UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 20-F

 

☐   REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

OR

 

☒   ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20172019

 

OR

 

☐   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

OR

 

☐   SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

Commission file number: 001-37381

 

Medigus Ltd.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Israel

(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

 

Omer Industrial Park No. 7A, P.O. Box 3030, 8496500, Israel

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

Oded YatzkanTatiana Yosef

7A Industrial Park, P.O. Box 3030

Omer, 8496500, Israel

Tel: +972 72 260-2211260-2200

Fax: +972 72 260-2231260-2249

(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)

 

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of class Trading Symbol(s) Name of each exchange on which registered
American Depositary Shares, each representing fifty (50)
twenty (20) Ordinary Shares(1)
 

MDGS 

Nasdaq Capital Market

Ordinary shares, par value NIS 0.101.00 per share(2)
Series C WarrantsMDGSW Nasdaq Capital Market

 

(1)Evidenced by American Depositary Receipts.
(2)Notfor trading, but only in connection with the registration of the American Depositary Shares.

 

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:  None

 

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:None

 

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of December 31, 2017:2019:191,785,78482,598,738 ordinary shares, par value NIS 0.101.00 per share

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act:  

 

Yes ☐               No ☒

 

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934:

 

Yes ☐               No ☒

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

 

Yes ☒               No ☐

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405(§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  

 

Yes ☒               No ☐

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or an emerging growth company.  See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 Large Accelerated filerAccelerated filer Non-accelerated filer
     Emerging growth company

 

If an emerging growth company that prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards† provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.     ☐

 

† The term “new or revised financial accounting standard” refers to any update issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board to its Accounting Standards Codification after April 5, 2012.

 

Indicate by check mark the basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

 

U.S.GAAP

 

International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board

 

Other

 

If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.

 

Item 17 ☐               Item 18 ☐

 

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act):

 

Yes ☐               No ☒

 

 

 

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

  Page
   
 Part I 
   
Item 1.Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisors1
Item 2.Offer statistics and Expected Timetable1
Item 3.Key Information1
Item 4.Information on the Company2826
Item 4a.Unresolved staff Comments5041
Item 5.Operating and Financial Review and Prospects5041
Item 6.Directors, Senior Management and Employees6365
Item 7.Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions8182
Item 8.Financial Information8486
Item 9.The Offer and Listing8586
Item 10.Additional Information87
Item 11.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk105104
Item 12.Description of Securities Other Than Equity Securities106104
   
 Part II 
   
Item 13.Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies111
Item 14.Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of proceeds113111
Item 15.Controls and Procedures113111
Item 16A.Audit Committee Financial Expert113112
Item 16B.Code of Ethics114112
Item 16C.Principal Accountant Fees and Services114112
Item 16D.Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees114113
Item 16E.Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers114113
Item 16F.Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant114113
Item 16G.Corporate Governance115113
Item 16H.Mine Safety Disclosure115113
   
 Part III 
   
Item 17.Financial Statements116114
Item 18.Financial Statements116114
Item 19.Exhibits117115
Signatures.118117

 

i

i

 

INTRODUCTION

 

Certain Definitions

 

In this annual report, unless the context otherwise requires:

 

 references to “Medigus,” the “Company,” “us,” “we” and “our” refer to Medigus Ltd. (the “Registrant”), an Israeli company, and its consolidated subsidiary.subsidiaries with the exception of ScoutCam Inc. and ScoutCam Ltd.

references to “Group” refer to the Company together with Medigus USA and ScoutCam Inc

 

 references to “ordinary shares,” “our shares” and similar expressions refer to the Registrant’s Ordinary Shares, NIS 0.101.00 nominal (par) value per share.

 

 references to “ADS” refer to American Depositary Shares.

 

 references to “dollars,” “U.S. dollars”, “USD” and “$” refer to United States Dollars.

 

 references to “NIS” refer to New Israeli Shekels, the Israeli currency.

 

 references to the “Companies Law” refer to Israel’s Companies Law, 5759-1999, as amended.

 

 

references to the “SEC” refer to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

   
 

references to MUSE™ MUSErefer to the trade name of an endoscopy system developed by the Company which is intended as a minimally invasive treatment for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, or GERD. It should be noted that this term may

references to ScoutCam refer to the trade name of a range of micro CMOS and CCD video cameras which are suitable to both versions of the system, according to the applicable context. MUSE™ II is second version of the MUSE™ system. The system was previously called “SRS”.

medical and industrial applications.
   
 references to “endoscopy” refer to a medical procedure which is used to diagnose or treat various diseases using an endoscope (a flexible tube which contains lighting features, imaging features and a system used to direct the endoscope within bodily systems).

 

All share data information in this annual report on Form 20-F reflects a 1-for-10 reverse share split of our ordinary shares effected on November 6, 2015, and a change in the ratio of ordinary shares per ADS from five ordinary shares per ADS to 50 ordinary shares per ADS effected on March 15, 2017. The change in the ordinary shares ratio for the ADSs had the same effect as a 1-for-10 reverse stock split of the ADSs.reflects:

 

 iia 1-for-10 reverse share split of our ordinary shares effected on November 6, 2015;

 a change in the ratio of ordinary shares per ADS from five ordinary shares per ADS to 50 ordinary shares per ADS effected on March 15, 2017; and

a 1-for-10 reverse share split of our ordinary shares effected on July 13, 2018, together with a change in the ratio of ordinary shares per ADSs, such that after the reverse share split was implemented each ADS represents 20 post- reverse share split ordinary shares, instead of 50 pre- reverse share split ordinary shares.

ii

 

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

Certain information included or incorporated by reference in this annual report on Form 20-F may be deemed to be “forward-looking statements”. Forward-looking statements are often characterized by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “continue,” “believe,” “should,” “intend,” “project” or other similar words, but are not the only way these statements are identified.

 

These forward-looking statements may include, but are not limited to, statements relating to our objectives, plans and strategies, statements that contain projections of results of operations or of financial condition, statements relating to the research, development and use of our products, and all statements (other than statements of historical facts) that address activities, events or developments that we intend, expect, project, believe or anticipate will or may occur in the future.

 

Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks and uncertainties. We have based these forward-looking statements on assumptions and assessments made by our management in light of their experience and their perception of historical trends, current conditions, expected future developments and other factors they believe to be appropriate.

 

Important factors that could cause actual results, developments and business decisions to differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements include, among other things:

 

 recent material changes in our strategy;

our ability to continue as a going concern;sell or license our MUSEtechnology;
ScoutCam Inc.’s commercial success in commercializing the ScoutCamsystem;

 

 projected capital expenditures and liquidity;

 

 the overall global economic environment;

insufficient coverage or reimbursement from medical insurers;environment as well as the impact of the coronavirus strain COVID-19;

 

 the impact of competition and new technologies;

 

 general market, political, reimbursement and economic conditions in the countries in which we operate;

 

 changes in our strategy;

government regulations and approvals;

 

 changes in customers’ budgeting priorities;

litigation and regulatory proceedings;and

 

 those factors referred to in “Item 3. Key Information – D. Risk Factors,” “Item 4. Information on the Company,” and “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects”, as well as in this annual report on Form 20-F generally.

 

Readers are urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made throughout this annual report on Form 20-F, which are designed to advise interested parties of the risks and factors that may affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

 

In addition, the section of this annual report on Form 20-F entitled “Item 4. Information on the Company” contains information obtained from independent industry and other sources that we have not independently verified. You should not put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statements in this annual report are made as of the date hereof, and we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.

 

iii

iii

 

PART I

 

ITEM 1.IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISORS

 

Not applicable.

 

ITEM 2.OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE

 

Not applicable.

 

ITEM 3.KEY INFORMATION

 

A.Selected Financial Data

 

The following consolidated statement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2019, 2018, and 2015,2017, and the consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 20172019, 2018 and 2016,2017, is derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report on Form 20-F. These audited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards, or IFRS, as set forth by the International Accounting Standard Board. The consolidated statement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 20142016 and 20132015 and the consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2015, 2014,2016, and 20132015 is derived from other consolidated financial statements not included in this Form 20-F. The selected consolidated financial data set forth below should be read in conjunction with and are qualified by reference to “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” and the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and other financial information included elsewhere in this annual report on Form 20-F.

 

Until December 31, 2015, our consolidated financial statements were recorded in NIS, which was the Company’s functional and presentation currency as of such date. Effective January 1, 2016, the Company changed its functional currency to U.S. Dollar. The December 31, 2015 2014, and 2013, financial data presented in this annual report on Form 20-F was translated from NIS to USD as follows: (1) all assets and liabilities of the Company were translated using the dollar exchange rate as of December 31 of each year, as applicable;31; (2) equity items were translated using historical exchange rates at the relevant transaction dates; (3) the statement of comprehensive loss items has been translated at the average exchange rates for the respective year; and (4) the resulting translation differences have been reported as “currency translation differences” within other comprehensive loss.


Consolidated Statements of Operations Data

 

 Year ended December 31,  Year ended December 31, 
 2017  2016  2015  2014  2013  2019  2018  2017  2016  2015 
 U.S. Dollars, in thousands, except per share and
weighted average shares data
  U.S. Dollars, in thousands, except per share and
weighted average shares data
 
Revenues  467   549   624   744   691 
Revenues:           
Products  188   219   467   192   330 
Services  85   217   -   357   261 
Other  -   -   -   -   33 
  273   436   467   549   624 
                    
Cost of revenues:                                        
Products and services  219   176   277   351   311 
Products  370   164   219   81   153 
Services  85   115   -   95   124 
Inventory impairment  297   -   -   -   -   -   328   297   -   - 
  455   607   516   176   277 
                    
Gross Profit (Loss)  (49)  373   347   393   380   (182)  (171)  (49)  373   347 
Research and development expenses, net  2,208   3,655   4,384   4,025   2,275 
                    
Research and development expenses  609   1,809   2,208   3,655   4,384 
Sales and marketing expenses  846   2,125   2,680   2,341   900   326   1,354   846   2,125   2,680 
General and administrative expenses  3,005   3,684   2,842   2,280   1,908   3,081   3,338   3,005   3,684   2,842 
Other income, net  -   -   3   269   181   -   -   -   -   3 
Net change in fair value of financial assets at fair value through profit or loss  92   -   -   -   - 
Share of net loss of associates accounted for using the equity method  (216)  -   -   -   - 
Listing expenses  (10,098)  -   -   -   - 
Operating loss  (6,108)  (9,091)  (9,556)  (7,984)  (4,522)  (14,420)  (6,672)  (6,108)  (9,091)  (9,556)

Profit from changes in fair value of warrants issued to investors

  3,502   25   106   980   3,228 
Finance income (expenses), net  54   87   (14)  650   (111)
Changes in fair value of warrants issued to investors  142   148   3,502   25   106 
Financial income (expenses) in respect of deposits, bank commissions and exchange differences, net  99   (54)  54   87   (14)

Loss before taxes on income

  (2,552)  (8,979)  (9,464)  (6,354)  (1,405)  (14,179)  (6,578)  (2,552)  (8,979)  (9,464)
Taxes benefit (Taxes on income)  7   (28)  (68)  (4)  (23)  1   (20)  7   (28)  (68)
Loss for the year  (2,545)  (9,007)  (9,532)  (6,358)  (1,428)  (14,178)  (6,598)  (2,545)  (9,007)  (9,532)
Other comprehensive income (loss) for the year, net of tax  -   -   (211)  (1,573)  408 
Other comprehensive loss for the year, net of tax  (41)  -   -   -   (211)
Total comprehensive loss for the year  (2,545)  (9,007)  (9,743)  (7,931)  (1,020)  (14,219)  (6,598)  (2,545)  (9,007)  (9,743)
                    
Loss for the year is attributable to:                    
Owners of Medigus  (14,178)  (6,598)  (2,545)  (9,007)  (9,743)
Non-controlling interest  -   -   -   -   - 
  (14,178)  (6,598)  (2,545)  (9,007)  (9,743)
                    
Total comprehensive income for the period is attributable to:                    
Owners of Medigus  (14,219)  (6,598)  (2,545)  (9,007)  (9,743)
Non-controlling interest  -   -   -   -   - 
  (14,219)  (6,598)  (2,545)  (9,007)  (9,743)
                                        
  USD  USD 
Basic loss per ordinary share(1)  (0.02)  (0.26)  (0.34)  (0.33)  (0.11)  (0.18)  (0.16)  (0.20)  (2.62)  (3.35)
Diluted loss per ordinary share(1)  (0.02)  (0.26)  (0.34)  (0.33)  (0.11)  (0.18)  (0.16)  (0.23)  (2.62)  (3.35)
                                        
Weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding used to compute (in thousands)(1):                                        
Basic loss per share  125,685   34,397   28,415   19,500   13,020   78,124   41,988   12,569   3,440   2,842 
Diluted loss per share  129,690   34,397   28,415   19,500   13,020   78,124   41,988   12,969   3,440   2,842 

 

(1)Adjusted to reflect 10:1

a 1-for-10 reverse share split such that every 10of our ordinary shares were converted into one ordinary share effected on November 6, 2015, and 2015;
a change in the ratio of ordinary shares per ADS from five ordinary shares per ADS to 50 ordinary shares per ADS effected on March 15, 2017. The2017; and
a 1-for-10 reverse share split of our ordinary shares effected on July 13, 2018, together with a change in the ratio of ordinary shares ratio forper ADSs, such that after the ADSs had the same effect as a 1-for-10 reverse stockshare split was implemented each ADS represents 20 post- reverse share split ordinary shares, instead of the ADSs. For more information see “Item 4. Information on the Company A. History and Development of the Company.”50 pre- reverse share split ordinary shares.

1

  As of December 31, 
  2017  2016  2015  2014  2013 
  U.S. Dollars (in thousands) 
                
Balance Sheet Data:               
Cash and cash equivalents  2,828   3,001   10,312   10,817   6,893 
Short-term deposits  3,498   -   -   -   2,326 
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss  -   -   -   2,105   2,293 
Total assets  7,210   4,724   12,141   14,291   13,022 
Total non-current liabilities  742   463   107   208   884 
Accumulated deficit  (55,881)  (53,336)  (44,329)  (34,797)  (28,412)
Total shareholders’ equity  5,511   2,927   10,181   13,050   11,163 

The following table sets forthFor more information regarding the exchange rates of U.S. dollars per NIS for the periods indicated. Average rates are calculated by using the daily representative rates as reported by the Bank of Israelsee “Item 4. Information on the last dayCompany A. History and Development of each month during the periods presented.Company.”

 

NIS per U.S. dollars

Year High  Low  Average  Period End 
2017  3.860   3.467   3.599   3.467 
2016  3.983   3.746   3.832   3.845 
2015  4.053   3.761   3.884   3.902 
2014  3.994   3.402   3.577   3.889 
2013  3.728   3.471   3.601   3.471 

The following table sets forth the high and low daily representative rates for the NIS as reported by the Bank of Israel for each of the prior six months.

NIS per U.S. dollars
 
Month High  Low  Average  Period End 
March 2018(1)  3.469   3.431   3.450   3.434 
February 2018  3.535   3.427   3.494   3.485 
January 2018  3.460   3.388   3.423   3.405 
December 2017  3.550   3.467   3.503   3.467 
November 2017  3.544   3.499   3.517   3.499 
October 2017  3.542   3.491   3.512   3.521 
September 2017  3.584   3.504   3.537   3.529 
  As of December 31, 
  2019  2018  2017  2016  2015 
  U.S. Dollars (in thousands) 
                
Balance Sheet Data:               
Cash and cash equivalents  7,036   10,625   2,828   3,001   10,312 
Short-term deposit  -   -   3,498   -   - 
Total assets  13,334   11,239   7,210   4,724   12,141 
Total non-current liabilities(2)  1,838   197   183   226   98 
Accumulated deficit  (76,657)  (62,479)  (55,881)  (53,336)  (44,329)
 Non-controlling interests  1,424   -   -   -   - 
Total  equity  8,131   8,079   5,511   2,927   10,181 

 

(1)Through March 15, 2018.(2)We adopted Amendments to International Accounting Standard 1, “Classification of Liabilities as Current or Non-Current,” under which we classified in the statement of financial position warrants as part of current liabilities. The amendment was applied retrospectively.

 

B.Capitalization and Indebtedness

 

Not applicable.

 

C.Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds

 

Not applicable.

 

D.Risk Factors

 

You should carefully consider the risks described below, together with all of the other information in this annual report on Form 20-F. The risks described below are not the only risks facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial may also materially and adversely affect our business operations. If any of these risks actually occurs, our business and financial condition could suffer, and the price of our shares could decline.

2

Risks Relatedrelated to Ourour Business

 

Our auditors have expressed substantial doubt aboutWe made material changes to our abilitybusiness strategy during 2019. We cannot guarantee that any of these changes will result in any value to continue as a going concern, which may hinder our ability to obtain further financing.shareholders.

In the recent months, we have materially changed our business model, adjusted our exclusive focus on the medical device industry to include other industries, abandoned our strategy to commercialize the MUSE system, transferred our ScoutCamactivity into our subsidiary and consummated a securities exchange agreement in relation to such subsidiary, acquired holdings in publicly traded subsidiaries, and we are assessing several new ventures. We cannot guarantee that these strategic decisions will derive the anticipated value to us and to our shareholders, or any value at all.

We have a history of operating losses and expect to incur additional losses in the future.

Our audited consolidated financial statements

We have sustained losses in recent years, which as of December 31, 2019, accumulated to $76.7 million, including an operating net loss of $14.4 million and $6.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, were prepared under2019 and 2018, respectively. We are likely to continue to incur significant net losses for at least the assumption thatnext several years as we continue to pursue our strategy. Our losses have had, and will continue to have, an adverse effect on our shareholders’ equity and working capital. Any failure to achieve and maintain profitability would continue our operations as a going concern. Our independent registered public accounting firm has included a “going concern” explanatory paragraph in its reportto have an adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017, indicating thatwe have suffered recurring losses from operationsshareholders’ equity and haveworking capital and could result in a net capital deficiency that raises substantial doubt aboutdecline in our abilityshare price or cause us to continue as a going concern. Uncertainty concerning our ability to continue as a going concern may hinder our ability to obtain future financing. Continued operations and our ability to continue as a going concern are dependent on our ability to obtain additional funding in the near future and thereafter, and there are no assurances that such funding will be available to us at all or will be available in sufficient amounts or on reasonable terms. Our consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that may result from the outcome of this uncertainty. Without additional funds from private or public offerings of debt or equity securities, sales of assets, sales or out-licenses of intellectual property or technologies, or other transactions, we will exhaust our resources and will be unable to continuecease operations. If we cannot continue as a viable entity, our shareholders would likely lose most or all of their investment in us.

 

We will need additional funding. If we are unable to raise capital, we will be forced to reduce or eliminate our operations.

 

During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Group incurred a total comprehensive loss of approximately USD 14.2 million and a negative cash flows from operating activities of approximately USD 2.7 million. Furthermore, in the recent years the Group has suffered recurring losses from operations, negative cash flows from operating activities and has an accumulated deficit as of December 31, 2019. As a result, there is a substantial doubt about the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern.

As of December 31, 2017, and March 15, 2018,2019, we had a total cash and depositscash equivalents balance of approximately $6.3 million$3.8 million. Our management expects that we will continue to generate operating losses. Our management has initiated a plan to reduce operating expenses and $5.2 million, respectively. Basedplans to continue to fund its operations primarily through utilization of its financial resources. In addition, we may raise additional capital or realize some of its investments in other entities in order to fund its operating needs. Out management is of the opinion that based on our projected cash flows and our cash balances as of the ours current operating plan it will be able to carry out its plan for one year after the issuance date of this annual report on Form 20-F,20 - F. However, we anticipate that we are likely to continue to incur significant net losses for at least the next several years. There is no assurance however, that we will be successful in obtaining the level of financing needed for our managementoperations. If we are unable to obtain additional sufficient financing our business and results of operations will be materially harmed.

Based on the projected cash flows and current cash balances of ScoutCam, Management is of the opinion that without further fund raising weit will not have sufficient resources to enable usit to continue advancing ourits operating activities and asfor a result, there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. At our current burn rate, and without taking into account additional fund raising, our current cash balance will be sufficient until approximately December 2018, taking into account shut down costs. If we are unable to obtain additional sufficient financing, we will be forced to reduceperiod of one year after the scopeissuance date of or eliminate our operations. We will also have to reduce marketing, customer service or other resources devoted to our products. Any of these factors will materially harm our business and results of operations.

Our management’sthis annual report on Form 20 - F. ScoutCam's management plans include the continuedcontinuing commercialization of ourthe products taking cost reduction steps and securing sufficient financing through the sale of additional equity securities, debt or capital inflows from strategic partnerships.partnerships and other opportunities. There are no assurances however, that weScoutCam will be successful in obtaining the level of financing needed for ourits operations. If ScoutCam is unsuccessful in commercializing its products and securing sufficient financing, it may need to reduce activities, curtail or even cease operations.

  

Even if we are able to continue to finance our business, the sale of additional equity or debt securities could result in dilution to our current shareholders and could require us to grant a security interest in our assets. If we raise additional funds through the issuance of debt securities, these securities may have rights senior to those of our ordinary shares and could contain covenants that could restrict our operations. In addition, we may require additional capital beyond our currently forecasted amounts to achieve profitability. Any such required additional capital may not be available on reasonable terms, or at all.


We may incur losses as a result of unforeseen or catastrophic events, including the recent outbreak of the coronavirus (COVID-19).

The occurrence of unforeseen or catastrophic events such as terrorist attacks, extreme terrestrial or solar weather events or other natural disasters, emergence of a pandemic, or other widespread health emergencies (or concerns over the possibility of such an emergency), could create economic and financial disruptions, and could lead to operational difficulties that could impair our ability to manage our business. In particular, the current outbreak of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) that was first reported from Wuhan, China, on December 31, 2019, presents concerns that may dramatically affect our ability to conduct our business effectively, including, but not limited to, our inability to attend certain industry-related conferences in and source various materials from the affected region and globally given the current quarantines and travel restrictions in place. The World Health Organization has since classified COVID-19 as a global pandemic. The trajectory of the coronavirus remains uncertain and it is becoming increasingly plausible, notwithstanding the travel restrictions and quarantines already imposed by many countries, that our business, including the livelihood of our employees and customers upon both of which our business relies, may be directly afflicted. We cannot assure you that the COVID-19 pandemic can be eliminated or contained in the near future, or at all, or a similar outbreak will not occur again. If the COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting disruption to our business were to extend over a prolonged period, it could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

 

Since the third quarterOur ability to freely operate our business is limited as a result of 2016 we have been implementing a cost reduction program which may be unsuccessfulcertain covenants included in its execution, and, even if successful, may lead to undesirable outcomes.our Series C Warrants.

SinceThe Series C Warrant Agreement, or the third quarter of 2016 we have been implementing a cost reduction program that has affected the structure and operation of our business. Such plan reflects assumptions and analyses based on our experience and perception of historical trends, current market conditions and expected future developments as well as other factors that we consider appropriate under the circumstances. Whether our cost reduction program will prove successful depends onSeries C Warrant, contains a number of factors,covenants that limit our operating activities, and may prevent our acquisition by a third party, including buta provision setting forth that in the event of a fundamental transaction (other than a fundamental transaction not limited to (i)approved by the our ability to substantially raise additional funding and to obtain adequate liquidity; (ii) our ability to maintain suppliers’board of directors), hospitals’, medical facilities’ and practitioners’ confidence; (iii) our ability to efficiently reduce our operational expenditures, while retaining key employees; and (iv)we or any successor entity may at the overall success of our business. In addition, as long as these cost reduction measurements last, and for a substantialSeries C Warrant holder’s option, exercisable at any time afterwards, our employees may face considerable distraction and uncertainty and we may experience increased levels of employee attrition. A loss of key personnel could have a material adverse effect on our ability to meet operational and financial expectations. The pursuit of additional funding andconcurrently with, or within 30 days after, the applicationconsummation of the cost reduction program has occupied and will continuefundamental transaction, purchase the Series C Warrants from the holder by paying to occupy a substantialthe Series C Warrant holder an amount of cash equal to the Black Scholes value of the remaining unexercised portion of the timeSeries C Warrants on the date of the consummation of such fundamental transaction. These and attentionother similar provisions could delay, prevent or impede an acquisition of us or our management and will impact howmerger with another company, even if such an acquisition or merger would be beneficial to us or to our business is conducted.shareholders.

Risks related to our subsidiary, ScoutCam Inc.’s, ScoutCam Business

 

We have aBecause of its limited operating history, of operating losses and expectScoutCam Inc. may not be able to incur additional losses in the future.successfully operate its business or execute its business plan.

 

We have sustainedIn 2019, we transferred our ScoutCam activity, which has limited operation activity, into a wholly-owned subsidiary, ScoutCam Ltd. On December 26, 2019, we consummated a securities exchange agreement with Intellisense Solutions Inc., under which we received 60% of the issued and outstanding stock of Intellisense Solutions Inc. in consideration for 100% of our holdings in ScoutCam Ltd. Simultaneously with the securities exchange agreement, Intellisense Solutions Inc. raised $3.3 million dollars (gross) based on a post money valuation of $13.3 million dollars. Following the aforementioned transactions, Intellisense Solutions Inc. changed its name to ScoutCam Inc. Given the limited operating history, it is hard to evaluate ScoutCam Inc.’s proposed business and prospects. ScoutCam Inc.’s proposed business operations is subject to numerous risks, uncertainties, expenses and difficulties associated with early-stage enterprises. Such risks include, but are not limited to, the following:

the absence of a lengthy operating history;

insufficient capital to fully realize our operating plan;

expected continual losses for the foreseeable future;

operating in multiple currencies;

our ability to anticipate and adapt to a developing market(s);

acceptance of our ScoutCam by the medical community and consumers;

acceptance of our ScoutCam by the non-medical community and consumers;

limited marketing experience;

a competitive environment characterized by well-established and well-capitalized competitors;

the ability to identify, attract and retain qualified personnel; and

operating in an environment that is highly regulated by a number of agencies.

Furthermore, ScoutCam Inc. has a history of losses, in recent years, whichand may not be able to generate sufficient revenues to achieve and sustain profitability, and as of December 31, 2017, accumulateda result, there is substantial doubt about its ability to $55.9 million, including an operating net loss of $6.1 million and $9.1 million forcontinue as a going concern within the first year following the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. We anticipate that we are likely to continue to incur significant net losses for at least the next several years as we continue the development of the MUSE™ system and potentially other products, expand our sales and marketing capabilities in the endoscopy-based products market, continue our commercialization of our MUSE™ system, expand our adoption and clinical implementation, and continue to develop the corporate infrastructure required to sell and market our products. Our losses have had, and will continue to have, an adverse effect on our shareholders’ equity and working capital. Any failure to achieve and maintain profitability would continue to have an adverse effect on our shareholders’ equity and working capital and could result in a decline in our share price or cause us to cease operations.2019.

 

3

The future success of ourBecause ScoutCam Inc. is subject to these risks, evaluating its business depends on our ability to continue to developmay be difficult, its business strategy may be unsuccessful and obtain regulatory clearances or approvals for innovative and commercially successful products in our field, which weit may be unable to doaddress such risks in a timelycost-effective manner, orif at all. Our success and ability to generate revenue or be profitable also depends on our ability to establish our sales and marketing force, generate product sales and control costs, all of which we may beIf ScoutCam Inc. is unable to do.successfully address these risks, its business and any proceeds derived from it by the Company could be harmed.

The commercial success of the MUSE™ system ScoutCamor any future product, if approved, depends upon the degree of market acceptance by physicians, patients, third-party payors, and others in the medical community.community as well as by other prospect markets and industries.

 

The commercial success of the MUSE™ system and any future product, if approved, depends in part on the medical community, patients, and third-party payors accepting our products as medically useful, cost-effective, and safe. Any product that we bringScoutCam Inc. commissions or brings to the market may or may not gain market acceptance by physicians, patients, third-party payors,prospect customers.

The commercial success of ScoutCam Inc. technologies, commissioned products and othersany future product that it develops depends in part on the medical community. In addition, sincecommunity as well as other industries for various use cases, depending on the MUSETM system isacceptance by such industries of its commissioned products as a therapeutic device being used for a quality of life, benign disease,useful and cost-effective solution compared to current technologies. To date, ScoutCam Inc. has not yet commenced proactive market penetration may be more difficult. To date, we have experienced slower than expected market penetration.in other industries, with the exception of the biomedical sector. If the MUSE™ systemScoutCam Inc.’s technology or any future product if approved,that may be developed does not achieve an adequate level of acceptance, weor does not garner significant commercial appeal, ScoutCam Inc. may not generate significant product revenue and may not become profitable. The degree of market acceptance of these products, if approved for commercial sale, will depend on a number of factors, including:

 

the cost, safety, efficacy, and convenience of the MUSE™ systemScoutCam and any future product in relation to alternative treatments and products; 

 

the ability of third parties to enter into relationships with usScoutCam Inc. without violating their existing agreements; 

 

the effectiveness of ourScoutCam Inc.’s sales and marketing efforts; 

 

the prevalence and severity of any side effects resulting from the procedure; 

the willingness of the target patient population to try new procedures and of physicians to perform new procedures;

the strength of marketing and distribution support for, and timing of market introduction of, competing products; and

 

publicity concerning ourScoutCam Inc.’s products or competing products and treatments; and products.

sufficient third-party insurance coverage or reimbursement.

Even if the MUSE™ system and any future product, if approved, displays a favorable safety and efficacy profile in clinical trials, market acceptance of the product will not be known until after it is launched. OurScoutCam Inc.’s efforts to penetrate industries and educate the medical community and third-party payorsmarketplace on the benefits of theits products may require significant resources and may never be successful. Such efforts to educate the marketplace may require more resources than are required by conventional technologies.

 

Insufficient coverageScoutCam Inc. expects to face significant competition. If it cannot successfully compete with new or reimbursement from medical insurers to users of ourexisting products, could harm our ability to marketits marketing and commercialize our currentsales will suffer and future products.may never be profitable.

ScoutCam Inc. expects to compete against existing technologies and proven products in different industries. In addition, many of these competitors, either alone or together with their collaborative partners, operate larger research and development programs than ScoutCam Inc. does, and have substantially greater financial resources than it does, as well as significantly greater experience in obtaining applicable regulatory approvals applicable to the commercialization of ScoutCam Inc. products.

If ScoutCam Inc. is unable to establish sales, marketing and distribution capabilities or enter into successful relationships with third parties to perform these services, it may not be successful in commercializing our ScoutCam.

Our

ScoutCam Inc. is currently a B2B company, and its business is reliant on its ability to successfully commercialize our products, mainlyattract potential business targets. Furthermore, ScoutCam Inc. has a limited sales and marketing infrastructure and has limited experience in the MUSE™ system, depends significantly onsale, marketing or distribution of its technologies beyond the availability of coverageB2B model. To achieve commercial success for its technologies or any future developed product, it will need to establish a sales and reimbursement for endoscopic procedures from third-party insurers, including governmental programs, as well as private insurance and private health plans. Reimbursement is a significant factor considered by hospitals, medical facilities and practitioners in determining whether to acquire and utilize new capital equipmentmarketing infrastructure or to implement new proceduresout-license such as our technology.future products.

 

In January 2018, the American Medical Association’s, or the AMA’s Current Procedural Terminology, or CPT, published an updated payment for the Category I CPT Code for transoral esophagogastric fundoplasty procedures, which describes procedures conducted with the MUSE™ system. In the U.S., the CPT Editorial Panel assigns specific billing codes for physician servicesfuture, ScoutCam Inc. may consider building a focused sales and outpatient hospital procedures, which are used by providers, who are our customers,marketing infrastructure to bill for procedures. Once a CPT code is established, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, or CMS, in turn establishes payment levels and coverage rules under Medicare, and private payors establish rates and coverage rules. Notwithstanding the issuance of a CPT to report the MUSE procedure and the establishment of payment rates for the code, we cannot guarantee that the MUSE™ system is or will be covered and, if covered, that reimbursement will be sufficient, and furthermore, we cannot guarantee that the MUSE™ system ormarket any future developed products and potentially other product will be approved for coverage or reimbursement by Medicare, Medicaid or any third-party payor. Reimbursement decisions in the European UnionUnited States or elsewhere in the world. Similarly, ScoutCam Inc. may consider evolving its business model in the future and adopting a business-to-consumer approach, or B2C. There are risks involved with establishing its own sales, marketing and distribution capabilities. For example, recruiting and training a sales force could be expensive and time consuming and could delay any product launch. This may be costly, and ScoutCam Inc.’s investment would be lost if it fails to retain or reposition its sales and marketing personnel.

Factors that may inhibit ScoutCam Inc.’s efforts to commercialize its products on its own include:

its inability to recruit, train and retain adequate numbers of effective sales and marketing personnel;

the inability of sales personnel to obtain access to potential customers;

the lack of complementary products to be offered by sales personnel, which may put ScoutCam Inc. at a competitive disadvantage relative to companies with more extensive product lines; and

unforeseen costs and expenses associated with creating an independent sales and marketing organization.

If ScoutCam Inc. is unable to establish its own sales, marketing and distribution capabilities or enter into successful arrangements with third parties to perform these services, its revenues and its profitability may be materially adversely affected.

In addition, ScoutCam Inc. may not be successful in entering into arrangements with third parties to sell, market and distribute its ScoutCamor other jurisdictionsproducts inside or outside of the United States vary by countryor may be unable to do so on terms that are favorable to it. ScoutCam Inc. likely will have little control over such third parties, and regionany of them may fail to devote the necessary resources and there can be no assurance that weattention to sell and market its products effectively. If ScoutCam Inc. does not establish sales, marketing and distribution capabilities successfully, either on its own or in collaboration with third parties, it will not be successful in obtaining adequate reimbursement.

commercializing its product candidates.

4

We depend on the success of a limited portfolio of products for our revenue, which could impair our ability to achieve profitability.

Though we have plans for the development of additional natural orifice surgical products based on our technology, including miniature cameras, flexible stapling and ultrasound, and although we currently derive most of our revenue from the sale of miniature cameras and related imaging equipment, we plan to derive most of our future revenue from product sales of our imaging equipment and our flagship MUSE™ system and its future applications, as well as recurring sales of associated products required to use the MUSE™ system. Our future growth and success is dependent on the successful commercialization of the MUSE™ system. If we are unable to achieve increased commercial acceptance of the MUSE™ system, obtain regulatory clearances or approvals for future products, or experience a decrease in the utilization of our product line or procedure volume, our revenue would be adversely affected. 

We may encounter manufacturing issues during the assembly process of our flagship product.

Due to the characteristics of the technologies on which the main parts of the MUSE™ system are manufactured, which include plastic and metal injection, sheet metals, laser welding and rubber vulcanization, using production tools such as molds, templates and jigs, in the event that parts are found which are inaccurate and/or which have been rendered defective and/or which have failed preliminary tests, we will be forced to repair the manufacturing tools and re-manufacture and/or re-order the parts, a process which will delay the production timetable. Furthermore, in the event that certain parts are not suitable, due to a situation whereby the manufacturing tools have not produced the part in the appropriate manner, it may be necessary to redesign and re-manufacture the manufacturing tool and to manufacture the parts rapidly and at additional cost.

Furthermore, if we are unable to satisfy commercial demand for our MUSE™ system due to our inability to assemble, test and deliver the system in compliance with applicable regulations, our business and financial results, including our ability to generate revenue, would be impaired, market acceptance of our products could be materially, and adversely affected and customers may instead purchase or use competing products.

We may encounter failure in the operation of our products, which may adversely harm patients operated by using our products.

Users of our products may encounter failures in mechanical components, which could result in difficulties in operation or opening or releasing the products, leading to the need for surgical procedures to correct the mechanical failure, in which case, a patients’ medical condition may worsen.

Additionally, in the event that users of our products do not follow the instructions for use or the available product training instructions (which appear on the screen during the performance of the procedure) the foregoing may cause injury and in certain cases, could even cause death. A result of this kind could reduce the rate of progress of, or even prevent, the marketing for the MUSE™ product and our other products.

Furthermore, users of our products may encounter failure in electronic components of our products used in the system software, which could lead to incorrect interpretation by the users or to failure in the operation of the endoscope and to injury to the patient’s critical internal organs. 

We have only limited clinical data to support the value of the MUSE™ system, as well as our other products, which may make patients, physicians and hospitals reluctant to accept or purchase our products.

Physicians, hospitals and patients will only accept or purchase our products if they believe them to be safe and effective, with advantages over competing products or procedures. To date, we have collected only limited clinical data with which to assess our products’ (mainly the MUSE™ system) clinical and economic value. The collection of clinical and economic data and the process of generating peer review publications in support of our products and procedures is an ongoing focus for us.

5

If future publications of clinical studies indicate that medical procedures using the MUSE™ system are less safe or less effective than competing products or procedures, the patients may choose not to undergo our procedure, and physicians or hospitals may choose not to purchase or use our system. Furthermore, unsatisfactory patient outcomes or patient injury could cause negative publicity for our products, particularly in the early phases of product introduction.

Current Hospital economic conditions could delay or prevent our customers from obtaining budgetary approval to purchase a MUSE™ system or other products, which would adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. 

As a result of hospital economic concerns relating to business or financial situations or related to ongoing healthcare reimbursement changes, customers and distributors may be delayed in obtaining, or may not be able to obtain, budgetary approval or financing for their purchases or leases of medical equipment including our products. These delays may in some instances lead to our customers or distributors postponing the shipment and use of previously ordered systems and products, cancelling their orders, or cancelling their agreements with us. An increase in delays and order cancellations of this nature could adversely affect our products sales and revenues and, therefore, harm our business and results of operations.

In addition, worldwide economic conditions or market instability may make it increasingly difficult for us, our customers, our distributors and our suppliers to accurately forecast future product demand trends, which could cause us to order or produce excess products that can increase our inventory carrying costs and result in obsolete inventory. Alternatively, this forecasting difficulty could cause a shortage of products, or materials used in our products, that could result in an inability to satisfy demand for our products and a material loss of potential revenue.

OurScoutCam Inc.’s reliance on third-party suppliers for most of the components of ourits products could harm ourits ability to meet demand for ourits products in a timely and cost effective manner. cost-effective manner, and such dependency can adversely affect its revenue.

 

Though we attemptScoutCam Inc. relies on third-party suppliers for components and depends on obtaining adequate supplies of quality components on a timely basis with favorable terms to ensure the availabilitymanufacture its commissioned products. Some of more than one supplier for each important component in our products, thethose components that are sold by ScoutCam Inc. are provided to it by a limited number of suppliers engagedsuppliers. ScoutCam Inc. will be subject to disruptions in its operations if its sole or limited supply contract manufacturers decrease or stop production of components or do not produce components and products of sufficient quantity. Alternative sources for ScoutCam Inc.’s components will not always be available. Many of its components are manufactured overseas, so they have long lead times, and events such as local disruptions, natural disasters or political conflict may cause unexpected interruptions to the supply of its products or components.

It is ScoutCam Inc.’s intention, to allocate financial resources to improve its inventory management, including establishing an inventory buffer of components appropriate to its business. However, it cannot assure that such attempts will be successful or that product or component shortages will not occur in the provision of miniature video sensors which are suitable for our CMOS technology products is very limited, and therefore in some cases we engage with a single supplier, which may result in dependency on such supplier. This is the case regarding sensors for the CMOS type technology that is produced by a single supplier in the United States. As we do not have a contract in place with this supplier, there is no contractual commitment on the part of such supplier for any set quantity of such sensors. The loss of our sole supplier in providing us with miniature sensors for our CMOS technology products, and our inability or delay in finding a suitable replacement supplier, could significantly affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and reputation.

Modifications to our current regulator-clearedfuture. If ScoutCam Inc. cannot supply commissioned products or the introduction of newfuture potentially developed products may require new regulatory clearances or approvals or require us to recall or cease marketing our current products until clearances or approvals are obtained.

Our MUSE™ system has received marketing clearance from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, based on several 510(k) applications, bears the CE Mark (a mark assigneddue to a product certifying its fulfillmentlack of the Medical Devices Directive of the European Union), as required in ordercomponents, or is unable to market the system in European Union countries and has obtained the necessary license to market the product in Canada, Turkey and Israel.

Ongoing modifications to our products may require new regulatory approvals, as with prior 510k clearances, or require us to recall or cease marketing the modified products until these clearances or approvals are obtained. Any modification to one of our cleared products that would constitute a major change in its intended use, or any change that could significantly affect the safety or effectiveness of the product would require us to obtain a new 510(k) marketing clearance and may even, in some circumstances, require the submission of a premarket approval, or PMA, track application if the change raises complex or novel scientific issues or the product has a new intended use. The FDA requires every manufacturer to make the determination regarding the need for a new 510(k) submission in the first instance, but the FDA may review any manufacturer’s decision. We may make modifications in the future to the MUSE™ system without seeking additional clearances or approvals if we believe such clearances or approvals are not necessary. However, it is possible that the FDA could change existing policy and practices regarding the assessment of whether a new 510(k) clearance is required for changes or modifications to existing devices. Under these changed circumstances, the FDA may disagree with our past or future decisions not to seek a new 510(k) for changes or modifications to existing devices and require new clearances or approvals. In that case, we may be required to recall and stop marketing our products as modified, which could require us to redesign our products, conduct clinical trials to support any modifications, and pay significant regulatory fines or penalties. In addition, the FDA may not approve or clear our products for the indications that are necessary or desirable for successful commercialization or could require additional clinical trials to support any modifications.

6

Significant changes that could be reasonably expected to affect the safety or effectiveness of one of our devices may require us to obtain a license amendment or possibly a new license from Health Canada, Turkey, or Israel. In addition, we have started the process for receiving a regulatory clearance in China by the China Food and Drug Administration, or CFDA, which could be significantly affected by such changes. Substantial changes to the quality system or changes to the CE marked device which could affect compliance with the essential requirements of the device or its intended use must be reported to the Notified Body (an independent and neutral institution appointed to conduct conformity assessment). This may result in a decision that an existing certificate is in valid, an addendum to the certificate is needed or a new certificate must be obtained. Any failure to maintain our existing clearances or approvals, or delay or failure in obtaining required clearances or approvals would adversely affect our ability to introduce new or enhanced productsutilize other components in a timely manner, which in turn would harm ourits business will be significantly harmed. If inventory shortages continue, they could be expected to have a material and adverse effect on ScoutCam Inc.’s future growth. Any of these actions would harm our operating results. Further, we may also be required to seek regulatory clearance in additional countries as we expand our marketing efforts.

Moreover, clearancesrevenues and approvals by the applicable regulator are subject to continual review, and the later discovery of previously unknown problems can result in product labeling restrictions or withdrawal of the product from the market. The loss of previously received approvals or clearances, or the failure to comply with existing or future regulatory requirements could reduce our sales, profitability and future growth prospects.

We are currently required by the FDA to refrain from using certain terms to label and market our products, which could harm our ability to market and commercialize our current or future products.

The FDA’s 510(k) clearances include a specification of a product’s indication for use, and also authorize specific labeling and marketing claims and language in promotional materials for the U.S. market. Failure to conform with the specific cleared labeling of our products or corporate promotional material would be considered mislabeling or off-label promotion which might lead to:

untitled letters, warning letters, fines, injunctions, consent decrees and civil penalties; 

customer notifications, refunds, detention or seizure of our products; 

refusing or delaying requests for 510(k) marketing clearance or PMA approvals of new products or modified products;

withdrawing 510(k) marketing clearances or PMA approvals that have already been granted;

refusing to provide Certificates for Foreign Government;

refusing to grant export approval for our products; or

pursuing criminal prosecution.

7

Any of these sanctions could impair our ability to produce our products in a cost-effective and timely manner in order to meet our customers’ demands. We may also be required to bear other costs or take other actions that may have a negative impact on oureffectively project future sales and financial condition.

If we or our third-party manufacturers or suppliers fail to comply with the FDA’s Quality System Regulation or other regulatory authorities, our manufacturing operations could be interrupted and our product sales and operating results could suffer.results.

 

We and some of our third-party manufacturers and suppliers are required to comply with the FDA’s Quality System Regulation, or QSR, which covers the methods and documentation of the design, testing, production, control, quality assurance, labeling, packaging, sterilization, storage and shipping of our products. We and our manufacturers and suppliers are also subject to the regulations of foreign jurisdictions regarding the manufacturing process if we or our distributors market our products abroad. We monitor our quality management in order to improve our overall level of compliance. Our facilities are subject to periodic and unannounced inspection by U.S. and foreign regulatory agencies, including notified bodies, to audit compliance with the QSR and comparable foreign regulations. If our facilities or those of our third-party manufacturers or suppliers are found to be in violation of applicable laws and regulations, or if we or our manufacturers or suppliers fail to take satisfactory corrective action in response to an adverse inspection, the regulatory authority could take enforcement action, including any of the following sanctions:

untitled letters, warning letters, fines, injunctions, consent decrees and civil penalties;

customer notifications or repair, replacement, refunds, detention or seizure of our products;

operating restrictions or partial suspension or total shutdown of production;

refusing or delaying requests for 510(k) marketing clearance or PMA approvals of new products or modified products;

withdrawing 510(k) marketing clearances that have already been granted, or PMA approvals that we may receive in the future;

refusing to provide Certificates for foreign government;

refusing to grant export approval for our products; or

pursuing criminal prosecution.

Any of these sanctions could impair our ability to produce our products in a cost-effective and timely manner in order to meet our customers’ demands, and could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, results of operations and financial condition. We may also be required to bear other costs or take other actions that may have a negative impact on our future sales and our ability to generate profits.

We face possible competition from the pharmaceutical sector, which could harm our ability to market and commercialize our current and future products.

The development of more powerful drug treatments to assist in the suppression of GERD or other medical problems which compete with our products, may reduce the size of our target markets and may reduce the need for the use of our systems and products, either available now, or which will be developed in the future, thus adversely affecting our ability to market and commercialize our current and future products. While we are unaware of any current pharmaceutical product that could directly compete with the MUSE™ system at this time, there may be new pharmaceutical entrants in the future.

8

There can be no assurance that we will be able to compete successfully against current or future competitors or that competition will not have a material adverse effect on our future revenues and, consequently, on our business, operating results and financial condition.

We face competition from medical device companies that develop and market similar related products and systems, or may launch products in the future, as well as new techniques and devices for treatments performed by our products.

Several medical device companies have commercial products which compete with the MUSE™ system for the treatment of GERD using an endoscopic method. While we believe that the MUSE™ system has several advantages over competing devices, such as the requirement of one operator, inclusion of visualization and ultrasound apparatuses, use of standard titanium staples, and reduced risk of harm to adjacent organs, there can be no assurance that we will be able to compete successfully against current or future competitors or that competition will not have a material adverse effect on our future revenues and, consequently, on our business, operating results and financial condition.

Reporting requirements on payments to physicians in the United States may deter doctors from providing advice to the Company.

The implementation of the reporting and disclosure obligations of the Physician Payment Sunshine Act, which is part of the Affordable Care Act of 2010, or the Sunshine Act, could adversely affect our business.

The Sunshine Act has imposed new reporting and disclosure requirements for drug and device manufacturers with regard to payments or other transfers of value made to certain practitioners (including physicians, dentists and teaching hospitals), and for such manufacturers and for group purchasing organizations with regard to certain ownership interests held by physicians in the reporting entity. On February 1, 2013, the CMS, released the final rule to implement the Sunshine Act. Under this rule, data collection activities began on August 1, 2013, and first disclosure reports were due by March 31, 2014, for the period August 1, 2013, through December 31, 2013. As required under the Sunshine Act, CMS publishes information from these reports on a publicly available website, including amounts transferred and physician, dentist and teaching hospital identities.

The final rule implementing the Sunshine Act is complex, ambiguous, and broad in scope. Accordingly, we are required to collect and report detailed information regarding certain financial relationships we have with U.S. licensed physicians, dentists (if any) and teaching hospitals in the United States. It is difficult to predict how the new requirements may impact existing relationships among manufacturers, distributors, physicians, dentists and teaching hospitals. The Sunshine Act preempts similar state reporting laws, although we, or our subsidiaries, may be required to continue to report under certain of such state laws. While we expect to have substantially compliant programs and controls in place to comply with the Sunshine Act requirements, and we have completed our initial registration with CMS and our 2015 report with respect to Sunshine Act reporting, our continued compliance with the Sunshine Act imposes continuing additional costs on us.

Medical device development is costly and involves continual technological change which may render our current or future products obsolete.

Innovation is rapid and continuous in the medical device industry, and our competitors in the medical device industry make significant investments in research and development. If new products or technologies emerge that provide the same or superior benefits as our products at equal or lower cost, they could render our products obsolete or unmarketable. We must anticipate changes in the marketplace and the direction of technological innovation and customer demands. In addition, we face increasing competition from well-financed medical device companies to develop new technologies and may face competition should we attempt to acquire new technologies, products and businesses. As a result, we cannot be certain that our products will be competitive with current or future products and technologies.

9

WeScoutCam Inc. may be subject to product liability claims, product actions, including product recalls, and other field or regulatory actions that could be expensive, divert management’s attention and harm ourScoutCam Inc. business.

 

OurScoutCam Inc.’s business exposes usit to potential liability risks, product actions and other field or regulatory actions that are inherent in the manufacturing, marketing and sale of medical device products. WeScoutCam Inc. may be held liable if ourits products cause injury or death or is found otherwise unsuitable or defective during usage. The MUSE™ system incorporatesScoutCam Inc.’s products incorporate mechanical and electrical parts, complex computer software and other sophisticated components, any of which can contain errors or failures. Complex computer software is particularly vulnerable to errors and failures, especially when first introduced. In addition, new products or enhancements to ourScoutCam Inc.’s existing products may contain undetected errors or performance problems that, despite testing, are discovered only after installation.

 

If any of ourScoutCam Inc.’s products are defective, whether due to design or manufacturing defects, improper use of the product, or other reasons, weit may voluntarily or involuntarily undertake an action to remove, repair, or replace the product at ourits own expense. In some circumstances, weScoutCam Inc. will be required to notify regulatory authorities of an action pursuant to a product failure.

 

The medical device industry has historically been subjectScoutCam Inc. rely on highly skilled personnel, and, if ScoutCam Inc. is unable to extensive litigation over product liability claims. We anticipate that as part of our ordinary course of business we will be subject to product liability claims alleging defects in the design, manufactureattract, retain or labeling of our products. A product liability claim, regardless of its merit or eventual outcome, could result in significant legal defense costs and high punitive damage payments. Although we maintain product liability insurance, the coveragemotivate qualified personnel, ScoutCam Inc may not be adequateable to cover future claims. Additionally, weoperate its business effectively.

ScoutCam Inc. success depends in large part on continued employment of senior management and key personnel who can effectively operate its business, as well as its ability to attract and retain skilled employees. Competition for highly skilled management, technical, research and development and other employees is intense and ScoutCam Inc. may not be unableable to maintain our existing product liability insuranceattract or retain highly qualified personnel in the future at satisfactory ratesfuture. In making employment decisions, particularly in the job candidates often consider the value of the equity awards they would receive in connection with their employment. ScoutCam Inc. long-term incentive programs may not be attractive enough or adequate amounts.

Broad-based domestic and international government initiativesperform sufficiently to reduce spending, particularly those related to healthcare costs, may reduce reimbursement rates for endoscopic procedures, which will reduce the cost-effectiveness of our products.attract or retain qualified personnel.

 

Healthcare reforms, changes in healthcare policiesIf any of ScoutCam Inc.’s employees leaves ScoutCam Inc., and changesScoutCam Inc. fails to third-party coverageeffectively manage a transition to new personnel, or if ScoutCam Inc. fails to attract and reimbursements, including legislation enacted reforming the U.S. healthcare system,retain qualified and any future changes to such legislation, may affect demand for our products and may have a material adverse effectexperienced professionals on our financial condition and results of operations. There can be no assurance that current levels of reimbursement will not be decreased in the future, or that future legislation, regulation, or reimbursement policies of third-parties will not adversely affect the demand for our products or our ability to sell products on a profitable basis. The adoption of significant changes to the healthcare system in the United States, Europe or other jurisdictions in which we may market our products, could limit the prices we are able to charge for our products or the amounts of reimbursement available for our products, could limit the acceptance and availability of our products, reduce medical procedure volumes and increase operational and other costs. For example, U.S. President Donald Trump has recently publicly indicated an intent to lower healthcare costs through various potential initiatives. In addition, President Trump and other U.S. lawmakers have made statements about potentially repealing or replacing the Affordable Care Act, although specific legislation for such a repeal or replacement is still in its early stages. While we are unable to predict what changes may ultimately be enacted, to the extent that future changes affect how our products are paid for and reimbursed by government and private payers our business could be adversely impacted.

We cannot predict whether future healthcare initiatives will be implemented at the federal or state level or internationally, or the effect that any future legislation or regulation will have on us. The expansion of government’s role in any country’s healthcare industry may result in decreased profits to us, lower reimbursements by third-parties for procedures in which our products are used, and reduced medical procedure volumes, all of which may adversely affect ouracceptable terms, ScoutCam Inc. business, financial condition and results of operations.operations could be adversely affected.

ScoutCam Inc. success also depends on having highly trained financial, technical, recruiting, sales and marketing personnel. ScoutCam Inc. will need to continue to hire additional personnel as ScoutCam Inc. business grows. A shortage in the number of people with these skills or ScoutCam Inc.’s failure to attract them could impede ScoutCam Inc.’s ability to increase revenues from its existing technology and services, ensure full compliance with international and federal regulations, or launch new product offerings and would have an adverse effect on ScoutCam Inc.’s business and financial results.

ScoutCam Inc. may not be able to obtain patents or other intellectual property rights necessary to protect its proprietary technology and business.

ScoutCam Inc. may seek to patent concepts, components, processes, designs and methods, and other inventions and technologies that it considers to have commercial value or that will likely give it a technological advantage. Despite devoting resources to the research and development of proprietary technology, ScoutCam Inc. may not be able to develop technology that is patentable or protectable. Patents may not be issued in connection with pending patent applications, and claims allowed may not be sufficient to allow them to use the inventions that they create exclusively. Furthermore, any patents issued could be challenged, re-examined, held invalid or unenforceable or circumvented and may not provide sufficient protection or a competitive advantage. In addition, despite efforts to protect and maintain patents, competitors and other third parties may be able to design around their patents or develop products similar to ScoutCam Inc. work products that are not within the scope of their patents. Finally, patents provide certain statutory protection only for a limited period of time that varies depending on the jurisdiction and type of patent.


Prosecution and protection of the rights sought in patent applications and patents can be costly and uncertain, often involve complex legal and factual issues and consume significant time and resources. In addition, the breadth of claims allowed in its patents, their enforceability and its ability to protect and maintain them cannot be predicted with any certainty. The laws of certain countries may not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States. Even if ScoutCam Inc.’s patents are held to be valid and enforceable in a certain jurisdiction, any legal proceedings that it may initiate against third parties to enforce such patents will likely be expensive, take significant time and divert management’s attention from other business matters. ScoutCam Inc. cannot assure that any of its issued patents or pending patent applications provide any protectable, maintainable or enforceable rights or competitive advantages to it.

In addition to patents, ScoutCam Inc. will rely on a combination of copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets and other related laws and confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions to protect, maintain and enforce its proprietary technology and intellectual property rights in the United States and other countries. However, its ability to protect its brands by registering certain trademarks may be limited. In addition, while it will generally enter into confidentiality and nondisclosure agreements with its employees, consultants, contract manufacturers, distributors and resellers and with others to attempt to limit access to and distribution of its proprietary and confidential information, it is possible that:

misappropriation of its proprietary and confidential information, including technology, will nevertheless occur;
ScoutCam Inc.’s confidentiality agreements will not be honored or may be rendered unenforceable;
third parties will independently develop equivalent, superior or competitive technology or products;
disputes will arise with its current or future strategic licensees, customers or others concerning the ownership, validity, enforceability, use, patentability or registrability of its intellectual property; or
unauthorized disclosure of ScoutCam Inc.’s know-how, trade secrets or other proprietary or confidential information will occur.

ScoutCam Inc. cannot assure that it will be successful in protecting, maintaining or enforcing its intellectual property rights. If ScoutCam Inc. is unsuccessful in protecting, maintaining or enforcing its intellectual property rights, then its business, operating results and financial condition could be materially adversely affected, which could:

adversely affect ScoutCam Inc.’s reputation with customers;
be time-consuming and expensive to evaluate and defend;
cause product shipment delays or stoppages;
divert management’s attention and resources;
subject ScoutCam Inc. to significant liabilities and damages;
require ScoutCam Inc. to enter into royalty or licensing agreements; or
require ScoutCam Inc. to cease certain activities, including the sale of products.

If it is determined that ScoutCam Inc. has infringed, violated or is infringing or violating a patent or other intellectual property right of any other person or if it is found liable in respect of any other related claim, then, in addition to being liable for potentially substantial damages, ScoutCam Inc. may be prohibited from developing, using, distributing, selling or commercializing certain of its technologies unless it obtains a license from the holder of the patent or other intellectual property right. ScoutCam Inc. cannot assure that it will be able to obtain any such license on a timely basis or on commercially favorable terms, or that any such licenses will be available, or that workarounds will be feasible and cost-efficient. If ScoutCam Inc. do not obtain such a license or find a cost-efficient workaround, its business, operating results and financial condition could be materially adversely affected and it could be required to cease related business operations in some markets and restructure ScoutCam Inc. business to focus on its continuing operations in other markets.


Risks related to our MUSE Technology Business

 

We depend on key employees, and ifare currently proposing our MUSEsystem business for sale or grant of license. If we failare unable to attract and retain employees withsell or license our MUSEbusiness or unable to sell or license it in terms acceptable to us, we will have to write off our investment in the expertise required forMUSEsystem, which will adversely affect our business and provide for the succession of senior management, we cannot grow or achieve profitability.business.

 

We are dependent on the continued service and performance of members ofcurrently proposing our senior management and other key personnel,MUSE system business for example our Chief Executive Officer, Chris Rowland. We do not maintain key-man life insurance. Our future success will depend in part on our ability to retain our management and scientific teams, to identify, hire and retain additional qualified personnel with expertise in research and development and sales and marketing, and to effectively provide for the succession of senior management. Competition for qualified personnel in the medical device industry is intense. We may be unable to replace key persons if they leavesale or to fill new positions requiring key persons with appropriate experience.

10

The loss of key employees, the failure of any key employee to perform or our inability to attract and retain skilled employees, as needed, or an inability to effectively plan for and implement a succession plan for key employees could harm our business.

license. If we or our contractors or service providers fail to comply with regulatory laws and regulations, we or they could be subject to regulatory actions, which could affect our ability to develop, market and sell our products and any other or future products that we may develop and may harm our reputation.

If we or our manufacturers or other third-party contractors fail to comply with applicable federal, state or foreign laws or regulations, including with respect to healthcare and data privacy, we could be subject to regulatory actions, which could affect our ability to develop, market and sell our current products or any future products which we may develop in the future and could harm our reputation and lead to reduced demand for or non-acceptance of our proposed products by the market.

If our employees commit fraud or other misconduct, including noncompliance with regulatory standards and requirements and insider trading, our business may experience serious adverse consequences.

We are exposed to the risk of employee fraud or other misconduct. Misconduct by employees could include intentional failures to comply with FDA regulations, to provide accurate information to the FDA, to comply with manufacturing standards we have established, to comply with federal and state health-care fraud and abuse laws and regulations, to report financial information or data accurately or to disclose unauthorized activities to us. In particular, sales, marketing and business arrangements in the healthcare industry are subject to extensive laws and regulations intended to prevent fraud, kickbacks, self-dealing and other abusive practices. These laws and regulations may restrict or prohibit a wide range of pricing, discounting, marketing and promotion, sales commission, customer incentive programs and other business arrangements. Employee misconduct could also involve the improper use of information obtained in the course of clinical trials, which could result in regulatory sanctions and serious harm to our reputation.

Our board of directors adopted a Code of Ethics in March 2016. However, it is not always possible to identify and deter employee misconduct, and the precautions we take to detect and prevent this activity may not be effective in controlling unknown or unmanaged risks or losses or in protecting us from governmental investigations or other actions or lawsuits stemming from a failure to be in compliance with such laws or regulations. If any such actions are instituted against us, and we are not successful in defending ourselves or asserting our rights, those actions could have a significant impact on our business, including the imposition of significant fines or other sanctions.

In addition, during the course of our operations, our directors, executives and employees may have access to material, nonpublic information regarding our business, our results of operations or potential transactions we are considering. If a director, executive or employee was to be investigated, or an action was to be brought against a director, executive or employee for insider trading, it could have a negative impact on our reputation and the market price of our securities. Such a claim, with or without merit, could also result in substantial expenditures of time and money, and divert attention of our management team from other tasks important to the success of our business.

If we fail to withhold our position against the Israeli tax authorities in connection with tax withholding, we may be required to pay additional taxes.

Following a tax deduction assessment conducted by the Israeli Tax Authorities, or the ITA, in October 2016, as of March 15, 2018, we are deemed to be in debt of approximately $0.8 million of additional withholding taxes, including penalties and interest. It is our management’s opinion, based on the assessment of our legal counsel, that the chances of the claims of the ITA being dismissed are more likely than not. Therefore, no allowance regarding this assessment was recorded in our financial statements. However, if our position is not accepted in the event this case is litigated, our business can be materially adversely affected.

Disruptions to our information technology systems due to cyber-attacks or our failure to upgrade and adjust our information technology systems, may materially impair our operations, hinder our growth and materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.

We believe that an appropriate information technology, or IT, infrastructure is important in order to support our daily operations and the growth of our business. If we experience difficulties in implementing new or upgraded information systems or experience significant system failures, or if we are unable to successfully modifysell or license our management information systemsMUSE™ business or respondunable to changessell or license it in our business needs,terms acceptable to us, we maycould not be able to effectively manage our business,derive any value from the sale and we may fail to meet our reporting obligations. Additionally, if our current back-up storage arrangements and our disaster recovery plan are not operated as planned, we may not be able to effectively recover our information systemwill lose significant cash flow, which, in the event of a crisis, which may materially andturn, will adversely affect our business and results of operations.financial results.

 

Several factors may delay or prevent us from selling or granting license to our MUSEsystem business:

potential purchasers’ or licenseeperception on the cost, safety, efficacy, and convenience of the MUSEsystem in relation to alternative treatments and products;

publicity concerning our products, including MUSE, or competing products and treatments;

patients suffering from adverse events while using the MUSEsystem; and

competition from the pharmaceutical sector, which could harm the ability to market and commercialize the MUSEsystem and, as a result, impact the attractiveness of the MUSEsystem in the eyes of potential purchasers.

Further, we have only limited clinical data to support the value of the MUSEsystem, which may make patients, physicians and hospitals reluctant to accept or purchase our products, and as such a potential purchaser may be reluctant to purchase our MUSE business or such lack of data will be reflected in the purchase price.

Moreover, various modifications to our MUSE system regulator-cleared products may require new regulatory clearances or approvals or require a recall or cease marketing of the MUSE system until clearances or approvals are obtained. Clearances and approvals by the applicable regulator are subject to continual review, and the later discovery of previously unknown problems can result in product labeling restrictions or withdrawal of the product from the market. The potential loss of previously received approvals or clearances, or the failure to comply with existing or future regulatory requirements could reduce the potential sales, profitability and future growth prospects of the MUSE.

We have entered into a Licensing and Sale Agreement with Shanghai Golden Grand-Medical Instruments Ltd. (Golden Grand) for the know-how licensing and sale of good relating to the Medigus Ultrasonic Surgical Endostapler (MUSE) system in China with a substantial amount of the consideration subject to milestone achievements.

We entered into a Licensing and Sale Agreement with Shanghai Golden Grand-Medical Instruments Ltd. (Golden Grand) for the know-how licensing and sale of good relating to the Medigus Ultrasonic Surgical Endostapler (MUSE) system in China, Hong Kong, Taiwan and Macao. The payment of a substantial amount of the consideration is contingent on achievement of certain milestones such as establishing a MUSE assembly line in China. In the current environment, thereevent that we are numerousnot able to meet such milestones, due to various factors including natural disasters, public health crises, political crises and evolving riskstrade wars which are not under our control, our entitlement to cybersecuritythe aggregate consideration under the agreement may be impaired.

Specifically, in December 2019, a strain of coronavirus (known as COVID-19) was reported to have surfaced in Wuhan, China, resulting in widespread measures with the goal of containing the virus. The World Health Organization has since declared a global emergency and privacy, including criminal hackers, hacktivists, state-sponsored intrusions, industrial espionage, employee malfeasance and human or technological error. High-profile security breaches at other companies and in government agencies have increased in recent years, and security industry experts and government officials have warned aboutclassified the riskscoronavirus as a global pandemic, due to the spread of hackers and cyber-attacks targeting businesses such as ours. Computer hackers and others routinely attempt to breach the security of technology products, services and systems, and to fraudulently induce employees, customers, or others to disclose information or unwittingly providevirus. As a result, our personnel’s access to systems or data. We can provide no assurance thatthe China, our current IT system or any updates or upgrades theretoability to transport the materials and equipment required in order to set up our MUSE assembly line is severely limited. To the current or future IT systems of our distributors use orextent the coronavirus outbreak persists, it may use in the future, are fully protected against third-party intrusions, viruses, hacker attacks, information or data theft or other similar threats. Legislative or regulatory action in these areas is also evolving, and we may be unable to adapt our IT systems or to manage the IT systems of third parties to accommodate these changes. We have experienced and expect to continue to experience actual or attempted cyber-attacks of our IT networks. Although none of these actual or attempted cyber-attacks has had a materialan adverse impact on our operations or financial condition, we cannot guarantee that any such incidents will not have such an impact in the future.

revenues associated with MUSE.

11

Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property

 

If we are unable to secure and maintain patent or other intellectual property protection for the intellectual property used in our products, our ability to compete will be harmed.

 

Our commercial success depends, in part, on obtaining and maintaining patent and other intellectual property protection for the technologies used in our products. The patent positions of medical device companies, including ours, can be highly uncertain and involve complex and evolving legal and factual questions. Furthermore, we might in the future opt to license intellectual property from other parties. If we, or the other parties from whom we may license intellectual property, fail to obtain and maintain adequate patent or other intellectual property protection for intellectual property used in our products, or if any protection is reduced or eliminated, others could use the intellectual property used in our products, resulting in harm to our competitive business position. In addition, patent and other intellectual property protection may not provide us with a competitive advantage against competitors that devise ways of making competitive products without infringing any patents that we own or have rights to.

 

U.S. patents and patent applications may be subject to interference proceedings, and U.S. patents may be subject to re-examination proceedings in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Foreign patents may be subject to opposition or comparable proceedings in the corresponding foreign patent offices. Any of these proceedings could result in loss of the patent or denial of the patent application, or loss or reduction in the scope of one or more of the claims of the patent or patent application. Changes in either patent laws or in interpretations of patent laws may also diminish the value of our intellectual property or narrow the scope of our protection. Interference, re-examination and opposition proceedings may be costly and time consuming, and we, or the other parties from whom we might potentially license intellectual property, may be unsuccessful in defending against such proceedings. Thus, any patents that we own or might license may provide limited or no protection against competitors. In addition, our pending patent applications and those we may file in the future may have claims narrowed during prosecution or may not result in patents being issued. Even if any of our pending or future applications are issued, they may not provide us with adequate protection or any competitive advantages. Our ability to develop additional patentable technology is also uncertain. 

 

Non-payment or delay in payment of patent fees or annuities, whether intentional or unintentional, may also result in the loss of patents or patent rights important to our business. Many countries, including certain countries in Europe, have compulsory licensing laws under which a patent owner may be compelled to grant licenses to other parties. In addition, many countries limit the enforceability of patents against other parties, including government agencies or government contractors. In these countries, the patent owner may have limited remedies, which could materially diminish the value of the patent. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States, particularly in the field of medical products and procedures.

 

If we are unable to prevent unauthorized use or disclosure of our proprietary trade secrets and unpatented know-how, our ability to compete will be harmed.

 

Proprietary trade secrets, copyrights, trademarks and unpatented know-how are also very important to our business. We rely on a combination of trade secrets, copyrights, trademarks, confidentiality agreements and other contractual provisions and technical security measures to protect certain aspects of our technology, especially where we do not believe that patent protection is appropriate or obtainable. We require our office holders, employees, consultants and distributers of our products and most third parties (such as contractors or clinical collaborators) to execute confidentiality agreements in connection with their relationships with us. However, these measures may not be adequate to safeguard our proprietary intellectual property and conflicts may, nonetheless, arise regarding ownership of inventions. Such conflicts may lead to the loss or impairment of our intellectual property or to expensive litigation to defend our rights against competitors who may be better funded and have superior resources. Our office holders, employees, consultants and other advisors may unintentionally or willfully disclose our confidential information to competitors. In addition, confidentiality agreements may be unenforceable or may not provide an adequate remedy in the event of unauthorized disclosure. Enforcing a claim that a third party illegally obtained and is using our trade secrets is expensive and time consuming, and the outcome is unpredictable. Moreover, our competitors may independently develop equivalent knowledge, methods and know-how. Unauthorized parties may also attempt to copy or reverse engineer certain aspects of our products that we consider proprietary. As a result, other parties may be able to use our proprietary technology or information, and our ability to compete in the market would be harmed.

12

We could become subject to patent and other intellectual property litigation that could be costly, result in the diversion of management’s attention, require us to pay damages and force us to discontinue selling our products.

 

Our industry is characterized by competing intellectual property and a substantial amount of litigation over patent and other intellectual property rights. Determining whether a product infringes a patent involves complex legal and factual issues, and the outcome of a patent litigation action is often uncertain. No assurance can be given that patents containing claims covering our products, parts of our products, technology or methods do not exist, have not been filed or could not be filed or issued. Furthermore, our competitors or other parties may assert that our products and the methods we employ in the use of our products are covered by U.S. or foreign patents held by them. In addition, because patent applications can take many years to issue and because publication schedules for pending applications vary by jurisdiction, there may be applications now pending of which we are unaware and which may result in issued patents which our current or future products infringe. Also, because the claims of published patent applications can change between publication and patent grant, there may be published patent applications with claims that we infringe. There could also be existing patents that one or more of our products or parts may infringe and of which we are unaware. As the number of competitors in the endoscopic procedure market grows, and as the number of patents issued in this area grows, the possibility of patent infringement claims against us increases.

 

Infringement actions and other intellectual property claims and proceedings brought against or by us, whether with or without merit, may cause us to incur substantial costs and could place a significant strain on our financial resources, divert the attention of management from our business and harm our reputation. Some of our competitors may be able to sustain the costs of complex patent or intellectual property litigation more effectively than we can because they have substantially greater resources

 

We cannot be certain that we will successfully defend against allegations of infringement of patents and intellectual property rights of others. In the event that we become subject to a patent infringement or other intellectual property lawsuit and if the other party’s patents or other intellectual property were upheld as valid and enforceable and we were found to infringe the other party’s patents or violate the terms of a license to which we are a party, we could be required to pay damages. We could also be prevented from selling our products unless we could obtain a license to use technology or processes covered by such patents or will be able to redesign the product to avoid infringement. A license may not be available at all or on commercially reasonable terms or we may not be able to redesign our products to avoid infringement. Modification of our products or development of new products could require us to conduct clinical trials and to revise our filings with the applicable regulatory bodies, which would be time consuming and expensive. In these circumstances, we may be unable to sell our products at competitive prices or at all, our business and operating results could be harmed.

 

We may be subject to claims that our employees, consultants, or independent contractors have wrongfully used or disclosed confidential information of third parties or, that our employees have wrongfully used or disclosed alleged trade secrets of their former employers.

 

Certain of our employees and personnel were previously employed at universities, medical institutions, or other biotechnology or pharmaceutical companies. Although we try to ensure that our employees, consultants, and independent contractors do not use the proprietary information or know-how of others in their work for us, we may be subject to claims that we or our employees, consultants, or independent contractors have inadvertently or otherwise used or disclosed intellectual property, including trade secrets or other proprietary information, of any of our employee’s former employer or other third parties. Litigation may be necessary to defend against these claims. If we fail in defending any such claims, in addition to paying monetary damages, we may lose valuable intellectual property rights or personnel. Even if we are successful in defending against such claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and be a distraction to management and other employees. Furthermore, universities or medical institutions who employ some of our key employees and personnel in parallel to their engagement by us may claim that intellectual property developed by such person is owned by the respective academic or medical institution under the respective institution intellectual property policy or applicable law.


We may be subject to claims challenging the inventorship or ownership of our patents and other intellectual property.

 

We may be subject to claims that former employees, collaborators, or other third parties have an ownership interest in our patents or other intellectual property. Ownership disputes may arise in the future, for example, from conflicting obligations of consultants or others who are involved in developing our product candidates. Litigation may be necessary to defend against these and other claims challenging inventorship or ownership. If we fail in defending any such claims, in addition to paying monetary damages, we may lose valuable intellectual property rights, such as exclusive ownership of, or right to use, valuable intellectual property. Such an outcome could have a material adverse effect on our business. Even if we are successful in defending against such claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and be a distraction to management and other employees. 

 

Disruptions to our information technology systems due to cyber-attacks or our failure to upgrade and adjust our information technology systems, may materially impair our operations, hinder our growth and materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.

We believe that an appropriate information technology, or IT, infrastructure is important in order to support our daily operations and the growth of our business. If we experience difficulties in implementing new or upgraded information systems or experience significant system failures, or if we are unable to successfully modify our management information systems or respond to changes in our business needs, we may not be able to effectively manage our business, and we may fail to meet our reporting obligations. Additionally, if our current back-up storage arrangements and our disaster recovery plan are not operated as planned, we may not be able to effectively recover our information system in the event of a crisis, which may materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.

In the current environment, there are numerous and evolving risks to cybersecurity and privacy, including criminal hackers, hacktivists, state-sponsored intrusions, industrial espionage, employee malfeasance and human or technological error. High-profile security breaches at other companies and in government agencies have increased in recent years, and security industry experts and government officials have warned about the risks of hackers and cyber-attacks targeting businesses such as ours. Computer hackers and others routinely attempt to breach the security of technology products, services and systems, and to fraudulently induce employees, customers, or others to disclose information or unwittingly provide access to systems or data. We can provide no assurance that our current IT system or any updates or upgrades thereto and the current or future IT systems of our distributors use or may use in the future, are fully protected against third-party intrusions, viruses, hacker attacks, information or data theft or other similar threats. Legislative or regulatory action in these areas is also evolving, and we may be unable to adapt our IT systems or to manage the IT systems of third parties to accommodate these changes. We have experienced and expect to continue to experience actual or attempted cyber-attacks of our IT networks. Although none of these actual or attempted cyber-attacks has had a material adverse impact on our operations or financial condition, we cannot guarantee that any such incidents will not have such an impact in the future.

We have entered into agreements relating to our products and intellectual property with distributors and companies which have business operations outside the U.S which include rights to develop and improve our intellectual property.

In that past, we have entered into distribution agreements with various international distributers for the sale of our MUSEproducts in locations such as Italy, Turkey Switzerland and the United States. Although to date we have terminated the distributor agreements to which we were party, during the terms of such agreements we provided our distributors with our solutions and products and are therefore exposed to risk of reverse engineering and theft of intellectual property. To date, we are not aware of any such theft or infringement. If such a theft or infringement we’re to occur, we cannot be sure that the intellectual property laws applicable in our former distributors’ geographies would provide us with sufficient remedies.

In addition, we have transferred some of our intellectual property to our indirect subsidiary ScoutCam Ltd. and have received a license back with respect to such patents for the purpose of developing, marketing and sale our MUSE technology. Furthermore, we are currently party to patent license agreements with ScoutCam Ltd. which grants ScoutCam Ltd. rights to further develop and improve on such patents. We believe that the current arrangements with ScoutCam Ltd. are governed by reasonable terms which provide us with sufficient freedom to conduct our business, however we cannot guarantee that such freedom shall persist.

13

 

Risks RelatedRegulatory reforms may adversely affect our ability to Regulatory Compliancesell our products profitably.

From time to time, legislation is drafted and introduced in the United States, European Union or other countries in which we operate, that could significantly change the statutory provisions governing the clearance or approval, manufacture and marketing of our products, including in the medical devices industry. In addition, regulations and guidance may often be revised or reinterpreted by the regulatory authorities in ways that may significantly affect our business and our products. It is impossible to predict whether legislative changes will be enacted or interpretations changed, and what the impact of such changes, if any, may be.

 

If we fail to comply with the extensive government regulations relating to our business, we may be subject to fines, injunctions and other penalties that could harm our business.

OurThe application of our MUSE system as a medical device products and operations areis subject to extensive regulation by the FDA, pursuant to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, or FDCA, and various other federal, state and foreign governmental authorities. Government regulations and requirements specific to medical devices are wide ranging and govern, among other things:

 

design, development and manufacturing;

 

testing, labeling and storage;

 

clinical trials;

  

product safety;

  

marketing, sales and distribution;

  

premarket clearance or approval;

  

record keeping procedures;

  

advertising and promotions; and

  

product recalls and field corrective actions.

For the purpose of receiving FDA clearance through the 510(k) track, the applicant must prove, inter alia, that the device subject to the application is substantially equivalent to one or more products which have already been approved by the FDA (predicate device). Additionally, the applicant is required to provide a detailed description of the device, including specifications and technical information, labeling, instructions for use, and the relevant indications for use of the device which is the subject of the application.

Clinical trials are usually not required under the 510(k) track, unless the FDA suspects the device subject to application contains new technical characteristics requiring clinical results regarding safety and efficacy. Clinical trials whose results are attached to the application for marketing approval are subject to advance approval by the FDA regarding the protocol of the trial of the Investigative Device Exemption (IDE) type.

Approval for marketing of medical devices in the United States can be submitted through a PMA, which is required when the device subject to approval is not substantially equivalent to a previously approved device, particularly high risk life-saving devices.

14

Though the PMA track consists of more stringent requirements than the 510(k) track and can be expensive and lengthy and entail significant fees, unless exempt. The FDA’s 510(k) marketing clearance process usually takes from three to 12 months, but it can last longer. The process of obtaining PMA approval is more expensive and uncertain than the 510(k) marketing clearance process. It generally takes from one to three years, or even longer, from the time the PMA application is submitted to the FDA, until an approval is obtained. There is no assurance that we will be able to obtain FDA clearance or approval for any new products on a timely basis, or at all.

In addition, weWe are subject to annual regulatory audits in order to maintain our quality system certifications, CE mark permissions, FDA Clearance and Canadian medical device license. We do not know whether we will be able to continue to affix the CE mark for new or modified products or that we will continue to meet the quality and safety standards required to maintain the permissions and license we have already received. If we are unable to maintain our quality system certifications and permission to affix the CE mark to our products, we will no longer be able to sell our products in member countries of the European Union or other areas of the world that require CE’s or FDA’s approval of medical devices. If we are unable to maintain our quality system certifications and Canadian medical device license, we will not be able to sell our products in Canada.

 

Our medical device products and operations are also subject to regulation by the Medical Devices and Accessories Division in the Israeli Ministry of Health, or AMAR, which is responsible for the registration of medical devices in Israel, issuance of import licenses and monitoring marketing of medical equipment. We have received an AMAR approval in Israel. If we fail to comply with the extensive government regulations relating to our business, we may be subject to fines, injunctions and other penalties that could harm our business.

 

Failure to obtain regulatory approval in additional foreign jurisdictions will prevent us from expanding the commercialization of our products.

To be able to market and sell our products in most other countries, we must obtain regulatory approvals and comply with the regulations of those countries. These regulations, including the requirements for approvals and the time required for regulatory review, vary from country to country. Obtaining and maintaining foreign regulatory approvals are expensive and time consuming, and we cannot be certain that we will receive regulatory approvals in the various countries in which we plan to market our products. Failure to obtain or maintain regulatory approval in such countries could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Our products may be subject to product actions in the future that could harm our reputation, business operations and financial results.

The FDA and similar foreign health or governmental authorities have the authority to require an involuntary recall of commercialized products in the event of material deficiencies or defects in design, or manufacturing or labeling. In the case of the FDA, the authority to require a recall must be based on an FDA finding. In addition, foreign governmental bodies have the authority to require a recall of our products in the event of material deficiencies or defects in design or manufacture. Product actions involving any of our products would divert managerial and financial resources and have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

If our products, or malfunction of our products, cause or contribute to adverse medical events such as death or a serious injury, we are required to report to the FDA, and if we fail to do so, we would be subject to sanctions that would materially harm our business.

Our marketed products are subject to Medical Device Reporting, or MDR, obligations, which require that we report to the FDA any incident in which our products may have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury, or in which our products malfunctioned and, if the malfunction were to recur, it could likely cause or contribute to a death or serious injury. The timing of our obligation to report under the MDR regulations is triggered by the date we become aware of the adverse event as well as the nature of the event. We may fail to report adverse events of which we become aware within the prescribed timeframe. We may also fail to recognize that we have become aware of a reportable adverse event, especially if it is not reported to us as an adverse event or if it is an adverse event that is unexpected.In addition, all manufacturers placing medical devices in the European Union, Israel and Canada markets are legally bound to report any serious or potentially serious incidents involving devices they produce or sell to the relevant authority in whose jurisdiction the incidentoccurred.

15

If we fail to comply with our reporting obligations, the FDA or other agencies in whose jurisdiction the incident occurred, could take action including warning letters, untitled letters, administrative actions, criminal prosecution, imposition of civil monetary penalties, revocation of our device clearances, seizure of our products, or delay in clearance of future products. Any correctiveaction, whether voluntary or involuntary, as well as defending ourselves in a lawsuit, will require the dedication of our time and capital, distract management from operating our business, and may materially harm our reputation and financial results.

We may be subject to fines, penalties or injunctions if we promote the use of our products for unapproved uses, resulting in damage to our reputation and business.

Our promotional materials and training methods must comply with FDA and other applicable laws and regulations, including the prohibition of the promotion of a medical device for a use that has not been cleared or approved by FDA. Use of a device outside its cleared or approved indications is known as “off-label” use. We are not allowed to promote the MUSETM system for off label use. If the FDA determines that we promote an off-label use, it could request that we modify our promotional materials or subject us to regulatory or enforcement actions, which could have an adverse impact on our reputation and financial results. Similarly, a CE mark and an AMAR approval is invalidated if any part of the device is modified or used in a manner that is outside of its intended use.

Regulatory reforms may adversely affect our ability to sell our products profitably.

From time to time, legislation is drafted and introduced in the United States, European Union or other countries in which we operate, that could significantly change the statutory provisions governing the clearance or approval, manufacture and marketing of medical devices. In addition, regulations and guidance may often be revised or reinterpreted by the regulatory authorities in ways that may significantly affect our business and our products. It is impossible to predict whether legislative changes will be enacted or interpretations changed, and what the impact of such changes, if any, may be.

On September 24, 2013, the FDA published a final rule establishing a unique device identification system, or the UDI Rule. The UDI Rule mandates new labeling requirements that will impact our medical products. We will be required to meet compliance dates as early as September 24, 2015 for implantable devices (such as staples and cartridges), and additional compliance dates of September 24, 2016 and September 24, 2018 for all other Class II (such as staplers) and reusable components (such as consoles), respectively. Compliance may involve increases costs and require new equipment, quality systems and manufacturing processes. As of the date of this annual report on Form 20-F, we are on schedule with the UDI Rule compliance.

If we fail to comply with federal or state fraud and abuse laws, we could be subject to criminal and civil penalties, loss of licenses and exclusion from Medicare, Medicaid and other federal and state healthcare programs which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

There are numerous United States federal and state laws pertaining to healthcare fraud and abuse, including anti-kickback laws, false claims, and physician transparency laws. Section 1128B(b) of the Social Security Act, or the SSA, commonly referred to as the “Anti-Kickback Statute”, prohibits the offer, payment, solicitation or receipt of any form of remuneration in return for referring, ordering, leasing, purchasing or arranging for or recommending the ordering, purchasing or leasing of items or services payable by the Medicare and Medicaid programs or any other federally funded healthcare program. The Anti-Kickback Statute is very broad in scope, and many of its provisions have not been uniformly or definitively interpreted by courts or regulations. We have consulting or fee for services arrangements with physicians, hospitals and other entities, which may be subject to scrutiny. To the extent we are found to not be in compliance, we could face potentially significant fines and penalties in addition to other more significant sanctions and we may be required to restructure our operations.

Another development affecting the healthcare industry is the increased use of the federal Civil False Claims Act and, in particular, actions brought pursuant to the False Claims Act’s “whistleblower” or “qui tam” provisions. The False Claims Act imposes liability on any person or entity that, among other things, knowingly presents, or causes to be presented, a false or fraudulent claim for payment by a federal healthcare program. The qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act allow a private individual to bring actions on behalf of the federal government alleging that the defendant has submitted a false claim to the federal government, and to share in any monetary recovery. In recent years, the number of suits brought against healthcare providers by private individuals has increased dramatically. In addition, various states have enacted false claim laws analogous to the Civil False Claims Act.

16

The federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, or HIPAA, as amended, created two new federal crimes: healthcare fraud and false statements relating to healthcare matters. Violations can result in criminal and civil liabilities.

Compliance with complex foreign and U.S. laws and regulations that apply to our international operations increases our cost of doing business in international jurisdictions and could expose us or our employees to fines and penalties in the U.S. and abroad. These numerous and sometimes conflicting laws and regulations include the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Many foreign countries have enacted similar laws addressing fraud and abuse in the healthcare sector. The shifting commercial compliance environment and the need to build and maintain robust and expandable systems to comply with different compliance requirements in multiple jurisdictions increases the possibility that a healthcare company may run afoul of one or more of the requirements.

Violations of any fraud and abuse may result in significant fines, imprisonment and exclusion from the Medicare, Medicaid and other federal or state healthcare programs which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. If our operations are found to be in violation of any of these laws or any other governmental regulations that may apply to us, we may be subject to significant civil, criminal and administrative penalties, damages, fines, exclusion from federal healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, and the curtailment or restructuring of our operations. Dealing with investigations can be time and resource consuming and can divert management’s attention from the business. In addition, settlements with law enforcement agencies have forced healthcare providers to agree to additional onerous compliance and reporting requirements as part of a consent decree or corporate integrity agreement. Any violations of these laws, or any action against us for violation of these laws, even if we successfully defend against it, could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business and financial condition. See “Item 4. Information on the Company - B. Business Overview - Health Care Laws and Regulations - Fraud and Abuse Laws”.

The new disclosure rules regarding the use of conflict minerals may affect our relationships with suppliers and customers.

The Securities and Exchange Commission adopted disclosure rules in August 2012 for companies that use conflict minerals in their products, with substantial supply chain verification requirements in the event that the materials come from, or could have come from, the Democratic Republic of the Congo or adjoining countries. These new rules and verification requirements may impose additional costs on us and on our suppliers, and limit the sources or increase the prices of materials used in our products. Among other things, this new rule could affect sourcing at competitive prices and availability in sufficient quantities of certain minerals used in the manufacture of components that are incorporated into our products. In addition, the number of suppliers who provide conflict-free minerals may be limited, and there may be material costs associated with complying with the disclosure requirements, such as costs related to the process of determining the source of certain minerals used in our products, as well as costs of possible changes to products, processes, or sources of supply as a consequence of such verification activities. We may not be able to sufficiently verify the origins of the relevant minerals used in components manufactured by third parties through the procedures that we implement, and we may encounter challenges to satisfy those customers who require that all of the components of our products be certified as conflict-free, which could place us at a competitive disadvantage if we are unable to do so. If we are unable to certify that our products are conflict free, we may face challenges with our customers, which could place us at a competitive disadvantage, and our reputation may be harmed.

17

Risks Related to Ourour Operations in Israel

Our headquarters, manufacturing facilities, and most of our administrative offices are located in Israel and, therefore, our results may be adversely affected by military instability in Israel.

 

Our offices are located in Israel. In addition, the majority of our officers and directors are residents of Israel. Accordingly, geopolitical or military conditions in Israel and its region may directly or indirectly affect our business. Since the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948, a number of armed conflicts have taken place between Israel and its neighboring countries. Any hostilities involving Israel or the interruption or curtailment of trade between Israel and its trading partners could adversely affect our operations and results of operations. During July and August 2014, Hamas and Israel were engaged in a military conflict that caused damage and disrupted economic activities in Israel. During November 2012, Hamas and Israel were engaged in an armed conflict and during the summer of 2006, Israel was engaged in an armed conflict with Hezbollah, a Lebanese Islamist Shiite militia group and political party. These conflicts involved missile strikes against civilian targets in various parts of Israel, including areas in which our employees and consultants are located, and negatively affected business conditions in Israel. Any armed conflicts, terrorist activities or political instability in the region could adversely affect business conditions and could harm our results of operations and could make it more difficult for us to raise capital. The conflict situation in Israel could cause situations where medical product certifying or auditing bodies could not be able to visit our manufacturing facilities in order to review our certifications or clearances, thus possibly leading to temporary suspensions or even cancellations of our clearances or manufacturing certifications. The conflict situation in Israel could also result in parties with whom we have agreements involving performance in Israel claiming that they are not obligated to perform their commitments under those agreements pursuant to force majeure provisions in such agreements. Furthermore, several countries, principally in the Middle East, restrict doing business with Israel and Israeli companies, and additional countries may impose restrictions on doing business with Israel and Israeli companies if hostilities in the region continue or intensify. Such restrictions may seriously limit our ability to sell our products to customers in those countries.

 

Although the Israeli government is currently committed to covering the reinstatement value of direct damages that are caused by terrorist attacks or acts of war, we cannot assure that this government coverage will be maintained, or if maintained, will be sufficient to compensate us fully for damages incurred. Any losses or damages incurred by us could have a material adverse effect on our business. Any armed conflicts would likely negatively affect business conditions generally and could harm our results of operations.

 

Our operations may be disrupted as a resultThe legislative power of the obligationState resides in the Knesset, a unicameral parliament that consists of management or key personnel120 members elected by nationwide voting under a system of proportional representation. Israel’s most recent general elections were held on April 9, 2019 and September 17, 2019. Following the elections, the President selected Benjamin Netanyahu of the Likud party to perform military service.

Manyform a coalition government. The Likud party was unable to form a coalition in the newly selected Knesset by the stated deadline. Subsequently, the Knesset passed a dissolution bill declaring that the next general elections will be held in March 2020. The elections we’re held on March 2, 2020, following which the President selected Benny Gantz of our male employeesthe Blue and White Party, to attempt to form a collation. Following the failure of Benny Gantz to form a coalition, on April 16, 2020 the President commenced a twenty one (21) day period during which any member of Knesset may attempt to form a coalition, however a coalition has not yet been formed. The uncertainty surrounding the Knesset’s ability to form a coalition and government in Israel are obligated to perform one month,and may continue and the political situation in Israel may further deteriorate. Actual or perceived political instability in Israel or any negative changes in the political environment, may individually or in the aggregate adversely affect the Israeli economy and, in some cases more, of annual military reserve duty until they reachturn, the age of 40 (or older, for officers or reservists with certain occupations) and, in the event of a military conflict, may be called to active duty. In response to increases in terrorist activity, there have been periods of significant call-ups of military reservists, and recently some of our employees have been called up in connection with armed conflicts. It is possible that there will be military reserve duty call-ups in the future. Our operations could be disrupted by the absence of a significant number of our employees or of one or more of our key employees. Such disruption could materially adversely affect ourGroup’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.operations and prospects.

15

 

Exchange rate fluctuations between foreign currencies and the U.S. Dollar may negatively affect our earnings.

 

Our reporting and functional currency is the U.S. dollar. Our and ScoutCam Ltd. revenues are currently primarily payable in U.S. dollars and Euros and we expect our future revenues to be denominated primarily in U.S. dollars and Euros.dollars. However, certain amount of our expenses are in NIS and as a result, we are exposed to the currency fluctuation risks relating to the recording of our expenses in U.S. dollars. We may, in the future, decide to enter into currency hedging transactions. These measures, however, may not adequately protect us from material adverse effects.

18

 

The government tax benefits that we currently are entitled to receive require us to meet several conditions and may be terminated or reduced in the future.

 

Some of our operations in Israel may entitle us to certain tax benefits under the Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments, 5719-1959, or the Investments Law, once we begin to produce revenues.taxable income. From time to time, the government of Israel has considered reducing or eliminating the tax benefits available to Benefitted Enterprise programs such as ours. If we do not meet the requirements for maintaining these benefits, they may be reduced or cancelled and the relevant operations would be subject to Israeli corporate tax at the standard rate, which was set at 24% for 2017(to be reduced to 23% in 2018and thereafter).thereafter. In addition to being subject to the standard corporate tax rate, we could be required to refund any tax benefits that we have already received, plus interest and penalties thereon. Even if we continue to meet the relevant requirements, the tax benefits that our current “Benefitted Enterprise” is entitled to may not be continued in the future at their current levels, or at all. If these tax benefits were reduced or eliminated, the amount of taxes that we would have to pay if we produce revenues would likely increase, as all of our operations would consequently be subject to corporate tax at the standard rate, which could adversely affect our results of operations. Additionally, if we increase our activities outside of Israel, for example, by way of acquisitions, our increased activities may not be eligible for inclusion in Israeli tax benefits programs. See “Item 10. Additional Information - E. Taxation.” 

 

In the past, we received Israeli government grants for certain of our research and development activities. The terms of those grants may require us, in addition to payment of royalties, to satisfy specified conditions in order to manufacture products and transfer technologies outside of Israel,, including increase of the amount of our liabilities in connection with such grants.grants. If we fail to comply with the requirements of the Innovation Law (as defined below), we may be required to pay penalties in addition to repayment of the grants, and may impair our ability to sell our technology outside of Israel.

 

Some of our research and development efforts were financed in part through royalty-bearing grants, in an amount of $0.2 million that we received from the Israeli Innovation Authority of the Israeli Ministry of Economy and Industry, or IIA. When know-how is developed using IIA grants, the Encouragement of Research, Development and Technological Innovation in the Industry Law 5744-1984 (formerly known as the Law for the Encouragement of Research and Development in Industry 5744-1984), or the Innovation Law and the regulations thereunder, restricts our ability to manufacture products and transfer technology and know-how, developed as a result of IIA funding, outside of Israel.

 

Under the Innovation Law and the regulations thereunder, a recipient of IIA grants is required to return the grants by the payment of royalties of 3% to 6% on the revenues generated from the sale of products (and related services) developed (in whole or in part) under IIA program up to the total amount of the grants received from IIA, linked to the U.S. dollar and bearing interest at an annual rate of LIBOR applicable to U.S. dollar deposits, as published on the first business day of each calendar year.


The United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority, which regulates the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), announced in July 2017 that it will no longer persuade or require banks to submit rates for LIBOR after 2021. The grants received from the IIA bear an annual interest rate based on the 12-month LIBOR. Accordingly, there is considerable uncertainty regarding the publication of LIBOR beyond 2021. While it is not currently possible to determine precisely whether, or to what extent, the withdrawal and replacement of LIBOR would affect us, the implementation of alternative benchmark rates to LIBOR may increase our financial liabilities to the IIA. To date, IIA has not published a decision regarding an alternative benchmark to be used in the LIBOR’s stead.

 

Transfer of IIA funded know-how and related intellectual property rights outside of Israel, including by way of license for research and development purpose requires pre-approval by IIA and imposes certain conditions, including, requirement of payment of a redemption fee calculated according to the formula provided in the Innovation Law which takes into account, among others, the consideration for such know-how paid to us in the transaction in which the technology is transferred, research and development expenses, the amount of IIA support, the time of completion of IIA supported research project and other factors, while the redemption fee will not exceed 600% of the grants amount plus interest. No assurance can be given that approval to any such transfer, if requested, will be granted and what will be the amount of the redemption fee payable.

 

Transfer of IIA funded know-how and related intellectual property rights to an Israeli company requires a pre-approval by IIA and may be granted if the recipient undertakes to fulfil all the liabilities to IIA and undertakes to abide by the provisions of Innovation Law, including the restrictions on the transfer of know-how and the manufacturing rights outside of Israel and the obligation to pay royalties (note that there will be an obligation to pay royalties to IIA from the income received by us in connection with such transfer transaction as part of the royalty payment obligation). No assurance can be given that approval to any such transfer, if requested, will be granted.

19

 

In addition, the products may be manufactured outside Israel by us or by another entity only if prior approval is received from IIA (such approval is not required for the transfer outside of Israel of less than 10% of the manufacturing capacity in the aggregate, and in such event only a notice to IIA is required). As a condition for obtaining approval to manufacture outside Israel, we would be required to pay increased royalties, which usually amount to 1% in addition to the standard royalties rate, and also the total amount of our liability to IIA will be increased to between 120% and 300% of the grants we received from IIA, depending on the manufacturing volume that is performed outside Israel (less royalties already paid to IIA). This restriction may impair our ability to outsource manufacturing rights abroad, however, does not restrict export of our products that incorporate IIA funded know-how. 

 

A company also has the option of declaring in its IIA grant application its intention to exercise a portion of the manufacturing capacity abroad, thus avoiding the need to obtain additional approval. Such declaration may affect the increased royalties cap.

 

The restrictions under the Innovation Law (such as with respect to transfer of manufacturing rights abroad or the transfer of IIA funded know-how and related intellectual property rights abroad) will continue to apply even our liabilities to IIA in full and will cease to exist only upon payment of the redemption fee described above.

 

Furthermore, in the event that we undertake a transaction involving the transfer to a non-Israeli entity of technology developed with IIA funding pursuant to a merger or similar transaction, the consideration available to our shareholders may be reduced by the amounts we are required to pay to IIA. Any approval, if given, will generally be subject to additional financial obligations. Failure to comply with the requirements under the Innovation Law may subject us to mandatory repayment of grants received by us (together with interest and penalties), as well as expose us to criminal proceedings.

 

In May 2017, IIA issued new rules for licensing know how developed with IIA funding outside of Israel, or the Licensing Rules, allowing us to enter into licensing arrangements or grant other rights in know-how developed under IIA programs outside of Israel, subject to the prior consent of IIA and payment of license fees to IIA, calculated in accordance with the Licensing Rules. The payment of the license fees will not discharge us from the obligations to pay royalties or other payments to IIA.


We were members of an IIA-related consortium, in which certain of our technologies were developed. We are required to provide licenses to the other members of the consortium to use such technologies for no consideration, which could reduce our profitability.

 

Certain of our miniaturized imaging equipment may be based on technological models developed as part of the Bio Medical Photonic Consortium in the framework of Magnet program of the IIA. We received $2.3 million from IIA in the framework of the Consortium. The property rights in and to “new information” (as such term is defined therein) which has been developed by a member of the Consortium, in the framework of a research and development program conducted as part of the Consortium, belongs solely to the Consortium member that developed it. The developing member is obligated to provide the other members in the Consortium a non-sublicensable license to use of the “new information” developed by such member, without consideration, provided that the other members do not transfer such “new information” to any entity which is not a member of the Consortium, without the consent of such member. No royalties from this funding are payable to the Israeli government, however, the provisions of the Innovation Law and related regulations regarding, inter alia, the restrictions on the transfer of know-how outside of Israel do apply, mutatis mutandis.

 

Provisions of Israeli law and our articles of association may delay, prevent or otherwise impede a merger with, or an acquisition of, our company, which could prevent a change of control, even when the terms of such a transaction are favorable to us and our shareholders.

 

Israeli corporate law regulates mergers, requires tender offers for acquisitions of shares above specified thresholds, requires special approvals for transactions involving directors, officers or significant shareholders and regulates other matters that may be relevant to such types of transactions. For example, a merger may not be consummated unless at least 50 days have passed from the date on which a merger proposal is filed by each merging company with the Israel Registrar of Companies and at least 30 days have passed from the date on which the shareholders of both merging companies have approved the merger. In addition, a majority of each class of securities of the target company must approve a merger. Moreover, a tender offer for all of a company’s issued and outstanding shares can only be completed if the acquirer receives positive responses from the holders of at least 95% of the issued share capital. Completion of the tender offer also requires approval of a majority of the offerees that do not have a personal interest in the tender offer, unless, following consummation of the tender offer, the acquirer would hold at least 98% of the Company’s outstanding shares. Furthermore, the shareholders, including those who indicated their acceptance of the tender offer, may, at any time within six months following the completion of the tender offer, claim that the consideration for the acquisition of the shares does not reflect their fair market value, and petition an Israeli court to alter the consideration for the acquisition accordingly, unless the acquirer stipulated in its tender offer that a shareholder that accepts the offer may not seek such appraisal rights, and the acquirer or the company published all required information with respect to the tender offer prior to the tender offer’s response date.

 

20

Furthermore, Israeli tax considerations may make potential transactions unappealing to us or to our shareholders whose country of residence does not have a tax treaty with Israel exempting such shareholders from Israeli tax.  

 

These and other similar provisions could delay, prevent or impede an acquisition of us or our merger with another company, even if such an acquisition or merger would be beneficial to us or to our shareholders.

 

It may be difficult to enforce a judgment of a U.S. court against us and our officers and directors and the Israeli experts named in this annual report on Form 20-F in Israel or the U.S., to assert United States securities laws claims in Israel or to serve process on our officers and directors and these experts.

 

We are incorporated in Israel. Certain of our executive officers and directors reside in Israel and most of our assets and most of the assets of these persons are located outside of the United States. Therefore, a judgment obtained against us, or any of these persons in the United States, including one based on the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws, may not be collectible in the United States and may not necessarily be enforced by an Israeli court. It may also be difficult to affect service of process on these persons in the United States or to assert United States securities law claims in original actions instituted in Israel.


Even if an Israeli court agrees to hear such claim, it may determine that Israeli law, and not U.S. law is applicable to the claim. Under Israeli law, if U.S. law is found to be applicable to such claim, the content of applicable U.S. law must be proven as a fact by expert witnesses, which can be a time consuming and costly process, and certain matters of procedure would also be governed by Israeli law. There is little binding case law in Israel that addresses the matters.

 

The rights and responsibilities of a shareholder will be governed by Israeli law which differs in some material respects from the rights and responsibilities of shareholders of U.S. companies.

 

The rights and responsibilities of the holders of our ordinary shares are governed by our articles of association and by Israeli law. These rights and responsibilities differ in some material respects from the rights and responsibilities of shareholders in typical U.S.-registered corporations. In particular, a shareholder of an Israeli company has certain duties to act in good faith and fairness towards the company and other shareholders, and to refrain from abusing its power in the company. There is limited case law available to assist us in understanding the nature of this duty or the implications of these provisions. These provisions may be interpreted to impose additional obligations and liabilities on holders of our ordinary shares that are not typically imposed on shareholders of U.S. corporations.

 

The ability of any Israeli company to pay dividends is subject to Israeli law and the amount of cash dividends payable may be subject to devaluation in the Israeli currency.

 

The ability of an Israeli company to pay dividends is governed by Israeli law, which provides that cash dividends may be paid only out of retained earnings or earnings derived over the two most recent fiscal years, whichever is higher, as determined for statutory purposes in Israeli currency, provided that there is no reasonable concern that payment of a dividend will prevent a company from satisfying its existing and foreseeable obligations as they become due. In the event of a devaluation of the Israeli currency against the U.S. dollar, the amount in U.S. dollars available for payment of cash dividends out of prior years’ earnings will decrease.

 

21

The termination or reduction of tax and other incentives that the Israeli Government provides to domestic companies may increase the costs involved in operating a company in Israel.

 

The Israeli government currently provides major tax and capital investment incentives to domestic companies, as well as grant and loan programs relating to research and development and marketing and export activities. In recent years, the Israeli Government has reduced the benefits available under these programs and the Israeli Governmental authorities have indicated that the government may in the future further reduce or eliminate the benefits of those programs. We currently take advantage of these programs. There is no assurance that such benefits and programs would continue to be available in the future to us. If such benefits and programs were terminated or further reduced, it could have an adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

 

We may become subject to claims for remuneration or royalties for assigned service invention rights by our employees, which could result in litigation and adversely affect our business.

 

A significant portion of our intellectual property has been developed by our employees in the course of their employment for us. Under the Israeli Patent Law, 5727-1967, or the Patent Law, inventions conceived by an employee in the course and as a result of or arising from his or her employment with a company are regarded as “service inventions,” which belong to the employer, absent a specific agreement between the employee and employer giving the employee service invention rights. The Patent Law also provides that if there is no such agreement between an employer and an employee, the Israeli Compensation and Royalties Committee, or the Committee, a body constituted under the Patent Law, shallwill determine whether the employee is entitled to remuneration for his inventions. Recent case law clarifies that the right to receive consideration for “service inventions” can be waived by the employee and that in certain circumstances, such waiver does not necessarily have to be explicit. The Committee will examine, on a case-by-case basis, the general contractual framework between the parties, using interpretation rules of the general Israeli contract laws. Further, the Committee has not yet determined one specific formula for calculating this remuneration (but rather uses the criteria specified in the Patent Law). Although we generally enter into assignment-of-invention agreements with our employees pursuant to which such individuals assign to us all rights to any inventions created in the scope of their employment or engagement with us, we may face claims demanding remuneration in consideration for assigned inventions. As a consequence of such claims, we could be required to pay additional remuneration or royalties to our current and/or former employees, or be forced to litigate such claims, which could negatively affect our business.


Risks Related to an Investment in the Securities

 

We may be a passive foreign investment company, or PFIC, for U.S. federal income tax purposes in 20172019 or in any subsequent year. This may result in adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences for U.S. taxpayers that are holders of our securities.

 

We will be treated as a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes in any taxable year in which either (1) at least 75% of our gross income is “passive income” or (2) on average at least 50% of our assets by value produce passive income or are held for the production of passive income. Passive income for this purpose generally includes, among other things, certain dividends, interest, royalties, rents and gains from commodities and securities transactions and from the sale or exchange of property that gives rise to passive income. Passive income also includes amounts derived by reason of the temporary investment of funds, including those raised in a public offering. In determining whether a non-U.S. corporation is a PFIC, a proportionate share of the income and assets of each corporation in which it owns, directly or indirectly, at least a 25% interest (by value) is taken into account. We do not believe we were a PFIC for 2017 or 2016 but thereThere can be no assurance that we wereare not a PFIC in those years2019 and will not be a PFIC in subsequent years, as our operating results for any such years may cause us to be a PFIC. If we are a PFIC in 2017,2019, or any subsequent year, and a U.S. shareholder does not make an election to treat us as a “qualified electing fund,” or QEF, or make a “mark-to-market” election, then “excess distributions” to a U.S. shareholder, and any gain realized on the sale or other disposition of our securities will be subject to special rules. Under these rules: (1) the excess distribution or gain would be allocated ratably over the U.S. shareholder’s holding period for the securities; (2) the amount allocated to the current taxable year and any period prior to the first day of the first taxable year in which we were a PFIC would be taxed as ordinary income; and (3) the amount allocated to each of the other taxable years would be subject to tax at the highest rate of tax in effect for the applicable class of taxpayer for that year, and an interest charge for the deemed deferral benefit would be imposed with respect to the resulting tax attributable to each such other taxable year. In addition, if the U.S. Internal Revenue Service, or theIRS, determines that we are a PFIC for a year with respect to which we have determined that we were not a PFIC, it may be too late for a U.S. shareholder to make a timely QEF or mark-to-market election. U.S. shareholders who hold or have held our securities during a period when we were or are a PFIC will be subject to the foregoing rules, even if we cease to be a PFIC in subsequent years, subject to exceptions for U.S. shareholders who made a timely QEF or mark-to-market election. A U.S. shareholder can make a QEF election by completing the relevant portions of and filing IRS Form 8621 in accordance with the instructions thereto. If applicable, upon request, we will annually furnish U.S. shareholders with information needed in order to complete IRS Form 8621 (which form would be required to be filed with the IRS on an annual basis by the U.S. shareholder) and to make and maintain a valid QEF election for any year in which we or any of our subsidiaries are a PFIC.

22

 

The market prices of our securities are subject to fluctuation, which could result in substantial losses by our investors.

 

The stock market in general and the market prices of our ordinary shares on Tel Aviv Stock Exchange Ltd., or the TASE, and the ADSs on the NASDAQ,Nasdaq, in particular, are or will be subject to fluctuation, and changes in these prices may be unrelated to our operating performance. We anticipate that the market prices of our securities will continue to be subject to wide fluctuations. The market price of our securities are,is, and will be, subject to a number of factors, including:

 

announcements of technological innovations or new products by us or others;

 

announcements by us of significant acquisitions, strategic partnerships, in-licensing, out-licensing, joint ventures or capital commitments;

  

expiration or terminations of licenses, research contracts or other collaboration agreements;

   

public concern as to the safety of ourthe equipment we sell;

  

general market conditions;

the volatility of market prices for shares of medical devices companies generally;

  

developments concerning intellectual property rights or regulatory approvals;

 

developments concerning standard-of-care in endoscopic procedures;

variations in our and our competitors’ results of operations;


changes in revenues, gross profits and earnings announced by the company;

 

changes in estimates or recommendations by securities analysts, if our ordinary shares or the ADSs are covered by analysts;
fluctuations in the stock price of our publicly traded subsidiaries;

 

changes in government regulations or patent decisions; and

  

general market conditions and other factors, including factors unrelated to our operating performance.

 

These factors may materially and adversely affect the market price of our securities s and result in substantial losses by our investors.

 

23

Raising additional capital by issuing securities may cause dilution to existing shareholders.

 

We may seek additional capitalthrough a combination of private and public equity offerings, debt financings and collaborations and strategic and licensing arrangements. To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, the ownership interest will be diluted, and the terms of any such offerings may include liquidation or other preferences that may adversely affect the then existing shareholders rights. Debt financing, if available, would result in increased fixed payment obligations and may involve agreements that include covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific actions such as incurring debt or making capital expenditures. If we raise additional funds through collaboration, strategic alliance or licensing arrangements with third parties, we may have to relinquish valuable rights to our technologies, future revenue streams or product candidates, or grant licenses on terms that are not favorable to us.

 

We do not know whether a market for the ADSs and ordinary shares will be sustained or what the trading price of the ADSs and ordinary shares will be and as a result it may be difficult for you to sell your ADSs or ordinary shares.

 

Although our ADSs trade on NASDAQNasdaq and our ordinary shares trade on TASE, an active trading market for the ADSs or ordinary shares may not be sustained. It may be difficult for you to sell your ADSs or ordinary shares without depressing the market price for the ADSs or ordinary shares. As a result of these and other factors, you may not be able to sell your ADSs or ordinary shares. Further, an inactive market may also impair our ability to raise capital by selling ADSs and ordinary Shares and may impair our ability to enter into strategic partnerships or acquire companies or products by using our ordinary shares as consideration.

We do not know whether a market for our Series C Warrants will be sustained or what the trading price of the Series C Warrants will be and as a result it may be difficult for you to sell your Series C Warrants.

Even though our Series C Warrant are listed on Nasdaq, there is no assurance that a market will be sustained or maintain a high enough per warrant trading price to maintain the national exchange listing requirements in the future. Without an active market, the liquidity of the Series C Warrants will be limited.

 

Our Series C Warrants are speculative in nature.

The Series C Warrants do not confer any rights of ownership of ordinary shares or ADSs on their holders, such as voting rights or the right to receive dividends, but only represent the right to acquire ADSs at a fixed price for a limited period of time. Holders of the Series C Warrants may exercise their right to acquire ADSs and pay the exercise price per ADS of $3.50, subject to adjustment upon certain events, prior to five years from the date of issuance, after which date any unexercised warrants will expire and have no further value.

Future sales of our securities could reduce their market price.

 

Substantial sales of our securities, either on the TASE or on NASDAQ,Nasdaq, may cause the market price of our securities to decline. All of our outstanding ordinary shares are registered and available for sale in Israel. Sales by us or our security holders of substantial amounts of our securities, or the perception that these sales may occur in the future, could cause a reduction in the market price of our securities. 

21

 

The issuance of any additional ordinary shares, ADSs, warrants or any securities that are exercisable for or convertible into our ordinary shares or ADSs, may have an adverse effect on the market price of our securities and will have a dilutive effect on our existing shareholders and holders of ADSs.

 

Holders of ADSs may not receive the same distributions or dividends as those we make to the holders of our ordinary shares, and, in some limited circumstances, you may not receive dividends or other distributions on our ordinary shares and you may not receive any value for them, if it is illegal or impractical to make them available to you.

 

The depositary for the ADSs has agreed to pay to you the cash dividends or other distributions it or the custodian receives on ordinary shares or other deposited securities underlying the ADSs, after deducting its fees and expenses. You will receive these distributions in proportion to the number of ordinary shares your ADSs represent. However, the depositary is not responsible if it decides that it is unlawful or impractical to make a distribution available to any holders of ADSs. For example, it would be unlawful to make a distribution to a holder of ADSs if it consists of securities that require registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, but that are not properly registered or distributed under an applicable exemption from registration. In addition, conversion into U.S. dollars from foreign currency that was part of a dividend made in respect of deposited ordinary shares may require the approval or license of, or a filing with, any government or agency thereof, which may be unobtainable. In these cases, the depositary may determine not to distribute such property and hold it as “deposited securities” or may seek to effect a substitute dividend or distribution, including net cash proceeds from the sale of the dividends that the depositary deems an equitable and practicable substitute. We have no obligation to register under U.S. securities laws any ADSs, ordinary shares, rights or other securities received through such distributions. We also have no obligation to take any other action to permit the distribution of ADSs, ordinary shares, rights or anything else to holders of ADSs. In addition, the depositary may withhold from such dividends or distributions its fees and an amount on account of taxes or other governmental charges to the extent the depositary believes it is required to make such withholding. This means that you may not receive the same distributions or dividends as those we make to the holders of our ordinary shares, and, in some limited circumstances, you may not receive any value for such distributions or dividends if it is illegal or impractical for us to make them available to you. These restrictions may cause a material decline in the value of the ADSs.

 

24

Holders of ADSs must act through the depositary to exercise their rights as shareholders of our company.

 

Holders of our ADSs do not have the same rights of our shareholders and may only exercise the voting rights with respect to the underlying ordinary shares in accordance with the provisions of the Deposit Agreement. Under Israeli law and our articles of association, the minimum notice period required to convene a shareholders meeting is no less than 21 or 35 calendar days, depending on the proposals on the agenda for the shareholders meeting. When a shareholder meeting is convened, holders of ADSs may not receive sufficient notice of a shareholders’ meeting to permit them to withdraw their ordinary shares to allow them to cast their vote with respect to any specific matter. In addition, the Depositary and its agents may not be able to send voting instructions to holders of ADSs or carry out their voting instructions in a timely manner. We will make all reasonable efforts to cause the Depositary to extend voting rights to holders of the ADSs in a timely manner, but we cannot assure holders that they will receive the voting materials in time to ensure that they can instruct the Depositary to vote their ordinary shares underlying the ADSs. Furthermore, the Depositary and its agents will not be responsible for any failure to carry out any instructions to vote, for the manner in which any vote is cast or for the effect of any such vote. As a result, holders of ADSs may not be able to exercise their right to vote and they may lack recourse if their ordinary shares underlying the ADSs are not voted as they requested. In addition, in the capacity as a holder of ADSs, they will not be able to call a shareholders’ meeting.

22

 

We do not intend to pay any cash dividends on our ordinary shares in the foreseeable future and, therefore, any return on your investment in our securities must come from increases in the value and trading price of our securities.

 

We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our securities and do not anticipate that we will pay any cash dividends on our securities in the foreseeable future, therefore, any return on your investment in our securities must come from increases in the value and trading price of our securities.

 

We intend to retain our earnings to finance the development and expenses of our business. Any future determination relating to our dividend policy will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on a number of factors, including future earnings, our financial condition, operating results, contractual restrictions, capital requirements, business prospects, applicable Israeli law and other factors our board of directors may deem relevant.

 

We are an “emerging growth company,” and the reduced disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies may make our securities less attractive to investors.

 

We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, or the JOBS Act, and may remain an emerging growth company for up to five years. For so long as we remain an emerging growth company, we are permitted and intend to rely on exemptions from certain disclosure requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies. These exemptions include not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and not being required to comply with any requirement that may be adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding mandatory audit firm rotation or a supplement to the auditor’s report providing additional information about the audit and the financial statements. We cannot predict whether investors will find our securities less attractive if we rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our securities less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our securities and the price of our securities may be more volatile. 

 

In addition, the JOBS Act provides that an emerging growth company can take advantage of an extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards. This allows an emerging growth company to delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We are choosing to “opt out” of this provision and, as a result, we will comply with new or revised accounting standards as required when they are adopted. This decision to opt out of the extended transition period is irrevocable.

 

25

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our share price and trading volume could decline.

 

The trading market for our securities will depend on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business. We do not have any control over these analysts. There can be no assurance that analysts will cover us, or provide favorable coverage. If one or more analysts downgrade our share or change their opinion of our securities, the price of our securities would likely decline. In addition, if one or more analysts cease coverage of our company or fail to regularly publish reports on us, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which could cause our share price or trading volume to decline.

 

Our securities are traded on different markets and this may result in price variations.

 

Our ordinary shares have been traded on the TASE since February 2006 and our ADSs have been traded on the NASDAQNasdaq since August 5, 2015. Trading in our securities on these markets takes place in different currencies (U.S. dollars on the NASDAQNasdaq and NIS on the TASE), and at different times (resulting from different time zones, different trading days and different public holidays in the United States and Israel). The trading prices of these securities on these two markets may differ due to these and other factors. Any decrease in the price of our securities on one of these markets could cause a decrease in the trading price of our securities on the other market.

23

 

We incur additional increased costs as a result of the listing of the ADSs for trading on the NASDAQ,Nasdaq, and our management is required to devote substantial time to new compliance initiatives and reporting requirements.

 

As a public company in the United States, we incur significant accounting, legal and other expenses as a result of the listing of the ADSs on the NASDAQ.Nasdaq. These include costs associated with corporate governance requirements of the Securities Exchange Commission, or the SEC, and the Marketplace Rules of the NASDAQ,Nasdaq, as well as requirements under Section 404 and other provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. These rules and regulations increase our legal and financial compliance costs, introduce costs such as investor relations, stock exchange listing fees and shareholder reporting, and make some activities more time consuming and costly. Any future changes in the laws and regulations affecting public companies in the United States and Israel, including Section 404 and other provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the rules and regulations adopted by the SEC and the rules of the NASDAQNasdaq Stock Market, as well as compliance with the applicable full Israeli reporting requirements which currently apply to us as a company listed on the TASE (for so long as they apply to us, pending shareholder approval by special majority of a change to our TASE reporting requirements to allow us to report to the TASE in the same manner in which we report to the SEC), may result in increased costs to us as we respond to such changes. These laws, rules and regulations could make it more difficult or more costly for us to obtain certain types of insurance, including director and officer liability insurance, and we may be forced to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage. The impact of these requirements could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our board of directors, our board committees or as executive officers.

As a foreign private issuer, we are permitted to follow certain home country corporate governance practices instead of applicable SEC and NASDAQNasdaq requirements, which may result in less protection than is accorded to investors under rules applicable to domestic issuers.

 

As a foreign private issuer, we are permitted to follow certain home country corporate governance practices instead of those otherwise required under the rules of the NASDAQNasdaq for domestic issuers. Following our home country governance practices as opposed to the requirements that would otherwise apply to a U.S. company listed on the NASDAQ,Nasdaq, may provide less protection than is accorded to investors under the rules of the NASDAQNasdaq applicable to domestic issuers. For more information, see “Item 16G. Corporate Governance - Nasdaq Stock Market Listing Rules and Home Country Practices.”

 

In addition, as a foreign private issuer, we are exempt from the rules and regulations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, related to the furnishing and content of proxy statements, and our officers, directors and principal shareholders are exempt from the reporting and short-swing profit recovery provisions contained in Section 16 of the Exchange Act. In addition, we are not required under the Exchange Act to file annual, quarterly and current reports and financial statements with the SEC as frequently or as promptly as domestic companies whose securities are registered under the Exchange Act.

 

26

We may lose our foreign private issuer status in the future, which could result in significant additional costs and expenses.

 

We are a foreign private issuer, as such term is defined in Rule 405 under the Securities Act, and therefore, we are not required to comply with all the periodic disclosure and current reporting requirements of the Exchange Act and related rules and regulations. Under Rule 405, the determination of foreign private issuer status is made annually on the last business day of an issuer’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter and, accordingly, the next determination will be made with respect to us on June 30, 2018.2020.

 

In the future, we would lose our foreign private issuer status if a majority of our shareholders, directors or management are U.S. citizens or residents and we fail to meet additional requirements necessary to avoid loss of foreign private issuer status. Although we have elected to comply with certain U.S. regulatory provisions, our loss of foreign private issuer status would make such provisions mandatory. The regulatory and compliance costs to us under U.S. securities laws as a U.S. domestic issuer may be significantly higher. If we are not a foreign private issuer, we will be required to file periodic reports and registration statements on U.S. domestic issuer forms with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, which are more detailed and extensive than the forms available to a foreign private issuer. For example, the annual report on Form 10-K requires domestic issuers to disclose executive compensation information on an individual basis with specific disclosure regarding the domestic compensation philosophy, objectives, annual total compensation (base salary, bonus, equity compensation) and potential payments in connection with change in control, retirement, death or disability, while the SEC forms applicable to foreign private issuers permit them to disclose compensation information on an aggregate basis if executive compensation disclosure on an individual basis is not required or otherwise has not been provided in the issuer’s home jurisdiction. We disclose individual compensation information, but this disclosure is not as comprehensive as that required of U.S. domestic issuers since we are not required to disclose more detailed information in Israel. We intend to continue this practice as long as it is permitted under the SEC’s rules and Israel’s rules do not require more detailed disclosure. We will also have to mandatorily comply with U.S. federal proxy requirements, and our officers, directors and principal shareholders will become subject to the short-swing profit disclosure and recovery provisions of Section 16 of the Exchange Act. We may also be required to modify certain of our policies to comply with good governance practices associated with U.S. domestic issuers. Such conversion and modifications will involve additional costs. In addition, we may lose our ability to rely upon exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements on U.S. stock exchanges that are available to foreign private issuers.


If we are unable to satisfy the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 as they apply toWe have identified a foreign private issuer that is listing on a U.S. exchange for the first time, ormaterial weakness in our internal control over financial reporting. If we fail to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting, is not effective,we may be unable to report our financial results accurately or meet our reporting obligations, the reliability of our financial statements may be questioned, and our securities price may suffer.

 

Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires a company subject to the reporting requirements of the U.S. securities laws to doperform a comprehensive evaluation of its and its subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting. As such, we are required to document and test our internal control procedures and our management is required to assess and issue a report concerning our internal control over financial reporting. In addition, when applicable to comply with this statute, our independent registered public accounting firm may be required to issue an opinion on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting at a later date.

In connection with the issuance of our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019, we identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019. A “material weakness” is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

We have initiated actions toward remediating this material weakness by identifying our staffing requirements and commencing the process of hiring additional personnel for our finance team with the appropriate level of training and expertise. However, the implementation of these initiatives may not fully address this or any other material weakness or other deficiencies that we may have in our internal control over financial reporting.

We will continue to assess our internal control environment and the potential remediation of this material weakness. If we are unable to certify that our internal control over financial reporting is effective pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we could lose investor confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, which could harm our business, the price of our ordinary shares and our ability to access the capital markets.

 

The continuous process of strengthening our internal controls and complying with Section 404 is complicated and time-consuming. Furthermore, as our business continues to grow both domestically and internationally, our internal controls will become more complex and will require significantly more resources and attention to ensure our internal controls remain effective overall. During the course of its testing, our management may identify weaknesses or deficiencies, which may not be remedied in a timely manner. If our management cannot favorably assess the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting, or if our independent registered public accounting firm identifies material weaknesses in our internal control, investor confidence in our financial results may weaken, and the market price of our securities may suffer.

 

27

The right of the investors of our December 2016 offering to participate in future financings of our securities could impair our ability to raise capital.

Pursuant to the terms of the securities purchase agreements relating to an offering of our ADSs and warrants which closed on December 6, 2016, we granted the purchasers in such offering an eighteen month contractual preemptive right to participate in future financings, subject to certain exceptions, in an amount equal to up to 50% of the amount raised in such future financings. The existence of such preemptive rights, or the exercise of such rights, may deter potential investors from providing us needed financing, or may deter investment banks from working with us. This may have a material adverse effect on our ability to finance our company which, in turn, could lead to our inability to continue our business.

We may not satisfy NASDAQ’sNasdaq’s requirements for continued listing. If we cannot satisfy these requirements, NASDAQNasdaq could delist our securities. 

 

Our ADSs are listed on the NASDAQNasdaq under the symbol “MDGS”. To continue to be listed on NASDAQ,Nasdaq, we are required to satisfy a number of conditions, including a minimum bid price of at least $1.00 per share,ADS, a market value of our publicly held shares of at least $1 million and shareholders’ equity of at least $2.5 million. 

 

If we are delisted from NASDAQ,Nasdaq, trading in our securities may be conducted, if available, on the OTC Markets or, if available, via another market. In the event of such delisting, our shareholders would likely find it significantly more difficult to dispose of, or to obtain accurate quotations as to the value of our securities, and our ability to raise future capital through the sale of our securities could be severely limited. In addition, if our securities were delisted from NASDAQ,Nasdaq, our ADSs could be considered a “penny stock” under the U.S. federal securities laws. Additional regulatory requirements apply to trading by broker-dealers of penny stocks that could result in the loss of an effective trading market for our securities. Moreover, if our securities were delisted from NASDAQ,Nasdaq, we will no longer be exempt from certain provision of the Israeli Securities Law, and therefore will have increased disclosure requirements. 


ITEM 4.INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY

 

A.History and Development of the CompanCompanyy

 

Our legal and commercial name is Medigus Ltd. We were incorporated in the State of Israel on December 9, 1999, as a private company pursuant to the Israeli Companies Ordinance (New Version), 1983. In February 2006, we completed our initial public offering in Israel, and our ordinary shares have since traded on the TASE, under the symbol “MDGS”. In May 2015, we listed the ADSs on NASDAQ,Nasdaq, and since August 2015 the ADSs have been traded on the NASDAQNasdaq under the symbol “MDGS”. Our Series C Warrants have been trading on Nasdaq under the symbol “MDGSW” since July 2018. Each Series C Warrant is exercisable into one ADS for an exercise price of $3.50 and will expire five years from the date of issuance. Each ADS represents 5020 ordinary shares.

 

We are a public limited liability company and operate under the provisions of the Companies Law. Our registered office and principal place of businessbusiness are located at Omer Industrial Park, No. 7A, P.O. Box 3030, Omer 8496500, Israel and our telephone number in Israel is + 972 (72) 260 2200.972-72-260-2200. Our website address is http://www.medigus.com.www.medigus.com. The information contained on our website or available through our website is not incorporated by reference into and should not be considered a part of this Annual Reportannual report on Form 20-F.

 

On July 22,24, 2007, we formed a wholly owned subsidiary in the State of Delaware under the name Medigus USA LLC, or the Medigus U.S. Subsidiary. Our U.S. Subsidiary currently employs only our Chief Executive Officer, and onOn October 1, 2013, a service agreement was executed between the Company and theMedigus U.S. Subsidiary whereby theMedigus U.S. Subsidiary would render services to the Company against reimbursement of its direct expenses as well as a premium at a reasonable rate. In February 2019, Medigus USA LLC ceased its operations due to the termination of Chris Rowland, the Company’s previous chief executive officer.

On January 3, 2019, we formed a wholly owned subsidiary in Israel under the name ScoutCam Ltd. ScoutCam Ltd. was incorporated as part of a reorganization of the Company intended to distinguish the Company’s miniaturized imaging business, or the micro ScoutCam portfolio, from the other operations of the Company and to enable the Company to form a separate business unit with dedicated resources focused on the promotion of such technology.

 

On November 6, 2015,March 4, 2019, we effectedentered into a 10:1 reversebinding memorandum of understanding with Linkury Ltd., pursuant to which we intended to establish a commercial technological platform for the manufacturing, marketing and distribution of cannabidiol (CBD) based products. Following a review of the transaction, we have decided to terminate it.

On June 3, 2019, we entered into a Licensing and Sale Agreement with Shanghai Golden Grand-Medical Instruments Ltd. (Golden Grand) for the know-how licensing and sale of good relating to the Medigus Ultrasonic Surgical Endostapler (MUSE) system in China, Hong Kong, Taiwan and Macao. Under the agreement, we committed to provide a license, training services and goods to Golden Grand in consideration for $3,000,000 to be paid to us in four milestone based installments. To date, some of these milestones have been achieved and the Company has received $1,800,000. The final milestone shall be completed and the final installment paid upon completion of a MUSE assembly line in China.

On September 3, 2019, we consummated an investment agreement in Algomizer Ltd., or Algomizer, and its wholly owned subsidiary Linkury Ltd., or Linkury, for an aggregate investment of $5,000,000. The investment agreement contains customary provisions and warranties, and provides for us to invest NIS 5.4 million directly in Algomizer, which engages in internet advertising and whose shares are traded on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange. The investment was made at a price per Algomizer share split such that every 10 ordinaryof NIS 4.15. We invested an additional NIS 9 million through a direct acquisition of the shares par valueof Linkury from Algomizer, at a company valuation of Linkury of approximately NIS 0.01 were converted into one ordinary96 million. In addition, we invested an additional $1 million in Algomizer through equity exchange by issuing Algomizer American Depositary Shares (ADRs) at a price of $3 per ADR in consideration for Algomizer shares based on a price per Algomizer share par valueof NIS 0.10, without changing the rights attached to each share.4.15. In connection with the reverse share split, our share option plans and outstanding options andaddition, We issued Algomizer warrants to purchase our ordinary shares were also adjustedADRs in an amount equal to reflect the reverse share splitADRs issued to Algomizer, at an exercise price of $4 per ADR.


On December 1, 2019, Medigus and ScoutCam Ltd. consummated a certain Amended and Restated Asset Transfer Agreement, effective March 1, 2019, which transferred and assigned certain assets and intellectual property rights related to its miniaturized imaging business (A&R Transfer Agreement), and a patent license. Under the ratioA&R Transfer Agreement, we transferred two patent families in exchange for a license in connection with the marketing and sale of the ADSsMedigus Ultrasonic Surgical Endostapler. In addition, we granted to ScoutCam Ltd. a license to access, use, improve, develop, market and sell licensed intellectual property, including the right to any future versions, enhancements, improvements and derivative works of such licensed intellectual property in connection with the development and commercialization of the ScoutCam miniature video technology.

On December 30, 2019, or the Closing, we consummated a securities exchange agreement with Intelllisense Solutions Inc., a Nevada corporation (Intellisense), and as a result we assigned, transferred and delivered 100% of our holdings in ScoutCam Ltd. to Intellisense, in exchange for (i) common stock representing 60% of Intellisense’s issued and outstanding share capital as of the Closing, and (ii) in the event ScoutCam Ltd. achieves $33,000,000 in aggregate sales within the first three (3) years immediately following the Closing, we will receive additional shares of Intellisense’s common stock representing 10% of its outstanding share capital as of the Closing. Simultaneous with the Closing, Intellisense consummated a financing transaction in the aggregate amount of $3.3 million (gross) based on a company post-money valuation of $13.3 million. Following the aforementioned transaction, Intellisense changed its name to ScoutCam Inc.

On January 13, 2020, together with our advisor Mr. Kfir Zilberman we formed a subsidiary in Delaware, in which we hold 90% of the stock capital, under the name GERD IP, Inc., or GERD IP. GERD IP was adjustedincorporated in accordance with our efforts to five ordinaryreorganize our assets and increase asset and organizational efficiencies. In connection thereto, the Company entered into a founders agreement as of January 12, 2020, with Kfir Zilberman. The founders agreement subjects the transfer of GERD IP membership interests held by Kfir Zilberman to a right of first offer, and provides that owners of 51% of GERD IP membership interest may enforce a sale of GERD IP on the minority membership interest. The Company is obligated under the founders agreement to indemnify Kfir Zilberman for litigations expenses imposed on him or incurred by him in connection with his capacity as owner of a membership interest in GERD IP.

On February 18, 2020, we purchased 2,284,865 shares per ADS.of Matomy, which represents 2.32% of its issued and outstanding share capital. On March 24, 2020 we completed an additional purchase of 22,326,246 shares of Matomy, raising our aggregate holdings in Matomy to 24.99% of Matomy’s issued and outstanding share capital.

On April 19, 2020, we entered an Asset Transfer Agreement, effective January 20, 2020 with our majority owned subsidiary GERD IP, Inc. Pursuant to the Asset Transfer Agreement, we transferred certain of our patents in consideration for seven (7) capital notes issued to us by GERD IP, Inc., of $2,000,000 each.

 

On March 15, 2017, we effected a change inFollowing theratio of ordinary shares per ADS from five ordinary shares per ADS to 50 ordinary shares per ADS. The change in technology transfer and the ordinary shares ratiosecurities exchange agreement, ScoutCam Inc. began examining additional applications for the ADSs had the same effect as a 1-for-10 reverse stock splitour micro ScoutCam portfolio outside of the ADSs.medical device industry, among others, the defense, aerospace, automotive, and industrial non-destructing-testing industries and is pursuing opportunities and collaborations in this field. ScoutCam Inc. plans to further expand the activity in these non-medical spaces.

 

28

Based on the projected cash flows, cash and cash equivalents and short-term deposit balances as of December 31, 2017, which totaled to USD 2.8 million and USD 3.5 million, respectively, our management is of the opinion that without further fund raising it will notIn addition, we have sufficient resources to enable it to continue its operating activities including the development, manufacturing and marketing of its products for a period of at least 12 months from the date of approval of the financial statements. As a result, there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. For more information see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects―Operating Capital and Capital Expenditure Requirements and Note 1b to our financial statements.

To date, substantially all of our revenues have derived from our miniaturized imaging equipment for use within the medical and industrial fields. However, we are currently focused on the marketing and continued development of our MUSE™ product as described below.

We engagepreviously engaged in the development, production and marketing of innovative medical devices, including flexible surgical staplers with direct vision systems for minimally invasive medical procedures. Our expertise is in the development, production and marketing of innovative endoscopic surgical devices for the treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, or GERD, a common ailment which is predominantly treated by medical therapy (e.g., proton pump inhibitorsor in more chronic cases, conventional open or laparoscopic surgery. Our FDA-cleared and CE-marked product, known as the MUSE™MUSE System, enables a trans-orifice procedure, or scar less procedure through a natural opening in the body, that requires no incision for the treatment of GERD by reconstruction of the esophageal valve where the stomach and the esophagus meet. We believethis procedure offersare no longer maintaining efforts to commercialize the MUSE System and rather are pursuing potential opportunities to sell or grant a safe, effective and economical alternative to the current surgical methods of GERD treatment. In addition, this trans-orifice approach has the ability to provide results which are equivalent to those of standard surgical procedures while reducing pain and trauma, minimizing hospital stays, and delivering economic value to hospitals and payors.

The key elements of the MUSE™ system include a single-use, flexible stapler (also called an Endostapler) containing several sophisticated innovative technologies such as a surgical stapler, miniature camera and ultrasound sensor, as well as a control console, offering a video image transmitted from the tip of the Endostapler.

In addition to the MUSE™ systemlicense for the treatmentuse of GERD, we are engaged in the development of other minimally invasive endosurgical tools, as well as miniaturized imaging equipment for use in medical procedures as well as various industrial applications.our MUSEtechnology.


Principal Capital Expenditures

 

We and ScoutCam Ltd. had capital expenditures of approximately $9,000, $38,000$62,000, and $96,000$11,000 and $9,000 in the yearyears ended on December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018, and 2015,2017, respectively. Our capital expenditures consisted mainly ofare primarily for network infrastructure, computer hardware, purchase of machinery equipment and computers.software and leasehold improvements of our facilities. We have financed our capital expenditures from our available cash and short-term investments.cash. We expect to maintain our capital expenditures in 20182020 with a consistent volume of products and to meet our pre-approved budget.volume.

 

There are no significant capital expenditures or divestitures currently in progress by the Company.

 

B.Business Overview

 

Overview

 

We are a medical device company dedicated topreviously engaged in the development, manufacturingproduction and marketing of surgical endostaplers and direct vision systemsinnovative miniaturized imaging equipment known as the micro ScoutCamportfolio for minimally invasiveuse in medical procedures oras well as various industrial applications, through our Israeli subsidiary, ScoutCam Ltd. ScoutCam Ltd. was incorporated as part of a reorganization of the Company intended to distinguish the Company’s micro ScoutCamportfolio from the other commercial use. Our expertiseoperations of the Company and to enable the Company to form a separate business unit with dedicated resources, focused on the promotion of our miniaturized imaging technology. After we completed the transfer of all of the Company’s assets and intellectual property related to the Company’s miniature video cameras business into ScoutCam Ltd., we consummated a securities exchange agreement with Intellisense Solutions Inc., under which we received 60% of the issued and outstanding stock of Intellisense Solutions Inc. in consideration for 100% of our holdings in ScoutCam Ltd. Following the aforementioned transactions, Intellisense Solutions Inc. changed its name to ScoutCam Inc. Since the securities exchange agreement, the commercialization efforts relating to the ScoutCamportfolio are carried out exclusively by ScoutCam Inc.

ScoutCam Inc. is examining and pursuing additional applications for the micro ScoutCam portfolio outside of the medical device industry, among others, the defense, aerospace, automotive, and industrial non-destructing-testing industries, and plans to further expand the activity in these non-medical spaces.

In addition, we have been engaged in the development, production and marketing of innovative surgical devices with direct visualization capabilities for the treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, or GERD, a common ailment, which is predominantly treated by medical therapy (e.g. proton pump inhibitors) or in chronic cases, conventional open or laparoscopic surgery. Our FDA-cleared and CE-marked endosurgical system, known as the Medigus Ultrasonic Surgical Endostapler, or MUSE™MUSE (Medigus Ultrasonic Surgical Endostapler) system, enables minimally-invasive and incisionless procedures for the treatment of GERD by reconstruction of the esophageal valve via the mouth and esophagus, eliminating the need for surgery in eligible patients. We believe that this procedure offers a safe, effective and economical alternative to the current modes of GERD treatment for certain GERD patients, and has the ability to provide results which are equivalent to those of standard surgical procedures while reducing pain and trauma, minimizing hospital stays, and delivering economic value to hospitals and payors.

29

payers. The key elements of the MUSE™MUSE system include a single-use endostapler containing several sophisticated innovative technologies such as flexible stapling technology, a miniature camera and ultrasound sensor, as well as a control console offering a video image transmitted from the tip of the endostapler. Our board of directors has determined to examine potential opportunities to sell or grant a license to our MUSE technology, or alternatively grant a license or licenses for the use of the MUSEtechnology.

 

ScoutCam Inc.’s Micro ScoutCam Portfolio

ScoutCam Inc. is engaged in the development, production and marketing of innovative miniaturized equipment known as its micro ScoutCam™ portfolio for use in medical procedures as well as various industrial applications. ScoutCam Inc. derives a substantial portion of its revenue from applications of its micro ScoutCam™ portfolio within the medical and industrial fields. ScoutCam Inc. has recently begun examining additional applications for the micro ScoutCam™ portfolio outside of the medical device industry, including in, among others, the defense, aerospace, automotive, and industrial non-destructing-testing industries. ScoutCam Inc. plans to further expand the activity in these non-medical spaces.


ScoutCam Inc.’s vision is to improve the performance of organizations by offering prestigious tools that enhance the visual technological capabilities of companies across a variety of industries. ScoutCam Inc.’s mission is to become a global leader providing innovative, custom-tailored visualization solutions to organizations across a variety of industries based on small and highly resistant cameras and supplementary technologies. Since ScoutCam Inc. is focused on custom-tailored solutions, it has a very limited offering of off-the-shelf products, which are used mainly as demonstrators for new prospects of our technology and capabilities, rather than as a major source of revenue. Moreover, as it focus only on the visualization apparatus and supporting components, including for example a small camera, illumination, cleaning method (e.g., irrigation), and/or a mechanical structure based on the customer’s needs, in most cases ScoutCam Inc.’s products are components of the customer’s end-user products rather than independent end-user products.

ScoutCam Inc.’s business model includes engaging customers seeking to add a video visualization to its existing or new product(s) in two phases. During the first phase, ScoutCam Inc. conduct the research and development that is required in order to specify, develop, and product the designated visualization apparatus, all for an agreed compensation (e.g., a non-recurrent engineering fee). During the second phase, ScoutCam Inc. manufactures the apparatus and sells it to the customer for an agreed transfer price. In some cases, upon a customer’s request, it offers complete ‘turn-key’ contracts, in which it is responsible for most or all product phases, from the specifications phase to the provision of components or products that are complete, packaged and ready for sale. In such cases, it may conduct the necessary regulatory tests and handle the required regulatory approvals. In addition, ScoutCam Inc. may also be responsible, as necessary, for, inter alia, packaging, sterilization, labeling and shipment.

ScoutCam Inc.’s customers are technology-based companies and organizations of all sizes, from early stage start-ups to large, well-established, international corporations. However, ScoutCam Inc. prefers engaging the latter business partnership as larger corporations provide financial stability, large quantities, recurring revenue, and valid forecasts for extended durations. In addition, it engages customers from various industries, such as biomedical, aerospace, certain sensitive or classified industries, security and defense, and research.

ScoutCam Inc. interacts with prospects globally in order to engage in new projects by various business development and marketing means. The core ScoutCam Inc. team that is responsible for these efforts includes a highly experienced VP Business Development. ScoutCam Inc. uses both active and passive marketing measures to gather interest from potential customers. These efforts may include the following:

engaging third party companies as territorial representatives in key markets;

initiating business engagements based on leads received through its website or via other methods or means;

conducting initial R&D together with such prospects in order to evaluate the feasibility of their contemplated projects;

maintaining an updated and detailed website presenting its core competency and proven track record;

promoting its website in different search engines and other digital forums through SEO campaigning as well as other proactive digital marketing measures;

employing certain social media platforms for campaigning and advertising;

reconnecting with its large database, which includes a multitude of past prospects;

developing and refining marketing communications materials, including digital and printed brochures; and

participating in major vision technology exhibitions such as AIA Vision Show (USA) and Vision Show (Germany).

ScoutCam Inc.’s Customers

Currently, ScoutCam Inc. has two major customers that generate most of its current and forecasted revenue in the near term. One of them is a large international bio-med company. ScoutCam Inc. develops a visualization component for this customer’s invasive surgical device. The other customer is a US based company that develops and markets minimally invasive, surgical devices for skeletal and soft-tissue procedures. The company specializes in orthopedic surgeries of the extremities.

In addition to these two material customers, ScoutCam Inc. is engaged in initial negotiations with multiple potential customers operating in a variety of sectors, including biomedical, aerospace, military and security, and others. ScoutCam Inc. is pursuing these potential engagements with the MUSE™ system forgoal of securing research and development contracts that may then materialize into multi-year production contracts.

Competition with ScoutCam Inc.’s ScoutCam portfolio

After years of being almost alone in the treatment of GERD, we have developed miniaturized videomarket, ScoutCam Inc. now competes with several companies which offer small cameras for use in various medical proceduressuch as wellOpcom, Fujikura-Picoramedic, Awaiba, Fisba, Misumi and Sanovas. In addition, IntraVu, Medit and SPI Engineering are companies which offer complete small diameter off-the shelf endoscopes/borescopes.

ScoutCam Inc., unlike the aforementioned competitors, offer customized solutions, which includes additional components as specialized industrial applications.needed. ScoutCam Inc. Focuses on customizing and integrating its solutions into a given customer’s device. Certain companies, such as Enable, Myriad Fiber Imaging Tech., Inc, and Precision Optics, act as direct competitors, since they offer similar services.

Our MUSE‎‎ System

 

Prevalence of GERD

 

GERD, is a worldwide disorder, with evidence suggesting an increase in GERD disease prevalence since 1995. The sample size weighted mean for the GERD population in the United States and Europe is 19.8% and 15.2% respectively. In the United States alone, over 49 million adults are affected by GERD, with over 29 million adults suffering daily from GERD symptoms. Proton pump inhibitors, or PPIs, are a class of effective and generally safe medication to treat GERD, but not everyone who experiences heartburn needs a PPI. Several PPIs have been widely advertised to consumers and heavily promoted by physicians. This has led to an overuse of the drug. PPIs are the third highest selling class of drugs in the U.S. and Nexium has the second highest retail sales among all drugs at $4.8 billion in 2008. This figure does not include sales of other brands of PPIs.

 

After being swallowed, food descends through the esophagus to the stomach, which contains acids and enzymes intended to digest and break down food. GERD is caused by the defective operation of the lower esophageal sphincter, or LES, a valve which controls the flow of ingested food from the esophagus into the stomach. While eating and between eating periods, a properly operating LES prevents stomach contents from entering the esophagus. Among GERD sufferers, the valve opens spontaneously or is unable to close properly. This results in acidic stomach contents rising into the esophagus, causing irritation, acid reflux and heartburn, as well as other potentially dangerous conditions.

Beyond painful symptoms, GERD may also increase sufferers’ susceptibility to cancer. Whereas the stomach is lined by the “gastric mucosal barrier” which allows acidic material to be contained harmlessly, the surface of the esophagus consists of flat, thin cells called squamous cells, which are not resistant to acid. Repeated episodes of acid reflux can cause inflammation of the esophagus, a condition called esophagitis. The flat cells lining the esophagus can also undergo genetic changes due to exposure to acid, causing these cells to resemble those found in the stomach lining, a condition known as Barrett’s Esophagus.

Barrett’s Esophagus is a complication of GERD and predisposes patients to esophageal adenocarcinoma, a tumor that has increased in incidence more than seven-fold over the past several decades. Studies have shown that people exhibiting Barrett’s Esophagus have a higher risk of developing cancer of the esophagus. Studies have also shown, that compared to patients not exhibiting GERD symptoms, patients exhibiting weekly symptoms of GERD have a five times higher probability for developing esophageal cancer while patients exhibiting daily symptoms of GERD have a seven times higher probability for developing esophageal cancer. The most common risk factors for cancer in Barrett’s Esophagus patients include chronic GERD, hiatal hernia, advanced age, male sex, white race, cigarette smoking and obesity.

Treatment of GERD

 

Treatment of GERD involves a stepwise approach. The goals are to control symptoms, to heal esophagitis and to prevent recurrent esophagitis. The treatment is based on lifestyle modification and control of gastric acid through medical treatment (antacids, PPI’s, H2 blockers or other reflux inhibitors) or antireflux surgery. Mild GERD may be defined as intermittent reflux symptoms that can be managed with lifestyle changes or over-the-counter medications. Moderate to severe GERD represents more chronic symptoms that may require stronger drugs, long term medication or surgical intervention. 

30

 

Drug Treatment - Proton pump inhibitors (PPI)

 

For moderate to severe GERD, physicians usually prescribe PPIs. This class of drugs reduces acid production by the stomach, and thereby relieves the patients of their symptoms. Drugs of this class are among the most commonly prescribed medications in the world. There are several brands on the market, best known are Prilosec (omeprazole), Prevacid (lansoprazole)(lansoprazole) and Nexium (esomeprazole)(esomeprazole). Certain PPI drugs are available over the counter in the United States and in other countries, but the over the counter dosage may be inadequate to control GERD symptoms, except in mild cases.

While PPI drugs effectively reduce the severity and frequency of GERD symptoms, they have a number of drawbacks:

a) In approximately 30% of patients, symptom control is incomplete;

b) The drugs do not treat the disease, they only control its manifestations and therefore they must be taken for life at a dosage which requires prescription. Accumulated costs may be substantial; and

c) Long term use is associated with a number of serious adverse effects. In particular, they increase the risk of osteoporosis and fractures of the hip, wrist and spine. The FDA has issued a warning on this effect as well as warnings against other untoward effects on absorption of other essential minerals, which may lead to chronic kidney disease, irregular heartbeat, diarrhea and increased flatulence.


Interventional treatmentTreatment

 

The most common operation for GERD is called a surgical fundoplication, a procedure that prevents reflux by wrapping or attaching the upper part of the stomach around the lower esophagus and securing it with sutures. Due to the presence of the wrap or attachment, increasing pressure in the stomach compresses the portion of the esophagus which is wrapped or attached by the stomach, and prevents acidic gastric content from flowing up into the esophagus. Today, the operation is usually performed laparoscopically: instead of a single large incision into the chest or abdomen, four or five smaller incisions are made in the abdomen, and the operator uses a number of specially designed tools to operate under video control.

 

The operation does not completely eliminate the use of PPIs, and up to approximately 60% of the patients who undergo this surgery still use some in long term follow up. Nevertheless, the dose is usually lower – in the over the counter range – and the response rate is excellent. Since the majority of patients referred to surgeons are incomplete responders, or require a high dose of PPI, the patients are generally satisfied with the operation, and the overall costs of treatment are lower in the long run.MUSESolution

 

In spite of clinical outcome of surgery, relatively few patients undergo surgery. We estimate that large numbers of patients who are candidates for operative treatment are either not referred by their treating physician or decline it. We believe that many patients decline to undergo operations to avoid even minute scars or violation of the abdominal cavity.

Given the current environment in which the vast majority of GERD sufferers in North America and Europe must choose between long-term pharmaceutical therapy and surgery, leading to what is known in our industry as the “treatment gap”, we believe there is a demand for a minimally-invasive, incision-less procedure which treats the root cause of the disease. We believe thatOur product, the MUSETM system is positioned to fill this need.

Our system achieves the general physiological result of surgical fundoplication, by inserting the MUSETM endostapler through the mouth and the esophagus, and stapling the top of the stomach to the side of the esophagus. The endostapler contains a video camera and stapling system. Staples have long been used in surgical procedures in place of sutures, and we believe that they are at least as reliable and potentially more durable. Our endostapler uses standard surgical staples.

First line therapy for GERD includes a combination of lifestyle modifications and medical therapy or PPIs. Unfortunately, 25% to 42% of patients with GERD do not respond to an initial 4-8-week treatment of PPI. In those who do respond to therapy, the effectiveness of PPI treatment decreases over time. Anti-reflux surgery controls acid reflux and treats an incompetent lower esophageal sphincter, while also improving patient quality of life in the long term. Thus, PPI therapy and lifestyle modifications are frequently eliminated.

31

Despite the effectiveness of surgery, it is invasive, requires hospitalization, and carries the risk of short and long-term complications, including dysphagia, diarrhea, and gas bloat syndrome. Thus, endoscopic therapies that mimic the mechanism through which surgery works and can reduce surgical morbidity have gained popularity for the treatment of GERD.

The market for medical devices, including the market for endoscopic therapies, is very broad, with an increasing demand for new less invasive alternatives to the existing surgical procedures for the treatment of various diseases. This increasing need for minimally-invasive and incision-less treatments, such as endoscopy-based procedures, are also augmented by the increase in the average age of global population. In 2000, the worldwide population of persons aged more than 65 years was an estimated 420 million. During 2000-2030, the worldwide population aged more than 65 years is projected to increase by approximately 550 million to 973 million. This increase in age will potentially lead to increased healthcare costs and may have dramatic consequences for public health and the healthcare financing and delivery systems.

Endoscopy is a minimally invasive method of performing investigative, diagnostic and therapeutic medical procedures, employing an endoscope, which allows real-time visual observation of the patient’s internal organs during the procedure. Endoscopic procedures are most commonly performed through natural orifices, including the mouth, to avoid incisions. Because of the accessibility of the digestive tract through the mouth, the endoscopy field is largely focused on disorders of the gastrointestinal tract such as disorders of the colon, esophagus, stomach and duodenum.

Endoscopes are commonly composed of a flexible tube with a camera installed at its tip. Endoscopes often include “working channels” through which catheters or other endoscopic tools or devices may be inserted directly into the patient’s digestive system. The primary advantage of endoscopy is the elimination of incisions to the patient’s body during a medical procedure. We believe that this is safer, prevents most post-operative pain and facilitates faster recuperation. Patient perception or preference is important as well. The perception of endoscopy procedures as being safer, and less painful than, corresponding surgical procedures may have the effect of minimizing patient fears.

Endoscopic procedures generally involve less recovery time and patient discomfort than conventional open or laparoscopic surgery. These procedures are also typically performed in the outpatient hospital setting as opposed to an inpatient setting. Typically, outpatient procedures cost the hospital or the insurer less money since there is no overnight stay in the hospital.

Our Solution

The MUSE‎™‎ system

Our primary product, the MUSE‎™‎ system for transoral fundoplication is a single use innovativeinnovate device for the incisionless treatment of GERD. The MUSETMtechnology is based on our proprietary platform technology, experience and know-how. While at present substantially all of our revenue is derived from the miniature video camera and related equipment, our strategy is focused on the development and promotion of the MUSETM system, which we therefore refer to as our ‘primary product’. 

Transoral means thethat procedure is performedperform through the mouth, rather than through incisions in the abdomen. The MUSE™ system for transoral fundoplication was previously known as the SRS™ Endoscopic Stapling System. We rebranded to the MUSETMsystem following the launch of the most recent generation product. The MUSETM system is used to perform a procedure as an alternative to a surgical fundoplication. The MUSETM system offers an endoscopic, incisionless alternative to surgery. A single surgeon or gastroenterologist can perform the MUSETM procedure in a transoral way, unlike in a laparoscopic fundoplication which requires incisions.

 

32

The MUSE system consists of the MUSE‎MUSE‎ console controller, the MUSETMendostapler and several accessories, including an overtube, irrigation bottle, tubing supplies and staple cartridges. The MUSETM endostapler incorporates a video camera, a flexible surgical stapler and an ultrasonic guidance system that is used to measure the distance between the anvil and the cartridge of the stapler, to ensure their proper alignment and tissue thickness. The device also contains an alignment pin, which is used for initial positioning of the anvil against the cartridge, two anvil screws, which are used to reduce the thickness of the tissue that needs to be stapled and to fix the position of the anvil and the MUSETM endostapler during stapling. The system allows the operator to staple the fundus of the stomach to the esophagus, in two or more locations, typically around the circumference, thereby creating a fundoplication, without any incisions.

Endoscopic procedures generally involve less recovery time and patient discomfort than conventional open or laparoscopic surgery. These procedures are also typically performed in the outpatient hospital setting as opposed to an inpatient setting. Typically, outpatient procedures cost the hospital or the insurer less money since there is no overnight stay in the hospital.

 

The clearance by the FDA, or ‘Indications for Use’, of the MUSETM system is “for endoscopic placement of surgical staples in the soft tissue of the esophagus and stomach in order to create anterior partial fundoplication for treatment of symptomatic chronic Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease in patients who require and respond to pharmacological therapy”. As such, the FDA clearance covers the use by an operator of the MUSE‎endostapler as described in the above paragraph. In addition, in the pivotal study that was presented to the FDA in order to gain clearance, only patients who were currently taking GERD medications (i.e. pharmacological therapy) were allowed in the study. In addition, all patients had to have a significant decrease in their symptoms when they were taking medication compared to when they were off the medication. As such, the FDA clearance included the indication that MUSETM system is intended for patients who require and respond to pharmacological therapy. The MUSETM system indication does not restrict its use with respect to GERD severity from a regulatory point of view. However, clinicians typically only consider interventional treatment options for moderate to severe GERD. Therefore, it is reasonable to expect the MUSETM Systemsystem would be primarily used to treat moderate and severe GERD in practice. The system has received 510(k) marketing clearance from the FDA in the United States, as well as a CE mark in Europe and a license from Health Canada. It is also cleared for use in Turkey and in Israel.

 

On June 3, 2019, we entered into a Licensing and Sale Agreement with Shanghai Golden Grand-Medical Instruments Ltd. (Golden Grand) for the know-how licensing and sale of good relating to the Medigus Ultrasonic Surgical Endostapler (MUSE) system in China, Hong Kong, Taiwan and Macao. Under the agreement, we committed to provide a license, training services and goods to Golden Grand in consideration for $3,000,000 to be paid to us in four milestone based installments. To date, some of these milestones have been achieved and the Company has received $1,800,000. The final milestone shall be completed and the final installment paid upon completion of a MUSE assembly line in China.

31

Clinical StudiesOther Activities

 

The original FDA submission for the MUSETM system included short term (six month) results from a multi-center clinical trial. The trial was conducted in support of the 510(k) marketing clearance submission for the system and pursuant to an FDA-issued Investigational Device Exemption (IDE).

Enrollment was completed in November 2010. A total of 72 patients were enrolled and 69 were treated with the MUSETM system during the study. A manuscript detailing the results of this study was published in Surgical Endoscopy and is currently available online. Publication in the hardcopy of the journal was in the January 2015 issue.

The primary objective of the study was to assess the safety and efficacy of the system in the treatment of subjects with GERD. The primary efficacy endpoint was at least a 50% improvement in the GERD Health Related Quality of Life, or HRQL, scores in 53% of the subjects. GERD-HRQL is the standard assessment of how an individual’s well-being may be affected over time by a disease. Secondary efficacy assessments included PPI intake, esophageal acid exposure during a 24-hour period and anatomical changes. The follow-up period was set at six months following each procedure.

The primary endpoint was met in that 73% of subjects exhibited at least a 50% reduction in GERD-HRQL at six months. In addition, 85% of subjects reduced their PPI intake by at least 50%, with 65% of subjects eliminating PPI use completely at six months.

FDA marketing clearance for our system was granted in May 2012 following the original FDA submission. Subsequent improvements to the system included improvements to the camera, illumination and alignment mechanisms, the addition of an electronic stapling motor, and condensing two control consoles into a single unit. FDA clearance for the modified system was obtained in June 2015. The modified system has also obtained a CE mark in Europe, a license from Health Canada and was approved in Turkey and Israel.

In May 2013, we received five years of follow-up results for a precursor IRB (Institutional Review Board) approved pilot study of the system conducted in 2007 at Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Center in the city of Pune, India. The results of this follow-up study were published in the peer review journal Surgical Endoscopy inMarch 2015. As noted in the journal article, the five-year results are similar to the results obtained from subjects who received-laparoscopic procedures for GERD in the same period. Each year, eleven of the thirteen patients were reached (although not always the same eleven). All thirteen patients had at least a four year follow-up. Throughout the follow up period, GERD-HRQL scores were normal in all but one patient. All patients indicated that they would agree to do the procedure again. Out of the initial thirteen patients, seven (54%) had eliminated their PPI intake and another three (23%) reduced PPI use by 50% or more. It should be emphasized that for this trial patients were selected with GERD severity at a higher than average level (moderate to severe), a fact which may indicate an even greater outcome of the effect of the system in an average GERD level patient population.

33

In November 2015, a follow-up study conducted in the United States looked at evaluating the long-term clinical outcome of 37 patients who received GERD treatment with the MUSETM system in the multi-center study mentioned above was concluded. Efficacy and safety data were analyzed up to four years post-procedure. No new complications have been reported in such long-term analysis. The proportions of patients who remained off daily PPI were 83.8% (31/37) at six months, and 69.4% (25/36) at 4 years post-procedure. GERD-HRQL scores off PPI were significantly decreased following six months and four years post-procedure. The authors concluded that the MUSETM system appeared to be safe and effective in improving symptom scores as well as reducing PPI use in patients with GERD. These results appeared to be equal to or better than those of the other devices for endoluminal GERD therapy.

In February 2017, we received an approval to start a multi-center MUSE™ system clinical study in China after the China Food and Drug Administration, or the CFDA, reviewed the complete submission package. In addition, each study location received approval from their ethics committees and agreements were put in place. Under Principal Investigator, Yunsheng Yang, Director of Gastroenterology Department Clinical center at 301 Hospital and Chairman of Chinese Society of Gastroenterology, The General Hospital of People’s Liberation Army in Beijing, the clinical study will include approximately 62 patients, will take place at 5 centers across China: The General Hospital of People’s Liberation Army, Renji Hospital of Shanghai, Shanghai General Hospital, Peking University Third Hospital and Navy General Hospital.

Procedures started in March 2017 and are expected to carry on through 2018. We expect the results to be reported back to the CFDA in 2019 as part of the final CFDA submission for clearance to sell the MUSE™ system in China.

Miniature Video Cameras

By definition all endoscopes must include vision apparatus to facilitate the operator’s view of the internal organs of the patient. In the past, fiber optics were utilized for this purpose, and have been gradually replaced with electronic video systems offering higher resolution and higher-quality images. We have developed several models of miniaturized digital video cameras and video processing equipment, for use in medical endoscopy products as well as industrial uses. Our cameras range between 3.45mm to 0.99 mm in diameter, and are based on single-use Complementary Metal Oxide Semiconductor, or CMOS, image sensors. In some cases, our cameras are relatively inexpensive, allowing them to be used in single-use devices.

Our miniature cameras are intended for use in medical applications in which it has not yet been feasible to use miniature video cameras, and may be integrated into devices developed by the company, or by third parties who source the camera from us. We expect that the growing demand for single-use medical devices will increase demand for the CMOS cameras in particular, in fields such as gastroenterology, orthopedics, gynecology, ears nose throat, urology, cardio-vascular, and other fields in which diagnostic and surgical procedures may be performed endoscopically. Small-diameter video cameras permit not only smaller camera-based endoscopes which are able to penetrate previously inaccessible organs or visualize them in improved image quality, but also allows for the addition of working channels and other features in the valuable space freed by the reduction in camera size.

Our most advanced camera is a prototype CMOS-based camera measuring only 0.99 mm in diameter transmitting 45,000 pixels in HDMI format, which we believe to be the smallest video camera ever produced. This camera is based on “through-silicon-via” technology whereby the electronics pass vertically through the sensor, permitting smaller diameter devices. This prototype camera will not be commercially available in the foreseeable future.

34

Other ProductsAlgomizer Ltd.

 

We have utilizedcurrently own a minority stake in Algomizer and Linkury, which operates in the MUSE™ systemfield of software development, marketing and distribution to internet users. Algomizer recently announced its intention to focus its efforts on Linkury Ltd, its subsidiary, which is the main source of Algomizer’s revenues and operations, with a goal of expanding its product portfolio in the field of technological platformsolutions for advertising and media. In the developmentcoming year, Algomizer plans to launch new products in the sector of prototypes for other endoscopyadvertising technologies and direct vision products, including a device aiding colonoscopy, a device usedmobile. Furthermore, Algomizer continues its efforts to seek opportunities of engaging in dental surgeryacquisitions of companies with significant revenues and others. To date,commercial potential.

Matomy Media Group Ltd.

In addition, we have not yet applied for regulatory approvals for these devices, nor have we entered into agreements forhold approximately 24.99% of Matomy’s outstanding share capital. Matomy is dually listed on the commercialization of these devices.London and Tel Aviv Stock Exchanges.

 

Our strategyStrategy

 

Our primary goal is to generate recurring revenues by driving sales ofpursuing potential opportunities to sell our MUSE‎MUSE‎ system and establishing it as the standard-of-care procedure and device technology, or alternatively grant a license or licenses for the treatmentuse of moderate to severe GERD. We believe that we can achieve this goal by continuing to accumulate clinical data and promote reimbursement for the procedure in the principal markets of North America, Europe and Asia.MUSE technology. Our strategy includes the following key elements:

 

DrivingSell or License MUSE‎‎ System Sales technology. We intendOur board of directors has determined to continueexamine potential opportunities to focus on commercializingsell our MUSE technology, or alternatively grant a license or licenses for the use of the MUSETM system in key geographies and markets. Our distribution network continues to expand for further commercialization. During 2017, we entered into additional European distribution agreements in Spain, Germany Switzerland and Liechtenstein. In the U.S. we will look for partners to market the MUSE‎™‎ at key institutions. In addition, we have successfully completed the technical testing for CFDA approval in China and have already begun the necessary clinical trial with anticipated completion of the trial in 2018.technology.

 

CollaboratingGeneral Pursuit of Opportunities. Our board of directors and co-developing with established companies. We seekmanagement are constantly seeking and pursuing opportunities through which to initiate co-development or licensing collaborations with leading companies which have existing marketing channels or significant marketing power in critical geographiesleverage our assets and sales channels.

Out-licensing our products.We may consider plans to issue a license for various endoscopic systems which are based on owned and patent-protected technology which has been developed by us. We continue to work to engage in agreements with companies which produce and market medical devices, to include the production of systems for the foregoing companies which will be integrated by them in the endoscopic systems which they produce or that we will develop or produce for them.

Developing additional products. Additionally, we intend to develop other products which will be based on the integrated and platform technology which we have developed to date, including our miniaturized visualization imaging products, combined with our flexible stapling platform, similar to the MUSE™ system. Additional products could include a fully integrated, endoscopic platform designed for endoscopic surgical tissue dissection or for endoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.capabilities.

 

Substantially allmaterial portion of our revenues in recent years are based onwas derived from the sale of miniature cameras which we developis currently developed and manufacture.manufactured by ScoutCam Inc. The following data reflects our total revenue arising from the following services:

  

  Revenues 
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2017  2016  2015 
  (Thousands of U.S. dollars) 
Sales of Miniature Cameras and related equipment  306   449   558 
Sales of the MUSE‎™‎ System  161   100   66 
Total  467   549   624 

  Revenues 
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2019  2018  2017 
  (Thousands of U.S. dollars) 
Sales of Miniature Cameras and related equipment  188   175   306 
Development services  85   217   - 
Sales of the MUSE‎‎ System  -   44   161 
Total  273   436   467 
35

The following data reflects our total revenue broken down by geographic region:

 

 Revenues  Revenues 
 Year Ended December 31,  Year Ended December 31, 
 2017  2016  2015  2019  2018  2017 
 (Thousands of U.S. dollars)  (Thousands of U.S. dollars) 
United States  115   345   446   138   315   115 
Europe  193   53   105   69   63   193 
Asia  116   5   51   22   36   116 
Other  43   146   22   44   22   43 
Total  467   549   624   273   436   467 

 

Seasonality of Business

 

During the last few years we have not seen any seasonality in our sales.

 

Raw Materials and Suppliers

The main raw materials required for the assembly and production of our various products mainly include electronic components, mechanical components, lighting components, tubes, lenses, sensors and cables, which we purchase from various suppliers and subcontractors in Israel and around the world.

We generally engage with our suppliers and subcontractors in routine purchase orders for the performance of specific orders of goods, and not via long-term contracts. We are not required to provide collateral of any kind with respect to our orders, though occasionally we have to pay some, or all, of the purchase order amount up front. The payment is usually made in various currencies as agreed by the parties.

Though we attempt to ensure the availability of more than one supplier for each important component in our products, the number of suppliers engaged in the provision of miniature video sensors which are suitable for our CMOS technology products is very limited, and therefore in some cases we engage with a single supplier, which may result in dependency on such supplier. This is the case regarding sensors for the CMOS type technology that is produced by a single supplier in the United States. As we do not have a contract in place with this supplier, there is no contractual commitment on the part of such supplier for any set quantity of such sensors. The loss of our sole supplier in providing us with miniature sensors for our CMOS technology products, and our inability or delay in finding a suitable replacement supplier, could significantly affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and reputation.

In general, alternative suppliers can be trained within a short period. However, we do have a small number of suppliers who the replacement of which could be longer, due to the adjustment of their products to our needs.

Marketing and Distribution

 

Company Sales and Marketing EffortsSale or License of MUSE System

 

InAs part of our board of directors decision to examine potential opportunities to sell our MUSE technology, or alternatively grant a license or licenses for the United States, Europeuse of the MUSE technology, our board of directors has reexamined the efforts and China,resources previously invested by us in our commercial goalsMUSE technology distribution agreements as well as the revenues obtained through such agreements in order to assess their financial viability. As a result of this analysis, our board of directors resolved to terminate our distribution agreements in order to redirect our resources to securing licensing agreements, which may in turn generate significant income in the short term, are to initiate highly selective sites for procedural experience. We will support these physiciansreduce operating expenses and hospitals through a number of activities, including: marketing materials to help drive GERD patient awareness, hands-on training, animations, procedure simulator, attendance at key physician society meetings and trade shows, training courses, reimbursement analysis, and procedural assistance.

lower the Company’s burn rate.

Engagement in External Distribution Agreements for the MUSE™ System

We currently have distribution agreements with local distributors in Italy, Spain, Switzerland and Liechtenstein, Germany and Chinafor the distribution of the MUSE™ system, (in China the distribution arrangement is pending achievement of regulatory clearance for the MUSE™ system). To date, a few commercial procedures have been performed for treatment of GERD using the MUSE™ system, which were provided in accordance with distribution agreements.

36

In general, the distribution agreements with respect to the MUSE™ system are uniform and provide the following:

The distributor serves as the exclusive distributor in the territory relevant to the agreement;

The distributor must obtain all local approvals required to import and market the systems in the relevant country;

A distribution period of one to several years is determined;

The distributor undertakes to market the systems in accordance with an annual plan coordinated with us, and serves as a service center for the systems in that country; and

The distributor undertakes to purchase a minimum quantity of systems throughout the preliminary period of the agreement.

Marketing of Imaging Equipment

With respect to our visualization technology, we sell and market our off-the-shelf and customized products globally and also engage in co-development efforts when possible. We also maintain a dedicated web-site for our imaging products.

Intellectual Property

 

Our commercial success depends, in part, on obtaining and maintaining patent and other intellectual property protection, in the United States and internationally, for the technologies used in our products. We cannot be sure that any of our patents will be commercially useful in protecting our technology. Our commercial success also depends in part on our non-infringement of the patents or proprietary rights of third parties. The patent positions of medical device companies, including ours, can be highly uncertain and involve complex and evolving legal and factual questions. For additional information see “Item 3. Key information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property.”

 

We and ScoutCam Ltd. own 1922 U.S. patents and have filed fourthree (3) additional patent applications in the U.S. and 1 U.S. Provisional Patent Application. In addition, we own 69sixty five (65) patents that were granted in other countries, including nineten (10) European patents, which are not valid on their own unless validated in specific European countries, as indeed werewe’re validated according to our list of chosen European countries. We also have teneight (8) pending patentpatents applications outside of U.S. and one patent application with the Patent Cooperation Treaty.U.S. Our patents and any patents which may be granted under our pending patent applications, expire between 2021-2041.

Pursuant to the years 2021A&R Transfer Agreement, we transferred two patent families to ScoutCam Ltd. and 2037.received a license back to the transferred patents to be used in connection with the sale or license of MUSE. In addition, we granted to ScoutCam Ltd. a license to access, use, improve, develop, market and sell licensed intellectual property, including the right to any future versions, enhancements, improvements and derivative works of such licensed intellectual property in connection with the development and commercialization of the ScoutCam miniature video technology.

 

We cannot be sure that any patents will be granted with respect to any of our pending patent applications or with respect to any patent applications filed by us in the future. There is also a significant risk that any issued patents will have substantially narrower claims than those that are currently sought.


We also protect our proprietary technology and processes, in part, by confidentiality and invention assignment agreements with our employees, consultants, scientific advisors and other contractors. These agreements may be breached, and we may not have adequate remedies for any breach. We also rely on trade secrets to protect our product candidates. However, our trade secrets may otherwise become known or be independently discovered by competitors. To the extent that our employees, consultants, scientific advisors or other contractors use intellectual property owned by others in their work for us, disputes may arise as to the rights in related or resulting know-how and inventions.

 

On October 28, 2016, we settled all litigation and administrative proceedings with EndoChoice, Inc., or EndoChoice, including those actions pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware C.A. Nos. 15-505-LPS-CJB and C.A. No. 15-1215-LPS-CJB and the trademark opposition proceedings in the State of Israel involving Trademark Application Nos. 257172, 260433 and 262423. Under the terms of the confidential settlement, we were granted a covenant not to sue with respect to EndoChoice FUSE-related trademarks and EndoChoice was granted a non-exclusive license to our U.S. Patent No. 6,997,871 and related patents. Each party has agreed to bear its own costs and fees associated with the litigation.

37

Competition

 

The rapidly changing market for the treatment of GERD, which is comprised of pharmaceutical products, surgical procedures, medical devices and potential other treatments,device industry can be significantly affected by new product introductions and other market activities of industry participants. We believe that the principal competitive factors in our market include:

 

safety, efficacy and clinically effective performance of products;

 

product benefits, including the ability to offer users (both physicians and patients) a solution for treatment of GERD using endoscopic-based methods or other;

ease of use and comfort for the physician and patient;

 

the cost of product offerings and the availability of product coverage and reimbursement from third-party payors,payers, insurance companies and other parties;

 

the strength of acceptance and adoption by physicians and hospitals;

 

the ability to deliver new product offerings and enhanced technology to expand or improve upon existing applications through continued research and development;

 

the quality of training, services and clinical support provided to physicians and hospitals;

 

effective sales, marketing and distribution;

 

the ability to provide proprietary products protected by strong intellectual property rights; and

 

the ability to offer products that are intuitive and easy to learn and use.

 

Competition with the MUSE‎ system

 

We have several competitors in the medical device and pharmaceutical industries. Patients and physicians may opt for more established existing therapies to treat GERD, including PPI pharmaceutical treatment or laparoscopic fundoplication surgery. PPIs are currently being offered by several large pharmaceutical manufacturers, most of whom have significantly greater financial, clinical, manufacturing, marketing, distribution and technical resources and experience than we have.

 

Over the last few years a number of different medical devices and treatments have been introduced to address the “treatment gap” in GERD treatments and therapies which is found between long-term pharmaceutical therapy on one hand and surgery on the other. These devices and treatments seek to treat GERD less invasively than fundoplication and without the need for long-term use of drug therapy, and include the following options that, to our knowledge, are currently commercialized:

EsophyXTM Transoral Incisionless Fundoplication (EndoGastric Solutions) — a device to endoscopically replicate a partial fundoplication.

LINXTM Reflux Management System (Torax Medical, acquired by a Johnson and Johnson medical device company) — an implantable magnetic mechanical collar around the LES.

StrettaTM (Mederi Therapeutics) — a catheter to deliver radiofrequency energy to the lower esophageal sphincter to stimulate collagen deposition (scarring) in the LES.

GERDX (G-Surg) – An endoscopic plication device for the LES.

Due to the fact that the market is broad, it is also possible that there are additional companies who are working on the development of endoscopic devices for the treatment of GERD. However, we do not have any indications concerning any commercial product or product approaching commercialization, beyond information published publicly, from time to time, in medical journals and databases of the FDA.

38

In addition, new companies have been, and are likely to continue to be, formed to pursue opportunities in our market. For example, EndoStim Inc. is a medical device company focused on the development and commercialization of a neurostimulation system for the treatment of GERD, via an implant which includes electrodes which stimulates the LES through a permanent electrical current, and is intended for the treatment of GERD. The Endostim device is implanted in the body by means of a laparoscopic surgery.

There is also a relatively new surgical technology without the use of a dedicated device, called Anti-Reflux Mucosectomy to treat GERD.

Competition with Miniature Video Camerastherapy.

The main devices that compete with our miniature cameras are manufactured by Awaiba, Fujikura, MicroCam (Sanovas), Precision Optics, Opcom, Misumi and FISBA. The miniature cameras of each of these vendors differ in various factors include image quality and resolution, camera shape and dimensions, sensor technology, optic characteristics, and user flexibility/customization.

 

Government Regulation

 

The healthcare industry, and thus our business, is subject to extensive federal, state, local and foreign regulation. Some of the pertinent laws have not been definitively interpreted by the regulatory authorities or the courts, and their provisions are open to a variety of interpretations. In addition, these laws and their interpretations are subject to change.

 

Both federal and state governmental agencies continue to subject the healthcare industry to intense regulatory scrutiny, including heightened civil and criminal enforcement efforts. As indicated by work plans and reports issued by these agencies, the federal government will continue to scrutinize, among other things, the billing practices of healthcare providers and the marketing of healthcare products.


We believe that we have structured our business operations and relationships with our customers to comply with all applicable legal requirements. However, it is possible that governmental entities or other third parties could interpret these laws differently and assert otherwise. In addition, because there is a risk that our products are used off label, we believe we are subject to increased risk of prosecution under these laws and by these entities even if we believe we are acting appropriately. We discuss below the statutes and regulations that are most relevant to our business and most frequently cited in enforcement actions.

 

U.S. Food and Drug Administration

 

All of our medical device products sold in the U.S. are subject to regulation as medical devices under the FDA, as implemented and enforced by the FDA. The FDA governs the following activities that we perform or that are performed on our behalf, to ensure that medical products we manufacture, promote and distribute domestically or export internationally are safe and effective for their intended uses:

 

product design, preclinical and clinical development and manufacture;

 

product premarket clearance and approval;

 

product safety, testing, labeling and storage;

 

record keeping procedures;

 

product marketing, sales and distribution; and

 

post-marketing surveillance, complaint handling, medical device reporting, reporting of deaths, serious injuries or device malfunctions and repair or recall of products.

 

39

FDA Premarket Clearance and Approval Requirements

 

Unless an exemption applies, each medical device we wish to commercially distribute in the United States will require either premarket notification, or 510(k) marketing clearance or approval of a premarket approval application, or PMA, from the FDA. The FDA classifies medical devices into one of three classes. Class I devices, considered to have the lowest risk, are those for which safety and effectiveness can be assured by adherence to the FDA’s general regulatory controls for medical devices, which include compliance with the applicable portions of the Quality System Regulation, facility registration and product listing, reporting of adverse medical events, and appropriate, truthful and non-misleading labeling, advertising, and promotional materials (General Controls). Class II devices are subject to the FDA’s General Controls, and any other special controls as deemed necessary by the FDA to ensure the safety and effectiveness of the device (Special Controls). Manufacturers of most class II and some class I devices are required to submit to the FDA a premarket notification under Section 510(k) of the FDCA requesting permission to commercially distribute the device. This process is generally known as 510(k) marketing clearance. Devices deemed by the FDA to pose the greatest risks, such as life sustaining, life supporting or some implantable devices, or devices that have a new intended use, or use advanced technology that is not substantially equivalent to that of a legally marketed device, are placed in class III, requiring approval of a PMA.

 

510(k) Marketing Clearance Pathway

 

To obtain 510(k) marketing clearance, we must submit a premarket notification demonstrating that the proposed device is “substantially equivalent” to a legally marketed “predicate device” that is either in class I or class II, or to a class III device that was in commercial distribution before May 28, 1976 for which the FDA has not yet called for the submission of a PMA. A Special 510(k) is an abbreviated 510(k) application which can be used to obtain clearance for certain types of device modification such as modifications that do not affect the intended use of the device or alter the device’s fundamental scientific technology. A Special 510(k) generally requires less information and data than a complete, or Traditional 510(k). In addition, a Special 510(k) application often takes a shorter period of time, which could be as short as 30 days, than a Traditional 510(k) marketing clearance application, which can be used for any type of 510(k) device. The FDA’s 510(k) marketing clearance pathway usually takes from three to twelve months, but may take significantly longer. The FDA may require additional information, including clinical data, to make a determination regarding substantial equivalence. There is no guarantee that the FDA will grant 510(k) marketing clearance for our future products and failure to obtain necessary clearances for our future products would adversely affect our ability to grow our business.

 

The FDA is currently considering proposals to reform its 510(k) marketing clearance process and such proposals could include increased requirements for clinical data and a longer review period. In response to industry and healthcare provider concerns regarding the predictability, consistency and rigor of the 510(k) regulatory pathway, the FDA initiated an evaluation of the 510(k) program, and in January 2011, announced several proposed actions intended to reform the review process governing the clearance of medical devices. The FDA intends these reform actions to improve the efficiency and transparency of the clearance process, as well as bolster patient safety. For example, in July 2011, the FDA issued a draft guidance document entitled “510(k) Device Modifications: Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device,” which was intended to assist manufacturers in deciding whether to submit a new 510(k) for changes or modifications made to the manufacturer’s previously cleared device. While this draft guidance was subsequently withdrawn, the FDA is expected to replace the 1997 guidance document on the same topic. As part of FDASIA, Congress reauthorized the Medical Device User Fee Amendments with various FDA performance goal commitments and enacted several “Medical Device Regulatory Improvements” and miscellaneous reforms which are further intended to clarify and improve medical device regulation both pre- and post-approval. One of these provisions obligates the FDA to prepare a report for Congress on the FDA’s approach for determining when a new 510(k) will be required for modifications or changes to a previously cleared device. After submitting this report, the FDA is expected to issue revised guidance to assist device manufacturers in making this determination. Until then, manufacturers may continue to adhere to the FDA’s 1997 guidance on this topic when making a determination as to whether or not a new 510(k) is required for a change or modification to a device, but the practical impact of the FDA’s continuing scrutiny of these issues remains unclear. It is possible that any new guidance will make substantive changes to existing policy and practice regarding the assessment of whether a new 510(k) is required for changes or modifications to existing devices. Specifically, industry has interpreted the withdrawn draft guidance to take a more conservative approach in requiring a new 510(k) for certain changes or modifications to existing, cleared devices that might not have triggered a new 510(k) under the 1997 guidance. As of July 28, 2014, the FDA released final guidance entitled “The 510(k) Program: Evaluating Substantial Equivalence in Premarket Notifications” which is intended to identify, explain, and clarify each of the critical decision points in the decision-making process FDA uses to determine substantial equivalence. We cannot predict which of the 510(k) marketing clearance reforms currently being discussed or proposed might be enacted, finalized or implemented by the FDA and whether the FDA will propose additional modifications to the regulations governing medical devices in the future. Any such modification could have a material adverse effect on our ability to commercialize our products.

40

Medical devices can be marketed only for the indications for which they are cleared or approved. After a device receives 510(k) marketing clearance, any modification that could significantly affect its safety or effectiveness, or that would constitute a new or major change in its intended use, will require a new 510(k) marketing clearance or, depending on the modification, PMA approval. The FDA requires each manufacturer to determine whether the proposed changes requires submission of a 510(k) or a PMA, but the FDA can review any such decision and can disagree with a manufacturer’s determination. If the FDA disagrees with a manufacturer’s determination, the FDA can require the manufacturer to cease marketing or recall the modified device until 510(k) marketing clearance or PMA approval is obtained. Also, in these circumstances, we may be subject to significant regulatory fines or penalties. We have made and plan to continue to make, additional product enhancements to MUSE™MUSE system and other products that we believe do not require new 510(k) marketing clearances. We cannot be assured that the FDA would agree with any of our decisions not to seek 510(k) marketing clearance or PMA approval. For risks related to 510(k) marketing clearance, see “Item 3. Key information—D. Risk Factors – Risks Related to Regulatory Compliance.”

 

PMA Approval Pathway

 

A PMA must be submitted to the FDA if the device cannot be cleared through the 510(k) process or is not otherwise exempt from the FDA’s premarket clearance and approval requirements. A PMA must generally be supported by extensive data, including, but not limited to, technical, preclinical, clinical trials, manufacturing and labeling, to demonstrate to the FDA’s satisfaction the safety and effectiveness of the device for its intended use. Also, an advisory panel of experts from outside the FDA may be convened to review and evaluate the application and provide recommendations to the FDA as to the approvability of the device. The FDA may or may not accept the panel’s recommendation. In addition, the FDA will generally conduct a pre-approval inspection of the applicant or its third-party manufacturers’ or suppliers’ manufacturing facility or facilities to ensure compliance with the QSR.

 

New PMAs or PMA supplements are required for modifications that affect the safety or effectiveness of the device, including, for example, certain types of modifications to the device’s indication for use, manufacturing process, labeling and design. PMA supplements often require submission of the same type of information as a PMA, except that the supplement is limited to information needed to support any changes from the device covered by the original PMA and may not require as extensive clinical data or the convening of an advisory panel. None of our products are currently approved under a PMA approval. However, we may in the future develop devices which will require the approval of a PMA. There is no guarantee that the FDA will grant PMA approval of our future products and failure to obtain necessary approvals for our future products would adversely affect our ability to grow our business.

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are generally required to support a PMA application and are sometimes required for 510(k) marketing clearance. Such trials generally require an Investigational Device Exemption application, or IDE, approved in advance by the FDA for a specified number of patients and study sites, unless the product is deemed a non-significant risk device eligible for more abbreviated IDE requirements. A significant risk device is one that presents a potential for serious risk to the health, safety or welfare of a patient and either is implanted, used in supporting or sustaining human life, substantially important in diagnosing, curing, mitigating or treating disease or otherwise preventing impairment of human health, or otherwise presents a potential for serious risk to a subject. Clinical trials are subject to extensive monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting requirements. Clinical trials must be conducted under the oversight of an Institutional Review Board, or IRB, for the relevant clinical trial sites and must comply with FDA regulations, including but not limited to those relating to good clinical practices. To conduct a clinical trial, we are also required to obtain the patient’s informed consent in form and substance that complies with both FDA requirements and state and federal privacy and human subject protection regulations. We, the FDA or the IRB could suspend a clinical trial at any time for various reasons, including a belief that the risks to study subjects outweigh the anticipated benefits. Even if a trial is completed, the results of clinical testing may not adequately demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the device or may otherwise not be sufficient to obtain FDA clearance or approval to market the product in the United States. Similarly, in Europe the clinical study must be approved by a local ethics committee and in some cases, including studies with high-risk devices, by the ministry of health in the applicable country.

41

Pervasive and Continuing Regulation

 

After a device is placed on the market, numerous regulatory requirements continue to apply. In addition to the requirements below, the Medical Device Reporting, or MDR, regulations require that we report to the FDA any incident in which our products may have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury or in which our product malfunctioned and, if the malfunction were to recur, would likely cause or contribute to death or serious injury. See “Item 4. Information on the Company —D. Risk Factors – Risks Related to Regulatory Compliance,” for further information regarding our reporting obligations under MDR regulations. Additional regulatory requirements include:

 

product listing and establishment registration, which helps facilitate FDA inspections and other regulatory action;

 

QSR, which requires manufacturers, including third-party manufacturers, to follow stringent design, testing, control, documentation and other quality assurance procedures during all phases of the design and manufacturing process;

                 ��      

labeling regulations and FDA prohibitions against the promotion of products for uncleared, unapproved or off-label use or indication;

                 

clearance of product modifications that could significantly affect safety or efficacy or that would constitute a major change in intended use of one of our cleared devices;

                 

approval of product modifications that affect the safety or effectiveness of one of our approved devices;

                 

post-approval restrictions or conditions, including post-approval study commitments;

 


post-market surveillance regulations, which apply, when necessary, to protect the public health or to provide additional safety and effectiveness data for the device;

                 

the FDA’s recall authority, whereby it can ask, or under certain conditions order, device manufacturers to recall from the market a product that is in violation of governing laws and regulations; and

   

notices of corrections or removals.

 

We must also register with the FDA as a medical device manufacturer and must obtain all necessary state permits or licenses to operate our business.

 

Failure to comply with applicable regulatory requirements, including delays in or failures to report incidents to the FDA as required under the MDR regulations, can result in enforcement action by the FDA, which may include any of the following sanctions:

 

warning letters, fines, injunctions, consent decrees and civil penalties;

  

customer notifications or repair, replacement, refunds, recall, detention or seizure of our products;

 

 42

operating restrictions or partial suspension or total shutdown of production;

  

refusing or delaying requests for 510(k) marketing clearance or PMA approvals of new products or modified products;

  

withdrawing 510(k) marketing clearances or PMA approvals that have already been granted;

  

refusal to grant export approval for our products; or

  

criminal prosecution.

 

In January 2016, we performed an FDA mock audit by an FDA veteran specialist, following which we implemented improvements in our quality management system. We cannot be assured that we have adequately complied with all regulatory requirements or that one or more of the referenced sanctions will not be applied to us as a result of a failure to comply.

 

Marketing Approvals Outside the United States

 

Sales of medical devices outside the United States are subject to foreign government regulations, which vary substantially from country to country. The time required to obtain approval by a foreign country may be longer or shorter than that required for FDA clearance or approval, and the requirements may differ.

 

The European Union has adopted numerous directives and standards regulating the design, manufacture, clinical trials, labeling and adverse event reporting for medical devices. Each European Union member state has implemented legislation applying these directives and standards at the national level. Other countries, such as Switzerland, have voluntarily adopted laws and regulations that mirror those of the European Union with respect to medical devices. Devices that comply with the requirements of the laws of the relevant member state applying the applicable European Union directive are entitled to bear CE conformity marking and, accordingly, can be commercially distributed throughout the member states of the European Union and other countries that comply with or mirror these directives. The method of assessing conformity varies depending on the type and class of the product, but normally involves a combination of self-assessment by the manufacturer and a third-party assessment by a “Notified Body,” an independent and neutral institution appointed to conduct conformity assessment. This third-party assessment consists of an audit of the manufacturer’s quality system and clinical information, as well as technical review of the manufacturer’s product. An assessment by a Notified Body in one country within the European Union is required in order for a manufacturer to commercially distribute the product throughout the European Union. In addition, compliance with ISO 13845 on quality systems issued by the International Organization for Standards, among other standards, establishes the presumption of conformity with the essential requirements for a CE marking. In addition, many countries apply requirements in their reimbursement, pricing or health care systems that affect companies’ ability to market products.

 


We have been authorized by Health Canada and have received AMAR approval in Israel. In addition, we received approval form the MedCert Zertifizierungs und Prufungsgsesellschaft fur die Medizin GmbH of Germany, and are entitled to print the CE Mark on our products, after having examined the EU Technical File for each new product.

 

Health Care Laws and Regulations

Reimbursement

In the United States and elsewhere, health care providers that perform surgical procedures using medical devices such as ours generally rely on third-party payors, including governmental payors such as Medicare and Medicaid and private payors, to cover and reimburse the associated medical and surgical costs. Consequently, sales of medical devices are dependent in part on the availability of reimbursement to the customer from third-party payors. The manner in which reimbursement is sought and obtained varies based upon the type of payor involved and the setting in which the product is furnished and utilized. In general, third-party payors will provide coverage and reimbursement for medically reasonable and necessary procedures and tests that utilize medical devices and may provide separate payments for the implanted or disposable devices themselves. Most payors, however, will not pay separately for capital equipment. Instead, payment for the cost of using the capital equipment is considered to be covered as part of payments received for performing the procedure. In determining payment rates, third-party payors are increasingly scrutinizing the prices charged for medical products and services in comparison to other therapies. The procedures in which our products are used may not be reimbursed by these third-party payors at rates sufficient to allow us to sell our products on a competitive and profitable basis.

43

In addition, in many foreign markets, including the countries in the European Union, pricing of medical devices is subject to governmental control. In the United States, there have been, and we expect that there will continue to be, a number of federal and state proposals to limit payments by governmental payors for medical devices, and the procedures in which medical devices are used.

In March 2010, comprehensive health care reform legislation was enacted through the passage of the Affordable Care Act of 2010. Significant measures contained in the health care reform legislation include initiatives to revise Medicare payment methodologies, initiatives to promote quality indicators in payment methodologies (including the bundling of hospital and physician payments), initiatives related to the coordination and promotion of research on comparative clinical effectiveness of different technologies and procedures, and annual reporting requirements related to payments to physicians and teaching hospitals. At this time it is not possible to predict whether these initiatives will have a positive or negative impact on us. The health care reform legislation also includes new taxes impacting certain health-related industries, including medical device manufacturers. As of 2013, each medical device manufacturer or importer has to pay an excise tax (or sales tax) in an amount equal to 2.3% of the price for which such manufacturer sells its medical devices. In addition to the health care reform legislation, various healthcare reform proposals have also emerged at the state level. We cannot predict whether future healthcare initiatives will be implemented at the federal or state level or internationally, or the effect any future legislation or regulation will have on us. The taxes imposed by the health care reform legislation and the expansion in government’s role in the U.S. healthcare industry may result in decreased profits to us, lower reimbursements by payors for our products, and reduced medical procedure volumes, all of which may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations, possibly materially.

Medicare and Medicaid

The Medicare program is a federal health benefit program administered by the CMS that covers and pays for certain medical care items and services for eligible elderly persons. The Medicaid program is a federal-state partnership under which states receive matching federal payments to fund healthcare services for the poor.In January 2018, the American Medical Association’s, or the AMA, Current Procedural Terminology, or CPT, published an updated payment for Category I CPT Code for transoral esophagogastric fundoplasty procedures, which describes procedures conducted with the MUSE™ system. In the U.S., the CPT Editorial Panel assigns specific billing codes for physician services and outpatient hospital procedures, which are used by providers, who are our customers, to bill for procedures. Once a CPT code is established, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, or CMS, in turn establishes payment levels and coverage rules under Medicare, and private payors establish rates and coverage rules. Notwithstanding the issuance of a CPT to report the MUSE procedure and the establishment of payment rates for the code, we cannot guarantee that the MUSE™ system is or will be covered and, if covered, that reimbursement will be sufficient, and furthermore, we cannot guarantee that the MUSE™ system or any future product will be approved for coverage or reimbursement by Medicare, Medicaid or any third-party payor. Reimbursement decisions in the European Union and in other jurisdictions outside of the United States vary by country and region and there can be no assurance that we will be successful in obtaining adequate reimbursement.

Commercial Insurers

Many private payors look to CMS policies as a guideline in setting their coverage policies and payment amounts. A decrease of, or limitation on, reimbursement payments for physicians and hospitals by CMS or other agencies may affect coverage and reimbursement determinations by many private payors. Additionally, some private payors may reimburse only a portion of the costs associated with the use of our products, or not at all.

44

Fraud and Abuse Laws

Because of the significant federal funding involved in Medicare and Medicaid, Congress and the states have enacted, and actively enforce, a number of laws whose purpose is to eliminate fraud and abuse in federal health care programs. Our business is subject to compliance with these laws.

Anti-Kickback Statutes and Federal False Claims Act

The federal healthcare programs’ Anti-Kickback Statute prohibits persons from soliciting, offering, receiving or providing remuneration, directly or indirectly, in exchange for or to induce either the referral of an individual, or the furnishing or arranging for a good or service, for which payment may be made under a federal healthcare program such as Medicare or Medicaid. Penalties for violations include criminal penalties and civil sanctions such as fines, imprisonment and possible exclusion from Medicare, Medicaid and other federal healthcare programs. The Anti-Kickback Statute is broad and prohibits many arrangements and practices that are lawful in businesses outside of the healthcare industry. There are a number of statutory exceptions as well as regulatory safe harbors protecting certain common activities from prosecution or other regulatory sanctions, however, the exceptions and safe harbors are drawn narrowly, and practices that do not fit squarely within an exception or safe harbor may be subject to scrutiny. Many states have adopted laws similar to the Anti-Kickback Statute. Some of these state prohibitions apply to referral of patients for healthcare items or services reimbursed by any source, not only the Medicare and Medicaid programs. 

Government officials have focused their enforcement efforts on marketing of healthcare services and products, among other activities, and recently have brought cases against companies, and certain sales, marketing and executive personnel, for allegedly offering unlawful inducements to potential or existing customers in an attempt to procure their business. Another development affecting the healthcare industry is the increased use of the federal Civil False Claims Act and, in particular, actions brought pursuant to the False Claims Act’s “whistleblower” or “qui tam” provisions. The federal civil False Claims Act prohibits, among other things, individuals or entities from knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, a false or fraudulent claim for payment of government funds or knowingly making, using or causing to be made or used, a false record or statement material to an obligation to pay money to the government or knowingly concealing or knowing and improperly avoiding, decreasing or concealing an obligation to pay money to the federal government. Violation of the False Claims Act can result in significant civil and administrative penalties, up to treble damages and exclusion from participation in federal health care programs like Medicare and Medicaid. The False Claims Act also allows a private individual or entity to sue on behalf of the government. Medical device manufacturers and other health care companies have been investigated by the U.S. Department of Justice and have reached substantial financial settlements with the federal government under the civil False Claims Act for a variety of alleged improper marketing activities, including providing free product, providing consulting fees, grants, free travel and other benefits to physicians to induce them to prescribe the company’s products, and for causing false claims to be submitted as a result of the marketing of their products for unapproved, and thus non-reimbursable, uses. Resolution of such investigations has often included manufacturers entering into corporate integrity agreements with the Office of Inspector General for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services that require, among other things, substantial reporting and remedial actions.

Additionally, several bills have been passed or are pending, at both the state and federal levels that expand the anti-kickback laws to require, among other things, extensive tracking and maintenance of databases regarding relationships to physicians and healthcare providers. The PPACA imposes new reporting and disclosure requirements on device manufacturers for any “transfer of value” made or distributed to physicians and teaching hospitals, otherwise known as the Physician Payment Sunshine Act. Device manufacturers were required to begin collecting data on August 1, 2013 and were be required to submit reports to CMS by March 31, 2014 (and the 90th day of each subsequent calendar year). In addition, there has been a recent trend of increased federal and state regulation of payments made to physicians. Some states, such as California, Massachusetts and Nevada, mandate implementation of commercial compliance programs, while certain states, such as Massachusetts and Vermont, impose restrictions on device manufacturer marketing practices and tracking and reporting of gifts, compensation and other remuneration to physicians. The implementation of the infrastructure to comply with these bills and regulations could be costly and any failure to provide the required information may result in civil monetary penalties.

45

We believe our current consulting agreements with physicians represent legitimate compensation for needed documented services actually furnished to us. However, engagement of physician consultants by medical device manufacturers has recently been subject to heightened scrutiny. In this environment, our engagement of physician consultants in product development or clinical testing could subject us to similar scrutiny. We are unable to predict whether we would be subject to actions under the Anti-Kickback Statute or False Claims Act or any similar state law, or the impact of such actions.

HIPAA and Other Fraud and Privacy Regulations

Among other things, HIPAA created two new federal crimes: healthcare fraud and false statements relating to healthcare matters. The HIPAA health care fraud statute prohibits, among other things, knowingly and willfully executing, or attempting to execute, a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program, including private payors. A violation of this statute is a felony and may result in fines, imprisonment and exclusion from government sponsored programs. The HIPAA false statements statute prohibits, among other things, knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing or covering up a material fact or making any materially false, fictitious or fraudulent statement or representation in connection with the delivery of or payment for healthcare benefits, items or services. A violation of this statute is a felony and may result in fines and imprisonment.

In addition to federal regulations issued under HIPAA, some states have enacted privacy and security statutes or regulations that, in some cases, are more stringent than those issued under HIPAA. In those cases, it may be necessary to modify our planned operations and procedures to comply with the more stringent state laws. If we fail to comply with applicable state laws and regulations, we could be subject to additional sanctions.

Anti-Bribery Laws

Compliance with complex foreign and U.S. laws and regulations that apply to our international operations increases our cost of doing business in international jurisdictions and could expose us or our employees to fines and penalties in the U.S. and abroad. These numerous and sometimes conflicting laws and regulations include the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, or the FCPA. The FCPA prohibits U.S. companies, companies whose securities are listed for trading in the United States and other entities, and their officers, directors, employees, shareholders acting on their behalf and agents from offering, promising, authorizing or making payments to foreign officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business abroad or otherwise obtaining favorable treatment. The FCPA also requires companies to maintain records that fairly and accurately reflect transactions and maintain internal accounting controls. In many countries, hospitals are government-owned and healthcare professionals employed by such hospitals, with whom we regularly interact, may meet the definition of a foreign official for purposes of the FCPA. Additionally, recently enacted U.S. legislation increases the monetary reward available to whistleblowers who report violations of federal securities laws, including the FCPA, which may result in increased scrutiny and allegations of violations of these laws and regulations. Violations of these laws and regulations could result in fines, criminal sanctions against us, our officers, or our employees, prohibitions on the conduct of our business, and damage to our reputation.

Israeli Government Programs

 

Under theEncouragement of Research, Development and Technological Innovation in the Industry Law,, 5744-1984, or the Innovation Law, research and development programs which meet specified criteria and are approved by a committee of the Israeli Innovation Authority of the Israeli Ministry of Economy and Industry, or IIA (formerly known as Office of Chief Scientist, or the OCS) are eligible for grants from the IIA. The grant amounts are determined by the research committee, and are typically a percentage of the project’s expenditures. Under most programs, the grantee is required to pay royalties to the State of Israel from the sale of products developed under the program. Regulations under the Innovation Law generally provide for the payment of royalties of 3% to 6% on sales of products and services based on or incorporating technology developed using grants or know-how deriving therefrom, up to 100% of the grant, linked to the dollar and bearing interest at the LIBOR rate, is repaid. The royalty rates and the aggregate repayment amount may be higher if manufacturing rights are transferred outside of Israel, as further detailed below. The manufacturing rights of products incorporating technology developed thereunder may not be transferred outside of Israel, unless approval is received from the IIA and additional royalty payments are made to the State of Israel, as further detailed below. However, this does not restrict the export of products that incorporate the funded technology.

 

46

TableThe United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority, which regulates the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), announced in July 2017 that it will no longer persuade or require banks to submit rates for LIBOR after 2021. The grants received from the IIA bear an annual interest rate based on the 12-month LIBOR. Accordingly, there is considerable uncertainty regarding the publication of ContentsLIBOR beyond 2021. While it is not currently possible to determine precisely whether, or to what extent, the withdrawal and replacement of LIBOR would affect us, the implementation of alternative benchmark rates to LIBOR may increase our financial liabilities to the IIA.

 

The pertinent obligations under the Innovation Law are as follows:

 

 Local Manufacturing Obligation. The terms of the grants under the Innovation Law require that we manufacture the products developed with these grants in Israel. Under the regulations promulgated under the Innovation Law, the products may be manufactured outside Israel by us or by another entity only if prior approval is received from the IIA (such approval is not required for the transfer of less than 10% of the manufacturing capacity in the aggregate, in which case a notice should be provided to the IIA). As a condition to obtaining approval to manufacture outside Israel, we would be required to pay royalties at an increased rate (usually 1% in addition to the standard rate and increased royalties cap (between 120% and 300% of the grants, depending on the manufacturing volume that is performed outside Israel). We note that a company also has the option of declaring in its IIA grant applications of its intention to exercise a portion of the manufacturing capacity abroad, thus avoiding the need to obtain additional approvals and pay the increased royalties cap with respect to the portion declared.

 


 Know-How transfer limitation. The Innovation Law restricts the ability to transfer know-how funded by the IIA outside of Israel. Transfer of IIA funded know-how outside of Israel requires prior approval of IIA and in certain circumstances is subject to certain payment to the IIA, calculated according to formulae provided under the Innovation Law. If we wish to transfer IIA funded know-how, the terms for approval will be determined according to the character of the transaction and the consideration paid to us for such transfer. The IIA approval to transfer know-how created, in whole or in part, in connection with a IIA-funded project to third party outside Israel where the transferring company remains an operating Israeli entity is subject to payment of a redemption fee to the IIA calculated according to a formula provided under the Innovation Law that is based, in general, on the ratio between the aggregate IIA grants to the company’s aggregate investments in the project that was funded by these IIA grants, multiplied by the transaction consideration, considering depreciation mechanism and less royalties already paid to the IIA. The transfer of such know-how to a party outside Israel where the transferring company ceases to exist as an Israeli entity is subject to a redemption fee formula that is based, in general, on the ratio between aggregate IIA grants received by the company and the company’s aggregate research and development expenses, multiplied by the transaction consideration considering depreciation mechanism and less royalties already paid to the IIA. The regulations promulgated under the Innovation Law establish a maximum payment of the redemption fee paid to the IIA under the above mentioned formulas and differentiates between two situations: (i) in the event that the company sells its IIA funded know-how, in whole or in part, or is sold as part of an M&A transaction, and subsequently ceases to conduct business in Israel, the maximum redemption fee under the above mentioned formulas will be no more than six times the amount received (plus annual interest) for the applicable know-how being transferred, or the entire amount received from the IIA, as applicable; (ii) in the event that following the transactions described above (i.e. asset sale of IIA funded know-how or transfer as part of an M&A transaction) the company continues to conduct its research and development activity in Israel (for at least three years following such transfer and maintain staff of at least 75% of the number of research and development employees it had for the six months before the know-how was transferred and keeps the same scope of employment for such research and development staff), then the company is eligible for a reduced cap of the redemption fee of no more than three times the amounts received (plus annual interest) for the applicable know-how being transferred.

 

 Approval of the transfer of IIA funded technology to another Israeli company may be granted only if the recipient abides by the provisions of the Innovation law and related regulations, including the restrictions on the transfer of know-how and manufacturing rights outside of Israel (note that there will be an obligation to pay royalties to the IIA from the income of such sale transaction as part of the royalty payment obligation).

 

47

Approval to manufacture products outside of Israel or consent to the transfer of technology, if requested, might not be granted. Furthermore, the IIA may impose certain conditions on any arrangement under which it permits us to transfer technology or development out of Israel.

 

Grants Received from the IIA (formerly the OCS)

 

We have received grants from the IIA as part of our participation in two programs as described below:

 

Membership in the Activities of the Bio Medical Photonic Consortium

 

The Bio Medical Photonic Consortium, or the Consortium, commenced its activities in June 2007, and concluded its activities on December 31, 2012. The purpose of the Consortium was to develop generic photonic technologies in the field of diagnostics and therapeutics in the biomedical industry in Israel, and specifically on the subject of the digestive system. The activities of the Consortium were performed under our management and the management of Given Imaging Ltd., where each would develop technological models which are based on their internal developments and on developments of the members of the Consortium.

 

Within the framework of the activities of the Consortium, the Company worked to develop the next generation technology of miniature cameras. The cameras were integrated, within the framework of the Consortium, in technological models for minimally invasive procedures which were developed by the members of the Consortium. The various combinations of surgical tools and advanced visual capabilities with miniature endoscopes are innovative, and we predict that the Consortium framework will continue serving as a fruitful basis for the development of innovative medical procedures through the creation of intellectual property. Additionally, we will cooperate with research groups which develop indicators for early detection of colorectal cancer, with the aim of integrating the visualization techniques and key products in this field. The Company received an amount of approximately US $2.3 from the IIA in the framework of the Consortium.


In February 2019, the IIA approved a transfer of IIA know-how developed by the Company in the framework of the Consortium to ScoutCam Ltd., a company incorporated under the laws of the State of Israel, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. In November 2019, the IIA approved a transfer of the know-how from ScoutCam Ltd. back to the Company in exchange for a license to the ScoutCam Ltd. to access, and develop the know-how. Accordingly all rights and obligations to the IIA under the Innovation Law in connection with such know-how apply to both the Company and ScoutCam Ltd.

 

The following are details regarding the rights and obligations within the framework of our activity in the Consortium, which continuewill apply to applythe Company and the indirect subsidiary notwithstanding the conclusion of the program:

 

 (i)The property rights to information which has been developed belongs to the Consortium member that developed it. However, the developing entity is obligated to provide the other members in the Consortium a license for the use of the new information, without consideration, provided that the other members do not transfer such information to any entity which is not a member of the Consortium. The provision of a license or of the right to use the new information to a third party is subject to approval by the administration of the MAGNET Program at the IIA;

 

 (ii)We areThe Consortium member is entitled to register a patent for the new information which has been developed by it within the framework of its activity in the Consortium. The foregoing registration does not require approval from the administration; and

 

 (iii)The know-how and technology developed under the program is subject to the restrictions set forth under the Innovation Law, including restrictions on the transfer of such know-how and any manufacturing rights with respect thereto, without first obtaining the approval of the IIA. Such approval may entail additional payments to the IIA, as determined under the Innovation Law and regulations, and as further detailed above.

 

Collaboration Grant for the Development of a Miniature Diameter Endoscope for Use in Dental Implants

 

In July 2011, the IIA approved our application for support for a joint project regarding the development of an innovative, miniature diameter endoscopic product in the field of dental surgery, or the Dental Project. In October 2012, the Company received a notice according to which approval was given for continued support for the Dental Project for a second year. The IIA support for the Dental Project concluded on July 31, 2013.

 

The Dental Project was performed in collaboration with Qioptiq GmbH, a German corporation, or Qioptiq, in the field of sophisticated medical micro-optics, including in the medical and life sciences sector. The collaboration between the Company and Qioptiq was performed within the framework of the Eureka organization, a Pan-European organization which includes approximately 40 member states, including the State of Israel, and which acts to coordinate and to finance research and development enterprises in and outside of Europe.

 

48

In accordance with the outline of the Dental Project, we and Qioptiq collaborated on the development of an innovative miniature-diameter endoscope, with side viewing capabilities, intended for use in various dental implant procedures, the Dental Endoscope. During the Dental Project, each of the parties developed different parts of the Dental Endoscope. In accordance with the terms of the collaboration, the intellectual property which originated from the development of the Dental Endoscope remained the exclusive property of the party which developed it. Subject to the completion of the project, the parties agreed to conduct negotiations regarding the method used to produce and market the Product (theProduct. The foregoing negotiations have not yet been conducted andconducted. In January 2019 we have notified the IIA that the Dental Project has failed due to technological reasons and that there are no revenues to be expected from this project).project.

  

Implantation procedures are complex, and in many cases, damage is caused to the tissue of the mouth and the jaw due to the dentist’s inability to see the entire operating area. The Dental Endoscope is intended to allow improved visual monitoring of the surgical procedure using a miniature video camera which has been developed by us, which is installed on the edge of the endoscope, thereby significantly reducing the risk to the patient. It is estimated that hundreds of thousands of procedures of the kind for which the product is intended are performed each year in Europe. Construction of a prototype for the product concluded in November 2012. The prototype is intended for use in pre-clinical trials and in human clinical trials.

As of the date hereof, there is no certainty that it will be possible to produce and market the product, which may be developed or that the regulatory approvals required for the product’s marketing will be received. At present, we and Qioptiq are not acting to commercialize the Dental Project.

Grants and Royalty Obligations

 

We received various grants from the IIA in connection with our participation in its programs. We received a grant of approximately $2.3 million in connection with our participation in the Bio Medical Photonics Consortium in the production of generic technology related to the partial development of miniature or the Consortium Grant. Under the terms of the Consortium Grant we are not required to pay royalties. In addition, we received a grant of approximately $0.2 million in connection with a collaboration within the framework of the Eureka organization related to miniature endoscope for dental implants, or the Eureka Grant. Under the terms of the Eureka Grant, we would have to pay royalties at a rate of 3%-5% from the actual sales of the relevant device, up to the repayment of the grant, with the addition of interest and linkage. As of December 31, 2016, thereIn January 2018 we have been no salesnotified the IIA that requires us to pay royalties underthe project that received the Eureka Grant has failed due to technological reasons and we believe that the probability we could generate incomethere are no revenues to be expected from the miniature endoscope for dental implants is low.this project.

 


C.Organizational Structure

 

We currently have one wholly owned subsidiary:subsidiary, Medigus USA LLC, a limited liability company, incorporated in the State of Delaware, United States.States, and two majority held subsidiaries, (i) ScoutCam Inc., a corporation incorporated in the State of Nevada, United states in which we hold approximately 56% of its outstanding share capital; (ii) GERD IP, a corporation incorporated in the State of Delaware, United States in which we hold 90% of its outstanding share capital. We currently own minority stakes in Algomizer Ltd., a company incorporated under the laws of the State of Israel, in which we hold approximately 8.22% of its outstanding share capital, Linkury Ltd. a company incorporated under the laws of the State of Israel, in which we hold approximately 9.34% of its outstanding share capital, and Matomy Media Group Ltd., a company incorporated under the laws of the State of Israel, in which we hold approximately 24.99% of its outstanding share capital.

 

D.Property, Plant and Equipment

  

Our offices and main research and development facility are located at Omer Industrial Park, No. 7A, P.O. Box 3030, Omer 8496500 Israel, where we occupy approximately 807 square meters. We leaseleased our facilities and ourpursuant to a lease ends onagreement which terminated as of December 31, 2018.2019. The lease has been recently renewed by ScoutCam Ltd., and we will sub-lease/participate in the lease costs in accordance with our usage of the space. The arrangement regarding the allocation of lease costs between Medigus and ScoutCam Ltd. are set out in an Amended and Restated Inter Company Services Agreement entered into by the parties on April 19, 2020.

 

We consider that our current office space is sufficient to meet our anticipated needs for the foreseeable future and is suitable for the conduct of our business. We have no current plans to construct, expend or improve our facilities.

 

49

ITEM 4A.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

 

Not applicable.

  

ITEM 5.OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS

 

The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with “Item 3. Key Information—Selected Financial Data” and our consolidated financial statements and the related notes to those statements included elsewhere in this annual report. In addition to historical consolidated financial information, the following discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Our actual results and timing of selected events may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of many factors, including those discussed under “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this annual report.

 

The audited consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162019 and 20152018 in this Annual Reportannual report have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards, which are standards and interpretations thereto issued by the International Accounting Standard Board.

For the purpose of this Item 5., references to “Medigus”, the “Company”, “us”, “we” and “our” refer to Medigus and its consolidated subsidiaries.

 

41

Overview

 

WeOur Israeli subsidiary, ScoutCam Ltd. and our Nevada subsidiary ScoutCam Inc. are aengaged in the development, production and marketing of innovative miniaturized imaging equipment known as our micro ScoutCamportfolio for use in medical device company specializingprocedures as well as various industrial applications.

In addition, we have been engaged in developingthe development, production and marketing of innovative endoscopic procedures and devices. We are a developer of a unique proprietary endoscopic systemsurgical devices with direct visualization capabilities for the treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, or GERD, a common ailment, which is predominantly treated by medical therapy (e.g. proton pump inhibitors) or in chronic disease. We have an advancedcases, conventional open or laparoscopic surgery. Our board of directors has determined to examine potential opportunities to sell our MUSE technology, platformor alternatively grant a license or licenses for performing a wide rangethe use of endoscopic procedures. The platform includes various types of rigid, semi-flexible and flexible video endoscopes, as well as respective endoscopy suites.the MUSEtechnology.

 

From ourTo date, of incorporation, we have invested the majority of our research and development efforts on the MUSE™ system, intended for the minimally invasive and endoscopic treatment of GERD, one of the most widespread chronic diseases in the western world. The MUSE™ system has also been given marketing approval by the FDA through the 510(k) track and bears a CE mark, as required in order to market the system in European Union countries. In addition, we haveobtained the necessary license to market the product in Canada, Turkey and Israel, and we are also in the process of obtaining regulatory approvals in China.

While at present significantsubstantially material portion of our revenue is stillrevenues have derived from our micro ScoutCam portfolio for use within the miniature cameramedical and related equipment, our strategy is focused on the development and promotion of our MUSETM System.industrial fields.

 

We have incurred net losses each year since inception. The Company’s accumulated deficit as of December 31, 20172019 aggregated to approximately $55.9$76.7 million. We anticipate that we are likely to continue to incur significant net losses for at least the next several years as we continue the development of the MUSE™ systemour products and potentially other products, expand our sales and marketing capabilities in the endoscopy-based products market, continue the commercialization of the MUSE™ system and work to expand its adoption and clinical implementation, and continue to develop the corporate infrastructure required to sell and market our products.

 

Recent business events and key milestones in the development of our business, include the following:

 

In November 2017,July 2018, pursuant to a shelf prospectusregistration statement in the United States, we raised approximately $1.62$10 million (gross) through the issuance of ADSs and warrants. See “Item 10. Additional Information – C. Material Contracts.”

 

On September 20, 2018, the annual general meeting of the shareholders has determined to replace the then serving directors with our current directors.
On January 3, 2019, we formed a wholly owned subsidiary in Israel under the name ScoutCam Ltd., or ScoutCam. ScoutCam was incorporated as part of a reorganization of the Company intended to distinguish the Company’s miniaturized imaging business, or the micro ScoutCam portfolio, from the other operations of the Company and to enable the Company to form a separate business unit with dedicated resources focused on the promotion of such technology.
On June 3, 2019 we entered into a Licensing and Sale Agreement with Shanghai Golden Grand-Medical Instruments Ltd. (Golden Grand) for the know-how licensing and sale of good relating to the Medigus Ultrasonic Surgical Endostapler (MUSE) system in China, Hong Kong, Taiwan and Macao. Under the agreement, we committed to provide a license, training services and goods to Golden Grand in consideration for $3,000,000 to be paid to us in four milestone based installments. To date, some of these milestones have been achieved and the Company has received $1,800,000. The final milestone shall be completed and the final installment paid upon completion of a MUSE assembly line in China.
On September 3, 2019 we consummated an investment agreement in Algomizer and its wholly owned subsidiary Linkury, for an aggregate investment of $5,000,000. The investment agreement contains customary provisions and warranties, and provides for us to invest NIS 5.4 million directly in Algomizer, which engages in internet advertising and whose shares are traded on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange. The investment was made at a price per Algomizer share of NIS 4.15. We invested an additional NIS 9 million through a direct acquisition of the shares of Linkury from Algomizer, at a company valuation of Linkury of approximately NIS 96 million. We further invested an additional $1 million in Algomizer through equity exchange by issuing Algomizer American Depositary Shares (ADRs) at a price of $3 per ADR in consideration for Algomizer shares based on a price per Algomizer share of NIS 4.15. In March 2017, pursuantaddition, we issued Algomizer warrants to a registration statementpurchase our ADRs in an amount equal to the United States, we raised approximately $7.5 million (gross) through the issuanceADRs issued to Algomizer, at an exercise price of ADSs and warrants. See “Item 10. Additional Information – C. Material Contracts.”$4 per ADR.

 


On December 1, 2019, Medigus and ScoutCam Ltd. consummated an A&R Transfer Agreement, effective as of March 1, 2019, which transferred and assigned certain assets and intellectual property rights related to its miniaturized imaging business, and a patent license. Under the A&R Transfer Agreement, we transferred two patent families in exchange for a license in connection with the marketing and sale of the Medigus Ultrasonic Surgical Endostapler. In addition, we granted to ScoutCam Ltd. a license to access, use, improve, develop, market and sell licensed intellectual property, including the right to any future versions, enhancements, improvements and derivative works of such licensed intellectual property in connection with the development and commercialization of the ScoutCam miniature video technology.

On December 2016, pursuant30, 2019 we consummated a securities exchange agreement with Intelllisense Solutions Inc., a Nevada corporation (Intellisense), and as a result we assigned, transferred and delivered 100% of our holdings in ScoutCam to Intellisense, in exchange for (i) common stock representing 60% of Intellisense’s issued and outstanding share capital as of the Closing, and (ii) in the event ScoutCam achieves $33,000,000 in aggregate sales within the first three (3) years immediately following the Closing, we will receive additional shares of Intellisense’s common stock representing 10% of its outstanding share capital as of the Closing. Simultaneous with the Closing, Intellisense consummated a financing transaction in the aggregate amount of $3.3 million (gross) based on a company post-money valuation of $13.3 million.

On January 13, 2020, together with our advisor Mr. Kfir Zilberman we formed a subsidiary in Delaware, in which we hold 90% of the stock capital, under the name GERD IP, Inc., or GERD IP. GERD IP was incorporated in accordance with our efforts to reorganize our assets and increase asset and organizational efficiencies. In connection thereto, the Company entered into a founders agreement as of January 12, 2020, with Kfir Zilberman. The founders agreement subjects the transfer of GERD IP membership interests held by Kfir Zilberman to a shelf prospectusright of first offer, and provides that owners of 51% of GERD IP membership interest may enforce a sale of GERD IP on the minority membership interest. The Company is obligated under the founders agreement to indemnify Kfir Zilberman for litigations expenses imposed on him or incurred by him in connection with his capacity as owner of a membership interest in GERD IP.

On February 18, 2020, we purchased 2,284,865 shares of Matomy, which represents 2.32% of its issued and outstanding share capital. On March 24, we completed an additional purchase of 22,326,246 shares of Matomy, raising our aggregate holdings in Matomy to 24.99% of Matomy’s issued and outstanding share capital.
On April 19, 2020, we entered an Asset Transfer Agreement, effective January 20, 2020, with our majority owned subsidiary GERD IP, Inc. Pursuant to the United States,Asset Transfer Agreement, we raised approximately $0.76 million (gross) through the issuancetransferred certain of ADSs and warrants. See “Item 10. Additional Information – C. Material Contracts.”our patents in consideration for seven (7) capital notes issued to us by GERD IP, Inc., of $2,000,000 each.

 

In September 2016, pursuant to a shelf prospectus in the United States, we raised approximately $1.47 (gross) million through the issuance of ADSs. See “Item 10. Additional Information – C. Material Contracts.” 

50

Summary of Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Judgments and Estimates

 

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with general accepted accounting principles require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Critical accounting policies are those that are the most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations, and that require our most difficult, subjective and complex judgments. While our significant accounting policies are described in more detail in the notes to our financial statements, our most critical accounting policies, discussed below, pertain to revenue recognition, warrants, share- based compensation, government participation in research and development expenses,inventory impairment, functional currency and accounting for income taxes.

 

Estimates, by their nature, are based upon judgments and information currently available to us. The estimates that we make are based upon historical factors, current circumstances and the experience and judgment of management. We evaluate our assumptions and estimates on an ongoing basis.

 


Impairment of non-monetary assets

Non-monetary assets are tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable.

An impairment loss is recognized for the amount by which the asset’s carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is the higher of an asset’s fair value less selling costs and value in use. For the purposes of assessing impairment, assets are grouped at the lowest levels of identifiable cash flows (cash-generating units). Non-monetary assets that were impaired are reviewed for possible reversal of the impairment recognized at each balance sheet date.

Financial instruments:

As of January 1, 2018, the Group adopted IFRS 9“Financial Instruments”.

Financial assets

Revenue RecognitionClassification

 

Our revenues in recent years was primarily derived from the sale of miniature camera and related equipment which we develop and manufacture. Such revenue was sold primarilyThe group classifies its financial assets in the United States, Asiafollowing measurement categories:

those to be measured subsequently at fair through profit or loss, and

those to be measured at amortized cost.

The classification depends on the entity’s business model for managing the financial assets and several countries in Europe. The remainder revenues relates to the salecontractual terms of the MUSE ‎™‎ system, our strategy is focused on the developmentcash flows.

For assets measured at fair value, gains and promotion of our MUSETMSystem.losses will be recorded in profit or loss.

Recognition

 

We recognizeRegular way purchases and sales of financial assets are recognized on trade date, being the date on which the group commits to purchase or sell the asset. Financial assets are derecognized when the rights to receive cash flows from the financial assets have expired or have been transferred and the group has transferred substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership.

Measurement

At initial recognition, the group measures a financial asset at its fair value plus, in the case of a financial asset not at fair value through profit or loss (FVPL), transaction costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition of the financial asset. Transaction costs of financial assets carried at FVPL are expensed in profit or loss.

Financial assets with embedded derivatives are considered in their entirety when determining whether their cash flows are solely payment of principal and interest.

Debt instruments

Subsequent measurement of debt instruments depends on the group’s business model for managing the asset and the cash flow characteristics of the asset. There are three measurement categories into which the group classifies its debt instruments:

Amortized cost: Assets that are held for collection of contractual cash flows, where those cash flows represent solely payments of principal and interest, are measured at amortized cost. Interest income from these financial assets is included in finance income using the effective interest rate method. Any gain or loss arising on derecognition is recognized directly in profit or loss and presented in other gains/(losses) together with foreign exchange gains and losses.

A gain or loss on a debt investment that is subsequently measured at FVPL is recognized in profit or loss and presented net within other gains/(losses) in the period in which it arises.


Equity instruments

The group subsequently measures equity investments at fair value except when the group has control or significant influence. Dividends from such investments continue to be recognized in profit or loss as other income when the group’s right to receive payments is established.

Changes in the fair value of financial assets at FVPL are recognized in “net change in fair value of financial assets at fair value through profit or loss” in the statement of profit or loss as applicable.

Impairment

The Group recognizes a loss allowance for expected credit losses on financial assets at amortized cost.

At each reporting date, the Group assesses whether the credit risk on a financial instrument has increased significantly since initial recognition. If the financial instrument is determined to have a low credit risk at the reporting date, the Company assumes that the credit risk on a financial instrument has not increased significantly since initial recognition.

The Group measures the loss allowance for expected credit losses on trade receivables that are within the scope of IFRS 15 and on financial instruments for which the credit risk has increased significantly since initial recognition based on lifetime expected credit losses. Otherwise, the Group measures the loss allowance at an amount equal to 12-month expected credit losses at the current reporting date. 

Prior to the effective date and adoption of IFRS 9, the financial assets of the Group were classified into the following categories: financial assets at fair value through profit or loss, and loans and receivables. The classification depended on the purpose for which the financial assets were acquired, also, prior to the adoption of IFRS 9, the Group assessed at December 31, 2017, whether there is any objective evidence that a financial asset or group of financial assets was impaired.

Financial liabilities

Financial liabilities are initially recognized at their fair value minus, in the case of a financial liability not at fair value through profit or loss, transaction costs that are directly attributable to the issue of the financial liability.

Financial liabilities are subsequently measured at amortized cost, except for derivative financial instruments, which are subsequently measured at fair value through profit or loss. 

The Group has early adopted the narrow-scope amendment to IAS 1 as described in note 2(q). Accordingly, financial liabilities are classified as non-current if the group has a substantive right to defer settlement for at least 12 months at the end of the reporting period, otherwise, they are classified as current liabilities.

The Group’s financial liabilities at amortized cost are included in accounts payable, accrued expenses, other current liabilities, payable in respect of the intangible asset and lease liabilities.

The derivative financial instruments represent warrants that confer the right to net share settlement.

The Group removes a financial liability (or a part of a financial liability) when, and only when, it is extinguished (when the obligation specified in the contract is discharged, cancelled or expired).

45

Inventory 

Inventory is measured at the lower of cost or net realizable value.

The cost is determined on the basis of “first in-first out” basis. Cost of purchased products and inventory in process includes costs of design, raw materials, direct labor, other direct costs and fixed production overheads.

Net realizable value is an estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business less applicable variable selling expenses.

Provisions for potentially obsolete or slow-moving inventory are made based on management’s analysis of inventory levels and historical obsolescence.

Materials and other supplies held for use in the production of inventories are not written down below cost if the finished products in which they will be incorporated are expected to be sold at or above cost.

The Group periodically analyzes anticipated product sales based on historical results, current backlog and marketing plans. Based on these analyses, the Group anticipates that certain products will not be sold during the next twelve months, such products were classified within the non-current assets.

Trade receivables

The balance of trade receivables includes amounts due from customers for products sold or services rendered in the ordinary course of business. If collection is expected in one year or less, they are classified as current assets. If not, they are presented as non-current assets.

Trade receivables are recognized initially at fair value and subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method, less provision for loss allowance.

Revenue Recognition

a)Revenue measurement

Commencing January 1, 2018 (the initial implementation date of IFRS 15), the Group’s revenues are measured according to the amount of consideration that the Group expects to be entitled in exchange for transferring promised goods or services to a customer, excluding amounts collected on behalf of third parties, such as sales taxes. Revenues are presented net of VAT.

Until December 31, 2017 (IAS 18 implementation) revenues were measured in accordance with International Accounting Standard No. 18,the fair value of the consideration received or IAS 18. Under IAS 18,receivable in respect of sales supplied in the ordinary course of business. Revenues were presented net of value added tax, returns, rebates and discounts.


b)Revenue recognition

Commencing January 1, 2018 (the initial implementation date of IFRS 15), the Group recognizes revenue when a customer obtains control over a promised goods or services. For each performance obligation the Group determines at contract inception whether it satisfies the performance obligation over time or satisfies the performance obligation at a point in time.

Performance obligations are satisfied over time if one of the following criteria is met:

(a) the customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits provided by the Group’s performance; (b) the Group’s performance creates or enhances an asset that the customer controls as the asset is created or enhanced; or (c) the Group’s performance does not create an asset with an alternative use to the Group and the Group has an enforceable right to payment for performance completed to date.

If a performance obligation is not satisfied over time, a Group satisfies the performance obligation at a point in time.

The transaction price is allocated to each distinct performance obligations on a relative standalone selling price (“SSP”) basis and revenue is recognized for each performance obligation when control has passed. In most cases, the Company is able to establish SSP based on the observable prices of services sold separately in comparable circumstances to similar customers and for products based on the Company’s best estimates of the price at which the Company would have sold the product regularly on a stand-alone basis. The Company reassesses the SSP on a periodic basis or when facts and circumstances change.

Product Revenue

Revenues from product sales are recognized when the customer obtains control of the Company’s product, typically upon shipment to the customer. Taxes collected from customers relating to product sales and remitted to governmental authorities are excluded from revenues.

Service Revenue

The Company also generates revenues from development services. Revenue from development services is recognized over the period of the applicable service contract. There are no long-term payment terms or significant financing components of the Company’s contracts.

The Company’s contract payment terms for product and services vary by customer. The Company assesses collectability based on several factors, including collection history.

Until December 31, 2017 revenue from the sale of goods areis recognized when all of the following criteria have beenconditions are met:

 

 The Group transferred the significant risks and rewards that are derived from theof ownership of the goods have been transferred to the purchaser;

 We doThe Group does not retain continuing managerial involvement at a level that generally typifiesto the degree usually associated with ownership and we do not retainnor effective control over the goods being sold;

 The amount of the revenuesrevenue can be measured reliably;reliably. The amount of the revenue is not considered as being reliably measured until all the conditions relating to the transaction are met. The Group bases its estimates on past experience, considering the type of customer, type of transaction and special details of each arrangement;

 It is expectedprobable that the economic benefits that are connected toassociated with the transaction will flow to us;the Group; and

 The costs that have been incurred or that willto be incurred in respect of the transaction can be measured reliably.

  

WeLeases

Group as lessee:

Through December 31, 2018 the Group applied IAS 17 to account for leases whereby a significant portion of the risks and rewards of ownership were retained by the lessor were classified as operating leases. Therefore the Group’s leases were operating leases which were charged to income statements on a straight-line basis over the lease term, including extending options which were reasonably certain.

IFRS 16 replaces upon first-time implementation the existing guidance in IAS 17. The standard sets out the principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of leases, and is expected to impact mainly the accounting treatment applied by the lessee in a lease transaction.

IFRS 16 changes the existing guidance in IAS 17 and requires lessees to recognize a lease liability that reflects future lease payments and a “right-of-use asset” in all lease contracts (except for the following), with no distinction between financing and capital leases. IFRS 16 exempts lessees in short-term leases or the when underlying asset has a low value.

IFRS 16 also recognize revenues in accordance with International Accounting Standard No. 11, or IAS 11. A “construction contract” is defined by IAS 11changes the definition of a “lease” and the manner of assessing whether a contract contains a lease.

The Group adopted IFRS 16 on January 1, 2019, using a modified retrospective transition approach, and as a contract specifically negotiatedresult did not adjust prior periods. The effect upon first-time implementation on the Group’s consolidated statement of financial position are: right-of-use lease assets of approximately $39 thousand, current lease liabilities of approximately $30 thousand and non-current lease liabilities of approximately $9 thousand.

In respect of agreements in which the Group is the lessee, the Group elected to apply the standard for the constructionfirst time by recognizing lease liabilities, for leases that were previously classified as operating leases, based on the present value of the remaining lease payments, discounted at the incremental interest rate of the lessee as at the date of first-time application. At the same time, the Group recognized a right-of-use asset at an amount equal to the amount of the lease liabilities, adjusted to reflect any prepaid or accrued lease payments in respect of those leases. As a result, the application of the standard has no an effect on the accumulated deficit balance.

The Group applied the following practical expedients:

Non-lease components: practical expedient by class of underlying asset not to separate non-lease components (services) from lease components and, instead, account for each lease component and any associated non lease components as a single lease component.

The practical expedient for short-term leases is applied. Accordingly, for leases in which the Group is the lessee, the Group does not to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability in respect of leases whose lease period ends within 12 months of the date of initial application.


As part of the first-time application of the standard, the Group has elected to apply the following practical expedients:

Excluding initial direct costs for the measurement of the right-of-use asset at the date of initial application;

Using hindsight in determining the lease term where the contract contains options to extend or terminate the lease;

For leases in which the Group is the lessee, the Group does not to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability in respect of leases whose lease period ends within 12 months of the date of initial application;

Not to reassess whether a contract is, or contains a lease at the date of initial application. Instead, for contracts entered into before the transition date the Group relied on its assessment made applying IAS 17.

Discount rate: The lease payments are discounted using the lessee’s incremental borrowing rate, since the interest rate implicit in the lease cannot be readily determined. The lessee’s incremental borrowing rate is the rate that the individual lessee would have to pay to borrow the funds necessary to obtain an asset of similar value to the right-of-use asset in a similar economic environment with similar terms, security and conditions. However, the Group is using the practical expedient of accounting together a portfolio of leases with similar characteristics provided that it is reasonably expected that the effects on the financial statements of applying this standard to the portfolio would not differ materially from applying this Standard to the individual leases within that portfolio. And using a single discount rate to a portfolio of leases with reasonably similar characteristics (such as leases with a similar remaining lease term for a similar class of underlying asset in a similar economic environment). The weighted average of lessee’s incremental annual borrowing rate applied to the lease liabilities was 10%.

Lease liabilities measurement:

Lease liabilities were initially measured on a present value basis of the following lease payments:

fixed payments (including in-substance fixed payments), less any lease incentives receivable;

variable lease payment that are based on an index or a rate (such as CPI);

lease payments (principal and interest) to be made under reasonably certain extension options.

The lease liability is subsequently measured according to the effective interest method, with interest costs recognized in the statement of income as incurred. The amount of lease liabilities is increased to reflect the accretion of interest and reduced for the lease payments made. In addition, the carrying amount of lease liabilities is remeasured if there is a modification, a change in the lease term, a change in the lease payments (e.g., changes to future payments resulting from a change in an index or rate used to determine such lease payments) or a change in the assessment of an option to purchase the underlying asset.

The Group is exposed to potential future changes in lease payments based on linkage to the CPI index, which are not included in the lease liability until they take effect. When adjustments to lease payments based on an index or rate take effect, the outcomelease liability is reassessed and adjusted against the right-of-use asset.

Principal elements of the lease payments are presented in the statement of cash flows under the cash used in financing activities. Finance cost of the lease payments are presented in the statement of cash flows under the operating activities.

Right-of-use assets measurement:

Right-of-use assets were measured at cost comprising the following:

the amount of the initial measurement of lease liability;

any lease payments made at or before the commencement date and;

any initial direct costs (except for initial application).

After the commencement date, the Group measures the right-of-use asset applying the cost model, less any accumulated depreciation and any accumulated impairment losses and adjusted for any remeasurement of the lease liability.

Assets are depreciated by the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the right of use assets or the lease period, which is shorter:

Years
Property1-2
Motor vehicles3

50

Significant Judgments and Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements under IFRS requires the Group to make estimates and judgements that affect the application of policies and reported amounts. Estimates and judgements are continually evaluated and are based on historical experience and other factors including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

Included in this note are accounting judgments and/or estimates which cover areas that the Directors and Management consider to have a construction contract can be estimated reliablysignificant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amount of assets and liabilities in the future:

Deferred tax assets

Based on management’s judgment, no deferred tax assets have been recorded in the Group’s books of accounts for current losses carried forward for tax purposes since it is not probable that the contractGroup will be profitable, the revenue and the associated costs recognized over the contract period by referenceable to the stage of completion. We recognize expected loss immediately once concluded that it’s probable. When the outcome of a construction contract cannot be estimated reliably, then we recognize revenue only to the extent of contract costs incurred that it is probable will be recoverable. Variations in contract work, claims and incentive payments are included in contract revenue to the extent that may have been agreed with the customer and are capable of being reliably measured. We use the “percentage-of-completion method” to determine the appropriate amount to recognize in a given period. The stage of completion is measured by reference to the contract costs incurred up to the end of the reporting period as a percentage of total estimated costs for each contract. Costs incurredutilize those losses in the periodforeseeable future against taxable income as of December 31, 2019. The deferred tax asset in connection with the future activitiesaccumulated losses for tax purposes (which was not recorded due to the reason mentioned above) aggregated to approximately USD 17 million.

Fair value measurement of share-based payment transactions

The Company granted several equity-settled share based compensation plans to the Group’s employees and other service providers in connection with their service to the Group. The fair value of the share options is measured at grant date on the basis of accepted valuation models and assumptions regarding unobservable inputs used in the valuation models. The fair value mentioned above is expensed to the statement of loss and other comprehensive loss during the vesting period and concurrently recorded as capital reserves from options granted within the consolidated statement of changes in equity.

Inventory impairment

The Company continually evaluates inventory for potential loss due to excess quantity or obsolete or slow-moving inventory by comparing sales history and sales projection to the inventory on hand. When evidence indicates that the carrying value of a contractproduct may not be recoverable, a charge is recorded to reduce the inventory to its current net realizable value. During 2018, the Company recorded in its books an inventory impairment of $328 thousands, charged to cost of revenues.

Fair value measurement of financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit or loss

As described in Note 4 to our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company signed an agreement with Algomizer Ltd. As part of the agreement a Company received several financial assets. The fair value of this financial assets classified at FVTPL, which are excluded from contract costsnot traded on an active market, is determined by using a level 3 valuation technique, see note 5 to our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019.

In addition, the Company issued warrants to investors. The fair value of this warrants classified at financial liabilities through profit or loss, which are not traded on an active market, is determined by using a level 3 valuation technique, see note 5 to our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019.

The fair value of this financial assets and liabilities is measured on the basis of accepted valuation models and assumptions regarding unobservable inputs used in determining the stagevaluation models. The fair value mentioned above is expensed to the statement of completion. We classifiedloss and other comprehensive loss.


Considering the likelihood of contingent losses and quantifying possible settlements

Provisions are recorded when a loss is considered probable and can be reasonably estimated. Judgment is necessary in assessing the net contract position for each contract as either an assetlikelihood that a pending claim or litigation against the Group will succeed, or a liability will arise, quantifying the possible range of final settlement. These judgments are made by management with the support of internal specialists or with the support of outsource consultants such as legal counsel. Because of the inherent uncertainties in this evaluation process, actual results may be different from these estimates.

Listing expenses

The reverse recapitalization transaction conducted at ScoutCam Ltd.’s level. was accounted for in the consolidated financial statements of the Company as a transaction with non-controlling interest in which the Company consolidated Intellisense’s net assets in consideration equal to the fair value of the shares Intellisense had to issue to Medigus as part of the balance sheet. Net contract classifiedreverse recapitalization transaction. The fair value could not be determined based on Intellisense’s stock market value since the trading volume of Intellisense’s common stock was nil. Therefore, the Company determined the fair value of the transaction based on the pre-money valuation of Intellisense which was taken into account as an asset whenpart of the incurred costs plus recognized profits (less recognized losses) exceed progress billings andIssuance of Units to External Investors as a liability if otherwise.mentioned above.

 

51

Warrants

 

Receipts from investors in respect of warrants are classified as equity to the extent that they confer the right to purchase a fixed number of shares for a fixed exercise price. In the event that the exercise price is not deemed to be fixed, the warrants are classified as non-currentcurrent liability. This liability initially recognized at its fair value on the issue date and subsequently accounted for at fair value at each reporting date. The fair value changes are charged to profit from changes in fair value of warrants issued to investors on the statement of comprehensive loss. The fair value of the warrants is measured at issue date and each reporting date on the basis of accepted valuation models and assumptions regarding unobservable inputs used in the valuation models.

 

In August 2014,We adopted the amendment to IAS 1. Accordingly, we classified in connection withthe statement of financial position warrants as part of current liabilities based on the rights that exist at the end of the reporting period including the right to convert into equity. The amendment was applied retrospectively and as a private placement,result we issued investorsreclassified warrants presented in comparative periods to purchase 43,695 of our ADSs at an exercise price of NIS 6.27. The warrants were exercisable for a period of three years from the date of issuance. The warrants expired in August 2017 without being exercised.current liabilities.

 

In December 2016, in connection with a registered direct offering, we issued warrants to purchase 39,8719,970 of our ADSs at an exercise price of $9.0.$36 per ADS. The warrants are exercisable for a period of five and half years from the date of issuance.

 

In March 2017, in connection with our public offering, we issued warrants to purchase 2,142,858535,730 of our ADSs at an exercise price of $3.5.$14 per ADS. The warrants are exercisable for a period of five years from the date of issuance.

 

In November 2017, in connection with a registered direct offering, we issued warrants to purchase 405,000101,251 of our ADSs at an exercise price of $2.25.$9 per ADS. The warrants are exercisable for a period of five and half years from the date of issuance.

 

In July 2018, in connection with an underwritten offering, we issued warrants to purchase 3,263,325 of our ADSs at an exercise price of $3.5 per ADS. The warrants were listed on Nasdaq under the symbol MDGSW. The warrants are exercisable for a period of five years from their issuance.


The fair value of the warrants was calculated according to valuation methods, and based on the following assumptions:

 

 December 31  December 31 
 2017  2016  2019  2018 
 Standard deviation  Risk-free interest  Fair value (USD thousands)

Standard deviation

  Risk-free interest  Fair value (USD thousands)  Standard
deviation
(%)
  Risk-free
interest
(%)
  Fair value
(USD
thousands)
  

Standard
deviation
(%)

 

Risk-free
interest
(%)

  Fair value
(USD
thousands)
 
Warrants issued November 2017  63.47%  0.97%  228               85.23%  0.32%  40   82.62%  1.46%  94 
Warrants issued March 2017  66.72%  0.56%  325               84.49%  0.19%  -   91.11%  1.02%  - 
Warrants issued December 2016  65.74%  0.70%  6   155.39%  1.26%  237   82.19%  0.23%  -   89.64%  1.18%  3 
Warrants issued August 2014              155.39%  0.00%  - 

 

Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss

On June 19, 2019 the Company signed an agreement with Algomizer Ltd. (“Algomizer”) and its wholly-owned subsidiary Linkury Ltd. (together the “Algomizer Group”), for an investment of approximately $5 million in Algomizer Group (the “Investment Agreement”). The investment was subject to certain pre-conditions, which were met on September 3, 2019 (“Closing Date”). As part of the Investment Agreement:

a.Medigus received 2,168,675 ordinary shares of Algomizer (“Algomizer Shares”).

b.Medigus received 729,508 ordinary shares of Linkury Ltd (“Linkury Shares”).

c.Medigus received 2,898,183 warrants to purchase 2,898,183 Algomizer shares at an exercise price of NIS 5.25 per share (“Algomizer Warrants”).

d.Medigus’ investment in Algomizer and Linkury is based on a projection that Linkury’s net profit for 2019 will be at least NIS 15 million. In the event that Linkury’s net income is less than NIS 15 million for 2019, Medigus will be issued with additional securities in Algomizer group, adjusting the price per Algomizer group securities to the actual net profit for 2019, and compensating Medigus for the difference between the actual net profit and the target net profit for 2019 (“Reverse Earn Out”). Linkury net profit for 2019 was more than NIS 15 million.

e.Medigus is also entitled, for a period of three years following the closing of the investment, to convert any and all of its Linkury shares into Algomizer shares with a 20% discount over the average share price of Algomizer on TASE within the 60 trading days preceding the conversion (“Conversion Right”).

f.In the event, during the three year period following the closing of the investment, Algomizer shall issue, or under take to issue ordinary shares with a price per share or exercise per share lower NIS 4.15 (the “Reduced Per Share Purchase Price”), Algomizer shall be allocated immediately with such amounts of additional Ordinary Shares (and the Algomizer Warrant shall be adjusted accordingly) equal to the difference of (x) the amount of ordinary shares actually received by the Company under the Investment Agreement, and (y) the amount which Medigus would have otherwise received should the Reduced Per Share Purchase Price was applied (“Anti-Dilution”).

In consideration for the assets as described above Medigus:

a. Paid NIS 14,400,000 at cash (approximately USD 4,057 thousands).

b. Issued to Algomizer 333,334 ADS representing 6,666,680 ordinary shares.

c. Issued to Algomizer 333,334 warrants at an exercise price of USD 4 per ADS.


The difference between the fair value of consideration paid by the Company and the fair value of Linkury Shares, Algomizer Warrants, Reverse Earn Out, Conversion Right and Anti-Dilution was attributed to Algomizer shares which accounted for using the equity method.

The following table presents the level 3 fair value financial assets as of December 31, 2019:

December 31,
2019
Level 3
USD in
thousands
Linkury’s shares2,637
Algomizer Warrants71
Reverse earn-out0
Conversion Right619
Anti-dilution289
3,616

Valuation processes of the financial assets (for details, see Note 4 to our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019):

Linkury shares - the Company used the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model for a period of 7 years, using the following principal assumptions: weighted average cost of capital (WACC) – 20.9%. The asset amount is adjusted at each balance sheet date based on the then relevant assumptions. A shift of the WACC by +/- 5% results in a change in fair value of Linkury shares of $55 thousands.

Algomizer warrants - the Company used the Black-Scholes model, using the following principal assumptions: expected volatility of 34.74%, risk-free interest of 0.24%, expected term of 3 years following the grant date. The asset amount is adjusted at each balance sheet date based on the then relevant assumptions, until the earlier of full exercise or expiration. For details, see Note 4.

Anti-dilution - the Company used the Black-Scholes model, using the following principal assumptions: 25% probability for the occurrence of an anti-dilution event, expected volatility of 34.74%, risk-free interest of 0.24%, expected term of 3 years following the issuance date. An increase of the probability for the occurrence of anti-dilution event by 10% would have increased the fair value of Anti-dilution by $116 thousands. For details, see Note 4.

Reverse earn out - the Company used the Monte Carlo model for a period of 0.32 years following the grant date, using the following principal assumptions: expected volatility 22.9%, risk-free interest 0.12%. For details, see Note 4.

Conversion right - the Company used the Monte Carlo method for a period of 3 years following the grant date, using the following principal assumptions: expected volatility 34.74%, risk-free interest 0.24%. For details, see Note 4.

54

Share-Based Compensation

 

We granted several equity-settled share basedshare-based compensation plans to the Company’s employees, directors and other service providers in connection with their service to the Company. The fair value of such services is calculated at the grant date and amortized to the statement of loss and other comprehensive loss during the vesting period.

 

52

The fair value of the options which was granted on December 2015 (Series F) and October 2017, (Series K)January 2019 and July 2019 was calculated using the Black and Scholes options pricing model, and based on the following assumptions:

 

Plan Fair value on grant date-NIS in thousands  Share price on date of grant (NIS)  Expected dividend Expected volatility  Risk free interest  Vesting conditions Expected
term
Series F  607   1.627  None  54%  1.39%Four equal portions, following each anniversary of the grant date 6 years
Series K  1,109   0.162  None  64%  1.16%Four equal portions, following each anniversary of the grant date 6 years
Date of grant Fair value
on grant
date
(NIS in
thousands)
  Share
price on
date of
grant
(NIS)
  Expected
dividend
 Expected
volatility
  Risk free
interest
  Vesting conditions Expected
term
October 2017  1,109   1.62  None  64%  1.16% Four equal portions, following each anniversary of the grant date 6 years
January 2019  947   0.506  None  74%  1.45% will vest in 12 equal quarterly installments over a three-year period commencing October 1, 2018 6 years
July 2019  325   0.436  None  75%  1.12% 25% will vest on the first anniversary of the grant date and 75% will vest on a quarterly basis over a period of three years thereafter 6 years

 

Inventory impairment

The company continually evaluates inventory for potential loss due to excess quantity or obsolete or slow-moving inventory by comparing sales history and sales projection to the inventory on hand. When evidence indicates that the carrying value of a product may not be recoverable, a charge is recorded to reduce the inventory to its current net realizable value.

Functional Currency

 

Until December 31, 2015, our consolidated financial statements were presented in NIS, which was the Company’s functional and presentation currency as of such date. Effective January 1, 2016, the Company changed its functional currency to the U.S. dollar. The 2015 2014 and 2013,2014 financial data presented in this annual report were translated from NIS to USD as follows: (1) assets and liabilities were translated using the December 31 exchange rates of each year, as applicable; (2) equity items were translated using historical exchange rates at the relevant transaction dates; (3) the consolidated statements of loss and other comprehensive loss line items were translated using the average exchange rates for each year; and (4) the translation net effect was recorded as “currency translation differences” within the consolidated statements of loss and other comprehensive loss for each year.

 

Accounting for Income Taxes

 

As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements we are required to estimate our income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. This process requires us to estimate our actual current tax exposures and make an assessment of temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included within our consolidated balance sheet. Significant management judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes, deferred tax assets and liabilities. Changes to these estimates may result in a significant increase or decrease to our tax provision in the current or subsequent period.

 

We recognize deferred tax assets for unused tax losses, tax benefits, and deductible temporary differences to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profits will be available against which that can be utilized. Deferred tax assets are reviewed at each reporting date and are reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that the related tax benefit will be realized.

 


The calculation of our tax liabilities or reduction in deferred tax asset involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex tax regulations and estimates of future taxable income in different geographical jurisdictions. We recognize liabilities for uncertain tax positions if it is probable to be realized. It is inherently difficult and subjective to estimate such amounts, as we have to determine the probability of various possible outcomes. We reevaluate these uncertain tax positions on a quarterly basis. This evaluation is based on factors including, but not limited to, changes in facts or circumstances, changes in tax law, effective settlement of audit issues, and new audit activity. Such a change in recognition or measurement would result in the recognition of a tax benefit or an additional charge to the tax provision.

 

53

No deferred tax assets have been recorded in the Group’s books and records with respect to accumulated losses since it is not probable that the Group will be able to utilize such losses in the foreseeable future against taxable income.

 

A.Results of Operations

 

Overview

ScoutCam Ltd. was formed in Israel on January 3, 2019, as a wholly owned subsidiary of Medigus, and commenced operations on March 1, 2019. ScoutCam was incorporated as part of the reorganization of Medigus, which was designed to distinguish ScoutCam’s miniaturized imaging business, or the micro ScoutCam portfolio, from Medigus’s other operations and to enable Medigus to form a separate business unit with dedicated resources focused on the promotion of such technology. In December 2019, Medigus and ScoutCam consummated an Amended and Restated Asset Transfer Agreement, effective March 1, 2019, which transferred and assigned certain assets and intellectual property rights related to its miniaturized imaging business.

On March 1, 2019, 12 employees moved from Medigus to ScoutCam. The vast majority of these employees were from the Production and R&D departments. Therefore, their transfer caused large changes in the data of these two line items.


The following table sets forth a summary of our operating results:

 

 Year ended December 31,  Year ended December 31, 
 2017 2016 2015  2019  2018  2017 
 U.S. Dollars, in thousands, except per share and weighted average shares data  U.S. Dollars, in thousands,
except per share and
weighted average shares data
 
Revenues 467 549 624 
Revenues:       
Products  188   219   467 
Services  85   217   - 
Other  -   -   - 
  273   436   467 
            
Cost of revenues:                   
Products and services 219 176 277 
Products  370   164   219 
Services  85   115   - 
Inventory impairment  297         -   328   297 
  455   607   516 
            
Gross Profit (Loss) (49) 373 347   (182)  (171)  (49)
Research and development expenses, net 2,208 3,655 4,384 
            
Research and development expenses  609   1,809   2,208 
Sales and marketing expenses 846 2,125 2,680   326   1,354   846 
General and administrative expenses 3,005 3,684 2,842   3,081   3,338   3,005 
Other income, net        3 
Net change in fair value of financial assets at fair value through profit or loss  92   -   - 
Share of net loss of associates accounted for using the equity method  (216)  -   - 
Listing expenses  (10,098)  -   - 
Operating loss (6,108) (9,091) (9,556)  (14,420)  (6,672)  (6,108)
Profit from changes in fair value of warrants issued to investors 3,502 25 106 
Finance income (expenses), net  54  87  (14)
Changes in fair value of warrants issued to investors  142   148   3,502 
Financial income (expenses) in respect of deposits, bank commissions and exchange differences, net  99   (54)  54 
Loss before taxes on income (2,552) (8,979) (9,464)  (14,179)  (6,578)  (2,552)
Taxes benefit (Taxes on income)  7  (28)  (68)  1   (20)  7 
Loss for the year (2,545) (9,007) (9,532)  (14,178)  (6,598)  (2,545)
Other comprehensive loss for the year        (211)
Other comprehensive loss for the year, net of tax  (41)  -   - 
Total comprehensive loss for the year (2,545) (9,007) (9,743)  (14,219)  (6,598)  (2,545)
                   
Loss for the year is attributable to:            
Owners of Medigus  (14,178)  (6,598)  (2,545)
Non-controlling interest  -   -   - 
  USD   (14,178)  (6,598)  (2,545)
Basic and diluted loss per share  (0.02)  (0.26)  (0.34)
            
Total comprehensive income for the period is attributable to:            
Owners of Medigus  (14,219)  (6,598)  (2,545)
Non-controlling interest  -   -   - 
  (14,219)  (6,598)  (2,545)
            
Basic loss per ordinary share(1)  (0.18)  (0.16)  (0.20)
Diluted loss per ordinary share(1)  (0.18)  (0.16)  (0.23)
            
Weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding used to compute (in thousands)(1):            
Basic loss per share  78,124   41,988   12,569 
Diluted loss per share  78,124   41,988   12,969 

 


Year ended December 31, 20172019 compared to year ended December 31, 20162018

 

Revenues

 

Revenues for the year ended December 31, 20172019 were $467,000,$273,000 a decrease of $82,000,$163,000, or 15%37%, compared to total revenues of $549,000$436,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016.2018.

 

The tables below set forth our revenues, by region and by product for the periods presented:

 

 Year Ended December 31,  Year Ended December 31, 
U.S. dollars; in thousands 2017  2016  2019  2018 
United States  115   25%  345   63%  138   51%  315   72%
Europe  193   41%  53   10%  69   25%  63   14%
Asia  116   25%  5   1%  22   8%  36   8%
Other  43   9%  146   26%  44   16%  22   6%
Total  467   100%  549   100%  273   100%  436   100%

U.S. dollars; in thousands 2019  2018 
MUSEsystem and related equipment  -   -%  44   10%
Development services  85   31%  217   50 
Miniature camera and related equipment  188   69%  175   40%
Total  273   100%  436   100%

 

54

U.S. dollars; in thousands 2017  2016 
MUSETMsystem and related equipment  161   34%  100   18%
Miniature camera and related equipment  306   66%  449   82%
Total  467   100%  549   100%

Our revenues in recent years were primarily derived from the sale of miniature camera and related equipment which we develop and manufacture such revenue was sold primarily in the United States, Asia and several countries in Europe.from development services. The remainder revenues relatesrelate to the sale of the MUSE ‎™‎ system, our strategy is focused on the development and promotion of our MUSETMSystem.system.

 

The decrease in revenues in 20172019 was primarily due to a decrease of $143,000$44,000 in miniature camera and related equipmentrevenues from MUSEsystems, decrease of $132,000 in development services revenues, which was partially offset by an increase of $61,000 in revenues$13,000 from MUSETMsystems.

During 2016 we recognized two large projects aggregated to $239,000 and $118,000 for National Aeronautics and Space Administration and to one of Israel’s leading industrial companies, respectively, both relate to the miniature camera and related equipment revenues

The decrease in revenues from MUSE™ systems was due to our strategy to abandon the commercialization of the MUSE™ system.

The increase in revenues from miniature camera and both were disclosed as major customers within Note 17d in the Company’s consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report. Those projects were not repeated during 2017, the loss of such revenuesrelated equipment was partially offset byprimarily due to an overall increase in the sales of the Company’s products.products to occasional customers.

 

The decrease in revenues from services was primarily due to:

(i)during the year ended December 31, 2018, we recorded revenues for development services provided to a customer in the amount of approximately $130,000 (see ‘Customer A’ in note 18d to our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019). During year ended December 31, 2019 we recorded revenues for development services provided to this customer in the amount of approximately $85,000; and

(ii)during the year ended December 31, 2018, we recorded revenues for development services provided to a customer in the amount of approximately $87,000 (see ‘Customer B’ in note 18d to our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019). We did not receive any revenue from development services from this customer during the year ended December 31, 2019.

Cost of revenues and inventory impairment

 

Cost of revenues and inventory impairment for the year ended December 31, 20172019 were $516,000, an increase$455,000, a decrease of $340,000,$152,000, or 193%25%, compared to cost of revenues and inventory impairment of $176,000$607,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016.2018. The increasedecrease was primarily due to the decrease in inventory impairment of $297,000 that was recorded during 2017$328,000 partially offset by the increase in cost of revenues of $176,000. During the year ended December 31, 2018 we recognized inventory impairment due to an inventory analysis management performed. Such analysis matched between the inventory items held byCompany’s decision to terminate distribution agreements and due to our strategy to abandon the Company each balance sheet cut-off date compared to management forecast. The excess inventory representedcommercialization of the inventory impairment that was recorded.MUSE™ system.

 

The increase in cost of revenues was due to:

a)changes in products and services mix; and

b)increase in payroll expenses and allocation of other expenses, as result of the Reorganization (as described under “Overview”) and allocating employees salaries from research and development line item to the cost of revenues line item due to the nature of their current work.


Gross Profit (Loss)Loss

 

Gross loss for the year ended December 31, 20172019 was $49,000, a decrease$182,000, an increase of $422,000$11,000 compared to gross profitloss of $373,000$171,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016.2018. The decreaseincrease was primarily due to the decrease in revenues partially offset by the decrease in cost of revenues and inventory impairment, of $297,000as mentioned above. The remainder decrease relates to the fact that the 2016 projects mentioned above, that were not repeated during 2017, were more profitable than the Company’s products.

 

Research and Development Expenses

 

Research and development expenses for the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, were $2.2 million,$609,000, a decrease of $1.5 million,$1,200,000, or 40%66%, compared to $3.7 million$1,809,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016.2018. The decrease was primarily due to the Company’s cost reduction programdecision of the company to cease the MUSE™ operation which was implemented sinceresulted mainly by decrease on salary expenses, acquisition of materials and services rendered to the third quarter of 2016.company for research and development activities.

 

Sales and Marketing Expenses

 

Sales and marketing expenses for the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, were $0.8 million,$326,000, a decrease of $1.3 million,$1,028,000, or 60%76%, compared to $2.1 million$1,354,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016.2018. The decrease was primarily due to the Company’s cost reduction program, which was implemented sincedecision to abandon the third quarter of 2016,strategy to commercialize the MUSE™ system which resulted in a termination of headcount (mainly in the Company’s subsidiary in the U.S.)decrease on payroll expenses and also due to a reduction of our marketing activities such as participation in exhibits.activities.

 

55

General and Administrative Expenses

 

AdministrativeGeneral and GeneralAdministrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, were $3.0 million,$3,081,000, a decrease of $0.7 million,$257,000, or 18%8%, compared to $3.7 million$3,338,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016.2018. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in professional services of $1.3 million in connection with an intellectual property litigation that took place during 2016 and a decrease of $0.2 million primarily due to the cost reduction program, which was implemented since the third quarter of 2016, partially offset by an increase in professional services of $0.9 million in connection with issuance expenses which were attributed to the warrants classified as liabilities during 2017 and therefore allocated directly to the consolidated statement of loss and other comprehensive loss (for additional information regardingon the year ended December 31, 2018, partially offset by increase in professional services due to:

a.Stock-based compensation in connection with options granted to the new directors and new CEO.

b.Appointment of CEO.

c.Hiring new financial consultants.

d.Increase on PR activities.

Net change in fair value of financial assets at fair value through profit or loss

On June 19, 2019 the Company signed an agreement with Algomizer Ltd. (“Algomizer”) and its wholly-owned subsidiary Linkury Ltd. (together the “Algomizer Group”), for an investment of approximately $5 million in Algomizer Group (the “Investment Agreement”). The investment was subject to certain closing conditions, which were met on September 3, 2019 (“Closing Date”). As part of the Investment Agreement:

a.Medigus received 2,168,675 ordinary shares of Algomizer (“Algomizer Shares”).

b.Medigus received 729,508 ordinary shares of Linkury Ltd (“Linkury Shares”).

c.Medigus received 2,898,183 warrants to purchase 2,898,183 Algomizer shares at an exercise price of NIS 5.25 per share (“Algomizer Warrants”).


d.Medigus’ investment in Algomizer and Linkury is based on a projection that Linkury’s net profit for 2019 will be at least NIS 15 million. In the event that Linkury’s net income is less than NIS 15 million for 2019, Medigus will be issued with additional securities in Algomizer group, adjusting the price per Algomizer group securities to the actual net profit for 2019, and compensating Medigus for the difference between the actual net profit and the target net profit for 2019 (“Reverse Earn Out”). Linkury net profit for 2019 was more than NIS 15 million.

e.Medigus is also entitled, for a period of three years following the closing of the investment, to convert any and all of its Linkury shares into Algomizer shares with a 20% discount over the average share price of Algomizer on TASE within the 60 trading days preceding the conversion (“Conversion Right”).

f.In the event, during the three year period following the closing of the investment, Algomizer shall issue, or undertake to issue ordinary shares with a price per share or exercise per share lower than NIS 4.15 (the “Reduced Per Share Purchase Price”), Algomizer shall be allocated immediately with such amounts of additional Ordinary Shares (and the Algomizer Warrant shall be adjusted accordingly) equal to the difference of (x) the amount of ordinary shares actually received by the Company under the Investment Agreement, and (y) the amount which Medigus would have otherwise received should the Reduced Per Share Purchase Price was applied (“Anti-Dilution”).

Linkury Shares, Algomizer Warrants, Reverse Earn Out, Conversion Right and Anti-Dilution are classified as financial assets through profit and loss and measured at fair value through profit or loss at each balance sheet date based on the then relevant assumptions, until the earlier of full exercise or expiration. On year ended December 31,2019 we recognized income of $92,000 from net change in fair value of this financial assets.

Share of net loss of accounted for using the equity method

As described above we invest at Algomizer and received 2,168,675 ordinary shares of Algomizer. This investment accounted for using the equity method. Share of net loss of accounted for using the equity method we recognized at year ended December 31, 2019 was $216,000.

Listing expenses please refer to Note 13b

The reverse recapitalization transaction conducted at ScoutCam Ltd.’s level was accounted for in the Company’s consolidated financials included elsewherefinancial statement of the Company as a transaction with non-controlling interest in this Annual Report).which the Company consolidated Intellisense’s net assets in consideration equal to the fair value of the shares Intellisense had to issue to Medigus as part of the reverse recapitalization transaction. The fair value could not be determined based on Intellisense’s stock market value since the trading volume of Intellisense’s common stock was nil. Therefore, the Company determined the fair value of the transaction based on the pre-money valuation of Intellisense which was taken into account as part of the Issuance of Units to External Investors. Accordingly, an amount of $10,098,000 was listed in the consolidated statement of loss and comprehensive loss as listing expenses.

 

Operating loss

 

We incurred an operating loss of $6.1 million$14,420,000 for the year ended December 31, 2017, a decrease2019, an increase of $3.0 million,$7,748,000, or 33%116%, compared to operating loss of $9.1 million$6,672,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016.2018. The decreaseincrease in operating resultsloss was due to $1.5 millionlisting expenses at an amount of $10,098,000 and share of net loss accounted for using the equity method at an amount of $216,000, partially offset by $1,200,000 decrease in research and development expenses, $1.3 million$1,028,000 decrease in sales and marketing expenses, and $0.7 million$257,000 decrease in administrative and general expenses $0.1 million decreaseand $92,000 profit from net change in revenues and $0.3 million increase in costfair value of revenues.financial assets at fair value through profit or loss.

 


Profit from Change in Fair Value of Warrants Issued to Investors

 

Profit from change in the fair value of warrants issued to investors for the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, was $3.5 million, an increase$142,000, a decrease of almost $3.5 million,$6,000, compared to $25,000profit of $148,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016.2018.

 

Warrants issued to investors classified as either liabilities or as part of the shareholders’ equity based on the accounting guidance established in connection with the rights attached to the warrants. The warrants that were classified as liabilities due to a cashless exercise mechanism are subject to adjustment to fair value each balance sheet cut-off date based on the Black and Scholes model.date. This adjustment is presented separately within the consolidated statement of loss and other comprehensive loss. The significant profit recorded during the year ended December 31, 2017 derived from a decrease

Financial income (expenses) in the fair valuerespect of the warrants classified as liabilities relating primarily to warrants that were issued during the first quarter of 2017,deposits, bank commissions and was primarily due to a reduction in price of the Company’s ordinary shares and the fact that remaining exercise period was shortened. The profit during the year ended December 31, 2016 was relatively immaterial.

Finance income,exchange differences, net

 

Finance income, net for the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, was $54,000, a decrease$99,000 an increase of $33,000, or 38%,$153,000, compared to $87,000finance expenses of $54,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016. The decrease was primarily due to changes in currencies exchange rates.2018.

 

Loss before taxes on incomefor the year

 

We incurred loss before taxes on income of $2.6 million$14,178,000 for the year ended December 31, 2017, a decrease2019, an increase of $6.4 million,$7,580,000, or 72%115%, compared to loss before taxes on income of $9.0 million$6,598,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016.2018. The decreaseincrease was primarily due to $3.0 million decrease$7,748,000 increase in operating loss and $3.5 millionpartially offset by $147,000 increase in profit from change in the fair value of warrants issued to investors.finance income, net.

 

Taxes benefit (Taxes on income)

Taxes benefit for the year ended December 31, 2017, were $7,000, a decrease of $35,000, compared to $28,000 taxes on income for the year ended December 31, 2016. The decrease was due to tax adjustment entry recorded during 2017 due to prior year final tax assessment for the Company’s U.S. subsidiary.

Loss for the year

Loss for the year was $2.5 million, or a loss of $0.02 per basic and diluted share, for the year ended December 31, 2017, a decrease of $6.5 million, compared to loss for the year of $9.0 million, or loss of $0.26 per basic and diluted share, for the year ended December 31, 2016. The decrease was primarily due to $6.4 million decrease in loss before taxes on income.

56

Year ended December 31, 20162018 compared to year ended December 31, 20152017

 

Revenues

Revenues forThe discussion and analysis regarding the yearresults of operations from the fiscal years ended December 31, 2016 were $549,000, a decrease of $75,000, or 12%, compared to total revenues of $624,000 for the year ended December 31, 2015. 

The tables below set forth our revenues, by region2018 and by product for the periods presented:

 Year Ended December 31, 
U.S. dollars; in thousands 2016  2015 
United States  345   63%  446   72%
Europe  53   10%  105   17%
Asia  5   1%  51   8%
Other  146   26%  22   3%
Total  549   100%  624   100%

U.S. dollars; in thousands 2016  2015 
MUSETMsystem and related equipment  100   18%  66   11%
Miniature camera and related equipment  449   82%  558   89%
Total  549   10%  624   100%

Our revenues in recent years were primarily derived from the sale of miniature camera and related equipment which we develop and manufacture, such revenue was sold primarily in the United States, Asia and several countries in Europe. The remainder revenues relates to the sale of the MUSE ‎™‎ system Our strategy is focused on the development and promotion of our MUSETMSystem.

The decrease in revenues was primarily due to a decrease in sales of our miniature camera and related equipment of $109,000, partially offset by an increase of sales of our MUSETM system of $34,000.

Cost of revenues

Cost of revenues for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $176,000, a decrease of $101,000, or 36%, compared to cost of revenues of $277,000 for the year ended December 31, 2015. The decrease is consistent with the decrease in the revenues.

Gross Profit

Gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $373,000, an increase of $26,000, or 7% compared to gross profit of $347,000 for the year ended December 31, 2015. Gross profit as a percentage of total revenues increased to 68% for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to 56% for the year ended December 31, 2015, primarily due to the development services provided to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and to one of Israel’s leading industrial companies during 2016 which were more profitable projects.

Research and Development Expenses

Research and development expenses for the year ended December 31, 2016, were $3.7 million, a decrease of $0.7 million, or 17%, compared to $4.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The decrease was primarily due to the decrease in the acquisition of materials by the Company and services rendered to the Company for trainings activities during 2016, due to a cost reduction program which was implemented by the Company since the third quarter of 2016.

57

Sales and Marketing Expenses

Sales and marketing expenses for the year ended December 31, 2016, were $2.1 million, a decrease of $0.6 million, or 21%, compared to $2.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The decrease was primarily due to the Company’s cost reduction program which was implemented since the third quarter of 2016, which resulted in a termination of headcount (mainly in the Company’s subsidiary in the U.S.) and also due to a reduction of our marketing activities such as participation in exhibits.

General and Administrative Expenses

Administrative and General expenses for the year ended December 31, 2016, were $3.7 million, an increase of $0.9 million, or 30%, compared to $2.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase was primarily due to an increase in professional services in connection with an intellectual property litigation.

Operating loss

We incurred an operating loss of $9.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, a decrease of $0.5 million, or 5%, compared to operating loss of $9.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The decrease in operating results was primarily due to $0.7 million decrease research and development expenses and $0.6 million decrease in sales and marketing expenses, partially offset by $0.9 million increase in administrative and general expenses.

Profit from Change in Fair Value of Warrants Issued to Investors

Profit from change in the fair value of warrants issued to investors for the year ended December 31, 2016, was $25,000, a decrease of $81,000, or 76% compared to $106,000 for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Warrants issued to investors are classified as either liabilities or as part of the shareholders’ equity based on the accounting guidance established in connection with the rights attached to the warrants. The warrants that were classified as liabilities due to a cashless exercise mechanism are subject to adjustment to fair value each balance sheet cut-off date based on the Black and Scholes model. This adjustment is presented separately within the consolidated statement of loss and other comprehensive loss. The variance year over year is a result of the fair value calculation in each balance sheet cut-off date.

Finance income (expenses), net

Finance income, net, for the year ended December 31, 2017 were $87,000, an increase of $101,000 compared to $14,000 finance expense, net foris contained in our annual report on Form 20-F, filed with the year ended December 31, 2015, The increase was primarily due to changes in currencies exchange rates.

Loss before taxesSEC, on incomeMarch 28, 2019.

 

We incurred loss before taxes on income of $9.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, a decrease of $0.5 million, or 5%, compared to loss before taxes on income of $9.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The decrease was primarily due to $0.5 decrease in operating loss, increase of $0.1 million in finance income, net, partially offset by $0.1 million decrease in profit from change in the fair value of warrants issued to investors.

Taxes on income

Taxes on income for the year ended December 31, 2016, were $28,000, a decrease of $40,000, or 59% compared to $68,000 for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Loss for the year

Loss for the year was $9.0 million, or a loss of $0.26 per basic and diluted share, for the year ended December 31, 2016, a decrease of $0.5 million, compared to loss for the year of $9.5 million, or loss of $0.34 per basic and diluted share, for the year ended December 31, 2015. The decrease was primarily due to $0.5 million decrease in loss before taxes on income.

58

Effective Corporate Tax Rate

 

Our effective consolidated tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162019 and 20152018 was almost zero percent (0%), primarily due to the fact that the Company and ScoutCam Ltd. did not record deferred tax asset in connection with the losses incurred in Israel, since it is not probable that the Companywe will be able to utilize such losses in the foreseeable future against taxable income.

 

Impact of Inflation, Devaluation and Fluctuation in Currencies on Results of Operations, Liabilities and Assets

 

We generate part of our revenues in different currencies than our functional currency (U.S. dollars), such as NIS and Euro. As a result, some of our financial assets are denominated in these currencies, and fluctuations in these currencies could adversely affect our financial results. A considerable amount of our expenses are generated in U.S. dollars, but a significant portion of our expenses such as salaries are generated in other currencies such as NIS. In addition to our operations in Israel, we are expanding our international operations in the European Union. Accordingly, we incur and expect to continue incurring additional expenses in non U.S.non-U.S. dollar currencies, such as described aboveabove.. Due to the mentioned, our results could be adversely affected as a result of a strengthening or weakening of the U.S. Dollar compared to these other currencies.

 

The inflation in Israel during the last several years was relatively immaterial and therefore had immaterial effect on our results of operations.

 

Effective January 1, 2016, we changed our functional currency to the U.S. dollar from NIS. This change was based on management'smanagement’s assessment that the U.S. dollar is the primary currency of the economic environment in which we operates.operate. Accordingly, the functional and reporting currency of our consolidated financial statements is the U.S. dollar.

 


B.Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

Liquidity

 

During the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, we incurred a total comprehensive loss of approximately $2.5$14.2 million and a negative cash flow used in operating activities of approximately $4.7$2.7 million. As of December 31, 2017,2019, we incurred accumulated deficit of approximately $55.9$76.7 million. Based on the projected cash flows, cash and cash equivalents and short-term deposit balances as of December 31, 2017, which totaled to USD 2.8 million and USD 3.5 million, respectively, we are of the opinion that without further fund raising we will not have sufficient resources to enable us to continue our operating activities including the development, manufacturing and marketing of our products for a period of at least 12 months from the date of this report. As a result, there are substantial doubts about our ability to continue as a going concern.At our expected burn rate, our current cash balance will be sufficient until approximately December 2018, taking into account shut down costs.

 

We will need to seek additional sources of funds, including selling additional equity, debt or other securities or entering into a credit facility, take costs reduction steps or modify our current business plan to achieve profitability. If we raise additional funds through the issuance of debt securities, these securities may have rights senior to those of our ordinary shares and could contain covenants that could restrict our operations and ability to issue dividends. We may also require additional capital beyond our currently forecasted amounts. Any required additional capital, whether forecasted or not, may not be available on reasonable terms, or at all. If we are unable to obtain additional financing, we may be required to reduce the scope of, delay or eliminate some or all of our planned research, development and commercialization activities, which could materially harm our business and results of operations.

 

Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with the development of medical devicesour products and the current economic situation, we are unable to estimate the exact amounts of capital outlays and operating expenditures necessary to complete the development of our products and successfully deliver commercial products to the market. Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including but not limited to the following:

 

 ● the revenue generated by sales of our current and future products;
   
 the expenses we incur in selling and marketing our products and supporting our growth;

 

59

 the costs and timing of regulatory clearance or approvals for new products or upgrades or changes to our products;
   
 the expenses we incur in complying with domestic or foreign regulatory requirements imposed on medical device companies;
the expenses associated with achieving a reimbursement code for MUSETM system procedure;
   
 the rate of progress, cost and success or failure of on-going development activities;
   
 the emergence of competing or complementary technological developments;
   
 the costs of filing, prosecuting, defending and enforcing any patent or license claims and other intellectual property rights;
   
 the terms and timing of any collaborative, licensing, or other arrangements that we may establish;
   
 the future unknown impact of recently enacted healthcare legislation;
   
 the acquisition of businesses, products and technologies; and
   
 general economic conditions and interest rates.

 

Cash Flows

 

Operating Activities

 

Net cash used in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 20172019 was $4.7 million,$2,695,000, a decrease of $4.6 million,$1,527,000, compared to net cash used in operating activities of $9.3 million$4,222,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016, which reflect an increase of $2.3 million compared to net cash used in operating activities of $7.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2015.2018.

 

Net cash used in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, consisted primarily of loss for the year before taxes on income of $2.6 million$14,179,000 and profitincrease in inventory of $819,000, partially offset by listing expenses of $10,098,000, stock-based compensation of $259,000, share of losses of associate company of $216,000, increase in other current liabilities of $88,000 and an increase in contract liability of $1,953,000.


Net cash used in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2018, consisted primarily of loss for the year before taxes on change in the fair valueincome of warrants issued to inventors of $3.5 million,$6,578,000, partially offset by issuance expenses which were attributed to the warrants classified as a financial liability and charged directly to profit or loss of $1.0 million.

Net cash used in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2016, consisted primarily$1,565,000, inventory impairment of loss for the year before taxes on income of $9.0 million, an$328,000, increase in inventory of $0.8 million and a decreasecontract liability, increase in accounts payable and accruals of $0.4 million, partially offset by a decrease in accounts receivables of $0.6 million and a decrease in accounts receivables of $0.2 million.

Net cash used in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2015, consisted primarily of loss for the year before taxes on income of $9.5 and a decrease in accounts receivables of $0.4 million, partially offset by net sales of financial assets at fair value through profit or loss of $2.1 millionaccrued compensation expenses and an increase in accounts payable and accrualsother current liabilities of $0.7 million.$396,000.

 

Investing Activities

 

Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 20172019 was $3.5 million, an increase$4,119,000, a decrease of almost $3.5 million,$7,606,000, compared to net cash used ingenerated from investing activities of $38,000$3,487,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016, which reflect a decrease of $58,000 compared to net cash used in investing activities of $96,000 for the year ended December 31, 2015.

60

Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2017, consisted primarily of investment in short-term deposit of $5.0 million, partially offset by withdrawal of short-term deposit of $1.5 million.2018.

 

Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2016,2019, consisted primarily of purchasepayment for acquisition of propertyAlgomizer and equipment of $32,000.Linkury (see note 4 to our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019).

 

Net cash used ingenerated from investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2015,2018, consisted primarily of purchasewithdrawal of property and equipment of $84,000.short-term deposit.

 

Financing Activities

 

Net cash generated from financing activities for the year ended December 31, 20172019 was $7.9 million, an increase$3,156,000, a decrease of $6.0 million,$5,478,000, compared to net cash generated from financing activities of $1.9 million$8,634,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016, which reflect a decrease of $4.9 million compared to net cash generated from financing activities of $6.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2015.2018.

 

Net cash generated from financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, consisted primarily of proceeds from issuancecash obtained in connection with a transaction with non-controlling interest of shares and warrants, net of $7.9 million.$3,202,000 (see note 4 to our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019).

 

Net cash generated from financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2016,2018, consisted primarily of proceeds from issuance of shares and warrants netand from exercise of $1.9 million.

Net cash generated from financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2015, consisted of proceeds from issuance of shares and warrants, net of $6.8 million.issuances costs of $8,634,000.


 

C.Research and Development, Patents and Licenses, Etc.etc.

        

Our research and development efforts are focused on continuous improvement of the MUSE™ system, as well as investment in futureour products. We conduct all of our research activities in Israel. 

 

As of December 31, 2017,2019, our research and development team, including regulatory and quality team members, consisted of eight employees and one consultant.6 employees. In addition, we work with subcontractors for the development of our products as needed. We have assembled an experienced team with recognized expertise in mechanical and electrical engineering, software, control algorithms and systems integration, as well as significant medical and clinical knowledge and expertise.

 

We finance our research and development activities mainly through sale of our products, capital raising and grants received from the IIA. As of December 31, 2017,2019, we had received total aggregated grants of $2.5 million from the IIA. For further information see Item“Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview — Health Care Laws and RegulationsRegulations—Israeli Government Programs.”

 


The table below set forth our research and development expenses for the periods presented:

 

  Year Ended December 31, 
  2017  2016  2015 
  (U.S. Dollars, in thousands) 
Research and development expenses $2,208  $3,655  $4,384 
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2019  2018  2017 
  (U.S. Dollars, in thousands) 
Research and development expenses $609  $1,809   2,208 

 

From time to time we file applications for patent registration in the certain countries, some in which we are active and some which we consider as potential markets in order to protect our developed intellectual property.

61

 

D.Trend Information

 

The following is a description of factors that may influence our future results of operations, including significant trends and challenges that we believe are important to an understanding of our business and results of operations:

 

To date, a significant portion of our revenues was generated from the sale of imaging equipmentour micro ScoutCam portfolio products, development services and the remainder from the sale of the MUSE™MUSE system. The level of our future revenues is hard to predict as it depends on many factors, which most of them are outside of our control. For instance, future revenues from the sale of our products may be adversely affected by current general economic conditions and the resulting tightening of credit markets, which may cause purchasing decisions to be delayed, our customers may have difficulty securing adequate funding to buy our products or, in an extraordinary event, may cause our customers to experience difficulties in complying with their engagements with us. In addition, revenue growth depends on the acceptance of our technology in the market.

 

The healthcare industry in the United States has experienced a trend toward cost containment as government and private insurers seek to manage healthcare costs by imposing lower payment rates and negotiating reduced contract rates with service providers. This trend may result in inadequate coverage for procedures, especially those utilizing new technology, or result in new technology not receiving reimbursement coverage, which may negatively impact utilization of our products. In addition, medical malpractice carriers are withdrawing coverage in certain states or substantially increasing premiums. If this trend continues or worsens, physicians and surgeons may discontinue using our MUSE™ systemproducts or may choose to not purchase it in the future due to the cost or inability to procure insurance coverage. However, we believe there is also a trend for hospitals and physicians to use devices which enable less invasive procedures and to replace older more invasive devices which may result in longer hospital stays and therefore higher medical costs. We believe this trend provides a positive market outlook for our products.

We sell our products using a direct sales force and in certain markets via third-party distributors.. Sales via third-party distributers - we have entered into certain distribution agreements to sell our MUSETM system in Italy, Spain, Switzerland, Liechtenstein, Germany and China (pending achievement of regulatory clearance for our MUSETM system in China).

 

E.Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

We have no material off-balance sheet arrangements

 

F.Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations

 

The following table summarizes our known contractual obligations and commitments as of December 31, 2017:2019:

 

 Total  Less than
1 year
  1 – 3 years  Total  Less than
1 year
  1 – 3 years 
 (U.S. Dollars, in thousands)  (U.S. Dollars, in thousands) 
Car lease obligations  91   49   42   62   28   34 
Premises leasing obligations  85   85       107   101   6 
Total  176   134   42   169   129   40 

 


Other Non-Current Liabilities Reflected on our Balance Sheet:

 

Long-term advancedcontract liabilities payments aggregated to approximately $0.1 million$1,800,000 as of December 31, 2017.2019. For further details, please refersee note 17 to our 2017 consolidated financial statements andfor the related notes included elsewhere in this annual report.

Warrants that were classified as liabilities in our consolidated financial statements aggregated to approximately $0.6 million as ofyear ended December 31, 2017. For further details refer to our 2017 consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this annual report.2019.

 

Retirement benefit obligation, net aggregated to $65,000$5,000 as of December 31, 2017.2019.

Long term lease liabilities aggregated to $33,000 as of December 31, 2019. For further details, referplease see note 10 to our 2017 consolidated financial statements andfor the related notes included elsewhere in this annual report.year ended December 31, 2019.

 

62

ITEM 6.DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES

 

A.Directors and Senior Management

 

The following table lists the names and ages of our directors and senior management:management as of April 15, 2020:

 

Name Age Position(s)
Christopher (Chris) RowlandLiron Carmel 5636 Chief Executive Officer Director
Oded Yatzkan52Chief Financial Officer
Minelu (Menashe) Sonnenschein53VP, Israel Operations
Dr. Yaron Silberman48VP, Sales and Marketing
Amir Govrin51VP, Research and Development
Doron BirgerEliyahu Yoresh(1)(2) 6650 Chairman of the Board of Directors
Eitan MachoverRonen Rosenbloom(1)(2) 5648 Director
Efrat VenkertEli Cohen(1)(2) 51 Director
Yuval YanaiKineret Tzedef(2)(1) 6540 Director
Tatiana Yosef37Chief Financial Officer

  

(1)Member of the audit committee.
(2)

Member of the compensation and investment committees.

committee.

Christopher (Chris) RowlandLiron Carmel has been serving as a member of our Board since March 2013 and as Chief Executive Officer since October 2013. Between 2011April 2019. Mr. Carmel has vast experience in business and 2013,leadership across multiple industries, including bio pharma, internet technology, oil & gas exploration & production, real estate and financial services. In addition he serves as chairman of the Israel Tennis Table Association. Mr. RowlandCarmel served as Presidentthe chief executive officer and director of IntraPace Inc.CannaPowder (PINK: CAPD), a bio-pharma company dedicated to developing and applying innovative technology in the cannabinoid field, from 2017 and 2018. Mr. Carmel previously served as a director of Chiron Refineries Ltd. (TASE: CHR), a company that develops medical equipmentengaged in consulting and initiation of transactions in the refineries field, and as a director of Algomizer Ltd. (TASE: ALMO) which operates in the field of obesity. Mr. Rowland hassoftware development, marketing and distribution to internet users. He also served as Presidentvice president business development at Yaad Givatayim development, a municipal corporation dedicated to initiate, develop and CEOestablish projects of Neo Tract Inc.,public importance. Prior to Yaad Givatayim, Mr. Carmel served as an investment manager and as a medical equipment companyresearch and strategy analyst at Excellence Nessuah, one of the leading companies in the field of urology,provident and as President of Americas Given Imaging Inc. Mr. Rowland holds a B.Sc.advanced studies funds in marketing from the University of Southern Illinois. Mr. Rowland completed the Executive Management Program of Columbia Business School, and the Executive Leadership Program of Harvard Business School.Israel.

 

Oded Yatzkan has served as our Chief Financial Officer since February 2017 and from September 2003 to August 2015. From August 2015 to February 2017, Mr. Yatzkan served as our VP Director of finance and accounting. Since August 2015, Mr. Yatzkan is also serving as an external director at Oron Group Holdings and Investments. Mr. Yatzkan previously served as Controller and Administrative Director of the Be’er Sheva Municipal Theatre from 1997 to 2003, as an Internal Auditor of Pandor Ltd., a TASE-listed Israeli company, from 1999 to 2001, as Assistant to Chief Financial Manager of Gold & Honey Ltd. Mr. Yatzkan is a licensed CPA, and holds a BA in Economics with a specialization in Accounting and an MBA with specialization in finance, both from Ben-Gurion University of Be’er Sheva, Israel.

Minelu (Menashe) Sonnenschein is a founding member and officer of our company who has been serving as our VP, Israel Operations since June 2014. Among other roles, Mr. Sonnenschein previously served as our Director of Research and Development and has been directly responsible for the development of the MUSETM System since the founding of the Company. Mr. Sonnenschein holds a M.Sc. in Electrical and Electronics Engineering from Ben-Gurion University of Be’er Sheva, Israel.

Dr. Yaron Silberman has been serving as VP, Sales and Marketing since January 2011. Dr. Silberman has served as Marketing Director of Niti Surgical Solutions Ltd., and as Product Manager of Given Imaging Ltd. Dr. Silberman holds a PhD in Computational Neuroscience and Data Processing from Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel, an MBA from the College of Management Academic Studies of Rishon Le’Zion, Israel, and a B.A. in Theoretical Mathematics from The Technion Institute of Technology, Israel.

Amir Govrinhas been serving as VP, research and development since 2017. Prior to that, Mr. Govrin held several positions at the Company since 2003, including research and development manager and mechanical development manager. Mr. Govrin hold a B.Sc. in Mechanical Engendering from the Tel Aviv University.

63

Doron Birger has been serving as a member of our Board since May 2015 and as Chairman of our Board since August 2017. Mr. Birger currently serves as a director of MCS Medical Compression Ltd. (TASE:MDCL) and Icecure Medical Ltd. (TASE:ICCM), and as chairman and director of several private companies in Israel in the hi-tech sector mainly in the medical device field. From 2002 to 2007, Mr. Birger served as the chairman of the board of directors of Given Imaging Ltd. and later on as board member until February 2014. Mr. Birger served as chief executive officer of Elron Electronic Industries, Ltd., or Elron, from August 2002 to April 2009. Prior to that, he held other executive positions at Elron, including President since 2001, Chief Financial Officer from 1994 to August 2002, and Corporate Secretary from 1994 to 2001. Mr. Birger is a director of variety of none profit organizations in Israel. Mr. Birger holds a B.A. and an M.A. in economics from the Hebrew University Jerusalem.

Eitan Machoverhas been serving as a member of our Board since September 29, 2016. Mr. Machover has been the Principal and Owner of EM Advisory Services since August 2011. Mr. Machover is a Partner at Ziegler Meditech Equity Partners, L.P., a find specializing in the medical device space, since January 2006. He serves as the fund’s representative on the board of directors of numerous public and private companies, including: Brenmiller Energy, Ltd. (TASE:BRNG), since July 2017; WCG Properties, Ltd. (TASE:WCG.B2), since June 2017; Electra Real Estate (TASE:ELTR), since October 2014; Related Commercial Portfolio, Ltd. (TASE:RLCM:B1), since July 2015 and MedyMatch Ltd. since December 2014. Mr. Machover served as Chief Executive Officer at Enhanced Surface Dynamics Inc. (Wellsense) from January 2013 to April 2014. He was the VC Partner at Meditech Advisors LLC from January 2003 to August 2011. Mr. Machover previously held various business development and M&A positions at GE Capital in the U.S., Europe and Asia from 1989 until May 2010, and led integrations into GE's Israeli operations, having been named the National Executive for General Electric Israel, overseeing all of GE's activities in Israel. Mr. Machover holds a BS in Business Communications from Emerson College, Boston, Massachusetts, and MBA in Finance and Marketing from Boston College.

Efrat VenkertEliyahu Yoresh has been serving as a member of our Board since September 2013. Ms. Venkert is2018 and as our Chairman of the ownerboard since February 2020. Mr. Yoresh serves as chief financial officer of a law firm specializing in legal advice to companiesForesight Autonomous Holdings Ltd. (Nasdaq, TASE: FRSX) and in business law. From 2009 to 2010, Ms. VenkertAsia Group. In addition, Mr. Yoresh has served as a memberdirector of an advisory group advising to the Government Investigation Committee for the water sector. From 2007 to 2009, Ms. VenkertNano Dimension Ltd. (Nasdaq, TASE: NNDM) and as a director of Geffen Biomed Investments Ltd. and Greenstone Industries Ltd. Mr. Yoresh served as the chairperson secretarychief executive officer of Tomcar Global Holdings Ltd., a global manufacturer of off-road vehicles, from 2005 to 2008. Mr. Yoresh is an Israeli Certified Public Accountant. Yoresh acquired a B.A. in business administration from the Steering Committee, and Chairperson Manager of the Ministry of Justice and Ministry of Welfare pilot project on the subject of changes in the legislation of minors’ participation in legal proceedings and from 2004 to 2008 Ms. Venkert served as a lecturer in the Law Faculty of the University of Haifa. Ms. Venkert holds an LL.B. from Hebrew University, Jerusalem,Business College, Israel and an MBAM.A. in Law Study from HaifaBar-Ilan University, Haifa, Israel. Ms. Venkert is a Certified Mediator of ICNM, a graduate of the Companies Secretary Course of the Israel Management Center, and a graduate of Directors’ Course, Lahav, Tel-Aviv University, Israel.

 

Yuval YanaiRonen Rosenbloom was appointed by our Board to servehas been serving as a member of our Board since FebruarySeptember 2018. Mr. Yanai currentlyRosenbloom is an independent lawyer working out of a self-owned law firm specializing in white collar offences. Mr. Rosenbloom serves as chairman of the Israeli Money Laundering Prohibition committee and the Prohibition of Money Laundering Committee of the Tel Aviv District, both of the Israel Bar Association. Mr. Rosenbloom previously served as a police prosecutor in the Tel Aviv District. Mr. Rosenbloom holds an LL.B. from the Ono Academic College, an Israeli branch of University of Manchester.


Eli Cohen has been serving as a member of the boardour Board since September 2018. Mr. Cohenis an independent lawyer working out of directorsa self-owned firm. He serves as chairman of Mazor RoboticsUnivo Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (NASDAQ:MZOR; TASE:MZOR), Check-Capas director of Europe Hagag Ltd. (NASDAQ:CHEK), and Clal Biotechnologyhas previously served as director of Hagag Group Ltd. (TASE:CBI)., Multimatrixs Ltd., Matrat Mizug Ltd. and User Trend-M Ltd. Mr. YanaiCohen also serves as a director of Hadassah Medical Centerseveral private companies. Mr. Cohen holds an economics degree, an LL.B. and Standard & Poors Maalot, EfranatLL.M in Commercial Law from Tel-Aviv University, as well as an MBA from the Northwestern University and Tel-Aviv University joint program.

Kineret Tzedefhas been serving as member of our Board since June 2019. Ms. Tzedef also serves as a director of sport division and served in other positions at Hapoel Organization (Israeli Sport Federation) since 2007. Ms. Tzedef is the president of Israeli Gymnastics Federation since 2018. Ms. Tzedef serves as an external director at Chiron Refineries Ltd. (TASE: CHR), Endobetix Ltd., Nobio Ltd. and as an external director of Biomedico Hadarim Ltd. (TASE: BIMCM). Ms. Tzedef is admitted to the chairman ofIsrael Bar Association since 2014. Ms. Tzedef acquired a LL.B from the Israeli FundAcademic Center for UNICEF. Mr. Yanai servedLaw and Science, Israel and a B.Ed. in Law Study from the Academic College at Wingate, Israel.

Tatiana Yosefhas been serving as Senior Vice Presidentour Chief Financial Officer since March 22, 2019 and as Chief Financial Officer of Given Imaging Ltd. from September 2005 through March 2014. Prior to that, from October 2000 through August 2005, Mr. Yanaiour majority held subsidiary ScoutCam, Inc. since December 27, 2019. Ms. Yosef is a certified public accountant with many years of experience, who has served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officerthe Company’s controller since December 2009. During 2008-2009 Ms. Yosef worked in the audit department at Kesselman& Kesselman, a member firm of Koor Industries Ltd. (TASE:KOOR), and from April 1998 to September 2000, Mr. Yanai served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of NICE Systems Ltd. (NASDAQ:NICE; TASE:NICE). Mr. YanaiPricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited. Ms. Yosef holds a B.A.Bachelor degree in Economics and Accounting and Economics from Tel-Aviv University.the Ben-Gurion University of the Negev.

Mr. Chris Rowland, the former chief executive officer of the Company has stepped down effective as of February 28, 2019. Following such date, the board of directors undertook Mr. Rowland’s responsibilities until the appointment of Liron Carmel as Chief Executive Officer.

On December 31, 2019, Benad Goldwasser stepped down as chairman of our board of directors in order to focus his efforts on ScoutCam where he serves as chairman of the board of directors. On February 2, 2020 our board of directors appointed Eliyahu Yoresh as chairman of the board of directors to replace Benad Goldwasser.

Family Relationships

 

There are no family relationships between any members of our executive management and our directors.

 

Arrangements for Election of Directions and Members of Management

 

There are no arrangements or understandings with major shareholders, customers, suppliers or others pursuant to which any of our executive management or our directors were appointed.

 

64

B.Compensation

 

Compensation of Executive Officers

 

In accordance with the provisions of the Companies Law, the compensation of our directors and officer holders must generally comply with the terms and conditions of our compensation policy, as approved by our compensation committee, board of directors and general meeting of our shareholders, subject to certain exceptions under the Companies Law. Our current compensation policy was approved by our general meeting on December 29, 2015.January 9, 2019 and a subsequent amendment was approved by our general meeting on July 25, 2019.

 


The table below reflects the compensation granted to our five most highly compensated office holders (as defined in the Companies Law) during or with respect to the year ended December 31, 2017:2019:

 

Name and Position Salary(1)  Bonus  Equity-Based
Compensation(2)
  All
other
compensation(3)
  Total 
  U.S. Dollars in thousands 
Christopher (Chris) Rowland 
Chief Executive Officer
  347   120   11   -   478 
Minelu (Menashe) Sonnenschein 
VP, Israel Operations
  165   34   7   27   233 
Yaron Silberman 
VP, Sales and Marketing
  149   32   7   20   208 
Oded Yatzkan
Chief Financial Officer
  155   38   6   17   216 
Amir Govrin
VP, Research and Development
  146   24   5   16   191 
Name and Position Salary(1)  Bonus  Equity-Based
Compensation(2)
  All
other
compensation(3)
  Total 
  U.S. Dollars in thousands 
Liron Carmel 
Chief Executive Officer
  102   46             54             -   202 
Christopher (Chris) Rowland(4) 
Former Chief Executive Officer
  72   -   56   -   128 
Tatiana Yosef
Chief Financial Officer
  85   -   2   -   87 
Minelu (Menashe) Sonnenschein(5) 
Former VP, Israel Operations
  39   22   (7)  8   62 
Eliyahu Yoresh 
Chairman of the Board of Directors(6) 
  24   -   37   -   61 
Eli Cohen
Director
  24   -   37   -   61 
Ronen Rosenbloom
Director
  24       37   -   61 

 

(1)Salary includes the office holdersholders’ gross salary plus payment of social benefits made by us on behalf of such office holder. Such benefits may include, to the extent applicable to the office holder, payments, contributions and/or allocations for savings funds (such as managers’ life insurance policy), education funds (referred to in Hebrew as “keren hishtalmut”), pension, severance, risk insurances (e.g., life, or work disability insurance), payments for social security and tax gross-up payments, vacation, medical insurance and benefits, convalescence or recreation pay and other benefits and perquisites consistent with our policies.
  
(2)Represents the equity-based compensation expenses recorded in the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, based on the option’s fair value, calculated in accordance with accounting guidance for equity-based compensation.
  
(3)Includes car expenses.
(4)Mr. Rowland stepped down from his position as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, effective February 28, 2019. Such compensation does not reflect severance payment equal to six (6) months’ in the amount of $157,500 that was included in our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018.
(5)Mr. Sonnenschein stepped down from his position as the Company’s VP Israel Operations, effective March 31, 2019.
(6)Mr. Yoresh has been serving as a member of our Board since September 2018 and as our Chairman of the board since February 2020.

 

The aggregate compensation paid by us to our office holders (as defined in the Companies Law) (7 persons, including our former executive officersofficers) for the year ended December 31, 20172019 was approximately $1.4 million.$0.6 million. This amount includes, when applicable, set aside or accrued to provide pension, severance, retirement or similar benefits or expenses, car expenses and value of the ordinary shares underlying the options representing accounting expenses, but does not include business travel, relocation, professional and business association dues and expenses reimbursed to officers, and other benefits commonly reimbursed or paid by companies in Israel.

 

As of December 31, 2017, the total amount set aside as an actuarial estimate by the Company to provide post-employment benefits for our office holders was approximately $42,000.

Compensation of Directors

 

Under the Companies Law and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, our directors are entitled to fixed annual compensation and to an additional payment for each meeting attended. We currently pay Mr. Eitan Machover,Ronen Rosenbloom, Ms. Efrat VenkertKineret Tzedef and Mr. Yuval YanaiEli Cohen an annual fee of NIS 37,115 and a per meeting fee of NIS1,860, and pay Mr. Doron Birger, 1,860.

We paid Prof. Benad Goldwasser, our former chairman of the board of directors, an annual fee of NIS 37,115 and a per meeting fee of NIS2,480 as well as a monthly consultancy fee in connection with his services as chairman of the board of directors of ScoutCam Ltd., all in accordance with the director fees allowed pursuant to applicable regulations under the Companies Law, as applicable to the Company. We currently do not pay Mr. Christopher Rowland any cash fees for his service as a director. The aggregate amount paid by us to our directors for the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, was approximately $71,000.$200 thousands.

 

65

In addition, during 20172019, we granted each of Prof. Benad Goldwasser, Mr. Doron Birger,Ronen Rosenbloom, Mr. Eitan MachoverEliyahu Yoresh and Ms. Efrat VenkertMr. Eli Cohen options to purchase up to 750,000 ordinary shares of the Company with the following terms: (i) thea vesting schedule of the options shall be over a four (4)three (3) year period commencing on October 1, 2018, with a one fourth1/12 of such options vest onvesting at the end of each anniversary ofsubsequent three-month period following the grant, (ii) thea term of the options shall be of six (6) years after the grant date, unless theythe options have been exercised or cancelled in accordance with the terms of and conditions of the applicable incentive plan of the Company, (iii) unless previously exercised or cancelled, the options may be exercised until 180 days from the termination of the tenure of a director, (iv) the exercise price per share of the options is NIS 0.1620.59 per ordinary share, and (iv) acceleration(v) the options will be accelerated upon the closing of a material transaction, resulting in change of control.control of the Company.

 

On February 2, 2020, our compensation committee and board of directors approved new compensation terms for Mr. Eliyahu Yoresh in connection with his services as an active chairman of the board of directors. For his services, Mr. Yoresh shall be entitled to receive a monthly payment of NIS15,000 which shall constitute the sole and complete compensation. Mr. Yoresh will not be entitled to a per meeting fee. The aforementioned compensation terms are subject to the approval of the Company’s shareholders in accordance with the Companies Law.

Equity Based Compensation of our Executive Officers and Directors

 

As of MarchApril 15, 2018,2020, options to purchase 7,839,0003,524,950 of our ordinary shares were outstanding and held by current executive officers and directors (consisting of nine5 persons) with an average exercise price of NIS 0.720.62 per ordinary share, of which, options to purchase 618,2501,451,450 of our ordinary shares are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days as of MarchApril 15, 2018.2020. See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—E. Share Ownership” in this annual report on Form 20-F.

 

Employment Agreements

 

We have entered into written employment agreements with each of our executive officers. All of these agreements contain customary provisions regarding non-competition, confidentiality of information and assignment of inventions. However, the enforceability of the noncompetition provisions may be limited under applicable law. In addition, we have entered into agreements with each executive officer and director pursuant to which we have agreed to indemnify each of them to the fullest extent permitted by law to the extent that these liabilities are not covered by directors and officers insurance.

 

Our office holders are generally eligible for bonuses each year. The bonuses are established and granted in accordance with our compensation policy and, and are generally payable upon meeting objectives and targets that are approved by our compensation committee and board of directors (and if required by our shareholders).

 

EmploymentConsulting Agreement with Mr. RowlandCarmel

On September 29, 2013,July 25, 2019, our shareholders approved that as of October 1, 2013, our U.S. Subsidiary, Medigus USA LLC,April 2, 2019, the Company would enter into an employmenta consulting agreement with Mr. Rowland,Carmel, who serves as our Chief Executive Officer and currently carries out his work from our U.S. Subsidiary’s office in California, USA.Officer. The agreement has aemployment term of 3 years, and may be automatically renewedis for additional periods of one year unless either party gives 60 days advance notice of non-renewal ofan indefinite period, however the agreement. The agreement may be terminated by either party by giving 60 days advance notice, or shorter periods in some cases.cases, such as termination for “cause”. During the notice period, Mr. Carmel will be entitled to consulting fees only to the extent that he provides services to the Company during the notice period.

 

In accordance with the employmentconsulting agreement, with Mr. Rowland, heCarmel is entitled to an annual base salarya monthly consulting fee of $315,000.NIS 36,000 + VAT for 80% position and reimbursement of business expenses in accordance with our policies from time to time. In addition, by meeting certain pre-determined milestones or goals, set by our board of directors, Mr. RowlandCarmel may be entitled to an annual targetcash bonus which mayof up to NIS 215,000 + VAT, based on a discretionary component of not exceed 35%more than 25% and measurable objectives to be determined by our compensation committee and approved by our board of Mr. Rowland’s annual base salary.directors for the applicable fiscal year. The annual target bonus may be reduced by our board of directors according to our financial position and Mr. Rowland’sCarmel’s performance, and must be returned by Mr. RowlandCarmel if it is later shown to be granted in error which shall be restated in our financial statements.

 

Mr. Rowland is also entitled to various social benefits, such as medical and dental insurance, for himself and his immediate family, participation in a “401(k)” plan (similar to provident fund in Israel), and a manager’s insurance plan, which may not exceed total inclusive costs of 25% of his annual salary (approximately $79,000).

66

In the event that we terminate Mr. Rowland’s employment without cause or if we elect not to renew his employment, Mr. Rowland will be entitled to (i) receive the amounts owed to him up to the termination of his employment, (ii) receive a severance payment in an amount equal to six monthly base salaries (total inclusive amount of approximately $158,000), (iii) continue his group health and dental insurance following the date of termination until the earlier of the six months anniversary of the date of termination or until an alternate employer assumes his group health and dental insurance (subject to certain conditions), (iv) a pro-rated incentive payment for the quarter or a year in which his employment is terminated subject to the attainment of established targets, and (v) acceleration of option vesting.

On September 29, 2013, our shareholders approved a grant of options under the 2013 Share Option and Incentive Plan exercisable into 450,000 of our ordinary shares to Mr. Rowland, for an exercise price of NIS 8.3 per share, of which 3,200,000 options vest over a period of 24 months, commencing one year following the start of his employment, 650,000 options vested on June 30, 2014, following achievement of goals set by the board of directors, and the remaining 650,000 options were to vest on February 1, 2015, subject to achieving the goals set by the board of directors, and the latter 650,000 options expired on March 31, 2015 following a decision by the board of directors. The options granted will expire at the earliest of: (a) following 5 years from the start date of the agreement; (b) 180 days from the date Mr. Rowland’s employment shall end or he shall resign; or (c) immediately following the dismissal of Mr. Rowland, for various causes. In addition, options not vested by the termination of Mr. Rowland’s employment agreement shall expire at such date.

On December 29, 2015, our shareholders approved a grant of options under the 2013 Share Option and Incentive Plan to purchase 100,000 of our ordinary shares to Mr. Rowland, for an exercise price of NIS 2.05, which vest annually in four equal parts over four years. The optionsCarmel was granted will expire at the earliest of: (a) 6 years following the grant date; or (b) at the time at which the options expire pursuant to the terms of 2013 Share Option and Incentive Plan. In addition, options not vested by the termination of Mr. Rowland’s employment agreement shall expire at such date.

On August 15, 2017, our shareholders approved a grant ofwith options to purchase up to 1,750,000 ordinary shares1,250,000 Ordinary Shares of the Company (the “Options”), in accordance with the following terms: (i) the vesting scheduleOptions shall vest over a period of four (4) years commencing April 1, 2019, 25% of the optionsOptions shall bevest on the first anniversary (i.e., April 1, 2020), and 75% of the Options shall vest on a quarterly basis over a four (4) year period with a one fourth of such options vest on each anniversary of the grant,three (3) years thereafter; (ii) the term of the optionsOptions shall be of six (6) years afterfrom the date of grant, date, unless they have been exercised or cancelled in accordance with the terms of and conditions of the applicable incentive plan of the Company, (iii) unless previously exercised or cancelled, the Options may be exercised until 180 days from the date of termination of the service, (iv) the exercise price per share of the options isOptions shall be NIS 0.162 per ordinary share,0.59, (v) the Options’ grant shall be in accordance and (iv) accelerationpursuant to Section 102 of the Income Tax Ordinance [New Version], and (vi) the Options shall be accelerated upon the closing of a material transaction, resulting in change of control.control of the Company. 

The agreement also includes customary covenants regarding confidentiality, IP assignment, non-competition and non-solicitation.

Employment Agreement with Mr. Rowland

On September 29, 2013, our shareholders approved that as of October 1, 2013, our subsidiary, Medigus U.S., would enter into an employment agreement with Mr. Rowland, who served as our Chief Executive Officer and carried out his work from Medigus U.S.’s office in California, USA until February 28, 2019. In accordance with his employment agreement, Mr. Rowland was entitled to an annual base salary of $315,000.

On January 10, 2019, the Company entered into a separation agreement with Mr. Rowland, pursuant to which Mr. Rowland stepped down from his position as chief executive officer, effective February 28, 2019. As part of the separation agreement, Mr. Rowland was entitled to receive all accrued but unpaid sums including earned but unpaid incentive payments for 2018 in the amount of $88,200 and severance payment equal to six (6) months’ in the amount of $157,500.

 

C.Board Practices

 

Introduction

 

Under the Companies Law and our articles of association, the management of our business is vested in our board of directors. Our board of directors may exercise all powers and may take all actions that are not specifically granted to our shareholders or to management. Our executive officers are responsible for our day-to-day management and have individual responsibilities established by our board of directors. Our chief executive officer is appointed by the general meeting of our shareholders, subject to his personal contract with the Company.

 

Under our articles of association, our board of directors must consist of at least three and not more than 12 directors, not including two external directors appointed as required under the Companies Law. Our board of directors currently consists of fivefour members, none of which are external directors, including our non-executive chairman of the board of directors, which is also appointed by the general meeting of our shareholders. Our directors are nominated by our independent directors and elected at the annual general meeting of our shareholders by a simple majority. Because our ordinary shares do not have cumulative voting rights in the election of directors, the holders of a majority of the voting power represented at a shareholders meeting have the power to elect all of our directors. The general meeting of our shareholders may resolve, at any time, by an ordinary majority resolution prior to the termination of his respective term of service and it may appoint another director in his place, provided that the director was given a reasonable opportunity to state his case before the general meeting.

 

67

In addition, if a director’s office becomes vacant, the remaining serving directors may continue to act in any manner, provided that their number is of the minimal number specified in our articles of association. If the number of serving directors is lower than three, then our board of directors shallwill not be permitted to act, other than for the purpose of convening a general meeting of the Company’s shareholders for the purpose of appointing additional directors. In addition, the directors may appoint, immediately or of a future date, additional director(s) to serve until the subsequent annual general meeting of our shareholders, provided that the total number of directors in office shalldo not exceed twelve directors (not including external directors).

 


Pursuant to the Companies Law and our articles of association, a resolution proposed at any meeting of our board of directors at which a quorum is present is adopted if approved by a vote of a majority of the directors present and eligible to vote. A quorum of the board of directors requires at least a majority of the directors then in office who are lawfully entitled to participate in the meeting.

 

According to the Companies Law, the board of directors of a public company must determine the minimum number of board members that should have financial and accounting expertise while considering, among other, the nature of the company, its size, the scope and complexity of its operations and the number of directors stated in the articles of association. Our board of directors resolved that the minimum number of board members that need to have financial and accounting expertise is one and that Mr. Doron Birger, Mr. Eitan Machover and Mr. Yuval Yanai haveEliyahu Yoresh has accounting and financial expertise as required under the Companies Law.

 

External Directors

 

Under the Companies Law, companies incorporated under the laws of the State of Israel that are “public companies,” including companies with shares listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market, are required to appoint at least two external directors. External directors must meet certain independence criteria to ensure that they are unaffiliated with the company and its controlling shareholder, as well certain other criteria. External directors are elected for three-year terms in accordance with specific rules set forth in the Companies Law and the regulations promulgated thereunder and may be removed from office only under limited circumstances. Under the Companies Law, each committee of a company’s board of directors that is authorized to exercise powers of the board of directors is required to include at least one external director, and all external directors must be members of the company’s audit committee and compensation committee.

 

Pursuant to regulations promulgated under the Companies Law, companies with shares traded on a U.S. stock exchange, including the Nasdaq Capital Market, may, subject to certain conditions, “opt out” from the Companies Law requirements to appoint external directors and related Companies Law rules concerning the composition of the audit committee and compensation committee of the board of directors. In accordance with these regulations, effective of June 28, 2017, we have “opted out” from the Companies Law requirements to appoint external directors and related Companies Law rules concerning the composition of the audit committee and compensation committee of the board of directors.

 

Under these regulations, the exemptions from such Companies Law requirements will continue to be available to us so long as: (i) we do not have a “controlling shareholder” (as such term is defined under the Companies Law), (ii) our shares are traded on a U.S. stock exchange, including the Nasdaq Capital Market, and (iii) we comply with the director independence requirements, the audit committee and the compensation committee composition requirements, under U.S. laws (including applicable Nasdaq Rules) applicable to U.S. domestic issuers.

 

Alternate directors

 

Our articles of association provide, as allowed by the Companies Law, that any director may, by written notice to us, appoint another person who is qualified to serve as a director to serve as an alternate director and to terminate such appointment. Under the Companies Law, a person who is not qualified to be appointed as a director, a person who is already serving as a director or a person who is already serving as an alternate director for another director, may not be appointed as an alternate director. Nevertheless, a director who is already serving as a director may be appointed as an alternate director for a member of a committee of the board of directors as long as he or she is not already serving as a member of such committee.

 

68

Board committees

 

The board of directors may, subject to the provisions of the Companies Law, delegate any or all of its powers to committees, each consisting of one or more directors (except the audit and compensation committees, as described below), and it may, from time to time, revoke such delegation or alter the composition of any such committees. Unless otherwise expressly provided by the board of directors, the committees shallwill not be empowered to further delegate such powers. The composition and duties of our audit committee and compensation committee are described below.

 


Audit committee

 

Our audit committee is currently comprised of Ms. Efrat Venkert, Mr. Eitan Machover,Eli Cohen, Mr. Doron BirgerEliyahu Yoresh, and Mr. Yuval Yanai. Ms. Efrat VenkertRonen Rosenbloom. Mr. Eli Cohen acts as the chairperson of our audit committee.

 

Companies Law Requirements

 

Under the Companies Law, our board of directors is required to appoint an audit committee, which is responsible, among others, for:

 

 (i)determining whether there are deficiencies in the business management practices of our Company, including in consultation with our internal auditor or the independent auditor, and making recommendations to our board of directors to improve such practices;

 

 (ii)determining the approval process for transactions that are ‘non-negligible’ (i.e., transactions with a controlling shareholder that are classified by the audit committee as non-negligible, even though they are not deemed extraordinary transactions), as well as determining which types of transactions would require the approval of the audit committee, optionally based on criteria which may be determined annually in advance by the audit committee;

 

 (iii)determining whether to approve certain related party transactions (including transactions in which an office holder has a personal interest and whether such transaction is extraordinary or material under Companies Law. See “— Fiduciary duties and approval of specified related party transactions and compensation under Israeli law".law.”

 

 (iv)where the board of directors approves the working plan of the internal auditor, to examine such working plan before its submission to our board of directors and proposing amendments thereto;

 

 (v)examining our internal controls and internal auditor’s performance, including whether the internal auditor has sufficient resources and tools to dispose of its responsibilities;

 

 (vi)examining the scope of our auditor’s work and compensation and submitting a recommendation with respect thereto to our board of directors or shareholders, depending on which of them is considering the appointment of our auditor; and

 

 (vii)establishing procedures for the handling of employees’ complaints as to the management of our business and the protection to be provided to such employees.

 

Nasdaq requirements

 

Under the NASDAQNasdaq corporate governance rules, we are required to maintain an audit committee consisting of at least three independent directors, all of whom are financially literate and one of whom has accounting or related financial management expertise. All members of our audit committee meet the requirements for financial literacy under the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and the NASDAQNasdaq corporate governance rules. Our board of directors has determined that each of Mr. Doron Birger, Mr. Eitan Machover and Mr. Yuval YanaiEliyahu Yoresh is an audit committee financial expert as defined by the SEC rules and has the requisite financial experience as defined by the NASDAQNasdaq Marketplace Rules.

69

 

Each of the members of the audit committee is required to be “independent” as such term is defined in Rule 10A-3(b)(1) under the Exchange Act, which is different from the general test for independence of board and committee members. Our board of directors has determined that each member of our audit committee is independent as such term is defined in Rule 10A-3(b)(1) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 


Audit committee role

 

Our board of directors has adopted an audit committee charter setting forth the responsibilities of the audit committee consistent with the rules of the SEC and the Nasdaq Rules, which include, among others:

 

retaining and terminating our independent auditors, subject to the ratification of the board of directors, and in the case of retention, to that of the shareholders;

 

pre-approving of audit and non-audit services and related fees and terms, to be provided by the independent auditors;

 

overseeing the accounting and financial reporting processes of our company and audits of our financial statements, the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and making such reports as may be required of an audit committee under the rules and regulations promulgated under the Exchange Act;

 

reviewing with management and our independent auditor our annual and quarterly financial statements prior to publication or filing (or submission, as the case may be) to the SEC;

 

recommending to the board of directors the retention and termination of the internal auditor, and the internal auditor'sauditor’s engagement fees and terms, in accordance with the Companies Law as well as approving the yearly or periodic work plan proposed by the internal auditor.

 

reviewing with our general counsel and/or external counsel, as deem necessary, legal and regulatory matters that could have a material impact on the financial statements;

 

identifying irregularities in our business administration, inter alia, by consulting with the internal auditor or with the independent auditor, and suggesting corrective measures to the board of directors; and

 

reviewing policies and procedures with respect to transactions (other than transactions related to the compensation or terms of services) between the company and officers and directors, or affiliates of officers or directors, or transactions that are not in the ordinary course of the company’s business and deciding whether to approve such acts and transactions if so required under the Companies Law.

 

The audit committee charter states that in fulfilling its obligations, the committee is entitled to demand from usthe Company any document, file, report or any other information that is required for the fulfillment of its roles and duties and to interview any of our employees or any employees of our subsidiaries in order to receive more details about his or her line of work or other issues that are connected to the roles and duties of the audit committee.

 

Compensation Committee

 

Our compensation committee is currently comprised of Mr. Ronen Rosenbloom, Mr. Eli Cohen and Ms. Efrat Venkert,Kineret Tzedef. Mr. Eitan Machover and Mr. Doron Birger. Mr. Eitan MachoverRonen Rosenbloom acts as the chairperson of our compensation committee.

 

70

Companies Law requirements

 

Under the Companies Law, the board of directors of a public company must appoint a compensation committee which roles are, among others, as follows:

 

to recommend to the board of directors the approval of compensation policy for directors and officers in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Law;

 

to oversee the development and implementation of such compensation policy and recommending to the board of directors regarding any amendments or modifications that the compensation committee deems appropriate;

  

to determine whether to approve transactions concerning the terms of engagement and employment of office holders that require approval of the compensation committee; and

 

to resolve whether to exempt a transaction with a candidate for chief executive officer from shareholder’s approval.

 


Nasdaq requirements

 

Our board of directors has adopted a compensation committee charter setting forth the responsibilities of the committee consistent with the Nasdaq Rules, which include among others:

 

recommending to the our board of directors for its approval a compensation policy in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Law as well as other compensation policies, incentive-based compensation plans and equity-based compensation plans, and overseeing the development and implementation of such policies and recommending to our board of directors any amendments or modifications to the committee deems appropriate, including as required under the Companies Law;

 

reviewing and approving the granting of options and other incentive awards to theour chief executive officer and other executive officers, including reviewing and approving corporate goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of our chief executive officer and other executive officers, including evaluating their performance in light of such goals and objectives;

 

approving and exempting certain transactions regarding office holders’ compensation pursuant to the Companies Law; and

 

administer the our equity-based compensation plans, including without limitation to approve the adoption of such plans, to amend and interpret such plans and the awards and agreements issued pursuant thereto, and to make awards to eligible persons under the plans and determine the terms of such awards. 

 

The compensation committee is also authorized to retain and terminate compensation consultants, legal counsel or other advisors to the committee and to approve the engagement of any such consultant, counsel or advisor, to the extent it deems necessary or advisable.

 

Our board of directors has determined that each member of our compensation committee is independent under the Nasdaq Rules, including the additional independence requirements applicable to the members of a compensation committee.

 

Compensation policy

 

Under the Companies Law, companies incorporated under the laws of the State of Israel, whose shares are listed for trading on a stock exchange or have been offered to the public in or outside of Israel, such as us, are required to adopt a policy governing the compensation of “office holders” (as defined in the Companies Law). Following the recommendation of our compensation committee and approval by our board of directors, our shareholders approved our current compensation policy at our annualspecial general meeting of shareholders held on December 29, 2015.January 9, 2019 as well as certain amendments to the policy approved by our shareholders on July 25, 2019. Our compensation policy must be approved at least once every three years, first, by our board of directors, upon recommendation of our compensation committee, and second, by a simple majority of the ordinary shares present, in person or by proxy, and voting at a shareholders meeting, provided that either:

 

such majority includes at least a majority of the shares held by shareholders who are not controlling shareholders and do not have a personal interest in such compensation arrangement and who are present and voting (excluding abstentions); or

 

 71

the total number of shares of non-controlling shareholders and shareholders who do not have a personal interest in the compensation arrangement and who vote against the arrangement, does not exceed 2% of the company’s aggregate voting rights.

 

Such majority determined in accordance with the majority requirement described above is hereinafter referred to as the Compensation Special Majority Requirement.

 


To the extent a compensation policy is not approved by shareholders at a duly convened shareholders meeting or by the Compensation Special Majority Requirement, the board of directors of a company may override the resolution of the shareholders following a re-discussion of the matter by the board of directors and the compensation committee and for specified reasons, and after determining that despite the rejection by the shareholders, the adoption of the compensation policy is in the best interest of the company. A compensation policy that is for a period of more than three years must be approved in accordance with the above procedure once every three years.

 

The compensation policy must serve as the basis for decisions concerning the financial terms of employment or engagement of office holders, including exculpation, insurance, indemnification or any monetary payment or obligation of payment in respect of employment or engagement. The compensation policy must relate to certain factors, including advancement of the company’s objectives, the company’s business plan and its long-term strategy, and creation of appropriate incentives for office holders. It must also consider, among other things, the company’s risk management, size and the nature of its operations. The compensation policy must furthermore consider the following additional factors:

 

the knowledge, skills, expertise and accomplishments of the relevant office holder;

 

the office holder’s roles and responsibilities and prior compensation agreements with him or her;

 

the ratio between the cost of the terms of employment of an office holder and the cost of the compensation of the other employees of the company, including those employed through manpower companies, in particular the ratio between such cost and the average and median compensation of the other employees of the company, as well as the impact such disparities may have on the work relationships in the company;

 

the possibility of reducing variable compensation, if any, at the discretion of the board of directors; and the possibility of setting a limit on the exercise value of non-cash variable equity-based compensation; and

 

as to severance compensation, if any, the period of service of the office holder, the terms of his or her compensation during such service period, the company’s performance during that period of service, the person’s contribution towards the company’s achievement of its goals and the maximization of its profits, and the circumstances under which the person is leaving the company.

 

The compensation policy must also include the following principles:

 

the link between variable compensation and long-term performance and measurable criteria;

 

the relationship between variable and fixed compensation, and the ceiling for the value of variable compensation;

 

 72

the conditions under which an office holder would be required to repay compensation paid to him or her if it was later shown that the data upon which such compensation was based was inaccurate and was required to be restated in the company’s financial statements;

 

the minimum holding or vesting period for variable, equity-based compensation; and

 

maximum limits for severance compensation.

 

Investment Committee

74

 

Our investment committee consists of three directors, Ms. Efrat Venkert, Mr. Eitan Machover and Mr. Doron Birger. Mr. Eitan Machover acts as the chairperson of our investment committee. The investment committee’s duties include reviewing and making recommendations to the board of directors regarding the company’s investment policies, hedging policy and other banking related matters.

Internal auditor

 

Under the Companies Law, the board of directors of a public company must appoint an internal auditor based on the recommendation of the audit committee. Under the Companies Law, Eacheach of the following may not be appointed as internal auditor:

 

a person (or a relative of a person) who holds more than 5% of the company’s outstanding shares or voting rights;

 

a person (or a relative of a person) who has the power to appoint a director or the general manager of the company;

 

an office holder (including a director) of the company (or a relative thereof); or

 

a member of the company’s independent accounting firm, or anyone on his or her behalf.

 

The role of the internal auditor is, among other things, to examine whether a company’s actions comply with applicable law and orderly business procedure. The audit committee is required to oversee the activities and to assess the performance of the internal auditor as well as to review the internal auditor’s work plan. Our internal auditor is Hila Bar of Brightman Almagor Zohar & Co., a member of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu.Daniel Spira, Certified Public Accountant (Isr.).

 

Fiduciary duties and approval of specified related party transactions and compensation under Israeli law

 

Fiduciary duties of office holders

 

The Companies Law imposes a fiduciary duties on all office holders of a company comprised of a duty of care and a duty of loyalty.

 

The duty of care requires an office holder to act in the same degree of proficiency with which a reasonable office holder in the same position would have acted under the same circumstances. The duty of care includes, among other things, a duty to use reasonable means, in light of the circumstances, to obtain:

 

information on the business advisability of a given action brought for his or her approval or performed by virtue of his or her position; and

 

all other important information pertaining to such action.

73

 

The duty of loyalty requires an office holder to act in good faith and for the benefit of the company, and includes, among other things, the duty to:

 

refrain from any act involving a conflict of interest between the performance of his or her duties in the company and his or her other duties or personal affairs;

 

refrain from any activity that is competitive with the business of the company;

 

refrain from exploiting any business opportunity of the company for the purpose of gaining a personal advantage for himself or herself or others; and

 

disclose to the company any information or documents relating to the company’s affairs which the office holder received as a result of his or her position as an office holder.

 

WeUnder the Companies Law, we may approve an act specified above, provided that the office holder acted in good faith, the act or its approval does not harm the company’s best interest, and the office holder discloses his or her personal interest a sufficient time before the approval of such act, including any relevant document.

 

Disclosure of personal interests of an office holder and approval of transactions

 

The Companies Law requires that an office holder promptly disclose to the company any personal interest that he or she may have and all related material information or documents relating to any existing or proposed transaction by the company. An interested office holder’s disclosure must be made promptly and, in any event, no later than the first meeting of the board of directors at which the transaction is considered. Under the Companies Law, once an office holder complies with the above disclosure requirement, the board of directors at which the transaction is considered. An office holder is not obliged to disclose such information if the personal interest of the office holder derives solely from the personal interest of his or her relative in a transaction that is not considered an extraordinary transaction.

 


Under the Companies Law, a company may approve a transaction between the company and the office holder or a third party in which the office holder has a personal interest only if the office holder has complied with the above disclosure requirement, provided, however, that a company may not approve a transaction or action that is not to the company’s benefit.

 

Under the Companies Law, unless the articles of association of a company provide otherwise, a transaction with an office holder or with a third party in which the office holder has a personal interest, which is not an extraordinary transaction, requires approval by the board of directors. Our articles of association do not state otherwise. If the transaction considered with an office holder or third party in which the office holder has a personal interest is an extraordinary transaction, then the audit committee’s approval is required prior to approval by the board of directors. For the approval of compensation arrangements with directors and executive officers, see “Item 6.Directors, Senior Management and Employees —C. Board Practices—Compensation of directors and executive officers.”

 

Any person who has a personal interest in the approval of a transaction that is brought before a meeting of the board of directors or the audit committee may not be present at the meeting or vote on the matter. However, if the chairperson of the board of directors or the chairperson of the audit committee has determined that the presence of an office holder with a personal interest is required, such office holder may be present at the meeting for the purpose of presenting the matter. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a director who has a personal interest may be present at the meeting and vote on the matter if a majority of the directors or members of the audit committee have a personal interest in the approval of such transaction’ provided, however, that if a majority of the directors at a board of directors meeting have a personal interest in the approval of the transaction, such transaction also requires the approval of the shareholders of the company.

74

 

A “personal interest” is defined under the Companies Law as the personal interest of a person in an action or in a transaction of the company, including the personal interest of such person’s relative or the interest of any other corporate body in which such person and/or such person’s relative is a director or general manager, a 5% shareholder or holds 5% or more of the voting rights, or has the right to appoint at least one director or the general manager, but excluding a personal interest stemming solely from the fact of holding shares in the company. A personal interest also includes (1) a personal interest of a person who votes according to a proxy of another person, including in the event that the other person has no personal interest, and (2) a personal interest of a person who gave a proxy to another person to vote on his or her behalf regardless of whether the discretion of how to vote lies with the person voting or not.

 

An “extraordinary transaction” is defined under the Companies Law as any of the following:

 

a transaction other than in the ordinary course of business;

 

a transaction that is not on market terms; or

 

a transaction that may have a material impact on the company’s profitability, assets or liabilities.

 

An extraordinary transaction in which an office holder has a personal interest requires approval of the company’s audit committee followed by the approval of the board of directors.

 


Disclosure of personal interests of a controlling shareholder and approval of transactions

 

The Companies Law also requires that a controlling shareholder promptly disclose to the company any personal interest that he or she may have and all related material information or documents relating to any existing or proposed transaction by the company. A controlling shareholder’s disclosure must be made promptly and, in any event, no later than the first meeting of the board of directors at which the transaction is considered. The following require the approval of each of (i) the audit committee (or the compensation committee with respect to the terms of engagement of the controlling shareholder or relative thereof with the company related for the provision of service, including among others as an office holder or employee of the company), (ii) the board of directors and (iii) the shareholders (in that order): (a) extraordinary transactions with a controlling shareholder or in which a controlling shareholder has a personal interest (including a private placement in which a controlling shareholder has a personal interest), (b) the engagement with a controlling shareholder or his or her relative, directly or indirectly, for the provision of services to the company, (c) the terms of engagement and compensation of a controlling shareholder or his or her relative as an office holder, and (d) the employment of a controlling shareholder or his or her relative by the company, other than as an office holder (collectively referred as Transaction with a Controlling Shareholder). In addition, the shareholder approval must fulfill one of the following requirements:

 

at least a majority of the shares held by shareholders who have no personal interest in the transaction and are voting at the meeting must be voted in favor of approving the transaction, excluding abstentions; or

the shares voted by shareholders who have no personal interest in the transaction who vote against the transaction represent no more than two percent (2%) of the voting rights in the company.

 

In addition, any extraordinary transaction with a controlling shareholder or in which a controlling shareholder has a personal interest with a term of more than three years requires the abovementioned approval every three years, however, unless, with respect to certain transactions the audit committee determines that such longer term is reasonable under the circumstances.

 

Pursuant to regulations promulgated under the Companies Law, certain transactions with a controlling shareholder, a relative thereof, or with a director, that would otherwise require approval of a company’s shareholders may be exempt from shareholder approval upon certain determinations of the audit committee and board of directors.

 

The Companies Law requires that every shareholder that participates, in person, by proxy or by voting instrument, in a vote regarding a transaction with a controlling shareholder, must indicate in advance or in the ballot whether or not that shareholder has a personal interest in the vote in question. Failure to so indicate will result in the invalidation of that shareholder’s vote.

 

75

Disclosure of Compensation of Executive Officers

For so long as we qualify as a foreign private issuer, we are not required to comply with the proxy rules applicable to U.S. domestic companies, including the requirement applicable to emerging growth companies to disclose the compensation of our chief executive officer and other two most highly compensated executive officers on an individual, rather than an aggregate, basis. Under the Companies Law and the regulations promulgated thereunder we are required to disclose the annual compensation of our five most highly compensated office holders on an individual basis, rather than on an aggregate basis. This disclosure will not be as extensive as that required of a U.S. domestic issuer. As of the date of this annual report we only employ four office holders.

Approval of the compensation of directors and executive officers

 

The compensation of, or an undertaking to indemnify, insure or exculpate, an office holder who is not a director requires the approval of the company’s compensation committee, followed by the approval of the company’s board of directors, and, if such compensation arrangement or an undertaking to indemnify or insure is inconsistent with the company’s stated compensation policy, or if the said office holder is the chief executive officer of the company (apart from a number of specific exceptions), then such arrangement is subject to the approval of our shareholders, subject to the Compensation Special Majority Requirement.

 

Directors. Under the Companies Law, the compensation of our directors requires the approval of our compensation committee, the subsequent approval of the board of directors and, unless exempted under the regulations promulgated under the Companies Law, the approval of the general meeting of our shareholders. If the compensation of our directors is inconsistent with our stated compensation policy, then, provided that those provisions that must be included in the compensation policy according to the Companies Law have been considered by the compensation committee and board of directors, shareholder approval will also be required to be approved by the Compensation Special Majority Requirement.

 

Executive officers other than the chief executive officer. The Companies Law requires the approval of the compensation of a public company’s executive officers (other than the chief executive officer) in the following order: (i) the compensation committee, (ii) the company’s board of directors, and (iii) if such compensation arrangement is inconsistent with the company’s stated compensation policy, the company’s shareholders by the Compensation Special Majority Requirement. However, if the shareholders of the company do not approve a compensation arrangement with an executive officer that is inconsistent with the company’s stated compensation policy, the compensation committee and board of directors may override the shareholders’ decision if each of the compensation committee and the board of directors provide detailed reasons for their decision.

 


Chief executive officer. Under the Companies Law, the compensation of a public company’s chief executive officer is required to be approved by: (i) the company’s compensation committee; (ii) the company’s board of directors, and (iii) the company’s shareholders by the Compensation Special Majority Requirement. However, if the shareholders of the company do not approve the compensation arrangement with the chief executive officer, the compensation committee and board of directors may override the shareholders’ decision if each of the compensation committee and the board of directors provide a detailed reasoning for their decision. The approval of each of the compensation committee and the board of directors must be in accordance with the company’s stated compensation policy; however, under special circumstances, the compensation committee and the board of directors may approve compensation terms of a chief executive officer that are inconsistent with the company’s compensation policy provided that they have considered those provisions that must be included in the compensation policy according to the Companies Law and that shareholder approval was obtained by the Compensation Special Majority Requirement. In addition, the compensation committee may resolve that the shareholder approval is not required for the approval of the engagement terms of a candidate to serve as the chief executive officer, if the compensation committee determines that the compensation arrangement is consistent with the company’s stated compensation policy, that the chief executive officer did not have a prior business relationship with the company or a controlling shareholder of the company, and that subjecting the approval to a shareholder vote would impede the company’s ability to attain the candidate to serve as the company’s chief executive officer.

 

76

Duties of shareholders

 

Under the Companies Law, a shareholder has a duty to refrain from abusing its power in the company and to act in good faith and in an acceptable manner in exercising its rights and performing its obligations to the company and other shareholders, including, among other things, when voting at meetings of shareholders on the following matters:

 

an amendment to the articles of association;

 

an increase in the company’s authorized share capital;

 

a merger; and

 

the approval of related party transactions and acts of office holders that require shareholder approval.

 

A shareholder also has a general duty to refrain from discriminating against other shareholders.

 

The remedies generally available upon a breach of contract will also apply to a breach of the shareholder duties mentioned above, and in the event of discrimination against other shareholders, additional remedies are available to the injured shareholder.

 

In addition, any controlling shareholder, any shareholder that knows that its vote can determine the outcome of a shareholder vote and any shareholder that, under a company’s articles of association, has the power to appoint or prevent the appointment of an office holder, or any other power with respect to a company, is under a duty to act with fairness towards the company. The Companies Law does not describe the substance of this duty except to state that the remedies generally available upon a breach of contract will also apply in the event of a breach of the duty to act with fairness, taking each shareholder’s position in the company into account.

 

Approval of private placements

 

Under the Companies Law and the regulations promulgated thereunder, a private placement of securities does not require approval at a general meeting of the shareholders of a company; provided however, that in special circumstances, such as a private placement completed in lieu of a special tender offer (See “Item 10. Additional Information —Memorandum and Articles of Association—Acquisitions under Israeli law”) or a private placement which qualifies as a related party transaction (See “Item 6.Directors, Senior Management and Employees —C. Board Practices—Fiduciary duties and approval of specified related party transactions and compensation under Israeli law”), for which approval at a general meeting of the shareholders of a company is required.

 


Exemption, Insurance and Indemnification of Directors and Officers

 

Under the Companies Law, a company may not exculpate an office holder from liability for a breach of a fiduciary duty. An Israeli company may exculpate an office holder in advance from liability to the company, in whole or in part, for damages caused to the company as a result of a breach of duty of care but only if a provision authorizing such exculpation is included in its articles of association. Our articles of association include such a provision. The company may not exculpate in advance a director from liability arising out of a prohibited dividend or distribution to shareholders.

 

Under the Companies Law and the Securities Law, 5738-1968, or the Securities Law, a company may indemnify an office holder in respect of the following liabilities, payments and expenses incurred for acts performed by him or her as an office holder, either in advance of an event or following an event, provided its articles of association include a provision authorizing such indemnification:

 

a monetary liability incurred by or imposed on the office holder in favor of another person pursuant to a court judgment, including pursuant to a settlement confirmed as judgment or arbitrator’s decision approved by a competent court. However, if an undertaking to indemnify an office holder with respect to such liability is provided in advance, then such an undertaking must be limited to events which, in the opinion of the board of directors, can be foreseen based on the company’s activities when the undertaking to indemnify is given, and to an amount or according to criteria determined by the board of directors as reasonable under the circumstances, and such undertaking shallwill detail the abovementioned foreseen events and amount or criteria;

 

 77

reasonable litigation expenses, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, which were incurred by the office holder as a result of an investigation or proceeding filed against the office holder by an authority authorized to conduct such investigation or proceeding, provided that such investigation or proceeding was either (i) concluded without the filing of an indictment against such office holder and without the imposition on him of any monetary obligation in lieu of a criminal proceeding; (ii) concluded without the filing of an indictment against the office holder but with the imposition of a monetary obligation on the office holder in lieu of criminal proceedings for an offense that does not require proof of criminal intent; or (iii) in connection with a monetary sanction;

 

reasonable litigation expenses, including attorneys’ fees, incurred by the office holder or which were imposed on the office holder by a court (i) in a proceeding instituted against him or her by the company, on its behalf, or by a third party, (ii) in connection with criminal indictment of which the office holder was acquitted, or (iii) in a criminal indictment which the office holder was convicted of an offense that does not require proof of criminal intent;

 

a monetary liability imposed on the office holder in favor of a payment for a breach offended at an Administrative Procedure (as defined below) as set forth in Section 52(54)(a)(1)(a) to the Securities Law;

 

expenses expendedincurred by thean office holder or certain compensation payments made to an injured party that were instituted against an office holder in connection with respect to an Administrative Procedure under the Securities Law, including reasonable litigation expenses and reasonable attorneys’ fees; and

 

any other obligation or expense in respect of which it is permitted or will be permitted under applicable law to indemnify an office holder, including, without limitation, matters referenced in Section 56H(b)(1) of the Securities Law.

  

An “Administrative Procedure” is defined as a procedure pursuant to chapters H3 (Monetary Sanction by the Israeli Securities Authority), H4 (Administrative Enforcement Procedures of the Administrative Enforcement Committee) or I1 (Arrangement to prevent Procedures or Interruption of procedures subject to conditions) to the Securities Law.

 


Under the Companies Law and the Securities Law, a company may insure an office holder against the following liabilities incurred for acts performed by him or her as an office holder if and to the extent provided in the company’s articles of association:

 

a breach of a fiduciary duty to the company, provided that the office holder acted in good faith and had a reasonable basis to believe that the act would not harm the company;

 

a breach of duty of care to the company or to a third party, to the extent such a breach arises out of the negligent conduct of the office holder;

 

a monetary liability imposed on the office holder in favor of a third party;

 

a monetary liability imposed on the office holder in favor of an injured party at an Administrative Procedure pursuant to Section 52(54)(a)(1)(a) of the Securities Law; and

 

expenses incurred by an office holder in connection with an Administrative Procedure, including reasonable litigation expenses and reasonable attorneys’ fees.

 

78

Under the Companies Law, a company may not indemnify, exculpate or insure an office holder against any of the following:

 

a breach of fiduciary duty, except for indemnification and insurance for a breach of the fiduciary duty to the company to the extent that the office holder acted in good faith and had a reasonable basis to believe that the act would not prejudice the company;

 

a breach of duty of care committed intentionally or recklessly, excluding a breach arising out of the negligent conduct of the office holder;

 

an act or omission committed with intent to derive illegal personal benefit; or

 

a civil or administrative fine, monetary sanction or forfeit levied against the office holder.

 

Under the Companies Law, exculpation, indemnification and insurance of office holders must be approved by the compensation committee and the board of directors and, with respect to directors or controlling shareholders, their relatives and third parties in which such controlling shareholders have a personal interest, also by the shareholders.

 

Our articles of association permit us to exculpate, indemnify and insure our office holders to the fullest extent permitted or to be permitted by law. Our office holders are currently covered bycompensation committee, the board of directors and our shareholders have approved on March 6, 2019, March 28, 2019 and July 25, 2019, respectively, a new directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policy.

 

Employment and consulting agreements with executive officers

 

We have entered into written employment or service agreements with each of our executive officers. See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions— B. Related Party Transactions – Employment Agreements” for additional information.

 

Directors’ service contracts

 

There are no arrangements or understandings between us, on the one hand, and any of our directors, on the other hand, providing for benefits upon termination of their employment or service as directors of our company.

 


D.Employees

 

Number of Employees

 

As of December 31, 2017,2019, we employed 27 employees:2620 employees in Israel and one, our Chief Executive Officer, in the United Statesincluding those employed by our U.S.indirect subsidiary Medigus USA LLC.ScoutCam Ltd.

 

79

TableAs of ContentsApril 15, 2020, we employed 3 employees and CEO as consultant in Israel.

 

Distribution of Employees

 

The following is the distribution of our employees (including those employed by our subsidiary)indirect subsidiary ScoutCam Ltd.) by areas of engagement and geographic location:

 

 As of December 31,  As of December 31, 
 2017  2016  2015  2019  2018  2017 
Numbers of employees by category of activity              
Management and administrative  6   9   9   4   6   6 
Research and development  6   8   12   4   6   6 
Operations  6   8   13   6   6   6 
Sales and marketing  3   2   9   1   3   3 
Production  6   8   12   5   6   6 
Total workforce  27   35   55   20   27   27 
                        
Numbers of employees by geographic location                        
Israel  26   34   47   20   26   26 
Europe  -   -   1 
United States  1   1   7   -   1   1 
Total workforce  27   35   55   20   27   27 
            
Numbers of employees by employer            
Medigus Ltd.  3   26   26 
Medigus LLC.  -   1   1 
ScoutCam Ltd.  17   -   - 
  20   27   27 

 

During the years covered by the above table, we did not employ a significant number of temporary employees. We consider our relations with our employees excellent and have never experienced a labor dispute, strike or work stoppage. None of our employees is represented by a labor union.

 

In Israel we are subject to certain labor statutes and national labor court precedent rulings, as well as to certain provisions of the collective bargaining agreements between the Histadrut (General Federation of Labor in Israel) and the Coordination Bureau of Economic Organizations including the Industrialists’ Associations. These provisions of collective bargaining agreements are applicable to our Israeli employees by virtue of extension orders issued in accordance with relevant labor laws by the Israeli Ministry of Economy and Industry, and which apply such agreement provisions to our employees even though they are not directly part of a union that has signed a collective bargaining agreement. The laws and labor court rulings that apply to our employees principally concern the minimum wage laws, length of the work day and workweek, overtime payment, procedures for dismissing employees, determination of severance pay, leaves of absence (such as annual vacation or maternity leave), sick pay and other conditions for employment. The extension orders which apply to our employees principally concern mandatory contributions to a pension fund or managers’ insurance, annual recreation allowance, travel expenses payment and other conditions of employment. We generally provide our employees with benefits and working conditions beyond the required minimums.

 

Israeli law generally requires severance pay, which may be funded by allocating payments to a managers’ insurance and/or a pension fund described below, upon the retirement or death of an employee or termination of employment without cause (as defined in the law). The payments to the managers’ insurance and/or pension fund in respect of severance pay amount to approximately 8.33% of an employee’s wages, in the aggregate. Furthermore, Israeli employees and employers are required to pay predetermined sums to the National Insurance Institute, which is similar to the United States Social Security Administration. Such amounts also include payments for national health insurance.

 

The employees of U.S. Subsidiary are subject to local labor laws and regulations in the United States.


E.Share Ownership

 

Share ownership by Directors and Executive Officers

 

For information regarding ownership of our ordinary shares by our directors and executive officers, see Item 7.A “Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions ― Major Shareholders”.Shareholders.”

 

Share Option Plans

All of our option plans are administered by our board of directors. Upon the expiration of the plans, no further grants may be made there under, although any existing awards will continue in full force in accordance with the terms under which they were granted. Options granted under any of the plans which are currently outstanding generally may not expire later than six years from the date of grant, unless otherwise specified. Unvested awards that are cancelled and/or forfeited go back into the respective plan.

80

2013 Share Option and Incentive Plan

 

In August 2013, our board of directors approved and adopted our 2013 Share Option and Incentive Plan, or the 2013 Plan, which expires in August 2023. The 2013 Plan provides for the issuance of shares and the granting of options, restricted shares, restricted share units and other share-based awards to employees, directors, officers, consultants, advisors, and service providers of us and ourMedigus U.S. Subsidiary. The Plan provides for awards to be issued at the determination of our board of directors in accordance with applicable law.

As of MarchApril 15, 2018,2020, there were 4,112,2004,276,380 ordinary shares reserved under the 2013 Plan and 12,587,8002,723,620 ordinary shares issuable upon the exercise of awards issued under the 2013 Plan:

 

Plan Number of options outstanding – March 15, 2018 exercise price per one ordinary share (NIS) Number of shares issuable upon the exercise Expiration date
Series C 3,850,000 8.3 385,000 September 30, 2018
Series D 1,640,000 5.37 164,000 July 17, 2020
Series F 408,800 2.05 408,800 December 29, 2021
Series K 11,630,000 0.162 11,630,000 October 17, 2023
Grant date Number of options outstanding – April 15,
2020
  exercise price per one ordinary share (NIS)  Number of shares issuable upon the exercise  Expiration
date
July 2014  880,000   53.7   8,800  July 17, 2020
December 2015  170,800   20.5   17,080  December 29, 2021
October 2017  4,380,000   1.62   438,000  October 17, 2023
January 2019  2,562,500   0.59   2,562,500  January 4, 2025
July 2019  1,250,000   0.59   1,250,000  July 1, 2025

 

The 2013 Plan provides for the grant to residents of Israel of options that qualify under the provisions of Section 102 of the Israeli Income Tax Ordinance (New Version) 1961, as well as for the grant of options that do not qualify under such provisions. The 2013 Plan was submitted to the ITA, as required by applicable law. The 2013 Plan also provides for the grant of options to U.S. resident employees that are “qualified”, i.e., incentive stock options, under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, and options that are not qualified. In addition to the grant of awards under the relevant tax regimes of the United States and Israel, the 2013 Plan allows for the grant of awards to grantees in other jurisdictions, with respect to which our board of directors is empowered to make the requisite adjustments in the plan.

Series B Option Plan

In February 2012, we adopted our Series B Option Plan. Our directors, officers, employees and certain consultants and dealers were eligible to participate in this plan. As of March 15, 2018, there were 68,000 ordinary shares issuable upon the exercise of outstanding optionsOptions granted under the plan. These options have an expiration date of April 23, 2018. No additional options will be issued under this plan. Israeli grantees who were directors, officers and employees could be granted options under the plan that would qualify for special tax treatment under the Capital Gains Route. This plan was submitted to the ITA as required by applicable law. The exercise price for the Series B Options is NIS 6.8 per share, linked to the consumer price index as of February 6 of each calendar year following the grant of the Series B Options, compared to the known consumer price index as of February 6 of the previous calendar year or as ofPlan which are currently outstanding generally may not expire later than six years from the date of grant. Ifgrant, unless otherwise specified. Unvested awards that are cancelled and/or forfeited go back into the rate of increase of the consumer price index is higher than 3%, the exercise price is increased by the difference between 3% and the rate of increase of the consumer price index.plan.

 

Series A Option Plan

In August 2011, we adopted our Series A Option Plan. Our directors, officers, employees and certain consultants and dealers were eligible to participate in this plan. As of March 15, 2018, there were 10,000 ordinary shares issuable upon the exercise of outstanding options under the plan. These options have an expiration date of April 23, 2018. No additional options will be issued under this plan. Israeli grantees who were directors, officers and employees could be granted options under the plan that would qualify for special tax treatment in Israel. This plan was submitted to the ITA, as required by applicable law. The exercise price for the Series A Options is NIS 9.1per share, linked to the consumer price index as of August 1 of each calendar year following the grant of the Series A Options, compared to the known consumer price index as of August 1 of the previous calendar year or as of the date of grant. If the rate of increase of the consumer price index is higher than 3%, the exercise price is increased by the difference between 3% and the rate of increase of the consumer price index. 

ITEM 7.MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

        

A.Major Shareholders

 

The following table sets forth information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our ordinary shares as of MarchApril 15, 20182020 (unless otherwise noted below), the beneficial ownership of our ordinary shares by:

 

each of our directors and executive officers individually; and

 

all of our executive officers and directors as a group.

 

81

As of March 15, 2018, there was no person or entity known by us to own 5% or more of our outstanding ordinary shares.

The beneficial ownership of our ordinary shares is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC. Under these rules, a person is deemed to be a beneficial owner of a security if that person has or shares voting power, which includes the power to vote or to direct the voting of the security, or investment power, which includes the power to dispose of or to direct the disposition of the security. For purposes of the table below, we deem ordinary shares issuable pursuant to options that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days as of March April 15, 2018,2020, if any, to be outstanding and to be beneficially owned by the person holding the options or warrants for the purposes of computing the percentage ownership of that person, but we do not treat them as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. The percentage of ordinary shares beneficially owned is based on 191,785,78482,598,738 ordinary shares outstanding as of MarchApril 15, 2018.2020.

 

Except where otherwise indicated, we believe, based on information furnished to us by such owners, that the beneficial owners of the ordinary shares listed below have sole investment and voting power with respect to such shares. In addition, none of our shareholders will have different voting rights from other shareholders. To the best of our knowledge, we are not owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by another corporation or by any foreign government. We are not aware of any arrangement that may, at a subsequent date, result in a change of control of our company.

 

As of MarchApril 15, 2018,2020, there was one shareholder of record of our ordinary shares, which was located in Israel. The number of record holders is not representative of the number of beneficial holders of our ordinary shares, as the shares of all shareholders for a publicly traded company such as ours which is listed on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange are recorded in the name of our Israeli share registrar, Bank Hapoalim Registration Company Ltd.

 

Unless otherwise noted below, each beneficial owner’s address is Medigus Ltd., Omer Industrial Park, No. 7A, P.O. Box 3030, Omer 8496500, Israel.

 

Our principal shareholders do not have different or special voting rights.

 

Name of Beneficial OwnerNumber of Shares Beneficially OwnedPercentage of Shares Beneficially Owned
Directors and executive officers
Christopher (Chris) Rowland* *
Oded Yatzkan* *
Minelu (Menashe) Sonnenschein**
Yaron Silberman* *
Amir Govrin**
Doron Birger* *
Eitan Machover**
Efrat Venkert**
Yuval Yanai--
All directors and executive officers as a group (nine persons)(1)1,438,349*%
Name of Beneficial Owner Number of Shares Beneficially Owned  Percentage of Shares Beneficially Owned 
Principal Shareholders      
Algomizer Ltd.(1)  13,333,336   14.94%
Kfir Zilberman(2)  6,757,920   8.04%
         
Directors and executive officers        
Kineret Tzedef  -   - 
Liron Carmel  *   * 
Ronen Rosenbloom  *   * 
Eliyahu Yoresh  *   * 
Eli Cohen  *   * 
Tatiana Yosef  *    * 
         
All directors and executive officers as a group (six persons)(3)  1,648,064   1.96%

 

*less than 1%. 
  
(1)Based solely upon, and qualified in its entirety by reference to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on April 13, 2020, by Algomizer Ltd. Includes (i) 6,666,668 ordinary shares underlying 333,334 ADSs held by Algomizer Ltd.; (ii) 6,666,668 ordinary shares underlying warrants to purchase 333,334 ADSs held by Algomizer Ltd.  
(2)Based solely upon, and qualified in its entirety with reference to, Schedule 13D/A filed with the SEC on September 25, 2018, by Kfir Zilberman and L.I.A. Pure Capital Ltd. Includes (i) 670,000 ordinary shares held by L.I.A Pure Capital Ltd., (ii) 4,433,920 ordinary shares underlying 221,696 ADSs held by L.I.A Pure Capital Ltd., (iii) 154,000 ordinary shares underlying 7,700 ADSs held by Kfir Silberman Ltd., and (iv) 1,500,000 ordinary shares underlying 75,000 Series C Warrants held by L.I.A. Pure Capital. Kfir Zilberman is the controlling person of L.I.A. Pure Capital. The address of Mr. Zilberman and L.I.A. Pure Capital Ltd. is 20 Raoul Wallenberg Street, Tel Aviv, Israel 6971916. 
(3)Consists of 613,099196,614 ordinary shares and options to purchase 825,2501,451,450 ordinary shares currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days as of MarchApril 15, 2018.2020.

 

82

Significant Changes in Percentage Ownership by Major Shareholders

 

To our knowledge, the significant changes in the percentage of ownership held by our major shareholders during the past three years have been: (i) the increase in the percentage of ownership held by Orbimed Israel GP Ltd. above 5% as of 2013 and 2014, and the decrease in the percentage of ownership in 2015, 2016 and in 2017; (ii) the increase in the percentage of ownership held by Migdal Insurance & Financial Holdings Ltd. above 5% as of 2014 and the decrease in the percentage of ownership in 2015, 2016 and in 2017 below 5%; (iii) the increase in the percentage of ownership held by Senvest Management LLC above 5% as of 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016, and the decrease in the percentage of ownership in 2017 below 5%; (iv) the increase in the percentage of ownership held by Oren Dan above 5% as of 2012, and the decrease in the percentage of ownership in 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017 below 5%; (v) the increase in the percentage of ownership held by Armistice Capital Master Fund Ltd. above 5% as of 2014, and the decrease in the percentage of ownership in 2015, 2016 and 2017 below 5%; (vi) the increase in the percentage of ownership held by Sabby Healthcare Master Fund Ltd. and Sabby Volatility Warrant Master Fund, Ltd. above 5% as of 2016, 2017 and 2017,2018, and the decrease in the percentage of ownership in 2018 below 5%; and (vii) the increase in the percentage of ownership held by Empery Asset Management LP above 5% as of 2016 and 2017, and the decrease in the percentage of ownership in 2018 below 5%.; (viii) the increase in the percentage of ownership held by L.I.A. Pure Capital Ltd. above 5% as of 2018; and (ix) the increase in the percentage of ownership held by Algomizer Ltd. above 5% as of 2019.

 

B.Related Party Transactions

 

Employment Agreements

 

We have entered into written employment agreements with each of our executive officers. All of these agreements contain customary provisions regarding non-competition, confidentiality of information and assignment of inventions. However, the enforceability of the non-competition provisions may be limited under applicable law. In addition, we have entered into agreements with each executive officer and director pursuant to which we have agreed to indemnify each of them to the fullest extent permitted by law to the extent that these liabilities are not covered by directors and officers insurance.

 

Our office holders are generally eligible for bonuses each year. The bonuses are established and granted in accordance with our compensation policy and, and are generally payable upon meeting objectives and targets that are approved by our compensation committee and board of directors (and if required by our shareholders).

 

Directors and Officers Insurance Policy and Indemnification Agreements

 

Our articles of association permit us to exculpate, indemnify and insure our directors and officeholders to the fullest extent permitted by the Companies Law.

 

We have entered into agreements with each of our current director and officers exculpating them from a breach of their duty of care to us to the fullest extent permitted by law, subject to limited exceptions, and undertaking to indemnify them to the fullest extent permitted by law, to the extent that these liabilities are not covered by insurance. This indemnification is limited, with respect to any monetary liability imposed in favor of a third party, to events determined as foreseeable by the board of directors based on our activities. The maximum aggregate amount of indemnification that we may pay to our directors and officers based on such indemnification agreement is equal to 25% of our shareholders’ equity pursuant to our latest audited or unaudited consolidated financial statements, as applicable, as of the date of the indemnification payment. Such indemnification amounts are in addition to any insurance amounts. Each director or officer who agrees to receive this letter of indemnification also gives his approval to the termination of all previous letters of indemnification that we have provided to him or her in the past, if any.

 


We currently haveOur compensation committee approved on December 23, 2019, a new directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policy. The new directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policy providing total coverage of $12$8 million for the benefit of all of our directors and officers, in respect of which we are charged a twelve-month premium of $80,000,$410,000, and which includes a deductible of up to $50,000$250,000 per claim, other than securities related claims filed in the United States or Canada, for which the deductible shallwill not exceed $350,000.$1,500,000. The aforementioned policy covers us as well as ScoutCam Inc. with the premium costs allocated between Medigus and ScoutCam Inc.

  

In addition, at general meeting of our shareholders held on December 29, 2015,July 25, 2019, our shareholders approved our compensation policy, which determines, among others, that we may provide our directors and officers, including those serving in any of our subsidiaries from time or time and those who are controlling shareholders, with liability insurance policies provided that the engagement is in the ordinary course of business, in market terms and is not expected to materially influence our profits, properties and undertakings. The coverage limit shall beis of up to $20$30 million per occurrence and for the insurance period (additional coverage for legal expenses not included), provided that the annual premium shallwill not exceed $80,000$500,000 and that the deductible (except for extraordinary matters as prescribed in the insurance policy, such as lawsuits against the Company pursuant to securities laws and/or lawsuits to be filed in the US/Canada) shallwill not exceed $50,000$1,000,000 per occurrence.

 

83

TableMedigus and ScoutCam Ltd. entered into an Intercompany Services Agreement, as of ContentsMay 30, 2019 providing for provision of services by Medigus to ScoutCam Ltd. On April 19, 2020, Medigus and ScoutCam Ltd. amended and rested the agreement such that ScoutCam Ltd. shall provide Medigus with services, including usage of ScoutCam Ltd. office space in consideration for a fee determined based on the actual usage by Medigus.

On December 1, 2019, Medigus and ScoutCam Ltd. (ScoutCam) consummated a certain Amended and Restated Asset Transfer Agreement, effective March 1, 2019, which transferred and assigned certain assets and intellectual property rights related to its miniaturized imaging business (A&R Transfer Agreement), and a patent license. Under the A&R Transfer Agreement, we transferred two patent families in exchange for a license in connection with the marketing and sale of the Medigus Ultrasonic Surgical Endostapler. In addition, we granted to ScoutCam a license to access, use, improve, develop, market and sell licensed intellectual property, including the right to any future versions, enhancements, improvements and derivative works of such licensed intellectual property in connection with the development and commercialization of the ScoutCam miniature video technology.

On May 1, 2019, we entered into a consulting agreement with L.I.A Pure Capital Ltd. or Pure Capital, a company owned by Kfir Zilberman for the provision of business development and strategic consulting services, including ongoing consulting to the company, its management and its chief executive officer in the fields of M&A and investment activities. In consideration for its services, Pure Capital is entitled to a monthly fee of NIS 40,000 (approximately $11,500), a finder’s fee of 5% of any investment of equity or debt introduced by him to the company and reimbursement of expenses of up to $1,000 per month. In connection with the transaction between Medigus and Algomizer, Pure Capital received a finder’s fee of $125,000.

On March 6, 2019, March 28, 2019 and July 25, 2019 our compensation committee, board of directors and shareholders, respectively, have approved to amend, the framework for the liability insurance policy we provide our directors and officers. Under the amendment the coverage limit of the liability insurance policy is of up to $30 million per occurrence and for the insurance period (additional coverage for legal expenses not included), provided that the annual premium will not exceed $500,000.

On April 19, 2020, we entered an Asset Transfer Agreement, effective January 20, 2020, with our majority owned subsidiary GERD IP, Inc. Pursuant to the Asset Transfer Agreement, we transferred certain of our patents in consideration for seven (7) capital notes issued to us by GERD IP, Inc., of $2,000,000 each.

 

C.Interests of Experts and Counsel

 

Not applicable.

 


ITEM 8.FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

A.Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information.

 

See “Item 18. Financial Statements.”

 

Export Sales

 

The following table presents total export sales for each of the fiscal years indicated (USD, in thousands):

  

 For the year ended December 31,  For the year ended December 31, 
 2017  2016  2015  2019  2018  2017 
Total export sales*  445   430   624   242   424   445 
as a percentage of total revenues  95%  78%  100%  89%  97%  95%

 

*Export sales, as presented, are defined as sales to customers located outside of Israel.

Legal Proceedings

 

From time to time we may assert or be subject to various asserted or unasserted legal proceedings and claims. Any such claims, regardless of merit, could be time-consuming and expensive to defend and could divert management’s attention and resources from our operations. While management believes we have adequate insurance coverage and we accrue loss contingencies for all known matters that are probable and can be reasonably estimated, we cannot assure that the outcome of all current or future litigation will not have a material adverse effect on us and our results of operations.

 

On March 30, 2016, a former secretary and internal legal advisor filed a lawsuit against us and our chief executive officer. The lawsuit notes several claims, among which is that the employee was wrongfully terminated. On July 19, 2017,In June 2018, we have entered into a settlementreached an agreement with our former secretary and internal legal advisor in consideration for him dismissing his claims against us.

Followingthe Israeli Tax Authorities, or the ITA agreement, regarding a withholding tax audit conducted by the ITA for the four-year period ended on December 31, 2014, which was disclosed in Israel conductedour annual report on October 6, 2016,Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended 31, 2017. According to the ITA agreement we are deemedrequired to be in debt of approximately NIS 2.7 million (which is approximately $0.8 million based onpay the exchange rate as of March 15, 2018) of additional withholding taxes, including penalties and interest. It is our management’s opinion, based on the assessment of our legal counsel, that the chances for the claims being dismissed are more likely than not.ITA an immaterial amount.

 

Dividends

 

We have never paid cash dividends on our ordinary shares and do not anticipate that we will pay any cash dividends on our ordinary shares or ADSs in the foreseeable future.

 

We intend to retain our earnings to finance the development and expenses of our business. Any future determination relating to our dividend policy will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on a number of factors, including future earnings, our financial condition, operating results, contractual restrictions, capital requirements, business prospects, applicable Israeli law and other factors our board of directors may deem relevant.

 

84

B.Significant Changes

 

No significant change, other than as otherwise described in this annual report, has occurred in our operations since the date of our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report.

 

ITEM 9.THE OFFER AND LISTING

 

A.Offer and Listing Details

 

Our ordinary shares have been trading on the TASE under the symbol “MDGS” since February 2006. The ADSs are listed on the NASDAQNasdaq under the symbol “MDGS” with one ADS representing 5020 ordinary shares.

 

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the reported high and low sale prices of our ordinary shares on the TASE in NIS and U.S. dollars. U.S. dollar per ordinary share amounts are calculated using the U.S. dollar representative rate of exchange on the date for which the high or low market price is applicable, as reported by the Bank of Israel.

  NIS
Price Per
Ordinary Share*
  USD
Price Per
Ordinary Share*
 
  High  Low  High  Low 
Annual:            
             
2018 (until March 15, 2018)  0.12   0.09   0.04   0.03 
2017  0.63   0.09   0.17   0.03 
2016  2.23   0.47   0.58   0.12 
2015  5.89   0.26   0.71   1.48 
2014  6.73   1.50   1.93   0.39 
2013  11.30   5.61   2.99   1.59 
                 
Quarterly:                
                 
First Quarter 2018 (until March 15, 2018)  0.12   0.09   0.04   0.03 
Fourth Quarter 2017  0.17   0.09   0.05   0.03 
Third Quarter 2017  0.19   0.14   0.05   0.04 
Second Quarter 2017  0.26   0.15   0.07   0.04 
First Quarter 2017  0.63   0.23   0.17   0.06 
Fourth Quarter 2016  1.19   0.47   0.31   0.12 
Third Quarter 2016  2.23   0.65   0.58   0.17 
Second Quarter 2016  1.42   0.74   0.38   0.19 
First Quarter 2016  1.87   1.26   0.48   0.32 
                 
Most Recent Six Months:                
                 
March (until March 15, 2018)  0.10   0.09   0.03   0.02 
February 2018  0.10   0.09   0.03   0.03 
January 2018  0.12   0.09   0.04   0.03 
December 2017  0.12   0.09   0.03   0.03 
November 2017  0.16   0.12   0.05   0.03 
October 2017  0.17   0.15   0.05   0.04 
September 2017  0.16   0.14   0.05   0.04 

On March 15, 2018, the last reported sale price of our ordinary shares on the TASE was NIS 0.096 per share, or approximately $0.03 per share (based on the exchange rate reported by the Bank of Israel for such date). On March 15, 2018, the exchange rate of the NIS to the dollar was $1.00 = NIS 3.434 as reported by the Bank of Israel.

85

ADSs

Our ADSs commenced trading on the NASDAQNasdaq under the symbol “MDGS” on August 5, 2015.Each ADS represents 5020 ordinary shares.

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the reported high and low sale prices of the ADSs on the NASDAQ in U.S. dollars. 

  U.S. $ Price Per ADS* 
  High  Low 
Yearly:      
       
2018 (until March 15, 2018)  1.71   1.23 
2017  10.7   1.25 
2016  32.5   5.23 
2015 (commencing August 5, 2015)  51.7   25.1 
         
Quarterly:        
         
First Quarter 2018 (until March 15, 2018)  1.71   1.23 
Fourth Quarter 2017  3.18   1.25 
Third Quarter 2017  2.94   1.84 
Second Quarter 2017  3.35   2.03 
First Quarter 2017  10.7   2.91 
Fourth Quarter 2016  17.8   5.23 
Third Quarter 2016  32.5   7.63 
Second Quarter 2016  19.0   10.1 
First Quarter 2016  26.80   15.0 
         
Most Recent Six Months:        
         
March 2018 (until March 15, 2018)  1.48   1.25 
February 2018  1.50   1.23 
January 2018  1.71   1.32 
December 2017  1.73   1.25 
November 2017  3.18   1.55 
October 2017  2.47   2.13 
September 2017  2.58   1.85 

*price per ADS adjusted to reflect (i) the 10:1 reverse share split and the change in the ratio of ordinary shares per ADS to five deposited ordinary shares per ADS effected on November 6, 2015, and (ii)retroactively thechange in the ratio of ordinary shares per ADS from five deposited ordinary shares per ADS to 50 deposited ordinary shares per ADS effected on March 15, 2017.

On March 15, 2018, the last reported sale price of the ADS on the NASDAQ was $1.39 per ADS.

 

For a description of the ADSs, see “Item 12. Description of Securities Other Than Equity Securities – D. American Depositary Shares.”

 

Our Series C Warrants have been trading on Nasdaq under the symbol “MDGSW” since July 2018. Each Series C Warrant is exercisable into one ADS for an exercise price of $3.50, and will expire five years from the date of issuance.

B.Plan of Distribution

 

Not Applicable.

 

86

C.Markets

 

Our ordinary shares are listed and traded on the TASE. TheADSs, each representing 5020 ordinary share and evidenced by an American depositary receipt, or ADR, are traded on the NASDAQNasdaq under the symbol “MDGS.” The ADRs were issued pursuant to a Depositary Agreement entered into with The Bank of New YorkYork. Our Series C Warrants, each exercisable into one ADS for an exercise price of $3.50, are traded on the Nasdaq under the symbol “MDGSW”.

 

D.Selling Shareholders

 

Not Applicable.

  

E.Dilution

 

Not Applicable.

 

F.Expenses of the Issue

 

Not Applicable.

 

ITEM 10.ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

 

A.Share Capital

 

General

 

Our legal and commercial name is Medigus Ltd. We were incorporated in the State of Israel on December 9, 1999, as a private company pursuant to the Israeli Companies Ordinance (New Version), 1983. In February 2006, we completed our initial public offering in Israel, and ourordinaryshares have since traded on the TASE, under the symbol “MDGS”. In May 2015, we listed our ADSs on NASDAQ,Nasdaq, and since August 2015 our ADSs have been traded on the NASDAQNasdaq under the symbol “MDGS”. Each ADS represents 5020 ordinary shares. In July 2018, we listed our Series C Warrants on the Nasdaq, and since then our Series C Warrants have been traded on Nasdaq under the symbol “MDGSW”. Each Series C Warrant is exercisable into one ADS for an exercise price of $3.50, and will expire five years from the date of issuance.

  

Our authorized share capital consists of 800,000,000250,000,000 ordinary shares, par value NIS 0.101.00 per share. As of MarchApril 15, 2018,2020, we had 191,785,78482,598,738 ordinary shares issued and outstanding. All of our outstanding ordinary shares have been fully paid and non-assessable. Holders of paid-up ordinary shares are entitled to participate equally in the payment of dividends and other distributions and, in the event of liquidation, in all distributions after the discharge of liabilities to creditors.Our ordinary shares are not redeemable.

 

Pursuant to the terms of the securities purchase agreements relating to an offering of our ADSs and warrants which closed on December 6, 2016, we granted the purchasers in such offering an eighteen month contractual preemptive right to participate in future financings, subject to certain exceptions, in an amount equal to up to 50% of the amount raised in such future financings. Other than the preemptive rights described herein, our ordinary shares are not subject to any other preemptive rights.

87

Options

 

Options

As of MarchApril 15, 2018,2020, options to purchase an aggregate of 12,665,8004,276,380 ordinary shares have been granted under our share option plans. See Item 4. Information on the Company - B.BusinessOverview“Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—E. Share Ownership.”Ownership” in this annual report on Form 20-F.

 

87

Warrants

 

As of MarchApril 15, 2018,2020, the following warrants are outstanding:

 

Warrants publicly traded on the TASE to purchase an aggregate of 3,526,250 ordinary shares at an exercise price per ordinary share of NIS 5.32, approximately $1.55. These warrants expire on July 8, 2018;

Unregistered warrants to purchase an aggregate of 3,955990 ADSs at an exercise price per ADS of $14.375.$57.50. These warrants expire on September 8, 2021.

 

Unregistered warrants to purchase an aggregate of 41,86410,469 ADSs at an exercise price per ADS of $9.0.$36. These warrants expire on June 6, 2022.

 

Unregistered warrants to purchase an aggregate of 3,987998 ADSs at an exercise price per ADS of $7.37.$29.48. These warrants expire on December 6, 2021.

   

Warrants to purchase an aggregate of 2,142,858535,730 ADSs at an exercise price per ADS of $14. These warrants expire on March 29, 2022.

Warrants to purchase an aggregate of 37,501 ADSs at an exercise price per ADS of $17.5. These warrants expire on March 29, 2022.

Unregistered warrants to purchase an aggregate of 101,251 ADSs at an exercise price per ADS of $9. These warrants expire on May 27, 2023.

Unregistered warrants to purchase an aggregate of 14,177 ADSs at an exercise price per ADS of $10. These warrants expire on November 24, 2022.
Warrants to purchase an aggregate of 3,263,325 ADSs at an exercise price per ADS of $3.50. These warrants expire on March 29, 2022.July 18, 2023.

WarrantsUnregistered warrants to purchase an aggregate of 150,000198,637 ADSs at an exercise price per ADS of $4.375. These warrants expire on March 29, 2022.July 18, 2023.

Unregistered warrantswarrant to purchase an aggregate of 405,000333,334 ADSs at an exercise price per ADS of $2.25. These warrants expire$4.00. The warrant expires on May 27, 2023.

Unregistered warrants to purchase an aggregate of 56,700 ADSs at an exercise price per ADS of $2.50. These warrants expire on November 24,September 3, 2022.

 

B.Memorandum and Articles of Association

 

Registration NumberA copy of our amended and Purposes of the Company

Our registration number with the Israeli Registrar of Companies is 51-286697-1. Our purpose as set forth in ourrestated articles of association is attached as Exhibit 1.1 to engage in any lawful activity.

Transfer of shares

Our fully paid ordinary shares are issued in registered form and may be freely transferred under our articles of association, unless the transferthis annual report on Form 20-F. The information called for by this Item is restricted or prohibited by another instrument, applicable law or the rules of a stock exchange on which the shares are listed for trade. The ownership or voting of our ordinary shares by non-residents of Israel is not restricted in any way by our articles of association or the laws of the State of Israel, except for ownership by nationals of certain countries that are, or have been, in a state of war with Israel.

Liability to further capital calls

Our board of directors may make, from time to time, such calls as it may deem fit upon shareholders with respect to any sum unpaid with respect to shares held by such shareholders which is not payable at a fixed time. Such shareholder shall pay the amount of every call so made upon him or her.

Election of Directors

Under our articles of association, our board of directors must consist of at least three and not more than 12 directors, not including two external directors appointed as required under the Companies Law. Our board of directors currently consists of five members, none of which are external directors, including our non-executive chairman of the board of directors, which is also appointed by the general meeting of our shareholders. Our directors are elected at the annual general meeting of our shareholders by a simple majority. Because our ordinary shares do not have cumulative voting rights in the election of directors, the holders of a majority of the voting power represented at a shareholders meeting have the power to elect all of our directors. The general meeting of our shareholders may resolve, at any time, by an ordinary majority resolution prior to the termination of his respective term of service and it may appoint another director in his place, provided that the director was given a reasonable opportunity to state his case before the general meeting.

88

In addition, our articles of association allows our board of directors to appoint new directors to fill vacancies on the board of directors to serve until the subsequent annual general meeting of our shareholders, provided, that the number of directors shall not exceed 12 directors. For further information on the election and removal of directors see “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—C. Board Practices.”

Dividend and liquidation rights

We may declare a dividend to be paid to the holders of our ordinary shares in proportion to their respective shareholdings. Under the Companies Law, dividend distributions are determined by the board of directors and do not require the approval of the shareholders of a company unless the company’s articles of association provide otherwise. Our articles of association do not require shareholder approval of a dividend distribution and provide that dividend distributions may be determined by our board of directors.

Pursuant to the Companies Law, the distribution amount is limited to the greater of retained earnings or earnings generated over the previous two years, according to our then last reviewed or audited consolidated financial statements, provided that the date of the financial statements is not more than six months prior to the date of the distribution, or we may distribute dividends that do not meet such criteria only with court approval. In each case, we are only permitted to distribute a dividend if our board of directors and the court, if applicable, determines that there is no reasonable concern that payment of the dividend will prevent us from satisfying our existing and foreseeable obligations as they become due.

In the event of our liquidation, after satisfaction of liabilities to creditors, our assets will be distributed to the holders of our ordinary shares in proportion to their shareholdings. This right, as well as the right to receive dividends, may be affected by the grant of preferential dividend or distribution rights to the holders of a class of shares with preferential rights that may be authorized in the future.

Exchange controls

There are currently no Israeli currency control restrictions on remittances of dividends on our ordinary shares, proceeds from the sale of the shares or interest or other payments to non-residents of Israel, except for shareholders who are subjects of certain countries that are, or have been, in a state of war with Israel.

Shareholder Meetings

Under the Companies Law, we are required to hold an annual general meeting of our shareholders once every calendar year that must be held no later than 15 months after the date of the previous annual general meeting. All general meetings other than the annual meeting of shareholders are referred to in our articles of association as extraordinary meetings. Our board of directors may call extraordinary meetings whenever it sees fit, at such time and place, within or outside of Israel, as it may determine. In addition, the Companies Law provides that our board of directors is required to convene a special meeting upon the written request of (i) any two of our directors or one-quarter of the members of our board of directors or (ii) one or more shareholders holding, in the aggregate, either (a) 5% or more of our outstanding issued shares and 1% or more of our outstanding voting power or (b) 5% or more of our outstanding voting power.

Under the Companies Law, one or more shareholders holding at least 1% of the voting rights at the general meeting may request that the board of directors include a matter in the agenda of a general meeting to be convened in the future, provided that it is appropriate to discuss such a matter at the general meeting.

Subject to the provisions of the Companies Law and the regulations promulgated thereunder, shareholders entitled to participate and vote at general meetings are the shareholders of record on a date to be decided by the board of directors, which may be between four and 40 days prior to the date of the meeting. Furthermore, the Companies Law requires that resolutions regarding the following matters must be passed at a general meeting of our shareholders:

amendments to our articles of association;

appointment or termination of our auditors;

89

appointment of external directors;

approval of certain related party transactions;

increases or reductions of our authorized share capital;

mergers; and

the exercise of our board of directors powers by a general meeting, if our board of directors is unable to exercise its powers and the exercise of any of its powers is required for our proper management.

Under our articles of association, we are not required to give notice to our registered shareholders pursuant to the Companies Law, unless otherwise required by law. The Companies Law requires that a notice of any annual general meeting or extraordinary general meeting be provided to shareholders at least 21 days prior to the meeting and if the agenda of the meeting includes the appointment or removal of directors, the approval of transactions with office holders or interested or related parties, or an approval of a merger, or as otherwise required under applicable law, notice must be provided at least 35 days prior to the meeting.

Voting rights

Voting rights

All our ordinary shares have identical voting and other rights in all respects.

Quorum requirements

Pursuant to our articles of association, holders of our ordinary shares have one vote for each ordinary share held on all matters submitted to a vote before the shareholders at a general meeting. The quorum required for our general meetings of shareholders consists of at least two shareholders, present in person or by proxy, holding at least ten percent (10%) of the voting rights of the Company. A meeting adjourned for lack of a quorum will be adjourned to the same day of the following week at the same time and place, or to such other day, time or place if such is stated in the notice of the meeting. At the reconvened meeting, if a quorum is not present within an half an hour, any number of shareholders present in person or by proxy shall constitute a lawful quorum.

Vote requirements

Our articles of association provide that all resolutions of our shareholders require a simple majority vote, unless otherwise required by the Companies Law or by our articles of association. Under the Companies Law, each of (i) the approval of an extraordinary transaction with a controlling shareholder and (ii) the terms of employment or other engagement of the controlling shareholder of the company or such controlling shareholder’s relative (even if not extraordinary) requires the approval described under “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—C.Board Practices—Fiduciary duties and approval of specified related party transactions and compensation under Israeli law—Disclosure of personal interests of a controlling shareholder and approval of transactions.” Certain transactions with respect to remuneration of our office holders and directors require further approvals described under “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—C. Board Practices—Fiduciary duties and approval of specified related party transactions and compensation under Israeli law—Approval of compensation of directors and executive officers.” Another exception to the simple majority vote requirement is a resolution for the voluntary winding up, or an approval of a scheme of arrangement or reorganization, of the company pursuant to Section 350 of the Companies Law, which requires the approval of the majority of the shareholders voting their shares, other than abstainees, holding at least 75% of the voting rights represented at the meeting, in person, by proxy or by voting deed and voting on the resolution.

90

Access to corporate records

Under the Companies Law, shareholders are provided access to minutes of our general meetings, our shareholders register and principal shareholders register, our articles of association, our financial statements and any document that we are required by law to file publicly with the Israeli Companies Registrar or the Israel Securities Authority. In addition, shareholders may request to be provided with any document related to an action or transaction requiring shareholder approval under the related party transaction provisions of the Companies Law. We may deny this request if we believe it has not been made in good faith or if such denial is necessary to protect our interest or protect a trade secret or patent.

Modification of class rights

Under the Companies Law and our articles of association, the rights attached to any class of shares, such as voting, liquidation and dividend rights, may be amended by adoption of a resolution by the holders of a majority of the shares of that class present at a separate class meeting, or otherwise in accordance with the rights attached to such class of shares, as set forth in our articles of association.

Acquisitions under Israeli law

Full tender offer

A person wishingExhibit 2.5 to acquire shares of an Israeli public companythis annual report on Form 20-F and who would as a result hold over 90% of the target company’s issued and outstanding share capital is requiredincorporated by the Companies Law to make a tender offer to all of the company’s shareholders for the purchase of all of the issued and outstanding shares of the company. A person wishing to acquire shares of a public Israeli company and who would as a result hold over 90% of the issued and outstanding share capital of a certain class of shares is required to make a tender offer to all of the shareholders who hold shares of the relevant class for the purchase of all of the issued and outstanding shares of that class. If the shareholders who do not accept the offer hold less than 5% of the issued and outstanding share capital of the company or of the applicable class, and more than half of the shareholders who do not have a personal interest in the offer accept the offer, all of the shares that the acquirer offered to purchase will be transferred to the acquirer by operation of law. However, a tender offer will also be accepted if the shareholders who do not accept the offer hold less than 2% of the issued and outstanding share capital of the company or of the applicable class of shares.

Upon a successful completion of such a full tender offer, any shareholder that was an offeree in such tender offer, whether such shareholder accepted the tender offer or not, may, within six months from the date of acceptance of the tender offer, petition an Israeli court to determine whether the tender offer was for less than fair value and that the fair value should be paid as determined by the court. However, under certain conditions, the offeror may include in the terms of the tender offer that an offeree who accepted the offer will not be entitled to petition the Israeli court as described above.

If a tender offer is not accepted in accordance with the requirements set forth above, the acquirer may not acquire shares of the company that will increase its holdings to more than 90% of the company’s issued and outstanding share capital or of the applicable class from shareholders who accepted the tender offer.

Special tender offer

The Companies Law provides that an acquisition of shares of an Israeli public company must be made by means of a special tender offer if as a result of the acquisition the purchaser would become a holder of 25% or more of the voting rights in the company. This requirement does not apply if there is already another holder of at least 25% of the voting rights in the company. Similarly, the Companies Law provides that an acquisition of shares in a public company must be made by means of a special tender offer if as a result of the acquisition the purchaser would become a holder of more than 45% of the voting rights in the company, if there is no other shareholder of the company who holds more than 45% of the voting rights in the company, subject to certain exceptions.

91

A special tender offer must be extended to all shareholders of a company but the offeror is not required to purchase shares representing more than 5% of the voting power attached to the company’s outstanding shares, regardless of how many shares are tendered by shareholders. A special tender offer may be consummated only if (i) at least 5% of the voting power attached to the company’s outstanding shares will be acquired by the offeror and (ii) the number of shares tendered in the offer exceeds the number of shares whose holders objected to the offer (excluding the purchaser and its controlling shareholder, holders of 25% or more of the voting rights in the company or any person having a personal interest in the acceptance of the tender offer or any other person actingreference into this annual report on their behalf, including relatives and entities under such person’s control). If a special tender offer is accepted, then the purchaser or any person or entity controlling it or under common control with the purchaser or such controlling person or entity may not make a subsequent tender offer for the purchase of shares of the target company and may not enter into a merger with the target company for a period of one year from the date of the offer, unless the purchaser or such person or entity undertook to effect such an offer or merger in the initial special tender offer.

Merger

The Companies Law permits merger transactions if approved by each party’s board of directors and, unless certain requirements described under the Companies Law are met, by a majority vote of each party’s shares, and, in the case of the target company, a majority vote of each class of its shares voted on the proposed merger at a shareholders meeting.

For purposes of the shareholder vote, unless a court rules otherwise, the merger will not be deemed approved if a majority of the votes of the shares represented at the shareholders meeting that are held by parties other than the other party to the merger, or by any person (or group of persons acting in concert) who holds (or hold, as the case may be) 25% or more of the voting rights or the right to appoint 25% or more of the directors of the other party, vote against the merger. If, however, the merger involves a merger with a company’s own controlling shareholder or if the controlling shareholder has a personal interest in the merger, then the merger is instead subject to the same special majority approval that governs all extraordinary transactions with controlling shareholders (as described under “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—C. Board Practices—Fiduciary duties and approval of specified related party transactions and compensation under Israeli law—Disclosure of personal interests of a controlling shareholder and approval of transactions”). 

If the transaction would have been approved by the shareholders of a merging company but for the separate approval of each class or the exclusion of the votes of certain shareholders as provided above, a court may still approve the merger upon the request of holders of at least 25% of the voting rights of a company, if the court holds that the merger is fair and reasonable, taking into account the value to the parties to the merger and the consideration offered to the shareholders of the company.

Upon the request of a creditor of either party to the proposed merger, the court may delay or prevent the merger if it concludes that there exists a reasonable concern that, as a result of the merger, the surviving company will be unable to satisfy the obligations of the merging entities, and may further give instructions to secure the rights of creditors.

In addition, a merger may not be consummated unless at least 50 days have passed from the date on which a proposal for approval of the merger was filed by each party with the Israeli Registrar of Companies and at least 30 days have passed from the date on which the merger was approved by the shareholders of each party.

Borrowing powers

Pursuant to the Companies Law and our articles of association, our board of directors may exercise all powers and take all actions that are not required under law or under our articles of association to be exercised or taken by a certain organ of the Company, including the power to borrow money for company purposes.

Changes in capital

Our articles of association enable us to increase or reduce our share capital. Any such changes are subject to the provisions of the Companies Law and must be approved by a resolution duly adopted by our shareholders at a general meeting. In addition, transactions that have the effect of reducing capital, such as the declaration and payment of dividends in the absence of sufficient retained earnings or profits, require the approval of both our board of directors and an Israeli court.

92

Transfer agent and registrar

Our transfer agent and registrar is the Depositary for the ADSs, Bank of New York Mellon, and its address is 101 Barclay Street, 22W New York, NY 10286.

Preemptive Rights

Pursuant to the terms of the securities purchase agreements relating to an offering of our ADSs and warrants which closed on December 6, 2016, we granted the purchasers in such offering an eighteen month contractual preemptive right to participate in future financings, subject to certain exceptions, in an amount equal to up to 50% of the amount raised in such future financings. Other than the preemptive rights described herein, our ordinary shares and ADSs are not subject to any other preemptive rights.

Listing

Our ordinary shares currently trade on the TASE in Israel under the symbol “MDGS,” and our ADSs are listed on the NASDAQ under the symbol “MDGS.”Form 20-F.

 

C.Material Contracts

 

ExceptThe following are summary descriptions of certain material agreements to which we are a party. The descriptions provided below do not purport to be complete and are qualified in their entirety by the complete agreements, which are attached as set forth below, we have not entered into any material contract within the three years priorexhibits to the date of this annual report filed on Form 20-F, other than contracts entered into in the ordinary course of business.20-F. 

 

Securities PurchaseAmended and Restated Asset Transfer Agreement November 24, 2017& License Agreement

 

On November 24, 2017,December 1, 2019, Medigus and ScoutCam Ltd. (ScoutCam) consummated a certain Amended and Restated Asset Transfer Agreement, effective March 1, 2019, which transferred and assigned certain assets and intellectual property rights related to its miniaturized imaging business (A&R Transfer Agreement), and a patent license. Under the A&R Transfer Agreement, we transferred two patent families in exchange for a license in connection with the marketing and sale of the Medigus Ultrasonic Surgical Endostapler. In addition, we granted to ScoutCam a license to access, use, improve, develop, market and sell licensed intellectual property, including the right to any future versions, enhancements, improvements and derivative works of such licensed intellectual property in connection with the development and commercialization of the ScoutCam miniature video technology.

88

Intellisense Securities Exchange Agreement

On September 16, 2019 we entered a securities exchange agreement with Intelllisense Solutions Inc., a Nevada corporation (Intellisense). Under the securities exchange agreement, we assigned and transferred 100% of our holdings in ScoutCam to Intellisense in exchange for common stock of Intellisense representing 60% of its issued and outstanding share capital as of the closing of the securities exchange agreement. In addition, in the event that ScoutCam meets certain sales targets within the first three years following the closing of the securities exchange agreement, we will receive additional stock of Intellisense representing 10% of its outstanding share capital calculated as of the closing. Subsequently, Intellisense changed its name to ScoutCam Inc., effective December 31, 2019.

Algomizer Group Investment Agreement

On September 3, 2019 we consummated an investment agreement in Algomizer Ltd. (Algomizer) and its wholly owned subsidiary Linkury Ltd. (Algomizer Group), for an aggregate investment of $5,000,000. The investment agreement contains customary provisions and warranties, and provides for us to invest NIS 5.4 million directly in Algomizer, which engages in internet advertising and whose shares are traded on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange. The investment will be made at a price per Algomizer share of NIS 4.15. We invested an additional NIS 9 million through a direct acquisition of the shares of Linkury from Algomizer, at a company valuation of Linkury of approximately NIS 96 million. We will further invest an additional $1 million in Algomizer through equity exchange by issuing Algomizer American Depositary Shares (ADRs) at a price of $3 per ADR in consideration for Algomizer shares based on a price per Algomizer share of NIS 4.15. In addition, we issued Algomizer warrants to purchase our ADRs in an amount equal to the ADRs issued to Algomizer, at an exercise price of $4 per ADR.

MUSELicensing and Sale Agreement, dated June 3, 2019

On June 3, 2019, we entered into a securities purchase agreementsLicensing and Sale Agreement with Shanghai Golden Grand-Medical Instruments Ltd. (Golden Grand) for the know-how licensing and sale of good relating to the Medigus Ultrasonic Surgical Endostapler (MUSE) system in China, Hong Kong, Taiwan and Macao. Under the agreement, we committed to provide a license, training services and goods to Golden Grand in consideration for $3,000,000 to be paid to us in four milestone based installments. The final milestone shall be completed and the final installment paid upon completion of a MUSE assembly line in China.

Underwriting Agreement, dated July 19, 2018

On July 19, 2018, we entered into an underwriting agreement as part of an offering of our ADSs pursuant to our shelfa registration statement in the United States. As part of the offering we issued a total of 810,000 of our ADSs representing a total of 40,500,000 ordinary shares,577,529 Class C Units at a purchase price per unit of US$2.00$3.50 and of 2,260,145 Class D Units at a purchase price per unit of $3.49. Each Class C unit consists of (i) one American Depositary Share, or ADS, and (ii) one Series C warrant to purchase one ADS, and each Class D unit consists of (i) one pre-funded warrant to purchase one ADS, and (ii) one Series C warrant to purchase one ADS. The Series C Warrants have a term of five years, and are exercisable immediately and have an exercise price of $3.50 per ADS and warrants to purchase up to a total of 405,000 ADSs representing 20,250,000 ordinary shares, at an initial exercise price of $2.25 per ADS, in a concurrent private placement.are listed on Nasdaq. In addition, as part of such offering, we issued to H.C. Wainwright & Co., acting as placement agentunderwriter in our offering, warrants to purchase up toan aggregate of 56,700198,637 ADSs representing 2,835,0003,972,740 ordinary shares, with an exercise price of $2.5$4.375 per ADS. Pursuant to the engagement letter executed with H.C. Wainwright & Co. relating to the offering, we agreed to provide the placement agent with the right of first refusal, expiring on the twelve month anniversary following the closing of the offering, if we or our subsidiaries decide to raise funds by means of a public offering or a private placement of equity or debt securities using an underwriter or placement agent in the U.S.

Securities Purchase Agreement, dated March 24, 2017

On March 24, 2017, we entered into a securities purchase agreements as part of an offering of our ADSs pursuant to a registration statement in the United States. As part ofU.S. In connection with the offering, we issuedgranted the underwriter a total of 979,714 Class A Units at a purchase price per unit of $3.50 and of 1,163,144 Class B Units at a purchase price per unit of $3.49. Each Class A unit consists of (i) one American Depositary Share, or ADS, and (ii) one Series A warrant30-day option to purchase one ADS, and each Class B unit consists of (i) one pre-funded warrantup to purchase one ADS, and (ii) one425,651 additional ADSs and/or 425,651 Series A warrant to purchase one ADS. The Series A warrants have a term of five years, and are exercisable immediately (or, at the election of the purchaser, six months following the issuance date) and have an exercise price of $3.50 per ADS. The pre-funded warrants are exercisable immediately until exercised in full and have an exercise price of $0.01 per ADS. In addition, as part of such offering, we issued to Rodman & Renshaw, a unit of H.C. Wainwright & Co., acting as placement agent in our offering,C warrants to purchase up toan aggregate of 150,000ADSs representing 7,500,000 ordinary shares, with an exercise price of $4.375 per ADS. Pursuant additional 425,651 ADSs. The underwriter partially exercised its option to the engagement letter executed with Rodman & Renshaw relating to the offering, we agreed to provide the placement agent with the right of first refusal, expiring on the twelve month anniversary following the closing of the offering, if we or our subsidiaries decide to raise fundspurchase additional securities by means of a public offering or a private placement of equity or debt securities using an underwriter or placement agent in the United States.

93

Securities Purchase Agreement, November 30, 2016

On November 30, 2016, we entered into a securities purchase agreements as part of an offering of our ADSs pursuant to our shelf registration statement in the United States. As part of the offering we issued a total of 113,917 of our ADSs representing a total of 5,695,850 ordinary shares, at a purchase price of US$6.7 per ADS, andpurchasing 425,651 Series C warrants to purchase up to a total of 39,871 ADSs representing 1,993,550 ordinary shares, at an initial exercise price of $9.00 per ADS, in a concurrent private placement. In addition, as part of such offering, we issued Rodman and Renshaw, a unit of H.C. Wainwright & Co, LLC, acting as placement agent warrants to purchase up toan aggregate of 3,987ADSs representing 199,355 ordinary shares, with an exercise price of $7.37 per ADS. Pursuant to the engagement letter executed with the placement agent, Rodman & Renshaw, relating to the offering, we agreed to provide the placement agent with the right of first refusal, expiring on the twelve month anniversary following the closingadditional 425,651 ADSs. As of the offering, if we or our subsidiaries decide to raise funds by meansdate of a public offering or a private placement of equity or debt securities using an underwriter or placement agent in the U.S.this report, all pre-funded warrants were exercised.

 

Securities Purchase Agreement, dated September 8, 2016

89

On September 8, 2016, we entered into a securities purchase agreements as part of an offering of our ADSs pursuant to our shelf registration statement in the United States. As part of the offering we issued a total of 128,000 of our ADSs representing a total of 6,400,000 ordinary shares, at a purchase price of US$11.50 per ADS. In addition, as part of such offering, we issued to Roth Capital Partners, LLC, acting as the lead placement agent, and Maxim Group LLC, acting as the co-placement agent warrants to purchase up toan aggregate of 3,955ADSs representing 197,750 ordinary shares, with an exercise price of $14.375 per ADS.

   

D.Exchange Controls

 

There are currently no Israeli currency control restrictions on payments of dividends or other distributions with respect to our securities or the proceeds from the sale of our securities, except or otherwise as set forth in this section and under “Item 10E. Additional Information — Taxation.” However, legislation remains in effect pursuant to which currency controls can be imposed by administrative action at any time.

 

The ownership or voting of our ordinary shares by non-residents of Israel, except with respect to citizens of countries that are in a state of war with Israel, is not restricted in any way by our articles or by the laws of the State of Israel.

  

E.Taxation

 

The following description is not intended to constitute a complete analysis of all tax consequences relating to the acquisition, ownership and disposition of our ordinary shares. You should consult your own tax advisor concerning the tax consequences of your particular situation, as well as any tax consequences that may arise under the laws of any state, local, foreign or other taxing jurisdiction.

 

Israeli Tax Considerations and Government Programs

 

The following is a summary of the material Israeli tax laws applicable to us, and some Israeli Government programs benefiting us. This section also contains a discussion of some Israeli tax consequences to persons owning our ordinary shares. This summary does not discuss all the aspects of Israeli tax law that may be relevant to a particular investor in light of his or her personal investment circumstances or to some types of investors subject to special treatment under Israeli law. Examples of this kind of investor include traders in securities or persons that own, directly or indirectly, 10% or more of our outstanding voting capital, all of whom are subject to special tax regimes not covered in this discussion. Some parts of this discussion are based on a new tax legislation which has not been subject to judicial or administrative interpretation. The discussion should not be construed as legal or professional tax advice and does not cover all possible tax considerations.

 

94

SHAREHOLDERS ARE URGED TO CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX ADVISORS AS TO THE ISRAELI OR OTHER TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE PURCHASE, OWNERSHIP AND DISPOSITION OF OUR ORDINARY SHARES, INCLUDING, IN PARTICULAR, THE EFFECT OF ANY FOREIGN, STATE OR LOCAL TAXES.

 

General Corporate Tax Structure in Israel

 

Israeli resident companies are generally subject to corporate tax on their taxable income at the rate of 23% of a company’s taxable income as of 20182019 tax year (in 2017 the taxable income rate was 24%).year. However, the effective tax rate payable by a company that derives income from a Benefited Enterprise or a Preferred Enterprise (as discussed below) may be considerably less. Capital gains derived by an Israeli resident company are subject to tax at the prevailing corporate tax rate.

 

Law for the Encouragement of Industry (Taxes), 5729-1969

 

The Law for the Encouragement of Industry (Taxes), 5729-1969, generally referred to as the Industry Encouragement Law, provides several tax benefits for “Industrial Companies.”

 

The Industry Encouragement Law defines an “Industrial Company” as a company resident in Israel which was incorporated in Israel, of which 90% or more of its income in the tax year, other than income from defensecertain government loans, is derived from an “Industrial Enterprise” owned by it and located in Israel. An “Industrial Enterprise” is defined as an enterprise whose principal activity in aany given tax year is industrial activity.

 


The following corporate tax benefits, among others, are available to Industrial Companies:

 

 amortizationAmortization over an eight-year period commencing on the year in which such rights were first exercised, of the cost of purchased know-how and patents, and rights to use a patent and know-how which are used for the development or advancement of the Industrial Enterprise;
   
 underUnder limited conditions, an election to file consolidated tax returns with related Israeli Industrial Companies;Companies controlled by it; and
   
 expensesExpenses related to a public offering are deductible in equal amounts over a three years.years period commencing on the year of the offering.

 

weWe may qualify as an Industrial Company and may be eligible for the benefits described above.

  

Tax Benefits and Grants for Research and Development

 

Israeli tax law allows, under certain conditions, a tax deduction for research and development expenditures, including capital expenditures, for the year in which they are incurred.over three-years period. Expenditures are deemed related to scientific research and development projects, if:

  

 The expenditures are approved by the relevant Israeli government ministry, determined by the field of research;
   
 The research and development must be for the promotion of the company; and
   
 The research and development is carried out by or on behalf of the company seeking such tax deduction.

  

The amount of such deductible expenses is reduced by the sum of any funds received through government grants for the finance of such scientific research and development projects. No deduction under these research and development deduction rules is allowed if such deduction is related to an expense invested in an asset depreciable under the general depreciation rules of the income Tax Ordinance, 1961. Expenditures not so approved are deductible in equal amounts over three years.

 

From time to time we may apply the IIA for approval to allow a tax deduction for all research and development expensesexpenses/more than a third during the year incurred.incurred, rather than deduction over three-years period. There can be no assurance that such application will be accepted.

 

95

Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments, 5719-1959

 

The Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments, 5719-1959, generally referred to as the Investment Law, provides certain incentives for capital investments in production facilities (or other eligible assets) by “Industrial Enterprises” (as defined under the Investment Law).

 

The Investment Law has been amended several times over the recent years, with the three most significant changes effective as of April 1, 2005 (referred to as the 2005 Amendment), as of January 1, 2011 (referred to as the 2011 Amendment) and as of January 1, 2017 (referred to as the 2017 Amendment).

Tax Benefits Subsequent to the 2005 Amendment

 

The 2005 Amendment applies to new investment programs and investment programs commencing after 2004, but does not apply to investment programs approved prior to April 1, 2005. The 2005 Amendment provides that terms and benefits included in any certificate of approval that was granted before the 2005 Amendment became effective (April 1, 2005) will remain subject to the provisions of the Investment Law as in effect on the date of such approval. Pursuant to the 2005 Amendment, the Israeli Authority for Investments and Development of the Israeli Ministry of Economy (referred to as the Investment CenterCenter) will continue to grant Approved Enterprise status to qualifying investments. The 2005 Amendment, however, limits the scope of enterprises that may be approved by the Investment Center by setting criteria for the approval of a facility as an Approved Enterprise, such as provisions generally requiring that at least 25% of the Approved Enterprise’s income be derived from exports.

 


An enterprise that qualifies under the new provisions is referred to as a “Beneficiary Enterprise”, rather than “Approved Enterprise”. The 2005 Amendment provides that Approved Enterprise status will only be necessary for receiving cash grants. As a result, it was no longer necessary for a company to obtain Approved Enterprise status in order to receive the tax benefits previously available under the alternative benefits track. Rather, a company may claim the tax benefits offered by the Investment Law directly in its tax returns, provided that its facilities meet the criteria for tax benefits set forth in the amendment.2005 Amendment. Such position may be subject to a future tax audit. Companies are entitled to approach the Israeli Tax Authority for a pre-ruling regarding their eligibility for benefits under the Investment Law, as amendedamended.

 

Tax benefits are available under the 2005 Amendment to production facilities (or other eligible facilities) which are generally required to derive 25% or more of their business income from export to specific markets with a population of at least 14 million in 2012 (such export criteria will further be increased in the future by 1.4% per annum). In order to receive the tax benefits, the 2005 Amendment states that a company must make an investment which meets all of the conditions, including exceeding a minimum investment amount specified in the Investment Law. Such investment allows a company to receive “Benefited Enterprise” status, and may be made over a period of no more than three years that will end at the year in which the company requested to have the tax benefits apply to its Benefited Enterprise. The benefits period under the Beneficiary Enterprise status is limited to 12 years from the year the company chose to have its tax benefits apply. Where the company requests to apply the tax benefits to an expansion of existing facilities, only the expansion will be considered to be a Benefited Enterprise and the company’s effective tax rate will be the weighted average of the applicable rates. In this case, the minimum investment required in order to qualify as a Benefited Enterprise is required to exceed a certain percentage of the value of the company’s production assets before the expansion.

 

The extent of the tax benefits available under the 2005 Amendment to qualifying income of a Benefited Enterprise depend on, among other things, the geographic location in Israel of the Benefited Enterprise. The location will also determine the period for which tax benefits are available. Such tax benefits include an exemption from corporate tax on undistributed income for a period of between two to ten years, depending on the geographic location of the Benefited Enterprise in Israel, and a reduced corporate tax rate of between 10% to the applicable corporate tax25% for the remainder of the benefits period, depending on the level of foreign investment in the company in each year. The benefits period is limited to 12 or 14 years from the year the company first chose to have the tax benefits apply, depending on the location of the company within Israel.

A company qualifying for tax benefits under the 2005 Amendment which pays a dividend out of income derived by its Benefited Enterprise during the tax exemption period will be subject to corporate tax in respect of the gross amount of the dividend, at the otherwise applicable corporate tax rate, or a lower rate in the case of a qualified FIC which is at least 49% owned by non-Israeli residents. Dividends paid out of income attributed to a Benefited Enterprise (or out of dividends received from a company whose income is attributed to a Benefited Enterprise) are generally subject to withholding tax at source at the rate of 15% or such lower rate as may be provided in an applicable tax treaty. The reduced rate of 15% is limited to dividends and distributions out of income attributed to a Benefited Enterprise during the benefits period and actually paid at any time up to 12 years thereafter except with respect to a qualified Foreign Investment Company (as such term is defined in the Investment Law), in which case the 12-year limit does not apply.

 

The benefits available to a Benefited Enterprise are subject to the fulfillment of conditions stipulated in the Investment Law and its regulations. If a company does not meet these conditions, it may be required to refund the amount of tax benefits, as adjusted by the Israeli consumer price index, and interest, or other monetary penalties.

 

We applied for tax benefits as a “Benefited Enterprise” with 20122005 as a “Year of Election.”Election”. In addition, the Company elected that years 2009 and 2012 be “years of election” for expansion of the benefited enterprise. We may be entitled to tax benefits under this regime once we are profitable for tax purposes and subject to the fulfillment of all the relevant conditions. If we do not meet these conditions, the tax benefits may not be applicable which would result in adverse tax consequences to us. Alternatively, and subject to the fulfillment of all the relevant conditions, we may elect in the future to irrevocably waive the tax benefits available for Benefited Enterprise and claim the tax benefits available to Preferred Enterprise under the 2011 Amendment (as detailed below).

 

96

Tax Benefits under the 2011 Amendment

 

The Investment Law was significantly amended as of January 1, 2011 (the “2011 Amendment”). The 2011 Amendment introduced new benefits to replace those granted in accordance with the provisions of the Investment Law in effect prior to the 2011 Amendment.

 

The 2011 Amendment introduced new tax benefits for income generated by a “Preferred Company” through its “Preferred Enterprise,” in accordance with the definition of such term in the Investments Law, which generally means that aLaw. A “Preferred Company” is an industrialdefined as either: (i) a company meeting certain conditions (includingincorporated in Israel which is not wholly owned by a minimum thresholdgovernmental entity, or (ii) a limited partnership that: (a) was registered under the Israeli Partnerships Ordinance and; (b) all of 25% export).its limited partners are companies incorporated in Israel, but not all of them are governmental entities; which has, among other things, Preferred Enterprise status and is controlled and managed from Israel.

 

A Preferred Company is entitled to a reduced flat tax rate with respect to the income attributed to the Preferred Enterprise, at the following rates:

 

Tax Year Development Region “A”  Other Areas within Israel
2011 – 2012  10% 15%
2013  7% 12.5%
2014  9% 16%
2017 onwards(1)  7.5% 16%

Tax Year Development Region “A”  Other Areas within Israel 
2011 – 2012  10%  15%
2013  7%  12.5%
2014  9%  16%
2017 onwards(1)  7.5%  16%

 

(1)In December 2016, the Israeli Parliament (the Knesset) approved an amendment to the Investment Law pursuant to which the tax rate applicable to Preferred Enterprises in Development Region “A” would be reduced to 7.5% as of 2017.

 

Dividends distributed from income which is attributed to a “Preferred Enterprise” will be subject to withholding tax at source at the following rates: (i) Israeli resident corporations — 0% (although, if such dividends are subsequently distributed to individuals or a non-Israeli company, withholding tax at a rate of 20% or such lower rate as may be provided in an applicable tax treaty will apply), (ii) Israeli resident individuals — 20%, and (iii) non-Israeli residents — 20%, subject to a reduced tax rate under the provisions of an applicable double tax treaty.

 

Under the 2011 Amendment, a company located in Development Region “A” may be entitled to cash grants and the provision of loans under certain conditions, if approved. The rates for grants and loans shall not be fixed, but up to 20% of the amount of the approved investment (may be increased with additional 4%). In addition, a company owning a Preferred Enterprise under the Grant Track may be entitled also to the tax benefits which are prescribed for a Preferred Company.

  

The 2011 Amendment also provided transitional provisions to address companies already enjoying current benefits under the Investment Law. These transitional provisions provide, among other things, that unless an irrevocable request is made to apply the provisions of the Investment Law as amended in 2011 with respect to income to be derived as of January 1, 2011: (i) the terms and benefits included in any certificate of approval that was granted to an Approved Enterprise, which chose to receive grants, before the 2011 Amendment became effective, will remain subject to the provisions of the Investment Law as in effect on the date of such approval, and subject to certain conditions;. (ii) the terms and benefits included in any certificate of approval that was granted to an Approved Enterprise, that had participated in an alternative benefits program, before the 2011 Amendment became effective will remain subject to the provisions of the Investment Law as in effect on the date of such approval, provided that certain conditions are met; and (iii) a Beneficiary Enterprise can elect to continue to benefit from the benefits provided to it before the 2011 Amendment came into effect, provided that certain conditions are met.

The termination or substantial reduction of any of the benefits available under the Investment Law could materially increase our tax liabilities.

 

We are currentlyAs the Company does not entitled tohave taxable income as of today, it does not use tax benefits under the said regime.


New Tax benefits under the 2017 Amendment that became effective on January 1, 2017

The 2017 Amendment was enacted as part of the Economic Efficiency Law that was published on December 29, 2016, and is effective as of January 1, 2017. The 2017 Amendment provides new tax benefits for Preferred Enterprise.two types of Technology Enterprises, as described below, and is in addition to the other existing tax beneficial programs under the Investment Law.

 

The 2017 Amendment provides that a technology company satisfying certain conditions will qualify as a Preferred Technology Enterprise and will thereby enjoy a reduced corporate tax rate of 12% on income that qualifies as Preferred Technology Income, as defined in the Investment Law. The tax rate is further reduced to 7.5% for a Preferred Technology Enterprise located in development zone A. In addition, a Preferred Technology Company will enjoy a reduced corporate tax rate of 12% on capital gain derived from the sale of certain Benefited Intangible Assets (as defined in the Investment Law) to a related foreign company if the Benefited Intangible Assets were acquired from a foreign company on or after January 1, 2017 for at least NIS 200 million, and the sale receives prior approval from the National Authority for Technological Innovation (previously known as the Israeli Office of the Chief Scientist) (referred to as IIA).

The 2017 Amendment further provides that a technology company satisfying certain conditions will qualify as a “Special Preferred Technology Enterprise” (an enterprise for which, among others, total consolidated revenues of its parent company and all subsidiaries exceed NIS 10 billion) and will thereby enjoy a reduced corporate tax rate of 6% on Preferred Technology Income regardless of the company’s geographic location within Israel. In addition, a Special Preferred Technology Enterprise will enjoy a reduced corporate tax rate of 6% on capital gain derived from the sale of certain “Benefited Intangible Assets” to a related foreign company if the Benefited Intangible Assets were either developed by an Israeli company or acquired from a foreign company on or after January 1, 2017, and the sale received prior approval from IIA. A Special Preferred Technology Enterprise that acquires Benefited Intangible Assets from a foreign company for more than NIS 500 million will be eligible for these benefits for at least ten years, subject to certain approvals as specified in the Investment Law.

 Dividends distributed by a Preferred Technology Enterprise or a Special Preferred Technology Enterprise, paid out of Preferred Technology Income, are generally subject to withholding tax at source at the rate of 20% or such lower rate as may be provided in an applicable tax treaty (subject to the receipt in advance of a valid certificate from the Israel Tax Authority allowing for a reduced tax rate). However, if such dividends are paid to an Israeli company, no tax is required to be withheld. If such dividends are distributed to a foreign company and other conditions are met, the withholding tax rate will be 4% (or a lower rate under a tax treaty, if applicable, subject to the receipt in advance of a valid certificate from the Israel Tax Authority allowing for a reduced tax rate).

Taxation of Our Shareholders

 

Capital Gains

  

Capital gain tax is imposed on the disposition of capital assets by an Israeli resident, and on the disposition of such assets by a non-Israeli resident if those assets are either (i) located in Israel; (ii) are shares or a right to a share in an Israeli resident corporation, or (iii) represent, directly or indirectly, rights to assets located in Israel.Israel, unless a tax treaty between Israel and the seller’s country of residence provides otherwise. The Israeli Income Tax Ordinance of 1961 (New Version) (the “Ordinance”) distinguishes between “Real Capital Gain” and the “Inflationary Surplus.” Real Gain is the excess of the total capital gain over Inflationary Surplus computed generally on the basis of the increase in the Israeli Consumer Price Index or CPI between the date of purchase and the date of disposition. Inflationary Surplus is not subject to tax in Israel.

 

97

Generally, Real Capital Gain accrued by individuals on the sale of our ordinary shares will be taxed at the rate of 25%. However, if the individual shareholder is a “Controlling Shareholder” (i.e., a person who holds, directly or indirectly, alone or together with such person’s relative or another person who collaborates with such person on a permanent basis, 10% or more of one of the Israeli resident company’s means of control)control (including, among other things, the right to receive profits of the company, voting rights, the right to receive the company’s liquidation proceeds and the right to appoint a director)) at the time of sale or at any time during the preceding 12 months period, such gain will be taxed at the rate of 30%.

 


Real Capital Gain derived by corporations will be generally subject to a corporate tax rate of 24% in 2017 and 23% as of 2018.2018 and thereafter.

 

Individual and corporate shareholder dealing in securities in Israel are taxed at the tax rates applicable to business income — 23% for corporations as of 2018 and a marginal tax rate of up to 47% in 2018 for individuals.

 

Notwithstanding the foregoing, capital gain derived from the sale of our ordinary shares by a non-Israeli shareholder may be exempt under the Ordinance from Israeli taxation provided that the following cumulative conditions are met: (i) the shares were purchased upon or after the registration of the securities on the stock exchange (this condition will not apply to shares purchased on or after January 1, 2009), (ii) the seller does not have a permanent establishment in Israel to which the derived capital gain is attributed, (iii) neither the shareholder nor the particular capital gain is otherwise subject to the Israeli Income Tax Law (Inflationary Adjustments) 5745-1985) (this condition will not apply to shares purchased on or after January 1, 2009), (iv) if the seller is a corporation, no more than 25% of its means of control are held, directly and indirectly, by an Israeli resident shareholders, and there is no Israeli Resident that is entitled to 25% or more of the revenues or profits of the corporation directly or indirectly. In addition, such exemption would not be available to a person whose gains from selling or otherwise disposing of the securities are deemed to be business income.

 

In addition, the sale of shares may be exempt from Israeli capital gain tax under the provisions of an applicable tax treaty. For example, the U.S.-Israel Double Tax Treaty exempts U.S. resident from Israeli capital gain tax in connection with such sale, provided that (i) the U.S. resident owned, directly or indirectly, less than 10% of an Israeli resident company’s voting power at any time within the 12 month period preceding such sale; (ii) the seller, being an individual, is present in Israel for a period or periods of less than 183 days in the aggregate at the taxable year; and (iii) the capital gain from the sale was not derived through a permanent establishment of the U.S. resident in Israel. In each case,Israel; (iv) the capital gain arising from such sale, exchange or disposition is not attributed to real estate located in Israel; (v) the capital gains arising from such sale, exchange or disposition is not attributed to royalties; and (vi) the shareholder is a U.S. resident (for purposes of suchthe U.S.-Israel Treaty) is holding the shares would be subject to Israeli tax, to the extent applicable; however, underas a capital asset. Under the U.S.-Israel Double Tax Treaty, a U.S. resident would be permitted to claim a credit for the Israeli tax against the U.S. federal income tax imposed with respect to the sale, exchange or disposition, subject to the limitations in U.S. laws applicable to foreign tax credits. The U.S-Israel Double Tax Treaty does not provide such credit against any U.S. state or local taxes.

 

In some instances where our shareholders may be liable for Israeli tax on the sale of their ordinary shares, the payment of the consideration may be subject to the withholding of Israeli tax at source. Shareholders may be required to demonstrate that they are exempt from tax on their capital gains in order to avoid withholding at source at the time of sale. Specifically, in transactions involving a sale of all of the shares of an Israeli resident company, in the form of a merger or otherwise, the Israel Tax Authority may require from shareholders who are not liable for Israeli tax to sign declarations in forms specified by this authority or obtain a specific exemption from the Israel Tax Authority to confirm their status as non-Israeli resident, and, in the absence of such declarations or exemptions, may require the purchaser of the shares to withhold taxes at source.

  

Either the purchaser, the Israeli stockbrokers or financial institution through which the shares are held is obliged, subject to the above mentionedabove-mentioned exemptions, to withhold tax upon the sale of securities from the Real Capital Gain at the rate of up to 25% with respect to an individual, or at a rate of corporate tax with respect to a corporation (23% in 2018 and thereafter).

 

At the sale of securities traded on a stock exchange a detailed return, including a computation of the tax due, must be filed and an advanced payment must be paid on January 31 and June 30July 31 of every tax year in respect of sales of securities made within the previous six months. However, if all tax due was withheld at source according to applicable provisions of the Ordinance and regulations promulgated thereunder the aforementioned return need not be filed and no advance payment must be paid. Capital gain is also reportable on the annual income tax return.

 

98

Dividends

 

We have never paid cash dividends. A distribution of dividend by our company from income attributed to a Benefited Enterprise will generally be subject to withholding tax in Israel at a rate of 15% unless a reduced tax rate is provided under an applicable tax treaty. A distribution of dividend by our company from income attributed to a Preferred Enterprise (if the company will be entitled to tax benefits of a Preferred Enterprise) will generally be subject to withholding tax in Israel at the following tax rates: Israeli resident individuals — 20%; Israeli resident companies — 0%; Non-Israeli residents — 20%, subject to a reduced rate under the provisions of any applicable double tax treaty.

A distribution of dividends from income, which is not attributed to a Preferred Enterprise or a Benefited Enterprise to an Israeli resident individual, will generally be subject to withholding tax at a rate of 25%. However, a 30% tax rate will apply if the dividend recipient is a “Controlling Shareholder” (as defined above) at the time of distribution or at any time during the preceding 12 months period. If the recipient of the dividend is an Israeli resident corporation, such dividend will be exempt from withholding tax provided the income from which such dividend is distributed was derived or accrued within Israel and was subject to tax in Israel.

 

The Ordinance provides that a non-Israeli resident (either individual or corporation) is generally subject to an Israeli income tax on the receipt of dividends at the rate of 25% (30% if the dividends recipient is a “Controlling Shareholder” (as defined above), at the time of distribution or at any time during the preceding 12 months period); those rates are subject to a reduced tax rate under the provisions of an applicable double tax treaty.treaty (subject to the receipt in advance of a valid certificate from the ITA allowing for a reduced tax rate). Thus, under the U.S.-Israel Double Tax Treaty the following rates will apply in respect of dividends distributed by an Israeli resident company to a U.S. resident: (i) if the U.S. resident is a corporation which holds during that portion of the taxable year which precedes the date of payment of the dividend and during the whole of its prior taxable year (if any), at least 10% of the outstanding shares of the voting share capital of the Israeli resident paying corporation and not more than 25% of the gross income of the Israeli resident paying corporation for such prior taxable year (if any) consists of certain type of interest or dividends — the tax rate is 12.5%, (ii) if both the conditions mentioned in section (i) above are met and the dividend is paid from an Israeli resident company’s income which was entitled to a reduced tax rate applicable to an Approved Enterprise or a Benefited Enterprise — the tax rate is 15% and (iii) in all other cases, the tax rate is 25%. The aforementioned rates under the Israel U.S. Double Tax Treaty will not apply if the dividend income was derived through a permanent establishment of the U.S. resident in Israel.

 

A non-Israeli resident who receives dividends from which tax was withheld is generally exempt from the obligation to file tax returns in Israel with respect to such income, provided that (i) such income was not generated from business conducted in Israel by the taxpayer, and (ii) the taxpayer has no other taxable sources of income in Israel with respect to which a tax return is required to be filed.

 

Payers of dividends on our ordinary shares, including the Israeli stockbroker effectuating the transaction, or the financial institution through which the securities are held, are generally required, subject to any of the foregoing exemptions, reduced tax rates and the demonstration of a shareholder regarding his, her or its foreign residency, to withhold tax upon the distribution of dividend at the rate of 25%, so long as the shares are registered with a nominee company.

 

Excess Tax

 

Individuals who are subject to tax in Israel are also subject to an additional tax at a rate of 3% as of 20172018 on annual income exceeding a certain threshold (NIS 640,000649,560 for 2017 and thereafter,2019, which amount is linked to the annual change in the Israeli Consumer Price Index)CPI), including, but not limited to income derived from, dividends, interest and capital gains.

  

Foreign Exchange Regulations

 

Non-residents of Israel who hold our ordinary shares are able to receive any dividends, and any amounts payable upon the dissolution, liquidation and winding up of our affairs, repayable in non-Israeli currency at the rate of exchange prevailing at the time of conversion. However, Israeli income tax is generally required to have been paid or withheld on these amounts. In addition, the statutory framework for the potential imposition of currency exchange control has not been eliminated, and may be restored at any time by administrative action.

 

99

Estate and Gift Tax

 

Israeli law presently does not impose estate or gift taxes.

 

U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences

 

The following discussion describes certain material U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S. Holders (as defined below) under present law of an investment in our ordinary shares. This discussion applies only to U.S. Holders that hold our ordinary shares as capital assets within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), that have acquired their ordinary shares or ADSs and that have the U.S. dollar as their functional currency.

 

This discussion is based on the tax laws of the United States, including the Code, as in effect on the date hereof and on U.S. Treasury regulations as in effect or, in some cases, as proposed, on the date hereof, as well as judicial and administrative interpretations thereof available on or before such date. All of the foregoing authorities are subject to change, which change could apply retroactively and could affect the tax consequences described below. There can be no assurances that the IRS will not take a different position concerning the tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of our shares or that such a position would not be sustained. This summary does not address any estate or gift tax consequences, the alternative minimum tax, the Medicare tax on net investment income or any state, local, or non-U.S. tax consequences.

 

The following discussion neither deals with the tax consequences to any particular investor nor describes all of the tax consequences applicable to persons in special tax situations such as:

 

banks;

 

certain financial institutions;

 

insurance companies;

 

regulated investment companies;

 

real estate investment trusts;

 

broker-dealers;

 

traders that elect to mark to market;

 

certain former citizens or residents of the United States;

 

tax-exempt entities;

 

persons holding our ordinary shares as part of a straddle, hedging, constructive sale, conversion or integrated transaction;

 

persons that actually or constructively own 10% or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of our voting share capital;

 

persons that are resident or ordinarily resident in or have a permanent establishment in a jurisdiction outside the United States;

 

persons who acquired our ordinary shares pursuant to the exercise of any employee share option or otherwise as compensation; or

  

 S-corporation and partnerships, including entities classified as partnerships for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

 

100

INVESTORS ARE URGED TO CONSULT THEIR TAX ADVISORS ABOUT THE APPLICATION OF THE U.S. FEDERAL TAX RULES TO THEIR PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES AS WELL AS THE STATE, LOCAL, NON-U.S. AND OTHER TAX CONSEQUENCES TO THEM OF THE PURCHASE, OWNERSHIP AND DISPOSITION OF OUR ORDINARY SHARES.

 

The discussion below of the U.S. federal income tax consequences to “U.S. Holders” will apply to you if you are the beneficial owner of our ordinary shares and you are, for U.S. federal income tax purposes,

 

an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States;

 

a corporation (or other entity taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) created or organized in the United States or under the laws of the United States, any state thereof or the District of Columbia;

 

an estate, the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source; or

 

a trust that (1) is subject to the primary supervision of a court within the United States and the control of one or more U.S. persons for all substantial decisions or (2) has a valid election in effect under applicable U.S. Treasury regulations to be treated as a U.S. person.

 

If an entity or other arrangement treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes holds our ordinary shares, the tax treatment of a partner will generally depend upon the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. A person that would be a U.S. Holder if it held our ordinary shares directly and that is a partner of a partnership holding our ordinary shares is urged to consult its own tax advisor.

 

Passive Foreign Investment Company

 

Based on our anticipated income and the composition of our income and assets, there is a significant risk that we will be a passive foreign investment company (“PFIC”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes at least until we start generating a substantial amount of active revenue. However, because PFIC status is a factual determination based on actual results for the entire taxable year, our U.S. counsel expresses no opinion with respect to our PFIC status. A non-U.S. entity treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes will generally be a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes for any taxable year after applying certain look-through rules with respect to the income and assets of subsidiaries if either:

 

at least 75% of its gross income for such year is passive income (such as interest income); or

 

at least 50% of the value of its assets (based on an average of the quarterly values of the assets) during such year is attributable to assets that produce passive income or are held for the production of passive income.

 

Passive income for this purpose generally includes dividends, interest, royalties, rents, gains from commodities and securities transactions, the excess of gains over losses from the disposition of assets which produce passive income, and includes amounts derived by reason of the temporary investment of funds raised in offerings of our shares.

 

For this purpose, we will be treated as owning our proportionate share of the assets and earning our proportionate share of the income of any other entity treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes in which we own, directly or indirectly, 25% or more (by value) of the stock.

 

A separate determination must be made after the close of each taxable year as to whether we were a PFIC for that year. Because the value of our assets for purposes of the PFIC test will generally be determined by reference to the market price of our ordinary shares, our PFIC status may depend in part on the market price of our ordinary shares, which may fluctuate significantly. In addition, there may be certain ambiguities in applying the PFIC test to us. No rulings from the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”), however, have been or will be sought with respect to our status as a PFIC.

 


If we are a PFIC for any taxable year during which you hold our ordinary shares, we generally will continue to be treated as a PFIC with respect to your investment in our ordinary shares for all succeeding years during which you hold our ordinary shares, unless we cease to be a PFIC and you make a “deemed sale” election with respect to our ordinary shares. If such election is made, you will be deemed to have sold our ordinary shares you hold at their fair market value on the last day of the last taxable year in which we were a PFIC, and any gain from such deemed sale would be subject to taxation under the excess distribution regime described below. After the deemed sale election, your ordinary shares with respect to which the deemed sale election was made will not be treated as shares in a PFIC unless we subsequently become a PFIC.

  

101

For each taxable year that we are treated as a PFIC with respect to you, you will be subject to special tax rules with respect to any “excess distribution” (as defined below) you receive and any gain you realize from a sale or other disposition (including a pledge) of our ordinary shares, unless you make a valid “mark-to-market” election as discussed below. Distributions you receive in a taxable year that are greater than 125% of the average annual distributions you received during the shorter of the three preceding taxable years or your holding period for our ordinary shares will be treated as an excess distribution. Under these special tax rules:

 

the excess distribution or gain will be allocated ratably over your holding period for our ordinary shares;

 

the amount allocated to the current taxable year, and any taxable years in your holding period prior to the first taxable year in which we were a PFIC, will be treated as ordinary income; and

 

the amount allocated to each other taxable year will be subject to the highest tax rate in effect for individuals or corporations, as applicable, for each such year and the interest charge generally applicable to underpayments of tax will be imposed on the resulting tax attributable to each such year.

 

The tax liability for amounts allocated to taxable years prior to the year of disposition or excess distribution cannot be offset by any net operating losses, and gains (but not losses) realized on the sale of our ordinary shares cannot be treated as capital gains, even if you hold our ordinary shares as capital assets.

 

If we are treated as a PFIC with respect to you for any taxable year, to the extent any of our subsidiaries are also PFICs, you may be deemed to own shares in such lower-tier PFICs that are directly or indirectly owned by us in that proportion which the value of our ordinary shares you own bears to the value of all of our ordinary shares, and you may be subject to the adverse tax consequences described above with respect to the shares of such lower-tier PFICs you would be deemed to own. As a result, you may incur liability for any excess distribution described above if we receive a distribution from our lower-tier PFICs or if any shares in such lower-tier PFICs are disposed of  (or deemed disposed of). You should consult your tax advisor regarding the application of the PFIC rules to any of our subsidiaries.

 

A U.S. Holder of “marketable stock” (as defined below) in a PFIC may make a mark-to-market election for such stock to elect out of the tax treatment discussed above. If you make a valid mark-to-market election for our ordinary shares, you will include in income for each year that we are treated as a PFIC with respect to you an amount equal to the excess, if any, of the fair market value of our ordinary shares as of the close of your taxable year over your adjusted basis in such ordinary shares. You will be allowed a deduction for the excess, if any, of the adjusted basis of our ordinary shares over their fair market value as of the close of the taxable year. However, deductions will be allowable only to the extent of any net mark-to-market gains on our ordinary shares included in your income for prior taxable years. Amounts included in your income under a mark-to-market election, as well as gain on the actual sale or other disposition of our ordinary shares, will be treated as ordinary income. Ordinary loss treatment will also apply to the deductible portion of any mark-to-market loss on our ordinary shares, as well as to any loss realized on the actual sale or disposition of our ordinary shares, to the extent the amount of such loss does not exceed the net mark-to-market gains for such ordinary shares previously included in income. Your basis in our ordinary shares will be adjusted to reflect any such income or loss amounts. If you make a mark-to-market election, any distributions we make would generally be subject to the rules discussed below under “— Taxation of dividends and other distributions on our ordinary shares,” except the lower rates applicable to qualified dividend income would not apply.

 


The mark-to-market election is available only for “marketable stock,” which is stock that is regularly traded on a qualified exchange or other market, as defined in applicable U.S. Treasury regulations. We expect our ordinary shares will be listed on NASDAQ.Nasdaq. Because a mark-to-market election cannot be made for equity interests in any lower-tier PFICs we own, you generally will continue to be subject to the PFIC rules with respect to your indirect interest in any investments held by us that are treated as an equity interest in a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The NASDAQNasdaq is a qualified exchange, but there can be no assurance that the trading in our ordinary shares will be sufficiently regular to qualify our ordinary shares as marketable stock. You should consult your tax advisor as to the availability and desirability of a mark-to-market election, as well as the impact of such election on interests in any lower-tier PFICs. Alternatively, if a non-U.S. entity treated as a corporation is a PFIC, a holder of shares in that entity may avoid taxation under the PFIC rules described above regarding excess distributions and recognized gains by making a “qualified electing fund” election to include in its income, on a current basis: (1) as ordinary income, its pro rata share of the “ordinary earnings” of the qualified electing fund; and (2) as long-term capital gain, its pro rata share of the “net capital gain” of the qualified electing fund. However, you may make a qualified electing fund election with respect to your ordinary shares only if we furnish you annually with certain tax information, and we currently do not intend to prepare or provide such information.

 

102

A U.S. Holder of a PFIC may be required to file an IRS Form 8621. The failure to file this form when required could result in substantial penalties. If we are a PFIC, you should consult your tax advisor regarding any reporting requirements that may apply to you. You are urged to consult your tax advisor regarding the application of the PFIC rules to the acquisition, ownership and disposition of our ordinary shares.

  

YOU ARE STRONGLY URGED TO CONSULT YOUR TAX ADVISOR REGARDING THE IMPACT OF OUR BEING A PFIC ON YOUR INVESTMENT IN OUR ORDINARY SHARES AS WELL AS THE APPLICATION OF THE PFIC RULES AND THE POSSIBILITY OF MAKING A MARK-TO-MARKET ELECTION.

 

Taxation of Dividends and Other Distributions on our Ordinary Shares

 

Subject to the PFIC rules discussed above, the gross amount of any distributions we make to you (including the amount of any tax withheld) with respect to our ordinary shares generally will be includible in your gross income as dividend income on the date of receipt by the holder, but only to the extent the distribution is paid out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits (as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles). The dividends will not be eligible for the dividends-received deduction allowed to corporations in respect of dividends received from other U.S. corporations. To the extent the amount of the distribution exceeds our current and accumulated earnings and profits (as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles), such excess amount will be treated first as a tax-free return of your tax basis in your ordinary shares, and then, to the extent such excess amount exceeds your tax basis in your ordinary shares, as capital gain. We currently do not, and we do not intend to, calculate our earnings and profits under U.S. federal income tax principles. Therefore, you should expect that a distribution will generally be reported as a dividend even if that distribution would otherwise be treated as a non-taxable return of capital or as capital gain under the rules described above.

 

With respect to certain non-corporate U.S. Holders, including individual U.S. Holders, dividends may be taxed at the lower capital gain rates applicable to “qualified dividend income,” provided (1) our ordinary shares are readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States (such as NASDAQ)Nasdaq), (2) we are neither a PFIC nor treated as such with respect to you (as discussed above) for either the taxable year in which the dividend was paid or the preceding taxable year, (3) certain holding period requirements are met and (4) you are not under an obligation to make related payments with respect to positions in substantially similar or related property. As discussed above under “Passive foreign investment company,” there is a significant risk that we will be a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and, as a result, the qualified dividend rate may be unavailable with respect to dividends we pay.

 

The amount of any distribution paid in a currency other than U.S. dollars will be equal to the U.S. dollar value of such currency on the date such distribution is includible in your income, regardless of whether the payment is in fact converted into U.S. dollars at that time. If the foreign currency is converted into U.S. dollars on the date of receipt, a U.S. Holder generally will not be required to recognize foreign currency gain or loss in respect of the distribution. A U.S. Holder may have foreign currency gain or loss if the foreign currency is converted into U.S. dollars after the date of receipt, depending on the exchange rate at the time of conversion. Any gains or losses resulting from the conversion of foreign currency into U.S. dollars generally will be treated as ordinary income or loss, as the case may be, and generally will be treated as U.S. source. In addition, proposed Treasury regulations (which taxpayers may rely upon pending publication of final regulations) issued on December 18, 2017, provide that certain taxpayers may elect to ‘mark to market’ gain or loss resulting from exchange rate fluctuations. The proposed regulations are complex, and you should consult your tax advisor regarding the availability of the proposed regulations in your particular circumstances. The amount of any distribution of property other than cash will be the fair market value of such property on the date of distribution.

 


Any dividends will constitute foreign source income for foreign tax credit limitation purposes. If the dividends are taxed as qualified dividend income (as discussed above), the amount of the dividend taken into account for purposes of calculating the foreign tax credit limitation will in general be limited to the gross amount of the dividend, multiplied by the reduced tax rate applicable to qualified dividend income and divided by the highest tax rate normally applicable to dividends. The limitation on foreign taxes eligible for credit is calculated separately with respect to specific classes of income. For this purpose, dividends distributed by us with respect to our ordinary shares will generally constitute “passive category income” but could, in the case of certain U.S. Holders, constitute “general category income.”

  

If Israeli withholding taxes apply to any dividends paid to you with respect to our ordinary shares, subject to certain conditions and limitations, such withholding taxes may be treated as foreign taxes eligible for credit against your U.S. federal income tax liability. Instead of claiming a credit, you may elect to deduct such taxes in computing taxable income, subject to applicable limitations. If a refund of the tax withheld is available under the applicable laws of Israel or under the Israel-U.S. income tax treaty (the “Treaty”), the amount of tax withheld that is refundable will not be eligible for such credit against your U.S. federal income tax liability (and will not be eligible for the deduction against your U.S. federal taxable income). The rules relating to the determination of the foreign tax credit are complex, and you should consult your tax advisor regarding the availability of a foreign tax credit in your particular circumstances, including the effects of the Treaty.

 

103

Taxation of Disposition of Ordinary Shares

 

Subject to the PFIC rules discussed above, upon a sale or other disposition of ordinary shares, you will generally recognize capital gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes in an amount equal to the difference between the amount realized (including the amount of any tax withheld) and your tax basis in such ordinary shares. If the consideration you receive for our ordinary shares is not paid in U.S. dollars, the amount realized will be the U.S. dollar value of the payment received determined by reference to the spot rate of exchange on the date of the sale or other disposition. However, if our ordinary shares are treated as traded on an “established securities market” and you are either a cash basis taxpayer or an accrual basis taxpayer that has made a special election (which must be applied consistently from year to year and cannot be changed without the consent of the IRS), you will determine the U.S. dollar value of the amount realized in a non-U.S. dollar currency by translating the amount received at the spot rate of exchange on the settlement date of the sale. If you are an accrual basis taxpayer that is not eligible to or does not elect to determine the amount realized using the spot rate on the settlement date, you will recognize foreign currency gain or loss to the extent of any difference between the U.S. dollar amount realized on the date of sale or disposition and the U.S. dollar value of the currency received at the spot rate on the settlement date. In addition, proposed Treasury regulations (which taxpayers may rely upon pending publication of final regulations) issued on December 18, 2017 provide that certain taxpayers may elect to ‘mark to market’ gain or loss resulting from exchange rate fluctuations. The proposed regulations are complex, and you should consult your tax advisor regarding the availability of the proposed regulations in your particular circumstances.

 

Your tax basis in our ordinary shares generally will equal the cost of such ordinary shares. If you are a non-corporate U.S. Holder, capital gain from the sale, exchange or other disposition of shares is generally eligible for a preferential rate of taxation applicable to capital gains, if your holding period determined at the time of such sale, exchange or other disposition for such shares exceeds one year (i.e., such gain is long-term capital gain). The deductibility of capital losses is subject to significant limitations.

 

As mentioned above, to the extent that, the sale, exchange or disposition of our ordinary shares would be subject to Israeli tax, the U.S holder would be permitted to claim a credit for any such taxes incurred against U.S. federal income tax imposed on any gain from such sale, exchange or disposition, under the circumstances and subject to the limitations specified in the U.S-Israel Double Tax Treaty and U.S. domestic law applicable to foreign tax credit.

 


Information Reporting and Backup Withholding

 

Dividend payments with respect to ordinary shares and proceeds from the sale, exchange or redemption of ordinary shares may be subject to information reporting to the IRS and possible U.S. backup withholding. Backup withholding will not apply, however, to a U.S. Holder that furnishes a correct taxpayer identification number and makes any other required certification or that is otherwise exempt from backup withholding. U.S. Holders that are required to establish their exempt status generally must provide such certification on IRS Form W-9. You should consult your tax advisor regarding the application of the U.S. information reporting and backup withholding rules.

 

Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Amounts withheld as backup withholding may be credited against your U.S. federal income tax liability, and you may obtain a refund of any excess amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules by filing the appropriate claim for refund with the IRS and furnishing any required information in a timely manner.

 

Information with respect to Foreign Financial Assets

 

Certain U.S. Holders may be required to report information relating to an interest in our ordinary shares, subject to certain exceptions (including an exception for ordinary shares held in accounts maintained by certain U.S. financial institutions). Penalties can apply if U.S. Holders fail to satisfy such reporting requirements. You should consult your tax advisor regarding the effect, if any, of this requirement on your ownership and disposition of our ordinary shares.

  

Information with respect to the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act

 

The Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act, or FATCA, encourages foreign financial institutions to report information about their U.S. account holders (including holders of certain equity interests) to the IRS. Foreign financial institutions that fail to comply with the withholding and reporting requirements of FATCA and certain account holders that do not provide sufficient information under the requirements of FATCA are subject to a 30% U.S. withholding tax on certain payments they receive, including foreign pass-through payments (which may include payments made by us with respect to our shares). The term “foreign pass thru payment” is not currently defined in U.S. Treasury Regulations, and therefore, the future application of FATCA withholding tax on foreign pass-thru payments to holders of shares is uncertain. If a holder of shares is subject to withholding, there will be no additional amounts payable by way of compensation to the holder of such securities for the deducted amount. Holders of shares should consult their own tax advisors regarding this legislation in light of such holder’s particular situation.

 

Information with respect to Net Investment Income Tax

 

Certain U.S. Holders who are individuals, estates or trusts may be required to pay an additional 3.8% Net Investment Income Tax, or NIIT, on, among other things, dividends and capital gains from the sale or other disposition of our shares. For individuals, the additional NIIT tax applies to the lesser of (i) “net investment income” or (ii) the excess of “modified adjusted gross income” over $200,000 ($250,000 if married and filing jointly or $125,000 if married and filing separately). “Net investment income” generally equals the taxpayer’s gross investment income reduced by the deductions that are allocable to such income. U.S. Holders will likely not be able to credit foreign taxes against the 3.8% NIIT.

  

104

Information with respect to Reporting Requirements

 

Certain U.S. Holders owning “specified foreign financial assets” may be required to file IRS Form 8938, or Statement of Specified Foreign Financial Assets, with respect to such assets with their tax returns. “Specified foreign financial assets” generally include any financial accounts maintained by foreign financial institutions, as well as any of the following, but only if they are not held in accounts maintained by financial institutions: (i) stocks and securities issued by non-U.S. persons (ii) financial instruments and contracts held for investment that have non-U.S. issuers or counterparties and (iii) interests in foreign entities. The IRS has issued guidance exempting “specified foreign financial assets” held in a financial account from reporting under this provision (although the financial account itself, if maintained by a foreign financial institution, may remain subject to this reporting requirement). The failure to file this form when required could result in substantial penalties. You are urged to consult your tax advisors regarding the application of these requirements to your ownership of our shares.

 


In addition, certain U.S. Holders may be required to report additional information relating to an interest in our ordinary shares, subject to certain exceptions. You are urged to consult your tax advisors regarding your information reporting obligations, if any, with respect to your ownership and disposition of our ordinary shares.

 

THE SUMMARY OF U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES SET OUT ABOVE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. INVESTORS ARE URGED TO CONSULT THEIR TAX ADVISORS ABOUT THE APPLICATION OF THE U.S. FEDERAL TAX RULES TO THEIR PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES AS WELL AS THE STATE, LOCAL, NON-U.S. AND OTHER TAX CONSEQUENCES TO THEM OF THE PURCHASE, OWNERSHIP AND DISPOSITION OF OUR ORDINARY SHARES.

 

B.Dividends and Paying Agents

 

Not applicable.

 

C.Statement by Experts

 

Not applicable.

 

D.Documents on Display

 

We are subject to the informational requirements of the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and in accordance therewith file annual and special reports with, and furnish other information to, the SEC. You may read and copy this annual report on Form 20-F, including the registration statement and any other documents we have filed at the SEC, including anyrelated exhibits and schedules, at the SEC’s public reference room at 100 F Street N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. You may calland any document we file with the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on this public reference room. In addition, the SEC maintains a web site that contains reports and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. You may accessthrough the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. These SEC filings are also available to the public on the Israel Securities Authority’s Magna website at www.magna.isa.gov.il and from commercial document retrieval services.

 

As a foreign private issuer, we will beare exempt from the rules under the Exchange Act related to the furnishing and content of proxy statements, and our officers, directors and principal shareholders will beare exempt from the reporting and short-swing profit recovery provisions contained in Section 16 of the Exchange Act. Furthermore, as a foreign private issuer, we are also not subject to the requirements of Regulation FD (Fair Disclosure) promulgated under the Exchange Act. In addition, we willare not be required under the Exchange Act to file annual quarterlyor other reports and current reports andconsolidated financial statements with the SEC as frequently or as promptly as United StatesU.S. companies whose securities are registered under the Exchange Act. However,Instead, we will be required to complymust file with the informational requirementsSEC, within 120 days after the end of each fiscal year, or such other applicable time as required by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, applicable to foreign private issuers, and, accordingly, will file current reports on Form 6-K,SEC, an annual reportsreport on Form 20-F andcontaining consolidated financial statements audited by an independent registered public accounting firm. We also intend to furnish certain other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

In addition, because our ordinary shares are traded on the TASE, prior to our listing on Nasdaq we have filed Hebrew language periodic and immediate reports with, and furnishmaterial information to the TASE and the ISA, as requiredSEC under Chapter Sixcover of the Israeli Securities Law, 5768-1968. Copies of our filings with the ISA can be retrieved electronically through the MAGNA distribution site of the ISA (www.magna.isa.gov.il) and the TASE website (www.maya.isa.gov.il). Form 6-K.

We maintain a corporate website at www.medigus.com. Information contained on, or that can be accessed through, our website does not constitute a part of this annual report on Form 20-F. We have included our website address in this annual report on Form 20-F solely as an inactive textual reference.

 

E.Subsidiary Information

 

Not applicable.

 


ITEM 11.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

 

Market risk is the risk of loss related to changes in market prices, including interest rates and foreign exchange rates, of financial instruments that may adversely impact our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

105

Risk of Interest Rate Fluctuation

 

Currently, our investments consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents and short-term bank deposits. We follow an investment policy that was set by the investment committee of our board of directors, pursuant to which we currently invest in tradable short term Israeli government loans or bank deposits. Our investments are exposed to market risk due to fluctuation in interest rates, which may affect our interest income and the fair market value of our investments. However, given the low levels of interest rates worldwide, our interest income is not material and a further reduction in interest rates would not cause us a significant reduction in the absolute amounts of interest income to us. We manage this exposure by performing ongoing evaluations of our investments. Due to the short-term maturities of our investments to date, their carrying value has always approximated their fair value. It is be our current policy to hold investments to maturity in order to limit our exposure to interest rate fluctuations.

 

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk

 

Our reporting and functional currency is the U.S. dollar. Our revenues are currently primarily payable in U.S. dollars and Euros and we expect our future revenues to be denominated primarily in U.S. dollars and Euros. However, certain amount of our expenses are in NIS and as a result, we are exposed to the currency fluctuation risks relating to the recording of our expenses in U.S. dollars. We may, in the future, decide to enter into currency hedging transactions. These measures, however, may not adequately protect us from material adverse effects.

 

To date, we have not engaged in hedging transactions, however we hold our investments in both NIS and US dollars. In the future, we may enter into currency hedging transactions to decrease the risk of financial exposure from fluctuations in the exchange rates of our principal operating currencies. These measures, however, may not adequately protect us from the material adverse effects of such fluctuations.

 

Our interest rate risk exposure is in respect to bank deposits, which expose us to risk due to change in fair value interest rates. As of December 31, 2017,2019, these deposits carried relatively low interest rates and under these low interest rates, reasonable changes in interest rates are expected have negligible impact on the fair value of these assets.

  

ITEM 12.DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES

 

A.Debt Securities.

 

Not applicable.

 

B.Warrants and rights.

 

Not applicable.

 

C.Other Securities.

 

Not applicable.

 

D.American Depositary Shares

 

General

 

The following is a summary description of the ADSs and does not purport to be complete. Each ADS represents 5020 ordinary shares (or a right to receive 5020 ordinary shares) deposited with the principal Tel Aviv office of either of Bank Hapoalim or Bank Leumi, as custodian for the Bank of New York Mellon as the Depositary. Each ADS also represents any other securities, cash or other property which may be held by the Depositary. The Depositary’s office at which the ADSs will be administered is located at 101 Barclay Street, New York, New York 10286.

106

 

You may hold ADSs either (A) directly (i) by having an American Depositary Receipt, or ADR, which is a certificate evidencing a specific number of ADSs, registered in your name, or (ii) by having uncertificated ADSs registered in your name, or (B) indirectly by holding a security entitlement in ADSs through your broker or other financial institution. If you hold ADSs directly, you are a registered ADS holder, also referred to as an ADS holder. This description assumes you are an ADS holder. If you hold the ADSs indirectly, you must rely on the procedures of your broker or other financial institution to assert the rights of ADS holders described in this section. You should consult with your broker or financial institution to find out what those procedures are.

 


Registered holders of uncertificated ADSs will receive statements from the Depositary confirming their holdings. As an ADS holder, we will not treat you as one of our shareholders and you will not have shareholder rights. Israeli law governs shareholder rights. The Depositary will be the holder of the shares underlying your ADSs. As a registered holder of ADSs, you will have ADS holder rights. A deposit agreement among us, the Depositary, ADS holders and all other persons indirectly or beneficially holding ADSs sets out ADS holder rights as well as the rights and obligations of the Depositary. New York law governs the deposit agreement and the ADSs.

 

The following is a summary of the material provisions of the deposit agreement. For more complete information, you should read the entire deposit agreement and the form of ADR.

 

Dividends and Other Distributions

 

How will you receive dividends and other distributions on the shares?

 

The Depositary has agreed to pay to ADS holders the cash dividends or other distributions it or the custodian receives on shares or other deposited securities, after deducting its fees and expenses. You will receive these distributions in proportion to the number of shares your ADSs represent.

 

Cash. The Depositary will convert any cash dividend or other cash distribution we pay on the shares into U.S. dollars, if it can do so on a reasonable basis and can transfer the U.S. dollars to the United States. If that is not possible or if any government approval is needed and cannot be obtained, the deposit agreement allows the Depositary to distribute the NIS only to those ADS holders to whom it is possible to do so. It will hold the NIS it cannot convert for the account of the ADS holders who have not been paid. It will not invest the NIS and it will not be liable for any interest.

 

Before making a distribution, any withholding taxes, or other governmental charges that must be paid will be deducted. For more information see “Item 10. Addition Information—E. Taxation.” The Depositary will distribute only whole U.S. dollars and cents and will round fractional cents to the nearest whole cent.If the exchange rates fluctuate during a time when the Depositary cannot convert the NIS, you may lose some or all of the value of the distribution.

 

Shares.The Depositary may distribute additional ADSs representing any shares we distribute as a dividend or free distribution. The Depositary will only distribute whole ADSs. It will sell shares which would require it to deliver a fraction of an ADS (or ADSs representing those shares) and distribute the net proceeds in the same way as it does with cash. If the Depositary does not distribute additional ADSs, the outstanding ADSs will also represent the new shares. The Depositary may sell a portion of the distributed shares sufficient to pay its fees and expenses in connection with that distribution (or ADSs representing those shares).

 

Rights to purchase additional shares.If we offer holders of our securities any rights to subscribe for additional ordinary shares or any other rights, the Depositary may make these rights available to ADS holders. If the Depositary decides it is not legal and practical to make the rights available but that it is practical to sell the rights, the Depositary will use reasonable efforts to sell the rights and distribute the proceeds in the same way as it does with cash. The Depositary will allow rights that are not distributed or sold to lapse.In that case, you will receive no value for them.

 

If the Depositary makes rights available to ADS holders, it will exercise the rights and purchase the shares on your behalf. The Depositary will then deposit the shares and deliver ADSs to the persons entitled to them. It will only exercise rights if you pay it the exercise price and any other charges the rights require you to pay.

107

 

U.S. securities laws may restrict transfers and cancellation of the ADSs represented by shares purchased upon exercise of rights. For example, you may not be able to trade these ADSs freely in the United States. In this case, the Depositary may deliver restricted depositary shares that have the same terms as the ADSs described in this section except for changes needed to put the necessary restrictions in place.

 


Other Distributions.The Depositary will send to ADS holders anything else we distribute on deposited securities by any means it thinks is legal, fair and practical. If it cannot make the distribution in that way, the Depositary has a choice. It may decide to sell what we distributed and distribute the net proceeds, in the same way as it does with cash. Or, it may decide to hold what we distributed, in which case ADSs will also represent the newly distributed property. However, the Depositary is not required to distribute any securities (other than ADSs) to ADS holders unless it receives satisfactory evidence from us that it is legal to make that distribution. The Depositary may sell a portion of the distributed securities or property sufficient to pay its fees and expenses in connection with that distribution. 

 

The Depositary is not responsible if it decides that it is unlawful or impractical to make a distribution available to any ADS holders. We have no obligation to register ADSs, shares, rights or other securities under the Securities Act. We also have no obligation to take any other action to permit the distribution of ADSs, shares, rights or anything else to ADS holders.This means that you may not receive the distributions we make on our shares or any value for them if it is illegal or impractical for us to make them available to you.

 

Deposit, Withdrawal and Cancellation

 

How are ADSs issued?

 

The Depositary will deliver ADSs if you or your broker deposits shares or evidence of rights to receive shares with the custodian. Upon payment of its fees and expenses and of any taxes or charges, such as stamp taxes or stock transfer taxes or fees, the Depositary will register the appropriate number of ADSs in the names you request and will deliver the ADSs to or upon the order of the person or persons that made the deposit.

 

How can ADS holders withdraw the deposited securities?

 

You may surrender your ADSs at the Depositary’s office. Upon payment of its fees and expenses and of any taxes or charges, such as stamp taxes or stock transfer taxes or fees, the Depositary will deliver the shares and any other deposited securities underlying the ADSs to the ADS holder or a person the ADS holder designates at the office of the custodian. Or, at your request, risk and expense, the Depositary will deliver the deposited securities at its office, if feasible.

 

How do ADS holders interchange between certificated ADSs and uncertificated ADSs?

 

You may surrender your ADR to the Depositary for the purpose of exchanging your ADR for uncertificated ADSs. The Depositary will cancel that ADR and will send to the ADS holder a statement confirming that the ADS holder is the registered holder of uncertificated ADSs. Alternatively, upon receipt by the Depositary of a proper instruction from a registered holder of uncertificated ADSs requesting the exchange of uncertificated ADSs for certificated ADSs, the Depositary will execute and deliver to the ADS holder an ADR evidencing those ADSs.

 

Voting Rights

 

How do you vote?

 

ADS holders may instruct the Depositary how to vote the number of deposited shares their ADSs represent. The Depositary will notify ADS holders of shareholders’ meetings and arrange to deliver our voting materials to them if we ask it to. Those materials will describe the matters to be voted on and explain how ADS holders may instruct the Depositary how to vote. For instructions to be valid, they much reach the Depositary by a date set by the Depositary.Otherwise, you won’t be able to exercise your right to vote unless you withdraw the shares. However, you may not know about the meeting enough in advance to withdraw the shares.

108

 

The Depositary will try, as far as practical, subject to the laws of Israel, and of our articles of association or similar documents, to vote or to have its agents vote the shares or other deposited securities as instructed by ADS holders. The Depositary will only vote or attempt to vote as instructed.

 


We cannot assure you that you will receive the voting materials in time to ensure that you can instruct the Depositary to vote your shares. In addition, the Depositary and its agents are not responsible for failing to carry out voting instructions or for the manner of carrying out voting instructions.This means that you may not be able to exercise your right to vote and there may be nothing you can do if your shares are not voted as you requested.

 

In order to give you a reasonable opportunity to instruct the Depositary as to the exercise of voting rights relating to deposited securities, if we request the Depositary to act, we agree to give the Depositary notice of any such meeting and details concerning the matters to be voted upon at least 30 days in advance of the meeting date.

 

Each of our American Depositary Shares, or ADSs, represents 50 of our ordinary shares. The ADSs trade on the NASDAQNasdaq Capital Market.

 

The form of the deposit agreement for the ADSs and the form of American Depositary Receipt (ADR) that represents an ADS as filed as exhibits to the Company’s registration statement on Form F-6 with the SEC on May 7, 2015. Copies of the deposit agreement are available for inspection at the principal office of the Bank of New York Mellon, located at 101 Barclay Street, New York, New York 10286, and at the principal office of our custodianscustodian Bank Hapoalim B.M., 104 Hayarkon Street, Tel Aviv 63432, Israel. 

 

Fees and Expenses

 

Persons depositing or withdrawing shares or ADS
holders must pay
:
 For:
$5.00 (or less) per 100 ADSs (or portion of 100 ADSs) Issuance of ADSs, including issuances resulting from a distribution of shares or rights or other property
  Cancellation of ADSs for the purpose of withdrawal, including if the deposit agreement terminates
$0.05 (or less) per ADS Any cash distribution to ADS holders
A fee equivalent to the fee that would be payable if securities distributed to you had been shares and the shares had been deposited for issuance of ADSs Distribution of securities distributed to holders of deposited securities which are distributed by the Depositary to ADS holders
$0.05 (or less) per ADS per calendar year Depositary services
Registration or transfer fees Transfer and registration of shares on our share register to or from the name of the Depositary or its agent when you deposit or withdraw shares
Expenses of the Depositary Cable, telex and facsimile transmissions (when expressly provided in the deposit agreement)
  converting foreign currency to U.S. dollars
Taxes and other governmental charges the Depositary or the custodian has to pay on any ADSs or shares underlying ADSs, such as stock transfer taxes, stamp duty or withholding taxes 

As necessary

Any charges incurred by the depositary or its agents for servicing the deposited securities As necessary

 

The Depositary collects its fees for delivery and surrender of ADSs directly from investors depositing shares or surrendering ADSs for the purpose of withdrawal or from intermediaries acting for them. The Depositary collects fees for making distributions to investors by deducting those fees from the amounts distributed or by selling a portion of distributable property to pay the fees. The Depositary may collect its annual fee for depositary services by deduction from cash distributions or by directly billing investors or by charging the book-entry system accounts of participants acting for them. The Depositary may collect any of its fees by deduction from any cash distribution payable to ADS holders that are obligated to pay those fees. The Depositary may generally refuse to provide fee-attracting services until its fees for those services are paid.

 

109

From time to time, the Depositary may make payments to us to reimburse and/or share revenue from the fees collected from ADS holders, or waive fees and expenses for services provided, generally relating to costs and expenses arising out of establishment and maintenance of the ADS program. In performing its duties under the deposit agreement, the Depositary may use brokers, dealers or other service providers that are affiliates of the Depositary and that may earn or share fees or commissions.

 

107

Payment of Taxes

 

You will be responsible for any taxes or other governmental charges payable on your ADSs or on the deposited securities represented by any of your ADSs. The Depositary may refuse to register any transfer of your ADSs or allow you to withdraw the deposited securities represented by your ADSs until such taxes or other charges are paid. It may apply payments owed to you or sell deposited securities represented by your ADSs to pay any taxes owed and you will remain liable for any deficiency. If the Depositary sells deposited securities, it will, if appropriate, reduce the number of ADSs to reflect the sale and pay to ADS holders any proceeds, or send to ADS holders any property, remaining after it has paid the taxes. 

 

Reclassifications, Recapitalizations and Mergers

 

If we: Then:

●  Change the nominal or par value of our shares

●  Reclassify, split up or consolidate any of the deposited securities

●  Distribute securities on the shares that are not distributed to you

●  Recapitalize, reorganize, merge, liquidate, sell all or

substantially all of our assets, or take any similar action

 

The cash, shares or other securities received by the Depositary will become deposited securities. Each ADS will automatically represent its equal share of the new deposited securities.

The Depositary may distribute new ADSs representing the new deposited securities or ask you to surrender your outstanding ADRs in exchange for new ADRs identifying the new deposited securities.

 

Amendment and Termination

 

How may the deposit agreement be amended? 

 

We may agree with the Depositary to amend the deposit agreement and the ADRs without your consent for any reason. If an amendment adds or increases fees or charges, except for taxes and other governmental charges or expenses of the Depositary for registration fees, facsimile costs, delivery charges or similar items, or prejudices a substantial right of ADS holders, it will not become effective for outstanding ADSs until 30 days after the Depositary notifies ADS holders of the amendment.At the time an amendment becomes effective, you are considered, by continuing to hold your ADSs, to agree to the amendment and to be bound by the ADRs and the deposit agreement as amended

 

How may the deposit agreement be terminated?

 

The Depositary will terminate the deposit agreement at our direction by mailing notice of termination to the ADS holders then outstanding at least 30 days prior to the date fixed in such notice for such termination. The Depositary may also terminate the deposit agreement by mailing notice of termination to us and the ADS holders if 60 days have passed since the Depositary told us it wants to resign but a successor depositary has not been appointed and accepted its appointment.

 

After termination, the Depositary and its agents will do the following under the deposit agreement but nothing else: collect distributions on the deposited securities, sell rights and other property, and deliver shares and other deposited securities upon cancellation of ADSs. Four months after termination, the Depositary may sell any remaining deposited securities by public or private sale. After that, the Depositary will hold the money it received on the sale, as well as any other cash it is holding under the deposit agreement for the pro rata benefit of the ADS holders that have not surrendered their ADSs. It will not invest the money and has no liability for interest. The Depositary’s only obligations will be to account for the money and other cash. After termination our only obligations will be to indemnify the Depositary and to pay fees and expenses of the Depositary that we agreed to pay.

 

110

Limitations on Obligations and Liability

 

Limits on our Obligations and the Obligations of the Depositary; Limits on Liability to Holders of ADSs

 

The deposit agreement expressly limits our obligations and the obligations of the Depositary. It also limits our liability and the liability of the Depositary. We and the Depositary: 

 

are only obligated to take the actions specifically set forth in the deposit agreement without negligence or bad faith;

                 

are not liable if we are or it is prevented or delayed by law or circumstances beyond our or its control from performing our or its obligations under the deposit agreement;

                 

are not liable if we or it exercises discretion permitted under the deposit agreement;

                 

are not liable for the inability of any holder of ADSs to benefit from any distribution on deposited securities that is not made available to holders of ADSs under the terms of the deposit agreement, or for any special, consequential or punitive damages for any breach of the terms of the deposit agreement;

                 

have no obligation to become involved in a lawsuit or other proceeding related to the ADSs or the deposit agreement on your behalf or on behalf of any other person;

                 

are not liable for the acts or omissions of any securities depository, clearing agency or settlement system; and

                 

may rely upon any documents we believe or it believes in good faith to be genuine and to have been signed or presented by the proper person.

 

In the deposit agreement, we and the Depositary agree to indemnify each other under certain circumstances.

 

Requirements for Depositary Actions

 

Before the Depositary will deliver or register a transfer of ADSs, make a distribution on ADSs, or permit withdrawal of shares, the Depositary may require: 

 

payment of stock transfer or other taxes or other governmental charges and transfer or registration fees charged by third parties for the transfer of any shares or other deposited securities;

                 

satisfactory proof of the identity and genuineness of any signature or other information it deems necessary; and

                 

compliance with regulations it may establish, from time to time, consistent with the deposit agreement, including presentation of transfer documents.

 

The Depositary may refuse to deliver ADSs or register transfers of ADSs when the transfer books of the Depositary or our transfer books are closed or at any time if the Depositary or we think it advisable to do so.

 

111

Right to Receive the Shares Underlying your ADSs

 

ADS holders have the right to cancel their ADSs and withdraw the underlying shares at any time except:

 

when temporary delays arise because: (i) the Depositary has closed its transfer books or we have closed our transfer books; (ii) the transfer of shares is blocked to permit voting at a shareholders’ meeting; or (iii) we are paying a dividend on our shares;

                 

when you owe money to pay fees, taxes and similar charges; or

                 

when it is necessary to prohibit withdrawals in order to comply with any laws or governmental regulations that apply to ADSs or to the withdrawal of shares or other deposited securities.

 

This right of withdrawal may not be limited by any other provision of the deposit agreement.

 


Pre-release of ADSs

 

The deposit agreement permits the Depositary to deliver ADSs before deposit of the underlying shares. This is called a pre-release of the ADSs. The Depositary may also deliver shares upon cancellation of pre-released ADSs (even if the ADSs are canceled before the pre-release transaction has been closed out). A pre-release is closed out as soon as the underlying shares are delivered to the Depositary. The Depositary may receive ADSs instead of shares to close out a pre-release. The Depositary may pre-release ADSs only under the following conditions: (1) before or at the time of the pre-release, the person to whom the pre-release is being made represents to the Depositary in writing that it or its customer owns the shares or ADSs to be deposited; (2) the pre-release is fully collateralized with cash or other collateral that the Depositary considers appropriate; and (3) the Depositary must be able to close out the pre-release on not more than five business days’ notice. In addition, the Depositary will limit the number of ADSs that may be outstanding at any time as a result of pre-release, although the Depositary may disregard the limit from time to time if it thinks it is appropriate to do so.

 

Direct Registration System

 

In the deposit agreement, all parties to the deposit agreement acknowledge that the Direct Registration System, or DRS, and Profile Modification System, or Profile, will apply to uncertificated ADSs upon acceptance thereof to DRS by the Depository Trust Company, or DTC. DRS is the system administered by DTC that facilitates interchange between registered holding of uncertificated ADSs and holding of security entitlements in ADSs through DTC and a DTC participant. Profile is a required feature of DRS that allows a DTC participant, claiming to act on behalf of a registered holder of ADSs, to direct the Depositary to register a transfer of those ADSs to DTC or its nominee and to deliver those ADSs to the DTC account of that DTC participant without receipt by the Depositary of prior authorization from the ADS holder to register that transfer.

 

In connection with and in accordance with the arrangements and procedures relating to DRS/Profile, the parties to the deposit agreement understand that the Depositary will not determine whether the DTC participant that is claiming to be acting on behalf of an ADS holder in requesting registration of transfer and delivery described in the paragraph above has the actual authority to act on behalf of the ADS holder (notwithstanding any requirements under the Uniform Commercial Code). In the deposit agreement, the parties agree that the Depositary’s reliance on and compliance with instructions received by the Depositary through the DRS/Profile System and in accordance with the deposit agreement will not constitute negligence or bad faith on the part of the Depositary.

 

Shareholder communications; inspection of register of holders of ADSs

 

The Depositary will make available for your inspection at its office all communications that it receives from us as a holder of deposited securities that we make generally available to holders of deposited securities. The Depositary will send you copies of those communications if we ask it to. You have a right to inspect the register of holders of ADSs, but not for the purpose of contacting those holders about a matter unrelated to our business or the ADSs.

 

112

110

 

PART II

 

ITEM 13.DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES

 

There are no defaults, dividend arrangements or delinquencies that are required to be disclosed.

 

ITEM 14.MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS

 

Not applicable.

 

ITEM 15.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

 

(a) Disclosure controls and procedures

 

We performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed on Form 20-F and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is recorded, processed, summarized and reported timely within the time period specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. There can be no assurance that our disclosure controls and procedures will detect or uncover all failures of persons within the company to disclose information otherwise required to be set forth in our reports. Nevertheless, our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives.

Based on our evaluation, our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15(d) - 15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of the end of the period covered by this annual report on Form 20-F arewere not effective at such reasonable assurance level.level, due to the material weakness discussed below.

 

(b) Management report on internal control over financial reporting

 

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Based on the framework in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013 framework) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, our management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2017.2019 was not effective due to the material weakness described below.

In connection with the preparation of our consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019, we have identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting in relation to complex accounting matters, including for the reverse recapitalization transaction conducted with regard to ScoutCam Ltd. which was accounted for in our consolidated financial statements as a transaction with non-controlling interest. The cause of this material weakness was due to the complexities of the accounting treatment, which required additional qualified accounting personnel with an appropriate level of experience, and additional controls in the period-end financial reporting process commensurate with the complexity of the matters. Accordingly, we have determined that this control deficiency constituted a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting. A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our consolidated financial statements would not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. This deficiency could result in additional misstatements to our consolidated financial statements that would be material and would not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

We are evaluating and implementing additional procedures in order to remediate this material weakness, however, we cannot assure you that these or other measures will fully remediate the material weakness in a timely manner.

111

 

(c) Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

Not applicable.

 

(c)(d) Changes in internal control over financial reporting

 

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the year ended December 31, 2017,period covered by this annual report on Form 20-F that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

ITEM 16A.AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT

 

Our board of directors has determined that each of Mr. Birger, Mr. Machover and Mr. YanaiEliyahu Yoresh qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” and that all of them arehe is considered independent under the applicable SEC and Nasdaq Marketplace rules.

 

113

ITEM 16B.CODE OF ETHICS

 

In March 2016, we adopted a code of ethics and business conduct, which applies to all our directors, officers and employees, including without limitation our, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and controller, or persons performing similar functions. This code of ethics is posted on our website, www.medigus.com.

 

ITEM 16C.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

 

Fees and services

 

The table below summarizes the total amounts that we were billed by our independent accountants, Kesselman & Kesselman, an independent registered public accounting firm, a member firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited,, related to the following periods.

 

 Year Ended
December 31,
2017
  Year Ended
December 31,
2016
  Year Ended
December 31,
2019
 Year Ended
December 31,
2018
 
 (USD in thousands)  (USD in thousands) 
Audit fees(1)  160   128          65*      144 
Tax Fees(2)  33   10   6  20 
Total  193   138   71  164 

 

(1)Includes professional services rendered in connection with the audit of our annual financial statements and the review of our interim financial statements. Includes professional fees related to annual tax returns.This category also includes services that generally the independent accountant provides, such as consents and assistance with and review of documents filed with the SEC.
(2)Represents fees paidfor professional services rendered by our independent registered public accounting firm for tax consulting services.compliance and tax advice on actual or contemplated transactions.
*In addition to the amount mentioned above, the total audit fee amounts that ScoutCam Inc. was billed by its independent accountants, Kesselman & Kesselman, an independent registered public accounting firm, a member firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited, related to the year ended December 31, 2019 was USD 160,250.

 

Audit committee’s pre-approval policies and procedures

 

Our audit committee’s specific responsibilities in carrying out its oversight of the quality and integrity of the accounting, auditing and reporting practices of the Company include the approval of audit and non-audit services to be provided by the external auditor. The audit committee approves in advance the particular services or categories of services to be provided to the Company during the following yearly period and also sets forth a specific budget for such audit and non-audit services. Additional non-audit services may be pre-approved by the audit committee.

 


ITEM 16D.EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES

 

None.

 

ITEM 16E.PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS

 

Not applicable.

 

ITEM 16F.CHANGE IN REGISTRANT’S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT

 

Not applicable.

 

114

ITEM 16G.CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

Nasdaq Stock Market Listing Rules and Home Country Practices

 

As a foreign private issuer, we are permitted to follow Israeli corporate governance practices instead of Nasdaq Marketplace rules, provided that we disclose which requirements we are not following and the equivalent Israeli requirement. We rely on this “foreign private issuer exemption” with respect to the following items:

 

Quorum. While the Marketplace Rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market require that the quorum for purposes of any meeting of the holders of a listed company’s common voting stock, as specified in the company’s bylaws, be no less than 33 1/3% of the company’s outstanding common voting stock, under Israeli law, a company is entitled to determine in its articles of association the number of shareholders and percentage of holdings required for a quorum at a shareholders meeting. Our Articles of Association provide that a quorum of two or more shareholders holding at least 10% of the voting rights in person or by proxy is required for commencement of business at a general meeting. However, the quorum set forth in our Articles of Association with respect to an adjourned meeting consists of any number of shareholders present in person or by proxy.

 

Approval of Related Party Transactions. All related party transactions are approved in accordance with the requirements and procedures for approval of interested party acts and transactions, set forth in sections 268 to 275 of the Companies Law, and the regulations promulgated thereunder, which require the approval of the audit committee, the compensation committee, the board of directors and shareholders, as may be applicable, for specified transactions, rather than approval by the audit committee or other independent body of our board of directors as required under the MarketplaceListing Rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market.

 

Equity Compensation Plans. We do not necessarily seek shareholder approval for the establishment of, and amendments to, stock option or equity compensation plans (as set forth in NASDAQNasdaq Listing Rule 5635(c)), as such matters are not subject to shareholder approval under Israeli law. We will attempt to seek shareholder approval for our stock option or equity compensation plans (and the relevant annexes thereto) to the extent required in order to ensure they are tax qualified for our employees in the United States. However, even if such approval is not received, then the stock option or equity compensation plans will continue to be in effect, but we will not be able to grant options to our U.S. employees that qualify as Incentive Stock Options for U.S. federal tax purpose. Our stock option or other equity compensation plans are also available to our non-U.S. employees, and provide features necessary to comply with applicable non-U.S. tax laws.

 

Otherwise, we comply with the rules generally applicable to U.S. domestic companies listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market. We may in the future decide to use the foreign private issuer exemption with respect to some or all of the other Nasdaq Marketplace Rules related to corporate governance. We also comply with Israeli corporate governance requirements under the Israeli Companies Law applicable to public companies.

 

ITEM 16H.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE

 

Not applicable.

 

115

PART III

 

ITEM 17.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Not applicable.

 

ITEM 18.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

The consolidated financial statements and the related notes required by this Item are included in this annual report on Form 20-F beginning on page F-1.


Description: O:\EDGAR FILES\1-PreSub\f20f2018_medigusltd\img_001.jpg116

MEDIGUS LTD. 

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

To the board of directors and shareholders of Medigus Ltd.

 

Opinion on the Financial Statements

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Medigus Ltd. and its subsidiarysubsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, and the related consolidated statements of loss and other comprehensive loss, of changes in equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20172019, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, based on our audits and the report of other auditors with respect to the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, and the results of theirits operations and theirits cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2019, in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.

 

We did not audit the financial statements of Algomizer Ltd., a 8% equity investment of the Company, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019, which is reflected in the consolidated financial statements of the Company as an equity method investment of $1,149 thousand as of December 31, 2019 and loss from equity investment of $216 thousand for the year then ended. Those statements were audited by other auditors whose report thereon has been furnished to us, and our opinion expressed herein, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for Algomizer Ltd. as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019, is based solely on the report of the other auditors.

Substantial doubtDoubt about the company’s abilityCompany’s Ability to continueContinue as a going concernGoing Concern

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1b1(b) to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and negativehas cash flowsoutflows from operating activities. These factors, among others,activities that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regardsregard to these matters are also described in Note 1b.1(b). The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Change in Accounting Principle

 

As discussed in note 2(q) to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts for liabilities in 2019.

Basis for Opinion

 

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management and board of directors.management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”)(PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

 

We conducted our audits of these consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

 

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits and the report of other auditors provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

/s/ Kesselman & Kesselman

Kesselman & Kesselman

Certified Public Accountants (Isr.)

A member firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited

 

Tel - Aviv, Israel

March 22, 2018April 21, 2020

 

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1999.


F-1

 

(Continued)REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Algomizer Ltd.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the consolidated statements of financial position of Algomizer Ltd. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2019 and September 4, 2019, the related consolidated statements of comprehensive loss, shareholders’ equity, and cash flow for the period from September 4, 2019 through December 31, 2019, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and September 4, 2019 and the results of its operation and its cash flow for the period from September 4, 2019 through December 31, 2019, in conformity International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audit, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audit provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Brightman Almagor Zohar & Co.

Certified Public Accountants

A Firm in the Deloitte Global Network

Tel Aviv, Israel

April21, 2020


(Concluded) - 1

 

MEDIGUS LTD.

 

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 

    December 31, 
  Note 2017  2016 
    USD in thousands 
Assets        
         
CURRENT ASSETS:        
Cash and cash equivalents 5  2,828   3,001 
Short-term deposit 6  3,498     
Accounts receivable, net:          
Trade    18   21 
Other 7  290   366 
Inventory 2(h),8  180   198 
     6,814   3,586 
           
NON-CURRENT ASSETS:          
Inventory 2(h),8  260   934 
Property and equipment, net 9  120   178 
Intangible assets    16   26 
     396   1,138 
           
TOTAL  ASSETS    7,210   4,724 

    

December 31,

 

 
  Note 2019  2018  2017 
    USD in thousands 
         
Assets           
            
CURRENT ASSETS:           
Cash and cash equivalents 6  7,036   10,625   2,828 
Short-term deposit    -   -   3,498 
Accounts receivables – trade    22   24   18 
Inventory 8  900   81   180 
Other current assets 7  321   404   290 
     8,279   11,134   6,814 
               
NON-CURRENT ASSETS:              
Inventory 8  -   -   260 
Property and equipment, net 9  137   105   136 
Right-of-use assets, net 10  153   -   - 
Investments accounted for using the equity method 4  1,149   -   - 
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss 4,5  3,616   -   - 
     5,055   105   396 
               
TOTAL ASSETS    13,334   11,239   7,210 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

F-2

F-3

  

(Concluded) - 2

 

MEDIGUS LTD.

 

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 

    December 31, 
  Note 2017  2016 
    USD in thousands 
         
Liabilities and equity        
         
CURRENT LIABILITIES -        
Accounts payable and accruals: 11        
Trade    190   367 
Other    767   967 
     957   1,334 
           
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES:          
Long-term advanced payments    118   149 
Warrants at fair value 4  559   237 
Retirement benefit obligation, net    65   77 
     742   463 
           
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES 12         
           
TOTAL  LIABILITIES    1,699   1,797 
           
EQUITY: 13        
Ordinary share capital    5,292   1,189 
Share premium    55,040   53,817 
Other capital reserves    330   200 
Warrants    730   1,057 
Accumulated deficit    (55,881)  (53,336)
TOTAL  EQUITY    5,511   2,927 
           
TOTAL  LIABILITIES AND EQUITY    7,210   4,724 

    December 31, 
  Note 2019  2018  2017 
    USD in thousands 
Liabilities and equity           
            
CURRENT LIABILITIES :           
Accounts payables - trade 12  75   190   190 
Lease liabilities 10  119   -   - 
Warrants at fair value 5, 2r  1,459   1,601   559 
Contract liability 17b  502   231   61 
Accrued compensation expenses    607   588   506 
Other current liabilities 12  603   353   200 
     3,365   2,963   1,516 
               
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES:              
Lease liabilities 10  33   -   - 
Contract liability 17b  1,800   118   118 
Retirement benefit obligation, net    5   79   65 
     1,838   197   183 
               
TOTAL LIABILITIES    5,203   3,160   1,699 
               
EQUITY: 13            
Share capital – ordinary shares of NIS 1.00 par value:
authorized – December 31,2018 – 160,000,000 shares, December 2019 – 250,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding - December 31, 2018 – 75,932,058 shares December 31, 2019 – 82,598,738 shares
    22,802   20,924   5,292 
Share premium    47,873   48,942   55,040 
Other capital reserves    12,492   692   330 
Warrants    197   -   730 
Accumulated deficit    (76,657)  (62,479)  (55,881)
Equity attributable to owners of Medigus Ltd.    6,707   8,079   5,511 
Non-controlling interests 4  1,424   -   - 
     8,131   8,079   5,511 
               
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY    13,334   11,239   7,210 

  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-3

MEDIGUS LTD.

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF LOSS AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

 

    Year Ended December 31, 
  Note 2017  2016  2015 
    USD in thousands 
            
REVENUES 17  467   549   624 
COST OF REVENUES: 14            
PRODUCTS AND SERVICES    219   176   277 
INVENTORY IMPAIRMENT 2(h)  297   -   - 
GROSS PROFIT (LOSS)    (49)  373   347 
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT EXPENSES 14  2,208   3,655   4,384 
SALES AND MARKETING EXPENSES 14  846   2,125   2,680 
GENERAL  AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES 14  3,005   3,684   2,842 
OTHER INCOME, NET            3 
OPERATING LOSS    (6,108)  (9,091)  (9,556)
PROFIT FROM CHANGES IN FAIR VALUE OF WARRANTS ISSUED TO INVESTORS 4  3,502   25   106 
FINANCING INCOME IN RESPECT OF DEPOSITS AND EXCHANGE DIFFERENCES    71   99   19 
FINANCING EXPENSES IN RESPECT OF BANK COMMISSIONS    (17)  (12)  (33)
FINANCING INCOME, NET    3,556   112   92 
LOSS BEFORE TAXES ON INCOME    (2,552)  (8,979)  (9,464)
TAXES BENEFIT (TAXES ON INCOME) 10  7   (28)  (68)
LOSS FOR THE YEAR    (2,545)  (9,007)  (9,532)
               
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS FOR THE YEAR              
Amounts which will not be reclassified to profit or loss -              
Currency translation differences            (211)
               
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE LOSS FOR THE YEAR    (2,545)  (9,007)  (9,743)
               
     

USD

 
               
BASIC LOSS PER SHARE 15  (0.02)  (0.26)  (0.34)
DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE 15  (0.02)  (0.26)  (0.34)
               
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING  USED TO COMPUTE (IN THOUSANDS) 15            
               
     BASIC LOSS PER SHARE    125,685   34,397   28,415 
     DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE    129,690   34,397   28,415 

    Year Ended December 31, 
  Note 2019  2018  2017 
    USD in thousands 
            
REVENUES: 17         
PRODUCTS    188   219   467 
SERVICES    85   217   - 
     273   436   467 
               
COST OF REVENUES: 14            
PRODUCTS    370   164   219 
SERVICES    85   115   - 
INVENTORY IMPAIRMENT    -   328   297 
     455   607   516 
               
GROSS LOSS    (182)  (171)  (49)
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT EXPENSES 14  609   1,809   2,208 
SALES AND MARKETING EXPENSES 14  326   1,354   846 
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES 14  3,081   3,338   3,005 
NET CHANGE IN FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AT FAIR VALUE THROUGH PROFIT OR LOSS 5  92   -   - 
SHARE OF NET LOSS OF ASSOCIATE ACCOUNTED FOR USING THE EQUITY METHOD 4  (216)  -   - 
LISTING EXPENSE 4  (10,098)  -   - 
OPERATING LOSS    (14,420)  (6,672)  (6,108)
               
CHANGES IN FAIR VALUE OF WARRANTS ISSUED TO INVESTORS 5  142   148   3,502 
FINANCIAL INCOME (EXPENSES) IN RESPECT OF DEPOSITS, BANK COMMISIOMS AND EXCHANGE DIFFERENCES, NET    99   (54)  54 
FINANCING INCOME (EXPENSES), NET    241   94   3,556 
               
LOSS BEFORE TAXES ON INCOME    (14,179)  (6,578)  (2,552)
TAXES BENEFIT (TAXES ON INCOME) 11e  1   (20)  7 
LOSS FOR THE YEAR    (14,178)  (6,598)  (2,545)
               
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS              
Items that may be reclassified to profit or loss              
Share of other comprehensive income of associates accounted for using the equity method    (28)  -   - 
Items that will not be reclassified to profit or loss              
Share of other comprehensive income of associates accounted for using the equity method    (13)  -   - 
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS FOR THE YEAR    (41)  -   - 
               
TOTAL COMREHENSIVE LOSS FOR THE YEAR    (14,219)  (6,598)  (2,545)
               
Loss for the year is attributable to:              
Owners of Medigus    (14,178)  (6,598)  (2,545)
Non-controlling interest    -   -   - 
     (14,178)  (6,598)  (2,545)
               
Total comprehensive loss for the period is attributable to:              
Owners of Medigus    (14,219)  (6,598)  (2,545)
Non-controlling interest    -   -   - 
     (14,219)  (6,598)  (2,545)
               
BASIC LOSS PER ORDINARY SHARE 15  (0.18)  (0.16)  (0.20)
DILUTED LOSS PER ORDINARY SHARE 15  (0.18)  (0.16)  (0.23)

  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

F-4

F-5

 

(Continued) - 1

 

MEDIGUS LTD.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

     Equity attributed to the owners of the company   
  Note  Ordinary
shares
  Share
premium
  Capital
reserves
from
options
granted
  Capital
reserves
from
transactions
with
controlling
shareholders
  Currency
translation
differences
  Warrants  Accumulated
deficit
  Total
equity
 
     USD in thousands 
                            
BALANCE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2014      683   46,066   664           538   (906)  802   (34,797) 13,050 
                                    
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE LOSS FOR THE YEAR                      (211)      (9,532) (9,743) 
                                    
TRANSACTIONS WITH SHAREHOLDERS:                                   
Proceeds from issuance of shares and warrants, net  13B   187   5,841               730      6,758 
Options granted to employees and service providers  13B           116                  116 
Forfeiture of options  13C       83   (83)                 - 
TOTAL TRANSACTIONS WITH SHAREHOLDERS  13C   187   5,924   33           730      6,874 
BALANCE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2015      870   51,990   697   538   (1,117)  1,532   (44,329) 10,181 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-5

(Continued) - 2

MEDIGUS LTD.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

     Equity attributed to the owners of the company   
  Note  Ordinary
shares
  Share
premium
  Capital
reserves
from
options
granted
  Capital
reserves
from
transactions
with
controlling
shareholders
  Currency
translation
differences
  Warrants  Accumulated
deficit
  

Total

equity

 
     USD in thousands   
                            
BALANCE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2015      870   51,990   697   538   (1,117)  1,532   (44,329) 10,181 
                                    
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE LOSS FOR THE YEAR                              (9,007) (9,007) 
                                    
TRANSACTIONS WITH SHAREHOLDERS:                                   
Proceeds from issuance of shares and warrants, net  13B   319   1,260   70                  1,649 
Options granted to employees and service providers  13C           104                  104 
Forfeiture and expiration of options and warrants  13B,C       567   (92)          (475)     - 
TOTAL TRANSACTIONS WITH SHAREHOLDERS      319   1,827   82           (475)     1,753 
BALANCE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2016      1,189   53,817   779   538   (1,117)  1,057   (53,336) 2,927 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-6

(Concluded) - 3

MEDIGUS LTD.

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

 

     Equity attributed to the owners of the company   
  Note  Ordinary
shares
  Share
premium
  Capital
reserves
from
options
granted
  Capital
reserves
from
transactions
with
controlling
shareholders
  Currency
translation
differences
  Warrants  Accumulated
deficit
  Total
equity
 
     USD in thousands 
                            
BALANCE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2016      1,189   53,817   779   538   (1,117)  1,057   (53,336) 2,927 
                                    
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE LOSS FOR THE YEAR                              (2,545) (2,545) 
                                    
TRANSACTIONS WITH SHAREHOLDERS:                                   
Proceeds from issuance of shares and warrants, net  13C   2,501   69   267                  2,837 
Exercise of warrant, net  13C   1,602   626                      2,228 
Options granted to employees and service providers  13C          64                  64 
Forfeiture and expiration of options and warrants         528  (201)          (327)     - 
TOTAL TRANSACTIONS WITH SHAREHOLDERS      4,103   1,223   130           (327)     5,129 
BALANCE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2017      5,292   55,040   909   538   (1,117)  730   (55,881) 5,511 
       Capital and reserves attributable to owners of Medigus Ltd.    
   Note 

 

 

Ordinary shares

  Share
premium
  Capital
reserves
from
options
granted
  

 

 

Other
reserves

  Capital
reserves
from
transactions
with
non- controlling interest
  

 

 

Currency
translation
differences

  

 

 

Warrants

  Accumulated
deficit
  Total  

 

 

Non-controlling interests

  

Total

equity

BALANCE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2018    20,924   48,942   1,271   538   -   (1,117)  -   (62,479)  8,079   -  8,079
                                           
Loss for the period                                (14,178)  (14,178)  -  (14,178)
Other comprehensive loss                (13)      (28)          (41)  -  (41)
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE LOSS FOR THE YEAR                (13)      (28)      (14,178)  (14,219)  -  (14,219)
                                             
TRANSACTIONS WITH SHAREHOLDERS:                                            
Issuance of shares and warrants 13(b)(4)  1,878   (1,248)                  197       827   -  827
Transactions with non-controlling interest 4                  11,714               11,714   1,424  13,138
Share in capital reserve of an associate                    47               47   -  47
Stock-based compensation in connection with options granted to employees and service providers 13(c)          259                       259   -  259
Expiration of options        179   (179)                             -
TOTAL TRANSACTIONS WITH SHAREHOLDERS    1,878   (1,069)  80   -   11,761   -   197   -   12,847   1,424  14,271
BALANCE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2019    22,802   47,873   1,351   525   11,761   (1,145)  197   (76,657)  6,707   1,424  8,131

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-7

(Continued) - 12

 

MEDIGUS LTD.

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWSCHANGES IN EQUITY

 

  For the year ended December 31, 
  2017  2016  2015 
  USD in thousands 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:         
CASH FLOWS USED IN OPERATIONS (see Appendix)  (4,659)  (9,255)  (6,969)
Income tax paid  (22)  (14)  (45)
Interest received  -   4   33 
NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES  (4,681)  (9,265)  (6,981)
             
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:            
Purchase of property and equipment  (2)  (32)  (84)
Purchase of  intangible assets  (7)  (6)  (12)
Investment in short-term deposits  (5,000)  -   - 
Withdrawal of short-term deposits  1,500   -   - 
Net cash used in investing activities  (3,509)  (38)  (96)
             
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:            
Proceeds from issuance of shares and warrants, net  7,908   1,902   6,758 
Proceeds from exercise of warrants  11         
Net cash generated from financing activities  7,919   1,902   6,758 
             
DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS  (271)  (7,401)  (319)
BALANCE OF CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF YEAR  3,001   10,312   10,817 
GAINS (LOSSES) FROM EXCHANGE DIFFERENCES ON CASH  AND CASH EQUIVALENTS  98   90   (186)
BALANCE OF CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR  2,828   3,001   10,312 
             
Supplementary information on activities not involving cash flows -            
      Exercise of warrants  2,217         
    Capital and reserves attributable to owners of Medigus Ltd.    
  Note Ordinary
shares
  Share
premium
  Capital
reserves
from
options
granted
  

 

 

Other
reserves

  Currency
translation
differences
  Warrants  Accumulated
deficit
  

Total

equity

 
    USD in thousands 
BALANCE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2017    5,292   55,040   909   538   (1,117)  730   (55,881)  5,511 
                                   
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE LOSS FOR THE YEAR                            (6,598)  (6,598)
                                   
TRANSACTIONS WITH SHAREHOLDERS:                                  
Issuance of shares and warrants 13(b)(3)  3,179   (1,823)  630                   1,986 
Exercise of warrant, net 13 (b)(3)  12,453   (5,430)                      7,023 
Stock-based compensation in connection with options granted to employees and service providers 13(c)          157                   157 
Expiration of options and warrants        1,155   (425)          (730)      - 
TOTAL TRANSACTIONS WITH SHAREHOLDERS    15,632   (6,098)  362   -   -   (730)  -   9,166 
BALANCE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2018    20,924   48,942   1,271   538   (1,117)  -   (62,479)  8,079 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


(Concluded) - 3

MEDIGUS LTD.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

    Capital and reserves attributable to owners of Medigus Ltd.    
  Note Ordinary
shares
  Share
premium
  Capital
reserves
from
options
granted
  

 

 

Other
reserves

  Currency
translation
differences
  Warrants  Accumulated
deficit
  Total
equity
 
    USD in thousands 
BALANCE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2016    1,189   53,817   779   538   (1,117)  1,057   (53,336)  2,927 
                                   
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE LOSS FOR THE YEAR                            (2,545)  (2,545)
                                   
TRANSACTIONS WITH SHAREHOLDERS:                                  
Issuance of shares and warrants 13(b)(1)(2)  2,501   69   267                   2,837 
Exercise of warrant, net 13(b)(1)  1,602   626                       2,228 
Stock-based compensation in connection with options granted to employees and service providers 13(c)          64                   64 
Forfeiture and expiration of options and warrants        528   (201)          (327)      - 
TOTAL TRANSACTIONS WITH SHAREHOLDERS    4,103   1,223   130   -   -   (327)  -   5,129 
BALANCE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2017    5,292   55,040   909   538   (1,117)  730   (55,881)  5,511 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


F-8

(Continued) - 1

MEDIGUS LTD.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

  For the year ended December 31, 
  2019  2018  2017 
  USD in thousands 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:            
CASH FLOWS USED IN OPERATIONS(see Appendix)  (2,757)  (4,253)  (4,659)
Interest received  75   42   - 
Interest paid  (5)  -   - 
Income tax paid  (8)  (11)  (22)
Net cash flow used in operating activities  (2,695)  (4,222)  (4,681)
             
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:            
Payments for purchase of property and equipment  (62)  (11)  (9)
Payment for acquisition of associate and financial assets at fair value through profit or loss (note 4)  (4,057)  -   - 
Investment in short-term deposits  -   -   (5,000)
Withdrawal of short-term deposits  -   3,498   1,500 
Net cash flow generated from (used in) investing activities  (4,119)  3,487   (3,509)
             
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:            
Transaction with non-controlling interest(note 1)  3,202   -   - 
Principal elements of lease liability  (46)  -   - 
Proceeds from issuance of shares and warrants and from exercise of warrants, net of issuances costs  -   8,634   7,919 
Net cash flow generated from financing activities  3,156   8,634   7,919 
             
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS  (3,658)  7,899   (271)
BALANCE OF CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF YEAR  10,625   2,828   3,001 
GAINS (LOSSES) FROM EXCHANGE DIFFERENCES ON CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS  69   (102)  98 
BALANCE OF CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR  7,036   10,625   2,828 
             
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:            
Right of use assets obtained in exchange for lease liabilities (note 10)  174   -   - 
Non cash Investment agreement in the Algomizer Group and Issue of ADS (note 4)  827   -   - 
Unpaid Recapitalization Transaction costs  89   -   - 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


(Continued) - 2

MEDIGUS LTD.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FOR CASH FLOW:

 F-8

As of

December 30, 2019

USD in thousands
Assets acquired (liabilities assumed):
Current assets excluding cash and cash equivalents-
Current liabilities(73)
Transaction costs(89)
Effect on equity items(3,040)
Cash obtained in connection with transaction with non-controlling interest3,202 

F-10

 

(Concluded) - 23

 

MEDIGUS LTD.

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

  

APPENDIX TO THE STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS:

 

  For the year ended December 31, 
  2017  2016  2015 
  USD in thousands 
NET CASH USED IN OPERATIONS:         
Loss for the year before taxes on income  (2,552)  (8,979)  (9,464)
Adjustment in respect of:            
Profit from changes in the fair value of warrants issued to investors  (3,502)  (25)  (106)
Losses (gains) from exchange differences on cash and cash equivalents  (98)  (90)  4 
Retirement benefit obligation, net  (12)  (21)  - 
Inventory impairment  297   -   - 
Gains on change in the fair value of financial instruments at fair value through profit or loss  -   -   (3)
Issuance expenses which were attributed to the warrants classified as a financial liability and charged directly to profit or loss  970   -   - 
Revaluation of and exchange differences on short-term deposits  2   -   - 
Interest received  -   (4)  (33)
Depreciation  60   80   100 
Amortization  17   19   22 
Options granted to employees and service providers  64   104   116 
             
CHANGES IN OPERATING ASSET AND LIABILITY ITEMS:            
Decrease (increase) in accounts receivable:            
Trade  3   233   (126)
Other  262   640   (425)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accruals:            
Trade  (177)  9   155 
Other  (202)  (393)  657 
Decrease (increase) in inventory  209   (828)  56 
Net sales of financial assets at fair value through profit
or loss
  -   -   2,078 
NET CASH USED IN OPERATIONS  (4,659)  (9,255)  (6,969)

  For the year ended December 31, 
  2019  2018  2017 
  USD in thousands 
NET CASH USED IN OPERATIONS:         
Loss for the year before taxes on income  (14,179)  (6,578)  (2,552)
Adjustment in respect of:            
Depreciation  75   42   77 
Net change in the fair value of financial assets at fair value through profit or loss  (92)  -   - 
Changes in fair value of warrants issued to investors  (142)  (148)  (3,502)
Loss (gain) from exchange differences on cash and cash equivalents  (69)  102   (98)
Share of losses of associate company  216   -   - 
Retirement benefit obligation, net  (74)  14   (12)
Interest expenses  5   -   - 
Inventory impairment  -   328   297 
Issuance expenses which were attributed to the warrants classified as a financial liability and charged directly to profit or loss  -   1,565   970 
Listing expenses  10,098         
Revaluation of and exchange differences on short-term deposits  -   -   2 
Interest received  (75)  (42)  - 
Stock-based compensation in connection with options granted to employees and service providers  259   157   64 
             
CHANGES IN OPERATING ASSET AND LIABILITY ITEMS:            
Decrease (increase) in accounts receivable - trade  2   (6)  3 
Decrease (increase) in other current assets  83   (101)  262 
Increase (decrease) in accounts payables - trade  (115)  -   (177)
Increase (decrease) in accrued compensation expenses  29  73   (32)
Increase (decrease) in contract liability  1,953   170   (132)
Increase (decrease) in other current liabilities  88   153   (38)
Decrease (increase) in inventory  (819)  18   209 
NET CASH USED IN OPERATIONS  (2,757)  (4,253)  (4,659)

  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-9

MEDIGUS LTD.

 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

NOTE 1 - GENERAL:

 

a.Medigus Ltd. (the “Company” or “Medigus”) was incorporated in Israel on December 9, 19991999. Company’s registered office and is residentprincipal place of business are located in Israel. The address of its registered office is P.O. Box 3030, Omer, Israel 8496500.

 

On July 22,24, 2007 the Company established a wholly owned subsidiary, MEDIGUS USA LLC (or “Medigus USA”), in the State of Delaware, USA (hereinafter - the “Subsidiary”).

 

The SubsidiaryMedigus USA has not been engaged in any business activities until October 2013.

 

On October 1, 2013, the Company and its SubsidiaryMedigus USA entered into an inter-company agreement whereby the Subsidiary provides services to the Company in consideration for a reimbursement of its costs plus a reasonable premium. In February 2019, Medigus USA LLC ceased its operations due to the termination of Chris Rowland, the Company’s previous chief executive officer.

On January 3, 2019, the Company established a wholly owned subsidiary in Israel under the name ScoutCam Ltd., or ScoutCam. ScoutCam was incorporated as part of a reorganization of the Company intended to distinguish the Company’s miniaturized imaging business, or the micro ScoutCam™ portfolio, from the other operations of the Company and to enable the Company to form a separate business unit with dedicated resources focused on the promotion of such technology.

On September 16, 2019, the Company entered into a Securities Exchange Agreement (the “Exchange Agreement”), with ScoutCam Inc,formally known as Intellisense Solutions Inc (“Intellisense” or “INLL”), pursuant to which the Company assigned, transferred and delivered 100% of its holdings in ScoutCam to ScoutCam Inc, in exchange for consideration consisting of shares of ScoutCam’s Inc. common stock representing 60% of the issued and outstanding share capital of ScoutCam Inc. immediately upon the closing of the Exchange Agreement (the “Closing”). For additional information, see note 4.

“Group” - the Company together with Medigus USA and ScoutCam Inc.

“Subsidiaries” – Entities under the control of the Company.

 

The Company together with its subsidiary (hereinafter –currently own a minority stake in Algomizer and Linkury, which operates in the “Group”) is a medical device group specializingfield of software development, marketing and distribution to internet users. For additional information, see note 4.

The Company has previously engaged in developing innovative endoscopic proceduresthe development, production and devices. To date most of the Group’s research and development activities have been focused in developing and manufacturingmarketing of the Medigus Ultrasonic Surgical Endostapler ((MUSE) (hereinafter - “MUSE”) endoscopy system, an FDA approved system, for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (hereinafter - “GERD”). The Company is no longer maintaining efforts to commercialize the MUSE System and rather are pursuing potential opportunities to sell or grant a license for the use of our MUSE technology.

ScoutCam is engaged in the development, production and marketing of innovative miniaturized imaging equipment known as micro ScoutCam™ portfolio for use in medical procedures as well as various industrial applications.

In addition, the Group usesScoutCam used the technological platform it developed for the purpose of additional special systems and products that are suitable for both medical and industrial applications.

 

To date,On June 3, 2019, the Group continues negotiationsCompany entered into a Licensing and Sale Agreement with Shanghai Golden Grand-Medical Instruments Ltd. (hereinafter “Golden Grand”) for the know-how licensing and sale of goods relating to marketMUSE system in China, Hong Kong, Taiwan and Macao. Under the agreement, the Company committed to provide a license, training services and goods to Golden Grand in consideration for USD 3 million to be paid to the Company in four milestones based installments. The final milestone and the final installment shall be completed and paid upon the completion of a MUSE endoscopy system, together with marketing and selling miniature cameras and related equipment.assembly line in China (see note 17b). The Company examines additional potential opportunities to sale MUSE to other territories.


MEDIGUS LTD.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1 - GENERAL(continued):

 

The Company’s shares are listed on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange Ltd. (hereinafter - “TASE”) and as of May 20, 2015, the Company’s American Depository Shares (hereinafter – “ADSs”) evidenced by American Depositary Receipts (hereinafter – “ADRs”) are listed on the NASDAQNasdaq Capital Market. The Company’s depositary agent for the ADR program is The Bank of New York Mellon.

On March 15, 2017, Since July 2018, the Company effected a change in the ratio of its ordinary shares per ADS from 5 ordinary shares per ADS to 50 ordinary shares per ADS. The change in the ordinary shares ratio for the ADSs had the same effect as a 1-for-10 reverse stock split of the ADSs (hereinafter – the “Revenue Split”). As a result of such change each ADR represents 50 ordinary shares of the Company as of December 31, 2017.

Unless stated otherwise, all ADS and ordinary shares per ADS numbersCompany’s Series C Warrants are after the Reverse Split.traded on Nasdaq Capital Market.

 

b.

During the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, the Group incurred a total comprehensive loss of approximately USD 2.514.2 million and a negative cash flows from operating activities of approximately USD 4.72.7 million. AsFurthermore, in the recent years the Group has suffered recurring losses from operations, negative cash flows from operating activities and has an accumulated deficit as of December 31, 2017,2019. As a result, there is a substantial doubt about the Group had incurred accumulated deficitGroup’s ability to continue as a going concern.

Management expects that the Company on a standalone basis will continue to generate operating losses. Management has initiated a plan to reduce operating expenses and plans to continue to fund its operations primarily through utilization of approximately USD 55.9 million. its financial resources. In addition, the Company may raise additional capital or realize some of its investments in other entities in order to fund its operating needs. Management is of the opinion that based on the Company's current operating plan it will be able to carry out its plan for one year after the issuance date of these financial statements.

Based on the projected cash flows and current cash and cash equivalents and short-term deposit balances as of December 31, 2017, which totaled to USD 2.8 million and USD 3.5 million, respectively,ScoutCam, Management is of the opinion that without further fund raising it will not have sufficient resources to enable it to continue its operating activities including the development, manufacturing and marketing of its products for a period of at least 12 months fromone year after the sign-offissuance date of these financial statements. As aScoutCam's management plans include continuing commercialization of the products and securing sufficient financing through the sale of additional equity securities, debt or capital inflows from strategic partnerships and other opportunities. There are no assurances however, that ScoutCam will be successful in obtaining the level of financing needed for its operations. If ScoutCam is unsuccessful in commercializing its products and securing sufficient financing, it may need to reduce activities, curtail or even cease operations.

The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result there is a substantial doubt aboutfrom the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern.outcome of this uncertainty.

Management’s plans include continuing commercialization of the Group’s products and securing sufficient financing through the sale of additional equity securities, debt or capital inflows from strategic partnerships and others. There are no assurances however, that the Group will be successful in obtaining the level of financing needed for its operations. If the Group is unsuccessful in commercializing its products and securing sufficient financing, it may need to reduce activities, curtail or even cease operations.

The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets and the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Group be unable to continue as a going concern.

F-10

MEDIGUS LTD.

 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

NOTE 2 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:

 

a.Basis for preparation of the financial statements:

 

The Group’s consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 20172019, 2018 and 20162017 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2019, are in compliance with International Financial Reporting Standards, which are standards and interpretations thereto issued by the International Accounting Standard Board (hereinafter “IFRS”).

 

In connection with the presentation of these consolidated financial statements it is noted as follows:

 

1)The significant accounting policies applied in the preparation of these consolidated financial statements are set out below. These policies have been consistently applied to all years presented, unless otherwise stated.

 

2)These consolidated financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention, as modified by the revaluation of plan assets related to the retirement benefit obligation, and financial liabilities (including derivative instruments) and assets measured at fair value through profit or loss.

 

3)The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires the use of certain critical accounting estimates. It also requires management to exercise its judgment in the process of applying the Group’s accounting policies. Areas involving a higher degree of judgment or complexity, or areas where assumptions and estimates are significant to the consolidated financial statements are disclosed in note 3. Actual results may differ materially from estimates and assumptions used by management.

 

4)The Group analyzes the expenses recognized in the consolidated statement of loss using a classification method based on the expenses’ function.

 

b.ConsolidationPrinciples of consolidation

Subsidiaries

Subsidiaries are all entities over which the group has control. The group controls an entity where the group is exposed to, or has rights to, variable returns from its involvement with the entity and has the ability to affect those returns through its power to direct the activities of the entity. Subsidiaries are fully consolidated from the date on which control is transferred to the group. They are deconsolidated from the date that control ceases.

Principles of consolidation

 

Inter-company transactions, balances and balancesunrealized gains on transactions between group companies are eliminated. Unrealized losses are also eliminated as partunless the transaction provides evidence of an impairment of the consolidation.

transferred asset. Accounting policies of subsidiaries have been changed where necessary to ensure consistency with the Subsidiarypolicies adopted by the group.

Non-controlling interests in the results and equity of subsidiaries are thoseshown separately in the consolidated statement of profit or loss, statement of comprehensive income, statement of changes in equity and balance sheet respectively.


MEDIGUS LTD.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 2 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES(continued):

Changes in ownership interests

The group treats transactions with non-controlling interests that do not result in a loss of control as transactions with equity owners of the Companygroup. A change in ownership interest results in an adjustment between the carrying amounts of the controlling and have been consistently applied.non-controlling interests to reflect their relative interests in the subsidiary. Any difference between the amount of the adjustment to non-controlling interests and any consideration paid or received is recognized in a separate reserve within equity attributable to owners of Medigus Ltd.

When the group ceases to consolidate for an investment because of a loss of control any retained interest in the entity is remeasured to its fair value, with the change in carrying amount recognized in profit or loss. Amounts previously recognized in other comprehensive income in respect of that entity are accounted for as if the group had directly disposed of the related assets or liabilities. This may mean that amounts previously recognized in other comprehensive income are reclassified to profit or loss, if applicable.

  

c.TranslationPrinciples of foreign currency balancesequity accounting and transactions:

1)The functional currency and the presentation currencychange in ownership interest

 

Items includedAssociates

Associates are all entities over which the group has significant influence but not control or joint control. Investments in associates are accounted for using the equity method of accounting, after initially being recognized at cost.

Equity method

Under the equity method of accounting, the investments are initially recognized at cost and adjusted thereafter to recognize the group’s share of the post acquisition profits or losses of the investee in profit or loss and the group’s share of movements in other comprehensive income of the investee in other comprehensive income. Dividends received or receivable from associates are recognized as a reduction in the financial statementscarrying amount of the Companyinvestment.

Where -accounted investment equals or exceeds its interest in the entity, including any other unsecured long-term receivables, the group does not recognize further losses, unless it has incurred obligations or made payments on behalf of the other entity.

Unrealised gains on transactions between the group and its Subsidiaryassociates are eliminated to the extent of the group’s interest in these entities. Unrealised losses are also eliminated unless the transaction provides evidence of an impairment of the asset transferred. Accounting policies of equity-accounted investees have been prepared inchanged where necessary to ensure consistency with the currency ofpolicies adopted by the principal economic environment in which it operates (hereinafter – “the functional currency”).Effective January 1, 2016, the Group changed its functional currency to the U.S. dollar (hereinafter – “dollar” or “USD”) from the New Israeli Shekel (hereinafter – “NIS”). This change was based on management’s assessment that the dollar is the primary currency of the economic environment in which the Group operates. Accordingly effective January 1, 2016, the functional currency of the Group is the USD.group.

 

The consolidated financial statements are presentedcarrying amount of equity-accounted investments is tested for impairment in USD, which isaccordance with the Group’s presentation currency, and rounded to the nearest thousand.policy described in note 2(f).

 

F-11

Table of ContentsChanges in ownership interests

 

When the group ceases to equity account for an investment because of a loss of significant influence, any retained interest in the entity is remeasured to its fair value, with the change in carrying amount recognised in profit or loss. This fair value becomes the initial carrying amount for the purposes of subsequently accounting for the retained interest as an associate. In addition, any amounts previously recognised in other comprehensive income in respect of that entity are accounted for as if the group had directly disposed of the related assets or liabilities. This may mean that amounts previously recognised in other comprehensive income are reclassified to profit or loss.

If the ownership interest in an associate is reduced but joint control or significant influence is retained, only a proportionate share of the amounts previously recognised in other comprehensive income are reclassified to profit or loss where appropriate.


MEDIGUS LTD.

 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

NOTE 2 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued):

d.Translation of foreign currency balances and transactions:

1)The functional currency and the presentation currency

The reporting and functional currency of the Company and each of its subsidiaries is the USD.

The consolidated financial statements are presented in USD and rounded to the nearest thousand.

 

2)Transactions and balances

 

Transactions made in a currency which is different from the functional currency (hereinafter – “foreign currency”) are translated into the functional currency using the exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the transactions. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the translation at the end-of-year exchange rates of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are recognized in income or loss.

 

Gains and losses from changes in exchange rates are presented in the consolidated statement of loss and other comprehensive loss within the “Financing income in respect of deposits and exchange differences” line item.

 

d.3)Group companies

The results and financial position of foreign operations (none of which has the currency of a hyperinflationary economy) that have a functional currency different from the presentation currency are translated into the presentation currency as follows:

assets and liabilities for each balance sheet presented are translated at the closing rate at the date of that balance sheet
income and expenses for each statement of profit or loss and statement of comprehensive income are translated at average exchange rates (unless this is not a reasonable approximation of the cumulative effect of the rates prevailing on the transaction dates, in which case income and expenses are translated at the dates of the transactions), and
all resulting exchange differences are recognised in other comprehensive income.

On consolidation, exchange differences arising from the translation of any net investment in foreign entities, and of borrowings and other financial instruments designated as hedges of such investments, are recognised in other comprehensive income.

Goodwill and fair value adjustments arising on the acquisition of a foreign operation are treated as assets and liabilities of the foreign operation and translated at the closing rate.


MEDIGUS LTD.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 2 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued):

e.Property and equipment

 

Property and equipment are initially recognized at purchased cost. Subsequent costs are included in the asset’s carrying amount or recognized as a separate asset, as appropriate, only when it is probable that future economic benefits associated with the item will flow to the Group and the cost of the item can be measured reliably. The carrying amount of replaced items is derecognized. All other repairs and maintenance are charged to income or loss during the financial period in which they are incurred.

 

Property and equipment is recognized at cost less accumulated depreciation.

 

Depreciation is calculated using the straight line method over the estimated useful life of the asset as follows:

 

Machinery and equipment 6 – 10 years (primarily 10)
Furniture 7 – 14 years
ComputersComputers3 years
Computer programs 3 years

  

Leasehold improvements are depreciated using the straight line method over the shorter of the term of the lease or the estimated useful lives of the assets.

 

The assets’ residual values, their useful lives and the depreciation method are reviewed, and adjusted if appropriate, at the end of each year.

 

Gains or losses with respect to disposals are determined by comparing the net proceeds with the carrying amount and recognized in the consolidated statement of loss and other comprehensive loss within “Other income – net” line item.

 

e.Intangible assets:

Computer programs

Licenses to use purchased computer programs are capitalized on the basis of the costs incurred in their purchase and preparation for use of the specific program. These costs are amortized using the straight line method over the estimated useful life of the assets (usually three years).

Costs related to the maintenance of computer programs are recognized as expenses when incurred.

F-12

MEDIGUS LTD.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 2 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued):

f.Impairment of non-monetary assets

 

Non-monetary assets are tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable.

 

An impairment loss is recognized for the amount by which the asset’s carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is the higher of an asset’s fair value less selling costs and value in use. For the purposes of assessing impairment, assets are grouped at the lowest levels of identifiable cash flows (cash-generating units). Non-monetary assets that were impaired are reviewed for possible reversal of the impairment recognized at each balance sheet date.

 

g.Financial instruments:

1)Classification

The Group classifies its financial assets to the category of receivables. The classification depends, among other things, on the purpose for which the financial assets were purchased. Management determines the classification of financial assets upon initial recognition.

Receivables

Receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted on an active market. These assets are classified as current assets, except for maturities longer than 12 months following the date of the balance sheet which are classified as non-current assets. The Group’s receivables are included in “accounts receivable”, “short-term deposits” and “cash and cash equivalents” in the consolidated balance sheet (see also sections i and j below).

The Group classifies its financial liabilities to the following categories: financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss and financial liabilities at amortized cost. The Group’s management determines the classification of financial liabilities upon initial recognition.

a)Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss.

Warrants allotted to investors with a cashless exercise mechanism. In accordance with International Accounting Standard 32: “Financial Instruments: Presentation”, these warrants classified as a “financial liability”. As the aforementioned liability is a non-equity derivative financial instrument, it is classified in accordance with IAS 39 as a financial liability at fair value through profit or loss, which is measured at its fair value at each date of the balance sheet, with changes in the fair value carried to “profit from changes in fair value of warrants issued to investors” in the consolidated statement of loss and comprehensive loss.

b)Financial liabilities at amortized cost

Trade payables and financial liabilities included in “other liabilities” are recognized initially at fair value and subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method.

F-13

MEDIGUS LTD.

 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

NOTE 2 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued):

  

2)g.Financial instruments:

As of January 1, 2018, the Group adopted IFRS 9“Financial Instruments”.

Financial assets

Classification

The group classifies its financial assets in the following measurement categories:

those to be measured subsequently at fair through profit or loss, and
those to be measured at amortised cost.

The classification depends on the entity’s business model for managing the financial assets and the contractual terms of the cash flows.

For assets measured at fair value, gains and losses will be recorded in profit or loss.

Recognition and measurement

 

Regular way purchases and sales of financial assets are recorded at therecognised on trade date, of the settlement which isbeing the date on which the asset was deliveredgroup commits to purchase or sell the Group or delivered from the Group.

Investments are initially recognized at fair value plus transaction costs for all financial assets not carried at fair value through profit or loss.asset. Financial assets are derecognizedderecognised when the rights to receive cash flows from the investmentsfinancial assets have expired or have been transferred and the Groupgroup has transferred substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership associated with these assets. Receivablesownership.

Measurement

At initial recognition, the group measures a financial asset at its fair value plus, in the case of a financial asset not at fair value through profit or loss (FVPL), transaction costs that are subsequentlydirectly attributable to the acquisition of the financial asset. Transaction costs of financial assets carried at amortized cost using the effective interest method.FVPL are expensed in profit or loss.

 

GainsFinancial assets with embedded derivatives are considered in their entirety when determining whether their cash flows are solely payment of principal and interest.

Debt instruments

Subsequent measurement of debt instruments depends on the group’s business model for managing the asset and the cash flow characteristics of the asset. There are three measurement categories into which the group classifies its debt instruments:

Amortised cost: Assets that are held for collection of contractual cash flows, where those cash flows represent solely payments of principal and interest, are measured at amortised cost. Interest income from these financial assets is included in finance income using the effective interest rate method. Any gain or loss arising on derecognition is recognised directly in profit or loss and presented in other gains/(losses) together with foreign exchange gains and losses.

A gain or loss on a debt investment that is subsequently measured at FVPL is recognised in profit or loss and presented net within other gains/(losses) in the period in which it arises.


MEDIGUS LTD.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 2 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued):

Equity instruments

The group subsequently measures equity investments at fair value except when the group has control or losses arisingsignificant influence. Dividends from such investments continue to be recognized in profit or loss as other income when the changesgroup’s right to receive payments is established.

Changes in the fair value of financial assets at FVPL are recognized in “net change in fair value of financial assets at fair value through profit or loss are presentedloss” in the consolidated statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive loss within “other income - net” line item in the period in which they were incurred.

As to methods for measurement of the Group’s financial instruments, see note 4.as applicable.

 

3)Impairment of financial assets

 

The Group recognizes a loss allowance for expected credit losses on financial assets at amortized cost.

At each reporting date, the Group assesses whether the credit risk on a financial instrument has increased significantly since initial recognition. If the financial instrument is determined to have a low credit risk at eachthe reporting date, the Company assumes that the credit risk on a financial instrument has not increased significantly since initial recognition.

The Group measures the loss allowance for expected credit losses on trade receivables that are within the scope of IFRS 15 and on financial instruments for which the credit risk has increased significantly since initial recognition based on lifetime expected credit losses. Otherwise, the Group measures the loss allowance at an amount equal to 12-month expected credit losses at the current reporting date. 

Prior to the effective date and adoption of IFRS 9, the financial assets of the balance sheetGroup were classified into the following categories: financial assets at fair value through profit or loss, and loans and receivables. The classification depended on the purpose for which the financial assets were acquired, also, prior to the adoption of IFRS 9, the Group assessed at December 31, 2017, whether there is any objective evidence that a financial asset or group of financial assets was impaired.

Financial liabilities

Financial liabilities are initially recognized at their fair value minus, in the case of a financial liability not at fair value through profit or loss, transaction costs that are directly attributable to the issue of the financial liability.

Financial liabilities are subsequently measured at amortized cost, is impaired. Aexcept for derivative financial assetinstruments, which are subsequently measured at fair value through profit or loss. 

The Group has early adopted the narrow-scope amendment to IAS 1 as described in note 2(q). Accordingly, financial liabilities are classified as non-current if the Group has a group of financial assets is impaired and impairment losses are incurred only if there is objective evidence of impairment as a result of one or more events that occurred aftersubstantive right to defer settlement for at least 12 months at the initial recognitionend of the asset (a ‘loss event’) and that loss event (or events) has an impact on the estimated future cash flowsreporting period, otherwise, they are classified as current liabilities.

The Group’s financial liabilities at amortized cost are included in accounts payable, accrued expenses, other current liabilities, payable in respect of the financialintangible asset or group of financial assets that can be reliably estimated.and lease liabilities.

 

The derivative financial instruments represent warrants that confer the right to net share settlement.

F-14

 

The Group removes a financial liability (or a part of a financial liability) when, and only when, it is extinguished (when the obligation specified in the contract is discharged, cancelled or expired).


MEDIGUS LTD.

 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

NOTE 2 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued):

 

h.Inventory

 

Inventory is measured at the lower of cost or net realizable value.

 

The cost is determined on the basis of “first in-first out” basis. Cost of purchased products and inventory in process includes costs of design, raw materials, direct labor, other direct costs and fixed production overheads.

 

Net realizable value is an estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business less applicable variable selling expenses.

 

Provisions for potentially obsolete or slow-moving inventory are made based on management’s analysis of inventory levels and historical obsolescence.

 

Materials and other supplies held for use in the production of inventories are not written down below cost if the finished products in which they will be incorporated are expected to be sold at or above cost.

 

The Group periodically analyzes anticipated product sales based on historical results, current backlog and marketing plans. Based on these analyses, the Group anticipates that certain products will not be sold during the next twelve months, such products were classified within the non-current assets.

  

i.Trade receivables

 

The balance of trade receivables includes amounts due from customers for products sold or services rendered in the ordinary course of business. If collection is expected in one year or less, they are classified as current assets. If not, they are presented as non-current assets.

 

Trade receivables are recognized initially at fair value and subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method, less provision for doubtful accounts.loss allowance.

 

j.Cash and cash equivalents

 

Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand and deposits held at call with banks with original maturities of three months or less.

 


MEDIGUS LTD.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 2 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued):

k.Current and deferred taxes

 

Tax expenses for the reported years include current taxes. The taxes are recognized in the consolidated statements of Loss and other comprehensive Loss.

 

The amount that was recorded as current taxes, is calculated based on the tax laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date, in countries in which the Company and its Subsidiary operate and generate taxable income. The Group’s management periodically evaluates the tax implications applicable to the taxable income, in accordance with the relevant tax laws, and creates provisions in accordance with the amounts expected to be paid to the tax authorities.

 

The Group recognizes deferred taxes using the liability method, for temporary differences between the amounts of assets and liabilities included in the financial statements, and the amounts for tax purposes. Deferred taxes are not recognized, if the temporary differences arise at the initial recognition of the asset or liability which at the time of the transaction has no effect on profit or loss, whether for accounting or tax reporting. The amount of deferred taxes is determined using the tax rates (and laws) which are expected to apply when the related deferred tax assets is realized or the deferred tax liabilities will be settled.

 

F-15

MEDIGUS LTD.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 2 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued):investments in subsidiaries where the company is able to control the timing of the reversal of the temporary differences and it is probable that the differences will not reverse in the foreseeable future.

 

Deferred tax assets are recognized for temporary differences that are tax deductible, up to the amount of the differences that are expected to be utilized in the future, against taxable income.

 

No deferred tax assets have been recorded in the Group’s books and records with respect to accumulated losses since it is not probable that the Group will be able to utilize such losses in the foreseeable future against taxable income.

 

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset only if:

 

-There is a legally enforceable right to offset current tax assets against current tax liabilities; and

-Deferred income tax assets and liabilities relate to income taxes imposed by the same taxation authority on the same taxable entity.

 

In the event of a dividend distribution originating from tax exempted “benefited enterprises”, tax will be levied on the amount distributed using the tax rate that would have been applicable to Company had it not been exempted from tax. In the event of such a distribution, the amount of tax will be recognized as an expense in the consolidated statement of loss and other comprehensive loss.

 


MEDIGUS LTD.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 2 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued):

l.Employee benefits

 

1)Pension and severance pay obligations

 

Israeli labor laws and Company’s work agreements require the Company to pay retirement benefits to employees terminated or leaving their employment, in certain circumstances. Most of the Company’s employees are covered by a defined contribution plan under Section 14 of the Israel Severance Pay Law. According to the plan, the Company regularly makes payments to severance pay or pension funds without having a legal or constructive obligation to pay further contributions if the funds does not hold sufficient assets to pay all employees in the plan the benefits relating to employee service in the current and prior periods. Contributions for severance pay or pension are recognized as employee benefit expenses when they are due commensurate with receipt of work services from the employee and no further provision is required in the financial statements.

 

With respect to the remaining employees, the Company records a liability on its balance sheet for defined benefit plans that represent the present value of the defined benefit obligation as of each reporting date, net of the fair value of plan assets. The present value of the defined benefit liability is determined by discounting the anticipated future cash outflows, using interest rates that are denominated in the currency in which the benefits will be payable.

 

2)Vacation and recreation pay

 

Under the Israeli law each employee is legally entitled to vacation and recreation benefits. The entitlement is based on term of employment. The Group records such obligations as incurred.

 

3)Bonus plans

 

The Group record bonus obligation when a contractual or constructive obligation exists. Such bonus obligation is record in the amount expected to be paid, to the extent that the Group can reliably estimate the amount expected to be paid.

  

 F-16m.

MEDIGUS LTD.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 2 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES(continued):

m.Share based payments

 

The Company granted several equity-settled share based compensation plans to the Group’s employees and other service providers in connection with their service to the Group. The fair value of such services is calculated at the grant date and amortized to the statement of loss and other comprehensive loss during the vesting period. The total amount charged as an expense is determined taking into consideration the fair value of the options granted:

 

-Without considering service and performance conditions, which are non-market vesting conditions (e.g. meeting profit and sales targets and continued employment in the Company for a certain period).

 

-Non-market vesting conditions are included among the assumptions in connection with the estimate level of options vesting period. The total expense is recognized during the vesting period, which is the period over which all of the specified vesting conditions of the share-based payment are to be satisfied.


MEDIGUS LTD.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 2 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued):

 

The Group analyze the estimate level of options vesting period at each cut-off date, based on non-market vesting conditions. In case such analysis result in a variance vs. the original estimates, the Group records such variance in profit or loss, with a corresponding adjustment to equity.

 

When the options are exercised, the Company issues new shares. The proceeds, less directly related transaction costs, are reflected in the share capital (at par value) and in share premium.

 

n.Revenue recognition

a)Revenue recognitionmeasurement

 

Commencing January 1, 2018 (the initial implementation date of IFRS 15), the Group’s revenues are measured according to the amount of consideration that the Group expects to be entitled in exchange for transferring promised goods or services to a customer, excluding amounts collected on behalf of third parties, such as sales taxes. Revenues are presented net of VAT.

Until December 31, 2017 (IAS 18 implementation) revenues were measured in accordance with the fair value of the consideration received or receivable in respect of sales supplied in the ordinary course of business. Revenues arewere presented net of value added tax, returns, rebates and discounts.

 

1)b)Sales of goods:Revenue recognition

 

Commencing January 1, 2018 (the initial implementation date of IFRS 15), the Group recognizes revenue when a customer obtains control over a promised goods or services. For each performance obligation the Group determines at contract inception whether it satisfies the performance obligation over time or satisfies the performance obligation at a point in time.

Performance obligations are satisfied over time if one of the following criteria is met:

(a) the customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits provided by the Group’s performance; (b) the Group’s performance creates or enhances an asset that the customer controls as the asset is created or enhanced; or (c) the Group’s performance does not create an asset with an alternative use to the Group and the Group has an enforceable right to payment for performance completed to date.

If a performance obligation is not satisfied over time, a Group satisfies the performance obligation at a point in time.

The transaction price is allocated to each distinct performance obligations on a relative standalone selling price (“SSP”) basis and revenue is recognized for each performance obligation when control has passed. In most cases, the Company is able to establish SSP based on the observable prices of services sold separately in comparable circumstances to similar customers and for products based on the Company’s best estimates of the price at which the Company would have sold the product regularly on a stand-alone basis. The Company reassesses the SSP on a periodic basis or when facts and circumstances change.


MEDIGUS LTD.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 2 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES(continued):

Product Revenue

Revenues from product sales of miniature cameras are recognized when the customer obtains control of the Company’s product, typically upon shipment to the customer. Taxes collected from customers relating to product sales and remitted to governmental authorities are excluded from revenues.

Service Revenue

The Company also generates revenues from development services. Revenue from development services is recognized over the period of the applicable service contract. There are no long-term payment terms or significant financing components of the Company’s contracts.

The Company’s contract payment terms for product and services vary by customer. The Company assesses collectability based on several factors, including collection history. 

Until December 31, 2017 revenue from the sale of goods is recognized when all of the following conditions are met:

 

The Group transferred the significant risks and rewards of ownership of the goods to the purchaser;

 
The Group does not retain continuing managerial involvement to the degree usually associated with ownership nor effective control over the goods sold;

 
The amount of the revenue can be measured reliably. The amount of the revenue is not considered as being reliably measured until all the conditions relating to the transaction are met. The Group bases its estimates on past experience, considering the type of customer, type of transaction and special details of each arrangement;

 
It is probable that the economic benefits that are associated with the transaction will flow to the Group; and

 
The costs incurred or to be incurred in respect of the transaction can be measured reliably.

 

F-17

MEDIGUS LTD.

 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

NOTE 2 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES(continued):

 

2)Construction contracts:

A construction contract is defined by IAS 11, “Construction contracts”, as a contract specifically negotiated for the construction of an asset.

When the outcome of a construction contract can be estimated reliably and it is probable that the contract will be profitable, the revenue and the associated costs recognized over the contract period by reference to the stage of completion. The Group recognizes expected loss immediately once concluded that it’s probable.

When the outcome of a construction contract cannot be estimated reliably, the Group recognizes revenue only to the extent of contract costs incurred that it is probable will be recoverable.

Variations in contract work, claims and incentive payments are included in contract revenue to the extent that may have been agreed with the customer and are capable of being reliably measured.

The Group uses the “percentage-of-completion method” to determine the appropriate amount to recognize in a given period. The stage of completion is measured by reference to the contract costs incurred up to the end of the reporting period as a percentage of total estimated costs for each contract. Costs incurred in the period in connection with the future activities on a contract are excluded from contract costs in determining the stage of completion.

The Group classified the net contract position for each contract as either an asset or a liability as part of the balance sheet. Net contract classified as an asset when the incurred costs plus recognized profits (less recognized losses) exceed progress billings and as a liability if otherwise.

o.Leases

 

Lease agreements in whichGroup as lessee:

Through December 31, 2018 the Group applied IAS 17 to account for leases whereby a significant portion of the risks and rewards of ownership arewere retained by the lessor arewere classified as operating leases. Payments made in connection withTherefore the Group’s leases were operating leases are recognized in profit or loss using thewhich were charged to income statements on a straight-line basis over the lease term, including extending options which were reasonably certain.

IFRS 16 replaces upon first-time implementation the existing guidance in IAS 17. The standard sets out the principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of leases, and is expected to impact mainly the accounting treatment applied by the lessee in a lease transaction.

IFRS 16 changes the existing guidance in IAS 17 and requires lessees to recognize a lease liability that reflects future lease payments and a “right-of-use asset” in all lease contracts (except for the following), with no distinction between financing and capital leases. IFRS 16 exempts lessees in short-term leases or the when underlying asset has a low value.

IFRS 16 also changes the definition of a “lease” and the manner of assessing whether a contract contains a lease.

The Group adopted IFRS 16 on January 1, 2019, using a modified retrospective transition approach, and as a result did not adjust prior periods. The effect upon first-time implementation on the Group’s consolidated statement of financial position are: right-of-use lease assets of approximately $39 thousand, current lease liabilities of approximately $30 thousand and non-current lease liabilities of approximately $9 thousand.

In respect of agreements in which the Group is the lessee, the Group elected to apply the standard for the first time by recognizing lease liabilities, for leases that were previously classified as operating leases, based on the present value of the lease.remaining lease payments, discounted at the incremental interest rate of the lessee as at the date of first-time application. At the same time, the Group recognized a right-of-use asset at an amount equal to the amount of the lease liabilities, adjusted to reflect any prepaid or accrued lease payments in respect of those leases. As a result, the application of the standard has no an effect on the accumulated deficit balance.

The Group applied the following practical expedients:

 

p.Non-lease components: practical expedient by class of underlying asset not to separate non-lease components (services) from lease components and, instead, account for each lease component and any associated non lease components as a single lease component.
The practical expedient for short-term leases is applied.

As part of the first-time application of the standard, the Group has elected to apply the following practical expedients:

Excluding initial direct costs for the measurement of the right-of-use asset at the date of initial application,

Using hindsight in determining the lease term where the contract contains options to extend or terminate the lease

For leases in which the Group is the lessee, the Group does not to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability in respect of leases whose lease period ends within 12 months of the date of initial application.

Not to reassess whether a contract is, or contains a lease at the date of initial application. Instead, for contracts entered into before the transition date the Group relied on its assessment made applying IAS 17

Discount rate: 

The lease payments are discounted using the lessee’s incremental borrowing rate, since the interest rate implicit in the lease cannot be readily determined. The lessee’s incremental borrowing rate is the rate that the individual lessee would have to pay to borrow the funds necessary to obtain an asset of similar value to the right-of-use asset in a similar economic environment with similar terms, security and conditions. However, the Group is using the practical expedient of accounting together a portfolio of leases with similar characteristics provided that it is reasonably expected that the effects on the financial statements of applying this standard to the portfolio would not differ materially from applying this Standard to the individual leases within that portfolio. And using a single discount rate to a portfolio of leases with reasonably similar characteristics (such as leases with a similar remaining lease term for a similar class of underlying asset in a similar economic environment). The weighted average of lessee’s incremental annual borrowing rate applied to the lease liabilities was 10%.

Lease liabilities measurement:

Lease liabilities were initially measured on a present value basis of the following lease payments:

fixed payments (including in-substance fixed payments), less any lease incentives receivable

variable lease payment that are based on an index or a rate (such as CPI).

lease payments (principal and interest) to be made under reasonably certain extension options

MEDIGUS LTD.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 2 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES(continued):

The lease liability is subsequently measured according to the effective interest method, with interest costs recognized in the statement of income as incurred. The amount of lease liabilities is increased to reflect the accretion of interest and reduced for the lease payments made. In addition, the carrying amount of lease liabilities is remeasured if there is a modification, a change in the lease term, a change in the lease payments (e.g., changes to future payments resulting from a change in an index or rate used to determine such lease payments) or a change in the assessment of an option to purchase the underlying asset.

The Group is exposed to potential future changes in lease payments based on linkage to the CPI index, which are not included in the lease liability until they take effect. When adjustments to lease payments based on an index or rate take effect, the lease liability is reassessed and adjusted against the right-of-use asset.

Principal elements of the lease payments are presented in the statement of cash flows under the cash used in financing activities. Finance cost of the lease payments are presented in the statement of cash flows under the operating activities.

Right-of-use assets measurement:

Right-of-use assets were measured at cost comprising the following:

the amount of the initial measurement of lease liability;
any lease payments made at or before the commencement date and;
any initial direct costs (except for initial application).

After the commencement date, the Group measures the right-of-use asset applying the cost model, less any accumulated depreciation and any accumulated impairment losses and adjusted for any remeasurement of the lease liability.

Assets are depreciated by the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the right of use assets or the lease period, which is shorter:

Years
Property1-2
Motor vehicles3

p.Loss per share

 

Loss per share is based on the loss that is attributed to the shareholders holding ordinary shares, divided by the weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue during the period.

 

For purposes of the calculation of the diluted loss per share, the Group adjusts the loss that is attributed to the holders of the Company’s ordinary shares, and the weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue, to assume conversion of all of the dilutive potential shares.

 

The potential shares are taken into account only if their effect is dilutive (increases loss per share).

 

F-18

MEDIGUS LTD.

 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

NOTE 2 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES(continued):

 

q.New international financial reporting standards, amendments to standards and new interpretations:Classification of liabilities:

 

Standards, amendmentsThe IASB issued a narrow-scope amendment to IAS 1 to clarify that liabilities are classified as either current or non-current, depending on the rights that exist at the end of the reporting period. The amendment could affect the classification of liabilities, particularly for entities that previously considered management’s intentions to determine classification and interpretations to existing standards which are not yet effective and have not been early adopted byfor some liabilities that can be converted into equity. Inter alia, the Group:amendment requires the following: 

 

a)International Financial Reporting Standard 9 “Financial Instruments” (hereinafter – “IFRS 9” or “the Standard”):Liabilities are classified as non-current if the entity has a substantive right to defer settlement for at least 12 months at the end of the reporting period. The amendment no longer refers to unconditional rights. The assessment determines whether a right exists, but it does not consider whether the entity will exercise the right.

IFRS 9 deals with the classification, measurement and recognition of financial assets and financial liabilities. The full version of IFRS 9 was published in July 2014. This Standard replaces the present existing directives in International Accounting Standard 39 “Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement” (hereinafter – “IAS 39”) regarding the classification and measurement of financial instruments. IFRS 9 leaves the measurement model connected with measuring financial assets, but simplifies it and sets forth three main categories: amortized cost, fair value through other comprehensive income and fair value through profit or loss. The classification is based on the business model of the entity and on characteristics of the contractual cash flows of the financial asset. Investments in capital instruments will be measured at fair value through profit or loss. Nevertheless, the entity’s management can choose, on the date of initial recognition, irrevocably, to present the changes in fair value of an investment in a capital instrument in other comprehensive income, without recycling them to profit or loss.

The Standard presents a new model for an impairment of financial instruments, based on the Expected Credit Loss Model. This model replaces the existing model in IAS 39, which is based on the Incurred Loss Model. The new impairment model requires the recognition of impairment provisions based on expected credit losses (hereinafter – “ECL”) rather than only incurred credit losses as is the case under IAS 39. It applies to financial assets classified at amortized cost, debt instruments measured at fair value in other comprehensive income and contract assets under IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The new model, may result in an earlier recognition of credit losses.

Regarding classification and measurement of financial liabilities, there were no changes, excluding the recognition of changes in the fair value of liabilities designated to the fair value through “profit or loss” category, resulting from the entity’s own credit risk, in other comprehensive income.

The Standard will be implemented retrospectively as from annual periods starting January 1, 2018. The Group will implement IFRS 9 commencing January 1, 2018. According to the provisions of IFRS 9 it may be implemented earlier. The Group has assessed IFRS 9’s potential impacts on its consolidated financial statements and concluded that the implementation will not have a material effect.

 

b)International Financial Reporting Standard 15 “Revenues from Contracts’Settlement’ is defined as the extinguishment of a liability with Customers” (hereinafter – “IFRS 15”).

IFRS 15 will replace, on its first implementation, the directives on the subject of recognizing revenues existing today under International Financial Reporting Standards.

The core principle of IFRS 15 is that revenues from contracts with customers must be recognized in a way that reflects the transfer of control of goods or services supplied to customers in the framework of the contracts by amounts which reflect the proceeds that the entity expects that it will be entitled to receive for those goods or services.

F-19

MEDIGUS LTD.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 2 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES(continued):

IFRS 15 sets forth a single model for recognizing revenues, according to which the entity will recognize revenues according to the said core principle by implementing five stages:

(1)Identifyingcash, other economic resources or an entity’s own equity instruments. There is an exception for convertible instruments that might be converted into equity, but only for those instruments where the contract(s) with the customer.
(2)Identifying theconversion option is classified as an equity instrument as a separate performance obligations in the contract.
(3)Determining the transaction price.
(4)Allocating the transaction price to separate performance obligations in the contract.
(5)Recognizing revenue when (or as) eachcomponent of the performance obligations is satisfied.a compound financial instrument.

 

The Standard willamendment should be implementedapplied retrospectively as from annual periods starting January 1, 2018.

The Group has established a team to examine the expected effects of the application of IFRS 15 on its consolidated financial statements. The Group intends to apply IFRS 15 on the date it becomes effective as from the first quarter of 2018, in accordance with the transitional directive, which allows recognition of the cumulative effect of the initial application as an adjustment to the opening balance of equity of initial application.

Based on such examination, management concluded that the implementation of IFRS 15 will not have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

c)International Financial Reporting Standard 16 “Leases” (hereafter – “IFRS 16”).

IFRS 16,Leases, which replaces the current guidance in IAS 17. IFRS 16 requires lessees, with certain exceptions, to recognize a lease liability reflecting future lease payments and a ‘right-of-use asset’ for lease contracts. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2019, with earlier2022. Earlier application permitted if IFRS 15,Revenue from Contracts with Customer, is also applied. The Group is yet to assess IFRS 16’s full impact.permitted.

 

F-20

TableThe Group early adopted the narrow-scope amendment to IAS 1.  Accordingly, the Group classified in the statement of Contentsfinancial position warrants as part of current liabilities. The amendment was applied retrospectively and as a result the Group reclassified warrants at fair value as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 amounting to $1,601 thousand and $559 thousand, respectively, to current liabilities.

 


MEDIGUS LTD.

 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

NOTE 3 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND JUDGMENTS:

 

The preparation of consolidated financial statements under IFRS requires the Group to make estimates and judgements that affect the application of policies and reported amounts. Estimates and judgements are continually evaluated and are based on historical experience and other factors including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

 

Included in this note are accounting judgments and/or estimates which cover areas that the Directors and Management consider to have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amount of assets and liabilities in the future:

 

a.Deferred tax assets

 

Based on management’s judgment, no deferred tax assets have been recorded in the Group’s books of accounts for current losses carried forward for tax purposes since it is not probable that the Group will be able to utilize those losses in the foreseeable future against taxable income as of December 31, 2017.2019. The deferred tax asset in connection with the accumulated losses for tax purposes (which was not recorded due to the reason mentioned above) aggregated to approximately USD 1617 million.

 

b.Fair value measurement of share-based payment transactions

 

The Company granted several equity-settled share based compensation plans to the Group’s employees and other service providers in connection with their service to the Group. The fair value of the share options is measured at grant date on the basis of accepted valuation models and assumptions regarding unobservable inputs used in the valuation models. The fair value mentioned above is expensed to the statement of loss and other comprehensive loss during the vesting period and concurrently recorded as capital reserves from options granted within the consolidated statement of changes in equity.

 

c.Inventory impairment

 

The Company continually evaluates inventory for potential loss due to excess quantity or obsolete or slow-moving inventory by comparing sales history and sales projection to the inventory on hand. When evidence indicates that the carrying value of a product may not be recoverable, a charge is recorded to reduce the inventory to its current net realizable value. During 2017,2018, the Company recorded in its books an inventory impairment of $297$ 328 thousands, charged to cost of revenues.

 


MEDIGUS LTD.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 3 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND JUDGMENTS(continued):

d.Fair value measurement of warrantsfinancial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit or loss

 

Receipts from investorsAs described in respectNote 4, the Company signed an agreement with Algomizer Ltd. As part of warrants are classified as equity to the extent that they conferagreement the right to purchase a fixed number of shares for a fixed exercise price. In the event that the exercise price is not deemed to be fixed, the warrants are classified as non-current liability. This liability initially recognized at its fair value on the issue date and subsequently accounted for at fair value at each reporting date. The fair value changes are charged to profit from changes in fair value of warrants issued to investors on the statement of comprehensive loss.Company received several financial assets. The fair value of this financial assets classified at FVTPL, which are not traded on an active market, is determined by using a level 3 valuation technique, see note 5.

In addition, the Company issued in previous years warrants to investors which include a cashless exercise mechanism and as a result did not meet the fixed-for-fixed criteria to be classified as an equity instrument. The fair value of this warrants classified at financial liabilities through profit or loss, which are not traded on an active market, is determined by using a level 3 valuation technique, see note 5.

The fair value of this financial assets and liabilities is measured at issue date on the basis of accepted valuation models and assumptions regarding unobservable inputs used in the valuation models.

F-21

MEDIGUS LTD.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 3 – SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND JUDGMENTS(continued):loss and other comprehensive loss.

   

e.Considering the likelihood of contingent losses and quantifying possible settlements:

 

Provisions are recorded when a loss is considered probable and can be reasonably estimated. Judgment is necessary in assessing the likelihood that a pending claim or litigation against the Group will succeed, or a liability will arise, quantifying the possible range of final settlement. These judgments are made by management with the support of internal specialists or with the support of outsource consultants such as legal counsel. Because of the inherent uncertainties in this evaluation process, actual results may be different from these estimates.

 

f.Listing expenses:

The reverse recapitalization transaction conducted at ScoutCam Ltd.’s level was accounted for in the Group’s consolidated financial statements as a transaction with non-controlling interest in which the Company consolidated INLL’s net assets in consideration equal to the fair value of the shares INLL had to issue to Medigus as part of the reverse recapitalization transaction. The fair value could not be determined based on INLL’s stock market value since the trading volume of INLL’s common stock was nil. Therefore, the Company determined the fair value of the transaction based on the pre-money valuation of INLL which was taken into account as part of the Issuance of Units to External Investors as mentioned above.


MEDIGUS LTD.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 4 - INTEREST IN OTHER ENTITIES:

Material subsidiaries:

On September 16, 2019, the Company entered into a Securities Exchange Agreement (the “Exchange Agreement”), with ScoutCam Inc,formally known as Intellisense Solutions Inc (“Intellisense”), pursuant to which the Company assigned, transferred and delivered 100% of its holdings in ScoutCam to ScoutCam Inc, in exchange for consideration consisting of shares of ScoutCam’s Inc. common stock representing 60% of the issued and outstanding share capital of ScoutCam Inc. immediately upon the closing of the Exchange Agreement (the “Closing”). The Exchange Agreement was conditioned on certain obligations by the respective parties, including, but not limited to, that ScoutCam Inc. will have at least USD 3 million in cash on hand upon Closing, and that ScoutCam Inc. will bear the costs and expenses in connection with the execution of the Exchange Agreement. In accordance with said obligations, ScoutCam Inc. undertook to secure at least USD 3 million in funding prior to the Closing, based on a pre-money valuation of USD 10 million on a post-Closing basis. In addition, the Exchange Agreement provides that if ScoutCam achieves an aggregated amount of USD 33 million in sales within the first three years immediately after the Closing, ScoutCam Inc. will issue to the Company additional shares representing 10% of ScoutCam’s Inc. issued and outstanding share capital as reflected on the date of the Closing.

The Closing occurred on December 30, 2019 (the “Closing Date”). Pursuant to the Exchange Agreement, Intellisense issued to Medigus 16,130,952 share. Upon such issuance, ScoutCam Ltd. became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Intellisense. On December 31, 2019, Intellisense Solutions Inc. changed its name to ScoutCam Inc.

Also on the Closing Date, 3,413,312 units, each comprised of two shares of common stock par value USD 0.001 per share, one Warrant A (as defined below) and two Warrants B (as defined below), were issued to investors as part of the financing transaction that the ScoutCam Inc. was obligated to secure prior to the closing. The immediate gross proceeds from the issuance of the units amounted to approximately USD 3.3 million (the “Issuance of Units to External Investors”).

Each Warrant A is exercisable into one share of common stock of ScoutCam Inc. at an exercise price of USD 0.595 per share during the12 month period following the allotment. Each Warrant B is exercisable into one share of common stock of ScoutCam Inc. at an exercise price of USD 0.893 per share during the 18 month period following the allotment.

In addition, Shrem Zilberman Group Ltd (the “Consultant”) will be entitled to receive the amount representing 3% of any exercise price of each Warrant A or Warrant B that may be exercised in the future. In the event the total proceeds received as a result of exercise of Warrants will be less than $2 million at the time of their expiration, the Consultant will be required to invest $250,000 in ScoutCam Inc. 


MEDIGUS LTD.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 4 - INTEREST IN OTHER ENTITIES(continued):

While ScoutCam Inc. was the legal acquirer, ScoutCam Ltd. was treated as the acquiring company for accounting purposes as the Exchange Agreement was accounted for as a reverse recapitalization conducted at ScoutCam Ltd.’s level. Accordingly, the accounting treatment is equivalent to the issuance of 10,753,969 shares by ScoutCam Ltd, for the net monetary assets of ScoutCam Inc. The net acquired assets of the ScoutCam Inc. as of the Closing Date was $3,040 thousands. There were no fair value adjustments necessary to perform as the carrying values of the net acquired assets approximated fair value. Further, given the nature of the operations of ScoutCam Inc. prior to the Closing Date, there were no intangible assets, including goodwill, established as a result of the Exchange Agreement.

Listing expenses are presented in the Company’s consolidated statement of loss and comprehensive loss for the period ended December 31, 2019 in connection with the reverse recapitalization.

The reverse recapitalization transaction conducted at ScoutCam Ltd.’s level was accounted for in the Group’s consolidated financial statements as a transaction with non-controlling interest in which the Company consolidated INLL’s net assets in consideration equal to the fair value of the shares INLL had to issue to Medigus as part of the reverse recapitalization transaction. The fair value could not be determined based on INLL’s stock market value as there is currently no trading market for INLL’s Common Stock and there is no assurance that a regular trading market will ever develop. The Company concluded to determine the fair value based on a pre-money valuation attributed to INLL as part of the Issuance of Units to External Investors as mentioned above. In accordance, an amount of USD 10,098 thousand was listed in the consolidated statement of loss and comprehensive loss as listing expenses. Furthermore, the Company recorded a capital reserve of $11,714 thousand resulting from the transaction with non-controlling interest.

Non-controlling interests (NCI)

Set out below is summarized financial information for ScoutCam Inc. that has non-controlling interest that are material to the Group. The amounts are before inter-company eliminations.

Summarized balance sheet

December 31,
2019
USD in thousands
Currents assets4,318
Current liabilities1,910
Current net assets2,408
Non-current assets439
Non-current liabilities325
Non-current net assets114
Net assets2,522
Accumulated non-controlling interests1,424

Summarized statement of comprehensive income

Year ended
December 31,
2019
USD in thousands
Revenues309
Loss for the period(11,927)
Net loss attributable to the NCI-


MEDIGUS LTD.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 4 - INTEREST IN OTHER ENTITIES(continued):

Summarized statement of cash flows: 

Cash flow used in operating activities(1,799)
Cash flow used in investing activities(55)
Cash flow from financing activities5,104
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents3,250

Investments accounted for using the equity method

On June 19, 2019 the Company signed an agreement with Algomizer Ltd. (“Algomizer”) and its wholly-owned subsidiary Linkury Ltd. (together the “Algomizer Group”), for an investment of approximately $5 million in Algomizer Group (the “Investment Agreement”). The investment was subject to certain pre-conditions, which were met at September 3, 2019 (“Closing Date”). As part of the Investment Agreement:

a.Medigus received 2,168,675 ordinary shares of Algomizer (Algomizer shares).

b.Medigus received 729,508 ordinary shares of Linkury Ltd (“Linkury’s shares”).

c.Medigus received 2,898,183 warrants to purchase 2,898,183 Algomizer shares at an exercise price of NIS 5.25 per share (“Algomizer Warrants”).

d.Medigus’ investment in Algomizer and Linkury is based on a projection that Linkury’s net profit for 2019 will be at least NIS 15 million. In the event that Linkury’s net income is less than NIS 15 million for 2019, Medigus will be issued with additional securities in Algomizer group, adjusting the price per Algomizer group securities to the actual net profit for 2019, and compensating Medigus for the difference between the actual net profit and the target net profit for 2019 (“Reverse earn out”). Linkury net profit for 2019 was more than NIS 15 million.

e.Medigus is also entitled, for a period of three years following the closing of the investment, to convert any and all of its Linkury shares into Algomizer shares with a 20% discount over the average share price of Algomizer on TASE within the 60 trading days preceding the conversion (“Conversion Right”).

f.In the event, during the three year period following the closing of the investment, Algomizer shall issue, or under take to issue ordinary shares with a price per share or exercise per share lower NIS 4.15 (the (“Reduced Per Share Purchase Price”), Algomizer shall be allocated immediately with such amounts of additional Ordinary Shares (and the Algomizer Warrant shall be adjusted accordingly) equal to the difference of (x) the amount of ordinary shares actually received by the Company under the Investment Agreement, and (y) the amount which Medigus would have otherwise received should the Reduced Per Share Purchase Price was applied (“Anti-dilution”).

MEDIGUS LTD.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 4 - INTEREST IN OTHER ENTITIES(continued):

In consideration for the assets as described above Medigus:

a.Paid NIS 14,400,000 at cash (approximately USD 4,057 thousands).

b.Issued to Algomizer 333,334 ADS representing 6,666,680 ordinary shares.

c.

Issued to Algomizer 333,334 warrants to purchase 333,334 ADS representing 6,666,680 ordinary shares at an exercise price of USD 4 per warrant.

On September 3, 2019 the Company acquired 8.45% of the issued shares of Algomizer Ltd and 9.34% of the issued shares of Linkury Ltd. As part of the investment, Medigus appointed two directors to the board of directors of Algomizer, therefore, Medigus achieved a significant influence in Algomizer. Medigus does not have a significant influence in Linkury. Therefore, investment on Linkury’s shares accounted as financial asset in fair value through profit or loss and investment on Algomizer’s shares accounted for using the equity method.

The difference between the fair value of consideration paid by the Company and the fair value of Linkury’s shares, Algomizer warrants, Reverse earn-out, Conversion right and Anti-dilution was attributed to Algomizer shares.

Two of the Company’s members of the board of directors hold less than 5% each in Algomizer Ltd. Furthermore, the same directors hold less than 5% each in a subsidiary company of Algomizer Ltd.

To the best of the Company’s knowledge, Algomizer Ltd. used the investment funds to finance its ongoing operations and for an early repayment of a loan previously organized and partially provided by an affiliated company related to one of Company’s shareholders or by such shareholder in connection with the acquisition of Linkury.

Name of entity Place of business/country of incorporation % of ownership interest as of December 31, 2019  Nature of relationship Measurement method Quoted fair value as of December 31, 2019  Carrying amount as of December 31, 2019 
           USD in thousands 
Algomizer Ltd Israel  8.22%(*) Associate Equity method  1,537   1,149 

(*)After the acquisition, Algomizer issued options to employees, so the Company’s holding of Algomizer decreased from 8.45% to 8.22%

Algomizer Ltd, through its subsidiary Linkury, is engaged in internet marketing including: Internet video and imaging, website monetization and search engines and automated tools for internet advertising.

The table below provide summarized financial information for Algomizer.

Summarized balance sheet:

December 31,
2019
USD in thousands (*)
Currents assets
Cash and cash equivalents3,712
Other current assets7,285
Total current assets10,997
Non-current assets9,201
Current liabilities
Financial liabilities (excluding trade payables)1,270
Other current liabilities8,375
Total current liabilities9,645
Non-current liabilities
Financial liabilities (excluding trade payables)800
Other non-current liabilities2,310
Total non-current liabilities3,110
Net assets7,443
Equity attributable to Algomizer shareholders2,388
Non-controlling interests5,055

MEDIGUS LTD.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 4 - INTEREST IN OTHER ENTITIES(continued):

USD in thousands
Reconciliation to carrying amounts:
Equity attributable to Algomizer shareholders' as of September 3, 20193,061
Loss attributable to Algomizer shareholders' for the period(3,070)
Other comprehensive loss attributable to Algomizer shareholders' for the period(527)
Increase in capital reverse2,924
2,388
Equity attributable to Algomizer shareholders' as of December 31, 20192,388
Groups share in %8.22%
Group share (USD)196
Fair value adjustments953
Carrying amount1,149

Summarized statement of comprehensive income:

September 4, 2019 - December 31, 2019
USD in thousands (**)
Revenue12,081
Gross profit3,252
Loss for the period(3,153)
Other comprehensive loss(609)
Total comprehensive loss(3,762)

(*)translated at the closing rate at the date of that balance sheet
(**)translated at average exchange rates for the period


MEDIGUS LTD.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 45 - FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT:

 

Financial risk management:

 

1)Financial risk factors

 

The Group is exposed to a variety of financial risks such as: market risks (including currency risks, fair value interest rate risk, cash flow interest rate risk and price risk), credit risks and liquidity risks. The Group’s overall risk management plan focuses on the unpredictability of financial markets and seeks to minimize the potential adverse effects on the Group’s financial performance.

 

Risk management is performed by the finance department according to the policy authorized by the board of directors.

 

a)Market risk - Currency risk

 

Currency risk is the risk that the value of financial instruments will fluctuate due to changes in foreign exchange rates.

 

The Group operates internationally and is exposed to foreign exchange risks due to exposure to foreign currencies, primarily the NIS. Foreign exchange risk arises from future commercial transactions, assets or liabilities denominated in foreign currency.

 

The Group’s policy to reduce the exposure to changes in exchange rates is based on maintaining, where possible, the balances of current monetary assets, according to the currency of the current liabilities.

 

As of December 31, 2017,2019, if the Group’s functional (USD) had weakened/strengthened by 10% against the NIS, with all other variables held constant, the loss for the year would increase/decreasedecrease/increase by USD 2427 thousand (the effect for 20162018 was an increase/increase by USD 244 thousand and 2015the effect for 2017 was a decrease/increase by USD 32 thousand and USD 308 thousand, respectively)24 thousand).

F-22

MEDIGUS LTD.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 4 - FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT (continued):

 

b)Credit risk

 

Credit risk arises when a failure by counterparties to discharge their obligations could reduce the amount of future cash inflows from financial assets on hand at the end of the reporting year.

 

Credit risks are treated at the Group level. Credit risks arise typically from cash and cash equivalents, bank deposits and from credit exposures in connection with outstanding receivables and committed transactions.

 

No credit limits were exceeded during the reported periods and Group’s management does not expect any losses from non-performance of these parties.


MEDIGUS LTD.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 5 - FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT (continued):

 

c)Liquidity risk

 

Liquidity risk exists where the Group might encounter difficulties in meeting its financial obligations as they become due. The Group monitors its liquidity in order to ensure that sufficient liquid resources are available to allow it to meet its obligations.

 

Cash flow forecasting is performed by the Group’s finance department. The finance department monitors rolling forecasts of the Group’s liquidity requirements to ensure that it has sufficient cash to meet operational needs, while maintaining sufficient headroom on its undrawn committed borrowing facilities, so that the Group does not breach any of its credit facilities.

 

The Group invests cash surpluses in interest bearing investments such as time deposits and short-term government debentures, choosing instruments with appropriate maturities or sufficient liquidity to provide sufficient headroom as determined by the above-mentioned forecasts.

 

Liquidity risk arises from financial liabilities due to payable balances (except for institutions and advanced payments) and amounted to USD 8961,435 thousands on December 31, 20172019 (December 31, 20162018 - USD 1,1411,131 thousands).

 

These liabilities are classified as current liabilities, and are expected to mature within 12 months following the balance sheet date.date, unless payment is not due within 12 months after the reporting period.

 

2)Estimates of fair value

  

The followingBelow is an analysis of theanalyzes financial instruments measuredcarried at fair value, according toby valuation methods. Inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs) (Level 3).method. The different levels have been defined as follows:

 

 F-23Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1).

 Inputs other than quoted prices included within level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly (that is, as prices) or indirectly (that is, derived from prices) (level 2).

Inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (that is, unobservable inputs) (level 3).

F-36

 

MEDIGUS LTD.

 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

NOTE 45 - FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT (continued):

 

The following table presents theFinancial assets

Level 1 and level 2 financial assets and liabilities that were measured at fair value asinstruments:

As of December 31, 20172019 and 2016:December 31, 2018 the Group has no financial assets measured at level 1 or level 2.

 

   December 31 
   2017  2016 
   Level 3  Total  Level 3  Total 
   USD in thousands 
 Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss -            
 Fair value of warrants  1,028   1,028   237   237 
 Unrecognized Day 1 loss  (469)  (469)  -   - 
 Warrants, net  559   559   237   237 

Financial instruments in levelLevel 3 financial instruments:

 

The Group’sCompany has several financial liabilityassets measured at fair value through profit or loss, iswhich meet the obligation for warrants (series E), warrants (series I), warrants (series A) and warrants (series L)level 3 criteria as of December 31, 2019 (see Note 13(b)note 4).

 

   December 31 
   2017  2016 
   Standard deviation  Risk-free interest  Fair value (USD thousands)  Standard deviation  Risk-free interest  Fair value (USD thousands) 
 Warrants (Series L)  63.47%  0.97%  228             
 Warrants (Series A)  66.72%  0.56%  325             
 Warrants (Series I)  65.74%  0.70   6   155.39%  1.26%  237 
 Warrants (Series E)              155.39%  0.00%  - 

As part of calculating the warrants fair value by utilizing the Black and Scholes model, if the change in standard deviation for that warrants shifted +5%, the impact on profit or loss would be USD 93 thousand. If the change in standard deviation for that warrants shifted -5%, the impact on profit or loss would be USD 186 thousand. The higher the standard deviation, the higher the fair value. The expected volatility is based on fluctuations in the price of the Company’s share.

On August 25, 2017 the warrants (Series E) expired as the exercise period was ended and the holders did not exercise such warrants.

 F-24Fair value measurements based on unobservable data (level 3):

The following table presents the level 3 fair value financial assets as of December 31, 2019:

December 31,
2019
Level 3
USD in thousands
Linkury’s shares2,637
Algomizer Warrants71
Reverse earn-out0
Conversion Right619
Anti-dilution289
3,616 

 

MEDIGUS LTD.

 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

  

NOTE 45 - FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT (continued):

 

The following table presents the Level 3 instrumentsfinancial assets roll-forward during 2017:2019:

  Linkury’s shares  Algomizer Warrants  Reverse
earn out
  Conversion Right  Anti-dilution  Total 
  USD in thousands 
Balance as of January 1, 2019  -   -   -   -   -   - 
Initial recognition of financial asset  2,501   162   13   617   231   3,524 
Changes in fair value recognized within profit or loss  136   (91)  (13)  2   58   92 
Balance as of December 31, 2019  2,637   71   -   619   289   3,616 

Total unrealized profits for the period included in profit or loss for assets held at the end of the reporting period amounted to USD 105 thousand.

Financial liabilities

Level 1 financial instruments:

As of December 31, 2019 and December 31,2018 the Group has financial liability measured at level 1 – Warrants C (see note 13(b)(3)).

The fair value of financial instruments traded in active markets is based on quoted market prices at the balance sheet date. A market is regarded as active if quoted prices are readily and regularly available from an exchange, dealer, broker, industry group, pricing service, or regulatory agency, and those prices represent actual and regularly occurring market transactions on an arm’s length basis.

Level 3 financial instruments:

The Company has several financial liabilities measured at fair value through profit or loss, which meet the level 3 criteria as of December 31, 2019 – warrants issued to investors (see note 13(b)(1)-(2)). 

 

F-38

MEDIGUS LTD.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 5 - FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT (continued):

The following table presents the financial liabilities that were measured at fair value as of December 31, 2019 and 2018:

  December 31 
  2019  2018 
  Level 1  Level 3  Total  Level 1  Level 3  Total 
  USD in thousands 
Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss -                  
Fair value of warrants  1,419   100   1,519   1,504   444   1,948 
Unrecognized Day 1 loss (see note 13)  -   (60)  (60)  -   (347)  (347)
Warrants, net  1,419   40   1,459   1,504   97   1,601 

The following table presents the Level 3 financial liabilities roll-forward during 2019:

  Warrants 
  USD in thousands
Opening balance as of January 1, 201997
Changes in fair value of warrants issued to investors(57)
Closing balance as of December 31, 201940

The following table presents the Level 3 financial liabilities roll-forward during 2018:

Warrants
 USD in thousands 
Opening balance as of January 1, 2018559
Granted (see note 13(b))6,681
Exercised(7,045)
Changes in fair value of warrants issued to investors(98)
Closing balance as of December 31, 201897

The following table presents the Level 3 financial liabilities roll-forward during 2017:

Warrants
USD in thousands
Opening balance as of January 1, 2017  237 
Granted (see note 13(b))  6,041 
Exercised  (2,217)
Profit from changesChanges in fair value of warrants issued to investors  (3,502)
Closing balance as of December 31, 2017  559 


MEDIGUS LTD.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 5 - FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT (continued):

Valuation processes of the Group: 

Set forth below are details regarding the valuation processes of the Group:

1)

Warrants which were issued on December 6, 2016, as part of a registered direct offering - the Company used the Black-Scholes model, using the following principal assumptions: expected volatility of 82.19%, risk-free interest of 0.23%, expected term of 5.5 years following the grant date. The liability amount is adjusted at each balance sheet date based on the then relevant assumptions, until the earlier of full exercise or expiration.

2)

Warrants which were issued on March 29, 2017, as part of a public offering - the Company used the Black-Scholes model, using the following principal assumptions: expected volatility of 84.49%, risk-free interest of 0.19%,expected term of 5 years following the grant date. The liability amount is adjusted at each balance sheet date based on the then relevant assumptions, until the earlier of full exercise or expiration. For details, see Note 13(b)(1).

3)

Warrants which were issued on November 28, 2017, as part of a direct offering - the Company used the Black-Scholes model, using the following principal assumptions: expected volatility of 85.23%, risk-free interest of 0.32%, expected term of 5.5 years following the grant date. The liability amount is adjusted at each balance sheet date based on the then relevant assumptions, until the earlier of full exercise or expiration. For details, see Note 13(b)(2).

4)Series C warrants - level 1 financial instruments measured at fair value through profit or loss. For details, see Note 13(b)(3).

5)

Linkury shares - the Company used the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model for a period of 7 years, using the following principal assumptions: weighted average cost of capital (WACC) – 20.9%. The asset amount is adjusted at each balance sheet date based on the then relevant assumptions. A shift of the WACC by +/- 5% results in a change in fair value of Linkury shares of $55 thousands. For details, see Note 4.

6)Total unrealized profitsAlgomizer warrants - the Company used the Black-Scholes model, using the following principal assumptions: expected volatility of 34.74%, risk-free interest of 0.24%, expected term of 3 years following the grant date. The asset amount is adjusted at each balance sheet date based on the then relevant assumptions, until the earlier of full exercise or expiration. For details, see Note 4.

7)

Anti-dilution - the Company used the Black-Scholes model, using the following principal assumptions: 25% probability for the period included in profit or loss for liabilities held atoccurrence of an anti-dilution event, expected volatility of 34.74%, risk-free interest of 0.24%, expected term of 3 years following the endissuance date. An increase of the reportingprobability for the occurrence of anti-dilution event by 10% would have increased the fair value of Anti-dilution by $116 thousands. For details, see Note 4.

8)Reverse earn out - the Company used the Monte Carlo model for a period of 0.32 years following the grant date, using the following principal assumptions: expected volatility 22.9%, risk-free interest 0.12%. For details, see Note 4.

9)

Conversion right - the Company used the Monte Carlo method for a period of 3 years following the grant date, using the following principal assumptions: expected volatility 34.74%, risk-free interest 0.24%. For details, see Note 4.

10)3,502Options to employees and advisors. For details, see Note 13(c).

 

The following table presents the Level 3 instruments roll-forward during 2016:F-40

Warrants
USD in thousands
Opening balance as of January 1, 20169
Granted (see note 13(b))253
Changes in fair value of warrants issued to investors(25)
Closing balance as of December 31, 2016237
Total unrealized profits for the period included in profit or loss for liabilities held at the end of the reporting period25

The following table presents the Level 3 instruments roll-forward during 2015:

Warrants
USD in thousands
Opening balance as of January 1, 2015110
Changes in fair value of warrants issued toinvestors(106)
Currency translation differences5
Closing balance as of December 31, 20159
Total unrealized profits for the period included in profit or loss for liabilities held at the end of the reporting period106

F-25

 

MEDIGUS LTD.

 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

NOTE 56 - CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:

 

   As of December 31 
   2017  2016 
   USD in thousands 
 Cash in banks  1,828   1,944 
 Short-term bank deposits  1,000   1,057 
    2,828   3,001 
  As of
December 31,
 
  2019  2018 
  USD in thousands 
Cash in banks  3,836   5,077 
Short-term bank deposits  3,200   5,548 
   7,036   10,625 

 

The currencies in which the cash and cash equivalents are denominated or to which they are linked are as follows:

 

   December 31 
   2017  2016 
   USD in thousands 
 USD  2,220   2,040 
 NIS  354   880 
 Other currencies  254   81 
    2,828   3,001 
  December 31 
  2019  2018 
  USD in thousands 
USD  6,658   7,591 
NIS  362   2,943 
Other currencies  16   91 
   7,036   10,625 

 

The carrying amount of the cash and cash equivalents approximates their fair value.

 

NOTE 6 -SHORT-TERM DEPOSIT:

Short-term deposit amounted to approximately USD 3.5 million as of December 31, 2017, including a bank deposit with a maturity period of up to 12 months.

The deposit bear interest of 1% per year.

NOTE 7 - OTHER RECEIVABLE:CURRENT ASSETS:

 

   December 31 
   2017  2016 
   USD in thousands 
        
 Institutions  56   70 
 Prepaid expenses*  225   277 
 Advances to suppliers  9   17 
 Other      2 
    290   366 
  December 31 
  2019  2018 
  USD in thousands 
       
Institutions  109   163 
Prepaid expenses  76   85 
Advances to suppliers  51   72 
Other  85   84 
   321   404 

 

*Such amount includes materials that were used to manufacture MUSE systems and MUSE systems which were used for testing, training, demonstrations and promotional activities aggregated to USD 177 thousand and USD 214 thousand as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The amount is charged to profit or loss based on usage and presented within research and development expenses or sales and marketing expenses based on the usage nature.

F-26

MEDIGUS LTD.

 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

NOTE 8 - INVENTORY:

 

Composed as follows:

 

   December 31 
   2017  2016 
   USD in thousands 
 Current assets:   
 Raw materials and supplies  67     
 Work in progress  79   128 
 Finished goods  34   70 
    180   198 
          
 Non-current assets:        
 Raw materials and supplies  557   829 
 Work in progress      66 
 Finished goods      39 
 Provision for impairment of  raw materials and supplies  (297)    
    260   934 
  December 31 
  2019  2018 
  USD in thousands 
Current assets:   
Raw materials and supplies  24   38 
Work in progress  316   43 
Finished goods  584   24 
Provision for impairment  (24)  (24)
   900   81 
         
Non-current assets:        
Raw materials and supplies  589   589 
Finished goods  12   12 
Provision for impairment of raw materials and supplies  (601)  (601)
   -   - 

 

F-27

MEDIGUS LTD.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 9 -PROPERTY- PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT:

 

a.Composition of property and equipment and accumulated depreciation thereon, grouped by major classifications and changes therein, and their movements during 2017:2019:

 

  Cost  Accumulated Depreciation    
  Balance
at the beginning
  Additions during
the
  Balance
at the
end of
  Balance
at the beginning
  Additions during
the
  Balance
at the
end of
  Depreciated
balance as of
December 31,
 
  of the year  year  the year  of the year  year  the year  2019  2018 
Property and equipment: USD in thousands  USD in thousands  USD in
thousands
 
Machinery and equipment  736   13   749   659   16   675   74   77 
Leasehold improvements  47   25   72   47   -   47   25   - 
Office furniture and equipment (including computers)  397   13   410   384   7   391   19   13 
Computer programs  158   11   169   143   7   150   19   15 
   1,338   62   1,400   1,233   30   1,263   137   105 

  Cost  Accumulated Depreciation    
  Balance at beginning  Additions during the  Balance at  Balance at beginning  Additions during the  Balance at  Depreciated balance
December 31,
 
  of year  year  end of year  of year  year  end of year  2017  2016 
Property and equipment: USD in thousands  USD in thousands  USD in thousands 
Machinery and equipment  736            736   609   30   639   97   127 
Leasehold improvements  47       47   41   6   47       6 
Office furniture and equipment (including computers)  391   2   393   346   24   370   23   45 
   1,174   2   1,176   996   60   1,056   120   178 

MEDIGUS LTD.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 9 - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT(continued):

  

b.Composition of property and equipment and accumulated depreciation thereon, grouped by major classifications and changes therein, and their movements during 2016:2018:

 

 Cost  Accumulated Depreciation      Cost  Accumulated Depreciation    
 Balance at beginning Additions during Balance at end Balance at beginning Additions during Balance at end of Depreciated balance
December 31,
  Balance
at the
beginning
  Additions during
the
  Balance
at the
end of
  Balance
at
beginning
  Additions
during
the
  Balance at the
end of
  Depreciated
balance as of
December 31,
 
 of year the year of year of year the year year 2016 2015  of the year  year  year  of the year  year  the year  2018  2017 
Property and equipment: USD in thousands  USD in thousands  USD in thousands  USD in thousands  USD in thousands  USD in
thousands
 
Machinery and equipment  712   24   736   557   52   609   127   155   736   -   736   639   20   659   77   97 
Leasehold improvements  47       47   36   5   41   6   11   47   -   47   47   -   47   -   - 
Office furniture and equipment (including computers)  383   8   391   323   23   346   45   60   393   4   397   370   14   384   13   23 
Computer programs  151   7   158   135   8   143   15   16 
  1,142   32   1,174   916   80   996   178   226   1,327   11   1,338   1,191   42   1,233   105   136 

 

NOTE 10 - LEASES:

F-28a.Right-of-use assets

  Cost  Accumulated Depreciation    
  Balance
at the
beginning
  Additions
during
the
  Deletions
during
the
  Balance
at the
end of
  

Balance
at the
beginning

  Additions
during
the
  Deletions
during
the
  Balance
at the
end of
  Depreciated
balance as of
December 31,
 
  of the year  year  year  the year  of the year  year  year  the year  2019  2018 
  USD in thousands  

 

USD in thousands

  USD in
thousands
 
Property  -   121   -   121   -   22   -   22   99   - 
Motor vehicles  39   53   (16)  76   -   23   (1)  22   54   - 
   39   174   (16)  197   -   45   (1)  44   153   - 

As of December 31, 2019, the weighted average remaining lease term for the Company’s leases was 1.46 years, and weighted-average discount rate was 10%.

F-43

 

MEDIGUS LTD.

 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

NOTE 10 - LEASES(continued):

b.Lease liabilities

  Balance at the beginning  Additions during the  Deletions during the  Interest expense during the  Payments during the  Balance at the end of 
  of the year  year  year  year  year  the year 
  USD in thousands 
Property  -   121   -   2   (22)  101 
Motor vehicles  39   53   (15)  3   (29)  51 
   39   174   (15)  5   (51)  152 

Composition of lease liabilities:

December 31, 2019
USD in thousands
Current lease liabilities:
Property97
Motor vehicles22
119
Non-current lease liabilities:
Property4
Motor vehicles29
33

c.Additional disclosure:

1)The Group leases it’s headquarter facilities in Omer, Israel, with a total of approximately 807 gross square meters. In January 2019 the company signed the agreement until the end of 2019. In November 2019 the company extended the agreement until the end of 2020. The rental payments are linked to the Israeli CPI.

2)The Company also leases a CEO’s office. Payments under the lease commenced on June 2019, and the initial term of the lease will expire in June 2020. The Company has options to extend the lease contract periods for up to two years (including the original lease periods). The extension option includes an increase of the lease payment of 5%. The monthly lease fee is NIS 4 thousand (approximately USD 1.1 thousands).

3)The Company has entered into operating lease agreements in connection with a number of vehicles. The lease periods are generally for three years.

4)In 2018 and 2017 rent expenses in amounts of USD 128 thousands and USD 157 thousands respectively were recorded according to the previous accounting policy under IAS 17.


MEDIGUS LTD.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 10 - LEASES(continued):

d) As of December 31, 2019, minimum future rental payments under the leases were:

Year Property  Motor vehicles  Total 
2020  101   28   129 
2021  6   20   26 
2022  -   14   14 
   107   62   169 

As of December 31, 2018, minimum future rental payments under the leases were:

Year Property  Motor vehicles  Total 
2019  80   30   110 
2020      9   9 
   80   39   119 

MEDIGUS LTD.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 11 - TAXES ON INCOME:

 

a.Corporate taxation in Israel:

 

1)Measurement of results for tax purposes:

Commencing with tax year 2008 the results of the Company for tax purposes are measured in nominal values. Through the end of tax year 2007 the results of the Company for tax purposes were measured having regard to the changes in the Israeli consumer price index (hereinafter - “CPI”), in accordance with the Income Tax Law (Inflationary Adjustments), 1985 (hereinafter - the “Inflationary Adjustments Law”). The transitional provisions regarding the discontinuation of the application of the Inflationary Adjustments Law stipulate that losses carried forward for tax purposes, deduction for depreciation, and real loss from sale of a depreciable asset or security will be linked to the CPI until the end of tax year 2007 and linkage shall be discontinued as of this date.

2)Tax rates

The income of the Company (other than income whichMedigus is eligible for reduced tax rates in accordance with encouragement laws in Israel, see C below) is subject to corporate taxtaxed at the regular corporate tax rates.

According to the Law for the Amendment of National Priorities (Legislative Amendments for Achieving the Budgetary Goals for 2013-2014), 2013 (hereinafter - the Law), which was published in the official gazette on August 2015, stipulated that thestandard Israeli corporate tax rate, will be 26.5%which was 24% for 2014 and thereafter. (As to the tax rates on the income of a Preferred Enterprise as set out in the Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments-1959, see C below).

In January 2016, published the Amendment of the Income Tax Ordinance (No. 216), 2016, which stipulated a reduction of the corporate tax, commencing 2016 and thereafter from 26.5% to 25%.

In December 2016, the Economic Efficiency Law (Legislative Amendments for Implementing the Economic Policy for the 2017 and 2018 Budget Year), 2016 was published, introducing a gradual reduction in corporate tax rate from 25% to 23%. However, the law also included a temporary provision setting the corporate tax rate in 2017 at 24%. As a result, the corporate tax rate will be 24% in 2017 and 23% infor 2018, 2019 and thereafter.

 

TheAs the Company has not created any deferred tax assets or liabilities, these changes have no effect on the Company’s capital gains are subject to tax at the regular corporate tax rates.financial statements.

 

b.Taxation of the Subsidiarythese subsidiaries:

 

The Subsidiary was incorporated in the United States and is subject to the Federal and State tax laws established in the United States.

1.The USA subsidiaries was incorporated in the United States and is subject to the Federal and State tax laws established in the United States.

 

On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Act”) was signed into law. The Act reduces the corporate tax rate to 21 percent from 35 percent, among other things. The Group doesAct did not expect that the Act will have a material effect on itsthe Group’s consolidated financial statements.

 

 F-292.ScoutCam Inc. did not timely file its tax return for 2013-2014 and therefore the IRS imposed penalties in the amount of USD 60 thousand (approximately USD 73 thousand including interest).

  

ScoutCam Inc. has not yet filed tax returns for 2015-2018.


MEDIGUS LTD.

 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

NOTE 1011 - TAXES ON INCOME(continued):

 

c.Encouragement laws in Israel:

 

Tax benefits under the Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments-1959 (hereinafter- the “Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments”):

 

a)1)General

 

Under the Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments, companies are entitled to various tax benefits by virtue of their “approved enterprise” or “benefited enterprise” status subject to the fulfillment of certain conditions. In addition, companies may be entitled to additional tax benefits as “foreign investors’ companies,” as defined by the Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments.

 

According to the Economic Policy Law for 2011 and 2012 (Legislative Amendments), 2011, which was published in December 2010 also amended the Capital Investment Encouragement Law (hereinafter – the amendment).

 

The amendementamendment sets alternative benefit tracks to the ones that were in place under the provisions of the Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments, as follows: investment grants track designed for enterprises located in national development zone A and two new tax benefits tracks (preferred enterprise and a special preferred enterprise), which provide for application of a unified tax rate to all preferred income of the company, as defined in the law.

 

Under the amended law, a company which qualifies for benefits under the encouragement law prior to the amendment thereof may opt for application of the amendment on each year, commencing with the first year in which the amendment became effective (2011) thereby making available to itself the tax benefits in accordance with the tracks set in the amendment subject to the fulfillment of certain conditions. A company’s election for application of the amendment is irrevocable and once it opts for application thereof, it will no longer be entitled to the tax benefits available to it under the pre-amendment regime of the Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments. A company will be allowed to continue and enjoy the tax benefits available under the law prior to its amendment until the end of the period of benefits, as defined in the law.

 

In December 2016, the Economic Efficiency Law (Legislative Amendments to Achieving the Budget Goals for 2017 and -2018), 2016 was published. Under this law, two new benefit programs for high-tech industries” benefited technology enterprise “and “special benefited technology enterprise ”enterprise” were added.


MEDIGUS LTD.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 11 - TAXES ON INCOME(continued):

 

b)2)Tax benefits

 

The Company has not decided at this stage whether and when to elect the application of the amendment of the law. Once the Company generates taxable income, it is currently scheduled to be eligible for tax benefits available under the Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments before it was amended in accordance with the provisions of the benefited enterprise regime, as follows:

F-30

MEDIGUS LTD.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 10 - TAXES ON INCOME(continued):

 

Reduced tax rates

 

During the period of benefits - 10 years commencing in the first year in which the Company earns taxable income from the benefited enterprises (provided the maximum period to which it is restricted by law has not elapsed) - the income from the benefited enterprises owned by the Company is tax exempt so long as it is not distributed or deemed to be distributed. The portion of income which qualifies for tax exemption as above is based on the ratio between the turnover relating to the “benefited enterprise” and the total turnover of the Company.

 

In the event of a dividend distribution or deemed dividend distribution from income which was previously exempt, the Company will be subject to tax on the grossed-up amount of the (deemed) dividend, according to the tax rate which would have applied to the income were it not eligible for the exemption.

 

The Company has not yet utilized the tax benefits for the main plant, nor for the expansion of the plant.

 

c)3)Conditions to receive the benefits

 

The entitlement to the above benefits is conditional upon the Company’s fulfillment of the conditions stipulated by the Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments, and the regulations promulgated thereunder. In the event of failure to comply with these conditions, the benefits may be cancelled, and the Company may be required to refund the amount of the benefits, in whole or in part, with the addition of interest. As of the date of approval of these financial statements, the Company has met the aforementioned conditions.

 

d.Carry forward tax losses

 

Carry forward tax losses of Medigus aggregate NIS 231270 million (approximately USD 78 million) and NIS 252 million (approximately USD 67 million) and NIS 204 million (approximately USD 59 million) as of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively. The Company did not record deferred taxes asset in respect of these losses, as the utilization thereof is not expected to occur in the foreseeable future.

 

e.Tax advances for certain employee benefits expenses

Tax advances for certain employee benefits expenses that are not deductible forCarry forward tax purposes paid to the tax authorities are charged to the Statementlosses of loss and other comprehensive loss on a current basis; the Company doesScoutCam Ltd. aggregate NIS 5 million (approximately USD 1.5 million) as of December 31, 2019. ScoutCam Ltd. did not record these advances as a taxdeferred taxes asset in its booksrespect of accounts,these losses, as the utilization thereof is not expected to occur in the foreseeable future.

 

The total said tax advances paid which have not yet been offset is approximately NIS 191 thousand (approximately – USD 50 thousand) and approximately NIS 174 thousand (approximately – USD 45 thousand) as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.F-48

F-31

 

MEDIGUS LTD.

 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

NOTE 1011 - TAXES ON INCOME(continued):

 

f.Tax assessments

The Company was subject to a withholding tax audit in Israel for the four years ended December 31, 2014. The Israeli Tax authorities completed their audit on October 6, 2016 and issued an assessment claiming additional NIS 5.3 million (approximately USD 1.5 million) withholding taxes for the period mentioned, mainly related to the Company's prior CEO’s compensation. It is the management’s opinion, based on legal opinion, that it’s more likely than not that the claim will be dismissed. Accordingly, no provision was recorded in these consolidated financial statements.

In accordance with Israeli tax regulations, as of December 31, 2017, the tax returns filed by the Company through the 2010 tax year are considered final. As of the date of the approval of these financial statements, tax years 2011-2012 are considered final and the related tax audit exposure decreased to USD 0.8 million.

g.e.Taxes on income included in the Statements of Loss and Other Comprehensive Loss for the periods presented:

 

The following is reconciliation between the “theoretical” tax, which would apply to the Group if all of its income were taxed at the regular rate applicable to the Company in Israel (see a2 above) and the amount of tax reflected in the Statements of Loss for the reported year:

 

  2017  2016  2015 
  USD in thousands 
Loss before taxes on income  (2,552)  (8,979)  (9,464)
Theoretical tax savings  (587)  (2,245)  (2,508)
Increase in taxes arising from mainly tax losses created in the reported year for which deferred taxes were not recorded  580   2,273   2,576 
Taxes on income (Tax benefit)  (7)  28   68 

  2019  2018  2017 
  USD in thousands 
Loss before taxes on income  (14,179)  (6,578)  (2,552)
Theoretical tax benefit  (3,261)  (1,513)  (587)
Disallowed deductions (tax exempt income):            
Gain on adjustment of warrants to fair value  (33)        
Share-based compensation  60         
Listing expenses  2,323         
Other  7         
Increase in taxes for tax losses and timing differences incurred in the reporting year for which deferred taxes were not created  903  1,533   580 
Actual taxes on income  (1)  20   (7)
F-32

MEDIGUS LTD.

 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

NOTE 1112 - ACCOUNTS PAYABLETRADE PAYABLES AND ACCRUALS:OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES:

 

a.Trade payables are denominated in the following currencies:

 

   December 31, 
   2017  2016 
   USD in thousands 
 NIS unlinked  123   108 
 USD  54   252 
 Euro  13   7 
    190   367 
  December 31, 
  2019  2018 
  USD in thousands 
NIS unlinked  75   137 
USD  -   43 
Euro  -   10 
   75   190 

 

b.Other:

 

   December 31, 
   2017  2016 
   USD in thousands 
 Payroll and related expenses  180   150 
 Wages and fees of related parties and related expenses  72   90 
 Institutions  96   132 
 Provision for vacations and recreation  158   170 
 Advanced payments from customers  61   193 
 Accrued expenses  200   232 
    767   967 
  December 31, 
  2019  2018 
  USD in thousands 
Institutions  73   - 
Accrued expenses  522   299 
Provisions  -   54 
Other  8   - 
   603   353 

 

Other payable balances (except for advances from customers) are denominated in the following currencies:

 

   As of December 31, 
   2017  2016 
   USD in thousands 
        
 NIS unlinked  461   469 
 USD  215   274 
 Euro  30   31 
    706   774 
  As of December 31, 
  2019  2018 
  USD in thousands 
       
NIS unlinked  63   48 
USD  461   280 
Euro  71   25 
   595   353 

 

The balances of the financial instruments included within the trade payables and other payables approximate their fair value as the effect of the discounting is immaterial.

F-33

 

MEDIGUS LTD.

 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

NOTE 1213 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES:EQUITY:

 

a.Commitments:

Lease agreements:

1)The Company has an operating lease agreement with respect to the building it use. The lease period ends in December 31, 2018.

The lease payments are linked to the Israeli CPI.

The annual lease payments amounted to approximately USD 124 thousands for the year ended December 31, 2017.

The minimum annual lease payments under the agreements for 2018 are USD 85 thousands.

2)The Company leases vehicles under operating lease agreements for a period of 36 months. With regards to these agreements, the Company has deposited amounts as security for the future lease payments. As of the balance sheet date the balance of such deposits is approximately USD 13 thousands which was recorded as part of the prepaid expenses within the Accounts receivables – other. The minimum annual lease payments according to the agreements are as follows:

   December 31,
2017
 
   USD in thousands 
 2018  49 
 2019  32 
 2020  10 
    91 

b.Contingent liabilities:

1)On June 16, 2015, the Company filed a claim in the District Court of Delaware against EndoChoice, Inc. (“EndoChoice”) for its patent infringement, seeking an injunctive order and damages. On October 6, 2015, the Company filed claims against EndoChoice’s trademark applications with the Israeli Patent Office. On December 29, 2015, EndoChoice filed a separate trademark and unfair competition action against the Company and its U.S. Subsidiary. In addition, on January 27, 2016, EndoChoice commenced an opposition procedure with the Israeli Patent Office against the Company’s trademark application in Israel.

On October 28, 2016, the Group and EndoChoice settled all litigation and administrative proceedings between themselves, including those actions pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware C.A. Nos. 15-505-LPS-CJB and C.A. No. 15-1215-LPS-CJB and the trademark opposition proceedings in the State of Israel involving Trademark Application Nos. 257172, 260433 and 262423. Under the settlement agreement, Medigus was granted a covenant not to sue with respect to EndoChoice FUSE-related trademarks and EndoChoice was granted a non-exclusive license to Medigus’ U.S. Patent No. 6,997,871 and related patents. Each party has agreed to bear its own costs and fees associated with the Litigations.

F-34

MEDIGUS LTD.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 12 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES(continued):

2)

On March 30, 2016, a former secretary and internal legal advisor (the “Employee”) filed a lawsuit against the Company and its chief executive officer. The lawsuit notes several claims, among which is that the Employee was wrongfully terminated. On July 19, 2017, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with the Employee in consideration for him dismissing his claims.

3)Refer to Note 10f regarding withholding tax audit.

NOTE 13 - EQUITY:

a.Share capital:

 

1)Composed as follows:

 

  Number of shares  Amount 
  Authorized  

Issued and

paid

  Authorized  Issued and paid 
  December 31,  December 31,  December 31,  December 31, 
  2017  2016  2017  2016  2017  2016  2017  2016 
  

In thousands

  NIS in thousands  USD in thousands 
Ordinary shares of  NIS 0.1 par value*  800,000   150,000   191,786   44,143   80,000   15,000   5,292   1,189 

* Traded on TASE at NIS 0.094 per ordinary share of NIS 0.1 par value on December 31, 2017. Traded on the NASDAQ at USD 1.32 per ADS on December 31, 2017.

  Number of shares  Amount 
  Authorized  Issued and paid  Authorized  Issued and paid 
  December 31,  December 31,  December 31,  December 31, 
  2019  2018  2019  2018  2019  2018  2019  2018 
  In thousands  NIS in thousands  USD in thousands 
Ordinary shares of NIS 1.00 par value  250,000   160,000   82,599   75,932   250,000   160,000   22,802   20,924 

 

2)The ordinary shares confer upon their holders voting rights and the right to participate in shareholders’ meetings, the right to receive dividends and the right to participate in surplus assets in the event of liquidation of the Company.

 

3)On March 20, 2017 aJanuary 9, 2019 an extraordinary general meeting  of the Company’s shareholders approved an increase of the authorized share capital of the Company by an additional NIS 65,000,0007,000,000, consisting of 7,000,000 ordinary shares par value NIS 1.00 per share, such that the authorized share capital of the Company following such increase shall be NIS 80,000,000,167,000,000, consisting of 800,000,000167,000,000 ordinary shares, NIS 0.1 par value per share.shares.

 

4)On July 25, 2019 the Company’s shareholders approved an increase of the authorized share capital of the Company by an additional NIS 83,000,000, such that the authorized share capital increased to NIS 250,000,000 ordinary shares par value NIS 1.00 each. 

 F-35

MEDIGUS LTD.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 13 – EQUITY(continued):

b.Share offering to the public and existing shareholders:

   

1)On July 8, 2015, the Company issued a shelf offering report in Israel in accordance with a shelf prospectus of the Company dated August 28, 2013.

In accordance with results of the offering to the public the Company issued 70,525 units at the price of NIS 380 per unit. Each unit was comprised of 100 ordinary shares and 500 warrants (Series 9).

Each 10 warrants (Series 9) is exercisable into 1 share in consideration for an exercise price of NIS 5.32 until July 8, 2018.

The immediate proceeds (gross) from the issuance of all securities offered amounted to approximately NIS 26.8 million.

Net proceeds from the issuance, net of issuance expenses, amounted to approximately USD 6.8 million (NIS 25.5 million) of which a total of USD 6 million were allocated to shares, and a total of USD 0.8 million to warrants (Series 9) in accordance to the fair value ratios of the instruments.

2)On September 12, 2016, the Company closed a registered direct offering, pursuant to which the Company issued a total of 128,000 ADS representing a total of 6,400,000 ordinary shares, at a purchase price of USD 11.5 per ADS.

The immediate gross and net of issuance proceeds from such securities issuance aggregated to approximately USD 1.47 million and USD 1.30 million, respectively.

The Company issued to the co-placement agent on this offering warrants (Series H) to purchase up to a total 3,955 ADSs representing 197,750 ordinary shares, with an exercise price of USD 14.375 per ADS during the 5 years following the allotment. The warrants may, under certain circumstances, also be exercised via a cashless exercise mechanism as defined in the agreement.

The fair value of such warrants as was calculated by the Company amounted to USD 38 thousand.

3)On October 17, 2016 warrants (Series 8) expired as the exercise period was ended.

4)On December 6, 2016, the Company closed a registered direct offering, pursuant to which the Company issued a total of a total of 113,917 ADSs representing a total of 5,695,850 ordinary shares, at a purchase price of USD 6.7 per ADS, and warrants (Series I) to purchase up to a total of 39,871 ADSs representing 1,993,550 ordinary shares.

The immediate gross and net of issuance expenses proceeds from such securities issuance aggregated to approximately USD 0.8 million and USD 0.6 million, respectively.

Each warrant (Series I) is exercisable into 1 ADS at an exercise price of USD 9 per ADS during the 5.5 years following the allotment.

As the warrants may be net share settled these warrants are classified as financial liabilities measured at fair value through profit or loss at each reporting period.

As to the fair value of the said warrants as of December 31, 2017 see note 4(2).

F-36

MEDIGUS LTD.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 13 – EQUITY(continued):

The Company issued to the placement agent on this offering warrants (Series J) to purchase up to a total 3,987 ADSs representing 199,355 ordinary shares, with an exercise price of USD 7.37 per ADS during the 5 years following the allotment. The warrants may, under certain circumstances, also be exercised via a cashless exercise mechanism.

As part of the December 2016 offering, the Company issued to Roth Capital Partners and Maxim Group LLC, which served as the transaction bankers, warrants (Series J) to purchase up to a total 1,993 ADSs representing 99,675 ordinary shares, with an exercise price of USD 9 per ADS during the 5.5 years following the allotment. The warrants may, under certain circumstances, also be exercised via a cashless exercise mechanism as defined in the agreement.

The fair value of such warrants as was calculated by the Company as of the date of grant amounted to USD 32 thousand.

5)On March 29, 2017, the Company allotted in a public issue, a total of 48,985,7004,898,570 ordinary shares of the Company, a total of 2,142,858 warrants (Series A)A for the purchase of an additional 107,142,900 shares andup to a total of 1,163,144 warrants (Series B) for the purchase of an additional 58,157,200535,730 ADSs representing 10,714,600 shares, for total cash consideration of approximately USD 7.5 million. Each warrant (Series A) is exercisable into 50 ordinary shares of the Company atwith an exercise price of USD 3.5014 per warrantADS during the five5 years following the allotment. Each warrant (Series B) is exercisable into 50 ordinaryallotment and warrants B for the purchase up to a total 290,786 ADSs representing 5,815,720 shares, of the Company atwith an exercise price of USD 0.010.05 per warrant.ADS.

 

Warrants (Series A)A and warrants (Series B)B may, under certain circumstances, also be exercised via a cashless exercise mechanism as defined in the agreement, whereby the number of shares the value of which equals the exercise premium in cash will be deducted from the number of shares to be issued upon exercise of the warrant. In addition, the number of warrants outstanding will be adjusted for certain events specified in the warrant agreement.

 

In addition, the Company issued to the placement agent on this offering 150,000 warrants (Series Placement). Each warrant is immediately exercisable into 50to purchase up to a total 37,501 ADSs representing 750,020 ordinary shares, in consideration forwith an exercise price of USD 4.37517.5 per warrantADS during the 5 years following the allotment. The warrants may, under certain circumstances, also be exercised via a cashless exercise mechanism as defined in the agreement. The fair value of such warrants as calculated by the Company as of the date of grant amounted to USD 221 thousand.


MEDIGUS LTD.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 13 - EQUITY(continued):

 

As the warrants may be net share settled these warrants, other than the warrants issued to the placement, are classified as financial liabilities measured at fair value through profit or loss at each reporting period. The warrants are initially recognized at fair value adjusted to defer the difference between the fair value at initial recognition and the transaction price (“Day 1 loss”), as the Company uses valuation techniques that incorporate data not obtained from observable markets. Transaction costs allocated to the warrants are recognized immediately in profit or loss. As to the fair value of the said warrants as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 see note 5.

 

Unrecognized Day 1 loss is amortized over the expected life of the instrument. Any unrecognized Day 1 loss is immediately recognized in income statement if fair value of the financial instrument in question can be determined either by using only market observable model inputs or by reference to a quoted price for the same product in an active market.

F-37

MEDIGUS LTD.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 13 – EQUITY(continued):

 

Upon exercise, the carrying amount of the warrants (which is presented net of the related unrecognized Day loss, if any) is reclassified to equity with no impact on profit or loss.

 

Net proceeds from the issuance, net of cash issuance expenses, aggregated to approximately USD 6.5 million. Issuance expenses were attributed to equity and liability in proportion with the allocation of the proceeds.

 

During 2017 all warrants (Series B)B were exercised. Accordingly, 58,157,2005,815,720 ordinary shares of the Company were allotted.

 

The warrants (Series A)Warrants A are presented as non-current liabilities, as cash settlement is not required.within current liabilities.

 

6)2)On November 28, 2017, the Company closed a registered direct offering, pursuant to which the Company issued a total of of 810,000202,500 ADSs representing a total of 40,500,0004,050,000 ordinary shares, at a purchase price of USD 28 per ADS, and warrants (Series L) to purchase up to a total of 405,000101,251 ADSs representing 20,250,0002,025,020 ordinary shares.shares, with an exercise price of USD 9 per ADS during the 5.5 years following the allotment

 

The immediate gross and net of issuance expenses proceeds from such securities issuance aggregated to approximately USD 1.6 million and USD 1.4 million, respectively.

Each warrant (Series L) is exercisable within six months following its issuance into 50 ordinary share of the Company at an exercise price of USD 2.25 per warrant during the five and a half years following the allotment.

 

As the warrants may be net share settled these warrants are classified as financial liabilities measured at fair value through profit or loss at each reporting period.

 

As to the fair value of the said warrants as of December 31, 20172019 and December 31, 2018 see note 4(2).5.

 

To the placement agent on this offering the Company issued warrants (Series M) to purchase up to an aggregate 56,70014,177 ADSs representing 2,835,000283,540 ordinary shares. Each warrant (Series M) is exercisable into 50 share in consideration forshares, with an exercise price of USD 2.5010 per warrantADS during the 5 years following the allotment. The warrants may, under certain circumstances, also be exercised via a cashless exercise mechanism as defined in the agreement. The fair value of such warrants as was calculated by the Company as of the date of grant amounted to USD 46 thousand.


 

MEDIGUS LTD.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 13 - EQUITY(continued):

 F-383)

On July 23, 2018, the Company completed a public offering with approximately USD 9.9.million gross proceeds, or USD 8.6 million net of issuance costs by issuing (a) 577,529 units at a price of USD 3.50 per unit, each unit consisting of (i) one ADS and (ii) one Warrant C to purchase one ADS for an exercise price of USD 3.50 per ADS for a period of five years (hereinafter - “Warrants C”), and (b) 2,260,145 pre-funded units at a price of USD 3.49 per unit, each unit consisting of (i) one pre-funded warrant to purchase one ADS for an exercise price of USD 0.01 per ADS with no time limitation, and (ii) one Warrant C.

As part of such public offering, the Company provided the underwriters an option exercisable within 30 days to purchase: (a) up to 425,651 additional ADSs for USD 3.50 per ADS and (b) up to 425,651 Warrants C for USD 0.01 per warrant. The underwriters exercised only the latter option.

The Company was also obligated to issue the underwriters 198,637 warrants to purchase 198,637 ADSs for an exercise price of USD 4.375 per ADS for a period of five years once the Company increases its authorized share capital. The fair value of such warrants as calculated by the Company as of the grant date amounted to USD 375 thousand.

During 2018 all pre-funded warrants were exercised. Accordingly, 45,202,900 ordinary shares of the Company were allotted.

Warrants C may, under certain circumstances, be exercised via a cashless exercise mechanism as defined in the warrant agreement. In addition, the number of warrants outstanding will be adjusted for certain events specified in the warrant agreement. As such warrants C are classified as financial liabilities measured at fair value through profit or loss at each reporting period.

Accordingly, warrants C were initially recognized at fair value. The difference between the fair value of warrants at initial recognition and the transaction price (“Day 1 Loss”) at the sum of $149 thousand was immediately recognized in the income statement.

The pre funded warrants are initially recognized at fair value adjusted to defer Day 1 Loss. Unrecognized Day 1 Loss was amortized on a straight line basis over of a period of approximately 30 days. Upon exercise, the carrying amount of the pre funded warrants (which is presented net of the related unrecognized Day 1 Loss, if any) is reclassified to equity. As a result, during the third quarter of 2018 the Company recognized Day 1 Loss related to the pre funded warrants in an amount of $441 thousand. Furthermore, during the third quarter of 2018, all pre funded warrants were exercised.

Issuance cost were attributed to equity and liability components in proportion with the allocation of the proceeds, amounting to USD 319 thousand and USD 1,565 thousand, respectively. Issuance cost attributed to the equity component were charged directly as a reduction to equity while those attributed to liability components were charged directly to profit or loss.

In the event of a fundamental transaction as defined in the warrant C agreement (other than a fundamental transaction not approved by the Company’s board of directors), the Company or any successor entity shall at the option of the holder of warrants C, exercisable at any time concurrently with, or within 30 days after, the consummation of the fundamental transaction, purchase such warrants from their holder by paying an amount of cash equal to the Black Scholes value of the remaining unexercised portion of the warrant Cs on the date of the consummation of such fundamental transaction. The Black Scholes value of the said warrants as of December 31, 2019, amounted to USD 2.3 million. As of December 31, 2018, the Company believes that no event that constitutes a fundamental transaction has occurred.

F-53

 

MEDIGUS LTD.

 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

NOTE 13 - EQUITY(continued):

 

4)As part of agreement with Algomizer (see Note 4), on September 3, 2019 Company issued to Algomizer 333,334 ADSs representing 6,666,680 ordinary shares and 333,334 warrants to purchase 333,334 ADSs representing 6,666,680 ordinary shares, with an exercise price of USD 4 per ADS during the 3 years following the allotment. As a result, the ordinary shares and warrants were recorded based on their fair value amounting to $630 thousand and $197 thousand, respectively.

5)In December 2019, ScoutCam Inc. allotted in a private issuance, a total of 3,413,312 units at a purchase price of USD $0.968 per unit. Each unit was comprised of two shares of common stock par value US$0.001 per share, one Warrant A and two Warrants B. The immediate proceeds (gross) from the issuance of the units amounted to approximately USD 3.3 million.5) See note 4.

c.Share based payments(not include warrants (Series H, Series J, Series Placement and Series M) as described above):

 

1)In August 2013, our board of directors approved and adopted our 2013 Share Option and Incentive Plan, or the 2013 Plan, which expires in August 2023. The 2013 Plan provides for the issuance of shares and the granting of options, restricted shares, restricted share units and other share-based awards to employees, directors, officers, consultants, advisors, and service providers of us and our U.S. Subsidiary. The Plan provides for awards to be issued at the determination of our board of directors in accordance with applicable law. 
2)The following are the grants of options to employees and other service providers:

 

Date of grant Plan Number of options granted  exercise price per option (NIS)  Fair value on grant date-NIS in thousands  Number of options outstanding- December 31, 2017  Number of options exercisable at 31, December 2017  Expiration date
April 2012 Series A  230,000   (**)0.91   117   100,000   100,000  April 23, 2018
April 2012 Series B  1,150,000   (**)0.68   659   680,000   680,000  April 23, 2018
October 2013 Series C  (***)4,500,000   (**)0.83   1,357   3,850,000   3,850,000  September 30, 2018
July 2014 Series D  (*)310,000   (**)0.537   56   60,000   45,000  July 17, 2020
July 2014 Series D  3,070,000   (**)0.537   554   1,580,000   1,185,000  July 17, 2020
December 2015 Series F  (*)157,500   2.05   116   157,500   78,750  December 29, 2021
December 2015 Series F  664,800   2.05   491   251,300   125,650  December 29, 2021
October 2017 Series K  (*)1,750,000   0.162   167   1,750,000      October 17, 2023
October 2017 Series K  9,880,000   0.162   942   9,880,000      October 17, 2023
Total    21,712,300           18,308,800   6,064,400   
Date of grant  Number of options granted  exercise
price per
option (NIS)
  Fair value
on grant date-NIS
in thousands
  Number of
options outstanding-
December 31,
2019
  Number of
options
exercisable at 31,
December 2019
  Expiration date
July 2014 (***)   3,070,000   (**)0.537  554   880,000   880,000  July 17, 2020
December 2015 (****)   664,800   2.05   491   170,800   170,800  December 29, 2021
October 2017 (****)   7,630,000   0.162   942   4,380,000   2,190,000  October 17, 2023
January 2019 (*****)   (*)3,000,000  0.59   947   2,562,500   1,250,000  January 9, 2025
July 2019 (*****)   (*)1,250,000  0.59   325   1,250,000   -  July 25, 2025
Total   15,614,800           9,243,300   4,490,800   

 

(*)Granted to related parties.
(**)Linked to the CPI as set out in the option allotment plan.
(***)The board of directors meeting dated August 12, 2013, and the general meeting of the Company’s shareholders dated September 29, 2013 authorized the allotment of 4,500,000Each 100 options (Series C), to the Group’s CEO. The options (Series C) are subject to the conditions of the option allotment plan, for the allotment of non-marketable options to officers, employees and advisors of the Group. exercisable into 1 ordinary share.
(****)Each 10 options are exercisable into 1 ordinary share.
(*****)Each 1 option is exercisable into one1 ordinary Company share of NIS 0.1 par value at the exercise price of NIS 8.3.share.

F-39

 

MEDIGUS LTD.

 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

NOTE 13 - EQUITY(continued):

 

The rightOn January 10, 2019, the Company entered into a separation agreement with former CEO. According to exercise options (Series C)the agreement all options granted to the former CEO arewill be deemed vested as follows:

(1)3,200,000 options will vest in 24 equal monthly batches, on the first day of each month, for a period of 24 months, commencing one year following the date employment started according to the agreement, i.e., commencing October 1, 2014.
(2)650,000 options will vest on June 30, 2014, provided that a target is met which was set by the Company’s board of directors and which is related to clinical activities of the MUSE system in the US through this date. These options were vested as of June 30, 2014.
(3)650,000 options will vest on February 1, 2015 provided that a sales revenues target is met in 2014, as set by the Company’s board of directors. In accordance with the decision of the Company’s board, these options expired on March 31, 2015 due to failure to meet the target.

Vesting conditions ofon February 28, 2019. On May 31, 2019 all of the above options except for the 1,300,000 options (Series C) as detailed in (2) and (3) above are service conditions.

Each 10 options (Series A, Series B, Series C and Series D) is exercisable into 1 ordinary share.

Each 1 option (Series F and Series K) is exercisable into 1 ordinary share.were expired.

 

The fair value of all of the options was calculated using the Black and Scholes options pricing model, and based on the following assumptions:

 

Date of grant Fair value on grant date-NIS in thousands  Share price on date of grant (NIS)  Expected dividend Expected volatility  Risk free interest  Vesting conditions Expected term Fair
value on
grant
date-NIS
in
thousands
  Share price on date of grant (NIS)  Expected dividend Expected volatility  Risk free interest  Vesting conditions Expected term
December 2015  607   1.627  None  54%  1.39% four equal batches, following one, two, three and four years from their grant date 6 years
October 2017  1,109   0.162  None  64%  1.16% four equal batches, following one, two, three and four years from their grant date 6 years  1,109   1.62  None  64%  1.16% four equal batches, following one, two, three and four years from their grant date 6 years
January 2019  947   0.506  None  74%  1.45% will vest in 12 equals quarterly instalments over a three-year period commencing October 1, 2018 6 years
July 2019  325   0.436  None  75%  1.12% 25% will vest on the first anniversary of the grant date and 75% will vest on a quarterly basis over a period of three years thereafter 6 years

  

 F-40

MEDIGUS LTD.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 13 - EQUITY(continued):

1)3)The changes in the number of share options and the weighted averages of their exercise prices are as follows:

 

 For the year ended December 31,  For the year ended December 31, 
 2017  2016  2015  2019  2018  2017 
 Number of options  Weighted average of exercise price per 1 ordinary share-(NIS)  Number of options  Weighted average of exercise price per 1 ordinary share-(NIS)  Number of options  Weighted average of exercise price per 1 ordinary share-(NIS)  Number of options  Weighted average of exercise price per 1 ordinary share-(NIS)  Number of options  Weighted average of exercise price per 1 ordinary share-(NIS)  Number of options  Weighted average of exercise price per 1 ordinary share-(NIS) 
Outstanding at the beginning of year  8,722,500   4.69   10,459,800   4.80   11,110,000   8.44   14,428,800   1.25   18,308,800   5.80   8,722,500   46.92 
Granted  11,630,000   0.162           1,172,300   2.05   1,250,000   0.59   3,000,000   0.59   11,630,000   1.62 
Forfeited  (801,064)  3.52   (302,500)  6.45   (485,833)  15.6   (5,151,000)  3.37       -   (801,064)  35.16 
Expired  (1,242,636)  3.74   (1,434,800)  5.09   (1,336,667)  6.98   (1,284,500)  0.88   (6,880,000)  15.16   (1,242,636)  37.44 
Outstanding at year end  18,308,800   0.58   8,722,500   4.69   10,459,800   4.80   9,243,300   0.88   14,428,800   1.25   18,308,800   5.80 
Exercisable at year end  6,064,400   6.11   7,208,542   6.32   6,034,999   9.23   4,490,800   1.28   4,541,600   3.83   6,064,400   61.09 

F-55

MEDIGUS LTD.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 13 - EQUITY(continued):

 

2)4)The amounts of expenses that were recorded for options to employees and other service providers in the reported years are USD 64259 thousand, USD 104157 thousand and USD 11664 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 2015,2017, respectively.

 

3)5)The plans are intended to be governed by the terms stipulated by Section 102 to the Israeli Income Tax Ordinance (except for the options to controlling shareholders and directors).

 

In accordance with these general rules and the track chosen by the Company pursuant to the terms thereof, in respect of options granted to employees under the option allotment plan, the Company is not allowed to claim as an expense for tax purposes the amounts credited to employees as a benefit, including amounts recorded as salary benefits in the Company’s books, with the exception of the salary-benefit component, if exists, determined on the grant date.

 

NOTE 14 - EXPENSES BY NATURE:

  

Year ended

December 31,

 
  2019  2018  2017 
  USD in thousands 
Payroll and related expenses  1,347   2,556   2,666 
Professional fees  1,945   2,313   1,609 
Materials used and subcontracted work  322   760   903 
Preparation of patents  249   139   118 
Rent and office maintenance  144   176   206 
Depreciation and amortization  75   42   77 
Vehicle maintenance  61   110   140 
Travel  47   223   189 
Advertising and participation in exhibitions  18   268   170 
Other  263   193   200 
Inventory impairment  -   328   297 
TOTAL COST OF REVENUES, INVENTORY IMPAIRMENT, RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, SELLING AND MARKETING AND GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES  4,471   7,108   6,575 

F-41

F-56

 

MEDIGUS LTD.

 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

NOTE 14 - EXPENSES BY NATURE:

  

Year ended

December 31,

 
  2017  2016  2015 
  USD in thousands 
Payroll and related expenses  2,666   4,104   4,575 
Professional fees  1,609   2,129   1,222 
Materials used and subcontracted work  903   1,566   2,120 
Travel  189   605   710 
Advertising and participation in exhibitions  170   403   648 
Rent and office maintenance  206   212   238 
Vehicle maintenance  140   202   177 
Preparation of patents  118   110   114 
Depreciation and amortization  77   99   122 
Other  200   210   257 
Inventory impairment  297         
TOTAL COST OF REVENUES, INVENTORY IMPAIRMENT, RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, SALES AND MARKETING AND GENERAL  AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES  6,575   9,640   10,183 

NOTE 15 - LOSS PER SHARE:

 

Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss attributable to ordinary shareholders of Medigus Ltd. byBy the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the reporting periods.

 

Diluted net loss per share is computed by dividing the basic net loss per share including adjustment of the dilutive effect of the Company’s revaluation of warrants, by the weighted-average number of ordinary shares and the potential dilutive ordinary shares outstanding during the period. Diluted shares outstanding include the dilutive effect of in-the-money options using the treasury stock method and presumed share settlement of the Company’s deferred payments liability.

 

F-42

MEDIGUS LTD.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 15 - LOSS PER SHARE(continued):

The following table presents the numerator and denominator of the basic and diluted net loss per share computations:

 

 

Year ended

December 31,

  

Year ended

December 31,

 
 2017  2016  2015  2019  2018  2017 
Numerator (USD in thousands):                   
Net loss attributable to Medigus Ltd. for basic loss per share  (2,545)  (9,007)  (9,532)
Net loss attributable to Medigus Ltd. For basic loss per share  (14,178)  (6,598)  (2,545)
Adjustment of revaluation of warrants issued to investors  (476)  -   -   -   -   (476)
Net loss attributable to Medigus Ltd. for diluted loss  (3,021)  (9,007)  (9,532)  (14,178)  (6,598)  (3,021)
                        
Denominator (in thousands):                        
Weighted average shares – denominator for basic net loss per share  125,685   34,397   28,415   78,124   41,988   12,569 
Shares settlement presumed for warrants issued to investors  4,005   -   -   -   -   400 
Denominator for diluted loss per share  129,690   34,397   28,415   78,124   41,988   12,969 
                        
Net loss per share attributable to Medigus Ltd. (USD)                        
Basic  (0.02)  (0.26)  (0.34)  (0.18)  (0.16)  (0.20)
Diluted  (0.02)  (0.26)  (0.34)  (0.18)  (0.16)  (0.23)

 

To compute diluted loss per share for the year ended December 31, 2019, the total number of 94,204,620 shares subject to outstanding options and warrants have not been taken into account since they have anti-dilutive effect.

F-43

F-57

 

MEDIGUS LTD.

 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

NOTE 16 -TRANSACTIONS- TRANSACTIONS AND BALANCES WITH RELATED PARTIES

 

“Related Parties” – As defined in IAS 24 – ‘Related Party Disclosures” (hereinafter- “IAS 24”)

 

Key management personnel of the Company - included together with other entities, in the said definition of “Related Parties” mentioned in IAS 24, include some members of senior management.

 

a.Transactions with related parties:
   
  1):

 

  

Year ended on
December 31,

 
  2017  2016  2015 
  USD in thousands 
Preparation of patents      18   114 
Benefits to related parties:            
Payroll and related expenses to related parties employed by the Company* (2017: 1 recipients, 2016 and 2015: 3 recipients)  478   377   716 
Compensation to directors not employed by the Company (2017: 3 recipients, 2016: 4 recipients, 2015: 3 recipients)  71   52   58 
Compensation to a director employed by the Company      14   13 
Directors’ and Officers’ insurance  71   61   48 
  Year ended on
December 31,
 
  2019  2018  2017 
  USD in thousands 
Benefits to related parties:         
Payroll and related expenses to related parties employed by the Company*
(2019: 2 recipients; 2018 and 2017: 1 recipients)
  389   621   478 
Compensation to directors (2019:5 recipients, 2018:8
recipients, 2017: 3 recipients) **
  326   131   71 
             
Directors’ and Officers’ insurance  158   91   71 
Consultant services (see 4g and 4e below)  404   -   - 

 

*Includes granted options benefit aggregated to USD 1161 thousand, USD 2024 thousand and USD 7111 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 2015,2017, respectively. As for the method used to determine the said value and the assumptions used in calculation thereof, see Note 13 C.13c.
**Includes granted options benefit aggregated to USD 126 thousand, USD 47 thousand and USD 11 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. As for the method used to determine the said value and the assumptions used in calculation thereof, see Note 13c.

F-44

MEDIGUS LTD.

 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

NOTE 16 -TRANSACTIONS- TRANSACTIONS AND BALANCES WITH RELATED PARTIES(continued):

 

2)Compensation to key management personnel

 

The compensation to key management personnel for employment services they provide to the Company is as follows:

 

   

Year ended on

December 31,

 
   2017  2016  2015 
   USD in thousands 
 For employment services:            
 Payroll and other short-term benefits  **467   330   *456 
 Share based payments  11   19   62 
    478   349   518 

*Including provision for bonus of approximately USD 86 thousand.

**Including provision for bonus of approximately USD 56 thousand.

  

Year ended on

December 31,

 
  2019  2018  2017 
  USD in thousands 
For employment services:         
Payroll and other short-term benefits  *328  **597  ***467
Share based payments  61   24   11 
   389   621   478 

 

*Including provision for bonus of approximately USD 46 thousand.

**Including provision for bonus of approximately USD 88 thousand and provision for termination of employment of approximately USD 158 thousand.

***Including provision for bonus of approximately USD 56 thousand.

3)Indemnification, exemption and insurance for directors and officers of the Company

 

a.The Company provides its directors and officers with an obligation for indemnification and exemption.

 

b.The Company has a directors and officers’ liability insurance policy covering all Company’s directors and officers. WeThe Company currently havehas directors’ and officers’ liability insurance providing total coverage of $12$8 million for the benefit of all of our directors and officers, in respect of which we arethe Company is charged a twelve-month premium of $80$410 thousand, and which includes a deductible of up to $50,000$250,000 per claim, other than securities related claims filed in the U.S. or Canada, for which the deductible shall not exceed $350,000.$1,500,000. The policy should be approved by the Company’s shareholders.

 

b.Balances with related parties:

   December 31, 
   2017  2016 
   USD in thousands 
 Current liabilities, presented in the balance sheets among “accounts payable and accruals”:      
 Directors fee  16   4 
 Provision for bonus  56   86 
    72   90 

c.As to options granted to related parties, see Note 13 C.

F-45

F-59

 

MEDIGUS LTD.

 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

NOTE 17 – ENTITY LEVEL DISCLOSURES:16 - TRANSACTIONS AND BALANCES WITH RELATED PARTIES(continued):

4) Transactions

 

a.On May 30, 2019, ScoutCam Ltd. entered into an intercompany agreement with Medigus (the “Intercompany Agreement”) according to which ScoutCam Ltd. agreed to hire and retain certain services from Medigus. The agreed upon services provided under the Intercompany Agreement included: (1) lease of office space and clean room based on actual space utilized by ScoutCam Ltd. and in shared spaces according to employee ratio; (2) utilities such as electricity water, IT and communication services based on employee ratio; (3) car services, including car rental, gas usage, payment for toll roads based on 100% of expense incurred from a ScoutCam Ltd. employee car; (4) external accountant services at a price of USD 6,000 per annum; (5) directors and officers insurance at a sum of 1/3 of Parent company cost; (6) CFO services at a sum of 50% of Parent company CFO employer cost; (7) every direct expense of ScoutCam Ltd. that is paid by the Parent company in its entirety subject to approval of such direct expenses in advance; and (8) any other mutual expense that is borne by the parties according to the Respective portion of the Mutual Expense.

In addition, ScoutCam Ltd.’s employees provide support services to Medigus.

b.On June 3, 2019, the Company executed a capital contribution on account of additional paid in capital into ScoutCam Ltd. of an aggregate amount of USD 720 thousand.
c.On August 27, 2019, the Company provided ScoutCam Ltd. with a line of credit in the aggregate amount of USD 500 thousand and, in exchange, ScoutCam Ltd. agreed to grant the Company a capital note that will bear an annual interest rate of 4%. The repayment of the credit line amount shall be spread over one year in monthly payments beginning January 2020.
d.On July 31, 2019, ScoutCam Ltd. and Prof. Benad Goldwasser entered into a consulting agreement, whereby Prof. Goldwasser agreed to serve as chairman of the board of directors of ScoutCam Ltd., effective retroactively to March 1, 2019, in consideration for, inter alia, a monthly fee of $10,000 and options representing 5% of our fully-diluted share capital as of the Closing Date (see note 16(a)(4)(f)).

F-60

MEDIGUS LTD.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 16 - TRANSACTIONS AND BALANCES WITH RELATED PARTIES(continued):

e.During December 2019, ScoutCam entered into a consulting agreement with Shrem Zilberman Group Ltd. (the “Consultant”) in the amount of USD 165 thousand. A director of ScoutCam is related to one of the Consultant’s shareholders.
In addition, the Consultant will be entitled to receive the amount representing 3% of any exercise price of each Warrant A or Warrant B that may be exercised in the future (see note 4). In the event the total proceeds received as a result of exercise of Warrants will be less than $2 million at the time of their expiration, the Consultant will be required to invest $250,000 in ScoutCam Inc.
f.On February 12, 2020, ScoutCam’s Inc. Board of Directors authorized the allotment of options to purchase 2,235,691 shares of Common Stock to Professor Benad Goldwasser, ScoutCam’s Inc. Chairman of the Board, and options to purchase 1,865,346 shares of Common Stock to certain officers of ScoutCam Inc. Each option is convertible into one share of common stock of ScoutCam Inc. of $0.001 par value at an exercise price of $0.29. See note 19c.
g.On May 1, 2019, we entered into a consulting agreement with L.I.A Pure Capital Ltd. or Pure Capital, a company owned by Kfir Zilberman for the provision of business development and strategic consulting services, including ongoing consulting to the company, its management and its chief executive officer in the fields of M&A and investment activities. In consideration for its services, Pure Capital is entitled to a monthly fee of NIS 40,000 (approximately $11,500), a finder’s fee of 5% of any investment of equity or debt introduced by him to the company and reimbursement of expenses of up to $1,000 per month. As part of Algomizer investment Pure capital received a finder fee in the amount of USD 125 thousand.

b.Balances with related parties:

  December 31, 
  2019  2018 
  USD in thousands 
Current liabilities, presented in the balance sheets among “accrued compensation expenses”:      
Directors fee  36   25 
Consultant services  204   - 
Payroll, provision for bonus and for termination of employment  52   246 
   292   271 

c.As to options granted to related parties, see Note 13c.

MEDIGUS LTD.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 17 - REVENUES:

a.Disaggregation of Revenues:

The following table present the Group’s revenues disaggregated by revenue type for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017:

  

Year ended on

December 31,

 
  2019  2018  2017 
  USD in thousands 
          
Miniature camera and related equipment  188   175   306 
Development services  85   217   - 
MUSE and related equipment  -   44   161 
   273   436   467 

Revenues from products are recognized at a point of time and revenues from services are recognized over time.

b.Contract liabilities:

The Company’s contract liabilities as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 were as follows:

  December 31, 
  2019  2018 
  USD in thousands 
The change in deferred revenues:      
Balance at beginning of year  349   179 
Deferred revenue relating to new sales  2,069   200 
Revenue recognition during the period  (116)  (30)
Balance at end of year  2,302   349 

MEDIGUS LTD.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 17 - REVENUES(continued):

Composition of contract liabilities:

  December 31, 
  2019  2018 
  USD in thousands 
       
Current contract liabilities  502   231 
Non-current contract liabilities  (*)1,800  118 
   2,302   349 

(*) On June 3, 2019, the Company entered into a Licensing and Sale Agreement with Shanghai Golden Grand-Medical Instruments Ltd. (hereinafter “Golden Grand”) for the know-how licensing and sale of goods relating to MUSE system in China, Hong Kong, Taiwan and Macao. Under the agreement, the Company committed to provide a license, training services and goods to Golden Grand in consideration for USD 3 million to be paid to the Company in four milestones based installments. The final milestone and the final installment shall be completed and paid upon the completion of a MUSE assembly line in China. The payment of a substantial amount of the consideration is contingent on achievement of certain milestones such as establishing a MUSE assembly line in China. In the event that Company is not able to meet such milestones, due to various factors including natural disasters, public health crises, political crises and trade wars which are not under Company control, Company entitlement to the aggregate consideration under the agreement may be impaired.

Remaining Performance Obligations

Remaining Performance Obligations (“RPO”) represents contracted revenue that has not yet been recognized, which includes deferred revenue and amounts that will be invoiced and recognized as revenue in future periods. As of December 31, 2019, the total RPO amounted to $3,906 thousand. The Company expects to recognize $906 thousand of this RPO during the next 12 months and $3,000 thousand more than 12 months after the end of the reporting period (out of which the receipt of the remaining consideration amounting to $1,200 thousand is subject to meeting future milestones pursuant to the Licensing and Sale Agreement with Golden Grand as described above).


MEDIGUS LTD.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 18 - ENTITY LEVEL DISCLOSURES:

a.Revenues by product:

 

   

Year ended on

December 31,

 
   2017  2016  2015 
   USD in thousands 
           
 Miniature camera and related equipment  306   449   558 
 MUSE and related equipment  161   100   66 
    467   549   624 
  

Year ended on

December 31,

 
  2019  2018  2017 
  USD in thousands 
Miniature camera and related equipment  188   175   306 
Development services  85   217   - 
MUSE and related equipment  -   44   161 
   273   436   467 

 

b.Revenues by geographical area (based on the location of customers):

 

   

Year ended on

December 31,

 
   2017  2016  2015 
   USD in thousands 
 USA  115   345   446 
 Switzerland  74         
 South Korea  52         
 Italy  49   3   39 
 Israel  22   119     
 Other  155   82   139 
    467   549   624 
  

Year ended on

December 31,

 
  2019  2018  2017 
  USD in thousands 
USA  138   315   115 
United Kingdom  36   24   14 
Germany  28   44   12 
Switzerland  -   3   74 
South Korea  -   7   52 
Italy  -   9   49 
Israel  31   12   22 
Other  40   22   129 
   273   436   467 

 

c.All of the Group’s long-lived assets are located in Israel.

 

d.Major customers

 

Set forth below is a breakdown of Company’s revenue by major customers (major customer –revenues from these customers constitute at least 10% of total revenues in a certain year):

 

  

Year ended on

December 31,

 
  2019  2018  2017 
  USD in thousands 
Customer A  85   134     
             
Customer B  30   92     
             
Customer C  40   21   14 
             
Customer D  27         
             
Customer E      9   49 

MEDIGUS LTD.

   

Year ended on

December 31,

 
   2017  2016  2015 
   USD in thousands 
 Customer A  49         
              
 Customer B      239   261 
              
 Customer C  9   118     

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 19 - EVENT SUBSEQUENT TO DECEMBER 31, 2019:

Effect of coronavirus

In December 2019, a strain of coronavirus was reported to have surfaced in Wuhan, China, and in 2020 has reached most countries, resulting in government-imposed quarantines, travel restrictions and other public health safety measures in China, the USA, Israel, and other affected countries. The various precautionary measures taken by many governmental authorities around the world in order to limit the spread of the Coronavirus, which has affected and could have an adverse effect on the global markets and its economy, including the demand for consumables, products and services, as well as on the availability and pricing of employees, resources, materials, manufacturing and delivery efforts and other aspects of the global economy.

Also, organizations of all sizes and types have closed their offices, instructing employees to remain at home and work remotely. Many organizations are not equipped to provide their entire work force with remote access to corporate resources, for both on premise and cloud environments. Some organizations do not have remote access technologies, while others have solutions that were built for the organization’s remote workers and travelers, but not for the entire work force.

At this point, the extent to which the coronavirus may impact our results is uncertain

The global effects of the coronavirus are difficult to assess or predict with meaningful precision since actual effects will depend on many factors beyond our control and knowledge at this stage, however, it may have an impact on our growth rate in the second quarter of 2020, or later.

Medigus

a.On January 13, 2020, together with Company’s advisor Mr. Kfir Zilberman (a related party as described at note 16), the Company established a subsidiary in Delaware, in which the Company holds 90% of the share capital, under the name GERD IP, Inc., or GERD IP. In connection thereto, the Company entered into a founders agreement as of January 12, 2020, with Kfir Zilberman. The founders agreement subjects the transfer of GERD IP membership interests held by Kfir Zilberman to a right of first offer, and provides that owners of 51% of GERD IP membership interest may enforce a sale of GERD IP on the minority membership interest. The Company is obligated under the founders agreement to indemnify Kfir Zilberman for litigations expenses imposed on him or incurred by him in connection with his capacity as owner of a membership interest in GERD IP.

b.On February 18, 2020 the Company purchased 2,284,865 ordinary shares of Matomy, representing 2.32% of the issued and outstanding share capital of Matomy for a total consideration of approximately $ 153 thousands. On March 24, 2020 the Company purchased additional 22,326,246 ordinary shares of Matomy, representing 22.67% of the issued and outstanding share capital of Matomy for a total consideration of US$ 1,464 thousands.

c.On April 19, 2020, the Company entered an Asset Transfer Agreement, effective January 20, 2020 with Company's majority owned subsidiary GERD IP, Inc. Pursuant to the Asset Transfer Agreement, the Company transferred certain of its patents in consideration for seven (7) capital notes issued to the Company by GERD IP, Inc., of $2,000,000 each.

ScoutCam Inc.

a.On March 3, 2020, ScoutCam allotted in a private issuance a total of 979,754 units at a purchase price of USD $0.968 per unit.

Each unit was comprised of two shares of common stock par value US$0.001 per share, one Warrant A (defined below) and two Warrants B (defined below).

Each Warrant A is exercisable into one share of common stock of ScoutCam’s at an exercise price of USD 0.595 per share during the 12 month period following the allotment.

Each Warrant B is exercisable into one share of common stock of ScoutCam’s at an exercise price of USD 0.893 per share during the 18 month period following the allotment.

F-65

MEDIGUS LTD.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 19 - EVENT SUBSEQUENT TO DECEMBER 31, 2019(continued):

The immediate proceeds (gross) from the issuance of all securities offered amounted to approximately USD 948 thousands.

No shares were allocated to the Company, therefore the Company’s holding of ScoutCam decreased from 60% to 55.9%

b.On February 2020, ScoutCam’s Board of Directors approved the 2020 Share Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). The Plan initially included a pool of 5,228,007 shares of common stock for grant to ScoutCam’s employees, consultants, directors and other service providers.

The Plan is designed to enable to grant options to purchase ordinary shares and RSUs under various and different tax regimes including, without limitation: (i) pursuant and subject to Section 102 of the Israeli Tax Ordinance or any provision which may amend or replace it and any regulations, rules, orders or procedures promulgated thereunder and to designate them as either grants made through a trustee or not through a trustee; and (ii) pursuant and subject to Section 3(i) of the Israeli Tax Ordinance.

On March 19, 2020 ScoutCam granted 4,367,515 options pursuant to the Plan. Each option is convertible into one share of common stock of ScoutCam of $0.001 par value at the exercise price of $0.29.

c.On March 15, 2020, ScoutCam’s  Board of Directors approved, among other things: (i) an increase option pool pursuant to the Plan by an additional 576,888 shares of Common Stock for future grants to employees, consultants, directors and other service providers of  ScoutCam; (ii) a quarterly fee of $4,000 payable to each director, excluding Professor Benad Goldwasser; and (iii) the allotment of options to purchase 576,888 shares of Common Stock of ScoutCam to each of ScoutCam’s directors, excluding Professor Benad Goldwasser. Each option granted to the ScoutCam’s directors is convertible into one share of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.29.

 

F-46

F-66

 

ITEM 19.EXHIBITS

 

Exhibit
Number
 Exhibit Description
1.1 Articles of Association of Medigus Ltd., as amended(1)
2.1 Form of Deposit Agreement between Medigus Ltd., The Bank of New York Mellon as Depositary, and owners and holders from time to time of ADSs issued thereunder, including the Form of American Depositary Shares(2)
2.2 Form of Series A Warrant to purchase Ordinary Shares Represented by American Depositary Shares issued in connection with the March 2017 Securities Purchase Agreements(3)
2.3 Form of Placement Agent Warrant to purchase Ordinary Shares Represented by American Depositary Shares issued in connection with the March 2017 Securities Purchase Agreements(3)
2.4Form of Series C Warrant Agent Agreement between the Registrant and Computershare Inc., as warrant agent, including Form of Series C Warrant(6)
2.5Description of Securities(1)
4.1 2013 Share Option and Incentive Plan(2)
4.2Series A Option Plan(2)∞
4.3Series B Option Plan(2)∞
4.4 Compensation Policy of Medigus Ltd.(4)(1)
4.74.3 Summary of LeaseAmended and Restated Inter Company Services Agreement by and between Medigus Ltd. and Tefen YazamutScoutCam Ltd. regarding main offices in Omer Industrial Park dated January 6, 2004, as amendedApril 20, 2020(1)
4.84.4 Form of Indemnification and Exculpation Undertaking(2)
4.94.5 Securities Purchase Agreement by and between the Registrant and the purchasers named therein, dated September 8, 2016(5)
4.10Securities Purchase Agreement by and between the Registrant and the purchasers named therein, dated November 30, 2016(6)
4.11Form of Warrant to purchase Ordinary Shares Represented by American Depositary Shares issued in connectionn with the November 30, 2016 Securities Purchase Agreements(6)(4)
4.124.6 Securities Purchase Agreement by and between the Registrant and the purchasers named therein, dated March 24, 2017(3)
4.13Securities Purchase Agreement by and between the Registrant and the purchasers in the registered direct offering dated November 24, 2017(7)
4.14Form of Warrant to purchase Ordinary Shares Represented by American Depositary Shares issued in connection with the November 24, 2017, Securities Purchase Agreements(7)(5)
8.1 List of Subsidiaries(2)(1)
10.1Asset Transfer Agreement by and between the Registrant and GERD, IP, Inc. dated April 19, 2020(1)*
10.2Founders Agreement by and between Medigus Ltd. and Kfir Zilberman dated January 12, 2020(1)
10.3Amended and Restated Asset Transfer Agreement by and between the Registrant and ScoutCam Ltd. dated December 1, 2019(1)*
10.4Patent License Agreement by and between the Registrant and ScoutCam Ltd. dated December 1, 2019(1)*
10.5Securities Purchase Agreement by and between the Registrant, Algomizer Ltd. and Linkury Ltd. dated June 19, 2019(1)*
10.6Know-How License and Sale of Goods Agreement By and between the Registrant and Shanghai MUSE Medical Science and Technology Co., Ltd. dated June 2, 2019(1)*
10.7Amended and Restated Consulting Agreement by and between Medigus Ltd. and L.I.A Pure Capital Ltd. dated May 1, 2019(1)
12.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer as required by rule 13a-14(a)(1)
12.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer as required by rule 13a-14(a)(1)
13.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer as required by rule 13a-14(a) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code(1)
13.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer as required by rule 13a-14(a) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code(1)
15.1 Consent of Kesselman & Kesselman, Certified Public Accountant (Isr.), a member of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited, independent registered public accounting firm for the Medigus Ltd.(1)
15.2Consent of Brightman Almagor Zohar & Co., Certified Public Accountant (Isr.), a firm in the Deloitte Global Netwrok, independent registered public accounting firm for Algomizer Ltd.(1)
101 Financial information from Medigus Ltd.’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 20172019 formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language)

 

(1)Furnished herewith.


(2)Previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 7, 2015,as an exhibit to the Registrant’s registration statementon Form 20-F (File No 001-37381) and incorporated by reference herein.

(3)Previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 23, 2017, as an exhibit to the Registrant’s registration statement on Form F-1 (File 333-216155) and incorporated by reference herein.

(4)Previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30, 2016, as an exhibit to the Registrant’s annual report on Form 20-F (File No 001-37381) and incorporated by reference herein.
(5)Previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 8, 2016, as an exhibit to the Registrant’s report on Form 6-K (File No 001-37381) and incorporated by reference herein.
(6)(4)Previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 1, 2016, as an exhibit to the Registrant’s report on Form 6-K (File No 001-37381) and incorporated by reference herein.

(7)(5)Previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 24, 2017, as an exhibit to the Registrant’s report on Form 6-K (File No 001-37381) and incorporated by reference herein.

(6)Previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 18, 2018, as an exhibit to the Registrant’s registration statement on Form F-1 (File 333-2225610) and incorporated by reference herein.

English translation of original Hebrew document.

 

117*Certain confidential information contained in this exhibit, marked by brackets, was omitted because it is both (i) not material and (ii) would likely cause competitive harm to the Company if publicly disclosed. “[***]” indicates where the information has been omitted from this exhibit.

SIGNATURESSIGNATURE

 

The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this registration statement on its behalf.

 

 Medigus Ltd.
   
Date: March 22, 2018April 21, 2020By:/s/ Christopher (Chris) RowlandLiron Carmel
  Christopher (Chris) RowlandLiron Carmel
  Chief Executive Officer
   
 By:/s/ Oded YatzkanTatiana Yosef
  Oded YatzkanTatiana Yosef
  Chief Financial Officer

 

117

118