial PositionF-4F-3
  
Consolidated Statements of IncomeF-6F-5
  
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive IncomeF-7F-6
  
Consolidated Statements of Changes in EquityF-8F-7
  
Consolidated Statements of Cash FlowsF-11F-10
  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial StatementsF-13F-12

 

 F-1 

 

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of

B Communications Ltd.

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial position of B Communications Ltd. and its subsidiaries (hereinafter - “the Company”) as of December 31, 20142015 and 20152016 and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2015.2016. We also have auditedB Communications Ltd.’sinternal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015,2016, based on criteria established inInternal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (hereinafter - “COSO”). B Communications Ltd.’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying management’s report under Item 15 - Control and Procedures. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and an opinion on B Communications Ltd.’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

 

A company'scompany’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company'scompany’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company'scompany’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

F-2

 

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20142015 and 2015,2016, and the results of itstheir operations and itstheir cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 20152016 in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. Also in our opinion, B CommunicationsCommunication Ltd. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015,2016, based on criteria established inInternal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO.

The Company acquired DBS Satellite Services (1998) Ltd. ("DBS") during 2015. The Company's management excluded from its assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015 DBS’s internal control over financial reporting. DBS's revenues represent 13.4% of the revenues in the consolidated financial statements of 2015. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of the Company excluded an audit of the internal control over financial reporting of DBS.

 

The accompanying consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 20152016 have been translated into United States dollars (“dollars”) solely for the convenience of the reader. We have audited the translation and, in our opinion, the consolidated financial statements expressed in New Israeli Shekels have been translated into dollars on the basis set forth in Note 2D to the consolidated financial statements.

 

/s/ Somekh Chaikin

Somekh Chaikin

 

Certified Public Accountants (Isr.)

Member Firm of KPMG International

 

Tel Aviv, Israel

 

April 18, 201626, 2017

F-2

B Communications Ltd.

Consolidated Statements of Financial Position as of

(In millions)

          Convenience 
          translation into 
          U.S. dollars 
    December 31  (Note 2D) 
    2015  2016  2016 
  Note NIS  NIS  US$ 
            
Current assets           
Cash and cash equivalents 5  581   762   198 
Restricted cash 13B(1)  155   -   - 
Investments 6  1,535   907   236 
Trade receivables, net 7  2,058   2,000   520 
Other receivables 7  *270  216   56 
Inventory    115   106   28 
               
Total current assets    4,714   3,991   1,038 
               
Non-current assets              
Long-term trade and other receivables 7  674   644   167 
Property, plant and equipment 8  *7,213  7,072   1,840 
Intangible assets 9  7,118   6,534   1,699 
Deferred expenses and investments 10  643   447   116 
Broadcast rights 11  456   432   112 
Investment in equity-accounted investee 12  25   18   5 
Deferred tax assets 19  1,279   1,007   262 
               
Total non-current assets    17,408   16,154   4,201 
               
Total assets    22,122   20,145   5,239 

* Reclassified

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

 F-3 

 

 

B Communications Ltd.

 

Consolidated Statements of Financial Position as of

(In millions)

           Convenience 
           translation into 
           U.S. dollars 
     December 31  (Note 2D) 
     2014  2015  2015 
  Note  NIS  NIS  US$ 
Assets            
Cash and cash equivalents  5   713   581   149 
Restricted cash  13B(1)  65   155   40 
Investments including derivatives  6   3,102   1,535   393 
Trade receivables, net  7   2,227   2,058   527 
Other receivables  7   243   270   69 
Inventory      96   115   30 
Assets classified as held-for-sale      52   16   4 
                 
Total current assets      6,498   4,730   1,212 
                 
Long-term trade and other receivables  7   566   674   173 
Property, plant and equipment  8   6,572   7,197   1,844 
Intangible assets  9   5,908   7,118   1,824 
Deferred expenses and investments  10   635   643   165 
Broadcast rights  11   -   456   117 
Investment in equity-accounted investee  12   1,057   25   6 
Deferred tax assets  19   -   1,279   328 
                 
Total non-current assets      14,738   17,392   4,457 
                 
Total assets      21,236   22,122   5,669 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-4

B Communications Ltd.

Consolidated Statements of Financial Position as of (cont’d)

(In millions)

 

(In millions)

        Convenience       Convenience 
        translation into       translation into 
        U.S. dollars       U.S. dollars 
    December 31  (Note 2D)    December 31  (Note 2D) 
    2014  2015  2015    2015  2016  2016 
 Note  NIS  NIS  US$  Note NIS  NIS  US$ 
Liabilities         
         
Current liabilities         
Bank loans and credit and debentures  13   1,501   2,089   535  13  2,089   2,051   533 
Trade and other payables  14   1,405   1,694   434  14  1,694   1,640   427 
Related party  12B  -   233   60  12B  233   32   8 
Current tax liabilities  19   671   705   180  19  705   138   36 
Provisions  15   62   100   26  15  100   80   21 
Employee benefits  18   259   378   97  18  378   315   82 
Total current liabilities      3,898   5,199   1,332     5,199   4,256   1,107 
                              
Bank and institutional loans and debentures  13   12,357   12,290   3,150 
Non-current liabilities              
Bank loans and debentures 13  12,290   11,446   2,978 
Employee benefits  18   233   240   61  18  240   258   67 
Other liabilities and derivatives      256   227   58 
Other liabilities    227   244   63 
Provisions  15   69   46   12  15  46   47   12 
Deferred tax liabilities  19   835   729   187  19  729   593   154 
Total non-current liabilities      13,750   13,532   3,468     13,532   12,588   3,274 
                              
Total liabilities      17,648   18,731   4,800     18,731   16,844   4,381 
                              
Equity  23              23            
Total equity attributable to equity holders                
of the Company      961   1,045   268 
Attributable to shareholders of the company    1,045   1,170   304 
Non-controlling interests      2,627   2,346   601     2,346   2,131   554 
                              
Total equity      3,588   3,391   869     3,391   3,301   858 
                              
Total liabilities and equity      21,236   22,122   5,669     22,122   20,145   5,239 

  

Date of approval of the financial statements: April 18, 201626, 2017

 

/s/ Doron Turgeman /s/ Itzik Tadmor
CEO Principal Financial Officer

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-4

B Communications Ltd.

Consolidated Statements of Income for the Year Ended December 31

(In millions, except per share data)

             Convenience 
             translation into 
             U.S. dollars 
             (Note 2D) 
    2014  2015  2016  2016 
  Note NIS  NIS  NIS  US$ 
               
Revenues 24  9,055   9,985   10,084   2,623 
                   
Costs and expenses                  
Depreciation and amortization    1,873   2,131   2,161   563 
Salaries 25  1,770   1,958   2,015   524 
General and operating expenses 26  3,368   3,876   4,021   1,046 
Other operating expenses (income), net 27  (535)  3   21   5 
                   
     6,476   7,968   8,218   2,138 
                   
Operating profit    2,579   2,017   1,866   485 
                   
Financing expenses (income)                  
Finance expenses    1,236   689   1,054   274 
Finance income    (625)  (154)  (123)  (32)
                   
Financing expenses, net 28  611   535   931   242 
                   
Profit after financing expenses, net    1,968   1,482   935   243 
                   
Share of loss (income) in equity-accounted investee 12  170   (12)  5   1 
                   
Profit before income tax    1,798   1,494   930   242 
                   
Income tax expenses 19  667   358   442   115 
                   
Net profit for the year    1,131   1,136   488   127 
                   
Profit (loss) attributable to:                  
Shareholders of the company    (21)  210   (236)  (61)
Non-controlling interests    1,152   926   724   188 
                   
Net profit for the year    1,131   1,136   488   127 
                   
Earnings (loss) per share 30                
Basic    (0.70)  7.04   (7.92)  (2.06)
Diluted    (0.81)  6.97   (7.92)  (2.06)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

 F-5 

 

 

B Communications Ltd.

 

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Year Ended December 31

 

(In millions, except per share data)millions)

 

              Convenience 
              translation into 
              U.S. dollars 
              (Note 2D) 
     2013  2014  2015  2015 
  Note  NIS  NIS  NIS  US$ 
                
Revenues  24   9,563   9,055   9,985   2,559 
                     
Cost and expenses                    
Depreciation and amortization      2,014   1,873   2,131   546 
Salaries  25   1,873   1,770   1,958   502 
General and operating expenses  26   3,584   3,368   3,876   993 
Other operating expenses (income), net  27   57   (535)  3   1 
                     
       7,528   6,476   7,968   2,042 
                     
Operating income      2,035   2,579   2,017   517 
                     
Financing expenses (income)                    
Finance expenses      843   1,236   689   177 
Finance income      (523)  (625)  (154)  (40)
                     
Financing expenses, net  28   320   611   535   137 
                     
Income after financing expenses, net      1,715   1,968   1,482   380 
                     
Share of loss (income) in equity-accounted investee  12   252   170   (12)  (3)
                     
Income before income tax      1,463   1,798   1,494   383 
                     
Income tax  19   524   667   358   92 
                     
Net income for the year      939   1,131   1,136   291 
                     
Income (loss) attributable to:                    
Owners of the company      137   (21)  210   54 
Non-controlling interests      802   1,152   926   237 
                     
Net income for the year      939   1,131   1,136   291 
                     
Earnings per share  30                 
Basic income (loss) per share      4.56   (0.70)  7.04   1.80 
Diluted income (loss) per share      4.50   (0.81)  6.97   1.79 
           Convenience 
           translation into 
           U.S. dollars 
           (Note 2D) 
   2014  2015  2016  2016 
   NIS  NIS  NIS  US$ 
             
Net profit for the year  1,131   1,136   488   127 
                 
Items of comprehensive profit (loss), net of tax  (36)  7   (15)  (4)
                 
Total comprehensive profit for the year  1,095   1,143   473   123 
                 
Attributable to:                
Shareholders of the Company  (32)  212   (240)  (62)
Non-controlling interests  1,127   931   713   185 
                 
Total comprehensive profit for the year  1,095   1,143   473   123 

  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 F-6 

 

 

B Communications Ltd.

 

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for The Year Ended December 31

(In millions)

           Convenience 
           translation into 
           U.S. dollars 
           (Note 2D) 
  2013  2014  2015  2015 
  NIS  NIS  NIS  US$ 
             
Net income for the year  939   1,131   1,136   291 
                 
Items of comprehensive income (loss),                
 net of tax  6   (36)  7   2 
                 
Total comprehensive income for the year  945   1,095   1,143   293 
                 
Attributable to:                
Owners of the Company  139   (32)  212   54 
Non-controlling interests  806   1,127   931   239 
                 
Total comprehensive income for the year  945   1,095   1,143   293 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-7

B Communications Ltd.

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity (cont'd)

 

(In millions except share data)

 

  Attributable to owners of the Company    
  Share capital              
  

Number ofShares(1)

 Amount Share premium Treasury Shares 

Otherreserves (2)

 Retained earnings Total Non-Controlling interests Total equity
  NIS 0.1 par                
  value NIS NIS NIS NIS NIS NIS NIS NIS
Balance as at January 1, 2013  29,889,045   3   1,057   (*)   (101)  1   960   3,376   4,336 
                                     
Changes during 2013:                                    
Share-based compensation in subsidiary                       29   29 
Acquisition of non-controlling interests              (4)     (4)  (9)  (13)
Exercise of options in a subsidiary              2      2   3   5 
Dividends to non-controlling interests                       (1,288)  (1,288)
Dividend to shareholders                 (102)  (102)     (102)
                                     
Other comprehensive income, net of tax              (5)  7   2   4   6 
Net income for the year                 137   137   802   939 
Comprehensive income for the year              (5)  144   139   806   945 
                                     
Balance as at December 31, 2013  29,889,045   3   1,057   

(*)

   (108)  43   995   2,917   3,912 
  Attributable to shareholders of the Company       
  Share capital           Retained earnings     Non-    
  Number of     Share  Treasury  Other  (Accumulated     Controlling  Total 
  Shares(1)  Amount  premium  Shares  reserves  deficit)  Total  interests  equity 
  NIS 0.1 par                         
  value  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS 
                            
Balance as at January 1, 2014  29,889,045   3   1,057   (*)   (34)  (31)  995   2,917   3,912 
                                     
Changes during 2014:                                    
Share-based compensation in subsidiary  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   (1)  (1)
Exercise of options in a subsidiary  -   -   -   -   (2)  -   (2)  15   13 
Dividends to non-controlling interests  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   (1,431)  (1,431)
                                     
Other comprehensive profit (loss),  net of tax  -   -   -   -   (12)  1   (11)  (25)  (36)
Net profit (loss) for the year  -   -   -   -   -   (21)  (21)  1,152   1,131 
Comprehensive profit (loss) for the year  -   -   -   -   (12)  (20)  (32)  1,127   1,095 
                                     
Balance as at December 31, 2014  29,889,045   3   1,057   (*)   (48)  (51)  961   2,627   3,588 

 

(1)Net of treasury shares.
(2)Including reserve from transactions with non-controlling interests.

*Represents an amount less than NIS 1.

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-7

B Communications Ltd.

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity (cont’d)

(In millions except share data)

  Attributable to shareholders of the Company       
  Share capital                 Non-    
  Number of     Share  Treasury  Other  Retained     Controlling  Total 
  Shares(1)  Amount  premium  Shares  reserves  earnings  Total  interests  equity 
  NIS 0.1 par                         
  value  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS 
                            
Balance as at January 1, 2015  29,889,045   3   1,057   (*)  (48)  (51)  961   2,627   3,588 
                                     
Changes during 2015:                                    
Exercise of options in a subsidiary  -   -   -   -   (1)  -   (1)  20   19 
Dividends to non-controlling interests  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   (1,232)  (1,232)
Dividend to shareholders  -   -   -   -   -   (127)  (127)  -   (127)
                                     
Other comprehensive profit, net of tax  -   -   -   -   2   -   2   5   7 
Net profit for the year  -   -   -   -   -   210   210   926   1,136 
Comprehensive profit for the year  -   -   -   -   2   210   212   931   1,143 
                                     
Balance as at December 31, 2015  29,889,045   3   1,057   (*)  (47)  32   1,045   2,346   3,391 

(1)Net of treasury shares.
*Represents an amount less than NIS 1.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

 F-8 

 

 

B Communications Ltd.

 

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity (cont'd)(cont’d)

 

(In millions except share data)

 

  Attributable to owners of the Company    
  Share capital              
  

Number ofShares(1)

 Amount Share premium Treasury Shares 

Otherreserves (2)

 Retained earnings (Accumulated deficit) Total Non-Controlling interests Total equity
  NIS 0.1 par                
  value NIS NIS NIS NIS NIS NIS NIS NIS
Balance as at January 1, 2014  29,889,045   3   1,057   (*)   (108)  43   995   2,917   3,912 
                                     
Changes during 2014:                                    
Share-based compensation in subsidiary                       (1)  (1)
Exercise of options in a subsidiary              (2)     (2)  15   13 
Dividends to non-controlling interests                       (1,431)  (1,431)
                                     
Other comprehensive income, net of tax              (12)  1   (11)  (25)  (36)
Net income (loss) for the year                 (21)  (21)  1,152   1,131 
Comprehensive income (loss) for the year              (12)  (20)  (32)  1,127   1,095 
                                     
Balance as at December 31, 2014  29,889,045   3   1,057   

(*)

   (122)  23   961   2,627   3,588 
           Convenience 
  Attributable to shareholders of the Company        translation 
  Share capital                 Non-     into U.S. 
  Number of     Share  Treasury  Other  Retained     Controlling  Total  dollars 
  Shares(1)  Amount  premium  Shares  reserves  earnings  Total  interests  equity  (Note 2D) 
  NIS 0.1 par                            
  value  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  US$ 
                               
Balance as at January 1, 2016  29,889,045   3   1,057   (*)  (47)  32   1,045   2,346   3,391   882 
                                         
Changes during 2016:                                        
Exercise of options in a subsidiary  -   -   -   -   (2)  -   (2)  6   4   1 
Transactions with non-controlling                                        
 interest, net of tax  -   -   -   -   -   722   722   128   850   221 
Dividends to non-controlling interests  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   (1,062)  (1,062)  (277)
Dividend to shareholders  -   -   -   -   -   (355)  (355)  -   (355)  (92)
                                         
Other comprehensive profit (loss), net of tax  -   -   -   -   3   (7)  (4)  (11)  (15)  (4)
Net profit (loss) for the year  -   -   -   -   -   (236)  (236)  724   488   127 
Comprehensive profit (loss) for the year  -   -   -   -   3   (243)  (240)  713   473   123 
                                         
Balance as at December 31, 2016  29,889,045   3   1,057   (*)  (46)  156   1,170   2,131   3,301   858 

 

(1)Net of treasury shares.
(2)Including reserve from transactions with non-controlling interests.

*Represents an amount less than NIS 1.

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

 F-9 

 

 

B Communications Ltd.

 

Consolidated Statements of Changes in EquityCash Flows for the Year Ended December 31

 

(In millions except share data)millions)

 

         
  Attributable to owners of the Company      
  Share capital                
  

Number of Shares(1)

 Amount Share premium Treasury Shares 

Otherreserves (2)

 Retained earnings Total Non-Controlling interests Total equity Convenience translation into U.S. dollars (Note 2D)
  NIS 0.1 par                  
  value NIS NIS NIS NIS NIS NIS NIS NIS US$
Balance as at January 1, 2015  29,889,045   3   1,057   (*)   (122)  23   961   2,627   3,588   920 
                                         
Changes during 2015:                                        
Exercise of options in a subsidiary              (1)     (1)  20   19   5 
Dividends to non-controlling interests                       (1,232)  (1,232)  (316)
Dividend to shareholders                 (127)  (127)     (127)  (33)
                                         
Other comprehensive income, net of tax              2      2   5   7   2 
Net income for the year                 210   210   926   1,136   291 
Comprehensive income for the year              2   210   212   931   1,143   293 
                                         
Balance as at December 31, 2015  29,889,045   3   1,057   

(*)

   (121)  106   1,045   2,346   3,391   869 

(1)Net of treasury shares.
(2)Including reserve from transactions with non-controlling interests.

*Represents an amount less than NIS 1.
           Convenience 
           translation into 
           U.S. dollars 
           (Note 2D) 
  2014  2015  2016  2016 
  NIS  NIS  NIS  US$ 
Cash flows from operating activities            
Net profit for the year  1,131   1,136   488   127 
                 
Adjustments:                
Depreciation and amortization  1,873   2,131   2,161   563 
Profit from the sale of Coral Tell Ltd. shares  (582)  -   -   - 
Loss (profit) from consolidating an investee  -   (12)  5   1 
Share of losses (profit) of equity accounted investees  170   (12)  -   - 
Finance expenses, net  710   570   981   255 
Capital gain, net  (125)  (136)  (86)  (22)
Income tax expenses  667   358   442   115 
Others  (8)  (13)  -   - 
                 
Change in inventory  28   (20)  (20)  (5)
Change in trade and other receivables  549   323   110   28 
Change in trade and other payables  (41)  (271)  (24)  (6)
Changes in provisions  (63)  18   (19)  (5)
Changes in employee benefits  3   110   (65)  (17)
Change in other liabilities  4   4   23   6 
Net income tax paid  (527)  (534)  (534)  (140)
Net cash provided by operating activities  3,789   3,652   3,462   900 
                 
Cash flows from investing activities                
Purchase of property, plant and equipment  (1,081)  (1,324)  (1,193)  (310)
Investment in intangible assets and deferred expenses  (194)  (311)  (223)  (58)
Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment  230   151   138   36 
Tax payments due to owners loans  -   -   (461)  (120)
Change in investments, net  (1,385)  1,574   621   162 
Net deposits from (to) restricted cash  (65)  (90)  155   40 
Net proceeds from the sale Coral Tell shares  596   -   -   - 
Cash from gaining control over investee  -   299   -   - 
Other  3   11   15   4 
                 
Net cash provided by (used in)  investing activities  (1,896)  310   (948)  (246)

  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

 F-10 

 

 

B Communications Ltd.

 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Year Ended December 31 (cont’d)

 

(In millions)

           Convenience 
           translation into 
           U.S. dollars 
           (Note 2D) 
  2013  2014  2015  2015 
  NIS  NIS  NIS  US$ 
             
Cash flows from operating activities            
Net income for the year  939   1,131   1,136   291 
                 
Adjustments:                
Depreciation and amortization  2,014   1,873   2,131   546 
Profit from the sale of Coral Tell Ltd. shares  -   (582)  -   - 
Profit from consolidating an investee  -   -   (12)  (3)
Share of losses (profit) of equity accounted investees  252   170   (12)  (3)
Finance expenses, net  448   710   570   146 
Capital gain, net  (94)  (125)  (136)  (35)
Income tax expenses  524   667   358   92 
Others  7   (8)  (13)  (3)
                 
Change in inventory  9   28   (20)  (5)
Change in trade and other receivables  653   549   323   83 
Change in trade and other payables  24   (41)  (271)  (69)
Changes in provisions  (19)  (63)  18   5 
Changes in employee benefits  2   3   110   28 
Change in other liabilities  11   4   4   1 
Net income tax paid  (625)  (527)  (534)  (138)
Net cash provided by operating activities  4,145   3,789   3,652   936 
                 
Cash flows from investing activities                
Purchase of property, plant and equipment  (1,042)  (1,081)  (1,324)  (339)
Investment in intangible assets and deferred expenses  (186)  (194)  (311)  (80)
Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment  312   230   151   39 
Change in investments, net  (157)  (1,385)  1,574   403 
Proceeds from (acquisition of) non-current Investments  9   (19)  -   - 
Net deposits to restricted cash  -   (65)  (90)  (23)
Net proceeds from the sale Coral Tell shares  -   596   -   - 
Cash from gaining control over investee  -   -   299   77 
Other  50   22   11   3 
                 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities  (1,014)  (1,896)  310   80 

 

           Convenience 
           translation into 
           U.S. dollars 
           (Note 2D) 
  2014  2015  2016  2016 
  NIS  NIS  NIS  US$ 
Cash flows from financing activities            
Proceeds from issuance of debentures and loans received  4,206   1,010   4,184   1,088 
Repayment of debentures and loans  (3,993)  (2,297)  (4,871)  (1,267)
Interest paid  (704)  (769)  (915)  (238)
Dividends paid by Bezeq to non-  controlling interests  (1,431)  (1,232)  (1,062)  (276)
Transactions with non-controlling interests  -   -   978   254 
Dividend to shareholders  -   (127)  (355)  (92)
Payments to Eurocom DBS  -   (680)  (256)  (67)
Others  3   1   (36)  (9)
                 
Net cash used in financing Activities  (1,919)  (4,094)  (2,333)  (607)
                 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  (26)  (132)  181   47 
                 
Cash and cash equivalents as at the beginning of the year  739   713   581   151 
                 
Cash and cash equivalents as at the end of the year  713   581   762   198 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

 F-11 

 

 

B Communications Ltd.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Year Ended December 31 (cont’d)

(In millions)

           Convenience 
           translation into 
           U.S. dollars 
           (Note 2D) 
  2013  2014  2015  2015 
  NIS  NIS  NIS  US$ 
             
Cash flows from financing activities            
Proceeds from issuance of debentures and loans received  1,544   4,206   1,010   259 
Repayment of debentures and loans  (1,925)  (3,993)  (2,297)  (589)
Interest paid  (660)  (704)  (769)  (197)
Dividends paid by Bezeq to non-controlling interests  (1,954)  (1,431)  (1,232)  (316)
Increase of holdings in a subsidiary  (50)  -   -   - 
Dividend to shareholders  (102)  -   (127)  (33)
Payments to Eurocom DBS  -   -   (680)  (174)
Others  (2)  3   1   

*

 
                 
Net cash used in financing Activities  (3,149)  (1,919)  (4,094)  (1,050)
                 
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents  (18)  (26)  (132)  (34)
Cash and cash equivalents as at the beginning of the year  757   739   713   183 
                 
Cash and cash equivalents as at the end of the year  739   713   581   149 

*Represents an amount less than US$ 1.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-12

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

 

Note 1 - Reporting Entity

 

B Communications Ltd. (“the Company”) is an Israeli resident company incorporated in Israel. The address of the Company’s registered office is 2 Dov Friedman Street, Ramat-Gan, Israel. The consolidated financial statements of the Company as at and for the year ended December 31, 20152016 include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. The Company is a majority-owned subsidiary of Internet Gold - Golden Lines Ltd. (“IGLD” or “Internet Gold”) and its ultimate parent is Eurocom Holdings (1979) Ltd. (“Eurocom”).

 

On April 14, 2010, the Company completed the acquisition of 30.44% of the outstanding shares of Bezeq - The Israel Telecommunications Corp. Limited (“Bezeq”) and became the controlling shareholder of Bezeq. Bezeq’s ordinary shares are registered for trade on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange.

 

On February 1, 2016, after the balance sheet date, the Company sold 115,500,000 shares of Bezeq (4.18% of the outstanding shares of Bezeq) for NIS 8.5 per share or NIS 982 (4.18%978, net of the outstanding shares of Bezeq).transaction costs. The Company retained a 26.34% ownership interest in Bezeq, following the closing of the transaction. For de factomore information relating to the Company’s control over Bezeq, see note 12F.

 

The ordinary shares of the Company are registered for trade on the NASDAQ Global Select Market and on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange.

 

Note 2 - Basis of Preparation

 

A. Statement of compliance

A.Statement of compliance

 

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards, as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.

 

The consolidated financial statements were authorized to be issued by the Company’s Board of Directors on April 18, 2016.26, 2017.

 

B. Definitions

B.Definitions

 

In these financial statements-

 

(1)The Company: B Communications Ltd.

(2)The Group: B Communications Ltd. and its subsidiaries, as listed in Note 12.B.

(3)Parent company: Internet Gold - Golden Lines Ltd.

(4)Bezeq: Bezeq - The Israel Telecommunication Corp. Limited.

(5)Bezeq Group: Bezeq The Israel Telecommunication Corp. Limited and its subsidiaries, as listed in Note 12 Investees.

(6)DBS: DBS Satellite Services (1998) Ltd.

(7)Subsidiaries: Companies whose financial statements are fully consolidated, directly or indirectly, with the financial statements of the Company.

(8)Associates: Companies, in which the Group’s investment is included, directly or indirectly, in the consolidated financial statements on an equity basis.

(9)Investees: Subsidiaries or associates.

 (10)Related party: As defined in IAS 24 (2009), Related Party Disclosures.

 F-13 

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 2 - Basis of Preparation (cont’d)

 B.Definitions (cont’d)

(11)Israeli CPI: The consumer price index as published by the Israeli Central Bureau of Statistics.

 

C.F-12

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 2 - Basis of Preparation (cont’d)

C.Functional currency and presentation currency

 

The consolidated financial statements are presented in NIS, which is the Group’s functional currency, and have been rounded to the nearest million. The NIS is the currency that represents the principal economic environment in which the Group operates.

 

D.Convenience translation into U.S. dollars (“dollars” or “$”)

 

For the convenience of the reader, the reported NIS figures as at December 31, 2015,2016, have been presented in dollars, translated at the representative rate of exchange as at December 31, 20152016 (NIS 3.9023.845 = US$ 1.00). The dollar amounts presented in these financial statements are merely supplementary information and should not be construed as complying with IFRS translation method or as representing amounts that are receivable or payable in dollars or convertible into dollars, unless otherwise indicated.

 

E.Basis of measurement

 

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the historical cost basis except for the following items:

 

*Financial instruments, including financial derivative instruments, measured at fair value recognized through profit or loss.
*Inventories measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value.
*Financial assets classified as available-for-sale measured at fair value.
*Equity-accounted investments.
*Deferred tax assets and liabilities.
*Provisions.
*LiabilitiesAssets and liabilities for employee benefits.
*Liabilities for payment of contingent consideration in a business combination.

 

For further information regarding the measurement of these assets and liabilities see Note 3 regarding significant accounting policies. The methods used to measure fair value are specified in Note 17E.

 

F.Use of estimates and judgments

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires managementthe Group’s managements to make judgments and use estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

 

The preparation of accounting estimates used in the preparation of the Group’s financial statements requires management to make assumptions regarding circumstances and events that involve considerable uncertainty. Management of the Company prepares the estimates on the basis of past experience. In exercising its judgment when making the estimates, management relies on past experience, various facts, external circumstances, and reasonable assumptions according to the pertinent circumstances of each estimate.

F-14

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 2 - Basis of Preparation (cont’d)

F.Use of estimates and judgments (cont'd)

Estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis.Revisions to accounting estimates are recognized in the period in which the estimates are revised and in any future periods affectedaffected.

F-13

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 2 - Basis of Preparation (cont’d)

F.Use of estimates and judgments (cont’d)

 

Significant estimates and judgments made when applying accounting policies and changes in these estimates and assumptions that could potentially have a material effect on the financial statements are as follows:

 

 Subject Main assumptions Possible implications Reference
 Useful life of property, plantfixed assets, intangible assets, and equipment and intangible assetsbroadcasting rights UsefulAssumptions of the useful life of property, plant and equipmentgroups of fixed assets and intangible assets Change in the value of property, plant and equipmentfixed assets and intangible assets and in depreciation and amortization expenses Note 8, Note 9 and Note 911
 Fair value measurementMeasurement of the Company's investment in DBS prior togaining control in DBSrecoverable amounts of cash-generating units that include goodwill Assumption of expected cash flows from the operations of DBS, discount rate and assumptions about the identity of the relevant market participant.cash-generating units Change in profit/Recognition of impairment loss from gaining control Note 12
Attribution of excess cost arising from acquisition of control in DBSAssumption of expected cash flows from identifiable assets in the business combination, timing of recognition, and scope of the deferred tax asset for carry-forward lossesChange in the value of identifiable tangible and intangible assets in the business combination and changes in the value of goodwillNote 12
Fair value measurement of contingent consideration in a business combinationAssumption of expected cash flows and assumption of DBS's losses for tax purposes.Change in the value of a liability for contingent consideration recognized in a business combinationNote 1211
 Deferred taxes Assumption of projectedanticipated future realization of the tax assetbenefit in the future, including assumptions for the use of carry-forward losses in DBS. Recognition or reversal of deferred tax asset in profit or loss Note 19
 Uncertain tax positions The extent of the certainty that the Group’s uncertain tax positions will be accepted (uncertain tax positions) and the risk of it incurring any additional tax and interest expenses. This is based on an analysis of a number of matters including interpretations of tax laws and the Group’s past experience Recognition of additional or openreversal of income tax expenses
 Note 19
Fair value measurement of contingent considerationAssumptions of expected cash flowsChange in the value of a liability for contingent consideration for a business combinationNote 17
 Provisions and contingent liabilities Assessment of the likelihood of claims against Group companies and measuring potential liabilities attributable to claims Reversal or creation of a provision for a claim and recognition of income/expense,expenses respectively Note 15 and Note 20

F-15

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 2 - Basis of Preparation (cont’d)

F.Use of estimates and judgment (cont'd)

SubjectMain assumptionsPossible implicationsReference
Measurement of recoverable amounts of cash-generating units that include goodwillAssumption of expected cash flows from cash generating unitsRecognition of impairment lossNote 9
 Post-employment employee benefits Actuarial assumptions such as discount rate, future salary increases and turnoverchurn rate Increase or decrease in the post-employment defined benefit obligationsobligation Note 18

 

G.Determination of fair value

 

When preparing the financial statements, the Group is required to determine the fair value of certain assets and liabilities. Further information about the assumptions made in determining fair values is disclosed in Note 17E regarding fair value.

F-14

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

 

Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies

 

The accounting policies set out below have been applied consistently by Group entities for all periods presented in these consolidated financial statements.

 

In this Note, where the Group has chosen accounting alternatives permitted in accounting standards and/or in accounting policy where there is no explicit provision in accounting standards, such disclosure is presented in bold. This does not attribute greater importance compared to other accounting policies that are not presented in bold.

A.Changes in accounting policy

Non-controlling interests

On 1 January 2016 the Group changed its accounting policy with respect to transactions with non-controlling interests, while retaining control. According to the new accounting policy, the difference between the consideration paid or received for change in non-controlling interests is recognized in retained earnings. The Group believes that this presentation provides more relevant information about its distributable earnings.

This change in accounting policy was applied retrospectively and did not have any impact on earnings per share. The following table summarizes the adjustments to equity reserves upon implementation of the new accounting policy:

  December 31,2014  December 31,2015 
        As reported        As reported 
  As previously  Effect of  in these
financial
  As previously  Effect of  in these
financial
 
  reported  adjustment  statements  reported  adjustment  statements 
  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS 
                   
Other reserves  (122)  74   (48)  (121)  74   (47)
                         
Retained earnings  23   (74)  (51)  106   (74)  32 

B.Consolidation of the financial statements and investments in associates

 

(1)Business combinations

 

In view of the consolidation of DBS as from March 23, 2015, as described in Note 12, below is a description of the accounting policy for the consolidation of DBS in these financial statements:

 

A.The Group implemented the acquisition method for all business combinations. The acquisition date is the date on which the acquirer obtained control over the acquiree.
 
B.The Group recognized goodwill at acquisition based on the fair value of the consideration transferred, and the fair value at the acquisition date of any pre-existing equity right of the Group in the acquiree, less the net amount of the identifiable assets acquired and the liabilities assumed.

 F-15

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)

B.Consolidation of the financial statements and investments in associates (cont’d)

C.The consideration transferred includes the fair value of the assets transferred to the previous owners of the acquiree and the liabilities incurred by the acquirer to the previous owners of the acquiree, including the obligation to acquire the acquiree'sacquiree’s equity instruments. In addition, the consideration transferred includes the fair value of any contingent consideration. Subsequent to the acquisition date, the Group recognizes changes in fair value of contingent consideration classified as a financial liability in profit or loss underfinancing expenses.
 
D.In the step acquisitions, the difference between the fair value at the acquisition date of the Group’s pre-existing equity rights in the acquiree and the carrying amount at that date is recognized in the statement of income under other operating income or expenses.
 
E.Costs associated with the acquisition that were incurred by the Group in the business combination such as advisory, legal, valuation and other professional or consulting fees were recognized as expenses in the period the services are received.

 

F-16

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)

A.Consolidation of the financial statements and investments in associates (cont’d)

(2)Transactions eliminated on consolidation

 

Intra-group balances and income and expense arising from intra-group transactions are eliminated in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements.

 

B.C.Foreign currency transactions

 

Transactions in foreign currency are translated into the functional currency of the Group at the exchange rate on the dates of the transactions. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies on the reporting date are retranslated to the functional currency at the exchange rate at that date.

 

C.D.Financial instruments

 

(1)Non-derivative financial assets

 

Non-derivative financial assets include mainly investments in exchange traded notes, financial funds, exchange traded funds (“ETFs"ETFs”), deposit certificates, debt instruments, shares, trade and other receivables, and cash and cash equivalents.

 

The Group initially recognizes loan and receivables when they are originated. All other financial assets are initially recognized at the date that the Group becomes a party to contractual provisions of the instrument.instrument, meaning the date that the Group undertakes to buy or sell the asset.

 

Financial assets are derecognized when the contractual rights of the Group to the cash flows from the asset expire, or the Group transfers the rights to receive the contractual cash flows fromon the financial asset in a transaction in which substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of the financial asset are transferred.

 

Regular way sales of financial assets are recognized on the trade date, meaning on the date the Group undertook to sell the asset.

 

(2)Classification of financial assets and the accounting treatment in each group

 

F-16

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)

D.Financial instruments (cont’d)

The Group classifies its financial assets as follows:

 

Cash and cash equivalents

Cash comprises cash balances available for immediate use and call deposits. Cash equivalents comprise short-term highly liquid investments (with original maturities of three months or less) that are readily convertible into known amounts of cash and are exposed to insignificant risks of change in value.

 

Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss

A financial asset is classified at fair value through profit or loss if it is held for trading or is designated as such upon initial recognition. Upon initial recognition, attributable transaction costs are recognized in the statement of income as incurred.recognition. These financial assets are measured at fair value and changes therein are recognized in the statement of income.

 

F-17

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont'd)

C.Financial instruments (cont'd)

Loans and receivables

Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. Such assets are recognized initially at fair value plus attributable transaction costs. Subsequent to initial recognition, loans and receivables are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method, net of impairment losses.

 

(3)Non-derivative financial liabilities

 

Non-derivative financial liabilities include debentures issued by the Group, loans and borrowings from banks and other credit providers, and trade and other payables.

 

The Group initially recognizes debt instruments as they are incurred.

 

Financial liabilities are initially recognized at fair value plus any attributable transaction costs. Subsequent to initial recognition, these financial liabilities are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method.

 

Financial liabilities are derecognized when the obligation of the Group, as specified in the agreement, expires or when it is discharged or canceled.

 

(4)CPI-linked assets and liabilities that are not measured at fair value

 

The value of CPI-linked financial assets and liabilities, which are not measured at fair value, is revaluated in each period according to the actual increase in the CPI.

 

(5)Offsetting financial instruments

 

Financial assets and liabilities are offset and the net amount presented in the statement of financial position when, and only when, the Group currently has a legal right to offset the amounts and intends either to settle on a net basis or to realize the asset and settle the liability simultaneously.

 

(6)Change in terms of debt instruments

An exchange of debt instruments having substantially different terms, between an existing borrower and lender is accounted for as an extinguishment of the original financial liability and the recognition of a new financial liability at fair value. Furthermore, a substantial modification of the terms of the existing financial liability or part of it is accounted for as an extinguishment of the original financial liability and the recognition of a new financial liability.

The terms are substantially different if the discounted present value of the cash flows according to the new terms, including any commissions paid, less any commissions received and discounted using the original effective interest rate, is different by at least ten percent from the discounted present value of the remaining cash flows of the original financial liability.

 F-18F-17 

 

  

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

 

Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont'd)(cont’d)

 

C.D.Financial instruments (cont'd)(cont’d)

 

(7)(6)Derivative financial instruments including hedge accounting

 

a.Hedge accounting

 

The Group holds derivative financial instruments to hedge cash flows for risks to future changes in the CPI and foreign currency exchange rate risks.CPI.

 

Forward contracts are measured at fair value. Changes in the fair value of the derivative hedging instrument designated as a cash flow hedge are recognized through other comprehensive income, in a hedging reserve under equity, to the extent that the hedge is effective. To the extent that the hedge is ineffective, changes in fair value are recognized in profit or loss. The amount recognized in the hedging reserve is reclassified toremoved and included in profit or loss in the same period as the hedged itemcash flows affect profit or loss under the same line item in the statement of income as the hedged item.

 

b.Economic hedges

 

The Group holds other derivative financial instruments to economically hedge its exposure tocash flows for foreign currency and the CPI.risks. Hedge accounting is not applied tofor these instruments. The derivative instruments that economically hedge financial assets and liabilities. Derivative instruments are recognized initially at fair value and attributable transaction costs are recognized in the statement of income as incurred. Subsequent to initial recognition, derivative financial instruments are measured at fair value and thevalue; changes in fair value are recognized in the statement of incomeprofit and loss as incurred.

 

(8)(7)Share capital

 

a.Ordinary shares

 

Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of ordinary shares are recognized as a deduction from equity.

 

b.Treasury shares

 

When share capital recognized as equity is repurchased, the amount of the consideration paid, which includes directly attributable costs, net of any tax effects, is recognized as a deduction from equity. Repurchased shares are classified as treasury shares and are presented as a deduction from total equity. When treasury shares are sold or reissued subsequently, the amount received is recognized as an increase in equity, and the resulting surplus or deficit on the transaction is carried to share premium.

 

F-19

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont'd)

D.E.Broadcast rights

 

Broadcast rights are recognized at cost, net of rights exercised. The costs of rights to broadcast acquired content include the amounts paid to the rights provider, plus direct costs for preparing the rights to the broadcast. Broadcast rights are amortized in accordance with the actual broadcasts of the total number of expected broadcasts based on the management'smanagement’s estimate or broadcasts permitted under the agreement (the part that is unamortized at the end of the agreement term is amortized in full upon its termination), or on a straight line basis in accordance with the term of the rights agreement or the economic life, whichever is shorter.

The net change of broadcast rights is presented in the cash flows statements as adjustments to net income in operating activities.

F-18

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)

 

E.F.Property, plant and equipment

 

(1)Recognition and measurement

 

Items of property, plant and equipment are measured at cost less accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment losses.

 

Cost includes expenditures that are directly attributable to acquisition of the asset. The cost of self-constructed assets includes the cost of materials, direct labor and financing costs as well as any other cost directly attributable to bringing the asset to the condition for its use intended by the management, and the estimated costs of dismantling and removing the items and restoring the site on which they are located when the Group has an obligation to vacate and restore the site. The cost of purchased software that is integral to the functionality of the related equipment is recognized as part of the cost of the equipment.

 

Spare parts, servicing equipment and stand-by equipment are classified as property, plant and equipment when they meet the definition of property, plant and equipment under IAS 16, otherwise they are classified as inventory.

 

When major parts of the property, plant and equipment have different useful lives, they are accounted for as separate items (major components) of the property, plant and equipment.

 

GainsGain or losses onloss from the disposal of an item of property, plant and equipment areis determined by comparing the proceeds from disposal with the carrying amount of the asset and arewith its carrying amount.Gain or loss from the sale of fixed assets is recognized net under “other operating income”income in the statement of income.

 

(2)Subsequent expenditure

 

The cost of replacing part of an item of property, plant and equipment is recognized in the carrying amount of the item if it is probable that the future economic benefit embodied in the replaced item will flow to the Group and its cost can be measured reliably. The costs of day-to-day servicing are recognized in the statement of income as incurred.

F-20

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont'd)

E.Property, plant and equipment (cont'd)

 

(3)Depreciation

 

Depreciation is recognized in the statement of income on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of each part of an item of property, plant and equipment, since this most closely reflects the expected pattern of consumption of the future economic benefits embodied in the asset. Leased assets under finance lease agreements are depreciated over the shorter of the lease term and their useful lives. An asset is depreciated when it is ready for use, meaning when it reaches the location and condition necessary for it to be capable of operating in the manner intended by management.

 

Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the shorter of the lease term, including the extension option held by the Group and expected to be exercised and the expected life of the improvement.

  

F-19

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)

F.Property, plant and equipment (cont’d)

The estimated useful lives for the current period are as follows:

 

   Useful life  Principal depreciation rate (%) 
        
 Fixed line and international network equipment (switches, transmission, power)  4-12   12 
 Network  12-33   6 
 Subscriber equipment and installations  4-6   20 
 Equipment and infrastructure for multichannel television  3-15   14 
 Vehicles  6-7   15 
 Office and general equipment  5-14   15 
 Electronic equipment, computers and internal communication systems  3-7   24 
 Cellular network  4-15   13 
 Buildings  25   4 
 Submarine communications cable  4-25   4 
Useful life
Fixed line and international network equipment (switches, transmission, power)4-12
Network12-33
Subscriber equipment and installations4-6
Equipment and infrastructure for multichannel television3-15
Vehicles6-7
Office and general equipment5-14
Electronic equipment, computers and internalcommunication systems3-7
Cellular network4-15
Passive radio equipment at cellular network sitesup to December 31, 2030
Buildings25
Submarine communications cable4-25

 

Depreciation methods, useful lives and residual values are reviewed at least at each reporting year and adjusted as required.

 

F.G.Non-current assets held for sale

Non-current assets are classified as held for sale if it is highly probable that they will be recovered primarily through a sale transaction rather than ongoing use. These assets are presented at the lower of the carrying amount and fair value, less selling costs.

F-21

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont'd)

G.Intangible assets

 

(1)Goodwill and brand name

 

Goodwill and brand names that arise upon the acquisition of subsidiaries are included in intangible assets. Subsequent to initial recognition, brand name (Bezeq CGU, Bezeq internationalInternational CGU and Pelephone CGU) and goodwill are measured at cost less accumulated impairment losses. Goodwill and brand names are measured at least once a year to assess impairment.

 

(2)Software development costs

 

Software development costs are recognized as an intangible asset only if the development costs can be measured reliably; the software is technically and commercially feasible; and the Group has sufficient resources to complete the development and intends to use the software. The costs recognized as an intangible asset include the cost of the materials, direct labor and overhead expenses directly attributable to preparation of the asset for its intended use. Other development costs are recognized in the statement of income as incurred.

 

Capitalized development costs are measured at cost less amortization and accumulated impairment losses.

 

(3)(3)Software

 

Software that is an integral part of the hardware, which cannot function without the programs installed on it, is classified as property, plant and equipment. However, licenses for stand-alone software, which adds functionality to the hardware, is classified (mainly) as intangible assets. Software depreciation is recognized in the statement of income using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the asset.

 

F-20

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)

G.Intangible assets (cont’d)

(4)Frequency rights

 

Rights to frequencies refer to frequencies assigned to Pelephone for cellular activities, after it won the dedicated tenders of the Ministry of Communications. Depreciation of the asset is recognized in the statement of income on the straight-line basis over the allocation of frequencies term, which started from the use of the frequencies. The 4G frequencies (LTE) are being amortized over a period of 10 years. The 3.5G frequencies (UMTS / HSPA) are being amortized over a period of 13 years and seven months.

 

(5)Other intangible assets

 

Other intangible assets acquired by the Group, which have a definite useful life, are measured at cost less amortization and accumulated impairment losses.

 

(6)Subsequent expenditureexpenditures

 

Subsequent expenditure isexpenditures are recognized as an intangible assetassets only when it increasesthey increase the future economic benefits embodied in the specific asset to which it relates.they relate. All other expenditures, including expenditures relating to generated goodwill and brands, are recognized in the statement of income as incurred.

 

F-22

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont'd)

G.Intangible assets (cont’d)

 (7)Amortization

 

Amortization, except for goodwill, brand namenames (excluding brandbrands acquired in the DBS business combination) and customer relationships, is recognized in the statement of income on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the intangible assets, from the date on which the assets are available for use. Goodwill and brand namenames are not systematically amortized but are tested for impairment at least once a year.

 

Customer relationships are amortized according to the economic benefit expected from those customers each period based on their expected churn rate, which results in accelerated amortization during the early years of the relationship.

 

Estimated useful lives for the current and comparative periods are as follows:

 

 

Type of asset

 

Amortization period

 Frequency usage rights Over the term of the license for 10 to 14 years starting from the first use of the frequencies
 Computer programs and software licenses 3 - 10 years according to the term of the license or the estimated time of use of the program
 Customer relationships 5 - 12 years
 Brand acquired in a business combination 12
 Other rights 2 - 63 years according to the useful lives

 

Amortization methods and useful lives are reviewed at least once a year and adjusted if appropriate.

 

F-21

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)

H.Leased assets

 

Leases, including leases of land from the Israel Land Administration, where the Group assumes substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership are classified as finance leases. Upon initial recognition, the leased asset is measured at an amount equal to the lower of its fair value and the present value of the minimum lease payments.Subsequent to initialrecognition,initial recognition, the assets are measured at cost less accumulated amortization and impairment losses.

 

Other leases are classified as operating leases and the leased assets are not recognized in the Group’s statement of financial position. Payments made under operating leases are recognized in profit or loss on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.

At inception or upon reassessment of an arrangement, the Group determines whether such an arrangement is or contains a lease. An arrangement is a lease or contains a lease if the following two criteria are met:

 

A. The fulfillment of the arrangement is dependent on the use of a specific asset or assets;

 

B. The arrangement contains rights to use the asset

 

If, in accordance with these terms, the Group determines that the agreement does not contain a lease, the agreement is accounted for as a service agreement and payments for the service are recognized in profit or loss on a straight-line basis, over the service period.

 

F-23

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont'd)

I.Right of use of capacities

 

Transactions for acquiring an indefeasible right of use of submarine communication cable capacities are mostly accounted for as service transactions. The prepaid expense is amortized on a straight-line basis as stated in the agreement, but for no longer than the expected estimated useful life of those capacities.

 

Identifiable capacities which serve Bezeq exclusively meet the definition of a finance lease and are recognized in property, plant and equipment. The asset is depreciated on a straight-line basis as stated in the agreement, but for no longer than the expected estimated useful life of those capacities.

 

J.Inventory

 

The cost of inventories includes the cost of purchase and cost incurred in bringing the inventories to their present location and condition.

Inventories are measured at the lower of cost or net realizable value.The Group elected to recognizebase the cost of inventories according toon the moving average method.principle.

 

The inventories of a subsidiary include terminal equipment and accessories intended for sale and service, as well as spare parts used for repairs in the repair service it providesprovided to its customers.

 

Slow-moving inventory of terminal equipment, accessories and spare parts are stated net of the provision for impairment.

 

F-22

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)

K.Impairment

 

(1)Non-derivative financial assets

 

The Group tests a financial asset for impairment when objective evidence indicates that one or more loss events have had a negative effect on the estimated future cash flows of that asset.

 

Significant financial assets are tested for impairment on an individual basis. The remaining financial assets are assessed for impairment collectively, in groups that share similar credit risk characteristics. The financial statements include specific provisions and Group provisions for doubtful debts, which properly reflect, in the estimation of the management, the loss inherent in debts for which collection is in doubt.

 

(2)Non-financial assets

 

Timing of impairment testing

The carrying amounts of the Group’s non-financial assets, other than inventory and deferred tax assets are reviewed at each reporting date to determine whether there is any indication of

impairment. If any such indication exists, then the recoverable amount of the asset is estimated.

 

The Group assesses the recoverable amount of goodwill and brand name once a year, or more frequently if there are indications of impairment.

 

F-24

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont'd)

K.Impairment (cont'd)

Measurement of recoverable amount

The recoverable amount of an asset or cash-generating unit is the greater of its value in use and fair value less costs to sell. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset or cash-generating unit, for which the estimated future cash flows from the asset or cash-generating unit were not adjusted.adjusted.

 

Determining cash-generating units

For the purpose of impairment testing, the assets are grouped together into the smallest group of assets that generates cash from continuing use that are largely independent of other assets or groups of assets (“cash-generating unit”).

 

Allocation of goodwill to cash-generating units

For purposes of goodwill impairment testing, cash-generating units to which goodwill has been allocated are aggregated so that the level at which impairment testing is performed reflects the lowest level at which goodwill is monitored for internal reporting purposes, but in any event is not larger than an operating segment. Goodwill acquired in a business combination is allocated to cash-generating units that are expected to generate benefits from the synergies of the combination.

 

For purposes of goodwill impairment testing, when the non-controlling interests are initially measured according to their relative share of the acquiree’s net identifiable assets, the carrying amount of the goodwill is adjusted according to the share which the Group holds in the cash-generating unit to which the goodwill is allocated.

 

F-23

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)

K.Impairment (cont’d)

Recognition of impairment loss

An impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount of an asset or cash-generating unit exceeds its estimated recoverable amount. Impairment losses are recognized in profit or loss. As regards cash-generating units that include goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized when the carrying amount of the cash-generating unit, after including the balance of goodwill, exceeds its recoverable amount. Impairment losses recognized in respect of cash-generating units are allocated first to reduce the carrying amount of any goodwill allocated to the units and then to reduce the carrying amounts of the other assets in the cash-generating unit on a pro rata basis.

 

Allocation of impairment loss to non-controlling interests

If an impairment loss allocated to non-controlling interest relates to goodwill that was not recognized in the consolidated financial statements, the said impairment is not recognized as an impairment loss on goodwill. In such cases, only an impairment loss relating to goodwill that was allocated to the owners of the Company is recognized as an impairment loss on goodwill.

 

F-25

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont'd)

L.Employee benefits

 

(1)Post-employment benefits

 

The Group has a number of post-employment benefit plans. The plans are usually financed by deposits with insurance companies and they are classified as defined contribution plans and defined benefit plans.

 

a.Defined contribution plans

 

A defined contribution plan is a post-employment benefit plan under which the Group pays fixed contributions into a separate entity and has no legal or constructive obligation to pay further amounts.

 

The Group’s obligations for contributions to defined contribution pension plans are recognized as an employee benefit expense in the statement of income in the periods during which services are rendered by employees.

 

b.Defined benefit plans

 

The Group’s net obligation in respect of defined benefit pension plans is calculated separately for each plan by estimating the amount of future benefit that employees have earned in return for their service in the current and prior periods. That benefit is presented at its present value, and the fair value of any plan assets is deducted. The calculation is performed annually by a qualified actuary. The discount rate is the yield at the reporting date on high-quality linked corporate debentures denominated in NIS, with maturity dates approximating the terms of the Group’s obligations.

 

Net interest costs on a defined benefit plan are calculated by applying the discount rate used to measure the defined benefit obligation at the beginning of the annual period to the then-net defined benefit liability.

 

The Group elected to recognize the interest costs that were recognized in profit or loss under financing expenses.

 

F-24

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)

L.Employee benefits (con’t)

Remeasurement of the net defined benefit liability comprises actuarial gains and losses and the return on plan assets (excluding interest). Remeasurements are recognized immediately directlyin retained earnings through other comprehensive income.

 

When the benefits of a plan are improved or curtailed, the portion of the increased benefit relating to past service by employees or the gain or loss on curtailment are recognized immediately in profit or loss when the plan improvement or curtailment occurs.

 

(2)Other long-term employee benefits

 

The Group’s net obligation in respect of long-term employee benefits other than pension plans is the amount of future benefit that employees have earned in return for their service in the current and prior periods. The amount of these benefits is stated at its present value. The discount rate is the yield at the reporting date on high-quality linked corporate debentures denominated in NIS, with maturity dates approximating the terms of the Group’s obligations. Any actuarial gains or losses are recognized in the statement of income in the period in which they arise.

F-26

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont'd)

L.Employee benefits (cont'd)

 

(3)Benefits for early retirement and dismissal

 

Termination benefits are recognized as an expense when the Group is committed demonstrably, without realistic possibility of withdrawal, to a formal detailed plan to terminate employment before the normal retirement date. Termination benefits for voluntary redundancies are recognized as an expense if the Group has made an offer of voluntary redundancy, it is probable that the offer will be accepted, and the number of acceptances can be estimated reliably.

 

(4)Short-term benefits

 

Short-term employee benefit obligations are measured on an undiscounted basis and are expensed as the related service is provided. A liability is recognized for the amount expected to be paid under short-term cash bonus or profit-sharing plans if the Group has a present legal or constructive obligation to pay this amount as a result of past service provided by the employee and the obligation can be estimated reliably.

 

The employee benefits are classified, for measurement purposes, as short-term benefits or as other long-term benefits depending on the date when the benefits are expected to be to be wholly settled.

 

In the statement of financial position the employee benefits are classified as current benefits or as non-current benefits according to the time the liability is due to be settled.

 

M.Provisions

 

A provision is recognized if, as a result of a past event, the Group has a present legal or constructive obligation that can be estimated reliably, and it is more likely than not that an outflow of economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation.

F-25

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)

M.Provisions (con’t)

 

(1)Legal claims

 

Contingent liabilities are accounted for according to IAS 37 and its related provisions. Accordingly, the claims are classified by likelihood of realization of the exposure to risk, as follows:

 

a.More likely than not - more than 50% probability

 

b.Possible - probability higher than unlikely and less than 50%

 

c.Remote - probability of 10% or less

 

For claims which the Group has a legal or constructive obligation as a result of a past event, which are more likely than not to be realized, the financial statements include provisions which, in the opinion of the Group, based, among other things, on the opinions of its legal advisers retained in respect of those claims, are appropriate to the circumstances of each case, despite the claims being denied by the Group companies. There are also a few recently filed legal proceedings for which the risks cannot be assessed at this stage, therefore no provisions have been made.

F-27

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont'd)

M.Provisions (cont'd)

 

Note 20 describe the amount of additional exposure due to contingent liabilities that are likely to be realized.

 

(2)Site restoration and clearing costs

 

A provision in respect of an obligation to restore and clear sites is recognized for those rental agreements where the Group has an undertaking to restore the rental property to its original state at the end of the rental period, after dismantling and transferring the site, and restoring it as necessary. The provisions are determined by discounting the expected future cash flows. The carrying amount of the provision is adjusted each period to reflect the time that has passed and is recognized as a financing expense.

 

(3)N.Warranty

A subsidiary recognizes a provision for warranty expenses in respect of first-year warranty for cellular handsets. The warranty is limited to technical malfunctions defined by the subsidiary, and does not include warranty as a result of customer damage. However, an asset is recognized in respect of the manufacturer’s warranty for those handsets, which is limited to technical malfunctions defined by the manufacturer.

N.Revenues

 

Revenues are measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable, net of returns, trade discounts and volume rebates.

 

(1)Equipment sales

 

Revenues from sales of terminal equipment are recognized in the statement of income when the significant risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred to the buyer, recovery of the consideration is probable, the associated costs and possible return of goods can be estimated reliably and the Group companies have no continuing involvement with the goods.

 

F-26

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)

N.Revenues (cont’d)

Revenues from the sale of terminal equipment to subscribers in long-term credit arrangements are recognized upon delivery to the customer at the present value of the future cash flow expected from them,at the appropriate interest rate for transactions of this kind (see Note 7). Financing income in respect of these transactions is recognized in the statement of income over the period of the installments using the effective interest method.

 

 (2)Revenues from services

 

Revenues from services rendered are recognized in the statement of income proportionately over the term of the agreement or upon providing the service if the flow of the economic benefits associated with providing the service is probable. Revenues from calls, including revenues from prepaid call cards, are recognized when the call is made by the customer.likely.

F-28

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont'd)

N.Revenues (cont'd)

 

(3)Reporting gross or net revenues

 

When the Group acts as an agent or intermediary without bearing the risks and rewards deriving from the transaction, its revenues are recognized on a net basis (as profit or commission). The Group operates as an agent mainly for certain content services provided by other suppliers and payment is collected by the Group. However, when the Group acts as principal and bears the risks and rewards associated with the transaction, its revenues are recognized on a gross basis (such as interconnect fees).

 

 O.Financing income and expense

 

Financing incomeFinance expenses comprises interest income from deposits, interest and CPI linkage income from loans to an associated company,mainly interest income accrued using the effective interest method in respect of the sale of terminal equipment in installments, gains on the disposal of available-for-sale financial assets,interest income from deposits and changes in the fair value of financial assets at fair value through the statement of income.profit or loss.

 

Financing expense comprisesFinance expenses include mainly interest and linkage expenseexpenses on borrowings received and debentures issued changes in the fair value of financial assets at fair value through the statement of income, impairment losses recognized on financial assets (except for a provision for doubtful debts, which is recognized under operating and general expenses), and financing expenses for provisions arising from legal claims.

 

In the statementstatements of cash flows,interest received and dividends received are presented as part of cash flows from investing activities. The Group elected to present interest and linkage differences paid for loans and debentures under cash flows used for financing activities.

 

 P.Income tax expense

 

Income tax expense comprises current and deferred tax and is recognized in the statement of income, or in other comprehensive income to the extent it relates to items recognized in other comprehensive income.

 

Current taxes

Current tax is the expected tax payable on the taxable income for the year, using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date. Current taxes also include taxes in respect of prior years.

 

Uncertain tax positions

A provision for uncertain tax positions, including additional tax and interest expenses, is recognized when it is more likely than not that the Group will have to use its economic resources to pay the obligation.

 

 F-29F-27 

 

  

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

 

Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont'd)(cont’d)

 

 P.Income tax expense (cont'd)(cont’d)

 

Deferred taxes

 

Deferred tax is recognized in respect of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for taxation purposes. The Group does not recognize deferred taxes for the following temporary differences:

 

Initial recognition of goodwill.goodwill.
   
Differences arising from investment in subsidiaries and associates, if it is probable that they will not reverse in the foreseeable future and if the Group controls the date of reversal.

Deferred tax is measured at the tax rates that are expected to be applied to temporary differences when they reverse, based on the laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the reporting date.

 

A deferred tax asset is recognized for carry-forward losses, tax benefits and deductible temporary differences, to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profits will be available against which they can be utilized. Deferred tax assets are reviewed at each reporting date and are reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that the related tax benefit will be realized.

 

Offsetting deferred tax assets and liabilities

 

The Group sets off deferred tax assets and liabilities if there is a legally enforceable right to offset deferred tax liabilities and assets, and they relate to income taxes levied by the same tax authority on the same taxable entity, but they intend to settle deferred tax liabilities and assets on a net basis or their tax assets and liabilities will be realized simultaneously.

 

Presentation of tax expenses in the statement of cash flows

Cash flows arising from taxes on income are classified in the statement of cash flows as cash flows from operating activities, unless they can be specifically identified with investing and financing activities.

 Q.Earnings per share

 

The Group presents basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) data for its ordinary shares. Basic EPS is calculated by dividing the profit or loss attributable to ordinary shareholders of the Company by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the year. Diluted EPS is determined by adjusting the profit or loss attributable to ordinary shareholders and the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding for the effects of all dilutive potential ordinary shares, which comprise warrants and share options granted to employees.

 

 R.Dividend

 

An obligation relating to a dividend proposed or declared after the reporting date is recognized only in the period in which the declaration was made (approved by the general shareholders'shareholders’ meeting). In the statement of cash flows,dividend paid is presented as part of cash flows used in financing activities.

 

F-28

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)

S.New standards and interpretations not yet adopted
(1)IFRS 9, Financial Instruments (“IFRS 9”)

IFRS 9 replaces the current guidance in IAS 39, Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement. The new Standard includes revised guidance on the classification and measurement of financial instruments, a new ‘expected credit loss’ model for calculating impairment for most financial assets, and new guidance and requirements with respect to hedge accounting.

IFRS 9 is effective for annual periods beginning on January 1, 2018, with early adoption being permitted. IFRS 9 will be applied retrospectively, except for a number of exemptions.

The Group has examined the effects of applying IFRS 9, and in its opinion the effect on the financial statements will be immaterial.

(2)IFRS 15, Revenues from Contracts with Customers (“IFRS 15”)

IFRS 15 replaces the current guidance regarding recognition of revenues and presents a new model for recognizing revenue from contracts with customers. IFRS 15 provides two approaches for recognizing revenue: at a point in time or over time. The model includes five steps for analyzing transactions so as to determine when to recognize revenue and at what amount.

IFRS 15 is applicable for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2018 and earlier application is permitted. The Group decided to early apply IFRS 15 as from January 1, 2017, using the cumulative catch-up approach, without restatement of comparative figures, by adjusting the balance of retained earnings as at January 1, 2017 with application of the practical expedient at the transition date, according to which the cumulative catch-up approach will only be applied for contracts not yet competed at the transition date.

The main effect on the Group of application of IFRS 15 is the accounting treatment for the incremental costs of obtaining a contract with a customer (“Subscriber Acquisition”), which, in accordance with IFRS 15, are recognized as an asset when it is probable that the Group will recover these costs, and not only where there is an obligation of the customer to acquire services from the Company for a defined period. Accordingly, direct commissions paid to agents and sales employees for sales and upgrades under agreements that do not include an obligation period of the customer, are recognized as an asset for obtaining a contract instead of an expense in the statement of income. The contracts that are renewed every month and that may be cancelled by the customer at any time, without any penalty, are contracts were completed at the date of initial application of IFRS 15. Accordingly, the Group chose, under the practical expedient included in the transitional provisions of IFRS 15, not to apply IFRS 15 for contracts that ended prior to January 1, 2017, therefore the Subscriber Acquisition costs incurred prior to January 1, 2017 and were recognized in the statement of income as an expense, will not be accounted for retrospectively. Other than the accounting treatment of Subscriber Acquisition costs, the Group does not expect there to be any other material effects arising from application of IFRS 15.

F-29

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)

S.New standards and interpretations not yet adopted (cont’d)

(2)IFRS 15, Revenues from Contracts with Customers (“IFRS 15”) (cont’d)

In view of the above, adoption of IFRS 15 is not expected to have a material effect on the retained earnings at the transition date. Subscriber Acquisition amortization expenses will be recognized in the statement of income at the expected average duration of the subscribers.

The effect of the application of IFRS 15 on the financial results for 2017 will depend on Subscriber Acquisition costs incurred by the Group in 2017 and the estimated expected average duration of subscribers acquired by the Group in 2017.

(3)IFRS 16, Financial Instruments (“IFRS 16”)

IFRS 16 replaces IAS 17, Leases and its related interpretations. The standard’s instructions annul the existing requirement for lessees to classify leases as operating or finance leases. Instead, for lessees, the new standard presents a unified model for the accounting treatment of all leases according to which the lessee has to recognize an asset and liability in respect of the lease in its financial statements IFRS 16 also establishes new and more extensive disclosure requirements. IFRS 16 is applicable for annual periods as from January 1, 2019, with the possibility of early adoption, provided the Group has also early adopted IFRS 15, Revenue from Contracts with Customers.

IFRS 16 includes several alternative transitional provisions, so that companies can choose between one of the following alternatives at initial application: full retrospective application or application (with the possibility of certain practical expedients) as from the mandatory effective date, with an adjustment to the balance of retained earnings at that date. The Group is still examining the alternatives for initial application of IFRS 16.

The Group is also examining the anticipated effects of IFRS 16 on the financial statements, but at this stage, it is unable to reliably estimate the quantitative impact on its financial statements.

IFRS 16 is expected to affect the accounting treatment of real estate leasing agreements, cellular sites, vehicles and other assets. The Group believes that IFRS 16 will have a material effect on its financial statements in the following issues:

a.Application of IFRS 16 is expected to decrease the Group’s operating expenses and increase depreciation expenses and financing expenses.
b.An increase in non-current assets and liabilities is expected.
c.An increase in cash flow from operating activities and a decrease in cash flow from financing activities are expected.
d.Due to the change in assets and liabilities, a change in financial ratios and financial information is expected, such as a decrease in the Group’s working capital.

It should be noted that the Group is still examining the effect of IFRS 16 on the Group’s financial statements, therefore the list of issues presented above represents issues that the Group has identified up to the authorization date of the financial statements, and additional subjects may be added to the list. The issues presented may require adjustment as the examination of the effects of the application of IFRS 16 progresses.

 F-30 

 

 

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies (cont'd)

S.New standards and interpretations not yet adopted

StandardSubjectImplementation and transition provisionsExpected effects
IFRS 9 (2014), Financial InstrumentsIFRS 9 (2014) replaces the requirements included in IAS 39 regarding classification and measurement of financial assets and financial liabilities, hedge accounting, and impairment of financial instruments.IFRS 9 (2014) will be effective for annual periods starting from January 1, 2018. Early application is permitted. IFRS 9 (2014) will be applied retrospectively, except for a number of exemptions.The Group is examining the effects of adopting IFRS 9 (2014) on the financial statements.
IFRS 15, Revenues from Contracts with CustomersIFRS 15 replaces current guidelines for revenue recognition and presents a new model for recognition of revenues from contracts with customers. The model includes five steps for analyzing transactions to determine the timing and amount of revenue recognition. IFRS 15 also establishes new and more extensive disclosure requirements.IFRS 15 (2014) will be effective for annual periods starting from January 1, 2018. Early application is permitted. IFRS 15 includes various alternatives for the transition guidelines, so that companies may choose one alternative upon initial application.The Group is examining the effects of adopting IFRS 15.
IFRS 16, Leases

The standard replaces the previous instructions under IAS. For lessees, IFRS 16 eliminates the current classification of leases as either operating leases or finance leases and introduces a single lessee accounting model for all leases on a balance sheet (other than a number of exceptions), which are substantially similar to the accounting treatment for finance leases today. By contrast, the accounting treatment in the lessors' financial statements is expected to remain the same as the accounting treatment today.

In addition, the standard establishes new and expanded disclosure requirements, both by lessors and by the lessees.

The standard will be effective for annual periods starting from January 1, 2019. Early application is possible, provided that the Company also applies IFRS 15, Revenue from Contracts with Customers.

The Group will examine the effects of adopting IFRS 16.
Amendments to IAS 38 Intangible Assets

The amendment to IAS 38 introduces a rebuttable presumption that a revenue-based amortization method for intangible assets is inappropriate. The purpose of the amendment is to restrict the use of revenue-based amortization, and therefore companies that want to continue amortizing an intangible asset using that method will have to show that the revenue and consumption of the economic benefits are highly correlated.

The amendments are to be applied on a prospective basis for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2016 with earlier application being permitted.

In the opinion of the Group, application of the amendments will have no material effect on the financial statements.

F-31

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

 

Note 4 - Segment Reporting

 

The Group operates in various segments in the communications sector and every company in the Group operates in one separate business segment. The primary reporting format, by business segments, is based on the Group'sGroup’s management and internal reporting structure.

 

Each company provides services in the segment in which it operates, using the property, plant and equipment and the infrastructure it owns. The infrastructure of each company is used only for providing its services. Each of the companies in the Group is exposed to different risks and yield expectations, mainly with respect to the technology and competition in the segment in which it operates. Accordingly, the separable components in the Group are each company in the Group.

 

The Group’s investment in DBS was accounted for using the equity method up to March 23, 2015. As from this date, the financial statements of DBS are consolidated with the financial statements of the Group as described in Note 12B below. The Group reports on multichannel television as an operating segment without adjustment to ownership rates and excess cost in all reporting periods.

 

Based on the above, the business segments of the Group are as follows:

 

 -Bezeq - The Israel Telecommunication Corp. Ltd.: fixed line domestic communications
 -Pelephone Communications Ltd.: cellular communications
-Bezeq International Ltd.: international communications, internet services and network end point
 -DBS Satellite Services (1998) Ltd.: multichannel television

 

The other companies in the Group are presented under the "Other"“Other” item. Other operations include call center services (Bezeq Online) and online shopping and classified ads (through Walla). These operations are not reported as reporting segments as they do not fulfill the quantitative thresholds.

 

Inter-segment pricing is set at the price determined in a transaction between unrelated parties.

 

The results, assets and liabilities of a segment include items directly attributable to that segment, as well as those that can be allocated on a reasonable basis.

 

Segment capital expenditure is the total cost incurred during the period for acquisition of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets.

 

F-31

After DBS became a wholly-owned subsidiary of

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Company on June 24, 2015, the Company updated the internal management reporting structure for financing income for the shareholders loans that were provided to DBS. Accordingly, the Company restated financing income under the separate interim financial information. As from 2015, the Company no longer recognizes financing income for the shareholders loans under the financing income of the fixed-line domestic communications segment. Financing expensesConsolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in the multichannel television segment include financing expenses for the loans without any change. The comparative figures were restated to reflect the change in the reporting structure: financing income in the amount of NIS 213 was eliminated in the fixed-line domestic communications segment for the year ended December 31, 2014, and NIS 226 in the year ended December 31, 2013.millions except where otherwise stated)

 

Note 4 - Segment Reporting (cont’d)

A.Operating Segments (cont’d)

  Year ended December 31, 2014 
  Domestic
fixed–line communications
  Cellular communications  International communications and Internet services  Multi-channel television  Others  Adjustments  Consolidated 
  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS 
Revenue from external entities 4,045  3,361  1,419  1,724  209  (1,724)9,034 
Inter-segment revenues  272   58   85   -   17   (411)  21 
Total revenue  4,317   3,419   1,504   1,724   226   (2,135)  9,055 
Depreciation and amortization  688   430   130   298   23   304   1,873 
Segment results - operating income  1,980   449   232   273   629   (984)  2,579 
Finance income  285   77   9   26   11   217   625 
Finance expenses  (472)  (21)  (18)  (619)  (2)  (104)  (1,236)
Total financing income (expense), net  (187)  56   (9)  (593)  9   113   (611)
Segment profit (loss) after finance expenses, net  1,793   505   223   (320)  638   (871)  1,968 
Share in profit (loss) of equity-accounted investee  -   -   1   -   (3)  (168)  (170)
Segment profit (loss) before income tax  1,793   505   224   (320)  635   (1,039)  1,798 
Income tax  478   132   60   1   147   (151)  667 
Segment results - net profit (loss)  1,315   373   164   (321)  488   (888)  1,131 
Additional information:                            
Segment assets  8,483   3,541   1,206   1,820   682   1,765   17,498 
Goodwill  -   -   6   -   10   2,665   2,681 
Investment in equity-accounted investee  -   -   4   -   11   1,042   1,057 
Segment liabilities  12,369   696   392   6,484   107   (2,400)  17,648 
Investments in property, plant and equipment and intangible assets  835   339   110   332   17   (332)  1,301 

 F-32 

 

 

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

 

Note 4 - Segment Reporting (cont'd)(cont’d)

 

A.A.Operating Segments (cont’d)

 

 Year ended December 31, 2013  Year ended December 31, 2015 
 Domestic
fixed–line communications
  Cellular communications  International communications and Internet services  Multi-channel television  Others  Adjustments  Consolidated  Domestic
fixed–line communications
  Cellular communications  International communications and Internet services  Multi-channel television  Others  Adjustments  Consolidated 
 NIS NIS NIS NIS NIS NIS NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS 
Revenue from external entities  4,198   3,741   1,365   1,633   241   (1,633)  9,545  4,122 2,831  1,485  1,774  197  (440) 9,969 
Inter-segment revenues  280   68   68   2   21   (421)  18   285   59   93   -   24   (445)  16 
Total revenue  4,478   3,809   1,433   1,635   262   (2,054)  9,563   4,407   2,890   1,578   1,774   221   (885)  9,985 
Depreciation and amortization  683   458   130   263   31   449   2,014   725   419   132   322   13   520   2,131 
Segment results - operating income  1,991   608   227   268   (4)  (1,055)  2,035   2,148   157   240   250   (15)  (763)  2,017 
Finance income  314   137   9   7   -   56   523   30   53   7   32   17   15   154 
Finance expenses  (534)  (46)  (23)  (654)  (6)  420   (843)  (362)  (4)  (15)  (635)  (2)  329   (689)
Total finance income (expense), net  (220)  91   (14)  (647)  (6)  476   (320)
Total financing income (expense), net  (332)  49   (8)  (603)  15   344   (535)
Segment profit (loss) after finance expenses, net  1,771   699   213   (379)  (10)  (579)  1,715   1,816   206   232   (353)  -   (419)  1,482 
Share in losses of equity-accounted investee  -   -   1   -   -   (253)  (252)
Share in profit (loss) of equity-accounted investee  -   -   -   -   (2)  14   12 
Segment profit (loss) before income tax  1,771   699   214   (379)  (10)  (832)  1,463   1,816   206   232   (353)  (2)  (405)  1,494 
Income tax  408   178   56   2   5   (125)  524   492   55   60   1   -   (250)  358 
Segment results - net profit (loss)  1,363   521   158   (381)  (15)  (707)  939   1,324   151   172   (354)  (2)  (155)  1,136 
Additional information:                                                        
Segment assets  7,767   4,126   1,248   1,617   232   2,253   17,243   7,311   3,269   1,160   1,667   659   4,965   19,031 
Goodwill  -   -   6   -   87   2,732   2,825   -   -   6   -   10   3,050   3,066 
Investment in equity-accounted investee  -   -   3   -   14   998   1,015   -   -   4   -   7   14   25 
Segment liabilities  11,234   1,242   440   5,960   249   (1,954)  17,171   12,117   513   343   6,685   104   (1,031)  18,731 
Investments in property, plant and                            
equipment and intangible assets  777   335   106   327   19   (327)  1,237 
Investments in property, plant and equipment and intangible assets  837   419   127   281   33   (80)  1,617 

 

 F-33 

 

 

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

 

Note 4 - Segment Reporting (cont'd)(cont’d)

 

A.Operating Segments (cont’d)

 

 Year ended December 31, 2014  Year ended December 31, 2016 
 Domestic
fixed–line communications
  Cellular communications  International communications and Internet services  Multi-channel television  Others  Adjustments  Consolidated  Domestic
fixed–line communications
 Cellular communications International communications and Internet services Multi-channel television Others Adjustments Consolidated 
 NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS NIS NIS NIS NIS NIS NIS 
Revenue from external entities  4,045   3,361   1,419   1,724   209   (1,724)  9,034  4,063  2,587  1,478  1,745  198  - 10,071 
Inter-segment revenues  272   58   85   -   17   (411)  21   320   43   70   -   20   (440)  13 
Total revenue  4,317   3,419   1,504   1,724   226   (2,135)  9,055   4,383   2,630   1,548   1,745   218   (440)  10,084 
Depreciation and amortization  688   430   130   298   23   304   1,873   717   380   137   296   16   615   2,161 
Segment results - operating income  1,980   449   232   273   629   (984)  2,579   2,076   32   176   264   (34)  (648)  1,866 
Finance income  285   77   9   26   11   217   625   30   52   5   13   4   19   123 
Finance expenses  (472)  (21)  (18)  (619)  (2)  (104)  (1,236)  (475)  (6)  (15)  (539)  (2)  (17)  (1,054)
Total finance income (expense), net  (187)  56   (9)  (593)  9   113   (611)
Total financing income (expense), net  (445)  46   (10)  (526)  2   2   (931)
Segment profit (loss) after finance expenses, net  1,793   505   223   (320)  638   (871)  1,968   1,631   78   166   (262)  (32)  (646)  935 
Share in profit (loss) of equity-accounted investee  -   -   1   -   (3)  (168)  (170)  -   -   1   -   (5)  (1)  (5)
Segment profit (loss) before income tax  1,793   505   224   (320)  635   (1,039)  1,798   1,631   78   167   (262)  (37)  (647)  930 
Income tax  478   132   60   1   147   (151)  667   399   17   42   (330)  -   314   442 
Segment results - net profit (loss)  1,315   373   164   (321)  488   (888)  1,131   1,232   61   125   68   (37)  (961)  488 
Additional information:                                                        
Segment assets  8,483   3,541   1,206   1,820   682   1,765   17,498   7,111   3,294   1,177   2,026   193   3,260   17,061 
Goodwill  -   -   6   -   10   2,665   2,681   -   -   6   -   10   3,050   3,066 
Investment in equity-accounted investee  -   -   4   -   11   1,042   1,057   -   -   5   -   1   12   18 
Segment liabilities  12,369   696   392   6,484   107   (2,400)  17,648   11,988   569   380   1,434   104   2,369   16,844 
Investments in property, plant and equipment and intangible assets  835   339   110   332   17   (332)  1,301   828   277   126   227   13   -   1,471 

 

 F-34 

 

 

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

 

Note 4 - Segment Reporting (cont'd)(cont’d)

 

A.B.Operating SegmentsAdjustments for segment reporting of revenue, profit or loss, assets and liabilities

 

  Year ended December 31, 2015 
  Domestic
fixed–line communications
  Cellular communications  International communications and Internet services  Multi-channel television  Others  Adjustments  Consolidated 
  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS 
Revenue from external entities  4,122   2,831   1,485   1,774   197   (440)  9,969 
Inter-segment revenues  285   59   93   -   24   (445)  16 
Total revenue  4,407   2,890   1,578   1,774   221   (885)  9,985 
Depreciation and amortization  725   419   132   322   13   520   2,131 
Segment results - operating income  2,148   157   240   250   (15)  (763)  2,017 
Finance income  30   53   7   32   17   15   154 
Finance expenses  (362)  (4)  (15)  (635)  (2)  329   (689)
Total finance income (expense), net  (332)  49   (8)  (603)  15   344   (535)
Segment profit (loss) after finance expenses, net  1,816   206   232   (353)  -   (419)  1,482 
Share in profit (loss) of equity-accounted investee  -   -   -   -   (2)  14   12 
Segment profit (loss) before income tax  1,816   206   232   (353)  (2)  (405)  1,494 
Income tax  492   55   60   1   -   (250)  358 
Segment results - net profit (loss)  1,324   151   172   (354)  (2)  (155)  1,136 
Additional information:                            
Segment assets  7,311   3,269   1,160   1,667   659   4,965   19,031 
Goodwill  -   -   6   -   10   3,050   3,066 
Investment in equity-accounted investee  -   -   4   -   7   14   25 
Segment liabilities  12,117   513   343   6,685   104   (1,031)  18,731 
Investments in property, plant and equipment and intangible assets  837   419   127   281   33   (80)  1,617 
   Year ended December 31, 
   2014  2015  2016 
   NIS  NIS  NIS 
           
 Revenue         
 Revenue from reporting segments  10,964   10,649   10,306 
 Revenue from other segments  226   221   218 
 Elimination of revenue from inter-segment sales except for revenue from sales to an associate reporting as a segment  (411)  (445)  (440)
 Elimination of revenue for a segment classified as an associate  (1,724)  (440)  - 
 Consolidated revenue  9,055   9,985   10,084 

   Year ended December 31, 
   2014  2015  2016 
   NIS  NIS  NIS 
 Profit or loss         
 Operating income for reporting segments 2,934  2,795  2,548 
 Elimination of expenses from a segment classified as an associate  (273)  (59)  - 
 Financing expenses, net  (611)  (535)  (931)
 Share in the losses (profit) of equity-accounted investees  (170)  12   (5)
 Profit (loss) from operations classified in other categories  629   44   (34)
 Depreciation and amortization of intangible assets resulting from the Bezeq PPA adjustments  (644)  (545)  (442)
 Other adjustments  (67)  (218)  (206)
 Consolidated profit before income tax  1,798   1,494   930 

 F-35 

 

 

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

 

Note 4 - Segment Reporting (cont'd)(cont’d)

 

B.Adjustments for segment reporting of revenue, profit or loss, assets and liabilities (cont’d)

 

  Year ended December 31, 
  2013  2014  2015 
  NIS  NIS  NIS 
          
Revenue         
Revenue from reporting segments  11,355   10,964   10,649 
Revenue from other segments  262   226   221 
Elimination of revenue from inter-segment sales except for revenue from sales to an associate reporting as a segment  (421)  (411)  (445)
Elimination of revenue for a segment classified as an associate  (1,633)  (1,724)  (440)
Consolidated revenue  9,563   9,055   9,985 
   December 31, 
   2015  2016 
   NIS  NIS 
        
 Assets      
 Assets from reporting segments  13,417   13,619 
 Assets attributable to operations in other categories  676   204 
 Goodwill not attributable to segment assets  3,050   3,050 
 Investment in an equity-accounted investee  14   12 
 Inter-segment assets  1,165   703 
 Assets resulting from the Bezeq PPA, net  2,561   2,119 
 Assets attributable to a non-reportable segment  1,239   438 
          
 Consolidated assets  22,122   20,145 

 

  Year ended December 31, 
  2013  2014  2015 
  NIS  NIS  NIS 
Profit or loss         
Operating income for reporting segments  3,094   2,934   2,795 
Elimination of expenses from a segment classified            
 as an associate  (268)  (273)  (59)
Financing expenses, net  (320)  (611)  (535)
Share in the losses (profit) of equity-accounted investees  (252)  (170)  12 
Profit (loss) from operations classified in other            
 categories  (4)  629   44 
Depreciation and amortization of intangible assets            
 resulting from the Bezeq PPA adjustments  (768)  (644)  (545)
Other adjustments  (19)  (67)  (218)
Consolidated profit before income tax  1,463   1,798   1,494 
   December 31, 
   2015  2016 
   NIS  NIS 
        
 Liabilities      
 Liabilities from reporting segments  19,658   14,371 
 Liabilities attributable to operations in other categories  104   104 
 Inter-segment liabilities  (5,494)  (730)
 Liabilities resulting from the Bezeq PPA, net  678   491 
 Liabilities attributable to a non-reportable segment  3,785   2,608 
          
 Consolidated liabilities  18,731   16,844 

 

 F-36 

 

 

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 4 - Segment Reporting (cont'd)

B.Adjustments for segment reporting of revenue, profit or loss, assets and liabilities (cont'd)

  December 31, 
  2014  2015 
  NIS  NIS 
       
Assets      
Assets from reporting segments  15,061   13,417 
Assets attributable to operations in other categories  703   676 
Goodwill not attributable to segment assets  2,665   3,050 
Investment in an equity-accounted investee (mainly loans) reported as a segment  1,026   14 
Cancellation of assets for a segment classified as an associate  (1,820)  - 
Inter-segment assets  (681)  1,165 
Assets resulting from the Bezeq PPA, net  3,106   2,561 
Assets attributable to a non-reportable segment  1,176   1,239 
         
Consolidated assets  21,236   22,122 

  December 31, 
  2014  2015 
  NIS  NIS 
       
Liabilities      
Liabilities from reporting segments  19,941   19,658 
Liabilities attributable to operations in other categories  107   104 
Cancellation of liabilities for a segment classified as an associate  (6,484)  - 
Inter-segment liabilities  (692)  (5,494)
Liabilities resulting from the Bezeq PPA, net  837   678 
Liabilities attributable to a non-reportable segment  3,939   3,785 
         
Consolidated liabilities  17,648   18,731 

F-37

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

 

Note 5 - Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

As of December 31, 20142015 and December 31, 2015,2016, cash and cash equivalents include mainly bank deposits with a maturity of up to 90 days.

 

Note 6 - Investments Including Derivatives

 

   December 31, 
   2014  2015 
   NIS  NIS 
        
 Current investments      
 Financial assets held for trading  2,387   912 
 Bank deposits  710   556 
 Monetary funds and others  5   67 
          
    3,102   1,535 
   December 31, 
   2015  2016 
   NIS  NIS 
        
 Current investments      
 Financial assets held for trading  912   321 
 Bank deposits  556   546 
 Monetary funds and others  67   40 
          
    1,535   907 

 

Financial assets held for trading include investments in ETFs, and marketable securities Investments in financial assets held for trading and monetary funds are designated for trading and are presented at fair value as at the reporting date. ETFs at Bezeq were exercisedThe deposits in January 2016, deposits at Bezeq are repayable until April 2016,May 2017 and the other investments atin Bezeq are exercisable in 2016.2017.

 

Note 7 - Trade and Other Receivables

 

 A.Composition of trade and other receivables

 

   December 31, 
   2014  2015 
   NIS  NIS 
        
 Trade receivables, net      
 Outstanding debts  986   841 
 Credit cards and checks receivable  343   434 
 Unbilled receivables  250   240 
 Current maturities of long-term receivables  632   534 
 Related parties  16   9 
 Total trade receivables  2,227   2,058 
 Other receivables and current tax assets        
 Prepaid expenses  103   135 
 Other receivables  112   118 
 Current tax assets  26   16 
 Related parties  2   1 
 Total other receivables  243   270 
 Long-term trade and other receivables        
 Trade receivables- open debts (1)  531   509 
 Long term receivables (from real estate sales)  35   165 
    566   674 
    3,036   3,002 
   December 31, 
   2015  2016 
   NIS  NIS 
        
 Trade receivables, net      
 Outstanding debts  841   785 
 Credit cards and checks receivable  434   450 
 Unbilled receivables  240   241 
 Current maturities of long-term receivables  534   505 
 Related parties  9   19 
 Total trade receivables  2,058   2,000 
 Other receivables and current tax assets        
 Prepaid expenses  135   145 
 Other receivables  118   71 
 Current tax assets  16   - 
 Related parties  1   - 
 Total other receivables  270   216 
 Long-term trade and other receivables        
 Trade receivables- open debts (1)  509   445 
 Long term receivables (from real estate sales)  165   199 
    674   644 
    3,002   2,860 

 

(1)Discounted interest rates for long-term trade payables are based the estimated credit risk of trade payables. The discounted interest rates used by the Bezeq Group in 20152016 are 3.3% - 3.5% (in 2015: 3.4% - 4.6% (in 2014: 3.6% - 4.3%).

Long-term trade and other receivables are repayable until 2019.

 

 F-38F-37 

 

 

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

 

Note 7 - Trade and Other Receivables (cont'd)(cont’d)

 

 B.Change in provision for doubtful debts during the year

 

   December 31, 
   2014  2015 
   NIS  NIS 
        
 Balance at January 1  38   15 
 Impaired loss recognized  30   34 
 Lost debts  (53)  (32)
 Balance at December 31  15   17 
   December 31, 
   2015  2016 
   NIS  NIS 
        
 Balance at January 1  174   173 
 Impaired loss recognized  34   25 
 Lost debts  (35)  (87)
 Balance at December 31  173   111 

 

 C.Aging of trade receivables

 

The aging of trade receivables at the reporting date was as follow:

 

   December 31, 2014  December 31, 2015 
   Gross  Impairment  Gross  Impairment 
   NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS 
              
 Current  2,596   (1)  2,367   (1)
 Past due up to one year  118   (5)  159   (5)
 Past due one to two years  31   (5)  29   (5)
 Past due more than two years  28   (4)  29   (6)
    2,773   (15)  2,584   (17)
   December 31, 2015  December 31, 2016 
   Gross  Impairment  Gross  Impairment 
   NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS 
              
 Current  2,377   (11)  2,282   (8)
 Past due up to one year  201   (47)  183   (46)
 Past due one to two years  74   (50)  50   (31)
 Past due more than two years  88   (65)  41   (26)
    2,740   (173)  2,556   (111)

 

 F-39F-38 

 

 

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

 

Note 8 - Property, Plant and Equipment

    Switching          
    Transmission,   Multi-   Office  
    power,   channel   equipment,  
    Cellular,   equipment   computers  
  Land and And satellite Network and Subscriber and  
  buildings equipment equipment infrastructure equipment vehicles Total
  NIS NIS NIS NIS NIS NIS NIS
                             
Cost                            
Balance as at January 1, 2014  1,004   4,100   4,798      792   842   11,536 
Additions  43   328   453      203   82   1,109 
Disposals (including transfers to                            
  assets held for sale)  82   (3)        (17)  (42)  20 
Balance as at December 31, 2014  1,129   4,425   5,251      978   882   12,665 
                             
Balance as at January 1, 2015  1,129   4,425   5,251      978   882   12,665 
Additions  41   527   254   164   225   71   1,282 
Consolidation of subsidiary  16         749      36   801 
Disposals (including transfers                            
 from assets held for sale)  (141)            (141)
Balance as at December 31, 2015  1,045   4,952   5,505   913   1,203   989   14,607 
                             
Depreciation and impairment  losses                            
Balance as at January 1, 2014  241   1,810   2,018      429   497   4,995 
Depreciation for the year  72   567   246      158   97   1,140 
Disposals (including transfers to                            
  assets held for sale)     (2)        (14)  (26)  (42)
Balance as at December 31, 2014  313   2,375   2,264      573   568   6,093 
                             
Balance as at January 1, 2015  313   2,375   2,264      573   568   6,093 
Depreciation for the year  76   576   222   189   197   96   1,356 
Disposals (including transfers to                  ��         
  assets held for sale)  (39)             (39)
Balance as at December 31, 2015  350   2,951   2,486   189   770   664   7,410 
                             
Carrying amounts                            
As at January 1, 2014  763   2,290   2,780      363   345   6,541 
As at December 31, 2014  816   2,050   2,987      405   314   6,572 
As at December 31, 2015  695   2,001   3,019   724   433   325   7,197 

     Switching                
     Transmission,     Multi-     Office    
     power,     channel     equipment,    
     Cellular,     equipment     computers    
  Land and  And satellite  Network  and  Subscriber  and    
  buildings  equipment  equipment  infrastructure  equipment  vehicles  Total 
  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS 
                      
Cost                     
Balance as at January 1,  2015 1,145  4,473  5,251  -  978  834  12,681 
Additions  41   527   254   164   225   71   1,282 
Consolidation of subsidiary  16   -   -   749   -   36   801 
Disposals  (141)  -   -   (46)  -   -   (187)
Balance as at December 31, 2015  1,061   5,000   5,505   867   1,203   941   14,577 
                             
Balance as at January 1, 2016  1,061   5,000   5,505   867   1,203   941   14,577 
Additions  27   457   247   180   265   73   1,249 
Disposals  (37)  -   (12)  (11)  (4)  (11)  (75)
Balance as at December 31, 2016  1,051   5,457   5,740   1,036   1,464   1,003   15,751 
                             
Depreciation and impairment losses                            
Balance as at January 1, 2015  313   2,375   2,264   -   573   568   6,093 
Depreciation for the year  76   576   222   189   197   96   1,356 
Disposals  (39)  -   -   (46)  -   -   (85)
Balance as at December 31, 2015  350   2,951   2,486   143   770   664   7,364 
                             
Balance as at January 1, 2016  350   2,951   2,486   143   770   664   7,364 
Depreciation for the year  64   521   250   236   183   83   1,337 
Disposals  (12)  -   -   (10)  -   -   (22)
Balance as at December 31, 2016  402   3,472   2,736   369   953   747   8,679 
                             
Carrying amounts                            
As at January 1, 2015  816   2,050   2,987   -   405   314   6,572 
As at December 31, 2015  711   2,049   3,019   724   433   277   7,213 
As at December 31, 2016  649   1,985   3,004   667   511   256   7,072 
 F-40F-39 

 

 

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

 

Note 8 - Property, Plant and Equipment (cont’d)

 

A.The residual value of the Bezeq Group’s copper cables is assessed at the end of each reporting period.quarter. The residual value is NIS 190154 as at December 31, 2016 and NIS 140 as at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2015, respectively. The change in the residual value resulted primarily from the price of copper.2015.

 

B.Property, plant and equipment in the Bezeq Group is derecognized at the end of each year upon reaching full depreciation, except for land, buildings, vehicles, copper cables and specific components for Pelephone’s UMTS network, which are derecognized upon their sale. In 2016, the Bezeq Group derecognized fully depreciated property at a cost of NIS 894 (in 2015, NIS 557).

C.Bezeq Group companies review the useful life of the property, plant and equipment through thetheir depreciation committees, in order to determine the estimated useful life of their equipment. The change is not expected to have a material impact on the depreciation expenses of the Group. Following the findings of the committees, minor changes were made in the estimated useful life of certain assets.

 

C.D.Most of the real estate assets used by the Bezeq Group are leased under a capitalized finance lease from the Israel Lands Administration for 49 years beginning as of 1993, with an option for an extension of another 49 years. The lease rights are amortized over the term of the lease period.

 

D.E.In 2013, Bezeq started to install a national fiber-opticfiber optic network that will reach as close as possible to customer homes. Thethe subscriber’s home. As at December 31, 2016, the unexercised investment in assets that are not yet operational amounts to NIS 294 as of December 31, 2015.352.

 

E.F.At the reporting date, there are commitments to purchase property, plant and equipment in the amount of NIS 75139 (in 2014:2015: NIS 88)75).

 

F.G.In accordance with the Telecommunications Order (Telecommunications and Broadcasts) (Determination of Essential Service Provided by Bezeq - The Israel Telecommunication Corp. Ltd.), 1997, approval from the Minister of Communications is required to confer rights in some of Bezeq'sBezeq’s assets (switches, cable network, transmission network, and information and databases).

G.H.In accordance with its cellular license, Pelephone is not permitted to sell, lease or pledge any of its assets used for the implementation of the license, without the consent of the Minister of Communications, except for:

 

(1)A pledge on one of the license assets in favor of a bank operating lawfully in Israel, to receive bank credit, provided that it submitted notice to the Ministry of Communications regarding the pledge it intends to register, noting that the pledge agreement includes a clause ensuring that in any event, exercise of the rights by the bank will not impair, in any way, the services provided under the license.

(2)Sale of items of equipment when implementing an upgrade, including sale of equipment by the trade-in method.

 

H.I.For information about pledges for loans and borrowings, see Note 13.

 

 F-41F-40 

 

 

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

 

Note 9 - Intangible Assets

 

            Subscribers       Computer    Customer      
            acquisition        software Right of use relationships      
    Customer   Brand  Computer     costs and        and in cellular and      
 Goodwill  relationships  name  software  Licenses  other  Total  Goodwill licenses frequencies brand names Others Total 
 NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS NIS NIS NIS NIS NIS 
                            
Cost                            
Balance as at January 1, 2014  2,825   5,163   1,310   1,137   350   223   11,008 
Acquisitions or additions from independent development  -   -   -   162   -   15   177 
Loss of control  (132)  -   (86)  -   -   -   (218)
Impairment  (12)  -   -   -   -   -   (12)
                            
Balance as at December 31, 2014  2,681   5,163   1,224   1,299   350   238   10,955 
                            
Balance as at January 1, 2015  2,681   5,163   1,224   1,299   350   238   10,955  2,681  1,256  384  6,342  292  10,955 
Acquisitions or additions from independent development  -   -   -   188   96   28   312   -   188   96   -   28   312 
Business combination  385   790   347   148   -   -   1,670   385   148   -   1,137   -   1,670 
Disposals  -   -   -   -  -   (51)  (51)  -   -   -   -   (51)  (51)
                                                    
Balance as at December 31, 2015  3,066   5,953   1,571   1,635   446   215   12,886   3,066   1,592   480   7,479   269   12,886 
                                                    
Balance as at January 1, 2016  3,066   1,592   480   7,479   269   12,886 
Acquisitions or additions from independent development  -   187   -   -   11   198 
Disposals  -   -   -   -   (11)  (11)
                        
Balance as at December 31, 2016  3,066   1,779   480   7,479   269   13,073 
                        
Amortization and impairment losses                                                    
Balance as at January 1, 2014  -   3,384   42   641   109   219   4,395 
Amortization for the year  -   471   10   163   28   16   688 
Loss of control  -   -   (36)  -   -   -   (36)
                            
Balance as at December 31, 2014  -   3,855   16   804   137   235   5,047 
                            
Balance as at January 1, 2015  -   3,855   16   804   137   235   5,047   -   767   174   3,870   236   5,047 
Amortization for the year  -   447   22   242   31   20   762   -   242   31   469   20   762 
Disposals  -   -   -   -  -   (41)  (141)  -   -   -   -   (41)  (41)
                                                    
Balance as at December 31, 2015  -   4,302   38   1,046   168   214   5,768   -   1,009   205   4,339   215   5,768 
                                                    
Balance as at January 1, 2016  -   1,009   205   4,339   215   5,768 
Amortization for the year  -   229   37   487   24   777 
Disposals  -   -   -   -   (6)  (6)
                        
Balance as at December 31, 2016  -   1,238   242   4,826   233   6,539 
                        
Carrying amounts                                                    
As at January 1, 2014  2,825   1,779   1,268   496   241   4   6,613 
As at December 31, 2014  2,681   1,308   1,208   495   213   3   5,908 
As at January 1, 2015  2,681   498   210   2,517   2   5,908 
As at December 31, 2015  3,066   1,651   1,533   589   278   1   7,118   3,066   583   275   3,140   54   7,118 
As at December 31, 2016  3,066   541   238   2,653   36   6,534 

 F-42F-41 

 

 

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 9 - Intangible Assets (cont’d)

 

Total value of goodwill attributable to each cash-generating unit:

 

   December 31 
   2014  2015 
   NIS  NIS 
        
 Domestic fixed-line communications  1,283   1,548 
 Cellular telephone  1,205   1,205 
 Multi-channel television (DBS)  -   120 
 International communications and internet services  181   181 
 Others  12   12 
          
 Total  2,681   3,066 
   December 31 
   2015  2016 
   NIS  NIS 
        
 Domestic fixed-line communications  1,548   1,548 
 Cellular telephone  1,205   1,205 
 Multi-channel television (DBS)  120   120 
 International communications and internet services  181   181 
 Others  12   12 
          
 Total  3,066   3,066 

 

Goodwill impairment testing by the Company

Goodwill impairment testing by the Company

 

For the purpose of impairment testing, goodwill is allocated to the Company’sGroup’s cash generating units (“CGU”) which represent the lowest level within the CompanyGroup at which the goodwill is monitored for internal management purposes. Several goodwill balances result from the requirement to recognize a deferred tax liability on business combination, calculated as the difference between the tax effect of the fair value of the acquired assets and liabilities, and their tax bases. For the purpose of testing this goodwill for impairment, any of the related deferred tax liabilities recognized on acquisition that remain at the balance sheet date are treated as part of the carrying amount of the relevant CGU. The annual impairment test date is December 31.

 

The recoverable amount of each CGU was calculated as its value in use which was based on the Discounted Cash Flow method under the Income Approach. Value in use of the traditional voice and broadband CGUs was determined by discounting the future cash flows generated from the continuing use of the CGUs and was based on the following key assumptions:

 

Domestic fixed-line communications (Bezeq Fixed Line) -

 

The value in use for the Group’s domestic fixed line CGU was calculated using the future discounted cash flow method, based on the expected cash flow for the next five years. The expected cash flow is based on results of the domestic fixed-line communications segment in recent years, taking into account the effect of opening up the wholesale market in 2015.2016. The revenue forecast is based on assumptions about the number of users and average revenue per user of internet infrastructure, the number of users and average revenue per user of telephony services, and revenue from transmission, data communication and other revenue. The main assumption underlying the forecast is that the wholesale market will function properly and will provide effective competition to the infrastructure owners. In addition, the effect of the elimination of the structural separation on the domestic fixed-line communication segment was not taken into account.

 

The operating, sales, marketing and investment expenses were adjusted for domestic-fixed line communication operations. The price of nominal capital used is 7.5% (after tax). In addition, it was assumed that the permanent growth will be 1%. The valuation was madeconducted by an independent appraiser. Based on this valuation, the Groupthere was not required to recordno impairment of athe fixed line domestic communications cash-generating unit.

 

 F-43F-42 

 

 

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

 

Note 9 - Intangible Assets (cont’d)

 

Cellular telephone (Pelephone) -

 

The value in use for the Group’s cellular CGU (Pelephone) was calculated using the future discounted cash flow method, based on the expected cash flow for the next five years. The expected cash flow is based on Pelephone’s results in recent years, such that future growth and market shares are affected by directions in the cellular market, such as price competition, regulation and the scope of operations of the new cellular operators. The revenue forecast is based on assumptions regarding the number of users, average revenue per user, and sales of terminal equipment. The main assumption underlying the forecast is the recovery in Pelephone'sPelephone’s business activity as from 2017,2018, due to the expected stabilization of the market and the start of competitive balance. In addition, the valuation included expected synergies on the Group revenue level based on the high certainty of the structural separation in the long term.

 

The operating, sales, marketing and investment expenses were adjusted for Pelephone'sPelephone’s volume of operations. The cost of nominal capital used is 10% (after tax). In addition, it was assumed that the permanent growth will be 2.5%. The valuation was made by an independent appraiser. Based on this valuation, the Group was not required to record impairment of athe cellular communication cash-generating unit.

 

Multi-channel television (DBS) -

 

The value in use for theBezeq Group’s multichannel television CGUcash-generating unit (DBS) was calculated using the discounted cash flow (DCF) method, based on the expected cash flow for the next five years. The expected cash flow is based on the results of DBS in recent years, such that future growth and market shares are affected by directions in the multichannel television market, such as competition, regulation, and the entry of new players. The revenue forecast is based on assumptions regarding the number of users and average revenue per user. The main assumption underlying the forecast is erosionthe relative stability in market sharethe number of subscribers and a decrease in average revenue per user due toas from the expected increase in competition in the coming years.second half of 2018.

 

The operating, sales, marketing and investment expenses were adjusted for the volume of operations of DBS. The price of nominal capital used is 8.5% (after tax). In addition, it was assumed that the permanent growth of Pelephone will be 1%. The valuation was made by an independent appraiser. Based on this valuation, the Group was not required to record amortization for impairment of athe multichannel television cash-generating unit.

 

International communications andInternetand Internet services (Bezeq International) -

 

The value in use for the Group’s Internationalinternational communications and Internet services CGU was calculated using the discounted cash flow method, based on the expected cash flow for the next five years. The expected cash flow is based on the results of Bezeq International in recent years, such that future growth and market shares are affected by directions both in the Internationalinternational communications and Internet services markets, such as competition, regulation, and the wholesale market. The revenue forecast is based on assumptions regarding the number of users and average revenue per user. The main assumption underlying the forecast is erosion in market share and a decrease in average revenue per line (“APRL”) due to the expected increase in competition in the coming years as a result of the wholesale market in the Internet services business line along with the decrease in the revenues of International communications business as a result of increased use of cellular phones and other communication solutions.

 

 F-44F-43 

 

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

 

Note 9 - Intangible Assets (cont’d)

In addition, the revenue forecast is based on assumptions of an increase in wholesale revenues along with an increase in revenues from value added services.

 

The operating, sales, marketing and investment expenses were adjusted for the volume of operations of Bezeq International. The price of nominal capital used is 11%10% (after tax). In addition, it was assumed that the permanent growth will be 1%1.5%. The valuation was made by an independent appraiser. Based on this valuation, the Group was not required to record impairment of the Internationalinternational communications and Internet services cash-generating unit.

 

Note 10 - Deferred Expenses and Non-Current Investments

 

   December 31 
   2014  2015 
   NIS  NIS 
 Deferred expenses (A)  364   358 
 Non-current investments (B)  271   285 
          
    635   643 
   December 31 
   2015  2016 
   NIS  NIS 
        
 Deferred expenses (A)  358   337 
 Non-current investments (B)  285   110 
          
    643   447 

 

A.Deferred expenses include prepaid expense amounts for acquisition of an indefeasible right of use (IRU) of seabed cable capacities. The prepaid expense is amortized on a straight-line basis up to 2022 and 2027 according to the period set out in the agreements.
B.Non-current investments include a bank deposit for loans to Bezeq'sBezeq’s employees with a redemption date that has yet to be determined, a deposit for hedge transactions and the fair value of the Company’s cross currency swap transactions.

Note 11 -Broadcast Rights, Net of Rights Exercised

 

   December 31 
   2014  2015 
   NIS  NIS 
 Cost  -   621 
 Less rights exercised  -   (165)
          
 Total  -   456 
   December 31 
   2015  2016 
   NIS  NIS 
        
 Cost  621   800 
 Less rights exercised  (165)  (368)
          
 Total  456   432 

 

As at December 31, 2015,2016, DBS has agreements for the acquisition of broadcast rights. In 2015,2016, acquisition of these broadcast rights amounted to NIS 189.186.

F-44

  

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 12 - Investees

 

A.Material subsidiaries held directly and indirectly by the Company

 

1.General

 

  Principal   
  location of the   
  company'scompany’s Ownership 
  activity interest 
B Communications (SP1) Ltd. and B Communications (SP2) Ltd.(1) Israel  100%
Bezeq - The Israel Telecommunication Corp. Limited Israel  30.5626.34%
       
Subsidiaries of Bezeq - The Israel Telecommunication Corp. Limited      
Pelephone Communications Ltd. Israel  100%
Bezeq International Ltd. Israel  100%
DBS Israel  100%
Walla! Communications Ltd. Israel  100%

 

(1)Held by B Communications (SP1) Ltd.

 

2.Details of Group entities

 

a.a.B Communications (SP1) Ltd. and B Communications (SP2) Ltd.

B Communications (SP1) Ltd. ("SP1"(“SP1”), founded in 2010, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. SP1 is the sole shareholder of B Communications (SP2) Ltd. ("SP2"(“SP2”) which directly holds the Bezeq controlling interest.

 F-45b.

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 12Bezeq - Investees (cont’d) 

b.Bezeq- The Israel Telecommunications Corp.Corporation Ltd.

Bezeq is controlled by SP2 which holds 30.03%25.82% of Bezeq’s outstanding shares. An additional 0.53%0.52% of Bezeq outstanding shares are held by B Communications. Bezeq is the largest communications group in Israel.

 

c.c.Pelephone Communications Ltd.

Pelephone Communications Ltd. ("Pelephone"(“Pelephone”) is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Bezeq. Pelephone provides cellular communication services and value added services and markets terminal equipment.

 

d.d.Bezeq International Ltd.

Bezeq International Ltd. ("(“Bezeq International"International”) is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Bezeq. Bezeq International provides internet access (ISP) services, international communications services and network end point (NEP) services.

 

e.e.DBS Satellite Services (1998) Ltd.

DBS Satellite Services (1998) Ltd. ("DBS"(“DBS”) is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Bezeq. DBS provides multi-channel television services.

 

f.f.Walla! Communications Ltd.

Walla! is wholly owned by Bezeq. Walla! provides internet, management and media services for a range of populations.

��

F-45

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 12 - Investees (cont’d)

 

A.Material subsidiaries held directly and indirectly by the Company (cont'd)(cont’d)

 

3.Dividend paid by Bezeq to non-controlling interests during 20152016 was in the amount of NIS 1,2321,062 (in 2014:2015: NIS 1,431)1,232).

 

 4.4.Bezeq’s Dividend Distribution Policy

 

In August 2009, Bezeq’s Board of Directors resolved to implement a dividend policy to distribute 100% of the semi-annual profit ("(“profit for the period attributable to the shareholders of Bezeq"Bezeq”) in accordance with its consolidated financial statements as a dividend to its shareholders. Application of the policy to distribute a dividend is subject to the provisions of the law, including the distribution criteria prescribed in the Companies Law, and the estimation of the Board of Directors of Bezeq regarding its ability to meet its existing and anticipated liabilities, taking into consideration the projected cash flow, its operations and liabilities, the cash balance, its plans and position as will be from time to time and subject to the approval of the its general meeting of shareholders regarding any specific distribution, as set out in the articles of association of Bezeq. Since the date of the resolution, Bezeq’s dividend policy has not changed.

 

Following Bezeq’s Board of Director'sDirector’s resolution on February 10, 2015 regarding its engagement with Eurocom DBS for the acquisition of the full holdings of Eurocom DBS in DBS, Bezeq’s Board of Directors determined that the revaluation gains, which were expected to arise in accordance with accounting principles, will be excluded from the dividend policy and will not be distributed as a dividend. These gains amounted to NIS 12.

 

In 20142015 and 2015,2016, Bezeq declared and paid the following dividends in cash:

   2014  2015 
   NIS  NIS 
 Distribution of a regular dividend (see section B4 above)      
 2015 (NIS 0.65 per share)  -   1,777 
 2014 (NIS 0.76 per share)  2,069   - 
          
    2,069   1,777 
   2015  2016 
   NIS  NIS 
 Distribution of a regular dividend (see section B4 above)      
 2016 (NIS 0.52 per share)  -   1,441 
 2015 (NIS 0.65 per share)  1,777   - 
          
    1,777   1,441 

 

B.Business combination with DBS Satellite Services (1998) Ltd. ("DBS"(“DBS”) that occurred in the period

 

1.As at December 31, 2014,March 25, 2015, Bezeq held 49.78% of the share capital of DBS and it held options that conferred the right to acquire 8.6% of DBS’s shares, which Bezeq was unable to exercise. Accordingly,Eurocom DBS Ltd. held the balance of DBS shares. On March 25, 2015, Bezeq accountedexercised the options for its investmentno consideration and on June 24, 2016, Bezeq completed a transaction (“the Acquisition Transaction”) for the acquisition of the entire holdings of Eurocom DBS in DBS, in accordance withwhich at that date represented 50.22% of the equity method.issued share capital of DBS (41.62% fully diluted) and all the shareholder loans provided by Eurocom to DBS. On completion of the Acquisition Transaction, DBS became a wholly owned subsidiary (100%) of Bezeq.

Bezeq consolidates the financial statements of DBS as from March 23, 2015. The statements of income for 2014 and the first quarter of 2015 include the operating results of DBS based on the equity method.

 

 F-46 

 

 

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 12 - Investees (cont’d)

B.Business combination with DBS Satellite Services (1998) Ltd. ("DBS") that occurred in the period (cont’d)

On March 26, 2014, Bezeq received the decision of the Antitrust Authority, according to which, under the terms set out in the decision, the merger between Bezeq and DBS ("the Merger") would be permitted.

On February 10, 2015, a subcommittee of Bezeq’s Board of Directors' that was established for this matter, Bezeq's audit committee and Bezeq's Board of Directors approved Bezeq's entry into a transaction with Eurocom DBS. In the transaction, Bezeq agreed to acquire the entire holdings of Eurocom DBS in DBS ("the Acquisition Transaction"), which represented 50.22% of the issued share capital of DBS (41.62% fully diluted) and all the shareholder loans provided by Eurocom to DBS. It was further decided that prior to the Acquisition Transaction, Bezeq would exercise the option granted, at no cost, for the allotment of 8.6% of the issued capital of DBS.

Under the terms of the Acquisition Transaction, Bezeq was required to pay Eurocom DBS NIS 680 in cash on the closing date, against acquisition of the shares and shareholder loans held by Eurocom DBS. Under the terms of the Acquisition Transaction Eurocom DBS will also be entitled to two contingent payments, as follows: a contingent payment of up to NIS 200 will be paid in accordance with the amount of the carryforward losses of DBS used for tax purposes and a second contingent payment of up to NIS 170 will be paid in accordance with the business results of DBS in three years following the closing.

On March 23, 2015, the general meeting of Bezeq's shareholders approved the merger terms and the exercise the option, and Bezeq's entry into the Acquisition Transaction, as described above. Subsequently, Bezeq and DBS announced the acceptance of the merger terms, and on March 25, 2015, Bezeq exercised the option to acquire 8.6% of the issued capital of resulting in Bezeq holding 58.4% of the issued capital of DBS. Accordingly, Bezeq has consolidated the financial statements of DBS as of March 23, 2015 (the date that the general meeting of Bezeq approved the exercise of the option to acquire DBS shares). In view of the Bezeq's holding of 49.78% of DBS shares prior to gaining control, the acquisition transaction was accounted for in the financial statements as a step acquisition.

Bezeq's agreement with Eurocom DBS for the acquisition of the entire holdings of Eurocom DBS in DBS was subject to the approval of the Ministry of Communications. This approval was received unconditionally on June 23, 2015, and on June 24, 2015, the transaction was completed. On the completion date, Bezeq transferred the cash consideration of NIS 680 to Eurocom DBS and Eurocom DBS transferred its DBS shares to Bezeq and assigned to Bezeq its entire rights in the shareholders loans of DBS. On completion of the transaction, DBS became a wholly owned subsidiary (100%) of Bezeq.

As at December 31, 2015, Bezeq has a liability to Eurocom DBS for the first contingent payment of NIS 204 (including accrued interest) and NIS 29 for the second contingent payment.

F-47

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

 

Note 12 - Investees (cont’d)

 

B.Business combination with DBS Satellite Services (1998) Ltd. ("DBS"(“DBS”) that occurred in the period (cont’d)

In accordance with the Assessment Agreement and taxation decision of the Tax Authority (as set out in Note 19), on September 27, 2016, the shareholder loans amounting to NIS 5.319 billion (including shareholder loans acquired from Eurocom DBS) that were provided to DBS through June 23, 2016, were converted to equity and recognized in the financial statements of DBS as a premium on shares.

Under the terms of the Acquisition Transaction, in addition to the cash consideration of NIS 680, the consideration included two additional contingent payments, as follows: one additional payment of up to NIS 200, which was to be paid in accordance with the amount of the carry-forward losses of DBS used for tax purposes (“the First Contingent Consideration”); and another additional payment of up to NIS 170, which was to be paid in accordance with the business results of DBS in the 2015-2017 period (“the Second Contingent Consideration”).

In September 2016, Bezeq paid Eurocom DBS NIS 188 (plus interest differences of NIS 10) for the First Contingent Consideration, under the Assessment Agreement and taxation decision of the Tax Authority as set out in Note 19. The consideration paid is for the agreement with the Tax Authority with respect to the losses of DBS as at December 31, 2013. Following the decision regarding the additional and final losses as at December 31, 2014, the additional amount due to Eurocom DBS will be calculated and paid, and the unpaid amount will continue to bear interest in accordance with the acquisition agreement up to the payment date. As at December 31, 2016, the balance of the liability to Eurocom for the First Contingent Consideration is NIS 6.

The liability for the Second Contingent Consideration was paid in two payments of NIS 57 each, one in 2016 and the other in 2017. These payments were not recognized as an expense.

The liability for the Second Contingent Consideration was adjusted in the reporting year according to the management’s estimate, to NIS 84 and the increase of NIS 55 was recognized in financing expenses.

If the DBS merger is completed in 2017, the amount of this liability is expected to amount to the full amount of the Second Contingent Consideration, and if the merger is completed after the end of 2017, the amount of the liability will be contingent on the results of DBS for 2017. As at the reporting date, this amount may be less than the amount of the liability included in the financial statements.

 

2.PriorFollowing the announcement of the Director of the Ministry of Communications on December 21, 2016, regarding “Cancellation of the structural separation obligation in Bezeq Group”,(as described below), on December 25, 2016, Bezeq and DBS signed a merger agreement (“the Merger Agreement”), which, subject to the acquisitionpreconditions set out in the agreement, at the completion date of control,the merger, and effective retroactively from the effective date for the merger (December 31, 2016), all activities of DBS will be merged with and into Bezeq, presented its investmentfor no consideration, in shares, share options and loans to DBS, according to their fair value based on a valuation by an independent assessor. In accordance with the valuation,provisions of section 323 of the valueCompanies Law and the provisions of Bezeq's investments priorsection 103B and section 103C of the Income Tax Ordinance (as described in Note 19), and DBS will cease to acquisitionexist as a separate legal entity, will be wound up without liquidation and the Registrar of control was estimated at NIS 1.076 billion. Accordingly, Bezeq recognized a profit of NIS 12Companies will delete it from the gaining control under other operating income in the income statement.

The valuation was based on the income approach, whereby the discounted cash flow method was applied on the basis of the forecasted cash flow for 2015 through to 2019. The cash flow forecast was based on DBS’ results for 2011-2014 and the three months ended March 31, 2015. In the valuation, it was assumed that the market share of DBS was expected to remain stable and would be 42%-43% throughout the years of the forecast. It was also assumed that gradual erosion in the Average Revenue Per User (“ARPU”) of DBS was expected between 2015 and 2018, while in 2019 and thereafter, it was expected that a fixed nominal ARPU would be maintained. The revenue forecast was based on the forecast of the number of subscribers, average income and competition in the market.

Assumed cost of capital: 8.5% (net of tax). In addition, it was assumed that the permanent growth would be 1%.

The valuation was based on assumptions regarding the identity of the relevant market participant that might acquire Bezeq's holdings in DBS and does not take into account the specific operational and tax synergies between the companies.

3.Identifiable acquired assets and liabilities

March 23,
2015
NIS
Cash and cash equivalents299
Trade and other receivables182
Broadcast rights449
Property, plant and equipment801
Deferred tax asset, net of deferred tax liabilities (for attributed excess cost)1,170
Intangible assets (including excess cost attributed to customer relations and brand as described below)1,284
Debentures, loans, and borrowings (including excess cost attributed to debentures as described below)(1,946)
Trade payables and other liabilities(632)
Contingent liabilities (including excess cost attributed to contingent liabilities as described below)(19)
Identifiable assets, net1,588Register.

 

 F-48F-47 

 

 

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

 

Note 12 - Investees (cont'd)(cont’d)

 

B.Business combination with DBS Satellite Services (1998) Ltd. ("DBS"(“DBS”) that occurred in the period (cont’d)

 

4.Bezeq attributed the acquisition cost in relation to the fair value of the assets and liabilities that were acquired in the business combination. The attribution was based on the valuation performed by an independent assessor whose opinion is attached to these financial statements.

Excess cost was as follows:

March 23, 2015
NIS
Customer relations (see section a below)790
Brand (see section b below)347
Goodwill (see section c below)385
Deferred tax asset, net of deferred tax liabilities (see d below)1,170
Debentures (see section e below)(160)
Contingent liabilities (see section f below)(10)
Total excess cost2,522

a.Customer relations: The valuation was based on the income approach, using the multi-period excess earning method. Under this approach, the value of the asset is derived from the present value of the cash flows that are expected to arise from it over the remaining economic life of the asset. Amortization will be based on the existing customer churn rate.
b.Brand value: The valuation was prepared in accordance with the relief from royalty method. In accordance with this method, the value of the asset is estimated as the present value of the appropriate royalty that the entity would have to pay a third party for the use of the asset, if the company did not own it. The useful life of the brand assumed in the model is 12 years.
c.Goodwill:Following the acquisition of control, goodwill was recognized as follows:

March 23, 2015
NIS
Consideration value897
Fair value of the investment in DBS prior to the acquisition1,076
Less the fair value of net identifiable assets(1,588)
Goodwill385

F-49

B Communications Ltd.Completion of the merger is subject to the fulfillment of the preconditions in the merger agreement.

 

Notes toIt is noted that in accordance with the Consolidated Financial Statementsannouncement of the Ministry of Communications, in the first stage, the Ministry is advancing the elimination of the corporate separation in Bezeq Group, in such a way that the operations of Bezeq’s subsidiaries will be under a corporate structure of one company, but with a separation of divisions among the different operations, so that at this stage, the rules of the arrangement set out in Bezeq’s license will be maintained for structural separation in competitive aspects among the different activities.

 

(All amounts areAfter signing the merger agreement, the shareholders’ loans registered in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 12 - Investees (cont'd)

the name of Bezeq in the financial statements of DBS, the balance of which, including principal and accrued interest as at December 27, 2016 amounted to NIS 389, were converted to equity, and Bezeq made an additional investment in DBS against a premium of NIS 130 (which was paid in cash on January 1, 2017).

B.3.Business combination with DBS Satellite Services (1998) Ltd. ("DBS") that occurred inFollowing the period (cont’d)

To assess impairment, goodwillconversion of NIS 265 was allocated to the domestic-fixed line communications segment, and goodwill of NIS 120 was allocated to the multichannel television segment. Goodwill is allocated on the basis of the valuation of an external assessor and the Company's estimates regarding the cash-generating units that are expected to benefit from the synergy of the business combination.

d.Deferred tax asset: Following completion of the acquisition transaction on June 24, 2015, as described in Note 19G, Bezeq believes that will be able to take advantage of the tax asset for the accrued losses from future profits of DBS and due to the possible merger between the companies.

Bezeq accounted for completion of the acquisition transaction after gaining control as new information obtained in the measurement period for the facts and circumstances that existed at the acquisition date and, therefore, as at December 31, 2015, Bezeq recognized a deferred tax asset at the date control was acquired and updated the liability for the first contingent consideration accordingly (retrospectively).

Composition of the tax asset:

March 23, 2015
NIS
Tax asset for cumulative losses of DBS1,426
Tax reserve for attributed excess cost(256)
Deferred tax asset, net1,170

e.Debentures:The excess cost reflects the fair value of the debentures at the acquisition date based on a capitalization rate of 1.9%-2.3%.
f.Contingent liabilities: Amounts that represents a present obligation arising from a class action filed by DBS customers.

5.The contribution of DBS to Group revenue in 2015 amounted to NIS 1,333 and its contribution to profit as from the date of the business combination amounted to NIS 49 (this amount includes amortization of surplus cost amounting to NIS 43).
6.Bezeq's management estimates that had the business combination taken place on January 1, 2015, the revenue in the consolidated statement of income would have increased by NIS 434 and there would have been no significant change in the consolidated profit for the period. When determining the amounts, Bezeq's management assumed that the fair value adjustments at the date of the business combination are the same as the adjustments that would have been received had the business combination taken place on January 1, 2015.

F-50

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 12 - Investees (cont'd)

B.Business combination with DBS Satellite Services (1998) Ltd. ("DBS") that occurred in the period (cont’d)

7.Bezeq provided shareholder loans to DBS between 1999 and 2005. In addition, at the acquisition date of the rights of Eurocominvestment in DBS in June 2015,capital as describedset out above, Bezeq acquired the shareholders loan provided by Eurocom to DBS. The total amount of the shareholder loans in accordance with the contractual terms and fair value as at December 31, 2015 (including interest and linkage differences) is NIS 5.1 billion and NIS 1.4 billion, respectively.
8.For2016, the purposeequity of rating the Debentures (Series A) issued by DBS with a balance of NIS 368 million as at December 31, 2015 (as described in Note 13C below), in 2007, DBS undertook to S&P Maalot that it would not make any repayment on account of the shareholder loans provided to from the date of the undertaking, until the end of the term of the Debentures in July 2017.

On December 2015, Bezeq provided another shareholder loan to DBS, amounting to NIS 323, as described in Note 13C below.

9.Since the beginning of its operations, DBS has accumulated considerable losses. The losses of DBS in 2015 and 2014 amounted to NIS 354 and NIS 322, respectively. As592, against a result of these losses, as at December 31, 2015, DBS had a shareholder’s equity deficit and a working capital deficit of NIS 5,018 andat the end of 2015. Notwithstanding its improved financial position, as at December 31, 2016, the working capital deficit of DBS amounts to NIS 584, respectively.510.

 

The management of DBS believes that the financial resources at its disposal, which include the receipt of loans from Bezeq, will be sufficient for its operations for the coming year, based on the cash flow forecast approved by DBS’s board of directors.

 

C.Bezeq distributable earnings

 

On March 16, 201629, 2017 the Board of Directors of Bezeq resolved to recommend to the general meeting of shareholders the distribution of a cash dividend in the amount of NIS 776.578. As at the approval date of the financial statements, the dividend has not yet been approved by the general meeting. Subsequent to this distribution, Bezeq will have a negative retained earnings balance and under the Companies Law its future distributions will be based on its future earnings. For Bezeq’s dividend distribution Policy, see note 12A4 above, for covenants and liens, see note 13.

 

 F-51F-48 

 

 

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

 

Note 12 - Investees (cont’d)

 

 D.Non-controlling interests in subsidiaries

 

The table hereunder presents summary information of the Group’s subsidiaries including fair value adjustments that were made on the date of acquisition, other than goodwill, in which there are non-controlling interests that are material to the Group.

 

  December 31, Year ended December 31,
                          Total     Cash flow    
  Rate of                       compre- hensive     fromfinancing    
  ownership                     Profit Income     activities   Total
  interests           Carrying         (loss) (loss) Cash  Cash  without Dividend increase
  held by           amount of     Other Total attributable attributable flow flow dividend paid to (decrease)
  non-   Non-   Non- Total non-     compre- compre- to non- to non- from from to non- non- in cash
  controlling Current current Current current net controlling     hensive hensive controlling controlling operating investing controlling controlling and cash
  interests assets assets liabilities liabilities assets interests Revenues Profit income income interests interests activities activities interests interests equivalents
     %  NIS
 2015                                                                         
                                                                           
 Bezeq Group   69.44   3,771   14,426   4,905   10,041   3,251   2,346   9,985   1,336   7   1,343   926   931   3,740   283   (2,896)  (1,232)  (105)
                                                                           
 2014                                                                         
                                                                           
 Bezeq Group   69.24   5,496   11,890   3,795   9,913   3,678   2,627   9,055   1,667   (36)  1,631   1,152   1,127   3,796   (1,546)  (769)  (1,431)  50 
                                                                           
 2013                                                                         
                                                                           
 Bezeq Group   69.09   5,071   12,657   3,487   10,136   4,105   2,917   9,563   1,162   6   1,168   802   806   4,152   (917)  (1,137)  (1,954)  144 
   December 31,  Year ended December 31, 
                                                Cash flow       
                                       Total        from       
   Rate of                                   comprehensive        financing       
   ownership                                Profit  Income        activities     Total 
   interests                 Carrying              (loss)  (loss)  Cash  Cash   without  Dividend  increase 
   held by                 amount of              attributable  attributable  flow  flow  dividend to  paid to  (decrease) 
   non-     Non-     Non-  Total   non-        Other  Total  to non-  to non-  from  from  non-  non-  in cash 
   controlling  Current  current  Current  current  net  controlling        comprehensive  comprehensive  controlling  controlling  operating  investing  controlling  controlling  and cash 
   interests  assets  assets  liabilities  liabilities  assets  interests  Revenues  Profit  income  income  interests  interests  activities  activities  interests  interests  equivalents 
   %  NIS 
2016                                                       
                                                        
 Bezeq Group   73.66   3,559   13,083   3,966   10,270   2,406   2,131   10,084   989   (15)  974   724   713   3,526   (1,567)  (804)  (1,062)  93 
                                                                           
 2015                                                                         
                                                                           
 Bezeq Group   69.44   3,771   14,426   4,905   10,041   3,251   2,346   9,985   1,336   7   1,343   926   931   3,740   283   (2,896)  (1,232)  (105)
                                                                           
 2014                                                                         
                                                                           
 Bezeq Group   69.24   5,496   11,890   3,795   9,913   3,678   2,627   9,055   1,667   (36)  1,631   1,152   1,127   3,796   (1,546)  (769)  (1,431)  50 

 

 F-52F-49 

 

 

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

 

Note 12 - Investees (cont’d)

 

E.Increasing Competition and Reducing Concentration, 2013 law

 

In December 2013, the Knesset passed the Israeli Law for Increasing Competition and Reducing Concentration, 2013 ("(“Concentration Law"Law”), which: (i) imposes limitations on the control over companies with publicly held debt or equity securities through a pyramidal ownership structure by imposing a limitation on the number of public companies (tiers) in such pyramidal structure; (ii) authorizes financial regulators to set forth limitations on the amount of credit that financial institutions are permitted to provide to a corporation or a group of companies under the control of the same controlling shareholder; (iii) imposes limitations on the holdings by a significant non-finance company in a significant finance company or the holdings of both kinds of companies under common control; and (iv) requires governmental authorities responsible for the award of rights in public assets (including in the communications field) in certain cases to consider control concentration factors and industry-specific competitive factors.

 

Internet Gold is deemed to be a “first tier” company, the Company is deemed to be a “second tier” company and Bezeq is deemed to be a "third-tier"“third-tier” company under the Concentration Law. Accordingly, if either Internet Gold or the Company are unable to redeem any of their publicly held debt and delist their ordinary shares from the TASE (which would require 90-days’ prior notice to the TASE) or go private prior to December 10, 2019, the Company will not be permitted to control Bezeq after such date and its holdings in Bezeq may be transferred to a trustee for the purpose of selling such holdings.

 

The Concentration Law sets forth certain mechanisms intended to enable a tier company, which is subject to the prohibition of controlling another tier company, to make various arrangements for the repurchase of its publicly-held shares and the early redemption of publicly-held debt in order to comply with the provisions of the law. These mechanisms enable the repurchase of publicly-held shares and the early redemption of publicly-held debt securities under a Court-approved scheme of arrangement pursuant to the Israeli Companies Law, at fair value and in accordance with the conditions prescribed by the Concentration Law, while providing certain relief from shareholders or debenture holder majority requirements for the approval of the arrangement. Furthermore, if a trustee is appointed, he may seek a district court to order the cancellation of distributions made by Bezeq prior to his appointment if they are deemed not be in Bezeq’s interest. In addition, beginning six months after the publication of the Concentration Law and during a six years transition period, the board of directors of a company that is a “third-tier” company (such as Bezeq) must be comprised of a majority of “independent directors,” within the meaning of the Israeli Companies Law, and the number of “external directors” pursuant to the Israeli Companies Law shall be at least half the number of the company’s directors less one (rounded upwards) but not less than two. The election of such external directors will be by a majority vote of the shareholders and the controlling shareholder’s vote will not be counted for such purpose. The Israeli Minister of Justice is authorized to enact regulations setting forth a lower number of required external directors, provided that such number will not be lower than one-third of the board members.

 

The Company estimates that the application of the Concentration Law will not affect its controlling shareholder'sshareholder’s vote position in Bezeq.

 

 F-53F-50 

 

 

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

 

Note 12 - Investees (cont’d)

 

F.The Company's de factoCompany’s control over Bezeq

 

The Company has de facto control over Bezeq based on the facts that it holds significantly more voting rights than any other shareholder. Bezeq’s other shareholders are widely dispersed and are not allowed to increase their holdings above 5% without regulatory approval, appoint a director or the chief executive officer of Bezeq nor have any influence on Bezeq’s day-to-day operational decision making policies. In addition the Israeli law and regulations were formulated in order to ensure that no individual or entity will interfere with the control of Bezeq by the holder of the Control Permit. These regulations enable the Company to de facto nominate the majority of the board of directors of Bezeq.

 

Note 13 - Debentures, Loans and Borrowings, including Obligations to Banks, Institutions and Others

 

 A.Composition

 

   December 31 
   2014  2015 
   NIS  NIS 
 Current liabilities      
 Current maturities of debentures  882   1,378 
 Current maturities of bank loans  619   711 
          
    1,501   2,089 
          
 Non-current liabilities        
 Debentures  9,202   9,782 
 Bank loans  3,155   2,508 
          
    12,357   12,290 
          
    13,858   14,379 
   December 31 
   2015  2016 
   NIS  NIS 
        
 Current liabilities      
 Current maturities of debentures  1,378   1,212 
 Current maturities of bank loans  711   839 
          
    2,089   2,051 
          
 Non-current liabilities        
 Debentures  9,782   8,362 
 Bank loans  2,508   3,084 
          
    12,290   11,446 
          
    14,379   13,497 

  

 F-54F-51 

 

 

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

 

Note 13 - Debentures, Loans and Borrowings, including Obligations to Banks, Institutions and Others (cont’d)

 

 B.Terms and debt repayment schedule

 

   December 31, 2014  December 31, 2015    Nominal
      Carrying     Carrying    interest
   Par value  amount  Par value  amount  Currency rate
   NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS    %
 Loans from banks and others:                
 Linked to the Israeli CPI - Fixed interest  18   22   -   -  NIS  
 Unlinked - Variable interest  1,656   1,656   1,331   1,331  NIS P-0.33 to P+0.2
 Unlinked - Fixed interest  2,096   2,096   1,889   1,889  NIS 2.20 to 6.85
    3,770   3,774   3,220   3,220     
                      
 Debentures:                    
 Linked to the Israeli CPI - fixed interest  3,435   3,870   4,622   5,085  NIS 3.70 to 8.40
 Linked to the US Dollar - fixed interest  3,111   3,053   3,017   2,966  US$ 7.375
 Unlinked - variable interest  734   734   734   734  NIS One year Makam + 1.4
 Unlinked - fixed interest  2,435   2,427   2,380   2,374  NIS 2.20 to 6.65
    9,715   10,084   10,753   11,159     
                      
 Total interest-bearing liabilities  13,485   13,858   13,973   14,379     
  December 31, 2015  December 31, 2016    Nominal
     Carrying     Carrying    interest
  Par value  amount  Par value  amount  Currency rate
  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS    %
                 
Loans from banks and others:                
Unlinked - Variable interest  1,331   1,331   978   978  NIS P-0.33 to P+0.2
Unlinked - Fixed interest  1,889   1,889   2,931   2,945  NIS 2.40 to 6.85
   3,220   3,220   3,909   3,923     
                     
Debentures:                    
Linked to the Israeli CPI - fixed interest  4,622   5,085   4,027   4,309  NIS 2.20 to 8.40
Linked to the US Dollar - fixed interest  3,017   2,966   -   -  US$ 7.375
Unlinked - variable interest  734   734   734   734  NIS Makam + 1.4
Unlinked - fixed interest  2,380   2,374   4,505   4,531  NIS 3.60 to 6.65
   10,753   11,159   9,266   9,574     
                     
Total interest-bearing liabilities  13,973   14,379   13,175   13,497     

 

Loans from banks and others and debentures

 

(1)On February 19, 2014, the Company issued $800 of Senior Secured Notes ("the Notes”) due 2021 that bear 7⅜% annual interest paid semi-annually.

The Notes were offered and sold in the United States to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to Rule 144A under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and to certain qualifying investors in offshore transactions, including in Israel, in reliance on Regulation S under the Securities Act. The Notes are senior obligations of the Company and are guaranteed by its two wholly-owned subsidiaries, SP1 and SP2, on a senior secured basis ("the Guarantees”). The Notes and the Guarantees are secured by first priority pledges over all of the capital stock of SP2, the capital stock of Bezeq held by SP2, and additional collateral. The Notes have been admitted for trading on the system of the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange for trading by institutional investors, known as TACT Institutional.

The Company used the net proceeds from the offering to repay all amounts outstanding under the loans received by SP2 and SP1 from Bank Hapoalim Ltd. (“Bank Hapoalim”), and Migdal Insurance and Financial Holdings Ltd. Group (“Migdal”) respectively and to deposit funds into a debt service account.

Under the terms of the indenture for the Notes (“ The Indenture”) funds maintained by SP2 must be deposited in one or more accounts designated as a lockbox account and pledged as collateral to the security agent for the benefit of the holders of the Notes. As of December 31, 2015 cash and cash equivalents and short term investments held in the lockbox account totalled NIS 535.

F-55

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 13 - Debentures, Loans and Borrowings, including Obligations to Banks, Institutions and Others (cont’d)

B.Debt terms and repayment schedule (cont’d)

On August 10, 2014 the Company’s Board of Directors approved the buyback of up to $50 million of the Notes. On January 20, 2016, after the balance sheet date, the Company completed its $50 million repurchase program and its Board of Directors approved to extend and increase the program by an additional $50 million. During 2015, the Company purchased $27 million par value of the Notes. From January 1, 2016 through April 18, 2016, the Company purchased an additional $38 million par value of the Notes.

Following the sale of 115,500,000 shares of Bezeq shares in February 2016, under the terms of the Indenture for the Notes, the NIS 982 of, net proceeds of the sale were deposited in the “Lockbox Account”. Under the terms of the Indenture, the Company must make an offer to the holders of the Notes within 365 days of receipt of the proceeds to purchase the maximum principal amount of Notes that may be purchased with such proceeds at a cash offer price equal to at least 100% of the principal amount of the Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of purchase.

As at December 31, 2015 the outstanding par value of the Notes was NIS 3,017.

(2)On April 14, 2010, SP2 received loans from certain banking and financial institutions led by Bank Hapoalim in the total principal amount of NIS 4.6 billion for the acquisition of the Bezeq shares.

Under the terms of the loan agreement covenants between SP2 and the Bank Hapoalim consortium, Bezeq was required to maintain certain minimum shareholders' equity and minimum ratio of shareholders' equity to the balance sheet and was required to exceed certain thresholds relating to the ratio of financial debt to EBITDA. In addition, a minimum ratio of debt to EBITDA in SP2 and debt service coverage ratio of SP2 was required to be maintained.

The Bezeq shares held by SP2 and all of SP2’s other rights and assets were pledged to the lenders as security of SP2’s obligations under the loan agreements with Bank Hapoalim. In addition, SP1 pledged to the lenders the entire equity it holds in SP2 and the debt owed to it by SP2.

SP2 undertook to maintain a minimum cash deposit of NIS 150 in an account held with Bank Hapoalim from the cash Bezeq pays and/or distributes to SP2.

On February 19, 2014, following the issuance of the Notes, the loan was repaid in full.

(3)On February 18, 2010, SP1 entered into a loan agreement with certain entities associated with Migdal. According to the Migdal loan agreement, on April 14, 2010, SP1 received a NIS 500 loan for the acquisition of the Bezeq shares. The loan provided for annual interest at a rate of 6.81% and was linked to Israeli CPI.

F-56

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 13 - Debentures, Loans and Borrowings, including Obligations to Banks, Institutions and Others (cont’d)

B.Debt terms and repayment schedule (cont’d)

The Migdal loan to SP1 was secured by a first ranking pledge on SP1’s rights in the bank account into which all payments from SP2 were made, except for certain defined expenses. SP1 undertook to maintain minimum funds of NIS 22.5 (linked to the Israeli CPI) in the pledged bank account. The Migdal facility agreement included limitations on distributions and payments from the pledged bank account (including conditions as to total debt to EBITDA ratios that relate to SP1).

On February 19, 2014, following the issuance of the Notes, the Migdal loan was repaid in full.

(4)During the period from March 2007 to May 2007, the Company issued a total of NIS 425 of 4.75% Series A Debentures. The Series A Debentures were linked to the Israeli. The principal of the Series A Debentures was payable in eight equal instalments on March 15 of each year starting from March 15, 2009. Series A Debentures interest was payable on March 15 of each year starting from the date of issuance.

On March 17, 2014, the Company completed an early redemption all of its outstanding Series A Debentures having a par value of NIS 153 for total consideration of NIS 203. As of that date the Series A Debentures were delisted from the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange.

(5)On September 21, 2010, the Company issued NIS 400 of its Series B Debentures at par value NIS 400 Series B Debentures to the public in Israel. In January 2012 and August 2013, the Company completed private placements of additional Series B Debentures in the amount of NIS 126 and NIS 180 par value, respectively, to certain Israeli institutional investors.

 

On March 31,April 1, 2016, after the balance sheet date, the Company completed a private placement of NIS 148 par value of its Series B Debentures to Israeli institutional investors for an aggregate consideration of NIS 162.

 

As at December 31, 20152016 the outstanding par value of the Series B Debentures was NIS 706.677.

 

The Series B Debentures are unlinked to the Israeli CPI,denominated in NIS, bear interest at a fixed annual rate of 6.5% which is payable semi-annually on March 31 and September 30 of each of the years 2011 through 2019 (the first interest payment was made on March 31, 2011 and the last interest payment is payable on March 31, 2019). The principal of the Series B Debentures principal is payable in four equal installments on March 31 of each year starting from 2016. Series B Debentures interest is payable on March 31 of each year starting from the date of issuance.

 

According to the financial covenants of the Series B Debentures the Company is obligated to the following:

 

1.Not issue any additional Series B Debentures if such increase will decrease the A2 rating of the Series B Debentures.

 

2.To maintain control of Bezeq.

 F-57F-52 

 

 

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

 

Note 13 - Debentures, Loans and Borrowings, including Obligations to Banks, Institutions and Others (cont’d)

 

 B.Debt terms and repayment schedule (cont’d)

 

2.To maintain control of Bezeq.

3.The investors will have the right to require the immediate repayment of the Series B debentures if Eurocom will no longer hold the controlling interest in the Company.

 

As at December 31, 2015,2016, the Company was in compliance with the financial covenants of the Series B debentures.Debentures.

 

(6)(2)Below are detailsOn February 19, 2014, the Company issued $800 of the termsSenior Secured Notes (the “Notes”) due 2021 that Bezeq undertook for the loans that were received and the debentures that were issued:bear 7⅜% annual interest paid semi-annually.

 

a.For Debentures (Series 5), standard grounds were established for immediate repayment, including breach events, insolvency, dissolution procedures or receivership.

The Notes were offered and sold in the United States to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to Rule 144A under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and to certain qualifying investors in offshore transactions, including in Israel, in reliance on Regulation S under the Securities Act. The Notes had senior obligations of the Company and were guaranteed by its two wholly-owned subsidiaries, SP1 and SP2, on a senior secured basis (“the Guarantees”). The Notes and the Guarantees were secured by first priority pledges over all of the capital stock of SP2, the capital stock of Bezeq held by SP2, and additional collateral. The Notes were admitted for trading on the system of the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange for trading by institutional investors, known as TACT Institutional.

 

b.For Debentures (Series 6 to 10) and bank loans and for debentures issued to financial institutions in the amount of NIS 400, Bezeq has undertaken not to create additional pledges on its assets unless pledges are created at the same time in favor of the debenture holders and the lending banks (negative pledge). The pledge includes exceptions, including regarding a pledges on assets that will be purchased or expanded by Bezeq, if the undertakings underlying the pledge are created for the purchase or expansion of those assets and for the matter of a token lien.

The Company used the net proceeds from the offering of the Notes to repay all amounts outstanding under the loans received by SP2 and SP1 from Bank Hapoalim Ltd. (“Bank Hapoalim”) and Migdal Insurance and Financial Holdings Ltd. Group (“Migdal”) that were used to purchase the controlling interest in Bezeq and to deposit funds into a debt service account.

 

c.For Debentures (Series 6 to 8) and bank loans and for debentures issued to financial institutions in the amount of NIS 400, standard grounds were included for immediate repayment of the debentures and loans, including breach events, insolvency, dissolution procedures or receivership. In addition, a right was determined to call for immediate repayment if a third party lender calls for immediate repayment of Bezeq's debts in an amount exceeding the amount determined.

Under the terms of the indenture for the Notes funds maintained by SP2 had to be deposited in one or more accounts designated as a lockbox account and pledged as collateral to the security agent for the benefit of the holders of the Notes.

 

d.For Debentures (Series 6 to 10) and banks loans in the amount of NIS 2.03 billion as at December 31, 2015 (out of the total bank loans in the amount of NIS 3.2 billion), and for debentures issued to financial institutions in the amount of NIS 400, Bezeq has undertaken that if it Bezeq makes an undertaking towards any entity in respect of compliance with financial covenants, Bezeq will also provide the same undertaking to these debenture holders and banks (subject to certain exceptions).

On August 10, 2014 the Company’s Board of Directors approved the buyback of up to $50 of the Notes. On January 20, 2016, the Company completed its $50 repurchase program and its Board of Directors approved the extension and increase of the program by an additional $50. During 2015 and 2016, the Company purchased $65 par value of the Notes.

 

e.For Debentures (Series 6 to 10), Bezeq has undertaken to the debenture holders to take steps so that, to the extent under its control, the debentures will be rated by at least one rating agency, so long as there are debentures of the relevant series in circulation.

On May 26, 2016 the Company announced that its wholly-owned subsidiary, B Communications (SP4) LP, had invited holders of the Notes to submit tenders to purchase their Notes for cash within a purchase price range of $1.00 to $1.07 per $1.00 nominal amount of Notes. The aggregate par value of the Notes tendered and purchased was approximately $18.6.

The total loss from the repurchase of the Notes during 2015 and 2016 amounted to NIS 33.

In September 2016, the Notes were fully repaid following the Company’s issuance of Series C Debentures, as detailed below in note 13B(3).

 

 F-58F-53 

 

 

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

 

Note 13 - Debentures, Loans and Borrowings, including Obligations to Banks, Institutions and Others (cont’d)

 

 B.Debt terms and repayment schedule (cont’d)

 

(3)On September 18, 2016, the Company issued, at par value, NIS 1.9 billion of Series C Debentures to the public in Israel. The principal of the Series C Debentures will be payable in four equal instalments payable on November 30 of each of the years 2020 through 2023 and one instalment payable on November 30, 2024. Each of the first four instalments will be equal to 7.5% of the principal amount of the aggregate amount of the Series C Debentures issued and the last instalment will equal to 70% of such principal amount. The annual coupon of the Series C Debentures is 3.6% and is denominated in NIS. The interest on the outstanding principal of the Series C Debentures is payable in semi-annual payments on May 31 and November 30 of each year.

The net proceeds from the offering together with cash and cash equivalents of the Company were used to fully redeem the outstanding Notes and to deposit the upcoming interest payment due in May 2017 into a trustee account solely for the benefit of the holders of the Series C Debentures.

As at December 31, 2016 the outstanding par value of Series C Debentures was NIS 1.9 billion.

As at December 31, 2016, the Company was in compliance with the financial covenants of the Series C debentures.

On January 16, 2017, subsequent to the balance sheet date, the Company completed a private placement of NIS 118 par value of its Series C Debentures to Israeli institutional investors for an aggregate consideration of NIS 118.

Below are the main undertakings and Covenants with respect to the Series C Debentures:

The Company undertook to refrain from creating in favor of any third party a lien of any ranking whatsoever over its direct and/or indirect holdings of 691,361,036 shares of Bezeq, including any of the rights accompanying such shares (hereinafter, the “Undertaken Shares”) without the prior consent of the holders of the Series C Debentures by a special resolution (hereinafter, “Negative Lien Undertaking”).

The Company further undertook to refrain from making any disposition of the Undertaken Shares without the prior consent of the holders of the Series C Debentures by a special resolution. Notwithstanding the foregoing, and subject to the provisions of applicable law and/or permit, the Company may sell all or a portion of the Undertaken Shares to any third party, provided that in such instance, the Company uses the net proceeds it receives from such sale, less the taxes, expenses and deductions entailed in the sale of such shares (hereinafter, the “Net Sale Proceeds”), to make full or partial early redemption, of the Series C Debentures (exclusively) in accordance with the provisions the Indenture.

F-54

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 13 - Debentures, Loans and Borrowings, including Obligations to Banks, Institutions and Others (cont’d)

B.Debt terms and repayment schedule (cont’d)

Restriction on assumption of additional debt:

The Company undertook to refrain from assuming additional debt, with the exception of:

a.Financial debt in an amount (principal) which does not exceed NIS 400;

b.The financial debt is not secured by any collateral and does not have priority over Series C Debentures in creditor ranking upon insolvency.

c.The total par value of the Series C Debentures together with the total principal amount of the additional debt together with the (principal) amount of the new debt which the Company intends to assume does not exceed an aggregate of NIS 2.3 billion.

Control of Bezeq

The Company undertook to hold (directly and/or indirectly) at least 25% of Bezeq’s issued and paid-up capital, unless a regulatory permit/approval is received to reduce such shareholding percentage.

Control in the Company

Eurocom Communications Ltd., undertook to refrain from transferring control of the Company (directly or indirectly) to a party which has not been authorized in advance by the necessary regulatory entities, to the extent such approvals are required, at the relevant time.

Minimum equity

The Company undertook that its equity (capital attributed to the Company’s shareholders, without non-controlling interests) (hereinafter, the “Equity”) according to its last consolidated financial statements published, shall not be less than NIS 650 for the duration of two or more consecutive calendar quarters. The indenture for the Series C Debentures includes a mechanism of adjustment of interest rate in the event of a drop below the Minimum Equity or in the event of a downgrade in the rating of the Series C Debentures.

F-55

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 13 - Debentures, Loans and Borrowings, including Obligations to Banks, Institutions and Others (cont’d)

B.Debt terms and repayment schedule (cont’d)

Restriction on distribution

The Company undertook not to distribute a dividend to its shareholders and/or perform a buyback of its shares and/or any other distribution as defined in the Companies Law unless all the conditions provided in subsections (a) through (f) below are satisfied:

a.The distribution will not cause a downgrade in the rating of the Series C Debentures.

b.The Company is not in violation of any of the covenants.

c.No grounds for immediate repayment exist at the time a resolution to make a distribution is adopted, and no such grounds exist as a result of such distribution.

d.The Company’s Equity post-distribution is not less than NIS 800.

e.Until full repayment of the principal of the Series C Debentures, the Company shall not distribute a dividend exceeding 75% of the balance of the Company’s distributable surpluses (the surplus balance or surpluses accrued in the last two years, in accordance with the definitions provided in the Companies Law) in accordance with its consolidated financial statements. In addition, the Company shall not make a distribution if it recorded an aggregate net loss in the last four quarters preceding the distribution date, on the basis of its last financial statements and/or the quarterly financial report published prior to the distribution date.

f.Notwithstanding the foregoing, the restrictions set forth in this subsection (f) shall not apply with respect to the balance of the Company’s profits/surpluses which are distributable in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Law, the Company’s financial statements as of June 30, 2016 (i.e. a total of NIS 416 which shall be excluded from the distribution restrictions under this subsection (f); for the avoidance of doubt, the restrictions provided in subsections (a) through (e) shall apply with respect to such distribution).

Ratio of unconsolidated equity to total unconsolidated balance sheet

Ratio of unconsolidated equity to total unconsolidated balance sheet: the Company’s equity shall not be less than 15% of the total balance sheet in accordance with the Company’s audited or reviewed (unconsolidated) financial statements (or, alternatively, the quarterly financial report figures, as elected by the Company), as the case may be, for two or more consecutive calendar quarters.

(4)Below are details of the terms that Bezeq undertook for the loans that it received and the debentures that were issued:

F-56

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 13 - Debentures, Loans and Borrowings, including Obligations to Banks, Institutions and Others (cont’d)

B.Debt terms and repayment schedule (cont’d)

a.For the Bezeq’s total debt, Bezeq has undertaken not to create additional liens on its assets unless liens are created at the same time in favor of the debenture holders and the lending banks (negative lien). The undertaking includes exceptions, including regarding a lien on assets that will be purchased or expanded by Bezeq, if the undertakings underlying the lien are created for the purchase or expansion of those assets and for the matter of a token lien.

b.For Debentures (Series 6 to 8), loans from banks and financial institutions, and for debentures from financial institutions, standard grounds were included for immediate repayment of the debentures and loans, including breach events, insolvency, dissolution procedures or receivership. In addition, a right was determined to call for immediate repayment if a third-party lender calls for immediate repayment of Bezeq’s debts in an amount exceeding the amount determined.

In addition, for loans from financial institutions amounting to NIS 500, a standard cause was included for immediate repayment of the loans, if telecommunication ceases to be the Bezeq Group’s core activity.

c.For Debentures (Series 6 to 10) and banks loans in the amount of NIS 2.8 billion as at December 31, 2016 (for loans from financial institutions amounting to NIS 500, and for debentures from financial institutions amounting to NIS 400, Bezeq has undertaken that if it Bezeq makes an undertaking towards any entity in respect of compliance with financial covenants, Bezeq will also provide the same undertaking to these debenture holders, banks and financial institutions (subject to certain exceptions). For Debentures (Series 6 to 10) and for loans from financial institutions amounting to NIS 500, Bezeq has undertaken to the lenders to take steps so that, to the extent under its control, the debentures will be rated by at least one rating agency, so long as there are debentures of the relevant series in circulation or a balance in loans, as the case may be.

d.In addition, for Debentures (Series 9 and 10), standard grounds were included for immediate repayment of the debentures, including events of default, insolvency, liquidation proceedings, or receivership, as well as the right to call for immediate repayment if a third party lender calls for immediate repayment of Bezeq 'sBezeq’s debts (in an amount exceeding NIS 150, if another series of marketable debentures is called for immediate repayment - an unlimited amount), in the event of the sale of more than 50% of the Bezeq Group'sGroup’s assets (consolidated) such that communicationstelecommunications will cease being the Bezeq Group'sGroup’s main activity, in the event of a change of control following which the current controlling shareholders in Bezeq will cease being controlling shareholders (other than transfer of control to a transferee that received approval to control Bezeq in accordance with the provisions of the Communications Law or change in control under other circumstances that were established), in the event that a going concern qualification is recorded in Bezeq 'sBezeq’s financial statements for two consecutive quarters, in the event of a material deterioration in Bezeq 'sBezeq’s business compared with the situation at the time of the issue, and there is real concern that Bezeq will not be able to repay the debentures on time (as set out in section 35I(1)(a)(1) in the Securities Law), all under the terms set out in the deed of trust of the debentures.

 

As at December 31, 2015 and the approval date of the financial statements, Bezeq was in compliance with all its liabilities, there were no grounds to call for immediate repayment, and financial covenants were not set out as described above.

C.Non-marketable debentures issued by DBS

DBS has two series of debentures with a balance of NIS 1,288 as at December 31, 2015. The debentures were issued to institutional investors and were listed on the TACT-Institutional system of the TASE. Below are details of the terms that DBS undertook in respect of the debentures:

a.Standard events were established (such as insolvency proceedings, default and exercise of pledges on most of the Company's assets), which, should they occur, after the warning periods that were established, will allow the right to call for immediate repayment of the debentures subject to the provisions in the deeds of trust, and the right to call for immediate payment if another debenture series issued by DBS is called for immediate repayment, if the balance for settlement exceeds the amount set out in the deed of trust (a right that was cancelled for Debentures (Series B), following a letter of guarantee provided by the Company as described in this section below).

 F-59F-57 

 

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

 

Note 13 - Debentures, Loans and Borrowings, including Obligations to Banks, Institutions and Others (cont’d)

 

 B.Debt terms and repayment schedule (cont’d)

As at December 31, 2016 and the approval date of the financial statements, Bezeq was in compliance with all its financial covenants.

C.Non-marketable debentures issued by DBS (cont’d)

 

a.DBS has Debentures (Series A) with a balance of NIS 190 as at December 31, 2016 and Debentures (Series B) with a balance of NIS 678 as at December 31, 2016, issued to institutional investors and listed on the TACT-Institutional system of the TASE.
b.In accordance with the deedDeed of trust for Debentures (Series A) (with a par value of NIS 305 as at December 31, 2015),Trust A, DBS created an unlimited floating first lien in favor of Trustee A on all of its assets (other than exemptions arising from the provisions of the Communications Law), including a stipulation that limits additional pledgesliens (subject to the exceptions set out in Deed of Trust A and the mortgage deed)exceptions), and (subject to exceptions in accordance with the Communications Law)an unlimited fixed first pledgeslien on the rights and assets of DBS (subject to exceptions under the Communications Law), including its rights under material agreements to which it is a party, its unissued registered capital, goodwill, certain intellectual property rights and insurance rights under its insurance policies.
c.Deed of Trust A and Deed of Trust B stipulate standard events (such as insolvency, default and exercise of liens on most of the assets of DBS and more), which, should they occur, after the warning period and terms set out in each deed of trust, will allow immediate call for repayment of the debentures under the provisions in the deed of trust, and establish the right to call for immediate payment if another debenture series of DBS is called for immediate repayment, if the balance for settlement exceeds the amount set out in the relevant deed of trust.
d.In September 2015, Bezeq signed a letter of guarantee for the undertakings of DBS in favor of the holders of Debentures (Series B), against a reduction of the interest rate for Debentures (Series B) and cancellation of collateral (similar to those registered in favor of Trustee A) and certain provisions in Deed of Trust B, all in accordance with the terms set out in Deed of Trust B.

 

Under Deed of Trust A DBS may register first pledges in favor of additional holders of debentures that it might issue and/or add them to pledges in favor of Trustee A, without the consent of Trustee A.

In September 2015, Bezeq signed a letter of guarantee for the undertakings of DBS to pay the entire balance of its debts of NIS 1.05 billion to holders of Debentures (Series B), (amounting to NIS 792 as at December 31, 2015) against a reduction of 0.5% in the annual interest rate for the debenture and cancellation of securities (which were similar to those registered in favor of Trustee A) and certain provisions of the deed of trust and the debenture (including the DBS's undertaking to comply with the financial covenants and restrictions on distribution of a dividend by DBS), all in accordance with the terms of the deed of trust of the debenture and the debenture. In accordance with the terms of the debenture, a reduction in the interest rate and cancellation of the collateral and certain provisions in the debenturesDeed of Trust B are contingent on the rating of Bezeq not falling below a rating of AA- by S&P Maalot or a corresponding rating ("(“the Minimum Rating"Rating”), a condition that was fulfilled as at the date of the guarantee.guarantee, and as at the date of the financial statements. If in the future, the rating of Bezeq falls below the Minimum Rating, then the reduction in the interest rate mustwill be cancelled, the collateral that was cancelled will be provided again, the provisions that were cancelled will be applicable again, and the guarantee will expire.

 

Up to December 2015, DBS was a party to another debenture series that was issued to several institutions ("the 2012 Debentures"). On December 20, 2015, DBS paid in full the unpaid balance of the 2012 Debentures in advance of the repayment date plus an early repayment fee of NIS 323 through a loan provided by Bezeq at that date.

 F-60F-58 

 

 

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

 

Note 13 - Debentures, Loans and Borrowings, including Obligations to Banks, Institutions and Others (cont’d)

 

 D.Undertakings to provide credit for 2016-2017

 

In 2015, Bezeq entered into agreements with banks and financial institutions, whereby Bezeq received an undertaking from these institutions to provide credit to Bezeq in a total amount of NIS 1.4 billion to refinance its future debt in 2016 (with an average duration of between 4.62017 amounting to 4.9 years and a fixed NIS interest rate of 3.7% to 4.3 %), and an undertaking to provide credit of NIS 600 in 2017900 (with an average duration of 4.5 years and an average fixed NIS interest rate of 4.3%).

 

The terms of all the undertakings and the loans to be provided thereunder include terms that are similar to the terms provided for other loans taken by Bezeq, including the following: an undertaking to refrain from creating additional pledges on Bezeq’s assets (with certain restrictions); an undertaking that if Bezeq assumes an undertaking towards a party in respect of compliance with financial covenants, Bezeq will also assume the same undertaking for

This this credit (subject to certain exceptions) has; and standard terms for immediate repayment (such as default events, insolvency, liquidation or receivership), and cross default (with certain restrictions), which will also apply, with the required changes, to the periods of the undertaking to provide credit.

 

In addition, some of the undertakings to provide credit in 2017 also include terms that are similar to the terms that were established for Bezeq’s Debentures (Series 9 and 10) as set out in Note 13B above.

Subsequent to the balance sheet date, Bezeq signed anotheran agreement to obtain a loan of NIS 300500 in 2017.

Other Obligations

On April 14, 2010, SP2 issued phantom stock options to banks and the financial institutions led by Bank Hapoalim, under which they received option units with respect to Bezeq shares. The “base price” for the Bezeq shares of each unit was NIS 8.62. The total amount payable by SP22017, in similar terms to the banks and the financial institutions was limited to NIS 125 (NIS 2.4289 per option unit) in the aggregate.

During the fourth quarter of 2010, the banks and the financial institutions exercised all the phantom stock options issued to them. Under the exercise terms, SP2 was obligated to pay the banks and the financial institutions a total of NIS 124 in five equal annual instalments beginning in May 2012 (the "option obligation").

On February 19, 2014, following the issuance of the Notes, the two “bullet” loans were repaid in full.above.

 

 F-61F-59 

 

 

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

 

Note 14 - Trade and Other Payables

 

   December 31, 
   2014  2015 
   NIS  NIS 
        
 Trade payables (open accounts)  664   913 
 Trade payables consisting of related parties  3   17 
 Other payables including derivatives        
 Liabilities to employees and other liabilities        
  for salaries  324   369 
 Institutions  127   79 
 Accrued expenses  110   90 
 Accrued interest  95   109 
 Deferred income  50   85 
 Derivatives  16   22 
 Other payables  19   27 
 Total other payables including derivatives  741   781 
   December 31, 
   2015  2016 
   NIS  NIS 
        
 Open accounts  885   808 
 Checks payable  28   92 
 Trade payables  913   900 
          
 Trade payables consisting of related parties  17   21 
          
 Other payables including derivatives        
 Liabilities to employees and other liabilities for salaries  369   353 
 Institutions  79   98 
 Accrued expenses  90   102 
 Accrued interest  109   84 
 Deferred income  85   82 
 Derivatives  22   10 
 Other payables  27   11 
 Total other payables including derivatives  781   740 

 

Note 15 - Provisions

 

         Dismantling    
         and clearing    
         of cellular    
   Customer  Additional  and other    
   claims  legal claims  sites  Total 
   NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS 
              
 Balance as at January 1, 2015  24   35   72   131 
                  
 Provisions created in the period  18   13   1   32 
                  
 Provisions used in the period  (4)  (4)  (4)  (12)
                  
 Provisions cancelled in the period  (3)  (2)  (20)  (25)
                  
 Consolidation of DBS  17   3   -   20 
                  
 Balance as at December 31, 2015  52   45   49   146 
                  
 Current  52   45   3   100 
                  
 Non-current  -   -   46   46 
         Dismantling    
         and clearing    
         of cellular    
   Customer  Additional  and other    
   claims  legal claims  sites  Total 
   NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS 
              
              
 Balance as at January 1, 2016  52   45   49   146 
                  
 Provisions created in the period  4   4   4   12 
                  
 Provisions used in the period  (7)  (14)  -   (21)
                  
 Provisions cancelled in the period  (5)  (5)  -   (10)
                  
 Balance as at December 31, 2016  44   30   53   127 
                  
 Current  44   30   6   80 
                  
 Non-current  -   -   47   47 

 

Claims

For details of legal claims, see Note 20.

 

 F-62F-60 

 

 

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

 

Note 16 - Financial Risk Management

 

 A.General

 

The Group is exposed to the following risks, arising from the use of financial instruments:

 

 -Credit risk
 -Liquidity risk
 -Market risk (which includes currency, interest, inflation and other price risks)

 

This Notenote provides information about the Group'sGroup’s exposure to each of the above risks, an explanation as to how the risks are managed, and the measurement processes.

 

 B.Framework for risk management

 

The Company’s Board of Directors has overall responsibility for the Company’s SP1's and SP2's risk management. Bezeq'sBezeq’s Board of Directors has responsibility for the Bezeq Group’s risk management. The purpose of risk management in the Group is to define and monitor those risks constantly, and to minimize their possible effects arising from the exposure on the basis of assessments and expectations for parameters that affect the risks. The Company'sCompany’s policy is to hedge, in part and where required according to policies determined by the board, exposure from fluctuations in foreign currencies rates and the Israeli CPI rates. Bezeq’s policy is to hedge, in part and where required according to policies determined by the board, exposure from fluctuations in foreign currencies and the Israeli CPI.

 

 C.Credit risk

 

ManagementOur management monitors our Company’s exposure to credit risks on a regular basis. Bezeq’s management monitors the Group'sBezeq Group’s exposure to credit risks on a regular basis. Cash and investments in deposits and securities are deposited in highly-rated banks.

 

Trade and other receivables

 

Bezeq'sBezeq’s management regularly monitors customer debts, and the financial statements include provisions for doubtful debts which properly reflect, in the management'smanagement’s estimation, the loss inherent in doubtful debts. In addition, the balances of trade receivables are widely spread.

 

Investments in financial assets

 

The Company'sCompany’s investment policy, which was approved by its Audit Committee, and established by the Company'sCompany’s Board of Directors, seeks to preserve principal and maintain adequate liquidity while maximizing the income received from investments without significantly increasing the risk of loss. According to the Company'sCompany’s investment policy approximately 80%75% of the funds must be invested in investment-grade securities. The Company'sCompany’s securities consist of investment grade securities, corporate debt securities and equity investments (stocks). The Company'sCompany’s investment policy imposes limitations on invested amounts by investment ratings, duration, exposure to a single issuer, exposure to a group of issuers with the same ownership, industries, geographic spread and currency exposure, thereby reducing credit risk concentrations. Transactions involving derivatives are made with entities that have high credit ratings.

 

 F-63F-61 

 

 

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

 

Note 16 - Financial Risk Management (cont'd)(cont’d)

 

 C.Credit risk (cont'd)(cont’d)

 

Investments in financial assets (cont'd)(cont’d)

 

Any investments made by Bezeq in securities are made in securities which are liquid, marketable and have low risk. Transactions involving derivatives are made with entities that have high credit ratings.

 

As of the reporting date there is no significant concentration of credit risk.

 

 D.Liquidity risk

 

Liquidity risk is the risk that the Group will be unable to honor theirits financial obligations on time. The Group'sGroup’s policy for liquidity management is to ensure, as far as possible, that it will always have sufficient liquidity to honor those liabilities on time, without incurring undesirable losses. In addition, for debentures issued by the CompanyGroup and its subsidiaries, see Note 13.

 

 E.Market risks

 

The purpose of market risk management is to manage and oversee the exposure to market risks within accepted parameters to prevent significant exposures to market risks that will influence the Group'sGroup’s results, liabilities and cash flows.

 

During the normal course of its business, the Group takesenters into full or partial hedging actions. The Group takes into account the effects of the exposure in its considerations for determining the type of loans it takes and in the management of its investment portfolio.

 

Israeli CPI risk

 

Changes in the rate of Israeli inflation affect the Group'sGroup’s profitability and its future cash flows, mainly due to its Israeli CPI-linked liabilities. In applying a policy of minimizing the exposure the Company has invested in bonds that are linked to the Israeli CPI in order to partially hedge the exposure to changes in the Israeli CPI. In addition, the Group enters into forward transactions against the Israeli CPI. The duration of the forward transactions is the same as or shorter than the duration of the hedged exposures. Bezeq applies hedge accounting with regards to its forward CPI hedge transactions.

 

A considerable part of Bezeq'sBezeq’s cash balances are invested in deposits, monetary funds or ETF'sETF’s which are exposed to changes in their real value as a result of changes in the Israeli CPI.

 

 F-64F-62 

 

 

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

 

Note 16 - Financial Risk Management (cont'd)(cont’d)

 

 E.Market risks (cont'd)(cont’d)

 

Foreign currency risk

The Company is exposed to foreign currency risks associated with the Notes that are denominated in US$. In order to hedge its exposure to fluctuations in the US$ exchange rate resulting from the Note issuance, the Company entered into five Cross Currency Swap ("CCS") hedge transactions to hedge a total of $725 principal and interest amount of the Notes.

 

Bezeq is exposed to foreign currency risks mainly due to payments for purchases of terminal equipment and property, plant and equipment which are in or linked to the US$ or the Euro. In addition, the Group provides services for customers and receives services from suppliers worldwide for which it is paid and it pays in foreign currency, mainly US$.

 

Note 17 - Financial Instruments

 

 A.Liquidity risk

 

Below are the contractual repayment dates of financial liabilities, including estimated interest payments:

 

   December 31, 2015 
   Carrying  Contractual           2021 
   amount  cash flow  2016  2017  2018-2020  and later 
   NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS 
 Non-derivative financial liabilities                  
 Trade and other payables  1,661   1,661   1,661   -   -   - 
 Bank loans  3,219   3,528   808   924   1,564   232 
 Debentures  11,160   12,793   1,779   1,574   4,376   5,064 
 Liability to Eurocom DBS  233   233   233   -   -   - 
                          
 Total  16,273   18,215   4,481   2,498   5,940   5,296 
                          
 Financial liabilities for derivative instruments                        
 Forward contracts on                        
 CPI and copper price  174   174   28   -   114   32 
   December 31, 2016 
   Carrying  Contractual           2022 
   amount  cash flow  2017  2018  2019-2021  and later 
   NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS 
 Non-derivative  financial liabilities                  
 Trade and other payables  1,599   1,599   1,599   -   -   - 
 Bank loans  3,923   4,117   719   797   1,861   740 
 Debentures  9,574   10,916   1,460   1,576   3,724   4,156 
 Liability to Eurocom DBS  32   32   32   -   -   - 
                          
 Total  15,128   16,664   3,810   2,373   5,585   4,896 
                          
 Financial liabilities for derivative instruments                        
 Forward contracts on CPI and copper price  176   176   -   40   115   21 

 

 F-65F-63 

 

 

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

 

Note 17 - Financial Instruments (cont'd)(cont’d)

 

 B.Linkage and foreign currency risks

 

The Company’sGroup’s exposure to linkage and foreign currency risk was as follows based on notional amounts:

 

   December 31, 2014 
         Foreign 
      Israeli  currency linked 
   Unlinked  CPI-linked  (mainly US$ ) 
   NIS  NIS  NIS 
           
 Current assets         
 Cash and cash equivalents  698   -   15 
 Restricted cash  64   -   1 
 Trade receivables  2,187   16   24 
 Other receivables  5   110   - 
 Investments including  derivatives  2,453   96   553 
 Total current assets  5,407   222   593 
              
 Non-current assets            
 Long-term trade and other receivables  509   57   - 
 Investments including derivatives  90   -   181 
 Equity-accounted investment  -   2,181   - 
 Total non-current assets  599   2,238   181 
 Total assets  6,006   2,460   774 
              
 Current liabilities            
 Debentures, loans and borrowings  1,074   427   - 
 Trade and other payables  1,159   46   152 
 Total current liabilities  2,233   473   152 
              
 Non-current liabilities            
 Debentures and bank loans  6,010   3,293   3,054 
 Other liabilities including derivatives  -   103   - 
 Total non-current liabilities  6,010   3,396   3,054 
              
 Total liabilities  8,243   3,869   3,206 
              
 Total exposure in the statement of financial position  (2,237)  (1,409)  (2,432)
              
 Forward transactions  (5,062)  2,501   2,561 
   December 31, 2015 
         Foreign 
      Israeli  currency linked 
   Unlinked  CPI-linked  (mainly US$ ) 
   NIS  NIS  NIS 
           
 Current assets         
 Cash and cash equivalents 561  -  20 
 Restricted cash  154   -   1 
 Trade receivables  2,019   21   18 
 Other receivables  20   111   - 
 Investments including  derivatives  999   65   471 
 Total current assets  3,753   197   510 
              
 Non-current assets            
 Long-term trade and other receivables  482   192   - 
 Investments including derivatives  55   -   230 
 Total non-current assets  537   192   230 
 Total assets  4,290   389   740 
              
 Current liabilities            
 Debentures, loans and borrowings  1,396   693   - 
 Trade and other payables  1,324   62   225 
 Total current liabilities  2,720   755   225 
              
 Non-current liabilities            
 Debentures and bank loans  5,141   4,181   2,968 
 Other liabilities including derivatives  -   154   5 
 Total non-current liabilities  5,141   4,335   2,973 
              
 Total liabilities  7,861   5,090   3,198 
              
 Total exposure in the statement of financial position  (3,571)  (4,701)  (2,458)
              
 Forward transactions  (5,068)  2,091   2,977 

 

 F-66F-64 

 

 

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

 

Note 17 - Financial Instruments (cont'd)(cont’d)

 

 B.Linkage and foreign currency risks (cont’d)

 

  December 31, 2015 
        Foreign 
     Israeli  currency linked 
  Unlinked  CPI-linked  (mainly US$ ) 
  NIS  NIS  NIS 
          
Current assets         
Cash and cash equivalents  561   -   20 
Restricted cash  154   -   1 
Trade receivables  2,019   21   18 
Other receivables  20   111   - 
Investments including  derivatives  999   65   471 
Total current assets  3,753   197   510 
             
Non-current assets            
Long-term trade and other receivables  482   192   - 
Investments including derivatives  55   -   230 
Total non-current assets  537   192   230 
Total assets  4,290   389   740 
             
Current liabilities            
Debentures, loans and borrowings  1,396   693   - 
Trade and other payables  1,324   62   225 
Total current liabilities  2,720   755   225 
             
Non-current liabilities            
Debentures and bank loans  5,141   4,181   2,968 
Other liabilities including derivatives  -   154   5 
Total non-current liabilities  5,141   4,335   2,973 
             
Total liabilities  7,861   5,090   3,198 
             
Total exposure in the statement of financial position  (3,571)  (4,701)  (2,458)
             
Forward transactions  (5,068)  2,091   2,977 

 

DBS has forward transaction to reduce exposure to changes in the USD exchange rate. As at March 31, 2015, the net fair value of these transactions is NIS 11.

   December 31, 2016 
         Foreign 
      Israeli  currency linked 
   Unlinked  CPI-linked  (mainly US$ ) 
   NIS  NIS  NIS 
           
 Current assets            
 Cash and cash equivalents 733  -  29 
 Trade receivables  1,954   18   28 
 Other receivables  20   48   - 
 Investments including  derivatives  719   34   154 
 Total current assets  3,426   100   211 
              
 Non-current assets            
 Investments including derivatives  429   215   - 
 Total non-current assets  429   215   - 
 Total assets  3,855   315   211 
              
 Current liabilities            
 Debentures, loans and borrowings  1,668   383   - 
 Trade and other payables  1,340   56   203 
 Total current liabilities  3,008   439   203 
              
 Non-current liabilities            
 Debentures and bank loans  7,667   3,779   - 
 Other liabilities including derivatives  -   176   9 
 Total non-current liabilities  7,667   3,955   9 
              
 Total liabilities  10,675   4,394   212 
              
 Total exposure in the statement of financial position  (6,820)  (4,079)  (1)
              
 Forward transactions  (2,266)  1,994   272 

 

 F-67F-65 

 

 

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

 

Note 17 - Financial Instruments (cont'd)(cont’d)

 

 B.Linkage and foreign currency risks (cont’d)

 

The Group has CPI forward transactions for the Israeli CPI and forward exchange contracts on foreign currencies:

 

   Currency/ Currency/         
   linkage linkage    Par value    
   receivable payable Expiry date  (currency)  Fair value 
          NIS  NIS 
               
 December 31, 2014             
 Forward exchange contracts on foreign currencies  US$  NIS  2018   2,561   174 
 Israeli CPI forward contracts Israeli CPI NIS  2016-2022   2,501   (119)
                  
 December 31, 2015                
 Forward exchange contracts on foreign currencies  US$  NIS  2018   2,561   180 
 Israeli CPI forward contracts Israeli CPI NIS  2016-2022   2,507   (174)
   Currency/ Currency/         
   linkage linkage    Par value    
   receivable payable Expiry date  (currency)  Fair value 
          NIS  NIS 
               
 December 31, 2015             
               
 Forward exchange contracts on foreign currencies US$ NIS  2018   2,561   180 
 Israeli CPI forward contracts Israeli CPI NIS  2016-2022   2,507   (174)
                  
 December 31, 2016                
 Israeli CPI forward contracts Israeli CPI NIS  2018-2022   1,994   (176)

 

Information regarding the Israeli CPI and significant exchange rates:

 

   Year ended December 31  December 31 
   2013  2014  2015  2013  2014  2015 
   Rate of change  Reporting date spot rate 
   %  %  %  NIS  NIS  NIS 
                    
 1 US dollar  (7.0)  12.0   0.3   3.471   3.889   3.902 
 1 euro  (2.8)  (1.2)  (10.1)  4.782   4.725   4.247 
 Israeli CPI in Points  1.9   (0.3)  (0.9)  141.67   141.28   140.01 
   Year ended December 31  December 31 
   2014  2015  2016  2014  2015  2016 
   Rate of change  Reporting date spot rate 
   %  %  %  NIS  NIS  NIS 
                    
 1 US dollar  12.0   0.3   (1.5)  3.889   3.902   3.845 
 1 euro  (1.2)  (10.1)  (4.8)  4.725   4.247   4.044 
 Israeli CPI in Points  (0.3)  (0.9)  (0.3)  141.28   140.01   139.59 

 

 C.Interest rate risk

 1.Profile

 

At the reporting date the interest rate profile of the Group'sGroup’s interest-bearing financial instruments was:

 

   December 31 
   2014  2015 
   NIS  NIS 
        
 Fixed rate instruments      
 Financial assets  3,325   2,816 
 Financial liabilities  (11,469)  (12,316)
    (8,144)  (9,500)
 Variable rate instruments        
 Financial assets  125   149 
 Financial liabilities  (2,390)  (2,065)
    (2,265)  (1,916)
   December 31 
   2015  2016 
   NIS  NIS 
        
 Fixed rate instruments      
 Financial assets  2,816   2,189 
 Financial liabilities  (12,316)  (11,786)
    (9,500)  (9,597)
 Variable rate instruments        
 Financial assets  149   31 
 Financial liabilities  (2,065)  (1,712)
    (1,916)  (1,681)

 

 F-68F-66 

 

 

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

 

Note 17 - Financial Instruments (cont'd)(cont’d)

 

 C.Interest rate risk (cont’d)

 2.Fair value sensitivity analysis for fixed rate financial liabilities and derivatives

 

The Group does not account for any fixed rate financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss, and the Group does not designate derivatives (interest swap contracts) as hedging instruments under a fair value hedge accounting model. Therefore a change in interest rates at the reporting date would not affect profit or loss.

 

 3.Sensitivity analysis of cash flow for instruments at variable interest

 

An increase of 100 basis points in the interest rates at the reporting date would have decreased shareholders'shareholders’ equity and profit or loss by NIS 14 (2014:13 (2015: NIS 17)14).

 

 D.Cash flow hedge accounting

 

Cash flow hedges for CPI-linked liabilities

 

Bezeq entered into several forward contracts, as described in the table below, in order to reduce its exposure to changes in the CPI for its CPI-linked debentures (Series 5 and Series 6). These transactions hedge specific cash flows of certain of the Bezeq debentures and are recognized as cash flow hedge accounting. The expiry date of these transactions complies with the repayment schedule of the relevant debentures. The fair value of the forward contracts is based on observable market-based data (level 2) in fair value hierarchy.

 

     Number of Nominal     Capital 
 Hedge item Repayment date Transactions��Value  Fair value  reserve 
       NIS  NIS  NIS 
 December 31, 2014:             
 Debentures (Series 5) June 2015- June 2016 4  662   (35)  16 
 Debentures (Series 6) December 2018 - December 2022 8  1,699   (75)  47 
        2,361   (110)  63 
 December 31, 2015:                
 Debentures (Series 5) June 2016 2  322   (22)  3 
 Debentures (Series 6) December 2018 - December 2022 8  1,699   (146)  67 
        2,021   (168)  70 

Subsequent to the subsequent to the balance sheet date, Bezeq entered into a new transaction to hedge Debentures (Series 6). The scope of the transaction is NIS 295. The maturity date of this transaction is December 2018.

     Number of  Nominal     Capital 
 Hedge item Repayment date Transactions  Value  Fair value  reserve 
        NIS  NIS  NIS 
 December 31, 2015:              
 Debentures (Series 5) June 2016  2   322   (22)  3 
 Debentures (Series 6) December 2018 - December 2022  8   1,699   (146)  67 
          2,021   (168) ��70 
 December 31, 2016:                  
 Debentures (Series 6) December 2018 - December 2022  8   1,994   (176)  54 
          1,994   (176)  54 

 

 F-69F-67 

 

 

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

 

Note 17 - Financial Instruments (cont'd)(cont’d)

 

E.Fair value

 

(1)Financial instruments measured at fair value for disclosure purposes only

 

The table below shows the difference between the carrying amount and the fair value of groups of financial instruments. theThe carrying amount of other financial assets and liabilities does not differ significantly from their fair value. The fair value of debentures issued to the public is based on their quoted closing price at the reporting date (Level 1). The fair value of loans and non-marketable debentures is based on the present value of future principal and interest cash flows, discounted at the market rate of interest suitable for similar liabilities plus the required adjustments for risk premium and non-marketability at the reporting date (Level
(Level 2).

 

   December 31, 2014  December 31, 2015 
               Fair value 
               weighted 
               average 
   Carrying     Carrying     discount 
   amount  Fair value  amount  Fair value  rate 
   NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  % 
                 
 Secured loans from banks and others               
 Unlinked  2,112   2,292   1,904   2,044   2.05 
 Debentures                    
 Issued to the public (CPI linked)  3,840   4,033   3,816   4,006   1.55 
 Issued to the public (Unlinked)  2,044   2,214   1,991   2,119   1.24 
 Issued to institutional investors (CPI linked)  -   -   1,310   1,314   1.66 
 Issued to institutional investors (US$ linked)  3,073   3,309   2,986   3,258   5.55 
 Issued to institutional investors (unlinked)  403   467   403   458   2.11 
                      
    11,472   12,315   12,410   13,199     
   December 31, 2015  December 31, 2016 
               Fair value 
               weighted 
               average 
   Carrying  Fair  Carrying  Fair  discount 
   amount  value  amount  value  rate 
   NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  % 
                 
 Secured loans from banks and others               
 Unlinked  1,904   2,044   2,947   3,089   2.60 
 Debentures                    
 Issued to the public (CPI linked)  3,816   4,006   3,473   3,656   1.18 
 Issued to the public (Unlinked)  1,991   2,119   4,166   4,246   2.65 
 Issued to institutional investors (CPI linked)  1,310   1,314   830   879   1.14 
 Issued to institutional investors (US$ linked)  2,986   3,258   -   -   - 
 Issued to institutional investors (unlinked)  403   458   403   440   2.17 
                      
    12,410   13,199   11,819   12,310     

 

(2)Financial instruments measured at fair value

 

The table below analyses financial instruments carried at fair value, by valuation method.

 

   December 31, 2014 
   Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  Total 
   NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS 
              
 Financial assets held for trading            
 Monetary funds and ETFs  1,513   -   -   1,513 
 Marketable securities  879   -   -   879 
 Derivatives not used in hedging                
 Forward contracts on foreign currencies  -   174   -   174 
 Forward contracts on CPI  -   (119)  -   (119)
 Available-for-sale financial assets Unmarketable shares  -   -   9   9 
                  
    2,392   55   9   2,456 
   December 31, 2015 
   Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  Total 
   NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS 
              
 Financial assets held for trading            
 Monetary funds and ETFs  193   -   -   193 
 Marketable securities  772   -   -   772 
 Derivatives not used in hedging                
 Forward contracts on foreign currencies  -   180   -   180 
 Forward contracts on CPI  -   (163)  -   (163)
 Available-for-sale financial assets                
 Unmarketable shares  -   -   2   2 
 Contingent consideration for a                
 business combination  -   -   (233)  (233)
                  
    965   17   (231)  751 

 

 F-70F-68 

 

 

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

 

Note 17 - Financial Instruments (cont'd)(cont’d)

 

E.Fair value (cont'd)(cont’d)

 

(2)Financial instruments measured at fair value (cont’d)

 

   December 31, 2015 
   Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  Total 
   NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS 
              
 Financial assets held for trading            
 Monetary funds and ETFs  193   -   -   193 
 Marketable securities  772   -   -   772 
 Derivatives not used in hedging                
 Forward contracts on foreign currencies  -   180   -   180 
 Forward contracts on CPI  -   (163)  -   (163)
 Available-for-sale financial assets                
 Unmarketable shares  -   -   2   2 
 Contingent consideration for a  business combination  -   -   (233)  (233)
    965   17   (231)  751 

   December 31, 2016 
   Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  Total 
  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS 
              
 Financial assets held for trading            
 Monetary funds and ETFs  31   -   -   31 
 Marketable securities  321   -   -   321 
 Derivatives not used in hedging                
 Forward contracts on CPI  -   (170)  -   (170)
 Contingent consideration for a                
 business combination  -   -   (84)  (84)
                  
    352   (170   (84)  98 

 

a.The fair value of investments in financial funds and ETFs is determined by reference to their average quoted selling price at the reporting date (level(Level 1).
b.The fair value of forward contracts on the CPI or foreign currency is based on discounting the difference between the price in the forward contact and the price of the present forward contact for the balance of the contract term until redemption, at an appropriate interest rate (level(Level 2). The estimate is made under the assumption that a market participant takes into account the credit risks of the parties when pricing such contracts.
c.Information about fair value measurement of contingent consideration in a business combination (Level 3)

 

Below is the fair value of the contingent consideration liability for a business combination, as described in Note 12B:

 

   December 31, 2015 
   Maximum additional    
   consideration    
   under the    
   agreement  Fair value 
   NIS  NIS 
 Additional consideration for tax synergy (first additional consideration)(1)  200   204 
 Additional consideration for the business results of DBS (second additional consideration) (2)  170   29 
    370   233 
   December 31, 2015  December 31, 2016 
   Maximum     Maximum    
   additional     additional    
   consideration     consideration    
   under the     under the    
   agreement  Fair value  agreement  Fair value 
   NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS 
              
 Additional consideration for tax synergy (first additional consideration)  200   204   -   - 
 Additional consideration for the business results of DBS (second additional consideration)  170   29   170   84 
                  
    370   233   170   84 

 

 F-71F-69 

 

 

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

 

Note 17 - Financial Instruments (cont'd)(cont’d)

 

E.Fair value (cont'd)(cont’d)

 

(2)Financial instruments measured at fair value (cont’d)

 

(1)First additional consideration

The fair value of the additional first contingent consideration was calculated on the basis of the agreement in principle with the tax assessor for the scope of the carryforward losses of DBS as described in Note 12B above and it includes accrued interest.

(2)Second additional consideration

The fair value of the first additional consideration was estimated by the assessor, using the Monte Carlo simulation with risk neutral measure of the underlying asset which is the expected cash flowincome of DBS for 2016-2017.in 2017 and based on the assumptions regarding expected cash flows.

 

F.Offset of financial assets and liabilities

 

The Group has agreements with various communication companies to supply and receive communication services. The table below presents the carrying amount of the balances as stated in the statement of financial position:

 

   December 31, 
   2014  2015 
   NIS  NIS 
 Trade and other receivables, gross  151   147 
 Offset amounts  (114)  (115)
 Trade and other receivables presented in the statement of financial position  37   32 
          
 Trade payables, gross  165   157 
 Offset amounts  (114)  (115)
 Trade and other payables presented in the statement of financial position  51   42 
   December 31, 
   2015  2016 
   NIS  NIS 
 Trade and other receivables, gross  147   119 
 Offset amounts  (115)  (97)
 Trade and other receivables presented in the statement of financial position  32   22 
          
 Trade payables, gross  157   147 
 Offset amounts  (115)  (97)
 Trade and other payables presented in the statement of financial position  42   50 

 

 F-72F-70 

 

 

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

 

Note 18 - Employee Benefits

 

Employee benefits include post-employment benefits, other long-term benefits, termination benefits, short-term benefits and share-based payments. For details of share-based payments, see Note 29 below.

 

A.Liabilities for employee benefits

 

   December 31, 
   2014  2015 
   NIS  NIS 
        
 Current liabilities for:        
 Holiday  86   104 
 Sick leave  111   117 
 Early retirement  55   150 
 Current maturities of pensioner benefits  7   7 
 Total current liability for employee benefits  259   378 
 Non-current liabilities for:        
 Liability for pensioner benefits  121   114 
 Severance compensation (net) (see composition below)  48   55 
 Early notice  20   16 
 Pension  44   55 
         
 Total non-current liabilities for employee Benefits  233   240 
 Total liabilities for employee benefits  492   618 
 Composition of liabilities for severance pay:        
 Liabilities for severance pay  215   221 
 Fair value of plan assets  (167)  (166)
    48   55 
     
   December 31, 
   2015  2016 
   NIS  NIS 
        
 Current liabilities for:        
 Holiday  104   104 
 Sick leave  117   122 
 Early retirement  150   82 
 Current maturities of pensioner benefits  7   7 
 Total current liability for employee benefits  378   315 
 Non-current liabilities for:        
 Liability for pensioner benefits  114   118 
 Severance compensation (net) (see composition below)  55   51 
 Early notice  16   19 
 Pension  55   70 
 Total non-current liabilities for employee Benefits  240   258 
 Total liabilities for employee benefits  618   573 
 Composition of liabilities for severance pay:        
 Liabilities for severance pay  221   212 
 Fair value of plan assets  (166)  (161)
    55   51 

 

Pelephone employees

F-73

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)


Note 18 - Employee Benefits (cont’d)

B.Defined contribution plans

 

(1)Liabilities for employee benefits at retirement age in respect of the period of their service with Bezeq and its subsidiaries, and for employees to which Section 14 of the Severance Pay Law – 1963 applies, are covered in full by regular payments made by Bezeq and its subsidiaries to pension funds and insurance companies.

 

   Year ended December 31, 
   2013  2014  2015 
   NIS  NIS  NIS 
              
 Amount recognized as an expense for a defined contribution plan  182   191   199 
   Year ended December 31, 
   2014  2015  2016 
   NIS  NIS  NIS 
              
 Amount recognized as an expense for a defined contribution plan  191   199   209 

 

(2)The pension rights of Bezeq'sBezeq’s employees for the period of their employment in the civil service through January 31, 1985, are covered by a pension fund ("the(the” Makefet Fund"Fund”), which assumed the obligations of State of Israel following an agreement between the Government of Israel, Bezeq, the General Federation of Laborers in Israel ("Histadrut"(“Histadrut”) and the Makefet Fund.

F-71

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 18 - Employee Benefits (cont’d)

B.Defined contribution plans

 

(3)Severance obligation to employees who will retire on terms entitling them to compensation is covered for the period from February 1, 1985 by on-going contributions to such pension funds and insurance companies (in accordance with Section 14 of the Severance Pay Law).

 

Severance pay for the period of employment in the civil service through January 31, 1985, is paid by Bezeq, and the sums accumulated in the Makefet Fund for that period are kept in a fund that will be used for the employees'employees’ rights.

 

(4)For certain employees, Bezeq has an obligation to pay severance in excess of the amount accumulated on behalf such employees in the compensation fund. See section 18.C(1) below.

 

C.Defined benefit plans

 

Obligations for defined benefit plans in the Bezeq Group include the following:

 

(1)Severance obligation for the balance of the obligation that is not covered by contributions and/or insurance policies in accordance with the existing labor agreements, the Severance Pay Law, and the salary components for which the management of the Bezeq Group believes entitle the employees to receive compensation. For this part of the obligation, there are deposits in the name of the Bezeq Group in pension funds and insurance companies. The deposits in pension funds and insurance companies include accrued linkage differences and interest. Withdrawal of the reserve sums is contingent upon fulfillment of the provisions in the Severance Pay Law.

F-74

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 18 - Employee Benefits (cont’d)

C.Defined benefit plans (cont'd)

 

(2)An obligation in accordance with the collective agreement of 2006 for employees who were transferred from civil service to Bezeq and who are entitled following retirement to a supplement in pension payments for the difference between the Civil Service Law and the standard policy of Makefet. Bezeq also has an obligation to a number of senior employees who are entitled to early retirement terms (pension and retirement grants) which are not dependent on the existing retirement agreements for all employees.

 

(3)An obligation in accordance with the employment agreements of some of the senior employees in the Bezeq Group for payment of a benefit for early termination notice.

 

(4)Bezeq'sBezeq’s retirees receive, in addition to pension payments, benefits which consist mainly of a holiday gift (linked to the dollar exchange rate), financing for the upkeep of retiree clubs and social activities. Bezeq'sBezeq’s liability for these costs accumulates during the employment period. The Company’s financial statements include the liabilities for expected costs in the post-employment period.

 

D.F-72

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 18 - Employee Benefits (cont’d)

D.Other long-term employee benefits (Sick leave provision)

 

The financial statements include a provision in respect of redemption and utilization of sick leave. The right to accumulate sick leave was taken into account for all employees in the Bezeq Group. Only employees eligible under the terms of the employment agreement may redeem sick leave. The provision was computed on the basis of an actuarial calculation, including the assumption of positive accumulation of days by most of the employees and utilization of days in accordance with the last in first out (LIFO) method.

 

E.Benefits for early retirement and termination in Bezeq

 

According to the collective agreement of December 2006, between Bezeq and the employees union and the New Histadrut, and according to the amendment to the agreement of August 2015, Bezeq may, at its discretion, terminate the employment of 163 permanent employees in each of the years 2015-2021 (Bezeq’s right is cumulative for the period).

 

Bezeq recognizes expenses for early retirement when it is significantly committed, without any real possibility of withdrawal, to a defined plan to terminate employment before the defined date, according to a defined plan. The collective agreement allows Bezeq to dismiss employees, but does not create a significant commitment without any real possibility of withdrawal. Accordingly, Bezeq recognizes the expense for early retirement on the date the plan is approved by its Board of Directors, since only after the approval of its Board of Directors and publication of the decision, does Bezeq have a significant commitment without any real possibility of withdrawal.

 

In 2015,2016, expenses of the early retirement plan amounted to NIS 117.

F-75

B Communications Ltd.96.

 

NotesIn addition, the Bezeq Group companies have collective agreements with the Histadrut and the employees’ committees. The agreements include mechanisms to integrate the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts areemployees’ committees in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 18 - Employee Benefits (cont’d)decisions regarding the termination of permanent employees and the terms of severance.

 

F.Actuarial assumptions

 

Principal actuarial assumptions for defined benefit plans at the reporting date are as follows:

 

(1)Mortality rates are based on the rates published in Insurance Circulars 2013-3-1 of the Ministry of Finance.

 

(2)Churn rates were determined on the basis of the past experience of Bezeq and its subsidiaries, distinguishing between different employee populations and taking into account the number of years of employment. The churn rates include a distinction between severance with entitlement to full severance compensation and severance without entitlement to this right.

 

(3)As of December 31, 2015, the realThe discount rate (nominal) is based on the yieldof high quality on linked high-quality corporate bonds linked to the Israeli CPI anddebentures with similar duration to thatmaturity dates approximating those of the gross liability.obligation.

 

As of December 31, 2014, the real discount rate (nominal) is based on the yield

F-73

B Communications Ltd.

of high quality corporate bonds linkedNotes to the Israeli CPI and with similar duration to that of the gross liability.Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 18 - Employee Benefits (cont’d)

F.Actuarial assumptions (cont’d)

The main discount rates are as follows:

   December 31, 2015  December 31, 2016 
  Average capitalization rate  Average capitalization rate 
    %   % 
 Severance compensation  4.1   4.2 
 Retirement benefits  4.7   4.3 

 

(4)The main discount rates are as follows:

   December 31, 2014  December 31, 2015 
   Average capitalization rate  Average capitalization rate 
   %  % 
 Severance compensation  3.7   4.1 
 Retirement benefits  4.7   4.74 

(5)Assumptions regarding salary increments for calculation of the liabilities were made on the basis of the management'smanagement’s assessments, distinguishing between the groups of employees. The main assumptions (in nominal terms) regarding salary increases are as follows:

 

   Salary increase assumptions
 Bezeq permanent employees Average update of 7% for young employees,
 decreasing gradually to 2.7% at the age of 66.
 New Bezeq permanent employees Average update of 3.2% for young employees,
decreasing gradually to 1.4% at the age of 66.
 Bezeq non-permanent employees 6.5% for young employees decreasing gradually to 0%,
3.5% for senior employees
 Pelephone employees An increase of 3.1% as from 2015,, as set out in the
collective agreement at Pelephone
Bezeq International employeesAn increase of 3.0%, as set out in the collective agreement at Bezeq International

 

Regarding Bezeq'sBezeq’s employees, as well as the assumption of the age-dependent wage increase, an expected individual wage growth was assumed for 2016-2026,2017-2026, arising from the collective agreement that was signed in August 2015.

 

(6)Sensitivity analysis for actuarial assumptions

The following is an analysis of the possible effect of the changes in the principal actuarial assumptions on liabilities to employee benefits. The calculation is made for each assumption separately, assuming that the remaining assumptions remain unchanged.

   Year ended December 31, 
   2015  2016 
   Years  Years 
 Discount rate - addition of 0.5%  (25)  (28)
 Rate of future salary increases - addition of 0.5%  36   36 
 Rate of employees leaving - addition of 5.0%  (13)  (10)

 F-76F-74 

 

 

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

 

Note 18 - Employee Benefits (cont’d)

 

F.Actuarial assumptions (cont'd)(cont’d)

(6)Sensitivity analysis for actuarial assumptions

Changes in the actuarial assumptions which are reasonably possible as at the reporting date are not expected to have a material effect on the liabilities for employee benefits.

 

(7)Average weighted useful life of liabilities for the main severance benefits:

 

   Year ended December 31, 
   2014  2015 
   Years  Years 
 Severance compensation  10.9   10.2 
 Retirement benefits  15.7   14.4 
   Year ended December 31, 
   2015  2016 
   Years  Years 
 Severance compensation  10.2   10.0 
 Retirement benefits  14.4   14.1 

 

Note 19 - Income Tax

 

A.Corporate tax rate

 

The tax rate relevant to the Company was 25% in 2012 and 2013. As from January 1, 2014 until December 31, 2015, the rate of corporate tax was 26.5%.

As at December 31, 2015, deferred tax balances were calculated according to the The corporate tax rate expected to apply on the utilization date (26.5%)for 2016 was 25%.

 

On January 4, 2016 the Knesset plenum approved a bill to amendpassed the Law for the Amendment of the Income Tax Ordinance including(Amendment 216), 2016, which includes a reduction in the corporate tax by 1.5%rate from 26.5% to 25%, as from January 1, 2016. Consequently, inOn December 22, 2016, the Group expectsKnesset plenum passed the Economic Efficiency Law (Legislative Amendments for Achieving Budget Objectives in 2017 and 2018) – 2016, by which, among other things, the corporate tax rate would be reduced from 25% to reduce24% in 2017 and to 23% as from January and thereafter.

Deferred tax balances as at December 31, 2016 were calculated according to the new tax assetsrates expected to apply on the date of reversal. As a result of the lower tax rate as set out above, deferred tax balances were reduced and liabilities for deferred taxes and recognize a net expensetax expenses of NIS 3167 were recognized in the statement of income for deferred taxes.2016.

 

B.Composition of income tax expenses (income)

 

   Year ended December 31, 
   2013  2014  2015 
   NIS  NIS  NIS 
           
 Current tax expense  576   781   567 
 Deferred tax income  (55)  (126)  (209)
 Adjustments for prior years, net  3   12   - 
              
 Income tax expense  524   667   358 
   Year ended December 31, 
   2014  2015  2016 
   NIS  NIS  NIS 
           
 Current tax expense  781   567   437 
 Deferred tax expenses (income)  (126)  (209)  33 
 Adjustments for prior years, net  12   -   (28)
              
 Income tax expense  667   358   442 

 

 F-77F-75 

 

  

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

 

Note 19 - Income Tax (cont’d)

 

C.Reconciliation between the theoretical tax on the pre-tax income and the tax expense

 

   Year ended December 31, 
   2013  2014  2015 
   NIS  NIS  NIS 
           
 Income before income tax  1,463   1,798   1,494 
 Statutory tax rate  25%  26.5%  26.5%
 Income tax at the statutory tax rate  366   476   395 
              
 Changes in tax rate  14   -   - 
 Expenses not recognized for tax  purposes  23   (5)  (13)
 Adjusted tax calculated for the  Company’s share in equity-  accounted investees  63   45   (3)
 Recognition of deferred tax assets  which were not recognized  on prior periods  -   -   (101)
 Current year tax losses and  benefits for which deferred  taxes were not created  55   139   80 
 Taxes in respect of previous years  3   12   - 
 Income tax expenses  524   667   358 

   Year ended December 31, 
   2014  2015  2016 
   NIS  NIS  NIS 
           
 Income before income tax  1,798   1,494   931 
 Statutory tax rate  26.5%  26.5%  25%
 Income tax at the statutory tax rate  476   395   232 
              
 Changes in tax rate  -   -   67 
 Expenses not recognized for tax            
  purposes  (5)  (13)  46 
 Adjusted tax calculated for the Company’s share in equity-accounted investees  45   (3)  1 
 Recognition of deferred tax assets which were not recognized on prior periods  -   (101)  - 
 Current year tax losses and benefits for which deferred taxes were not created  139   80   124 
 Taxes in respect of previous years  12   -   (28)
 Income tax expenses  667   358   442 

 

D.Unrecognized deferred tax liabilities

 

The calculation of deferred taxes does not take into account the taxes that would be applicable in the caseevent of the sale of investments in subsidiaries and associates, since the Group intends to retain the investments. Deferred taxes in respect of a distribution of profit in subsidiaries and associates were also not taken into account since the dividends are not taxable.

 

E.Unrecognized deferred tax assets and carry-forward tax loss

 

As at December 31, 2015,2016, the Company has tax loss carry-forwards in the amount of NIS 299172 and no capital loss carry forwardsforwards.

F-76

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in the amount of NIS 33.millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 19 - Income Tax (cont’d)

E.Unrecognized deferred tax assets and carry-forward tax loss (cont’d)

 

Deferred tax assets relating to carry-forward losses and tax benefits were not recognized because their utilization in the foreseeable future is not probable. The deductible temporary differences and tax losses do not expire under current tax legislation. Deferred tax assets have not been recognized in respect of these items since it is not probable that future taxable profit will be available against which the Group can utilize the benefits.

 

As a result, as at December 31, 2015,2016, deferred taxes were not created on carry-forward losses and on carry-forwards capital losses of the Company as detailed above.

 

On February 1,2016, after the balance sheet date, the1, 2016, The Company sold shares of Bezeq (see note 1), as a result, the Company recognized a deferred taxestax asset due outsideto the basis difference attributed to its investment ofin Bezeq in the amount of NIS 101.

F-78

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 19 - Income Tax (cont’d)101 during 2015.

 

F.Recognized deferred tax assets and liabilities

 

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are attributable to the following items:

 

              Carry-       
   Property, plant           forward tax       
   equipment,     Carry-     losses and  Brand    
   and  Employee  forward     deferred  Name and    
   intangible  benefits  losses for     expenses  Customers    
   assets  plan  DBS  Provisions  and other  relationship  Total 
   NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS 
                       
 Balance of deferred tax asset (liability) as at December 31, 2013  (466)  232   -   27   22   (787)  (972)
 Recognized in profit or loss  (8)  (23)  -   -   32   125   126 
 Recognized in other comprehensive income  -   -   -   -   11   -   11 
                              
 Balance of deferred tax assets (liability) as at December 31, 2014  (474)  209   -   27   65   (662)  (835)
                              
 Balance of deferred tax asset (liability) as at December 31, 2014  (474)  209   -   27   65   (662)  (835)
 Recognized in profit or loss  52   1   (7)  -   40   124   221 
 Business combination  -   -   1,426   -   45   (301)  1,170 
 Recognized in other comprehensive income  -   -   -   -   5   -   5 
                              
 Balance of deferred tax assets (liability) as at December 31, 2015  (422)  210   1,419   27   155   (839)  550 

   Property,                
   plant                
   equipment,     Carry-     Brand    
   and  Employee  forward     Name and    
   intangible  benefits  losses for     Customers    
   assets  plan  DBS  Others  relationship  Total 
   NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS  NIS 
                    
 Balance of deferred tax asset (liability) as at December 31, 2014  (474)  209   -   92   (662)  (835)
 Recognized in profit or loss  52   1   (7)  40   124   210 
 Business combination  -   -   1,426   45   (301)  1,170 
 Recognized in  equity  -   -   -   5   -   5 
                          
 Balance of deferred tax assets (liability) as at December 31, 2015  (422)  210   1,419   182   (839)  550 
                          
 Balance of deferred tax asset (liability) as at December 31, 2015  (422)  210   1,419   182   (839)  550 
                          
 Recognized in profit or loss  68   (28)  (231)  (67)  224   (34)
 Recognized in equity  -   (4)  -   (98)  -   (102)
                          
 Balance of deferred tax assets (liability) as at December 31, 2016  (354)  178   1,188   17   (615)  414 

 

As at December 31, 20152016 deferred taxes are presented in the statement of financial position as follows: under deferred tax assets NIS 1,2791,007 (December 31, 2014 nil)2015 1,279) and under deferred tax liabilities NIS 729593 (December 31, 2014:2015: NIS 835)729).

 

 F-79F-77 

 

 

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

 

Note 19 - Income Tax (cont’d)

 

G.Final tax assessments

 

(1)The Company has final tax assessments up to and including 2009. On January 22, 2015, the Company entered into a tax assessment agreement with the Israeli Tax Authority (the “Agreement”), with respect to final tax assessments with respect to: (i) tax years 2007-2009; and (ii the sale of its legacy communications business that was completed on January 31, 2010. According to the Agreement, the Company will pay the Israeli Tax Authority NIS 148, including interest and CPI linkage differences, in 24 monthly instalments starting in February 2015. The Agreement does not qualify as a final tax assessment for the tax year 2010 and any such final assessment will exclude the matters agreed upon in the Agreement. The Company's financial statements include appropriate tax provisions to cover this resolution.

 

(2)On December 28, 2016, The Company received a “best judgment” tax assessment for the years 2011 and 2012 of approximately NIS 50 million (not including interest and linkage differentials). The Israeli Tax Authority is claiming that additional taxes are due with respect to the alleged capital gain generated from the capital reduction of Bezeq during the period from 2011 to 2013. The Company disagrees with the position of the Tax Authority and believes that it has good arguments to support such position. Accordingly, The Company filed an appeal to the Israeli Tax Authority with respect to such matter.

Based on The Company’s positions and arguments, The Company believes that the financial statements include appropriate tax provisions to cover these resolutions.

(3)Bezeq has received final tax assessments up to and including 2005. In 2013,2010.

(4)On September 15, 2016, Bezeq and the Israel Tax Authority signed an assessment agreement with(“the Assessment Agreement”) ending the disputes involving the tax assessor for 2006-2008, which includes undisputed income.assessor’s claims regarding the financing income from the shareholder loans and about the rights and holdings in DBS acquired by Bezeq (“the Tax Issue”) and regarding the claims of DBS that its losses should be recognized in full, as recorded in its tax reports. In addition, a decision was received according to the best judgmentTax Authority granted preliminary approval for tax purposes for the merger of DBS with and into Bezeq, in accordance with Section 103(B) of the Income Tax Ordinance (“the Approval”).

Under the Assessment Agreement, Bezeq will pay tax in the amount of NIS 462, the total losses of DBS will amount to NIS 5.26 billion as a final assessment up to December 31, 2013 and any additional loss will be added to this amount, for the Tax Issue for the period until June 2015, in the amount of NIS 315 (NIS 223 for 2014 and NIS 91 for 2015). Bezeq’s aggregate shareholdings and rights in DBS will be considered as equity in the financial statements of DBS and as a capital investment in the financial statements of Bezeq, and no other income will be recorded for Bezeq and it will not pay additional tax for the aforesaid.

F-78

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 19 - Income Tax (cont’d)

G.Final tax assessor, whereby financing expenses accumulated on the shareholders' loans that Bezeq provided DBS should be added to Bezeq's undisputed income. Bezeq filed a reservation on this decision. The reservation was dismissed and on February 24,assessments (cont’d)

Concurrently, the Tax Authority granted approval for tax purposes for the merger of DBS with and into Bezeq, in accordance with Section 103(B) of the Income Tax Ordinance, whereby subsequent to the merger, the losses of DBS as at the merger date may be offset against the profits of the absorbing company, provided that in each tax year, it will not be permitted to offset an amount exceeding 12.5% (spread over eight years) of the total losses of the transferring company and the absorbing company, or 50% of the taxable income of the absorbing company in that tax year prior to offsetting the loss from previous years, whichever is lower.

The Approval was granted in accordance with the applicable tax laws in effect at the time. Without derogating from the amount of the losses set out in the Assessment Agreement, if there is any change in the applicable tax laws, the Tax Authority will reconsider the taxation decision in accordance with the tax laws applicable at the merger date. However, it is clarified that the Approval is effective until December 31, 2019. The Tax Authority will extend the date of the Approval each year by an additional year, subject to the declaration of Bezeq and DBS that there has been no material change in their business affairs and subject to the terms of the taxation decision, and subject to the interpretation given to the tax laws, provided that such interpretation is published in writing. Any change in the tax laws that does not require a change in the Approval will not result in any such change.

The Assessment Agreement and the Approval did not affect Bezeq’s financial results in the reporting period, since the effect is included in the financial statements as at December 31, 2015, due to the agreement in principle that was agreed upon with the tax assessor. On September 29, 2016, Bezeq paid the agreed tax.

Further to Note 12B above regarding, among other things, the announcement of the Ministry of Communications that the Ministry, in the first stage, is advancing the cancellation of the corporate separation in Bezeq Group, Bezeq is negotiating with the Tax Authority, and at this state it was agreed that close to the date of merger approval from the Ministry of Communications, its compatibility with the taxation decision will be assessed.

(5)On December 25, 2016, Bezeq received ordersa best-judgment assessment for 2011, in which it intends to appeal. For 2009-2010, a decision was reached according toBezeq’s taxable income for 2011 increased by NIS 246. NIS 144 of the tax assessor's best judgment regarding the aforesaid, and regarding other matters, mainlyincreased taxable income is on account of non-recognition of financing expenses for various reasons. Bezeq fileddividends distributed and received (for distribution of current earnings, for dividends received from subsidiaries and a reservationsmall part on this decision. The reservation was dismissed and on March 30, 2016 Bezeq received orders from the tax authorities. This action will have no material effect on the financial statements. Subsequent to the dateaccount of the financial statements, Bezeq reached an agreement in principlea distribution for capital reduction), with the assessor regarding payment of taxes in the amount of NIS 460 million on financing income that accrued up to December 31, 2015 on shareholders loans provided to DBS In addition, it was agreed that the losses of DBS as at December 31, 2014, which will be recognized in a merger or offset from the income of DBS, will amount to NIS 5.4 billion and the balance of the shareholder loan will be considered as equityNIS 102 for timing differences in the financial statementsrecognition of DBS.depreciation expenses. The agreementtax liability arising from this assessment (including interest and linkage differences) is NIS 72. Implementation of the principles of the assessment in principlesubsequent years is likely to lead to a material claim for additional tax for those years. Bezeq disagrees with the position of the Tax Authority and believes it has not yet resulted in a signed agreement. The financial statements includegood arguments to support its own position against that of the Tax Authority. Accordingly, on March 29, 2017, Bezeq filed an appropriate provision based on Bezeq estimates.appeal to the Israeli Tax Authority with respect to such matter.

F-79

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 19 - Income Tax (cont’d)

G.Final tax assessments (cont’d)

 

(3)(6)Pelephone has received final tax assessments up to and including 2012.

 

(4)(7)Bezeq International has received final tax assessments up to and including 2012.

 

(5)(8)DBS has received final tax assessments up to and including 2009.under an agreement with the Tax Authority as described in section 19G (3) above.

F-80

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

 

Note 20 - Contingent Liabilities

As at December 31, 2015, contingent liabilities only include contingent liabilities relating to the Bezeq Group.

 

In addition to pending claims, during the normal course of business, new legal claims were filed against Group companies (in this section: “Legal Claims”).

 

In the opinion of the managements of the Bezeq Group companies, which is based, among other things, on legal opinions as to the likelihood of success of the claims, the financial statements (Note 15 above) include appropriate provisions, where provisions are required to cover the exposure resulting from such claims.

 

In the opinion of the management of each of the Bezeq Group companies, the additional exposure as at December 31, 2015,2016, due to claims filed against the Group companies on various matters and which are unlikely to be realized, amounts to NIS 5.56.8 billion. There is also an additional exposure of NIS 4 billion284 for claims which the likelihood of realization cannot yet be assessed.

 

In addition, motions for certification of class actions have been filed against the Group companies, for which the Group has additional exposure beyond the aforesaid, since the exact amount of the claim is not stated in the claim.

 

These amounts and all the amounts of the additional exposure in this note are linked to the CPI and are stated net of interest.

 

The Company, Internet Gold and the members of the Company’s Board of Directors have been named as respondents in a purported motion to certify a claim as a derivative claim instituted in the Tel Aviv District Court (Economic Affairs Division) on July 28, 2016. The derivative action seeks, among other things, the payment of damages of NIS 113 (together with interest) and the repayment by Internet Gold of its distributive share of the dividend paid by us in the amount of NIS 73.2 (together with interest), alleging that we unlawfully distributed a portion of the dividend we distributed in June 2016. The claim is that out of the NIS 355 distribution, NIS 113 was not derived from the net profits of our company and therefore could not be considered “retained earnings” that could be legally distributed in accordance with the Israeli Companies Law. We and Internet Gold believe that the purported derivative action has no legal merit and are seeking to dismiss the action.

For updates subsequent to the reporting date, see section B below.

 

 F-81F-80 

 

 

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

 

Note 20 - Contingent Liabilities (cont'd)(cont’d)

 

A.Following is a detailed description of the Group'sGroup’s contingent liabilities at December 31, 2015,2016, classified into groups with similar characteristics.

 

     Balance of provisions  Amount of additional exposure  Amount of exposure for claims for which the amount of exposure cannot be assessed 
 Claims group Nature of the claims NIS  NIS  NIS 
             
 Claims of employees and former employees of Group companies Mainly collective and individual claims filed by Bezeq employees and former Bezeq employees in respect of recognition of various salary components as components for calculation of payments to Bezeq employees, some of which have wide ramifications in Bezeq.  10   115   - 
                
 Customer claims Mainly motions for certification of class actions concerning contentions of unlawful collection of payment and impairment of the service provided by the Group companies.  52   3,112   4,083 
                
 Supplier and communication provider claims Claims for compensation for alleged damage as a result of the supply of the service and/or the product.  3   222   6 
                
 Claims for punitive damages, real estate and infrastructure Claims for alleged physical damage or damage to property caused by Bezeq Group companies and regarding real estate and infrastructure.
The additional amount of exposure for punitive damages does not include claims for which the insurance coverage is not disputed.
  2   35   - 
                
 Claims by enterprises and companies Claims alleging liability of the Bezeq Group companies in respect of their activities and/or the investments made in various projects.  11   2,047*  - 
                
 Claims by the State and authorities Various claims by the State of Israel, government institutions and authorities (“the Authorities”). These are mainly procedures related to regulations relevant to the Bezeq Group companies and financial disputes concerning monies paid by the Group companies to the authorities (including property taxes) or by the authorities to the Group companies.  19   15   - 
                
 Total legal claims against Bezeq Group companies    97   5,546   4,089 
     Balance of provisions  Amount of additional exposure  Amount of exposure for claims for which the amount of exposure cannot be assessed 
 Claims group Nature of the claims NIS  NIS  NIS 
             
 Customer claims  Mainly motions for certification of class actions concerning contentions of unlawful collection of payment and deterioration in service provided by the Group companies.  44   4,530   281**
                
 Claims by enterprises and companies Claims alleging liability of the Group companies in respect of their activities and/or the investments made in various projects.  11   2,005*  - 
                
 Claims of employees and former employees of Group companies Mainly collective and individual claims filed by employees and former employees of the Company in respect of recognition of various salary components as components for calculation of payments to Company employees, some of which have wide ramifications in the Company.  7   96   2 
                
 Claims by the State and authorities Various claims by the State of Israel, government institutions and authorities (“the Authorities”). These are mainly procedures related to regulations relevant to the Group companies and financial disputes concerning monies paid by the Group companies to the Authorities (including property taxes) or by the Authorities to the Group companies.  6   11   - 
                
 Supplier and communication provider claims Legal claims for compensation for alleged damage as a result of the supply of the service and/or the product.  3   102   1 
                
 Claims for punitive damages, real estate and infrastructure Claims for alleged physical damage or damage to property caused by Group companies and in relation to real estate and infrastructure.
The additional amount of exposure for punitive damages does not include claims for which the insurance coverage is not disputed.
  3   37   - 
                
 Total legal claims against Bezeq Group companies    74   6,781   284 

*This sum includes a total exposure of NIS 2 billion for a claim filed by a shareholder against the Company and officers in the Company, which the plaintiff estimates at NIS 1.1 billion or NIS 2 billion (according to the method of calculating the damage to be determined).
**There is an additional exposure in respect of claims; the exposure for these claims cannot yet be assessed.

 

 F-82F-81 

 

 

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

 

Note 20 - Contingent Liabilities (cont'd)(cont’d)

 

B.Subsequent customer claims

 

Subsequent to the reporting date, a claim for NIS 8391.3 billion was filed against Bezeq and officers of Bezeq. At the approval date of the financial statements, the exposure for these claims cannot yet be assessed. In addition, claims against Group companies with exposure of NIS 554.560 came to an end.

 

Note 21 - Agreements

 

A.The Group companies have operating lease agreements for land, property cellular sites, real estate, and vehicles used by them. The minimum future contractual rental payments during the next five years, calculated according to the rental fees in effect as at December 31, 2015,2016, are as follows:

 

   Real estate  Vehicles  Total 
 Year ended December 31, NIS  NIS  NIS 
 2016  238   132   370 
 2017  227   104   331 
 2018  174   62   236 
 2019  139   -   139 
 2020  99   -   99 
 2021 onwards  104   -   104 
    981   298   1,279 
   Real estate  Vehicles  Total 
 Year ended December 31, NIS  NIS  NIS 
 2017  229   140   369 
 2018  211   97   308 
 2019  171   77   248 
 2020  125   -   125 
 2021  55   -   55 
 2022 onwards  110   -   110 
    901   314   1,215 

 

B.A.In May 2013, PelephoneDBS signed an agreement with Space Communications Ltd. (“Spacecom”) for space segment capacity (in this section “the 2013 Agreement”). The 2013 Agreement is valid until 2028. In the first stage, the space segments will be available for use by DBS in the Amos 2 and Amos 3 satellites. In September 2016, Spacecom informed DBS that the Amos 2 satellite had come to the end of its lifespan, but its commercial operation is continuing for now. In accordance with the provisions of the 2013 Agreement, after discontinuing the use of the Amos 2 satellite, DBS intends to lease space segments in the Amos 3 satellite (until 2022) and the Amos 6 satellite, which was planned for launching into space in the third quarter of 2016 and the end of its lifespan was expected to be in 2028.

In September 2016, Spacecom reported that to the best of its knowledge, during ground fueling of the launch rocket for the Amos 6 satellite, the launch rocket exploded, resulting in the total loss of the Amos 6 satellite, which was intended to replace the Amos 2 satellite for DBS broadcasts.

In February 2017, the board of directors of DBS and the board of directors of Bezeq approved an addendum to the 2013 Agreement between DBS and Spacecom. The main points are set out below (“the 2017 Agreement”). The 2017 Agreement was approved by the general meetings of Bezeq and Spacecom on April 3, 2017. The 2017 Agreement is valid until December 31, 2028 (the same term as the 2013 Agreement), subject to the options for early termination set out below.

F-82

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 21 - Agreements (cont’d)

DBS will lease space segments in the following satellites: (a) Amos 3 satellite - which currently serves DBS; (b) Amos 7 satellite - the existing satellite, in which Spacecom holds the right to lease space segments and, according to Spacecom, its positioning was completed at the end of February 2017; (c) Amos 8 satellite - a new satellite that is expected to serve DBS when it becomes operational.

In the contract period (subject to events of unavailability and until the end of the lifespan of Amos 3, which is expected in 2026), DBS is expected to lease space segments from two different satellites, according to the division in the agreement. The agreement also establishes the positioning of backup space segments in the contract period, under the terms and within the limitations in the agreement.

The overall nominal cost for the entire contract period is estimated at US$ 263 and represents an average annual cost of US$ 21.9, subject to discounts and reimbursements set out in the agreement.

The agreement stipulates the right to early termination without cause, subject to advance notice of 12 months and payment of the consideration in accordance with the prescribed mechanism. The agreement also stipulates the right to early termination due to a delay in the entry into force of the agreement for construction of Amos 8, and the right to early termination at the end of the lifespan of Amos 3 due to non-availability of Amos 8, without payment of compensation and under the conditions set out in the agreement.

For information about the agreement with Spacecom, see Note 31 regarding the agreements with related parties.

C.In October 2016, the new agreement with Apple Distribution International (“Apple”) came into effect for continuedthe acquisition and distribution of iPhones in Israel. According toiPhone devices. In accordance with the agreement, under certain circumstances, Pelephone is required to purchase a minimum number of iPhones every yeardevices for an additional three years at the prices in effect onat the manufacturer at the actual purchase date. Pelephone believes that, similar to previous years, these quantities will constitute a substantial part of the quantities of iPhones that it expects to sell in the agreement period.

 

C.D.Pelephone has obligations as of December 31, 20152016 amounting to NIS 7471 (as at December 31, 2014,2015, NIS 95)74) to acquire terminal equipment.

 

D.E.Pelephone has Ericsson infrastructure equipment for the UMTS/HSPA and LTE networks. Pelephone has multi-annual agreements for maintenance, support and upgrade of software for the UMTS/HSPA network and an agreement for deployment of the 4G network (LTE) with Ericsson, and Pelephone believes that it could be dependent on Ericsson for network support and its expansion.

F.As at December 31, 2016, DBS has agreements for the acquisition of channels.broadcast rights. In 2015,2016, expenses for consumption of channelsbroadcast rights acquired by DBS amounted to NIS 287 million.319.

 

E.G.For information about agreements for the acquisition of broadcast rights by DBS, see Note 11. For information about agreements for the purchase of property, plant and equipment, see Note 8 above.
F.On October 26, 2015, the District Planning and Building Committee approved the validation of the outline plan for an area of 70 dunam (net) for warehouses and offices in Saqiya (near the Messubim junction). As at this date, Bezeq is entitled to receive this area in a capitalized lease contract for 49 years that commenced on March 22, 1993 with an option to extend for another 49 years, for no consideration. This right was granted to the Company under the settlement agreement of May 15, 2003 between Bezeq and the government of Israel and the Israel Lands Authority, which was given the force of a court ruling on March 10, 2004. Exercise of the right is subject to approval from the planning institutions for planning the complex, which was received on October 26, 2015.

 F-83 

 

 

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

 

Note 21 - Agreements (cont'd)

As at the reporting date, the fair value of Bezeq's rights to the land is estimated at NIS 450.(cont’d)

 

G.H.In April 2013, Bezeq and the Israel Lands Administration signed a planning permission contract for 1.15 hectares in Sakia (near Mesubim Junction, close to the southern entrance to Tel Aviv). Under the contract, Bezeq developed a detailed master plan for the property, determining purposes, uses, building rights and building instructions for zoning the land in the plan. On May 2, 2016, approval of the plan was published in the gazette and it came into effect. Bezeq expectsto sign a lease for the property covering a net area of 7 hectares. As at the reporting date, the fair value of Bezeq’s rights to the land was estimated by an assessor at NIS 460.

I.For information about agreements for undertakings to provide credit for 2016-2017,2017, see Note 13D above.13 below.

H.J.For information about agreementstransactions with related parties, including the agreement between DBS and Space Communications Ltd. for the lease of space segments, see Note 31.

I.For agreements for the purchase of property, plant and equipment, see Note 8 above.

 

Note 22 - Securities, Pledges and Guarantees

The Group’s policy is to provide tender, performance and legal guarantees. In addition, the Company provides bank guarantees, where necessary, for banking obligations of subsidiaries.

 

A.For securities, pledges and stipulations given by the Company and its subsidiaries in connection with loan covenants and borrowings see Note 13.

B.The Bezeq Group companies have provided guarantees of NIS 190163 in favor of the Ministry of Communications to secure the terms of their licenses (mostly linked to the US$ exchange rate).

 

C.B.The Bezeq Group companies have provided bank guarantees of NIS 9277 in favor of third parties.

 

D.C.For information about the conditions for loans and borrowings, see note 13.

 

E.D.For information about the guarantee provided by Bezeq in respect of DBS'sDBS’s liability for Debentures (Series B) see Note 13C.

 

Note 23 - Capital and Capital Reserves

 

A.Equity

 

   Authorized  Registered and paid up 
   December 31  December 31 
   2014 and 2015  2014 and 2015 
   Number of shares 
          
 Ordinary shares of NIS 0.1 par value each  50,000,000   29,889,045 
  Authorized  Registered and paid up 
  December 31  December 31 
  2015 and 2016  2015 and 2016 
  Number of shares 
         
Ordinary shares of NIS 0.1 par value each  50,000,000   29,889,045 

  

 F-84 

 

 

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

 

Note 23 - Capital and Capital Reserves (cont’d)

 

B.Dividend distributions

 

On May 21, 2015, the Company'sCompany’s Board of Directors declared a dividend of NIS 2.24 per share and NIS 67 million in the aggregate. The payment date was June 16, 2015.

 

On August 31, 2015, the Company'sCompany’s Board of Directors declared a dividend of NIS 0.73 per share and NIS 22 million in the aggregate. The payment date was September 29, 2015.

 

On November 19, 2015, the Company'sCompany’s Board of Directors declared a dividend of NIS 1.27 per share and NIS 38 million in the aggregate. The payment date was December 10, 2015.

On May 25, 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a dividend of NIS 11.88 per share and NIS 355 in the aggregate. The payment date was June 29, 2016.

Note 24 - Revenues

 

   Year ended December 31, 
   2013  2014  2015 
   NIS  NIS  NIS 
           
 Domestic fixed line communications         
 Fixed line telephony  1,908   1,636   1,543 
 Internet - infrastructure  1,283   1,394   1,530 
 Transmission and data communication  794   802   840 
 Other services  220   220   212 
    4,205   4,052   4,125 
              
 Cellular            
 Cellular services and terminal equipment  2,744   2,399   1,948 
 Sale of terminal equipment  1,000   966   884 
    3,744   3,365   2,832 
              
 International communications, internet services and NEP  1,367   1,425   1,487 
              
 Multi-channel television  -   -   1,333 
              
 Others  247   213   208 
    9,563   9,055   9,985 
   Year ended December 31, 
   2014  2015  2016 
   NIS  NIS  NIS 
           
 Domestic fixed line communications         
 Fixed line telephony  1,636   1,543   1,450 
 Internet - infrastructure  1,394   1,530   1,558 
 Transmission and data communication  802   840   843 
 Other services  220   212   213 
    4,052   4,125   4,064 
              
 Cellular            
 Cellular services and terminal equipment  2,399   1,948   1,777 
 Sale of terminal equipment  966   884   811 
    3,365   2,832   2,588 
              
 International communications, internet services and NEP  1,425   1,487   1,480 
              
 Multi-channel television  -   1,333   1,745 
              
 Others  213   208   207 
    9,055   9,985   10,084 

 

 F-85 

 

 

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

 

Note 25 - Salaries

 

   Year ended December 31, 
   2013  2014  2015 
   NIS  NIS  NIS 
           
 Salaries and incidentals:         
 Operating  1,741   1,691   1,871 
 General and administrative  590   562   586 
 Share-based compensation  34   1   - 
              
 Total salaries and incidentals  2,365   2,254   2,457 
 Less - salaries recognized in investments in property, plant and equipment and in intangible assets  492   484   499 
              
    1,873   1,770   1,958 
   Year ended December 31, 
   2014  2015  2016 
   NIS  NIS  NIS 
           
 Salaries and incidentals:         
 Operating  1,691   1,871   1,922 
.General and administrative  562   586   622 
 Share-based compensation  1   -   - 
              
 Total salaries and incidentals  2,254   2,457   2,544 
 Less - salaries recognized in investments in property, plant and equipment and in intangible assets  484   499   529 
              
    1,770   1,958   2,015 

 

Note 26 - General and Operating Expenses*

 

   Year ended December 31, 
   2013  2014  2015 
   NIS  NIS  NIS 
           
 Terminal equipment and materials  1,071   928   880 
 Interconnectivity and payments to domestic and international operators  905   847   909 
 Maintenance of buildings and sites  607   639   616 
 Marketing and general expenses  622   605   647 
 Services and maintenance by sub-contractors  162   137   199 
 Vehicle maintenance expenses  152   154   167 
 Content services expenses  65   58   458 
              
    3,584   3,368   3,876 
   Year ended December 31, 
   2014  2015  2016 
   NIS  NIS  NIS 
           
 Terminal equipment and materials  928   880   831 
 Interconnectivity and payments to domestic and international operators  847   909   825 
 Maintenance of buildings and sites  639   616   605 
 Marketing and general expenses  605   647   706 
 Services and maintenance by sub-contractors  137   199   261 
 Vehicle maintenance expenses  154   167   164 
 Content services expenses  58   458   629 
              
    3,368   3,876   4,021 

 

*Less expenses of NIS 6364 recognized in 20152016 for investments in property, plant and equipment and intangible assets (in 2014,2015, NIS 63 and in 2013,2014, NIS 64)63).

 

Note 27 - Other Operating Expenses (Income), net

 

   Year ended December 31, 
   2013  2014  2015 
   NIS  NIS  NIS 
           
 Provision for severance pay in early retirement  90   176   117 
 Profit from the sale of Coral Tell shares  -   (582)  - 
 Capital gain from sale of property plant and equipment  (102)  (124)  (136)
 Others  69   (5)  22 
    57   (535)  3 
   Year ended December 31, 
   2014  2015  2016 
   NIS  NIS  NIS 
           
 Provision for severance pay in early retirement  176   117   96 
 Profit from the sale of Coral Tell shares  (582)  -   - 
 Capital gain from sale of property plant and equipment  (124)  (136)  (86)
 Others  (5)  22   11 
    (535)  3   21 

 

 F-86 

 

 

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

 

Note 28 - Financing Expenses (Income)

 

   Year ended December 31 
   2013  2014  2015 
   NIS  NIS  NIS 
           
 Income on bank deposits,  investments and others  (45)  (33)  (14)
 Change in fair value of financial  assets measured at fair value  through profit or loss  (58)  (245)  (27)
 Income in respect of credit in  sales, net of discount  (122)  (84)  (52)
 Interest and linkage differences from  loans to an associate  (226)  (213)  (21)
 Other finance income  (72)  (50)  (40)
              
 Total financing income  (523)  (625)  (154)
              
 Interest expenses on financial liabilities  651   825   634 
 Linkage and exchange rate differences, net  92   333   61 
 Financing expenses for dividends payable  22   -   - 
 Change in fair value of financial  assets measured at fair value  through profit or loss  12   5   4 
 Financing expenses for employee benefits, net  15   21   16 
 Reduction of the provision for assessor  interest expenses  -   -   (76)
 Other financing expenses  51   52   50 
              
 Total financing expenses  843   1,236   689 
              
 Financing expense, net  320   611   535 

F-87

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

  Year ended December 31 
  2014  2015  2016 
  NIS  NIS  NIS 
          
Income on bank deposits, investments and others  (33)  (14)  (13)
Change in fair value of financial assets measured at fair value through profit or loss  (245)  (27)  (29)
Income in respect of credit in sales, net of discount  (84)  (52)  (42)
Linkage and exchange rate differences, net  -   -   (16)
Interest and linkage differences from loans to an associate  (213)  (21)  - 
Other finance income  (50)  (40)  (23)
             
Total financing income  (625)  (154)  (123)
             
Interest expenses on financial liabilities  825   634   871 
Linkage and exchange rate differences, net  333   61   38 
Change in contingent consideration in a business combination  -   -   55 
Change in fair value of financial assets measured at fair value through profit or loss  5   4   23 
Financing expenses for employee benefits, net  21   16   15 
Reduction of the provision for assessor interest expenses  -   (76)  - 
Other financing expenses  52   50   52 
             
Total financing expenses  1,236   689   1,054 
             
Financing expense, net  611   535   931 

 

Note 29 - Share-Based Payments

 

Bezeq'sBezeq’s share-based payments

 

In 2010, Bezeq issued 69.4 employee options. As at December 31, 2015, Bezeq has one option plan settled in shares through a net exercise mechanism. All of the2016, 17 thousand options that were granted are non-marketable and the exercise price is adjusted to changes in equity and distribution of dividends. Below are additional details.

 Name of plan Number of options granted (before forfeitures and exercise)  Number of options in circulation as at December 31, 2015  Weighted average of exercise price as at December 31, 2015  Weighted average of remaining contractual life
   In thousands  NIS   
 Employee option plan of 2010  69,495   4,347   2.72*  One month

remain outstanding. In 2015, 27 million2016, 4 options were exercised, for which Bezeq issued 19 million4 ordinary shares of NIS*NIS 1 par value each.

_____

F-87

* Represent single NISB Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 30 - Earnings (Loss) per Share

 

The calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share was based on income (loss) attributable to ordinary shareholders, and on a weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding, calculated as follows:

 

   Year ended December 31 
   2013  2014  2015 
   NIS  NIS  NIS 
           
 Income (loss) attributable to ordinary Shareholders         
 Basic earnings (loss) for the year  137   (21)  210 
 Effect of diluted per share loss in a  subsidiary  (2)  (3)  (2)
              
 Diluted earnings (loss) for the year  135   (24)  208 

  Year ended December 31 
  2014  2015  2016 
  NIS  NIS  NIS 
          
Earnings (loss) attributable to ordinary Shareholders         
Basic earnings (loss) for the year  (21)  210   (236)
Effect of diluted per share loss in a subsidiary  (3)  (2)  - 
             
Diluted earnings (loss) for the year  (24)  208   (236)

 

   Year ended December 31 
   2013  2014  2015 
   Thousands of  Thousands of  Thousands of 
   shares of NIS 0.1  shares of NIS 0.1  Shares of NIS 0.1 
   par value  par value  par value 
              
 Weighted average number of ordinary shares at December 31 (basic and   diluted)  29,889   29,889   29,889 

F-88

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

  Year ended December 31 
  2014  2015  2016 
  Thousands of  Thousands of  Thousands of 
  shares of NIS 0.1  shares of NIS 0.1  Shares of NIS 0.1 
  par value  par value  par value 
             
Weighted average number of ordinary shares (basic and  diluted)  29,889   29,889   29,889 

 

Note 31 - Transactions with Related Parties

 

A.Identity of related parties

 

The Company’s related parties are as defined in IAS 24 (2009) - Related Party Disclosures and include: Internet Gold, its ultimate parent Eurocom, and other Eurocom Group companies, related parties of Eurocom, directors and key management personnel in the Company, Internet Gold, the Eurocom Group companies and persons who are close to a family member of any of these individuals.

 

In the ordinary course of business, some of the Company'sCompany’s subsidiaries and affiliates engage in business activities with each other. Such business activities are primarily between Bezeq orand Bezeq subsidiaries and between other Eurocom Group companies, such as Eurocom Digital Communications, Eurocom Cellular Communications, Space Communications, Gilat Satcom Satlink Communications, and to a lesser extent other affiliated companies.

 

Such business activities primarily relate to the provision, purchase or sale of communications or digital services and products,including, the provision of related satellite or broadcast services, cellular and electronic products and equipment, and Internet and telephony services.

 

The transactions among these related parties are made at prices and on terms equivalent to those charged in transactions with unrelated parties under similar conditions.

 

Ordinary course of business transactions are aggregated in this Note. This Notenote also includes detailed descriptions of material related party transactions.

 

B.Balances with related parties

   December 31, 
   2014  2015 
   NIS  NIS 
          
 Receivables - associates, net  15   9 
          
 Loans to an associate, see section C below*  2,181   - 
          
 Liabilities to related parties, net *,**  (40)  (16)
          
 Liability to Eurocom for contingent consideration  -   (233)

*Bezeq provided a shareholder loans to DBS between 1999 and 2005. As from the date of acquisition of control in DBS as described in Note 12B above and consolidation of the financial statements of DBS in the Group's consolidated financial statements, these loans are not shown in the statement of financial position.

**The amounts are for IGLD, its ultimate parent Eurocom, and their related parties.

 F-89F-88 

 

 

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

 

Note 31 - Transactions with Related Parties (cont’d)

 

C.B.TransactionsBalances with related parties

 

   Year ended December 31, 
   2013  2014  2015 
   NIS  NIS  NIS 
           
 Revenues         
 From associates (including interest income in respect of shareholders loans)*  246   229   30 
 From related parties **  8   9   10 
 Expenses            
 To related parties **  127   120   128 
 To associates  7   1   3 
 Investments            
 Related parties **  66   76   76 
              
 Acquisition of DBS  -   -   913 
   December 31, 
   2015  2016 
   NIS  NIS 
        
 Receivables - associates, net  9   10 
          
 Liabilities to related parties, net *  (16)  (12)
          
 Liability to Eurocom for contingent consideration  (233)  (32)

 

*The amounts are for IGLD, its ultimate parent Eurocom, and their related parties.

C.Transactions with related parties

   Year ended December 31, 
   2014  2015  2016 
   NIS  NIS  NIS 
           
 Revenues         
 From associates (including interest income in respect of shareholders loans)*  229   30   7 
 From related parties **  9   10   13 
 Expenses            
 To related parties **  120   128   165 
 To associates  1   3   2 
 Investments            
 Related parties **  76   76   59 
              
 Acquisition of DBS  -   913   - 

*Revenues from associates are include mainly finance income from shareholders loans to DBS, see note 12B.
**The amounts are for IGLD,Internet Gold, Eurocom, and their related parties.

 

 F-90F-89 

 

 

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

 

Note 31 - Transactions with Related Parties (cont’d)

 

E.D.Transactions listed in section 270(4) of the Companies Law

 

Approval date of the general meeting (after approval of Bezeq'sBezeq’s audit committee and Board of Directors) Nature of the transaction Amount of the transaction
     
Approved by Bezeq's Board of Directors on April 25, 2013 in accordance with the Companies Regulations (Relief in Transactions with Interested Parties), 2000 ("the Relief Regulations for Transactions with Interested Parties")Extension of the arrangements approved at Bezeq's general meeting on October 14, 2010, between Bezeq and DBS and between Bezeq International and DBS for reciprocal marketing of products and services until December 31, 2015.The fees to be paid by the parties to each other will be in accordance with the criteria approved by the general meeting as part of the original approval for the agreement.
May 8, 2013 Approval of Bezeq'sBezeq’s vote at the general meeting of DBS in favor of DBS'sDBS’s agreement with Space Communications Ltd. ("(“Space Communications"Communications”) for leasing space segments, in which the original agreement will be amended and extended. The agreement is valid until the end of 2028.
This agreement was valid in the reporting year and up to December 31, 2016. On February 12, 2017 and February 14, 2017, Bezeq’s audit committee and board of directors, respectively, approved an amendment/addendum to this agreement, and was approved by the general meetings of Bezeq and Spacecom on April 3, 2017. For information about the amendment, see Note 21B above.
 TotalA total amount of up to USDUS$ 227 (netfor the entire agreement period (up to December 31, 2018) net including discounts for satellite segments leased in the existing agreement).
     
June 13, 2013 The amendment to Bezeq'sBezeq’s three-year agreement with Eurocom Communications Ltd. ("(“Eurocom Communications"Communications”) for ongoing management and consultation services valid until May 31, 2016, unless one of the parties announces its intention to terminate the agreement with three months’ notice. This agreement was valid in the reporting year and up to May 31, 2016. The agreement described in section below came into effect on June 1, 2016. NIS 5.5 per year.
     
November 6, 2013
Approved by Bezeq'sthe Bezeq’s Board of Directors on November 6, 2013 in accordance with the relief regulations for transactions with interested parties
 Amendment to and extension of DBS'sDBS’s agreement with Eurocom and ADB for acquisition of yesMaxTotal3 converters.converters, for a period up to December 31, 2016. The total cost will be USDUS$ 10 per year.
     
January 27, 2014Approval of Bezeq's vote at the general meeting of DBS in favor of DBS's agreement with Eurocom and ADB for the acquisition of an additional quantity of yesMaxTotal converters and power supplies for yesMax HD converters, until June 30, 2015.For converters: at a total cost of USD 14; there is an additional 2.42% of additional cost for the hard drive only, if there are changes due to an increase in hard drive prices.
For power supplies: at a total cost of USD 197 thousand.
Approved by Bezeq's Board of Directors on November 27, 2014 in accordance with the relief regulations for transactions with interested partiesApproval of the extension of supplier credit terms in accordance with the agreement between DBS and Space Communications for lease of space segments, up to December 31, 2015.NIS 874 thousand.

F-91

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 31 - Transactions with Related Parties (cont’d)

E.Transactions listed in section 270(4) of the Companies Law (cont’d)

Approval date of the general meeting (after approval of Bezeq's audit committee and Board of Directors)Nature of the transactionAmount of the transaction
January 14,March 23, 2015 Approval of Bezeq's vote at the general meeting of DBS in favor of DBS'sBezeq’s acquisition agreement with Eurocom DBS Ltd. (“Eurocom DBS”) whereby Bezeq will acquire the entire holdings of Eurocom DBS in DBS shares DBS and ADB forall the order of an additional quantity of yesMaxTotal converters, until December 31, 2015.A total cost of USD 12  and an additional price of upshareholder loans provided by Eurocom DBS to 1.9% for the cost of the hard drive only, if there are changes due to an increase in hard drive prices.
March 23, 2015AcceptanceDBS (including acceptance of the terms established by the Antitrust CommissionerCommissioner’s in his approval of the merger on March 26, 2014, both by Bezeq and by DBS, (in the context of Bezeq's vote in the general meeting of DBS) and announcement of the exercise at no cost, of Bezeq'sBezeq’s option for the allotment from DBS of 6,221 DBS shares, of DBS,at no cost, representing 8.6% of the share capital of DBS. Bezeq's engagement in an acquisition agreement with Eurocom DBS was also approved, whereby Bezeq will acquire the entire holdings of Eurocom DBS in DBS shares and all the shareholder loans provided by Eurocom DBS to DBS.DBS). The total cost is comprised of: a) total cash of NIS 680; b) total cash of up to NIS 200, subject to certain conditions; c) total cash of up to NIS 170, subject to certain conditions. For additional information about the conditions relating to b and c, see Note 12B above.
     
October 19, 2015 Approval of Bezeq'sBezeq’s vote at the general meeting of shareholders of DBS in favor of DBS'sDBS’s agreement with Eurocom and ADB for the order of yesMaxTotal3 converters, under the existing agreement, until December 31, 20172017. Total cost of USD 14 millionUS$ 14.

F-90

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 31 - Transactions with Related Parties (cont’d)

D.Transactions listed in section 270(4) of the Companies Law (cont’d)

Approval date of the general meeting (after approval of Bezeq’s audit committee and Board of Directors)Nature of the transactionAmount of the transaction
     
December 8,18, 2015 Amendment to the framework agreement between Pelephone and Eurocom Cellular Communications Ltd., so that it will be extended to other products and brands, including related services for all products and its extension until December 31, 2018 (or three years after the acquisition date of any additional products or brands, whichever is earlier). Annual scope of up to NIS 50 million (for all the products).
     
June 30, 2016 Extension of the amended agreement with Eurocom Communications Ltd. (“Eurocom Communications”) for ongoing management and consultation services for Bezeq. The agreement is for three years, valid until May 31, 2019, unless one of the parties submits three-month notice of termination of the agreement. This agreement between the parties is in continuation of the agreement approved on June 13, 2013, described in section above.NIS 6.4 per year.
 F-92 

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 31 - Transactions with Related Parties (cont’d)

November 27, 2014E.Transactions listedBeeq’s agreement to bring forward payments with Eurocom, according to which DBS may advance, at the supplier’s request, payments that are due, or will be due, to Eurocom for orders of converters.Up to a total cost of US$ 6.
November 3, 2016
Bezeq’s agreement with Eurocom for the additional acquisition of up to 90 thousand VTECH N VDSL routers, valid until June 30, 2017.Approval for acquisition of up to US$ 11.3 (not including VAT).
In 2016, there were no acquisitions under this framework, however N VDSL routers were acquired in section 270(4) ofamounts that do not exceed the Companies Law (cont'd)negligibility level.

 

The financial value of the transactions described above, which were carried out in 20152016 were as follows:

 

   Amounts 
   included in the 
   consolidated 
   financial statements 
   NIS 
     
 Expenses  10590 
 Property plant and equipment  4627 
 Acquisition of Eurocom DBS holdings in DBS (see Note 12)  91355 

F-91

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 31 - Transactions with Related Parties (cont’d)

F.E.Agreements with the Eurocom Group and Internet Gold

 

1.Registration rights agreement with Internet Gold

 

The Company entered into a registration rights agreement with Internet Gold granting it the right to demand registration of the ordinary shares it owns under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.Act. Under the registration rights agreement, the Company has granted to Internet Gold “demand” registration rights that allow it to request that the Company register under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, some or all of its ordinary shares. Internet Gold is entitled to an aggregate of five demand registrations. The Company is not required to affect any demand registration unless such demand registration is for a number of ordinary shares with a market value that is equal to at least US$ 7.5. The Company is also not required to affect more than one demand registration during any 12-month period thereafter. The Company is not obligatedthereafter or to grant a request for a demand registration within 90 days of any other demand registration.

 

Internet Gold also has “piggyback” registration rights that allow it to include the Company'sCompany’s ordinary shares it owns in any public offering of equity securities initiated by the Company (other than those public offerings pursuant to registration statements on Forms F-4, S-8 or any other successor forms). The Company also granted Internet Gold the right to request a shelf registration on Form F-3, provided that the Company will be eligible to utilize a registration statement on such form, providing for an offering to be made on a continuous basis but for no longer than one year without the consent of our audit committee.

 

Under the registration rights agreement the Company agreed to indemnify Internet Gold against any losses or damages resulting from any untrue statement or omission of material fact in any registration statement or prospectus pursuant to which Internet Gold sell ordinary shares, unless such liability arose in reliance upon and in strict conformity with information furnished in writing from Internet Gold. The Company will pay all expenses incident to any demand registration and Internet Gold will pay its respective portions of all underwriting discounts, commissions and fees attributable to the sale of its ordinary shares Internet Gold owns under the registration rights agreement.

F-93

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 31 - Transactions with Related Parties (cont’d)t.

 

F.2.Agreements with the Eurocom Group and Internet Gold (cont’d)

2.Ordinary Transactions with the Eurocom GroupRelated party transactions

 

The Company and Internet Gold lease their principal offices from Eurocom Communications Ltd. for an annual rent of NIS 59 thousand for each company. In addition Eurocom Communications Ltd. provides the Company and Internet Gold with legal services and for an annual sum of NIS 96 thousand for each company. In addition, Eurocom Real Estate Ltd. provides the Company and Internet Gold with parking spaces for NIS 8 thousand a year for each company. Eurocom Digital Communications Ltd. provides the Company and Internet Gold with additional services, such as computing services and car maintenance for an annual sum of NIS 12 thousand for each company.

3.Financial service agreement with Eurocom Capital Finance Ltd.

In February 2008, the Company entered into an execution services agreement with Eurocom Capital Finance Ltd. which is controlled by Mr. Shaul Elovitch, its controlling shareholder and the chairman of the Board of Directors, under which Eurocom Capital Finance Ltd. provides the Company with various financial services. Under the agreement, Eurocom Capital Finance Ltd. handles the execution of the Company's financial investments pursuant to direct instructions from its Chief Executive Officer, which is based on a policy that was established by its management and approved by the Board of Directors. In consideration for these services, the Company agreed to pay Eurocom Capital Finance Ltd. fees which are customary for such agreements and on market terms. The Company paid Eurocom Capital Finance Ltd. aggregate fees of approximately NIS 513 thousand, NIS 560 thousand and NIS 604 thousand for its services in the years 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively.

4.Management services agreements

The Company entered into an arrangement with Eurocom Communications Ltd. and Internet Gold, according to which the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Doron Turgeman will provide management services to the Company, Internet Gold and Eurocom Communications Ltd. In consideration for such services, each of Eurocom Communications, the Company and Internet Gold will bear 33% of Mr. Turgeman services costs.

F-94

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 31 - Transactions with Related Parties (cont’d)

F.Agreements with the Eurocom Group and Internet Gold (cont’d)

5.Other agreements

In addition, the Company receives and renders various services and products to and from related parties at market rates and in the ordinary course of business. NoneOther than the transactions described below, none of theseour related party transactions are material to the Company or to its related parties. If a related party wishes to supply products or services to the Company, theThe Company obtains a bidgenerally obtain bids from a third party to enable itthe Company to determine whether the related party’s bid is on arm’s-length terms. Any of such transactions aretransaction is subject to the approval of the Company's Audit CommitteeCompany’s audit committee and itsour board of directors (and its shareholders, if required)in some instances, the shareholders). In addition, thegenerally The Company doeswill not purchase a particular type of product or service solely from related parties, but through otherwill also have non-related vendors as well.vendors. Prices offered by non-related vendors are compared to those offered by related parties to ensure that the related parties are offering arm’s length terms.

 

F-92

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 31 - Transactions with Related Parties (cont’d)

G.E.Agreements with the Eurocom Group and Internet Gold (cont’d)

In the ordinary course of business, some of the Company’s subsidiaries and affiliates engage in business activities with each other. Such business activities are primarily among Bezeq, other Bezeq Group companies and other Eurocom Group companies, such as Eurocom Digital, Eurocom Cellular, Spacecom, Gilat Satcom, and to a lesser extent other affiliated companies. Such business activities primarily relate to the provision, purchase or sale of communications and digital services and products, including the provision of satellite or broadcasting services, cellular and electronic products and equipment, and Internet and telephony services. The transactions among these related parties are made at prices and on terms equivalent to those charged in transactions with unrelated parties under similar conditions.

1.In February 2008, the Company entered into an execution services agreement with Eurocom Capital Finance Ltd. (“Eurocom Capital”), which is controlled by Mr. Shaul Elovitch, our controlling shareholder and the chairman of our board of directors, under which Eurocom Capital provides us with various financial services. Under the agreement, Eurocom Capital handles the execution of the Company’s financial investments pursuant to direct instructions from our Chief Executive Officer, which is based on a policy that was established by the Company’s management and approved by our board of directors. In consideration for these services, the Company agreed to pay Eurocom Capital fees which are customary for such agreements and on market terms. The Company paid Eurocom Capital aggregate fees of approximately NIS 560 thousand, NIS 604 thousand and NIS 288 thousand (approximately $75 thousand) for its services in 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively.

2.The Company entered into an arrangement with Internet Gold according to which the Company’s employees provide services to both companies and the Company will pay 2/3 and Internet Gold will pay 1/3 of their compensation. The Company entered into a similar arrangement with Internet Gold with respect to the management services supplied by Mr. Doron Turgeman. The Company will pay 2/3 and Internet Gold will pay 1/3 of such costs.

3.The Company and Internet Gold together lease their principal offices from Eurocom Communications for an annual rent of NIS 59 thousand (approximately $15 thousand) for each company. In addition, Eurocom Real Estate Ltd. provides both companies with parking spaces for NIS 8 thousand (approximately $2 thousand) a year for each company. Eurocom Digital provides the Company and Internet Gold with additional services, such as computing services for an annual fee of NIS 12 thousand (approximately $3 thousand) for each company.

4.In addition, Eurocom Communications Ltd. provides both companies with legal services for an annual fee of NIS 96 thousand (approximately $24 thousand) for each company.

F-93

B Communications Ltd.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(All amounts are in millions except where otherwise stated)

Note 31 - Transactions with Related Parties (cont’d)

F.Key management personnel compensation (including directors)

 

Key management personnel compensation comprised:

 

   Year ended December 31 
   2013  2014  2015 
   NIS  NIS  NIS 
              
 Employee benefits  1   1   1 
   Year ended December 31 
   2014  2015  2016 
   NIS  NIS  NIS 
              
 Employee benefits  1   1   2 

Note 32 - Subsequent Events

1.On March 30, 2017 Bezeq received notice from DBS that Spacecom had notified it that the AMOS-2 satellite had reached the end of its commercial life and was no longer capable of broadcasting television broadcasts for Yes. Consequently, on March 31, 2017, DBS ceased using the AMOS-2 satellite and it is presently using the AMOS-3 and AMOS-7 satellites.

2.Further to Bezeq’s immediate report regarding a Supreme Court ruling which dismissed two appeals on a ruling of the Tel Aviv District Court (Economic Department) which dismissed two (consolidated) motions to certify derivative actions concerning the distribution of dividends and loans of Bezeq, on April 6, 2017, Bezeq received a copy of a petition for a further hearing in the file, which had been filed by one of the appellants.

3.On April 19, 2017, Bezeq received a class action certification motion which was filed with the Tel Aviv District Court against Bezeq and against its subsidiary, Walla, Yad2 and an advertising company owned by Walla (hereinafter collectively, the “Respondents”). The motion pertains to Bezeq’s B144 service, which enables businesses to advertise on the internet (the “Service”). According to the petitioner, the Respondents sent subscribers to the Service unlawful charges. The petitioner estimates the class action amount at NIS 1.11 billion (based on an estimate of 300,000 customers and compensation of NIS 3,700 per customer). Bezeq is studying the motion and is unable to evaluate its likelihood of success at the present stage.

 

F-95F-94 

 

S I G N A T U R E S

 

The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.

 B COMMUNICATIONS LTD.
   
 By:/s/ Doron Turgeman
  Doron Turgeman
  Chief Executive Officer
   
 By:/s/ Itzik Tadmor
  Itzik Tadmor
  Principal Financial Officer
   
Dated: April18, 2016 26, 2017  

 

 

163142