SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549


FORM 20-F
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004
Commission file number: 1-15256

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
________________________

FORM 20-F

________________________

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2005
Commission file number: 1-15256

________________________

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

(F/K/A TELECOMUNICAÇÕES DO PARANÁ S.A. - TELEPAR)
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)


________________________
Brazil Telecom Company
(Translation of Registrant’s Name into English)
The Federative Republic of Brazil
(Translation of Registrant's Name into English)(Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)


_________________

SIA/Sul, ASP, Lote D, Bloco B -

71215-000 - Setor de Indústria, Brasília, DF, Brazil


(Address of Principal Executive Offices)



_________________
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:


Title of each classEach Class Name of each exchange on which registeredEach Exchange On Which Registered 
Preferred Shares, without par value, represented by
American Depositary Shares*
New York Stock Exchange

* American Depositary Shares issuable upon deposit of Preferred Shares were registered under a separate registration statement on Form F-6Shares* 
____________________

* American Depositary Shares issuable upon deposit of Preferred Shares were registered under a separate registration statement on Form F-6.

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act: None

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer's classes of capital or common stock as of
the close of the period covered by this Annual ReportReport::

At December 31, 20042005 there were outstanding:

249,597,049,542 Common Shares, without par value
292,011,413,079305,701,231,289 Preferred Shares, without par value

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the
Securities Act.

Yes    No  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.



Yes  No  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.
See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large Accelerated Filer  NoAccelerated Filer 
Non-Accelerated Filer  

Indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrantRegistrant has elected to follow:
follow.

Item 17     Item 18  



TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page
PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION34
FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS ANNUAL REPORT4
PART I65
PART I 
ITEM 3.Key Information67
Selected Financial InformationSelected Financial Data68
Exchange Rates911
Risk Factors1012
ITEM 4.Information on the Company2128
History and Development of the Company21
Capital Expenditures28
Capital Expenditures36
Business Overview2937
Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry5670
Property, Plant and Equipment6377
Environmental and Other Regulatory Matters6477
ITEM 5.Operating and Financial Review and Prospects6478
Overview of Results of Operations6478
U.S.US GAAP Reconciliation7083
Critical Accounting Policies7084
New Accounting Pronouncements7387
Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 200420057488
Liquidity and Capital Resources88102
ITEM 6.Directors, Senior Management and Employees95109
Board of Directors and Senior Management95109
Board Practices98112
Corporate Governance Practices100115
Employees100115
Performance Bonus Plan116
Share Ownership101116
ITEM 7.Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions102117
Major Shareholders102117
Related Party Transactions106122
ITEM 8.Financial Information106125
Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information106125
Legal Proceedings107125
Dividend Policy115133

2


ITEM 9.The Offer and Listing118

- i -


TABLE OF CONTENTS
(continued)

135Page
Offer and Listing Details118135
Markets121138
ITEM 10.Additional Information123140
Memorandum and Articles of Association123140
Material Contracts123140
Exchange Controls127143
Taxation128145
Independent Auditors134152
Documents on Display134152
ITEM 11.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk134153
Quantitative Information About Market Risk134153
PART II137
PART II
ITEM 14.Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds137156
ITEM 15.Controls and Procedures137156
ITEM 16A.Audit Committee Financial Expert137156
ITEM 16B.Code of Ethics137156
ITEM 16C.Principal Accountant Fees and Services137156
ITEM 16D.Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees157
ITEM 16E.Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers139158
PART III140
PART III
ITEM 17.Financial Statements140159
ITEM 18.Financial Statements140159
ITEM 19.Exhibits140159
Omitted items of Form 20-F are either not required in a Form 20-F filed as an annual report, not applicable or reserved.
INDEX OF DEFINED TERMS142161
TECHNICAL GLOSSARY143163
SIGNATURES146
EXHIBIT 8.1 SUBSIDIARIES OF BRASIL TELECOM S.A.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 
INDEX TO EXHIBITS147


- i i-3


Table of Contents

PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION

     In this Annual Report, Brasil Telecom S.A., a corporation organized under the laws of the Federative Republic of Brazil and its subsidiaries are referred to collectively as "Brasil Telecom," "our company," "we," "us" or the "Registrant." References to our company's businesses and operations are references to the businesses and operations of our company on a consolidated basis for the years 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2004.2005.

     References to (i) the "real," "reais" or "R$" are to Brazilianreais (plural) and the Brazilianreal (singular) and (ii) "U.S. dollars," "dollars" or "U.S.$"US$" are to United States dollars. All amounts in Brazilian currencies that existed prior to the adoption of thereal as the Brazilian currency on July 1, 1994 have been restated inreais. On May 31, 2005,2006, the Commercial Market selling rate (as defined in Item 3 "Key Information—Selected Financial Data—Exchange Rates") was R$2.40382.3005 to U.S.$US$1.00 as published by the Brazilian Central Bank. The exchange rate information in this Annual Report should not be construed as a representation that any such amounts have been, would have been or could be converted at this or any other exchange rate.

     Our audited consolidated financial statements were prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in Brazil ("Brazilian GAAP") which are similar to the Brazilian Corporation Law (Law 6.404/76, as amended by Law 10.303/01), except for the effects of the recognition of inflationary effects from January 1, 1996 to December 31, 2000, and are consistent with the rules and regulations of the Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commission (CVM —Comissão de Valores Mobiliários), and the accounting standards issued by the Brazilian Institute of Independent Auditors (Instituto dos Auditores Independentes do Brasil or "IBRACON"). Investors should note that financial statements prepared in accordance with Brazilian GAAP differ from financial statements prepared in accordance with Brazilian Corporation Law in the methodology used for the recognition of inflation, among other things. See Notes 2a and 2b to our audited consolidated financial statements for (i) a summary of the principal differences between Brazilian GAAP and Brazilian Corporation Law as they relate to us and (ii) a reconciliation from Brazilian Corporation Law to Brazilian GAAP of shareholders' equity as of December 31, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 20042005 and net income (loss) for each of the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2004.2005. Brazilian GAAP when applied to us differs in certain important respects from generally accepted accounting principles in the United States ("U.S.US GAAP"). See Note 33 to our audited consolidated financial statements for (i) a summary of the principal differences between Brazilian GAAP and U.S.US GAAP as they relate to us and (ii) a reconciliation to U.S.US GAAP of shareholders' equity as of December 31, 20032004 and 20042005 and net income (loss) for each of the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2004.2005. These audited consolidated financial statements are referred to herein as the "Financial Statements."

     Our audited annual consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2002, December 31, 2003, 2004 and December 31, 2004,2005, and for each of the twothree years in the period ended December 31, 2003, 2004 and December 31, 20042005 prepared in accordance with Brazilian GAAP with reconciliation of shareholders' equity and income statements to U.S.US GAAP, included in this Annual Report, have been audited by KPMG Auditores Independentes, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board as stated in their report appearing in this Annual Report.

     The "Index of Defined Terms" that begins on page 142161 lists the page where each defined term is defined within this document. Technical terms are defined in the Technical Glossary on page 143.163.

     Certain figures included in this Annual Report have been subject to rounding adjustments. Accordingly, figures shown as totals in certain tables may not be an arithmetic aggregation of the figures that precede them.

34


Table of Contents

FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS ANNUAL REPORT

     This Annual Report contains forward-looking statements. We may also make forward-looking statements in press releases and oral statements. Forward-looking statements are not statements of historical fact and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties. The words "anticipates," "believes," "estimates," "expects," "forecasts," "intends," "plans," "predicts," "projects," "targets" and similar words are intended to identify these forward-looking statements.

     In this Annual Report, we have made forward-looking statements with respect to, but not limited to:

     Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance. They involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions because they relate to future events and therefore depend on circumstances that may or may not occur in the future. Our future results and shareholder values may differ materially from those expressed in or suggested by these forward-looking statements. Many of the factors that will determine these results and values are beyond our ability to control or predict.

     Because these forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, there are important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. These factors include:

45


Table of Contents

     The reader should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we do not undertake any obligation to update them in light of new information or future developments. Neither our independent auditors, nor any other independent accountants, have compiled, examined, or performed any procedures, with respect to the prospective financial information contained herein, nor have they expressed any opinion or any other form of assurance on such information or its achievability, and assume no responsibility for, and disclaim any association with the prospective financial information.

     Information included in this Annual Report concerning Brazil, Telecom Italia International N.V. ("TII"), Techold Participações S.A. ("Techold") and Timepart Participações Ltda. ("Timepart") and other direct and indirect shareholders has been included herein based on public filings or other sources we assume to be correct but we have not independently verified such information.

56


Table of Contents

PART I

ITEM 3. Key InformationKEY INFORMATION

Selected Financial Data

Background

     The selected financial information presented herein should be read in conjunction with our Financial Statements and notes, which appear elsewhere in this Annual Report. Our selected financial information is presented on a combined consolidated basis for the year 2000 and on a consolidated basis for theall years 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004.presented.

     The following paragraphs discuss some important features of the presentation of the selected financial information and our Financial Statements. These features should be considered when evaluating the selected financial information.information and our Financial Statements and Notes.

Brazilian GAAP and U.S.US GAAP

     Our Financial Statements areThe consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Brazilian GAAP, which differ in certain significant respects from U.S.US GAAP.

     See Note 33 to our Financial Statements for (i) a summary of the principal differences between Brazilian GAAP and U.S.US GAAP as they relate to us, and (ii) a reconciliation to U.S.US GAAP of shareholders' equity as of December 31, 20032004 and 20042005 and net income (loss) for each of the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2004.

Effects of Inflation

     Unless otherwise specified, all financial information included in this Annual Report for the year 2000, recognizes certain effects of inflation and is restated in constantreais of December 31, 2000, all in accordance with Brazilian GAAP. We used the General Market Price Index,Índice Geral de Preços de Mercado ("IGP-M"), published byFundação Getúlio Vargas for purposes of such restatement. However, pursuant to Brazilian GAAP, our audited financial statements as of and for the years commencing after December 31, 2000, no longer recognize the effects of inflation and are not restated in constantreais.2005.

Change in Accounting Methodology

Depreciation

     See Item 4 "Information     For a discussion of recent changes in accounting methodology regarding depreciation, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—Property, plantPlant and equipment"Equipment" and Item 5 "Operating“Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Operating Results—Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2004—2005—Cost of Services—Depreciation and Amortization."

Difference from Financial Statements Published in Brazil

     Our statutory financial statements prepared in accordance with the Brazilian Corporation Law (the "Statutory Financial Statements") are the basis for dividend and tax determinations. Our audited consolidated financial statements for the year 2000 include the effects of inflation through December 31, 2000, while our Statutory Financial Statements include the effects of inflation only through December 31, 1995. See Notes 2a and 2b to our audited consolidated financial statementsFinancial Statements for (i) a summary of the principal differences between Brazilian GAAP and Brazilian Corporation Law as they relate to us and (ii) a reconciliation from Brazilian Corporation Law to Brazilian GAAP of shareholders' equity as of December 31, 20032004 and 20042005 and net income (loss) for each of the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2004.2005. Our Statutory Financial Statements also differ from our Consolidated Financial Statements in respect of certain reclassifications, and presentation of comparative information.

67


Table of Contents

Selected Financial Information

  Year ended December 31, 
  
Income Statement Data:  2000(1)  2001(2)  2002(2)  2003(2)  2004(2) 
      
  (thousands ofreais, except per share data)
Brazilian GAAP:           
Net operating revenue  4,652,184  6,158,408  7,071,368  7,915,194  9,064,855 
Cost of services  3,774,109  4,798,434  5,163,861  5,472,142  6,142,645 
      
Gross profit  878,075  1,359,974  1,907,507  2,443,052  2,922,210 
Operating expenses:           
     Selling expenses  381,371  724,570  763,375  821,656  1,086,946 
     General and administrative expenses  509,993  604,890  661,060  847,074  998,592 
     Other net operating expenses (income)  (56,964)  56,769  (118,496)  214,953  61,198 
      
Operating income (loss) before net financial           
     expenses  43,675  (26,255)  601,568  559,369  775,474 
Net financial expenses  5,577  236,357  618,899  844,802  579,514 
      
Operating income (loss)  38,098  (262,612)  17,331  (285,433)  195,960 
Net non-operating expenses (income)  (3,970)  93,071  64,497  541,691  112,073 
Employee's profit share  18,516  50,834  41,387  1,076  53,783 
      
 
Income (loss) before taxes and minority           
     interests  23,552  (406,517)  (123,215)  (828,200)  30,104 
 
Income and social contribution tax benefits  16,218  199,039  111,596  320,751  75,012 
      
Income (loss) before minority interests  39,770  (207,478)  (11,619)  (507,449)  105,116 
Minority interests  77,605  - ---  - ---  14  (6,276) 
 
Net income (loss)  117,375  (207,478)  (11,619)  (507,435)  98,840 
      
 
Number of Common Shares (millions)(3)  237,165  237,165  243,564  249,597  249,597 
Number of Preferred Shares (millions)(3)  292,260  293,218  292,020  289,850  292,011 
Operating Income (loss) per thousand           
     Common Shares (reais)(3)  0.16  (1.10)  0.07  (1.14)  0.79 
Net income (loss) per thousand Common           
     Shares (reais)(3)  0.49  (0.87)  (0.05)  (2.03)  0.40 
Dividends per thousand Common Shares           
     (reais)(3)  0.33  0.37  0.51  0.39  0.70 
Dividends per thousand Common Shares           
     (U.S. dollars)(3)(4)  0.17  0.16  0.14  0.14  0.26 
Dividends per thousand Preferred Shares           
     (reais)(3)  0.33  0.37  0.51  0.39  0.70 
Dividends per thousand Preferred Shares           
     (U.S. dollars)(3)(4)  0.17  0.16  0.14  0.14  0.26 
Income Statement Data:  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005 
      
Brazilian GAAP:           
Net operating revenue  6,158,408  7,071,368  7,915,194  9,064,855  10,138,684 
Cost of services  4,798,434  5,163,861  5,472,142  6,142,645  6,525,898 
      
Gross profit  1,359,974  1,907,507  2,443,052  2,922,210  3,612,786 
Operating expenses:           
     Selling expenses  724,570  763,375  821,656  1,086,946  1,656,242 
     General and administrative expenses  604,890  661,060  847,074  998,592  1,264,741 
     Other net operating expenses           
     (income) 56,769  (118,496) 214,953  61,198  626,306 
      
Operating income (loss) before net           
     financial expenses  (26,255) 601,568  559,369  775,474  65,497 
Net financial expenses  236,357  618,899  844,802  579,514  596,239 
      
Operating income (loss) (262,612) 17,331  (285,433) 195,960  (530,742)
Net non-operating expenses (income) 93,071  64,497  541,691  112,073  (149,024)
Employee's profit share  50,834  41,387  1,076  53,783  
      
 
Income (loss) before taxes and minority           
     interests  (406,517) (123,215) (828,200) 30,104  (679,766)
 
Income and social contribution tax           
     benefits  199,039  111,596  320,751  75,012  389,066 
      
Income (loss) before minority interests  (207,478) (11,619) (507,449) 105,116  (290,700)
Minority interests  ---  ---  14  (6,276) (12,971)
 
Net income (loss) (207,478) (11,619) (507,435) 98,840  (303,671)
      
 
 
Number of Common Shares (millions)(1) 237,165  243,564  249,597  249,597  249,597 
Number of Preferred Shares           
millions)(1) 293,218  292,020  289,850  292,011  305,701 
Net income (loss) per thousand           
     Common Shares (reais)(1) (0.87) (0.05) (2.03) 0.40  (1.22)
Dividends per thousand Common           
     Shares (reais)(1) 0.37  0.51  0.39  0.70  0.98 
Dividends per thousand Common           
     Shares (dollars)(1)(2) 0.16  0.14  0.14  0.26  0.42 
Dividends per thousand Preferred           
     Shares (reais)(1) 0.37  0.51  0.39  0.70  0.98 
Dividends per thousand Preferred           
     Shares (dollars)(1)(2) 0.16  0.14  0.14  0.26  0.42 

(1)Presented in constantreaisof December 31, 2000.
(2)     Pursuant to Brazilian GAAP, our audited consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004 no longer recognize the effects of inflation after January 1, 2001 and are not restated in constantreais.
(3)    See Note 3s to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
(4)(2)    Dividends per thousand shares were converted into dollars at the Commercial Market selling rate of R$1.9552.3200 per U.S. dollar on December 31, 2000, of R$2.32 per U.S. dollar on December 31, 2001, of R$3.5333 per U.S. dollar on December 31, 2002, of R$2.8892 per U.S. dollar on December 31, 2003, and of R$2.6544 per U.S. dollar on December 31, 2004, and of R$2.3407 per dollar on December 31, 2005, respectively.
 

78


Table of Contents

Selected Financial Information (continued)

  Year ended December 31, 
  
Income Statement Data           
(continued)  2000(1)   2001(2)  2002(2)   2003(2)  2004(2) 
      
  (thousands ofreais, except per share data)
U.S. GAAP:           
Net income (loss)  7,096  (169,716)  317,280  (287,739)  284,907 
Net income (loss) per thousand           
     shares (reais)(5)          
     Common Shares–Basic   0.01     (0.32)     0.59     (0.54)  0.53 
     Common Shares–Diluted   0.01     (0.32)     0.59     (0.54)  0.53 
     Preferred Shares–Basic   0.01     (0.32)     0.59     (0.54)  0.53 
     Preferred Shares–Diluted   0.01     (0.32)     0.59     (0.54)  0.53 
       
   Income Statement Data           
(continued) 2001  2002  2003  2004  2005 
      
U.S.GAAP:           
Net income (loss) (169,716) 317,280  (287,739) 284,907  168,790 
Net income (loss) per           
     thousand shares (reais)(3)          
     Common Shares–Basic  (0.32) 0.59  (0.54) 0.53  0.30 
     Common Shares–Diluted  (0.32) 0.59  (0.54) 0.53  0.30 
     Preferred Shares–Basic  (0.32) 0.59  (0.54) 0.53  0.30 
     Preferred Shares–Diluted  (0.32) 0.59  (0.54) 0.53  0.30 
      
_____________________________

(5)(3)     In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS")No. 128, "Earnings"Earnings Per Share," or SFAS 128, basic and diluted earnings per share have been calculated, for U.S.US GAAP purposes, using the "two class method." See Note 33e to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
  At December 31, 
  
  2000(1)  2001(2)  2002(2)  2003(2)  2004(2) 
      
  (thousands ofreais
Balance Sheet Data:           
Brazilian GAAP:           
     Intangibles(3)  472,680  372,537  470,544  531,556  863,929 
     Property, plant and equipment,           
               net(4)  11,498,689  12,240,270  11,260,625  9,567,243  9,370,091 
      
Total assets  14,992,076  15,772,551  16,432,198  15,622,803  17,402,504 
      
     Loans and financing – current           
               portion  1,253,861  530,661  683,276  1,990,274  1,103,133 
     Loans and financing – non-current           
               portion  1,959,207  3,504,489  4,398,532  2,645,563  4,178,365 
      
Total liabilities (including funds for           
     capitalization and minority           
     interests)  6,243,687  7,796,249  8,808,409  8,781,841  10,921,139 
      
 
Shareholders' equity  8,748,389  7,976,302  7,623,789  6,840,962  6,481,365 
      
 
U.S. GAAP:           
     Intangibles(5)  1,178,789  873,559  830,328  978,414  1,419,363 
     Property, plant and equipment, net  11,292,820  12,139,658  11,670,826  10,035,667  9,795,888 
      
Total assets  15,807,758  16,546,508  17,202,182  16,538,085  18,383,735 
      
     Loans and financing – current           
               portion  1,120,475  525,137  480,666  1,737,494  834,321 
     Loans and financing – non-current           
               portion  1,959,281  3,504,489  4,252,221  2,455,897  3,990,371 
      
Total liabilities (including funds for           
     capitalization and minority           
     interests)  7,590,763  8,711,767  9,390,158  9,281,644  11,311,615 
      
 
 
Shareholders' equity  8,216,995  7,834,741  7,812,024  7,256,440  7,072,120 
      

8


Table of Contents


  At December 31 
  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005 
      
  (Thousands ofreais)
Balance Sheet Data:           
Brazilian GAAP:           
     Intangibles(1) 372,537  470,544  531,556  863,929  649,949 
 
     Property, plant and equipment, net  12,240,270  11,260,625  9,567,243  9,370,091  8,687,607 
      
Total assets  15,772,551  16,432,198  15,622,803  17,402,504  16,728,089 
      
     Loans and financing current           
               portion  530,661  683,276  1,990,274  1,103,133  1,489,384 
     Loans and financing – non-current           
               portion  3,504,489  4,398,532  2,645,563  4,178,365  3,418,841 
      
Total liabilities (including funds for           
     capitalization and minority           
     interests) 7,796,249  8,808,409  8,781,841  10,921,139  11,231,482 
      
 
Shareholders' equity  7,976,302  7,623,789  6,840,962  6,481,365  5,496,607 
      
 
US GAAP:           
     Intangibles(2) 873,559  830,328  978,414  1,419,363  1,410,004 
 
     Property, plant and equipment, net  12,139,658  11,670,826  10,035,667  9,795,888  9,224,017 
      
Total assets  16,546,508  17,202,182  16,538,085  18,383,735  18,100,528 
      
     Loans and financing – current           
               portion  525,137  480,666  1,737,494  834,321  1,198,051 
     Loans and financing – non-current           
               portion  3,504,489  4,252,221  2,455,897  3,990,371  3,254,622 
      
Total liabilities (including funds for           
     capitalization and minority           
     interests) 8,711,767  9,390,158  9,281,644  11,311,615  11,542,343 
      
Shareholders' equity  7,834,741  7,812,024  7,256,440  7,072,120  6,558,186 
      

(1)Presented in constantreaisof December 31, 2000.
(2)     Pursuant to Brazilian GAAP, our audited consolidated financial statements at December 31, 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004 no longer recognize the effects of inflation after January 1, 2001 and are not restated in constantreais.
(3)     Includes the goodwill from our acquisition of a controlling stake in CRT, which was calculated based on book value.
(4)     Stated at indexed cost up to December 31, 2000, less accumulated depreciation. See Note 3g to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
(5)(2)    Intangibles under U.S.US GAAP include the goodwill from our merger with Telesc, Telegoiás, Telebrasília, Telemat, Telems, Teleron, Teleacre and CTMR and our merger with CRT at December 31, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2004,2005, and amounts relating to our PCSpersonal communication system (“PCS”) licenses at December 31, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2004.2005. See Note 33o to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

9


Table of Contents

Exchange Rates

     Until March 14, 2005, there were two principal foreign exchange markets in Brazil: the commercial rate exchange market (the "Commercial Market") and the floating rate exchange market (the "Floating Market"). Most foreign trade and financial foreign currency exchange transactions were carried out on the Commercial Market. Purchases of foreign exchange in the Commercial Market could be carried out only through a financial institution authorized to buy and sell currency in that market. The Floating Market rate generally applied to specific transactions tofor which the Commercial Market rate didapproval of the Brazilian Central Bank (or the “Central Bank”) was not apply.required.

     Aside from the two mentioned principal exchange markets, there was also a market for international transfers inreais – TIRs, which followed its own rules. Due to the enactment of Resolution 3.265 ofOn March 4, 2005, the National Monetary Council ("CMN"(“CMN”) on March 4, 2005,enacted new rules with respect to the foreign exchange markets were unified in a single market. Additional rules were issued on March 9, 2005. The market expects the new regulation to provide a more flexible environment and foster foreign investment in Brazil. The potential impact of the new rules is still uncertain. Prior to February 1, 1999, the exchange rate in each market was established independently, resulting in different rates during some periods. Since February 1, 1999, the Central Bank authorized the unification of the exchange positions of the Brazilian financial institutions inResolution 3.265 unified the Commercial Market and the Floating Market which ledin a single market (the “Foreign Exchange Market”). The new rules also eliminated previous restrictions thereby allowing more flexibility for the purchase and sale of foreign currency. The unified Foreign Exchange Market is intended to a convergencesimplify both inbound and out bound exchange transactions by permitting exchange contracts to be executed by the local institutions authorized to deal in the pricing and liquidity of both markets. However, each market continued to have a specific regulation. Most trade and financial transactions were carried out on the Commercial Market. The foreign exchange. Foreign currencies may only be purchased through a Brazilian financial institution authorized to operate in the market. Furthermore, under the Foreign Exchange Market, Brazilian entities and individuals may purchase and sell foreign currency in transactions of any nature and without any limitations on the amounts involved, subject to the legality of the transaction and in accordance with the economic basis of the transactions and obligations set forth in the respective documentation. Rates are freely negotiated but may be strongly influenced bythe Central Bank intervention.may, in limited circumstances, intervene in the Foreign Exchange Market to curb excessive volatility.

     Under theReal Plan ("Real Plan"), adopted on July 1, 1994, thereal was introduced as the official unit of Brazilian currency, with eachreal having an exchange rate of R$l.00 to U.S.$US$1.00. The issuance ofreais was initially subject to quantitative limits backed by a corresponding amount of U.S. dollars in reserves, but the government subsequently expanded those quantitative limits and allowed thereal to float, with parity between thereal/U.S. dollar (R$l.00 to U.S.$US$1.00) as a ceiling.

     Since January 15, 1999 thereal has been allowed to float freely. In 2000, thereal devalued by 9.3% against the U.S. dollar to R$1.9554. Further deterioration in the political and economic environment in 2001, in addition to the Brazilian energy crisis, resulted in thereal devaluing by 18.7% against the U.S. dollar in that year. In the final quarter of 2001, however, thereal appreciated by 13.1% from R$2.6713 per U.S.$1.00 at September 30, 2001 to R$2.3204 per U.S.$1.00 on December 31, 2001.

In 2002, as a reaction to political and economic uncertainties, the global economic downturn, the crisis in Argentina and the Brazilian presidential elections, the U.S. dollar appreciated by 52.3% against thereal to R$3.5333 per U.S.$US$1.00 at December 31, 2002. Thereal recovered in 2003, appreciating by 18.2% to R$2.8892 per U.S.$US$1.00, at December 31, 2003. In 2004, therealappreciated by 8.1% against the U.S. dollar, quoted at R$2.6544 per U.S.$US$1.00 on December 31, 2004. In 2005, the real appreciated by 13.4% against the dollar, quoted at R$2.3407 per US$1.00 on December 31, 2005. We cannot assure youguarantee that thereal will not substantially devalue again in the future. See "—Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Brazil."

910


Table of Contents

Selling Rate for Dollars

     As of May 31, 2005,2006, the Commercial Market selling rate published by the Brazilian Central Bank was R$2.40382.3005 per U.S.$US$1.00.

Commercial Market Selling Rate for U.S. Dollars

The following table sets forth the reported high and low Commercial Market selling rates for U.S. dollars for the months indicated.

  High  Low 
   
 
December 2004  2.7867  2.6544 
January 2005  2.7222  2.6248 
February 2005  2.6320  2.5621 
March 2005  2.7621  2.6011 
April 2005  2.6598  2.5195 
May 2005  2.5146  2.3784 
  High  Low 
   
 
December 2005  2.3735  2.1800 
January 2006  2.3460  2.2116 
February 2006  2.2217  2.1177 
March 2006  2.2238  2.1067 
April 2006  2.1534  2.0884 
May 2006  2.3235  2.0586 

_____________________________

Source: Brazilian Central Bank

     The following table sets forth the reported high and low, average and period-end Commercial Market selling rates for U.S. dollars for the annual periods indicated. The average Commercial Market selling rates represent the average of the month-end commercial market selling rates (R$/U.S.$US$) during the relevant period.

For the Year Ended December 31,  High  Low  Average  Period End  High  Low  Average  Period End 
        
2000   1.985   1.723  1.835           1.955 
2001   2.801   1.936  2.352           2.320  2.801  1.936  2.352  2.320 
2002   3.955   2.271  2.915           3.533  3.955  2.271  2.915  3.533 
2003   3.662   2.822  3.060           2.889  3.662  2.822  3.060  2.889 
2004   3.205   2.654  2.926           2.654  3.205  2.654  2.926  2.654 
2005  2.762  2.163  2.434  2.340 
___________________________

Source: Brazilian Central Bank

     Brazilian law provides that whenever there is a serious imbalance in Brazil's balance of payments or reliable information to foresee such an imbalance temporary restrictions may be imposed on remittances of foreign capital abroad. We cannot assure youguarantee that these types ofrestrictive measures will not be taken by the Brazilian government in the future. See "—Risk Factors—Risks RelatingRelated to Operations In Brazil."

Risk Factors11


Table of Contents

RISK FACTORS

     The following are risk factors that relate materially to our company and to an investment in our Preferred Shares or ADSs. Our business, results of operations or financial condition could be harmed if any of these risks materialize and, as a result, the trading price of our Preferred Shares or ADSs could decline and a holder of those securities could lose a substantial portion or all of his investment.

Risks RelatingRelated to Our CompanyBusiness

Regulatory developments could affect our services, including placing restrictions on the rates we charge for our services, which could adversely impact our businessbusiness.

     Our business, includingmain activities, as well as the services that we provide and the rates that we charge, ismain activities of our competitors, are subject to comprehensive regulation under Brazilian law. Our ability to retain our concessions is a precondition to our success, but in light ofand inspection by the regulatory framework, it is possible that the terms of our concessions could be modified in an adverse manner.

10


Table of Contents

     Under Brazilian law, public-regime companies, like our company, must have the rates that they charge for products and services approved by Agência Nacional de Telecomunicações ("Anatel"). On June 20, 2003,The regulations enacted by Anatel enacted Resolution 341, which provides for new typesand applicable to our activities include provisions regarding charges, fees, universalization, quality of Anatel concession contracts, effective from January 1, 2006 until 2025. The new formservices, net expansion, licenses, competition, changes in our corporate control (including participation by foreign investors), interconnection and other operational issues related to the functioning of concession contract provides forour telecommunications net.

     Any changes in the waylaws, regulations or governmental policies applicable to the telecommunications sector or in the interpretation of such laws and regulations may have material adverse effects on our financial condition and results of operations.

     Moreover, it is not possible to predict which rates are set. For example,policies for the General Price Index - Internal Availability,Índicetelecommunications sector will be adopted by the government in the future or the consequences of such policies to our business and the business of our competitors.

     The new concession contracts contain sections regarding the new Plano Geral de Preços – Disponibilidade InternaMetas de Qualidade (General Plan for Quality Targets (IGP-DI), will no longer be used; the “PGMQ”) and the new Plano Geral de Metas de Universalização (General Plan for Universalization Targets; the “PGMU”) related to determine(i) new targets for the annual inflation-based adjustmentsuniversalization of services; (ii) change in the criteria for the charging of local calls, substituting pulses for minutes in the calculation of charges; (iii) new parameters for the adjustment of rates (the Telecommunications Industry Index (“IST”) became the official index to rates. Private-regimemeasure the sector inflation and adjust rates, although private-regime companies that compete with us do not require Anatel approval when setting their rates and may unilaterally determine the prices that they charge for their services. Asservices) and interconnection rates; and (iv) portability of fixed line telephone numbers.

     These changes may affect the financial balance of our concession contract and adversely affect our business and financial conditions. We are currently discussing certain terms of the new concession contract with Anatel to reconcile the face that such terms do not contemplate investments made by us to reach the previous targets determined by our old concession contract, the fact that we are to bear the costs associated with the new universalization targets and the fact that the IST may not accurately reflect inflation in a result, adverse changes in Brazilian telecommunications regulations and non-approval or even delaysgiven period. We can not assure that we will be able to successfully challenge such provisions.

Termination of Concession Contracts

     According to the General Telecommunications Law, as well as according to the Concession Contracts, the concessions are revocable in the approvalfollowing situations:

12


Table of Contents

  • the occurrence of:
(a)a split-up, spin-off, amalgamation, merger, capital reduction or transfer of our corporate power without Anatel’s authorization;
(b)the transfer of the concessions without Anatel’s authorization;
(c)our dissolution or bankruptcy; or
(d)an extraordinary situation where Brazilian government intervention, although legally possible, is not undertaken since such intervention would prove to be inconvenient, unnecessary or would result in unfair benefits for us.

A proposed bill of law terminating monthly subscription fees may adversely impactaffect our operationsbusiness and competitive position.financial conditions.

     On May 12, 2004, the Consumer Defense Committee of the House of Representatives approved a bill of law proposing the termination of the monthly subscription fees charged for fixed-line services by the Brazilian telephone concessionaires, including Brasil Telecom.our company. The bill is still under consideration before the House of Representatives, where a special committee was created on June 3, 2005 to discuss and to make a report regarding the bill. The bill will be subject to the approval of other Committees within the House of Representatives, the Senate and President Lula's signature.the President. In 2005 the revenue of monthly subscription fees charged for fixed-line was R$3.5 billion. Should this bill be approved, it willmay have an impact on our current rate structure and, as a result, our operations and competitive position could be adversely impacted.affected.

We are subject to financial covenants and other contractual provisions under our existing indebtedness. Failure to comply with these provisions could adversely affect our business and financial condition.

     The agreements that govern our debt, including our credit facilities with the National Bank for Social and Economic Development (Banco Nacional de Desenvolvimento Econômico e Social -– “BNDES”"BNDES"), contain a number of significant covenants, thatthe failure to comply with which could adversely impact our business. In particular, the terms of these agreements restrict our ability, and the ability of our subsidiaries, to incur additional debt, make capital expenditures, grant liens, pledge assets, sell or dispose of assets and make certain acquisitions, mergers and consolidations. Furthermore, in accordance with a number of our debt agreements, including our credit facilities with BNDES, we are required to comply with these covenants and maintain certain specified financial ratios in order to maintain the current maturity dates for these debt agreements. As a general rule, the occurrence of an event of default under a credit facility with BNDES may trigger the acceleration of other agreements representing our indebtedness.

     During December 2004, we initiated a process of adjustment ofadjusting the covenants ofrelated to certain agreements with BNDES, in order to fit them to the new reality of the telecommunications sector and of our company.

     In the loan agreement signed during 2004, As part of this adjustment process, we and BNDES and Brasil Telecom introduced a new mechanism pursuant to whichin the credit facility agreements. In the event of a failure by Brasil Telecomus to comply with thesemi-annual financial covenants, instead of giving the right to BNDES to accelerate the wholeentire amount of the debt, gives it the right towhich may trigger cross-defaults in our debt instruments, BNDES may request the retention of funds in a blocked account in an amount equivalent to three times the highest installment of principal plus interest due under such agreement.agreement.. If Brasil Telecom,we, after the retention, failscreation of such a blocked account, we again in complyingfail to comply with the financial covenants, then BNDES will have the right, but not the obligation, to declare the acceleration of the debt. The negotiation mentioned above includes the extension ofadjustment process extended these remedies to all BNDES agreements to which we are a party.party, effective as of December 31, 2004. Any failure by us to comply with the financial covenants of our debt instruments, and subsequent acceleration of our debt by BNDES, would have a material adverse effect on our ability to conduct our operations.

     On January 5, 2006, we announced that we intended to book provisions in our financial statements for the year ended December 20, 2004,31, 2005, in the amount of R$622 million (see description in PART II of this report in our Financial Statements). Such provisions, if booked, could affect our results and, accordingly, jeopardize the compliance in the fiscal year ended on December 31, 2005 until and including the third quarter of 2006 of financial covenants set forth in certain debt agreements, including the credit facilities with BNDES, and theEscritura de Emissão,

13


Table of Contents

relating to the Debentures of the 4th issuance, being the 3rd public, the loan agreements entered into with Japan Bank of International Cooperation (“JBIC”) and with Sumitomo – Mitsui Banking Corporation. Therefore, prior to making the decision to book the provisions, we initiated negotiations with our creditors to adjust the affected financial covenants, in particular the ratio between EBTIDA and the financial expenses.

     On January 6, 2006, we entered into negotiations with BNDES and the financial institutions involvedacting as its agents under the credit facilities. In view of our failure to comply with certain financial covenants, BNDES decided to retain funds in a blocked account equivalent to the highest installment plus interest due under agreement in an amount of approximately R$250 million. In February 2005, the agreements were amended to determine that the funds to be retained shall be equivalent to the highest installment plus interest, instead of three times such figure, as provided for in the agreementinitial amendment to the credit facilities.

     On January 30, 2006, the holders of our outstanding debentures of the 4th issuance approved an adjustment to the changes requested by usfinancial covenant relating to the ratio between Consolidated EBITDA and forwardedConsolidated Financial Expenses, contained in Section 4.19.1(e)(i)Escritura de Emissão from equal or higher than 2.25, to equal or higher than 1.5, as of the process to BNDES. BNDES approved these changes on February 1st,fourth quarter of 2005, with validity as from December 31, 2004.until and including the third quarter of 2006. If we had not obtained the referred approval from BNDES,this amendment, we would not behave been in compliance with this financial covenant for the covenant relatedfourth quarter of 2005, when we reached a ratio of 2.17. See “Item 10. Additional Information – Material Contracts – Debentures – Escritura de Emissão.”

     On February 17, 2006, we signed the First Amendment to the levelLoan Agreement entered into with JBIC, dated March 18, 2004, and the First Amendment to the Loan Agreement entered into with Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, dated March 24, 2004. These amendments adjusted the financial covenants in each respective loan agreement relating to EBTIDA and the financial expenses from equal or higher than 2.25, to equal or higher than 1.5, as of the fourth quarter until and including the third quarter of 2006. For the fourth quarter of 2005 we achieved a Consolidated EBITDA over Consolidated Financial Expenses ratio of 2.17. See “Item 10. Additional Information – Material Contracts – JBIC – Guaranteed Loan.”

     Regarding the loan agreements with BNDES we failed to comply with the financial covenant of Brasil Telecom Participações’ consolidated results. The Consolidated EBITDA over Consolidated Financial Expenses ratio was supposed to remain above or equal to 2.50, but we reached 2.17 in the fourth quarter of 2006. Following the provisions established in the agreements, BNDES is running retention up to R$250 million of our EBITDA margin, as definedcash investments, without penalties concerning interest or fees, which will be valid until we achieve the 2.50 ratio.

     On February 3, 2006, we obtained a waiver from BNDES in such loans and financing contracts.order to avoid the acceleration of the agreements in view of a potential failure to comply with the financial covenants in the first semester of 2006. See “Item 10. Additional Information – Material Contracts – JBIC – BNDES Loan Agreements.”

     Compliance with these covenants in future periods will depend upon our financial and operating performance, which may be affected by adverse business, market and economic conditions. If we are unable to comply with these covenants, or to obtain waivers from our lenders, the maturity dates of our debt agreements may be accelerated and the terms of our debt agreements may be otherwise amended adversely. If we are unable to meet our debt service obligations or comply with our debt covenants, we could be forced to restructure or refinance our indebtedness, seek additional equity capital or sell assets. See Item 5 "Operating“Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Indebtedness."

11


Table of Contents

Certain beneficial shareholdersowners directly or indirectly control a large percentage of our voting shares, and their interests may conflict with the interests of our other shareholders, including minority shareholders. Disputes among our controlling shareholders and entities that manage our controlling shareholders have had and could in the future have a material adverse effect on our management and operations.

CONTROL ISSUES

     We are controlled by Brasil Telecom Participações S.A., which is in turn controlled by Solpart Participações S.A. ("Solpart"), the ownership of which is held bywhose stockholders are Timepart, Techold and TII. As the controlling shareholder of Brasil Telecom Participações S.A., Solpart has the power to modify our business plan, modify our dividend plan and sell our material assets. As of the date of this annual report, control of Solpart, as well as certain actions taken by SolpartSolpart’s shareholders and their affiliates are the subject of a number of judicial and arbitration proceedings.

14


Table of Contents

     On March 9, 2005, International Equity Investments, Inc,Inc. as the sole shareholder of CVC/Opportunity Equity Partners LP (since renamed Citigroup Venture Capital International Brazil, LP) ("CVC LP") – which holds a direct stake in Brasil Telecom Participações S.A. and Opportunitya substantial indirect stake in Zain Participações S.A. ("Zain"(“Zain”), a company which integratesthat indirectly owns a majority of the controlling corporate structurevoting interests in Solpart, and therefore indirectly owns a majority of the voting shares of Brasil Telecom Participações S.A. and Brasil Telecom S.A. - ("CVC LP"), sent a public notice informing aboutour company, publicly announced the oustingouster of CVC/Opportunity Equity Partners, Ltd ("CVC Ltd"), currently named Opportunity Equity Partners, Ltd., (“Opportunity Ltd.”) from the management of CVC LP, having designated as a substitute,LP. Opportunity Ltd. was replaced by a new company incorporated abroad, named Citigroup Venture Capital International Brazil LLC ("CVC International Brazil").

     On March 9, 2005, CVC LP, in compliance with CVM/SEP/GEA-2 Written Notice 225/05 and the terms of CVM Instruction 358, informed us that:

  • In March 2005,announced that International Equity Investments, Inc. and the CVC LPInternational Brazil had entered into certain agreements with Investidores Institucionais Fundo de Investimento em Ações ("(“Investidores Institucionais FIA"FIA”), Caixa de Previdência dos Funcionários do Banco do Brasil – Previ ("Previ"(“Previ”), Fundação dos Economiários Federais – Funcef ("Funcef"(“Funcef”) and Fundação Petrobras de Seguridade Social – Petros ("Petros"(“Petros”), including the Shareholders Agreementa voting agreement with respect to their shares of Zain as announced in the material fact published on 03.11.05 (collectively, the "Agreements"“Agreements”);.

  • The     Under the Agreements, establish that the CVC LP and the Investidores Institucionais FIA, with combined shareholdingsholdings of aroundapproximately 90% of the voting and total capitalshares of Zain, will conjunctly performjointly exercise the corporate control of such companyZain and Invitel S.A. ("Invitel"(“Invitel”), a company controlled by Zain with aboutapproximately 68% of its voting and total capital,shares, and in which Previ, Funcef, Petros and other non-publicly heldBrazilian pension entities hold nearly the totalityall of the remaining voting and total capital.shares. The Agreements also establish that the parties are to attempt to disinvest, under identical terms, conjunctlyjointly and in an organized manner, their shareholdings in Zain and Invitel, companies which control, among other companies, Brasil Telecom Participações S.A.,us, our companyParent, and our subsidiary, 14 Brasil Telecom Celular S.A. (“BrT Celular”).

  • In the context ofconnection with the execution of the Agreements, Previ, Funcef and Petros signed the Put Option on Shares Issued by Zain Agreement, granting the CVC LP a put option on its Zain shares, which may be exercised inunder certain circumstances during a limited period of time, but not before November 2007. If and whenCVC LP’s right to exercise the CVC LP exercises its put option a rightis conditioned toon the occurrence of certain future and uncertain events, some of which are out ofbeyond the control of the CVC LP, Investidores Institucionais FIA, Previ, Funcef and Petros,Petros. If CVC LP exercises its put option, the exercise price is to be set toat R$1,045,941,692.43, adjusted by the variation of the IGP-DI Index + 5% p.a..p.a. The fulfillment of the conditions to the exercise of such put option granted by Previ, Funcef and Petros does not depend orand is not tied to the occurrence of any operation or business involving, directly or indirectly, property or other assets owned by Zain, Invitel or any of their controlled companies, among which, Brasil Telecom Participações S.A.,including us, our companyParent and 14 Brasil Telecom Celular S.A.”BrT Celular.

     On April 12, 2005, Anatel issued a decision approving among other thingsthings: (i) the replacement of CVC LtdOpportunity Ltd. by CVC International Brazil as managerthe general partner of CVC LP; (ii) the replacement of CVC/Opportunity Equity Partners Administradora de Recursos Ltda. by Angra Partners Consultoria Empresarial e Participações Ltda. as the new manager of Investidores Institucionais FIA, one of thean indirect controlling shareholdersshareholder of Brasil Telecom Participações S.A. and Brasil Telecom S.A.; and (iii) thecertain changes resulting from the ZainAgreements entered into by CVC LP and Futeretel S.A. Shareholders' Agreements.Investidores Institucionais. This decision was published in the Federal Gazette (Diário Oficial) on April 14, 2005. After reviewing our appeal filed by prior management related to Opportunity Ltd., Anatel upheld its decision dated April 12, 2005.2005 decision.

     On October 6, 2003, Fundação 14 de Previdência Privada (“Fundação 14”), successor to Fundação Sistel de Seguridade Social, was prevented by the other shareholders of Investidores Institucionais FIA from exercising its voting rights duringat the Investidores Institucionais FIA's Unitholders Meeting. At the saidsuch meeting, Banco Opportunity S.A. was ousted from the administration of Investidores Institucionais FIA. In consequence of this event,Consequently, Fundação 14 brought an ordinary action before the 5th Federal Court of Rio de Janeiro against Previ and several defendants,investors in Investidores Institucionais FIA, seeking a declaration that the resolutions adopted at the Investidores Institucionais FIA's Unitholders Meeting held on October 6, 2003 were invalid. At the dateOn May 18, 2005, an injunction granted on May 17, 2005 in favor of this annual report, this matter continuesFundação 14 by a federal tribunal in Rio de Janeiro, which would have allowed Banco Opportunity S.A. to be the subject of judicial proceedings. Recently, the same plaintiff brought a motion for preliminary relief before the Court as an incidental proceedingreturn to the ordinary action against the same defendants, seeking to prevent any transactions involving the assetsmanagement of Investidores Institucionais FIA, including agreementsFIA’s was revoked by a decision granted by Superior Tribunal de Justiça (“STJ”), the highest Brazilian court for non-constitutional matters; in the sale, encumbrance and/or acquisitionproceeding SLS 128. On July 12, 2005, Fundação 14 filed before the 5th Federal Court of interestsRio de Janeiro a motion to abandon this lawsuit. To the best of our knowledge, this STJ decision is being challenged by Banco Opportunity S.A.

15


Table of Contents

     On July 27, 2005, at an Extraordinary General Shareholders’ Meeting of our Parent, the fund. On April 13, 2005, a preliminary order was issued suspendingshareholders removed and replaced the effects of any acts for the alienation or encumbrance of Investidores Institucionais FIA assets, or the acquisition of interests by the Fund until a subsequent decision, which will be issued after the defendants have submitted their arguments.

     Pending the resolutionmembers of the disputes described above,board. The new board members assumed their board positions on August 25, 2005, and at their first formal meeting replaced the officers of our Parent.

     At an Extraordinary General Shareholders’ Meeting held on September 30, 2005, our shareholders removed and replaced the prior members of our Board of Directors may be unable to act(except for Mr. Antonio Cardoso dos Santos, who was elected by the holders of our preferred stock and remains a director). Also on mattersSeptember 30, 2005, our newly constituted Board of importance to us,Directors replaced all of the senior officers with a new management team, including Mr. Ricardo Knoepfelmacher, as Chief Executive Officer, Charles Lagana Putz, as Chief Financial Officer and Investor Relations Officer, Luiz Francisco Tenorio Perrone as Human Resources Officer, and Francisco Aurelio Sampaio Santiago as Network Officer. Subsequently, at an Extraordinary General Shareholders’ Meetings held on November 17, 2005 and January 12, 2006, our shareholders removed and replaced the members of our fiscal council (which functions as our audit committee for purposes of SEC and NYSE rules and regulations).

     The process of replacing the directors and officers of Brasil Telecom Participações S.A. and Brasil Telecom S.A. was litigious, as evidenced by various lawsuits filed by our former managers and their affiliates in an attempt to resume their former management roles. While we cannot predict the cumulative effect of this ongoing litigation on our business and results of operations, extensive litigation regarding ownership of our company creates uncertainty with respect to the identity of our current and future management, which may impair our ability to carry out our business plan.

     ASSESSMENT OF THE ACTIONS OF OUR FORMER MANAGERS UNDER THE MANAGEMENT OF OPPORTUNITY LTD.

     In observance of their fiduciary duties, under the terms of the applicable legislation, the current management of Brasil Telecom Participações S.A. and the current management of Brasil Telecom S.A. have performed and continue to perform internal investigations of the businesses and operations conducted by the former managers appointed by Opportunity, Ltd. In the course of such investigations, the current managers identified management acts indicating abuse of controlling power, breach of fiduciary duties, and conflict of interest, as well as various violations of Brazilian law and Companies Bylaws.

     Therefore, in accordance with a notice to shareholders released on December 12, 2005, we filed a formal complaint with the CVM - the Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commission, against our former management, Opportunity Fund and other individuals and companies, both domestic and foreign, linked to our former management, who have been involved with, or participated in any way, or benefited from the actions which are the object of the formal complaint. On March 21, 2006, a second formal complaint, as an amendment to the first complaint, was submitted to CVM, in light of new management actions identified.

     We intend to pursue all appropriate legal measures to recover potential losses and damages suffered, consistent with our best interests and fiduciary obligations. On April 28, 2006, at Ordinary and Extraordinary Meetings of Shareholders of Brasil Telecom S.A. and Brasil Telecom Participações S.A., the shareholders of each company approved the filing of damages lawsuits against prior management.

     Despite the potentially misleading actions of our prior management as described above, to the knowledge of our management, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

ISSUES ARISING OUT OF OVERLAPOVERLAPPING OF LICENSES WITH TIMA TELECOM ITALIA AFFILIATE

     TII is controlledWhen we received the certification of achievement of universalization targets for 2003, established by Telecom Italia S.p.A. ("Telecom Italia"). Telecom Italia acquired, through various subsidiaries now consolidated into TIM Brasil Serviços e Participações S.A., ("TIM"), authorizations to deploy personal communication service ("PCS"Anatel, we were already providing fixed telephone services (“PSTN”) at domestic local and long distance modalities (“DLD”) intra-regional in the whole country, including Region II where we provide fixed-lineof the General Concession Plan (“PGO”).

1216


Table of Contents

services. Because     After the achievement of such targets, Anatel, in January 2004, issued authorizations enlarging our companypotential areas of operations: PSTN local and TII were deemed to be affiliates, TIM could not exploit the PCS authorizations before January 1, 2004 unless either Telecom Italia ceased to be our affiliate or we achieved sooner our 2003 universalization targets. In order to allow TIM to exploit its PCS licenses, TII, TecholdLDN in Regions I and Timepart agreed to amend the shareholders agreement dated July 19, 1998, (as amended, the "Solpart Agreement"III of PGO (and in a few sectors of Region II); International Long Distance Call (“ILD”) on August 27, 2002. Following the amendment, TII was not a controlling shareholder or affiliatein Regions I, II and III of PGO; mobile telephone, by means of our company but retained a rightsubsidiary BrT Celular, in Region II of Personal Mobile Service (“SMP”). Our existing concession agreements were also expanded, allowing LDN calls to reacquire such an interest under certain circumstances.

     Since we received certification of our compliance with the 2003 targets established by Anatel, we have begun offering national and international fixed-line services as well as mobile services.any Brazilian territory. If TII were to reacquireacquires an indirect controlling interest in our company, our companyParent, TII and TIM wouldcould be deemed affiliatesviewed as affiliated companies under the Brazilian telecommunications law, andlaw. As a result, our ability to offer nationalrender domestic (NLD) and international fixed-line(ILD) fixed telephone services, as well as mobile telephone services, in the same regions as TIM, would be at risk of being terminatedpartial restriction or revocation by Anatel.

     On January 16, 2004, Anatel issued an Act (the “Anatel Decree”) pursuant to which Anatel consented to an41,780, establishing a period of 18 month periodmonths during which TII maycould reacquire an indirect controlling interest in our company, providedas long as TII does not participate or vote inneither participated nor voted on any mattersissues related to the overlapping services offered by our companyus and TIM, such as nationalincluding domestic and international long distance fixed-line servicescalls and mobile telephone services. On June 30, 2004, the Administrative Council for Economic Defense – CADE, in the records of Writ of Prevention 08700.000018/2004 -68, set forth restrictions on the exercise of control rights by TII and its representatives over the Boards of Directors of Solpart, our Parent and our company.

     On April 28, 2005, certain TII affiliates and BrT Celular purported to enter into various corporate agreements, including an instrument called “Merger Agreement” and a “Protocol” related thereto. The April 28, 2005 agreements alleged that the proposed merger was justified as wella possible solution to the overlapping regulatory licenses and authorizations with TIM, and to avoid sanctions and penalties which could be imposed by Anatel. Certain actions contemplated by these agreements have since been forbidden by injunctions issued by the US and Brazilian courts. The agreements are also subject to legal challenges by our indirect shareholders. Regardless of whether the validity of the April 28, 2005 agreements is confirmed, there is the possibility that assets related to our fixed and mobile segments (see Note 43) will eventually lose their value as mobile services. If, aftera result of overlapping operations or sanctions issued by Anatel. It is possible that these agreements will be declared null and void by courts or in arbitration proceedings, which would remove TII from the 18-month period (expiringcontrol block of that group, eliminating the overlapping concessions and consequently, the regulatory risks. Nevertheless, it is not possible at this time to anticipate such legal developments and their future effects on our operations or financial statements.

     On July 7, 2005, Anatel declared, by means of Act 51,450, that the counting of an 18 2005),month term to solve the overlapping of licenses would start on the date of the effective return of TII to our company and Telecom Italia did not reach an agreementcontrol group. On July 26, 2005, Anatel, by means of Order 576/2005, declared that the counting of term would start on April 28, 2005. Therefore, according to Anatel, the interested companies shall adopt the measures necessary to eliminate the overlapping of licenses until the end of the 18 month term, October 2006, under the penalty of legal sanctions, which resolved the overlap, Anatel reserved the right to impose sanctions on anymay affect either companies or all involved parties.both of them.

     Depending on Anatel'sthe final decision theseof Anatel, the threatened sanctions could have a material adverse effect on ourthe business and operations.operations of us and our subsidiary, BrT Celular.

     Additionally, ANIMEC (the Brazilian Association of Investors of Capital Markets) filed an injunction before the Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica ("CADE") (Brazil's Antitrust Authority) to prevent TII from acquiring an indirect controlling interest in our company.     On March 17, 2004, the injunction was granted by unanimous decision15, 2006, we and TII appealed CADE's decision. In June 2004, CADE issued a new injunction granting TII the right to return to our control group so long as TII does not participate or vote in any matters related to the overlapping services or nominate any officers. To date, this matter remains unresolved since there is still an act of concentration on Anatel’s analysis, which assembles all the demands presented by TII and/or its opponents, and that will return to CADE’s analysis after Anatel’s decision.

     In order to eliminate the regulatory risk associated with the overlapping of licenses between TII and us and add value to our shareholders, our subsidiary, 14 Brasil TelecomBrT Celular, S.A.began an arbitration against TIM International N.V. (“BTC”TIMINT”) and us, and TII and TIM Brasil Serviços e Participações S.A. (“TIMB”), and collectively with TII the “TIM Group”) entered into a Merger Agreement and a related Protocol (collectively, the “Merger Agreement”) on April 28, 2005. Among other things this transaction guarantees the settlement of the overlapping of licenses and authorizations with the TIM Group so asseeking to avoid potential sanctions and penalties to be imposed by Anatel. Pursuant toannul the Merger Agreement BTC will merge intoAgreement. We disclosed such arbitration in a material fact on March 16, 2006.

     On May 2, 2006, TIMINT and TIMB and we will receive shares in the resulting TIMB company, the size of such interestannounced their decision to be determined based on appraisals of relative value to be performed by an international investment banking firm hired by us. In addition TIMB will surrender its domestic and international long distance licenses to Anatel and enter into preferred provider arrangements and operational agreements with our company for those services as well as other telecommunications services and products of mutual interest, which will allow us to continue to offer convergence services to our clients. The completion ofterminate the Merger is subject toAgreement. In the fulfillment of certain conditions precedent, including our Board of Directorssame letter, TIMINT and Anatel prior approvals. Despite our attempt to resolve the regulatory issue of overlapping licensesTIMB reserved their alleged rights under sections 10.3 and authorizations (including those for national and international long distance services, as well as mobile services), certain indirect shareholders have filed judicial actions preventing the consummation11.1 of the Merger Agreement. The Merger is currently subject to various judicial injunctions (see below).

     Concurrently with the signing ofarbitration that we brought against the Merger Agreement the Solpart Agreement was amended to restore TII to the control block of Solpart Brasil Telecom Participações S.A., and our company. This was implemented by a second amendment to the Solpart Agreement restoring certain rights of TII and allowing TII to restore a 38% ownership position in Solpart. As of the date of the filing of this annual report, this restoration is also being contested by judicial proceedings.continues.

     As a result of entering into these various agreements, we agreed to settle existing disputes relating to TII's acts and omissions that caused material damages to our company. This agreement to settle is at the date of this annual report being contested judicially by certain indirect shareholders.

13


Table of Contents

LAWSUITS AND INJUNCTIONS AFFECTING OUR OPERATIONS

     There are currently lawsuits pending seeking to block the Merger Agreement. As of the date of this filing a preliminary injunction has been issued by the Court pending further hearings preventing implementation of the Merger or the accomplishment of any extraordinary managerial act, without prior consent of the Board of Directors and approval through a generalDisputes among controlling shareholders meeting. To similar effect we became aware that a preliminary injunction has been issued by the United States District Court, Southern District of New York preventing Opportunity Equity Partners, Ltd. and persons acting in concert with them from taking any action enforcing the Merger Agreement or the other agreements entered into at the same time or entering into any agreement or transaction outside the ordinary course of business involving any entity in which the CVC LP has a direct or indirect interest (this would include the Company).

     We are unable to predict the outcome of thesethe disputes whether the Merger will be accomplished while these actions are pending and whetherrelated to the overlap of licenses and whether such disputes will be resolved without the applicationissuance by Anatel of any sanctions or penalties. Our ability to offer national and international fixed-line services and/or mobile services in the same regions as TIM are at risk of being terminated by Anatel if the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement involving our wireless operations and the surrender by TIMB of long distance licenses are not allowed to be completed by July 18, 2005.

In addition, the disputes among the shareholders of Solpart, including with respect tothe dispute over the ownership structure of Solpart, and management

17


Table of Contents

of entities which hold a stake in Brasil Telecom Participações S.A. and Zain a company which integrates the controlling corporate structure of Brasil Telecom Participações S.A. and Brasil Telecom S.A may result in changes to our board and/or senior management.

Delays in payment or defaults of our clients for long periods may adversely affect our business.

     On March 31, 2006, we accounted losses related to accrued receivables in the amount of R$112.8 million, as a result of the default of subscribers, which correspond to 3.1% of our consolidated net earnings during the period ended on that date.

     Subscribers “in default” are those who fail to pay their bills within 30 days of their maturity date. Anatel requires us to render our services to all consumers, notwithstanding their credit history. Therefore, we may not select our subscribers or refuse to provide our services to certain subscribers, except if such subscriber has failed to pay past debts with us. High levels of default for long periods may adversely affect our business, our financial health and operational results.

Problems with billing, invoicing and collection services may adversely affect our earnings.

     On July 2003, users were given the option to use our code to complete calls from mobile handsets. By Resolution No. 343, dated as of July 17, 2003, Anatel established that carriers shall render invoicing and collection services to other carriers with which they had entered into traffic agreements. Upon the certification that we had achieved the then established universalization targets, we were authorized to complete long distance national and international calls. We have entered into agreements with several carriers to include on our telephone bills the long distance services rendered by such carriers, as well as the long distance services rendered by other collective interest carriers. Any problems with the execution of invoicing and collection services by other carriers may adversely affect our levels of bad debts.

Any reduction in the offer of products by suppliers may adversely affect us.

     We rely on several technology, equipment and services suppliers. Any difficulty in obtaining these products, due to, for example, a decrease in supply, excessive demand by global telecommunication players (causing product price pressure), discontinuity in the operations of one or more relevant suppliers (including bankruptcy or production problems), problems with the transfer or any other factor which affects the supplying of goods, may jeopardize either our expansion plans or the continuity of our services.

We sponsor employee social security plans and any changes in the regulations regarding mortality rates may require us to book additional provisions on our financial statements.

     The amount, frequency and duration of our contributions to employee social security employees plans is directly related to the mortality rate, which represents the average life span of employees, among other factors.

     Any change in these criteria may result in the need to contribute for longer periods in comparison to those initially provided. Consequently, we may be compelled to book additional provisions on our financial statements, which may adversely affect our results.

We may need to enter financing agreements with third parties in order to conclude potential strategic acquisitions carry on new transactions, effect regulatory investments, and maintain wireless and fixed telephone line plants.

     We may not be able to bear financing demands through funds arising out of ordinary cash flow and may need to enter into financing agreements with third parties in the future. Such financing may not be available to us in acceptable and competitive conditions or indeed in market conditions. If we are unable to obtain financings on terms favorable to us or at all, our transactions and operations may be materially and adversely affected.

18


Table of Contents

Problems with sophisticated information and processing systems may cause significant adverse effects on our financial status and operational results.

     Our sophisticated information and processing systems are vital for our growth and our ability to monitor costs, collect debts, detect frauds, provide services to consumers, reach operational efficiency and accomplish service targets, particularly in view of the increase in competition in our region. The updating and modernization of our systems may not be sufficient to avoid future flaws in each of these systems, which may have a significant adverse effect on our financial status and operational results.

We may be required to obtain certain environmental licenses or fines may be levied against us for the failure to obtain such licenses.

     In Brazil, environmental licenses are regulated specially by Resolution No. 237/97, enacted by the National Environmental Council (“CONAMA”). This resolution lists those activities that require an environmental license and also establishes compulsory licensing for certain activities which may produce significant potential environmental impacts.

     In Brazil, federal, state and local governments each have the authority to determine whether an activity may potentially result in significant environmental effects and, consequently, demand and award environmental permissions for the implementation of these activities. Our regular operations include the installation and maintenance of cables, wires and transmission antenna towers in our operating region. The installation and maintenance of cables, wires and transmission antenna towers are not referred to in CONAMA Resolution No. 237/97 as activities that require previous compulsory licenses. We cannot be assured, though, that a jurisdiction will not interpret installation and maintenance as activities that may potentially cause environmental impacts and therefore require us to obtain an environmental license for the implementation of these activities. If we are compelled to obtain environmental licenses in some jurisdictions and we fail to obtain these licenses, we may be subject to the imposition of fines, which may vary from R$500 to R$10 million, total or partial suspension of those activities, and/or civil and criminal sanctions. According to environmental crimes law (Law nº 9.605/98), the criteria for the imposition of fines include the degree of the violation, taking into account the motivation for the violation, the consequences for public health and for the environment, and the criminal precedents of the agent regarding the accomplishment of environmental law and its economic capacity. The imposition of fines or the compliance with these environmental regulations may have a significant adverse effect on our business or results of operations.

Risks RelatingRelated to the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry

We face increasing competition in all segments of the Brazilian telecommunications industry, and the telecommunications industry may not continue to grow or may grow at a slower rate.rate than in the past. This may have a material adverse effect on our market share, margins, results of operations and financial conditioncondition.

     The telecommunications industry in Brazil is becoming increasingly competitive. Our public-regime fixed-line concessions are not exclusive, and Anatel could grant additional private-regime authorizations in our region. Our fixed-line services are also subject to competition from wireless service providers, howeverproviders. However such competition is still limited by the fact that rates for wireless calls are currently much higher than rates for calls on our fixed-line network. We also face competition from wireless service providers in the low end of the market through the offer of prepaid plans by such wireless providers. To date, Telemar Norte Leste S.A. ("Telemar"), Empresa Brasileira de Telecomunicações S.A. ("Embratel"), Intelig Telecomunicações Ltda ("Intelig"), Telecomunicações de São Paulo S.A. ("Telesp"), Global Village Telecom ("GVT"), Telmex do Brasil Ltda ("Telmex"), Fonet Brasil Ltda ("Fonet"), and Novação Telecomunicações Ltda ("Novação") have been granted permission by Anatel to provide local fixed telecommunications services in the totality of our Region.

     Additionally, to date, TNL PCS S.A. ("Oi"), Embratel, Intelig, Telesp, GVT, Albra Telecomunicações Ltda ("Albra"), TIM Celular S.A. ("TIM"TIM Cellular"), and Easytone Telecomunicações Ltda ("Easytone") have been granted permission by Anatel to provide long distance telecommunications services in the totality of our Region. The certification of other service providers' compliance with universalization and expansion targets permits other service providers to operate in our region. Now we also have to compete in our region against competitors from outside of our region that offer fixed-line, mobile, data local and/or long distance telecommunications services throughout Brazil. Increased competition could have a material adverse effect on our market share, margins, results of operations and financial condition. Since

19


Table of Contents

January 2004, we have developed the ability to counteract losses in our market share in the local fixed-line market by providing interregional and international long-distance telecommunications services in other regions.services.

     In September 2004, we commenced offering our wireless services. Wireless services are equally competitive and we face competition in Region II from (i) a joint venture between Telefônica and Portugal Telecom (marketing(marketed under the brand name "Vivo"), (ii) Telmex, which competes against us in our region through América Móviles (marketing(marketed under the brand name "Claro"), (iii) TIM Cellular, (iv) Sercomtel Celular, and (v) CTBC Celular. Competition for wireless telecommunications customers may require us to increase our costs and marketing expenses or provide services at lower rates than those we currently expect to charge for such services. If we are able to complete the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, then we will not be offering wireless services directly but will participate in this business through the acquisition of an equity interest in TIMB, which as of April 28, 2005, had approximately 14.6 million wireless users. The Merger Agreement also contemplates operational agreements through which we will be able to continue to offer convergence services.

14


Table of Contents

Competition in data transmission services is not subject to regulatory restriction.restrictions. The market is open to a great number of competitors. Increased competition in data trasnsmissiontransmission services may require us to reduce the rates we charge for data transmission services.

     In addition, the Brazilian telecommunications industry is consolidating, which results in larger competitors with greater resources. There can be no assurance that increased competition in all segments of the Brazilian telecommunications industry will not have a material adverse effect on our market share, margins, results of operations and financial condition.

     Our ability to continue to compete successfully will depend on the success of our marketing, financial and other resources (including our access to capital) in comparison to our competitors and on our ability to anticipate and respond to competitive factors affecting the industry, including the introduction of new services, changes in consumer preferences, changes in regulation, demographic trends, economic conditions, discount pricing strategies by competitors as well as further industry consolidation. Currently, we compete with our competitors primarily on the basis of features, pricing and customer service. However, we cannot predict exactly which factors in the future will be important in maintaining our competitive position, such as the increasing need to offer promotions, discounts and other marketing initiatives, or what expenditures will be required to develop and provide the necessary technologies, products and services to remain competitive. ThisAn inability to compete in any of these factors may adversely affect our market share, margins, results of operations and financial condition.

     In addition, we may also face increased competition due to unbundling regulations. On May 13, 2004, Anatel issued Order (Despacho) 172, which establishes rules for partial ("lineunbundling of local telephone networks, which we refer to as "line sharing"), and full unbundling of local telephone networks, and requires us to make our networks available to other telecommunications service providers. This legislation limits the rate we can charge for line sharing per line for broadband speeds of up to 512kbps.512 kbps. Additional charges, such as co-location charges, are applied over the line sharing base price, increasing the total cost of the unbundled line. Anatel has not yet fixed rates for full unbundling, although we expect that these rates will be lower than the rates we currently are permitted to charge. This regulation was designed to increase competition in the local fixed-line and broadband internet access markets by making it easier for new telephone companies operating under either the public or private regime to enter these markets and for existing providers to provide new services or enter new regions, since the networks of all telecommunications service providers, including fixed-line operators such as us, will be made available at lower rates. Similarly, this legislation makes it easier for us to provide new services and enter into new regions in competition with other operators. However, operational rules for the implementation of unbundling have not yet been agreed to among Brazilian telecommunications operators. These regulations are recent, and as of December 31, 2004,2005 no unbundled lines had been used by competitors in our region. We cannot assure that we can compete without suffering an adverse impact on market share, margins, and results of operations or financial condition based on the implementation of unbundling.

     Moreover, cable television services companies offer telecommunication services, and there are other alternatives to render telecommunication services, such as satellite transmission and VoIP. Another example is the conversion of fixed-line telephone users to wireless telephone users. These changes may lead to the migration of some of our subscribers, resulting in a reduction in earnings, which may adversely affect our company.

     Any economic, technological or other developments resulting in a slowdown in growth or a reduction in demand for our fixed-line or other services may harm our business and revenues. To remain competitive we must diversify further our services, and there can be no assurance that we will be successful in doing so.

20


Table of Contents

We depend on other telecommunications services providers. We may not be able to enter into favorable interconnection and unbundling agreementsagreements.

     In order to receive or send calls from or to customers of other fixed-line and wireless Brazilian networks and international networks, we must interconnect with the networks of our competitors. The Brazilian General Telecommunications Law requires all telecommunications service providers to interconnect their networks with those of other providers on a non-discriminatory basis. The rates to be paid by one fixed-line network operator to the other for the use of each other's fixed-line network are currently regulated by Anatel.

     The current interconnection model is asymmetric, with higher rates in effect for mobile interconnection than fixed-line interconnection. As a result, mobile operators generally retain more than 80% of net revenues from fixed-to-mobile calls, while fixed-line carriers, like us, usually offer this service incurring negative margins. In light of such imbalance, Anatel established that from July 2004 on, interconnection rates for wireless networks (the VU-M) would be freely negotiated. Nevertheless,The companies agreed to establish a provisional readjustment and submit the Brazilian network operators havefinal decision to Anatel’s arbitrage under the telecommunication sector legislation. We can not been fully successful in negotiating and reaching acceptableassume that Anatel’s arbitrage regarding the interconnection agreements; if telecommunications companies cannot agree on

15


Table of Contents

interconnection rates and conditions, Anatel may, by mediation, arbitration or intervention, establish the terms of such interconnection agreements. Ourtariffs will be favorable to us. If Anatel’s decision is unfavorable to us, our operating and financial results may be adversely affected in case we are not able to negotiate favorable interconnection agreements.affected.

The failure to implement the technology necessary to assess and combat fraud on our network could adversely affect our results of operationsoperations.

     The fraudulent use of telecommunications networks imposes a significant cost upon service providers, who must bear the cost of services provided to fraudulent users. We suffer loss of revenue as a result of fraudulent use, and also cash costs due to our obligation to reimburse carriers for the cost of services provided to fraudulent users. During 2004, we installed a Fraud Management System to detect and prevent fraud. In addition to thea system to monitor customers' usage based on their traffic behavior, we implemented a system to keep subscribers under close surveillance. The fraud system is based on a signaling network and has an interface to the call-blocking platform in order to limit revenue loss once fraudulent use has been identified. We cannot guarantee that our Fraud Management System will effectively detect and prevent fraud.

     In addition, there can be no assurance that all operators with which our network is interconnected have appropriate anti-fraud treatment in their networks. In 2001, we created a fraud management department to provide specialized customer service to customers affected by fraud. During the fiscal year 2002, several automated procedures were created and placed in various parts of our operations to detect and control possible abnormalities that could represent fraudulent activities. These controls have a preventive function, and work both pro-actively and, should a fraud occur, reactively. In 2003, we implemented controls to capture fraud events automatically, such as a non-billing mechanism for fraud-blocked terminals, a cut-off limit system for service usage, and a webpage to gather any fraud claimclaims from the community. At the end of 2003, we created the IT Revenue Assurance Group, which develops systems to assist the revenue assurance department in fraud combating. During 2004, the Group implemented a significant number of applications to monitor and detect fraud in different areas including public telephony,telephone, bad debt, revenue chain, key performance indicators and others. These actions achieved a better level of control and mitigated the risk of loss from fraud as compared to previous years. The levels of accuracyWe cannot guarantee that these fraud control measures will continue to be accurate and effectiveness of these procedures have reachedeffective to reach the desired and expected performance forlevel of fraud control. Notwithstanding, weWe continue to deploy and implement the technology necessary to assess the accuracy and effectiveness of our fraud combative procedures. Should we not be able to correctly quantify and combat fraud on our network, our results of operations could be adversely affected.

     In September 2004, Anatel issued Order (Ofício) 603, which established that fraudulent calls should not be considered for purposes of payment of interconnection rates.

Developments in the global telecommunications industry and technology are difficult to predict, and a failure by us to respond to such developments may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operationsoperations.

     All companies in the global telecommunications industry must adapt to rapid and significant changes in technology that are often difficult to anticipate. While we have been upgrading our network with technologically advanced fiber optic cable with a microwave overlay, it is possible that our network will be challenged by competition from improved or new technologies in the future. Technological changes may adversely affect our competitive position, require substantial new capital expenditures and/or require write-offs of obsolete technology.

21


Table of Contents

If we fail to implement technological advances, we may be unable to continue to compete in the global telecommunications industry.

     The mobile telephone sector, in particular, requires considerable technological developments, constant capacity, quality and digital technology data transmission speed improvements, shorter development periods of new cycles and changes due to users' needs and preferences. New technologies, superior to the ones used by BrT GSM may be developed. Furthermore, it is expected that Anatel will promote 3G (Third Generation) mobile telephone auctions in the near future, which will allow eventual buyers of such licenses to adopt technological platforms which allow the offer of more advanced mobile telephone services than those allowed by our current mobile platform. Thus, it cannot be assured that we will remain competitive due to the adoption, in due time, of the new technologies, as they are developed.

In the event of a natural disaster, war, significant public disturbance or for economic reasons, the Brazilian government could temporarily seize or permanently expropriate our assets, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operationsoperations.

     The Brazilian government has the authority to temporarily seize all assets related to telecommunications concessions in the event of natural disaster, war, significant public disturbance, threats to internal peace, or for economic reasons and other reasons related to national security. In addition, the Brazilian government has the statutory right to permanently expropriate any telecommunications concession and claim any related assets for reasons of public interest. Brazilian law provides for compensation in connection with losses and damages related to temporary seizure or expropriation. However, in the event of a temporary seizure or expropriation of any of our

16


Table of Contents

assets there can be no assurance that the actual compensation paid would be adequate or that such payment would be timely. ThisAn inadequate or untimely payment would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Restructuring of Governmental Regulatory Agencies may adversely affect the transactions of our company.

     A bill of law subject to the approval of National Congress provides for the administration, organization and social controlling of Governmental Regulatory Agencies, such as Anatel. The purpose of this bill of law is to change the structure, functioning and competence of those agencies, by, among other measures: (i) implementing administration agreements to be entered into by and between the agencies and the correspondent related ministries; (ii) creating public hearings on the agencies, with the purpose of controlling the services rendered and monitoring the internal process of adjudication of accusations and complaints by citizens, either against the agencies’ activities or the entities subject to their control; (iii) changing the mandates of managers, including presidents and directors, to four years; and (iv) transferring the authority to award concession licenses for rendering public services to ministries, leaving for the agencies the task of regulating, inspecting, monitoring bid proceedings and awarding authorizations for the operation of services under private-regime.

     Considering the level of political influence over the ministries, the agencies may be subject to further instability in their administration, which may trigger unexpected changes on regulation and policies affecting public services concessionary companies, such as our company. We cannot foresee the impact of the approval of the referred bill of law on our transactions and our competitive position.

The failure to accomplish Anatel’s targets may result in the imposition of sanctions and penalties on our company.

     We are required to accomplish targets established by the Federal Government and Anatel. Due to the public nature of the services rendered by our company, according to the terms of the Concession Contracts and of the applicable regulation, we must cover a geographic area and comply with targets on the execution of the services rendered.

     In this regard, the PGMU and the PGMQ also provide for targets that we must achieve. Potential consequences of our failure to comply with such targets include the imposition of fines and/or other penalties and

22


Table of Contents

the termination of our concession contract, which may cause significant financial loss to business, financial condition and results of operations.

Risks RelatingRelated to Operations in Brazil

Brazilian political and economic conditions have a direct impact on our business and the market price of the Preferred Shares underlying the ADSsour ADSs.

     Substantially all of our operations and customers are located in Brazil. Accordingly, our financial condition and results of operations are substantially dependent on Brazil's economy, which has been characterized by frequent and occasionally drastic intervention by the Brazilian government and volatile economic cycles in the past.

     The Central Bank reduced the base interest rate (“SELIC”) from 17.75% in December 2004 to 15.75% in April 2006. Facing the economic, political and inflation indicators during 2005, the Central Bank increased the SELIC to 19.75% between June and September 2005. In 2002, as a reaction to political and economic uncertainties, the global economic downturn, the crisis in Argentina and the Brazilian presidential elections, the dollar appreciated by 52.3% against thereal to R$3.5333 per US$1.00 at December 31, 2002. Thereal recovered in 2003, appreciating by 18.2% to R$2.8892 per US$1.00, at December 31, 2003. In 2004, therealappreciated in value by 8.1% in relation toagainst the U.S. dollar, from R$2.8892 per U.S. dollar on December 31, 2003 toquoted at R$2.6544 per U.S. dollarUS$1.00 on December 31, 2004. In 2004,2005, the Central Bank raised Brazil's base interest ratereal appreciated by a total of 1.25 percentage points13.4% against the dollar, quoted at R$2.3407 per US$1.00 on December 31, 2005. We cannot guarantee that thereal will not substantially devalue again in an effort to stabilize the currency and decrease inflationary pressures.future.

     In the past, the Brazilian government has often changed monetary, fiscal, taxation and other policies to influence the course of Brazil's economy. We have no control over and cannot predict what measures or policies the Brazilian government may take in response to the current Brazilian economic situation or how Brazilian government intervention and government policies will affect the Brazilian economy and, both directly and indirectly, our operations and revenues.

     Our operations, financial condition and the market price of our Preferred Shares and ADSs may be adversely affected by changes in policy involving exchange controls, tax and other matters, as well as factors such as:

  • fluctuations in exchange rates;
  • base interest rate fluctuations;
  • fiscal and taxation legislation changes;
  • inflation; and
  • other political, diplomatic, social and economic developments within and outside Brazil that affect the country.

     The Brazilian government may impose restrictions on capital outflow that would hinder or prevent the custodian in Brazil, or non-Brazilian holders who have exchanged ADSs for the underlying Preferred Shares, from converting the proceeds relating to the Preferred Shares into U.S. dollars and remitting those proceeds abroad. Brazilian law permits the government to impose these restrictions whenever there is a serious imbalance in Brazil's balance of payments or reasons to foresee such a serious imbalance. Although there is no current material imbalance in Brazil's balance of payments, there can be no assurance that such an imbalance will not arise in the future or that the Brazilian government will not institute more restrictive exchange control policies in the future. See Item 10 "Additional Information–Taxation–Brazilian Tax Considerations."

     On January 1, 2003, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva from the Labor Party took office as the new President of Brazil. Until now, the economic policies of former President Fernando Henrique Cardoso have been continued by the current administration of the Brazilian government. Although the new government has not departed significantly from previousthe economic policies andof the former administration, theRealreal appreciated 8.1%13.4% against the U.S. dollar during 2004,2005 and concerns remain about the future policies of the Brazilian government. While the current administration's policies have to date have not been adverse to the telecommunications industry, the uncertainty over what policies the current Brazilian government may propose or adopt in the future may have an impact on our business andeconomic policies of the Brazilian government may contribute to economic uncertainty in Brazil and to heightened volatility in the Brazilian international securities markets, and thuswhich may have an impacta material adverse effect on our business.business and results of operations.

17     Additionally the Presidential Election is expected to occur in October 2006 in Brazil. The President of Brazil has considerable power to change the future economic policies of the Brazilian government. The election may change government political policies and the elected administration may implement new policies. We cannot

23


Table of Contents

predict what policies will be adopted and we cannot predict their effect on the economy, our business or our results of operations.

If Brazil experiences substantial inflation in the future, our revenues and the market price of the Preferred Shares and ADSs may be reducedreduced.

     Brazil has in the past experienced extremely high rates of inflation, with annual rates of inflation reaching as high as 2,489.1% in 1993 (according to the Brazilian National Consumer Price Index (Í¥ndice Nacional de Preços ao Consumidor) published by the IBGE)Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (“IBGE”). Inflation itself and governmental measures to combat inflation have both in the past had significant negative effects on the Brazilian economy. Inflation, actionsIn 1994 the Brazilian Government introduced thePlano Real(“Real Plan”) with the objective of reducing inflation and building a base to sustainable economic growth.

     Since the introduction of Plano Real, inflation has remained at stable levels, substantially below prior periods. However recent international events like the emerging markets crisis, the US terrorist attacks, and the subsequent military conflicts, have caused and may continue to cause destabilization in international markets. These events may affect the Brazilian economy in the form of fluctuations in the exchange rate between the US dollar and the Plano Real, interest rate increases, oil price increases, and, consequently, increases in the rate of inflation.

     In 2003, the inflation rate measured by the Extensive Consumer Price Index (“IPCA”) was 9.3% above the established initial target of 4% with 2 percentage points of tolerance above and below the target. In 2004 the established target was 5.5% with 2.5 percentage points of tolerance above and below the target. For 2005 and 2006 the established target was/is 4.5% with 2.5 percentage points of tolerance. The measured inflation by IPCA in 2005 was 5.7% and until March 31, 2006 the cumulative inflation was 1.4%.

     Actions taken to combat inflation and public speculation about possible future actions have also contributed to economic uncertainty in Brazil and to heightened volatility in the Brazilian securities markets. If Brazil experiences substantial inflation in the future, our costs may increase, and our gross profit may be affected to the extent that our rate increases and our net operating revenues do not keep up with the rate of inflation. Additionally, our service debt and the cost of new financial funding may increase. We cannot predict the effect that an inflation increase would have on our financial condition, our capacity, our cash generation, or our operational results.

Devaluation of the real may lead to substantial losses on our liabilities denominated in or indexed to foreign currencies and a reduction in our revenuesrevenues.

     TheDuring the last four decades, the Brazilian Central Bank has periodically devalued the Brazilian currency during the last four decades.currency. The exchange rate between thereal and the U.S. dollar has varied significantly in recent years. For example, thereal/U.S. dollar exchange rate fell from R$1.9554 per U.S. dollar at December 31, 2000 to R$3.5333 at December 31, 2002. In 2003, thereal has strengthened against the U.S. dollar. At December 31, 2003 thereal/U.S. dollar exchange rate wasappreciated in value by 18.1% to R$2.8892 per U.S. dollar. In 2004 thereal appreciated in value by 8.1% in relation to the U.S. dollar to R$2.6544 per U.S.dollar. In 2005 thereal appreciated in value by 13.4% to R$2.3407 per dollar.

     A significant amount of our financial assets and liabilities are denominated in or indexed to foreign currencies, primarily U.S. dollars. As of December 31, 2005, R$1,064.1 million or 21.7% of our financial indebtedness was denominated in a foreign currency. When the Brazilian currency is devalued, we incur losses on our liabilities denominated in or indexed to foreign currencies, such as our U.S. dollar-denominated long-term debt and foreign currency loans, and experience gains on our monetary assets denominated in or indexed to foreign currencies, as the liabilities and assets are translated intoreais. If devaluation occurs when the value of such liabilities significantly exceeds the value of such assets, including any financial instruments entered into for hedging purposes, we could incur significant reduction in our revenues, even if their value has not changed in their original currency.This could adversely affect our ability to meet certain of our payment obligations. A failure to meet certain of our payment obligations could trigger a default in certain financial covenants in our loan and credit facilities, which would have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

We are subject to delays and delinquency on our accounts receivablereceivable.

24


Table of Contents

           Our business is affected by customers' ability to pay their bills. If the Brazilian economy worsens because of, among other factors:

  • the level of economic activity;
  • inflation;
  • devaluation of thereal; or
  • an increase in domestic interest rates,

a greater portion of our customers may not be able to pay their bills, which would increase our bad debts and provisions for doubtful accounts. Strict regulation from Anatel prevents us from implementing certain policies that could have the effect of reducing delinquency, such as service restrictions or limitations on the types of services provided based on a subscriber's credit record. Losses from accounts receivable reached R$410.3449.3 million in 2005, against R$411.3 million in 2004 againstand R$298.0 million in 2003, increasing in percentage of gross revenues terms, from 2.7% in 2003 to 3.2% in 2004.2004 and 3.1% in 2005. However, if economic conditions worsen in Brazil or if we are unable to implement policies to limit subscriber delinquencies or otherwise select our customers, persistent subscriber delinquencies and bad debt can adversely affect our financial results. See "Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates—Provision for Doubtful Accounts."

18


Table of Contents

Any increase in taxes levied on the telecommunications sector in connection with tax reforms expected to be implemented in the future could affect the results of our operations. Tax reform will be gradually implemented in the following years.

     Increases in Brazil's already high level of taxation could adversely affect our profitability. Increases in taxes for the telecommunications sector usually result in higher tariffs for our customers. High tariff levels generally result in lower levels of usage of our services and, therefore, lower net sales. Lower net sales result in lower margins because a significant portion of our costs are fixed and thus do not vary substantially based on the level of usage of our network or our services. ThereAlthough mobile and fixed services are equally taxed, there can be no assurance that the Brazilian government will not increase current tax levels, at state and/or federal levels, and that this will not adversely impact our business.

     In December 2003, the Federal Senate approved part of thea tax reform bill, that had been under discussion for eight months. Thethe text approved by the Senateof which was consolidated in Constitutional Amendment 42, enacted on December 19, 2003. Constitutional Amendment 42 is already in force, and provides for an extension on the assessment of the Provisional Contribution of Financial Transfers (Contribuição Provisória sobre Movimentação Financeira - "CPMF"), the assessment ofPrograma de Integração Social("PIS"); andContribuição para Financiamento da Seguridade Social("COFINS") taxes on import transactions, and the assessment of COFINS under a non-cumulative regime. Certain issues that were under discussion in 2003, related to taxes on the commercialization of goods and rendering of services, were not included in Constitutional Amendment 42 and may be discussed again in 2007.

     Some important issues originally provided for in the tax reform bill relate to: (i) harmonization of ICMS tax rules, which would be governed by a single federal legislation applicable to all states; (ii) equalization of ICMS rates; and (iii) limitations on granting tax incentives. If approved, such measures shallwill be gradually adopted in 20052007. Additionally, the Federal Senate has discussed the merger of the ICMS and 2007. The delayIPI into a single federal tax assessed upon the commercialization of goods and rendering of interstate and intermunicipal transportation and communication services. We cannot guarantee that, if the merger of the ICMS and IPI is accomplished, certain tax incentives granted to us in the approvalpast will continue to be granted, and implementationcannot determine the effect that a cessation of thesuch tax reforms billincentives may negatively affect the Brazilian economy and capital markets. For a further discussion of the impact of taxationhave on our business, seeresults of operations. See "Item 10. Additional Information—Taxation."

The proposedProposed changes in Brazilian labor law may affect our labor relationsrelations.

     In April 2003, the Lower House reopened the discussions regarding the changes in the Brazilian Labor Law(Consolidação das Leis do Trabalho,or CLT). A further revision of union relations in Brazil is also being discussed. It is not clear whether the proposed changes, if approved by the Congress, would impact our businessunder discussion in the future.Lower House. Although the progress of these proposed modifications has slowed during the last

25


Table of Contents

year as political forces have showed some resistance, we cannot predict the effect on any such modifications on our labor relations, which could have a negative effect on our business.

It may be difficult to effect service of process upon, or to enforce foreign judgments upon us, our directors and our officersofficers.

     We are organized under the laws of Brazil, and all of our directors and officers reside outside the United States. In addition, a substantial portion of our assets, and most or all of the assets of our directors and officers, are located in Brazil. As a result, it may be difficult for an ADS holder to effect service of process within the United States or other jurisdictions outside of Brazil upon our companyus or such persons, or to enforce against them judgmentspersons. In addition, because substantially all of courtsour assets and all of our directors and officers reside outside the United States, and judgment obtained in the United States predicated upon the civil liability provisionsagainst us or any of the federal securitiesour directors or other laws ofofficers may not be collectible within the United States. There is a doubt as to the enforceability of civil liabilities under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended the (“Securities Act”) or the U.S. Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) pursuant to original actions instituted in Brazil.

Risks Associated withRelated to Our Preferred Shares orand American Depositary Shares

Holding Preferred Shares inOur ADS formholders may subjectnot have the holder to several risks and may jeopardize certainsame rights relatingwith respect to voting, dividends, and distributions, and preemptive rights, among others, that suchmay expose our ADS holders to greater risk than holders of our Preferred Shares.

     Our ADS holder would otherwise enjoymay not have the same voting rights as a holderholders of our Preferred Shares

19


Table of Contents

26


Table of Contents

Holder of ADSs may have fewer and less well-defined shareholders' rights than in the United StatesStates.

     Our corporate affairs are governed by our Bylaws and Brazilian Corporation Law, which may differ from the legal principles that would apply if we were incorporated in a jurisdiction in the United States. Under Brazilian Corporation Law, the holders of our Preferred Shares and our ADSs may have fewer and less well definedwell-defined rights to protect their interests relative to actions taken by our board of directors or the holders of our Common Shares than under the laws of other jurisdictions outside Brazil.

     Restrictions on insider trading and price manipulation, rules and policies against self-dealing and regarding the preservation of shareholder interests may not be as detailed, well-established and enforced in Brazil as in the United States, which may potentially disadvantagingdisadvantage the holders of our Preferred Shares and/or ADSs. For example, when compared to Delaware corporation law, Brazilian Corporation Law and practice has less detailed and well-established rules, and fewer judicial precedents relating to the review of management decisions involving duty of care and duty of loyalty standards in the context of corporate restructurings, transactions with related parties and sale-of-business transactions. In addition, shareholders in Brazilian companies must hold at least 5.0% of the outstanding share capital of a corporation in order to have standing to bring shareholders' derivative suits, andsuits. Furthermore, shareholders in Brazilian companies ordinarily do not have standing to bring class action suits.

The relative volatility and illiquidity of the Brazilian securities markets may substantially limit an ADS holder's ability to sell the Preferred Shares underlying the ADSs at the price and time desireddesired.

     Brazilian investments, such as investments in our securities, are subject to economic and political risks that may affect the ability of investors to receive payment, in whole or in part, in respect of their investments, including, among others:

20


Table of Contents


     that may affect the ability of investors to receive payment, in whole or in part, in respect of their investments.

     The Brazilian securities markets are substantially smaller, less liquid, more concentrated and more volatile than major U.S. and European securities markets, and are not as highly regulated or supervised as thesethose markets. TheAs a consequence, the trading volume of our ADSs has traditionally been relatively small capitalizationlow. Even if the trading volume of our ADSs increases, we can give no assurance that it will be maintained or will result in a desirable stock price. As a result of this relatively low trading volume, it may be difficult to identify buyers to whom our ADS holders can sell their ADSs, and the illiquidityability of the Brazilian equity markets may substantially limit anour ADS holder's abilityholders to sell the Preferred Shares underlying the ADSs.ADSs may be substantially limited. Furthermore, the trading price of our ADSs representing Preferred Shares is likely to be highly volatile and subject to wide fluctuations in price in response to various factors, many of which are beyond our control.

Developments in other countries may affect the Brazilian economy and the market price of theour Preferred Shares and the ADSsour ADSs.

     The securities of Brazilian issuers have been influenced by economic and market conditions in other countries, especially other emerging market countries. Since the end of 1997, and in particular during 2001 and 2002, the international financial markets have experienced significant volatility as a result of economic problems in various emerging market countries. Investors subsequently have had a heightened risk perception for investments in such markets. As a result, in some periods, Brazil has experienced a significant outflow of U.S. dollars and Brazilian companies have faced higher costs for raising funds, both domestically and abroad and have been impeded from accessing international capital markets. We cannot assure investors that international capital markets will remain open to Brazilian companies, including Brasil Telecom,our company, or that prevailing interest rates in these markets will be advantageous to us and our abilityor that we will be able to obtain additional financing on acceptable terms or at all. As a consequence, the market value of our securities may be adversely affected by these or other events outside of Brazil. See Item 9 "The“Item 9. The Offer and Listing—Listing — Offer and Listing Details." There can be no assurances that future events elsewhere, especially in emerging market countries, will not have an adverse effect on the market value of our Preferred Shares and our ADSs.

27


Table of Contents

Changes in Brazilian tax laws may have an impact on the taxes applicable to the disposition of the ADSsADSs.

     According to Law 10,833, enacted on December 29, 2003, capital gains earned by a non-Brazilian resident upon the dispositionsale of assets located in Brazil by non-residents of Brazil, whether to other non-residents of Brazila Brazilian resident or Brazilian residents and whether made within or outside Brazil isto another non-Brazilian resident are subject to taxation in Brazil.Brazilian withholding tax. Considering the general and unclear scope of Law 10,833 and the absence of judicial guidance in respect thereof, we are unable tocannot predict how the exact scope of Law 10,833 would be interpreted inor the courtseffect that Law 10,833 will have on holders of Brazil.our ADSs or Preferred Shares.

ITEM 4. Information on the CompanyINFORMATION ON THE COMPANY

History and Development of the Company


     Brasil Telecom S.A. is a corporation organized under the laws of the Federative Republic of Brazil. We are one of the fixed-line telecommunications companies that resulted from the breakup and privatization of Telebrás by the Brazilian Federal Government in 1998. We are an amalgamation of the following operating companies formerly controlled byTelebrás: Telecomunicações de Santa Catarina S.A. – Telesc ("Telesc"),Telecomunicações de Goiás S.A. – Telegoiás ("Telegoiás"),Telecomunicações de Brasília S.A. – Telebrasília ("Telebrasília"),Telecomunicações do Mato Grosso S.A. – Telemat ("Telemat"),Telecomunicações do Mato Grosso do Sul S.A. – Telems ("Telems"),Telecomunicações de Rondônia S.A. – Teleron ("Teleron"),Telecomunicações do Acre S.A. – Teleacre ("Teleacre"),Companhia Telefônica Melhoramento e Resistência – CTMR ("CTMR"), and our predecessor,Telecomunicações do Paraná S.A. – Telepar ("Telepar") and CRT, a company formerly controlledacquired by us from Telefônica S.A. and acquired by us in July 2000.

     Our principal executive office is located at SIA/Sul, ASP, Lote D, Bloco B – 71215-000 –Setor de Indústria e Abastecimento, Brasília, DF, Brazil, and our telephone number is (55-61) 415-1140.3415-1140. Our agent in the United States is CT Corporation System, located at 111 Eighth Avenue, 13th floor, New York, New York 10011.

Historical Background


     Prior to the incorporation of Telebrás in 1972, there were more than 900 telecommunications companies operating throughout Brazil. Between 1972 and 1975, Telebrás acquired almost all of the other telephone companies

21


Table of Contents

in Brazil and thus came to have a monopoly over the provision of public telecommunications services in almost all areas of the country. Beginning in 1995, the Federal Government undertook a comprehensive reform of Brazil's telecommunications regulatory system. In July 1997, Brazil's National Congress approved theLei Geral deTelecomunicações (the "General Telecommunications Law," and together with the regulations, decrees, orders and plans on telecommunications issued by Brazil's Executive Branch, the "Telecommunications Regulations"), which provided for the establishment of a new regulatory framework, the introduction of competition and the privatization of Telebrás.

     The General Telecommunications Law established Anatel as the regulator of the telecommunications industry in Brazil. Anatel is administratively independent from the Brazilian Government and financially autonomous. Anatel is required to report on its activities to the Ministry of Communications and to the Brazilian Congress on an annual basis. In addition, any proposed regulation of Anatel is subject to a period of public comment, including public hearings. Anatel's decisions may be challenged in the Brazilian courts. Among its functions are the following:

28


Table of Contents

     On January 30, 1998, in preparation for the restructuring and privatization of Telebrás, the cellular telecommunications operations of Telebrás' operating subsidiaries were spun off into separate companies. On May 22, 1998, Telebrás was restructured to form, in addition to Telebrás, 12 new holding companies by means of a procedure under Brazilian Corporation Law calledcisão, or split-up.“split-up.” These new holding companies were allocated virtually all the assets and liabilities of Telebrás, including the shares held by Telebrás in its operating companies. The split-up of Telebrás into 12 new holding companies is referred to herein as the "breakup of Telebrás."

     These holding companies, together with their respective subsidiaries, consisted of (i) eight cellular service providers, each operating in one of the regions into which Brazil has been divided for purposes of cellular telecommunications services in the frequency range formerly used by each of the former operating companies of Telebrás, (ii) three regional fixed-line service providers, each providing local and intraregionalandintra-state long-distance service in one of the three regions into which Brazil has been divided for purposes of fixed-line telecommunications, and (iii) Embratel, which providesproviding domestic (including intraregional and interregional) long-distance telephone service and international telephone service throughout Brazil.

     Set forth below are maps of Brazil showing the locations of the fixed-line, long-distance regions and cellular regions into which the country was split-up following the breakup of Telebrás:


2229





     Brasil Telecom Participações S.A.(previouslyformerly known as Tele Centro Sul Participações S.A.), is our parent company, and is one of the three holding companies providing local, interregional and international long-distance telecommunications services in Brazil. See Item“Item 7 "MajorMajor Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—Major Shareholders." In the breakup of Telebrás, Brasil Telecom Participações S.A. was allocated all the share capital held by Telebrás in Telesc, Telegoiás, Telebrasília, Telemat, Telems, Teleron, Teleacre, CTMR and Telepar, our predecessor; companies which provided fixed-line telecommunications service in the northern, western, central and southern regions of Brazil. See "—Business Overview—Our Region." In July 1998, the Federal Government sold all of its voting shares ofin these holding companies, including the shares it held in Brasil Telecom Participações S.A., to private sector buyers. The sale of all

23


Table of Contents

of the Federal Government's voting shares in the holding companies to private sector buyers is referred to herein as the "privatization of Telebrás." As a result of the merger of Telepar, Telesc, Telegoiás, Telebrasília, Telemat, Telems, Teleron, Teleacre, CTMR and CRT, ultimately turning into Brasil Telecom S.A., we became the leading local and intraregional fixed-line telecommunications service provider in our region. The onlyprincipal other relevant fixed-line telecommunications service provider in our region is Global Village Telecom (Sercomtel and CTBC also operate partially in our region but we do not service the same cities). For intraregional long-distance telecommunications services, Intelig and Embratel, among others, are providers that are authorized to provide long-distance services in our region.

     The other major telecommunications operators which were created as a result of the privatization of Telebrás are: Telemar which is our mirror telecommunications service provider in Region I, Telesp which is our mirror telecommunications service provider in Region III, and, Embratel which provides domestic and international long-distance service throughout Brazil. Brasil Telecom, Telemar, Telesp and Embratel all operate pursuant to public concessions granted by Anatel.

     Since the privatization of Telebrás, Anatel has continued to implement regulations which further its policy of promotingin order to promote competition and quality of service in the Brazilian telecommunications market place.marketplace. As part of this policy initiative, Anatel has allowed new private competitors into the Brazilian market to compete directly against us. In addition, Anatel has required us and the other public concession service providers to meet certain quality and universalization

30


Table of Contents

targets before we could compete in other service providers' market areas. On January 19, 2004, we received certification by Anatel that we havehad accomplished our universalization targets. Accordingly,targets, and accordingly we are now authorized to offer local fixed and domestic and international long-distance telephone services originated inside or outside our region as well as mobile services in our region. The certification of other service providers' compliance with universalization and expansion targets permits other service providers, including Telemar, Telesp and Embratel, to operate in our region. Any other service provider can get Anatel’s authorization to provide service and compete with us. We cannot, however, confirm the identity of the service providers that will be so authorized, the timing of such authorizations, or the extent of the authorized services, should any service providers be so authorized.

History of Our Company

The following bullet points briefly illustrate the history of our company:history:

24


Table of Contents

31


Table of Contents

25


Table of Contents

32


Table of our subsidiary through which we provide wireless services. TIMB agreed to surrender their overlapping long distance licenses and to use us as a preferred provider for national and international long distance services as well as for other telecommunications services and products. TII returned to our control group. (See “Risk Factors - Risks Relating to Our Company” for a discussion of current obstacles to these transactions.)Contents

Organizational structure

     We are structured as a consolidated operational company, inand currently have five subsidiaries through which we conduct substantially all of our operations, and currently have four subsidiaries,operations: BrT Serviços de Internet S.A., 14 Brasil Telecom Celular S.A.,GSM, VantTelecomunicações S.A. and, MTH Ventures do Brasil Ltda., and Brasil Telecom Comunicação Multimidia.

     At the Brasil Telecom S.A. level, we are subdivided into eleven operational branches,branches: Tocantins, Goiás, Acre, Rondônia, Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso do Sul, Paraná, Santa Catarina, Rio Grande do Sul, Pelotas and the Federal District. For information on our shareholding structure, please see Item 7 "Major“Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions – Major Shareholders."

     The following chart sets forth a summary of our organizational structure, including the percentage of total capital held in each of our significant subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004.2005. All of our significant subsidiaries are organized and existing under the laws of the Federative Republic of Brazil, except for Brasil Telecom Subsea Cable Systems (Bermuda) Ltd., which is incorporated under the laws of Bermuda, Brasil Telecom of America Inc., which is incorporated under the laws of the United States of America, Brasil Telecom de Venezuela S.A., which is incorporated under the laws of Venezuela, and Internet Group (Cayman) Limited and iBest Holding Corporation, which are incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands.


2633



34


Table of Contents

BrT Serviços de Internet S.A.

     We formed BrTSi in October 2001. Through BrTSi, we provide broadband internet services through our internet service provider ("ISP") BrTurbo and data center services. BrTSi is also

     Through BrTurbo, a broadband Region II leader, iBest, the parent company of our freelargest internet service provider in Region II for dial-up internet access, and iG, the first dial-up access provider and one of the largest content providers iGwith a broadband presence outside Region II, we compete in all territories in Brazil, in all internet segments. The following is a description of iBest and iBest.iG.

     iBest

     In November 2001, BrTSiwe acquired 15.4% of iBest Holding Corporation for approximately R$US$10.0 million. iBest Holding Corporation controlledcontrols iBest S.A. ("iBest"), a free internet service provider and important brand name. On June 26, 2003, we acquired through our wholly owned subsidiary, BrTSi, the remaining capital of iBest Holding Corporation for U.S.$US$36.0 million, consolidating our 100% ownership of iBest. The iBest Group wasis composed by the following main entities: (i) iBest Holding Corporation; (ii) iBest S.A.; (iii) Febraio S.A.;Corporation and (iv) Freelance S.A. On May 31st, 2004, a corporate reorganization of the iBest Group was concluded, and Freelance fully incorporated Febraio S.A., iBest S.A. and its subsidiary Mail BR Comunicações Ltda. Freelance S.A. became the owner of iBest's trademark, and is now the operating company of the Group.

     iG

     In November 2004,July 2005, we concludedacquired 25.6% of the acquisition of approximately 63% of iG´s capital stock for U.S.$104.9 million. Considering thatof Internet Group (Cayman) Ltd. (“iG”). With this aquisition, combined with previous holdings of 73% of iG’s total capital by Brasil Telecom Participações S.A. already held, indirectly, 10% of iG´s total capital, both companies nowand Brasil Telecom S.A., we hold approximately 73%98.6% of the total capital of iG. iG is the leading dial-up internet service provider in Brazil. TheThrough the acquisition of iG, made uswe became the largest internet companyservice provider in Latin America.

Grupo BrT Cabos Submarinos (Submarine Fiber-Optic Cable System)

     On June 11, 2003, we acquired the entirea submarine fiber-optic cable system from GlobeNet Communications Group Ltd., which we now refer to as Grupo BrT Cabos Submarinos, (former GlobeNet), for U.S.$US$46.8 million. A total of U.S.$US$27.6 million was paid on June 11, 2003, with the remaining U.S.$US$19.2 million payable within 18 months of the first installment. As of December 31, 2004 thereWe signed a final agreement on April 20, 2005, when we paid US$16.2 million. US$3.0 million was an outstanding balance of U.S.$12.0 millionretained to be paid until April 30, 2005.cover contingences discovered after the acquisition. Grupo BrT Cabos Submarinos is formed bycomposed of five operating subsidiaries: Brasil Telecom Cabos Submarinos (Holding) Ltda., Brasil Telecom Cabos Submarinos Ltda., Brasil Telecom of America, Inc., Brasil Telecom Subsea Cable Systems (Bermuda) Ltd. and Brasil Telecom de Venezuela, S.A. These companies own and operate the Grupo BrT Cabos Submarinos fiber optic cable system that connects the United States, Bermudas,Bermuda, Brazil and Venezuela. Brasil Telecom of America, Inc. is headquartered in Boca Raton, Florida, and coordinates all Grupo BrT Cabos Submarinos's activities and supports the commercial activities of the group in the international market. Grupo BrT Cabos Submarinos is also the parent company of iG, our internet service provider.

14 Brasil Telecom Celular S.A

     14 Brasil Telecom Celular S.A. ("Brasil Telecom GSM") is our mobile telephonytelephone services subsidiary, which became operational on September 27, 2004. Brasil Telecom GSMMobile offers wireless telecommunications services using Global System for Mobile Communications ("GSM") technology under the brand name "Brasil Telecom GSM".GSM." See "—Business Overview—Wireless Services." We have entered into the Merger Agreement with TIMB, pursuant to which we have agreed to merge Brasil Telecom GSM into TIMB in return for an ownership interest in TIMB, the size of such interest to be determined based on appraisals of relative value to be performed by an international investment banking firm hired by us. (See “Risk Factors - Risks Relating to Our Company” for a discussion of current obstacles to these transactions)

Vant Telecomunicações S.A.

     On May 13, 2004, we exercised our option to purchase for R$15.6 million the remaining 80.1% of the capital of Vant, giving us 99.99% of the capital of Vant. This purchase was made possible once we received

27


Table of Contents

certification by Anatel of our compliance with our 2003 universalization targets. Vant offers internet protocol as well as other products to the corporate market throughout Brazil.

35


Table of Contents

MetroRED Telecomunicações Ltda.Brasil Telecom Comunicação Multimidia

     On May 13, 2004, we exercised our option to purchase for U.S.$US$ 51.0 million the remaining 80.1% of the capital of MTH, giving us 99.9% of the capital of MTH. This purchase was made possible once we received certification by Anatel of our compliance with our 2003 universalization targets. MetroREDBrasil Telecom Comunicação Multimidia is a leading local fiber optic network provider, with 343 kilometers of local network in São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro and Belo Horizonte, and a 1,600 kilometer long-distance network linking these three metropolitan areas as well asareas. Brasil Telecom Comunicação Multimidia also has an internet solutions data center in São Paulo which will provideprovides internet support to our customers. As part of the acquisition, we also integrated a management team with expertise in these markets.

Capital Expenditures

     The following table sets forth our capital expenditures on plant expansion and modernization for each of the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2004.2005.

 Year ended December 31, 
  Year ended December 31, 
 2002  2003  2004  
(millions of reais)
    2003  2004  2005 
 (millions ofreais   
Conventional Telephony  416.5  302.8  179.7 
Conventional Telephone  302.8  179.7  256.5 
Data Network  231.3  264.9  300.0  264.9  300.0  411.5 
Network Operation  372.8  251.6  270.2  251.6  270.2  292.2 
Information Technology  366.8  210.1  216.1  210.1  216.1  180.8 
Other(1)  590.2  655.4  725.2  655.4  725.2  395.4 
Total – Fixed Telephony  1,977.6  1,684.8  1,691.2 
Total – Fixed Telephone  1,684.8  1,691.2  1,536.4 
      
Total – Mobile Telephony  - -  109.2  1,175.7 
Total – mobile Telephone  109.2  1,175.7  441.3 
      
Total capital expenditures  1,977.6  1,794.0  2,866.9  1,794.0  2,866.9  1,977.7 
      

(1)     These investments include the acquisition of PCS licenses, the acquisition of Grupo BrT Cabos Submarinos, MetroRED,Brasil Telecom Comunicação Multimidia, iBest, Vant and iG, and investments to replace plant equipmentin transmission backbone, special platforms, technical and other fixed assets generally without altering the capacity of the assets replaced and certain investments in operational and technical support such as telecommunications management network systems besides regulatory and expansioninterconnection projects.

     Our capital expenditures increaseddecreased by approximately 59,8%31.0% to R$2,866.91,977.7 million in the year ended December 31, 2004,2005, from R$1,794.02,866.9 million for the corresponding period in 2003.2004. Of our total 2005 capital expenditures, R$1,215.11,490.2 million relaterelated to fixed telephonyfixed-line telephone and internet operations, R$ 1,175.7441.3 million to mobile telephonytelephone operations and R$476.146.6 million to acquisitions. The capital expenditures on the expansion and modernization of our fixed telephonyfixed-line telephone operations consist mainlyrelated primarily to upgrading the capacity of updating technology and upgrading capacity in relation to our transmission backbone switching centers, data network and intelligent network.implementation of regulatory projects to meet Anatel’s requirements.

Expected Capital Expenditures on Plant Expansion and Modernization

     We currently expect to invest approximately R$2,166.02,161.3 million in the expansion and modernization of our network during the fiscal year 2005,2006, which includes investments of approximately R$398.0464.3 million in our mobile telephone network. Considering that we have entered into a Merger Agreement, investments in our mobile telephone network are subject to change. See “Risk Factors - Risks RelatingRelated to Our Company”Business” for a discussion of current obstacles to these transactions. Of our total expected capital expenditures, R$500.0616.7 million relaterelates to targets established by Anatel and required under the terms and conditions of our concessions. This amount may be revised by our board of directors once ongoing negotiations with Anatel come to an end. See Item 5 "Operating“Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Capital Expenditures."

28


Table of Contents

Acquisition of PCS Licenses

     As part of our strategy of providing integrated solutions to our clients, we acquired PCS licenses for R$191.5 million at an auction held on November 19, 2002.

     On December 18, 2002, we paid the equivalent of 10.0% and in December 18, 2005 we paid the equivalent of 15.0% of the total bid amount at auction. The remaining 90.0% was to75.0% will be paid in sixfive equal installments annually,

36


Table of Contents

each respectively due 12, 24, 36, 48 60, 72, 84 and 9660 months after the last payment date (December 18, 2005). The amount of the signing of the term of authorization. These installments will be adjusted monthly adjusted by the IGP-DI index plus 1.0% interest rate over the indexed amount calculated from the term execution date. If we are able to complete the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, then we do not expect to make payments other than those incurred by the time of the accomplishment of the Agreement.

Business Overview

     We provide fixed-line telecommunications services in Region II under concessions which we assumed from each of Telepar, Telesc, Telegoiás, Telebrasília, Telemat, Telems, Teleron, Teleacre, CTMR and CRT for each of the states in our region. These concessions were granted by the Brazilian government to us and to each of these companies as a result of the privatization process. Until January 2004, these concessions authorized us to provide local and intrastateintra-regional fixed-line telecommunications services in nine states located in the northern, western, central and southern regions of Brazil and in the Federal District. These concession areas constitute our region. See "—Our region.Region." As a result of these original concessions, we are the leading provider of local fixed-line telecommunications services and intraregional fixed-line telecommunications services in our region. Local fixed-line telecommunications services include all calls that originate and terminate within a single local area, as well as, installation, monthly subscription, public telephones and supplemental local services. IntrastateIntra-regional fixed-line telecommunications services include all calls between local areasstates within a state.concession area. We also offer broadband services to our customers that allow them to access the internet and represent an important new source of revenue.

     Since January 2004, we have been able to offer interregional and international long-distance telecommunications services. We also provide a variety of data transmission services through various technologies and means of access. Since 1999, we have invested in data transmission capacity in response to the growing demand in Brazil for data, images and text transmission services, mainly for corporate networks and corporate and residential Internet access.

     Our business, including the service we provide and the rates we charge, is subject to comprehensive regulation by Anatel, an independent regulatory agency, under the General Telecommunications Law and various administrative enactments thereunder. The licenses and concessions under which we operate our fixed-line services imposed certain universalization, expansion and modernization targets on us. On January 19, 2004, we received certification by Anatel that we havehad accomplished our universalization targets established for December 31, 2003. Accordingly, we were authorized to offer local fixed and domestic and international long-distance telephone services, whether originated inside or outside our region. We also acquired a license to provide mobile telephone services in our region.

     Our main competitors in the fixed-line telecommunications area are Embratel, Intelig, Global Village Telecom, Telesp, Telemar, TIM, Claro, Vivo, Companhia de Telecomunicações do Brasil Central ("CTBC Telecom") and Sercomtel Telecomunicaçoes S.A.("Sercomtel"). The mobile telephone business is a highly competitive one, and Region II has the highest penetration rate in the country by outsider service providers. Our main competitors in the mobile telecommunications area are TIM, Claro and Vivo.

     In 2004 we obtained authorization from the Anatel to provide wireless services through our Brasil Telecom GSM arm, for the acquisition and installation of network equipment and the integration of mobile telephone with other products of the Brasil Telecom Group. Our license to provide wireless service is valid for fifteen years and may be renewed for another fifteen years.

37


Table of Contents

Our StrategyStrategic Results for 2005

     Our goal isAs our strategic priorities for 2005, we resolved to become a leading providerexpand our mobile telephone business, increase our broadband subscriber base, grow the range of integrated telecommunications services in Brazilalternative rate plans offered and increase our market share in the Latin American countriesinter-regional and international segments.

     As of December 31, 2005, Brasil Telecom GSM had a market share of 8.7%, despite fact that we can reachRegion II had a 41% penetration rate at the time Brasil Telecom GSM launched mobile operations. In addition, Brasil Telecom GSM was able to obtain the best percentage of monthly paying (post-paid) customers in its operational region.

     We ended the year with our international infrastructure. We intenda total of 1,013,893 broadband subscribers, up 89.3% compared to achieve this goal bythe previous year, maintaining our strong positionleadership in the localmarket, with the best ratio of broadband accesses to lines in service.

     We also launched various different alternative rate plans to adapt our service to the socio-economic profile of the population in our region, reducing the amount of disconnected fixed-line terminals. As of December 31, 2005, 8.2% of lines in service were serviced by alternative rate plans.

     In the data communications market, we created solutions focused on various sectors of the economy, such as the automotive and long distance markets while at the same time enhancing our existing services and developing new services which complement our existing products and services,agribusiness segments, as well as municipal authorities. Based on analysis and understanding of the inter-relationships of our clients with their suppliers, customers and external agents, we were able to launch a number of segmented promotions, adding security, efficiency, state-of-the-art technology and greater value to our clients participating in these promotions.

Strategy for 2006

     In 2006, the telecommunications sector is likely to undergo significant transformation, with repercussions on the business model of all the operating companies. New technologies are making the use of broadband access, both for fixed-line and mobile telephones, as well as enlarging the range of converging solutions, based mainly on Internet protocol.

     It is already possible to see a trend of replacing fixed-lines by implementingmobile accesses, with an immediate impact on traffic generated by the former and the switching over, still incipient, from conventional voice traffic to VoIP (Voice over Internet Protocol). The result of this process is a reduction in revenue from fixed-line voice traffic.

     This reduction would have already been evident in the past few years, if it had not been for tariff increases. Adding to the complexity of this scenario is that the new revenues coming from IP world, for example, are still low and therefore do not compensate for the loss which is being seen in fixed-line voice revenues.

     To align our planning with the realities of the market, we have selected the following key strategies:priorities for 2006:

     (1) To defend our main business, that of fixed-line voice traffic;

     (2) To expand our mobile telephone service, seeking to achieve a satisfactory balance between scale and profitability;

     (3) To exploit growth opportunities in data and internet, ensuring profitability;

     (4) To build a portfolio of converging promotions in the customer environment – voice, data and images – to reduce client turnover and increase the average customer bill;

     (5) To increase operational efficiency, applying the necessary rigorous controls in terms of cash allocation; and

38


Table of Contents

     (6) To create value for our shareholders, in an ethical and transparent manner, through our relationships with our partners.

Offer interregional and international long-distance services

     We intend to increase our market share in our business of providing long-distance service. Since January 22, 2004 we have begun offeringoffered interregional and international long distance services and started

29


Table of Contents

competing directly with other regional operators whichthat currently provide such services. By offering interregional and international long-distance services, we expect to be able to offer our existing corporate and residential clients more competitive and integrated plans and capture additional market share. We intend to leverage the strength of the "Brasil Telecom" brand in Region II and to solidifyconsolidate Brasil Telecom as the carrier of choice through advertising campaigns that promote the use of our carrier selection code "14" and the synergies across our growing portfolio of integrated services, including wireless, data and long-distance services nationwide. OurHowever, our ability to offer national and international fixed-line services and/or mobile services in the same regions as TIM are at risk of being terminated by Anatel if the transactions contemplatedcould be adversely affected by the Merger Agreement involvingissues involved in our wireless operations and the surrender by TIMB of long distance licenses are not allowed to be completed by July 18, 2005.relationship with TIM. See "Risk Factors—Certain Beneficial Shareholders……"Risks Related to Our Business” for a further discussion.

Strengthen our wireless telecommunications services

     Since September 27, 2004 we have begun offeringoffered wireless telecommunications services using Global System for Mobile Communications ("GSM") technology through our subsidiary, 14 Brasil Telecom Celular S.A., and under the brand name "Brasil Telecom GSM".GSM. With the introduction of wireless services, we are the only company in Region II to offer both wireline and wireless services and we expect to leverage this to increase our brand awareness and overall market share. We are able to offer competitive wireless service plans due, among other things, to the attractive prices paid for our licenses and the favorable terms available to us from our equipment vendors. We also intend to realize the synergies between our wireline and wireless operations by marketing to our existing client database, using our existing wireline sales channels, providing integrated packages and sharing infrastructure and operational systems. We also intend to develop new mobile products and services for the corporate market. If we are able to complete the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, then we will not be offering wireless services directly but will participate in this business through the acquisition of an equity interest in TIMB, which as of April 28, 2005, had approximately 14.6 million wireless users. The Merger Agreement also contemplates operational agreements through which we will be able to continue to offer convergence services.

Continue to integrate and acquire high technology network infrastructure in order to position ourselves as a market leader in the Brazilian corporate market

     Our acquisition in June 2003 of Grupo BrT Cabos Submarinos, our submarine fiber optic cable system, and our acquisition in May 13, 2004 of MetroRED,Brasil Telecom Comunicação Multimidia, our local fiber-optic network, and Vant, our internet protocol provider, provided us with a state-of-the-art broadband infrastructure as well as local network capacity. These networks consist of a 22,000 kilometer submarine fiber optic system connecting us to Latin America and the United States, as well as 343 kilometers of local and 1,600 kilometers of long-distance fiber-optic lines in Brazil, allowing us to expand geographically to three principal corporate markets outside our region—São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro and Belo Horizonte.

     In addition, through MetroREDBrasil Telecom Comunicação Multimidia we obtained an internet data center in São Paulo that will host various internet services. We have integrated these networks and this center into our existing network and business and intend to use this capacity to meet the growing demands for our network and data transmission services in order to become the market leader in both residential and corporate network and data transmission services.

Develop integrated voice, data and multimedia services for residential and corporate clients

     We intend to offer voice, data and multimedia products and services through our existing distribution channels as well as through new mobile phone stores. Our strategy is to provide a one-stop shopping environment for both residential and corporate clients, satisfying all of their local, long distance, mobile, network and data transmission service needs. We intend to maximize synergies and increase client loyalty by providing value-added services and to attract new clients and maintain existing clients by offering competitively priced products. We also intend to provide integrated customer service which will allow us to improve our service quality as well as increase our sales.

3039


Table of Contents

Evaluation of possible participation in consolidation of Brazilian telecommunications industry

     The Brazilian telecommunications industry has experienced and may continue to experience consolidation. We continue to evaluate potential consolidation opportunities in Brazil, which may include acquisitions or other methods of participation designed to increase our market share or to improve our efficiency.

     Convergence

     With the implementation of our effective mobile operations, we became the largest integrated telecommunications carrier in Region II, and this integration can be observed in our convergent and innovative products and in our One Stop Shop point of sales strategy.

Our Services

     The fixed-line telecommunications services that we offeroffered to our customers consist of (i) local services, including all calls that originate and terminate within a single local area in the region, as well as installation, monthly subscription, measured services, public telephones and supplemental local services, (ii) intraregional long-distance services which include intrastate (calls between local areas within a state in our region) and interstate (calls between states in our region), (iii) interregional and international long-distance services, (iv) network services, including interconnection leasing of facilities and fixed-to-mobile services,leasing, (v) data transmission services, (vi) wireless services and (vii) other services. On January 19, 2004, Anatel certified our compliance with universalization targets which enabled us to provide mobile services in our region and interregional and international long-distance services in all regions.

     The following table sets forth our revenue by type of service for the indicated years. Our rates for each category of service are discussed below under "—Rates." Trends and events affecting our operating revenue are discussed under Item 5 "Operating“Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects."

              Year ended December 31, 
 
 2002  2003  2004  
Year ended December 31 
    2003  2004  2005 
 (millions ofreais   
 
(millions ofreais)
Local services           6,255                         6,900  7,371  6,900  7,371  7,603 
Intraregional (Intrastate and Interstate) long-distance       
service           1,748                         1,923  2,394 
Intraregional (Intrastate and Interstate) long-distance service  1,923  2,394  2,626 
Interregional and International long-distance service           1                         1  249    249  364 
Network services           1,021                         1,051  970  1,051  970  941 
Data transmission     505                   766  1,069  766  1,069  1,531 
Mobile Services           -                           -  88    88  732 
Other     310                   437  622  437  622  890 
   
Gross operating revenues           9,840                       11,077  12,763  11,077  12,763  14,687 
Taxes and discounts         (2,769)                       (3,162)       (3,698)  (3,162) (3,698) (4,549)
   
Net operating revenues           7,071                         7,915  9,065  7,915  9,065  10,138 
   

     A concession of a telecommunication service is defined under the General Telecommunications Law as the delegation of the rendering thereof under the public regime, by means of a written agreement and for a determine period of time. The concessionaire will bear all business risks and its compensation will be the tariffs charged from the users and other alternative revenues. The concessionaire is directly responsible for the fulfillment of the underlying obligations and the damages it may cause. Concessions may only be granted to companies incorporated under Brazilian laws, and with both head office and management located in Brazil. Concessions will be granted by Anatel on a non exclusive basis and must comply with the general plan of awards approved by the Executive Branch as mentioned above. The maximum term of a concession will be of twenty years, renewable only once for an equal period.

     Concessions of telecommunications services have always been granted by means of a bidding procedure. The rules governing such bidding procedures were established by Anatel in Resolution No. 65, dated October 29, 1998. The provisions of Resolution No. 65 observe the constitutional principles and provisions of the General Telecommunications Law, particularly the following:

40


Table of Contents

(a)     the purpose of the bidding procedure is to determine the party which may provide and expand the service under the public regime, as well as fulfill the relevant universalization obligations, on an efficient and secure basis and charging reasonable tariffs;
(b)     the draft request for proposal of each procedure will be submitted to public consultation;
(c)     the request for proposal will (i) identify the relevant service and the conditions for the rendering, expansion and universalization thereof, (ii) establish objective criteria for acceptance and judgment of the proposals, (iii) regulate the procedure, (iv) indicate the applicable sanctions, and (v) determine the clauses and conditions of the relevant concession agreement;
(d)     the technical and operational and economic-financial requirements to be fulfilled for purposes of qualifying each bidder, as well as occasional bid or performance bonds, must be applicable equally to all bidders, compatible with the purpose of the procedure and proportional to the nature and dimension thereof;
(e)     all bidders must evidence that the same are in good standing and situation before the tax and social security authorities;
(f)     the judgment of the proposals must always be made in accordance with the criteria established in the relevant request for proposal, provided that one of the following criteria is adopted: (i) lowest tariff to be charged from the service users; (ii) highest price offered for the concessions; (iii) highest quality level of the services; (iv) best fulfillment of the demand; or (v) a combination of any two or more of the foregoing criteria; and
(g)     the rules governing the bidding procedures must ensure publicity of the request for proposal, adequate term of submission of the proposals and ample defense rights.

     According to the General Telecommunications Law and Resolution No. 65, the authorization by Anatel is an administrative act which permits the exploitation under the private regime of a telecommunications service, provided that the applicable objective and subjective requirements are duly met.

     Resolution No. 65 sets forth the procedures for the granting of authorizations by Anatel. Anatel may only deny a request for authorization if the maximum number of service providers is already achieved, if the granting of the authorization would jeopardize the rendering of the services under the public regime or in case of a relevant reason, in each case as duly justified by Anatel.

     There are certain objective requirements for the award of an authorization, including: (i) availability of the required radiofrequency, if applicable; and (ii) submission of a project that is technically feasible and compatible with the applicable regulations.

     In relation to the subjective requirements for obtaining an authorization for the exploitation of a collective interest service under the private regime, (i) the interested party must be organized under Brazilian laws, with both head office and management located in Brazil; (ii) such party may neither be prevented from participating in bidding procedures carried out by the public authorities, nor from entering into agreements with public authorities; (iii) the Brazilian authorities may not have declared the forfeiture of any concession, permission or authorization held by the interest party in the prior two years; (iv) the interested party must have technical qualification to provide service, economic-financial capacity, be in good standing before the tax and social security authorities; (v) the interested party is not, in the same region, place or area, a provider of the same category of service.

     On June 20, 2003, Anatel approved a new General Plan on Quality and the concession contract model under which all fixed-line telecommunications carriers already operate since January 1, 2006 onwards. On June 28, 2003, Decree 4769 was entered approving the General Plan on Universal Service. See "—Obligations of Telecommunications Companies—New Telecommunications Regulations." The new Concession Contracts for

41


Table of Contents

Public Switched Telephone Network were signed in December 22, 2005 and begin as of January 1, 2006. It has duration until 2025. Five year reviews are budgeted during the concession period.

     Additionally, the AICE regulation was included in the General Plan on Universal Service in order to facilitate the progressive universalization of individual fixed telephone access. AICE is a class of PSTN basic plan in which subscriber must pay a monthly subscription of R$16.5 (net of taxes). On the AICE plan, the rate paid is the same as that of a local call with 2 minutes increment per each realized call (customer care rate), with a 2 minute minimum call rate. The plan operates as a pre-paid model in that the subscriber has to obtain credits in order to use the service, being offered in households that do not have other residential lines.

Local Services

     We are the leading provider of local telecommunications services in our region with an estimated 95.0%94.6% market share.share as of December 31, 2005. In local fixed-line services, our main competitor is Global Village Telecom. Global Village Telecom is an independent service provider operating under an authorization from Anatel. As of December 31, 2004,2005, we had approximately 9.59.6 million lines in service. We own and operate public telephones throughout our region. At December 31, 2004,2005 we had approximately 295.9 thousand296,900 public telephones and a ratio of public telephones /per 100 lines installed equal to 2.762.69 which meets Anatel's service targets. We also provide a variety of other supplemental local services that include voice mail, call waiting, call forwarding, conferencing, speed dialing and caller ID.

     To date, numerous companies have permissionbeen authorized by Anatel to provide local fixed telecommunications services in our region. Our fixed-line services are also subject to competition from wireless service providers. See Item 3 "Key“Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks RelatingRelated to the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry—We face increasing competition in the Brazilian telecommunications industry which may have a material adverse effect on

31


Table of Contents

our market share, results of operations and financial condition." We have also been authorized to provide local fixed telecommunications services outside our region, howeveralthough as of May 31, 2005,2006, we have not done so.

     Our local services also include fixed-to-mobile services, consisting of calls that originate on a fixed-line telephone and terminate on a mobile or cellular device. The fixed-to-mobile basic tariff per-minute are generally known as Communication Value-1, or “VC-1.”

Intraregional (intrastate and interstate) long-distance serviceservices

     Calls from one local area in a region to another local area in the same region are referred to as "intraregional long-distance" calls. Intraregional long-distance service includes intrastate long-distance calls (calls within a given state in a region) and interstate long-distance calls (calls between states in a region). Prior to merging into us, each of Telepar, Telesc, Telegoiás, Telebrasília, Telemat, Telems, Teleron, Teleacre, CTMR and CRT was the exclusive provider of intrastate long-distance service in itstheir respective state. As a result we became and still are the leading provider of intrastate fixed-line telecommunications services in our region with a 90.3%90.6% intrastate average market share and an estimated 79.5%84.1% interstate average market share in 2004. Until July 1999, Embratel was the exclusive provider of interstate long-distance service.2005.

     Pursuant to Anatel regulations, callers are able to choose a service provider for each long distance call by selecting a carrier selection code that identifies the carrier. Until July 6, 2003, this was permitted only for calls made from fixed linefixed-line phones. Since such date, mobile callers can also choose a service provider by selecting a carrier selection code. Our carrier selection code is "14"."14."

     AsUntil July 1999, Embratel was the exclusive provider of interstate long-distance service. In July 1999, Embratel and Intelig were authorized by Anatel to provide intrastate long-distance services within the states in our region, and we were authorized to begin to provideproviding interstate long-distance services between the states in our region. See "—Competition." As a result we have been expandingexpanded our network to provide interstate long-distance service in our region to compete against Embratel, and Embratel and Intelig have been expandingexpanded their networks to provide intrastate long-distance service to compete against us. Until we completeEven with this expansion, we may from time to time lease transmission facilities from other carriers to complete interstate long-distance calls between states in our region. To date, numerous

42


Table of Contents

companies have permission by Anatel to provide intraregional long distance telecommunications services in our region. See Item 3 "Key“Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks RelatingRelated to the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry—We face increasing competitionIndustry.

     Our intraregional services also include fixed-to-mobile services, consisting of calls that originate in a fixed-line telephone and terminate on a mobile or cellular device. The fixed-to-mobile rate per-minute charges are generally Communication Value – 2, or “VC-2,” for calls outside the cellular subscriber's registration area but inside the region where the respective cellular provider provides service, and Communication Value – 3, or “VC-3,” for calls outside the subscriber's registration area and outside the region where the respective cellular provider provides service. The use of our fixed-to-mobile services has increased significantly in the Brazilian telecommunications industry which may havepast five years as the penetration rate of mobile phones in our region has increased. We are the leading operator in the inter-city fixed-to-mobile services segment in our Region and reached, in December 2005 a material adverse effect on our market share results of operations86.2% and financial condition."66.2% for interregional calls in VC-2 and VC-3 areas, respectively.

Interregional and International ServiceServices

     Historically, under Anatel rules, regional fixed-line companies, such as us, generally were not permitted to offer interregional or international long-distance services until December 31, 2003 (the date designed to correspond with the certification of our universalization targets by Anatel).2003. As a result of Anatel having certified our compliance with universalization targets, on January 19, 2004, we began offering interregional long-distance and international long-distance services. Interregional long-distance services consist of calls between locationsregions within Brazil. International long-distance services consist of calls between different regions within Brazil and a location outside of Brazil. In order to provide these services, we have entered into interconnection agreements with Telemar and Telesp and we will also make use of the cable network we acquired through the Grupo BrT Cabos Submarinos acquisition (linking Brazil with the United States, Bermuda and Venezuela) and through the MetroREDBrasil Telecom Comunicação Multimidia acquisition (providing network facilities in São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro and Belo Horizonte). Our market share for these services havehas increased rapidly throughout 20042005 and reached 35.6%averages of 58.7% and 23.8%33.8% in the interregional and international segments in our Region, respectively.respectively, as of December 31, 2005. To date, numerous companies have permissionbeen authorized by Anatel to provide interregional and international long distance telecommunications services in our region. See Item 3 "Key Information—“Item 3. Key Information – Risk Factors—Factors – Risks RelatingRelated to the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry—We face increasing competition in the Brazilian telecommunications industry which may have a material adverse effect on our market share, results of operations and financial condition." We also expect to benefit from the “preferred provider” status that pursuant to the Merger Agreement TIMB has agreed to give our long distance services as well as other telecommunications services and products. If the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement involving our wireless operations and the surrender by TIMB of long distance licenses are not allowed to be completed by July 18, 2005, our ability to offer national and international long distance services and/or mobile services in the same regions as TIM would be at risk of being terminated by Anatel. See "Risk Factors—…Certain Beneficial Shareholders Control…"

32


Table of ContentsIndustry.

Network Services

     Our Networknetwork services consist of interconnection and lease of facilities and fixed-to-mobile services.facilities.

     Interconnection servicesServices

     Interconnection services consist of the use of our network by other telecommunications providers in order to:

     Use of our interconnection services has grown substantially since they were introduced in 1998, as a result of:

43


Table of Contents

     Telecommunications service providers are required to provide interconnection services on a nondiscriminatory basis. Subject to certain requirements, they are free to negotiate the terms of their interconnection agreements, but if the parties fail to reach an agreement, Anatel will arbitrate the controversy and establish the terms and conditions of interconnection. See "—History and Development of the Company—Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry—Obligations of Telecommunications Companies—Interconnection" and "—Rate Regulation." The terms of our interconnection services, particularly the pricing and technical requirements of these services, may affect our results of operations, competitive environment and capital expenditure requirements.

     We provide interconnection services to long-distance providers, such as Embratel, Intelig, Global Village Telecom,"espelhinhos", small private regime operators called “espelhinhos,” and certain operators of trunking services. We also provide interconnection services to the cellular service providers that were spun off from each of Telepar, Telesc, Telegoiás, Telebrasília, Telemat, Telems, Teleron, Teleacre and CTMR as well as all Band B, Band D and Band E cellular service providers in our region.

Lease of Facilities

     Other telecommunications service providers, particularly cellular service providers, lease trunk lines from our company for use within their own network, which are used for bulk transmission of voice and data messages. Large corporate customers lease lines from our company for use in private networks connecting different corporate sites. We also lease our telecommunications facilities to Embratel and Intelig in order to provide access to our network.

Fixed-to-Mobile Services

     Fixed-to-mobile services consist of calls that originate in a fixed-line telephone and terminate on a mobile or cellular device. The cellular base rate per-minute charges are generally VC-1 (Communication Value – 1) for local calls, VC-2 (Communication Value – 2) for calls outside the cellular subscriber's registration area but inside the region where the respective cellular provider provides service, and VC-3 (Communication Value – 3) for calls outside the subscriber's registration area and outside the region where the respective cellular provider provides

33


Table of Contents

service. The use of our fixed-to-mobile services has increased significantly in the past five years as the penetration rate of mobile services in our region has increased. We are the leading operator in the inter-city fixed-to-mobile services segment in our Region and reached, in 2004, the market share of 82.7% and 56.6% for interregional calls in VC-2 and VC-3 areas, respectively.

Data Transmission Services

     We provide a variety of data transmission services through various technologies and means of access. Since 1999, we have invested in data transmission capacity in response to the growing demand in Brazil for data, images and text transmission services, mainly for corporate networks and corporate and residential Internet access.

     The primary data product that we offer to both residential and corporate clients is Turbo, our broadband access service based on Asymmetric Digital Subscriber Line (ADSL) technology. Turbo is an important product because it creates additional revenues for fixed line, retains customers and acts as a primary access or last mile for other services which we offer currently, such as BrTurbo, our broadband internet service provider for residential clients and corporations. In addition Turbo provides us withcorporations that will be a platform to offerfor new value-added services, that increase the average revenue per user, such as "TvFone" and "Turbo Video" which was launched in October 2004. TvFone allows point-to-point videoconferences, over ADSL technology with more than 600kbps, using regular TV and telephone sets. Turbo Video is a video on demand service over PC, offered by BrTurbo that allows the delivery of high-quality streams to its customers.and Voice-Over-Internet Protocol, or VoIP. We intend to continue to invest in our broadband business focusing on the growth of average per user, or ARPU, and the expansion of our network in order to better serve the expected increase in demand for this type of service, particularly in the Internet access market.

     In addition to ADSL, we offer various data transmission services that are designed specifically for corporate clients such as:and government customers. Since October 2004, in order to deliver services that fulfill the needs of our customers’ applications, our data transmission services portfolio was reformulated into four product families.

     Internet Access Family– designed for corporate customers that need a high performance and high quality connection to internet backbone. The Internet Access Family includes a Dedicated Internet Protocol ("Dedicated IP), which is a leased line that functions as a dedicated gate for access to the internet backbone typically used by internet service providers. The Internet Access Family also included Dial up internet access, a remote dial up internet access which we market under the name "DialNet." DialNet is used primarily by corporate internet service providers to provide remote access to corporate networks.

Advanced Services Family – comprised of value-added technologies and services to complement our data transmission services portfolio. The Advanced Services Family includes (1) PLUS, which is a set of services that provide rental and management of telecommunications equipments to corporate customers, (2) VIP, which is a set of services that provide to corporate customers the transparency of the network quality by combining on-line reports, differentiated service level agreements and e pro-active network supervision, and (3) Audio, Video and Web Conferencing Services, which is a new product that we market to corporate customers under the “MultiConferências” brand name as a value-added service, which is fully integrated, with expert advice, support and management.

MetroREDBrasil Telecom Comunicação Multimidia

     On May 13, 2004, we purchased the remaining 80.1% stake giving us 99.99% of the capital share of MTH, the parent company of MetroRED. MetroREDBrasil Telecom Comunicação Multimidia. Brasil Telecom Comunicação Multimidia established its Brazilian branch in August 1997, beginning its commercial operations in December 1998 by providing private digital telecommunications network capabilities to the corporate segment.

     Through MetroRED we provide our corporate data transmission services through local fiber optic networks in the SãBrasil Telecom Comunicação Paulo, Rio de Janeiro and Belo Horizonte markets. MetroRED has 343 km of metropolitan network in São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro and Belo Horizonte, and 1,600 km of long-distance network connecting these three cities. In addition to its private network, MetroRED also has an Internet solution center of 3,790 square meters, which

34


Table of Contents

offers data center services and support such as co-location and hosting among others. As part of the acquisition, we acquired a management team with expertise in these markets. Currently, MetroRED has 648 clients in Brazil.

     MetroREDMultimidia plays a key role in our strategy to expand outside Region II, due to its excellent positioning in the key data service markets (São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro and Belo Horizonte) as well as its highly qualified executive team. With a technologically advanced data network which complements our existing networks, MetroREDBrasil Telecom Comunicação Multimidia gives us direct access to main corporate clients in Brazil to whom we can offer national as well as international services, through Grupo BrT Cabos Submarinos' infrastructure. The integration process of MetroREDBrasil Telecom Comunicação Multimidia with our other services, carried out throughout 2004, captured many synergies, not only on sales opportunities but also in reduction of general and administrative, and information technology costs. According to a study we conducted in 2002, approximately 80.0% of the interregional long-distance traffic originating in our region terminates in the three states where MetroREDBrasil Telecom Comunicação Multimidia has its network. Bynetwork and using MetroRED'sits infrastructure, we realize savings, as we do not have to use a third parties'party infrastructure to complete these calls. The integration of MetroREDBrasil Telecom Comunicação Multimidia with our existing services also increases our competitiveness in the other Regions, furthering our strategy of expanding beyond Region II.

     Brasil Telecom Comunicação Multimidia provides services in data center, internet, data transmission, and was the first Brazilian company to use fiber optics to provide high quality performance and security for offices. The BrT Multimida Communication infra-structure has 343 km of metropolitan network in São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro and Belo Horizonte, and 1,600 km of long-distance network connecting these three cities.

     In addition to its private network, Brasil Telecom Comunicação Multimidia also has an Internet solution center of 3,790 square meters, which offers data center services and support including co-location and hosting. As part of our acquisition, we acquired a management team with expertise in these markets. Currently, Brasil Telecom Comunicação Multimidia has 636 clients in Brazil, comprised primarily of corporate clients.

Vant

     On May 13, 2004, we purchasedexercised our option to purchase for R$15.6 million the remaining 80.1% stakeof the capital of Vant, giving us 99.99% of the share capital of Vant. Founded onin October 1999, Vant was the first telecom company in Brazil to offer 100.0%a network based on the Internet Protocol, or IP, technology. Vant offers internet protocol

45


Table of its services over the TCP/IP network technology. Through Vant we offer Dedicated IP andContents

as well as other products to the corporate market throughout Brazil. TheBrazil, with a presence in the most territories of the country. In order to create a better synergy between the companies of our Group, and to decrease costs and operational expenses, we currently intend to cease the operations of Vant, acquisition is expanding ourwith its corporate solutions servicesclient base and assets being distributed to the other two regions where we were not active. As MetroRED, Vant had its processes integrated withrest of our other services throughout 2004, capturing synergies.Group.

Grupo BrT Cabos Submarinos

     We offer bandwidth and interconnectivity to our clientscustomers through Grupo BrT Cabos Submarinos (former(formerly known as GlobeNet). Grupo BrT Cabos Submarinos was, a company formed in 1998 to provide fiber-optic communications services in the United States and internationally between the United States and South America. Grupo BrT Cabos Submarinos's system is composed of two armored submarine cable rings, representing approximately 22,000 kilometers of high quality fiber-optic cable, linking Brazil to the United States, passing through Venezuela and the Bermuda Islands, with an installed capacity of 80Gbps, with80 Gbps and the potential to increase to 1,360Gbps.1,360 Gbps.

     The infrastructure offered by Grupo BrT Cabos Submarinos assists us particularly in the expansion of our corporate data transmission services, allowing us to offer integrated services to national and international corporate clients which includes data communications (Internet and corporate) between Brazil and the USA.US. In addition, we can reduce our voice and data interconnections costs.

     During 2004,2005, Grupo BrT Cabos Submarinos reduced operational costs, renegotiated contracts and developed new businesses in Venezuela, the Caribbean, the United States, Brazil, and other MercosurMercosul countries. These effortsIt also established important strategic partnerships which allowed the optimization of our network. As a result, Grupo BrT Cabos Submarinos to finishstarted providing international services in Venezuela where we signed service provider contracts that represent 40% of the year ended on December 31, 2004 generating positive cash flows and EBITDA.total Venezuelan international Internet traffic.

     Additionally, Grupo BrT Cabos Submarinos gave us the necessary autonomy to carry our international voice and data traffic (including IP traffic), reducing interconnection and transport costs. In 2004,2005, we saved approximately U.S.$8.0US$16.0 million in international capacity rental expenses and we expect to save approximately U.S.$16.0US$20.6 million in 2005.2006.

Internet Services

     In October 2001, we formed BrTSi (a wholly owned subsidiary) which provides internet services through BrTurbo, iBest, and iG, and data communications services through Grupo BrT Cabos Submarinos.

35


Table     In October 2005, we began the operational integration process of Contentsour three Internet service providers: iG, iBest and Br Turbo. Through this consolidation, we expect to maintain our competitive position in the Brazilian internet market. More important than the traffic obtained by these providers and the access revenues originated from paid services is the customer relationship channel with other potential customers around the country.

     Our strategy is to use our internet business as the main vehicle in the Brazilian market, focusing on communication, information, services and entertainment. The internet service provider’s operational integration allows us to offer the best portfolio of products and services to our customers in addition to the operational synergy that we will gain.

BrTurbo

     We offer broadband Internet services through BrTurbo, our broadband Internet service provider, based on ADSL technology.or ISP. We created BrTurbo in 2002 as a broadband ISP to offer competitively priced broadband access and internet content. BrTurbo's content includes live transmission of news, entertainment channels, video channels with on-demand feature films and documentaries and an exclusive on-line games channel. In November 2002, BrTurbo launched TurboMeeting service, which allows two-line video-conferences.video-conferencing.

     In 2002, we developed BrTurbo Empresas, a line of services aimed at corporate clients, particularly small and medium-sized companies and home offices. As part of these services, we launched a portal which offers space

46


Table of Contents

for backup and storage of information, e-mail account, publication of Internet sites and hosting services. In March 2004, BrTurbo Empresas started offering a number of new products including Web Presence, Enterprise Webmail, Video Conference and BrTurbo VIP.

     The BrTurbo portal was redesigned in 2004 and its new platform brought technical and visual improvements, offering better navigability and interactivity. BrTSi also established new partnerships for the restructuring and content management of BrTurbo. In October 2004, we launched Turbo Video, a new video-on-demand service allowing clients to rent movies on-line. We also extended the offer of the BrTurbo Asas Wi-Fi service, which we launched in December 2003, to offer internet to subscribers who occasionally need access while in transit. In order to expand our nation-wide Wi-Fi network we have established partnerships with other players and invested in our own infra-structure. During 2005, we focused on consolidation of our BrTurbo brand while maintaining our regional leadership by introducing a new games channel, a new multimedia content distribution platform and new commercials and commercial content business partnership. We extended the coverage offered by BrTurbo Asas by 22% utilizing Wi-Fi technology in partnership with Brazilian airports. The number of customers accessing our BrTurbo Asas networks and the amount of time spent by customers on the wireless network doubled from the prior year.

     BrTurbo reached 548,000 customers in 2005, an increase of 106% over 2004, doubling BrTurbo’s client base for the second consecutive year.

iBest

     iBest was created in 1999 to develop commercially the "Prêmio iBest" brand name, an Internet award instituted in 1995 that quickly became a national reference for Internet awards in Brazil. In December 2001, iBest extended its activities in the Internet market by providing free dial up Internet access. The acquisition of iBest in June 2003 was a significant step in our Internet strategy. iBest is 100% controlled by us, and consolidates our existing leading position in the ISP market in Region II, giving us approximately 50% of the market share as of December 31, 2005. Furthermore, iBest has a presence in more than 1,800 cities with approximately 10 million clients registered and 1.5 million users active in the last 30 days.

     iBest isgenerated approximately 19 billion minutes of incoming calls during 2005, an important traffic generator (incoming calls),increase of 14% over 2004, which increases minutes of use and balances our traffic exchange with other networks in our Region. Through iBest, we have been able to minimize the risk of traffic drain by stimulating the use of iBest through dial up access, thereby increasing incoming traffic to our network. Traffic drain occurs when a competitor offers free internet services to customers in our region.Region. Because the interconnection regime in Brazil requires us to pay an interconnection fee to the service provider who completes a call originating from our network, free internet increases the traffic in the only one direction whichthat generates this interconnection revenue for the service provider. Without a matching increase in traffic in the other direction, the continued traffic imbalance willwould result in increasing costs for us. Through

     During 2005, seeking to improve its internet browsing interface, iBest we have been ablereviewed its strategy, diversifying its portfolio, launching paid products, restructuring its portal and internalizing its news channel. As a result, the portal audience increased 21% in users from January to minimize the risk of traffic drain by stimulating the use of iBest through dial up access, thereby increasing incoming trafficDecember, 2005, according to our network.Ibope Net Ratings.

     We intend to leverage iBest's large customer base by targeting sales of broadband services (ADSL) to iBest's dial up customers. In addition to ADSL, we can also offer integrated services such as voice (local and long-distance), data and internet to iBest's customers, making iBest an important sales channel for us and allowing us to protect an important customer base from our competition.

iG

     We also offer internet services through iG which we acquired in November 2004. iG was the first Brazilian portal to offer free internet access. Over the past years,Since inception, the business model of iG has developed significantly and the portal startedhas begun to generate revenues streams through advertising, e-commerce, broadband access, content commercialization, traffic generation, and other paid services such as connection accelerator, telephone customer support, wireless portal, premium email, hosting services, among others.

     iG is considered the largest dial-up internet service provider in Brazil with a market share of more than 30.0%30% of dial-up internet minutes. Additionally, iG is the largest wireless content portal of the country. iG has a presence in more than 31,200 cities, with approximately 18 million clients registered and 2.0 million active users. The 20 billion internet usersminutes generated from iG positions the company as the leader of traffic generation in Regions I and 7.7 million active email accounts.III, and Brazil’s largest access provider measured in both traffic and

3647


Table of Contents

number of users. As of December 31, 2005, iG’s broadband client base totaled 180,000, an increase of 65% over 2004.

     During 2005, iG introduced Megaplayer, the largest Brazilian Internet video center, Ig Pop, a music site, and Arena iG, an increasing–game portal. The iG Informa, a media active concept providing real time delivery of information directly to the client, was expanded to nine electronics displays in São Paulo, as well as advertising in Rio de Janeiro, Brasilia and Belo Horizonte airport.

     Through its wireless content portal, iG offers to mobile users a variety of products: ring tones, cards, images, news and videos.

     The acquisition of iG consolidates our existing leading position in the ISP market and strengthens our position in Regions I and III. Together, iG, iBest and BrTurbo serve approximately 53.2 million clients, which make usmakes our company the largest internet service provider in Latin America and one of the 15 largest providers worldwide.

Wireless Services

     In 2004, we satisfied all the prerequisites for the launch of our operations, including the authorizations for the rendering of mobile services conferred by Anatel on January 19, 2004, the acquisition and installation of network equipment and the integration of mobile telephone with other products of the Brasil Telecom Group. Our license to provide wireless service is valid for fifteen years and may be renewed for another fifteen years.

     Competition in wireless services is intense, as the market is open to a number of larger competitors. Region II has the highest penetration rate by external competitive service providers in the country. The following table shows the percentage of total wireless services provided by outside service providers into Region II:

      Percent Change Over 
Penetration  September 2004  December 2005  Period 
    
   Region I  26.6%  39.1%  12.5% 
   Region II  40.2%  58.5%  16.0% 
   Region III  38.7%  52.4%  13.7% 
    
   Source:Anatel      

     With an effective implementation of mobile operations, we became the largest integrated telecommunications carrier in Region II. In 2005, our convergent and innovative products and our one-stop-shop flagship store point of sales program generated sales of 4,160 dial-up modems, 1,857 caller-ID devices, and 3,370 fixed phones.

     We are a member of the Fixed Mobile Convergence Alliance, or FMCA, a 22 member association with the principal goal of offering integrated products and technologies to clients from all members. We have also announced the entry of Brasil Telecom GSM as a sponsor member of the Internet Segura Movement, or MIS, and associated of Electronic Market Brazilian Commission (“E-Net Commission”). The company is the first telecommunications company of the sector to participate in MIS. We believe that the best way to prevent internet fraud is to educate our users. MIS acts to educate users on the necessary steps that must be taken to safeguard security information while using the internet.

Products and Services

     Through Brasil Telecom GSM, we offer three types of plans: post-paid, pre-paid and control (a plan where clients establish a pre-determined monthly rate and buy pre-paid credits if they wish to make extra calls). In addition to voice services, Brasil Telecom GSM clients can also take advantage of value-added services, some of them exclusive to our clients. For example, we are the only operator to offer mobile Banking service to our clients (regardless of the service provider of the mobile phone the client is using), Brasil Virtual Net, allowing our corporate clients to control their employees’ use of the internet, and mobile E-Mail, allowing our corporate clients to communicate, receive and answer e-mails through the use of a voice phone.

48


Table of Contents

     The following table summarizes some of the services that we currently provide to our wireless service clients:

GamesDownloadsInfotainmentMessagingOthers
Ego* Wall Paper Interactivities* Album Mobile E-Mail 
Java Games Screen Saver BrT mobile Menu Blog Brasil Virtual Net* 
Perfil* Monofonics Ringtons News Multimidia Card Voice Mail 
Quiz Mp3 Ringtons Jokes Services * Messenger Caller Id 
Senhor da Guerra Polifonics Ringtons Casseta Portal* BRT GSM SMS Waiting Call 
Super Trunfo* Videos Voice Portal SMS Chat Conference 
Wap MMS GPRS 
Wap Show (1)Rybena SMS (2)Follow-Me 
WEB SMS Banking (BB and 
Caixa Econômica)
Integrate Virtual
Answer Machine (3)
Advanced Voice
Mail 
Services launched in 2005. 
** Services we believe are exclusive to our mobile clients. 
(1)Wap Show is a tool that our clients use to create and administer personal or business websites, making available for download mobile phone ring tones, applications, or photos. 
(2)Rybena SMS allows everyone to communicate with the Deaf and Hard of Hearing through messages that are translated into the Signal Brazilian Language, enabling the Deaf and Hard of Hearing to see messages in written form, through flash animation on their mobile phones. 
(3)Integrate Virtual Answer Machine is a tool for clients who have fixed-line and mobile phone service from our company. With this service is possible to integrate fixed line voice mail for up to eight of our mobile voice mails, allowing our customers to receive voice mail message in one of eight distinct mobile voice mail boxes. 

     In addition to our basic services, we have offered several incentives designed to increase recognition of our brand name and foster customer loyalty, including convergence products, launch promotions, our one-stop-shop flagship stores, real time customer retention programs, and roaming incentives.

Convergence Products

     Bonus Every Month(Bônus Todo Mês). This product allows pos-paid clients to designate any Brasil Telecom fixed-line number to earn up to 200 minutes per month, equivalent to 50 pulses, (100 minutes per month, equivalent to 25 pulses, to pre-paid clients) in free local calls to any fixed-line number.

Boomerang 14(Bumerangue 14). This product allows Brasil Telecom GSM clients to earn credits from long distance calls made using our carrier selection code ("CSC 14"). Clients can then use their credits to make free local calls from their mobile phone to any Brasil Telecom fixed or mobile number.

Friends at All Times(Amigos Toda Hora). This product allows Brasil Telecom GSM post-paid clients to designate up to 14 numbers to connect with at a reduced rate of only R$0.10 (excluding taxes) per minute, at any time. The designated numbers may be fixed-line numbers of any operator or Brasil Telecom GSM mobile numbers. Brasil Telecom GSM pre-paid clients can elect seven numbers, one of which may be a fixed-line number.

The Only One(Único). This pre-paid service merges mobile, fixed-line and payphone services. Clients buy credits for their pre-paid mobiles, but also have the option to use the same credits to make phone calls from fixed-line or payphones. The client simply calls a toll free number and identifies the number to be called. The cost of the call is deducted from the pre-paid credits, and the rate charged is cheaper than the pre-paid one. Brasil Telecom GSM is also the only operator to offer SMS credits every time a calling card is purchased, regardless of the face value of the card.

49


Table of Contents

Launch Promotion

     The Pula-Pula promotion was created as an impact offer to be used during our initial entry into the mobile telephone market. Its main objective was to introduce a new brand in the mobile market and to accelerate the acquisition of our first million clients, thereby obtaining the minimum scale necessary to make our product attractive to competitors’ customers.

     As a result of the Pula-Pula promotion’s success, the offer was extended throughout 2005 and is currently being promoted, although gradual reductions in duration and discounts have been implemented since the launch of the promotion.

     In terms of duration, the first offer granted benefits to post and pre-paid customers until 2010, as opposed to the current promotion, which is only valid until 2008.

     Considering discounts, the post-paid Pula-Pula originally granted the amount billed in the “concession month” as a discount to be used in the following month. The current promotion offers a limited discount up to the amount of the subscription price.

     The original pre-paid Pula-Pula granted its users the amount of minutes received in one month as talk time in the following month. To be entitled for the benefit credits must be purchased at least once a month. On the other hand, our current pre-paid Pula-Pula client receives a maximum benefit of R$30.

     We believe our promotion has been adapted to successfully face competition with a proper balance of offered benefits.

Flagship Stores – One-stop-shop

     With the launch of our mobile operations in September 2004, we opened integrated flagship stores following the one-stop-shop concept. In those stores, clients have access to our entire portfolio of products and services and we are able to capitalize on the competitive advantages of an integrated telephone operation. The majority of our flagship stores are located in the main shopping centers of the capitals of the states of Region II. Our mobile brand, Brasil Telecom GSM, is also marketed in other points of sales, including kiosks, exclusive authorized sales agents, non-exclusive authorized sales agents and resellers among the main retailers.

Real Time Customer Retention

     With our convergence offers and the Pula-Pula promotion, we became the first company in Brazil to offer a Real Time Customer Retention program, eliminating the need for our clients to subscribe to a program, earn points, view catalogs, and request prizes. After acquiring a Brasil Telecom GSM mobile phone, our clients can immediately enjoy the benefits of our convergence offers and the Pula-Pula promotion.

Roaming

     The use of Brasil Telecom GSM phones is not restricted to Region II. Our clients have countrywide coverage through roaming agreements. Brasil Telecom GSM preferred roaming partners are Oi and TIM in Regions I and III, respectively. As a result of an agreement between Brasil Telecom GSM and Oi, our clients do not pay for roaming charges and can benefit from advantageous rates when using their phones in Oi´s authorization area, comprising the three south-eastern states (Minas Gerais, Rio de Janeiro, and Espírito Santo), the four northern states (Amazonas, Amapá, Pará, and Roraima) and the nine states in the northeast of Brazil (Bahia, Sergipe, Alagoas, Pernambuco, Paraíba, Rio Grande do Norte, Ceará, Piauí, and Maranhão). In the cities not covered by Oi the roaming will be done by Claro or Tim, with additional collection. In 2005 Brasil Telecom GSM established roaming data (GPRS) agreements with Claro and Oi operators, giving us coverage in all states for data services and therefore giving our customer the mobility to roam not just within Region II but to all Brazilian States. As of December 2005, we had 103 agreements with international operators in 59 countries, covering the principle tourist routes in South America, North America, Europe and Japan.

50


Table of Contents

Other Services

     WeIn addition to the services described above, we provide telecommunications services beyond local, long distance, network and data transmission services including value-added services (900,(such as 1-900 calling, call forwarding, voice mail, caller ID, call waiting, directory inquiry voice service) and advertising on public telephone cards. However, inIn accordance with our concessions, we are prohibited from providing cable television services, but we may lease our network to providers of such services.

Wireless ServicesClients

     As a result of our universalization targets certification by Anatel on January 19, 2004 and in furtherance of our business strategy to provide integrated telecommunications services both in our region and throughout Brazil, we started to offer wireless telephony services in our region using the PCS wireless license we obtained on December 18, 2002. Our license to provide wireless service is valid for fifteen years and may be renewed for another fifteen years.

     All the prerequisites for the launch of the operations of Brasil Telecom GSM were met in 2004, including the authorizations for the rendering of mobile services conferred by Anatel on January 19, 2004, the acquisition and installation of network equipment and the integration of mobile telephony with other products of the Brasil Telecom Group.

     As a result of the launch of its mobile operations, Brasil Telecom became the largest integrated telecommunications carrier in Region II, offering its clients a complete range of services, including fixed telephony, broadband and narrowband services, free internet, data transmission and mobile telephony.

     The full launch of operations to the general public was on September 27, 2004, with the announcement of the advantages of convergence (The Only One, Bonus Every Month, Friends at All Times, Talk for Less and Boomerang 14) and a launch promotion, the Pula-Pula.

     Brasil Telecom GSM started its operations with 18,000 post-paid clients, derived from the "Our Mobile" ("Nosso Celular") plan, which was created in January 2004 and targeted our employees and their relatives and friends.

Convergence Products

     Bonus Every Month (Bônus Todo Mês): allows clients to designate any Brasil Telecom fixed-line number to earn up to 200 minutes per month, equivalent to 50 pulses, in free local calls to any fixed-line number.

     Boomerang 14 (Bumerangue 14): allows Brasil Telecom GSM clients to earn credits from long distance calls made using the carrier selection code 14 ("CSC 14"). Clients can then use their credits to make free local calls from their mobile phone to any Brasil Telecom fixed or mobile number.

     Friends at All Times (Amigos Toda Hora): allows Brasil Telecom GSM post-paid clients to designate up to 14 numbers to speak to at a reduced rate of only R$0.10 (excluding taxes) per minute, at any time. The designated numbers may be fixed-line numbers of any operator or Brasil Telecom GSM mobile numbers. Brasil Telecom GSM pre-paid clients can elect seven numbers, one of which may be a fixed-line number.

     The Only One (Único): a pre-paid service that merges mobile, fixed-line and payphone services. Clients buy credits for their pre-paid mobiles, but also have the option to use the same credits to make phone calls from fixed-line or payphones. The client simply calls a toll free number and identifies the number to be called. The cost of the call is deducted from the pre-paid credits, and the rate charged is cheaper than the pre-paid one. Brasil Telecom GSM is also the only operator to offer SMS credits every time a calling card is purchased, regardless of the face value of the card.

37


Table of Contents

     Talk For Less (Fale por Menos): allows Brasil Telecom GSM customers to pay less for calls from a Brasil Telecom fixed-line number to a Brasil Telecom GSM mobile number. Calling mobile numbers from other operators is at least 60% more expensive, regardless of the time. This promotion was valid from October 1, 2004 to March 31, 2005.

Launch Promotion

     The Pula-Pula promotion is an offer used to promote the launch and positioning of Brasil Telecom GSM in the mobile telephony market.

     In the post-paid Pula-Pula, the amount billed in one month is deducted from the following month's bill, while in the pre-paid Pula-Pula the amount of minutes received in one month is credited as talk time in the following month, provided the customer buys credit at least once every month. The Pula-Pula promotion is guaranteed until 2010 for all clients who acquired their Brasil Telecom GSM phone by December 2004.

     We extended the Pula-Pula promotion, guaranteeing similar benefits until 2009 ("Pula-Pula de Verão" summer promotion) for mobile phones activated from January 1, 2005, to February 8, 2005, and until 2008 (the "Pula-Pula 2008" promotion) for mobile phones activated between April 1, 2005 and May 8, 2005.

Flagship Stores – One-stop-shop

     Our 16 flagship stores were created with an innovative concept in mind, the one-stop-shop. In our stores, clients have access to the entire portfolio of products and services of the Brasil Telecom Group (fixed-line, ADSL, mobile, free internet installation CDs, intelligent services, alternative bundles of DLD and ILD rates, accessories, modems and even personal computers). This initiative meets the needs of the clients and capitalizes on the competitive advantages of an integrated telephony operation. The majority of our flagship stores are located in the main shopping centers of Region II.

Real Time Customer Retention

     With our convergence offers and the Pula-Pula promotion, Brasil Telecom GSM became the first company in Brazil to offer a Real Time Customer Retention program, eliminating the need for our clients to subscribe to a program, earn points, view catalogs, and request prizes. After acquiring a Brasil Telecom GSM mobile phone, our clients can immediately enjoy the benefits of our convergence offers and the Pula-Pula promotion.

Roaming

     The use of Brasil Telecom GSM phones is not restricted to Region II. Our clients have countrywide coverage through roaming agreements. Brasil Telecom GSM’s preferred roaming partners are Oi and TIM in Rergions I and III, respectively. As a result of an agreement between Brasil Telecom GSM and Oi, our clients do not pay for roaming charges and can benefit from advantageous rates when using their phones in Oi´s authorization area, comprising the 3 south-eastern states (Minas Gerais, Rio de Janeiro, and Espírito Santo), the 4 northern states (Amazonas, Amapá, Pará, and Roraima) and the 9 states in the northeast of Brazil (Bahia, Sergipe, Alagoas, Pernambuco, Paraíba, Rio Grande do Norte, Ceará, Piauí, and Maranhão).

Products and Services

     Brasil Telecom GSM offers three types of plans: post-paid, pre-paid and control (a plan where clients establish a pre-determined monthly rate and buy pre-paid credits if they wish to make extra calls). Besides voice services, Brasil Telecom GSM clients can also take advantage of value-added services, including data communications via GPRS and new services previously not offered by other carriers. An example is the Mobile Banking service, the result of a partnership between Brasil Telecom GSM and Banco do Brasil that allows clients to access account balances and statements, and make transfers, among other services.

38


Table of Contents

Clients

     At the end of 2004, Brasil Telecom GSM had 622,3002.2 million clients, which represented a 3.2%an 8.7% market-share gained in only three monthsRegion II, an increase of operations. 33.1%255.6% from the prior year, with 31.3% of the clients were post paid,in the post-paid category. A market research study conducted in July 2005 indicated that Brasil Telecom GSM has a percentage which is above15.0% market share among corporate clients. The 2005 blended average revenue per user (“ARPU”) was R$27.80 resulting from a pos-paid ARPU of R$41.20 and a pre-paid ARPU of R$19.60. These values reflect the market average.promotion discounts “Pula-Pula” and “Fale por Menos.”

Subscriber Acquisition Cost

     For fiscal 2005, our subscriber acquisition cost was R$209, considered to be a reasonable amount, given the excessive competition for mobile telephone clients in our Region. We expense our subscriber acquisition costs as incurred as opposed to capitalizing them and expensing them over time, a common practice for other operators.

Investments in our Infrastructure

     In 2005, investments in our infrastructure totaled R$441.3 million. This amount includes disbursements to network implementation, IT equipments and platforms, installation of twenty stores, pre-operational costs realized until October 2004 and the acquisition of an additional 900 MHz license to improve the quality of data and voice services offered to our clients.

Investments in Coverage

     The Brasil Telecom GSM network covers 626 localities and 81.2%In 2005, we implemented 156 new wireless facilities, for a total of 782 facilities as of December 31, 2005, covering 85.9% of the population of the states ofin Region II. Around 2,000 new towers were implemented during 2004. In 2005, newaddition, we have made infrastructure investments are expectedin many locations in order to further broaden ourimprove the signal quality and provide coverage to indoor locations, such as shopping malls, stadiums and increase the number of localities covered as well as the main highways that link the regions, enabling our clients to fully benefit from the mobility concept.other public locations.

Integration

     Integration

     TheOur Brasil Telecom GSM sales team works in partnership with the Brasil Telecom commercial business areaareas of the rest of our Group to offer all the group's productto our wireless telephone clients our entire portfolio of products and address the necessitiesneeds of our clients within Region II.

     Points of Sales

     InAs of December 2004,31, 2005, Brasil Telecom GSM had 2,1093,258 points of sale, including 1620 flagship stores, 4854 kiosks, 8001,129 exclusive authorized dealers, and1,979 non-exclusive authorized sales agents, and 1,30076 pre-paid card resellers amongresellers.

Employees

     Brasil Telecom GSM had 1,069 employees at the main retailers.end of December, 2005, dedicated to commercial area, new business and planning and management sales. Our employees are trained to recognize and implement synergies across the various services and products that are offered by our numerous platforms.

51


Table of Contents

Our Region

     Until January 2004, we were authorized by our original concessions to provide fixed-line telecommunications service only in nine states of Brazil located in the western, central and southern regions of Brazil, and in the Federal District, as listed in the chart below, excluding small areas in the States of Goiás, Mato Grosso do Sul and Paraná, which we refer to as our region. We have a unique advantage in this region as we inherited the telecommunications business in this region upon privatization of Telebrás. Since we received certification that we had met our universalization targets, weWe are now authorized to provide interregional long-distance services throughout Brazil, and international long-distance services also from any point in the country. We also received authorization to offerBrazil, local services out of our original concession area and to offer wireless services in our region. Our primary source of revenues continues to come from operations in our region.

     The states in our region, Region II, cover an area of approximately 2.852.8 million square kilometers, representing 33.5%33% of the country's total area and generating 26.1%approximately 27% of Brazil's Gross Domestic Product ("GDP"). The estimated population of our region was approximately 41.544 million, representing 23.5%approximately 24% of the population of Brazil. Our region has four metropolitan areas with populations in excess of one million inhabitants, including Brasilia, the capital of Brazil.

     The following table sets forth certain key economic data for the states in our region.

    Population  Percentage of  Per capita 
  Population  per square  Brazil's GDP  income (R$) 
State  (millions)(1)  kilometer(1)  for 2002(1)  for 2002(1) 
     
Paraná  9.9  49.59  6.05  8,241 
Santa Catarina  5.6  58.63  3.85  9,272 
Distrito Federal  2.2  375.78  2.65  16,361 
Tocantins  1.2  4.36  0.26  2,931 
Mato Grosso  2.6  2.92  1.33  6,773 
Mato Grosso do Sul  2.2  6.06  1.14  7,092 
Rondônia  1.5  6.33  0.54  4,843 
Rio Grande do Sul  10.5  37.23  7.76  9,958 

39


Table of Contents

    Population  Percentage of   Per capita 
  Population  per square  Brazil's GDP  income (R$) 
State  (millions)(1)  kilometer(1)     for 2002(1)   for 2002(1) 
     
Acre       0.6  3.86       0.17  3,833 
Goiás       5.3  15.54       2.33  5,921 

(1)     Source: Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e EstatísticaIBGE("IBGE") pursuant to the 2002 Regional Accounts of Brazil.

     Set forth below is a map of Brazil showing the location of our region.


Our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects depend on the performance of the Brazilian economy and the economy of our region, in particular.

     The following table sets forth certain key economic data for the states in our region in 2002, the date of Brazil’s most recent Civil Register census.

    Population  Percentage of  Per capita 
  Population  per square  Brazil's GDP  income (R$)
State  (millions)(1) kilometer(1) for 2002(1) for 2002(1)
     
Paraná  9.9  49.59  6.05  8,241 
Santa Catarina  5.6  58.63  3.85  9,272 
Distrito Federal  2.2  375.78  2.65  16,361 
Tocantins  1.2  4.36  0.26  2,931 
Mato Grosso  2.6  2.92  1.33  6,773 
Mato Grosso do Sul  2.2  6.06  1.14  7,092 
Rondônia  1.5  6.33  0.54  4,843 
Rio Grande do Sul  10.5  37.23  7.76  9,958 
Acre  0.6  3.86  0.17  3,833 
Goiás  5.3  15.54  2.33  5,921 

(1)Source: Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística("IBGE"), pursuant to the 2002 Regional Accounts of Brazil.

52


Table of Contents

          Set forth below is a map of Brazil showing the location of our region.


Seasonality

Our main activity, which is to provide fixed-line telecommunications services, is generally not affected by seasonal variations.

Targets Established by Anatel Applicable to Us

     We are required to achieve certain targets established by Anatel and required under the terms and conditions of our concessions, in connection with the quality and universalization of our services.

Quality Targets

     We are required, pursuantPursuant to the Telecommunications Regulations and our concession contracts, we are required to meet certain service quality targets relating to call completion rates, repair requests, rate of response to repair requests, operator response periods and other aspects of our telecommunications services. Noncompliance with these quality

40


Table of Contents

targets can result in certain fines. See "—History and Development of the Company—Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry—Obligations of Telecommunications Companies—Quality of Service—General Plan on Quality."

53


Table of Contents

     The following table indicates the individual performance of each of our concessions in accomplishing their respective quality of service obligations as of December 31, 2004.2005.

Quality Performance of Services measured on December 31, 2004    
                       
             Tele-             
  Teleacre   Teleron  Telemat  Telegoías   brasília  Telems  Telepar   Telesc   CRT  Pelotas  Target 
             
                       

Rate of completed originated local calls – Morning

 70.35  70.29  70.37  70.43  70.13  71.60  71.61  71.24  71.27  71.42  70.0 

Rate of completed originated local calls – Afternoon

 70.75  70.19  70.93  70.14  70.21  72.51  71.60  70.86  71.01  71.31  70.0 

Rate of completed originated local calls – Night

 72.74  70.36  71.80  70.75  70.34  71.61  70.42  70.45  70.07  70.71  70.0 

Rate of completed originated DLD calls – Morning

 73.09  70.32  71.55  71.10  70.28  71.17  73.34  73.05  70.80  72.56  70.0 

Rate of completed originated DLD calls – Afternoon

 70.17  70.89  72.39  71.92  71.39  70.80  73.33  72.83  70.62  70.89  70.0 

Rate of completed originated DLD calls – Night

 72.78  70.91  73.02  72.24  70.28  70.72  71.30  70.26  70.48  70.14  70.0 

Rate of amount of repair requests per 100 accesses in service – Integral

 1.09  1.20  1.27  1.39  1.27  1.20  1.35  1.78  1.30  1.35  2.0 

Rate of amount of repair requests per 100 public telephones – Integral

 4.15  5.72  9.49  9.97  9.98  8.84  6.80  6.30  5.87  3.94  10.0 

Response rate for user telephones of the STFC within 10 seconds – Morning .

 99.32  99.68  99.36  99.46  99.85  99.35  99.76  99.88  99.88  100  94.0 

Response rate for user telephones of the STFC within 10 seconds – Afternoon

 98.03  99.11  99.24  99.30  99.79  98.89  99.64  99.50  99.68  99.46  94.0 

Response rate for user telephones of the STFC within 10 seconds – Night

 99.31  99.59  99.50  99.57  99.91  99.57  99.87  99.60  99.71  99.70  94.0 

Amounts of bills with complaints of errors in every 1,000 bills issued – local mode

 1.91  1.94  1.96  1.94  1.98  1.94  1.93  1.95  1.97  1.93  2.0 

Amounts of bills with complaints of errors in every 1,000 bills issued – DLD mode

 1.64  1.88  1.72  1.76  1.59  1.74  1.80  1.55  1.23  1.69  2.0 

Rate of claimed inaccurate bills with credit issued (for each 100 bills) for the local mode – Integral

 100  100  100  100  100  100  100  100  100  100  97.0 

Rate of originated DLD calls not completed due to traffic jam – Morning

 3.26  1.39  1.78  1.74  2.57  1.72  1.64  1.80  1.27  1.52  4.0 

Rate of originated DLD calls not completed due to traffic jam – Afternoon

 3.90  1.91  2.24  1.84  2.54  2.06  1.86  1.60  1.52  1.76  4.0 

Rate of originated DLD calls not completed due to traffic jam – Night

 1.81  1.70  1.68  1.75  2.91  1.58  1.59  1.76  1.89  1.98  4.0 

Rate of originated local calls not completed due to traffic jam – Morning

 3.09  0.57  1.27  1.03  1.55  1.26  0.59  1.19  0.58  0.48  4.0 

41

      Quality Performance of Services measured on December 31, 2005  
                       
          Tele-             
  Teleacre  Teleron  Telemat  Telegoías  brasília  Telems  Telepar  Telesc  CRT  Pelotas  Target 
            
Rate of completed originated                       
   local calls – Morning  77.29  77.41  71.43  71.60  70.37  71.32  72.44  70.79  72.07  72.54  70.0 
Rate of completed originated                       
   local calls – Afternoon  82.87  79.30  72.02  72.34  71.15  71.89  72.21  71.19  72.25  73.50  70.0 
Rate of completed originated                       
   local calls – Night  84.37  84.75  70.59  70.72  72.01  62.51  70.14  69.95  71.22  72.38  70.0 
Rate of completed originated                       
   DLD calls – Morning  87.89  77.86  72.36  71.58  72.94  73.45  73.20  73.17  71.91  73.87  70.0 
Rate of completed originated                       
   DLD calls – Afternoon  82.81  80.05  72.20  72.00  74.82  74.14  72.23  73.46  72.00  72.75  70.0 
Rate of completed originated                       
   DLD calls – Night  81.37  80.39  70.71  71.64  70.51  56.05  69.70  70.06  71.55  72.24  70.0 
Rate of amount of repair requests                       
   per 100 accesses in service –                       
   Integral  1.48  1.39  1.62  1.26  1.24  1.03  1.12  1.23  1.40  0.83  2.0 
Rate of amount of repair requests                       
   per 100 public telephones –                       
   Integral  1.23  2.73  5.04  6.95  7.18  4.13  3.91  2.47  2.78  1.71  10.0 
Response rate for user                       
   telephones of the PSTN within                       
   10 seconds – Morning  99.87  99.44  98.92  99.06  99.29  98.89  99.60  90.94  93.58  94.02  94.0 
Response rate for user                       
   telephones of the PSTN within                       
   10 seconds – Afternoon  99.69  99.60  98.85  98.61  99.41  99.43  99.56  99.50  99.59  99.78  94.0 
Response rate for user                       
   telephones of the PSTN within                       
   10 seconds – Night  99.76  99.76  98.97  99.35  99.62  91.35  99.87  99.58  99.67  100  94.0 
Amounts of bills with                       
   complaints of errors in every                       
   1,000 bills issued – local                       
   mode  1.98  1.97  2.02  1.97  1.98  1.98  2.06  1.96  1.98  1.96  2.0 
Amounts of bills with                       
   complaints of errors in every                       
   1,000 bills issued – DLD                       
   mode  1.98  1.80  1.99  1.98  1.65  1.82  1.86  1.56  1.73  2.04  2.0 
Rate of claimed inaccurate bills                       
   with credit issued (for each                       
   100 bills) for the local mode –                       
   Integral  100  100  100  100  100  100  100  100  100  100  97.0 
Rate of originated DLD calls not                       
   completed due to traffic jam –                       
   Morning  1.24  1.11  1.25  1.32  1.66  1.27  1.18  1.37  0.84  1.17  4.0 
Rate of originated DLD calls not                       
   completed due to traffic jam –                       
   Afternoon  1.06  1.28  1.32  1.29  1.43  1.33  1.46  1.37  0.89  2.30  4.0 
Rate of originated DLD calls not                       
   completed due to traffic jam –                       
   Night  1.04  1.31  1.84  1.88  1.79  18.40  1.44  1.68  1.02  0.80  4.0 
Rate of originated local calls not                       
   completed due to traffic jam –                       
   Morning  0.61  0.54  0.77  0.78  0.65  0.55  0.60  1.14  0.54  0.23  4.0 
Rate of originated local calls not                       
   completed due to traffic jam –                       
   Afternoon  0.54  0.64  0.81  0.83  0.77  0.62  0.99  0.86  0.56  0.19  4.0 
Rate of originated local calls not                       
   completed due to traffic jam –                       
   Night  0.42  0.68  1.43  1.49  0.49  6.84  0.73  1.25  0.64  0.25  4.0 
Response rate to repair requests                       
   made by residential users in                       
   up to 24 hours – Integral  100  98.32  99.68  99.61  99.63  99.90  99.42  99.90  99.61  99.27  97.0 
Response rate to repair requests                       
   made by non-residential users                       
   in up to 8 hours – Integral  100  98.30  99.27  99.39  99.89  99.33  99.24  99.78  99.50  99.21  97.0 
Response rate to repair requests                       
   made for public telephones in                       
   up to 8 hours – Integral  100  97.16  99.54  99.56  99.87  100  99.38  98.53  99.84  100  97.0 
Response rate to address change                       
   requests from residential users                       
   in up to 3 business days –                       
   Integral  100  100  99.91  99.65  99.96  99.73  99.98  99.67  99.84  100  97.0 
Response rate to address change                       
   requests from non residential                       
   users in up to 24 hours –                       
   Integral  100  97.73  99.76  99.37  100  99.48  99.50  99.01  99.46  100  97.0 

54


Table of Contents

Quality Performance of Services measured on December 31, 2004    
                       
             Tele-             
  Teleacre   Teleron  Telemat  Telegoías   brasília  Telems  Telepar   Telesc   CRT  Pelotas  Target 
             

Rate of originated local calls not completed due to traffic jam – Afternoon

 0.75  0.70  1.03  2.27  2.84  1.14  0.70  1.54  0.86  0.40  4.0 

Rate of originated local calls not completed due to traffic jam – Night

 1.14  2.06  1.23  2.06  1.38  2.30  0.77  1.90  2.53  0.69  4.0 

Response rate to repair requests made by residential users in up to 24 hours – Integral

 99.60  98.91  99.72  99.49  99.25  99.84  99.53  99.30  99.09  99.47  97.0 

Response rate to repair requests made by non-residential users in up to 8 hours – Integral

 97.67  97.39  98.83  99.07  98.76  99.62  99.07  97.54  97.75  100  97.0 

Response rate to repair requests made for public telephones in up to 8 hours – Integral

 98.19  97.95  99.63  99.13  97.99  99.13  98.55  99.15  98.00  100  97.0 

Response rate to address change requests from residential users in up to 3 business days – Integral

 100  99.78  99.84  99.79  99.81  99.91  99.90  99.92  99.35  99.40  97.0 

Response rate to address change requests from non residential users in up to 24 hours –
Integral

 100  97.22  100  99.20  99.42  100  99.22  99.45  97.78  100  97.0 



Universalization – Network Expansion

     We are also required under the Telecommunications Regulations and our concessions to meet certain targets relating to network expansion and modernization. See "—History and Development of the Company—Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry—Obligations of Telecommunications Companies—Network Expansion—General Plan on Universal Service."

     During 2004,2005, all our universalization targets of the General Plan on Universal Service were met.

     The following table below indicates certain of our obligations relating to the expansion of our network in 20042005 and our performance in accomplishingsatisfying those obligations as of December 31, 2004.2005.

   Targets at  Company status at 
  December 31, 2004  December 31, 2004 
   
Fixed-line service available to all communities larger than     
   (inhabitants)     600     Obligation met 
At least one public phone available to all communities     
   larger than (inhabitants)   300  Obligation met 
Maximum waiting time for installation of a line (weeks)(1)  Obligation met 
Minimum number of public telephones in service     
   (thousands)  216  296 
Minimum number of public telephones (per 1,000     
   inhabitants)   7.5   8.3 
Minimum public telephones as a percentage of fixed lines 2.5  2.8 
  Targets at  Company status at 
  December 31, 2005  December 31, 2005 
   
Fixed-line service available to all communities larger than     
   (inhabitants) 300  Obligation met 
At least one public phone available to all communities larger     
   than (inhabitants) 100  Obligation met 
Maximum waiting time for installation of a line (weeks)(1)  Obligation met 
Minimum number of public telephones in service (thousands) 216  296.9 
Minimum number of public telephones (per 1,000 inhabitants) 7.5  8.1 
Minimum public telephones as a percentage of fixed lines  2.5  2.7 
 
(1)   Applies only to areas where fixed-line service is fully available.   

(1)     Applies only to areas where fixed-line service is fully available.

42


Table of Contents

Our Rates

     For basic plans, our concessions establish a mechanism of annual rate adjustment, based on rate baskets and the use of the IGP-DI price index. Two rate baskets are defined, one for local services (local basket) and one for long-distance services (DLD basket). The rates for the provision of services through payphones and the rates for address change are treated separately.

55


Table of Contents

     The adjustment index considers the IGP-DI price index variation, discounting the pre-established productivity factor in the Concession Contract. Within each basket, the rates have a cap price, which can be adjusted up to a percentage above the established index (up to 9.0% higher for the local basket and up to 5.0% higher for the DLD basket). However, the application of a higher index to one of the items in the basket will require a balancing of the remaining items so as not to exceed the established limit for such basket.

     The local basket includes activation fees (activation of the terminal), basic subscriptions and local pulse, and represents the weighted average of these rates. The national long-distance basket includes all different prices for calls, which vary according to the distance and the time of connection.

     On the adjustment dates for the local and DLD baskets, the rate adjustments for network useusage rate are also approved. These rates apply when our networks are used by other telecommunications carriers.

     The maximum adjustment indexes allowed for the baskets within the period of 19992000 to 20042005 are as follows:

 1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005 
            
Local Basket  7.9%  14.2%  10.4%  8.3%  16.0%  6.89%  14.2%  10.4%  8.3%  16.0%  6.9%  7.3% 
DLD Basket  5.4%  11.9%  7.7%  4.9%  12.5%  3.20%  11.9%  7.7%  4.9%  12.5%  3.2%  2.9% 

     On June 30, 2004,July 01, 2005, Anatel authorized an increase in rates based on the IGP-DI index, in connection with local and long distance services and network usage, as provided for in our concession contract. These rate increases were equal to an average of 6.9%7.3% on local services and 3.2%2.9% on domestic long distance services. The maximum raterates for the international long distance Basic Plan wascalls were increased by 8.0% 8.4% (basic plan).

     On July 1, 2004, the Superior Court of Brazil ("STJ") suspended the preliminary injunction that stipulated the IPCA index (Índice de Preços ao Consumidor Amplo) as a substituteThe Renewal of the IGP-DIConcession Contracts also established what parameters will be used to the adjustment rates. In 2006, the Telecommunication Industry Index (“IST”), created by Anatel as an index basket of existing public prices, became the official index to measure sector inflation and adjust rates. For 2006 and 2007, the agency also elaborated a calculus model to the Transference Factor in concession contracts asorder to reduce the base for rate adjustments in 2003, determining that rates werereadjustment levels to be adjusted based onpass part of the IGP-DI index, as foreseen by concession contracts.

     Fixed-line telephony service providers, in negotiation with Anatel, agreedproductivity gains obtained from the companies to apply the rate adjustment in two installments, effective on September 01, 2004 and on November 01, 2004, as shown below:users.

                     Service Plan  Average Rate  Average Rate   
  Adjustment on Adjustment on Total Average 
   Sep 01, 2004   Nov 01, 2004  Rate Adjustment 
    
Local Basic  4.35%  4.17%  8.52% 
Domestic Long Distance Basic  4.78%  4.56%  9.34% 
Local Network Usage Rate  5.46%  5.18%  10.64% 
Intercity Network Usage Rate  5.46%  5.18%  10.64% 

Local Rates

     Our revenue from local services derives from fees charged for service access, service availability, service usage and change of address.

An activation fee is applied for service access and consists solely of a charge paid when terminals are activated.

43


Table of Contents

     The monthly subscription charge is the amount paid for the availability of fixed switched telephone service, regardless of utilization. There are three types of monthly subscriptions, depending on the category of the terminal, which can be residential, non-residential or trunk. Payment of this charge includes 100 free pulses per month for residential clients and 90 free pulses per month for remaining clients (non-residential and trunk). Any pulses in excess of such amounts are billed to the customer as a measured service.

     Since November 1, 2004,July 3, 2005, the date of the last rate adjustment, average monthly subscription charges (net of taxes) have been R$25.5427.39 for residential customers, R$36.7139.47 for non-residential customers, and R$24.4730.19 for trunk customers.

     Users of measured service pay for local calls depending on usage, which is measured in pulses. Pulses occur system widesystemwide every four minutes for local calls. These system-wide pulsesand are recorded independently of when the individual calls are actually made. In addition to system-wide pulses, the system records one pulse for every call when the call is connected. After the first pulse, only system-wide pulses are used in determining the charge for a call. As a result, the time between the first and the second (system-wide) pulse may vary. For example, for a call being charged using four-minute pulse increments, the time between the first pulse and the second (system-wide) pulse may vary between one second and four minutes.

56


Table of Contents

     Local call charges for calls made on weekdays between 6:00 a.m. and 12:00 a.m. and on Saturdays between 6:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m., are determined by multiplying the number of pulses by the charge per pulse. For calls being made any weekday and on Saturdays between midnight and 6:00 a.m., on Saturdays between 2:00 p.m. and midnight and all day on Sundays and holidays, a caller is charged for only one pulse regardless of the duration of the call.

     Since the last rate adjustment, on November 1, 2004,July 3, 2005, the average pulse charge (net of taxes) has been of R$0.10294.0.11042.

     The following table sets forth selected information regarding our subscription charges and measured service charges for local telephone services for the periods indicated.

  Year ended December 31, 
  
  2002  2003   2004 
    
Average rates for local telephone service(1)  (reais) 
   Monthly subscription:       
         Residential   18.92               22.18  25.54 
         Commercial   24.80               29.08  36.71 
   Measured service (per local pulse)  0.07624   0.08938  0.10294 

________________________________________
(1)     Average rates, net of taxes.
  Year ended December 31 
  
  2003  2004  2005 
    
Average rates for local telephone service(1)   (reais)  
Monthly subscription:       
     Residential  22.2  25.5  27.4 
     Commercial  29.1  36.7  39.5 
Measured service (per local pulse) 0.08938  0.10294  0.11042 
 
(1) Average rates, net of taxes.

     SinceIn addition to the date ofaverage pulse charge, since the last rate adjustment which occurred on November 1, 2004,July 3, 2005, we chargehave been charging an activation fee for a new line, net of taxes, between R$3.473.93 and R$73.4280.52 (depending on the state) and a fee of R$78.46, net84.16 (net of taxes,taxes) when a subscriber changes his/her address.

Domestic Long-Distance Rates

     Domestic long-distance, or DLD, calls between fixed-line telephones are measured by the duration of the call and registered in the telephone bill call by call. The value per minute is defined by the distance involved (rate degrees from one to four), the day of the week and the time of the call. The measurement is based on a rate unit of one tenth of a minute (six seconds) and the minimum billable time is one minute.

44


Table of Contentsthirty seconds.

     The following table sets forth selected information regarding our domestic long-distance rates during the periods indicated.

 Year ended December 31, 
  Year ended December, 31 
  2002   2003   2004  
    2003  2004  2005 
Domestic long-distance rates(1):  (reais) 
   
Domestic long distance rates(1)   (reais)  
0 to 50 km  0.50   0.59  0.62  0.59  0.62  0.63 
50 to 100 km  0.73   0.82  0.90  0.82  0.90  0.93 
100 to 300 km  0.85   0.95  1.05  0.95  1.05  1.08 
Over 300 km  1.12  1.15  1.13  1.15  1.13  1.16 

(1)     Average rates for a domestic long-distance call (interstate), three minutes in duration between the hours of 9 a.m. and noon and 2 p.m. and 6 p.m. (peak hours) on weekdays, net of taxes.

Network Usage Charges

     The network usage rates, responsible for a large part of our interconnection revenue, are applied in the following situations:

57


Table of Contents

     The Local Network Usage Rate (Tarifa de Uso de Rede Local - TU-RL), or “TU-RL”) is applied when third parties use our local network to complete their calls. When third parties use our long-distance network the Intercity Network Usage Rate (Tarifa(Tarifa de Uso de Rede Interurbana - TU-RIU), or “TU-RIU”) is applied.

     The following table sets forth the average per-minute rates that we charged for network services during the indicated years.

  Year ended December 31, 
  
  2002 2003 2004
    
  (reais)(1) 
Network usage rate (local)  0.0512   0.05284  0.05248 
Network usage rate (long-distance)  0.0860   0.09681  0.11083 
________________________________________
  Year ended December, 31 
  
  2003  2004  2005 
    
    (reais)(1)  
Network usage rate (local) 0.05284  0.05248  0.04548 
Network usage rate (long-distance) 0.09681  0.11083  0.11408 

(1)     Net of taxes.

     As of July 3, 2005, the date of the last rate adjustment, on November 1, 2004, network usage rates for local and long-distance services were approximately R$0.052480.04548 and R$0.11083,0.11408, respectively. The adjustment of rates for network usage in 2004,2005, considering the indexes authorized by Anatel on June 30, 2004 and adding the differences in connection with the 2003 rate adjustment, which were suspended by the STJ and were applied in September and November 2004 after a new court ruling,July 1, 2005, was of approximately -0.7%-13.33% for the Local Network Usage Rate and 14.5%2.94% for the Intercity Network Usage Rate.

     Our revenue from network services also includes payments from other telecommunications service providers arrangedoperators based on a contractual basisspecific agreements to use part ofshare our network.network and other structure. Other telecommunications service providers,

45


Table of Contents

such as providers of trunking and paging services, may use our network to connect a central switching station to our network. Some mobile service providers use our network to connect mobile central switching stations to the mobile radio base stations. We also lease transmission lines, certain infrastructure and other equipment to other providers of telecommunications services.

     The maximum values for the Local Network Usage Rate (“TU-RL”) will be limited to the product of the M multiplier by the Local Network Usage Rate used. From January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006, the value of M will be 0.5. This change will lead to a reduction in TU-RL from R$0.050 to an average value of R$0.035 in January 2006.

Fixed-Mobile Rates

     Wireless telecommunications services in Brazil, unlike in North America, are offered on a "calling party pays" basis. Under this policy, a cellular servicemobile subscriber generally pays cellularmobile usage charges only for calls made by the cellular servicesuch subscriber and not for calls received. In addition, a subscriber pays roaming charges on calls made or received outside his or her home registration area. Calls received by a cellular service subscriber are paid for by the party that places the call in accordance with a rate based on cellular per-minute charges.rate. For example, a fixed-line service customer pays a rate based on cellular per-minute chargesphone has specific rates for calls made to a cellular service subscriber. The cellular base rate per-minute chargesother mobile users. These mobile rates are generally VC-1 (Communicationdivided in Communication Value – 1)1, or VC-1, for local calls, VC-2 (CommunicationCommunication Value – 2)2, or VC-2, for calls outside the cellular subscriber's registration area but still inside the region where the respective cellular provideroperator provides service, (Communicationand Communication Value – 3)3, or VC-3, for calls outside the subscriber's registration area and outside the region where the respective cellular provideroperator provides service.

     We charge our fixed-line service customersfixed-mobile calls based on per-minute charges, based on either VC-1, VC-2, or VC-3 rates, when a fixed-line service customer calls a cellularmobile subscriber. In turn, we pay the cellular service provider a mobile network usage charge for such calls. For local calls, the VC-1 is applied, and for national long-distance calls, the VC-2 and VC-3 rates are applied. Local calls where VC-1 is applied, are included in our local services revenues,

58


Table of Contents

while intraregional calls where VC-2 or VC-3 are applied are included in our intraregional and long distance service revenues.

     The criteria for measurement of these calls are defined in the Concession Contract and have the following rules:

     Like the local and DLD basket rates, rates for calls involving mobile telephones are set in the Concession Contract and are adjusted annually based on IGP-DI price index, after approval by Anatel. The month of reference for the adjustment is February.

     DuringAt the same month, the valuestime, rates for mobile network use (VU-M)(“VU-M”) are also readjusted and are used to determine the amount that the fixed-line carriers will have to pay per minute, after the execution offor fixed-mobile calls, of the fixed-mobile type, whether in local range (VC-1) or in national long-distance range.range (VC-2 and VC-3).

     Since July 6, 2003, by determination of Anatel,through regulation changes, mobile telephone customers canmust choose, via the carrier selection code, the DLD carrier they prefer to complete their calls, following the same system adopted by the fixed telephonytelephone sector. With the introduction of this new system, the DLD carriers began to take part in this new market.

     In February 2004, the VU-MOn June 12, 2005, VC-1 was readjusted, on average, by 9.2% in our concession area and the VC-1, VC-2 and VC-3 rates were adjusted by 7.0% .

     On April 7, 2005, Anatel announced that the VC-1 rate was to be adjusted by 7.99%, pendingwhile the approval of Anatel's board of directors. Also according to the announcement, Anatel expects mobile and fixed-lineVU-M (for local calls, VC-1) was adjusted by 4.5% . However, operators todid not reach an agreement regarding the VU-M rate. Anatel didto adjust VC2 and VC-3, and, as a consequence, these rates have not approve the adjustments for the VC-2 or VC-3 rates.

46


Table of Contentschanged.

     The following table sets forth the average per-minute rates that we charged for fixed-to-mobile services during the indicated years.

 Year ended December 31,  Year ended December, 31 
  
 2002(1)  2003  2004  2003  2004  2005 
      
  (reais)    (reais)(1)  
VC-1  0.335  0.414  0.443  0.414  0.443  0.479 
VC-2  0.694   0.847  0.906  0.847  0.906  0.906 
VC-3  0.764   0.932  0.997  0.932  0.997  0.997 

(1)     Net of Taxes.
taxes.

Data Transmission Rates

     The majorityMost of revenue fromour data transmission services is generatedrevenues are obtained by monthly line rental chargesfees charged for private leased circuits. The balance consistsThese revenues consist mainly of nominal charges for access to the data transmission networknetworks and measured service charges based onusage related to the amount of data transmitted. The following table sets forth selected information about our average monthly line rental charges for private leased circuits during the indicated years.

 Year ended December 31, 
  Year ended December 31, 
 2002  2003  2004  
    2003  2004  2005 
   (reais)      
Average rates for monthly line rental per leased circuit:          (reais)  
Local circuit             
4.8 Kbps  254.75  302.00  302.00  302.00  302.00  302.00 
9.6 Kbps  254.75  302.00  302.00  302.00  302.00  302.00 
64Kbps  523.74  586.00  586.00 
2Mbps  6,635.45  6,636.00  6,636.00 
64 Kbps  586.00  586.00  586.00 
2 Mbps  6,636.00  6,636.00  6,636.00 
  
Long-distance circuit(1)             
4.8 Kbps  1,094.93  1,303.00  1,303.00  1,303.00  1,303.00  1,303.00 
9.6 Kbps  1,094.93  1,303.00  1,303.00  1,303.00  1,303.00  1,303.00 
64Kbps  2,961.79  3,317.00  3,317.00 
2Mbps  37,565.23  37,566.00  37,566.00 
64 Kbps  3,317.00  3,317.00  3,317.00 
2 Mbps  37,566.00  37,566.00  37,566.00 

(1)     Average ofMaximum rates, net of taxes, assuming a transmission distance between 300 and 500 kilometers and a three- year contract.
kilometers.

59


Table of Contents

     The table below sets forth the rates that we charged for ADSL services.services in 2005. These costs do not include the fees normally paid by customers to their Internet service providers.ISP’s. The portfolio was changed in 2006 with higher speeds and a new product for games, called “Turbo Jogos.”

Residential Plans Downstream/Upstream Speed Monthly Subscription(1)
 
Turbo Lite Up to 150 Kbps/Up to 64 Kbps 49.90(2)
Turbo 300400 Up to 300400 Kbps/Up to 150200 Kbps 79.90 
Turbo 600 Up to 600 Kbps/Up to 300 Kbps 99.00 
Mega Turbo 800Up to 800 Kbps/Up to 300 Kbps 118,99 
Turbo Jogos 600Up to 600 Kbps/Up to 512 Kbps 108,99 
Turbo Jogos 1000 Up to 1.0 Mbps/Up to 300512 Kbps 199.00219,99 
 
Corporate Plans Downstream/Upstream Speed Monthly Subscription(1)
 
Rápido Up to 400 Kbps/Up to 200 Kbps 119.90 
Super Rápido Up to 800 Kbps/Up to 400 Kbps 253.12 
Profissional Up to 1.5 Mbps/Up to 256 Kbps 593.44 

(1)    
Monthly rates inreais, including taxes.
(2)    Monthly value for 50 hours of Internet access. Additional hours are charged R$2,952.95 per hour.
 

47


Table of Contents

Wireless Rates

     Our authorization establishes a price-cap mechanism of annual rate adjustment, based on the IGP-DI price index for basic and alternative plans. The price-cap is a weighted average price for the services offered in our Basic Plan, including monthly subscription and particular roaming charges, such as toll per call and local minute-basis tariffs.

     However, tariffs and prices for value-added services, such as data communications services, are not subject to regulation and can be defined on a competitive basis. Such services are offered as pay-per-use or volume-based packages.

     The Basic Plan follows a post-paid system, whereby clients pay a monthly charge for the availability of mobile services, regardless of utilization. In addition to this charge, subscribers are charged for the utilization of voice and data services.

60


Table of Contents

The following table sets forth selected information about the average charges for our Basic Plan in 2004:2005:

 Year ended December 31, 2004 
 31, 2005
 
Average rates for the Basic Plan(1)(reais)
     Activation 0.0023.67 
     Monthly Subscription  27.74
           Residential 27.39 
           Commercial 39.47 
     Local calls to fixed-line numbers (per local pulse)0.41380.11042 
     Local calls to Brasil Telecom GSM mobiles (per minute – normal rate) 0.41380.50504 
     Local calls to other wireless operators (perminute – normal rate)0.41380.50447 

(1)      Average rates, net of taxes.

     As of May 31, 2005, we also offered our wireless clients three different types of alternative plans,plans: theBrasil Cartão Plan, Brasil Conta Plan, theBrasil Controle Planand theBrasil CartãoControle Plan.

     TheBrasil Cartão Planfollows a pre-paid system, whereby our clients purchase credits in advance for the availability of mobile services. We offer reduced rates for either nighttime or daytime calls, withunder theBrasil Cartão Noturno Planand theBrasil Cartão Diurno Plan, respectively, or charge a single tariff regardless of the time of the call, with theBrasil Cartão Simples Plan.

     TheBrasil Conta Planfollows a post-paid system, whereby clients pay a monthly charge for a given package of inclusive minutes. Any minutes used in excess of such amounts are billed to the customer according to the selected package, so that packages with a greater amount of inclusive minutes are generally charged a lower tariff.rate. We offer 14 different packages of monthly inclusive minutes ranging from 50 to 2000 minutes. If subscribers do not use the total amount of inclusive minutes in any given month, the balance is brought forward to the following month.

     TheBrasil Controle Plan has characteristics of both pre-pre-paid and post-paid systems. Clients pay a fixed monthly charge for the availability of mobile services, regardless of utilization. Payment of this charge includes cash credits of equal amount. Once all credits have been used, subscribers may purchase extra pre-paid credits. TariffsRates charged for the plan are the same, regardless of whether the credit is post-pre-paid or pre-paid.post-paid. If subscribers do not use the total amount of cash credits in any given month, the balance is brought forward to the following month.

Taxes on Telecommunications Services

     The cost of telecommunications services in Brazil includes a variety of taxes. The principal tax is a state value-added tax, theImposto sobre Circulação de Mercadorias e Serviços ("ICMS"), which Brazilian states impose at varying rates on telecommunications services. The current average ICMS tax rate for telecommunications services is 25.0% . However, the ICMS tax rate varies between states. In the State of Acre and Mato Grosso, for example, the ICMS

48


Table of Contents

tax rate is 25.0%, while in the State of Mato Grosso the ICMS tax rate is 30.0% . In the State of Mato Grosso do Sul the ICMS tax rate is 27.0% . Inand in the State of Goiás, the ICMS tax rate is 26.0%29.0% .

     The telecommunications tax burden also includes four other federal taxes, thePrograma de Integração Social ("PIS")" andContribuição para Financiamento da Seguridade Social ("COFINS")", which are the two social contribution taxes based on our gross revenues, and theUniversal Telecommunications Service Fund("Fund("FUST") and theFund for Technical Development of Brazilian Telecommunications("FUNTTEL")., which are two telecommunication taxes based on our gross operating revenues net of certain deductions.

     PIS is applied at a 0.65% rate and COFINS is applied at a 3.0% rate for telecommunications services. Since December 2002, we have been subject to a 1.65% PIS rate for services other than telecommunications services and may be entitled to PIS credits calculated on our costs and expenses to offset the PIS due on those services. Since February 2004, we have been subject to a 7.6% COFINS rate for services other than telecommunications services and may be entitled to COFINS credits calculated on our costs and expenses to offset the COFINS due on

61


Table of Contents

those services.

The FUST and FUNTTEL are imposed on certain telecommunications services at the rates of 1.0% and 0.5%, respectively, of gross operating revenues net of certain deductions.respectively. See Item 10 "Additional“Item 10. Additional Information—Taxation—Brazilian Tax Considerations—Other Brazilian Taxes."

     In 2004,2005, we paid taxes on telecommunications services representedin the amount of approximately 28.0%28.7% of our annual operating revenues.

Billing and Collection

     We send each customer of local services, long-distance services and other services a monthly bill covering all the services provided during the prior period. We group our customers into six different monthly cycles with six different payment dates. The telephone bill itemizes long-distance calls, calls made to cellular telecommunications networks, 300, 500 and 800 services and other services such as call waiting, voice mail and call forwarding.

     For interregional and international long-distance services, customers either receive separate monthly bills from each company they use for long-distance calls or a combined bill issued by us. Customers make payments under agreements with various banks or other alternative agents by direct payment to a bank or an alternative agent, or by allowing their checking account to be debited.

     Pursuant to Brazilian law, subscribers must receive a bill at least five days before the due date. When a payment is not made by the due date, we must send the customer, 15 days after the due date, a notice informing the customer of the right to contest the debt and if payment is not made within 30 days after the due date, all outgoing service will be suspended, and the customer will only be able to receive incoming calls. If payment is not made within 45 days after the due date, we send another notice informing the customer that if payment is not made within 60 days after the due date, all services will be suspended, the contract will be cancelled and the customer's failure to pay will be reported to a credit protection agency.

     The following table sets forth information about our accounts receivable for the year ended on December 31, 2004.2005. For the discussion of provisions for past due accounts, See Item 5 "Operatingsee “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Operating Results."

 At and for the year
ended December 31, 
  
20042005 
  
Due 64.5%60.0% 
Past due – 01 to 30 days 16.4%18.6% 
Past due – 31 to 60 days 5.7%5.9% 
Past due – 61 to 90 days 3.7% 
Past due – 91 to 120 days 2.7%3.2% 
Past due – More than 120 days 7.0%8.6% 

49


Table of Contents

Network and Facilities

General

     The network is the combination of the physical and logical infrastructure which provides telecommunications services, whether it is voice, data and/or image.

Network Expansion In 2005, we took various steps to expand our voice, data and image networks.

Voice Network

     During 2004,2005, we installed 50,700expanded our voice network through the installation of 79,117 lines. As a result, as of December 31, 2004,2005, our voice network plant consisted of approximately 10.710.8 million installed lines, of which 9.59.6 million were in service. Of the lines in service at that time, approximately 67.8%63.8% were residential lines, 18.0%18.1% were

62


Table of Contents

commercial lines, 3.1% were public telephone lines and 11.1%15.0% were other.other service lines. Long-distance transmission is provided by a fiber-optic cable network and by microwave links.

     At the end of 2003, we had 9.8 million lines in service and the telephone density reached 23.4 lines in service per 100 inhabitants. At December 31, 2004, we had 9.5 million lines in service and the telephone density was 22.4 lines in service per 100 inhabitants.

The following table sets forth combined information about our voice network for the periods indicated.

 At the year ended December 31,  At the year ended December 31, 
  
 2003  2004  2004  2005 
    
Installed lines (millions)  10.7  10.7  10.7  10.8 
Lines in service (millions)  9.8  9.5  9.5  9.6 
Average lines in service for year ended (millions)  9.7  9.7  9.7  9.5 
Lines in service per 100 inhabitants  23.4  22.4  22.4  22.3 
Percentage of installed lines connected to digital       
exchanges  99.0  99.7  99.7  99.9 
Number of public telephones (thousands)  296.3  295.9  295.9  296.6 

Data NetworksNetwork

     At the endAs of 2004December 31, 2005, we had 620,4061,195,357 ADSL installed ports and 535,4571,013,893 accesses in service, which represents 253,557in excess of 1 million customers, an increase of 89.4%, or 478,436 new ADSL accesses added, in 2004. This represents an 89.9% growth from the 281,900 accesses in service in 2003, and a growth in the ratio of active customers to 86.3% in 2004when compared to 81.4% in 2003.the previous year. During 20042005, we also increased the ADSL number of cities with ADSL services from 3231,117 to 1,117.1,256. The following table sets forth combined information about out data network for the periods indicated.

  Year ended December 31,   Year ended December 31 
   
 2003  2004  % Change  2004  2005  % Change 
      
ADSL             
Installed Ports  346,233  620,406  79.2  620,406  1,195,357  92.7 
Accesses in Service  281,900  535,457  89.9  535,457  1,013,893  89.4 

     ATM, Frame Relay, and Dedicated IP, expanded by 5.7%25.8% in 20042005 compared to 2003.2004. As of December 31, 2004,2005, we had installed 10,82913.619 ATM, Frame Relay or Dedicated IP ports, in 87 cities.ports. The DialNet service increased from 150,174192,236 ports installed at the end of 2003,2004, to 192,236197,244 ports installed in 239 cities at the end of 2004,2005, representing an increase of 28.0%2.6% . The following table sets forth combined information about our ATM, Frame Relay and Dedicated IP networks for the periods indicated.

50


Table of Contents

   Year ended December 31,   
   
  2003  2004  % Change 
    
       
DialNet   150,174  192,236  28.0 
ATM / Frame  Relay  /       
Dedicated IP  10,245  10,829  5.7 
  Year ended December 31 
  
  2004  2005  % Change 
    
DialNet  192,236  197,244  2.6 
ATM / Frame Relay / Dedicated IP  10,829  13,619  25.8 

     The ratio offollowing table sets forth certain information about our active customers in the several data communications networks are in the following table:networks.

  Aggregate value until December 2004 
  Total number of ports  Total ports in service  Utilization rate (%) 
    
RAS (DialNet)  192,236  157,692  82.0 
ATM/Frame Relay (Cisco Network)  8,544  6,494  76.0 
SLDD, EILD and Frame Relay       
(Deterministic Network)  38,617  27,846  72.1 
Dedicated IP / IP Light (Access routers)  2,285  1,432  62.7 

63


Table of Contents
  Aggregate value as of December 31, 2005 
  
  Total number of ports  Total ports in service  Utilization rate (%)
    
RAS (DialNet) 197,244  168,612  85.5 
ATM/Frame Relay (Cisco Network) 9,932  8,480  85.4 
SLDD, EILD and Frame Relay       
(Deterministic Network) 41,976  32,557  77.6 
Dedicated IP / IP Light (Access routers) 3,687  2,441  66.2 

GSMMobile Network

     Brasil Telecom initiated the implementation of its GSM network duringDuring the second quarter of 2004, we initiated the implementation of our mobile network with the challenge to implementof implementing an extensive GSMmobile network from the state of Acre to the state of Rio Grande do Sul, in a very short period of time, using the most advanced wireless technology available worldwide and integratedwhile simultaneously integrating the network into one of the largest wireline networks of Brazil.

     The project planning and the implementation of thisOur new mobile network took into considerationincorporates the following assumptions:network characteristics:

GSM Technology 1,800/900MHz for voice;
GPRS/EDGE Technology for Data;
Technological evolution guaranty;
Unique Voice Core distributed in an initial topology of 3 MSCs organized regionally according to the traffic interest of each region;
Two HLRs, geographically separated, assuring security and flexibility;
Unique Data Core, fully integrated to the fixed-line data network of Brasil Telecom;
Access network originally distributed through 615 localities covered by 1700 Radio Base Stations;
GPRS coverage in 100% of the localities covered;
Full integration with the existing transmission resources of the Brasil Telecom wireline network;
Intensive sharing of the existing wireline infrastructure of Brasil Telecom and other wireless operators in the market;
Integration with Brasil Telecom fixed-line platforms, leveraging technical/operational synergies between companies.

Network Modernization

     With respect to ourOur network infrastructure we applyapplies an operatingoperational model based on operating efficiency, which usesdesigned to use cutting-edge technological resources to assureefficiently provide flexibility and quality services for our users.

In 2005, we underwent significant modifications and improvements in our network infrastructure in order to provide a more efficient service to our customers. The improvements in our network infrastructure were based on a convergence model of services and applications, as well as a single and flexible network accessible to all clients from any location and at any time.

51


Table of Contents

With our network infrastructure, we are able to provide fully integrated services, whether fixed-line or wireless, voice, data or image, thereby optimizing available resources.

     During 2004,To our networks as a whole, in 2005 we accomplished some important technological milestones, including:

64


Table of Contents

Competition     We are currently in the process of transitioning our voice and data networks to a more unified structure to provide better efficiencies across our service and product platforms. This transition is designed to unify our offerings of forms of media (voice, data and images) above a unique transport structure based on IP, including media transmitted through fixed access points and mobile access points in an integrated environment unifying the Telecom and IT worlds. To this end, in 2005, we implemented a new telecommunications services structure in order to better operate our services and applications. This structure is designed to create a more efficient service environment to more fully compliment our Next Generation Network that we offer to our customers. In this new structure, our services are implemented in a centralized way and are available in a homogenous and efficient way to any network telecommunication user. In addition, this structure allows us to develop and implement all of our services in an open market pattern utilizing a wide variety of suppliers, eliminating the need for different networks to be serviced by different servicers and allowing sharing between network applications to promote optimization of our network usage.

     We have consolidated our call center structure, by merging our 30 pre-existing sites into five sites (Goiânia, Campo Grande, Florianópolis, Brasília and Curitiba) while improving the level of service through outsourcing. In addition, in an effort to improve service to our corporate customers, we have created a call center which is dedicated to such customers. We have implemented a customer relationship management system which integrates our systems and provides a database of information for each customer so that we can provide better service and identify sales opportunities during each contact we have with our customers. In addition, we are targeting small and medium-sized companies, in order to render more specialized customer services to them.

     In 2005, we also continued our development of a transport and access layer to provide broadband access coverage and traffic capacity. We began the expansion of our backbone Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing (“DWDM”) and increased our data networks core, which allowed us to offer various services that require more bandwidth for their use. We also developed our access networks pass, including the acquisition of our own satellite platform, which permits us to offer voice and data services in remote or not accessible locations through our own conventional networks, both inside and outside of Region II.

     We also continued to implement our DSLAMs/Ethernet network, developing an infrastructure concentrated on ADSL access. Our network is better prepared to support ADSL 2+ technologies that would allow us to offer higher speed services. In addition, to accommodate a higher demand for high speed services, we are creating a new Metro-Ethernet access network. Finally, we implemented an address control and name resolution system for our IP networks with the objective of optimizing resources and improving the availability of Internet access services.

     In 2005, we continued to stay competitive in the technological marketplace, participating in a number of international educational meetings designed to educate members on the latest and most efficient network technologies, including European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI), 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), Telecoms & Internet Converged Services & Protocols for Advanced Networks (TISPAN) and Fixed-Mobile Convergence Alliance (FMCA). In addition, we are considering several new technologies for implementation in the near future, including Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access (“Wimax”), a New Generation of DSLAM, an Internet Protocol Television Platform (“IPTV”) and Gigabit Passive Optical Networking (“GPON”).

Competition

     The telecommunications industry in Brazil is becoming increasingly competitive. We operate in the local fixed-line telecommunications, domestic and international long distance telecommunications, as well as in the data communications and wireless telecommunications markets in our region. We compete primarily on the basis of features, pricing and customer service. In general, the increasingly competitive marketplace has resulted in decreasing prices for telecommunications services, also driven by increasing competition,the implementation of new technology and an increase in regulatory oversight. Accordingly, the cost of maintaining our market share hasAdditionally, any increased and our margins have decreased due to higher subscriber acquisition costscompetition in the formprovision of advertising and discounts.Voice Over Internet Protocol (“VOIP”) services should only have a minimal effect on our revenues.

     As a result65


Table of the certification by Anatel that we have met our universalization targets on January 19, 2004, we started offering interregional and international long distance services and we began offering wireless telephony services in our region in furtherance of our business strategy to provide integrated telecommunications services both in our region and throughout Brazil. The certification of other service providers' compliance with universalization and expansion targets permits other service providers to operate in our region. We may now have to compete in our region against competitors from outside of our region that offer a more extensive array of fixed-line, mobile, local and/or long-distance telecommunications services throughout Brazil.

Contents

Local Services

     Currently, we are the leading local fixed-line telecommunications services provider in our region, with an estimated 95.0%94.6% market share. This estimate isshare, based on outside consultants' statistical estimates using volume of outgoing and incoming local calls of our competitors that interconnect through our network. Global Village

52


Table of Contents

Telecom is our main competitor in providing local fixed-line telecommunications services in our region. Our dominant position in the local fixed-line telecommunications market is due, among other things, to the fact that we did not face any competition in this market until the entry of Global Village Telecom in November of 2000. Global Village Telecom is an independent service provider operating under an authorization from Anatel. Since then,its entry into the market, we have been able to maintain our market share in our region due to our extensive network and thecompetitive features, prices and services we offer.services.

     In the short-term, despite the fact that there are already numerous companies with permission from Anatel to provide local fixed telecommunications service in our region, we could lose additional market share, in the provision of local fixed-line telecommunications services, mainly in the corporate segment, asif additional competitors are allowed to enter the fixed-line market in our region. To date, numerous companies have permission by Anatel to provide local fixed telecommunications services in our region. Our fixed-line services are also subject to competition from wireless service providers. See Item 3 "Key“Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks RelatingRelated to the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry—We face increasing competition in the Brazilian telecommunications industry which may have a material adverse effect on our market share, results of operations and financial condition."

Intraregional (intrastate and interstate) Long-Distance Service

     We are currently the leading intraregional long-distance telecommunications servicesservice provider in our region, with an estimated 84.9%89.0% of the intraregional market share in 2004. These estimates are2005, based on the volume of outgoing and incoming long-distance calls that select us to carry such calls by imputinginputting our carrier selection code. Pursuant to Anatel regulations, callers are able to choose a service provider for each long distance call by selecting a carrier selection code that identifies the carrier. Until July 6, 2003, this was permitted only for calls made from fixed-line phones. Since such date, mobile callers can also choose a service provider by selecting a carrier selection code. Our carrier selection code is "14". Accordingly, domestic long distance carriers, including us, compete in the mobile-linemobile long distance market. As our carrier selection code "14" was widely used for calls originating from fixed telephones, we quickly gained a significant share of the long-distance calls originating from mobile phones. Embratel is our most significant competitor in providing intraregional long-distance telecommunications services in our region with approximately 8.1%9.0% of the total market share in 2004.2005. The remaining market share is divided among Global Village Telecom, Intelig and other operators. The licenses awarded to Embratel, Intelig and Global Village Telecom are not subject to the same service quality and network expansion and modernization obligations that we are subject to under our concessions.

     In the short-term, we expect to lose market share in the provision of intraregional long-distance telecommunications services as additional competitors are alloweddue to enter the market.increased competition from Embratel. To date, numerous companies have permission by Anatel to provide intraregional long distance telecommunications services in our region.region, but we do not expect that these companies will gain meaningful market share. See Item 3 "Key“Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks RelatingRelated to the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry—We face increasing competition in the Brazilian telecommunications industry which may have a material adverse effect on our market share, results of operations and financial condition."

Interregional and International Service

     Historically,Until December 31, 2003, under Anatel rules, regional fixed-line companies, such as us,ours, generally were not permitted to offer interregional or international long-distance services until December 31, 2003.services. Having received certification by Anatel of our compliance with universalization targets on January 19, 2004, we began offering interregional and international long-distance services. Due to our unique position in Region II combined with competitive marketing and promotional pricing, by December 31, 2005, we were quickly able to gain approximately 35.6% of theattain a 59% interregional market share and 23.8% of the33% international market share in Region II, in 2004.which represented an increase of approximately 10 and 7 percentage points, from the prior year. We compete primarily against Embratel, which, hasas of December 31, 2005, had approximately 49.2% and 51.5%33% of the interregional and international market share, respectively,representing a loss of 7% in our region in 2004.these services from the prior year. Embratel also controls approximately 48% of the international long-distance service market share. We expect our market share to increase as clients are no longer concerned about selecting a carrier based on where the call ends.

66


Table of Contents

     To date, although numerous companies have permission by Anatel to provide interregional and international long distance telecommunications services in our region.region, we do not expect to experience a significant decrease in our market share due to increased competition in the near future. See Item 3 "Key“Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks RelatingRelated to the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry—We face increasing competition in the Brazilian telecommunications industry which may have a material adverse effect on our market share, results of operations and financial condition. "There are also risks to our ability to continue to provide these services if TII returns to our control group. See "Risk

53


Table of Contents

Factors—Certain Beneficial Shareholders…" This could have a material adverse effect on our ability to increase our market share.

Data Transmission Services

     Over the past few years, the data communications sector of the telecommunications industry has shown the highest annual growth rates and has accordingly attracted many participants. We believe that within data transmission services, the broadband market will grow substantially over the next few years as broadband, and in particular ADSL, can offer users a single access point through which they can obtain voice, data and image services.

     We have increased our market share in the data communications market primarily through the development of our ADSL service.service that has grown substantially in the last year, giving us the highest penetration rate of ADSL access per fixed-line in service among Brazilian carriers. We are the leading provider of broadband ADSL accessesaccess in Region II with approximately 535,0001,013,893 ADSL accesses.accesses in 2005. Our leading position in ADSL is based upon our market share of the local service market as ADSL accesses are provided through the local telephone lines in our region. Approximately 50.0%60.0% of the ADSL accesses we provide in Region II are to our BrTurbo customers. Global Village Telecom also provides ADSL accesses in our region. Weregion, and we also face competition from cable TV operators who provide broadband access through cable modems. To date, in Brazil, we have not faced significant competition from cable providers providing telephonytelephone or quasi-telephonyquasi-telephone services which compete with the telephonytelephone services we offer and the penetration of cable television in our region is limited.

     In the dial-up services market, our DialNet service hasmarket share is approximately 86.0% of the internet dial up service market81% in our region. This estimate isregion, based upon our share of the total volume and duration of dial up calls that are made using our network which we can identify as calls made to dial up services including our own.service providers. We compete in the dial up internet market primarily with Global Village Telecom. We have approximately 86.0% of the market share for Dedicated IP services in Region II, with the remainder offered by Embratel. Grupo BrT Cabos Submarinos competes against the submarine cable business of Telefônica, Global Crossing and Telecom Italia. We may face significant competition in all of our data transmission services if we are required by Anatel to lower the rates we are permitted to charge other operators or ISPs to use our lines.

     Vetor (MPLS based IP VPN) reached 1,300 accesses, corresponding to an approximate 37.0% market share in Region II. Following the major trends of the market, this product had the highest growth rate among data communications products.

     In November 2004, we launched the International Private Line service, extending SLDD services to other countries. The service offers secure and efficient data, voice and multimedia transmission at different speeds and for various volumes of information and is targeted at the corporate, government and enterprise markets, focusing on connection points between Brazil and United States.

Internet Services

     In 2004,2005, through our operating subsidiary BrTurbo, we had an approximate 60.8%approximately a 54.0% market share of the monthly broadband ISP sales in Region II. BrTurbo wasWe are the leader in terms of number of active clients among thethose providers operating high-speed access services based on ADSL technology in Region II. AtAs of December 31, 2004, it2005, we had 257,120534,175 residential clients and 8,74613,616 business clients. Currently, about 50.0% of the ADSL accesses we provide are to BrTurbo's clients. BrTurbo competesWe compete primarily against the ISPsother internet service providers such as Terra.com and Globo.com andas well as local area ISPs.internet service providers.

     Since we acquired iBest, the company has grown mainly in Region II, where it is currently the market leader with approximately 44.9%50.0% of total internet minutes. As of December 31, 2005, iBest ended 2004 with more than 8.3had approximately 10 million registered users of which 1.5 million were active, generating approximately 16.518.9 billion dial-up minutes during that year. The "Prêmio iBest" brand name has become the largest Internet Award in Brazil.2005. iBest's main competitors in Region II are Click 21 and Pop, which are owned by Embratel and Global Village Telecom, respectively.

     iG is consideredwas the largest dial-upfirst Brazilian portal to offer free internet service provideraccess and has a presence in more than 1,200 cities, with approximately 18 million clients registered and 2.0 million active users in the last 30 days. As of Brazil withDecember 31, 2005, iG provided broadband access to a market shareclient base of more than 30.0% of dial-up internet minutes. Additionally, iG is the largest wireless content portal of the country.150,000 active clients. In addition, iG has more than 3 million activea 334,000 client base subscribing for access, broadband and other paid services. iG competes primarily against other internet usersservice providers such as Terra.com, iTelefonica from Telefônica, UOL from Grupo Folha and 7.7 million active email accounts.

54


Table of ContentsPortugal Telecom and Oi Internet from Telemar.

Wireless Services

     We launched our wireless operations in September 2004. Wireless services are equally competitive and we face competition in Region II mainly from (i) a joint venture between Telefônica and Portugal Telecom (marketing(marketed under the brand name "Vivo"), (ii) Telmex, which competes against us in our region through América Móviles (marketing

67


Table of Contents

(marketed under the brand name "Claro") and (iii) TIM. In addition, wireless services compete directly against fixed-line services. If

     The mobile telephone business is a highly competitive one, and Region II has the highest penetration rate in the country by outsider service providers. As of December 31, 2005, we had 2.2 million mobile telephone clients, representing 8.7% of the market share in our region. We have become the largest integrated telecommunications carrier in Region II. In 2005, our convergent and innovative products and our one-stop-shop flagship store point of sales program generated sales of 4,160 dial-up modems, 1,857 caller-ID devices, and 3,370 fixed phones.

     We are ablea member of the Fixed Mobile Convergence Alliance, or FMCA, a 22 member association with the principal goal of offering integrated products and technologies to completeclients from all members. We have also announced the transactions contemplated byentry of Brasil Telecom GSM as a sponsor member of the Merger Agreement, then we will not be offering wireless services directly but willInternet Segura Movement, or MIS, and associated of Electronic Market Brazilian Commission (“E-Net Commission”). The company is the first telecommunications company of the sector to participate in this business throughMIS. We believe that the acquisition of an equity interest in TIMB, which as of April 28, 2005, had approximately 14.6 million wirelessbest way to prevent internet fraud is to educate our users. The Merger Agreement also contemplates operational agreements through which we willMIS acts to educate users on the necessary steps that must be abletaken to continue to offer convergence services.safeguard security information while using the internet.

Effects of Competition

     TheCompetition in the telecommunications business is expected to increase as a result of the deregulation that startedbegan in 2002, and includes our recentincluding the certification and authorization process by which companies are permitted to provide additional services inside and outside our region is expected to increase competition in our businesses.of their regions. Although we believe we have a unique infrastructure in Region II (having inherited the incumbent network upon privatization of Telebrás) and we have been developing strategies to effectively protect our business, we expect that competition as a result of the entry of additional competitors into the market for local, long distance and wireless services in Region II, as well as significant industry consolidation, may adversely affect our related revenues. We anticipate, however, that our growth in the Brazilian market will generate higher revenues, especially now thatpartially offset this competition, since we are able to offer long distance and data services on a nationwide basis andin addition to wireless services in our region. While we expect that local traffic per line will continue to decline as we expand our network to lower-income customers who, on average, make fewer calls, we expect that our expansion into theseother new business areas will provide us with new growth opportunities.

     The impact of these competitive pressures will depend onupon a variety of factors that cannot currently be assessed at this time, some of which are beyond our control. Among such factors are the technical and financial resources available to our competitors, the business strategies and capabilities of our competitors, prevailing market conditions, the regulations applicable to new entrants and us, and the effectiveness of our efforts to prepare for increased competition and consolidation. Our ability to continue to compete successfully will also depend on the success of our marketing, financial and other resources (including our access to capital) in comparison to our competitors and on our ability to anticipate and respond to competitive factors affecting the industry, including the introduction of new services, changes in consumer preferences, changes in regulation, demographics trends, economic conditions, discount pricing strategies by competitors as well as further industry consolidation.

Customer Service

     We provide customer service primarily through call centers and flagship stores. In addition we provide services through our website and in physical locations through lottery booths (which take payments)for the acceptance of payments and post offices which provide services such as terminal activation and repair requests.

     We have consolidated our call center structure, by merging our 30 pre-existing sites into five sites (Goiânia, Campo Grande, Florianópolis, Brasília and Curitiba) while improving the level of service through outsourcing.

     In addition, in an effort to improve service to our corporate customers, we have created a call center which is dedicated to such customers. We have implemented a customer relationship management system which integrates our systems and provides a database of information for each customer so that we can provide better service and identify sales opportunities during each contact we have with our customers. In addition, we are targeting small and medium-sized companies, in order to render more specialized customer services to them.

68


Table of Contents

Sales Channels and Marketing

     We have improved our sales channels in order to render specialized customer services in different niches and sectors of our market, but primarily in the corporate market. Our sales channels consist of direct marketing, our website, and our customer service contacts. Our residential sales are primarily handled through our 800 numbers or our website. Our corporate sales are primarily handled through direct sales contacts with our sales representatives.

     With the launch of our mobile operations in September 2004, we opened integrated flagship stores following the one-stop-shop concept. In thesethose stores, clients have access to our entire portfolio of products and

55


Table of Contents

services and we are able to capitalize on the competitive advantages of an integrated telephonytelephone operation. The majority of our flagship stores are located in the main shopping centers of Region II. Our mobile brand, Brasil Telecom GSM, is also marketed in other points of sales, including kiosks, exclusive authorized sales agents, non-exclusive authorized sales agents and resellers among the main retailers.

     We have increased our use of direct marketing in conjunction with outbound and inbound telemarketing as a way of targeting our market sectors (residential, commercial and corporate). At the same time, we have developed a complete portfolio of products and services, such as SLDD, Frame Relay, ATM, IP WAN, Dedicated IP, Light IP and DialNet, to meet the needs of our customers.

     We have also developed and improved our website, in an effort to deliver some of our services online. Currently, customers are able to access over 16 different types of services online, including: registration for the purchase of a telephone line, issuance of a second copy of a bill, consultation of a detailed and summarized bill, download of a bill, verification of receipt of payment, and requests for repairs.

Intellectual Property

     We conduct research and development in the areas of telecommunications services, but do not independently develop any new telecommunications technology.

     Since prior     Our Patents in Brazil

     We filed four patent applications in the database of the Brazilian Trademark and Patent Office (“INPI”) between 2004 and 2005 to protect telecommunication systems and methods (patents are valid for 20 years counted from the filing date). We cannot confirm whether INPI has begun the technical analysis of these patents to verify if they are in accordance with Brazilian Legislation. Additionally, according to the Brazilian Industry Property Law, it is necessary to pay an annual fee starting as of the third year, counted from the date of the filing of the patents application or the utility model application, in order to maintain the validity of patents and utility models. In case the annual fees are not paid, INPI will automatically cancel the patent and/or the utility model, and INPI’s cancellation decision is then published on the INPI’s Official Gazette. After the publication of such decision, the owner of the patent and/or utility model can request the reversal of a cancellation decision by INPI by the payment of extra fees. We cannot confirm whether we have paid the annual fees associated with the four patent applications, and are therefore unable to confirm their status.

     Prior to the breakup of Telebrás, our company, as well as each of the other operating subsidiaries of Telebrás, have contributed toFundação CPqDCentro de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento em Telecomunicações ("the Center"), a research and development center formerly operated by Telebrás which develops telecommunications technology in Brazil. Pursuant to our arrangement with the Center, we have access to telecommunications software developed by the Center and other technological services provided by the Center, such as equipment testing and consulting and training services. In addition to the Center, we also depend on manufacturers of telecommunications products for the development of new hardware and new telecommunications technologies. See Item 5 "Operating“Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Research and Development." and "—History and Development of the company—Company—Capital Expenditures—Research and Development."

69


Table of Contents

Our Trademarks in Brazil

     We have numerouscurrently own 458 trademarks registeredfiled in different classes of products and services, with the majority protecting communication services. Some trademarks, however, protect advertising, business management, administration, insurance, financial, monetary and real state affairs as well as scientific and technological services and research, design and industrial analysis and research services, design and development of computer hardware and software as well as apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images, magnetic data carriers, recording discs.

     In addition, we have filed 453 trademark applications and 133 trademark registrations. Some of these applications have been published for third party opposition and are still under examination at INPI, a process that may take up to five years to be concluded. Some of our trademark applications have been opposed by third parties we cannot insure that they will be granted by INPI if such oppositions are accepted.

     Additionally, some of our trademark registrations are due for renewal. According to the Brazilian Institute of Industrial Property (INPI).law a trademark must be renewed after 10 years counted from the date of the granting of the registration.

Our Domain NameNames in Brazil

     We have numerous registeredcurrently own 138 domain names covering our various subsidiaries and platforms of business registered in Brazilthe name of Brasil Telecom, 179 additional domain names registered under the name of Internet Group do Brasil Ltda., 16 domain names registered under the name of iBEST S.A., and abroad.50 domain names registered under the name of BrTSi.

Regulation of the Brazilian Telecommunications Industry

General

     Our business, including the services we provide and the rates we charge, are subject to comprehensive regulation under the General Telecommunications Law. We operate in each of the states in our region based on the concessions that were granted to each of Telepar, Telesc, Telegoiás, Telebrasília, Telemat, Telems, Teleron, Teleacre, CRT and CTMR. We also operate outside our original concession area based on the new authorizations received from Anatel as a result of the universalizationour achievement of universal service targets certification. These concessions and authorizations allow us to provide specified services and set forth certain obligations with which we need to comply (the "List of Obligations").comply.

     Anatel is the regulatory agency for telecommunications that acts under theRegulamento da Agência Nacional de Telecomunicações (the "Anatel Decree"). Anatel is administratively independent from the Government and financially autonomous. Anatel is required to report on its activities to the Ministry of Communications and to the Brazilian Congress. Any proposed regulation of Anatel is subject to a period of public comment, including

56


Table of Contents

public hearings, and Anatel's decisions may be challenged administratively before the agency itself or through the judiciary system only in the Brazilian courts. Under Brazilian law, we, like all public-regime companies, must have the rates that we charge for products and services approved by Anatel. On June 20, 2003, Anatel enacted Resolution 341, which provides for new types of Anatel concession contracts, effective from January 1, 2006 until 2025.

Concessions and Licenses

General

     We operate under public-switched telephone network concessions (local and domestic long-distance), which grant us the right to offer local and domestic long-distance services in Region II.

     Concessions to provide public-switched telephone network services are granted under the public regime but such services may also be provided through authorizations granted under the private regime.

70


Table of Contents

     In addition to us, the companies that operate in the public regime in Brazil ("public regime companies") include Telemar, Telesp, Embratel and certain other local operators. The four main public regime companies are the largest primary providers of fixed-line telecommunications services in Brazil, including local services and intraregional, interregional and international long-distance services. All other telecommunications service providers, including the other companies authorized to provide fixed-line services in Region II, operate in the private regime ("private regime companies").regime.

     According to the terms of Article 63 of the General Telecommunications Law and of Article 13 of the Brazilian Telecommunications Services Regulation, public regime companies are subject to certain obligations as to continuity and the universalization of services.universal service. Public regime companies are also subject to Anatel's supervision in regardwith respect to the rates that they may charge. On the other hand, private regime companies are generally not subject to the requirements as to universalization ofuniversal services, but they are subject to certain network expansion and quality of service obligations set forth in their licenses.

     Public regime companies, such as Brasil Telecom, also oftenlike our company, normally offer certain services in the private regime, of which the most significant are data transmission services. Our wireless services are offeredthrough Multimedia Communication Services (MCS) authorizations. In addition, on December 18, 2002, we acquired a license to offer our mobile services under the private regime, according to a license acquired by us on December 18, 2002.regime.

Fixed-line Services – Public Regime

     Each public regime company operates under a concession that expires onwas granted a 20 year extension in December 31,of 2005. EachAs part of the extension, public regime company may extend its current concessioncompanies became subject to the rules for an additional 20-year period. On June 20, 2003, Anatel approved a new General Plan on Quality and the concession contract model under which all fixed-line telecommunications carriers will operate from January 1, 2006 onwards. On June 28, 2003 Decree 4769 was entered approving the General Plan on Universal Service.providers of news services, including universalization rules. See "—Obligations of Telecommunications Companies—“Brazilian Telecommunication Sector Regulation– New Telecommunications Regulations." The concessions may also be revoked prior to expiration. Every second year during” During the 20-year extension period, companies will be required to pay biannual fees equal to 2.0% of their annual net revenues from the provision of telecommunications servicestheir public switched telephone network (excluding taxes and social contributions) during the immediately preceding year.

     Prior to January 2004, we were not permitted to offer interregional and international long-distance services. Since we receivedOn January 20, 2004, our concession contracts were amended to provide for Anatel's certification for achieving thein connection with our achievement of universalization targets, and we werebecame qualified to receive a concession to provide such services, following the corresponding amendments of the concession contracts, whichservices. Thus, we were signed on January 20, 2004, enabling usable to originate long-distance calls in our concession area and terminate them at any point in the country, as well as outside the country. SeeFor more information, see "— Obligations of Telecommunications Companies — Public Regime —Service Restrictions."

Fixed-line Services – Private Regime

     The Brazilian Telecommunications Regulation provides forRegulamentation precipitated the introduction of competition in telephone services in Brazil by enabling the Brazilian federal government to authorize, through Anatel, four private regime companies—three to provide fixed-line local services and intraregional long distance services, one in each of the

57


Table of Contents

three regions of the General Concession Plan, and one to provide intraregional, interregional and international long distance services throughout Brazil.Brazil – to provide services concurrently with the public regime companies. Anatel has granted private regime operators licenses to operate in Region II. Anatel has also granted licenses to other private regime companies to operate in Regions I and III of the General Concession Plan and licenses to other private regime companies to provide intraregional, interregional and international long distance service in Region IV of the General Concession Plan. Since 2002, theThe number of authorizations that canmay be granted by the Brazilian federal government is unlimited.

     After receiving the certification for the accomplishment of our universalizationuniversal service targets, we obtained authorization under the private regime to provide local and domestic long-distance services in certain sectors of our Region under the private regimeII where we were not present before, and toin Regions I and III through the General Concession Plan. In addition, we were authorized to provide international long-distance services in Regions I, II and III (the entire country) of the General Concession Plan. The other primary public regime companies received similar authorizations.

71


Table of Contents

Regulation of wireless servicesWireless Services – PCS

     In September 2000, Anatel released aamended regulation regardingrelated to the provision of wireless telecommunications services for PCS. TheThese amended PCS authorizations enable new participants in the Brazilian telecommunications market to compete with existingalready existent telecommunications service providers. The amended PCS regulation divides Brazil into tenthree distinct regions, each of which corresponds to the regions applicable to the public regime fixed-line telephone service providers. PCS services are provided within the 1,800 MHz band, which contains Bands C, D and E. Accordingly, in addition toE, and the adaptation of the terms of authorization of Band A and Band B service providers toamended PCS authorizations,regulations permit up to three additional PCS authorizations may be granted in each PCS region.region to compete with already existent telecommunications service providers. Anatel held auctions for PCS authorizations during 2001 and 2002. No2002, but no Band C PCS authorizations were granted.

     The PCS license sets forth certain obligations and targets that must be met by a PCS service provider. Under these obligations and in our region corresponding Region(Region II ofunder the General PCS Concession Plan,Authorization Plan), we are required to:

     A locality is considered "covered""serviced" when the covered service area contains at least 80.0% of the urban area. Failure to meet these targets may result in the imposition of penalties established in the regulations and, in extreme circumstances, in terminationrevocation of the PCS license by Anatel.

Obligations of Telecommunications Companies

     Like other telecommunications service providers, in addition to the service requirements, we are also subject to obligations concerning quality of service and network expansion and modernization. TheAs a public regime companiescompany, we are also subject to a set of special restrictions regarding the services theywe may offer, contained in the General Concession Plan, and special obligations regarding service quality, network expansion and modernization contained in the General Plan on Universal Service and the General Plan on Quality.

58


Table of Contents

New telecommunications regulationsTelecommunications Regulations

     On June 10,27, 2003, the Brazilian government promulgatedissued a presidential decree, (the "Decree")Decree No. 4769, setting forth a number of changes in the regulation of Brazil's public switched telephone network. The Decreedecree sets forth general policies regarding, among others, universal access to telecommunications services, stimulation of employment, labor market and development of the Brazilian industry in the telecommunications sector, stimulation of competition and the adoption of rate adjustment policies that taketook into account Brazilian socio-economic conditions and the financial equilibrium of the existing concession contracts. The Decreedecree also states that certainestablished some changes should be reflected inincluding the terms of each concession contractconcessions contracts extension to be entered into by each public regime company by December 31, 2005.switched telephone network.

     Pursuant to Decree No. 4769, dated June 27, 2003, the Federal Government approved a new General Plan on Universal Service, which will require PSTNrequired that providers to achieve certainnew targets from January 1, 2006. The purpose of the Planplan is to allow all Brazilians, regardless of where they are located or their socio-economic status, to have access to the public switched telephone network. The costs related to meeting the targets contemplated by the Plan are tonew plan must be paid forcovered solely by the concessionaries of the PSTN (incumbents) pursuant to terms stipulated in each provider's concession contract. Anatel may revise the universal serviceuniversalization targets, pursuant to the concession contracts, as well as propose additional

72


Table of Contents

targets and accelerate the Plan.plan. The Planplan applies to local, domestic and long-distance service providers in varying degrees.

     Telecommunications services providers will beare required to:

     LocalIn addition, local service PSTN providers will be required tomust activate and maintain telecommunications services stations ("PST") in each General Concession Plan sector in varying numbers. Such numbers will be determined by the estimated population, based on annual basis, from the years 2007 toand 2011. The public switched telephone network incumbent services providers must also activate one PSTtelecommunications services stations per General Concession Plan sector in cooperative service stations ("UAC")located in rural areas. For the years 2007 and 2008, the requirement will vary according to the size of the cooperative. For the year ended 2009, all cooperatives must be served.serviced.

     The board of directors of AnatelLocal service providers must also approvedcomply with the Special Individual Access Class rules, which are designed to require service for the less economically advantaged population. Under the Special Individual Access Class, a public hearing with respect to the regulation of special individual access ("AICE"). The goal of AICE is to meet the needs of lower income households not yet serviced by the public switched telephone network, and the offer, rates, payment and utilization conditions, call treatment, network usage remuneration and taxation of AICE will be differentiated than for regular residential telephone services. AICE will be accessed via prepaid cards, which could be used for any type of telecommunications services. The installation orders of AICE will have to be fulfilled by the concessionaires within 30 days after the solicitation registration, according to the General Plan on Universal Service, effective from January 1, 2006.

59


Table of Contents

     On June 20, 2003, Anatel also approved the terms of the New Concession Contracts. See "Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business." In June 2003, we notified Anatel of our intention to extend Brasil Telecom's current concessions. Brasil Telecom and Anatel are expected to formallyuser may enter into new concession contracts bya plan under which he or she is required to pay a lesser amount of monthly fee for service than the end of 2005.basic plans.

     The New Concession Contracts also contain terms reflectingthat incorporate the Telecommunications Political Decree, the new General Plan on Quality and the new General Plan on Universal Service described above, which refer to:

73


Table of Contents



     Both the new General Plan on Quality and the new General Plan on Universal Service were approved in June 2003. They will only come into force upon2003, became effective on January 1, 2006 after the executionextension of the New Concession Contracts.Contracts that expire in 2025.

     From our analysis to date, theThe major differences inbetween the old and new models of the Concession Contracts relate to universalizationuniversal targets and rate structure. Concessionaires will be required to implement the PSTN in a number ofnew locations, including smaller communities, and the IGP-DI will no longer be used to determine the annual inflation-based adjustments to the rates. The terms of the New Concession Contracts also anticipatecontemplate future number portability, service resale and resale.the General Target Competition Plan. This will enable customers to change telecomtelecommunications service providers without the inconvenience of having to change their contact number, which is especially important for corporate customers.

Public Regime – Service Restrictions

     Until December 31, 2003,2001, according to the General Concession Plan, all fixed-line telecommunications service concessionaires, such aslike our company, were prohibited from offering new services, such as mobile services, fixed-line telecommunications services in the local mode outside our Region and in the interregional or international long-distance mode. Embratel was also prohibited from offering local or wireless services. The anticipatedOn January 1, 2002, the accomplishment of the universalization targets on behalf ofby the concessionaires enabled them to be exempt from this restriction. Today, every public fixed-line telecommunications service provider is authorized to offer all other telecommunications services, with the exception of cable television services. See "—Network Expansion—General Plan on Universal Service" and "—Quality of Service—General Plan on Quality." Every fixed-line telecommunications service provider was authorized, or is in the process of being authorized, to offer all other telecommunications services, except cable television services.

     Public regime companies are subject to certain restrictions on alliances, joint ventures, mergers and acquisitions, including:

Network Expansion – General Plan on Universal Service

     Under the General Plan on Universal Service, each local fixed-line concessionaire is required to implement access to long-distance service within its region by installing public telephones in every location with more than 100 inhabitants situated at a geodesic distance of no more than 30 kilometers from another region serviced by the PSTN with individual access. The long distance concessionaire is responsible for providing service for locations with

60


more than 100 inhabitants situated at a distance superior to 30 kilometers from another region serviced by the PSTN with individual access. No subsidies or other supplemental financing are anticipated for the network expansion obligations of the public regime companies. If a public regime company fails to meet its obligations in a particular region, Anatel may apply the penalties established in the terms and conditions of the concessions.

Quality of Services – General Plan on Quality

     Each regionalPSTN public andor private regime company must comply with the provisions of the General Plan on Quality and also with the terms of their respective concessions, licenses andor authorizations. All costs related to the attainment of the goals established by the General Plan on Quality must be exclusively borne by the respective telephone service provider. The General Plan on Quality establishes minimum quality standards with regard to:

74


Table of Contents

     These quality standards are measured according to the definitions and quality indicators established by Anatel. Companies are required to makepresent monthly reports to Anatel regarding their performance in attaining the quality goals. Additionally, companies are obligated to provide Anatel with an in-depth report and analysis regarding each quality goal that is not achieved. Anatel may also collect such data from companies at any time and without prior notice.

     Companies that fail to attain the Anatel quality goals may be subject to warnings, fines, intervention by Anatel, temporary suspensions of service or cancellations of concessions and authorizations. See "—Fines and Penalties" below.

Fines and Penalties

     Failure to meet the network expansion and modernization obligations established by the General Plan on Universal Service, or any act or failure to act that harms competition in the telecommunications sector, may result in fines and penalties of up to R$50.0 million, as well as potential revocation of concessions.

     Failure to meet the quality of service obligations established by the General Plan on Quality may result in fines and penalties of up to R$40.0 million.

Interconnection

     General rules regarding interconnection are described in the General Interconnection Rule,Regulation, enacted by Anatel. All operating companies providing telecommunications services are required,must, if technically feasible, to make their networks available for interconnection on a non-discriminatory basis whenever such aone request is made by any other telecommunications provider. Anatel currently sets and adjusts the fixed and mobile interconnection rates between fixed-

61


Table of Contents

line networks as well as between fixed-line and wireless networks. Anatel has allowed fixed-line and wireless network operators to freely negotiate interconnection rates. With the contracts extension new rules were preview to the interconnection collection tariffs.

Unbundling of local networks

     On May 13, 2004, Anatel issued Order (Despacho) 172, which establishes rules for partial ("lineunbundling of local telephone networks, which we refer to as "line sharing"), and full unbundling of local telephone networks, and requires us to make our networks available to other telecommunications service providers. This Orderlegislation limits the rate we can charge for line sharing per line for broadband speeds of up to 512kbps.512 kbps. Additional charges, such as co-location charges, are applied over the line sharing base price, increasing the total cost of the unbundled line. Anatel has not yet fixed rates for full unbundling, although we expect that these rates will be lower than the rates we currently are currently permitted to charge. This Orderregulation was designed to increase competition in the local fixed-line and broadband internet access markets by making it easier for new telephone companies operating under either the public or private regime to enter these markets and for existing providers to provide new services or enter new regions, since the networks of all telecommunications service providers, including fixed-line operators such as us, will be made available at lower rates. Similarly, this Orderlegislation makes it easier for us to provide new services and enter into new regions in competition with other operators. However, to date operational rules for the implementation of the unbundling have not yet been agreed by the telecom operators in Brazil.to among Brazilian telecommunications operators. These regulations are recent, and by the endas of 2004December 31, 2005 no unbundled lines havehad been used by competitors in our region.

75


Table of Contents

Rate Regulation

     For basic plans, our concessions establish a mechanism of annual rate adjustment, based on rate baskets and the use of the IGP-DI price index. A rate basket is defined for local services (local basket) and long-distance services (DLD basket). The rates for the provision of services through payphonespublic telephones and the rates for address changechanges are treated separately.

     The adjustment index considers the IGP-DI price index variation, discounting the pre-established productivity factor in the Concession Contract. Within each basket component, the rates have a cap price,maximum value, which can be adjusted up to a percentage above the established index (up to 9.0% higher for the local basket and up to 5.0% higher for the DLD basket). However, the application of a higher index to one of the items in the basket will require a balancing of the remaining items so as not to exceed the established limit for such basket.

     On the adjustment dates for the local and DLD baskets, the rate adjustments for network use are also approved. These rates apply when any networks are used by other telecommunications carriers. There is a rate charged per minute of use of our local network by other carriers (TU-RL) and another for use of our intercity network (TU-RIU).

     From the year 2001 to December 31, 2005, our rates and the rates of other regional fixed-line companies have been and will be adjusted downward, in real terms, as follows:

  K-factor annual productivity adjustments 
  
  2001  2002  2003   2004  2005 
      
 
Fixed-line companies—local (services) 1.0%  1.0%  1.0%  1.0%  1.0% 
Fixed-line companies—local (network) 5.0%  10.0%  15.0%  20.0%  20.0% 
Fixed-line companies—long-distance and intercity network 4.0%  4.0%  4.0%  5.0%  5.0% 

     We may also offer alternative plans in addition to the basic service plan. Such alternative plans must be submitted to Anatel for approval and are not subject to a price cap. Nevertheless, once set, prices may only be adjusted annually, based on the IGP-DI rate.

     Companies holding PCS licenses are allowed to freely price their wireless services, provided they are linked to existing service plans authorized by Anatel. Price caps are adjusted annually, based on the IGP-DI. The interconnection rates were also subject to price caps fixed by Anatel and adjusted on an annual basis, up until June 2004, when the values started to be freely negotiated between the parties.

62


Table of Contents

     FromIn the third year after the starting date of our concession, Anatel may submit us to the regime of free rating, provided that there is a large-scale and effective competition among the service providers. Under this regime, the concessionaire can establish its own rates. In the event this regime is implemented, Anatel may reestablish the previous regime should arbitrary increases of profits by the carriers or practices considered harmful to the competition occur. To date, we have received no indication from Anatel that they intend to submit us to such a free rating regime.

     The Renewal of the Concession Contracts also established what parameters will be used to adjust rates. In 2006, the Telecommunication Industry Index (“IST”), created by Anatel as an index basket of existing public prices, became the official index to measure sector inflation and adjust rates. For 2006 and 2007, the agency also elaborated a calculus model to the Transference Factor in order to reduce the readjustment levels to pass part of the productivity gains obtained from the companies to the users.

     Companies holding PCS licenses are allowed to freely price their wireless services, provided they are linked to existing service plans authorized by Anatel. Price caps are adjusted annually, based on the IGP-DI. The interconnection rates, until July 2004, were also subject to price caps fixed by Anatel and adjusted on an annual basis. After that date, interconnection rates between PSTN and PCS networks may be negotiated directly between parties. If the parties are unable to come to an agreement on the rates, Anatel can establish the values and open an arbitration process upon the request of any party.

     For information on our current rates and service plans, see Item 4 "Information“Item 4. Information on the Company—Rates".Rates."

76


Table of Contents

TerminationRevocation of a Concession

     There are four possible ways that aAnatel may revoke the concession of any public regime company's concession may terminate:

following circumstances:

 a split-up, spin-off, amalgamation, merger, capital reduction or transfer of the company's corporate power without Anatel's authorization;

 
the transfer of the concession without Anatel's authorization;

 
the dissolution or bankruptcy of the company; or

 
an extraordinary situation where Brazilian government intervention, although legally possible, is not undertaken by the company since such intervention would prove to be inconvenient, unnecessary or would resultresultant in unfair benefits for the company.

     In the event that a concession is terminated,revoked, Anatel may occupy the company's premises and use its employees in to continue providing telecommunications services.

Property, Plant and Equipment

     Our main equipment consists of transmission equipment, including Synchronous Digital Hierarchy - SDH systems and radio links, switching equipment, including local, tandem and transit telephone exchanges, metallic and fiber-optic cable networks, data transmissioncommunication equipment, network and infrastructure management systems and infrastructure, which include alternate and continue current and direct current supply equipment, motor-generator groups, air conditioning, towers, buildings and land surveillance.

     Our properties are located in the States of Acre, Rondônia, Goiás, Tocantins, Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso do Sul, Paraná, Santa Catarina, Rio Grande do Sul, São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, and Belo Horizonte, as well as in the Federal District. The buildings used by our management are primarily located in the capital cities of these states. At December 31, 2004, we made use of2005, our operations used approximately 5,3805,785 properties, of which 3,452 were owned by our companyus and 1,9282,333 were leased from third parties.

     As of December 31, 2004,2005, the net book value of our property, plant and equipment was approximately R$9,370.18,687.6 million (which includes automatic switching, transmission and other equipment, buildings and other fixed assets net of accumulated depreciation and work-in-progress regarding the same).

63


Table of Contents

Environmental and Other Regulatory Matters

     We, like other Brazilian telephone companies, are subject to federal, state and municipal environmental legislation and regulation. Our failure to comply with applicable environmental laws could result in administrative, civil and criminal sanctions against us.

77


Table of Contents

     As part of our day-to-day operations, we regularly install ducts for wires and cables and erect towers for transmission antennae. We may be subject to federal, state and/or municipal environmental licensing requirements due to our installation of cables along highways and railroads, over bridges, rivers and marshes, and through farms, conservation units and environmental preservation areas, among other places. So far, we have been demandedrequired to obtain environmental licenses for the installation of transmission towers and antennae in the municipality of Porto Alegre, the capital of the state of Rio Grande do Sul, with no material impact on our operations. However, there can be no assurances that other state and municipal environmental agencies will not require us to obtain environmental licenses for the installation of transmission towers and antennae in the future and that such a requirement would not have a material adverse effect on the installation costs of our network or on the speed with which we can expand and modernize our network.

     We must also comply with environmental legislation on the management of solid wastes. According to CONAMA Resolution 237 of 1997, companies responsible for the treatment and final disposal of solid industrial wastes, special wastes and solid urban wastes are subject to environmental licensing. Should the waste not be disposed of in accordance with standards established by environmental legislation, the company generating such waste may be held jointly liable for any damage caused with the company responsible for treatment of the waste. In the States of Santa Catarina, Paraná and Mato Grosso, we have already implemented management procedures promoting the recycling of batteries, transformers and fluorescent lamps. During the current year those management practices will also be implemented in the other states.

     In addition, we are subject to Anatel´s requirements, which impose limits on the levels and frequency of the electromagnetic fields originating from our telecommunications transmissions stations.

     We believe that we are in compliance with Anatel standards as well as with all applicable environmental legislation and regulations. We are currently not involved in any administrative or judicial proceeding involving material liability for environmental damage.

ITEM 4A. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 5. Operating and Financial Review and ProspectsOPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS

     The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and notes, which are included elsewhere in this Annual Report. Certain important features of the presentation of our Consolidated Financial Statements are described in the introduction to "Selected Financial Data." See Item 3 "Key Information–“Item 3. Key Information—Selected Financial Data."

Overview of Results of Operations

     Our resultsOver the last several years, we have focused on the following major initiatives:

     On May 2, 2006, TIMINT and TIMB announced their decision to terminate the Merger Agreement. In the same letter, TIMINT and TIMB reserved their alleged rights under sections 10.3 and 11.1 of the Merger Agreement.

121


Table of Contents

The arbitration that we brought against the Merger Agreement continues.

Related Party Transactions

     None of the members of our board of directors or senior management, or any close member of their respective families, has or has had, since the period beginning January 1, 2002, any direct interest in any transaction effected with our companyus which is or was unusual in its nature or conditions, or significant to our business.

     As of December 31, 2004,2005, no outstanding loans or guarantees have been made to the members of our board of directors, senior management, or any close member of their respective families.

     See also “Legal Proceedings – Disputes with and among entities that hold stakes in our Company.”

Transactions with Brasil Telecom Participações S.A.

     From time to time, we provide certain logistic and other administrative services to our parent company, Brasil Telecom Participações S.A., on an arm's length basis. For the year 2004,2005, we provided approximately R$2.94.3 million of services to Brasil Telecom Participações S.A. At December 31, 2004,2005, Brasil Telecom Participações S.A. owed us approximately R$184,00054,000 for the provision of these services.

     On May 22, 1998, we entered into a loan agreement with Brasil Telecom Participações S.A. for a total of approximately R$50.6 million, with a variable interest rate equal to the variation of the U.S. dollar versus the Brazilianreal on an annual basis + 1.75% per annum, payable at the end of each semester. The loan matures on July 1, 2014. As of December 31, 2004,2005, we owed approximately R$74.558.4 million in principal and accrued interest on this loan. See Note 28 to our consolidated audited Financial Statements.financial statements.

     On September 29, 2000, we received approximately R$87.0 million from Brasil Telecom Participações S.A. in advance of the issuance of certain debentures. During the year ended 2001, we issued an aggregate principal amount of approximately R$1.3 billion in debentures in a private placement to Brasil Telecom Participações S.A. with a variable interest rate equal to the CDI rate. The debentures are payable in three installments, onetwo of which was already paid for on July 27, 2004 (30.0%), and two other installments to be paid on July 27, 2005 (30.0%), and a third that will be paid on July 27, 2006 (40.0%) . As of December 31, 2004,2005, we owed Brasil Telecom Participações S.A. approximately R$972.0560.5 million in principal and accrued interest on these debentures.

     At December 31, 20042005 we owed Brasil Telecom Participações S.A. a total of approximately R$1.0 billion560.5 million from all loans and debentures. For the year ended December 31, 20042005 we paid Brasil Telecom Participações S.A. a total of approximately R$223.7134.9 million in interest from such loans and debentures. See Note 23b and 28 to our Audited Financial Statements.consolidated audited financial statements.

Sureties and Guarantees

     We render sureties as guarantee of loans and financings owed by us to our lending financial institutions. In 2005, referring to the guarantee benefit, we recorded expenses in favor of Brasil Telecom Participações S.A. in the amount of R$2,483 (as compared to R$3,964 in 2004)

     Brasil Telecom Participações S.A. rendered surety for us related to the contracting of insurance policies, guarantee of contractual liabilities (GOC) for 2005, which amounted to R$217,142. In 2005, in return to such surety, we returned to Brasil Telecom Participações S.A. a quarterly remuneration of R$65, representing an annual expense of R$260 (as compared to R$279 thousand in 2004).

Revenues and Accounts Receivable from Transactions With Related Parties

     The balances arise from transactions related to operating income and expense for use of installations and logistical support. As of December 31, 2004, the payable balance amounted to R$54 (as compared to R$184 in

122


Table of Contents

2004) and the amounts recorded in the statements of operations were: Operating income: R$4,291 (as compared to R$2,933 in 2004 and R$2,301 in 2003).

BrT Serviços de Internet S.A.

     Amounts Receivable and Payable, Revenues and Expenses arising from transactions related to the use of facilities, logistic support and telecommunications services: the balance receivable is R$23,126 (as compared to R$3,757 receivable on December 31, 2004). The amounts recorded in income for 2005 represented R$66,027 of operating revenues (as compared to R$55,008 in 2004) and R$172,611 of operating expenses (as compared to R$152,680 in 2004).

14 Brasil Telecom Celular S.A

     Revenues, Expenses and Amounts Receivable arising from transactions related to the use of facilities, logistic support and telecommunications services: the balance receivable is R$1,680 (as compared to R$5,858 receivable, on December 31, 2004). The amounts recorded in income for 2005 represented R$174,375 of operating revenues (as compared to R$15,250 in 2004) and R$238,026 of operating expenses (as compared to R$14,148 in 2004).

Vant Telecomunicações S.A.

     Accounts Payable, Revenues and Expenses arising from transactions related to telecommunications services: the balance payable is R$320 (as compared to R$1,208 payable on December 31, 2004) and the amounts recorded in income represented R$1,910 of operating revenues (as compared to R$1,154 in 2004) and R$1,858 of operating expenses (as compared to R$2,157 in 2004).

BrT SCS Bermuda

     Revenues and Amounts Receivable arising from transactions related to telecommunications services: the balance receivable is R$201. The amounts recorded in income for 2005 represented R$201 of operating revenues.

     Loans: on December 31, 2004 there was a loan agreement granted in US dollars, with an interest rate of 3% p.a., settled in January 2005. The balance of this assets on December 31, 2004, was R$88,619. The financial revenue until the loan settlement date was R$961 (the financial expenses in 2004, resulting from a decrease in the value of the US dollar was R$2,313).

Freelance S.A.

     Revenues and Accounts Receivable arising from transactions related to the use of telecommunications services: the receivable balance amounts to R$769 (as compared to R$54 receivable on December 31, 2004) the recognized revenue in income was R$776 (as compared to R$233 in 2004).

IG Brasil

     Revenues and Accounts Receivable arising from transactions related to the use of telecommunications services: the balance receivable is R$733 (as compared to R$1,720 receivable on December 31, 2004) and the revenue recognized in the income was R$10,672 (as compared to R$860 in 2004) and operating expenses R$71.

BrT Multimídia

     Accounts Payable, Revenues and Expenses arising from transactions related to telecommunications services: the balance payable is R$10,772 (as compared to R$15,918 payable on December 31, 2004). The amounts recorded in income for 2005 represented Operating Revenues of R$169 (as compared to R$15 in 2004) and Operating Expenses of R$66,711 (as compared to R$47,130 in 2004).

123


Table of Contents

Other Related Parties Transactions

     Due to the existence of common partners in our control chain and the companies mentioned below, the operations among them may be classified, pursuant to CVM Resolution #26/86, as “related-parties transactions”.

  • Telemig Celular:We maintain agreements with Telemig Celular related to the operation of telecommunications services, comprised of CSP 14 – Operator Selection Code, infrastructure rental and co-billing agreements. The amount receivable resulting from these agreements is R$4,228 (as compared to R$13,121 in 2004). The amounts recorded in income for 2005 are represented by operating revenues of R$151 (as compared to R$276 in 2004) and operating expenses of R$32,979 (as compared to R$27,102 in 2004).

  • Amazônia Celular:We maintain agreements with Amazônia Celular concerning operation of telecommunications services, comprised of CSP 14 – Operator Selection Code and co-billing agreements. The amount receivable resulting from these contracts and agreements is R$258 (as compared to R$2,748 in 2004). The amounts recorded in income for 2005 are represented by operating expenses of R$6,101 (as compared to R$9,236 in 2004).

  • TIM Celular: We maintain agreements with and TIM’s cell phone companies concerning the operation of telecommunications services, comprised of lease of means and co-billing agreements, as well as relationships resulting from CSP. The amount payable resulting from these transactions is R$38,296. The amounts recorded in income for 2005 are represented by operating revenues of R$152,611 and operating expenses of R$516,048.

  • Telecom Capital Fund:Based on the information made available to our management in December 2005, it was concluded that in 2003 we had invested funds in Telecom Capital Fund (“TCF”), an investment fund created in Curacao, in the Netherlands Antilles, with the purpose of “obtaining return rates above the average with moderate risk to investors” by means of investments in “infrastructure in the Latin America focused on telecommunications, Internet and data applications.” As the single provider of the fund, we contributed eighty-four million US dollars (US$ 84,000,000.00) purportedly to enable an investment in promissory notes of MetroRED, subsequently used for conversion into shares, and of Highlake International Business Company Ltd. (“Highlake”), by means of remuneration of the Libor rate plus 1.5% p.a., with the debtor, Highlake, having the option of repaying the debt in cash or of converting the debt into shares. With this investment, Highlake acquired the interest held by Telesystem International Wireless Latin America (“TIW”) in the capital of Telpart Participações S.A., parent company of the holding companies Telemig Celular Participações S.A. and Tele Norte Celular Participações S.A. Concerning Highlake, we have learned that Opportunity Fund has a 95% interest in Highlake. In view of the interest of Opportunity Fund in the Company’s control chain, these operations may be classified, under the terms of the CVM Resolution # 26/86, as “related-parties transactions.” In March 2005, Highlake settled the promissory note held by TCF, without the conversion of the shares and subsequently the discontinuance of the Fund was requested. On April 25, 2005 the balance of the fund quotas was redeemed, in the amount of R$137,976. In 2005, until the redemption date, we recorded a financial loss of R$640, motivated by the exchange loss variation of the US dollar in the respective period. In 2004, due to same reasons, a financial loss of R$15,174 was recorded.

  • Supportcomm S.A.:Between 2001 and 2005, we entered into five agreements with Supportcomm S.A. (“Supportcomm”) for the supply of material, platforms and technology services, at the total amount of R$59,585, out of which R$45,176 has already been paid. In analysis of the ownership structure of Supportcomm, a 30% interest of Megapart Participações was identified, a company which has Opportunity Fund as partner, with an interest of nearly 100%. In view of the interest of Opportunity Fund in our control chain, these operations may be classified, pursuant to CVM
    Resolution #26/86, as “related-parties transactions.”

  • Acquisition of IG Cayman Equity Interest:On July 26, 2005, our subsidiary BrT SCS Bermuda acquired 3,750,500 class A common shares and 6,249,848 class B common shares issued by IG
    Cayman. This equity interest was acquired from the shareholders Opportunity Fund, Vicência Participações Ltda. and Global Investments and Consulting. Inc., companies with common partners in our control chain. The amount of the acquisition, representing 25.6% of the capital stock of IG Cayman, corresponded to R$68,647.

124


Table of Contents

ITEM 8. Financial InformationFINANCIAL INFORMATION

Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information

     See Item 18 "Financial“Item 18. Financial Statements."

106


Table of Contents

Legal Proceedings

Breakup of Telebrás

     The legality of the breakup of Telebrás and privatization of Telebrás was challenged in numerous legal proceedings, the greatand, although a majority of whichthe claims have now been dismissed. A few, however,dismissed, a number are still pending. We believe that the ultimate resolution of those proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on our business or financial condition.

     We are a party to certain legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business, including civil, administrative, tax, social security and labor proceedings. We have provided for or deposited in court amounts to cover our estimated losses due to adverse legal judgments. We believe that such actions, if decided adversely to our company,us, are not likely to have a material adverse effect on our business or financial condition.

     Telebrás, our legal predecessor, is a defendant in a number of legal proceedings and is subject to certain other claims and contingencies. Under the terms of the breakup of Telebrás, liability for any claims arising out of acts committed by Telebrás prior to the effective date of the breakup of Telebrás remains with Telebrás, except for labor and tax claims (for which Telebrás and the 12 new holding companies into which it was broken-up are jointly and severally liable by operation of law) and any liability for which specific accounting provisions have been assigned to us. Our management believes that the chances of any such claims materializing and having a material adverse financial effect on our companyus are remote.

Administrative Claim Before Anatel

     Embratel has filed an administrative claim against our company before Anatel challenging the legality of an association entered into by our company and other regional fixed-line companies for the rendering of 800 national services. Embratel alleged that such an association violated applicable telecommunications legislation. Anatel decided for the dismissal of the administrative claim, since the association was not awarded to render the 800 national services in this specific case.

Antitrust Proceedings

     In 2004, Embratel and other companies filed administrative complaints before Anatel, the Secretariat of Economic Law of the Ministry of Justice and CADE charging us with carrying out cartel-like practices with Telemar and Telefônica. We were only allowed to start operating outsidenica in violation of our concession area after January 19, 2004, following Anatel's certification that we anticipated our 2003 universalization targets.the antitrust laws of Brazil. While we believe these antitrust complaints are groundless and baseless, an adverse decision by CADEthe Administrative Council of Economic Defense (CADE) could result in the imposition of a penalty against us fromthat could be assessed between 10%-30% of our total annual revenue.revenue in year 2003, the period immediately before the complaint.

LaborLabor-Related Legal Proceedings

     At December 31, 2004,2005, contingent liabilities for laborlabor-related legal proceedings infor which the risk of loss was considered "probable" amounted to approximately R$414.2million.564.1 million. At December 31, 2004,2005, contingent liabilities for laborlabor-related legal proceedings in which the risk of loss was considered "possible" amounted to approximately R$649.3413.7 million. As of December 31, 2004,2005, we were involved in approximately 22,310 labor17,853 labor-related legal proceedings, 8,0287,894 of which were brought against CRT. The estimated total amount involved in these proceedings is approximately R$1,228.8168 million.

     In 2004, despite the fact we had2005, there was an increase in the total number of labor legal proceedings, there was a decrease in laborlabor-related contingent liabilities infor which the risk of loss was considered "probable" in the amount of R$9.8151.3 million. This decreaseincrease was mainly due to (i) revaluation of the efforts we made to reach an agreementcontingent risks in several labor legalconnection with the labor-related proceedings specially those related to labor class actions brought against the Rio Grande do Sul branch (former CRT) and to(ii) monetary adjustments related to our re-evaluationreevaluation of our labor contingent liabilities.

Our laborlabor-related legal proceedings are based mainly on claims arising from:

107125


Table of Contents

  • from our performance bonus plan;

  • plan, employee promotions;
  • promotions, dangerous work conditions;
  • overtime;
  • conditions, overtime, subsidiary liability;
  • productivity;
  • liability, productivity, recognition of employment relationship;
  • reinstatement;relationship, reinstatement, and
  • voluntary severance plans.

     As the successor of Telepar, we were the defendant in a civil public action brought by the Attorney General for Labor Matters of Curitiba (Ministério Público doTrabalhoCuritiba) based on our dismissal of a large number of employees aged 40 years or over (with an average of more than 20 years'years of seniority) under our restructuring program. During 2001, a preliminary judgment was entered inissued on this matter ordering the reinstatement of the dismissed employees and dismissing all claims for indemnification. We have appealed this judgment to theTribunal Regional do Trabalho (“Regional Labor Court”) by means of a specific interlocutory appeal and the preliminary judicial order was revoked.overruled. The civil public action was dismissed and the Attorney General for Labor Matters of Curitiba filed an appeal with theTribunal Regional do Trabalho ("Regional Labor Court"). The appeal court ordered the rehiring of the dismissed employees. Both parties filed a review appeal (as the Attorney General filed an appeal pleading the reintegration of the dismissed employees, instead of the rehiring) to theTribunal Superior do Trabalho ("Superior Labor Court") and we are still awaiting a decision ofon this matter. ConsideringIn the event that we lose on appeal, we expect that the appeal court ruling ordering us to rehire the dismissed employees would be upheld. Since the rehiring of such employees, as opposed to their reinstatement, will have effectseffect only as of effective rehiring,the date they are rehired, we do not expect to be ordered to pay any costs relatedcompensation to this action.such dismissed employees during the period from their dismissal until the date they are rehired.

     WeAs successor of Telesc, we are the defendant in a labor claim filed by 1,478 employees in 1984, requesting the payment of salary differences due to theour failure in complyingto comply with the "Company Internal Rules,"Rules" that were in place at that time, which established different compensation criteria depending on an employee's seniority. In 1988, a judgment was entered inrendered on this matter ordering the payment of such differences. Since the judgment was rendered, the parties have been discussing the values involved in the action. In order to settle the values involved, a specific appeal was filed towith the Regional Labor Court, which ordered the exclusion of the employees who were hired after October 1976. The Regional Labor Court ruled that only 818 employees are entitled to the claim, excluding 660 other claimants.assert a claim. The court's appointed expert found that our exposure was equal to R$144 million, and the company is challengingwe challenged this calculation through anagravo de petição ("a specific interlocutory appeal in the execution phase").phase, which we filed on May, 2005. Subsequently, the parties agreed to settle the matter individually and, as of December 2004, we had settled with 615 employees for approximately R$53 million (including taxes and contributions)social security contributions to the National Social Security Institution). We estimate that we may still incur approximately R$24 million in liability as not all employees are interested in amicable settlements. This estimate considers the total amount to be paid if we fail to set forth new settlements with the employees and it includes the legal costs and social security contributions.

     In 1984, 1,480 employees filed a labor claim against us requesting the payment of differences due to theunder our profit sharing bonus.bonus plan in effect since 1970 and that was suppressed by the company in that year. The Labor Judge dismissed the labor claim in 1985. An appeal filed to the Regional Labor Court modified theoverruled that decision, ordering the payment of the profit sharing.sharing (the amount calculated by then is for historical purposes only and it is presently outdated). Telesc (predecessor of Brasil Telecom; currently our branch in the State of Santa Catarina) filed a review appeal (recurso de revista) to the Superior Labor Court and also to theSupremo Tribunal Federal ("Supreme Court"), but the Regional Labor Court’s decision was confirmed.upheld. In 1990, anwe entered into a settlement agreement was settled with the employees in order to payregarding the profit sharing. In 1995, a Governmental Resolution N. 10 was issued, which establishes a new method to calculate the profit sharing plan. Such criteria was not favorable to the employees when compared with the settlement agreement and, as a result, Telesc did not pay the profit sharing as agreed to but instead began to pay as established in the Resolution. In 1997, SINTTELthe Labor Union (SINTTEL) and part of the employees requested the reopening of the labor claim to execute the differences of the profit sharing payments. The Labor Judge did not accept the request. However, the Regional Labor Court admitted the employees' request. In 1998, Telesc filed a review appeal, which was not accepted by the Superior Labor Court. In 2003, Telesc filed arecurso extraordinário ("an extraordinary appeal")appeal to the Supreme Court, which was not accepted. Telesc filed anagravo de instrumento ("interlocutory appeal")appeal before the Supreme

108


Table of Contents

Court in April 2003, which was not accepted. The labor claim was returned to the lower Labor Judge for the executory phase. We estimateestimated that we would incur a cost of approximately R$20.6 million, based on our evaluation that 703 employees are eligible for indemnification with respect to the years of 1996 through 1998. However, on January 2005, the lower Labor Judge confirmed the court's expert opinion ofthat 1,098 employees are to be indemnified in thefor a total amount of approximately R$64 million with respect to the years offrom 1996 to 2003 (including a penalty for not have been fulfilled the first agreement of R$12 million). On November 23, 2005 the labor court determined the inclusion in the calculation of amounts due until 2005 to the employees that still work for us. The amount of R$61,753,916.54 is provisioned for

126


Table of Contents

this contingency. We filed an appeal against such court decision and are currently in negotiations to settle the entire case.

     In 1991, SINTTEL filed a labor claim against Teleron, seeking the payment of a hazard conditions bonus for 123 employees. The Labor Judge pronounced a decision granting SINTTEL requests. The decision was maintained by theTribunal Regional do Trabalho ("Regional Labor Court") and by theTribunal Superior do Trabalho ("Superior Labor Court") and became unappeallable on 1995. The Company filed a Rescissory Action, pursuing the annulment of the sentenced action, based on technical problems during the expert examination. The decision was rendered and was considered with grounds by the Regional Labor Court, in 1997. Due to this decision, SINTTEL filed a Review Appeal for the Superior Labor Court, which was accepted on April 2004. The Company filed an Extraordinary Appeal to the Supreme Court, which was dismissed. The Company filed anagravo de instrumento("interlocutory appeal") before the Supreme Court, which was not accepted. The Company filed anagravo regimental ("special appeal according to specific court regulations"), which is pending decision.

     The writ of execution stayed, due the first decision in the Rescissory action, was resumed. The calculation of the award provided by the court was on the amount of R$23 million, and the Company filed a motion to stay the execution, which was partially accepted. The company filed an Ordinary Appeal to the Regional Labor Court, which is pending judgment. The company made adepósito judicial ("deposit in court") of an amount equivalent to R$23 million. On May 23, 2005, the Company settled the entire case for R$22.8 million (including taxes and contributions). As of the date of filing of this annual report, the parties are waiting for the Judge’s final approval of the settlement, which is pending decision.

Legal Tax Proceedings

Application of ICMS on Cellular Activation and Other Fees

     In June 1998, the governments of certain Brazilian States approved an Agreement (Convênio 69/98) to interpret existing Brazilian tax law to broaden the application of the state value added tax, ICMS, effective July 1, 1998, to certain services, including cellular activation and installation services, to which the ICMS had not previously been applied.

     The administrative tax authorities in the Federal District and in the States of Santa Catarina, Tocantins, Acre and Rio Grande do Sul have assessed our companyus on this issue regarding the period of five years preceding June 30, 1998. However, our companywe obtained favorable judicial decisions confirming that ICMS cannot be applied retroactively to services rendered during the period prior to the Convênio 69/98 (June 30, 1998).

     We believe that any such attempt by the governments of these States to extend the scope of the ICMS to apply it retroactively to services that are supplementary to basic telecommunications services is illegal and unconstitutional because:

(a)     Their interpretation would subject certain services which are not telecommunications services to taxation; and
(b)     Taxes may not be applied retroactively.

     Additionally, the statute of limitation for the ICMS tax is of five years, which means that the State governments can only charge taxes within a five-year-period starting from the tax-triggering event. Because of that, the tax authorities could not charge the company for the services rendered during the five years preceding June 30, 1998, since the term of the statute of limitation has expired.

109


Table of Contents

Recently, the STJ decided in the Special Appeal 402.047 -MG and the Special Appeal 330.130 -DF that no ICMS should be levied on the cellular installation and activation services established in Convênio 69/98. However, we have knowledge of other judicial decision unfavorable to the taxpayer. Even though, the STJ has not granted a final and uniform decision on this issue, we estimate a probable possibility of a favorable decision to the taxpayer, which means a low likelihood of disbursement in our proceedings. With regard to the payments of ICMS tax on such cellular activation and installation services as of July 1, 1998, we have filed judicial claims (declaratory actions) in the States of our region to avoid such collections. As of December 2004, we deposited in court approximately R$202.9276.9 million in order to guaranteesuspend the judicial discussionliability of said ICMS without the application of interest and fees. In caseIf the legality ofConvênio 69/98 is confirmed by Superior Courts, the deposited amount will be converted into revenue to the state treasury department without new disbursements having to be made by the company.us. However, if the Superior Courts consolidate the opiniondecide that the terms ofConvênio 69/98 are illegal, the deposited amount may be returned to us.

Services Tax Applying onApplication to Complementary Telecommunications servicesServices

     Several municipal governments assessed our companyus in order to collect the Services Tax ("ISS") on the complementary telecommunications services, such as call ID, alarm clock, answering machine and other similar services. These assessments constitute a relevant contingency for our company. The company understands that these complementary telecommunications services, which are considered accessory services in the telecommunications services, are subject to ICMS instead of the ISS. Consequently, our company is not paying the ISS on these services. Our company's legal counsel estimates as reasonable the likelihood of disbursement considering the absence of judicial precedent in superior judicial courts.us. As of December 2004,2005, the amount of this tax contingency that corresponds to a possible contingency is approximately R$268.6339.9 million. This amount is not provisioned in our company's balance sheet.

State Value-Added Tax Credits

     Several States Treasury Department assessed us regarding our company in order to discuss the use of the ICMS tax credits. Our companycredits, specially: (i) the recognition of ICMS in the acquisition of consumption material; and (ii) reversal of ICMS debits accounted when rendering communication services. We presented administrative and judicial defenses against the assessments. In some administrative proceedings, the decision at the first administrative level was unfavorable to the company.us. According to the State tax authorities, the procedure adopted by our companyus for registering the ICMS credits is not in accordance with the law. On the other hand, our company's legal counsel understands that the likelihood of disbursement is low in the judicial level since ICMS tax credits are guaranteed by the Brazilian Constitution. As of December 2004,2005, the amount involved in the discussionmatter that corresponds to a possible contingency is approximately R$455.1606.6 million. This amount is not provisionedThe cases in our company's balance sheet.which management assesses the Company’s chance of success as remote have been provided for, and amounts to R$78.6 million as of December 31, 2005.

State Value-Added Tax Applying onApplication to International Telecommunications servicesServices

     Several StatesStates’ Treasury Departments assessed our company in order to collectus regarding collection of the ICMS tax on international telephone calls. The tax authorities understandstate that international telephone calls are services rendered in Brazil and are subject to ICMS tax since the request and the payment for the services are executed in Brazil. Our companyWe presented administrative defenses against the assessments. As of December 2004,2005, the amount involved in the administrative proceedings that corresponds to a possible contingency is approximately R$186.5224.3 million. This amount is not provisioned in the company'sour balance sheet. Our company's legal counsel understands the ICMS tax is not applicable to the international telephone call services and estimates the likelihood

127


Table of disbursement as low.

Contents

Social Security Contribution ApplyingApplication on Several Issues

     The National Welfare Agency filed administrative and judicial proceedings against our company in orderus to collect the Social Welfare Contribution ("INSS"), which is levied on payments of salaries, on several types of paymentscommissions, vacations, overtime allowance made to our company's employees. Our companyWe presented defenses against all these proceedings. As of December 2004,2005, the amount involved in those proceedings that corresponds to a possible contingency is approximately R$459.1562 million notthat is partially provisioned in the company'sour balance sheet. Our company's legal counsel understands thatThe cases in which management assesses the possibilityCompany’s chance of success is reasonable in the judicial level, which means that the likelihoodas remote have been provided for, and amounts to R$82 million as of disbursement is low.

110


Table of ContentsDecember 31, 2005.

State Value-Added Tax Applying onApplication to Sale of Pre-paid Telephone Cards

     The State Treasury Department of the States of Mato Grosso and Tocantins assessed our company to collectus regarding collection of the ICMS on salesales of pre-paid telephone cards used in public telephones. Our companyWe presented administrative defenses against all these assessments. As of December 2004,2005, the amount involved in the administrative proceedings that correspondcorresponds to a possible contingency is approximately R$29.3 million. This amount is not provisioned in the company'sour balance sheet. Our company's legal counsel understands the possibility of success is reasonable in the judicial level, which means that the likelihood of disbursement is low.

Costs of the Social Contribution on Gross Revenue Transferred to the Users of the Telecommunications services

     TheSeveral civil class action wasactions were filed against us by a federal prosecutor and ANDEC ("Associação Nacional de Defesa dos Consumidores de Cartão de Crédito"dito") in order to suspend the transfer of the cost of the PIS/COFINS to the users of the telecommunications services. Our company presented defenses against the proceedings. As of December 2004,2005, the amount involved in these judicial proceedings that correspondcorresponds to a possible contingency is approximately R$278.5 million. This amount is not provisionedincluded in the company'scontingent liabilities shown on our balance sheet. Our company's legal counsel understands the possibility of success is reasonable in the judicial level, which means that the likelihood of disbursement is low.

REFIS

     The REFIS (the "REFIS") is a program created by the Federal government in order to provide the opportunity to legal entities to pay their debts related to taxes on an installment schedule (60 installments) with a 40% reduction of the applicable penalty fee. Such program is managed by the Federal Revenue Service and the National Welfare Agency ("INSS").

     On November 16, 2000, the companywe filed thea request to include in the REFIS program itsour debts related to the taxes managed by the INSS. As of December 2004,2005, the REFIS account indicated an amount of R$186.6110.9 million. However, this amount does not considerencompass the tax credits intended to be used by the companyus to offset debts included in the REFIS. Therefore, whenwhether the Federal Revenue Service definitely ratifies the offsetting of the tax credits against the debts therequested by us, there will be no remaining amount willto be approximately R$2.9 million.paid concerning the REFIS account. In the calculation ofcalculating the total amount included in the REFIS (allowed by law) the company used, we considered both (i) a 40% of reduction of the penalty fee applied issued in the assessments and (ii) itsour own and third partiesparty’s net operating losses, to offset with the tax debts included in the REFIS.

PAES

     The PAES is a program created by the Federal government in order to provide the opportunity to taxpayers to pay their debts (related to taxes managed by the INSS) in 120 installments. In 2004, the companyWe filed the request to pay in installments R$42.5 million ofthe federal tax debts in installments in 2004. The amount was consolidated by the Brazilian Internal Revenue and asthe current balance of the debts is R$213.2 million. As of December 2004,2005, there are 104were 90 outstanding installments.installments of R$2.4 million each. Notwithstanding the proposition of an administrative request questioning the part of the value (R$184.7 million) included in the PAES by the Brazilian Internal Revenue, all the installments have been paid regularly.

Civil Legal Proceedings

     At December 31, 2004,2005, we had provisions offor approximately R$214.7273.3 million of contingent liabilities for civil lawsuits classified as "probable" risks.risks, as compared to R$214.7 million at December 31, 2004. The increase in "probable"

128


Table of Contents

"probable" contingent liabilities was primarily due to an increase of R$50.7 million in the civil lawsuits proposedmonetary adjustments, new law suits filed against our company and related to consumer rights' claims, monetary adjustmentsus and revaluation of the risks of losses in such legal proceedings, offset by payments for settled claims amounting to R$44.788.7 million. At December 31, 2004,2005, contingent liabilities for civil lawsuits classified as "possible" risks amounted to approximately R$1,751.4 million, as compared to R$1,006.3 million.million at December 31, 2004. The increasein "possible" contingent liabilities was primarily due to an increase of R$231.0 million in the lawsuits arising from consumer rights' claims, monetary adjustments, new law suits filed against us, and the revaluation of the risks of losses in such legal proceedingsproceedings. The major part of the new law suits refer to consumers claims and claims for the capitalization process, where a higher numberdistribution of shares and amountfor persons included in the programs established by the government in the past pursuant to which acquirers of dividends is requested.fixed line telephone services had rights to shares of the telephone services providers.

     Most of the civil suits filed against us would not, if determined in a manner adverse to our company,us, have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition. The most significant civil suits against us are the following:

111


Table of Contents

CRT

     As a result of the merger of CRT into TBS, which was immediately followed by the merger of TBS into the companyus on December 28, 2000, we replaced CRT and TBS in all litigation in which they were parties.

     We replaced CRT in various lawsuits related to the CRT privatization process. The greater partmajority of these lawsuits claimsclaim a declaration annullingannulling. Lawsuits filed on 1998 and 1999 aimed at challenging the sale of the capital of the former CRT, illegality of the invitation to bid no. 04/98, miscalculation on the number of shares on sale, defects on the general meetings approving the shares sale, and all acts resulting therefrom.errors on the shares value assessment. The preliminary motions in these lawsuits were dismissed, allowing the privatization process and consequent sale of the CRT to proceed and, subsequently, CRT was merged into the company.us. Currently, we are awaiting a decision on the merits in only a few suits; in other lawsuits, the merits have already been considered and final decisions in favor of the companyus have been issued. The company classifiesWe classify the risk of loss of these lawsuits as remote.

     As CRT's successor, we are the defendant in various lawsuits brought by telephone subscribers in various districts of the State of Rio Grande do Sul, in which the plaintiffs claim the right to shares by virtue of financial participation agreements entered into with the companyCRT pursuant to Ministry of Communications Order 1.361/76, or damages in an amount equivalent to the shares. The value of the shares was calculated based on their equity value, which is the result of CTR’s net worth divided into the number of issued and outstanding shares, taking into consideration the net worth of the financial statements preceding each subscription of shares. The plaintiffs allege that the shares that were subscribed for in their names were delivered without taking into consideration monetary correction of the amount they had paid to acquire the telephone lines. The Appeal Court of Rio Grande do Sul has taken the position that the procedure adopted by CRT in issuing shares under the community telephone programs pursuant to Ministry of Communications Order 1.361/76 was incorrect and that the 12-month subscription period in a period of high inflation was abusive. The Appeal Court did not, however, address the argument raised by the company, to the effect that the matters at issue are financial and corporate in nature, in which case the Consumer Defense Code would not apply and, as a consequence, a large number of the claims would be prescribed. Accordingly,We have not been ordered to subscribe or to issue shares in favour of the company has beenlawsuits plaintiffs, although we were found liable to subscribe shares in favorfor indemnification of the plaintiffsclaimants by paying in cash the lawsuits relating to Order 1.361/76, although we believe that it is possible that the decisions will be overturned in the higher courts.judgment award. These lawsuits are at different stages: some are still at first instance, some are on appeal in the Appeal Court and some are at the second appellate instance in the Superior CourtSCJ. On December 31, 2005, the total amount of Justice.the contingent liabilities related to civil legal proceedings involving our branch located in the State of Rio Grande do Sul was R$1,837.0 million. Of such amount, R$135.5 million was related to the proceedings in which the risk of loss was considered “probable,” R$187.7 million was related to the proceedings in which the risk of loss was considered “remote.”

     As theCRT’s successor, of CRT, we are the defendant in a Civil Public Action brought by the Federal Attorney General (Ministério Público) for Rio Grande do Sul against CRT claiming indemnification of amounts paid by customers as a result of allegedly abusive commercial practices in connection with 0900/900 telephone services. An adverse judgment has been issued against us in this action. Although the court did not award any damages in this action, it enjoined us from offering 0900/900 telephone services and from disconnecting service to customers for the non-payment of any 0900/900 services incurred prior to the date of the judgment. Both parties filed appeals against the decision at first instance, and ours was partially successful, with the result that the amount of the daily fine for

129


Table of Contents

non-compliance with the judgment was reduced, while the appeal by the Attorney General was dismissed. Special and extraordinary appeals have been filed, and final decision on those appeals is still pending. Customers seeking to recover damages in this matter will have to bring their own separate actions. Our ultimate liability will depend on how many of our customers initiate and succeed in any such proceedings. Notwithstanding the adverse results of the Public Civil Action, it is impossible to assess our potential exposure in this regard.

     Splice do Brasil – Telecomunicações e Eletrodomésticos Ltda. has filed a lawsuit against us to collect amounts owed under equipment supply agreements. The court's decision was favorable to the plaintiff and the lawsuit is currently in the execution phase. We offered one of our telecommunications plantplants in the State of Paraná in exchange as security for execution of the judgment and at the same time filed a motion to stay execution, which was denied at first instance. We appealed and the decision denying our motion to stay execution was overturned. Our motion to stay execution is now proceeding, and in view of the divergence between our calculations of the amount owed and Splice do Brasil's, an accounting expert was appointed by the court to determine the amount under execution. The expert has already presented its appraisal report, which sets the amount of the claim at R$34.134.0 million, as of DecemberMarch 31, 2004.2006. The ratification of the appraisal by the court is still pending. We have already provisionedreserved for this probable contingency inon our balance sheet.

Community Telephone Program – CTP

     As Telems', Telegoias', and Telemat's successor, we are a defendant in various lawsuits dealing the implementation of the Community Telephone Program (CTP) in the State of Mato Grosso do Sul, Goiás, Tocantins, and Mato Grosso. The CTP was a type of financing for installing or extending telephone lines. In the greater part of

112


Table of Contents

the lawsuits, the claims are for shares in the telephone service operator, as well as damages and dividends, as a return on the investment that customers made for the installation of telephone lines under the CTP.

     Half of all the lawsuits brought in connection with the CTP are based on agreements with subscribers that provided for payment in shares of the former Telems, Telegoias and Telemat while the other half are based on agreements that do not provide for such payment. The risk of loss in the lawsuits filed against Telems is classified as possible and with respect to the lawsuits based on agreements that provide for payment in shares, an amount of approximately R$8 million has been registered as funds that may be capitalized in order to issue shares to plaintiffs if the company iswe are unsuccessful. The risk of loss in the lawsuits filed against Telegoiás and Telemat is classified as probable and an amount of R$17 million has been provisionedincluded in our reserve for contingent liabilities both for lawsuits based on agreements with subscribers that provided for payment in shares and for lawsuits based on agreements that do not provide for such payment.

     Under the terms of the split-up of Telebrás which occurred on February 28, 1999, Telebrás remains exclusively liable for obligations of any kind (including, without limitation, labor, pension, civil, tax, environmental and commercial obligations) related to acts or events occurring on or prior to the date of approval of the split-up, with the exception of contingent liabilities for which provision was expressly made in the documents attached to the valuation report.

     We argued that we are not a proper party to the lawsuits, and our argument was accepted by the Fourth Civil Panel of the Appeal Court of Mato Grosso do Sul under a Motion for Clarification in the course of an appeal. Thus, we believe that we have good chances of reversing unfavorable decisions in the higher courts, upon confirmation of Telebrás' obligation to assume payment of any unfavorable judgment, in our stead.

Telephone Catalogues

     The Federal Attorney General for Rio Grande do Sul brought action to 18 (eighteen) Public Civil Actions pleading the publication and delivery of the Compulsory Catalogue of Residential Telephones for CTB users. Thirteen lawsuits out of these eighteen have had favorable temporary restraining orders to the Federal Attorney General, and six out of those thirteen lawsuits have had trial court judgments confirming the temporary restraining orders rendered and imposing fines against us. In view of these judgment awards, we have provisioned values in the amount of R$12.9 million in our balance sheets. The applicable appeals have been filed against that trial courts judgment and are still pending of appeals court decision.

130


Table of Contents

Stores

     In addition, the Federal Attorney General for Rio Grande do Sul filed 52 Public Civil Actions pleading the reopening of Public Attending Stores at the State of Rio Grande do Sul. Of these lawsuits, 39 have had trial court judgments confirming the temporary restraining orders imposing fines against us. In view of these judgment awards, we have provisioned values in the amount of R$15.5 million in our balance sheet. The applicable appeals have been filed against those trial courts judgments and are still pending of appeals court decision.

Disputes with and among entities that hold stakes in Brasil Telecomour Company

     WeUnder Opportunity-appointed management, we have instituted lawsuits to recover damages suffered as a result of actions taken by TII and the board members nominated by TII to our board of directors. As part of the negotiations relating to the Merger Agreement weentered into on April 28, 2005, our former management agreed to terminate these lawsuits.lawsuits without compensation. At the date of this annual report,hereof, certain of our indirect shareholders have brought lawsuits with regard to this termination of claims.claims and other agreements executed on April 28, 2005. We filed a complaint with the Brazilian Securities Commission charging prior management of managing our resources in businesses and operations with traces of controlling shareholder’s abuses, breaches of fiduciary duties, conflict of interests, violations of Brazilian Law and our By-Laws, in which are included the April 28, 2005 agreements.

     We also understand that there are legal proceedings pending relating to efforts by TII to resume a controlling position in our company. See Item 3 "Key“Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—Certain beneficial shareholders control a large percentage of our voting shares and their interests may conflict with the interests of our other shareholders, including minority shareholders." Disputes among our controlling shareholders and entities that manage our controlling shareholders have had and could in the future have a material adverse effect on our management and operations.

     On March 9, 2005, International Equity Investments, Inc,Inc. as the sole shareholder of CVC/Opportunity Equity Partners LP (since renamed Citigroup Venture Capital International Brazil, L.P,)- that– which holds a substantial indirect stake in Brasil Telecom Participações S.A. and Opportunitythrough its direct ownership in Zain, S.A., a company which integratesthat indirectly owns a majority of the controlling corporate structurevoting interests in Solpart, and therefore indirectly owns a majority of Brasil Telecom Participações S.A. and Brasil Telecom S.A. - ("CVC LP"), sentour voting shares – issued a public notice informing aboutregarding the oustingouster of CVC/Opportunity Equity Partners, Ltd (since renamed Opportunity Equity Partners, Ltd.)("CVC Ltd"), from the management of CVC LP, having designated as a substitute, a new company named Citigroup Venture Capital International Brazil LLC ("replaced by CVC International Brazil"). It wasBrazil. The notice also informedstated that CVC International Brazil entered into "shareholders´shareholders´ agreements with Investidores Institucionais FIA, Previ, Funcef and Petros – " which, according toregulating the notice, have full forceexercise of controlling rights in our company and effect conditioned to certain conditions, among which the implementationrestrictions on transfer of the designation of CVC International Brazil as the new manager of CVC LP.shares.

     On March 17, 2005, Brasil Telecom became aware that the United States District Court – Southern District of New York granted a preliminary injunction determining that(i) compelling CVC Ltd fileto register the change of the general partner of CVC LP from CVC Ltd to CVC International Brazil before the competent authorities of the Cayman Islands its substitution as general partnerand (ii) enjoining CVC Ltd from taking any action that would impair the value of CVC LP.

113


TableLP or that would interfere with the authority and power of ContentsCVC International Brazil.

     On March 18, 2005, Brasil Telecom took noticewe were apprised that CVC Ltd filed a formal statement before the competent authorities of the Cayman Islands in which it informs its substitution as general partner of CVC LP, in light of appointment of CVC International Brazil asregistered the new manager of CVC LP.substitution.

     On April 12, 2005, Anatel issued a decision approving among other things: (i) the replacement of CVC LtdOpportunity Ltd. by CVC International Brazil as managerthe general partner of CVC LP; (ii) the replacement of CVC/Opportunity Equity Partners Administradora de Recursos Ltda. by Angra Partners Consultoria Empresarial e Participações Ltda. as the new manager of CVC/Opportunity Equity Partners, FIA, now denominated Investidores Institucionais Fundo de Investimentos em Ações ("Investidores Institucionais FIA"), one of theFIA, an indirect controlling shareholdersshareholder of Brasil Telecom Participações S.A. and Brasil Telecom S.A.; and (iii) thecertain changes resulting from the Opportunity Zain S.A.Agreements entered into by CVC LP and Futeretel S.A. Shareholders' Agreements.Investidores Institucionais. This decision was published in the Federal Gazette (Diário Oficial) on April 14, 2005. On May 3, 2005, afterAfter reviewing our appeal filed by prior management related to Opportunity Ltd., Anatel maintainedupheld its April 12, 2005 decision.

     Banco Opportunity S.A. was ousted from the administration of Investidores Institucionais FIA, on October 6, 2003. Investidores Institucionais FIA's current administrator is Mellon Brascan Distribuidora de Títulos e Valores Mobiliários and its manager is Angra Partners Consultoria Empresarial e Participações Ltda. In consequenceConsequently,

131


Table of this event, Contents

Fundação 14 de Previdência Privada, successor to Fundação Sistel de Seguridade Social, brought an ordinary action before the 5th Federal Court of Rio de Janeiro against several defendants, andincluding CVM, seeking a declaration that the resolutions adopted at the Investidores Institucionais FIA's Unitholders Meeting held on October 6, 2003 were invalid, principally the resolution that ousted Banco Opportunity S.A. from administration of Investidores Institucionais FIA and, consequently, also ousted CVC/Opportunity Equity Partners Administradora de Recursos Ltda. as Investidores Institucionais FIA's manager. Recently,On July 12, 2005, Fundação 14 de Previdência Privada, successor of Fundação Sistel de Seguridade Social, broughtfiled a motion for precautionary relief before the 5th Federal Court of Rio de Janeiro as an incidental proceedingto abandon this lawsuit. Opportunity is still fighting to come back to the ordinary action against the same defendants, seeking to prevent any transactions involving the assetsmanagement of Investidores Institucionais FIA, including agreements forFIA.

     On July 27, 2005, at an Extraordinary General Shareholders’ Meeting, members of the sale, encumbrance and/or acquisitionBoard of interestsDirectors of Brasil Telecom Participações S.A. who were linked to the company’s former manager were dismissed from the Board. At a Board meeting held on August 25, 2005, a new Senior Management was elected, with the Technical Director remaining in place.

     At an Extraordinary General Shareholders’ Meeting held on September 30, 2005, the members of our Board of Directors were also dismissed, with new members being elected in their place. On the same date, at a meeting of the Board of Directors, it was decided to dismiss the Chairman then presiding, and to elect new members to the Senior Management, with the Network Officer being re-elected. These decisions were ratified by our Board of Directors at a meeting held on October 5, 2005.

     The process of replacing the directors and officers of Brasil Telecom Participações S.A. and Brasil Telecom S.A. was litigious, as evidenced by the fund. On April 13, 2005, a preliminary order was issued suspending the effects of any acts for the alienation or encumbrance of Investidores Institucionais FIA assets, or the acquisition of interestsseveral material facts released by the Fund until a subsequent decision,companies during 2005 and the various lawsuits filed by our former manager seeking to resume management of the companies, which will be issued after the defendants have submitted their arguments.are still ongoing.

Actions in Respect of Litigation Trust

     AnIn September 2003, the prior management team established an Irrevocable Trust Agreement and Declaration ("Trust"), was established in September 2003 for the benefit of Brasil Telecom, and transferred to protect the Trust our rights described in some of the lawsuits mentioned herein and in others which may yet be filed regarding the same general matters, to protect the rights claimed by the Company, considering the particularities that surround those lawsuits and rights.matters. By means of the execution of the Trust, Mr. Roberto Mangabeira Unger (Trustee)(the Trustee), was given the authority to lead the conduct of such proceedings, in court or out of court, in the manner that best suits theour interests, of Brasil Telecom,as the sole beneficiary of the Trust. The irrevocability of the Trust is meant to assure the powers and the autonomy necessary to enable the Trustee to guide the conduct of such lawsuits as he deems fit to be in the best interest of Brasil Telecom.

     Currently, thereThere is an administrative proceeding atbefore the CVM (Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commission) that deals with the creation of the Trust settled by Brasil Telecom in which there is a request to determine whether the executioncreation of suchthe Trust was an act of abusive control. Brasil Telecom and Brasil Telecom Participações S.A. have been providing all information requested in suchthis proceeding. In September 2004, theSuperintendência de Relações com Empresas – SEP (one of CVM's division)divisions) decided in favor of Brasil Telecom and Brasil Telecom Participações S.A, recognizing the effectiveness of the Trust in Brazil. ThisTo the best of our knowledge, this decision, however, is pending an appeal presented by the complainants before CVM's board of directors. In the year 2003, in the midst of a growing conflict involving the stakeholders of the companies that, directly or indirectly, are part of the shareholding structure of BrT – worsened by the increasingly opened attempt to takeover its control, the consummation of which could have hindered the normal development of the abovementioned legal proceedings, with new and irreparable damages to the Company -, its management, being aware of its legal duty to act diligently, decided to seek a legitimate way to isolate those disputes and protect the important underlying rights thereby pursued.

     The Trust is directed exclusively to the Company's interests. Its main objective is to isolate such disputes, including the legal proceedings against some of its main investors, from the conduct of the Company's business, as well as legitimately prevent potential harm to rights over which rests inexorable shareholders conflict.

114


Table of Contentsdirectors..

Basic Monthly Subscription Fees

     We are a defendant in a considerable number of lawsuits, both individual and collective, which contest our right to charge users of our fixed-line service a basic monthly subscription fee for continuous access to the service. These lawsuits have been stayed by a preliminary decision in the conflict of jurisdiction proceeding brought by Anatel before the Superior Court of Justice,SCJ, in which we submitted a brief. As a result, all preliminary and final decisions in the basic monthly subscription fee lawsuits were suspendedsuspended. The lawsuits are no longer submitted to a brief due to the conflict of jurisdiction litigation. The conflict of jurisdiction disputes has already been resolved and at present do not produce any effects. We consider our risk of losingthe lawsuits resumed their regular course. There are 65,000 lawsuits contemplating the monthly subscription fees issue. Of these lawsuits, 5,200 have had trial court judgments favorable to be remote.the temporary dismissal of the fees for fixed-line services access.

132


Table of Contents

Dividend Policy

     Pursuant to our by-laws, we are required to distribute as dividends, in respect of each fiscal year ending on December 31, to the extent amounts are available for distribution, an aggregate amount equal to at least 25% of Adjusted Net Income (as defined below) on such date (the "Mandatory Dividend"). The annual dividend distributed to holders of Preferred Shares (the "Preferred Dividend") has priority in the allocation of Adjusted Net Income.

115


Table of Contents

Remaining amounts to be distributed are allocated first to the payment of a dividend to holders of Common Shares in an amount equal to the Preferred Dividend, and subsequently distributed equally among holders of Preferred Shares and Common Shares. Under the Brazilian Corporation Law, a company is permitted to suspend the Mandatory Dividend in respect of common shares and preferred shares not entitled to a fixed or minimum dividend if its board of directors and fiscal council report toat the annual shareholders' meeting that the distribution would be incompatible with the financial circumstances of such company and the shareholders ratify this conclusion at the shareholders' meeting. In this case, (i) the board of directors must forward to the CVM within five days of the shareholders' meeting an explanation justifying the information transmitted at the meeting and (ii) the profits which were not distributed for such reason are to be recorded as a special reserve and, if not absorbed by losses in subsequent fiscal years, are to be paid as dividends as soon as the financial situation of such company permits. Our Preferred Shares are entitled to a minimum dividend and thus the Mandatory Dividend may be suspended only with respect to the Common Shares. See "—Priority and Amount of Preferred Dividends."

     Under our by-laws, we may pay dividends out of retained earnings or accumulated profits in any given fiscal year. For the purposes of the Brazilian Corporation Law, accumulated profits are defined as net income after income and social contribution taxes for such fiscal year, net of any accumulated losses from prior fiscal years and any amounts allocated to founders' shares, income bonds, employees' and management's participation in a company's profits. Retained earnings are defined as the amount of our net income in prior years that was not paid out as dividends in the year in which it was earned, but rather was retained in accordance with a proposal of the board of directors duly approved byat a shareholdersshareholders’ meeting.

     At each annual shareholders' meeting, our board of directors is required to recommend how net profits for the preceding fiscal year are to be allocated. Under the Brazilian Corporation Law, we are required to maintain a statutory reserve to which we must allocate 5.0% of net profits for each fiscal year until the amount of such reserve equals 20.0% of our paid-up share capital, (thewhich we refer to as the "Statutory Reserve").Reserve." This reserve can only be used to increase capital or offset accumulated losses. Net losses, if any, may be charged against the statutory reserve.

     The Brazilian Corporation Law also provides for two additional discretionary allocations of net profits that are subject to approval by shareholders at the annual shareholders' meeting. First, a percentage of net profits may be allocated to the contingency reserve for anticipated losses that are deemed probable in future years (the "Contingency Reserve"). Any amount so allocated in a prior year must be either (i) reversed in the fiscal year in which the loss was anticipated if such loss does not in fact occur or (ii) reversed in the event that the anticipated loss occurs. Second, if the amount of Unrealized Revenue (as defined below) exceeds the sum of (i) the statutory reserve (Reserva Legal),Statutory Reserve, (ii) the Contingency Reserve and (iii) retained earnings, such excess may be allocated to the reserve (the "Unrealized Revenue Reserve"). Such allocations may not hinder the payment of minimum dividends on our Preferred Shares. "Unrealized Revenue" is defined under the Brazilian Corporation Law as the sum of (i) the share of equity earnings of affiliated companies whichthat is not paid as cash dividends and (ii) profits from installment sales to be received after the end of the next succeeding fiscal year.

     For the purposes of the Brazilian Corporation Law, and in accordance with our by-laws, "Adjusted Net Income" is an amount equal to our net profit adjusted to reflect allocations to and reversion from (i) theReserva Legal; Statutory Reserve; (ii) the Contingency Reserve and (iii) the Unrealized Revenue Reserve.

     The amounts available for distribution are determined on the basis of our financial statements prepared in accordance with the Brazilian Corporation Law, which differ from financial statements, such as our Financial Statements included herein that are prepared using the constant currency method according to Brazilian GAAP.

133


Table of Contents

Priority and Amount of Preferred Dividends

     Our by-laws provide for a minimum non-cumulative dividend of Preferred Dividend equal to the greater of (i) 6.0% per year of the value of our total share capital divided by the total number of shares or (ii) 3.0% per year of the book value of our shareholders' equity divided by our total number of shares. As a result of such provision, holders of Preferred Shares are entitled to receive, in any year, distributions of cash dividends prior to the holders of Common Shares receiving any distribution of cash dividends in such year. In addition, distributions of cash dividends in any year are made:

116


Table of Contents

  • first, to the holders of Preferred Shares, up to the amount of the Preferred Dividend of our Preferred Shares for such year;
  • then, to the holders of Common Shares, until the amount distributed in respect of each Common Share is equal to the amount distributed in respect of each Preferred Share; and
  • thereafter, to the Common Shares and Preferred Shares on a pro rata basis.

     If the Mandatory Dividend in any year is less than or equal to the Preferred Dividend payable to the holders of Preferred Shares in such year, the holders of Common Shares will not be entitled to receive any cash dividends distributed by our companyus in such year, unless the holders of Common Shares approve dividends in excess of the Mandatory Dividend. In such circumstances, however, holders of Preferred Shares will be entitled to the amount available for payment of dividends up to an aggregate amount equal to the Preferred Dividend plus, in the event the Preferred Dividend is higher than the amount available for payment of dividends for such year, any retained earnings from previous years may be used to make up for such shortfall. If the Preferred Dividend is not paid for a period of three years, holders of Preferred Shares shall be entitled to full voting rights until such time as the minimum dividend is paid in full for any year.

Payment of Dividends

     We are required by Brazilian law (Law 6,404, article 132) and our by-laws to hold an annual shareholders' meeting within four months after the end of each fiscal year at which, among other things, an annual dividend may be declared by decision of the shareholders on the recommendation of our executive officers and our board of directors. The payment of annual dividends is based on our financial statements prepared for each fiscal year ended December 31 in accordance with Brazilian Corporation Law. Under Brazilian Corporation Law, dividends are required to be paid within 60 days following the date the dividend distribution is declared to shareholders of record, unless a shareholders' meeting resolution sets forth another date of payment, which must occur prior to the end of the fiscal year in which such dividend distribution was declared. A shareholder has a three-year period from the dividend payment date to claim dividends in respect of its shares, after which our company hashawse have no liability for such payment. Because our shares are issued in book-entry form, dividends with respect to any share are automatically credited to the account holding such share and no action is required on the part of the shareholder. We are not required to adjust the amount of paid-in capital for inflation. Annual dividends may be paid to shareholders of newly issued shares on a pro rata basis according to the date when the subscription price for such newly issued shares was paid to us.

     Shareholders who are not residents of Brazil must register with the Brazilian Central Bank in order for dividends, sales proceeds or other amounts with respect to their shares to be eligible to be remitted outside of Brazil. The Preferred Shares underlying the ADSs are held in Brazil byBanco Bradesco S.A., as agent for the Depositary, which has registered with the Brazilian Central Bank as the registered owner of our shares.

     Payments of cash dividends and distributions, if any, will be made in Brazilian currency toBanco Bradesco S.A.S.A., as custodian for our Preferred Shares represented by the ADSs, on behalf of the Depositary.Banco Bradesco S.A. will then convert such proceeds into U.S. dollars and will cause such U.S. dollars to be delivered to the Depositary for distribution to holders of ADSs. In the event that the custodian is unable to immediately convert the Brazilian currency received as dividends into U.S. dollars, the amount of U.S. dollars payable to holders of ADSs may be adversely affected by devaluations of the Brazilian currency that occur before such dividends are converted and remitted.

134


Table of Contents

Dividends in respect of our Preferred Shares paid to resident and non-resident shareholders, including holders of ADSs, are not currently subject to Brazilian withholding tax. See Item 10 "Additional“Item 10. Additional Information—Taxation—Brazilian Tax Considerations."

117ITEM 9. THE OFFER AND LISTING


Table of ContentsOffer and Listing Details

ITEM 9.The Offer and Listing
Offer and Listing Details

     Our Preferred Shares commenced trading separately on the Brazilian stock exchanges on July 10, 1992. The following table sets forth the reported high and low closing sale prices for our Preferred Shares on the São  Paulo Stock Exchange and the approximate average daily trading volume for the annual periods indicated. 


  Nominalreaisper 1,000 Preferred Shares  Average Daily 
   
  High  Low  Trading Volume 
    
      (millions of shares) 
Year-end 2000  19.62  11.88             379.2 
Year-end 2001  19.09  7.80             889.1 
Year-end 2002  14.54  9.48             814.3 
Year-end 2003  14.08  9.37  1,137.6 
Year-end 2004  18.00  9.13  1,335.0 
________________________________________
Source: São Paulo Stock Exchange
and the approximate average daily trading volume for the annual periods indicated.

  Nominalreaisper 1,000 Preferred Shares  Average Daily 
   
  High  Low  Trading Volume 
    
      (millions of shares)
Year-end 2001  19.09 7.80 889.1 
Year-end 2002  14.54 9.48 814.3 
Year-end 2003  14.08 9.37 1,137.6 
Year-end 2004  18.00 9.13 1,335.0 
Year-end 2005  12.59 8.14 1,647.2 

Source: Bloomberg

     The following table sets forth the reported high and low closing sale prices for our Preferred Shares on the São Paulo Stock Exchange and the approximate average daily trading volume for the quarterly periods indicated.

  Nominalreaisper 1,000 Preferred Shares  Average Daily 
   
  High  Low  Trading Volume 
    
      (millions of shares) 
First quarter 2003  12.39  9.37  978.1 
Second quarter 2003  14.00  11.17  1,175.6 
Third quarter 2003  14.50  11.16  1,043.7 
Fourth quarter 2003  16.08  13.16  1,353.1 
First quarter 2004  18.00  12.35  1,499.3 
Second quarter 2004  13.49  9.13  1,373.7 
Third quarter 2004  12.51  9.84  1,259.5 
Fourth quarter 2004  14.03  11.00  1,207.8 
First quarter 2005  13.32  10.61  1,626.4 
________________________________________
  Nominalreaisper 1,000 Preferred Shares  Average Daily 
   
  High  Low  Trading Volume 
    
      (millions of shares)
First quarter 2004  18.00 12.35 1,499.3 
Second quarter 2004  13.49 9.13 1,373.7 
Third quarter 2004  12.51 9.84 1,259.5 
Fourth quarter 2004  14.03 11.00 1,207.8 
First quarter 2005  11.89 9.71 1,626.4 
Second quarter 2005  10.62 8.78 1,901.8 
Third quarter 2005  10.14 8.14 1,624.7 
Fourth quarter 2005  12.59 9.58 1,428.6 
First quarter 2006  11.08 9.36 1,506.7 

Source: São Paulo Stock Exchange

Bloomberg

     The following table sets forth the reported high and low closing sale prices for our Preferred Shares on the São Paulo Stock Exchange and the approximate average daily trading volume for the monthly periods indicated.

  Nominalreaisper 1,000 Preferred Shares  Average Daily 
   
  High  Low  Trading Volume 
    
      (millions of shares) 
December 2004     14.03  12.45  1,282.3 
January 2005     13.32  10.68  1,111.7 
February 2005     11.96  10.69  1,485.6 
March 2005     12.93  10.61  2,209.6 
April 2005     11.60  9.59  2,338.0 
May 2005     10.22  9.26  1,790.4 
________________________________________
  Nominalreaisper 1,000 Preferred Shares  Average Daily 
   
  High  Low  Trading Volume 
    
      (millions of shares)
December 2005  12.59 10.05 1,658.7 
January 2006  10.44 9.54 1,691.9 
February 2006  11.08 9.36 1,567.3 
March 2006  11.03 9.79 1,368.6 
April 2006  11.08 9.86 1,857.0 
May 2006  10.99 8.78 1,647.2 

Source: São Paulo Stock Exchange

Bloomberg

135


Table of Contents

     Our ADSs, each representing 3,000 Preferred Shares, commenced trading on the New York Stock Exchange on November 16, 2001. The following table sets forth the reported high and low closing sale prices for

118


Table of Contents

our ADSs on the New York Stock Exchange and the approximate average daily trading volume for the annual periods indicated.

  Nominal U.S. dollars per ADS  Average Daily 
   
       High     Low  Trading Volume 
    
      (number of shares) 
Year-end 2002  18.78  8.20  5,394 
Year-end 2003  16.22  7.80  22,430 
Year-end 2004  19.19  8.46  28,921 
________________________________________
  
Nominal dollars per ADS 
 Average Daily 
   
  
High 
 
Low 
 
Trading Volume 
    
      (number of shares)
Year-end 2003  16.22 7.80 22,430 
Year-end 2004  19.19 8.46 28,921 
Year-end 2005  17.05 10.50 45,427 

Source: New York Stock Exchange

Bloomberg

     The following table sets forth the reported high and low closing sale prices for our ADSs on the New York Stock Exchange and the approximate average daily trading volume for the quarterly periods indicated.

  Nominal U.S. dollars per ADS  Average Daily 
   
  High  Low  Trading Volume 
    
      (number of shares) 
First quarter 2003  11.35  7.80  8,787 
Second quarter 2003  14.60  10.17  41,030 
Third quarter 2003  14.79  11.00  15,514 
Fourth quarter 2003  16.22  13.73  23,828 
First quarter 2004  19.19  12.52  23,300 
Second quarter 2004  14.10  8.46  25,717 
Third quarter 2004  12.20  9.70  26,314 
Fourth quarter 2004  15.83  11.56  40,303 
First quarter 2005  14.85  11.80  47,990 
________________________________________
  
Nominal dollars per ADS 
 Average Daily 
   
  High  Low  Trading Volume 
    
      (number of shares)
First quarter 2004  19.19 12.52 23,300 
Second quarter 2004  14.10 8.46 25,717 
Third quarter 2004  12.20 9.70 26,314 
Fourth quarter 2004  15.83 11.56 40,303 
First quarter 2005  14.85 11.80 37,889 
Second quarter 2005  13.63 11.37 28,413 
Third quarter 2005  14.33 10.50 61,689 
Fourth quarter 2005  17.05 12.74 53,490 
First quarter 2006  15.86 12.52 83,420 

Source: New York Stock Exchange

Bloomberg

     The following table sets forth the reported high and low closing sale prices for our ADSs on the New York Stock Exchange and the approximate average daily trading volume for the monthly periods indicated.

  Nominal U.S. dollars per ADS  Average Daily 
   
       High  Low  Trading Volume 
    
      (number of shares) 
December 2004  15.83  13.59  89,071 
January 2005  14.85  11.99  54,810 
February 2005  13.90  12.30  37,421 
March 2005  14.45  11.80  50,918 
April 2005  13.70  11.39  36,662 
May 2005  12.38  11.37  29,500 
  
Nominal dollars per ADS 
 Average Daily 
   
  
High 
 
Low 
 Trading Volume 
    
      (number of shares)
December 2005  17.05 12.74 60,776 
January 2006  13.80 12.91 100,835 
February 2006  15.77 12.64 78,774 
March 2006  15.86 13.11 72,117 
April 2006  15.70 13.90 60,147 
May 2006  15.92 11.25 100,064 

___________________________
Source: New York Stock ExchangeBloomberg

     There are no restrictions on ownership of our Preferred Shares or Common Shares by individuals or legal entities domiciled outside Brazil.

     The right to convert dividend payments and proceeds from the sale of shares into foreign currency and to remit such amounts outside Brazil is subject to restrictions under foreign investment regulations which generally require, among other things, that the relevant investments have been registered with the Brazilian Central Bank.Banco Bradesco S.A., as custodian for our Preferred Shares represented by the ADSs, has registered with the

119


Table of Contents

Brazilian Central Bank on behalf of the Depositary the Preferred Shares that it will hold. This enables holders of ADSs to convert dividends, distributions or the proceeds from any sale of such Preferred Shares, as the case may be,

136


Table of Contents

into U.S. dollars and to remit such U.S. dollars abroad. However, holders of ADSs could be adversely affected by delays in, or a refusal to grant any, required government approval for conversions of Brazilian currency payments and remittances abroad of the Preferred Shares underlying our ADSs.

     In Brazil, there are a number of mechanisms available to foreign investors interested in trading directly on the Brazilian stock exchanges or on organized over-the-counter markets.

     Under the regulations issued by the National Monetary Council, on January 26, 2000 ("Resolution 2,689"), foreign investors seeking to trade directly on a Brazilian stock exchange or on an organized over-the-counter market, must meet the following requirements:

  • Investments must be registered with a custody, clearing or depositary system authorized by CVM or the Brazilian Central Bank;
  • Trades of securities are restricted to transactions performed on the stock exchanges or organized over- the-counter markets authorized by the CVM;
  • A holder of ADSs must establish a representative in Brazil;
  • A holder of ADSs must complete a form annexed to the Resolution 2,689; and
  • A holder of ADSs must register with the CVM and register the inflow of funds with the Brazilian Central Bank.

     If these requirements are met, foreign investors will be eligible to trade directly on the Brazilian stock exchanges or on organized over-the-counter markets. These rules extend favorable tax treatment to all foreign investors investing pursuant to these rules. See Item 10 "Additional“Item 10. Additional Information—Taxation." These regulations contain certain restrictions on the offshore transfer of the title of the securities, except in the case of corporate reorganizations effected abroad by a foreign investor.

     A certificate of foreign capital registration has been issued in the name of the Depositary with respect to the ADSs and is maintained byBanco Bradesco S.A., as custodian for our Preferred Shares represented by the ADSs, on behalf of the Depositary. Pursuant to such certificate of foreign capital registration, we expect that Depositary will be able to convert dividends and other distributions with respect to the Preferred Shares represented by ADSs into foreign currency and remit the proceeds outside of Brazil.

     In the event that a holder of ADSs exchanges such ADSs for Preferred Shares, such holder will be entitled to continue to rely on the Depositary's certificate of foreign capital registration for five business days after such exchange, following which such holder must seek to obtain its own certificate of foreign capital registration with the Brazilian Central Bank. Thereafter, any holder of Preferred Shares may not be able to convert into foreign currency and remit outside Brazil the proceeds from the disposition of, or distributions with respect to, such Preferred Shares, unless such holder qualifies under Resolution 2,689 or obtains its own certificate of foreign capital registration. A holder that obtains a certificate of foreign capital registration will be subject to less favorable Brazilian tax treatment than a holder of ADSs. See Item 10 "Additional“Item 10. Additional Information—Taxation—Brazilian Tax Considerations."

     Under current Brazilian legislation, the Federal Government may impose temporary restrictions on remittances of foreign capital abroad in the event of a serious imbalance or an anticipated serious imbalance of Brazil's balance of payments. For approximately six months in 1989 and early 1990, the Federal Government froze all dividend and capital repatriations held by the Brazilian Central Bank that were owed to foreign equity investors in order to conserve Brazil's foreign currency reserves. These amounts were subsequently released in accordance with Federal Government directives. There can be no assurance that the Federal Government will not impose similar restrictions on foreign repatriations in the future.

120137


Table of Contents

Markets

     Our Preferred Shares are traded on theBolsa de Valores de São Paulo (the São Paulo Stock Exchange) under the symbol "BRTO4." At December 31, 2004,2005, we had approximately 454,160441,153 shareholders.

     Our Preferred Shares are also listed on the New York Stock Exchange in the form of ADSs under the symbol "BTM," with each ADS representing 3,000 Preferred Shares, issued by the Depositary pursuant to the deposit agreement, dated November 16, 2001, among our company,us, the Depositary and the registered holders and beneficial owners from time to time of ADSs. Preferred Shares represented by ADSs are held in custody in Brazil byBanco Bradesco S.A., as custodian for our Preferred Shares represented by the ADSs.

     Our Common Shares are also traded on the São Paulo Stock Exchange under the symbol "BRTO3."

Trading on the São Paulo Stock Exchange

     The São Paulo Stock Exchange is a non-profit entity owned by its member brokerage firms. Trading on the São Paulo Stock Exchange is limited to member brokerage firms and a limited number of authorized non-members. The stocks are traded on an electronic trading system allowing purchase or selling orders to be registered via computer terminals. The matching of offers and closing of business is automatically carried out by the São Paulo Stock Exchange has open outcry trading sessions and an automated system on which trading can be conducted during the trading day.Exchange’s computer. In 1999, the São Paulo Stock Exchange began operating an "after-market" which allows for limited after-hours trading to take place. There are no specialists or market makers for our shares on the São Paulo Stock Exchange. Trading in securities listed on the São Paulo Stock Exchange may be effected off the exchanges in certain circumstances, although such trading is very limited.

     Settlement of transactions is effected three business days after the trade date without adjustment of the purchase price for inflation. Payment for shares or delivery of shares are made through the facilities of separate clearinghouses for each exchange, which maintain accounts for member brokerage firms. The clearinghouse for the São Paulo Stock Exchange isCompanhia Brasileira de Liquidação e Custódia S.A. — CBLC.

     In order to better control volatility, the São Paulo Stock Exchange has adopted a "circuit breaker" system pursuant to which trading sessions may be suspended for a period of 30 minutes or one hour whenever the índicesindices of this stock exchange fall below the limit of 10.0% in relation to the index registered in the previous trading session.

     At December 31 2004,2005, the aggregate market capitalization of all of the companies listed on the São Paulo Stock Exchange was approximately R$904.91,128.5 billion. Although all the outstanding shares of an exchange-listed company may trade on the São Paulo Stock Exchange, in most cases less than half of the listed shares are actually available for trading by the public, the remainder being held by small groups of controlling persons that rarely trade their shares. For this reason, data showing the total market capitalization of São Paulo Stock Exchange tends to overstate the liquidity of the Brazilian equity securities market.

     The Brazilian equity market is relatively small and illiquid as compared to major world markets. In 2004,2005 the daily trading volume on the São Paulo Stock Exchange averaged approximately R$1,221.31,610.8 million. In 2004,2005, the ten most actively traded issues represented approximately 49.5%51.3% of the total trading in the cash market (standard lot) on the São Paulo Stock Exchange.

     Trading on the São Paulo Stock Exchange by nonresidents of Brazil is subject to certain limitations under Brazilian foreign investment legislation, which generally require, among other things, that the relevant investments have been registered with the Brazilian Central Bank, according to Resolution 2,689. See "—Offer and Listing Details."

The Special Corporate Governance Levels of the São Paulo Stock Exchange

     On December 11, 2000, the São Paulo Stock Exchange, or BOVESPA, launched three new listing segments designed for the trading of shares issued by publicly held companies: the Special Corporate Governance Level 1, the Special Corporate Governance Level 2 and the "Novo Mercado" of BOVESPA.

121138


Table of Contents

     Such new listing segments were designed for the trading of shares issued by companies that voluntarily undertake to abide by more stringent corporate governance practices and disclosure requirements than those currently requested by the Brazilian legislation.

     The inclusion of a company in any of the new segments implies the adhesioncompliance of such company towith a series of corporate governance rules known generally as "good corporate governance practices." These rules, which are consolidated in the listing regulations of the exchange, are meant to enhance the quality of information provided by Brazilian corporations and increase shareholder's rights, depending on the considered level.

     On March 27, 2002, our board of directors approved our adhesion tocompliance with the Special Corporate Governance Level 1 of BOVESPA. Our shares joined the Special Corporate Governance Level 1 of BOVESPA on May 9, 2002.

     In order to join the Special Corporate Governance Level 1, we agreed to undertake the following corporate governance practices:

1)     the maintenance of a free-float of at least 25.0% of our capital stock;
2)     holding of public offerings for share placements through mechanisms that favor capital dispersion to a broader spectrum of shareholders;
3)     disclosing improved quarterly information, including consolidated figures and special audit revisions on a quarterly basis;
4)     complying with the enhanced disclosure rules of the exchange for transactions involving assets, including transactions with our controlling shareholders and our management;
5)     disclosing shareholder agreements and stock option programs; and
6)     the publication of an annual calendar of corporate events.

1) the maintenance of a free-float of at least 25.0% of our capital stock;

2) holding of public offerings for share placements through mechanisms that favor capital dispersion to a broader spectrum of shareholders;

3) disclosing improved quarterly information, including consolidated figures and special audit revisions on a quarterly basis;

4) complying with the enhanced disclosure rules of the exchange for transactions involving assets, including transactions with our controlling shareholders and our management;

5) disclosing shareholder agreements and stock option programs; and

6) the publication of an annual calendar of corporate events.

Regulation of Brazilian Securities Markets

     The Brazilian securities markets are regulated by the CVM, which has authority over stock exchanges and the securities markets generally, and by the Brazilian Central Bank, which has, among other powers, licensing authority over brokerage firms and regulates foreign investment and foreign exchange transactions. The Brazilian securities market is governed by Law 6,385 as amended (the "Brazilian Securities Law") and the Brazilian Corporation Law.

     Under the Brazilian Corporation Law, a company is either publicly held, acompanhia aberta, such as our companywe are, (whose shares are publicly traded on the São Paulo Stock Exchange) or privately held, acompanhia fechada. All publicly held companies are registered with the CVM and are subject to reporting requirements. A company that is registered with the CVM may have its securities traded either on the Brazilian stock exchanges or on the Brazilian over-the-counter market. The shares of a public company may also be traded privately, subject to certain limitations. To be listed on the Brazilian stock exchanges, a company must apply for registration with the CVM and the stock exchange where the head office of the company is located. Once this stock exchange has admitted a company to listing and the CVM has accepted its registration as a publicly held company, its securities may be traded on the São Paulo Stock Exchange.

     Trading in securities on the São Paulo Stock Exchange may be suspended at the request of a company in anticipation of a material announcement. Trading may also be suspended on the initiative of the São Paulo Stock Exchange or the CVM, among other reasons, based on or due to a belief that the company has provided inadequate information regarding a material event or has provided inadequate responses to inquiries by the CVM or the relevant stock exchange.

122139


Table of Contents

     The Brazilian Securities Law provides for, among other things, disclosure requirements, restrictions on insider trading and price manipulation, and protection of minority shareholders. However, the Brazilian securities markets are not as highly regulated and supervised as the U.S. securities markets or markets in certain other jurisdictions.

ITEM 10. Additional InformationADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Memorandum and Articles of Association

     The summary of the material provisions concerning our Preferred Shares and Common Shares, our by-laws, and Brazilian Corporation Law contained in Item 10 "Additional“Item 10. Additional Information—Memorandum and Articles of Association" under Amendment.Amendment 1 to our Registration Statement on Form 20-F (File 1-15256), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on October 31, 2001, as amended (the "Registration Statement") is incorporated herein by reference. Such description contained in the Registration Statement is qualified to the extent applicable by this section, as well as by reference to our by-laws, which have been filed (together with an English translation) as an exhibit to this Annual Report, and to Brazilian Corporation Law. A copy of our by-laws (together with an English translation) is available for inspection at the principal office of the Depositary.

     Our Capital Stock is comprised of Preferred Shares and Common Shares, all without par value. At December 31, 2004,2005, there were 292,011,413,079305,701,231,289 Preferred Shares outstanding and 249,597,049,542 Common Shares outstanding.

Material Contracts

     The following summaries are not intended to be complete and reference is made to the agreements themselves, which are included as exhibits to this Form 20-F or other filings with the SEC as indicated below.

Our Concessions and Authorizations for Local and Intraregional Fixed-Line Switched Telecommunications servicesServices

     As successor in interest to each of Telesc, Telegoiás, Telebrasília, Telemat, Telems, Teleron, Teleacre, CTMR and CRT, we have assumed their public regime concessions to provide fixed-line local switched telecommunications services for calls originating in the following geographic areas: Paraná, Santa Catarina, Distrito Federal, Goiás, Tocantins, Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso do Sul, Rondônia, Acre and Rio Grande do Sul.

     Switched fixed-line local telecommunications services are services that, through the transmission of voice and other signals, allow for communications between fixed predetermined points within a local calling area.

The initial term of our respective concessions, which were originally granted free of charge, endsended on December 31, 2005. Notwithstanding the foregoing, we have the right to a one-time extension of twenty years for each concession provided that we meet certain conditions set forth in each such concession. We have requested and have been granted a twenty year extension of our concessions to provide fixed-line local switched telecommunications calls originating in the geographic areas listed above. On June 20, 2003, Anatel approved a new General Plan on Quality and the concession contract model under which all fixed-line telecommunications carriers will operate from January 1, 2006 onwards. On June 28, 2003, Decree 4769 was entered approving the General Plan on Universal Service. See "—Obligations of Telecommunications Companies—New Telecommunications Regulations." Every second year during the 20-year extension period, companies will be required to pay biannual fees equal to 2.0% of their annual net revenues from the provision of telecommunications services (excluding taxes and social contributions) during the immediately preceding year.

     On January 20, 2004 we were granted an open-end Authorization to provide fixed-line local telecommunications services in Regions I and III.

Our Concessions for Intraregional Fixed-Line Switched National Long-distance Telecommunications services

     As successor in interest to each of Telesc, Telegoiás, Telebrasília, Telemat, Telems, Teleron, Teleacre, CTMR and CRT, we have assumed their public regime concessions to provide fixed-line switched

123140


Table of Contents

telecommunications services for calls originating in the following geographic areas: Paraná, Santa Catarina, Distrito Federal, Goiás, Tocantins, Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso do Sul, Rondônia, Acre and Rio Grande do Sul.

     The terms of our respective concessions, which were originally granted free of charge, end on December 31, 2005. Notwithstanding the foregoing, we have the right to a one-time extension of twenty years for each concession, provided that we meet certain conditions set forth by each such concession. On June 20, 2003, Anatel approved a new General Plan on Quality and the concession contract model under which all fixed-line telecommunications carriers will operate from January 1, 2006 onwards. On June 28, 2003 Decree 4769 was entered approving the General Plan on Universal Service. See "—Obligations of Telecommunications Companies—New Telecommunications Regulations." Every second year during the 20-year extension period, companies will be required to pay biannual fees equal to 2.0% of their annual net revenues from the provision of telecommunications services (excluding taxes and social contributions) during the immediately preceding year.

Our Authorizations for Interregional Fixed-Line Switched National Long-distance Telecommunications services and International Fixed-Line Switched Long-distance Telecommunications services.

     On January 20, 2004 we were granted open-end Authorizationsauthorizations to (i) originate long-distance calls in Regions I and III and terminate such calls anywhere within the Brazilian territory, and (ii) originate long-distance international calls anywhere in Brazil.

Our Authorizations for Wireless Telecommunications Services (PCS)

     On December 18, 2002 we were granted three authorizations to render wireless services: (i) one authorization for the states of Santa Catarina eand Paraná; (ii) one authorization for the state of Rio Grande do Sul; and (iii) one authorization for the States of Acre, Goiás, Mato Grosso do Sul, Mato Grosso, Rondônia, Tocantis and Distrito Federal.

BNDES Loan Agreements

     On July 15, 2005, we received the third tranche from BNDES in the amount of R$252.0 million, from which R$213.7 million bears interest of TJLP plus 5.5% per annum and R$38.3 million bears interest of Cesta de Moedas plus 5.5% per annum. On November 8, 2005, we received the fourth and last tranche from BNDES in the amount of R$251.8 million, from which R$216.1 million bears interest of TJLP plus 5.5% per annum and R$35.7 million bears interest of Cesta de Moedas plus 5.5% per annum.

We have entered into loan agreements with the BNDES. BNDES, is our principal creditor. At December 31, 2004,2005, we had outstanding loans to BNDES in the aggregate principal amount of approximately R$2,288.12,316.5 million. The interest payable by our companyus on suchRealreal-denominated debt is based either on the TJLP rate +plus a spread (varying from 3.85% to 6.5% per annum, depending on the contract) or on the average annual currency basket rate published by BNDES (Cesta de Moeda) +plus a spread (varying from 3.85% to 6.5% per annum, depending on the contract). The TJLP rate in Brazil as of December 31, 20042005 was 9.75% per annum. The currency basket devalued 7.4%14.0% against BrazilianRealreal throughout 2004.2005.

     The proceeds from the BNDES loans have been used to finance the expansion and modernization of our network since June 1998, in order to meet the telecommunications service requirements established under our concession agreements.agreements

     On August 13, 2004, we entered into a new loan agreement with BNDES, in a total amount of R$1.27 billion, guaranteed by our holding company, Brasil Telecom Participações S.A. The loan bears interest (a) at the variable TJLP rate plus 5.5% per annum for 80% of the amount and (b) at the variableCesta de Moedas (a currency basket rate published by BNDES, representing basically the appreciation of the U.S.dollardollar versus the Brazilian real) plus 5.5% per annum for 20% of the amount. The loan has two different maturingmaturity dates (i) February 15, 2011 for the TJLP portion and (ii) April 15, 2011 for theCesta de Moedas portion. The proceeds have been used to finance our investment in wireline network plant and in operational improvements to meet the targets established in the General Plan on Universal Service (Plano Geral de Metas de Universalização – PGMU) and in the General Plan on Quality (Plano Geral de Metas de Qualidade – PGMQ), in the period of July 2003 to December 2005. On August 26, 2004, we received from BNDES the first tranche of this facility, in the amount of R$400.0 million, from which R$320.0 million bearbears interest of TJLP +plus 5.5% per annum and R$80.0 million bearbears interest ofCesta de Moedas + plus 5.5% per annum. On October 26, 2004, we received a second tranche from BNDES, in the amount of R$342.5 million, from which R$282.7 million bearbears interest of TJLP +plus 5.5% per annum and R$59.7 million bearbears interest ofCesta de Moedas + plus 5.5% per annum.

124


Table of Contents

Indenture

     WeOn February 17, 2004, we issued U.S.$US$200.0 million aggregate principal amount of 9.375% Notes due 2014 (the "2014 Notes") under an indenture, dated February 17, 2004, among Brasil Telecom, The Bank of New York, as indenture trustee, registrar, New York paying agent and transfer agent, and The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi Ltd., as principal paying agent. Pursuant to the indenture, the notes are payable in full in a single payment upon maturity

141


Table of Contents

unless redeemed earlier or extended pursuant to the terms of the indenture. The notes bear interest at a fixed rate of 9.375% per annum from the date of issuance until all required amounts due in respect thereof have been paid. Interest on the notes is paid semiannually in arrears on February 17 and August 17 of each year, commencing on August 17, 2004, to the noteholders registered as such as of the close of business on a record date being the tenth business day preceding such payment date. Interest for the first interest period accrued from February 17, 2004. Interest on the notes is computed on the basis of a 360-day year of twelve 30-day months.

     The indenture describes covenants with which we must comply, including:

  • observations of certain interest coverage and leverage ratios when incurring additional indebtedness;
  • restrictions with respect to certain mergers, consolidations or similar transactions;
  • restrictions with respect to creation of certain liens on our assets; and
  • restrictions with respect to certain sale and lease-back transactions.

     These covenants are subject to a number of important qualifications and exceptions as described in the indenture.

     The indenture will contain certain events of default, consisting of, among others, the following:

  • failure to pay principal when due;
  • failure to pay interest and other amounts (i) within 30 calendar days of the due date therefor in the case of payments made in respect of any interest payment dates occurring prior to the expected maturity date, and (ii) when due, in the case of any interest payment date occurring on or after the expected maturity date; and
  • breach by us of any covenant or agreement in the indenture or any of the other relevant transaction documents.

Registration of NotesInsurance Trust Agreement

     On October 28, 2004, a Registration Statement under the Securities Act of 1933In connection with respect to our issuance of U.S.$200,000,000 9.375%the 2014 Notes, due 2014 was declared effective bywe entered into an insurance trust agreement dated February 17, 2004, between The Bank of New York, as insurance trustee and us. The insurance trust agreement establishes a grantor trust (the "Insurance Trust") under New York law for the Securitiesbenefit of the noteholders. Pursuant to an insurance trust agreement the Insurance Trustee will hold the insurance as credit enhancement and Exchange Commission. The exchange offer expired on December 14, 2004. All unregisteredsupport for the notes were exchanged for new registered notes.to the extent of the coverage set forth in the insurance policy.

Company Support Agreement

     In connection with our issuance of U.S.$200.0 million of the 2014 Notes we entered into a company support agreement with the Overseas Private Investment Corporation ("OPIC") dated February 17, 2004. Under the company support agreement we agree to, among other things, make certain representations and warranties and covenants with respect to our compliance with environmental, workers' rights, foreign corrupt practices and other matters. A breach by us of any of our representations and warranties or covenants in the company support agreement which results in an Event of Termination (as defined therein) would entitle OPIC to terminate the insurance policy relating to the 2014 Notes or to withhold any amount otherwise payable by OPIC under such insurance policy. If the insurance policy is terminated or otherwise ceases to be in full force and effect, or OPIC

125


Table of Contents

withholds any amount otherwise payable by OPIC under the insurance policy, in each case for any reason attributable to acts or omissions of Brasil Telecom, an event of default under the indenture for the 2014 Notes will occur.

Insurance Trust Agreement142


     In connection with our issuanceTable of the 2014 Notes, we entered into an insurance trust agreement dated February 17, 2004, between The Bank of New York, as insurance trustee and us. The insurance trust agreement establishes a grantor trust (the "Insurance Trust") under New York law for the benefit of the noteholders. Pursuant to an insurance trust agreement the Insurance Trustee will hold the insurance as credit enhancement and support for the notes to the extent of the coverage set forth in the insurance policy.

Contents

JBIC-Guaranteed Loan

     On March 24, 2004 we entered into a Japanese Yen 21.6 billion loan facility arranged by SMBC, guaranteed by JBIC and granted by a syndicate of five commercial banks (including SMBC). The loan is not secured and bears interest at a rate equal to LIBOR Yen plus 1.92% per annum. Interest payments are due on September 24 and March 24 of each year. We borrowed the entire amount available under this facility on April 28, 2004 in the form of a single term loan, which was exchanged into approximately R$576.0 million and which we used to partially bear our 2003 capital expenditures.

     Overdue amounts bear interest at a rate equal to LIBOR Yen plus 1.92% per annum. The interest payments and arrangement fee and agency fee on this loan are subject to withholding in Brazil at a rate of 12.5%, and we are required to gross-up such interest payments to ensure the lenders receive the amounts they would have received in the absence of this withholding. The principal amount of this loan is repayable in Japanese Yen in ten equal installments due on the interest payment dates referred to above. We may prepay all or a portion of this loan on any payment date subject to certain conditions.

     JBIC, pursuant to its untied guarantee program, has guaranteed the repayment of 97.5% of the principal amount of and interest due on this loan. For this guarantee JBIC receives a fee in the amount of 1.251.25% per annum of 97.5% of the aggregate principal amount of the loan outstanding from time to time. In order to induce JBIC to guarantee the Japanese Yen 21.6 billion loan facility, on March 18, 2004 we entered into a loan facility in Yen in an aggregate amount of approximately R$3.0 million with JBIC and the participating financial institutions. The proceeds from such loan were used for the acquisition of Japanese goods.

     The loan agreements impose certain restrictions on us, including limitations on liens (subject to customary exceptions), limitations on assets sales and limitations on mergers and similar transactions. Under the loan agreements we are also subject to financial covenants including an interest coverage ratio, debt coverage ratio and leverage ratio. If we fail to comply with these financial covenants, in addition to the other remedies available to the lenders, we may be required to provide to the lenders and JBIC collateral security for the loan, including a guarantee from a bank or parent company. The loan agreements include customary events of default, subject to certain grace periods and customary exceptions.

Debentures – "Escritura Pública de Emissão"

     At a meeting of our Board of Directors on June 5, 2006, the Board unanimously approved the 5th Issuance, being the 4th Public Issuance (the “Issuance”), of simple, nominative, non-convertible debentures (the “Debentures”). This was the first issuance made in the context of our first Securities Distribution Program, in a total aggregate amount of R$1.08 billion. The Debentures were issued on June 1, 2006, are guaranteed by our holding company, Brasil Telecom Participações S.A., and have a term of seven years from the issuance date, maturing on June 1, 2013. The unit face value of each Debenture shall be amortized in accordance with the following schedule: (i) R$3,330.00 (33.3%) on June 1st, 2011; (ii) R$3,330.00 (33.3%) on June 1, 2012; and (iii) R$3,340.00 (33.4%) on June 1, 2013. The remuneration of the Debentures shall be established by our senior management, which shall ratify the bookbuilding process, subject to a maximum rate of 104.3% of the IDC (Interbank Deposit Certificate).

On July 5, 2004, we issued R$500.0 million aggregate principal amount of public non-convertible debentures program guaranteed by our holding company, Brasil Telecom Participações S.A. The debentures will mature on July 5, 2009. Interest on the debentures is equivalent to the CDI rate +plus 1.0% per annum and is payable on a semi-annual basis, on January 5 and July 5 of each year, until the maturity of the debentures. Under theEscritura Pública de Emissão we are also subject to financial covenants, including an interest coverage ratio, debt coverage ratio and leverage ratio. Failure to comply with these financial covenants may trigger an event of default. Moreover, theEscritura Pública de Emissão includes other customary events of default, subject to certain grace periods and customary exceptions.

126


Table of Contents

Exchange Controls

     There are no restrictions on ownership of the ADSs or the Preferred Shares by individuals or legal entities domiciled outside Brazil.

     The right to convert dividend payments and proceeds from the sale of shares into foreign currency and to remit such amounts outside Brazil may be subject to restrictions under foreign investment legislation which generally requires, among other things, that the relevant investments be registered with the Brazilian Central Bank. If any restrictions are imposed on the remittance of foreign capital abroad, they could hinder or preventBanco Bradesco S.A., as custodian for our Preferred Shares represented by the ADSs, or registered holders who have exchanged ADSs for Preferred Shares, from converting dividends, distributions or the proceeds from any sale of such Preferred Shares, as the case may be, into U.S. dollars and remitting the U.S. dollars abroad.

143


Table of Contents

     Foreign investors may register their investment under Law 4,131/62 or Resolution 2,689. Registration under Resolution 2,689 affords favorable tax treatment to foreign investors who are not resident in a tax haven, as defined by Brazilian tax laws. See "—Taxation—Brazilian Tax Considerations."

     Under Resolution 2,689, foreign investors may invest in almost all financial assets and engage in almost all transactions available in the Brazilian financial and capital markets, provided that certain requirements are fulfilled. In accordance with Resolution 2,689, the definition of foreign investor includes individuals, legal entities, mutual funds and other collective investment entities, domiciled or headquartered abroad.

     Under Resolution 2,689, a foreign investor must:

  • appoint at least one representative in Brazil, with powers to perform actions relating to its investment;
  • appoint an authorized custodian in Brazil for its investments;
  • register as a foreign investor with the CVM; and
  • register its foreign investment with Brazilian Central Bank.

     Under Resolution 2,689, securities and other financial assets held by a foreign investor must be registered or maintained in deposit accounts or under the custody of an entity duly licensed by the Brazilian Central Bank or the CVM. In addition, any transfer of securities held under Resolution 2,689 must be carried out in the stock exchanges or through organized over-the-counter markets licensed by the CVM, except for transfers resulting from a corporate reorganization, or occurring upon the death of an investor by operation of law or will or as a consequence of the de-listing of the relevant shares from a Brazilian stock exchange and the cancellation of the registration of the relevant company from the CVM.

     Holders of ADSs who have not registered their investment with the Brazilian Central Bank could be adversely affected by delays in, or refusals to grant, any required government approval for conversions of payments made inreais and remittances abroad of these converted amounts.

     Resolution 1,927 of the National Monetary Council, which restated and amended Annex V to Resolution 1,289, provides for the issuance of depositary receipts in foreign markets in respect of shares of Brazilian issuers. We have obtained approval for the American Depositary Shares under Annex V to Resolution.Resolution 1,289, in order to (i) allow the proceeds from the sale by holders of ADSs outside Brazil to be free of Brazilian foreign investment controls, and (ii) allow holders of ADSs who are not resident in a tax haven to be entitled to favorable tax treatment in Brazil. See "—Taxation—Brazilian Tax Considerations."

     A certificate of foreign capital registration has been issued in the name of the Depositary with respect to the ADSs and is maintained byBanco Bradesco S.A., as custodian for our Preferred Shares represented by the ADSs, on behalf of the Depositary. Pursuant to such certificate of foreign capital registration, we expect that the Depositary will be able to convert dividends and other distributions with respect to the Preferred Shares represented by ADSs

127


Table of Contents

into foreign currency and remit the proceeds outside of Brazil. See Item 9 "Offer“Item 9. Offer and listing—Offer and listing details" and Item 9 "Offer“Item 9. Offer and Listing—Markets—Trading on the São Paulo Stock Exchange."

     In the event that a holder of ADSs exchanges the ADSs for Preferred Shares, such holder will be entitled to continue to rely on the Depositary's certificate of foreign capital registration for only five business days after such exchange, following which such holder must seek to obtain its own certificate of foreign capital registration with the Brazilian Central Bank. Thereafter, any holder of Preferred Shares may not be able to convert into foreign currency and remit outside Brazil the proceeds from the disposition of, or distributions with respect to, such Preferred Shares, unless such holder qualifies under Resolution 2,689 or obtains its own certificate of foreign capital registration. A holder of Preferred Shares that obtains a certificate of foreign capital registration will be subject to less favorable Brazilian tax treatment than a holder of ADSs. See "—Taxation—Brazilian Tax Considerations."

144


Table of Contents

Taxation

     The following summary contains a description of the principal Brazilian and U.S. federal income tax considerations of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of Preferred Shares or ADSs, but it does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all the tax considerations that may be relevant to a decision to purchase Preferred Shares or ADSs. The summary is based upon the tax laws of Brazil and regulations thereunder and on the tax laws of the U.S. and regulations thereunder as in effect on the date hereof, all of which authorities are subject to change or differing interpretations, possibly with retroactive effect. Each holder should consult their own tax advisors as to the tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of Preferred Shares or ADSs.

     Although there is at present no income tax treaty in force between Brazil and the U.S., the tax authorities of the two countries have had discussions that may culminate in such a treaty. No assurance can be given, however, as to whether or when a treaty will enter into force or how it will affect the U.S. holders of Preferred Shares or ADSs. Prospective holders of Preferred Shares or ADSs should consult their own tax advisors as to the tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of Preferred Shares or ADSs in their particular circumstances.

Brazilian Tax Considerations

     The following discussion summarizes the principal Brazilian tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of Preferred Shares or ADSs by a holder not deemed to be domiciled in Brazil for Brazilian tax purposes (a "non-Brazilian holder"). This discussion does not address all the Brazilian tax considerations that may be applicable to any particular non-Brazilian holder, and each non-Brazilian holder should consult his or her own tax advisor about the Brazilian tax consequences of investing in Preferred Shares or ADSs.

     Individuals domiciled in Brazil and Brazilian companies are taxed in Brazil on the basis of their worldwide income which includes earnings of Brazilian companies' foreign subsidiaries, branches and affiliates. The earnings of branches of foreign companies and non-Brazilian residents ("nonresidents") in general are taxed in Brazil only on income derived from Brazilian sources.

Taxation of Dividends

     Dividends paid by our companyus in cash or in kind from profits of periods beginning on or after January 1, 1996 (i) to the Depositary in respect of Preferred Shares underlying ADSs or (ii) to a non-Brazilian holder in respect of Preferred Shares will not be subject to Brazilian withholding tax. Dividends paid from profits generated before January 1, 1996 may be subject to Brazilian withholding tax at varying rates, except that stock dividends are not subject to Brazilian tax unless we subsequently redeem the stock, or the non-Brazilian holder sells the stock in Brazil, within five years after the correspondent capital increase.

     The only Brazilian tax treaty now in effect that would (if certain conditions are met) reduce the rate of the withholding tax on dividends paid from profits generated before January 1, 1996 is the treaty with Japan, which would reduce the rate to 12.5% under the circumstances set forth in the treaty.

128


Table of Contents

Taxation of Gains

     Brazilian law distinguishes between, on the one hand, direct foreign investments in Brazilian companies and, on the other hand, foreign investments in securities issued by Brazilian companies through the Brazilian capital markets. Under Resolution 2,689, which became effective on March 31, 2000, superseding previous regulations (Annex IV) which restrict such foreign investment portfolios to institutional investors, foreign investors may invest directly in Brazilian financial markets, as long as they meet certain requirements. See "—Exchange Controls" above.

     Until recently, gains realized outside Brazil by a non-Brazilian holder on the disposition of ADSs to another non-Brazilian holder were not subject to Brazilian tax. However, Law 10,833, published on December 29, 2003, established that the disposition of assets located in Brazil by nonresidents, whether to other nonresidents or Brazilian residents and whether made within or outside Brazil, is subject to taxation in Brazil at a rate of 15.0%, or 25.0%, if the Nonresident is domiciled in a country that does not tax income or that taxes it at a maximum rate of 20.0% .

145


Table of Contents

     As a result, the disposition of ADSs, the deposit of Preferred Shares in exchange for ADSs or the withdrawal of Preferred Shares upon cancellation of ADSs may be characterized as assets located in Brazil and could be subject to the income tax according to Law 10,833/03, if there is gain in the transaction, at a 15.0% rate or 25.0% rate, if the beneficiary of the gain is domiciled in a country that does not tax income or that taxes it at a maximum rate of 20.0% .

     Gains realized by non-Brazilian holders on dispositions of Preferred Shares in Brazil or in transactions with Brazilian residents, if they observe the requirements of Resolution 2,689, are exempted from withholding income tax, unless the foreign investor is located in a jurisdiction which does not impose income tax or which has an income tax rate lower than 20.0%, in which case it will be subject to the same general taxation rules applicable to Brazilian residents.

     Gains on the disposition of Preferred Shares obtained upon cancellation of ADSs are not taxed in Brazil if such disposition is made, and the proceeds are remitted abroad, within five business days after cancellation.

     Any gains realized by a non-Brazilian resident upon the redemption of Preferred Shares will be treated as gains from the disposition of such Preferred Shares to a Brazilian resident occurring off of a stock exchange and will accordingly be subject to tax at a rate of 20.0%15.0%, except for gains realized by a non-Brazilian resident located in a jurisdiction which does not impose income taxes or which has an income tax rate lower than 20.0%, in which case such gain will be subject to tax at a rate of 25.0% .

     Gain is measured by the difference between the amount in Brazilian currency realized on the sale or exchange and the acquisition cost of the shares sold, measured in Brazilian currency without any correction for inflation; the acquisition cost of shares registered as an investment with the Brazilian Central Bank is calculated on the basis of the foreign currency amount registered with the Brazilian Central Bank.

     There can be no assurance that the current preferential treatment for holders of ADSs and non-Brazilian holders of Preferred Shares will be maintained.

     Any exercise of preemptive rights relating to our Preferred Shares or ADSs will not be subject to Brazilian taxation. Gains on the sale or assignment of preemptive rights relating to our Preferred Shares will be treated differently for Brazilian tax purposes depending on (i) whether the sale or assignment is made by the Depositary or by you, and (ii) whether the transaction takes place on a Brazilian stock exchange. Gains on sales or assignments made by the Depositary on a Brazilian stock exchange are not taxed in Brazil, but gains on other sales or assignments may be subject to tax at rates up to 20.0% .

129


Table of Contents

Distributions of Interest on Capital

     Brazilian corporations may make payments to shareholders characterized as interest on our capital as an alternative form of making dividend distributions. The rate of interest may not be higher than the TJLP rate as determined by the Brazilian Central Bank from time to time (11.0% per annum for the three month period beginning October 1, 2003). The total amount distributed as interest on capital may not exceed the greater of (i) 50.0% of net income (before taking such distribution and any deductions for income taxes into account) for the year in respect of which the payment is made or (ii) 50.0% of retained earnings for the year prior to the year in respect of which the payment is made. Payments of interest on capital are decided by the shareholders on the basis of recommendations of our board of directors.

     We may deduct distributions of interest on capital paid to Brazilian and non-Brazilian holders of Preferred Shares, including payments to the Depositary in respect of Preferred Shares underlying ADSs, for Brazilian corporate income tax purposes. Such payments are subject to Brazilian withholding tax at the rate of 15.0%, except for payments to persons who are exempt from tax in Brazil, which are free of Brazilian tax, and except for payments to persons situated in jurisdictions deemed to be tax havens (i.e., countries that either have no income tax or in which the income tax rate is less than 20.0%), which will be subject to tax at a 25.0% rate.

146


Table of Contents

     No assurance can be given that our board of directors will not recommend that future distributions of profits should be made by means of interest on capital instead of by means of dividends.

     Amounts paid as interest on capital (net of applicable withholding tax) may be treated as payments in respect of the dividends that we are obligated to distribute to our shareholders in accordance with our By-laws and the Brazilian Corporation Law. Distributions of interest on capital in respect of our Preferred Shares, including distributions to the Depositary in respect of Preferred Shares underlying ADSs, may be converted into U.S. dollars and remitted outside of Brazil, subject to applicable exchange controls.

Other Brazilian Taxes

     There are no Brazilian inheritance, gift or succession taxes applicable to the ownership, transfer or disposition of Preferred Shares or ADSs by a non-Brazilian holder except for gift and inheritance taxes levied by some states in Brazil on gifts made or inheritances bestowed by individuals or entities not resident or domiciled in Brazil or in the relevant State to individuals or entities that are resident or domiciled within such State in Brazil. There are no Brazilian stamp, issue, registration, or similar taxes or duties payable by holders of Preferred Shares or ADSs.

     A financial transactionThe Tax on Financial Transactions (Imposto Sobre Operações Financeiras, known as the “IOF”), is a tax (the "IOF tax")on foreign exchange, securities, credit and insurance transactions. The IOF rate may be imposedchanged by an Executive Decree (rather than a law). In addition, the IOF rate is not subject to the ex-post-facto principle, which provides that laws increasing the rate of or creating new taxes will only come into effect as of the latter of (i) the first day of the year following their publication, or (ii) ninety days after their publication. A statute increasing the IOF rate will therefore take effect from its publication date.

     With regard to foreign exchange transactions, in spite of the maximum permitted IOF rate being 25% , the remittance or receipt of amounts are presently subject to a 0% tax rate. The only exceptions apply to foreign exchange transactions in connection with loans with a minimum average term not exceeding 90 days, which are subject to the IOF at a 5% rate, as well as foreign exchange transactions for the acquisition of goods or services outside Brazil with credit cards, in which case the rate is 2% of the amount of the transaction.

     The IOF tax may be also levied on the conversionissuances of bonds or securities, including transactions carried out on Brazilian currency into foreign currency (e.g., for purposes of paying dividends and interest).stock, futures or commodities exchanges. The rate of the IOF tax on such conversionswith respect to many securities transactions is currently 0%, but the Minister0 percent, although certain transactions may be subject to specific rates. The minister of Financefinance, however, has the legal powerauthority to increase the rate to a maximum of 25.0% . Any1.5% per day of the amount of the taxed transaction, during the period the investor holds the securities, up to the amount equal to the gain made on the transaction and only from the date of its increase or creation.

     IOF is also assessed on transactions with terms of less than 30 days consisting of the sale, assignment, repurchase or renewal of fixed-income investments or the redemption of shares of investment funds or investment pools. The maximum rate of IOF payable in such increasecases is 1% per day, up to the amount equal to the gain made on the transaction, and decreases with the length of the transaction, reaching zero for transactions with maturities of at least 30 days, except that the rate for the following types of transactions is currently 0%:

  • transactions carried out by financial institutions and other institutions chartered by the Central Bank as principals;
  • transactions carried out by mutual funds or investment pools themselves;
  • transactions carried out in the equity markets, including those performed in stock, futures and commodities exchanges and similar entities;
  • redemptions of shares in equity funds; and
  • transactions carried out by governmental entities, political parties and worker’s syndicates.

147


Table of Contents

     The IOF tax is levied on insurance transactions at a rate of: (i) zero, in the operations of reinsurance or relating to export credits, the international transport of goods or when the premiums are allocated to the financing of life insurance plans with coverage for survival, among others; (ii) 2% of premiums paid in the case of (a) health insurance and (b) life insurance related to personal and labor accidents (this rate will be applicable only prospectively.reduced to zero as of September 1, 2006) and (iii) 7% of premiums paid in the case of other types of insurance. Rural insurance is exempt from IOF tax.

     In addition to the IOF tax, a second, temporary tax that applies to the removal of funds from accounts at banks and other financial institutions (the "CPMF tax") will be imposed on our distributions in respect of ADSs at the time such distributions are converted into U.S. dollars and remitted abroad byBanco Bradesco S.A., as custodian for our Preferred Shares represented by the ADSs. Currently, the CPMF tax rate is 0.38% .

FUST – Universal Telecommunications Service Fund

     The Universal Telecommunications Service Fund, introduced by Law 9,998/00,Oficio Circular 58/04, andDespacho 29/03 (Anatel), was created to raise funds to meet the cost of the universalization of the telecommunications services, which are not recoverable through the efficient exploration of the service. According to the law, one of FUST's forms of income is the contribution by both public and private telecommunications providers, of 1.0% of the gross operating revenue from the rendering of telecommunications services. The value willservices after certain deductions.

     In 2003, Anatel rendered a decision in which they determined that FUST should be calculated after certain tax deductions and will excludebased on our net revenues, excluding interconnection costs. The funds are supposedOn December 15, 2005, Anatel reversed its earlier determination, and accordingly, the basis of the FUST calculation is net revenues including amounts paid as interconnection costs. According to be paidCVM’s rules, however, it is not possible for a Brazilian corporation to Anatelbook tax credits under discussion as “assets” and will be invested according toaccordingly, we expensed such amounts in our financial statements for the policies laid out by the Ministry of Communication.period ended December 31, 2005.

130


Table of Contents

FUNTTEL –Fund for the Technological Development of the Telecommunications

     Law 10,052/00 established the Fund for the Technological Development of Telecommunications. Pursuant to this regulation, the fund was created to foster technological development, encourage human intellectual capital, encourage employment, promote capital access to small and medium sized business, all in order to enlarge the competitiveness of the Brazilian Telecommunications' Industry. This fund received a contribution of 0.5% of the gross operating income, after tax deduction, earned through the exploration of telecommunications services by both public and private companies. A directive board composed of governmental representatives will manage the fund and determine how the funds will be invested.

FISTEL – Fund for Control of the Telecommunication

     The Fund for Control of the Telecommunication, introduced by Law No. 5,070/66, was created to raise funds to meet the cost of the telecommunication’s control and development of new mechanisms and techniques for the practice of such control. There are two taxes composing FISTEL: (i) Installation Control Tax, which is due when the functioning of stations license is issued and fixed by Anatel; (ii) Functioning Control Tax, which is annually due, corresponding to 50% of the Installation Control Tax.

Registered Capital

     Amounts invested in Preferred Shares by a non-Brazilian holder who qualifies under the Resolution 2,689 and obtains registration with the CVM, or by the Depositary representing an ADS holder, are eligible for registration with the Brazilian Central Bank. Such registration (the amount so registered is referred to as "Registered Capital") allows the remittance outside Brazil of foreign currency, converted at the Commercial Market Rate, acquired with the proceeds of distributions on, and amounts realized through dispositions of such Preferred Shares. The Registered Capital per Preferred Share purchased in the form of an ADS, or purchased in Brazil and deposited with the Depositary in exchange for an ADS, will be equal to its purchase price (stated in U.S. dollars). The Registered

148


Table of Contents

Capital per Preferred Share withdrawn upon cancellation of an ADS will be the U.S. dollar equivalent of (i) the average price of a Preferred Share on the Brazilian stock exchange on which the most Preferred Shares were traded on the day of withdrawal or, (ii) if no Preferred Shares were traded on that day, the average price on the Brazilian stock exchange on which the most Preferred Shares were traded in the fifteen trading sessions immediately preceding such withdrawal. The U.S. dollar equivalent will be determined on the basis of the average Commercial Market rates quoted by the Brazilian Central Bank on such date or dates.

     A non-Brazilian holder of Preferred Shares may experience delays in effecting Brazilian Central Bank registration, which may delay remittances abroad. Such a delay may adversely affect the amount in U.S. dollars, received by the non-Brazilian holder.

U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations

     The statements regarding U.S. federal income tax law set forth below are based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), its legislative history, existing and proposed Treasury regulations thereunder, published rulings and court decisions, as in force on the date of this Annual Report, and changes to such law subsequent to the date of this Annual Report may affect the tax consequences described herein, possibly with retroactive effect. This summary describes the principal tax consequences of the ownership and disposition of Preferred Shares or ADSs, but it does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all of the federal income tax consequences that may be relevant to a decision to own or dispose of Preferred Shares or ADSs. This summary applies only to purchasers of Preferred Shares or ADSs who will hold the Preferred Shares or ADSs as "capital assets" within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code (i.e., generally, property held for investment) and does not apply to special classes of holders such as dealers or brokers in securities or currencies, holders whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar, holders of 10.0%10% or more of our shares (by vote or by value, and directly or by attribution, taking into account shares held directly through depositary arrangements)attribution), tax-exempt organizations, financial institutions, insurance companies, regulated investment companies, holders liable for the alternative minimum tax, securities tradersholders who elect to account for their investment in Preferred Shares or ADSs on a mark-to-market basis, and persons holding Preferred Shares or ADSs in a hedging transaction or as part of a straddle, conversion or constructive ownership transaction.

     Each holder should consult such holder's own tax advisor concerning the overall tax consequences to it, including the consequences under tax laws other than U.S. federal income tax laws, of an investment in the Preferred Shares or ADSs.

     As used in this summary, references to "ADSs" also refer to "Preferred Shares." As used in this summary, the term "U.S. holder" means a beneficial owner of ADSs that is for U.S. federal income tax purposes, (i) a citizen or resident of the United States, (ii) a corporation or other entity (treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax

131


Table of Contents

purposes) organized in or under the laws of the United States or its political subdivisions, (iii) a trust subject to the control of a U.S. person (as defined in the Code) and the primary supervision of a U.S. court or which validly elects to be treated as a U.S. person for U.S. federal income tax purposes, or (iv) an estate, the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source. As used in this summary, the term "non-U.S. holder" means a beneficial owner of ADSs that is not a U.S. holder. InAdditionally, this opinion does not consider the casetax treatment of partnerships or persons who hold ADSs through a partnership or other pass-through entity or the possible application of U.S. federal gift or estate taxes. Material aspects of U.S. federal income tax relevant to a holder other than a U.S. holder are also described below.

Taxation of the common shares that is, or is treated as, a partnershipDistributions

     A U.S. holder will recognize ordinary dividend income for U.S. federal income tax purposes the tax treatment of a partner will generally depend upon the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. Therefore, partners of a partnership holding our common shares should consult their tax advisor.

     For purposes ofin accordance with the U.S. federal income tax laws, holdersholder's regular method of ADSs will be treated as owners of the ADSs represented by such ADSs.

Taxation of Dividends

     Subject to the "Passive Foreign Investment Company" discussion below, a U.S. holder will recognize ordinary dividend incomeaccounting for U.S. federal income tax purposes in an amount equal to the amount of any cash and the value of any property that we distribute, as a dividend, to the extent that such distribution is paid out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits ("e&p"E&P"), as determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes,purposes. Certain dividend income may be eligible for a reduced rate of taxation. Dividend income is taxed at the applicable long-term capital gains rate if the dividend is received by a non-corporate U.S. holder from a “qualified foreign corporation” and certain conditions are met. A U.S. holder will be eligible for this reduced rate only if certain conditions are met. A foreign corporation will be a qualified foreign corporation with respect to any dividend paid on stock that is readily tradable on an established U.S. securities market. Our ADSs are listed on the New York

149


Table of Contents

Stock Exchange and, therefore, the ADSs will qualify as readily tradeable on an established securities market in accordancethe United States so long as they are listed. However, no assurances can be given that the ADSs will remain readily tradeable. Moreover, a foreign corporation will not be treated as a qualified foreign corporation if it is a Passive Foreign Investment Company (see discussion below) for the year in which the dividend was paid or the preceding year.

     Based on existing guidance, it is not entirely clear whether dividends received with respect to the Preferred Shares will be treated as qualified dividends that are eligible for a reduced rate of taxation because the Preferred Shares are not themselves listed on a United States exchange. In addition, the United States Treasury Department has announced its intention to promulgate rules pursuant to which holders of ADSs or Preferred Shares and intermediaries through whom such securities are held will be permitted to rely on certifications from issuers to establish that dividends are treated as qualified dividends. Because such procedures have not yet been issued, we are not certain that we will be able to comply with them. U.S. holder's regular methodholders of accounting for U.S. federal incomeADSs and Preferred Shares should consult their own tax purposes.advisers regarding the availability of the reduced dividend tax rate in the light of their own particular circumstances.

     To the extent that such a distribution exceeds our e&p,E&P, it will be treated as a nontaxable return of capital, to the extent of the U.S. holder's tax basis in the ADS (or Preferred Shares, as the case may be), and thereafter as capital gain. The amount of any dividend distribution will include the amount of Brazilian tax withheld on the amount distributed and the amount of a distribution paid inreais will be measuredincludible in the income of a U.S. holder in a U.S. dollar amount calculated by reference to the exchange rate for convertingreais into U.S. dollars in effect on the dateday the distribution is received byBanco Bradesco S.A., as custodian for our Preferred Shares represented byreceived. If the ADSs, or by a U.S. holder in the case of a holder of Preferred Shares. If(or the custodian or U.S. holder, in the case of a holder of Preferred Shares,its shares) does not convert suchreais into U.S. dollars on the date it receives them, it is possible that the U.S. holder will recognize foreign currency loss or gain, which would generally be U.S. source ordinary loss or gain, when thereais are converted into U.S. dollars. Dividends that we have paid will generally not be eligible for the dividends received deduction allowed to corporations under the Code.

     Distributions out of e&pE&P with respect to the ADSs generally will be treated as dividend income from sources outside of the U.S. and under the foreign tax credit rules, for dividends paid before January 1, 2007, will, with certain exceptions, generally be "passive" income. Dividends paid in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2006 will, depending on your circumstances, be “passive” or “general” income which, in either case, is treated separately along withfrom other itemstypes of "passive" (or, in the case of certain U.S. holders, "financial services") income for purposes of determiningcomputing the credit for foreign income taxes allowed under the Code.tax credit. Subject to certain significant and complex limitations, Brazilian income tax withheld in connection with any distribution with respect to the ADSs may be claimed as a credit against the U.S. federal income tax liability of a U.S. holder if such U.S. holder elects for that year to credit all foreign income taxes. Such Brazilian withholding tax may be taken as a deduction at the U.S. Holder'sholder's election, only if the U.S. Holderholder does not claim a credit for any Brazilian or other foreign taxes paid or accrued in that year. Foreign tax credits will not be allowed for withholding taxes imposed in respect of certain short-term or hedged positions in securities or in respect of arrangements in which a U.S. holder's expected economic profit, after non-U.S. taxes, is insubstantial. U.S. holders should consult their own tax advisors concerning the implications of these rules in light of their particular circumstances.

     Distributions of additional shares to holders with respect to their ADSs that are made as part of a pro rata distribution to all of our shareholders generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax.

     A non-U.S. holder generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax or withholding tax on distributions with respect to ADSs that are treated as dividend income for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax or withholding tax on distributions with respect to ADSs that are treated as capital gain for U.S. federal income tax purposes unless such non-U.S. holder would be subject to U.S. federal income tax on gain realized on the sale or other disposition of ADSs, as discussed below.below in the “Taxation of Capital Gains” section.

Taxation of Capital Gains

     Subject to the "Passivedescription of the Passive Foreign Investment Company" discussionCompany rules discussed below, in general, upon the sale, exchange or other taxable disposition of an ADS, a U.S. holder will recognize capital gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes in an amount equal to the difference between the amount realized in consideration for the disposition of the ADS (excluding the amount of any distribution paid to the custodian but not distributed by the custodian prior to the

132


Table of Contents

disposition) and the U.S. holder's tax basis in the ADS. Such gain or loss generally will be subject to U.S. federal income taxADSs, which is usually the cost of these shares, and will be treated as capital gain or loss if the shares were held as a capital asset and will be long-term capital gain or loss if the shares have been held for more than one yearamount realized on the date of suchdisposition. Capital gain from the sale, or disposition. Under U.S. legislation enacted in 2003, long-term capital gains realized upon a saleexchange or other disposition of ADSs after May 5, 2003held more than one year is long-term capital gain and before the end ofis eligible for a taxable year which begins before January 1, 2009 are generally subject to a maximum federal income taxreduced rate of 15%. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to certain limitations. Gain or losstaxation for non-corporate U.S. holders. In general, gain realized by a U.S. holder on a sale, exchange or other disposition of ADSs generally will be treated as U.S. source income for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes. A loss realized by a U.S. holder on the sale, exchange or other disposition of ADSs is generally allocated to U.S. source income. However, regulations require the loss to be allocated to foreign source income to the extent certain dividends were received by the taxpayer within the 24-month

150


Table of Contents

period preceding the date on which the taxpayer recognized the loss. The deductibility of a loss realized on the sale, exchange or other disposition of ADSs is subject to limitations for both corporate and individual U.S. holders.

     A U.S. holder that uses the cash method of accounting calculates the U.S. dollar value of the proceeds received from a sale of ADSs as of the date that the sale settles, and will generally have no additional foreign currency gain or loss on the sale, while a U.S. holder that uses the accrual method of accounting is required to calculate the value of the proceeds of the sale as of the trade date and may therefore realize foreign currency gain or loss, unless the U.S. holder has elected to use the settlement date to determine its proceeds of sale for purposes of calculating this foreign currency gain or loss. Consequently, if Brazilian tax is imposedIn addition, a U.S. holder that receives foreign currency upon disposition of the ADSs and converts the foreign currency into U.S. dollars subsequent to receipt will have foreign exchange gain or loss based on such gain,any appreciation or depreciation in the value of the foreign currency against the U.S. holderdollar, which will notgenerally be able to use the corresponding foreign tax credit, unless the holder has other foreignU.S. source ordinary income of the appropriate type in respect of which the credit may be used.or loss.

     AExcept as described in "U.S. Backup Withholding and Information Reporting " section below, a non-U.S. holder of ADSs will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax or withholding tax on gain realized on the sale or otherproceeds from the disposition of, an ADS unless (i) such gainADSs, unless:

  • the item is effectively connected with the conduct by the non-U.S. holder of a trade or business in the U.S., (ii) such holder isUnited States and, in the case of a former citizen or long-term resident of a country which has a tax treaty with the United States, the item is attributable to a "controlled foreign corporation",permanent establishment or, in the case of an individual, a "foreign personal holding company", a corporation which accumulates earnings to avoid U.S. federal income tax, or isfixed place of a certain type of foreign charitable organization, each withinbusiness, in the meaning of United States;
  • the Code, or (iii) suchnon-U.S. holder is ansubject to tax under the provisions of United States tax law applicable to U.S. expatriates; or
  • the individual whonon-U.S. holder is present in the U.S.United States for 183 days or more in the taxable year of thea sale and certain other conditions are met.

Passive Foreign Investment Company

     Special tax rules apply to the timing and character of income received by a U.S. holder of a Passive Foreign Investment Company, or PFIC. We would constitute a PFIC if either 75% or more of our gross income in a tax year is passive income or the average percentage of our assets (by value) that produce or are held for the production of passive income is at least 50%. We believe that we are not a passive foreign investment company ("PFIC")PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes in the current taxable year and do not expect to become a PFIC in future taxable years. However, because the determination of whether the offered sharesADSs constitute shares of a PFIC will be based upon the composition of our income and assets on an annual basis, there is no assurance that we will not be considered a PFIC for any subsequent year. If the offered shares wereADSs are shares of a PFIC for any fiscalsubsequent tax year, a U.S. holder of the offered sharesADSs could be subject to adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences with respect to any gainsgain realized on the sale or other disposition of the offered sharesADSs and certain distributions received with respect to the offered shares. WeADSs. While these U.S. tax consequences could be minimized and/or eliminated if the U.S. holder made a “qualified electing fund” election in connection with our shares, we do not intend to provide you with information necessary for the "qualified electing fund" election to be made by U.S. holders in the case that we are deemed a PFIC. Holders and prospective purchasers of the ADSs should consult their own tax advisers regarding the PFIC rules and their effect on holding or purchasing the shares.

U.S. Backup Withholding and Information Reporting

     Distributions made in respect of offered shares,the ADSs, and proceeds from the sale or other disposition of offered shares,the ADSs, payable to a U.S. holder by a U.S. paying agent or other U.S. intermediary will be subject to information reporting requirements. If information-reporting requirements apply, distributions made to the U.S. holder will be reported to the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") and to the U.S. holder as may be required under applicable Treasury regulations. Backup withholding will also apply to any payments made to a U.S. holder if such U.S. holder fails to provide an accurate taxpayer identification number (social security number, individual taxpayer identification number or employer identification number) or certification of exempt status or is such U.S. holder is notified by the IRSUS Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) that it has failedthe holder is subject to backup withholding tax as a result of the failure to report all dividends or interest required to be shown on its U.S. federal income tax return. In addition, certain penalties may be imposed by the IRS on a U.S. holder that is required to supply such information but that does not do so.

151


Table of Contents

     Information reporting and backup withholding are generally not required with respect to payments made by a U.S. paying agent or other U.S. intermediary to certain exempt U.S. holders (e.g., corporations and tax-exempt organizations) and non-U.S. holders, provided that, in the case of non-U.S. holders, such non-U.S. holders file a timely and properly completed IRS Form W-8, certifying its foreign status or W-8BENotherwise establishing an exemption, with the U.S. paying agent or intermediary.

     Any amount withheld under the backup withholding rulings will be allowed as a refund or credit against a holder's U.S. federal income tax liability provided the required information is furnished to the IRS in a timely manner. Each holder should consult its own tax advisor concerning the effect of the New Regulations on its ownership and disposition of Preferred Shares orthe ADSs.

133


Table of Contents

Independent Auditors

     Our audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2002, 20032004 and 20042005 and for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2004 and 20042005 prepared in conformity with Brazilian GAAP with reconciliation of shareholders' equity and statements of operations to U.S.US GAAP, included in this annual report, have been audited by KPMG Auditores Independentes, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board as stated in their report which is included herein. The offices of KPMG Auditores Independentes are located at Avenida Almirante Barroso 52, 174o andar, Rio de Janeiro, RJ – 20031-000, Brazil.

Documents on Display

     Statements contained in this Annual Report regarding the contents of any contract or other document are complete in all material respects, however, where the contract or other document is an exhibit to this Annual Report, each of these statements is qualified in all respects by the provisions of the actual contract or other documents.

     This Annual Report may be reviewed without charge at the Public Reference Section of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth100 F Street, N.W.N.E., Room 1300, Washington, D.C. 20549.

     Copies of all or any portion of this Annual Report can be obtained from the Public Reference Section of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth100 F Street, N.W., Room 1300,N.E. Washington, D.C. 20549, upon payment of fees prescribed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. For further information on the public reference rooms, call the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330. Our SEC filings are also available to the public on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. The address of the SEC’s website is provided for the information of investors and is not an active link.

     We are subject to the information requirements of the Exchange Act applicable to a foreign private issuer, and accordingly, we must file or furnish reports, including annual reports on Form 20-F, reports on Form 6-K, and other information, with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. These reports and other information can be inspected at, and subject to the payment of any required fees, copies may be obtained from, the public reference facilities maintained by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as described above. These reports and other information may also be inspected and copied at the offices of the New York Stock Exchange, 20 Broad Street, New York, New York 10005. As a foreign private issuer, however, we will be exempt from the proxy requirements of Section 14 of the Exchange Act and from the short-swing profit recovery rules of Section 16 of the Exchange Act, although the rules of the New York Stock Exchange may require that we solicit proxies from our shareholders under some circumstances.

     Our website is located at http://www.brasiltelecom.com.br. The information on our website is not part of this Annual Report.

152


Table of Contents

ITEM 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market RiskQUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Quantitative Information About Market Risk

     We are exposed to market risk from changes in both foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. We are exposed to foreign exchange rate risk because certain of our costs are denominated in currencies (primarily the U.S. dollar) other than those in which we earn revenues (primarily thereal). Similarly, we are subject to market risk deriving from changes in interest rates that may affect the cost of our financing.

The principal market for our products and services is Brazil and substantially all of our revenues are denominated inreais. We have described under Item 4 "Information“Item 4. Information on the Company—History and Development of the Company" the manner in which the Brazilian government has controlled, and continues to control, the prices we charge.

     Due to the increasing volatility of exchange rates, we decided to hedge some of our foreign currency denominated indebtedness. We do not hold or issue derivative or other financial instruments for trading purposes.

134


Table of Contents

Exchange Rate Risk

     We also face foreign exchange risk because a significant portion of our equipment costs, such as costs relating to switching centers and software used for upgrading network capacity, are primarily denominated in U.S. dollars. Since 2001, approximately 35.0% of our total capital expenditures have been U.S. dollar denominated. Our cost of financing, however, is not materially exposed to exchange rate risk.

     At December 31, 2004,2005, approximately 30.2%,29.3% or R$1,596.41,336.7 million, of our indebtedness was denominated in foreign currency.exposed to exchange rate risk. At December 31, 2004,2005, we hedged approximately 48.1%57.2% of our foreign currency indebtedness affected by exchange rate variation, against significant variations in exchange rates (U.S. dollars,(dollars, Japanese Yens andCesta de Moedas)Moedas) by using foreign currency swap contracts.contracts and foreign currency investments. The aggregate notional principal amount of the swap contracts is approximately U.S$288.9287.2 million, of which approximately U.S.$36.6US$52.3 million matures within one year and approximately U.S.$144.9US$115.0 million matures in one to three years. At December 31, 2004,2005, the fair value of the swap contracts amounted to approximately R$88.9328.6 million. See Notes 31b and 31c to our audited financial statements for additional information regarding the swap contracts.

     In 2004,2005, losses on foreign currency and monetary restatement amounted to approximately R$4.6 million, due to the appreciation of thereal against the U.S. dollar. At December 31, 2004, the potential immediate loss in earnings that we could sustain from2005, a hypothetical unfavorable 10.0% change in foreign currency exchange rates would beresult in an increase of approximately R$70.8 million.82.7 million in our debt obligations

Interest Rate Risk

     At December 31, 2004,2005, we had approximately R$5,281.54,908.2 million in loans and financing outstanding, of which R$4,610.83,957,6 million bore interest at floating rates and R$670.7601,5 million bore interest at fixed rates. We invest our excess liquidity (approximately R$2,397.81,730.1 million in 2004)2005) mainly in investment funds created by top Brazilian asset managements exclusively for us. The fund managers are responsible for managing these funds, subject to the certain direction of our senior management.management and board of directors. Currently, these funds carry mainly bond and other financial instruments linked to the CDI rate, issued by the Government. The potential loss in earnings to us over one year that would have resulted from a hypothetical, instantaneous and unfavorable change of 100 basis points in the interest rates applicable to our financial assets and liabilities in 20042005 would be approximately R$9.7 million.44.2 million to our financial liabilities and R$1.7 million to our financial assets. The above sensitivity analysis is based on the assumption of an unfavorable 100 basis points movement of the interest rates applicable to each homogeneous category of financial assets and liabilities and sustained over a period of one year. A homogeneous category is defined according to the currency in which financial assets and liabilities are denominated and assumes the same interest rate movement within each homogeneous category (e.g.,reais). As a result, our interest rate risk sensitivity model may overstate the impact of interest rate fluctuation for such financial instruments, as consistently unfavorable movements of all interest rates are unlikely.

153


Table of Contents

     The table below provides summary information regarding our exposure to interest rate and exchange rate risk before hedge adjustments in our total debt portfolio as of December 31, 2004:2005:

 Total Debt Portfolio  
Total Debt Portfolio 
  
 R$ million   R$million  
    
Floating rate debt:         
Realdenominated  3,818.5  74.1  3,465.2  76.0 
Foreign currency denominated  663.6  12.9  492.4  10.8 
Fixed rate debt:         
Realdenominated  16.0  0.3  29.8  0.7 
Foreign currency denominated  657.2  12.7  571.7  12.5 
    
Total (before hedge adjustments)  5,155.3  100.0  4,559.1  100.0 
    
Hedge adjustments         
Hedge adjustments  126.2  N.A.  349.1  N.A. 
Total  5,281.5    4,908.2   
    

     As of December 31, 2004,2005, approximately 28.7%24.3% of our total debt portfolio before hedge adjustments was tied to the CDI rate. As of December 31, 2004, the CDI rate accumulated for the year was 16.71%19.0% per annum.

135


Table of Contents

     The table below provides information about our debt obligations as of December 31, 2004,2005, which are sensitive to changes in interest rates and exchange rates. This table presents, by expected maturity dates and currency, the principal cash flows and related average interest rates of these obligations. Variable interest rates are based on the applicable reference rate (LIBOR, CDI, IGP-M or TJLP) as of December 31, 2004:2005:

 Total Short-Term Debt 2005              Fair Value Long Term Debt 
              
Debt Obligation   2006   2007   2008  2009  2010  After 2010   Total Short-Term 
Debt 2006 
 2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  After 2011  Fair Value 
Long Term 
Debt 
         
Debt in Japanese Yen:                   
Fixed rate debt           612.4  564.3  564.3  564.3  282.2     0.0           0.0  1,975.1  0.4 0.4 0.4 0.2 1.1 
Average interest rate               3.4%  3.4%     3.4%     3.4%  3.4%     3.4%           3.4%    3.4% 3.4% 3.4% 3.4% 
Variable rate debt  3,457.3  55,947.0   111,894.0   111,894.0  111,894.0  111,894.0  55,947.0  559,469.8  42.8 85.6 85.6 85.6 85.6 42.8 85.1 
Average interest rate               2.0%  2.0%     2.0%     2.0%  2.0%     2.0%           2.0%    2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 
Debt in U.S. Dollars:                 
Debt in Dollars:  
Fixed rate debt                 29,522.2  7,983.8         7,983.8       7,983.8  7,983.8     7,983.8  585,234.5  636,231.7  7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 509.0 587.8 
Average interest rate               8.1%  8.1%     8.1%     8.1%  8.1%     8.1%           8.1%    8.2% 8.2% 8.2% 8.2% 8.2% 8.2% 8.2% 
Variable rate debt                 32,990.4  18,459.9       12,500.0     12,228.0  11,835.8     9,653.4           2,992.5  67,669.7  16.4 11.2 10.9 10.6 8.7 2.3 0.7 44.4 
Average interest rate               4.1%  4.1%     4.1%     4.1%  4.1%     4.1%           4.1%    5.4% 5.4% 5.4% 5.4% 5.4% 5.4% 5.4% 
Debt in Brazilian                 
reais:                 
Debt in Brazilian reais:  
Fixed rate debt  5,171.3  5,000.0         5,000.0  416.7  0.0     0.0     419.2  10,835.8  5.0 5.0 0.4 19.0 24.4 
Average interest rate  13.7%  13.7%   13.7%   13.7%  13.7%   13.7%  13.7%    6.5% 6.5% 6.5% 6.5% 6.5% 6.5% 6.5% 
Variable rate debt(1)             1,007,529.8  1,124,479.0   625,329.5   237,601.2  647,359.3  147,359.7  28,814.1  2,673,843.8  1,216.6 736.4 343.6 750.1 250.1 47.9 2,122.2 
Average interest rate  15.6%  15.6%   15.6%   15.6%  15.6%   15.6%  15.6%    15.1% 15.1% 15.1% 15.1% 15.1% 15.1% 15.1% 
Total debt                 
obligations(1)             1,079,283.4  1,212,434.0   763,271.5   370,687.9  779,355.0  276,890.9  673,407.2  3,950,025.9  1,288.2 845.6 448.0 853.5 351.4 100.0 528.8 3,165.0 
         
Hedge Adjustments                 23,849.6  25,944.6       25,687.1     15,148.9  14,605.1  14,082.3           6,850.7  65,558.4  57.4 81.6 62.8 60.5 58.4 28.4 328.6 
         
Total             1,103,133.0  1,238,378.6   788,958.6   385,836.8  793,960.2  290,973.2  680,258.0  4,015,584.3  1,345.6 927.2 510.8 914.0 409.8 128.4 528.8 3,493.6 
         

154


Table of Contents

Hedging Policy

     We constantly evaluate and consider alternatives with respect to hedging foreign exchange risk in connection with our foreign currency indebtedness and have currently entered into hedging contracts with respect to short-term payments of our foreign currency debt.

136155


Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 14. Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of ProceedsMATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS

     We were required to pay a non-cumulative preferred dividend on our Preferred Shares in an amount equal to 6.0% of the share capital attributable to our Preferred Shares under Brazilian Corporation Law. Law 10,303, dated October 31, 2001, which amended the Brazilian Corporation Law requirement that we pay a non-cumulative preferred dividend on our Preferred Shares of at least 3.0% per year of the book value of Shareholders' equity divided by our total number of shares. On December 19, 2002 we amended our Bylaws to comply with these new requirements. Preferred Shareholders are now entitled to receive a minimum non-cumulative dividend of Preferred Dividend equal to the greatest of (i) 6.0% per year of the value of our total share capital divided by our total number of shares or (ii) 3.0% per year of the book value of our shareholders' equity divided by the total number of our shares.

ITEM 15. Controls and ProceduresCONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

     Disclosure controls and proceduresprocedures.. Our management with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Exchange Act) as of December 31, 2004.2005. Based on such evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of December 31, 2004,2005, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be discussed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act.effective.

Changes in internal controls. There have been no significant changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the year ended December 31, 2004our fourth fiscal quarter of 2005 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. However, although

     As foreign private issuers we are not yet subject to disclosure requirements regarding internal control over financial reporting,reporting. However, we have already started the process of reviewing our framework of internal controls, in order to attain appropriate certification from our independent auditors in 2005.for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006.

ITEM16A. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT

     On December 19, 2005 following the Sarbanes Oxley Act exemption we announced that our Fiscal Council would be given expanded powers, authority and responsibilities and would function as an Audit Committee Financial Expert

     Because we have not established an audit committee, our entire board of directors is deemed our audit committee under section 3(a)(58)in compliance with Rule 303A.06 of the Exchange Act. Our board of directors has not yet determined whether any of theNYSE Rules. All four members of the board of directors is anFiscal Council have the required skills to be the audit committee financial expert as such term is defined for the purposes of this Item 16A. We do not have such an audit committee financial expert because we are not required to do so under Brazilian law. We are not required to comply with these requirements until July 31, 2005.16A

ITEM 16B. Code of EthicsCODE OF ETHICS

     We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to all officers and employees. A copy of our code of ethics may be found on our website at:http://www.brasiltelecom.com.br. A copy of the code of ethics may also be obtained free of charge by contacting our investor relations department at (+55) 61 415-1256.3415-1140. No waivers, either explicit or implicit, of provisions of the code of ethics were granted in 2004.2005.

ITEM 16C. Principal Accountant Fees and Services16C PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

     KPMG Auditores Independentes served as our independent registered public accounting firm for the years ended December 31, 2002, 20032004 and 20042005 appearing in this annual report on Form 20-F.

137


Table of Contents

     The following table presents the aggregate fees for professional services and other services rendered by KPMG Auditores Independentes to us in 2002, 20032004 and 20042005 in thousands of reais.

  2004  2003  2002 
    
 
Audit Fees  R$1,635  R$1,528  R$739 
Audit-related Fees  393  - -  10 
Tax Fees  10  41  34 
All Other Fees  - -  - -  - - 
    
 
Total  R$2,038  R$1,569  R$783 
    

156


Table of Contents
  2005  2004 
    
Audit Fees  R$2,670  R$1,635 
Audit-related Fees  190  393 
Tax Fees   10 
All Other Fees   
   
 
Total  R$2,860  R$2,038 
   

     Audit Fees are fees agreed upon with KPMG Auditores Independentes for the fiscal years 2002, 20032004 and 20042005 (including related expenses) for the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements and for the reviews of our quarterly financial statements submitted on Form 6-K, including the reviews of our annual report on Form 20-F.

     Audit-related Fees consist of fees billed by KPMG Auditores Independentes for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the company's financial statements or that are traditionally performed by the external auditor, and include consultations concerning financial accounting and reporting standards, issuance of confortcomfort letters, internal control reviews, and review of security controls and operational effectiveness of systems.

     Tax Fees include fees billed for tax compliance services, including the review of the original, as well as seminars and training regarding changes in, Brazilian tax legislation.

Audit committee pre-approval policies and procedures

     Our board of directors requires management to obtain the board's approval before engaging independent outside auditors to provide any audit or permitted non-audit services to us, or our subsidiaries. Pursuant to this policy, our board of directors pre-approves all audit and non-audit services provided by KPMG Auditores Independentes, our principal auditor. Pursuant to the board's pre-approval process, each year, KPMG prepares a detailed list of services that it proposes to perform during the coming year. These proposed services are presented to the board of directors, which considers and approves the services. Management is not permitted to engage our outside auditors for any audit or non-audit service that is not on the list of services approved by the board of directors without first returning the board of directors for approval of such additional services. In 2005, all of the services described under Audit-Related Fees and Tax Fees were approved by the audit committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.

138ITEM 16D EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES

     On August 1, 2005, we announced that our Fiscal Council would be given expanded powers, authority and responsibilities and would function as an Audit Committee in compliance with Rule 303A.06 of the NYSE Rules. Accordingly, we are relying on the exemption afforded by Rule 10A-3(c)(3) under the Exchange Act with respect to the independence standards of Rule 10A-3(b)(1)(iv) of the Exchange Act. We do not believe that such reliance will materially adversely affect the ability of our Audit Committee to act independently and to satisfy the other requirements of Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act.

157


Table of Contents

ITEM 16E. PurchasesPURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS

     The table below sets forth, for the periods indicated, the total number of Equity Securitiesshares purchased by us or on our behalf, or by an affiliated purchaser or on behalf of an affiliated purchaser, the Issueraverage price paid per share, the total number of shares purchased as a part of a publicly announced repurchase plan or program and Affiliated Purchasersthe maximum number (or approximatereal value) of shares that may yet be purchased under our plans and programs.

Period  Total Number of Shares Purchased  Average Price Paid Per Share (R$)  Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Programs(2)  Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Programs(3) 
     
 
January 2004                     -  N.A.  4,847,200,000,000  13,911,666,980,000 
February 2004                     -  N.A.  4,847,200,000,000  13,911,666,980,000 
March 2004                     -  N.A.  4,847,200,000,000  13,911,666,980,000 
April 2004                     -  N.A.  4,847,200,000,000  13,911,666,980,000 
May 2004                     -  N.A.  4,847,200,000,000  13,911,666,980,000 
June 2004                     -  N.A.  4,847,200,000,000  13,911,666,980,000 
July 2004                     -  N.A.  4,847,200,000,000  13,911,666,980,000 
August 2004                     -  N.A.  4,847,200,000,000  13,911,666,980,000 
September 14-30, 2004(1)  310,100,000,000  11.29  5,157,300,000,000  13,601,566,980,000 
October 2004  2,084,600,000,000  11.41  7,241,900,000,000  11,516,966,980,000 
November 2004  620,300,000,000  11.51  7,862,200,000,000  10,896,666,980,000 
December 2004  243,400,000,000  12.74  8,105,600,000,000  10,653,266,980,000 
January 2005  3,407,800,000,000  11.30  11,513,400,000,000  7,245,466,980,000 
February 2005  1,453,300,000,000  10.97  12,966,700,000,000  5,792,166,980,000 
March 2005  711,400,000,000  10.93  13,678,100,000,000  5,080,766,980,000 
     
 
Total  8,830,900,000,000  11.30  13,678,100,000,000  5,080,766,980,000 
     
    Average  Total Number of  Maximum 
    Price  Shares Purchased  Number of Shares 
    Paid Per  as Part of Publicly  that May Yet Be 
  Total Number of  Share  Announced  Purchased Under 
Period  Shares Purchased  (R$) Programs(2) the Programs(3)
     
 
January 2005  3,407,800,000  11.30  11,513,400,000  7,245,466,980 
February 2005  1,453,300,000  10.97  12,966,700,000  5,792,166,980 
March 2005  711,400,000  10.93  13,678,100,000  5,080,766,980 
April 2005  --  --  13,678,100,000  5,080,766,980 
May 2005  --  --  13,678,100,000  5,080,766,980 
June 2005  --  --  13,678,100,000  5,080,766,980 
July 2005  --  --  13,678,100,000  5,080,766,980 
August 2005  --  --  13,678,100,000  5,080,766,980 
September 2005  --  --  13,678,100,000  5,080,766,980 
October 2005  --  --  --  -- 
November 2005  --  --  --  -- 
December 2005  --  --  --  -- 
January 2006  --  --  --  -- 
February 2006  --  --  --  -- 
March 2006  --  --  --  -- 
     
Total  5,572,500,000  11.07  13,678,100,000  5,080,766,980 
     

     (1)The Fifth Repurchase Program of the Company was announced on September 13, 2004.
(2)Under the Fifth Repurchase Program up to 18,760,149,302,000 Preferred shares may be repurchased in 
the 365-day period started on September 14, 2004. 
(3)As of September 10, 2004, the Company had 1,282,322,000 Preferred Shares in treasury as a result of the 
incorporation of CRT. 

(2)Under the Fifth Repurchase Program up to 18,760,149,302,000 Preferred shares may be repurchased in the 365-day period started on September 14, 2004.
(3)As of December 31, 2005, the Company had 1,282,322,000 Preferred Shares in treasury as a result of the incorporation of CRT.

139158


Table of Contents

PART III

ITEM 17. Financial StatementsFINANCIAL STATEMENTS

     We have responded to Item 18 in lieu of responding to this Item.

ITEM 18. Financial StatementsFINANCIAL STATEMENTS

     Reference is made to pages F-1 through F-93 forF-101for our Financial Statements.

ITEM 19. ExhibitsEXHIBITS

     The following is a list of all exhibits filed as a part of this Annual Report on Form 20-F:

Exhibit  
Number Exhibit 
1.1 
Amended and Restated Charter of the Registrant.(1)
1.2 
Amended and Restated Charter of the Registrant (English translation).(1)
2.1 
Form of Deposit Agreement to be executed among the Registrant, Citibank N.A., as Depositary, and the Holders and Beneficial Owners of American Depositary Shares evidenced by American Depositary Receipts issued thereunder.(2)
2.2 
Indenture dated February 17, 2004, among Brasil Telecom S.A., The Bank of New York, as indenture trustee, registrar, New York paying agent and transfer agent, and The Bank of Tokyo- Mitsubishi Ltd., as principal paying agent.(3)
3.1 
Amendment to the Amended and Restated Shareholders' Agreement.(4)
3.2 
4.1 
Standard Concession Agreement for Local, Switched, Fixed-Line Telephone Service.(2)
4.2 
Standard Concession Agreement for Local, Switched, Fixed-Line Telephone Service and Schedule of Omitted Concession contracts (English translation).(2)(5)
4.3 
Standard Concession Agreement for Domestic Long-Distance, Switched, Fixed-Line Telephone Service.(2)
4.4 
Standard Concession Agreement for Domestic Long-Distance, Switched, Fixed-Line Telephone Service and Schedule of Omitted Concession Agreements (English translation).(2)(5)
4.5 
Registration Rights Agreement dated February 17, 2004 between Brasil Telecom S.A. and Citigroup Global Markets Inc. as initial purchaser.(3)
4.6 
Company Support Agreement dated February 17, 2004 between Brasil Telecom S.A. and the Overseas Private Investment Corporation.(3)
4.7 
Insurance Trust Agreement dated February 17, 2004, between Brasil Telecom S.A. and The Bank of New York, as insurance trustee.(3)
4.8 
Loan Agreement dated March 24, 2004 among Brasil Telecom S.A. and Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, and the lenders named therein.(3)
4.9 
Indemnity Agreement dated March 24, 2004 among Brasil Telecom S.A., Japan Bank for International Corporation and Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation.(3)
4.10 
Merger Agreement among TIM International N.V. and Brasil Telecom S.A., dated as of April 28, 2005 canceled on May 2, 2006 (reference on page. 17).
8.1 
12.1 
12.2 

140159


Table of Contents

Exhibit  
Number Exhibit 
13.the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 
13.
_______________________________

(1)     Filed as an Exhibit to the Company's Annual Report on Form 20-F, filed on July 15, 2002.
(2)     Filed as an Exhibit to Amendment 1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form 20-F filed on October 31, 2001.
(3)     Filed as an Exhibit to the Company´sCompany’s Annual Report on Form 20-F filed on June 23, 2004.
(4)     Filed with the Company's report on Form 6-K, filed on October 9, 2002.
(5)     Pursuant to Rule 12b-31 under the Exchange Act, Company is not filing a copy of each concession agreement for each region because such are substantially identical except as enumerated in a schedule.
 

141160


Table of Contents

INDEX OF DEFINED TERMS

Adjusted Net Income 114  Mandatory Dividend 113 
ADRs 101  MetroRED 25 
ADSs 101, 129  MTH 25 
American Depositary Shares 101  non-Brazilian holder 126 
Anatel 29  non-U.S. holder 130 
Anatel Decree 56  PCS 25 
ATM 34  PFIC 131 
BOVESPA 98  PIS 49 
Brazilian Securities Law 120  Preferred Dividend 113 
BrTSi 24  RealPlan 
BrTurbo 33  Registered Capital 129 
Center 91  Registrant 
Code 129  Registration Statement 121 
COFINS 49  Resolution 2,689 118 
Commercial Market  SFAS 
Common Shares 101  Sistel Plan 92 
Contingency Reserve 114  SLDD 34 
CPMF tax 128  Statutory Reserve 114 
CTMR 21  STJ 43 
CVM  TBS 24 
Dedicated IP 34  TCSPrev 93 
DialNet 34  Teleacre 21 
DLD basket 43, 62  Telebrás 21 
e&p 130  Telebrasília 21 
Embratel 23  Telecommunications Regulations 21 
FCRT 93  Telegoiás 21 
FENATTEL 100  Telemar 23 
FISTEL 83  Telemat 21 
FITTEL 100  Telems 21 
Floating Market  Telepar 21 
FUNTTEL 80  Teleron 21 
FUST 80  Telesc 21 
GDP 39  TJLP 69 
General Telecommunications Law 21  TU-M 66 
Global Crossing 54  TU-RIU 66 
IBGE 39, 68  TU-RL 66 
ICMS 48  U.S. GAAP 
IGP-M  Unrealized Revenue 114 
INPI 56  Unrealized Revenue Reserve 114 
IOF tax 128  Vant 27 
IPCA index 43  VC-1 77 
IRS 131  VC-2 78 
Light IP 141  VC-3 78 
List of Obligations 56  Vetor 34 
local basket 43, 62  VU-M 46, 66 
Adjusted Net Income 134 
ADRs 118 
ADSs 12 
American Depositary Shares 118 
Anatel 12 
Anatel Decree 70 
ATM 164 
BOVESPA 32 
Brazilian Securities Law 140 
BrTSi 31 
BrTurbo 35 
Center 62 
Code 150 
COFINS 25 
Commercial Market 10 
Common Shares 10 
Contingency Reserve 133 
CPMF tax 149 
CTMR 28 
CVM 
Dedicated IP 45 
DialNet 45 
DLD basket 55 
E&P 150 
Embratel 19 
FCRT 108 
FENATTEL 115 
FITTEL 115 
Floating Market 10 
FUNTTEL 61 
FUST 61 
GDP 52 
General Telecommunications Law 28 
IBGE 23 
ICMS 61 
INPI 69 
IOF 148 
IPCA index 24 
IRS 152 
Light IP 165 
local basket 55 
Mandatory Dividend 133 
Brasil Telecom Comunicação Multimidia 32 
MTH 32 
non-Brazilian holder 146 
non-U.S. holder 150 
PBS-A 107 
PCS 10 
PFIC 152 
PIS 25 
Preferred Dividend 133 
RealPlan 10 
Registered Capital 149 

142161


Table of Contents

Registrant 
Registration Statement 141 
Resolution 2,689 138 
SLDD 166 
Statutory Reserve 133 
STJ 15 
TBS 31 
TCSPrev 107 
Teleacre 28 
Telebrás 
Telebrasília 28 
Telecommunications Regulations 28 
Telegoiás 28 
Telemar 19 
Telemat 28 
Telems 28 
Telepar 28 
Teleron 28 
Telesc 28 
TJLP 82 
TU-RIU 58 
TU-RL 58 
US GAAP 
Unrealized Revenue 134 
Unrealized Revenue Reserve 134 
Vant 31 
VC-1 42 
VC-2 43 
VC-3 43 
Vetor 45 
VU-M 20 

162


Table of Contents

TECHNICAL GLOSSARY

     The following explanations are not intended as technical definitions, but to assist the general reader to understand certain terms as used in this Annual Report.

     ADSL (Asymmetric Digital Subscriber Line): A technology that allows conventional telephone services, as well as the delivery of high-speed data transmission to virtual private networks or to public internet networks over existing copper lines.

     ATM (Asynchronous Transfer Mode): A broadband switching technology that permits the use of one network for different kinds of information, such as voice, data and video.

     Band A Service Provider: A former Telebrás operating subsidiary that has been granted a concession to provide cellular telecommunications services in a particular area within a radio spectrum frequency range referred to by Anatel as "Band A."

Band B Service Provider: A cellular service provider that has been granted a concession to provide cellular telecommunications services in a particular area within a radio spectrum frequency range referred to by Anatel as "Band B."

Band D Service Provider: A cellular service provider that has been granted a concession to provide cellular telecommunications services in a particular area within a radio spectrum frequency range referred to by Anatel as "Band D."

Band E Service Provider: A cellular service provider that has been granted a concession to provide cellular telecommunications services in a particular area within a radio spectrum frequency range referred to by Anatel as "Band E."

     Base station: A radio transmitter/receiver that maintains communications with the cellular telephones within a given cell. Each base station in turn is interconnected with other base stations and with the public switched telephone network.

     Broadband services: Services characterized by a transmission speed of 2 Mbit/second or more. According to international standards, these services are divided into two categories: (i) Interactive Services, including video-telephone/video-conferencing (both point-to-point and multipoint), video-monitoring, interconnection of local networks, file transfer, high-speed fax, e-mail for moving images or mixed documents, broadband videotext, video on demand, retrieval of sound programs or fixed and moving images, and (ii) Broadcast Services, such as sound programs, television programs (including high-definition TV and pay TV) and selective document acquisition.

Cell: The geographic area covered by a single base station in a cellular telecommunications system.

     Cellular serviceservice(or Mobile Service): A mobile telecommunications service provided by means of a network of interconnected low-powered base stations, each of which covers one small geographic cell within the total cellular telecommunications system service area.

     Dedicated IP: A service for Internet hosting that does not use the virtual shared hosting system. The virtual shared hosting system is a system in which an IP number is assigned to multiple dominion names. Dedicated IP hosting accounts allow users to have their own log files, true CGI-bins, telnet accounts, and many other unique configuration files. The service provides a foundation for other IP applications, such as e-mail, web hosting, eCommerce, and home banking and enables business productivity through the use of web access, file transfer, multimedia presentation, video-conferencing, collaborative applications and new readers.

     DialNet: A service that offers remote access through a switched telephone network to Internet providers or corporations.

     Digital: A mode of representing a physical variable, such as speech, using digits 0 and 1. The digits are transmitted in binary form as a series of pulses. Digital networks allow for higher capacity and higher flexibility through the use of computer-related technology for the transmission and manipulation of telephone calls. Digital systems offer lower noise interference and can incorporate encryption as a protection from external interference.

163


Table of Contents

     Digital Subscriber Line Access Multiplexer: a network device, usually at a telephone company central office, that receives signals from multiple customer Digital Subscriber Line (DSL) connections and puts the signals on a high-speed backbone line using multiplexing techniques. Depending on the product, DSLAM multiplexers

143


Table of Contents

connect DSL lines with some combination of asynchronous transfer mode (ATM), frame relay, or Internet Protocol networks. DSLAM enables a phone company to offer business or homes users the fastest phone line technology (DSL) with the fastest backbone network technology (ATM).

Fiber-optics: A transmission medium which permits extremely high capacities of data transmission. It consists of a thin strand of glass that provides a pathway along which waves of light can travel for telecommunications purposes.

     Frame Relay: A data transmission service using protocols based on direct use of transmission lines.

     Internet: A collection of interconnected networks spanning the entire world, including university, corporate, government and research networks from around the globe. These networks all use the IP communications protocol.

     IP WAN: A service that allows for the interconnection of corporate networks located in several distant locations for applications that do not need band guarantee. This service also provides for the formation of data communications networks without protocol conversion.

     IP (Internet Protocol): The language of the Internet; a set of rules that specify how information is divided into jackets and addressed for delivery between computer systems.

     IT (Information Technology): The equipment, processes, procedures and systems used to provide and support information systems (computerized and manual) within an organization and those reaching out to customers and suppliers.

     Kbps: Kilobytes per second.

     Light IP: A service for Internet hosting that uses the virtual shared hosting system. The virtual shared hosting system is a system in which an IP number is assigned to multiple dominion names.

     Log files: Files that track access activity for a host resource. For instance, a log file might contain information relative to those who access a web site.

     Mbps: Megabytes per second.

     Network: An interconnected collection of elements. In a telephone network, these consist of switches connected to each other and to customer equipment. The transmission equipment may be based on fiber-optic or metallic cable or point-to-point radio connections.

     Network usage charge: Amount per minute charged by network operators for the use of their network by other network operators. Also known as an "interconnection charge" or "access charge."

     Optical fiber: A transmission medium which permits extremely high capacities of data transmission. It consists of a thin strand of glass that provides a pathway along which waves of light can travel for telecommunications purposes.

     Packet-switched data communications services: Data services that are based on parceling or breaking data stream into packets and switching the individual packets. Information that is transmitted is segmented into cells of a standardized length, which are then transmitted independently of one another, allowing maximization of available capacity and usage of a single transmission path for multiple communications. The cells are then reassembled upon reaching their destination.

Packet switching: A method of data transmission in which small blocks of data are transmitted rapidly over a channel dedicated to the connection only for the duration of the packet's transmission.

Penetration: The measurement of the take-up of services. Penetration is calculated by dividing the number of subscribers at any given time by the population to whom the service is available and multiplying the quotient by 100.

144


Table of Contents

     Private leased circuits: Voice, data or image transmission mediums leased to users for their exclusive use.

164


Table of Contents

Public Switched Telephone Network (“PSTN”):The concentration of the world's public circuit-switched telephone networks. Originally a network of fixed-line analog telephone systems, the PSTN is now almost entirely digital, and now includes mobile as well as fixed telephones—delivering basic telephone service and, in certain circumstances, more advanced services.

     Satellite services: Used for links with countries that cannot be reached by cable, or as an alternative to cable, and to form closed user networks.

     SDH (Synchronous Digital Hierarchy): A hierarchical set of digital transport structures, standardized for the transport of suitably adapted payloads over physical transmission networks.

     SLDD: A digital dedicated line service with speed options varying between 1.2Kbps1.2 Kbps and 2Mbps,2 Mbps, that allows data transfer with practically null delay and transparency to protocols. SLDD makes it possible to form point to point or multi-point networks by means of dedicated circuits.

STFC: The public switched telephone network that delivers basic telephone service and, in certain circumstances, more advanced services.

     Switch: Used to set up and route telephone calls either to the number called or to the next switch along the path. They may also record information for billing and control purposes. Also known as an "exchange."

     Telnet: A program that allows the user to connect to other computers on the Internet. The process by which a person using one computer can sign on to a computer in another city, state or country.

     Universal service: The obligation to supply basic service to all users throughout the national territory at reasonable prices.

     Value Added Services: Services that provide additional functionality to the basic transmission services offered by a telecommunications network.

     VC-1: Rate for local calls made from fixed-line to cellular.

     VC-2: Rate for calls made from fixed-line to cellular, outside the cellular subscriber's registration area but inside the region where the respective cellular provider provides service.

     VC-3: Rate for calls made from fixed-line to cellular, outside the cellular subscriber's registration area and outside the region where the respective cellular provider provides service.

145165


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

     The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this Annual Report on its behalf.

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.
 By: /s/ Carla Cico
 
  Name: Carla Cico Ricardo Knoepfelmacher
        Title: Chief Executive Officer 
 
 
 By: /s/ Paulo Pedrão Rio Branco
 
        Name: Paulo Pedrão Rio BrancoCharles Laganá Putz 
          Title:  Financial Executive Officer 

Dated: June 14, 2005

146__, 2006


Table of Contents

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Exhibit
     
Exhibit   Sequential 
Number  Exhibit  Numbering 
 
1.1  
Amended and Restated Charter of the Registrant(1)
 ¯ 
 
1.2  
Amended and Restated Charter of the Registrant (English translation)(1)
 ¯ 
 
2.1  
Form of Deposit Agreement to be executed among the Registrant, Citibank N.A., as 
Depositary, and the Holders and Beneficial Owners of American Depositary Shares 
evidenced by American Depositary Receipts issued thereunder(2) ¯ 
 
2.2  Indenture dated February 17, 2004, among Brasil Telecom, The Bank of New York, 
as indenture trustee, registrar, New York paying agent and transfer agent, and The 
Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi Ltd., as principal paying agent   
 
3.1  
Amendment to the Amended and Restated Shareholders' Agreement(3)
 ¯ 
 
3.2  
entered into on April 28, 2005 ¯ 
 
4.1  
Standard Concession Agreement for Local, Switched, Fixed-Line Telephone Service(2)
 
Service(2)¯ 
 
4.2  
Standard Concession Agreement for Local, Switched, Fixed-Line Telephone 
Service and Schedule of Omitted Concession Agreement (English translation)(2)(4) 
translation)(2)(4)¯ 
 
4.3  
Standard Concession Agreement for Domestic Long-Distance, Switched, Fixed- 
LineFixed-Line Telephone Service(2) ¯ 
 
4.4  
Standard Concession Agreement for Domestic Long-Distance, Switched, Fixed- 
LineFixed-Line Telephone Service and Schedule of Omitted Concession Agreements (English translation)(2)(4) 
translation)(2)(4)¯
 
4.5  Registration Rights Agreement dated February 17, 2004 between Brasil Telecom 
S.A. and Citigroup Global Markets Inc. as initial purchaser  ¯ 
 
4.6  Company Support Agreement dated February 17, 2004 between Brasil Telecom 
S.A. and the Overseas Private Investment Corporation  ¯ 
 
4.7  Insurance Trust Agreement dated February 17, 2004, between Brasil Telecom S.A. 
and The Bank of New York, as insurance trustee  ¯
 
4.8  Loan Agreement dated March 24, 2004 among Brasil Telecom S.A. and Sumitomo 
Mitsui Banking Corporation and the lenders named therein  ¯ 
 
4.9  Indemnity Agreement dated March 24, 2004 among Brasil Telecom S.A., Japan 
Bank for International Corporation and Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation.  ¯ 
 
4.10  Merger Agreement among TIM International N.V. and Brasil Telecom S.A., dated
as of April 28, 2005 canceled on May 2, 2006 (reference on page. 17). ¯ 
 
8.1  
under which they do business ¯
  ¯ 

147


Table of Contents

Exhibit
     
Exhibit    Sequential 
Number  Exhibit  Numbering 
 
12.1  Certification of Carla Cico,Ricardo Knoepfelmacher, Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002         ¯ 
12.2Certification of Paulo Pedrão Rio Branco, Financial Executive Officer, pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  ¯ 
 
12.2Certification of Charles Laganá Putz, Financial Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002¯ 
13.  Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002¯ 
   ¯ 
________________________

(1)     Filed as an Exhibit to the Company's Annual Report on Form 20-F, filed on July 15, 2002.
(2)     Filed as an Exhibit to Amendment 1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form 20-F, filed on October 31, 2001.
(3)     Filed with the Company's Report on Form 6-K, filed on October 9, 2002.
(4)     Pursuant to Rule 12b-31 under the Exchange Act the Registrant is not filing a copy of each concession Agreement for each region because such agreements are substantially identical in all material respects except as enumerated in the schedule attached to each standard concession Agreement.
 





BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 20042005 AND 20032004 AND FOR EACH OF THE YEARS
IN THE THREE-YEAR PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20042005

F - 1


BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As of December 31, 20042005 and 20032004 and for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004

2005


CONTENTS

ReportsReport of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm F-3 
Consolidated Balance Sheets  F-4 
Consolidated Statements of Operations  F-5 
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity  F-6 
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows  F-7 
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements  F-8 to F-93F-106 

F - 2


Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Brasil Telecom S.A.
Brasília, DF

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Brasil Telecom S.A. (“The Company”) as of December 31, 20042005 and 2003,2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows and changes in shareholders’ equity for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004.2005. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Brasil Telecom S.A. as of December 31, 20042005 and 2003,2004, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004,2005, in conformity with Brazilian generally accepted accounting principles, (Brazilian GAAP), including recognition of the effects of changes in the purchasing power of the Brazilian currency through December 31, 2000, as discussed in Note 2.a and 2.b.

Accounting principles generally accepted in Brazil vary in certain significant respects from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Information relating to the nature and effect of such differences is presented in Note 33 to the consolidated financial statements.


/s/ KPMG Auditores Independentes

June 3, 200526, 2006
Brasília, DF

F - 3


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

As of December 31, 20032004 and 20042005
(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

   
   
2003 
2004 
   
      2004  2005 
   
Current assets:             
Cash and cash equivalents  Note 11  1,465,765  2,397,810  Note 11  2,397,810  1,730,083 
Trade accounts receivable, net  Note 12  1,859,713  2,111,579  Note 12  2,111,579  2,152,813 
Inventories, net  Note 13  8,042  174,033  Note 13  174,033  83,035 
Deferred and recoverable taxes  Note 14  501,281  735,700  Note 14  735,700  1,122,548 
Other assets  Note 15  150,724  382,892  Note 15  382,892  300,212 
      
Total current assets    3,985,525  5,802,014    5,802,014  5,388,691 
      
Non-current assets:             
Inventories, net  Note 13  19,053  - - 
Deferred and recoverable taxes  Note 14  736,367  729,695  Note 14  729,695  1,225,631 
Other assets  Note 15  607,642  569,781  Note 15  569,781  716,300 
   
   
Total non-current assets    1,363,062  1,299,476    1,299,476  1,941,931 
      
Permanent assets:             
Investments  Note 16  175,417  66,993  Note 16  66,993  59,911 
Property, plant and equipment, net  Note 17  9,567,243  9,370,091  Note 17  9,370,091  8,687,607 
Intangibles  Note 18  531,556  863,929  Note 18  863,929  649,949 
   
   
Total permanent assets    10,274,216  10,301,014    10,301,014  9,397,467 
      
Total assets    15,622,803  17,402,504    17,402,504  16,728,089 
      
Current liabilities:             
Payroll and related accruals  Note 19  61,550  73,238  Note 19  73,238  78,214 
Accounts payable and accrued expenses  Note 20  987,403  1,883,699  Note 20  1,883,699  1,941,231 
Taxes other than income taxes  Note 21  439,215  750,759  Note 21  750,759  776,527 
Dividends and employees’ profit sharing  Note 22  296,248  472,071  Note 22  472,071  441,024 
Income taxes  Note 9  61,829  47,964  Note 9  47,964  199,127 
Loans and financing  Note 23  1,591,797  705,345  Note 23  705,345  962,516 
Loans and financing - controlling shareholder  Note 23  398,477  397,788  Note 23  397,788  526,868 
Provisions for contingencies  Note 24  48,509  327,643  Note 24  327,643  336,643 
Provision for pensions  Note 25  28,022  29,497  Note 25  29,497  45,495 
Other liabilities    83,921  120,706    120,706  172,654 
      
Total current liabilities    3,996,971  4,808,710    4,808,710  5,480,299 
      
Non-Current liabilities:             
Income taxes  Note 9  106,523  35,206  Note 9  35,206  9,413 
Taxes other than income taxes  Note 21  583,194  604,942  Note 21  604,942  560,076 
Loans and financing  Note 23  1,655,028  3,592,164  Note 23  3,592,164  3,367,331 
Loans and financing - controlling shareholder  Note 23  990,535  586,201  Note 23  586,201  51,510 
Provisions for contingencies  Note 24  650,236  411,202  Note 24  411,202  667,716 
Provision for pensions  Note 25  478,068  471,949  Note 25  471,949  682,594 
Other liabilities    321,279  380,488    380,488  395,891 
      
Total non-current liabilities    4,784,863  6,082,152    6,082,152  5,734,531 
      
   
Minority interest    30,277  16,652 
      
Minority interest     30,277 
   
Shareholders’ equity:             
Share capital    4,955,254  4,983,402    4,983,402  5,017,945 
Capital reserves    2,337,916  2,310,218    2,310,218  2,275,675 
Income reserves    379,929  394,357    394,357  394,357 
Retained earnings (accumulated losses)    (756,489)  (1,114,162)    (1,114,162) (2,036,648)
Treasury shares    (75,648)  (92,450)    (92,450) (154,722)
      
Total shareholders’ equity  Note 26  6,840,962  6,481,365  Note 26  6,481,365  5,496,607 
   
   
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity    15,622,803  17,402,504    17,402,504  16,728,089 
      


See the accompanying notes to the financial statements.



F - 4


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

Years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 20042005
(In thousands of Brazilian reais, except income/(loss) per lot of one thousand shares)

    
   
2002 
2003 
2004 
    
        2003   2004   2005 
            
Net operating revenue  Note 4  7,071,368  7,915,194  9,064,855  Note 4  7,915,194  9,064,855  10,138,684 
Cost of services  Note 5  5,163,861  5,472,142  6,142,645  Note 5  5,472,142  6,142,645  6,525,898 
        
Gross profit    1,907,507  2,443,052  2,922,210    2,443,052  2,922,210  3,612,786 
Operating expenses:                 
Selling expenses    763,375  821,656  1,086,946    821,656  1,086,946  1,656,242 
General and administrative expenses    661,060  847,074  998,592    847,074  998,592  1,264,741 
Other net operating expenses/(income)  Note 6  (118,496)  214,953  61,198 
Other net operating expenses  Note 6  214,953  61,198  626,306 
        
Operating income before net financial expenses    601,568  559,369  775,474    559,369  775,474  65,497 
        
Net financial expenses  Note 7  618,899  844,802  579,514  Note 7  844,802  579,514  596,239 
        
Operating income/(loss)    (17,331)  (285,433)  195,960    (285,433) 195,960  (530,742)
        
Net non-operating expenses  Note 8  64,497  541,691  112,073  Note 8  541,691  112,073  149,024 
Employees’ profit share    41,387  1,076  53,783    1,076  53,783  
        
Income/(loss) before taxes and minority interests    (123,215)  (828,200)  30,104    (828,200) 30,104  (679,766)
        
Income and social contribution taxes benefit  Note 9  111,596  320,751  75,012  Note 9  320,751  75,012  389,066 
        
Income/(loss) before minority interests    (11,619)  (507,449)  105,116    (507,449) 105,116  (290,700)
Minority interests    - -  14  (6,276)    14  (6,276) (12,971)
        
Net income/(loss)    (11,619)  (507,435)  98,840    (507,435) 98,840  (303,671)
        
Shares outstanding at the balance sheet date (thousands)    535,584,460  539,447,369  541,608,463    539,447,369  541,608,463  541,618,899 
        
Income/(loss) per lot of one thousand shares outstanding                 
at the balance sheet date    (0.02)  (0.94)  0.18    (0.94) 0.18  (0.56)
        

See the accompanying notes to the financial statements.

F - 5


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 20042005
(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

 
Income 
 
Reserve 
  Income  
   Reserve  
 
Retained 
      
 
Earnings 
  Retained  
 
Share 
Capital 
Legal 
Treasury 
(Accumulated 
  Earnings  
 
Capital 
Reserves 
Reserve 
Shares 
Losses) 
Total 
 Share  Capital   Legal  Treasury  (Accumulated  
       Capital  Reserves  Reserve  Shares       Losses)  Total 
      
Balances at January 1, 2002  4,878,336  2,405,382  357,923  (60,124)  394,785  7,976,302 
Capital increase:             
Fiscal benefits on amortization of goodwill  39,591  (39,591)  - -  - -  - -  - - 
Donations and subsidies for investments  - -  554  - -  - -  - -  554 
Increase in income tax, due to change in tax rate  - -  5,053  - -  - -  - -  5,053 
Net loss  - -  - -  - -  - -  (11,619)  (11,619) 
Issuance of treasury stock  - -  - -  - -  21,147  (21,147)  - - 
Acquisition of treasury stock  - -  - -  - -  (21,852)  - -  (21,852) 
Transfer to/from reserves  - -  - -  22,006  - -  (22,006)  - - 
Dividends  - -  - -  - -  - -  (324,648)  (324,648) 
            
Balances at December 31, 2002  4,917,927  2,371,398  379,929  (60,829)  15,365  7,623,790 
Balances at January 1, 2003  4,917,927  2,371,398  379,929  (60,829) 15,365  7,623,790 
            
Capital increase:               
Fiscal benefits on amortization of goodwill  37,327  (37,327)  - -  - -  - -  - -  37,327  (37,327)    
Donations and subsidies for investments  - -  3,845  - -  - -  - -  3,845   3,845     3,845 
Net loss  - -  - -  - -  - -  (507,435)  (507,435)      (507,435) (507,435)
Issuance of treasury stock  - -  - -  - -  18,199  (18,199)  - -     18,199  (18,199) 
Acquisition of treasury stock  - -  - -  - -  (33,018)  - -  (33,018)     (33,018)  (33,018)
Consolidation adjustments - others  - -  - -  - -  - -  (20)  (20)      (20) (20)
Dividends  - -  - -  - -  - -  (246,200)  (246,200)      (246,200) (246,200)
            
Balances at December 31, 2003  4,955,254  2,337,916  379,929  (75,648)  (756,489)  6,840,962  4,955,254  2,337,916  379,929  (75,648) (756,489) 6,840,962 
            
Capital increase:               
Fiscal benefits on amortization of goodwill  28,148  (28,148)  - -  - -  - -  - -  28,148  (28,148)    
Donations and subsidies for investments  - -  450  - -  - -  - -  450   450     450 
Forfeiture of unclaimed dividends  - -  - -  - -  - -  11,569  11,569      11,569  11,569 
Net income  - -  - -  - -  - -  98,840  98,840      98,840  98,840 
Issuance of treasury stock  - -  - -  - -  20,748  (20,748)  - -     20,748  (20,748) 
Acquisition of treasury stock  - -  - -  - -  (37,550)  - -  (37,550)     (37,550)  (37,550)
Consolidation adjustments - others  - -  - -  - -  - -  11,594  11,594      11,594  11,594 
Transfer to/from reserves  - -  - -  14,428  - -  (14,428)  - -    14,428  -�� (14,428) 
Dividends  - -  - -    - -  (444,500)  (444,500)     (444,500) (444,500)
            
Balances at December 31, 2004  4,983,402  2,310,218  394,357  (92,450)  (1,114,162)  6,481,365  4,983,402  2,310,218  394,357  (92,450) (1,114,162) 6,481,365 
            
Capital increase:   
Fiscal benefits on amortization of goodwill  34,543  (34,543)    
Forfeiture of unclaimed dividends      7,685  7,685 
Net loss      (303,671) (303,671)
Acquisition of treasury stock     (62,272)  (62,272)
Dividends     (626,500) (626,500)
      
Balances at December 31, 2005  5,017,945  2,275,675  394,357  (154,722) (2,036,648) 5,496,607 
      

See the accompanying notes to the financial statements.

F - 6


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

Years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 20042005
(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

      
 
2002 
2003 
2004 
 2003  2004  2005 
      
Operating Activities             
Net income/(loss)  (11,619)  (507,435)  98,840  (507,435) 98,840  (303,671)
Adjustments to reconcile net income/(loss) to net cash provided by         
operating activities:         
Depreciation and amortization  2,847,176  2,851,358  2,809,976  2,851,358  2,809,976  2,685,069 
Foreign exchange losses  102,385  31,927  4,711  31,927  4,711  12,971 
Minority share of net income/(loss)  - -  (14)  6,276  (14) 6,276  92,610 
Loss/(gain) on permanent asset disposals  (28,733)  466,864  77,052 
Loss on permanent asset disposals  466,864  77,052  88,895 
Other provisions  (2,580)  (8,259)  60,445  (8,259) 60,445  103,297 
Increase in provisions for contingencies  10,746  309,450  2,301  309,450  2,301  265,514 
Increase/(decrease) in provision for pensions  11,096  4,250  (4,644)  4,250  (4,644) 226,643 
Increase in allowance for doubtful accounts  10,203  29,223  58,682  29,223  58,682  118,266 
Net decrease in income tax, due to change in rate  5,053  - -  - -    
Increase in trade accounts receivable, gross  (322,117)  (336,773)  (269,836)  (336,773) (269,836) (159,500)
(Increase)/decrease in other current assets  25,946  59,035  (378,910)  59,035  (378,910) 173,677 
(Increase)/decrease in other non-current assets  (164,412)  (127,224)  57,880  (127,224) 57,880  (144,768)
Increase/(decrease) in payroll and related accruals  (47,650)  16,033  3,343  16,033  3,343  4,976 
Increase/(decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expenses  (296,846)  (64,261)  832,833  (64,261) 832,833  57,533 
Increase in taxes other than income taxes  80,224  86,875  304,129  86,875  304,129  25,768 
Increase/(decrease) in other current liabilities  (18,944)  (20,445)  41,799  (20,445) 41,799  55,555 
Increase/(decrease) in accrued interest  3,505  (44,602)  19,888  (44,602) 19,888  (7,130)
Decrease in deferred income taxes  (89,488)  (309,060)  (319,508)  (309,060) (319,508) (885,771)
Increase/(decrease) in other non-current liabilities  191,896  41,004  (81,568)  41,004  (81,568) 15,404 
      
Net cash provided by operating activities  2,305,841  2,477,946  3,323,690  2,477,946  3,323,690  2,425,338 
      
Investing activities:         
Additions to investments  (15,532)  (54,202)  (12,301)  (54,202) (12,301) (71,600)
Cash paid for the acquisition of new companies, net of cash and cash         
equivalents acquired of R$55,790 (R$33,463 in 2003)   (144,516)  (61,389) 
equivalents acquired of R$55,790 in 2004 and R$33,463 in 2003  (144,516) (61,389) 
Additions to property, plant & equipment  (1,633,076)  (1,340,169)  (2,305,729)  (1,340,169) (2,305,729) (1,911,199)
Additions to intangible assets  (191,495)  (123,541)  (374,649)  (123,541) (374,649) (44,341)
Proceeds from asset disposals  24,416  19,063  7,367  19,063  7,367  3,486 
      
Net cash used in investing activities  (1,815,687)  (1,643,365)  (2,746,701)  (1,643,365) (2,746,701) (2,023,654)
��     
Financing activities:         
Loans repaid  (436,993)  (574,021)  (1,826,308)  (574,021) (1,826,308) (958,135)
New loans obtained  1,249,898  84,565  2,427,008  84,565  2,427,008  522,722 
Expansion plan and other contributions paid back  - -  (190)  - -  (190)  
Purchase of treasury shares  (21,852)  (33,018)  (37,554)  (33,018) (37,554) (62,271)
Dividends paid  (189,670)  (269,051)  (208,090)  (269,051) (208,090) (571,727)
      
Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities  601,383  (791,715)  355,056  (791,715) 355,056  (1,069,411)
      
Increase in cash and cash equivalents  1,091,536  42,866  932,045 
Increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  42,866  932,045  (667,727)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period  331,363  1,422,899  1,465,765  1,422,899  1,465,765  2,397,810 
   
   
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period  1,422,899  1,465,765  2,397,810  1,465,765  2,397,810  1,730,083 
      

See the accompanying notes to the financial statements.

F - 7


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

1.a) Operations and background

     Brasil Telecom S.A. (“the Company” and/or BrT) is a concessionaire of the Switched Fixed Telephone Service (“STFC”) and operates in Region II of the General Concessions Plan, covering the Brazilian states of Acre, Rondônia, Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso do Sul, Tocantins, Goiás, Paraná, Santa Catarina, and Rio Grande do Sul and the Federal District, under the terms of concessions granted by the Federal Government. These concessions will expire onNew concession agreements under the modalities of local and long distance services came into force as of January 1, 2006, effective until December 31, 2005 and may be renewed for a further term of 20 years (management of BrT understands that it is likely that these concessions will be renewed). The2025. These new concession contracts contain terms reflectingagreements, which provide for reviews on a five-year basis, in general have a higher intervention level in the management of the businesses and several provisions defending the consumer’s interest, as noticed by the regulation body. The main highlights are: (i) the burden of the concession defined as 2% of the net revenue from taxes, calculated every two years, starting in 2006 fiscal year, whose initial payment incurs on 4/30/07 and then successively until the end of the concession. This calculation method, concerning accrual, corresponds to 1% for each fiscal year; (ii) the definition of new universalization targets, particularly AICE – Special Class Individual Access, of mandatory offer and the Telecommunications Service Centers - PST, with full burden for the Concessionaire; (iii) the possibility of the Regulating Agency to impose mandatory alternative plans; (iv) · the introduction of Regulating Agency’s right to intervene and modify agreements of the concessionaire with third parties; (v) the inclusion of assets of the parent company, subsidiary, affiliated companies and third parties, indispensable to the concession, as reversible assets; (vi) the creation of the Users’ Board in each concession. Additionally, the regulation connected to the new General Plan on Quality and the new General Plan on Universal Service, which refer to: (i) new universalization targets; (ii)concession agreement provides for changes in the local rate measurement criteriacalls tariff system, which change from pulse to minute measurement;in the regular hours, in amounts of the public tariffs and (iii) changes in rate adjustment formulas, including the creation of a telecommunications industry indexreadjustment criteria, which had the individual excursion factor reduced from 9% to 5% and a reduction in chargeable rates for local interconnection rates. The concessions may also be revoked prior to expiration. During the 20-year extension period (as from January 1, 2006), companies will be required to pay, every two years as from 2007, fees equal to 2.0% ofthen defined by a sector index - IST, in which composition the net revenues from the provision of telecommunication services (excluding taxes and social contributions) of the immediately preceding year. In June 2003, the Company presented to Agência Nacional de Telecomunicações (ANATEL), the regulatory authority for the Brazilian telecommunications industry, its unequivocal intention to extend Brasil Telecom’s current concessions. The Company and ANATEL are expected to formally enter into new concession contracts by the end of 2005

highest weight is IPCA. The Company’s business, including the services it may provide and the rates charged, is regulated by ANATEL, pursuant to Law 9,472 of July 16, 1997 and the related regulations, decrees, orders and plans.

     With the fulfillment of the obligations for universal services stated in the General Plan of Universal Service Goals (“PGMU”), forecasted for December 31, 2003, and in accordance with the acts published in the Diário Oficial da União (Official Daily Government Newspaper) on January 19, 2004, the restriction of providing other telecommunications services ceased to exist, allowing the Company, its parent companies, its subsidiaries and associated companies to obtain new telecommunication authorizations. On the same date, ANATEL issued authorizations for the Company to exploit STFC in the following service categories: (i) local and domestic long distance calls in Regions I and III and Sectors 20, 22 and 25 of Region II of the General Concession Plan (“PGO”); and (ii) international long distance calls in Regions I, II and III of PGO. As a result of these authorizations, the Company began to exploit the domestic and international long distance services in the new regions, starting on January 22, 2004. In the case of the local service to be provided in regions I and III, as regulated, the Company had a period of 12 months to begin its operations as from the date of the aforementioned authorization. BrT did not provide this service during 2004 and started to offer it as from January 19, 2005.

     The Company is a subsidiary of Brasil Telecom Participações S.A., incorporated on May 22, 1998 as a result of the privatization of the Telebrás System.

     The Company is registered at the Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commission (“CVM”) and at U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Its shares are traded on the

F - 8


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

     São Paulo Stock Exchange (“BOVESPA”), where it also integrates level 1 of Corporate Governance, and trades its American Depositary Receipts - ADRs on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”).

b) Subsidiaries

  • 14 Brasil Telecom Celular S.A. (“BrT Celular”):is a wholly owned subsidiary formed in December 2002 to operate the Personal Communication Service (PCS), holding a license to serve the same coverage area where the Company operates STFC, over the following 15 years. BrT Cel was a pre-operational entity until the last quarter of 2004, when it effectively started its operational activities.
  • BrT Serviços de Internet S.A. (“BrTI”):is a wholly owned subsidiary formed in October 2001, engaged in the provision of internet services and related activities. It started its activities in 2002. During the second quarter of 2003, BrTI invested, as shareholder or quotaholder, and started to have control of the following companies:

(i) Group BrT Cabos Submarinos Group (formerly known as GlobeNet Group)

This group of companies provides data transmission services through a system of submarine fiber optics cables, with points of connection in the United States, Bermuda Islands, Venezuela and Brazil, allowing the traffic of data through packages of integrated services, offered to local and international corporate customers. It is comprised by the following companies:

  • Brasil Telecom Cabos Submarinos do Brasil (Holding) Ltda. (“BrT CSH”): company acquired on June 11, 2003, as part of the purchasing program of the GlobeNet Group.

  • Brasil Telecom Cabos Submarinos do Brasil Ltda. (“BrT CS Ltda.”): company acquired on June 11, 2003, in which BrTI has direct control and the full control jointly with BrT CSH, being also part of the purchasing program of the GlobeNet Group.

  • Brasil Telecom Subsea Cable Systems (Bermuda) Ltd. (“BrT SCS Bermuda”): company incorporated under the laws of the Bermudas, for which the transfer of resources by BrTI for payment of subscribed capital occurred on May 30, 2003. It is also partIn November 2004, the investment of BrTI became a minority interest, when the Brasil Telecom S.A paid investments and started holding the control of the purchasing programcable company. The interest of the GlobeNet Group.Brasil Telecom S.A is 74,16% of total shares as of December 31, 2005. BrT SCS Bermuda holds the total shares of Brazil Telecom of America Inc. and of Brasil Telecom de Venezuela S.A.

No-significant goodwill was generated as a result of this acquisition.

In November 2004, BrT made some capital increases in BrT SCS Bermuda, becoming its parent company, with 74.16% of its ordinary and total share capital.

iG Group

BrT SCS Bermuda acquired on November 24, 2004 the controlling interest of Internet Group (Cayman) Limited (“iG Cayman”), with an interest of 63.2% of total shares as of December 31, 2004, a company incorporated under the laws of Cayman Islands. iG Cayman is a holding company which ownsOn July 26, 2005, BrT SCS Bermuda complemented the controlling interestacquisition of Internet Group do Brasil Ltda. (“iG Brazil”) and Central de Serviços Internet Ltda., both incorporated in Brazil.


F - 9


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

additional 25.6% of IG Cayman’s total shares. On the year closing date, the interest held by BrT SCS Bermuda was 88.8%. IG Cayman is a holding which, in its turn, have control of Internet Group do Brasil Ltda. (“IG Brasil”) and Central de Serviços Internet Ltda. (“CSI”), both established in Brazil.
The iG Group started its activities in January 2000 and its operations are based mainly on providing dial up access to the internet. Additionally, the Group also provides internet services to mobile phones, broad band access, hosting and other services related to e-commerce.

(ii) iBest Group

iBest Group concentrates its operations on providing dialed access to the Internet, sales of bannersadvertising space for divulgation in its portal and value added services, such as acceleratedwith the availability of its Internet access toaccelerator.

BrTI acquired the web.

Since February 2002, BrTI has held a minority interestiBest Group in June 2003, which is composed of the following companies: iBest Holding Corporation, (“IHC”), a company incorporated in the Cayman Islands. Due to a succession of various corporate acts occurring during June 2003 in IHCIslands, and its subsidiaries, BrTI began to exercise control over the iBest Group, which is formed by the main following companies: (i) iBest Holding Corporation; (ii) iBest S.A.; (iii) Febraio S.A.; and (iv) Freelance S.A., established in Brazil. The acquisition of iBest generated goodwill which is mentioned in Note 18.

In May 2004, through a corporate reorganization process, Freelance fully incorporated Febraio SA., iBest S.A. and its subsidiary Mail BR Comunicação Ltda. As a result, Freelance S.A. became the owner of iBest’s trademark and the main company of this Group.

  • MTH Ventures do Brasil Ltda. (“MTH”): On May 13, 2004, the Company acquired 80.1% of the voting capital of MTH, in addition to the 19.9% held previously. MTH, in turn, held 100% of the capital of Brasil Telecom Comunicação Multimídia Ltda. (“BrT Multimídia”), formerly named MetroRED Telecomunicações Ltda. (“MetroRED”).Ltda..

    MetroRED
    BrT Multimídia is a service provider for a private telecommunications network through optical fiber digital networks, and operates in São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro and Belo Horizonte and has a long distance network connecting these major metropolitan commercial centers. It also has an Internet Solution Center in São Paulo, which offers co-location, hosting and other value added services.
  • VANT Telecomunicações S.A. (“VANT”): On May 13, 2004, the Company acquired the remaining 80.1% of the capital of VANT (in addition to the 19.9% held previously), whichVANT. Vant is a service provider for corporate network services founded in October 1999.

    Initially focused on a TCP/IP network, VANT started in Brazil with a network 100% based on this technology. VANTwhich operates throughout Brazil, and is present in the main Brazilian state capitals, offering a portfolio of voice and data products.
  • Other service provider entities: The Company acquired at the end of 2004 the entities Santa Bárbara dos Pampas S.A., Santa Bárbara dos Pinhais S.A., Santa Bárbara do Cerrado S.A. and Santa Bárbara do Pantanal S.A. These entities, which were non-operational at the balance sheet date, have the purpose of providing general services, such as asset and real estate management.

F - 10


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

c) Change in the Management

On July 27, 2005, the Extraordinary Shareholders’ Meeting dismissed from office the members of the Company’s Board of Directors connected with former manager Opportunity. At Board of Directors Meeting held on August, 25, 2005, a new Board of Executive Officers was elected, being the Chief Network Officer maintained in his position.

At the Extraordinary Shareholders’ Meeting held on September 30, 2005, the Board of Directors members of the Company were dismissed from office and new members were elected. On the same date, the Board of Directors meeting resolved to dismiss the Chairman and to elect new members for the Board of Executive Officers, and the Network Officer was reelected. Such resolutions were ratified by the Board of Directors of the Company in meeting held on October 5, 2005.

The process to change the management of Brasil Telecom Participações S.A. and the Company was litigious, according to various material facts published by the Company during 2005 and various lawsuits brought by the former manager, aiming at recovering the management of the Companies, which are still under progress.

d) Agreements as of April 28, 2005 under the Previous Management

On April 28, 2005, still under previous management, Brasil Telecom Participações S.A. and Brasil Telecom S.A. entered into various agreements involving the Opportunity Group and Telecom Italia (“April 28 Agreements”).

Among such agreements, Brasil Telecom S.A. and its subsidiary 14 Brasil Telecom Celular S.A. (“BTC”) executed with TIM International N.V. (“TIMI”) and TIM Brasil Serviços e Participações S.A. (“TIMB”) an instrument named as “Merger Agreement” and a “Protocol” related thereto.

As mentioned in material facts published, the merger was forbidden by injunctions issued by the Brazilian and U.S. courts. It is also subject-matter of discussion under arbitration involving the controlling shareholders.

The new management of Brasil Telecom Participações S.A. and Brasil Telecom S.A. understands that the Merger Agreement, the respective Protocol, and other April 28 agreements, which included the waiver and transaction in lawsuits involving the Companies, were entered into with conflict of interests, breaching the laws and the Bylaws of the Companies, and also, in opposition to shareholders’ agreements and without the necessary corporate approvals. In addition, the new management deems that such agreements are contrary to the best interest of the Companies, especially regarding its mobile telephony business.

2. Presentation of the consolidated financial statements

a.Indexation of the consolidated financial statements

     Partially as a result of past high levels of inflation in Brazil, two methods of inflation accounting evolved: the “Brazilian GAAP” and the “Brazilian Corporation Law” methods. Financial statements prepared under Corporation Law are required for virtually all Brazilian

F - 11


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

entities, and are the basis for determination of taxable income and dividends payable, while the financial statements prepared under Brazilian GAAP used to be required for information purposes by the Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commission (CVM) until 1996, after which their disclosure became optional.

     The most important difference between these methods, which has an effect on the financial statements of subsequent periods, is the date of cessation of the recognition of inflationary adjustments in the carrying values of permanent assets. This was December 31, 2000 under Brazilian GAAP and December 31, 1995 under Brazilian Corporation Law.

     The consolidated financial statements of the Company were prepared on a fully indexed basis to recognize the effects of changes in the purchasing power of the Brazilian currency until December 31, 2000, under the methodology known as Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in Brazil (Brazilian GAAP).

b.Previously published financial information

     The presentation of the consolidated financial statements under Brazilian GAAP is consistent with the presentation of the published financial statements under Brazilian Corporation Law of the Companies, from which the accompanying financial information was extracted, except for certain adjustments mainly related to effects of indexation applied on shareholders’ equity and net income/(loss), detailed in the tables below, and certain reclassifications within the balance sheets and the statements of operations.

     The tables below present a reconciliation of net income/(loss) for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 20042005 and shareholders’ equity at those dates in accordance with Brazilian Corporation Law to net income/(loss) and shareholders’ equity reported herein, under Brazilian GAAP:

 Year ended December 31,  Year ended December 31, 
  
Net income/(loss):  2002  2003  2004  2003  2004 
     
Net income/(loss) in accordance with Brazilian Corporation Law  440,117 (25,297) 276,964  (25,297) 276,964 
Effect of the indexation of non-monetary assets through    
December 31, 2000 (mainly an increased depreciation charge)  (674,760) (744,869) (296,804)  (744,869) (296,804)
Effect of deferred taxation of the above adjustments  223,024 262,731 118,680  262,731  118,680 
  
Net income / (loss) as reported herein  (11,619) (507,435) 98,840  (507,435) 98,840 
     
 As of December 31, 
  
Shareholders’ equity:  2002  2003  2004 
   
Shareholders’ equity in accordance with Brazilian Corporation Law  6,963,535  6,662,844  6,481,365 
Effect of the indexation of non-monetary assets through       
December 31, 2000  1,041,669  296,802  - - 
Effect on deferred taxation on the above adjustment  (381,414)  (118,684)  - - 
   
Shareholders’ equity as reported herein  7,623,790  6,840,962  6,481,365 
   

  As of December 31, 
  
Shareholders’ equity:  2003  2004 
   
Shareholders’ equity in accordance with Brazilian Corporation Law  6,662,844  6,481,365 
Effect of the indexation of non-monetary assets through     
     December 31, 2000  296,802  
Effect on deferred taxation on the above adjustment  (118,684) 
   
Shareholders’ equity as reported herein  6,840,962  6,481,365 
   

F - 1112


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

     All assets subject to the indexation described above were totally depreciated until December 31, 2004. Thus, there is no remaining effect in net income/(loss) or shareholders’ equity originated from the indexation relating to changes in the purchasing power of the Brazilian currency until December 31, 2000.

c.Principles of consolidation

     These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Companies mentioned in Note 1 to these financial statements. All material intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

     Certain prior year amounts were reclassified to conform to the current year’s presentation.

d.US GAAP consideration

     The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been translated and adapted from those originally issued in Brazil, based on the Brazilian Corporation Law and reconciled to Brazilian GAAP, as mentioned above. Certain reclassifications and changes in terminology have been made and these notes have been expanded, in order to conform more closely to reporting practices prevailing pursuant to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”).

     Brazilian GAAP differs in certain significant respects from U.S. GAAP. For more information about the differences between Brazilian GAAP and U.S. GAAP and a reconciliation of our net income and shareholders’ equity from Brazilian GAAP to U.S. GAAP, please see Note 33.

e.Consolidated statements of cash flows

     These consolidated financial statements include consolidated statements of cash flows, which better reflect the source and use of funds in order to provide more significant information, instead of the statements of sources and uses of funds, which are usually disclosed in accordance with Brazilian GAAP.

f.Segment reporting

     The Company, is presenting, the Report by Business Segment (33.c)(34.c). A segment is a distinguishable component of the Company that is engaged in providing products or services, which are subject to risks and rewards that are different from those of other segments.

3. Summary of principal accounting practices

a.Cash and cash equivalents

Cash equivalents are considered to be all highly liquid temporary cash investments with original maturity dates of three months or less. They are recorded at original cost, plus income earned to the balance sheet date and do not exceed market value. Investment funds quotas are appreciated considering the quota values on December 31, 2005.

     Temporary cash investments consist of highly liquid investment funds held by financial institutions and are recorded as trading securities, with unrealized gains and losses included in the statement of operations. The recorded amounts refer to the fair values at each balance sheet date.

F - 1213


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

b.Trade accounts receivable

     Accounts receivable from telephone subscribers are calculated at the tariff rate on the date the service was rendered. Customer accounts receivable also include services provided to customers to the balance sheet date but not yet billed and the related taxes, accounted for on the accrual basis. Receivables from the sale of mobile phones and accessories are recorded at the original amount of sales, when these goods are delivered and accepted by the customers. Interest on overdue accounts receivable from customers is recorded when received, not affecting trade accounts receivable.

c.Allowance for doubtful accounts

     An allowance for doubtful accounts is recorded for accounts receivable for which recoverability is considered doubtful. The criteria adopted for making the provision for doubtful accounts takes into account the calculation of the actual percentage losses incurred on each range of maturity for accounts receivable. The historic percentages are applied to the current ranges of accounts receivable, also including accounts not yet due and the unbilled portion, thus comprising the amount that could become a future loss, which is recorded as a provision. Customers accounts receivable over 180 days due, are written-off from the balance sheet.

d.Foreign currency transactions

     Transactions in foreign currency are recorded at the exchange rate at the time of the related transactions. Foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities are translated using the exchange rate at the balance sheet date. Exchange rate variations are recognized in the statements of operations as they occur.

e.Inventories

     Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Cost of inventories is determined on a weighted average cost basis. Inventories are separated into network expansion, maintenance inventories and mobile phones and accessories for resale. Inventories for use in network expansion are classified as “Construction-in-progress” under “Property, plant and equipment”. Maintenance inventories are classified as other current and long term assets, in accordance with the period in which they be used, and the resale inventories are classified as current assets. Obsolete items are provided for through an allowance for losses. In the case of mobile phones and accessories, this provision is calculated based on the difference of average cost in relation to the sales market value (when the latter is lower).

f.Investments

     Consist principally of investments with less than a 20% ownership stake, including fiscal incentive investments, recorded at indexed cost through December 31, 2000, less a reserve for losses when considered necessary.

g.Property, plant and equipment

     Property, plant and equipment are stated at indexed cost through December 31, 2000, less accumulated depreciation. Financial charges related to loans specifically used to finance assets and construction in progress are capitalized.

F - 1314


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

     Improvements to existing property are capitalized while maintenance and repair costs are charged to expense as incurred. Materials allocated to specific projects are added to construction-in-progress.

     Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives of the underlying assets and in accordance with tax rules. The principal depreciation rates are shown in Note 17.c.

     The Company’s management reviews property, plant and equipment for possible impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset or group of assets may not be recoverable on the basis of undiscounted future cash flows. These reviews have not indicated the need to recognize any impairment losses during the yearsyear ended December 31, 2002 and 2004.2005. Write-down of property, plant and equipment assets is recorded when and if necessary.

h.Intangibles

     Goodwill represents the excess of acquisition costs over book value of net assets of businesses acquired. Goodwill and intangible assets with estimable useful lives are amortized over their respective estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values, and reviewed for impairment when events or circumstances indicates that the carrying amount may not be recoverable.

i.Vacation pay accrual

     Employees’ cumulative vacation pay is accrued as earned.

j.Income and social contribution taxes

     Income and social contribution taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to (a) differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and (b) tax loss carry forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date in relation to all temporary differences, except for the future benefit arising out of the goodwill amortization, where the effect of a change in rates is recognized in capital reserves within shareholders’ equity (note 26.c).

k.Loans and financing

     Loans and financing include accrued interest and monetary or exchange variations to the balance sheet date. Equal restatementThis accounting policy is appliedalso applicable to the guarantee contracts to hedge the debt.

F - 1415


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

l.Provisions for contingencies

     Provisions for contingencies are recognized for the estimated amounts of probable losses based on legal advice and management’s opinion of the outstanding matters at the balance sheet date.date, subject to monetary restatements (interest and/or inflation) when applicable. The basis and nature of the provisions are described in Note 24.

m.Revenue recognition

     Revenues are generally recognized on accrual basis. Revenues from customer calls are based on time used, according to Brazilian law, and are recognized when services are provided (fixed and mobile telephony). Services provided and not billed at the end of each month are estimated and recorded on accrual basis. Considering their high turnover and short average life, revenues from phone cards for public telephones are recorded as the cards are sold. Revenues from sales of mobile phones and accessories are recorded when the goods are delivered and accepted by the subscriber. Revenues from pre-paid mobile services are recognized based on the use of the respective credits. Revenues from activation and installation fees are recognized upon the activation of customer services. A revenue is not accounted for if there is an uncertainty in its realization.

n.Interest income and expenses

     Interest income represents interest earned and gains and losses on temporary cash investments and interest earned on overdue accounts receivable from services. Interest expense represents interest incurred and charges on loans and financing and exchange gains and losses on foreign currency loans and financing.

o.Research and development

     Research and development costs are charged to expense as incurred. Total research and development costs were R$3,761,2,566, R$2,566,430 and R$43073 for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2004,2005, respectively.

p.Pensions and other post-retirement benefits

     Private pension plans and other retirement benefits sponsored by the Company for their employees are managed by Fundação 14, SISTEL and Fundação BrTPrev. Contributions are determined on an actuarial basis, when applicable, and accounted for on an accrual basis. As of December 31, 2001, to comply with CVM Instruction 371/00, Brasil Telecom S.A. recorded the actuarial deficit on the balance sheet date against shareholders’ equity, excluding the corresponding tax effects. As from the beginning of 2002, adjustments to the actuarial deficit provision are being recognized as a period expense.

q.Employees’ profit sharing

     The Company has made a provision for granting employees the right to a share of its profits. The amount, determined to be paid in the year following the recorded provision, is in accordance with the agreement with the union, the Company’s bylaws and the labor agreement.

F - 1516


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

r.Advertising costs

     Advertising costs are expensed as incurred and amounted to R$117,558,85,712, R$85,712,133,576 and R$133,576232,579 during the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2004,2005, respectively.

s.Income/(loss) per share

     Income/(loss) per thousand shares have been calculated based on the number of outstanding shares at the balance sheet date, net of treasury stock.shares.

t.Derivatives

     The Company has entered into derivative transactions to manage partially its exposure in foreign currency exchange rates, basically through currency swap contracts. Gains and losses from swap contracts are recognized monthly on an accrual basis by comparing contractual exchange rates to month end exchange rates, regardless of the contracted settlement terms.

     Management of the Company does not operate with derivatives for trading purposes.

u.Use of estimates

     The preparation of the consolidated financial statements requires management of the Company to make a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reported amount of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the period. Significant items subject to such estimates and assumptions include the carrying amount and recoverability of property, plant and equipment, and intangibles (including the estimates of the level of future revenues and expenses by the reporting units where the goodwill has been allocated subject to impairment analysis under SFAS 142)142 for the purpose described in note 33.o); valuation allowances for receivables, inventories, deferred income tax assets and also provisions for contingencies. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

F - 1617


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

4. Net operating revenue

 
Year ended December 31, 
 Year ended December 31,
  
 
2002 
 
2003
 2004  2003  2004  2005 
      
Local services:             
Monthly charges  2,656,631  2,858,002  3,110,050  2,858,002  3,110,050  3,529,066 
Measured service charges  3,106,544  3,490,010  3,655,450  3,490,010  3,655,450  3,480,161 
Public telephones  341,766  394,525  478,805  394,525  478,805  496,766 
Other  149,643  147,434  126,260  147,434  126,260  96,529 
      
Total  6,254,584  6,899,971  7,370,565  6,899,971  7,370,565  7,602,522 
Long distance services:             
Intraregional  1,748,190  1,923,094  2,393,997  1,923,094  2,393,997  2,626,464 
Interregional and International  594  562  248,909  562  248,909  364,098 
      
Total  1,748,784  1,923,656  2,642,906  1,923,656  2,642,906  2,990,562 
Mobile telephone services:             
Telephony  - -  - -  18,219   18,219  432,977 
Sales of goods  - -  - -  69,685   69,685  299,362 
      
 - -  - -  87,904   87,904  732,339 
Data transmission  504,979  766,196  1,068,779  766,196  1,068,779  1,530,985 
Network services  1,021,308  1,050,821  970,422  1,050,821  970,422  941,464 
Other  310,025  446,737  622,866  446,737  622,866  889,367 
      
Gross operating revenues  9,839,680  11,077,381  12,763,442  11,077,381  12,763,442  14,687,239 
Value added and other taxes on revenues  (2,670,871)  (3,042,487)  (3,579,541)  (3,042,487) (3,579,541) (4,219,054)
Discounts  (97,441)  (119,700)  (119,045)  (119,700) (119,045) (329,501)
      
Net operating revenue  7,071,368  7,915,194  9,064,855  7,915,194  9,064,855  10,138,684 
      

     There are no customers who individually account for more than 5% of gross operating revenues.

5. Cost of services and sales of good

     The costs incurred in the generation of services rendered and goods sold are as follows:

 Year ended December 31,  Year ended December 31, 
  
 2002  2003  2004  2003   2004  2005 
      
Depreciation and amortization  2,635,014  2,535,001  2,498,734  2,535,001  2,498,734  2,278,510 
Personnel  144,581  129,404  120,172  129,404  120,172  160,721 
Mobile handsets and accessories  - -  - -  113,642   113,642  357,680 
Materials  78,759  84,262  66,413  84,262  66,413  73,871 
Services  2,057,838  2,370,454  2,959,656  2,370,454  2,959,656  3,102,827 
Other  247,669  353,021  383,828  353,021  383,828  552,289 
      
 5,163,861  5,472,142  6,142,645  5,472,142  6,142,645  6,525,898 
      

F - 1718


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

6. Other net operating expenses (income)

Following are presented the remaining income and expenses attributed to operational activities:

 Year ended December 31,  Year ended December 31, 
  
 
2002 
 
2003 
 
2004 
 2003   2004   2005 
      
Taxes other than income taxes  22,496  31,869  126,809  31,869  126,809  120,017 
Provision for retirement incentive plan and layoffs (a)  3,295  - -  - - 
Provision for actuarial liabilities of pension fund    8,434  31,132 
Provision for actuarial liabilities of pension fund (b) 8,434  31,132  266,195 
Technical and administrative services  (34,630)  (41,998)  (60,192)  (41,998) (60,192) (53,589)
Provision for contingencies, net of reversal (Note 24)  29,159  359,713  252,200  359,713  252,200  481,456 
Fines and expenses recovered (b)  (95,184)  (114,587)  (182,161) 
Settlement of dispute with Embratel (c)  - -  - -  (124,501) 
Fines and expenses recovered (a) (114,587) (182,161) (149,694)
Settlement of dispute with Telecommunication Companies   (124,501) (63,937)
Infrastructure rentals  (36,146)  (44,033)  (48,384)  (44,033) (48,384) (67,937)
Forfeiture dividends  (6,468)  (10,544)  - -  (10,544)  
Amortization of goodwill on acquisition of investment  - -  631  61,039  631  61,039  94,458 
Other  (1,018)  25,468  5,256  25,468  5,256  (663)
      
 (118,496)  214,953  61,198  214,953  61,198  626,306 
      

(a) The provisions for the retirement incentive plan and layoff expenses related primarily to the following termination plan:

Plans  
Period covered 
 
Number of employees 
 
Termination costs 
    
Apoio Daqui  Oct 99- Mar 02  6,151  234,450 

     The plan included termination benefits as part of the Company’s overall restructuring plan. The costs at each year-end were provided considering the projected employees for each branch, department and job position.

     (b) Fines and expenses recovered primarily represent penalties collected on past due accounts receivable and recovery of sales taxes of prior periods. The amount of penalties collected on past due accounts receivable amounted to R$67,889,77,738, R$77,73867,286 and R$67,286 80,457 in 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2004,2005, respectively.

     (c) Brasil Telecom concluded negotiations with Empresa Brasileira de Telecomunicações S.A. - Embratel, related(b) The supplement of provision for pension funds is represented by the following events:

     (i) Adoption of new overall mortality table (UP94 + 2), equivalent to commercial disputes, resultingR$ 170,505 recognized in an agreement that establishedDecember 2005; and

     (ii) Review of the payment,pension benefits by Embratel,decease database, regarding the composition of approximatelythe family group and recovery of the purchasing power of the granted benefits, equivalent to R$153,000 (approximately R$28 million were already 83,262, recognized by BrT). Roughly 47% was paid to Brasil Telecom up to December, 2004. The remaining amount will be paid until May 2005, in installments corrected by CDI - Domestic Interbank Rate.September 2005;

7. Net financial expenses

 Year ended December 31,  Year ended December 31, 
  
 2002  2003  
2004 
 2003  2004   2005 
      
Financial income:         
Interest income  (201,632)  (302,563)  (493,298)  (302,563) (493,298) (664,699)
Financial expenses:         
Losses on foreign currency financing and monetary variations  152,788  96,447  212,066  96,447  212,066  438,184 
Interest expense  667,743  1,050,918  860,746  1,050,918  860,746  822,754 
     
 618,899  844,802  579,514  844,802  579,514  596,239 
      

F - 1819


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

8. Net non-operating expenses

 Year ended December 31,  Year ended December 31, 
  
 
2002 
 
2003 
 
2004 
 2003  2004  2005 
      
Losses (gain) on disposal of permanent assets  (28,733)  67,953  (18,205)  67,953  (18,205) 47,122 
Write-off of permanent assets CRT  - -  386,977  - -  386,977   
Losses on investments  - -  - -  51,594   51,594  
Amortization of goodwill on merger of CRT  96,133  96,133  66,590  96,133  66,590  102,716 
Other  (2,903)  (9,372)  12,094 
Other……………….……………….………  (9,372) 12,094  (813)
      
 64,497  541,691  112,073  541,691  112,073  149,025 
      

     The write-off of permanent assets in 2003 results from the identification of certain plant and equipment that will no longer be used in operations due to its obsolescence and/or replacement with more technologically advanced telecommunications equipment based upon the Company’s current capital expenditure and modernization program. The specific plant and equipment written off was identified in an obsolescence study performed by the Company with the support of a specialized third party firm.

     The Company holds a 100% interest in the capital of VANT Telecomunicações S.A., whose negotiation for acquisition of the total shares was proposed at the end of the 2001 fiscal year, when a 19.9% interest in the capital of this company was acquired. On the same occasion the amount equivalent to the remaining capital was deposited in a collateral account as a guarantee for the option to the purchase agreement. The acquisition of the remaining interest was only finalized in May 2004 and the investment amounted to R$51,594. At the time of the purchase, VANT presented a negative equity amounting to R$14,208. The Company recorded in 2004 a provision in the amount of the negative equity of the subsidiary in the non-operating result, as well as the R$51,594 referring to the amount invested.

9. Income and social contribution taxes expenses

     Brazilian income taxes comprise federal income and social contribution taxes. In 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2004,2005, the rate for income tax was 25% and 9% for social contribution tax producing a combined statutory rate of 34%.

     Deferred taxes are provided on temporary differences, which include the effects of indexation adjustments that will not give rise to deductions when the related assets are subsequently depreciated, amortized or disposed of.

     Income and social contribution taxes are booked on an accrual basis, with the temporary differences being deferred. The provisions for income and social contribution taxes recognized in the statements of operations, all of which are Brazilian taxes, are as follows:

 Year ended December 31,  Year ended December 31, 
  
 
2002 
 2003  
2004 
  2003  2004   2005 
      
Social contribution tax  (7,592)  (2,573)  (13,312)  (2,573) (13,312)  (51,977)
Income tax  (53,048)  (23,868)  (59,209)  (23,868) (59,209) (161,743)
Deferred taxes  172,236  347,192  147,533  347,192  147,533  602,785 
      
Total  111,596  320,751  75,012  320,751  75,012  389,066 
      

F - 1920


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

     The following is a reconciliation of the amounts calculated by applying the combined statutory tax rates to the reported income before taxes and the reported income tax:

   Year ended December 31,  Year ended December 31, 
   
   
2002 
 2003  
2004 
  2003  2004     2005 
       
Pre-tax Brazilian income/(loss)    (123,215)  (816,860)  59,503  (816,860) 59,503  (626,674)
Pre-tax foreign income/(loss)    - -  (11,340)  (29,399) 
Pre-tax foreign loss  (11,340) (29,399) (53,092)
       
Income/(loss) before taxes as reported in the accompanying               
consolidated financial statements    (123,215)  (828,200)  30,104  (828,200) 30,104  (679,766)
Combined statutory rate    34%  34%  34%  34%  34%  34% 
Tax benefit/(expense) at the combined statutory rate    41,893  281,588  (10,235)  281,588  (10,235) 231,120 
Permanent additions:               
Goodwill amortization on CRT merger and others    (32,685)  (32,685)  (31,442)  (32,685) (31,442) (55,287)
Exchange variation on equity investments    - -  - -  (9,765)   (9,765) (15,133)
Losses on investments    - -  - -  (17,542)   (17,542) 
Other non-deductible expenses    (6,236)  (9,892)  (17,441)  (9,892) (17,441) (16,384)
Permanent exclusions:               
Non-taxable income    4,193  3,046  9,750  3,046  9,750  10,957 
Other items:               
Interest on shareholders’ equity    110,381  83,708  151,130  83,708  151,130  213,010 
Unrecognized tax loss    - -  (6,125)  (9,996)  (2,269) (833) (18,358)
Difference in foreign tax rates (3,856) (9,163) (6,297)
Recognition of deferred Income Tax on Accumulated Tax Losses Recognition of deferred Income Tax on Accumulated Tax Losses  - -  - -  13,736   13,736  50,330 
Effect of rate changes    (8,076)  - -  - - 
Other, net    2,126  1,111  (3,183)  1,111  (3,183) (4,892)
       
Income and social contribution tax benefit as reported in the Income and social contribution tax benefit as reported in the             
accompanying consolidated financial statements    111,596  320,751  75,012  320,751  75,012  389,066 
       

     In 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2004,2005, the dividends proposed by the Company for payment at the end of the year were characterized as interest on shareholders’ equity. As a result, under Brazilian tax law, the dividends were treated as a deduction for income tax purposes.

     In 2005, the indirect subsidiary IG Brasil accomplished the necessary requirements set forth by CVM Instruction 371/02 and recorded in December deferred tax assets related to Corporate Income Tax (IRPJ) and Social Contribution on Net Income (CSLL) at the amount of R$ 50,330.

The composition of deferred tax assets and liabilities, based on temporary differences, is as follows:

  
December 31, 
  
  
2003 
 
2004 
   
Deferred tax assets:     
Provision for contingencies  236,754  235,126 
Provision for actuarial deficiency- FBrTPrev  172,071  170,492 
Goodwill amortization (see Note 18)  123,378  59,006 
Allowance for doubtful accounts   62,224  82,209 
Tax loss carryforwards 1,390  71,648 
Other  100,590  104,165 
   
Total (see Note 14)  696,407  722,646 
   
 
Deferred tax liabilities:     
 Additional indexation expense from pre-1990  13,597  11,239 
 Effect of full indexation  118,683  - - 
   
Total  132,280  11,239 
   
  December 31, 
  
  2004  2005 
   
Deferred tax assets:     
Provision for contingencies  235,126  333,798 
Provision for actuarial deficiency- FBrTPrev  170,492  247,550 
Goodwill amortization (see Note 18) 59,006  
Allowance for doubtful accounts .......…  82,209  122,694 
Tax loss carryforwards……………………………  71,648  406,5311 
ICMS – 69/88 Agreement  50,761  68,601 
Provisions for COFINS/CPMF Suspended  16,110  13,864 
Collection     
Other  37,294  131,113 
  
____________________

1 Equivalent to tax losses amounting to R$1,195,679 (R$210,729 in 2004), which can be carried forward indefinitely (i.e., no expiration date) against profits of future periods, limited to 30% of current year taxable income

F - 21


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

   
Total (see Note 14) 722,646  1,324,151 
   
 
Deferred tax liabilities:     
 Additional indexation expense from pre-1990  11,239  9,960 
 Effect of full indexation   
   
Total  11,239  9,960 
   

     Deferred tax liabilities on the effects of full indexation relate to the difference between the tax basis of permanent assets, which were not indexed for inflation subsequent to December 31, 1995, and the reporting basis, which includes indexation through December 31, 2000.

F - 20


BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

The composition of tax liabilities is as follows:

 
December 31, 
 December 31, 
  
 
2003 
 
2004 
 2004  2005 
    
 
Federal income tax payable  36,072  71,931  71,931  198,580 
Deferred tax liabilities  132,280  11,239  11,239  9,960 
    
Total  168,352  83,170  83,170  208,540 
    
Current  61,829  47,964  47,964  199,127 
Non-current  106,523  35,206  35,206  9,413 

     The Company has not provided a valuation allowance against the net deferred tax asset as of December 31, 20042005 arising out of temporary differences based upon management’s belief that it is more likely than not that such deferred tax asset will be realized in the future through reversal of the differences and the generation of taxable income by the Company. heThe taxable income, basis for the registration of the deferred tax assets is calculated under Brazilian Corporation Law.

     The periods during which the deferred tax assets are expected to be realized are given below. The realization periods are based on a technical study using forecast future taxable income, generated in financial years when the temporary differences will become deductible expenses for tax purposes. This asset is maintained according to the requirements of CVM Instruction 371/02, based on a technical study, which has been approved by the executive and Board of Directors and examined by the fiscal council.

2005 283,220 
2006 63,751 364,919 
2007 101,059 132,735 
2008 70,451 103,737 
2009 54,209 90,703 
2010 a 2012 55,566 
2013 a 2014 18,426 
2014 and after 75,964 
2010 98,671 
2011 a 2013 358,202 
2014 a 2015 18,583 
2015 and after 156,601 
Total 722,646 1,324,151 
Current 283,220 364,919 
Non-current 439,426 959,232 

     The recoverable amount foreseenexpected after the year 20142015 relates to a provision to cover the actuarial deficit of the FBrTPrevBrTPrev pension plan (see Note 25), the liability for which is being paid over 1716 years, the maximum period established by the Supplementary Pensions Department (SPC)

F - 22


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

(“SPC”). Despite the time limit stipulated by the SPC, based on estimated future taxable income, the Company would be ablepresents conditions to recoverfully offset the deferred tax balance entirely within the next 10taxes in a period lower than ten years if it decidedopts to prepayfully anticipate the FBrTPrev liability that year. Tax creditspayment of the debt. Deferred tax assets on tax losses in the amount of R$161,388129,416 (equivalent to R$380,635 of tax losses) attributed to the Consolidated, were not recorded due tonon-existence of necessary requirements for the lackhistory and/or future forecast of fulfillment of the minimum requirements regarding historical and forecasted taxable income for the direct/indirect subsidiariesin VANT, MetroRED,BrT Multimídia, BrT CSH and BrT CS Ltda, and iG Brazil.Ltda., subsidiaries that the Company holds direct or indirect control. In Brazil, tax losses can be carried forward indefinitely against profits of future periods, however the offset is limited to 30% of current year taxable income.

F - 21


BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

10. Cash flow information

 
Year ended December 31, 
    Year ended December 31, 
  
 
2002 
 
2003 
 
2004 
 2003  2004  2005 
      
Income and social contribution tax paid  36,431  94,888  75,988  94,888  75,988  208,372 
Interest paid  521,619  778,996  602,202  778,996  602,202  555,321 

11. Cash and cash equivalents

 
December 31, 
 December 31, 
  
 2003  2004  2004  2005 
    
Cash   2,053  2,053  5,106 
Bank accounts  150,664  69,260  69,260  57,968 
Temporary cash investments  1,315,096  2,326,497  2,326,497  1,667,009 
    
 1,465,765  2,397,810  2,397,810  1,730,083 
    

     Temporary cashHigh-liquid investments represent amounts invested in exclusive financial investment funds which comprise portfolios managed by financial institutions, and refer toguaranteed in federal bonds with an average yieldprofitability equivalent to interbank deposit rates (DIDI CETIP - CDI)(CDI), in exclusive funds managed by financial Institutions and guaranteed in futures contracts inof dollar traded at the Futures and Commodities Exchange - BM&F, linked to foreign(BM&F), overnight financial investments abroad that earns exchange rate variation andplus interest of around 4% per year4.00% p.a., deposit certificates issued by foreign financial institutions, and in an investment fund in foreign currency, bearing interest from 1%Certificate Deposits (CDBs) issued by first-rate financial institutions with average profitability equivalent to 4.25% per annum.CDIs.

     The liabilitiesCompany will be subject to the partial block of these exclusive funds are limitedits financial investments, at the approximate total amount of R$ 252,014, to management and administrative feesoccur after the publication of its audited financial statements. Such retention is due to the fact that the Company did not reach certain minimum amounts for certain indicators, such as custody, audit,cash generation, indebtedness and other. There are no significant financial liabilities as well as the Company has not used any asset as collateral to cover liabilities that may arise from these exclusive funds. The funds creditors do not have rights over the general credits of the Company.other, established in agreements entered into with financing creditors.

12. Trade accounts receivable, net

The amounts related to accounts receivable are as follows:

  
December 31, 
  
  2003  2004 
   
 
Unbilled amounts  707,130  911,655 
Billed amounts  1,335,606  1,363,406 
Sale of goods  - -  79,699 
   
Subtotal  2,042,736  2,354,760 
 
Allowance for doubtful accounts:  (183,023)  (243.181) 
   Services  (183,023)  (241,022) 
   Sale of goods  - -  (2,159) 
   
  1,859,713  2,111,579 
   

F - 2223


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

     The breakdown of high-liquid investment portfolio is presented below, on the balance sheet closing date:

 Year ended December 31, 2005 
Financial Institution Description of securities 

LTN (swap
coverage) (1)

LFT(2)Overnight NBC-E (3)Over Selic NTN-D (4)
Exclusive Funds       
 ABN Amro 96,143 49,068 1,779 
 Banco do Brasil 34,652 215,783 3,080 
 Bradesco 30,899 12,495 1,372 
 CEF 71,506 27,254 244 8,906 
 Itaú 46,958 39,538 
 Safra 77,457 8,849 3,332 
 Santander 154,269 87,704 26,591 87 18,277 
 Unibanco 56,856 162,052 42 
 Votorantim 140,353 26,702 1,987 
Total of Exclusive Funds 709,093 629,445 244 26,591 20,585 18,277 
Other Investments       
 Safra 222,358 
Total of Other Investments - - 222,358 - - - 
Total High-Liquid Investments 709,093 629,445 222,602 26,591 20,585 18,277 

 Year ended December 31, 2005 
Financial Institution Description of securities Total
Open
I
nvestment
Funds (Fixed
Income)
Bank Deposit
Certificates 
Provision for
Income Tax 
Liabilities
Exclusive Funds      
 ABN Amro (1,074)(33)145,883 
 Banco do Brasil 12 (1,476)(13)252,038 
 Bradesco 100 (164)44,702 
 CEF (811)(19)107,080 
 Itaú (547)(24)85,925 
 Safra (693)(34)88,911 
 Santander (1,842)(23)285,063 
 Unibanco (1,197)(28)217,725 
 Votorantim (764)(18)168,260 
Total of Exclusive Funds 112 - (8,568)(192)1,395,587 
Other Investments      
 Safra 468 222,826 
 Other Institutions 37,884 10,712 48,596 
Total of Other Investments 37,884 11,180 - - 271,422 
Total High-Liquid Investments 37,996 11,180 (8,568)(192)1,667,009 

F - 24


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

 Year ended December 31, 2004 
Financial Institution Description of securities 
LTN (swap
coverage)(1)
LFT(2)Promissory
Notes
TreasuryNBC-E(3)Over
Selic
Exclusive Funds       
ABN Amro 52.789 140.189 23.661 
Banco do Brasil 8.798 302.507 39.674 13 
CEF 174.931 37.277 
Citigroup 147.740 62.433 
Itaú 386.352 
Safra 7.487 23.624 
Santander 232.597 27.352 
SS&C Fund Services N.V. 114.139 24.477 
Unibanco 139.101 189.780 45.385 
Total of Exclusive Funds 348.428 1.496.276 114.139 24.477 67.026 129.974 
Other Investments       
Safra 78.486 
Other Institutions 
Total of Other Investments - - - 78.486 - - 
Total High-Liquid Investments 348.428 1.496.276 114.139 102.963 67.026 129.974 

 Year ended December 31, 2004 
Financial Institution Description of securities 
NTN-D(4)Open Investment
Funds (Fixed
Income)
Bank Deposit
Certificates 
Liabilities Total 
Exclusive Funds      
ABN Amro (37)216.602 
Banco do Brasil (21)350.971 
CEF (6)212.202 
Citigroup (42)210.139 
Itaú (4)386.348 
Safra (2)31.110 
Santander 14.445 (101)274.299 
SS&C Fund Services N.V. 138.617 
Unibanco (48)374.217 
Total of Exclusive Funds 14.445 - - (261)2.194.504 
Other Investments      
Safra 78.487 
Other Institutions 17.237 36.268 53.505 
Total of Other Investments - 17.238 36.268 - 131.992 
Total High-Liquid Investments      
 14.445 17.238 36.268 (261)2.326.496 

(1) LTN - National Treasury Bill
(2) LTF - National Treasury Financial Bill
(3) NBC - Banco Central do Brasil Note
(4) NTN - National Treasury Note

F - 25


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

12. Trade accounts receivable, net

     The amounts related to accounts receivable are as follows:

  December 31, 
  
  2004  2005 
   
 
Unbilled amounts  911,655  961,060 
Billed amounts  1,363,406  1,432,862 
Sale of goods  79,699  120,337 
   
Subtotal  2,354,760  2,514,259 
 
Allowance for doubtful accounts:  (243.181) (361,446)
   Services  (241,022) (353,078)
   Sale of goods  (2,159) (8,368)
   
  2,111,579  2,152,813 
   

     The changes in the allowance for doubtful accounts were as follows:

 Year ended December 31,  Year ended December 31, 
  
 
2002 
 2003  2004  2003  2004  2005 
      
Beginning balance  143,565  153,768  183,023   153,768  183,023  243,181 
Provision charged to selling expense  262,505  297,858  425,741   297,858  425,741  445,229 
Write-offs  (252,302)  (268,603)  (365,583)  (268,603) (365,583) (326,964)
      
Ending balance  153,768  183,023  243,181   183,023  243,181  361,446 
      

13. Inventories

 
December 31, 
 December 31, 
  
 
2003 
 
2004 
 2004  2005 
    
Maintenance inventories  37,704  15,679  15,679  12,497 
Mobile phones and accessories  - -  209,024  209,024  114,340 
Provision for losses - realization value  - -  (43,814)  (43,814) (37,036)
Provision for losses - obsolete items  (10,609)  (6,856)  (6,856) (6,766)
    
 27,095  174,033  174,033  83,035 
    
Current  8,042  174,033 
Non-current  19,053  - - 

F - 26


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

14. Deferred and recoverable taxes

 
December 31, 
 December 31, 
  
 
2003 
 
2004 
 2004  2005 
    
Recoverable social contribution tax  20,998  21,660  21,660  80,114 
Recoverable income tax  80,446  88,812  88,812  343,272 
Deferred tax assets (Note 9)  696,407  722,646  722,646  1,324,151 
Sales and other taxes  439,797  632,277  632,277  600,642 
    
 1,237,648  1,465,395  1,465,395  2,348,179 
    
Current  501,281  735,700  735,700  1,122,548 
Non-current  736,367  729,695  729,695  1,225,631 

     Most of the sales and other taxes is related to the ICMS (value added tax) recoverable which arose from credits recorded on the acquisition of fixed assets, whose compensation with ICMS payable is recorded in 48 equal installments.

F - 23


BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

15. Other assets

 December 31,  December 31, 
  
 2003  
2004 
 2004     2005 
    
Prepayments  36,954  89,865  89,865  90,697 
Accounts receivable from telecommunications companies  103,338  100,330  100,330  8,018 
Accounts receivable from asset disposals and others  5,527  336  336  
Recoverable advances  33,204  66,538  66,538  78,142 
Court deposits  457,977  620,998  620,998  789,736 
Escrow agreements  69,251  34,181  34,181  1,299 
Assets available for sale  9,269  276  276  9,175 
Tax incentives  18,315  14,473  14,473  14,473 
Advance for future paid-in capital  6,965  - - 
Loans and financing assets  10,744  9,173 
Other  17,566  25,676  14,932  15,799 
    
 758,366  952,673  952,673  1,016,512 
    
Current  150,724  382,892  382,892  300,212 
Non-current  607,642  569,781  569,781  716,300 

     The majority of the court deposits relates to the labor and tax cases, with the most significant individual item being the ICMS (State VAT) as mentioned in Note 21.

16. Investments

  
December 31, 
  
  2003  2004 
   
 
Fiscal incentive and other investments  175,417  66,993 
   
 
 
     Investments stated at cost (less reserves when applicable) are represented by interests obtained by converting into shares or capital quotas of tax incentives in regional FINOR/FINAM funds, Law for Incentives for Information Technology Companies and the Audiovisual Law. In 2003, the investments in MTH and Vant (whose controlling interest were acquired in May 2004),  amounting to R$61,463 and R$36,018, respectively, were measured at cost, as they represent less  than 20% ownership. 
         December 31, 
  
  2004  2005 
   
 
Fiscal incentive and other investments     66,993  59,911 
   

17. Property, plant     Investments stated at cost (less reserves when applicable) are represented by interests obtained by converting into shares or capital quotas of tax incentives in regional FINOR/FINAM funds, Law for Incentives for Information Technology Companies and equipment, netthe Audiovisual Law

a.Composition:

  December 31, 
  
  2003  2004 
   
 
Construction-in-progress  493,961  656,698 
Automatic switching equipment  6,533,143  6,612,080 
Transmission and other equipment  15,017,188  15,802,337 
Buildings  5,329,572  5,421,277 
Other assets  2,713,582  3,720,017 
   
Total cost  30,087,446  32,212,409 
Accumulated depreciation  (20,520,203) (22,842,318)
   
Property, plant and equipment, net  9,567,243  9,370,091 
   

F - 2427


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

17. Property, plant and equipment, net

a.Composition:

  December 31, 
  
  2004  2005 
   
 
Construction-in-progress  656,698  636,246 
Automatic switching equipment  6,612,080  6,675,563 
Transmission and other equipment  15,802,337  16,821,119 
Buildings  5,421,277  5,572,414 
Other assets  3,720,017  4,243,276 
   
Total cost  32,212,409  33,948,618 
Accumulated depreciation  (22,842,318) (25,261,011)
   
Property, plant and equipment, net  9,370,091  8,687,607 
   

     Transmission and other equipment include: transmission equipment, aerial, underground and building cables, teleprinters, private automatic exchanges, generating equipment and furniture.

     Other assets include: underground cables, computer equipment, vehicles, land and other assets. Within “Other assets” the book value of land is R$114,485110,151 and R$110,151109,145 at December 31, 20032004 and 2004,2005, respectively.

     According to the STFC concession contracts, the Company assets that are indispensable for providing the service and qualified as “reversible assets” at the time of expiration of the concession will automatically revert to ANATEL, and the Company will be entitled to the right of compensation stipulated in the legislation and the corresponding contracts. The gross cost of reversible assets on December 31, 2005 was R$ 20,475,919, and the residual value on the same date of R$ 4,827,626 (unaudited information)

     Changes in net property plant, and equipment for the year ended December 31, 2003 and 2004 are:

 Year ended December 31,  Year ended December 31, 
  
 2003  2004  2004  2005 
    
Beginning balance  11,260,625  9,567,243  9,567,243  9,504,631 
Merged Property, Plant and Equipment  134,650  237,808  237,808  
Additions  1,408,623  2,634,191  2,634,191  1,968,303 
Disposals  (481,030) (245,123) (245,123) (129,656)
Depreciation  (2,755,625) (2,824,028) (2,824,028) (2,655,671)
    
Ending balance  9,567,243  9,370,091  9,370,091  8,687,607 
    

b.Capitalized interest

     As required in the telecommunication industry at that time, the Company capitalized interest attributable to construction-in-progress, up to December 31, 1998, at the rate of 12% per annum of the balance of construction-in-progress. Starting in 1999, the Company capitalizes interest on loans specifically related to financing of construction in progress, and interest on internal financing is no longer capitalized. The amounts of R$127,979,61,330, R$61,330,9,043 and R$9,043 19,852 were capitalized in 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2004,2005, respectively. Capitalized interest is depreciated over the same period as the associated assets.

F - 28


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

c.Depreciation rates

     The annual depreciation rates applied to property, plant and equipment are as follows:

  % 
  
 
Automatic switching equipment  20.00 
Transmission and other equipment  20.00 
Buildings  4.00 
Other assets (excluding land) average rate  12.2410.06 

F - 25


BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

     In 2004, considering the current technological stage of the telecommunications equipment, the Company, based on technical report issued by the National Institute of Technology - INPI, on January 12, 2004, decided to change the depreciation rates of some equipment, covering underground systems (from 4% to 10%), metallic cables (from 10% to 20%) and network management equipment (from 10% to 20%). This change generated a reduction in net income, net of taxes, in the amount of R$331,136 (R$0.61 per thousand shares).

d.Rentals

     The Company rents equipment, premises, dedicated lines and electrical energy public posts through a number of agreements that expire at different dates. Total annual rent expense under these agreements, which are operating and capital leases, was as follows:

  Year ended December 31 
  
  2002  2003  2004 
    
 
Rent expense  202,219  230,887  266,730 
  Year ended December 31 
  
  2003  2004  2005 
    
 
Rent expense  230,887  386,021  498,340 

     Rental commitments relating to these contracts where the future minimum rental payments under leases with remaining terms in excess of one year that are non-cancelable without payment of a penalty are:

     Year ending December 31, 20042005

2005  8,468 
2006  8,465  14,080 
2007  8,512  13,980 
2008  6,968  11,608 
2009  3,828  1,909 
2010  1,394 
2011 and after  3,451 
  
Total  41,086  41,577 
  

18. Intangiblese.Impairment analysis

  December 31, 
  
  2003  2004 
   
 
Goodwill on merger of CRT (a)  180,266  113,681 
Goodwill on acquisition of iBest (b)  117,216  74,076 
Mobile personal services licenses (c)  228,398  303,176 
Other licenses (d)  - -  11,713 
Goodwill on acquisition of GlobeNet (note 1b.i)  5,676  6,584 
Goodwill on acquisition of MetroRed (e)  - -  95,651 
Goodwill on acquisition of iG (f)  - -  234,302 
Others  - -  24,746 
   
  531,556  863,929 
   

Property, plant, and equipment are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Projections at balance sheet date support the recoverability of these assets based on the expansion of the Company’s operations, and on the maintenance of profitable margins in its various business segments. However, if the Company is not successful in meeting its operational and business targets, it is possible that part or all of the assets of its segments will be impaired in the future.

F - 2629


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

18. Intangibles

  December 31, 
  
  2004  2005 
   
 
Goodwill on merger of CRT (a) 113,681  
Goodwill on acquisition of iBest (b) 74,076  49,102 
Mobile personal services licenses (c) 303,176  307,685 
Other licenses (d) 11,713  11,713 
Goodwill on acquisition of GlobeNet (note 1b.i) 6,584  4,703 
Goodwill on acquisition of BrT Multimídia (e) 95,651  73,578 
Goodwill on acquisition of iG (f) 234,302  203,168 
Others  24,746  
   
  863,929  649,949 
   

     (a) On December 28, 2000, a corporate reorganization resulted in the merger of CRT into the Company with effect from December 1, 2000. The restructuring process included a downstream merger performed in accordance with the requirements of Instructions 319/99 and 320/99 of the CVM with the objective of achieving the deductibility for income tax purposes of amortization of the goodwill. As a consequence, a special goodwill reserve was recorded at the CRT level in shareholders’ equity with the related tax benefit of the future goodwill amortization recorded as a deferred tax asset in the amount of R$321,856 (the remaining balance of this(this tax benefit is shownwas showed in the consolidated balance sheet as part of deferred and recoverable taxes as ofuntil December 31, 2003 and 2004 in the amounts of R$123,378 and R$59,006 respectively - see Note 9). As a result of this corporate reorganization, in Brasil Telecom’s books, goodwill was recomputed reducing its original amount to R$480,691, net of the tax benefit, including the unamortized balance of goodwill recognized in previous acquisitions. The remaining unamortized balance of goodwill is presented in this account.

     (b) In June 2003, as a result of several statutory acts in iBest Holding Corporation - IHC and in its subsidiaries, BrTI acquired the control of iBest Group. The acquisition of iBest generated goodwill of R$117,216, which will be amortized over the upcoming years proportionally to the profits generated by iBest Group.

     (c) Relates to three Personal Communication Service (“PCS”) license contracts signed with ANATEL in 2002 by the wholly-owned subsidiary Brasil Telecom Celular S.A. The cost of these licenses, which guarantee the operation of SMP over the next 15 years in the same operating area where the Company has its fixed telephone concession, amounted to R$191,495, of which 10% was paid upon signing the contract. The balance of R$172,345 corresponding to the remaining 90%, was recognized as a liability of the subsidiary and is payable in sixfive equal and successive annual installments falling due between 20052006 and 2010. During the second quarter of 2004 new authorizations were contracted for certain frequency bands in the total amount of R$28,624. The rights to explore them are similar to those applicable to the previous authorizations, and the maturities of the installments of these new authorizations are foreseen for 2007 to 2012. The outstanding balance is subject to price-level restatement based on the variation of the IGP-DI index plus interest of 1% per month. On December 31, 2004,2005, the restated liability was R$295,300 (R$294,404 (R$211,847 in 2003)2004) and is presented under the caption other liabilities, in non-current liabilities.

     (d) Other licenses belong to Vant and refer to the authorization to use specific radio-frequency waves in order to explore data transmission. The remaining balance is adjusted by the

F - 30


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

variation of IGP-DI, plus 1% per month, and will be paid in six equal annual installments as from April 2006.

     (e) On May 13, 2004, the Company acquired 80.1% of the voting capital of MTH, in addition to the 19.9% held previously. MTH, in turn, held 100% of the capital of MetroRED.BrT Multimídia. This acquisition generated goodwill of R$110,366, which will be amortized over the upcoming years proportionally to the profits generated by MetroRED.

F - 27


BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)BrT Multimídia.

     (f)BrT SCS Bermuda acquired on November 24, 2004 the controlling interest of iG Cayman, with an interest of 63.2% of total shares as of December 31, 2004, a company incorporated under the laws of Cayman Islands. On July 26, 2005, BrT SCS Bermudas complemented a additional acquision of 25,6% of total shares of the iG Cayman. On December 31, 2005, the Company had an interest of 88,8% of total shares of the iG Cayman. iG Cayman is a holding company which owns the controlling interest of iG Brazil and Central de Serviços Internet Ltda., both incorporated in Brazil. The acquisition of iG Group generated goodwill of R$238,274,289,470, which will be amortized over the upcoming years proportionally to the profits generated by iG Group.under Brazilian GAAP in five years.

19. Payroll and related accruals

 December 31,  December 31, 
  
 2003  2004  2004  2005 
    
Salaries and wages  243  4,553  4,553  3,995 
Accrued social security charges  56,496  63,097  63,097  67,836 
Accrued benefits  4,811  5,588  5,588  6,383 
    
 61,550  73,238  73,238  78,214 
    

20. Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 December 31,  December 31, 
  
 2003  2004  2004  2005 
    
Suppliers  945,209  1,787,302  1,787,302  1,786,535 
Third-Party Consignments  42,194  96,397  96,397  154,696 
    
 987,403  1,883,698  1,883,699  1,941,231 
    

21. Taxes other than income taxes

 December 31,  December 31, 
  
 2003  2004  2004  2005 
    
ICMS (Value-added tax)  859,023  1,192,853  1,192,853  1,124,874 
Other taxes on operating revenues  163,386  162,848  162,848  211,729 
    
 1,022,409  1,355,701  1,355,701  1,336,603 
    
Current  439,215  750,759  750,759  776,527 
Non-current  583,194  604,942  604,942  560,076 

     The non-current portion refers to ICMS (State VAT), related to income from other services not directly related to telecommunications as from 1998, which the Company is challenging in court and for which escrow deposits are being made. It also includes the deferred ICMS arising on account of an incentive scheme offered by the government of the State of Paraná, which grants four years postponement without interest charges.

F - 2831


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

     In 2003 the Company paid PIS and COFINS taxes in installments, previously settled through offsetting tax credits, the ratification of which was refused by the Federal Revenue department, at the administrative level, The payment in installments was included in the Program for Tax Recovery (REFIS) and Special Payment in Installments (PAES). From the amount divided into installments through REFIS remains a balance of R$2,871 (R$13,489 in 2003) with the period for amortization established at 3 monthly payments. With respect to PAES, the remaining balance amounts to R$31,224 (R$42,596 (R$43,529 in 2003)2004), payable in 10290 monthly installments. The balances payable for both programs are charged interest at the long-term interest rate (TJLP).

     With respect to the tax credits that were refused, the Company has lodged appeals at the judicial level for restitution or future compensation.

22. Dividends and employees’ profit sharing

 December 31,  December 31, 
  
 2003  2004  2004  2005 
    
Dividends payable to:         
Controlling shareholder  138,062  250,236  250,236  220,708 
Minority shareholders (a)  109,180  160,966  160,966  155,871 
Employees’ profit sharing  49,006  60,839  60,839  64,445 
    
 296,248  472,071  472,071  441,024 
    

     (a) Includes R$37,972 in 2003 and R$33,407 in 2004 ofand R$ 48,139 in 2005of unclaimed dividends from prior years, which will be reversed to retained earnings if not claimed within three years.

23. Loans and financing

 December 31,  December 31, 
  
 2003  2004  2004  2005 
    
Financial institutions (a)  1,886,605  3,205,114  3,205,114  3,007,477 
Loans from Controlling Shareholder (b)  89,012  73,990  73,990  58,378 
Loans from suppliers and others (c)  4,574  29,627  29,627  25,474 
Debentures issued to Controlling Shareholder (d)  1,300,000  910,000  910,000  520,000 
Public debentures (e)  900,000  500,000  500,000  500,000 
Hedge (i)  54,704  126,168  126,168  349,099 
Accrued interest  400,942  436,598  436,598  447,797 
    
 4,635,837  5,281,498  5,281,498  4,908,225 
    
Current  1,990,274  1,103,133  1,103,133  1,489,384 
Non-current  2,645,563  4,178,365  4,178,365  3,418,841 

F - 2932


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

a.Financial institutions

     Financing from financial institutions denominated in local currency, as of December 31, 2004,2005, bore fixed interest of 2.4% to 14% per annum and variable interest based on one of the following reference rates: TJLP (Brazilian long-term interest rates, which was 9.75% per annum at December 31, 2004)2005) plus 3.85% to 6.5% per annum, UMBNDES (National Bank for Economic and Social Development currency, which was -7.4%–14.0% per annum at December 31, 2004)2005) plus 3.85% to 6.5% per annum, 100% of CDI (Interbank Deposit rate, which was 17.46%18.15% per annum at December 31, 2004)2005), CDI + 1.0% and IGP-M (General Market Price Index, which was 12.41%1.21% per annum at December 31, 2004)2005) plus 12% per annum. In 20042005 this resulted in an average rate of 15.6%15.1% per annum.

     Financing denominated in foreign currency bears a fixed interest rate of 0% to 9.38% per annum, a variable interest rate of LIBOR plus 0.5% to 4.0% per annum and YEN LIBOR plus 1.92% to 3.35%, resulting in an average rate of 2.31%2.4% per annum. The LIBOR and YEN LIBOR rate for semi-annual payments was 2.83%4.70% and 0.0625%0.06939% per annum on December 31, 2004,2005, respectively.

b.Loans from Controlling Shareholder

     Loans from the Controlling Shareholder are denominated in U.S. dollars and in Brazilian reais. Amounts denominated in U.S. dollars are repayable in monthly installments up to 20142015 and with a variable interest rate equal to the rate of appreciation of the U.S. dollar versus the Brazilian real on an annual basis plus 1.75% per annum. Amounts denominated in Brazilian reais bear local short-term market interest rates.

c.Loans from suppliers and others

     The main part accounted for as loans from suppliers and others, amounting R$26,411,23,290, is related to a debt due by Vant to the former parent company. This liability will due on December 31, 2015, bearing US dollar exchange variation. Loans from suppliers of telecommunication equipment denominated in U.S. dollars bearwith variable interest at either a fixedrate equal to the rate of 1.75% per annum or a variable rateappreciation of LIBOR plus 2.95% per annum.the U.S. dollar versus the Brazilian real .

d.Debentures issued to Controlling Shareholder

     On January 27, 2001, the Company offered up to 1,300 debentures to the Controlling Shareholder in a private placement. These non-convertible debentures were issued at R$1,000 each, and totaled R$1,300,000. They were issued for the purpose of financing part of the investment program. The Controlling Shareholder subscribed all the debentures in 2001.

     The outstanding balance of the debentures will be amortized in two installments,an installment, corresponding to 30% and 40% of face value, maturing on 07/27/2005 and 07/27/2006, respectively.2006. The debentures pay 100% of CDI (Interbank deposit rates), payable semiannually.

e.Public debentures

First public issue: 50,000 non-convertible debentures of R$10, totaling R$500,000, issued on May 1, 2002. The term is for two years maturing on May 1, 2004. Interest of 109% of the CDI is payable half-yearly on November 1 and May 1 from the date of issue to the maturity of the debentures.

F - 30


BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

Second Public Issue: 40,000 non-convertible debentures of R$10, totaling R$400,000, issued on December 1, 2002. The term is for two years maturing on December 1, 2004. Interest of 109% of the CDI is payable half-yearly on June 1 and December 1 from the date of issue to the maturity of the debentures.

     Third Public Issue: 50,000 non-convertible debentures without renegotiation clause, with a unit face value of R$10, totaling R$500,000, issued on July 5, 2004. The maturity period is five years, coming due on July 5, 2009. Yield corresponds to an interest rate of 100% of the CDI plus 1% p.a., payable half-yearly.

F - 33


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

     As of December 31, 2004,2005, no debentures issued by the Company had been repurchased.

f.Repayment schedule

     Non-current debt is scheduled to be paid as follows:

   2004 
   2005 
 
2006    1,238,379 
2007    788,959  927,173 
2008    385,837  510,736 
2009    793,960  914,024 
2010    290,973  409,718 
2011 and after    680,257 
2011  128,431 
2012 and after  528,759 
   
   4,178,365  3,418,841 
   

g.Interest Rate and Currency analysis

     Total debt is denominated in the following currencies:

 Exchange rate at December 31, 2003 and 2004 
(Units of one Brazilian real) 
     Exchange rate at     
 December 31,  December 31, 2004 and 2005  December 31, 
   
 2003  2004  (Units of one Brazilian real) 2004  2005 
      
Floating Rate Debt:  2.8892 and 2.6544, respectively
  0.025935 
          
Brazilian reais  4,324,913  3,818,489    3,818,489  3,465,196 
U.S. dollars  143,877  100,660  2.6544 and 2.3370, respectively  100,660  61,967 
Yens  - -  562,927  0.025935and 0,019833,respectively  562,927  430,418 
      
   4,468,790  4,482,076    4,482,076  3,957,581 
      
Fixed Rate Debt:  2.8892 and 2.6544, respectively
  0.025935 
          
Brazilian reais  20,439  16,007    16,007  29,841 
U.S. dollars  91,906  654,676  2.6544 and 2.3370, respectively  654,676  570,175 
Yens  - -  2,571  0.025935 and 0,019833,respectively  2,571  1,529 
      
   112,345  673,254    673,254  601,545 
      
Hedge Adjustments    54,704  126,168    126,168  349,099 
   
   
Total    4,635,837  5,281,498    5,281,498  4,908,225 
      

h.Covenants and guarantees

     The agreements that govern our debt, including our credit facilities with National Bank for Social and Economic Development (Banco Nacional de Desenvolvimento Econômico e Social – “BNDES”), contain a number of significant covenants, the failure to comply with which could adversely impact our business. In particular, the terms of these agreements restrict our ability, and the ability of our subsidiaries, to incur additional debt, make capital expenditures, grant liens, pledge assets, sell or dispose of assets and make certain acquisitions, mergers and consolidations. Furthermore, in accordance with a number of our debt agreements, including our credit facilities with BNDES, we are required to comply with these covenants and maintain certain specified financial ratios in order to maintain the current maturity dates for these debt agreements. As a general rule, the occurrence of an event of default under a credit facility with BNDES may trigger the acceleration of other agreements representing our indebtedness.

F - 3134


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

h.Covenants and guarantees

     Some     During December 2004, we initiated a process of adjusting the loans and financing contracts signed by the Companycovenants related to certain agreements with its creditors contain covenants that stipulate the advance payment of themBNDES, in cases where minimum values for certain indicators are not achieved, such as indebtedness, liquidity, cash generation and others. The indicators required in these clauses, which are common in loan and financing transactions, were fully achieved by the Company.

     In order to adjust valuation parametersfit them to the new reality of the telecom segmenttelecommunications sector and our company. As part of this adjustment process, we and BNDES introduced a new mechanism in the credit facility agreements. In the event of a failure by us to comply with semi-annual financial covenants, instead of the Company,right to accelerate the entire amount of the debt, which may trigger cross-defaults in our debt instruments, BNDES may request the retention of funds in a renegotiationblocked account in an amount equivalent to three times the highest installment of principal plus interest due under such agreement. If we, after the creation of such a blocked account, we again fail to comply with the BNDES’ agents (private banks) took place duringfinancial covenants, then BNDES will have the right, but not the obligation, to declare the acceleration of the debt. The adjustment process extended these remedies to all BNDES agreements to which we are a party, effective as of December 31, 2004. These agents approvedAny failure by us to comply with the newfinancial covenants of our debt instruments, and subsequent acceleration of our debt by BNDES, would have a material adverse effect on our ability to conduct our operations.

     On January 5, 2006, we announced that we intended to book provisions in our financial statements for the year ended December 20, 2004, with retrospective application to31, 2005, in the whole year-endedamount of R$622 million (see description in PART II of this report in our Financial Statements). Such provisions, if booked, could affect our results and, accordingly, jeopardize the compliance in the fiscal year ended on December 31, 2004,2005 until and submitted their acceptanceincluding the third quarter of 2006 of financial covenants set forth in certain debt agreements, including the credit facilities with BNDES, the “Escritura de Emissão”. relating to the Debentures of the 4th issuance, being the 3rd public, the loan agreements entered into with Japan Bank of International Cooperation (“JBIC”) and with Sumitomo – Mitsui Banking Corporation. Therefore, prior to making the decision to book the provisions, we initiated negotiations with our creditors to adjust the affected financial covenants, in particular the ratio between EBTIDA and the financial expenses.

     On January 06, 2006, we entered into negotiations with BNDES which accepted (with retroactive application) these new terms and conditions onthe financial institutions acting as its agents under the credit facilities. In view of our failure to comply with certain financial covenants, BNDES decided to retain funds in a blocked account equivalent to the highest installment plus interest due under agreement in an amount of R$252,0 million. In February 1, 2005.2005, the agreements were amended to determine that the funds to be retained shall be equivalent to the highest installment plus interest, instead of three times such figure, as provided for in the initial amendment to the credit facilities. The release of the amount to be blocked will take place when the Company returns to complying with the financial relations set forth in the agreements or it is on 31 December 2004,successful in the renegotiation of financial covenants negotiated.

     On January 30, 2006, the holders of our outstanding debentures of the 4th issuance approved an adjustment to the financial covenant relating to the ratio between Consolidated EBITDA and Consolidated Financial Expenses, contained in Section 4.19.1(e)(i) Escritura de Emissão from equal or higher than 2.25, to equal or higher than 1.5, as of the fourth quarter of 2005, until and including the third quarter of 2006. If we had not obtained this amendment, we would not have been in compliance with these revised covenants. Ifthis financial covenant for the Company had not obtained the referred approval from BNDES, it would notfourth quarter of 2005, when we reached a ratio of 2.17, and were unlikely to be in compliance with this financial covenant during the covenant relatedfirst three quarters of 2006.

     On February 17, 2006, we signed the First Amendment to the levelLoan Agreement entered into with JBIC, dated March 18, 2004, and the First Amendment to the Loan Agreement entered into with Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, dated March 24, 2004. These amendments adjusted the financial covenants in each respective loan agreement relating to EBTIDA and the financial expenses from equal or higher than 2.25, to equal or higher than 1.5, as of its EBTIDA (Earnings Before Taxes, Interest, Depreciationthe fourth


F - 35

Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

quarter until and Amortization) margin,including the third quarter of 2006. For the fourth quarter of 2005 we achieved a Consolidated EBITDA over Consolidated Financial Expenses ratio of 2.17.

     Regarding the loan agreements with BNDES, we failed to comply with the financial covenant of Brasil Telecom Participações’ consolidated results. The Consolidated EBITDA over Consolidated Financial Expenses ratio was supposed to remain above or equal to 2.50, but we reached 2.19 in the fourth quarter of 2005. Following the provisions established in the agreements, BNDES started to run, as definedfrom April 2006, a retention up to R$250 million of our cash investments, without penalties concerning interest or fees, which will be valid until we achieve the 2.50 ratio.

     On February 3, 2006, we obtained a waiver from BNDES in such loansorder to avoid the acceleration of the agreements in view of a potential failure to comply with the financial covenants of Brasil Telecom Participações' consolidated results in the first half of 2006.

     Compliance with these covenants in future periods will depend upon our financial and financing contracts.

     The loansoperating performance, which may be affected by adverse business, market and financingeconomic conditions. If we are guaranteed byunable to comply with these covenants, or to obtain waivers from our lenders, our debt agreements may be accelerated and the credits derived from the provisionterms of telephone services.our debt agreements may be otherwise amended adversely. If we are unable to meet our debt service obligations or comply with our debt covenants, we could be forced to restructure or refinance our indebtedness, seek additional equity capital or sell assets.

i.Swap contracts

     As of December 31, 2004,2005, the Company had R$632,142 (R$755,335 (R$235,784 as of December 31, 2003)2004) of debt denominated in U.S. dollars and R$431,947 (R$565,498 as of December 31, 2004) of debt denominated in Yens, before hedge adjustments.

     The Company entered into several swaps transactions in order to limit losses from fluctuations of the Brazilian real. The market risk on these swap contracts results from changes in the Brazilian deposit certificate rates (CDI) versus changes in the exchange rate. The main terms of these swap transactions are as follows:

(a) The interbank deposit certificate rate is that quoted by CETIP (Central de Custódia e de Liquidação).
(b)The change in the exchange rate is that quoted by the Brazilian Central Bank, plus an annual fixed interest rate of from 1.9% to 26.0% per annum.

(a) The interbank deposit certificate rate is that quoted by CETIP (Central de Custódia e de Liquidação).

(b) The change in the exchange rate is that quoted by the Brazilian Central Bank, plus an annual fixed interest rate of from 1.9% to 26.0% per annum.

     If the amount calculated under the terms described in (a) is greater than the amount calculated under (b), the Company must pay the banks the difference between the two calculations. If the amount calculated under the terms of (b) is greater than the amount calculated under (a), the banks must pay the difference to the Company.

     The details of the notional values and maturity periods are as follows:


F - 3236


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

The details of the notional values and maturity periods are as follows:

December 31, 2004  December 31, 2004
   
U. S. dollars/UMBNDES Yen  U. S. dollars/UMBNDES Yen
   
     
Number of contracts 30 91  34  91 
Original values ($ thousand) 39,259 21,572,765  42,441  21,572,765 
 
Maturity periods ($ thousand):      
Up to 1 year 23,564 413,763  35,559  2,888,056 
1 to 3 years 15,695 21,159,002  6,882  18,684,709 

     The Company accounts for these swap transactions by calculating the unrealized gain or loss at each balance sheet date based on what would have been the results of settlement of the outstanding contracts at that date. The gain or loss for a period is recorded in financial income or expense of such period.

     The swap operations resulted in a gain of R$28,874, and losses of R$83,188, R$92,735 and R$92,735 during266,572during the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2004,2005, respectively, which were recorded in financial expense and financial income, accordingly.

24. Provisions for contingencies

a) Contingent Liabilities

     The Company and its subsidiaries periodically perform an assessment for contingencies risks, and also review lawsuits taking into consideration the legal, economic, taxes and accounting aspects. The assessment of these risks aims at classifying them according to the chances of an unfavorable outcome betweenamong the alternatives of probable, possible or remote, taking into account, according to the circumstances, the opinion of its legal counselors.advisors.

     Provisions are recognized for those contingencies where the risks are classified as probable. Contingencies classified as possible or remote are discussed in this Note. In certain situations, due to legal requirements or precautionary measures, judicial deposits are made to guarantee the continuity of the cases in litigation. These lawsuits are under discussion in progressadministrative and judicial spheres and in variousseveral levels, from lower courts including administrative, lower, and higher courts.to the extraordinary ones.

     It is also worth mentioning that the notice presented below shows, in some cases, identical objects with different classifications of risk level, fact that is justified by specific factual or procedural status related to each lawsuit.

Labor Claims

     The provision for labor claims includes an estimate by the Company’s management, supported by the opinion of its legal counselors, of the probable losses related to lawsuits filed by former employees of the Company, and of service providers.providers related to the labor matter.

Tax Suits

     The provision for tax contingencies refers mainly to matters related to tax collections due to differences in interpretation of the tax legislation by the Company’s legal counsel and the tax authorities.

Civil Suits

F - 37


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

     The provision for civil contingencies refers to casesan estimate of lawsuits related to contractual adjustments arising from Federal Government economic plans and other cases related to community telephony plans.

F - 33


BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)plans and suit for damages and consumers lawsuits.

Classification by Risk Level

Contingencies with Probable Risk

     Contingencies classified as having a probable risk of loss, for which provisions are recorded under liabilities, have the following balances:

 Year ended December 31,  Year ended December 31, 
  
 2003  2004  2004  2005 
    
Labor  424,097  414,221   414,221  567,273 
Tax  65,970  109,936   109,936  161,068 
Civil  208,678  214,688   214,688  276,018 
    
Total  698,745  738,845   738,845  1,004,359 
    
Current  48,509  327,643   327,643  336,643 
Non-current  650,236  411,202   411,202  667,716 

     Changes in the provision for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2004,2005, were as follows:

 Year ended December 31,  Year ended December 31, 
  
  2002  2003   2004  2003  2004       2005 
      
Beginning balances  378,478  389,224  698,745  389,224  698,745  738,845 
Contingencies paid during the year  (18,413) (50,192) (212,100) (50,192) (212,100) (215,942)
Additional provisions  55,475  386,976  355,224  386,976  355,224  484,253 
Reversal of provisions  (26,316) (27,263) (103,023) (27,263) (103,023) (2,797)
      
Ending balances  389,224  698,745  738,845  698,745  738,845  1,004,359 
      

Labor

There was a decreasenet increase in labor contingences in 20042005 of R$9,876.153,052. This decreaseincrease is caused by the recognition of monetary restatements and effects of the reassessmentrevaluations of contingent risks, derived from events occurred in the year, that determine the additional recognition of a provision in the amount of R$170,052,256,598, by new additions amounting to R$26,92517,722, reclassification of other liabilities totaling R$ 1,596 and byreduction due to payments which amounted to R$207,070. 123,085.

The provision was also increased byrevaluations of the amountcontingent risks are mainly connected to reviews of R$217 duejudicial proceedings related to labor contingenciesjoint/subsidiary liability, overtime, salary parity, risks, reintegration, tenure, remuneration differences and supplement of VANT and MetroRED at the date these companies startedFGTS indemnifying fine resulting from understated inflation, amounting to be consolidated.R$ 139,204

The main objects that affect the provisions for labor claims are the following:

(i)     Additional Remuneration for Hazardous Activities - related to the claim for payment of additional remuneration for hazardous activities, based on Law 7,369/85, regulated by Decree 93,412/86, due to the supposed risk of contact by the employee with the electric power system;
(ii)     Salary Differences and Consequences - related, mainly, to requests for salary increases due to supposedly unfulfilled union negotiations. They are related to the repercussion of the salary increase supposedly due on the others sums calculated based on the employees’ salaries;

(i) Risk Premium - related to the claim for payment of additional remuneration for hazardous activities, based on Law 7,369/85, regulated by Decree 93,412/86, due to the supposed risk of contact by the employee with the electric power system;

F - 3438


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

(iii)     Career plan - related to the request for application of the career and salaries plan for employees of the Santa Catarina Branch (formerly Telesc), with promotions for seniority and merit, supposedly not granted by the former Telesc;
(iv)     Joint Responsibility - related to the request to ascribe responsibility to the Company, made by outsourced personnel, due to supposed nonobservance of their labor rights by their real employers;
(v)     Overtime supposedly not paid;
(vi)     Re-integration - impossibility to terminate labor contract without a fair justification; and
(vii)     Potential payment of dividends over profit sharing attributed to Santa Catarina branch.

(ii) Salary Differences and Consequences - related, mainly, to requests for salary increases due to supposedly unfulfilled union negotiations. They are related to the repercussion of the salary increase supposedly due on the others sums calculated based on the employees’ salaries;

(iii) Career plan - related to the request for application of the career and salaries plan for employees of the Santa Catarina Branch (formerly Telesc), with promotions for seniority and merit, supposedly not granted by the former Telesc;

(iv) Joint/Subsidiary Responsibility - related to the request to ascribe responsibility to the Company, made by outsourced personnel, due to supposed nonobservance of their labor rights by their direct employers;  

(v) Overtime - refers to the pleading for salary and additional payment due to labor supposedly performed beyond the contracted work time;    

(vi) Reintegration - pleading due to supposed inobservance of employee’s special condition, guaranteeing the impossibility to terminate labor contract without a cause;    

(vii) Request for the application of regulation, which established the payment of the percentage incurring on the Company’s income, attributed to Santa Catarina branch, and

(viii) Supplement of FGTS fine arising from understated inflation – it refers to requests to supplement indemnification of FGTS fine, due to the recomposition of accounts of this fund by understated inflation.

Brasil Telecom S.A. filed a lawsuit against Caixa Econômica Federal, with a view to ensuring the reimbursement of all amounts paid for this purpose.

Tax

During 2004 there was anIn 2005, the provision at the amount of R$ 51,132 had a net increase, represented by monetary restatements and effects of revaluations of contingent risks, arising from events which occurred in the year, which totaled a reduction of R$43,966 represented mainly, by 36,466, recording of new provisions at the amount of R$14,665 relating 92,851 and reduction due to payments that totaled R$ R$ 5,253.

The entry of new amounts refers to the reassessmentCompany’s decision to record provisions related to ICMS credits, of risks less monetary restatement, R$22,236, being of new additionswhich validity is questioned by the State Tax Authorities, and payments amountinga conclusive decision by the Judiciary Branch has not been rendered yet. It is also important to R$1,186. Additionally, there was also an increase of R$37,581 as a resultpoint out that adjustments were made in the Tax Recovery Program (“REFIS”), with partial recognition of the acquisition in May 2004 of MetroRED and Vant.surplus debt.

TheIn addition, other main lawsuits provided for are as follows:

(i)

(i) Social security - Related to the non-collection of incident social security education allowance;

(ii) Federal Revenue Department - Incorrect compensation of tax losses; and
(iii)CPMF - Non-collection of the contribution on financial activities.

Civil

The increase in 2004 in the amount of R$6,010 is represented, mainly, by reassessments of the contingency risks and recognition of monetary restatement amountingpayment made to R$19,717cooperative companies, as well as new additions amounting to R$30,943 and payments totaling R$44,650.

The lawsuits provided are the following:divergence of understanding about the allowance that comprise the contribution’s salary; and;

(i)     Review of contractual conditions - Lawsuit where a company which supplies equipment filed legal action against the Company, asking for a review of contractual conditions due to economic stabilization plans;
(ii)     Contracts of Financial Participation - The position related by the Ministry of the Communications has been agreed to in the Court of Appeals of Rio Grande do Sul. Such cases are in various phases: First instance, Court of Appeals and Higher Court of Appeals; andd to the incorrect procedure previously adopted by the former CRT in processes related to the application of a rule enacte

F - 3539


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

(iii)     Other lawsuits - related to various ongoing lawsuits such as indemnification for pain and suffering and material damages to consumers, indemnification for contractual rescission, indemnification for accidents, as well as lawsuits that are in Special Civil Courts whose claims, separately, do not exceed forty minimum salaries.

(ii) Federal Revenue Department several assessments challenging supposed irregularities committed by the Company, such as undue tax losses carryforward taken place prior to the merger of the other operators of the Region II of the PGO.

Civil

In 2005, a provision at the amount of R$ 61,330 had a net increase, represented by monetary restatements and effects of revaluations of contingent risks, arising from events which occurred in the year, which totaled R$ 102,222, filings of new lawsuits at the amount of R$ 48,308 and reduction due to payments, which totaled R$ 89,200.

The revaluations of contingent risks mainly refer to lawsuits subject to capital participation agreements, lawsuit for damages and consumer lawsuits, which amounted to R$ 48,404.

The lawsuits provided are the following:

(i) Review of contractual conditions - Lawsuit where a company which supplies equipment filed legal action against the Company, asking for a review of contractual conditions due to economic stabilization plans;

(ii) Capital Participation Agreements - TJ/RS (court of appeals) has been firmly positioned as to the incorrect procedure previously adopted by the former CRT in lawsuits related to the application of a rule enacted by the Ministry of the Communications. Such lawsuits are positioned in various phases: lower courts, Court of Appeals and Superior Court of Justice;

(iii) Customer service centers – public civil actions, comprising the closing of customer services centers;

(iv) Free Mandatory Telephone Directories – LTOG’s - lawsuits questioning the non- delivery of printed residential telephone directories; and

(v) Other lawsuits - related to various lawsuits in progress, comprising civil liability suits, indemnifications for contractual termination and consumer matters under procedural progress in the Special Courts, Courts of Law and Federal Courts throughout the country.

Contingencies with Possible Risk

The position of contingencies with levels of risk considered to be possible, and therefore not recorded in the accounts, is the following:

 Year ended December 31,  Year ended December 31, 
  
 2003  2004  2004  2005 
    
Labor  625,266  649,328  659,328  429,169 
Tax  863,967  1,249,108  1,185,108  2,111,323 
Civil  740,535  1,006,266  1,060,266  1,833,336 
    
Total  2,229,768  2,904,702  2,904,702  4,373,828 
    

F - 40


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

Labor

In 2005, a net reduction occurred at the amount of R$ 230,159, represented by monetary restatements and effects of revaluations of contingent risks, arising from events occurred in the year, which totaled R$ 299,969, filings of new lawsuits at the amount of R$ 69,810.

The reduction resulted from revaluation of risks mainly referring to reviews of lawsuits related to joint/subsidiary responsibility, overtime, salary parity, risks, reintegration, and tenure, differences of profit sharing and supplement of FGTS indemnifying fine resulting from understated inflation.

The filings of new lawsuits mainly refer to those related to joint/subsidiary responsibility and supplement of FGTS indemnifying fine resulting from understated inflation.

The main objects that comprise the possible losses of a labor nature are related to additional remuneration for hazardous activities,The main objects that comprise the possible losses of a labor nature are related to joint/subsidiary responsibility, supplement of FGTS indemnifying fine resulting from understated inflation, risk premium, promotions and joint responsibility, the evaluation of which processes by the legal assessors resulted in a level of risk of loss evaluated only as possible. As well as the cited objects, also contribute to the aforementioned amount the petitionrequest for remunerativeremuneration consideration for work hours of works supposedly exceeding the normal workingregular workload of hours agreed upon betweenalso contributed to the parties.amount mentioned.

Tax

The increase occurringwhich took place in 20042005 was R$ 926,215, presented by monetary restatements and effects of revaluation of contingent risks, arising from events which took place in the year, which totaled R$385,141 refers, 708,278 and filings of new lawsuits at the amount of R$ 217,937.

The revaluations mainly new additions amountingarise from lawsuits dealing with the assessment of pension plan contribution on allowances, which, according to R$167,348 related to ICMS on the international calls and activationunderstanding of the Company do not comprise the contribution salary, once its exclusion is expressly provided for in the Article 28, paragraph 7, of Law 8,212/91, the Costing Plan.

Matters whose merit have not been conclusively decided by the Higher Courts, such as the transfer of PIS/COFINS, the levy of ISS in auxiliary services and others, and additionsnot listed in the Services List attached to LC #116/03, as well as the reversal of ICMS credits, in the interpretation of the Tax Authorities, were reclassified.

The entries of new contingencies refer to amounts supposedly due related to the non-paymentFund for Universalization of Telecommunications Service – FUST, by virtue of illegal retroactivity, according to the Company’s understanding of the change in the understanding of its calculation basis by ANATEL, in judicial discussion, new assessments dealing with the supposed levy of ICMS in the activities described in the Agreement #69/98, as well as questioning exemption granted by state law, in addition to the supposed levy of ISS on auxiliary services to communication.

Also concerning FUST, this fund was enacted by Law #9,998/00 and to an alternative interpretationregulated by the Decree #3,624/00, establishing a contribution of 1% over gross revenue from telecommunications, minus the installments of PIS taxation. Additionally, a significant amounttaxes incurring on the referred revenue and the transfers made among operators. The levy started taking place as of additions arose as a result of the reassessment of risks (R$47,402) and from monetary restatement (R$148,627).1/1/01.

The main lawsuits considered as possible loss are presented as follows:

(i)     ICMS (State VAT) - On international calls;
(ii)     ICMS (State VAT) - Differential of rate in interstate acquisitions;
(iii)     ICMS (State VAT) - Exploitation of credits related to the acquisition of fixed assets for use and consumption;
(iv)     SS (Service Tax) - Not collected and/or under-collected;
(v)     INSS (Social Security) - alternative interpretation of the basis of calculation;
(vi)     PIS and COFINS - transfer to final consumer

F - 3641


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

(vii)     Federal Taxes - filings for supposed lack of collection; and
(viii)     Withholding tax (IRRF) - Operations related to hedge for covering debts.

By means of the Resolution #247, as of 12/14/00, ANATEL ruled the calculation system of the referred contribution, promptly adopted by the Company until 1/31/04, when the regulating agency issued the Order # 29/03, which recognized the deductibility of the transfer to other operators, of interconnection in the calculation basis, criterion adopted in the period from February 2004 to November 2005.

On December 31, 2005, ANATEL by means of the Abstract 01 determined a new calculation basis for the contribution to FUST, with retroactive effects since 1/1/01. With the increase in the calculation basis by “infralegal” (decree or administrative act of lower hierarchy) normative act and non-retroactivity of effects of Abstract 01/05, the Company brought lawsuit, represented by the Brazilian Association of Switched Fixed Telephone Service Concessionaires– ABRAFIX and jointly with other non-affiliated operators, to remove its application. While the injunction is not granted, the Company opted for judicial deposit as from December 2005.

On December 31, 2005, the balance provisioned for FUST, recorded in the indirect taxes liabilities was R$ 8,004, amount of which destined to judicial deposit in January 2006.

The difference of amount among criteria of Resolution 247/00 and Order 29/03 is R$ 34,639, unfavorable to the Subsidiary, which according to its internal and external legal advisors, based on the Federal Constitution and Brazilian Tax Code, the risk of loss associated with the matter under discussion is assessed as possible.

The other main lawsuits considered as possible loss are presented as follows:

(i) Administrative defenses in lawsuits filed by the Internal Revenue Service, arising from differences of amounts between DCTF and DIPJ;

(ii) Public class suits questioning the alleged transfer of PIS and COFINS to the end consumers;

(iii) ICMS (State VAT) - On international calls;

(iv) ICMS (State VAT) - Differential of rate in interstate acquisitions;

Civil

The increase occurringoccurred in 20042005 was R$265,731 773,070, represented by monetary restatements and is represented,effects of revaluation of contingent risks, arising from event which occurred in the year, which totaled a net reduction of R$ 99,633 and filings of new lawsuits at the amount of R$872,703.

The reduction resulting from revaluation of risks mainly by an increaserefer to reclassification for probable risk of R$231,042lawsuits subject to capital participation agreements, lawsuit for damages and consumer lawsuits.

The filings of new lawsuits are basically comprised of lawsuits related to shares originating in a capitalization process where a larger numberpleadings for distribution of shares in the capital is demanded in relation to that which was issued, as well as corresponding dividends claimed. Other variations refer mainly to monetary restatementlawsuits of Brasil Telecom S.A., resulting from former PCT’s (Community Telephony Program), civil liability lawsuits and reassessment of risks.consumer lawsuits.

The main lawsuits are presented as follows:

(i)     Repayments resulting from Community Telephony Program lawsuits (PCT) - the plaintiffs intend to pay the compensations related to the contracts resulting from the Community Telephony Program. Such proceedings are encountered in various phases: First instance, Court of Appeals and Higher Court of Appeals;
(ii)     Lawsuits of a consumer nature;
(iii)     Contractual - Lawsuits related to the claim for a percentage resulting from the Real Plan, to be applied in a contract for rendering services, review of conversion of installments in URV and later in reais, related to the supply of equipment and rendering of services; and
(iv)     Attendance for customers points - Public civil lawsuits arising from the closing of customer attendance points.

F - 42


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

(i) Repayments resulting from Community Telephony Program lawsuits (PCT) - the plaintiffs intend to pay the compensations related to the contracts resulting from the Community Telephony Program. Such proceedings are encountered in various phases: lower courts, Court of Appeals and Higher Court of Appeals;

(ii) Lawsuits of a consumer nature; and

(iii) reais, related to the supply of equipment and rendering of services.

Contingencies with Remote Risk

In addition to the claims mentioned above, there are also contingencies considered to be of remote risk in the total amount of R$1,250,574 (R$1,440,384 (R$1,265,978 in 2003)2004). This decrease are shown by nature, whose amounts of Labor Contingencies are R$ 166,755 (R$ 165,332 in 2004); Tax Contingencies are R$ 676,877 (999,069 in 2004); and the Civil Contingencies are R$ 406,942 (R$275,983 in 2004).

Management does not believe that the ultimate outcome of any litigation described above will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, or results of operations after consideration of the provisions described above.

Letters of Guarantee

The Company has contracts for letters of guarantees signed with financial institutions, as a complementary guarantee for lawsuits in provisory execution, in the amount of R$620,739 (R$311,976 (R$124,947 on December 31, 2003)2004). Most of these contracts representing 10%, have a stated period for termination during 2004 and the remainder is for an indeterminate period of time. The remuneration for these contracts varies between 0.65%0.50% p.a. and 4.00%2.00% p.a., representing a weighted average rate of 0.98%0.90% p.a.

The judicial deposits related to the contested contingencies and tributes (suspended liability) are presented in Note 15.

b) Contingent Assets

As follows, the tax claims promoted by the Company are shown, through which the recovery of tax paid is claimed, calculated differently from interpretation sustained by its legal advisers, the assessment of success in future filing of appeals is assessed as probable:

PIS/COFINS: judicial dispute about the application of Law 9,718/98, which increased the calculation basis for PIS and COFINS. The period comprised by Law was from February 1999 to November 2002 for PIS and from February 1999 to January 2004 for COFINS. The amount estimated recoverable is R$ 116,220. In November 2005, STF (Federal Supreme Court) concluded the judgment of certain lawsuits dealing with such issue and considered unconstitutional the increase of calculation basis introduced by said Law.

The Company is awaiting the judgments of lawsuits and did not recognize the amount attributed to contingent assets in the financial statements

F - 3743


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

F - 44


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

25.Provision for pensions and other benefits

a. Pension and other post employment benefit plans

     Brasil Telecom sponsors various private pension plans designed to provide retirement benefits and medical assistance to employees and their dependents. These plans are managed byby: (i) Fundação 14 de Previdência Privada (“Fundação 14”); (ii) Fundação BrTPREV (“FBrTPREV”), former Fundação dos Empregados da Companhia Riograndense de Telecomunicações (FCRT), which administered the benefit plans of CRT, acquired in 2000; and (iii) Fundação de Seguridade Social (SISTEL), which managed plans for pension and other post retirement benefits for most companies of the former Telebrás System, and Fundação BrTPrev, former Fundação dos Empregados da Companhia Riograndense de Telecomunicações (FCRT), which administered the benefit plans of CRT, acquired in 2000.BrTPrev.

     The Company bylaws stipulate approval of the supplementary pension policy and the joint liability attributed to the defined benefit plans is subject to the acts signed with the foundations, with the agreement of the Supplementary Pensions National Department - PREVIC (Superintendência Nacional de Previdência Complementar), formerly National Secretary of Private Pension - SPC (Secretaria de Previdência Complementar), when applicable to the specific plans.

     The status of each plan is reviewed annually by independent actuaries at the balance sheet date. In the case of defined benefit plans, immediate recognition is given to actuarial gains and losses and as from 2001 the Company has established a liability in the balance sheet for the deficits of those plans showing deficits, following the requirements of CVM Instruction 371/00. In the case of plans that show surpluses, no assets are recognized due to the legal impossibility of distributing the surpluses.

Details of the pension plans are as follows:

a.1 SISTELFUNDAÇÃO 14

     In 2000,As from the Fundação SISTEL was segmented in several plans with financial autonomy, managed, controlled and accounted for independently, in accordance with the specific legislation. Subsequently, these plans, which were defined benefit plans, were converted to defined contribution plans following the human resources policy of each respective sponsor (the new concessionaires). As a further stepsplit of the privatization process (onceonly pension plan managed by SISTEL, the sponsors became competitors among themselves),PBS, in January 2000, already predicted the Company requested the incorporation of itsevolution trend for a new stage. Such stage would result in an own and legally separatedindependent management model for TCSPREV pension plan, -by means of a specific entity to manage and to operate them, and this fact has become more and more evident throughout the years. This trend also occurred in other main SISTEL pension plan sponsoring companies, which created their respective supplementary pension plan foundations. In this scenario, Fundação 14 de Previdência Privada - towas created in 2004, with the Supplementary Pensions National Department - PREVIC (Superintendência Nacionalpurpose of taking over the management and operation of the TCSPREV pension plan, which started as from March 10, 2005, whose process was backed by the segment’s specific legislation and properly approved by the Secretaria de Previdência Complementar), formerly National Secretary of Private Pension -Complementar – SPC (Secretaria(the Brazilian pension’s regulatory authority).

     In accordance with the Transfer Agreement entered into between Fundação Sistel de Seguridade Social and Fundação 14 de Previdência Complementar). This request was approved in October 7, 2004. Afterwards, on November 03, 2004, a request to transferPrivada, SISTEL, by means of the TCSPREV plan from SISTEL to this new entityManagement Agreement, has been submitted but has not been approved yet.rendering management and operation services of TCSPREV and PAMEC-BrT plans to Fundação 14, after the transferring of these plans, which took place on March 10, 2005, for a period of up to 18 months, while Fundação 14 organizes itself to take over the management and operation services of its plans..

a.1.1 Description of the plans

PBS-A -TCSPREV (Defined Contribution, Settled Benefit and Defined benefitBenefit)pension plan, PAMA - Retirees’ health care plan and PCE - SpecialCoverage Plan (Defined Contribution)

     The Company, together with other companies, sponsors a defined benefit private pension plan and a post-retirement benefit health care plan managed by Fundação SISTEL de Seguridade Social (“SISTEL”), the PBS-A and PAMA plans for participants that had the status of beneficiaries on January 31, 2000.

F - 3845


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

     The PAMA plan was subsequently expanded to cover all the beneficiaries of the PBS-TCS Group, incorporated into TCSPREV (see below) on December 31, 2001, except for those in the PBT-BrT plan. According to legal and actuarial opinions, the sponsor’s liability for contributions to the PAMA plan is exclusively limited to 1.5% of the payroll of active participants. An optional migration from the PAMA to the PCE took place during 2004. The participants who opted for this migration now contribute to the PCE.

TCSPREV - Defined contribution plans

This defined contribution plan and settled benefitsbenefit plan was introduced on February 28, 2000.2/28/00. On December 31, 2001,12/31/01, all the pension plans sponsored by the Company and managed bywith SISTEL were transformed into defined contribution plans with settled benefitsmerged, being exceptionally and were merged into TCSPREV. The reorganization was subsequentlyprovisionally approved by the SPC.Secretaria de Previdência Complementar – SPC of document sent to that Agency, due to the need for adjustments to the regulations. Thus, TCSPREV is comprised of defined contribution groups with settled and defined benefits. The plans that were merged into the TCSPREV were the PBS-TCS, PBT-BrT, the BrT Management Agreement, plan and the Supplementary Plan forUnusual Contractual Relation Instrument, and the Paraná branch employees.conditions established in the original plans were maintained. In March 2003, this plan was no longer offered to the sponsors’ new contracted ones. However, this plan, concerning the defined contribution, started being offered as of March 2005. TCSPREV currently serves around 55.4%provides assistance to nearly 61.9% of active employees.the staff.

PAMEC-BrT - Health-care plan– Health Care Plan for Supplementary Pension Beneficiaries (Defined Benefit)

     ThisDestined for health care plan coversof retirees in theand pensioners subject to Grupo PBT-BrT, pension plan, which was incorporatedmerged into the TCSPREV plan on December 31, 2001.12/31/01.

a.1.2 Contributions

PBS-A -TCSPREV (Defined Contribution, Settled Benefit and Defined benefit pension plan, PAMA - Retirees’ health care plan andPCE - SpecialCoverage Plan (Defined Contribution)

     Contributions to the PBS-A plan are only required in case of an actuarial deficit. As of December 31, 2004, the PBS-A plan was in surplus.

     The PAMA plan is maintained with contributions of 1.5% of the payroll of active participants linked to the PBS plans, segregated and sponsored by the several SISTEL sponsors. In the case of Brasil Telecom, PBS-TCS was incorporated into the TCSPREV plan on December 31, 2001, and became an internal group of the plan. The participants who opted for the migration from the PAMA to the PCE now contribute to the latter.

TCSPREV - Defined contribution planBenefit)

     Contributions to this plan, were maintained on the same basis as the original plans incorporated in 2001 for eachby group of participants, and wereare established based on actuarial studies prepared by independent actuaries according to regulations in force in Brazil, using the capitalization system to determine the costs. Currently, contributions are made by the participants and the sponsor only for the internal groups PBS-TCS (defined benefit) and TCSPREV (defined contribution). In the case of the PBS-TCS defined benefit planTCSPREV group, the Company’s contribution was 12% of the payroll of the participants, whilst the employees’ contribution varied according to the age, service time and salary. In the remaining TCSPREV defined contribution plan groups, the contributions are made equally by the employee and the Company and are credited intoin individual accounts of each participant. Theparticipant, equally by employee and sponsor, and the basic contribution percentages vary between 3% and 8% of the participant’s salary – limited to R$ 18,582.00 for 2005 - , according to participant’s age. In addition, participantsParticipants have the option to contribute voluntarily andor sporadically to the plan above the basic contribution, but without equal payments fromparity of the Company. In the case of the PBS-TCS group, the sponsor’s contribution corresponds to 12% of the payroll of the participants; while the employees’ contribution varies according to the age, service time and salary. An entry fee may also be payable depending on the age of entering the plan. The Company issponsors are responsible for the administrative cost of the planall administrative expenses and disbursement of therisk benefits. In 20042005, contributions by the Companysponsor to the TCSPREV group represented on average 6.75%6.41% of the payroll of the plan participants. For employees, the contributions represented 5.79% .

PAMEC-BrT – Health Care Plan for Supplementary Pension Beneficiaries (Defined Benefit)

     The contribution for this plan was fully paid in July 1998, through a single payment. New contributions are limited to future necessity to cover expenses, if that occurs.

a.2 FUNDAÇÃO SISTEL DE SEGURIDADE SOCIAL (SISTEL)

     The supplementary pension plan, which remains under SISTEL’s management, comes from the period before the Telebrás’ Spin-off and assists participants whilstwho had the average employee contributionstatus of beneficiaries in January 2000 (PBS-A). SISTEL also manages the PAMA/PAMA-PCE pension plan, formed by participants was 6.08% (2003, 7.31%assisted by the PBS-A Plan, the PBS’s plans segregated by sponsor in January 2000 and 6.58% respectively).PBS-TCS’ Internal Group, merged into the TCSPREV plan in December 2001..

F - 3946


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

PAMEC-BrTa.2.1 Description of the plans

PBS-A - Health-careDefined benefitpension plan

     Maintained jointly with other sponsors subject to the provision of telecommunications services and destined for participants that had the status of beneficiaries on 1/31/00.

PAMA - Retirees’ health care plan and PCE - Special Coverage Plan (Defined Contribution)

     Maintained jointly with other sponsors subject to the provision of telecommunications services and destined for participants that had the status of beneficiaries on 1/31/00, for the beneficiaries of the PBS-TCS Group, merged into TCSPREV on 12/31/01 and for the participants of PBS’s defined benefit plans sponsored by other companies. According to a legal/actuarial appraisal, the Company’s responsibility is exclusively limited to future contributions. During 2004, an optional migration of retirees and pensioners of PAMA took place for new coverage conditions (PCE). The participants who opted for the migration began to contribute to PCE.

a.2.2 Contributions

PBS-A - Defined benefit pension plan

     Contributions may occur in case of accumulated deficit. On 12/31/05, the actuarial appraisal date, the plan presented a surplus.

PAMA - Retirees’ health care plan andPCE - Special Coverage Plan (Defined Contribution)

     This plan is sponsored by contributions of 1.5% on payroll of active participants subject to PBS plans, segregated and sponsored by several SISTEL sponsors. In the case of Brasil Telecom, the PBS-TCS was merged into the TCSPREV plan on 12/31/01, and began to constitute an internal group of the plan. Contributions by retirees and pensioners who migrated to PCE are also carried out.

a.3 Fundação BrTPrev

The main purpose of the Company sponsoring BrTPREV is to maintain the supplementary retirement, pension and other provisions in addition to those provided by the official social security system to participants. The actuarial system for this plan were fully paid in July 1998. Newdetermining the plan’s cost and contributions will be limited to the future necessity to cover expenses, if that occurs.

a.2 FBrTPrevis collective capitalization, valued annually by an independent actuary.

a.2.1a.3.1 Description of the plans

BrTPREV plan

     The BrTPREVDefined contribution plan was introduced on October 21, 2002 as a defined contribution and settled benefits, launched in October 2002, destined for the concession of pension plan benefits supplementary to provide supplementary pension benefits to employeesthose of the former CRT. In March 2003 thisofficial pension plan was also openedand that initially assisted only employees subject to the Subsidiary Rio Grande do Sul. This pension plan remained open to new employees of the Company and its subsidiaries who wishedfrom March 2003 to participate inFebruary 2005, when its offering was suspended. Currently, BrTPREV provides assistance to nearly 35.2% of the sponsored complementary social security plans. BrTPREV currently covers approximately 39.5% of employees.staff. .

Brasil Telecom Founder and Alternative plans

     The Brasil Telecom Founder and AlternativeF - 47


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

     Defined benefits plans are defined contribution and settled benefit plans, nowdestined to provide supplementary social security benefits in addition to those of the official social security, closed to the entry of new participants. Currently, these plans attend 0.9%assist approximately 0.1% of the employee staff.

a.2.2a.3.2 Contributions

BrTPREV plan

     The contributions to this plan are established based on actuarial studies prepared by independent actuaries according to the regulations in force in Brazil, using the capitalization system to determine the costs. Contributions are made equally by the employee and the Company and are credited into individual accounts of each participant. The basic contribution percentages vary between 3% and 8% of the participant’s salary (limited to R$ 19,222 per year), according to age. In addition, participants have the option to contribute voluntarily and sporadically to the plan above the basic contribution, but without equal payments from the Company. The Company is responsible for the administrative cost of the plan and the disbursement of the benefits. In 20042005 contributions by the Company represented on average 5.86%6.21% of the payroll of the plan participants, whilst the average employee contribution was 5.11% (6.79%5.43% (5.86% and 5.87%5.11% respectively in 2003)2004).

Brasil Telecom Founder and Alternative plans

     The regular Company contributions in 20042005 to the Founder plan were an average of 2.48%4.06% of the participants’ payroll. Employees contributed at variable rates according to age, service time and salary, at an average rate in 20042005 of 2.39% (20034.06% (2004 - 5.18%2.39%) . In the Alternative Brazil Telecom plan, the participants also pay an entrance fee, depending on age when joining the plan.

     The technical deficit corresponding to the current value of the Company’s supplementary contribution, due toas a result of the actuarial deficiencydeficit of the plans managed by FBrTPrev, must be amortizedFBrTPREV, have the settlement within the maximum established period of 20twenty years, as from January 2000, in accordance with2002, according to Circular 66/SPC/GAB/COA from the requirements of the Pensions regulator.Supplementary Pension Department dated 1/25/02. Of the maximum period established, 1716 years still remain for complete settlement.

F - 4048


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

a.3a.4 Status of the SISTEL and FBrTPrev plans

     The status of the SISTEL and FBrTPrev plans at December 31, 20032004 and 20042005 is presented below, in accordance with CVM Resolution 371/2000:

FBrTPrev - BrTPREV  SISTEL - TCSPREV FBrTPrev – BrTPREV
Founder and Alternative
 FUNDAÇÃO 14 -
TCSPREV 
2003 2004    2003 2004 2004 2005 2004 2005 
CONCILIATION OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
Actuarial liabilities with benefits granted 891,269 973,323  145,934 171,212 973,323 1,290,201 171,212 188,953 
Actuarial liabilities with benefits to be granted 99,483 83,379 273,001 147,861 83,379 72,608 147,861 148,220 
(-) Payments of defined contributions - - (137,132) - - 
(=) Total present value of actuarial liabilities 990,752 1,056,702 281,803 319,073 1,056,702 1,362,809 319,073 337,173 
Fair value of plan assets (486,348)(555,256)(573,834)(475,911)(555,256)(634,894)(475,911)(645,051)
(-) Payments of defined contributions - - 137,132 - - 
Fair value of plan assets (486,348)(555,256)(436,702)(475,911)
(=) Net Actuarial Liability/(Asset) 504,404 501,446 (154,899)(156,838)501,446 727,915 (156,838)(307,878)
 
CHANGES IN NET ACTUARIAL LIABILITY/ (ASSETS) CHANGES IN NET ACTUARIAL LIABILITY/ (ASSETS)
CHANGES IN NET ACTUARIAL LIABILITY/ (ASSETS)
Present value of actuarial liability - beginningof period 922,150 990,752   503,729 281,803 990,752 1,056,702 281,803 319,073 
Cost of interest 163,035 160,304 84,790 31,013 160,304 164,212 31,013 35,187 
Current service cost 6,502 377 33,827 3,700 377 141 3,700 4,090 
Net benefits paid (92,657)(103,089)(13,171)(16,604)
Actuarial (gain) or loss on actuarial liability (2,074)244,843 15,728 (4,573)
   
 
Net benefits paid (125,634)(92,657)(38,629)(13,171)
 
Actuarial (gain) or loss on actuarial liability 24,699 (2.074)(164,782)15,728 
Value of the liability at the end of the year in  
respect of defined contributions received - - (137,132)- - 
Present value of actuarial liability - endof period 990,752 1,056,702 281,803 319,073 1,056,702 1,362,809 319,073 337,173 
Fair value of plan assets at the beginningof the period 420,310 486,348 503,729 436,702 486,348 555,256 436,702 475,911 
Expected income from plan assets 98,832 62,798 80,457 50,932 62,798 84,215 50,932 184,393 
Regular contributions received by the plan 2,380 291 28,277 1,448 291 232 1,448 1,351 
Sponsor 149 18 13,935 889 18 130 889 796 
Participants 2,231 273 14,342 559 273 102 559 555 
Amortization contributions received from the sponsor 90,460 98,476 - - 
 
Amortization contributions received from the  
sponsor 98,476 98,280 
Payment of benefits (125,634)(92,657)(38,629)(13,171)(92,657)(103,089)(13,171)(16,604)
  
 
Value of the Obligations at the end of the exercise
(payment of defined contributions)
- - (137,132)- - 
Fair value of plan assets at the end of the period 486,348 555,256 436,702 475,911 555,256 634,894 475,911 645,051 
(=) Value of the Net ActuarialLiabilities/(Assets)(1) 504,404 501,446 (154,899)(156,838)501,446 727,915 (156,838)(307,878)

(1) The Company does not recognize an asset when the plan is in surplus. 

(1) The Company does not recognize an asset when the plan is in surplus.

F - 4149


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

FBrTPrev – BrTPREV
Founder and Alternative 
   FUNDAÇÃO 14 -
TCSPREV 
2004 2005 2004 2005 
EXPENSE RECOGNIZED IN THE STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Current service cost 6,353 359  33,827 3,700 359 11 3,700 4,090 
Contributions from participants (2,231)(273)(14,342)(559)(273)(102)(559)(555)
Cost of interest 163,035 160,304 - - 160,304 164,212 
Income from plan assets    (98,832) (62,798)- -              (62,798)(84,215)
Actuarial losses recognized      24,699 (2,074)- - (2,074)244,843 
Total expense recognized      93,024 95,518 19,485 3,141 95,518 324,749 3,141 3,535 
PRINCIPAL ACTUARIAL ASSUMPTIONS USED
Discount rate for actuarial liability (6% + inflation) 16.18% 15.54%  11.30%        15.54% 11.30% 
Total income expected from plan assets 16.18% 15,54% 11.83% 18,10%        15,54% 12.34% 18,10% 12.34% 
Estimated index for salary increase 2%        2% 2% 2% 
Mortality table UP84 UP84 + 1 
Overall Mortality table(2)UP84 UP94 + 2 UP84 + 1 UP94 + 2 
Disability table      Álvaro Vindas Mercer Disability Álvaro
Vindas 
Álvaro
Vindas, - 20% until 40
years old;
and +30%
above 40
years old. 
Mercer
Disability 
Álvaro
Vindas, -
20% until
40 years
old; and
+30% above
40 years old. 
Mortality rate of disabled IAPB-57                      IAPB-57 IAPB-57 
Turnover N/A 0.15/(working time +1);  zero after 50 years N/A0.15/(working time
 +1); zero
after 50 years 
N/A 
Retirement age 60 years 
Inflation rate 9.60% 9.00%  5.00% 

(2) In December 2005, the Board of Executive Officers of the Company, in compliance with recommendation of its independent actuaries, approved the adjustments of actuarial assumptions and started to adopt the overall mortality table UP94 with two-year grievance and separated by gender. The table adopted corresponds to current expectation of longevity of participants of sponsored plans. As an effect of such change, the Company recognized a supplement of R$ 170,505 to the provision for pension fund liabilities.
N/A: Not Applicable

Supplementary
Additional information - 2004 2005
a) The assets and liabilities of BrTPREV, Alternativo and Fundador plans are positioned on 12/31/05. Concerning the TCSTPREV plan, the plan assets are the position on November 30, 2004. With referencerefer to BrTPREV the assets were9/30/05, projected to December 31, 2004.for 12/31/05.
b) The individual data used is from September 30, 20042005 and October 31, 20042005 for TCSPREV and BrTPREV,andBrTPREV, respectively. Such data was projected to December 31, 2004,2005, for both the plans.

 SISTEL - PBS-A  SISTEL - PAMEC 
2003 2004 2003 2004 
RECONCILIATION OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES 
Actuarial liabilities with granted benefits 514,254 529,690  2,651 852 
Actuarial liabilities with benefits to grant - - - - 27 34 
(=) Present value of actuarial liabilities 514,254 529,690 2,678 886 
Fair value of plan assets (614,450)(688,827)(992)(1,009)
(=) Net actuarial liability/(asset) (100,196)(159,137)1,686 (123)
CHANGES IN NET ACTUARIAL LIABILITY/(ASSET) 
Present value of actuarial liability beginning of period 430,459 514,254  844 2,678 
Cost of interest 46,683 55,706 147 302 
Current service cost - - - - 
Net benefits paid (40,283)(44,940)(5)(43)
Actuarial (gain) or loss on actuarial liability 77,395 4,670 1,691 (2,052)
Present value of actuarial liability end of period 514,254 529,690 2,678 886 
Fair value of plan assets at the beginning of theperiod 542,744 614,450 844 992 
Income from plan assets 111,989 119,317 153 60 
Payment of benefits (40,283)(44,940)(5)(43)
Fair value of plan assets at the end of the period 614,450 688,827 992 1,009 
(=) Value of the Net Actuarial Liabilities/(Assets)(1) (100,196)(159,137)1,686 (123)

(1) The Company does not recognize an asset when the plan is in surplus. 

EXPENSE RECOGNIZED IN THE STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS 
Constitution of the actuarial liabilities - - - 1,686 (1,686) 
Total expense recognized - - 1,686 (1,686) 

F - 4250


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

PRINCIPAL ACTUARIAL ASSUMPTIONS USED 
Discount rate for actuarial liability 11,30% 11,30%  11,30% 11,30% 
Total income expected from plan assets 11.30% 12,20% 11.30% 16,51% 
Estimated index for increase in benefits  5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 
Mortality table UP84 + 1 UP84 + 1 UP84 + 15 UP84 + 1 
Disability table N/A Mercer Disability 
Mortality rate of disabled UP84 + 1 UP84 + 1 
Starting age for benefits N/A 100% on vesting date 
Inflation rate 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 
 SISTEL - PBS-A FUNDAÇÃO 14 -
PAMEC
2004 2005 2004 2005 
RECONCILIATION OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES 
Actuarial liabilities with granted benefits 529,690 570,260 852 1, 063 
Actuarial liabilities with benefits to grant 34 36 
(=) Present value of actuarial liabilities 529,690 570,260 886 1,099 
Fair value of plan assets (688,827)(738,735)(1,009)(925)
(=) Net actuarial liability/(asset)(159,137)(168,475)(123)174 
CHANGES IN NET ACTUARIAL LIABILITY/(ASSET)
Present value of actuarial liability beginning of
   period 
514,254 529,690 2,678 886 
Cost of interest 55,706 57,197 302 98 
Current service cost 
Net benefits paid (44,940)(46,997)(43)(83)
Actuarial (gain) or loss on actuarial liability 4,670 30,370 (2,052)197 
Present value of actuarial liability end of period 529,690 570,260 886 1,099 
Fair value of plan assets at the beginning of the
   period 
614,450 688,827 992 1,009 
Income from plan assets 119,317 96,905 60 (1)
Payment of benefits (44,940)(46,997)(43)(83)
Fair value of plan assets at the end of the period 688,827 738,735 1,009 925 
(=) Value of the Net Actuarial Liabilities/(Assets)(1)(159,137)(168,475)(123)174 

(1) The Company does not recognize an asset when the plan is in surplus.

EXPENSE RECOGNIZED IN THE STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS 
Constitution of the actuarial liabilities            -            - 1,686              174 
Total expense recognized            -            - 1,686              174 
 
PRINCIPAL ACTUARIAL ASSUMPTIONS USED 
Discount rate for actuarial liability 11.30% 11.30% 11.30% 11.30% 
Total income expected from plan assets 12.20% 13.75% 16.51% 11.47% 
Estimated index for increase in benefits  5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 
General Mortality table UP84 + 1 UP84 + 2 UP84 + 1 UP94 + 2 
Disability table N/A Mercer Disability
 
Starting age for benefits N/A 00% on vesting date 
Inflation rate 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 

N/A: Not Applicable

Supplementary information - 20042005 
a) The assets of the plans are the position for November 30, 2004.2005.
b) The data used is for September 30, 2004,2005 to PBS-A, projected to December 31, 2004.2005. The data used is for November 30, 2005 to PAMEC. 

b. Stock option plans

     On April 28, 2000 the shareholders approved a stock option plan for officers and employees. A maximum of 10% of each kind of Company stock may be used for the plan. Shares derived from exercising options guarantee the beneficiaries the same rights granted to other Company shareholders. Administration of this plan was entrusted to a management committee

F - 51


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

appointed by the Board of Directors, which decided to grant options using only preferred stock. The plan is divided into two separate programs:

b.1 Program A:

     This program is granted as an extension of management’s performance objectives for the Company established by the Board of Directors for a five-year period. Up to December 31, 2004, no stock had been granted under this program.

b.2 Program B:

     The price of exercising is established by the management committee based on the market price of 1,000 shares at the date of the grant of option and will be monetarily restated by the IGP-M between the date of signing the contracts and the payment date.

     The first grant of stock options under Program B occurred on December 17, 2002 with 622,364 options issued. The second grant of options occurred on December 19, 2003 with 308,033 options. 22, 298 options of the first grant lapsed during 2003. The third grant of options occurred on December 21, 2004 with 507,650 options. No options lapsed during 2004.2005.

     The right to exercise the option is given within the following periods as follows:

 First Grant Second Grant Third Grant 
From End of period From End of period From End of period 
33% 01/01/04 12/31/08 12/19/05 12/31/10 12/21/05 12/31/11 
33% 01/01/05 12/31/08 12/19/06 12/31/10 12/21/06 12/31/11 
34% 01/01/06 12/31/08 12/19/07 12/31/10 12/21/07 12/31/11 

F - 43


BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

     Vesting can be anticipated as a result of the occurrence of events or special conditions set forth in the option contract. Options that are not exercised after seven years from the date of execution of the options agreements will expire without compensation. In 2005, options were not granted.

     The information related to the general plan to grant stock options is summarized below:

2003 2004 2004 2005 
Preferred stock options (thousand) Average exercise price R$ Preferred stock options (thousand) Average exercise price R$ Preferred stock
options
(thousand)
Average
exercise price
R$ 
Preferred stock
options
(thousand)
Average
exercise price
R$ 
Opening balance 622,364 11.34 907,469 11.73 907,469 11.73 1,415,119 13.00 
Granted 308,033 12.48 507,650 15,28 507,650 15.28 
Lapsed options (22,928) 11.34 - - 1,004,382 13.00 
Closing balance 907,469 11.73 1,415,119 13,00 1,415,119 13.00 410,737 13.00 

     None of the options granted had been exercised as of the balance sheet date and the balance of the options represents 0.26%0.08% the total outstanding stocks at that date (0.17%(0.26% in 2003)2004).

     Considering the hypothesis that the options will be fully exercised, the opportunity cost of the premiums of the respective options, calculated by the Black-Scholes method, for the Company would be R$482 (R$1,254 (R$829 in 2003)2004).

c. Other employee benefits

F - 52


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

     Other benefits granted to employees include private health and dental care plans, meal allowances, group life insurance, occupational accident insurance, sickness allowance, and transportation subsidies.

26. Shareholders’ equity

a. Share capital

     Authorized capital stock as of December 31, 20042005 was 560 billion shares. The Company’s issued and paid up capital stock is comprised of preferred shares and common shares, all without par value, as shown in the table below:

In thousands of shares 
  In thousands of shares 
Common Preferred Subtotal Treasuryshares Total    
   Treasury 
  Common  Preferred  Subtotal  shares Total 
Number of shares as of December 31, 2001 237,165,397 295,569,091 532,734,488  (2,351,322)530,383,166 
Issuance of shares 6,398,733 (1)6,398,732  (1,197,438)5,201,294 
        
Number of shares as of December 31, 2002 243,564,130 295,569,090 539,133,220  (3,548,760)535,584,460  243,564,130  295,569,090  539,133,220  (3,548,760) 535,584,460 
Issuance of shares 6,032,920 - - 6,032,920  (2,170,011)3,862,909  6,032,920   6,032,920  (2,170,011) 3,862,909 
        
Number of shares as of December 31, 2003 249,597,050 295,569,090 545,166,140  (5,718,771)539,447,369  249,597,050  295,569,090  545,166,140  (5,718,771) 539,447,369 
Issuance of shares - - 4,549,205  (2,388,111)2,161,094   4,549,205  4,549,205  (2,388,111) 2,161,094 
        
Number of shares as of December 31, 2004 249,597,050 300,118,295 549,715,345  (8,106,882)541,608,463  249,597,050  300,118,295  549,715,345  (8,106,882) 541,608,463 
        
Issuance of shares   5,582,936  5,582,936  (5,572,500) 10,436 
       
Number of shares as of December 31, 2005  249,597,050  305,701,231  555,298,281  (13,679,382) 541,618,899 
       

     The capital may be increased only by a decision taken at a shareholders’ meeting in connection with the capitalization of profits or reserves previously allocated to capital increases at a shareholders’ meeting.

F - 44


BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

     The preferred shares are non-voting except under limited circumstances and are entitled to a minimum preferential non-cumulative dividend of 6% of the capital value per share or, as from 2002, 3% of the net book value per share, whichever is greater. Also the preferred shares have priority over the common shares in the case of liquidation of the Company. Under Brazilian Corporation Law, the number of non-voting shares or shares with limited voting rights, such as the preferred shares, may not exceed two-thirds of the total number of shares.

b. Treasury stock

     Treasury shares are derived from two separate events:

     The merger of CRT

     The Company is holding in treasury preferred stock resulting from the conversion into its own stock of treasury stock of CRT acquired by that company in the first half of 1998. Since the merger, of CRT into Brasil Telecom S.A., the Company has only placed shares in circulation to comply with court rulings in favor of potential subscribers of shares of the merged company.

     The average acquisition cost of CRT was R$1.24 per share. With the swap ratio of the stock as a result of the merger process, each CRT share was swapped for 48.565 shares of Brasil Telecom S.A., resulting in an average cost of R$0.026 for each treasury share.

F - 53


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

     The movements of treasury stock derived from the merged company were the following:

2003 2004 20042005 
Preferred shares (thousands) Amount Preferred shares (thousands) Amount Preferred shares
(thousands)
Amount Preferred shares
(thousands)
Amount 
Opening balance 1,567,960 38,977 871,571 20,778 871,571 20,778 1,282 30 
Number of shares replaced in circulation (696,389)(18,199)(870,289)(20,748)(870,289)(20,748)
Closing balance 871,571 20,778 1,282 30 1,282 30 1,282 30 

     The retained earnings account represents the origin of the funds invested in acquiring the stock held in treasury.

The Stock Repurchase Program - From 2002 to 2004

     The Company’s Board of Directors approved, as publicly disclosed as a relevant fact on September 13, 2004 (as required by CVM), the proposals to a preferred stock repurchase programs, under the following terms and conditions: (i) the share subscription premium account would be the origin of the funds invested in purchasing the stock; (ii) the authorized limit for repurchase was limited to 10% of preferred shares outstanding in the market; and (iii) the period determined for the acquisition was 365 days, in accordance with CVM Instruction 390/03.

F - 45


BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

     The movement of shares held in treasury arising from the programs for repurchase of shares was the following:

 2003 2004 
Preferred shares (in thousand) Value Preferred shares (in thousand) Value 
Balance at the beginning of the year 1,980,800 21,852 4,847,200    54,870 
Number of shares acquired 2,866,400 33,018 3,258,400    37,550 
Balance at the end of the year 4,847,200 54,870 8,105,600    92,420 

2004 2005 
Preferred shares
(in thousand)
Value Preferred shares
(in thousand)
Value 
Balance at the beginning of the year 4,847,200  54,870 8,105,600 92,420 
Number of shares acquired 3,258,400  37,550 5,572,500 62,272 
Balance at the end of the year 8,105,600  92,420 13,678,100 154,692 
Historical unit cost of repurchase
of treasury shares (R$)
2003 2004 2004 2005 
Average 11.32 11.40 11.40 11.31 
Minimum 10.31 10.31 
Maximum 13.80 13.80 

     The acquisition unit cost considers the total cost for the stock repurchase programs.

     None of the preferred stocks acquired were sold up to the 20042005 balance sheet date.

c. Capital Reserves

     Reserve for Share Subscription Premium

     This reserve arose from the difference between the amount paid on subscription and the value of the corresponding capital.

     Special GoodwillReserve

     The Special Goodwill Reserve represents the net value of the contra entry of the goodwill recorded as deferred charges as provided by CVM Instructions 319/99, 320/99 and 349/01,. Each year an amount of the reserve, corresponding to the realized tax benefit, may be capitalized to the benefit of the controlling shareholder, by the issue of new shares. Minority shareholders are ensured the right to preference, in proportion to their respective holdings in type and class of shares, and the consideration for such acquisitions as they choose to make, will be paid to the controlling shareholder in accordance with the terms of CVM Instructions 319/99. On March 27, 2002, March 17, 2003 and March 18, 2004, the Board of Directors, approved capital increases of R$39,591, R$37,327 and R$28,148, respectively, corresponding to the 2001, 2002 and 2003 realized portion of the tax benefit.

Reserve forDonations and Subsidies for Investments

F - 54


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

     This reserve relates to donations and subsidies received, corresponding to assets received by the Company.

     Reserve for Special Monetary Restatement as per Law 8.200/91

     This reserve arose out of an additional price-level restatement adjustment recorded in order to compensate for understatements of the monetary restatement indices used prior to 1990.

F - 46


BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

     Other CapitalReserves

     These reserves arose out of the accounting methodologies used for recording interest on work in progress up to December 31, 1998 and the benefits arising from funds channeled into income tax incentives that would otherwise have been payable as income taxes.

d. Income Reserves

     Legal Reserve

     A Brazilian company is required to appropriate 5% of annual net income to a legal reserve until that reserve equals 20% of paid-up share capital or 30% of paid-up share capital plus capital reserves; thereafter, appropriations to this reserve are not compulsory. The legal reserve can only be used to increase capital or to offset accumulated losses.

     Retained Earnings

     This reserve comprises the remaining balances of net income, adjusted under the terms of article 202 of Law 6.404/76, or by the recognition of prior years adjustments, when applicableapplicable.

e.Dividends and interest on Shareholders’ Equity

     Pursuant to its by-laws and Brazilian Corporation Law, the Company is required to distribute as dividends in respect of each fiscal year ending December 31, to the extent amounts are available for distribution, an aggregate amount equal to at least 25% of Adjusted Net Income on such date. Under Brazilian Corporation Law, the definition of Adjusted Net Income is as follows: statutory net income reduced by amounts allocated to legal reserve, unrealized profits reserve (if any) and contingency reserve (if any), and increased by the realized portion of the unrealized profits reserve and by any reversals of the reserve for contingencies. The annual dividend distributed to holders of preferred shares (the “Preferred Dividend”) has priority in the allocation of Adjusted Net Income, as mentioned in Note 26.a above. Remaining amounts to be distributed are allocated first to the payment of a dividend to holders of common shares in an amount equal to the Preferred Dividend and the remainder is distributed equally among holders of preferred shares and common shares.

     Brazilian corporations may make payments to shareholders characterized as interest on shareholders’ equity (the “JSCP”). The rate of interest may not be higher than the Federal Government’s long-term interest rate (the “TJLP”) as determined by the Central Bank from time to time. The Company elected to characterize dividends for 20032004 and 20042005 as JSCP. This is a deductible expense for income tax purposes, but is treated as dividends for accounting purposes and is deducted from compulsory dividends, net of withholding income tax.

F - 4755


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

     The calculation of Adjusted Net Income and the determination of the mandatory minimum dividends in accordance with Brazilian Corporation Law and the Company’s by-laws are shown in the table below:

         2003  2004   2004  2005 
         
Income/(Loss) for the year          (507,435)  98,840  98,840  (303,671)
Adjustments necessary to reach net income (loss) on a Brazilian     
Adjustments necessary to reach net income (loss)on a Brazilian Adjustments necessary to reach net income (loss)on a Brazilian  
Corporation Law basis          482,133  189,712  189,712  
Goodwill amortization (Corporation Law basis)          124,014  124,014  124,014  113,679 
Transfer to legal reserve          - -  (14,428)  (14,428) 
         
Adjusted Net Income          98,712  398,138  398,138  (189,992)
         
Minimum dividends - 25%          24,678  99,535  99,535  
         

Interest on shareholders’ equity - JSCP

     The Company credited Interest on Shareholders’ Equity to its shareholders according to the stock position on the date of each credit made during the financial year. The JSCP Interest on Shareholders’ Equity was allocated to dividends, net of withholding tax, on the closing date of the financial year, as a proposal for approval by the general shareholders’ meeting.

2003 2004 2004 2005 
INTEREST ON SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (JSCP) CREDITED TO SHAREHOLDERS 246,200 444,500 444,500 626,500 
WITHHOLDING TAX (IRRF) (36,930) (66,675) (66,675)(93,975)
JSCP, NET 209,270 377,825 377,825 532,525 
COMMON STOCK 96,013 174,469 174,469 245,406 
PREFERRED STOCK 113,257 203,356 203,356 287,119 

TOTAL REMUNERATION PER THOUSAND SHARES (IN REAIS)(1) 2003 2004 2004 2005 
COMMON 0.384672 0.699001 0.699001 0.983210 
PREFERRED 0.390743 0.696398 0.696398 0.983210 
TOTAL SHARES 0.387934 0.697598 0.697598 0.983210 

(1)     The dividends/Interest on Shareholders’ Equity calculation, per thousand shares, takes into consideration the outstanding shares at year end. The difference per type of shares presented is due to different outstanding shares breakdowns at the date of the credit of Interest on Shareholders’ Equity and as of December 31, 2004.2005. Nevertheless, the remuneration per type of shares is the same in each date of credit.

     Total remuneration for the shareholders in 20042005 and 20032004 is based on the distribution of interest on Shareholders’ Equity (JSCP), the value of which net of withholding tax exceeded the amount of the compulsory dividend, and also exceeded the amount of the priority dividend and dividend on common stock calculated under equal conditions.

27. Expansion plan contributions

     Expansion plan contributions were the means by which Brazilian telecommunication companies financed the growth of their telecommunications network up to July 1997.

F - 48


BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

     Contributions were made by companies or individuals wishing to be connected to the national telephone network. The Companies’ expansion plan contribution program was

F - 56


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

terminated, with no new contracts being signed after June 30, 1997. The R$7,974 remaining balance as of December 31, 20032004 and 2004,2005, presented within “other non-current liabilities” in the consolidated balance sheet, arose from plans realized before termination, the corresponding net assets of which are already included in the Company’s fixed assets through the Community Expansion Plan. The Company must await final court decisions arising from lawsuits filed by interested parties before the corresponding shares can be issued.

28. Transactions with related parties

     Transactions with related parties refer to transactions with the parent company, Brasil Telecom Participações S.A.

     Transactions between the Company and related parties are carried out on an arms-length basis. The principal transactions are:

a.Brasil Telecom Participações S.A.

Dividends and Interest on Shareholders’ Equity - JSCP

     R$294,395 (162,425421,001 (294,395 in 2003)2004) of the dividends credited in 20042005 were allocated to the parent company. As of December 31, 2004,2005, the remaining balance of dividends payable amounted to R$220,708 (R$250,236 (R$138,062 as of December 31, 2003)2004).

Loans

     This liability, which arose from the intercompany balances that existed at the time of the Telebrás spin-off, is indexed to the US dollar exchange variation and bears interest at 1.75% per year and amounted to R$74,52358,798 at December 31, 2004 (R$89,65374,523 in 2003)2004). The charge to financial expenses amounted to a gain of R$4,8207,258 in 20042005 (R$18,9654,820 of gain in 20032004 and R$44,59118,965 of loss in 2002)2003).

Debentures

     On January 27, 2001, the Company issued 1,300 private non-convertible debentures, at a unit price of R$1,000, in the total amount of R$1,300,000, for the purpose of funding part of its investment program. The entire issue of debentures was acquired by Brasil Telecom Participações S.A.

     The face value of these debentures will be amortized in two installmentsone installment equivalent to 30% and 40%, with maturity on July 27, 2005 and 2006, respectively.2006. The remuneration of the debentures is equivalent to 100% of the CDI inter-bank deposit rate, paid semiannually. As of December 31, 2004,2005, the liability is R$560,459 (R$972,006 (R$1,408,190 in 2003)2004) and charges recognized in expenses for 20042005 amount to R$134,923 (R$175,956 (R$in 2004 and R$286,911 in 20032003).

Sureties and R$236,356Guarantees

     The Company renders sureties as guarantee of loans and financings owed by the Company to the lending financial institutions. In 2005, referring to the guarantee benefit, the Company recorded expenses in 2002).favor of the Parent Company at the amount of R$ 2,483 (R$ 3,964 in 2004)

F - 4957


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

     The Parent Company rendered surety for the Company related to the contracting of insurance policies, guarantees of contractual liabilities (GOC) for 2005, which amounted to R$ 217,142. In 2005, in return to such surety, the Company returned to the Parent Company a quarterly remuneration of R$ 65, representing an annual expense of R$ 260 (R$ 279 thousand in 2004).

AccountsReceivableRevenues and Accounts PayableReceivable

     The balances arise from transactions related to operating income and expense for use of installations and logistical support. As of December 31, 2004,2005, the payable balance amounted to R$54 (R$184 (R$157 in 2003)2004) and the amounts recorded in the statements of operations were: Operating income: R$4,291 (R$2,933 (R$in 2004 and R$2,301 in 20032003).

b.BrT Serviços de Internet S.A.

     Amounts Receivable and Payable, Revenues and Expenses: arising from transactions related to the use of facilities, logistic support and telecommunications services. The balance receivable is R$ 23,126 (R$ 3,757 receivable on 12/31/04). The amounts recorded in income for 2005 represented R$ 66,027 of the operating revenues (R$ 55,008 in 2004) and R$2,352 172,611 of operating expenses (R$ 152,680 in 2002)2004).

c.14 Brasil Telecom Celular S.A

     Revenues, Expenses and Amounts Receivable: arising from transactions related to the use of facilities, logistic support and telecommunications services. The balance receivable is R$ 1,680 (R$ 5,858 receivable, on 12/31/04). The amounts recorded in income for 2005 represented R$ 174,375 of the operating revenues (R$ 15,250 in 2004) and R$ 238,026 of operating expenses (R$ 14,148 in 2004).

d.Vant Telecomunicações S.A.

     Accounts Payable, Revenues and Expenses: arising from transactions related to telecommunications services. The balance payable is R$ 320 (R$ 1,208 payable on 12/31/04) and the amounts recorded in income represented R$ 1,910 of operating revenues (R$ 1,154 in 2004) and R$ 1,858 of operating expenses (R$ 2,157 in 2004).

e.BrT SCS Bermuda

     Revenues and Amounts Receivable: arising from transactions related to telecommunications services. The balance receivable is R$ 201. The amounts recorded in income for 2005 represented R$ 201 of operating revenues.

     Loans: on 12/31/04 there was a loan agreement granted in U.S. dollar, with an interest rate of 3% p.a., settled in January 2005. The balance of this assets on 12/31/04 was R$ 88,619. The financial revenue until the loan settlement date was R$ 961 (the financial expenses in 2004, motivated by the drop of the U.S. dollar was R$ 2,313).

F - 58


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

f.Freelance S.A.

     Revenues and Accounts Receivable: arising from transactions related to the use of telecommunications services. The receivable balance amounts to R$ 769 (R$ 54 receivable on 12/31/04) the recognized revenue in income was R$ 776 (R$ 233 in 2004).

g.IG Brasil

     Revenues and Accounts Receivable: arising from transactions related to the use of telecommunications services. The balance receivable is R$ 733 (R$ 1,720 receivable on 12/31/04) and the revenue recognized in the income was R$ 10,672 (R$ 860 in 2004) and operating expenses R$ 71.

h.BrT Multimídia

     Accounts Payable, Revenues and Expenses: arising from transactions related to telecommunications services. The balance payable is R$ 10,772 (R$ 15,918 payable on 12/31/04). The amounts recorded in income for 2005 represented Operating Revenues of R$ 169 (R$ 15 in 2004) and Operating expenses:Expenses of R$256 66,711 (R$ 47,130 in 2002.2004).

i.Other Related Parties Transactions

     Due to the existence of common partners in the control chain of the Company and the Companies mentioned below, the operations among them may be classified, pursuant to CVM Resolution #26/86, as “related-parties transactions”.

  • Telemig Celular:The Company and Telemig Celular maintain agreements related to the operations of telecommunications services, comprising CSP 14 – Operator Selection Code, infrastructure rental and co-billing agreements. The amount receivable, resulting from these contracts and agreements is R$ 4,228 (R$ 13,121 in 2004). The amounts recorded in income for 2005 are represented by operating revenues of R$ 151 (R$ 276 in 2004) and operating expenses of R$ 32,979 (R$ 27,102 in 2004).
  • Amazônia Celular:The Company and Amazônia Celular maintain an agreement concerning operation of telecommunications services, comprising CSP 14 – Operator Selection Code and co-billing agreements. The amount receivable, resulting from these contracts and agreements is R$ 258 (R$ 2,748 in 2004). The amounts recorded in income for 2005 are represented by operating expenses of R$ 6,101 (R$ 9,236 in 2004).
  • TIM Celular: The Company and TIM’s cell phone companies maintain agreements concerning the operation of telecommunications services, comprising lease of means and co-billing agreements, as well as relationships resulting from CSP. The amount payable, resulting from these transactions is R$ 38,296. The amounts recorded in income for 2005 are represented by operating revenues of R$ 152,611 and operating expenses of R$ 516,048.

F - 59


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

  • Telecom Capital Fund:Based on the information made available to the management in December 2005, it was concluded that in 2003 the Company invested funds in Telecom Capital Fund (“TCF”), an investment fund created in Curacao, in the Netherlands Antilles, with the purpose of “obtaining return rates above the average with moderate risk to investors” by means of investments in “infrastructure in the Latin America focused on telecommunications, Internet and data applications”; As the single provider of the fund, the Company contributed with eighty-four million U.S. dollars (US$ 84,000,000.00) to enable an investment in promissory notes of MetroRED (US$ 41,000,000.00), subsequently used for conversion into shares, and of Highlake International Business Company Ltd. (“HIGHLAKE”) (US$ 43,000,000.00), by means of remuneration of the Libor rate plus 1.5% p.a., with option, to the debtor (HIGHLAKE), of payment and acquittance by conversion of the debt into shares. With this investment, HIGHLAKE acquired the interest held by Telesystem International Wireless Latin America (“TIW”) in the capital of Telpart Participações S.A., parent company of the holding companies Telemig Celular Participações S.A. and Tele Norte Celular Participações S.A. Concerning HIGHLAKE, we have noticed that its corporate structure is comprised by Opportunity Fund, with 95% of interest. In view of the interest of Opportunity Fund in the Company’s control chain, these operations may be classified, under the terms of the CVM Resolution # 26/86, as “related-parties transactions”. In March 2005, HIGHLAKE settled the promissory note held by TCF, without the conversion of the shares and subsequently the discontinuance of the Fund was requested. On 4/25/05 the balance of the fund quotas was redeemed, at the amount of R$ 137,976. In 2005, until the redemption date, the Company recorded a financial loss of R$ 640, motivated by the exchange loss variation of the U.S. dollar in the respective period. In 2004, due to same reasons, a financial loss of R$ 15,174 was recorded.
  • Supportcomm S.A.:The Company between 2001 and 2005 entered into five agreements with the company Supportcomm S.A. (“SUPPORTCOMM”) for the supply of material, platforms and technology services, at the total amount of R$ 59,585, out of which R$ 45,176 have already been paid. In analysis of the ownership structure of SUPPORTCOMM, a 30% interest of Megapart Participações was identified, a company which has Opportunity Fund as partner, with an interest of nearly 100%. In view of the interest of Opportunity Fund in the Company’s control chain, these operations may be classified, pursuant to CVM Resolution #26/86, as “related-parties transactions”.
  • Acquisition of IG Cayman Equity Interest:On July 26, 2005, the subsidiary BrT SCS Bermuda acquired 3,750,500 class A common shares and 6,249,848 class B common shares issued by IG Cayman. This equity interest was acquired from the shareholders Opportunity Fund, Vicência Participações Ltda. and Global Investments and Consulting. Inc., companies with common partners in the Company’s control chain. The amount of the acquisition, representing 25.6% of the capital stock of IG
    Cayman, corresponded to R$ 68,647.

29. Commitments

a. Capital expenditure

     At December 31, 2004,2005, the Company had capital expenditure commitments in the amount of R$358,798,311,656, which is expected to be invested during 2005.2006. These commitments are in

F - 60


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

relation to the continuing expansion and modernization of the Company’s plant, including transmission equipment, mobile equipment and data transmission equipment.

b. Services rendered due to acquisition of assets

     BrT SCS Bermuda acquired fixed assets from a third party company. Concurrently with the assets acquired, basically underwater cables, it assumed the obligation of providing data traffic services, initially contracted with the company that sold the assets, which was a beneficiary of the financial resources of the respective advances. The time remaining for the supplying of such assumed services is around nineteeneighteen years, which is the same period considered for the depreciation of such cables, within property, plant and equipment.

30. Insurance (not audited)

     The Company has insurance covering operational risks, loss of profit, guarantee on contractual commitments, comprehensive general liability (including officers’ liability), national and international cargo, vehicle and life. At December 31, 2004,2005, in the opinion of management, all significant and high-risk assets and obligations were insured.

     An insurance policy program is maintained for covering reversible assets, loss of profits and contract guarantees, as established in the Concession Contract with the government. Insurance expenses were R$ 12,448 (R$ 10,624 in 2004). The assets, responsibilities and interests covered by insurance are the following:

Type Coverage Amount Insured 
2004 2005 
Operating risks Buildings, machinery and equipment, facilities, call centers, towers, infrastructure and information technology equipment11,745,459 11,923,121 
Loss of profit Fixed expenses and net income 7,370,615 8,163,247 
Contract Guarantees Compliance with contractual obligations 120,870 214,142 
Civil Liability Telephone service operations 12,000 12,000 

     There is also insurance coverage for the management civil liability, supported in the policy of Brasil Telecom Participações S.A., extensive to the Parent Company and the Company ,and the total amount insured is equivalent to thirty million U.S. dollars.

     There is no insurance coverage for optional civil liability related to third party claims involving Company’s vehicles.

     The assumptions of adopted risks, given their nature, do not integrate the scope of a financial statement audit, consequently, they were not examined by our independent accountants.

31.Fairvalue of financial instruments and risk analysis

     The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instrument. The fair value estimates are made at a discrete point in time based on relevant market information and information about the financial instrument. Because no market exists for a significant portion of the Company’s financial instruments, fair value estimates are based on considerable management’s judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of the various financial instruments and other factors. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore cannot be determined with precision. The use of different

F - 61


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

assumptions for calculation of market value or fair value may have a material effect on the amounts obtained. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.

     The selection of assets and liabilities presented in this Note was made based on their materiality. Those instruments, the value of which approximates fair value and risk assessment is not considered significant by the Company, are not mentioned.

F - 50


BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

a. Fair Value of current assets and liabilities

     The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, trade accounts receivable, accounts payable and short-term financing approximates fair value due to the short maturity of these instruments.

b. Foreign currency loans and financing (primarily exchange rate risk)

     The Company has loans and financing contracted in foreign currency with risk related to the possibility of fluctuations in exchange rates which may increase the balance of these liabilities. Loans subject to this risk represent 25,6%23.3% of total loans and financing (5.1%(25.6% in 2003)2004). To protect it from foreign currency risk, the Company enters into currency swap contracts with financial institutions. Of its debts in foreign currency, 50,2%66.0% is covered by swap contracts agreements (30%(50.2% in 2003)2004).

     The book and market values of the foreign currency loans and financing and the swap contracts as of December 31, 20032004 and 20042005 was as follows:

2003 2004 2004 2005 
Book
Value
Market 
Value
 
Book   
Value
 
Market   
Value 
Book
Value
Market
Value 
 Book
Value 
Market
Value 
LIABILITIES   
Loans and financing 235,784 229,596 1,320,833 1,343,973 1,320,833 1,343,973 1,064,090 1,109,424 
Swap Contracts 9,809 4,920 87,190 74,985 87,190 74,985 311,469 301,119 
TOTAL 245,593 234,516 1,408,023 1,418,958 1,408,023 1,418,958 1,375,559 1,410,543 
Current 52,412 48,599 74,199 79,395 74,199 79,395 125,690 126,588 
Non-Current 193,181 185,917 1,333,824 1,339,563 1,333,824 1,339,563 1,249,869 1,283,955 

     The method used for calculation of the market value (fair value) of foreign currency loans and financing was the discounted cash flow method of the future cash flows of each agreement, using the market rates prevailing on the balance sheet dates.

     The fair value of the swap contracts was estimated using specific data available for these financial instruments, including using prices currently charged to enter into similar agreements, or discounting projected cash flows at market discount rates that reflect the credit, interest and foreign currency risk associated with these financial instruments.

c. Local currency loans and financing (primarily interest rate risk)

     The Company has loans and financing contracted in local currency, subject to interest linked to various reference rates (TJLP, UMBNDES, CDI, etc) with the risk of fluctuations in these rates. The Company has contracted derivative contracts to hedge 38% (79%22.7% (38% in 2003)2004) of the liabilities subject to the UMBNDES rate, using exchange rate swap contracts, considering the influence of the dollar on the basket of currencies within the UMBNDES interest rate. The other

F - 62


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

market rates are continually monitored to evaluate the need to contract derivatives to protect against the risk of volatility of these rates.

     In addition to its loans and financing, the Company issued non-convertible private and public debentures. These liabilities were contracted at interest rates tied to the CDI and the risk linked with this liability is the result of the possible increase in the rate.

F - 51


BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

     The aforementioned liabilities at the balance sheet date are as follows:

2003 2004 2004 2005 
Book
Value
Market   
Value
 
Book 
Value
 
Market   
Value
 
Book
Value
Market
Value 
Book
Value 
Market
Value 
LIABILITIES  LIABILITIES
Debentures - CDI 2,328,137 1,513,713 1,513,755 1,513,713 1,513,755 1,108,226 1,100,815 
Loans linked to TJLP 1,766,025 2,012,487 1,882,960 2,012,487 1,882,960 2,076,211 2,077,094 
Loans linked to UMBNDES 209,011 275,565 229,177 275,565 229,177 272,601 273,318 
Loans linked to IGPM 21,739 16,724 16,724 8,158 
Loans linked to IGDI 19,310 
Other loans 20,439 16,007 16,007 10,530 
Swap Contracts 44,895 3,239 38,979 13,920 38,979 13,920 37,630 27,462 
TOTAL 4,390,246 4,348,590 3,873,475 3,672,543 3,873,475 3,672,543 3,532,666 3,516,687 
Current 1,937,864 1,896,208 1,028,934 975,559 1,028,934 975,559 1,363,694 1,360,475 
Non-Current 2,452,382 2,844,541 2,696,984 2,844,541 2,696,984 2,168,972 2,156,212 

     Some market values are roughly equivalent to book values because the current contractual conditions for these types of financial instruments are similar to those in which they were originated. In case of a hypothetical variation of 1% in the aforementioned rates, unfavorable to the Company, the annual negative impact on income would be approximately R$9.7 million.

     The fair value of the swap contracts was estimated using specific data available for these financial instruments, including using prices currently charged to enter into similar agreements, or discounting projected cash flows at market discount rates that reflect the credit, interest associated with these financial instruments.

d. Credit Risk

     MostThe majority of services provided by the CompanyBrasil Telecom S.A. are related to the Concession ContractAgreement, and a significant portion of these services is subject to the determination of tariffsfees by the regulatory agency. The credit policy, in theits turn, in case of telecommunications public telecommunications services, is subject to legal rulesstandards established by the concession authority. The risk exists since the Company may incur losses arising from the difficulty in receiving amounts billed to its customers. In 2004,2005, the Company’s default was 3.22%2.91% of the gross revenue (2.68%(3.22% in 2003)2004). By means of internal controls, the level of accounts receivable is constantly monitored, by the Company, thus limiting the risk of past due accounts by cutting offthe access to the service (outgoing calls)(out phone traffic) if the bill is overdue for over 30 days. Exceptions are made for telephone services, thatwhich should be maintained for national security or safety.defense.

     The Company operates in co-billing, concerning long distance calls with the use of its CSP (Operator Selection Code) originated by subscribers of other fixed and mobile telephony operators. The co-billing accounts receivable are managed by these operators, based on the operational agreements entered into with them and according to the rules set forth by ANATEL. The blocking rules set forth by the regulating agency are the same for the fixed and mobile telephony companies, which are co-billing suppliers. The Company separately controls receivables of this nature and maintain an allowance for losses that may occur, due to the risks of not receiving such amounts.

     In relationrespect to the Mobile Services, themobile telephony, credit risk in cell phones sales of handsets and in service rendering in the postpaid servicescategory is minimized with the adoption of future clientsa credit granting analysis. Besides that,pre-analysis. Still in relation to the postpaid services, which represents 33.1% of total clients on December 31, 2004, accounts receivables are monitored in order to limit delinquency by cutting off access to the service (outgoing calls) if the bill is overdue for over 15 days.

F - 5263


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

postpaid service, whose client base at the end of the year was 31.3% (33.1% on 12/31/04), the receivable accounts are also monitored in order to limit default and the block is made to the service (out of phone traffic) if the bill is overdue for over fifteen days.

e. Cash InvestmentFinancial Investments Risks

     The company has temporary cashhigh-liquid investments in exclusive financial investment funds (FIFs), whose assets comprise federal securities based on post-fixed, pre-fixed and foreign exchange rates, all subject to CDI, by means of the own backing of these securities or through futures contracts traded at the Futures and Commodities Exchange - BM&F, exclusive financial investment funds (FIFs), subject to exchange variation through futures contracts in dollar with the Futures and Commodities Exchange - BM&F, overnight financial investments, in own portfolio of CDB issued by national financial institutions, and own portfolio of CD issued by financial institutions abroad. Overnight investments, in exchange fund and deposit certificates are subject to exchange rate fluctuation risks. The CDB investments, as well as overnight investments that have spread in this type of certificate, are subject to the issuing financial institution credit risk.

     The company maintains financial investments in exclusive financial investment funds (FIFs), in the amount of R$1,667,009 (R$2,326,497 (R$1,315,096 at December 31, 2003)2004), whose assets are constituted of floating federal securities, future contracts indexed to the exchange rate of the Futures and Commodities Exchange - BM&F and in an investment fund in foreign currency, with no credit risks in such operations. Income earned to the balance sheet date is recorded in financial income and amounts to R$246,493 (R$213,453 (R$151,076 in 2003)2004).

f. Risk of Not Linking Monetary Restatement Indexes of loans and financing to accounts receivable

     Loans and financing rates contracted by the Company are not correlated to amounts of accounts receivable. Consequently, a risk arises from this lack of correlation, since the telephony tariff adjustments do not necessarily follow increases in local interest rates, which affect the Company’s debts.

g. Risk of Anticipated Settlement of Loans and Financing

     Some of the loans and financing contracts signed by the Company with its creditors contain covenants that stipulate the advance payment of them in cases where minimum values for certain indicators are not achieved, such as indebtedness, liquidity, cash generation and others. The indicators required in these clauses, which are common in loan and financing transactions, were fully achieved by the Company as mentioned in Note 23.h.

     In order to adjust valuation parametersConsidering the provisions recognized in these present financial statements, provisions of which informed to the new realitymarket by means of the telecom segmentMaterial Fact as of 1/4/06, the Company renegotiated all the loan and hedge agreements that had financial covenants related to the Earnings before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA). These renegotiations were successfully concluded in February 2006, when all creditors agreed with the temporary adequacy of covenants and/or waiver.

     In the case of financing with direct and indirect on lending of BNDES, as provided for in the agreements, from the publication of the audited financial statements, there will be a future

F - 64


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

retention three times the amount of the highest falling due installment for the agreements with monthly amortization and once the highest amount of the falling due installment for the agreements with quarterly amortization. The total estimated retention amounts is approximately R$ 252,014, made operational through the partial block of the Company’s financial investments, without prejudice of the remuneration to be received by it. The release of the amount to be blocked will take place when the Company a renegotiationreturns to complying with the BNDES’ agents (private banks) took place during December 2004. These agents approvedfinancial relations set forth in the newagreements or it is successful in the renegotiation of financial covenants on December 20, 2004, with retrospective application to the whole year-ended on December 31, 2004, and submitted their acceptance to the BNDES, which accepted (with retroactive application) these new terms and conditions on February 1, 2005. The Company is, on 31 December 2004, in compliance with these revised covenants.negotiated.

h. Contingency Risks

     Contingency risks are assessed as probable, possible, or remote according to loss hypotheses. Contingencies considered as probable risk are recorded. Details on this risk are presented in Note 24

i. Regulatory Risk

i.     
For conducting its business, the Companies are fully dependent upon the fixed-line telecommunications concession as granted by the Federal Government, as mentioned in Note 1.a. On June 20, 2003, ANATEL enacted Resolution 341, which provides for new types of concession contracts, effective from January 1, 2006 until 2025. The form of New Concession Contract provides for changes in the way in which rates are set, for example, the General Price Index - Internal Availability,Índice Geral de Preços - Disponibilidade Interna(IGP-DI), will be changed to a mix of existing prices indexes (under the terms of regulation) to determine the annual inflation-based adjustments to rates. Consequently, the operations and competitive position of the Company may be affected by these changes.

i.New Concession Agreements:

On 12/22/05, new local and domestic long distance concession agreements were entered into by Brasil Telecom S.A., which shall be take effect between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2025. These new concession agreements, which provide for reviews on a five-year basis, in general have a higher intervention level in the management of the businesses and several provisions defending the consumer’s interest, as noticed by the regulation body.

The main highlights are:
  • The burden of the concession defined as 2% of the net revenue from taxes, calculated every two years, starting in 2006 fiscal year, whose initial payment incurs on 4/30/07 and then successively until the end of the concession. This calculation method, concerning accrual, corresponds to 1% for each fiscal year;
  • The definition of new universalization targets, particularly AICE – Special Class Individual Access, of mandatory offer and the Telecommunications Service Centers - PST, with full burden for the Concessionaire;
  • The possibility of the Regulating Agency to impose mandatory alternative plans;
  • The introduction of Regulating Agency’s right to intervene and modify agreements of the concessionaire with third parties;
  • The inclusion of assets of the parent company, subsidiary, affiliated companies and third parties, indispensable to the concession, as reversible assets;
  • The creation of the Users’ Board in each concession;

Additionally, the regulation connected to the new concession agreement provides for changes in the local calls tariff system, which change from pulse to minute in the regular hours, in amounts of the public tariffs and in the readjustment criteria, which had the individual excursion factor reduced from 9% to 5% and will be then defined by a sector index - IST, in which composition the highest weight is IPCA.

ANATEL, on February 23, 2006, edited the Resolution 432, postponing for a twelvemonth period the dates mentioned in Rule 423, as of 12/6/05, which deals with the Amendment to the Tariff System of STFC Basic Plan in the Local Modality Rendered under Public Scheme, bound by the new local concession agreement. Among other

F - 5365


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

ii.     Since the Company received certification of its compliance with the 2003 targets established by ANATEL, it have begun offering national and international fixed-line services as well as mobile services. If Telecom Italia International N.V. (“TII”) were to reacquire an indirect controlling interest in the Company, the Company and TIM Brasil Serviços e Participações S.A. (“TIM”) would be deemed affiliates under Brazilian telecommunications law, and the ability to offer national and international fixed line services as well as mobile services in the same regions as TIM would be at risk of being terminated by ANATEL. On January 16, 2004 ANATEL issued an Act pursuant to which ANATEL consented to an 18 month period during which TII may reacquire an indirect controlling interest in the Company, provided TII does not participate or vote in any matters related to the overlapping services offered by the Company and TIM such as national long distance fixed line services as well as mobile services. If, after the 18- month period (expiring July 18, 2005), the Company and Telecom Italia did not reach an agreement which resolved the overlap, ANATEL reserved the right to impose sanctions on any or all involved parties. Depending on ANATEL’s final decision, these sanctions could have a material adverse effect on the business and operations of the Company.
As mentioned in note 32.iv, on April 28,2005, TII and TIM and the Company and BrT Celular entered into a Merger Agreement and a related Protocol. Among other things this transaction allows the Company to settle the overlapping of licenses and authorizations with TIM so as to avoid potential sanctions and penalties to be imposed by ANATEL. The merger is currently subject to various judicial injunctions issued in Brazil and in the United States. At the moment, it is not possible to foresee the outcome of such injunctions. Occurring or not the merger described above, there is a possibility that some or all of the assets related to the mobile segment (see note 34.c) will be impaired, either as a result of the overlapping of operations or sanctions from ANATEL. At the moment, it is not possible to foresee the outcome of such injunctions.

postponements, it forbids the implementation of tariff system by minute in basic plans of STFC concessionaries in local modality on date prior to March 1, 2007.

On their turn, the interconnection tariffs, as provided for, are then defined as a percentage public tariff until the implementation of cost model by service/modality, estimated for 2008, as defined in the Regulation for Separation and Accounting Allocation (Resolution 396/05).

Consequently, the operations and the competitive position of the Subsidiary may be affected by effects to derive from new concession agreements. Nevertheless, it is not possible to assess, on the date these financial statements were prepared, the future impacts to be generated by such changes.

ii.Legislative Bill of Change in Telecommunications Act (“LGT”)

On March 6, 2006, the President of Brazil sent to the Brazilian Congress a legislative bill to amend LGT 9,472, as of 7/16/97. The amendment proposed specifically deals with the adoption of distinctive criteria considering the user’s social-economic condition, with a view to ensuring access to telecommunication services. Said project still depends on approval. Currently, the subsidiary Brasil Telecom S.A. cannot access the effects resulting from such initiative to its businesses, should said project obtain approval at the Brazilian Congress.

iii.Overlapping of Licenses

     When the Company received the certification for achieving the universalization targets for 2003, set forth by ANATEL, it already provided the fixed telephony service (“STFC”) in the local and domestic long distance modalities (“LDN”) intra-regional in the Region II of the General Concession Plan (“PGO”). After achieving the referred targets, ANATEL, in January 2004, issued authorizations that increase the possibility of Company’s operation: Local STFC and LDN in the Regions I and III of the PGO (and a few sectors of the Region II); International Long Distance (“LDI”) in the Regions I, II and III of the PGO; mobile telephony, by means of the subsidiary 14 Brasil Telecom Celular S.A. (“BrT Celular”), in the Region II of the Personal Mobile Service (“SMP”). The already existing concession agreements were expanded, enabling LDN calls to any part of the Brazilian territory. If Telecom Italia International N.V. (“TII”) acquired an indirect controlling interest in the Company, the Company and TIM Brasil Serviços e Participações S.A. (“TIM”) could be considered affiliates under the new Brazilian telecommunications legislation. That would imply the ability of providing domestic (LDN) and international (LDI) fixed and mobile telephony services throughout the same regions of TIM’s, would be subject to risk of being partially closed by ANATEL. On January 16, 2004, ANATEL issued the Act #41,780 establishing an 18-month period for TII to reacquire an indirect controlling interest in the Company, as long as TII did not participate or vote on issues related to the overlapping of services offered by the Company and TIM, such as domestic and international long-distance and mobile services. On June 30, 2004, The Administrative Council of Economic Defense – CADE, in the records of the Write of Prevention 08700.000018/2004 -68, set forth restrictions to the exercise of the control rights on the part of Telecom Italia International N.V. and its representatives at the board of directors of Solpart Participações S.A., Brasil Telecom Participações S.A. and Brasil Telecom S.A.
j. Labor union

F - 66


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

     Approximately 25.2%25.1% of our employees are affiliated employees of the unions, legal representatives of the category, that are affiliated to the following federations: FENATTEL - Federação Nacional dos Trabalhadores em Telecomunicações (National Federation of Telecommunications Workers), or FITTEL - Federação Interestadual dos Trabalhadores em Telecomunicações (Interstate Federation of Telecommunications Workers).

     The base date of the category is December, time in which the salary losses for the period are negotiated, with basis on the accrued INPC index from December to November of the immediately preceding year.

     The economic clauses are negotiated annually, while the social clauses are negotiated every 2 years.

     Management understands that there is no concentration of available sources of labor, services, concessions or rights, other than those mentioned above, that could, if suddenly eliminated, severely impact the Companies’ operations.

F - 5467


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

32. Subsequent events

Material Facts

As required by CVM, the company and its parent company, Brasil Telecom Participações S.A., together released material facts, which dates and texts were as follow:

(i)     
March 10, 2005: “International Equity Investments Inc., as the sole shareholder of CVC/Opportunity Equity Partners LP (CVC LP), on the night of March 9, 2005, sent a notice informing about the ousting of CVC/Opportunity Equity Partners, Ltd. (“CVC Ltd.”) from the management of CVC LP, having designated as a substitute, a new company incorporated abroad, at an undisclosed date, named Citigroup Venture Capital International Brazil LLC (“CVC International Brazil”). It was also informed that CVC International Brazil entered into, at an unknown date and terms, “shareholders´ agreements with Investidores Institucionais Fundo de Investimento em Ações, Caixa de Previdência dos Funcionários do Banco do Brasil - Previ, Fundação dos Economiários Federais - Funcef and Petros - Fundação Petrobras de Seguridade Social” which, according to the notice, have full force and effect conditioned to the occurrence of certain undisclosed conditions, among which the implementation of the designation of CVC International Brazil as the new manager of CVC LP. CVC LP holds direct and indirect investments in Brasil Telecom Participações S.A. and Brasil Telecom S.A.”
(ii)     
March 17. 2005: “on March 17, 2005, they became aware that the United States District Court - Southern District of New York granted a preliminary injunction determining that CVC/Opportunity Equity Partners, Ltd. file before the competent authorities of the Cayman Islands its substitution as general partner of CVC/Opportunity Equity Partners, L.P.
CVC/Opportunity Equity Partners, L.P. is a limited partnership, duly incorporated in Cayman Islands, that holds a stake in Brasil Telecom Participações S.A. and Opportunity Zain S.A., a company which integrates the controlling corporate structure of Brasil Telecom Participações S.A. and Brasil Telecom S.A.”
(iii)     March 19, 2005: “on March 18, 2005, they took notice that CVC/Opportunity Equity Partners, Ltd. filed a formal statement before the competent authorities of Cayman Islands in which it informs its substitution as general partner of CVC/Opportunity Equity Partners, L.P., in light of the appointment of Citigroup Venture Capital International Brazil, LLC as the new manager of CVC/Opportunity Equity Partners, L.P.”
(iv)April 28, 2005: “announce that TIM International N.V. (“TIMINT”) and TIM Brasil Serviços e Participações S.A. (“TIMB”) (collectively referred to as “TIM Group”) on one side and Brasil Telecom S.A. (“BrT”) and 14 Brasil Telecom Celular S.A. (“BTC”) (“collectively referred to “Brasil Telecom”) on the other side entered into a Merger Agreement and a Merger Justification Protocol with respect to the merger of BTC into TIMB.

(i)March 16, 2006: “On April 28, 2005, still under the management appointed by the Opportunity Group, Brasil Telecom and its subsidiary, 14 Brasil Telecom Celular S.A. (“BTC”) celebrated with TIM International N.V. (“TIMI”) and TIM Brasil Serviços e Participações S.A. (“TIMB”) several agreements, including a contract entitled “Merger Agreement” (“Acordo de Incorporação”) and a “Protocol” associated to it. According to material facts disclosed by the Company, the merger was forbidden by injunctions rendered by the Brazilian and American Courts of Law, in lawsuits filed by its controlling shareholders. Brasil Telecom’s understanding is that the Merger Agreement and its respective Protocol were celebrated, among other grounds, in conflict of interest, violation of the law and the Company’s By-Laws and, still, in breach of shareholders’ agreements and lacking the necessary corporate approvals. Furthermore, the current management considers that such agreements are contrary to the Company’s best interests, specifically regarding its mobile telephony business. Thus, based on the Merger Agreement itself, Brasil Telecom and BTC began an arbitration process on March 15, 2006 against TIMI and TIMB to declare the nullity or to obtain the annulment of the referred agreement. Such arbitration shall be governed by the rules of the International Chamber of Commerce (Câmara de Comércio Internacional).”

(ii)March 20, 2006: “BRASIL TELECOM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. and BRASIL TELECOM S.A., based on art. 157 of Law 6,404/76, and CVM Instruction 358/02, hereby discloses to the market a decision rendered by the United States District Court of the Southern District of New York on March 16, 2006, as transcribed below:

“UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
- -------------------------------------------------- x
INTERNATIONAL EQUITY INVESTMENTS, INC.
and CITIGROUP VENTURE CAPITAL
INTERNATIONAL BRAZIL, LLC, on behalf of itself05 Civ. 2745 (LAK)
and Citigroup Venture Capital International Brazil, L.P.
(f.k.a. CVC/Opportunity Equity Partners, L.P.),
Plaintiffs,
v.
OPPORTUNITY EQUITY PARTNERS, LTD.
(f.k.a. CVC/Opportunity Equity Partners, Ltd.) and
DANIEL VALENTE DANTAS,
Defendants.
- -------------------------------------------------- x
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WITH TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
     Upon consideration of the Affidavit of Carmine D. Bocuzzi in support of Plaintiffs’ Order to Show Cause, sworn to March 15, 2006, and the exhibits thereto, the Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for a

F - 5568


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

This transaction allows Brasil Telecom Group to settle, on a business manner, the overlapping of regulatory licensesPreliminary Injunction and authorizations among Brasil Telecom and TIM Group arising from ANATEL’s Act No. 41,780 dated January 16, 2004, published in the Official Gazette dated January 19, 2004, and also preventing ANATEL from imposing severe sanctions and penalties.

BTC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of BrT and holds authorizations to exploit mobile services in Lots 4, 5 and 6 of Region II under the General Licensing Plan and the relevant radiofrequencies of sub-bands “E”. BTC’s commercial operation begun in September 2004. After 8 months of full commercial operation, BTC reached over 1.000.000 clients.

TIMINT is the controlling shareholder of TIMB, which, in turn, is the direct or indirect controlling shareholder of certain companies that hold mobile services and domestic and international long distance authorizations in Regions I, II and III under the General Licensing Plan. TIM Group has approximately 14.6 million clients.

The closing of this transaction will result in other material benefits to the Brasil Telecom Group, such as:

(1) Maintenance of Brasil Telecom Group’s valuable and unique clients’ base through proposals of national coverage and added value services, with focus in convergence;

(2) Merger of the mobile operations of both BTC and TIMB;

(3) BrT’s participation in the shareholding structure of TIMB;

(4) Execution of a national roaming services agreement between BTC and TIMB, as well as the facilitation for the entering into international roaming services agreements for the benefit of BTC with companies/partners of TIM Group outside of Brazil, in order to allow the increase of coverage for the clients and the reduction of investments for the existing network’s capacity increase;

(5) Substantial increase of scale and revenues of the Brasil Telecom Group through TIM Group’s use of Brasil Telecom Group’s long distance services;

(6) Elimination of new capital expenses as well as initial losses relating to the mobile operations;

(7) Increase of Brasil Telecom’s Group commercial presence’s capillarity in TIM Group’s sales/distribution points;

(8) Equal competition possibilities between Brasil Telecom Group and other players in the rendering of national coverage services within the Brazilian telecommunications market; and

(9) Final solution of all pending claims among entities of the Brasil Telecom Group and the Telecom Italia Group.

F - 56


BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

The appraisals to determine the intrinsic equity value of each of BTC and TIMB, to define the value of TIMB’s capital increase, will be prepared by a top-tier financial institution of international reputation selected by BrT.

Closing of this transaction is subject to usual conditions precedent for transactions of similar nature and legal requirements, including the approval of ANATEL. Brasil Telecom Group will keep its shareholders and the market in general informed about any material fact regarding this transaction.

The Brasil Telecom Group reinforces its positioning in the telecommunications market.”

     With the merger, the superimposed licenses will be given back to ANATEL. The completion of this instrument is subject to the internal approvals of Brasil Telecom S.A., as well as ANATEL.

     Occurring or not the merger described above, there is a possibility that some or all of the assets related to the mobile segment (see note 34.c) will be impaired, either as a result of the overlapping of operations or sanctions from ANATEL. At this moment, it is not possible to foresee possible effects in the Companies' financial statements, resulting from the consummation of this agreement.

(v)     April 29, 2005: “they took notice that Techold Participações S.A. (“Techold”), alongside Timepart Participações Ltda. (“Timpepart”) and Telecom Itália International N.V. (“Telecom Italia”), as shareholders of Solpart Participações S.A. (“Solpart”), company which controls, directly, BTP, and, indirectly, BrT and 14 Brasil Telecom Celular S.A. (“BTC”) (BTC, in conjunction with BTP and BrT, hereafter denominated “Brasil Telecom Group”), entered into an Agreement on April 28, 2005, seeking the reestablishment of Telecom Italia’s original position in the controlling group of Brasil Telecom Group, condition which was temporarily suspended until pertinent regulatory issues were resolved, through the restoration of political rights and the repurchase of the shareholding interest sold to Techold and Timepart in August of 2002. On April 29, 2005, a copy of the 2nd Amendment to the Shareholders’ Agreement Consolidated on August 27, 2002 was filed at the headquarters of BrT and BTP.
The aforementioned notice informs that Techold and Telecom Italia converted the totality of their preferred shares issued by Solpart into voting shares on April 28, 2005, pursuant to the bylaws of Solpart. Telecom Italia will nominate members of the Board of Directors of Solpart, BTP and BT, in accordance with the abovementioned shareholders’ agreement. This agreement was reached considering that the Merger Agreement and the Merger’s Protocol entered into with TIM Brasil Serviços e Participações S.A. (“TIM Brasil”) allow for the removal of legal issues that obstructed the restoration of Telecom Italia’s right of returning to the controlling group of Brasil Telecom Group.
Techold, Timepart, Solpart, BTP, and BrT entered into an Agreement ending lawsuits and disputes between the companies, including reciprocal settlements, with respect to the return of Telecom Italia to the controlling group of Brasil Telecom Group.
Brasil Telecom Group is to keep its shareholders and the general public informed about any material facts concerning current developments.”

F - 57


BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

(vi)     April 29, 2005: “announce that, according to the agreement entered into by Techold Participações S.A. (“Techold”), Timepart Participações Ltda. (“Timepart”) and Telecom Italia International N.V. (“Telecom Italia”), Solpart Participações S.A. (“Solpart”), which directly controls the Company, presents the following ownership structure:
Solpart’s Total Capital
Techold Participações S.A. 61.98% 
Telecom Italia International N.V. 38.00% 
Timepart Participações S.A. 0.02% ” 

(vii)     May 5, 2005: “they took notice of a Temporary Restraining Order effective until hearings to take place on May 9, 2005, granted by the Federal Court of the Southern District of New York, NY – USA, in the Amended Complaint filed by International Equity Investments Inc., Citigroup Venture Capital International Brazil LLC and Citigroup Venture Capital International Brazil L.P. against Opportunity Equity Partners Ltd. and Daniel Valente Dantas (“Defendants”), as reproduced below:
“United States District Courts
Southern District of New York
International Equity Investments, Inc. and Citigroup Venture Capital International
Brazil LLC on behalf of itself and Citigroup Venture Capital International Brazil,
L.P. (f.k.a. CVC/Opportunity Equity Partners, L.P.),

Plaintiffs,

V.

Opportunity Equity Partners, Ltd. (f.k.a. CVC/Opportunity Equity Partners, Ltd.)and Daniel Valente Dantas,

F - 58


BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

Defendants.


05 Civ. 2745 (LAK)

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CONTEMPT, EXPEDITED DISCOVERY AND A PRELIMINARY
INJUCTION WITH A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

Upon consideration of the attached Amended Complaint (the “Amended Complaint”) of the International Equity Investments, Inc. and Citigroup Venture Capital International Brazil LLC(“CVC Brazil”) on behalf of itself and Citigroup Venture Capital International, Brazil, L.P. (the “CVC Fund”); the Affidavit of Carmine D. Boccuzzi in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Contempt, Expedited Discovery and Injunctive Relief sworn to May 3, 2005; the Declaration of ChristopherJohn Brougharn, QC dated May 3, 2005; the Declaration of Paulo Caldeira in Support of Plaintiff’s Application for a Temporary Restraining Order, and a Preliminary Injunctionthe Declaration of Flavio Galdino dated March 10, 2005;15, 2006 and the Memorandumexhibits thereto, the Declaration of LawJohn Christopher Brougham, O.C. dated March 15, 2006, and the record in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motionthis case, and after hearing consent for Contempt, Expedited Discovery and A Preliminary Injunction with a Temporary Restraining Order,both sides, it is hereby:


ORDERED that defendants Opportunity Equity Partners Ltd. (“Opportunity”) and DanielValenteDaniel Valente Dantas (“Dantas”) SHOW CAUSE before this Court in Courtroom 12D of the United States Courthouse located at 500 Pearl Street, in the borough of Manhattan, City and State of New York, on the 9th28 day of May 2005,March 2006, at 2:30 p.m.10:00 a.m., why an Order should not be made and entered herein, (in the form annexed hereto), pursuant to Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

(i) finding defendants Dantas and Opportunity to be in violation of this Court’s March 17, 2005 Preliminary Injunction by (i) seeking to consummate, or causing to occur, a transaction that would, inter alia, (a) impair the value of the CVC Fund or its assets or interfere with plaintiffs’ control over those assets; and (b) interfere with the authority and power of CVC Brazil, the newly-appointed general partner of the CVC Fund, over the assets, investments and management of the CVC Fund; and (ii) documenting any transaction with or benefiting any defendant, directly or indirectly; and

F - 59


BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

(ii)Procedure, enjoining defendants Dantas and Opportunity, and their direct and indirect subsidiaries and all related and affiliated entities, persons, corporations, officers, agents, servants, employees, privies, assigns, and attorneys, or any of the foregoing under either of defendants’ direct or indirect control, direction, permission or license or acting in concert with one or both defendants, and all those persons in active concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this Order by personal service or otherwise, (1) from executing, enforcing or performingotherwise giving effect to any obligation under any agreement referenced or discussed in, or relatedprovision of the Amendment to the agreements referenced or discussed in, the Brasil Telecom Material FactAmended and Restated Shareholders’ Agreement dated April 28, 2005 and/or the Telecom Italia Press Release dated April 28, 2004, attached as Exhibits K and L to the Bocuzzi Affidavit submitted herewithof September 12, 2003 (the “Agreements”“Umbrella Agreement”), or taking any other transaction, that impairs the value of any assets directly or indirectly held by the CVC Fund or involves or resultsaction in the transfer of any assets of Brasil Telecom Participações, S.A. or Brasil Telecom, S.A.; and (2) from entering into any transaction involving any entity in which the CVC Fund has a direct or indirect interest that is not in the ordinary course of business; and

(iii) ordering expedited discovery, beginning upon issuance of this Order, of defendants concerning all aspectsfurtherance of the Agreements and any related transactions, including but not limited to the negotiations leading up to those transactions and the parties' motives for entering into them.

foregoing.
Sufficient reason being alleged, it is hereby:

hereby
ORDERED that, pending the hearing ofa further Order by this motion,Court, defendants Dantas and Opportunity, and their direct and indirect subsidiaries and all related and affiliated entities, persons, corporations, officers, agents, servants, employees, privies, assigns, and attorneys, or any of the foregoing under either of defendants' direct or indirect control, direction, permission or license or acting in concert with one or both defendants, and all those persons in active concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this Order by personal service or otherwise, are restrained (1)enjoined from executing, enforcing or performingotherwise giving effect to any obligation underprovision of the Agreements,Umbrella Agreement, or taking any other transaction, that impairsaction in furtherance of the value of any assets directly or indirectly held by the CVC Fund or involves or results in the transfer of any assets of Brasil Telecom Participações S.A. or Brasil Telecom S.A.; and (2) from entering into any transaction involving any entity in which the CVC Fund has a direct or indirect interest that is not in the ordinary course of business;"foregoing; and it is further

ORDERED that service by hand of a copy of this Order and the papers upon which it is based on counsel for defendants, Boies, Schiller & Flexner no later than May 4, 2005, shall be deemed good and sufficient; and it is further


ORDERED that answering papers, if any, shall be filed and served electronically or by hand upon plaintiffs'plaintiffs’ attorneys, Howard S. Zelbo, Esq., Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, One Liberty Plaza, New York, New York 10006, on or before May 6th, 2005;March 22, 2006 by 1 p.m.; and it is further

                    ORDERED that reply papers, if any, shall be filed and served electronically or by hand upon defendants’ attorneys on or before March 24, 2006 at 1 p.m.
          SO ORDERED.
Dated: New York, New York
March 16, 2006
Issued at 11:50 a.m.
Lewis A. Kaplan
“United States District Judge”

     (iii)May 2, 2006: “BRASIL TELECOM PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. and BRASIL TELECOM S.A. (hereinafter jointly referred to as “Brasil Telecom Group”), in compliance with article 157 of Law 6,404/76 and Instruction 358/02 from the CVM - Comissão de Valores Mobiliários (Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commission), announce that a letter was received via fax, dated May 2, 2006, signed by TIM International N.V. (“TIMINT”) and TIM Brasil Serviços e Participações S.A. (“TIMB”). According to this letter, Brasil Telecom S.A. and 14 Brasil Telecom Celular S.A. (hereinafter jointly referred to as “Companies”), were informed about the termination of the “Merger Agreement” entered into on April 28, 2005 among the Companies, TIMINT and TIMB. On the same letter, TIMINT and TIMB reserve their alleged rights under sections 10.3 and 11.1 of the “Merger Agreement”. The “Merger Agreement” is part of an arbitration process implemented by the Companies against TIMINT and TIMB, according to Material Fact disclosed on March 16, 2006. The Brasil Telecom Group

F - 6069


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

ORDERED that reply papers, if any, shall be filedreassures its commitment to keep its high standards of transparency and served electronically or by hand upon
     defendants' attorneys on or before May 9, 2005,corporate governance, as well as to continue to value its investors, clients, employees and partners.”

Retention of Cash and Cash Equivalents

As from April 11, 2006 Banco do Brasil made retentions in the morning.investment funds accounts, integrating the high-liquid investments of Brasil Telecom S.A. and Freelance S.A., in the amounts of R$ 91,439 and R$100,000, respectively, resulting in the consolidated retained amount of R$ 191,439. The retention arises from the non-compliance with certain financial indices set forth in the financing agreements that Brasil Telecom S.A. maintains with BNDES, as mentioned in note 23.h. The retained amount will be normally remunerated while it remains in this status. The release will take place from the moment that the Company resets the financial indices defined in the agreements entered into with BNDES.

SO ORDERED.New Loans

Dated:   New York, New York 5/04/2005     In the Board of Directors’ Meeting of Brasil Telecom S.A. held on June 5, 2006 were approved unanimously by the votes rendered the 5th Issuance, being the 4th Public Issuance, of simple, nominative, non-convertible debentures, (the “Debentures”, the “Issuance”), being the 1st issuance made in the context of the Company’s 1st Securities Distribution Program, in the total amount of R$ 1,080,000,000.00.

Thomas Griesa
United States District Judge”

(viii)     May 10, 2005: “announce that, per request of Investidores Institucionais Fundo de Investimentos em Ações, Judge Alexander Macedo of the 8th Business Court of the Capital District of Rio de Janeiro, upon consideration of Judicial Proceeding 2005.001.051.781-7, ordered the following:
“I hereby GRANT THE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, AS REQUESTED ON ITEMS (I) AND (II) OF THE INITIAL PETITION, WHICH SHALL HAVE EFFECT UNTIL HEARINGS DESIGNATED HEREAFTER TAKE PLACE TO (i) suspend the validity of all acts, whether corporate or contractual, or of any other nature, that seek or have an effect on, directly or indirectly, the implementation of the merger or sale under any agreement of BTC by TIM BRASIL or by any other legal entity of the Telecom Italia Group; (ii) prohibit the accomplishment of any extraordinary managerial act, including but limited to the disposal or sale of any kind, to any party, of any asset of Brasil Telecom and BTC, so as to maintain undamaged its operations, identity, license, and value, without the prior consent and pronouncement of the controlling shareholders.
Ihereby impose the penalty of a daily fine, in case of violation of terms set forth herein, on defendants Opportunity Fund and Opportunity Lógica, on defendants that are members of the Telecom Italia Group and on the members of its Board of Directors and Senior Management, in the order of R$20,000,000.00 (twenty million reais), for the violation of any of the dispositions aforementioned, with no loss to the adoption of other measures for the return of the status quo ante.
Ihereby designate a special hearing to be held on May 24, 2005, at 3:30 p.m., to be attended by all involved parties or their respective attorneys-in-fact, with powers to transact.”
Brasil Telecom is taking all legal measures to present its reasoning before the court and revoke the preliminary injunction, taking into consideration the major benefits that the transaction would bring to its operations.”

F - 61


BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

(ix)     May 16, 2005: “announce that, per request of Fundação Vale do Rio Doce de Seguridade Social - Valia, Judge Alexander Macedo of the 8th Business Court of Rio de Janeiro, upon consideration of Judicial Proceeding 2005.001.055962-9, ordered the following:
“I hereby GRANT THE INJUNCTION, AS REQUESTED ON ITEMS (I) AND (II) OF THE INITIAL COMPLAINT, that is, to suspend the Board of Directors meetings of Brasil Telecom Participações S.A. and Brasil Telecom S.A., scheduled for May 12, 2005, prohibiting its opening and consummation, as well as any other Board of Directors meetings of the companies that include on their respective agendas the approval of the merger agreement or contracts deriving from it, including indemnification agreements for executives, before a General Meeting of Shareholders of Brasil Telecom Participações S.A. is held, ensuring the political rights of preferred shareholders.
I hereby notify defendants that the consummation of any of the aforementioned meetings shall be deemed as noncompliance with judicial order, without prejudice to imposing a fine of R$50,000,000.00 (fifty million reais), for the violation of any of the instructions aforementioned.”
Brasil Telecom is taking all legal measures to present its reasoning before the court and revoke the preliminary injunction, taking into consideration the major benefits that the transaction would bring to its activities.”
(x)  June 03, 2005: “they were informed of the following:
“Citigroup Venture Capital International Brazil, L.P. (“CVC Fund”) informs that the District Judge of the United States District Court of the Southern District of New York, on the record of the action brought by International Equity Investments, Inc., Citigroup Venture Capital International Brazil, LLC and the CVC Fund (“Plaintiffs”) against Opportunity Equity Partners and Mr. Daniel Valente Dantas (“Defendants”), granted, on June 02, 2005, a preliminary injunction determining that the Defendants, the officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys of each of the Defendants, and those persons in active concert or participation with either of the Defendants who receive actual notice of this order by personal service or otherwise, are enjoined and restrained, pending the determination of the abovementioned action, from:
(i) executing, enforcing, consummating, performing any obligation under, or otherwise giving effect to the following Agreements (as defined in the text of the Order): “Cellular Acquisition Agreement” and accompanying Protocol; the “Second Amendment to the Solpart Shareholders Agreement”, the “Solpart Master Agreement”, the settlement agreement between Telecom Italia, on the one hand, and Techold and Timepart, on the other, and the related Private Agreement Instrument and Transaction submitted in the original Portuguese as Exhibits H and I, respectively, of the “May 17, 2005 Hibshoosh Declaration”; and in English translation as Exhibits D and E, respectively, of the “June 1, 2005 Hibshoosh Declaration”;

F - 62


BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

(ii)     

entering into any transaction or any agreement that is not in the ordinary course of business (including any amendment to the “Solpart Shareholders Agreement” or any other shareholders' agreement) involving any entity in which the CVC Fund has a direct or indirect interest,

(iii)

taking any action in furtherance of the foregoing.”

The disputes among shareholders of Solpart including with respect to the ownership structure of Solpart, and management of entities which hold a stake in     Brasil Telecom Participações S.A., which controls the Company, will guarantee the Debentures, through personal guarantee (fiança). The issuance date is predicted to June 1st , 2006 with term of seven (7) years from the Issuance Date and Opportunity Zain S.A., a company which integrateswill mature on June 1st, 2013.

     The unit face value of each Debenture shall be amortized in accordance with the controlling corporate structure of Brasil Telecom Participações S.A.following schedule: (i) R$ 3,330.00 (33.3%) on June 1st, 2011; (ii) R$ 3,330.00 (33.3%) on June 1st, 2012; and Brasil Telecom S.A may result in changes to our board and/or senior management. These disputes do not change these financial statements.(iii) R$ 3,340.00 (33.4%) on June 1st, 2013.

Credit of Interest on Shareholders’ Equity - JSCP

April 20, 2005: Management     The remuneration of the Debentures shall be established by the Company, decided on April 20, 2005,through resolution made by delegationthe Company’s Senior Management, which shall ratify the bookbuilding process, subject to a maximum rate of 104.30% (one hundred and four and thirty one-hundredths percent) of the Board of Directors in a meeting held on March 29, 2005, to pay Interest on Shareholders’ Equity in the amount of R$240,100 (R$204,085 net of withholding tax - IRRF)IDC (Interbank Deposit Certificate). The date determined for the recording in the accounting of the interest is April 20, 2005. The Interest on Shareholders’ Equity can be imputed to the dividends for 2005 and they will be subject to the shareholders’ general meeting to be held in 2006, which will decide the date of payment.

33. Summary of the differences between Brazilian GAAP and U.S. GAAP

     The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Brazilian generally accepted accounting principles (“Brazilian GAAP”), which differ in certain significant respects from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”).

     The following is a summary of the significant policies and adjustments to net income (loss) and shareholders’ equity required when reconciling such amounts recorded in the consolidated financial statements to the corresponding amounts in accordance with U.S. GAAP, considering the significant differences between Brazilian GAAP and U.S. GAAP:

F - 70


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

a.Different criteria for capitalizing and amortizing capitalized interest

     Until December 31, 1993, capitalized interest was not added to the individual assets in property, plant and equipment; instead, it was capitalized separately and amortized over a time period different from the estimated useful lives of the related assets. Under U.S. GAAP, capitalized interest is added to the individual assets and is amortized over their estimated useful lives.

     Also, under Brazilian GAAP, as applied to companies in the telecommunications industry, interest attributable to construction-in-progress was calculated, up to December 31, 1998, at the rate of 12% per annum of the balance of construction-in-progress and that part which related to interest on third party loans was credited to interest expense based on actual interest costs with the balance relating to self-funding being credited to capital reserves. Starting 1999, Brazilian GAAP required capitalization of interest on loans specifically related to financing of construction in progress, and interest on self-financing is no longer allowed.

F - 6371


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

     Under U.S. GAAP, in accordance with the provisions of Statements of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) 34, “Capitalization of Interest Cost,” interest incurred on borrowings is capitalized to the extent that borrowings do not exceed the balances of construction-in-progress. The credit is a reduction of interest expense. Under U.S. GAAP, the amount of interest capitalized excludes the monetary gain associated with the borrowings and the foreign exchange gains and losses on foreign currency borrowings.

     The effects of these different criteria for capitalizing and amortizing capitalized interest are as follows:

 Year ended December 31 
  Year ended December 31 
 2002  2003   2004  
    2003  2004   2005 
   
Capitalized Interest difference
            
U.S. GAAP Capitalized Interest:             
Interest which would have been capitalized and credited to             
income under U.S. GAAP (Interest accrued on loans, except             
in periods when total loans exceeded total construction-in-             
progress, when capitalized interest was reduced             
proportionately)  280,026  113,926  80,863  113,926  80,863  59,955 
Accumulated capitalized interest on disposals   (22,667)  (184,666)  (39,742)  (184,666) (39,742) (9,537)
      
 257,359  (70,740)  41,121  (70,740) 41,121  50,418 
      
Less Brazilian GAAP Capitalized Interest:             
Interest capitalized and credited to income under Brazilian             
GAAP (Up to the limit of interest incurred on loans obtained             
for financing capital investments)  (127,979)   (61,330)     (9,043)   (61,330)    (9,043) (17,861)
Accumulated capitalized interest on disposals  39,337  281,706  57,891  281,706  57,891  13,274 
      
Total capitalized interest under Brazilian GAAP   (88,642)  220,376  48,848  220,376  48,848  (4,587)
      
U.S. GAAP Difference  168,717  149,636  89,969  149,636  89,969  45,831 
      
Amortization of capitalized interest difference             
Amortization under Brazilian GAAP  228,111  230,485  213,644  230,485  213,644  171,101 
Less: Amortization under U.S. GAAP  (140,645)  (154,500)  (150,049)  (154,500) (150,049) (124,664)
Difference in accumulated amortization on disposals   (22,551)  (136,097)  (29,967)  (136,097) (29,967) (5,674)
      
U.S. GAAP Difference  64,915  (60,113)  33,628  (60,113) 33,628  40,763 
      

b.Dividends and interest on shareholders’ equity

     Although under Brazilian Corporation Law proposed dividends require approval at a shareholders’ meeting, under Brazilian Corporation Law they are accrued for in the consolidated financial statements in anticipation of their approval by the shareholders’ meeting. Distributions characterized as interest on shareholders’ equity as well as minimum compulsory dividends are accrued for under both Brazilian and US GAAP. Any excess of proposed dividends over either the minimum compulsory dividend or distributions characterized as interest on shareholders’ equity would not be accrued for under US GAAP, if such proposed dividends is subject to approval at the annual Shareholders’ Meeting. There was no such excess in 2002, 2003, 2004 or 2004.2005.

F - 6472


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

c.Pensions and other post-retirement benefits

     Refer to Note 34.a for a discussion of differences between Brazilian GAAP and U.S. GAAP as they relate to pensions and other post-retirement benefits. For purposes of the U.S. GAAP reconciliation, the provisions of SFAS 87, “Employers’ Accounting for Pensions” (“SFAS 87”) and SFAS 106, “Employers’ Accounting for Post-retirement Benefits Other than Pensions” (“SFAS 106”) have been applied. The provisions of SFAS 87 were applied with effect from January 1, 1992 because it was not feasible to apply them from the effective date specified in the standard. As a result, R$292,131 of the transition liability was transferred directly to shareholders’ equity at the implementation date.

     Under Brazilian GAAP, the Company adopted CVM Deliberation 371 during the year ended December 31, 2001 and recorded an adjustment to opening shareholders’ equity amounting to R$328,381, net of R$162,362, which was recorded as deferred income tax on provision for pension. This adjustment was reversed for U.S. GAAP purposes, since all effects of pensions and other post-retirement benefits have already been recognized after applying SFAS 87 and SFAS 106.

     For U.S. GAAP purposes, unrecognized net gain or losses are recognized following the “corridor” approach, i.e., the portion which exceeds 10 percent of the greater of the projected benefit obligation or the market-related value of plan assets is recognized. This approach has not been applied for Brazilian GAAP purposes.

d.Items recorded directly in shareholders’ equity accounts

     Under Brazilian GAAP, some items are recorded directly in shareholders’ equity, which under U.S. GAAP would be recorded in the statements of operations, such as fiscal incentives in regional funds converted into shares or capital quotas of telecommunication companies, detailed in item (l) and tax incentives that are granted to the Company and became effective immediately.

e.Earnings (losses) per share

     Under Brazilian GAAP, net income (loss) per share is calculated on the number of shares outstanding at the balance sheet date. In these financial statements, information is disclosed per lot of one thousand shares, because generally this is the minimum number of shares that can be traded on the Brazilian stock exchanges. Each American Depositary Share (“ADS”) is equivalent to 3,000 shares.

     As determined by SFAS 128, “Earnings Per Share”, since the preferred and common stockholders have different dividend, voting and liquidation rights, basic and diluted earnings per share have been calculated using the “two-class” method. The “two-class” method is an earnings allocation formula that determines earnings per share for preferred and common stock according to the dividends to be paid as required by the Company’s by-laws.

     Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Net income available to preferred shareholders is the sum of the preferred stock dividends (a minimum of 6% of preferred capital, or, as from 2002, 3% per annum calculated on the amount resulting from dividing the net book shareholders’ equity by the total number of Company shares, whichever is greater, as defined in the Company’s by-laws) and the preferred shareholders’ portion of undistributed net income. Undistributed net income is computed by deducting total dividends (the sum of preferred and common stock dividends) from adjusted net income. Undistributed net income is shared equally by the preferred and common shareholders on a pro

F - 73


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

rata basis. Total dividends are calculated as described in Note 26.e. Diluted earnings per share is computed by increasing the number of shares, calculated by dividing the value of funds for capitalization and stock options, as mentioned below, by the equivalent value of the shares at the merger date.

F - 6574


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

     The weighted-average number of common shares used in computing basic earnings per share as of December 31, 20042005 was 249,597,048249,597,048,000 (248,591,563,000 in 20032004 and 241,964,447248,591,563,000 in 2002)2003). The weighted-average number of preferred shares used in computing basic earnings per share as of December 31, 2005 was 304,305,497,000 (292,068,167,000 in 2004 was 292,068,167,000 (291,839,496,000and 291,839,496,000 in 2003 and 292,319,690,000 in 2002)2003). The Company has received certain contributions from customers or customers have independently paid suppliers of telecommunication equipment and services for the installation of fixed line services. These amounts are reflected as “funds for capitalization” within other non-current liabilities in the accompanying balance sheets. Once the installation is essentially complete and the contributions have been received, the funds will be converted into equity (see Note 27). The shares are treated as outstanding and included in the basic EPS calculation only when such funds are converted to equity and the shares issued. The shares are treated as outstanding for diluted EPS purposes when expansion plan contributions are received or when Community Expansion Plan agreements have been approved. Additionally, the 1,415,119 (907,469410,737 (1,415,119 in 2003)2004) thousand preferred stock options granted under the stock option program for officers and employees mentioned in Note 25.b were considered in the calculation of the diluted earnings per share.

     If the Company is able to pay dividends in excess of the minimum requirement for preferred shareholders and the remainder of the net income is sufficient to provide equal dividends to both common and preferred shareholders, then the basic and the diluted earnings per share will be the same for both common and preferred shareholders.

     The Company’s preferred shares are non-voting except under certain limited circumstances and are entitled to a preferential non-cumulative dividend and to priority over the common shares in the event of liquidation of the Company. In 2002, 2003, 2004 e 2004,2005, the amount of dividends paid to the preferred shareholders exceeded the minimum guaranteed dividends, and was equal to the amount paid to the common shareholders.

f.Disclosure requirements

     U.S. GAAP disclosure requirements differ from those required by Brazilian GAAP. However, in these consolidated financial statements, the level of disclosure has been expanded to comply with U.S. GAAP.

g.Income taxes

     The Company fully accrues for deferred income taxes on temporary differences between tax and reporting records. The existing policies for accounting for deferred taxes are substantially in accordance with SFAS 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“SFAS 109”).

     Under SFAS 109, the provisional measures, which are temporary measures used by the Government to determine changes in tax rates, are not considered to be enacted law. In 2001, the enacted social contribution rate was 8% and an additional of rate of 1%, which was only enacted in 2002 (when the rate was increased to 9%), was considered for Brazilian GAAP purposes. Therefore, the reconciliation of the differences between Brazilian GAAP and U. S. GAAP include the effect of this change in 2002.

F - 6675


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

     Under US GAAP, if a valuation allowance is recognized for a deferred tax asset at the acquisition date, recognized benefits for those tax deductions after this date should be applied first to reduce to zero any goodwill related to that acquisition, second to reduce to zero other non-current intangible assets related to that acquisition, and third to reduce income tax expense. As described in note 9, in 2005, the Company ownsindirect subsidiary IG Brasil accomplished the necessary requirements set forth by CVM Instruction 371/02 and recorded in December deferred tax creditsassets on tax losses at the amount of R$ 50,330. Under US GAAP, the recognition of this benefit is accounted for as a reduction of the valuation allowance against goodwill. Thus, the change in the valuation allowance during the year was as follows:

Deferred tax valuation allowance as of December 31, 200233,178 
Increase in unrecognized tax losses of subsidiaries (BrT CSH and BrT CS Ltda.)2,269 
Deferred tax valuation allowance as of December 31, 200335,477 
Unrecognized tax losses on acquisitions (IG, VANT and BrT Multimídia)125,108 
Increase in unrecognized tax losses of subsidiaries (IG Brasil, VANT, BrT Multimídia, BrT CSH and BrT CS Ltda.)833 
Deferred tax valuation allowance as of December 31, 2004161,388 
Recognition of deferred tax assets applied to goodwill - IG Brasil (50,330)
 Increase in unrecognized tax losses of subsidiaries (VANT, BrT Multimídia, BrT CSH and BrT CS Ltda.)
18,358 
Deferred tax valuation allowance as of December 31, 2005129,416 

     Deferred tax assets on tax losses in the amount of R$161,388 which129,416 were not recognized as of December 31, 20042005 (that means, for US GAAP purposes, a valuation allowance has been recorded in the same amount), due to the lack of fulfillment of the minimum requirements regarding historical and forecasted taxable income for direct/indirect subsidiaries. These credits

     Subsequently recognized tax benefits relating to the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2005, will be subject to the requirements described above when utilized.allocated as follows:

Goodwill 74,778 
Income statement 54,638 
129,416 

h.Interest expense, interest income and accrued interest

     Brazilian GAAP requires interest expense and income, as well as other financial charges, to be shown as part of operating income (expense) and accrued interest as a part of loans and financing within liability balance. Under U.S. GAAP, interest expense and income, as well as

F - 76


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

other financial charges, would be shown after operating income (expense) within statements of operations and accrued interest would be included in accounts payable within the balance sheet.

i.Employees’ profit sharing

     Brazilian GAAP requires employees’ profit sharing to be shown as an appropriation of net income for the year. Under U.S. GAAP, employee profit sharing is included as an expense in arriving at operating income (expense).

j.Permanent assets

     Brazilian GAAP has a class of assets called permanent assets. This is the collective name for all assets on which indexation adjustments were calculated in the corporate and fiscal law accounts of Brazilian companies. Under U.S. GAAP, the assets in this classification would be non-current assets and property, plant and equipment. Gains and losses on the disposal of permanent assets are presented in Note 8. Such gains and losses are classified as non-operating expense for Brazilian GAAP. Under U.S. GAAP, such gains and losses would affect operating income (expense).

k.Price-level adjustments and U.S. GAAP presentation in respect of accounting periods through December 31, 2000

     The effects of price-level adjustments have not been eliminated in the reconciliation to U.S. GAAP, because the application of inflation restatement as measured by the IGP-M, applied until December 31, 2000 under Brazilian GAAP, represents a comprehensive measure of the effects of price level changes in the Brazilian economy and, as such, is considered a meaningful presentation for both Brazilian and U.S. accounting purposes.

     See the reconciliation of net income (loss) for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 and shareholders’ equity as at that date in accordance with Brazilian Corporation Law to net loss and shareholders’ equity in accordance with Brazilian GAAP reported herein in Note 2.b and a summary explanation of these 2 sets of Brazilian accounting principles in Note 2.a.

F - 6777


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

l.Funds for capitalization

i. Resources for capital increase and expansion plan contributions

     Under Brazilian GAAP, resources for capital increases and expansion plan contributions received are included in the balance sheet as non-current liabilities until the subscribers have paid for their telephone connection in full and a general meeting of shareholders approves the capital increases.

     Effective January 1, 1996, indexation of the expansion plan contributions was no longer applied and, for contracts signed as from that date, Telebrás (the former controlling shareholder) was allowed the option of using a value per share equal to the market value, when this was higher than book value. For U.S. GAAP purposes, a portion of the resources for capital increase and expansion plan contributions would be allocated to shareholders’ equity based on the market value of the shares to be issued to subscribers. The remainder of the resources for capital increase and expansion plan contributions would be classified as a deferred credit and amortized to reduce depreciation expense from the time the related construction-in-progress is completed.

ii. Donations and subsidies for investments

     Under Brazilian GAAP, those amounts which comprise principally the excess of the value of property, plant and equipment incorporated into the Company’s assets over the corresponding credits for expansion plan contributions received are recorded as a credit to other capital reserves. For U.S. GAAP purposes, the credit to capital reserves would be classified as a deferred credit and amortized to reduce depreciation expense.

m.Valuation of long-lived assets

     SFAS 144 provides a single accounting model for long-lived assets to be disposed of. SFAS 144 also changes the criteria for classifying an asset as held for sale; and broadens the scope of businesses to be disposed of that qualify for reporting as discontinued operations and changes the timing of recognizing losses on such operations. The Company adopted SFAS 144 on January 1, 2002. The adoption of SFAS 144 did not affect the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

     In accordance with SFAS 144, long-lived assets, such as property, plant, and equipment, and purchased intangibles subject to amortization, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. Assets to be disposed of would be separately presented in the balance sheet and reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell, and are no longer depreciated. The assets and liabilities of a disposed group classified as held for sale would be presented separately in the appropriate asset and liability sections of the balance sheet.

F - 6878


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

     Brazilian GAAP does not require the 2 steps approach to determine potential asset impairment, but requires measurement of recoverability for long-lived assets on a recurring basis or when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset or group of assets may not be recoverable. For all periods presented, no impairment losses were recognized under Brazilian GAAP and U.S. GAAP.

     Under Brazilian GAAP, impairment losses would be recorded as non-operating expenses. Under U.S. GAAP, impairment losses are recorded as operating expenses. Additionally, under Brazilian GAAP the gains (losses) on disposal of permanent assets and write-off of permanent assets due to obsolescence (as presented in Note 8) are considered a non-operating item, while under U.S. GAAP they are all considered operating expenses.

n.Stock options

     Under U.S. GAAP, the Company accounts for stock options in accordance with SFAS 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” which establishes a fair-value method of accounting for employee stock options or similar equity instruments. For US GAAP, the Black-Scholes option-pricing model was used to estimate the grant date fair value of its options granted. Under Brazilian GAAP, there is no requirement to account for stock options at fair value. The adjustment to reflect the difference in valuation basis between U.S. GAAP and Brazilian GAAP is as follows:

   First     
  Grant  Second Grant  Third Grant 
 
Number of options granted (in thousands) 622,364  308,033  507,650 
Fair value of option at date of grant(*) $0.00409  $0.00556  $0.00276 
Fair value of options granted at grant date  $2,542  $1,713  $ 1,400 

     The fair value of options is recognized over the expected vesting term of the option for US GAAP purposes, which is three years. An amount of R$1,2541,637 was recognized for U.S. GAAP purposes as stock option compensation expense (R$revenue (income of R$1,254 in 2004 and R$829 in 2003). No stock option compensation expense was recognized for Brazilian GAAP purposes.

     (*) The assumptions underlying the calculation of the fair value of the option are detailed in note 34.b.

o.Goodwill & other intangible assets and business combination

Goodwill & other intangible assets

     Under Brazilian GAAP goodwill represents the difference between historical book value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed and the purchase price, and it is amortized over the estimated period over which the Company expects to benefit from the goodwill. This period is determined based on the reasons attributed by management for the payment of goodwill. Impairment, if any, is measured to the extent that the unamortized balance of goodwill exceeds the expected future profits of the business.

F - 6979


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

     Under US GAAP, goodwill represents the excess of costs over fair value of net assets of businesses acquired. The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS 142,Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, as of January 1, 2002. Goodwill and intangible assets acquired in a purchase business combination and determined to have an indefinite useful life are not amortized, but instead tested for impairment at least annually in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 142. SFAS 142 also requires that intangible assets with estimable useful lives be amortized over their respective estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values, and reviewed for impairment in accordance with SFAS 144,Accounting for Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.

     In connection with SFAS 142’s transitional goodwill impairment evaluation, the Statement required the Company to perform an assessment of whether there was an indication that goodwill is impaired as of the date of adoption. To accomplish this, the Company was required to identify its reporting units and determine the carrying value of each reporting unit by assigning the assets and liabilities, including the existing goodwill and intangible assets, to those reporting units as of January 1, 2002. The Company was required to determine the fair value of each reporting unit and compare it to the carrying amount of the reporting unit within six months of January 1, 2002. To the extent the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeded the fair value of the reporting unit, the Company would be required to perform the second step of the transitional impairment test, as this would be an indication that the reporting unit goodwill may be impaired.

     Under the terms of the operating concessions granted by the Federal Government, the Company is obliged to provide a certain minimum level of services over the entire area covered by its fixed-line operating licenses. Also, the Company does not possess discrete financial information that could allow a determination of assets and liabilities (and goodwill) allocation in a level below the entire fixed-line business and neither does it manage different areas of the concession as if they were separate businesses and has thus considered the entire fixed-line business to be one reporting unit. In viewing all the fixed-line assets and liabilities of the Company as one reporting unit and performing an initial assessment on this reporting unit as to whether there was an indication that goodwill is impaired (based on a valuation performed by an independent third party), the second step of the transitional impairment test was not required. Consequently, the Company was not required to recognize an impairment loss.

     Prior to the adoption of SFAS 142, for US GAAP purposes goodwill was amortized on a straight-line basis over the expected periods to be benefited, and assessed for recoverability by determining whether the amortization of the goodwill balance over its remaining life could be recovered through undiscounted future operating cash flows of the acquired operation. All other intangible assets were amortized on a straight-line basis. The amount of goodwill and other intangible asset impairment, if any, was measured based on projected discounted future operating cash flows using a discount rate reflecting the Company’s average cost of funds.

     Under Brazilian GAAP, goodwill amortization is classified in operating or non-operating expenses, depending on its origin. Under U.S. GAAP, goodwill amortization was classified in operating expenses until December 31, 2001.

F - 7080


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

Business combinations

i)  Purchase of minority interests in the eight operating companies formerly held directly by Brasil Telecom Participações S.A.

i) Purchase of minority interests in the eight operating companies formerly held directly by Brasil Telecom Participações S.A.

     On February 28, 2000, Brasil Telecom Participações S.A. reorganized its investments in fixed-line telecommunication companies, by exchanging its shares in its eight smaller operating subsidiaries for newly issued shares of its main operating subsidiary, Telecomunicações do Paraná S.A. - TELEPAR. The minority shareholders of the smaller operating companies also exchanged their shares for newly issued shares of TELEPAR. These companies were then merged into TELEPAR. After the merger, the name of TELEPAR was changed to Brasil Telecom S.A.

     At the same date, in connection with the combination of the eight operating companies under common control with Telepar, the Company made an offer to exchange Telepar shares for the shares held by minority shareholders in each of the operating companies. The exchange was made based on the book value of the shares of Telepar compared to the book value of the shares of the operating companies. The book value of the shares was calculated by dividing stockholders’ equity by the number of shares outstanding. In the exchange offer, Telepar acquired almost 100% of the minority shares.

     Under U.S. GAAP, the purchase price of these shares must be calculated based on the traded market value of Telepar shares at the time of the exchange. The purchase price is then compared to the fair value of the assets and liabilities of each of the operating companies to determine goodwill. These differences, which were being amortized on the straight-line basis over five years for U.S. GAAP, but ceased in 2001, are summarized as follows:

Market value of the TELEPAR shares exchanged for minority interests  1,188,388 
Fair value of the minority interests exchanged   
 (which approximates book value) (1,161,690)
  
Goodwill as of January 31, 2000           26,698 
 Amortization of goodwill in 2000           (4,895)
  
 
Goodwill, net as of December 31, 2000           21,803 
Amortization of goodwill in 2001           (5,339)
  
Goodwill, net as of December 31, 2001           16,464 
  

ii) Purchase of controlling interest in CRT

     On July 31, 2000, the Company and Brasil Telecom Participações S.A., agreed to purchase all the outstanding shares of TBS Participações S.A. (TBS), the holding company of Companhia Riograndense de Telecomunicações (CRT), for R$1,499,760.Under U.S. GAAP, goodwill for this purchase is calculated at the difference between the fair value of the net assets purchased and the purchase price.

     Under Brazilian GAAP, goodwill for the purchase is calculated at the difference between historical book value of the assets and liabilities assumed and the purchase price. Also, as mentioned in Notes 9 and 18.a, goodwill under Brazilian GAAP was accounted for partially as a deferred tax asset which, for U.S. GAAP purposes, should be included as part of intangibles.

F - 7181


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

     The adjustments under U.S. GAAP to reflect the difference in depreciation and amortization resulting from the purchase price allocation differences explained above are as follows:

Net assets purchased under U.S. GAAP  483,030 
Adjustment to state fixed assets at fair value  (48,183)
  
Fair value of net assets purchased from CRT  434,847 
Purchase price  1,499,760 
  
Goodwill under U.S. GAAP  1,064,913 
Goodwill under Brazilian GAAP  820,547 
  
Difference in goodwill as of July 31, 2000  244,366 
  

Amortization of the difference of goodwill:   
   For the five months ended Dec. 31, 2000  (20,363)
   For 2001  (48,875)

Effect of depreciation related to the adjustment to state fixed
assets at fair value:
   For the five months ended Dec. 31, 2000  2,610 
   For 2001  6,264 
   For 2002  4,298 
   For 2003  4,712 
   For 2004  4,116 
   For 2005 3,532 

     For U.S. GAAP, the difference in goodwill was amortized, until 2001, on the straight-line basis over five years.

     The depreciation related to the adjustment to state fixed assets at fair value is being calculated at a rate per annum compatible with the fixed assets realization.

     Additionally, the amortization of the recomputed goodwill recognized in 2002, 2003, 2004 and 20042005 under BR GAAP, as mentioned in Note 18, in the amount of R$96,133, R$96,13366,590 and R$66,590102.716, respectively, has been reversed under US GAAP in connection with the adoption of SFAS 142.

iii) Purchase of minority interest in CRT

     On December 28, 2000, the Company exchanged its shares for the remaining outstanding shares of CRT. The exchange ratio was based on the market value of CRT shares and the market value of the Company’s shares at December 1, 2000. The purchase was recorded under Brazilian GAAP based on the book value of the CRT shares as of December 1, 2000, so no goodwill arose for Brazilian GAAP purposes.

F - 72


BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

     Under U.S. GAAP, the purchase price of the minority interest in CRT was determined based on the traded market value of Brasil Telecom shares as of December 1, 2000. U.S. GAAP also requires that this acquisition of the minority interest in CRT be recorded as of the transaction closing date, December 28, 2000. As discussed in (ii) above, there are also differences between U.S. GAAP and Brazilian GAAP in the allocation of the purchase price to the assets and liabilities acquired which result in a difference in depreciation and amortization expense. The adjustments to reflect the differences between U.S. GAAP and Brazilian GAAP discussed above are as follows:

F - 82


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

Book value of net assets purchased under U.S. GAAP  900,692 
Adjustment to fixed assets to reach fair value  (113,898)
  
Fair value of net assets purchased from CRT  786,794 
Market value of Brasil Telecom S.A. shares issued in exchange  948,927 
  
Goodwill under U.S. GAAP  162,133 
  
 
Net effect of recording transaction on December 28, 2000 rather   
than December 1, 2000  (6,453)
  
 
Amortization of goodwill for 2001  (32,427)
Reversal of depreciation for 2001  14,808 
  
  (17,619)
  
 
Reversal of depreciation for 2002  10,161 
  
Reversal of depreciation for 2003  10,539 
  
Reversal of depreciation for 2004  10,325 
 
Reversal of depreciation for 2005 8,349 
  

     For U.S. GAAP, the goodwill was amortized, until 2001, on the straight-line basis over five years. The depreciation related to the adjustment to state fixed assets at fair value is being calculated at a rate per annum compatible with the fixed assets realization.

iv) Step up in basis of companies under common control

     Under U.S. GAAP, Emerging Issues Task Force 90-5, “Exchanges of Ownership Interests between Entities under Common Control,” when an exchange of shares between companies under common control takes place, the parent company’s basis in the subsidiaries should be reflected (or “pushed down”) as the basis in the financial statements of the surviving entity. The parent company, which originally acquired the nine operating companies in the privatization auction (Solpart) in August 1998, recorded significant goodwill in that purchase. This goodwill, along with the step up in the basis of the fixed assets to fair value at the time of the purchase, results in an increase in the combined assets, as well as in shareholders’ equity of the Company of R$982,090 (R$589,630 of future profitability and R$392,460 of assets value). The increase in amortization and depreciation under U.S. GAAP for these assets was R$28,399,29,453, R$29,453 and28,861and R$28,861 23,333 during the years ended December 31 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2004,2005, respectively.

     For U.S. GAAP, the goodwill was amortized, until 2001, on the straight-line basis over five years. The depreciation related to the adjustment to state fixed assets at fair value is being calculated at a rate per annum compatible with the fixed assets realization.

F - 73


BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

v)Purchase of controlling interest in iBest

     On June 26, 2003, the Company purchased the remaining capital of 50,5% of iBest S/A and became owner of 100% of its capital share. The results of iBest operations have been included in the consolidated financial statements as from such date.

     The Company obtained third party valuation appraisal for the intangibles, as due to the nature of iBest business (free internet access), the greater part of its value is associated with intangibles. Below is the summary of the estimated fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date:

Net assets purchased under U.S. GAAP  June 26, 2003 
Current assets  40,103 
Non-current assets  7,323 
Investments  61 
Property, plant and equipment  2,948 
Customer List  11,572 
Trademark  67,043 
  
Total assets acquired  129,050 
  
 
Current liabilities  10,315 
Non-current liabilities  283 
Deferred taxes on intangible assets  26,729 
 
Total liabilities assumed  37,327 
 
Total purchase price (including R$10,000 for minority interests   
   owned previously)  157,045 
 
Goodwill under US GAAP  65,322 
 
Customer List Amortization:   
   2003  9,708 
   2004  1,604 
 
Reversal of Deferred Taxes Liabilities:   
   2003  3,301 
   2004  545 

F - 83


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

Net assets purchased under U.S. GAAP June 26, 2003
Current assets 40,103 
Non-current assets  7,323 
Investments  61 
Property, plant and equipment  2,948 
Customer List  11,572 
Trademark  67,043 
  
Total assets acquired  129,050 
  
 
Current liabilities  10,315 
Non-current liabilities  283 
Deferred taxes on intangible assets  26,729 
 
Total liabilities assumed  37,327 
 
Total purchase price (including R$10,000 for minority interests   
   owned previously) 157,045 
 
Goodwill under US GAAP  65,322 
 
Customer List Amortization:   
   2003  9,708 
   2004  1,604 
   2005  224 
 
Reversal of Deferred Taxes Liabilities:   
   2003  3,301 
   2004  545 
   2005  76 

     The Brazilian GAAP goodwill amounted to R$117,216 and has been amortized over the years proportionally to the profits generated by iBEST Group. The remaining balance as of December 31, 20042005 is R$74,833.49,102. Intangible assets consist of thecustomer list and trademark value.The amortization related to the customer list is being calculated at the estimated churn rate and the future free cash flow generated by the customer list existing at the acquisition date. Trademark and goodwill recognized in a purchase business combination and determined to have an indefinite useful life are not amortized, but instead tested for impairment at least annually in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 142. The amount of goodwill and intangible assets impairment, if any, was measured based on projected discounted future operating cash flows using a discount rate reflecting the Company’s average cost of funds. Under Brazilian GAAP, goodwill for the purchase is calculated at the difference between historical book value of the assets and liabilities assumed and the purchase price.

F - 74


BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

vi) Goodwill Group BrT Cabos Submarinos (GlobeNet)

     During the second quarter of 2003, BrTI invested, as shareholder or quotaholder, of the Group BrT Cabos Submarinos (formerly known as GlobeNet). This acquisition generated an insignificant goodwill, which is being amortized under Brazilian GAAP in five years, and has been reversed under US GAAP in connection with the adoption of SFAS 142.

vii) Purchase of controlling interest in MetroREDBrT Multimídia

F - 84


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

     On May 13, 2004, the Company purchased the remaining capital of 80.1% of MetroREDBrT Multimídia and became owner of 100% of its capital share. The results of MetroREDBrT Multimídia operations have been included in the consolidated financial statements as from such date.

     The Company obtained third party valuation appraisal for the intangibles, as due to the nature of MetroREDBrT Multimídia business (data communication services), the greater part of its value is associated with intangibles. Below is the summary of the estimated fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date:

Net assets purchased under U.S. GAAP  May 13, 2004  May 13, 2004 
Current assets  22,669  22,669 
Non-current assets  1,810  1,810 
Property, plant and equipment - Book Value  203,060  203,060 
Property, plant and equipment - Difference to Market Value  43,637  43,637 
Customer List  25,607  25,607 
Order Backlog List  18,810  18,810 
Trademark  4,261  4,261 
  
Total assets acquired  319,854  319,854 
  
Current liabilities  79,385  79,385 
Non-current liabilities  41,471  41,471 
Deferred taxes on intangible assets and difference to market value on PP&E  31,387  31,387 
  
Total liabilities assumed  152,243  152,243 
  
Total purchase price (including R$61,463 for minority interests     
owned previously)  226,408  226,408 
Goodwill under US GAAP  58,797  58,797 
Difference to Market Value on PP&E Depreciation:     
2004  3,713  3,713 
2005  4,430 
Customer List Amortization:     
2004  965  965 
2005  6,190 
Order Backlog List Amortization:     
2004  9,124  9,124 
2005  7,959 
Trademark Amortization:     
2004  3,455  3,455 
2005  1,793 
Reversal of Deferred Taxes Liabilities:     
2004  5,868  5,868 
2005  5,926 

F - 75


BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

     The Brazilian GAAP goodwill amounted to R$110,366 and has been amortized over theunder Brazilian GAAP in five years proportionally to the profits generated by MetroRED.. The remaining balance as of December 31, 20042005 is R$95,651.73,578. The difference to market value of property, plant and equipment is based on third party appraisal and is being depreciated at a rate per annum compatible with the fixed assets realization. Intangible assets consist of thecustomer list, order backlog list and trademark value.The amortization related to the customer list and order backlog list is being calculated at the estimated churn rate

F - 85


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

and the future free cash flow generated by the customer list and order backlog list existing at the acquisition date. The trademark is being amortized over a period of 12 months, equivalent to the period which its use was contracted. After this period, the Company will not be able to use the trademark “MetroRED”“BrT Multimídia” anymore. Goodwill recognized in a purchase business combination and determined to have an indefinite useful life are not amortized, but instead tested for impairment at least annually in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 142. The amount of goodwill impairment, if any, was measured based on projected discounted future operating cash flows using a discount rate reflecting the Company’s average cost of funds. Under Brazilian GAAP, goodwill for the purchase is calculated at the difference between historical book value of the assets and liabilities assumed and the purchase price.

viii)Purchase of controlling interest in iG Group

     On April 02, 2004, the Company purchased an interest of 12.25% in iG Group capital. On November 24, 2004, the Company purchased more 50.75% of iG Group capital and became owner of 63.0% of its capital share. The results of iG Group operations have been included in the consolidated financial statements as from such date.

     The Company obtained third party valuation appraisal for the intangibles, as due to the nature of iG Group business (free and paid internet access), the greater part of its value is associated with intangibles. Below is the summary of the estimated fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed at each acquisition date:

 
Net assets purchased under U.S. GAAP       November 24,  
(proportional to the interest acquired)  April 2, 2004  November 24, 2004  April 2, 2004  2004  July 31, 2005 
 
Current assets  8,196  45,290  8,196  45,290  4,970 
Non-current assets  40  1,357  40  1,357  71 
Property, plant and equipment  4,098  28,157  4,098  28,157  11,774 
Trademark  5,824  28,122  12,978 
Customer List  549  28,122  549  2,678  2,756 
Trademark  5,824  2,678 
   
  
Total assets acquired  18,707  105,604  18,707  105,604  32,549 
     
Current liabilities  3,054  20,890  3,054  20,890  3,355 
Non-current liabilities  1,682  18,517  1,682  18,517  3,236 
Deferred taxes on intangible assets  2,167  10,472  2,167  10,472  5,350 
     
Total liabilities assumed  6,903  49,879  6,903  49,879  11,941 
     
Total purchase price  150,114  143,664  150,114  143,664  54,651 
Goodwill under US GAAP  138,310  87,939  138,310  87,939  34,043 
Customer List Amortization:           
2004  464  550  464  550  
2005  464  550  1,750 
      
Reversal of Deferred Taxes Liabilities:           
2004  158  187  158  187  
2005  158  187  595 

F - 7686


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

     The Brazilian GAAP goodwill amounted to R$238,274289,470 at acquisition date and has been amortized overunder Brazilian GAAP in five years, and has been reversed under US GAAP in connection with the years proportionally to the profits generated by iG Group.adoption of SFAS 142. The remaining balance as of December 31, 20042005 is R$234,302.203,168. Intangible assets consist of thecustomer list and trademark value.The amortization related to the customer list is being calculated at the estimated churn rate and the future free cash flow generated by the customer list existing at the acquisition dates. Trademark and goodwill recognized in a purchase business combination and determined to have an indefinite useful life are not amortized, but instead tested for impairment at least annually in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 142. The amount of goodwill impairment, if any, was measured based on projected discounted future operating cash flows using a discount rate reflecting the Company’s average cost of funds. Under Brazilian GAAP, goodwill for the purchase is calculated at the difference between historical book value of the assets and liabilities assumed and the purchase price.

Allocation of goodwill by segment

     Until 2001, BrT operated only in the fixed-line business segment , when it incorporated BrT Serviços de Internet S.A. (BrTI) in order to develop an internet segment. In 2003, BrT acquired the controlling interest of iBEST Group and, in 2004, acquired the controlling interest of iG Group, both of which operate in the internet segment. Also in 2004, the Company started to offer mobile telephony services, through its wholly owned subsidiary, 14 Brasil Telecom Celular S.A. (BrT Celular).

     There was no goodwill related to the formation of BrTI and BrT Celular. The acquisitions of iBEST and IG generated goodwill, which was accounted for under the terms of SFAS 141 – Business Combinations and SFAS 142 - - Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (see the foregoing information). As each of these acquisitions meet the definition of reporting unit, i.e., constitute businesses for which discrete financial information is available and segment management regularly reviews the operating results (SFAS 142, paragraph 30), goodwill has been allocated and tested at the level of each entity.

     To clarify the disclosure requirement according to paragraph 45.c of SFAS 142 we have summarized below the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill:

        In Millions of R$ 
  
  Fixed telephony  Mobile    
  and data transmission  telephony   Internet
  
Balance as of January 1, 2003  1,094.2     
   Goodwill acquired during year:         
       iBEST      65.3 
       BrT Cabos Submarinos  6.5     
     
Balance as of December 31, 2003  1,100.8     65.3 
     
   Goodwill acquired during year:         
       MetroRED  58.8     
       Vant  65.8       
       IG      226.3 
   Impairment losses         
       Vant  65.8       
     
Balance as of December 31, 2004  1,159.6     291.6 
     
   Goodwill acquired during year:         
       IG      34.0 
     
Balance as of December 31, 2005  1,159.6     325.6 
     

F - 87


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

p.Revenue recognition

i) Activation and installation fees

     Under Brazilian GAAP, revenues from activation and installation fees are recognized upon activation of customer services. Under U.S. GAAP, revenues and related taxes from activation and installation fees are deferred and amortized over five years, the estimated average customer life.

     The adoption by the Company of Staff Accounting Bulletin 104 and Emerging Issues Task Force Issue 00-21 - Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables in 2003 had no impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations .operations.

ii) Sales of public telephone cards

     Under Brazilian GAAP revenues from public telephone phone cards are recognized when the cards are sold. Under U.S. GAAP, revenues generated from sales of public telephone phone cards are recognized as such services are provided. For U.S. GAAP, deferred revenues at each consolidated balance sheet date are determined based upon estimates of sold but unused public phone card credits outstanding as of each consolidated balance sheet date.

q. Provision for retirement incentive plan

     Under Brazilian GAAP, the Company recorded a provision for a retirement incentive plan during the year ended December 31, 2001 in connection with the intended rationalization of certain business activities of CRT (under theApoio Daqui plan). Under U.S. GAAP, such costs may only be accrued if they are part of a formal restructuring plan approved by management that specifically identifies the significant actions to be taken to complete the plan, the number and job classifications of employees to be terminated, and other strict criteria. As all of the criteria for accrual have not been met, the provision was reversed for U.S. GAAP purposes on December 31, 2001. There was no such provision in the liabilities as of December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2004, as the retirement incentive plan was carried out and settled during 2002.2005.

F - 7788


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

r. Derivative financial instruments

     Under Brazilian GAAP, swap contracts are recorded on the balance sheet based on the net amount to be received or paid. For U.S. GAAP purposes, the Company adopted SFAS 133, “Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” as amended by SFAS 137 and SFAS 138 (collectively, “SFAS 133”) on January 1, 2000. Under SFAS 133, the swap contracts are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized in earnings unless specific hedge criteria are met. The Company did not account for any transaction as hedging activity.

s. Unclaimed dividends and dividends in excess of retained earnings (deficit)

     Under Brazilian GAAP, dividends unclaimed by shareholders after three years was reversed against income in 2002 anduntil 2003. Under US GAAP, such unclaimed dividends are reversed against retained earnings.

     Under Brazilian GAAP, dividends in excess of accumulated balance of retained earnings are presented in these financial statements under retained earnings (deficit), within shareholders’ equity. Under Brazilian Corporate Law this situation would not be possible, as dividends cannot be paid if there is negative balance in retained earnings, but any excess distributed would be presented as an advance to shareholders as an asset balance. Under US GAAP, dividends in excess of accumulated balance of retained earnings would be presented as a reduction of paid-in-capital.

t. Capital lease

     Brazilian GAAP does not require capitalization of assets acquired through capital lease arrangements. Virtually all lease contracts are considered as operating lease, with charges being recorded in statements of operations throughout the period of the lease arrangement. The residual value, often reached at a bargain purchase option, after the period of the lease arrangement is capitalized and depreciated over the estimated useful remaining life.

     US GAAP requires capital lease arrangements defined under SFAS 13 to be capitalized as property, plant and equipment and depreciated over the estimated useful life of the asset.

u. Pre-operating costs

     According to Brazilian GAAP all expenses registered during the pre-operating stage of the subsidiary BrT Celular is deferred until the subsidiary starts its operations, when the deferred expenses are amortized over the future period of which the subsidiary expects to benefit from these expenses.

     Under US GAAP, expenses registered during the start-up stage and organizations of a development stage entity are expensed as incurred, according to Statement of Position 98-5 “Reporting on the Costs of Start-up activities”.

v. Issue of treasury stock

     Brazilian GAAP requires issue of treasury stock to be added to retained earnings (deficit), while under US GAAP this would be considered an addition to paid-in-capital.

F - 7889


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

w. Asset retirement obligations

     The Company adopted FASB Statement No. 143,Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations, effective January 1, 2003. This statement requires the Company to record the fair value of an asset retirement obligation as a liability in the period in which it incurs a legal obligation associated with the retirement of tangible long lived assets that result from the acquisition, construction, development, and/or normal use of the assets. The Company also would record a corresponding asset that is depreciated over the life of the asset. Subsequent to the initial measurement of the asset retirement obligation, the obligation is adjusted at the end of each period to reflect the passage of time and changes in the estimated future cash flows underlying the obligation.

     The Company has certain legal obligations related to BrT Celular’s infrastructure (tower assets) regarding remediation of leased land on which the Company’s network assets are located.

     This provision is not required under Brazilian GAAP.

F - 7990


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

Net income (loss) reconciliation of the differences between Brazilian GAAP and U. S. GAAP
Years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2004
2005

        
  2002       2003       2004    2003  2004  2005 
        
Net income (loss) as reported under Brazilian GAAP   (11,619)  (507,435)  98,840    (507,435) 98,840  (303,671)
Add/(deduct): Note 33        Note 33  
Different criteria for:           
Capitalized interest (a)  168,717  149,636  89,968  (a) 149,636  89,968  45,831 
Amortization of capitalized interest (a)  64,915  (60,113)  33,627  (a) (60,113) 33,627  40,763 
Pensions and other post-retirement benefits           
SISTEL           
U.S. GAAP prepaid (accrued) pension (cost) benefit (c)  27,981  13,247  25,037 
U.S. GAAP accrued pension cost  (c) 13,247  25,037  38,202 
FBrTPrev           
U.S. GAAP prepaid pension cost (c)  5,736  20,799  54,101 
U.S. GAAP accrued pension cost  (c) 20,799  54,101  263,460 
Items posted directly to shareholder’s equity:           
Fiscal incentive received (d)  554  3,845  450  (d) 3,845  450  
Social contribution rate change not enacted (g)  4,803  - -  - - 
Amortization of deferred credit on contributions plan           
expansion (l)  70,863  73,493  72,015  (l) 73,493  72,015  58,221 
Compensation cost of stock options (n)  (35)  (829)  (1,254)  (n) (829) (1,254) 1,637 
Amortization of goodwill attributable to purchase of           
controlling interest in CRT until 2001, net of reduction in        
depreciation due to step-down in fair value (o) (ii)   4,298  4,711  4,116 
controlling interest in CRT until 2001, net of reduction    
in depreciation due to step-down in fair value  (o) (ii) 4,711  4,116  3,532 
Reversal of amortization of goodwill recomputed (o) (ii)  96,133  96,133  66,591  (o) (ii) 96,133  66,591  102,716 
Reversal of provision for deferred tax asset – acquisition    
of IG  (o) (viii)   (50,330)
Purchase of minority interest in CRT:           
Amortization of goodwill until 2001, net of reduction in           
depreciation due to step-down in fair value (o) (iii)  10,161  10,539  10,325  (o) (iii) 10,539  10,325  8,349 
Amortization until 2001 and depreciation of step-up in           
basis of companies under common control (o) (iv)  (28,399)  (29,453)  (28,861)  (o) (iv) (29,453) (28,861) (23,333)
Amortization customer list of iBest (o) (v)  - -  (9,708)  (1,604)  (o) (v) (9,708) (1,604) (224)
Amortization intangibles of MetroRed (o) (vii)  - -  - -  (17,257) 
Amortization intangibles of BrT Multimídia  (o) (vii)  (17,257) (20,371)
Amortization intangibles of IG (o) (viii)  - -  - -  (1,014)  (o) (viii)  (1,014) (3,620)
Reversal of amortization of goodwill GlobeNet o (vi)  - -  649  (700)  o (vi) 649  (700) 1,881 
Reversal of amortization of goodwill iBest (o) (v)  - -  - -  43,034  (o) (v)  43,034  24,975 
Reversal of amortization of goodwill MetroRed (o) (vii)  - -  - -  15,512 
Reversal of amortization of goodwill BrT Multimídia  (o) (vii)  15,512  23,269 
Reversal of amortization of goodwill IG (o) (viii)  - -  - -  4,015  (o) (viii)  4,015  75,996 
Deferred revenue, net of related costs - activation and           
installation fees (p) (i)  13,332  11,449  7,827  (p) (i) 11,449  7,827  11,214 
Deferred revenue - public telephone cards (p) (ii)  2,981  (1,835)  (3,148)  (p) (ii) (1,835) (3,148) (1,363)
Reversal of provision for retirement incentive plan (q)  (33,000)  - -  - -  (q)   
Change in fair value of derivative financial instruments (r)  3,976  37,045  (9,281)  (r) 37,045  (9,281) (16,746)
Reversal of gain attributable to unclaimed dividends (s)  (6,468)  (10,544)  - -  (s) (10,544)  
Capital leases (t)  - -  116  (725)  (t) 116  (725) 136 
Pre-operating costs of mobile operations (u)  - -  (22,256)  (170,602)  (u) (22,256) (170,602) 
Reversal of pre-operating costs of mobile operations           
amortization (u)  - -  - -  6,431  (u)  6,431  38,918 
Asset retirement obligation (w)  - -  - -  (5)  (w)  (5) (64)
Consolidation adjustments - others   - -  (20)  11,593    (20) 11,593  
 
Deferred tax effect of above adjustments   (77,648)  (67,208)  (24,124)    (67,208) (24,124) (150,588)
        
U.S. GAAP net income (loss)   317,280  (287,739)  284,907    (287,739) 284,907  168,790 
        

F - 8091


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

      
 2002  2003  2004  2003 2004 2005
      
Net income (loss) per thousand shares in accordance with             
U.S. GAAP:             
U.S. GAAP net income (loss) - allocated to common shares             
- basic and diluted  143,689  (132,356)  131,284  (132,356) 131,284  76,059 
U.S. GAAP net income (loss) - allocated to preferred shares             
- basic and diluted  173,591  (155,383)  153,623  (155,383) 153,623  92,731 
Weighted average shares outstanding (in thousands):             
Common shares - basic  241,964,446  248,591,562  249,597,048  248,591,562  249,597,048  249,597,048 
Common shares - diluted  241,964,446  248,591,562  249,597,048  248,591,562  249,597,048  249,597,048 
Preferred shares - basic  292,319,690  291,839,496  292,068,167  291,839,496  292,068,167  304,305,497 
Preferred shares - diluted  292,321,007  291,840,928  292,070,164  291,840,928  292,070,164  304,306,701 
U.S. GAAP net income (loss), per thousand shares:             
Common shares - basic  0.59  (0.54)  0.53  (0.54) 0.53  0.30 
Common shares - diluted  0.59  (0.54)  0.53  (0.54) 0.53  0.30 
Preferred shares - basic  0.59  (0.54)  0.53  (0.54) 0.53  0.30 
Preferred shares - diluted  0.59  (0.54)  0.53  (0.54) 0.53  0.30 

F - 8192


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

Shareholders’ equity reconciliation of the differences between Brazilian GAAP and U.S. GAAP
As of December 31, 20032004 and 2004
2005

   
   2004  2005 
   2003     2004    
Total shareholders’ equity as reported under Brazilian GAAP  Note 33  6,840,962  6,481,365  Note 33  6,481,365  5,496,607 
Add/(deduct):             
Different criteria for:             
Capitalized interest  (a)  (390,395)  (300,428)  (a) (300,428) (254,597)
Amortization of capitalized interest  (a)  666,707  700,334  (a) 700,334  741,095 
Pension and other post-retirement benefits             
SISTEL:             
U.S. GAAP gain on plan curtailment and settlement  (c)  176,607  176,607  (c) 176,607  176,607 
U.S. GAAP accrued pension cost  (c)  (239,847)  (214,810)  (c) (214,810) (176,607)
FBRTPREV:             
U.S. GAAP prepaid accrued pension cost  (c)  426,233  480,334  (c) 480,334  743,793 
Contributions to plant expansion:             
Amortization of deferred credit  (l)  605,025  677,040  (l) 677,040  735,262 
Subscribed capital stock  (l)  (611,449)  (611,449)  (l) (611,449) (611,449)
Donations and subscriptions for investment  (l)  (182,861)  (182,861)  (l) (182,861) (182,861)
Goodwill attributable to purchase of minority interests in             
eight operating companies  (o) (i)  16,464  16,464  (o) (i) 16,464  16,464 
Amortization of goodwill attributable to purchase of             
controlling interest in CRT until 2001, net of reduction             
in depreciation due to step-down in fair value  (o) (ii)  (51,355)  (47,239)  (o) (ii) (47,239) (43,707)
Reversal of amortization of goodwill recomputed  (o) (ii)  192,266  258,857  (o) (ii) 258,857  361,573 
Reversal of provision for deferred tax asset – acquisition       
of IG  (o) (viii)  (50,330)
Purchase of minority interest in CRT:             
Net effect of recording purchase on transaction closing             
date  (o) (iii)  (6,453)  (6,453)  (o) (iii) (6,453) (6,453)
Amortization of goodwill (until 2001), net of reduction             
in depreciation due to step-down in fair value  (o) (iii)  3,081  13,406  (o) (iii) 13,406  21,755 
Difference in book value and market value of shares             
issued in exchange  (o) (iii)  (347,268)  (347,268)  (o) (iii) (347,268) (347,268)
Step-up in basis of companies under common control,             
net of amortization until 2001 and depreciation  (o) (iv)  342,536  313,675  (o) (iv) 313,675  290,342 
Amortization customer list of iBest  (o) (v)  (9,708)  (11,312)  (o) (v) (11,312) (11,536)
Amortization intangibles of MetroRed  (o) (vii)  - -  (17,257) 
Amortization intangibles of BrT Multimídia  (o) (vii) (17,257) (37,628)
Amortization intangibles of IG  (o) (viii)  - -  (1,014)  (o) (viii) (1,014) (4,634)
Reversal of amortization of goodwill GlobeNet  (o) (vi)  649  (51)  (o) (vi) (51) 1,830 
Reversal of amortization of goodwill iBest  (o) (v)  - -  43,034  (o) (v) 43,034  68,009 
Reversal of amortization of goodwill MetroRed  (o) (vii)  - -  15,512 
Reversal of amortization of goodwill BrT Multimídia  (o) (vii) 15,512  38,781 
Reversal of amortization of goodwill IG:  (o) (viii)  - -  4,015  (o) (viii) 4,015  80,010 
Deferred revenue, net of related costs - activation and             
installation fees  (p) (i)  (57,694)  (49,867)  (p) (i) (49,867) (38,653)
Deferred revenue - public telephone cards  (p) (ii)  (10,115)  (13,263)  (p) (ii) (13,263) (14,626)
Change in fair value of derivative financial instruments  (r)  46,545  37,264  (r) 37,264  20,518 
Capital lease - PP&E  (t)  5,157  16,447  (t) 16,447  12,291 
Capital lease - Liabilities:  (t)  (5,041)  (17,055)  (t) (17,055) (12,763)
Preoperating costs of mobile operations  (u)  (22,256)  (192,858)  (u) (192,858) (192,858)
Reversal of pre-operating costs of mobile operations             
amortization  (u)  - -  6,431  (u) 6,431  45,349 
Asset retirement obligation  (w)  - -  (5)  (w) (5) (68)
Deferred tax effect of above adjustments    (131,350)  (155,475)    (155,475) (306,062)
      
Total shareholders’ equity under US GAAP    7,256,440  7,072,120    7,072,120  6,558,186 
      

F - 8293


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

Statements of changes in shareholders’ equity in accordance with U.S. GAAP
As of December 31, 20032004 and 2004
2005

  Note  Total 
Balance, December 31, 2002January 1, 2004    7,812.0247,256,440 
 
Forfeiture of unclaimed dividends  33 (s) 10,54411,569 
Increase in treasury stock  26 (b) (33,018) (37,550)
Declaration of dividends  26 (e) (246,200) (444,500)
Contribution by the employees related to the costs of the stock     
compensation plan  33 (n)829 
Net loss for the year (287,739) 
Balance, December 31, 2003 7,256,440 
Forfeiture of unclaimed dividends 33 (s) 11,569 
Increase in treasury stock 26 (b) (37,550) 
Declaration of dividends 26 (e) (444,500) 
Contribution by the employees related to the costs of the stock 
compensation plan 33 (n)  1,254 
Net income for the year    284,907 
   
 
Balance, December 31, 2004    7,072,120 
   
Forfeiture of unclaimed dividends 33 (s)7,685 
Increase in treasury stock 26 (b)(62,272)
Declaration of dividends 26 (e)(626,500)
Contribution by the employees related to the costs of the stock 
compensation plan 33 (n)(1,637)
Net income for the year 168,790 
Balance, December 31, 2005 6,558,186 

34. Additional disclosures required by U.S. GAAP

a.Pension and other post-retirement benefits:

i. Plans administered by Fundação 14

     As from the split of the only pension plan managed by SISTEL, the PBS, in January 2000, already predicted the evolution trend for a new stage. Such stage would result in an own and independent management model for TCSPREV pension plan, by means of a specific entity to manage and to operate them, and this fact has become more and more evident throughout the years. This trend also occurred in other main SISTEL pension plan sponsoring companies, which created their respective supplementary pension plan foundations. In this scenario, Fundação 14 de Previdência Privada was created in 2004, with the purpose of taking over the management and operation of the TCSPREV pension plan, which started as from March 10, 2005, whose process was backed by the segment’s specific legislation and properly approved by the Secretaria de Previdência Complementar – SPC (the Brazilian pension’s regulatory authority).

     In accordance with the Transfer Agreement entered into between Fundação Sistel de Seguridade Social and Fundação 14 de Previdência Privada, SISTEL, by means of the Management Agreement, has been rendering management and operation services of TCSPREV and PAMEC-BrT plans to Fundação 14, after the transferring of these plans, which took place on March 10, 2005, for a period of up to 18 months, while Fundação 14 organizes itself to take over the management and operation services of its plans.

F - 94


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

A summary of the liability as of December 31, 2004 and 2005 for the Company’s active employees’ defined benefit pension plan was as follows:

    
  2004  2005 
   
Funded status:     
   Accumulated benefit obligation:     
           Vested  449,737  593,620 
           Non-vested  36,977  30,686 
   
           Total  486,714  624,306 
   
Projected benefit obligation  492,612  598,398 
Allocated assets  649,450  906,103 
   
Projected obligation in excess of assets  (156,839) (307,705)
Unrecognized gains  87,688  189,914 
Unrecognized prior service cost  113,785  108,149 
Unrecognized net transition obligation  (6,432) (5,131)
   
Accrued pension cost/(gain) 38,203  (14,873)
   

     In March 2000, the Company offered a new defined contribution plan, and approximately 80% of the active employees migrated to the new plan. The accumulated benefit of each employee who migrated was transferred to an individual account for each employee, with 100% vesting in this amount. The effect of settlement and curtailment of this portion of the defined benefit plan under SFAS 88 “Employers’ Accounting and Settlements and Curtailments of Defined Benefit Pension Plans and for Termination Benefits “ was a gain of R$176,607, which was reflected in the reconciliation to U.S. GAAP net income.

     The net periodic pension cost for 2004 and 2005 for the Fundação 14 administered plans was as follows:

    
  2004  2005 
   
 
Service cost  3,700  4,221 
Interest cost  31,013  35,188 
Expected return on assets  (50,808) (84,836)
Amortization of gains  (7,428) (6,443)
Expected Participants Contributions  (627) (576)
   
Net periodic pension cost (income) (24,150) (52,446)
   

     The changes in the accrued pension cost for the Fundação 14 administered plans for the year ended December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005 is as follows:

    
  2004  2005 
   
Accrued pension cost at the beginning of the year  63,345  38,569 
Net periodic cost for the year  (23,888) (52,446)
Company contributions during the year  (888) (796)
   
Accrued pension cost at the end of the year  38,569  (14,673)(2)
   

The actuarial assumptions used in 2003, 2004 and 2005 were as follows:

____________________________
(2 )An asset has not been recorded by the Company as it is not clearly evident that the asset may offset future contributions or that will be reimbursed in the future.

F - 95


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

  2003  2004  2005 
    
 
Discount rate for determining projected benefit obligations  6.00%  6.00%  6.00% 
Rate of increase in compensation levels  2.00%  2.00%  2.00% 
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets of TCSPREV       
(1) 6.50%  12.50%  6.99% 
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets of PAMEC (1) 6.50%  11.00%  6.16% 

     (1) Our financial statements were not affected by this rate. We confirm that this rate was not used in our FASB 87 calculations for our accounting. The rate was arrived at by taking measure of the instruments in which the pension funds are invested and the expected return on such funds over a 12-month period. Such estimated rate was used only for our internal planning purposes and is not reflected in any of our financial statements filed as part of the 20-F report.

     The rates are real rates and exclude inflation.

     The weighted-average asset allocation of the Fundação 14 administered plans at December 31, 2004 and 2005 were as follows:

     TCSPrev:

  Asset Allocation 
  
Asset Category  2004  2005 
   
 
Equity securities  46.3%  16.57 
Debt securities  50.6%  82.45 
Real estate  1.5%  0.00% 
Loans  1.6%  0.98% 
   
Grand Total  100%  100% 
   

     PAMEC:

  Asset Allocation 
  
Asset Category  2004  2005 
   
 
Equity securities  0%  0% 
Debt securities  100%  100% 
Real estate  0%  0% 
Loans  0%  0% 
   
Grand Total  100%  100% 
   

     The Pension Funds’ investment strategy is described in the Investment Policy, which is approved annually by the Pension Fund’s Board. It states that the investment decisions should consider: (i) capital preservation; (ii) diversification; (iii) risk tolerance; (iv) expected returns versus benefit plan’s interest rates; (v) compatibility between investments liquidity and pensions’ cash flows and (vi) reasonable costs. It also defines volume ranges for the different types of investment allowed for pension funds, which are: domestic fixed income, domestic equity, loans to pension fund’s members and real state. In the fixed income portfolio, only low credit risk securities are allowed. Derivative instruments are only permitted for hedge purposes. Loans are

F - 96


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

restricted to certain credit limits. Tactical allocation is decided by the Investment Committee, consisted of the Pension Fund’s Officers, Investment Manager and one member designated by the Board. Execution is performed by the Finance Department.

     The Company expects to contribute R$16,254 to its Fundação 14 administered plans in 2006.

     The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid:

  TCSPrev PAMEC
   
2006  18,247  42 
2007  18,461  47 
2008  20,312  52 
2009  22,825  61 
2010  25,232  67 
2011-2015  169,145  459 

     The funded status of the pension and post retirement plans under Brazilian GAAP and U.S. GAAP differ. Benefit obligations differ because they have been prepared using different actuarial assumptions permitted under Brazilian and U.S. GAAP.

F - 97


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

ii. Plans administered by SISTEL

     The Company, together with other former companies in the Telebrás group, sponsored multi-employer defined benefit pension and other post-retirement benefit plans, through the end of 1999, which are operated and administered by SISTEL. In December 1999, the Company and the other companies that participate in the SISTEL plan reached an agreement to withdraw the active participants to the pension plan and establish a new plan for each of the New Holding Companies. The parties agreed to allocate the plan assets based on the liabilities in accordance with Brazilian GAAP. The allocation of the initial transition obligation and unamortized gains and losses was based on the projected benefit obligation (PBO) of each individual sponsor divided by the total PBO of SISTEL at December 31, 1999. The inactive employees of all of the New Holding Companies that participated in the SISTEL defined benefit pension plan will remain as part of the multiemployer plan in SISTEL. The post-retirement benefit plans will also remain as a multiemployer plan; however, SISTEL no longer subsidizes life insurance premiums for inactive (retired) employees after December 31, 1999.

     The Company remains jointly and severally liable for the multiemployer portion of the plan, therefore, no amounts were recorded under those plans.

F - 83


BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

     A summary of the liability as of December 31, 2003 and 2004 for the Company’s active employees’ defined benefit pension plan was as follows:

  2003  2004 
   
Funded status:     
   Accumulated benefit obligation:     
           Vested  288,888  449,737 
           Non-vested  33,181  36,977 
   
           Total  322,069  486,714 
   
Projected benefit obligation  418,935  492,612 
Allocated assets  573,834  649,450 
   
Projected obligation in excess of assets  (154,899)  (156,839) 
Unrecognized gains  106,451  87,688 
Unrecognized prior service cost  119,421  113,785 
Unrecognized net transition obligation  (7,733)  (6,432) 
   
Accrued pension cost  63,240  38,203 
   

     A summary of the SISTEL pension plan as of December 31, 20032004 and 20042005 for the multiemployer portion (inactive employees pension plan) is as follows:

              December 31  December 31 
  
    2003     2004  2004     2005 
    
Projected benefit obligation (100% vested)  3,484,245  3,590,683  3,590,683  3,876,556 
Fair value of plan assets  (4,163,102)  (4,669,444)  (4,669,444) (5,021,828)
    
Deficiency (excess) of assets over projected obligation   (678,857)  (1,078,761)  (1,078,761) (1,145,272)
    

     In March 2000, the Company offered a new defined contribution plan, and approximately 80% of the active employees migrated to the new plan. The accumulated benefit of each employee who migrated was transferred to an individual account for each employee, with 100% vesting in this amount. The effect of settlement and curtailment of this portion of the defined benefit plan under SFAS 88 “Employers’ Accounting and Settlements and Curtailments of Defined Benefit Pension Plans and for Termination Benefits “ was a gain of R$176,607, which was reflected in the reconciliation to U.S. GAAP net income.

The net periodic pension cost foractuarial assumptions used in 2003, 2004 and 2004 for the SISTEL administered plans was2005 were as follows:

  2003  2004 
   
 
Service cost   30,752  3,700 
Interest cost   15,779  31,013 
Expected return on assets  (23,808)  (50,808) 
Amortization of gains  (7,417)  (7,428) 
Expected Participants Contributions  (14,504)  (627) 
   
Net periodic pension cost (income)  802  (24,150) 
   
  2003  2004  2005 
    
 
Discount rate for determining projected benefit obligations  6.00%  6.00%  6.00% 
Rate of increase in compensation levels  2.00%  2.00%  2.00% 
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets of PAMA (1) 6.50%  10.90%  8.33% 
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets of PBS-A (1) 6.50%  6.90%  8.33% 

     (1) Our financial statements were not affected by this rate. We confirm that this rate was not used in our FASB 87 calculations for our accounting. The rate was arrived at by taking measure of the instruments in which the pension funds are invested and the expected return on such funds over a 12-month period. Such estimated rate was used only for our internal planning purposes and is not reflected in any of our financial statements filed as part of the 20-F report.

F - 8498


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

     The changes in the accrued pension cost for the SISTEL administered plans for the year ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 is as follows:

Accrued pension cost as of December  31, 200276,487 
Net periodic cost for 2003 (11,939) 
Company contributions during 2003 (1,203) 
Accrued pension cost as of December  31, 200363,345 
Net periodic cost for 2004 (23,888) 
Company contributions during 2004 (888) 
Accrued pension cost as of December  31, 200438,569 

     The actuarial assumptions used in 2002, 2003 and 2004 were as follows:

  2002  2003  2004 
    
 
Discount rate for determining projected benefit obligations  6.00%  6.00%  6.00% 
Rate of increase in compensation levels  1.00%  2.00%  2.00% 
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets  9.00%  6.50%  12.50% 

     The rates are real rates and exclude inflation.

     The Company maintains jointly with other companies a post-retirement benefit plan (PAMA) for the participants already covered who were in such position on January 31, 2000. Based on legal and actuarial opinions, the Company’s liability is exclusively limited to 1.5% of the payroll of the active participants.

     The weighted-average asset allocation of the SISTEL administered plans at December 31, 2004 and 20032005 were as follows:

     TCSPrev:

    Asset Allocation 
   
Asset Category  2003  2004 
   
 
Equity securities    49.3%  46.3% 
Debt securities    47.8%  50.6% 
Real estate    1.5%  1.5% 
Loans    1.4%  1.6% 
    
Grand Total    100%  100% 
    

PBS-A (multiemployer):

   Asset Allocation  Asset Allocation 
   
Asset Category Asset Category   2003   2004   2004   2005 
    
Equity securities    31.11%  26.85%  26.85%  31.32% 
Debt securities    60.19%  63.93%  63.93%  60.03% 
Real estate    8.22%  8.73%  8.73%  8.10% 
Loans    0.48%  0.49%  0.49%  0.55% 
     
Grand Total    100%  100%  100%  100% 
     

F - 85


BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

     PAMA:

    Asset Allocation 
   
Asset Category  2003  2004 
   
 
Equity securities    0%  0% 
Debt securities    100%  100% 
Real estate    0%  0% 
Loans    0%  0% 
    
Grand Total    100%  100% 
    

     PAMEC:

   Asset Allocation  Asset Allocation 
   
Asset Category Asset Category  2003  2004  2004  2005 
    
Equity securities    0%  0%  0%  0% 
Debt securities    100%  100%  100%  100% 
Real estate    0%  0%  0%  0% 
Loans    0%  0%  0%  0% 
     
Grand Total    100%  100%  100%  100% 
     

     The Pension Funds’ investment strategy is described in the Investment Policy, which is approved annually by the Pension Fund’s Board. It states that the investment decisions should consider: (i) capital preservation; (ii) diversification; (iii) risk tolerance; (iv) expected returns versus benefit plan’s interest rates; (v) compatibility between investments liquidity and pensions’ cash flows and (vi) reasonable costs. It also defines volume ranges for the different types of investment allowed for pension funds, which are: domestic fixed income, domestic equity, loans to pension fund’s members and real state. In the fixed income portfolio, only low credit risk securities are allowed. Derivative instruments are only permitted for hedge purposes. Loans are restricted to certain credit limits. Tactical allocation is decided by the Investment Committee, consisted of the Pension Fund’s Officers, Investment Manager and one member designated by the Board. Execution is performed by the Finance Department.

     The Company expects to contribute R$13,737 to its SISTEL administered plans in 2005.

     The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid:

  TCSPrev  PBS-A  PAMA  PAMEC 
     
2005  15,780  334,637  30,765  37 
2006  17,500  345,708  33,706  42 
2007  19,062  356,864  36,859  46 
2008  21,037  367,904  40,278  50 
2009  23,522  378,807  43,925  59 
2010-2014  175,507  2,046,352  284,836  391 
  PBS-A  PAMA 
   
2006     348,185         33,242 
2007     360,827         36,664 

F - 99


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

2008  173,608  40,409 
2009  386,473  44,481 
2010  399,361  48,873 
2011-2015  2,185,237  323,607 

     The funded status of the pension and post retirement plans under Brazilian GAAP and U.S. GAAP differ. Benefit obligations differ because they have been prepared using different actuarial assumptions permitted under Brazilian and U.S. GAAP.

F - 86


BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

     The net assets of the PBS-A plan differ under Brazilian GAAP and U.S. GAAP principally due to the accrual of income tax contingencies of the pension fund for U.S. GAAP purposes in the amount of R$303,256(241,868(R$364,644303,256 in 2003)2004), respectively. The contingency arises out of uncertainty as to the income tax status of Brazilian pension funds in general because the tax law is unclear as to whether these funds are exempt from tax on their investment gains. Under Brazilian GAAP, two methods of accounting for the income tax contingency are currently permitted. The tax is either deducted from plan assets for the purposes of determining the funded status of the plan or it is not deducted, but is disclosed in a note as being a contingency. Management of the pension fund has determined that the Brazilian GAAP financial statements of the fund be prepared on the basis that the legal arguments against assessment of the tax on the investment gains are sufficiently strong as to avoid the need for the potential liability to be recognized. However, for U.S. GAAP purposes, management of the Company believes that the assessment of this potential income tax liability is probable. Accordingly, in determining the funded status for U.S. GAAP purposes, the potential income tax liability (calculated in accordance with SFAS 109) has been deducted from the fair value of the plan assets.

ii.iii. Plan administered by Fundação BrTPrev (FBrTPrev)

     On July 31, 2000, the Company acquired the controlling interest in CRT, and in December 2001, acquired the minority interest. At the acquisition dates, the liability for defined benefit plans of CRT were recorded under U.S. GAAP as part of the fair value.

     In October 2002, the Company offered employees the option to transfer to a new defined contribution settled benefits plan, BrTPREV. The benefit obligation relating to each employee that opted to migrate was transferred to an individual account at 100% of the obligation under the previous plan in the amount of R$362,469. The employees that did not opt to migrate to BrTPREV remained in their previous plans.

     A summary of the liability as of December 31, 20032004 and 20042005 (Alternative, Founder and BrTPREV are presented consolidated) for the CRT employees’ benefit plans was as follows:

  
Funded status:  2003  2004  2004  2005 
    
Accumulated benefit obligation:         
Vested  891,269  973,323  973,323  1,397,138 
Non-vested  83,739  83,071  83,071  19,663 
Total  975,008  1,056,394  1,056,394  1,416,800 
    
Projected benefit obligation  990,752  1,056,702  1,056,702  1,419,601 
Allocated assets  486,348  555,256  555,256  691,686 
    
Projected obligation in excess of assets  504,404  501,446  501,446  727,915 
Unrecognized gains  280,978  246,967 
Unrecognized gains/(losses) 246,967  (17,870)3 
Unrecognized prior service cost   (23,989)     (22,437)     (22,437)    (20,885)
Unrecognized net transition obligation  (343,392)  (324,315) 
  
Accrued pension cost  418,001  401,661 
  

____________________________
3 As described in note 25.a.4, in December 2005 the Company started to adopt the overall mortality table UP94 with two-year grievance and separated by gender. The adoption of this revised table generated actuarial losses., affecting actuarial unrecognized gain/losses.

F - 87100


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

Unrecognized net transition obligation  (324,315) (305,238)
   
Accrued pension cost  401,661  383,922 
   

     The net periodic pension cost for CRT for the year ended December 31, 20032004 and 20042005 (Alternative, Founder and BrTPREV are presented consolidated) was as follows:

  
    2003  2004  2004   2005 
    
Service cost  6,502  377  377  141 
Interest cost  154,784  160,304  160,304  164,211 
Expected return on assets  (113,926)  (62,798)  (62,798) (86,287)
Amortization of (gains) losses  22,450  (15,729)  (15,729) 2,606 
    
Net periodic pension cost  69,810  82,154  82,154  80,671 
    

     The changes in the accrued pension cost for the plans administered by FBRTPREV for the year ended December 31, 20032004 and 20042005 (Alternative, Founder and BrTPREV are presented consolidated) were as follows:

  
 2003   2004  2004   2005 
    
Accrued pension cost at the beginning of the year  438,800  418,001  418,001  401,661 
Net periodic cost for the year  69,810  82,154  82,154  80,671 
Company contributions during the year  (90,609)  (98,494)  (98,494) (98,410)
    
Accrued pension cost at the end of the year  418,001  401,661  401,661  383,922 
    

The actuarial assumptions used in 20032004 and 20042005 were follows:

  
 2003  2004  2004  2005 
    
Discount rate for determining projected benefit obligations  6.00%  6.00%  6.00%  6.00% 
Rate of increase in compensation levels  2.00%  2.00%  2.00%  2.00% 
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets  6.00%  6.00% 
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets (1) 6.00%  7.00% 

     (1) Our financial statements were not affected by this rate. We confirm that this rate was not used in our FASB 87 calculations for our accounting. The rate was arrived at by taking measure of the instruments in which the pension funds are invested and the expected return on such funds over a 12-month period. Such estimated rate was used only for our internal planning purposes and is not reflected in any of our financial statements filed as part of the 20-F report.

     The above are real rates and exclude inflation.

     The weighted-average asset allocation of the FBrTPrev administered plans at December 31, 2004 and 20032005 were as follows:

   Asset Allocation  Asset Allocation 
   
Asset Category Asset Category  2003  2004  2004  2005 
    
Equity securities    8.80%  7.29%  7.29%  11.83% 
Debt securities    84.79%  87.22%  87.22%  82.51% 
Real estate    5.52%  4.66%  4.66%  4.81% 
Loans    0.89%  0.83%  0.83%  0.85% 
     
Grand Total    100%  100%  100%  100% 
     

F - 88


BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

     The Pension Funds’ investment strategy is described in the Investment Policy, which is approved annually by the Pension Fund’s Board. It states that the investment decisions should

F - 101


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

consider: (i) capital preservation; (ii) diversification; (iii) risk tolerance; (iv) expected returns versus benefit plan’s interest rates; (v) compatibility between investments liquidity and pensions’ cash flows and (vi) reasonable costs. It also defines volume ranges for the different types of investment allowed for pension funds, which are: domestic fixed income, domestic equity, loans to pension fund’s members and real state. In the fixed income portfolio, only low credit risk securities are allowed. Derivative instruments are only permitted for hedge purposes. Loans are restricted to certain credit limits. Tactical allocation is decided by the Investment Committee, consisted of the Pension Fund’s Officers, Investment Manager and one member designated by the Board. Execution is performed by the Finance Department.

     The Company expects to contribute R$112,335125,009 to its FBrtPRev administered plans in 2005.

     The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid:

2005  96,829 
2006  104,724  111,601 
2007  113,571  113,738 
2008  122,891  118,526 
2009  133,171  124,097 
2010-2014  872,660 
2010  129,580 
2011-2015  735,103 

b. Stock options

     On December 17, 2002, the Company granted 622,364 thousand stock options under Stock Option Program B (refer to Note 25.b for the conditions of the program). The per share weighted average fair value of stock options granted during 2002 on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model was R$4.09 with the following weighted average assumptions: expected dividend yield 5.1%, risk-free interest rate of 23% p.a. (which equals the SELIC interest rate), and an expected vesting term of 3 years.

     On December 19, 2003, the Company granted 308,033 thousand stock options under Stock Option Program B (refer to Note 25.b for the conditions of the program). The per share weighted average fair value of stock options granted during 2003 on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model was R$5.56 with the following weighted average assumptions: expected dividend yield 3.2%, risk-free interest rate of 8.6% p.a. (which equals the National Treasury Notes interest rate), and an expected vesting term of 3 years.

     On December 21, 2004, the Company granted 507,650 thousand stock options under Stock Option Program B (refer to Note 25.b for the conditions of the program). The per share weighted average fair value of stock options granted during 2004 on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model was R$2.76 with the following weighted average assumptions: expected dividend yield 3.1%, risk-free interest rate of 8.4% p.a. (which equals the National Treasury Notes interest rate), and an expected vesting term of 2 years.

F - 89102


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

c. Segment Reporting

     Segment information is presented in respect of the Company’s and its subsidiaries business that was identified based on its management structure and on internal management reporting, according to SFAS 131 “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information”, and are described as follows:

  • Fixed telephony and data transmission: refers to the services rendered by BrT, MetroREDBrT Multimídia and Vant using the wire line network.
  • Mobile telephony: refers to the services rendered by BrT Celular beginning on the last quarter of 2004.
  • Internet: refers to the services rendered by BrTI, iBEST Group and iG Group in connection with the provision of internet services and related activities.

Inter-segment pricing is determined on an arm’s length basis.

     The information presented is derived from the Brazilian Corporation Law financial statements, which is the primary basis for management decisions and assessments.

     Segment results, assets and liabilities include items directly attributable to a segment as well as those that can be allocated on a reasonable basis.

2004 2005 
Fixed telephony and data transmission  Mobile telephony Internet Holding companiesEliminationsConsolidatedFixed
telephony
 and data
transmission 
 Mobile
telephony 
Internet Eliminations Consolidated 
Gross operating revenue 12,699,485 102,299 310,519 - (348,861) 12,763,442 13,924,898 989,263 582,081 (809,003)14,687,239 
Deductions (3,634,095) (23,317) (41,174) - (3,698,586) (4,190,616)(289,415)(68,894)370 (4,548,555)
Net operating revenue 9,065,390 78,982 269,345 - (348,861) 9,064,856 9,734,282 699,848 513,187 (808,633)10,138,684 
Cost of services rendered and
goods sold
(5,689,884) (147,409) (199,278) - 208,559 (5,828,012) (5,911,156)(959,251)(337,784)684,689 (6,523,502)
Gross profit 3,375,506 (68,427) 70,067 - (140,302) 3,236,844 3,823,126 (259,403)175,403 (123,945)3,615,182 
  
Operating expenses, net (2,066,205) (104,876) (85,776) (3) 140,302 (2,116,558) (2,916,776)(588,461)(168,405)123,958 (3,549,685)
Selling expenses (1,102,190) (90,137) (48,054) - - 154,604 (1,085,777) (1,227,199)(487,783)(115,034)174,267 (1,655,749)
General and administrative (932,441) (14,296) (18,671) (3) 3,825 (961,586) (1,079,120)(128,092)(58,640)9,917 (1,255,935)
Management Remuneration (7,214) - - (784) - - (7,998) (9,196)(2,499)(11,695)
Other, net (24,360) (443) (18,267) - - (18,127) (61,197) 
Other Operating Expenses, net (601,261)27,414 7,768 (60,227)(626,306)
  
Operating profit/(loss) before
financial income/(expenses)
and equity
1,309,301 (173,303) (15,709) (3) - 1,120,286 906,350 (847,864)6,998 13 65,497 
  
Financial expenses/(income), net 999,512 6,510 (6,156) - - 24,148 1,024,014 (1,155,908)     (45,309)23,000 (44,523)(1,222,740)
  
Income and social contribution
taxes/(benefit)
108,311 (60,713) (3,927) - - 43,671 53,774 300,888 34,404 389,066 
  
Net income/(loss) for the year 292,814 (119,100) 60,042 1,553 41,655 276,964 (271,839)(598,676)185,919 380,925 (303,671)
 
Accounts receivable 2,070,499 91,233 54,414 - (104,567) 2,111,579 2,055,750 186,143 62,918 (151,998)2,152,813 
Inventories 7,804 166,229 - 174,033 5,372 77,672 - (9)83,035 
Fixed assets, net 7,679,081 1,149,084 69,061 - 8,897,226 6,814,782 1,339,182 70,985 - 8,224,949 
Expenditures for additions to
long lived assets
1,187,907 1,175,691 13,672 - 2,377,269 1,423,888 441,337 66,324 - 1,931,549 

F - 90103


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

2003 2004 
Fixedtelephonyand data transmissionInternetEliminationsConsolidated  Fixed
telephony
and data
transmission
 Mobile
 telephony 
Internet Holding
 companies
EliminationsConsolidated
Gross operating revenue 11,075,731 190,563 (188,913) 11,077,381 12,699,485 102,299 310,519 - (348,861)12,763,442 
Deductions (3,141,509) (20,678) - (3,162,187) (3,634,095)(23,317)(41,174)- (3,698,586)
Net operating revenue 7,934,222 169,885 (188,913) 7,915,194 9,065,390 78,982 269,345 - (348,861)9,064,856 
Cost of services rendered and goods sold (4,765,058) (141,918) 53,603 (4,853,373) (5,689,884)(147,409)(199,278)- 208,559 (5,828,012)
Gross profit 3,169,164 27,967 (135,310) 3,061,821 3,375,506 (68,427)70,067 - (140,302)3,236,844 
 
Operating expenses, net (1,949,132) (16,404) 135,310 (1,830,226) (2,066,205)(104,876)(85,776)(3)140,302 (2,116,558)
Selling expenses (947,393) (9,534) 136,990 (819,937) (1,102,190)(90,137)(48,054)154,604 (1,085,777)
General and administrative (780,966) (8,682) 1,406 (788,242) (932,441)(14,296)(18,671)(3)3,825 (961,586)
Management Remuneration (6,748) (346) - - (7,094) (7,214)(784)(7,998)
Other, net (214,025) 2,158 (3,086) (214,953) (24,360)(443)(18,267)(18,127)(61,197)
 
Operating profit/(loss) before financial income/(expenses)
and equity
1,220,032 11,563 - 1,231,595 1,309,301 (173,303)(15,709)(3)- 1,120,286 
 
Financial expenses / (income), net 1,091,671 (5,881) 5,212 1,091,002 
Financial expenses/(income), net 999,512 6,510 (6,156)24,148 1,024,014 
 
Income and social contribution taxes / (benefit) (65,946) 7,929  (58,017) 
Income and social contribution  
taxes/(benefit)108,311 (60,713)(3,927)43,671 
 
Net income/(loss) for the year (42,339) 6,352 10,690 (25,297) 292,814 (119,100)60,042 1,553 41,655 276,964 
Accounts receivable 2,070,499 91,233 54,414 - (104,567)2,111,579 
Inventories 7,804 166,229 - 174,033 
Fixed assets, net 7,679,081 1,149,084 69,061 - 8,897,226 
Expenditures for additions to
long lived assets
1,187,907 1,175,691 13,672 - 2,377,270 

 2003 
Fixed telephonyand data transmission Mobile telephony Internet Eliminations Consolidated
Accounts receivable 1,859,325 - 33,023 (32,635) 1,859,713 
Inventories 8,042 - - - 8,042 
Fixed assets, net 8,760,392 280,999 4,564 - 9,045,955 
Expenditures for additions to long lived assets 1,295,915 109,113 1,290 - 1,406,318 

F - 104


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

d. New accounting pronouncements

     In May 2003 FASB Statement 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity, was issued. This Statement establishes standards for the classification and measurement of certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. The Statement also includes required disclosures for financial instruments within its scope. For the Company, the Statement was effective for instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003 and otherwise was effective as of January 1, 2004, except for mandatorily redeemable financial instruments. For certain mandatorily redeemable financial instruments, the Statement willwas be effective for the Company on January 1, 2005. The effective date has been deferred indefinitely for certain types of mandatorily redeemable financial instruments. The Company currently does not have any financial instruments that are within the scope of this Statement.

F - 91


BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

     In December 2003, FASB Statement 132 (revised), Employers’ Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits, was issued. Statement 132 (revised) prescribes employers’ disclosures about pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans; it does not change the measurement or recognition of those plans. The Statement retains and revises the disclosure requirements contained in the original Statement 132. It also requires additional disclosures about the assets, obligations, cash flows, and net periodic benefit cost of defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans. The new annual disclosure requirements became effective for the Company as of the year ended December 31, 2004. Disclosures required by this standard are included in the notes to these consolidated financial statements.

     In December 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation 46 (revised December 2003), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, which addresses how business enterprise should evaluate whether it has a controlling financial interest in an entity through means other than voting rights and accordingly should consolidate this entity. FIN 46R replaces FASB Interpretation 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, which was issued in January 2003. The Company was required to apply FIN 46R to variable interests in VIEs created after December 31, 2003. For variable interests in VIEs created before January 1, 2004, the Interpretation will be applied beginning on January 1, 2005. For any VIEs that must be consolidated under FIN 46R that were created before January 1, 2004, the assets, liabilities and noncontrolling interests of the VIEs initially would be measured at their carrying amounts with any difference between the net amount added to the balance sheet and any previously recognized interest being recognized as the cumulative effect of an accounting change. If determining the carrying amounts is not practicable, fair value at the date FIN 46R first applies may be used to measure assets, liabilities and noncontrolling interests of the VIE. The adoption of FIN 46R did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.

     In December 2004, the FASB issued FASB Statement 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, which addresses the accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services, with a primary focus on transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions. This Statement is a revision to Statement 123 and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and its related implementation guidance. Management, which becomes effective as of January 1, 2006, of the Company does not expect any significant impact on the Company’s financial statements by applying this pronouncement.

F - 105


Table of Contents

BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

     In December 2004, the FASB issued FASB Statement 151, Inventory Costs, which clarifies the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted material (spoilage). Under this Statement, such items will be recognized as current-period charges. In addition, the Statement requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. This Statement will be effective for the Company for inventory costs incurred on or after January 1, 2006. Management of the Company does not expect any significant impact on the Company’s financial statements by applying this pronouncement.

     In December 2004, the FASB issued FASB Statement 153, Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets, which eliminates an exception in APB 29 for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets and replaces it with a general exception for exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial substance. This Statement will be effective for the Company for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring on or after January 1, 2006. Management of the Company does not expect any significant impact on the Company’s financial statements by applying this pronouncement.

F - 92


BRASIL TELECOM S.A.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Brazilian reais)

     In March 2005, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation 47, “Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations”, which clarifies the term conditional asset retirement obligation as used in SFAS 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations”, as a legal obligation to perform an asset retirement activity in which the timing and/or method of settlement are conditional on a future event that may or may not be within the control of the Company. FIN 47 is effective no later than the end of fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005. The Company adopted SFAS 143 effective January 1, 2003, and currently does not expect that the adoption of the Interpretation 47 will have a material impact on the Company’s results of operation or financial position.

     In May 2005, the FASB issued FASB Statement 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections”, which replaces APB Opinion 20, “Accounting Changes”, and FASB Statement 3, “Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements”, and changes the requirements for the accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principle. This Statement shall be effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005.

     In February 2006, the FASB issued FASB Statement 155, “Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments”, which amends FASB Statements 133, “Accounting for Derivativa Instruments and Hedging Activities”, and 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities”. This Statement shall be effective for all financial instruments acquired or issued after the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006. Management of the Company does not expect any significant impact on the Company’s financial statements by applying this pronouncement.

     In March 2006, the FASB issued FASB Statement 156, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections”, which amend FASB Statement 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities”, with respect to the accounting for separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities. This Statement shall be effective as of the beginning of its first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006. Management of the Company does not expect any significant impact on the Company’s financial statements by applying this pronouncement.

F - 93106